HomeMy WebLinkAbout061494 CC AgendaAGENDA
TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
A REGULAR MEETING
COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER - 30875 RANCHO VISTA ROAD
JUNE 14, 1994- 7:00 PM
,. EXECUTIVE' SESSION:':S:30:PM; :.~0Sed:. i.s~iiO,=' ~:the=~t~:. C0.n~il';.pursUant to'
· Government coljb §54957:6~'CONFERENCE;:WlTH:i;jABOR= NEGOTIATOR :,E Agency'
.negotiators,'" :.HarwOod EdvalSon and Grant..Yates - Employee organization: Teamsters
· Local 9 i 1, repres~ntlng ·General· and .'rmfessi0na!~con~der!al:':e!i~yae; groups~ ...: ..
Government Cbde §54959;9 (b): regarding potential litigation; ar~!':'i54956.9Tort ....
At approximately 9:45 PM, the City Council will determine which of the remaining
agenda items can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00 PM and may
continue all other items on which additional time is required until a future meeting.
All meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 PM.
CALL TO ORDER:
Invocation:
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. 94-16
Resolution: No. 94-58
Mayor Ron Roberrs presiding
Pastor Gary Nelson, Calvary Chapel of Temecula
Flag Salute:
Councilmember Birdsaft
ROLL CALL:
Birdsall, Mur~oz, Parks, Stone, Roberts
PRESENTATIONS/
PROCLAMATIONS
Proclamation - CRC Day
6th and 7th Grade Bicycle Safety Essay Contest Awards
Special Recognition, Mark Katan, Target Stores
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Council on
items that are not listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited
to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council on an item not listed on the
Agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out
and filed with the City Clerk.
R:V~gende~81494 I
When you ere called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk
before the Council gets to that item. There is · five (5) minute time limit for individual
speakers.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made at
this time. A total, not to exceed, ten (.10) minutes will be devoted to these reports.
CONSENT CALENDAR
NOTICE TO 'THE PUBLIC
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be
enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless members
of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for
separate action.
Standard Ordinance Adoption Procedure
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1
Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in
the agenda.
Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve the minutes of May 10, 1994;
2.2 Approve the minutes of May 23, 1994;
2.3 Approve the minutes of May 24, 1994.
3
R:~4enda%O81484
Resolution ADOrOvinQ List of Demands
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1
Adopt a resolution entitled: ..
RESOLUTION NO. 94-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING
CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
2
4
City Treasurer's Reoort
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Receive end file the City Treasurer's report as of April 30, 1994.
6
Records Destruction Reouest
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1
Approve scheduled destruction of certain records as provided under the City of
Temecula approved Records Retention Policy.
;
Caoital Imorovement Proiect - Rancho California Soorts Park Desiltation Lake Imorovement
Proiect
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1
Approve Amendment No. I for 912,000 to the design contract with J.F. Davidson
Associates, Inc. for preparation of a biological study and analysis.
6.2
Appropriate $12,000 to Capital Projects Account No. 210-190-138-5802and
approve an operating transfer from Development Impact Fund of 912,000,
establishing the Rancho California Desiltation Lake Improvement Project.
7
Aoorooriation of Funds Within the Insurance Internal Service Fund
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1 Approve appropriation of funds as follows:
Property Insurance $ 5,000
Claims Examiner $ 6,500
Claims $ 69,000
Other Outside Services $ 2,300
Contract Change Order Nos. 12 throuQh 14 for the Liefer Road Bridge and Street
Imorovements. Project No. PW93-02
RECOMMENDATION:
8.1
Approve the final Contract Change Orders Nos. 12 through No. 14 for Liefar Road
Bridge and Street Improvements Project, PW93-02, pertaining to labor and
equipment for various items of work, in the amount of 916,655.40.
R:%Agenda%061494 3
8.2
Approve an advance from the Development Impact Fund of ~2,450.96 to the
Capital Projects Fund.
9
10
Substitute Subdivision Improvement Aareement and Public Imorovement Bond Riders in
Tract No. 22916-F
RECOMMENDATION:
9.1
Accept the Substitute SubdivisiOn Improvement Agreement and riders for Faithful
Performance and Labor and Material' Bonds for Street, Water, and Sewer
Improvements, and Subdivision Monumentation Bond Rider in Tract No. 22916-F,
and Direct the City Clerk to so adv!se the Developer and Surety.
Final Parcel Mao No. 25538 - Southeastern Terminus of Estero Street
RECOMMENDATION:
10. 1 Approve Final Parcel Map No. 25538, subject to the Conditions of Approval.
11
Final Parcel MaD NO. 24633 - Northeast Corner of Estero Street and Ormsbv Road
RECOMMENDATION:
11.1 Approve Final Parcel Map No. 24633, subject to the Conditions of Approval.
12
Bond Reduction and Substitute Subdivision Improvement AQreement and New Public
Improvement Bonds in Tract No. 22915-2
RECOMMENDATION:
12.1
Authorize a' sixty-five (65) percent reduction in Faithful Performance, Street, Water
and Sewer improvement bond amounts, accept the substitute Subdivision
Improvement Agreement and new Public Improvement Bonds in Tract No. 22915-2
and Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Surety.
13
Substitute Subdivision Improvement AQreement and Public Improvement Bond Riders in
Tract No. 22916-2
RECOMMENDATION:
13.1
Accept Substitute Subdivision Improvement Agreement and Riders to Faithful
Performance and Labor and Material Bonds for Street, Water and Sewer
Improvements, and Subdivision Monumentation Bond Rider in Tract No. 22916-2,
and Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Surety.
R:~a~ende'%081484 4
14
Bond Reduction and Substitute Subdivison Imorovement Agreement and New Public
Imorovement Bonds in Tract No. 22915-3
RECOMMENDATION:
14.1
Authorize a fifth-three (53) percent reduction in Faithful Performance Street, Water
and Sewer Improvement Bond Amounts, accept the Substitute Subdivision
Improvement Agreement and Public Improvement Bonds in Tract No. 22915-3 and
Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Surety.
15
Substitute Subdivision Improvement AGreement and RePlacement Public Improvement
Bonds in Tract No. 22916-3
RECOMMENDATION:
15.1
Accept Substitute Subdivision Improvement Agreement and Replacement of Faithful
Performance and Labor and Material Bonds for Street and Water and Sewer
Improvements, and Subdivision Monumentation Bond in Tract No. 22916-3 and
Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Surety.
16
Award Bid to Remove Three Desilting Ponds Along with Debris and Sediment in the
SantiaGo Channel from Vallejo Avenue to John Warner Road
RECOMMENDATION:
16.1
Award a bid for removal of sediment of three (3) desilting ponds in Santiago
Channel to Moody Excavating, the lowest responsible bidder, for the sum of
$18,534.34.
17
Completion and Acceptance of the Puiol Street and First Street .Widening, Project No.
PW92-09
RECOMMENDATION:
17.1 Accept the Pujol St. and First St. Widening Project No. PW92-09, as complete and
direct the City Clerk to:
File the Notice of Completior~, release the Performance Bond, and accept a
one (1) year Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract;
Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after the filing of the
Notice of Completion if no liens have been filed.
R:%'s'iende%061494 6
18
19
Solicitation of Construction Bids for the Installation of Traffic Sianal and Vehicle Pre-
emotion Eauioment, Project No. PW 94-05
RECOMMENDATION:
18.1
Approve the construction plans and specifications and authorize the Public Works
Department to solicit public construction bids for providing and installing Traffic
Signal Pre-emption equipment at the intersections of Rancho California Road and
Front Street, Rancho California Road and. Diaz Road, Margarita Road and Rancho
Vista Road, Margadta Road and Moraga Road, and the providing and installing of
Vehicle Pre-Emption equipment on nine (9) Fire Department vehicles. Project No.
PW94-05.
Contract for Professional Services with C.M. "Max" Gilliss
RECOMMENDATION:
19.1
Approve and authorize the Mayor to execute Professional Services Agreement with
C.M. "Max" Gilliss to act as a liaison between the City and Government Agencies
and special interest groups for an amount not to exceed $8,400.
20
Solicitation of Construction Bids for the Construction of a Temporary Traffic Signal at
Winchester and Nicolas Roads, Project No. PW93-11
RECOMMENDATION:
20.1
Approve the Construction Plans and Specifications and authorize the Public Works
Department to solicit public construction bids for the construction of a temporary
traffic signal on Winchester and Nicolas Roads, Project No. PW93-11.
"PUBLIC HEARINGS
Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before a public
hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of
the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court,
you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the
public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior
to, the public hearing.
R:~gencle~Oe14N,
21
22
Chanae of Zone No. 5570 - Johnson + Johnson - a reauest for the Redesionation of Three
Parcels from R-A-5 (Residential Agricultural, 5 acre minimum parcel size) to R-3 (General
Residential) and C-O (Commercial office) located at the northeast corner of Ynez and
Rancho Vista Roads
RECOMMENDATION:
21.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 94-'
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DENYING
WITHOUT PREJUDICE CHANGE OF ZONE NO. 5570 - A REQUEST TO CHANGE
THE ZONE ON THREE PARCELS FROM R-A-5 (RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL 5
ACRE MINIMUM PARCEL SIZE) TO C-0 (COMMERCIAL OFFICE) ON PARCELS NO.
I AND 3 AND FROM R-A-5 TO R-3 (GENERAL RESIDENTIAL) ON PARCEL NO. 2
ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE NORTHEASTERN CORNER OF RANCHO VISTA
AND YNEZ ROADS AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 9a.a.-290-
015, 944-290-016, AND 944-290-017
AoDeal of Plannincj ADDliCatiOn NOS. 93-0157 and 94-0002 (Temecula Valley Unified
School District Maintenance. Operation and TransPortation Facility and Associated
Environmental Impact RePOrt
An appeal, filed by Councilmember Mu~oz, of the decision of the Temecula Planning
Commission to approve a Conditional Use Permit for property located North of Winchester
Road and west of the extension of Roripaugh Road.
RECOMMENDATION:
22.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 94-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA UPHOLDING
THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION TO APPROVE PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. 93-01576, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION
AND OPERATION OF A TRANSPORTATION, ADMINISTRATION AND
MAINTENANCE FACILITY FOR THE TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL
DISTRICT
R:~4~e~de%061494 7
23
23.2. Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 94-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA CERTIFYING
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 94-0002),
ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENTS OF OVERRIDING
CONSIDERATION AND APPROVING THE MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM ON
PROPERTY LOCATED NORTH OF WINCHESTER ROAD AND WEST OF THE
EXTENSION OF RORIPAUGH ROAD, KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 911 o
180 -024
Lease Aqreement with the Temecula Valley Historical Museum Foundation
RECOMMENDATION:
23.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 94-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING
THE LEASE OF PROPERTY WITHIN SAM HICKS MONUMENT PARK FOR THE
TEMECULA MUSEUM
23.2
23.3
23.4
Accept the Summary Report Pursuant to Section 33433 of the California
Community Redevelopment Law on an amended and restated Lease by and between
the City of Temecula and the Old Town Temecula Historical Museum Foundation.
Approve the amended and restated Museum Lease Agreement by and between the
City of Temecula and the Old Town Temecula Historical Museum Foundation.
Appropriate $500,000to Capital Projects Account No. 210-190-808.-5804and
approve an operating transfer from Development Impact Fund of $500,000 to fund
the renovation of St. Catherine's Church and the construction of the Temecula
Valley Historical Museum at Sam Hicks Monument Park.
R:que~enda~061494 8
COUNCIL BUSINESS
24
Entertainment Licensing Ordinance
RECOMMENDATION:
24.1 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 94-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADDING
CHAPTER 9.10 'SPECIAL LICENSES-BARS, NIGHT CLUBS, DANCE HALLS,
POOLROOMS, ETC.,' TO THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE
25
Extension of Time for Variance No. 10 - a Fifty-Five (55) Foot Hiqh Freeway Oriented Siqn
for Creekside Texaco
RECOMMENDATION:
25.1 Provide direction to Staff regarding Variance No. 10.
26
International Rectifier Owner Particioation AQreement
RECOMMENDATION:
26.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 94-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING
AN OWNER. PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AND INTERNATIONAL RECTIFIER, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION
27
Financinc~ and Construction AQreement ReQardinq the Wideninq of Marqarita Road Between
Rancho California Road and La Serena Way
RECOMMENDATION:
27.1
Approve the agreement with MargaFjta Village Retirement Community, Inc.
providing for the financing and construction of the East side of Margarita between
Rancho California Road and La Serena Way to ultimate width, and authorize the
Mayor to execute the agreement;
R:%~q)e~ia%O61484 9
28
27.2 Appropriate $168,517 in the Margarita Road Reimbursement District Fund Account
No. 220-165-610-5804;
27.3 Approve a $168,517 advance from the Development Impact Fund to the Margarita
Road Reimbursement District Fund.
City ManaQer's Contract
RECOMMENDATION:
28.1 Approve the City Manager's employment contract and'authorize the Mayor and City
Clerk to execute the agreement.
29
Ordinance Restrictina Trucks Over Six Thousand (6.000) Pounds on Rainbow Canyon Road
from Pala Road to the Southern City Limit
RECOMMENDATION:
29.1 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 94-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, AMENDING
CHAPTER 10.20 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADD WEIGHT LIMITS
ON DESIGNATED STREETS
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT
ADJOURNMENT
Next meeting: June 28, 1994, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista
Road, Temecula, California.
R:%A~enda%061494
10
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING - (To be held at 8:00)
CALL TO ORDER: President Jeffrey E. Stone
ROLL CALL: DIRECTORS: Birdsall, Mu~oz, Parks, Roberrs, Stone
PUBLIC COMMENT: Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors, should present a
completed pink "Request to Speak' to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come
forward and state your name and address for the record.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of May 10, 1994;
1.2 Approve the minutes of May 24, 1994.
Contract ChanQe Order No. 14- Community Recreation Center. Phase II, Project No.
PW92-29B
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve Contract Change Order No. 14 for the Community Recreation Center -
Phase II, Project No. PW92-29B, for labor, material, and equipment in the amount of
$48,862.
2.2 Transfer $48,862 from Development Impact Fees to the Capital Projects Fund and
appropriate $48,862 to Account No. 250-190-129-5804.
Award of Construction Contract for Loma Linda Park - Phase II, Project No. PW94-02CSD
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Award a contract for Loma Linda Park, Phase II, Project PW94-02CSD, to Marina
Contractors, Inc. for $104, 104.00 and authorize the President to execute the
contract;
3.2 Authorize the General Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the
contingency amount of $10,410.40, which is equal to 10% of the contract amount.
2
R:~/~erda~O81484
3
4 Reolacement of Landscape Bonds for SlOpe Imorovements - Cosrain Homes/VintaQe Hills
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1
Authorize-the replacement of landscape bonds for slope improvements to Tract No.
22915-02, Tract No. 22915-3, and Tract No. 22916-3 - Cosrain Homes/Vintage
Hills.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Any person may submit written comments to the 'Board of Directors before a public hearing or
may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the
time of hearing; If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be limited to raising only
those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondences
delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing.
5 TCSD Proposed Rates arid CharQes for Fiscal Year 1994-1995
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 94-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY
SERVICES DISTRICT ADOPTING RATES AND CHARGES FOR COMMUNITY
SERVICES, PARKS AND RECREATION, STREET LIGHTING, SLOPE MAINTENANCE,
RECYCLING AND REFUSE COLLECTION SERVICES, AND STREET AND ROAD
IMPROVEMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1994-1995
· GENERAL MANAGERS REPORT- Bradley
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT - Nelson
BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT: Next meeting June 28, 1994, 8:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875
Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California.
R:~enda%0814 g4 12
TEMECULA R'EDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING
CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Ronald J. Parks presiding
ROLL CALL:
AGENCY MEMBERS: Birdsall, Mufioz,. Roberrs, Stone, Parks
PUBLIC COMMENT: Anyone wishing to address the Agency, should present a completed pink
"Request to Speak' to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please
come forward and state your name and address for the record.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of May 10, 1994;
1.2 Approve the minutes of May 24, 1994.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Any person may submit written comments to the Redevelopment Agency before a public hearing
or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the
time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may 'be limited to raising only
those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondences
delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing.
2
R:'~a~Oerda%Oe1494
International Rectifier Owner Participation Aareement
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Conduct a public hearing and,
2.2 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION N0. RDA 94-
A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVING AN OWNER PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND INTERNATIONAL
RECTIFIER, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION
13
AGENCY BUSINESS
3. Authorize Consultino Contracts with Wimberlee, Allison, Tong & Goo and Barton Aschman
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1
Authorize the Chairperson to execute an agreement with Wimberly Allison Tong &
Goo for architectural and planning services not to exceed $54,620 and with Barton-
Aschman for traffic impact analysis not to exceed $34,000. Agreements will be
subject to approval of the Executive Director and General Counsel as to final form.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
AGENCY MEMBER'S REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT: Next Meeting: June 28, 1994, 8:00 PM, Community Recreation Center,
30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California.
R:~Agenda~O61494
14
PROCLAMATIONS/
PRESENTATIONS
The City of Temecula
PROCLAMATION
WHEREAS, the Temecula Community Recreation Center began as the dream of the ·
CRC Foundation in 1989; and
WHEREAS, the Foundation established a three-year goal of raising $300,000 to go
toward a Recreation Center for the community;. and
WHEREAS, this goal was to raise these funds through community sponsorships,
donations and fund raising activities; and
WHEREAS, the Foundation reached their goal'on December 9, 1993, and did in fact
exceed the goal of raising $300,000; and
WFIEREAS, individuals who "Bought a Square Foot" of the facility raised over $30,000
and local corporations made substantial donations,
NOW, T]:FEREFORE, I, Ron Roberts, on behalf of the City Council of the City of
Temecula, hereby proclaim June 10, 1994 to be
"CRC Foundation Day"
IN W$S WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City
of Temecula to be affixed this 10th day of June, 1994.
Ron Roberrs, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
ITEM 1
ITEM NO. 2
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
HELD MAY 1 O, 1994
A regular meeting of the Temecula City Council was called to order at 5:35 PM at the
Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Street, Temecula, California. Mayor Ron
Roberrs presiding.
PRESENT 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Mu~oz, Parks,
Roberts
ABSENT: I
COUNCILMEMBERS: Stone
Also present were City Manager Ronald Bradley, City Attorney Peter M. Thorson, and City
Clerk June S. Greek.
EXECUTIVE SESSION
A meeting of the City of Temecula City Council was called to order at 5:38 PM. It was moved
by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Birdsall to adjourn to Executive Session
pursuant to Government Code §54957.6, Conference with Labor Negotiator, Agency
Negotiator: Harwood Edvalson and Grant Yates. Employee organization: Teamsters Local
911, representing General and Professional/Confidential employee groups; and Government
Code §54956.9(a) Mutziger v. Bedford Properties; Bedford Properties v. city of Temecula.
The motion was unanimously carried with Mayor Pro Tem Stone absent.
INVOCATION
The invocation was given by Pastor W. M. Rench.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The audience was led in the flag salute. by Councilmember Parks.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Michelle Bedard, 39857 Knollridge Drive, requested the City Council appeal the decision of the
Planning Commission to approve the Temecula Valley Bus Barn Project. She presented two
letters to the City Clerk in opposition to the project.
Councilmember Mu~oz stated he is willing to appeal the decision so that residents will have
the opportunity to voice their opposition, howev, er he asked that there be support from the
community present.
Councilmember Parks stated he received a call regarding this project but will not be able to
participate in these proceedings since his firm is doing work for the school district.
Councilmember Mu~oz formally appealed the project.
Minutes~5~l 0\94 -1 - O513 1/94
CiW Council Minutes May 10, 1994
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Councilmember Parks stated he at-tended a SCAG meeting last Thursday, and the Regional
Comprehensive Plan was discussed. He also announced that the California Gnatcatcher is no
longer listed as "threatened species."
Councilmember Mu~oz announced that May 18, 1994 is "Transit Appreciation Day," and all
fixed routes will be available to riders at no charge.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Councilmember Birdsall questioned Item No. 8 if the median is going to be primarily
landscaped with roses. Director of Public Works Tim Serlet stated it will have roses but will
be a more elaborate design than those on Rancho California Road.
Councilmember Parks requested the removal of Consent Calendar Item No. 6. He also stated
that regarding Item No. 8, he would like to be kept informed earlier in the process for projects
such as this, so that Council input can be given. He stated he did have the opportunity to
discuss Item No. 5 with staff and approximately $30,000 of the change orders can be
attributed to Rancho California and Winchester Roads. He recommended approval of this item.
It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Mu~oz to approve
Consent Calendar Items 1-5 and 7-19.
The motion was carried as follows:
AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Mu~oz, Parks, Roberrs
NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Stone
1. Standard Ordinance Adoption Procedure
1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions
included in he agenda.
Minutes
2.1 Approve the minutes of April 5, 1994. .,
Resolution Aoorovina List of Demands
3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 9441
Minutes~5~l 0\94
-2-
05~1~4
CiW Council Minutes MaY 10, 1994
e
e
7~
e
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
City Treasurer's Report as of March 31.1994
4.1 ' Receive and file the City Treasurer's report as of March 31, 1994.
Contract Amendment No. 7 to Community Facilities District 88-12 EnQineerinQ Services
Contract with J.F. Davidson Associates. Inc. for the Overland Drive OvercrossinQ
Imorovement Proiect
5.1
Approve Contract Amendment No. 7 to provide additional engineering services
for CFD 88-12 by J.F. Davidson Associates, Inc. (JFD) for the Overland Drive
Overcrossing Improvement Project in the amount of $106,888.
Combininq Balance Sheets as of March 31. 1994 and the Statement of Revenues,
Exoenditures and Chanaes in Fund Balance and the Statement of Revenues, Exoenses
and Chanqes in Retained Earnines for the Nine Months Ended March 31.1994
7.1
Receive and file the Combining Balance Sheets as of March 31, 1994 and the
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances and the
Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Retained Earnings for the
nine months ended March 31, 1994.
Award Contract for Ynez Road Landscaoe Improvements Project No. PW 94-04
8.1
Award a contract for the Ynez Road Landscape Improvements, PW94-04, to
Emerald Landscape Services for $188,962and authorize the Mayor to execute
the contract;
8.2
Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the
contingency amount of $18,896 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount.
COmPletion and Acceptance of the Marearita Road Sidewalk Improvements, Project No.
PW93-08
9.1
Accept the Margarita Road Sidewalk Improvements, Project No. PW93-08, as
complete and direct the City Clerk to:
File the Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept
a one (1) year Maintenanc~ Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract;
Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after the filing
of the Notice of Completion if no liens have been filed.
Minutes\5\ 10\94 -3- 05/31/94
City Council Minutes May 10. 1994
10.
11.
12.
13.
Contract Change Orders Nos. 05 throuQh No. 11 for Liefer Road Bridge and Street
Imorovements Project, PW93-02
10.1
Approve the final Contract Change Orders Nos. 05 through No. 11 for Liefer
Road Bridge and Street Improvements Project, PW93-02 pertaining to labor and
equipment for various items of work, in the amount of $15,420.60.
10.2 Approve an advance from the DeVelopment Impact Fund of $13,383.35to the
Capital Projects Fund.
Summary Vacation of Portions of Banana Street. Hamilton Avenue. Aoricot Street and
John Jay Avenue
11.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 9443
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA,
CALIFORNIA, TO SUMMARILY VACATE PORTIONS OF BANANA STREET,
HAMILTON AVENUE, APRICOT STREET AND JOHN JAY AVENUE PURSUANT
TO THE AUTHORITY PROVIDED BY CHAPTER 3, PART 3, DIVISION 9 OF THE ·
STREETS AND HIGHWAY CODE
Acceptance of an Offer of Dedication - Storm DrainaQe Easement Over a Portion of Lot
273 of Tract MaD 3883 (APN 919-208-010) Abuttinc~ Calle Fiesta
12.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 94-44
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY .COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA,
CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE OFFER OF DEDICATION OF A STORM
DRAINAGE EASEMENT OVER A PORTION OF LOT 273, TRACT MAP 3883
(APN 919-200-010)ABUTTING CALLE FIESTA
Resolution in SUDDOrt Of Zero-Emission Vehicle Program
13.1 Adopt ~ resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 9445
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
SUPPORTING THE CONTINUATION OF THE LOW EMISSIONS VEHICLE AND
CLEAN FUELS REGULATION, PARTICULARLY THE ZERO EMISSION VEHICLE
MANDATE
Mi nutes\5~ 10\94 -4- 05/31/94
CiW Council Minutes May 10, 1994
14.
15,
16.
17.
Settino the Date, Time and Location of PlanninQ Commission Meetinas
14.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO, 94-46
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA SETTING ·
THE DATE, TIME AND LOCATION OF PLANNING COMMISSION MEETINGS
Comoletion and Acceptance of Ynez Road Widenino Project. project No. PW92-05,
CFD 88-12
15.1 File the Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a one
(1) year Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract;
15.2 Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after the filing of the
Notice of Completion if no liens have been filed.
Amendment of 20th Year Community Development Block Grant APpliCatiOn
16.1 Delete the request for Community Development Block Grant {CDBG) funding for
the Rancho California Sports Park Desiltation Project and add Sam Hicks
Monument Park Improvements to the 20th Year Community Development Block
Grant (CDBG) application.
Resolution AOOrovinq City Attorney and Assistant City Attorneys
17.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 9447
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
APPOINTING THE CITY ATTORNEY AND ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEYS
SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES
18. Ordinance No. 94-12
18.1
Adopt an' ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 94-12
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
REPEALING PORTIONS OF ORDINANCE NO. 90-04 PERTAINING TO
COMMERCIAL AND CHARITABLE SOLICITATIONS AND ADDING CHAPTER
Mi nutes\5\ 10\94 -5- 05/31/94
CiW Counoil Minutee May 10. 1994
19.
5.16 TO THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS
FOR CHARITABLE, RELIGIOUS AND COMMERCIAL SOLICITATIONS
Ordinance No. 94-13
19.1 ' Adopt an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 94-13
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ESTABLISHING STANDARDS FOR WATER EFFICIENT LANDSCAPE DESIGN
"No Parkina" Zone on the North Side of Rancho Vista Road from 290 Feet West of
Arao Court to 480 Feet East of Southern Cross Road
Councilmember Parks expressed concern over restricting parking in an area that has
been used for Sports Park overflow parking.
Director of Public Works Tim Serlet reported this request was initiated by the
Public/Traffic Safety Commission, due to the need for a left turn pocket into the CRC.
Councilmember Birdsall said she is concerned witheliminating parking until the Sports
Park parking lot construction is completed in the Spring.
Director of Community Services Shawn Nelson reported that parking at the CRC has
worked well for overflow purposes.
Mayor Roberrs expressed concern that no cross walk exists in this area.
Councilmember Parks stated he also feels there is a need for a crossing at the CRC and
suggested referring this issue back to the Traffic Commission to consider these
options.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Mu~oz to
approve staff recommendation with instruction to staff that the Council's comments
be returned to the Public Traffic Safety Commission for further review.
6.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 9442
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ESTABLISHING A "NO PARKING" ZONE ON THE NORTH SIDE OF RANCHO
VISTA ROAD FROM 290 FEET WEST OF ARGO COURT TO 480 FEET EAST OF
SOUTHERN CROSS ROAD
Minutes\5~l 0~94 -6- 05/31/94
City Council Minute May 10, 1994
The motion was unanimously carried, with Mayor Pro Tem Stone absent.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
20.
21.
Ordinance Amendina Land Use Code Reaardino Plot Plans. Conditional Use Permits and
Public Use Permits
Director of Planning Gary Thornhill presented the staff report, and recommended that
Section 4 of the ordinance be removed.
Mayor Roberts opened the public hearing at 7:52 PM. Hearing no requests to speak,
Mayor Roberts closed the public hearing at 7:52 PM.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Mu~oz to
approve staff recommendation 20.1, with the removal of Section 4 as follows:
20.1 Read by title only and introduce an Ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 94-14
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
AMENDING THE LAND USE CODE REGARDING THE TERM OF PLOT PLANS,
CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS, AND PUBLIC USE PERMITS
The motion was unanimously carried with Mayor Pro Tern Stone absent.
It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Parks to
approve staff recommendation as follows:
20.2 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 9448
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE LAND USE
CODE REGARDING THE TERM OF PLOT PLANS, CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS,
AND PUBLIC USE PERMITS
The motion was unanimously carried with Mayor Pro Tem Stone absent.
Minor Chanc;e to Tentative Parcel Mac Nd, 26232 Revised No. I (PA94-0033), DMWR,
LTD
Director of Planning Gary Thornhill presented the staff report and advised that the
Conditions of Approval should include Number 60 and 61 in the "prior to issuance of
Minutes\5\ 10\94 -7- 05~31/94
CiW Council Minutes May 10. 1994
grading permitS" section and Condition No. 20 in the "prior to recordation of final map"
section,
Councilmember Mufioz suggested placing consideration of widening of Winchester
Road on a future agenda.
Mayor Roberts opened the public hearing at 8:00 PM.
Michael Perry, representing the applicant, spoke in favor of being allowed to complete
the improvements. However, he objected to being required to double the bond amount
and advised that currently he is required to carry 8% of the cost of the entire
assessment district.
Dennis Chiniaeff, representing Kemper Development, recommended that a list of
locations be maintained. He stated it is his understanding that Series C bonds would
only be an $8,000,000 issue and would not include all of Winchester Road.
Mayor Roberts closed the public hearing at 8:07 PM.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Mu~oz to
approve staff recommendations as follows:
21.1 Reaffirm the Negative Declaration for Tentative Parcel Map No. 26232, Revised
No. I (PA93-0141);
21.2 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 9449
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVING MINOR CHANGE TO TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 26232,
REVISED NO. I (PA 94-0033)TO DELETE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL NO. 25
AND 60 AND TO ADD THREE {3) NEW CONDITIONS TO THE CONDITIONS OF
APPROVAL FOR PA 93-0141 TO ALLOW DEFERRING THE BONDING
REQUIREMENT FOR WINCHESTER ROAD, NOT INCLUDING THE PARKWAY
IMPROVEMENTS, FROM PRIOR TO RECORDATION OF THE FINAL MAP TO
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS FOR THE PROJECT LOCATED ON
THE SOUTH EAST CORNER OF NICOLAS ROAD AND WINCHESTER ROAD
The motion was unanimously carried with Mayor Pro Tem absent.
RECESS
Mayor Roberts called a recess at 8:08 PM. The meeting was reconvened at 9:08 PM
following the previously scheduled CSD and RDA Meeting.
Minutes%5% 10%94 -8- 05/31/94
City Council Minutes
May 10. 1994
22. Procedures and Recommendations for Notice of Public Hearings
Director of Planning Gary Thornhill presented the staff report.
RECESS
Mayor Roberrs called a brief recess at 9:20 PM to change the tape. The meeting was
reconvened at 9:21 PM.
Councilmember Birdsall expressed concern that changes made would become
permanent and provide no method to return to legal requirements in the future.
City Attorney Thorson reported that changes made would be binding, however the
Council would have the future ability to change the procedure.
Councilmember Mu~oz stated he favored the sign showing both the proposed action
and date of the hearing. He supported noticing 1,000 feet when there are residential
properties immediately adjacent, and requested the sign be posted for 30 days before
the hearing.
Director of Planning Thornhill requested that the length of time the noticing be posted
be in accordance with that prescribed by law, stating most projects would have at least
a 20-day notice.
Councilmember Parks stated that the City is currently exceeding the legal requirements
for notice by two times and stated that no matter how far out the noticing goes,
complaints will be received. He stated he favored the suggestion that noticing go out
far enough to include a minimum number of residents.
Mayor Roberts said he feels if an adequate sign is posted, the radius of noticing
currently in practice should be adequate:.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Mu~oz to
approve noticing at a 600 foot radius with the further requirement that in rural, or less
dense areas, no fewer than 30 neighboring property owners are to be noticed. Timing
for the posting of properties is to continue to be pursuant to code requirements.
Homeowners Associations in close proximity of the property:are to be noticed and the
mailing labels .are to be generated, using the method staff determines to be the most
effective. The property signs are to be designed and constructed consistent with the
exhibit showing the proposed use and hearing date.
:
The motion was unanimously carried with Mayor Pro Tem Stone absent.
23.
Status Reoort on Winchester Interchanae, Overland BridQe, Winchester/Nicolas
Sionalization, Right Turn Lane at Pala Road/Hiohwav 79 South, and Margarite Road
WideninQ North of Rancho California Road
Minutes\5%10%94 -9- 05/31/94
City Council Minutes
24.
25.
May 10. 1994
Director of Public Works Tim Serlet presented the status report.
It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Parks to receive
and file report. The motion was unanimously carried with Mayor Pro Tem Stone
absent.
Temecula Town Association Assistance
It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Parks to
continue the item to the meeting of May 24, 1994.
The motion carried by the 'following vote:
AYES: 3 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Parks, Roberts
NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: I COUNCILMEMBERS: Stone
ABSTAIN: I COUNCILMEMBERS: Mu~oz
Abatement of Hazardous VeQetation from Vacant Lots or Parcels as oer Ordinance 91 -
18. Chanter 6.16
Chief Building Official Tony Elmo presented the staff report.
It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Parks to
approve staff recommendation as follows:
25.1 Set a public hearing for May 24, 1994 to confirm the cost of hazardous
vegetation abatement.
The motion was unanimously carried with Mayor Pro Tem Stone absent.
CITY MANAGER REPORTS
City Manager Ron Bradley welcomed Peter Thorson who has been appointed City Attorney for
the City of Temecula.
.,
CITY ATTORNEY REPORTS
City Attorney Thorson stated he is pleased to be here and has enjoyed his first coups of days
as City Attorney.
Minutes%5\10%94 -1 O- 05/31/94
CiW Council Minutes May 10. 1994
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Mufloz to adjourn at
10:00 PM to a meeting on May 23, 1994, 8:30 AM, Joint Workshop between the Cities of
Temecula and Murrieta and the Economic Development Corporation, at the Temecula Creek
Inn. The motion was unanimously carried with Mayor Pro Tem Stone absent.
ATTEST:
Ron Roberts, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
Mi nutes\5~l 0~94 - 11 - 05/31/94
MINUTES OF A SPECIAL MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
HELD JOINTLY WITH THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MURRIETA
AND THE TEMECULA/MURRIETA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (EDC)
MAY 23, 1994
A special meeting of the Temecula City Council was called to order at 8:50 AM, at the
Temecula Creek Inn, Temecula, California.
PRESENT 3 COUNCILMEMBERS: Stone, Parks, Roberrs
ABSENT: 2 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Mu~oz
Also present was City Manager Ronald E. Bradley of the City of Temecula, Jack Smith of the
City of Murrieta and Carliene M. Anderson, President of the Temecula-Murrieta Economic
Development Corporation.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
No public comments were offered at this time.
COUNCIL BUSINESS
1. Economic DevelOPment Workshop
A workshop dealing with economic development in the region comprised of the Cities
of Temecula and Murrieta and unincorporated areas of Southwest Riverside County
was led by Steve PonTell. Mr. PonTell is a senior fellow of the Center for the New
West, an economic development "think tank" serving the Western United States.
Discussion of past efforts and future goals of EDC was held. Direction was given to
EDC to make a formal request to the City Council regarding funding.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjpurned at 11: 12 AM.
ATTEST:
Ron Roberts, Mayor
Ronald E. Bradley, City Manager
Minutes 5123/94 -1- 05131/94
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE
TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
MAY 24, 1994
A regular meeting of the Temecula City Council was called to order on Tuesday, May 24,
1994, 5:30 P.M., at the Temecula Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista
Road, Temecula, California, Mayor Ron Roberrs presiding.
PRESENT: 5
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Munoz, Parks, Stone,
Roberrs
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Also present were City Manager Ron Bradley, :Assistant City Attorney Cheryl Kane, and
Deputy City Clerk Susan Jones.
EXECUTIVE SESSION
A meeting of the City of Temecula City Council was called to order at-5:30 P.M. It was
moved by Mayor Pro Tem Stone, seconded by Councilmember Parks to adjourn to
Executive Session pursuant to Government Code §54957.6, CONFERENCE WITH LABOR
NEGOTIATOR, Agency negotiator: Harwood Edvalson and Grant Yates. Employee
organization: Teamsters Local 911, representing General and Professional\Confidential
employee groups; Government Code §54957, to discuss Public Employee Appointment:
City Manager Recruitment; and Section 54956.9(b) Conference with Legal Counsel -
Anticipated Litigation in two matters. The motion was unanimously carried.
The meeting was reconvened at regular session at 7:15 P.M.
INVOCATION
The invocation was given by Father Ed Renner, St. Thomas Episcopal Church.
FLAG SALUTE
Mayor Pro Tern Stone led the flag salute.
City Manager Ron Bradley stated the City Council meet in closed session to discuss Labor
Negotiations and recruitment of the new City Manager.
PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS
Mayor Roberts proclaimed the week of May 22.- May 28 to be "Volunteer Police Officers
Week". '
Mayor Roberrs proclaimed the week of May 23 - May 27 to be "American Heritage Week".
CCMINOSI24/94 1 O6101194
TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES MAY 24, 1994
City Finance Officer Mary Jane Henry presented the City Council with the GFOA
Distinguished Budget Presentation Award granted to the City of Temecula for 1993-1994.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Mayor Pro Tem Stone thanked the City of Temecula Police Volunteers and the City of
Temecula Finance Department for their hard Work.
Councilmember Parks thanked the City of Temecula Finance Department.
Councilmember Parks stated he feels there has been an influx of window painting and
window advertising end the Temporary Sign Ordinance suspension time period has expired.
He asked staff to bring this back to the City Council for review.
Councilmember Munoz expressed his appreciation for being able to participate in the Sister
City signing ceremony in Japan.
Mayor Roberts said he also appreciated the opportunity to attend the ceremony. Mayor
Roberts said the newest sister city, Nakayama, Japan has the same vision as the City of
Temecula. He then presented the Official Proclamation to the Deputy City Clerk to be
displayed at Temecula City Hall.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Mayor Pro Tem Stone stated he would abstain on Consent Calendar Item No. 13.
Councilmember Munoz stated he would abstain on Consent Calendar Items No. 4, 5, 6 and
8.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Stone to approve
Consent Calendar Items 1 - 13.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES:
5 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Munoz, Parks, Stone, Roberts
NOES: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: ' 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
CCMIN05124/94 2 06/01194
TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
1.
Standard Ordinance Adootion Procedure
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1
MAY 24, 1994
Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions
included in the agendao
Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve the minutes of April 26~ 1994;
2.2 Approve the minutes of May 2, 1994.
Resolution ADoroving List of Demands
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 94-50
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
Final Vestino Tract MaD No. 24135
(Located east of Margarita Road and south of Santiago Road)
4.1 Approve Final Vesting Tract Map No. 24135 subject to the Conditions of
Approval.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Parks, Stone, Roberrs
NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSTAIN: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS': Munoz
CCMIN05124194 3 06/01194
TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
5.
MAY 24, 1994
Final Vestino Tract Mao No. 24135-2
(Located east of Margarita Road and north of De Portola Road)
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1 Approve Final Vesting Tract Map No. 24135-2 subject to the Conditions of
Approval.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Parks, Stone, Roberts
NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSTAIN: I COUNCILMEMBERS: Munoz
e
Final VestinQ Tract Mao No. 24131-2
(Located west of Meadows Parkway and south of Pauba Road)
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1 Approve Final Vesting Tract Map No. 24131-2 subject to the Conditions of
Approval.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Acceptance Into the City-Maintained Storm Drain System - Storm Drain Facilities
Within a Portion of Lot 273 of Tract Mao 3883 (APN 919-200-01 0) Abuttinq Call~
Fiesta '
RECOMMENDATION:
7o Adopt a resolution entitled:
Birdsall, Parks, Stone, Roberts
None
None
Munoz
CCMIN05124194 4 06/01/94
TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
10.
MAY 24, 1994
RESOLUTION NO. 94-51
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA,
CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING INTO THE CITY-MAINTAINED STORM DRAIN
SYSTEM - STORM DRAIN FACILITIES WITHIN A PORTION OF LOT 273 OF
TRACT MAP 3883 (APN 919-200-010) ABUTTING CALLE FIESTA
Final Parcel MaD No. 27239
(Located on the westerly side of Ynez Road between Winchester Road and Rancho
Way)
RECOMMENDATION:
8.1 Approve Final Parcel Map No. 27239 subject to the Conditions of Approval.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Parks, Stone, Roberts
NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSTAIN: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Munoz
Solicitation of Construction Bids for the Modification of the Traffic Siqnal & Strioinq
at the Intersection of Rancho California Road and Front Street (Project No. PW94-
09)
RECOMMENDATION:
9.1
Approve the construction plans and specifications and authorize the'
Department of Public Works to solicit public construction bids for providing
and installing detector loops and re-striping on the northerly approach of
Front Street at Rancho California Road.
Acceptance Of Maintenance Easements on Ynez Road adjacent to Tower Plaza and
Town Center for Traffic SiQnal Maintenance Within CFD 88-12
RECOMMENDATION:
10.1
Authorize the Mayor to execute the Agreement and Grant of Easements with
the property owners along Ynez Road accepting easements for Traffic Signal
Maintenance.
CCMINOSI24/94 5 O6101194
TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES MAY 24, 1994
10.2 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 94-52
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA,
CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE GRANT OF EASEMENTS FOR TRAFFIC
SIGNAL MAINTENANCE ON YNEZ ROAD ADJACENT TO TOWER PLAZA
AND TOWN CENTER
11.
Rancho California Road Interchange Improvements. Caltrans CooPerative Design
Aareement
RECOMMENDATION:
11.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 94-53
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVING COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT NO. 8-794, BETWEEN THE STATE
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR
DESIGN OF THE RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD INTERCHANGE
IMPROVEMENTS
12.
Overland Drive Overcrossing Improvements, Caltrans Cooperative Desian
Aqreement
RECOMMENDATION:
12.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 94-54
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVING COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT NO. 8-793, BETWEEN THE STATE
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR
DESIGN OF THE OVERLAND DRIVE OVERCROSSING IMPROVEMENTS
SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES
13. Ordinance No. 94-14 "
RECOMMENDATION:
13.1 Read by title only and adopt an ordinance entitled:
CCMIN05124/94 6 06/01/94
TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES MAY 24, 1994
ORDINANCE NO. 94-14
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
AMENDING THE LAND USE CODE REGARDING THE TERM OF
CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS, PUBLIC USE PERMITS AND PLOT PLANS
The motion was carried by' the following vote:
AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Munoz, Park, Roberts
NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
XBSTAIN: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Stone
PUBLIC HEARINGS
14.
Abatement of Hazardous Veoetation from Vacant Lots or Parcels oer Ordinance 91-
18, Chaoter 6.16
Chief Building Official Tony Elmo presented the staff report.
Mayor Pro Tem Stone asked who would be monitoring the properties scheduled to
be disked to ensure no endangered wildlife is disturbed.
Tony Elmo explained the Code Enforcement Officer is working with the Planning
Department to monitor the properties to ensure compliance.
Fire Chief Jim Wright explained how properties are determined to require weed
abatement.
Mayor Roberts opened the public hearing at 7:45 P.M. Hearing no requests to
speak, the public hearing was closed at 7:45 P.M.
It was moved by Councilmember Munoz, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Stone to
approve staff recommendation as follows:
RECOMMENDATION:
14.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 94-55
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ORDERING CONFIRMATION OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AGAINST
CCMIN05124/94 7 06/01194
TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES MAY 24, 1994
PARCELS OF LAND 'WITHIN THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR COSTS OF
ABATEMENT AND REMOVAL OF HAZARDOUS WEEDS
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Munoz, Parks, Stone,
Roberts
None
None
COUNCIL BUSINESS
15. Temecula Town Association Assistance
Community Services Director Shawn Nelson presented the staff report. He
recommended the City Council establish criteria to deal with future requests for
funding assistance from the City Council.
Councilmember Munoz asked why a current appraisal was not submitted with the
staff report.
Finance Officer Mary Jane Henry said staff did not want to spend City funds on an
appraisal if there was not Council approval for the request.
Director Nelson said any loan would be contingent upon an updated appraisal.
Councilmember Birdsall said in the past she has abstained from agenda items which
pertained to the Temecula Town Association (TTA), however, she no longer
receives income from the Association and has not received an income for over one
year.
Councilmember Munoz said he feels it is inappropriate for Councilmember Birdsall to
vote on this item because of her close association in the past with the TTA.
Mayor Pro Tem Stone said he also feels Councilmember Birdsall should step down
on this issue.
Councilmember Parks said he respects C.ouncilmember Birdsall's desire to vote on
the issue. '
Mayor Roberts said he could not ask Councilmember Birdsall to step down when he
has been allowed to vote on Balloon and Wine Festival issues, whose Board of
Directors he serves on.
CCMIN05/24/94
O6/01/94
TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES MAY 24, 1994
Councilmember Birdsall announced she would voluntarily abstain on this issue.
Barbara Pearson, 30150 Via Monterey, Temecula, provided a history of the
Temecula Town Association and the work they do in the City of Temecula. She
explained the TTA currently has outstanding loans at $200,000 and $50,000, both
at 10% interest. She said the purpose of this request is to allow the association to
repay those loans and save 5%.
Councilmember Munoz asked how much the cost overruns were for the additional
1,000 square feet added to the community center on Pujol street during
reconstruction.
Ms. Pearson said she did not have that figure.
Philip Hoxey, 43318 Cielo De Azul, Temecula, expressed his concern regarding the
lending of City funds. Mr. Hoxey suggested if the City has money to lend, they
should cut taxes or use the funds to improve roads and build a fire station on the
East side of the freeway.
Mayor Pro Tem Stone said he supports the TTA and the work they do in the City.
He said he feels it is in the best interest of the City Council to assist the TTA,
however, he suggested the Council consider a loan for $50,000 and a loan for
$18,000 for seed money to operate the annual Temecula Tractor Race.
Councilmember Munoz said he supports TTA efforts, however, he objects to the
way the proposal was presented. Councilmember Munoz said he feels the Council
should not consider themselves responsible for assisting other organizations in
financial trouble.
Councilmember Parks said the TTA has paid cash for everything in the past and
they have not come before the City Council and asked for assistance. He said he
feels the interest rate should be increased to 6%' to cover the cost of staff time.
Mayor Roberts said he feels the request for $250,000 is excessive and would
support the recommendation by Mayor Pro Tem Stone to lend $68,000.
Councilmember Parks said he will support Mayor Pro Tem Stone's recommendation
if he agrees to amend it by increasing the interest to 6%. Mayor Pro Tem Stone
concurred and'asked staff to incorporate an acceleration clause so that, when the
TTA property currently offered for sale is sold, the funds go directly to pay down
the I st trust deed. At the recommendation of Community Services Director Shawn
Nelson, Mayor Pro Tem Stone amended the motion to make the loan contingent
upon a current low-cost appraisal and directed staff to develop criteria for future
requests for community services funding assistance.
CCMIN05124194 9 06/01/94.
TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
The motion was carried by the following vote:
MAY 24, 1994
AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Munoz, Parks, Stone, Roberts
NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSTAIN: I COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall
Mayor Roberts declared a recess at 9:00 P.M. The City Council was reconvened in regular
session after the TCSD and RDA meetings at 9:23 P.M.
16. Review and Adoorion of the Prooosed Fiscal Year 1994-95 Ooeratinq Budqet -
City Manager Ron Bradley presented the staff report.
Finance Officer Mary Jane Henry reviewed the Annual Operating Budget.
Mayor Pro Tem Stone suggested the following adjustments to the budget:
Reduce Auto mileage allowance for City Councilmembers, by 9900.00
Delete One (1) City Manager trip, a reduction of 91,000.00
A 10% reduction in allocation for legal fees
Reduce the duplication of subscriptions to the Kiplinger Letter in the Finance
Department and the Community Services Department.
Mayor Pro Tem Stone expressed concern regarding a significant increase in the cost
for animal control services and suggested staff research the cost of other
companies which provide those services.
Councilmember Munoz expressed his support for Mayor Pro Tem Stone's
recommendation. Councilmember Munoz said he would support additional
reductions in City Manager trips. He said he would rather see the City Manager
present in the City. Councilmember Munoz said he would like Police Chief Rick
Sayre to have the opportunity to come forward with a request for an increase in
staffing, especially in the area of motor officers. Councilmember Munoz said he
would like see'the economic uncertainty designation fund balance doubled.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, .seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Stone to
approve staff recommendation with follo~ving amendments: remove 9900 from City
Council Mileage, remove 91,000 from City Manager travel, cut legal expenses by
10% or 930,000, cancel one subscription of the Kiplinger Letter, research costs of
Animal Control to see if it is more economical to use a private contractor, increase
the economic uncertainty designation fund balance of 1.2 million to 2.4 million, and
CCM IN05/24/94 10 O6/01194
TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES MAY 24, 1994
add another motor officer to police staff if deemed necessary by the'Police Chief
and approve staff recommendation 16.2 and 16.3 as follows:
16.2 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION N0.94-56
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA,
CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE FISCAL YEAR 1994-95 OPERATING BUDGET
16.3 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 94-57
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA,
CALIFORNIA REVISING THE SCHEDULE OF AUTHORIZED POSITIONS
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Munoz, Parks, Stone,
Roberts
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Mayor Roberrs recessed the regular meeting at 10:05 P.M. to the TCSD meeting. The
regular meeting was reconvened at 10:05 P.M.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Stone to extend the
meeting at 10:05 to 10:30 P.M. The motion carried with Councilmember Birdsall in
opposition to the extension.
17. Community Services Commission ADoointment
Deputy City Clerk Susan Jones presented the staff report.
Mayor Pro Terh Stone advised the Councilmembers that applicant Sam Kennedy
was unaware he must reside within the City limits to serve on a Commission,
therefore because he is building a home .outside the City limits he is not eligible to
serve on the Community Services Commission and has withdrawn his application.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Stone to
appoint Rich Soltysiak to fill the unexpired term of Evelyn Harker on the Community
Services Commission.
CCMIN05124/94 11 06/01194
TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS:
MAY 24, 1994
18.
19.
Birdsall, Munoz, Parks, Stone,
Roberrs
NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
CFD 88-12 (Ynez Corridor) - Construction of Storm Drain on the South Side of
Solana Way from Ynez Road to Western of Marqarita Road
Director of Public Works Tim Serlet presented the staff report.
It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Stone to
approve staff recommendation, Option No. 2, to construct the 78" storm drain with
Bond proceeds but not to provide sales tax reimbursement for the debt service
associated with the storm drain.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Munoz, Parks, Stone,
Roberts
None
None
Consideration of Ordinance Reaulatina Tax Cab Service
Councilmember Birdsall suggested this item be continued unless it was an urgent
matter.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Stone to
consider this item as an urgency.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS:'
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Munoz, Parks, Stone,
Roberts
None
None
CCMIN05124194 12 06/01194
TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES MAY 24. 1994
Assistant City Manager Woody Edvalson presented the staff report. He advised
Council of the following amendments to the Ordinances:
Page 8, Section 12.08.618 (B) 1. and 2.: amended to include "or comparable
violations in other jurisdictions".
Page 9,' Section 12.08.620 (A): amended to read "...appeal such action(s)
under Section 5~04.200 of the Temecula Municipal Code" and deleting
Section 12.08.620 (B)-(E). Making the appeal process the same as for
business licenses.
Page 9, Section 12.08.621 (A) i.: amended to read "twelve (12) hours of
such duty time".
Councilmember Parks said he is willing to approve an urgency ordinance, however,
he would like time to review the permanent ordinance prior to approving it.
Ed Dool, representing Temecula Shuttle, 28657 Front Street, Temecula, expressed
support of the Taxi-Cab ordinance.
Alfred Persson, 147 S. Juanira, Hemet, representing Yellow Cab, expressed his
support of the ordinance, however, he said he feels the insurance requirement is
excessive. He said the insurance requirements for most other cities is $750,000
aggregate.
David Terry, 29480 City Circle, Romoland, told the Council the insurance
requirements are very prohibitive and a driver must have a clean record or the
insurance companies will not insure them.
Bob Mobley, Quality Taxi, advised the City Council they should not be concerned
about being harmed in a lawsuit. Mr. Mobley said he feels the insurance
requirements 8r6 excessive.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Munoz to
approve the urgency ordinance with the modification that the City establish a rate
for insurance not higher than the rate required by the County of Riverside and
directed that the permanent ordinance have a provision which repeals the urgency
ordinance.
RECOMMENDATION:
19.1 Adopt an urgency ordinance entitibd:
ORDINANCE NO. 94-15
AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CCMIN05124194 13 06/01194
TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
19.2
MAY 24, 1994
TEMECULA ADDING CHAFFER 12.08 TO THE MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING
TO TAXI CABS
Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 94-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ADDING CHAFFER 12.08 TO THE MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO TAXI
CABS
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Munoz to
approve staff recommendation 19.3 as follows:
19.3
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 94-58
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ESTABLISHING FEES AND CHARGES ASSOCIATED WITH CHAPTER 12.08
OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO TAXI CABS
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Munoz, Parks, Stone,
Roberts
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS: None
COUNCILMEMBERS: None
City Manager Ron Bradley advised the public that taxi cab permits should be applied for at
the Southwest Police Station beginning Wednesday, May 25, 1994.
DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS
None
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
None
CCMINO5124194 14 06101194
TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT
None
MAY 24, 1994
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Councilmember Munoz, seconded by Councilmember Parks to adjourn at
10:45 P.M.
The next regular meeting of the Temecula City Council will be held on Tuesday, June 14,
1994, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center; 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula,
California.
ATTEST:
Mayor Ron Roberts
June S. Greek, City Clerk
CCMIN05124194 15 06/01194
''M
NO. 3
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA AtJ~)WING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND
DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN ~HBIT A
THE CITY COUNCIL .OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE,
DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A have been
audited by the City Manager, and that the same are hereby allowed in the amount of
$1,465,494.51.
Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOFrED, this 14th day of/une, 1994.
ATTEST:
Ron Roberrs, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALrFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE)
CITY OF TtEVlECUI,A)
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby do certify that the
foregoing Resolution No. 94-- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the
City of Temecula on the 14th. day of June, 1994. by the following roll call vote:
AYES: 0 COUNCIL1VIEMBERS: None
NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCIL.MEMBERS: None
June S. Greek, City Clerk
terns 20 2
CITY OF TEMECULA
LIST OF DEMANDS
~,119/94 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
05126/94 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
06/02/94 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
06114/94 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
06/14/g4 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
05/1g/94 TOTAL PAYRCU...:
06/02/94 TOTAL PAYROLL:
TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 06/14/94 COUNCIL MEETING:
DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND:
CHECKS:
001 GENERAL $497,628.75
100 GAS TAX $42,849.60
165 RDA-LOW/MO0 $3,7~5.41
190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT $102,813.78
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A $14.238.04
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B $14,955.88
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C $25,066.86
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ (CIP) $37,461
250 TCSD-CIP $45,963.50
-"~0 RDA*CIP $235,305.91
SELF-INSURANCE $10,593.26
.,.. VEHICLES $480.00
320 INFORMATIONS SYSTEMS $16,908,30
330 COPY CENTER $3,895.50
340 FACILITIES $37,797.80
380 RDA-DEBT SERVICE $150,073.00
390 TCSD DEBT SERVICE $10.00
PAYROLL:
001 GENERAL (PAYROLL) $132,835.29
100 ' GAS TAX (PAYROLL) $33,840.48
190 TCSD (PAYROLL) $41,614.57
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A (PAYROLL) $1)04.90
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B (PAYROLL} 1689.36
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C (PAYROLL) $3,482.40
280 RDA-CIP 1674.77
300 SELF-INSURANCE (PAYROLL) $1,117.72
320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS (PAYRDLL) $2,677.45
330 COPY CENTER (PAYROLL) $1,353.97
340 FACIUTIES $3.268.03
$151;,884.ea
$391,885,82
$183,517.53
$80,252.33
$445.295.20
$109,889.20
$114,789.74
$1,465,49,1.51
$1,240,835.57
$224,658.94
$1,485,49'1.51
FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
FOLLOWING I,S TRUE AND CORRECT
/OUCHRE2 PAGE 9
35/19/9t, 11
CITY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
100 GAS TAX FUND
190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
19] TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND
280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP
]00 INSURANCE FUND
320 [NFORHATION SYSTEMS
]30 COPY CENTER FUND
340 FACILITIES
390 TCSD DEBT SERVICE
TOTAL
AHOUNT
97,335.3~
11,119.0~,
26,536.29
926.86
19].77
4,6/,0.19
2,~1~.16
9,6~3.0Z
~,575.66
~91.67
1,400.46
10.00
159,88~.69
VOUCHRE2 PAGE 1
05/le' 11:47
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
15017
15018
15018
15019
15043
15044
15045
317532
317532
317532
317532
317532
317532
317532
317532
317535
317
31~.
317532
317532
317532
317532
317532
317532
317532
317532
317532
317532
317532
378609
378609
378609
378609
378609
378609
378609
378609
378609
378609
378609
378609
378609
378609
37P
CHECK
DATE
05/13/94
05/13/94
05/13/94
05/13/94
05/16/94
05/17/94
05/17/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
'05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
VENDOR
NUMBER
001~49
001036
001036
00O837
000154
000230
000680
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
VENDOR
N/tHE
CALIFORNIA DEBT LIMIT
KEMPER REAL ESTATE NANA
KEMPER REAL ESTATE HANA
CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TA
CSMFO
MUNI FINANCIAL SERVICES
AMS-TMS
FIRSTAX CIRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX CIRS)
FIRSTAX (ZRS)
FIRSTAX CIRS)
FIRSTAX (ZRS)
FIRSTAX (ZRS)
FIRSTAX CIRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FZRSTAXCIRS)
FIRSTAX CIRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EpD)
FIRSTAX CEDD)
FIRSTAX CEDe)
FIRSTAX CEDD)
FIRSTAX CEDD)
FIRSTAX CEDD3
FIRSTAX CEDD)
FIRSTAX CEDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX CEDD)
FIRSTAX CEDD)
FIRSTAX CEDD)
FIRSTAX CEDD)
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
IDB APPLICATION FEE
BRADLEY & STONE HOTEL
BRADLEY & STONE HOTEL
1992 FORM 199
1994 LEGISLATIVE SEMINA
POSTAGE/PUBLIC HEARINGS
POSTAGE/~/EED ABATEMENT
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000285 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MED1CARE
00028,.'~ MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 . MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDIF.,ARE
000444 SDI
000444 SDZ
000444 SDI
000444 SOl
000444 SOl
000444 SDX
000444 SDI
000444 SOZ ,,
000444 SDI
000444 SDI
000444 SDI
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-140-999-5248
001-100-999-5258
001-110-999-5258
390-199-999-5227
001-140-999-5258
190-180-999-5230
001-162-999-5230
001-2070
100-2070
190-2070
191-2070
192-2070
193-2070
280-2070
300-2070
320-2070
330-2070
340-207O
001-2070
100-2070
190-2070
191-2070
192-2070
193-2070
280-2070
300-2070
320-2070
330-2070
340-2070
001-2070
100-2070
190-2070
191-2070
192-2070
193-2070
280-2070
300-2070
320-2070
330-2070
340-2070
001-2070
100-2070
190-2070
191-2070
ITEM
AMOUNT
300.00
138.00
207.00
10.00
65.00
4,249.66
1,600.00
9,324.93
2,917.12
2,689.79
82.55
44.11
245.04
160.90
77.87
246.24
89.27
82.02
2,397.22
633.80
734.26
17.07
26.54
61.29
34.74
20.43
54.08
22.86
53.14
1,060.96
266.55
329.18
7.66
11.90
27.47
15.57
9.15
24.25
10.25
23.82
2,385.03
704.20
523.28
20.96
CHECK
AMOUNT
300.00
'345.00
10.00
65.00
4,249.66
1,600.00
20,015.27
VOUCHRE2
05/19/94
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUNBER
1506~
1506~
1506~
'15064
1506~
15065
11:47
CHECK VENDOR VENDOR
DATE NUMBER NAME
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
00012]
000123
00012]
000123
000123
BURKE WXLL]AMS & SORENS
BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENS
BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENS
BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENS
BURKE W[LLIAMS & SORENS
001021 CALIF GANG INVESTIGATOR
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT
NLINBER
PROF SERVICES/MAR 94
PROF SERVICES/MAR 94
CREDIT/FUNDS NOT BUDGET
RDA MARCH LEGAL SERV.
MARCH LEGAL SERVICE
001-130-999-52~6
190-180-999-52~6
300-199-999-5207
280-199-999-5246
001-130-999-5246
REGISTRATION FEE
001-170-999-5261
15066 05/19/94 000857 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TA 0008~7 FRAN TAX 001-2140
15066 05/19/94 000837 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TA 0008~7 FRAN TAX 100-2140
15067
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
15068
15068
15068
15p68
15069
15070
15070
15070
15070
15070
15070
15070
15070
15070
15070
15070
15070
000473 CALIFORNIA REDEVELOPHEN
000137 CHEVRON U.S,A. INC.
000137 CHEVRON U,S.A, INC.
000137 CHEVRON U.S,A, INC.
000137 CHEVRON U,S.A. INC.
000489 COBB GROUP THE
001193 COMP USA, INC.
001193 COMP USA, INC.
001193 COMP USA, 1NC,
001193 COHP USA, INC,
001193 COMP USA, INC,
OO1193 CONP USA, INC,
001193 COMP USA, INC.
001193 CONP USA, INC.
001193 CONP USA, INC.
001193 CONP USA# INC.
001193 CONP USA, INC.
001193 COMP USA, INC.
001273 COHPUSERV, INC.
000447 COMTRONIX OF HEMET
0004~7 CONTRONIX OF HEMET
000/~,7 CONTRONIX OF HEMET
1994 ANNUAL CONF/MCLARN 001-140-999-5258
789-819-697-2 GAS CARD
789-819-697-2 GAS CARD
789-819-697-2 GAS CARD
789-819-697-2 GAS CARO
001-110-999-526~
001-170-999-5262
190-180-999-5263
001-161-999-5262
PARADOX USERS JOURNAL 320-199-999-5228
RETURNED 2 PRAC FAX ME
SEKUR]T CABLE SYSTEM
TAX
281362 HP DESKJET 520 P
/,81661 HP DESKJET BLK I
FREIGHT
TAX
PRAC FAX ME
15071
15072
15072
15072
15073
15074
15075
15076
15077
15078
320-199-999-5~.1
320-199-999-5221
320-199-999-5Z21
001-171-999-5221
001-171-999-5221
001-171-999-5221
001-171-999-5221
320-199-999-5Z21
COMPUTER SOFTWARE & SUP 320-199-999-5221
530580 3COM ETHERLINK 1 320-199-999-5221
FREIGHT 320-199-999-5221
TAX 320-199-999-5221
APRIL SERVICE
320-199-999-5228
RECHARGEABLE NICKEL CAD
TAX
ANTENNA
001-171-999-5242
001-171-999-5242
320-199-999-5209
COMYNS, JO~ELYN COMYNS/REFUND 190'183-4982
001014 COUNTRY SIGNS & DESIGNS
001029 DATAQUICK
DAVIES, MARILYNN
001454 DISNEYLAND HOTEL
001455 ELECTRICAL CONCEPTS, IN
RIVERTON PARK SIGN 190-180-999-5244
DATA SERVICES
DAViES/REFUND
320-199-999-5250
190-185-4982
HAFELI/2 NIGHTS HOTEL 320-199-999-5258
RELOCATE POWER POLE 340-199-999-5212
ITEM
AMOUNT
22,553.92
1,038.00
21,076.38-
1,505.26
6,230.58
280.00
46.86
46,87
240.00
17.78
48.28
28.23
24.26
69.00
257,27-
112.40
7.87
277.00
132.18
14.50
28.~,
106.98
52.96
348.00
8.50
24.36
19.19
300.00
23.25
2].71
48.00
489.72
62.81
20.00
244.08
546.50
PAGE
CHECK
AMOUNT
67,059.38
280.00
93.73
240.00
118.55
69.00
856.12
19.19
346.96
48. O0
489.72
62.81
2o.00
244.08
546.50
VOUCHRE2 PAGE 2
05/19"" 11:47
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR
NUMBER DATE NUMBER
378609 05/19/94 O00z~
378609 05/19/94 0004~
378609 05/19/94 0004/,4
378609 05/19/94 000444
378609 05/19/94 000444
378609 05/19/94 00044~
378609 05/19/94 00044J+
15051 05/19/94
15052 05/19/94 001425
15053 05/19/94 000559
15054 05/19/94 001222
15054 05/19/94 001222
15054 05/19/94 001222
15054 05/19/94 001222
15054 05/19/94 001222
15054 05/19/94 001222
15055 05/19/94 000102
15G. 05/19/94 001314
15057 05/19/94 000112
15058 05/19/94 000101
15058 05/19/94 000101
15058 05/19/94 000101
15058 05/19/94 000101
15059 05/19/94 001104
15060 05/19/94 001323
15060 05/19/94 001323
15061 05/19/94 000745
15062 05/19/94 000120
15063 05/19/94 001439
15064 05/19/94 000123
15064 05/19/94 000123
15064 05/19/94 000123
15064 05/19/94 000123
15064 05/19/94 000123
15064 05/19/94 000123
15064 05/19/94 000123
15r ' 05/19/94 000123
VENDOR
NAME
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
AIRBORNE ARMS
AIRTOUCH CELLULAR - S.D
AL~S WELDING
ALPHA COMMUNICATIONS,
ALPHA COMMUNICATIONS#
ALPHA COMMUNICATIONS,
ALPHA COMMUNICATIONS,
ALPHA COMMUNICATIONS,
ALPHA COMMUNICATIONS,
AMERICAN FENCE CO. OF C
AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOC
AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOC
APPLE ONE
APPLE ONE
APPLE ONE
APPLE ONE
ARMA INTERNATIONAL
ARROUHEAD WATER
ARROWHEAD WATER
AT & T - CELLULAR
BICKNELL T~,AVEL CENTER
BRYAN~S DOG TRAINING
BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENS
BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENS
BURKE WILLIANS & SORENS
BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENS
BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENS
BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENS
BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENS
BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENS
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
AIRBORNE ARMS/REFUND
6015202/MAY
~/ELDING OF #7 BAND FILT
MONTHLY RENTAL SERVICE
MONTHLY RENTAL SERVICE
MONTHLY RENTAL SERVICE
M~NTHLY RENTAL SERVICE
MONTHLY RENTAL SERVICE
MONTHLY RENTAL SERVICE
FENCE RENTAL
APA DINNER
MEMBERSHIP/FAGAN
WE 4/16
WE 4/16
WE 4~23~94
WE 4123/94
RECORDS MGMT*SEMINXR
APRIL WTR
APRIL WATER
MARCH/APRIL SERVICES
AIRFARE TO OAKLAND/RUSE
PAYMENT TO INSTRUCTOR
PROF SERVICES/FEB 3994
PROF SERViCES/FEB t994
PROF SERVICES/FEB 1994
PROF SERVICES/FEB 1994
CREDIT/FUNDS NOT BUDGET
RETAINER SERVICE
PROF SERVICES/MAR 94
PROF SERVICES/MAR 94
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
192-2070
193-2070
280-2070
300-2070
320-2070
330-2070
340-2070
001-199-4056
320-199-999-5208
190-180-999-5212
190-180-999-5238
001-162-999-5238
320-199-999-5238
100-164-999-5238
001-170-999-5242
001-140-999-5250
190-180-999-5238
001-161-999-5260
001-161-999-5226
280-199-999-5250
001-120-999-5118
280-199-999-5250
001-120-999-5118
001-120-999-5261
340-199-999-5240
190-181-999-5240
001-140-999-5208
190-180-999-5258
190-183-999-5330
001-1280
190-180-999-5246
001-130-999-5266
300-199-999-5207
300-199-999-5207
001-130-999-5246
300-199-999-5207
001-1280
ITEM
AMOUNT
1.26
48.64
36.30
25.96
55.29
15.71
7.47
35.00
61.87
165.00
121.00
33.00
11.00
62.34
18.33
7.33
145.00
60.00
129.00
103.20
297.99
103.20
349.91
85.00
85.21
11.00
27.98
99.00
624.00
1,350.31
521.29
20,494.54
13,412.96
4,040.Q9-
3,150,00
21,076.38
843.51
CHECK
AMOUNT
5,610.86
35.00
61.87
165.00
253.00
145.00
60.00
129,00
854.30
85.00
96.21
27.98
,~oo
624.00
,OUCHRE2 PAGE
t5/19/94 11:47
/QUCHER/
:HECK
;UMBER
15079
15O79.
15079
15080-
15081
15082
15082
15082
15082
15082
15082
15082
15082
15082
15082
15082
15082
15083
15084
15084
15085
15086
15087
15087
15088
15088
15088
15088
15088
15089
15090
15091
15091
15091
15092
15093
15093
CHECK
DATE
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/1.9/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
VENDOR
NUMBER
000754
000754
000754
001056
001135
001002
001002
001002
001002
001002
001002'
001002
001002
001002
001002
001002
001002
000993
000175
000250
000250
000177
000177
000177
000177
00017'7
001355
000184
O00423
00047~
0004~'~
0003~
000194
000194
VENDOR
NAME
ELLIOTT GROUP, THE
ELLIOTT GROUP, THE
ELLIOTT GROUP, THE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
FIRST CARE INDUSTRIAL M
FIRST INTERSTATE BANK
FIRST iNTERSTATE BANK
FIRST INTERSTATE BANK
FIRST ]NTERSTATE BANK
FIRST INTERSTATE BANK
FIRST INTERSTATE BANK
FIRST INTERSTATE BANK
FIRST INTERSTATE BANK
FIRST INTERSTATE BANK
FIRST INTERSTATE BANK
FIRST INTERSTATE BANK
FIRST INTERSTATE BANK
FREEDOM COFFEE, INC.
GALICINDO,OLIVIA
GALICINDO,OLIVIA
GANZ, VICTORIA
GFOA
GLASS PLAQUES
GLASS PLAQUES
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENN[ES OFFICE PRODUCT
GTE CALIFORNI~
GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPOR
H & H CRAFT & FLORAL SU
H & H CRAFT & FLORAL SU
H & H CRAFT & FLORAL SU
ICBO
IrMA RETIREMENT TRUST 4
IC!4A RETIREMENT TRUST 4
CITY OF TEMEOULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
PLAN CK REVIEW
PLAN CK REVIEW
PLAN CHECK REVIEW SERV.
SPORTS PARK IRRIGATION
PRE-ENPLOYNENT
5475666~03910040/PB
5473666~03910081/RR
5473666403910081/RR
5473666403910107/HE
5475666~03910115/JG
5473666~03910125/GT
5473666~03910121/TE
5475666403910164/SN
547366640391016~/SM
5473666~0391016~/SM
547366640391016~/SM
5473666~0391016~/SM
MiSC. COFFEE SUPPLIES
GALICINDO/REFUND
GALICINDO/REFUND
GANZ/REFUND
GOVERNMENT BUDGETING
2407; GLASS PLAQUE 8 1/
TAX
MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES
E054030999-94118
909-694-6400 MARCH/APRI
RECREATIONAL SUPPLIES
RECREATIONAL SUPPLIES
RECREATIONAL SUPPLIES
ELECTRICAL INSPEC I/BER
000194 DEF CONP
000194 DEF COMP
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
193-180-999-5250
193-180-999-5250
193-180-999-5250
190-180-999-5212
001-150-999-5250
001-100-999-5258
001-100-999-5260
001-100-999-5258
001-110-999-5260
001-120-999-5260
001-161-999-5258
001-162-999-5260
001-100-999-5258
001-100-999-5258
001-1170
001-100-999-5258
001-100-999-5260
340-199-999-5Z50
001-199-4056
001-161-4200
190-183-4982
001-140-999-5228
001-140-999-5220
001-140-999-5220
190-180-999-5220
001-140-999-5220
190-180-999-5220
001-140-999-5220
190-180-999-5220
320-199-999-5208
320-199-999-5208
190-180-999-5301
190-180-999-5301
190-182-999-5301
001-162-999-5261
001-2080
100-2080
[TEN
AMOUNT
140.00
1,210.00
1,575.00
90.00
120.00
319.05
41.6~
617.17
39.59
35.00
42.17
53.87
470.00-
268.22
87.38
252.59
15.36
150.85
35.00
20.00
19.00
44.00
40.00
4.60
118.75
24.58
216.58
19.65
37.16
350.00
672.61
6.~4
18.41
105.74
190.00
1,237.29
398.21
CHECK
2,925.00
90.0o
120.00
1,302.0~
150.r"'
55.00
19.00
44.00
44.60
416.72
350.'00
672.61
130.59
190.00
JOUCHRF,2- PAGE 5
35/19. ]1:47
/OUCHER/
:HECK CHECK VENDOR
JUNBER DATE NUMBER
15093 05/19/94 000194
15093 05/19/94 000194
15093 05/19/94 000194
15093 05/19/94 000194
15093 05/19/94 000194
15094 05/19/94 001451
CITY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VENDOR
NAME
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
ICHA RETIREMENT TRUST 4 000194
[CMA RETIREMENT TRUST 4 000194
ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST 4 000194
ICNA RETIREMENT TRUST 4 000194
ICNA RETIREMENT TRUST 4 000194
INTEL NETPONT EXPRESS
DEF CONP
DEF COMP
DEF CONP
DEF COIqP
DEF CONP'
PRINT SERVER
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
190-2080
191-2080
193-2080
280-2080
300-2080
320-199-999-5221
15095 05/19/94 KAY, SHEREE KAY/REFUND 190-183-498Z
MISC. SUPPLIES & SERVIC
CARDSTOCK/B&S
15096 05/19/94 000206
15096 05/19/94 000206
15097 05/19/94 001123
89818 SURVEY VEST (2) X
KINKO'S OF RIVERSIDE, l
KINKO'S OF RIVERSIDE, Z
15098 05/19/94
KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIE
330-199-999-5220
001-162-999-5222
001-163-999-5218
KOERNER, KATHY KOERNER/REFUND 190-183-4982
15099 05/19/94 LEE, LAURA LEE/REFUND 190-183-4982
LABOR 320-199-999-5215
FUSER ASSEMBLY HPIIISZ 320-199-999-5215
MILEAGE 320-199-999-5215
TAX 320-199-999-5215
15100 05/19/94 000945
15100 05/19/94 000945
151r q5/19/94 000945
15~ /5/19/94 000945
15101 05/19/94
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
LPS COMPUTER SERVICE GR
LPS COMPUTER SERVICE GR
LPS COMPUTER SERVICE GR
LPS COMPUTER SERVICE GR
15102 05/19/94
15102 05/19/94
15102 05/19/94
000843 MCDANIEL ENGINEERING CO
210-165-631-5802
15103 05/19/94
15104 05/19/94
15104 05/19/94
15105 05/19/94
15106 05/19/94
15107 05/19/94
15108 05/19/94
15109 05/19/94
15110 05/19/94
15111 05/19/94 000246
15111 05/19/94 000246
151''-'t 05/19/94 000246
15 35/19/94 000246
16LCG LINE CARD FOR NEA 320-199-999-5215
SYSTEM AMP FOR NEAX 240 320-199-999-5215
001028 MEYER, CHUCK
001028 MEYER, CHUCK
001028 MEYER, CHUCK TAX 320-199-999-5215
001457 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FO GREEK/43190 001-120-999-5226
001363 NATIONAL CIVIC LEAGUE, ALL AMERICAN CITY/RUSE 190-180-999-5258
001363 NATIONAL CIVIC LEASUE, REGISTRATION FEE/SM 001-100-999-5258
OOOZ]3 NELSON, SHAWN 4/12-4/15 LEAGUE CA CIT 190-180-999-5258
NOE, CYNTHIA NOElREFUND 190-18]-4982
000239 OLSTEN TEMPORARY SERVIC WE 4/24, WE 5/01 001-162-999-5118
PACIFIC COAST EQUITIES PACIFIC COAST/REFUND 001-199-4056
001452 PARC OAKLAND HOTEL RUSE/HOTEL 3 NIGHT~ 190-180-999-5258
PEARSON, ROLAND PEARSON/REFUND 190-183'4986
PERS EMPLOYEES~ RETIREM 000246 PER REDE 001-2130
PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 PER REDE 100-2130
PERS EMPLOYEES# RETIREM 000246 PERS RET 001-Z~90
PERS EMPLOYEES~ RETIREM 000246 PERS RET 100-2390
ITEM
AMOUNT
496.96
34.08
41.66
5.00
25.36
323.25
19.00
34.26
32.16
24.78
35.00
20.00
60,00
279.00
10.00
19.53
350.00
50.00
31.00
45.00
50.00
SO.O0
3.49
48.00
582.40
35.00
249,75
56.00
107.35
107.35
10,156.10
2,752.34
CHECK
AMOUNT
2,238.56
323.25
19.00
66.42
24.78
35.00
20.00
368.53
999,25
431.00
45.00
100.00
3.49
48.00
582,40
35.00
249,75
56.00
~/OUCHRE2
35/19/94
VOUCHER/
:HECK
NUMBER
15111
15111
15111
15111
15111
15111
15111
15111
15111
15111
15111
15111
15111
15111
15111
15111
15111
15111
15111
15111
15112
15112
15112
15112
15112
15112
15112
15112
15112
15112
15112
15112
15112
15113
15114
15114
15115
15115
15115
15116
15117
15118
15119
11:47
CHECK
DATE
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19194
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19194
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
VENDOR
NUMBER
000246
000246
0002~6
000246
000246
000246
0002~6
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000254
000255
000255
000262
000262
000262
001046
000352
000499
001122
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VENDOR
NAME
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246
PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246
PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246
PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM '000246
PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246
PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246
PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 0002~6
PERS EMPLOYEES~ RETIREN 000246
PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246
PERS EMPLOYEES~ RET]REM 000246
PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246
PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246
PERS EMPLOYEES~ RETIREM 000246
PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246
PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246
PERS EMPLOYEES~ RETIREM 000246
PERS EMPLOYEESf RETIREM 000246
PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246
PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246
PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246
PERS RET
PERS RET
PERS RET
PERS RET
PER$ RET
PERS RET'
PERS RET
PERS RET
PERS RE'f
SURVIVOR
SURV l VOR
SURV I VOR
SURVIVOR
SURVIVOR
SURV I VOR
SURVIVOR
SURV I VOR
SURVIVOR
SURVIVOR
SURVIVOR
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
CASH REIMBURSEMENT
CASH REIMBURSEMENT
CASH REIMBURSEMENT
CASH REIMBURSEMENT
CASH REIMBURSEMENT
CASH REIMBURSEMENT
CASH REIMBURSEMENT
CASH REIMBURSEMENT
CASH REIMBURSEMENT
CASH REIMBURSEMENT
CASH REIMBURSEMENT
CASH REIMBURSEMENT
CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PRESS-ENTERPRISE CONPAN DISPLAY AD FOR CONMUNZT
PRO LOCK & KEY
PRO LOCK &-KEY
RANCHO CALIFORNIA MATER
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER
REXON, FREEDMAN, KLEPET
LOCKSMITH SERVICES FOR
LOCKSMITH SERVICES FOR
3/16-4/20
3/16/4/20
3/16-4/20
APRIL LEGAL SERVICES
RIVERSIDE COUNTY ASSESS 21 NAP COPIES
SCCCA
CITY CLERK BUSINESS MTG
SCOTCH PAINT CORPORATIO 5 GALLON RECYCLE PAINT
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
190-2390
191-2390
192-2390
193-2390
280-2390
300-2390
320-Z~90
330-2390
340-2390
001-2390
100-2390
190-2390
191-2390
192-2390
193-2390
280-2390
300-2390
320-2390
330-2390
340-2390
001-120-999-5220
001-140-999-5258
001-150-999-5260
001-161-999-5260
001-162-999-52~8
001-163-999-5268
190-183-999-5320
190-183-999-5310
190-180-999-5262
190-180-999-5301
320-199-999-5221
320-199-999-5260
320-199-999-5242
001-120-999-5254
190-180-999-5212
190-180-999-5212
193-180-999-5240
191-180-999-5240
190-180-999-5240
001-130-999-5247
190-180-999-5224
001-120-999-5260
100-16~-999-5218
ITEM
AMOUNT
2,537.05
80 · 06
96.57
284.39
155.59
95.94
2~2.35
104.86
222.10
47.82
12.54
13.95
.42
.93
1.~.
.56
.46
.93
.93
1.86
16.70
.90
10.54
~.~
42.80
6.47
5.~
34.09
38.86
9.~
45.05
12.00
37.25
57.60
17.78
6.47
981.18
53.51
145.55
626.15
10.50
25.00
61.87
PAGE
CHECK
AMOUNT
16,993.89
284.12
57.60
24.25
1,180;24
626.15
10.50
25.00
VOUCHRE2- PAGE 7
05/19 11:47
VOUCHER/
~HECK
NUMBER
15120
15120
15121
15122
15122
15122
1512~
15124
15124
15124
15124
15124
15124
15125
15125
15125
151"
151
15125
15126
15126
15126
15126
15126
15126
15126
15126
15126
15126
15126
15126
15126
15127
15128
15128
15129
15129
15129
15129
15129
151'~:~
15
CHECK
DATE
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/.19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
q5/19/94
,5/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94'
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05119194
05119194
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
35/19/94
VENDOR
NUMBER
000285
000285
000554
000554
000554
000519
000374
000374
000374
000374
000374
000374
000375
000375
000375
000375
000375
000375
000294
000294
000294
000294
000294
000294
000294
000294
000294
000294
000294
000294
000294
000752
000574
000574
000303
000303
000303
000303
000303
000303
000303
VENDOR
NAME
SIR SPEEDY
SIR SPEEDY
SLATER, MARTHA
SMITH BROS. TEAM SPORTS
SMITH BROS, TEAM SPORTS
SMITH BROS. TEAM SPORTS
SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TEL
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TEL
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TEL
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TEL
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TEL
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TEL
STATE COMPENSATION INS.
STATE COMPENSATION INS.
STATE COMPENSATION INS.
STATE COMPENSATION INS.
STATE COMPENSATION INS.
STATE COMPENSATION INS.
STATE COMPENSATION INS.
STATE COMPENSATION INS.
STATE COMPENSATION INS.
STATE COMPENSATION INS.
STATE COMPENSATION INS.
STATE COMPENSATION INS.
STATE COMPENSATION INS.
STONE, JEFFREY E.
SUPER TONER
SUPER TONER
SYSTEM 2/90
SYSTEM 2/90
SYSTEM 2/90
SYSTEM 2/90
SYSTEM 2/90
SYSTEM 2/90
SYSTEM 2/90
CITY OF TENEOULA
VOUCHER/.CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIOOS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
500 BUS]NESS CARDS; BLA
TAX
SLATER/RE FUND
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-100-999-5220
001-100-999-5220
190-183-4982
AQUATIC STAFF UNIFORMS 190-180;999-5243
FREIGHT 190-180-999-5243
TAX .. 190-180-999-5243
PEST CONTROL
4/04-5/02
4/05-5/04
4/05-5/04
4/05-5/04
4/07-5/06
4107-5/06
909-202-420~ WH APRIL
909-202-4758/RR
909-202-4762/RP
909-202-4763/PB
909-202-4769/JS
909-202-4770/DD
APRIL PREMIUM
APRIL PREMIUM
APRIL PREMIUM
APRIL PREMIUM
APRIL PREMIUM
APRIL PREMIUM
APRIL PREMIUM
APRIL PREMIUM
APRIL PREMIUM
APRIL PREMIUM
APRIL PREMIUM
APRIL PREMIUM
APRIL PREMIUM
4/13-4/15 LEAGUE
HP-II-III LASERJET CART
TAX
PRE-SPACED COPY; CAL SM
PRE-SPACED COPY; SANDEE
PRE-SPACED COPY; RORALD
PL50 1/2u PRE-SPACED CO
FREIGHT
FREIGHT
FREIGHT
190-181-999-5250
190-180-999-5240
191-180-999-5319
190-180-999-5240
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
001-110-999-5208
001-110-999-5208
001-100-999-5208
001-100-999-5208
001-100-999-5208
001-110-999-5208
001-2370
100-2370
190-2370
191-2170
192-2370
19~-2370
280-2370
300;2370
320-2370
33O-237O
340-2370
001-1182
001-1182
190-180-999-5258
320-199-999-5221
320-199-999-5221
190-180-999-5220
001-161-999-5220
001-110-999-5220
340-199-999-5219
190-180-999-5220
001-161-999-5220
001-110-999-5220
ITEM
AMOUNT
27.69
2.15
43.00
887.50
18.12
62.13
29.00
1,345.15
29.31
4,491.62
36.69
223.46
51.76
4~.39
114.01
86.58
47.13
66.00
37.17
4;147.93
2,857.87
2,028.28
289.33
12.46
24.08
92.24
'12.42
29.99
13.53
333.09
76.32
108.07
150.19
450.00
34.88
5.04
8.82
9.45
11.97
.75
.75
.75
CHECK
AMOUNT
29.8~
43.00
967.75
29.00
6,177.99
395.28
10,025.61
150.19
484;88
VOUCHRE2
05/19/94
11:47
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIOOS
PAGE_,,~
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
15129
15129
15129
15129
15129
15130
15130
15130
15130
15131
15131
15131
15131
15131
15131
15132
15133
15134
15134
15134
15134
15135
15135
15135
15135
15136
15136
15136
15136
15136
15136
15137
15137
15137
15138
15139
15139
15140
15141
15142
CHECK
DATE
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
05/19/94
VENDOR
NUMBER
00O303
000303
000303
000303
000303
00O305
000305
000305
000305
000825
000825
000825
000825
000825
000825
000320
000322
000325
000325
000325
000325
000326
000326
000326
000326
001065
001065
001065
001065
001065
001065
000389
000389
000389
001437
001342
001342
000339
VENDOR
NAME
SYSTEM 2/90
SYSTEM 2/90
SYSTEM 2/90
SYSTEM 2/90
SYSTEM 2/90
TARGET STORE
TARGET STORE
TARGET STORE
TARGET STORE
TEMECULA CYCLES
TEMECULA CYCLES
TEMECULA CYCLES
TEMECULA CYCLES
TEMECULA CYCLES
TEMECULA CYCLES
TOWNE CENTER STATIONERS
UNIGLOBE BUTTERFIELD TR
UNITED WAY OF THE INLAN
UNITED WAY OF THE INLAN
UNITED WAY OF THE INLAN
UNITED WAY OF THE INLAN
UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE
UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE
UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE
UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE
USCM/PEBSCO (DEF. CONP.
USCM/PEBSCO CDEF. CONP.
USCM/PEBSCO (DEF. CONP.
USCM/PEBSCO (DEF, CONP,
USCM/PEBSCO (DEF, CONP,
USCM/PEBSCO (DEF, CONP.
USCM/PEBSCO,. (OBRA)
USCM/PEBSCO, COBRA)
USCM/PEBSCO, COBRA)
VIRACK, MARYANN
WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY
WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY
WEST PUBLISHING C{3qPANY
WHITEHEAD, RHONDA
WlLKIE, LISA
iTEM
DESCRIPTION
FREIGHT
TAX
TAX
TAX
TAX
SONY RECORDER: MODEL 40
5 PK MICRO CASSETTE TAP
POLAROID FILM 600 DOLIBL
TAX
HEADLIGHT REPAIR
OIL & FILTER CHANGE
ADJUST BRAKES & CLUTCH
PARTS
HAZARDOUS WASTE DISPOSA
TAX
MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES
AIRFARE/SM
000325 tJU
000325
000325
000325
UNIFORM SERVICE
MISC. UNIFORM MAINT.
RENTAL & CLEANING
MAT & RENTAL CLEANING
001065 DEF COMP
001065 DEF CUMP
001065 DEF CONP
001065 OEF CONP
001065 DEF CONP
001065 DEF CONP
000389 PT RETIR
000389 PT RETIR
000389 PT RETIR
PAYMENT TO INSTRUd?OR
BLDG MAINTENANCE SUPPLX
BLDG MAINTENANCE SUPPLI
APRIL CHGS
80~ CONTRACT CLASS
WILKIE/REFUND
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
340-199-999-5219
190-180-999-5220
001-161-999-5220
001-110-999-5220
340-199-999-5219
001-163-999-5218
001-16~-999-5218
001-163-999-5218
001-16.3-999-5218
001-170-999-5214
001-170-999-5214
001-170-999-5214
001-170-999-5214
001-170~999-5214
001-170-999-5214
190-180-999-5220
001-100-999-5258
001-2120
100-2120
190-2120
280-2120
100-164-999-5243
190-180-999-5243
340-199-999-5250
190-180-999-5250
001-2080
100-2080
190-2080
300-2080
320-2080
340-2080
001-2160
100-2160
190-2160
190-183-999-5330
190-180-999-5212
190-180-999-5212
001-120-999-5228
190-183-999-5330
190-183-4982
ITEM
AMOUNT
.75
.39
.68
.73
.93
29.99
7.99
164.90
15.72
40.00
15.00
20.00
30,40
2.00
2.36
13.95
lzFG.O0
78.90
1.00
17.00
.60
23.00
18.85
30.75
90.99
2,265.03
197.98
156.32
3.46
312.50
SO.O0
188.48
96.00
503.96
128.00
101.49
26.02
46.85
152.00
20.00
CHECK
AMOUNT
41.01
218.60
109.76
13.95
144.00
97.50
163.59
2,985.29
788.44
128.00
127.51
46.85
152
20.DO
TOTAL CHECKS 159,88Z,.69
~/OUCHRE2
~5/26/9~
13:50
CITY OF TEHECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REG%STER
FOR ALL PER%00S
PAGE._5
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
100 GAS TAX FUND
190 CORNUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
210 CAPITAL IHPROVEHENT PROJ FUND
280 REDEVELOPHENT AGENCY -
300 INSURANCE FUND
310 VEHICLES FUND
320 %NFORRATION SYSTEHS
330 COPY CENTER FUND
340 FACILITIES
380 RDA - DEBT SERVICE
TOTAL
AROUNT
8,059.87
1,153.28
10,274.40
6,501.49
14,561.24
2,Z~86,06
907.50
189,879.76
SO0.O0
338.02
4,154.31
2,969.95
26.94
150,073.00
391,885.82
VOUCHRE2
05/26
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
15152
15152
-15152
15153
15154
15154
15154
15155
15156
15156
15157
15158
15159
151
15161
15161
15161
15162
15163
15164
15165
15165
15165
15166
15167
15167
15168
15168
15169
15170
15170
15~
13:50
CHECK VENDOR VENDOR
DATE NUMBER NAME
05/26/94
05/26/94
05/26/94
05/26/94
05/26/94
05/26/94
05/26/94
05/26/94
05/26/94
05/26/94
05/26/94
05/26/94
05/26/94
05/26/94
05/26/94
05/26/94
05/26/94
05/26/94
05/26/94
05/26/94
05/26/94
05/26/94
05/26/94
05/26/94
05/26/94
05/26/94
05/26/94
05/26/94
05/26/94
05/26/94
05/26/94
05/26/94
001391
001391
001391
ADOLPH KIEFER & ASSOC[A
ADOLPH KIEFER & ASSOCIA
ADOLPH KXEFER & ASSOCIA
000408 AGRICREDIT ACCEPTANCE C
000101 APPLE ONE
000101 APPLE ONE
000101 APPLE ONE
000474 ARBOR-PRO TREE SERVICE
000676 AUTOHOTIVE SPECIALTIES
000676 AUTOMOTIVE SPECIALTIES
000603 CABLE & WIRELESS COMMUN
000129 CAL WEST RENTAL CENTER
001021 CALIF GANG INVESTIGATOR
000647 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT 0
000126
000126
000126
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE HA
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE HA
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE HA
000950 CALIFORNIAN - DISPLAY
000127 CALIFORNIAN - LEGAL
00014~ COSTCO WHOLESALE
000155 DAVLIN
000155 DAVLIN
000155 DAVLIN
DELACROIX, PEIRRE
001125 DIGITAL TELECOMMUNICATI
001125 DIGITAL TELECOMMUNICATI
000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS
000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS
000166 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO
001002
001002
001002
FIRST INTERSTATE BANK -
FIRST INTERSTATE BANK -
FIRST INTERSTATE BANK -
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
AQUATIC SUPPLIES
FRE I GHT
TAX
TRACTOR LEASE/T~SD
SHALL BUS LOAN LIASON
RECEPTIONIST TEMP. HELP
WE 5/14
4142~ AVE DE LA REINA
EQUIP. STENCIL TRUCK
ADDITIONAL EQUIP.
APRIL 16-HAY 15
PARK HAINT RENTAL EQUIP
REGISTRATION/JUNE 7-10
CPA RENEWAL/MJ MCLARNEY
BAHIA VISTA PARK (EWA:
BAHIA VISTA PARK (EWA:
INSTALL TWO (2) SIX FO0
LEGAL NOTICE/B&S
PUBLIC NOTICES
CAMERA
VIDEO/AUDIO CITY COUNCZ
EXTRA TAPES, MISC. CHAR
VIDEO/AUDIO CITY COUNCI
TCSD REFUND/DELACROIX
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
OVERNIGHT LETTERS
OVERNIGHT LETTERS '
TITLE REPORTS/WlNCHESTE
5473666403910057 SN APR
5473666~03910057 SN APR
5473666403910099-ME
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
190-18~-999"5310
190-183-999-53i0
190-183-999-5310
190-180-999-5239
280-199-999-5250
001-120-999-5118
280-199-999-5250
100-16~-999-5402
100-16~-999-5610
100-164-999-5610
320-199-999-5208
190-180-999-5238
001-170-999-5261
001-140-999-5226
190-180-999-5212
190-180-999-5212
190-180-999-5212
001-162-999-5250
001-161-999-5256
001-170-999-5242
001-100-999-5250
001-100-999-5250
001-100-999-5250
190-183-4982
320-199-999-5250
320-199-999-5250
001-140-999-5230
190-180~999-5230
001-1280
190-180-999-5258
190-180-999-5260
001-100=999-5220
ITEM
AMOUNT
220,80
6,85
4,50
849,55
103,20
361,20
103.20
250.00
50.00
14.43
1,913.90
34.48
130.00
200.00
]60.00
300.00
76.00
38.72
180.82
140.06
700.00
1.67
700.00
30.00
270.00
135.00
9.50
9,50
400.00
606.69
17.35
42.02-
PAGE 1
CHECK
AMOUNT
23 Z, 15
8~9,55
567,60
250,00
64,43
1,913.90
130.00
200.00
736.00
38.72
180.82
140.06
1,401.67
30.00
405.00
19,00
400.00
582.02
IOUCNRE2
]5/26/94
JOUCHER/
:HECK
~IUMBER
15171
15172
15172
15172
15172
15172
15172
15172
15172
15172
15172
15172
15172
15172
15172
15172
15173
15173
15173
151T3
15174
15175
15176
15176
15176
15177
15178
15179
15179
15180
15180
15181
15182
15183
15184
15184
15185
13:50
CHECK
DATE
05/26/94
05/26/94
05/26/94
05/26/94
05/26/94
05/Z6/94
05/26/94
05/26/94
05/26/94
05/26/94
05/26/94
05/26/94
05/26/94
05/26/94
05/26/94
05/26/94
05/26/94
05/26/94
05/26/94
05/26/94
05/26/94
05/26/94
05/26/94
05/26/94
05/26/94
05/26/94
05/26/94
05/26/94
05/26/94
05/26/94
05/26/94
05/26/94
05/26/94
05/26/94
05/26/94
05/26/94
05/Z6/94
VENDOR
NUMBER
001~63
000177
000177
000177
000177
000177
000177
000177
000177
000177
000177
000177
000177
000177
000177
000177
00018/,
000184
00018/+
00018~
000423
000388
001407
001407
001407
000384
000414
000414
000214
000214
000219
000587
001464
O00Z~9
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIOOS
VENDOR
NAME
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
FOUNTAIN HOTEL
HOTEL RESERV.
GLENNIES OFFICE PR(X)UCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PROOUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
MISC. OFr::~ SUPPLIES;
MISC. OFF:CE SUPPLIES;
MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES;
MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES;
MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES;
MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES;
MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES; .
MlSc :~FICE SUPPLIES
MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES
RETURN OF PENS
GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPOR
GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPOR
GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPOR
GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPOR
909-181-1123 APRIL
909-694-1993 APRIL
909-699-8632
909-695-3564 ALARM
H & H CRAFT & FLORAL SU RECREATIONAL SUPPLIES
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-170-999-5261
001-162-99~-5Z20
001-162-999-5220
001-162-999-5220
001-162-~9-5220
001-110-999-5220
001-162-~-5220
001-162-999-5220
001-161-999-5220
001-110-999-5220
001-110-999-5220
001-110-999-5220
001-162-999-5220
001-110-9999-5220
001-161-999-5220
001-140-999-5220
320-199-999-5208
320-199-999-5208
320-199-999-5208
320-199-999-5208
190-182'999-5301
ICBO SUBSCRIPTION 001-162-999-5228
INTER VALLEY POOL SUPPL CRC POOL SUPPLIES
INTER VALLEY POOL SUPPL MlSC POOL SUPPLIES
INTER VALLEY POOL SUPPL MISC, POOL SUPPLIES
PUJOL ST IMPROVEMENTS
LAW/CRANDALL, INC.
BOND RELEASE/LEIGH, JAM
FILM & DEVELOPMT SUPPLI
AMOUNT NOT POSTED FROM
LEZGH, JAMES
LONGS DRUG STORE
LONGS DRUG STORE
LUNCH & STUFF CATERING COUNCIL MEETINGS
LUNCH & STUFf CATERING LUNCHES
MARTIN 1-HOUR PHOTO PHOT DEVELOPMENT
SENIOR CTR JANITOR~AL
MUNOZ, MARION.
MUTZIGER, LINDA AND QUI SETTLEMENT
PLAN CK REFUND/NEI4S CON
SMI REFUND/NEWS CONST
NEWS CONSTRUCTION
NEWS CONSTRUCTION
OLSTEN TEMPORARY SERVIC TEMPORARY ~E 5/8
190-180-999-5212
190-180-999-5212
190-180-999-5212
210-165-628-5804
001-2650
190-180-999-5250
190-180-999-5250
001-100-999-5260
001-100-999-5260
001-163-999-5250
190-181-999-5250
300-199-~-5207
001-162-4200
001-2290
001-162-999-5118
ITEM
AMOUNT
472.76
207.39
29.04
33.36
44.48
132.32
56.40
26.88
2~.90
39.39
209.36
2.53
146.74
12.88
21.50
7.27-
606.27
1,033.46
17.17
34.43
46.61
239.88
2.31.74
320.91
317.65
907.50
1,500.00
21.01
.01'
80.00
36.00
64.52
200,00
500.00
40.50
.50
364. O0
PAGE~
CHECK
472.76
978.90
1,6917~'
46.6,
2_39.88
870.30
907.50
1,500.00
21.00
116.00
64.52
ZO0.O0
500.00
41.00
-364
VOUCHRF,~
05/26
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUHBER
15186
15186
15186
45186
15186
15187
15188
15189
15189
15190
15191
15191
15192
15192
151"
15194'
15195
15196
15197
15197
15198
15198
15198
15198
15199
15199
15200
15200
15200
15200
15200
15200
15200
15200
15200
13:50
CHECK
DATE
05/26/94
05/26/94
05/26/94
05/26/94
05/26/94
05/26/94
05/26/94
05/26/94
05/26/94
05/26/94
05/26/94
05/26/94
05/26/94
05/26/94
05/26/94
05/26/94
05/26/94
05/26/94
05/26/94
05/26/94
05/26/94
05/26/94
05/26/94
05/26/94
05/26/94
05/26/94
05/26/94
05/26/94
05/26/94
05/26/94
05/26/94
05/26/94
05/26/94
05/26/94
05/26/94
VENDOR
NUMBER
000580
000580
000580
000580
000580
000829
001462
000546
000546
000992
000262
000262
000426
000426
000353
001461
000958
001374
000285
000285
000704
000704
000704
000704
000537
000537
000375
000375
000375
000375
000375
000375
000375
000375
000375
VENDOR
NAME
PHOTOk'ORKS
PHOTO WORKS
PHOTO WORKS
PHOTO I,X)RKS
PHOTO WORKS
PICNIC PEOPLE
PUBLIC SAFETY CENTER
RADIO SHACK/BUTTERFIELD
RADIO SHACK/BUTTERFIELD
RAMONA TIRE, INC,
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER
RANCHO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL
RANCHO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL
RIVERSIDE COUNTY AUDXTO
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TREASU
ROBERT CARAN PRODUCTION
SECRETARY OF STATE
SIR SPEEDY
SIR SPEEDY
SKS, INC./INLAND OIL
SKS, INC./INLAND OIL
SKS, INC./INLAND OIL
SKS, INC./INLAND OZL
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TEL
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TEL
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TEL
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TEL
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TEL
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TEL
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TEL
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TEL
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TEL
CiTY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
MISC, RECREATION PHOTOS
MISC. FILM AND PROCESSI
MISC, RECREATION PHOTOS
MISC, FILM AND PROCESSI
MISC, FILM AND PROCESSI
SECURITY DEPOSIT REFUND
TUITION JULY 17-24
14-600 AUTO-REV MUSIC 0
TAX
TIRE REPAIR
WATER CHARGES
t,{ATER CHARGES
MISC. SUPPLIES
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
93-94 ERAF PAYMENT
PARCEL 909-120-049-8 PA
FIREWORKS PRODUCTION
FILING FEE
2500 CONTINUOUS FORMS;
TAX
FUEL
FUEL
FUEL
FUEL
03/01-0~/30/94
03/01-04/30/94
909-202-4753
909-202-4754 KH APRIL
909-202-4755 VAN APRIL
909-202-4751 TS
909-202-4752 SN
909-202-4756 TH APRIL
909-202-4760JH
909-202-476/, BB
909-202-4765 BB
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
190-180-999-5301
001-171-999-5250
190-180-999-5301
001-171-999-5250
001-171-999-5250
190-183-4988
001-170-999-5261
320-199-999-5221
320-199-999-5Z21
310-162-999-5214
193-180-999-5240
190-180-999-5240
190-180-999-5212
340-199-999-5212
380-199-999-5245
280-199-999-5275
190-183-999-5370
280-1520
001-140-999-5222
001-140-999-5222
100;16~-999-5263
001-162'999-5263
190-180-999'5263
001-110-999-5263
192-180-999-5319
191'180-999-5319
190-180-999-5208
190-180-999'5208
190-180-999'5208
100-164-999-5208
190-180-999-5208
320'199-999'5208
100'16~'999-5208
100-16/,'999'5208
100'16/,'999'5208
ITEM
AMOUNT
22.08
9.35
63.15
7.67
8.02
100.00
224.00
99.99
7.75
74.83
2,486.06
1,031.6~
103.99
26.94
150,07'5.00
189,623.36
4,500.00
50.00
635.00
49.22
486.74
60.58
51.68
38.82
14,561.24
6,501.49
40.28
53.91
68.43
6~.36
92.36
36,34
140.62
59.39
51.74
PAGE 3
CHECK
AMOUNT
110.27
100.00
224.00
107.74
74.83
3,517.70
130.93
150,075.00
189,623.36
4,500.00
50.00
684.22
637.82
21,062.75
607.43
15 05/26/94 000291 SPEE DEE OIL CHANGE & T OIL CHANGE 310-164-999-5214 35.56
VOUCHRE2
05/26/94
13:50
CITY OF TEHECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
15201
15201
15202
15202
15203
15204
15205
15206
15206
15206
15207
15208
CHECK
DATE
05/26/96
05/26/94
05/26/94
05/26/94
05/26/9~
05/26/9~
05/26/94
05/26/94
05/26/9~
05/26/94
05/26/94
05/26/94
VENDOR VENDOR
NUMBER NAME
000291 SPEE DEE OIL CHANGE & T
000291 SPEE DEE OiL CHANGE & T
000905 TEMECULA SHUTTLE SERVIC
000905 TEMECULA SHUTTLE SERVIC
000307 TEMECULA TROPHY CO.
TIPPS, JONI
000322 UNIGLOBE BUTTERFIELD TR
000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE
000326 UN1TOG RENTAL SERVICE
000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE
001076 WESTERN ~ASTE, INC.
000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI
[TEN
DESCRIPTION
OIL CHANGE/COOLING SYST
OIL CHANGE/REPLACE BELT
SHUTTLE/~,/E
SHUTTLE
SENiOR/TEEN POOL TOURNA
MILEAGE/TIPPS~ JONI
AIRFARE/MJ MCLARNEY
UNIFORM RENTAL
UNIFORM SERVICE
MISC. UNIFORM MAINT.
PORTABLE TOILET RENTALS
LEASE JUNE
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
310-180-999-521~
310-180-999-521~
001-100-999-5258
001-100-999-5258
190-182-999-5301
001-140-999-5262
001-140-999-5258
100-16~-999-5243
100-16~-~-5243
190-180-~9-5243
190-180-999-52~8
330-199-999-5Z39
ITEM
AMOUNT
85.91
141.72
75.00
75.00
19.40
139.20
141.00
13.00
2~,00
18.85
455.00
2,969.95
CHECK
AMOUNT
263.19
150.00
19.40
139.Z0
141.00
54.85
455.00
2,969.95
TOTAL CHECKS
391,885
VOUCMgJ52 PAGE 9
06~ 15: 08
CiTY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIOOS
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
100 GAS TAX FUND
190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY -
300 INSURANCE FUND
310 VEHICLES FUND
320 INFORMAT[ON SYSTEMS
330 COPY CENTER FUND
340 FACILITIES
TOTAL
AMOUNT
55,648.06
13,005.05
17,546.46
~,384.69
200.87
2,037.40
29,4Z3.57
450.24
141.98
2,674.93
633.88
36,370.40
163,517.53
VOUCHRE2 PAr, rk 1
06/02/94 15: 08
CITY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOIl ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
15234
307~91
30~1
307991
307991
307991
307991
307991
307991
307991
307991
307991
307991
307991
307991
307991
307991
307991
307991
307991
307991
307991
307991
348906
348906
348906
348906
348906
348906
348906
348906
348906
348906
348906
348906
348906
348906
348906
348906
348906
348906
348906
348906
348906
348906
15240
15240
15240
CHECK
DATE
05/31/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
VENDOR
NUMBER
000700
000444
000444
00{:~4.44
000444
00044.,4
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
00028~
000283
000283
00028~
000283
000283
001476
001476
001476
VENOOR
NAME
TEMECULA ARTS COUNCIL
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX CEDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FiRSTAX (IRS)
FiRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (XRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX ({RS)
FIRSTAX CIqS)
FIRSTAX (iRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX CIRS)
FiRSTAX ([RS)
FIRSTAX (XRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (]RS)
A & K COMMUNICATIONS
A & K COMMUNICATIONS
A & K CONNUNICATXONS
[TEN
DESCRIPTION
TICKETS NAYOR BALL
000444 SD l
000444 S{) I
{){)0444 SD I
000444 SDI
000444 SDI
000444 SDI
000444 SDI
000444 SDI
000444 SDI
000444 SD]
000444 SDI
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000~ STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
0004/~ STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL.
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDICA~E
000283 NED]CARE
000283 NED]CARE
000283 MEDICARE
RDA LOAN
RDA LOAN
RDA LOAN
ACCOIJNT
NUMBER
001-100-999-5260
001-2070
100-2070
1~0-2070
191-2070
192-2070
193-2070
280-2070
300-2070
320-2070
330-2070
340-2070
001-2070
100-2070
190-2070
191-2070
192-2070
193-2070
280-2070
300-2070
320-2070
330-2070
340-2070
001-2070
100-2070
190-2070
191-2070
192-2070
193-2070
280-2070
300-2070
320-2070
330-2070
340-2070
001-2070
100-2070
190-2070
191-2070
192-2070
193-2070
280-2070
300-2070
320-2070
330-2070
340-2070
280-i¢~-~-5250
280-1¢~-4068
280-1520
ITEM
AMOUNT
125,00
1,017.84
263.55
330.27
7.66
11.90
27.47
14.55
9.37
25.45
10.25
2,595.05
534.79
17.64
1.26
44.57
31.08
60.86
15.71
6.68
9,8/~,.08
2,983.19
2,763.76
51.09
44.11
206.59
138.80
80.45
264.55
89.27
77.53
2,535.19
639.34
757.78
17.07
26,54
61.29
32.45
20.92
56.78
22.86
52.48
5.00-
250.00-
29,000.00
CHECK
AMOUNT
125.00
5,799.89
20,766.12
28,24
VOUC. ME,.E2
06. ~.
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
15241
15242
15243
15244
15245
15245
15245
15245
15245
15245
15246
15246
15246
15246
15246
15246
15c~6
15246
15247
15248
15249
15250
15251
15251
15251
15252
15253
15253
15253
15254
15254
15254
15254
15254
15~4
15:08
CHECK
DATE
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
VENDOR
NLINBER
000715
001391
000558
001425
001222
001222
001222
001222
001222
001222
000116
000116
000116
000116
000116
000116
000116
000116
000116
000116
001470
000129
OOO473
001289
001289
001289
000950
000127
000127
000127
000642
000642
000642
000642
000642
000642
VENDOR
NNqE
A.W. DIRECT, INC.
ADOLPH KIEFER & ASSOC]A
ADVANCED MORILECOMM
AIRTOUCH CELLULAR - S.D
ALPHA COMMUNICATIONS
ALPHA COMMUNICATIONS
ALPHA COMMUNICATIONS
ALPHA COMMUNICATIONS
ALPHA COMMUNICATIONS
ALPHA COMMUNICATIONS
AVP VISION PLANS
AVP VISION PLANS
AVP VISION PLANS
AVP VISION PLANS
AVP VISION PLANS
AVP VISION PLANS
AVP VISION PLANS
AVP VISION PLANS
AVP VISION PLANS
AVP VISION PLANS
BETT'S ELECTRIC
BRAMALEA
CAL WEST RENTAL CENTER
CALIFORNIA REDEVELOPMEN
CALIFORNIA STATE CAPITO
CALIFORNIA STATE CAPITO
CALIFORNIA STATE CAPITO
CALIFORNIAN - DISPLAY
CALIFORNIA~ - LEGAL
CALIFORNIAN - LEGAL
CALIFORNIAN - LEGAL
CITY OF TEMECULA -FLEX
CITY OF TEMECULA - FLEX
CITY OF TEMECULA - FLEX
CITY OF TEMECULA - FLEX
CITY OF TEMECULA - FLEX
CITY OF TEMECULA - FLEX
CITY OF TENEOUUk
VOUCHER/CHECK ~GISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCR]PTION
SAFETY BEACON
FIBERGLASS RESCUE POLE
PALOK~R/ELSINORE SERVIC
SD-1075255 CELLUAR PHON
CELLULAR SERVICE
CELLULAR SERVICE
CELLULAR SERVICE
CELLULAR SERVICE
CELLULAR SERVICE
CELLULAR SERVICE
000116 AVP
000116 AVP
000116 AVP
000116 AVP
000116 AVP
000116 AVP
000116 AVP
000116 AVP
000116 AVP
000116 VIS COBR
REIMB, SNACKBAR
DEV REFUND/BRAMALEA
TRENCHER
INCOME HOUSING SEMI
STATE BUDGET
POSTAGE
TAX
COMMUNITY SERVICES COMM
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARIN
TCSD PUBLIC HEARING AD
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARIN
REIMB, ACCOUNT
REIMB, ACCOUNT
REIMB. ACCOUNT
REIMB, ACCOUNT
REIMB, ACCOUNT
REIMB. ACCOUNT
ACC{33NT
NUMBER
190-180-999-SZ4Z
190-183-999-5310
320-199-999-5208
001-140-999-5208
190-180-999-5228
001-162-999-5228
320-199-999-5228
100-164-999-5228
001-170-999-5242
001-140-999-5250
001-2210
100-2210
190-2210
191-2210
193-2210
280-2210
300-2310
330-2310
340-2310
001-1180
190-180-999-5212
001-2660
190-180-999-5238
001-161-999-5258
001-110-999-5228
001-110-999-5228
001-110-999-5228
001-120-999-5254
001-161-999-5256
190-180-999-5256
001-161-999-5256
001-1020
190-1020
100-1020
280-1020
300-1020
330-1020
ITEM
AMOUNT
63,95
13.23
738.00
168.98
121.00
33,00
11.00
62.3~
18.33
7.33
385.04
131.92
106.35
4.14
5.06
9.45
3.94
15.75
15.75
24.95
416.73
1,650.00
99.38
190.00
100.00
3.41
7.75
105.92
37.17
33.30
39.72
3,243.12
726.66
40.59
2.00
21.25
16.25
PAGE 2
CHECK
AMOUNT
63,95
13.22
738.00
168.98
253, O0
702.35
416.73
1,650.00
99.38
190.00
111.16
105.92
110.19
4,049.87
VOUCHRE2
06/02/94
VOUCHER/
NUMBER
15255
15255
15255
15255
15256
15256
15256
15256
15256
15256
15256
15256
15256
15257
15257
15257
15257
15258
15259
15260
15260
15260
15261
15261
15261
15262
15263
15263
15264
15265
15265
15265
15265
15266
15266
15266
15267
15267
15267
15:08
CHECK
DATE
06/0Z/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
VENDOR
NUMBER
001477
001477
001477
001477
000140
000140
000140
000140
000140
000140
000140
000140
000140
001193
001193
001193
001193
001434
001185
000155
000155
000155
000156
000156
000156
OOO754
001056
001056
000478
000177
000177
000177
000177
000192
000192
000192
000180
000180
000180
VENDOR
NAME
CLOUD NINE LIMOUSINE SE
CLOUD NINE LIMOUSINE SE
CLOUD NINE LIMOUSINE SE
CLOUD NINE LIMOUSINE SE
CITY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PER%ODS
ZTEM
DESCRIPT]OR
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
AIRPORT SHUTTLE
AIRPORT SHUTTLE
AIRPORT SHUTTLE
AIRPORT SHUTTLE
001-140-~-5258
001-161-~-5258
001-162-~-5258
320-1~-~-5258
COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 1500 A&S 190-2330
COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 CANCER 001-Z330
COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 CANCER 100-2330
COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 CANCER 190-2330
COLONIAL LIFE & ACC]DEN · 000140 CANCER 191-2330
COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 CANCER 193-2330
COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 CANCER 280-2330
COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 CANCER 330-2330
COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 000140 CANCER 340-2330
CONP USA, INC.
