HomeMy WebLinkAbout91_013 PC ResolutionRESOLUTION NO. 91-013
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING TRACT MAP NO.
19872-4, MINOR CHANGE NO. 2 TO REVISE THE
ARCHITECTURAL FLOOR PLANS, ELEVATIONS AND
PLOTTING OF HOUSING LOCATED SOUTHERLY OF
PALA ROAD, WESTERLY OF VIA GILBERTO AND KNOWN
AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS. 918-293-007-012; 918-
293-027-030; 918-362-030-048; AND 918-363-001-043.
WHEREAS, Kaufman and Broad filed Tract Map No. 19872-4, Minor
Change No. 2 in accordance with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, 'Planning and
Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference;
WHEREAS, said Tract Map (Minor Change) application was processed in
the time and manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered said Tract Map (Minor
Change) on February 25, 1991, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to
testify either in support or opposition;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, the Commission
approved said Tract Map (Minor Change);
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. F_~. That the Temecula Planning Commission hereby
makes the following findings:
A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly
incorporated city shall adopt a general plan within thirty (30) months
following incorporation. During that 30-month period of time, the city is not
subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or the
requirements of state law that its decisions be consistent with the general
plan, if all of the following requirements are met:
(1) The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the
preparation of the general plan.
(2) The planning agency finds, in approving projects and
taking other actions, including the issuance of building
permits, each of the following:
STAFFRP'~TM19872
(a)
There is a reasonable probability that the land
use or action proposed will be consistent with
the general plan proposal being considered or
studied or which will be studied within a
reasonable time.
(b)
There is little or no probability of substantial
detriment to or interference with the future
adopted general plan if the proposed use or
action is ultimately inconsistent with the plan.
(c)
The proposed use or action complied with all
other applicable requirements of state law and
local ordinances.
B. The Riverside County General Plan, as amended by the
Southwest Area Community Plan, (hereinafter "SWAP") was adopted prior
to the incorporation of Temecula as the General Plan for the southwest
portion of Riverside County, including the area now within the boundaries of
the City. At this time, the City has adopted SWAP as its General Plan
guidelines while the City is proceeding in a timely fashion with the
preparation of its General Plan.
C. The PrOPosed Tract Map (Minor Change) is consistent with
the SWAP and meets the requirements set forth in Section 65360 of the
Government Code, to wit:
(1) The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with a
preparation of the general plan.
(2) The Planning Commission finds, in approving of projects
and taking other actions, including the issuance of building
permits, pursuant to this title, each of the following:
(a)
There is reasonable probability that Tract Map
No. 19872-4, Minor Change No. 2 proposed will
be consistent with the general plan proposal
being considered or studied or which will be
studied within a reasonable time.
(b)
There is little or no probability of substantial
detriment to or interference with the future
adopted general plan if the proposed use or
action is ultimately inconsistent with the plan.
STAFFRP%TM19872
(c)
The proposed use or action complies with ail
other applicable requirements of state law and
local ordinances.
D. (1) Pursuant to Section 7.1 of County Ordinance No. 460,
no subdivision may be approved unless the following findings are made:
a)
That the proposed land division is consistent
with applicable general and specific plans.
b)
That the design or improvement of the proposed
land division is consistent with applicable
general and specific plans.
c)
That the site of the proposed land division is
physically suitable for the type of development.
d)
That the site of the proposed land division is
physically suitable for the proposed density of
the development.
e)
That the design of the proposed land division or
proposed improvements are not likely to cause
substantial environmental damage or
substantially and unavoidably injure fish or
wildlife or their habitat.
f)
That the design of the proposed land division or
the type of improvements are not likely to cause
serious public health problems.
g)
That the design of the proposed land division or
the type of improvements will not conflict with
easements, acquired by the public at large, for
access through, or use of, property within the
proposed land division. A land division may be
approved if it is found that alternate easements
for access or for use will be provided and that
they will be substantially equivalent to ones
previously acquired by the public. This
subsection shall apply only to easements of
record or to easements established by judgment
of a court of competent jurisdiction.
