The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About112895 CC AgendaIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting. please contact the office of the City Clerk (909) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting I28 CFR 35.102.35.104ADA Title II] AGENDA TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL A REGULAR MEETING COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER 30875 RANCHO VISTA ROAD NOVEMBER 28, 1995- 7:00 PM 5:30 PM - Closed Session of the City Council/Temecula Redevelopment Agency pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR, Property: Advanced Chemill Systems. 41740 Enterprise Circle North; Negotiating pa~es: Redevelopment Agency of Temecula and Disp0Med; Under negotiation:" Owner Participation Agreement At approximately 9:45 PM, the City Council will determine which of the remaining agenda items can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00 PM and may continue all other items on which additional time is required until a future meeting. All meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 PM. CALL TO ORDER: Invocation: Flag Salute: ROLL CALL: Mayor Jeffrey Stone presiding Reverend Lyle Peterson, Hope Lutheran Church Councilmember Birdsall Birdsall, Lindemans, Parks, Roberts, Stone Next in Order: Ordinance: No. 95-14 Resolution: No. 95-97 R:~,genda\l 12896 I PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 30 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Council on items that are not listed on 1;he Agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council on an item not listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink 'Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk before the Council gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made at this time. A total, not to exceed, ten (10) minutes will be devoted to these reports. CONSENT CALENDAR 2 Standard Ordinance Adootion Procedure RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve the minutes of November 14, 1995. 3 Resolution AODrOvina List of Demands RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 95- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A R:%AOenda~l 12896 2 4 5 Destruction of Records Reouest RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Approve scheduled destruction of certain records as provided under the City of Temecula approved Records Retention Policy. City Treasurer's Reoort as of AuQust 31.1995 RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Receive and file the City Treasurer's Report as of September 30, 1995. 6 7 8 Parcel MaD 28223 (Located north of Winchester Road and west of Diaz Road) RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Approve Parcel Map 28223, subject to the Conditions of Approval. Completion and Acceotance of the Parkview Site RouQh Gradin~ Imorovements. Project No. PW93-09 RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 Accept the Parkview Site Rough Grading Improvements, Project No. PW93-09, as complete; 7.2 Direct the City Clerk to file the Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a one (1) year Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract; 7.3 Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after the filing of the Notice .of Completion if no liens have been filed. Substitute A~reement and Bonds for Traffic Si~nalization Mitigation Fees in Parcel Maps No. 23561-1 and 23561-2 (East .of Jefferson Avenue, North of Santa Gertrudis Creek) RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 Accept the substitute agreement and bond for Traffic Signal Mitigation Fees in Parcel Maps No. 23561-1 and 23561-2; 8.2 Authorize the release of the Traffic Signal Mitigation Fee bond on file; 8.3 Direct the City Clerk to so notify the developers and sureties. R:'~Oendat%1 I 2896 3 9 Release Faithful Performance Warranty, Labor and Material, and Monument Bonds in Tract No. ~715-1 (Southwesterly of intersection of Rancho CalifOrnia Road at Butterfield Stage Road) RECOMMENDATION: 9.1 Authorize the release of Faithful Performance Warranty and Labor and Material bonds for Street, Drainage, and Water and Sewer improvements, and the Subdivision monumentation Bond in Tract No. 22715-1; 9.2 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, the Developer, and the Surety. 10 Award of Contract for the Walcott Corridor, Project PW 94-10 RECOMMENDATION: 10.1 Award a contract for the construction of the Walcott Corridor, Project PW94-10 to Hemet Manufacturing Companyu, Inc., dba Genesis Construction for $1,716,637.50and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract. 10.2 Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders, not to exceed the contingency amount of $171,663.75 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount. 10.3 Adopt a Negative Declaration and approve a Mitigation Monitoring Program for the Walcott Corridor Project. 11 Release Faithful Performance Warranty, Labor and Material, and Monument bonds in Tract No. ~2715-2 (Northwesterly of the intersection of Rancho Vista Road at Butterfield Stage Road) RECOMMENDATION: 11.1 Authorize the release of Faithful Performance and Labor and Material bonds for Street, and Water and Sewer Improvements, and the Subdivision Monumentation Bond in Tract No. 22715-2; 11.2 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, the Developer, and the Surety. R:~l~enda~l 128e6 4 12 Acceotance of Public Streets into the City-Maintained Street System (Within Tracts No. 22715-2, and 22715-F) (Northwesterly of intersection of Butterfield Stage Road at Rancho Vista Road) RECOMMENDATION: 12.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 95- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY- MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM (WITHIN TRACTS NO. 22715-2AND 22715-F) 13 Release Faithful Performance Warrantv. Labor and Material. and Monument Bonds in Tract No. 22715-F (Northwest corner of Rancho Vista Road at Butterfield Stage Road) RECOMMENDATION: 13.1 Authorize the release of Faithful Performance Warranty and Labor and Material bonds for Street, and Water and Sewer improvements, and the Subdivision Monument bond in Tract No. 22715-F; 13.2 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, the Developer and the Surety. 14 Release Faithful Performance Warranty. Labor and Material and Monument Bonds in Tract No. 22716-1 (Southwesterly of intersection of Rancho California road at Meadows Parkway) RECOMMENDATION: 14.1 Authorize the release of Faithful Performance Warranty and Labor and Material bonds for Street, Water, and Sewer improvements, and the Subdivision Monumentat(on Bond, in Tract No. 22716-1; 14.2 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, the Developer and the Surety. R:~&Oenda\l 12896 6 15 Release Faithful Performance Warrantv. Labor and Materials. and Monument Bonds in Tract No. 22716-3 (Northwesterly of intersection of Meadows Parkway at Rancho Vista Road) RECOMMENDATION: 15.1 Authorize the release of Faithful Performance Warranty and Labor and Material bonds for Street, and Water and Sewer improvements, and the Subdivision Monumentation Bond, in Tract No. 22716-3; 15.2 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, the Developer and the Surety. 16 Acceotance of Public Streets into the City Maintained-Street System (Within Tract No. 22716-3) (Northeasterly of intersection of Meadows Parkway at Rancho Vista Road) RECOMMENDATION: 16.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 95- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY- MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM (WITHIN TRACT NO. 22716-3) 17 Final Tract Mao No. 24131-3 (Located westerly of Meadows Parkway, between McCabe Drive and Leena Way) RECOMMENDATION: 17.1 Approve Final Tract Map No. 24131-3 subject to the Conditions of Approval. 18 Award a Contract to Reconstruct Three (3) Desiltinq Ponds in the Santiaao Channel from Valleio Avenue to John Warner Road RECOMMENDATION: 18.1 Award a contract for construction of three (3) desilting ponds in Santiago Channel to Monteleone Excavating, the lowest responsible bidder, for the sum of $11,550.00. R:~ende%112886 8 19 2O 21 Exchange of Real Property between the City of Temecula and the New Community Lutheran Church - Missouri Synod RECOMMENDATION: 19.1 Direct the City Attorney to review the escrow instructions and when satisfactory, the Mayor to sign the Grant Deed to convey the City property to the New Community Lutheran Church - Missouri Synod. Community Services Fundina Reauests RECOMMENDATION: 20.1 Approve the ad hoc subcommittee's recommendation for Community Services Funding requests by Temecula Valley National Little League (TVNLLJ in the amount of $2,500 and TEAM Community Pantry in the amount of $5,000. Plannina AppliCatiOn No. 95-0078. Develooment Aareement for BCI/CCL RECOMMENDATION: 21.1 Adopt an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 95-13 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT OF THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND BCIICCL VENTURE NO. I LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AND BCI/CCL VENTURE NO. 2 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP FOR SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 199, PLANNING AREA 14, MARGARITA VILLAGE, PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA95-0078 RECESS CITY COUNCIL MEETING FOR TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING, TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT MEETING, OLD TOWN/WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY MEETING OLD TOWNIWESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT -AUTHORITY R:~end~112896 7 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING CALL TO ORDER: ROLL CALL: DIRECTORS: PUBLIC COMMENT: President Ronald H. Roberts Next in Order: Ordinance: No. CSD 95-01 Resolution: No. CSD 95-07 Lindemanso Birdsall, Parks, Stone, Roberrs A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Board of Directors on items that are not listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Board of Directors on an item not listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk before the Board of Directors gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors, should present a completed pink "Request to Speak" to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address for the record. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the minutes of November 14, 1995. DISTRICT BUSINESS 2 Naming of a Newly AcQuired Park Site RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Name the newly acquired park site "The Duck Pond". R:'LAgende~l 12896 8 DEPARTMENTAL REPORT GENERAL MANAGERS REPORT - Bradley DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT - Nelson BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS ADJOURNMENT: Next meeting: December 12, 1995, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. R:'v~ende%l 12896 8 TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING' Next in Order: Ordinance: No. RDA 95-01 Resolution: No. RDA 95-08 CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Ronald J. Parks presiding ROLL CALL: AGENCY MEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Roberrs, Stone, Parks PUBLIC COMMENT: A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Redevelopment Agency on items that are not listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Agency on an item not listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk bef0r~ the Agency gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. CONSENT CALENDAR I Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the minutes of November 14, 1995. 2 Revision to the Facade Improvement Rebate Prooram RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve the revision to the Facade Improvement Rebate Program. R:~Agend~112896 10 PUBLIC HEARING Any person may submit written comments to the Redevelopment Agency before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing. 3 Professional Hosoital SuDolv Owner Particioation Ac~reement RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Open the public hearing and continue it to the meeting of December 12, 1995. AGENCY BUSINESS 4 Consideration of RDA Commercial Rehabilitation Small Business Loan RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Consider approval of an RDA small business loan to the Health Zone (natural/health food store) to b~ located at the Temecula Plaza, Ynez and Solana Way. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT AGENCY MEMBER'S REPORTS ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: December. 12, 1995, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. R:%A~ende~l 12896 11 OLD TOWN WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY Next in Order: Resolution No.: No. FA 95-06 CALL TO ORDER: President Patricia H. Birdsall ROLL CALL: Lindemans, Parks, Roberts, Stone, Birdsall PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Council on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to two (2).minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council about an item not listed on the Agenda a pink "Request To Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address. 1 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: ' 1.1 Approve the minutes of November 14, '1995. PUBLIC HEARING Any person may submit written comments to the Board of Directors before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be limited to raising 0nly those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing. 2 Financino for Old Town Area Public Imorovements and the Western Bvoass Corridor RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Continue the four (4) Public Hearings listed below to the meeting of December 12, 1995: CFD I Intention to Establish a CFD and to Authorize the Levy of Special Taxes CFD 2 Intention to Establish a CFD and to Authorize the Levy of Special Taxes CFD I Intention to Incur bonded Indebtedness of the Proposed CFD No. 1 CFD 2 Intention to Incur Bonded Indebtedness of the Proposed CFD No. 2 R:~.gendYd 128~6 12 ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: December 12, 1995, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. Ft:~4ende%I 12896 13 · CALL TO ORDER: President Particle H. Birdall ROLL CALL: PUBLIC CONHVIENTS Lindemans, Parks, Roberrs, Stone, Birdnil A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Council on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council about an item not listed on the Agenda 'a pink 'Request To.Speak' form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address. CONSENT CALENDAR I Minutf~s RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the minutes of November 14, 1995. ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: December 12, 1995, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. R:%A0e~cle%112896 14 RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARINGS Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing. 22 Draft Develooment Code RECOMMENDATION: 22.1 Open the public hearing and receive public testimony; 22.2 Adopt a Negative Declaration; 22.3 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 95- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING CERTAIN GENERAL PLAN LAND AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN 22.4 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 95- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING 'THE DEVELOPMENT CODE AND CONSISTENCY ZONING MAP AND AMENDING THE 'ZONING MAP OF THE CITY TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE GENERAL PLAN DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS CITY MANAGER'S REPORT CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: December 12, 1995, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. R:%Aeend8%112696 ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: December 12, 1995, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. R:~Agenda\l 12886 ITEM 1 ITEM 2 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL HELD NOVEMBER 14, 1995 A regular meeting of the Temecula City Council was called to order at 7:04 PM at the Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Street, Temecula, California. Mayor Pro Tem Karel Lindemans presiding. PRESENT: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Parks, Roberrs ABSENT: I COUNCILMEMBERS: Stone Also present were City Manager Ronald Bradley, City Attorney Peter M. Thorson, and City Clerk June S. Greek. EXECUTIVE SESSION A meeting of the City of Temecula City Council was called to order at 5:38 PM. It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Roberrs to adjourn to Executive Session pursuant to Government Code Sections: 1. §54956.8, CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR, Property: 27500 Jefferson Avenue. Negotiating parties: Temecula Redevelopment Agency, Jan Weilert RV and Donna L. Reeves Trust, Under negotiation: lease terms - term and payment. 2. §54956.8, CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR, Property: Assessor's Parcel No. 921-740-001, Murrieta Creek south of Winchester Road; Assessor's Parcel No. 921-280-013, Murrietta Creek south of Rancho California Road. Negotiating parties: City of Temecula, KRDC and Riverside County Flood Control District; Under negotiation: terms and payment. 3. §54956.9, CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL, EXISTING LITIGATION, Indian Child Welfare, et al v. City of Temecula; Copeland vo City of Temecula et. al. 4. §54956.9(b), CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL, ANTICIPATED LITIGATION, significant exposure to litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(b), two cases. The motion was unanimously carried with Mayor Stone absent. r:\minutes\l 11495 -1- INVOCATION The invocation was given by Pastor Robert Cash, Shepherd's Footsteps International Ministry. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The audience was led in the flag salute by Councilmember Roberts. PRESENTATIONS/ PROCLAMATIONS Assemblyman Bruce Thompson addressed the City Council and offered his support in assisting the City with local issues. Mayor PrO Tem Lindemans invited Assemblyman Thompson to join the Council on the dias to hear Item No. 8 regarding Library Funding. PUBLIC COMMENTS Larry Rinehart, representing South Coast Air. Quality Management District, gave a brief update on the District and distributed information packets to the Council. Kay Cassaro, 31616 Paseo Goleta, addressed the City Council requesting the Overland Overpass be expedited and not put off in favor of Rancho California Overpass improvements. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS None given. CONSENT CALENDAR Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans removed Item 8 from the consent calendar and hearing no objections, reordered the agenda to take Item 8 out of order. 8. Resolution Statinq the City'of Temecula's Commitmentto Library Funding Senior Management Analyst Allie Kuhns presented the staff report: Assemblyman Thompson stated he would like to look at cuts to other services and see how the library relates. Councilmember Birdsall stated that without the financial assistance of the City of Temecula, the City of Murrieta and the County of Riverside, the hours at the Temecula Library would have been seriously reduced. She also advised that these funding supplements provide only for a short-term solution. Assemblyman Thompson informed the Council that no money will be allocated by the State until July I st. -2- r:\minutes%111495 It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Roberrs to approve staff recommendation as follows: 8.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 95-93 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA STATING THE COMMITMENT OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA TO RECOVER STATE LIBRARY FUNDING WHICH HAS BEEN WITHDRAWN The motion was unanimously carried with Mayor Stone absent. Mayor Pro Tern Lindemans thanked Assemblyman Bruce Thompson for his visit and concern for local issues. CONSENT CALENDAR City Clerk June Greek announced staff has requested that Item 28 be continued to the meeting of November 28, 1995. Councilmember Parks asked if FY94-96 should be corrected to FY 95-96 on Items 14 and 15. Staff will make any necesary corrections. Councilmember Parks registered an abstention on Item 2.3 and Item 11. Councilmember Roberts requested the removal of Item No. 21 from the Consent Calendar. It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Parks to approve Consent Calendar Items 1-7, 9-20 and 22-27, with Councilmember Parks abstaining on Items 2.3 and 11 and Item No. 28 will be continued to the meeting of November 28, 1995. The motion was carried as follows: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: Standard Ordinance Adoorion Procedure 1.1 Birdsall, Lindemans, Parks, Roberrs None Stone Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. r:\minutes\l 11495 -3- Minutes 2.1 Approve the minutes of October 10, 1995. 2.2 Approve the minutes of October 12, 1995. 2.3 Approve the minutes of October 17, 1995. Councilmember Parks abstained on 2.2. Resolution ADOrovina List of Demands 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 95-91 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A Destruction of Records Reouest 4.1 Approve scheduled destruction of certain records as provided under the City of Temecula approved Records Retention Policy. Out-of-State Travel 5.1 Authorize certain out-of-state travel plans. Liability Insurance Renewal 6.1 Approve the City of Temecula Liability Insurance Policy Renewal with Insurance Company of the West for the period of December 1, 1995 through December 1, 1996. Deleaation of Authority in Processing and Settling Claims AQainst City of Temecula 7.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 95-92 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DELEGATING TO THE CITY MANAGER AND THE CITY CLERK CERTAIN POWERS AND AUTHORITY IN CONNECTION WITH CLAIMS FILED AGAINST THE CITY r:~minutee\l 11495 -4- 10. 11. Acceotance of Public Streets in the City-Maintained Street System (Within Tracts No. 20703-3, and 22962) (Southeasterly of Winchester Road, Southerly of Nicolas ROad) 9.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 95-93 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY MAINTAINED-STREET SYSTEM (WITHIN TRACTS NO. 20703-3 AND 22962) Acceot Public Imorovements in Tract No. 20703-3 10.1 10.2 10.3 Accept the Public Improvements in Tract No. 20703-3; Authorize the reduction in Faithful Performance Street, Drainage, and Water and Sewer Bond amounts and the release of the Subdivision Monumentation Bond; Accept the Faithful Performance Warranty Bond Riders, and Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, the developer and surety. Release Grading Bond for Imoort to School Site (Southeast of Winchester at Margarita Road Intersection) -11.1 Authorize release of Grading Bond for Import of Soils to Chapparal High School Site; 11.2 The motion carried as follows: Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Permittee and Surety. AYES: 3 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Roberts NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Stone ABSTAIN: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Parks r:\minutes%111495 -5- 12. 13. 14. 15. Release Public Improvement Warrantv, Labor and Material. and Monument Bonds in Tract No. 21674-3 (Southwest of intersection of Rancho California Road at Meadows Parkway) 12.1 Authorize the release of Faithful Performance Warranty and Labor and Material bonds for Street, Sewer and Water Improvements, and Subdivision Monumentation in Tract No. 21674-3; 12.2 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Surety and Developer. Release Gradina Bond for Tract No. 21067 (Northerly of Intersection of Pala Road at Loma Linda Road) 13.1 Authorize release of Grading Bond for Tract No. 21067; 13.2 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Surety. Solicitation of Construction Bids for FY94-95 Annual Pavement Manaoement Project. PW95-06 14.1 Approve the plans and specifications and authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit public construction bids for FY94-95 Annual Pavement Management Project No. PW95-06. Professional Services Aareement with Enaineerina Ventures. Inc. for Rancho California Road and Santa Cecilia Drive Sidewalk Imorovement Project No. 5 15.1 Award a contract for the design of Rancho California Road and Santa Cecilia Drive sidewalk improvement project to Engineering Ventures, Inc., for $10,950.00 and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract. 15.2 Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $1,095.00 which is equal to. 10% of the contract amount. 15.3 Authorize a transfer of $9,636.00 of Development Impact Fees (Public Facilities) to the Capital Projects Fund. 15.4 Appropriate $49,079 in the Capital Projects Fund to Account No. 210-165- 661-5804 for the total costs to complete this project. 16. Walcott Corridor Reimbursement Aareements with R.C.W.D. for Work Performed Durina the Construction, Proiect PW94-10 16.1 Approve reimbursement agreement with the Rancho California Water District for the cost of relocation of certain water improvements made necessary by the Walcott Corridor, Project PW94-10. r:~minutes~l 11495 -6- 17. 18. Professional Geotechnical Services Contract with Law/Crandall. Inc. for Walcott Corridor. Proiect PW94-10 17.1 Award a contract for Professional Geotechnical Services for the Walcott Corridor, Project PW94-10 to Law/Crandall, Inc. for $34,565.00 and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract. 17.2 Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $3,456.50 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount. Award of Contract for RiQht-Of-Way Weed Control Pre-Emeraent and Post-Emerqent AppliCations. Project No. PW95-24 18.1 Award a contract for Right-Of-Way Weed Control Pre-Emergent and Post- Emergent Applications, Project No. PW95-24 to Pestmasters Services of Temecula in the amount of $25,755.47 and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract. 18.2 Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $2,575.55 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount. 19. Award 19.1 19.2 19.3 of Contract for City Wide Riqht-Of-Way Tree Trimming Proaram Reverse the decision to award Citywide Right-of-Way Tree Trimming Program to Arbor-Pro Tree Service. Award a contract for Citywide Right-of-Way Tree Trimming Program to L. Willlares Landscaping, Inc. for $16,880.00and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract. Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $1,688.00 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount. 20. Award 20.1 20.2 of Contract for FY95-96 City Wide A.C. Street Repair Project No. PW95-20 Award a contract for FY 95-96 Citywide A.C. Street Repair, Project No. PW95-20 to Hillcrest ConstrUction in the amount of $57,110.00 and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract. Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $5,711.00which is equal to 10% of the contract amount. r:\minutes%111495 -7- 22. Comoletion and Acceptance of the Rancho Vista/Mira Loma Dr. Sidewalk ImPrOvements, Proiect No. PW94-19 22.1 Accept the Rancho Vista/Mira Loma Drive Sidewalk Improvements, Project No. PW94-19, as complete; 22.2 Direct the City Clerk to file the Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a one (1) year Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract; 22..3 Direct the City Clerk to release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after the filing of the Notice of Completion if no liens have been filed. 23. 24. Completion and AcceDtance of the Access Ramos, Project No. PW95~04 23.1 23.2 23.3 Accept the Access Ramps, Project No. PW95-04, as complete; Direct the City Clerk to file the Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a one (1) years Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract; Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after the filing of the Notice of Completion if no liens have been filed. "No Parkina" Zones on the East Side of Front Street from SR 79(S) to SantiaQo Road 24.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 95-95 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING "NO PARKING" ZONES ON THE EAST SIDE OF FRONT STREET FROM SR 79(S) TO SANTIAGO ROAD ADJACENT TO ALL DRIVEWAYS 25. Award of Construction Contract for Parkview Site Improvement Project, Phase 1, Fire Station 84- Project No. PW95-09CSD 25.1 Approve the plans and specifications and award a contract for Parkview Site Improvement Project - Phase 1, Fire Station 84, Project PW95-09CSD, to Great West Contractors for the base bid and the two 'alternates in the amount of $1,970,842.46and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract; r:\minutes\l 11495 -8- 26. 25.2 Authorize the Mayor to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $197,084.24which is equal to 10% of the contract amount. Approve Grant of Easements for Walcott Corridor, Project PW94-10 26.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 95-96 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING OFFERS OF DEDICATION FOR PUBLIC ROAD AND DRAINAGE PURPOSES EASEMENTS ON WALCOTT LANE AND LA SERENA WAY 27. 28. Award 27.1 Award 28.1 28.2 28.3 of Bid for Replacement Network Server for City Hall Award a bid for the purchase of the replacement network server for City Hall, Bid Number 95-33 to Inacom Information Systems, San Diego, California for $37,711.42. of Contract for the Walcott Corridor. Project PW94-10 Award a contract for the construction of the Walcott Corridor, Project PW94- 10 to Hemet Manufacturing Company, Inc. dba Genesis Construction for $1,716,637.50and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract. Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $171,663.75 which is equal to 10% of the contract 8mount. Adopt a Negative Declaration and approve a Mitigation Monitoring Program for the Walcott Corridor Project. 21. Award of Contract of FY95-96 Citywide P.C.C. RepairS Project No. PW95-21 Councilmember Roberts asked if there will be 'a problem with numerous change orders on this contract because it came in so far under the estimate. Public Works Director Kicak answered that the estimate may have been somewhat inflated and due to the economy, the contract came in well under the estimate. Councilmember Parks expressed concern that the roads be maintained properly. r:\minutes\l 11495 -9- It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Parks to approve staff recommendation as follows: 21.1 Award a contract for FY 95-96 Citywide P.C.C. Repairs, Project No. PW95- 21 to West Coast Construction in the amount of $38,951.00and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract. 21.2 Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $3,895.10 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount. The motion was unanimously carried with Mayor Stone absent. RECESS Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans called a recess at 7:42 PM. The meeting was reconvened following the Community Services District Meeting, the Redevelopment Agency Meeting, the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority meeting and the Old Town Westside Improvement Authority meeting at 7:54 PM. PUBLIC HEARING 29. Plannine ADDlication No. 95-0078. Develooment Agreement for BCI/CCL Community Development Director Gary Thornhill presented the staff report and read a letter into the record from James Horn, a member of the Chardonney Homeowners Associatio.n Board, expressing his opposition to any reduction in Development Impact Fees. Mayor Pro Tern opened the public hearing at 8:10 PM. Charlie Kluger, 4300 Fir Avenue, Seal Beach, representing BCI/CCL spoke in favor of staff recommendation and stated the recreation area will be completed in a timely manner. 'Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans closed the public hearing at 8:11 PM. r:\minutes\l 11495 -1 O- It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Roberrs to approve staff recommendation as follows: 29.1 Adopt the Negative Declaration for PA95-0078; 29.2 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 95-13 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT OF THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND BCI/CCL VENTURE NO. I LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AND BCI/CCL VENTURE NO. 2 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP FOR SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 199, PLANNING AREA 14, MARGARITA VILLAGE, PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA95-0078 The motion was unanimously carried with Mayor Stone absent. 30. Renamina of Temecula Library Senior Management Analyst Allie Kuhns presented the staff report. Councilmember Birdsall expressed concern that this was not going before the Murrieta City Council for a similar action on that City's behalf. It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Roberts to continue this matter to the meeting of December 12, 1995, and to direct that the .Task Force make the City of Murrieta representatives aware of the Council's position that the Murrieta City Council should adopt a similar resolution. The motion was unanimously carried with Mayor Stone absent. Community Services Fundina Ad Hoc Subcommittee Finance Director Genie Roberts presented the staff report. It was moved by Councilmember Roberts, seconded by Councilmember Parks to appoint Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans and Councilmember Birdsall to serve for the remainder of the year on an ad hoc subcommittee to review two (2) applications for the FY 1995-96 Community Services Funding program. The motion was unanimously carried with Mayor Stone absent. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT None given. r:\minutes~l 11495 -11- CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT City Attorney Thorson reported on the Closed Session, stating that no action was taken that requires public reporting. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Roberts to adjourn at 8:25 PM to a meeting on November 28, 1995, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. The motion was unanimously carried with Mayor Stone absent. ATTEST: Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor June S. Greek, City Clerk . r:\minutes\l 11495 -12- ITEM 3 RKqOLUTION NO. 9.$- A RESOLUIION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A, on file in the Office of the City Clerk, have been audited by the City Manager, and that the same are hereby allowed in the mount of $1,525,397.13 Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 28th day of November, 1995. ATTEST: Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk' [SEAL] RetotX87 I STATE OF CAJ,.IFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMECULA) I, lune S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby do certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 95- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 28th day of November, 1995 by the following roll call vote: COUNCILMF, MBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMI=~MBERS: June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk l~soa~87 2 CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS /09/95 TOTAL CHECK RUN: /16/95 TOTAL CHECK RUN: /28/95 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 11/16~95 :TOTAL PAYROLL: 55,637.86 150,309.79 1,197,128.75 122,320.73 TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR '11/28/95 COUNCIL MEETING: DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND: CHECKS: 001 GENERAL $ 691,322.52 100 GAS TAX 19,105.90 110 RANCHO CALIF ROAD REIMB DIST 0.00 120 DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FUND 0.00 140 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT 0.00 165 RDA-LOWIMOD 4..441.14 190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 28, 174.72 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 8.906.02 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 22.210.66 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 5,235.23 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 221 .,54 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ (CIP) 581,932.82 220 MARGARITA ROAD REIMB. DIST. 0.00 250 CAPITAL PROJECTS - TCSD 0,00 280 RDA-CIP 18,038.99 300 INSURANCE 835.37 310 VEHICLES 0.00 320 INFORMATIONS SYSTEMS 14,081.45 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 5,037.52 340 FACILITIES 1,267.55 380 RDA-DEBT SERVICE 0.00 390 TCSD DEBT SERVICE 2,264.97 PAYROLL: 001 GENERAL $ 74,661.12 100 GAS TAX 15,377.18 165 RDA-LOWIMOD .456.33 190 TCSD 20,348.61 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 624.70 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 646.52 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 2,424.82 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 397.47 280 RDA-CIP' 1,900.36 300 INSURANCE 589,25 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 1,286.24 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 721.35 340 FACILITIES 2,686.78 TOTAL BY FUND: ~REPARED Y'THER~SA~.a~ . HEREBY CERTIFY :HAT THE ~RECTOR OF FINANCE RONA~D E. BRADLEY, CITY MAh~'~ER (,~ $ 1,525,397.13 $ 1,403,076.40 122,320.73 $ 1,525,397.13 FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. VOUCHRE2 1 '1/09/95 14:44 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERZOOS PAGE FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 100 GAS TAX FUND 165 RDA DEV- LOW/MOO SET ASIDE 190 COHMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B ' 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND 280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP 300 INSURANCE FUND 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 340 FACILITIES TOTAL AMOUNT 22,895.76 5,011.59 37.08 12,992.14 1,564.47 12.15 2,461.11 33.85 3,851.68 1,168.25 11.95 3,861.46 1,320.05 416.32 55,637.86 VOUCHRE2 11/09/95 "IO*JCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 26255 26259 26260 26260 26261 26262 26263 2626~ 26265 26265 26265 26266 26266 26266 26266 26266 26266 26266 26266 26266 26267 26268 26269 26269 26270 26271 26272 262T~ 26274 2.6274 26275 26276 26276 14:44 CHECK DATE 11/03/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 VENDOR NUMBER 000905 001674 00194? 001947 002056 001718 000484 000638 000638 000638 000127 000127 000127 000127 000127 000127 000127 000127 000127 001217 000135 001195 001195 001275 000979 001669 00166.9 001313 000165 000165 VENDOR NAME TEMECULA SHUTTLE SERVIC ADKINS, ROBERT STEVEN AMERIGAS AMERIGAS AUTO PARK CAR STEREO & BARTON, JUDITH BEJING LONGEVITY, INC. CALIFORNIA ASSOC LOCAL CALIFORNIA DEPT OF CONS CALIFORNIA DEPT OF CONS CALIFORNIA DEPT OF CONS CALIFORNIAN CALIFORNIAN CALIFORNIAN CALIFORNIAN CALIFORNIAN CALIFORNIAN CALIFORNIAN CALIFORNIAN CALIFORNIAN INC. -LEGA INC. -LEGA INC. LLEGA INC. -LEGA INC. -LEGA INC. -LEGA INC. -LEGA INC. -LEGA INC. -LEGA CENTER FOR CONTINUING S CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER CENTRAL SECURITY SERVIC CENTRAL SECURITY SERVIC COMPUSERVE, INC. CORTES, ANTON]A CROSSLEY, DEBRA DEL RIO ENTERPRISE DUNN EDgARDS CORPORATIO DUNN EDWAPJ)S CORPORATZO FAGAN, MATTHEW FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION TRANSPORT: EXCH-STUDENTS/LAX TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS PROPANE FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES PROPANE FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES MOTORCYCLE MAINT REFUND-TCSD CLASS REGISTRATION TCSD ]NSTRUCTOR EARNINGS ECONOMIC DEV CONF:MJM:11/30-12 3RD QUARTER S.N,I. FEES 3RD QUARTER S.M.l, FEES 3RD QUARTER S.M.I. FEES PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICES PUBLIC NOTICES PUBLIC NOTICES PUBLIC NOTICES PUBLIC NOTICES PUBLIC NOTICES OVRCHG AD(TOO188514)&OVR PRINT OVRCHG AD(TOO188514)&OVR PRINT BOOK:CAL ECONOMIC GROWTH 1995 M/SC, HARDWARE FOR SIGNS CRC ALARM MONITORING SERVS SR CENTER ALARM MONITORING SUBSCRIPTION-COMPUTER MAGAZINE REFUND-SECURTIY DEPOSIT REFUND-TCSD CLASS REGISTRATION RESTORATION ON MARGARITA RD CREDIT:RECYCLED GRAFFITI PAINT RECYCLED GRAFFZTI PAINT CONF:CCAPA 9/30-10/3 M FAGAN EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES ACCOUNT NUMBER '001-100-999-5280 190-183-999-5330 001-162-999-5263 190-180-999-5263 001-170-999-5214 190-18~-4982 190-183-999-5330 001-110-999-5258 001-2280 001-2290 001-162-4229 001-120-999-5256 001-161-501-5256 001-161-502-5256 001-120-~-5256 001-161-501-5256 001-161-502-5256 001-120-999-5256 001-161-502-5256 001-120-999-5256 001-110-999-SZ28 100-164-601-5244 190-182-999-5250 190-181-999-5250 320-199-999-5228 190-2900 190-183-4982 100-164-601-5401 100-164-601-5218 100-164-601-5218 001-161-501-5258 320-1~-9~-5230 190-180-999-5230 ITEM AMOUNT 400.00 242.40 273.58 265.58 47.50 42.00 76.00 199.00 1,899.33 2°894.42 239.68- 8.52 147.26 153.32 120.03 29.43 298.14 75.56 243.94- 10.45- 210.11 743.26 50.00 45.00 10.25 100.00 20.00 875.00 127.68- 131.67 180.49 20.25 25.00 PAGE I CHECK AMOUNT 400.00 242.40 539.16 47.50 42.00 76.00 199.00 4,554.07 575.87 210.11 743.26 95. O0 10.25 100.00 20.00 875. O0 180.49 45 VOUCHRE2 PAGE 2 11Z_09/95 14:44 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 262~ 262~ 26278 26279 26279 26280 26280 26280 26281 26282 26282 26282 26283 26283 26283 26283 ~z~83 26284 26284 26285 26285 26285 26285 26285 26286 26287 26288 26289 26290 26291 2.6291 26291 26292 .z~93 CHECK VENDOR VENDOR DATE NUMBER NAME 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 001135 FIRST CARE INDUSTRIAL M 001135 FIRST CARE INDUSTRIAL M FLESURAS, MELODY 000643 FORTNER HARDWARE, INC. 000643 FORTNER HARDWARE, INC.' 000184 000184 000184, G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 001355 G T E CALIFORNIA, INC. 001164 GABRIEL, RICHARD 001164 GABRIEL, RICHARD 001164 GABRIEL, RICHARD 000177 000177 000177 000177 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT 000364 GREEK, JUNE S. 000364 GREEK, JUNE S. 000364 GREEK, JUNE S. 000186 HANKS HARDWARE, INC. 000186 HANKS HARDWARE, INC. 000186 HANKS HARDWARE, INC. 000186 HANKS HARDWARE, INC. 000186 HANKS HARDWARE, INC. HARE, PATRICIA 001517 HEALTH & HUMAN RESOURCE 000962 ] C M A - WASHINGTON 001407 INTER VALLEY POOL SUPPL KELLER, DERICC] 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE 002023 KING, WENDE KOBYLSKI, KATY CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION PRE-ENPLOYMENT PHYSICAL COSTS EMPLOYEE EXAMINATION REFUND-TCSD CLASS REGISTRATION TCSD MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES MISC. PAINT SUPPLIES 909 695-3539 GEM USAGE 909 699-0128 GEN USAGE 909 699-2309 GEM USAGE MNTHY ACCESS CHGS 10/28-11/27 RENT FOR CITY YARD/FRONT ST RENT FOR CITY YARD/FRONT ST RENT FOR CITY YARD/FRONT ST OFFICE SUPPLIES MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES M1SC OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES LEAGUE OF CITIES CONF:10/20-24 LEAGUE OF CITIES CONF:10/20-24 LEAGUE OF CITIES CONF:10/20-24 'MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES FOR PARKS MAINT SUPPLIES-CITY HALL MISC SUPPLIES/SPORTS PROGRAM MA/NTENANCE SUPPLIES FOR PARKS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES FOR PARKS REFUND-TCSD CLASS REGISTRATION EAP SERVICES ICMA MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL 1996 CRC POOL CHEMICALS/OCT REFUND-TCSD CLASS REGISTRATION TEMP HELP W/E 10/29 EVANS TEMP HELP W/E 10/29 EVANS TEMP HELP W/E 10/29 EVANS TCSD INSTRUCTON EARNINGS REFUND-SECURITY DEPOSIT ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-150-999-5248 190-180-999-5250 190-183-4982 190-180-999-5212 100-164-601-5218 320-199-999-5208 320-199-999-5208 320-199-999-5208 320-199-999-5208 100-164-601-5234 190-180-999-5234 001-162-999-5234 190-182-999-5220 190-182-999-5220 190-182-999-5220 001-120-999-5220 001-110-999-5220 001-120-999-5258 001-1170 001-1170 190-180-999-5212 340-199-999-5212 190-183-999-5380 190-180-999-5212 190-180-999-5212 190-183-4982 001-150-999-5250 001-110-999-5226 190-182-999-5212 190~183-4982 001-165-999-5118 001-165-999-5118 100-164-604-5118 190-183-999-5330 190-2900 ITEM AMOUNT 90.00 45.00 42.00 151.40 1.57 35.55 1,021.90 28.75 350.00 440,00 352.00 88.00 37.71 87.81 10.56 260.85 77.92 106.00 23.73 23.73- 51.66 51.23 73.15 496.13 409.55 42.00 338.35 878.62 277.46 42.00 94.03 94.03 94.04 448.00 100.00 CHECK AMOUNT 135.00 42.00 152.97 1,086.Z0 350.00 880. O0 474.85 106.00 1,081.72 42.00 338.35 878.62 277.46 42.00 282.10 448.00 100.00 VOUCHREZ 11/09/95 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 26294 26295 26296 26297 26298 26299 26300 26301 2~02 26302 26302 26302 26303 26304 26304 26304 26304 26305 26306 26306 26306 26307 26308 26309 26310 26310 26310 26310 26310 26310 26311 26311 26311 26311 14:44 CHECK VENDOR VENDOR DATE NUMBER NAME 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11109/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11209/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 001329 KOHLHOAS, JEANETTE 000209 L & M FERTILIZER, INC. 001607 L D D S COMMUNICATIONS, 001534 LA MASTERS OF FINE TRAV 001973 LA SALLE LIGHTING SERVI 00038~ LAW/CRANDALL~ INC. 001967 MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERV 001290 MEYER, JOHN 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS 001868 MIYAMOTO, SUSAN 001892 MOBILE MODULAR 001892 MOBILE MODULAR 001892 MOBILE MODULAR 001892 MOBILE MODULAR 000587 MUNOZ, MARION. 002118 NAASEH-SHAHRY, SAIED 002118 NAASEH-SHAHRY, SAIED 002118. NAASEH-SHAHRY, SAIED 001676 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS, 000235 0 C B REPROGRAPHICS, IN 002100 OBJECT RADIANCE 000239 000239 000239 0002.:39 000239 000239 OLSTEN STAFFING SERVICE OLSTEN STAFFING SERVICE OLSTEN STAFFING SERVICE OLSTEN STAFFING SERVICE OLSTEN STAFFING SERVICE OLSTEN STAFFING SERVICE 001561 001561 001561 001561 PAGENET - PAGING NETWOR PAGENET -PAG]NG NETWOR PAGENET - PAGING NETWOR PAGENET; PAGING NETt40R CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS [TEM DESCRIPTION TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS MISC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES LONG DISTANCE CHARGES ELECTION LAg SEMINAR:GREEK BALLFIELD LIGHT REPAIRS PROF SERVS-WINCHESTER RD TENP HELP W/E 10/29 LIPOSCHAK COMF:CA MAIN ST 9/13-15 MEYER BUSINESS CARDS FOR EMPLOYEES BUSINESS CARDS FOR EMPLOYEES TAX TAX TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS LEASE PAYMENT FOR INTERIM FIRE TAX LEASE PAYMENT FOR INTERIM FIRE TAX OLD TO~N TRASH MAINTENANCE CORF:LEAGUE CAL CITIES/NAASEH CONF:LEAGUE CAL C[TIES/NAASEH CONF:LEAGUE CAL C[TIES/NAASEH DISPATCH RADIOS MOBILE SERVS BLUEPRINTS REPROGRAPH[CS SERVS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TENP HELP W/E 10/08 GRAGE TEMP HELP 14/E 10/08 GRAGE TEMP HELP W/E 10/08 GRAGE TENP HELP W/E 10/15 GRAGE TEMP HELP W/E 10/15 GRAGE TENP HELP W/E 10/15 GRAGE PAGING SERVICES/OCT PAGING SERVICES/OCT PAGING SERVICES/OCT PAGING SERVICES/OCT ACCOUNT NUMBER 190-183-999-5330 100-164-601-5218 320-199-999-5208 001-120-999-5261 190-180-999-5212 210-165-6~1-5804 100-164-601-5118 001-161-501-5261 001-161-501-5222 001-161-502-5222 001-161-501-5222 001-161-502-5222 190-183-999-5330 001-171-999-5470 001-171-999-5470 001-171-999-5470 001-171-999-5470 001-163-999-5250 001-161-501-5258 001-161-502-5258 001-1170 320-199-999-5209 Z10-190-626-5802 190-183-999-5330 001-162-999-5118 001-161-501-5118 001-161-502-5118 001-'162-999-5118 001-161-501-5118 001-161-502-5118 320-199-999-5238 001-100-999-5250 001-162-999-5238 001-120-999-5250 ITEM AMOUNT 112.00 149.41 1,348.24 189.00 244.50 1,100.00 634.40 100.69 248.89 95.36 13.32 13.32 156.80 905.00 70.14 685. O0 53.09 376.00 105.61 105.60 3.00t 98~. 00 172.77 369.60 291.60 73.60 73.60 291.60 75.60 14.68 15.00 30.00 7.50 PAGE 3 CHECK AMOUNT 112.00 149.41 1,348.24 189.00 24~.50 1,100.00 634.40 100.69 370.89 156.80 1,713.23 376.00 208.21 984.00 172.77 369.60 885.60 VOUCHRE2 PAGE 4 112P9/95 14:44 VOUCHER/ CHECK NLINBER 26311 26311 26311 26311 26311 26312 26313 26314 26314 26314 26314 26314 26314 26314 26314 26314 26314 26314 "~15 5 26316 26317 26318 26319 26319 26319 26319 26319 26319 26319 26320 26321 26322 -2~323 26324 26324 CHECK DATE 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 .11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 VENDOR NUMBER 001561 001561 001561 001561 001561 001243 000733 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 001960 001960 000254 000270 000947 000262 000262 000262 000262 000262 000262 000262 000426 000418 000271 002112 000873 000873 VENDOR NAME PAGENET - PAGING NETWOR PAGENET - PAGING NETWOR PAGENET - PAGING NETt~3R PAGENET - PAGING NETWOR PAGENET - PAGING NETWOR PALMQUIST, MARY PARTY PZAZZ PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH POWAY HONDA KAWASAKI POWAY HONDA KAWASAKI PRESS-ENTERPRISE CONPAN R J M DESIGN GROUP, INC RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER RANCHO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL RIVERSIDE CO. CLERK & R ROBERT BEIN, kIN FROST & ROBERT J LUNG & ASSOCIA ROBERTS, RORALD H. ROBERTS, RORALD H. CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS ]TEN DESCRIPTION PAGING SERVICES/OCT PAGING SERVICES/OCT PAGING SERVICES/OCT PAGING SERVICES/OCT PAGING SERVICES/OCT TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS RENTAL ORDER FOR TABLES/CHAIRS PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT MOTORCYCLE MAINTENANCE MOTORCYCLE MAINTENANCE RECRUITMENT ADVERTISING OCT PROF SERVS-PRK~HEW/PAUBA R BLUE PRINTS FOR NEW CITY HALL 01-02-45005-2 SPT PRK WTR SERV WATER SERV WATER SERV WATER SERV WATER SERV WATER SERV WATER SERV INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES-CITY HALL WEED ABATEMENT LIENS RELEASES PROF SRVCS: WALCOTT CORRIDOR PHOTO OF 1ST STREET LEAGUE OF CITIES CONF:10/20-24 LEAGUE OF CITIES CONF:10/20-24 ACCOUNT NUMBER 190-180-999-5250 001'163'999'5Z50 100-16~-601-5238 001-165-999'5238 001-170-999'5242 190-183-999-5330 190-180-999-5301 001-140-999-5258 190-180-999-5260 100-164-601-5218 190-183-999-5320 190-18S-999-5320 001-150-999-5250 001-171-999-5296 001-150-999-5260 001-110-999-5260 100-164-604-5220 001-110-999-5260 001-170-999-5214 001-170-999-5214 001-150-999-5254 210-190-626-5802 210-199-650-5804 190-180-999-5240 190-180-999-5240 190-181-999-5240 190-182-999-5240 191-180-999-5240 193-180-999-5240 340-199-999-5240 340-199-999-5212 001-162-999-5440 210-165-637-5802 280-199-807-5802 001-100-999-5258 001-1170 ITEM AMOUNT 75.00 15.00 15.00 7.50 30.00 38~.80 142.23 37.20 7.85 2.47 36.14 29,08 10.00 40.77 32.00 25.00 26.93 28.95 251.64 282.80 299.94 350.00 109.91 6.85 3,029.15 138.60 1,344.16 211.56 2,224.53 9.28 46.55 30.00 724.0O 199.95 136.28 3.00- CHECK AMOUNT 209.68 384.80 142.23 276.39 534.44 299.94 350.00 109.91 6,964.13 46.55 30.00 724.00 199.95 133.28 .)-EG25 11/09/95 001942 s C SIGNS POSTING FOR SIGNS/CURRENT PLAN 001-161-501-5256 465.00 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TENECULA 11/09195 14:44 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ZTEH ACCOUNT NUNHER DATE NUNBER NANE DESCRIPTION NUNHER ITEN ANOUNT CHECK AHOUNT 26325 11/09/95 001942 S C SIGNS POSTING OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTI 001-120-999-5244 26325 11/09/95 001942 S C SIGNS NOTICE TNS LIGHTING-POSTING 001-120-999-5244 26325 11/09/95 001942 S C SIGNS NOTICE LiEN FOR NUISANCE ABATE 001-120-999-5244 26325 11/09/95 001942 S C SIGNS TZBG NOTICE-POSTING 001-120-999-5244 130.00 65.00 65.00 260.00 985.00 26326 11/09/95 000704 S K S, INC/INLAND OIL FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 001-163-999-5262 26326 11/09/95 000704 S K S, ]NC/INLAND OIL FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 001-165-999-5262 26326 11/09/95 000704 S K S, ]NC/INLAND OIL FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 001-110-999-5262 26326 11/09/95 000704 S K S, INC/INLAND OIL FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 190-180-999-526~ 26326 11/09/95 000704 S K S, INC/INLAND OIL FUEL FOR CiTY VEHICLES 001-162-999-5263 26326 11/09/95 000704 S K S, INC/INLAND OIL FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 001-170-999-5262 26326 11/09/95 000704 S K S, INC/INLAND OIL FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 100-164-601-5263 134.38 45.53 34.85 175.46 106.04 83.20 413,02 992.48 26327 11/09/95 000403 SHAWN SCOTT POOL & SPA POOL NAINT 9 ELENENTARY SCHOOL 190-180-999-5212 145.40 145.40 26328 11/09/95 000926 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON RELOCATE GUY WIRES ON YNEZ 001-1280 3,260.37 3,260.37 26329 !1/09/95 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON - ELECT SERVS 191-180-999-5319 26329 11/09/95 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EOISON- 2-02-351~5836 VIA OEL CORONADO 193-180-999-5240 26329 11/09/95 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON - 2-02-351-6073 VIA'RIO TMCULA 193-180-999-5240 26329 11/09/95 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON - 2-02-351-6420 VIA COROOBA IRRG 190-180-999-5240 1,262.14 15.95 15.95 140.38 1,434.42 26330 11/09/95 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 909-205-4070/MJM/OCT 001-110-999-5208 26330 11/09/95 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 909 312-0474 EOC 320-199-999-5208 26330 11/09/95 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 909 205-4070 MJM-OVRCHG 001-110-999-5208 184.39 15.74 25.97- 26331 11/09/95 000294 STATE FUND - SAN FRANCI WORKERS# CONP-OCT/95 001-2370 4,322.32 26331 11/09/95 000294 STATE FUND - SAN FRANC] WORKERS' CONP-OCT/95 100-2370 1,484.83 26331 11/09/95 000294 STATE FUNO- SAN FIL~NCI WORKERS~ CONP-OCT/95 165-2370 37.08 26331 1'1/09/95 000294 STATE FUND - SAN FRANCI ~K)RKERS' CONP-OCT/95 190-2370 1,965.20 26331 11/09/95 000294 STATE FUND - SAN FRANCI WORKERS' CONP-OCT/95 191-2370. 