CUMP USAt INC.
CONP USA, INC.
CONP USA, INC.
COUCH, COLETTE
CPRS DISTRICT XI/RANCHO
DAVLIN
DAVLIN
DAVLIN
541220 3CUM 32BIT NET~O 320-1~-~9-5221
FREIGHT 320-1~-~-5221
TAX 320-199-~-5221
SOFTWARE AND SUPPLIES 320-199-999-5221
PAYMENT TO'INSTRUCTOR 190-183-9~-5330
ENTRY FEE 190-180-999-5258
AUDIO TAPE; PLANNING
HAY 24 COUNCIL MEETING
EXTRA TAPES
001-161-999-5250
001-100-999-5250
001-100-999-5250
DENTICARE OF CALIFORNIA 000156 ADMINFEE 001-2340
DENTICARE OF CALIFORNIA 000156 DENTICAR 001-2340
DENTICARE OF CALIFORNIA 000156 DENTICAR 100-2340
ELLIOTT GROUPi THE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
FAST SIGNS
GLENNIES OFFICE PROOUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE
GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE
GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CONPAN
GRAYBAR EEECTRIC CONPAN
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CONPAN
MISC. LANDSCAPE REVIEW 001-161-999-5248
LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENT
IRRIGATION REPAIR
193-180-999-5415
193-180-999-5415
TOT-LOT SIGNS
190-180-999-5250
MISC, OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES
',
CT240 HEADSET EXT CORD
FREIGHT
TAX
190-180-~-5220
001-150-~-5220
001-161-999-5220
001-140-9~-5220
320-199-~9-5221
320-1gg-~-5221
320-1~-~9-5221
BOGAN MMT34 DIGITAL REC
FREIGHT
TAX
320-1~-~-5215
320-1.~-~-5215
320-1~-~9-5215
ITEM
AMOUNT
36.00
36.00
36.00
36.00
22,00
126.85
9.75
64.50
11.48
14.02
3.90
19.50
25.50
462.00
25.00
38.12
4.27
252.00
70.00
150.00
700.00
1.67
15.00
29.86
14.93
225.00
187.00
185.00
109.13
37.17
12.39
53.85
28. O0
19.95
5.94
1.83
275. O0
3.45
21.31
PAC-L 3
CHECK
AMOUNT
1~4.00
297.50
529.39
252.00
851.67
59.79
225.00
372.00
109.13
131.41
27.72
VOUCJL[E2 CITY OF TENECULA
06 '~ 15:08 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT
NtJt4BER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
15267 06/02/94 000180 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CONPAN BOGAN !qqT34 DIG]TAL REC
15267 06/02/94 000180 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CONPAN FREIGHT
15267 06/02/94 000180 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CONPAN TAX
190-182-999-5212
190-182-999-5212
190-182-999-5212
275,00
3,45
21.31
599.52
15268 06/02/94 000765 GROUP AMERICA 000765 LIFE INS
15268 06/02/94 000765 GROUP AMERICA 000765 LIFE INS
15268 06/02/94 000765 GROUP AMERICA 000765 LIFE INS
15268 06/02/94 000765 GROUP AMERICA 000765 LIFE
15268 06/02/94 000765 GROUP AMERICA 000765 LIFE INS
15268 06/02/94 000765 GROUP AMERICA 000765 LIFE INS
15268 06/02/94 000765 GROUP AMERICA 000765 LIFE INS
15268 06/02/94 000765 GROUP AMERICA 000765 LIFE INS
15268 06/02/94 000765 GROUP AMERICA 000765 LIFE INS
15268 06/02/94 000765 GROUP AMERICA 000765 LIFE INS
15268 06/02/94 000765 GROUP AMERICA 000765 LIFE INS
15268 06/02/94 000765 GROUP AMERICA 000765 LTD
15268 06/02/94 000765 GROUP AMERICA 000765 LTD
15268 06/02/94 000765 GROUP AMERICA 000765 LTD
15268 06/02/94 000765 GROUP AMERICA 000765 LTD
15268 06/02/94 000765 GROUP AMERICA 000765 LTD
15268 06/02/94 000765 GROUP AMERICA 000765 LTD
$r'--q 06/02/94 000765 GROUP AMERICA 000765 LTD
06/02/94 000765 GROUP AMERICA 000765 LTO
15~8 06/02/94 000765 GROUP AMERICA 000765 LTO
15268 06/02/94 000765 GROUP AMERICA 000765 LTO
15268 06/02/94 000765 GROUP AMERICA 000765 LTO
15268 06/02/94 000765 GROUP AMERICA · 000765 STO
15268 06/02/94 000765 GROUP AMERICA 000765 STD
15268 06/02/94 000765 GROUP AMERICA 000765 STD
15268 06/02/94 000765 GROUP AMERICA 000765 STD
15268 06/02/94 000765 GROUP AMERICA 000765 STD
15268 06/02/94 000765 GROUP AMERICA 000765 STD
15268 06/02/94 000765 GROUP AMERICA 000765' STD
15268 06/02/94 000765 GROUP AMERICA 000765 STO
15268 06/02/94 000765 GROUP AMERICA 000765 -STO
15268 06/02/94 000765 GROUP AMERICA 000765 STO
15268 06/02/94 000765 GROUP AMERICA 000765 STD
001-2360
'100-2360
190-2360
191-2360
192-2360
193-2360
280-2360
300-2360
320-2360
-330-2360
340-2360
001-2380
100-2380
190-2380
191-2380
192-2380
193-2380
280-2380
300-2380
320-2380
330-2380
340-2380
001-2500
100-2500
190-2500
191-2500
192-2500
193-2500
280-2500
300-2500
320-2500
330-2500
340-2500
545.31
128.25
142.50
4.28
9.50
14.72
5.70
4.74
9.50
9.50
19.00
789.19
227. O0
193.92
5.89
8.25
20.91
13.29
7.76
18.67
8.72
18.42
186.35
49.47
42
1
1.81
4.60
2.92
1.71
4.11
1.92
4.05
2,505.92
15269 06/02/94 000430 GROUP AMERICA - VOLUNTA 000430 VOLE DE
15269 06/02/94 000430 GROUP AMERICA - VOLUNTA 000430 VOL LIFE
15269 06/02/94 000430 GROUP AMERICA - VOLUNTA 000430 VOL LIFE
15269 06/02/94 000430 GROUP AMERICA - VOLUNTA 000430 VOL LIFE
15269 06/02/94 000430 GROUP AMERICA - VOLUNTA 000430 VOL B OE
15269 06/02/94 000430 GROUP AMERICA - VOLUNTA 000430 VOL LI~E
15269 06/02/94 000430 GROUP AMERICA - VOLUNTA 000430 VOL LIFE
15269 06/02/94 000430 GROUP AMERICA - VOLUNTA 000430 VOL LIFE
001-2510
001-2510
100-2510
190-2510
001-2510
001-2510
100-2510
190-2510
161.80
105.90
11.40
44.50
161.80-
105.90
11.40
44.50
323.60
15270 06/02/94 000184 GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPOR CRC FIRE ALARM LINE
15270 06/02/94 000184 GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPOR 909-699-2475
320-199-999-5208
100;164-999-5208
34.18
34.48
68.66
06/02/94 000194 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST 4 000194 DEF CONP 001-2080 1,808.96
VOUCHRE2
06/02/94
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
15271
15271
15271
15271
15271
15271
15272
15273
15274
15275
15276
15277
15277
15277
15278
15279
15279
15279
15279
15280
15281
15281'.
15281
15281
15281
15281
15281
15281
15281
15281
15281
15282
15283
15284
1528~
15284
15284
15284
15:08
CHECK
DATE
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
VENDOR
NUMBER
000194
000194
000194
000194
000194
000194
001033
001186
001471
000886
000206
000206
000206
001467
000228
000228
000228
000228
001469
000431
000431
000431
000431
000431
000431
000431
000431
000431
000431
000431
000239
001243
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
VENDOR
NAME
IL'MA RETIREMENT TRUST 4
ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST 4
ICNA RETIREMENT TRUST 4
ICNA RETIREMENT TRUST 4
ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST'4
ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST 4
INN AT THE PARK HOTEL,
IRWIN, JOHN
JAEGER, ROGER
JIMENEZ, DIANA
KHALSA, ATMA KAUR
KINKO'S OF RIVERSIDE,
KINKO'S OF RIVERSIDE,
KINKO'S OF RIVERSIDE,
LASKIN, JON
MOBIL
MOBIL
MOBIL
MOBIL
MUSI-CAL
NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH,
NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH,
NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH,
NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH,
NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH,
NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH,
NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH,
NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH,
NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH,
NATIONAL D~NTAL HEALTH,
NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH,
OLSTEN TEMPORARY SERVIC
PALMQUIST, MARY
PERS (HEALTH INSUR.PREM
PERS (HEALTH INSUR.PREM
PERS (HEALTH INSUR.PREM
PERS (HEALTH INSUR.PREM
PERS (HEALTH INSUR.PREM
CiTY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
iTEM
DESCRIPTION
000194 DEF CUMP
000194 DEF CONP
000194 DEF CONP
000194 DEF CUMP
000194 DEF CONP
000194 DEF CONP
NOTEL/CORF. POLICE
80% CONTRACT CLASS
REINB/SNACKBAR
JIMENEZ/REFUND
80% CONTRACT CLASS
PR]NT 30 DAY POOL PASS
PRINTING OF 4TH OF JULY
TAX
DEPOSIT JAZZ CONCERT
8839303792 MAY
8839303792 MAY
8839303792 MAY
8839303792 MAY
TRAINING
000431 ADMINFEE
000431 DENT COB
000431 DENTAL
000431 DENTAL
000431 DENTAL
000/,31 DENTAL
000/,31 DENTAL
000431 DENTAL
000431 DENTAL
000431 DENTAL
000431 DENTAL
GRAGE, VICKY ME 05/15
t
CONTRACT CLASS
000245 ADMINFEE
000245 AETNA SO
000245 AETNA SO
000245 BLSH[ELD
000245 BLSHIELD
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
100-2080
190-2080
191-2080
193-2080
280-2080
300-2080
001-170-999-5261
190-183-999-5330
190-180-999-5212
190-183-4975
190-18~-999-5330
190-180-999-5222
190-180-999-5222
190-180-999-5222
190-18~-999-5370
001-110-999-5263
001-150-999-5262
001-161-999-5262
100-164-999-5263
190-180-999-5258
001-2340
001-1180
001-2340
100-2340
190-2340
191-?.340
193-2340
280-2340
300-2340
330-P~40
340-2340
001-162-999-5118
190-183-999-5330
001-2090
001-2090
190-2090
001-2090
100-2090
ITEM
AMOUNT
398.21
475.52
34.08
41.66
5.00
25.36
501.72
179.20
243.54
50.00
44.80
60.00
58.50
9.18
50.00
19.00
12.96
12.68
23.00
260.00
15.00
32.50
538.71
178.73
130.00
7.31
8.94
9.75
4.06
16.25
16.25
364.00
246.40
110.64
892.00
311.91
323.00
415.00
p~.cr,. 5
CHECK
AMOUNT
2,788.79
501.72
179.20
243.54
50.00
~.80
127.68
67.64
260. O0
957.50
364. O0
246.40
vourjmEz
Od 4
15:08
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERlaDS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
CHECK VENDOR VENDOR
DATE NUMBER NAME
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AHOUHT
15284
15284
15284
15284
15284
15284
15284
15284
15284
15284
15284
15284
15284
15284
15284
15284
15284
15284
15284
15284
15284
~.--~
15~64
15284
15284
15284
15284
15284
15284
15284
15284
15284
15284
15284
15284
15284
15284
15284
15285
15285
15285
15285
15285
15285
15285
15285
15285
1~5
06/02/94 000245
06/02/94 000245
06/02/94 000245
06/02/94 000245
06/02/94 000245
06/02/94 000245
06/02/94 000245
06/02/94 000245
06/02/94 000245
06/02/94 000245
06/02/94 000245
06/02/94 000245
06/02/94 000245
06/02/94 000245
06/02/94 000245
06/02/94 000245
06/02/94 000245
06/02/94 000245
06/02/94 000245
06/02/94 000245
06/02/94 000245
06/02/94 000245
06/02/94 000245
06/02/94 000245
06/02/94 000245
06/02/94 000245
06/02/94 000245
06/02/94 000245
06/02/94 000245
06/02/94 000245
06/02/94 000245
06/02/94 000245
06/02/94 000245
06/02/94 000245
06/02/94 000245
06/02/94 000245
06/02/94 000245
06/02/94 000245
06/02/94 000245
06/02/94 000246
06/02/94 000246
06/02/94 000246
06/02/94 000246
06/02/94 000246
06/02/94 000246
06/02/94 000246
06/02/94 000246
06/02/94 000246
06/02/94 000246
06/02/94 000246
PERS (HEALTH INSUR.PREM 000245
PERS (HEALTH INSUR.PREN -000245
PERS (HEALTH INSUR.PREM 000245
PERS (HEALTH INSUR.PREM 000245
PERS (HEALTH ]NSUR.PREM 000245
PERS (HEALTH INSUR.PREM 000245
PERS (HEALTH INSUR.PREM 000245
PERS (HEALTH INSUR.PREM 000245
PERS (HEALTH INSUR.PREM 000245
PERS (HEALTH IHSUR.PREN 000245
PERS (HEALTH INSUR.PREN 000245
PERS (HEALTH INSUR,PREN 000245
PERS (HEALTH ]NSUR.PREN 000245
PERS (HEALTH INSUR.PREM 000245
PERS (HEALTH INSUR.PREN 000245
PERS (HEALTH INSUR.PREM 000245
PERS (HEALTH INSUR.PREM 000245
PERS (HEALTH INSUR.PREN 000245
PERS (HEALTH INSUR.PREN 000245
PERS (HEALTH INSUR.PREM 000245
PERS (HEALTH ZNSUR.PREM 000245
PERS (HEALTH INSUR.PREN 000245
PERS (HEALTH INSUR.PREN 000245
PERS (HEALTH INSUR.PREN 000245
PERS (HEALTH INSUR.PREM 000245
PERS (HEALTH INSUR.PREN 000245
PERS (HEALTH ]NSUR.PREM 000245
PERS (HEALTH iNSUR.PREM 000245
PERS (HEALTH ZNSUR.PREN 000245
PERS (HEALTH INSUR.PREN 000245
PERS (HEALTH ZNSUR.PREM 000245
PERS (HEALTH INSUR.PREM 000245
PERS (HEALTH ZNSUR.PREM 000245
PERS (HEALTH ZNSUR.PREN 000245
PERS (HEALTH [NSUR.PREN 000245
PERS (HEALTH INSUR.PREM 000245
PERS (HEALTH INSUR.PREM 000245
PERS (HEALTH INSUR.PREN 000245
PERS (HEALTH INSUR.PREN 000245
PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246
PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246
PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246
PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246
PERS EMPLOYEES' RET]REM 000246
PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246
PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246
PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246
PERS EMPLOYEES' RETZREM 000246
PERS EMPLOYEES' RETZREM 000246
PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246
CALICARE
CIGNA
CIGNA
CIGNA
CIGNA
EMP DED
HELTHNET
HELTHNET
HELTHNET
HELTHNET
HELTHNET
HELTHNET
HELTHNET
KAISERSO
KAISERSO
PACIFICR
PAC]FICR
PACIFICR
PACIF1CR
PC
PERS CHO
PERS CHO
TAKECARE
TAKECARE
TAKECARE
TAKECARE
;'BKOT DED
CIGNA
CIGNA
HELTHNET
HELTHNET
HELTHN~T
HELTHNET
PACIFICR
PACiFZCR
PC
PERS CHO
TAKECARE
TAKECARE
PER REDE
PER REDE
PERS RET
PERS R~T
PERS RET
PERS RET
PERS RET
PERS RET
PERS RET
PERS RET
PERS RET
1 O0 - 2090
001-2090
1 O0 - 2090
280-2090
300-2090
001-2090
001-20~0
1 O0 - 20~0
1~0-2090
191-2090
193-2090
330-2090
340-2090
001-2090
190 - 2090
001-2090
100-2090
190 - 2090
193-2090
001-2090
001-2090
100- 2090
001-2090
1 O0 - 2090
280-2090
300-2090
001-2090
001-2090
280- 2090
001-2090
100- 2090
190-2090
340-2090
001-2090
100- 2090
O01 - 2090
001-2090
001-2090
280-2090
001-2130
100-2130
001-2390
100-2390
190-2390
191-2390
192-2390
193-2390
280-2390
300-2390
320-2390
401,53
1,911.41
325.08
79.78
101.95
576.19
3,089.91
1,157.82
1,806.92
135.95
166.16
302.11
416.95
978.36
815.30
578.08
584.25
895.23
303.58
1,046.71
1,590.87
373. O0
1,740.20
595.87
170.18
41.88
478.10-
7.26
1.81
105.57
1.86
210.34
5.98
13.57
7.40
94.29
27.13
1.74
1.15
107.35
107.35
10,:380.61
2,752.34
2,486.58
80.06
96.57
284.39
155.59
95.92
245.53
22,237.82
VOUCHRE2
06/02/94
15:08
C%TY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PER%0OS
pact-,, 7
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
15285
15285
15285
15285
15285
15285
15285
15285
15285
15285
15285
15285
15285
15286
15286
15286
15286
15286
15286
15286
15286
15286
15286
15286
15286
15287
15288
15289
15290
15291
15292
15293
15294
15294
15294
15294
15295
15296
15296
15296
CHECK
DATE
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
VENDOR
NUMBER
0002~6
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
001472
000546
000262
001241
001475
000815
000374
000374
000374
000374
001212
000375
000375
000375
VENDOR
NAME
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246
PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246
PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREN 000246
PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREN 000246
PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246
PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246
PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246
PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246
PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246
PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246
PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREN 000246
PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREN 000246
PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246
PERS RET
PERS RET
SURVIVOR
SURVIVOR
SURVIVOR
SURVIVOR
SURVIVOR
SURVIVOR
SURVIVOR
SURVIVOR
SURVIVOR
SURVIVOR
SURVIVOR
PETTY CASH PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH PETTY CASH
POSTER COMPLIANCE CENTE FEDERAL POST]NGS
RADIO SHACK/BUTTERFIELD RECORDER
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER 3/30-5/04
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
530-B90
001-2~90
100-2390
190-2390
191-2390
192-2390
193-2390
280-2~90
300-2390
320-2390
330-2390
340-2390
001-110-999-5220
001-162-999-5260
001-16.3-999-5260
001-170-999-5220
190-180-999-5242
190-180-999-5301
001-110-999-5220
001-150-999-5260
001-162-999-5261
190-180-999-5258
100-164-999-5238
001-162-999-5222
001-163-999-5228
001-163-999-5242
190-180-999-5240
REED, JIM REIMB. WORK BOOTS 190-180-999-5243
REVENUE AT RISK SEMINAR SEMINAR JUNE 15
ROBERTSON, SUSAN
ROBERTSON/REFUND
ROWLEY, CATHERINE
80X CONTRACT CLASS
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
04/21-05/20/94
4/25-5/25
4/25-5/25
4/25-5/25
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS 4/25-5/24
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TEL
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TEL
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TEL
909-202-4757 JG APRIL
909-202-4767 GT APRIL
909-202-5153 GY APRIL
001-140-999-5258
190-183-4975
190-183-999-5330
100-164-999-5240
191-180-999-5319
340-199-999-5240
193-180-999-5240
190-181-999-5240
001-iZ0-999-5208
001-161-999-5208
001-110-999-5208
ITEM
AMOUNT
104.86
222.10
55.80
12.54
13.95
.42
.93
1.44
.57
.47
.93
,93
1.86
19.26
19.81
4~.95
11.69
12.59
88.04
2.78
42.21
15.00
5.00
18.4~
42.80
29.03
114.70
63.45
95. O0
15.00
25.00
64.00
26.61
5,006.32
5,521.86
460.00
38.33
63.49
60.35
66.30
CHECK
AMOUNT
17,189.09
322.57
29.03
114.70
63.45
95.00
15.00
25.00
64.00
11,014.79
38.33
VOUCIJRE2 PAGE 8
06/ 15: 08
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
15296
15296
15297
15298
15299
15300
15301
15302
15303
15304
15305
15305
1,
15306
15306
15306
15306
15307
15307
15307'
15307
15307
15307
15308
15308
15308
15309
15310
15311
15312
15312
CHECK
DATE
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
06/02/94
VENDOR VENDOR
NUMBER NAME
000375 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TEL
000375 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TEL
001448 SOUTHLAND FIRE PROTECT]
000291 SPEE DEE OIL CHANGE & T
001372 STAR WAY PRODUCTIONS
000752 STONE~ JEFFREY E.
000168 TEMECULA FLOWER CORRAL
000320 TOUNE CENTER STATIONERS
001376 TOYOTA OF TEMECULA VALL
000459 TUMBLE JUNGLE
000325 UNITED WAY OF THE INLAN
000325 UNITED WAY OF THE INLAN
000325 UNITED WAY OF THE INLAN
000325 UNITED WAY OF THE INLAN
000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE
000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE
000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE
000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE
001065 USCN/PEBSCO (DEF. CONP.
001065 USCN/PEBSCO (DEF. CONP.
001065 USCN/PEBSCO (DEF. CONP.
001065 USCN/PEBSCO .(DEF. CONP.
001065 USCM/PEBSCO (DEF. CONP.
001065 USCM/PEBSCO (DEF. COMP.
000389 USCM/PEBSCO, (OBRA)
000389 USCN/PEBSCO, (ORRA)
000389 USCM/PEBSCO, (ORRA)
001209 VAULT~ THE
001437 VIRACK~ MARYANN
001433 VYLANI: AKA; VY ALLMON
000342 MINDSOR PARTNERS - RANC
000342 WINDSOR PARTNERS - RANC
CiTY OF TENEOULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
909-202-4759 TE APRIL
909-202-4761SM APRIL
Reptacemen~ of sprinkle
OIL CHANGE
MEMORIAL SERVICE
REIMB. TICKETS
BECKY KARCHER FLOk'ERS
OFFICE SUPPLIES
TOMING VEHICLE
80X CONTRACT CLASS
000325 UW
000325 UW
000325 UW
000325 UW
UNIFORM RENTAL
MISC. UNIFORM PAINT.
RUG RENTAL
FLOOR MAT RENTAL & CLEA
001065 DEF CONP
001065 DEF CONP
001065 DEF CONP
001065 DEF CONP
001065 DEF CONP
001065 DEF CONP
000389 PT RETIR
000389 PT RETIR
000389 PT RETIR
DATA STORAGE/INSERTS
80% CONTRACT CLASS
80% CONTRACT CLASS
JUNE RENT/PAY CAM
JUNE RENT/PAY CAM
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-162-999-5208
001-100-999-5208
190-180-999-5212
310-164-999-5214
001-120-999-5250
001-100-999-5260
001-2170
001-163-999-5220
190-180-999-5250
190-183-999-5330
001-2120
100-2120
190-2120
280-2120
100-164-999-5243
190-180-999-5243
340-199-999-5250
190-180-999-5250
001-2080
100-2080
190-2080
300-2080
320-2080
340-2080
001-2160
100-2160
190-2160
001-120-999-5250
190-183-999-5330
190-183-999-5330
340-199-999-5212
340-199-999-5234
ITEM
AMOUNT
56.40
156.72
200.00
141.98
200.00
62.50
52.80
50.50
50.40
331.20
78.90
1.00
17,00
.60
23.00
18.85
30,75
16.75
2,265.02
197,98
156,32
3,47
312,50
50,00
215,22
93.00
583.32
189.36
96.00
48.00
81.17
29,780.55
CHECK
AMOUNT
403.26
200.00
141.98
200.00
62.50
52.80
50.50
50.40
331.20
97.50
89.35
2,985.29
891.54
189.36
96.00
48.00
29,861.72
TOTAL CHECKS 163,517,53
VOUCHRE2
06/0Z/9~
15:~1
CITY OF TEHECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
p~r., 2
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
100 GAS TAX FUND
190 CONNUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
210 CAPITAL IHPROVENENT PROJ FUND
250 CAPITAL PROJECTS - TCSD
280 REDEVELOPHENT AGENCY - CiP
TOTAL
Nq(I.NT
19,978.19
2,256.75
38,866./,5
1,/,25. O0
14,377.Z3
3,200.00
1/8.71
80,252.33
VOUCh2
06, ',
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
15316
15317
15318
15318
15318
15318
15318
15318
15318
15318
15319
15319
15319
15319
15319
15319
15319
15319
15319
15319
15319
15319
15319
15319
15320
15320
15321
15322
15323
15323
15:41
CHECK
DATE
06/14/94
06/14/94
06/14/94
06/14/94
06/14/94
06/14/94
06/14/94
06/14/94
06/14/94
06/14/94
06/14/94
06/14/94
06/14/94
06/14/94
06/14/94
06/14/94
06/14/94
06/14/94
06/14/94
06/14/94
06/14/94
06/14/94
06/14/94
06/14/94
06/14/94
06/14/94
06/14/94
06/14/94
06/14/94
06/14/94
06/14/94
06/14/94
VENDOR
NUMBER
001446
001294
000123
000123
000123
000123
000123
000123
000123
000123
000126
000126
000126
000126
000126
000126
000126
000126
000126
000126
000126
000126
000126
000126
000126
000126
001207
001207
000230
000678
000539
000539
VENDOR
NAME
ARMOR CUSTOM MELD & FAB
BESWICK, STEVE
BURKE WILLIANS & SORENS
BURKE W]LLIANS & SORENS
BURKE WlLLIANS & SORENS
BURKE W]LLIANS & SORENS
BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENS
BURKE WILLIANS & SORENS
BURKE WILLJAMS & SORENS
BURKE WILLJAMS & SORENS
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE HA
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE HA
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE HA
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE HA
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE HA
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE HA
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE HA
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE HA
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE HA
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA
MARTIN J. JASKA, INC.
MARTIN J. JASKA, INC.
MUNI FINANCIAL SERVICES
RIVERSIDE COUNTY HEALTH
WIMMER YAMADA ASSOCIATE
WIMMER Y/M~ADA ASSOCIATE
CiTY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
REPLACE gROUGHT IRON FE
PROJECT ENGINEER
PROF SERVICES/APRIL 94
PROF SERVICES/APRiL 94
PROF SERVICES/APR%L 94
PROF SERVICES/APRIL 94
FUNDS NOT BUDGETED
FUNDS NOT BUDGETED
REDEV ATTNY SERVICES-4/
FUNDS NOT BUDGETED
PALONA DEL SOL
LANDSCAPE HAINTENANCE
LANDSCAPE HAINTENANCE
MEDIANS SERVICE AREA
KENT HINTERGARDT PARK
PALONA DEL SOL
MEDIANS SERVICE AREA
KENT H]NTERGARDT PARK
LANDSCAPE HA]NTENANCE
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE
PALONA DEL SOL PARK
LANDSCAPE HAINTENANCE
LANDSCAPE HAINTENANCE
MEDIANS SERVICE AREA
KENT HINTERGARDT PARK
LANDSCAPE HAINTENANCE
CHANGE ORDER #1/PALA PR
CHANGE ORDER #1/PALA PR
CSD ADMIN SERVICES'
ANIHAL CONTROL/MARCH
PROF. SERV. 4/1-4/30
CREDIT ADJUSTMENT
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
250-190-129-5804
100-164-999-5248
300-1~9-~-5207
190-180-999-5246
001-130-999-5246
001-1280
300-199-~-5207
190-180-~-5246
280-1~9-999-5246
280-199-9~-5246
190-180-999-5250
190-180-999-5250
190-180-999-5250
191-180-999-5415
190-180-999-5250
190-180-999-5250
191-180-999-5415
190-180-999-5250
190-180-999-5250
190-180-999-5250
190-180-999-5250
190-180-999-5250
190-180-999-5250
191-180-999-5415
190-180-~-5250
190-180-9~-5250
210-1990
210-2035
190-180-999-5370
001-172-999-5255
210-190-120-5802
210-190-120-5802
ITEM
AMOUNT
3,200.00
2,256.75
11,581.05
1,057.82
13,560.19
322.00
11,581.05-
979.89-
5,784.70
5,635.99'
3,582.81
175.00
3,762.53
475.00
3,702.44
3,582.81
475.00
3,702.44
175.00
3,762.53
3,582.81
175.00
3,762.53
475.00
3,702.44
3,582.81
14,252.00
1,425.20'
1,537.37
6,096.00
2,885.19
1,334.76-
PAGE 1
CHECK
AMOUNT
3,200.00
2,256.75
14,108.83
38,676.15
12,826.80
1,537.37
6,096.00
1,550.43
TOTAL CHECKS
80,252.33
VOUCHRE2
0512619~
14:26
CITY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REG]STER
FOR ALL PER/ODS
PA~r.~ 3
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
100 GAS TAX FUND
165 RDA DEV- LO~/NO0 SET ASIDE
190 COHHUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
210 CAPITAL INPROVENENT PROJ FUND
250 .CAPITAL PROJECTS - TCSD
280 REDEVELOPNENT AGENCY -
320 INFORHATZON SYSTENS
TOTAL
AHOUNT
316,605.31
15,315.48
3,7V5.41
9,590.18
16,903.21
21,178.00
42,763.50
13,640.71
5,503.40
445,295.20
VOUCHI~ PAGE 1
05/2 14:26
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
15212
15213
15213
15214
15215
15215
15215
15215
15215
15216
15216
15216
15216
15216
15216
15217
1F'
1:
15217
15217
15217
15217
15218
15219
15219
15219
15219
15220
15220
15220
15220
15220
15220
15220
15220
15220
15220
15220
15220
15220
15220
CHECK
DATE
06/14/94
06/14/94
06/14194
06/14/94
06/14/94
06/14/94
06/14/94
06/14/94
06/14/94
06/14/94
06/14/94
06/14/94
06/14/94
06/14/94
06/14/94
06/14/94
06/14/94
06/14/94
06/14/94
06/14/94
06/14/94
06/14/94
06/14/94
06/14/94
06/14/94
.06/14/94.
06/14/94
06114/94
06114/94
06/14194
06/14/94
06/14/94
06/14194
06/14/94
06/14/94
06/14/94
06/14/94
06/14/94
06/14/94
06/14/94
06/14/94
VENDOR
NUMBER
001281
001294
001294
O001ZS
000135
000135
000135
000135
000135
000447
000447
000447
000447
000447
000447
000754
000754
000754
000754
000754
000754
000754
001408
001056
001056
001056
001056
000178
000178
000178
000178
000178
000178
000178
000178
000178
000178
000178
000178
000178
000178
VENDOR
NAME
ALHAMBRA GROUP
BESWICK, STEVE
BESWICK, STEVE
BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENS
CENTRAL CITXES SIGN SER
CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER
CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER
CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER
CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER
CONTRONIX OF HEMET
CONTRONIX OF HEMET
COMTRONIX OF HEMET
COMTRONIX OF HEMET
CONTRONIX OF HEMET
COHTRONIX OF HEMET
ELLIOTT GROUP, THE
ELLIOTT GROUP, THE
ELLIOTT GROUP, THE
ELLIOTT GROUP, THE
ELLIOTT GROUP, THE
ELLIOTT GROUP, THE
ELLIOTT GRQUP~ THE
ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL S
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO
GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO
GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO
GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO
GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO
GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO
GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO
GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO
GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO
GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO
GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO
GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO
GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO
GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
DESIGN SERVICES/HICKS P
WORKERS CONP 4/1-5/1/94
ENGINEER SERVICES/APRIL
LEGAL SERVICES 4/30
SIGN ORDER
10"' QUICK-PUNCH POST
ANCHORS
TAX
SIGN ORDER
UNIDEN, MODEL SPS 320TS
UNIDEN, MGOEL APX 181A,
UNIDEN, MODEL APX 185,
UNIDEN, MOOEL APX 115,
DISCOUNT ON MERCHANDISE
TAX
MISC. LANDSCAPE REVIE~
LANDSCAPE REVIEW
MISC. LANDSCAPE REVIEW
LANDSCAPE PAINT,
INSPECTION SERVICES
PLAN CHECK REVIEW
MISC, LANDSCAPE REVIEW
DEMOLISH & REMOVE STRUC
SLOPE SERVICE AREA A/HA
PAY LANDSCAPE PAINT
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE
SLOPE SERVICE AREAS B &
4MB SIHN MEMORY MODULE
FREIGHT
TAX
MOTHERBOARD REPLACEMENT
2lOMB HARD DRIVE REPL F
IDE CONTROLLER
FREIGHT
TAX
COLORADO 250 TAPE"B/U I
FREIGHT
TAX
210MB HARD DRIVE
FREIGHT
TAX
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
280-199-805-5802
001-1182
100-164-999-5248
001-130-999-5246
100-164-999-5244
100-162,-999-5244
100-16~-999-5244
100-164-999-52t.~.
100-164-999-5244
001-171-999-5610
001-171-999-5610
001-171-999-5610
001-171-999-5610
001-171-999-5610
001-171-999-5610
001-161-999-5248
001-161-999-5250
001-161-999-5248
190-180-999-5250
190-180-999-5250
193-180-999-5250
001-161-999-5248
001-162-999-5250
193-180-999-5415
193-180-999-5415
190-180-999-5250
193-180-999-5415
320-199-999-5215
320-199-999-5215
320-199-999-5215
320-199-999-5215
320-199-999-5215
320-199-999-5215
320-199-999-5215
3Z0-199-999-5Z15
001-171-999-5221
001-171-999-5221
001-171-999-5221
001-171-999-5221
001-171-999-5221
001-171-999-5Z21
ITEM
AMOUNT
9,845.29
108.07-
2,495.70
4,143,43
2,999.93
2,684.50
Z,O8Z.50
369,44
52.41
999.00
59.00
12.00
115.00
177.75-
78.06
1,025.00
655.00
200.00
545.00
535.00
900.00
450.00
9,100.00
4,295.00
405.97
6,877.81
11,302.24
636.00
2.00
49.29
445.00
200.00
90.00
10.00
56.96
175.00
.01
13.55
200.00
.01
15,49
CHECK
AMOUNT
9,8~5.29'
2,387.63
4,143.43
8,188.78
1,085.31
4,310.00
9,100.00
22,881.02
1,893.31
06/14/94 001429 INACON INFORMATION SYST STORAGE DIMENSION 2.1GB 320-199-999-5221 2,540.00
VOUCHRE2 PAGF_,.2
05/26/92, 14:26
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
15221
15222
15223
15224
15225
15226
15226
15227
15228
15228
15228
15228
15228
15228
15228
15228
15228
15228
15229
15230
15230
15231
15231
15231
15231
15232
15232
15233
15233
15233
15233
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER
06/14/94
06/14/94
06/14/94
06/14/94
06/14/94
06/14/94
06/14/94
06/14/94
06/14/94
06/14/94
06/14/94
06/14/94
06/14/94
06/14/94
06/14/94
06/14/94
06/14/94
06/14/94
06/14/94
06/14/94
06/14/94
06/14/94
06/14/94
06/14/94
06/14/94
06/14/94
06/14/94
001429
000202
000883
000230
001007
001383
001383
001169
000406
000406
000406
000406
000406
000406
000406
000406
000406
000406
000513
000929
000929
000329
000329
000329
000329
000539
000539
000820
000820
000820
000820
INACON INFORMATION SYST TAX
J.F. DAVIDSON ASSOCIATE
MONTELEONE EXCAVATING
MUNI FINANCIAL SERVICES
NPG CORP.
PMW ASSOCIATES
PMW ASSOCIATES
RIVERSIDE COUNTY CLERK
RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF
RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF
RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF
RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF
RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF
RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF
RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF
RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF
RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF
RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF
SIMMONS, BECKY MCLEAN
T.B. PENtCK & SONS, INC
T.B. PENICK & SONS, INC
URBAN DESIGN STUDIO
URBAN DESIGN STUDIO
URBAN DESIGN STUDIO
URBAN DESIGN STUDIO
WINHER YAMADA ASSOCIATE
WIMMER YANADA ASSOCIATE
WlNCHAK, KR~S
MINCHAK, KRIS
~INCHAK, KRIS
WlNCHAK, KRIS
06/14/94
06/14/94
06/14/94
06/14/94
320-199-999-5221
DESIGN SERVICES/SPORTS 210-190-137-5802
"EMERGENCY" BACKF ILL 100-1270
ASSESSMENT SERVICES 190-180-999-5370
"EMERGENCY" STREET & Sl 100'1270
APRIL CONSULTANT
APRIL CONSULTANT
280-199-999-5248
165-199-999-5250
FILING OF NOD/SPORTS PA 210-190-137-5802
MARCH POLICE SERVICES
MARCH POLICE SERVICES
MARCH POLICE SERVICES
MARCH POLICE SERVICES
MARCH POLICE SERVICES
MARCH POLICE SERVICES
MARCH POLICE SERVICES
MARCH POLICE SERVICES
MARCH POLICE SERVICES
MARCH POLICE SERVICES
001-170-999-5288
001-170-999-5299
001-170-999-5298
001-170-999-5290
001-170-999-5291
001-170-999-5281
001-170-999-5282
001-170-999-5262
001-170-999-5294
001-1230
ON-SITE SOFTWARE TRAINI 320-199-999-5250
CRC CONSTRUCTION
RETENTION HELD
250-190-12-9-5804
250-2035
PARTIAL RETENTION
OLD TOWN SPECIFIC ~LAN
RETENTION
CREDIT MEMO
001-2035
001-161-999-5248
001-2035
001-161-999-5248
PROF SERVICES/PALA ROAD 210-190-120-5802
PALA PARK AMENDMENT 210-190-120-5802
REINBURSABLES/NOTARY 190-180-999-5250
CREDIT k/ORKERS CONP 001-1182
PALA RD DRAINAGE RESEAR 001-163-999-5250
PLAN CHECK SERVICES - 0 001-16~-999-5249
TOTAL CHECKS
ITEM
AMOUNT
199,15
10,150,00
2,931.00
1,537.37
1,700.00
3,795.42
3,795.41
1,328.00
192,761.92
14,481.62
23,378.40
6,809.84
6,698.81
19,470.15
3,129.70
14,522.41
7,857.74
6,698.81
1,275.00
47,515.00
4,751.50'
1,400.00
8,720.81
5,928.B-
2,792.08-
1,962.50
7,757.50
95.00
76.32-
725.00
1,812,50
CHECK
AMOUNT
2,7'~9.15'
1Q,150.00
2,931'.00
1,537.37
1,700.00
7,590.83
1,328.00
295,789.40
1,275.00
42,763.50
1;4oo.oo
9,700.00
2,556.18
445,295.20
ITEM
NO.
4
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
Mary Jane McLarney, Finance Officer
June 14, 1994
City Treasurer's Report as of April 30, 1994
PREPARED BY: Tim McDermott, Senior Accountant
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive and file the City Treasurer's
report as of April 30, 1994.
DISCUSSION: Reports to the City Council regarding the City's investment
portfolio and receipts, disbursements and fund balance are required by Government
Code Sections 53646 and 41004 respectively. The City's investment portfolio is in
compliance with the Code Sections as of April 30, 1994.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
ATTACHMENTS:
1. City Treasurer's Report as of April 30, 1994
2. SchedUle of Fund Balances as of April 30, 1994
City of Temecula
City Treasursr's Report
As of April 30, 1994
Cash Activity for the Month of April:
Cash and Investments as of April 1, 1984
Cash Receipts
Cash Disbursements
Cash and Investments as of April 30, 1984
41,4~6,584
2,788,079
(1,651,130)
42,623,533
Cash and Investments Portfolio:
Type of Investment.
Petty Cash
General Checking
Benefit Demand Deposits
Local Agency Investment Fund
Deferred Compensation Fund
Deferred Compensation Fund
Defined Contribution Fund
Trust Accounts-TCSD COPs
TruSt Accounts-RDA Bonds
Institution
City Hall
First Interstate
First Interstate
State Treasurer
ICMA
PEBSCO
PEBSCO
Bank of America
Bank of America
Yield
4.333%
3.160%
3.160%
Balance
800
233,262
6,058
29, 103,523
274,408
227,406
16,091
506,083
12,255,902
$ 42,623,533
(1)
(1)
(1)-This amount is net of outstanding checks.
Per Government Code Requirements, this Treasurer's Report is in compliance with
the City of Temecula's investment policy and thers ars adequate funds available
to meet budgeted and actual expenditures of the City of Temecula for th~ next
thirty days.
City of Temecula
Schedule of Fund Balances
As of Apdl 30, 1994
Total Assets $
Less: Liabilities
Total Fund Balances
Less: Reserved Amounts (1)
Less: Designated Amounts (2)
Unreserved, Undesignated
Fund Balances $
Community
Services Redevelopment
· City District Agency Total
26,308,01 0 $ 2,201,615 $ 19,709,465 $ 48,219,090
3,372,636 6.50,096 665,744 4,688,476
22,935,374 1,551,51 9 19,043,721 43~530,614
5,271,099 614,644 5,888,540 11,774,283
10, 140,564 936,875 13, 155, 181 24,232,620
7,523,711 $ 0 $ 0 $ 7,523,711
(1) Includes amounts reserved for encumbrances, land held for resale, long-term notes receivable, low/rood housing,
and debt service.
(2) Includes amounts designated for economic uncertainty, debt service, and continuing appropriations.
ITEM 5
APPROVAL/~
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
City Clerk
June 14, 1994
Records Destruction Approval
RECOMMENDATION: Approve scheduled destruction of certain records as provided
under the City of Temecula approved Records Retention Policy.
BACKGROUND: On March 22, 1992, the City Council approved Resolution No. 92-17
which authorizes the destruction of certain city records which have become outdated, obsolete
or are excess documents, in compliance with Sections 34090 through 34090.7 of the
Government Code.
The records management program, administered by the City Clerk's Office, is in the process
of microfilming all inactive records that are over two (2) years old. The attached exhibit
details plot plans for the years 1984 through 1990 which have been copied to microfilm.
Three microfilm copies have been prepared, one to be kept in the Planning Department, one
in the City Clerk's records vault and one in permanent off-site storage.
A second request has been received from the Human Resources Division requesting
destruction of obsolete personnel recruitment materials. A list of these records is also
attached. These records do not require permanent storage on microfilm under the provisions
of the Records Retention Policy.
The City Attorney has reviewed this request and has signed Exhibit "1" of the Annual Review
as provided for in Resolution No. 92-17. '.
ATTACHMENTS:
JSG
Destruction of Records Request - Human Resources
Destruction of Records Request
List of Records recommended for destruction
CITY OF TEMECULA
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
June Greek, City Clerk
Grant Y~s, Human Resources Administrator
April 18, 1994
SUBJECT:
Destruction of Records
Pursuant to Resolution No. 92-17, the retention period for the following records has
been satisfied and the records can be destroyed at this time.
APPLICATIONS MATERIALS FOR:
Senior Planner
Volunteer Coordinator
Planning Technician
Account Clerk
Senior Development Assistant
Permit Engineer
Senior Public Works Inspector
Senior Management Analyst
Maintenance Worker
Maintenance Supervisor
Principal Engineer
Senior Accountant
Office Assistant/Facilities Technician
Associate Planner
Assistant Planner
Maintenance Superintendent
Lead Maintenance Worker
Traffic/Engineering Technician
Senior Recreation Services Coordinator
RECRUITMENT DATE
06/91
06/91
06/91
06/91
07/91
07/91
07/91
07/91
07/91
07/91
08/91
08/91
09/91
09/91
09/91
09/91
11/91
12/91
12/91
TO: City Clerk
FROM: Gail Zigler,
Office Specialist
DATE: June 14, 1994
SUBJECT: Destruction of Records Request
Attached is a print out of Plot Plans (Retention Type 20324) dating from 1984
through 1990 and Administrative Plot Plans (Retention Type 20301 ) dated 1990..
These records have been microfilmed in triplicate with a copy distributed to the City
Clerk's Records Vault, the Planning Department and a copy to the Vault in San
Diego.
The following have reviewed and approved this destruction request.
Pursuant to the requirements of Government Code Section 34090, I hereby give my
consent to the destruction of records under the direction of the City Clerk pursuant
to the City of Temecula's adopted Destruction of Obsolete Records Policy.
Department Headi.
City Attorney:
R:\forms\destruct.rqs
RRDESTY...RR061 Cit~/of Teme~uta Doc. Ref ......... 161 Page 1
05/18/1994 Files Ready for Destruction Retention Code... 20324 10:25:32
Destruction Date. 05/ol/199&
Ooc. item Rat. File Reference # Storege l4edie
Ref. Date Ref. Brief Description Code Security CLams Storage Location Location Ref, ~
161 09/28/198~ 7874 PLot PLan 7874 20326 0006 Film 3821H1AOOQ1
Group ! 161/120/The Vault
161 0~/14/1987 9887 PLot PLan 9887 20324 QQQ6 FILm 3821.1A0001
Group ! 161/120/The Vault
161 06/04/1987 9883 PLot PLan 9883 20324 QQQ6 Film 3821H1AOOQ1
'Group ! 161/12Q/The Vault
. .. .................................................... ~ ...........
161 06/12/1987 9891 PLot PLan 9891 20324 QQQ6 FILm 3821H1AOOOl
Gro~ ! 161/12Q/The Vault
161 06/12/1987 990? PLot PLan 990? 20324 0006 Film 3821H1AQQQ1
Group Z 161/12Q/The VauL;t
161 06/15/1987 9896 PLot PLan 9896 20326 QO06 Film 3821N1A0001
Group i 161/12Q/The Vault
161 06/15/1987 9897 PLot PLan 989? 2(3324 QQQ5 FILm 3821N1AQQQ1
Group ! 161/120/The Vault
161 06/15/1987 9898 PLot PLan 9898 20324 0006 FILm 3821N1AO001
Group i 161/120/The Vault
161 06/16/1987 9930 Plot PLan 9930 20324 0006 Film 3821H1AOOOl
Group Z 161/120/The Vault
161 06/17/1987 9915 PLot PLan 9915 20324 0006 Film 3821N1AQOOl
Group [ 161/12Q/The Vault
161 06/22/1987 9908 PLot PLan 9908 20324 0006 Film 3821H1AOOOl
Group I 161/12Q/The Vault
161 06/22/1987 9909 PLot PLan 9909 20324 0006 Film 3821NIAOO01
Group ! 161/120/The Vault
161 06/22/1987 9911 PLot PLan 9911 20324 0006 Film 3821NIAOO01
Group I 161/12Q/the Vault
161 06/22/1987 9929 PLot PLan 9929 20324 0006 Film 3821NIAOOO1
Group ! 161/120/The Vault
161 06/23/1987 9885 PLot PLan 9885 2~24 0006 Film 3821MIAOOO1
~roup Z 161/120/The Vault
161 06/9/1987 9903 PLot PLan 9903 20326 0006 Film 3821NIAOOO1
Group Z 161/120/The Vault
161 06/9/1987 991X PLot PLan 990~ 20324 0006 Film :3821NIAOOO1 -
Group ! 161/120/The Vault
161 06/23/1987 9910 PLot PLan 9910 20324 0006 Film 3821NIAOOO1
Group I 161/12Q/The Vault
RRDESTY...RR061 City of TemecuLa Page 2
05/18/199/* FiLes Reedy for Destruction 10:25:32
Do- ]tem Ret. FiLe Reference # Storage 14edie
Re Date Ref. Brief Description Code Security CLass Storage Lecetion Location Reference
161 06/2/*/1987 9925 PLot PLan 9925 2032A 0006 FiLm 3821N1AO001
Group ] 161/120/The VauLt
161 07/01/1987 9927 PLot PLan 9927 2032/, 0006 FiLm 38Z1NIAO001
Group ] 161/120/The VauLt
161 07/01/1987 995/* PLot PLan 995/* 2032/* 0006 FiLm 3821H1AO001.
· Group ] 161/120/The VauLt
161 07/06/1987 9928 PLot PLan 9928 2032/* 0006 FiLm 3821N1AO001
· Group I 161/120rrhe VauLt
161 07/06/1987 99/*9 PLot PLan 99/*9 2032/, 13006 FiLm 3821N1AO001
Group I 161/120/The VauLt
161 07/06/1987 997/* PLot PLan 997/, 2032/* 0006 FiLm 3821N1AO001
Group i 161/120/The VauLt
161 07/07/1987 10002 PLot PLan 10002 2032/, 0006 FiLm 3821N1AO001
Group [ 161/120/The VauLt
161 07/07/1987 10029 PLot PLan 10029 2032/, 0006 FiLm 3821N1AO001.
Group i 161/120/The VauLt
16. 7/08/3987 9981 PLot PLan 9981 2032/* 0006 FiLm 3821N1AO001
Group I 161/120/The VauLt
161 07/09/1987 998~ PLot PLan 998~ 2032/, 0006 FiLm 3821N1AO001
Group I 161/120/The VauLt
161 07/13/1987 9976 PLot PLan 9976 2032/, 0006 FiLm 3821N1AO001
Group I 161/120/The VauLt
161 07/16/1987 10011 PLot PLan 10011 2032/, 0006 FiLm 3821M1AO001
, Group I 161/120/The VauLt
161 07/17/1987 9992 PLot PLan 9992 2032/* 0006 FiLm 3821M1AO001
Group I 161/120/The VauLt
161 07/17/1987 9993 PLot PLan 9993 2032/* 0006 FiLm 3821M1AO001
Group I 161/120rrhe vault
161 07/17/1987 9995 PLot PLan 9995 2032/, 0006 FiLm 3821M1AO001
~rOUp [ 161/120/The VauLt
161 07/17/1987 9996 PLot PLan 9996 2032/, 0006 FiLm 3821NIAO001
Groq~ I 161/120/The VauLt
161 _ 0712011987 9985 PLot PLan 9985 2032/, 0006 FILm 3821N1AOOO1
Group i 161/120/The VauLt
161' 07/22/1987 10007 PLot PLan 10007 2032/* 0007 FiLm 3821N1AOOOl
Group I 161/120/The VauLt
RRDESTY,,.RRO61 City of Temec:uLa Page 3
05/18/1994 Files Ready for Destruction 10:25:32
D~. item Rat. File Reference # Storage Hedia ~'
Ref, Date Ref, Brief Description Code S~urity CL,s Storage Location Location Refe
161 0~2~1987 100~ PLot PLan 10008 2~ 0006 FIts :3821N1A0001
Group ! 161/120/The Vault
............................................................... ;..
161 0~2~1987 10016 PLot PLan 10016 2~24 0006 FILm 3821H1AO001
Group ] 161/120/The~utt
161 0~2~1987 9990 PLot PLan 9990 203~ 0006 Film 3~lH1AOO01
Group I 161/120/The Vault'
161 07~1987 10032 PLot PL~ 10032 2~ 0006 Film 3821N1AOOO1
Group Z 161/120/The Vault
................................. ; ................................
161 08/03/1987 10048 PLot PLan 10045 2~ 0000 FILm 3821N1AO001
Group i 161/12D/The Vault
161 08/04/1987 10043 PLot PLan 10045 20324 0006 Film 3~1H1AOOOl
Group i 161/120/The Vault
161 08/05/1987 10065 PLot PLan 10065 2~24 0000 Film 3821H1AO001
Group i 161/120/The Vault
161 05/0~1957 10~1 PLot PLan 10~1 2~24 0006 Film 3821H1AO001
Group I 161/120/The VauLt
161 08/13/1987 10060 PLot PLan 10060 2~24 0006 FiLm 3821NIA0001
Group I 161/120/The~uLt
161 08/14/1987 100~ PLot Pt~ 100~ 2B~ 0006 FiLm 3~1NIA0001
Group % 161/120/The VauLt
161 08/14/1987 10266 PLot PLan 10266 2~24 0007 FiLm 3821N1A0001
Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 08/1~1987 10113 PLot PLan 10113 2~24 0007 FiLm 3821NIA0001
Group i 161/120/The VauLt
161 08/24/1987 100~ PLot PLan 100~ 2824 00~ FiLm 3821NIA0001
Group [ 161/120/The ~utt
161 08/~/1987 100~ PLot PLan 100~ 2~24 0000 ' FiLm 3821N1A0001
Group I 161/120/The ~utt
161 ~/28/1987 100~ PLot PLan 100~ 2~24 0007 FiLm 3821NIA0001 '
~roup.l 161/120/The VauLt
161 09/01/1987 10079 PLot PLan 10079 2~24 0006 FiLm ~821NIAOO01
Group I 161/1~he VauLt
161 0~02/1987 10080 PLot PLan 10080 2~ 0007 FiLm 3821N1A0001 *-
Group I 161/120~he VauLt
161 09/02/1987 10082 PLot PLan 1002 20324 0007 FiLm 3821N1A0001
Group I 161/120/The VauLt
RRDESTY...RR061 .City of Tamecuts Page 4
05/18/1994 Files Ready for DestructiQn 10:25:32
D~' item Rat. File Reference # Storage Nedia
~ / Date ' Ref. Brief Description Code Security CLass Storage Location Location Reference
161 09/02/1987 10142 PLot PLan 10142 20324 0007 Film 3821N140001
Group i 161/120/The Vault
161 09/08/1987 10081 PLot PLan 10081 2032/* 0007 Film 3821N140001
Group I 161/120rrhe Vault
161 09/08/1987 10179 Plot Plan 10179 2032/* 0007 Film 3821N140001
· Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 09/10/1987 10088 PLot PLan 10088 2032/, 0007 Film 3821N140001
Group I 161/120rrhe Vault
161 09/11/1987 10118 PLot PLan 10118 2032/* 0007 Film 3821N140001
Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 09/lz~/1987 10112 PLot PLan 10112 2032/* 0007 Film 3821N140001
Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 09/15/1987 1011/* PLot PLan 1011/* 2032/* 0007 Film :3821M140001
Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 09/15/1987 10182 PLot PLan 10182 262/* 0007 Film 3821N140001
Group ! 161/120/The Vault
I 09/17/1987 10122 PLot PLan 10122 20324 0007 Film 3821N140001
Grot4~ I 161/120/The Vault
161 09/18/1987 10121 PLot Plan 10121 20324 0007 FILm 3821N140001
Group I 161/120rrhe Vault
161 09/18/1987 101~4 PLot PLan 101/.4 20324 0007 Film 3821N140001
Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 09/22/1987 10131 PLot PLan 10131 20324 0007 FILm 3821N140001
Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 09/22/1987 10203 PLot PLan 10203 2032/* 0007 FILm 3821N140001
Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 09/28/1987 10206 PLot Plan 10206 2032/* 0007 Film 3821N140001
Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 09130/1987 10143 PLot PLan 101/.3 2032/* 0007 Film 3821M140001 '
'Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 09/30/1987 101/.5 PLot PLan 10145 20324 0007 Film 3821M140001
Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 09/30/1987 10177 PLot PLan 10177 2032/* 0007 FILm 3821M140001
Group i 161/120rrhe Vault
161' 10/05/1987 10161 PLot PLan 10161 2032/* 0007 Film 3821M140001
Group Z 161/120/The Vault
RRDESTY...BBQ61 City of Teemcalm Page S
05/18/1994 Files Reedy for DestreK:Lion 10:25:32
D~. Item Rat. File Reference # Storage Media
Ref. Date Ref. Brief Description Code Security CLass Storage Location Location Refel
161 10/05/1987 10218 PLot PLan 10218 20324 0007 FILm 3821HIAOOO1
Group ! 161/120rrhe Vault
161 10/06/1987 10172 PLot PLan 10172 20324 0007 FILm 3821HIAO001
Group ! 161/120/The Vault
· 161 10/06/1987 10205 PLot PLan 10205 20324 0007 Film 3821H1AO001
Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 10/07/1987 10230 PLot PLan 10230 20324 0007 Film 3821H1AO001
· Grot4~ i 161/120/The Vault
161 10/09/1987 10169 PLot PLan 10169 20324 0007 Film' 3821H1AO001
Group ! 161/120/The Vault
161 10/09/1987 10171 PLot PLan 10171 20324 0007 Film 3821H1AO001
Group i 161/12Q/The Vault
161 10/12/1957 10215 PLot PLan 10215 20324 0007 Film 3821H1AO001
Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 10/13/1987 10176 PLot PLan 10176 20)24 0007 Film 3821H1AO001
Group Z 161/120/The Vault
161 10/14/1987 10196 PLot PLan 10196 20324 0007 Film 3821H1AO001
Group i 161/120/The Vault
161 10/15/1987 10227 PLot PLan 10227 20324 0007 Film 3821H1AO001
Group Z 161/120/The Vault
161 10/2011987 101~ PLot PLan 101~ 2~24 0007 Film 3821H1AO001
Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 10/20/1987 10178 PLot PLan 10178 20324 0007 Film 3821HIAO001
Group ! 161/120/The Vault
161 10/20/1987 10229 PLot PLan 10229 2~24 0007 Film 3821H1AO001
Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 10/21/1987 10235 PLot PLan 10235 20324 0007 Film 3821N1AO001
Group ! 161/120/The Vault
............ : .....................................................
161 10/22/1987 10232 PLot PLan 10232 20324 0007 Film 3821HIAO001
GYoup ! 161/120/The Vault
161 10122/1987 10234 PLot PLan 10Z3~ 20324 0007 Film 3821H1AO001
Group i 161/120/The Vault
161 10123/1987 9~23 PLot PLan 9923 20324 0006 Film 3821H1AO001
Group i 161/120/The Vault
161' 10/26/1987 10243 PLot PLan 10243 ' 20324 0007 Film 3821H1AO001
Group i 161/120/The Vault
RRDESTY...RR061 City of TemecuLa Page 6
05/18/1994 Files Ready for Destruction 10:25:32
D~ item Ret. File Reference # Storage Media
R~ Date Ref. Brief Description Code Security CLass Storage Location Location Reference
161 10/31/1987 101~ PLot PLan 10174 20324 OOO7 FiLm 3821N1AOQO1
Group i 161/120/The VauLt
............................................................... ~ . .
161 11/03/1987 10242 PLot PLan 10242 20:324 0007 FiLE 3821H1A0001
Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 11/04/1987 10293 PLot PLan 10293 20324 0007 Film 3821~1A0001
Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 1111011987 10274 PLot PLan 10274 20324 0007 FiLm 3821N1AO001
Groin) ] 161/120/The VauLt
161 11/18/1987 10283 PLot PLan 10283 20324 QQQ7 FiLm 3821H1AQOQ1
Group i 161/120/The VauLt
161 12/07/1987 10278 PLot PLan 10278 20324 OQ07 FiLm 3821N1AO001
Group [ 161/120/The VauLt
161 12/08/1987 10288 PLot PLan 10288 20324 QO0? FiLm 3821NlAQOQ1
Group ! 161/120/The VauLt
161 12/09/1987 10287 PLot PLan 10287 20324 0007 Film 3821H1AO001
Group ! 161/12Q/The Vault
1~ ,2/17/1987 10298 PLot PLan 10298 20324 0007 Film 3821N1AO001
Group i 161/120rrhe Vault
161 12/9/1987 10296 PLot PLan 10296 20324 0007 Film 3821N1AO001
Group ] 161/120rrhe Vault
161 01/22/1988 47 PLot PLan 47 20324 0005 Film 3821NIAO001
Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 03/21/1989 10096 PLot PLan 10096 20324 ~007 Film 3821N1AOO01
Group Z 161/120/The Vault
161 12/22/1989 10054 Plot Plan 10054 20324 0006 Film 3821H1AOOO1
Group X 161/120/The Vault
161 ~/21/1990 26 Plot PLan 26 20324 0005 Film 3821NIAO001
Group i 161/120/The VauLt
161 03/26/19~0 33 PLot PLan 33 20324 0005 FILm 3821HIAOO01
~roup I 161/120/The Vault
161 04/05/1F~0 11 PLot PLan 11 20324 0005 Film 3821NIAOOO1
Group [ 161/120/The Vault
161 04/05/1~0 12 PLot PLan 12 20324 0005 Film 3821H1AO001
Group I 161/120/The Vault
161' 04/20/1~0 13 PLot PLan 13 20)24 0005 Film 3821MIAOOO1
Group ] 161/120/The Vault
RRDESTY...RR061 CtCy of Tamecalm Page 7
05/18/1994 FiLes Ready for Destruction 10:25:32
Doc, item Ret, File Reference # Storage Media
Ref, Date Ref, Brief Description Code Security CLass Storage Location Location Reft
161 ~/20/1990 28 PLot PLan 28 20326 QOO5 Film 3821NIAOOO1
Group i 161/120/The Vault
161 04/26/1990 14 PLot PLan 16 20326 0005 Film 3821H1AO001
Group i 161/12Q/The Vault
161 04/26/1990 21 PLot PLan 21 20326 0005 Film 3821H1AOO0~
Group Z 161/12Q/The Vault
161 04/27/1990 15 PLot PLan 15 20326 0005 Film 3821H1AO001
Group i 161/120/The Vault
161 04/27/19~0 16 PLot PLan 16 20326 0005 FILm 3821N1AOOO1
Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 0412711990 17 PLot Plan 17 20324 0005 Film 3821M1AO001
Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 05/04/1990 25 PLot PLan 25 20324 0005 Film 3821M1AO001
Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 05/04/1990 27 PLot PLan 27 20324 0005 Film 3821N1AO001
Group i 161/120/The Vault
161 05/05/1990 61 PLot PLan 61 20324 0006 Film 3821N1AQO01
Group [ 161/120/The Vault
161 05/08/1990 35 PLot PLan 35 20326 0005 Film 3821N1AO001
Group i 161/12Q/The Vault
161 05/11/1990 31 PLot PLan 31 20324 0005 Film 3821N1AOO01
Group i 161/120/The Vault
161 05/14/1990. 36 PLot PLan 36 20324 0005 Film 3821M1AQO01
Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 05/16/19990 ~ PLot PLan~4 20324 0005 Film 3821N1AQO01
Group i 161/120/The Vault
161 05/18/1990 39 PLot PLan 39 20324 0005 Film 3821N1AO001
Group i 161/120/The Vault
............ ; .....................................................
161 05/9/1990 45 PLot PLan 45 20324 0005 Film 3821N1AO001
~roup i 161/120/The Vault
......... ; ........................................................
161 05/9/1990 46 PLot PLan 66 20326 0005 FiLE 3821N1AOOO1
Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 05/25/1990 42 PLot PLan 62 20326 0005 FiLE 3821NIAO001
Group i 161/120/The Vault
161' 05/25/1990 63 PLot PLan 63 20324 0005 Film 3821N1AOOOl
Group i 161/120/The Vault
RRDESTY...RRQ61 City of TamecaLm Page 8
05/18/1996 FiLes Reedy for Destruction 10:25:32
Doc~ Item Ret. FiLe Reference # Storage Media
Re'l Date Ref. Brief Description Code Security CLass Storage Location Location Reference
161 05/25/1990 68 PLot PLan68 20326 QOQ5 FILm 3821NIAQOOl
Group I 161/12Q/The VauLt
............................................................... ;..
161 05/25/1990 69 PLot PLan 69 20326 0005 FiLm 3821NIAO001
Group I 161/120/The VauLt
....................... ; ..........................................
161 05/29/1990 51 PLot PLan 51 20326 0005 FiLm 3821H1AO001
Group I 161/120/The VauLt
161 05/29/19~0 58 PLot PLan 58 20326 0006 FiLm 3821HIAO001
Group I 161/120/The VauLt
161 05/31/1990 1183 PLot PLan 20326 000200011361 FiLm 3821N1AO001
Group i 161/120/The VauLt
161 05/31/1990 1186 PLot PLan 20326 000200011372 FiLm 3821HIAO001
Group i 161/120/The VauLt
161 05/31/1990 53 PLot PLan 53 20326 0005 FiLm 3821N1AO001
Group I 161/120/The VauLt
161 06/01/1990 52 PLot PLan 52 20326 0005 FiLm 3821NIAO001
Group ! 161/120/The VauLt
16', ~/05/1990 123 PLot PLan 123 20326 0006 FiLm 3821N1AO001
Group I 161/120/The VauLt
161 06/05/1990 62 PLot PLan 62 20326 0006 FiLm 3821N1AO001
Group I 161/120/The VauLt
161 06/05/lc~'0 63 PLot PLan 63 20326 0006 FiLm 3821H1AO001
Group I 161/120/The VauLt
..., ...... ; .......................................................
161 06/05/19~0 92 PLot PLan 92 · 20326 0006 FiLm 3821N1AO001
Group [ 161/120/The VauLt
161 06/06/1990 8~ PLot PLan 8~ 20326 0006 FILm 3821HIAO001
Group I 161/120/The VauLt
161 06/06/19~0 85 PLot PLan 85 20326 0006 FiLm 3821NIAO001
Group Z 161/120/The VauLt
............ : .....................................................
161 06/07/1990 56 PLot PLan 56 20326 0005 FiLm 3821N1AO001 -
Group Z 161/120/The VauLt
161 06/08/1990 126 PLot PLan 126 20326 0006 FiLm 3821NIAO001
Groq~ ! 161/120/The VauLt
161 06/08/1990 56 PLot PLan 56 20326 0005 FiLm 3821NIAO001
Group I 161/120/The VauLt
161' 06/08/1990 59 PLot PLan 59 20324 0006 FiLm :3821X1AO001 .
Group ! 161/120/The VauLt
RRDESTY...RR061 City of Teamcute Page 9
05/18/199/* FiLes Ready for Destruction 10:25:32
Date
ire. Rat. FILe Reference # Storage Neclia
Ref. Brief Description Code Security CLass Storage Location Location Refer
161 06/08/1990 60 PLot PLan 60 2032/* 0006 Film 3821NIAOO01
Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 06/08/1990 86 PLot PLan 86 2032/, 0006 Film 3821NIAOO01
Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 06/12/1990 88 PLot PLan 88 20~2/* 0006 Film 3821N1AO001
Group ] 161/120/The Vault
161 06/15/1990 6~ PLot PLan 6~ 2032/* 0006 Film 3821N1AO001
Group i 161/120/The Vault
161 06/17/1990 100 PLot PLan 100 2032/* 0006 Film 3821N1AO001
Group i 161/120/The Vault
161 06/22/1990 70 PLot PLan 70 2032/* 0006 FiLm 3821N1A0001
Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 06/22/1990 71 PLot PLan 71 20~2/* 0006 Film 3821H1A0001
Group ! 161/120/The Vault
161 0612211990 73 PLot PLan 75 2032/* 0006 Film 3821N1AO001
Group i 161/120/The Vault
161 06/29/1990 75 PLot PLan 75 2032/* 0006 FiLm 3821NIAO001
Group i 161/120/The Vault
161 0612911990 77 PLot PLan 77 2032/* 0006 Film 3821NIAO001
Group I 161/1201The Vault
161 06/29/1990 79 PLot PLan 79 2032/* 0006 FiLm 3821H1AQO01
Group i 161/12Q/The Vault
161 07/03/1990 81 PLot PLan 81 , 2032/* 0006 Film 3821NIA0001
Group i 161/120/The Vault
161 07/06/1990 89 PLot PLan 89 2032/* 0006 FiLm 3821NIA0001
Group i 161/120/The Vault
161 07/06/1990 98 Plot PLan 98 2032/* 0006 Film 3821N1A0001
Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 07/12/19~0 93 PLot PLan 03 2032/, 0006 Film 3821N1AO001
~roup i 161/120/The Vault
161 07/13/1990 96 PLot PLan 96 2032/, 00136 FiLm 3821N1AO001
GroLF i 161/12Q/The VauLt
07/1611990 97 PLot PLan 97 2032/* 0006 Film 3821N1A0001
Group i 161/120rrhe Vault
07/17/1990 101 PLot PLan 101 2032/, 0006 FILm 3821N1AOOO1
Group I 161/120rrhe VauLt
RRDESTY...RR061 City of Temecuta Page 10
05/18/1994 FiLes Ready for Destruction 10:25:32
Dot- Item Rat. FiLe Reference # Storage Nedia
R Date Ref. Brief Description Code. Security CLass Storage Location Location Reference
161 0~19/1990 102 PLot PLan 102 20~24 0006 FILm 3821N1AO001
GroW> ! 161/120/The Vault
161 07/19/1990 103 PLot PLan 103 20324 0006 Film 3821N1AO001
Group i 161/120/The Vault
161 0~19/1990 104 PLot PLan 10~ 20324 0006 Film 3821NIAO001
'Group ! 161/120/The Vault
161 0~20/1990 105A PLot PLan 105A 20324 0006 FitB 3821N1AO001
Group Z 161/120iTheVautt
................................. ~ .................................
161 08/01/1990 113 PLot PLan 113 20324 0006 Film 3821N1AO001
Group i 161/120/The Vault
161 08/01/1990 114 PLot PLan 114 20324 0006 Film 3821N1AO001
Group i 161/120/The Vault
161 08/06/1990 115 PLot PLan 115 2~24 0006 Film 3821N1AO001
Group ! 161/120/The VauLt
161 08/09/1990 121 PLot'PLan 121 20324 0006 Film 3821N1AO001
Group ! 161/120/The Vault
1 38/10/1990 208 PLot PLan 208 20324 0006 Film 3821N1AO001
Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 08/14/1990 127 PLot PLan 127 20324 0006 Film 3821M1AO001
Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 08/14/1990 154 PLot PLan 154 20324 0006 Film 3821N1AO001
Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 '08/14/1990 41 PLot Plan 41 20324 0005 Film 3821NIAO001
Group L 161/120/The Vault
161 08/16/1990 131 PLot PLan 131 20324 0006 Film 3821N1AO001
Groq~ i 161/120/The Vault
161 08/20/1990 133 PLot PLan'133 20324 0006 Film 3821NIAO001
Group ] 161/120/The Vault
161 08/22/1990. 137 PLot PLan 137 20324 0006 Film 3821N1AO001
~Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 08/24/1990 145 PLot PLan 145 20324 0006 Film 3821N1AO001
Group ! 161/120/The Vault
161 08/27/1990 147 PLot PLan 147 20324 0006 Film 3821NtAO001
Group I 161/120/The Vault
16~ 08/27/1990 148 PLot PLan 148 20324 0006 Film 3821N1AO001
Group [ 161/120/The VauLt
RRDESTY...RR061 City of Tametufa Page 11
05/18/1996 FiLes Ready for Destruction 10:25:32
Doc. item Ret. FiLe Reference # Storage Hedia ~-~
Ref. Date Ref. Brief DeSCription Code Security CLass Storage Location Location Reft :
161 09/05/1990 159 PLot PLan 159 20326 0006 Film 3821H1AO001
Groq~ i 161/12Q/The Vault
............................................................... ; . .
161 09/16/1990 16~ PLot PLan 16/, 20326 0006 FiLm 3821H1AO001
Group i 161/120/The Vault
· 161 09/20/1990 168 PLot Plan 168 20326 0006 Film 3821N1AO001
Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 09/20/19990 169 PLot PLan 169 20326 0006 Film 3821N1AO001
Group i 161/120/The Vault
161 09/20/1990 172 PLot PLan 172 20326 0006 Fiom 3821H1AO001
Group i 161/120/The Vault
161 09/20/1990 174 PLot PLan 176 20326 0006 Film 3821N1AOQ01
Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 09/20/1990 175 PLot PLan 175 20326 0006 Film 3821H1AO001
Group ! 161/120/The Vault
i61 09/28/1990 177 PLot PLan 177 20326 0006 Film 3821M1AO001
Group Z 161/120/The Vault
161 10/01/1990 178 PLot Plan 178 20326 0006 Film 3821H1AO001
Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 10/02/1990 180 PLot PLan 180 20326 0006 Film 3821N1AO001
Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 10/02/1990 181 PLot Plan 181 20326 0006 Film 3821N1AO001
Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 10/11/1990 18~ PLot PLan 18~ 20326 0006 Film 3821N1AO001
Group ] 161/120/The Vault
161 10/11/1990 185 PLot PLan 185 20326 0006 Film 3821N1AO001
Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 10/15/1990 191 PLot PLan 191 20326 0006 Film )821NIAOO01
Group Z 161/120/The Vault
161 !0/18/1990 198 PLot PLan 198 20326 0006 Film 3821N1AO001 ~
~roup I 161/120/The Vault
161 10/22/1990 203 PLot PLan 203 20324 0006 Film 3821N1AO001
Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 10/23/1990 205 PLot PLan 205 20326 0006 Film 3821N1AO001 --
Group [ 161/120/The VauLt
161 10/25/1990 212 PLot PLan 212 20326 0006 Film 3821H1AO001
Group I 161/120/The VauLt
RRDESTY...RR061 City of Tamecull Page 12
05/18/199~ Files Ready for Destruction 10:25:32
Do- Item Rat. File Reference # Storage Nedia
R~ ~ Date Ref. Brief Description Code Security CLass Storage Location Location Reference
161 10/~0/1990 214 Plot PLan 21~ 20~24 0006 Film 3821N1AO001
Group ] 161/120/The Vault
161 10/30/1990 215 PLot PLan 215 20~24 O00& Film ~821N1AO001
Group I 16111ZOIThe Vault
161 1110711990 222 PLot PLan 222 2032~ 0006 Film 3821NIAO001
Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 11/08/1990 6353 PLot PLan (~53 20324 0003 Film 3821N1AO001
Group I 161/120/The Vault
....................... - ......... ; ................................
161 11/20/19~0 9955 PLot PLan 9955 20324 000~ Film 3821141A0001
Group i 161/120/The Vault
161 1Z10711990 40 PLot PLan 40 20324 0005 Film 3821N1AOO01
Group I 161/120/The Vault
20~ Records Processed
RRDESTY...RRQ61 C|ty of Tee~-uta Do¢. Ref ......... 161 Page 1
05/18/199/, FiLes Reedy for. Destruction Retention Code... 20310 10:32:58
Dest~tion Date. 05/01/199~,
Ooc. Item eeL. FiLe Reference # Storage Nedis ,
Ref. Date Ref. Brief Description Code Security CLass Storage Location Location Rare,
161 10/17/1~90 196 Administrative PLot PLea 20310 00010001143~ FiLm 3821M1AO001
Group I 161/120/The VauLt
................................................................ :..
161 11/28/1~0 26 PLot PLan 26 20310 0006 FJLB 3821M1AOO01
Group I 161/120/The VauLt
2 Records Processed
ITEM:. NO.
6
APPRO~
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM: (~,~
DATE:
City Manager/City Council
Shawn D. Nelson', Director of Community Services
June 14, 1994
SUBJECT:
Capital Improvement Project - Rancho California Sports Park Desiltation Lake
Improvement Project
PREPARED BY:/~',~,/~Hahyllis L. Ruse, Senior Management Analyst
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council:
Approve Amendment #1 for $12,000 to the design contract with J.F. Davidson
Associates, Inc. for preparation of a biological study and analysis.
Appropriate $12,000 to Capital Projects Account No. 210-190-138-5802 and approve
an operating transfer from Development Impact Fund of $12,000, establishing the
Rancho California Desiltation Lake Improvement Project.
BACKGROUND: On February 8, 1994, the City Council awarded a contract to J.F.
Davidson Associates for preliminary engineering services and preparation of schematic design
drawings for improvements to the desilting lake in the Rancho California Sports Park. In the
course of their investigation, the consultant and staff have met with a representative from the
State Department of Fish and Game. A biological study and analysis of the site is necessary
to determine the types and nature of the various habitats and species that may be impacted
by the improvement project. This study will assist in documenting any mitigation provisions
required by the project. Finally, the study is necessary for the consultant to complete an
accurate construction cost estimate.
The City Council originally allocated $25,000 from General Fund for this project in fiscal year
1992/93. A hydrolog'y study was completed for $6,000 and $18,500 is currently being used
for the design services contract. Therefore, additional funds need to be appropriated to
complete this study. ..
FISCAL IMPACT: Cost of amendment #1 to the design services contract for the biological
study is $12,000, making the total cost of design services for Phase I of the project $30,500.
It is requested that $12,000 be appropriated from the Capital Projects Account to fund this
contract.
Attachment: Amendment #1 to Design Contract
r:~c~mgend.ms~trdlmke.ci~ 0626~4
AMENDMENT NO. 01 TO CONTRACT ORDER NO. 15225
Rancho California Desiltation Lake Improvement Project
May 16. 1994
The Agreement dated February 8. 1994 between the City of Temecula and J.F.
Davidson Associates. Inc., (hereinafter referred to as "Agreement"), is hereby
amended as follows:
Re: ADDITIONAL SERVICES
Section I
Scope of Work is hereby amended to include additional services as described in
Exhibit "A" (attached).
Compensation for these additional services is a not to exceed $12,000 to be paid in
one (1) lump sum following completion of said service.
Section 2
All other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain the same.
The parties hereto have executed this Amendment on the date and year above
written.
CONSULTANT
CITY OF TEMECULA
By: By:
Ron Roberts, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peter M. Thorson, C::ity Attorney
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
v:mmendbao.jfd 061304
JFD bHTARIO 9699447761 P,'82
Exhibit "A".
pRINCipEANDASSOCIATES
CONSULTING BIOLOGISTS
April 14, 1994
39445 Avertida Bizaro
Murrieta, California 92562
(909) 677--9514
George E. Prine, Jr.
Office Manager
principal Engineer
J. F. DAVIDSON ASSOCIATES, INC.
Temecula Valley Regional Office
27349 Jefferson Avenue
Suite 115
Temecula, California 92590
Subj sot:
City of Temecula
Sports Park
Lake Desiltation Project
Biological Impact Report and
Restoration Plan
Dear George,
Thank you for selecting Principe and Associates to prepare the
Biological Impact Report and Restoration Plan for the City's Lake
Desiltation Project. I did contact the California Department of
Fish and Game for their concerns over the proposed project, and
they concur with the following'ScoPe of work:
Baseline Data Biological Gathering
Consultation will be made with others, 'existing Biological Impact
Reports submitted to the city and County for projects located in
the immediate'vicinitY of the subject site and previously prepared
Environmental Impact Reports, scientific studies, technical reports
and bulletins, reference books, and etc. The U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service's Federal Register, the California Department of
Fish and Game's Natural Diversi~y Data Base Species/CommunitY
Location SummaryReports (Bachelor Mountain, Pechanga and Temecula,
California Quadrangles) and the City of Temecula General Plan
Environmental Impact Report (Tables 9, 10 and 11) will be consulted
during the preparation of this report for a listing of the Federal
and State Sensitive Plant and Animal Species and Communities
presumed extant in the general vicinity of the site. with.the
highest probability of occurring onsite.'
George E. prine, Jr.
J. F. DAVIDSON ASSOCIATES, INC.
April '14, 1994
Page 2
Sensitive Species are defined as any unique, rare, endangered, or
threatened species. It.includes species used to delineate wetlands
and riparian corridors. It includes any host plants, plant species
used for perching or focd plants used by any animals listed as
rare, endangered or threatened- It also includes candidate species
listed by either State or Federal regulations, or species listed by
the Natural Diversity Data Base for Riverside County.
Plant and Animal field surveys will be conducted during the months
of April and May 1994. Field work will be undertaken during
morning, afternoon, and evening hours. Transects will be walked
and repeated, and cover the entire surface of the site. Field
glasses and stationary, concealed positioning techniques will be
used to observe wildlife, and careful attention will be paid to
animal sign. All Sensitive Species will be extensively searched
for in their natural habitats occurring on the site, including
Federal listed species such as the Slender-horned spineflower
(Endangered), Stephens' kangaroo rat (Endangered), the Coastal
California gnatcatcher (Threatened), and Least Bell's vireo
(Endangered)- Field surveys will also be undertaken in and around
the lake environment-
The results of all the field surveys will be presented in a format
that describes each onsite natural community on the basis of its
vegetation and habitat quality- All wildlife observed on the site
will also be described. The onsite occurrence probability/imPact
on Sensitive Species will be presented in a separate section-
Biological Resources Mapping
Mapping of the distribution of plant species occurring on the site,
and their relationship to the development proposal will be
undertaken- The most recent map is to be used. Mapping will be
done on full-sized copies of the Conceptual plan. The extent of
each plant association or habitat type on the property will be
shown in acreS. If applicable the exact location of Sensitive
Species, appropriate buffer areas and the boundaries of mitigation
proposals will be shown on the map. Also shown on the map will be
(if any) transects and any
the location of sample points.. ,
additional areas surveyed in the vicinity of the project (if
appropriate)-
~F~ ONTARIO 9~9944776Z
George ~- Prine, Jr-
J. p. DAVIDSON ASSOCIATE~, INC-
April 14, 1994,
Page 3
Impact Evaluation and Mitigation MeasUres
All direct and indirect impacts of the proposed project will be
listed, including an evaluation of impacts to threatened, rare,
endangered, or unique species- All £easible mitigation measures
proposed to reduce or eliminate significant impacts will be listed.
Mitigation measures regarding the protection of signi[icant
resources will be accompanied by a map.
Restoration Planning
The first step in developing the Restoration Plan will be to
clearly identify the kinds of Natural Communities that will be
augmented, established or maintained in their existing condition
(i.e., Lakeside Woodland, Streamside RIparian, Coastal Scrub,
etc.). Because the earth moving activities required to remove the
silt from the lake involves the use of heavy equipment, a
congtruction zone will be established in an area of the site where
a minimum o[ impact on existing biological resources will occur-
Similar zones will also be established in areas where revegetation
activities will take place- Construction zones can vary from a
simple tagging of individual specimens to be p~eserved in place to
establishing a physical boundary around an area to be protected
from encroachment.
With the speci[ic Natural Communities identified for restoration,
a list of plant species required to augment a marginal habitat,
establish anew habitatOr maintain a new habitat will be prepared.
The number of plants on an acre or square foot basis required..for
the success of each habitat will also be given. And based on these
numbers, an estimate of plant material costs will be prepared-
Local nursery stock will be the basis fort his estimate. Finally,
appropriate components of the Restoration Plan will be graphically
shown on one o= more plan maps.
Meetings
It is anticipated that attendanGe at four (4) meetings with the
City of Temecula and its pro~ect committee, the Cali[ornta
Department of Fish and Game and J- F. David~on and Associates will
be required during the course of the work program- Required
attendance at additional.meetings will be billed at $200.00 per
meeting.
George E. Prine, Jr.
J. F. DAVIDSON ASSOCIATES, INC.
April 14, 1994
Page 4
General
In terms of scheduling, the Biological Impact Report and
Restoration Plan will take [ourteen (14) weeks to complete. [ield
surveys will consume approximately six (6) weeks, due to Seneitlve
Species study requirements, with the remainder of the Biological
Impact Report completed' in an additional two (2) weeks. The
remaining six (6) weeks of the work program will be devoted to
preparing the Restoration Plan, with time allotted for agency input
and review.
At the completion of the work program and upon final payment to
principe and Associates by J- F. Davidson and Associates, ten (10)
bound copies o[ the Biological Impact Report and Restoration Plan
will be delivered to J- [- Davidson and Associates for
distribution-
Not included in this Scope of Work and Cost proposal are additional
items not described herein, alternative restoration plans, tagging
specimens, establishing protected zones, nor any operations or
revegetation monitoring that may be requested of the Consulting
Biologist. These items will be covered in a separate agreement or
agreements-
The Cost proposal prepared for this project is enclosed. The not-
to-exceed total price includes all professional Time fees and
Associated Expenses that will be incurred in the preparation o[ the
Biological Impact Report and Restoration Plan, and thereafter
during. the response~ to comments period until the Report and plan
are found to be complete and adequate by the city of Temecula.
Thank you for your attention to the above-mentioned matters- If
you have anyquestions, please call me at (909) 677-9514- Work can
begin immediately after we enter into a standard professional
Services Agreement (or sub-contractor's agreement)-
Sincerely,
pRINCIPEAND ASSOCIATES
Paul A. Principe
principal
PAP/bp
Enclosure
JF]~ ONTARXO 909944~"F61 ...... P.~5'
13RINCIPE~ND~80~
CONSULTING BIOLOGISTS
39445 Avenida Bizaro
Murrieta, California 92562
(909) 677-9514
COST PROPOSAL
J. F. DAVIDSON ASSOCIATES, INC. Date: April 1994
Temecula Valley Regional Office Proposal NO.: DESILT-1
27349 Jefferson Avenue, Suite 115
Temecula, Californla 92590
Project: City of Temecula Sports Park Lake Desiltation Project
Biological Impact Report and Restoration Plan
professional Services Rendered:
Professional Time
Baseline Biological Data Gathering
Plant and Animal Field Surveys (General)
Focused Sensitive Species Studies
Lake Studies
Results
Biological Resources Mapping
Impact Evaluation (General)
Impacts to Sensitive Species
Mitigation Measures (General)
Restoration Planning
Identification of Natural Communities
Silt Removal and Revegetation Recommendations
Listtng byNumber of Plant Species by Habitat
Estimate of plant'Materials Cost.
Plan Mapping
Meetings (4)
Subtotal
800.00
1,600.00
800.00
800.00
800.00
400.00
800.00
400.00
400.00
400.00
1,600.00
.1,200.00
800.00
800.00
$11.600-00
Associated EXpenses
Travel
Word Processing
Reprographics (10 bound reports)
Subtotal
100.00
200.00
100.00
$ 400.0Q
TOTAL AMOUNT OF THIS COST PROPOSAL
AMENDMENT NO. 01 TO CONTRACT ORDER NO. 15225
Rancho California Deailtation Lake Improvement Project
May 16. 1994
The Agreement dated February 8. 1994 between the City of Temecula and J.F.
Davidson Associates. Inc., (hereinafter referred to as "Agreement"), is hereby
amended as follows:
Re: ADDITIONAL SERVICES
Section 1
Scope of Work is hereby amended to include additional services as described in
Exhibit "A" (attached).
Compensation for these additional services is a not to exceed $12,000 to be paid in
one (1) lump sum following completion of said service.
Section 2
All other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain the same.
The parties hereto have executed this Amendment on the date and year above
written.
CONSULTANT
By: By:
CITY OF TEMECULA
Ron Roberts, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
ATTEST:
June S.-Greek, City Clerk
v:amendbio.jfd 061394
JFD OHTARXO 9899447761 P,82
Exhibit "A"
pRIBCXPE/~WD~SSOCIA~'E-~
CONSULTING BIOLOGISTS
39445 Ivanida Bizaro
Hurrie~, California 92562
(909) 677-9514
April 14, 1994
George X. 1>fine, Jr.
office Manager
Principal Engineer
J. F. DAVYDSONASSOCIATES~ I~C.
Temecula Valley Regional Office
27349 Jefferson Avenue
Suite 115
Temecula, california 92590
Subject:
City of Temecula
Sports Park.
Lake Desiltation Project
Biological Impact Report and
Restoration Plan
Dear George,
Thank you for selecting Principe and Associates to prepare the
Biological Impact Report and Restoration Plan for the City's Lake
Desiltation Project. I did contact the California Department of
Fish and Game for their concerns over the proposed project, and
they concur with the following Scqpe of work:
BaselAne Data Biological Gathering
Consultation will be made with others, 'existing Biological Impact
Reports submitted to the city and County for projects located in
the immediatQ vicinity of the subject site and previously prepared
Environmental'Impact Reports, scientific studies, technical reports
and bulletins, reference books, and etc. The U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service's Federal Register, the California Department of
Fish and Uame's Natural Diversity Data Base Species/CommunitY
Location SummaryReports (Bachelor Mountain, Pechanga and Temecula,
california Quadrangles) and the City of Temecula General Plan
Environmental Impact Report (Tables 9, 10 and 11) will be consulted
during the preparation of this report for a listing of the Federal
and State Sensitive Plant and Animal Species and Communities
presumed extant in the general vicinity of the site with the
highest probability of occurring onsite.
~FD OHTRRXO 9e99447761 P,e~
George E. Prine, Jr.
J. F. DAVIDsON ASSOCIATES, INC.
April 14, 1994
Page 2
Sensitive Species are defined as any unique, rare, endangered, or
threatened species. It includes species used to delineate wetlands
and riparian corridors. It includes anY host plants, plant species
used for perching or food plants used by any animals listed as
rare, endangered or threatened. It alsoincludes candidate species
listed byeither State or Federal regulations, or species listed by
the Natural Diversity Data Base for Riverside County.
Plant andAnimal field surveys will be conducted during the months
of April and May 1994. Field work will be undertaken during
morning, afternoon, and evening hours. Transects will be walked
and repeated, and cover the e~tire surface of the site. Field
glasses and stationary, concealed positioninS techniques will be
used to observe wildlife, and careful attention will be paid to
animal sign. All Sensitive Species will be extenslvely searched
for in their natural habitats occurring on the site, including
Federal listed species such as the Slender-horned spineflower
(Endangered), stephens' kangaroo rat (Endangered), the Coastal
California gnatcatcher (Threatened), and Least Bell's vireo
(Endangered)- Field surveys will also be undertaken in and around
the lake environment.
The results of all the field surveys will be presented in a format
that describes each onsite natural community on the basis of its
vegetation and habitat quality- All wildlife observed on the site
will also be described. The onsite occurrence probability/impact
on Sensitive Species will be presented in a separate section-
Biological Resources Mapping
Mapping of the distribution of plant species occurring on the site,
and their relationship to the development proposal will be
undertaken. The most recent map is to be used. Mapping will be
done on fullTsized copies of the Conceptual Plan. The extent of
each plant association or habitat type on the property will be
shown in acrds. If applicable, the exact location of Sensitive
Species, appropriate buffer areas and the boundaries of mitigation
proposals will be shown on the map- Also shown on the map will be
the location of sample points. (if any), transects and any
additional areas surveyed in the vicinity of the project (if
appropriate)-
~F~ ONT~RZO 9e99447761 Poe4
George ~. Prine, Jr-
J. F- DAVIDSON ASSOCIATES, INC-
April 14, 1994
Page 3
Impa~t Evaluation a~dMitigation Measures
All direct and indirect impacts of the proposed project will be
listed, including an evaluation of impacts to threatened, rare,
endangered, or unique species- All feasible mitigation measures
proposed to reduce or eliminate significant impacts will be listed-
Mitigation measures regarding '.the protection of signiTioant
resources will be accompanied by a map.
Restoration Planning
The first step in developing the Restoration Plan will be to
clearly identify the kinds of Natural Communities that will .be
augmented, established or maintained in their existing condition
(i.e., Lakeside Woodland, Streamside Riparian, Coastal Scrub,
etc.). Because the earth moving activities required to remove the
silt from the lake involves the use of heavy equipment, a
construction zone will be established in an area of the site where
a minimum of impact on existing biological resources will occur.
Similar zones will also be established in areas where revegetation
activities will take place- Construction zones can vary from a
simple tagging of individual specimens to be preserved in place to
establishing a physical boundary around an area to be protected
from encroachment.
With the specific Natural Communities identified for restoration,
a list of plant species required to augment a marginal habitat,
establish a new habitat or maintain a new habitat will be prepared.
The number of plants on an acre or square foot basis required for
the success of each habitat will also be given- And based on these
numbers, an estimate of plant material costs will be prepared.
Local nursery stock will be the basis for this estimate. Finally,
appropriate components of the Restoration Plan will be graphically
shown on one or more plan maps.
Meetings
It is anticipated that attendance at four (4) meetings with the
City of Temecula and its project committee, the California
Department of Fish and Game and J. F- Davidson and Associates will
be required during the course of the work program. Required
attendance at additional. meetings will be billed at $200.00 per
meeting.
JF~ ONT~RXO 9~9944776X P.~6
George E. Prime, Jr.
J. F. DAVIDSON ASSOCIATES, INC.
April 14, 1994
Page 4
General
In terms of scheduling, the Biological Impact Report and
Restoration Plan will take £ourteen (14) weeks to complete. Field
surveys will consume approximately six (6) weeks, due to Sensitive
Species study requirements, with the remainder of the Biological
Impact Report completed' in an additional two (2) weeks. The
remaining six (6) weeks of the work program will be devoted to
preparing the Restoration Plan, ~ith time allotted for agency input
and review.
At the completion of the ~ork program and upon final payment to
princlpe and Associates by J. P- Davidson and Associates, ten (10)
bound copies of the Biological Impact Report and Restoration Plan
will be delivered to J- F. Davidson and Associates for
distribution-
Not included in this Scope of Work and Cost proposal are additional
items not described herein, alternative restoration plane, tagging
specimens, establishing protected zones, nor any operations or
revegetation monitoring that may be requested of the Consultihg
Biologist. These items will be covered in a separate agreement or
agreements.
The Cost Proposal prepared for this project is enclosed. The not-
to-exceed total price includes all professional Time fees and
Associated Expenses that will be incurred in the preparation of the
Biological Impact Report and Restoration Plan, and thereafter
during the responses to comments ~erlod until the Report and plan
are found to be complete and adequate by the City of Temeoula.
Than~ you for your attention to the above-mentiOned matters.
you have any questions, please call me at (909) 677-9514- Work can
begin immediately after we enter into a standard professional
Services Agreement (or sub-contractor's agreement).
Sincerely,
pRiNCIpEANDASSOCIATES
Paul A. Principe
principal
PAP/bp
Enclosure
JF~ ONTARIO 9899447761 P,O5
CONS~/~Z~G BIOI~GI~q~
39445 Avertida Bizaro
Rul-~ieta, Callfoz~ia 92563
(909) 677-9514
COST PROPO-q~T.
J. F- DAVIDSON ASSOCIATES, INC.
Temecula Valley Regional Office
27349 Jefferson Avenue, Suite 115
Temecula, Californla 92590
Date: April 1994
Proposal NO.: DESILT-1
Project:
City of Temecula sports Park Lake Desiltation Project
Biological Impact Report and Restoration Plan
professional Services Rendered:
professional Time
Baseline Biological Data Gathering
Plant and Animal Field Surveys (General)
Focused Sensitive Species Studies
Lake Studies
Results
BIOlogical Resources Mapping
Impact Evaluation (General)
Impacts to Sensitive Species
Mitigation Measures (General)
Restoration Planning
Identification of Natural Communities
Silt Removal and Revegetatiun Recommendations
Listing by Number of Plant Species by Habitat
Estimate of Plant Materials Cost.
Plan Mapping
Meetings (4)
Subtotal
$ 800.00
1,600.00
800.00
800.00
800.00
400.00
800.00
400.00
4OO.00
400.00
1,600.00
lf200.00
800.00
800.OO
$11.600-00
Associated E~enses
Travel
Word Processing
Reprographics (10 bound reports)
Subtotal
100.00
200.00
100.00
$ 400.0Q
TOTAL AMOUNT OF THIS COST PROPOSAL $12~000-00
ITEM
NO.
7
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council.
Mary Jane McLarney, Finance Officer
June 14, 1994
Authorization to Appropriate Funds Within the Insurance Internal Service
Fund
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the appropriation of funds as follows:
Account No.
300-199-999-5204
300-199-999-5205
300-199-999-5207
300-199-999-5250
Account Descriotion
Property Insurance
Claims Examiner
Claims
Other Outside Services
Reouested Appropriation
$ 5,000
$ 6,500
$69,000
$ 2,300
DISCUSSION: Each year, in conjunction with the preparation of the fiscal year budget,
the City Council approves a transfer of $100,000 from the General Fund to the Insurance
Internal Service Fund. 'The funds are then appropriated as needed for insurance operating
purposes.
The request to now appropriate the funds is due to increased costs, as well as an influx of
claims and litigation activity, including Lake Villages, Modaffare, and Wise. As a result,
additional appropriations are needed in the above expenditure accounts.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Any unused portion of the transferred funds will be retained in reserves.
R: tNOR TONL IAGENDA SIINSISF. A GN 6/7/94
ITEM
NO.
8
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICEF
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Council/City Manager
FROM: /1'12-~ Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
DATE: June 14, 1994
SUBJECT: Contract Change Order Nos. 12 through 14 for the Liefer Road Bridge
and Street Improvements, Project No. PW93-02
PREPARED BY: C/Raymond A. Casey, Principal Engineer d:~Jim D. Faul, Assistant Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council:
1. Approve the final Contract Change Orders Nos. 12 through No. 14 for Liefer Road Bridge
and Street Improvements Project, PW93-02, pertaining to labor and equipment for various
items of work, in the amount of $16,655.40.
2. Approve an advance from the Development Impact Fund of $2,450.96 to the Capital
Projects Fund.
BACKGROUND:
During the construction of the Liefer Road Bridge and Street Improvements Project the
following items of work have resulted in a change to the contract. The Contract Change
Orders are as follows:
CHANGE ORDER NO.'12 - Install Additional Water Main Appurtenances: (Billed to RCWD)
When the relocated water main (Item #19) was .being constructed, Rancho California Water
District (RCWD) requested the Contractor to ins'tall additional concrete thrust blocks and to
repair an existing PVC coupling restraint. The City will invoice RCWD for this change order.
SUBTOTAL: $1,959.50
r%agdrpt%94%0614~pw93-02.acc
CHANGE ORDER NO. 13 - Extend Contract Unit Quantities for Bid Item Nos. 4,5,12, 15, & 17: -
Provide additional unit quantities, at Contract Unit Price, to reflect actual ~luantities obtained
in the field that exceeded the Engineer's estimate. The additional quantities included asphalt
concrete (Item #4), crushed aggregate base (Item #5), abutments/wingwalls concrete (Item
#12), A.C. overside drain (Item #15), and earthwork (Item #21 ). The California Department
of Fish and Game required additional hydroseeding (Item #17) due to the construction in and
near the Santa Gertrudis Creek.
SUBTOTAL: $14,351.90
CHANGE ORDER NO. 14 - Removel of Asphalt Debris:
Asphalt debris, located on the surface, was encountered within the construction limits of the
project. The Contractor will collect and remove the asphalt debris from the site.
SUBTOTAL: $344.00
TOTAL: $16,655.40
FISCAL IMPACT:
On November 9, 1993,the City Council awarded a contract for the construction of Liefer Road
Bridge and Street Improvements, to K.E. Patterson Company. LTD. for $167,475.00. Change
Order Nos. 01 through 11 were previously approved in the total amount of $29,858.35 of
which $9,247.48 should be reimbursed by RCWD. Contract Change Order Nos. 12 through
14 are in the amount of $16,655.50 of which $1,959.50 should be reimbursed by RCWD.
An additional $2,450.96 must be advanced for the Liefer Road Bridge and Street
Improvements Project at this time (the difference between the total of these change orders and
the reimbursement amount recently received from Rancho California Water District). Adequate
appropriations are available in account number 210-166-627-5804. This project is up to
93.75% reimbursable by the Federal Emergency Management Agency and the State of
California Office of Emergency Services per Damage Survey Report Number 97284.' The
remaining cost should be reimbursed to the City through a future assessment district for
improvements to Liefer Road.
'Attachments:
Contract Change Orders Nos. 12 through 14
r~agdrpt%94~,0614%pw93-O2.acc
CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 1:2
CONTRACT NO. PW93-02
PROJECT:
LIEFER ROAD BRIDGE & STREET IMPROVEMENTS
SHEET I of 1_]_
TO CONTRACTOR: K.E. Patterson Co.. Inc.
NOTE:
This change order is not effective until aooroved by the Enaineer.
CHANGE REQUESTED BY: Jim D. Faul, Assistant Engineer - Land Development
A. EXTRA WORK (8) AGREED PRICE
ITEM
AMOUNT
Chanae Order No. 12 - Install Additional Water Main Aoourtenances: (Billed to RCWD)
When the relocated water main(Item #19) was being constructed, Rancho California Water
District (RCWD) requested the Contractor to install additional concrete thrust blocks and to
repair an existing PVC coupling restraint. The City will invoice RCWD for this change order.
Total: $1,959.50
Original Contract Amount .............................. $ 167,475.00
Adjusted Contract Amount ............................. $ 197,333.50
Change Order No. 12 ................................. $ 1,959.50
Total Contract Amount ................................ $ 199,293.00
Adjustment of Working Days .......................... N/A
Approved: Principal Engr. By: Date:
We the undersigned contractor have given careful consideration to the change proposed and hereby
agree. If this proposal is approved, that we will provide all equipment, furnish all materials, except
as may otherwise be noted above, and perform all services necessary for the work above specified,
and will accept as full payment therefore the prices shown above.
Date Accepted: Contractor:
By: Title:
(company's name)
'(signature)
Name:
(print)
If the contractor does not sign acceptance of this order, his attention is directed to the requirements
of the specifications as to proceeding with the ordered work and filing a written protest within the
time therein specified.
c%fauNiefer%cco~,cco. 12
CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO.
CONTRACT NO. PW93-b,
PROJECT:
LIEFER ROAD BRIDGE & STREET IMPROVEMENTS
SHEET _.1_ of __1
TO CONTRACTOR: K.E. Patterson Co., Inc.
NOTE:
This change order is not effective until aDoroved bv the Engineer.
CHANGE REQUESTED BY: Jim D. Faul, Assistant Engineer - Land Development
Ae
EXTRA WORK (E) AGREED PRICF
ITEM
AMOUNT
Chanqe Order No. 13 - Extend Contract Unit Quantities for Bid Item Nos. 4,5,12,15, & 17:
Provide additional unit quantities, at Contract Unit Price, to reflect actual quantities obtained
in the field that exceeded the Engineer's estimate. The additional quantities included asphalt
concrete (Item #4), crushed aggregate base (Item #5), abutments/wingwalls concrete (Item
#12), A.C. overside drain (Item #15), and earthwork (Item #21 ). The California Department
of Fish and Game required additional hydroseeding (Item #17) due to the construction in and
near the Santa Gertrudis Creek.
Total: $ 14,351.
Original Contract Amount .............................. $ 167,475.00
Adjusted Contract Amount ............................. $ 199,293.00
Change Order No. 13 ................................. ~ 14,351.90
Total Contract Amount ................................. $ 213,644.90
Adjustment of Working Days .......................... N/A
Approved: Principal .Engr. By: Date:
We the undersigned contractor have given careful consideration to the change proposed and hereby
agree. If this proposal is approved, that we will provide all equipment, furnish all materials, except
as may otherwise be noted above, and perform all services necessary for the work above specified,
and will accept as full payment therefore the prices shown above.
Date Accepted: Contractor:
(company's name)
By: Ti.tle:
(signature)
Name:
(print)
If the contractor does not sign acceptance of this order, his attention is directed to the requirement~-
of the specifications as to proceeding with the ordered work and filing a written protest within tl
time therein specified.
r:%fauNiefe~cco%coo. 13 skg
CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 14
CONTRACT NO. PW93-02
PROJECT: LIEFER ROAD BRIDGE &STREET IMPROVEMENTS
TO CONTRACTOR: K.E. Patterson Co., Inc,
NOTE: This change order is not effective until aDoroved by the Engineer.
CHANGE REQUESTED BY: Jim D. Faul, Assistant Engineer - Land Development
A. EXTRA WORK (~ AGREED PRICE
SHEET 1_]_ of 1__
ITEM -- AMOUNT
ChanGe Order No. 14- Removal of Asohalt Debris:
Asphalt debris, located on the surface, was encountered within the construction limits of the
project. The Contractor will collect and remove the asphalt debris from the site.
Total: $ 344.00
Original Contract Amount .............................. $ 167,475.00
Adjusted Contract Amount ............................. $ 213,644.90
Change Order No. 14 ................................. $ 344.00
Total Contract Amount ................................ $ 213,988.90
Adjustment of Working Days .......................... N/A
Approved: Principal Engr. By: Date:
We the undersigned contractor have given careful consideration to the change proposed and hereby
agree. If this proposal is approved, that we will .provide all equipment, furnish all materials, except
· as may otherwise be noted above, and perform all services necessary for the work above specified,
and will accept as full payment therefore the prices shown above.
Date Accepted: Contractor:
(company's name)
By: Title:
(signart]re)
Name:
(print) '
If the contractor does not sign acceptance of this order, his attention is directed to the requirements
of the specifications as to proceeding with the ordered work and filing a written protest within the
time therein specified.
r,\feul%liefer%cco\cco. 14
ITEM NO.
9
APPROV~T.
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
June 14, 1994
Substitute Subdivision Improvement Agreement
Improvement Bond Riders in Tract No. 2291 6-F
and Public
PREPARED BY: ~,~/Albert Crisp, Permit Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council ACCEPT the Substitute Subdivision Improvement Agreement and riders
to Faithful Performance and Labor and Material Bonds for Street, Water, and Sewer
Improvements, and Subdivision Monumentation Bond Rider in Tract No. 22916-F, and DIRECT
the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and the Surety·
BACKGROUND:
On September 18, 1990, the City Council approved Tract Map No.22916-F, and entered into
subdivision agreements with:
Tayco (Joint' Venture of TaylOr Woodrow Homes & Costain Homes, Inc.)
4921 Birch Street, Suite 110
Newport Beach, CA 92660
for the improvement of streets, installation of sewer and water systems, and subdivision
monumentation. Accompanying the subdivision agreements were surety bonds issued by
American Home Assurance Company as follows:
Bond No. PB 300 12 678 in the amount of $1,095,000to cover street improvements.
Bond No. PB 300 12 678 in the amount of $86,500 to cover water improvements.
3. Bond No. PB 300 12 678 in the amount of $115,500 to cover sewer improvements.
Bond No. PB 300 12 678 in the amount of $648,500 to cover material and labor for
street, water, and sewer improvements.
r:~egdrpt~94~0614~tr22916-F 0602/ao
5. Bond No. PB '300 13 185 in the amount of $22,686 to cover subdivision
monumentation.
Effective December 31, 1993, Costain Homes Inc. withdrew from the joint venture
partnership. The name of the new partnership is Tayco, a California General Partnership
(comprised of Taylor Woodrow Homes California Limited, a California Corporation, and Taylor
Woodrow Real Estate, · California Corporation). A new agreement has been executed by the
partnership and riders to the Bonds in the full amount submitted for City Council acceptance.
The Surety remains the same. The riders reflect the change in principal.
The affected streets, although not completed or accepted, are Camino Seneco, Corte Bacarro,
and Via Torres, and a portion of Meadows Parkway, Pauba Road, and Corte Parado.
Attachment:
Location Map
Riders to Faithful Performance Bonds
Substitute Agreement
r:~agdrpt~94~O614%tr22916-F 0602/ac
P;OJECT
SITE
Nor ?.oF sc,~ a_~
· ,:T/'51 ' 5-~ i[..Z..,~°
:v.'. .:3. ~ . ·® ,
CAI~HELA
LOT '~
pAUDA
TRACT NO.
22916 -F
Location Map
ITEM ... N O. 10
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
June 14, 1994
Final Parcel Map No. 25538 - Southeastern Terminus of Estero Street
PREPARED BY:~Raymond A. Casey, Principal Engineer - Land Development
~)~Annie Bostre-Le, Engineer Technician - Land Development
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council approve Final Parcel Map No. 25538 subject to the Conditions of
Approval.
BACKGROUND:
Tentative Parcel Map No. 25538, Amendment No. I was approved by the City of Temecula
Planning Director on February 18, 1993. The Developer has met all of the Conditions of
Approval.
Final Parcel Map No. 25538 is a proposed two (2) lot residential subdivision of 1.43 gross
acres located at the southeastern terminus of Estero Street. The site currently is vacant.
Surrounding land use is single family development. The site is zoned Rural Residential (R-R).
The established zoning on the property conforms with the land use designation on the General
Plan for the City of Temecula.
The following fees have been paid for Final P.M. 25538:
Area Drainage Fee
Traffic Signal Mitigation Fee
Fire Mitigation Fee
$1,576.00
$ 300.00
$ 800.00
f:.%agdrpt%94%0614~m25538.agn/ajp
The following fees have been deferred for Final Parcel Map No. 25538:
Area Drainage Fee (Balance of $1,182.00)
Stephen's K-Rat Mitigation Fee
Public Facilities Fee
Due prior to grading permit
Due prior to grading permit
Due prior to building permit
The following bond has been posted for Final Parcel Map No. 25538.
Subdivision Warranty Bond
4,650.00
The public improvements associated with this parcel map were constructed prior to map
recordation under Parcel Map 24633, therefore construction bonds are not required.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
ATTACHMENTS:
2.
3.
4.
5.
Development Fee Checklist
Project Location Map
Sheet 2 of Final Parcel Map No. 25538
Conditions of Approval
Fees & Securities Report
r.~agd~t~,94%0614~m25638.agnlejp
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEVELOPMENT FEE CHECKLIST
Final Vesting Parcel Map No. 25538
The following fees were reviewed by Staff relative to their applicability to this project.
FEE
Habitat Conservation Plan
(K-Rat)
Traffic Signal Mitigation
Fire Mitigation
Flood Control
(ADP)
Public Facility
(1) Original Conditions of Approval
(2) Conditions of Approval, Amendment No. 1
CONDITION OF APPROVAL
Condition No. 16
C.O.A. dated 10/15/90 (1)
Condition No. 25
C.O.A. dated 10/15/90 (1)
Condition No. 11
C.O.A. dated 10/15/90 ( 1 )
Condition No. 24
C.O.A. dated 2/18/93 (2)
Condition No. 40
C.O.A. dated 2/18/93 (2)
r.\agdrpt\94%0614\pm25538.agn/ajp
SANTIAGO
SL TA-t~ t° R t~
~A
C:~I~NTA ESTERO STREET
VERDE
ROAD
2~,/ALTER
o
o ROAD
PARCEL MAP NO. 25538 --
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
CrTY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Tentative Parcel Map No. No. 25538, Amendment
No. 1
Project Description: One year extension of time
for Tentative Parcel Map No. 25538, Amendment
No. I .- a two (2| parcel residential subdivision of
a 1.43 acre parcel
ASsessor's Parcel No.: 945-070-010
Approval Date: February 18, 1993
Expiration Date: October 16, 1993
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
The tentative subdivision shall comply with the State of California' Subdivision Map Act
and to all the requirements of Ordinance No. 460, unless modified by the conditions
listed below. A time extension may be approved in accordance with the State Map
Act and City Ordinance, upon written request, if made 30 ~lays prior to the expiration
date·
e
The subdivider shall defend, indemnify; and'hold harmless the City of Temecula, it
agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City
of Temecula, its advisory agencies, appeal boards or legislative body concerning
Tentative Parcel Map No. 25538, Amendment No. 1, First Extension of Time, which
action is brought within the time period provided for in California Government Code
Section 66499.37. The City of Teme~ula will promptly notify the subdivider of any
such claim, action, or prbceeding against the City of Temecula and will cooperate fully
in the defense· If the City fails to promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim,
action, or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the subdivider shall not,
thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City of Temecula.
Tentative Parcel Map No. 25538, Amendment No. 1, First Extension of Time shall
comply with all Conditions of Approval for Tentative Parcel Map No. 25538,
Amendment No. 1 unless superseded by these Conditions of Approval.
PRIOR
4.
TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS
A Mitigation Monitoring Program shall be submitted and approved by the Planning
Director.
5. A copy of the Rough Grading plans shall be submitted.
A qualified paleontologist shall be chosen by the developer for consultation and
comment on the proposed grading with respect to potential paleontological impacts.
Should the paleontologist find potential is high for impact to significant resources, a
pre-grade meeting between the paleontologist, Planning Director staff and the
excavation and grading contractor shall be arranged. Mitigation measures shall be
R:~S~ST~31.OOA 2f'Z3/93
approved by the Planning Director along with a Mitigation Monitoring Program. When
necessary, the paleontologist or representative shall have the authority to temporarily
divert, redirect or halt grading activity to allow recovery of fossils.
The applicant shall demonstrate by submittal of a written report that all mitigation
measures identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Program have been satisfied for this
stage of development.
PRIOR TO RECORDATION OF THE FINAL MAP ·
The following Shall be submitted tO and approved by the Planning Director.:
a. A copy of the Final Map
A copy of the Environmental ConStraint Sheet (ECS)
i.
The following notes shall be added to the Environmental Constraint
Sheet (ECS):
(1)
This property is located within thirty (30) miles of Mount Palomar
Observatory. All proposed outdoor lighting systems shall comply
with the California Institute of Technology, Palomar Observatory
recommendations. ·
9. The applicant shall demonstrate by submittal of a written report that all mitigation
measures identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Program have been satisfied for this
stage of development.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS
10.
The following shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Director:
a. Precise Grading Plans consistent with the approved Rough Grading Plans which
include the following:
i. '"' All' structural setback measurements
ii. - - Building elevations
11.
12.
Roof-mounted mechanical equipment shall not be permitted within the residential
portion of the subdivision, however solar equipment or any other energy saving devices
shall be permitted with Planning Director approval. Roof-mounted equipment may be
allowed for commercial structures if they are architecturally screened from view from
the adjoining streets and properties. .
The applicant shall demonstrate by submittal of a written report that all mitigation
measures identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Program have been satisfied for this
stage of development.
R:~LqTA~53g. COA 2/23/93 tjs
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
The following are additional Conditions of Approval of the Department of Public Works for this
project, and shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All previous
Conditions of Approval shall remain in force except as amended or superseded by the
following requirements. All questions regarding the true meaning of the. conditions shall be
referred to the appropriate staff person of the Department of Public Works.