(2) The Planning Commission in approving of the
proposed Tract Map (Minor Change), makes the following findings, to wit:
STAFFRPT~TM 19872
STAFFRPT~TM 19872
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)
g)
The proposed use of action complies with State
Planning and Zoning Laws. Reference Local
Ordinance Nos. 348 and 460; and California
Government Code Sections 65000-66009
(Planning and Zoning Law).
The site is suitable to accommodate the
proposed land use in terms of the architectural
floor plans, elevations and plotting of housing,
due to the fact that the project complies with the
development standards as outlined in
Ordinance No. 348.
The project as designed and conditioned will not
adversely affect the public health or welfare nor
affect the built or natural environment as
determined in the previously adopted Negative
Declaration for this project.
Tract No. 19872-4, Minor Change No. 2, is
compatible with surrounding land uses. The
harmony in scale, bulk, height, density, and
coverage creates a compatible physical
relationship with adjoining properties, due to the
fact that the proposed single-family residences
are consistent with the development of the
subject R-2 zone.
The proposal will not have an adverse effect on
surrounding property, because it does not
represent a significant change to the 3resent or
planned land use of the area.
The design of the subdivision is consistent with
the State Map Act in regard to future passive
energy control opportunities. Units have
significant southern exposure which allows for
passive heating opportunities. Deciduous
landscaping can be utilized to allow solar
penetration in winter and shading in summer.
The design of the subdivision, the type of
improvements and the resulting street layout are
such that they are not in conflict with easements
for access through or use of the property within
the proposed projects.
h)
That said findings are supported by minutes,
maps, exhibits and environmental documents
associated with these applications and herein
incorporated by reference.
E. As conditioned pursuant to SECTION 3, the Tract Map (Minor
Change) is compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community.
SECTION ~ Environmental Compliance.
That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby determines that
the previous environmental determination (Adoption of Negative Declaration for
Environmental Assessment No. 19105) still applies to said Tract Map (Minor Change).
.~ECTION .3. Conditions,
That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby approves Tract
Map No. 19872-4, Minor Change No. 2 for the revision of the architectural floor plans,
elevations and plotting of housing located southerly of Pala Road, westerly of Via Gilberto
and known as Assessor's Parcel Nos. 918-293-007-012; 918-293-027-030; 918-362-030-
048; and 918-363-001-043 subject to the following conditions:
A. Exhibit A, attached hereto.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 25 day of February 1991
~FF
CHAIRMAN
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the
Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the
25 day of February, 1991 by the following vote of the Commission:
AYES: 4 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS Blair, Ford, Hoagland, Chiniaeff
NOES: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS None
ABSENT: 1 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS Fahey
STAFFRPT~TM 19872
~I~.RS~.Dr ¢OIJH'TY ~,OA.R.~ O~
Tr~q~ATZVE TRA~'T NO.
~d~nce 660, Schedule A . ~es8 ~d~f~ed by ~e co~C~ons.
hl~. ~g approved az cond~t~o~ approved tentative Mp v~l. ~re
provided ~ ~dXuence 460.
The £~tl sip o~ll tm prepared t~ · uSXtteud cXvll eusX~ir ~b~ec~
to all ~h ~e~Xrewu~a of ~ St·t· of ~l~fo~/a Su~v~sXon hp ~t
~. uveu~e ~u~7 su~o~ ~d~ce ~60.
