HomeMy WebLinkAbout121301 PTS AgendaIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the
office of the City Clerk at (909) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable
arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR35.102.35.104 ADA Title 11]
AGENDA
TEMECULA PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION
TO BE HELD AT
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California
Thursday, December 13, 2001 at 6:00 P.M.
CALL TO ORDER:
FLAG SALUTE
ROLL CALL:
PRESENTATION:
Sr. Deputy Goss, School Resource Officer
PUBLIC COMMENTS
COMMISSIONERS: Coe, Connerton, Katan, Lanier
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Commission on items that are not
listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Commission
about an item not listed on the Agenda, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with
the Commission Secretary.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address.
For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the Recording Secretary before the
Commission gets to that item. There is a three (3) minute time limit for individual speakers.
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one vote.
There will be no discussion of these items unless members of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission request
specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action.
COMMISSION CONSENT CALENDAR
1. Minutes of Sevtember 27, 2001 and October 25, 2001
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1
1.2
Approve the Minutes of September 27, 2001
Approve the Minutes of October 25,2001
COMMISSION BUSINESS
2. Red Curb - Nantes Court
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission receive the staff report and provide direction to
staff.
3. Turn Restrictions - Rancho Vista Road at Temecula Valley High School
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 That thc Public/Traffic Safety Commission receive the staff report and provide further
direction to staft~
4. Traffic Conditions - Butterfield Road
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission:
l. Deny the request to install Multi-Way Stop Signs at the intersection of Butterfield
Stage Road and Jerez Lane; and
2. Recommend to the City Council the installation of Multi-Way Stop Signs at the
intersection of Butterfield Stage Road and De Portola Road; and
3. Deny the request to lower the existing speed limit from 55 MPH and 50 MPH to 45
MPH on Buttcrfield Stage Road; and
4. Deny the request to establish two-ton weight limit restrictions on Butterfield Stage
Road.
5. Roadway Stril~in~ - Jefferson Avenue at Primecare Buildim~ Driveway
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1 That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission receive and file the staff report.
7.
8.
9.
Traffic Engineer's Report
Police Chief's Report
Fire Chief's Report
Commission Reports
ADJOURNMENT
The next regular meeting of the City of Temecula Public/Traffic Safety Commission will be held on Thursday,
January 24, 2002, at 6:00 P.M., Temecula City Hall, Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Dhve,
Temecula, California.
2
ITEM NO. 1
MINUTES OF A REGULAR
MEETING OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION
SEPTEMBER 27, 2001
CALL TO ORDER
The City of Temecula Public/Traffic Safety Commission convened in a regular meeting
at 6:00 P.M., on Thursday, September 27, 2001, in the City Council Chambers of
Temecula City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
FLAG SALUTE
The audience was led in the Flag salute by Commissioner Katan.
ROLL CALL
Present:
Commissioners Connerton, Katan, and Vice
Chairman Lanier.
Absent:
Commissioners Coe and Edwards.
Also Present:
Director of Public Works Hughes,
Senior Engineer Moghadam,
Associate Engineer Gonzalez,
Police Sergeant DiMaggio,
Police Sergeant Steger,
Minute Clerk Hansen,
Minute Clerk Ice.
PRESENTATIONS
Temecula Police Department's Crime Prevention Proqram - Community Services Officer
Lynn Fanene
Via distribution of the Crime Prevention Unit's Program Guide, Officer Fanene provided
an overview of the Crime Prevention Program, noting the four steps defining crime
prevention, as follows: 1) anticipation, 2) recognition, 3) an appraisal of a crime risk, and
4) the initiation of some action to remove or reduce this risk; relayed the historical
objectives of crime prevention which were to stamp out the existing crime, and to
prevent outbreaks of crime in the future; provided an overview of his training and
experience related to this field; highlighted the programs in Temecula regarding crime
prevention, as follows: The Neighborhood Watch Program, Business Security Survey,
Child StrangedDanger Program, the McGruff Truck Program, the McGruff Crime Dog
Presentation Program, Station Tours, Personal Safety Operation I.D., Site Plan Checks,
and Temporary Conditional Use Permits; and read into the record the Crime Prevention
Unit's mission statement (as written in the City of Temecula Police Department Crime
prevention Unit's Program Guide).