It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the durrent tentative map or site pla~
all existing and 'proposed easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage
courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and
revision. .. .-:
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS :
13. A Grading Permit for either rough or precise (including all-onsite flat work and
improvements) construction shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works
prior to commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained road right-
of-way,
14. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior
to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City
right-of-way. "
15. All improvement .plans, grading plans, landscape and irrigation plans shall be
coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements
contiguous to the site.
16. Pursuant to Section 66493 of the Subdivision Map Act, any subdivision which is part
of an existing Assessment District must C~omply with the requirements of said section.
PRIOR
17.
18.
19..
TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS '
-The final grading pl'an shall be prepared by'a RegiStered Civil Engineer and shall be
reviewed and approved-by the Department of Public Works.
All lot drainage shall be directed to the driveway by side yard drainage swales
independent of any other lot.
Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board.
No grading shall be permitted until an NPDES. Notice of Intent has been filed or the
project is shown to be exempt.
R:~.S~ST~3~.COA 2/23/93
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
The developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies:
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
San Diego Regional Water Quality;
Riverside County Rood Control District;
Planning Department;
Department of Public Works;
Riverside County Health Department;
General Telephone;
Southern California Edison Company; and
Southern California Gas Company.
A Soils Report shall be prepared by a registered soils engineer and submitted to the
Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The-report shall
address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the
construction of engineered structures and 'pavement sections.
An erosion-control plan shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer and submitted
to the Department of Public Works for review and approval.
Graded but undeveloped land shall be maintained in a weedfree condition and shall be
either planted with interim landscaping or provided with other erosion control measures
as approved by the Department of Public Works.
A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge ~hall equal the prevailing Area
Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new development. The charge is
payable to the Flood Control District prior to issuance of permits. If the full Area
Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has been already credited to this property, no
new charge needs to be paid.
The developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or easements for any.
offsite work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public '
Works.
The subdividi~r shall accept and properly dispose of .all off-site drainage flowing Onto ·
or through the site. In the event the Department of Public Works permits the use of'
streets for drainage purposes, the provisions of Section XI-of Ordinance No. 460 will'
apply. Should the quantities exceed the street capacity, or use of streets be prohibited
for drainage purposes, the subdivider shall provide adequate facilities as approved by
the Department of Public Works.
The subdivider shall protect downstream properties from damages ~:aused by alteration
of the drainage patterns; i.e., concentration or diversion of flow. Protection shall be
provided by constructing adequate'drainage facilities, including enlarging existing
facilities or.by securing a drainage easement,.
A drainage easement shall be obtained from the affectted property owners for the
release of concentrated or diverted storm flows onto the adjacent property. A copy
of the drainage easement shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for
review prior to recordation. The location of the recorded easement shall be delineated
on the grading plan.
R:~TAFIrR.F'~2SS~g-COA 2/23.n)3 tin
PRIOR
29.
TO THE ISSUANCE OF ENCROACHMENT PERMITS
All necessary grading permit requirements shall have been completed an~! approved to
the satisfaction. of the Department of Public Works.
30.
-The following criteria shall be observed in the design of the improvement plans to be
'submitted to the Department of Public Works:
ae
Flowlin. e grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over
A.C. paving. "--. ':
Street lights shall be installed :along the public streets adjoining the site in
accordance with Ordinance 461 and shall be shown on the improvement plans
as directed by the Department of Public Works.
All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees or as
approved by the Department of Public Works.
ds
Landscaping shall be limited in the comer cut-off area of all intersections and
adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility.
All concentrated drainage directed towards the public street shall be conveyed
through undersidewalk drains.
31.
All driveways shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula standards and shall be
shown on the street improvement plans in accordance with City Standard 207 and
208.
32. All driveways shall be located a minimum:of two (2) feet from the side property line.
33.
All utility systems including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer, and cable TV shall
be provided for underground, with easements provided as required, and designed and
constructed in accordance with City Codes and the utility provider. Telephone, cable
TV, and/or security systems shall be pre-wired in the residence.
34. All utilities, except electrical lines rated 33kv or greater, shall be installed underground.
PRIOR TO RECORDATION OF FINAL MAP
35.
36.
An aooosc-, c,a~omont 20 fcot in width along thc wcstorly boundary line of Faroel I shall
be reserved in favor of the northerly portion of pareel I of Pereel Map 13888, PM Deok
.10'I/10 11. (Deleted at Planning Director'a Hearing on February 11, 1993).
The developer shall comply with all c~nstraints which may
Environmental Constraint Sheet recorded with any underlying
subject property.
be shown upon an
maps related to the
37.
Prior to recording the final map, the subdivider shall notify the City's CATV Franchises
of the Intent to Develop. Conduit shall be installed to CATV Standards at time of
street improvements.
R:~SL.~TAFFRP"r~53S.COA 2/23/93 tjs
PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT
38.
A precise grading plan shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review
and approval. The building pad shall be certified by a registered Civil Engineer for
location and elevation, and the Soils Engineer shall issue a Final Soils Report addressing
compaction and site conditions.
39.
40.
Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code,
the approved grading plan, the conditions of the grading permit, C{ty Grading
S~andards and accepted grading construction practices. The final grading plan shall
be in substantial conformance with the. approved rough grading plan.
Developer shall pay any capital.fee for road improvements and public facilities imposed
upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public facility mitigation as
required under the EIR/Negative Declaration for the project. The fee to be paid shall
be in the amount in effect at the time of payment of the fee. If an interim or final
public facility mitigation fee or district has not. been finally established by the date on
which developer requests its building permits for the project or any phase thereof, the
developer shall execute the Agreement for payment of Public Facility fee, a copy of
which has been provided to developer. Concurrently, with executing this Agreement,
developer shall post a bond to secure payment of the Public Facility fee. The amount
of the bond shall be $2.00 per square foot, not to exceed 910,000. Developer
understands that said Agreement may require the' payment of fees in excess of those
now estimated (assuming benefit to the project in the amount of such fees). By
execution of this Agreement, developer will waive any right to protest the Provisions
of this Condition, of this Agreement, the formation of any traffic impact fee district,
or the process, levy, or collection of any traffic mitigation or traffic impact fee for this
project; provided that developer is not waiving its right to protest the reasonableness
of any traffic impact fee, and the amount thereof.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY
4!. All improvements shall be completed and in place per the approved plans, including but
not |imited to, curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, drai.nage
· facilities~-parkway trees and street lights on all interior public streets.
42. Landscaping installed in the corner cut-off area of all intersection and adjacent to
driveways shall be reviewed and approved in the field for minimum sight distance as'
directed by the Department of Public Works.
43. Asphaltic emulsion (fog seal) shall be applied only as directed by the Department of
Public Works at a rate of 0.05 gallon per square yard. Asphalt emulsion shall conform
to Section Nos. 37, 39, and 94 of the State Standard Specifications.
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
44.
Upon the request of a building permit for construction of residential structures on one
or more of the parcels within four years following approval of tentative map, parcel
map, or planned development, real estate development, stock cooperative, community
apartment project and condominium for which a tentative map or parcel map is filed,
a predetermined Quimby Act Fee in the amount equal to the fair market value of
R:~q~'TA~53g. COA 2.q.3/93 ~s
required acreage shall be paid by the owner of each such parcel(s) as a condition to
the issuance of such permit as authorized by City Ordinance No. 460.93.
OTHER AGENCIES
45. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Rancho California
Water District transmittal dated September'29, 1992, a copy of which is attached.
R:~L~T~535.COA 2/'Z2/93 tjs
hnch0
Wmr
John F. Hennigar
C, tt~ral Managtr
Phillip L Forb~
Dirt~or of Finann-
Tr~asurtr
F, P. 'Bob' Ltmon9
Dirtt~r oF En~n,trmg
Kenntth C. Dtaly
Dirte~r o~ (~ratmna
& .Mainttnanct
Perry R. Louck
Controller
Linda M. Frtgo~o
MeCormiel~ Kidman
& Behrtns
Legal Counsel
September 29, 1992
· Mr. Matthew Fagan
City of Temecula
Planning Department
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
Water Availability
Parcel Map 25538
First Extension of Time
RECEIVED
OCT 0 1,1992
.......... -.,
Dear Mr. Fagan:
Please be advised that the above-referenced property is located within the
boundaries of Rancho California Water District CRCWD). Water service,
therefore, would be ava~ablc upon completion of financial arrangements
between RCWD and the property owner.
Water availability would bc contingent upon the property owner signing an
Agency Agreement which assigns water management rights, if any, 'to
RCWD.
If you have any 'queStions, please contact Ms..Senga Doherty.
Sincerely,
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT
Steve Brannon, P. E.
Manager of Development Engineering
0
so:so:aj3oo/F186
Senga Dohcrty, Engineering Technician
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Tentative Parcel Map No. 25538
Council Approval Date:
Expiration Date:
P)anninq Depart;nent
1. The subdivider shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of
Temecula, its agents,' officers, and employees from any claim, action, or
proceeding against the City of Temecula or its agents, officers, or employees
to attack, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the City of Temecula, its
advisory agencies, appeal boards or legislative body concerning Tentative
Parcel Map No. 25538, P.C. No. 1. which action is brought within the time
period provided for in California Government Code Section 66499.37. The City
of Temecula will promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim. action, or
proceeding against the City of Temecula and will cooperate fully in the
defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim,
action, or proceeding or faiis to cooperate fully in the defense, the subdivider
shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless
the City of Temecula.
2. The tentative parcel map shall conform to the requirements of Ordinance 460,
Schedule G unless modified by the conditions listed below. This approved
tentative parcel map will expire two years after the City Council approval date
unless extended as provided by Ordinance 460.
3. , The final map shall be prepared by,a ~'egistered civil engineer or licensed land
surveyor subject to all the requirements of the State of California Subdivision
Map Act, Riverside county Subdivision Ordinance 460.
All road easements shall be offered for dedication to the public and shall
continue in force until the governing body accepts or abandons such offers.
All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the City.
Street names shall be subject to approval of the City of Temecula.
5. Easements, when required for roadway slopes, drainage facilities, utilities.
etc., shall be shown on the final map'if within the land division boundary. All
offers of dedication shall provide for nonexclusive public road and utility
access. All easements, offers of dedication and conveyances shall be
submitted and recorded as directed by the City of Temecula.
6. Lagal access as required by Ordinance 460 shall be provided from the parcel
map boundary to a City maintained road.
STA FFR PT\PM25538 1
10.
11.
12.
13.
15.
16.
All delinquent property taxes shall be paid prior to recordation of the final
map.
The subdivider shall comply with the .street improvement recommendations
outlined in the County Road Department's letter dated 12-26-89, a copy of
which is attached.
The subdivide shall comply with the environmental health recommendations
outlined in the County Health Department's Transmittal dated 12-8-89, a copy
of which is attached.
The subdiyider shall comply with the flood control recommendations outlined
in the Riverside County Flood Control District~s letter dated 12-13-89, a copy
of which is attached. If the land division lies within an adopted flood control
drainage area pursuant to Section 10.25 of Riverside County Land Division
Ordinance L~60, appropriate fees for the construction of area drainage facilities
shall be collected by the Road Commissioner prior to recordation of the final
map or waiver of parcel map.
The subdivider shall comply with the fire improvement recommendations
outlined in the County Fire Department~s letter dated 12-13-89, a copy of
which is attached.
The subdivider shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Buildin9
and Safety Department: Land Use Sectionts transmittal dated 12-20-89, a copy
of which is attached.
The subdivider shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Building
and Safety Department: Gradin9 Section's transmittal dated 5-1-90, a copy
of which is attached.
The subdivider shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the San
Bernardino County Museum transmittal dated 12-11-89, a copy of which is
attached.
Prior to issuance of building permits, applicant shall be required to pay
applicable Quimby fees in accordance with Section 10.35 of Ordinance/~60.
Prior to the issuance of a gradin9 permit, the applicant shall comply with the
provisions of Ordinance No. 663 by paying the appropriate fee set forth in
that ordinance. Should Ordinance No. 663 be superseded by the provisions
of a Habitat Conservation Plan prior to the payment of the fee required by
Ordinance No. 663, the applicant shall pay the fee required by the Habitat
Conservation Plan as implemented by County ordinance or resolution.
Enqineerinq Department
The following are the Engineering Department Conditions of Approval for this
project, and shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All questions
regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the Engineering
Department.
STAFFRPT\PM25538 2
It is understood that the Developer correctly shows all existing easements, traveled
ways, and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be
resubmitted for further consideration.
17.
The Developer shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act,
and all applicable City. Ordinances and Resolutions.
PRIOR TO FINAL MAP APPROVAL:
18. Prior to final map approval, the deve!oper shall receive written clearance from
the following agencies:
19.
20.
21.
- San Diego Regional Water Quality;
- Rancho California Water District;
- Riverside County Flood Control District;
- City of Temecu)a Fire Bureau;
- Planning Department;
- Engineering Department;
- . Riverside County Health Department; and
- CATV Franchise.
The final map shall be prepared by a licensed land surveyor or registered
Civil Engineer, subject to all the requirements of the State of California
Subdivision Map Act and Ordinance No. 460.
Dedication shall be made to provide for right-d-way for a cui-de-sac per
Riverside County Standard No. 800.
The subdivider shall construct or post security 9uaranteein9 the construction
of the following public improvements in conformance with applicable City
standards.
a. Street i'mprovements, including, but not limited to: pavement, curb
and 9utter, drive approaches, street lights, signing, and striping.
22.
23.
25.
b. A domestic water system.
The subdivider shall provide bonds and agreement, clearances from all
applicable agencies and pay all fees prior to the approval of the final map.
The street design and improvement concept of this project shall be coordinated
with adjoining developments. .
Street lights shall be provided along streets adjoining the subject site in
accordance with the standards of Ordinance No. 461 and as approved by the
City Engineer.
Prior to recordation of the final map, the developer shall deposit with the
Engineering Department a cash sum established per lot as mitigation for a
traffic signal impact.
5TA FF R PT\PM25538 3
26.
27.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
Should the developer choose to defer the time of payment of traffic signal
mitigation fee, he may enter into a written agreement with the City deferring
said payment to the time of issuance of a building permit.
The subdivider shall submit four copies of a soils report to the Engineering
Department. The report shall address the soils stability and geological
conditions of the site.
A copy of the improvement plans, grading plans and final map, along with
supporting hydrologic and hydraulic calculations should be submitted to the
Riverside County Flood Control District for review.
Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be and
an encroachment permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office, in
addition to any other permits required.
Street improvement plans including parkway trees and street lights prepared
by a Registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer shall be
required for all public streets prior to issuance of an encroachment permit.
Final plans and profiles shall show the location of existing utility facilities
within the right-of-way.
All driveways shall be located a minimum of two 12) feet from the property
line.
All driveways shall be constructed along all public street frontages in
accordance with City Standard Nos. 400 and 401 {curb sidewalk).
A minimum centerline grade shall be 0.50 percent.
The required improvements as reflected in the following conditions shall be
completed prior to issuance of Certificates of Occupancy· The improvements
are required based on the following findings:
The improvements are a necessary prerequisite to the orderly
development of the surrounding area.
b. The improvements are necessary for the public health and safety.
Estero Street shall be improved with 28 feet of asphalt concrete pavement
within the dedicated right of way. in accordance with County Standard No.
105, Section B. (36-60), add concrete curb/gutter.
improvement plans shall be based upon a centerline profile extending a
minimum of 300 feet beyond the project boundaries at a grade and alignment
as approved by the City Engineer.
STAFF R PT\PM25538
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY:
37.
Construct full street improvements including but not limited to, curb and
gutter, A.C. pavement, drive approaches, parkway trees and street lights
within parcel map boundary in accordance with Riverside County Standard
No. 800-cul-de-sac.
38.
All street improvements shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer.
39.
Asphaltic emulsion Jfo9 seal) shall be applied not less than 14 days following
placement of the asphalt surfacing.and shall be applied at a rate of 0.05 gallon
per square yard, Asphalt emulsion shall conform to Section Nos. 37, 39, and
94 of the State Standard Specifications.
40.
Prior to Building Permit, the subdivider shall notify the City's CATV
Franchises of the intent to develop. Conduit shall be installed to CATV
Standards prior to issuance of Certificates of Occupancy.
41.
Developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities
imposed upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public
facility mitigation as required under the Negative Declaration for the project,
in the amount in effect at the time of payment of the fee. If an interim or final
public facility mitigation fee or district has not been finally established by the
date on which Developer requests its building permits for the project or any
phase thereof, the Developer shall execute the Agreement for Payment of
Public Facility Fee, a copy of which has been provided to Developer.
Developer understands that said Agreement may require the payment of fees
in excess of those now estimated l assuming benefit to the project in the
amount of such fees) and specifically waives its right to protest such
increase.
5~T A FF R PT\PM25538
5
OFF~uE OF ROAD COMMISSIONER & COUNTY ~URVEYOR
mml~ ~J[' ~ i.rrnii~r ~
ROAD AND R,'R~..V~y
D[PA~T~ ~
[-Roy D. Srnool
ROAD COHHL%SIOH[R & COUNTY
December 26, 1989
ADM~I~Tlt4.~ CT. tfTT, JI
MAILD4G A13(3~:
P.O. BOX IDxM~3
~ ~R.N~ 925432
(714] 717-6554
Riverside County Planning Commission
4080 Lemon Street
Riverside, CA 92501 ,
REz PM 25538"
Schedule G - Team i - SMD #9
AP #111-111-111-9
Ladies and Gentlemen:
With respect to the conditions of approval for the referenced
tentative land division map, the Road Department recommends that the
landdivider provide the following street improvements, street
improvement plans and/or road dedications in accordance with
Ordinance 460 and Riverside County Road Improvement Standards
(Ordinance 461). It is understood that the tentative map correctly
shows acceptable centerline elevations, all existing easements,
traveled ways, and drainage courses with appropriate Q's, and that
their omission or unacceptability may require the map to be
resubmitted for further consideration. These Ordinances and the
following conditions are essential parts and a requirement occurring
in ONE is as binding as though occurring in all. They are intended
to be complementary and to describe the conditions for a complete
design of the improvement. All questions regarding the true-meaning
of the conditions shall be referred to the Road Commissioner's
Office.
The landdivider shall protect downstream properties from
damages caused by alteration of the drainage patterns, i,e.
concentration of diversion of flow. Protection shall be
provided by constructing adequate drainage facilities including
enlarging existing facilities and/or by securing a drainage
easement. All drainage easements shall be shown on the final
map and noted as followsz "Drainage Easement - no building,
obstructions, or encroachments by land fills are allowed". The
pro~ection shall be as approved by the Road Department.
The landdivider shall accept and properly dispose of all
offsite drainage flowing onto or through the site. In the event
the Road Commissioner permits the use of streets for drainage
purposes, the provisions of Article XI of Ordinance No. 460
will apply· Should the quantities exceed the street capacity
or the use of streets be prohibited for drainage purposes, the
subdivider shall provide adequate drainage facilities as
PM ~5538
Decer-ber 26, 1989
Pa~e 2
lO.
11.
12.
The requ]_red improvements as reflected in the following
conditions shall be completed or a Performance Security in
lieu thereof shall be posted in accordance with Riverside
County Ordinance 460, Article XV, prior to recordation of
the final map. The improvements are required based on the
following findings~
a)
b)
The improvements are a necessary prerequisite to the
orderly development of the surrounding area.
The improvements
and safety.
are necessary for the public health
Major drainage is involved on this landdivision and its
resolution shall be as approved by the Road Department.
Estero Street shall be improved with 28 feet of asphalt
concrete pavement within a 40 foot part width dedicated
right of way in accordance with County Standard No. 105,
Section B. ( 18'/30' )
Improvement plans shall be based upon a centerline profile
extending a minimum of 300 feet beyond the project
boundaries at a grade and alignment as approved by the
rhe develeFer/owner shall submit a detailed soils investi-
gation report addressing the construction requirements
within the road right of way.
A standard cul-de-sac shall be constructed throughout the
landdivision.
Aspbaltic emulsion (fog seal) shall be applied not less
than fourteen days following placement of the asphalt
surfacing and shall be applied at a rate of 0.05 gallon per
square yard. Asphalt emulsion shall conform to Section 37,
39 and 94 of the State Standard Specifications.
The landdivider shall provide utility clearance from Rancho
California Water District prior to the recordation of the
final map.
The maximum centerline gradient and the minimum centerline
radii shall be in conformance with County Standard #114 of
Ordinance 461.
The minimum lot- frontages along the cul-de-sacs and
knuckles shall be 35 feet.
PM 25538
Decet,,ber 26, 1989
Page 3
14.
15a.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
All driveways shall conform to the applicable Riverside
County Standards.
The minimum garage setback shall be 30 feet measured from
the face of curb.
The landowner/developer shall provide/acquire sufficient
public offsite rights of way to provide for a primary
access road to a paved and maintained road. Said access
road shall be constructed in accordance with County
Standard No.. 106, Section B. (32'/60') at a grade and
alignment approved by the Road Commissioner.
Said offsite access road shall be the westerly extension of
Estero Street to Ormsby Road, then southerly on Ormsby Road
to Santiago Road.
Prior to the recordation of the final map, the developer
shall deposit with the Riverside County Road Department, a
cash sum of $150.00 per lot as mitigation for traffic
signal impacts.
Electrical and communications trenches shall be provided in
accordance with Ordinance 461, Standard 817.
Landdivisions creating cut or fill slopes adjacent'to the
streets shall provide erosion control, sight distance
control and slope easements as approved by the Road
Department.
The street design and improvement concept of this project
shall be coordinated with PM 96/39-40, PM 97/11-12, PM
115/71-72, PM 81/83-84 and Tentative PM 24633.
Any landscaping within public road rights of way shall
comply with Road Department standards and require approval
by the Road Comissioner and assurance of continuing.
maintenance through the establishment of a landscape
maintenance 'district/maintenance agreement or similar
mechanism as approved by the Road Commissioner. Landscape
plans shall be submitted on. standard County Plan sheet
format (24" x 36"). Landscape plans shall be submitted
with the street improvement plans and shall depict ~
such landscaping, irrigation and related facilities as are
to be placed within the public road rights-of-way.
PM 25538
Dece~,,ber 26, 1989
P~o 4
21.
EB: Jw
Pursuant to. Section 66493 of the Subdivision Map Act any
subdivision which is part of an existing Assessment
District must comply with the requirements of said Section.
Very truly yours,
Subdivision Engineer
ENVIRONS..[AL IIEALTII :ERVICES DIVISION
~ 6 UNIvERSITy AVENUE
RIVERSIDE, CA 92503
x2,,J,,
SCHEDULE ~/
HA]VER REQUEST?.,~/~)
AP, EA/DI STR i CT
0RD. IIGO
E DEPARTMENT OF HEALTI! tlAS REVIEWED TIlE MAP DESCRIBED ADORE. IF IIIEI1E ARE
Y QUESTIONS CONCERNING THIS. TRANSMITTAL, CONTACT (71q) 787-65q3, OUR
COMMENDATIONS ARE AS FOLLOHS:
Environmental Health Services Division C'.EIISD) has reviewed the above Parcel
and while we are no: privileBed to receive any preliminary Information relative
ubsurface sewaBe disposal or connection t~ sewers or domestic water supply, it
ur considered opinion that the soils titat might be encountered in tht~ area
noC be conducive to e[Eecc~ve subsur[ace 9evaBe d[epoeaZ ayecome and becnune
~ chacactec~ac~cs ~n the area, there may be a requirement lot extensive
~ng, comparison, cutting, etc. Prior to recordat~on o[ the [~naZ map, an
~e Env~conmentaZ Hea~ch Services D~v~s[on~/~
DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF
TH FOR ENVIRONMENTAL
TIt
SAN 117 (REV. IU/89)
(S. IGNAIUliE]
[T]ILE] ,
KENNETH L EDWARDS
CNl!:if I'NGIN[I.
1995 MARKET 5'TREE7
PO. BOX 1033
TELEPHONE (?lA) 787.2OI5
FAX NO. (7~d,I 788-9965
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND
WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
RIVERSIDE. CALIFORNIA 92502'
Riverside County
Planning Department
County Administrative Center
Riverside, California
Attention: Regional Team No. ~
Re: ~ 1.553f).
We have reviewed this case and have the following comments:
Except for nuisance nature local runoff which may traverse portions of the
property the project is considered free from ordinary storm flood hazard.
However, a storm of unusual magnitude could cause some damage. New construc-
tion should comply with all applicable ordinances.
The topography of the area consists of well defined ridges and natural water-
courses which traverse the property. There is adequate area outside of the
natural watercourses for building sites. The natural watercourses should be
kept free of buildings and obstructions in order to maintain the natural
drainage patterns of the area and to prevent flood damage to new buildings.
A note should be placed on an environmental constraint sheet stating, "All new
buildings shall be floodproofed by elevating the finished floors a minimum of
18 inches above adjacent ground surface. Erosion protection shall be provided
for mobile home supports."
This project is in the ~,r~ik Cre,k/fe~,c~%~ V,l~ AI;>P Area
drainage plan fees shall be paid in accordance wit the a;~l e
h icabl riles and
regulations.
The proposed zoning is consistent with existing flood hazards. Some flood
control facilities or floodproofing may be required to fully develop to the
implied density.
The District's report dated
is still current for this project.
The District does not object to the proposed minor change.
This project is a part of
free of ordinary storm flood hazard when improvements ~av:hbeee~r°Ject will be
constructed in
accordance with approved plans.
The attached comments apply.
~ry ~u 1~~,
Fe~~~oH. KASHUBA
r Civti Engineer
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
FIRE DEI'ARTMENT
IN COOPERATION WITH THE
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY
AND FIRE PROTECTION
GLEN J. NEWMAN
FIRE CHIEF
PLANNING & ENGINEERING
4~-Z09 OASIS STREET. SUITE 405
IND[O. CA 92201
(619] 342-8886
TO:
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
12-13-89
ATTN: DIANE KIRKSEY i :' '. , · ... , ,.,
RE: PARCEL MAP 25538
PLANNING & ENGINEERING
3760 IZTH STREET
RIVERSIDE. CA 92501
(714) 787-6606
With respect to the conditions of approval for the above referenced land division,
the Fire Department recommends the following fire protection measures be provided
in accordance with Riverside County Ordinances and/or recognized fire protection
standards:
FIRE PROTECTION
Schedule "G" fire protection. An approved standard fire hydrant (6"x4"x2t")
shall be located so that no portion of the frontage of any lot is more than
330 feet from a fire hydrant. Minimum fire flow shall be 1000 GPM for 2
hours duration at 20 PSI.
The applicant/developer shall provide written certification from the appropriate
water company that the required fire hydrants are either existing or that
financial arrangements have been made to provide them.
The required water system, including fire hydrantS, shall be installed and accepted
by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building material being
placed on an individual lot.
MITIGATION
Prior to the recordation of the final map, the developer shall deposit with
the Riverside County Fire Department, a cash sum of $400.00 per lot/unit as
mitigation for fire protection impacts.
All questions regarding the meaning of conditions shall be referred to the
Planning and Engineering staff.
RAYMOND H. REGIS
Chief Fire Department Planner
Michael E. Gray,
Deputy Fire Department Planner
Administrative Center · 1777 Atlanta Avenue
Riverside, CA 92507
December 20, 1989
Riverside County Planning Department
Attention: D.'Kirksey
County Administrative Center
4080 Lemon Street
Riverside, CA 92501
RE: Parcel Map 25538f
Ladies and Gentlemen:
The Land Use Division of the Department of Building amid SaFeLy
has the following comments and conditions:.
The developer shall obtain Planning Department approval for
all on-site and off-site signage advertising the sale of
the parcel map pursuant to Section 19.5 of Ordinance 348.
Fireplaces may encroach l' into required minimum 5' side yard
setback.
Mechanical equipment may not be located in required minimum 5'
side yard setback.
Very truly yours,
Robert I='inares --"'
Senior Land Use Technician
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
BUILDING AND S~"ETY DEPARTMENT
GRADING SECTION
TO: N IRKS EY ,; t
ROH:
DATE: Hay 1, 1990
RE: PM 25538 .. ,' ....
APN: 945-070-010 I'l..",
The "Grading Section" has reviewed a conceptual grading plan for this site.
The plan is acceptable. Consequently, the "Grading Section" recommends
approval of this project if the following conditions are included.
Prior to commencing any grading in excess of 50 cubic yards, the
applicant shall obtain a grading permit and approval' to construct from
the Building and Safety Department.
All grading shall conf. orm to the
457.
Uniform Building Code and Ordinance
Provide verification that any existing grading was permitted and that
approval to construct was obtained from the Building and Safety
Department. '
Plant and irrigate fill slopes greater than or equal to 3' in vertical
height with grass or ground cover. Slopes that exceed 1~' in vertical
height are to be provided with shrubs and/or trees per count ordinance
457, see form 284-47.
Gradin~ in excess of ~99 cubic yards will require performance securit}'
to be posted with the Building and Safety department.
All drainage facilities shall be designed to accommodate 100 year storm
flows.
OTE: For the final ~ading plan, please provide the applicable information
orm Building and Safety Department grading forms: 284-120, 284-21, 284-86,
nd 284-46. These forms are available at all Building and Safety Offices.
hank 'you.
CITY OF TEMECULA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT
PARCEL MAP NO. 25538
IMPROVEMENTS
FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE
SECURITY
Street and Drainage $ 0.00
Water 0.00
Sewer 0.00
TOTAL $ 0.00
Maintenance Retention $ 0.00
DATE: June 14, 1994
MATERIAL & LABOR
SECURITY
0.00
0~00
0.00
0.00
Monument Security
$ 0.00
Subdivision Warranty
$4,650.00
DEVELOPMENT FEES
City Traffic Signing and Striping Costs
Flood Control (ADP) Fee - paid
Fire Mitigation Fee - paid
Signal Mitigation Fee - paid
Road and Bridge Benefit Fee
Other Development Fees
N/A
,576.00
800.00
300.00
N/A
T.B.D.*
SERVICE FEES
Planning Fee
Comprehensive Transportation Plan
Plan Check Fee
Inspection Fee
Monument Inspection Fee
Fees Paid To Date
Balance of Fees Due
* T.B.D. - To Be Detennined
$ 56.00
$ 4.00
$ 790.00
$ N/A
$ 250.00
$ 1,100.00
$ 0.00
rAagdrpt\94\0614~pm25538. agnlajp
ITEM NO. I 1
APPROVAL ~
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
City 'Council/City Manager
/~Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
June 14, 1994
SUBJECT:
Final Parcel Map No. 24633- Northeast Corner of Estero Street and Ormsby
Road
PREPARED BY.~'RRaymond A. Casey, Principal Engineer - Land Development
~)~Annie Bostre-Le, Engineering Technician - Land Development
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council approve Final Parcel Map No. 24633 subject to the Conditions of
Approval.
BACKGROUND:
Tentative Parcel Map No. 24633, Amendment No. 3 was approved by the City of Temecula
Planning Director on February 18, 1993. The Developer has met all of the Conditions of
Approval.
Final Parcel Map No. 24633 is a proposed two (2) lot residential subdivision of 1.43 acres
located at the northeast corner of Estero Street end Ormsby Road. The site currently is
vacant. Surrounding land use is existing residential development. The site is zoned Rural
Residential (R-R). The established zoning on the property conforms with the land use
designation on the General Plan for the City of Temecula.
The following fees have been paid for Final P~M. 24633:
Area Drainage Fee
$1,595.00
Traffic Signal Mitigation Fee
Fire Mitigation Fee
$ 300.00
$ 800.00
r:~agdrpt%94%0614';m24633.agn/a~
The following fees have been deferred for Final Parcel Map No. 24633:
Area Drainage Fee (Balance of $1,163.00)
Stephen's K-Rat Mitigation Fee
Library Fees
Public Facilities Fee
Due prior to grading permit
Due prior to grading permit
Due prior to building permit
Due prior to building permit
The public improvements associated with this parcel map were constructed prior to map
recordation, therefore construction bonds are not required. Pursuant to Condition 33, the
developer has constructed Estero Street with full street improvements within the dedicated
right-of-way. The developer and the City are currently processing a reimbursement agreement,
for the constructed improvements, on behalf of the applicant (see attached letter). There are
no improvement costs to the City associated with this reimbursement agreement.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
ATTACHMENTS:
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Development Fee Checklist
Project Location Map
Sheet 2 of Final Parcel Map No. 24633
Conditions of Approval
Fees & Securities Report
Reimbursement Letter
r.%aOdfpt%94%0614%pm24633.egn/ej;
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEVELOPMENT FEE CHECKUST
Final Vesting Parcel Mao No. 24633
The following fees were reviewed by Staff relative to their applicability to this project.
FEE
Habitat Conservation Plan
(K-Rat)
Parks and Recreation
(Quimby Fees)
Traffic Signal Mitigation
CONDITION OF APPROVAL
Condition No. 15
C.O.A. dated 10/15/90 (1)
Condition No. 44
C.O.A. dated 2/18/93 (2)
Condition No. 24
C.O.A. dated 10/15/90 (1)
Library Condition No. ~.~,
C.O.A. dated 10/15/90 (1)
Fire Mitigation
Condition No. 10
C.O.A. dated 10/15/90 (1)
Flood Control Condition No. 23
(ADP) C.O.A. dated 2/18/93 (2)
Public Facility
Condition No. 40
C.O.A. dated 2/18/93 (2)
(1) Original Conditions of Approval
(2) Conditions of Approval, Amendment No. 3
r.%agdrpt%94%0614%pm24633,egn/ejp
o
SANTIAGO
LA
.S'T~E.ET ,V~'RA
COLINA ESTERO STREET
VERDE '
~~]~TER
m 'ca ROAD
~ ~ ROAD
PARCEL MAP NO. 246,.I,.I
.I
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Tentative Parcel Map No. No. 24633, Amendment
No. 3
Project Description: One year extension of time
for Tentative Parcel Map No. 24633, Amendment
No. 3 - a two (2) parcel residential subdivision of
a: 1.43 acre parcel '
Assessor's Parcel No.: 945-070-012
Approval Date: February 18, 1993
Expiration Date: October 15, 1993
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
The tentative subdivision shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act
and to all the requirements of Ordinance No. 460, unless modified by the conditions
listed below. A time extension may be approved in accordance with the State Map
Act and City Ordinance, upon written request, if made 30 days prior to the expiration
date.
.2.
e
The subdivider shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Temecula, it
agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City
of Temecula, its advisory agencies, appeal boards or legislative body concerning
Tentative Parcel Map No. 24633, Amendment No. 3, First Extension of Time, which
action is brought within the time period provided for in California Government Code
Section 66499.37. The City of Temecula will promptly notify the subdivider of any
such claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula and will cooperate fully
in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim,
action, or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the subdivider shall not,
thereafter, be respo.nsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City of Temecula.
'-Tentative Parcel' Map No. 24633'~ Amendment No. 3~ First Extension of Time shall
comply with all Conditions of Approval for Tentative Parcel Map No. 24633,
Amendment No. 3 unless superseded by these Conditions of Approval·
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS
e
A Mitigation Monitoring Program shall be submitted and approved by the Planning
Director.
5. A copy of the Rough Grading plans shall be submitted.
e
A qualified paleontologist shall be chosen by the developer for consultation and
comment on the proposed grading with respect to potential paleontological impacts.
Should the paleontologist find potential is high for impact to significant resources, a
pre-grade meeting between the paleontologist, Planning Director staff and-the
excavation and grading contractor shall be arranged. Mitigation measures shall be
R:%S%STAFFRPT%24833.COA 2/23/93 idb
approved by the Planning Department along with a Mitigation Monitoring Program.
When necessary, the paleontologist or' representative shall have the authority to
temporarily divert, redirect or halt grading activity to allow recovery of fossils.
PRIOR TO RECORDATION OF THE RNAL MAP
The following shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Director:
a.. A copy of the Final Map
b. . A copy of the Environmental Constraint Sheet '(ECS)
The following notes shall be added to the Environmental Constraint
Sheet (ECS):
(1) This property is located within thirty (30) miles of Mount Palomar
Observatory. All proposed outdoor lighting systems shall comply
with the California Institute of Technology; Palomar Observatory
recommendations.
The applicant shall demonstrate by submittal of a written report that all mitigation
measures identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Program have been satisfied for this
stage of development.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS
9. The following shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Director:
Precise Grading Plans consistent with the approved Rough Grading Plans which
include the following:
All structural setback measurements
10.
o
ii. Building elevations
Roof-mounted mechanical equipment shall not be permitted within the residential
portion of the subdivision, however solar equipment or any other energy saving devices
shall be permitted with Planning Director approval. Roof-mounted equipment may be
allowed for commercial structures if they are architecturally screened from view from
the adjoining streets and properties.
11.
The applicant shall demonstrate by'submittal of a-written report'that all mitigation
measures identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Program have been satisfied for this
stage of development.
R:%S~STAFFRP"~4833.COA 2/23/93 klb
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
The following are additional Conditions of Approval of the Department of Public Works for this
project, and shall be completed at no cost to .any Government Agency. All previous
Conditions of Approval shall remain in force except as amended or superseded by the
following requirements. All questions regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be
referred to the appropriate staff person .of the Department of Public Works.
It is understood that the Developer correct!y shows on the current tentative map or site plan
all existing and proposed easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage
courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and
revision.
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
12.
13.
A Grading Permit for either rough or. precise (including all onsite flat work and
improvements) construction shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works
prior to commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained road right-
of-way.
An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior
to commencement of any. construction within an existing or proposed City
right-of-way.
14.
All improvement plans, grading plans, landscape and irrigation plans shall be
coordinated for consistency with' adjacent projects and ~xisting improvements
contiguous to the site. -.
15.
Pursuant to Section 66493 of the Subdivision Map Act, any subdivision which is part
of an existing Assessment District must comply with the requirements of said section.
PRIOR
16.
TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS
The final grading plan shall be prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer and shall be
reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works.
17.
All lot drainage shall be directed to the driveway by side yard drainage swales
independent of any other lot.
18.
Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board.
No grading shall be permitted until an NP~ES NOtice of Intent has been filed or the
project is shown to be exempt.
R:~S~TAFFRPT~24833.COA 2/23/93 klb
I
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
The developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies:
San Diego Regional Water Quality;
Riverside County Rood Control District;
Planning Department;
Department of Public Works;
Riverside County Health Department;
General Telephone;
Southern California Edison Company; and
Southern California Gas Company.
A Soils Report shall be prepared by a registered soils engineer and submitted to the
Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan cjqeck. The report shall
address all soils conditions of the site,. and provide recommendations for the
construction of engineered structures and pavement sections.
An erosion control plan shall b~ prepared by a registered civil engineer and submitted
to the Department of. Public Works for review and approval.
Graded but undeveloped land shall be maintained in a weedfree condition and shall be
either planted with interim landscaping or provided with other erosion control measures
as approved by the Department of. Public Works.
A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the prevailing Area
Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new development. The charge is
payable to the Rood Control District prior to issuance of permits. If the full Area
Drainage Plan. fee or mitigation charge has been already credited to this property, no
new charge needs to be paid.
The developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or easements for any
offsite work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public
Works.
The subdivider shall accept and properly dispose of all off-site drainage flowing onto
or through the Site. In the event the Department of Public Works permits the use of
streets for drainage purposes, the provisions of Section XI of Ordinance No. 460 will
apply. Should the quantities exceed the street capacity, or use of streets be prohibited
for drainage purposes, the subdivider shall provide adequate facilities as approved by
the Department of Public Works.
The subdivider shall protect downstream properties from damages caused by alteration
of the drainage patterns; i;e., concentration or diversion of flow. Protection shall be
provided by constructing adequate drainage facilities, including enlarging existing
facilities or by securing a drainage easement.
A drainage easement shall be obtained from the affected property owners for the
release of concentrated or diverted storm flows onto the adjacent property. A copy
of the drainage easement shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for
review prior to recordation. The location of the recorded easement shall be delineated
on the grading plan.
R:~S%STAFFRFT'~,4633.COA 2/23/93 Idb
PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ENCROACHMENT PERMITS
28.
All necessary grading permit requirements shall have been completed and approved to
the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works.
29.
The following criteria shall be observed in the design of the improvement plans to be
submitted to the Department of Public Works:
Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P~C.C. and 1.00% minimum .over
· A.C. paving.
Street lights shall be installed along the public streets adjoining the Bite in
accordance with Ordinance 461 end shall be shown on the improvement plans
as directed by the Department of Public Works.
Ce
All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees or as
approved by the Department of Public Works.
Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-Off area of all intersections and
adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility.
ke
All concentrated drainage directed towards the public street shall be conveyed
through undersidewalk drains.
· 30.
All driveways shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula standards and shall be
shown on the street improvement plans' in accordance with City Standard 207 and
208.
31. All driveways shall be located a minimum of two (2) feet from the side property line.
32.
All utility systems including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer, and cable 'IV shall
be provided for underground, with easements provided as required, and designed and
constructed in accordance with City Codes and the utility provider. Telephone, cable
TV, and/or ~ecurity systems shall be pre-wired in the residence.
33. All utilities, except electrical lines rated 33kv or greater, shall be installed underground.
PRIOR TO RECORDATION OF RNAL MAP
34.
An access easement 20 feet in width along the westerly boundary line of Parcel I shall
be reserved in favor of the northerly portion of parcel 1 of Parcel Map 13888, PM Book
104/10-11.
35.
Easements, when required for roadway ~lopes, landscape easements, drainage
facilities, utilities, etc., shall be shown on the final map if they are located within the
land division boundary. All offers of dedication and conveyances shall be submitted
for review and recorded as directed by the Department of Public Works. On-site
drainage facilities located outside of road right-of-way shall be contained within
drainage easements and shown on the final map. A note shall be added to the final
map stating "drainage easements shall be kept free of buildings and obstructions."
R:~S~STAFFRFT~4633.COA 2/23/93 Idb
36.
37.
The developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an
Environmental 'Constraint Sheet recorded with any underlying maps related to the
subject property.
Prior to recording the final map, the subdivider shall notify the City's CA'IV Franchises
of the Intent to Develop. Conduit shall be installed to CATV Standards at time of
street improvements.
PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT
38.
A precise grading plan shall be;submitted to the Department of Public Works for review
and approval.. The building pad shall be certified by a registered Civil Engineer for
location and elevation, and the Soils Engineer shall issue a Final Soils Report addressing
compaction and site conditions.
39.
Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code,
the approved grading plan, the conditions of the grading permit, City Grading
Standards and accepted grading construction practices. The final grading plan shall
be in substantial conformance with the approved rough grading plan.
40.
Developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities imposed
upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public facility mitigation as
required under the EIR/Negative Declaration for the project. The fee to be paid shall
be in the amount' in effect at the time of payment of the fee. If an interim or final
public facility mitigation fee or district has not been finally established by the date on
which developer requests its building permits for the project or any phase thereof, the
developer shall execute the Agreement for payment of Public Facility fee, a copy, of
which has been provided to developer. Concurrently, with executing this Agreement,
developer shall post a bond to secure payment of the Public Facility fee. The amount
of the bond shall be ~2.00 per square foot, not to exceed ~10,000. Developer
understands that said Agreement may require the payment of fees in excess of those
now estimated (assuming benefit to .the project in the amount of such fees). By
execution of this Agreement, developer will waive any right to protest the provisions
of this Condition, of this Agreement~ thef0rmation of any traffic impact fee district,
or the process, levy,-or Collection of any traffic mitigation or traffic impact fee for this
project; provided 'that developer is not waiving its right to protest the reasonableness
of any traffic impact fee, and the amount thereof.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY
41.
42.
All improvements shall be completed and in place per the approved plans, including but
not limited to, curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, drainage
facilities, parkway trees and street lights on all interior public streets.
Landscaping installed in the corner cu~off area of all intersection and adjacent to
driveways shall be reviewed and approved in the field for minimum sight distance as
directed by the Department of Public Works.
R:~S~STAFFRPT~24633.COA 2/23/93 Idb
43.
Asphaltic emulsion (fog seal) shall be applied only as directed by the Department of
Public Works at a rate of 0.05 gallon per square yard. Asphalt emulsion shall conform
to Section Nos. 37, 39, and 94 of the State Standard Specifications.
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
44.
Upon the request of a building permit for construction of residential structures on one
or more of the parcels within four years following approval of tentative map, parcel
map, Or planned development, real estate development, stock cooperative,Community
apartment project and condcminium for which a tentative map or'parcel map is filed,
a predetermined Quimby Act Fee in the amount equal to the fair mar. ket value of
required acreage shall be paid by the owner of each such parcel(s) as a condition to
the issuance of such permit as authorized by City Ordinance No. 460.93.
OTHER AGENCIES
45.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Rancho California
Water District transmittal dated September 29, 1992, a copy of which is attached.
R:~S~STAFFRFT~4633.COA 2/22/93 Idb
Itan 0
O~cers:
John F. Hennigar
General Manager
Phillip L Forl>es
Direaor oF Finance -
E, P, 'Bob" Lemons
Director of
Keueth C,
& Msin~nan~
Pe~ ~ ~uck
Controller
~nda ~.
~al
September 29, 1992
RECEIVED
OCT O 1 1992
Mr. Matthew Fagan
.City. of Temeeula
Planning Department
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
Water Availability
Parcel Map 24633
First Extension of Time
Dear Mr. Fagan:
Please be advised that the above-referenced property Ls located witbjn the
boundaries of Rancho CaLifornia Water District CRCWD). Water service,
therefore, would be available upon completion of financial arrangements
between RCWD and the property owner.
Water availability would be contingent upon the property owner signing an
Agency Agreement which assigns water management rights, ff any, to
If you have any questions, please contact Ms. Senga Doherty.
Sirxce~ely,.
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTPdCT
Steve Brannon, P. E.
Manager of Development Engineering
SB:SD:aj300/F186
cc: Senga Doherty, Engineering Technician
Rancho California Water District
·
:2,.A,il l)mz R4,ld , I~,:~ 411111~ I~,,x 9(117 * Temtq.'ula. ('ali&,nml .tr~'~49-!lllI7 * ,711HIT5--IIIl! · FAX ,71-1,4571;-4161~
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Tentative Parcel Map No. 24633
Commission Approval Date: October 15, 1990
Expiration Date: October25, 1992
Planninq Department
1. The subdivider shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of
Temecula, its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or
proceeding against the City of Temecula or its agents, officers, or employees
to attack, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the City of Temecula, its
advisory agencies, appeal boards or legislative body concerning Tentative
Parcel Map No. 24633, which action is brought within the timeperiod provided
for in California Government Code Section 66499.37. The City of Temecula will
promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding
against the City of Temecula and will cooperate fully in the defense. If the
City fails to promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or
proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the subdivider shall not,
thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City of
Temecula.
2. The tentative parcel map shall conform 'to the requirements of Ordinance 460,
Schedule G unless modified by the conditions listed below. This approved
tentative parcel map will expire two years after the Planning Commission
approval date unless extended as provided by Ordinance
3. The final map shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer or licensed land
surveyor subject to all the requirements of the State of California Subd!vision
Map Act, Riverside county Subdivision Ordinance q450,
All road easements shall be offered for dedication to the public and shall
continue in force until the governing body accepts or abandons such offerr.
All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the City.
Street names shall be subject to approval of the City of Temecula.
5. Easements, when required for roadway slopes, drainage facilities, utilities,
etc., shall be shown on the final map if within the land division boundary. All
offers of dedication shall provide for nonexclusive public road and utility
access. All easements, offers of dedication and conveyances shall be
submitted and recorded as directed by the City of Temecula.
6. Legal access as required by Ordinance 460 shall be provided from the parcel
map boundary to a City maintained road.
STAFFRPT\PM24633 1
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
All delinquent property taxes shall be paid prior to recordation of the final
map.
The subdivide shall comply with the environmental health recommendations
outlined in the County Health Department's Transmittal dated 12-5-89, a copy
of which is attached.
The subdivider shai) comply with the flood control recommendations outlined
in the Riverside County Flood Control District's letter dated 1-6-90 a copy of
which is attached. If the land division iies within an adopted flood contrel
drainage area pursuant to Section 10.25 of Riverside County Land Division
Ordinance ~60, appropriate fees for the construction of area drainage facilities
shall be collected by the Road Commissioner prior to recordation of the final
map or waiver of parcel map.
The subdivider shall comply with the fire improvement recommendations
outlined in the County Fire Department's letter dated 5-u,-90, a copy of which
is attached·
The subdivider shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Building
and Safety Department: Land Use Section's transmittal dated 3-6-90, a copy
of which is attached.
The subdivider shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Building
and Safety Department: Grading Section's transmittal dated 3-19-90, a copy
of which is attached.
The subdivider shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the San
Bernardino County Museum transmittal dated 7-:28-90, a copy of which is
attached.
Prior to issuance of building permits, applicant shall be required to pay
applicable Quimby fees in accordance with,Section 10.35 of Ordinance
Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall comply with the
provisions of Ordinance No. 663 by paying the appropriate fee set forth in
that ordinance· Should Ordinance No. 663 be superseded by the provisions
of a Habitat Conservation Plan prior to the payment of the fee required by
Ordinance No. 663, the applicant shall pay the fee required by the Habitat
Conservation Plan as implemented by County ordinance or resolution-
Lots created by this subdivision shall be in conformance with the development
standards of the R-R zone.
An Environmental Constraints Sheet (ECS) shall be prepared with the final
map to delineate identified environmental concerns and shall be permanently
filed with the office of the City Engineer. PriOr to the recordation of the final
map, a coy of the ECS shall be forwarded with copies of the recorded final map
to the Planning Department and the Department of Building and Safety. The
following note(s) shall be placed on the Environmental Constraints Sheet.
a. "This property is located within thirty 130) miles of Mount Palomar
STAFFRPT\PM244i33 2
Observatory. Light and glare may adversely impact operations at the
Observatory- Outdoor lighting shall be from low pressure sodium lamps
that are oriented and shielded to prevent direct illumination above the
horizontal plane passing through the luminare."
Indicate the availability of domestic water services to the subject
property as of the date of recordation of the final map.
The following note shall be placed on the final map: Constraints
affecting this property are shown on the accompanying Environmental
Constraints Sheet, the original of which is on file at the office of the
City Engineer. These constraints affect all parcels.
Enqineerinq Department
The following are the Engineering Department Conditions of Approval for this
project, and shall be completed at no cost to any Covernment Agency. All questions
regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the Engineering
Department.
it is understood that the Developer correctiy ,shows all existing easements, traveled
ways, and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be
resubmitted for further consideration.
The Developer shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act, and all
applicable City Ordinances and Resolutions.
PRIOR TO FINAL MAP APPROVAL:
18. Prior to fi nal map approval, the developer shall receive written clearance from
the following agencies:
- Rancho California Water District;
- Riverside County Flood Control District;
- City of Temecula Fire Bureau;
- Planning Department;
- Engineering Department;
- Riverside County Health Department; and
- CATV Franchise.
19. The final map shall be prepared by a licensed land surveyor or registered
Civil Engineer, subject to all the requirements of the State of California
Subdivision Map Act and Ordinance No. 460.
20. The subdivider shall construct or post security guaranteeing the construction
of the following public improvements in conformance with applicable City
standards.
'a. Street improvements, including, but not limited to: pavement, curb
and gutter, drive approaches, street lights, signing, and striping.
b. A domestic water system.
STAFFRPT\PM24633 3
21. The subdivider shall provide bonds and agreement, clearances from all
applicable agencies and pay all fees prior to the approval of the final map.
22, The street design and improvement concept of this project shall be coordinated
with adjoining developments.
23. Street lights shall be provided along streets adjoining the subject site in
accordance with the standards of Ordinance No, 461 and as approved by the
City Engineer.
24. Prior to recordation of the final map, the developer shall deposit with the
Engineering Department a cash sum established per lot as mitigation for s
traffic signal impact.
25. Should th~ developer choose to defer the time of payment of traffic signal
mitigation fee, he may enter into a written agreement with the City deferring
said payment to the time of issuance of a building permit.
The subdivider shall submit four copies of a soils report to the Engineering
Department. The report shall address the soils stability and geological
· conditions of the site.
27. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid
and an encroachment permit shall be obtained from the City Engineerrs Office,
in addition to any other permits required.
28. Street improvement plans including parkway trees and street lights prepared
by a Registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer shall be
required for all public streets prior to issuance of an encroachment permit.
Final plans and profiles shall show the location of existing utility facilities
within the right-of-way.
2b. All driveways shall be located a minimum of two {2) feet from the property
line.
30. All driveways shall be constructed. along all public street frontages in
accordance with City Standard Nos. ~00 and L~01 {curb sidewalk).
31. A minimum centerline grade shall be 0.50 percent.
32. The required improvements as reflected in the following conditions shall be
completed prior to issuance of Certificates of Occupancy. The improvements
are required based on the following findings:
a. The improvements are a necessary prerequisite to the orderly
development of the surrounding area...
b. The improvements are necessary for the public health and safety.
STAFFRPT\PM24633 L~
33. Estero Street shall be improved with full street improvements within the
dedicated right-of-way in accordance with County Standard No. 105, Section
B [36/60) with concrete curb and gutter. The developer shall enter into a
reimbursement agreement with the City for the construction of Estero Street
east of Ormsby Road. Parcel 2 and Parcel i~ of Parcel Map No. 16705 shall be
required to reimburse the developer for the cost of design and construction
of Estero Street within their frontage prior to any permit issuance or prior to
any subdivision approval.
34. A driveway approach shall be provided on Estero Street for the private drive
on Parcel 1.
35. Improvement plans shall be based upon a centerline profile extending a
minimum of 300 feet beyond the project boundaries at a grade and alignment
as appro~/ed by the City Engineer.
36. Prior to final map. the subdivider shall notify the City's CATV Franchises of
the intent to develop. Conduit shall be installed to CATV Standards prior to
issuance of Certificates of Occupancy-
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY:
37. Construct half street improvements including but not limited to, curb and
gutter, A.C. pavement, drive approaches, parkway trees and street lights
within the parcel map boundary in accordance with Riverside County Standard
No. 105, Section B 136/60).
38. All street improvements shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer.
39. Aspbaltic emulsion Ifo9 seal) shall be applied not less than lzi days following
placement of the asphalt surfacing and shall be applied at a rate of 0.05 gallon
per square yard. Asphalt emulsion shall conform to Section Nos. 37, 39, and
94 of the State Standard Specifications.
40. Developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities
imposed upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public
facility mitigation as required under the Negative Declaration for the project,
in the amount in effect at the time of payment of the fee. If an interim or final
public facility mitigation fee or district has not been finally established by the
date on which Developer requests its building permits for the project or any
phase thereof, the Developer shall execute the Agreement for Payment of
Public Facility Fee, a copy of which has been provided to Developer.
Developer understands that said Agreement may require the payment of fees
in excess of those now estimated [assuming benefit to the project in the
amount of such fees) and specifically waives its right to protest such
increase.
STAFFRPT\PM2L~633 5
Transportation Enqlneerinq
PRIOR TO RECORDATION:
41. A signing and striping plan shall be designed by a registered Traffic
Engineer, and approved by the City Engineer, and shall be included in the
street improvement plans.
42. Prior to designing any of. the above plans, contact Transportation Engineering
for the design criteria.
PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF OCCUPANCY PERMITS:
43. All signing and striping shall be installed per the City standards and the
approved signing and striping plan.
44. Prior to the issuance of BUILDING PERMITS the following conditions shall be
satisfied:
No building permits shall be issued by the City for any residential
lot/unit within the project boundary until the developerms SUCCessOrls'
in-interest provides evidence of compliance with public facility
financing measures. A cash sum of one-hundred dollars ($100) per
lot/unit shall be deposited with the City as mitigation for public library
development.
STAFFRPT\PM24633
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
FIRE DEPARTMENT
IN COOPERATION WITH THE
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY
AND FIRE PROTECTION
CLF. N J. NEWMAN
fIRE CHIEF
May 4, 1990
PLANNING & ENGINEERING
46409 OASIS STREET, SUITE 405
INDIO. CA 9220I
(619) 341-8886
TO:
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PLANNING & ENGINEERING
3760 I2.'II-I STREET
RIVERSID.F, CA 9zS0t
(714) 787-6606 .
ATTN: DIVINE KIRKSEY
RE: PARCEL MA~ 24633 - AMENDED 41 - ROAD CORRECTION ~1
Wieh re;pect to the conditions of approval for the above referenced land division,
,the Fire Department recommends the following fire protection measures be provided
in accordance wi~h Riverside County Ordinances and/or recognized fire protection
s6andards:
FIRE pROTECTION
Schedule "G" fire protection approved standard fire hydrants, (6"x4"x2~") located
one a= each streee intersection and spaced no more than 660 fact apar~ in any
direction, with no portion of any lot frontage more than 330 feet from a hydrant.
Minimum fire flow shall be 1000 GPM for 2 hours duration at 20 PSI.
Applicant/developer shall furnish one copy of the we=or system plans to the
Fire Department for review. Plans shall conform to fire hydrant types, loca=ion
~nd spacing, and, the system shall meet thd fire flow requirements. Plans shall
be signed/approved by a registered civil engineer and the local water company
with the following certification: "I certify ~hat the design of the water 'system
is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Riverside County Fire
Dept."
The required water system including fire hydrants shall be installed and accepted
by the appropriate water agencyprior to any combustible building material being
placed. on an individual lot.
MITIGATION
Prior t~ the recordation of the final map, the developer shall deposit with
the Riverside County Fire Department, a cash sum o~;$400.00 per lot/unit as
mitigation for'fire protection impacts.
HAZARDOUS FIRE AREA
The land division is located in the "Hazardous Fire Area" of Riverside County
as shown on a map on file with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors- Any ~
building constructed on lots created by this' land division shall comply with
the special ~onstruction provisions contained in Riverside County Ordinance
546. ~
RE: PM 24633
Page 2
All questions regardinE the meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the
Fire Department Planning and Engineering staff.
RAYMOND H. KEGIS
Chief Fire Department Planner
By
Kurt Mantwell, Fire Safety Specialist
ml
KENNETH L. EDWARDS
1995 MARKET STREET
P,O. BOX 1033
TELEPHONE (714) 787-2015
FAX NO. (714) 788-9965
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND
WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
RIVERSIDE. CALIFORNIA 92502
Riverside County
P1 anning Department
County Administrative Center
Riverside, California
Attention: Regional Team No.
Planner '~>j~,- ~i,~-s~ ~.,~,_=t Ho. /
Area:
We have reviewed this case and have the following comments:
v-//~Except for nuisance nature local runoff which may traverse portions of the
property the project is considered free from ordinary storm flood hazard.
However, a storm of unusual magnitude could cause some damage. New construc-
tion should comply with all applicable ordinances.
The topography of the area consists of well defined ridges and natural water-
' courses which traverse the property. There is adequate area outside of the
natural watercourses for building sites. The natural watercourses should be
kept free of buildings and obstructions in order to maintain the natural
drainage patterns of the area and to prevent flood damage to new buildings.
A note should be placed on an environmental constraint sheet stating, "All new
' buildings shall be floodproofed by elevating the finished floors a minimum of
18 inches above adjacent ground surface. Erosion protection shall be provided
for mobi 1 e home supports."
v//'Thi s project i s in the houz~cTA cY-~=~-/T~ccu~ ~Z~_uC-r ~j~r . Area
drainage plan fees shall be paid in accordance with the applicable rules and
regulations.
The proposed zoning is consistent with existing flood hazards.' Some flood
control facilities or floodproofing may be required to fully develop to the
implied density.
The District's report dated is still current for this project.
The District does not 'object to the proposed minor change.
This project is a part of ' ect will be
accordance with approved plans.
The attached comments apply.
cc: I~EI, IF_SH ENGt~ECF-t~G
~ry rt~Li~,
· I v ' ~n i neer
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT
GRADING SECTION
TO:
FROH:
DATE:
RE:
APN:
PLANNING / DIANE KIRKSEY
TONY HARMON ~,,
Harch 19, 1990
PH 24633 AHENDHENT ~ 1
923-370-010-,022
The "Grading Section" has reviewed a conceptual grading plan for this site.
The plan is acceptable. Consequently, the "Grading Section" recommends
approval of this project if the following conditions are included.
Prior to commencing any grading in excess of 50 cubic yards, the
applicant shall obtain a grading permit and approval to construct from
the Building and Safety Department.
All grading shall conform to Chapter 70 of .the 1988 Uniform Building
Code as amended by Ordinance 457.?3.
Prior to issuance of any building permit, the property owner shall
obtain a grading permit and approval to construct from the Building and
Safety Department.
Prior to obtaining any further permits, provide verification that any
existing grading was permitted and that approval to construct was
obtained from the Building and Safety Department~
Plant and irrigate fill slopes greater than or equal to 3' and/or cut
slopes greater than or equal to 5' in vertical height with grass or
ground cover. Slopes that exceed 15' in Vertical height are to be
'provided with shrubs and/or trees per count ordinance 457, see form 284-
47.
Grading in excess of 199 cubic yards will require performance security
to be posted with the Building and Safety.department-
NOTE: For the final grading plan, please provide the applicable information
form Building .and Safety Department grading forms: 284-120, 284-21,284-86,
and 284-46. These forms are available at all Building and' Safety Offices-
SAN I::RNARDINO COUN fY MUSEUM
202 '~ge Tree Lane , Redlends. CA 92374
,"'4., .Z-1334 * 792-0052 * 825-4825 · 825-4823
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
GENERAL SERVICES AGENCY
DR. ALLAN O. GRIESEMER
Director
July 28, 199U
City of Temecula Development Review Committee
'remecula Planning Department
43180 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92390
re: PALEON'I'OLOGIC SENSITIVITY REVIEW
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on nonrenewable paleontologic
resources within the City of Temecula. The museum generally reviews
proposed developments on an individual basis. This review, however, will
'summarized cases following the August 2 agentis you forwarded in order to
insure a timely response.
C.U.P. No. 1
No recommendations are offered in regard to paleontologic resources.
e
T.P.M. 23969
No recommendations are offered in regard to paleontologic resources.
e
TT 25443
The parcel is located on the fossiliferous Pauba Formation. Construction
excavation will impact nonrenewable paleontologic resources.
The developer must retain a qualified vertebrate paleontologist to
develop a site-specific program to mitigate impacts to paleontologic
resources. This program should include: (1} monitoring of excavation
by a qualified paleontologic monitor; (2~ preparation of recovered
specimens, including sediment processing for small vertebrate fossils;
curation of specimens into. an established repository; and {41 a report of
findings with complete specimen inventory.
TT Map 25603
The parcel is located on the fossiliferous Pauba Formation. Construction
excavation will impact nonrenewable paleontologic resources.
The developer must retain a qualified vertebrate paleontologist to
develop a site-specific program to mitigate impacts to paleontologic
resources. This program should include: {1} monitoring of excavation
by a qualified paleontologic monitor; {2} preparation of recovered
specimens, including sediment processing for small vertebrate fossils; {3}
curation of specimens into an ~stablished. repository; and {4} a report of
findings with complete specimen inventory.
e
PM 24633
The parcel is located on the foesiliferous Pauba Formation. Construction
excavation will impact nonrenewable paleontologic resources.
The developer must retain a qualified vertebrate paleontologist to
(:lty of Temecuia palco. r;vtew p. 2
develop a site-specific pr.ogram to mitigate impacts to paleontologic
resources. This program should include: {1} monitoring of excavation
by a qualified paleontologic mon{tor; {2} preparation of recovered
specimens, including sediment processing for small vertebrate fossils;
curation of specimens into an established repository; and (4) a report of
findings with complete specimen inventory.
PP 74
No recommendations are offered in regard to paleontologic resources.
PP 86
No recommendations are offered in regard to paleontologic resources.
PP 76
The parcel is located on the fossiliferous Pauba Formation. Construction
excavation will impact nonrenewable paleontologic resources.
The developer must retain a qualified vertebrate paleontologist to ,
develop a site-specific program to mitigate impa~ts to paleontologic
resources. This program should include: {1) monitoring of excavation
by a qualified paleontologic monitor; {2) preparation of recovered
specimens, including sediment processing for small vertebrate fossils; (3)
curation of specimens into an established repository; and (4} a report of
findings with complete specimen inventory.
Robert E. Reynolds
Cu,'ator, Ear'-h Sciences
San Bernardino County Museum
CITY OF TEMECULA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT
PARCEL MAP NO. 24633
IMPROVEMENTS
Street and Drainage
Water
Sewer
TOTAL
Maintenance Retention
DATE: June 14, 1994
FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE MATERIAL & LABOR
SECURITY SECURITY
0.00 ~ 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 $ 0.00
0.00
Monument Security
$ 0.00
Note: Public improvements associated with this parcel map have been constructed, therefore
bonds are not required.
DEVELOPMENT FEES
City Traffic Signing and Striping Costs
Flood Control (ADP) Fee - paid
Fire Mitigation Fee - paid
Signal Mitigation Fee - paid
Road and Bridge Benefit Fee
Other 'Development Fees
SERVICE FEES
Planning Fee
Comprehensive Transportation Plan
Plan Check Fee
Inspection Fee
Monument Inspection Fee
Fees Paid To Date
Balance of Fees Due
· T.B.D. - To Be Determined
0.00
2,758.00
800.00
300.00
N/A
T.B.D*
56.00
4.00
790.00
N/A
250.00
100.00
0.00
r.%agdrpt%94\0614~prn24633.agnlajp
MARKHAM & ASSOCIATES
13~k~pm~l C~nsullanl~
May 17, 1994
City of Temecula
Tim Serlet, City Engineer
43174 Business Park Dr.
Temecula, CA 92590
SUbject: PM 24533 - Paine
Condition 33 ' - Reimbursement
Estero Street and Ormsby Road
Map Recordation
Dear Tim:
The applicant agrees to proceed with the recordation of the subject
map at the City Council meeting of May 25, 1994, with the
understanding that the mechanism to accomplish the re~eement
has not been completed. The applicant and the City of Temecula
agree to continue in good faith to complete the reimbursement
requirement of condition 33 and that the condition is to the
benefit of the applicant.
Sincerely,
,M~LKHAM &.. SSOCIATES
ry R. Markham
pal
attachment
cc: N.J. Paine
41750 Winchester Road, Sult~ N · Tcmecuta, California 92590 - (909) 676-6672 · FAX (909) 699-I848
30SS~ ~ WdH>~W ~T :88 ~6, L~ N~f
· ITEM :'N O. 12
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICI~
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Tim D. Serlet, Director Of Public Works/City Engineer
June 14, 1994
Bond Reduction and Substitute Subdivision Improvement
Agreement and new Public Improvement Bonds in Tract No.
22915-2.
AI
PREPARED BY: bert Crisp, Permit Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council AUTHORIZE a sixty-five (65) percent reduction in Faithful Performance
Street, Water, and Sewer improvement bond amounts, ACCEPT the substitute Subdivision
Improvement Agreement and new Public Improvement Bonds in Tract No. 22915-2, and
DIRECT the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Surety·
BACKGROUND:
On May .8, 1990, the Riverside County Road Commissioner and Deputy Clerk of the Board of
Supervisors approved Tract No. 22915-2 on behalf of the City of Temecula. Subdivision
Agreements and Surety Bonds were submitted by:
Tayco (Joint Venture of Taylor Woodrow Homes & Cosrain Homes, Inc.)
4921 Birch Street, Suite 110
Newport Beach, CA 92660
For the improvement of streets, installation of sewer and water systems, and subdivision
monumentation. Acoompanying the subdivision agreements were surety bonds issued by
American Home Assurance Company as follows:
2.
3.
4.
Bond No. PB 300 11 964 in the amount of $1,792,500to cover street improvements.
Bond No. PB 300 11 964 in the amount of $109,500 to cover water improvements.
Bond No. PB 300 11 964 in the amount of $185,500to cover sewer improvements·
Bond No. PB 300 11 964 in'the amount of $1,043,750to cover material and labor for
street, weter, end sewer improvements.
r:%agdrpt%94~O614~tr22915-21ac
5. Bond No. PB 300 11 965 in the amount of $40,000 to cover subdivision
monumentation.
Effective December 31, 1993,' Costain Homes Inc. withdrew from the joint venture
partnership. The subject Tract No. 22915-2is one of three for which Costain Homes Inc. has
become the sole developer; Costain Homes Inc. has executed a new agreement and submitted
new bonds reduced as appropriate per requested reduction for City Council acceptance.
Staff has inspected and verified the percentage of public improvements completed, and has
reviewed the status of water and sewer improvement with the several water districts (Eastern
Municipal Water District for sewers, Rancho California Water District for water). The Public
Works Department therefore recommends reduction of $1,356,875in the Faithful Performance
Bond amounts. The remaining amount is sufficient to cover both the remaining work and
provide the minimum warranty bond level of ten (10%) of the original Faithful Performance
bond amounts.
Therefore, it is appropriate to reduce the Faithful Performance Bond amounts as follows:
Street, Water, and Sewer Improvements.
$1,356,875
The subdivider is therefore submitting a replacement Faithful Performance Bond posted by the
new surety, American Motclrists Insurance Company, in the following reduced amount:
Streets, Water, and Sewer Improvements Bond No. 3SM 802 895 00 $730,625
The subdivider is also submitting replacement bonds in the full amount for the following items:
Labor and Materials
Bond No. 3SM 802 895 00
$1,043,750
Subdivision Monumentation
Bond No. 3SM 802 669 00
$40,000
There are no releases permitted in the Monumentation Bond or Labor and Materials Bond until
all work is completed or until the lien period following City Council acceptance of the
improvements has expired. All releases are authorized' by City Council action.
The affected streets, although not completed nor accepted, are Corte Palacio, Camino Casana,
and Via Balderama, and a portion of Butterfield Stage Road, Rancho Vista Road, Camino
Nunez, Corte Lapa,. and Via Vasquez.
Attachment:
Location Map
Replacement Public Improvement Bonds
Substitute Agreement
r:%agd rpt\94%O614\tr22915-21ac
TRACT -NO. 22_.915- 2
Location Map
ITEM NO. 13
APPROVAT .~
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFIC
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
City' Council/City Manager
/~ Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
DATE:
June 14, 1994
SUBJECT:
Substitute Subdivision Improvement Agreement and Public
Improvement Bond Riders in Tract No. 22916-2
PREPARED BY: 0~Albert Crisp, Permit Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council ACCEPT substitute Subdivision Improvement Agreement and riders to
Faithful Performance and Labor and Material Bonds for Street, Water, and Sewer
Improvements, and Subdivision Monumentation Bond Rider in Tract No. 22916-2, and DIRECT
the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Surety·
BACKGROUND:
On September 18, 1990,the City Council approved Tract Map No. 22916-2, and entered into
subdivision agreements with:
Tayco (Joint Venture of Taylor Woodrow Homes & Cosrain Homes, Inc.)
4921 Birch Street, Suite 110
Newport Beach, CA 92660
for the improvement of streets, installation of sewer and water systems, and subdivision
monumentation. Accompanying the subdivision agreements were surety bonds issued by
American Home Assurance Company as follows:
Bond No. PB 300 12 676 in the amount of $372,000to cover street improvements.
:
Bond No. PB 300 12 676 in the amount of $50,500 to cover water improvements.
3. Bond No. PB 300 12 676 in the amount of $56,000 to cover sewer improvements.
Bond No. PB 300 12 676 in the amount of $239,250 to cover labor and material for
street, water, and sewer improvements.
r:~agdrpt~94~0614~tr22916-2 06011ac
5. Bond No. PB 300 13 183 in the amount of $10,944 to cover subdivision
monumentation.
Effective December 31, 1993, Cosrain Homes Inc. withdrew from the joint venture
partnership. The name of the new partnership is Tayco, a California General Partnership
(comprised of Taylor Wood~ow Homes California Limited, a California Corporation, and Taylor
Woodrow Real Estate, a California Corporation). The new partnership has executed a new
agreement and submitted riders to the Bonds for City Council acceptance. The Surety and the
bond amounts remain the same. The riders reflect the change in principal.
The affected streets, although not completed nor accepted, are Corte Carmela and Via Reina,
and a portion of Meadows Parkway.
Attachment:
Location Map
Riders to Public Improvement Bonds
Substitute Agreement
r:~agdrpt~94\O614%tr22916-2 06011~
NoT To~_rA L ~
I;
~fo~ec_'t Site
~ PAUl4 ~OA~.
TRACT NO.
22916 - 2
Location Map
ITEM:NO. lz!-
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
June 14, 1994
Bond Reduction and Substitute Subdivision Improvement
Agreement and new Public Improvement Bonds in Tract No.
22915-3
PREPARED BY: ~'/A!bert Crisp, Permit Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council AUTHORIZE a fifty-three (53) percent reduction in Faithful Performance
Street, Water, and Sewer improvement bond amounts, ACCEPT the substitute Subdivision
Improvement Agreement and new Public Improvement Bonds in Tract No. 22915-3, and
DIRECT the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Surety.
BACKGROUND:
On May 8, 1990, the Riverside County Road Commissioner and Deputy Clerk of the Board of
Supervisors approved Tract No. 22915-3 'on behalf of the City of Temecula. Subdivision
Agreements and Surety Bonds were submitted by:
Tayco (Joint Venture of Taylor Woodrow Homes & Costain Homes, inc.)
4921 Birch Street, Suite 110
Newport Beach, CA 92660
for the improvement-of streets, installation of sewer and water systems, and subdivision
monumentation. Accompanying the subdivision agreements were surety bonds issued by
American Home Assurance Company as follows:
1. Bond No. PB 300 11 967 in the amount'of $907,000 to cover street improvements.
Bond No. PB 300 11 967 in the amount of $67,000 to cover water improvements.
Bond No. PB 300 11 967 in the amount of $110,000to cover sewer improvements.
Bond No. PB 300 11 967 in the amount of $542,000 to cover material and labor for
street, water, and sewer improvements.
r:\agdrpt~94~0614\tr22915-3 O6021ac
5. Bond No. PB 300 11 968 in the amount of $26,400 to cover subdivision
monumentation.
Effective December 31, 1993, Costain Homes Inc. withdrew from the joint venture
partnership. The subject Tract No. 22915-3 is one of three for which Cosrain Homes Inc. has
become the sole developer.' Costain Homes Inc. has executed a new agreement and submitted
Public Improvement Bonds reduced as appropriate per requested reduction for City Council
acceptance.
Staff has inspected and verified the amount of public improvements completed, and has
reviewed the status of water and sewer improvement with the several water districts (Eastern
Municipal Water District for sewers, Rancho California Water District for water). The Public
Works Department therefore recommends reduction of 8579,800 in the Faithful Performance
Bond Amounts. The remaining amount is sufficient to cover both the remaining work and
provide the minimum warranty bond level of ten percent (10%) of the original Faithful
Performance bond amounts.
Therefore, it is appropriate to reduce the Faithful Performance Bond amounts as follows:
Street, Water, and Sewer Improvements
$579,800
The subdivider is therefore submitting a replacement Faithful Performance Bond posted by the
new surety, American Motorists Insurance Company, in the following reduced amount:
Streets, Water, and Sewer
Bond No. 3SM 802 894 00
$504,200
The subdivider is also submitting replacement bonds in the full amount for the following items:
Labor and Materials
Bond No. 3SM 802 894 00
-$542,000
Subdivision Monumentation
Bond No. 3SM 802 670 00
$26,400
There are no releases permitted in the Monumentation Bond or Labor and Materials Bond until
all work is completed or until the lien period following City Council acceptance of the
Improvements has expired. All releases are authorized by City Council action.
The affected streets, although not completed nor accepted, are Corte Florecita, and a portion
of Meadows Parkway, Camino Nunez, and Camino De La Torre.
Attachment:
Location Map
ReplaCement Public Improvement Bonds
Substitute Agreement
r:%agdrpt~.94%0614\tr22915-3 O6021ec
'.'/
TRACT NO.
22915-5
Location Map
ITEM NO.
15
APPROV~r. ,~~
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICEI~ ~
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
June 14, 1994
Substitute Subdivision Improvement Agreement and Replacement
Public Improvement Bonds in Tract No. 22916-3
PREPARED BY: Of/Albert Crisp, Permit Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council ACCEPT substitute Subdivision Improvement Agreement and
replacement of Faithful Performance and Labor and Material Bonds for Street, Water and
Sewer Improvements, and Subdivision Monumentation Bond in Tract No. 22916-3, and
DIRECT the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Surety.
BACKGROUND:
On September 18, 1990, the City Council approved Tract Map No. 22916-3, and entered into
subdivision agreements with:
Tayco (Joint Venture of Taylor Woodrow Homes & Cosrain Homes, Inc.)
4921 Birch Street, Suite 110
Newport Beach, CA 92660
for the improvement of streets, installation of sewer and water systems, and subdivision
monumentation. ACcompanying the subdivision agreements were surety bonds issued by
American Home AssOrance Company as follows:
Bond No. PB 300 12 677 in the amount of $1,226,000to cover street improvements.
Bond No. PB 300 12 677 in the amount of $115,000 to cover water improvements.
3. Bond No. PB 300 12 677 in the amount of $139,000to cover sewer improvements.
e
Bond No. PB 300 12 677 in the amount of $740,000 to cover labor and material for
street, water, and sewer improvements.
r:~egdrpt~94~O614~tr22916-3 O6021ec
5. Bond No. PB 300 13 184 in the amount of $23,940 to cover subdivision
monumentation.
Effective December 31, 1993, Costain Homes Inc. withdrew from the joint venture
partnership. The subject Tract 22916-3 is one of three for which Cosrain Homes Inc. has
become the sole developer.' Costain Homes Inc. has executed a new agreement and submitted
new Bonds in the full amount in substitution for City Council acceptance. The new bonds are
posted by American Motorists Insurance Company as follows:
Faithful Performance Bond No. 3SM 802 784 00 for Streets, Water, and Sewer
Improvements in the amount of $1,480,000.
o
Labor and Materials Bond No. 3SM 802 78.4 00 for Streets, Water, and Sewer
Improvements in the amount of $740,000.
e
Subdivision Monument Bond No. 3SM 802 670 00 for Subdivision Monumentation in
the amount of $26,400.
The affected streets, although not completed nor accepted, are Corte Zamora and Camino
Merano, and a portion of Camino Nunez, Corte Parado, Pauba Road, and Butterfield Stage
Road·
Attachment:
Location Map
Replacement Bonds
Substitute Agreement
r:\agdrpt%94%0614\tr22916-3 06021ac
Zh,
-~, ZANO~A
~ pAUBA
TRACT NO.
22916
Location Ma.
ITEM 16
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Manager/City Council
Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
June 14, 1994
Award Bid to Remove Three (3) Desilting Ponds along with Debris
and Sediment in the Santiago Channel from Vallejo Avenue
to John Warner Road
PREPARED BY:
Brad Buron, Maintenance Superintendent
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council award bid for removal of sediment and three (3) desilting ponds in
Santiago Channel to Moody's Excavating, the lowest responsible bidder, for the sum of
$18,534.34.
BACKGROUND:
In May, 1994the Public Works Department in conformance with the City's current purchasing
procedures requested and received informal bids' from three (3) contractors for the following
scope of work:
e
e
Drain water (3 ponds)
Remove plastic and sand bags and dispose of legally
Excavate three (3) feet of silt and debris from entire length of channel (Vallejo
Avenue to John Warner Road)
Slopes ko be constructed two (2) to one (1) entire length of channel (Vallejo
Avenue to John Warner Road)
Clear and grub area between cha.nnel and Santiago Road for entire length of
channel .'
The bids received were as follows:
Moody's Excavating, Bonsall
Monteleone's Excavating, Murrieta
D.R. Schmidt Contractors, Homeland
$18,534.34
$23,400.00
$23,400.00
r:~egdrpt~94\0614\channel,bidlajp
Moody's Excavating has performed sub-contractor work in the past for the City of Temecula,
Public Works Department and we have found their work to be satisfactory.
The property owner allows the desilting ponds to be constructed each fall with the
understanding that each spring the property will be returned to a natural state. The
construction of the basins prevent large quantities of silt from entering the Vallejo Channel and
causing a significant maintenance problem. The installation and removal of the desiltation
ponds is more cost effective than removing silt from the Vallejo Channel.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Funds are available in the Public Works Department Drainage Facilities account 100-164-999-
5401 for the proposed work at Santiago Channel.
r:%agdrpt~94~0614~chennel.bidlajp
ITEM
17
APPROVAL ~
CITY A'r'rORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
/~d Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
June 14, 1994
Completion and Acceptance of the Pujol Street and First Street Street
Widening, Project No. PW92-09
PREPARED BY: ~ Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council accept the Pujol Street and First Street Street Widening, Project No.
PW92-09, as complete and direct the City Clerk to:
File the Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a one
(1) year Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract, and
Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after the filing of the
Notice of Completion if no liens have been filed.
BACKGROUND:
On November 23, 1993, the City Council awarded a contract for the Pujol Street and First
Street Street Widening, Project No. PW92-09, to IPS Services, Inc. for $73,393.31. The
project included installation of curb and gutter, sidewalk, pavement and street lighting along
the east side of Pujol Street from the Town Association to First Street.
The Contractor has completed the work in accordance with the approved plans and
specifications and within the allotted contract time to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
The construction retention for this project will be released thirty-five (35) days after the Notice
of Completion has been recorded.
r:~agdrpt%94~0614%pw92-O9 .eccleh
FISCAL IMPACT:
The contract amount for this project was ~73,393.31 with s contingency of $7,339.33. The
total cost of the project decreased by $499.79 due to the asphalt pavement, base material and
a.c. berm final quantities. The total construction cost was $72,893.52. This project is a
Capital Improvement Project and is being funded from Community Development Block Grant
(CDBG) funds.
Attachment:
Notice of Completion
Maintenance Bond
Contractor's Affidavit
r:~egdrpt~94\0614%p w92-09 .ecc/sh
RECORDING REQUESTED BY
AND RETURN TO:
CITY CLERK
CITY OF TEMECULA
43174 Bueinees P,,~k Drive
Temecula, CA 92690
SPACE
ABOVE THIS LINE FO~
RECORDER°S USE
NOTICE OF COMPLETION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT:
1. The City of Temecula is the owner of the property hereinafter described.
2. The full address of the City of Temecula is 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula,
California 92590.
3. A Contract was awarded by the City of Temecula to IPS Services, Inc. to perform the
following work of improvement:
PW92-09 Pujol St. & First St. Street Widening.
4. Said work was completed by said company according to plans and specifications and
to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works of the City of Temecula and that said work was
accepted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on June 14,
1994. That upon said contract the VIGILANT INSURANCE COMPANY, a New York corporation was
surety for the bond given by the said company as required by law.
5. The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the City of
Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, and is described as follows: PROJECT PW 92-09.
STREET.
The street address of said property is: INTERSECTION OF PUJOL STREET AND FIRST
Dated at Temecula, California, this _ day of
,1994.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA }
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE }
CITY OF TEMECULA )
ss
JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California and do hereby certify under penalty of
perjury, that the foregoing NOTICE OF COMPLETION is true and correct, and that said NOTICE OF
COMPLETION was duly and regularly ordered to be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder of
Riverside by said City Council.
;
Dated at Temecula, California, this day of , 1994.
JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk
FonndCIP-O01 Rev. 12-5-91 pwO4~ow92-O9\completn.not 040694
VIGILANT INSURANCE COMPANY
15 Mountain View Road, R O. Box 1615
Warren, New Jersey 07061-1615
MAINTENANCE
BOND
EXECUTED .IN TWO COUNTERPARTS
Bond No. 89400523-M
PREMIUM -NIL-
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that
IPS SERVICES , INC.
as Principal.
and VIGILANT 'INSURANCE COMPANY, a New York corporation. as Surety. are held and firmly bound
unto
CITY OF TEMECULA
as Obligee, in the sum of
SEVEN THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED EIGHTY-NINE AND 35/100--- Dollars
($ 7,28 9.35 ). for the payment of which sum, well and truly to be made, the Principal and Surety
bind themselves, their heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by
these presents.
WHEREAS the Principal has entered into a written contract dated NOVEMBER 23, 1993 with the Obligee for
ALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT
State of CALIFORNIA " m OPTIONAL SECTION
County o! RIVERSIDE
On.__~Y 3 1 1994 before me.
LYNN ItOLHZS, NOTARY PUBLIC
NAJdE, TITLE OF O~FICER E G 'JANE DOte. NOTARY PUBLIC'
' ELK:Z B.. HAGEN
personally appeared .AMiss, OF S,S.ER,S,
[] personally known to me - OR - [] proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence
Cornre. #946708
to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are
subscribed to the within instrument and ac-
knowledged to me that he/she/they executed
the same in his/her/their authorized
capacity(ies). and that by his/her/their
signature(s) on the instrument the person(s).
or the entity upon be.half of which the
person(s) acted. executed the instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
~ \ SIGN&TUR60~ NOTARY
OPTIONAL SECTION
CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER
Th:xj~ s~J~ute does nol reoA,.re the No~r Io
fill mn the data below. do,ng So may Drove
m'wakaal:~ek"'PlKla:ansreB/rq°rtlhecl°curnm~t
[] INDIVIDUAL
I'] CORPORATE. OFFICER(S)
TITLE(SI
[] PARTNER(S) [] LIMITED
[] GENEP~L
[] ATTORNEY-IN-FACT
[] TRUSTEE(S)
[] GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR
[] OTHER:
SIGNER IS REPRESENTING:
NAME OF PE~ISI OR ENTITYlIES)
THIS CERTIFICATE MUST BE ATTACHED TO TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT
THE 9OCUMENT DESCRIBED AT RIGHT:
NUMBER OF PAGES DATE OF DOCUMENT
· :-~,; ;,=,,e^! trauou,ena reanacnrnem Of rams formSIGNER(S} OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE
-
)
VIGILANT INSURANCE COMPANY
15 Mountain View Road. R O. Box 1615
Warren, New Jersey 07061-1615
MAINTENANCE BOND
EXECUTED IN TWO COUNTERPARTS
Bond No. 89400523-M
PREMIUM -NIL-
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that
IPS SERVICES, INC.
- - as Principal,
and VIGILANT INSURANCE COMPANY. a New York corporation, as Surety, are held and firmly bound
unto
CITY OF TEMECULA
as Obligee. in the sum of
SEVEN THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED EIGHTY-NINE AND 35/100--- Dollars
($ 7,28 9.3 5 ), for the payment of which sum, well and truly to be made, the Principal and Surety
bind themselves, their heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by
these presents.
WHEREAS the Principal has entered into a written contract dated NOVEMBER 23, ! 993 with the Obligee for
PROJECT NO. PW92-09, PUJOL STREET AND IST STREET STREET WIDENING
and
WHEREAS said Principal is required to post a bond to guarantee repair or replacement of faulty material or
workmanship for a period of one year from and after the date of acceptance of said work.
NOW, THEREFORE, if the said .Principal shall repair or replace any and all defects in said work during the
aforesaid period, then this obligation shall be void; otherwise to remain in full force and effect.
Signed, sealed and dated MAY 3 I, 1994
IPS
by//
SERVICES, INC.
="'/"'~ 't .:2 C3..g~ E"'
VIGILANT INSURANCE COMPANY
L;../
E'r.KE H. [-L~GEN / ""' Attorney in
POWER OF ATTORNEY
Men by these Presents, That the VIGILANT INSURANCE COMPANY, 15 Mountain View Road, Warren, New Jersey, a New York Corpora-
and appoinled, and does hereby constitute and appoint William R. Frtis, Marie E. Shreckengast and Elke H. Hagen
?ach its true and lawful Attorney-in-Fact to execute under such designation in its name and to ahrm its corporate seal to and deliver for and on its behalf as
-urety thereon or otherwise, bonds or oDligations given or executed in the course of its business, and consents for the release of retained percentages and/or
:nal estimates.
In WIlMM Whemf, Ihe stud VIGILANT INSURANC~ COMPANY It~. pufsumnl t~ its 8y-IJw~. c~u~e¢l the~e i~,~efta to be ~igaed by its V~ce-Presk~nl ~ Ashatom S~'fm~.~ and i~ corporme se~l ~, N
ereto Iffal~ IJ~ 19th d~y ~ November ~9 92
ZATE OF NEW JERSEY }
;ounly of Somerset ss.
VIGJLANT INSUR CE COMPANY
McCINIIn
Vicl.-Prw~Ment
O- me 19 th day o[ ~;ove=ber 19 92 . beim me meanally
~CE C~PANY. t~ ~tmtm ~ri~ in a~ ~h ex~ IM J~ P~r of ~.
~ ~GI~ INSURANCE COMPANY ~ k~ the ~ale ~al ~r~t; ~: me sen aff~ to
~ ~Oany. a~ trill he se~ ~ P~er of A~o~y u m~ml ~et~ of sa~ ~y
' ~d ~m~ny. ~ ~at the sagnature ot sa~ ~orge ~lellsn suo~nl to ud P~r of ~ey
TATE OF NEW JERSEY
ounty of Somerset
~E.RTIFICATION
AcknowM~ed ~ Sworn to betore me
3'AN'ET A. SCAVO,N"'~
Notary hbilc, St,,tc of New 3erley
.]';o. 206~520
Co~i.i~ ~pi~= O~o~t 2, 1994
I. me u~e~. ~tant ~ of ~ VIGI~NT INSURANCE C~PANY. do MFoDy ~ ~/r ~ ~ ~ I I~ ex~ ~ ~ 8~ of ~ ~ ~y M ~ ~ ~ ~d.of ~r~
~ JuM 13. 1974 ~
"~TIC~
in the Mm a~ on
desrq~t~. extol
for m ~m 3 ~, ~y exam ~ s~h ~. u~e~/q ~ ml ~a~ U p~e ~ s~ mlutm ~ ~ of a~.
~urm~rcer~Y~r~sa":~V1G~L'ANT~SU~-~C~C~M~ANYi~u~Y~iixn~d~1z~M1f~c~i~Y~nc~Mm~m~e~
:m mmryo~l~on'~&.ul. etc. lc~ef~mt~ot rm3umm~l byffie l~w,i ofthe UMeCl Sl~lel.
Andl~unt~c~rbhfm~NMmgemgPowe~o4A~mnowi~fulllocc~m~lefi~
CALIFORNIA
3 I ST MAY 94
~etrlD
O O
CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT AND FINAL RELEASE
PROJECT NO. PW92-09
PUJOL ST. & 1ST ST.
STREET WIDENING
This is to certify that TPS s~vIcss, 'rNC. ,(hereinafterthe"undersigned")
declares to the City of Temecula, under oath, tha:t it has paid in full for all materials, supplies,'
labor, services, tools, equipment, and all other bills contracted for by the undersigned or by any
of the undersigned's agents, employees or subcontractors used or in contribution to the execution
of its contract with the City of Temecula with regard to the building, erection, construction, or
repair of that certain work of improvement known'as PROJECT NO. PVV92-09, PUJOL ST. & 1ST
ST. STREET VVIDENING, situated in the City of Temecula, State of California, more particularly
described as follows:
Installation of curb and gutter, a.c. dike, sidewalk, a.c. driveway, access ramp, cross-gutter, A.C.
pavement and aggregate base and pavement removals, excavation and fill operations, and other
ancDlary works near and at the intersection of Pujol S~'eet and 1st Sl~eet-
The undersigned declares that it knows of no unpaid debts or claims arising Out of said
Contract which would constitute grounds for any third party to claim a stop notice of any unpaid
sums owing to the undersigned.
Further, for valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the
undersigned does hereby fully release and acquit the. City of Temecula and all agents and
employees of the City, and each of them, from any and all claims, debts, demands, or causes of
action which exist or might exist in favor of the undersigned by reason of the Contract executed
between the undersigned and the City of Temecula or which relate in any way to the work
performed by the undersigned with regard to the above-referenced construction project.
Further, the undersigned expressly acknowledges its awareness of, and waives the benefits
of, Section '1542 of the Civil Code of the State of California which provides: "A general release
· does not ex~end to claims which the 'creditor does not know or suspect to exist in his favor at the
time of executing the release, which if known by him must have materially effected his settlement
with the debtor."
This release is intended to be a full and general release of any and all claims which the
undersigned now has or may, in the future, have against the City of Temecula and/or its agents
and employees with regard to any matter arising from the construction of the above-referenced
project or the Contract between th'e City of Temecula and the Contractor with respect theretO,
whether such claims are now known or unknown or are suspected or unsuspected.
._
·
Dated: ~ 1, 1994
Signature "'
MIKE DOUCETTE, VICE-PRESIDENT
Print ~ame and Title
RELEASE R-1 pw01~pw92-O9%bidpkO 109593
ITEM NO. 18
TO,'
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
/l~Tim' D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
June 16, 1994
Solicitation of ConstructiOn Bids for the Installation of Traffic Signal and
Vehicle Pre-Emption Equipment, Project No. PW94-05
PREPARED BY:
Martin C. Lauber, Traffic Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council approve the Construction Plans and Specifications and authorize the
Public Works Department to solicit public construction bids for providing and installing Traffic
Signal Pre-Emption equipment at the intersections of Rancho California Road and Front Street,
Rancho California Road and Diaz Road, Margarita Road and Rancho Vista Road, Margarita
Road and Moraga Road, and the providing and installing of Vehicle Pre-Emption equipment on
nine (9) Fire Department vehicles. Project No. PW94-05.
BACKGROUND:
The plans, specifications and contract documents have been completed and the project is
ready to be advertised for construction bids. The project includes the installation of Traffic
Signal Emergency Pre-Emption equipment at four (4) signalized intersections and Vehicle
Emergency Pre-Emption equipment on nine (9) Fire Department vehicles. All vehicle mounted
Pre-Emption equipment (emitters) will be removable due to possible vehicle re-asignments.
With these installations the City will have a complete operating Emergency Pre-Emption
System. All signalized intersections within the City will be equipped with the exception of
Jefferson Avenue and Winchester Road, and Winchester Road and the I-15 ramps. These
intersections will be improved with Pre-Emption equipment in connection with the minor
Winchester Road widbning in August, 1994.
The Engineer's Estimate for the project is $43,1.22.00.
.,
FISCAL IMPACT:
This is a Capital Improvement Project and will be funded through Development Impact Fees.
-1- r:\agdrpt%94%0614%opticom.eiglajp
ITEM
19
APPROVAT .,~
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Manager/City Council
Tim D. Serlet, Director of'Public Works/City Engineer
June 14, 1994
Contract for Professional Services with C.M. "Max" Gilliss
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council approve and authorize the Mayor to execute the Professional Services
Agreement with C.M. "Max" Gilliss to act as a liaison between the City and government
agencies and special interest groups for an amount not to exceed $8,400.
BACKGROUND:
Staff has the opportunity to utilize the knowledge and experience of .Mr. Gilliss in facilitating
communication between various Special Districts, governmental agencies and individual or
community special interest groups and the City. Mr. Gilliss has specialized knowledge of the
Caltrans bureaucracy and established professional relationships with their management
personnel that will provide the City Staff greater. access to the decision makers. Mr. Gilliss
has also established a working relationship with existing City Staff.
Projects assigned to Mr. Gilliss will include transportation issues, and other matters as
designated by the City Manager. Mr. Gilliss will submit monthly status reports as provided
in Exhibit "A" of the attached contract.
The term of this co~ract will be from June 14, 1994to June 14, 1995. Mr. Gilliss will be
reimbursed at a rate o~ $70 per hour for services rendered and at the rate of $35 per hour for
travel time. Costs associated with this contract will not exceed $8,400. The contract may
be renewed at the option of the City Council.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Expenditures under this contract will be charged to Account No. 001-110-999-5248and will
not exceed $8,400.
r:\agdrpt~94%0614\gillis.egrlajp
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
This Agreement was made and entered into this 14th day of June, 1994, by and
between the City of Temecula ("City"), a municipal corporation, and C.M. 'Max' Gilliss, an
individual ("Consultant").
e
e
The parties hereto mutually agree as follows:
Services. COnsultant shall perform the tasks set forth in Exhibit "A" attached
hereto. Consultant shall complete the tasks according to the schedule set forth in
Exhibit "A".
Performance. Consultant shall at all times, faithfully, industrially and to the best of
his ability, experience and talent, perform all tasks described her.in.
Payment. The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, at the hourly rates set forth
in Exhibit "B" attached hereto, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks.
This amount will not exceed $ 8,400 for the total term of the Agreement unless
additional payment is approved by the City Council; provided that the City Manager
may approve additional payment not to exceed ten percent (10%) of the
Agreement; but in no event more than $10,000.00.
Consultant will submit invoices monthly for actual services performed. Invoices
shall be submitted on or about the first business day of each month, for services
provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of
receipt of each invoice.
Amendments. This Agreement may be amended so long as such amendment is in
writing and agreed upon by both the City Council and Consultant.
Ownership of Documents. Upon satisfactory completion of or in the event of
termination, suspension or abandonment of this Agreement, all original documents,
designs, drawings, and notes prepared in the course of providing the services to be
performed pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of the City
and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by the City without the
permission of the Consultant.
Termination. The City may terminate this Agreement without cause so long as
written notice of intent to terminate is given to Consultant at least three (3) days
prior to the termination date. In the event of termination, Consultant shall be paid
for the services performed.
Indemnification. The Consultant agrees to indemnify and save harmless the City,
its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and all claims,
demands, losses, defense cost, or liability of any kind or nature which the City, its
officers, agents and employees may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon
them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of
Consultant's acts or omissions under the terms of this Agreement, excepting only
liability arising out of the sole negligence of the City.
- 1 - r:\agmts\mester~gillis .egrlajp
10.
11.
Status of Consultant. Consultant is an independent contractor in 811 respects in the
performance of this Agreement and shall not be considered an employee of the City
for any purpose. No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in
connection with the performance of this Agreement.
Except as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other
compensation to Consultant for performing services hereunder for City. City shall
not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Consultant for injury or sickness
arising out of performing services hereunder.
Tqrm. This Agreement shall commence on June 14, 1994, and shall remain and
continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later
than June 14, 1995.
Default. In the event that Consultant is in default for cause under the terms of this
Agreement, the City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating
Consultant for any work performed after the date of default. Default shall include
not performing the tasks described herein to the reasonable satisfaction of the City
Manager of the City. Failure by the Consultant to make progress in the performance
of work hereunder, .if such failure arises out of causes beyond his control, and
without fault or negligence of the Consultant, shall not be considered a default.
Any disputes regarding performance, default or other matters in dispute between
the City and the Consultant arising out of this Agreement or breech thereof, shall
be resolved by arbitration. The arbitrator's decision shall be final.
Consultant shall select an arbitrator from a list provided by the City of three retired
judges of the Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services, Inc. The arbitration
hearing shall be conducted according to California Code of Civil Procedure Section
1280, et se~l. City and Consultant shall share the cost of the arbitration equally.
NoticeS. Notices shall be given pursuant to this Agreement by personal service on
the party to be notified, or by written notice upon such party deposited in the
custody of the United .States Postal Service addressed as follows:
a. City:
Attention: City Manager
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
'remecula, CA 92590
Consultant:
C.M. "Max" Gilliss
39561 Silverberry
Murrieta, CA 92562
The notices shall be deemed to have been given as of the date of personal service,
or three (3) days after the date of deposit of the same in the custody of the United
States Postal Service.
-2- r:~agmts~'naster%gillis .agrlajp
12.
Entire Agreement. This Agreement and any documents or instrument attached
hereto or referred to herein integrate all terms and conditions mentioned herein or
incidental heret0 supersede all negotiations and prior writing in respect to the
subject matter hereof.
In the event of conflict between the terms, conditions, or provisions of this
Agreement and any such document or instrument, the terms and conditions of this
Agreement shall prevail.
13.
LiabiliW. Except as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages,
or other compensation to Consultant for performing services hereunder for City.
City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Consultant for injury
or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder.
Consultant agrees to indemnify, release and hold harmless the City, its officers,
agents, employees, and representatives for all claims or losses the City may suffer
resulting from any negligent actions or omissions by Consultant.
Consultant shall secure workers' compensation insurance. Upon request of
Consultant, the City shall add Consultant to the City's workers' compensation
policy and the Consultant to the City's workers' compensation policy and the
Consultant shall reimburse the City for the cost of said insurance premiums.
14.
Licenses. Consultant and subconsultant shall obtain all necessary licenses,
including but not limited to, City Business Licenses.
The parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date and year above
written.
CONSULTANT
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
C.M. "Max" Gilliss
By
Ron Roberrs, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peter Thorson, City Attorney
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
-3- r:\agrnts\master\gillis .mgr/ajp
EXHIBIT "A"
TASKS TO BE PERFORMED
Consdtant v~ill perform tasks as assigned by the City Manager or his Designee in
areas, including, but not limited to local agency liaison, assistance with City, County, Special
Districts, State and Federal Agencies, as well as representation to individual, community and
special interest groups. The level of representation or investigation will be defined by the City
Manager or his designee, as well as the mission and scope of the tasks..
Consultant shall submit written memorandum progress reports to City as directed.
EXHIBIT "A" r:~agmts~master\gillis.agr/ajp
EXHIBIT "B"
PAYMENT SCHEDULE
Consultant shall submit itemized invoices monthly for actual services performed.
Invoices shall include an itemization of hours worked and services rendered.
Consultant shall be reimbursed at the rate of $70 per hour for services rendered and
at the rate of $35 per hour for travel time. Hours billed to the City shall not exceed eight
hours in a single day.
Except for assignments outside Riverside County, Consultant shall be responsible
for his own meals and travel expenses. Entertainment expenses incurred in connection with
the performance of Consultant'$ tasks shall be the responsibility of Consultant.
Consultant will utilize his own automobile in the performance of his duties and
provide necessary maintenance, service fuel, and insurance at no cost to the City.
Consultant shall furnish his own office, including secretarial services, computer,
copier, facsimile, telephone, beeper, answering service, and supplies.
EXHIBIT "B" r:\agmts\rnaster\gillis.agrlajp
ITEM 20
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Council/City Manager
FROM: ~'~2 Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
DATE: June 14, 1994
SUBJECT: Solicitation of Construction Bids for the Construction of a Temporary
Traffic Signal at Winchester and Nicolas Roads, Project No. PW93-11
PREPARED BY: ~,~-Martin C. Lauber, Traffic Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council approve the Construction Plans and Specifications and authorize the
Public Works Department to solicit public construction bids for the construction of a temporary
traffic signal on Winchester and Nicolas Roads, Project No. PW93-11
BACKGROUND:
The plans, specifications and contract documents have been completed and the project is
ready to be advertised for construction bids. The project is for the construction of a temporary
three-way traffic signal at the intersection of Winchester and Nicolas Roads.
These improvements are scheduled to be constructed by Assessment District 161. However,
the most ambitious estimate for the construction of these improvements to begin is the
summer of 1995, with a total construction time of 18 months.
The proposed temporary traffic signal project will provide interim traffic control at the
intersection of Winchester and Nicolas Roads until the ultimate improvements can be
constructed.
The Engineer's Estimate for the project is $78,900.00.
FISCAL IMPACT:
This is a Capital Improvement Project and will be funded through Development Impact Fees.
- 1 - r:\agdrpt%94%0614\temptraf,sig/ajp
ITEM NO.
21
APPR(~
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
June 14, 1994
Change of Zone No. 5570 - Johnson + Johnson a request for the
redesignation of three parcels .'from R-A-5 (Residential Agricultural, 5 acre
minimum parcel size) to R-3 (General Residential) and C-O (Commercial Office)
located at the northeast corner of Ynez and Rancho Vista Roads
Prepared By: Matthew Fagan, Assistant Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Commission recommends the City Council:
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 94-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DENYING
WITHOUT PREJUDICE CHANGE OF ZONE NO. 5570 - A REQUESTTO CHANGE
THE ZONE ON THREE PARCELS FROM R-A-5 (RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL
5 ACRE MINIMUM PARCEL SIZE) TO C-O (COMMERCIAL OFFICE) ON
PARCELS NO. I AND 3 AND FROM R-A-5 to R-3 (GENERAL RESIDENTIAL) ON
PARCEL NO. 2 ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE NORTHEASTERN CORNER
OF RANCHO VISTA AND YNEZ ROADS AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S
PARCEL NUMBERS 944-290-015,944-290-016,AND 944-290-017
BACKGROUND
The proposed project is a request for a re-zoning on three parcels; however, Parcel 2 (C-O:
Commercial Office) is not consistent with the General Plan Land Use designation of Medium
Density Residential (7-12 dwelling units per acre). Consequently, staff could not make the
necessary finding that the project is consistent with the City's General Plan. In addition, there
were several outstanding environmental issues regarding this property that had not been
.adequately addressed (traffic, drainage, biologica. I resources) in the environmental assessment.
The Planning Commission denied the project without prejudice by a 4-0 vote at their May 2,
1994 meeting (Commissioner Salyer was absent). Two (2) adjacent residents spoke in
support of staff's recommendation for denial without prejudice. Their concerns were based
more on development of the site rather than the change of zone request. Staff also received
one letter from a resident who was of the same opinion as the speakers. Following the
Planning. Commission meeting, one additional letter has been received by Staff in support of
staff's recommendation for denial without prejudice for the project (reference Attachment No.
R:\STAFFRPT\SSTOCZ,CC 6/6/9/,, ktb 1
4). The applicant was not at the Planning Commission meeting and there was no Commission
discussion on this item.
FISCAL IMPACT
None.
Attachments:
2.
3.
4.
Resolution No. 94- - Page 3
Planning Commission Staff Report: May 2, 1994- Page 6
Planning Commission Minutes: May 2, 1994- Page 7
Letter to Staff - Page 8
R:\STAFFRPT\SST0CZ.CC 6/6/9~ ktb 2
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
RESOLUTION NO. 94-
R:\STAFFRPT\S570CZ,CC 6/6/9~ klb 3
ATrACttMENT NO. 1
RESOLUTION NO. 94-
A RESOLUTION OF ~ CITY COUNCIL OF TBT. CITY OF
TEMECLL~ DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE CHANGE OF ZONE NO,
5570 - A REQUEST TO CHANGE ~ ZONE ON TIIREE PARCI~.LS
FROM R-A-5 (RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL .5 ACRE MINIMUM
PARCEL SIZE) TO C-O (COMIV~.RC~ OFFICE) ON PARCELS NO, 1
AND 3 AND FROM R-A-5 to R-3 (GENERAL RESIDENTIAL) ON PARCvJ.
NO, 2 ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT ~ NORTBv. ASTERN CORNER
OF RANCHO VISTA AND YNT.7. ROADS AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S
PARCI~.L NUMBERS 944290-015, 944-290-016, AND 944-290-017
WHEREAS, Johnson + Johnson fled Change of Zone No. 5570 in accordance with the
City of Temecula General Plan and Riverside County Land Use and Subdivision Ordinances,
which the City has adopted by reference;
WItE~, Change of Zone No. 5570 was processed in the time and manner prescribed
by State and local hw;
WH'EREAS, the Planning Commission considered Change of Zone No. 5570 on May
2, 1994, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time interested persons
had an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition;
WttEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, the Commission
recommended denial without prejudice of Change of Zone No. 5570;
WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a public hearing pertaining to Change of Zone
No. 5570 on June 14, 1994, at which time interested persons had opportunity to testify either
in support or opposition to Change of Zone No. 5570;
WHEREAS, the City Council received a copy of the Commission proceedings and Staff
Report regarding Change of Zone No. 5570;
NOW, TltF. REFORE, ~ CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Findings.
,°
A. The City council in denying the proposed Change of Zone, makes the following
findings, to wit:
1. The land use or action is not consistent with the City's General Plan. The
project is not consistent with the General Plan Land Use Designation for the site. The project
is a request for a redesignation of the zoning on three parcels; however, Parcel 2 (C-O:
R:\STAFFRPT\S570CZ.CC 6/6/9~ ktb 4
Commercial Office) is not consistent with the General Plan Land Use designation of Medium
Density Residential (7-12 dwelling units per acre).
Section 2. Environmental Compliance. This project is a Statutory exemption per Article
18, Section 15270 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines. This Exemption
states: "CEQA does not apply to projects which a public agency rejects or disapproves."
Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution.
Section 4. PASSED, APPROVED'AND ADOFrED this 14th day of June, 1994.
ATTEST:
RON ROBPATS
MAYOR
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFOR~A)
COUNT~ OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA)
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 14th day of June,
1994 by the following vote of the Commission:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
CO~CILMEMBERS:
CO~C~ERS:
CO~CIINEMBERS:
JUNE S. GI~:
CITY CLERK
R:\STAFFRPT\SS70CZ.CC 6/6/9/, ktb 5
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT: MAY 2, 1994
R:\STAFFRPT\5570CZ.CC 6/6/94 ktb 6
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
May 2, 1994
Change of Zone No. 5570
Prepared By: Matthew Fagan, Assistant Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Department Staff recommends the Planning
Commission:.
ADOPT Resolution No. 94 - _ recommending denial of
Change of Zone No. 5570 based upon the Analysis and
Findings contained in the Staff Report
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT:
Johnson + Johnson
REPRESENTATIVE:
Johnson + Johnson
PROPOSAL:
Change of zone request for three parcels from R-A-5
(Residential Agricultural, 5 acre minimum parcel size) to R-
3 (General Residential) and C-O (Commercial Office).
LOCATION:
Northeast corner of Ynez and Rancho Vista Road
EXISTING ZONING:
R-A-5 (Residential Agricultural, 5 acre minimum parcel
size)
SURROUNDING ZONING:
North:
South:
East:
West:
Specific Plan No. 180 (Rancho Highlands)
and R-3 (General Residential)
R-1 (One-Family Dwellings)
R-2 (Multiple Family Dwellings)
Specific Plan No. 180 (Rancho Highlands)
PROPOSED ZONING:
R-3 (General Residential) and C-O (Commercial Office)
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION:
Medium Dens!ty Residential for Parcel 1 (APN 944-290-
015) and Par~:el 2 (APN 944-290-017)and Professional
Office for Parcel 3 (APN 944-290-016)
EXISTING LAND USE:
Vacant
R:\STAFFRPT~5570CZ.PC 4/28/94 kJb
SURROUNDING LAND USES:
North:
South:
East:
West:
Sales Information Center, Lake and Church
Vacant, Single-Family Residences
Apartments
Vacant, Apartments
PROJECT STATISTICS
Parcel No. 1: I 1.4 acres
Parcel No. 2: 8.8 acres
Parcel No. 3: 8.0 acres
Total Area: 28.2 acres
BACKGROUND
Change of Zone No. 5570 was submitted to the Riverside County Planning Department on
August 18, 1989. The request at that time was for a Change of Zone for three contiguous
properties from R-A-5 (Residential Agricultural, 5 acre minimum parcel size) to C-P-S (Scenic
Highway Commercial). The case was transferred to the City of Temecula in May 1990. A
Development Review Committee (DRC) meeting was held on March 12, 1992. The request
was changed on March 23, 1992 from R-A-5 to C-O (Commercial Office) on two of the
parcels and to R-3 (General Residential) on the third parcel. The applicant received comments
from the Planning Department and the application was again deemed incomplete because
several items needed to by submitted to Staff in order to continue processing the application.
The applicant requested that the application be put on hold on December 16, 1992, until the
General Plan was adopted. Upon adoption of the General Plan, Staff sent out two letters
providing direction to the applicant-and establishing time frames for the applicant to contact
Staff (reference Attachment No. 3). The applicant was told in the letters that failure to
contact Staff would result in their application being scheduled for a public hearing with a
recommendation for denial without prejudice. Staff was never contacted by the applicant;
therefore, the item is now before the Planning Commission for their consideration.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
· Change of Zone No. 5570 is a request to change the zoning on three parcels from R-A-5
(Residential Agricultural, 5 acre minimum parcel size) to R-3 (General Residential) and C-O
(Commercial Office).
ANALYSIS
The project was deemed incomplete in a letter to the applicant dated March 23, 1992.
Outstanding issues included a focused traffic analysis, a letter to indicate the project's
placement within CFD 88-12 and the assessment the applicant had been paying to the
assessment district and revised exhibits for the .~hange of zone. These items were never
submitted to Staff.
This project was put on hold at the request of the applicant pending adoption of the City's
General Plan. Upon the adoption of the Plan, the applicant was sent correspondence providing
direction to take action on the dormant case. The change of zone request is consistent with
the General Plan for Parcel No. I (R-3: General Residential) and Parcel No. 3 (C-O:
Commercial-Office). The change of zone request for Parcel 2 (C-O: Commercial Office) is not
R:\STAFFRPT%55?OCZ.PC 4/28/94 klb 2
consistent with the General Plan. It is because of this inconsistency with the City's General
Plan that the project is before the Planning Commission with a recommendation of denial.
EXISTING ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION
Existing zoning on ti~e site is R-A-5 (Residential Agricultural, 5 acre minimum parcel size). The
General Plan designation for the site is Medium Density Residential for Parcels 1 (APN 944-
290-015) and 2 (APN 944-290-017),and Professional Office for Parcel 3 (APN 944-290-016).
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
This project is a Statutory exemption per Article 18, Section 15270 of the California
Environmental Quality Act Guidelines. This Exemption states: "CEQA does not apply to
projects which a public agency rejects or disapproves."
SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS
The project was deemed incomplete in a letter to the applicant dated March 23, 1992. The
requested items were never submitted to Staff. The project is a request for a redesignation
of the zoning on three parcels; however, Parcel 2 (C-O: Commercial Office) is not consistent
with the General Plan Land Use designation of Medium Density Residential (7-12dwelling units
per acre). Staff cannot make the necessary finding that the project is consistent with the
City's General Plan.
FINDINGS
The land use or action is not consistent with the City's General Plan. The change of
zone request for Parcel 2 is not' consistent with the General Plan. The General Plan
Land Use Designation for this Parcel is Medium Density Residential (7-12 dwelling units
per acre). The applicant is requesting that the zoning for this Parcel be Commercial
Office.