~e su~v~er o~ll 8u~t ~ ~y of · ~ls re~ to t~ ~vers~de
If au7 ~4L~ ~ pro~d, ~ ~MSvXde~ ~ll ~t ~ p~t ~f
I~ hht~. b plau s~ll c~l~'~th ~ ~fou Buildins Code,
~ptez 70, , m~ed by ~ce 457 Oe oleos ethan ,tipula~ed by
b ~t7'. ~lb~e hvtl~tnt Steudard,. · . ·
A sred~ns' per~Lt ddll be obtl~ued £rou the Ihpe~tntnt of ~ldLflS and
~ety ~g to m~nt of ~ Sz~l outelde ~ocained
~d fl~t of wy. ~'~ ~ pto~d ~ ol~e8
~ut. ~ ~lar ~ of t~ ~pr~ed ~ad~ns ~hu Jh81l
'hd
by the ~nt~ ~4 ~osioM~. St~t SMa s~ll ~ subject to
apparel of t~ hd Cm~sst~r.
Conditions Of Approval
9. Easements, when required for roadway slopes, drainage facilities, utilities,
etc., shall be shown on the final map if within the land division boundary.
All offers of dedication and conveyances shall be submitted and recorCed
es directed by the Riverside County Surveyor.
10. Water and se~mrage disposal facilities shall be installed in accordance
with the provisions set forth in the Riverside County Health Department's
letter d&ted 1/18/eS end 8/Z0/84, (copies of'which ere eottmched).
11.
12.
13.
14.
The subdivider shill comply with the flood control recoemendetlons outlined
the Riverside County Flood Control District's letter dated 01-03-85,
~copy of which ts ett~ched). %f the lend divtstop lies within an adopted
flood control dratnmge irma pursuant tO Section IO.ZS of Riverside County
Lend Division Ordinance 460, Ipproprtete fees for the construction of area
drainage facilities shill be collected by the Rued Comntsstoner.
The subdivider shell c~ply with the .ftro tmrovem~nt roCOnl~endattons outlined
in the ~ounty Fire Mmrshill's letter dated 1/15/85 (e copy ~f which is Itt&chid).
Iff aCCOrdance with the written request of the lenddtvtdar to the County of
Riverside, e copy of which ts on file, and in furtherance of the agreement
betwen the lenddtvtder end the [lstnoro Unlun High School and TeMcu?a Union
School Districts, no building pimlts shell be issued by the County of River-
side for any pirelli within the SUb3ec~trlctm~p until the landdtvtdlr, or
tho lenddtvtder's successors or Isstgnees, provides evidence of compliance
with the terms of smtd mgroi~nt between the linddtvtder and the school districts
~rtor to the filing of the ftnll ma~, ~ho ep~ltcent_shel? submt~t))en
cleermnces to the Riverside County Roma mhd Survey ueperrJ~ent that all perc~
nent requtrl~nts outlined in the attached approval letters fro~ the following
Igenctes have been ll~.
Fire Depirtl~t Health Oppirtmnt
Flood Control · Planotng Oepirtmont
I~to~ to the recordilGIm of thi.fln~l ~.p, Change of..Z~e. No..42.90 shill be
approved by the Board Of SupervisOrS .ina shall be evrocc~ve: LoC) cT~ated
b~ thts lend division shall be in conrm~aincl with the develotx~t standards
of the z~e ultialtel~, app11ed to the proper~y.
16. Lots created by t. his .Subdtvisto~ shell be in conference with the development
standards of thi.~Z/Itlstrlcted Single-Family zone.
j~17. Constructtun of the developmnt permitted hereby my ~ ~ne p~ssively
phmses, p~vtd~ ed~ue~ ~lcular access ts c~st~ct~ for all ~lltng_
units in flch p~se~d furt~r p~vtd~tMt such deveJo~nt C~TO~ SUO-
s~ntiilly with tM Intent lad purpose of ~ approved Tract ~p No. 19872,
~. 2. S~ld the ~velo~r ch~se to c~st~ct the develowt tn p~ses,
I phistng plan ~st ~ suMlttH for Planning ~pir~t approval.
18, Corner lots shell ~ p~vlded ~th additive1 mroa pursuant ~ ~tton 3~86
of Ordinance 4~,
TENTAT[V£ TRACT NO. 1987~, Amd.
