HomeMy WebLinkAbout94_017 PC Resolution ATTACHMENT NO. 1
PC RESOLUTION NO. 94-17
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMNIISSION OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. 94-0022, SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 219, AMENDMENT
NO. 4; AN AMENDMENT TO SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 219 TO ADJUST THE
BOUNDARY FOR PLANNING AREAS 1, 6, 37 AND CHANGE THE
ACREAGE FOR MAJOR ROADS, AND TO MAKE ALL THE SECTIONS
OF THE SPECIFIC PLAN CONSISTENT WITH EACH OTHER BY
MAKING MINOR CHANGES TO THE GRAPHICS AND THE TEXT OF
THE SPECIFIC PLAN AS A RESULT OF THIS AMENDMENT. THIS
ADJUSTMENT IN ACREAGE WELL INCREASE THE NUMBER OF
DWELLING UNITS IN PLANNING AREA 6 FROM 492 TO 590. THE
PROJECT IS LOCATED SOUTH OF PAUBA ROAD, EAST OF
MARGARITA ROAD, NORTH OF STATE HIGHWAY 79 AND WEST OF
BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD.
WHEREAS, KRDC, Inc. filed Planning Application No. 94-0022, Specific Plan No.
219, Amendment No. 4, in accordance with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning
and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference;
WHEREAS, said applications were processed in the time and manner prescribed by State
and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered said application on June 6, 1994, at
which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, the Commission
recommended approval of said application;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Findings. That the Temecula Planning Commission hereby makes the
following findings:
A. The Planning Commission in recommending approval of said application makes
the following findings, to wit:
1. Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No. 4 is consistent with the City's
General Plan, due to the fact that the subject request is in substantial conformance with Specific
Plan No. 219, Amendment No. 3.
RASTAFFRYM19SP.PC &9/94 klb 6
n •
2. The project is compatible with surrounding land uses of schools and single
family residential since it is separated by wide streets with substantial landscaping to reduce the
visual impacts. Other impacts have been reduced to a level of insignificance.
3. The proposal will not have an adverse effect on surrounding property,
because it does not represent a significant change to the planned land use of the area, due to the
fact that the proposed land use is consistent with the overall concept of Specific Plan No. 219,
Amendment No. 3.
4. The changes proposed in the approved Specific Plan are minor and do not
increase the impacts associated with the development, the overall intensity of the development
as analyzed in Environmental Impact Report 235, and it's subsequent Addendum. Moreover,
the mitigation measures prepared for this EIR will be applied to this project.
5. The proposed project is consistent with the Agreement reached between
the City of Temecula and KRDC, Inc.
B. As conditioned pursuant to Section 3,
Section 2. Environmental Con lilt ance• Previously certified Environmental Impact
Report No. 235 and its subsequent Addendum analyzed the significant impacts of Specific Plan
No. 219 and proposed mitigation measures to reduce these impacts. Since this project is
proposing seven (7) fewer dwelling units than the original project for which the EIR was
prepared, no further environmental analysis is required.
Section 3. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby
recommends approval of Planning Application No. 94-W22, Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment
No. 4, located south of Pauba Road, north of State Highway 79, west of Butterfield Stage Road
and east of Margarita Road subject to the following conditions:
A. Attachment No. 2, attached hereto.
R:WAFFRYM19SP.PC "/94 12 7
Section 4. PASSED, APPROVED AND this 6th y of June, 1994.
STIEVEN J. FORD
CHAIRMAN
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 6th day of June
1994 by the following vote of the Commission:
AYES: 4 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: BLAIR, HOAGLAND, SALYER
AND FORD
NOES: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: 1 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: FAHEY
Z''_
G Y THORNHILL
SECRETARY
RASTAFFRPM193P.PC 6/9/94 k% 8