26331 11/09/95 000294 STATE FUND - SAN FRANCI WORKERS~ CONP-OCT/95 192-2370 12.15 26331 11/09/95 000294 STATE FUND - SAN FRANC] WORKERS# CONP-OCT/95 193-2370 204.68 26331 11/09/95 000294 STATE FUND - SAN FRANCI gORKERS~ CONP-OCT/g5 194-2370 33.85 26331 11/09/95 000294 STATE FUND - SAN FRANCI WORKERS# CONP-OCT/95' 280-2370 108.30 26331 11/09/95 000294 STATE FUNO- SAN FRANCI WORKERS~ CONP-OCT/95 300-2370 11.95 26331 11/09/95 000294 STATE FUND - SAN FRANCI t4ORKERS~ CONP-OCT/95 320-2370 32.12 26331 11/09/95 000294 STATE FUND - SAN FRANCI WORKERS' COIqP-OCT/95 330-2370 13.64 26331 11/09/95 000294 STATE FUNO- SAN FRANCI WORKERS~ CONP-OCT/95 340-2370 309.26 26331 11/09/95 000294 STATE FUND - SAN FRANCI t~3RKERS~ CONP-OCT/95 001-1182 8,703.67 26332 11/09/95 001546 STRAIGHT LINE GLASS CRC WINDO~ REPAIR 190-182-999-5212 127.50 127.50 26333.11/09/95 000305 TARGET STORE MISC SUPPLIES FOR RECREATION 190-180-999-5301 ~-26334 11/09/95 000306 TEMECULA VALLEY PIPE & TCSD IqA[NT. AND REPAIR OF PARK 190-180-999-5212 50.85 610.32 50.85 610.32 26335 11/09/95 000316 THORNHILL, C~RY :CCAPA CONF:9/29-10/3 001-161-501-5258 26335 11/09/95 000316 THORNHILL, GARY .:CCAPA CONF:9/29-10/3 001-161-502-5258 · 26336 11/09/95 002111 TOGO'S NEGOTIATIOR TRAI~ING LUNCH 001-110-999-5261 14.01 14.00 71.50 28.01 71--rd3 VOUCHRE2 11 / 09/95 VOucHER/ CHECK NUMBER 26337 26337 26337 26337 26338 26339 26340 26341 26341 26342 26342 14:44 CHECK DATE 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 11/09/95 VENDOR NUMBER 000320 .000320 000320 000320 002117 001944 002016 000326 000326 000345 000345 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS VENDOR ITEM NAME DESCRIPTION TOgNE CENTER STATIONERS OFFICE SUPPLIES TOgNE CENTER STATIONERS OFFICE SUPPLIES TONNE CENTER STATIONERS OFFICE SUPPLIES TiE CENTER STATIONERS, OFFICE SUPPLIES TRADE &CONMERCE AGENCY TRADE SHOW PARTICIPATION FEE TRANSTECH ENGINEERS, IN PROS SVCS SIGNAL DESIGN TSUTSUNIDA & ASSOCIATES NEW CITY HALL SPACE PLANNING UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE, UNIFORM NAINT/PUBLIC WORKS UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE, UNIFORM NAINT, FOR TCSD XEROX CORPORATION BILLI METER USAGE FRON 9/26-10/26 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI LEASE FOR COPIER ~ CRC ACCOUNT NUMBER 100-164-604-5220 100-16/,-604-5220 100-164-604-5220 100-164-604-5220 280-199-999-5264 210-165-659-5804 210-199-650-5804 100-164-601-5243 190-180-999-5243 330-199-999-5239 190-182-999-5239 ITEM AMOUNT 56.57 13.T3- 4.49 56.34 860.00 870.00 525.00 24.00 50.02 1,306.41 117.84 PAGE 6 CHECK AMOUNT 103.67 860.00 870.00 525.00 74.02 1,424.25 TOTAL CHECKS 55,637.86 VOUCHRE2 11/16195 14:55 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 100 GAS TAX FUND 165 RDA DEV- LOI,//MO0 SET ASIDE 190 CONMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND 280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP 300 INSURANCE FUND 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS SUPPORT SERVICES FACILITIES TOTAL AMOUNT 49,414.06 8,839.31 917.7'3 15,182.58 7,541.55 22,198.51 2,774.12 -187.69 37,633.64 872.52 823.42 2,572.33 701.10 851.23 150,309,79 VOUCHRE2 11/16/95 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 26343 26344 26345 576714 576714 576714 576714 576714 576714 576714 576714 576714 576714 576714 576714 576714 576714 576714 576714 576714 576714 576714 576714 576714 576714 576714 576714 576714 576714 580657 580657 580657 580657 580657 580657 580657 580657 580657 580657 580657 580657 580657 580657 580657 580657 580657 580657 14:55 CHECK DATE 11/14/95 11/15/95 11/15/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11116195 11/16/95 11/16/95 VENDOR NUMBER 000314 001432 002120 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 00028;3 000283 000283 00028~ 000283 000283 00028~ 000283 00028~ 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 000444 00044~+ 000444 000444 000444 000444 000~ 00044~ VENDOR NAME TEMECULA VALLEY MUSEUM PUBLIC SERVICE SKILLS, PALACE STATION FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FXRSTAX (ZRS) FXRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (ZRS) FIRSTAX (ZRS) FIRSTAX (ZRS) FIRSTAX (ZRS) FXRSTAX (XRS). FIRSTAX (ZRS) FIRSTAX (ZRS) FIRSTAX (XRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (EDD) FIRSTAX (EDD) FIRSTAX (EDD) FIRSTAX (EDD) FIRSTAX (EDD) FIRSTAX (EDD) FIRSTAX (EDD) FIRSTAX (EDD) FIRSTAX (EDD) FIRSTAX (EDD) FIRSTAX (EOD) FIRSTAX (EDD) FIRSTAX (EDD) FIRSTAX (EDD) FIRSTAX (EDD) FIRSTAX (EDD) FIRSTAX (EDD) FIRSTAX (EDD) CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION DRAW #6 FOR MUSEUM CONF:HONOCZDE INVEST/ANTORIADZ HOTEL:HUMOCIDE INVEST/ANTONIAD 000283 FEDERAL 00028~ FEDERAL 00028,:3 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEOERAL 000283 FEOERAL 000283 MEOICARE 000283 MEOICARE 000283 NEOXCARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE - 000283 MEOZCARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 MEDXCARE 000283 MEDZCARE 000283 MEDZCARE 000283 MEDZCARE 000283 MEDXCARE 000444 SDI 000444 SOl 000444 SDI 000444 SOl 000444 SOl 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 0004~4 STATE O004J,~ STATE 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 000444 STATE O004~J,- STATE 00(34~' STATE ACCOUNT NUMBER 210-190-808-5804 001-170-999-5261 001-170-999-5261 001-2070 100-2070 165-2070 190-2070 191-2070 192-2070 193-2070 194-2070 280-2070 300-2070 320-2070 330-2070 340-2070 001-2070 100-2070 165-2070 190-2070 191-2070 192-2070 193-2070 194-2070 280-2070 300-2070 320-2070 330-2070 340-2070 001-2070 100-2070 190-2070 193-2070 280-2070 001-2070 100-2070 165-2070 190-2070 191-2070 192-2070 193-2070 194-2070 280-2070 300-2070 320-2070 330-2070 340-2070 ITEM AMOUNT 3,921.64 495. O0 263.99 11,883.82 2,740.97 30.31 2,792.36 93.64 75.57 418.42 76.17 202.00 129.76 371.27 115.94 238.17 2,765.51 571.56 14.62 733.12 21.68 24.64 87.44 14.57 65.84 22.43 6O.72 25.32 89.75 55.09 10.12 43.78 6.65 8.67 3,207.89 673.54 9.28 666.66 18.13 9.57 100.51 16.55 35.01 38.79 93.45 22.96 36.45 PAGE 1 CHECK AMOUNT 3,921.64 495.00 263.99 23,665.58 5,053 VOUCHRE2 PAGE 2 11~!6/95 14:55 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 26348 26349 26350 26350 26350 26351 26351 26351 26352 26352 26353 26354 26354 26355 26355 ~-z-X55 J6 26357 26358 26359 26360 26360 26360 26360 26361 26362 26362 26363 26364 26365 26365 26365 26365 ~,~.365 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUdHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PER]iS CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER 11/16/95 11/16/95' 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/~ 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 001425 001414 001414 001414 001006 001006 001006 000128 000128 000127 000136 000136 000137 000137 000137 000447 002106 001233 001393 001393 001393 001393 000155 0005Z3 000523 001056 001002 001002 001002 001002 001002 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR COOP. ARENSKOV, MARIE BRADLEY, RONALD E. BRADLEY', RONALD E. BRADLEY, RONALD E. BURTRONXCS BUSINESS SYS BURTRONICS BUSINESS SYS BURTRONICS BUSINESS SYS LA 6015202110195 TH 320-199-999-5208 REFUND:ACTIViTY CANCELLATION 190-183-498d REIMB:LEAGUE OF CITIE:10/21-24 001-110-~9~-5258 REIMB:LEAGUE OF ClTIE:10/21-24 001-1170 REIMB:URBAN LAND CONF:10/25-27 001-110-~9-5258 FUJI MICROFILM 16MN 330-199-999-5220 FREIGHT 330-1~-~-5220 TAX 330-199-~<~-5220 CAL'SURANCE ASSOCIATES, EQUIP FLOATER INSURANCE CAL"SURANCE ASSOCIATES, EQUIP FLOATER INSURANCE CALXFOONIAN, iNC. 'LEGA PUBLIC NOTICES CHESHERS' CUSTOM EMBROI CODE ENFORCE JACKET W/SEAL CHESHERS' CUSTOM EMBROI TAX FUEL EXPENSE FOR CITY VEHICLES FUEL EXPENSE FOR CITY VEHICLES FUEL EXPENSE FOR CITY VEHICLES CHEVRON U S A iNC. CHEVRON U S A INC. CHEVRON U S A INC. SUPPLIES FOR RADIOS CONTRONIX OF HEMET REFUND-TCSD CLASS REGISTRATION CUSEY, LINDA DA FAMILY SUPPORT 002106 SUPPORT DAN'S FEED & SEED, INC. PROPANE GAS SUPPLY-FIELD TANKS PARKING CITATIONS/AUG 95 PARKING CITATIONS/AUG 95 PARKING CITATIONS/SEPT 95 PARKING CITATIONS/SEPT 95 DATA TICKET, INC. DATA TICKET, INC. DATA TICKET, iNC. DATA TICKET, iNC. RECORDINGS OF PC MEETINGS DAVLIN EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER WATER SERV-DIEGO DR LDSC EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER REFUND:PERMIT FEE EXCEL LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION REPAIR WORK FERGUSON, RENEE FIRST INTERSTATE BANK C FIRST INTERSTATE BANK C FIRST INTERSTATE BANK C FIRST INTERSTATE BANK C FIRST iNTERSTATE BANK C REFUND:ACTIVITY CANCELLATION 5473-6664-0391-0099/JS 5473-6664-0391-0180/KL 547~-6664-0391-0040/PB 5473-6664-0391-0073 5473-6664-0391-0222/RR 300-1~-~-5200 300-1~-~-5200 001-161-501-5256 001-162-~-5243 001-162-9~-5243 190-180-~-5263 001-161-501-5262 001-162-~-5263 190-180-999-5242 190-183-4982 190-2140 100-164-601-5218 001-140-~-5250 001-170-~-5250 001-140-~-5250 001-170-~-5250 001-161-501-5250 193-180-~-5240 001-26&0 193-180-999-5415 190-183-4982 001-100-999-5258 001-100-999-5258 001-100-999-5258 001-100-999-5258 001-100-~-5258 Z TEN AMOUNT 70.88 40. O0 176.92 70.20 - 6.00 372.00 5.95 28.83 495. O0 25.15 25,56 60. O0 4,65 83.92 9.39 11.93 39.87 40.00 82.50 10.13 105.00 105.00 106.25 106.25 150.00 297.42 3.00 44.13 25.00 922.16 1,015.70 847.24 766.40 1,076.41 CHECK AMOUNT 70.88 40.00 112.72 406.78 520.15 25.56 64.65 105.24 39.87 40,00 82.50 10.13 422.50 150.00 300.42 44.13 25.00 VOUCHRE2 11/16/95 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 26365 26365 26365 26365 26365 26365 26365 26366 26366 26367 26367 26367 26368 26369 26370 26370 26~70 26~70 26371 14:55 CHECK VENDOR VENDOR DATE NUMBER NAME 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95' 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 001002 FIRST INTERSTATE BANK C 001002 FIRST INTERSTATE BANK C 001002 FIRST INTERSTATE BANK C 001002 FIRST INTERSTATE BANK C 001002' FIRST INTERSTATE BANK C 001002 FIRST INTERSTATE BANK C 001002 FIRST INTERSTATE BANK C 00018/, G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 00018/, G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 000177 000177 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PROOUCT GLENNIES OFFICE PROOUCT GLENNIES OFFICE PROOUCT 001013 HINDERLITER de LLAMAS A 0013~3 HOWE HELDING & FABRICAT 000194 000194 000194 000194 RETIREMENT TRUS RETIREMENT TRUS RETIREMENT TRUS RETIREMENT TRUS 001390 IHAGE WATCHES, INC. CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS ITEM DESCRIPTION 5/.7~-666~-0391-0172/RB 5/*73-666~-0391-017'Z/RB 5/.73-666~-0391-0115/JG 5/.73-666/*-0391-0206/GR 5/*73 666~ 0391 0123 GT 5/*T3 666~ 0391 012.:3 GT 5/.73-666~-0391-0131/AE 909 69/*-1211 POLICE DEPT 909 694-6/*00 GEN USAGE OFFICE SUPPLIES MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES SALES TAX ANALYSIS FY 95-96 RAISE OVERHEAD VEHICLE LIGHTS 000194 DEF CONP 000194 DEF COMP 000194 DEF COMP 00019/* DEF COMP CITY EMPLOYEE WATCHES 26372 11/16/95 000199 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVIC 000199 IRS GARN 26372 11/16/95 OOO199 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVIC 000199 IRS GARN 26373 26374 26374 26374 26374 26374 26373 26376 26377 26378 11/16/95 000860 JOCHUM, LORI 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE 001534 LA MASTERS OF FINE TRAV 000869 LAWRENCE WELK RESORT TH LEMIEUX, ELLEN 000214 LUNCH & STUFF CATERING 001967 MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERV NINARDI, MARIO 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 26379 26380 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TEMP HELP W/E 10/29 LUJAN TEMP HELP WE 11/5 EVANS TEMP HELP W/E 11/5 EVANS TEMP HELP W/E 11/5 EVANS TEMP HELP W/E 11/05 LUJAN AIRFARE:ECON DEV CONF:MCLARNEY EXCURSION TO WELK THEATRE 12/7 REFUND-TCSD CLASS REGISTRATION CITY COUNCIL MTG CATERING SERV TEMP HELP W/E 11/5-I. IPOSCHAK REFUND:ACTIVITY CANCELLATION ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-110-999-5258 001-1170 001-120-999-5258 001-140-999-5260 001-161-502-5258 001-161-501-5258 001-1170 320-199-999-5208 320-199-999-5208 001-1/.0-999-5220 330-199-999-5220 001-1/*0-999-5220 001-1/*0-999-52/.8 100-164-601-5215 001-2080 100-2080 190-2080 192-2080 001-1170 001-21/*0 100-21/,0 190-183-999-5330 190-180-999-5118 001-165-999-5118 001-165-999-5118 100-164-60/*-5118 190-180-999-5118 001-110-999-5258 190-183-999-5330 190-1834982 001-100-999-5260 100-164-601-5118 190-183-4986 ITEM AMOUNT 1,666.64 67.20 565.24 32.53 76.49 76.50 84.00 259.18 966.16 70.31 19.44 132.87 912.05 200.00 937.90 86.44 452.78 100.00 388. O0 1/.3.36 143.34 8/*.00 4/*2.00 103.13 103.13 103.14 442.00 5.00 420.00 20.00 80.00 60.00 PAGE 3 CHECK AMOUNT 7,196.51 1,205.34 222.62 912.05 200.00 1,577-"' 38~.. 286.70 8~.00 1,193.40 5.00 420.00 20.00 80.00 483,73 60. O0 26381 11/16/95 00138~ MINUTEMAN PRESS BUSINESS CARDS-B.HANPTON 001-162-999-5222 38.25 26381 11/16/95 O013St, MINUTEMAN PRESS TAX 001-162-999-5222 2.96 VOUCHRE2 C/TY OF TEMECULA 11L16/95 16:55 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 26382 11/16/95 000228 MOBIL, INC. FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 001-161-502-5262 26382 11/16/95. 000228 MOBIL, INC. FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 100-164-601-5263 26383 11/16/95 001200 N P E L R A MEMBERSHIP RENEgAL/G YATES 96 001-150-999-5226 13.80 18.36 160.00 32.16 160.00 26384 11/16/95 001277 NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITI NATtL LEAGUE CONF:UBNOSKE 001-161-502-5258 500.00 500.00 26385 11/16/95 001383 P M W ASSOCIATES, INC. LIFO & FIRO SURVEY SERVS 001-162-999-5261 26386 11/16/95 PATULA, PAULA REFUND-TCSD CLASS REGISTRATION 190-18~-4982 ~45.00 65.00 345.00 65.00 26387 11/16/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEESt RETIRE 000246 PER REDE 001-2130 26387 11/16/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEESt RETIRE 000246 PER REDE 100-2130 26387 11/16/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEESt RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 001-2~90 26387 11/16/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEESt RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 100-2390 26387 11/16/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEESt RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 165-2390 26387 11/16/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 190-2390 26387 11/16/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEESt RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 191-2390 26387 11/16/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 192-2~90 26387 11/~6/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 193-2390 26387 11/16/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS REt 194-2390 '26387 11/16/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEESt RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 280-2390 '="~87 11/16/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 300-2390 7 11/16/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 320-?..390 .a7 11/16/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEESt RETIRE 0002/,6 PERS RET 330'2390 ~6387 11/16/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 340-2390 26387 11/16/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES# RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 001-2390 26387 11/16/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 100-2390 26387 11/16/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 165-2390 26387 11/16/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 190-2390 26387 1'1/16/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 191-2390 26387 11/16/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEESt RETIRE 0002~6 SURVIVOR 192-2390 26387 11/16/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 193-2390 26387 11/16/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 0002~6 SURVIVOR 194-2390 26387 11/16/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEESt RETIRE 0002~6 SURVIVOR 280-2390 26387 11/16/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 300-2390 26387 11/16/95 000246 PERS (ENPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 320-2390 26387 11/16/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 330-2390 26387 11/16/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 340-2390 191.61 65.19 13,264.10 2,636.99 82.54 2,996.80 95.64 105.27 326.05 75.17 226.21 106.83 282.54 109.73 397.29 58.20 10.64 12.56 .47 .93 1,39 ,23 .78 .46 .93 ,93 2.09 21,051.80 26388 11/16/95 001958 PERS LONG TERM CARE PRO 001958 PERS L-T 100-2122 51.70 51.70 26389 11/16/95 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-180-999-5260 26389 11/16/95 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-183-999-5320 26389 11/16/95 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-183-999-5370 26389 11/16/95 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-110-999-5258 26389 11/16/95 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-162-999-5220 26389 11/16/95 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-140-999-5220 26389 11/16/95 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-110-999-5260 30.00 43.60 16.12 24.00 5.06 8.40 15.00 142.18 26390 11/16/95 000580 PHOTO~IORKS MlSC SUPPLIES/SERVICES 001-171-999-5250 44.55 ~4.55 VOUCHRE2 11/16/95 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 26391 26392 26392 26393 26394 26394 26394 26394 26395 26396 26397 26398 26398 26399 26400 26400 26400 26401 26402 26403 26404 26404 26405 26405 26406 26406 26406 26406 26406 26407 26407 26407 26407 26407 ' 26407 14:55 CHECK DATE 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 il/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 VENDOR NUMBER 000254 002110 002110 000546 000262 000262 000262 000262 000426 00207'5 001046 000266 000266 000~18 000678 000678 000678 000357 001675 002007 002041 002041 000519 000519 000537 000537 000537 000537 000537 0003?5 000375 0003?5 000375 000375 000375 VENDOR NAME PRESS-ENTERPRI SE CONPAN PRIME EQUIPMENT PRIME EQUIPMENT RADIO SHACK RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER RANCHO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL RESOURCE GROUP, THE REXON, FREEDMAN, KLEPET RIGHTHAY RIGHTWAY RIVERSIDE CO. CLERk & R RIVERSIDE CO. HEALTH SE RIVERSIDE CO. HEALTH SE RIVERSIDE CO. HEALTH SE RIVERSIDE CO. TRANSPORT RIVERSIDE CO./GSA BUILD SATELLITE COMPUTER SYST SEAN' MALEK ENGINEERING SEAN MALEK ENGINEERING SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERZOOS ITEM DESCRIPTION ADS FOR CAPITAL PROJECTS EQUIPMENT RENTALS - PARKS EQUIPMENT RENTALS - PARKS MISC COMPUTER SUPPLIES 01-06-84300-1/FRONT ST WATER SERVS 09/27-10/25 ~ATER SERVS 09/27-10/25 WATER SERVS 09/27-10/25 INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES-PARKS CENSUS IN OLD TOgN TEMECULA OCT 95 PROF LEGAL SERVICES PORTABLE T~ILETS FOR CITY EXPO PORTABLE TOLlLET FOR CITY YARD APERTURE CARD DUPLICATES HEALTH PERMIT-42775 MARGA HEALTH PERMIT-30875 RANCHO VIS HEALTH PERMIT-DE PORTOLA CO OF R'SIDE NAP MANUAL & STND RIGHT OF WAY SERVICES/OCT 95 TEM MIDDLE SCHOOL LIGHT PRJT SIDEWALK IMPROVE-RANCHO VISTA SIDEWALK IMPROVE-RANCHO VISTA PEST CONTROL SRVCS-SENIOR CNTR PEST CNTRL SERVS/KENT HINDERGA VARIOUS ELECT SERVS LOCATIONS VARIOUS ELECT SERVS LOCATIONS VARIOUS ELECT SERVS LOCATIONS VARIOUS ELECT SERVS LOCATIONS 2-01-202-7530 909 202-4769 JS 909 202-4204 KL 909 202-4763 PB 909 202-4762 RP 909 202-4758 RR 909 205-4070 MJM ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-165-999-5256 190-180-999-5238 190-180-999-5238 320-199-999-5221 100-164-601-5240 190-180-999-5240 191-180-999-5240 193-180-999-5240 190-180-999-5212 165-199-999-5250 001-130-999-5247 190-180-999-5238 100-164-601-5238 001-163-999-5220 190-180-999-5250 190-182-999-5250 190-180-999-5250 001-163-999-5228 280-199-602-5700 210-190-141-5804 210-165-656-580~ 210-165-656-5804 190-181-999-5250 190-180-999-5250 190-180-999-5240 191-180-999-5240 191-180-999-5319 193-180-999-5240 192-180-999-5319 001-100-999-5208 001-100-999-5208 001-100-999-5208 001-100-999-5208 001-100-999-5208 001-110-999-5208 ITEM AMOUNT 126.00 94.20 21.81 32.29 15.38 379.63 75.32 J,375.87 14.22 780.00 703.75 100.78 57.39 5.00 65.00 65.00 65.00 43.88 99.86 600.00 2,522.00 30,590.00 29.00 32.00 1,376.02 16.74 7,019.93 72.34 21,882.53 59.02 41.17 36.02 146.49 52.92 155.15 PAGE 5 CHECK AMOUNT 126.00 116.01 32.29 1,846.20 14.22 780.00 703.75 - 158.17 5.00 195.00 43.88 99.86 600. O0 33,112.00 61.00 30,367.56 VOUCHRE2 11/16/95 VOucHER/ CHECK NUMBER 26407 26407 26407 26407 26407 26407 26407 26407 26407 26407 26407 26407 26407 26407 26407 26407 26407 26408 26408 26409 26411 26~12 26413 26414 26415 14:55 CHECK DATE 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11~16/95 VENDOR NUMBER 0003?5 000375 000375 0003?5 000375 0003?5 0003?5 000375 000375 000375 00037'5 000375 000375 000375 000291 000291 000465 001497 000905 001022 000320 000459 VENDOR NAME SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON. SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON SOUTHERN CAL]F TELEPHON SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON SOUTHERN CAL]F TELEPHON SPEE DEE OIL CHANGE & T SPEE DEE OIL CHANGE & T STRADLEY, MARY KATHLEEN SWAIN, LARRY T R W, INC.-INFORMATION TEMECULA SHUTTLE SERVIC THOMPSON PUBLISHING GRO TOt~NE CENTER STATIONERS TUMBLE JUNGLE CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION 909 202-4770 RB 909 202-4757 JG 909 202-5153 GY 909 202-4767 GT 909 202-4767 GT 909 202-4759 TE 909 203-9994 BB 909 202-4764 PW BLAZER 909 202-4765 PW MAINT CREW 909 202-4760 JH 909 205-8688 PW EOC 909 206-0992 BH 909 202-9876 HP 909 202-4754 KH 909 202-4755 CITY VAN 909 205-7877E0C 909 202-4756 KRTM(EOC) REPAIR/MAXNT. VEHICLE; B&S REPAIR/MAXNT. VEHICLE; B&S PAYMENT TO INSTRUCTOR REFUND-TSCD CLASS REGISTRATION TRW CREDIT SERVS FOR RDA LOANS SHUTTLE SERVICE/AIRPORT KL SUB:FAIR LABOR STANDARDS 95-96 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES/PWADMIN TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 26416 11/16/95 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF, C 001065 DEF COMP 26416 11/16/95 001065 U S C N/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 26416 11/16/95 001065 U S C N/PEBSCO (OEF. C 001065 DEF COMP 26416 11/16/95 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 OEF COMP 26416 11/16/95 001065 U S C N/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 OEF COMP 26416 11/16/95 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 OEF COMP 26416 11/16/95 001065 U S C N/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF CONP 26416 11/16/95 001065 U S C N/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 OEF COMP 000389 000389 000389 000389 000389 26417 ~_6417 26417 26417 26417 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 U S C N/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETZR U S C N/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR- U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR U S C N/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-110-999-5208 001-120-999-5208 001-150-999-5208 001-161-501-5208 001-161-502-5208 001-162-999-5208 100-164-601-5208 100-164-601-5208 100-164-601-5208 100-164-603-5208 100-164-604-5208 190-180-999-5208 190-180-999-5208 190-180-999-5208 190-180-999-5208 320-199-999-5208 320-199-999-5208 001-162-999-5214 001-162-999-5214 190-183-999-5330 190-18~-4982 280-199-999-5250 001-100-999-5258 001-150-999-5228 100-164-604-5220 190-183-999-5330 001-2080 100-2080 190-2080 194-2080 280-2080 300-2080 320-2080 340-2080 001-2160 100-2160 190-2160 193-2160 280-2160 ITEM AMOUNT 49.04 44.22 96.88 39.53 39.52 46.22 86.33 72.97 48.15 113.70 84.15 59.47 68.88 60.33 44.22 100.49 41.92 20.99 20.99 456.00 20.00 50.00 238.00 59.78 925.60 2,288.09 211.62 367.85 5.00 57.19 5.00 312.50 87.50 413.08 328.34 43.90 65.02 PAGE 6 CHECK AMOUNT 1,586.79 41.98 456.00 20.00 50.00 238.00 59.78 925.60 3,33~.75 926.24 26418 11/16/95 000325 UNITED WAY OF THE INLAN 000325 UW 001-2120 55.51 VOUCHRE2 11/16/95 VOUCHER/ CHECK HUMBER 26418 26418 26418 26418 26419 26420 26420 26421 26421 26422 26423 26423 26424 26425 26425 14:55 CHECK DATE 11/16/~5 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/~5 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/~5 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 11/16/95 CITY OF TENECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS VENDOR VENDOR ITEM NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTXON 000325 UNITED MAY OF THE INLAN 000325 UW 000325 UNITED WAY OF THE INLAN 000325 UW 000325 UNITED WAY OF THE INLAN 000325 UW 000325 UNITED WAY OF THE ]NLAN 000325 UW VINEYARD COUNTRY RESTAU ROOM CHRG OTMA MTG 7/27/95 001342 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY, BUZLOZNG MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 001342 WAXXE SANITARY SUPPLY~ BUXLDING MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 001893 WESTERN INDUSTRIAL NGNT TENP HELP W/E 9/13 BERG 001893 WESTERN iNDUSTRIAL MGNT TEMP HELP W/E 9/17 BERG WESTERN PUMP INC REFUND: CANCELLED FXRE PERMIT 002109 WHITE CAP SUPPLIES FOR SAFETY EXPO 002109 WHITE CAP TAX 001874 WILLIAMS, KAREN TCSD INSTRUCTORS EARNINGS WINDSONG HARMONY CHORUS RE-ISSUE/REFUND'SECURITY DEPOS WINDSONG HARMONY CHORUS RE-ISSUE/REFUND-SECURITY DEPOS TOTAL CHECKS ACCOUNT NUMBER 100-2120 165-2120 190-2120 280-2120 280-199-999-5260 190-182-999-5212 190-182-999-5212 001-162-999-5118 001-162-999-5118 001-171-4037 100-164-601-5218 100-164-601-5218 190-183-999-5330 190-2900 190-183-4990 ITEM AMOUNT 6.80 .75 17.00 1.94 60.00 127.31 216.85 145.60 113.75 144.00 186.81 14.48 252.00 100.00 264.00 PAGE 7 CHECK AMOUNT 82.00 60.00 344.16 259.35 144.00 201.29 252.00 364.00 150,30~ VO~JCHRE2 11/16/95 15:20 CITY OF TENECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 100 GAS TAX FUND 165 RDA DEVo L(N/HOD SET ASIDE 210 CAPITAL IHPROVEHENT PROJ FUND 280 REDEVELOPHENT AGENCY - CIP 320 %NFORHATION SYSTEHS 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 390 TCSD DEBT SERVICE TOTAL AMOUNT 619,012.70 5,255.00 3,~86.33 540,447,50 15,998.22 7,647.66 3,016.37 2,26~.97 1,197,128.75 VOUCHRE2 11116195 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 26~28 26429 26429 26~30 26431 26431 26432 26432 26432 26433 26434 26434 26435 26436 26436 26436 26437 26438 26438 26439 26439 26439 26439 26439 26439 26439 26439 26440 26441 26442 26442 26443 26443 26444 15:20 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION 11/28/95 11/28/95 11/28195 11/28/95 11/28/95 11/28/95 11/28/95 11/28/95 11/28/95 11/28/95 11/28/95 11/28/95 11/28/95 11/28/95 11/28/95 11/28/95 11/28/95 11/28/95 11/28/95 11/28/95 11/28/95 11/28/95 11/28/95 11/28/95 11/28/95 11/28/95 11/28/95 11/28/95 11/28/95 .11/28/95 11/28/95 11/28/95 11/28/95 001916 001281 001281 001168 001006 001006 001178 001178 001178 000979 001945 001945 0OO754 000351 000351 000351 002062 000820 000820 002042 002042 002042 002042 ~02042 002042 002042 002042 001207 001007 O013SS 001383 000270 000270 OOO947 11/28/95 ALBERT A. UEBB ASSOCIAT SEPT DESIGN SERV 6TH ST. PRKIN ALHAMBRA GROUP ALHAMBRA GROUP DESIGN SERVICES-NARGARITA PARK DESIGN SERV/DUCK POND BANK OF AMERICA ADMIN FEES TCSD SERIES 92 BURTRONICS BUSINESS SYS MAINT CONTRACT FOR RECORDER BURTRONICS BUSINESS SYS TAX C M S BUSINESS FORMS, I C M S BUSINESS FORMS, 1 C M S BUSINESS FORMS, I BUSINESS LICENSE HAILERS FREIGHT TAX DEL RIO ENTERPRISE DESILTING POND RESTORATION E. A. MENDOZA CONTIL~CTI RANCHO SPT PRK CONSTRUCTION E. A. MENDOZA CONTRACTI RETENTION W/H INV 284-04 ELLIOTT GROUP, THE LANDSCAPE REV]EUS ' GILLISS, MAX C.M.. GILLISS, MAX C.M. GiLLISS, MAX C.M. AUG PROF SERVS-CALTRANS PROF SERVS-CALTRANS MATTERS SEPT PROF SERVS-CALTRANS MATTE JOHN EGAN & ASSOCIATES, MESTERN BYPASS-PROF ENG SERVS K R W & ASSOCIATES K R W & ASSOCIATES PROF SERVS AGRMT/LAND DEVE/ENG WORKERS~ CUMP COVERAGE KUNZE, INC. KUNZE, INC. KUNZE, INC. KUNZE, INC. KUNZE, INC. KUNZE, INC. KUNZE, INC. KUNZE, INC. PARKVIEM SITE ROUGH GRADING PARKVIE~ SITE ROUGH GRADING PARKVIE~ SITE ROUGH GRADING RETENTION:PARKVIEU SITE PARKVIE~ SITE-PROJ PW93-09 RETENTION:PARKVIE~ P~/93-09 PARKV]E~ SITE ROUGH GRADING RETENT]ON:PARKVIE~ GRADING MARTIN J. JASKA, INC. RELEASE RETENTION PW93-O3CSD N P G CORP, ASPHALT PATCHING 140RK-RB~ CYN ASSOCIATES, INC, RDA CONSULTING SERVS-OCT 95 ASSOCIATES, INC. RDA CONSULTING SERVS-OCT 95 DESIGN GROUP, ]NC SEPT PROF SERVS-PRKVIEH SITE DESIGN GROUP, INC OCT PROF SERVS-FIRE STATION RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C BLUEPRINTS-~INCHESTER/I-15/MP ACCOUNT NUMBER 280-199-804-5802 210-190-119-5802 210-190-143-5802 390-199-999-5227 330-199-999-5217 330-199-999-5217 001-140-999-5222 001-140-999-5222 001-140-999-5222 100-164-601-5401 210-190-137-5804 210-2035 001-161-501-5250 001-110-999-5248 001-110-999-5248 001-110-999-5248 210-165-612-5802 001-163-999-5249 001-1182 210-199-128-5804 210-199-128-5804 210-199-128-5804 210-2035 210-199-128-5804 210-2035 210-199-128-5804' 210-2035 210-2035 100-164-601-5402 280-199-999-5248 165-199-999-5248 210-190-138-5802 210-190-626-5802 280-199-602-5802 ITEM AMOUNT 10,780.88 2,500.00 2,440.00 2,264.97 2,984.00 32.37 1,369.00 49.82 95.83 3,450.00 216,925.00 21,692.50- 1,505.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 6,358.18 3,487.50 113.Z5- 127,857.40 6,000.00 16,250.50 15,010.79' 12,000.00 1,200.00- 21,699.00 2,169.90' 148,911.70 1,805.00 3,484.34 3,486.33 8,175.00 3,565.80 1,?'51,00 PAGE 1 CHECK AMOUNT 10,780.88 4,940.00 2,264.97 3,016.37 1,514.65 3,450.00 195,2~2.50 ' 1,505.00 6,0C 6,358.18 3,374.25 165,426.21 148,911.70 1,805.00 6,972.67 11,740.80 1,731.00 VOUCHRE2 1 ~J 16/95 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 26445 26445 26445 26445 26445 26445 26446 26446 26446 26446 26446 26446 26446 26446 26446 26446 26446 26446 26446 26446 26446 '~6 _446 26446 26446 26446 26/+46 26447 26448 26448 26448 26449 26450 264 51 264 51 26452 26453 15:20 CHECK DATE 11/28/95 11/28/95 11/28/95 11/28/95 11/28/95 11/28/95 11/28/95 11/28/95 11/28/95 11/28/95 11/28/95 11/28/95 11/28/95 11/28/95 11/28/95 11/28/95 11/28/95 11/28/95 11/28/95 11/28/95 11/28/95 11/28/95 11/28/95 11/28/95 11/28/95 11/28/95 11/28/95 11/28/95 11/28/95 11/28/95 11/28/95 11/28/95 11/28/95 11/28/95 11/28/95 11/28/95 11/28/95 11/28/95 VENDOR NUMBER 001592 · 001592 001592 001592 001592 001592 000406 000406 000406 000406 000406 000406 000406 000406 000406 000406 000~06 000~06 000406 000406 000406 000406 000406 000406 000406 000406 000406 000406 000955 002047 002047 002047 000310 000978 002016 002016 000329 001980 VENDOR NAME RIVERSIDE CO. INFORMATI RIVERSIDE CO. INFORMATI RIVERSIDE CO, INFORMATI RIVERSIDE CO, ]NFORNATI RIVERSIDE CO. INFORMATI RIVERSIDE CO, INFORMATI RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF~S RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S RIVERSIDE CO, SHERIFF'S RIVERSIDE CO. SHER]FF~S RIVERSIDE CO, SHER]FF~S RIVERSIDE CO, SHERIFF~S RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF~S RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF~S RIVERSIDE CO, SHERIFF~S RIVERSIDE CO. SHERiFF'S RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF~S RIVERSIDE CO, SHERIFF~S RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF~S RIVERSIDE CO, SHERZFF~S RIVERSIDE CO, SHERIFF'S RIVERSIDE CO, SHERZFF~S RIVERSIDE CO, SHERIFF'S RIVERSIDE CO, SHERIFF'S RIVERSIDE CO, SHERIFF~S RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF-B SOIL TECH INC SOIL TECH INC SOIL TECH lNC TEMECULA CREEK INN, INC TRAUMA INTERVENTION PRO TSUTSUMIDA & ASSOCIATES TSUTSUNIDA & ASSOCIATES URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, IN WILLIAM SHERMAN COMPANY CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION CONRNET CONNECTION'CISCO 2500 CONRNET CONNECT]ON-HUB ROUTER CORNET CONNECTION-ASTROCONM DS DATA TECHNICIAN LABOR CONRNET CONNECTION-V,35 CABLE TAX LAW ENFORCEMENT -MAY/JUN 7,~95 LAW ENFORCEMENT -MAY/JUN 7,'95 LAW ENFORCEMENT -MAY/JUN 7,~95 LAW ENFORCEMENT -MAY/JUN 7~95 LAW ENFORCEMENT -MAY/JUN 7,'95 LAW ENFORCEMENT -MAY/JUN 7,~95 LAW ENFORCEMENT -NAY/JUN 7,~95 LAW ENFORCEMENT -NAY/JUN 7,'95 LAW ENFORCEMENT -MAY/JUN 7,#95 LAW ENFORCEMENT -MAY/JUN 7,'95 LAW ENFORCEMENT-JUNE 95 LAW ENFORCEMENT-JUNE 95 LAW ENFORCEMENT-JUNE 95 LAW ENFORCEMENT-JUNE 95 LAW ENFORCEMENT-JUNE 95 LAW ENFORCEMENT-JUNE 95 LAW ENFORCEMENT-JUNE 95 LAW ENFORCEMENT-JUNE 95 LAW ENFORCEMENT-JUNE 95 LAW ENFORCEMENT-JUNE 95 JUNE 95 BOOKING FEES CAL-ID ACCESS FOR SHERIFF DEPT BIKE PATROL FOR SEPT 1995 PROF SRVCS PARKVIEW SITE PROF SRVCS PARKVIEW SITE PROF SRVCS/PARKVIEW SITE COIqlqISSIONERS RECOGNITION TIP 1ST QUARTER 95-96 PROF SERVS TO DESIGN CiTY HALL NEW CITY HALL SPACE PLANNING CITYWIDE DESIGN GUIDELINES FEASIBILITY ANALYS~S/GOLF COUR ACCOUNT NUMBER 320-1970 320-1970 320-1970 320-1970 320-1970 320-1970 001-170-999-5288 001-170-999-5290 001-170-999-5291 001-170-999-5282 001-170-999-5299 001-170-999-5294 001-170-999-5262 001-170-999-5281 001-1230 001-170-999-52_34 001-170-999-5288 001-170-999-5298 001-170-999-5291 001-170-999-5282 001-170-999-5299 001-170-999-5294 001-170-999-5262 001-170-999-5281 001-12.30 001-170-999-5234 001-170-999-5275 001-170-999-5284 001-170-999-5326 210-199-128-5804 210-199-128-5804 210-199-128-5804 001-100-999-5265 001-171-999-5274 210-199-650-5804 210-199-650-5804 001-161-502-5248 001-199-999-5250 ITEM AMOUNT 1,816.50 2,000.00 2,464.00 960.00 70.00 337.16 197,931.04 5,832.24 3,874.12 2,919.62 29,230.74 10,715.54 12,937.68 17,212.92 3,874.12 6,396.35 155,625.17 21,808.62 4,179.42 1,023.57 26,178.40 9,487.43 15,599.21 18,952.24 4,179.42 5,254.14 12,696.00 27,702.00 1,136.70 390.00 2,521.75 1,650.00 2,829.61 1,312.50 1,515.00 1,761.36 2,680.00 5,050.00 PAGE 2 CHECK AMOUNT 7,647.66 593,609.99 1,136.70 4,561.75 2,829.61 1,312.50 3,276.36 2,680.00 5,050.00 TOTAL CHECKS 1,197,128.75 ITEM 4 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council City Clerk November 28, 1995 Records Destruction Approval ' RECOMMENDATION: Approve scheduled destruction of certain records as provided under the City of Temecula approved Records Retention Policy. BACKGROUND: On March 22, 1992, the City Council approved Resolution No. 92-17 which authorizes the destruction of certain city records which have become outdated, obsolete or are .excess documents, in compliance with Sections 34090 through 34090.7 of the Government Code. The records management program, administered by the City Clerk's Office, is in the process of microfilming all inactive records that are over two (2) years old. The attached exhibit details Encroachment Permits of 7/20/90 to 12/26/91; Conditional Use Case, Tract Maps, Parcel Merger, Public Works Projects from 6/25/84 to 2/14/92. These records have been microfilmed in triplicate with a copy distributed to the City Clerk's Records Vault, the Planning Department and one in permanent off-site storage. These records are all qualified for destruction at this time under the provisions of the Records Retention Schedule. The City Attorney has reviewed this request and has signed Exhibit "1" of' the Annual Review as provided for in Resolution No. 92-17. ATTACHMENTS: Destruction of Records Request List of Records recommended for destruction JSG FROM: DATE: City Clerk Paula Sargent Office Technician November 28, 1995 Destruction of Records Request Attached is a print out of: Encroachmant Permits (Retention Code 80205) of 7/20/90 (~)(}(}66) to 12/26/91 ($91324); Conditional Use Case, Tract Maps, Parcel Merger, Public Works Projects (Retention Code 80605) from 6/25/84 (//02708) to 2/14/92 (~r23100). These records have been microfilmed in triplicate with a copy distributed to the City Clerk's Records Vault, the Public Works DeparUnent and a copy to the Vault in San Diego. The undersigned have reviewed and approved this destruction request. Pursuant to the requirements of Govel~ment Code Section 34090, I hereby give my consent to the destruction of records under the direction of the City Clerk pursuant to the City of Temecula's adopted Destruction of Obsolete Records Policy. Depati~,ent ~ · saph Kicak Public. Works Depat i~itent //- / J".~',~. . City Attorney: ~///4, ~ " Date . :.' R:\formi~d~sttuot.rqa RRDESTY...RR061 City of Temecula Doc. Ref ......... 163 Rage 1 11/07/1995 Files Ready for Destruction Retention Code... 80205 09:05:05 Destruction Date. 11/28/1995 Doc. Item Ret. File Reference # Storage Media Date Ref. Brief Description Code Security Class Storage Location Location Reference 163 07/20/1990 90066 Encroachment Rermit 90-066 80205 0050 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 07/20/1990 90067 Encroachment Permit 90-067 80205 0050 Film 3821MIAO001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 07/20/1990 90068 Encroachment Permit 90-068 80205 0050 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 07/23/1990 90065 Encroachment Permit 90-065 80205 0050 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 07/23/1990 90069 Encroachment Permit 90-069 80205 0050 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The vault 163 07/23/1990 90073 Encroachment Permit 90-073 80205 0050 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 07/24/1990 90070 Encroachment Permit 901070 80205 0050 Film 3821MiA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 07/24/1990 90071 Encroachment Permit 90-071 80205 0050 Film 3821M1A0001 G~oup I 163/120/The Vault 07/25/1990 90072 Encroachment Permit 90-072 80205 0050 Film 3821MIA0001 GrOup I 163/120/The Vault 163 07/25/1990 90074 Encroachment Permit 90-074 80205 0050 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 07/25/1990 90075 Encroachment Remit 90-075 80205 0050 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 07/25/1990 90076 Encroachment Permit 90-076 80205 0050 Film 3821MIA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 07/25/1990 90077 Encroachment Permit 90-077 80205 0050 Film 3821MiA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 07/25/1990 90078 Encroachment Permit 90-078 80205 0050 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 07/26/1990 90079 Encroachment Permit 90-079 ~0205 0050 Film 3821MiA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 16t 07/27/1990 90080- Encroachment Permit 90-080 80205 0051) Film 3821MIA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 07/27/1990 90081 Encroachment Permit 90-081 80205 0050 Film 3821MIA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 07/30/1990 90082 Encroachment Permit 90-082 80205 0050 Film 3821MiA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault RRDESTY...RR061 City of Temecula Page 2 11/07/1995 Files Ready for Destruction 09:05:05 Doc. Item Ret. File Reference # Storage Media Ref. Date Ref. Brief Description Code Security Class Storage Location Location Refere' 163 07/30/1990 90084 Encroachment Permit 90-084 80205 0050 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 07/30/1990 90085 Encroachment Permit 90-085 80205 0050 Film 3821MiA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 07/31/1990 90086 Encroachment Permit 90-086 80205 0050 Film 3821MiA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 07/31/1990 90087 Encroachment Permit 90-087 80205 0050 Film 3821MIA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 07/31/1990 90088 Encroachment Permit 90-088 80205 0050 Film 3821MIA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault. 163 07/31/1990 90089 Encroachment Permit 90-089 80205 0050 Film 3821MIA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 07/31/1990 90090 Encroachment Permit 90-090 80205 0050 Film 3821MIA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 07/31/1990 90091 Encroachment Permit 90-091 80205 0050 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 07/31/1990 90092 Encroachment Permit 90-092 80205 0050 Film 3821MIA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 08/01/1990 90093 Encroachment Permit 90-093 80205 0050 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 08/01/1990 90094 Encroachment Permit 90-094 80205 0050 Film 3821MIA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 08/01/1990 90095 Encroachment Permit 90-095 80205 0050 Film 3821MIA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 08/01/1990 90096 Encroachment Permit 90-096 8O205 0050 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 08/06/1990 90097 Encroachment Permit 90-097 80205 0050 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 08/07/1990 90099 Encroachment Permit 90-099 80205 0050 Film 3821MIA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163' 08/08/1990 90100- Encroachment Permit 90-100 80205 00~0 Film 3821MiA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 08/09/1990 90111 Encroachment Permit 90-111 80205 0050 Film 3821MiA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 08/10/1990 90101 Encroachment Permit 90-101 80205 0050 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault RRDESTY...RR061 City of Temecula Page 3 11/07/1995 Files Ready for Destruction 09:0S:05 Doc. Item ReU. File Reference # Storage Media Date Ref. Brief Description Code Security Class Storage Location Location Reference 1~ 08/13/1990 90102 Encroachment Petit 90-102 8020~ 0050 Film 3821M~0001 Group I 163/120/~e Vaul~ 163 08/13/1990 90103 ~croac~n= Pe~i~ 90-103 80205 0050 Film 3821M~0001 Group I 163/120/The Vaul= 163 08/15/1990 90104 Encroac~ent Pemi~ 90-104 80205 0050 Film 3821M~0001 Group I 163/120/The Vaul= 163 08/15/1990 90105 Encroac~en~ Pe~ 90-105 80205 0050 Film 3821MIA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vauln 163 08/15/1990 90106 Encroac~enn Pemi~ 90-106 8020~ 00~0 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vauln 163 08/16/1990 90108 Encroac~en~ Pe~i~ 90-108 80205 0050 Film 382~1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vaul~ 163 08/20/1990 90112 Encroac~en~ Pemin-90-112 80205 0050 Film 3821M~0001 Group I 163/120/~e Vaul~ 163 08/21/1990 90113 Encroac~nn Pemi~ 90-113 80205 0050 Film 3821M~0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 08/21/1990 90114 Encroac~en~ Pem~ 90-114 80205 0050 Film 3821M~0001 Group I 163/120/The Vaul= 163 08/21/1990 90115 Encroac~en~ Petit 90-115 80205 0050 Film 382~0001 Group I 163/120/The Vaul~ 163 08/21/1990 90116 Encroac~en~ Pemi= 90-116 80205 0050 Film 382~0001 Group I 163/120/~e Vaul~ 163 08/2121990 90117 Encroac~en= Pe~i~ 90-117 80205 0050 Film 3821M~0001 Group I 163/120/~e vault 163 08/22/1990 90118 ~croac~en~ Pe~i~ 90-1~8 80205 00~0 Film 3821M~0001 Group I 163/120/The Vaul~ 163 08/23/1990 90119 Encroac~en= Pe~i~ 90-119 80205 0050 Film 3821M~0001 Group I 163/120/~e Vaul~ 163 08/23/~990 90120 Encroac~enE Pemi= 90-120 80205 0050 Film 3821~0001 Group I 163/120/~e Vaul~ 163 08/23/1990 90122 Encroac~nn Pemi= 90-122 80205 00~0 Film 382180001 Group I 163/120/The Vaul= 163 08/23/1990 90123 Encroachmen~ Pemi= 90-123 8020~ 0050 Film 3821M~0001 Group I 163/120/The Vauln 08/23/1990 90124 Encroac~n= Pemi~ 90-124 80205 0050 Film 3821M~000~ Group I 163/120/~e Vaul~ 'RRDESTY...RR061 City of Temecula Page 4 11/07/1995 Files ReadV for Destruction 09:05:05 Doc. Item Ret. File Reference # Storage Media Ref. Date Ref. Brief Description Code Security Class Storage Location Location Refer- Film 3821MIA0001 163 08/24/1990 90125 Encroachment Permit 90-125 80205 0050 Group I 163/120/The Vault 3821MIAO001 163 08/24/1990 90126 Encroachment Permit 90-126 80205 0050 Film Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 08/27/1990 90127 Encroachment Permit 90-127 80205 0050 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 08/27/1990 90128 Encroachment Permit 90-128 80205 0050 Film 3821MiA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 08/27/1990 90129 Encroachment Permit 90-129 80205 0050 Film 3821MIA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 08/28/1990 90130 Encroachment Permit 90-130 80205 0050 Film 3821MIA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 183 08/28/1990 90131 Encroachment Permit 90-131 80205 00S0 Film 3821MIA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 08/28/1990 90132 Encroachment Permit 90-132 80205 0050 Film 3821MiA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 08/28/1990 90133 Encroachment Permit 90-133 80205 0050 Film 3821MIA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 08/28/1990 90134 Encroachment Permit 90-134 80205 0050 Film 3821MiA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 08/28/1990 90135 Encroachment Permit 90-135 80205 0050 Film 3821MiA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 08/28~/1990 90136 .Encroachment Permit 90-136 80205 0050 Film 382.1MiA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 08/29/1990 90137 Encroachment Permit 90-137 80205 0050 Film 3821MiA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 08/29/1990 90138 Encroachment Permit 90-138 80205 0050 Film 3821MiA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 08/30/1990 90139 Encroachment Permit 90-139 80205 0050 Film 3821MIA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 1'b'3 08/30/1990 90140 Encroachment Permit 90-140 80205 0050 Film 3821MIA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 08/31/1990 90141 Encroachment Permit 90-141 80205 0050 Film 3821MIA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 08/31/1990 90142 Encroachment Permit 90-142 80205 0050 Film 3821MiA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault RRDESTY...RR061 City of Temecula Page 5 11/07/1995 Files Ready for Destruction 09:05:05 Doc. Item Ret. File Reference # Storage Media ~ ', Date Ref. Brief Description Code Security Class Storage Location Location Reference 163 09/04/1990 90143 Encroachment Permit 90-143 80205 0050 Film 3821M1AO001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 09/04/1990 90144 Encroachment Permit 90-144 80205 0050 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 09/04/1990 90145 Encroachment Permit 90-145 80205 0050 Film 3821MIA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 09/04/1990 90146 Encroachment Permit 90-146 80205 0050 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 09/06/1990 90148 Encroachment Permit 90-148 80205 0050 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault .................................................... r ............. 163 09/06/1990 90149 Encroachment Permit 90-149 80205 0050 Film 3821MiA0001 · Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 09/10/1990 90153 Encroachment Permit 90-153 80205 0050 Film 3821MIA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 09/10/1990 90155 Encroachment Permit 90-155 80205 0050 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault ~ 09/11/1990 90156 Encroachment Permit 90-156 80205 0050 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 09/12/1990 901~8 Encroachment Permit 90-158 80205 0050 Film 3821MIA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 09/12/1990 90159 Encroachment Permit 90-159 80205 0050 Film 3821MiA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 09/12/1990 90160 Encroachment Permit 90-160 80205 0050 Film 3821MIA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 09/13/1990 90161 Encroachment Permit 90-161 80205 0050 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The'vault 163 09/13/1990 90162 Encroachment Permit 90-162 80205 0050 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 09/17/1990 90165 Encroachment Permit 90-165 80205 0050 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 16) 09/17/1990 '90166 Encroachment Permit 90-166 80205 0050 Film 3821MiA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 09/18/1990 90167 Encroachment Permit 90-167 80205 0050 Film 3821MIA0001 Group I 163/120/The vault . ................. : ............................................. 09/18/1990 90170 Encroachment Permit 90-170 80205 0050 Film 3821MIA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault RRDESTY...RR061 City of Temecula Page 6 11/07/1995 Files Ready for Destruction 09.'05:05 Doc. Item Ret. File Reference # Storage Media Ref. Date Ref. Brief Description Code Security Class Storage Location Location Refere- - 163 09/18/1990 90171 Encroachment PerTnit 90-171 80205 0050 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 09/19/1990 90169 Encroachment Permit 90-169 80205 0050 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 183/120/The Vault 163 09/20/1990 90172 Encroachment Permit 90-172 80205 0050 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 09/20/1990 90173 Encroachment Permit 90-173 80205 0050 Film 3821MIA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 09/20/1990 90174 Encroachment Permit 90-174 80205 0050 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault' 163 09/24/1990 90150 Encroachment Permit 90-150 80205 0050 Film 3821MLA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 09/24/1990 90151 Encroachment Permit 90-151 80205 0050 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 09/24/1990 90152 Encroachment Permit 90-152 80205 0050 Film 3821MIA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 09/24/1990 90176 Encroachment Permit 90-176 80205 0050 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 09/25/1990 90178 Encroachment Permit 90-178 80205 0050 Film 3821MiA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 09/25/1990 90180 Encroachment Permit 90-180 80205 0050 Film 3821MIA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 09/26/1990 90181 Encroachment Permit 90-181 80205 0050 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 09/27/1990 90177 Encroachment Permit 90-177 80205 0050 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 09/28/1990 90182 Encroachment Permit 90-182 80205 0050 Film 3821MIA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 09/28/1990 90183 Encroachment Permit 90-183 80205 0050 Film 3821MIA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault ............ T ..................................................... 16~/ 09/28/1990 90184 Encroachment Permit 90-184 80205 00~0 Film 3821MiA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 09/28/1990 90185 Encroachment Permit 90-185 80205 0050 Film 3821MIA0001 Group I 163/120/The vault 163 09/28/1990 90186 Encroachment Permit 90-186 80205 0050 Film 3821MIA0001 Group I 163/120/The vault RRDESTY...RR061 Ci=V of Temecula Page 7 11/07/1995 Files ReadV for Destruction 09:05:05 Doc. Item Ret. File Reference # Storage Media -'- Date Ref. Brief Descripnion Code Security Class Storage Location Location Reference l~a 09/28/1990 90187 Encroachment Permit 90-187 80205 0050' Film 3821MIA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 09/28/1990 90188 Encroachment Permit 90-188 80205 0050 Film 3821MIA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 09/28/1990 90189 Encroachment Permit 90-189 80205 0050 Film 3821MiA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 10/03/1990 90190 Encroachment Permit 90-190 80205 0050 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 10/03/1990 90191 Encroachment Permit 90-191 80205 0050 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 10/04/1990 90193 Encroachment Permit 90-193 80205 0050 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vaul: 163 10/05/1990 90195 Encroachment Permit 90~195 80205 0050 Film 3821MIA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 10/05/1990 90197 Encroachment Fermit 90-197 80205 0050 Film 3821MiA0001 Group I 163/120/The vault "' 10/05/1990 90198 Encroachment Permit 90-198 80205 0050 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 10/08/1990 90157 Encroachment Permit 90-157 80205 0050 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The vault 163 10/08/1990 90196 Encroachment Permit 90-196 80205 0050 Film 382180001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 10/08/1990 90199 Encroachment Permit 90-199 80205 0050 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 10/09/1990 90179 Encroachment Permit 90-179 80205 0050 Film 3821MiA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 10/09/1990 90200 Encroachment Permit 90-200 80205 0050 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 10/09/1990 90201 Encroachment Permit 90-201 8D205 0050 Film 3821MiA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 10/10/1990. 