Conditions of Approval
Pege -3-
19.
#he~ lots ere crossed bymjor publlc uttltty easements, eech lot shall have
net usable ires of not less than 3,600 square feet, exclusive of the
ut~ltt~y easement.
20. Concrete stdevalks shell be constructed tn ~hts subdivision tn accordance
wtth the standards of 0rdtnence 461.
21. Well end/or fence locations shell conform to the fencing exhtbtt, on file st
the Plenntng Oepartmentvtth Tentative Tract No. 19872.
22. Landscaping plans shall 'Incorporate the use of sbectmen t~s along streets
tn conjunction vtth strflt tr~e planting.
23. ghere street trees cannot be planted wtthln the right-of-way Of anterior
streets and project parkva.vs, due to Insufficient road rtght-of-w&y, they
shell be planted outstde of the road right-of-ray.
/~4. All extstlng spoctmn trees 'end significant rock outc~opptngs on the subject
property shell he sho~m on road Improvement and gredtng plans and shslT note
those to be remOVld, relocated and/or ~titned.
2S. All Ixtsttng sp~t~n t~ts on the sub~ect p~perty shell ~ p~se~ed
~erever feestble. ~re t~ cannot ~ prese~, the~ s~11 ~ relocated
or ~plicH
mat trees shill ~ nord on ipp~ved landscaping plans.
26. ~ oak t~s
~ ~pliced ~ I ~ (10} ~ ~e (1) ~sts is append by t~ Planning
Oi~tor. ~llcKt ems s~11 be noted ~ ipp~ved landscaping plans.
fl~t, t~ lolling tm p~se~acaon ~ldellnes s~11 ~ tncorporited
Ipp~vH gredtng, ~tldtng ~d landscaping plans Is nKeesir~:
a) £ve~ ell'err she~l be Bade to prevent encroachment of structures,
-gr&dlng or trenchtng ~tthln the d.~tpltne_.or t~lent3~-flve (2S) feet of
the trunk of I~y tree, vhlchever 15 greater.
b) If encroochMnt~tthtn tbe'drtplln4 t$ unavoidable, no Bore than one
third oft he eno tarsi shall be dasturbed, g~ded or covered vith
tmparvtousit~'lala. The root area Is considered to extlfld beyond
the drtpllne a dtstince aqua! to one half the redtus.
c): Building, gredtng or l~pruvenonts shall not occur wlth?n te~ (10) feet
of &~Y tm trunk.
d) Ret&thing valle $hell be constructed vhere necesser}, to preserve
netorel grede to et least one-half the distance between the trunk
end the drlpllne. IMllS sh&11 be destgned w~th i post Or caisson
" footing rather Thin I continuous foottng to mtnimtze root damage.
~nd~ttons of App~ov~l
Page '-4-
e) klteratfon of ri&tufa1 drainage shell be avotded to the greatest extent
possible.
f) Runoff channelled near trees shall not substanttelly change no--,al
sol1 moisture characteristics on a seasonal basts.
g) Runoff shell not be directed towards the'bise of tries so that the
base of the trees rematn tn ~et soil for an extended pertod.. ~nere
nat~ril topography has ~tn ~lt~rid, dri~n~g~ ~ f~m t~nks shall
be prov~ded~rl ~s$1r~to ensure tMt ~r ~tll not $tind it
t~ c~.
h) ~dl~tatlon ~nd siltation In the drainage wa~s ~hall ~ co~t~ll~d
~ere necessar~ to ~votd fllltnQ.a~un~.the ~s~ ~
~) Land uses t~t ~uld c~use ~xcesslve solid cm~ctl~ ~thln the drip-
line of t~es shell ~ avotded. %f t~ ~mt ~ri pllnn~d for ri~ri~t~on,
p~vld~ tritls to ~strl~ c~p~ctton to ~ ~11 ~l. ~lv7 use under
t~l shall ~ ~vold~ unless ~lsu~ to minimize c~Ktlon ~ri
t~n.