Attachments:
PC Resolution - Blue Page 4
Exhibits - Blue Page 7
A. Vicinity Map
B. Zoning Map
C. Site Plan
Letters to applicant - Blue Page 8
R:\STAFFRPT~5570CZ,PC 4/28/94 Idb 3
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
PC RESOLUTION NO. 94-
R:\STAFFRP'T~5570CZ.PC 4./28/94 klb
4
ATrA~ NO. 1
PC RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF ~ PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING DENIAL OF
CHANGE OF ZONE NO. 5~70 - A REQUEST TO CHANGE
Tn'R ZONE' ON Tn'RRI,. PARCRI,S FROM R-A-5
(RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL 5 ACRE MINIMUM
PARCRL SIZE) TO C-O (COMMERC~ OFFICE) ON
PARCELS NO. 1 AND 3 AND FROM R-A-5 to R-3
(GENERAL KESlDENTI~).ON PARCRL NO. 2 ON
PROPERTY LOCATED AT ~ NORTh. ASTERN
CORNER OR RANCHO VISTA AND YNEZ ROADS AND
KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMB~ 944-290-015,
944-291)-016, AND 944-290-017
WItEREAS, Johnson + Johnson fried Change of Zone No. 5570 in accordance with the
City of Temecula General Plan and Riverside County Land Use and Subdivision Ordinances,
which the City has adopted by reference;
WItF. REAS, Change of Zone No. 5570 was processed in the time and manner prescribed
by State and local law;
WItF. REAS, the Planning Commission considered Change of Zone No. 5570 on May
2, 1994, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time interested persons
had an opportunity to testify either in support or in opposition;
WttEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and
arguments, ff any, of all persons deserving to be heard, the Commission considered all facts
relating to Change of Zone No. 5570;
NOW, TH'EREFORE, TFrE PLANNING COMMISSION OF TH'R CITY OF
TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETER1MINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Th.at the above recitations are true and correct.
Section 2. Findings.
A. The Planning Commission in recbmmending the City Council deny Change of
Zone No. 5570, makes the following finding, to wit:
1. The land use or action is not consistent with the City's General Plan. The
project is not consistent with the General Plan I_and Use Designation for the site.
R:\STAFFRPT~5570CZ.PC 4/28/94 klb 5
Section 3. Environmental Compliance. This project is a Statutory exemption per Article
18, Section 15270 of the C~llfomia Enviromental Quality Act Guidelines. This Exemption
states: "CEQA dogs not apply to projects which a public agency rejects or disapproves."
Section 4. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOFIll) this 2nd day of May, 1994.
STEVEN I. FORD
CHAIRMAN
I HEI~RY CERTIFY that the foregoing Re,solution was duly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 2nd day of May,
1994 by the following vote of the Commission:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
GARY THORNI-TrT-T,
SECRETARY
R:\STAFFRPTX5570CZ.PC 4/28/94 klb 6 .-
AI'I'ACHMENT NO. 2
EXHIBITS
R:',STAFFRPT'%5570CZ.PC 4;28/94 klb 7
CITY OF 'TEMECULA
SI
R0
CASE NO.: A
EXHIBIT: CHANGE OF ZONE NO. 5570
P.C. DATE: MAY 2, 1994
//
VICINITY MAP
R:',STAFFRPT",5570CZ.PC 4/21/94 klb
BP
OS
EXHIBIT B
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION:
CITY OF TEMECULA
CC
MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL AND PROFESSIONAL OFFICE
EXHIBIT C
ZONING DESIGNATION:
R-A5 (RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL - 5 ACRE MINIMUM PARCEL SIZE)
CASE NO.: CHANGE OF ZONE NO. 5570
P.C. DATE: MAY 2, 1994
R:\STAFFRP'R5570CZ.PC 4121/94 klb
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
LETTERS TO APPLICANT
R:\STAFFRPT%SSTQCZ.PC 4/28/94 klb- 8
C of Temecula
·'\'~'.~ ~ 43174 Business Park Drive · Temecula, California 92590
March 14, 1994
(9091 694-1989 · FAX (909) 694-1999
Mr. Dean Allen
Johnson + Johnson
27540 Ynez Road, Suite 200
Temecula, CA 92591
SUBJECT:
Status of Change of Zone No. 5570 - located on the northeast comer of Ynez
and Rancho Vista Roads
Dear Mr. Alien:
Correspondence sent to you on December 15, 1993, and February 22, 1994 (see attached)
requested that you contact Staff to provide a status of your project. This same
correspondence informed you that failure to contact Staff would result in your project being
scheduled for a public hearing with a recommendation of denial without prejudice. The
above referenced project has been placed on the April 4, 1994 Planning Commission
Agenda.
If you have any questions regarding this notification, please contact me at (909) 694-6400.
fely,
cc: Ray Casey, Department of Public Works
R:\PL_~NN'ING'~570C'7,PC. LTR 1114/94 sr*!
C of Temecula
· \~'~ 43174 Business Park Drive · Temecula. Californma g25gO
February 22, 1994
1909] 6c)4-1989 · FAX 19091
Mr. Dein Allen
Johnson + Johnson
27540 Ynez Road, Suite 200
Temecula, CA 92591
SUB/ECT:
Status of Change of Zone No. 5570 - located on the northeast comer of Ynez and
Rancho Vista Roads
Dear Mr. Allen:
This letter shall serve as a follow-up to the letter dated December 15, 1993· That letter
provided direction relative to the above referenced project. planning Staff cannot support your
request for a change of zone. Staff is unable to make a finding that the change of zone request
is consistent with the City's General Plan. The following are options which are available to you
at the current time:
You may provide Staff with a written request to withdraw the change of zone request and
be entitled to a partial refund of fees paid for the processing of the application.
You may provide Staff with a written request to modify your change of zone request,
making it consistent with the Genera/Plan. Staff will continue processing the change of
zone request at that time.
You may provide Staff with a written request to proceed with the processing with the
change of zone application without modifying your request. Staff's-recommendation for
the project to the Planning Commission will be to deny the project.
If Staff does not receive'any correspondence from you within ten (10) calendar days from the
date of this letter, the case will be scheduled for a public hearing with a recommendation of
denial without prejudice.
R:\PL,ANNING~570C'LLT2 2/15/94 klb
Page 2
Mr. Alien
-CZ 5570
If you have any questions or comments, please call me at (909) 694-6400.
w
cc: Ray Casey, Depaximent of Public Works
R:\PLANNl~GtSI"/0CT.,LT'2 lt1~94 k.lb
City of Temecula
19 43174 Business Parl~ Drive · Temecula. California 92590
December 15, 1993
1909) 694-1989 · FAX (90c)1 694-
Mr. Dean Allen
Johnson + lohnson
27540 Ynez Road, Suite 200
Temecula, CA 92591
SUBJECT: . Slams of Change of Zone No. 5570 - located on the northeast comer of Ynez and
Rancho Vista Roads
Dear Mr. Allen:
This letter shall serve to provide direction relative to the above referenced project. The
Temecula City Council adopted the City's General Plan on November 9, 1993. A Land Use
Plan was approved that placed a land use designation on each parcel of land within the City.
The Land Use desi~nation for Parcel 1 (A.P.N. 944-290-015) is Medium Density Residential,
Parcel 2 (A.P.N. 944-290-017) is Medium Density Residential and Parcel 3 (A.P.N. 944-290-
016) is Professional Office. Your change of zone request is General Residential for Parcel 1,
Commercial Office for Parcel 2 and Commercial-Office for Parcel 3. The change. of zone
request for Parcel 2 is not consistent with the Land Use Plan. Therefore, Planning Staff cannot
support your request for a change of zone. Staff is unable to make a finding that the change of
zone request.is consistent with the City's General Plan. The following are options which are
available to you at the current time:
You may provide Staff with a written request to withdraw the change of zone request and
be entitled to a pamal refund of fees paid for the processing of the application.
You may provide Staff with a written request to modify your change of zone request,
m'aking it consistent with the General Plan. Staff will continue processing the change of
zone request at that time.
You may provide Staff with a written request to proceed with the processing with the
change of zone application without modifyilig your request. Staff's recommendation for
the project to the Planning Commission will be to deny the project.
If Staff does not receive any correspondence from you within ten (10) calendar days from the
date of this letter, the case will be scheduled for a public hearing with a recommendation of
denial without prejudice.
R:\SXPI..A.N'NI/qG~570C'Z. LTR 12115/93 klb
Page 2
Mr. Allen
CZ 5570
If you have any questions or comments, please call me at (909) 694-6400.
Sincerely,
cc: Ray Casey, Department of Public Works
R:~XPLA,N'I,C~7~.L~ 1~/14/93 ~
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES: MAY 2, 1994
R:\STAFFRPT\5570CZ.CC 61619~ ktb 7
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 4 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Fahey, Hoagland, Ford
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: I COMMISSIONERS: Salyer
PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
PCMIN05/02/1994
MAY 02, 1994
Chanae of Zone No. 5570
Proposed change of zone request for three parcels from R-A-5 to R-3 and C-O.
Located at the northeast corner of Ynez and Rancho Vista Road.
Assistant Planner Matthew Fagan presented the staff report. He advised the
Commission he has received one letter in support of staff's recommendation from
Sandra Foreman.
Chairman Ford opened the public hearing at 6:30 P.M.
Karel Lindemans, 42740 Las Violetas, Temecula, president of the County
Community Homeowners Association, expressed his support of the staff
recommendation for denial. Mr. Lindemans said Ynez and Rancho Vista Roads need
to be widened and the property is not suitable for development.
Judy Moramarco, 29761 Camino Del Sol, Temecula, expressed concern regarding
the existing traffic congestion and problems on Rancho Vista Road.
It was moved by Commissioner Fahey, seconded by Commissioner Blair to close the
public hearing at 6:35 P.M. and Adopt Resolution No. 94-06 recommending denial
of Change of Zone No. 5570 based 'upon' the Analysis and Findings contained in the
staff report.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 4 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Fahey, Hoagland, Ford
NOES: b COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: I COMMISSIONERS:. Salyer
:
Public Use Permit No. 6, Amendment No. 5
Proposed church and day school located on the southeast corner of Calle Girasol
and Tommy Lane.
3 05/11/94
ATTACHMENT NO. 4
LETTER TO STAFF
R:\STAFFRPT\5570CZ.CC 6/6/9~ ktb 8
1409 Via Gabriel
Palos Verdes Estates,
CA 90274
May 18, 1994.
RECEIVED
MAY 2 5
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
Gentlemen or Mesdames:
SUBJECT: Change of zone 5570
As a nearby homeowner, I am writing in opposition to
the proposed change of zoning at the northeast corner
of Ynez Road and Rancho Vista Road.
It is my feeling that this area should be preserved
as a residential neighborhood.
Many other sites within a mile or two are available
for commercial development, and the Johnson's should
place their commercial buildings there.
I will appreciate the City Council voting "No" on
this zoning change.
Very sincerely,
Sandra Forman
Owner of.42720 Las Violettas Court
Temecula
ITEM N O. 2 2
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Council/City Manager
Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning
June 14, 1994
Appeal of Planning Application Nos. 93-0157 and 94-0002 (Temecula Valley
Unified School District Maintenance, Operation and Transportation Facility and
Associated Environmental Impact Report)
PREPARED BY:
RECOMMENDATION:
Saied Naaseh, Associate Planner
The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council:
Adopt a resolution entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
UPHOLDING PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION TO APPROVE PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. 93-0157, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, TO ALLOW THE
CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF A TRANSPORTATION,
ADMINISTRATION AND MAINTENANCE FACILITY FOR THE TEMECULA
VALLEY UNIFIED SCHQOL DISTRICT.
Adopt a resolution entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
CERTIFYING ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. 94-0002), ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENTS OF
OVERRIDING CONSIDERATION AND APPROVING THE MITIGATION
MONITORING PROGRAM ON PROPER'I~.' LOCATED NORTH OF WINCHESTER
ROAD AND WEST OF THE EXTENSION OF RORIPAUGH ROAD AND KNOWN
AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 911-180-024.
R:\STAFFRPT~157PA93.CC 618194 klb
BACKGROUND
On May 2, -1994the Plannihg Commission certified the Environmental Impact Report (Planning
Application No. 94-0002)for Planning Application No. 93-0157 and approved Planning
Application No. 93-0157, a Conditional Use Permit, to allow the construction and operation
of a transportation, administration and maintenance facility for the Temecula Valley Unified
School District. The facility includes storage of school buses (with no more than 29 buses
operational on-site and off-site) and maintenance vehicles, fuel and wash islands, bus repair
bays, repair shops for maintenance operations and administrative offices. The project is
located north of WincheSter Road and west of the extension of Roripaugh Road. The Planning '
Commission approved the project with a 3-1 vote. Chairman Ford voted against the project
and Commissioner Salyer was absent. Chairman Ford felt the site was not centrally located
within the district and would result in increased traffic. He also had a concern that the site
is within a dam inundation area.
Two nearby homeowners spoke in opposition of the project. The concerns included increased
traffic on Margarita Road, which will result in difficult turning movements to and from Rustic
Glen; the inappropriateness of the proposed use, which they felt is an industrial use and
industrial uses should be located on the west side of the freeway, not adjacent to a residential
area; the degradation of the nearby property values; unmitigated air quality and noise impacts;
and the school district's under-estimation of the ultimate number of buses which will become
necessary as the number of students increase.
The Planning Commission's decision was appealed by Councilman Mu~oz at the May 10,
1994 City Council meeting as a result of a homeowner's (Michelle Bedard) request. She
indicated that the project should not be located in a residential area and should be built either
on the west side of the freeway or in the industrial park behind the library. Moreover, she
questioned the school district's claims that the proposed facility will be adequate for the
ultimate build-out of the district's boundary by presenting the City Council with the number
of bused students from the Poway, Vista, and Oceanside School Districts.
DISCUSSION
This project has been in the planning process since August of 1993.. This lengthened review
period was necessary to insure that all of the project impacts were addressed by the
preparation of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR). In addition, the School District desired
to receive the support of the nearby residents in the Winchester Creek and Roripaugh Hills
tracts. The school district hand delivered approximately 900 notices to the homeowners
within these two tracts inviting them to a community meeting on October 13, 1993. Only 12
people attended that meeting (refer to Attachment 4). In addition, these two tracts were
notified of the May 2, 1994 Planning Commission meeting, again with approximately 900
notices being mailed by City staff. Only two (2) homeowners were present at the Planning
Commission meeting for this project,
The school district has indicated that
from approximately 10,000 students
According to the school district, this
the number of students within the district will increase
to approximately 20,000 students in 10 to 15 years.
facility will be sufficient to handle the increased load.
Moreover, as the student population is increased and more schools are built to serve these
students, more students will be able to walk to schools because of their closer proximity to
homes. This will reduce the need for busing.
R:~STAFFRPT~.157PA93.CC 6RI94 klb 2
The environmental impacts of this project including traffic, air quality and noise impacts were
analyzed in the EIR. All of these impacts were reduced to insignificant levels with the
exception of air quality, hydrology, seismic safety and land use through mitigation measures
placed on the project. In terms of air quality, the construction and grading of the project
resulted in significant unmitigatable impacts in that the amount of Nitrogen Oxide emitted into
the air was greater than the threshold set by the Air Quality Management District. Therefore,
a Statement of Overriding Consideration was prepared.
FISCAL IMPACT
None
Attachments:
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Resolution No. 94- - Page 4
Resolution No. 94- - Page 8
Planning Commission Minutes of May 2, 1994 - Page 11
Planning Commission Staff Report of May 2, 1994- Page 12
School District Letter, Community Meeting - Page 13
Fee Checklist - Page 14
R:\STAFFRIr~157PA93.CC 6/7/94 'klb 3
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
RESOLUTION NO. 94-
R:\STAFFR.P~I57PA93.CC 6r'//c)4 IrJb 4
ATTA~ NO. 1
RESOLUTION NO. 94-
A RESOLUTION OF 'rv~. CITY COUNCH., OF ~ CITY OF
TE1VIE~ UPHOLDING PLANNING COMlVH.~SION'S DECISION TO
APPROVE PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 93-0157, A CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT, TO ALLOW ~ CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF
A TRANSPORTATION, ADMINISTRATION AND MAINTENANCE
FACILITY FOR TF!'F. TEMECULA VALLEY UNWw. r} SCHOOL
DISTRICT.
WI:!'F.~, Councilman Mu~oz filed an appeal of the Planning Commission' s decision
to certify the Environmental Impact Report (Planning Application No. 94-0002) for Planning
Application No. 93-0157 and to approve Planning Application No. 93-0157 in accordance with
the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City
has adopted by reference;
WI:[F. REAS, said Appeal application was processed in the time and manner prescribed
by State and local law;
WI-W~REXS, the City Council conducted a public hearing pertaining to said Appeal on
June 14, 1994, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support
or opposition to said Appeal; and
WHEREAS, the City Council received a copy of the Staff Report regarding the Appeal;
NOW, TH'F. REFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF TI:FF. CITY OF TEMECULA
DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1.
findings:
Findings. That the Temecula City Council hereby makes the following
to wit:
The City Council in denying the Appeal, makes the following additional findings,
1. The land use or action proposed is consistent with the General Plan. The
land use designation for the site is identified in the General Plan as BP (Business Park) which
encourages uses such as: light manufacturing, re~earch and development, wholesale business,
professional offices, storage and industrial supply.
R:\STAFFRP~I57PA93.CC 618194 klb 5
2. The provisions contained in Ordinance No. 348 allow for construction and
operation of ~ project prp_vi_d~ that a conditional use permit is granted.
3. The proposed use or action complies with all other requirements of state
law and local ordinances. The proposed use complies with California Governmental Code
Section 65360 and Section 18.28 (Conditional Use Permit) of Ordinance No. 348.
4. The proposed project will not be detrimental to the health, safety or
general weftare of the community. In addition, the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) prepared
for this project mitigates all significant impacts of the pwposed project to an insignificant level
with the exception of Hydrology, Seismic Safety, Air Quality and Land Use impacts for which
Statements of Overriding Considerations have been prepared. Mitigation measures have been
included in the Conditions of Appwval.
5. The site is suitable to accommodate the proposed land use in terms of the
size and shape of the lot configuration, access, and intensity of use, because the proposed
planning application (conditional use permit), as conditioned, complies with the standards
contained within the City's General Plan and Ordinance No. 348.
6. The project has acceptable access to a dedicated fight-of-way via an
casement which is open to, and useable by, vehicular traffic. Access to the project site is from
a publicly maintained road (Margarita Road).
7. The design of the project and the type of improvements are such that they
are not in conflict with easements for access through or use of the property within the proposed
project.
8. Said fmdings are supported by maps, exhibits and environmental
documents associated with these applications and herein incorporated by reference. The
proposed action is consistent with the City's General Plan.
Section 2. Environmental Compliance. An initial study was completed for the project
by Planning staff which indicated that there would be potentially significant impacts with the
development of the project. Consequently, staff determined that an Environmental Impact
Report would be necessary for the project. Environmental Impact Report No. 94-0002 was
prepared by the applicant's consultant, Douglas Wood and Associates, Inc. and was reviewed
by City staff. The Environmental Impact Report analyzed the significance of all the 'impacts and
proposed mitigation ineasures included in the final EIR that reduced these impacts to an
insignificant level with the exception of Seismic Safety, Climate and Air Quality, Hydrology and
Land Use for which Findings of Fact and Statements of Overriding Considerations have been
included within the final I:~R. Therefore, ~he City of Temecula Certifies the Final
Environmental Impact Report (PA 94-0002) which includes the Draft EIR, the Response to
Comments, the Mitigation Monitoring Program, Findings of Fact and Statements of Overriding
Considerations, the Staff Report and any associated attachments, and'finds that it has been
completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
R:\STAFFRPT~I57PA93.CC 617/94 klb 6
Section 3.
PASSED, APPROVED AND AI)O~ this 14th day of June, 1994.
RON ROBERTS
MAYOR
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA)
I ItKREBY CERTWY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City
Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 14th day of June,
1994 by the following vote of the Council:
AYES:
COUNCILMEMBERS
NOES:
COUNCII_A/IEMBERS
JUNE S.
CITY Ct,FRK
R:XSTAFFRFIl157PA93.CC 6/7/94 klb 7
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
RESOLUTION NO. 94-
R:\STAFFR.F~I.57PA93.CC 6/7/94 klb ~
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
RESOLKYHON NO. 94-
A RESOLUTION OF TFrF. CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY OF
TEMECUIA CERTIFYING ENVIRO~AL IMPACT RI~-PORT
(PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 94-0002), ADOPTING FINDINGS OF
FACT AND STATEMENTS OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATION AND
APPROVING Tiff, MITIGATION MONITORING'PROGRAM ON
PROPERTY LOCATED NORTH OF WINCHF-STER ROAD AND WEST
OF TB'F~ EXTENSION OF RORIPAUGH ROAD AND KNOWN AS
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 911-180.-024.
WItEREAS, Douglas Woods and Associates tompie. ted Environmental Impact Report
(Planning Application No. 94-0002) in accordance with the Riverside County, City of Temecula
and State CEQA Guidelines;
WHEREAS, said g!R application was processed in the time and manner prescribed by
State and local law;
WH"EREAS, the City Council considered said EIR on June 14, 1994, at which time
interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition;
W!tEREAS, at the conclusion of the City Council hearing, the City Council Certified
said F/R, Adopted the Findings of Fact and Statements of Overriding Consideration and
Approved the Mitigation Monitoring Program;
NOW, TFFEREFORE, THE CITY OF TE1VIECULA CITY COUNCIL DOES
RESOLVE, DETER_MINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Findings. That the City of Temecula City Council in Certifying the
proposed Final Environmental Impact RepOrt (FEIR), makes the following findings, to wit:
A. Reference Attachment 5 of the Planning Commission Staff Report, Findings of
Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations.
Section 2. Conditions. That the City of Temecula City Council hereby certifies FEIR
(Planning Applicatio~ No. 94-0002), adopts Findings of Fact and Statements of Overriding
Consideration and approves the Mitigation Monitoring Program on 6.64 acres of land located
north of Winchester Road and west of the extension of Roripaugh Road and known as Assessor' s
Parcel No. 911 - 180-024. .'
R:\STAFFRPT~157PA93.CC 617194
Section 3.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOP'II~ this 14th day of June, 1994.
ATTEST:
RON ROBERTS
MAYOR
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CAIIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA)
I HEREBY CERTFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City
Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 14th day of June,
1994 by the following vote of the Council:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCII_M/EbIBERS
COUNCILMEMBERS
COUNCH-MEVIBERS
JUNE S. Gi~-~
CITY CLF~RK
R:\STAFFRPTH$7PA93.CC 6/7/94 klb 10
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - MAY 2, 1994
R:\STAFFRPT~157PA93.CC 6/7/94 klb 11
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES MAY 09.1994 --.
ABSENT: I '-COMMISSIONERS: Salyer
9. PA93-0157 AND PA94-000~)
ReQuest to approve a Conditional Use Permit to allow the construction and
operation of a transportation, administration and maintenance facility for the
Temecula Valley Unified School District. The facility includes storage of school
buses and maintenance vehicles, fuel and wash islands, bus repair bays, repair
shops for maintenance operations and administrative offices. Located north of
Winchester Road and west of the extension of Roripaugh Road.
Associate Planner Saied Naaseh presented the staff report.
Chairman Ford opened the public hearing at 8:25 P.M.
Dave Callaher, Director of Facilities Development, Temecula Valley Unified School
District, 31350 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, provided the Commission With an
overview of the project.
Michelle Bedard, 39857 Knollridge Drive, Temecula, expressed her concern with the
traffic on Winchester Road presently and the impacts the project will have on the
already heavily traveled Winchester Road. Ms. Bedard said she uses Rustic Glen to
get to her personal residence and a signal is needed at Rustic Glen and Winchester
Road to help get the cars out onto Winchester Road safely.
Bruce Weckesser, 27441 Bolandra Court, Temecula, said he feels the proposed use
is incompatible with the area. Mr. Weckesser said he feels the bus facility is more
compatible with an industrial location.
Planning Director Gary Thornhill said an E.I.R. was completed on the project and
staff feels all the issues have been addressed regarding this site and the proposed
project.
Douglas Wood, the environmental consultant for the school 'district, explained the
noise and air quality testing.
Chairman Ford questioned Condition No. 7, which talks about parking spaces for
visitors and requested the condition stipulate "Visitor Only" and be designated on
site as such. 'Chairman Ford also asked for clarification of Condition No. 11.
Commissioner Fahey suggested the language in Condition No. 11 be amended to
state "...29 buses operating on-site..."..'
It was moved by Commissioner Blair, seconded by Commissioner Fahey to close the
public hearing at 8:55 P.M. and Adopt Resolution No. 94-08 certifying the
Environmental Impact Report (Planning Application No. 94-0002)for Planning
PCMIN0510211994
7 0511 1194
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
MAY 09, 1994
Application No. 93-0157; and Adopt Resolution No. 94-07 approving Planning
Application No. 93-0157, based upon the Analysis and Findings contained in the
staff report and amend Condition No. 7 to designate 'Visitor' parking spaces and
amend Condition No. 11 to clarify ' .... 29 buses shall be operating on-site ..... '.
The motion carried as follows:.
AYES: 3 COMMISSIONERS: Biair, Fahey, Hoagland
NOES: I COMMISSIONERS: Ford
ABSENT: I COMMISSIONERS: Salyer
Chairman Ford said he opposed the motion based on the number of buses and the
location :he site. He said he is also concerned about the dam inundation study.
PLANNING DIRECTI ~PORT
Director Thornhill advised Commission the first meeting in June
Rancho California Water Board ROom.
Director Thornhill said the Old
Local Review Board has
held at the
re-appointed.
PLANNING COMMISSION DISCUS~
Chairman Ford advised he received a
standards at the Senior Center, which will
standards.
to Mr. Bill Harker regarding the light
ed to comply with the Old Town
ADJOURNMENT
Chairman Ford declared the
adjourned at 9: P.M.
The next regular meetil
23, 1994, 6:00 P.M
California.
the City of Temecula Ph
Vail Elementary School, 29915
Commission will be held on May
Drive, Temecula,
an Steve Ford
Secretary
PCMIN05102/I 994
06/11/14
ATTACHMENT NO. 4
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT - MAY 2, 1994
R:\STAFFRPT~IJTPAgJ.CC 6/7/94 klb 12
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
May 2, 1994
Planning Application No. 93-0157 and 940002
Piepared By: Saied Naaseh, Associate Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Department Staff recommends the Planning
Commission:
e
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT:
REPRESENTATIVE:
PROPOSAL:
LOCATION:
EXISTING ZONING:
ADOPT Resolution No. 94- certifying the
Environmental Impact Report (Planning Application No.
94-0002) for Planning Application No. 93-0157; and
ADOPT Resolution No. 94- approving Planning
Application No. 93-0157, based upon the Analysis and
Findings contained in the Staff Report.
Temecula Valley Unified School District
BGRP Architecture and Planning and Douglas Wood and
Associates
A request to approve a Conditional Use Permit to allow
the construction and operation of a transportation,
administration and maintenance facility for the Temecula
Valley Unified School District and certify the
Environmental Impact Report for the project. The facility
includes storage of school buses (with no more than 29
buses 'operational) and maintenance vehicles, fuel and
wash islands, bus repair bays, repair shops for
maintenance operations and administrative offices.
North of Winchester Road and west of the extension of
Roripaugh Road
R-R (Rural Residential)
SURROUNDING ZONING:
North:
South:
East:
West:
R-R (Rural Residential)
R-R (Rural Residential)
R-R (Rural Residential)
R-R (Rural Residential)
R:\STAFFRPT~157PA93.PC 4/28/94 edl
PROPOSED ZONING: Not requested
GENERAL PLAI~I
DESIGNATION:
Business Park
EXISTING LAND USE:
Vacant
SURROUNDING LAND USES:
North: Vacant
South: Vacant
East: Vacant
West: Vacant
PROJECT STATISTICS
Building Area: 24,399 square
Service Bays: 6
Landscape Area: 19,870 square
Hardscape Area: 235,227 square
Total: 279,496 square
feet
feet
feet
feet (6.6 acres)
Visitor Parking Provided: 10
Off Site Employee Parking Provided: 100
Bus Storage: 40
Maintenance Vehicle Storage: 74
spaces
spaces
spaces
spaces
BACKGROUND
This project was formally submitted to the Planning Department on July 23, 1993. The
Development Review Committee (DRC) meeting was held on August 12, 1993. The
Environmental Impact Report (EIR) went through four Screen Check reviews before the Draft
EIR was sent to the State Clearing House on Febr.uary 22, 1994 for a 45 day public comment
period.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposed Temecula Valley Unified School District (TVUSD) Transportation, Administration
and Maintenance Facility will contain a total of 24,399 interior square feet for various
transportation, administration and maintenance activities. Space will also be provided for 40
school buses and 74 maintenance vehicles as well as a fuel and wash island for District
vehicles.
The transportation portion of the facility will inv61ve 10,863 square feet of space for six bus
repair bays with associated repair and storage areas. Surrounding the transportation portion
of the facility are the 40 bus parking stalls· The transportation functions will operate between
the hours of 6:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. with 29 buses generally departing and returning
between 7:00 a.m. and 8:45 a.m. and 2:00 p.m. to 4:30 p.m.
R:\STAFFRPT~157PA93.PC 4/28/94 sdl 2
The administration portion of the facility will involve 5,939 interior square feet of office space
for District administrative functions and will generally operate between the hours of 7:00 a.m.
and 5:00 p.m.' Monday through Friday.
The maintenance portion of the proposed facility consists of 6,035 square feet of repair shops
performing plumbing, heating/air conditioning, carpentry, electrical, locksmith, irrigation and
landscape maintenance functions. This portion of the facility will be operational between the
hours of 6:45 a.m. and 3:30 p.m. Monday Through Friday.
An additional 1,562 square feet of common area containing compressors, lubrication and
welding equipment will also be provided. As previously indicated, a fuel and wash island will
be provided to serve District vehicles. Dispensing facilities for compressed natural gas for use
in motor vehicles is being considered for the fuel island.
In addition to the forty (40) bus parking stalls noted above, the proposed TranSportation,
Administration and Maintenance facility will also contain seventy four (74) parking spaces for
maintenance vehicles, ten (10) visitor parking stalls, including two (2) handicap spaces,
adjacent to the administration portion of the proposed facility and a separate storage area for
lawn mowers and other landscape equipment.
ANALYSIS
Access and Circulation
Project access is provided by a temporary 36 foot wide asphalt easement to Margarita Road
(refer to exhibit H). Four (4) way stop signs will control the traffic at this intersection. The
permanent access will be provided by extending the existing Roripaugh Road across
Winchester Road. The portion of Roripaugh Road extension adjacent to the site is conditioned
to be improved with 56 feet of asphalt pavement with the completion of this project.
However, the Roripaugh Road and Nicolas Road extensions will be completed prior to
completion of this project as a part of the high school project. It should be noted that these
extensions can not be utilized until the grade difference between the existing Winchester Road
and these extensions is eliminated by the widening project for Winchester Road, Winchester
Road will be improved with the construction of the Chaparral High School. Therefore, after
the construction of Winchester Road, the temporary access, along with the four (4) way stop
sign to Margarita will be removed. Roripaugh Road extension from Winchester Road to the
northerly side of the site will be a private road.
The site has been designed to accommodate easy circulation of the buses and maintenance
vehicles. Landscape. planters have been mainly limited to the perimeter of the project to
screen the operations. The site is surrounded by an eight (8) foot masonry wall with security
gates providing access to the interior of the site.
Architecture ,'
The main building and wall surrounding the site are concrete tilt up structures with red and
gray concrete split face building elevations. The main spine of the building is a walkway
covered by a green metal roof. White stucco is used on the elevations of this walkway. The
Fueling Center and the Exterior Wash use the same type of tilt up construction with green
metal roofing.
R:\STAFFRPT%157PA93.pC 4/28/94 sdl 3
Landscaoe Plans
The planters along the eas~e~r~ and southern property lines are located outside the property
lines. The project has been conditioned to obtain easements for this property and will be
responsible for maintaining the landscaping for this area. The main objective of the landscape
plan is to provide visual screening of the facility and the wall from the adjacent uses. To
screen the facility, Brachychiton Populneus (Bottle Tree) has been proposed on the east, west
and south property lines which has moderate growth to 30-50 feet high and 30 foot spread.
To screen the wall, Rhaphiolepis Indica (India Hawthorn), a fast growing shrub to five (5) feet
high and wide, and Clytostoma Callistegioides (Violet Trumpet Vine), a vigorous climber vine,
will be used to screen the wall.
ReQuired Parkina
The proposed facility will be used almost exclusively by the School District personnel with few
visitors to the site; therefore, only ten (10) parking spaces have been provided for visitors. All
employees will park their vehicles in the parking facility that will be built for the Chaparral High
School where one hundred (100) spaces have been provided (refer to Exhibit H). This parking
lot will be completed with the Roripaugh and Nicolas Road extensions prior to occupancy of
the project. The School District expects the number of employees at the site to be 96 and this
number should grow to 116 by year 2010.
Area Compatibility
The land uses immediately adjacent to the site are currently vacant. The adjacent properties
to the east and south are designated in the General Plan as BP (Business Park). The General
Plan states the typical permitted uses for this designation include professional offices, research
and development, laboratories, manufacturing, storage , industrial supply, and wholesale
businesses. Santa Gertrudis Creek borders the site to the west and the proposed Chaparral
High School is to the north. Therefore, the proposed use will be compatible with the uses
immediately adjacent to the site.
The single-family residences exist further to the northwest across the creek and to the east.
across Winchester Road. The' proposed site is lower than the existing single family
development to the east and northwest. With future construction of the high school and the
Business Park parcel adjacent to Winchester Road and Margarita Roads, the view to the site
will be blocked by these structures. However, to further minimize the view impacts until these
structures are constructed, the project proposes a landscape planter with trees to screen the
facility from these homes.
EXISTING ZONING A~ID GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION
The existing zoning for the site is R-R (Rural Residential). This project is permitted in this zone
provided that a conditional use permit is granted pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.28
of Ordinance No. 348. The General Plan land use designation for the site is B-P (Business
park). The project as proposed is consistent with Ordinance No. 348 and the General Plan.
R:\STAFFRPT~157PA93.PC 4/28/94 sdl 4
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
An initial study was completed for the project by planning staff which indicated that there
would be potentially significant impacts with the development of the project. Consequently,
staff determined that an Environmental Impact Report would be necessary for the project.
Environmental Impact Report No. 94-0002 was prepared by the applicant's consultant,
Douglas Wood and Associates, Inc. The Environmental Impact Report analyzed the
significance of all the major impacts. By certifying the Final Environmental Impact Report, the
Planning Commission adopts the Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations
and the Mitigation Monitoring Program. Following is a summary of these impacts which have
been mitigated to insignificant levels by the mitigation measures unless otherwise specified
that a Statement of Overriding Considerations .has been prepared:
SEISMIC SAFETY
The proposed project will be impacted by seismic activity along the Wildomar Fault alignment
which is located approximately 1.4 miles southwest of the project.
Due to the content of on-site soils and the depth of groundwater, secondary seismic hazards
such as liquefaction, if any, that may occur will be confined to the relatively thin zones of
deep saturated soils. Any minor liquefaction occurring on-site is considered insignificant and
is not anticipated to cause damage or collapse of on-site structures.
According to project grading plans, the developed project will be at an elevation of 1076 feet
above mean sea level, I 1 feet below the estimated elevation of water in the event of a breach
of Skinner Reservoir Dam. Since the project site lies within the dam inundation area for
Skinner Reservoir Dam, it may be subject to seismically induced flooding from dam failure.
This is considered to be an unavoidable adverse impact. Therefore, a Statement of Overriding
Considerations must be adopted by the Planning Commission (refer to Attachment 5).
SLOPES & EROSION
Development of the project will 'require alteration of the existing natural landform. Complete
removal of all alluvial, topsoil, and loose compressible low strength older allUvium, and/or
disturbed bedrock will be necessary prior to placement of structural fills.
According to the Project Engineer, the proposed grading plan results in an estimated 30,700
cubic yards of cut and 85,300 cubic yards of fill. This results in a grading irabalance of
approximately 56,600, cubic yards. The additional fill, according to the project engineer, is
required in order to raise the proposed structures out of the 100 year floodplain.
Due to the content of on-site soils and site's proximity to Santa Gertrudis Creek, slope erosion
is a concern with regard to surficial stability. In addition, landscaped slopes along the project
perimeter will be provided, if necessary. Drainage and erosion control measures shall be
established at the time of final grading and maintained throughout the life of the project in
order to provide long-term slope stability and performance.
R:\STAFFRPT~157PA93.pC 4128194 edl 5
The State and Regional W_a:ter Quality Control Boards (RWQCB) currently administer the
National Pollut~nt Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit regulations. NPDES permits
are issued by the state under the authority of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to
selected industries, construction activities and municipalities. The proposed project will be
required to comply with the NPDES General Construction Activity Storm Water Permit as well
as any permit issued by the City of Temecula.
NOISE
Short-Term Impacts
Construction noise represents a short-term impact on ambient noise levels. Noise generated
by construction equipment, including trucks, graders, bulldozers, concrete mixers and portable
generators can reach high levels. When construction occurs adjacent to existing residential
development, the hours of construction will be limited to 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. on Monday through
Friday. Construction will not be permitted on weekends or federal holidays.
School Bus Noise Impacts
The primary noise concerns associated with the proposed project will be the school bus
operations. Other noise within the facility will be secondary. Potential noise impacts on
adjacent residences due to the school buses operating out of the proposed site also were
assessed.
In order to provide an accurate assessment of noise levels attributed to bus start-up, start-up
noise levels were recorded from 6:00 a.m. to 7:00 a.m. on July 29, 1992. According to the
measurements, the noise levels attributed to bus operations will be lower than the ambient
noise levels at the three measurement sites which were located adjacent to existing single
family residences. Noise levels at these locations provide a "worst-case" assessment of noise
impacts of the project upon adjacent residential land uses. At these three locations, the bus
start-up noise levels will meet the day-time model noise criteria without mitigation measures.
Project Traffic Noise Impacts
The proposed project will also generate traffic, and as a result may alter pr. ojected noise levels
in the surrounding areas. To assess the impact of the proposed project on land uses adjacent
to streets that will serve the project, the change in roadway noise along the streets was
determined. Due to. future development which has already been approved there will be an
increase in traffic in the surrounding area with or without the proposed project. In community
noise assessment changes, noise levels greater than 3 dBA are often identified as significant,
while changes less than 1 dBA will not be discernible to local residents. The future 1994
noise levels will not increase substantially over existing noise levels (less than 3 dBA for the
roadways serving the project).
R:\STAFFRPT~157PA93.PC 4/28/94 edl. 6
AIR QUALITY
Short Term Iml~acts
Temporary impacts will result from project construction activities. Air pollutants will be
emitted by construction equipment and dust will be generated during grading and site
preparation. Only nitrogen oxide emissions exceed SCAQMD Thresholds of Significance, per
the Final Draft 1991 CEQA Air Quality handbook. This is considered to be a short-term but
an unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations must be
adopted by the Planning Commission.
Long-Term Impacts
Local Carbon Monoxide Impacts from School Bus Operations
Potential air quality impacts from the proposed bus start ups were assessed through a CO
monitoring effort at four sensitive receptors surrounding the project site. CO concentrations
were monitored on July 29, 1992 at Sites 1 through 4 from 6:00 a.m. to 7:00 a.m. for
conditions with school bus engines running.
The data indicates that there is no significant increase in CO concentration for conditions with
the buses running compared to conditions without the school buses running. Therefore,
school bus operations at the Transportation/Maintenance Facility will not generate a significant
increase in CO concentrations at Measurement Sites.
The air quality consultant who performed the CO monitoring on July 29 and 30, 1992 has
indicated that diesel odors were not noticeable during the on-site monitoring procedures.
Given the distance from the pollutant source to sensitive receptors (adjacent residential land
uses and the future high school) and staggered bus start-up times, in contrast to the
simultaneous start-ups which occurred during the on-site tests, long term impacts associated
with diesel odors resulting from the project are not considered significant.
CIRCULATION
Project Access
The proposed project is planned to take its primary access from Margarita Road opposite the
existing entry to Costco until the future Chaparral High School is constructed. At that time,
the interim access onto Margarita Road will be closed and the proposed project will take direct
permanent access onto Winchester Road opposite Roripaugh Road. According to the Traffic
Engineer, the proposed project will not change the level of service on any of the intersections
that were analyzed except at the interim access intersection at the Margarita Road/Costco
entry. The proposed project changes the level. of service at that intersection from C to E
during the evening peak hour as a result of school bus, maintenance vehicle and employee
traffic. Therefore, a four way Stop Sign will be installed by the project.
R:\STAFFRPT~157PA83.PC 4/28/94 sdl 7
Level of ServiC~ in Study ~Fea~'
Since traffic generated by the proposed project will not result in a level of service change at
any of the intersections which were analyzed, traffic impacts associated with the proposed
project are not considered significant. The intersections of Winchester Road/Nicolas Road and
Winchester Road/Roripaugh Road are currently operating at Level of Service "F" during the
evening peak hour and the existing volumes meet the warrants for signalization. Project
impacts on existing traffic levels at the Winchester Road/Nicolas Road and Winchester
Road/Roripaugh Road intersections are 3.4 percent and 2.9 percent, respectively. The School
District will transfer the existing Maintenance Operations and Transportation facility from its
Rancho Vista Road site to the proposed site. Therefore, the level of activity at the new site
will be the same as the existing site (which is somewhat less than the ultimate development
that was used to estimate ultimate project traffic in the Traffic Analysis) and there will not be
a net increase in areawide traffic.
HYDROLOGY
The development phase of the project will result in the creation of impermeable surfaces
(parking lots, bus storage areas, roofs, etc.) on-site that will increase the existing storm runoff
to Santa Gertrudis and Murrieta Creeks. The developed on-site runoff, as well as upstream
surface flows, will be adequately conveyed by the proposed on-site drainage system.
Drainage facilities from the project site ultimately discharge downstream into the Santa
Gertrudis Creek and ultimately into Murrieta Creek. This incremental increased flow rate will
contribute to cumulative increased flow rates downstream and the potential for flooding in
areas with undersized facilities. Since the project.site lies within a dam inundation area for
the Skinner Reservoir Dam, it may be subject to seismically induced flooding from dam failure.
This is considered to be an unavoidable adverse impact. Therefore, a Statement of Overriding
Considerations must be adopted by the Planning Commission.
WATER QUALITY
Construction of the proposed project will alter the composition of surface runoff by the grading
of site surfaces, construction of impervious streets, parking lots, service areas, and roofs, and
by irrigation of landscaped areas. Runoff entering the storm drain system will contain minor
amounts of pollutants typical of most urban uses, including pesticides, fertilizers, oil, rubber
residue, detergents,.hydrocarbons, and other debris. This runoff, typical of urban use, will
contribute to the incremental degradation of water quality downstream in Santa Gertrudis and
Murrieta Creeks.
All parking and bus storage areas within the proposed project will drain into a clarifier which
provides three stage treatment for surface run6ff. This clarifier will insure adherence to
NPDES requirements. Eastern Municipal Water District will monitor the quality of runoff from
these paved surfaces.
R:\STAFFRPT~157PA93.pC 4/28/94 sdl 8
RISK OF UPSET
The proposed ~roject may involve the storage and use of hazardous materials. As such, the
project has the potential for the risk of explosion and/or the release of hazardous substances.
The use of these hazardous or toxic substances is governed by OSHA standards and the
County Health Department criteria. In the event of an accidental upset of toxic materials on
the project site, the School District is equipped to handle toxic material spills with equipment
being used or stored on-site. In the event of such an episode, storm drains could be
temporarily blocked in order to contain the spill and avoid drainage into downstream areas.
CULTURAL & SCIENTIFIC RESOURCES
No archaeological resources have been found on-site. The surface alluvial deposits found on-
site are sediments laid down by streams that flowed across the region within the last 10,000
years. These sediments are considered to be too young geologically to contain any significant
fossils. Considering its past history of fossil discovery, the Pauba Formation underlying these
surface alluvial deposits is considered to have a Moderate to High paleontological sensitivity.
WILD LIFE & VEGETATION
Conversion of the on-site introduced grassland biotic community to accommodate the
proposed project will reduce areawide introduced grassland habitat for raptors. However, the
area is not considered to be of high significance in this regard. The same holds true for the
loss of habitat supporting other grassland species of wildlife. Development of the proposed
project will not result in the loss of occupied Stephens' Kangaroo Rat (SKR) habitat.
LAND USE
The proposed land uses are in conformance with the City of Temecula General Plan
designation of BP (Business Park) if a Conditional Use Permit is approved in accordance with
Ordinance No. 348. The project applicant has submitted an application for approval of a
Conditional Use Permit (PA93-0157).
The change in land use resulting from project development will not result in significant impacts
to agriculture as agricultural activity on-site has been discontinued. However, project
implementation will result in urban development on "Prime" soils which is considered a
significant impact of project development. According to the California Department of
Conservation, the loss of any "Prime" agricultural land is considered a significant impact for
which a Statement of Overriding Considerations must be adopted by the planning Commission.
TOXIC SUBSTANCEd
These functions may involve the storage and use of hazardous material. As such, the project
has the potential for the risk of explosion and/oi the release of hazardous substances. The
use of these hazardous or toxic substances is governed by Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA), Cal OSHA, and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) standards and
County Health Department criteria. Potentially hazardous substances to be found and utilized
in the proposed Maintenance, Operations and Transportation Facility include fuels, greases and
oils, and cleaning solvents, adhesives, paints, automobile parts (brakes, batteries, antifreeze,
etc.)
R:\STAFFRPT~157PA93.PC 4/28/94 edl 9
According to the Temecula Valley Unified School District, employees are given general training
in the handling of potenti_ally__hazardous materials. In addition, employees whose duties
include the 'handling of any identified hazardous material are given specialized training in the
handling of that substance.
In the event of a hazardous material spill, the School District would be equipped to handle
toxic or hazardous material spills with equipment being used or stored on-site. In the event
of such an episode, on-site storm drains can be temporarily blocked in order to contain the spill
and avoid drainage into downstream areas.
AESTHETICS/LIGHT & GLARE
Project development will permanently alter the nature and appearance of the 6.64 acre project
site from its current open space use to the land uses proposed. According to the Landscape
Concept Plan, the project site will be surrounded on three sides by street trees, accent trees
and shrubs which are intended to provide an aesthetic buffer between the fully-developed
project site and surrounding areas, including Winchester Road. View Analyses from the North
and South, respectively, provide graphic representation of the future appearance of the project
site with development of the proposed structures. The site itself does not contain nor will
proposed development block any scenic vistas which merit preservation.
Mitiaation Monitorina Proaram
The Draft Environmental Impact Report includes the proposed Mitigation Monitoring Program
for the project. The Mitigation Monitoring Program is included as a Condition of Approval for
the project as a whole with several of the mitigations being separate Conditions of Approval
for the project.
SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS
The proposed use is appropriate for the site since the Environmental Impact Report has
proposed mitigation measures that reduce all the impacts of the project to an insignificant level
with the exception of short term air quality impacts associated with the construction of the
project, hydrology and seismic .~afety impacts associated with the location of the site within
the Dam Inundation area of Skinner Reservoir Dam, and land use impacts associated with the
removal of Prime Agricultural land.
The site will complement the proposed high school and is centrally located within the school
district boundaries.
FINDINGS
The land use or action proposed is consistent with the General Plan. The land use
designation for the site is identified in thl~ General Plan as BP (Business Park).
The provisions contained in Ordinance No. 348 allow for construction and operation
of this project provided that a conditional use permit is granted.
R:\STAFFRPT~I 57PA93.PC 4/28/94 edl 10
m
The proposed use or action complies with all other requirements of state law and local
ordinances. The proposed use complies with California Governmental Code Section
65360, Section 18.28 (Conditional Use Permit) of Ordinance No. 348.
The proposed project will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of
the community. In addition, the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) prepared for this
project mitigates all significant impacts of proposed project to an insignificant level with
the exception of Hydrology, Seismic Safety, Air Quality and Land Use impacts for
which Statement of Overriding Considerations have been prepared. Mitigation.
measures have been included in the Conditions of Approval.
The site is suitable to accommodate the proposed land use in terms of the size and
shape of the lot configuration, access,. and intensity of use, because the proposed
planning application (conditional use. permit), as conditioned, complies with the
standards contained within the City's General Plan and Ordinance No. 348.
,
The project has acceptable access to a dedicated right-of-way via an easement which
is open to, and useable by, vehicular traffic. Access to the project site is from a
publicly maintained road (Margarita Road).
The design of the project and the type of improvements are such that they are not in
conflict with easements for access through or use of the property within the proposed
project.
Said findings are supported by maps, exhibits and environmental documents associated
with these applications and herein incorporated by reference.
Attachments:
2.
3.
4.
6.
7.
8.
PC Resolution 94° - Blue Page 12
PC Resolution 94- - Blue Page 15
Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 19
Exhibits - Blue Page 33
A. Vicinity Map
B. Zoning Map
C. Site Plan
D. Landscape Plan
E. Elevations
F. Elevations
G. Floor Plans
H. Over All Site Plan
Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations - Blue Page 34
Mitigation Monitoring Program - Blue Pagi~ 35
Public Comments- Blue Page 36
Response to Public Comments - Blue Page 37
R:\STAFFRP"1~157PA93,PC 4/28/94 edl 11
ATTACHMENT NO. I
RESOLUTION NO. 94-
R:\STAFFRPT~157PA93.PC 4128/94 edl 12
A'ITACttMENT NO. 1
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THY~ PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA CERTIFYING
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT RI~-PORT (PLANNING
APHACATION NO. 94-0002), ADOPTING FINDINGS OF
FACT AND STATEMENTS OF OVERRIDING
CONSIDERATION AND APPROVING OF THE
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM ON PROPERTY
LOCATED NORTH OF WINCHESTER ROAD AND WEST
OF ~ EXTENSION OF RORIPAUGH ROAD AND
KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARC~',I, NO. 911-180-024.
Wt!~~, Doughs Woods and Associates completed Environmental Impact Report
(Planning Application No. 94-0002) in accordance with the Riverside County and State CEQA
Guidelines;
WREREAS, said h"TR application was processed in the time and manner prescribed by
State and local law;
WH'EREAS, the Planning Commission considered said EIR on May 2, 1994, at which
time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing, the Planning
Commission Certified said EIR, Adopted the Findings of Fact and Statements of Overriding
Consideration and Approved the Mitigation Monitoring Program;
NOW, TIIF~REFORE, ~ CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING CO1VIMISSION
DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Findings. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission in recommending
Certification of the proposed FEIR, makes the following fmdings, to wit:
A. Attachment 5 of the Staff Report, Findings of Fact and Statement of' Overriding
Considerations'
Section 2. Conditions. That the City of T~mecula Planning Commission hereby certifies
FEIR (Planning Application No. 94-0002), adopts Findings of Fact and Statements of Overriding
Consideration and approves of the Mitigation Monitoring Program on 6.64 acres of land located
north of Winchester Road and west of the extension of Roripaugh Road and known as Assessor' s
Parcel No. 911 - 180-024.
Section 3. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 2nd day of May, 1994.
R:\STAFFRPT%157PA93.PC 4/28/94 salt 13
STEVEN I. FORD
I ltRRERy CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 2nd day of May,
1994 by the following vote of the Commission:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
PLANNING COIVIMISSIONE~:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
GARY THORNI-rrr-~,
SECRETARY
R:\STAFFRPT~157PA93.PC 4/28/94 sdl
14
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
RESOLUTION NO. 94-
R:\STAFFRPT%157PA93 .PC 4/28/94 ed| 15
ATrACHlVlg~ NO. 2
RESOLIYHON NO. 94-
A RESOLUTION OF TIff. PLANNING COMMISSION OF
~ CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A RF_~UEST TO
APPROVE PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 930157, A
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO AT,TOW TtTE
CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF A
TRANSPORTATION, ADMINISTRATION AND
MAINTENANCE FACII.ITY FOR ~ TEMECULA
VAT.IJ~-Y UN~W.I} SCHOOL'DISTRICT. T!:ff- FACILITY
INCLUDES STORAGE OF SCHOOL BUSES (WITH NO
MORE THAN 29 OPERATIONAL AT ANY GIVEN TIME)
AND MAINTENANCE V~.mCLES, FUi~.T, AND WASH
ISLANDS, BUS REPAIR BAYS, lIEPAIR SHOPS FOR
MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS AND ADMINISTRATIVE
OFFICES LOCATEI) NORTH OF WIN~-~ ROAD
AND WEST OF ~ EXTENSION OF RORIPAUGH ROAD
AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEl, NO. 911-180-024
WItF~REAS, The Temecula Valley Unified School District fled Planning Application
No. 93-0157 (PA 93-0157) in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Riverside
County Land Use and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference;
WHEREAS, PA 93-0157 and was processed in the time and manner prescribed by State
and local law;
Wtt~-REAS, the Planning' Commission considered PA 93-0157 on May 2, 1994, at a
duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time interested persons had an
opp0rmnity to testify either in support or in opposition;
WHF. REAS, at the public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and
arguments, if any, of all persons deserving to be heard, the Commission considered all facts
relating to PA 93-0157;
NOW, TFrF.~.EFORE, THF~ PLANNING COMMISSION OF ~ CITY OF
TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the above recitations ar~'true and correct.
Section 2.
following fmdings:
Findings. That the Temecula Planning Commission hereby makes the
R:\STAFFRPT~157PA93.PC 4/28/94
16
The land use or action proposed is consistent with the General Plan. The land use
designaU_'on for the site_. ~ identified in the General P!nn as BP (Business Park).
The provisions contained in Ordinance No. 348 allow for construction and operation of
this project provided that a conditional use pentfit is granted.
The proposed use or action complies with all other requirements of state hw and local
ordinances. The proposed use complies with California Governmental Code Section
65360, Section 18.28 (Conditional Use Permit) of Ordinance No. 348.
The proposed project will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of
the community. In addition, the Environmental Impact Report O:IR) prepared for this
project mitigates all significant impacts of proposed project to an insignificant level with
the exception of Hydrology, Seismic Safety, Air Quality and Land Use impacts for which
Statement of Overriding Considerations have been prepared. Mitigation measures have
been included in the Conditions of Appwval.
The site is suitable to accommodate the proposed land use in tens of the size and shape
of the lot configuration, access, and intensity of use, because the proposed planning
application (conditional use permit), as condition.d, complies with the standards
contained within the City's General Plan and Ordinance No. 348.
,
The project has acceptable access to a dedicated fight-of-way via an easement which is
open to, and us.able by, vehicular traffic. Access to the project site is from a publicly
maintained road (Margarita Road).
The design of the project and the type of improvements are such that they are not in
conflict with easements for access through or use of the property within the proposed
project.
Said findings are supported by maps, exhibits and environmental documents associated
with these applications and her.in incorporated by reference.
Section 3. Environmental Compliance. An initial study was completed for the project
by Planning staff which indicated that there would be potentially significant impacts with the
development of the liroject. Consequently, staff determined that an Environmental Impact
Report would be necessary for the pwject. Environmental Impact Report No. 94-0002 was
prepared by the applicant's consultant, Douglas Wood and Associates, Inc. and was reviewed
by City staff. The Environmental Impact R~', --. ahalyzed the significance of all the impacts and
proposed mitigation measures included ih :a~, lmal nlR that reduced these impacts to an
insignificant level with the exception of Seismic Safety, Climate and Air Quality, Hydrology and
Land Use for which Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations have been
included within the final EIR. Therefore, the City of Temecuh Certifies the Final
Environmental Impact Report (PA 94-0002) which includes the Draft l!TR ,. the Response to
Comments, the Mitigation Monitoring Program, Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding
R:\STAFFRP'T'%157PA93.PC 4~28~94 sdt 17
Considerations, the Staff Report and any associated attachments, and finds that it has been
complexed in Cqmplinnce w_iffi _the California Quality Act (CEQA).
Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecuh Planning Commi.~sion hereby
appwves PA 93-0157 W allow the construction and operation of a transportation, administration
and maintenance facility for the Temecula Valley Unified School District. The facility includes
storage of school buses (with no more than 29 buses being operational at any given time) and
maintenance vehicles, fuel and wash islands, bus repair bays, repair shops for maintenance
operations and administrative offices located at North of Winchester Road and west of the'
extension of Roripaugh Road and known as Assessor's Parcel No. 911-180-024, subject to the
following conditions:
A. Attachment No. 2.
Section 5. PASSED, AlPROVED AND ADOPTED this 2nd day of May, 1994.
STEVEN J. FORD
CHAIRMAN
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 2nd day of May,
1994 by the following vote of the Commission:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
G~Y~ORNI-tHJ,
SERET~Y
R:\STAFFRPT%157PA93.PC 4/28/94 edl 18
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
R:\STAFFRPT~157PA93.PC 4/28/94 edl 19
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No. PA93-0157, (Conditional Use Permit)
Project Description: Maintenance, Operations and Transportation facilities for.
the Temecula Valley Unified School' District which includes storage of school
buses (with no more than 29 buses being operational at any given time) and
maintenance vehicles, fuel and wash islands, bus repair bays, repair shops for
maintenance operations and administrative offices
Assessor's Parcel No.: 911-180-024
Approval Date:
Expiration Date:
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project
The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashiers
check or money order payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Nine
Hundred Twenty-Eight Dollars ( $ 928.00) which includes the Eight Hundred Fifty
Dollars ($850.00) fee, in compliance with AB 3158, required by Fish and Game
Code Section 711.4(d)(3) plus the Seventy-Eight Dollar ($78.00) County
administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination required
under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and 14 California Code of
Regulations Section 15094. If within such forty-eight (48) hour period the
applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check
required above, the approval for the project granted herein shall be void by
reason of failure of condition, Fish and Game Code Section 711 ~4(c).
General Requirements
e
The use hereby permitted by the approval of Planning Application No. PA93-
0157 is for ~he Maintenance, Operations and Transportation facility for the
Temecula Valley Unified School District which includes storage of school buses
(with no more than 29 buses being operational at any given time) and
maintenance vehicles, fuel and wash' islands, bus repair bays, repair shops for
maintenance operations and administrative offices.
The permittee shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Temecula,
its agents, officers, and employees. from any claims, action, or proceeding
against the City of Temecula or its agents, officers, or employees to. attach, set
aside, void, or annul, an approval of the City of Temecula, its advisory
R:\STAFFRPT~157PA93.PC 4/28/94 sdl 20
8.
9.
10.
11.
agencies, appeal boards, or legislative body concerning Planning Application No.
PA93-0157. The_City of Temecula will promptly notify the permittee of any
such claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula and will
cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the permittee
of any such claim, action or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the
defense, the permittee shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend,
indemnify, or hold harmless the City of Temecula.
This approval shall be used within one (1) year of the approval datei otherwise,
it shall become null 'and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial
construction contemplated by this approval within the one (1) year period which
is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial
utilization contemplated by this approval.
The development of the premises shall conform substantially with the Exhibits
approved with Planning Application No. PA93-0157, or as amended by these
conditions.
Colors and materials used shall conform substantially with Exhibit(s) marked I,
or as amended by these conditions. (color elevations and material board).
Materials. Colors
Exterior: Concrete Tilt Up
Stucco
Roof: Metal
Windows: Aluminum
Doors: Metal
Glass: Glass
Natural (Type A) and Suntan (Type B),
Light Gray (CM 8592)
Jade Green (AEP Span)
Green/Blue (CM 8684)
Taupe (CM 8453)
Light Reflective Silver (VA 1-13)
Ten (10) parking spaces shall be-provided.
A minimum of two (2) handicapped parking spaces shall be provided.
Four (4) Class II bicycle racks shall be provided.
The applicant shall comply with all the mitigation measures identified in the
Mitigation Monitoring Program of the Environmental Impact Report (EIR PA94-
0002, Attachment No. 6).
If the number of school buses is increased at a future time to more than twenty
nine (29), the School District shall receive Planning Director approval to access
the additional traffic, air quality and noise impacts associated with the
additional buses.
R:\STAFFRPT~157PA93.PC 4/28194 mdl 2 1
Prior to the Issuance of Grading Permits
12.
The applicant sha~ C~mply with Ordinance No. 663 by paying the fee required
by that ordinance which is based on (the gross acreage of the parcels proposed
for development). Should Ordinance No. 663 be superseded by the provisions
of a Habitat Conservation Plan prior to the payment of the fees required by
Ordinance No. 663, the applicant shall pay the fee required under the Habitat
Conservation Plan as implemented by County ordinance or resolution.
13.
The applicant shall demonstrate by submittal of a written report that all
mitigation measures identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Program have been
satisfied for this stage of the development.
Prior to the Issuance of Building Permits
14.
Three (3) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be
submitted to the Planning Department for approval and shall be accompanied
by the appropriate filing fee. The location, number, genus, species, and
container size of the plants shall be shown consistent with the approved
conceptual plans.
15.
The applicant shall demonstrate by submittal of a written report that all
mitigation measures identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Program have been
satisfied for this stage of the development.
Prior to the Issuance of Occupancy Permits .
16.
An Administrative Plot Plan application for signage or a Sign Program shall be
submitted and approved by the Planning Director.
17.
Roof-mounted equipment shall be inspected to ensure it is shielded from ground
view.
18.
All landscaped areas shall be planted in accordance with approved landscape,
irrigation, and shading plans.
19.
The temporary access road slopes shall be hydroseeded and irrigated. The
Hydroseed ~ix shall be approved by the Planning Director.
20.
All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed and be
in a condition acceptable to the Director of Planning. The plants shall be
healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be
properly constructed and in good working order.
21.
The applicant shall obtain easements for the landscape planters located outside
the property along the eastern and southern property lines. The applicant shall
be responsible to maintain these planters until the parcel(s) immediately to the
R:\STAFFRPT~157PAS3.PC 4/28/94 edl 22
22.
east and south of the site are developed.
Each p~rking space reserved for the handicapped shall be identified by a
permanently affixed reflectorized sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded
text or equal, displaying the International Symbol of Accessibility. The sign
shall not be smaller than 70 square inches in area and shall be centered at the
interior end of the parking space at a minimum height if 80 inches from the
bottom of the sign to the parking space finished grade, or centered at a
minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space finished grade, ground, or
sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous place, at each entrance
to the off-street parking facility, not less than 17 inches by 22 inches, clearly
and conspicuously stating the following:
"Unauthorized vehicles not displaying distinguishing placards or
license plates issued for physically handicapped persons may be
towed away at owner's expense. Towed vehicles may be
reclaimed at or by telephone
23.
24.
25.-
26.
27.
In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall
have a surface identification sign duplicating the Symbol of Accessibility in blue
paint of at least 3 square feet in size.
Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Planning
to guarantee the installation of planrings, walls, and fences in accordance with
the approved construction plans, and adequate maintenance of the Planting for
one year, shall be filed with the Department of Planning~
The parking lot adjacent to Roripaugh Road for Chaparral High School shall be
installed.
A performance bond shall be secured to ensure the removal of the temporary
access road after the completion of the Winchester Road widening project. The
amount of this bond shall be determined by the Planning Director.
All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any
use allowed by this permit.
The applicant shall demonstrate by submittal of a written report that all
mitigation measures identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Program have been
satisfied for this stage of the develop~nent.
R:\STAFFRPT~157PA93.PC 4128/94 edl. 23
BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT
28.
Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly
upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way. All street lights and other
outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department
of Building and Safety for plan check approval and shall comply with the
requirements of Riverside County Ordinance No. 655.
29.
30.
Comply with applicable provisions of the 1991 edition of the Uniform Building,
Plumbing and Mechanical; 1990 National Electrical Code; California
Administrative Code Title 24 Energy and Handicapped Regulations and the
Temecula Code.
Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plan in
compliance with Ordinance Number 655 for the regulation of light pollution.
31.
Obtain all building plan and permit approvals prior to the commencement of any
construction work.
32.
Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings prior to submittal for plan
review.
33. All buildings and facilities must comply with applicable handicapped
accessibility regulations.
34.
Provide house electrical meter provisions for power for the operation of exterior
lighting, fire alarm systems.
35.
Restroom fixtures, number and type, shall be in accordance with the provisions
of the 1991 edition of the uniform plumbing code, Appendix C.
36.
Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on
plans submitted for plan review.
37.
Provide electrical plan including load calcs and panel schedule, plumbing
schematic and mechanical plan for plan review.
PUBLIC WORKS DE~PARTMENT
The following are the Department of Public Works Conditions of Approval for this
project, and shall be completed at no cost tO any Government Agency. All questions
regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the appropriate staff
person of the Department of Public Works.
It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the tentative site plan all
existing and proposed easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and
drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for
R:\STAFFRPT%157PA93.PC 4/28/94 sdl 24
further review and revision.
General Requirements
38.
39.
A Grading Permit for either rough or precise (including all onsite flat work and
improvements) grading shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works
prior to commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained road
right-of-way.
An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works
prior to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City
right-of-way.
40.
A copy of the grading and improvement plans, along with supporting hydrologic
and hydraulic calculations shall submitted to the Riverside County Flood Control
and Water Conservation District for approval prior. to the issuance of any
permit.
41.
All improvement plans, grading plans, landscape and irrigation plans shall be
coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements
contiguous to the site.
42. All plans shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars.
Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits:
43.
The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources
Control Board. No grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent
(NOI) has been filed or the project is shown to be exempt.
44.
As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall
receive written clearance from the following agencies:
State of California Water Resources Control Board
San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
Planning Department
Department of Public Works
Riverside County Health Depar{ment
Community Services District
General Telephone
Southern California Edison Company
Southern California Gas Company
R:\STAFFRPT~1STPA93.PC 4128/94 sdl 25
45.
46.
A Grading Plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and approved
by the. Department of_ Public Works. The plan shall comply with the Uniform
Building Code, Chapter 70, City Standards, and as additionally required in these
Conditions of Approval.
A Soils Report prepared by a registered Soils Engineer shall be submitted to the
Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall
address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the
construction of engineered structures and pavement sections.
47. An Erosion Control Plan in accordance with City Standards shall be designed by
a registered Civil Engineer and approved by the Department of Public Works.
48. The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the
grading and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City
Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works.
49.
50.
51.
52.
53.
54.
Permanent landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to the Planning
Department and the Department of Public Works for review.
Graded but undeveloped land shall be maintained in a weedfree condition and
shall be either planted with interim landscaping or provided with other erosion
control measures as approved by the Department of Public Works.
A permit from the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation
District is required for work within their right-of-way.
A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the prevailing
Area Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new development. The
charge is payable to Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation
District prior to issuance of any permit. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or
mitigation char. ge has been already credited to this property, no new charge
needs to be paid.
The Developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or slope easements
for offsite work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department
of Public Works.
A Flood Plain Development Permit and drainage study shall be submitted to the
Department of Public Works for review and approval. The drainage study shall
include, but not be limited to, the following criteria:
Drainage and flood protection facilities which will protect all structures
by diverting site runoff to streets or approved storm drain facilities as
directed by the Department of Public Works.
b. Adequate provision shall be made for the acceptance and disposal of
R:\STAFFRP'r~1STPA93.PC 4/28/94
55.
56.
57.
58.
59.
60.
surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas.
'~he impact to the site from any flood zone as shown on the FEMA flood
hazard map and any necessary mitigation to protect the site.
Identify and mitigate impacts of grading to any adjacent floodway.
The location of existing and post development 100oyear floodplain and
floodway shall be shown on the precise grading plan.
A drainage easement shall be obtained from the affected property owners for
the release of concentrated or diverted storm flows onto the adjacent property.
A copy of the drainage easement shall be submitted to the Department of Public
Works for review prior to recordation. The location of the recorded easement
shall. be delineated on the precise grading plan.
The Developer shall accept and properly dispose of all off-site drainage flowing
onto or through the site. In the event the Department of Public Works permits
the use of streets for drainage purposes, the provisions of Section XI of
Ordinance No. 460 will apply. Should the quantities exceed the street capacity,
or use of streets be prohibited for drainage purposes, the Developer shall
provide adequate facilities as approved by the Department of Public Works.
The site is in an area identified on the Flood Hazard Maps as Flood Zone "A"
and is subject to flooding of undetermined depths. Prior to the approval of any
plans, this project shall comply with Ordinance 91-12 of the City of Temecula
and with the rules and regulations of FEMA for development within a Flood
Zone "A" which may include obtaining a letter of map revision from FEMA.
The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an
Environmental Constraint Sheet. (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps
related to the subject property.
The extension of Roripaugh Road, west of Winchester Road, shall be a private
road. Roripaugh Road shall be designed, and approved by the Department of
Public Works, with 56 feet of asphalt concrete pavement within the dedicated
right-of-way in accordance with City Standard No. 110.
An offset cul-de-sac shall be designed, and approved by the Department of
Public Works, at the terminus of Re. ripaugh Road in accordance with City
Standard 600(A). Along the portion ~vhere no curb and gutter are proposed,
temporary A.C. berm shall be installed at the exterior curve to accommodate
positive drainage.
61. The Temporary Access Road shall be designed, and approved by the
Department of Public Works, with 36 feet of asphalt concrete pavement.
R:\STAFFRPT~157PA93.PC 4~28~94 sdl 27
62.
63.
64.
Six (6) foot wide sidewalk shall be constructed along the Temporary Access
Road an_d RoripaughRoad in accordance with City Standard Nos. 400 and 401.
Concentrated onsite runoff shall be conveyed in concrete ribbon gutters to an
adequate outlet as determined by the Department of Public Works.
Private roads MUST be designed, reviewed, and approved by the Department
of Public Works to meet City Public Road Standards or otherwise approved by
the Department of Public Works. This should include but may not be limited to:
C®
Separation between on-site intersections shall meet current City
Standards (200 feet minimum).
Minimum safe horizontal centerline radii shall be required in accordance
with City standard 113 or as otherwise approved by the Department of
Public Works (all centerline radii shall be identified on the site plan).
90° parking immediately adjacent to the private streets shall be located
a minimum safe distance from intersections.
Identify whether gates will be proposed at entrances to project. If so,
configuration, stacking distance, and turn-around ability will need to be
reviewed and approved by the Fire Department and the Department of
Public Works.
All intersections shall be perpendicular (90°).
All driveways providing access to two or more buildings shall be
designed as a cul-de-sac or a loop road.
Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00%
minimum over A.C. paving.
Street lights shall be installed along the public streets adjoining the site
in accordance with Ordinance 461 and shall be shown on the
improvement plans as directed by the Department of Public Works.
All reverse curves shall include a 100 foot minimum tangent section or
as otherwise approved by the Department of Public Works.
Private Street improvement plans shall include plan profiles showing
existing topography and utilities, and proposed centerline, top of curb
and flowline grades as directed by the Department of Public Works.
R:\STAFFRPT~157PA93.PC 4~28~94 adl 28
A construction area Traffic Control Plan shall be designed by a registered Civil
Enginee_r and revie_wed by the Department of Public Works for any street closure
and detour or other disruption to traffic circulation as required by the
Department of Public Works. Traffic shall remain open at all times and the
traffic control plan shall provide for adequate detour during construction.
Prior to the Issuance of Encroachment Permits:
66.
All necessary grading permit requirements shall have been accomplished to the
satisfaction of the Department of Public Works.
67.
Street improvement plans including parkway trees and street lights prepared by
a registered Civil Engineer and approved by the Department of Public Works
shall be required for all public streets prior to issuance of an Encroachment
Permit. Final plans and profiles shall show the location of exiting utility facilities
within the right-of-way as directed by the Department of Public Works.
68.
The following criteria shall be observed in the design of the improvement plans
and/or precise grading plans to be submitted to the Department of Public
Works:
a. Driveways shall conform to the City Standard No. 207A.
Concrete sidewalks and handicap ramps shall be constructed along public
street frontages in accordance with City Standard Nos. 400, 401, and
402.
Improvement plans shall extend 300 feet beyond the project boundaries
or as otherwise approved by the Department of Public Works.
All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees or
as approved by the Department of Public Works.
Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersections
and adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and
visibil!ty.
69.
A Signing anci Striping Plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and
approved by the Department of Public Works for Roripaugh Road, Margarita
Road, and the Temporary Access. Road and shall be included in the
improvement plans.
70.
The Developer shall construct or post security and an agreement shall be
executed guaranteeing the construction of the following public and private
improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to
approval by the Department of Public Works.
R:\STAFFRPT~157PA93.PC 4/28/94 edl. 29
Street improvements, which may include, but not limited to: pavement,
.c_urb and gutter, sidewalks, drive approaches, street lights, signing,
striping, and traffic control devices as appropriate
b. Storm drain facilities
c. Landscaping (slopes and parkways)
d. Sewer and domestic water systems
e. All trails, as required by the City's Master Plans
f. Undergrounding of proposed .Utility distribution lines
g. Erosion control and slope protection
Prior to Issuance of Building Permit:
71.
As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall
receive written clearance from the following agencies:
Riverside County Fire Department
Planning Department
Department of Public Works
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
72.
All necessary construction or encroachment permits have been
submitted/accomplished to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works.
73.
All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the Department of Public
Works
74.
All building pads shall be certified by a registered Civil Engineer forlocation and
elevation, and the Soil Engineer shall issue a Final Soils Report addressing
compaction and site conditions.
75.
This development must enter into an agreement with the City for a "Trip
Reduction Plan" in accordance with Ordinance No. 93-01.
76.
The Developer shall obtain an easement for ingress and egress over the
adjacent property.
77.
The Developer shall notify the City's Cable T.V. Franchises of the intent to
develop. Conduit shall be installed to Cable T.V. Standards prior to issuance
of Certificate of Occupancy.
R:\STAFFRPT~,157PA93.PC 4/28/94 sdl 30
Prior to Issuance of Certification of Occupancy:
78, As dee~ed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall
receive written clearance from the following agencies:
Rancho California Water District
Eastern Municipal Water District
General Telephone
Southern 'California Edison
Southern California Gas
Planning Department
Department of Public Works
Riverside County Flood ContrOl and Water Conservation District
79.
All improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans
and City standards, including but not limited to curb and gutter, A.C. pavement,
sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway trees, street lights on all interior
public/private streets, signing, and striping as directed by the Department of
Public Works.
80. The extension of Roripaugh Road, west of Winchester Road, shall be
constructed in accordance with City Standard No. 110.
81.
An offset cul-de-sac shall be constructed at the terminus of Roripaugh Road in
accordance with City Standard 600(A).
82. The Temporary Access Road shall be constructed.
83.
Six foot wide sidewalk shall be constructed along the Temporary Access Road
and Roripaugh Road in accordance with City Standard Nos. 400 and 401.
84.
In the event road or off-site right-of-way are required 'to comply-with these
conditions, such easements shall be obtained by the Developer; or,'in the event
the City is required to condemn the easement or right-of-way, as provided in
the Subdivision Map Act, the Developer shall enter into an agreement with the
City for the acquisition of such easement at the Developer's cost pursuant to
Government Code Section 66462.5, which shall be at no cost to the City.
85.
Dedicate a 36 foot wide easement for public utilities and emergency vehicles
access for all private streets and drives.
86.
The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or
broken due to the construction operations of this project shall be repaired or
removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works.
R:\STAFFRPT~157PA93.PC 4/28/94 edl. 3 1
87.
All necessary certifications and clearances from engineers, utility companies
and public agencies shall be submitted as required by the Department of Public
Works.
OTHER AGENCIES
88.
Flood protection shall be provided in accordance with the Riverside County
Flood Control District's transmittal dated April 4, 1994, a copy of which is
attached.
89.
Fire protection shall be provided in accordance with the appropriate section of
Ordinance No. 546 and the County Fire Warden's transmittal dated August 3,
1993, a copy of which is attached..+
90.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the
Department of Transportation transmittal dated August 12, 1993, a copy of
which is attached.
91.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Eastern
Municipal Water district transmittal dated August 16, 1993, a copy of which
is attached.
92.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Rancho
Water transmittal dated March 22, 1994, a copy of which is attached.
R:\STAFFRPT%lS7PA93.PC 4/28/94 edl 32
rzmN~51%14. MANAeI~e-CNIEF
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND
WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
Ladies and Gentlemen:
RECEIVED
APR 0 5 199 f
Ans'd ............
This project may require a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board.
Clearance for grading, recordation, or other final approval, should not be given until the City has determined that the project has been granted a
permit or is shown to be exempt.
If this project involves a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) mapped flood plain, then the City should require the applicant to
provide all studies, calculations, plans and other information required to meet FEMA requirements, and should further require that the applicant
obtain a Conditional Letter of Map Revi.~on (CLOMR) prior to grading, recordalton or other final approval of the project, and a Letter of Map
Revision (LOM R) prior to cx:cupancy.
If a natural walercourse or mapped flood plain is impacted by this project the City should require the applicant to obtain a Section 160111603
Agreement from the Caiifomia Department of Fish and Game and a Clean Water Act Section 404 permit from the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers, or written corres~ from these agerides indicating the project is exempt from these requirements. A Clean Water Act Section
404 Water Quality Cerlilication may be required from the local California Regional Water Quality Control Board prior to issuance of the Corps
404 permit.
Very truly yours,
_.~C)f DUSTY WILUAMS
Senior Civil Engirmer
4--1-94-
GFNFRAL INFORMATION
radiities, other regional flood contrd and drainage facilffies which could be considered a logical ~ or extension of a master plan system,
and Distdct Area Drainage Ran fees (development mitigation fees). In addition, information of a general nature is provided.
The District has not reviewed the propo__eed_ project in detail and ~e fallowing Chedr, ed comments do not in any way constitute or imply District
approval or endorsement of the proposed project with respect to flood hazard, public health and safety or any other such issue:
JThis project would not be impacted by District Master Drainage Ran fadlitjas nor are olher fadlffias of regional interest proposed.
"]This project involves District Master Ran facilities. The District will accept ownership of such radiities on written request ot the City. Facilities
must be constructed to District standards, and District plan chec~ and inspection will be required for District acceptance. Ran check,
inspection and administrative fees will be required.
"]This project proposes channels, storm drains 36 inches or larger in diameter, or other facilities 1hat could be considered regional in n;
anclJor a logical extension of The adopted Master Drainage Ran. The District would consider accep~.,
ownership of such radiities on writtan request of the City. Facilities must be cortstmctad to District standards, and District plan chec~ and
inspection will be required for District acceptance. Ran Check, inspec~on and administrative fees will be required.
F"'~This project is located within the limits of the District's Area Drainage Ran for which drainage
fees have been adopted; applicable fees should be paid to the Rood Control District or City prior to final approval of the project, or in the case
of a parcel map or subdivision prior to recordation of the final map. Fees to be paid should be at the rate in effect at the time of recordation,
or if deferred, at the time of issuance of the actuai permit.
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
%"" ;--FIRE DEPARTMENT
HARRIS 210 WEST SAN JACINTO AVENUE * PERRIS, CALIFORNIA 92570 · (909) 657-3183
TO:
ATTN:
RE:
Temecula Planning Department
Saied Naaseh
.PA93-0157
August 3, 1993
With respect to the conditions of approval'for the above refer-
enced plot plan, the Fire Department recommends the following
fire protection measures be provided in accordance with Riverside
County Ordinances and/or recognized fire protection standards:
i. The Fire Department is required to set a minimum fire
flow for tire remodel or construction of all commercial
buildings using the procedure establisi-,ed in Ordinance 546.
2. Provide or show there exists a water system capable of
delivering 2250 GF'M for a 2 hour duration at 20 PSI residual
operating pressure, wk~Xch must be available before any
combustible material i=- placed on the job site.
3. A combination of on-site and off-site super fire hy-
drants, on a loooeO system (6"x4"x2 1/2":.'.2 1/2"), will be
located not less than ~ feet or more than 165 feet ~rom any
portion of the building as measured along approved vehicular
tr-a:..~e].ways. The reo. uired fire flow shall be av'aiiable from
any aOj acent hydrant ( s ) in the system.
4. Blue dot reflectors shall be mounted in private streets
and driveways to indicate location of fire hydrants. They
shall be 'mounted in the middle of the street directly in
line with fire hydrants.
5. The required fire flow m~y be adjusted at a later point
in the permit process to r6flect changes in oesign, con-
struction type, area seOara~ien or built-in fire protection
measures.
~] RIVERSIDE OFFICE
3760 12th S~reet, Riverside, CA 92501
(909) 275-4777 · FAX (909) 369-7451
FIRE PREVENTION DIVISION
PLANNING SECTION
[~ INDIO OFFICE
79-733 Counu7 Club Drive, Suite F, Indio, CA 92201
(619) 863-8886 * FAX (619) 863-7072
,e.nnte~ ode n.e'yded peime~'~
~. Aoplicant/OeveloOer shall furnish one copy of the water
system plans to the Fire Department for review. Plans shall
conform to the fire hydrant types, location and spacing, and
the .~ystem s~a_!l meet the fire flow requirements. Plans
shall be signed/approved by a registered civil engineer and
the local water company with the following certification: "I
certify that the design of the water system is in accordance
with the reOuirements prescribed by the Riverside Coutnty
Fire Department".
7. Install a complete fire sprinkler system in all build-
ings. The post indicator valve and fire deOartment connec-
'~'ior. sha~l be located ~n the front, within 5o feet of a
hydrant, and a minimum of 25 feet from the building(s). A
statement that the building(s) will be automatically fire
sprinkled must be included on the title page of the building
plans.
Aoolicant/developer shal~ be responsible to insta~
fire alarm s>stem. Plans must be submitted to ~he Fire
Department for approval prior to installation.
9. A statement that the building will be automatically fire
s0rinklered must apprear. on the title page of the building
oians.
i0. Occupancy separation will be required as per the
form Building Coda, Section 503.
Uni-
21. Prior to final impsection of any building, the appli-
cant shall mremare ann submit to the Fire Depar*cment for
-c, op',-ovai, a site plan designating required fire lanes with
aFz. mropriate lane painting and or sions.
22. install portable fire e,','tinguishers with a minimum
rati!,qg of 2A~0~;C. Con!iact a certified extinguisher company
for F:;rc, per placement of e,3ulpment.
23. Amr-,iicant/develooer shall be responsible for- obtaining
underoround o~- a'boveground permits from both the County
r.~c,~ ..... aF~d ire Departments.
14. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the appli-
cant/developer shall be responsible to submit a check or
mon.e'~., order in the amount c,f $558.,:)t> to the Riverside County
Fire De~o~rtment for plan check fees. Please reference Plan
Check Number with remittance.
/5. Prior to the issuance o'f building p~rmits, the deveioO-
er shall deposit, wi[h the ~ity of Temecuia, a check or
money or~er e~ualing the su~i c,f ~.25 met smuare foc, t as
rnltlaalion for fire protection impacts. This amount must be
submZ~tad separately from the ~lan check fees.
18. Final conditions will be addressed when building
are reviewed in the building and Safety Office.
plans
All questions regarding the meaning of conditions shall
ferred to the Planning and Engineering Staff.
be re-
RAYMOND H. REGIS
Chief Fire Department Planner
Laura Cabral,
Fire Safety Specialist
Fire Captain Specialist
~A~ OF' CALIFORNIA---BUSINESS, TRANSPORTATIC~ AND HOUSING AGEN~
D~PART/~ENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DISTRICT 8, P.O. BOX 231
SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92402
TDD (909} 383-4609
PETE WILSON, Goremot
e
August 12, 1993
Development Review
08-Riv-79-R3.45~
Your Reference:
PA 93-0157
RECEIVED
AUG 18 1993
Ans 'd .............
Mr. Saied Naaseh
Planning Department
City of Temecula
City Hall
43172 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92390
Dear Mr. Naaseh:
Thank you for the opportunity to review the proposed
Planning Application 93-0157 located northerly of Highway 79
(Winchester Road), between Margarita Road and Roripaugh Road in
Temecula.
Please refer to the attached material on which our comments
have been indicated by the items checked and/or by those items
noted under additional comments.
If any work is necessary within the State highway right of
way, the developer must obtain an encroachment permit from the
Caltrans District 8 Permit Office prior to beginning work.
Please be advised that this is a conceptual review only.
Final approval of street improvement, grading and drainage will
be determined during the Encroachment Permit process.
If additional information is desired, please call Mr. Ahmad
Salah of our Development Review Section at (714) 383-5908.
Very truly yours,
G.A. LUNT
Branch Chief
Development Review
_~_JI.T~TRAMB DIt'VRTa~PI~.NT plelq'wlf .FOP1(
YOUR REFERENCE
~It,,O'VTDIE TO
Pure 'CNeas ' ( Co RTE PM)
WE RBQUBBT THaT THE ZTEMB CliE~KED BELOW BB ZNCLUDED Z3~ TIZB COBDZTZONB OF
APPROVAL FOR THIS PP.O~TECT: .,
N01UeL RIGHT OF %dAY DEDICATION TO PROVIDE
HALF--MIDTH ON THE STATE HIGINAT,
NORHAL STREET INPROVEHENTS TO PROVIDE
HALF-'VIDTH ON THE STATE HIGHMAY.
CURB AND GUTTER, STATE STANDARD A87 , TYPE A2-8 ALONG THE STATE HIGHMAY.
PARKING SHALL BE PROHIBITED ALONG THE STATE HIGHMAY BY THE PRC)PER PLACEMENT OF NO PARKING SIGNS.
35 FT UDIUS CUR1 REMUS SHALL BE PROVIDED AT INTERSECTIONS MITH THE STATE HIGHMAY. STATE STANDARD
NGP A88, CABF.-A I,IHEELCHAIR RN4PS SHALL BE PROVIDED IN THE CURB RETURNS AS DEFINED IN THE HIGHMAY
DESTG. HANUAL, SECTZGN 105.4 (2).
A POSITIVE VEHICULAR BARRIER ALONG THE PROPERTY FRONTAGE SHALL BE PROVIDED TO LIMIT PHYSICAL ACCESS TO THE
STATE HIGHIdAT.
VEHICULAR ACCESS SHALL NOT BE DEVELOPED DIRECTLY TO THE STATE HIGliVAY.
VEHICULAR ACCESS TO THE STATE HIGliVAY SHALL BE PROVIDED BY EXISTING PUBLIC ROAD COMNECTIOHS.
VEHICULAR ACCESS TO THE STATE HIGHUAT SHALL BE PROVIDED IT
STANDARD DRIVE!dAYS.
VEHIOJI.AR ACI:F.$S SHALL NOT BE PROVIOED MITHIN
OF TIE INTEI~r~ICll AT
VEHICLILAI _arrsSS TO THE STATE NIGINAY SHALL I[ IqtOVIDED IT A ROAD--TYPE CI:)NNECTIOH,
VEHICULAR ACCESS COIINECTIOHS SHALL IE PAVED AT LEAST MITHIN THE STATE HIGHVAT RIGHT OF MAY.
A(:Z:~$S POINTS TO THE STATE HIGINAY SHALL BE DEVELOPED IN A HANNER THAT MILL PROVIDE SIGHT DISTANCE FOR
ALONG THE STATE .HIGINAY.
LANDSCAPING ALONG THE STATE HIGHMAY SHALL PROVIDE FOR SAFE SIGHT DISTANCEt COMPLY MITH FIXED OBJECT SET BACK
AND BE TO STATE STANDARDS.
A LEFT--TUIN LANEr INCLt.i)ING SHOULDERS AND ANY NECESSARY MIDENINGt SHALL BE PROVIDED ON THE STATE NIGHtdAY.
.,, o,,-,,,, ,,o., ,,,,,,.. ,,,...,.,., ....,
A
PARKING SHALL BE DEVELOPED IN A HANNER THAT MILL I~T CAUSE ANY VEHICUI. JUt MOVB4ENT COIIFLICTS; INCLUDING PARKING
/:L~ ENTRANCE AND EXITe MITHIN OF THE ENTRANCE FROH THE STATE HIGHMAY,
SHALL BE TAKEN ie'HEN DEVELOPING THIS PROPERTT TO PRESERVE AND PERPETUATE THE EXISTING DRAINAGE PATTERN
OF THE STATE NIGINAY, PARTICULAR CQNSIDERATION $HOJLD BE GIVEN TO CLINLATIVE INCREASED $TCiUe RUleFF TO ]NSURE
THAT A HIGHMAY DRAINAGE PRORLEN IS NOT CREATED. ,
PLRASE REFER TO ATTACHED ADOITIONAL (:~NTS. PROVIDE TO APPLICANT.
PLEASe B~e ZnVTSND THAT THT2 T8 A CONCwPTUAT. pwVI'leW O~.Y. FT~T. AppRO~T. fiLL
BE DE~T~n D~TNG R ~A~~ pRaTT P~BB.
'fil"g FOT,T.r"qrrNG T'IrII~.B/S~IK A~pT.TC]~T.'Ie '1"O T,nOIT. ]kGR'NQY l=nvslllPe:RB/wNgT:!rleleRB
CONSTRUCTION/DEMOLITION HITHEN PRESENT OR PRMSED STATE lIGHT OF MAT SNCULD BE INVESTIGATED FOR POTENTIAL
HAZARDOUS HASTE ( I.E.ASKSTON; PETROCHENICALS; ETC.) AND NITIGATED AS PER REOUIRB4ENTS OF REGULAT~Y AGENCIES.
WHEN PLANS ARE SUIIITTED; PLEASE COIlFORM TO TIE BEGUIREMEHTS OF TIE ATTACHED nJiANDCUTn. THIS UILL EXPEDITE
THE REVIEW PROCESS AND TIHE REQUIIB) FOR PLAN CHECg. PROVIDE TO APPLICANT,
ALTHOUGH THE TRAFFIC AND/ON DRAINAGE GENERATED BY THIS PltCI~SAL DO NOT APPEAR TO NAVE A SIGNIFICANT EFFECT
ON THE STATE HIGINAY STSTE!I; CONSIDERATION ledST BE GIVEN TO THE Cl/4JLATIVE EFFECT OF CONTINUED DEVELOPI4ENT
IN THIS AREA. ANY HEASURES NECESSARY TO NITIrATE THE ClJ4ULATIVE ]I4PACT OF TRAFFIC AND/ON DRAINAGE SHALL BE
PROVIDED PRION TO ON UITH DEVELOPHINT OF THE AREA THAT NECESSITATES THEHe
CONSIDERATION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE PROVISION; OR FUTURE PROVISION; OF SIGNIL2ZATION AND LIGHTING OF THE
lhT'~a~b-'Tl3~ OF ~ T}E STA~__ HI=~.AY ~ ~ aa~
IT APPEARS THAT THE TRAFFIC AND/ON DRAINAGE GENERATED BY THIS PROPOSAL COULD HAVE A SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON
THE STATE HIGIf,/AY $YSTEH OF THE AREA° bY 14EASURES TO NITIrATE THE TRAFFIC AND/ON DRAINAGE IMPACTS SHALL BE
INCLUDED UITH THE DEVELOPHINT.
THiS PORTION OF THE STATE HIGHWAY IS INCLUDED IN THE CALIFONNIA MASTER lib. AN OF STATE PZIGHUAYS ELIGIBLE FON
OFFICIAL SCENIC Z'ZIGHIdAY DESIGNAT]ON AND IN THE FUTURE YOUR AGENCY NAY i/]$H TO NAVE THIS ROUTE OFFICIALLY
DESIGNATED AS A STATE SCENIC PZIGHMATo
THIS PORTlOll OF THE STATE HIGHMAY HAS BEEN OFFICIALLY DESIGNATED AS A STATE SCENIC HIGHUAY; AND DEVELC~NT
IN THIS CORRIDOR SHOULD BE ClIPAT[BLE IdtTH THE SCENIC NIGJ&IAY CONCEPT.
IT iS ~ECUemIZED THAT TIIERE IS CX3NSIDERABLE RILIC COlIC!Ill ADCUT MOISE I.EV~LI ADJACBIT TO HEAVILY TIAVELLED
HIGHMATS. LIID DEVELCeg!ENTt IN CIDER TO BE Cl)~ATIILE MITII THIS I:ZiK/RN; NAY REOUIIE IIm~CIAL MOISE ATTEMUATION
HEAm. IES. DEVELORENT OF THIS PROItltTT ~ l~ ~ff ~ 80111 A17EIJaTION.
PLEASE 8FRD ~ TTEM8 C'HECF~-D nl~T~W TO x
CAZ,T~IL~S DISTRICT 8
DEVELDP!IBIT I~rVIB,/B~JUiC,
P.O. ]klx 231
SAN BERNAROi,O, C~ 92402
A coPY OF ANY CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ON REVISE/) APPROVAL.
COPY OF ANY DOOJqENTS PROVIDING ADDITIONAL STATE HIGINAY RIGHT OF MAY UPON RECORDATION OF THE NAP.
'
AJ~Y PROPOSALS TO FURTHER DE~/ELOP THIS PROPERTY.
:
A COPY OF THE TRAFFIC ON ENVIRONHENTAL STUDY.
CHECK PRINT OF THE PARCEL ON TRACT NAP.
CHECK PRINT OF THE PLANS FON ANY INPROVEMEHTS MITH]H ON ADJACENT TO THE STATE HIGHWAY RIGHT OF MAY.
CHECK PRINT OF THE GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLANS FOR THIS PROPEITY UHEN AVAILABLE.
Eastern Municipal Water District
August 16, 1993
RECEIVED
Saied Naaseh, Case Planner
City of Temecula
Planning Department
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
SUBJECT: Temecula Valley Unified School District
Facility (Pl 93-0157)
AUG18 1993
Ans'd ............
Operations
Dear Mr. Naaseh::
We have reviewed the materials transmitted by your office which
describe the subject project. Our comments are outlined below:
General
It is our understanding the subject project is a proposed 5.4 acre
transportation/maintenance/operations facility, lecated adjacent to
the Santa Gertrudis Creek channel, approximately 500 ft north of
Margarita Rd.
The subject project is located within the District's sanitary sewer
service area. However, it must be understood the available
capabilities of the District's systems are continually changing due
to the occurrence of development within.the District and programs
of systems improvement. As such, the provision of service will be
based on the detailed plan of service requirements, the 'timing of
the subject project, the status of the District's permit to
operate, and the service agreement between the District and the
developer of the subject project.
The developer must arrange for the preparation of a detailed plan
of service. The detailed plan of service will indicate the
location(s) and size(s) of system improvements to be made by the
developer (or others), and which are considered necessary in order
to provide adequate levels of gervice. To arrange for the
preparation of a plan of service, the developer should submit
information describing the subject project to the District's
Customer Service Department, (909) 925-7676, extension 409, as
follows:
1. Written request for a "plan of service".
Mail To: Post Office Box 8300 · SanJacinto, California 92581-8300 · Telephone (909) 925-7676 · Fax (909) 929-0257
Main Office: 2045 S. San Jacinto Avenue, San Jacinto · Customer Service/Engineering Annex: 440 E. Oakland Avenue, Hernet, CA
Saied Naaseh
PA 93-0157
August 16; 1993
Page 2
Minimum $400.00 deposit (larger deposits may be required
for extensive development projects or projects located in
"difficult to serve" geographic areas).
Plans/maps describing the exact location and nature of
the subjec~ project. Especially helpful materials
include grading plans and phasing plans.
Sanitary Sewer
The subject project is considered tributary to the District's
Temecula Valley Regional Water Reclamation Facility (TVRWRF).
The nearest existing TVRWRF system sanitary sewer facilities to the
subject project are as follows:
15-inch diameter sewer aligned along Winchester Rd. between
Margarita and Nicolas Rds.
Recently constructed collector sewer aligned along Margarita
Rd., west of Winchester Rd. and crossing the Santa Gertrudis
Creek. (Note, this sewer has not been placed in-service as of
this date.)
Other Issues
The representative of the subject project must contact the
District's Customer Service Department to arrange for a plan check
and field inspection of onsite plumbing.
Should you have any questions regarding these comments, please feel
free to contact this office at (909) 925-7676, extension 468.
Very truly yours,
EASTERN. MUN~CIP~/~WATER
David G. Crosley
DISTRICT
DGC/cZ
AB 93-869
(wp-ntwk-PA930157.clz)
Wa r
Board 6f Dlrecto~Ts
Doug Ku]berg
· Jeffrey L. Minklet
Ralph H, Daily
Nancy K. Hughes
Csaha F. Ko
Lisa D. Peter,~on
Richard D. Steffo)
Phillip L. Forbes
March 22, 1994
Mr. Saied Naaseh
City of Temecula
Planning Department
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590-3606
HAR 2 9 Bgz
Water Availability
Maintenance, Operations, Transportation (MOT) Facility
Temecula Valley Unified School District
Dear Mr. Naaseh:
Please be advised that the above-referenced property is located within the
boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD). Water service,
therefore, would be available upon completion of financial arrangements
between RCWD and the property owner.
Water availability would be contingent upon the property owner signing an
Agency Agreement which assigns water management fights, if any, to RCWD.
If you have any questions, please contact Ms. Senga Doherty.
Sincerely,
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT
Steve Brannon, P.E.
Devel6pment Engineering Manager
Se:SO:mglS/F186
cc: Senga Doherty, Engineering Technician
Rancho California Water District
42 i::.% XXlnch,.ster R.ad · Post Office, Bi}x 9017 * Temecula. California 925S9-9017 * rShqg, 676-4101 * F.-LX ,909,676-0615
J
ATTACHMENT NO. 4
EXHIBITS
R:\STAFFRPT%157PA93.PC 4/28/94 edl ;3:3
CITY OF TEMECULA
CASE NO.: PA93-0157 AND PA94-0002
EXHIBIT: A
~.C. DATE: MAY 2, 1994
VICINITY MAP
R:\STAFFRPT~157PA93.PC 4/26/94 sdl
CITY OF TEMECULA
/
/
CASE NO.: PA93-0157 AND PA94-0002
EXHIBIT: B
P.C. DATE: MAY 2, 1994
ZONING MAP
R:\STAFFRPT~,157PA93.PC 4/26/94 "dl
CITY OF TEMECULA
CASE NO.: PA93-0157 AND PA94-0002
EXHIBIT: C
'LC. DATE: MAY 2, 1994
SITE PLAN
R:\STAFFRPT~157PA93.PC 4/26/94
CITY OF TEMECULA
CASE NO.: PA93-0157 AND PA94-0002
EXHIBIT: D
P.C. DATE: MAY 2, 1994
LANDSCAPE PLAN
R:\STAFFRPT%157PA93.PC 4/26/94 sdl
CITY OF TEMECULA
CASE NO.: PA93-0157 AND PA94-0002
EXHIBIT: E
'.C. DATE: MAY 2, 1994
ELEVATIONS
R:\STAFFRPT~157PA93.PC 4/26/94 edl
CITY OF TEMECULA
CASE NO.: PA93-0157 AND PA94-0002
EXHIBIT: F
P.C. DATE: MAY 2, 1994
ELEVATIONS
R:\STAFFRPT~157PA93.pC 4/26/94 sdl
CITY OF TEMECULA
CASE NO.: PA93-0157 AND PA94-0002
EXHIBIT: G
".C. DATE: MAY 2, 1994
FLOOR PLAN
R:\STAFFRP'l'%157PA93,PC 4/26/94
CITY OF TEMECULA
! ] Ol~l:l:llllllll:tl:lll;llll::~
CASE NO.: PA93-0157 AND PA94-0002
EXHIBIT: H
P.C. DATE: MAY 2, 1994
OVERALL SITE PLAN
R:~STAFFRPT~157PA93.pC 4/26/94
ATTACHMENT NO. 5
FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING
CONSIDERATIONS
R:\STAFFRPT~157PA93.PC 4/28/94 edl 34
FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING
CONSIDERATIONS REGARDING ~ FINAL
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
(STATE CLEA. RINGHOUSE NUMBER 93092023)
FOR TRE TEMECULA V, aLLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT,
MAINTENANCE, OPERATIONS AND TRANSPORTATION FACH~vFY
(PLANNING APPLICATION 94-0002)
The City of Temecula (the "City") hereby certifies the Temecula Valley Unified
School District, Maintenance, Operations and Transportation Facility, Final
Environmental Impact Report, State Clearinghouse Number 93092023, which consists
of the Draft EIR, the Response to Comments on the Draft EIR, the Mitigation
Monitoring ProgrRm~ these Findings of Fact, the Staff Report and any associated
attachments (collectively referred to as the "Final EIR"), and fin& that it has been
completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (Public
Resource Code Section 21000, et seq.) CCEQA") and that the City of Temecula has
received, reviewed and considered the information contained in the Final EIR, all
hearings, and submissions of testimony from officials and Departments of the City,
the Applicant, the public and other municipalities and agencies.
Having received, reviewed and considered the foregoing information, as well as
any and all information in the record, the City of Temecula hereby makes these
Findings of Fact pursuant to, and in accordance with Section 21081 of the Public
Resource Code as follows:
BACKGROUND
The Temecula Valley Unit~ed School District, Maintenance, Operations and
Transportation Facility (the "proposed project") involves of a total of 24,399 interior
square feet for various transportation, administrative and maintenance activities.
Storage space will also be provided for 40 school buses and 75 maintenance vehicles
as well as a fuel and wash island for District vehicles.
The transportation portion of the facility wffi involve 10,863 square feet of
space for six bus repair bays with associated repair and storage areas. Surrounding
the transportation portion of the facility are the 40 bus storage stalls. Although
storage will be pro,ided for 40 buses, the Temecula Valley Unified School District
anticipates that a maximum of 29 buses wffi be operational at any one time. During
the morning hours, a maximum of 29 buses out of the 40-bus fleet will be in
operation. After noon, a maximum of 10 buses will be in operation. Buses will warm
up and depart the site at staggered times within these periods.
The sdministration portion of the facility will involve 5,939 interior square feet
of office space for District administrative functions and wffi generally operate between
the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m.
The maintenance portion of the proposed facility consists of 6,035 square feet
of repair shops performing plumbing, heating/air conditioning repair, carpentry,
electrical, lo~-i~=mith, irdkation and landscape maintenance functions. This pertion
of the facility will be operational between the hours of 6:45 a.m. and 3:30 p.m. An
additional 1,562 square feet of common area containing compressors, lubrication and
welding equipment will also be provided. A fuel and wash island will be included on-
site to serve District vehicles. Dispensing facilities for compressed and natural gas of
use in motor vehicles is being considered for the fuel island.
In addition to the. 40 bus storage stalls noted above, the proposed
transportation, srlminlstration and maintenance facility will also contain 75 parking
spaces for maintenance vehicles, 10 visitor parking stalls adjacent to the
Administration portion of the proposed f_s_r61ity and a separate, outdoor storage area
for lawn mowers and other landscape equipment. The proposed project is anticipated
to involve a total of approximately 96 employees at the initiation of operations in 1994
which will increase to 116 employees by the year 2010.
In addition to certification of the Final Environmental Impact Report, the City
of Temecula must approve a Conditional Use Permit (Planning Application 93-0157)
for the proposed project.
The City of Temecula circulated copies of the Notice of Preparation (NOP) for
the proposed project in September, 1993 to all Responsible Agencies and interested
groups and individuals stating that a Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) will
be prepared. Various agencies and individuals provided written comments within the
State-mandated 30 day public review period for the NOP. These written comments
discussed the scope and content of information to be contained within the Draft EIR.
Copies of these comments on the NOP are contained within Appendix A of the Draft
EIR.
The Draft' Environm'ental Impact. Report (Draft EIR) for the Temecula Valley
Unified School District, Maintenance, Operations and Transportation Fadlity was
initially submitted to the City of Temecula on September 27, 1993.
During the months of September, 1993 through February, 1994 and subsequent
to the public review of the Notice of Preparation, the City of Temecula internally
reviewed "screencheck" copies of the Draft EIR. Upon completion of this review,
copies of the Draft EIR were forwarded to all Responsible Agencies and interested
groups and individuals. As was also the case for the Notice of Preparation, the Draft
EIR was forwarded to the State Clearinghouse for distribution to and review by
various involved State agencies. The State:mandated 45-day public review of the
Draft EIR began on February 22, 1994 and ended on April 8, 1994. A Responses to
Comments package has been prepared which presents written responses to comments
received as a result of the public review of the Draft EIR. This Responses to
Comments package is included as part of the Final Environmental Impact Report.
T~EENVIRONMENTALIMPACTREPORT
An Initial Study for the Temecula Valley Unit~ed School District, Maintenance,
Operations and Transportation Fa_rdlity was prepared by the City of Temecula on
August 27, 1993, which identified potential environmental impacts attributable to the
proposed project. These potential impacts include: Seismic Safety; Slopes and
Erosion; Noise; Climate and Air Quality; Circulation; Hydrology; Water Quality; Risk
of Upset; Cultural and Scientffic Resources; W~dlifeNegetation; Land Use; Toxic
Substances; Aesthetics/Light and Glare; Natural and Energy Resources; Public
Facilities and Services (water and sewer, fire protection, police protection, utilities and
solid waste); Growth-Inducing Impacts and Cumulative Impacts. In addition, the
Initial Study identified the necessity to analyze Project Alternatives and provide a
Mitigation Monitoring Program. As a result of the Initial Study, it was determined
that the proposed project may have a significant effect on the environment and an
Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was required.
The Final EIR analyzed both project and cumulative effects of the potential
environmental impacts identified in the Initial Study. The Final EIR developed and
identified a variety of mitigation measures to minimize, reduce, avoid or compensate
for the potential adverse effects of the proposed project.
The Final EIR also discussed a number ofpetential alternatives to the proposed
project, including the: 1) the No Project Alternative; 2) the Commercial Land Use
Alternative; 3) the Business Park Land Use Alternative; and 4) Alternate Project
Sites.
The Draft Environmental Impact Report was circulated for public review by the
City of Temecula between the dates of February 22, 1994 and April 8, 1994 in
conformance with Section 15086, et.seq. of the State CEQA Guidelines. This 45-day
public review period (per Section 15087 (c) of State CEQA Guidelines) resulted in the
receipt of comments from a variety of governmental agencies and other responsible
parties. Responses to the comments received regarding the proposed project and the
Draft EIR were prepared, and then reviewed and revised by City staff. This
Responses to Comments package is included in the Final EIR.
Public hearings will be held on the project proposal and its associated
environmental impacts by the City of Temecula prior to the certification of the Final
EIR.
The City of Temecula makes the foRowing findings in adopting a Resolution
certifying the Final Environmental Impac~ Report. Section i of these Findings
contains the Statement of Overriding Considerations. Section 2 discusses those
potential environmental effects of the proposed project which are not significant or
which have been mitigated to a level of insignificance. Section 3 discusses the
significant unavoidable environmental effects of the proposed project which c~nnot be
feasibly mitigated to a level of insignificance. Section 4 discusses the growth-inducing
impacts of the proposed project. Section 5 discusses the alternatives to the proposed
project discussed in the Final EIR. Section 6 discusses the Mitigation Monitoring
Program for the proposed project. Section 7 contains the Section 15091 and 15092
findingS. The fllldillgs set forth in each section are supported by substantial evidence
in the aclminqstrative rdc0rd of the proposed project. Appendix A to this Findings
package contains a copy of the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the proposed
project.
SECTION 1
"STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS
The Final EIR identified and discussed significant effects which will occur as
a result of the proposed project. With the implementation of the mitigation measures
discussed in the Final EIR, these effects can be mitigated to levels of insignificance
except for project-related unavoidable. significant impacts in the areas of Seismic
Safety, Climate and Air Quality, Hydrology and Land Use as identified in Section 3
of these Findings.
Having reduced the effects of the proposed project by adopting Conditions of
Approval and monitored mitigation measures and having balanced the benefits of the
proposed project against the proposed project's potential unavoidable adverse impacts,
the City of Temecula hereby determines that the benefits of the proposed project
outweigh the potential unavoidable adverse impacts, and that the unavoidable adverse
impacts are nonetheless "acceptable" based on the following Overriding
Considerations:
1. The proposed project will assist and enhance the operations of the
Temecula Valley Unified School District through the construction of a combined
Maintenance, Operations and Transportation Facility. As such, transportation,
administrative and maintenance functions will be integrated into one site.
2. This centrally-located facility wffi most efficiently serve the
transportation, administrative and maintenance needs of the School District and its
students.
3. The proposed project will be required to construct all required on- and
off-site infrastructure improvements in a coordinated fashion which is consistent with
surrounding land uses.
4. On-site fueling facilities will be designed to provide for the opportunity
in the future for the dispensing of alternate fuels (compressed natural gas) for District
and other government vehicles in the future. Availability of these alternate fuels will
reduce the reliance. upon petroleum fuels and the associated air pollution impacts.
5. During the life of the project, it is anticipated that an additional 20
employment opportunities will be generated. These jobs are in addition to the
existing number of employees who will be working on-site at the initiation of project
operations.
SECTION 2 -
POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS WHICH ARE NOT
SIGNIFICANT OR WHICH HAVE BEEN MITIGATED
TO A LEVEL OF INSIGNIFICANCE
All Final EIR mitigation measures (as set forth in the Mitigation Monitoring
Program attached as Appendix A to these Findings) have been incorporated by
reference into the Conditions of Approval for the proposed Temecula Valley Unified
School District, Maintenance, Operations and Transportation Facility.
The City of Temecula has determined that these mitigation measures and
Conditions of Approval will result in a substantial mitigation of the following effects
and that these effects are not considered signfficant or they have been mitigated to
a level of insignificance. The mitigation measures referred to below are contained
within the Mitigation Monitoring Program which is attached as Appendix A to these
Findings.
Seismic Safety
Potential Impact: The site will be impacted by seismic activity along the Wildomar
fault which is located approximately 1.4 miles southwest of the project. It is
estimated that a 7.5 earthquake along the Elsinore fault zone could create a maximum
peak ground acceleration on-site of 0.70g.
Findings: Conditions of Approval, monitored mitigation measures, and features
incorporated into the proposed project design will reduce the impacts identified in the
Final EIR to an insignificant level.
Facts:- The above Finding is made in that Mitigation Measures 1 and 2 within Section
A. Seismic Safety of the Mitigation Monitoring Program will mitigate the identified
impacts.
Slopes nnd Erosion
Potential Impact: Development of the site will require alteration of the existing land-
form and minimal' cut and fill operations. The proposed grading plan results in an
estimated 30,700 aibic yards of cut and 85,300 cubic yards of ~l.
Findings: Conditions of Approval, monitored mitigation measures, and features
incorporated into the proposed project design will reduce the impacts identified in the
Final EIR to an insignificant level.
Facts: The above Finding is made in that Mitigation Measures 1,2 and 4 within
Section B. Slopes and Erosion of the Mitigation Monitoring Program will mitigate the
identffied impact.
Potential Impact: Slope erosion on-site is a sig~ifle~nt concern regarding surficial
stability. All cut and fill slopes will be planted with erosion resistant vegetation and
other protectabe devices.
Finding: Conditions of Approval, monitored mitigation measures, and features
incorporated into the proposed project design will reduce the impact identified in the
Final EIR to an in~dgni~cant level.
Facts: The above Finding is made in that Mitigation Measure 8 withi. Section B.
Slopes and Erosion of the Mitigation Monitoring Program will mitigate the identified
Noise .
Potential Impact: Construction noise represents a short-term impact on ambient
noise levels.
Findin2s: Conditions of Approval, monitored mitigation measures, and features
incorporated into the proposed project design will reduce the impacts identified in the
Final EIR to an insignificant level.
Facts: The above Finding is made in that Mitigation Measure 1 within Section C.
Noise of the Mitigation Monitoring Program will mitigate the identified impacts.
Potential Imvact: Bus operations and associated noise levels, based upon an actual
start up/departure session, was measured at several off-site locations. At these
locations, bus noise levels complied with the Model Noise Ordinance in that 55 dBA
was not exceeded.
Findin2s: Conditions of Approval, monitored mitigation measures, and features
incorporated into the proposed project design wffi reduce the impacts identified in the
Final EIR to an insignificant level.
Facts: No additional mitigation measures required.
Potential Impact: Traffic noise impacts associated with the proposed project are less
than 0.2 dBA or less. Noise increases less than 1.0 dBA wffi not be discernable to
local residents. (Nbise increases greater than 3.0 dBA are considered significant.)
Findings: Conditions of Approval, monitored mitigation measures, and features
incorporated into the proposed project design wffi reduce the impacts identified in the
Final EIR to an insignificant level.
Facts: No additional mitigation measures required.
Climate and Air Qnalit~
Potential ImXmct: An e~timated 0.06 tons of particulate emissions per day will be
released as a result of dust generated by construction equipment and winds during the
grading phase and site preparation of the project.
Findin2E Conditions of Approval, monitored mitigation measures, and features
incorporated into the proposed project design will reduce the impact identified in the
Final EIR to an insignlfi~nt level.
Facts: The above Finding is made in that Mitigation Measures 1 through 19 within
Section D. Climate and Air Quality of the Mitigation Monitoring Program will
mitigate the identified impact. .
Potential Impact: The project wffi generate long-term impacts which include mobile
emissions resulting from the estimated 10,000 daily vehicle miles traveled as well as
stationary emissions resulting from the consumption of electricity and natural gas.
The long-term pollutant generation associated with the proposed project is not
considered "significant" by the SCAQMD.
Findings: Conditions of Approval, monitored mitigation measures, and features
incorporated into the proposed project design will reduce the impact identified in the
Final EIR to an insignificant level.
Facts: The above Finding is made in that Mitigation Measures 20 through 23 within
Section D. Climate and Air Quality of the .Mitigation Monitoring Program will
mitigate the identified impact.