90163 Encroachment Permit 90-163 80205 00~0 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 10/11/1990 90202 Encroachment Permit 90-202 80205 0050 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 10/11/1990 90203 Encroachment Permit 90-203 80205 0050 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault ~...RR061 City of Temecula Page 8 11/07/1995 " Files Ready for Destruction 09:05:05 Doc. Item Ret. File Reference # Storage Media Ref. Date Ref. Brief Description Code Security Class Storage Location Location Referen~, 163 10/15/1990 90204 Encroachment Permit 90-204 80205 00S0. Film 3821MIA0001 Group I 163/120/The vault 163 10/16/1990 90205 Encroachment Permit 90-205 80205 0050 Film 3821MIA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 10/17/1990 90206 Encroachment Permit 90-206 80205 0050 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 10/17/1990 90207 Encroachment Permit 90-207 80205 0050 Film 3821MiA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 10/17/1990 90209 Encroachment Permit 90-209 80205 0050 Film 3821MiA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 10/17/1990 90210 Encroachment Permit 90-210 80205 0050 Film 3821MLA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 10/17/1990 90211 Encroachment Permit 90-211 80205 0050 Film 3821MIA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 10/17/1990 90212 Encroachment Permit 90-212 80205 0050 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 10/18/1990 90213 EncrOachment Permit 90-213 80205 0050 Film 3821MIA0001 Group' I 163/120/The Vault 163 10/18/1990 90214 Encroachment Permit 90-214 80205 0050 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 10/18/1990 90215 Encroachment Permit 90-215 80205 0050 Film 3821MiA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 10/19/1990 90216 Encroachment Permit 90-216 80205 0050 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The vault 163 10/22/1990 90217 Encroachment Permit 90-217 80205 0050 Film 3821MiA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 10/23/1990 90218 Encroachmenn Permit 90-218 80205 0050 Film 3821MiA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 ~0/24/1990 90220 Encroachment Permit 90-220 80205 0051 Film 3821MiA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 16} 10/25/1990 90221 Encroachment Permit 90-221 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 10/25/1990 90222 Encroachment Permit 90-222 80205 0051 Film 3821MLA0001 G~roup I 163/120/The Vault 163 10/25/1990 90233 Encroachment Permit 90-233 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault RRDESTY...RR061 City of Temecula Page 9 11/07/1995 Files Ready for Destruction 09: 05: 05 Doc. Item Ret. File Reference # Storage Media ~ Date Ref. Brief Description Code Security Class Storage Location Location Reference lua 10/26/1990 90225 Encroachment Permit 90-225 80205 0051' Film 3821MLA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 10/26/1990 90226 Encroachment Permit 90-226 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 10/26/1990 90227 Encroachment Permit 90-227 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 10/26/1990 90230 Encroachment Permit 90-230 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 10/27/1990 90228 Encroachment Permit 90-228 80205 0051 Film 3821MiA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 10/27/1990 90229 Encroachment Permit 90-229 80205 0051 Film 3821MLA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 10/27/1990 90244 Encroachment Permit 90-244 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 10/30/1990 90219 Encroachment Permit 90-219 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001 Group I 163/120/The vault · ' 10/30/1990 90232 Encroachment Permit 90-232 80205 0051 Film 3821M1AO001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 10/30/1990 90233 Encroachment Permit 90-233, 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 10/30/1990 90237 Encroachment Permit 90-237 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 10/30/~990 90238 Encroachment Permit 90-238 80205 0051 Film 3821MLA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 10/31/1990 90231 Encroachment Permit 90231 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 10/31/1990 90235 Encroachment Permit 90-235 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 11/01/1990 90234 Encroachment Permit 90-234 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 18 11/01/1990 90236 Encroachment Permit 90-236 80205 0051 Film 3821MiA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 11/01/1990 NPDES NPDES 80205 0052# 0053° 0054 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 11/06/1990 90241 Encroachment Permit 90-241 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault RRDESTY...RR061 City of Temecula Page 10 11/07/1995 Files Ready for Destruction 09:05:05 Doc. Item Ret. File Reference # Storage Media Ref. Date Ref. Brief Description Code Security Class Storage Location Location RefereD~a~ 163 11/07/1990 90243 Encroachment Permit 90-234 80205 00fl Film 3821MIA0001 Group I 164/120/The Vault 163 11/07/1990 90244 Encroachment Permit 90-244 80205 0051 Film 3821M1AO001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 11/07/1990 90245 Encroachment Permit 90-245 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 11/10/1990 90249 Encroachment Permit 90-249 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 11/10/1990 90250 Encroachment Permit 90-250 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 11/14/1990 90248 Encroachment Permit 90-248 80205 0051 Film 3821MiA0001 Group I 163/120/The vault 163 11/15/1990 90252 Encroachment Permit 90-252 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 11/15/1990 90253 Encroachment Permit 90-253 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 11/20/1990 90254 Encroachment Permit 90-254 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 11/20/1990 90255 Encroachment Permit 90-25'5 80205 0051 Film 3821MiA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 11/20/1990 90256 Encroachment Permi~ 90-256 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 11/21/1990 90257 Encroachment Permit 90-257 80205 0051 Film 3821MiA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 11/21/1990 90258 Encroachment Permit 90-258 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 11/27/1990 90259 Encroachment Permit 90-259 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 11/27/1990 90260 Encroachment Permit 90-260 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault ~6a 11/27/1990 90261 Encroachment Permit 90-261 80205 0OS1 Film 3821MLA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 11/28/1990 90247 Encroachment Permit 90-247 80205 0051 Film 3821MiA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 11/28/1990 90263 Encroachment Fermit 90-263 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The vault RRDESTY...RR061 City of Temecula Page 11 11/07/1995 Files Ready for Destruction 09:05:05 Doc. Item Ret. File Reference # Storage Media r~-- Date Ref. Brief Description Code Security Class Storage Location Location Reference 1~ 11/28/1990 90264 Encroachment Permit 90-264 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 11/28/1990 90265 Encroachment Permit 90-265 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 11/29/1990 '90262 Encroachment Permit 90262 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 11/30/1990 90266 Encroachment Permit 90-266 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 11/30/1990 90267 Encroachment Permit 90-267 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 11/30/1990 90272 Encroachment Permit 90-272 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001 · Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 11/30/1990 90273 Encroachment Permit 90-273 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The vault 163 12/01/1990 90269 Encroachment Permit 90-269 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The vault '~ 12/03/1990 90268 Encroachment Permit 90-268 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 12/04/1990 90270 Encroachment Permit 90-270 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 12/06/1990 90274 Encroachment Permit 90-274 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 12/10/1990 90242 Encroachment Permit 90-242 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 12/10/1990 90275 Encroachment Permit 90-275 80205 0051 Film 3821MiA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 12/10/1990 90276 Encroachment Permit 90-276 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 12/10/1990 90277 Encroachment Permit 90-277 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 16~ 12/10/1990 '90279 Encroachment Permit 90-279 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 12/11/1990 90282 Encroachment Permit 90-282 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 12/12/1990 90280 Encroachment Permit 90-280 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault RRDESTY...RR061 Ci=V of Temecula ~sge 12 11/07/1995 Files ReadV for Destruction 0~:~5:05 Doc. IUem Ret. File Reference # Storage Media Ref. Dace Ref. Brief Description Code Security Class Storage Location Location Refere~ 163 12/17/1990 90283 Encroachment Permit 90-283 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 12/18/1990 90271 Encroachment Permit 90-271 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 12/18/1990 90285 Encroachmenn Permit 90-285 80205 0051 Film 3821MiA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vaulc 163 12/18/1990 90286 Encroachment Permit 90-286 80205 00S1 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The vault 163 12/19/1990 90287 Encroachment Permit 90-287 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 12/19/1990 90288 Encroachment Permit 90-288 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The VaulU 163 12/20/1990 90289 Encroachment Permit 90-289 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 12/20/1990 90290 Encroachmenc Permic 90-290 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 12/20/1990 90291 Encroachment Permit 90-291 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001 --. Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 12/20/1990 90292 Encroachmen: Permit 90-292 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 12/24/1990 90294 Encroachment Permit 90-294 80205 0051 Film 3821MiA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 12/27/1990 90296 Encroachment Permit 90-296 80205 0051 Film 3821MiA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 12/27/1990 90297 Encroachment Permi~ 90-297 80205 00S1 Film 3821MiA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 13/28/1990 90300 Encroachment Permit 90-300 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001 Group I 153/120/The Vault 163 12/28/1990 90301 Encroachment Permi~ 90-301 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The vault 1~3 12/31/1990 90281 Encroachmen~ Permit 90-281 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vaul~ ................................................................. 7 163 12/31/1990 90295 Encroachment Permit 90-295 80205 0051 Film 3821MiA0001 Group I 153/120/The Vault 163 12/31/1990 90299 Encroachment Permit 90-299 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault RRDESTY...RR061 City of Temecula Page 13 11/07/1995 Files Ready for Destruction 09:05:05 Doc. Item Ret. File Reference # Storage Media Date Ref. Brief Description Code Security Class Storage ~oca=ion Location Reference 163 12/31/1990 90302 Encroachment Permit 90-302 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 12/31/1990 90303 Encroachment Permit 90-303 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 12/31/1990 90304 Encroachment Permit 90-304 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 12/31/1990 90305 Encroachment Permit 90-305 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 12/31/1990 90306 Encroachment Permit 90-306 80205 0051 Film 3821MiA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 01/04/1991 91005 Encroachment Permit 91-005 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 01/18/1991 90233 Encroachment Permit 90-233 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 01/25/1991 90298 Encroachment Permit 90-298 80205 0051 Film 3821MLA0001 droup I 163/120/The Vault 04/09/1991 90251 Encroachment Permit 90-251 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 05/08/1991 91149 Encroachment Permit 91-149 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 05/08/1991 91150 Encroachment Permit 91-150 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 05/09/1991 91151 Encroachment Permit 91-151 80205 0051 Film 3821MLA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 05/13/1991 91152 Encroachment Permit 91-152 80205 0051 Film 3821MLA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 05/14/1991 91153 Encroachment Permit 91-153 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 05/17/1991 91154 Encroachment Permit 91-154 '80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault lb'3 05/18/1991 91155 Encroachment Permit 91-155 80205 0~1 Film 3821MiA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 05/23/1991 91156 Encroachment Permit 91-156 80205 0051 Film 3821MiA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 05/23/1991 91157 Encroachment Permit 91-157 80205 0051 Film 3821MiA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault RRDESTY...RR061 City of Temecula Page 14 11/07/1995 Files Ready for Destruc=ion 09:05:05 Doc. Item Ret. File Reference # Storage Media Ref. Date Ref. Brief Description Code Security Class Storage Location Location Referees- 163 05/24/1991 91158 Encroachment Permit 91-158 80205 0051 Film 3821MiA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vaul: 163 05/24/1991 91159 Encroac~nn Pe~i~ 91-159 80205 0051 Film 3821M~0001 Grip I 163/120/The vaul~ 163 05/28/1991 91160 Encroachment Pemi~ 91-160 80205 0051 Film 3821MiA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vaul~ 163 05/31/199Z 91161 Encroac~en= Pemin 91-161 80205 0051 Film 3821M~0001 Group I 163/120/The Vaul= 163 05/31/1991 9~162 Encroac~en= Perle 91-162 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vaul~ 163 05/31/1991 91166 Encroac~en~ Pemi= 91-166 80205 0051 Film 3821M~0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 06/03/1991 91163 Encroac~en= Pe~iu 91-163 80205 0051 Film 3821M~0001 Group I 163/120/The Vaul~ 163 06/04/1991 91164 Encroac~enn Pemi~ 91-164 80205 0051 Film 3821~0001 ~roup I 163/120/The Vaul~ 163 06/0~/1991 91165 Encroac~enn Pemn 91-165 80205 0051 Film Grou~ I 163/120/The Vaul~ 163 06/07/1991 91167 Encroachmen~ Petit 91-167 80205 0051 Film 3821M~0001 Group I 163/120/The Vaul~ 163 06/07/1991 91168 ~croac~en= Pemi~ 91-168 80205 0051 Film 3821M~0001 Group I 163/120/~e Vaul~ 163 06/11/1991 91169 ~croac~en~ Pemin 91-169 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vauln 163 06/12/1991 91170 ~croac~en~ Pe~i~ 91-170 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 06/13/1991 91171 ~croac~en~ Pe~i~ 91-171 80205 0051 Film 3821~0001 Group I 163/120/The Vaul~ 163 .06/14/1991 91172 ~croac~en~ Pe~i= 91-172 80205 0051 Film 3821M~0001 Group I 163/120/The Vaul= 1~ 06/17/1991 9117B ~croac~enC Pem~ 91-173 80205 0~1 Film 3821M~0001 Group I 163/~20/The Vaul~ 163 06/17/1991 91174 ~croac~enc Pemi~ 91-174 80205 0051 Film 382~0001 Group I 163/120ZThe Vaul~ 163 06/17/1991 91175 ~cr~c~en= Pe~i= 91-175 80205 00~1 Film 3821M~0001 Group I 163/120/~e vaul~ RRDESTY...RR061 City of Temecula Page 15 11/07/1995 Files Ready for Destruction 09:05:05 Doc. Item Ret. File Reference # Storage Media '~"' Date Ref. Brief Description Code Security Class Storage Location Location Reference 163 06/18/1991 91176 Encroachment Permit 91-176 88205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 06/19/1991 91177 Encroachment Permit 91-177 80205 0051 Film 3821MiA0001 Group I 163/120/The vault 163 06/19/1991 91178 Encroachment Permit 91-178 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 06/21/1991 91180 Encroachment Permit 91-180 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001 Group I 163/120/The vault 163 06/24/1991 91179 Encroachment Permit 91-179 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 06/25/1991 91181 Encroachment Permit 91-181 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001 Group I 163/120/The vault 163 06/25/1991 91182 Encroachment Permit '91-182 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 06/25/1991 91183 Encroachment Permit 91-183 80205 0051 Film 3821MiA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 06/25/1991 91184 Encroachment Permit 91-184 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 06/25/1991 91185 Encroachment Permit 91-185 80205 0051 Film 3821MiA0001 Group I 163/120/The vault .......................... . ............ ~ ........................... 163 06/26/1991 91186 Encroachment Permit 91-186 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The vault 163 07/10.91991 91190 Encroachment Permit 91-190 80205 00$1 Film 382iM1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 07/11/1991 91191 Encroachment Permit 91-191 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The vault 163 07/15/1991 91192 Encroachment Permit 91-192 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 07/17/1991 91193 Encroachment Permit 91-193 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 183 07/22/1991 91194 Encroachment Permit 91-194 80205 0081 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 07/25/1991 91198 Encroachment Permit 91-198 80205 00S1 Film 3821MiA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 07/29/1991 91199 Encroachment Permit 91-199 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault RRDESTY...RR061 City of Temecula Page 16 11/07/1995 Files Ready for Destruction 09:05:05 Doc. Item Ret. File Reference # Storage Media Ref. Date Ref. Brief Description Code Security Class Storage Location Location Refere~" 163 07/30/1991 91200 Encroachment Permit 91-200 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 07/30/1991 91201 Encroachment Permit 91-201 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 08/01/1991 91206 Encroachment Permit 91-206 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The VaulE 163 08/02/1991 91207 Encroachment Permit 91-207 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 08/06/1991 91208 Encroachment Permit 91-208 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 08/06/1991 91209 Encroachment Permit 91-209 80205 0051 Film 3821MiA0001 Group I 163/120/The vault 163 08/06/1991 91210 Encroachment Permit"91-210 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The vault 163 08/06/1991 91211 Encroachment Permit 91-211 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 08/07/1991 91212 Encroachment Permit 91-212 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 08/07/1991 91213 Encroachment Permit 91-213 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 08/07/1991 91214 Encroachment Permit 91-214 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 08/07/1991 91215 Encroachment Permit 91-215 80205 0051 Film 3821MLA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 08/08/1991 91216 Encroachment Permit 91-216 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 08/08/3991 91217 Encroachment Permi~ 91-217 80205 0051 Film 3821MiA0001 Group I 163/120/The vault 163 08/08/1991 91218 Encroachment Permit 91-218 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 16T 08/15/1991 91222 Encroachment Permit 91-222 80205 0081 Film 3821MIA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 08/15/1991 91223 Encroachment Permit 91-223 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 08/19/1991 91224 Encroachment Permit 91-224 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault RRDESTY...RR061 City of Temecula Page 17 11/07/1995 Files Ready for Destruction 09:05:05 Doc. Item Ret. File Reference # Storage Media r~ "- Date Ref. Brief Description Code Security Class Storage Location Location Reference 16j 08/19/1991 91225 Encroachment Permit 91-225 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 08/19/1991 91226 Encroachment Permit 91-226 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 08/20/1991 91227 Encroachment Permit 91-227 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 08/22/1991 91228 Encroachment Permit 91-228 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 08/22/1991 91229 Encroachment Permit 91-229 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 08/26/1991 91205 Encroachment Permit 91-205 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 08/26/1991 91230 Encroachment Permit 91-230 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 08/27/1991 91231 EncroaChment Permit 91-231 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault ) 08/30/1991 91232 Encroachment Permit 91-232 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001 Group.. I 163/120/The Vault 163 08/30/1991 912,34 Encroachment Permit 91-234 80205 0051 Film 3821MiA0001 Group I 163/120/The vault 163 09/04/1991 91235 Encroachment Permit 91-235 80205 0051 Film 3821MiA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 09/05/1991 91236 Encroachment Permit 91-236 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 09/05/1991 91237 Encroachment Permit 91-237 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001 Group I 163/120/The 'Vault 163 09/06/1991 91238 Encroachment Permit 91-238 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 09/09/1991 91239 Encroachment Permit 91-239 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 169 09/09/1991 91240 Encroachment Permit 91-240 80205 0051 Film 3821MiA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 09/11/1991 91241 Encroachment Permit 91-241 80205 0051 Film 3821MiA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 09/12/1991 91242 Encroachment Permit 91-242 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault RRDCSTY...RR061 City of Temecula Page 18 11/07/1995 Files Ready for Destruction 0~:05:05 Doc. Item Ret. File Reference # Storage Media Ref. Date Ref. Brief Description Code SecuritV Class Storage Location Location Refere--~ 163 09/12/1991 91243 Encroachment Permit 91-243 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 09/16/1991 91244 Encroachment Permit 91-244 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 09/16/1991 91245 Encroachment Permit 91-245 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 09/17/1991 91246 Encroachment Permit 91-246 80205 0051 Film 3821MiA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 09/18/1991 91249 Encroachment Permit 91-249 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The vaul6 163 09/20/1991 91251 Encroachment Permit 91-251 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 09/23/1991 91252 Encroachment Permit 91-252 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 09/23/1991 91253 Encroachment Permit 91-253 80205 0061 Film 3821MiA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 09/23/1991 91254 EnCroachment Permit 91-254 . 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 09/25/1991 91248 Encroachment Permit 91-248 80205 0051 Film 3821MiA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 09/25/1991 91255 Encroachment Permit 91-255 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 09/27/1991 91258 Encroachment Permit 91-258 80205 0051 Film 3821MiA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault ....................................... T ...................... ' .... 163 09/30/1991 91257 Encroachment Permit 91-257 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001 Group I 163/120/The vault 163 09/30/1991 91260 Encroachment Permit 91-260 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 10/01/1991 91262 Encroachment Permit 91-262 80205 0051 Film 3821MiA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault l~F3 10/01/1991 91263 EncroaChment Permit 91-263 80205 00~1 Fil~ 3821MIA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 10/02/1991 91264 Encroachment Permit 91-264 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The vault 163 10/04/1991 91265 Encroachment Permit 91-265 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault RRDESTY...RR061 City of Temecula Page 19 11/07/1995 Files Ready for Destruction 09:05:05 Doc. Item Ret. File Reference # Storage Media ~"'~- Da=e Ref. Brief Description Code Security Class Storage Location Location Reference lu~ 10/08/1991 91261 Encroachment Permit 91-261 80205 0051. Film 3821MIA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 10/08/1991 91266 Encroachment Permit 91-266 80205 0051 Film 3821M~0001 Group ~ 163/120/~e vaul~ 163 ' 10/08/1991 91267 Encroachmen= Pem~ 91-267 80205 0051 Film 3821MiA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vaul= 163 10/08/1991 91268 Encroac~en= Pemi~ 91-268 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vaul= 163 10/14/1991 9~272 Encroachmen= Pe~i~ 91-272 8020~ 00~1 Film 3821M~0001 Group I 163/120/The Vaul= 163 10/15/1991 91273 Encroachmenn Pemi~ 91-273 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001 Group I 163/120/~e Vaulz 163 10/15/1991 91274 ~ncroac~en= Pemi= 91-274 8020~ 00~1 Film 3821M~0001 Group I 163/120/~e Vaul~ 163 10/15/1991 91275 Encroachmen~ Pemi~ 91-275 80205 0051 Film 3821M~0001 Group I 163/120/~e Vault ~ 10/16/1991 91276 Encroac~en~ Pe~i= 91-276 80205 00~1 Film 3821M~0001 Group I 163/120/The vaul= 163 10/16/1991 91277 Encroac~en~ Pemi~ 91-277 80205 0051 Film 3821M~0001 Group I 163/120/~e Vault 163 10/!7/1991 91278 ~ncroac~en~ Pem~ 91-278 80205 0051 Film 3821M~0001 Group I 163/120/The Vaul~ 163 10/17/1991 91279 Encroac~enn Pemi= 91-279 80205 0051 Film 3821M~0001 Group I 163/120/~e Vaul~ 163 10/17/1991 91280 Encroac~ent Pemi~ 91-280 80205 0051 Film 3821MiA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 10/18/1991 91282 Encroac~en~ Pemit 91-282 80205 0051 Film 3821M~0001 Group I 163/120/The Vaul~ 163 10/18/1991 91283 Encroac~en~ Pemin 91-283 ~0205 0051 Film 3821M~0001 Group I 163/120/The Vaul~ 163 10/21/199~. 91284 Encroach~n~ Pe~i~ 91-284 80205 00~1 Film 3821MiA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vaul~ 163 10/21/1991 91285 Encroac~en~ Petit 91-285 80205 0051 Film 3821M~0001 Group I 163/120/The Vaul= 10/23/1991 91286 Encroac~ent Pemit 91-286 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vaul~ RJU~ESTY...RR061 C~y of Temec~la Page 20 11/07/1995 " Files Ready for Dest~ction 0~:05:0S Doc. Item Ret. File Reference # Storage Media Ref. Date Ref. Brief Description Code Security Class Storage Location Location Refere~-~,. 163 10/23/1991 91287 Encroachment Permit 91-287 80205 0051. Film 3821MLA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 10/24/1991 91288 Encroachment Permit 91-288 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 10/24/1991 91289 Encroachment Permit 91-289 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 10/25/1991 91290 Encroachment Permit 91-290 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 10/28/1991 91291 Encroachment Permit 91-291 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 10/29/1991 91292 Encroachment Permit 91-292 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 10/29/1991 91293 Encroachment Permit 91-293 80205 0051 Film 3821MiA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 11/05/1991 91300 Encroachment Permit 91-300 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 11/08/1991 91295 Encroachment Permit 91-295 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001 -. Grou~ I 163/120/The Vault 163 11/12/1991 91302 Encroachment Permit 91-302 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 11/12/1991 91303 Encroachment Permit 91-303 80205 0051 Film 3821MiAO001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 11/13/1991 91304 Encroachment Permit 91-304 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 11/19/1991 91306 Encroachment Permit 91-306 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 11/21/1991 91307 Encroachment Permit 91-307 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 ~1/22/1991 91308 Encroachment Permit 91-308 80205 0051 Film 3821M1AO001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 1~3 11/25/1991. 91301 Encroachment Permit 91-301 80205 00~1 Film 3821MIA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 11/25/1991 91309 Encroachment Permit 91-309 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001 ~roup I 163/120/The Vault 163 11/25/1991 91311 Encroachment Permit 91-311 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault RRDESTY...RR061 City of Temecula Page 21 11/07/1995 Files Ready for Destruction 09: 05: 05 Doc- Item Ret. File Reference # Storage Media p-'~- Date Ref. Brief Description Code Security Class Storage Location Location Reference 1~ 11/27/1991 91312 Encroachment Permit 91-312 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 12/02/1991 91315 Encroachment Permit 91-315 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 12/04/1991 91316 Encroachment Permit 91-316 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 12/04/1991 91317 Encroachment Permit 91-317 80205 0051 Film 3821MiA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 12/05/1991 91318 Encroachment Permit 91-318 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The VaulU 163 12/10/1991 91320 Encroachment Permit 91-320 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault ...................... T ........................................... 163 12/12/1991 91319 Encroachment Permit 91-319 80205 0051 Film 3821MIAO001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 12/16/1991 91321 Encroachment Permit 91-321 80205 0051 Group I ]~ 12/17/1991 91321 Encroachment Permit 91-321A 80205 0051 Group I Film 3821MIA0001 163/120/The Vault Film 3821M1A0001 163/120/The Vault 163 12/18/1991 91197 Encroachment Permit 91-197 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 12/18/1991 91322 Encroachment Permit 91-322 80205 0051 Film 3821MiA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 12/2021991 91323 Encroachment Permit 91-323 80205 0051 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 12/26/1991 91324 Encroachment Permit 91-324 80205 0051 Film 3821MIA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 373 Records Processed 'RR~ES~Y...R~061 Cit~ of Temeeula Doe, Ref ......... 163 ~age 1 11/07/1995 Files Ready for Destruction Retention Code... 80605 09:30:11 Destruction Date. 11/28/1995 Dec- Item Ret. File Reference # Storage Media Ref. Date Ref. Brief Description Code Security Class Storage Location Location Referend,_ 163 06/25/1984 02708 Conditional Use Case 02708 80605 0055. Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 02/10/1988 23267 Tract 23267-4 80605 0056 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 02/10/1988 23299 Tract 23299 80605 0056 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 02/11/1988 23267 Tract 23267-F 80605 0056 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 08/03/1988 23335 Parcel Merger 23335 80605 0056 Film 3821MiA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 09/25/1988 23103 Tract 23103 80605 0058 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 09/28/1988 23102 Tract 23102 80605 0057 & 0058 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 11/08/1988 23101 Tract 23101 80605 0057 Film 3821MIA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 183 11/09/1988 23101 Tract 23101-2 80605 0057 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 03/20/1989 24187 Tract 24187 80605 0055 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 05/23/1989 24186 Tract 24186 80605 0057 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 05/24/1989 24186 Tract 24186-1 80605 0057 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 05/25/1989 24186 Tract 24186-2 80605 0057 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 05/26/1989 24186 Tract 24186-3 80605 0057 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 05/27/1989 24186 Tract 24186-4 80605 0057 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 1~ 07/12/1988 23125 Tract 23125 80605 0058 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 09/24/1889 24188 Tract 24188 Inf. 80605 0055 Film 3821M1A0001 qroup I 163/120/The Vault 163 09/25/1989 24188 Tract 24188 806050055 Film '3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault RRDESTY...RR061 City of Temecula Page 2 11/07/1995 Files Ready for Destruction 09:30:11 Dec. Item Ret. File Reference # Storage Media -' Date Ref. Brief Description Code Security Class Storage Location Location Reference 16~ 09/26/1989 24185 Tract 24185-1 80605 0057 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 09/26/1989 24187 Tract 24187-1 80605 0055 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 09/26/1989 24188 Tract 24188-1 80605 0055 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The vault 163 09/27/1989 24185 Tract 24185-2 80605 0057 Film 3821MiA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 09/27/1989 24187 Tract 24187-2 80605 0058 Film 3821MIA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 09/27/1989 24188 Tract 24188-2 80605 0055 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 09/28/1989 24185 Tract 24185 80605 0057 Film 3821MiA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 09/28/1989 24188 Tract 24188-3 80605 0055 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault ' 09/29/1989 24188 Tract 24188-4 80605 0055 Film 3821MIJ~0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 09/30/1989 24188 Tract 24188-5 80605 0055 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 05/20/1990 03042 Conditional Use Permit 03042 80605 0055 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 07/03/1990 23371 Tract 23371 80605 0056 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 09/17/1990 03036 Conditional Use Case 03036 80605 0055 Film 3821MiA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 12/18/1990 03076 Conditional Use Permit 03076 80605 0055 & 0056 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 01/30/1991 03334 Tract 03334 80605 0056 Film 3821M1A0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 16~ 07/15/1991 91004 Public Works 91-004 80605 0056 Film 3821MIA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 163 09/27/1991 94019 Public Works 94o019 80605 0056 Film 3821MiA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 12/05/1991 92009 Public Works 92-009 80605 0056 Film 3821MiA0001 Group I 163/120/The Vault RRDESTY...RR061 City of Temecula Page 3 11/07/1995 Files Ready for Destruction 09:30:11 Doc. Item Ret. File Reference # Storage Media Ref. Date Ref. Brief Description Code Security Class Storage Locatlon Location Refere +' 163 12/12/1991 91003 Pttblic Works 91-003 80605 0056 Film 3821MIAO001 Group I 163/120/~e Vault 163 02/14/1992 23100 Tract 23100-3 80605 0057 Film 3821MIAO001 Group I 163/120/The Vault 38 Records Processed rI'EM 5 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL~~ CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Genie Roberrs, Director of Finance November 28, 1995 City Treasurer's Report as of September 30, 1995 PREPARED BY: Steve Oakley, Accountant RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive and file the City Treasurer's Report as of September 30, 1995. DISCUSSION: Reports to the City Council regarding the City's investment portfolio and receipts, disbursements and fund balance are required by Government Code Sections 53646 and 41004 respectively. The City's investment portfolio is in compliance with the Code Sections as of September 30, 1995. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: 1. City Treasurer's Report as of September 30, 1995 2. Schedule of Assets, Liabilities, and Fund Equity as of September 30, 1995 City of Temecula City Treasurer's Report As of September 30, 1995 Cash Activity for the Month of September: Cash and Investments as of September 1, 1995 $ Cash Receipts Cash Disbursements Cash and Investments as of September 30, 1995 $ 54,933,278 1,988,295 (1,936,657) 54,984,916 Cash and Investments Portfolio: Type of Investment Institution Yield Balance Petty Cash General Checking Benefit Demand Deposits Local Agency Investment Fund Deferred Compensation Fund Deferred Compensation Fund Defined Contribution Fund Trust Accounts-TCSD COPs Reserve Account-TCSD COPs Trust Accounts-RDA Bonds Construction Fund-RDA Bonds Reserve Account-RDA Bonds City Hall First Interstate First Interstate State Treasurer 5.832 ICMA PEBSCO PEBSCO Bank of America 5.434 BofA - Bayerische Landesbank 6.870 Bank of America 5.434 BofA - Bayerische Landesbank 6.210 BofA - Bayerische Landesbank 7.400 800 (19,738) 3,712 40,395,328 273.833 396 567 27 125 351 016 502 690 718 663 1 O, 886, 000 1,448 920 54,984,916 (1) (1) (1)-This amount is net of outstanding checks. Per Government Code Requirements, this Treasurer's Report is in compliance with the City of Temecula's investment policy and there are adequate funds available to meet budgeted and actual expenditures of the City of Temecula for the next thirty days. City of Temecula Schedule of Assets, Liabilities, and Fund Balances As of September 30, 1995 Assets: Cash and investments Receivables Due from other funds Land held for resale Fixed assets-net Total assets Community Services Redevelopment City (1) District Agency Total $ 32,972,497 $ 2,187,677 $ 19,824,742 $ 54,984,916 2,983,497 122,300 202,076 3,307,873 551,944 551,944 918,171 2,103,053 3,021,224 424,895 424,895 $ 37,851,004 $ 2,309,977 $ 22,129,871 $ 62,290,852 Liabilities and fund equity: Liabilities: Due to other funds $ 519,144 Other liabilities 6,036,550 $ Total liabilities $ 32,800 $ 167,843 89,272 6,555,694 167,843 122,072 Fund equity: Contributed capital 1,055,344 Retained earnings 144,920 Fund balances: Reserved (2) 3,746,559 Designated (3) 18,267,056 Undesignated 8,081,431 Total fund equity 31,295,310 $ 37,851,004 $ Total liabilities and fund equity 989,272 6,576,522 1,152,862 15,431,277 2,142,134 22,007,799 2,309,977 $ 22,129,871 551,944 6,293,665 6,845,609 1,055,344 144,920 11,312,353 34,851,195 8,081,431 55,445,243 62,290,852 (1) includes General Fund, CIP Fund, Gas Tax Fund, other special revenue funds, and deferred comp agency funds, (2) Includes amounts' reserved for encumbrances, land held for resale, long-term notes receivable, low/rood housing, and debt Service. (3) Includes amounts designated for economic uncertainty, debt service, and continuing appropriations. rI'EM 6 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE DIREC CITY MANAGE TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT. City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Interim Director of Public Works/City Engineer November 28, 1995 Parcel Map No. 28223 (located north of Winchester Road and west of Diaz Road) PREPARED BY: _J~/Steven Cresswell, Principal Engineer (~Annie Bostre-Le, Assistant Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve Parcel Map No. 28223, subject to the Conditions of Approval. BACKGROUND: Tentative Parcel Map No. 28223 was approved by the Planning Director of the City of Temecula on August 7, 1995. The Developer has met all of the applicable Conditions of Approval. This parcel map is a portion of a previous subdivision, Parcel Map No. 21383. Parcel Map No. 28223 resubdivides Parcels 101 to 112 to create one (1) 12.1 acre parcel. The property is located north of Winchester Road and west of Diaz Road. The applicant is the John W. Hoffee II. The following fees have been paid for Parcel Map No. 28223: Stephen's K-Rat Fee Public Facilities Deposit Signal Mitigation Fee Flood Control Fee $23,595.00 ~10,000.00 ~21,175.00 ~23,660.00 The following fees have been deferred for Parcel Map No. 28223: Fire Mitigation Fee Due prior to Building Permit Improvements were constructed with the underlying Parcel Map No. 21383, therefore no bonds are required for Parcel Map No. 28223. · -1- r:\agdrpt\95\l 128~prn28223 FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: 2. 3. 4. Development Fee Checklist Location Map Copy of Sheet I of Parcel Map 28223 Fees and Securities Report -2- r:~agdrpt~95~l 128~pm28223 CITY OF TEMECULA DEVELOPMENT FEE CHECKLIST Final Parcel Man No. 28223 The following fees were reviewed by Staff relative to their applicability to this project. Fee . Habitat Conservation Plan (K-Rat) Parks and Recreation (Quimby Fees) Traffic Signal Mitigation Public Facility Fire Mitigation Flood Control (ADP) Condition of Approval Condition No. 6 N/A Condition No. 31 Condition No. 56 See Fire Department Letter dated 5/19/95 Condition No. 42 -3- r:~agdrpt\95~1128\pm28223 VIClNITY I~IA P OWNE3rS STATENENT ~ CONS~NII~ NOI'E OJ~/E TrAELE* / PARCEL / /<\ · \ \ \ C,~'Y BVOl',t2R'~ $TA1~agC CITY OF TEMECULA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT PARCEL MAP NO. 28223 DATE: November 14, 1995 IMPROVEMENTS FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE MATERIAL & LABOR SECURITY SECURITY Street and Drainage $ 0 $ 0 ' Water 0 0 Sewer 0 0 TOTAL $ 0 $ 0 Improvements were constructed with the underlying Parcel Map No. 21383, therefore no bonds are required for Parcel Map No. 28223. DEVELOPMENT FEES City Traffic Signing and Striping Costs RCFCD Drainage Fee Fire Mitigation Fee - Signal Mitigation Fee - Road and Bridge Benefit Fee Other Development Fees N/A Paid T.B.D.* Paid N/A T.B.D* SERVICE FEES Planning Fee Comprehensive Transportation Plan Plan Check Fee Inspection Fee Monument Inspection Fee Letter of Map Revision (LOMR Review) Fees Paid to Date Balance of Fees Due *T.B.D. - To be determined 55.00 4.00 770.00 N/A N/A N/A 829.00 0.00 -4- r:\agdrpt\95~l 128\pm28223 ITEM 7 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer November 28, 1995 Completion and Acceptance of the Parkview Site Rough Improvements, Project No. PW93-09 Grading PREPARED BY:(~ Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects Jim D. Faul, Assistant Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council accept the Parkview Site Rough Grading Improvements, Project No. PW93o09, as complete and direct the City Clerk to: File the Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a one (1) year Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract, and Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after the filing of the Notice of Completion if no liens have been filed. BACKGROUND: On August 8, 1995, the City Council awarded a contract for the Parkview Site Rough Grading Improvements, Project No. PW93-09, to Kunze, Inc. for $277,018.00. The project included rough grading of the site, rough grading for the widening of Pauba Road, construction of drainage ditches and a desilting basin, and hydroseeding. There was also some overexcavation of the canyon areas to remove loose and uncompacted material. The Contractor has completed the work in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and within the allotted contract time to the satisfaction of the City Engineer· The construction retention for this project will be released on or about thirty-five (35) days after the Notice of Completion has been recorded. r:~agdtpt\9:~\1128~pw93-Og.acc FISCAL IMPACT: The .contract amount for this project was $277,018.00 with a contingency amount of 27,701.80. The total contract amount of the project decreased by $5,448.50 due to a reduction in the actual quantities of the unclassified excavation, canyon subdrain, and hydroseeding. The Contract Change Orders were for the unforeseen additional removals of overexcavated material encountered in the canyon areas and were beyond the scope of work of the awarded contract. Contract Change Order No's. I and 2 were approved by the City Manager in a total amount of $27,699.00. Contract Change Order No. 3 was approved by the City Council on September 26, 1995 in the amount of $12,000.00. The total contract cost was $311,268.50. This project is a Capital Improvement Project and was funded by an operating transfer from the General Fund. Attachments: 1. Notice of Completion 2. Maintenance Bond 3. Contractor's Affidavit r: ~agdrpt\95 ~ 1128~pw93-09 RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND RETURN TO: CiTY CLERK CITY OF TEMECULA 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE NOTICE OF COMPLETION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT: 1. The City of Temecula is the owner of the property hereinafter described. 2. The full address of the City of Temecula is 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California 92590. 3. A Contract was awarded by the City of Temecula to Kunze, Inc. to perform the following work of improvement: PW93-09 Parkview Site Rough Grading Improvements 4. Said work was completed by said company according to plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works of the City of Temecula and that said work was accepted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on November 28, 1995. That upon said contract the TIG Premier Insurance Company was surety for the bond given by the said company as required by law. 5. The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, and is described as follows: PROJECT PW93-09. 6. The street address of said property is: the northerly side of Pauba Road between La Primavera Street and Showalter Road, CITY OF TEMECULA. Dated at Temecula, California, this _ day of · 1995. STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) CITY OF TEMECULA ) SS JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California and do hereby certify under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing NOTICE OF COMPLETION is true and correct, and that said NOTICE OF COMPLETION was duly and regularly ordered to be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder of Riverside by said City Council. Dated at Temecula, California, this day of ,1995. JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk r:~cip~projects\pw93\pw93-O9,\completn.not Bond No. TPI 03890099 CITY OF TEMECULA. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MAINTENANCE BOND pROJECT NO. PW93-09 PARKVIEW SITE ROUGH GRADING IMPROVEMENTS RECEIV" NOV O 9 lr"35 :' CITY OF TEMEC:, !. ~ ENGINEERtNG DEPAR'~ i,,;:r,~i KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRF..SENTS THAT: Kunze, Inc. 17480 La Sierra Avenue, ._Riverside, CA 9250.3 N~ME AND ADDRESS OF CONTtMCTOR a Corporation , hereinafter called Principal, and ' (fiTI i~ whether a Corporalion, parmarshtp or lnO1vMudl TIG Premier Insurance Company, 70 W. Michigan, _B.attle 'Cre. ek, MI 490ib__~ - NAME AND ADDRESS 01; SURETY hereinefter called SURETY, ere held end firmly bound unto CITY OF TEMECULA, herelrmftercalledOWNER,jfithePefialsumof Thirty One Thousand One Hundred Twenty I~LI~R$ lid 00 Seven and 00(100ths ........... CENTS 14 31,127.00 . _ ) in lawful money of the United States, said sum being not. le~s than ten percent (10%)' at the Contract value payable by the said City of TameGala under the terms o1 the Contract, for the payment of which, 'we bind ourselveS. successors end assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these pre~ente. THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION is such that whereas, the Principal entered into a certain Contract with the OWNER, dated the 8th day of August .19 9_5_. · copy of which i~ heralD attached and made a part hereof ~or the construction 0f pROJECT NO. PW93-O9 PARKVIEW SITE ROUGH GRADING IMPROVEMENTS. WHEREAS, ~eid Contract provides that the Principal will furnish a bond conditioned to guarantee for the period of ~ year after approval of the final estimate on said job, by the OWNER, against ell detects in wort<manship and materials which may become apparent during said period; and WHEREAS, the said Contract has been completed, and was epproved on October 26 , 19 9,_~,5. NOW, THEREFORE. THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION lS SUCH, that if within one year from the date of approve! of the said Contract. the work done under the terms of said Contract shell disease poor workmanship in the execution Of said work, and the carrying out of the terms of said Contract, or it shell appear that defective materials were furnished thereunder, then this obligation shall remain In full force and virtue, otherwise this instrument shall be void, MAINTENANCE BOND M-I ----. Signed and seeled this 27t..__b_h day of _.. October ,1995__- (Seal) TIC Premier Insurance Company Attorne¥-in_-Fac t {Title} APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter M. Thorton, City Attorney By: {Name) (Title) MAINTENANCE BOND M-Z CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT No. 59~7 State of cm,~ County of RIVERSIDE On - NOVEv~ER 2, 1995 DATE personally appeared [] personally known to me -:01'1 before me, SANDY FRLT,y, NOTARY PUBLIC NAME, TITLE OF OFFICER - E.G., 'JANE DOE, NOTARY PUBLIC* NAME(S) OF SIGNER(S) [] proved to mc on tho baP.,ic of cat~faetory ovidonoo to be the person(~ whose nameCl<) is/are- subscribed to the within instrument and ac- knowledged to me that he/ohc,/thcy executed the same in his/hor/thcir authorized capacity(-L-,s)-, and that by his/hcr/thcir signature(~ on the instrument the person(~, or the entity upon behalf of which the person(~ acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. SIGNATL~E OF NOTARY OPTIONAL Though the data below is not required by law,. it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form. CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER [] INDIVIDUAL' [] 'CORPORATE OFFICER PP, ESTD:EIfr Trrus(s) [] PARTNER(S) [] LIMITED [] GENERAL [] ATTORNEY-IN-FACT [] TRUSTEE(S) [] GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR [] OTHER: DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT TWO NUMBER OF PAGES 10/27/95 DATE OF DOCUMENT SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITY(IES) KUNZE INC A'ITORNE"/-IN-FACT SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE C1993 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION · 8236 Remmet Ave., P.O. Box 7184 · Canoga Park, CA 91309-7184 CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of_ California County of On October 27, 1995 personally appeared [~l personally known to me - OR - [] proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and ac- knowledged to me that he/she/they executed ' ~c~,'%~ ~ ' "' ~,~2",'¢~ ""~" '" = WITNESS my hand and offidal seal. -" ~ OPTIONAL I ThOugh the data below Is not required by law, tt may prove valueDie to persons relying on the dct, ument and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form, CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER [] INDIVIDUAL [] CORPORATE OFFICER [] PARTNER(S) [] UMITED [] GENERAL ~ ATTORNEY-IN-FACT E3 TRUSTEE(S) [] GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR [] OTHER: DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT Maintenance Bond TITLE OR TYPE OF DOOUMENT Two NUMBER OF PAGES 10/27/95 DATE OF DOCUMENT 993 NATIONAl, NOTARY AEr~)CIATION, 823e Reinmet A~I. P.O, Box ? 184 * Oanogl ~--p& P~e~ Of Atrophy v81 $~ only ~e n~e~ ~n ~e~: KnOw All Men by ~e Present, ~ ~G Premier I~mce Compcy, a =o~ormi~ duly orpn~zed and existing under ~ awe of ~ See of ~lif~n~, md ~ng i~ aminis~/tive office in Baffle Creek, ~lhom Co~, Michi~, does by ~ese presen~ ~e. cottage md ~poim RANDALL R. SPOHN of ANAHEIN and State of CAT.TFORNTA its true and lawful Attorney(s)-in-Fact, with full power and authority hereby conferred in its name. place and stead. to execute, acknowled and deliver CONTRACT ~ONDS GUARANTEE (S.B.A. AGKEEMENT) - HAXII~U~ PENALTY $1,000,000.00 OTIiER CONTRACT BONDS - NAXIffiJH PENALTY $175,000.00 ALL OTHER BONDS - HAXIN1.