For Commissioner Connerton, Officer Fanene relayed that he attends the Neighborhood
Homeowner Association meetings when he is invited, noting that typically there are
R:\trafficminutes\092701 1
~revious arrangements with the Board Members; and relayed the process if a specified
area is experiencing a crime increase, noting the initiation of a Neighborhood Watch
Program and the Problem-Oriented Policing Team's involvement; and for Commissioner
Lanier, confirmed that the Citizen's Action Patrol would have a positive impact with
respect to crime prevention.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
The following individuals expressed concern regarding traffic impacts proximate to the
Promenade residential development:
Mr. Craig J. Turner
Ms. Danielle Ortega
41777 Carleton Way
41854 Carleton Way
representing the Promenade HOA
The above-mentioned individuals relayed the following comments regarding traffic
concerns in the Promenade neighborhood:
Noted concern regarding the location of the entrance/exit of the upcoming corporate
development, specifically relaying concern regarding the potential for this traffic to
cut-though the Promenade residential tract.
Recommended the installation of plastic delineators (similar to the devices installed
proximate to Lowe's), which would prevent traffic coming from the Promenade tract
from making left-turns onto Margarita Road, and additionally restrict U-turns on
Margarita Road in this area.
Applauded the Police Depadment for the excellent presentation presented at the
recent Neighborhood Watch meeting.
Submitted copies of a petition to the Public/Traffic Safety Commission signed by
residents in this area which had been previously submitted to staff (per agenda
material).
For Commissioner Connerton, Police Sergeant DiMaggio relayed that a traffic calming
program has been initiated in the Carleton Way area; and noted that the next time the
radar trailer is placed in this area he would collect the speed survey data for presentation
to the Public/Traffic Safety Commission at a future meeting.
The following individuals expressed concern regarding the extent of the use of the
Temecula Middle School as a spods park:
Ms. RoseMarie Cathcart 32115 Cala Torrente
Ms. Pat Chalkley 42843 Camino Alagon
Mr. Gene Chalkley 42843 Camino Alagon
The above-mentioned individuals relayed concern regarding the use of Temecula Middle
School as a sports park for the following reasons:
Noise, traffic, and parking Impacts.
The safety of the neighborhood children with this plethora of traffic.
The negative impacts related to the lowering of property values.
Littering.
The additional traffic impacts in this area due to church parking.
.-' Noted the 44 scheduled hours for practice weekly (for football and soccer) at this
school site.
· -' The restrictions this parking places on potential emergency vehicles accessing the
neighborhood.
· -' While commending the Police Department for the recent increased enforcement,
relayed that as soon as the Police Officers leave the area, the illegal parking
continues (which was confirmed by Police Sergeant DiMaggio.)
· -' Recommended permitting on-street parking on Meadows Parkway when the
construction is completed.
· -' Noted the general support of the neighborhood regarding the implementation of
parking restrictions.
· -' Requested that the City construct additional sports parks.
For Commissioner Lanier, Senior Engineer Moghadam confirmed Mr. Chalkley's
comments, specifically that the Community Services Department stated that while there
will be efforts made to attempt to reduce the number of games and practices at this
school site, that there is no guarantee that this will be feasible at this time; and advised
that the Public Works Department concurs with Mr. Chalkley's concerns.
Recommending that the Police Department increase enforcement in this area,
Commissioner Connerton requested staff to agendize this matter for a future meeting.
COMMISSION CONSENT CALENDAR
1. Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the Minutes of May 24, 2001.
MOTION: Commissioner Connedon moved to approve Consent Calendar Item No. 1.
The motion was seconded by Commissioner Katan and voice vote reflected approval
with the exception of Commissioners Coe and Edwards who were absent.
COMMISSION BUSINESS
2. Sl~eed Limit - Valleio Avenue and Jedediah Smith Road
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1
That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommend that the City
Council adopt an ordinance establishing a 35 MPH speed limit on Vallejo
Avenue and Jedediah Smith Road.
Senior Engineer Moghadam presented the staff report (of record), noting the request
from Mr. Larry Markham, representing the Los Ranchitos Homeowners Association
(HOA), to establish a speed limit on Vallejo Avenue; relayed the results of the traffic
surveys inclusive of speed data, volume data, accident history, and other conditions,
noting that the surveyed speeds varied from 39-43 MPH; advised that a speed limit
established between 35-40 MPH would be supportable, relaying staff's recommendation
to establish a 35 MPH speed limit due to other conditions present (i.e., the lack of a
sidewalk, horizontal alignment of these streets, the narrow roadway sections, and the
residential land use of the area); and noted that the highest volumes of traffic were on
the podion of Vatlejo Avenue between Ynez Road and Jedediah Smith Road.