Circulation
Potential Impact: The proposed project wffi generate an estimated 1,000 trips per
day. Of this total, 100 trips are morning peak hour trips and 110 trips are evening
peak hour trips. The proposed project is planned to take its primary access from
Margarita Road. This interim access will be dosed once the future Chaparral High
School is operational. The addition of project traffic does not alter the 'Level of
Service at any of the impacted intersections. The intersections of Winchester
Road/Nicolas Road and Winchester Road/Roripaugh Road are currently operating at
Level of Service "F" during the evening peak hour and existing volumes meet the
warrants for signalization. The level of traffic activity at the project site will be the
same as that at the existing site on Rancho Vista Road and therefore no net increase
in areawide traffic will occur. :
Findings: Conditions of Approval, monitored mitigation measures, and features
incorporated into the proposed project design will reduce the impact identified in the
Final EIR to an insignificant level.
Facts: The above Finding is made in that Mitigation Measures 1 through 3 within
Section E. Circulation of the Mitigation Monitoring Program will mitigate the
identified impact.
Hydrolo~,v
Potential Impact: The development and construction phase of the project wffi
potentially create short-term impacts related to erosion and sedimentation due to the
creation of exposed soils during project grading.
Findings: Conditions of Approval, monitored mitigation measures, and features
incorporated into the proposed project design will reduce the impacts identified in the
Final EIR to an in. significant level.
Facts: The above Finding is made in that Mitigation Measure 1 within Section F.
Hydrology of the Mitigation Monitoring Program will mitigate the identified impacts:
Potential Impact: The development phase of the project will create impermeable
surfaces (par.king lots, bus storage areas, roofs, etc.) thereby increasing on-site runoff.
Increased site runoff, as well as upstream surface flows, will be accommodated by the
proposed drainage system. The increased flow rates from the project wffi
incrementally contribute to cumulatively increased flow rates downstream primarily
to Murrieta Creek and the potential for flooding in downstream areas conts~ning
undersized facilities. On-site flood hazards associated with the adjacent Santa
Gertrudis Creek have been eliminated with recent channel improvements.
Findings: Conditions of Approval, monitored mitigation measures, and features
incorporated into the proposed project design will reduce the impacts identified in the
Final EIR to an insignificant level.
Facts: The above Finding is made in that Mitigation Measures 1 and 2 within Section
F. Hydrology of the Mitigation Monitoring Program wffi mitigate the identified'
impacts.
Water Quality
Potential Impact: Project development will alter the composition of surface runoff by
grading site surface~, construction of impervious streets, roofs and parking facilities,
and by irrigation of landscaped areas. Runoff entering the storm drain system will
contain minor amounts of pollutants typical of urban use, including pesticides,
fertilizers, oil and rubber residues, detergentS, hydrocarbon particles and other debris.
This runoff, typical of urban use, will contribute to the incrementally increased
degradation of water quality downstreRm.
Findin2s: Conditions of Approval, monitored mitigation measures, and features
incorporated into the proposed project design will reduce the impacts identified in the
Final EIR to an insignificant level.
Facts: The above Finding is made in that Mitigation Measures 1 through 3 wi~hln
Section O. Water Quality. _of the Mitigation Monitoring Program will mitigate the
identified imlSacts:
Risk of Upset
Potential Impact: Development of the proposed project will include provision of
maintenance fa~illties, repair shops, and a fuel and wash island, all of which are part
of the maintenance portion of the proposed project. In addition, the transportation
portion of the proposed project will include six bus repair areas. These functions may
involve the storage and use of hazardous materials. As such, the project has the
potential for the risk of explosion and/or the release of hazardous substances.
Findings: Conditions of Approval, monitored mitigation measures, and features
incorporated into the proposed project design will reduce the impact identified in the
Final EIR to an insignificant level.
Facts: The above Finding is made in that Mitigation Measure 1 within Section H.,
Risk of Upset of the Mitigation Monitoring Program will mitigate the identified
impact.
Cultural and Scientific Resources
Potential Impact: Possible adverse impact to the Pauba Formation which is of
"Moderate" to "High" paleontological sensitivity, may occur as a result of project
development. No archaeological sites have been observed with project boundaries,
however, potential impacts to Hnlcnown cultural resources may occur.
Findin2s: Conditions of Approval, monitored mitigation measures, and features
incorporated into the proposed project design will reduce the impact identified in the
Final EIR to an insignificant. level.
Factsi The above Finding is made in that Mitigation Measures 1 through 3 within
Section I. Cultural and Scientific Resources the Mitigation Monitoring Program will
mitigate the identified impact.
Wildllfe nnd Vegetation
Potential Impact: Construction activities will remove introduced grassland habitat
through cut and fill and other grading operations thereby resulting in the direct loss
of this habitat and less mobile wildlife formS. Impacts resulting from vegetation loss
affects the wildlife associated with that vegetation by either destroying it or displacing
it to adjacent habitat. Additional impacts to wildlife results from increasing
harassment from eats, dogs, children, light and glare, background noise and excessive
construction related noises. Conversion of the on-site introduced grassland community
to development wffi reduce areawide foraging habitat for raptors.
Findings: Conditions of Approval, monitored mitigation measures, and features
incorporated into the pro_posed project design will reduce the impacts identified in the
Final EIR to 'an insignifi_e~,~t level.
Facts: The above Finding is made in that Mitigation Measure 1 within Section J.
Wildlife and Vegetation of the Mitigation Monitoring Program wffi mitigate the
identffied impacts.
Toxic Substs, nces
Potential Imnact: There is no evidence that on-site soils pose any hazard to future
use of the subject property. Development of the proposed project will include the
provision of maintenance facilities, repair;shops and a fuel and wash island, all of
which are part of the maintenance portion of the proposed facility. In addition, the
transportation portion of the proposed facility wffi include six bus repair areas. These
functions may involve the storage and use of toxic substances.
Findings: Conditions of Approval, monitored mitigation measures, and features
incorporated into the proposed project design will reduce the impacts identified in the
Final EIR to an insignificant level.
Facts: The above Fincling is made in that Mitigation Measures 1 and 2 within Section
L. Toxic Substances of the Mitigation Monitoring Program will mitigate the identified
impacts.
Aesthetics/Li~,ht and Glare
Potential Impact: Project. development wffi permanently alter the nature and
appearance of the project site from its current open space use to the land uses
proposed. The currently degraded nature of the project site reduces these aesthetic
impacts to a level of insignificance. The project site is well set back from Winchester
Road (approximately' 430 feet to the east) well outside. the required 50 foot Scenic
Highway setback. The site itself does not contain nor will proposed development
block any scenic vistas which merit preservation. The project site lies within the 30
mile Special Lighting Area of the Mt. Palomar Observatory.
Findin2s: Conditions of Approval, monitored mitigation measures, and features
incorporated into the proposed project design will reduce the impacts identified in the
Final EIR to an insignificant level.
Facts: The above Finding is made in that M/tigation Measures 1 and 2 within Section
M. Aesthetics/Light and Glare of the Mitigation Monitoring Program will mitigate the
identffied impacts.
Natural and Energy Resources
Potential Impixct: On-sit~ n~xtural gas demand is estimated to be '48,798 cubic feet per
month. On-site electricity consumption is estimated to be 214,711 kilowatt hours per
year. The proposed project will result in the consumption of 667 gallons of gasoline
per day of which 384 gallons is estimated to be diesel fuel.
Findings: Conditions of Approval, monitored mitigation measures, and features
incorporated into the proposed project design will reduce the impacts identified in the
Final EIR to an insignificant level.
Facts: The above Finding is made in that Mitigation Measure 1 within Section N.
Energy and Natural Resources of the Mitigation Monitoring Program will mitigate the
identified impacts.
Water and Sewer Service
Potential Imnact: Project development will increase the demand on water and sewer
service in the area The total average day demand for the project is estimated at
233,911 gallons. The project will require on-site water lines connecting to existing
facilities in Winchester Road in order to provide water service to the site. The project
is anticipated to generate an average daily demand of 19,926 gallons per day of
wastewater. Sewer lines will be extended from existing lines in Winchester Road to
serve the site. EMWD will require the project to construct reclaimed water lines on-
site so that when the regional system, which is currently in the planning process, is
complete, the project can utilize reclaimed water for specific irrigation purposes.
Findings: Conditions of Approval, monitored mitigation measures, and features
incorporated into the proposed project design will reduce the impact identified in the
Final EIR to an insignificant level.
Facts: The above Finding is made in that Mitigation Measures 1 through 4 within
Section O. 1, Water and Sewer of the Mitigation Monitoring Program will mitigate the
identified impacts.
Fire Protection
Potential Impact: Project development will increase the demand upon existing fire
protection services. These impacts are due to the increase in emergency or public
service calls generated by project development
Findin2s: Conditions of Approval, monitored mitigation measures, and features
incorporated into the proposed project design will reduce the impacts identified in the
Final EIR to an insignfficant level.
Facts: The above Finding is made in that Mitigation Measure 1 within Section 0.2,
Fire Protection of the Mitigation Monitoring Program will mitigate the identffied
impacts.
Police Protection
Potential Impact: Thd addition of maintenance, operations and transportation
facilities will result in minimum additional demand for additional police protection
services generally related to occasional burglary or vanrinlism calls.
Findings: Conditions of Approval, monitored mitigation measures, and features
incorporated into the proposed project design will reduce the impacts identified in the
Final EIR to an insignil~,~t level.
Facts: The above Finding is made in that Mitigation Measure 1 within Section 0.3,
Police Protection of the Mitigation Monitoring Progrnm wffi mitigate the identffied
impacts.
Utilities
Potential Impact: Project development will place additional demand on existing
electrical supplies. The project is estimated to utilize 214,711 kilowatt hours (kwh) of
electricity per year. The demand for natural gas wffi also increase with project
development. The project is estimated to consume 48,798 cubic feet of natural gas per
month. The proposed project will place additional demand upon phone service. The
proposed project falls within the existing service capabilities of the involved utility
agencies.
Findings: Conditions of Approval, monitored' mitigation measures, and features
incorporated into the proposed project design wffi reduce the impacts identified in the
Final EIR to an insignificant level.
Facts: The above Finding is made in that Mitigation Measure 1 within Section 0.4,
Utilities of the Mitigation Monitoring Program will mitigate the identified impacts.
Solid Waste
Potential Impact: Project development will increase the amount of solid waste
generated on-site, which in turn wffi increase the demand upon waste haulers serving
the area. The proposed project is anticipated to generate 244 pounds of solid waste
per day.
Findings: Conditions of Approval, monitored mitigation measures, and features
incorporated into the proposed project design wffi reduce the impact identified in the
Final EIR to an insignfficant level. .'
Facts: The above Finding is made in that Mitigation Measures 1 and 2 within Section
0.5, Solid Waste of the Mitigation Monitoring Program will mitigate the identified
impact. :
SECTION
SIGNIFICANT UN~AVOIDABLE ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS WHICH
CANNOT BE MITIGATED TO A LEVEL OF INSIGNIFICANCE
The City has determined that certain environmental effects cannot be feasibly
or objectively mitigated to a level of insignificance although the Final EIR contains
mitigation measures and Conditions of Approval imposed on the proposed project will
provide a substantial mitigation of these effects. Consequently, in accordance with
Section 15093 of the State CEQA Guidelines, a Statement of Overriding
'Considerations has been prepared (See Section 1 of this Findings package) to
substantiate the City's decision to accept these unavoidable adverse environmental
effects because of the benefits afforded by the proposed project. The mitigation
measures referred to below are contained within the Mitigation Monitoring Program
which is attached as Appendix A to these Findings.
Seismic Safety
Potential Impact: Since the project site lies within the dam inundation area for
Skinner Reservoir Dam, it may be subject to seismically-induced flooding from dam
failure.
Findings: The impact identified in the Final EIR cannot be mitigated to a level of
insignificance in spite of the mitigation measure related to adherence to the "Report
on Flood Warning and Evacuation for the Proposed Chaparral High School Site in the
Event of Breach of the West Dsm of Domenigoni Reservoir" (see Responses to
Comments package within Final Environmental Impact Report). However, Conditions
of Approval, monitored mitigation measures, and features incorporated into the
proposed project will reduce, to the extent feasible, the adverse environmental effect.
Facts: The above Finding is made in that a .Statement of Overriding Considerations
has been prepared for the proposed project (See Section i of this Findings package).
Climate and Air Quality
Potential Imnact: Nitrogen oxides emissions during project construction will exceed
SCAQMD thresholds.
Findings: The impact identffied in the Final EIR cannot be mitigated to a level of
insignificance. However, Conditions of Approval, monitored mitigation measures, and
features incorporated into the proposed project will reduce, to the extent feasible, the
adverse environmental effect.
Facts: The above Finding is made in that a Statement of Overriding Considerations
has been prepared for the proposed project (See Section i of this Findings package)
and that Mitigation Measures 9 through 19 within Section D. Air Quality of the
Mitigation Monitoring Program will partially mitigate the identified impacts.
Hvdroloov
Potential I.mbact: Since' the project si~e lies within the rl~m inundation area for
Skinner Reservoir, it may be subject ~ seismically-induced flooding from dam failure.
Findin2s: The impact identified in the Final EIR cannot be mitigated to a level of
insignlfj_~nce. However, Conditions of Approval, monitored mitigation measures, and
features incorporated into the proposed project will reduce, to the extent feasible, the
adverse environmental effect.
Facts: The above Finding is made in that a Statement of Overriding Considerations
has been prepared for the proposed project (See Section 1 of this Findings package).
No additional mitigations are proposed for' this Signifi~nt impact.
Land Use
Potential Imnact: Project development will result in the transition in land use from
open space to the proposed project, as well as resulting in the permanent loss of
future agriculture productivity on "Prime Agricultural Land."
Findings: The impact identified in the Final EIR cannot be mitigated to a level of
insignificance.
Facts: The above Finding is made in that a Statement of Overriding Considerations
has been prepared for the proposed project (See Section 1 of this Findings package).
No additional mitigation measures are proposed for this significant impact.
SECTION 4
GROWTH-INDUCING IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT
Section 15126(g) of the State CEQA Guidelines requires considerations of the
ways that the proposed project could be considered growth-inducing.
As the proposed project is located in an area undergoing rapid urbanization and
is generally surrounded by future urban uses, signifi~rtt growth-inducing impacts are ..
difficult to foresee.
Several land development proposals have been prepared for vacant adjacent
properties, therefore, the proposed project fs not considered growth-inducing to these
surrounding areas. These surrounding project proposals include the Winchester Hills,
Temecula Regional Center and Campos Verdes Specific Plans. The proposed project
can be considered growth-accommodating, as it will provide improved services from
the Temecula Valley Uniteled School District from a centrally-located functionally-
combined facility. With the exception of minor utilities extensions, the necessary
infrastructure is in place to serve the project.
SECTION 5
FINDINGS REGARDING ALTERNATIVES
Alternatives to the proposed project described in the Final EIR were considered.
The alternatives discussed in the Final EIR constitute a reasonable range of potential
options necessary to permit a reasoned choice. The Final EIR identified the "No
Project" alternative as the environmentally superior alternative; however, the City did
not select any of the proposed project alternatives but approved the proposed project
with the mitigation measures from the Final EIR which will provide a substantial
-mitigation of the potential environmental effects. Consequently, in accordance with
Section 15093 of the State CEQA Guidelines, a Statement of Overriding
Considerations has been prepared (See .Section 1 of this Findings package) to
substantiate the City's decision to reject the environmentally preferred alternatives
because of the benefits afforded by the proposed project.
Alternative 1 - The ~No Project" Alternative
Description of Alternative: The Final EIR describes the "No Project" Alternative as
a continuation of existing undeveloped conditions supporting passive open space uses.
Comparison of Effects: The "No Project" Alternative would eliminate the
environmental impacts associated with the proposed project. These impacts include:
grading impacts and associated impacts upon landform, geology, hydrology, etc.; traffic
impacts and associated air quality and noise impacts; biological impacts related to
disruption of wildlife; and impacts related to provision of public services and utilities.
This Alternative also retains existing passive open space uses on-site, at least for the
short-term.
Finding: The "No Project" alternative is not feasible as this alternative fails to meet
project' the objectives identified in the Final EIR or to provide any of the benefits set
forth herein.
Facts: The above Finding is made in that it has been determined that this alternative
would negate the benefits associated with the primary project objective of assisting
and enhancing the maintenance, operations, and transportation functions of the
Temecula Valley Unified School District. Due .to the site's location within a
developing urban areas, the project site's City General Plan designation for urban
uses and the availability of public utilities serving the area, long-term undeveloped or
future agricultural use of the project site is not considered lil~ely nor logical.
Alternative 2 - Commercial Land Use
Description of Alternative: The Commercial Land Use Alternative considers
development of the site for commercial land uses pursuant to the City of Temecula,
General Plan (B-P, Business Park) and Zoning (R-R, Rural Residential) designations
for the project site. Future development within the Commercial Land Use Alternative
is assumed to involve approximately 100,000 square feet of interior space for
commercial use.
Comparison Of Effects: This Alternative would have seismic safety and slopes and
erosion impacts which are similar to those associated with the project proposal.
Impacts to hydrology and water quality are anticipated to be greater with this
Alternative as compared to the proposed project due to the increased number of
customers associated with commercial land uses. This Alternative would generate
5,314 daily vehicle trips, a 431% increase as compared to vehicular traffic levels
associated with the project proposal. Similar increased in noise and air quality
impacts are also anticipated with this Alternative. This Alternative would result in
the loss of passive open space uses and would preclude the future use of the site for
agricultural purposes. Similar wildlife/vegetation and cultural and scientffic resource
impacts are anticipated to occur with this Alternative as compared to the project
proposal. Increased fire and police protection demands as well as utilities and solid
waste demands are anticipated with this Alternative as compared to the proposed
project. Water and sewer demands of this Alternative are similar to those associated
with the proposed project.
Findings: After comparing the relative impacts and benefits of the proposed project
and the Commercial Land Use Alternative, the City did not select this Alternative.
However, Conditions of Approval, monitored mitigation measures, and features
incorporated into .the proposed project, as described in Sections 2 and 3 of this
Findings package, will substantially lessen the environmental impacts of the proposed
project.
Facts: The Commercial Land Use Alternative was rejected in favor of the proposed
project for the following reasons. This Alternative results in increased impacts in the
areas of hydrology, traffic, noise, air quality and certain public facilities and utilities
and is, therefore, not considered to be "environmentally superior" to the current
development proposal. Also, this Alternative would eliminate public benefits
associated with the project, including the assisting and enhancing the operations of
the Temecula Valley Unified School District.
Alternative 3 - Business Park Land Use Alternative
Descrintion of Alternative: The Business Park Land Use Alternative involves
development of business park uses on the project site. It is assumed that the site
would be developed with approximately 145,000 square feet of interior space for
business park land uses.
Comparison of Effects: Impacts of this Alternative associated with seismic safety,
slopes and erosion, hydrology and water quality, open space and conservation,
wildlife/vegetation, and cultural and scientific resources, would be similar to those
assodated with the proposed project. This Alternative would generate 18,850 daily
vehicle trips, a 1,755% increase as compared to vehicular traffic levels associated with
the project proposal. Similar increases in noise and air quality impacts are also
anticipated with this Alternative.
This Alternative would also increase the impacts associated with 'police and fire
protection, energy consumption and solid waste generation. Water and sewer
demands of this Alternative'are similar to those associated with the proposed project.
Findinws: After comparing the relative impacts and benefits of the proposed project
and the Business Park Land Use Alternative, the City did not select this Alternative.
However, Conditions of Approval, monitored mitigation measures, and features
incorporated into the proposed project, as described in Sections 2 and 3 of this
Findings package, will substantially lessen the environmental impacts of the proposed
project.
Facts: The Business Park Land Use Alternative was rejected in favor of the proposed
project for the following reasons. This Alternative results in signlfi~tly increased
impacts in the area of traffic, noise and air quality. This Alternative is not, therefore,
considered "environmentally superior". This Alternative also negates the public
benefits associated with the project including assisting and enhancing the operations
of the Temecula Valley Unified School District. This Alternative could also result in
land use conflicts with surrounding commercial and residential land uses.
Alternative 4- Alternative Sites
Descrintion of Alternative: The Temecula Valley Unlt~ied School District considered
in deta~ several alternative site locations in the process of selecting the currently-
proposed project location. These alternative project site locations include: 1) a parcel
at Margarita Road and Pauba Road; 2) the Rancho California Water District Building
on Diaz Road; and 3) a parcel at Rancho Vista Road across the street from the
existing School District Offices.
Findings: After comparing the relative impacts and benefits of the proposed project
and various Alternative Sites, the City did not select any of these Alternatives.
Project development at Margarita Road and Pauba Road would result in increased
impacts in the areas of surrounding land use compatibility, project grading, air
quality, aesthetics, and relocation of off-site utilities. This site is also less than the
ideal size for the proposed project facilities. Project development at the Rancho
California Water District Bu~ding on Diaz Road would result in longer routes and
potential delays for District busses due to this site's location on the west side of
Interstate 15. This alternate site is also subject to flooding from Murrieta Creek and
is also smaller than the ideal size for the proposed project facilities. Project
development at Rancho Vista Road across from the existing School District offices
would remove parking from the Temecula. High School stadium, create potential
surrounding land use incompatibilities, and result in potential aesthetic impacts and
would result in the placement of transportation and maintenance/operations functions
of the School District in different locations.
Facts: These Alternative sites were rejected in favor of the proposed project location
because project development at these Alternate sites would result in increased
environmental impacts as summarized above.
SECTION 6
FINDINGS REGtRDING MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code requires that when a public
agency is mnlcing the Findings required by State CEQA Guidelines Section 15091(a)
(1), codified as Section 21081(a) of the Public Resources Code, the public agency shall
adopt a reporting or monitoring progrnm for the changes to the proposed project
which it has adopted or made a Condition of Approval, in order to mitigate or avoid
significant effects on the environment.
The City of Temecula hereby fin& and accepts that the Mitigation Monitoring
Program, which is attached as Appendix.' A to this Findings package, meets the
requirements of Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code by providing for the
implementation and monitoring of project conditions intended to mitigate potential
environmental impacts.
SECTION
SECTION 15091 AND 15O92 FINDINGS
Based on the foregoing findings and the information contained in. the record,
the City of Temecula has made one or more of the following t~ndings with respect to
the significant effects of the proposed project:
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the
proposed project which mitigate or avoid many of the significant
environmental effects thereof as identffied in the Final EIR.
Some changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction
of another public agency and such changes have been adopted by such
other agency, or can and should be adopted by such other agency.
Specific economic, social, or other considerations make feasible the
mitigation measures or alternatives identified in the Final
Environmental Impact Report.
Based on the foregoing findings and the information contained in the record,
and as conditioned by the foregoing findings:
All significant effects on the environment due to the proposed project
have been eliminated or substantially lessened where feasible (see
Sections 2 and 3 of this Findings. package).
Any remaining significant effects on the environment found to be
unavoidable are acceptable due to the overriding concerns set forth in
the foregoing Statement of Overriding Considerations (see Section 1 of
this Findings package).
APPF_ANDIX A
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
SEE ATTACHM'F, NT NO. 6
ATTACHMENT NO. 6
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
R:\STAFFRPT'~I 57PA93.PC 4/28/94 ,,dl ~5
Z
z
6
6
Zr.z.1
.~8 .~8 ~8 ~8 .r8 .r8 ~8
6
6
OZ
Z
6 6
Z~
O,o
Z
Z
OZ
ATTACHMENT NO. 7
PUBLIC COMMENTS
R:\STAFFRPT~157PA93.PC 4/28/94 sdl 36
County of Riverside .tc ,vto
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTIt
TO: CITY OF TEMECUL'A PLANNING DEPT. ~,~
Afro: SaiedN eh
FROM:
JOHN SIL VA, P.E., Senior Public Health Engineer, Department of Environmental Hcatth
RE: MECULA VALLEY UNIFORM SCHOOL DISTRICT TRANSPORTATION,
ADMINISTRATIVE AND MAINTENANCE FACILITY - DRAFT EIR
WATER/SEWER: (John C. Silva, P.E., Senior Public Health En2ineerL Deparhaaent of Environmental
Health
The 6.642 acre site will be receiving its 23,911 gallons per day of domestic water from Rancho California Water
District. A total of 19,926 gallons per day of sewage is estimated from the project which will be treated at the
Eastern Municipal Water District plant in Temecula.
Use of RECLAIMED WATER is mentioned but not fully explored for project implementation. Should a dual
plumbing system be used to irrigate the landscape and shrubbery, enough fresh water would be saved and made
available to serve about 50 homes or families. In the reclaimed business, a project such as this is the ideal type of
project for dual uses of water. The dual system would be designed by a Registered Civil Engineer with
review/approval by the Riverside County Health Department.
SOLID WASTE: Chuck Strev, P.E., Civil En2ineer, Department of Environmental Health
The LEA offers the following comments on the above referenced project:
1. The EIR should address the proper handling, and recycling of construction waste generated during the
project development.
2. Multi-family dwelling unit waste bin enclosures should provide adequate space for storage of recyclable
materials.
3. If any significant illegal land filling activity is discovered as a result of this project, the LEA shall be
notified prior to burial or removal.
If you should have any further questions regarding the above Document, please do not hesitate to contact me at
(909) 275-8980.
JS:dr
State of California (' Business, Transportation and Housing Agency
Memorandum
To
From
:State Clearinghouse "-
Office of Planning & Research
1400 10th Street
Sacramento, CA 95814
Attention Mari Lewis
: DEPARTMENTOFTRANSPORTATION
District 8
Da~ : April 1, 1994
FileNo.: 08-Riv-79-R3.9
SCH# 93092023
Sublet: Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Temecula Valley School
District Bus and Maintenance Facility
We have reviewed the above-referenced document and request
consideration of the following comments:
Care should be taken when developing this project to
preserve and perpetuate the existing drainage pattern
of the state highway. Particular consideration must be
given to cumulative increased storm runoff to insure
that a highway drainage.problem is not created.
Access from the project to State Route 79 (Winchester
Road), opposite Roripaugh Road, will require Caltrans
approval. All matters regarding access, grading, and
drainage should be sent to:
Mr. Gerry Lunt
Development Review
California Department of Transportation
P.O. Box 231
San Berna~dino, CA '92402
If you have any questions, please contact La Keda Johnson at
(909) 383-5929 or FAX (909) 383-7934.
Riverside County
Coordination Branch
LKJ:cl
REPLY TO
ATTENTION OF:
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
LOS ANGELES DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 2711
LOS ANGELES. CALIFORNIA I~053-2325
February 28, 1994
RECEIVED*
Office of the Chief
Regulatory Branch
RECEIVED
i. ? u ? 199
City of Temecula
Planning Department
Attn: Saied Naaseh
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
Gentlemen:
It has come to our attention that you plan to construct a
transportation and maintenance facility adjacent to Santa
Gertrudis Creek, west of Winchester Road and north of Margarita
Road in the City of Temecula, Riverside County, California. This
activity may require a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers permit. A
Corps of Engineers permit is required for:
a. Structures or work in or affecting "navigable waters of
the United States," including adjacent wetlands, pursuant to
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. Examples
include, but are not limited to, the following:
1) constructing a pier, revetment, bulkhead, jetty, aid to
navigation, artificial reef or island, and any structures to
be placed under or over a navigable water;
2) dredging, dredge disposal, filling and excavation.
b. The discharge of dredged or fill material into, including
any redeposit of dredged material within, "waters of the United
States" and adjacent wetlands pursuant to Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act of 1972. Examples include, but are not limited
to, the followlng:
1) creating fills for residential or commercial development,
placing bank protection, temporary or permanent stockpiling
of excavated material, building road crossings, backfilling
for utility line crossings and constructing outfall
structures, dams, levees, groins, weirs, or other structures;
2) mechanized landclearing, grading which involves filling
low areas or land leveling, ditching, channelizing.and other
excavation activities that would have the effect of
destroying or degrading waters of the United States;
3) -allowing runoff or overflow from a contained land or
water disposal area to re-enter a water of the United States;
4) placing pilings when such placement has or would have the
effect of a discharge of fill material.
c. The transportation of dredged or fill material by vessel
or other vehicle for the purpose of dumping the material into
ocean waters pursuant to Section 103 of the Marine Protection,
Research and Sanctuaries Act of 1972;
d. Any combination of the above.
Enclosed you will find an information packet that describes
our regulatory program. If you have any questions, please
contact Eric Stein of my staff at (213) 894-0352. Refer to this
letter in your reply.
Sincerely,
Bruce A. Henderson
Acting Chief, South Coast Section
Enclosures
RECEIVED
APR 0 8
South Coast
AIR _O, tJAL TY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT
21865 F. Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, C;A 91765-4182 (909) :396-:~000
March 8, 1994
Saled Naaseh
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
Dear Mr. Naaseh:
RE: Temecula Valley School District and Maintenance Facility
SCAQMD# RVC940225-01
RECEIVED
NAR t 0 199~
Due to staffing cutbacks the SCAQMD is unable to comment on your project at this time.
SCAQMD staff recommends that you follow the procedures and methodologies set out in
the SCAQMD CEQA Air Quality Handbook (April 1993). Utilizing the information in the
Handbook will assist you in adequately addressing the potential air quality impacts of your
project. The Handbook will be updated periodically, in an effort to assist your staff in
evaluating air quality impacts that may result from land use projects.
The District staff will, however, make every effort to evaluatedHirojects of a regional nature.
We are available to answer any questions you may have regar ng the use of the CEQA
Handbook. Please feel free to contact the Local Government o CEQA section at (909)
396-3.109 for assistance.
Program '
Planning ~uPF~c~logy Advancement
CAD:Ii
April 9, 1994
RECEIVr D
APR 111994
Dear .C~ty plan~e~,
I live in the Winchester Properties just east of the proposed
site, and I'm writing to you in regards to case #PA93-0157 and
PA94-0002.
I feel that a school district transportation facility,
could be a disaster to our area.
It was my understsnding that.a planners' obligation to the
community was to project balance and harmony throughout the
city. Ifeel this area is being neglected because we represent
a minority of tax paying citizens which reside with-in
the boundries of Temecula.
Part of the taxes I pay each year are to develop parks
and recreational areas which in hopes will create a pleasent
environment. As it is we have to travel miles to enjoy the
areas we helped finance.
Ifeel the proposed transportation site will further damage,
and create an unfair imbalance in comparison, of the surrounding
residences. I also feel the site should be placed in an area
where there is an abundance of greenery and existing parks
or on the eastern portion of Temecula where a negative
environmental impact is not as severe.
I respectfully urge the planning commision to find an
alternative site due to poor "climate and air quality" and
an undisireable" land use ".
concerned citizen of Temecula,
Jeffrey Glen Sechler
ATTACHMENT NO. 8
RESPONSE TO PUBLIC COMMENTS
R:\STAFFRPT~157PA93.PC 4/2S/94 edl 37
TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, MAINTENANCE,
OPERATIONS AND TRANSPORTATION FACILITY
PLANNING APPLICATION 94-0002
STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NO. 94022501
FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
RESPONSES TO PUBLIC COMMENTS
Lead Agency:
CITY OF TEMECULA
43174 Business Park Dr.
Temecula, CA 92590
Contact Planner: Saied.Naaseh
(714) 694-6400
Prepared by:
DOUGLAS WOOD & ASSOCIATES
567 San Nicolas Drive, Suite 106
Newport Beach~ CA 92660
(714) 644-7977
AGENCY COMMENTS/STAFF RESPONSES
The following agencies commented on the Draft EIR. Each comment received is contained
herein and is followed by a summary of the respective concern and the staff response. The
following Responses to Comments in combination with the Draft EIR, Staff Report and
any other attachments for this project constitute the Final EIR for the Temecula Valley
Unified School District, Maintenance, Operations and Transportation Facility.
Page
Executive Summary ................................................. 1
City of Temecuh Planning Depafiment (Aprfi 11, 1994) ................. 3
South Coast Air Quality Management
District (March 8, 1994) ........................................ 4
C. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (February 28, 1994) .................... 5
County of Riverside, Department of Environmental
Health (March 9, 1994) ......................................... 6
E,
Riverside County, Flood Control and Water
Conservation District (April 5, 1994) ............................... 8
State of California, Department of
Transportation (April 1, 1994) ................................... l0
G. Doreen Linnen (April 6, 1994) .................................. 11
~CUTIVE SUMMARY
The' Temecula Valley' Unified School District, Maintenance, Operations and
Transportation Facility, Draf~ Environmental Impact Report, was circulated for public
review by the City of Temecula between February 22, 1994 and April 8, 1994. This
circulation was in conformance with Section 15086, et.seq. of the State CEQA
Guidelines which state that, "The lead agency (City of Temecula) shall consult with
and request comments on the Draf~ EIE from: 1) Respensible agencies; 2) Trustee
agencies with resources affected by the project; and 3) Other State, Federal and local
agencies which exercise authority over resources which may be affected by the project.
The lead agency may consuit directly with any person who has special expertise with
respect to any environmental impact involved."
This 45-day public review period (per Section 15087(c) of the State CEQA
Guidelines) resulted in the receipt of comments from a variety of governmental
agencies and other responsible parties as listed below. As indicated in Section 15088
of the State CEQA Guidelines:
15088.
Evaluation of and Response to Comments
(a) The lead agency shall evaluate comments on
environmental issues received from persons who reviewed
the draft EIR and shall prepare a written response. The
lead agency shall respond to comments received during the
noticed comment period and any extensions and may
respond to late comments.
(b) The written response shall describe the disposition
of significant environmental issues raised (e.g., revisions to
the proposed project to mitigate anticipated impacts or
objections). In particular, the major environmental issues
raised when the lead agency's position is at variance with
recommendations and objections raised in the comments'
must be addressed in detail giving reasons why specific
comments and suggestions were not accepted. There must
be good faith, reasoned analysis in response. Conclusory
statements unsupported by factual information will not
staYice.'
(c) The response to comments may take the form of a
revision to the draft EIR or may be a separate section in
the final EIR. Where the response to comments makes
important changes in the information contained in the text
of the draft EIR, the lead agency should either:
(1) Revise the text in the body of the EIR,
or
1
(2) Include marginal notes showing that
the information is revised in the response to
commentS.
Provided below is a listing of each agency or responsible party who responded
to the Draft Environmental Impact Report accompanied by a listing of the respective
concerns raised and followed by an indication of the nature of the response to that
concern. Specific details concerning the comments made and responses provided can
be found in the following Response to Public Comments package. A copy of the actual
correspondence received is also included.
A~ncv/Resnonsible Party Concern Nature of Resnonse
City of Temecula Planning Request for additional Additional mitigation measure
Department mitigation concerning added to Section IV.F.,
Evacuation Plan for flooding. Hydrology.
South Coast Air Quality
Management District
Recommendation that CEQA
Handbook procedures be
followed.
SCAQMD CEQA Handbook
factors used in Section IV.D.
Climate and Air Quality.
C. U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers
A permit from the Corps of
Engineers may be required.
Reference made to mitigation 1
in Section IV.J., Wildlife/
Vegetation,
D,
County of Riverside,
Department of
Environmental Health
Riverside County, Flood
Control and Water
Conservation District
State of California
Department of
Transportation
G. Doreen Linnen
Additional information
concerning use of reclaimed
water and solid waste impacts
requested.
Project will not impact Master
Plan facilities. NPDES,
FEMA, DFG, and U.S. ACOE
permits required.
Project should not impact
drainage on a State Highway.
Approval of intersection design
required.
Opposed project due to air
quality, noise . and traffic
impacts. The project should be
relocated on the opposite side
of Interstate 15.
Additional reclaimed water and
solid waste information
provided.
Reference to applicable
mitigations provided.
Project will not drain toward
State Route 79 and will have
intersection plans checked by
Caltrans.
No long-term significant
project impacts related to air
quality, noise and circulation.
Alternate sites discussion in
Draft EIR quoted.
2
A. CITY OF TEMECULA, PLANNING DEPARTMENT (April 11, 1994)
PursuS.~t to the r'eqU~st of the City of Temecula, Plsnning Department, the
following mitigation measure is hereby added to Section IV.F., Hydrology, of the text
(page IV-65) of the Draft EIR with a aimilar addition made to the EIR
Summary/Mitigation Monitoring Program:
"3. The proposed project shall adhere to the recommendations of the "Report
on Flood Warning and Evacuation for the Proposed Chaparral High School Site ·
in the Event of Breach of West Dam'of Domenigoini Reservoir".
As noted on page IV-64 of the Draft EIR, this study is included in its entirely
within Appendix C of the Draft EIR and outlines a plan of communication, warning
and evacuation for the proposed Chaparral High School site which is immediately
adjacent to the project site. This Report, prepared in September of 1992, provides an
Evacuation Plan which addresses the following elements: warning time, staffing
requirements, communications systems, alerting procedures, evacuation
considerations and a recommended evacuation plan. The recommendations contained
in this Report would appear to be applicable to the proposed Maintenance, Operations
and Transportation Facility in the event of breaching of either Domenigoini or
Skinner Reservoir Dams.
SOUTH COAST AIR QU~kLrrY MANAG~ DISTRICT (March 8,
1994)
Comment 1: The South Coast Air Quality Management District recommends
that procedures and methodologies set forth in the SCAQMD CEQA Handbook
(April, 1993) is utilized within the analysis of air quality impacts within the
Draft EIR.
Response: Emission factors used to analyze air quality impacts in the Draft
EIR were based upon factors taken from the 1993 SCAQMD CEQA Air Quality
Handbook.
4
C. U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGIl~ERS (February 28, 1994)
~ommeht: A per~it"from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers will be required
for the proposed project for: a) structures or work in or affecting "navigable
waters of the United States" including adjacent wetlands pursuant to Sections
10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act; b) the discharge of dredged or fill material
including any redeposit of dredged material within "waters of the United
States" and adjacent wetlands pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
of 1972; c) the transportation of dredged or fill material for the purpose of
dumping the material into ocean waters pursuant to Section 103 of the Marine
Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act of 1972; or (d) any combination of the
above.
Response: As noted in Mitigation Measure 1 on page IV-75 of the Draft EIR:
"1. In concert with construction activities adjacent to Santa Gertrudis Creek,
the California Department of Fish and Game will be notified and consulted
pursuant to the California Fish and Game Cede Sections 1601-1603 and the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in conjunction with their Section 404 permit
process."
5
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRO~NTAL
m~AI,TH (March 9, 1994)
Comment 1: Use ~freclaimed water for the proposed project should be more
fully explore& Should a dual plumbing system be used to irrigate the
landscape and shrubbery, enough fresh water would be saved and made
available to serve about 50 homes or families. This project is the ideal type of
project for dual uses of water. The dual system would be designed by a reliable
civil engineer with review/approval by the Riverside County Health
Department.
Response: As stated on pages IV-92 and IV-93 of the Draft EIR:
"At the present time, there are no reclaimed water facilities to serve the
proposed project. Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD) is currently in the
process of plnnning a backbone reclaimed water system throughout the District
which may include a major line in Winchester Road. EMWD Ordinance No. 68,
adopted in October of 1989, describes the District's policy regarding reclaimed
water use. E~ may require the project to construct reclaimed water lines
on-site so that when the regional system is complete, the project can ultimately
utilize reclaimed water for irrigation."
"Areas most likely to utilize redaimed water are landscaped areas along the
perimeter of the proposed project as well as landscaped areas within parking
lots and adjacent to buildings. The proposed EMWD reclaimed water system
would ultimately provide service to the project site. The proposed project will
comply with EMWD's requirements for installation of on-site reclaimed water
lines. The project will likely connect to the backbone reclaimed water line to
be constructed in the future along Winchester road. A distribution line may be
extended as part of the extension of Roripaugh Road."
Mitigation Measure 1 on page IV-93 of the Draft EIR has been revised to state
(addition underlined):
"1. All water, sewer and reclaimed water facilities will be designed per the
Eastern Municipal Water Distr (EMWD) and the Rancho California Water
District's (RCWD) requirements. Reclaimed water facilities will also be
reviewed by the County of Riverside, Denartment of Environmental Health.
The infrastructural system will be installed to the requirements of EMWD and
RCWD. The property owner will also grant any requested easements to
RCWD."
Comment 2: The Final EIR should address the proper handling, and recycling
of construction waste generated during the project development.
Response: The construction phase of the proposed project will produce solid
waste. Construction waste is calculated at approximately 16 pounds per square foot
of building space and generally consist of lumber, roofing material, concrete debris,
etc. Assurelug 24,399 square feet of total interior space associated with the proposed
project, the solid waste associated with the overall construction phase of the proposed
project is estimated at 390,384 pounds of 195.2 tons. This is considered a short-term,
non-signfficant impact.
On page IV-100 of the Draft EIR, Mitigation Measure i states that the project
applicant is required to "work with the County Waste Management Department and
the City of Temecula in efforts to achieve the goals of the Integrated Waste
Management Act." This requirement also applies to the generation of construction
waste.
Comment 3: Multi-family dwelling unit waste bin enclosures should provide
adequate space for storage for recydable materials.
Response: No multi-family residential land uses are proposed. Solid waste bin
enclosure areas within the proposed project, the precise design of which will be
reviewed and approved by the City of Temecula, Community Services Department,
will include adequate space for storage of recyclable materials.
Comment 4: If any significant ~egal land filling activity is discovered as a
result of this project, the DEH shall be notified prior to burial or removal.
Response:
As noted in Mitigation Measures 1 and 2 on page IV-82 of the
Draft EIR:
"1. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the City of Temecula and any
appropriate County or state agencies shall review proposed project plans to
determine the potential for existence and use of toxic materials and potential
adverse effects from exposure to toxic substances. Particular impacts which
may occur include degradation to air and water quality, health problems,
transportation, storage or disposal problems. Required measures may include
requirements for setbacks, siting of structures and monitoring."
"2. The proposed facility, once operating, will adhere to standards and
requirements of OSHA, Cal OSHA, EPA, the County of Riverside, Department
of Environmental Health and the City of Temecula."
7
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER
CONSERVATION DISTRICT (April 5, 1994)
Comment 1: This project would not be impacted by Drainage Master Plan
facilities or other facilities of regional interest.
Response: This comment is hereby incorporated into the Final Environmental
Impact Report.
Comment 2: This project my require a National PoHutant Discharge
EliminAtion System (NPDES) permit 'from the State Water Resources Control
Boar& Clearance for grading, recordation, or other final approval, should not
be given until the City has determined that the project has been granted a
permit or is shown to be exempt.
Response: As noted in Mitigation Measures 1 and 2 on page IV-67 of the Draft
EIR:
"1. Pursuant to requirements of the California State Regional Water
Resources Control Board, a state-wide general National Pollution Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) construction permit will apply to all project-
related construction activities. Construction activity includes: clearing,
grading, or excavation that results in the disturbance of at least five acres of
total land area, or activity which is part of a larger common plan of
development of five acres or greater. Therefore, as a mitigation for this project,
the appropriate NPDES construction permit shall be obtained prior to
commencing grading activities. All development within the project boundaries
shall be subject to future requirements adopted by the City to implement to
NPDES program."
"2. The proposed project wffi comply with National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) requirements through the provision of three-
stage treatment clarifiers for. surface runoff from the project site. Eastern
Municipal Water District will monitor the quality of runoff from these
stiff aces."
Comment 3: If this project involves a Federal Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA) mapped floodplain, then the City should require the applicant to
provide all studies, calculations, plans and other information required to meet
FEMA requirements, and should further require that the applicant obtain a
Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) prior to grading, recordation or
other final approval of the project, anal a Letter of Map Revision (IX)MR) prior
to occupancy.
Response: As noted in Mitigation Measure 1 on page V-64 of the Draft EIR:
"All drainage facilities for this project shall conform to the standards and
requirements of the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation
District and the City of Temecula in order to mitigate potential surface
8
This measure would apply to the FEMA requirements noted above, as applicable to
the proposed project. ' ....
Comment 4: If a natural watercourse or mapped floodplain is impacted by this
project, the City should require the applicant to obtain a Section 1601-1603
Agreement from the California Department of Fish and GAme and a Clean
Water Act Section 404 permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers or
written correspondence from these agencies indicating the project is exempt
from these requirements. A Clean Water Act Section 404 Water Quality
Certification may be required from the local California Regional Water Quality
Control Board prior to issuance of the Corps 404 permits.
Response: See response to comments from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
as contained in this Responses to Comments package.
STATE OF CALIFORNIk DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
(April 1, 1994)
Comment 1: Care should be taken when developing this project to preserve
and perpetuate the existing drainage pattern of the State Hig*hway. Particular
consideration must be given to cumulative increased storm runoff to insure
that a highway drainage problem is not created.
Response: The size of the project site (6.642 acres) and the direction of future
drainage flows from the finished project (toward Santa Gertrudis Creek and away
from State Route 79) insures that the proposed project wffi not result in increased
· storm runoff impacts to the nearest State Highway, Winchester Road (State Route
79).
Comment 2: Access from the project to State Route 79 (Winchester Road),
opposite Reripaugh Read, will require Caltrans approval.
Response: This comment is hereby incorporated into the Final Environmental
Impact Report.
10
G. DOREEN LINNEN (April 6, 1994)
Comment 1: I object to the placement of a bus facility near our home for the
following reasons= a) air pollution b) noise, and c) traffic congestion. These
impacts wffi result in a loss of property value of our home.
Response: The impacts of the proposed project related to air quality, noise and
traffic were analyzed in detail in Sections IV.D., Air Quality, IV.C., Noise and IV.E.
Circulation. The only significant impact resulting from the analysis of these three
issues is the "short-term" (construction -related) emissions of Nitrogen Oxides. This
impact is short-term in that it only occurs during and as a result of project
construction.
Comment 2: This type of project should be placed on the opposite side of the
freeway away from housing.
Response: Section V.C., Alternatives to the Proposed Project, within the Draft
EIR, analyzes alternate project sites. One alternate site which was considered was
located on the west side of Interstate 15 (Rancho California Water District Building
on Diaz Read). This alternative was rejected due to the site's location on the west
side of Interstate 15 which lengthens bus routes and would result in possible delays
in bus service due to traffic congestion at the freeway overpasses.
11
South Coast
AIR QUAL TY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT
21865 E. Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, C;A 91765-4182 (909) 396-:>000
B
March 8, 1994
Sated Naaseh
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
Dear Mr. Naaseh:
RE: Temecula Valley School District and Maintenance Facility
SCAQMD# RVC940225-01
RECEIVED
HAR I O ISS'4
Due to staffing cutbacks the SCAQMD is unable to comment on your project at this time.
SCAQMD staff recommends that you follow the procedures and methodologies set out in
the SCAQMD CEQA Air Quality Handbook (April 1993). Utilizing the information in the
Handbook will assist you in adequately addressing the potential air quality impacts of your
project. The Handbook will be updated periodically, in an effort to assist your staff in
evaluating air quality impacts that may result from land use projects.
The District staff will, however, make every effort to evaluate projects of a regional nature.
We are available to answer any questions you may have regarding the use of the CEQA
Handbook. Please feel free to contact the Local Government - CEQA section at (909)
396-3 109 for assistance.
CAD:Ii
_ .-_
REPLY TO
ATTENTION OF;
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
LOS ANGELES DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O- BOX 2711
LOS ANGELES. CALIFORNIA ~0ll53-2325
February 28, 1994
C
RECEIVe9':
Office of the Chief
Regulatory Branch
RF, CEIVF, D
City of Temecula
Planning Department
Attn: Saied Naaseh
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
Ans'd ....____
Gentlemen:
It has come to our attention that you plan to construct a
transportation and maintenance facility adjacent to Santa
Gertrudis Creek, west of Winchester Road and north of Margarita
Road in the City of Temecula, Riverside County, California. This
activity may require a U.S. Army Corps. of Engineers permit. A
Corps of Engineers permit is required for:
a. Structures or work in or affecting "navigable waters of
the United States," including adjacent wetlands, pursuant to
section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. Examples
include, but are not limited to, the following:
1) constructing a pier, revetment, bulkhead, jetty, aid to
navigation, artificial reef or island, and any structures to
be placed under or over a navigable water;
2) dredging,' dredge disposal, filling and excavation.
b. The discharge of dredged or fill material into, including
any redeposit of dredged material within, "waters of the United
States" and adjacent wetlands pursuant to Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act of 1972. Examples include, but are not limited
to, the following:
1) creating fills for residential or commercial development,
placing bank protection, temporary or permanent stockpiling
of excavated material, building road crossings, backfilling
for utility line crossings and constructing outfall
structures, dams, levees, groins, weirs, or other structures;
2) mechanized landclearing, grading which involves filling
low areas or land leveling, ditching, channelizing and other
excavation activities that would have the effect of
destroying or degrading waters of the United States;
3) a}towing runoff or overflow from a contained land or
water disposal area to re-enter a water of the United States;
4) placing pilings when such placement has or would have the
effect of a discharge of fill material.
c. The transportation of dredged or fill material by vessel
or other vehicle for the purpose of dumping the material into
ocean waters pursuant to Section 103 of the Marine Protection,
Research and Sanctuaries Act of 1972;
d. Any combination of the above.
Enclosed you will find an information packet that describes
our regulatory program. If you have any questions, please
contact Eric Stein of my staff at (213) 894-0352. Refer to this
letter in your reply.
Sincerely,
Bruce A. Henderson
Acting Chief, South Coast Section
Enclosures
County of Riverside
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
DATE:
TO: -C~Y OF TEMEC-U-L-A- PLANNING DEPT.
Avr : S edN ,eh
%C.~ JOHN SILVA, P.E., Senior PubIic Health Engineer, Depamnent of Environmental Health
FR~.-OM: ~TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFORM SCHOOL DISTRICT TRANSPORTATION,
ADMINISTRATIVE AND MAINTENANCE FACILITY - DRAFT EIR
WA TER/SEWER: (John C. Silva, P.E., Senior Public Health Engineer), Denartment of Environmental
Health
The 6.642. acre site will be receiving its 23,911 gallons per day of domestic water from Rancho California Water
District. A total of 19,926 gallons per day of sewage is estimated from the project which will be treated at the
Eastern Municipal Water District plant in Temeeula.
Use of RECLAIMED WATER is mentioned but not fully explored for project implementation. Should a dual
plumbing system be used to iragate the landscape and shrubbery, enough fresh water would be saved and made
available to serve about 50 homes or families. In the reclaimed business, a project such as this is the ideal type of
project for dual uses of water. The dual system would be designed by a Registered Civil Engineer with
review/approval by the Riverside County Health Department.
SOLID WASTE: Chuck Strev, P.E., Civil En2ineer, Denartment of Environmental Health
The LEA ofters the following comments on the above referenced project:
1. The EIR should address the proper handling, and recycling of construction waste generated during the
project development.
2. Multi-family dwelling umt waste bin enclosures should provide adequate space for storage of reeyclable
materials.
3. If any significant illegal land filling activity is discovered as a result of this project, the LEA shall be
notified prior to burial or removal.
If you should have any further questions regarding the above Document, please do not hesitate to contact me at
(909) 275-8980.
1
2
3
4
JS:dr
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND
WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
P.O. ~ !033 E
The District does not normally recommend conditions for land divisions or other land use cases In inooqxxazed oltles, The District. also __does nol
plan Check dry land use cases, or provide Stale Division of Red Estate beers or other Ikxxl hezard reports for such Case&
comment¢/reoonlmerdations for such cases are normeJly limi*.ed to items of spedtic Interest to L*-.e ~ including ~trlar, Master Drainage Pies'
fadlitJes, other regional flood control and drainage facilities which todd be conddered a logical conlxx~nt or extendon of 8 master plan system,
and Dis. trict Area Drainage Plan fees (development mitigation fees). In addition, informalion of a general nature is provided.
The Dietrid has not reviewed the proposed project in detail and the fallowing checked comments do not in any way constitute or imply Dislrk;t
approval or endorsement of the proposed project with raspe~ to flood hazard, public health and solely or any other such issue:
Is project would not be Impacted by District Master Drainage Ran fadlilies nor are other fadEties of regional interest proposed. 1
["] This project involves District Master Ran facilities. The District will aCCept ownership of such radiities on written request of the City. Facilities
must be mnstructed 1o CHstrlct standards, and District plan check and inspection will be requked for District acceptance. Plan checi~
inspection and administrative fees will be required.
r"'] Thi$ ptojed im-oposes channels, storm drains 36 inches or la~ef In diemeier, or other radiities theK co{JId be considered regional in n
and/or a Jogic~ extonsjon of tho m~3pted _ Ma~ter Drainago Plen. The District would consider 8cceptlng
ownership of such fadlities on ~wltton request of the City. Fadlilies must be conSLrUC;ted tO Distri(;( $tafidards, and Distdd plan check and
inspeclion will be required for District acceptance. Plan Check, InspeCtion and administrative fees will be required.
f"'] TNs proJed is located within the Emits of the Distrlct's Area Drajnage Ran tot which drainage
fees havo been adopted; applicable foos sl~ould be paid to tho Rood Contrd District or City prio~ to final approval of the project, or in the c, ase
of ~ parcel map or subdivision prior to recordatlon of the final map. Fees to be paid should be at the rate in effect at the time of recordorion,
or if deferred, at Ihe time of issuance ot the actu~ permit.
GENFRAI INFOBM,5.T. LQN
This projed may require a National Pdlutant Discharge Elimlnalion System (NPDES) perrnil from the State Water Resources Control B~ard. 2
Clearance for grading, recordorion, or other final approval, should not be given until the City has determined thet the project hes been grained a
permit or is shown to be exempt.
If this project involves ~ Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) mapped flood plain, then the City should require ~he 8ppllCant to -
provide all studies, C.~lculalions, plans end other Intofruition required to meet FEMA requirements, and should furlher require that the applicant
obtain a Conditional L~Tler of Map Revision (CLOMR) prior tO grading, recordorion or other final approval ol the project. and a Letter ol Map
Revision (LOMR) prior to occupancy.
If a nalural wateroourso or mapped floud plain is hnpacled by this project the'Clly should require the applicant to obtain a ,Seclion 1601/1603
Agreement from the California Departmenl of Fish and Game and a Clean Water ACt Section 404 potrail from the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers, or writlen correspondence Irom Ihese agerides Indicating the projecl Is exempt from these requlrernenl$. A Clean Water Act Se~ion
404 Water Quality C, ertilication may be required from the local California Regional Waler Quality Conb'ol Boai'd prior to issuance of the Corps
404 permit.
c:
Very truly yours,
_~",1:),(. DUSTY WILLIAMS · ~
Senior Civil Engineer , :~-~
~PR 18 ' 94 n"~. ,"
-- norandu;m
and HeullngP~i/~nq'
I
,State Clearinghouse
Office of Planning & Research
1400 1Oth ~treet
Sacramento, CA 95814
Attention Mari Lewis
: DEPARTMENTOFTRANSPORfATION
D'ietrict 8
Dme ' April 1, 1994
Fib Ne., O8-R~v-Tg-R3 · 9
MCH# 93092023
Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Temeoula Valley School
District Bus and Maintenance Facility
we have reviewed ~he above-referen~od document and request
consideration of the following comments|
care should be taken when developing this project to
preserve and perpetuate the existing drainage pattern
of the Brats highway. Particular consideration must be
given to cumulative increased storm runoff to insure
that a highway drainage.problem is not created.
I
Access from the project to State Route 79 (Winchester
Road), opposite Roripaugh Road, Will require Celtfans
approve]- All matters regarding access, grading, and
drainage should be sent
Mr. Gerry bunt
Development Review
California Department of Transportation
P.O, BOX 231
8an Bernardino, CA 92402
If you have any questions, please contact La Keda Johnson at
(909) 383-5929 or FAX (909) 383-7934.
Riverside County
Coordination Branch
LKJ:cl
2
kTE OF CALFORNIA
:)VERNOR'S OFFICE OF PLANNING AND RESEARCH
X) TENTH STREET ' .~.-
CRAMENTO, OA gSB14
April 12, 2994
PETE WILSON,
RECEIVED
APR 161994
CITY OF 'IT, MECULA
The State Cleazinehouse has submit~ed the shove na~md draft Invizonment&l lmpaa~
Report (fIR) to selected trite agencies for review. The review peri~i is now ~loled
and the aomments from the =lspondin9 igency(lel) is(are} enclosed. O~ the enclosed'
Notice oJ Completion form you will no~e tha~ ~he Clearinghouse has sheeked the
agencies that have eommen~ed. Please review the No&See $f Completion t~ e~suEe ~h&~
your co~ent pacXlge ~s c~mplete. If the c~wen~ paGklge is n~ in order, please
notify the's~a~e Clearinghouse immediately. Remember ~0 refe~ ~o the
eleh%-d~git Sties Clearinghouse number so ~hit we ms~ respond prompelt.
Please note &hit Sectia~ 21104 o~ the Calieozn~a Public Resources C~de required
thaws
"a responsible agency or other public agency shall only mak~ pub.t~ntive
comments rags''~' 'N'.,~e ectivi~4~ tzsvr,~,u~d in a project which
an area of expertise of the agsnoy or which ere required to be oarrAid ou~
or approved bF t~e agency."
Commenting agencies are also required by th~s section %~ support their cemmente
e~eoif~c documentation.
TheSe OommentS are forwarded for your use An ~reparing your fiail IIR. Should ~ou
need more ~n~o~mation or clarification, we recommend that you co~tic~ the
zgen~(lec).
This lette~ ackngwledgee.~he~ you hive complied with the It&re dilatinghouse review
requirements Jot draf~ environmental documents, pursuant ~o the Cellfornil
Environmen~al 9eelill &of. Piesel contact Marl Lemoe s~ (916) 445-0613 If ~ou have
any queeti;nl regarding the environmental review process.
[nclosures
~r~; ReSOUrcal Agency
RECEIVED
APR 0 8 199~
Ans'd .........._
ATTACHMENT NO. 5
SCHOOL DISTRICT LETTER - COMMUNITY MEETING
R:\STAR;RPT~I57PA93.CC 6/7/94 klb
13
October 19, 1993
TEMECULA VALLEY
"Un'ifled School District
SUPERINTENDENT
Patdcia B. Novotney, Ed.D.
RECEIVED
OCT 2 1 1993
Ans 'd ............
BOARD OF EDUCATION
Rosie Vanderhaak
Joan F. Sparkman
Clerk
Dr. David Eurich
Walt Swictda
Member
Barbara Tooker
Saied Naaseh
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California 92590
SUBJECT:
Dear Saied:'
OCTOBER 13 COMMUNITY MEETING SUMMARY
MAiNTEN/~NCE, OPERATIONS, & TRANSPORTATION FACILITY
As discussed with you, our community meeting last week was very successful in informing the Roripaugh Hills and
Winchester Collection area residents of the subject project and addressing the concerns of these neighbors related
to the project.
As you know, we hand delivered approximately 900 invitations to the neighbors on October 8, and 12 neighbors
responded by attending the October 13 evening meeting. (See attached attendee list.) In general, the comments
from the 12 neighbors were positive toward the site and building design, and the following questions were raised:
1. What would be the working hours of this facility? Generally 6:00 AM - 5:00 PM
2. Would there be stadium lights at the adjacent high school site? No, per i~igh school EIR.
3. Is there a need for a Margarita entrance stop lite? Being addressed in EIR traffic study, Doug Wood to follow up.
4. Is the 40 bus design capacity sufficient to support the complete build-out of the District? Yes.
E. Do the traffic studies address the recently completed Margarita extension? Doug Wood to follow up.
6. What is being incorporated in the design to reduce graffiti potential? Vines on bare walls.
7. What is the process for final approval of this project by the City ? January Planning Commission and City Council
hearings and EIR certification.
8. Would a footbridge across Santa Gertrudis Creek be feasible to serve the new High School? footbridge across
Highway 79? May be des/~able but very costly and difficult to secure funding.
9. What will ultimately be the speed limit on Highway 79? Caltrans data needed.
10. Could property north of the high school site be set aside for a city park? City Planning Depertment
determination.
11. Will the emissions from the buses be an impact to surrounding neighbors? No. SCAQMD testing data forwarded
to interested neighbors and included in EIR.
Also attached are our comments to Doug Wood on the Screencheck Draft EIR for this project. We have asked Doug
to do everything possible to work with you to be ready for the January 3 Planning Commission meeting, and the
January City Council 'meeting.
Thank you for combining the Planning' Commission/City Council hearing notices, and for your continuing efforts to
keep this EIR on schedule.
Si cerely, ~
e er
Director of Facilities Development
cc:
Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning,. City of Temecula
Patricia B. Novotney, Ed.D., Superintendent
John Brooks, Assistant Superintendent Business Services
Doug Wood, Douglas Wood and Associates
Tom Burke, BGRP
(SAIED.OCT} 31350 Rancho Vista Road / Temecuta, CA 92592 / (909) 676-2661
-TEMECULA-VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
MAINTENANCE/TRANSPORTATION FACILITY
INFORMATIONAL MEETING
OCTOBER 13, 1993, 7:30 pm
MARGARITA MIDDLE SCHOOL
ATTENDEES LIST.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
NAME
Elise Turner
Nick & Irene Vultaggio
John & Annette Roberrs
Lee Dietz
Bob & Eileen Merrill
Robert Wyatt
Coleen Moorhouse
Ed & Marilyn Mowles
ADDRESS
39859 Creative Drive
39813 Creative Drive
27440 Bolandra Court
14507 Staring Street
39730 Barberry Court
39100 Rising Hill Drive
39534 Long Ridge Drive
27595 Dandelion Court
DAYTIMEPHONE#
909-677-3225
909-677-2423
909-676-2528
909-699-1503
909-694-8419
639-1120
734-1111
909-677-5763
909-694-9649
ATTACHMENT NO. 6
FEE CHECKLIST
R:\STAFFRFI'XI57PA93.CC ~fil94 klb 14
ATTACHMENT NO. 6
......... CITY OF TEMECULA
DEVELOPMENT FEE CHECKLIST
Planning Application No. PA93-O157
The following fees were reviewed by Staff relative to their applicability to this project (refer
to the May 2, 1994 Planning Commission Staff Report.
Fee
Habitat Conservation Plan
(K-Rat)
Parks and Recreation
(Quimby)
Public Facility
(Traffic Mitigation)
Public Facility
(Traffic Signal Mitigation)
Public Facility
(Library)
Fire Protection
Flood Control
(ADP)
Consistent with Specific Plan
Consistent with Future General Plan
Condition of ADDrOval
Condition No. 12
Condition No. N/A
Condition No. N/A
Condition No. N/A
Condition No. N/A
Condition No. 89
Condition No. 52
N/A
YES
R:\STAFFRPT~157PA93.CC 6fil94 kib 15
ITEM N O. 2 3
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: (~_ City Manager/City Council ·
FROM: Shawn D Nelson
· , Director of Community Services
DATE: June 14, 1994
SUBJECT: Lease Agreement with the Temecula Valley Historical Museum Foundation
PREPARED BY:~'~,r~Phyllis L. Ruse, Senior Management Analyst
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council:
1. Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 94-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVING THE LEASE OF PROPERTY WITHIN SAM HICKS MONUMENT
PARK FOR THE TEMECULA MUSEUM
e
e
Accept the Summary Report Pursuant to Section 33433 of the California Community
Redevelopment Law on an amended and restated Lease by and between the City of
Temecula and the Old Town Temecula Historical Museum Foundation.
Approve the amended and restated Museum Lease Agreement by and between the
City of Temecul~ and the Old Town Temecula Historical Museum Foundation.
Appropriate $500,000 to Capital Projects Account No. 210-190-808-5804 and
approve an operating transfer from Development Impact Fund of $500,000 to fund the
renovation of St. Catherine's Church and the construction ofthe Tememcula Valley
Historical MUseum at Sam Hicks Monument Park.
BACKGROUND: On October 2, 1990, the City Council approved a lease with the Old
Town Temecula Historical Museum Foundation for forty (40) years for $1.00 per year. The
purpose of this lease was to allow the Museum F~undation to construct a museum facility and
renovate the old church on Sam Hicks Monument Park. On November 9, 1993, the Council
approved an amendment to the lease, allowing the Foundation additional time to complete
their construction. However, because the Museum Foundation will be utilizing City funds' to
construct the museum facility, a new amendment to the existing lease agreement has been
prepared for City Council consideration.
Redevelopment Law requires that the City Council accept a Summary Report and adopt a
r,%c~,agendas%tv~deaee.ec
060294
Resolution based on that report acknowledging that the property is to be leased for lower than
market value. The Report and Resolution further affirm that leasing the property to the
Museum Foundation is in the'best interest of the City, will benefit the citizens of Temecula,
and will assist in the elimination of blight conditions in the City.
The lease provides for the Museum Foundation to renovate St. Catherine's Church and
construct a museum facility of no more than 22,900 square feet. The museum will be
constructed in phases with Phase I including a 6,100 square foot museum building, a 1,800
square foot plaza area, and a 1,200 square foot interpretative area. The lease is for a forty .
(40) year term with an additional twenty (20) year option at the same lease amount.
The recently approved Master Plan for Sam Hicks Monument Park calls for additional
improvements to the park which the City will construct. These improvements include .a
restroom/snack bar, bandstand, picnic facilities, pedestrian circulation, parking, and
landscaping. The City will maintain all park amenities and landscaping. Operation and
maintenance of the museum and church buildings will be the responsibility of the Museum
Foundation.
FISCAL IMPACT: Cost of improving the church facility and constructing the
museum is budgeted at $500,000 in Development Impact Fees. Cost of completing the park
improvements at Sam Hicks Monument Park is budgeted at $475,000 in Redevelopment
Agency funds.
Attachments:
Resolution
Summary Report
Lease Agreement
r.~ssgssdss~tvfdssse,c~ 060294
SUMMARY REPORT PURSUANT TO
.... SECTION 33433
OF THE
CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT LAW
ON AN
AMENDED AND RESTA~ LEASE
BY AND BETWEEN
TIlE CITY OF TEMECULA
THE OLD TOWN TEMECULA HISTORICAL MUSEUM FOUNDATION
This summary report has been prepared by the Temecula Redevelopment Agency
("Agency") pursuant to Section 33433 of the California Health and Safety Code. This report
sets forth certain details in the proposed amended and restated lease agreement ("Lease")
between the City of Temecula (City) and the Old Town Temecula Historical Museum
Foundation ("Foundation").
The Lease requires the City to lease property located adjacent to Sam Hicks Park to
the Foundation for the purpose of constructing a museum. The property to be leased
includes a parcel that was purchased in part from tax increment monies,
As required by the Community Redevelopment Law, this report describes and
· specifies:
1. The cost of the proposed lease to the Agency;
The estimated value of the interests proposed to be leased determined at the
highest-uses permitted under the Redevelopmerit Plan;
e
The purchase price and sum of the lease payments to be paid by the
Foundation for the interests being leased; and
e
The means by which the lease of the propen7 at less than fair market value
will assist in the removal of blight.
This report and the proposed lease are to be made available for public inspection prior
to the approval of the Lease.
This report and the proposed lease are to be made available for public inspection prior
to the approval of the Lease.
SUMMARY OF THE LEASE
A. The City acquired title to certain real pwperty located in the City of
Temecula, County of Riverside, Stab of California, known as Sam Hicks Monument Park
(the "Park"), on or about April, 1991 from the Sam Hicks Monument Park Foundation.
B. Upon acquisition by the City, the Park was subject to a Museum Lease
between the City and the Temecula Historical Museum Foundation, dated January 1, 1991,
which contemphted the construction of a 3,000 square foot Museum and also the relocation
of a 1,200 square foot Church within the Park..
C. On July 15, 1992, the City acquired title to certain real property adjoining the
Park, known as the 'L-Shaped Parcel.* This Parcel was added to the Park. The purchase
price for the L-Shaped Parcel was $1,050,000, of which the Temecula Redevelopment
Agency paid $400,800 from tax increment monies.
D. The Foundation has revised its plans for the Museum, and now desires to
construct a 22,900 square foot building, in phases. The first phase will consist of a 6,100
square foot Museum, an 1,800 square foot plaza and a 1,000 square foot outdoor interpretlye
center, along with renovation of the church. The Museum will be built on the L-Shaped
Parcel, but the church will be located on the original park land.
E. The Museum is to be open to the public. It will house the Temecula Museum
Collection, consisting of art objects, artifacts, papers, photographs, architectural elements
and other items of aesthetic, cultural or historical significance relating to the Temecula
region. The foundation shall operate the Museum for the preservation, interpretation and
exhibition of the Temecula Museum Collection and for educating the public regarding the
Temecula region.
F. The Museum is to be located within Sub Area 3 of the Temecula
Re, development Project Area, adjacent to the Old Town Temecula portion of the Project
Area. Redevelopmerit of the economic base of Old Town Temecuh requires attracting
tourists not only from within Riverside County and adjacent Counties, but also from beyond
Southern California.. It further requires making Old Town Temecula. into the cultural heart
of the surrounding Temecula Valley. Locating, constructing and operating the Temecula
Museum adjacent to Old Town is critical to achieving these objectives. By creating a
cultural center to the Temecuia Valley, the Museum will attract tourists, stimulate economic
growth, and benefit the Project Area. :
G. The following blighting conditions are present within old Town:
1. Old buildings that do not meet current se~smi~ sl~ndards;
"2. Lack'of'Adequate on-street and off-street parking;
Subdivided lots of inadequate size for proper usefulness and
development that are in multiple ownership;
4. Stagnant and depreciating property values; and
e
Incompatible land uses that serve to prevent economic development in
the area.
H. The Foundation lacks sufficient resources to construct the Museum entirely
with its own funds. Consequently, City and Redevelopment Agency assistance is required.
I. Leasing land purchased with tax increment monies to the Museum at below
fair market value, and providing City resources to fund construction of the Museum will
stimulate economic growth, and thereby help eliminate the above blighting conditions.
J. Pursuant to Health and Safety Code 33433, the City has made available to the
public a copy of the Lease with the Foundation for construction and operation of the
Museum. The following information describes the Redevelopment Agency's participation in
the purchase of the property to be leased:
1. The cost of the "L-Shaped Parcel" to the Agency was $400,800.
appraised value of this Parcel as of July 1991 was $900,000 according to the City's
appraisal, and $1,245,000 according to the then-owner's February 1992 appraisal. The
actual price was $1,050,000 or ($15.75 per square foot), of which the Agency funded
$400,800.
The
2. The Redevelopment Plan permitted the Museum footprint, as well as
the L-Shaped Parcel to be developed as Scenic-Highway Commercial. Consequently, the
highest and best use for the Museum footprint under the Plan is approximately the original
purchase price of $15.75 per square foot, or $360,675 for the 22,900 square foot footprint.
However, since the July 15, 1992 purchase of the L-Shaped Parcel, prices have declined. As
an example, an appraisal completed for the City on an adjacent comparable property on
August 13, 1993 reflects a fair market value of only $10.36 per square foot. Consequently,
the current market value of the footprint is estimated to be $237,244.
3. Also, since the purchase of. the L-Shaped Parcel, the City Adopted its
General Plan in November, 1993, and the Old Town Specific Plan in February, 1994. These
documents restrict the highest and best use of the Museum footprint primarily to cultural and
civic uses. This restriction substantially reduces the estimated value of the Museum footprint
to be leased to the foundation.
P:SUMk!ARY.LS
4. The total recital value of Museum footprint over the 40 year lease and
the 20 year opti_'on period ~ $_60, which is substantially less than the fair market value of the
footprint."
K. Leasing the Museum footprint to the Foundation at le&s than the fair marl~t
value of the sit~ will assist in the elimination of the above-referenced blighting conditions
because the exisUmce of the Museum win further estabnsh Old Town Temecula as the
cultural heart of the Temecula Vaney. The Museum win assist in attracting tourists from
beyond the City, thereby stimulating economic activity in the Old Town Temecula area by
providing a customer base for restaurant, retail and entertainment uses.
RESOLUTION NO, 94-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECUIA APPROVING TFIY~ LI~.AKSE OF
PROPERTY WITHeN SAM HICKS MONUMENT PARK
FOR THY~ TEMECULA MUSEUM
The City Council of the. City of Temecula does. hereby determine, resolve, and order
as follows:
Section 1. Findings. The City Council hereby makes the following findings:
A. The City acquired title to certain real property located in the City of
Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, known as Sam Hicks Monument Park
(the "Park"), on or about April, 1991 from the Sam Hicks Monument Park Foundation.
B. Upon acquisition by the City, the Park was subject to a Museum Lease
between the City and the Temecula Historical Museum Foundation, dated January 1, 1991,
which contemplated the constructidn of a 3,000 square foot Museum and also the relocation
of a 1,200 square foot church within the Park.
C. On July 15, 1992, the City acquired title to certain real property adjoining the
Park, known as the "L-Shaped Parcel." This Parcel was added to the Park. The purchase
price for the L-Shaped Parcel was $1,050,000, of which the Temecula Redevelopmerit
Agency paid $400,800 from tax increment monies.
D. The Foundation has revised its plans for the Museum, and now desires to
construct a 22,900 square foot building, in phases. The first phase will consist of a 6,100
square foot Museum, an 1,800 square foot plats and a 1,000 square foot outdoor interprefive
center, along with renovation of the church. The Museum will be built on the L-Shaped
Parcel, but the church will be located on the original park land.
E. The Museum is to be open to the public. It will house the Temecula MUseum
Collection, consisting of an objects, artifacts papers, photographs, architectural elements and
other items of aesthetic, cultural or historical significance relating to the Tomecult region.
The Foundation shall 'operate the Museum for the preservation, interpretation and exhibition
of the Temecuia Musetim Collection and for educating the public regarding the Temecula
region.
F. The Museum is to be located withi~ Sub Area 3 of the Temecula
Redevelopment Project Area, adjacent to the Old Town Temecula portion of the Project
Area. Redevelopmerit of the economic base of Old Town Temecula requires attracting
tourists not only from within Riverside County and adjacent Counties, but also from beyond
Southern California.' It further requires making Old Town Temecula into the cultural heart
of the surrounding Temecula Valley. Locating, conslnxcling and operating the Temecula
Museum adjacent-to Old Town is critical to achieving these objectives. By creating a
cultural center to the Temecula Valley, the Museum will attract tourists, stimulate economic
growth, and benefit the Project Area. "
G. The following blighting conditions are p~t within Old Town:
1. Old buildings that do not meet current seismic standards;
2. Lack of adequate on-street and off-street parking;
3. Subdivided lots of inadequate size for proper usefulness and
development that are in multiple ownership;
4. Stagnant and depreciating property values; and
5. Incompatible adjacent uses that serve to prevent economic development
1t. The Foundation lacks sufficient resources to construct the Museum entirely
with its own funds. Consequently, City and Redevelopmerit Agency assistance is required.
I. Leasing land purchased with tax increment monies to the Museum at below
fair market value, and providing City resources to fund construction of the Museum will
stimulate economic growth, and thereby help eliminate the above blighting conditions.
J. Pursuant to Health and Safety Code 33433, the City has made available to the
public a copy of the Lease with the Foundation for construction and opexation of the
Museum. The City has also made available to the public a summary providing the following
information concerning the DDA:
1. The cost of the 'L-Shaped Parcel' to the Agency was $400,800. The
appraised value of this Parcel as of July 1991 was $900,000 according to the City's
appraisal, and $1,245,000 according to the then-owner's February 1992 appraisal. The
actual purchase price was $1,050,000 or ($15.75 per square foot), of which the Agency
funded $400,800.
2. The Redevelopment Plan permitted the Museum footprint, as well as
the L-Shaped Parcel to be developed as Scenic-Highway Comma Consequently, the
highest and best use for the Museum footprint uniter the Plan is approximately the original
purchase price of $15.75 per square feet, or $360,675 for the 22,900 square foot footlxint.
However, since the July 15, 1992 purchase of the L-Shaped Parcel, prices have declined.
As an sample, an appraisal completed for the City on an adjacent comparable property on
August 13, 1993 reflects a fair market value of only $10.36 per square foot. Consequently,
the current market value of the footprint is estimated to be $237,244.
3. Also, since the purchase of the L-Shaped Parcel, the City adopted its
General Plan in November 1993, and the Old Town Specific Plan in February, 1994. These
documents restrict the highest and best use of the Museum footprint primaffiy to cultural and
civic uses. This restriction substantially reduces the estimated value of the Museum footprint
to be leased to the Foundation.
4. The total rental value of Museum footprint over the 40 year lease and
the 20 year option period is $60, which is substantially less than the fair market value of the
footprint.
K. Leasing the Museum footprint to the Foundation at less than the fair market
value of the site will assist in the elimination of the above-referenced blighting conditions
because the existence of the Museum will further establish Old Town Temecula as the
cultural heart of the Temecula Valley. The Museum will assist in attracting tourists from
beyond the City, thereby stimulating economic activity in the Old Town Temecuh area by
providing a customer base for restaurant, retail and entertainment uses.
Section 2. Based upon the above findings, the City Council of the City of
Temecula hereby approves the leasing of the Museum footprint to the Old Town Temecula
Museum Foundation for the purposes of construction of the Old Town Temecula Museum.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOFI~.D, this 141h day of June, 1994.
Ronsld H. RoberU, Mayor
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
STATE OF CATIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE)ss
CITY OF TEMECULA)
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Resolution No. 9~__ was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 14th day of June 1994, by the following
vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
COUNCrr.MF~MBERS:
COUNC'K,lV~-MBERS:
COUNCK,MEMBERS
COUNC~ERS:
EXEMPT RECORDING REQUESTED BY
City of Temecula
PER GOV'-T-CODE S 6103'
AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
Attention: City Clerk
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE
AMENDED AND RESTATED MUSEUM LEASE
AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF
TEMECULAAND THE OLD TOWN TEMECULA
HISTORICAL MUSEUM FOUNDATION
JUNE 14, 1994
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
RECITALS
AGREEMENT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
eeeeeeeeeee'eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
PARTIES TO THE AGREEMENT ............
A. The City ........................
B. The Foundation ........ ~ ........
LEASE OF PROPERTY ......... , .........
EXHIBITS ............................
PROHIBITION AGAINST CHANGE IN
OWNERSHIP, MANAGEMENT AND
CONTROL OF FOUNDATION ...............
TERM .................................
RENT ................................
USE OF THE PROPERTY .................
SCOPE OF DEVELOPMENT .................
FUNDING ..............................
DESIGN OF PHASE i MUSEUM .............
SELECTION OF THE PHASE 1
MUSEUM CONTRACTOR ....................
CONSTRUCTION OF PHASE i MUSEUM .......
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF THE
PHASE 2 MUSEUM AND THE CHURCH ........
OPERATION. OF THE MUSEUM ..............
STRUCTURES AND FIXTURES ..............
SURRENDER OF PROPERTY ...... ~ .........
REPAIRS ..............................
ALTERATIONS ..........................
-i-
Paae
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
4
4
5
6
6
6
7
8
9
9
9
10
20.
21,
22.
23,
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
UTILITIES ............................
MECHANICS ' LIENS' . ....................
ALIENABILITY OF PROPERTY .............
TAXES ................................
WASTE OR NUISANCE ....................
INDEMNITY AND INSURANCE ..............
NON-LIABILITY OF OFFICIALS AND
EMPLOYEES OF THE CITY .................
INSOLVENCY ...........................
ABANDONMENT ..........................
INSPECTION OF BOOKS AND RECORDS ......
ENTRY BY CITY ........................
COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS .................
NOND I S CRI MI NAT I ON ....................
DAMAGE/DESTRUCTION ...................
LEGAL ACTIONS ........................
RIGHTS AND REMEDIES ARE CUMULATIVE ...
INACTION NOT A WAIVER OF DEFAULT .....
DEFAULT, NOTICE OF DEFAULT, BREACH ...
DAMAGES ..............................
SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE .................
UNLAWFUL DETAINER ....................
TERMINATION . .........................
BINDING ON SUCCESSORS .................
NOTICES AND PAYMENTS .................
11
11
11
11
12
12
13
13
13
14
14
14
14
14
15
15
15
15
16
16
16
16
17
17
-ii-
This Amended and Restated Museum Lease Agreement
is entered'into as'~f'June 14, 1994, between the CITY OF
TEMECULA (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and THE OLD
TOWN TEMECULAHISTORICALMUSEUM FOUNDATION, a California
non-profit public benefit corporation (hereinafter referred
to as "FOUNDATION").
RECITALS
WHEREAS, the City acquired title to certain real
property located in the City of Temecula, County of
Riverside, State of California, known as Sam Hicks Monument
Park, which is described in Exhibit A-1 attached hereto, by
deed dated April 1991 (hereinafter referred to as "Parcel
WHEREAS, upon acquisition by the City, Parcel 1
was subject to a Museum Lease between the City and the
Foundation dated January 1, 1991, which contemplated the
construction of a 3,000 square foot Museum and the
relocation of a 1,200 square foot Church.
WHEREAS, subsequently, the City acquired title to
certain adjoining real property located in the City of
Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California which is
described in Exhibit A-2 attached hereto, by deed dated July
15, 1992 (hereinafter referred to as Parcel 2").
Collectively, Parcels I and 2 will be hereinafter referred
to as the "Park".
WHEREAS, the City and the Foundation desire to
terminate the January 1, 1991 Museum Lease in favor of this
Amended and Restated Museum Lease and Disposition and
Development Agreement (hereinafter referred to as the
"Agreement").
WHEREAS, the purpose of the Agreement is to
relocate and construct allarger Museum on Parcel 2 and
provide for the funding, operation and maintenance of such a
Museum.
WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Plan was approved by
Ordinance No. 658 of the Board of Supervisors of Riverside
County on July 12, 1988 prior to incorporation of the City
of Temecula. Pursuant to City Ordinance No. 91-11, which
became effective May 9, 1991, and.City Ordinance No. 91-15,
which became effective April 9,. 1991, the City approved the
Plan. Said Ordinances had the effect of adopting the Plan
and transferring jurisdiction over said Plan to the Agency,
as of July 1, 1991. Pursuant to Ordinance No. 93-04 and 94-
1071219~.2 '1-
Nay 27,
03, Ordinance No. 91-11 was codified at Section 8.04.010 of
the Temecula Municipal Code.
WHEREAS, Parcel 2 was purchased for $1,050,000, of
which the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula
funded $400,800. The Museum will be located on Parcel 2.
Because all of the Property to be used for the Museum and
Church will be leased to the Foundation at $1.00 per year,
which is less than fair market value, it is necessary that
the City approve the .Lease of the Property at less than fair
market value pursuant to Health & Safety Code Section 33433.
· Pursuant to City Resolution No. , the City Council has
approved the Lease of the Property at less than fair market
value.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of covenants and
promises hereinafter mentioned, the City, and Foundation
agree as follows:
AGREEMENT
1. PARTIES TO THE AGREEMENT
A. The City
The City is a general law city located in Riverside
County, California. All references to approvals by the City
shall mean the City Council of the City, unless another City
Commission or Officer is specifically designated.
B. The Foundation
The Foundation is a California non-profit, public
benefit corporation duly organized and existing under the
laws of the State of California. The principal office and
mailing address of the Foundation .is: Old Town Temecula
Historical Museum Foundation, P.O. Box 792, Temecula, CA
92593.
2. LEASE OF PROPERTY. The City hereby leases to the
Foundation the property located within the Park to be
occupied by the Museum and Church as per the attached plot
plan, attached as Exhibit "B", and hereinafter referred to
as the "Property."
3. EXHIBITS. The followinq Exhibits to this
Agreement are incorporated hereinky this reference:
Exhibits A-1 and A-2
Exhibit B
Park Deeds
Plot Plan of Leased Property
107121~.2
Hay 27, 1~4
-2-
Exhibit C
Exhibit D
Exhibit E
Basic Concept Drawings of
Phase i Museum and
Construction Budget
Schedule of Performance
Scope of Development
PROHIBITION AGAINST CHANGE IN OWNERSHIP, MANAGE-
MENT AND CONTROL OF FOUNDATION
The qualifications and identity of the Foundation
is of particular concern to the City and the Agency. It is
because of its qualifications and identity that the City and
Agency have entered into this Agreement with the Foundation.
Therefore, no voluntary or invol.untary successor in interest
of the Foundation shall acquire any rights or powers under
this Agreement except as expressly set forth herein.
The Foundation shall not assign all or any of its
rights or duties under this Agreement nor sublease the
Property without the prior written approval of the City,
which consent the City shall not unreasonably withhold
provided the City determines that the successor is similarly
qualified and has specifically agreed in writing to be bound
by the provisions of this Agreement.
All of the terms, covenants and conditions of this
Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the
benefit of the Foundation and the permitted successors and
assigns of the Foundation. Whenever the term "Foundation"
is used herein, such term shall include any other lawful
successors in interest of the Foundation.
5. TERM. The term of this Agreement shall be forty
(40) years, commencing on November 1, 1990, and ending on
October 31, 2030.
As part of the consideration for the execution of
this Agreement, the City hereby grants to the Foundation an
option to extend and renew the provisions of this Agreement
for a twenty-year term, upon the same terms and conditions
hereof. The option to renew and extend this Agreement must
be exercised, if at all, by notice in writing given to the
City not less than sixty (60) days prior to the expiration
on the previous' term.
6. RENT. The Foundation a~rees to pay the City as
rent for the use and occupancy of.the Property the sum of
ONE DOLLAR ($1.00) per year, payable in advance on the first
day of January of each year commencing with January 1, 1991,
and continuing thereafter during the Foundation's use and
occupancy of the Property.
10712194.2 '3 --
Nay 27, 1~94
Rent shall be payable in lawful money of the
United States to the City at the address stated herein or to
such other'persons"~'at such other places as the City may
designate in writing.
If the Foundation renews the term of this
Agreement as provided in Paragraph five (5), the Agreement
shall continue for the same rental rate.
7. USE OF THE PROPERTY.
A. The design and location of all structures
shall be subject to City approval, which approval shall not
be unreasonably withheld. All other construction projects,
not specifically permitted by this Agreement are prohibited.
B. The Foundation shall construct a Museum and
remodel the Church on the Property in phases. The first
phase shall include the following elements:
a)
Constructing a museum building of a minimum
size of 6,100 square feet;
b) Constructing a 1,800 square feet Plaza;
c)
Constructing an outdoor interpretative area of
1,200 square feet; and
d) Renovating the Church.
Basic Concept Drawings of these four elements are
depicted in Exhibit C, attached hereto, and will hereinafter
be referred to as the "Phase i Museum." By approving this
Agreement, the City has approved the design and location of
the Phase 1 Museum, as required by subparagraph A, above.
Construction of the Phase I Museum shall commence
no later than January 1, 1995. A final inspection or
certificate of occupancy of the Phase i Museum shall be
obtained on or before January.i, 1996.
The Foundation may increase the size of 'the Museum
to a maximum of 22,900 square feet in future construction
phases.
8. SCOPE OF DEVELOPMENT
A. The Property sha11;be developed within the
general controls established in the Scope of Development,
the approvals of the City as described herein, and the
further approvals of the City as required by the Temecula
107121~z~.2 '4-
Hay 27, lW~
Municipal Code, and related laws governing municipal
planning, zoning and subdivision.
B. The Phase i Museum shall be developed as
established in the Basic Concept Drawings and related
documents attached as Exhibit C, except as changes may be
mutually agreed upon between the Foundation and City. Any
such changes shall be within the general controls of the
Scope of Development.
C. If the FoundatiOn exercises its option to
increase the size of the Museum, then it first shall obtain
City approval of Basic Concept Drawings and related
documents for the development of.the each subsequent phase
of the Museum.
During the preparation of Basic Concept Drawings
for each subsequent phase of the Museum, the City and the
Foundation shall hold regular progress meetings to
coordinate the preparation of, submission to, and review of
the Drawings. The City and the Foundation and its approved
assignees shall communicate and consult informally as
frequently as is necessary to insure that the formal
submittal of any documents to the City can receive prompt
and speedy consideration.
D. No construction of any subsequent phase of
the Museum may occur without City approval of the Basic
Concept Drawings. Any City disapproval of the Basic Concept
Drawings shall state in writing the reasons for disapproval.
Upon receipt of such a disapproval, the Foundation shall
revise the portions of the Drawings which are disapproved
and related documents and resubmit then to the City as soon
as possible after receipt of the notice of disapproval.
E. The Foundation shall prepare and submit
construction drawings, specifications and related documents
for the Phase 1 Museum and all subsequent phases to the City
for review pursuant to the Temecula Municipal Code,
including the Building Code.
9. FUNDING. The City hereby agrees to finance the
construction of the Phase i Museum in an amount not to
exceed Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($500,000.00). The
Foundation shall be responsible for obtaining all other
necessary funds required to complete the Scope of
Development. Upon submission by the Foundation of a payment
request form, the City will pay to the Foundation funds
sufficient to pay the individuals or entities identified in
the payment request form the amounts specified for
architectural, engineering, and construction costs, not to
1071219~.2 -5-
May 27, 1994
exceed a total cumulative amount of $500,000. The
Foundation is to secure all appropriate labor and material
releases prior to ~ubmitting the payment request form.
10. DESIGN OF PHASE i MUSEUM. The Foundation shall
employ a properly qualified registered architect (the
"Architect") and other necessary professionals, including
civil engineers to design and prepare detailed bid
documents, construction plans and specifications for the
Phase I Museum identified in Exhibit C.
Exhibit C includes an estimated.budget for the
design, engineering and construction of the Phase i Museum.
This budget has been prepared by.consultants retained by the
Foundation and it is the responsibility of the Foundation to
function within the dollar cost set forth in Exhibit C.
11. SELECTION OF THE PHASE i MUSEUM CONTRACTOR. The
Foundation shall solicit bids for the construction of the
Phase i Museum. The Phase i Museum shall be constructed by
contract or contractor's licensed by the State of California
(the "Contractor"). The Contractor shall be required to
provide performance and payment bonds, each in a principal
amount equal to 100% of the contract price, and to name the
City and Foundation and their employees, officers,
directors, agents and consultants thereof as additional
insureds under a comprehensive general liability insurance
policy with coverage broad enough to include contractual
obligations under such construction contract and in an
amount not less than Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000.00) per
occurrence. The bid and contract documents shall include
the bond and insurance requirements as set forth by mutual
agreement of the City and Foundation at the time of
advertising for bids and said requirements shall not be less
than those stated above.
Prior to the award'of any bid'for the Phase 1
Museum, the Foundation shall demonstrate to the City that it
has funds sufficient to cover the award of the bid. No
award of a contract for the Phase i Museum shall be made
unless funds, not otherwise committed by prior construction
contracts are available to cover the contract award,
including a contingency amount equal to 10% of the contract
price and all cbsts for building permit and inspection fees
to the City.
12. CONSTRUCTION OF PHASE 1 iMUSEUM.
A. The Foundation shall have responsibility for
administering the construction contracts awarded for the
Phase 1 Museum.
1071219~.2 '6-
Hay 27, 199~
B. Before commencement of construction or
development of the Phase i Museum, the Foundation shall, at
its own expense, s~c~i~e or cause to be secured any and all
grading, building and other required permits which may be
required by the City and any other governmental agency
having jurisdiction as to such construction, development or
work.
C. The Foundation shall promptly begin and
thereafter diligently prosecute to completion the
construction of the improvements and the development of the
Phase i Museum in accordance with the Schedule of
Performance. The Schedule of Performance is subject to
revision from time-to-time as mutually agreed upon in
writing between the Foundation and the City.
The Foundation shall submit to the City written
reports of the progress of the construction. The reports
shall be in the same form and in the same detail as normally
prepared for internal reports of the Foundation or for
reports from the Foundation's general contractor to the
Foundation.
D. For the purpose of assuring compliance with
this Agreement, representatives of the City shall have the
right of access to the Property, without charges or fees,
during normal business hours during the period of
construction, so long as they comply with all safety rules.
Such representatives of the City shall be those who are so
identified in writing by the City Manager.
E. No change order may be approved by the
Foundation for the Phase i Museum in an amount in excess of
the construction budget contained in Exhibit C without
demonstrating to the City that there are sufficient
uncommitted funds available to the for such purposes.
F. The Foundation shall prepare and execute a
Notice of Completion for the Phase I Museum, record said
Notice with the Office of the Recorder of the County of
Riverside, State of California, and cause the Contractor and
all subcontractors to provide lien and material releases
with respect thereto. The Foundation shall provide copies
of each said notice and all releases to the City.
13. DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF THE SUBSEQUENT PHASES.
The City and Foundation shall follow the same procedure
described in Paragraphs 10, 11 and 12 to design and
construct any subsequent phases of the Museum.
10712194.2 --7--
Nay 27,
14. OPERATION OF THE MUSEUM.
~'A. The'Foundation shall establish, maintain and
operate the Temecula Museum on the Property, beginning upon
issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the Phase 1
Museum, and throughout the term of this Agreement. Such use
may include all activities reasonably related to the Museum
operation including exhibition, restoration and storage of
the Temecula Museum Collection, archival storage, office
administration, operation of a museum shop, educational
programs, and public/private events. The "Museum" shall
mean a professional quality, non-profit museum located on
the Property and operated by the Foundation for the
preservation, interpretation and exhibition of the Temecula
Museum Collection, and for public education regarding the
Temecula region.
B. The "Temecula Museum Collection" shall mean
all art objects, artifacts, papers, photographs,
architectural elements and other items of aesthetic,
cultural or historical significance relating to the Temecula
region owned by the Foundation or by any third person and
loaned or entrusted to the Foundation for preservation,
interpretation and exhibition.
C. The Foundation shall, at all times, maintain
the status of a tax-exempt entity under the provisions of
the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended.
D. The Temecula Museum shall be operated
according to the standards and suggested guidelines of the
American Association of Museums (AAM), or of any
organization which may, from time to time, be generally
recognized as an organization organized and operated to
promote standards of excellence for the museum profession,
comparable to the AAM, and which describe standards and
guidelines therefore. Such standards and guidelines shall
address the following:
(i)
Restoration, storage and interpretation
of the Temecula Museum Collection; and
Curatorial responsibility, including the
care, conservation, protection,
exhibition, interpretation, loan and use
of the Temecula Museum Collection.
E. Recognizing the unique combination of a
public museum within a public park, the Foundation shall
utilize the Property to exhibit works of art, operate a
museum shop, hold receptions, previews, benefits and other
107121~4.Z -8-
Hay 27~ 1~9~
educational and fund raising activities, all related to the
Temecula Museum, with consideration and respect for other
uses of-th~ Park.' ....
F. The Foundation shall retain at all times
during the term of this Agreement qualified, professional
curators and a trained staff sufficient to maintain the
Temecula Museum Collection and Museum programs in a manner
consistent with the standards of a professional museum, as
defined above.
G. The Foundation shall provide at its sole cost
and expense, a complete and appropriate security system or
arrangement for the protection of the interior of the
Property and the Temecula Museum'Collection therein. The
City shall not be responsible for providing any necessary or
appropriate security to or for the Property or any of the
Temecula Museum Collection located therein. Mechanical and
electrical detection/security systems and fire suppression
system for the Property shall be actively integrated into
the mechanical and electrical detection/security systems and
fire suppression system of the Museum.
H. The Foundation shall post and maintain
regular hours of operation for the Museum.
15. STRUCTURES AND FIXTURES. All structures and
fixtures placed onthe Property by the Foundation shall
become the property of the City at the end of the term of
the Agreement. The Foundation shall have no right to remove
such structures and fixtures at any time during the term or
after the termination of this Agreement.
16. SURRENDER OF PROPERTY. On expiration or sooner
termination of this Agreement, or any extensions or renewal
of this Lease, the Foundation shall promptly surrender and
deliver the Property to the City including, the structures
and fixtures thereon and the Museum.
17. REPAIRS.
A. At all times during the term of this
Agreement, the' Foundation shall, at the Foundation's own
cost and expenWe, and at no cost and expense to the City,
maintain the Property and all portions of the Property
including the structures and fixtures thereon in good order
and repair and make all repairs a~d replacements that may
become necessary to the Property, any buildings or
improvements on the Property, or any sidewalks, or driveways
that are part of, or appurtenant to the Property. Any and
all repairs and replacements required by this provision,
107121~4.2 --9--
Nay 27,
both ordinary and extraordinary and both structural and
nonstructural, shall be made promptly by the Foundation as
required and shalI'comply with all applicable governmental
laws, ordinances, and regulations. The Foundation hereby
waives the provisions of sections 1941 and 1942 of the
California Civil Code relating to the City's duty for
tenantable premises and the Foundation'$ right to make
repairs and deduct the expenses of such repairs from the
rent.
B. If theFoundation fails to maintain the
Property as described in subparagraph A, the City may give
written notice of such deficiency to the Foundation. If the
City gives notice to the Foundation of a deficiency, the
Foundation shall have thirty (30) business days within which
to take reasonable steps to cure the deficiency. If the
Foundation has not commenced corrective activity within such
thirty (30) days, the City may elect to take the steps
necessary to insure that the Property is maintained as
described in subparagraph A. At least fifteen (15) days
prior to entering the Property to perform any such
corrective work, the City shall either personally serve a
notice of its intent to enter the Property for this purpose
on the Foundation or mail a copy of such notice by certified
mail to the Foundation's last known address, or as shown on
the tax rolls. The City may enter the Property to perform
such corrective work as it reasonably considers necessary
and proper to return the Property to its proper condition as
described in subparagraph A. The City may act either
through its own employees or through an independent
contractor to perform such corrective work.
If the City incurs costs, including administrative
costs and attorney's fees in returning the Property to its
proper condition pursuant to the procedure set forth
above', the City may make a demand upon the Foundation for
payment of such costs as are reasonable under the
circumstances. If Foundation fails to pay such costs within
thirty (30) business days after the date demand is made,
this Agreement shall terminate.
18. ALTERATIONS. The Foundation may not make any
alterations (other than insubstantial ones) to the Property
or structures thereon without the City's prior written
consent, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld.
19. UTILITIES. The Foundation agrees to pay for all
utilities, including telephone, water, gas, electricity, and
any and all other services which may be used in or upon the
Property during the term of this Agreement without liability
of the City. For each service, the Foundation shall pay the
10712194.2 '10-
Nay 27,
cost for the use of the service directly to the utility
provider prior to the time that the charge becomes
delinquent; ....
20. MECHANICS' LIENS. Pursuant to Section 3094 of the
California Civil Code, the Foundation shall cause a Notice
of Non-responsibility to be posted on the Property prior to
beginning of construction. The City shall cause a Notice of
Non-responsibility to be recorded concurrently with the
execution of the Agreement.
The Foundation hereby agrees to keep the Property,
including the Museum, free and clear of mechanics' liens and
other liens for labor, service, supplies, equipment, or
materials. The Foundation also agrees to fully pay and
discharge and wholly protect and save harmless the City
against any and all demands or claims that may or could
ripen into such liens or labor claims. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, the Foundation may, if the Foundation furnishes
the City with a bond or other security against loss or
liability by reason thereof in a form acceptable to the
City, contest, at the Foundation's sole cost and expense,
any such liens or claims and litigate the same to final
judgment.
21. ALIENABILITY OF PROPERTY. Nothing in this
Agreement shall be construed to restrict the'alienability of
the Park. The City retains the right to sell or encumber
the Park, including the Property, at any time during the
term of this Agreement.
22. TAXES. During the term of this Agreement, the
Foundation shall pay before delinquency: (1) all taxes,
assessments, license fees, and any other charges of any type
whatsoever that are levied, assessed, charged, or imposed on
or against the Foundation's possessory interest and/or
personal property installed or located in or on the Property
and that become payable during the term of this Agreement;
and, (2) all real property taxes and general and special
assessments levied and assessed against the Property.
23. WASTE OR NUISANCE. The Foundation shall not
commit or permit the commission by others of any waste on
the Property, ihcluding graffiti. The Foundation shall not
maintain, commit, or permit the maintenance or commission of
any nuisance as defined in Section 3479 of the California
Civil Code on the Property. The Foundation shall not use or
permit the use of said Property for any unlawful purpose.
1071219~.2 '11-
Nay 27, 1994
24. INDEMNITY AND INSURANCE. The Foundation agrees to
indemnify, defend and hold the City harmless from and
against-any and aiI 'claims arising from any act, omission or
negligence of the Foundation, or its contractors, licensees,
agents, servants, or employees, or arising from any
accident, injury or damage whatsoever caused to any person
or property occurring in, on, or about the Property, the
sidewalks adjoining the Property, and from and against all
costs, expenses and liabilities incurred in or in connection
with any such claim or proceeding brought thereon,
including, but not limited to, court costs and reasonable
attorney's fees.
The Foundation shall maintain in full force during
the term of this Agreement, a policy or policies of general
liability insurance in the minimum amount for the first year
of the term of this Agreement of One Million Dollars
($1,000,000.00) combined single-limit per occurrence for
bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. Upon
the final inspection for certificate of occupancy for the
Phase I Museum described, the amount of said insurance shall
increase to Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000.00). The
Foundation shall name the City as an additional insured on
such policies. The Foundation shall furnish the City with a
Certificate of Insurance with respect to such policy or
policies prior to entry on the Property. The policies shall
further be endorsed with a "broad form" endorsement so as to
provide comprehensive general liability insurance for the
joint benefit of'the City.
The Foundation shall maintain in force, at the
Foundation's expense, a policy or policies of insurance
protecting against the following:
(1)
Fire, earthquake and other perils normally
included in the extended coverage insurance with
special form, to the extent of at least one-
hundred percent (100%) of the insurable value of
the building(s) and. other improvements placed on
the Property pursuant to the Agreement, exclusive
of trade fixtures and equipment and personal
property, including the Temecula Museum Collection
belonging to the Foundation.
(2)
Fire and extended coverage insurance with respect
to the equipment and personal property, including
the Temecula Museum Coliection located on the
Property with vandalism and malicious mischief
endorsements to the extent of one-hundred percent
(100%) of their insurehie value. During the term
of this Agreement, the proceeds of any such policy
107121f~.2
Nay 27,
-12-
or policies for fire insurance should be used
solely for the repair or replacement of the
"fixtures'a~ personal property so insured.
(3)
The Foundation shall furnish the City with a
Certificate of Insurance with respect to all
policy or policies required pursuant to this
Agreement prior to entry on the Property, and
occupancy of any buildings constructed or
relocated onto the Property. If any such
insurance required in this Agreement has a
deductible clause, the deductible amount shall not
exceed $10,00.0.00 per occurrence, and the
Foundation shall be liable for any such deductible
amount.
The coverage amounts for all of the above
insurance requirements shall increase annually at a rate
equal to the Consumer Price Index for Riverside County.
25. NON-LIABILITY OF OFFICIALS AND EMPLOYEES OF THE
CITY. No member, official or employee of the City shall be
personally liable to the Foundation pursuant to the
provisions of this Agreement, nor for any default or breach
by the City.
26. INSOLVENCY. The insolvency of the Foundation as
evidenced by a receiver being appointed to take possession
of all or substantially all of the property of the
Foundation, or the making of a general assignment for the
benefit of creditors by the Foundation, shall terminate the
Agreement and entitle the City to re-enter and regain
possession of the Property.
27. ABANDONMENT. In the event that the Foundation
shall'be absent from the Property for a period of 30 days
after default in.payment of rent or other obligations
imposed on the Foundation by this Agreement, such absence
shall be deemed to constitute an abandonment of the
Foundation's interest in the Property and an abandonment by
the Foundation of any personal property left on the
Property, and the City may thereupon reenter the Property as
hereinbefore prgvided.
28. INSPECTION OF BOOKS AND RECORDS.
Each party has the right to ~nspect, at reasonable
times, the books and records of the other pertaining to the
Property as pertinent to the purposes of this Agreement.
lo712196.2 -13 -
May 27, 1994
29. ENTRY BY CITY.
'A. The'C'ity may enter upon the Property and the
structures thereon during normal operating hours for the
purpose of inspecting the Property.
B. The City or its authorized representatives
shall be granted entry to the Property in the event of
emergency. Key access to Property shall be limited to the
City Manager, Police. Chief, Fire Chief, and their designated
emergency personnel.
30. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS. During the term of this
Agreement and any renewals hereof, the Foundation shall
comply with all ordinances and regulations of the City of
Temecula, orders and requirements imposed by the Health and
Police Departments, and all Federal, State and County and
the City statutes, ordinances, regulations, laws or other
requirements concerning all matters applicable to the use,
occupancy or operation of the Property.
31. NONDISCRIMINATION. The Foundation herein
covenants by and for itself, its heirs, executors,
administrators and assigns, and all persons claiming under
or through it, and this Agreement is made and accepted upon
and subject to the following conditions:
That there shall be no discrimination against or
segregation of any person or group of persons on
account of race, color, creed, religion, sex,
marital status, national origin or ancestry in the
leasing, subleasing, transferring, use occupancy,
tenure or enjoyment of the Property, nor shall the
Foundation itself, or any person claiming under or
through it, establish or permit any such practice
or practices of discrimination or segregation with
reference to the selection, location, number, use,
occupancy of tenants, lessees, sublessees,
subtenants or vendees in the Property herein
leased.
32. DAMAGE/DESTRUCTION. If the Property or the
structures thereon is damaged or destroyed in whole or in
part by fire of other casualty, the Foundation shall repair
or restore the Property or the structures thereon to
substantially the same condition as they were in immediately
before destruction, provided that.the insurance proceeds to
the Foundation payable on account of such damage or
destruction are sufficient to fund all of the costs of such
repair and restoration. The Foundation shall commence and
complete all such repair and restoration. If the Foundation
10712194.2 -14 -
Hay 27, 1~
does not commence such repair or restoration within thirty
(30) days after such damage or destruction occurs or if
repair or"~estorat'fo~'will require more than one hundred
twenty (120) days to complete, the Foundation may, at its
option, terminate this Agreement by giving the City written
notice of its election to do so at any time prior to the
commencement of such repair or restoration and by paying
over any insurance proceeds to the City. In that event,
this Agreement shall terminate as of the date such notice is
delivered by the Foundation.
33. LEGAL ACTIONS. Any legal actions related to or
arising out of this Agreement must be instituted in the
Superior Court of the County of Riverside, State of
California, in an appropriate municipal court in that
county, or, if federal jurisdiction exists, in the Federal
DistrictsCourt in the Central District of California. In
the event such litigation is filed by one party against the
other to enforce its rights under this Agreement, the
prevailing party, as determined by the Court's judgment,
shall be entitled to reasonable attorney fees and litigation
expenses for the relief granted.
The laws of the State of California shall govern
the interpretation and enforcement of this Agreement.
34. RIGHTS AND REMEDIES ARE CUMULATIVE. Except as
otherwise expressly stated in this Agreement, the rights and
remedies of the parties are cumulative, and the exercise by
party of one or more of such rights or remedies shall not
preclude the exercise by it, at the same or different times,
of any other rights or remedies for the same default or any
other default by any other party.
35. INACTION NOT A WAIVER OF DEFAULT. Any failures or
delays by any party in asserting any of its rights and
remedies as to any default shall not operate as a waiver of
any default or of any such rights or remedies, or deprive
either such party of its right to institute and maintain any
actions or proceedings which it may deem necessary to
protect, assert or enforce any such rights or remedies.
36. DEFAULT, NOTICE OF DEFAULT,'BREACH. A default in
the performanc~ of any promise of, or of any obligation
imposed upon the City or Foundation shall not constitute a
breach of this Agreement unless the party in default fails
to cure such default within thirt9 (30) days after the
written notice of default has been served, except that
failure to cure a default in the payment of rent shall
constitute a breach of this Agreement if such default is not
cured within five (5) days after written notice of default
10712194.2 '15-
Nay 27, 199~
has been served. No party shall be in default of any
required performance if delay in performance results from
fire, flood, storm; war, act of God or other causes beyond
the party's reasonable control. If any party breaches this
Agreement, the other party shall be entitled to pursue every
legal and equitable remedy available, including (but not
limited to) the right to terminate this Agreement. The
City, in addition to other remedies it may have, shall have
the immediate right to reentry, and may remove all persons
and property from the Property. The City may store such
property at the cost of the Foundation.
37. DAMAGES. If a default is not fully cured by the
defaulting party as provided in Section 39, the defaulting
party shall be liable to the other party for any damages
caused by such default, and the nondefaulting party may
thereafter (but not before) commence an action for damages
against the defaulting party with respect to such default.
38. SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE. If a default under this
Agreement is not fully cured by the defaulting party, the
nondefaulting party at its option may thereafter (but not
before) commence an action for specific performance of this
Agreement.
39. UNLAWFUL DETAINER. In the event of any breach of
this Agreement by the Foundation, the City, in addition to
any other rights or remedies it may have, may give the
Foundation a three-day notice to cure the breach or quit the
premises. If the Foundation fails to do either, the City
may bring a statutory proceeding in unlawful detainer to
regain possession of the Property.
40. TERMINATION. The City shall have the right to
terminate this Agreement if the Foundation is in default of
this Agreement, as defined in Paragraph36 hereof or if any
of the following situations.exists:
1. The Museum is destroyed or substantially
damaged to the extent that it would be, in
the reasonable discretion of the City,
economically unfeasible to repair.
The Museum is substantially damaged or
destroyed by any cause whatsoever, and there
are not sufficient insurance proceeds
available to repai~ or rebuild the Museum.
The Foundation ceases to operate the Museum
on regular basis·
1071219~.2
Nay 27, 1~4
-16-
Should the Foundation be unable to perform its obligations
pursuant to the Agreement, nothing shall prohibit the City
from designating aNOther agent to perform those functions.
41. BINDING ON SUCCESSORS. The provisions of this
Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the
benefit of the heirs, successors, assigns and legal
representatives of the parties hereto. Nothing in this
paragraph shall be construed as a consent by the City to any
assignment of this Agreement or any interest therein by the
Foundation except as provided in Paragraph 4 of this
-Agreement.
42. NOTICES AND PAYMENTS. Whenever notices and
payments are required to be given pursuant to the provisions
of this Agreement, they shall be sent to the party, in
writing and postage prepaid by registered mail, addressed as
follows:
To the City at:
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
Attention: City Manager
To the Foundation at:
The Old Town Temecula
Historical Museum Foundation,
A California Non-Profit Public
Benefit Corporation
P.O. Box 792
Temecula, CA 92590 ·
Attention:
Any party may change such address by written
notice by registered mail to the other parties.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this
Agreement the day and year first above written.
107121f4,2 '17-
May 27, 1994
CITY OF TEMECULA,
THE OLD TOWN TEMECULA
HISTORICAL MUSEUM FOUNDATION
a California Non-Profit Public
Benefit Corporation
By:
RON ROBERTS
Mayor
ATTEST:
By:
JUNE S. GREEK
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By:
PETER M. THORSON
City Attorney
10712194.2
Nay Z7, 1W4
-18-
EXEMPT RECORDING REQUESTED BY
City of Temecula
PER GOV'-T-CODE § 61'03'-
AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO
City of Temecula
43172 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92390
MAIL TAX STATEMENTS TO
City of Temecula
43172 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92390
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE
CORPORA TION GRANT DEED
The undersigned grantor declares:
FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged,
SAM HICKS MONUMENT PARK FOUNDATION, a non-profit corporation, a corporation
organized under the laws of the State of California, hereby grants to the CITY' OF
TEMECULA, a body corporate and politic, the following described real property in the
City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California:
See Exhibit "A" attached hereto.
This. conveyance is made subject to those covenants and restrictions contained in that
certain Agreement, executed by t~ancv Maurice dated October 9 , 19 90,
and recorded on Official Records of Riverside County, California and upon condition
that said property be used solely and perpetually for historical, educational, public park
and/or public recreational purposes. If said property is not used solely and perpetually
for historical, educational, public park and/or public recreational purposes, then
Grantor or its assigns, and successors, without paying any compensation for any
buildings or other improvements or betterments that may then be upon said premises,
and without making any compensation or incurring any liability for damages or losses
Of any kind, shall have the power to terrainate all right, title, and interest in the
property' gr.anted by this deed to Grantee and its successors and assigns, in the
manner provided by law for the exercise of this power of termination, and shall
thereupon have and enjoy forever all property granted by this deed, as if this
-1-
EXHIBIT A-1
conveyance had not been made. Grantee, its assigns or successors, shall thereupon
immediately surrender possession of said property, and shall forfeit all rights thereto
as required hereunder. Provided, however, that Grantor may not exercise this power
to terminate unless, within ninety (90) days after the breach of the use restriction,
written notice is given to the Grantee of the breach, and Grantee fails-to correct the
breach within ninety (90) days after receiving notice of the breach of the use
restriction.
xecu d on April 9 , 19 91, at
SAM ICKS NT PARK ,FOUNDATION
statements as directed above.
Temecula
, California.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA )
On this 9th day of April , in the year 19 91 , before me,
Susan W. Jones , a notary public, personally appeared Nancy Maurice ,
proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person who executed the
within instrument as president of the corporation therein named and acknowledged
to me that the corporation executed it.
Notary Public
State of California
My commission expires:
November le , 19 94
OFFICIAL SEAL
SUSAN W. JONES
Notan/Publc-Collfotnla
Novemb~ ~8,
CONSENT
The City of Temecula hereby consents to the grant of real property set
forth above.
City of Temecula
By: Ron~J. Parks
Mayor
Attest:
By:
ju-Z,~- - ~,
ne S. Greek
City Clerk
Approved As To Form:
By: ~/~.~
Scott F Fiel/:l
City Attorney
-3-
EXHIBIT
In the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, descited as follows:
That portion of Lot 6, and of the unnamed road in Block 2, as shown by Map of
Subdivision of the Pauba Land and Water Company, in the County of Riverside, State
of California, as shown by Map on file in Book 11, Page 507 of Maps, Records of San
Diego County, California, described as follows:
Beginning at the most westerly corner of Lot 32, Block 1, of the Town of Temecula
as shown by Map on file in Book 15, Page 726 of Maps, Records of San Diego
County, California; thence South ~.~. degrees 25'05= West, along the Northwesterly
boundary of said town of Temecula, a distance of 141.45 feet to a point on the
Northerly right of way line of an unnamed road (60 feet wide) as described in
dedication and easement deed to the County of Riverside by deed recorded April 22,
1969 as Instrument No. 39504 of Official Records of Riverside County, California;
thence Westerly continuing along said Northerly line being the arc of a tangent curve
concave Northerly and having a radius of 375.78 feet through a central angle of 19
degrees 01'17", a distance of 124.75 feet; thence North 17 degrees 08'42" East,
along the Easterly line of said unnamed road a distance of 290.87 feet; thence South
45 degrees 02'38" East, a distance of 271.16 feet to the point of beginning.