~I PENALTY $25,000.00 "THIS POKER OF ATTORNEY SHALL TEP, HINATE AND BE OF NO FURTHER EFFECT AFTER DECEMBER 31, 1995" and to bind the Cornpiny ~erlby Is fully and to the me extent Is if such bonds were signed by the President, lealed with the torporIts sIN of the Conq}any and duly attested by its Secretary, hereby ratifying and confirming Ill that the Mid Attorney(s)-in-Psct ely do in the premise~ Said ap ointment is rnlde under and b authority of Section 35 of the bylaws, Is Iraended, and duly adopted ~y the Board of Directors o the YrlG Premier Insurance Company. f "Be It Resolved, that the President, any Vice-President any Secretmy or any-Assistant Secretary 'ihall be and is hereby vested with full power and author' to point any or more suitable persons as Attorney(s)- in-Fact to represent and act for and on behalf ;r~f ~e ~oFmpany subject to the following provisions: "Section 1. Attorney-in-Fact Attorney-in-Fact rnly be given full power and authority for and in the name of and on behalf of the Company, to execute, acknowledge and deliver, any and all bonds· recognizances, contracts, agreements of m, consents of surety and other conditional or obligatory undertakings and Iny and all notices and documents canoeling or terminating the Company's lilbility thereunder, and any such instruments so executed by Iny such Attorney-in-Fact eMIl be binding upon the Company as if signed by the President and. sealed and attested by the Corporate Secretary." in Witness Whereof, TIG Premier Insurance Company has caused these presents to be signed by its and its corporate seal to be hereto ·AD., 19 94 · in fie year 1994 · a notary public, personalIt; , personally known to me to be fie person who executed fie within instrument as VICE PRESIDENT on behalf of fie corporation therein named and ackn uted it ~ANCY I. RAYMOND I Notary Public I, fie undersigned Secretary of TIG Premier Insurance Company hereby certify that the above end foregoing is a full· true and correct co y of fie Original Power of Attorney issued by said Company, and do hereby f~ certify that the Mid ~oYwer of Attorney is still in force and effect And I do hereby further certify thlt fie Certification of this Power of Attorney is signed and sealed by facsimile under and ob~/the authority of Section 30 of the bylaws. as amended. and duty ,doEted by the Board of Directors the TIG Premier Insurance Company and that said Section 30 of said ylaws has not Dean ended or repealed as of the date hereof; "Resolved, tit fie signature of the Secretary or any Assistant Secretary of this Corporation, and the seal of fie Corporation, may be affixed or printed by facsimile to any certificate to a Power of Attorney of this Corporation, and that such printed fitsimile signature and seal shall be valid and binding upon this Corporation" GIVEN under my hand and the seal of said Company, this 27th 19 95 THIS POWER OF ATTORNEY EFFECTIVE ONLY IF ATTACHED TO BOND NO. TPI 03890099 day of SlcPltlry October 30024 C 01-94 CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CONTRACTOR'$ AFRDAVIT AND RNAL RELEASE PROJECT NO. PW93-09 PARKVIEW SITE ROUGH GRADING IMPROVEMENTS This is to certify that ~z~. ]~;C , (hereinafter the "CONTRACTOR") declares to the City of Temecula, under oath, that he/it has paid in full for all materials, supplies, labor, services, tools, equipment, and all other bills contracted for by the CONTRACTOR or by any of the CONTRACTOR's agents, employees or subcontractors used or in contribution to the execution of it's contract with the City of Temecula, with regard to the building, erection, construction, or repair of that certain work of improvement known as PROJECT NO. PW93-09 situated in the City of Temecula, State of California, more particularly described as follows: PARKVIEW SITE ROUGH GRADING IMPROVEMENTS The CONTRACTOR declares that it knows of no unpaid debts or claims arising out of said Contract which would constitute grounds for any third party to claim a stop notice against of any unpaid sums owing to the CONTRACTOR. Further, in connection with the final payment of the Contract, the CONTRACTOR hereby disputes the following amounts: Description Dollar Amount to Dispute Pursuant to Public Contracts Code § 7200, the CONTRACTOR does hereby fully release and acquit the City of Temecula and all agents and employees of the City, and each of them, from any and all claims, debts, demands, or cause of action which exist or might exist in favor of the CONTRACTOR by reason of payment by the City of Temecula of any contact amount which the CONTRACTOR has not disputed above. Dated: N~: 1995 CONTRACTOR By:- ~ ~ Signature ]~ Kf.~zR / Print Name end Title RELEASE R-1 ITEM 8 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer November 28, 1995 Substitute Agreement and Bonds for Traffic Signalization Mitigation Fees in Parcel Maps No. 23561-1 and 23561-2. (E/o Jefferson Avenue N/o Santa Gertrudis Creek) PREPARED BY:/~. Steven Cresswell, Principal Engineer 7~Albert Crisp, Permit Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council ACCEPT the substitute agreement and bond for Traffic Signal Mitigation Fees in Parcel Maps No. 23561-1 and 23561-2, AUTHORIZE the release of the Traffic Signal Mitigation Fee bond on file, and DIRECT the City Clerk to so notify the developers and sureties. BACKGROUND: The County of Riverside approved Parcel Map No. 23561-1 on June 13, 1989, and the City Council approved Parcel Map No. 23561-2 on December 4, 1990. As a condition of the approval of these maps, an agreement to assure the payment of' Traffic Signalization Mitigation fees was executed for each development. Where securities are posted in accordance with the agreements, these securities are generally held in full until all of the parcel owner/developers have paid the pertinent traffic signalization mitigation fees. This may require several years to accomplish in industrial park developments where a number of builders may develop on but one parcel of many in the overall development. Bedford Development Co. did not post a Traffic Signal Mitigation bond with the County for Parcel Map No. 23561-1, but did post a bond with the City for Parcel Map No. 23561-2 as follows: Bond No. 3S 743 459 00 in the amoun~ of $62,072.50 with Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. as surety. - 1 - r:~agdrpt\95~, 1128~TRAFSIGM .FEE Bedford Development Company (Now Kemper Real Estate Management Co.) has sold their remaining parcels in these developments and in accord with their sales agreement and the City Attorney's direction to replace both the agreements and securities, the following buyer has posted the security to cover those parcels for which no traffic signal mitigation have been paid in the two phases: North Jefferson Properties, Partnership (Comprised of Hoff Investments, Limited Partner, and PMD Investments, Limited Partner) 25792 Obrero Road Mission Viejo, CA 92691-9125 and the American Motorists Insurance Company as surety posted the following bond: Bond No. 3SM 806 937 00 in the amount of $57,400.00 Staff recommends that the City Council accept in substitution both the agreement and bond as submitted and authorize the release of the bond on file for Parcel Map No. 23561-2. All other contractual obligations for public improvements have been completed and the warranty, labor and materials, and subdivision monument bonds for both phases have been released by City Council action. The several public streets have been accepted into the City Maintained-Street System by Resolution No. 95-34. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: 1. Location Map · 2. Substitute Agreement (On file) 3. Substitute Bond (On file) -2- r:~agdzpt\95~1128~TRAFSIGM.FEE // .." . //// ~ ' t.. /// // .-. · "' .. c-p,.o F-i. ivl.'N O.J~.gE,'r32-2 P.M. J '47./3 - ,e PARCEL MAPS NO. 23561-1 & 23561-2 Location Map ITEM 9 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer November 28, 1995 Release Faithful Performance Warranty, Labor and Material, and Monument Bonds in Tract No. 22715-1. (Southwesterly of intersection of Rancho California Road at Butterfield Stage Road) PREPARED BY: ~ Steven Cresswell, Principal Engineer ~ Albert Crisp, Permit Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council AUTHORIZE the release of Faithful Performance Warranty and Labor and Material bonds for Street, Drainage, and Water and Sewer improvements, and the Subdivision Monumentation Bond, in Tract. No. 22715-1, and DIRECT the City Clerk to so advise the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, the Developer, and .the Surety.. BACKGROUND: On August 1, 1989, the Riverside County Board of Supervisors entered into subdivision agreements with: Tayco (Joint Venture of Taylor Woodrow Homes & Cosrain Homes, Inc.) 4921 Birch Street, Suite 110 Newport Beach, CA.92660 for the improvement of streets and drainage, installation of sewer and water systems, and subdivision monumentation. Accompanying the subdivision agreements were surety bonds issued by American Home Assurance Company as follows: Bond No. PB300 11 131 in the amount of $1,104,000to cover street/drainage improvements. 2. Bond No. PB300 11 131 in the amount of $32,000to cover water improvements. 3. Bond No. PB300 11 131 in the amount of $26,000to cover sewer improvements. Bond No. PB300 11 131 in the amount of $581,000to cover material and labor for street, water, and sewer improvements.- r: ~agd~t~95\ 1128\tr227151 .r~l Bond No. PB300 11 132 in the amount of $9,000 to cover subdivision monumentation. Effective December 31, 1993, Cosrain Homes Inc. withdrew from the joint venture partnership. The name of the new partnership is TAYCO, a California General Partnership (comprised of Taylor Woodrow Homes California Limited, a California Corporation, and Taylor Woodrow Real Estate, a California Corporation). A new agreement was executed by the partnership and riders to the Bonds, changing the obligee from the County to the City, the .Principal from Tayco to TAYCO, and reducing the Faithful Performance bond amounts, have been submitted for City Council acceptance. On July 12, 1994, the City Council accepted the public improvements, initiated the one- year warranty period, and authorized the reduction in faithful performance bond to the following warranty amount: Streets/Drainage, Water and Sewer: Bond No. PB 300 11 131 $116,200 Public Works Staff has reviewed the project end all necessary repairs/replacements have been satisfactorily completed. The Public Works Department therefore recommends that the Faithful Performance warranty bond be released. The developer is also required to post Labor and Material bonds to ensure payment to suppliers and workers. These bonds are maintained in effect for a period of time determined by the Subdivision Improvement Agreement after the City Council has accepted the public improvements. The contractual six-month claim period has run and no claims have been filed with the City. Therefore Staff recommends that the following Labor and Material Bond posted by American Home Assurance Co. be released: Bond No. PB300 11 131 in the amount of $581,000 The inspection and verification process relating to the survey monumentation has been completed by the City staff, and the Department of Public Works recommends the release of the Subdivision Monumentation Bond. Therefore it is appropriate to exonerate this bond · as follows: Bond No. PB300 11 132 in the amount of $9,000. The affected streets are a portion of Butterfield Stage Road, Rancho California Road, and Calle Resaca. These streets were accepted into the City Maintained-Street System by Resolution 94-82. FISCAL IMPACT: None by this action. These streets have been integrated into the City;s Pavement Management System and will receive periodic surface and/or structural maintenance efforts. The new pavement condition of these streets should necessitate only limited surface or structural treatments for 5 to 8 years. Attachment: Location Map r:~agdq~t\95\1128\tr227151 .r¢l NoT: TRACT NO. 22715-1 Location Map I'I'EM 10 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE DIRECTOR CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works\City Engineer November 28, 1995 Award of Contract for the Walcott Corridor, Project PW94-10 PREPARED BY: Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects Scott Harvey, Associate Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: Award a contract for the construction of the Walcott Corridor, Project PW94-10 to Hemet Manufacturing Company, Inc. dba Genesis Construction for $1,716,637.50and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract. Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $171,663.75which is equal to 10% of the contract amount. Adopt a Negative Declaration and approve a Mitigation Monitoring Program for the Walcott Corridor Project. - BACKGROUND: The City Council approved the construction plans and specifications, and authorized the · Department of Public Works to solicit public construction bids for the Walcott Corridor Project, PW94-'10. This project will provide an all weather surface road (two travel lanes) from Nicolas Road to La Serena Way by way of Calle Girasol, Calle Chapos, and Walcott Road. The existing grades of all the streets throughout the project will be raised and lowered to construct a smooth road alignment. The proposed new grades will require Rancho California Water District to relocate their existing water main in Walcott Lane and Calle Chapos. The cost for the relocation will be reimbursed to the City by R.C.W.D. The bid also includes an alternative bid to refurbish the existing 30" water main instead of installing an entirely new main line. The engineer's estimate for the street improvements and water main relocation is $1,583,000 and $837,000, respectively. This brings the total estimated project .cost to $2,420,000. Staff has complete the Initial Environmental Study (IES) and pursuant to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); it has been determined that this project as proposed, revised or mitigated will not have a s!gnificant impact upon the environment. As a result, it is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Negative Declaration and approve a Mitigation Monitoring Program for this project. Eleven (11 ) bids for the project were · publicly opened on August 24, 1995 and the results for the base bid are as follows: pwO4~agdrpfi95~1128\pw94-10.awd Base Bid 1. Hemet Manufacturing Company, Inc. dba Genesis Construction ................. $1,716,637.50 2. Utah Pacific Construction, Company ......... $1,905,175.00 3. TNT Grading Inc ....................... $1,905,523.43 4. Paul Hubbs Construction Co., Inc ............ $1,927,655.70 5. C.A. Rasmussen, Inc .................... $1,955,190.70 6. Greg J. Harris Construction ............... $1,963,896.80 7. American COntracting, Inc ................ $1,972,284.15 8. Highgrade Engineering, Inc'. ............... $1,985,715.25 9. Commercial Contractors, Inc. dba. Commercial Contractors Western Division., Inc.. $2,124,435.81 10. Vance Corporation ..................... $2,268,778.29 11. J. R. Pipeline Co., Inc .................... $2,389,004.25 The bid results were reviewed with Rancho California Water District and it is recommended that the least costly option of installing new pipe be awarded. The total cost of the water facilities is $647,453.00 and is included in the base bid shown above for Genesis Construction. Staff reviewed the bid proposal from Hemet Manufacturing Company, Inc. dba Genesis Construction and found that the proposal was complete and in order. Hemet Manufacturing Company, Inc. dba Genesis Construction has not performed any work for the City, but has performed well in other areas of Riverside County based on comments from references of previous work. A copy of the bid summary is available for review in the City Engineer's office. FISCAL IM'PACT: This is a Capital Improvement Project and will be funded by Measure A and Development Impact Fees. The water main improvements will be paid for by R.C.W.D. Funds are available for the construction contract of $1,716,637.50 and the contingency of $171,663.75 for a total of construction cost of $1,888,301.25. R.C.W.D. will reimburse the City $647,453.00. Attachment: Hemet Manufacturing Company, Inc. dba Genesis Construction Contract Notice of Proposed Negative Declaration _ Mitigation Monitoring Program pwO4%agdq~t\95%1128\pw94-10.awd CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CONTRACT FOR PROJECT NO. PW94.- 10 WAL CO TT CORRIDOR THIS CONTRACT, made and entered into the 28th day of November, 1995, by and between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CITY", and Hernet Manufacturing Company, Inc. dbe Genesis Conai~dction, hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR." WITNESSETH: That CITY and CONTRACTOR, for the consideration hereinafter named, mutually agree as follows: 1.8. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The complete Contract includes all of the Contract Documents, to wit: Notice Inviting Bids, Instructions to Bidders, Proposal, Performance Bond, Labor and Materials Bond, Plans and Specifications entitled PROJECT NO. PW94-10 WALCOTT CORRIDOR, Insurance Forms, this Contract, and all modifications and amendments thereto, the State of California Department of Transportation Standard Specifications (1992 Ed.) where' specifically referenced in the Plans and Technical Specifications, and the latest version of the Standard Soecifications for Public Works Construction, including all supplements as written and promulgated by the Joint Cooperative Committee of the Southern California Chapter of the American Associated General Contractors of California (hereinafter, "Standard Specifications") as amended by the General Specifications, Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications for PROJECT NO. PW94-10 WALCOTT CORRIDOR. Copies of these Standard Specifications are available from the publisher: Building News, Incorporated 3055 Overland Avenue Los Angeles, California 90034 (213) 202-7775 The Standard Specifications will COntrOl the general provisions, construction materials, and construction methods for this Contract except as amended by the General, Specifications, Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications for PROJECT NO. PW94-10 WALCOTT CORRIDOR. In case of conflict between the Standard Specifications and the other Contract Documents, the other Contract Documents shall take precedence over and be used in lieu of such conflicting portions. Where the Contract Document describe portions of_the work in general terms, but not in complete detail, it is understood that the item is to be furnished and installed completed and in place and that only the best general practice is to be used. Unless otherwise specified, the CONTRACTOR shall furnish all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and incidentals, and do all the work involved in executing the Contract. CONTRACT CA-1 r:\cip\projects%pw94-10\contract The Contract Documents are complementary, and what is called for by anyone shall be as binding as if called for by all. Any conflict between this Contract and any other Contract Document shall be resolved in favor of this Contract. SCOPE OF WORK. CONTRACTOR shall perform everything required to be performed, shall provide and furnish all the labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable equipment, and all utility and transportation services required for the following: PROJECT NO. PW94-10 WALCOTT CORRIDOR All of said work to be performed and materials to be furnished shall be in strict accordance with the Drawings and Specifications and the provisions of the Contract Documents hereinabove enumerated and adopted by CITY. CITY APPROVAL. All labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services shall be furnished and work performed and completed under the direction and supervision and subject to the approval of CITY or its authorized representatives. CONTRACT AMOUNT AND SCHEDULE. CITY agrees to pay and CONTRACTOR agrees to accept in full payment for the work above-agreed to be done, the sum of: ONE MILLION SEVEN HUNDRED SIXTEEN THOUSAND SIX HUNDRED THIRTY-SEVEN DOLLARS and FIFTY CENTS ($1,716,637.50),the total amount of the base bid. CONTRACTOR agrees to complete the work in a period not to exceed one hundred & eighty (180) working days, commencing. with delivery of Notice to Proceed by CITY. Construction shall not commence until bonds and insurance are approved by CITY. CHANGE ORDERS. All change orders shall be approved by the City Council, except that the City Manager is hereby authorized by the City Council to make, by written order, changes or additions to the work in an amount not to exceed the contingency as established by the City Council. 6. PAYMENTS. · UNIT PRICE BID SCHEDULE: · Pursuant to Section 20104.50 of the Public Contracts Code, within thirty (30) days after submission of a payment request to the City, the CONTRACTOR shall be paid a sum equal to ninety percent (90%) of the value of the work completed according to the bid schedule. Payment request forms shall be submitted on or about the thirtieth (30th) day of each successive month as the work progresses. The final payment, if unencumbered, or any part thereof unencumbered, shall be made sixty (60) days after acceptance of final payment and the CONTRACTOR filing a one-year Warranty and an Affidavit of Final Release with the CITY on forms provided by the CITY. Payments shall be made on demands drawn in the manner required by law, accompanied by a certificate signed by the City Manager, stating that the work for which payment is demanded has been performed in accordance with the terms of the Contract, and that the amount stated in the certificate is due under the terms of the Contract. Partial payments on the Contract price shall not be considered as an acceptance of any part of the work. CONTRACT CA-2 r:~cip\projects\pw94-10\contrect Interest shall be paid on all undisputed payment requests not paid within 30 days pursuant to Public Contracts Code Section 20104.50. Public Contracts Code Section 7107 is hereby incorporated by reference. WARRANTY RETENTION. Commencing with the date the Notice of Completion is recorded, the CITY shall retain a portion of the Contract award price, to assure warranty performance and correction of construction deficiencies according to the.following schedule: CONTRACT AMOUNT 925,000-975,000 975,000-9500,000 Over 9500,000 RETENTION PERIOD 180 days 180 days One Year RETENTION PERCENTAGE 3% 92,250 + 2% of amount in excess of $75,000 910,750 + 1% of amount in excess of 9500,000 e LIQUIDATED DAMAGES: EXTENSION OF TIME. In accordance with Government Code Section 53069.85, CONTRACTOR agrees to forfeit and pay to CITY the sum of One Thousand Dollars (91,000.00) per day for each calendar day completion is delayed beyond the time allowed pursuant to Paragraph 4 of this Contract. Such sum shall be deducted from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. Such sum shall be deducted from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR will be granted an extension of time and will not be assessed liquidated damages for unforeseeable delays beyond the control of and without the fault or negligence of the CONTRACTOR including delays caused by CITY. CONTRACTOR is required to promptly notify CITY of any such delay. WAIVER OF CLAIMS. On or before making each request for payment under Paragraph 6 above, CONTRACTOR shall submit to CITY, in writing, all claims for compensation as to work related to the payment. Unless the CONTRACTOR has disputed the amount of the payment, the acceptance by CONTRACTOR of each payment shall constitute a release of all claims against the CITY related to the payment. CONTRACTOR shall be required to execute an affidavit, release and indemnity agreement with each claim for payment. 10. PREVAILING WAGES. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Contract, from the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations. These rates are on file with the City Clerk. Copies may be obtained at cost at the City Clerk's office of Temecula. CONTRACTOR shall post a copy of such wage rates at the job site and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum. CONTRACTOR shall comply with the provisions of Sections 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code. Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, CONTRACTOR shall forfeit to the CITY, as a penalty, the sum of $25.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any work done under this Contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of CONTRACT CA-3 r:\cip\projects~pw94-10\contract the Contract. 11. TIME OF THE ESSENCE. Time is of the essence in this contract. 12. INDEMNIFICATION. All work covered by this Contract done at the site of construction or in preparing or delivering materials to the site shall be at the risk of CONTRACTOR alone. CONTRACTOR agrees to save, indemnify, hold harmless and defend CITY, its officers, employees, and agents, against any and all liability, injuries, or death of persons (CONTRACTOR's employees included) and damage to property, arising directly or indirectly out of the obligations herein undertaken or out of the operations conducted by CONTRACTOR, save and except claims or litigations arising through the sole active negligence or sole willful misconduct of the CITY. 13. GRATUITIES. CONTRACTOR warrants that neither it nor any of its employees, agents, or representatives has offered or given any gratuities or promises to CITY's employees, agents, or representatives with a view toward securing this Contract or securing favorable treatment with respect thereto. 14. CONFLICT OF INTEREST. CONTRACTOR warrants that he has no blood or marriage relationship, and that he is not in any way associated with any City officer or employee, or any architect, engineer, or other preparers of the Drawings and Specifications for this project. CONTRACTOR further warrants that no person in his/her employ has been employed by the CITY within one year of the date of the Notice Inviting Bids. 15. CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT. After the completion of the work contemplated by this Contract, CONTRACTOR shall file with the City Manager his affidavit stating that all workmen and persons employed, all firms supplying materials, and all subcontractors upon the Project have been paid in full, and that there are no claims outstanding against the .Project for either labor or materials, except certain items, if any, to be set forth in an 'affidavit covering disputed claims or items in connection with a Stop Notice which has been filed under the provisions of the laws of the State of California. 16. NOTICE TO CITY OF LABOR DISPUTES. Whenever CONTRACTOR has knowledge that any actual or potential labor dispute is delaying or threatens to delay the timely performance of the Contract, CONTRACTOR shall immediately give notice thereof, including all relevant information with respect thereto, to CITY. 17. BOOKS AND RECORDS. CONTRACTOR's books, records, and plans or such part thereof as may be engaged in the performance of this Contract, shall at all reasonable times be subject to inspection and audit by any authorized representative of the CITY. 18. INSPECTION. The work shall be subject to inspection and testing by CITY and its authorized representatives during manufacture and construction and all other times and places, including without limitation, the plans of CONTRACTOR and any of its suppliers. CONTRACTOR shall provide all reasonable facilities and assistance for the safety and convenience of inspectors. All inspections and tests shall be performed in such manner as to not unduly delay the work. The work shall be subject to final inspection and acceptance notwithstanding any payments or other prior inspections. Such final inspection shall be made within a reasonable time after completion of the work. CONTRACT CA-4 r:\cip\projects~pw94-10\contract 19. DISCRIMINATION. CONTRACTOR represents that it has not, and agrees that it will not, discriminate in its employment practices on the basis of race, creed, religion, national origin, color, sex, age, or handicap. 20. GOVERNING LAW. This Contract and any dispute arising hereunder shall be governed by the law of the State of California. 21. WRITTEN NOTICE. Any written notice required to be given in any part of the Contract Documents shall be performed by depositing the same in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid, directed to the address of the CONTRACTOR as set forth in the Contract Documents, and to the CITY addressed as follows: Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590-3606 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Contract to be executed on the date first above written. DATED: CONTRACTOR By: Print or type NAME Print or type TITLE DATED: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY OF TEMECULA By: Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk CONTRACT CA-5 r:\cip\projects~pw94-10~contract City of Temecula Planning Department PROJECT: Notice of Proposed Negative Declaration APPLICANT: Walcott Corridor Street Improvements (PW94-10). City of Temecula Public Works Department. RECEIVEL., AUG 0 9 1,995 C;7'¢ OF ENGINEERING DEPARTIJE.NT LOCATION: .Nicolas Road to Calle Girasol to Calle Chapos to Walcort Road. DESCRIFTION: The construction of a two lane (32 foot wide pavement) road connecting Nicolas Road to La Serena Way. The City of Temecula intends to adopt a Negative Declaration for the project described above. Based upon the information contained in the attached Initial Environmental Study and pursuant to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); it has been determined that this project as proposed, revised or mitigated will not have a significant impact upon the environment. As a result, the City Council intends to adopt a Negative Declaration and approve a Mitigation Monitoring Program for this project on September 12, 1995. The Comment Period for this proposed Negative Declaration is August 14, 1995 to September 5, 1995. Written comments and responses to this notice should be addressed to the contact person listed below at the following address: City of Temecula, 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula, CA 92590. The public notice of the intent to adopt this Negative Declaration is provided through: X The Local Newspaper. X Posting the Site. X Notice to Adjacent Property Owners. If you need 'additional information or have any questions concerning this project, please contact ~'~e and Title) R:\FAGANNI\ENVIRONXXVALCOTT.pND 8~8~95 mf City of Temecula Pl3nning Department Initial Environmental Study I. BACKGROUND INFORMATION 1. Name of Project: 2. Case Numbers: 3. Location of Project: 4. Description of Project: 5. Date of Environmental Assessment: Name of Proponent: Address and Phone Number of Proponent: Walcott Corridor Sweet Improvements PW94-10 Nicolas Road to Calle Girasol to Calle Chapos to Walcott Road The construction of a two lane (32 foot wide pavement) road connecting Nicolas Road to La Serena Way August 4, 1995 City of Temecula Public Works Department 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 (909) 694-6411 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations to all the answers are provided in Section HI) 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes geologic substructures? b, Disruptions, displacements, compaction, or over covering of the soil? c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? d: The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? e, Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? f. Changes in siltation, deposition or erosion? The modification of any wash, channel, creek, river or lake? Yes Maybe No X X X X X X R:\STAFFRP'BWALCOTT.IS 814195 klb 1 Yes Maybe N__o h, Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mudslides, liquefaction, ground failure, or similar hazards? i. Any development within an Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone? Air. Will the proposal result in: a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors? C, Alteration of air movement, temperature, or moisture or any change in climate, whether locally or regionally? Water. Will the proposal result in: a, Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? b, Changes in absorption rates, drainage panems, or the rate and amount of surface runoff?. c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? d. Change in the mount of surface water in any water body? eo Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited w, temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? g, Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions, withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? h, Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding? Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or number of any native species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)? X X X X X X X X X X X R:XSTAFFRPT~WALCOT'F.I$ $14195 klb 2 Yes Maybe N_.9.o b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique; rare, threatened, or endangered species of plants? c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area of native vegetation, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? d. Reduction in the acreage of any agricultural crop? 5. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (animals includes all land animals, birds, reptiles, fish, amphibians, shellfish, benthic organisms, and/or insects)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, threatened, or endangered species of animals? c. The introduction of new wildlife species into an area? d. A barrier to the migration or movement of animals? e. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? 6. Noise. Will the proposal result in: a. Increases in existing noise levels? b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? c. Exposure of people to severe vibrations? 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce or result in light or glare? 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in: a. Alteration of the present land use of an area? b. Alteration to the future planned land use of an area as described in a community or general plan? 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a. An increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? b. The depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? X X X X X X X X X X X X R:\STAFFRPT~WALCO'Ff. IS 8/4/95 klb 3 Yes 10. Risk of Upset. Will the proposal' result in: a. A risk of an explosion or the release of any hazardous substances in the event of an accident or upset conditions (hazardous substances includes, but is not limited to, pesticides, chemicals, oil or radiation)? __ b. The use, storage, transport or disposal of any hazardous or toxic materials (including, but not limited to oil, pesticicles, chemicals, or radiation)? _ c. Possible interference with an emergency response plan or an emergency evacuation plan? __ 11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area7 _ 12. Homing. Will the proposal affect existing housing or create a demand for additional housing7 13. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? __ c. Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems, including public transportation? __ d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? X 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have substantial effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? b. Police protection? c. Schools? d. Parks or other recreational facilities? Maybe X X X N_.q X X X X X X X X X X R:~STAFFRFI~WALCOTr.lS 8/4/95 lab 4 Yes Maybe N_9.o e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? X f. Other governmental services: __ 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? __ b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources or energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? __ 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to any of the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas? __ b. Communications systems? _ c. Water systems? __ d. Sanitary sewer systems or septic tanks? __ e. Storm water drainage systems? X f. Solid waste disposal systems? __ g. Will the proposal result in a disjointed or inefficient pattern of utility delivery system improvements for any of the above? _ 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in: a. The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? __ b. The exposure of people to potential health hazards, including the exposure of sensitive receptors (such as hospitals and schools) to toxic pollutant emissions? __ 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in: a. The obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public? __ b. The creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? __ c. Detrimental visual impacts on the surrounding area? __ 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational resources or opportunities? __ X X X X X X X X X X X X R:\STAFFRPT~WALCOTT.IS 8/4195 klb 5 20. Cultural Resources. C, d, Will the proposal result-in: The alteration or destruction of any paleontologic, prehistoric, archaeological or historic site? Adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure, or object? Any potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique .ethnic cultural values? Restrictions to existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area7 ' Yes Maybe _No _ x ] X X X R:XSTAFFRPT~WALCOTT.IS 8/4/95 klb 6 HI. DISCUSSION OF ~ ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Earth l.a. No. The proposal will not result in unstable earth conditions or changes in geologic substructures. Any potential unstable conditions shall be mitigated through planting of slopes for erosion control (consistent with Uniform Building Code Standards and Ordinance No. 457) and through proper compaction of the soils. Construction and grading for this development will not be at depths which would affect any geologic substructures. No impacts are foreseen as a result of this project. 1.b. Yes. The proposal will result in the disruption, displacement, compaction, or overcovering of the soil. The project will require grading, and all grading activity requires disruptions, displacements, compaction and overcovering of the soil. Cut and fill slopes will be created, as well as additional roadway. The mount of disruption, displacement, compaction and overcovering of the soil will be the minimum amount needed to realize the project. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 1.C. Yes. The proposal will result in a change in the site topography and ground surface relief features. As discussed in response l.b., only the minimum amount of Fading necessary to create the roadway (including cut and fill areas) will be conducted. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 1.d. No. The proposal will not result in 'the destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical futures. No unique geologic features exist on the site. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project: 1 .e,f. Yes. This project will result in increased wind and water erosion of soils both on and off-site and in changes in siltation, deposition, and erosion. Grading will occur during the construction phase for the project. The potential for wind and water erosions of soil will increase from the creation of manufactured slopes. Short-term impacts will be mitigated through grading techniques that are consistent with Air Quality regulations and best grading practices. Long-term impacts will be mitigated through slope landscaping and the construction of the roadway. Erosion control measures will be implemented and will have to be consistent with Uniform Building Code Standards and Ordinance No. 457. Ordinance No. 457 has requirements for plant types and spacing which provides erosion control that will be effective. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. l.g. Yes. The proposal will result in minor modifications to several existing drainage channels. According to the Hydrology and Hydraulics Report for the Walcott Corridor (prepared by Robert Bein, William Frost and Associates dated December, 1994), the Walcott Lane segment of the corridor will cross four existing stream beds. Storm drain facilities will be installed at each of these locations. The Report further states that an existing stream traverses Calle Chapos at four separate locations. The proposed improvements will limit the stream crossing to two locations along Calle Chapos. Prior to any modification to the channel, clearances will need to be obtained from the Army Corps of Engineers and the California Department of Fish and Game. This will assure that any potential impacts are mitigated to a level less than significant. The project will not result in modifications to any wash, creek, river or lake since none are proximate to the site. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. R:\STAFFRPT~WALCOTT.IS 814195 klb 7 l.h. l.i. Air 2.a,b. 2.c. Water 3.a. 3.b, 3.c. 3.d. Maybe. Development of the project may expose people and property to earthquake hazards because the project is located in Southern California, an area which is seismically active. The project does not include any habitable structures; however, as discussed in responses I 1 and 12, the project is growth inducing. The project will not expose people or property'to geologic hazards such as landslides, mudslides, ground failure or liquefaction. No known landslides are located on the site or proximate to the site. The same is true for mudslides. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. No. The proposal does not include development within an Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone as identified by the State of California, Resource Agency Department of Conservation Special Studies Zone Map. Therefore, no significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. Yes. The project will result in increased air emissions and has a potential to deteriorate ambient air quality in the short-run. Air emissions and objectionable odors will probably occur during the construction phase of the project. These impacts will be of short duration and are not considered significant. The General Plan Final EIR (page 11) states Air Quality is regionally significant, but locally mitigated to a level of insignificance. Therefore, although there will be additional air emissions, there will be no deterioration of ambient air quality locally in the long run. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. No. The project will not result in alterations of air movement, temperature, or moisture, or in any change in climate either locally or regionally. The scale of the project precludes it from creating any significant impacts. on the environment in this area. Yes. The proposal will result in changes to currents, and in changes to the course or direction of water movements in flesh waters. Modifications are proposed to an unnamed draw that traverses Calle Chapos at four separate locations. The proposed improvements will modify the draw, limiting the crossing to two locations (reference response 1.b). The modifications will not be significant, therefore; no significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. Yes. The proposal will result .in changes to absorption rates, drainage panems and the rate and amount of surface runoff. Previously permeable ground will be rendered impervious by construction of the roadway. While absorption rates and surface runoff will change, impacts shall be mitigated through the numerous drainage improvements that are included as part of this project. Any graded slopes will be planted to prevent erosion and additional runoff. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. No. The proposal will not result ih alterations to the course or flow of flood waters. The project is not located adjacent to the one hundred year flood plain, is'not located within an identified floodway and is not within the Dam Inundation area identified in Figure 74 of the City of Temecula General Plan. No significant impacts_are anticipated as a result of this project. Maybe. The proposal could result in a change in the amount of surface water in any waterbody. As mentioned above under response 3.a., modifications are proposed to an unnamed draw that R:\STAFFRPT~WALCOTT.IS 8/4t95 lab 8 traverses Calle Chapos at four separate locations. Surfaces will be rendered impervious as a result of this project and any residential- development that occurs as a result of the project and this could result in an increase in amount and velocity of surface water in the draws. Any potential impacts will be mitigated through drainage conveyances which are proposed to be included as part of the project. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 3.e. lVlaybe. The proposal could result in discharges into surface waters or in any alteration of surface water quality. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit for the project, the applicant will have to comply with the provisions of a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent has been fried or the project is shown to be exempt. By complying with the NPDES requirements, any potential impacts can be mitigated to a level less .than significant. Therefore, no significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 3.f. No. The proposal will not result in an alteration of the direction or rate of flow of groundwaters. Construction on the site will not be at depths sufficient to have a significant impact on ground waters. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 3.g. 3.h. No. The proposal will not result in a change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions, withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations. Reference response 3.f. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. No. The project will not result in the reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies. The project does not propose any use that would generate a need for water provision. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 3.i. No. The proposal will not expose people or property to water related hazards such as flooding. Reference response 3 .d. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. Plant Life 4.a,b. Maybe. The proposal may- result in a change to the diversity of species, or number of any native' species of plants, in a reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, threatened, or endangered species of plants and in the creation of a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species on- site. According to Page 6 of the Biological Resources Study: Waltoil Corridor Street Improvement (dated August 26, 1994) prepared by SJM Biological Consultants, dated December 4, 1994, portions of the site are covered by Coastal Sage Scrub and riparian plant communities. Mitigation measures for the Gnatcatcher shall include construction of Walcott Lane to be done outside the usual nesting season of the Gnatcatcher. Mitigation measures in place during the construction phase shall include erosion control measures and staking areas that construction vehicles shall be prohibited from entering/disturbing. The Report concludes on page 9, any impacts to the stream crossing Walcon Lane could reqtfire a 1601 streambed alteration agreement from the California Department of Fish and Game. If required, the permit application will be accompanied by a mitigation plan which normally includes site restoration. As a result of these mitigation measures, no significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. R:\STAFFRF~WALCOTT.IS 8/4195 k. lb 9 4.c. Yes. The project will result in the introduction of new species of plants into an area of native vegetation and cream a barrier to. the normal replenishment of existing species. Most of the area is already disturbed and is currently being used as a roadway. Slopes graded for the project will need to be planted for erosion control, and this will introduce non-native species to the area. This planting will be adjacent to an area that has previously been disturbed. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 4.d. No. The project will not result in a reduction in the acreage of any agricultural crop. The City of Temecula Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) did not identify the site as farmland of local importance. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. Animal Life 5.a,b,d,e. Maybe. The project may result in a change in the diversity of species, or numbers of species of animals. The project site does lie within the Stephens Kangaroo Rat Habitat Conservation Plan Fee Area. According to Appendix A of the Biological Resources Study: Walcott Corridor Street Improvement (dated August 26, 1994) signs of SKR were not found within the limits of the project right-of-way. For other species, reference the responses to 4.a. and 4.b. above. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 5.c. No. The proposal will not result in the introduction of any new wildlife species into the area. Projects of this nature do not introduce new wildlife species into the area. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. Noise 6.a. Yes. The proposal could result in increases to existing noise levels from increased traffic since the road is currently unimproved (din). In addition,. noise levels will increase during the construction .phase of the project. The Walcott Corridor is not identified as a roadway that will produce -significant noise beyond the right-of-way at buildout of the City according to Figure 8-5 of the City's General Plan (Future Roadway Noise Contours). No significant impacts from noise are anticipated as a result of this project. Yes. The project will expose people to severe noise levels during the development/construction phase. Construction machinery is capable of producing noise in the range of 100+ DBA at 100 feet which is considered very annoying and can cause hearing damage from steady 8-hour exposure. This source of noise will be of short duration and therefore will not be considered significant. As discussed in response 6.a., vehicle noise will not affect any sensitive receptors in the area. No significant impacts are anticipated either in the short- or long-run. 6.c. Yes. The proposal will result in the exposure of people to severe vibrations during the development/construction phase. 'The vibrations will be of short duration and therefore are not considered significant. The proposal will not result in the exposure of people to severe vibrations over the long-run. No significant impacts are anticipated either in the short or long run. R:\STAFFP, PT~WALCO~'r.13 8/4/95 klb lO Light and Glare , Yes. The proposal will ultimately produce and result in additional sources of light and glare. It is anticipated that additional night vehicle trips' will be generated on the improved roadway. Motorists traveling at night will use their headlamps to illuminate the roadway. Some stray illumination may reflect upon houses in the area. This illumination of the roadway is not considered significant. Street lamps are not proposed as pan of the project. No significant impacts are foreseen from light and glare. Land Use 8.a. Maybe. The proposal may alter the present land use of the area since there are undeveloped parcels in the area. With the improvement of the Walcott Corridor, some of the land owners may be motivated to develop their parcels. Currently, people interested in subdividing their property are required to improve their property to a City maintained road. This means improving portions of the Walcott Corridor. This has proven to be cost prohibitive for small subdivisions. Vacant parcels have the potential to be developed with the improvements included in this project. Because of the General Plan land use designation of properties in the vicinity of the area (low-medium density residential, 3-6 dwelling units/acre and very low density residential, .2-.4 dwelling units per acre) the impacts will be negligible. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 8.b. No. The proposal will not result in an alteration to the future planned land use in the vicinity of the project as described City's General Plan. The General Plan Land Use designations for properties in the vicinity of the project are (low-medium density residential, 3-6 dwelling units/acre and very low density residential, .2-.4 dwelling units per acre). No changes to the General Plan Land Use Designations are proposed as a result of this project. The General Plan Circulation Plan identifies the Walcott Corridor as a Optional Rural Arterial Highway and this is how the project is going to be developed. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. Natural Resources 9.a,b. Yes. The proposal will result in an increase in the rate of use of any natural resource and the depletion of any nonrenewable resource. Development of the site will result in a minor. incremental increase in the rate of use of natural resources (construction materials, fuels for the daily operation, asphalt, etc.) and the subsequent depletion of these non-renewable natural resources. Due to the scale of the proposed development, these impacts are not seen as significant. Risk of Upset lO.a,b. Maybe. The proposal may result in a risk of explosion, or the release of any hazardous substances in the event of an accident or upiet conditions. The project is a proposal to pave a currently unimproved roadway. As a result of the roadway improvements, traffic will increase on the Walcott Corridor. The increase in traffic may result in the increase in the probability of risk of explosion, or the release of any hazardous substances in the event of an accident or upset conditions. The same is true for the use, storage, transport or disposal of any hazardous or toxic materials. Due to the limited traffic which is expected from this project, and the fact that the Walcott Corridor is not identified as a truck route, no significant impacts are anticipated. R:\STAFFRFBWALCOTr. IS 8/4/95 klb 1 I 10.c. No. The project will not interfere with an emergency response plan or an emergency evaluation plan. With the addition of a fire station east of Interstate 15, existing emergency response plans and/or emergency evaluation plans will be enhanced through the contribution of an all-weather road in this area. No significant impacts are anticipau-~d as a result of this project. Population 11. Maybe. The project may result in altering the location, distribution, density or growth rate of the human population of the area. Reference response 8.a. and 8.b. