HomeMy WebLinkAbout93_026 PC ResolutionATTACHMENT NO. 1
RESOLUTION NO. 93-26
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. 93-0179, AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO
CONSTRUCT A SECOND UNIT ON A PARCEL
CONTAINING 5.23 ACRES LOCATED AT 31550 CALLE
GIRASOL AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.
914-480-006
WHEREAS, Raymond and Odette Derobert and Michelle Hapoit fried Planning
Application No. 93-0179 in accordance with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning
and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference;
WHEREAS, said Planning Application was processed in the time and manner prescribed
by State and locai law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered said Planning Application on
November 1, 1993, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time
interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or in opposition;
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and
arguments, if any, of all persons deserving to be heard, said Commission considered all facts
relating to Planning Application No. 93-0179, Amendment No. 1;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct.
Section 2. Findings. That the Temecula Planning Commission hereby makes the
following findings:
A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly incorporated city shall
adopt a general plan within thirty (30) months following incorporation. During that 30-month
period of time, the city is not subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or the
requirements of state law that its decisions be consistent with the general plan, if all of the
following requirements are met:
general plan.
The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of the
2. The planning agency finds, in approving projects and taking other actions,
including the issuance of building permits, each of the following:
R:\S\STAFFRPT~179PA93.PC 11/5193 Idb 7
a. There is a reasonable probability that the land use or action
proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which
will be studied within a reasonable time.
b. There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or
interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately
inconsistent with the plan.
c. The proposed use or action complies with all other applicable
requirements of state law and local ordinances.
B. The Riverside County General Plan, as amended by the Southwest Area
Community Plan, (hereinafter "SWAP") was adopted prior to the incorporation of Temecula as
the General Plan for the southwest portion of Riverside County, including the area now within
the boundaries of the City. At this time, the City has adopted SWAP as its General Plan
guidelines while the City is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of its General
Plan.
C. The Planning Commission, in approving of the proposed Planning Application,
makes the following findings, to wit:
1. There is reasonable probability that Planning Application No. 93-0179 -
Second Unit Permit proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered
or studied or which will be studied within a reasonable time.
2. There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference
with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with
the plan.
3. The proposed use or action complies with all other applicable requirements
of state law and local ordinances. The proposed project is consistent with Ordinance No. 348.
The project meets the criteria prescribed under Section 18.28.a. (Second Unit Permi0 of
Ordinance No. 348.
4. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the
public health, safety and general welfare; conforms to the logical development of the land and
is compatible with the present and future logical development of the surrounding property. The
project meets the criteria prescribed under Section 18.28.a. (Second Unit Permit) of Ordinance
No. 348. The proposal will not have an adverse effect on surrounding property, because it does
not represent a significant change to the present or planned land use of the area. The project
conforms with applicable land use and development regulations.
5. The proposed project will not have a significant impact on the environment
since the project is a Class 3 Categorical Exemption pursuant to the California Environmental
Quality Act.
R:\S\STAFFRPT~179PA93.PC 11/5/93 idb 8
A. As conditioned pursuant to Section 3, the Planning Application proposed conforms
to the logical development of its proposed site, and is compatible with the present and future
development of the surrounding property.
Section 3. Environmental Compliance. The proposed project will not have a significant
impact on the environment since the project is a Class 3 Categorical Exemption pursuant to the
California Environmental Quality Act.
Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby
approves Planning Application No. 93-0179, Amendment No. 1 to construct a second dwelling
unit located at 31550 Calle Girasol and known as Assessor's Parcel No. 914-480-006 subject to
the following conditions:
A. Exhibit A, attached hereto.
Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 1st day of November, 1993.
CHAIRlVIAN
I ]{EREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 1st day of
November, 1993 by the following vote of the Commission:
AYES:
4 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: BLAIR, FAHEY, HOAGLAND
AND FORD
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 0
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
SECRETARY
R:\S\STAFFRPTH79PA93.PC 11/5/93 idb 9