RECORDING REQUESTED BY
COMMOHWEALTH LAND TITLE
~~, ~. 92590
~UeOH~No. 176437 ~owNo. 02308-H
PARTNERSHIP GRANT DEED
THE UNDERSIGNED GRANTOR(s) DF-.CLARE(s)
rl , unincorporated area
Parcel No,
XX computed on fuU vtiue of property conveyed,
C3 comWuted on full value less vslue of lJens or encumbrancos remaining at tile of sale. and '.
FOR A VAI. UABLE CONSIDER. ATION, receipt oE which is hereby gcknowledgecl,
TEI, tECULA HOTEL i~l~a California Limited Partnership
hereby GRANT(S) to
CITY OF TE~XCULA, a Municipal Corporation
[hefollowlnfdescdbedrulpropertyinthe '7~/77~/'~
countyor RIVERSIDE ,staleofC4lKomb:
PARCEL 2 OF PARCEL HAP 24038 AS SHOWN BY MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 171, PAGES
71 and 72 OF PARCEL'MAPS, RECORDS OF SAID' COUNTY
TEItECULA HOTEL PARTNERS
Dated June '15, 1992 a California Limitid Partnership
pa.~tp ~,t ~e~ied ~e wl~!n ~stzument, and scknowiad8~d
to me that such partnership executed the same.
WITNESS my hind and official seal
Signature %~4~ ~ ·
Ns~e(Typed or Printed)
OFFICIAL SEAL
NANL'Y LIN.',~'
NOTARY PUBLIC - CALIFORNIA
LOS NIQE!~ COUNTY
~ com~ e~IH~ $EP 14,
(Spate above for official notaxial seal)
MAIL TAX STATEMENTS TO PARTY SHOWN ON FOLLOWING LINE; IF NO PARTY SO SHOWN, MAlL AS DIRECTED ABOVE
.(
.~ // , \ ~{4~}* .'
-- I
Design ............................................$ 32,000
Church Restoration ........................... $ 84,000
Museum Construction ....................... $384,000
TOTAL .................$ 500.000
Dated: Mey 25, 1994
March 28, 1994 ..................... Schematic Design Proceeding
April 25, 1994 ......................Schematic Design Complete
May 2, 1994 ......................... Authorization for Design
Development/Construction Documents.
June 20, 1994 ......................Construction Documents Complete
June 22, 1994 ......................Plan Check Submittal
July 27, 1994 .......................Plan Check Complete
August 1, 1994 .....................Authorization to Obtain Bids
August 29, 1994 ................... Bids Received
September 12, 1994 .............. Award of Contract
September 14, 1994 ............ '..Begin Construction
March 27, 1994 .................... Construction Complete
Deed: May 25, 1994
EXHIBIT D
.... SCHEDU~.R OF PERFORMANCE
Execution of Agreement
Agreement shall be
authorized, executed and
delivered by the Foundation
to City.
On or before June 1, 1994
Final Drawings and Plans
The Foundation shall submit
final drawings and plans to
City for issuance of
building permits for the
Church and the Phase 1
Museum
On or before September 1, 1994
Start of Construction
The Foundation shall begin
construction of the Phase 1
Museum and the Church.
On or before January 1, 1995
Completion of Phase 1
The Foundation shall obtain
a certificate of occupancy
or final inspection for the
Church and the Phase 1
Museum.
On or before January 1, 1996
EXHIBIT E
SCOPE OF DEVELOPMENT
I. GENERAL DESCRIPTION
The Property consists of two sites, one for Museum of
approximately 22,900 square feet ("Site 1") and the second for the Church
of approximately 1,200 square feet ("Site 2"). They are generally located
within Sam Hicks Monument Park.
The Foundation shall develop at least a 6,100 square foot Museum,
an 1,S00 square foot plaza and a 1,000 square foot.outdoor interpretire
center on Site and remodel St. Catherine's Church on Site 2. The
Foundation may expand the Museum building to 22,900 square feet.
The Foundation shall construct or cause the construction of the
Museum building. Said building shall be constructed of masonry, concrete
or concrete block, steel, or other such materials. Prefabricated metal
panels or components shall not be utilized for exterior walls, unless
specifically approved by the City.
A. Architecture and Design.
The Museum shall be of high architectural quality, and shall be
effectively and aesthetically designed. The shape, scale of volume,
exterior design and exterior finish of each building shall be visually an.
physically related to and an enhancement of each other.
B. Signs.
Signs shall be limited in size, subdued and otherwise designed to
contribute positively to the environment. Signs identifying the building
use will be permitted, but their height, size, location, color, lighting
and design will be subject to City approval and shall conform to the
Temecula Municipal Code. .. ~
C. Building Setbacks
Building setbacks shall be approved by the City andshall conform
to the Temecula Municipal Code.
D. Buil~in~ HeiGht
zoning.
Building Height shall not exceed that permitted by the applicable
E. Access
Drawing.
Vehicular access shall be as shown on approval Basic Concept
E-1
F. Loadinu
Adequate loading and unloading space shall be provided as
required by Temecula Municipal Code. Loading spaces visible from streets
shall be landscaped or screened to prevent an unsightly or barren
appearance.
G. Screening
All outdoor storage of materials or equipment shall be enclosed
or screened by walls, landscaping or enclosure. to the extent and in the
manner required by the City.
H. Utilities
Allutilities on the Property to serve the Museum and Church
shall be underground or enclosed at Foundation's expense whenever
physically and economically feasible, or when not feasible, all above-
ground utilities shall be placed at the rear of the two Sites.
I. Parking
On site parking shall be as required by the Temecula Municipal
Code.
J. Painting
All exterior painted walls shall be painted by the Foundation
with a color(s) subject to City approval which approval shall not be
unreasonably withheld if consistent with manufacturer's requirements.
III. EASEMENTS
The City shall grant and permit or cause the granting and
permission of all necessary and appropriate easements and rights for the
development of the Property, including but not limited to temporary
construction easements and easements and rights of vehicular access,
pedestrian access, parking, structural support, sanitary sewers, storm
drains, water, electrical power, telephone, natural gas, as are necessary
for and consistent with the develo'3ment as contemplated herein.
E-2
IV. CONTROLS AND RESTRICTIONS - MISCELLANEOUS
Controls and restrictions consistent with this Agreement
including but not limited to minimum size parking spaces and minimum
loading facilities shall be consistent with the Temecula Municipal Code.
Ve
IMPROVEMENTS, FACILITIES, UTILITIES, DEMOLITION, SITE/ACQUISITION
PARCEL CLEARANCE, AND ON AND OFF SITE PARCEL WORK
The Foundation shall provide or cause to be provided at its cost
and expense, the improvements such as curbs and sidewalks, utilities. The
description of such items in this Paragraph V is for the purpose of
establishing general guidelines to assist the parties in the preparation of
plans and specifications. The plans and specifications, when approved by
the parties as provided in the Agreement, shall embody the work which is
the obligation of the Foundation.
All improvements to be constructed by the Foundation shall be
constructed or installed in accordance with the technical specifications,
standards and practices of the City and in accordance with approved plans
and specifications. The Foundation's plans for such public improvements
shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to advertising
for bids. All such activities shall be completed in accordance with high
architectural standards at a time and in a manner consistent with the
Foundation's design and construction.
E-3
ITEM NO. 24
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
APPRO~~
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICERi
CITY MANAGER
!
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Manager/City Council
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
June 14, 1994
Consideration of Entertainment Licensing Ordinance
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council introduce and read by title only, an
ordinance entitled:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ADDING CHAPTER 9.10, 'SPECIAL LICENSES--BARS,
NIGHT CLUBS, DANCE HALLS, POOLROOMS, ETC.,' TO THE
TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE
DISCUSSION:
The draft entertainment licensing ordinance addresses concerns expressed by the City
Council of the need to have better controls over certain entertainment activities within the
City. The draft ordinance defines the types of uses requiring a special license and requires
that the users obtain zi license from the City prior to conducting business.
The process to be utilized to obtain a license is that the operator would apply for license on
an application form provided by the City. The application would be filed with the Chief of
Police. The operator would also pay a fee as established by Resolution of the City Council
sufficient to cover the processing costs of such license application. The license would
then be valid for one'year if issued.
Upon receipt of the application, the Chief of Police or designee would conduct an
investigation. into the applicant and the operation. This investigation may involve a criminal
background check which will require a separate enabling ordinance to effectuate. As the
City Council has previously adopted another ordinance which requires background
investigations, our office will prepare such an ordinance for your consideration in the near
future.
R:~Agendd:tpt~juereng I
Agenda Report - Licensing Ordinance
June 14, 1994
Page 2
Unless one of the causes to deny the license are found by the Chief of Police, the Chief
will issue the license. However, if any of the following are found, the license is to be
denied by the Chief:
That the applicant does not fulfill the specific requirements for such license
as set forth in this Chapter.
That the applicant has made any false or misleading statement in his/her
application.
Ce
That the licensed business has been operated in an illegal, improper, or
disorderly manner.
That the licensed business has been operated in a manner that is detrimental
to the public health, public morals, or public order.
The ordinance also requires that once the license is issued, that it be displayed in a
prominent place at the business, that it is not transferable, and that separate licenses be
obtained for each separate business and that duplicate licenses be obtained for same
business conducted at more than one location. The ordinance also provides for the
issuance of temporary permits to operate when the investigation period would pose a
hardship to an applicant. In the event a business becomes a problem, there is a provision
to suspend and revoke the 'license. The denial or revocation of the license is subject to
appeal to the City Council.
The draft ordinance also limits the hours of operation of such uses by prohibiting them
from operating between 2:00 a.m. and 6:00 a.m. of any day. This prohibition of operation
between those hours does not restrict the City Council or Planning Commission's authority
in limiting the hours of operation for a particular business to more restrictive hours than set
forth in this ordinance.
Finally, certain conduct is prohibited within the ordinance such as being intoxicated,
boisterous, or disorderly within any of the enumerated businesses and makes a violation of
the provisions of the ordinance a misdemeanor which carries with it a potential jail term of
six months, a fine of up to $1,000, or both such a fine and jail term.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The fiscal impact of the licensing program should be minimal as it provides within itself for
cost recovery from the applicants.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. The draft ordinance.
R:~a, gendaRpt~Licemeg 2
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA ADDING CHAFFER 9.10, *SPECIAL
LICENSF, S--BARS, NIGHT CLUBS, DANCE HALLS,
POOLROOMS, ETC.," TO THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL
CODE
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES I-IF~R~RY ORDAIN
AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. City Ordinance No. 90-04 adopted by reference certain portions of the
non-codi~ed Riverside County Ordinances. On the effective date of this Ordinance,
Riverside County Ordinance No. 366, adopted by reference by City Ordinance No. 90-04
relating to rcgula~on and licensing Public Dance Hails, Public Dances and Club Dances is
hereby repealed.
Section 2. Chapter 9.10, "Special Licenses -- Bars, Nightclubs, Dance Halls,
Poolrooms, etc. ," is hereby added to the Temecula Municip~ Code to read as follows:
"CHAPTER 9.10
SPECIAL LICENSES - BARS, NIGHTCLUBS,
DANCE HALLS, POOLROOMS, ETC.
Sections:
9.10.010
9.10.020
9.10.030
9.10.040
9.10.050
9.10.060
9.10.070
9.10.080
9.10.090
9.10.100
9.10.110
9.10.120
9.10.130
9.10.140
9.10.150
Definitions.
License required.
Multiple businesses.
Chief of police.
Applications.
Fees.
Duration.
Standards for consideration of license.
Investigation and issuance.
License.
Inspection.
Display of license.
Multiple licenses: duplicate licenses.
License not transferable.
Temporary permits.
r:\ORD3\55 I
9.10.160
9.10.170
9.10.180
9.10.190
9.10.200
9.10.210
Revocation.
Alt~als.
Regufafi/3~s: Hours of dance hall, bars. and night clubs.
Regulations: Disorderly conduct.
Prohibited conduct.
Applicability of regulations to existing business.
9.10.010 Definitions.
A. 'Bar' means any established place of business upon which alcoholic beverages
arc sold for consumption on the premises.
B. 'Dance Hall' means any place open to the public where dancing is participated
in, either as the main purpose of the establishment, or as incidental to some 9ther purpose,
and to which premises the public is admitted, either with or without charge.
C. 'Established place of business' means the place where any person, fn'm, or
corporation conducts any retail or other establishment having a permanent address and being
regularly open for business from day to day during ordinary business hours.
D. 'Night Club' means any established place of business where amplified musical
entertainment is offered.
E. 'Poolroom' means any place open to the public where billiards, pool, or
bagatelle is played, except a private house and except the rooms of a bona fide fraternal
organization, where the general public is allowed to play therein, whether any compensation
or reward is charged for the use of such tables or not.
9.10.020 License required.
It shall be unlawful for any person, firm, or corporation to engage in, conduct,
manage, or carry on any of the following businesses, practices, professions, or occupations
within the area of the City of Temecula without first having obtained a license therefor in
accordance with this Chapter:
A. Bar;
B. Dance Hall;
C. Night Club; or,
D. Poolroom.
r:\ORJ3S%66 2
9.10,030 Multiple businesses.
This Chapter shall apply to each and every business, trade, occupation, profession, or
practice herfin enumerated and conducted in the City of Temecula, whether carried on
individually or in conjunction with any other ac-~ivity.
9.10.040 Chief of police.
All licenses issued pursuant to this Chapter shall be issued by the Chief of Police.
9.10.050 Applications.
The Chief of Police shall receive all applications for licenses and shall provide such
application forms as are necessary for the convenience of the public and the economic and
efficient administration of this Chapter.
9.10.060 Fees.
The City Council shall provide, by Resolution thereof, the amount of each fee to be
charged for each application or license or both such application and license.
9.10,070 Duration.
Each license shall be in effect for one year from the date on which it was issued.
9.10.080 Standards for consideration of license applications.
The Chief of Police shall deny the application for a license if he/she makes any of the
following findings:
A. That the applicant does not fulfill the specific requirements for such license as
set forth in this Chapter.
B. That the applicant has made any fal. se or misleading statement in his/her
application.
C. That the licensed business has been operated in an illegal, improper, or
disorderly manner.
r:\ORDS\66 3
D. That the licensed business has been operated in a manner that is detrimental to
the public health, public morals, or public order.
9.10.090 Investigation and issuance.
Prior to issuing the license, the Chief of Police shall make such investigation as
he/she deems necessary to determine whether the applicant meets the requirements and
qualifications for such license, and shall thereafter either issue a license to the applicant or
shall notify the applicant in writing that his/her application is denied. The Chief of Police
may consult with and ask for a recommendation from any other City officer or department
prior to the issuance of any license under this Chapter, and shall, at the request of any City
officer or department, supply such officer or department with a copy of any such license or
application therefor.
9.10.100 License.
The license and each duplicate license shah contain the date of issuance, the date of
expiration, a designation of the type of license it is, the location or locations of the licensed
activity, the signature of the Chief of Police, and such other matters as are specified in this
Chapter and as the issuing officer deems appropriate.
9.10.110 Inspection.
Every applicant or licensee shall permit the Chief of Police access to any premises
used in the conduct of the licensed business at all reasonable times, and to any records
required to be maintained by this Chapter, and the Chief of Police shall make such
inspections thereof as he/she deems necessary from time to time.
9.10.120 Display of license.
Each licensee shall display his/her license or duplicate license in a prominent location
in each licensed place of business; and each licensee shall display his/her license to any
peace officer requesting to see it.
9.10.130 Multiple licenses; duplicat~ licenses.
Any person carrying on or conducting more than one of the businesses for which a
license is required under this Chapter shall obtain a license for each such business. Any
r:~ORD$\66 4
person can'ying on a licensed activity at more than one place of business shall obtain a
duplicate license for each place of business.
9.10.140 Licenses not transferable.
No license issued under the terms of this Chapter shall be transferable, and no such
license shall be displayed or used in conjunction with any activity other than the licensed
business or by any person other than the licensee or Ms/her employee, nor at any location
other than that indicated on the license and application.
9.10.150 Temporary permits.
The Chief of Police may, in his/her discretion, upon the filing of an application for a
license pursuant to this Chapter, issue one temporary permit to conduct the business
described in the application for a period not to exceed sixty (60) days, if he/she finds that the
inability to carry on such business because of the lack of a license would cause hardship to
the applicant.
9.10.160 Revocation.
When the Chief of Police has issued any license under the tens of this Chapter, the
same may be revoked at any time thereafter by the Chief of Police ff he/she finds that:
A. The conduct of the licensed business does not or will not comport with the
public welfare;
B. The business has been conducted in an illegal, improper, or disorderly
manner, or in an manner substantially different from that described in the application; or,
C. The business is being operated in a manner for which the license application
could have been denied.
9.10.170 Appeals.
A. Any person may appeal to the City Council the decision of the Chief of Police
to deny an application for a license or a temporary permit, or to revoke a license. Said
appeal shall be made by verified, written declaration to the City Council, received by the
City Clerk within thirty (30) days of the Chief of Police's action. The City Council shall
hold a hearing on such appeal. Notice of the time, date, and place of said hearing shall be
mailed to the licensee or applicant at the address. given in the license application at least ten
(10) days prior to the date of said hearing. For the purlx3se of said hearing, the City Council
may appoint any qualified hearing officer to take evidence offered by the applicant and the
Chief of Police concerning the denial or revocation and summarize the evidence presented
r:\ORDS\66 5
and report his/her findings and recommendations based on such evidence to the Council, or
the Council may itself take such evidence.
B. The following rules of evidence shall apply at the hearing:
1. Oral evidence shall be ~ only on oath or Rffn'mation.
2. Each party shah have these rights: To call and examine wimesses, to
introduce exhibits, to cross-examine opposing witnesses covered in the direct examination, to
impeach any witnesses regardless of which pat~ first called him/her to testify, and rebut the
evidence against him/her. ff the appellant does not testify, in his/her own behalf, he/she may
be called and examined as ff under cross-examination.
3. The hearing need not be conducted according to technical roles relating
to evidence and wimesses. Any relevant evidence shall be admitted if it is the son of
evidence on which responsible persons are accustomed to rely in the conduct of serious
affairs, regardless of the existence of any common law or statutory rule which might make
improper the admission of such evidence over objection in civil actions. Hearsay evidence
may be used for the purpose of supplementing or explaining any direct evidence but shall not
be sufficient in itself to support a finding unless it would be admissible over objection in civil
actions. The roles of privilege shall be effective to the same extent that they are now or
hereafter may be recognized in civil actions, and irrelevant and unduly repetitious evidence
shall be excluded.
C. The Mayor shall, at the request of the Chief of Police or the appellant, or their
attorneys, issue subpoenas or subpoenas duces teeurn to compel the attendance of witnesses
and evidence at said hearing.
D. The City Council shall determine, on all the evidence presented to it, or on the
summary of evidence and findings of fact and recommendations of the person holding the
hearing, whether said license or permit should be issued, or whether such revoked license
should be reinstated and shall direct the Chief of' Police to act accordingly.
9.10.180
Regulations: Hours of dance hall. bars and ni~,ht clubs.
It shall be unlawful for any person, association, or corporation to operate, participate
in, or assist in operation of dance hall, bar, or night club between the hours of 2:00 a.m. and
6:00 a.m. of any day:
9.10.190 Regulations: Disorderly conduct.
It shall be unlawful for any person in charge of or assisting in the conducting of any
dance hall, bar, or night club to permit any intoxicated, boisterous, or disorderly person to
enter, be or remain in, or to assist in any dance hall, bar, or night club, and it shall be
r:\ORDS\66 6 "
unlawful for any person in an intoxicated condition to enter or remain in any dance hall, bar,
or night club for any reason to conduct himserf/herself in a boisterous or disorderly manner
in such dance tiall, bar, or~ght club.
9.10.200 Prohibited conduct.
Any person violating any provision of this Chapter shall be guilty of a misdemeanor
and be punished in accordance with Sections 1.20.010 and 1.20.030 A of this Code.
Revocation or suspension of a license issued under this Chapter shall not be a defense against
prosecution.
9.10.210 Applicability of regulations to existing business.
The provisions of this Chapter shall be applicable to all persons and businesses
described herein whether the herein described activities were established before or after the
effective dates of the ordinance enacting this Chapter into law. All such persons and
businesses shall have ninety (90) days from said effective date to comply with the provisions
of this Chapter."
Section 3. SEVERABILITY The City Council hereby declares that the provisions
of this Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall
hold any sentence, paragraph, or section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall
not affect the validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance.
Section 4. NOTICE OF ADOPTION. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption
of this ordinance and shall cause the same to be posted as required by law.
Section 5. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect
thirty (30) days after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this
Ordinance and cause copies of this ordinance to be posted in three designated posting places.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this
__ day of , 1994.'
ATTEST:
Ron Roberts, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL}]
r:\ORD$%66 7
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE)
CITY OF T~v/IECULA) .....
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Ordinance No. __ was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a
regular meeting of the City Council on the day of , 1994, and that
thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City
Council on the day of 199_, by the following vote, to wit:
CO~C~~ERS:
NOES:
COUNCIL1WEMBERS:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
r:\ORDSX66 8
ITEM
25
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPRO~,~
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning
June 14, 1994
Extension of Time for Variance No. 10 - a Fifty-Five (55) Foot High Freeway
Oriented Sign for Creekside Texaco
Prepared By: Matthew Fagan, Assistant Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
Provide Direction to Staff Regarding Variance No. 10
BACKGROUND
The applicant filed an application on February 18, 1992 for a variance to allow a 10' increase
in the maximum permitted height of a freeway oriented sign. Variance No. 10 was originally
denied by the Planning Commission at their April 20, 1992 meeting. The request was for a
fi.fty-five foot high sign. The applicant appealed this decision to the City Council through
Appeal No. 25. The City Council upheld Appeal No. 25 and overturned the Planning
Commission denial of Variance No. 10 at their June 9, 1992 meeting. The Variance was
approved, subject to the following condition of approval: "The applicant agrees to enter into
an agreement stipulating that if at the end of a two year period, the City Council does not
grant an extension to this variance, the sign will automatically be reduced to a height of 45
feet at the owners expense." The two year period expires on June 9, 1994.
The applicant submitted a letter to Staff dated May 11, 1994 (reference Attachment No. 1 )
requesting an extensioi~ of the variance "in order for his business to remain viable." Staff met
with the applicant because of differences in interpreting the original City Council approval of
Variance No. 10. An agreement that the applicant executed (see Attachment No. 2 for
memorandum of agreement) stated that he waived his rights for an extension of time for the
project. However, this stipulation of the agreement appears to conflict with the Conditions
of Approval stated 'previously. The condition implies that the Council could consider an
extension of time, which appears to conflict with the agreement. Because of the ambiguity
relative to the extension issue, Staff decided that the Council needed to provide some direction
to staff.
R:\STAFFRPT\IOVAR.CC 5/31/94 kLb 1
Staff requests that the Council provide the direction with consideration of the options listed
below:
1. The Council may approve Variance No. 10 with no additional requirement for
extensions of time.
The Council may provide the extension to Variance No. 10 at this time with a specified
period of time.
The applicant may have to apply for an extension of time for Variance No. 10, which
would be heard by the Planning Commission and City Council.
The applicant will need to re-apply for :a new variance regarding this project, which
would be heard by the Planning Commission and City Council.
FISCAL IMPACT
NoRe.
Attachments:
1. Letter to Staff dated May 11, 1994- Page 3
2. Memorandum of Agreement - Page 4
R:\STAFFRPT\IOVAR.CC 5/31/9~ ktb 2
ATTACHMENT NO. I
LETTER TO STAFF DATED MAY 11, 1994
R:\STAFFRPT\10VAR.CC 5/31/g4 .ktb 3
May 11, 1994
ECI
3517 W. Common Wealth Ave.
Fullef~0~, CA 92633
MAY 11
CiTY OF IEMECUL.4
City of Temecula, Planning Department
ATTN: Mr. Gary Thornhill
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
Subject:
Creekside Texaco & Food Mart,
Variance Extension for sign
Dear Mr. Thornhill,.
The City Council approved variance #10 for a 55 foot high sign
subject to the following condition: "The applicant agrees to enter
into an agreement stipulating that if at the end of a two year
period, the City Council does not grant an extension to this
variance the sign will be reduced to a height of 45 feet"
i am requesting an extension of the variance in order for our
business to remain viable.
We have been quite fortunate to pump a large volume of fuel, which
we believe is due to our freeway visible signage. Because of our
volume, we receive a discount, which has been passed on to the
citizens cf Temecula. it has also allowed us to make enough money
to partlcipa=e in numerous local sponsorships and charitable
causes.
The cos= of fuel in Temecula is now lower than Sun City (even
though we pay more for fuel than they do). The reason I mention
Sun City, ls because many local residents use this as the location
for "Best price" fuel purchases.
Without the freeway visibility, we would pump much less fuel, which
would put us on par with neighborhood gas stations such as those in
Californian Oaks, a~ Costco Center and Target Center which are
usually .03 to .09 cents higher per gallon.
At present we are the highest volume Texaco West of the Mississippi
and ninth in the nation of which there are 14,000 Texaco stations.
With regard to further justification for continuing our variance,
we are at a much lower elevation (aprox 15') than the properties on
the east side of Front Street. .Common sense says that there should
be an elevation differenceadSustment based on this factor.
Please submit my request to the City Council.
/
Lau Kasilmere
Creel:side Texaco
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT
R:\STAFFRPT\IOVAR.CC 5/31/94 .klb 4
RECORDING REQUES~,D BY, AND
WHEN RECORDED, MAIL TO:
CITYOF~
43174 B'Usiness Park Drive,. _._
Temecuh~ California 92590
WITH A COPY TO:
(Space Above for Recorder's Use)
MEMORANDUM OF AGR.EEMt2V~
This Agreement is entered inW as of the 6th day of July, 1992, by and between ECI
CPropeny Owner') and the City of Temecula, a California municipal corporation (the *City*),
with reference to the following facts:
RECITALS
WHEREAS, Property Owner is the owner of real property located at 29115 Front Street
in the City of Temecula (the "Property") which is more particularly described in Exhibit "A" ,
attached hereto and made a part hereof; and
WHERF~AS, on June 17, 1991, the City Council approved Conditional Use Permit No.
5 for gasoline station use, authorizing Property Owner to develop the Property in accordance
therewith; and
WHEREAS, Property Owner desires to erect and/or maintain an on-site pole sign in
conjunction with the intended use of the Property; and
WltF~REAS, under the terms of Section 19.4(a) of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of
Temecula (which is .contained as Riverside County Ordinance No. 348, which the City adopted
pursuant to City Ord'm. ance No. 90-4), on-site pole signs within the City are restricted to a height
of 45 (45) feet or less; and
WHEREAS, Property Owner has requested that the City Council grant a Variance from
the terms of Section 19.3(a) to permit the erection and/or maintenance of an on-site pole sign
up to 55 feet in height (the 'Sign') and
S~FORMa~tlIIP. MORANDM.AGR
WH~zREAS, the C.,y Council granted the height Variance ,,o. 10 for a two year period,
terminating on June 9, 1994, to permit the Property Owner to establish his gasoline station
bus~ness;
~, Property.Owner acknowledges that he is erecting and/or maintain the Sign
at his own risk, and that the City is under no obligation to renew or extend the terms of the
Agreement, nor to extend the time limitations of the Variance;
NOW, T!:H~I~DRE, Property Owner and the City hereby agree as follows:
1. PURPOSE. The purpose of this Agreement is to assure (a) that Property Owner
is given a height Variance for a specified period of time from the terms of Section 19.4(a) with'
regard to the Sign, and Co) that Property Owner understands and acknowledges the terms and
limitations of the height Variance, and the consequences of failure to adhere to the terms of this
Agreement.
2. PROPERTY SUBJECT TO AGIzREMENT. The property which is the
subject of this Agreement is described in Paragraph A of the recitals above.
CITY PROCEEDINGS. Reference is made to Variance No. 10 approved by
the City Council, for the Property on June 17, 1991, copies of which are on file
at City Hall located at 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula, CA 92590.
4. TIME LIMITATIONS. The Variance granted for the Sign is until June 9,
1994 ("Termination Dam"). On or before the Termination Date, Property Owner will bring the
Sign into compliance with the terms of Section 19.4 of Ordinance No. 348 with regard to on-site
pole signs.
5. WAIVER OF RIGHTS. Property Owner willingly and knowingly waives any
and all rights he may have, now or in the future, including, but not limited to, constitutional and
statutory rights under Federal and State Law, to seek an extension of the Variance.
6. WORK DONE BY CITY. Property Owner agrees that, if he fails to lower the
sign by the Termination Date as set forth in this Agreement, the City shall give written notice,
as provided in Section 9(b) hereof, of the deficiency to Property Owner. Property Owner shall
have twenty (20) days after receipt of such notice to make the necessary correction. If the
correction is not made within such twenty' (20) day period, the City may elect to take the steps
necessary to remove the Sign from the Property. To do this, the City Shall serve a notice, as
provided in Section.gCo) hereof, of its, intent to enter the Property for this purpose. The City
shall give written notice, as provided in Section 9Co) hereof, at least fifteen (15) days in advance
of the date when it intends to enter the Property. For this purpose, the City may enter upon the
Property and perform such work as it, in its sole discretion, considers reasonably necessary and
proper to remove the sign. The City may, in 'its sole discretion, act either through its own
employees or through an independent contractor.
SWORM,qXMI]MORANDM.AGR
7. CONSTRL _lION COSTS AS LIEN. If the CA,y incurs any costs, including,
but not limited to, construction costs, administrative costs and attorneys' fees, including City
Attorneys' fees, in removing the Sign from the Property and/or forcing compliance with the
terms of Section 19.4, the City shall make demand upon Property Owner for payment. If
Property OWn. .~ fails to pay ~ costs incurred by the City within thirty (30) days of the date
demand is made, costs shall be a.~essed against the Property pursuant to Section 38773.5 of the
Government Code and shall be transmitted to the tax collector for collection.
8. NOTICE OF INTENT TO SI~JJ. OR LEASE. When Property Owner inumds
to sell or lease the property, he shall request the written consent of the City to allow the
subsequent grantee to assume the.obligations under this agreement. The City shall have the
right, in its sole discretion, of allowing the subsequent grantee to assume the obligations under
this Agreement or of entering the Property and removing the Sign from the Property. 'Upon
obtaining such written consent of the City, Property Owner shall file with the City a notice to
that effect containing the name and address of the new owner and a copy of the deed.
9. I~SCELLANEOUS PROVISION.
a. If any provision of this Agreement is adjudged invalid, the remaining provisions
shall not be affected.
b. Notice to Property Owner shall be considered to have been given after
mailing, registered or certified, return receipt requested, to Property Owner's last known
address, or as shown on the tax rolls.
c. This writing contains a full, final, and exclusive statement of the
Agreement of the parties.
d. If there is more than one (1) signer of this Agreement as Property Owner,
their obligations are joint and several.
e. The obligations upon Property Owner signing this Agreement terminate
as to it personally when it obtains the written consent of the City to convey its interest in the
Property and ~es for record with the County Recorder a copy of assignment of this Agreement.
In such a case the new owner takes title subject to the requirements of this Agreement.
f. The Property Owner appoints the City as its attorney-in-fact to do all acts
and things which the City considers necessary to bring the Sign and the Driveway into
compliance with the. terms of the Code.
g. ~o alteration, variation, or amendment of the terms of this Agreement
shall be valid unless made in writing and signed by the parties hereto, and no oral understanding
or agreement not incorporated herein shall be bi~ding on either of the parties hereW.
h. Property Owner shall not assign this Agreement without the prior written
consent of the City. Any attempt to assign without such consent shall be void and confer no
rights on any third party.
S~ORMS~iEMORAr~M,AOR
By: ~
Name: Youis K~.~hmere
Title: President
By:
Name:
Title:
CITY OF TEMECIIA,
Y "~~"~rnhi]]
Director of Planning
STATE OF CALIFO~
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
sS.
On July 13, 1992, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State,
personally appeared Louis Kashmere personally known to me or proved to me on the basis of
satisfactory evidence to be the person whose name is subscribed to within the instrument and
acknowledged to me that he executed the same in his authorized capacity.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Pubnc said State
" JUNE S. gREEK
· ~E COUNTY
NOvemlDer 18. 1994 ~,
S~FORMS~MEMORANDM.AGR
STATE OF CALrFORNI~
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
On JUl~ '13, 1992, t;et~;~e me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State,
personally appeared Gary Thornhill personally known to me or proved to me on the basis of
satisfactory evidence to be the person whose name is subscribed to within the instnnnent and
acknowledged to me that he executed the same in his authorized capacity.
WIFNESS my hand and official seal.
Notary publc-C, allfomto
My ~'nmlni~ F. xl~'m
November 18, 1994
S~PORM~MEMORANDM,AOR
ITEM NO. 26
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Manager/City Council
Mary Jane McLarney, Finance Officer
June 14, 1994
International Rectifier Owner Participation Agreement
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING AN OWNER
PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN
THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND INTERNATIONAL
RECTIFIER, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION
DISCUSSION: International Rectifier Corporation (IR) operates a high technology
semiconductor manufacturing plant in Temecula. The plant currently employs an average of
643 people and began operating in Temecula in 1985. IR was founded in 1947 and operates
additional manufacturing facilities in Tijuana, England, Italy and El Segundo, which is also their
headquarters.
IR currently produces 25% of the world market of MOSFET chips. Major customers include
Ford Motor Corp., Delco Electronics Corp., Hewlett-Packard Co., IBM, General Electric and
Matsushita Electronics Corp. Only 8% of the firm's gross sales relate to defense/aerospace
sales.
In order to position the company for the next major growth phase in the chip market and to
maintain their market share, IR has planned a major expansion of their fabrication unit. This
expansion will generate at least 150 new jobs at an average annual salary of $28,000. The
building improvements and equipment required for the expansion will cost $66 million. The
company has received multi-million dollar incentive offers from European countries. Because
the Temecula plant could be modified to accommodate this expansion, the site was included
in the company's site selection analysis.
Although the Federal and State governments are unable to provide any business incentives
comparable to the European nations, the City's Redevelopment Agency is able to reimburse
all or a portion of the incremental growth in property tax paid by IR after the Low-Mod housing
set-aside and "pass-through" payments to other governmental agencies. In order to compete
with the sites Overseas, the City has offered a reimbursement of 50% of such amount for ten
(1 O) years. The net increment to the City is estimated at $190,000 per year. Therefore, the
reimbursement would amount to $95,000 per year. In the event that the minimum 150 jobs
are not created the reimbursement will be adjusted based on the actual number of jobs
created. A!so,jn the first year-the City would reimburse up to $100,O00 of City development
fees from the new increment received.
In addition to the City's incentives, the County of Riverside recognizes the value of this
expansion and will issue a $25 million industrial development bond with a Section 108 HUD
guarantee to reduce the cost of financing the facility. In connection with the guarantee, the
City of Temecula and other cities participating in the County CDBG program will pledge their
CDBG funds in the event of default by IR. Further, the annual tax increment will be pledged
under the guarantee. The credit analysis for this portion of the transaction is being prepared
· by the County and the agreements for the guarantee will be provided to the City Council at
a later date.
FISCAL IMPACT: New RDA tax increment of $190,000 per year will be generated,
approximately $95,000 will be reimbursed to International Rectifier.
ATTACHMENT: Resolution No. 94---
RESOIAH~ON NO. 94 -
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING AN OWNER
PARTICIPATION AGI~~ BY AND BETWEEN
~ CITY OF TEMECULA AND INTERNATIONAL
RECIIFI ER, A CALII~I)RNIA CORPORATION
The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby determine, resolve, and order
as follows:
Section 1. Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby makes the
following findings:
A. International Recti~er (Owner) has proposed to construct an addition of 40,000
square feet to its existing building to be used for the manufacturing of semiconductors.
B. The total cost of the building and equipment for the new facility should not be
less than $66,000,000.00.
C. Once fully equipped and operating, the facility will create a total of 150 new,
full-time jobs consisting of 40 professional positions, 30 management positions and 80 skilled
labor positions. The avenge annual salary will be $28,000 beginning in 1995.
D. Construction and equipping of the Facility will result in an increase in the
assessed value of the Site of not less than $66,000,000.00. This will result in a Net Tax
Increment due the Temecula Redevelopmerit Agency, of not less than $190,000.00 per year.
E. Owner was offered financial grants and inducements from foreign countries
worth not less than $20,000,000.00 to locate the Facility outside the United States. In order
to induce Owner to develop the Facility in the United States, specifically in the County of
Riverside, City of Temecula, it is necessary that incentives be offered Owner at a Federal,
County and local level.
F. In order to induce Owner to locate the Facility in Temecula, the following
steps will be taken:
1. The County of Riverside will sell Industrial Development Bonds in the
mount of not less than $25,000,000.00, the proceeds of which will be loaned to Owner to
construct the Facility (hereinafter referred to as ihe "Bonds").
priority:
Security for the Bonds will be provided according to the following
a. Owner will provide reasonably appropriate security for the
Bonds, as determined purs_ua~_t__to a seIEr'ate agreement between the Owner and the County of
Riverside."
b. The County will use the Section 108 Loan Guarantee Program
of the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development to guarantee the Bonds.
c. The City will agree to pledge its annual allocation of CDBG
funds in its entirety to the County of Riverside in the event Owner is in default on the debt
service on the bonds, and until such time that such default is remedied. Such allocation of
CDBG funds shall be committal until all County CDBG funds ufli:,ai for debt service on
the Bonds are x~id.
d. The Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula (Agency)
and the County of Riverside will enter into an agreement transferring to the County property
tax increment from Site not previously obligated by the Agency. Such transfer shall begin
upon a default on Bonds and continue until such default is remedied and all CDBG funds
u'Ulized for debt service on the Bonds are repaid.
3. The Agency will reimburse Owner fifty percent (50%) of the Property
Tax Increment resulting from the proposed construction and equipping of an expansion to the
International Recti~er Facility located at 4 1915 Business Park Drive.
The reimbursement shall be exclusive of the pass through of tax-
increment revenue to local agencies and the set-aside for the low to moderate income housing
fund as required pursuant to Health and Safety Code Sections 33401 and 33334.2,
respectively. The period of the reimbursement of the property tax increment will be for ten
years, and is contingent upon the creation and maintenance of 150 new jobs. Failure to meet
this job quota will result in a reduction of this reimbursement.
4. The Agency will reimburse Owner all City land use, grading and
permit fees for approval of the Facility, up to a maximum of $100,000. This reimbursement
will be paid exclusively from the first year of the Property Tax Increment reimbursement set
forth in Section 3 above.
5. The City will 'expedite' all City building and permit applications.
Based upon thi above findings, the City of Temecula hereby approves the Owner
Participation Agreement by and between the Redevelopment Agency of the City of
Temecula, the City of Temecula and International Recti~er, a California Corporation.
PASSED, APPROV!~ AND ADOFrED, by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a __regular m.eet~n_g__on the 14th day of June 1994.
ATI~T:
June S. Greek
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE)ss
CITY OF TEMECULA)
Ronald H. Robert,s, Mayor
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify
that Resolution No. 94-__ was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 14th day of June, 1994, by the following
vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
COUNCILNIEM~ERS:
COLrNCILIVIEMBERS:
COUNCILlVm-MBERS:
COUNCILNfF~MBERS:
June S. Greek
City Clerk
ITEM NO.
27
CITY NANAGER , ~
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
City Manager/City Council
FROM:
Tim D. Sadat, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
DATE:
June 14, 1994
SUBJECT: '
Financing and Construction Agreement Regarding the Widening of
Margarita Road between Rancho California Road and La Serena Way
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council:
Approve the attached agreement with Margarita Village Retirement Community, Inc.
providing for the financing and construction of the east side of Margarita Road between
Rancho California Road and La Serena Way to ultimate width, and authorize the Mayor
to execute the attached agreement.
e
Appropriate $168,517in the Margarita Road Reimbursement District Fund Account No.
220-165-610-5804.
e
Approve a $168,517 advance from the Development Impact Fund to the Margarita
Road Reimbursement District Fund.
BACKGROUND:
Vesting Tract Map No. 23371, Amendment No. 1, was conditionally approved by the County
of Riverside to complete the widening of the east side of Margarita Road between Rancho
California and La Serena Way prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the first
residential unit. In an. effort to expedite the construction of this primary transportation link,
the City Council directed staff to negotiate with the owners of Vesting Tract Map No. 23371
for the installation of these street improvements at the earliest possible time. As a result of
this negotiation, in exchange for constructin~! Margarita Road immediately, the City of
Temecula will advance the cost of the construction to Margarita Village Retirement
Community, Inc., the owners of the property. The anticipated cost of construction, up to a
maximum amount of $168,516.13, will then be reimbursed to the City through a surcharge
of approximately $210.65 on the first 800 building permits issued within Tract No. 23371.
Funds will be disbursed to Margarita Village Retirement Community, Inc. based on
construction invoices and the final surcharge amount will be based on the final construction
cost.
r:\agdrpt~,94\0614%mwci .egrlejp
The project wi~ be constru~te'd as a typical subdivision improvement with the same bonding,
insurance and inspection requirements of all land development projects,
FISCAL IMPACT:
This project will require an appropriation in the Margarita Road Reimbursement District Fund
in the amount of $168,517and an advance from the Development Impact Fund for the same
amount. This new fund will enable the City to better track the reimbursements received for
this project.
Attachment: Murrieta Village Retirement Community, Inc. Agreement
r:\agdrpt~94~0614~mwci.agrlajp
Recording Requested By:
CITY OF TEMFL'ULA
When Recorded Remm To:
C1TY OF TEMECULA
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92~90
Attention: City Clerk
FINANCING AND CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT
REGARDING WIDENING OF MARGAR1TA ROAD
This Agreement is entered into as of this 14th day of June, 1994, by and between the
City of Temecula ("CITY") and Margarita Village Retirement Community Inc., ("MVRCI") a
California Corporation. This Agreement is entered into with respect to the following facts.
RECITALS
R-1 Margarita Vilhge Development Company, a California Limited Partnership
obtained approval of the following final and tentative tract maps:
(a)
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23371, Amendment No. 1, approved on
November 8, 1988, by the County of Riverside.
Co)
Phase 1 of Tract Map No. 23371, recorded on April 5, 1990, pursuant to
approval granted by the City of Temecula, on March 27, 1990.
Ro2 Through a foreclosure sale, the deed from which was recorded on October 26,
1993, MVRCI acquire~ the title to VTTM 233~/1, Amendment No. 1. MVRCI owns the
property as described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein (which real
property is hereinafter referred to as the "Property").
R-3 As of the date of this Agreement, Margarita Road is fifty-five (55) feet wide
(exclusive of curb, gutter and sidewalk) from La Serena Way to Rancho California Road, as
shown on Exhibit B, attached hereto.
R-4 V'Ff/V[ 23371, Amendment No. 1, is subject to condition that the ultimate road
improvements to Margarita Road be constructed from La Serena Way to Rancho California Road
(the "Margarita Road Widening"), .including curb, gutter, asphalt, base sidewalk, roadway
striping, public utilities and street lights as shown on the improvement plans and the attached
Exhibit "C".
1 r,~mluils~:lrv!~-Lslrlaj~
R-5 VTTM 23371, Amendment No. 1, requires that the Margarita Road Widening be
completed prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy for the first Residential Unit.
The parties adiowledge and agree that under VTTM 23371, Amendment No. 1, lVlVRCI has
no immediate obligation to construct the Margarita Road Widening.
R-6 The City Council of the City of Temecula fin& that there is an immediate need
to complete the Margarita Road Widening. Margarita Road exists as two (2) southbound and
one (1) northbound lanes wide from Rancho California Road to La Serena Way. This limited
width of roadway creates traffic congestion, inca'eased driving time, and increased air pollution.
Consequently, the City Council finds that advancing monies to MVRCI to advance construction
of the Margarita Road Widening serves the public health, safety and welfare.
AGI~EMENT
In consideration of the foregoing and the mutual promises and covenants contained
herein, the parties agree as follows:
1. MVRCI shall use reasonable diligence to cause the Margarita Road Widening to
be constructed as soon as is reasonably practicable.
2. MVRCI has full responsibility for securing all easements and right-of-ways for
the construction of the Margarita Road Widening.
3. MVRCI shall solicit three (3) bids for the construction of the Margarita Road
Widening. MVRCI shall award contracts for the Margarita Road Facilities. Copies of the bids
will be forwarded to the City Engineer. The Margarita Road Widening shall be constructed by
a contractor or contractors licensed by the State of California (the "Contractor'). The
Contractor shall be required to provide faithful performance, labor and materials bonds, and
warranty bonds as required for subdivision improvements. The Contractor shall name both the
City and MVRCI and their employees, officers, directors, agents and consultants thereof as
additional insureds under a comprehensive general liability insurance policy with coverage broad
enough to include contractual obligations'under such construction contract in an amount not less
than one million dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence. The bid and contract documents shall
include the bond and insurance requirements as set forth by mutual agreement between the City
and MVRCI at the time of advertising for bids, and said requirements shall not be less than
those stated above.
Prior to the aivard of any contract for the Margarita Road Widening, lVlVRCI shall
confirm that there are sufficient funds appropriated by the City Council to cover the award of
the bid for the Margarita Road Widening. No .award of a contract for the Margarita Road
Widening shall be made unless City funds ani appropriated to cover the contract award,
including a contingency amount equal to ten percent (10%) of the contract price and all costs
for inspecting said contract. Failure by the lVlVRCI to seem approval as to the availability of
funds prior to the award of a contract will result in the City not honoring any Payment Request
Forms submitted for said contract until the City can determine that funds are available.
Exhibit *D' provides an estimated budget for the construction of Margarita Road
Widening. This budget has been prepared by engineers retained by MVRCI, and City staff and
it is the responsibility of ~'Cl to function within the dollar amount set forth in Exhibit *D'.
4. MVRCI shall administer the construction contracts awarded for the lVlargarita
Road Widening. Inspection of the Margarita Road Widening during consU'uction shall be the
responsibility of the City. MVRCI shall pay all City permit and inspection fees. MVRCI shall
obtain soils inspections and submit soils reports as required for subdivision improvements.
5. No change order may be approved by MVRCI with regard to the Margarita Road
Widening without receiving confirmation from the City Engineer that there are sufficient
appropriated funds for such purposes. The MVRCI may approve change orders in a cumulative
total amount of three percent (3 % ) of the contract price of the Margarita Road Widening without
receiv'.mg prior confirmation from the City Engineer of the availability of funds.
6. MVRCI shall prepare and execute a Notice of Completion as to the Margarita
Road Widening, record said Notice with the Office of the Recorder of the County of Riverside,
State of California, and cause the Contractor and all subcontractors to provide lien and material
releases with respect thereto. MVRCI shall provide copies of each said Notice and all releases
to the City.
7. Upon completion of construction, lVlVRCI shall offer for dedication to the City
the Margarita Road Widening free and clear of all liens and encumbrances. The City shall
immediately accept and maintain the Margarita Road Widening. Ten percent (10%) warranty
bond shall remain in effect for twelve (12) months following acceptance of roadway.
8. City shall advance MVRCI its reasonable costs and expenses in connection with
the construction of the Margarita Road Widening up to a maximum of $168,516.13 (the
"Advance"). Upon monthly submission by lVlVRCI, of a Payment Request Form with
supporting invoices to the City, monies will be advanced to MVRCI in the amounts specified
to pay for the construction costs, inspection fees, encroachment fees and utility deposits actually
incurred and paid by MVRCI for the Margarita Road Widening. No money shall be advanced
to MVRCI for its administrative costs incurred in reviewing and approving the plans,
specifications and bid documents. City shall advance monies within fifteen (15) days of receipt
of a valid Payment Request Form.
9. City shall impose, and MVRCI agrees to the imposition of, an additional building
permit fee of approximately $210.65 per residential dwelling unit within the Property (the
"Fee"). The Final Fee will be computed by dividing the actual cost advance by the first 800
residential building permits within the Property as of the date of this Agreement. Said Fee shall
be imposed against first 800 residential building pi,'rmits within the Property described on Exhibit
"A' and the payment on 800 units shall fully repay the advance. Said fee shall not be imposed
against use or occupancy of the golf course facilities.
10. Until the roadway is accepted MVRCI shall assume the defense' of, indemnify,
and hold harmless the City and its respective officers, employees, agents, and consultants, and
each and every one of them, from and against all actions, damages, claims, losses and expenses
of every type and description to which they may be subjected or placed, by reason of, or
resulting from, (i) the actions of MVRCI pursuant to this Agreement and (ii) the design and
conslxuction of the Margaxita Road Widening as shown on Exhibit *C* ; provided that nothing
in this paragraph shall limit, in any manner, the City's rights against any of MVRCI's
contractors, architects or engineers. No provision of this Agreement shall in any way limit the
extent of the responsibility of MVRCI for payment of damages resulting from its own
operations, including but not limited to design liability for Margarita Road Widening, or the
operations of any of its contractors, agents or employees.
The City shall assume the defense of, protect, indemnify, and hold harmless MVRCI and
its resp~tive officers, employees, agents, and consultants and each and every one of them, from
and against all actions, damages, claims, losses, liabilities and expenses of every type and
description to which they may be subjected or placed, by reason of, or resulting from, the
actions of the City taken in the performance Of this Agreement. This indemnification shall
expire upon acceptance of roadway improvements for maintenance by the City. No provision
of this Agreement shall in any way limit the extent of the responsibility of the City for the
payment of damages resulting from its own operations or the operations of any of its contractors,
agents or employees.
11. Any notice given hereunder shall be deemed effective (i) on receipt by received
personal delivery; (ii) one business day after being sent by a recognized overnight mail delivery
service; or Ctii) two business days after being deposited in the U.S. mail, first class postage
prepared, certified, remm receipt requested. Notices shall be sent addressed as follows:
City:
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California 92590
Attention: City Clerk
MVRCI:
Margarita Village Retirement Community, Inc.
c/o Kemper Real Estate Development Company
27555 Ynez Road, Suite 200
Temecula, California 92591
Attention: Dennis Chiniaeff
Any party may change its address for Receipt of Notice by giving written notice to all other
parties.
12. This Agreement and any amendment shall be recorded with the County Recorder
of Riverside County. All parties or their successors in interest agreed to execute a termination
of this Agreement in recordable form upon the completion of the obligations of MVRCI
hereunder. Upon completion of construction 'both parties agree to execute a Notice of
Completion and record it with the County Recorder.
13. This Agreement sets forth and contains the entire understanding and agreement
of the parties, and there are no oral or written representations, understandings, or ancillary
covenants, undertakings or agreements which are not contained or expressly referred to herein.
14. This Agreement and any dispute arising hereunder shall be governed and
interpreted in accordance with the laws of the Stat~ of California. This Agreement shall be
construed as 'a' whole ac~rd~g to its fair language and common meaning to achieve the
objectives and purpose~ of the partes hexeto. The nile of construction to the effect that
ambiguities are to be resolved against the drafting party shall not be employed in interpreting
this Agreement, all parties having been represented by counsel in the negotiation and preparation
hereof.
15. The burdens of this Agreement shall be binding upon, and the benefits of this
Agreement shall inure to, all successors in interest to the parties to this Agreement. All
provisions of this Agreement shall be enforceable as equitable servitude and constitutes covenants
running with the land.
16. This Agreement my be executed by the parties in counterparts, which
counterparts shall be construed together and have the same effect as if all of the parties had
executed the same instrument.
17. For purposes of sales of improved lots to consumerS, this Agreement, if recorded,
shall be deemed terminated as to individual lots upon the issuance of a building permit by City
for a structure on said lot.
19. Should it become necessary for any party to bring legal action to enforce any
provision of this Agreement, then the prevailing party in such action shall be entitled to recover
all attomey's fees and court costs reasonably incurred thereby.
IN WITNESS THEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day
and year set first forth above.
CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Ron Roberts, Mayor
Peter Thorson, City Attorney
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
MARGARITA VILLAGE
RETI~PM~-NT CO~, INC.
By:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE)
On before me, the undersigned, A Notary Public in and for the State of
California, personally appeared , personally known to me (or
proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are
subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same
in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signatures(s) on the instrument
the person(s), or entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Signature
PLEASE ACKNOWLEDGE BEFORE A NOTARY PUBLIC
EXHIBrF
Those parcels within the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California,
described as follows:
Parcels I through 5 inclusive of Parcel Map 21884, County of Riverside, State of California,
as per map recorded in Book 144, pages 23 through 33 inclusive of Parcel Maps, and
re-recorded as Amended Parcel Map 21884 recorded in Book 152, pages 22 through 31
inclusive of Parcel Maps, both in the Office of the County Recorder of said County.
Said Parcels 1, 3, and 5 have been re-subdivided in part as follows:
Tract 23371-1 Recorded April 5, 1990 in MB 216, Pages 8-18 Incl.
Tract 23371-2
Tract 23371-3
Tract 23371-4
Tract 23371-5
Recorded June 11, 1990 in MB 219, Pages 18-25 Incl.
Recorded August 7, 1990 in MB 222, Pages 99-113 Incl.
Recorded August 7, 1990 in MB 223, Pages 1-9 lncl.
Recorded September 10, 1990 in MB 224, Pages 50-56 Incl.
The land described in this legal description therefore includes all of Parcels 2 and 4, the
residual portions of Parcels 1, 3, and 5 (all in Amended Parcel Map 21884); and those
portions of Parcels 1, 3, and 5 recorded as Tracts 23371-1 through 5 inclusive.
3470 ~. D~, ITE ~A-lO0
~-~ (heroin calied t~ee), and ~he Gran~ee heroinafter ~d. . i ' :
I
~ x s o~ 'E- . o ~ ~ k ~X' ' j"":~:"'~
.' Sd!d deed of t~st des:ribes the following:
~. ~ermaa, the ab~e n~ed t~stor did, by the that deed referred to above, grant ~d r
co~,ey ~o the ~ntae n~ed ~harei.n, ~s property heretofore descr ed ~o sacura,
u~ o*~my obli a~io~, pa~n~ of a no:s or note- wl~ ln~rms~ accordin~
- ~srms ~rso[ an~ ~ara.~c, the holdtr of said no~e did execute and deliver C ~aa ~'r~ -
.~ w1~sn daclmrx~i~n of de~qult and demand for sale and ~o~ics o~ default and election ,
to cause ~be ~arsi ad to sell said proper~ ~hich no~ica was
of th* recorder of Riverside coyly;
.] ~ereaf~er, a No=ice af Tme~ej*l--Sals, s~etins thee lard Tms~ee would ~,11
described prepstry at public auction ~e~he hlZhsst bidder for cash on ' :' .
Oo"ob "20 $=~3 at t · Main Street entrance to the Count~ Courthouse, 4O~O "
1.. , , ..-
':..
: ~J .w. -- ~ ·; *~,T ' '~'~'"~ ~ · ~ ' ' '
. : . ~IBIT 'A"
..
05/11/94 07:42 FAX 714 609 0805 FATC0 TEMECULA ~003
~, ~ V ' b a before ~ ~te or solo ~horeLe
~ :~' ~ a~ ~oee ~o ~ra oncLCXed ~o gpecLa~ No~ice of said gale ps In said section ', ~ .
,~, '~.-- pr~tbd; and ' '. ' · ' .
~ ';:' · ~ereas, m1% appXteable sta~ pr~tsi~s d the s~mte of Caltfo~ia mud mIX o~
'.
' ~ ... In ~i~ness ~ereof, ~hm ~ders~Bned ca~d its corporm~m ~me m~ seal ~o be herea~t6
' ~N HERKEL, ASSIST~ SECRETARY
C~ OF
pe~lo~ty appoare~ ~E~ IM~EGE~ & F~EN ~E~EL
"'
' ~',~'~ ....
EXHIBIT
EXHIBIT 'D*
Margarita Rbad ImproVements Between Rancho California Road and La Serena Way
ITEM OF WORK F_,STIMAT~,n
COSTS
Construction Staking
Soils Engineering
Street Improvements (Curb & Gutter, Paving,. Sidewalk, Drive, Etc.)
Street Light Trenching, Etc.
Southern California Edison Deposits
$ 4,900.00
SUBTOTAL
1095 CONTINGENCY
PERMIT/INSPECTION FEES
TOTAL
11,000.00
108,095.21
13,246.00
9,902.54
147,143.75
14,714.38
6,658.00
168,516.13
7
ITEM 28
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER ~
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council
Mayor Ron Roberrs and Councilmember Sal Mu~oz
June 14, 1994
City Manager's Contract
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the' City Council approve the City Manager's employment
contract and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the agreement.
STAFF REPORT:
On May 24, 1994 the City Council offered the position of City Manager for the City
of Temecula to Ronald E. Bradley. Mr. Bradley has accepted the position at a current
salary of $103,860.
In addition, a City Council negotiating committee, comprised of Mayor Roberts and
Councilmember Mu~oz, negotiated the terms of Mr. Bradley's employment contract.
The results of these negotiations are contained in the attached contract, which is
presented for your review and consideration.
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of __, 1994, by and
between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City,"
and Ronald E. Bradley, an individual, hereinafter referred to as "Employee."
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, it is the desire of the City Council of City to retain the services of
Employee as City Manager; and
WHEREAS, it is the desire of the City Council of City to provide certain benefits,
establish certain conditions of employment, and to set certain working conditions of
Employee; and
WHEREAS, it is the desire of the City Council of City to: (1) provide inducement for
Employee to remain in City's employment; (2) make possible full work productivity by
assuring Employee's morale and peace of mind with respect to future security; and (3)
provide an equitable means for terminating Employee's services;
NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual promises, covenants, and
conditions contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows:
1. DUTIES:
City hereby agrees to employ Employee as City Manager of the City of
Temecula to perform the functions and duties specified in the Municipal Code, and to
perform other legally permissible and proper duties and functions as the City Council shall
from time to time assign.
2. TERM:
A. Employee is an at-will employee serving at the pleasure of the City
Council subject to the terms of this Agreement. Nothing in this Agreement shall prevent,
limit or otherwise interfere with the right of the City Council to terminate the services of
Employee at any time, for any lawful reason, subject only to the provisions set forth in
Section 3, paragraphs A and B of this Agreement. Termination shall require a three-fifths
(3/5) vote of the City Council.
B. Nothing in this Agreement shall prevent, limit or otherwise interfere
with the right of the City Manager to resign at any time from his position with City, subject
only to the provisions set forth in Section 3, paragraph C of this Agreement.
C. Notwithstanding the above, it is also understood and agreed that the
Employee shall be retained a minimum of six (6) months following any municipal election,
thereby allowing the new City Council adequate time to assess the Employee's
performance. If Employee is to be terminated at the end of the six (6) month period
following an election, the provisions of Section 3, paragraph A shall apply effective at the
end of the six (6) month period.
D. This Agreement shall remain in effect until terminated by either party
in the manner hereinafter provided. Employee agrees to remain in the exclusive
employment of City for a minimum period to and including July 1, 1997, and shall not
accept other employment nor to become employed by any other employer prior to that date
except as provided in Section 3, paragraph C of this Agreement.
Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions, Employee shall be permitted to
instruct, write, teach, and lecture on Employee's time off.
3. TERMINATION AND SEVERANCE PAY:
A. City shall give six (6) months' prior written notice of termination to
Employee.
B. In the event Employee is terminated by City, City agrees' to pay
Employee a terminating cash payment equal to six (6) months of Employee's base monthly
2
salary. In the event Employee is terminated because of his conviction of a felony or the
filing of criminal charge against him alleging a felony which subsequently results in his
conviction of a felony (including a plea of nolo contendere thereto), then, in that event,
City shall not be obligated to pay the terminating cash payment designated in this
paragraph. If Employee is terminated by City following the filing of such charges, and
pending a final judgment thereon 'or disposition thereof, City shall deposit said severance
pay in an interest bearing trust account in a bank doing business in the City of Temecula.
Said terminating cash payment including interest, if any, shall be considered part of
Employee's termination pay and may be taken by Employee, at his option, (1) upon the
date of termination, (2) as a lump sum on January I of the year following termination, or
(3) in a number of equal monthly payments not to exceed the number of months provided
in Paragraph A above beginning on the date of termination. City agrees to keep in full
force and effect and pay premiums of all of Employee's health and life insurance plans until
all termination payments are made.
C. In the event Employee voluntarily resigns his position as City
Manager, he shall give City at least sixty (60) days' prior written notice of his intention to
resign. Employee may solicit other employment at any time after giving or receiving
written notice of termination or after July 1, 1997.
D. In the event City, at any time during the term of this Agreement,
reduces Employee's salary or any other financial benefits in a greater percentage than an
applicable a cross-the-board reduction for executive management employees of City, or
fails to increase Employee's salary or any other, financial benefits consistent with increases
granted executive management employees, or in the event City refuses, following written
notice, to comply with any other provision benefiting Employee herein, or Employee resigns
following a suggestion, whether formal or informal, by the City Council that he resign,
3
then, in that event, Employee may, at his option, be deemed to be "terminated" effective
as of the date of such resignation or reduction.
4. SALARY:
City agrees to pay Employee a base salary of ~103,870.00as set forth in
the City salary resolution, salary additives, and benefits for his services rendered pursuant.
hereto in installments at the same time as other employees of the City are paid.
In addition, City agrees to increase Employee's base salary and/or other
benefits in such amounts and to such extent as the City Council may determine desirable
on the basis of an annual salary review of the City Manager made at the same time as
similar consideration is given other executive management employees generally.
5. PERFORMANCE EVALUATION:
A. The City Council shall review and evaluate the performance of
Employee annually, after adoption of the annual operating budget. Said review and
evaluation shall be in accordance with specific criteria developed jointly by the City Council
and Employee. Said criteria may be added to or deleted from as the City Council may from
time to time determine after consultation with Employee. The Mayor shall provide
Employee with a summary written statement of the findings of the City Council and
provide an adequate opportunity for Employee to discuss his evaluation with the City
Council.
B. Annually, the City Council and Employee shall define such goals and
performance objectives which they determine necessary for the proper operation of City,
and in the attainment of the City Council's poli.cy objectives and shall further establish a
relative priority among those various goals and objectives, said goals and objectives to be
reduced to writing. They shall generally be attainable within the time limitations as
specified and the annual operating and capital budgets and appropriations provided.
4
6. HOURS OF WORK:
It is recognized that Employee must devote a great deal of time outside the
normal office hours to business of City and, to that end, he shall be allowed to take
compensatory time off as he shall deem appropriate during said normal office hours.
7. AUTOMOBILE:
Employee's duties require that he shall have the exclusive and unrestricted
use of an automobile at all times during his employment with City. City shall be
responsible for paying for all liability, property damage and comprehensive insurance and
for the purchase, operation, maintenance, repair and regular replacement of said
automobile. Employee shall be allowed unrestricted personal and professional use of said
automobile, not including vacations.
8. SICK LEAVE, HOLIDAYS, VACATION, LEAVE WITHOUT PAY,
BEREAVEMENT LEAVE, AND ADMINISTRATIVE LEAVE:
A. Employee shall be credited with one hundred thirty-two (132) hours of
combined sick and vacation leave effective May 28, 1994.
B. Employee shall be entitled to accrue, and have credited to his
personal account, vacation and sick leave at the same rate as executive management
employees of City with ten (10) plus years seniority.
C. Employee shall be entitled to holidays, leave without pay, and
bereavement leave on the same basis as executive management employees of City.
D. Employee will be credited with eighty (80) hours of administrative
leave on July I st of each year. Unused administrative leave balances may be paid in cash
semi-annually in June and December at Employee's option.
9. DISABILITY, HEALTH AND LIFE INSURANCE:
City agrees to provide Employee and his dependents with, and make required
payments for, all insured and city-funded benefits provided to current executive
management employees, including, but not limited to life, accident, medical, and disability
plans. Employee agrees to make payments for these benefits in the same amounts as
executive management employees.
10. ANNUAL PHYSICAL:
City agrees to provide, at City expense, an annual physical to Employee by a
physician of his choice. Said physical shall be at least as extensive as that required of
executive management employees. Employee agrees to share results of said physical
examination with the City Council at their request.
11. RETIREMENT, DEFERRED COMPENSATION, AND MANAGEMENT PACKAGE:
A. City agrees that Employee shall be granted the same "management
package" as that offered to City's executive management employees.
B. City agrees to contribute all of the City's and Employee's shares to
maintain employee as a member of the Public Employees' Retirement System.
C. City shall deduct $312.50 from Employee's salary for each pay period
for Employee's contribution to a deferred compensation plan of his choice, pursuant to
Government Code Section 19993.
D. The City and Employee acknowledge the desirability of employee's
relocation to the City of Temecula. In order to secure Employee's relocation, the City will
reimburse Employee for moving and relocation .expenses in an amount not to exceed
$4,000. Such costs include, but are not limited to, real estate fees, escrow fees, title
insurance, and moving company fees. In addition, City will reimburse employee for loan
fees or "points" necessary for employee to secure 8 conventional home loan from 8
commercial lender for a seven percent (7%) thirty (30) year home loan.
E. City agrees to pay employee a salary additive of seven and 22/100
percent (7.22%) of his base salary. Such payment shall be earned biweekly beginning May
28, 1994 and paid annually to Employee on the first pay period in January, beginning in
January 1995.
12. OFFICIAL AND PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EXPENSES:
A. City agrees to budget and to pay for the professional dues and
subscriptions of Employee necessary for his continuation and full participation in national,
regional, state, and local associations and organizations necessary and desirable for his
continued professional participation, growth and advancement, and for the good of City.
B. City agrees to budget and to pay for the travel and subsistence
expenses of Employee for professional and official travel, meetings, and occasions
adequate to continue the professional development of Employee and to adequately pursue
necessary official and other functions for City, including, but not limited to the Annual
Conference of the International City/County Management Association (ICMA), the League
of California Cities, and such other national, regional, state, and local government groups
and committees thereof which employee serves as a member.
Co City agrees to budget and to pay for the travel and subsistence
expenses of Employee for short courses, institutes, and seminars that are necessary for his
professional development and for the good of City.
13. INDEMNIFICATION:
City shall defend, hold harmless, and indemnify Employee against any tort,
professional liability claim or demand or other legal action, whether groundless or
otherwise, arising out of an alleged act or omission occurring in the performance of
7
Employee's duties in accordance with the provisions of California Government Code 825.
City may compromise and settle any such claim or suit and pay the amount of any
settlement or judgment rendered therefrom.
14. BONDING:
City shall bear the full cost of any fidelity or other bonds required of
Employee under any law or ordinance.
15. OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF EMPLOYMENT:
A. The City Council, in consultation with Employee, shall fix any such
other terms and conditions of employment, as it may determine from time to time, relating
to the performance of Employee, provided such terms and conditions are not inconsistent
with or in conflict with the provisions of this Agreement, the Municipal Code, or any other
law.
B. All provisions of the Municipal Code, and regulations and rules of City
relating to vacation and sick leave, retirement and pension system contributions, holidays,
and other fringe benefits and working conditions as they now exist of hereafter may be
amended, also shall apply to Employee as they would to executive management employees
of City in addition to said benefits enumerated specifically for the benefit of Employee
except as herein provided.
C. Such other benefits as the City Council may authorize in the future
will be amended to this Agreement.
16. NO REDUCTION OF BENEFITS:
City shall not at any time during .the term of this Agreement reduce the base
salary, compensation, or other financial benefits of Employee, except to the degree of such
a reduction across-the-board for all executive management employees of City without
subjecting such action to be deemed a termination at Employee's option.
8
17. NOTICES:
Any notice required or permitted by this Agreement shall be in writing and
shall be personally served or shall be sufficiently given and deemed served upon the other
party if sent by United States Postal Service, postage prepaid, and addressed as follows:
TO CITY:
TO EMPLOYEE:
City Clerk
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
Ronald E. Bradley
City of Temecula
43174 BusineSs Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
Notices shall be deemed given as of the date of personal service or upon the date of
deposit in the course of transmission with the United States Postal Service.
18.
parties.
GENERAL PROVISIONS:
A. The text herein shall constitute the entire Agreement between the
B. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the
heirs at law and executors of Employee with respect to salary benefits or other payments
due employee at the time of death.
C. This Agreement shall become effective upon execution; provided,
however, that all financial provisions shall be retroactive to May 28, 1994.
D. Employee acknowledges that he has had the opportunity and has
conducted an independent review of the financial and legal effects of this Agreement.
Employee acknowledges that he has made an i,ndependent judgment upon the financial and
legal effects of this Agreement and has not relied upon any representations of the City, its
officers, agents, or employees other than those expressly set forth herein.
9
E. If any provision, or any portion thereof, contained in this agreement is
held unconstitutional, invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this Agreement, or portion
thereof, shall be deemed severable, shall not be affected and shall remain in full force and
effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City has caused this Agreement to be signed and
duly executed on its behalf by its Mayor, and duly attested by its City Clerk, and
Employee has signed and executed this Agreement, in triplicate, the day and year first
above written.
CITY OF TEMECULA, a municipal corporation
By
ATTEST:
Mayor
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Ronald E. Bradley
Employee
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
Dated
10
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council
Mayor Roberrs and Councilmember Mu~oz
June 14, 1994
City Manager's Contract
PREPARED BY: City Clerk June S. Greek
RECOMMENDATION: Approve the City Manager's employment contract and authorize
the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the agreement.
BACKGROUND: The staff will' finalize a staff report on this item and forward it to
you under separate cover.
JSG
ITEM
29
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY
ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICE
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
June 14, 1994
Ordinance 94- Restricting Trucks Over Six Thousand (6,000)
Pounds on Rainbow Canyon Road from Pala Road to the Southern City
Limit
PREPARED BY:
Martin C. Lauber, Traffic Engineer
RECOMMENDATION: The Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommends to that the City
Council introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE 94-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, AMENDING CHAPTER 10.20 OF THE TEMECULA
MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADD WEIGHT LIMITS ON DESIGNATED
STREETS
BACKGROUND:
The Traffic Division of the Public Works Department has been requested by residents and the
Public/Traffic Safety Commission to investigate limiting truck traffic on Rainbow Canyon Road.
Rainbow Canyon Road is currently a two (2) lane road, oriented north/south, connecting
southern Temecula to San Diego County through a portion of Riverside County just east of
Interstate 15 (I-15). It currently carries approximately 2,000 vehicles per day with
approximately 259 trucks each week. This road is designated as a secondary four (4) lane
road with a forecast'of 15,000 vehicles per day.
The unimproved southern portion of Rainbow Canyon Road within Temecula, traverses rugged
terrain comprised of sharp vertical and horizont.al curves and steep grades. This creates a
potential hazard for over-weight trucks using this route to by-pass the California Highway
Patrol truck scales located on I-15.
The improved northern portion traverses a residential area with single family homes which
have driveways directly accessing Rainbow Canyon Road..Due to limited front yard setbacks
each driveway has insufficient turn-a-round space, requiring residence to either back in or back
out of their driveways.
r:%egdrpt\94%0614%rei nboW .ordlajp
The Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommends posting Rainbow Canyon Road to restrict
trucks over 6,000 pounds. San Diego and Riverside County have supported our efforts by
agreeing to allow us to posraclvance warning signs identifying the restriction in their counties.
The California Highway Patrol {CHP) also commends our effort to restrict through traffic to
passenger vehicles only to reduce over-weight trucks using this route to by-pass the CHP
truck scales on Interstate 15. All trucks conducting business along Rainbow Canyon Road will
still be able to use this route since no alternative routes are available.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Funds are available in the Public Works Sign Account No, 100-164-999-5244
4 - Special Weight Limit Signs at approximately $500 each -- $2,000
2 - No Truck Over Three (3) Tons sign at $125 = 250
TOTAL ~,250
ATTACHMENTS:
Ordinance 94-
Exhibit "A" - Truck Restriction Signing Layout
Public/Traffic Safety Commission Minutes of March 24, 1994
r:\agdrpt\94\0614\rainbow:ord/ajp
ORDINANCE 94-
"AN ORDINiM~CE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY
OF TEVIECIILA, AMENDING CHAPTER 10.20 OF THE
~ MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADD WEIGHT IiMITS
ON DESIGNATED STI~ETS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN
AS FOLLOWS:
WFIEREAS, The Public/Traffic Safety Commission of the City of Temecula has
reviewed certain weight restrictions and forwarded their recommendations for changes to the
City Council;
SECTION 1. Section 10.20.070 of Chapter 10, Article II of the Temecula Municipal
Code, is hereby amended to read as follows:
ARTICLE II WEIGHT LIMITS
Section:
10.20.070 Designation
10.20.070 Designation.
When signs are erected giving notice thereof, the following streets or portions of streets
are restricted to vehicles not exceeding a maximum gross weight of 6,000 pounds:
A. Calle Medusa, from La Serena to Nicolas Road
B. Rainbow Canyon Road from Pala Road to the southern City limit
SECTION 2. Severability. The City Couch hereby declares that the provisions of this
Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any
sentence, paragraph, or section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the
validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance.
SECTION 3'- Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effective thirty
(30) days after its p~sage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and
cause copies of this Ordinance to be posted in three designated posting places.
SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance and certified
copy of the full text of this Ordinance shall be posted in the office of the City Clerk at least five
days prior to the adoption of this Ordinance. Within 15 days from adoption of this Ordinance,
the City Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance, together with the names of the
Councilmembers voting for and against the Ordinance, and post the same in the office of the
City Clerk.
r:\agdrpt\94\0614\rainbow.ordlajp
PASSI~T}, APPROVI~ AND ADOPTED, this
1994
Ron Roberrs, Mayor
ATTEST:
lune S. Greek, City Clerk
r:\agdrpt~94~0614~,rainbow.ordlajp
SR-79 (S)
TEMECULA
RIVERSIDE
C
H
P
VEIGH STATION
~"'RIVERSIIDE
SANXDIEGO
~ C
9/'j/94
COMMERCIAL VEHICLES
OVER 3 TONg
PROHIBITED
B= 3 TON ~/EIGHT LIMIT
1.5 MILES AHEAD
C: 3 TON ~/EIGHT LIMIT
8 MILES AHEAD
3 TDN VEIGHT LIMIT
AHEAD RAINBOV CANYON
ROAD
TRUCK RESTRICTION SIGNING LAYOUT 'EXHIBIT A'
PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION MINUTES
3.
MARCH 24.1994
Restrictina Trucks ever Three (3) Tons from Pale Road and Rainbow Cenvon Road
Traffic Engineer Marry Lauber presented the staff report,
Chairman Perry suggested the (B) designated'signs should read "3 ton weight limit
ahead I mile" instead of "at the Temecula City line",
I.t was moved by Commissioner Coe,. seconded by Commissioner Guerriero to
recommend to the City Council to restrict trucks over three (3) tons from Rainbow
Canyon Road from Pale Road to the City limits,
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 4
NOES: 0
ABSENT: I
COMMISSIONERS:. Coe, Guerriero, Sander, Perry
COMMISSIONERS: None
COMMISSIONERS: Sander
Traffic ODerations Adiacent to the Temecula Community Recreation Center and Rancho
California Sports Park
Traffic Engineer Marry Lauber presented the staff report and a slide presentation.
Commissioner Sander said he feels there .should be some flexability for overflow
parking on Rancho Vista Road during special events and City Council meetings which
may create large crowds. .
Commissioner Guerriero said he also is concerned there will be a need for the off-site
parking which will be restricted.by the recommendation.-
Engineer Lauber said he discussed the recommendation with the Community Services
Director and his staff and they have expressed no real concerns with the
recommendation.
It was moved by Chairman Perry, seconded by Commissioner Guerriero to recommend
approval of the posting of "No Parking" on the west side of Margarita Road and the
north side of Rancho Vista Road and review for 90 days. If the reviews shows there
is a need for the off-site parking, the Commission will instruct staff to recommend a
change in the striping-and allow for on-street parking.
The motion was carried as follows:
AYES:
4 COMMISSIONERS: Coe, Guerriero, Sander, Perry
FTSCOMMIN03124194
2 · O,4/15/94
TEMECULA COMMUNITY
SERVICES DISTRICT
ITEM I
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
HELD MAY 1 O, 1994
A regular meeting of the Temecula Community Services District was called to order at 8:08
PRESENT: 4 DIRECTORS:
ABSENT: 1 DIRECTORS:
PM.
Birdsall, Parks, Mufioz, Roberrs
Stone
Also present were General Manager Ronald E. Bradley, City Attorney Peter Thorson and June
S. Greek, City Clerk.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None given·
CONSENT CALENDAR
It was moved by Councilmember Mur~oz, seconded by Councilmember Parks to approve
Consent Calendar Items 1-4.
The motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: 4
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 1
Minutes
DIRECTORS: Birdsall, Mu~oz, Parks, Roberrs
DIRECTORS: None
DIRECTORS: Stone
1.1 Approve the minutes of April 5, 1994
Combinina Balance Sheet as of March 31, 1994 and the Statement of Revenues,
Exoenditures and Chanqes in Fund Balance for the Nine Months Ended March 31,1994
2.1 Receiye and file the Combining Balance Sheet as of March 31, 1994 and the
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance for the Nine
Month~ Ended March 31, 1994.
Acceotance of Landscaoe Maintenance Easements
3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 94-02
Minute,,1051094 -1- 05131194
CSD Minutes May 10. 1994
--A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ACCEPTING EASEMENT GRANT DEEDS
FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE EASEMENTS
3.2 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 94-03
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICTACCEPTING OFFERS OF DEDICATIONS FOR
PUBLIC SLOPE AND LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE EASEMENTS
4. Access Easements - Veteran's Park
4.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 94-04
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT, ACCEPTING THE RECONVEYANCE OF
AND EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF INLAND VALLEY CABLEVISION AND
GRANTING A NEW EASEMENT ACROSS VETERAN'S PARK, WITHIN THE CITY
OF TEMECULA
DISTRICT BUSINESS
5. TCSD Proposed Rates and Charass of FY 1994-95
Director of Community Services Shawn Nelson presented the staff report and
recommended that Service Level R be deleted from the levy report for FY 94-95 and
that staff be directed to work with the property owners of Leifer Road .to develop
alternate funding methods.
Director Parks asked if the increased amount of $3.30 covers all the new facilities. Mr.
Nelson reported that it includes all the facilities, including the CRC, the Senior Center
and seven new parks.
Leigh Carpentbr, 3945 Liefer Road, spoke in opposition to removing Service Level "R"
from the levy report.
Director Parks asked if the City could fund the Assessment District instead of going out'
to bond. City Attorney Thorson answered this would be one option that could be
looked at.
Minutes/051094 -2- 05131
CSD Minutes Mev 10, 1994
It was-moved by -Councilmember Mufloz, seconded by Councilmember Parks to
approve staff recommendation with direction that Service Level "R" be removed from
the Levy Report. It was further directed that staff work with the property owners of
Liefer Road to develop alternate funding methods.
5.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 94-05
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ON THE FILING OF A REPORT ON THE
PROPOSED RATES AND CHARGES FOR FISCAL YEAR 1994-95AND SETTING
A TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING IN CONNECTION THEREWITH
The motion was unanimously carried with President Stone absent.
GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT
None given.
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT
Director of Community Services Shawn Nelson announced Riverton Park will be dedicated on
May 19, 1994 at 5:00 PM.
CITY ATTORNEY REPORT
None given.
DIRECTORS REPORTS
None given.
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Dirdctor Roberts, seconded by Director Mu~oz to adjourn at 9:04 PM to a
meeting on May 24, 8:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road,
Temecula, California. The motion was unanimo. usly carried with President Stone absent.
Jeff Stone, President
Minutes/051094 -3- 05/31194
CSD Minutes May 10, 1994
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk\TCSD Secretary
Minutes/051094 ,.4- 05131194
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
...... COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
TUESDAY, MAY 24, 1994
A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Community Services District was called to order
on Tuesday, May 24, 1994, 9:18 P.M., at the Temecula Community Center, 30875
Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California, President Jeffrey E. Stone presiding.
PRESENT: 5 DIRECTORS: Birdsall, Mu~oz, Parks, Roberrs, Stone
ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None
Also present were City Manager Ron Bradley,.'Assistant City Attorney Cheryl Kane, and
Deputy City Clerk Susan Jones.
PUBLIC COMMENT
None
CONSENT CALENDAR
It was moved by Director Parks, seconded by Director Roberts to approve Consent
Calendar Items No. 1 and 2.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 0
DIRECTORS: Birdsall, Mu~ioz, Parks, Roberrs, Stone
DIRECTORS: None
DIRECTORS: None
Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 ApprOve the minutes of April 26, 1994.
Acceptance o~ Easement Deeds and Street Liahtinq
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Accept the easement deeds for the TCSD to provide landscape maintenance
services.
CSDMINOSI24194 1 O6/01194
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MINUTES
2.2-
MAY 24, 1994
- Accept Tract 2'r760 into the existing Rancho Highlands landscape
maintenance rate level;
2.3 Accept arterial and residential street lights.
DISTRICT BUSINESS
City Manager Ron Bradley suggested the Directors continue discussion of this item until
after Item No. 16 of the regular City Council meeting.
The Community Services District was reconvened at 10:05 P.M. to discuss Item No. 3.
Fiscal Year 1994-95 Annual Ooeratinq Budaet
Councilmember Birdsall said she feels the $20,000 set aside for the Arts Council
should be changed to reflect the activity rather than the organization.
It was moved by Director Roberts, seconded by Director Parks to approve staff
recommendation as follows, with the amendment that the $20,000 set aside for the
Arts Council be changed to a Cultural Arts Program Fund:
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 94-06
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ADOPTING THE ANNUAL OPERATING
BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 1994-95 FOR THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY
SERVICES DISTRICT AND ESTABLISHING CONTROLS ON CHANGES IN
APPROPRIATIONS AND PERSONNEL POSITIONS
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5 DIRECTORS:
NOES: 0 DIRECTORS:
ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS:
DEPARTMENTAL REPORT
None
Birdsall, Mu~oz, Parks, Roberts, Stone
None
None
CSDMIN05124/94 2 O6101194
MAY 94, 1994
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MINUTES
GENERAL MANAGERS REPORT - Bradley
None
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT - Nelson
Director Nelson advised the Board of Directors the Public Notices outlining the 1994 rates
and charges have been mailed and a public workshop is scheduled for Wednesday, June 1,
1994, 6:00 P.M. at the Old Town Temecula Senior Center.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS
Director Birdsall asked for a status report on the Parkview property.
Director Nelson advised the RFQ has been completed and will be released on Wednesday,
May 25, 1994 for the designservices for Master Planning the Parkview site.
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Director Parks, seconded by Director Roberts to adjourn at 10:05 P.M.
The next regular meeting of the City of Temecula Community Services District will be held
on Tuesday, June 14, 1994, 8:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista
Road, Temecula, California.
ATTEST:
President Jeffrey E. Stone
June S. Greek, City Clerk
CSDMINO5124/94 3 O6101194
ITEM
NO. 2
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE. OFFICER
CITY MANAGER ,~
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
Community Services Board of Directors
Ronald E. Bradley, General Manager
June 14, 1994
Contract Change Order No. 14
Community Recreation Center - Phase II
Project No. PW92-29B
PREPARED BY:
Shawn D. Nelson, Director of Community Services
Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects
Dennis Armstrong, Assistant Engineer - Capital Projects
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Board of Directors:
Approve Contract Change Order No. 14 for the Community Recreation Center - Phase
II, Project No. PW92-29B, for labor, material, and equipment in the amount of
$48,862.
Transfer $48,862 from Development Impact Fees to the Capital Projects Fund and
appropriate $48,862 to Account # 250-190-129-5804.
BACKGROUND:
During the construction of the Community Recreation Center the following items of work have
resulted in a change to the contract:
CHANGE ORDER NO. 14
Amphitheater Drainaae: Additional drains were installed within the amphitheater to
prevent water from ponding deep enough to enter the electrical conduits within the
amphitheater.
e
Cross Gutter: Sections of the cross gutter traversing the fire lane that was installed
during the rough grading process were removed and replaced, because they no longer
matched the final design elevations of the drainage. system.
pwl 3%agdrpt%94%0614%pw92-29b 060194
Fog Seal: The parking lots were sealed with an oil based slurry to extend the life of the
asphalt and to provide a uniform color and texture to the surface.
Projection Screen: Electrical conduit and wiring were added to supply power which will
provide automatic operation of the projection screen.
Shades: The sun shades in the multipurpose room were modified such that the top and
bottom shade systems could be operated separately.
Sprinkler Heads: The fire sprinkler system 'was modified by adding wall mounted
sprinkler heads in the main hall to the multipurpose room.
Pool and Deck Area: Portions of the concrete deck surrounding the pool suffered
extensive cracking. To maintain the integrity of the deck area, the affected panels of
concrete and pool tiles were removed and replaced.
Wall Protection: A protective wall covering was added to the janitorial supplies closet
in accordance with the Riverside County Health Department.
TOTAL: $48,862
FISCAL IMPACT:
The original contract was awarded in the amount of $4,196,400.00.Contract Change Orders
No.1 through No. 13 were approved for a total amount of $4,353,021.68.Contract Change
Order No. 14 will increase the adjusted contract by an amount not to exceed $48,862.49.The
total adjusted contract amount for the project is $4,401,884.17. It is recommended that
$48,862 be transferred from Development Impact Fees to the Capital Project Fund and
appropriated to cover Change Order #14.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Contract Change Order No. 14
pw13\agdrpt\94~0614%pw92-29b 060194
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive · Ternecula, California 92590
(909) 694-1989 · FAX (909) 694-1999
CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 14
CONTRACT NO. PW92-29B
PROJECT: Community Recreation Center - Phase II
TO CONTRACTOR: T.P. Penick & Sons. inc.
NOTE:
This change order is not effective until aDDroved by the Enoineer.
THIS CHANGE PROVIDES FOR:
An INCREASE in the following items:
elm ·
SHEET 1__ of 2
Amphitheater Drainaee: Additional drains were installed within the amp·theater to
prevent water from ponding deep enough to enter the electrical conduits within the
amphitheater.
Cross Gutter: Sections of the cross gutter traversing the fire lane were damaged by
heavy equipment during construction operations. The damaged sections were removed
and replaced, because they no longer matched the design elevations of the drainage
system·
Foe Seal: The parking lots were sealed with an oil based slurry to extend the life of the
asphalt and to provide a uniform color and texture to the surface.
Projection Screen: Electrical conduit and wiring were added to supply power which will
provide automatic operation of the projection screen.
Shades: The sun shades in the multipurpose room were modified such that the top and
bottom shade s~stems could be operated seperately.
Sprinkler Heads: The fire sprinkler system was modified by adding wall mounted
sprinkler heads in the main hall to the multipurpose room·
Pool and Deck Area: Portions of the concrete deck surrgunding the pool suffered
extensive craoking. To maintain the integrity of the deck area, the affected panels of
concrete and pool tiles were removed and replaced.
Wall Protection: A protective wall cover·fig was added to the janitorial supplies closet
in accordance with the Riverside County Health Department.
TOTAL: $48,862.49
i~,13'~p~oja:~ve.,9~-29b~cco~,o.14 8519~.
CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 14
CONTRACT NO. PW92-29B
SHEET _~ of 2
Original Contract Amount ................................. $4,196,400.00
Adjusted Contract Amount .............. '~ .................. $4,353,021.68
Change Order No. 14 ........................... · .......... $ 48,862.49
Total Contract Amount .................................... $4,401,884.17
Adjustment of Working Days ............................... . 40
Approved: Principal Engr. .y:~~2-f~ Data: ~/~p/~///-
We the undersigned contractor have given careful consideration to the change proposed and
hereby agree. If this proposal is approved, that we will provide all equipment, furnish all
materials, except as may otherwise be noted above, and perform all services necessary for the
work.
Date Accepted: (to'
By: ~-~,~, (s:gnature~%----
Name: oc.
(print)
(company's name)
If the contractor does not sign acceptance of this order, his attention is directed to the
requirements of the specifications as to proceeding with the ordered work and filing a written
protest within the time therein specified.
pw13~pVrojecu'~,82-29b~,o~cco.14 051994
''MNO 3
II
·
APPROVAL R~
CITY
ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICE
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
Community Services Board of Directors
Ronald E. Bradley, General Manager
June 14, 1994
Award of Construction Contract for Loma Linda Park - Phase II
Project No. PW94-02CSD
PREPARED BY:
~'Shawn D. Nelson, Director of Community Services
Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects
Dennis Armstrong, Assistant Engineer - Capital Projects
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Board of Directors:
Award a contract for Loma Linda Park - Phase II, Project PW94-02CSD, to Marina
Contractors, Inc. for $104,104.00and authorize the President to execute the contract
and;
Authorize the General Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the
contingency amount of $10,410.40, which is equal to 10% of the contract amount.
BACKGROUND:
On April 6, 1994 the Board of Directors approved the plans and specifications for Loma Linda
Park - Phase II, Project No. PW94-02CSD, and authorized the Department of Public Works
to solicit public bids.for construction.
The bids were publiciy opened on May 26, 1994. Loma Linda Park - Phase IF is the final
construction phase of Loma Linda Park. Phase II is comprised of 7 lots and encompasses
approximately I acre. The project includes the installation of landscaping and an automatic
irrigation system, a tot-lot play area with rublSerized access, play equipment, barbecues,
benches, bike racks, and picnic tables. The project also includes the construction of concrete
sidewalks, mow strips and drainage facilities. The engineer's estimate for this project is
$130,000.
Seven bids were received for the project and the results are as follows:
1. Marina Contractors, Inc ...................... $104, 104.00.
-1- pwl 3\agdrpt~94~0416~pw94-O2.awd 0602
2. Nottson Construction, Inc ..................... $115,860.00.
3. Bopark'Enterprises;'ldd; ...................... $118,037.00.
4. Sean Malek Engineering & Construction ........... $123,900.00.
5. Wyatt Construction ......................... $128,759.00.
6. Oakridge Landscape & Irrigation ................ $140,255.00.
7. Cunningham-Davis Corp ...................... $149,890.00.
Marina Contractors, Inc. has performed work similar in scope to Loma Linda Park - Phase II
for other agencies and builders within Southern California. Based on comments we have
received from the references listed in the bid documents, the work completed by Marina
Contractors, Inc. has been acceptable.
The construction schedule is for 170 calendar days, which includes the 90 day maintenance
period. Work is expected to begin in early July, 1994 and be completed by the middle of
November, 1994.
A copy of the bid summary is available for review in the City Engineer's office.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Loma Linda Park Phase II is being funded through Quimby Fees which have been
appropriated to Account No. 210-190-134-5804. The total project amount is $114,514.40
which includes the contract amount of $104,104.00plus the 10% contingency of $10,41.40.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Contract
-2o pwl 3\agdrpt\94\0416~pw94-O2.awd 0602
..... CX'X'~ OIP'~4BOULA; PUBLXC~ WORKB DEPAR'I'M.BI~
PROJECT NO. PW94-O2CSD
LOMA LINDA PARE PHASE II
THIS CONTRACT, made and entered into the 14TH day of JUNE, 1994, by and between the City
of Temecula, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CITY", and Marina Contractors,
Inc., hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR."
WITNESSETH:
That CITY and CONTRACTOR, for the consideration hereinafter named, mutually agree as follows:
1.a.
CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The complete Contract includes all of the Contract Documents, to
wit: Notice Inviting Bids, Instructions to Bidders, Proposal, Performance Bond, Labor and
Materials Bond, Plans and Specifications entitled PROJECT NO. PW94-02CSD LOMA LINDA PARK
PHASE II, Insurance Forms, this Contract, and all modifications and amendments thereto, the
State of California Department of Transportation Standard Specifications (1992 Ed.) where
specifically referenced in the Plans and Technical Specifications, and the latest version of the
Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, including all supplements as written and
promulgated by the Joint Cooperative Committee of the Southern California Chapter of the
American Associated General Contractors of California (hereinafter, "Standard Specifications") as
amended by the General Specifications, Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications for
PROJECT NO. PW94-02CSD LOMA LINDA PARK PHASE II. Copies of these Standard
Specifications are available from the publisher:
Building News, Incorporated
3055 Overland Avenue
Los Angeles, California 90034
(213) 202-7775
The Standard Specifications will control the general provisions, construction materials, and
construction methods for this Contract except as amended by the General, Specifications, Special
Provisions, and Technical Specifications for Project No. PW94-02CSD LOMA LINDA PARK PHASE
II. .
pw 13\cip~projeots~pw94-02 .cad\contract
In case of conflict-between the Standard Specifications and the other Contract Documents, the
other Contract Documents shall take precedence over and be used in lieu of such conflicting
portions.
Where the Contract Document describe portions of the work in general terms, but not in complete
detail, it is understood that the item is to be furnished and installed completed and in place and
that only the best general practice is to be used. Unless otherwise specified, the CONTRACTOR
shall furnish all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and incidentals, and do all the work involved in'
executing the Contract.
The Contract Documents are complementary, and what is called for by anyone shall be as binding
as if called for by all. Any conflict between this COntract and any other Contract Document shall
be resolved in favor of this Contract.
SCOPE OF WORK. CONTRACTOR shall perform everything required to be performed, shall
provide and furnish all the labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable equipment, and all utility
and transportation services required for the following:
PROJECT NO. PW94-O2CSD
LOMA UNDA PARK PHASE II
All of said work to be performed and materials to be furnished shall be in strict accordance with
the Drawings and Specifications and the provisions of the Contract Documents hereinabove
enumerated and adopted by CITY.
CITY APPROVAL. All labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services shall be furnished and work
performed and completed under the direction and supervision and subject to the approval of CITY
or its authorized representatives.
CONTRACT AMOUNT AND SCHEDULE. CITY agrees to pay and CONTRACTOR agrees to accept
in full payment for the work above-agreed to be done, the sum of: ONE HUNDRED AND FOUR
THOUSAND AND ONE HUNDRED AND FOUR DOLLARS and 00 CENTS {$104,104,00),the total
amount of the base bid.
CONTRACTOR agrees to complete the work in a period not to exceed one hundred and seventy
{170| days, commencing with delivery of Notice to Proceed by CITY. Eighty (80) working days
will be allowed for construction of the improvements and ninety |90) calendar days will be
required for maintenance. Construction shall not commence until bonds and insurance are
approved by CITY. :
pwl 3\cip~projects~pw94-02.csd~contract
CHANGE ORDERS. All change orders shall be approved by the City Council, except that the City
Manager is hereby authorized by the City Council to make, by written order, changes or additions
to the work in an amount not to exceed the contingency as established by the City Council.
PAYMENTS.
Before submittal of the first payment request, the CONTRACTOR shall submit to the City Engineer
a schedule of values allocated to the various portions of the work, prepared in such form and
supported by such data to substantiate its accuracy as the City Engineer may require. This
schedule, as approved by the City Engineer, shall be used as the basis for reviewing the
CONTRACTOR's payment requests.
Pursuant to Section 20104.50 of the Public Contracts Code, within thirty (30) days after
submission of a payment request to the City, the CONTRACTOR shall be paid a sum equal to
ninety percent (90%) of the value of the work completed. Payment request forms shall be
submitted on or about the thirtieth (30th) day of each successive month as the work progresses.
The final payment, if unencumbered, or any part thereof unencumbered, shall be made sixty (60)
days after completion of the work and the CONTRACTOR filing a one-year Warranty and an
Affidavit of Final Release with the CITY on forms provided by the CITY.
Payments shall be made on demands drawn in the manner required by law, accompanied by a
certificate signed by the City Manager, stating that the work for which payment is demanded has
been performed in accordance with the terms of the Contract, and that the amount stated in the
certificate is due under the terms of the Contract. Partial payments on the Contract price shall
not be considered as an acceptance of any part of the work.
Interest ~hall be paid on all undisputed payment requests not paid within 30 days pursuant to
Public Contracts Code Section 20104.50. Public Contracts Code Section 7107 is hereby
incorporated by reference.
pw 13~cipkorojects~pw94-02.esd~contract
WARRANTY RETENTION. Commencing with the date the Notice of Completion is recorded, the
CITY shall retain a portion of the Contract award price, to assure warranty performance and
correction of construction deficiencies according to the following schedule:
CONTRACT AMOUNT
925,000-975,000
975,000-9500,000
Over 9500,000
RETENTION PERIOD
180 days
180 days
One Year
RETENTION PERCENTAGE
3%
$2,250 + 2% of amount in
excess of 975,000
910,750 + 1% of amount
in excess of 9500,000
LIQUIDATED DAMAGES: EXTENSION OF TIME. In accordance with Government Code Section
53069.85, CONTRACTOR agrees to forfeit and pay to CITY the sum of One Thousand Dollars
(91,000.00) per day for each calendar day completion is delayed beyond the time allowed
pursuant to Paragraph 4 of this Contract. Such sum shall be deducted from any payments due to
or to become due to CONTRACTOR. Such sum shall be deducted from any payments due to or to
become due to CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR will be granted an extension of time and will not
be assessed liquidated damages for unforeseeable delays beyond the control of and without the
fault or negligence of the CONTRACTOR including delays caused by CITY. CONTRACTOR is
required to promptly notify CITY of any such delay.
e
WAIVER OF CLAIMS. On or before making each request for payment under Paragraph 6 above,
CONTRACTOR shall submit to CITY, in writing, all claims for compensation as to work related to
the payment. Unless the CONTRACTOR has disputed the amount of the. payment, the acceptance
by CONTRACTOR of each payment shall constitute a release of all claims against the CITY related
to the payment. CONTRACTOR shall be required to'execute an affidavit, release and indemnity
agreement with each claim for payment.
10.
PREVAILING WAGES. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the State
of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and the
general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each craft, classification, or type of
workman needed to execrate this Contract, from the Director of the Department of Industrial
Relations. These rates are on file with the City Clerk. Copies may be obtained at cost at the City
Clerk's office of Temecula. CONTRACTOR shall po~t a copy of such wage rates at the job site
and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage rates as ~ minimum. CONTRACTOR shall comply with
the provisions of Sections 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code.
pw 13\cip~projects~ow94-O2.csd~contract
Pursuant to the provisions of t-775 of the Labor Code, CONTRACTOR shall forfeit to the CITY, as
a penalty, the sum of ~25.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each laborer, worker,
or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any work done under this
Contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of the Contract.
11.
TIME OF THE ESSENCE. Time is of the essence in this contract.
12.
INDEMNIFICATION. All work covered by this Contract done at the site of construction or in
preparing or delivering materials to the site shall be at the risk of CONTRACTOR alone.
CONTRACTOR agrees to save, indemnify, hold harmless and defend CITY, its officers, employees,
and agents, against any and all liability, injuries, or death of persons (CONTRACTOR's employees
included) and damage to property, arising directly or indirectly out of the obligations herein
undertaken or out of the operations conducted by CONTRACTOR, save and except claims or
litigations arising through the sole active negligence or sole willful misconduct of the CITY.
13.
GRATUITIES. CONTRACTOR warrants that neither it nor any of its employees, agents, or
representatives has offered or given any gratuities or promises to CITY's employees, agents, or
representatives witha view toward securing this Contract or securing favorable treatment with
respect thereto.
14.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST. CONTRACTOR warrants that he has no blood or marriage relationship,
and that he is not in any way associated with any City officer or employee, or any architect,
engineer, or other puerperal of the Drawings and Specifications for this project. CONTRACTOR
further warrants that no person in his/her employ has been employed by the CITY within one year
of the date of the Notice Inviting Bids.
15.
CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT. After the completion of the work contemplated by this Contract,
CONTRACTOR shall file with the City Manager his affidavit stating that all workmen and persons
employed, all firms supplying materials, and all subcontractors upon the Project have been paid in
full, and that there are no claims outstanding against the Project for either labor or materials,
except certain items, if any, to be set forth in an affidavit covering disputed claims or items in
connection with a Stop Notice which has been filed under the provisions of the laws of the State
of California.
pwl 3\cip~projects~pw94-O2.csd%contract
16. - ........
NOTICE TO CITY OF LABOR DISPUTES. Whenever CONTRACTOR has knowledge that any actual
or potential labor dispute is delaying or threatens to delay the timely performance of the Contract,
CONTRACTOR shall immediately give notice thereof, including all relevant information with
respect thereto, to CITY.
17.
BOOKS AND RECORDS. CONTRACTOR's books, records, and plans or such part thereof as may
be engaged in the performance of this Contract, shall at all reasonable times be subject to
inspection and audit by any authorized representative of the CITY.
18.
INSPECTION. The work shall be subject to inspection and testing by CITY and its authorized
representatives during manufacture and construction and all other times and places, including
without limitation, the plans of CONTRACTOR and any of its suppliers. CONTRACTOR shall
provide all reasonable facilities and assistance for the safety and convenience of inspectors. All
inspections and tests shall be performed in such manner as to not unduly .delay the work. The
work shall be subject to final inspection and acceptance notwithstanding any payments or other
prior inspections. Such final inspection shall be made within a reasonable time after completion of
the work.
19.
DISCRIMINATION. CONTRACTOR represents that it has not, and agrees that it will not,
discriminate in its employment practices on the basis of race, creed, religion, national origin, color,
sex, age, or handicap.
20.
GOVERNING LAW. This Contract and any dispute arising hereunder shall be governed by the law
of the State of California.
21.
WRITTEN NOTICE. Any written notice required to be given in any part of the Contract
Documents shall be performed by depositing the same in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid, directed
to the address of the CONTRACTOR as set forth in the Contract Documents, and to the CITY
addressed as follows:
Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590-3606
pwl 3~cip~projects~pw94-02.csd\contract
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties .hemto have caused this Contract to be executed on the date
first above written.
DATED: CONTRACTOR
By:
DATED:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Print or type NAME
Print or type TITLE
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Ron Roberts, Mayor
City Attorney
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
pw 13~cip~projects~pw94-02 .csd~contrect
ITEM
NO.
4
APPRO~
CITY .
A'FFORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO.'
Board of Directors
FROM:
Ronald E. Bradley, General Manager
DATE:
June 14, 1994
SUBJECT:
PREPARED BY:
RECOMMENDATION:
Replacement of Landscape Bonds for Slope Improvements -
Cosrain Homes/Vintage Hills
~<~~3eryl Yasinosky, Management Assistant
That the Board of Directors:
Authorize the replacement of landscape bonds for slope improvements to Tract No. 22915-2,
Tract No. 22915-3, and Tract No. 22916-3 - Cosrain HomesNintage Hills.
BACKGROUND: Landscape/Erosion Control Agreements and Surety Bonds for the
above referenced development were originally posted with the County of Riverside Building
and Safety Department by:
TayCo (Joint Venture of Taylor Woodrow Homes
& Cosrain Homes, Inc.)
3991 MacArthur Blvd.
Newport Beach, CA 92660
The original documents have since been transferred to the City and the Developer has
provided bond riders which change the Obligee from the County of Riverside to the City of
Temecula. The surety bonds were issued by American Home Assurance Company and are
identified as follows:
1. Tract No. 22915-2; Bond No. PB300 11 472 in the amount of $22,000.00.
2. Tract No. 229~5-3; Bond No. PB300 11 474 in the amount of $127,000.00.
3. Tract No. 22916-3; Bond No. PB300 12 647 in the amount of $158,000.00.
On December 31,1993, Costain Homes, Inc. officially withdrew its general partnership with
Tayco by filing an Amended Statement of Partnership, a copy of which is attached for your
review. As a result of this action, Costain Homes became responsible for providing the
appropriate bonds for the aforementioned developments.
r:\yasinobk\csd.bnd 061494
Therefore, Costain Homes has entered into a new agreement with the City to improve the
slope and landscape areas and is requesting that the former documents be replaced with new
bonds from -American Mot0?iSt~ Insurance Company in the full amount as follows:
Tract No. 22915-2;
Tract No. 22915-3;
Tract No. 22916-3;
Bond No. 3SM 802 562 00 in the amount of $22,000.00.
Bond No. 3SM 802 564 O0 in the amount of ~ 127,000.00.
Bond No. 3SM 802 565 00 in the amount of 9158,000.00.
The developer has dedicated slope and landscape areas within these tracts to the City for
maintenance purposes· However, these bonds will remain in place until final acceptance of
the landscape improvements and recommendation by the Board of Directors to release the
bonds.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
ATTACHMENTS:
Bond Riders/County Bonds.
Replacement Bonds.
Amended Statement of Partnership.
r:\yasinobk\csd ,bnd O61494
First Amancsn Title Insurance Company
RECORDING REQUESTED BY: '
TAYLOR WOODROW HOMES_CALIFORNIA LIMITED
24461 Ridge Route Drive
Laguna Hills, California 92653-1686
WHEN RECORDED, MAIL TO:
TIMOTHY L. RA/qDALL, ESQ.
MESERVE, MUMPER & HUGHES
18500 Von Karman Avenue #600
Irvine, California 92715
AMENDED STATEMENT.OF PARTNERSHIP
OF'
TAYCO, a General Partnership
1. The name of this partnership is TAYCO, a
California general partnership.
2. The names of each of the partners is:
TAYLOR WOODROW HOMES CALIFOR/~IA LIMITED, a
California corporation
and
TAYLOR WOODROW REAL ESTATE, a California
corporation
3. The Partners named in paragraph 2 of this
statement are all of the Partners.
4- COSTAIN HOMES INC., a Delaware corporation, has
withdrawn as a General Partner of TAYCO effective as of
December 31, 1993.
California.
, 1994, at
COSTAIN HOMES INC., a
Delaware corporation,
Withdrawn Genebal Partner
TAYLOR WOODROW HOMES
Richard E. Pope
President
O012785.01
41~4,t
TAYLOR WOODROW REAL ESTATE, a
California corporation,
General Partner
Vi esident
0012785.01
VERIFICATION
I, RICHARD E. POPE, declare:
I am President of TAYLOR WOODROW HOMES CALIFORNIA
LIMITED, a California corporation, Partner in the
Partnership named in the named in the foregoing Statement of
Partnership.
I have read the 'foregoing Statement of Partnership,
know the contents thereof, and the same is true of my own
knowledge.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing
is true and correct.
Executed on
t.,;j.,,-., .: i-!, t[
this
Zt;.'k day f ~u~,~;= ~'~ ' 1994 at
Californig. ' ~ ~ ~
RICHARD E. POPE
I, JEFFREY J. PROSTOR, declare:
I am Vice President of TAYLOR WOODROW REAL ESTATE, a
California corporation, Partner in the Partnership named in
the named in the foregoing Statement of Partnership.
I have read the foregoing Statement of PartnersNip,
know the contents thereof, and the same is true of my'own
knowledge.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing
is true and correct.
Executed on this '21<~ day of
)~',-,-~,:v,z , 1994 at
, California. /
PROSTOR
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ' )
) ss.
COUNTY OF-ORANGE ..... )
to me (uf ~rovcd t~'~'-mc on the basis of satin-factory
evidcncc) to be the person(~) whose name(~4 is/a~-e-
subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me
that -hc/she/t-~ executed the same. in kis/her/~he~-r
authorized capacity(it=) and that by ~P=~/her~t~eir
signature¢~) on the instrument the person(e), or the entity
upon behalf of which the personCe~ acted, executed the
instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
416.i6
Notary Pu~ic in and
Said County and State
for
416.!4
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF-ORANGE ..... )
on , before
.personally appeared RICPEARD E. POPE, personally known to me
(or proved tw m= ~n LL= basis ~f satisfactory ~vidcn~c) to
be the person(~4 whose name(s} is/~ subscribed to the
within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/s~thcy
executed the same in his/he~/~ authorized capacity(ies)
and that by his/hee~ signature(~ on the instrument the
personnel, or the entity upon behalf of which the person'-~
acted, executed the instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official se~l ....
_=e_ l~l~ OFFICIAL SEAL
Linda Enright
NOTARY PUBLIC - CALIFORNIA
ORANGE COUNTY
Said County and State
for
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
On ~~ ~ ~ ~ 1994 before me,
personally appeared JEFFREY J. PROSTOR, personally known to
me (or provcd to mc o~ ~ basis of catiofa~Lo~y =viac~c)
to be the person Cs-~ whose name(c) is/e~e subscribed to the
within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/s4%e+t4%ey
executed the same in his/h~l/Lhcir authorized-capacity(ies)
and that by his/her/~he-i-~_ signature+~) on the instrument the
person(~, or the entity upon behalf of which the person+s~
acted, executed the instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
~ ' "' Linda Enright ,
f ~TARY PUBLIC CALIFOP, NIA~,
ORANGE COUNTY
d
Said County and State
for
TRACT NO. 22915-2
EROSION AND LANDSCAPE CSA
RIDER
BOND NO. PB300 11 472
In consideration of the premium charged, it is understood and agreed that:
Effective from the 31st day of December. 1993.
THE OBLIGEE'S NAME IS HEREBY CHANGED:
From: County of Riverside
To: City of Temecula
Provided, however, that the liability of the American Home Assurance Company under the attached
bond and under the attached bond as changed by this rider shall not be cumulative.
Nothing herein contained shall be held to vary, waive, alter or extend any of the tens, conditions,
agreements or warranties of the undermentioned bond, other than as stated above.
Attached to and forming a part of Bond No. PB300 ll 472 issued by the American Home Assurance
Comvany dated the 23rd day of Aueust 1989 on behalf of Tavco (joint venture of Taylor Woodrow
Homes and Costain Homes) and in favor of County of Riverside.
Signed this 31st day of March. 1994.
TAYCO, a California general partnership
· (Taylor Woodrow Homes California Limited,
a California Corporation and Taylor Woodrow
Real Estate. A California Corporation)
Pri c~3al
American Home Assurance Company
Bri'an E. Gagan, Attorney-igOr
' ,~mer4.,.~n Home Assurance Company
National Union F'we Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa.
Principal Bo~d Office: 70 ~ ~ Ntw York, N.Y. 1(1270
POWER OF ATIX)RNEY
No. 03-B-OlO01
Ir ~W ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:
Tha~ Araerican Home ~ .. _C.O~npany, · Nt~ YO_tk .. _c~,pontioe, and National Union Fu~ Inmamnd~ cx~npany o/Pitlsbu,-gh, Pa., · Pennv/ivania corporation.
does each bere. J~/appoint
---Richard R. HerL~berg. N. Owens, Ijsa I -~ngdon, Brian E. Gagan: of San F~ California--
i:s xru~ and lawful Attornvi(s)=in-Fnct, with full authority to execute on its behalf bonds, under-dt4n.ot, ff~,x-~i-am,e~ and other
obligatory in the natuxz thereof, issu~ in fig coum of its businca, and to bind fig ~ coraltony thereby.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Am~rk= no~ A~nn= Com~y and Naao=a U~k-- F=~ ~ ~Y of Pimbur~
xh~ p~nts
STATE OF NEW YORK }
COUNTY OF NEW YORKin,
On ~ 7 day of Augug ,19~.
bcfor~ me came the abo~ named o/]~4:gr of Angrican Home
t~ nce ~m~ny ~d Na~ U~ F~ l~u~ ~m~y
o ~u~, Pt, w ~ ~ ~ w ~ t~ i~d~l ~d
officer d~ he~in, ~d ~ t~t ~ ex~t~ t~
fo~going i~t~mcnt ~ aff~ t~ ~ d u~
the~to by aut~ d h~ off~
NOZ. Z,C~O
New Va,.~
O~-NO46527$d
CERTIFICATE
Excerpts o/Rr. wlution~ adol~exl by the Bo~rd~ of Director~ of American Hom~ Ar~uram~ ~y ~ Na~ U~ F~ ~u~ ~y d Pi~u~, Pa-
on May 18, 1~6:
· ~SOL~D, that ~ ~a d ~ ~, t~ ~i~nt, or any V~ P~tnt ~, ~ ~ ~ autho~ to a~t~Fm to ~p~nt and '
ac~ for and oa ~lf d ~ ~y ~ ex~te ~ u~n~ ~~ ~ ~r ~ d ~ ~ ~ ~to~ h ~e n~ ~e~f,
and to at~h t~to ~ w~n~ ~1 d t~ ~pny, in t~ t~ d i~ su~W b~
· ~S OL~D, ~t me ~m~ a~ att~mt~ d ~h ~ ~ t~ ~i d t~ ~y ~y ~ ~ w ~y s~ P~r ~ ~ ~ to ~y ~n~te
~lating the~to by fni~, ~ ny ~h P~r ~ Anom~ or ~nffi~te ~flng szh f~ ~m~ or f~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ bh~g ~n the
~m~ny ~en w aff~ ~th ~ to ~y ~, un~m~n~ ~n~ or ~r ~t~ d i~mni~ ~ ~t~ ~liptoW h ~ ~m~
'~SOL~D, t~t ~y s~h AtW~F~ ~l~ng a ~ ~ifat~ ~t ~ fo~ ~ut~ ~ ~ ~ eff~ my ~n ~ ~ ~on the
date the~, u~ ~ w ~ ~ h~r t~ ~ ~te ~ ~1~ t~ by s~ A~F~"
I. ~bc~ M. T~ ~ d ~ H~e ~ ~ny ~ ~ Nati~ U~ F~ I~ ~m~y ~ H~u~ PK ~ ~ ~ni~ t~t the
fo~ing e~ d ~u~ ~ ~ t~ h~ d Dixon d t~ ~m~ ~ ~ P~n d An~ ~ ~t ~egt~ a~ t~ and
~a, and ~t ~th ~ ~u~ ~ ~ P~n dAno~y a~ in full fo~ a~ eff~.