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. Homing 12. Maybe. Reference response 11. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. Transportation/Circulation 13.a. No. The proposal will not result in the generation of substantial additional vehicular movement. Vehicular traffic is anticipated to increase became the roadway will be improved from dirt to asphalt. The roadway will be twenty-eight (28) feet wide and is classified as an Optional Rural Arterial Highway in the City's General Plan, and is not designed to carry substantial numbers of vehicles. No significant impacts are expected from development of the site. 13.b. No. The project will not result in an increased demand for new paricing. The project does not propose any use that would generate a need for parking. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 13 .c. No. The proposal will not create impacts upon existing transportation systems, including public transportation. Walcott Corridor improvements are classified as Priority I in the City of Temecula Capital Improvement Program 1996-2000. The scope of work is described as environmental analysis, design and construction of an interim two lane roadway to extend from the intersection of Nicolas Road and Calle Medusa to Calle Chapos to Calle Girasol to Walcott Road to La Serena Way. Design of the improvements are slated for fiscal years 1994-95 and 1995-96 and construction and administration in fiscal year 1995-96. This will provide an additional north-south route in this portion of the City. No improvements to the public transportation systems are proposed in this area. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 13.d. No. The proposal will not result in alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods. Currently, there is circulation or movement of people and/or goods in the area. Vehicular traffic is anticipated to increase because the roadway will be improved from dirt to asphalt; however, no significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 13.e. No. The proposal will not result in alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic since none exists currently in the proximity of the site and none are proposed. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. R:\STAFFR.PT\WALCOTT.IS 8/4/95 klb 13 .f. Yes. The proposal will result in an increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians. Any increase in traffic by motor 'vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians will result in an increase in traffic hazards. Current and future conditions are typical conditions that exist at any interface between pedestrians, bicyclists and automobiles. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. Public Services 14.a,b.. No. The proposal will not have a substantial effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered fire protection or new or altered police protection. The project does not propose any use that would generate a n.e~ed for new or altered fire or police protection. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 14.c,d. No. The proposal will not have a substantial effect upon or result in a need for new or altered school facilities or new or altered parks or other recreational facilities. This project does not propose any use that would generate a need for school facilities or new or altered parks or other recreational facilities. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 14.e. Yes. The proposal will result in a need for the maintenance of public facilities, including roads. Funding for maintenance of roads is derived from the Gasoline Tax which is distributed to the City of Temecula from the State of California and local assessments. Impacts to current and future needs for maintenance of roads as a result of development of the site are incremental and are not considered significant. This is because the Gasoline Tax and the local assessments are sufficient to cover any of the proposed expenses. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 14.f. No. The proposal will not have a substantial affect upon or result in a need for new or altered governmental services. Reference response 14.e. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. Energy 15.a. No. The proposal will not result in the use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy. As mentioned in responses 9.a. and 9.b. the proposal may result in an increase in the rate of use of any natural resource or the depletion of any nonrenewable resource. Development of the site will result in an increase in the rate of use of natural resources (construction materials, fuels for the daily operation, asphalt, etc.) and the subsequent depletion of these non-renewable natural resources. Due to the nature of this project (a roadway), impacts are not seen as significant. 15.b. No. The project will not result in a substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, nor will the project require the development of new sources of energy. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 'Utilities 16.a-d,f. No. The proposal will not result in a need for ;~ew systems or substantial alterations to power or natural gas, communication systems, water systems, sewer systems, solid waste disposal systems. The project does not propose any use or uses that would generate in a need for these new systems R:\STAFFRPT~WALCOTT.I$ 81.~195 klb 13 or substantial alterations to existing systems. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 16.e. Yes. The proposal will result in a need for a minor addition to on-site storm water drainage systems. Drainage conveyances will be required which will safely and adequately handle any of the runoff which is created by the realization of the project. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 16.g. No. The proposal will not result in a disjointed or inefficient pattern of utility delivery system improvements for any of the above. (reference response No. 16.a-d,f.). No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. Human Health 17.a,b. No. The proposal will not result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard. Projects of this nature do not result in the creation of health hazards or potential health hazards. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. Aesthetics 18.a-c. No. The proposal will not result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view, or in detrimental visual impacts on the surrounding area. The project is a proposal to pave a dirt road which is already being used and for associated Fading that will be required by the project. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. Recreation 19. No. The proposal will not result in impacts to the quality or quantity of existing recreational resources or opportunities. .The project does not propose any use that would impact the quality or quantity of existing recreational resources or opportunities. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. Cultural Resources 20.a. Maybe. The proposal may result in the alteration or destruction of any paleontologic, prehistoric, archaeological or historic site or structure. The site has been previously disturbed. The City General Plan identified this area as an "Area of Sensitivity for Archaeological Resources". Any future impacts will be mitigated through the application of standard City paleontologic and archaeologic development conditions. In addition, if needed, onsite archaeologic and Native American heritage resource experts will monitor activities on the site." No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 20.b-d. No. The project will not have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values. No "unique" ethnic cultural values have been identified on or in proximity to the site. The proposal will not result in restrictions to existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area. None currently exist on the site. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. R:\STAFFRP'BWALCOTT.IS 8/4/95 Idb 14 IV. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE YeS Maybe No Does the project have the potential to either: degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish, wildlife or bird species, cause a fish, wildlife or bird population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant, bird or animal species, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? X Does the project have the potential to achieve short term, to the disadvantage of long term, environmental goals? (A short term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long term impacts will endure well into the future.) X Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable7 (A project's impact on two or more separate resources may be relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) X Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? X R:\STAFFRPT~WALCO'I'r.I$ 8/4/95 Idb 15 ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed projea could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because the Mitigation Measures described on the attached sheets and in the Conditions of Approval that have been added to the project will mitigate any potentially significant impacts to a level of insignificance, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. X I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. Prepared by: Matthew Fagan, Assistant Planner ate R:%,STAFFRF~WAI,COTT.IS 8/4/95 klb 1(5 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBTECT: Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer Scott Harvey, Associate Engineer Debbie Ubnoske, Planning Manag-,~~, Matthew Fagan, Associate Planner August 30, 1995 Walcott Corridor Street Improvements (PW94-10) Negative Mitigation Measures Declaration The purpose of this memorandum is to summarize the mitigation measures for the Walcott Corridor Street Improvements (PW94-10) which are identified in the Initial Environmental Study (IES) for the project. The IES for development of the Walcott Corridor Street Improvements was completed on July 31, 1995. The IES evaluated the potential for adverse environmental impacts and identified several potentially significant impacts to the environment. The adverse impacts were in the areas of earth, water, plant life, animal life and cultural resources. The Initial Environmental Study also identified that these potentially significant impacts could be rnitigated to a level of insignificance through the incorporation of certain features into the design of the project. Listed below are the Mitigation Measures which must be incorporated into the project to reduce the potentially significant impacts associated with this project. The impacts and mitigation measures are as follows: 1. IMPACT: An increase'in wind and water erosion of soils both on and off-site and in changes in siltation, deposition, and erosion. MEASURE: Short-term impacts will be mitigamd through grading techniques that are consistent with Air Quality regulations and best grading practices. Long-term impacts will be mitigated through site landscaping and the ' construction of hardscape. Erosion control measures will have to be consistent with Uniform Building Code Standards and Ordinance No. 457. IMPLEMENTING AGENCY: Depatuuent of Public Works 2. IMPACT: Minor modifications to several existing drainage channels and in changes to the course or direction of water movements in fresh waters. MEASURE: Clearances will need to be obtained from the Army Corps of Engineers and the California Department of Fish and Game. IMPLEMENTING AGENCY: Depmu~iefit of Public Works R:\PL,ANN1NG'~WALCOTT.I~M 8/30/95 Ir. lb IMPACT: Changes to absorption rates, drainage patterns and the rate and mount of surface runoff and in the amount of surface water in any waterbody. MEASURE: Drainage conveyances shall be provided to safely and adequately handle any of the runoff which is created by the project. IMPLEMENTING AGENCY: Department of Public Works IMPACT: MEASURE: Discharges into surface waters which will result in alterations to surfac~ water quaiity. Comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent has been filed or the project is shown to be exempt. IMPLEMENTING AGENCY: Depa~m,ent of Public Works IMPACT: A change to the diversity of species, or number of any native species of plants, in a reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, threatened, or endangered species of plants and in the creation of a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species on-site. MEASURE: Construction of Walcott Lane shall be done outside the usual nesting season of the Gnatcatcher. Further, erosion control measures and staking areas for construction vehicles be prohibited from entering/disturbing portions of the site which are covered by riparian plant communities. Any impacts to the stream crossing Walcott Lane could require a 1601 streambed alteration agreement and may need to be accompanied by a mitigation plan which normally includes site restoration from the California Department of Fish and Game. IMPLEMENTING AGEN(~Y: Planni;~g Department and Depathuent of Public Works 6. IMPACT: A change in the diversity of species, or numbers of species of animals. · MEASURE: See Measure for No. 4. <, IMPLEMENTING AGENCY: Planning Department and Depa~u,ent of Public Works R:~PLANNING~WALCOTTJdEM 8/20/95 lab IMPACT: The proposal may result in the alteration or destruction of any paleontologic, prehistoric, archaeological or historic site or su'ucture. MEASURE: When necessary, a paleonwlogist/archaeologist or representative shall have the authority to temporarily divert, redirect or halt grading activity to allow recovery of fossils. Application of standard City paleontologic and archaeologic development procedures. In addition, if needed, onsite archaeologic and Native American heritage resource experts will moniwr activities on the site. IMPLEMENTING AGENCY: PIning Department and Depaxunent of Public Works R: ~pLANN1NG~,WALCOTT.MEM .8/30/95 k, lb ITEM 11 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE DIRE '0 CITY MANAG~~ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer November 28, 1995 Release Faithful Performance Warranty, Labor and Material, Monument bonds in Tract No. 22715-2. (Northwesterly of intersection of Rancho Vista Road at Butterfield Stage Road) and the PREPARED BY:/~. Steven Cresswell, Principal Engineer ~Albert Crisp, Permit Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council AUTHORIZE the release of ~=aithful Performance and Labor and Material bonds for Street, and Water and Sewer Improvements, and the Subdivision Monumentation Bond, in Tract No. 22715-2, and DIRECT the City Clerk to so advise the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, the Developer, and the Surety. BACKGROUND: On August 1, 1989, the Riverside County Board of Supervisors entered into subdivision agreements with: Tayco (Joint Venture of Taylor Woodrow Homes & Cosrain Homes, Inc.) 4921 Birch Street, Suite 110 Newport Beach, CA 92660 for the improvement of streets, installation of sewer and water systems, and subdivision monumentation. Accompanying the subdivision agreements were surety bonds issued by American Home Assurance Company as follows: 1. Bond No. PB 30011134in the amount of $472,000to cover street improvements. 2. Bond No. PB 30011134 in the amount of $116,500 to cover water improvements. 3. Bond No. PB 30011134 in the amount of '$100,500 to cover sewer improvements. Bond No. PB 30011134 in the amount of $344,500 to cover material and labor for street, water, and sewer improvements._ 5. Bond No. PB 30011135 in the amount of $24,600 to cover subdivision monumentation. r:~agdtpt~95\1128\tr227152.~1 Effective December 31, 1993, Costain Homes Inc. withdrew from the joint venture partnership. The nalne of the new partnership is Tayco, a California General Partnership (comprised of Taylor Woodrow Homes California Limited, a California Corporation, and Taylor Woodrow Real Estate, a California Corporation). A new agreement has been executed by the partnership and riders to the Bonds have been submitted for City Council acceptance. On April 26, 1994, the City Council accepted the public improvements, initiated the one-year warranty period, and authorized the reduction in faithful performance bond to the following warranty amount: Streets/Drainage, Water and Sewer: Bond No. PB 300 11 345 $ 68,900 Public Works Staff has reviewed the project and all necessary repairs/replacements have been satisfactorily completed. The Public Works Department therefore recommends that the Faithful Performance warranty bond be released. The developer was required to post Material and Labor Bonds to ensure payment to suppliers and workers. These bonds are maintained in effect for a period of time determined by the Subdivision Improvement Agreement or statute after the City Council has accepted the public improvements. The contractual claim period has run and no claims have been filed with the City. Therefore Staff recommends that the following Labor and Material Bond posted by American Assurance Company be released: Bond No. PB 300 11 134 in the amount of $344,450. The inspection and verification process relating to the survey monumentation has been completed by the City staff, and the Department of Public Works recommends the release of the Monument Bond. Therefore it is appropriate to exonerate this bond as follows: Bond No. PB300 11 135 in the amount of $24,600 to cover survey monumentation. The affected streets are Corte Coronado, Corte Chatada, San Vincente, and portions of Butterfield Stage Road, Rancho Vista Road, Calle Resaca, Corte Santa Catalina, and Corte Las Cruces. These streets will be accepted into the City Maintained-Street System by Resolution No. 95- . Butterfield Stage Road in this area was accepted into the City Maintained-Street System by Resolution No. 95-29. FISCAL IMPACT: None. Attachment: Location Map r:~agdrpt\95X1128Xtr227152.rd l._4AIr. J,' O r..jLJFOl. J,lla .~OJO yr ~27:'5.- t A~7~ 2.'-,"5' f''5'~' '~°~'~ PROJECT SITE VICINITY MAP TRACT NO. 22715- 2- Location Map TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer November 28, 1995 AcceptanCe of Public Streets into the City Maintained-Street System (Within Tracts No. 22715-2, and 22715-F). (Northwesterly of intersection of Butterfield Stage Road at Rancho Vista Road). PREPARED BY:/~k~ Steven Cresswell, Principal Engineer ,~ Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer. RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled:. RESOLUTION NO. 95-_ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY-MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM (WITHIN TRACTS NO. 22715-2, and 22715-F) BACKGROUND: The Riverside County Board of Supervisors approved Tracts No. 22715-2 on August 1, 1.989, 21, 1989, and Tracts No. 22715-F on September 12, 1989, and entered into subdivision 'agreements for the improvement of streets and drainage, sewer and water systems, and survey monumentation with: Tayco (Joint Venture of Taylor Woodrow Homes & Costain Homes, Inc.) 4921 Birch Street, Suite 110 Newport Beach, CA 92660 The developer has improved, to City standards, the public improvements in accord with the subdivision agreements. The City Council previously accepted the public improvements, and released the Labor and Material and the Survey monumentation Bonds. The Public Works Department recommends release of the Faithful Performance Improvement Warranty securities as all required maintenance and repairs have been satisfactorily completed. Under provisions of the Streets and Highways Code (Section 1806), public streets offered by the subdivider must be accepted by City Council resolution in order to be r:\agdrpt~95\l 128\tr227156.sts included in the public-street maintained system. The streets so affected are Corte Coronado, Corte Chatada, Corte Las Cruces, Corte Santa Catalina, San Vincente, and portions of Rancho Vista Road, Butterfield Stage Road, and Calle Resaca. This portion of Butterfield Stage Road was accepted into the City Maintained-Street System by Resolution No. 95-29. Inasmuch as certain state funds are earmarked for maintenance of these publicly-maintained streets, the process will make these streets eligible for those funds. FISCAL IMPACT: These streets wil! be integrated into the City's Pavement Management System and will receive periodic surface and/or structural maintenance efforts. The new pavement condition of these streets should necessitate only limited surface or structural treatments for 7 to 10 years. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution No. 95- with Exhibits "A-B", inclusive. cc: Brad Buron, Maintenance Superintendent r:~agdrpt~95\1128~tr227156 .sts RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TF_2VIECULA, CALIFORNIA, ACC~G CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO THECITY-MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM (WITHIN TRACTS NO. 2271~-2, and 22715-F.) · THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TElVIECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, Tayco (Joint Venture of Taylor Woodrow Homes & Costain Homes, Inc.) (Now Tayco, a California General Partnership comprised of Taylor Woodrow Homes California Limited, a California Corporation, and Taylor Woodrow Real Estate, a California Corporation), offered for dedication to the County of Riverside certain streets within Tracts No. 22715-2 and 22715-F, for public street and public utility purposes, and said County of Riverside accepted said offers of dedication by Board of Supervisors action on August 1, 1989, (Tract No. 22715-2), and September 12, 1989, (Tract No. 22715-F). WHEREAS, The City of Temecuh became successors-in-interest to the County of Riverside upon incorporation, effective December 1, 1989. WltF~RF~AS, Tayco (Joint Venture of Taylor Woodrow Homes & Costain Homes, Inc.)(Now Tayco, a California General hrtnership comprised of Taylor Woodrow Homes California Limited, a California Corporation, and Taylor Woodrow Real Estate, a California Corporation) has improved to City standards, public improvements within the several streets offered for dedication withhi Tracts No. 22715-2, and 22715-F, the legal descriptions of which are set forth in Exhibit "A" and are depicted in Exhibit ~B~. WBF~REAS, the City desires to accept into the City-maintained street system the public improvements within all or portions of the public streets offered to and accepted by the County of Riverside as depicted in Exhibit "B" ; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Temecula as follows: Section' 1. That the City of Temecula accept into the City-maintained street system those streets or portions of public streets offered to and accepted by the County of Riverside described in Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto. Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution and accept the streets and portions thereof, offered to and accepted by the County of Riverside, into the City- maintained street system as described in Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTI~J), by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 28th day of November, 1995. Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor r:XagdrptX95~1128\tr227156.sts ATTEST: June S. Greek City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) CITY OF TEMF~ULA ) SS I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 95- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 28th day of November, 1995, by the foilowing vote: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCn,M MBERS: ABSENT: - COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: - CO~CKlVlEMBERS: r:\agdrpt\95~1128\tr227156.sts ~XRIB1T "A" TO RESOLUTION NO. 95- Accepting the public streets offered to and accepted by the County of Riverside as indicated on Tram No. 22715-2, and 22715-F, and accepting subject public streets into the City- Maintained-Street System as described below: A. Those lots described as Lots "A" through "H" inclusive, as shown on Tract No. 22715-2, f'ded 16 August 1989, in Book 205 of Maps, Pgs 5965, further described as follows: (lot *An) (Lot "B*)* (Lot "C*) (Lot "D") (Lot hen) (Lot nF*) (Lot "Gn) (Lot "H") Portion of Ranclio Vista Road Portion of Butterfield Stage Road Portion of Calle Resaca Corte Chatada Corte San Vinccnte Corte Coronado Portion of Corte Santa Catalina Portion of Corte Las Cruces B. Those lots described as Lots "A" through "D" inclusive, as shown on Tract 22715-F, fled 14 September 1989, in Book 206 of Maps, Pgs 75-79, further described as follows: (Lot "A") (Lot "B")* (Lot "C") (Lot "D") Portion of Rancho Vista Road Portion of Butterfield Stage Road Portion of Corte Las Cruces Portion of Corte Santa Catalina * Butterfield Stage Road was accepted into the City Maintained-Street System in this area by Resolution No. 95-29. r:\agdrpt\95\1128\tr227156 .sts EXHIBIT "B" TO RESOLUTION NO. 95- . SUBJECT ACCEPTANCE- PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY-MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM AS INDICATED BELOW: T .EGE~rD S'T'R.E_rC$ O1~ PORTLONS OF TO BE ACC::Z. FTTD Ef'L"O CZT'Yo hiA.[NT~ 5'TKE-rF 5YS"Z"EM Yl/fl tf/t/ll/ I I ,aNtNO VICINITy MAP NO ~C4LE ITEM 13 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer November 28, 1995 Release Faithful Performance Warranty, Labor and Material, and Monument Bonds in Tract No. 22715-F. (Northwest corner of Rancho Vista Road at Butterfield Stage Road). PREPARED BY://v-~ Steven Cresswell, Principal Engineer ~ Albert Crisp, Permit Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council, AUTHORIZE the release of' Faithful Performance Warranty and Labor and Material bonds for Street, and Water and Sewer improvements, and the Subdivision Monumentation bond in Tract No. 22715-F, and DIRECT the City Clerk to so advise the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, the Developer, and the Surety. BACKGROUND: On September 12, 1989, the Riverside County Board of Supervisors entered into subdivision agreements with: Tayco (Joint Venture of Taylor Woodrow Homes & Costain Homes, Inc.) 4921 Birch Street, Suite 110 Newport Beach, CA 92660 for the improvement of streets, installation of sewer and water systems, and subdivision monumentation. Accompanying the subdivision agreements were surety bonds issued by American Home Assurance Company as follows: 1. Bond No. PB 30011345in the amount of $432,000to cover street improvements. 2. Bond No. PB 30011345in the amount of $83,500to cover water improvements. 3. Bond No. PB 30011345in the amount of $34,500to cover sewer improvements. e Bond No. PB 30011345 in the amount of $275,000 to cover material and labor for street, water, and sewer improvements. 5. Bond No. PB 30011346 in the amount of $15,000 to cover subdivision monumentation. R:~agdrpt\95\1128\tr22715f. rel Effective December 31, 1993, Costain Homes Inc. withdrew from the joint venture partnership. The name of the new partnership is Tayco, a California General Partnership (comprised of Taylor Woodrow Homes California Limited, a California Corporation, and Taylor Woodrow Real Estate, a California Corporation). A new agreement has been executed by the partnership and riders to the Bonds have been submitted for City Council acceptance. On April 26, 1994, the City Council accepted the public improvements, initiated the one-year warranty period, and authorized the reduction in faithful performance bond to the following warranty amount: Streets/Drainage, Water and Sewer: Bond No. PB 300 11 345 $ 55,000 Public Works Staff has reviewed the project and all necessary repairs/replacements have been satisfactorily completed. The Public Works Department therefore recommends that the Faithful Performance warranty bond be released. The developer is also required to post Material and Labor Bonds to ensure payment to suppliers and workers. These bonds are maintained in effect for a period of time determined by the Subdivision Improvement Agreement or statute after the City Council has accepted the public improvements. The contractual six-month claim period has run and no claims have been filed with the City. Therefore Staff recommends that the following Labor and Material Bond be released: Bond No, PB300 I 1 345 in the amount of $275,000. The inspection and verification process relating to the survey monumentation has been completed by the City staff, and the Department of Public Works recommends the release of the Monument Bond. Therefore it is appropriate to exonerate this bond as follows: Bond No. PB300 11 346 in the amount of $15,000. The affected streets are portions of Corte Las Cruces, Corte Santa Catalina, Butterfield Stage Road, and Rancho Vista Road. These streets will be accepted into the City Maintained-Street System by Resolution No. 95- . Butterfield Stage Road in this area was previously accepted into the City Maintained-Street System by Resolution No. 95-29. FISCAL IMPACT: None. Attachment: Location Map R:~agdrpt\95\i128\tr22715f. r~l PROJECT TRACT NO. 22715-F Location .Map i'I'EM 14 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: GITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer November 28, 1995 Release Faithful Performance Warranty, Labor and Material, and Monument Bonds in Tract No. 22716-1. (Southwesterly of intersection of Rancho California Road at Meadows Parkway) PREPARED BY: ~, Steven Cresswell, Principal Engineer ~Albert Crisp, Permit Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council AUTHORIZE the release of Faithful Performance Warranty and Labor and Material bonds for Street, Water, and Sewer improvements, and the Subdivision Monumentation Bond, in Tract No. 22716-1, and DIRECT the City Clerk to so advise the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, the Developer, and the Surety. BACKGROUND: On July 25, 1989, the Riverside County Board of Supervisors entered into subdivision agreements with: Tayco (Joint Venture of .Taylor Woodrow Homes & Costain Homes, Inc.) 4921 Birch Street, Suite 110 Newport Beach, CA 92660 for the improvement of streets and storm drains, installation of sewer and water systems, and subdivision monumentation. Accompanying the subdivision agreements were surety bonds issued by American Home Assurance- Company as follows: Bond No. PB300 11 137 in the amount of $1,769,500to cover street and storm drain improvements. 2. Bond No. PB300 11 137 in the amount of $105,000 to cover water improvements. 3. Bond No. PB300 11 137 in the amount of $188,486 to cover sewer improvements. Bond No. PB300 11 137 in the amount of $1,032,250to cover material and labor for street, water, and sewer improvements. agdtpt\95\l128~Tr227161.rel 5. Bond No. PB300 11 138 in the amount of $16,000 to cover subdivision monumentation. Effective December 31, 1993, Cosrain Homes Inc. withdrew from the joint venture partnership. The name of the new partnership is TAYCO, a California General Partnership (comprised of Taylor Woodrow Homes California Limited, a California Corporation, and Taylor Woodrow Real Estate, a California Corporation). A new agreement has been executed by the partnership and riders to the bonds, changing the obligee from the County to the City, the Principal from Tayco to TAYCO, and reducing the Faithful Performance bond amounts, have been submitted for City Council acceptance. On July 12, 1994, the City Council accepted the public improvements, initiated the one-year warranty period, and authorized the reduction in faithful performance bond to the following warranty amount: Streets, and Water and Sewer Bond PB300 11 137 $206,999 Public Works Staff has reviewed the project and all necessary repairs/replacements have been satisfactorily completed. The Public Works Department therefore recommendsthat the Faithful Performance warranty bond be released. The developer is also required to post Labor and Material bonds to ensure payment to suppliers and workers. These bonds are maintained in effect for a period of time determined by the Subdivision Improvement Agreement or statute after the City has accepted the public improvements. The contractual six-month claim period has run and no claims have been filed with the City. Therefore Staff recommends that the following Labor and Material Bond be released: Bond No. PB300 11 137 in the amount of $1,032,250. The inspection and verification process relating to the survey monumentation has been completed by the City staff, and the Department of Public Works recommends the release of the Monument Bond. Therefore it is appropriate to exonerate this bond as follows: Bond No. PB300 I 1 138 in the amount of $16,000. The affected streets are Corte Higuera, Via Toreno, Vintage Hills Drive, and a portion of Meadows Parkway, Rancho Vista Road, Camino Marea, and Rancho California Road. These streets were accepted into the City Maintained-Street System by Resolution No. 94-82. FISCAL IMPACT: None by this action. These streets have previously been integrated into the City's Pavement Management System and will receive periodic surface and/or structural maintenance efforts. The new pavement condition of these streets should necessitate only limited surface or structural treatments for 5 to 8 years. Attachment: Location Map R:~t~drpt~95\1128\Tr227161 .~1 Project Site " -.-.: ..~. VICINITY MAP TRACT NO. 22716-1 Location Map i'I'EM 15 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer November 28, 1995 Release Faithful Performance Warranty, Labor and FINANCE DIRECF~ CITY MANAGE Materials, and Monument Bonds in Tract No. 22716-3. (Northwesterly of intersection of Meadows Parkway at Rancho Vista Road). PREPARED BY://,'f Steven Cresswell, Principal Engineer ~ Albert Crisp, Permit Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council AUTHORIZE the release of Faithful Performance Warranty and Labor and Material bonds for Street, and Water and Sewer improvements, and the Subdivision Monumentation Bond, in Tract No 22716-3, and DIRECT the City Clerk to so advise the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, the Developer, and the Surety. BACKGROUND: On October 24, 1989, the Riverside County Board of Supervisors entered into subdivision agreements with: Tayco (Joint Venture of Taylor Woodrow Homes & Costain Homes, Inc.) 4921 Birch Street, Suite 110 Newport Beach, CA 92660 for the improvement of streets, installation of sewer and water systems, and subdivision monumentation. Accompanying the subdivision agreements were surety bonds issued by American. Home Assurance Company as follows: Bond No. PB 30011382in the amount of $193,000to cover street improvements. 2. Bond No. PB 30011382in the amount of $50,000to cover water improvements. 3. Bond No. PB 30011382in the amount of $50,000to cover sewer improvements. , Bond No. PB 30011382 in the amount of $146,000to cover material and labor for street, water, and sewer improvements. 5. Bond No. PB 30011383 in the amount of $13,700 to cover subdivision monumentation. R:~agdrpt\95\1128~,tr227163 .RE[, Effective December 31, 1993, Costain Homes Inc. withdrew from the joint venture partnership. The name of the new partnership is Tayco, a California General Partnership (comprised of Taylor Woodrow Homes California Limited, a California Corporation, and Taylor Woodrow Real Estate, a California Corporation). A new agreement has been executed by the partnership and riders to the Bonds have been submitted for City Council acceptance. On April 26, 1994, the City Council accepted the public improvements, initiated the one-year warranty period, and authorized reduction in faithful performance bond to the following warranty amount: Streets/Drainage, Water and Sewer: Bond No. PB 30011382 $ 29,300 Public Works Staff has reviewed the project and all necessary repairs/replacements have been satisfactorily completed. The Public Works Department therefore recommends that the Faithful Performance warranty bond be released. The developer was required to post Labor and Material bonds to ensure payment to suppliers and workers. These bonds are maintained in effect for a period of time determined by statute or contractual condition after the City Council has accepted the public improvements. The contractual six-month claim period has run and no claims have been filed with the City. Therefore Staff recommends that the following Labor and Material Bond be released: Bond No. PB300 11 382 in the amount of $146,000. The inspection and verification process relating to the survey monumentation has been completed by the City staff, and the Department of Public Works recommends the release of the Monument Bond. Therefore it is appropriate to exonerate this bond as follows: Bond No. PB300 11 383 in the amount of $13,700. The affected streets are being accepted into the City Maintained-Street System by City Council Resolution No. 95- at this time. The streets within the subdivision are Corte Soledad, Corte Amalia, and Via Asturiaso FISCAL IMPACT: None. Attachment: Location Map R:XagdrptX95\1128Xtr227163 .REL 81 aAMCMO VISTA ..aajl' " PROJECT SITE TRAGT NO, 2Z716-3 VICINITY MAP TRACT NO. 22716- 5 Location Map ITEM 16 TO,' FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer November 28, 1995 Acceptance of Public Streets into the City Maintained-Street System (Within Tract No. 22716-3). (Northeasterly of intersection of Meadows Parkway at Rancho Vista Road) PREPARED BY://~'Steven Cresswell, Principal Engineer /~'Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer. RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 95--- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CERTAIN STREETS INTO THE CITY-MAINTAINED STREET (WITHIN TRACT NO. 22716-3) CITY OF PUBLIC SYSTEM BACKGROUND: The Riverside County Board of Supervisors approved Tract No. 22716-3 on October 26, 1989, and entered into subdivision agreements for the improvement of streets and drainage, sewer and water systems, and survey monumentation with: Tayco (Joint Venture of Taylor Woodrow Homes & Cosrain Homes, Inc.) 4921 Birch Street, Suite 110 NeWport Beach, CA 92660 The developer has improved, to City standards, the public improvements in accord with the subdivision agreements. The City Council previously accepted the public improvements, and initiated the warranty period. Staff recommended action by the City Council on November 28, 1995, will authorize the release of the Faithful Performance warranty bond, and the Labor and Material and the Survey monumentation Bonds. The Public Works Department recommends release of the Faithful Performance Improvement Warranty securities as all required maintenance and repairs have been satisfactorily completed. No claims against the Labor and Material Bonds have been filed and the survey monumentation has been reviewed and approved by Staff. r:~egdrpt\95\l 128\tr227163.sts Under provisions of the Streets and HiOhways Code (Section 1806), public streets offered by the subdivider must be accepted by City Council resolution in order to be included in the public-street maintained system. The streets so affected are Corte Soledad, Corte Amalia, and Via Asturias. Inasmuch as certain state funds are earmarked for maintenance of these publicly -maintained streets, the process will make these streets eligible for those funds. FISCAL IMPACT: These streets will be integrated into the City's Pavement Management System and will receive periodic surface and/or structural maintenance efforts. The new pavement condition of these streets should necessitate only limited surface or structural treatments for 7 to 10 years. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution No. 95- with Exhibits "A-B", inclusive. cc: Brad Buron, Maintenance Superintendent r:~agdrpt\95\ 1128\tr227163 .sts RESOLUTION NO. 95- A RESOLUTION OF ~ CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA,' ACCEFrING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO THECITY-MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM (WIT!tIN TRACT NO. 22716-3) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMF_L'XILA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, Tayco (Joint Venture of Taylor Woodrow Homes & Costain Homes, Inc. ) (Now Tayco, a California General Partnership comprised of Taylor Woodrow Homes California Limited, a California Corporation, and Taylor Woodrow Real Estate, a California Corporation), offered for dedication to the County of Riverside certain streets within Tract No. 22716-3, for public street and public utility purposes, and said County of Riverside accepted said offers of dedication by Board of Supervisors action on October 26, 1989. WIIEREAS, The City of Temecula-became successors-in-interest to the County of Riverside upon incorporation, effective December 1, 1989. WltEREAS, Tayeo (Joint Venture of Taylor Woodrow Homes & Costain Homes, Inc.)(Now Tayco, a California General Partnership comprised of Taylor Woodrow Homes California Limited, a California Corporation, and Taylor Woodrow Real Estate, a California Corporation) has improved to City standards, public improvements within the several streets offered for dedication within Tract No. 22716-3, the legal descriptions of which are set forth in Exhibit "A" and are depicted in Exhibit "B" . ' WHEREAS, the City desires to accept into the City-maintained street system the public improvements within all or portions of the public streets offered to and accepted by the County of Riverside as depicted in Exhibit "B" ; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Temecula as follows: Section 1. That the City of Temecula accept into the City-maintained street system those streets or portions of public streets offered to and accep~ by the County of Riverside described in Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto. Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution and accept the streets and portions thereof, offered to and accepted by the County of Riverside, into the City- maintained street system as described in Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOFrED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 281h day of November, 1995. r:\agd rpfi95X 1128Xtr227163 .sts Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor ATTEST: June S. Greek City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 95- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 281h day of November, 1995, by the following vote: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCKIIZEMBERS: ABSENT: - COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: - COUNCILMEMBERS: r:\agdrpt\95\ 1128\tr227163 .sts EXHIBIT "A" TO RESOLIYTION NO. 95- Accepting the public streets offered to and accepted by the County of Riverside as indicated on Tracts No. 22716-3, and accepting subject public streets into the City Maintained-Street System as described below: Those lots described as Lots nan through "C" inclusive, as shown on Tract No. 22716-3, f'ded 26 October 1989, in Book 208 of Maps, Pgs 82-86. further described as follows: (lOt "A") (Lot "B") (Lot "C") Via Asturias Corte Soledad Corte Amalia r:\agdrpt\95\1128~tr227163 .sts EXHIBIT "B" TO RESOLUTION NO. 95- SUBJECT ACCEPTANCE- PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY-MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM AS INDICATED BELOW: T STRF_L:'TS OR PORTZONS OF TO BE ACCF-I~t'P--D INTO C~"Y- MAINTAIHF_D STREET SYSTEM F////////////////j · ~'/,fz'4 ,eo4~ NO SCALE ITEM 17 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer November 28, 1995 SUBJECT: Final Tract Map No. 24131-3 (located westerly of Meadows Parkway, between McCabe Drive and Leena Way) PREPARED BY:~ Steven W. Cresswell, Principal Engineer - Land Development Jim D. Faul, Assistant Engineer RECOMMEN DATI ON: That the City Council approve Final Tract Map No. 24131-3 subject to the Conditions of Approval. BACKGROUND: Tentative Vesting Tract No. 241 31 Amendment No. I was approved by the Riverside County Board of Supervisors on May 23, 1989. Tentative Tract No. 24131 was granted an extension of time by the "Restatement and Amendment of Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Temucula, Bedford Development Company, and Mesa Homes (Park Fees)" recorded February 18, 1993. The Developer has met all of the applicable Conditions of Approval. Final Tract No. 24131-3 contains 92 residential lots within 18.95 gross acres. The tract is located westerly of Meadows Parkway, between McCabe Drive and Leena Way. This tract is part of the Meadows Specific Plan (County approved SP219) and County of Riverside Development Agreement No. 4. The applicant is Kemper Real Estate Development Company (KRDC), Inc. The following fees have been paid for Final Vesting Tract Map No. 24131-3: Stephen's K-Rat Fee (paid for entire Tentative Map) $205,530.00 The following fees have been deferred for Final Vesting Tract Map No. 24131-3: Public Facilities Fee Signal Mitigation Fee (bond on file) Fire Mitigation Fee (bond on file) Due prior to Building Permit Due prior to Building Permit Due prior to Building Permit - 1 - r:\agdrpt~95\1128\24131-3 .map The parkland dedication requirement (Quimby) has been satisfied pursuant to the Amendment of "Restatement and Amendment of Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Temecula, KRDC, Inc. (formerly Bedford Development Company) and Mesa Homes (Park Fees)", which was approved by City Council on December 8, 1992. Among other things, this Development Agreement provides for the granting of several improved parks to the City. The following bonds have been posted for Final Tract Map No. 24131-3: Faithful Labor & Performance Material Subdivision Monument Street and Drainage Water Sewer Survey Monuments $389,000 $194,500 $132,000 $66,000 $128,500 $64,250 In addition, the following bonds have been posted improvements for Final Tract Map No. 24131-3: $22,000 for the associated infrastructure Faithful Labor & Performance Material Street and Drainage $401,500 $200,750 Water $142,000 $71 ~000 Sewer $52,500 $26,250 FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: 2. 3.- 4. Development Fee Checklist Location Map Copy of Sheet 2 of Tract Map 24131-3 Fees and Securities Report -2- r:\agdrpt\95\1128\24131-3 .map CITY OF TEMECULA DEVELOPMENT FEE CHECKLIST Final Tract Mao No,. 24131-3 The following fees were reviewed by Staff relative to their applicability to this project, Feq Habitat Conservation Plan (K-Rat) Parks and Recreation (Quimby Fees) Traffic Signal Mitigation Public Facility Fire Mitigation Flood Control (ADP) Condition of Approval Condition No. 26(b) See Staff Report See Road Department Letter dated 4-14-89 Pursuant to Development Agreement No, 4 See Fire Department Letter dated 2-27-89 Exempt per RCFC&WCD letter dated 9-17-93 -3- r:\agdrpt\95~ 1128\24131-3 .map ,4 'i CITY OF TEMECULA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT TRACT MAP NO. 24131-3 DATE: November 28, 1995 IMPROVEMENTS FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE MATERIAL & LABOR SECURITY SECURITY Street and Drainage * $ 790,500 $ 395,250 Water * $ 274,000 $ 137,000 Sewer * $ 181,000 $ 90,500 TOTAL $ 1,245,500 $ 622,750 this bond amount includes the associated infrastructure improvements for Final Tract Map No. 24131-3 (see page 2 of Staff Report for breakdown of improvements) Monument Security $22,000 DEVELOPMENT FEES City Traffic Signing and Striping Costs N/A RCFCD Drainage Fee (out of fee area per letter from RCFC&WCD) N/A Fire Mitigation Fee (Agreement &Bond on file) $ T.B.D.** Signal Mitigation Fee (Agreement &Bond On file) $ T.BoD. * * Road and Bridge Benefit Fee N/A Other Development Fees $ T.B.D * * SERVICE FEES Planning Fee · Comprehensive Transportation Plan Plan Check Fee Inspection Fee Monument Inspection Fee Letter of Map Revision (LOMR Review) Fees Paid to Date (City) Balance of Fees Due N/A $ 1,100.00 N/A $ 1,100.00 $ 0.00 * * T.B.D. - To be determined * * * fees paid to County of Riverside prior to City incorporation - -4- r:\agdrpt~95~1128~24131-3 .map ITEM 18 APPROVAL [~ CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE DIREC v CITY MANAGE i. CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer November 28, 1995 SUBJECT: Exchange of Real Property between the City of Temecula and the New Community Lutheran Church - Missouri Synod PREPARED BY: (~Jim D. Faul, Assistant Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council DIRECT the City Attorney to review the escrow instructions and when satsifactory, the Mayor to sign the Grant Deed to convey the City property to the New Community Lutheran Church - Missouri Synod. BACKGROUND: On June 8, 1993, the City Council approved the "Settlement of Claim and Release between the City of Temecula and New Community Lutheran Church and the Pacific Southwest District - Lutheran Church Missouri Synod (CHURCH)." As part of the settlement, the City property, located on the north side of Pauba Road between La Primavera Street and Showalter Road, will be exchanged for the CHURCH property, located at the southeast corner of Santiago Road and Ynez Road. The CHURCH has entered into an escrow with Spring Mountain Escrow Corporation through which the land transfer will occur. On November 17, 1995, the New Community Lutheran Church provided the escrow instructions to 'Staff and requested that this item be placed on the City Council Agenda for your consideration at this time. FISCAL IMPACT: none. Attachments: 1. Escrow Instructions dated August 1, 1994. 2. Settlement Agreement between the City of Temecula and the New Community Lutheran Church - Missouri Synod dated July 13, 1993. r:~agdrpt\gS\1128\parkview.doc 2. 3. 4. 7. 8. 12, 13. 14. 18, 17, 19. 20. 21. 22. 24, 25. 26. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34, 35. 36. 37, 38, 39. 40. 41. 42° 43. ~ 44, 4,5. 48. 47. 48. 49 50. 51. 52. 53. 54. 55, 56. 57, 58. 59. 60, 61. 62, 63, 64. 68. 70. T SSI I{ING MOUNTAIN ESCRO¼z Escrow Date 54J5-SK Aug. 1, Page I EXCIIANGE ESCROW INSTRUCTION:; 's't): Spring Mountain Escrow Corp. Temecula Branch 41530 Enterprise Cir. So. ~120 Temecula, CA 92590 Telephone: (909) 6?6-305o Fax: (909)676-2713 Escrow Officer: MEMO BOX/VALUATION TAB[,E: I'ROPF. R'rY "A" I'ROPERTY "B" EXCHANGE EQUITY $5m),000.O0 S500,000.00 TOTAL CONSIDERATION S5[)0,000.00 $500,000.00' For the purpose of effect. ing an exchange of equities of tile real properties herei,lafter described, the parties hereto agree to exchange their respective properties for and in consideration of tile mutual covenants and agreements ]|ereinafter contained and upon the terms and conditions set forth ill this agreement. h ~ew--C-o-~,.~,'l,.I L,~j~I-k{re~,< C.(~orcl,- Old/./. The Parties hereto being Lutheran Church Extension Fund - Hissouri Synod, hereinafter referred to as "FIRST PARTY" and City of Temecula Isereinafter referred to as "SECOND PARTY ". The property which FIRST PARTY is to convey and which SECOND PARTY is to acquire in titis ?exchahge is hereinafter referred to as PROPERTY "A" and is described as follows: PARCEL 1 AS SHOWN BY'PARCEl, MAP 14078 ON FILE IN BOOK 80 ['AGES 66 AND 67 OF PAR, .PS, IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNT. y oF RIVERSIDE, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALI[ a. CO~EY~CE OF TITLE: 'FIle Deed to FIRS']' PROPERTY ks to be made to: CITY OF TEMECULA, A CAI,IF'~ItF~I A nIJNJC] PAl, ('OI{POR~TION The property which SECOND PARTY is [o convey and which FIRST PARTY?is' exciiange is i,ereinaiter telerred to as PROPERTY "B" and is described as follows: THaT PORTION bF THE RANCHO TEHECULA, IN TIlE CITY OF TEHECULA OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS GRANTEl) BY THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICAN TO LgI8 VIGNE8 BY PATENT DATED J~NUARY 18, 1860, AND AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOM ] PAGE 3~ OF PATENTS, RECORDS OF SAN DIEGO qOUNTY, CALIFORNIA, LYING SOUTHERLY OF RANCHO VISTA ROAD, NORTHERLY OF PAUBA ROAD, WE~'I'ERLY OF HARGARITA ROAD AND EASTERLY OF TIIAT CERTAIN ,PARCEL CONVEYED BY DEED RECORDEU DECEHBER 13, 1967, AS IN~TRUHENT NO, 109720 OF OFFICIAL RECORD8 OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA; EXCEPTIN~ THEREFROM TUAT PORTION Tt{ERI~F CONVEYED TO TIlE RANClIO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT; A~80 EXCEPTING THEREFROM 'I'I{AT PORTION TIIEREOF CONVEYED TO 'File COUNTY OF ~IVERSI{H~ ~BHALF OF COUNTY SERVICE AREA NU. 143 BY I)OCIJHENT RECORi]ED AUGUST 5, 1988, ~S [NS'r~UHE~7 NO. 231290 OF OFFICIAL RF;{:I~RD~ O[.' RIVE{{~;IUE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA; A580 EXCEPTING TI{EREFRnH ']',I,VI' I'ORTION TiIEREOF CONVEYED TO THE COUNTY OF DOCUMENT RECORDE{) SI:{'I'E~IIIEI{ 9, 19HS, AS ]N~ITRUHENT NO. 260424 OF OFFICIAL RECORD:: ~F RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALiFORN] A. ** Property'"B" is subject to lili~g ol' a subdivision.map duFing escrow by the Ci' of Temecula in wl~icb a parcel containing no less than 7.72 buildable acres shall established and shall be referred to wi~llin ~hese instructions as Proper~y 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 8. 