HomeMy WebLinkAbout91_070 PC Resolution RESOLUTION NO. 91-70
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVED PLOT PLAN NO. 225 TO
PERMIT CONSTRUCTION OF A TWO STORY WAREHOUSE
WITH SALES/DISPLAY AREA LOCATED ON THE
WESTERLY SIDE OF ENTERPRISE CIRCLE NORTH
APPROXIMATELY 380 FEET WEST OF THE SOUTHERLY
INTERSECTION OF ENTERPRISE CIRCLE NORTH AND
WINCHESTER ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S
PARCEL 909-281-004.
WHEREAS, Leonard Nagel filed Plot Plan No. 225 in accordance with the
Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision Ordinances, which the
City has adopted by reference;
WHEREAS, said Plot Plan application was processed in the time and
manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered said Plot Plan on July
15, 1991, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in
support or opposition;
WHEREAS, atthe conclusion of the Commission hearing, the Commission
approved said Plot Plan;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Findings. That the Temecula Planning Commission hereby
makes the following findings:
A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly
incorporated city shall adopt a general plan within thirty (30) months
following incorporation. During that 30-month period of time, the city
is not subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or the
requirements of state law that its decisions be consistent with the
general plan, if all of the following requirements are met:
(1) The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the
preparation of the general plan.
A:PP225 1
(2) The planning agency finds, in approving projects and
taking other actions, including the issuance of building
permits, each of the following:
(a) There is a reasonable probability that the land
use or action proposed will be consistent with
the general plan proposal being considered or
studied or which will be studied within a
reasonable time.
(b) There is little or no probability of substantial
detriment to or interference with the future
adopted general plan if the proposed use or
action is ultimately inconsistent with the plan.
(c) The proposed use or action complied with all
other applicable requirements of state law and
local ordinances.
B. The Riverside County General Plan, as amended by the
Southwest Area Community Plan, (hereinafter "SWAP") was adopted
prior to the incorporation of Temecula as the General Plan for the
southwest portion of Riverside County, including the area now within the
boundaries of the City. At this time, the City has adopted SWAP as its
General Plan guidelines while the City is proceeding in a timely fashion
with the preparation of its General Plan.
C. The proposed Plot Plan is consistent with the SWAP and
meets the requirements set forth in Section 65360 of the Government
Code, to wit:
(1) The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with a
preparation of the general plan.
(2) The Planning Commission finds, in approving projects
and taking other actions, including the issuance of building
permits, pursuant to this title, each of the following:
a) There is reasonable probability that Plot Plan
No. 225 proposed will be consistent with the
general plan proposal being considered or
studied or which will be studied within a
reasonable time.
A:PP225 2
b) There is little or no probability of substantial
detriment to or interference with the future
adopted general plan if the proposed use or
action is ultimately inconsistent with the plan.
c) The proposed use or action complies with all
other applicable requirements of state law and
local ordinances.
D. (1) Pursuant to Section 18.30(c), no plot plan may
be approved unless the following findings can be made.
a) The proposed use must conform to all
the General Plan requirements and with
all applicable requirements of state law
and City ordinances.
b) The overall development of the land is
designed for the protection of the
public health, safety and general
welfare; conforms to the logical
development of the land and is
compatible with the present and future
logical develo ~ment of the surrounding
property.
(2) The Planning Commission, in recommending
approval of the proposed Plot Plan, makes the
following findings, to wit:
a) (LIST STAFF REPORT FINDINGS)
E. As conditioned pursuant to SECTION 3, the Plot Plan
proposed conforms to the logical development of its proposed
site, and is compatible with the present and future development
of the surrounding property.
SECTION 2. Environmental Compliance.
An Initial Study prepared for this project indicates that although
the proposed project could have a significant impact on the environment,
there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation
measures described in the Conditions of Approval have been added to
the project, and a Negative Declaration, therefore, is hereby granted.
A:PP225 3
SECTION 3. Conditions.
That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby approves Plot
Plan No. 225 for the operation and construction of a warehouse/display building
located on the westerly side of Enterprise Circle North approximately 380 feet west
of the southerly intersection of Enterprise Circle North and Winchester Road subject
to the attached Conditions of Approval.
A. Exhibit A, attached hereto.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of July, 1991.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by
the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held
on the 15th day of July, 1991 by the following vote of the Commission:
AYES: 5 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS
NOES: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS
ABSENT: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS
A:PP225 4