'.¥ITNESS WHEREOF. I ~,~ hc~unto r, et n~), hand and affuagl the facsimik gal of each corporation
this _.31_SC dayof March ,1' 94.
i~lizabeth M. TUck, Secretary.
AeOREEMENT
FOR EROSION CONTROL AND LANDSCAPE/HPROVEMENTS
This Agreement, made and entered into by and between the County of Riverside, State
of Californ.ia,._hereinafter*-cal]ed County, and TayCo {Joina) vent f T lnr
· , r ?,~l~e% ~:ont~a~or. Woodrow Homes &
Cosrain Homes Inc.] herein te c
284-44
WXTNESSETH
FXRST: Contractor, for and in consideration-of the issuance of grading and landscaping
permits in the development of that certain ]and diviston known as Tract 22915-2
C.S.A. slODes agrees, at Contractor's own cost and expense, to furnish
all labor, equipment and material necessary to perform and complete, and within twelve
months from the date this agreement is executed, to perform and complete in a good and
workmanlike manner, all those erosion control, *-landscape and irrigation improvements
in accordance with those landscape and Irrigation plans for the development of said
land division which have been approved by the County Bui]dtng Director, and are on file
in the Office of the Riverside County Building and Safety Department and to do all work
incidental thereto in accordance with the standards set forth in Riverside County Ordinance
No. 457, as mended, which are expressly made a part of this agreement. All of the
above required work shall be done under the'inspection of and to the satisfaction of,
the County Building Director, and shall not be deemed complete until approval of the
final planting inspection is made by the Building Director. Contractor further agrees
to maintain the above required improvements, following the approval of the final planting
inspection, until the structure is occupied and, during this period to restore, repair
or replace, to the satisfaction of the Building Director, any defective work or labor
done or defective materials furnished. The estimated cost of said work and improvements
is the sum of TWENTY'~rVqO THOUSAND dollars
($22,000.00 )-' ~ ......... )
SECOND: Contractor agrees to pay to the County the actual cost of such inspection of
the works and improvements ar may be required by the Building Director. Contractor
further agrees that if suit is brought upon this agreement or any bond guaranteeing
the completion of the landscape and irrigation improvements, all costs and reasonable
expenses and fees incurred by the County in successfully enforcing such obligations
shall be paid by Contractors including reasonable attorney's fees, and that upon entry
of judgement, such costs, expenses and fees shall be taxed as costs and included in
any judgment rendered.
THIRD: County shall not, nor shall any officer or employee of County, be liable or
responsible for any accident, loss or damage happening r occurring to the works specified
in this agreement prior to the completion and approval thereof, nor shall County or
any officer or employee thereof, be liable for any persons or property injured by reason
of the nature of the work, or by reason of the acts or omissions of Contractor, his
agents or employees, in his performance of the work, and all of said liabilities are
assumed by Contractor. Contractor agrees *to protect, defend and hold harmless County
and the officers and employees thereof 'from all loss,' liability or claim because of,
or arising out of the acts of omissions of Contractor, his agents and employees, in
the performance of this agreement, or arising out of the use of any patent or patented
article in the performance of this Agreement.
FOURTH: The Contracto~ hereby grants to the County, and to any agent or employee of
· .-the.County, the irrevocable permission to enter upon the lands of the above referenced
land division for the purpose of completing the improvements. -This permission shall
terminate in the event:that the Contractor has completed the work within the time specified
or any extension thereof granted by the Building Director.
FIFTH: Contractor agrees at all times, up _to the completion and approval of the final
planting inspection by the Building Director, to*2gtve good and adequate warning to the
traveling public of each and every dangerous condition caused by the construction of
the improvements, and to protect the traveling public from such defective or dangerous
cond i tons.
SIXTH: The Contractor, his agents and employees, shall give notice to the Building Direc-
tor at least 48 hours before beginning any work and shall furnish said Building Director
all reasonable facilities for obtaining full information respecting the progress and
manner of work.
SEVENTH: If the Contractor, or his agents or employees, neglects, refuses, or fails
to prosecute the work with such diligence as to insure its completion within the specified
time, or within such extensions of time as have been granted by the Building Director,
or if the Contractor violates, neglects, refuses or fails to perform satisfactorily any
of the provisions of the plans and specifications, he shall be in default of this
Agreement and notice in writing of such default shall be served upon him.. The Building
11/B?
Director shall have the power ~o terminate all right~ of the Contractor because of such
default. The determination by the Building Dtrector of the question as to whether any
of the terms of the agreement or specifications have been violated or have not been per-
formed satisfactorily shall be conclusive upon the Contractor, and any and all parties
who may have any interest in the agreement or any portion thereof. The foregoing pro-
visions of this section shall be in addition to all rights and remedies available to
the County ~nde~ law .....
EIGHTH: The Contractor agrees to file with County prior to the date this agreement is
executed a good and sufficient improvement security in any mount not less than the esti-
mated cost of the work and improvements for the faithful performance of the terms and
conditions of this agreement and Contractor further agrees that if the improvement security
is a bond and if the sureties on the faithful performance bond or the mount of said
bonds in the opinion of the Building Director becomes insufficient, Contractor agrees
to renew each and every said bond or bonds with good and sufficient sureties or increase
the mount of said bonds, or both, within ten days after being notified by the Building
Director that the sureties or -mounts are insufficient'~ Notwithstanding any other pro-
vision herrein, if Contractor fails to take such action as is necessary to comply with
said notice, he shall be in default of this Agreement unless all required improvements
are completed within 90 days of the date on which the Building Director notified the
Contractor of the insufficiency of the sureties or the mount of the bonds or both.
NINTH: It is further agreed by and between the parties hereto, including the surety
or sureties on the bonds securing this agreement that, in the event it is deemed necessary
to extend the time of completion of the work contemplated to be done under this agreement,
extensions of time may be granted from time to time by the Building Director either at
his own option or upon request of the Contractor, and such extensions shall in no way
affect the validit~ of this agreement or release the s~rety or suretie~ on said bonds.
Contractor further agrees to maintain the aforesaid bond or bonds in full force and effect
during the terms of this agreement, including any extensions of time as may be granted
therein.
TENTH: It is understood and agreed by the parties hereto that if any part, term or prov-
ision of this Agreement is by the courts held to be unlawful and void, the validity of
the remaining portions shall not be affected and the rights and obligations of the parties
shall be construed and enforced as if the Agreement did not contain the particular part,
term or provision held to be invalid.
ELEVENTH: Any notice or notices required or permitted to be given pursuant to this agree-
ment shall be served on the other party by mail, postage prepaid, at the following ad-
dresses:
County
Director of Building & Safety
County of Riverside
County Administrative Center
4080 Lemon Street - 2nd Floor
Riverside, CA. g2501
Tay. Co (joi ec~qctr~-~t°~f Tayl t.$oodrow Homes
tainntH~mesY or
cos --
WpO u ,
IN WITNESS WHEREOF Contractor has affixed his name, address and seal.
Dated:
ATTEST:
Gerald A. Maloney Clerk
By
Deputy
Zay n.~ venture TaX o I drow & C~styin Homes)
~ of Riverside '
Approved as to Form:
Gerald j. Geerlings, County Counsel
SIGN ACTOR MUST BE WITNESSED BY NOTARY A~iD-EXECUTED IN DUPLICATE
AGREEMENT
OF
GENERAL PARTNERSHIP
OF
TayCo
THIS AGREEMENT OF GENERAL PARTNERSHIP ("Agreement") is
dated as of ~{h ~10 , 1988, and is entered into by
and among the following:
TAYLOR WOODROW HOMES CALIFORNIA LIMITED, a
California corporation ("TWH"); and
COSTAIN HOMES INC., a Delaware corporation ("CHI")
(collectively referred to. as the "Partners" and individ-
ually as "Partner").
RECITALS
The Partners hereto vo!untariIy associate themselves in
order to (i) acquire fee title in and to that certain real
property and all improvements thereon, more particularly
described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto ( the "Property" );
(ii) process all required maps and take all steps recuired to
receive all necessary entitlements from all governmental
authorities for the development of the Property; (iii) cause
to be constructed all necessary improvements ( the "Improve-
ments" ) in order to create finished lots upon which single
family homes can be constructed (the "Lots"); (iv) market the
Property upon completion of construction of the Improvements
(collectively the "Partnership Business") ·
IN FURTHERANCE OF THE FOREGOING, and in consideration of
the mutual covenants and promises contained herein, the Part-
ners agree as follows:
ARTICLE 1
ORGANIZATION; PARTNERS
1.1 Formation and Name·
'The Partners hereby associate themselves in a gen-
eral partnership pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 1,
Title 2, of the California Corporations Code, known as the
"Uniform Partnership Act" (the "Act"), to operate under the
name and style of TayCo (the "~artnership"). Except as other-
wise expressly provided in this Agreement, the rights and
obligations of the Partners and the administration and
/ signing of this Agreement, except as to those joint responsi-
? .... bilities,.-li~bilities,---indebtedness, or obligations incurred
" after the date of this Agreement and as limited by the terms
of this Agreement. This Agreement shall not be deemed to
-' create a general partnership between the Partners concerning
any activities other than those activities that are within
the scope and business purposes of the Partnership as speci-
fied herein.
5.2 Management.
The management and control of the Partnership is
vested in the Partners and all significant.decisions regard-
ing the business and activities of the Partnership shall be
made only by both Partners, each having one (1) vote. Each
Partner shall designate in writing from time to time its
respective representative for purposes of casting said
votes. Each representative (or alternate) shall be fully
authorized to provide .any consent or approval which may be
required herein. TWH initially designates GORDON TIPPELL as
its representative and RICHARD POPE as its alternate repre-
sentative. CHI. initially designatesI JACK DANGELO as its
representative ~nd DAVID 'JACKSON" as its alternate
representative.
Subject to the foregoing, the day-to-day manage-
ment and operation of the Partnership and the obligation to
do all things necessary to carry on its business and promote
its purposes shall be vested in the Partners as follows:
(a) CBI shall be responsible for land planning
and the processing of all approvals necessary in order
to develop the Property in accordance with the terms of
this Agreement;
(b) TWH shall be responsible for construction
engineering, construction management and Partnership
accounting.
The Partners shall be entitled to reimbursement
for all costs incurred by them in the performance of their
duties under this Section (the "Reimbursable Costs"),
together with an amount equal to fifteen percent (15%) of
such ReimbursaBle Costs (the "Overhead Fee"). The
Reimbursable Costs and Overhead Fee shall be payable by the
Partnership to the Partner incurring such Reimbursable Costs
upon written demand by such Partner, together'with copies of
invoices or other documents as reasonably necessary to evi-
dence the expenditure of such Reimbursable Costs.
5.3 Limitation of Authority.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, no Partner shall,
without the prior written consent of the other Partner:
10.
TAYLOR WOODROW HOMES CALIFORNIA LTD.
NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSONS EXECUTING THE AGREEMENTS
TAYLOR WOODROW HOMES CALIFORNIA LTD.
Mr. Richard E. Pope 3991 MacArthur Blvd., Newport Beach, CA 92660
COSTAIN HOMES INC.
Mr. David B. Ja(kson 620 Newport Center Drive, Suite 400, Newport Beach, CA 92660
FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND
FOR EROSION CONTROL AND LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS
"' ....... COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
For: Erosion Control -
Landscape and
Irrigation $22,000.00
Tract No. 22915-2
C.S.A~ Slopes
Parcel Map No.
Bond No. PB3001 14 72
Surety American Home Assurance Compnay
Address 3 Embarcadero Center'
San Francisco, CA 94111.
City
Premium $220.00
Principal TayCo (Joint venture of Taylor
Woodrow Homes & Costain Homes Inc.)
Address 3991 MacArthur Blvd.
City Newport Beach, CA 92660
Whereas, the County of Riverside, State of California, and TayCo (joint venture of Taylor Woodrow~
Homes & Costain Homes Inc.) (hereinafter designated' as "Principal") has entered
into, or is about to enter into, the attached Agreement whereby Principal agrees to'
install and complete the abo~~gnated erosion control, landscape and irrigation-
improvements, relating to , which Agreement is hereby
r~ ~ed to and made a part hereof; and
WHEREAS, said principal is required under the terms of said Agreement to furnish a bond
for the faithful performance of said Agreement;
NOW, THEREFORE, we, the Principal and American Home Assurance Company ,
as. surety, are held and firmly bound unto the County of Riverside, in the penal sum
of Twenty-two thousand Dollars ($22,000.00 (includes cont) )
]aw~u] money of the United States' for the payment of which sum we]] and truly to be
made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, successors, executorS-Tand administrators, jointly
and severally, firmly by these presents.
The condition of this obligation is such that if the above bonded Principal, his or
its heirs, executors, administrators, successors or assigns, shall in all things stand
to and abide by, and well and truly keep and perform the covenants, conditions and pro-
visions in the said Agreement and any alteration thereof made as therein provided, on
his or their part, to be kept and performed at the same time and in the manner therein
specified, and in all respects according to their true'intent and meaning, and shall
idemnify and save harmless the County of Riverside, its officers, agents and employees,
as therein stipulated, then this obligation s~all become null and void; otherwise it
shall be and remain in full force and effect.
As a part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition to the face amount specified
therefore, there shall be included costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including
reasonable attorney's fees, incurred by County in successfully enforcing such obligation,
a~'to be taxed as costs and included in any judgement rendered.
284-44-1 11/87
The Surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteratibn
or addition to the terms of the Agreement or to the work to be performed thereunder or-
the specifications accompanying the same shall in any way affect its obligation
this bond, and it does-hereby waive-notice of any such change, extension of time, alteratioh
or addition to the terms of the Agreement or to the work or to the specifications.
Surety further stipulates and agrees that the provisions of Section 2845 of the Civil
Code are not a condition precedent to the Surety's obligations hereunder and are hereby,
waived by the Surety.
When the work covered by the Agreement is complete and the final planting inspection
has been approved by the Building Director, the amount of the obligation of this bond
'is reduced by 90% with the remaining 10% held.as security until the structure is occupie~l.
In witness whereof, this instrument has been duly executed by the Principal and Surety
above named on August 23rd, 1989 ·
NAME OF PRINCIPAL: .'TayCo (Joint venture of Taylor Woodrow Homes & Costain Homes Inc.)
3991 Ha ewpo eac C
AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE (S): By
· rd'Pop Vic re~ 1 t. Title
or ..:oodrow
David B. Jackson~:e President Costain HomesTitle
Title
NAME OF SURETY:
AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE:
(If Corporation, Affix Seal)
~American Home Assurance Company 3 Embarcadero Center, San Francisco,
Re s 11 - ney In-Fact Title
(If Corporation, Affix Seal)
ATTACH NOTORIAL ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF SIGNATURE OF PRINCIPAL AND ATTORNEY-IN-FACT
Ar. ef~an Home Assurance Company
"t~lational Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa.
PelACI~II IIIm~ Office; 70 PIM Stemel. Ne,v Y~fko N.Y. 10270
POWER OF A1TFORNEY
No. 03-B-OlO01
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESEPRESENlI:
That American Home Assurance Company, i New York corporation. and National Union Fire Insuranc~ Company of Pittsburgh, PI..
a Pennsylvania corporation, does each hereby appoint
---Pieere LeCompCe, N. O~ens, Renee G, Basse11: of San Francisco, Cal:i:focnia---
its true and lawful Attcxney(s)-in-Fact. with full authority to execute on its behalf bonds, undertakings. recognizances and other
contracts of indemnity and writings obligatory in the nature thereof, issued in the coune of its busineu, and to bind the respective
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, American Home Assurance Company and National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa.
have each executed these presents
~ ~ (~ this i day of Hay
Edwtrd J. French, Vice
President
. E OF NEW YORK ~.
Cu~JNTY OF NEW YORK }
· . /
o- ~ 6 -~v d HaY ' .
~f~ ~d ~ ~ ~kn~-~t ~ ~ ~e- ~. 03-475~3
State of C~iifo~ia
County of San Francisco
SS.
,&A-(X.
AEO (5/8~) 1M
l~l~!T ' 1' Tfl!lHIillllllllllllllllllllll'eeeeett*eber
OFFICIAL SEAL
N. OWENS
N0~ARY PUBLIC- CAUF0~NIA
= My ~ enxres May t5,
~"181111111 II I I Ill Ilelllllflllllllletllll$1eltlelleNlle$le
T'3:~4~ tQIR~I
On August 23rd, 1989
· before me, the undersigned,
a Notary Public of said county and state· personally appeared
Renee G. Bassel l
and personally known to me to be the Attorney-in-Fact o~
American Home Assurance Company _
the Corporation that executed the within instrument, and known to
me to be the person who executed the said instrument on behalf of
the Corporalion therein named, and acknowledged to me that such
Corporation executed the same.
NOTARY PUBLIC
Maurten P. Tully, Secretary
CITY' OF TEMECULA
EROSION CONTROL, LANDSCAPE AND IRRIC.~TION
FAITHFUL PERFORMAN(:~ BOND 3SM 802 562 00
........ Premium: $330.00/2~
WHEREAS. the City of Temecula, State of California, and
Coscain Homes, Inc. (herelnafter designated as "Principal")
have entered into an agreement whereby Principal agrees to install and
complete ce~ain designated
agreement, dated
Erosion Control, Landscape &
Irrigation Tract No. 22915-2
made a part hereof: and
public improvements, which said
· 19 , and Identified as Project
· is hereby referred to and
TCSD
WHEREAS, Principal is required under the terms of the
agreement to furnlah a bond for the Feltkfful Performance of the
agreement: American Motorists
NOW, THEREFORE, we the Principal and Insurance ComDany
aa surety, are held and firmly bound unto the City of Temecula,
California. in the penal sum of $ 22,000.00 , lawful money of the
Twenty two thousand and no/100
United Steter~. for the payment of such sum well and truly to be made,
we bind ourselves, our heirs, suct. essors, executors and
administrators, jointly and severally.
The condition of this obligation Is such that the obligation
shell become null and void if the above-bounded Principal, his or its
heirs, executors. administrators, successors. or assigns, shall in all
things stand to, abide by. wall and truly keep, and perform the
covenants, conditions. and provisions in the agreement and any
alteration thereof made as therein pr.~.vidad, on his or their pa~t, to be
FORMS\F, NG7
kept and performed at the time and in the manner therein specified, and
in all respects according to his or their true intent and meaning, and
shall indemnify and save harmless the City of Temecula, Its officers,
agents; ~nd employeeS, as therein stipulated: otherwise, this obligation
shall be end remain in full force end effect.
As a part of the obligation secured hereby end in addition
to the face amount specified therefor, there shall be included costs and
reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable ettarneyes fees,
incurred by City in Successfully enforcing such obligation, all to be
taxed as coats and Included in any .judgment rendered,
The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change,
extension err tim, alteration or addition to the terrm~ of the ~greement
or to the work to be performed thereunder or the specifications
accompanying the sam shall in any way affect its obligations on this
bond, and It does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension
of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the agreement or to the
work or to the specifications.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Instrument has been duly
executed by the Principal and Surety abovenenH~d, on Ma~v/4, .
19 94.
( Seat ) ( Seal )
FO~\E]',IG7
Company
Kipton Keller, Attorney In Fact
| Name )
By:
PRINCIPAL CosCain Homes,
{ Name)
( Title }
( '1 iris }
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
$CO'1 T P · Fi ELD
City Attorney
FORMS\ENG7
A/~RKICAN MOTOETSTS INST/KANCE COMPANY
H~ ~ ~fAce: Long Gr~ve# XL 600~,9
Pb~E~ OF ATTOENEY
Know All Men By These Presen{s~"
That the Americmn No,otters Insulate Cos~my, a co~s,i~ or~mnized m~d existing u~der ,be lm~s o4 ,~e State o4
Illinois, m~d ~mving its principal office in Lq Greve, Illinois# does be.shy se~oint
Kipton Keller of Los Angeles, California ~AAAA,AAAAA**
its t~ue and lawful mgen,(s) 8rid mt~orney(s)-in-fac*. ,o' .eke. execu,e. el# and deliver ~riq {~ Hri~
begi~i~ wi~h ~ ~e of is~ of ~his ~ ~ ~i~ ~r 31, 19~, ~less s~r ~v~ fo~ ~ ~
~lf as ~y. ~ as i~s ~* ~ ~:
~y ~d all ~ds ~d ~de~ak~s r~id~ the amour
of no one b~d or ~de~ak~ uce~s ~0 HI~ION FI~
~n THOUS~ D0~-~-~S ($2,500,000.00)~AA~A~A~*
~is au,bo~i*~ ~s ~{ ~it ~ ~ ~li~i~ *o ~ ~1i{ into *~ o. ~ ~S in o~ ~o b~i~ ~ su~
b~d within *~ dollm~ limit o~ ~,~i*~ ms ~{ ~o~{h ~ein.
T~is ~i~, ~ ~ ~v~ st m~ ,ira b~ ,~ ~i~ ~,o~is,s I.~ ~.
~ execu, i~ o~ s~ ~s ~ ~,~i~s in ~~ ~ *~ 'p~eMn, s ~11 ~ ss bi~in9 ~ *~ uid
~ica~ ~o,o~is~s I~su~ C~ ms ~ull~ ~ sl~ ,o ~11 in,~,s ~ ~us, as if ,~ m ~ ~ ~1~
exe~,ed ~d ~led~ b~ i~s ~lm~l~ elec,ed o~i~s m, l,s p~i~ip.1 o~i~ in L~ G~ve, Illi~is.
THIS AP~I~[~ S~L C~AS~ ~ T[~I~T~ WIT~ NO~C~ ~ OW D[C~R S1; 19~.
.o~s o~ Rid ~ic~ ~,o~is,s Insu~e C~ ~ Fe~ ~, 19~ at L~ G~ve, I11i~is, m
being i~ ~ull ~o~e ~ e~*:
~0T[D~ ~ ~be C~i~ o~ ~ Boa~, *~ P~si~{, o~ ~ Vice P~si~t, o. t~i. ~in~s desi~t~ in
~e,o, bonds ~d ~,~i~gs~ ~Eo~i~s~ c~,~E~s o~ i~i*~ ~ o*~ w~i,i~s, obliga*o~ i~ *~ ~,u~e
~be~eof, a~d ~ suc~ o{{ice~s o~ *~ C~W ~W ~i~ W,s ~o~ Ecep{~ of p~ess."
held ~ ,~e ~ da~ o~/eb~ 19~:
~esolu, i~ R~,ed b~ *~ ex~,ive ~i**~ o~ ,~ ~s~d o~ Di~c,o~s ~ [~ 2S, 19~ ~ ~W ~ ~ so
ex~ sealed ~ ce~i~i~ wi,b ~* ~o m~ ~ o~ ~,~i~ ,o ~i~ it is s**~,. ~11 ~,iu ,o ~
valid a~ bi~i~g ~ *~ ~-"
co~a,e seal ,o ~ s~fix~ b~ i,s ~,~iz~ o~i~s~ ,his 01 ~ o~ ~ · 19~ ·
Attested and Certified:
F :CuZlough. Secretary
AHERICAN HOTORZSTS INSURANCE COHPAJ~Y
J .S.Kemper,l~II,Sen~lor'~Vl:e~PrTsi~t
:OYEX)
STATE OF ZLLZNOZS SS
COUNTY OF LAKE
Z, Hmrilyn L. Riley, a Notary Publio# do hereby certify thet J. S. Kemp·r, Ill and F. C. HcCull~ugh personBlly kzMmwn
to me to be the same persons whose names ari rmspe~tively as Senior Vice President and Secretary of the American .'
Hotorists Insurance CosWamny# · COrporation of the State of Illinois# subscribed to the foP·going instrument,
appeared before me this day in person end sevwral~.,/~ckn~wlwdgwt that they being thereunto duly authorized signed,
sealed with the corporllte ml and delivered the said instrument ms the free end voluntary ect of s~id corporation
and as their own free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes therein set forth.
My omission ewpires: 6-9-9&
"OFFICIAL SEAL"
Marilyn L Riley
Notat'/Public. State 0f Illinois
My Cemmiumn Ex~es 419196
CERTIFICATION
l, N. J. Zernda, Secretary of the American Hotorists Znsurmn¢~ Company, do hereby certify thet the attBched Power
of Attorney dated January 1, 199~ on b~lf of the person(s) ms listed on the reverse side is a
true and correct copy and thet the same h~s been in full force and effect since the date thereof and is in full
force and effect on the date of this certificate; and Z do further certify that the said J. S. Kemp·r, TZZ and F
HcCullough who executed the Power of Attorney ms Senior Vice President and Secretary respectively were on the da
of the execution of the attached Power of Attorney the duly elected Senior Vice President and Secretary of the
AmericBl~ HoboPiers Insurance CoBpany.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, T have hereunto subscribed my nBme 8rid affixed the torpor·t· weB1 of the American
Ho,oris~s Insurance Compar~y off this day of }'v~=[~'~! ~. .... , 19
N.J.Zsrsdm, Secretsty
This Power of Attorney limits the acts of those named therein to the bonds and underimkings specifically named
therein, end they have no authority to bind the Company excePt in the manner end to the extent her·in stated.
FH 836=~ 6-92 1H
Power of Attorney - Term
PRZNTED ZN U.S.A.
-- - CITY OF T~MECULA
PARKLAND / LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENT AGREEM~Vr
DATE OF AGR~A'MENT:
May 6, 1994
NAME OF SUBDIVIDER: Cosrain Homes
(Rcfcrred toas"SUBDIVIDER')
NAME OF SUBDMSION: vintage Hills
(Rcfcrred toas"SUBDIVIDER")
TRACT NO.: 22915-2
TENTATIVE MAP RESOLUTION
OF APPROVAL NO.: 22915-2
(Rcf~rr~ to as "Re,solution of Approval")
PARKIAND IMPROVEMENT PLANS NO.:
(Referred to as "Resolution of Approval")
ESTIMATED TOTAL COST OF PARKlAND IMPROVEMFiNTS: $ complete
COMPLETIONDATE: Schedule for acceptance July 1994
NA1VIE..OF SURETY AND BOND NO. FOR LABOR AND MATERIALS BOND:
7
NAME OF SURETY AND BOND NO. FOR FMTItFUL PERFORMANCE BOND:
American Motorists InSurance Company
3SH 802 563 00
NAME OF SURETY AND BOND NO. FOR WARRANTY BOND:
~le: R:~enndfM, mm'wd~mg
._
This Agreement is made and entered into by and between the City of Temecula,
C~Hfomia, a Municipal Corporation of the State of C~Hfomia, heroinafter referred to as CITY,
and the SUBDIVIDER.
RECITALS
A. SUBDIVIDER has presented to CITY for approval and recordation, a final
subdivision map of a proposed subdivision pursuant to provisions of the Subdivision Map Act
of the State of C. lifomia and the CITY ordinances and regulations relating to the ftl.ing,
approval and recordat. ion of subdivision maps. Th~ Subdivision Map Act and the CITY
ordinances and regulations relating to the fH.ing, approval and recordation of subdivision maps
are collectively referred to in this A~.,ement as the "Subdivision I.aws."
B. A tentative map of the SUBDIVISION has been approve. d, subject to 'the
Subdivision Laws and to the requirements and conditions contained in the Resolution of
Approval. The Resolution of Approval is on f~e in the Office of the City Clerk and is
incorporated into this A~oTe, ement by reference.
C. SUBDIVIDER is required as a condition of the approval of the tentative map that
the Parkland Improvement plans must be completed, in compliance with City standards, by .the
Completion Date. The Subdivision Laws establish as a condition precedent to the approval of'
a final map, that the SUBDIVIDER has entered into a secured Agreement with the CITY to
complete the Parkland/Landscape Improvement Plans within the Completion Date.
D. In consideration of approval of a final map for the SUBDIVISION by the City
Council, SUBDIVIDER desires to enter into this A~.ement, whereby promises to install and
complete, at SUBDIVIDER'S own expense, all the ParklandfLandscape Improvement work
required by City in connection with proposed subdivision. Subdivider has secured this
a~eement by Parkland/Landscaping Improvement Security required by the Subdivision Laws
F&lee: I~:%(:;orv~elrU, K~clecpeg :~
and approved by the City Attorney. The term "l:'arkland* includes landscape ms intended to
be maintnlned by the Temecula Community Services District.
E. Complete Parkland/Tnndscape Improvement Plans forthe construction, installation
and completion of the Parkland Improvements have been pr~ax~ by SUBDIVIDER and
appmved by the Director of Community Services. The ParEand Improvement Plans numbered
as referenced previously in this Agreement are On f'~e in the Office-of the Director of
Community Services and are incorporated into this Agreement by this reference. All references
in this Agreement to the' Parkland ImproVement plnn.~ shall include reference to any
specifications for the Improvements as appmved by the Director of Community Services.
F. An estimate of the cost for construction of the ParHand Improvements according
to the Improvement Plans has been made and appmved by the Director of Community Services.
The estimated mount is stated on Page 1 of this Agreement.
attached as Exhibit "A" to this Agreement.
The basis for the estimate is
G. The CITY has adopted standards for the construction and installation of
Parkland/Landscape Improvements within the CITY. The Parkland/Landscape Improvement
Plans have been prepaa;.ed in conformante. with the CITY standards, (in effect. on the date of
approval of the Resolution' of Approval).
H. SUBDIVIDER recognizes that by approval of the final map for SUBDMSION,
CITY has conferred substantial fights upon SUBDIVIDER, including the right to sen, lease, or
finance lots within the SU'BDM SION, and has taken the final act necessary to subdivide the
property within the SUBDMSION. As a result, CITY will be damaged to the extent of the cost
of installation of the Parklandfr ~ndscape Improvements by SUBDIVIDER'S failure to peffom
its obligations under this Agreement, including, but not limited to, SUBDIVIDER'S obligation
to complete construction of Parkland/Landscape Improvements by the Completion Date. CITY
shall be enti~ed to all remedies available to it pursuant to this Agreement and the Subdivision
Laws in the event of a default by SUBDIVIDER. It is specifically recognized that the
determination of whether a reversion to acreage or rescission of the SUBDM SION constitutes
an adequate remedy for default by the SUBDIVIDER shall be within the sole discretion of
NOW, TI-~R~'gORE, in consideration of the approval and recordation by the City
Council of the final map of the SUBDM SION, SUBDIVIDER and CITY agree as follows;
1. SUBDIVIDER'S Obligations to Construct Parkland/I.andscape Improvements.
SUBDIVIDER Shall:
Comply with all the requirements of the Resolution of Approval,
amendments thereto, and with the provisions of the Subdivision
a,
and any
Laws.
b.
Complete by the time established in Section 20 of this A~r~ment
and at SUBDIVIDER'S own expense, all the Parkland/Landscape Improvement
Work required on the Tentative Map and Resolution of Approval in conformartce
with the Parkland Improvement Plans and the CITY standards:
c. Fumish the necessary materials for completion of the Parkland
Improvements in conformity with the Parkland Improvement Plans and CITY
standards.
d. ' Except for easements or other interests in real property to be
dedicated to the homeowners associaU.'on of the SUBDM SION, acquire
and dedicate, or pay the cost of acquisition by CITY, of all fights-of-way,
easements and other interests in real property for construction or installation of
the Parkland/Landscape Improvements, free and clear of all liens and
encumbrances for the SUBDIVIDER'S obljg'ations with regani to acquisition by
CITY of off-site rights-of-way, easements and other interests in real property
shall be subjezt to a separate Agr~ment between SUBDIVIDER and CITY.
2. Acquisition and De~dication of E~sements or Rights-of-Way. If any of the
ParldandILandscap~ Improvements and land development work contemplated by this Agr~ment
are to be constructed or installexi on l~and not ownexi by SUBDIVIDER, no construction or
installation shall be commence~l before:
a. The offer of de~licafi0n to CITY or appropriam rights-of-way,
easements or other interest in real property, and appropriate authorization from
the property owner to allow construction or installation Of the Improvements or
" wOrl(, or
b. The dexiicafion to, and acceptance by, the CITY of appropriate
rights-of-way, easements or other interests in real property, and approvexi by the
Department of Public Works, as detennined by the Director of Community
Services.
c. The issuance by a court of competent jurisdiction pursuant to the
State Eminent. Domain Law of an order of possession. SUBDrV~ER shall
comply in all respects with order of possession.
Nothing in this Section 2 shall be construed as authorizing or g-ranting an extension of time to
SUBDIVIDER.
3. Security. SUBDIVIDER shall at all times ~tarantee SUBDIVIDER'S
performance of tills Agreement by funfishing to CrrY, and maintaining, good and sufficient
security as required by the Subdivision Laws on forms' approved by CITY for the purposes and
in the mounts as follows:
a. to assure faithful l~rformancb of this Agr~ment in regard to said
improvements in and mount of 100% of the estimatexl cost of the
Parkland/l'~ndscape Improvements; and
b. to s~cure payment to any contractor, subcontractor, persons renting
equipment, or furnishing labor materials for Parldand/I andscape Improvements
required to be constructed or installed pursuant to this Agreement in the additional
mount of 50 % of the estimated cost of the Improvements; and
c. - ' to guarantee or warranty the work done pursuant to this Agreement
for a period of one year following acceptance thereof by crrY against any
defective work or labor done or defective materials furnished in the additional
mount of 10 % of the estimated cost of the Parkland Improvements.
The securities required by this Ageement shall be kept on f~e with the City Clerk. The terms
of the security documents referenced on Page 1 of this Agreement am incorporated into this
Agreement by this Reference. If any security is replaced by another approved security, the
replacement shall be filed with the City Clerk and, upon filing, shall be deemed to have been
made a part of and incorporated into this Agreement. Upon filing of a replacement security with
the City Clerk, the former security may be released.
4. Alterations to Parkland Improvement Plans.
a. Any changes, alterations or additions to the Parkland/Landscape
Improvement Plans and specifications or to the improvements, not exceeding 10 %
of the original estimated cost if the improvement, which are mutually a~omexl upon
by the CITY and SUBDIVIDER, shall not relieve the improvement security given
for faithful performance of this Agr~ment. In the event such changes,
alterations, or additions exceed 10% of the original estimated cost of the
~le: R:%ConndrU,~ndscp4~ (~
improvement, SUBDIVIDER shall provide improvement security for faithful
performance as requir~ by Paragraph 3 of this Agreement for 100 % of the total
estimated cost of the improvement as changed, altered, or mended, minus any
completed partial releases allowed by Pangraph 6 of this A~oTeement.
b. The SUBDIVIDER shall construct the Parkland Improvements in
accordance with the ~ Standards in effect at the time of adoption of the
Resolution of Approval. CITY reserves the right to modify the standards
applicable to the SUBDM SION and this Agreement, when necessary to protect
the public health, safety or welfare or comply with applicable State or federal law
or CITY zoning ordinances. If SUBDIVIDER requests and is .granted an
extension of time for completion of the improvements, CITY may apply the
standards in effect at the time of the extension.
Inspection and Maintenance Period.
a. SUBDIVIDER shall obtain City inspection of the
Parkland/Landscape Improvements in accordance with the City standards in effect
at the time of adoption of the Resolution of Approval. SUBDIVIDER shall at all
times maintain proper facilities and 'safe access for li~'lspection of the Parkland
Improvements by CITY inspectors and to the shops wherein any work is in
preparation.. Upon Completion of the work the SUBDIVIDER may request a
final inspection by the Director of Community Services, or the Director of
Community Service's authorized representative. If the Director of Community
Services, or the designated representative, determine that the work has been
Completed in accordance with this Agreement, then the Director of Community
Services shall certify the completion of the Parkland/Landscape Improvements to
the Board of Dir~tors.
b. SUBDIVIDER shall con~uue to maintain the Parkland/Landscape
Improvements for uinety (90) days after they have been certified completed. No
improvements shall be Finally accepted unless the maintenance period has expired,
and all aspects of the work have been inspected and determined to have been
completed in accordance with the P-arldand/Landscape Improvement Plans and
crrY standards.
certification.
Release of Securities.
SUBDIVIDER'shall bear all costs of inspection and
Subject to approval by the Board of Directors of the
Community Services-District of the CITY, the securities required by this Agreement shall be
released as follows:
a. Security given for faithful performance of any act, obligation, work
or Agreement shall be released upon the expiration of the maintenance period and
the final completion and acceptance of the act or work, subject to the provisions
of subsection (b) hereof.
b. The Director of COmmUnity Services may release a portion of the
security given for faithful performance of improvement work as the Parkland
Improvement progresses upon application therefore by the SUBDIVIDER;
provided, however, that no such release shall be for an mount less that 25 % of
the total Parkland Improvement Security given for faithful performance of the
..
improvement work and that the security shall not be reduced to an mount less
than 50 % of the total Landscape/Parkland Improvement Security given for faithful
performance until expiration of the maintenance period and final completion and
I~le: R:~.Conn$1r~J, ar~$c~ ' 8
accc-ptancc of the impwvement work. In no event shall the Director of
Community Services authorize a release of the Parkland/Landscape Improvement
Security which would reduce such security to an mount below that required to
guarantee the completion of the improvement work and any other obligation
imposed by this Agreement.
c. Security given to'secure payment to the contractor, his or her
subcontractors and to persons furnishing hbor, materl. J-~ or equipment shall, six
months after the completion and acceptance of the work, be reduced to an mount
equal to the Wtal claimed by all claimants for whom lien have been filed and of
which notice has been given to the legislative body, plus an mount reasonably
determined by the Director of Community Services to be required to assure the
performance of any other obli~tions secured by the Security. The balance of the
security shall be released upon the settlement of all claims and obligations for
which the security was given.
d. No security given for the guarantee or warranty of work shall be
released until the expiration of the warranty period and until any claims fried
during the warranty period have been settled. As pro~,,ided in paragraph 10, the
warranty period shall not commence until final acceptance of all work and
improv.ements by the City Council.
e. The CITY may retain from any security released, and araount
sufficient to cover costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable
attorneys' fees.
File:
7. Injury to Public Improvements, Public Property or Public Utilities Facilities.
SUBDIVIDER shall rtrplace or have r~placed, or repair or have repaired, as the case may
all public improvements, public utilities facilities and surveying or subdivision monuments which
are destroyed or damaged or destroyed by r~ason of any work done under this Agreement.
SUBDIVIDER shall bear the entixe cost of rerplacment or repairs of any and all public property
on public utility property damaged or destroyed by reason of any work done. Under this
agreement whether such property is owned by the United States or any agency thereof, or the
State of CMifornia, or any agency or political subdivision thereof, or by the CITY or any public
or private utility corporation or by any combination or such owners. Any repair or replacement
shall be to the satisfaction, and subjeL't to the approval, of the City Engineer.
8. Permits. SUBDIVIDE shall, at SUBDIVIDER"S expense', obtain all necessary
permits and licenses for the construction and installation of the improvements, give all necessary
notices and pay all fees and taxes rexluh'cd bY law.
9. Default of SUBDIVIDER.
a. Default of SUBDIVIDER shall include, but not be limited to,
SUBDIVIDER'S failur~ to timely commence construction pursuant to this
Agreement; SUBDIVIDER'S failure to timely complete construction of the
Parkland/Landscapc Improvements; SUBDIVII)ER'S failur~ to timcly cure any
defect in the Parkland/Landscape Improvements; SUBDIVIIDER'S failure to
perform shbsmntial construction work for a period of 20 calendar days after
commencement of the work; SUBDIVIDER'S insolvency, appointment of a
receiver, or the filing of any petition in bankruptcy either voluntary or
involuntary which SUBDIVIDER fails to discharge within thirty (30) days; the
commencement of a foreclosure action against the SUBDM SION or a portion
thereof, or any conveyance in 'lieu or in avoidance of foreclosure; or
SUBDIVIDER's failure to pcfform any other obligation under this Agrecment.
b. The CITY reserves to itself all remedies available to it at law or
in equity for breach of SUBDIVIDER's obligations under this Agreement. The
CITY shall have the fight, subject to this section, to draw upon or utilize the
appropriate security to mitigate CYFY damages in event of default by
SUBDIVIDER. The right of CITY to draw upon or utifi~c the security is
additional to and not in lieu of any other remedy available to CITY. It is
specifxcaJly reco,,,mjtzed that the estimated costs and security mounts may not
reflect the actual cost of construction or installation of Parkland/Landscape
Improvements and, therefore, CITY damages for SUBDIVIDER'S default shall
be measured by the cost of completing the required improvements. The sums
provided by the improvement security may be used by CITY for the completion
of the Parkland/Landscape Improvements in accordance with the
Parkland/Landscape Improvement Plans and specifications contained herein.
In the event of SUBDIVIDER'S default under this Agreement, SUBDIVIDER
authorizes CITY to perform such obligation twenty days after mailing written
notice of default to SUBDIVIDER and to SUBDIVIDER'S Surety, and agTees to
pay the entire cost of such performance by CITY.
CITY may take over the work and prosecute the same to completion, by contract
or by any other method CITY may ~leem advisable, for the account and at the
expense of SUBDIVIDER, and SUBDIVIDER'S Surety shall be liable to CITY
for any excess cost or damages occasioned CITY thereby; and, in such evcnt,
CITY, without liability for so doing, may take possession of, and utilize in
completing the work, such materials, appliance,s, plant and other property
belonging to SUBDIVIDER as may be on the site of the work and necessary for
performance of the work.
c. Failure of SUBDIVIDER to comply with the terms of this
Agreement shall constitute consent to the fding by CITY of a notice of violation
against all the lots in the SUBDM SION, or to rescind the approval or otherwise
revert the SUBDIVISION to acreage. The remedy provided by this Subsection
C is in addition to and not in lleu of other remedies available to CITY.
SUBDIVIDER agrees that the choice of remedy or remedies for SUBDIVIDER'S
breach shall be in the discretion of CITY.
d. -- In the event that SUBDIVIDER fails to perform any obligation
hereunder, SUBDIVIDER agrees to pay all costs and expenses incurred by CITY
in securing performance of such obligations, including costs of suit and
reasonable attomey's fees.
e. The failure of CITY to take an enforcement action with respect to
a default, or to declare a breach, shall not be construed as a waiver of that default
or breach or any subsequent .default or breach of SUBDIVIDER.
10. Warranty. SUBDIVIDER shall guarante, c or warranty the work done pursuant
to this A~ccment for a period of one year after expiration of the maintenance period and final
acceptance by the City Council of the work and improvements against any defective work or
labor done or defective mater~ak furnished. Where Parkland/Landscape Improvements am to
..
be constructed in phases or sections, the one year warranty period shall commence after City
acceptance of the last completed improvement. If within the warranty period any work or
improvement or part of any work or improvement done, furnished, installed, constructed or
caused to tl done, furnished, installed or constructed by SUBDIVIDER fails to fulfill any of the
requirements of this Agreement or the l:'arldandfr~ndscape Improvement Plans and specifications
referred to heroin, SUBDIVIDER shall without delay and without any cost to CITY, r~air or
replace or reconstruct any defective or otherwise unsatisfactory part or parts of the work or
structure. Should SUBDIVIDER fail to act promptly or in accordance with this requirement,
SIIBDIVIDIi~ hereby authorizes CITY, at CITY option, 'to perform the work twenty days after
mailing written notice of default to SUBDIVIDER and to SUBDIVIDER's Surety and agrees to
pay the cost of such work by CITY. Should CITY determine that an urgency requires repairs
or replacements to be made before SUBD IDER can be notified, crrY may, in its sole
discretion, make the necessary r~pairs or x~lacements or perform the nect~sary work and
SUBDIVIDER shall pay to CITY the cost of such repairs. - .-
11. SUBDIVIDER Not Agent of CITY. Neither SUBDIVIDER nor any of
SUBDIVIDER'S agents or contractors are or shall be considered to be agents of CITY in
connection with the performance of SUBDIVIDER'S obligations under this Agreement.
12. Injury to Work. Until such time as the Parkland/Landscape Improvements
are accepted by CITY, SUBDIVIDER shall be responsible for and bear the risk of loss to any
of the '.hmprovements constructed or installed. CITY shall not, nor shall any officer or employee -
thereof, be liable or responsible for any accident, loss or damage, regardless of cause, happening
or occurring to the work or improvements specified in this Agreement prior to the completion
and acceptance of the work or improvements. All such risks shall be the responsibility of and
are hereby assumed by SUBDIVIDER.
13. Other AgTeements. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall preclude CITY
from expending monies pursuant to agreements concun'ently or previously executed between the
parties, or from entering into agreement with other subdividers for the apportionment of costs
of water and sewer mains, or other improvements, pursuant to the provisions of the CITY
ordinances providing therefore, nor shall anything in this Agreement commit CITY to any such
apportionment.
14. SUBDIVIDER'S Obligation to Warn Public During Construction. Until final
acceptance of the Parkland Improvements, SUBDIVIDER shall give good and adequate warning
to the public of each and every dangerous condition existent in said improvements, and will take
all reasonable actions to protect the public from such dangerous condition.
15. Vesting of Ownership. UpOn acceptance of work on behalf of CITY and
recordation of the Notice of Completion, ownership of the improvements constructed pursuant
to this Agreement shall vest in CITY.
16. l=inal Acceptance of Work. Acceptance of the work on behalf of CITY shall be
made by the City Council upon recommendation of the Director of Community Services after
final completion and inspection of all Parkland/Landscape Improvements. The Board of
Directors shall act upon the Director of Community Services recommendations .within thirty (30)
days from the date the Director of Community Services certifies that the work has finally
completed, as provided in Para~oraph 5. Such acceptance shall not constitute a waiver of defects
by CITY.
17. Indemnity/Hold Harmless. CITY or any officer or employee thereof shall not
be liable for any injury to persons or property occasioned by reason of the acts or omissions of
SUBDIVIDER, its agent-~ or employees in the performance of this Agreement. SUBDIVIDER
further agrees to protect and hold harmless CITY, its officials and employees from any and all
claims, demands, causes of action, liability or loss of any son, because of, or a_rising out of, acts
or omissions or SUBDIVIDER, its agents or employees in the 'performance of this Agreement,
including all claims, demands, causes of action, liability, or loss because of, or arising out of,
in whole or in part, the design or construction of the Parldand/Lands~ape Improvements. This
indemnification and Agreement to hold harmless shall extend to injuries to persons and damages
or taking of property resulting from the design or construction of the Parkland/Landscape
Improvements as provided herein, and in addition, to adjacent property owners as a consequence
of the diversion of waters from the design or construction of public drainage systems, streets and
other public improvements. Acceptance of any of the Parkland/Landscape ImproVements shall
not constitute any assumption by the CITY of any responsibility for any damage or taking
covered by this paragraph. CITY shall not b~ ~ponsible for the design or construction of the
Parkland/Landscape Improvements pursuant to the approved Parkland/Landscape Improvement
Plans, regardless of any negligent action or inaction taken by the CITY in approving the plans,
unless the particular improvement design was specifically required by CITY over written
objection by SUBDIVIDER submitted to the Director of Community Services before approval
of the particular improvement design, which objection indicated that the particular improvement
design was dangerous or defective and suggested an alternative safe and feasible design. After
acceptance of the Parkland/Landscape Improvements, the SUBDIVIDER shall remain obligated
to eliminate any defect in design or dangerous condition caused by the design or construction
defect, however, SUBDIVIDER shall not be responsible for routine maintenance. 'Provisions
of tl~s paragraph shall remain in full force and effect for ten years following the acceptance by
the CITY of Parkland/Landscape Improvements. It is the intent of this section that
SUBDIVIDER shall be responsible for all liability for design and construction of the
Parkland/Landscape Improvements installed or work done pursuant to this Agreement and that
CITY shall not be liable for any negligence, nonfeasance, misfeasance or malfeasance in
approving, reviewing, checking, or correcting any plans or specifications or in approving,
reviewing or inspecting any work or construction. The improvement security shall not be
required to cover the provision of this paragraph.-
18. Sale or Disposition of SUBDMSION. Sale or other disposition of this property
will not relieve' SUBDIVIDER from the obligations set forth heroin. If SUBDIVIDER sells the
property or any portion of thc property within the SUBDM SION to any other person, the
SUBDIVIDER may request a novation of thi.~ Agreement and a substitution of security. Upon
approval of the novation and substitution of securities, the SUBDIVIDER may request a release
or reduction of the securities required by this Agreement. Nothing in the rioration shall relieve
the SUBDIVIDER of the obligations undcr Paragraph 17 for the work or improvcmcnt done by
SUBDIVIDER.
19.
· 20.
Time of the Essence. Time is of the essence of this Agreement.
Time for Completion of Work Extensions. SUBDIVIDER shall
complete
construction of the improvements required by this Agreement no later than
· In the event good cause exists as determined by the City Engineer, and if otherwise
permitted under the tentative map condition, the time for completion of the improvements
hereunder may be extended. The extension shall be made by writing executed by the Director
of Community Services. Any such extension may be granted without notice to SUBDIVIDER'S
'Surety and shall not affect the validity of this Agreement or release the Surety or Sureties on any
security given for this Agreement. The Director of Community Services shall be the sole and
final judge as to whether or not good cause has been shown to entitle SUBDIVIDER to an
extension. Delay, other.than delay in the commencement of work, resulting from an act of
CITY, or by an act of God, which SUBDIVIDER could not have reasonably foreseen, or by
storm or inclement,weather which prevents the conducting of work, or by strikes, boycotts,
similar actions by employees or labor organiTations, which prevent the conducting or work, and
which were not caused by or contributed to by SUBDBrIDER, shall constitute good cause for
an extension of time for completion. As a condition of such extension, the Director of
Community Services may require SUBDIVI/DER to furnish new security guaranteehag
performance of this Agreement as extended in an increased mount as necessary to compensate
for any increase in construction costs as determined by the Dim:tot of Community Services.
21. No Vesting of Rights. 'l~erfomance by SUBDIVIDER of this Agreement
shall not be construed to vest SUBDIVIDER'S rights with respect to any change in any change
in any zoning or building hw or ordinance.
22. Notices. All notices required or provided for under this Agreement shall be
in writing and delivered in person or sent by mail, postage prepaid and addressed as provided
ha this Section. Notice shall be effective on the date it is deliver~i in person, or, if mailed, on
the date of deposit in the United States Mail. Notices shall be'addressed as follows unless a
written change of address is filed with the City:
Notice to CITY:
City Clerk
City of Temecula
43 174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California 92390
NotiCe to SUBDIVIDER:
Cosrain Homes Inc.
620 Newport Center DrY. re, Sui. te #400
Newport Beach, CA 92660
Attention: Susan Lindquj. st
23. Sevembility. The provisions of this ,~greement axe severable. If any portion of
this Agreement is-held invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder of the
Agreement shall remain in full.. force and effect unless mended or modified by the mutual
consent of the paxties.
24. Captions. The captions of this :~gr~ment are for convenlenc~ and r~ferencc
only and shall not def'me, explain, modi~, limit, exemplify, or aid in the interpretation,
25. Litigation or Arbitration. In the event that suit or arbitration is brought to
enforce the terms of this contract, the prevailing party shall be en~~ed to litigation costs and
reasonable attorncy's fees,
26, Incorporation of Recitals,
into the terms of this agreement.
27. Entir~ Agreement,
The reciml-~ to thi.~ agreement g hereby incorporated
This Agreement constitutes the entire Agreement of the
parties with respect to the subject matter. All modifications, amendments, or waivers of the
terms of this Agreement must be in writing and signed by the appropriate representative of the
parties. In the case of the CITY, the appropriate paxty shall be the City Manager.
IN WITNESS ~F, this Agreement is executed by CITY, by and through its Mayor.
CITY OF~
Vice President/Chief Financial Officer
By:
By:
Name: e ewc ·
Title: President & Chief Financial Officer
By: ~~~
Nallle: Brent C. Anderson
Ti~e:
Mayor
(Proper Notarization of SUBDIVIDBR'S signatnre
is required and shall bc attached)
A'ITr_.ST:
By:
June S. Greek
City Clerk
RECOMMENDED FOR-APPROVAL:
By:
Name:
City Engineer
By:
Name:
Director of Community Services
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Scott F. Field
City Attorney
19
EX}rmIT A
(A~ch the basii f6~' the estimate of the cost of improvements.)
TRACT NO. 22915-~
EROSION AND I-ANDSC, APE CSA
BOND NO. PIB00 11 474
In consideration of the premium charged, it is understood and agreed that:
Effective from the 31st day of December. 1993.
THE OBLIGEE'S NAME IS HEREBY CHANGED:
From: County of Riverside
To: City of Teme~ula
Provided, however, that the liability of the American Home Assurance Company under the attached
bond and under the atlaehed bond as changed by this rider shall not be cumulative.
Nothing herein contained shall be held to vary, waive, alter or extend any of the terms, conditions,
agreements or warranties of the undermentioned bond, other than as stated above.
Attached to and forming a part of Bond No. PB300 11 474 issued by the American Home Assurance
Company dated the 23rd day of Aueust 1989 on behalf of Tavco (joint venture of Taylor Woodrow
Homes and Cosrain Homes) and in favor of County of Riverside.
Signed this 31st day of March. 1994.
TAYCO,. a California general partnership
(Taylor Woodrow Homes California Limited,
a California Corporation and Taylor Woodrow
Real Estate. A California Corporation)
Pri c'~al ft'~e(~s/L...~
American Home Assurance Company
Surety
By: ~ f' ~
Brian E. Gagan, Attorney~
'Ame~canHome Assurance Company POWER OF ATI'ORNEY
National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa,
principal Bond Off}c=: 70 ~ Sifts, ~ York, N.Y. 10270 No. 0'3-B-01001
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:
That American Home AssutmRm ..C.~n_pany, · New yo_~.__et~poration, and National Union Ftrg lamamum C, ompany of- Pittsburgh, Pa., · Pcnns~ cotpc ..
does each hereby appoint
---Richard R. Hertzberg. N. Owens, Lisa Langdon, Brian E. Gagam of San Francisco, California--
its t~uc and lawful Attorney(s)=in-Fnet, with full autl'd:a'ity to e.:mcutc on its behalf bond~ undertak~ r~ and other contrac~ of indemnity and wfitin~
obligatory in the natut~ thereof, issm~ in the courg of irt businear, and to bind the t~ company thettby.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF. A~.ic~ ,o.~ A~=~ Com~y .nd Na,~.~ Uak= F~ h~a== Comn.ny ot Pimbu.gh~ P~ ha~ ~ ~.c~.ted
these proseate
this' 7=day ,19~. ;'
Mark e, agan, n. or Vi~ President
STATE OF NEW YORK }
COUNTY OF NEW YORK}as.
On this 7 day of Autmst ,1~__._1.
before mc came the abc, v~ ntma~l o~k:~r of ~c~n Home
~unncc ~m~ny ~d NI~ Umn ~ ip~u~ ~m~ny
of Pit~u~, P~ to m ~ ~ m ~ tM indMd~i and
officer d~ hc~in, ~ ~~ tMt M exited tM
fo~going ~t~mcnt a~ a~ t~ ~ of ~id
thereto by autho~W of h~ ~.
New Yc:zrt
CERTIFICATE
Excerpts of Resolutions adopted by the Boards of Dirrxtors of American ttome Assuranc~ Company and National Union trtr~ lnsuranc~ Company of Pittsburgh, Pa.
on May 18, 1976:
· RESOLVED, that the Cluirman of the Board, the Pr~aid~nt, or any Vice Pa~ident be, and ber~y is, authorized to appoint Attmeyr,-in-Fnct to t~.pres~nt and'
act for and on heMif of the Compmay to execute bonds, undemtkinga, recogniarua~ and otigr coatram of ind{mnity and writings obligatory in the nature thereof,
and to attach thereto the corpora'.' real of tbe Company, in the tranusction of its surety busincsg
· RESOLVED, that the signature ·nd sUestations of such offg~rs and the se..nl of fig Compuy my be ~q'tml to any such Po~r of Anomey or to -,,y certificate
relating thertto by facsimi~, tad any such Po.~r of Attorney or certificate hearing such fsesimil~ signature or facsimile seal
Company ,,then so affixed with rtspect to an~ bond, undertaking reoagnizanc~ or other contr,.ct of indemnity or writing obligatory in the nature therefor;
'RESOLVED, that any such Anongy-in-Fact delivering a se.c~tarial ctrtification tlut Ug foregoing resolutions still be in effect my itwa:rt in such o=rtification the
date there. of, tnid ate to 1~ not tnR:r than the date of delb,~ry thereof by such Attorn~n-F~et-'
I. F2izabeth M. Tuck, Secrettry of Angriam Home A~surance Company and of N·tion~l Union Ft~ lnsumnc= Company of Pittsburgh, Pa. do here.~ e=rtify that the
foRgoing excerpts of Rt:soiutio~ ulopt~l by the Bo. rds of Dir~ors of tlgg corporations, and rig Po.~rs of Anorney iasued porsumat thereto, m true and
correct, and that both the Resolutions and the Po,~r~ of Anormy ·re in full force ·nd
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hav~ hc~unto r~t my hand and affixed the flcaimi!e gll of each corporation
this 31stdayof March ,l!,
EliTabeth M. Tuck, Se, c~ctary
-
AGREEHENT
FOR EROSTON CONTROL AND LANDSCAPE TIiPROVEHENTS
(~int venture of Taylor Hood~ow Homes &/
This Agreement, made and entered into by and ~bc~,v~(~n t e County of Riverside, State /'
o al~for is, he etna tar cal]ed County, and
W/TNESSETH
FIRST: Contractor, for End tn consideration of the issuance of grading and ]~ndscaptng
months free the date this agreement ls executed, to perrom and ceeplete in a good and
workmanlike manner, all those erosion control, landscape and irrigation improvements
in accordance with those landscape and irrigation plans for the development of said
land dtvtston which have been approved by the County Building Director, and are on file
in the Offtce of the Riverside County Butldtng and Safety DeparU, ent and to do all work
1netdental thereto in accordance with the standards set forth in Riverside County Ordinance
No. 457, as ended, which are expressly made a part of this agreement. All of the
above required work shall be done under the inspection of and to the satisfaction of,
the County Butldtng Director, and shall not be.deemed complete until approval of the
final planting Inspection ts made by the Butldtng Director. Contractor further agrees
to maintain the above required improvements, following the approval of the final planting ·
InspectiOn, unttl the structure ts occupied and, during this period to restore, repair
or rep}Ece, to the satisfaction of the Building Director, any defective work or labor
done or defective matertais furnished. The estimated cost of said work and Improvements
ts the sum of One hLb~dred 13~nty-seven thousand. dollars
($127,000.00).
SECOND: Contractor agrees to pay to the County the actual cost of such inspection of
the works and improvements as may be required by the Building Oirector. Contractor
further agrees that if suit is brought upon this agreement or any bond guaranteeing
the completion of the landscape and irrigation improvements,-all costs and reasonable
expenses and fees incurred by the County in successfully enforcing such obligations
shall be patd by Contractors including reaso,able attorney's fees, and that upon entry
of judgment, such costs, expenses and fees shall be taxed as costs and included tn
any Judgment rendered.
284-44
'THIRD: County shall not, nor shall any officer or employee of County, be liable or
responsible for any accident, loss or damage happenings' occurring to the works specified
tn this agreement prior to the ceepletton and approval thereof, nor shall County or
any officer or employee thereof, be liable for any persons or property injured by reason
of the nature of the work, Or by reason of the acts or emissions of Contractor, his
agents or employees, in his perromance of the work, and all of said liabilities are
assumed by Contractor. Contractor agrees to protect, defend and hold harmless County
and the officers end employees thereof free all loss,' liability or claim because of,
or arising out of the' acts of emissions of Contractor, his agents and employees, in
the performance of this agreement, or arising out of the use of any patent or patented
article in the performance of this Agreement.
FOURTH: The Contractor' hereby grants to the County, and to any agent or employee of
the County, the irrevocable permission to' enter upon the lands of the above referenced
1and division for the purpose of completing. the improvements. This permission shall
terminate in the event that the Contractor has completed the work within the time specified
or any extension there. of granted by the Building DirectOF.
FIFTH: Contractor agrees at all times, up to the completion and approval of the final
plant~g inspection by the Building Director, to give good and adequate warning to the
trave~,ng public of each and every dangerous condition caused by the construction of
the improvements, and to protect the traveling public from such defective or dangerous
conditons.
SIXTH: The Contractor, his agents and employees, shall give notice to the Butldtng Direc-
tor at least 48 hours before beginning any work and shall furnish said Building Director
811 reasonable facilities for obtaining full information respecting the progress and
manner of work.
SEVENTH: If the Contractor, or his agents or employees, neglects, refuses, or fails
to prosecute the work with such diligence as to insure its completion wtthtn the specified
time,* or wt.thtn such extensions of time as have been granted by the Building Director,
or if the Contractor violates, neglects, refuses or fatls to perrom satisfactorily any
of the provisions of the plans and specifications, he shall be tn default of this
Agreement and notice in writtrig of such default shall be served upon him. The Butldtng
11/87
Director shall have the power ~o terminate all rtghts of the Contractor because of such
default, The determination by the Building Director of the question as to whether
Of the toms of the agreement or specifications have been violated or have not been per-
formed sattsfactortl)' shall be conclusive upon the Contractor, and any and all parties
who may have an)' interest tn the agreement or an)' portion thereof, The foregoing pro-
vimtons of this sectton shall be tn addttton to all rights and remedies available to
the Count)' under law, '-
EIGHTH: The Contractor agrees-to ftle wtth Count)' prior to the date thts agreement
executed a good and sufficient improvement securtt)' tn an)' emoun.t not less than the esti-
mated cost of the work and improvements for the faithful performance of the terms and
conditions of thts agreement and Contractor further agrees that If the Improvement security
is a bond and tf the sureties on the fatthful performance bond or the amount of said
bonds in the opinion of the Butldlng DIrector becomes Insufficient, Contractor agrees
to renew each and ever), satd bond or bonds with good and suffldent sureties or tncrease
the emount of satd bonds, or both, within ten da)'s after being notified b)' the Building
Director that the sureties or amounts are insufficient. Notwithstanding any other pro-
vision heroin, if Contractor fails to take such action as ts necessary to comply vith
satd notice, he shall be tn default of this Agreement unless all required improvements
are completed withtn 90 days of the date on which the Butldtng Director notified the
Contractor of the Insufficient)' of the sureties or the amount of-the bonds or both.
NINTH: It ts further agreed b)' and between the parties hereto, Including the
or sureties on the bonds securing this agreement .that, tn the event ttts deemed necessary
to extend. the time of completion of the work contemplated to s:,e done under this agreement,
extensions of ttme may be granted from ttme to time b)' the 8utldtng Dtrector etther at
his own option or upon request of the Contractor, and such extensions shall in no
affect the valtdtty of this agreement or release the sbrety or suretie~ on satd bonds.
Contractor further agrees to maintain the aforesaid bond or bonds tn full force and effect
during the terms of this agreement,. including an)' extensions of time as may be granted
theretn.
TENTH: It is understood and agreed by the parttom hereto that ff an)' part, term or prov-
ision of thts Agreement ls by the courts held to be unlawful and void, the validity of
the remaining portions shall not be affected and the rights and obligations of the parties
shall be construed and enforced as tf the Agreement did not contain the particular part,
term or provlston held to be tnvaltd.
ELEVENTH: Any notice or nottces required or permitted to be given pursuant to this agree-
ment shall be served on the other party b~,mat1, postage prepold, at the following ad-
dresses:
County
Director of Building & Safety
County of Riverside
County Administrative Center
4080 Lemon Street - 2nd Floor
Riverside, CA. 92501
Contractor
TayCo {Joint venture of Taylor Woodrow Homes
& Costain Homes, Inc.}
3991 .~lacArthur Blvd 66
Newport Beach, CA 9~ 0
IN WITNESS WHEREOF Contractor has affixed his name, address and seal.
Dated:
ATTE3F: By
Gerald A. Naloney Clerk
By
Deputy
Building Director
Approved as to Form:
Gerald J. Geerlings, Count Counsel
By ~ FC~ '
SIGNAT~ S 0 . T BE WITNESSED BY NOTARY AND EXECUTED IN DUPLICATE
AGREEMENT
OF
GENFaAL PARTNERSHIP
OF
TayCo
THIS AGREEMENT OF GENERAL PARTNERSHIP ("Agreement") is
dated as of a0 , 1988, and is entered into by
and among the following:
TAYLOR WOODROW HOMES CALIFORNIA LIMITED, a
California corporation ("TWH"); and
COSTAIN HOMES INC., a Delaware corporation ("CHI")
(collectively referred toas the "Partners,' and individ-
ually as "Partner").
RECITALS
The Partners hereto voluntarily associate themselves in
order to (i) acquire fee title in and to that certain real
property and all improvements thereon, more particularly
described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto (the "Property");
(ii) process all required maps and take all steps required to
receive all necessary entitlements from all governmental
authorities for the development of the Property; (iii) cause
to be constructed all necessary improvements (the "Improve-
ments") in order to create finished lots upon which single
family homes can be constructed (the "Lots"); (iv) market the
Property upon completion of construction of the Improvements
(collectively the "Partnership Business").
IN FURTHERANCE OF THE FOREGOING, and in consideration of
the mutual covenants and promises contained herein, the Part-
ners agree as follows:
ARTICLE 1
ORGANIZATION; PARTNERS
1.1 Formation and Name.
The Partners hereby associate themselves in a gen-
eral partnership pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 1,
Title 2, of the California Corporations Code, known as the
"Uniform Partnership Act" (the "Act"), to operate under the
name and style of TayCo (th~ "gartnership"). Except as other-
wise expressly provided in this Agreement, the rights and
obligations' of the Partners and the administration and
signing of this Agreement, except as to those joint responsi-
bilities,- ItabilitiEs';' indebtedness, or obligations incurred
after the date of this Agreement and as limited by the terms
of this Agreement. This Agreement shall not be deemed to
create a general partnership between the Partners concerning
any activities other than those activities that are within
the scope and business purposes of the Partnership as speci-
fied herein.
5.2 Management.
The management and control 'of the Partnership is
vested in the Partners and all significant decisions regard-
ing the business and activities Of the Partnership shall be
made only by both Partners, each having one '(1) vote. Each
Partner shall designate in writing from time to time its
respective representative for purposes of casting said
votes. Each representative (or alternate) shall be fully
authorized to provide any consent or approval which may be
required herein. -TWH initially designates GORDON TIPPELL as.
its representative and RICHARD POPE as its alternate repre-
sentative.. CHI'. initially designates JACK DANGELO as its
representative and "' DAVID JACKSON' as its' alternate
representative.
Subject to the foregoing, th~ day-to-day manage-
ment and operation of the Partnership and the obligation to
do all things necessary to carry on its business and promote
its purposes shall be vested in the Partners as follows:
(a) CEI shall be responsible for land planning
and the processing of all approvals necessary in order
to develop the Property in accordance with the terms of
this Agreement;
(b) TW~ shall be responsible for construction
engineering, construction management and Partnership
accounting,
The Partners shall be entitled to reimbursement
for all costs incurred by them in the performance of their
duties under- this Section (the "Reimbursable Costs"),
together with an amount equal to fifteen percent (15%) of
such Reimbursable Costs (the "Overhead Fee"). The
Reimbursable Costs and Overhead Fee shall be payable by the
Partnership to the Partner incurring such Reimbursable Costs
UPOn written demand by such Partner, together with copies of
invoices or other documents as reasonably necessary to evi-
dence the expenditure of such Reimbursable Costs.
5.3 Limitation of Authority.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, no Partner shall,
without the prior written consent of the other Partner:
10.
TAYLOR WODDROW HOMES CALIFORNIA LTD.
NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSONS EXECUTING THE AGREEMENTS
TAYLOR WOODROW HOMES CALIFORNIA LTD.
Mr. Richard E. Pope 3991 MacArthur Bivd., Newport Beach, CA 92660
COSTAIN HOMES INC.
Mr. David B. Jackson
620 Newport Center Drive, Suite 400, Newport Beach, CA 92660
FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND
FOR EROSION CONTROL AND LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
For: Erosion Control -
Tract No. 22915-3
Landscape and
Irrigation $127,000.00
Parcel Map No.
Bond No. PB3001 14 74
surety American Home Assurance Company
3 Embarcadero Center
Address
Premium $1270.00
Princi o Costain Homes Inc.)
3991 MacArthur Blvd. ,~
Address
City San Francisco, CA 94111 City Newport Beach CA 92660
Whereas, the County of Riverside, State of California, and TayCo (Joint venture of Taylor WoOdrow
Homes & Costain Homes Inc.} (hereinafter designated as "Principal") has entered
into, or is about to enter into, the attached Agreement whereby Principal agrees to
install and complete the abl~l-~.)ignated erosion control, landscape and irrigation
improvements, relating to 1 , which Agreement is hereby
referred to and made a part hereof; and
WHEREAS, said principal is required under the terms of said Agreement to furnish a bond
for the faithful performance of said Agreement;
NOW, THEREFORE, we, the Principal and American Home Assurance Company ,
as surety, are held and firmly bound unto the County of Riverside, in the penal sum
Of One hundred twenty-seven thousand. Dollars ($127.000.00 )
lawTu] money of the United States, for the payment of which sum we]] and truly to be
made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, successorS, executors and administrators, jointly .
and severally, firmly by these presents.
The condition of this obligation is such that if the above bonded Principal, his or
its heirs, executors, administrators, successors or assigns, shall in all things stand ~
to and abide by, and well and truly keep and perform the covenants, conditions and pro-
visions in the said Agreement and any alteration thereof made as therein provided, on
his or their part, to be-kept and performed at the same time and in the manner therein;
specified, and in all respects according to their true intent and meaning, and shall
idemnify and save harmless the County of Riverside, its officers, agents and employees,
as therein stipulated, then this obligation ~ha]l become null and voidL otherwise it
shall be and remain in full force and effect.
As a part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition to the face amount specified
therefore, there shall be included costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including
reasonable attorney's fees, incurred by County in successfully enforcing such obligation,
all to be taxed as costs and included in any judgement rendered.
284-44-1 tl/87 -
The Surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration
or' tdition to the terms of the Agreement or to the work to be performed thereunder or
th specifications accompanying the same shall in any way affect its obligation on
this bond, and it do~ hereby w~ive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration
or addition to the terms of the Agreement or to the work or to the specifications.
Surety further stipulates and agrees that the provisions of Section 2845 of the Civil
Code are not a condition precedent to the Surety's obligations hereunder and are hereby
waived by the Surety.
When the work covered by the Agreement is complete and the final planting inspection
has been approved by the Building Director, the amount of the obligation of this bond
is reduced by 90% with the remaining 10% held as security until the structure is occupied.
In witness whereof, this instrument has been duly executed by the Principal and Surety
above named on August 23rd. 1989 '
TayCo {Joint venture of Taylor Woodrow Homes & COstain Homes Inc.}
NAME OF PRINCIPAC:
3991 ~acA T~oOo~r
~ e, ,
AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE (s): By
Richard Pope, Vice President, ow
Title
n HomTe%tle
Title
NAME OF SURETY: . ' . e,~,~~ura/~ Company,3 Embarcadero Ctr. San Francisco, CA
AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE: Am~
Re~e~G.~assel torney In-Fact
Title
(If Corporation, Affix Seal)
ATTACH NOTORIAL'ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF SIGNATURE OF PRINCIPAL AND ATTORNEY-IN-FACT
Americkn Home Assurance Company
Natiorml Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, P&
Pristine1 lORd Office: 70 PIne Sirel. New Y~tk. N.Y. 10270
POWER OF AI~rORNEY
No, 03-B-OlO01
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE-PRESENTS: .....
Thlt American Home Assurance Company, 5 New York corporation, and National Union Fire Insursnce Company of Pittsburgh,
a Pennsylvania corporation. does esch hereby appoint
---gierre LeCompCe, N. Ovens, Renee C. BasselZ: o:E Ssn Fraacisco,. CaJ.~£ornia-'-
its true ~nd bwful Attorney(s)-in-Fact, with full ~Jthority to m~.ecute on its behalf bonds, undertakings, recogniz~ces and ~ther
con~racU of indemnity and writings obligatory in the nature thereof, issued in the course of its business, and to bind the respective
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, American Home Assurance Company and National Union Fire Insure Company of Pittsburgh, Pa.
have e~c~ execute these presents
Pres idenc
STATE OF NEW YORK s&
COUNTY OF NEW YORK } 4',' /
o- ~,a 6 d,v w Nay - ,
State of California
County of San Francisco
OFFICIAL SEAL
N. OWENS
ClTf~TAR'( PUBLIC- CALIFORaI~
AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
My C0mmL~0n e ~res May 15 1990
' X ,
'IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIeeIIIIISHiiieiieeeSSSiiI~
~,A.-00-9022 REO(5/88) 1M
55.
On Auqust 23rd. 1989
a No~ry Public of said coun~ and sta~,
Renee G. Basse]l
and personally known to me to be the
American Home Assurance Company
· before me, the undersigned,
personally appeared
Attorney-in-Fact oi
the Corporation that executed the within instrument, and known to
me to be the person who executed the said instrument on behaff of
the Corpsrat{on therein named, and acknowledSed to me that such
Corporation executed the same.
NOTARY PUBLIC
Msure~n P. TulIV, ,~r~tsry ~' ~
CITY OF T!iMECULA
EROSION CONTROL, LANDSCAPE AND IRR IC, ATION
FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND 3SM 802 564 00
Premium: $1,905.00/2YR~
WHEREAS. the City of Temecula, State of California, and
Costsin Homes, Inc. (hereinafter designated as "Principal" )
have entered into an agreement whereby Principal agrees to install and
complete ce~csln designated
acJrement, dated
Erosion Control, Landscape &
Irrigation Tract No. 22915-3 TCSD.
made a part hfir~of: and
WHEREAS, Principal Is required under the terms of the'
agreement to furnish a bond for the FaltiTFul Performance of the
agreement;
public improvements, which said
· 19 , 'end Identified as Project
, is hereby referred to and
American Motorists
NOW. THEREFOR!c, we the Principal and Insurance Comoa_ny
as surety· are held and firmly bound unto the City of Temecula.
California. in the penal sum of $ 127.000.00 , lawful money of the
One hundred twenty seven thousand and no/100
United State~. for the payment of such sum well and truly to b~ made,
we bind ourselves. our heirs, successors. executors and
administrators, jointly and s~verally.
The condition of this obligation Is such that the obligation
'shell become null and void if the above-bounded Principal, his or its
heirs· executors. administrators, successors. or assigns, shall in all
things stand to, abide by. well and tru|y k~p, and perform the
covenants, c. qndltlons. and provisions in the agreefront and any
alteration thereof made as therein provided, on his or their part. to be
FORMS\SNG7
kept and performed at the time and in the manner therein specified, and
in all respects according to his or their true. intent and meaning, and
shall indennify and save harmless the City of Temecula, its officers,
agentS_~ a_nd employ_see, as therein ~tipulated; otherwise, this obligation
shall be and remain in full force and effect,
As a part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition
to the face amount specified therefor, there shall be included costs and
reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attorney~s fees,
incurred by City In successfully enforcing such obligation, all ta be
taxed as coats and Included in any judgment rendered,
The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change,
extension crtr time, alteration or addition to the term= of the agreement
or to the work to be performed thereunder or the specifications
accompanying the same shall in any way affect its obligations on this
bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension
of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the agreement or to the
work or to the specifications.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Instrument has been duly
executed by the Principal end Surety above named, on .~av/4, ,
19 9~,
Seal ) ( Seal )
FOR!"IS\D'iG7
SURETY Areeric n Motor'sos Insurance INCIPAL C stain Homes Inc.
Kipton Ke/ller, Attorney In Fact ~ Julia Newcomb Hill
[ Name ) _ .. .( N,~e ~ .............
ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT
State of CAT.ZFO&_NIA
Dounty of :LOS ANG~r.ES
i',4AYzl 199a
On
personally appeared
before me, KIHBERLY A. BADARACCO, A NOTAEY PUBLIC
KIPTON EELLE~
NAME(S) OF SIGNER(S)
personally known to me - OR - [] proved to me on the basis Of satisfactory evidence
to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are
subscribed to the within instrument and ac-
knowledged'to me that he/she/they executed
I the same in his/her/their authorized
I ~:IMBERLY A. BADARACC0 capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their
~ C0,%.I. #965838 ~ signature(s) on the instrument the person(s),
i NOT;$;Y FU'_LI3-CALIFORN* 0
LC,3 A::2=LE3 ~ ~A
My Cornre. ED. May 8, 996
or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s)
acted, xecuted the i rument.
CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER
['} INDIVIDUAL(S)
[] CORPORATE
OFFICER(S)
Tm.E(S)
[] PARTNER(S}
~{~ ATTORNEY-IN-FACT [] TRUSTEE(S)
[] SUBSCRIBING WITNESS
[] GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR
[] OTHi=R:
SIGNER IS REPRESENTING:
NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITY(IE$)
AMERICAN MOTORISTS
D~'SUEABCE COI~AI~
SIGNATURE OF NOTARY
ATTENTION NOTARY: Although the Information requested below is OPTIONAL. it could prevent fraudulent attachment of this certificate to unauthonzed document. ~,~,
THIS CERTIFICATE Title or Type of Document BOND
MUST BE ATTACHED
TO THE DOCUMENT Number of Pages Date of Document
DESCRIBED AT RIGHT: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx2~xx
~ 1991 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION · 8236 Reinreel Ave. · P.O, Boz 7184 · Cano~a Paf~. CA 91304-7184
FC~MS\ENG7
AMEKICAN MOTOEISTS INSURANCE COMPANY
Hone 0ffioe: Loc~ OPove, lh 60049
PO~,E O1~ ATTOENEY
Know All Men By These Presents:
That the A~sric~n Hot·rests lnsuPsnce Company, · corporation oPganized end existing under
Illinois· ~nd having its principal office in Long GPove, Illinois· does
Kipton Keller of Los Angeles, California
its true and lawful agent(s] and m~torrwy(s)-in-fect, to sake· axecuts, el, and deliver during the
beginning wi~h the date of issuance of this powe. and ending Dec·abet ~1· 199~· unless sooner Pereked for and on
An~ and all bonds and undertakings rovided the amount
of no one bond or under~ak!nX exceeds 1~/0 HILLION FIVE
HUNDEED THOUSAND DOT.T.&ES (~2,500,000.00)~~~
EXCEPTION: NO AUTHORITY is 9r~ntsd to make, execute· seal m~d deliver any bond or undertaking which guarantees the
payment o~ collection of ~ny p~omissory nots· check~ d~aft oP letter of
This authority does not perknit the same obligation to be s~lit into two or mo~ bonds in or~e~ to bring each such
bond within the dollaP limit o~ a~thority ·s set forth
This appointment m·y be revoked st ony time by the American Hot·rests Insurance
The axecut·on of such bonds ~nd undertakings in F~rsuancs of these pPessnts all be ms binding t~on ~he said
American Notedisis insurance Cos~a~y as ~ully and eatply to all intents and ~r~ooes· ms tf the same had b4m~ duly
executed and ·cknowledged by its rfgularly ilected off··aPe at its principal off·o· in Long Grove· Illinois.
THIS APPOINTMENT SHALL CEASE AND TERNINATE ~ITHOUT NOTICE AS OF DECENBER Sl· 1994.
This Power o~ Attor~'~y is executed by authoPity of a Pesolution adopted by the Ex·sutiv· Committee o~ ~he Boer
Directors o~ said American ~otorists Insurance Company on February 2~ 1988 at Long 2r~ova· Illinois· ·
tr~m and accur~at· copy o~ which is hePeina~t·~ set forth and is hereby certified to by the undersigned $4cPet·ry ·s
being in full fo~ce and
~VOTED, That the Chairman of the Boer~· the President, or a~y Vice P~eside~t# or their ap~ointeas designated In
w~i~ing and ~iled with the S~cPmt·,y· oP th~ S~cP·ta~y shall have the power m~d authority to ~point ·gen~s
a~tor~eys-in-~act, and to authorize them to execute on behalf of the Comparlyj s~d ·ttach the seal of the CoKeany
the~eto~ bonds and undertakings· Pecogniza~oes· contracts of indemnity and othe~ writings· obligatoPy in the nature
~hereof, and any such officers of the Company may appoint agents for acceptance of p~ocess.'
This P~we~ o~ Attor~ney is signed· sealed and certified by facsimile under a~d by authority of the ~ollowing
~ssolu~ion adopted by the Executive Committee o~ the Board of DiP·croPs o~ the Company at · meeting duly eelled end
helC on the 2~d day of February· 1988:
~VOTED~ That the signature of the Ci~innan o~ ~he Boa~d· t~e PPesidant~ an~ Vice Pr~sidant# or ~hei~ appointees
designated in writing a~d ~il·d with the S4cr~·Py~ ~nd the sign·tufa of the S~crat·ry· the seal of the Company,
certifications by the Secr~taPy· may be affixed by facsimile on any power of attorney or bo~d executed pursuant ~o
~esolution adopted by the Executive Commi~ts· of the Board of Directors on FmbMry 2~, 1988 and any such poweP so
executed, sealed and caPtidied with r~spect to any bond oP undertaking to which it is attached· shall confirms to be
valid and binding upon the
In Testimony WhePeo~· the American Hot·fists Insur~a~ce Company has caused this instrument to be signed and its
co~po~a~e seal to be affixed by its a~thoPized officers· this O1 day of January · 199q .
Attested end Certified:
F.C.HcCullough, Secretary
AHERZCAN HOTORZSTS INSURANCE COHPANY
J.$.Kemper,llI,Senlor Vice Pr. ,~
(OVEX)
.TE OF ZLLZNOZS SS
COUNTY OF LAKE . ---
I, Harilyn L. Riley· · Notary Public· do hereby certify thet J. S. Kmeer, Ill and F. C. HcCullough personally known
to me to be the same persons whose names ape respectively as Senior Vice President and Secretary of the American
Hotorists Insurance Company# 8 Corlmoretion of the State of llXinois, subscribed to the foregoing instrument·
appeared before me this day in person and severally aoknowXedged that they being thereunto duly authorized signed,'
sealed with the corporate seal and delivered the said instrument as the free and voluntary act of said corpopetio~
and as their own free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes therein set forth.
expires:
4 "OFFICIAL S~"
4 Marilyn L Riley
4 Nmq Public, Sti~ d Illinob
4 My ~mis~ bpifu 4~t~
L. lileyJ Notary Pub s -
CEETIFICATION
of Attorney dated January 1, 199~e on behalf of the person(s) as listed on the reverse side is a
'-ue and correct copy end that the same h~s been in full force and effect since the date thereof and is in full
ce and effect on the date of this certificate; and Z do further` certify that the said J. S. Keeper· lIT and F. C.
.;uZlough who executed the Power' of Attorney as S~nior Vice Pr'esident ~ Slcretlr'y r'espectively were on the data
of the execution of the attached Power' of Attorrmy the duly elected Senior' Vice President and Secretary of the
American Hotor'lets lnsur'ance Company.
IN TESTIHONY WHEREOF, I have her'eunto subscribed my name and affixed the carporate seal of the American
Hotorists Insurance Company on this day of * · 19
N,J,Zertda# Irmts~
This Power of Attorney limits the acts of those named therein to the bonds amd ~f~der'takings specifically rmmed
therein, and they have no author'lay to bind the Compeny except in the manner and to the extent herein stated.
FH 836-5 6-92 1H
Power of Attorney - Term
PRZNTED ZN U.S.A.
...... CITY OF TEMECIL~
PARKLAND / LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMT-~ AGREEMF, NT
DATE OF AGRh'~kfKNT: May 6, 1994
NAIVEE OF SUBDIVIDEI~ Cosrain Homes
CRcfcr~d to as "SUBDIVIDER")
NAMB OF SUBDMSION: vintage wills
~cfcrr~d to as "SUBDIVIDER")
TRACT NO.: 22915-3
TENTATIVE MAP RESOLUTION
OF APPROVAL NO.: 22915-3
0~eferred to as "Resolution of Appmva/")
PARKLAND IMPROVEM]=~NT PLANS'NO.:
(Referred to as "Resolution of Approval")
ESTIMATED TOTAL COST OF PARKLAND IMPRO~S: $ Complete
COMS?LETIONDATE: Scheduled to be accepted in July 1994
NA/vEE OF SURETY AND BOND NO. FOR LABOR AND MATERIALS BOND:
7
NAME OF SUREFY AND BOND NO. FOR FAITKFUL PERFORMANCE BOND:
American Motorists Insurance Company
3SM 802 564 00
NAME OF SURETY AND BOND NO. FOR WARRANTY BOND:
This AgTeement is made and entered into by and between the City of Temecula,
CMifomia, a Municipal Corporation of the Stare of C~lifomia, hereinafter referred to as CITY,
and the SUBDIVIDER.
A. SUBDIVIDER has presented to crrY for approval and recordation, a final
subdivision map of a proposed subdivision pursuant to provisions of the Subdivision Map Act
of the State of Cal{for~{~ and the CITY ordinances and regulations relating to the filing,
approval and recordation of subdivision maps. The Subdivision Map Act and the CITY
ordinances and regulations relating to the filing, approval and recordation of subdivision maps
are collectively referred to in this Agrr, emen[ as the "Subdivision Laws."
B. A tentative map of the SUBDM SION has been approved, subject to the
Subdivision Laws and to the requirements and conditions contained in the Resolution of
Approval. The Resolution of Approval is on file in the Office of the City Clerk and is
incorporated into this Agreement by reference.
C. SUBDIVIDER is required as a condition of the approval of the tentative map that
the Par -kland Improvement. plans must be completed, in compliance with City standards, by the
.Completion Date. The Subdivision Laws establish as a condition precedent to the approval of
a final map, that the SUBDIVIDER has entered into a secured Agreement with the CITY to
complete the Parkland/Landscape Improvement Plans within the Completion Date.
D. In consideration of approval of a final map for the SUBDIVISION by the City
Council, SUBDIVIDER desires to enter into this Agreement, whereby promises to install and
complete, at SUBDIVIDER'S own expense, all the Parkland/Landscape Improvement work
required by City in connection with proposed subdivision.. Subdivider has secured this
agreement by Parkland/l-'mdscaping Improvement Security required by the Subdivision Laws
F~ie: R:~Cof~Wr~jrecleco~Q, 2
and approved by the City Attorney. The term 'Parkland" includes landscape areas intended to
be maintained by the Temecuh Community Services District.
E. Complete Parkland/Landscape Improvement Plans for the construction, installation
and completion of the Parkland Improvements have been prepared by SUBDIVIDER and
approved by the Director of Community Services. The Parkland Improvement Plans numbered
as referenced previously in this Agreement are on ffie in the Office. of the Director of
Community Services and are incorporated into this Agreement by thi.~ reference. All references
in this Agreement to the' Parkland Improvement Plans shall include reference to any
specifications for the Improvements as approved by the Director of Community Services.
F. An estimate of the cost for construction of the Parkland Improvements according
to the Improvement Plans has been made and approved by the Director of Community Services.
The estimated amount is stated on Page 1 of this Ag~.ement. The basis for the estimate is
attached as Exhibit "A" to this Agreement.
G. The CITY has adopted standards for the construction and installation of
Parkland/Landscape Improvements within the CITY. The ParklandYLandscape Improvement
Plans have been prepa4-.ed in conformance with the CITY standards, (in effect on the date of
approval of the Resolution' of Approval).
H. SUBDIVIDER recognizes that by approval of the final map for,SUBDMSION,
CITY has conferred substantial fights upon SUBDIVIDER, including the fight to sell, lease, or
finance lots within the SUBDIVISION, and has taken the final act necessary to subdivide the
property within the SUBDM SION. As a result, CITY will be damaged to the extent of the cost
of installation of the Parkland/Landscape Improvements by SUBDIVIDER'S failure to perform
its obligations under this Agreement, including, but not limited to, SUBDIVIDER'S obligation
to complete construction of Parklandfi-'~ndscape Improvements by the Completion Date. CITY
File:
shall be entitled to all remedies av~ihble to it pursuant to this Agreement and the Subdivision
12ws in the event of a default by SUBDIVIDER.. It is specifically recognized that the
determination of whether a reversion to acreage or rescission of the SUBDM SION constitutes
an adequate remedy for default by the SUBDIVIDER shall be within the sole discretion of
NOW, ~ORE, in consideration of the approval and recordation by the City
Council of the final map of the SUBDIVISION, SUBDIVIDER and CITY agree as follows;
1. SUBDIVIDER'S Obligations to Construct Parkland/Landscape Improvements.
SUBDIVIDER Shall:
Comply with all the requirements of the Resolution of Approval,
amendments thereto, and with the provisions of 'the Subdivision
and any
Laws.
b.
Complete by the time established in Section 20 of this Agreement
and at SUBDIVIDER'S own expense, all the Parkland/Landscape Impwvement
Work required on the Tentative Map and Resolution of Approval in conformance
with the Parkland Improvement Plans and the CITY standards:
c. Furnish the necessary materials for completion of the Parkland
Improvements in conformity with the Parkland Improvement Plans and CITY
stan~h.rds.
d.' Except for easements or other interests in real property to be
dedicated to the homeownen association of the SUBDBrISION, acquire
and dedicate, or pay the cost of acquisition by CITY, of all fights-of-way,
easements and other interests in real property for consUuction or installation of
the ParklandJ'Landscape Improvements, free and clear of all liens and
I~lw: I~:~or, r~drU,~nllmcD~ 4
encumbrances for the SUBDIVIDER'S obligations with regard to acquisition by
CITY of off-sit6 tights-of-way, easements and other interests in real property
shall be subject to a separate Agreement between SUBDIVIDER and CITY.
2. Acquisition and Dedication of Easements or Rights-of-Way. If any of the
Parkland/Landscape Improvements and land development work contemplated by this Agreement
are to be constructed or installed on land not owned by SUBDIVIDER, no construction or
installation shall be commenced before:
a. The offer of dedication to CITY or appropriate rights-of-way,
easements or other interest in real property, and appropriate authorization from
the property owner to allow construction or installation of the Improvements or
work, or
b. The dedication to, and acceptance by, the CITY of appropriate
rights-of-way, easements or other interests in real property, and appmved by the
Department of Public Works, as determined by the Director of Community
Services.
c. The issuance by a court of competent jurisdiction pursuant to the
State Eminent Domain Law of an order of possession. SUBDIVIDER shall
comply in all respects with order of possession.
Nothing in this Section'2 shall be construed as authorizing or granting an extension of time to
SUBDIVIDEI~.
3. Security. SUBDIVIDER shall ~t all times guarantee SUBDIVIDER'S
performance of this Agreement by fumishing to CITY, and maintaining, good and sufficient
security as required by the Subdivision Laws on forms appmved by CITY for the purposes and
in the mounts as follows:
File:
a. to assure faithful performance of this Agreement in regard to said
improvements in and mount of 100% of the estimated cost of the
Parkland/Landscape Improvements; and
b. to secure payment to any contractor, subcontractor, persons renting
equipment, or furnishing hbor materials for Parkland/Landscape Improvements
required to be constructed or installed pursuant to thi.~ Agreement in the additional
amount of 50 % of the estimated cost of the Improvements; and
c. to guarantee or warranty the work done pursuant to this Agreement
for a period of one year following acceptance thereof by CITY against any
defective work or labor done or defective material~ furnished in the additional
mount of 10% of the estimated cost of the ParHand Improvements.
The securities required by this Agreement shall be kept on f~e with the City Clerk. The terms
of the security documents referenced on Page 1 of this Agreement are incorporated into this
Agreement by this Reference. If any security is replaced by another approved security, the
replacement shall be fried with the City Clerk and, upon ~ing, shall be deemed to have been
made a part of and incorporated into this Agreement. Upon filing of a replacement security with
the City Clerk, the former security may be released.
4. Alterations to Parkland Improvement Plans.
a. Any changes, alterations or additions to the Parkland/Landscape
Improvement Plans and specifications or to the improvements, not exceeding 10 %
of the original estimated cost if the improvement, which are mutually agreed upon
by the CTrY and SUBDIVIDER, shall not relieve the improvement security given
for faithful performance of this Agreement. In the event such changes,
alterations, or additions exceed 10% of the original estimated cost of the
~le: P,:'~Cor~4slr~ervluc~ ~
improvement, SUBDIVIDER shall pwvide impwvement security for faithful
performance as required by Paragraph 3 of tM.~ Agreement for 100 % of the total
estimated cost of the improvement as changed, altered, or mended, minus any
completed partial releases allowed by Paragraph 6 of this Agreement.
b. The SUBDIVIDER Shall construct the Parkland Improvements in
accordance with the CITY Standards in effect at the time of adoption of the
Resolution of. Approval. CITY reserves the right to modify the standards
applicable to the SUBDIVISION and this Agreement, when necessary to protect
the public health, safety or welfare or comply vdth applicable State or federal law
or CITY zoning ordinances. If SUBDIVIDER requests and is .granted an
extension of time for completion of the improvements, CITY may apply the
standards in effect at the time of the extension.
Inspection and Maintenance Period.
a. SUBDIVIDER shall obtain City inspection of the
Parkland/Landscape Improvements in accordance with the City standards in effect
at the time of adoption of the Resolution of Approval. SUBDIVIDER shall at all
times maintain proper facilities and safe access for inspection of the Parkland
Improvements by CITY inspectors and to the shops wherein any work is in
preparation. Upon completion of the work the SUBDIVIDER may request a
final inspection by the Director of Community Services, or the Director of
Community Service's authorized rep.resentadve. If the Director of Community
Services, or the designated representative, determine that the work has been
completed in accordance with this Agreement, then the Director of Community
File: R:~(::or~-~elr~..el~xlK~ 7
Services shall certify the completion of the Par~Jnnd/Landscape Improvements to
the Board of Directors.
b. SUBDIVIDER shall continue to maintain the Parkland/Landscape
Improvements for ninety (90) days after they have be~n certhqed completed. No
improvements shall bc f'mally accepted unless the maintenance period has expired,
and all aspects of the work have beeu inspected and determined to have bccn
completed in accordance with the ParkJand/Laudscape Improvement Plans and
CITY standards.
certification.
Release of Securities.
SUBDIVIDER shall bear all costs of-,inspection and
Subject to approval by the Board of Directors of the
Community Services District of the CITY, the securities required by this'Agreement shall be
released as follows:
a. Security given for faithful performance of any act, obligation, work
or Ageement shall be released upon the expiration of the maintenance period and
the final completion and acceptance of the act or work, subject to the provisions
of subsection (b) hereof.
b. The Director of C0mmdnity Services may release a portion of the
security given for faithful performance of improvement work as the Parkland
Improvement progresses upon application therefore by the SUBDIVIDER;
provided, llowever, that no such release shall be for an mount less that 25 % of
the total Parkland Improvement SecuXity given for faithful performance of the
improvement .work and that the security shall not be reduced to an mount less
than 50 % of the total Landscape/Parkland Improvement Security given for faithful
performance until expiration of the maintenance period and final completion and
acceptance of the improvement work In no evem shall the Director of
Community Services authorize a release of the Parkland/Landscape Improvement
Security which would reduce such security to an mount below that required to
guarantee the completion of the knpwvement work and any other obligation
imposed by thi.~ Agreement.
c. Security given to secure payment to the contractor, his or her
subcontractors and to persons fixwishing hbor, materials or equipment shall, six
months after the completion and acceptance of the work, be reduced to an mount
equal to the total claimed by all claimants for whom lien have been fried and of
which notice has been given to the legishtive body, plus an mount reasonably
determined by the Director of Community Services to be required to assure the
performance of any other obligations secured by the Security. The balance of the
security shall be released upon the settlement of all claims and obligations for
which the security was given.
d. No security given for the guarantee or warranty of work shall be
released until the expiration of the warranty period and until any c|a~rns fried
during the warranty period have 'been 'settled. As provided in paragraph 10, the
warranty period shall not commence until final acceptance o~all work and
improvements by the City Council.
e.' The CITY may retain from any security released, and mount
suffxcient to cover costs and reasonable expense~ and fees, including reasonable
attorneys' fees.
7. Injury to Public Improvements. Public Property or Public Utilities Facilities.
SUBDIVIDER shall re'place or have replaced, or repair or have repairS, as the case may be,
all public improvements, public utilities facilities and surveying or subdivision monuments which
are destroyed or damaged or destroyed by reason of any work done under this Agreement.
SUBDIVIDER sh~ll bear the entire cost of replacment or repairs of any and all public property
on public utility property damaged or destroyed by mason of any work done. Under this
a=~r~ment whether such property i.~ owned by the United States or any agency thereof, or the
State of C~lifornia, or any agency or political subdivision thereof, or by the CITY or any public
or private utility corporation or by any combination or such owners. Any repair or replacement
shall be to the satisfaction, and subject to the approval, of the City Engineer.
8. Permits. SUBDIVIDER shall, at SUBDIVTDER"S expense, obt:~in all necessary
permits and licenses for the construction and insmll:~tion of the improvements, give all necessary
notices and pay all fees and taxes required bY law.
9. Default of SUBDIVIDER.
a. Default of SUBDIVIDER shall include, but not be limited to,
SUBDIVIDER'S failure to timely commence construction pursuant to this
Agreement-; SUBDIVIDER'S failure to timely complete construction of the
Parkland/Landscape Improvements; SUBDIVIDER'S failure to timely cure any
defect in the Parkl~nd/I.andscape Improvements; SUBDIVIDER'S failure to
perform substantial construction work for a period of 20 calendar days after
commencement of the work; SUBDIVIDER'S insolvency, appointment of a
receiver, or the filing of any petition in bankruptcy either voluntary or
involuntary which SUBDIVIDER fails to discharge within thirty (30) days; the
commencement of a foreclosure action against the SUBDM SION or a portion
thereof, or any conveyance in lieu or in avoidance of foreclosure; or
SUB_ _DIVIDER'S_faH._ure to perform any other obligation under this AgP-,ement.
b. The CITY reserves to itself all remedies available 'to it at hw or
in equity for breach of SITBDIVIDER's obligations under this Agreement. The
CITY shall have the right, subject to this section, to draw upon or utiliTe the
appropriate security to mitigate CITY damages in event of default by
SUBDIVIDER. The right of CITY to draw upon or utiliT_e the security is
additional to and not in lieu of any other remedy available to CITYL It is
specifxcally recogaized that the estimated costs and security amounts may not
reflect the actual cost of construction or installation of Parkland/Landscape
Improvements and, therefore, CITY damages for SUBDIVIDER'S default shall
be measured by the cost of completing the required improvements. The sums
provided by the improvement security may be used by CITY for the completion
of the Parkland/Landscape Improvements in accordance with the
Parkland/Landscape Improvement Plans and specifications contained herein.
In the event of SUBDIVIDER'S default under this Agreement, SUBDIVIDER
authorizes CITY to perform such obligation twenty days after mailing written
notice of default to SUBDIVIDER and to SUBDIVIDER'S Surety, and ag'rees to
pay the entire cost of such performance by CITY.
CITY may 'take over the work and prosecute the same to completion, by contract
or by any other method CITY may deem advisable, for the account and at the
expense of SUBDIVIDER, and SUBDIVIDER'S Surety shall be liable to CITY
for any excess cost or damages occasioned CITY thereby; and, in such event,
CITY, without liability for so doing, may take possession of, and utiliTe in
File: Fl:XCo~-~etrU..st~iee~ ]. ],
completing the work, such materials, appliances, plant and other property
belonging to SUBDIVIDER as may be on the site of the work and necessary for
performance of the work.
c. Failure of SUBDIVIDER to comply with the terms of this
Agreement shall constitute consent to the filing by CITY of a notice of violation
against all the lots in the SUBDM SION, or to rescind the approval or otherwise
revert the SUBDM SION to acreage. The remedy provided by this Subsection
C is in addition to and not in lieu of other remedies available to CITY.
SUBDIVIDER agrees that the choice of remedy or remedies for SUBDIVIDER'S
breach shall be in the discretion of CITY.
d. In the event that SUBDIVIDER fails to perform any obligation
hemunder, SUBDIVIDER agrees to pay all costs and expenses incurred by CITY
in securing performance of such obligations, including costs of suit and
reasonable attorney's fees.
e. The failure of CITY to take an enforcement action with respect to
a default, or to declare a breach, shall not be construed as a waiver of that default
or breach or any subsequent default or breach of SUBDIVEDER.
10. Waxx2ntv. SUBDIVIDER shall guarantee or warranty the work done pursuant
to this AFeement for a period of one year after expiration of the maintenance period and final
acceptance by the City Council of the work and improvements against any defective work or
labor done or defective materials furnished. WherE. Parkland/Landscape Improvements are to
be constructed in phases or sections, the one year warranty period shall commence after City
acceptance of the last completed improvement. If within the wan'anty period any work or
improvement or part of any work or improvement done, furnished, installed, constructed or
File: R:XC:oN~elr'lLmrsclscl~i.B 1'~
caused to be done, furnished, installed or constructed by SUBDIVIDER fails to fulftll any of the
requirements of this Agreement or the Parkland/Landscape Improvement Plans and specifications
referred to herein, SUBDIVIDER shall without delay and without any cost to CITY, repair or
replace or reconstruct any defective or otherwise unsatisfactory part or parts of the work or
structure. Should SUBDIVIDER fail to act promptly or in accordance with this requirement,
SUBDIVIDER hereby authorizes CITY, at CYrY option, to peffom the 'work twenty days after
mailing written notice of default to SUBDIVIDER and to SUBDIVIDER's Surety and agrees to
pay the cost of such work by CITY. Should CITY determine that an urgency re!tuires repairs
or replacements to be made before SUBDIVIDER can be notified, ~ may, in its sole
discretion, make the necessary repairs or replacements or peffom the necessary work and
SUBDIVIDER shall pay to CITY the cost of such repairs. ..-
11. SUBDIVIDER Not Agent of CITY. Neither SUBDIVIDER nor any of
SUBDIVIDER'S agents or contractors are or shall be considered to be agents of CITY in
connection with the performance of SUBDIVIDER'S obligations under this Agreement.
12. Injury to Work. Until such time as the Parkland/Landscape Improvements
are accepted by CITY, SUBDIVIDER shall be responsible for and bear the risk of loss to any
of the improvements constructed or installed. CITY shall not, nor shall any officer or employee-
thereof, be liable or responsible for any accident, loss or damage, regardless of cause, happening
or occurring to the work or improvements specified in this Agreement prior to the completion
and acceptance of the work or improvements.
are hereby assumed by SUBDIVIDER.
All such risks shall be the responsibility of and
13. Other Ag, reements. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall preclude CITY
from expending monies pursuant to agreements concurrently or previously executed between the
parries, or from entering into agreement with other subdividers for the apportionment of costs
13
F~Io: Pt:',r..Oru',eleu"l~ilmcOeQ ~
of water and sewer mains, or other improvements, pursuant to the provisions of the CITY
ordinances providing therefore, nor shall anything in this Agreement commit CITY to any such
apportionment.
14. SUBDIVIDER'S Obli.-,ation to Warn Public During Construction. Until f'mal
acceptance of the Parkland Improvements, SUBDIVIDER shall give good and adequate warning
to the public of each and every dangerous condition existent in said improvements, and will take
all reasonable actions to protect the public from such dangerous condition.
15. Vesting of Ownership. Upon acceptance of work on behalf of CITY and
recordation of the Notice of Completion, ownership of the improvements constructed pursuant
to this Agreement shall vest in CITY.
16. Final Acceptance of Work. Acceptance of the work on behalf of CITY shall be
made by the City Council upon recommendation of the Director of Conunity Services after
final completion and inspection of all Parkland/Landscape Improvements. The Board of
Directors shall act upon the Director of Community Services recommendations within thirty (30)
days from the date the Director of Community Services certifies that the work has fLually
completed, as provided in Paragraph 5. Such acceptance shall not constitute a waiver of defects
by CITY..
17. Indemnity/Hold Harmless. CITY or any officer or employee thereof shall not
be liable for any injury to persons or property occasionexi by reason of the acts or omissions of
SUBDIVIDER, its agents. or employees in the performance of this Agreement. SUBDIVID]~
further a~s to protect and hold harmless CITY, its officials and employees from any and all
claims, demands, causes of action, li~bility or loss of any son, because of, or arising out of, acts
or omissions or SUBDIVID~-.i~, its agents or employees in the performance of this Agreement,
including all claims, demands, causes of action, liability, or loss because of, or arising out of,
in whole or in part, the design or construction of the Parkland/Lands~pe Improvements. This
indemnification and Agreement to hold harmless shall extend to injuries to persons and damages
or taking of property resulting from the design or construction of the Parkland/Landscape
Improvements as provided herein, and in addition, to adjacent pwperty owners as a consequence
of the diversion of waters from the design or construction of public drainage systems, streets and
other public improvements. Acceptance of any of the Parkland/Landscape ImproVements shall
not constitute any assumption by the CITY of any responsibility for any damage or taking
covered by this paragraph. CITY shall not be responsible for the design or construction of the
Parldand/Landscape Improvements pursuant to the approved Parkland/Landscape Improvement
Plans, -regardless of any negligent action or inaction taken by the CITY in approving the plans,
unless the particular improvement design was specifically required by CITY over written'
objection by SLrBDIVIDER submitted to the Director of Community Services before approval
of the particular improvement design, which objection indicated that the particular improvement
design was dangerous or defective and suggested an alternative safe and feasible design. After
acceptance of the Parkland/Landscape Improvements, the SUBDIVIDER shall remain obligated
to eliminate any defect in design or dangerous condition caused by the design or construction .
defect, however, SUBDIVIDER shall not be responsible for routine maintenance. 'Provisions
of this paragraph shall remain in full force and effect for ten years following the acceptance by
the CITY of Parkland/Landscape Improvements. It is
SUBDIVIDER shall bd responsible for .all liability for
the intent of this section that
design and construction of the
Parkland/Landscape Improvements installed or work done pursuant to this Ag, reement and that
CITY shall not be liable for any negligence, nonfeasance, misfeasance or malfeasance in
approving, reviewing, checking, or correcting any plans or specifications or in approving,
re~,iewing or inspecting any work or construction. The improvement security shall not be
required to cover the provision of this paragraph.'
18. Sale or Disposition of SUBDIVISION. Sale or other disposition of this property
will not relieve SUBDIVIDER from the obligations set forth herein. ff SUBDIVIDER sells the
property or any portion of the property within the SUBD~SION to any other person, the
SUBDrVIDER may request a novafion of thi~ Agreement and a substitution of security. Upon
approval of the novation and substitution of securities, the SUBDIVIDER may request a release
or reduction of the securities required by this Agreement. Nothing in the novation shall relieve
the SUBDIVIDER of the obligations .under Paxagraph 17 for the work or improvement-done by
SUBDIVIDER.
19.
20.
Time of the Essence. Time is of the essence of this Agreement.
Time for Completion of Work Extensions. SUBDIVIDER shall
complete
constructio'n of the improvements required by thi.~ Agreement no later than
In the event good cause exists as determined-by the City Engineer, and if otherwise
permitted under the tentative map condition, the time for completion of the improvements
hereunder may be extended. The extension shall be made by writing executed by the Director
of Community Services. Any such extension may be granted without notice to SUBDIVIDER'S
Surety and shall not affect the validity of this Agreement or release the Surety or Sureties on any
security given for this AFeement. The Director of Community Services shall be the sole and
final judge as to whether or not good cause has been shown to entitle SUBDIVIDER to an
extension. Delay, other Than delay in the commencement of work, resulting from an act of
CITY, or by an act of God, which SUBDIVIDER could not have reasonably foreseen, or by
storm or inclement,weather which prevents the conducting of work, or by strikes, boycotts,
similar actions by employees or labor organiTatlons, which prevent the conducting or work, and
which were not caused by or contributed to by SUBDIVIDER, shall constitute good cause for
an extension of time for completion. As a cdndition of such extension, the Director of
Community Services may require SUBDIVIDER to furnish new security guanntccing
performance of this Agreement as extended in an increased mount as necessary to compensate
for any increase in construction costs as determined by the Director of Community Services.
21. No Vesting of Rights.
Peffomance by SUBDIVIDER of this AgTecmcnt
shall not be construed to vest SUBDIVIDER'S fights with respect to any change in any change
in any zoning or building law or ordinance.
22. Notices. ' All notices required or provided for under this Agr~mcnt shall be
in writing and delivered in person or sent by mail, postage prepaid and addressed as provided
in this Section. Notice shall be effective on the date it is delivered in person, or, if mailed, on
the date of deposit in the United States Mail. Notices shall be-addressed as follows unless a.
written change of address is fried with the City:
Notice to CITY:
City Clerk
City of Tcmecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Tcmccula, California 92390
Notice to SUBDIVIDER:
Costsin Homes Inc.
620 Newport Center Drive, Suite #400
Newport Beach, CA 92660
Attention: Susan Lindquist
23. Scvcrabilitw. The provisions of this .A~'ecmcnt arc scvcmble. If any portion of
this Agreement is ~held invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder of the
A~n'e, cmcnt shall remain in full force and effect unless mended or modified by the mutual
consent of the parties.
24. Captions. The captions of this Agr~ment are for convenience and reference
only and shall not def'me, explain, modify, limit, exemplify, or aid in the interpretation,
construction or meaning of any provisions of this Agreement.
25. Litigation or Arbitration. In the event that suit or arbitration is brought to
enforce the terms of this contract, the prev~{llng party shall be entitled to litigation costs and
reasonable attorney's fees.
26. Incorporation of Recitals. The recitals to this agreement are hereby incorporated
into the terms of this agreement.
27. Entire AgTeement. This Agreement constitutes the entire Agreement of the
parties with respect to the subject matter. All modifications, amendments, or waivers of the
terms of this Agreement must be in writing and signed by the appropriate representative of the
parties. In the case of the CITY, the appropriate party shall be the City Manager.
IN WITNESS WItEKBOF, this Agreement is exccutcd by CI1~, by and through its Mayor.
CITY OF TEMBCULA
Na/~c: Jul$~ ewcom Hill
Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
By:
Mayor
}
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ~ }ss.
COUNTY OF }
r ' ' '
~ C · ~~L~/'34~ personally known to me
to m= nn the h-~ ef e3ti~3Cte~ ~dcnce) to be the pemon(s) whose name(s) ~are subscribed to the
instrument an~ acknowledged to me that ~hey ex~uted the s~e in ~heir authorized ca~c~{
and that ~y hi=/h=r/their signature(s) on the ins~ment the pemon(s) or the enti~ upon behaff of which
person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
~ OtER, YL THIEL
{This area for official notarial seal)
By:
Name:
Director of Community Services
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By:
Scott F. Field
City Attorney
19
EXI-IIBIT A
(Attach the basis for the estimate of the cost of hnprovements.)
TRACT NO. 22916-3
EROSION AND LANDSCAPE
BOND NO. PB300 12 647
In consideration of the premium charged, it is understood and agreed that:
Effective from the 31st day of December, 1993.
THE OBLIGEE'S NAME IS HEREBY CHANGED:
From: The County of Riverside
To: The City of Temecula
Provided, however, that the liability of the American Home Assurance Comnanv under the attached
bond and under the attached bond as changed by this rider shall not be cumulative.
Nothing herein contained shall be held to vary, waive, alter or extend any of the terms, conditions,
agreements or warranties of the undermentioned bond, other than as stated above.
Attached to and forming a part of Bond No. PB300 12 647 issued by the American Home Assurance
CoreDany dated the 25th day of May 1990 on behalf of Tavco (joint venture of Taylor Woodrow
Homes and Cosrain Homes) and in favor of County of Riverside.
Signed this 5th day of April, 1994.
TAYCO, a California general partnership
(Taylor Woodrow Homes California Limited,
a California Corporation and Taylor Woodrow
Real Estate. A California Cornoration)
Princip, al
BY"e""~ J'I~' ~
American Home Assurance Company
Surety
POWER OF ATFORNEY
Americrn Home Assurance Company
.'~ational Union FL-e Insurance C_~mpany of Pittsburgh, Pa.