10. 11. 12. 13. 15. 16. 17. 18. i9. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 33. 34. 35. i3 SPRI'NG MOUNTAIN ESCROW Escrow No. Date 5415-SK Aug. ], ['age 2 I q q -1 CON~/EYANCE OF TITLE: The Deed to SECOND PROI'EIUI'Y i:; to be made to: LUTHERAN CHURCII EXTENSION FUND - MISSOURI SYNOD, A MISSOURI NOT FOR PROFIT · be properties described above are to be conveyed subject only to time following: 1. 2rid Half Current General and Spec~aJ Taxes (or LIme fiscal year 1994/95. 'Is. A lien o~ supplemental taxes, if any, assessed pursuant to LIme provisions ol L'hapte 498, 1983 Statutes of the State nf CaJ. i[ornja. Z. Assessments and bonds, n,mt del]nqueut, having all unpaid balance o~ NONE 3. Easements, Rights ot Way, Covenallts, Conditions, Rest. fictions & Reservations Eecord. or in deed to record. YoQ are to record any instrmunelmt called for in this escrow when you can obtain a I'olicy of:Title I~surance {r,,m Fi,~;i A,,,+rkcau Title ]nsmmral~ce on each subject properly, CoBraining the printed excelH. iomms usual in such policy with a liability oE S500,000.00. Escrow holder is to prepare a "Preliminary Chum,fie of Ownership Report" o]1 each property, iB accordance with time instructions contained herein, and is to deliver same to each grantee ~or execution. Escrow ho].der is authorized amid instructed to charge each part)' .825.00 ~or preparation of same. At time close uf escrow, escrow bolder shall deliver said reports to tire Cornmary Recorder, a)on9 with time Grant Deed conveying title to same. 2This escrow is contingent upon each party's own investigation that the property LIme}' are .acqUiring by means of exchange through this escrow is geologically sound and free '~oxic wastes and suitable ~or coustrucLion. Deposit of closing funds by each party :8)all 'be deemed removal o~ this contingency. · ..~' :i ' 'T~is escrow is contingent upon First I'arLy (Church) obtaining approval of its Pub)-ic Use ;Permit (P.U.P) for the cousLruction of a t'huFch. 36. The First Party and LiNe Second l'arty :;hall each hear one hale (1/2) of tile costs amid 37. .fees incurred in connection with timis escrow, inchreclinE, but not limited to, time 3/]. ;following: escrow fee, C[,TA policy o[' t. itLe jmm:;mlrammce, document. ary transfer tax ]n the 39. ,iamount of S505.00 on each tramms[er of property, and drawing and recording of documexmts. 40. Each party shall bear its o~-n legal lees. 41. 42. PRORATE AND/OR ADJUST THE POM,OWING ON BOTH I'ROPERTIES AS OF THE CLOSE OF ESCROW: 43. 44. 1. Taxes sINai] be prorated lot oath ,}t' Li~e I,am'cels herejn based on LIme amount ,,f the 45. last tax statement o~ the Tax ColJector. AIm taxes which are payable prior to the close 46. . Of escrow shall be paid by Grantor ot such parcel and shall be l, rorated accordingly. 47. . . 48.: ':~ ~A {~ER OF ~CORD ONLY WIT]I WI!ICI{ ESCI~()H IIOLDHR IS NOT TO DE CONCERNED, LIABLE 49. ~/OR RESPONSIBLE. TIlE PARTIES }IERETO HAVE ENTERED INTO CURTAIN AGREEHUNTS HIIICI{ ARE 50. OUTSIDE THE SCOPE OF T!IBSE INSTRUCTION}I, BUT HIIICI{ TIIEY WISH STATgD HEREIN FOR 'rl{g 51. UCOU, AS FOLLOWS: 52. 53. 54. 55. 56. 57. 58. 59. 60. 61. 62. 63. 64. 85. 67. 68. 69, 70. 'The parties have executed an agreement known as "Settlement of Claim and Release between tile City of Temecula amid New Commmlnity Lutheram~ Cllurcim amid TIme Pacific Southwes~ District - Lutheran Chtmrch Hissouri Synod." These instructions are not intended to · cancel, supersede or modiJy limp l,H'ms c+[ said agreement, insofar as said agreerecruit relates to matters not actually I,-rtinelmt to time escrow instructions, such as, but not limited to, the release o{ 1cOal claim.,~;, time grading of property, utilities and street improvements. EN)) OF MEMORANDUM NOTICE: TiNis escrow shall a. de(:.me,) ol,en Nipoil time {late ILlme escrow hohler is imm receipt of executed escrow imm!;rru,:l i,,mms from huyer alld seller. [Jlltil execnted escrow instructions from buyer and :;elleN' are re,':eived, the I>am'ties acknowledge timat holder, is merely a depositom-y ageilL and that all documents aud/or funds will be returned tO the parties upon a unilateral request by the party dellsiting same. 1. 2. 3. 4. 6. 7.. 8. 10. 11. '12. 1.3. 14. ~:5.. 18. i 1T.: 1'~.. ~'i'. 22. } ".Z.-SPRING MOUNTAIN ESCRO\ Escrow No Date 5415-SK Aug. 1, 1991 Page 3 eXf · Time is of the essence i,l these jnstr.ctions. This escrow sitall close on or befoz'e Janhary 30, 1995, and is contingent .port the :;.ccessful completion ot all transtecs reterred to in this transactiou subject to the terms o[ this Exchange Agreement. :~[~}tes agree that regardless of date instruct:ions are delivered into escrow, upon '.~C~ipt Of same the closing date shall ['email~ as set out on page ] of these ' ~ructions. ~p~p such opening date, parties are aware and a<jree this escrow shall not be cancelled a~d:i.~o funds will be released u.ti] such time as escro~ agent has received executed ~:~:]f~:cellatton instructions ~rom all parties. ':~'~a~l~le no notice, demand, or change of instructions shall be of any effect unless ". ~; , . . . . . · ?l~ ~ltt~9 alid approved In writing by a]I pal ties affected by same. ~ "'~e~in9 of escrow" is tile date escrow holder receives executed instructions trom g; principals. In the absence of receipt of execnted instructions from all parties and ~{}q;~e sole discretion of escrow holder, escrow hohler is instructed to return all j ~'~e~tn~twe~ty (20) days from tile date of deposit including monies to the appropriate ~{ies. On real estate transactions, the "close of escrow" is defined as the date o{uments'are recorded with the to,sty recorder. For other types of transactions, 2S' ~cl~se o~escro~" is defined as the date on which all co.ditions and contingencies have 24. "b~'F met a~d satisfied. I~ the dose of egc'rt}w has not occttrred at tile time ~ 2~ ' ':' 0 ' · . . . · ...... ' pro · gthese Instructions escrow holde~ I~ :'::~i; .~ ..':.%posSible ~less escrow hohler receives nuthal written instructlolls cancelling tile .'~s~ro~. All prorations are based on a thirty (30) day month and are made as of the {late .. ;'., .. . . , , .;..:. · ..: · .. , : . · .... -.,.' {' ~i~elpalS. The principals acknowledge escrow hohler has not made any represents -.,:< {;{~din9 {~is transaction or the property; has not provided any legal or tax adv · ,,g.~, i~' oilered any interpretations or positions on le~al or tax matters. ~:~.,.- .. '~ · ' : r; q · 'he sufficiency, validity, and/or · ~ ~row holder is authorized tn nti lize the services or a sub-escrow agent as a -".~.t~mittal or check [rom funds on del,u~;it for the party requesting the service. In ~' ~:Or~er to transmit funds by Federal Wire, esero~ hohler is hlstructed to disburse ~unds 48. Vtojt~pring Mountain Group "GPRING HOUNTAIN G~OUP WIRE TRANSFER ACCOUNT" with wiring 49. ~:instructions in order to facilitate the wire request. The principals acknowledge that 50. ~fu~ds deposited into the escrow file are held jn a lion- hirerest bearing escrow trust 51. lardoust' 52. 53. .All documents and checks will he forwarded via First Class Nail. If requested to use 54. , ~anotber delivery service. escrow holder is instructed to pay the charges assessed by 55..~;;esbrol holder from tile-~unds on deposit. gscruw holder is authorized to pay an escrow 56.: .~.~. '::i~e at its ~7. ~ and all charges f~om ~unds on deposit in ti~e escrow file. Should escrow holder .' .~ ', sole d~scretion, that it is nece~;sary to incur extraordinary charges 59...,. 60. ::Escrow holder is authorized to accept ot'lgjzla,l counterpart escrow instr.ctions, 61. ~amendments and other documents. ~11 co,nterparts together shall constitute olle and tile' 62. '~same document. Escrow holder is jnstr.cted to make available copies o[ all documents to 63. '{the prlnclpal's real estate broker agent attorney or lender. 64. :; , , qS. '~if.:'requested by the escl'e, holder, Lhe I~rjncipals agree to uccept tile written 66. ::tre'iignation oI escro~ holde~ a,d to cancel the escrow. I~ instructions to ca.col th 67. · ' . 68. escrow are not received within {eft (10) days of request, then escro~ hohler may lesion 69. 70. 2. 3. 4. 5. -~. '8. 9. 10. '12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29, 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 39. 40. 41. 42. 43. 45. 46. 47. 48. 49. 50, 51. 52. 53. 54. 55. 56. 57. 58. 59. 60. 62. 63. 64. 65. 66. 67. 68. 69. 70. i SPRING MOUNTAIN ESCROW Escrow No Dine 5415-SK Aug. 1.19qt Page 4 and interplead the fnnds and rlor~mlments with a con[t of competent jurisdiction. If thp escrow holder receives instx'mmctions to cancel tile file; if escrow holder resigns; or if the file cancels in any other manner, timel} the principals irrevocably authorize escrow holder to deduct a cancellation lee from time fnnds on deposit and to disbt, rse any remai~ing funds pursuant to time i,tstructions of the principals. In addition to any other le~s and costs, the principals johatly and severally that, i{ escrow holder is required to hold tnnds on deposit for more than 90 days the e~tlmated closinq date, or a~ter {=lie date [nnds and documents are d~posi[ed whi~h$ver'i~ later, whether or not time escrow tile has closed or cancelled, then escrow holder Is irrevocably authorized to deduct and pay to escrow {molder on the first of each s~sequent month, a "hold open" fee of S75.00 per month from funds on deposit in time escrow. The principals irrevocably instruct escro~ holder to cancel and close the escro~ file when all funds on deposit have been disbursed. The principals to this escrow, jointly and s~ve['ally, promise to indemnify and e{~ro~ holder harmless from a]I tees, exl~enses, obligations and liabilities which escrow holder may incur or suf{er directly or hxdirectly. either before or after tile clo~{e ~aa~ellation o{ the escrow file. The principals to the escrow, jointly and severally. praise to pay on demand all fees and costs jncurred or suffered by escrow holder dl[ectly or indirectly, either before ox' atter the close or cancellation ol the escrow file including, but not limj r. ed to, admjnistrative amid governmental costs, damages, a~ards, jud~ements, audit and le~a] fees, litigation costs, arbitration charges, in~ludinq, but not ljmited to attorney's fees and costs before trial, at trial, on appeal or for collection. Escrow holder does not agree to submit to arbitration or any other alternative dispute resolution method. 8prinQ ~ou~tain Escrow Corporation has b~em{ issued an escrow aqent's license by r.h~ Cali{ornia Department of Corporations. L~AN CHURCH BXT~SION FUND - MISSOURI SYNOD, A MISSOURI NOT FOR PROFIT CORPORATION BY; City of Temecula BY: SECOND PARTY SIGNATURES CITY OF TEHECULA, A CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION BY: SETTLEMENT OF CLAIM AND RELEASE BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND NEW COMMUNITY LUTHERAN CHURCH AND THE PACIFIC SOUTHWEST DISTRICT - LUTHERAN CHURCH MISSOURI SYNOD [LUTHERAN CHURCH EXTENSION FUND] This Settlement and Claim and Release Agreement ("Agreement") is by and between the City of Temecula ("City") and New Community Lutheran Church ("Church") and the Lutheran Church Extension Fund - Missouri Synod ("LCEF") and shall become effective only when executed by all parties hereto and when formally approved by the City Council at a duly noticed meeting of the Council. BACKGROUND INFORMATION The real property (Lot 86") which is subject matter of this Agreement is property located in Riverside County in the City of Temecula at the southeast corner of Santiago and Ynez Road ("Church Land"). The title holder to Lot 86 is LCEF. LCEF and Church have an agreement to enable Church to purchase the land from LCEF to enable Church to erect worship facilities thereon. During 1992, Church applied to City for a public use permit ("PUP") to erect certain worship facilities on Lot 86. On September 21, 1992, the City of Temecula Planning Commission ("Commission") considered the Church's PUP Lot 86 and denied the same. Thereafter, the Church appealed the decision of the Commission to the City Council ("City Council") of the City of Temecula. On November 19, 1992, the City Council denied the Church's appeal. The Church believes that both the denial of their PUP application for Lot 86 and the manner in which their PUP application was denied by the Commission and Council violated their constitutional and other legal rights and that the Church has suffered monetary damage as a result of those violations. The City disputes these allegations. The City and the Church have met in an attempt to resolve the dispute between themselves and have agreed upon a land exchange (the "Exchange") as a compromised settlement of all claims which is memorialized by this Agreement. 58388.2 - 1 - " 1. LOCATION OF LAND TO BE EXCHANGED. Church Land: Land, free of encumbrances, located at the southeast corner of Santiago and Ynez Road which City is receiving from Church in this Land Exchange ("Church Land"). More particularly described in Exhibit A hereto.) City Land: Buildable land, free of encumbrances, acceptable to Church, located south and adjacent to PaUba Road and west of the existing City of Temecula Sports Park which Church is receiving from City in this land Exchange (City Land"). (More particularly described in Exhibit B hereto.) 2. ESCROW OF LAND TO BE EXCHANGED. As soon as reasonably possible, the parties will open an escrow (the "Escrow") at Rosewood Escrow, providing that the parties will exchange the City Land for the Church Land. The Church will receive comparable buildable City Land from the City in an amount not less than Church's current buildable Church Land, i.e., 7.72 acres. The City Land shall include the surrounding slopes. The instructions for said escrow shall contain provisions which reasonably require the parties to obtain title insurance (each party at its own cost), pro-rate property taxes (if any) as of date of close of escrow, and to assure themselves that the property exchanged is geologically sound and free of toxic wastes and suitable for construction. The Escrow shall close upon the earlier of: (a) the Church's receipt of approval of its P.U.P. application (and satisfaction of all other preconditions of escrow); or (b) expiration of 180 days from .opening of escrow unless extended by mutual agreement of the parties, which agreement shall not be unreasonably withheld. 3. UTILITY CONNECTIONS. Church agrees that it will bear all costs necessary to bring all utilities to the site of the City Land being exchanged with the Church at no cost to the City. 4. STREET IMPROVEMENTS. Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for any building on the City Land, Church shall design, widen and construct Pauba Road to four lanes, plus curb, gutter and sidewalk on the north-side of the street, from Primavera Road west to'the City Land. The Church shall pay all.engineering, design, grading, permit, and construction costs, provided that the City, at its cost, shall rough grade Pauba Road concurrently with rough grading the City Land. As a condition to the closing of the EscrOW, Church shall provide the City with City approved rough grading plans for Pauba Road prior to the close of the Escrow. 5. COSTS & FEES INCURRED IN EXCHANGE. City and Church shall each bear one-half (1/2) of the Escrow costs and fees incurred in connection with the Exchange. Each party shall bear its own legal fees. 6. ZONE CHANGE AND PUBLIC USE PERMIT. Prior to and as a condition of the close of Escrow, the Church shall obtain necessary Land use entitlement for the City Land, for construction of a Church on the City Land. Church shall be free at any time to apply for a zoning classification which will allow uses other than or in addition to a church use. The City is under no obligation to approve any land use applications, and the Church is not obligated to authorize the closing of Escrow until it receives land use entitlement satisfactory to the Church. City staff shall make its best efforts to process Church's P.U.P. application in an expedient manner. Church believes and City has represented that the only land use entitlement necessary for construction of Church's planned church buildings shall be a P.U.P. Church, shall have the option to cancel escrow if it is determined that land use entitlements other than a P.U.P. shall be required. If the Church does not receive satisfactory land use entitlements within 180 days of the opening of Escrow, the Escrow and this Agreement shall terminate unless the parties agree to extend the escrow beyond 180 days which agreement shall not be unreasonably withheld. 7. GRADING OF CiTY LAND FOR CHURCH USE. Prior to the close of escrow, City shall prepare a plan to rough grade the City Land into a 7.72 buildable site. City agrees that within one hundred and eighty (180) days after closing of the escrow, approval of land use entitlement for worship facilities on the City Land in a form acceptable to the Church, and delivery of approved grading plans for Pauba Road, whichever occurs last, City shall complete rough grade and compact the City Land in accordance with the Building Code of the City of Temecula. City agrees that it shall bear all said costs of rough grading and related compaction (if any) of the City Land incurred in yielding a buildable pad of not less than 7.72 acres. Church should bear the responsibility of its own cost, for preparing site for construction and site preparation beyond the rough grading stage. 5a388. z - 3 - 8. ExtensiOn of Tentative Tract MaD No. . As a condition of the close of escrow, Church shall apply for and obtain an extension of Tentative Tract Map No. for the Church land. CHURCH'S RELEASE OF PENDING/IMMINENT LEGAL CLAIMS CONDITIONED. Conditioned upon the closing of Escrow and the approval of Land Use entitlement for the Church's worship facilities on the City Land, Church agrees as follows: D e Church and LCEF and their owners, partners, officers, agents, employees, members, assigns and successors-in- interest, release City from any and all rights, claims, demands, and damages of any kind, known or unknown~ asserted or unasserted, existing or arising on or before the date of execution of this Agreement and resulting from or related to the conditions or the allegations of the tort claim which the Church and LCEF filed with the City on or about February 9, 1993, which is attached as Exhibit D hereto. Church and LCEF understand and agree that all of their rights under Section 1542 of the Civil Code of California or any similar law of any state or territory-of the United States are hereby expressly waived. Said section reads as follows: "Section 1542. General Release - Claims Extinguished. A general release does not extend to claims which the creditor does not know or suspect to exist in his favor at the time of executing the release, which, if known by him, must have materially affected his settlement with the debtor." It is understood and agreed that this Agreement represents settlement of disputed claims and is notto be construed as representing an admission of liability on behalf of any party to this Agreement. The parties, however, intend to buy their peace and to forever provide a full and complete release and discharge from any and all liability arising out of the transactions, matters, and events more particularly identified hereinabove. Parties expressly warrant, represent and agree that in executing this Agreement, they do so with full knowledge of any rights which they have or may have with respect to this Agreement and with respect to the hereinabove referenced claim. The parties acknowledge that after entering into this Agreement, they may discover different or additional facts concerning the subject matter of this Release or their understanding of those facts. The parties therefore, expressly assume the risk of such facts being so different and agree that this Agreement shall, in all respects, be effective and not subject to rescission, cancellation or termination by reason of any such additional or different facts. ATTORNEY FEES/COSTS INCURRED IN REGARD TO ENFORCEMENT OF THIS AGREEMENT. Should any party thereto employ an attorney for the purpose of enforcing or construing this Agreement, or any judgment based on this Agreement in any legal proceeding whatsoever, including; insolvency, bankruptcy, arbitration, declaratory relief, or other litigation, including appeals or rehearings, the prevailing party shall be entitled to receive from the other party reimbursement for all attorney's fees and costs, including, but not limited to, service of process, filing fees, court and court reporter costs, investigative costs, expert witness fees, and the cost of any bond whether taxable or not. Should any judgment or final order be issued in that proceeding, such reimbursement shall be specified therein. The "prevailing party" means that party determined by the court to most nearly prevail, and not necessarily the one in whose favor a judgment is granted. 11. CONSTRUCTION OF TERMS. This Agreement and the terms thereof shall be constructed and enforced in accordance with the Laws of the State of California. 12. BINDING ON SUCCESSORS. All the terms of this Agreement shall be binding upon, and inure to the benefit of, and be enforceable by, the parties hereto and their respective legal representatives, successors and assignees. 13. EXECUTION OF ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS. The parties hereto agree to execute such additional documents as may be reasonably necessary or appropriate to implement the terms and provisions of this Agreement. 14. COUNTERPARTS. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which so executed shall be deemed an original; and such counterparts shall together constitute but one Agreement. 58388.2 -- 5 -- IN 'WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto set their hand the day and year set forth opposite each party respective name. CHURCH DATED: 7- ~ , 1993 By: DATED: 7 - % , 1993 ~N~t Orgahiz~/ti~n LCEF By: 'f 7~ ~ Missouri Synod, a Non-Profit Organization CITY DATED: ~°/$ , 1993 By: GifrMaaY~~fthe ATTEST" Scott F. Field City Attorney F Z -6- ITEM 19 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE DIREC CITY MANAGE CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Manager/City Council r,.Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer November 28, 1995 Award a C~ntract to Reconstruct Three (3) Desilting Ponds in the Santiago Channel from Vallejo Avenue to John Warner Road PREPARED BY: ~i~Brad Buron, Maintenance Superintendent RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council award a contract for construction of three (3) desilting ponds in Santiago Channel to Monteleone Excavating, the lowest responsible bidder, for the sum of $11,550.00. BACKGROUND: In November, 1995 tlie Public Works Department in conformance with the City's current purchasing procedures requested proposals for Public Works Project. Only one sealed bid was received for the following scope of work: Construct three (3) desilting ponds per detail "A" at the following locations (See Detail "B"). The bid received is as follows: Monteleone's Excavating, Murrieta $11,550.00 Monteleone Excavating has performed contract work in the past for the City of Temecula, and we have found their work to be satisfactory. The costs are within the Engineer's estimate. The property owner, through the Right of Entry Agreement, allows the desilting ponds to be constructed each fall with the understanding that each spring the property will be returned to a natural state. The construction of the basins prevents large quantities of silt from entering the Vallejo Channel and causing a significant maintenance problem. The installation and removal of the desiltation ponds is more cost effective method of controlling downstream problems. r:~agdtpt\95~1128Ndamwl.bid/ajp FISCAL IMPACT: Funds are available in the Public Works Department Drainage Facilities account 100-164-601 - 5401 for the propostgd work at Santiago Channel. · Attachments: 1. Detail "A" 2. Detail"B" 3. Work Order//95-96-14 r:NagdrptX95X1128~hannel.bid/ajp DE'~AIL 'Au 2' BELOW ELEVATION OF SANTIAGO ROAD I ~ I' WIN. , , ~ -- ''._~,_""'_2- 'T" 'E COMPACTED ~"'- ~ "-.~,-~" ·',LACED o. ' A Ol~P,'rOR FAC; OF DAM OVi~l PLASTIC 6 COURSES HIGH (FIRST 2 COURSES TO BE BURIED) SECTION' T~ROUGH EMBANKMENT · NOT T--D SCALE D~"['AIL BB {:1 t/ SECTION D-D NOT TO 5C-"LE TYPICAL DESILTING DAM DETAIL · ..' ... ~m } 7.5 MINUTE . '~87 ,'L CALIFORNIA -' SERIES (TOPOGRAPHIC) I1 730 OO0 FEET 117°07'30" 33 °30' - .:.::..~:,: 3706 ~;- DETAIL "B:' DETENTION FACILITY LOCATION 480 000 ~ v~' 3704 'v"- -- / VICINITY MAP City of Temecula Public Works Department WORK ORDER REQUEST Street Maintenance DATE: November 1, 1995 JOB ~95-96-14 BID OPENING DATE: November 8, 1995 Deliver to:. City Ha!l, 43174 Business Park Dr., City Clerks Office no later than 2:30 p.m. LOCATION: Santiago Road between John Wamer Road and Vallejo Avenue (See Attached Vicinty Map) SCOPE OF WORK INVOLVED: Construct three (3) desilting ponds. per attached detail, Using existing material in channel · Delete energy dissipator rip-rap Reminder: AH projects require Certified Payroll CONTRACTOR PREPARED BY: MONTELEONE EXC. PLEASE PRINT TOTAL PRICE: CITY APPROVED BY: $ 11,550.00 ~,dJ._~.~f elevn-thousand-five hundred and fifty/00 (written mount - Ple~ spell out) r. ~n~ntX96workor%wkoglfn~ 14tajp CITY OFTEMF_CULA BID OPENING LOG SYIF~ET - 10. CC: City Clerk's Staff (3) Initiating Department (1) City Manager (1) 3 2'~forus~bids~-OlO ITEM 20 APPROVAL~ CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFIC CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Manager/City Council Genie Roberts, Director of Finance November 28, 1995 Community Services Funding Requests RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the ad hoc subcommittee's recommendation for Community Services Funding requests by Temecula Valley National Little League (TVNLL) in the amount of $2,500 and TEAM Community Pantry in the amount of $5,000. DISCUSSION: At the meeting of September 12, 1995the City Council approved funding to 17 local organizations for Community Services Funding requests in the amount of $92,500. After committee review by Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans and Councilmember Birdsall the recommendations were taken to council. Since then, two additional applications have been received. At the November 14, 1995 City Council meeting the council reappointed the ad hoc subcommittee. The committee is recommending that the organizations receive funding as outlined below: NAME Temecula Valley National Little League PROGRAM Baseball & softball player scholarships AMT AMT REQUESTED RECOMMENDED $2,500 $2,500 TEAM Community Food to $10,000 $5,000 Pantry homeless and needy persons. The TVNLL is requesting funding to be used for players' registration fees of those who would normally not be able to play due to financial reasons. The pantry is requesting funding to assist their expenses incurred by utilities, food and shelter provided to the homeless or needy. FISCAL IMPACT: The unencumbered balance in the City Council discretionary account number 001-100-999-5267 is $7,500. R:WORTONLLAGENDAS|CSFAPP2.AGN 11/02/95 ITEM 2 1 ORDINANCE NO. 95-13 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN AMENDM'F~NT AND RESTATEMENT OF THE DEVEIA3PMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND BCFCCL VENTURE NO. 1 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP and BCFCCL VENTURE NO. 2 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP FOR SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 199, PLANNING AREA 14, MARGARITA VILLAGE, PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA95-0078. WHEREAS, Section 65864 .el se~_. of the Government Code of the State of California and Temecula City Resolution No. 91-52 authorize the execution of agreements establishing and maintaining requirements applicable to the development of real property; and, WHEREAS, in accordance with the procedure specified in said Resolution, BCI/CCL VENTURE NO. 1 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP and BCUCCL VENTURE NO. 2 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a California limited partnership, hereinafter "BCI/CCL" has filed with the City of Temecula an application for a Development Agreement which reflects an amendment and re-statement of existing County Development Agreement #5 (hereinafter "this Agreement"), of a residential housing subdivision on its property for Planning Area 14 located at Tracts 23100-1 (8 lots), 23100-2 (15 lots), 23100-3 (28 lots), 23100-4 (23 lots), 23101-2 (28 lots) and 23101-3 (9 lots), hereinafter the "Subject Property" which application has been reviewed and accepted for filing by the Community Development Director; and, WHEREAS, notice of the City's intention to consider adoption of this Agreement with BCI/CCL, has been duly given in the form and manner required by law, and the Planning Commission and City Council of said City have each conducted public hearings on October 16, 1995 (Planning Commission), and November 14, 1995 (City Council) at which time it heard and considered all evidence relevant and material to said subject. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. FINDINGS. The City Council hereby finds and determines, with respect to this Agreement by and between .the City of Temecula and BCI/CCL that it: A. Is consistent with the objectives, policies, general land. uses, and programs specified in the City of Temecula's General Plan in that this Agreement makes reasonable provision for the use of certain real property for residential development consistent with the Ords\95-13 General Plan's land use designation of low-medium density residential; B. Is compatible with the uses authorized in, and the regulations prescribed for, the land use district in which the Subject Property referred to therein is located as this Agreement provides for residential development pursuant to a Specific Plan; C. Is in conformity with the public convenience, general welfare, and good land use practice because it makes reasonable provision for a balance of land uses compatible with the 'remainder of the City; D. Will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare because it provides adequate assurances for the protection thereof; E. Notice of the public hearing before the Planning Commission was published in a newspaper of general circulation at least twenty (20) days before the Planning Commission public hearing, and mailed or delivered at least twenty (20) days prior to the hearing to the project applicant and to each agency expected to provide water, sewer, schools, police protection, and fire protection, and to all property owners within six hundred feet (600')of the property as shown on the latest equalized assessment roll; F. Notice of the public hearing before the Planning Commission included the date, time, and place of the public heating, the identity of the hearing body, a general explanation of the matter to be considered, a general description in text or by diagram of the location of the real property that is the subject of the hearing, and of the need to exhaust administrative remedies; G. Notice of the public hearing before the City Council was published in a newspaper of general circulation at least ten (10) days prior to the City Council public hearing, mailed at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing to the project applicant, to each agency expected to provide water, sewer, schools, police protection, and fire protection, and to all property owners within six hundred feet (600') of the property as shown on the latest equalized assessment roll; H. Notice of the City Council heating included the date, the time, and place of the public hearing, the identity of the hearing body, the general explanation of the matter to be considered, a general description in text or by diagram of the location of the real property that is the subject of the heating, and the notice of the need to exhaust administrative remedies; I. City Council approved this Agreement by Ordinance based upon evidence and findings of the Planning Commission and new evidence presented at its heating on this Agreement, giving its reasons therefore and set forth their relationship between this Agreement and the General Plan; Ords\95-13 -2- K. The benefits that will accrue to the people of the City of Temecula from this legislation and this Agreement are as follows: Generation of municipal revenue; 1. Construction of Public infrastructure facilities; 2. Acceleration of both the timely development of subject property as well as the payment of municipal revenue; 3. Enhancement of quality of life for surrounding residents with the timely development through the elimination of dust and nuisance of partially improved lots; Payment of Public Facility, fire, library, and traffic signal mitigation fees; and, 5. Early completion of the recreation facility required of the project. Section 2. APPROVAL. This Agreement, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as Attachment '1' is hereby approved. The Mayor is authorized and directed to evidence such approval by executing this Agreement for, and in the name of, the City of Temecula; and the City Clerk is directed to attest thereto; provided, however, that this Agreement shall not be executed by the City until this Ordinance takes effect and the City has received from the applicant two executed originals of said Agreement. Section 3. SEVERABILITY. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any sentence, paragraph, or section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shah not affect the validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance. Section 4. NOTICE OF ADOPTION. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be posted as required by law. Section 5. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. The City Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance and a certified copy of the full text of this Ordinance shall be posted in the office of the City Clerk at least five days prior to the adoption of this Ordinance. Within 15 days from adoption of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance, together with the names of the Councilmembers voting for and against the Ordinance, and post the same in the office of the City Clerk. ' Ords~95-13 -3- Section 6. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 28 day of November, 1995. Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor ATfEST: June S. Greek, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMECULA I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City Of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 95-13 was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 14th day of November, 1995, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 281h day of November, by the following roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: June S. Greek, CMC City Clerk Ords\95-13 TEMECU.LA COMMUNITY SERVICES DIST.RICT ITEM 1 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT HELD NOVEMBER .14, 1995 A regular meeting of the Temecula Community Services District was called to order at 7:42 PM at the Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. President Ron Roberrs presiding. ROLL CALL PRESENT: 4 DIRECTORS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Parks, Roberrs ABSENT: 1 DIRECTORS: Stone Also present were General Manager Ronald E. Bradley, General Counsel Peter Thorson and City Clerk June S. Greek. PUBLIC COMMENTS None given. CONSENT CALENDAR It was moved by Director Parks, seconded by Director Lindemans to approve Consent Calendar Items I and 2. The motion was unanimously carried with Director Stone absent and Director Parks abstaining on Item 1.2. Minutes 1.1 Approve the minutes of October 10, 1995. 1.2 Approve the minutes of October 17, 1995. Quitclaim of Easement Within Maraarita Community Park 2.1 Accept a quitclaim deed from Eastern Municipal Water District for an easement on the Margarita Community Park Site, and authorize the City Clerk to record the document with the Riverside County Recorder's Office. GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT None given. r:\minutes.csd\l 11495 -1- City Council Minutes November 29. 1994 DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT None given. BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORT Director Birdsall stated she has received a brochure from the League of California Cities regarding the Community Services Conference in Monterey which she will be attending and encouraged the Community Services Commissioners to also attend. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Director Birdsall, seconded by Director Lindemans to adjourn at 7:44 PM to a meeting on November 28, 1995, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. The motion was unanimously carried with Director Stone absent. Ronald H. Roberrs, President ATTEST: June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk/ District Secretary r:~minutes.csd\l 11495 -2- ITEM 2 APPRO L CITY ATTORNERE~~ FINANCE OFFIC CITY MANAGE CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: . Board of Directors FROM: Ronald E. Bradley, General Manager DATE: November 28, 1995 SUBJECT: Naming of a Newly Acquired Park Site PREPARED BY: ~erman D. Parker, Deputy Director of Community Services RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors: Name the newly acquired park site "The Duck Pond". BACKGROUND: As of July 31,1995, the City of Temecula acquired the property referred to as the Duck Pond from Kemper Real Estate Development Company (KRDC). The newly acquired 7.5 acre park site is located on the southeast corner of Rancho California Road and Ynez Rd., providing the City a highly visible, centrally located park site. This park site will greatly assist the Community Services Department in meeting the passive recreation needs of the community. At the October 17, 1995 meeting of the Board of Directors, staff presented the Commission's recommendation to officially name the park site "The Duck Pond". However, in light of the recent untimely passing of the City's first City Manager, David F. Dixon, it was the desire of the Board of. Directors to recognize Mr. Dixon's contributions to our community by officially naming this park site in his honor. This item was referred back to the Community Services Commission for their consideration. At the November 13, 1995 Community Services Commission meeting, staff presented the Board of Directors recommendation, that the Commission approve naming the park site the David F. Dixon Memorial Park. The Commission discussed this issue at great length. They acknowledged the accomplishments and contributions of Mr. Dixon and support naming a city facility or amenity in his honor. However, the Commission recommended that this particular -park site be officially named "The Duck POnd", primarily because this site is a community landmark that has been referred to as "The Duck Pond" for over twenty years. A copy of Resolution No. CSD 92-08, a policy for naming parks and recreation facilities is attached for your review. The Board may approve this name or select any other name desired. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENT: Naming Policy KESOLUTION NO. CSD 92-08 A RESOLUTION OF TtIE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF 77-IE TENEECULA CONEvILrNTTY SERVICES DISTRICT ADOPTING A POLICY FOR NA2VFrNG PAIIK,q AND RECREATION FACILITIES W'lzFF~, on April 23, 1991, the Boazd of Directors (the "Board") adopted a policy for naming parks and rec?,~t~on facilities; and WKEiREAS, the Community Scrvic.~s District and the Parks and Recre. afion Commission requests that the aforementioned policy be adopted by re~otufion; NOW, TYFF~RKFORE, TYrK BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ~ TE~MZECTjLA CONIi~KJNITY SERVICES DISTRICT DOES tIEREBY, RESOLVE, DETERMINE .~ND OtLDER AS FOT-T-OWS: Section 1. That the policy for naming parks and recreation facilities as se~ forth on Exhibit "A" is adopw. d establishing a uniform policy and proc~ure that identifies criteria for the naming of parks and recreation facilities. PASSFD, A2PROVED AND ADOFTED this 8th day of September, 1992. Ronald J. Pazks, President ATFr_ST: Greek, City R:~s CZD 92-08 STATE OF CA!-I~ORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEM2ECUI~ ) I, Iune S. Gf~k, City Clerk of ~hc City of Tem~cula, tzF~-~F]qY DO CERTIFY mat foregoing R:~lu~on No. CSD 92-08 ~ duly ~dopt~ a~ ~ r:g~ m~g of ~e Ci~ Counc~ of ~e Ci? of Tem~ula on ~e g~ ~y of S~tember 1992 by ~e foHo~ng ro~ c~ yore. A Y=~S: 5 DIRECTORS: Birdsall, Moore, Lindemans, Mu~oz Parks, NOES: 0 DIRECTORS: None ABSENT: 0 DIXECTORS: None june S. Greek, C~Clerk Redo, CSD 92-08 EXhibit "A" TE EECULA CONBIDi TTY SERVICES DISTR/CT Naming Parks and Recreation Facilities PD?JOSE To es:ab!ish a uniform policy and procedure that identifies criteria for the naming of parks and recreation facilities. POLICY The Park and Recreation Commission will be responsible for the se!ec=ion of names for parks and recreation facilities. Once a name is selected, it will be forwarded to ~_he Board of Directors for ratification. Staff will be responsible for encouraging citizens and community organizations to suggest possible names ~az will then be forwarded to the Commission for consideration. At a minimum, each park and community building will be designated a name. Naming of specific areas within a park (g~rden, swimming pool, lake, ballfield, etc.) is acceptable but should be kept to a minimum to avoid confusion. No park shall .be given a name which might be perceived as controversial by the community- All names selected shall be acceutab!e and meaningful to a majority of the neighborhood/community. where the park or recreation facility is !oca=ed. Priority in naming sites shall be given to geographical !ucations, historic significance or geologic features. No park sha!!,'be.named' for a person, except where an individual has made a significant' financial contribution toward the acquisition and/or development of the park or facility, or has been an outstanding long-time community leader who has supported open space and recreational activities. All park and recreation facilities.will be designated a formal name wilhin six months of ac~_--uisizion or construction. All parks shall have an entrance sign. Buildings will have an entrance sign and a p!acue inside the facility for name identification. The name of a park or recreation facility may be changed only after a hearing is held by ~he Commission to receive community inpu~ and direction. No name shall be changed ~n!ess ~here is significan~ juszificalicn and support by the community. RSPONSIBIL!TY D am arman= Parks and Recreation Commission DeDarrm~en~ ACTION Ac,.--uires a new park cr recreation faci!iZy. Solicits possible names from c~unizy. Forwards suggested names Zo the Parks and Recreation Commission for consideration. Receives any additional community input. Se!ec=s a name for'the new park cr recreation facility. ForWards name to 'CiIy Council fsr ratification- Installs the appropriate naming sign or plaque. DEPARTMENTAL 'REPORT CITY ATTORNAEPyPROV.~~ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT' TO: Board of Directors FROM: Ronald E. Bradley, General Manager DATE: November 14, 1995 SUBJECT: Departmental Report PREPARED BY: ',.-Shawn D. Nelson, Director of Community Services Phase I of Parkview Site Project (Fire Station) and Pauba Road improvements bid opending was held on October 19, 1995. Staff anticipates the award of a construction contract at the November 14, 1995 City Council meeting, with construction to begin in December, 1995. Phase II of the Parkview Site Project provides for slope stabilization and re-vegetation improvements within the creek at the Rancho California Sports Park. The funding for this project includes ~100,000 from State Grants and $200,000 from Development Impact Fees. The consultants are currently preparing recommendations for channel rehabilitation and will begin the preparation of construction drawings. It is anticipated that this project will be 'out to bid in December, 1995. The final design for Margarita Community Park was approved by both the Community Services Commission and the City Council. Staff anticipates presenting the Margarita Community Park Master Plan to the Temecula Valley School District Board of Directors before the end of the this month. Upon final approval by the Board of Directors, the consultant will begin the construction drawings. The Temecula Middle School Lighting Project is complete and the fields are currently being used by the Temecula Valley Sports Leagues. The Rancho California Sports Park Improvement Project is currently under construction and on schedule. Development of the 10 acre site will complete the improvements to the northeast corner of the park at Rancho Vista and Margarita Roads. The improvements will include parking, picnic facilities, a roller hockey rink, a skateboard facility, restroom/concession building, landscaping and irrigation system. A dedication ceremony for Nicolas Road Park and Voorburg Park was held on Thursday, October 19, 1995. Nicolas Road Park is a three acre neighborhood park and Voorburg Park is a ~luarter acre neighborhood park. The two parks are open to the public and have been well received by the neighborhoods surrounding the parks. Escrow for the new City Hall is scheduled to close on November 22, 1995. A Grant Deed presentation ceremony has been planned for December 1, 1995, 2:00 P.M. - 4:00 P.M. The consultant, Tsutsumida and Associates, and the design team are in final review of the space plan design. Once the City Council has approved the final space plan, the consultant will begin construction drawings for tenant improvements. The design team for the City Maintenance Yard has met to review the employee input forms for the facility. The architect is currently working on the design for the building and should be complete by the end of the month. Staff anticipates that this project will be out to bid in January or February, 1996. The first project committee meeting for the design of the Duck Pond was held on Tuesday, October 31, 1995. The landscape architect, the Alhambra Group, is currently working on the park design. It is anticipated the project committee will meet in the next thirty days to review the plan. A design services contract was awarded to Albert Webb and Associates for the 6th Street Parking Project. Preliminary site plans for that facility have been received and are being reviewed by staff. This project will be designed in conjunction with the Temecule Shuttle Project. Sam Hicks Monument Park is currently out to bid. Bid opening is scheduled for November 30, 1995. It is anticipated an award of contract will be considered by the City Council on December 19, 1995. If approved, construction will be in February, 1996. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ITEM 1 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING HELD NOVEMBER .14, 1995 A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency was called to order at 7:44 PM at the Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. Chairperson Ronald J. Parks presiding. PRESENT: 4 AGENCY MEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Roberrs, Parks ABSENT: 1 AGENCY MEMBERS: Stone Also present were Executive Director Ronald E. Bradley, General Counsel Peter Thorson and City Clerk June S. Greek. PUBLIC COMMENTS None given. CONSENT CALENDAR It was moved by Agency Member Lindemans, seconded by Agency Member Birdsall to approve Consent Calendar Item Number 1. AYES: 4 AGENCY MEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Roberts, Parks NOES: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None ABSENT: 1 AGENCY MEMBERS: Stone Minutes 1.1 Approve the minutes of October 17, 1995. AGENCY BUSINESS Consideration of RDA Commercial Rehabilitation Small Business Loan Executive Director Bradley stated staff requests a continuance on this item to the meeting of November 28, 1995. Chairperson Parks declared the item continued by unanimous consensus. r:\minutee.rda\l 11495 -1- 3. ProDosed Amendments to the Bylaws of the Old Town RedeveloDment Advisory Committee Community Development Director Gary Thornhill presented the staff report and announced that Susie Bridges has been elected Chairperson and Ward Albert has been elected Vice Chairperson of the Advisory Committee. It was moved by Agency Member Lindemans, seconded by Agency Member Roberts to approve staff recommendation as follows: 3.1 Review and approve the proposed amendments to the Bylaws of the Old Town Redevelopment Advisory Committee. The motion was unanimously carried with Agency Member Stone absent. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT Executive Director Bradley reported the Old Town Entertainment Project is moving forward, and Mr. Buffman has secured the necessary options on property to keep the project in Old Town. AGENCY MEMBER'S REPORTS None given. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Agency Member Lindemans, seconded by Agency Member Roberts to adjourn at 7:50 p.m. to a meeting on November 28, 1995, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. The motion was unanimously carried with Agency Member Stone absent. Ronald J. Parks, Chairperson ATTEST: June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk/ Agency _Secretary r:\minutes.rda\l 11495 -2- ITEM 2 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA REPORT Executive Direr~gency Members Gary Thornhill, Community Development Director NoVember 28, 1995 Revision to the Facade Improvement Rebate Program Prepared By: Craig D. Ruiz, Assistant Planner RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Redevelopment Agency do the following: Approve the Revision to the Facade Improvement Rebate Program· BACKGROUND On April 25, 1995, the Redevelopment Agency adopted the Facade Improvement Rebate Program. The program was intended to provide financial incentives to encourage small businesses and property owners to rehabilitate the Tourist Retail Core District in Old Town and to bring their property into conformance with the Old Town Specific Plan· The first step in the Facade Improvement Program requires that a property owner obtain two bids from licensed contractors to perform the rehabilitation work. Next, a written agreement is entered into by the Agnecy and property owner. The agreement requires the property owner to have the work completed by a contractor licensed by the State of California, and the Agency to rebate the agreed upon percentage of the overall cost, once the work is completed and inspected. Staff has discussed the program with several interested property owners; some property owners have informed staff that they could perform the rehabilitation work at a lesser price than that of a licensed contractor. The increased costs have made potential rehabilitation projects infeasible. Therefore, staff is recommending that the Facade Improvement Rebate Program be amended to require applicants to submit three bids, two of which shall be from licensed contractors. Because no funds will be issued until the project is completed and finaled by the Planning and Building Departments, staff feels that this is an adequate safeguard to insure all work will be completed in a satisfactory manner. R:\STAFFR.PT~i=ACAD~,.CC'2 11/20195 vs~ 1 FISCAL IMPACT None. Attachments: 1. Amended Facade Improvement Program R:XSTAFFRP"f~FACADE. CC2 11116195 vsg 2 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 FACADE IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PROGRAM PARAMETERS R:\STAFFILuT~i=ACADF,,CC2 11116195 vsg 3 ATFACHMENT NO. 1 Program Requirements Applicants must submit two written bids from licensed contractors. Applicants of multiple businesses within a building are encouraged to work together to receive one set of bids for the entire building. This will reduce the cost per business. If the applicant intends ~o do the work hint,~df/hersetf, they must supply an additional third written bid. In addition, if the applicant inte. Pata m do the work hlmaelf/herseaf and rely upon the ownerfouild~r exceptions to State Contracting law, the applicant must ~ompty with th~ parameters of that exception-including th~ requiremenl that only the appticant's employees may. be paid for the work or the total cost of the work (labor and materials) must not exceed $300.00. R:XSTAFFRPT~FACADE. CC'2 11r20/95 vsg 4 ITEM 3 CITY MANAGER TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Redevelopment Agency Board Members Mary Jane McLarney, Assistant City Manager November 28, 1995 Professional Hospital Supply Owner Participation Agreement RECOMMENDATION: Continue a public hearing for Professional Hospital Supply Owner Participation Agreement to December 12, 1995. DISCUSSION: Staff recommends that the item be continued as a portion of the Owner Participation Agreement has not been finalized. ITEM 4 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICi~E~~ CITY MANAGE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENCY REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Executive Director/Redevelopment Agency Members Mary Jane McLarney, Assistant City Manager November 28, 1995 Consideration of RDA Commercial Rehabilitation Small Business Loan RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council consider approval of an RDA small business loan to the Health Zone (natural/health food store) to be located at the Temecula Plaza, Ynez and Solana Way. DISCUSSION: The City has received an application from the Health Zone to move to a new location and to expand their facilities. The business was founded in 1990 by Paul Cook and Tom Watson. Since the opening, sales have increased to where larger facilities are needed to better serve 'its customers and the new location will double the floor space with better customer exposure and parking. With the move, the Health Zone will also be able to offer new and expanded product lines. It is projected that this move will allow the business to increase sales by 50% in the first twelve months. The new property will be leased for a term of 5 years (60 months) with one 5 year option. The loan amount requested is $100,000. The loan proceeds will be used for tenant improvements, interior store fixtures and new refrigeration units. The total requirement for the expansion is estimated at $130,000 of which the additional $30,000 is coming from business reserves. The terms of the loan are as follows: $100,000 amortized over a 5 year period at a rate of 9.75% with payments of $2112.42 per month. The loan is secured by all existing equipment and all new equipment purchased for the expansion. This loan is in conformance with the criteria of the RDA loan program and has been reviewed ' by our independent loan committee. