HomeMy WebLinkAbout92_028 PC ResolutionATTACHMENT NO. 1
RESOLUTION NO. 92-028
A RESOLUTION OF ~ PLANNING COMMISSION OF
~ CITY OF TEMECULA APPRO.VING CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT NO. 17 TO PERMIT OPERATION OF A 1,200
SQUARE FOOT VETERINARY CLINIC IN AN EXISTING
BUIIJ~ING LOCATED AT 41915 MOTOR CAR PARKWAY,
/ti.
~, Dr. Bob Thompson, D.V.M. filed Condition Use Permit No. 17 in
accordance with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision OrdinanCes,
which the City has adopted by reference;
wm*.REAS, said Conditional Use Permit application was processed in the time and
manner prescribed by State and local law;
WI~.REAS, the Planning Commission considered said Conditional Use Permit on June
1, 1992, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or
opposition;
WI~.REAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, the Commission
recommended approval of said Conditional Use Permit;
NOW, TI~O~, ~ PLANNING COMMISSION OF ~ CITY OF
TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section I. Findings.
following findings:
That the Temecula Planning Commission hereby makes the
A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly incon.~orated city shall
adopt a general plan within thirty (30) months following incorporation. During that 30-month
period of time, the city is not subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or the
requirements of state law that its decisions be consistent with the general plan, if all of the
following requirements are met:
general plan.
The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of the
2. The planning agency finds, in approving projects and taking other actions,
including the issuance Of building permits, each of the following:
a. Thrre is a reasonable probability that the land use or action
proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which
will be studied within a reasonable time.
b. There is little or no probability of substantial detximent to or
interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately
inconsistent with the plan.
c. The proposed use or action complied with all other applicable
requirements of state law and local ordinances.
B. The Riverside County General Plan, as amended by the Southwest Area
Community Plan, (hereinafter "SWAP") was adopted prior to the incorporation of Temecula as
the General Plan for the southwest portion of Riverside County, including the area now within
the boundaries of the City. At this time, the City has adopted SWAP as its General plan
guidelines while the City is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of its General
Plan.
C. The proposed Conditional Use Permit is consistent with the SWAP and meets the
requirements set forth in SectiOn 65360 of the Government Code, to wit:
D. The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with a preparation of the general plan.
E. The Planning Commission finds, in approving projects and taking other actions,
including the issuance of building permits, pursuant to this rifle, each of the following:
1. There is reasonable probability that Conditional Use Permit No. 17
proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which
will be studied within a reasonable time. The proposed veterinary clinic is consistent with the
existing C-1/C-P zoning for the site and consistent with the SWAP designation of Commercial.
2. There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference
with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with
the plan. The proposed veterinary clinic is consistent with existing zoning, SWAP, and the
existing development of the surrounding area.
3. The proposed use or action complies with all other applicable requirements
of state law and local ordinances. The proposed use complies with Ordinance No. 348 and the
action complies with State Planning Laws.
F. Pursuant to Section 18.26(e), no Conditional Use Permit may be approved unless
the applicant demonstrates the proposed use will not be detrimental to the health, safety and
welfare of the community, and further, that any Conditional Use Permit approved shall be
subject to such conditions as shall be necessary to protect the health, safety and general welfare
of the community.
G. The planning Colnmission, in approving the proposed Conditional Use Permit,
makes the following Findings, to wit:
1. There is a reasonable probability that Conditional Use Permit No. 17 will
be consistent with the City's future General Plan, which will be completed ia a reasonable time
and in accordance with State law due to the fact that the proposed veterinary clinic is consistent
with the existing zoning of General Commercial and the SWAP land use designation of
Commercial.
2. There is not a likely probability of substantial detriment to or interference
with the future General Plan, if the proposed use is ultimately inconsistent with the plan due to
the fact that the proposed veterinary clinic is consistent with the existing General Commercial
zoning, the SWAP land use designation of Commercial, and existing development in the
surrounding area.
3. The proposed use or action complies with State planning and zoning laws
due to the fact that the proposed use complies with Ordinance No. 348 and the action complies
with State Planning Laws.
4. The site is suitable to accommodate the proposed land use in terms of the
size, access, and intensity of use due to the fact that the pwposed development complies with
the standards of Ordinance No. 348.
5. The project as designed and conditioned will not adversely affect the public
health or welfare due to the fact that the Conditions of Approval include measures which will
ensure that public health and welfare will be maintained.
6. The project is compatible with surrounding land uses. The harmony in
intensity creates a compatible physical relationship with adjoining properties due to the fact that
the proposed development is consistent with current surrounding development and Ordinance No.
348.
7. The proposal will not have an adverse effect on surrounding property,
because it does not represent a significant change to the present or planned land use of the area
due to the fact that the surrounding properties are zoned C-1/C-P (General Commercial) which
is consistent with the project zoning and proposed use.
8. The project has acceptable access to a dedicated right-of-way which is open
to, and useable by, vehicular traffic due to the fact that the interior circulation is suitable and
connects with Ynez Road and Motor Car Parkway.
9. The project as designed and conditioned will not adversely affect the built
or natural environment. The project is a Class 1 Categorical Exemption pursuant to the CEQA
Guidelines.
10. The desigfl of the project and the type of improvements are such that they
axe not in conflict with easements for access through or use of the propen'y within tho proposed
project as represented on the site plan.
H. As conditioned pursuant to SECTION 11I, the Conditional Use Permit proposed
is compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community.
Section H. Environmental Compliance. The proposed Conditional Use Permit is a Class I
Categorical Exemption pursuant to Section 1503(e)(1) of the CEQA Guidelines which pertains
to minor alternations to existing structures.
Section HI. Conditions. The City of Temecula Planning Commi.qsion hereby approves
Conditional Use Permit No. 17 for the operation of a 1,200 square foot veterinary clinic located
at 41915 Motor Car Parkway,/fl subject to the following conditions:
1. Attachment No. 2, attached hereto.
Section IV. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this Ist day of June, 1992.
I WERERy CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the planning
Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 1st day of June,
1992 by the following vote of the Commission:
AYES: 4 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: BLAIR, CHINIA~FF, FORD,
HOAGLAND
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 1
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
FAHEY