Pnr, cipal Bond ofrk--t: 70 Pm¢ S~r~t, Ntw York, N.Y. 10270
KNOW kLL M'EN BY THESE PRESENTS:
That Amcricaa Home Ar~urar~'.. C.~mrt-ny, ~ N~t, Yor~ e~rporation, and Netiot21 Union F'u'¢ !a~artm~
does each hereby ap.:x~int "'
--- Richaxd R. H:rr'-~'--rE.: L L":.':z.~ LL:a LT;zgdon. Brian E. Gae-~-n: of. San Francisto, California---
its :r.~t and l,.~-{ul A:t~mc:'D)-ic--F~t. '.;; :~; fi:l! aut.%~n:y to cxr. cutc on itt behalf bc:m~. unck:r~*~in~x~ a.r. tognizane~ and other eoratract~ of h~cmnity and writings
ebiigatc~ in the nature there. of, igaue.~ in th' course oi ,it bt~inexa, and to bind the ~iv¢ company
the·-- prr. s~nts
ST.-'.TE OF :,~,' Y.:).~i t
COUN'Ef OF NE~.V YC-"~-: :~.
bc/'c. rc me ea.".~e the aD.c'-= r,z.':~e-.~ olfic':r of .~,~iC,~.'1
cfEccr de.scni:.exl herr:n, ,Lr.,l ~c?..n~t-'~c~g'~'j tr-:t ;-,e e~.~21cA the
forteeing ip. strumcnt Lnd s,"f'Lt~d -'.he seals ~f said
thereto by aulnCr:ty OC ~.L~
:r: .~Rei~t~or Vic~ P~ident
E.xc~rpts of Kesotu:iof~ adopce. d by the Boards or Dircaor~ cf American Home Assurance Company and National Union Pil~ Insuralx~ Company of Pittsburgh, Pa.
on May'IS. 197,6:
· RESOLVED, t~st me Chairman of t}g Boar~, the Prtsident, or any Vice President be, aM her~ is, suthoriz~l to appoint Attomeyr,-in-Fact to t'epres~nt and
act for and on behalf of th~ C_L,mF~ny to exr~utc bondz. undertaking, reeognianc~s and oligr controls of indemnity and writings oblig;~tory in the susture thereof.
and :0 al~ch :herfro the CO.TL-~L: g..~al O~ the Com?~n:,, it, the trt:n-e..r, ction o( iu; surer)' b'usinex, s;
· RESOLVED, that the --ignt:ur..~ ar.~ sa~tt.:k~. of such off'seers aM the seal of tP, e Coml~ny my be afrtxe~d to any such Po~,~r of Attorney or to stay certi~cafe
relating thereto by fscswnik:, at~ -~,y such Poser of Attorney or eertirw. ate bearing such faeaimi~ sig~atu~$ or fs~r, imik gal shall be valid arid binding upon the
Company when s~ affi.xc.d with r~t'e.c~ to an~ bond, under~.aking. recognizance or other c~ntraet of indemnity or writing obligatory in the ~atuR:
· RESOLVED. that an}' $~,ch Auon~cy-in-Fact ¢leAivcring · secreutnal ccrtirw. ation that tht forethan{ rtsolutions still be in ¢ffext my inert in such c~rtification the
date the reo(, said ate to be no; k.:--r a~n ',h,: C,L:¢ Of delvae.~' tbemf by such Attorncy-4n-Fsct-°
I, Elizabeth M. TbcL Scc:.t-'~t.~. o5 Arficn=a.~ ||orne .d~ssuranc~ C_x>mpany aM of Nstional Unkm F't~ Insuran~ Company of Pittsburgh, P·. ~lo I~r~c~rtify that the
foregoing ¢xctrpts of Kr..~utiona ~.~gw..~ by th" Bosrd~ of Directon ~- f.~ corporations, and ~ Po,s~rg of Attorney issued pursu,tat thereto, m true
correct, and that both L~ P~.~lutk',.°-i t':.'.' t,"te Pcm,,¢.r~ o,I Atto:'~-'~, s~ in full fort~. arid
IN WIT/'. ~ES S V, rHEREOF. i :..,,-- t~.-.,.,,to ,,:t my r.-,,.,d and .m,:.ea th¢ taa.mile gal of r. ach corporation
TRACT NO. 22916-3
BOND NO. PB300 12 647
RIDER
In consideration of the premium charged, it is understood and agreed that:
Effective from the 31st day of December, 1993.
THE OBLIGEE'S NAME IS HEREBY CHANGEDi
From: The County of Riverside
To: The City of Temecula
Provided, however, that the liability of the American Home Assurance COmpany under the attached
bond and under the attached bond as changed by this rider shall not be cumulative.
Nothing herein contained shall be held to vary, waive, alter or extend any of the terms, conditions,
agreements or warranties of the undermentioned bond, other than as stated above.
Attached to and forming a part of Bond No. PB300 12 647 issued by the American Home Assurance
Company dated the 25th day of May 1990 on behalf of Tayco (joint venture of Taylor Woodrow
Homes and Costain Homes) and in favor of County of Riverside.
Signed this 5th day of April. 1994. - .......
TAYCO, a California general partnership
(Taylor Woodrow Homes California Limited,
a California Corporation and Taylor Woodrow
Real Estate, A California Corporation)
By: ~]~
American Home A~suranc~ Companv
Surety
AGREEMENT
FOR EROSION CONTROL AND LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS
This Agreement, made and entered into by and between t County of Riverside, State
~o~m~i~oF~es h~r~8~i:t~{" _c~t,~s,Co)~tcy:} and TayCo ~oi nt venture of Taylor
· heroinafter called Contractor.
284-44
WITNESSETH
FIRST: Contractor, for and in consideration of the issuance of grading and landscaping
agrees, at Contractor's own cost a · o furnish
all labor, equipment and material necessary to perform and complete, and within
months from the date this agreement is executed, to perform and complete in a F2nd
workmanlike manner· all those erosion control, ..landscape and irrigation improvements
in accordance with those landscape and irrigation plans for the development of said
land division which have been approved by the County Building. Director, and are on file
in the Office of the Riverside County Building and Safety Department and to do all work
incidental thereto in accordance with the standards set forth in Riverside County Ordinance
No, 457, as amended, which are expressly made a part of this agreement. All of the
above required work shall be done under the inspection of and to the satisfaction of,
the County Building Director, and shall not be deemed complete until approval of the
final planting inspection is made by the Building Director. Contractor further agrees
to maintain the above required improvements, following the approval of the final planting
inspection, until the structure is occupied and, during this period to restore, repair
or replace, to the satisfaction of the Building Director· any defective work or labor
done or defective materials furnished. The estimated cost of said work and improvements
is the sum of One hundred fifty-eight thousand. f~ve hun~rea--dollars
($158,500.00 ).
SECOND: Contractor agrees to pay to the County the actual cost of such inspection of
the works and improvements as may be required by the 8ui]ding Director. Contractor
further agrees that if suit is brought upo, this agreement or any bond guaranteeing
the completion of the landscape and irrigation improvements, all costs and reasonable
expenses and fees incurred by the Cou,ty in successfully enforcing such obligations
shall be paid by Contractors including reasonable attorney's fees, and that upon entry
of judgment. such costs, expenses and fees shall be taxed as costs and included in
any judgment rendered.
THIRD: County shall not, nor shall any officer or employee of County, be liable or
responsible for any accident, loss or damage happening r occurring to the works specified ~
in this agreement prior to the completion and approval thereof, nor shall County or
any officer or employee thereof, be liable for any persons or property injured by reason
of the nature of the work, or by reason of the acts or omissions of Contractor, his
agents or employees, in his performance of the work, and all of said liabilities are
assumed by Contractor. Contractor agrees to protect, defend and hold harmless County
and the officers and employees thereof.from all 1oss~' liability or claim because of, '~*_
or arising out of the acts of omissions of Contractor, his agents and employees, in
the performance of this agreement, or arising out of the use of any patent or patented
article in the performance of this Agreement.
FOURTH: The Contractor hereby grants to the County, and to any agent or employee of
the County, the irrevocable permission to enter upon the lands of the above referenced
land division for the purpose of completing the improvements. This permission shall
terminate in the even.t that the Contractor has completed the work within the time specified
or any extension thereof granted by the Building Director.
FIFTH: Contractor agrees at all times, up to the completion and approval of the final
planting inspection by the Building Director, to.give good and adequate warning to the
traveling public of each and every dangerous condition caused by the construction of *
the improvements, and to ~rotect the traveling public from such defective or dangerous
cond t ton s.
SIXTH: The Contractor, his agents and employees, shall give notice to the Building Direc-
tor at least 48 hours before beginning any work and shall furnish said Building Director
all reasonable facilities for obtaining full information respecting the progress and
manner of work.
SEVENTH: If the Contractor, or his agents or employees, neglects, refuses, or fails
to prosecute the work with such diligence as to insure its completion within the specified
time, or within such extensions of time as have been granted by the Building Director,
or if the Contractor violates, neglects, refuses or fails to perform satisfactorily any
of the provisions of the-plans and specifications, he shall be in d_efault of this
Agreement and notice in writing of such default shall be served upon him. The Building
11/87
Director shall have the power ~o terminate all rights of the Contractor because of Such
default. The determination by the Building Director of the question as to whether any
of the terms of the agreement or specifications have been violated or have not been per-
formed satisfactorily shall be conclusive upon the Contractor, and any and all parties
who may have any interest in the agreement or any portion thereof. The foregoing pro-
visions of this section shall'.be in addition to all rights and remedies available to
the County under law. _ ___
EIGHTH: The Contractor agrees to file with County prior to the date this agreement is-
executed a good and sufficient improvement security in any amount not less than the esti-
mated cost of the work and improvements for the faithful performance of the terms and
conditions of this agreement and Contractor further agrees that if the improvement security
is a bond and if the sureties on the faithful performance bond or the amount of said
bonds in the opinion of the Building Dtrector becomes insufficient, Contractor agrees
to renew each and every said bond or bonds with good and sufficient sureties or increase
the amount of said bonds, or both, within ten days after being notified by the Building
Director that the sureties or amounts are insufficient. Notwithstanding any other pro-
vision herein, if Contractor falls to take such action as is necessary to comply with
said notice, he shall be in default of this Agreement unless all required improvements
are completed within 90 days of the date on which the Building Director notified the
Contractor of the insufficiency of the sureties or the amount of the bonds or both.
NINTH: It is further agreed by 'and between.the parties hereto, including the surety
or sureties on the bonds securing 'this agreement that, in the event it is deemed necessary
to extend the time of completion of the work contea~olated to be done under this agreement,
extensions of time may be granted from time to time by the Building Director either at
his own option or upon request of the Contractor, and such extensions shall in no way
affect the validit) of this agreement or release the s~rety or suretie~ on said bonds.
Contractor further agrees to maintain the aforesaid bond or bonds in full force and effect
during the terms of this agreement, including any extensions of time as may be granted
therein.
TENTH: It is understood and agreed by the parties hereto that if any part, term or prov-
ision of this Agreement is by the courts held to be unlawrful and void, the validity of
the remaining portions shall not be affected and the rights and obligations of the parties
shall be construed and enforced as if the Agreement did not contain the particular part,
term or provision held to be invalid.
ELEVENTH: Any notice or notices required or permitted to be given pursuant to this agree-
ment shall be served on the other party by mail, postage prepaid, at the following ad-
dresses:
County Contractor
Director of Building & Safety TayCo (joint venture of Tayl or
County of Riverside Woodrow Homes & Costai n Homes, Inc )
County Administrative Center '
4080 Lemon Street - 2nd Floor 3991 Mac Arthur B1 vd.,
Riverside, CA. 92501 Newport Beach, CA 92660
IN WITNESS WHEREOF Contractor has affixed his name, address and seal.
Dated:
~ "cY'C~' ~ ~ .
° Court Riverside
ATTEST:
Gerald A. Haloney Clerk
By
Deputy
Building Director
President
Approved as to Form: .
Gerald J, 6eerlings, Count Counsel
-BS~GNATURE _ BE WITNESSED BY NOTARY AND EXECUTED. IN DUPLICATE
FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND FOR GRADING PROJECTS
AND/OR EROSION CONTROL - LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS
Bond No. PB30012647 GPADING
Premiuan $1.585.00 Rough (US) $
Surety Am. Home Assurance C0. Precise (US) $
Address 3 [mbarcader0 Center EROSION-LANDSCAPE (US) $158,500.00
San Francisco, CA 94111 Total (US) $
TayCo (joint venture of layl or
Principal W0odr0w & Costain Homes) TRACT/PARCEL MAP NO. : Tr 22916-3
Address 3991 Mac Arthur BIrd. OTHER PROJECT.NO. :
Newport Beach. CA 92660
of California,
W~nereas, the County of Riverside, State
TayCo (joint venture of Tay]0r W00dr0w Homes & C0stain Homes. Inc.)
hereinafter designated as "Principal" and other-wise know aS
"Landowner" in the heroin referenced Agreement(s) have entered
into, or are about to enter into, the attached Agreement(s) whereby
Principal agrees to perform certain work relating to the above
referenced tract, parcel map, or other project, which Agreement(s)
is/are hereby referred to and made a part hereof; and
W~EREAS, said Principal is retired under the texans of said
Agreement(s) to furnish a security for the faithful perform&mce of
said Agreement (s) .
NOW, THEREFORE, we the Principal and American Home Assurance COmpany
as surety, are held and fi~nly bound unto
the County of Riverside (hereinafter .County"),in the penal sum of
be hundred fifty-eight thousand, five hundred- Dollars
(US $ 158,500.00 ) lawful money of the United States, for the
payment of which sum well and truly-to be made, we bind ourselves,
severally, firunly by these presents.
and ·
The conditions of this obligationis such that if the above bounded
Principal, his or its heirs, executors, administrators, successors
or assigns, shall in all things stand to and abide by, and well and
truly keep and perform the covenants, conditions and provisions in
the said Agreement(s) and any alteration thereof made as therein
provided, on his or their part, to be kept and performned at the
time and in the manner therein specified, and in all respects
according to their tr~/e intent and meaning, and shall idemnify and
save harmless th~ County, its officers, agents and employees, as
therein stipulated, then this obligation shall become null and
void; otherwise, it shall be and remain in full force and effect.
As a part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition to the
face amount specified therefore, there shall be included costs and
reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attorney's fees,
incurred by County in successfully enforcing such obligation, all
to be taxed as costs and included in any judgement rendered.
284-44-2 Rev. 10/89
The Surety hereby stipulate and agrees that no change, extension
of time, alteration-~r-addition to the terms of the Agreement(s)
or to the work to be performed thereunder or the specifications
accompanying the seane shall in anywise affect its obligations on
this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change,
extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the
Agreement(s) or to the work or to the specifications. Surety
further stipulates and agrees that the provisions of Section 2845
of the Civil Code are not a condition precedent to the Surety's
obligations hereunder and are hereby waived by the Surety.
When the rough or precise grading project elements captioned above
are completed, and upon acceptance thereof, the Building Director
of the County shall authorize the release of the appropriate amount
of this security.
When erosion control - landscape improvement work covered by the
Agreement is complete, the Building Director of the County will
accept the work and thereupon the amount of the obligation of this
security for said work is reduced by 90% with the remaining 10%
being held a~ security until the occupancy of any structure(s) is
permitted.
In witness whereof, this instrument has been duly executed by the
Principal and Surety above named, on MaT 25 , 1990 .
NAME OF PRINCIPAL: TayC0 (joint venture of Taylor W00dr0w Homes & Costain Homes Inc.)
AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE (S) By: 1 /~' '
· n
. Pope Til ~
Title
(IF CORPORATION, AFFIX SEAL)
NAME OF SURETY: American Home Assurance COmpany
AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE: ~~ I~
Pierre Le Compte, -in-Fact Title
( IF CORPORATION, AFFIX SEAL)
(ATTACH NOTARIAL ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS OF SIGNATURES OF PRINCIPAL AND
ATTORNEY-IN-FACT.)
FORM Appf~:)VE D'
COUNTy COUNSEL
Amqrican Home Assurance Compan~
Netm~al Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittslxargh, Pa,
pt~.q<~,p.-| le,~l Olfk:e: ?0 PIne Street. New Y~rt, N.Y. 10210
POWER OF ATTORNEY
No. 03-B-OlO01
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:
That American Home Assurance Company. a New York corporation. and National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh. Pa..
a Pennsylvania corporation, does each hereby appoint
---Pierre LeCompte, N. Owens, Renee G. Bassell: of San Francisco, California---
its true and lawful Artorney(s).ir~Fact, with full authority to execute on its behalf bonds, undertakings, recognizances and other
contracts of indemnity and writings obligatory in the nature thereof, issued in the course of its business, and to bind the respective
company thereby.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, American Home Assurance Company and National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa.
have each executed these present~
this 6 day of Hay
Edvarrd J. Fr~'ch, Vice 'President
STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
On this 6 day of HaY ' ,19 87
before me came the above named officer of American Ho~ne
Assure CoreDany and National Union Fire Insurance Company
of PiUlburgh. Pa.. to me personally known to be the individual
officer described heroin. and ecknce4edged that he executed the
foregoir~ ir~ttrurnent ~ affixed the tells of Mid coqxxationl
thereto by authority Of h~ Offic~
CERT! FICATE
Excerpts of Resolutions adopted by the Boards of Directon of America~ Home Assurance Company and National Unio~ Fire
Insurance Company of PiU~burgh. Pa. on May 18, 1976:
"RESOLVED that the Chairman of ~e BoatcL the President ot any Vice President he, and heretW it authorized to appoint Attorneys-in-Fact to
Jrepreent Ittd'lct fOr and on behalf of The Company to exect;ts bonds, undertakings, recognizances and other contrecta of indemnity end'writings
obI Niatory in the naNre Thereof. and to attach thereto the corporate ml of the Cornpiny, in The nnsaction of its surety
"RESOLVED, that the s4gnitures and/~lestations of f4Jch oflicmn and the seal of the Company may be affixed to lny Ijch PolNlf of ATTOrney Of tO.
any cenificatm relating mereto by IN:simile, and any mjch Povvw of Attorney or certificate beatirNg such f~csimile I~gnamre~ Or facsimile semi
vivid ,nd binding upon the Corrtpeny when so affixed with rlq:~cl to ,ny bond, under~kin~, recognizance Or oTher contrect
obligatory in the nature
"RESOLVED. that any mjch AttOrney-in-Fmct delivering · secretarial cenilicltion thlt the foregoing rlsolutions Itill be in effect may insert in leach
rmrtificmtmn the datl thereof, laid date to be not Iltlr thin the dam of delivery thereof by roach AttOrney-~n-Flct.'°
I, Maureen P. Tully, Secretary of American Home Assurance Com~)any and of National Union Fire Insurance Company of
Pin~burgh, Pa. do hereby certify that the foregoing excerpts of Resolutions adopted by the Boards of Directors of these corpors-
tions, and the Powers of Attorney issued punuant thereto, are true and correct, and that both the Resolutions and the Powers of
Attorney are in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the facsimile sad of each corpora6on
?'t240 (9/85)
this 25chlav of Hay .19~_0.
Meuraen p. Tullv, Secretary T
CITY OF TEMECULA
EROSION CONTROL, LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION
FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND ash 802 565 oo
$2,378.00/2 YRS
WHEREAS. the City of Temecula. State of California, and
Cos cain Homes, Inc. (heroinafter designated as "PrintSisal")
have entered into an agrc~--nent whereby Principal acJree~ to install and
complete ceiLsin designated public improvements. which said
agreement, dated ,19 , and Identified as Project
Erosion Control, Landscape & , is hereby rdrerred to and
WHEREAS, Principal Is required under the terms of the
agreement to furnish a bond for the Faithful Performance of the
agreement:
American Motorists
NOW, THEREFORE, we the Pr~nc~pe~ end Insurance Company
as surety, are held and firmly bound unto the City of Temecula.
California. in the penal sum of $ 158,500.00 , lawful money of the
One hundred £i£cy eight thousand £ive' hundred and no/ZOO
United States. for the payment of such sum well and truly to be made,
we bind ourselves. our heirs, su~rs. executors and
administrators, jointly and sever211y.
The condition of this obligation Is such that the obligatlon
shall become null and void if the above-bounded Principal, his or its
heirs, executors. administrators, successors. or assigns, shall in all
things stand to, abide by. well end truly keep, and pertom the
covenants, conditions. and provisions in the agreement and any
alteration thereof made ea therein provided, on hie or their pert. to be
FORNS\ENG7
kept ancz ~erformed at the time and in the rr~nner therein specified, and
in all respects according to his or their true intent and meaning, and
shall indemnify and save harmless the City of Temecula, its officers,
ages.re. and employees, as therein stipulated: otherwise, this obligation
shall be end ternsin in full forte and effect.
As a part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition
to the face mnount specified therefor, there shall be included costs and
reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable ettorney's fees.
incurred by City in succuduily enforcing such obligation. all to be
taxed as cost~ and includ~cl in ~ny judgment r~nclered.
The surly hereby stipulates and agrees that no change,
extension af tim, alterotion or eddltion to the terms of the agreement
or to the work to be performed thereunder or the specifications
accompanying the sam shall in any way/feat its obligations on this
bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such chBnge. extension
of time, alteration or addition to the term of the agreement or to the
work or to the specifications.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Instrument has been duly
executed by the Principal and Surety above nm~eci, on May 4, .
19 94
( Seal ) ' ( Seal )
FO~\I~7
' eAm~can otis s Insurance
Company
: By:
Ki.oton Keller, Attocney In Face
(NAf118)
( i ]tie)
PRINCIPAL CostBin Homes, Inc.
| Name)
President and Chief Kxecutive Officer
( Till · |
Brent C. Anderson
(Name)
ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT NO~
State of CALIFORNIA ., CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER
Cbunty of LOS ANG'FTr. ES F! INDIVIDUAL(S)
':" 'r ,:~ ~:, !'1 CORPORATE
On before me, Fa3BERLT A, BADAP, ACCO, A NO'tART FOBI.,~C OFFICER(S)
DATE NAME Trrt,E OF OFFICER - F_G.. 'JANE DOE NOTARY PUBLIC' TrR,E($)
r-I PARTNER(S)
pe.'sonally appeared KIPTON ]rRTr.T.'EIR ~ ATTORNEY-IN-FACT
NAME(S) OF SIGNER(S) '
[] TRUSTEE(S)
~ Demonally known to me - OR - [] proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence
to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are [] SUBSCRIBING WITNESS ·
subscribed to the within instrument and ac- [] GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR :';
knowledged to me that he/she/they exeCUted [] OTHER:
~ '~',,:~..~',' K~MBER~¥A.~ADARACC0 ~ the same in his/her/their authorized -'
i c0~'.:..1 (:~5s38 o capacity(tee), and that by his/her/their .:.
"~ :Tj, f; ~ .., signature(s) on the instrument the person(s),
~ ~¢~"':"-'.',.L", NOTARY FL:ZLi"-GA~-IFO ~A DO
"M, %~m~T:~.~,2°~.' ,99e I ortheentityuponbehalfofwhichtheperson(s) SIGNER IS REPRESENTING:
.. NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITY(IE$) !,.
acted, executed the i strument.
' i INSICE CO)~'~1I
SIGNATURE OF NOTARY
ii ATTENTION NOTARY: Althougl~ the information requested below es OPTIONAL jt COuld prevent fraudulent attacfiment of this cerlificate to unauthorized document.
/ THIS CERTIFICATE Title or Type of Document BOND
MUST BE ATTACHED
:;~ TO THE DOCUMENT Number of Pages Date of Document
!:! DESCRIBED AT RIGHT: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx .,
~_: .... :--.----.--,:~--:_-,,:_~__-_:__-,.-;:.~..,,: .
¢ 1991 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION · 8236 Reinram Ave. · P.O. Box 7184 · ~lnoga Park, CA 91304-7184
FORNS\ENG7
'A/~R/CAN MOTORISTS [NSUKANCE COMPANY
Nome Office: Long gr~ve, IL i, eO~,")
POWEK OF ATTOENEY
Know All Men By 'These PreS~ait~:
That the Amsricsn Hotorie~s Insurerice Coraltony, m corSmrstio~ orgmnized end existing under the 1s~s of the StBte of
Zllinois, ~nd h~ving its principal offic,s in Long Grove, Zllinois, do~s hereby m~9oint
Kipton Keller of Los Angeles, California AAAAAAAAAAAAA
its true and lawful at(s] and mttorney(s)-in-fmct,, tomeke, execute, seal, and deliver during the period
beginning with the date of issuance of this ~x~wer end ending ~r S1, 19~+, unless sooner revoked for and
its behalf as surety, and as its act and deed:
Any and all bonds and undertakings rovided the amount
of no one bond or undertaking exce~s TWO HILLION FIVE
HUNDEED THOUSAND DOLLARS ($2,500,O00.O0)~AX~A~A~**
EXCE?TION: NO AUTHORITY is granted to make, execute, se~l end deliver any bond or undertmkine whic~ guarantees the
payment or collection of ~ny promissory note, c~eck, draft or letter of credit.
This authority does not permit the s~me obliemtion to be s~lit into two or more bonds in order to bring each such
bond within the dollar limit of mutherity ms set forth herein.
This appointment m~y be revoked st ely time by the American Herofists Insurance Company.
The execution of such bonds end undertaings in pursuance of these presen,s s~mll be ms binding Won the
American Hotcrisis Insur%nce Company as fully end m~ly to all intents ~nd purposes, ms if the s~me had been duly
executed and acknowledged by its roeulmrly elected officers mt i~s principal office in Lime Grove, Illinois.
THIS APFOINTNENT SHALL CEAS[ AND TEK~INATE WITHOUT NOTICE AS OF D~C[NB~ ~1, 1994.
This Power o~ Attorney is executed by mu,~Mmrity of m resolu,ion adopted by the [xecutive C~mmittse of the Boat
Directors of said American Hotcrisis Insurance Compimy on February 2~, 1988 at Lone Grove, Illinois, ·
true ~nd accu~te copy of which is hereinmfter sat forth end is ~ereby certified to by the ~w~ersigned Secretary ms
being in ~ull ~oree ~nd effect:
"VOTED, That t~e Chairman o~ the Board, the ~resident, or ~ny Vice President, or their m~wmintees designated in
writing ~nd ~iled with the Secretwry, or the Secretary s~mll have the power end muiberity to mp~mint scents
atiorneys-in-fect, and to ~utborize them to execute on beh~l~ of the Company, and attach the seal of the Company
thereto, bonds end undert~kines# recognizances, contracts of indemni,y end other writings, obligatory in the nature
thereo~, ~nd any such officers of the Company may ~oint ·eents for acceptance of process.~
This Power of Attorney is started, sealed ~nd certified by facsimile under ~nd by authority of tho following
resolution. ~dopted by the Executive Committee o~ the Board o~ Directors of the Company st e meeting duly called
held on the 35rd day o~ Februare, 1988:
"VOTED# That the sienature of the Chairman of the Board, the President, any Vice President, or their
designated in wriline end filed with the Secretary' sod the signature of the Secretary, the se·l of the Company, end
certifications by the Secretary, m~y be affixed by f~csimile on ~ny power of attorney or bond executed ~ursu~n,
resolution ~iopted by the Executive Coemnittme o~ the B~mrd of Direc{or$ on Febfiery 21, 1988 m~d my such power
executed, sealed ~ certified with respect to imy bond or undertaking to which it is attached, sh~ll continue to be
valid and binding u~on the C~mpmny."
In Testimony Whereof, the American Hotcriers Insurance Company has c~usod this instrument to be signed ~nd its
corporate seal to be affixed by its muthorized officers, this O1 day of J~wary , 1994 .
and Carttfiod:
F.C.HcCullouDh, Secretary
AFIERICAN HOTORISTS INSURANCE COHPANY
(OV'F_.X)
.E OF ZLLZNOZ$ $S
COUNTY OF LAKE -'-
I, Harilyn L, Riley· · Notary Public· do her·by certify that J. S. Kemp·r# Ill ~nd F. C. ~cCullough personally known
to me to be ,ha same persons whom· names ale lespectiveZy ms Senior Vice Pies,dent end Seal·,spy of ,ha American
Hotorists Insurance CompBny, · Cotpole, ion of the State of Ill,re,s, subscribed to the foregoing instrument,
appeared before me this day in person ~nd severally moknowiedged that ~hay being thereunto duZy muthorlzed signed,
sealed with the corporate ce·l end dolivered the rid ins, Pure·fit ·s the free end voZuntary act of said cotpore,ion
and as their own free and voltm~tmry ~ct for the uses end purposes ,hal·in set forth.
fly omZsslon expJles: 4.-")-")6
4 "OFFICIAL SEAL"
4 Marilyn L Riley
4 Notary Public, State of |llinall
4 My Commismmm Expires 419~6
CERTIFICATION
I, N. J. Zarada, Secretary of the, American Hotor,st· Insurance CompBny, do hereby certify ,hat the 8~tached Powmr
of Attorney dated January 1· 199~ on behalf of the person(s) ms
~' · and correct copy and thai the sane h~s been in fulZ force and effect since ,he data ,hereof ~nd is in full
e and effect on the date of this certificate; and Z do further certify that the said J. S. Kemp·r, ZZZ 8nd F. C.
s.__ullough who executed the PoWer of Attorney as Senior Vice President and Secretary leapactively ware on the dote
of the execution of the attached Power of Attorney the duly elected Senior Vice President and Secretary of the
American Hotor,st· ZnsuPBnce Company.
TN TESTZHONY WHEREOF# T have hereunto subscribed Ily r~me and affixed the corportte ml of the AmericBn
.otorist. Znsurance Company on this day of ~AY ~ 199/1
N.J.Zmrmdm, Secretary
This Power of Attorney limits the acts of those named thars~n to the bonds and mameimr,mkings specificrally named
therein# and they have no authority to bind the Company except in the manner and to the extant her·in stated.
FH 836-$ 6"92 IH
Power of Attorney - Term
PRZNTED IN U.S.A.
ITEM 5
APPR~
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
PREPARED BY:
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt a resolution entitled:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
Board of Directors
Ronald E. Bradley, General Manager
June 14, 1994
TCSD Proposed Rates and Charges for Fiscal Year 1994-1995
(~ ~'beryl Yasinosky, Management Assistant
·
That the Board of Directors:
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 94-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ADOPTING
RATES AND CHARGES FOR COMMUNITY SERVICES, PARKS
AND RECREATION, STREET LIGHTING, SLOPE MAINTENANCE,
RECYCLING AND REFUSE COLLECTION SERVICES, AND' S,TREET
AND ROAD IMPROVEMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1994-1995.
BACKGROUND: The purpose of the TCSD Rates and Charges is to provide necessary
community services and programs to property owners within the City of Temecula. The TCSD
is currently comprised of six (6) city-wide service levels and are identified as follows:
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Community Services, Parks, and Recreation.
Service Level A - Arterial Street Lighting and Median Maintenance·
Service Level B- Residential Street Lighting.
Service Level C - Perimeter Landscaping and Slope Maintenance.
Service Level D - Recycling Program and Refuse Collection.
Service Level R - Streets and Roads.
R:~YABINON~CED.CHG 0~19M
The formula used to levy the rates and charges has not been changed from last fiscal year.
Every non-exempt parcel within the City will receive a rate and charge for two (2) service
levels: ComrnU'nity Servic~s;'Parks, and Recreation, and Service Level "A". Only those
property owners who receive benefit from three (3) service levels pay for those services
(residential street lighting, slope maintenance, and recycling and refuse collection). No rates
and charges are proposed for Service Level R.
For a single family residence, the proposed rate for Community Services, Parks, and Recreation
is 967.50, an increase of 93.30 for the year. This increase is due to the expansion of
community recreation facilities and programs which include the Temecula Community
Recreation Center and the Old Town Temecula Senior Center.. Furthermore, new additions to
the city-wide park system include John Magee Park (1 acre), Loma Linda Park (2 acres), Kent
Hintergardt Memorial Park (9.2 acres), Paloma Del Sol Park (9.1 acres) and Riverton Park (5
acres).
For Service Level "A", the proposed rate of 94.18 for a single family residence will not
increase from East year.
Service Level "B" includes only those property owners within residential subdivisions that have
street lighting services. The proposed rate of 926.30 per property owner represents a
decrease of $4.58 from last year.
Service Level "C" includes only those property owners within residential subdivisions receiving
TCSD maintenance of slopes and perimeter landscaping. Due to the acceptance of additional
parcels into the maintenance program, some property owners will be included into lower rate
levels beginning this fiscal year. In addition, the four (4) rate levels for Service Level "C" have
been reduced 94.00 from last year and are identified as follows:
Rate C-1: 946.00
Rate C-2: 989.00
Rate C-3: 9116.00
Rate C-4: 9175.00
Service Level "D" provides the Recycling and Refuse Collection Program for Fiscal Year 1994-
1995. This service level includes all single family residential properties in the City of
Temecula. The proposed yearly rate of 9169.36has increased 94.36 from last year. This is
due to an increase in .County landfill dumping costs and Consumer Price Index (CPI) increases.
Service Level "R" was'established last fiscal year to provide for the construction, installation
and maintenance of streets and roads. No rate and charge will be levied for this service level
in Fiscal Year 1994-1995.
In summary, the average single family residence, receiving benefit from all service levels, will
have a net decrease in the TCSD Rates and Charges for Fiscal Year 1994-1995of 90.92cents
from last year.
R:~YASINONGCSD.CHG 0E19~4
FISCAL IMPACT: The revenue generated from the TCSD Rates and Charges for
Fiscal Year 1994-1995 will fund the parks and recreation; median and slope maintenance;
street lighting; 'ztnd recyclin~ bi~d refuse collection services in the City of Temecula.
A'i'rACHMENTS:
Resolution No. CSD 94- adopting the TCSD Rates
and Charges for Fiscal Year 1994-95.
Final Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 1994-1995.
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 94-
A RESOLUTION OF ~ BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ~
TEMECULA COIVIIhrtJNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
ADOPTING RATES AND CHARGES FOR COMMUNITY
SERVICES, PARKS AND - RECREATION, STREET
LIGHTING, SLOPE MAINTENANCE, RECYCLING AND
REFUSE COLLECTION SERVICES, AND STREET AND
ROAD IMPROVEM~,NTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1994-1995.
WHEREAS, upon incorporation of the City of Temecula, California (the "City") effective
December 1, 1989, voters also approved the formation of the Temecula Community Services
District CTCSD"), which has the sam6 area and boundaries as the City and whose Board of
Directors (the "Board") consists of the members of the City Council of the City; and
WHF~REAS, the TCSD proposes to continue such rates and charges for community
services and parks, recreation facilities, services and programs, operation, maintenance, service
and administration of street lighting, slope maintenance, and recycling and refuse collection
services (the "Services and/or Facilities") for those areas specifically benefitted thereby and
charges by the county services areas or the TCSD for such services in prior fiscal years; and
WHEREAS, the Board has requested the preparation of a report for Fiscal Year 1994-
1995 containing the proposed rams and charges for f~ing with the Secretary of the TCSD
pursuant to the Community Services District Law being Division 3 of Title 6 of the Government
Code of the State of California, commencing with Section 61000 (the "Act"); and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 61621.2 of the Act, an Engineer's Report for Collection
for the Fiscal Year 1994-1995 (the "Report") has been presented and fried with the Secretary
of the TCSD which contains a description of the proposed Services and/or Facilities to be
provided and the proposed rates and charges for such Services and/or Facilities, and a
description of the parcels subject to the rates and charges. The Report is based upon a budget
adopted by the Board for the proposed Services and/or Facilities for specific areas where such
Services and/or Facilities are provided, including necessary staff and administrative expenses;
and
WHEREAS, the Board requested that stiff provide mailed notice of the public hearing
regarding these rates and charges to each property owner subject to the rates and charges at least
fourteen (14) days prior to the date set for the public hearing; and
R:%C~ESO~clNAL.RES 061494
WHEREAS, notice of the public hearing was mailed and published as required by law
and the affidavits of publication and mailing are on file with the Secretary; and
WHRREAS, at the public hearing conducted on June 14, 1994, as noticed, the TCSD
heard and considered all oral and written pro~sts and comments by any interested person
concerning the proposed rates and charges or the method of their collection; and
WHRREAS, at the conclusion of the public hearing, the TCSD modified/confirmed the
rates and charges in the amounts set out on .Exhibit "A" enti~ed "Project Summary", attached
and incorporated by this reference, confirmed their collection on the tax roll and approved an
appeal procedure; and
WHF~RFAS, the TCSD further fmds that based on the Report and budget, the rates and
charges as set out on Exhibit "A" are the reasonable cost of the Services and/or Facilities to be
provided by the TCSD for Fiscal Year 1994-1995; and
WHI~RFAS, the TCSD proposes to collect the rates and charges at the same time, in the
same manner, by the same persons and Wgether with and not separately from, the property taxes
collected within the TCSD. These rates and charges shah be delinquent at the same time and
thereafter be subject to the same delinquency penalties as such property taxes. All laws
applicable to the levy, collection, and enforcement of pwperty taxes, including, but not limited
to, those pertaining to the matters of delinquency, correction, cancellation, refund and
redemption, are applicable to these rates and charges. However, if for the first year the charge
is levied, the real property to which the charge relates has been transferred or conveyed to a
bona fide purchaser for value, or if a Hen of a bona fide encumbrancer for value has been
created and attaches thereon, prior to the date on which the first installment of such taxes appear
on the roll, then the charge, or the delinquency in that charge, assessed pursuant to this section
shall not result in a lien against the property, but instead shah be transferred to the unsecured
roll for collection;
NOW, TttF~REFORE, THE BOARD OF DIKECTORS OF THE TEMECULA
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT DOES HEI~I~IY, RESOLVE, DETEILMINE AND
ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The rates and charges for Fiscal Year 1994-1995 as set out on Exhibit "A"
for the Services ancEor Facilities are adopted for Fiscal Year 1994-1995.
Section 2. The'TCSD shah collect such rates and charges at the same time, in the same
manner, by the same persons and together with and not separately from, the property taxes
collected within the TCSD. These rates and charges shah be delinquent at the same time and
thereafter be subject to the same delinquency penalties as such property taxes. All laws
applicable to the levy, collection, and enforcement of property taxes, including, but not limited
to, those pertaining to the matters of delinquency, correction, cancellation, refund and
redemption, are applicable to these rates and charges. However, if for the first year the charge
R:XC'tRESO~FINALRES 081494
is levied, the real property to which the charge relates has been transferred or conveyed to a
bona fide purchaser for value, or if a lien of a bona fide encumbraneer for value has been
'created and atta.._ches thereon_, pn_'or to the date on which the first installment of such taxes appear
on the roll, 'then the charge, or the delinquency in that charge, assessed pursuant to this section
shall not result in a lien against the property, but instead shall be transferred to the unsecured
roll for collection.
Section 3. ff a property owner subject to these rates and charges challenges or questions
the levy of the rates and charges to such property owner's property, such property owner may
appeal the levy by filing an appeal with the TCSD Secretary before 4:30 p.m. on July 1, 1994,
pursuant to procedures established by the TCSD. The appeal period may be extended to
September 1st, provided that the property owner reimburse the City for any County Assessors
fees associated with mending the property tax statement.
Section 4. ff a property owner subject to these rates and charges believes that payment
of the rates and charges for fiscal year 1994-1995 would create a hardship for that property
owner during that fiscal year, such property owner may appeal the levy by filing a hardship
appeal with the TCSD Secretary before 4:30 p.m. on luly 1, 1994, pursuant to procedures
established by the TCSD.
Section 5. The TCSD Secretary is ordered to transmit or cause to be transmitted to the
County Auditor of the County of Riverside, California (the "County") before August 10, 1994,
the property tax roll with such rates and charges enumerated for each parcel not exempt
therefrom; and the County Auditor of the County is hereby designated, required, empowered,
authorized, instructed, directed and ordered to make collection of all such assessments as shown
on that roll and to perform any and all duties necessary therefor.
Section 6. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act the levy and collection
of these rates and charges is exempt from CEQA pursuant to Section 15273 of the State
Guidelines and the Secretary is instructed to file a Notice of Exemption with the County Clerk.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED. this 14th day of June, 1994.
TEMF, C~ COMMUNITY SFIVICES
DISTRICT
ATTEST:
Jeff Stone, President
June Greek, Secretary/City Clerk
[SEAL]
R:~C~e. ESO~INAL.RE8 061494
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
CITY OF TEMECULA
)
) ss
)
I, , Secretary/City Clerk of the Temecula Community Services
District, HEREBY DO CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. CSD 94- was duly
adopted at a regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services
District on the 14th day of June, 1994, by the following roll call vote:
AYES: DIRECTORS:
NOES: DIRP_,CTORS:
DIRECTORS:
June Greek, Secretary/City Clerk
R:~C~ESO~,FINAL.RES 061494
EXItlB1TA
PROJECT SUMMARY
TEIVlECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
On April 1, 1994, Municipal Financial Services was retained by the City of Temecula
to prepare the Annual Levy Report for the Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) for
the Fiscal Year 1994/1995. Pursuant to the Community Services District Law, Division 3 of
Title 6 of the Government Code of the State of California, commencing with Section 61000 et
sell., the TCSD has the power to levy and eoilect special rates and charges in order to carry on
its operations and to provide the services and facilities furnished by it.
The levy and collection of the special rates and charges is accomplished by the
assignment of benefits to each parcel within a specific service level A Service Level is a
defmed area that provides a specific service, operation and maintenance and/or program to only
those parcels contained within that service level.
The TCSD is currently composed of six (6) city-wide service levels. The descriptions
of the service levels are as follows:
Community Services. Parks and Recreation. Operations, maintenance, and
administration of the City community park systems, recreation facilities, services
and programs.
Service Level A - Arterial Street Lights and Median Maintenance.
Operations, maintenance, utility costs, and administration of all arterial street
lights, medians and traffic signals.
Service Level B - Residential Street LiVhts. Operations, maintenance, utility
costs and administration of all residential street lights.
,
Service Level C - Perimeter Landscaping, and Slope Maintenance. Operations,
maintenance, utility costs, improvements, and administration for all perimeter
landscaping and slope maintenance areas maintained by the TCSD.
Service Level D - Refuse. Collection. Recycling and Street Sweeping.
Operations, and administration of the refuse and recycling program, and street
sweeping services for all single family residential homes.
Service Level R - Streets and Roads.
maintenance of streets and roads.'
Construction, installation, and
R:~C,~a, ESO%FiNALRE8 081494 '
The Financial Analysis contained heroin contains each Service Level included with their totals
for Fiscal Year 1994-1995 to be as follows:
Service Level Levy Budget
$/SFR
Community Services/Parks:
Service Level A
Service Level B
Service L~vel C
Service Level D
Service Level R
$2,508,773.00 $67.50
$155,358.00 $4.18
216,186.00 $26.30
428,214.00 Variable
1,474,787.00 $169.36
$ 0.00 0.00
TOTAL TCSD LEVY FY 94/95 $ 4,783,318.00
The Levy and Collection amounts for all non-exempt parcels within the TCSD for the Fiscal
Year 1994/95 are as shown on the Assessment Roll on fde with the City Clerk.
R:~C;~.RESO'~I::INAL.RE$ 081494
CITY OF
TEMECULA
FINAL ANNUAL LEVY REPORT
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
FISCAL YEAR 199411995
Revised May 20, 1994
May, 1994
MUNI FINANCIAL, SERVICES, INC.
Corporate Office
28765 Single Oak Drive, Suite 200
Temecula, CA 92590
Tel: (909) 699-3990
Fax: (909) 699-3460
Orange Cout;ty Office
150 El Camino Real, Suite 120
Tustin, CA 92680
Tel: (714) 665r2220
Fax: (714) 665-2230
San Francisco Office
3727 Buchanan, Suite 202
San Francisco, CA 94123
Tel: (415) 441-3550
Fax: (415) 441-1401
TABLE OF CONTENTS
OVERVIEW .......................................................................................................1
A. Introduction ........................................................................................1
B. Description of the District and Services .............................................1
DESCRIPTION OF THE DISTRICT: .............: ....................................................3
CHANGES TO THE DISTRICT .........................................................................6
A. Annexations ..................................L .....................................................6
B. Modifications of the Distdct Structure .....~ ..........................................6
C. District Budget Changes ...........................................................· .........6
DISTRICT BUDGETS .............................................. ..........................................7
METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT .....................................................................10
Appendix A - LAND USE/EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS .............. 13
Appendix B -- 1994/95 COLLECTION ROLL ........................................14
OVERVIEW
A. Introduction
The Temecula Community Services District ("District") was formed in 1989 upon
incorporation of the city, to continue services previously provided by the county.
The boundary of the District is coterminous with the city boundary, and includes
all taxable parcels within the city. The city. collects special rates and charges in
order to provide services and maintain the improvements within the District. The
District has been formed and the rates and charges established pursuant to
Section 61621 of the Government Code.
This report describes the proposed rates and charges for Fiscal Year 1994/95 -
based on the historical and estimated cost to provide services and maintain
improvements that provide a benefit to properties within the District. EaCh parcel
charged receives direct benefit from the District.
For the purposes of this report, wherever the word "parcel" is used, it refers to an
individual property assigned its own assessment number by the county. The
· County Auditor/Controller Office uses assessment numbers to identify on the tax
roll those properties that are charged for special district benefits.
A public hearing will be held to allow the public an opportunity to hear and be
heard regarding the District. After the public hearing, the Board of Directors may
order the modification of this report. After approval of this report, as submitted or
as modified, the board shall order the levy and collection of rates and charges for
Fiscal Year 1994195. In such case, the rate and charge information will be
submitted to the County Auditor/Controller. The County Auditor/Controller will
include the rates and charges on the property tax roll for Fiscal Year 1994~95.
Description of the District and Services
The District provides certain services and the maintenance of specific
improvements within public rights-of-way and dedicated landscape easements
throughout the city.
The District consists of six separate service levels providing services within
certain areas throughout the city. Each parcel is grouped within one or more
service levels based upon its location .and the quantity and type of services
provided within that area. Each service level has differing costs depending upon
the various services providing benefits to the parcels within the level. Each parcel
is charged its fair share of the costs of the services providing benefit.
Services and improvements provided include the construction and maintenance
of community parks, recreation programs, street lighting, median landscape
maintenance, peri~ete~ landscape maintenance, slope protection, a recycling and
refuse collection program, and road improvement construction and maintenance.
Table I below, provides a comparison of levy information for the various service
levels within the District, comparing the current fiscal year to the previous year.
The Rate Per Levy Unit for Community Services, Parks and Recreation, and for
Service Level A, is based on a charge per equivalent dwelling unit (EDU). The
Rate Per Levy Unit for Service Levels B, C, and D is based on a per parcel
charge. Service Level R is not being collected for 'Fiscal Year 1994/95 and the
Rate Per Levy Unit does not apply. AI.ong with the comparison of levy information
for each year, this table shows the Net Change Per Levy Unit from the previous
year, the Total Levy Units and the Total Number Of Parcels within each service
level for Fiscal Year 1994/95. (Refer to appendix A for a listing of EDU
calculations:)
TABLE I
SERVICE LEVELS
SERVICELEVEL
1993~94
Total Levy Charge Total Levy
Budget Per Levy Budget
Unit
$2,415,360 $64.20
Community Services, Parks,
and Recreation
Service Level A Arterial Street 157,304 4.18
Lighting and Medians
Service Level B Residential 191,765 30.88
- Street Lighting
Service Level C Local
Landscaping and SlOpes
Rate Level # I (C-1) 26,150 50.00
Rate Level # 2 (C-2) 83,235 93.00
Rate Level # 3 (C-3) 137,280 120.00
Rate Level #4 (C-4) 176,136 179.00
Service Level D 'Citywide 1,379,730 165.00
Recycling and Rsfuse
Service Level R Roads $0 $0.00
$2,508,773
155,358
216,186
1994/95
Charge Net Total Total
Per Levy Change Levy Number
Unit Per Levy Units Of
Unit Parcels
$67.50 $3.30 37,167.00 14,654
4.18 $0.00 37,167.00 14,654
26.30 ($4.58) 8,220 8,220
40,710 46.00 ($4.00) 885 885.
104,308 89.00 ($4.00) 1,172 1,172'
113,796 116.00 ($4.00) 981 981
169,400 175.00 ($4.00) 968 968
1,474,787 169.36 $4.36 8,708 8,708
$0 $0.00 $0,00 N/A NIA
Note: Due to rounding, the total Levy Units (shown in this table) multiplied by the Charge Per Unit may be different from
the Total Levy Budget.
2
DESCRIPTION OF TIlE DISTRICT
A description of the current service levels within the District are listed on the
following pages,
Community Services, Parks, and Recreation include maintenance, service,
and operations of all public parks in the District. Most park construction is
provided either by developers as a condition of their residential projects or
development impact 'fees. This service level also allows for the construction of
the Community Recreation Center and its debt service. In addition, this service
level provides funding for the various recreation programs throughout the city.
The following is a list of some of the city's parks and recreation facilities:
· Rancho California Sports Park
· Sam Hicks Monument Park
· Veterans Park
· Bahia Vista Park
· Old Town Temecula Senior Center
· Temecula Community Recreation Center
· Paloma Del Sol Park
· Loma Linda Park
· Riverton Park
· John Magee Park
· Kent Hindergardt Memorial Park
· Calle Aragon Park
Service Level A, Arterial Street Lighting and Medians provides a benefit to all
parcels within the city through the servicing, operation, and maintenance of street
lighting and landscaped medians along arterial streets.
Service Level B, Residential Street Lighting provides a benefit to all single
family residential and vacant parcels within those tracts requiring servicing,
operation, and maintenance of local street lighting.
'Service Level C, Perimeter Landscaping and Slopes provides the servicing,
operation, and maintenance of perimeter landscaped areas and slopes within the
public right of way and dedicated easements within certain tracts. The level of
maintenance required within these tracts varies depending on operating costs and
therefore, four rate levels have been established. (Refer to Table Ii on the next
page.)
3
Table II below shows a breakdown of the tracts composing each rate level within
Service Level C (Local Landscaping and Slopes.)
TABLE II
Service Level C Tracts ,
Rate Level #1 $46,00
Tract Name Tract #
Presley Development 23267-00
23267-O1
23267-02
23267-03
23267-04
26861-01
26861-02
Rancho Solaria 22593*00
22593-01
22593-02
The Vineyards 20879-00
20879-01
Rate Level #2 $89.00
' Tract Name Tract #
Ridgeview 20735-07
20735-08
20735-09
20881-00
21764-00
Winchester Creek 20130-00
20130-01
2013002
2013003
2013004
20130-05
20130-06
2134000
21340-01
21340-02
21340-03
21340-05
21340"06
21340-07
Woodcrest Country 21561-00
22208-00
Rancho Highlands 2064:3-00
20644-00
22203-00
2220~-00
21760-00
Rate Level #3 $116.00 Rate Level f¢4 $175.00
Tract Name Tract # Tract Name Tract #
Martinique 23128-00 Meadowview 21765-00
Saddlewood 1851800 Signet Series 20882-00
18518-01 20882-01
18518-432 20882-02
18518-03 20882-03
Vintage Hills 22715-00 Village Grove 21672-01
22715-01 21672-02
2271502 21672-03
22716-00 21672-04
22716-01 21673-00
22716-02 2167501
22716-03 21673-02
22716-04 2167503
2291500 21674-00
2291501 21674-01
22915-02 21674-02
2291 5-03 21674-03
21675-01
21675-02
2167 5-03
2167 5-04
21675-05
21675-06
Service Level D, Citywide Recycling and Street Sweeping provides for the
operation and administration of the refuse and recycling program and street
sweeping services for all single family residential homes.
4
Service Level R, Roads includes the construction and maintenance of streets
and roads thmugho_ut.t__he city. Service Level R (Roads) was added to the District
in FiScal'Year 1993/94. This service level provides funding for construction and
maintenance of public streets and roads throughout the city.
There are no planned projects being added to Service Level R, for Fiscal Year
1994/95, and therefore no parcels within the Community Services District will be
charged for this service level in Fiscal Year 1994/95.
5
CHANGES TO THE DISTRICT
For FisCal Year 1994/95, changes within the District that affect the levy are
outlined below.
A. Annexations
Annexations to Service Level C (Local Landscaping and Slopes), are the parcels
within Tracts 23267-02, and 23267-3 (Presley Development) to rate level # 1, and
Tract 21760-00 (Rancho Highlands) to rate level # 2.
No other annexations are planned to any of the other service levels or to the
District for Fiscal Year 1994/95.
B. Modifications of the District Structure
Modifications to the District structure, if any, could include, but are not limited to;
changes in the types of services provided, addition of new service levels, or
revisions in the method of apportionment. No changes are anticipated to the
District structure for this fiscal year.
C. District Budget Changes
The Community Services, Parks and Recreation Service Level rates have
increased due to the operations and maintenance costs of the Temecula
Community Recreation Center, and the Old Town Temecula Senior Center, as
well as expansion and improvements to several neighborhood and community
parks. Service Level D (Recycling and Refuse), has increased due to an
increase in the County landfill dumping costs and normal Consumer Price Index
(CPI) increases.
6
DISTRICT BUDGETS
Table'ill on the ne'~ :t~ree pages shows the District budget for Fiscal Year
1994/95.
TABLE !11
1994/95 DISTRICT BUDGET
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT I ~
OPERATING BUDGET DEPARTMENT SUMMARY FOR THE YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 1995
I
Acct, Community Level A Level B Level C Level D Level R
Services
Total District
No. 190 · 191 192 193
PERSONNEL SERVICES
Salaries and Wages 5100 $.498,956 $15.391 $19,006 $54.672 $0 $0 $588,025
Deferred Compensatjon 5101 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PERS Retirement 5102 70,857 2,186 2,699 7,764 0 0 83,506
Site Unemployment 5103 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0
Medicare FICA 5104 7,235 223 276 793 0 0 8,527
Auto Allowance 5106 2,400 0 0 0 0 0 2,400
Life Insurance 5108 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Unemployment Training Tax 5109 23,451 723 893 2,570 0 0 27,637
Disability Insurance 5110 O 0 0 0 0 0 0
WorRers Compensation 5112 26,085 1,639 174 2,332 0 0 30,230
Health insurance 5113 84,966 2,646 5,880 9,114 0 0 102,606
Dental Insurance 5114 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Medical RetmOursement 5115 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Vision Insurance 5116 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Child Care Reimbursement 5117 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Temporary Help 5118 0 0 0 0 ' 0 0 0
. Pa d-Time (Project) 5119 208, 105 0 0 0 0 0 208, 105
Par~-T~me Retirement 5120 8,039 0 0 0 0 0 8,039
~ver'dme Wages 5121 2,500 0 0 0 0 0 2,500
ComDensated ADsences 5126 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Life & Accident Insurance 5190 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES $932.594 $22.808 ,$28,928 $77,245 $0 $0 $1.061.575
7
TABLE III
1994/95 DISTRICT BUDGETS
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT I I I
OPERATING BUDGET DEPARTMENT SUMMARY FOR THE YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 1995
Acct. Community
Services
Number 190
OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE
Telephone Service (Cellular) 5208 $4,500
Repair & MainL - Facilities 5212 · 106,000
Repair & Maintenance-Vehicles 5214 11,000
Repair & MainL-Office Equipment 5217 1,000
:Maintenance Supplies 5218 0
Office Supplies 5220 13,500
Pnnting 5222 34,000
Legal Documents/Maps 5224 3,000
Dues and Memberships 5226 2,000
Publicatmns 5228 1,000
Cellular Phone Service 5229 0
Postage and Packaging 5230 6,000
Property Tax Admin Fees 5231 0
Rent * Facilities 5234 2,450
Rent * Equipment 5238 15,000
Equipment Lease 5239 15,400
Utilibes 5240 227,900
Small tools/Equipment 5242 10,000
Uniforms 5243 5,200
Signs 5244 4,000
Legal Services 5246 20,000
Consulting Services 5248 0
Other Outside Services 5250 84,800
Advertising 5254 4.000
Public No~Jces 5256 1.000
Coni'erences 5258 7,200
Professional Meetings 5260 2,000
Staff Train~ngJEducat;on 5261 2,800
Mileage 5262 4,000
Fuel Expe;~se-City VehicJes 5263 5,000
Coun~l Discretionary 5267 20,000
Blueprints 5268 1,000
SUBTOTAL (5200's) $613.750
Recreation Supplies 5301 $161,600
Waste Hauling 5315 0
Street Lighting 5319 0
Insurance 5330 34.489
VehicJes 5335 18,744
information Systems 5340 50,692
Support Sennces 5345 17,428
"~adlities 5350 47,968
Assessment Engmeenng 5370 20,000
City Admm Charges 5380 162,000
Landscape Maintenance 5415 284,450
:SUBTOTAL (5300's & 5400's) $797,371
OTHER EXPENDITURES 499,600
TOTAL OPERATIONAL EXPENDFTURES $1,910,721
Level A Level B Level C Level D Level R
191
$0
0
0
0
500
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8,000
500
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,000
0
0
$1o,oo0
192
so
0
o
0
0
0
o
o
o
o
0
o
o
0
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
$o
193
$0
43,700
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
91,900
0
0
0
0
0
40,000
0
0
0
O
0
0
0
0
0
$175,600
$o
o
o
o
0
0
0
o
o
o
0
o
0
0
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
0
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
$0
$o $o $o $o
o o o 1,5ol,95o
12o,ooo 208,000 o o
o o o o
o o o o
o 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
' 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
15.000 0 235,140 0
$135.000 $208.000 $235,140 $1,501,950
0 0 0 0
$145,000 $208,000 $410,740 $1,501,950
$o
o
o
o
0
0
o
o
o
0
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
0
o
o
0
o
o
o
o
0
0
o
$o
$o
o
0
o
o
o
o
0
o
o
o
$o
0
$o
Total District
$4,500
149,700
11,000
1,000
500
13.500
34.000
3,000
2,000
1.000
0
6,000
0
2.450
15,000
15o400
327.800
10,500
5,200
20,(h
0
124,800
4,000
1.000
7.200
2,000
2.800
4,000
6,000
20,000
1,000
$799,350
161,600
1,501,950
328,00Q
34,489
18,744
50,692
17,428
47,968
20,000
162,000
534,590
$2,877,461
499,600
$4,176,411
8
TABLE III
1994/95 DISTRICT BUDGETS
'TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT I ~
OPERATING BUDGET DEPARTMENT SUMMARY FOR THE YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, t99S
AccL Community Level A Level B
Services
Level C
Number t90 19t 192 193
Level D
CAPITAL OUTLAY
'Office Furnishings 5601
= Office Equipment 5602
~Vehides 5608
i Equipment 5610
CIP - Project~ 5604
TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY
RESERVE FOR CONTINGENCY
TOTAL DISTRICT COSTS
OTHER REVENUE SOURC ES-$ubtracted
FUND BALANCE-subtracted
BALANCE TO LEVY
$2,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
2,000 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
13,500 0 0 0 0
0 15,000 0 75,000
$17,500 $15,000 $0 $75,000 $0
0 0 0 0 0
$2,860,815 $182,808 $256,928 $562,985 $1,501,950
277,000 0 0 40,000 0
75,042 27,450 20,742 94,771 27,163
$2,508,773 $155,358 $2t6,186 $428,214 $1,474,787
Level R
$o
0
0
$o
o
$o.
o
o
$0
Total District
$2,000
2,000
0
13,500
180,0oo
$107,500
0
$5,345,486
317,000
245, 168
$4,783,318
9
METHOD OF .APPORTIONMENT
As in past years, the cost to provide services within the District will be fairly distributed
among each assessable property based upon the estimated benefit received by each
property. The benefit formula used is based upon the service level, .the land use and
size of a property.
For Service Level Communily Services, Parks, and Recreation, and Service Level A:
Arterial Street Lighting and Medians, each property is assigned an Equivalent Dwelling
Unit (EDU) factor that reflects the property's land use and degree of benefit. For service
levels (B-Residential Street Lighting; C-Local Landscaping and Slopes; and D-Recycling
and Refuse), the rates and charges are based on a per parcel basis. Service Level R
(Roads) is not being applied to parcels within the District for Fiscal Year 1994/95.
The following is the formula used to calculate each property's District charges by EDU.
Please refer to Appendix A for a complete listing of land use codes and their associated
EDU.
Service Levels: Community Services, Parks and Recreation; A -- Arterial Street Lighting and
Medians:
Parcel EDU X Acres or Units X Charge per EDU = Parcel Charge
The following is the formula used to calculate each property's District charges by the per
parcel method.
Service Levels: B -- Residential Street Lighting; C - Local Landscaping and Slopes; and
D -- Citywide Recycling and Refuse:
Total Balance to Levy/Total Parcels in Service Level = Parcel Charge '
10
Table IV shown on the next two pages, reflects the levy calculations for various property
types for each._service leveJ ....
TABLE IV
PARCEL CHARGE CALCULATIONS FOR
COMMUNITY SERVICES, PARKS, AND RECREATION
Property Type..
Single Family Residential
Multi Family Residential
Agricultural
Single Family Vacant
Non-Residential Vacant
NOn-Residential Improved
· : .., Parcel: X .Charge.. = .. Parcel Multiplier
. EDU.:" per · : Charge : . .:'.
EDU
1,00 $67,50 $67,50 Per Unit
0,75 $67,50 $50,62 Per Unit
0,50 $67,50 $33,76 Per Acre
2,00 $67,50 $135,00 Per Acre
4,00 $67,50 $270,00 Per Acre
6,00 $67,50 $405,00 Per Acre
PARCEL CHARGE CALCULATIONS FOR
SERVICE LEVEL A
Single Family Residential
Multi Family Residential
Agricultural
Single Family Vacant
Non-Residential Vacant
Non-Residential Improved
Property Type
1,00 $4,18 $4,18 Per Unit
0,75 $4,18 $3,14 Per Unit
0,50 $4,18 $2,09 Per Acre
2.00 $4,18 $8,36 Per Acre
4,00 $4,18 $16,72 Per Acre
6,00 $4,18 $25,08 Per Acre
PARCEL CHARGE CALCULATIONS FOR
SERVICE LEVEL B
:: ::::'::: : : ~ .: ::::.'::':: ':paFcei~::!::~X::'~:i!Charge:.::i.~.:=,,~: iparcel:,::!~i~::~:::!-iMultiplier.'
: :: :: ::: ..........'per .......':':'::: :::::.i
· '.: :i:::': .~:!'!! ::; ::i;i!~,::::i ':::::::;:~ :::::::::::::::::::::::: Barge! ...........' ": !::,' ========================================= :~:::::i::.
Single Family Residential Parcels
1,00 $26,30 $26,30 Per Parcel
11
TABLE IV
PARCEL CHARGE CALCULATIONS FOR
SERVICE LEVEL C
Parcel Multiplier
Charge
Single Family Residential Rate C-1
Single Family Residential Rate C-2
1.00 $46.00 $46.00 Per Parcel
1.00 $89.00 $89.00 Per Parcel
Single Family Residential Rate C-3
Single Family Residential Rate C-4
· 1.00 $116.00 $116.00 Per Parcel
1.00 $175.00 $175.00 Per Parcel
PARCEL CHARGE CALCULATIONS FOR '-
SERVICE LEVEL D
:i Pr6~ty~ Type
Parcel
Unit
X . ·Charge·
.. per ·
Parcel
~" .';.'..P~'ei' : Multihiier
.. charge· .. ...
Single Family Residential
1.00
$169.36
$169.36 Per Unit
12
Appendix A-- LAND USE/EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS
Single Family Residential
tMulti Family Residential
~Agdcultural
Single Family Vacant
Non-Residential Vacant
Non-Residential Improved
Property Type ..' ":':: ' ': :':': ""1994/95'Z~:~ :Multiplier
..... Equivalent..~ :.
Dwelling Unit'
1.00 Units
0.75 Units
0.50 Acres
2.00 Acres
4.00 Acres
6.00 Acres
13
Appendix B -- 1994/95 COLLECTION ROLL
Parcel identification, for each lot or parcel within the District, shall be the parcel as
shown on the County Assessors map for the year in which this report is
prepared.
Non-assessable lots or parcels include government-owned land, public utility-
owned property, and land principally encumbered with public rights-of-way.
A listing of parcels within this District, along with the charges, has been submitted
to the City Clerk and, by reference, is made part of this report.
14
REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY'
ITEM 1
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
HELD MAY 10, 1994
A regular meeting of the Temecula Redevelopment Agency was called to order at 9:04 PM,
PRESENT: 4 AGENCY MEMBERS: Birdsall, Mur~oz, Roberrs,
Parks
ABSENT: I AGENCY MEMBERS: · Stone
Also present were Executive Director Ronald E. Bradley, General Counsel Peter Thorson and
Agency Secretary June S. Greek.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None given.
AGENCY BUSINESS
It was moved by Agency Member Birdsall, seconded by Agency Member Mu~oz to approve
Items I and 2. The motion was unanimously carried with Agency Member Stone absent.
1. Minutes
e
1.1 Approve the minutes of April 5, 1994.
CombininQ Balance Sheet as of March 31, 1994 and the Statement of Revenues.
Expenditures and ChanQes in Fund Balance for the Nine Months Ended March 31,1994
2.1
Receive and file the Combining Balance Sheet as of March 31, 1994 and the
Statement of Revenues, ExpenditUres and Changes in Fund Balance for the nine
months ended March 31, 1994.
2.2
Appropriate $189,000 to Account No. 280-199-999-5275 "Assessments" to
pay for assessments due on the Northwest Sports Park property.
The motion was unanimously carried with Agency Member Stone absent.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
None given.
GENERAL COUNSEL'S REPORT
None given.
-1- 05/31/94
Ternecula Redevelopment Agency Minutes
AGENCY MEMBERS REPOI~TS
None given.
Ai~ril 10. 1994
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Agency Member Birdsall; seconded by Agency Member Mufioz to adjourn
at 9:08 PM to a meeting on May 24, 8:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho
Vista Road, Temecula, California. The motion was unanimously carried with Agency Member
Stone absent.
Ronald J. Parks, Chairperson
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk/Agency Secretary
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
......... REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
TUESDAY, MAY 24, 1994
A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency was called to order
Tuesday, May 24, 1994, 9:20 P.M., at the Temecula Community Center, 30875 Rancho
Vista Road, Temecula, California, Chairperson Ronald J. Parks presiding.
PRESENT: 5 AGENCY MEMBERS: Birdsall, Mufioz, Roberts, Stone,
Parks
ABSENT: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None
Also present were City Manager Ron Bradley, Assistant City Attorney Cheryl Kane, and
Deputy City Clerk Susan Jones.
PUBLIC COMMENT
None
AGENCY BUSINESS
1. Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of April 26, 1994.
It was moved by Agency Member Stone, seconded by Agency Member Munoz to
approve staff recommendation.
.The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5 AGENCY MEMBERS:
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 0
AGENCY MEMBERS:
AGENCY MEMBERS:
Birdall, Munoz, RobertS, Stone,
Parks
None
None
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
NOFle
RDAMIN05/24/94 I 06101194
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES MAY 24, 1994 4,
AGENCY MEMBER'S REPORTS
Agency Member Birdsall recommended the criteria for Community Funding should be
consistent with the criteria established for RDA funding.
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Agency Member Stone, seconded' 'by Agency Member Munoz to adjourn
at 9:23 P.M.
The next regular meeting of the City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency will be held on
Tuesday, June 14, 1994, 8:00 PM, at the Ternecula Community Recreation Center, 30875
Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California.
ATTEST:
Chairperson Ronald J. Parks
June S. Greek, City Clerk
RDAMIN05124194
2 06/011g4
ITEM
NO. 2
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT: ·
Executive Director/Board of Directors
Mary Jane McLarney, Finance Officer
June 14, 1994
International Rectifier Owner Participation Agreement
RECOMMENDATION:
1 ) That the Redevelopment Agency conduct a public hearing and,
2) That the board members adopt a resolution entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVING AN OWNER PARTICIPATION
AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AND INTERNATIONAL RECTIFIER, A
CALIFORNIA CORPORATION
DISCUSSION: International Rectifier Corporation (IR) operates a high technology
semiconductor manufacturing plant in Temecula. The plant currently employs an average of
643 people and began operating in Temecula in 1985. IR was founded in 1947 and operates
additional manufacturing facilities in Tijuana, England, Italy and El Segundo, which is also their
headquarters.
IR currently produces 25% of the world market of MOSFET chips. Major customers include
Ford Motor Corp., Delco Electronics Corp., Hewlett-Packard Co., IBM, General Electric and
Matsushita Electronics Corp. Only 8% of the firm's gross sales relate to defense/aerospace
sales.
In order to position the company for the next major growth phase in the chip market and to
maintain their market share, IR has planned a major expansion of their fabrication unit. This
expansion will generate at least 150 new jobs at an average annual salary of $28,000. The
building improvements and equipment required for the expansion will cost $66 million. The
company has received multi-million dollar incentive offers from European countries. Because
the Temecula plant could be modified to accommodate this expansion, the site was included
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 94 -
"~k RESOLU~6N OF THE ]~'~DEVFJK)PMENT AGENCY
OF ~ ~ OF ~ ~O~G ~ O~
P~CWA~ON AG~E~ BY ~ BETWEEN ~
R~E~ID~ AG~ OF ~ C~ OF
~, ~ C~ OF ~ ~
~A~ON~ ~I'~',~:R, A CAL~~
CO~~ON
The Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula does hereby determine, resolve,
and order as follows:
Section 1. Findings. The Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula hereby
makes the following findings:
A. International Recti~er (Owner) has proposed to construct an addition of 40,000
square feet to its existing building to be used for the manufacturing of semiconductors.
B. The total cost of the building and equipment for the new facility should not be
less than $66,000,000.00.
C. Once fully equipped and operating, the facility will create a total of 150 new,
full-time jobs consisting of 40 professional positions, 30 management positions and 80 skilled
labor positions. The avenge annual salary will be $28,000 beginning in 1995.
D. Construction and equipping of the Facility will result in an increase in the
assessed value of the Site of not less than $66,000,000.00. This will result in a Net Tax
Increment due the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, of not less than $190,000.00 per year.
E. Owner was offered financial grants and inducements from foreign countries
worth not less than $20;000,000.00 to locate the Facility outside the United States. In order
to induce Owner to develop the Facility in the United States, specifically in the County of
Riverside, City of Temecula, it is necessary that incentives be offered Owner at a Federal,
County and local level.
F. In order to induce Owner to locate the Facility in Temecula, the following
steps will be taken:
1. The County of Riverside will sell Industrial Development Bonds in the
amount of not less than $25,000,000.00, the pro~eds of which will be loaned to Owner to
construct the Facility (hereinafter referred to as the "Bonds").
2. Security for the Bonds will be provided according to the following
taxes and property tax revenue for the City, County and State.
Based ~n the abo~e '~ndings, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecuh
hereby approves the Owner Participation Agreement by and between the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Teme~ula, the City of Temecula and International Rectifier, a
California Corporation.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPT!~, by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a regular meeting 'on the 14th day of June 1994.
Ronald H.'Roberts, Chairperson
ATTEST:
June S. Greek
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE)ss
CITY OF TEMECULA)
I, June S. Greek, Agency Secretary of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby
certify that Resolution No. 94--- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the
City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 14th day of June, 1994, by the
following vote:
AGENCYMEMBERS:
NOKS:
AGENCYlV!F~MBERS:
ABSENT: AGENCYMEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: AGENCYMF-MBERS:
June S. Greek
City Clerk
mmm
ml
M
NO. 3
APPROVAL ~
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Executive Director/Redevelopment Agency Members
Ronald E. Bradley, Executive Director
June 14, 1994
Authorization of Agreement for Consulting Services for Old Town T.Z.B.G., Inc.
Project
PREPARED BY: Marilyn Whisenand
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Redeveloprnent Agency authorize the Chairperson to execute an agreement with
Wimberly Allison Tong & Goo for architectural and planning services not to exceed $54,620
and with Barton-Aschman for traffic impact analysis not to exceed $34,000. Agreements will
be subject to the approval of the Executive Director and the General Counsel as to final form.
DISCUSSION:
On March 22, 1994, an appropriation of $125,000 was authorized for the purpose of
conducting feasibility studies as required by the Memorandum of Understanding between the
City and Redevelopment Agency of Temecula and T.Z.B.G. Inc. (Zev Buffman). To date,
contracts have been authorized with Price Waterhouse in the amount of $75,000for economic
planning services and Tom Dodson and Associates in the amount of $75,800 for preparation
of an environmental impact report. This authorization will bring the consultant services
authorized to date to ~ total of $239,420, of which T.Z.B.G., Inc. is responsible for one-half.
The scope of work for Barton~Aschman and Wimberly Allison Tong & Goo is fully described
in the attached proposals.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Funds are available for the City's portion of the fees (one-half, not to exceed a total of
$125,000). The balance will be billed to TZBG, Inc.
Attachment: Wimberly Allison Tong & Goo - Proposal
Barton-Aschman Proposal
13 May 1994
Mr. F, on Bradley
City M~n~r
CITY OF TEMEC[31~
43174 Business Park Dr/re
Temecula, CaRfomie 92590
Via I~e irafie
9091694-1999
Subject:
Old Towo Temecula Entertainment Center
Proposal for Professional Services
WAT&G Project No. ~4413
As we discussed, the following describes our R~vised Propsat for professional seNices for the
Master Planning and Pre-Concept Design of thv Old Town Temecula P,,edevelopment Project and
Entertainment Career. This proposal responds ,o your comments and identifies i'Dted fees fror the
work that we will provide. As you are aware, we have already befun work on the project and
have accumulated prof'cssional frees and reimbursebias which we have already billed for services
throu~ the end of Apri L
Although much of the Scope of Work still rem~,ins somewhat unclear, we have attaropted in this
proposal, to identify wha~ we understand is reqnind now and have made assumptions shout what
will be nquired in the rumre. Should the Scop,; of Work be altered in the future to require
additional work, the fees will be adjusted accorjingly. For this Proposal, we have included time
expanded starting with my first meeting with Dave Hogan on 29 March 1994.
Meeting At~:ndance
It was apparent from our tint few meetings that continued attendance by WATt. C} st the various
strategic planhiek work sessions and coordination meetings will be required co:ttinually
throughout the 90-120 day PAD Phase. We have assumed our attendance wil] include
signifiom~t rceetings when the key team members are in L'tendance. In-house mectir~s will be
included in our other Scopes of Work de~ned t, eiow. For this Proposal we have included 8
meetings with a Principal and StaR'Member proroll.
Te|ephnn,, 7]4 S?~, 8St~
r,~c,imile '14 574 aSSO
Wiml~erly Allison 'llm~ & Coo
.t~hit~cts end Plan,er~
lvlr. R0n*B~d]ey
Pale 2
1.t May 199,l
8-~e M~ Devel~ment
This work includes the initial preparation of a comprehensive base map utilizing information
provided by the City and other consultants, to be used u the basis for all f'utu~ design
considerations, This map will 50 updated comirmously as new information is provided. It will
include such information as, present and rumre highways and interchanges; streets, intersections
and bridges; propert)' lines; new, existing, and Igietoric buildings; flood information; land use
districts; civic and community buildings; present and future parking areas, etc. The Ease Map
will be drawn at 1;100 scale.
~l:~zm~ajag,.F*nqibllity Assessment. and Stratalie PlanninE Phase
This work includes the review, comment end ddvelopmant of the architectural program(s) for the
various project components including Zev Buftman's entertainment projlecta; Oene Hancock'e
hotel and reta(I projects; and the various miscellaneous project elements such as the, retail, Food
& byerage, etc,, within the Old Town areL We will meet with the various consultants includinll
the environmental, traffic, market feasibility anti City agencies to provide strategic planninE
recommendations, clsri~y information about the' project program (s), assist in developing the
pro.iect d~:scription. and establish pro. jeer phasi.g alh-matives. In addition, WAT&G will provide
our expenlise in assisting the team with feasibility useassent, overall strategic planning and
product assessment of the viable options to ann 4ider for the entertainment, retail and food &
beverage facilities. This will result in a written report describin8 our recommendations. We will
prepare an existing lot and structures inventor,/and appraisal, iclenUrying the assessors parcel
number and street address of the lot, eanh build ing'e current use, condition end viabiliP/relative
to the proposed project. The results of the assessments will be utilized in the development
the Master Plan and various Pie*Concept Desi~;ns.
M~cl~- Plannlni Phn~
Th is Pha.~c includes the development of numer~ ,us (:~-4) Muter Planning Schemes tier
consideration by the project team. !t will include tb~ identification of.the various project
elements anticipated by Zev Buffman, Gene Hancock, and others identified in the Programming
Phase de~rtbed above. It will also respond to ghe City's Specific Plan. which identifies existing
historic and other structures, establishes eertsin desip and planning guidelines, and new
circulation mutes. It will identify proposed parking areas and establish estimates of'total parking
quantities proposed, in addition to proposed circulation systems for pedestrian, vehicular. and
thereed transportation modes. etc.
Whnherly Alliaon Tong & Coo
and Planners
Mx. 'R0n'Bngl~,
! 3 May I ~)4
As the Master Plan develops, scale and massin~.i of each project component will be emblished.
WATiG will coordinate with the City enitneuin~ or planning departments, as required. This
Phase will remit in the matlon of 34 Sire P~tl oftbe TRC Dinti~ the rune site area and
adjacant signl~e. ant elements of ti~ Old Town .~,t~a imminent In this project The final drawings
will be at 1:!00
We propose to perform our setvies p~r tim foll.>wing Fixed Fee $checlul~. The fees are based
on the staffing hours projected. Additional timt, required or adjustments in the S~ope would be
on a Timo and Materials basis, per the attaebed Discounted Hourly Billin~ Rate S~edule. We
estimate that the work described above, which i~ associated with Gone Hanoeck'a Hot. Is and
hotel related retail, encompasses approximately 10% of our total fees deauibed below.
PHASE ~-~TIMATED HOURS FEE
Meeting Attendanoe - Hourly
Base Map Development
Progremmin~, Feasibility Asseasment
mid Strategic Planning
Master Planning
80 S9,500 ~udget)
75 $s,620
45 S8,000
245 $25,000
In addition to our professional fees. reimbursable expenses such u reproductions, CADD plots.
photos, mounting and framing, 8raphiu coordi.ation, renderings, models and mock-ups, long
distance communications, postage and handling. air travel, auto mileage, hotel and related
expenses, etc., incurred in the interest of this projeb-t by WAT.e'G staff and our eot~ultents, will
be bi lied at l. I times actual cost At this time, we estimate the reimbumables for the project will
total approximately $6,500.
Payments on all services and reimbursables a~c .ine to WAT&G within 30 (thirty) days of
invoice. An interest char$e of 1% per month waif be added to all payments made a~er the 30
(thirty) day neriod.
£0Z~ L'9~ 8~c8V&St, T&:ON ~Sl 9 * I ~ P~:(II SS:P~
Wim}~erly AUim, n Tons ~ Go{,
.4rrlzitev'~J eerl Plmmen
Pqe 4
]3J~dyl~4
Thank you Eor the opportunity tO submit thb Proix}tel, We look forward to continuing our
efforts on the project. Please let me Imm~, ify~u have any questions regarding the
doremen~oned,
Michae! R. Paaeri,
Vice President
Artschment ~, Discounted Hourly BiIIinR Pdte S,:hedule
cc: 7ev Buffman
Marilyn Whtsenand
Michael M. S. Chun
Acceptance:
Ci~ of Temecutn Date
' ~,0c:1 ~9~ BVGBt,,~gf,~Z.:C]N 'lit E) * I ~ fq:al 9g:t,~ ,,5,--e;-A~e..~ ......
WAT&G Newport B~ch-
TEMECULA ENTERTAINMENT CEN FER
WAT&G PROXgCT NO. 9441~
DISCOUNTED HOURLY BILLING RATES
Principals and slaff members will be billed at the following hourly billing fatty:
Note:
POS~ON B!IJ.ING RATg
Principal sis0.00
senior A~ociata $135,00
AMociate $ 100.00
Senior Staff $135.00
S taft L~vel I $ 100.00
Staff'~evel II H0.00
Staff Level Ill S65.00
Staff Level IV $$0.00
Staff Level '~
PhotoFaphy/Graphics $85.00
Marketing. S100.00
CAD Equipment Time $35.00
Overtime r~tes for staff(over 40 bours/~r week) to be 1.3 times billing rote.
These rates are subject to chan~o from nine to time.
9 * I ~ R:Ol &~:~T PG,-£T-hfdlJ ....
!~9 S LOs Ro;les Ave Su;'.e 770 · Pasaaena. Ca{,fc, rr~la 9~ ~01-2460 OSA · 1~18~ ~J,9-39"7 · Fax. :~15; 585-0722
VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS
May 2, 1994
Revised May 13, 1994
Mr. Ronald E. Bradley
City Manager
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590-3606
Attention: Mr. Raymond A. Casey, P.E.
Principal Engineer - Land Development
Department of Public Works
Dear Mr. Bradley:
RE:
PROPOSAL TO PREPARE TWO (2) TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSES OF THE
PROPOSED CITY OF TEMECULA-THE ZEV BUFFMAN GROUP
ENTERTAINMENT FACILITIES IN OLD TOWN TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA
Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc., is please to submit this letter proposal for your
consideration regarding the above-referenced development (hereinafter referred to as the
"Project"). We appreciate this opportunity to provide traffic-related services in the processing
of this development.
The basis for this proposal is as follows:
Information regarding the proposed Project received in "team" meetings on March
21, March 23, and April 5, 1994;
A six-page narrative of the Project (i.e., "1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION" prepared
by Tom Dodson & Associates) received on April 19, 1994, from Tom Dodson &
Associates ,(refer to Attachment A);
A traffic impact analysis "scoping" meeting on April 26, 1994, attended by
representatives of the City of Temecuia; Caltrans; Barton-Aschman Associates,
Inc.; Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCYC); Riverside County
Transportation Department (RCTD); and Valley Research and Planning Associates
(consultant to RCTC);
· Draft Traffic Impact Study Guidelines, City of Temecula, February 14, 1992;
E~"'3~ --%---~St"N~- wpa1951340tterneculB.pro
Mr. Ronald E. Bradley
May 2, 1994
Revised May 13, 1994
Page 2
Draft Riverside County Transportation Commission Traffic Impact Analysis Report
Guidelines, June 23, 1993; and
Comments concerning the original proposal dated May 2, 1994, from Mr.
Raymond A. Casey, City of Temecula.
With respect to the two sets of guidelines, it should be noted that certain variations from
these draft guidelines are proposed herein based upon input and direction received during the
aforementioned "scoping" meeting on March 26, 1994, and from the Southern California
Association of Governments (SCAG) on April 29, 1994. It is Barton-Aschman's
understanding that the Scope of services proposed herein includes those services required to
satisfy the needs of the public agencies responsible for reviewing and approving this Project.
We have subdivided our proposal into the following sections:
Understanding of the Project;
Scope of Services;
Time of Performance;
Cost of Services;
Method of Payment; and
Authorization to Proceed.
Each of these is discussed below.
UNDERSTANDING OF THE PROJECT
Both within and directly west of the City of Temecula's adopted Old Town Temecula
Specific Plan area is proposed the development of a variety of entertainment-related facilities.
These facilities will be constructed by the City of Temecula in cooperation with The Zev
Buffman Group, Inc. (TZBG). With the exception of one hotel, the entire Project is proposed
for completion in 1996.
A traffic impact anaiy. sis (TIA) is required to determine if any adverse impacts on the area
transportation system will result due to the Project's vehicular trip generation. In fact, two
such studies are required: one addressing the requirements of the City of Temecula, and a
second addressing the requirements of the Congestion Management Program (CMP) of RCTC.
This proposal addresses both of these traffic impact analyses.
flARTON,A$CHMAN
ASSOCIATES, INC. wpd~9513401tefnecula.pro
Mr. Ronald E. Bradley
May 2, 1994
Revised May 13, 1994
Page 3
SCOPE OF SERVICES
As cited above, two traffic impact analyses will be prepared, with the results of each to be
summarized in a separate document. One analysis will address the RCTC's requirements for
compliance with CMP Land Use Coordination. The second analysis will address the City of
Temecula's traffic impact requirements. The scope of services for each analysis is presented
below.
RCTC/CMP Traffic Impact Analysis
Based upon direction and input received from RCYC; Valley Research and Planning
Associates (consultant to RCTC); and SCAG's Inland Empire Office, the following
assumptions will be utilized and tasks completed:
1. The study area will consist of the following four CMP segments/links:
a. SR-79 (South) immediately east of 1-15;
b. 1-15 immediately south of SR-79 (South);
c. 1-15 between Rancho California Road and SR-79 (South); and
d. 1-15 immediately north of Rancho California Road.
2. The time period of analysis will be the weekday evening peak hour occurring between
4:00PM and 6:00 PM.
3. In conjunction with Items 1 and 2 above, the following traffic scenarios will be
analyzed:
a. Existing (1994);
b. 1996 assuming no Project development;
c. 1996 assuming partial Project completion, i.e., all Project components with the
exception of one hotel;
d. 2010 assuming no Project development; and
e. 2010 assuming full Project completion.
] BARION-ASCHMAN
ASSOCIATES, INC. wpdt951340tternecula.pto
Mr. Ronald E. Bradley
May 2, 1994
Revised May 13, 1994
Page 4
With respect to the five traffic scenarios included in Item 3 above, the following
parameters and methodologies will apply:
a. Existing (1994)
(1)
1994 directional traffic volumes will be obtained from RCTC. These
volumes will be either actual 1994 volumes or volumes collected in a prior
year(s) and factored by Barton-Aschman to 1994 (utilizing a growth
factor(s) supplied by RCTC or SCAG);
b. 1996 Without Project
(1)
The 1994 volumes described in Item 4.a above will be factored by Barton-
Aschman to 1996 utilizing a growth hctor(s) obtained from RCTC or
SCAG;
c. 1996 With (Partial) Project
(1)
Based upon 1996 Project trip generation and distribution data jointly
developed by Barton~Aschman, the City of Temecula, and TZBG,
assignments of 1996 Project-generated traffic will be made to the four study
segments/links. In order to obtain "1996 With Project" volumes, the 1996
Project traffic volumes will be superimposed directly upon the 1996 non-
Project volumes described in Item 4.b above;
d. 2010 Without Project
(1)
2010 'directional volumes will be obtained from SCAG. If necessary, these
volumes will be "modified" by Barton-Aschman to reflect the elimination of
trips generated by those land uses (assumed in SCAG's 2010 forecast)
which will be "replaced" with Project land uses. As discussed and
confirmed with SCAG, this reduction will be done manually, not via the
SCA. G (or any other) travel demand model. The number of trips to be
eliminated will be obtained from SCAG;
e. 2010 With (Full) Project :
(1)
Based upon 2010 Project trip generation and distribution data jointly
developed by Barton-Aschman, the City of Temecula, and TZBG,
assignments of 2010 Project-generated traffic will be made to the four study
BARTON-ASCHMAN
ASSOCIATES, INC. wpd1951340Jtemecula.pro
Mr. Ronald E. Bradley
May 2, 1994
Revised May 13, 1994
Page 5
segments/links. In order to obtain "2010 With Project" volumes, the 2010
Project traffic will be superimposed directly upon the manually-adjusted
2010 non-Project volumes described in Item 4.d above.
5. Level-of-service analyses for the five traffic scenarios in Item 3 above will be conducted
utilizing CMP criteria established by RCTC. If adverse impacts are projected due to
Project-generated traffic, a program of mitigation will be recommended.
6. The results of Items 1 through 5 above will be summarized in a traffic impact analysis
report. Five copies will be submitted to the City of Temecula for its use and
distribution.
City of Temecula Traffic Impact Analysis
Based upon direction and input received from the City of Temecula, the following
assumptions will be utilized and tasks completed:
1. The study area will consist of the following nine intersections:
a. Rancho California Road-Business Park Drive/Vincent Moraga Drive;
b. Rancho California Road-Di~ Road;
c. Rancho California Road-Front Street;
d. Rancho California Road-l-15 South ramps;
e. Rancho California Road-I-15 North ramps;
f. Front Street-Moreno Road;
g. Front Street-2nd Street;
h. Front Street-Santiago Road;
i. SR-79 (South)-I-15 North ramps; and:
j. SR-79 (South)-I-15 South ramps.
RARTON-ASCHMAN
ASSOCIATES, INC. wpd!951340ttemecula.pro
Mr. Ronald E. Bradley
May 2, 1994
Revised May 13, 1994
Page 6
The time periods of analysis will be the 1994 and 1996 weekday evening peak hour
occurring between 4:00 PM and 6:00 PM; the 1994 and 1996 Saturday peak hour
occurring between 12 noon and 2:00 PM; and the weekday 24-hour period occurring with
General Plan Buildout.
In conjunction with Items 1 and 2 above, the following traffic scenarios will be
analyzed:
a. Existing (1994);
b. 1996 assuming no Project development;
1996 assuming partial Project completion, i.e., all Project components with the
exception of one hotel;
d. General Plan Buildout assuming no Project; and
e. General Plan Buildout assuming ~tll Project completion.
With respect to the five traffic scenarios included in Item 3 above, the following
parameters and methodologies will apply:
a. Existing (1994)
(i)
Weekday (Friday) evening peak-hour turning-movement traffic counts will
be conducted by Barton-Aschman at the ten study intersections between 4:00
PM and 6:00 PM; similar counts also will be conducted on Saturday between
12 no6n and 2:00 PM. (Note: The Saturday time period was determined
based upon a 24-hour count conducted on May 7, 1994, on Rancho
California Road by Barton-Aschman at the request of the City of Temecula.
This period 0f analysis was confirmed with the city on May 11, 1994.)
b. 1996 With6ut Project
(i)
The 1994 volumes described in. Item 4.a above will be factored by Barton-
Aschman to 1996 utilizing a g~:owth factor(s) approved by the City of
Temecula;
1996 With (Partial) Project
BARTON-ASCHMAN
ASSOCIATES, INC, wpdl~51340~temeculs.l}ro
Mr. Ronald E. Bradley
May 2, 1994
Revised May 13, 1994
Page 7
(1)
Based upon 1996 Project trip generation and distribution data jointly
developed by Barton-Aschman and TZBG, assignments of 1996 Project-
generated traffic will be made to the nine study intersections. The peak-
hour assignments of weekday and Saturday Project traffic volumes will
assume, at minimum, the circulation system improvements cited in Section
1.3.B of "1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION," Tom Dodson & Associates (refer
to Attachment A). (Note: Any additional 1996 improvements identified for
implementation by the City of Temecula also will be included.) In order to
obtain "1996 with Project" volumes, the 1996 Project traffic will be
superimposed directly upon the 1996 non-Project volumes described in Item
4.b above. (Note: If the 1996 circulation system improvements could cause
a "reassignment" of 1996 non-Project traffic, a manual reassignment of said
volumes will be made by Barton-Aschman. Such a reassignment will be
estimated based upon the existing volumes at the ten study intersections and
perceived traffic patterns in the area.);
d. General Plan Buildout Without Project
(1)
General Plan Buildout weekday 24-hour volumes will be obtained from the
City of Temecula. These volumes will be provided on a roadway
segment/link basis in a format similar to that illustrated in Attachment B,
Exhibit Y. The precise segments/links will include the roadway
segments/links "connecting" the ten study intersections and any others
deemed necessary by the City of Temecula.
e. General Plan Buildout With (Full) Project
(1)
Based' tipon the roadway system ,assumed for "General Plan Buildout
Without Project" (refer to Item 4.d above), Barton-Aschman will .manually
assign weekday 24-hour Project volumes to the roadway segments/links
utilized in Item 4.d above. These assignments of Project traffic will be
based upon Project trip generation and distribution data jointly developed by
Bar~on-Aschman and TZBG. In order to obtain "General Plan Buildout
With' Project" volumes, the full Project traffic volumes will be superimposed
directly upon the General Plan Buildout non-Project volumes described in
Item 4.d above.
Level-of-service analyses for the five traffic scenarios in Item 3 above will be conducted
utilizing City of Temecula criteria. This will involve intersection capacity calculations
for the 1994 and 1996 weekday and Saturday peak hours. With respect to the General
BARTON-A$CHMAN
ASSOCIATES, INC. wpdl.q513401temec~Jla.pro
Mr. Ronald E. Bradley
May 2, 1994
Revised May 13, 1994
Page 8
Plan Buildout scenarios, segment/link capacity calculations on a weekday 24-hour basis
will be conducted in a format similar to that illustrated in Attachment B, Exhibit Z. For
all scenarios, if adverse impacts are projected due to Project-generated traffic, a program
of mitigation will be recommended.
6. The results of Items 1 through 5 will be summarized in a traffic impact analysis report.
Five copies will be submitted to the City of Temecula for its use and distribution.
Meetings
Meetings will be attended at the request of the City of Temecula and/or TZBG. These could
include "team" meetings, public hearings, "work" sessions, etc.
To date, Barton-Aschman has attended four meetings at the request of the City of Temecula
and/or TZBG. These occurred on March 21, March 23, April 5, and May 3, 1994. In
addition, four additional "team" meetings have been scheduled in May-June 1994 (per Mr.
David Hogan on April 29, 1994). Considering public hearings also will be requi~'ed, it is
therefore conceivable that 10 (±) meetings ultimately will be requested of Barton-Aschman.
Additional Services
It is conceivable that services in addition to those explicitly cited above will be required of
Banon-Aschman, Typical examples could include the conduct of additional technical studies;
responding to comments concerning the traffic reports; and providing assistance during the
environmental review process. We will comply as required to the greatest degree possible.
TIME OF PERFORMANCE
Excluding "Meetings" and "Additional Services," the "Scope of Services" delineated heroin
will be completed within approximately four wee~s following Barton-Aschman's receipt of
(a) the final Project description, (b) approval by the City of Temecula of the Project trip
generation and distribution, (c) all traffic data described heroin from the City of Temecula,
RCTC, and SCAG, a'n,d (d) formal authorization to proceed,
COST OF SERVICES
All services will be completed on a time-and-materials basis utilizing staff rates in effect at
the time of performance, plus reimbursement (at cost) for all directly related expenses. A
listing of billing rates is provided on Attachment C.
BARTON-ASCHMAN
ASSOCIATES, INC. wpd19513401ternecula.pro
Mr. Ronald E. Bradley
May 2, 1994
Revised May 13, 1994
Page 9
All services will be conducted by Barton-Aschman personnel with the exception of the
conduct of peak-hour traffic counts at the ten study intersections and the 24-hour count on
Rancho California Road. These counts will be conducted by Wiltec, a traffic data collection
firm located in Pasadena, California. Wiltec will serve as a subconsultant to Barton-
Aschman, and Wiltec's cost to conduct the counts will be $3,370.00.
Excluding "Meetings" and "Additional Services," the "Scope of Services" delineated above,
including Wiltec's fee of $3,370.00, will be completed for a cost of $24,000.00 to $25,000.00.
We will not exceed $25,000.00 without receipt of client authorization./t is explicitly noted
that this cost estimate assumes that Barton-Aschman's receipt of all traffic data described
herein from the City of Temecula, RCTC, SCAG, and any other public agency or associated
consulting firm will occur at no charge to Barton-Aschman.
With respect to "Meetings," such services will be charged on a straight time-and-expenses
basis, with staff time recorded "portal to portal." For the client's general budgeting purposes,
one three-hour meeting held in Temecula and attended by one Barton-Aschman senior-level
staff member would cost $1,000.00 (_*). Therefore, if 10 such meetings (averaging three
hours per meeting) were ultimately requested by the City of Temecula and/or TZBG (as
discussed previously herein), a cost for meetings of $10,000.00 (~) would result.
With respect to "Additional Services," a cost of services should be determined at the time of
request.
(Note: The three primary consulting staff members who will be assigned to this project
include T. E. Mitchell, P.E., Principal Associate; T. S. Hamilton, P.E., Senior Associate; and
R. Sethuraman, Associate. For this particular project, their hourly billing rates will be
approximately $135, $105, and $65, respectively.)
METHOD OF PAYMENT
Billings for services will be submitted on a four-week basis and are due and payable upon
receipt. Balances on invoices which remain unpaid after 30 days will accrue interest at the
rate of 1.5 percent per. month. Payments due Barton-Aschman are noncontingent upon Project
approval or Project financing and are Barton-Aschman's client's responsibility. Failure to
submit payment within 30 days of invoice date shall be deemed sufficient mason to "stop
work" on the assignment until payment is receiv.ed. Any resultant delay in scheduled
completion date is the full responsibility of the client. Further, in the even legal proceedings
are instituted to collect delinquent payments due Barton-Aschman, the client will be
responsible for court costs, expenses of collection, and reasonable attomey's fees.
BARTON-A$CHMAN
ASSOCIATES, INC. wpdt951340tternecula.pro
Mr. Ronald E. Bradley
May 2, 1994
Revised May 13, 1994
Page 10
AUTHORIZATION TO PROCEED
We are prepared to initiate work on this assignment upon receipt of a signed copy of this
Letter Agreement, thereby signifying client's full understanding and acceptance of the terms
and conditions herein.
Again, we thank you for considering Banon-Aschman in assisting in the approval and
development of your Project. If you have any questions regarding the above, please do not
hesitate to contact us.
Sincerely,
BARTON-ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. ACCEPTED AND APPROVED BY:
Thomas E. Mitchell, P.E.
Vice President
(Signature)
TEM/km
Attachments (A; B; C)
(Typed Name)
(Date)
Authorized to Execute Agreements for:
] BARTON-ASCHMAN
ASSOCIATES, INC. wpdt9513401temecula.pro
1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
1.1 Introdu~ion
In 7777, 1994 the City of Temecula adopted the Old Town Temecuia Specific Plan which
establishes a vision for ~midlng the future development of the hem dTemecula, Old Town-
As stated in the Specific Plan 'the purpose of this Specific PLan document is to assure the
systematic implementation of the General Ean...the doo~nent provides a comprehensive
plan for land use, development reLmlations, design guidelines, vehictdar circulalion, parkln~,
development incentives and other related actions _,_t?,ed at implementing the $oah and
objectives set forth in the General Plan.* The City, in cooperation with Mr. Z. ev
has identified a suite of emerta!~reent facilities that are proposed for development
implement a portion of thc Specific Plan. The proposed facilities will be considered in
Initial Study which will provide the City with the environr, ental tdormation it needs in
order io deter,nine whether an l=~nvlronrne~ls-1 hnpact Report (EIR) must be prepared to
~omply with the California Environmental Quality Ac~ (CEQA).
1.2 project T ocation
The Old Town Specific Plan encompasses the area between l~ancho Cali/ornta Road and
Sanliago Road/Fint Street on the north and south, respecilvely and the 1-15 Freeway on
the easl, and essentially Pujol on the west. An additional area is being inchIdeal as pan of -
the proposed project, south o~ Pujol Street. The topographic map location o£ the site is
shown on the Temecula 7.5' topographic map. Since th!_· area is pan of an old rancho it
has no~ been assigned section numbers. The cadastral location is Latitude 33c :28' North and'
Longitude 117D 09' West. The regionnl location is shown in Figure 1-1 and the area locagon
and topography are shown in Figure 2 which was abstracted from the Mth'Tieta and
Temecula 75' top~raphy rn,ps.
1.3 Pr{~c~ Characlerlsl~
The proposed project encompasses a variety of structures, activity areas, parIcing areas and
circulation system modifications, and hotels. An estimated total of ten new occupiablc
su-ucrares are proposed for construction and as many as two parIcing structures may be
constructed, The entertainment strucwres arc designed to implement the central
enterL,;nment concept of the Old Town Specific Plan (OTSP). Three of the struct~es (the
Wild West A~ena and the lwo hoteis) are located outside of the OTSP and w~l either
rectuire inclusion in the Specific Plan area or will require adoption of a separate
plan in accord with the exlstinS City General Plan requlremen~s for the area. All of these
facilities will be reviewed for adverse impacts from approving, constructing and operating
them as outlined in the following discussion of. project characteristics.
1
A
Attachment _
Entertainment Facllltles
The City. in cocrp~ration w~th Mr. Zev B-fire.-; proposes to construa the following
facilities:
Cabargt Th~atre~ Two ularr. t theatres ar~ proposed to be IDeated ha the Spt~_~,~ Plan corm area at
the proposed location shown ma lrtfdre 3. ~acia Cabaret is propoled to contain about 1~,000 squ~'e feet
(ft~ of area On a L~00O ~t~ footprint. The structttr~ wfil Iz apl~rofimataly 2~ feet ~gla and w~ prc~ide
f~r · ~_~ud sen.7. h&. theatre w~ b~ d~gn~ to ~nt~rtain · maximtun of S00 pr, opl~ at on~
T'~ or~m'a floor va'll provide seating at tabl~ for 400 psrao~ and the balcony w~l provJd~ 200
balmy. Each show is ffp~t~l to last for approxlmataly two hours and it is Initi~ly anticipated
the theater w~ hold ~ show~ per week: one r,]aow per day Monday thru Tnuraday at 7'_~ PM; two
shows on Friday at 7 and 9'~0 PM; four ~ov~ ma Saturday at 12, 5. 8 and 10 PM; and three on $un~,
L~, ~, aml S PM. TI~ ~ar~t tla~u will .host count/and wr. stm-~ mater*-~-,-~t and order
appropriate cabaret acts.
propos~ k~a,_l_m~ thowu on lr~mr~ ~. hch saloon is proposed to contain m ~,,,,~ely ~,0O0 f~ in
a 0;'21~ story str'dcrar~ TIle footpx~t Of t~ building v~ alto be %000 ~.r ]~acja aalo~a ~
d~i_~n~! to enterta~ approximately ~0 p~rr~n~ 2~) at tables and about 100 at tlxe bar or adjacent
A small stage v~ b~ provkl~l for typical bar antert-~,-~nt, such M dancing glr~ $tag~t bar fight~
~oo~outa and other ~utcr~.;,,w~cnt w~l be providc~. The aloona v,411 Tc~ open from .~ to ~ P~ on
Monday tkru Thurt~ay~ open from (. to m~d~ght on Fr~ open from noon to mfa.iE~t on Sa~
and froca noon to l~ PM. Typical ~ ~are wa*~l be prov~scl for patre-~ and wattm'/waitrm ~
Opmra Hous~ An op~a lxou~. t~ proposed to
l~ ~o~ on ~ 3. ~e ope~ bo~e
~ s~r~at~y ~ feet ~ ~ opera bone ~ ~ea~ to en~ ~,~ ~ ~ s~
~ ~d ~ scs~ ~ ~c b~y. Sca~g ~oughout
ud rain ~o ~ o~u~ a~pr~ate~ ~
opera ho~ ~ ~ ~ ~o~; per w~
~ on ~8 foHo~ s~ed~e: M~hy ~ ~s~y 7 PM; F~y 7 ~d 9 PM; ~y ~ ~ 7 ~d
~ f~o~ Xr~d~y m~ ~d ~medy ~o~ ~ rcq~c approValely ~ m~eutu m ~o~.
F~ ~ps ~ f~om mom~u ~m ~cat wute~ mo~es ~ ~ pro~d ~ ~e T~ sh~ on
2
Paveion: A vL-.mal rull~y pavl~on or p~ ~ ~ ~d re~ ~ ~ be
~ of ~ ~ s~: ~t abo~ ~-~ feet) h es~t~ to ~ a~ut ~
five to ~ ~utcs ~ ~e ~er ~ v,--;-~ ~ ~ to fo~ mhut~
a~le ~ ~ lobby ~ ~c ~z ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~c ~z~.
· Quick Draw" Competition .Arm X,, the Old Town core arest a
proposed to contain · quick draw on·pot:talon arcs. The proposed plan and compcddo~ area Ire
shown in Figure 3. Tlfis ~ be · wuter,,{-,'~
walk thzouZh an ouzdoor maze d target,. An inAzvtdua] w~ wear an e~clrontc 2un and It7 to score
u ma.y Ix, i~s u l~f~'~l~ wRhoui 2~ 'removed' f~om ccml~ion. The
w~l be fully v~'blc to -,, aucll~cz surrounding the competition ales. Peopl8 ~ be able to root for
Chef_· favorite person. Ton people can participate in each five minute trip and scores t be ix~ed on
· lsrae elcc~oz~c beard. Wz~uers will S=t
Hotels: Two major 'hotels arc proposecl for conxh-uctlcn in the v~-;.y of the vaqd west erens at the
proposed location show~ on Figure 3. Th~ erea is outside the current bounclar~s of the o'rSP and Gill
have to be broughl into the OTSP or addressed Lu · separate specific plxu. One hotel h proposed to
be foul gcrlel in height and provide · total ~f ~) roomk A 5.7 ac~e psd w~l be provided for this
fac~y which is prol~cnc~ to r,~nxah approximately 141,000 ft~ d spac~ The gc~nd hotel is proposed
~ be · s~x story mr~c~u~ ~th ~0 rooms and about I~0,OG0 fi~ cn a ~ S.7 afro pad. The hc~eis
are fore~ut to coutx~n appr--~,~atel~ 1GG,0~0 f~ d rela~cd retuil space.
L3,B CIrculation ~stem Improvements
'3En order to acco,-~modate the trn~c generated by the entertainment and hotel fac:ifit~es
ou,1~-ecl above, the Ct~ has ldenti~ed a range of circulation ,.vl_ parking system
improvements to enhance at. me flow wi,~;- the OTSP area and the area to the southwest
where the arena _~_ hotels wfil be located. These improve. menU are ov,_~,~ed below end
the locations of each of these improvements is shown on Figure 4.
L
Sizth Street may be ranproved in accord~,,,z with the OTSP z,'~,_,_,,,mondations. It would be tntc~i~
comt to the Pu]ol Strui/Valdcz Av~me intersection, A new bridge 'would be required to crou
Murri~.a Creek.
Vatdez Avenue v~ be ,.-*ended from laneho C-.1;ror~ to Pujol Su,~ incl,,,~-.~ stralghte, ni~ the
~tosd and Vabtez Avenue would be revised to make Dlaz Rosd/Vsld~z Avenue a through rout.
The v/t, stem bypass ~ be constructed fro~ its intcrst,.t|^,, wltTs S.~ato Highway 7g/Interstate 3~
inter~l,-,~ as a four inne divided road. The byptu would be constract~i north un~ ~ ;-t~,'seeu with
an cxansioo of V'sa~.,~t Moragt Drive. Vineout Moraga Drive would be easendr. d to the s~uthwec from
its present ter--;-,zs in the conszruaed indu.~rhi pada to the westera b~pus. Tbls route would z~tuL'~
construction of another bridge aams Murfiea Creek.
The Ma~n Street Bridge w~3 be mod~ed for pcdcstr~n and local trans~Z c~rculatiz, but it
scrv~ u u au~noblle route from east to w~r.t.
]vr. mor tmprovc~emt. t, ~ U fidcwslla and c~rb~ wi~ be installed along Frout $tre~ sou~ of Firs~
Street.
The north bound off-ramp on the I-L~ at Rancho Ca]ifon~ Road ~ be rcczstruct~ to improve
tntSc flow through ~;~ intoration.
Wt~;,, the central portion of Old Town, one of the eut-wesZ streets (Pourt Street, Main Street. or
Third Street) ~ be closed to through traffic cod beam: psn of the plaza. The location of the
vdll vary depena;-=~ upon tha C:i~s conchslon repr,~-=~ the best loculan for IL
During m~or performa~_~-_._, the C~ ~ eonslda. an operating alternative of closing Prom $zreet in
the Old Town tud dirc~.ing r.r&i~c north un Second Street to ~ereedu and thenco to Sixth Street or
Moreno Road to intersect Front Strec.t on the north s~de of Old Town. A]ternath, e]y, trafllc can be
· - 4
SENT BY:TOM DODSON & ASSOC, | 4-19-94; l:l?Pi; 7148898050N 18185850?22;# 6
~fn~:xed south to :!'~ol/Va]dez of the Wuten Bypa~ Some road improw, menu may be made along
the ),·creeds, s, Second Street ud/or Sbcth Street/Motto Road .".~,-enn to facilitate trtelc flew in
thin esu~ DuHn2 major events the project wonld include a vatlet7 of st~,~t e~.e~.;-,--~ acth4des.
$,,,-e form of people ~ system wig be Installed along Main Street from Front Street ~ the Arant
ThJl could Include I themeal ol, m m/stem, f-,,|-ular D's-e;e m/Item, hm'M drawn cets, of · ped~
The ch-culet~m system imi,.-~--~nents that are m*-H.~ to adequate aczss to the proposed facllh3, are anticipated
to be constructed and plm:~l in operation in lg9~. if the projea is approve. d by the ChT. Other improvements
to supper2 It is -^,4~ipated e_}s_et other improvements can be completed in support of tho OT~P wbe~ they ass
appropriate as d~sed in future tra~c smdles. The grc~tsupc in the Old Tow~ area will be censerused to
meet the des~x 2u~dcJines contained in th~ OTSP. Thls can include rolled cttrbs. wooden bosrdwalk, ih'cot
amcxfides (such as bonch=), and covered sfcades.
1.3.C Paricing Facilities
A~cr careful evaluation the city hu concluded ?h~t ccn~q-ed p~ng on ~c p~phe~
of ~e Old To~ ~ be~ ~e ~e l~d ~e ~n~pt ~n~;~ed h ~c ~P, ~c fo~o~g
faddes ~e proposed,
L
Approximately 3,/20 ptrlrh$ spin wig be provided -Inn~ the west ride d Front Street. At 3~. ft3 pet
space, approxhnsely L~ acres of If ca dl.'vOted tO ~&r~S as 2howe In Fl&'llf2 3.
A two store7 Cm height) pszlcing stzuaurc is proposed north of SL~z Strew. It h antlclpeted t~t 300
parldn~ spaces wFtl be pro~a_eA_ in th~s par%a..~ mcrm.= w~,Ich is propof, e~ to be located as shown na
F~re 3. The pa~k~2 su'am~re is prnpos=d to hsve an oppr,,-4,-ste :ZS,000 ~ footprint. P.e.~Jil space
pvx~.; spaces and/~r a par~-_- stn~mrc will be provided adjacent to th~ Arena and the hotsis. ~t is
· -"~pat~ that l,?00 paflch$ spaces ~ be pto~Id~l for the arena on al~rroxlmatel~ 12.7 ac~u d lane
An esH,~eted 8~0 l~'ld~ stalls will be pro'Adcd for th~ hoZeis on an approximete sin sere si~e. These
If required, an overflow l~r~-5 area may be ,.,,,,.,'-used ad.iacc~t to l~jol $1re~t near its
intersection wir~ the western bypasr. S-Pecks· ~rca~ is syllable for 7777 s~ce~ The location is
shown on FzK~re 3.
A total d~,900 permanent parklz~ F, st~. xr= proposed for~_s!lst;~s, to suppo~ the projea ond the OTSP.
1.3.D Procedural Review Requirements
In order to co~su-uc~ these facifities and improvements, the City must euluate and then
approve a m~ster conditional use permit and either an amendment to the Old Town Specific
:.Plan or a new spe~R~ plan for the area currently not located within the Specific Plan, The
master conditional use permit for all of the improvementS will allow future approvals based
upon rcvicw of individual plot p! _~-s for each of ~c proposed facilities or fadlit·e· submitted
in conjunction with each other. The environmental documentation being prepared for t~;~
project evaluates the individual project componentS and it is anticipated that no additional
en~Aro-mentaJ determinations va'll be required once the City makes · decision on the
BENT BY:TOM .~0N & A550G. ; 4-18-84; I:I?PM; ?~48898050N 181~SESQ?22;~ ? ..,
proposed project. Individual building permits would be required prior to construction, but
as lonZ as suchl~ermits conform to the design gnidelinas contained in the OTSP and the
Uniform Bulldiz~ Code such permits are considered ministerial actions under the CEQA.
1.4. Re,oraCle A~encies
The proposed project ~ affect state highway and Interstate right-of-way and Caltn~t
have jurisdiction over imFovements w~th1~ these rights-of-way. Therefore, Caltr~,~= wfil act
a~ a Responsible Agency for the proposed project. The bridge crossings over Murrieta
Creek will require the Cit~ to obtain a 160~ $tre_~m Aberation Agreement from the
Department of Fish and Game (DFG). Also, it it possible that a permit to take an listed
species (the C~l~ornh Gutcatcher) will have to be obtained from DFG. This permit is
termed as '2081" permit and it is issued under the C-~ornia Endangereel Species Act
(CESA). DFG will serve as a Responsible Agency under the CEQA. At this time it does
not appear that anlr air or water permits will be required ~or this project. No other State
agencies have been idemified from which permits my be required.
Permtu ~ be required from the Corps of Engineers foe ~n~*n11;~E the bridges acron
Murrieta Creek (Section 404 Permit). The possibility of affecting the Gutcatcher means
that it my be necessary to obt~ a "take' permit from the U. S. Fish and Wilctlife-Sendce
CFWS). If the consultation for the take permit is conducted through the Corps, it will be
conducted under Section 7 of the federal Endangered Species Act CESA). If the
consultaticm is conducted by the City directly with the FWS,. a Section 10 consultation will
ensue. Because circulation system improvements are proposed to be made wit]~i~ the
Inletstate 15 fighi-d-way, the Federal Highway Aam~Istratian (F'HA). must be consulted
and permits obtained for these improvements. No other federal agencies have been
identified from which permits may be required.
The T~tial Study Envirorm~ental C:bec.lc~t Form follows this project description. It
questions regarding potential impacts of the project for 20 environmental issues.
Substantiating data are provided to support the conclusions contained in the Checlclist Form.
This supportSag data is provided for'all ChecJdist issues, regardless of whether they have
been checked *Yes*, *.Maybe', oe *No'. The environmental setting is provided in the
perfinent section of the substantiating discussion for each issue. Mitigation meso~res and
references are aho cited in each section and mitigation measures are compiled for the whole
documenl foBowing the Mandalory Fiv~i,~gs section of the Checklist. The Ellvironmental
Checklist Form begins on the page followin~ the attached
BUILDOUT AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC [ADT]
24 't:~i,t4Ci40
11 14
19 BALDARAY
5 MERCEDB*
/
LEGEND:
7 -- VEHICI, r_S PER DAY (IO00'S)
SOURCE: WILBUR SMFTH ASc;OCIAI'[S
190
27
5
142
OLD TOWN TEMECULA
SPECIFIC PLAN EVALUATION
Temecula, California
EXHIBIT Y
Attachment B
Z .T.IaIHXH
e!u.~oJ!!eO 'elnoewe.L
NOIJ. VR'IVA9 NV'ld OldlOgdS (~
Y"IIIO]HiIJ, N/~OJ. 010
S3J. VZOOSSV I-U.IINS ~A~"IIM :30~7105
OU.V'~ A,.LIDVciVD-O.L--3P'IN'IOA - c~g-
:C]N303"1
)9'
£9' ·
O~9N'~r'~
L
-,:~
90'
BOllVB AJ, IOV,~VO-OI-:q~R'!OA/nOOqlNB
BARTON-ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC.
Schedule Of Hourly Rates
Rates Effe~ve February 1993
Principal Associate*
Senior Associate*
Associate*
Support
$120.00 - $160.00
$90.00 - $150.00
$60.00 - $90.00
$25.00 - $70.00
Rates for individuals in these categories will be increased by fifty percent (50%) for time
spent in court testimony.
Attachment C