Mr. Larry Markham, 30105 Cabrilio Avenue, representing the Los Ranchitos HOA,
thanked staff for addressing this matter expeditiously; and concurred with staff's
recommendation to post the speed limit at 35 MPH.
.MOTION: Commissioner Connerton moved to approve staff's recommendation. The
motion was seconded by Commissioner Katan and voice vote reflected approval with the
exception of Commissioners Coe and Edwards who were absent.
3, In-Pavement Amber LED Flashincl Liqhts for Crosswalks
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1
That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission receive the status report and
provide further direction to staff.
Noting that while it had been previously relayed by the representative for the in-
pavement amber LED flashing lights for crosswalks would be approved as a Uniform
Traffic Control Device by the State of California on/or about December of 2000, Director
of Public Works Hughes relayed that to date the device still has not been accepted as an
official traffic control device; provided an overview of the necessity of having a uniform
standard for traffic control devices throughout the State, clarifying that typically all types
of improvements constructed, and all types of traffic control utilized in the City of
Temecula were consistent with uniform design standards; advised that in the few
instances where uniform design standards were not being utilized, staff had conducted
its own engineering studies, verifying that a proper process was conducted;
acknowledged that this particular device was being utilized in a few areas as test cases;
and clarified that at this time there was no standard, no uniformity, and no criteria
regarding this device, additionally noting that there was no severe negative traffic impact
currently in the City of Temecula which this device would improve.
Commissioner Connerton relayed two recommended areas for installation of this device,
noting that when traveling down Meadows Parkway, coming down the hill from Rancho
California Road (towards La Serena) there is an area where pedestrians cross the street
to access the sports park, and from La Serena towards the sports parks there is a blind
curve which restricts the line-of-sight view of any pedestrian crossing in this area,
advising that these two areas would be appropriate areas for testing the device; relayed
that this device has been placed in other cities, noting that there is evidence that the
installation has reduced traffic fatalities by seventy percent (70%); and advised that
since the safety of the residents should be foremost, that unless this device is
demonstrated as a hazard, it was his opinion that a recommendation for installation
should be forwarded to the City Council.
Concurring that safety was the greatest concern of the Public Works Department,
Director of Public Works Hughes clarified that uniform traffic standards were developed
to ensure that the devices used are safe, and recognizable by all motorists utilizing the
streets; recommended that if the location mentioned by Commissioner Connerton is a
specific concern, that staff be directed to review that site and provide recommendations
R:\bafficminut e s\092701 4
on how to best address the situation; advised that the fact that other agencies were
using the device was not a significant factor in determining whether the City of Temecula
should install the device, specifically without thorough analysis, noting certain situations
where the device could cause a hazard, relaying that pedestrians will most likely cross
with the understanding that this would be a safe crossing, whereas motorists are not
likely to recognize the installation.
Advising that due to the location of the park site at the previously-noted location,
Commissioner Connerton relayed his concern regarding the improbability that children
would walk 300 yards to cross at an intersection; recommended that after additional
review by staff this installation be agendized for the next Public/Traffic Safety
Commission meeting, advising that by the time the installation was approved by the City
Council the device would most likely have been approved by Caltrans.
For Director of Public Works Hughes, Senior Engineer Moghadam noted that the
previously-referenced location could be studied and agendized for the next Public/Traffic
Safety Commission meeting; and advised that if this device was ultimately installed as a
test site, as suggested by Commissioner Connerton, that there was no data to compare
for a before/after installation analysis (i.e., no traffic accidents at this site), Commissioner
Connedon noting the benefit regarding taking proactive action after identifying a
potential problem area.
Commissioner Katan queried whether there was data available regarding installing the
device in a school zone or as a traffic calming device; and queried whether staff would
be more willing recommend installation in these applications as a test site.
With respect to installing the device as a traffic calming tool, Director of Public Works
Hughes relayed that he had no knowledge of any studies regarding utilizing the devise
for this purpose; with respect to installing the device in a school zone, recommended
that these installations be evaluated on a case-by-case basis, relaying that the School
District was also governed by standards; reiterated that if there were specific areas of
concern of the Public/Traffic Safety Commissioners, that staff would investigate those
locations.