3) L~ndscaplng or trrlQatton shill not ~ l~st~11~ ~ln ten (10)
of ~ t~e.
k) Ca~u~ consideration shel~ ~ g~ven ~o ~e p~i~ng of st~c~uris near
~rfls ~ Ivo~d uflflecesse~ or ~cess~ve
28. Grid4flg p~lns shll~ cofl~o~ ~o Board idop~ed H~3s~de hve3o~n~ S~nda~s:
All cu~ ~d/or ~1~ s3opes, o~ ~fld~v~dua3 c~,i~s ~f, ~ch exceed
of a sputa1 ~rrictng (~ch~ng) ~an, ~nc~ise~ SlOpe ratio ~e.g ),
Prlo~ ~ ~e ipp~vll, of gridtng Hmtts. In~l~11 c~eptull ~ridt~g.~lin
s~11 ~ su~tM ~ ~ Pllnnlng Ot~tor TO~ Ipp~vll. ~e pllh sn~l/
M us~ iS I ~ldel~ for subsequent ~1~ gridlflg plifls fop
p~ses of ~vel~t aM Shill tnclu~ ~
I} Techniques vhtch vtll be uttllzid to prevent eroston end sedtmen-
t~tIQ~ during ~nd Ift~r the grading process.
b) ~roxtmtl tile frms for gridtng end IdentSflcitto. n of arias
l~hich lily be g~ided durtng the higher probibtllt,y rilfl months Of
&lnul~ throug~ I#r~.
c) Prellmlnar,j pad ind roadvay elevations.
kll InanuCacturid slopes exceeding ten (10) feet 4n vertical hetght $hell be
co~tour-gridnd Incorporating the following gradtng techniques:
I) The angle of the graded slope shell be gradually adjusted to the
angle of the natural terratn.
T£N~ATIVE TRACT NO. 19872.
Conditions of Approval
Page -$-
31.
b) Angular ¢o~ms shall ~e discouraged. The graded for~ shall reflect
the natural rounded terreJn.
c) The toes end tops of slopes shall be rounded w~th curves with ridl~
designed tn proportion to the total hetght of the slope where
drainage and stability permtt such rounding,
d) ~e~ ~t or f~l slopes exc~d 3~ ~C ~n'~r?zon~l length, the
bo~tzon~l con~urs of the slope s~11 ~ curved In I contlnuous
undull~tng fishJon.
~tural fe~tu~s such es ~ter c~r~s, s~ctmn t~ees end significant rock
outcrops shall ~ pro~c~d tn t~ stttng ~f Individual butldlng ~ds on
~tnll g~dtng plans.
tn eJned tn I ~ted-fr# condition and
32. Graded but undeveloped lind shall be ma t
shall ha itthar planted vtth Interim landscaping or provided vtth other
eroston control mlsures eS approved by the Director of Gulldtflg end safl~Y.
33. Prtor to the tssuince of grldtng penates, the developer shall provtde,evtdiflce
to the Otrwctor of ButldJng Ind Safety thee Ill eddicent off-stto manufactured
slopes hive ~ecorded slope eesemen~s end that sl~p~..m~.~tenln~e._rt.~.~p?stbtltt~e
have been &sstgned is ipproved b~ the OttlCTOr eT uullalng eno ~4TIT.y,
34. An Environmental CO~$trilntl She4~ (ECS) shall be prepered vlth the f~nsl
to delineate Identlfted envtromaln~il con~e~s ind shall he.~.nnane~t~? f~?u.
wtth the offtce of the County Surve~r. Prlor to the recoraeClOn OT cng Tine&
map, m copy of the £CS sh~11 bi trensmtt.to~, to the Ple~n~ng.~pert.M. nt ~o~_
re¥tiw and epprovll. The approved ECS snell he fon~roed ~ltn copies or The ,
recorded final lip to The Pl~nntng Dipe~eent end the Depertaint of 8utld~ng
and Safety.
