Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout91_014 PC Resolution RESOLUTION NO. 91-14 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING OF REVISION NO. 2 TO PLOT PLAN NO. 10579 TO OPEN A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED "GUEST USE" ONLY RESTAURANT TO THE PUBLIC ON A PARCEL CONTAINING 8.7 ACRES LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF RANCHO CALIFONIA ROAD AND YNEZ ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 944-020-001 WHEREAS, Bedford Properties filed Revision No. 2 to Plot Plan No. 10579 in accordance with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference; WHEREAS, said Revised Plot Plan application was processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing pertaining to said Revised Plot Plan on February 25, 1991, at which time interested persons had opportunity to testify either in support or opposition to said Plot Plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission received a copy of the Staff Report regarding the Revised Plot Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Findin.cts. That the Temecula Planning Commission hereby makes the following findings: A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly incorporated city shall adopt a general plan within thirty (30) months following incorporation. During that 30-month period of time, the city is not subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or the requirements of state law that its clecisions 13e consistent with the general plan, if all of the following requirements are met: (1) The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of the general plan. (2) The planning agency finds, in approving projects and taking other actions, including the issuance of building permits, each of the following: (a) There is a reasonable probability that the land use or action proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which will be studied within a reasonable time. STAFFRPT\PP10579. RP2 6 (b I There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future / adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with the plan. (c) The proposed use or action complied with all other applicable requirements of state law and local ordinances. B. The Riverside County General Plan, as amended by the Southwest Area Community Plan, (hereinafter "SWAP") was adopted prior to the incorporation of Temecula as the General Plan for the southwest portion of Riverside County, including the area now within the boundaries of the City. At this time, the City has adopted SWAP as its General Plan guidelines while the City is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of its General Plan. C. The proposed Revised Plot Plan is consistent with the SWAP and meet the requirements set forth in Section 65360 of the Government Code, to wit: (1) The City is proceeding in a timely fashion with a preparation of the general plan. (?) The Planning Commission finds, in approving projects and taking other actions, including the issuance of building permits, pursuant to this title, each of the following: a) There is reasonable probability that Plot Plan No. 10579 Revision No. 2 as proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which will be studied within a reasonable time. b) There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with the plan. c) The proposed use or action complies with all other applicable requirements of state law and local ordinances. D. (1) Pursuant to Section 18.30(c), no plot plan may be approved unless the following findings can be made: a) The proposed use must conform to all the General Plan requirements and with all applicable requirements of state law and City ordinances. b) The overall development of the land is STAFFRPT\PP10579. RP2 7 designed for the protection of the public health, safety and general welfare; conforms to the logical development of the land and is compatible with the present and future logical development of the surrounding property. (2) The Planning Comrnission, in approvingthe proposed Revised Plot Plan, makes the following findings, to wit: a. There is a reasonable probability that this project will be consistent with the City's General Plan, which will be completed in a reasonable time and in accordance with State Law due to the fact that the project is in conformance with existing and anticipated commercial land use and design guideline standards. b.. There is not a likely probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future and adopted General Plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with the plan, due to the fact that it conforms with present or planned land use of the area and is consistent with the Southwest Area Plan and Specific Plan 180. c. The proposed use or action complies with State Planning and Zoning laws, due to the fact that the proposed use conforms with those uses listed as "allowed" within the existing Specific Plan Designation of Office/Professional. d. The site is suitable to accomodate the proposed land use in terms of size and shape of lot configuration,parking circulation and access due to the fact that adequate area is provided for the proposed use and parking and circulation as designed are in conformance with City Standards, also internal circulation, traffic conflicts and landscaping were addressed in the original Conditions of Approval of Plot Plan No. 10579. e. The project as designed and conditioned will not adversely affect the public health, safety or welfare due to the fact that the proposed project is compatible with surrounding land uses and conditions stated in the approval are based on measures necessary to reduce or STAFFRPT\PP10579. RP2 8 eliminate potential adverse impacts of the project. f, The proposal will not have an adverse effect on the surrounding property because it does not represent a significant change to the original approval or the present or planned land use. g. Said findings are supported by maps, exhibits and documents associated with this application and are herein incorporated by reference due to the fact that they are referenced in the attached Staff Report. Exhibit and Conditions of Approval. E. As conditioned pursuant to SECTION 3, the Plot Plan ,proposed conforms to the logical development of its proposed site. and ~s compatible with the present and future development of the surrounding property, SECTION 2. Environmental Compliance. SECTION 3. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby approves Revision No. 2 to Plot Plan No, 10579 to open a previously approved "guest use" only restaurant to the public located on the southwest corner of Rancho California Road and Ynez Road and known as Assessor's Parcel No, 944-020-001 subject to the following conditions: A. Exhibit A, attached hereto, SECTION 4, PASSED. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 25th day of February. 1991, CHINIAEFF CHAIRMAN STAFF RPT\PP10579. R P2 9 I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 25th day of February. 1991 by the following vote of the Commission: AYES: A~ PLANNING COMMISSIONERS NOES: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS STAFFRPT\PP10579. RP2 10