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL The loan approval would be subject to the receipt of a detailed list of the existing equipment to be used at the new location ( including but not limited to serial numbers, description and estimated worth) plus at the completion of the project, a list of all new equipment ( including but not limited to serial numbers, description and cost). The City will file a UCC-1 and Landlord's waiver on the furniture, fixtures and equipment. Funds will be controlled during the construction of the tenant improvements. FISCAL IMPACT: To date, the City has funded $209,400 in redevelopment loans. OLD TOWN WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY ITEM 1 MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE OLD TOWN WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY HELD NOVEMBER 14, 1995 A regular meeting of the Old Town Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority was called to order at 7:50 PM at the Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. Chairperson Patricia H. Birdsall presiding. PRESENT: 4 ABSENT: 1 BOARD MEMBERS: Lindemans, Parks, Roberts, Birdsall BOARD MEMBERS: Stone Also present were Executive Director Ronald E. Bradley, City Attorney Peter Thorson and City Clerk June S. Greek. PUBLIC COMMENTS None given. CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Minutes 1.1 Approve the minutes of October 17, 1995. It was moved by Board Member Parks, seconded by Board Member Roberts to approve the minutes of October 17, 1995, The motion carried as follows: AYES: 3 BOARD MEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Roberts NOES: 0 BOARD MEMBERS: None ABSENT: 1 BOARD MEMBERS: Stone ABSTAIN: 1 BOARD MEMBERS: Parks Appraisal of the Old Town Westside Improvement Authority Community Facilities District. No. 1 City Manager Bradley presented the staff report. r:\minutes.fa - 1 - It was moved by Board Member Lindemans, seconded by Board Member Parks to approve staff recommendation as follows: 2.1 Approve agreement to secure professional services for a complete narrative appraisal on the Old Town Westside Improvement Authority Community Facilities District, No. I and No. 2. The motion was unanimously carried with Board Member Stone absent. PUBLIC HEARINGS 3. Financina for Old Town Area Public Improvements and the Western Bvoass Corridor City Manager Bradley presented the staff report and recommended that this matter be continued until the next scheduled meeting. Chairperson Birdsall opened the public hearing at 8:53 PM. It was moved by Board Member Lindemans, seconded by Board Member Parks to continue the public hearing to the meeting of November 28, 1995. The motion was unanimously carried with Board Member Stone absent. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Board Member Lindemans, seconded by Board Member Parks to adjourn at 8:53 PM to a meeting on November 28, 1995, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. The motion was unanimously carried with Board Member Stone absent. ATTEST: Patricia H. Birdsall, Chairperson June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk/ Authority Secretary r:\minutes.fa -2- ITEM 2 OLD TOWN/WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY AGENCY REPORT TO: Board Members FROM: Ronald E. Bradley, City Manager DATE: November 28, 1995 SUBJECT: Financing for Old Town Area Public Improvements and the Western Bypass Corridor RECOMMENDATION: That the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority continue the four (4) Public Hearings listed below: CFD I Intention to Establish a CFD and to Authorize the Levy of Special Taxes CFD 2 Intention to Establish a CFD and to Authorize the Levy of Special Taxes CFD I Intention to Incur Bonded Indebtedness of the Proposed CFD No. 1 CFD 2 Intention to Incur Bonded Indebtedness of the Proposed CFD No. 2 DISCUSSION: The Mello-Roos statutes which govern formation and operations of a Community Facilities District require that the Financing Authority enter into agreements with any other public agency that will own or operate facilities within the proposed district. Since the discussions and agreements with Rancho California Water District, Eastern MuniCipal Water District and the Riverside County Flood Control District have not been finalized, staff recommends the Public Hearing be continued to the meeting of December 12, 1995. At that time, testimony will be taken from the public as it relates to the formation of the district. FISCAL IMPACT: None. R:INORTONLLAGENDAS|FAPUBHRG, AGN I 1/06/95 p, M~DED NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ~ING DATE OF HEARING Old Town/W~t~ide Community Facilities Disuict Financing Authority Community Pacilities Disuict No. 1 (Old Town Area Public !,m!nxr~ements) Notice is hereby given that on September 12, 1995, the Board of Directors of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority adopted a Re,~lution cntified 'A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Old Town/West~dc Community Facilities District Financing Authority of Intention To Establish A Community l~acilities District And To Authorize The Levy Of Special Taxes Punuant To The Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act Of 1982'. Pm'suant to the lVlello-Roos Community l=acilities Act of 1982 (the 'Act') the Board of Direcwrs hereby gives notice as follows: A. The text of said ~lution of Intention is as follows: WHEREAS, under the Mello-Roos Community F-t-ilities Act of 1982, as mended (the "Act*), Chapter 2.5 of part I of Division 2 of Title 5, commencing at Section 53311, of the California Government Code, this Boai'd of Directon of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities Di.mia Financing Authority (the * Autharity") is authol'ized to establish a community facilities district and to act as the legislative body for a community facilities ~, this Board of Directors now desires to procad with the establishment of a community facilities district (the "District") in order to finance costs of public infrastructure necessary or incident to development in the Old Town area of the City of Temecuh (the *City'). NOW, TI4k'RF, FORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY the Board of Directors of the Old TowrffW~de Community F,cili,les District Financing Authority as follows: .1. This Board of Directars proposes to conduct proceedings to establish a community facilities district pursuant to the Act. 2. The name proposed for the District is Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 1 (Old Town Area Public Improvements). c-lo · ~. The proposed boundaries of the Dimict are as shown on the map of the Disu-ict on file with the Secrem.~, which boundaries are hereby pre. minn,'ily approved and m which map reference is hereby made for further paniculan. The Sea'em.ry is hereby directed to record, or cause w be recorded, said map of the boundaries of the District in the office of the County Recorder within fifteen days of the date of adoption of this Resolution, but in any event at least fifteen days prior to the public hearing rden~d to in ~h 10 below. 4. The type of public fadlities propoF. d to be ~n=n_r~l by the District and pursuant to the Act shall consist of those items listed as fadli~ on Bxhibit A hereto and by this reference incorpomu~l herein (the "Fn~li~ies*). The Board of Direcwrs hereby finds and determines that the public interest will not be served by allowin~ the p, ope~ty owners in the District to enter into a contract in acwxdsnce with Section 53329.5(a) of the Act. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the DisU~ may enter into one or more conwatts directly with any of the y,oyc~ty ownas with respea to the construc~ of the Fn~'li~es. The Executive Directer of the Authority is hereby anthori-ed and directed to enter into joint community facilities agreements with any entity that will own or operate any of the Facilities, as determined by bond counsel to be nece~ry to comply with the provisions of Section 53316.2(a) and (b) of the Act. The Board of Direct~'s of the Authority hereby declares that such joint agi~ements will be beneficial to re~ident~ in the area of the District. 5. Except to the extent that fun& are otherwise av~lnhle to the District to pay for the Facilities and/or the principal and inter. st as it becomes due on bonds of the District issued to acquire .the Facilities, a special tax sufficient to pay the costs thereof, secured by' recordation of a con~-ming lien a~ainst all non-exempt real pxopc~ty in the District, will be levied annually within the District, and collected in .the same manner as ordinary ~ valorera property taxes or in such other manner as this Board of Directors or its desi~nee shall determine, including direct billing of the affeaed pro~.,~ty ownas. The proposed rate and method of apportionment of the special tax among the parcels of real yxoixAy within the District and the inter~ts in those parcels, in sufficient detail to allow each landowner within the proposed District to estimate the maximum mount such owner will have to pay, are described in Bxhibit B attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein. This Board of Directon hereby finds that the pwviions of Section 53313.6, 53313.7 and 53313.9 of the Act (relating to adjustments to ad valorera pwlx-tty taxes and schools financed by a community facilities district) are inapplicable to the District. 6. It is the intention of this Board of Dh'eaon acting as the legislative body for the District to cause bonds of the Authority to be issued for the District pursuant to the Act to finance in whole or in pan the Facilities. Said bonds shall be in the a~regate principal mount of not to exceed $12,500,000, shall bear interest payable semi-anunnlly or in such other manner as this Board of Directon shall determine, at a rate not to exceed the maximum C-ll rate of intorut as may be authorized by applicable hw at the time of sale of such bonds, and shall mature not to exceed 40 years from the date of the issuance thereof. 7. The levy of said proposed special tax shall be subject to the approval of the qualffied electors of the District at a special election. The proposed voting procedure shall be by mailed or hand-delivered ballot among the landowners in said proposed District, with each owner having one vote for each acre or portion of an acre such owner owns in the District. 8. F, xcept as may otherwise be pwvided by law or by the rate and method of apportionment of the special taxes for the DisU4.a, all lands owned by any public entity, including the United States, the State of California and/or the City, or any departments or political subdivisi~ms thffeof, shall be omitted from the levy of the special tax to be made w cover the costs and expenses of the Facilities and the Di.mia. In the event that a portion of the propen~ within the District shall become for any reason exempt, wholly or in part, from the levy of the special tax described in Bxhibit B, this Board of Difcctoxs will, on behalf of the District, increase the levy to the extent nece~ upon the x, emsaining yxolxa Ly within the District which is not exempt in order to yield 'the required debt sea'vice payments and other annual expenses of the District, ff any, subject to the provisions of the rate and method of apportionment of the special taxes for the Diah~ct. 9. The Executive ~ of the Authority, as the officer having charge and control of the Facilities in and for the Disu'ict, or his dcsignee, is h~eby directed to study said proposed Facilities and to mnk~, or cause to be m~,4~-, and file with the Secretary a report in writing, presenting the following: (a) A description of the Facilities by type which will be requized to adequately meet the needs of the District. Co) An estimate of the fair and reasonable cost of the Facilities including the cost of acquisition of lands, rights-of-way and easements, any physical facilities required in conjunction therewith and incidental ~ in connection therewith, including the costs of the pwposed bond financing and all other related costs as provided in Section 53345.3 of the Act. Said report shall be made a pan of the record of the public hearing provided for below. I0. Tuesday, November 14, 1995, at 7:00 p.m. or as soon as possible thereafter, in the Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vim Road, Temecula, California, be, and the same are hereby appointed and fixed as the time and place when and where this Board of Directon, as legislative body for the District, will conduct a public heating on the establishment of the District and consider and finally determine whether the public interest, C-12 convenience and necessivy require the formation of the DisUict and the levy of said special tax. 11. Thc Secretary is hereby directed to cause notice of said public hearing to be given by publication one time in a newspaper published in the area of the District. The publication of said notice shall be completed at least seven days bcforc the date herein set for said hearing. Said notice ~hnll be substanfinliy in the form of F=xhibit C hereto. 12. The Authority Froposes to repay cemin landowners within the District, solely from the proceeds of bonds of the City and the Authority issued for the Disuia, funds advanced by such landownen to pay costs of the City and the Authority to form the District. The procedures for such xt'payment will be set forth in dcmil in docvments to be approved by this Board of D4fecton following the public hearing on the District referred to above. 13. The finn of Jones Hall Txi11 & White, A Professional Law Corporation, is hereby confirmed as bond counsel for the DisU'ict and any bonds of the Authority for the District, and the fn'm of Berryman & Henigar is hereby diesi,~nnted as special tax consultant to the Authority for the DisUict. The ~=-xecutlve Dixector is hereby o,~ori.,ed and dh'ected to ente.,' into conWacts with said firms fortheir services with respect to the Disnia, in form acceptable to counsel to the Authority and the F, xecuti~ Dixector. B. The exhibits to the Resolution which desre'be the facilities to be financed and the rate and method of .apportionment of the special taxes for the district are on file in the office of the Secretary of thc Authority, C. The time and place established under said Resolution for the public hearing required under the Act are Tuesday, November 14, 1995, at the hour of 7:00 p.m. or as soon as possible thcrcafter, in the Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temccuh, California. ' D. At said heating, the testimony of all interested persons or taxpayen for or against the establishment of the district, the extent of the district or the furnishing of the specified types of facilities will be heard~ Any person interested may file a protest in writing as provided in Section 53323 of the Act. If fifty percent or more of the registered voten, or six registered voten, whichever is more, residing in the territory proposed to be included in the district, or the ownen of one-half or more of the area of land in the ten'itoxT proposed to be included in the district and not exempt from the special tax, file written protests against the establishment of the district and the pwtests are not withdrawn to reduce the value of the pwtests to less than a majority, the Board of Directors shall take no further action to create the district or levy the special taxes for period of one year from the date of decision of the Board of Dixectors, and if the majority protests of the registexed voten or landownen ate only against the fumishn'g of a type or types of facilities within the district, or against C=13 l~vying a specifi~ special tax, thos~ types of facilities or th~ specified special tax will be eliminated from th~ proceedings to form the dislzict. E. The proposed voting procedure shall be by special mail or hand-delivered ballot to the propen~ owners within the territory Froposed to be included in the district. Dated: October '~, 1995 City Cl~rk C-14 'AMENDIm NOTICE OF PUBIC B'v-4.RING ~ING DATE OF N'~ARING Old Town/W~de Community Facilities District Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 2 Notice is hereby given that on September 12, 1995, the Board of Direaors of the Old Town/Westside Conununity Facilities Distria Financing Authority adopted a Resolution enti~ed 'A Resolution of the Boani of Directars of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities DisUia Financing Authority of Intention To Establish A Community Facilities District And To Authorize The levy Of Special Taxes Pursuant To The Mello-Roos Community Fadli~es Act Of 1982'. Pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (the * Act*) the Board of Directors hereby ~ives notice as follows: A. The text of said Resolution of ~ntentlon is as follows: Wm;~'-4~q, under the Mello-Roos Community F~cifities Act of 1982, as mended (the " '"), Chapmr 2.5 of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5, commernc4ng at Section 53311, of the Act California Government Code, this Board of Dizecton of the Okl Tn/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority (the "Authority") is autharized to establish a community facilities dis=ict and to act as the legislntive bodyfor a community f~cifiti~s dira-ict; and WW~,F2S, this Board of Directors now dedres to proceed with the establishment of a community facilities district (the *District') in order to finance costs of public in/msmactu~ necessary or incident to development in the Westside area of the City of Temecula (the *City'). NOW, ~RE, BE IT !~'-~OLVED BY the Board of Directon of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities ~ Financing Authority as follows: 1. This Board of Directors proposes to conduct proceedings to establish a community 'facilities district pursuant to the Act 2. The name proposed for the District is Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority Community Facilities Disu'ia No. 2 (Westside Area Public Improvements). 3. The proposed boundaries of-the District are as shown on the map of the District on file with the Secretary, which boundaries are hereby pl~Brnin~rily approved and to which map reference is hereby made for further particulars. The Secretary is hereby direaed to record, or cause to bc recorded, said map of the boundaries of the Disuict in the office of the County Recoi'der within fifteen days of the date of adoption of this Resolution, but in any event at least fifteen days prior to the public hearing rden'ed to in paragraph 10 below. 4. The type of public facilities proposed to be financed by the District and pursuant w the Act sb~ll consist of those items listed as f-ncili.~ on Exhibit A hereto and by this reference incorporated herein (the 'Facilities*). The Boazd of Directon hereby finds and determines that the public interest will not be served by allowing the FroyctLy owners in the District to enter inw a contract in accordance with Section 53329.5(a) of the Act. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the District may enter into one or more contracts directly with any of the property owners with respect w the construction of the l~acili~es. The Executive Direaor of the Authority is hereby authori~,,d and dh*ected to enter inW joint community f~eilitles agreements with any entity that will own or operate any of the Facilities, as detemined by bond counsel to be necc$,s. y to comply with the provisions of Section 53316.2(a) and Co) of the ACt. The Board of Direcmn of the Authority hereby declares that such joint agreements will be bene~ci~ul to residents in the area of the District. 5. Except to the extent that funds ate othexwise available to the District to pay for the Facilities and/or the principal and interest as it becomes due on bonds of the District issued to acquire the Facilities, a special tax su~ei,-nt m pay the costs thereof, secured by recordation of a continuing lien against all non-exempt real F, oI~ty in the .District, will be levied annually within the District, and collected in the same manner as ordinary m2r vdzlorem proper ty 1axes or in such other n-,anner as this. Board of Directors or its de~Znee- shnn determine, including direct billing of the affected yrc,p~.ty owners. The proposed rate and method of apportionment of the special tax among the parcels of real l,,oltaty within the DisUict and the interests in those parcels, in sufficient detail to allow each landowner. within the proposed District to estimate the maximum amount such owner will have to pay, arc ~bed in Exhibit B attached herera and by this reference incorporated hcreh. This Board of Directors hereby -finds that the provisions of Section 53313.6, 53313.7 and 53313.9 of the Act (relating to adjustments to sad valorera laol/=,ty taxes and schools financed by a community facilities district) ate inapplicable to the District. 6: It is the intention of this Board of Directors acting as the legislative body for the District to cause bonds of the Authority to be issued for the District pursuant to the Act to finance in whole or in pan the Facilities. Said bonds shall be in the aggregate principal mount of not to exceed $15,000,000, sb~ll bear interest payable semi-annually or in such other manner as this Board of DirecWrs shall determine, at a rate not to exceed the maximum rate of interest as my be authorized by applicable law at the time of sale of such bonds, and shall mature not to exceed 40 years from the date of the issuance thereof. c-9 7. The levy of said proposed special tax shall be subject lo the approval of the qualified electon of the Distzict at a special election. The proposed voting proc~u~ shall be by mailed or hand-delivered ballot among the landowners in ssid pwposed District, with each owner having one vote for each acre or portion of an acre' such owner owns in the District. 8. Except as may otherwi~ be provided by law or by the rate and method of apportionment of the special taxes for the Diraict, all lands owned by any public entity, including the United States, the State of California and/or the City, or any departments or political subdivisions thereof, slnsa11 be omitted from the levy of the special tax to be made to cover the costs and expenses of the Facilities and the District. In the event that a portion of the property within the District shall become fat any teason exempt,. wholly or in pan, from the levy of the special tax desczibed in Exhibit B, this Board of Directors will, on behalf of the District, increase the levy to the =tent nece~ry upon the remaining ~,roFc~ty within the District which is not exempt in order'to yield the requized debt senrice payments and other annual expenses of the District, if any, subject m the provisions of the rate and method of apportionment of the special taxes for the Dhttia, 9. The F. xecutive Diregtor of the Authority, as the o~wer having charge and control of the F~cilities in and for the District, or his rJeeignee, is hereby directed to study said pro/x~sed Facilities and to make, or cause to be made, and file with the SectemiT a report in writing, presenting the following: (a) A description of the Facilities by type which will be required to adequately meet the needs of the District. Co) An estirnale of the fair and re~ov,ble cost of the Facilities including the con of acquisition of lands, fights-of-way and easements, any physical f~cilities required in conjunction therewith and incidental expehs~ in connection therewith, inciuding the costs of thc proposed bond financing and all other related costs as provided in Section 53345.3 of the Act. Said report shall be made a pan of the record of the public heating provided for below. 10. Tuesday, November 14, 1995, at 7:00 p.m. or as soon as possible thereafter, in the Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California, be, and the same are hereby appointed and fixed as the time and place when and where this Board of Directors, as legislative body for the District, will conduct a public hearing on the establishment of the District and consider and finally determine whether the public interest, convenience and necessity require the formation of the District and the levy of said special tax. 11. The Secretmy is hereby directed to cause notice of said public hearing to be given by publication one lime in a newspaper published in the area of the District. The publication of said notice shall be completed at least seven days before the date herein set for said hearing. Said notice shall be substantially in the form of Exhibit C hereto. C-10 12. The Authority proposes to repay certain landowners within the Disu'ict, solely from the proceeds of bonds of the City and the Authority issued for the Distria, funds advanced by such landowners W pay costs of the City and the Authority to form the District. The procedures for such repayment will be set forth in detail in documents to be appwved.by this Board of Directors following the public hearing on the Distri~ rderred to above. 13. The firm of Jones Hall Kxll & White, A Professional I~w Corporation, is hereby confirmed as bond counsel for the District and any bonds of the Authority for the District, and the firm of Berryman & Heni~ar is hereby designated as special tax consultant w the Authority for the District. The Executive Dh'eaor is hereby authorized and directed to enter into conwacts with said firms for their services with respect to the Distx~, in form acceptable to counsel w the Authority and the Executive Director. B. The exhibits to the Resolution which describe the facilities to be financed and the rate and method of apportionment of the special taxes for the distria are on file in the office of the Secretary of the Authority. C. The time and place established under said Resolution for the public heaxing required under the Act are Tuesday, November 14, 1995, at the hour of 7:00 p.m. or as soon as possible thereafter, in the Community Recreation Center, 308'/5 Rancho Vim Road, Temecula, California. D. At said hearing, the testimony of all inUn'ested persons or taxpayers for or against the establishment of the disuict, the extent of the disuia or the furnishing of the specified types of facilities will be heard. Any person interested may file a protest in writing as provided in Section 53323 of the Act. If fifty percent or more of the ~ voters, or six registered voters, whichever is more, residing in the tm'ritory lyroposed to be included in the district, or the owners of one-half or more of the area of land in the terriWry lm3po~ to be included in the district and not exempt from the special tax, file written prom against the establishment of the district and the prom are not withdrawn to reduce the value of the protests to less than a majority, the Board of Directors shall take no further action to create the district or levy the special taxes for period of one year from the date of decision of the Board of Directors, and if the majority prom of the registered voters or landowners are only against the furnishing of a type or types of fairies within the district, or against levying a specified special tax, those types of facilities or the specified special tax will be eliminated from the proceedings to form the district. E. The propose~ voting procedure shall be by special mail or hand-delivered ballot to the property owners within the t~ritory proposed to be includ~ in the district. Dated: October 2, 1995 u~~.ty S~~C, City Clerk/ C-12 I~DRD NOTICE OF PUBLIC ~&RING AMENDING DATE OF HEARING Old Town/Westside Community F~cilities District Financing Authority Community Facilities Disn'ict No. 1 (Old Town Area Public Improv~ts) Notice is hereby given that on Septelnber 12, 1995, the Board of Direaors of the Old Town/West.side Community F~cilities District Financing Authority adopr=d a Resolution entitled *A Resolution of the Board of ~ of th~ Old Town/Westside Community Facilities Di~i2.1a FinancinE Autherity of Intention To Incur Bonded Indebtedness of the Proposed Old Town/W~ Community Fut-ilifies Diraia Fin~ncinE Authority Community Facilities Disuict No. 1 (Old Town Area Public Improvements) Pursuant To The Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982'. Pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (the 'Act') the Board of Directors hereby gives notice as follows: ~, this Board of ~ has this dale adopted its Resolution entitled 'A Resolution of the Board of Di~ectoxs of the Old Town/Westslde Community Facilities District Financing Authority of Intention to Establish a Community F~,,411tles Di-hict and To Authorize the Levy of Special Taxes Pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", stating its intention to farm a community facilities distria pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 19112, as mended (the 'Act'), Chapter 2.5 of Pan 1 of Division 2 of Title 5 of the California Government Code, for the purpose of financing cevain public improvements (the 'Facilities'), as further pw~ded in said Resolution; and WI~iEAS, this Board of Directors estimates the mount required for the financing of a portion of the costs of the Facilities to be the sum of not to exceed $5,987,000; and Wn'~'~-~l~, in order to finance a portion of the costs of said Facilities it is neces.~ry · to incur bonded indebtedness in the mount of not to.exceed $12,500,000. NOW, Ti~'~F-i~13RE, BE IT RESOLVI~, by the Board of DirecWn of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority as follows: 1. It is ~eces,~ry to incur bonded indebtedness within the boundaries of the pwposed Old Town/Westside-Community Facilities District Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 1 (Old Town Area Public Improvements) (the 'Di.m~') in the mount of up to $12,500,000 to finance the costs of the Facilities. 2. The bonded indebtedness is proposea to be incurred for the purpose of financing the costs of the Facilities, including acquisition and improvement costs and all costs incidental to or connected with the accomplishment of said purposes and of the financing thereof, as permitted by Section 53345.3 of the Act. 3. This lkmrd of Directms, acting as legislative body for the District, intends to authorize the issuance and sale of bonds in the maximum aggregate principal amount of not to exceed $12,500,000, bearing intcr~ payable semi-annually or in such other manner as this Board of Directon shall determine, at a rite not to exceed the maximum rate of interest as may bc authorized by applicable hw at the time of sale of such bonds, and maturing not to exceed ,iO years from the date of the issuance of said bonds. 4. Tuesday, November 14, 1995, at 7:00 p.m. or as soon as possible the~eafzr, in the Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temeatla, California, be, and the same aze hereby appointed and fixed as the time and place when and where this Board of Dizecton, as legislative body for the Distri~ will conduct a public hearing on the proposed debt issue and consider and finally determine whether the public interest, convenience and necessity require the issuance of bonds of the Authority for the District. 5. The Secvmry is hergby directedto cause notice of said public hearing to be given by publication one time in a newspatuer of general ciradafion circulated within the District. The publication of said notice shall be completed at least seven C/) days before the date herein set for said public hearing. Said notice shall substantially in the form of Exhibit A hereto. B.' The liearing refen'ed to in the aforrs~d Resolution sNdl be at the tim and place specified in said Resolution. C. At that time and place the testimony of all. interested persons, including persons owning prope~ in the area of the i)roposed community fncilities district, will be heard. Dated: October 2, 1995 June S. G~ CMC, City Clerk Agency Secretary ~mos.FA~9S-03 ~ED NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ~ING DATE OF ~ARING Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority Community Facilities Disuict No. 2 Notice is hereby given that on September 12, 1995, the Board of Directors of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority adopted a Resolution en~~ed "A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority of Intention To Inan' Bonded Indebtedness of the Proposed Old Town/Westsidc Community F~c~lifies District Findracing Authority Community Facilities DisUict No. 2 (W~de Area Public Improvements) Pursuant To The Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982:. Pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (the 'Act') the Board of Directors hereby gives notice as follows: A. The te~t of said Resolution is as follows: WHEREAS, this Board of Dirt~axs has this date sdopted ils Resolution entitled 'A Resolution of the Board of Direaors of the Old Town/Weslside Comm~mlty Facilities District Financing Authority of Intention to ~lish a Community Fs~eili~es District and To Authorize the Levy of Special Taxes Pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982', stating its intention to form a community facilities district pursuant to the Mello--Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as mended (the *Act*), Chapter 2.5 of Pan I of Division 2 of Title 5 of the California Government Code, for the purpose of financing certain public improvements (the' *Facilities*), as further provided in said Resolution; and WHEREAS, this Board of Directors estimates the mount required for the finan~g of a portion of the costs of the Facilities to be the sum of not to exceed $10,000,000; and WHEREAS, in order to finance a portion of the costs of said Facilities it is n__~c~_~ry to incur bonded indebtedness in the mount of not to exceed $15,000,000. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of Directors of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority as follows: 1. It is necessary to incur bonded indebtedness within the boundaries of the proposed Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority Community Pacilities District No. 2 (Westside Area Public Improvements) (the *District') in the mount of up to $15,000,000 to finance the costs of the Facilities. 2. The bonded indebtedness is proposed to be incurred for the purpose of financing the costs of the Facilities, including acquisition and improvement costs and all costs incidental to or connected with the accomplishment of said purposes and of the financing thereof, as pertained by Section 53345.3 of the Act. 3. This Board of Direaon, acting as legislative body for the District, intends to authorize the issuance and sale of bonds in the maximum aggregate principal mount of not to exceed $15,000,000, bearing interest payable semi-annually or in such other manner as this Board of Directon shall determine, at a rate not to exceed the maximum rate of interest as may be authorized by applicable law at the time of sale of such bonds, and maturing not to exceed 40 years from the date of the issuance of said bonds. 4. Tuesday, November 14, 1995, at 7:00 p.m. or as soon as possible thereafter, in the Community P, ecreation Center, 30975 Rancho Vista Road, Texnec-ln; California, be, and the same are hereby appointed and fixed as the time and place when and where this Board of Directors, as legislative body for the District, will conduct a public hearing on the proposed debt issue and consider and finally determine whether the public interest, convenience and necessity require the issuance of bonds of the Authority for the District. 5. The Secretary is hereby directed to cause notice of mid public hearing to be given by publication onc time in a newspaper of general draxlation ch'culated within the District. The publication of said notice shrill be completed at least seven C/) days before the date herein set for said public hearing. Said notice shall substantially in the form of Exhibit A hereto. B. The hearing referred to in the aforesaid Resolution sh~11 be at the time and place specified in said Resolution. C. At that time and place the testimony of all intere,r~ persons, including persons owning proix, ty in the area of the proposed community facilities district, will be heard. Dated: October 2, 1995 gAn~e~j~Gr~t~yMC, City Clerk, itaa~.FA~5-4B -3- OLD TOWN WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY ITEM 1 MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE OLD TOWN WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY HELD NOVEMBER 14, 1995 A regular meeting of the Old Town Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority was called to order at 7:52 PM at the Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. Chairperson Patricia H. Birdsall presiding. PRESENT: 4 BOARD MEMBERS: Lindemans, Parks, Roberrs, Birdsall ABSENT: 1 BOARD MEMBERS: Stone Also present were Executive Director Ronald E. Bradley, City Attorney Peter Thorson and City Clerk June S. Greek. PUBLIC COMMENTS None given. CONSENT CALENDAR It was moved by Board Member Roberrs, seconded by Board Member Lindemans to approve Consent Calendar Item No. 1. 1. Minutes 1.1 Approve the minutes of October 17, 1995. The motion carried as follows: AYES: 3 BOARD MEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Roberts NOES: 0 BOARD MEMBERS: None 'ABSENT: 1 BOARD MEMBERS: Stone ABSTAIN: 1 BOARD MEMBERS: Parks r:\minutes.otwa\l 11495 -1- ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Board Member Parks, seconded by Board Member Roberrs to adjourn at 7:54 PM to a meeting on November 28, 1995; 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. The motion was unanimously carried with Board Member Stone absent. PM ATTEST: Patricia H. Birdsall, Chairperson June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk/ Authority Secretary r:\minutes.otwa\l 11495 -2- ITEM NO. 22 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: . APPROV CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICE CITY MANAGER OITY OF TEMEOULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager ~ Gary Thornhill, Community Development Director November 28, 1995 Draft Development Code Prepared by: John Meyer, Senior Planner RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended the City Council: 1. Open the public hearing and receive public testimony; 2. Adopt a Negative Declaration 3. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 95- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING THE CERTAIN GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY OF TEMECULA'S GENERAL PLAN 4. Introduce and Approve the first reading of an Ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 95- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING THE DEVELOPMENT CODE AND CONSISTENCY ZONING MAP, AND AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE GENERAL PLAN INTRODUCTION On July 9, 1991, the City Council approved a contract with The Planning Center to assist the City in preparing its first General Plan and Development Code. The General Plan was adopted in November of 1993. The Development Code is the primary instrument for implementing the General Plan. Temecula's General Plan is a 20-year plan, while the Development Code and R:\DEVCODE\DEVCODE.CCI 11116195 klb 1 the Zoning Map respond to shorter-term needs and conditions. Each of the residential, commercial, business park, and other land use designations are detailed by zoning districts which specify permitted uses, conditional uses, and development standards for each zone. The Code was developed pursuant to the authority granted to the City of Temecula by the Constitution of the State of California and in compliance with the requirements of Section 65800 et.seq. of the Government Code, Planning, Zoning and Development Laws. The power to zone or regulate is given to the City to promote and protect the communities health, safety and general welfare. It is the aim of the Code to provide a serviceable, attractive and economically viable city. State law requires that a city zoning ordinance be consistent with a City's adopted General Plan. The City desired a Development Code which established straight forward processes and standards put forth in a manner understandable by both professionals and the public. To accomplish this, the consultant was directed to seek out successful zoning ordinances from other communities and draft a suitable ordinance for the City of Temecula. To assist the staff and The Planning Center prepare the Development Code, the City Council appointed a Development Code Advisory Committee. The Advisory Committee consisted of seven appointees by the Council, past Planning Commissioner Dennis Chiniaeff and Councilmember Mu~oz. The Council Appointees were Larry Markham, Vince DiDonato, Don Rohrbacher, David Christian, Doug Scott, Csaba Ko and Kevin McKenzie. The Advisory Committee met on several occasions and reviewed a screen-draft code between July 1993 and August 1994. During this process, the Advisory Committee deliberated on many issues and provided significant direction to staff. The consensus of the Advisory Committee is that the draft code is a solid, well organized document. PUBLIC HEARING Between March 20 and October 16, 1995, the Planning Commission held seven public hearings to receive 'testimony and public input on the Draft Development Code. As a result of the consultant's work, the effort of the advisory committee and staff's pro-active approach to receiving community input, there were virtually no controversial issues brought to the Commission during the public hearings. The Commission considered all input and requests and directed staff to make the appropriate revisions. Those revisions were then approved by the Commission at its October 16, 1995 meeting. The November 9, 1995 draft of the Development Code includes those revisions as approved by the Commission. GENERAL PLAN LAND USE AMENDMENT AND THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP As part of the work program to adopt the Development Code, the City is conducting a citywide consistency zoning effort. The purpose of this effort is to amend the zoning from the interim County Districts to City Districts. This is fairly straightforward because almost every General Plan Land Use Designation will be implemented by a single zoning district. The three exceptions are the Low Residential, Business Park and Open Space designations. Consistent with procedures used during the General Plan Process, property owners dissatisfied with the district applied to their property were encouraged to submit a written request to staff. The Commission reviewed, took testimony and provided direction individually on each request. DEVCODE\DEVCODE.CC1 2 In addition to the consistency zoning effort, staff is also processing a City-sponsored General Plan Amendment (GPA). The proposed amendment would modify General Plan land use designations determined to be inappropriate subsequent to the adoption of the General Plan in November, 1993 and to accommodate the requested changes to the zoning map. The majority of these proposed changes will result in land uses more relevant with the existing uses or buildings. PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN LAND USE AMENDMENTS During this process, staff has received several requests from property owners to amend the land use designation on their property. To facilitate the review of these requests, staff has developed the attached GPA Parcel Specific Land Use Request Matrix. The matrix contains a location or parcel number, the existing land use designation, the requested land use designation, and a staff recommendation and response. Each request is numerically keyed on an accompanying exhibit. The applicants' letters of request stating their positions have also been attached an numbered for the Council's review. The Commission reviewed, took testimony and provided direction individually on each request. PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY DISTRICT Based on direction from the Commission, Staff has included a new chapter to the Development Code entitled Planned Commercial Development Overlay District. The purpose of this chapter will allow for the comprehensive and integrated development of large commercial sites for certain limited commercial uses through site plan approval. Development outside those limitations would be'subject to a specific plan and the underlying zoning regulations. The Planned Commercial Development Overlay should allow large scale development to take advantage of the superior environment which can result from large scale community planning, and thereby reduce adverse environmental impacts of uncoordinated development. Attachments: ,2. .3. 4. GPA Parcel Specific Land Use Request Matrix - Page 4 Chapter 17.17, Planned Commercial Development Overlay - Page 5 Resolution No. 95- - Page 6 -Ordinance No. 95- Page 9 DEVCODE~DEVCODE.CC1 3 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 GPA PARCEL SPECIFIC LAND USE REQUEST MATRIX DEVCODE\DEVCODE.CC1 4 E: :a,:i >' >' o~ I= >' >' >' :D i: .c_ · E' '~oo c: '&,-. m- -S o u._o, :,,..a: ~ ~ ,,, ,- e '~ e >.. Z ~ >- m ):.~ >' >" 'o >, '.i E *o ._uu; >. ~ ~ --- ' ~.a'- > ,~ :e '~ o-~ ~e~ ~>;::! >"-,:z!:: w .~ ~!::~i~iiz ~""' w c ," ,. o c :'"' !a: E ~' "' o o ~- ~: a: w a. EE '~ o :-i..O, i:::~i o~ '~ ~ E ~ ~n m ,- E " ~ ~ ~: =~'~' ~ ~ ,- :! !::~>!::i: ~= ~ = = 3 a o~ w ~ c= ~ o '~ °~ ::::i!':ii:c~m a. a. ): ~ .-,. w a.. ~" w~ w ~'~c ~ cx :; ~ ~ wO Z wew :~.:~ :.L . .a ~ ~ ~_ > ~-- ~: :: -F:,~" i ~ou EE ~ n 0:::: : c m '~ ~ m ce -- fJ i n'- we~- >-i 'u-o :5~,_"" ~' 'u :!:~::a!i~' i ,c ~ ~, ,a w '~ o w w .-. w ~, -~ .g '~ c :_: ,:,, ,_ "* ,, ,, ~,. ~;o =u.c~ ,, ~; ~ .:_~ ®.o i: ::; e e e ,o ~ e 0 E 'o ,-~ mcwE :::::m A"' :6 m m ~z '- m :; E Zrr -- m ~.oZ U ~ -~ ):: .,um _ o " a. wwcw a. us. .-, o ~ w tu o I.-- 'u w ~ o rr O0 O~ 0 0 ~, ~n c~ 'o m-- ' ~ -6-o m-~ ,... ~D o o ~ o oSu ~ ~ 5~ ~ 0 "' co ~> o ~ rnu ~e=,_ 6 w ,-,- m c~_ E m m E mm_ E m E --~- E o_~' E EE EE E E E EE 0 0 0 0 0 0 :ll:: (,) (J (J CJ (J CJ "q:: ~ ..6 c~ ,,-, SPECIFIC PLAIN u v EKI_,A 1 .~ Approved Specific Plan .~ Proposed Specific Plan . Areas N~: S~e names of Spm~c Plan Areas on followrang tmagt Planned Commercial Development Area I F General Plan Program · f 7"~~ THE PLANNING FIGURE 2-5 ATTACHMENT NO. 2 CHAPTER 17.17 PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY DEVCODE\DEVCODE.CC1 5 CHAPTER 17.17 PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY DISTRICT Sections: 17.17.020 17.17.040 17.17.060 17.17.080 17.17.100 17.17.110 17.17.120 17.17.140 17.17.160 17.17.180 17.17.200 17.17.210 Planned Commercial Development Overlay District (PCDOD) Established. Purposes Definitions. General Requirements: PCDOD. Uses Permitted in the PCDOD Subject to Site Plan Approval Requirements for Uses in the PCDOD Subject to Site Plan Approval Uses Permitted in the PCDOD Subject to Specific Plan Approval Procedures for Specific Plan Approval Effect of Approval Content of Specific Plan Specific Plan Consistency Amendment to Approved Plans 17.17.020 Planned Commercial Development Overlay District Established. The Planned Commercial Development Overlay District is hereby established and shall be known as "PCDOD." 17.17.040 Purposes. The Planned Commercial Development Overlay District is designed to achieve the follbwing purposeS: To provide for the classification and development of parcels of land as complete, comprehensive, and integrated commercial projects so as to take advantage of the superior environment which can result from large scale community planning, and thereby reduce adverse environmental impacts of uncoordinated development. To permit limited uses as a matter of right, such as a comprehensive retail center, while allowing for the diversification of land uses as they relate to each other in a physical and environmental arrangement within the general parameters of a retail or business park setting, while ensuring substantial compliance with the provisions of this Chapter. To provide fora zoning district encompassing various types of land uses such as business parks, industrial parks, commercial centers, major value retailers, power centers, or a combination of the uses through: The development of a major retail center or "power center" as provided in this Chapter, subject to site plan approval by the Planning DEVCOOE\CHPTR17 Commission and .City Council; or The adoption of a specific plan. and text materials which set forth land use relationships and development standards to ensure that other commercial development not approved through the site plan process will be a comprehensive, integrated, and coordinated development for property subject to this land use district. 17.17.060 Definitions. For the purposes of this Chapter, the following words and phrases shall have the meanings set forth below: 'Major Value Retailer' shall mean an individual commercial retail establishment containing a gross floor area in excess of sixty-five thousand square feet (65,000 sq. ft.). Such major value retailers shall include large discount warehouse-style retail sales enterprises such as Home Base, Home Depot, Price Club/Costco,'as well as large-space high-volume specialty stores, such as Good Guys, Circuit City, Super Crown Books and Toys R Us. Major value retailers also include major discount department stores, like Wal-Mart, K Mart and Target. Such retailers do high volume, large quantity, low frills service and sales. The terminology for a major value retailer shall mean either a single retail use or single user of retail floor area within a free-standing building or a single use or single user of retail floor area incorporated within or attached to a power center. 