· C~untv BIoloatcll Report No. g6 lis prepirio
f~& ~t ~ R~ve~JM'C~W Pl~tng
'~ ~mtU I11~flg I~ ~rTace ~lTer~.~'_~_~u...4~ -s dt~Cted
rater · Light and gli~ wy_idversel~
~d shteld~ to p~v~t dtrKt 111~1niT~gn
~sstng though t~ l~tnilre.'
1~NTATIVE TRACT NO. lg872. Am~. !~
ConB'ttions of Approval
Page -6-
38. Street lights shall be provided within the subdivision in accordance with
the standards of Ordinance 461 end the following:
a) Co~currenti¥ with the filing of subdivision improvement plans with the
Road Department, the developer shall secure approval of the P~oposed
street lighting layout free first the appropriate utility purveyor and
then the Road Oeparta~nt's traffic engineer.
b) Follc~ing approval of the street light(ne layout bytho Road OepartMnt's
traffic engineer, the developer sholl also file and application ~th
L~CO for the fomatto~ of I ~t~et )lghting district, or annexation
to in exSsttng 11ght~ng dtstflCt,.~les~ the stte ~s ~thln In extsttng
!tghClng dtStr~Gt.
c) P~tor to ~co~atton of ~e flnll wp, t~ divilope~ shill secure c~dt-
ttOnll Ipprovll of t~ lt~lt 11ghttng IppltciCton f~ ~C0, ~less
t~ St~ Is ~n in extstt~ 11ghttng dtste~ct.
3g. One center Menttftcatlon mo~t sign, tn accordance v~th 0rdlnence 348,
shill be ellowd for the houstng area. Other stgnagn shell be illMd tn
conformance vlth 0rdtnance 348. No billboards shill be ~emttted.
40. Roof-mounted equtpnent shell no~ be pemtttod vtthtn the subdtvtston~ /
41. All butldlng pemlts and/or plans for all ney structures shell Incorporate/
t11e or other ftre eetardant reoftng end stdtflg tutorials, as approved b,v --
the Ceun~ Fire I~arohe11.
4~. Pelor to tM Issuance of butldtug permits for.any phase of developmnt, the
;developer shell submtt final developmnt plane to the Planntng Department
for approval, pursuant to Sactton 7.11g of Ordinance 348.
e.h111 ~ successfully annexed to the Rancho California )tuntcIpal rater DtStrlcT
44. Outldtng separation ~etvfln the nelrest structural portions of dweTltngs
shell be no less thin 10 feet,
o
45. ~ side ~ard ieee vhlch Ms viltM~s, mchen, t. cel.eq~tpne_ nt
~t~ctt~s, ~cept f~ces, 1~i~ ~n T~e Tilt o~ I.s~ae ~ot_~
sM11 ~ ~S~ ~th drllfll~ plHS ~ ae-~tor mr ya~s or Such o~ner
m~ ~ Ipp~v~ ~ tM ~lr~nt of 0ulldt~ and
46. MI drtvevirs shill be concrete ~lved or equtvtle~t is approved by the Planning
Oepart~ent.
.' ~.47. Fenctng shall be provtded throughout the eubdtvlston tn accordance vIth tho *'
· ' &pproved plan of develolxmnt.
Prior to the tssuance of grediug paroles, the applicant sho11 subnSt s fencing
plan for Planntng OepartJaant IpproVIt.
cond~[~ons of Approval
Page -7-
4g.
Prtor to r~c~rdatt&n of any ftnal map, e final plan of devetopment $hall b
sub~ttted for Planntng Department approval, pursuant to Secttofl 7.119 of
Ordinance 348.
The final plan of developMnt shall contain the ¢ollovtflg elements:
e) The stte's ftnel gredtng plan.