Commissioner Katan requested that when staff reviewed the previously-noted area for
the feasibility of installing the device, that if staff was of the opinion that this location
would not be best-suited for the installation that staff would recommend an alternate site
that would be more appropriate for testing the device.
Director of Public Works Hughes clarified that it would most likely be staff's
recommendation to not install this device until it is a uniformly-approved standard device;
advised that this device would be best placed in an area with a high volume of traffic, as
well as a high volume of pedestrian movements, and that there be no existing controlled
traffic signal crossing, relaying that at this time there were no locations in the City with
these elements; for Commissioner Connerton, noted that on Old Town Front Street (at
5th and 6th Streets) the condition was, as follows: there were reasonable traveled speeds,
and the visibility on the route was good; and relayed that typically where there were high
volumes of traffic there were not high pedestrian counts.
In response to Commissioner Connerton, Senior Engineer Moghadam relayed that Old
Town Front StreetJ6~h Street was controlled via multi-way stop signs; and for
R:\trafficminutes\092701 5
Commissioner Katan, noted that due to there being no guidelines for this device, it would
not be feasible for staff to determine where these devices would be appropriate, and
cause a greater benefit rather than a hazard.
Relaying caution, Director of Public Works Hughes provided additional information
regarding the liability risks associated with installing a device for experimentation rather
than utilizing a uniform traffic control device, reiterating that this device was untested,
and that the majority of motorists and pedestrians would not recognize the device.
Commissioner Connerton noted that the State of Oregon has utilized the device,
reiterating the positive impacts resulting from the installations; and advised that based
on his experience (reviewing the devices installed in Orange County) he was convinced
that the device would be effective in the City of Temecula.
For clarification, Director of Public Works Hughes advised that the State of California
had one of the highest standards for safety equipment in the world, reiterating that if the
Public/Traffic Safety Commission had concerns regarding a specific location that staff be
directed to review these areas and bring back recommendations, clarifying that safety
was the greatest concern of staff.
Commissioner Katan concurred with Commissioner Connerton with respect to being
proactive regarding the installation of the device, relaying that while there was risk
involved with these other cities that have installed the device, there was additionally the
potential for the public to be safer.
For Commissioner Katan, Director of Public Works Hughes.advised that the vendor for
this product had clearly stated that this device was not for use at signalized
intersections.
Concurring with the benefits of taking proactive action, Vice Chairman Lanier noted that
along with the location at Meadows Parkway (proximate to the sports park)
recommended to be investigated by Commissioner Connedon, that the area on
Meadows Parkway where pedestrians cross to access the Vintage Hills Pool might be
well-suited for future installation of this device, concurring with the benefits of testing the
device with an initial installation.
MOTION: Commissioner Connerton moved to recommend that staff provide traffic
solution recommendations to the. Public/Traffic Safety Commission regarding the
Meadows Parkway crossing proximate to the sports park, inclusive investigating the
feasibility of installing the in-pavement amber flashing LED lights, and that the issue be
agendized for the next Public/Traffic Safety Commission meeting; and directed staff to
develop a criteria for creating additionally safety solutions at similar crossings in the City.
The motion was seconded by Commissioner Katan and voice vote reflected approval
with the exception of Commissioners Coe and Edwards who were absent.
TRAFFIC ENGINEER'S REPORT
Senior Engineer Moghadam updated the Public/Traffic Safety Commission
regarding the signals now in operation, listed as follows: a signal at
Diaz/Winchester Roads, North General Kearny (proximate to the middle school),
and two existing signals which had been on flashing status during construction
R:\tCaf~cminutes\092701 6
which were now operating at Margaita/Pio Pico Roads, and Margarita/DePortola
Roads; and for Vice Chairman Commissioner Lanier, confirmed that the signal at
Margarita/Stone Wood Roads was also operating.
POLICE CHIEF'S REPORT
Police Sergeant DiMaggio advised that Police Sergeant Steger would be would
be assuming his responsibilities within the traffic division since he would be
moving on to the administrative sect[on of the department; and noted that
Lieutenant Pingel would be in charge of the traffic division.
Commissioner Connerton thanked Police Sergeant DiMaggio for his excellent
work with the Public/Traffic Safety Commission, noting that he would be greatly
missed.
With respect to the Keep Kids Afive, Drive 25 Program, Police Sergeant
DiMaggio relayed that there would be a meeting regarding this program on
October 11th from 1:00 P.M. to 3:30 P.M. in San Diego at the San Diego County
Library located at 700 Eucalyptus Avenue in the City of Vista.