'Power Center' shall mean a combination of one or more commercial establishments planned, developed, and constructed on a single lot or parcel of land which includes at least one major value retailer utilizing a gross floor area in excess of ninety thousand square feet (90,000 sq. ft.). Section 17.17.080. General Requirements: PCDOD. The following requirements shall apply to all PCDOD areas: Use regulations as set forth in Section 17.08.030 of this Development Code pertaining to the Service Commercial (SC) zoning district, including uses listed in Table 17.08(a). Special use regulations and standards as set forth in Section 17.08.050 of this Development Code. Landscape requirements and standards as set forth in Section 17.08.060 of this Development Code pertaining to the Service Commercial (SC) zoning district. De Performance standards as set forth in Section 17.08.070 of this Development Code. ~OOE\CHPTR17 -2- Environmental standards as set forth in Section 17.08.080 of this Development Code. All other relevant chapters of Title 17 of the Development Code, including, but not limited to, Off-Street Parking and Loading (Chapter 17.24) and Covenants for Easements (Chapter 17.26). In the event of a conflict between PCDOD requirements set forth in Sections 17.17.110 et sea_. below and those requirements set forth in Section 17.17.080 A - F above, the Director of Community Development shall determine which requirement best implements the intent of the Development Code. Section 17.17.112}0. Uses Permitted in the PCDOD Subject to Site Plan Approval. The following shall be permitted uses in the PCDOD subject to site plan approval and not subject to commercial development standards under Section 17.08.040 of this Development Code: Ae Detached major value retailer containing a gross floor area in excess of sixty- five thousand square feet (65,000 sq. ft.) with no more than ten percent (10%) of the gross floor space dedicated to use by multiple subvendors. Power center including at least one major value retailer utilizing a gross floor area in excess of ninety thousand square feet (90,000 sq. ft.). No major value retailer tenant may dedicate greater than ten percent (10%) of its gross floor area to multiple subvendors. Section 17.17.110. Development Standards for Uses in the PCDOD Subject to Site Plan Approval. The development standards for the PCDOD are generally the same as for the requirements listed under Section 17.17.040. However, modifications to those standards may be approved to allow for greater flexibility in reaching the objectives of the Planned Commercial Development and compatibility with the General Plan. Variations to the base standards shall be considered as a part of the review and approval of the Planned Commercial Development Section 17.17.120. Uses Permitted in the'PCDOD Subject to Specific Plan Approval. All other uses in the PCDOD or.flay zone are subject to specific plan approval, including general requirements outlined under Section 17.17.080 for all PCDOD uses and subject to commercial development standards set forth in Section 17.08.040 of this Development Code. Section 17.17.140. Procedures for Specific Plan Approval. A. Pre-Submittal and Preparation. of Specific Plan DEVCOOE\CHPTR17 -3- / A preliminary application and application fee as set by resolution of the City Council are required prior to filing a formal Specific Plan application. A pre-applicafion conference with the Planning Department representatives is'required prior to filing of the formal specific plan application. This is intended to provide direction to the applicant and to provide information prior to preparation of detailed plans. Prior to the preparation of a Specific Plan, the applicant shall hold a public scoping meeting to identify potential community concerns about the project. Public notice of the scoping meeting is required. Noticing procedures shall be defined by the Planning Department at the pre- application conference. Hearing and Notice Upon receipt in proper form of a Specific Plan application, or direction of the City Council, a public heating.shall be set before the Planning Commission and City Council. Notice of the hearings shall be given pursuant to the requirements of Section 17.03.040 of this Development Code. Planning Commission Action on Specific Plans The Planning Commission shall make a written recommendation on the proposed Specific Plan whether to approve, approve in modified form or disapprove, based upon the findings contained in this Chapter. Planning Commission action recommending that the proposed Specific Plan be approved, approved in modified form, or denied shall be considered by the City Council following Planning Commission action. City Council Action on Specific Plans Upon receipt of the Planning Commission's recommendation, the City Council may approve, approve with modifications, or disapprove the proposed Specific Plan based upon the findings contained in this Chapter. Findings A Specific Plan may be adopted only if all of the following findings are made: (1) The proposed Specific Plan is consistent with the General Plan and the Development Code. 'CODE\CHPTR17 -4- (2) (3) (4) (5) The proposed Specific Plan would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare of the City. The subject property is physically suitable for the requested land use designations and the anticipated land use developments. The proposed Specific Plan shall ensure development of desirable character which will be compatible with existing and proposed development in the surrounding neighborhood. The proposed Specific Plan is a fully integrated project. Section 17.17.160. Effect of Approval. The Adoption of a Planned Commercial Development Overlay District shall include an amendment to the Zoning Map. The designation on Zoning Map shall include the designation "PCDOD" followed by a reference number that corresponds to the name of the Specific Plan. Land Use designations and zoning for the area will then be guided by the provisions of this Development Code or adopted Specific Plan. If the Specific Plan does not address a particular standard, the provisions of this Development Code shall apply. Section 17.17.180. Content of a Specific Plan. A Specific Plan application shall include a text and diagrams which contained all of the provisions outlined in Government Code Sections 65451 and 65452. The form and content of the Specific Plan shall contain, at a minimum, the following: A boundary survey map of the property and calculations of the gross land area within the proposed zoning district. A tentative subdivision map may be substituted if the application proposes to subdivide the property. A topographical map and general grading concept plan with specific sections for sensitive areas. A diagram, text, and exhibits describing the site, proposed land uses, circulation, public facilities and services, and phasing. A preliminary report describing anticipated requirements and proposed means of providing utility facilities and public services, including but not limited to, storm drainage, sewage disposal, water supply, parks and recreation and school facilities. E. A discussion of how the Specific Plan implements the applicable elements of DEVCOOE\CHPTR17 -5- the General Plan. A description of site development standards including but not limited to, listing of allowable uses, maximum and minimum regulations, required setbacks and supplemental illustrations as required, establishing the basic community architectural character, environmental character, and environmental design qualities to be attained throughout the Specific Plan area. A Phasing and Financing Plan to assure the adequate provision of public utilities, improvements, and other facilities. Other data and related exhibits deemed necessary by the Director of Community Development, Planning Commission, or City Council. Section 17.17.200. Amendment to Approved Plans. No public works project, tentative map or parcel map may be approved, adopted, or amended within an area covered by a Specific Plan, unless found to be consistent with the adopted Specific Plan. Section 17.17.210. Specific Plan Consistency. Amendments to an approved Specific Plans shall be made in the same procedure as followed when the plan was adopted. Any adopted Specific Plan may also be repealed by the same procedure as the plan was originally adopted. Prior to the adoption of an ordinance to repeal and discontinue a Specific Plan, the City Council with a recommendation from the Planning Commission shall find that the plan is no longer necessary for the orde~y and systematic implementation of the General Plan. The repealing ordinance shall include provisions for the immediate application of appropriate zoning to the area covered by the repealed plan. ~00E\CHPTR17 -6- ATTACHMENT NO. 3 RESOLUTION NO. 95- DEVCODEXDEVCODE.CC1 6 ATrACHMIWr NO. 3 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL FOR Tn'F. CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING CERTAIN GENERAL PLAN AMENDlVI'ENTS TO THE CITY OF TEMECUI. A'S GENERAL PLAN Wlt'F. REAS, Section 65300 of the Government Code requires that cities adopt a comprehensive, long-term general plan for the physical development of the jurisdiction as well as any adjacent areas which, in the judgement of the city, bears a relationship to its planning; and WltEREAS, On November 9, 1993, the City Council of the City of Temecula adopted the General Plan. WItFRIAS, Sections 65350 of the Government Code penits a city to mend the general plan; and WHEREAS, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), as mended (Sections 21000 through 21177 of the Public Resources Code), requires that prior to the approval of any project the Lead Agency consider the potential impacts and effects of said project, consider alternatives to the project, and identify mitigation measures necessary to reduce or eliminate the impact of the project on the environment; and I~/}{F, REAS, the City of Temecula has prepared a Negative Declaration for the General Plan Amendment in accordance with the provisions of CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines prepared by the Office of Planning and Research; and WHEREAS, the Planing Commission has held duly noticed public hearings on March 20th, April 3rd, June 5th, June 19th, July 17th, August 21st, September 18th, and October 16th 1995 to consider the proposed General Plan Amendment; and WltF. REAS, on October 16, 1995, the Planing Commission recommended to the City Council that the Council approve and adopt the General Plan Amendment; and WltF. REAS, the City Council has held a duly noticed public hearing on November 28, 1995 to consider the proposed General Plan Amendment; and NOW, T!:rEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL FOR ~ CITY OF TE1VIECULA DOES WEREBY RESOLVE AND DETERMINE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council hereby approves and adopts the Amendment to the General Plan for the City of Temecula, as set forth on exhibit "A" as mended attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. The General Plan Land Use Designation map for the City DEVCODE\DEVCODE .CC 1 7 of Temecula is hereby amended as set forth in Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 2. Environmental Compliance. An Initial Environmental Study was prepared for this project. The Initial Study identified no additional si~cant impacts beyond those impacts identified in the Environmental Impact Report prepared for the General Plan. Therefore, the Negative Declaration for the General Plan Amendment is hereby adopted. Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. Section 4. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 28th day of November, 1995. Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALII=ORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMECULA) I FrFREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 281h day of November 281h, 1995 by the following vote of the Council: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: CITY COUNCILMEMBERS: CITY C OUNCIIaVIEMBERS: CITY C OUNCIIJVIEMBERS: June S. Greek, City Clerk DEVCODE\DEVC ODE. CC 1 8 ATTACHMENT NO. 4 ORDINANCE NO. 95- DEVCODE\DEVCODE. cc 1 9 ATTACHMENT NO. 4 ORDINANCE NO. 95- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING THE DEVELOPMENT CODE AND CONSISTENCY ZONING MAP, AND AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE GENERAL PLAN WHEREAS, Section 65800 of the Government Code provides for the adoption and administration of zoning laws, ordinances, rules and regulations by cities to implement such general plan as may be in effect in any such city; and WHEREAS, Sections 65860 of the Government Code requires that a zoning ordinance shall be consistent with the adopted general plan of the city; and WHEREAS, the process of preparing the zoning ordinance has included a number of opportunities for public and citizen involvement included a number of town meetings, technical committee meeting and public hearings, and by making numerous copies of the plan and associated documents available to the public; and WHEREAS, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), as amended (Sections 21000 through 21177 of the Public Resources Code), requires that prior to the approval of any project the Lead Agency consider the potential impacts and effects of said project, consider alternatives to the project, and identify mitigation measures necessary to reduce or eliminate the impact of the project on the environment; and WHEREAS, the City of Temecula has prepared a Negative Declaration for the Draft Development Code and Consistency Zoning in accordance with the provisions of CEQA and the · CEQA Guidelines prepared by the Office of Planning and Research; and WHEREAS, the Planing Commission has held duly noticed public hearings on March 20th, April 3rd, June 5th, June 19th, July 17th, August '21st, September 18th, and October 16th 1995 to consider the proposed Development Code, Consistency Zoning, and Negative Declaration; and WHEREAS, on October 16, '1995, the Planing Commission recommended to the City Council that the Council approve and adopt the Draft Development Code, Consistency Zoning and Negative Declaration; and WHEREAS, the City Council has held a duly noticed public hearing on November 28, 1995 to consider the proposed Development Code, Consistency Zoning and Negative Declaration; and DE VCODE~DEVCODE. CC 1 10 STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMECULA) I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 28th day of November, 1995 by the following vote of the Council: AYES: CITY COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: CITY COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: CITY COUNCILMEMBERS: June S. Greek, City Clerk DEVCODE~,DEVCODE .CC 1 12 THY~ CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY OF TEMECULA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. NEGATIVE DECLARATION. The City Council hereby adopts the Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act for the Development Code and consistency rezoning. Section 2. DEVELOPMENT CODE. The City Council hereby adds Title 17, Zoning, to the Temecula Municipal Code, as set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as the Development Code and Zoning Ordinance for the City of Temecula. Section 3. ZONING MAP. The City Council hereby adopts Exhibit "B" as the Zoning Map for the City of Temecula. Section 4. SEVERABIIJi~. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any sentence, paragraph, or section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance. Section 5. NOTICE OF ADOPTION. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shah cause the same to be posted as required by law. Section 6. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shah be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its passage. The City Clerk shah certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause copies of this Ordinance to be posted in three designated posting places. Section 7. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTF~r} this 281h day of November, 1995. ATI'EST: Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney DEVCODE\DEVCODE.CC 1 11 DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS APPROVAL~ CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Council/City Manager Anthony Elmo, Chief Building Official ~ November 28, 1995 Building and Safety October 1995, Activity Report RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. DISCUSSION: The following is a summary of activity for October, 1995. Building Permits Issued ...................................... 81 Building Valuation .................................... $6,654,787 Revenue Collected ..................................... $65,516 Housing Starts ............................................ 57 New Commercial Starts ............................ I = 777 Sq. Ft. Commercial Additions/Alterations ................... 9 = 14,589 Sq. Ft. Building Inspections ...................................... 2,507 Valuation FY Year-to-Date .............................. 47,078,288 Agenda Report November 28, 1995 Page 2 Code Enforcement Actions ................................... 840 Active Cases Pending ...................................... 126 Closed Cases ............................................ 25 V:%WIN~ende;~O~'e6.Rpt APPROVAL CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer November-28, 1995 Public Works Monthly Activity Report RECOMMENDATION: Attached for City Council's review and filing is the Department of Public Works' Monthly Activity Reports for October, 1995. r:~agdrpt~moactrpt/ajp CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS Monthly Activity Report NOVEMBER, 1995 Submitted by: Joseph Kicak Prepared by: Don Spagnolo~.~ Date: November 28, 1995 I. WORK UNDER CONSTRUCTION: 1. Moraga Road Street WidenincJ: The project has been completed. Staff will be recommending acceptance of the project once the contractor has submitted the maintenance bond and contractor's affidavit. 2. Soorts Park Parkincj and Skate Board Park: The contractor has constructed all of the curbs for the parking areas, placed the concrete for the roller hockey rick, installed the sports lighting, poured concrete for the sidewalks and started placing blocl( for the restroom building. The contractor will continue construction of the restroom and start landscaping operation in November. The project is expected to be completed by February, 1996. 3. Temecula Middle School Li~jhtin~J Project: The contractor has completed all construction of the lighting project and is assembling his as-builts drawings and required documentation for acceptance by the City Council. 4. Solana Way Storm Drain Improvements: The contractor has completed the grading operation and has started placing concrete for the 78" storm drain pipe. This project should be completed by the beginning of next year. 5. Walcott Corridor: The project is in the process of being awarded to Genesis Construction and once the construction contact is fully executed a pre-construction meeting will be conducted. The project will provide for the realignment of an underground waterline and a paved road surface on Nicolas Road, Calle Giraslo, Calle Chapos, Walcott Lane and La Serena Way. This project is scheduled to start in December and be completed by fall of next year. pwO4~moectrpt\cip\95~nov.mar 11 ~28~95 Monthly Activity Report November 28, 1995 Page 2 6. Modification to Signal at Jefferson Avenue and Winchester Road This project will be installing additional signal heads to provide right turn arrows for north bound traffic on Jefferson Avenue to go east bound on Winchester Road. The contractor expects to perform all the work during the night of Sunday, November 19, 1995. II. OUT TO BID 1. Sam Hicks Monument Park Improvement Project: Bids for construction are currently being solicited. Bids will be opened on November 30, 1995. The improvements include the construction of a 950 square foot concession stand and restroom facility, asphalt parking lot, landscaping and irrigation improvements, and assorted park site amenities. 2. Fire Station #84: Bids were opened on October 19, 1995. A recommendation to the City Council to award.the project to Great West Contractors is scheduled for November 14, 1995. Construction is anticipated ';'o start during the beginning of December and be completed by August, 1996. The project will include grading, sewer, road improvements on Pauba Road between the new church site and Margarita Road, construction of the new fire station and landscaping. 3. I-15/Winchester Road InterchancJe Modifications: The plans and specifications have been approved and the acquisition of the two sections of property became effective on September 1, 1995. Caltrans has also released the encroachment permit for this project. Solicitation of Public Construction Bids, which has been authorized by the City Council, began the week of November 13, 1995. The City will receive sealed bids up to 3:00 p.m. on Thursday, December 7, 1995. The project provides for the widening of the Winchester Road Bridge over the. 1-15 freeway, the widening of the Santa Gertrudis Creek Bridge, and the construction of a new northbound loop ramp. pw04~noectrpt~cip~95\nov.mar 11128/95 Monthly Activity Report November 28, 1995 Page 3 III. WORK IN DESIGN 1. I-15/Rancho California Road Interchange Modifications: The Project Report as well as the plans and specification were submitted to Caltrans on June 16, 1995. Caltrans is in the process of reviewing these items and staff is expecting comments to be returned to the Consultant during the month of November, 1995. This project provides for the widening of the Rancho California Road bridge over the I-15 freeway and construction of a northbound loop ramp. 2. I-15/Overland Drive Overcrossing Imorovements: The plans and specifications were submitted to Caltrans for final review at the end of July, 1995. Caltrans has returned their comments to the Consultant. The City has also reviewed the plans and specifications and returned comments to the Consultant. The revised plans should be submitted to Caltrans during the month of December, 1995. The consultant is conducting a new soils investigation, which was requested by Caltrans, for design of the piles supporting the bridge. Legal plats and descriptions are being prepared for those properties that need to be acquired for construction of the project. 3. Emergency Generator: The project includes installing an emergency generator at the Community Recreation Center to provide power for emergency operations. The decision was made to change the location of the generator to allow better delivery and public access to the gym entrance. The new location would be an area west of the gym. The engineer is presently making the necessary changes. Staff will be requesting authorization to solicit public construction bids from the Council in November. 4. Traffic Signal (~ Route 79S and Marqarita Road/Redhawk Parkway Plans have been signed by the County & City. Caltrans has the plans for signature and issuance of an encroachment permit. This project will be installing a complete 4- way traffic signal and removing the median island on the south leg of the intersection to provide for a dual north bound left turn pocket. This project requires an agreement between the County of Riverside and the City for the costs of the design and construction since the southeast corner of the intersection is within the County. Once Caltrans issues an encroachment permit, staff will bring to the City Council a recommendation to solicit bid~ and to approve the agreement between the City and the County. pw04\moactrpt\cip\95\nov.mar 11128195 Monthly Activity Report November 28, 1995 Page 4 5. Interim Traffic Sicjnal ~ Route 79S and La Paz Street The third plan check was submitted to Caltrans on October 16, 1995. Comments on the plans have not been returned to the City. This project will be installing a 4-way interim traffic signal at the intersection of Route 79S and La Paz St. The ultimate improvements will be constructed when the highway is widened. 6. Interim Traffic Signal (6) Route 79S and Pala Road 'Received 2nd plan check comments from Caltrans. This project will be installing a 3- way interim traffic signal at Route 79S and Pala Road. The ultimate improvements will be constructed when the new Pala Road Bridge is constructed and the-highway is widened. Consultant is expected to revise the plans and return them back to Caltrans by the week of November 20, 1995. 7. Barrier Rail on Front St.'(6) Empire Creek The plans and specifications have been completed. This project will install a barrier rail on each side of Empire Creek at Front Str. eet. This project will be Federally funded under the Highway Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation Program (HBRR). The bidding process will start once Caltrans authorizes the City to bid the project. pwO4\moactrpt~cip\95\nov.mer 11128195 LAND DEVELOPMENT Monthly Activity Report Special Projects October, 1995 Submitted by: Joseph Kicak Prepared by: Steve Cresswell~ Date: November 3, 1995 FEMA/OES REIMBURSEMENT: Staff is continuing to coordinate with the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and the State Office of Emergency Services (OF, S) representatives in seeking reimbursement for costs incurred by the City due to the January 1993 floods and ensuing disaster declaration. OES has reimbursed the City a total of $952,832 to date. The total cumulative reimbursable amount is $1,080,996. Staff has also been coordinating with FEMA and OES in seeking reimbursement for costs incurred by the City due to the recent floods of January - March 1995. The total reimbursable amount being supported by the FEMA/OES field team is $175,863.59 for the Phase I disaster. Staff has also applied for over $122,275 in funding associated with the Phase II disaster. PARKVIEW SITE (PROJECT NO. PW93-09): Rough grading construction has been completed and City Council is anticipated to accept the improvements at the November 281h meeting. ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 159 (AD 159): - Highway 79 South plans were approved by Caltrans. Phase I construction (Butterfield Stage Road to Avenida de Missions) will go out to bid in October 1995 and is scheduled to begin in mid-January 1996. Phase II construction (I-15 interchange to Avenida de Missions) will go out to bid in March 1996 and scheduled to begin in mid-June 1996. ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 161 (AD 161): - Winchester Road (Area II) - estimated completion date is January 1996 OLD TOWN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT/ENTERTAINMENT CENTER: The following engineering design/study projects associated with the Old Town Redevelopment Project/Entertainment Center are currently underway. 1. PW95-07 - Phase I Western Bypass Corridor. The horizontal and vertical alignments for Western Bypass Corridor from Vincent Moraga Drive to Rancho California Road, with a grade separated intersection configuration, has been determined. The design engineer is in the process of finalizing the design on the portion of Western Bypass Corridor from the bridge over Murrieta Creek to Vincent Moraga Drive and the extension of Vincent Moraga Drive. r:/moactrpt/dev/gJ/October PW95-08 - First Street Extension. The topography of Murrieta Creek has been completed. Based on Federal Emergency Management Agency's and Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District's design criteria, the hydrologic analyses from the confiuence of Murrieta Creek at Temecula Creek upstream to north of Rancho California Road are being studied with the inclusion of both Western Bypass Corridor and First Street bridges. The bridge designs will commence once the hydrology report is completed. RFP//32 - Western Bypass Corridor Assessment District. The Assessment District Engineer has been working on the assessment spread to provide for an equitable spread based on benefit. RFP#38 - 6th Street Parking Project. A site layout accommodating the proposed Temecula Shutfie project, public parking and public restroom facilities has been prepared with extensive coordination with the proposed transportation depot. The design will be presented to Council early January, 1996, and we shall then proceed with the final design. Meanwhile, the alternative streetscape improvements arc being analyzed. r : l mo~cUlal d~ v19 510c tobe, r 0,9. __. I,- ~, 0 l- w w w ,¢ I- o oooo uuuu uuuo TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: MEMORANDUM oseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Brad Buron, Maintenance Superintendent November 1, 1995 Monthly Activity Report - October 1995 The following activities were performed by Public Works Department, Street Maintenance Division in-house personnel for the month of October 1995: II. III. IV. VI. SIGNS A. Total signs replaced B. Total signs installed C. Total signs repaired TREES' A. Total trees trimmed for sight distance and street sweeping concerns POTHOLES A. Total square feet of potholes repaired CATCH BASINS A. Total catch basins cleaned RIGHT~OF-WAY WEED ABATEMENT A. Total square footage for right-of-way abatement GRAFFITI REMOVAL A. Total locations B. Total S.F. STENCILING A. 336 new and repainted legends B. 32,838 L.F. of red curb new and repainted C. 0 S.F. of sandblasting/grinding VII. 27 11 0 2 98 28,483 71 10,217 r:\roads~actrpt~95%10 jle MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT- October 1995 Page No. 2 Also, City Maintenance staff responded to 15 service order requests ranging from weed abatement, tree trimming, sign repair, A.C. failures, litter removal, and catch basin cleanings. This is compared to 12 service order requests for the month of September, 1995. The Maintenance Crew has also put in 38 hours of overtime which includes standby time, P.M. surveillance (weekends only), and response to street emergencies. I.P.S. STRIPING AND STENCILING COMPANY has comoleted the following: · 0 L.F. of new and repainted striping · 0 L.F. of sand blasting The total cost for I.P.S. striping services was $0.00 compared to $0.00 for September, 1995. PESTMASTER SERVICES has completed the following: · 0 S.F. of right-of-way weed control, total cost $0.00 compared to $0.00 for August, 1 · Arbor Pro Tree Trimming removed I R.O.W. tree, total cost $250.00. The total cost for Street Maintenance performed by Contractors for the month of September, 1995 was $14,775.00 compared to $14,764.00 for the month of September, 1995. Account No. 5402 Account No. 5401 $250.00 $14,525.00 CC: Steve Cresswell, Principal Engineer - Land Development Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects Martin C. Lauber, Traffic Engineer r:\roads\actrpt\95\10 jle MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT- October 1995 Page No. 3 STREET MAINTENANCE CONTRACTORS The following contractors have performed the following projects for the month of October. DATE 10/02/95 10/10/95 10/11/95 ACCOUNT NO. 5401 DEL RIO ENTERPRISE STREETIC HANNEL/BRI DG E Vallejo Channel Mercedes @ 3rd Street Margarita Road 500' south of North General Kearney DESCRIPTION OF WORK Remove silt and debris - restore grouted rip-rap Restore and modify desilting ponds Restore grouted rip-rap TOTAL COST $5,200.00 $3,450.00 $875.00 MONTELEONE EXCAVATING DATE 10/25/95 10/25/95 10/25/95 10/25/95 STREET/CHANNEL/BRI DGE Margarita Road Santiago Road Pala Road Ynez Road DESCRIPTION OF WORK Remove silt and debris, refine channel Remove silt and debris, refine channel Remove silt and debris, refine channel Remove silt and debris, refine channel TOTAL COST $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $2,000.00 $1,000.00 r:\roads%ectrpt%95%10 jle ,¢ r..1 ~ ¢e ¢,e 0 "' 0 ~.E g g g g g g~ g~ g ~ o ; :Z ..a.~=~o oo o o -- ~ ~ ,.- ~o Lu o.!' OrJ~ ' U 0 ): '~- ~o0~, z I~ I-~ am.~ Iz Wu, O ' ~ ~ W w O) :~ W IB MI3E Z Z (/)e,¢lB ¢( u.I~Q¢w n- Z W Z (-) U,I ) ¢ ~, '~ e"; a. ~ e w woow 0 ~ Z .(r) Z (/) er Z a, -r OE :: ~ 0~. Z ~ :Z rr z c~ ~ a: ~ ooo~8 o08 o,~ 08 0 DATE 10-02-95 10-02-95 10-02-95 10-02-95 10-02-95 10-02-95 10-02-95 10-02-95 10-02-95 10-05-95 10-05-95 10-05-95 10-05-95 10-05-95 10-06-95 10-06-95 10-06-95 10-06-95 10-06-95 10-06-95 10-06-95- 10-09-95 10-09-95 10-09-95 10-10-95 10-10-95 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION GRAFFITI REMOVAL - OCTOBER, 1995 LOCATION Winchester Road L~ I-15 Bridge 27480 Ynez Road Santiago Road ~ Margarita Margarita Road ~ Solana Way Rancho California Road ~ Humber Road Rancho Vista E/O Mira Loma Villa Alturas ~ Pauba Road Preece L~ Ynez Road Margarita Road E/O Rustic Glen La Serena Park 29760 Rancho California Road 27999 Front Stree( 26250 Jefferson Ave. Barca ~ Margarita Road 27999 Front Street Ave. Barca ~ Margarita Margarita @ Southern Cross 30580 Rancho California Rd. 30559 Pauba Road Pescado @ Calle De Velardo La Serena ~ Margarita Road Front Street ~ Main Street Margarita @ Rancho Vista Margarita N/O Winchester Sports Park 42140 Lyndie Lane Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed RemOved Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed WORK COMPLETED 15 S.F. of Graffiti 7 S.F. of Graffiti 10 S.F. of Graffiti 5 S.F. of Graffiti 128 S.F. of Graffiti 2 80 110 26 390 498 156 12 68 36 300 50 46 20 60 6 2 194 150 100 50 S.F. of Graffiti S;F. of Graffiti S.F. of Graffiti S.F. of Graffiti S.F. of Graffiti S.F. of Graffiti S.F. of Graffiti S.F. of Graffiti S.F. of Graffiti S.F. of Graffiti S.F. of Graffiti S.F. of Graffiti S.F. of Graffiti S.F. of Graffiti S.F. of Graffiti S.F. of Graffiti S.F. of Graffiti S.F. of Graffiti S.F. of Graffiti S.F. of Graffiti S.F. of Graffiti -1- pwO3~oeds\wkcmpltd~95\10.Graffid 110195 GRAFFITI REMOVAL - OCTOBER, 1995 L10-10-95 '0-10-95 10-10-95 10-10-95 10-10-95 10-10-95 10-10-95 10-10-95 10-10-95 10-10-95 10-11-95 10-11-95 10-11-95 10-11-95 · ~---~ 0-13-95 '- .0-16-95 10-16-95 10-18-95 10-19-95 10-19-95 10-23-95 10-23-95 10-24-95 10-24-95 10-25-95 10-25-95 10-26-95 Ynez Road ~ Mervyn's Channel behind Target Center Margarita & Stonewall Lyndie Lane Miller's Outpost Ynez N/O Town Center Solana Way ~ Chlorine Station Ynez behind Mervyn's Solana Way ~ Motor Car Parkway Across Street from Ford Dealer La Serena Calle Medusa @ La-Serena Ave. Barca ~ Margarita Kent Hintergardt Park Margarita N/O Rancho Vista Vincent Moraga @ Felix Valdez Palm Plaza Via Puerta ~ Camino Verde N. General Kerney N/O Nicholas at Bridge Winchester N/O Nicholas at Bridge Rancho Cal Rd L~ Humbar Via Puerta L~ Camino Verda Humber ~ Yukon Margarita ~ Moraga Road Solana Way W/O Skywood Rancho Vista L~ Calle Rio Vista Aranda L~ Solana Way Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed 25 S.F. of Graffiti 1,170 S.F. of Graffiti 162 S.F. of Graffiti 110 S.F. of Graffiti 20 S.F. of Graffiti 250 S.F. of Graffiti 90 S.F. of Graffiti 170 S.F. of Graffiti 605 S.F. of Graffiti 240 S.F. of Graffiti 120 S.F. of Graffiti 75 S.F. of Graffiti 50 S.F. of Graffiti 90 S.F. of Graffiti 6 S.F. of Graffiti 3 S.F. of Graffiti 3 S.F. of Graffiti 504 S.F. of Graffiti 75 S.F. of Graffiti 68 S.F. of Graffiti 904 S.F. of Graffiti 480 S.F. of Graffiti 3 S.F. of Graffiti 10 S.F. of Graffiti 40 S.F. of Graffiti 135 S.F. of Graffiti 316 S.F. of Graffiti -~,- pw03\roads',wkcruplut\95\10.Graff~ti 110195 10-26-95 10-26-95 10-26-95 10-26-95 10-26-95 10-26-95 10-26-95 10-26-95 10-26-95 10-26-95 10-26-95 10-26-95 10-26-95 10-26-95 10-26-95 10-27-95 10-27-95 10-31-95 La Vida ~ Solana Way Renate ~ Via la Vida Margarita ~ Solana Way Margarita Middle School Margarita @ Ramsey Court 41770 Margarita Via la Vida ~ Margarita Solana Way @ Rycrest 29770 Solana Way Ynez Road ~ Solana Way Solana Way between Ynez L~ Margarita Road Solana Way between Margarita & Via Norte Via la Vida Margarita L~ Solana Way Moraga ~ Margarita Lyndie Lane ~ End of Cul-de-sac Joseph Road ~ Willow. Creek Riesling ~ Meadows Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed 3OO 450 240 25 115 15 12 15 125 85 41 108 22 35 20 240 87 20 S,F, of Graffiti S,F, of Graffiti S,F, of Graffiti S.F. of Graffiti S,F, of Graffiti S,F, of Graffiti S,F. of Graffiti S,F, of Graffiti S,F. of Graffiti S,F, of Graffiti S,F, of Graffiti S,F, of Graffiti S,F. of Graffiti S.F. of Graffiti S,F, of Graffiti S,F, of Graffiti S.F. of Graffiti S,F, of Graffiti TOTAL ,OCATIONS TOTAL S.F. 71 10,217 -3- pw03Lroads\wkcmpltd\95\10.Graffiti 110195 DATE 10-02-95 10-02-95 10-02-95 10-02-95 10-02-95 10-02-95 10-02-95 10-02-95 10-02-95 10-05-95 10-05-95 10-05-95 0-05-95 10-05-95 10-06-95 10-06-95 10-06-95 10-06-95 10-06-95 10-06-95 10-06-95 10-09-95 10-09-95 10-09-95 10-10-95 10-10-95 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION GRAFFITI REMOVAL - OCTOBER, 1995 · oo, ,o,' .I Winchester Road ~ I-15 Bridge 27480 Ynez Road Santiago Road ~b Margarita Margarita .Road L~ Solana Way Rancho California Road @ Humber Road Rancho Vista E/O Mira Loma Villa Alturas ~ Pauba Road Preece ~ Ynez Road Margarita Road E/O .Rustic Glen La Serena Park 29760 Rancho California Road 27999 Front Street 26250 Jefferson Ave, Barca ~ Margarita Road 27999 Front Street Ave, Barca ~ Margarita Margarita ~ Southern Cross 30580 Rancho California Rd, 30559 Pauba Road Pescado ~ Calle De Velardo La Serena ~ Margarita Road Front Street ~ Main Street Margarita ~ Rancho Vista Margarita N/O Winchester Sports Park 42140 Lyndie Lane WORK COMPLETED Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed 15 S.F. of Graffiti 7 S.F, of Graffiti 10 S.F. of Graffiti 5 S,F, of Graffiti 128 S.F, of Graffiti Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed 2 80 110 26 390 498 156 12 68 36 300 50 46 20 60 6 2 194 150 100 50 S.F. of Graffiti S,F, of Graffiti S.F, of Graffiti S,F, of Graffiti S,F, of Graffiti S.F. of Graffiti S.F. of Graffiti S,F, of Graffiti S,F, of Graffiti S,F. of Graffiti S.F. of Graffiti S,F, of Graffiti S,F, of Graffiti S,F, of Graffiti S,F, of Graffiti S,F, of Graffiti S,F, of Graffiti S,F. of Graffiti S,F, of Graffiti S.F. of Graffiti S,F. of Graffiti -1- pw03~oads~,wkcmpltd\95\10.Graffiti 110195 GRAFFITI REMOVAL - OCTOBER, 1995 10-10-95 10-10-95 10-10-95 10-10-95 10-10-95 10-10-95 10-10-95 10-10-95 10-10-95 10-10-95 10-11-95 10-11-95 10-11-95 10-11-95 10-13-95 10-16-95 10-16-95 10-18-95 10-19-95 10-19-95 10-23-95 10-23-95 10-24-95 10-24-95 10-25-95 10-25-95 10-26-95 Ynez Road ~ Mervyn's Channel behind Target Center Margarita & Stonewall Lyndie Lane Miller's Outpost Ynez N/O Town Center Solana Way @ Chlorine Station Ynez behind Mervyn's Solana Way @ Motor Car Parkway Across Street from Ford Dealer La Serena Calle Medusa ~ La Serena Ave. Barca ~ Margarita Kent Hintergardt Park Margarita N/O Rancho Vista Vincent Moraga @ Felix Valdez Palm Plaza Via Puerta @ Camino Verde N. General Kerney N/O Nicholas at Bridge Winchester N/O Nicholas at 'Bridge Rancho Cal Rd L~ Humbar Via Puerta L~ Camino Verda Humber @ Yukon Margarita ~ Moraga Road Solana Way W/O Skywood Rancho Vista ~ Calle Rio Vista Aranda L~ Solana Way Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed 25 S.F. of Graffiti 1,170 S.F. of Graffiti 162 S.F. of Graffiti 110 S.F. of Graffiti 20 S.F. of Graffiti 250 S.F. of Graffiti 90 S.F. of Graffiti 170 S.F. of Graffiti 605 S.F. of Graffiti 240 S.F. of Graffiti 120 S.F. of Graffiti 75 S.F. of Graffiti 50 S.F. of Graffiti 90 S.F. of Graffiti 6 S.F. of Graffiti 3 S.F. of Graffiti 3 S.F. of Graffiti 504 S.F. of Graffiti 75 S.F. of Graffiti 68 S.F. of Graffiti 904 S.F. of Graffiti 480 S.F. of Graffiti 3 S.F. of Graffiti 10 S.F. of Graffiti 40 S.F. of Graffiti 135 S.F. of Graffiti 316 S.F. of Graffiti -~- pw03~roads\wkcmpltd\95\10.Graf~ti 110195 10-26-95 10-26-95 '0-26-95 10-26-95 10-26-95 10-26-95 10-26-95 10-26-95 10-26-95 10-26-95 10-26-95 10-26-95 10-26-95 10-26-95 10-26-95 :)-27-95 10-27-95 10-31-95 La Vida L~ Solana Way Renate ~ Via la Vida Margarita ~ Solana Way Margarita Middle School Margarita L~ Ramsey Court 41770 Margarita Via la Vida ~ Margarita Solana Way ~ Rycrest 29770 Solana Way Ynez Road ~ Solana Way Solana Way between Ynez ~ Margarita Road Solana Way between Margarita & Via Norte Via la Vida Margarita L~ Solana Way Moraga L~ Margarita Lyndie Lane ~ End of Cul-de-sac Joseph Road ~ Willow Creek Riesling ~ Meadows Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed 300 450 240 25 115 15 12 15 125 85 41 108 22 35 20 240 87 20 S.F. of Graffiti S.F. of Graffiti S.F. of Graffiti S.F. of Graffiti S.F. of Graffiti S.F. of Graffiti S.F. of Graffiti S.F. of Graffiti S.F. of Graffiti S.F. of Graffiti S.F. of Graffiti S.F. of Graffiti S.F. of Graffiti S.F. of Graffiti S.F. of Graffiti S.F. of Graffiti S.F. of Graffiti S.F. of Graffiti TOTAL ,OCATIONS TOTAL S.F. 71 10,217 -3- pw03\roads\wl:cmpltd\95\10.Graffiti 110195 DATE 10-02-95 10-03-95 10-04-95 10-05-95 10-05-95 10-09-95 10-09-95 10-10-95 10-10-95 10-11-95 10-17-95 10-17-95 10-17-95 10-30-95 10-30-95 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION WORK COMPLETED - OCTOBER, 1995 SERVICE ORDER REQUEST LOG LOCATION Loma Linda ~ Pala Road Nicolas Valley Elementary Via Puerta ~ Camino Corte Ave. Barca ~ Margarita Corte Positas Rancho Vista ~ Margarita 30552 Iron Bark 29770 Solana Way 30168 Malino Road Margarita ~ Ave. Barca 41990 Greentree Via Toreno ~ Randho Vista 45610 Olympic Way River walk tract 39110 Rising Hill Drive Weeds Graffiti Graffiti Graffiti Plugged storm drain Graffiti Plugged storm drain Graffiti Tree/A.C. failure Graffiti Debris ~ Catch Basin Debris in street Tree spliting Channel concern Tree concern in R.O.W. 10-03-95 10-03-95 10-04-95 10-05-95 10-05-95 10-09-95 ,' 10-10-95 10-10-95 10-11-95 10-11-95 10-17-95 10-17-95 10-17-95 10-30-95 10-31-95 TOTAL S.O.R.'S 15 pwO3~roads\wk~mplUl\95\lO.svsrq 110695 DATE 10-02-95 10-03-95 10-05-95 10-09-95 10-11-95 10-12-95 10-16-95 10-17-95 10-23-95 10-25-95 """~0-26-95 10-27-95 10-30-95 10-31-95 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION OCTOBER, 1995 STENCILING · LOCATION. Area #2 Ynez N/O Motorcar Parkway Area #1 Area #1 Area #1 Area #2 Area #1 Bike Lanes Winchester @ Enterprise Circle South Bike Lane/City Wide Area #1 Area #1 Area #1 Area #2 Repainted Repainted Repainted Repainted Repainted Repainted Repainted Repainted Installed 2 Arrows & Repainted Repainted Repainted Repainted Repainted WORK COMPLETED 17 3,950 35 37 39 68 53 20 210 200 65 4,627 8,070 11,099 4,682 Legends L.F. of Red Curb Legends Legends Legends of Red Curb Legends -Legends Legends L.F. of 8" Solid White Line L.F. of Red Curb Bike Lane Legends L.F. Red Curb L.Fo Red Curb L.F. Red Curb L.F. Red Curb TOTAL NEW & REPAINTED LEGENDS TOTAL NEW & REPAINTED RED CURB TOTAL SANDBLASTING/ GRINDING 336 32,838 L.F. PWO3~ROADS~WKC~PLTI)\95\10.~I'EN~IL 110395 DATE 10-03-95 10-11-95 10-12-95 10-12-95 10-17-95 10-18-95 10-19-95 10-23-95 10-24-95 10-24-95 10-25-95 10-30-95 10-30-95 'LOCATION CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION OCTOBER, 1995 R.O.W. WEED ABATEMENT Pala Road S/O Loma Linda La Serena E/O Pina Colada Rancho Vista @ Southern Cross South General Kearney Area #1 Area #2 Area #2 & #3 Area #4 Area #3 Via Norte to Calle Pina Colada Felix Valdez @ Sixth Street Ynez between Rancho California Road & Equity Road Margarita N/O Winchester Abated Abated Abated Abated Abated Abated' Abated Abated Abated Abated Abated Abated Abated 'WORK COMPLETED · 510 S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds 1,550 S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds 200 S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds 95 S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds 3,650 S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds 5,000 S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds 6,400 S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds 600 S.F. of R.O.W. 3,500 S.F. of R.O.W. 1,570 S.F. of R.OoW. 420 S.F. of R.O.W. 2,500 S.F. of R.O.W. 2,488 S.F. of R.O.W. TOTAL S.F. R.O.W. WEED ABATEMENT 28,483 -1- pwO3Xroads\wkcmpltd\95\Og.W==ds 100395 DATE 10-17-95 10-23-95 LOCATION Main Street @ Pujol Winchester @ Enterprise Circle South CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION TREE TRIMMING OCTOBER, 1995 I Trimmed Trimmed WORK COMPLETED I Tree I Tree TOTAL TREES TRIMMED 2 -1- pwO3~oads~,wkcmpi~\95\lO.Trees 110~95 DATE 10-06-95 10-10-95 10-11-95 10-16-95 10-16-95 10-17-95 10-20-95 10-23-95 10-24-95 10-24-95 10-26-95 10-26-95 10-26-95 10-27-95 10-27-95 10-30-95 10-30-95 10-31-95 10-31-95 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS LOCATION La Colima @ N. Gen. Kearney Margarita @ T.V.U.H.S. McCabe Butterfield Stage N/B Pauba Target Center on Rancho California Road Main Street @ Pujol Pio Pico @ Calle Rendova Winchester @ Enterprise Circle South Via Norte @ Del Rey Road Nicolas W/O N. General Kearney Santiago @ Margarita Winchester @ Enterprise Circle South Margarita @ Via la Vida ' Solana Way @ Via Norte Winchester @ Enterprise Circle South Corte Sierra @ Loma Linda Margarita @ Rustic Glen Margarita @ Rustic Glen Rising Hill ROADS DIVISION OCTOBER, 1995 SIGNS t Replaced Replaced Replaced Installed Replaced Replaced Installed Installed Replaced Replaced Replaced Replaced Replaced Replaced Replaced Installed Replaced Replaced Replaced TOTAL SIGNS REPLACED TOTAL SIGNS INSTALLED TOTAL SIGNS REPAIRED .WORK COMPLETED W-45 "T.C." SR4 Graffiti W-65 "T.C." W-17 "Missing" 6 Delineators R-1 Graffiti 2 N.W.S. R-18, R-18-2, 5 Delineators R-1 Graffiti R-2 "50" "T.C." "P" Marker "Missing" R-7, R-7 A "T.C." Type "N" & Carsonite 2 R-1A "Missing" I Delineator N.H.W. 3 Carsonites W-56 & Type "N" W-31 & Type "N" 2__7 1__1 PW03~I.0AI)S/m,VKCMl~LTD\95~I0.SIGNXINSTA.IJ., 110295 TRAFFIC DIVISION Monthly Activity Report For October, 1995 TRAFFIC REQUESTS and PLAN CHECKS Submitted by: Joseph Kicak Prepared by: Marty Lauber Date: November 15, 1995 TRAFFIC REQUESTS: August Sept Oct Received 3 13 14 Completed 4 8 11 Active 23 24 28 Scheduled for Traffic Commission 2 2 7 WORK ORDERS ISSUED. I I 4 STRIPING PLANS REVIEWED 7 2 3 TRAFFIC CONTROL PLANS REVIEWED' 1 0 .1 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDIES REVIEWED 2 I 0 NOTE: Traffic Signal Plans for the Western Bypass at I st Street and Front Have also been reviewed. II. DIVISION PROJECTS: As We are researching available Traffic Accident Reporting software to automate enhanced data retrieval and plotting opportunities. All optional programs will accelerate both Police and Traffic Engineering operations. We have developed new traffic analysis zones (TAZ) for our local travel forecast model. WRCOG has selected the Southwest area Planning District (SWAPD) as the first regional area to be updated and connected directly to the conforming model in Riverside. This completes Phase One of this Three Phase Project. r:~no~ctt~t\trtffic\9~\O| .oct APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER /~ CITY MANAGER · TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT November 28, 1995 Monthly Report RECOMMENDATION: Discussion: Caseload Activity: Receive and File The following is a summary of the Planning Department's caseload and project activity for the month of October 1995: The Department received 12 applications for administrative cases and 2 applications for public hearing cases for the month of October: Parcel Map 1 Revised Permit 1 TOTAL 2 Ongoing Projects: Old Town Streetscape Improvement Project: As part of their work on the Sixth Street parking lot, Webb & Associates will be designing the offsite improvements and standards for the related components of the project. These will then be used as design standards for off-site improvement in Old Town. Desion Guidelines: A field trip with the City's consultant, Design Guideline Committee and staff was held September 25, 1995. Draft design guidelines preparation is underway. Development Code: The Planning Commission has completed the public hearing process. The Council will review the Code on November 28, 1995. Murd¥ Ranch Specific Plan and Environmental Impact Report: Staff has reviewed the revised Specific Plan and is preparing comments for the applicant to address. The screen check draft EIR has not yet been submitted for review. R:\MONTHLY.RPT~I995\OCT 11116195 vgw Johnson Ranch Specific Plan: This item will be scheduled for a public hearing after the City Council takes action on Annexation policies for the City. These policies are currently being formulated and will be presented to the City Council as soon as they are completed. RoriDauah Ranch Soecific Plan: The Planning Commission held a public workshop on September 11, 1995 and directed the applicant to reduce the density and the total number of units as well as to be more sensitive to the surrounding land use by increasing the buffer area and providing a transition of lot sizes. The Commission provided additional direction to the applicant. No future hearing date has been established. Attachment: 1. Revenue and Status Report - Page 3 R:~.MOIfI'I-ILY.RFI~!995\OCT 11116195 v~w 2 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 REVENUE STATUS REPORT R:\MONTHLY.ILPTXI995\OCT 11/16/95 vpt 3 REVPRIN2 11/06/95 001 161 ACCOUNT # 4101 4102 4103 4104 4105 4106 4107 4108 4109 4110 4111 4112 4113 4114 4115 4116 4117 4118 4119 4120 4121 4122 4123 4124 4125 4126 4127 4128 4129 4130 4131 4132 4133 4134 4135 4136 4137 4138 4139 4140 4141 4142 4143 4144 4145 4146 15:20:30 GENERAL FUND PLANNING DESCRIPTION AMENDED FINAL MAP APPEALS CERT. OF LAND DIV. COMPLIANCE EXTENSION OF TIME SINGLE'FAMILY TRACTS MULTI-FAMILY TRACTS PARCEL MAPS LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT MINOR CHANGE PARCEL MERGER (2-4 LOTS) RECORDABLE SUBDIVISION MAPS REVERSION TO ACREAGE (5+LOTS) SPECIAL SERVICE LETTER SECOND UNIT PERMITS CHANGE OF ZONE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CONSISTENCY CHECKS GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT PLOT PLAN PUBLIC USE PERMIT REVISED PERMIT SETBACK ADJUSTMENT SPECIFIC PLAN SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMANCE TEMORARY OUTDOOR EVENT TEMPORARY USE PERMIT VARIANCE ZONING INFORMATION LETTER CEGA (INITIAL STUDIES) CEQA ENVIROMENT IMPACT REPORT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT GEOLOGY CEQA GEOLOGY ORD, 547 APZ LAFCO PARCEL MAP/WAIVER MERGER AMENDED FINAL TRACT/PAR, MAP CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION CONDO TRACT NAP REVERSION TO ACREAGE LOT REVISION AFTER CHECK LOT LINE ADJUST, PLAN CHECK CERT, OF CORRECT, PLAN CHECK CERT, OF COMPLIANCE PLAN CHECK COND. CERT, OF COMPL, PLN. CK, CERT,' OF PAR, MERGER PLAN CK CITY OF TEMECULA REVENUE STATUS REPORT OCTOBER 1995 ADJUSTED ESTIMATE .00 325.00 800.00 6,000.00 6,850.00 5,332.00 8,996.00 1,380.00 940.00 1,000.00 .00 392.00 .00 520.00 13,256.00 29,248.00 4,440.00 4,827.00 57,190.00 10,765.00 6,446.00 1,250.00 9,254.00 1,715.00 2,548.00 .00 1,142.00 .00 .00 6,202.00 4,000.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 784.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 OCTOBER REVENUE .00 .00 100.00 268.00 .00 .00 547.00 690.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 528.00 .00 590.00 .00 .00 .00 30.00 .00 .00 .00 578.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 1995-96 REVENUE .00 325.00 300.00 1,676.00 .00 .00 2,120.00 920.00 .00 .00 .'00 .00 .00 .00 2,746.00 590.00 .00 4,128.00 8,8~2.00 4,297.00 2,272.00 250.00 .00 2,358.30 268.00 .00 571.00 .00 4,098.35 .00 4,000.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 500.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 PAGE 1 BALANCE % COL .00 .00 100.0 500.00 37.5 4,324.00 27.9 6,850.00 0.0 5,332.00 0.0 6,876.00 23.6 460.00 66.7 940.00 0.0 1,000.00 0.0 .00 392.00 0.0 .00 520.00 0.0 10,510.00 20.7 28,658.00 2.0 4,440.00 0.0 699.00 85.5 48,348.00 15.5 6,468.00 39.9 4,174,00 35.2 1,000.00 20.0 9,254.00 (:~3.30-1 2,280.00 .00 571.00 50.0 .00 4,098.35- *** 6,202.00 0.0 .00 100.0 .00 .00 .00 .00 500.00- *** .00 .00 .O0 784.00 0.0 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 REVPRIN2 11/06/95 ACCOUNT # 4147 4148 4149 4150 4151 4152 4153 4154 4155 4156 4157 4169 4170 4175 4180 4200 4206 4226 4260 4261 4262 4369 15:20:30 GENERAL FUND PLANNING DESCRIPTION VACATIONS PLAN CK DOCUMENT PROCESSING CONDEMNATION PLAN CHECK REVERSION TO ACRE. PLAN CHECK PARCEL MAP PLAN CHECK TRACT MAP PLAN CHECK AMENDED MAP PLAN CHECK 4TH & SUBS. SUBMITTALS FENA STUDY REVIEW LONA REVIEW DRAINAGE STUDY REVIEW IMPROVE iNSPECTiON ON-SiTE K-RAT STUDY FEES FAST TRACK PLANNING FORHA FAST TRACK IN HOUSE PLAN CHECKS ANNEXATION FEES TEMPORARY USE PERMIT ACCESSORY WiND ENERGY LARGE FAMILY DAY CARE HAZARDOUS WASTE FACZLZTY LAND DIV UNiT MAP LANDSCAPE PLAN CHECK CITY OF TEMECULA REVENUE STATUS REPORT OCTOBER 1995 ADJUSTED ESTIMATE .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 1,480.00 .00 .00 10,045.00 710.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 748.00 .00 OCTOBER REVENUE .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 500.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 740.00 1995-96 REVENUE .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ,00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 3,020.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 187.00 5,110.00 PAGE BALANCE .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 1,480.00 .00 .00 7,025.00 710.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 561.00 5,110.00- % COL 0.0 30.1 0.0 25.0 PLANNING 198,585.00 4,571.00 48,578.65 150,006.35 24.5