·
b) A final site plai shoving the lots, butldtng footprfnts, a11'
setiMcks, yard spaces and floor plan and elevation assignments
to Individual lots.
c) Worktng drawings of the floor plans and elevations for the
dwlllngs to be constructed tn the sulxItvlslon. Elevations
$1ull be provtdld for all $tdos of all buildings.
d) AtYPtcal mechanical plan shovtng the locatlon and plat·mast
of Beth·ileal equtpmnt for Individual (Millage.
The required ftnal plai of developmnt shall.ha tn substantial conformance
vtth the project's approved gradtng plan, stte plai, floor plais and el·va- -
Stone e~capt as provtdad for.tn Sectton 7.11gC2).
· .. SO, P~tor to tho Issuaice of Imtldtng Immfts final clear·ice aha11 be obtafned
the Planntng Departmnt stipulating that tho sul~ttl:id butldtng plais confom
to the approved plan of dovoiopmnt for the property.
//~/S1~ P~or to the tssuance of occupaicy'perBtt$~ · decorative block ~11 or comb,n-
ation landscaped sa~thai bernaid decorative block~11 sM11 be constructed
along Pal· Road aid ¥1a Gtlberto. All lot$ shall be provided vtth
and rear yard fencing, aid said fencing aha11 be shorn off the fencing plan.
All block ualls or cmubtnattofl earthen bom/decorative block walTslhaTI also
be ahovA ai the fencing plan, A11 fences shell be constructed prior to the
tssuance of occopaicy ~rmlts.
S2. Thts aubdlvt~'ton ~y be recorded tn phlses suSPect to the fo11wfng: ~/
1) Proposed phasing, tncledtflg phase boundaries, sequencing aid floor
plan sel~ctton~ aha11 be lubJ!ct to Plaontng Otrector'a approval o
S)QfEaChOrdlnincePr°P°sedMe,phase sba11 .c°Bplx with the Pr°vlstons.of. Section 7.11
3~ ~f any phase of the subdivision wtll be developed vIth fever thin the
· pproved hued)er Of floor plans, the c~mlattve mtx of ¢1oor plans
resulting from the sequential recordation of phases shall comply utah
the provisions ot' Secttofl 7.Tlr(3) of Ordtflaico 348.
TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 19872, kno. #2
Condt:4on$ of Approval
Page -8-
f4~tT~the~4s~w~1f~g~aves~te~ha~be~re1~e~ted~a~d~e¢ted~b7~the~f~n~g.~
64feeteet*-A~-exhumat4oel-eeteeat4on-and-ereMeo~og4eo~-expeMes-$hat~-be-t~e--
relpoM4b4~4ty-of-tM-deve~aperv--The-ee~eeat4oa-sha~-fo~ew-tM-fo~ew~g-.
peeeeed4alsT-ee-etke~-aeeeeed~Ms-a~-appreved-b~-the-P~aen4~g-B~re~tee~
e~--~ke-devele~ew-ska1%-ebLa4e-a-eeeM-eedef~-aetker4~ed-~-a-membee-ef-the-
Wa~f-flm4&y-o~-anT-etkeP-ees~n$4~e-pewt~v-~o-~e~ove-aM-re~oeate-ae~-re~a~M
aml-t#e-UmbsUM-lo*i-s4te-dea4g~ted-b~-tAe*P~ann4nl-Bepa~eflt.
~--A-qu&J4f4ed-apthlealogJst-sM~-be-ee-144~*duP4M*e~y-aM-a~1-exeevat4oR*
c~..The-p~epaw-ee~4j4euo-op-othep-ee~toe4etv-aj-d4weeted-b~-fem4~7*~esbe~s-oe
e~..aw~o~-te-u~t~n4ad-pe~it~,-the~eve~pe~-o~-e~te~-4nto-!~'eg~eee~
sl~-b..t~ve Tract ~. 1M72,~. ~. Z. T~ le~uage off the plaque
*blared R Plinths Cmtls~on 2-2~8S.
UL~:Jle ;gn;&.o