Police Sergeant DiMaggio noted that the Rod Run in Old Town would begin on
September 28, 2001, noting that there would be street closures for this event;
relayed that the following weekend (October 5-7) would De the Tractor Race
Event; advised that in October there would be the Susan G. Komen Breast
Cancer Race; and noted the December events to be held in Old Town were
approaching.
For Commissioner Connerton, Police Sergeant DiMaggio relayed that the Safety
Exposition Event was held approximately every two years; noted that grant
monies would most likely be received in November, relaying that with this funding
Child Safety Fairs would be held at the schools, and free bicycle helmets would
be distributed.
In response to Commissioner Connerton, Police Sergeant DiMaggio noted that
the Stop Red Light Abuse Program (SLAP) was still in effect; and additionally
relayed that a new Neighborhood Enforcement Team (NET) Officer would soon
De added to the Police Department, advising that the test for that position would
be held on October 10th.
Police Sergeant Steger introduced himself to the Public/Traffic Safety
Commission, providing a brief history of his experience; and advised that he
looked forward to serving on the dais during the Public/Traffic Safety
Commission meetings as the Police Department's representative.
Commissioner Lanier, echoed by Commissioner Connerton, welcomed Police
Sergeant Steger aboard.
FIRE CHIEF'S REPORT
No comments.
COMMISSION REPORTS
For Commissioner Katan, Senior Engineer Moghadam relayed that staff would
investigate the timing of the signal at the left-hand turn pocket on Rancho
California Road/Ynez Road (traveling westbound).
After Commission discussion it was the general consensus of the Public/Traffic
Safety Commission to request that Commissioner Connerton's appointment to
the General Plan Update Committee as the Public/Traffic Safety Commission
representative be withdrawn since he would be serving as an appointee of
Councilman Stone, recommending that Chairwoman Edwards be appointed as
the Public/Traffic Safety Commission representative.
Commissioner Connedon requested that staff provide information to the
Public/Traffic Safety Commission regarding any road improvements for review,
additionally relaying that it was his intent to request the City Council to direct the
Public/Traffic Safety Commission to review the scheduling of lane closures
during street repairs, citing specific instances of concern regarding emergency
vehicle access.
Director of Public Works Hughes clarified that the turnaround time for many traffic
controls plans would not allow for the time it would take for the Public/Traffic
Safety Commission to review the data, noting that on numerous occasions the
traffic control plans are not developed until the staging of the construction is
known, which at times is after the award of the contract and into the construction
phase; recommended that the Public/Traffic Safety Commission aid in
developing policy and/or guidelines regarding this issue, but not become part of
the review process due to the time constraints; advised that the Public Works
Department was approving traffic control plans on a daily basis; and clarified that
the Public Works Department coordinates with the Fire and Police Department
regarding road closures and restricted lanes.
in response, Commissioner Connerton requested that the issue of setting policy
regarding this matter be agendized prior to spring.
Senior Engineer Moghadam queried whether Commissioner Connerton would
desire to attend the pre-construction meetings. In response, Commissioner
Connerton relayed that he would be willing to attend the pre-construction
meetings for major projects as the Public/Traffic Safety Commission
representative, if this was the desire of the Commission.
For Vice Chairman Lanier, Senior Engineer Moghadam relayed that staff would
investigate the feasibility of increasing the capacity of the eastbound left-hand
turn pocket on Rancho California Road (between Cosmic Drive and Yukon
Road.)
R:\trafficminutes\092701 8
~n response to Vice Chairman Lanier, Police Sergeant DiMaggio relayed that he
would investigate the feasibility of the CAP Team displaying the speed of passing
vehicles in an attempt to make drivers more aware of their speeds and slow the
vehicles.
ADJOURNMENT
At 7:59 P.M. Vice Chairman Lanier formally adjourned this meeting to Thursday,
October 25, 2001 at 6:00 P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park
Drive, Temecula.
Chairwoman Maryann Edwards
Administrative Secretary Anita Pyle
R:ltra~ficminutes\092701 9
CALL TO ORDER
MINUTES OF A REGULAR
MEETING OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION
OCTOBER 25, 2001
The City of Temecula Public/Traffic Safety Commission convened in a regular meeting
at 6:01 P.M., on Thursday, October 25, 2001, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula
City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
FLAG SALUTE
The audience was led in the Flag salute by Commissioner Coe.
ROLL CALL
Present:
Absent:
Present:
PUBLIC COMMENTS
No comments.
PRESENTATIONS
Domestic Violence - Serqeant Rile
Commissioners Coe, Connerton, Katan, Lanier,
and Chairwoman Edwards.
None.
Director of Public Works Hughes,
Director of Community Services Parker,
Senior Engineer Moghadam,
Associate Engineer Gonzalez,
Battalion Chief Ritchey,
Police Sergeant Steger,
Administrative Secretary Pyle,
Minute Clerk Hansen, and
Minute Clerk Ice.
It was noted that this item would be postponed.
COMMISSION CONSENT CALENDAR
1. Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the Minutes of July 26, 2001.
MOTION: Commissioner Connerton moved to approve Consent Calendar Item No. 1.
The motion was seconded by Commissioner Katan and voice vote reflected approval
with the exception of Commissioner Coe who abstained.
COMMISSION BUSINESS
2. Request for Parkinq Restrictions - Camino Ala~lon
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1
That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission receive the report and provide
direction to staff.
Chairwoman Edwards advised that she would be abstaining with regard to this item,
ergo stepped down from the dais, Vice Chairman Lanier presiding.
Noting that it was requested that this matter be agendized at the September 27, 2001
Public/Traffic Safety Commission meeting, Senior Engineer Moghadam provided the
staff report (of record), relaying that staff has had several meetings with representatives
of the Camino Alagon neighborhood to discuss the negative parking issues, as well as
noise and littering impacts; noted that several solutions were discussed (i.e., permitted
parking, limited parking, parking allowed on Meadows Parkway when the construction in
this area is completed); clarified that it was staffs opinion that if permitted parking was
implemented the negative parking impacts would be moved to other neighborhoods;
advised that staff has established various no parking zones via painting the curbs red in
order to alleviate various safety issues; and relayed that per discussions with Director of
Community Services Parker, it was noted that while a few of the sporting activities
scheduled at the Temecula Middle School could be re-scheduled to other facilities, it
would not be feasible to eliminate all the activities at this sports park due to the lack of
available alternate sites.
In response to Vice Chairman Lanier, Police Sergeant Steger confirmed that the Police
NET Officers have increased enforcement in this area.
Addressing the queries of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission, Director of Community
Services Parker confirmed that the Community Services Department has been notified
of the situation, noting that staff has had discussions with Mr. Chalkley, as well as other
residents, regarding the negative parking impacts; relayed that typically the sports
activities end by 10:00 P.M.; and noted that this sports park has been a lighted facility
since approximately 1994, or 1995, relaying that at that time there were no residences
proximate to the sports park (school site).
At this time the public was invited to speak
Mrs. Pat Chalkley, 42843 Camino Alagon, relayed that while the residents were aware of
the location of the school when opting to purchase a home in this area, that they were
not aware that the school would be utilized as a City park; thanked City staff for their
efforts regarding this matter; via photographs, demonstrated that drivers were not
adhering to the restricted parking areas (red curbs); and read a letter written by her
husband, Mr. Gene Chalkley, outlining their concerns regarding this matter (provided via
supplemental agenda material), recommending that there be temporary parking
restrictions restricting all street parking on Saturday from 7:00 A.M.-7:00 P.M., and
additionally recommending that street parking been allowed on Meadows Parkway
(when construction is completed), Sunny Meadows Drive, Pauba Road, and the full
length of McCabe Drive.
In response to Commissioner Connerton, Mrs. Chalkley noted that she has lived in this
area four-and-a-half years ago; clarified that pad of the problem was the lack of courtesy
regarding those parking in her neighborhood (i.e., littering, parking in resident's
driveways, double-parking); relayed that due to the heavy congestion, access to
emergency vehicles would be restricted; noted her desire to limit the amount of games
scheduled at this facility, recommending that additional parks be constructed; and for
Commissioner Katan, confirmed that it was the desire of the majority of residents that
the parking be restricted on Saturdays.
Concurring with staff's comments, Commissioner Coe relayed that if parking was
restricted in this particular neighborhood, the negative parking impacts would not be
resolved, but would be affecting an alternate neighborhood.
Ms. Linda Weimann, representing Temecula Valley Pop Warner Football, specified the
schedule when Pop Warner utilizes this particular field, noting that the facility was used
on 12 Saturdays per year; acknowledged that while the residents may be
inconvenienced from the scheduled sports activities, that these activities have been
taking place long before the residences were located in this area, ergo the residents
should have been aware of the situation prior to purchasing homes in this area; noted
that the negative parking impacts have worsened due to the construction of Meadows
Parkway; noted that the School District has denied a request to permit parking on the
basketball courts; and relayed hopes of the parking impacts being significantly
decreased when the Meadows Parkway construction is completed, when the public
street parking backing the new homes becomes available, as well as when a park
parking lot is built (across Meadows Parkway).
In response to Commissioner Connerton, Ms. Weimann relayed that in order to address
the littering issue, she walks or drives the neighborhood to clean up the debris left;
confirmed that the parents of the youth involved in the sports activities have been
notified regarding the littering, noting that she would additionally direct the parents to not
empty coolers in the neighborhood; for Commissioner Katan, relayed that practices for
Pop Warner Football were scheduled at Temecula Elementary School, the sports park,
as well as Temecula Middle School, clarifying that Temecula Middle School was the
home field, noting the organization's investment at this site (i.e., the snack bar, the
purchase of a scoreboard); relayed the efforts made to schedule the majority of games
to end at dusk, advising that for special activities the field was utilized until 10:00 P.M.;
and for Commissioner Connerton, specified that there were 750 participants in the Pop
Warner activities.
Mr. Mark Bailey, 44763 Calle Banuelos, representing Pop Warner Football, urged the
Public/Traffic Safety Commission to not restrict the use of this much-needed field for
youth activities; and suggested placing barricades (i.e., sawhorses) on Saturdays to
alleviate the parking problems.
For Commissioner Coe, Director of Community Services Parker advised that per past
discussions with the School District the school officials have been reluctant to allow
parking on the school blacktop, citing concerns with respect to oil drippings and damage
to the courts; and relayed that this issue could be addressed with the School District
again.
Mr. Les Walter, 32110 Cala Torrente, noted the traffic congestion due to parents
dropping off and picking up their children between 7:45 A.M.-8:15 A.M. and from 2:40
P.M.- 3:10 P.M., relaying the illegal maneuvers these drivers commit on a regular basis
(i.e., parking in red zones and in front of fire hydrants, double parking, illegal U-turns,
blocking driveways, vehicles consistently turning around via pulling into the driveways);
recommended that parents be required to drop off/pick up their children on McCabe
Drive until the construction is completed on Meadows Parkway; additionally
recommended that when the construction is complete, that the parking of vehicles and
the drop off/pick up of children be allowed along Meadows Parkway; and requested that
a Police Officer be assigned to the area in the A.M./P.M. hours previously noted.
Ms. Rose Marie Cathcart, 32115 Cala Torrente, thanked Ms. Weimann for her
cooperation in attempting to address this matter; read a letter she had written into the
record (as per agenda material), addressing her concerns; offered gratitude for the
recent red-curb painting, specifying an area where she would recommend extending the
red curb (at the southern intersection of Camino Alagon and Cala Torrente); reiterated
the desire of the residents to restrict parking, noting the petition signed by 82 residents
(of record); relayed the plethora of vehicle violations committed in this area which
created a safety hazard; reiterated alternate parking recommended areas; and
recommended that the school site access be controlled via locking the gate at the
northern border which could be closed after school hours.
The Public/Traffic Safety Commission beqan its deliberations
Addressing the queries of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission, Senior Engineer
Moghadam noted that the developer-driven construction on Meadows Parkway was
scheduled to be completed by approximately November; advised that the decision to
allow parking on Meadows Parkway has not yet been determined, noting that if a bike
lane is installed, parking would be prohibited, additionally relaying the potential for
danger if parents drop off their children on the opposite side of the street, and the
children subsequently cross this busy roadway to access the school; and noted that prior
to the construction on Meadows Parkway, he was not aware of staff receiving a
significant amount of complaints regarding this parking issue.
In light of the construction on Meadows Parkway, Commissioner Coe noted his
reluctance to place parking restrictions at this time, advising that the situation may
improve; and noted that the residents purchased homes with the knowledge that this
was a lighted spods field.
For Commissioner Connerton, Director of Community Services Parker relayed that there
were approximately 18 active facilities (inclusive of the elementary and middle school
site) for sports league activities, serving approximately 7,600 participants; and noted that
locking the existing gate at the school (after school hours) could be addressed with the
School District.
In response to Commissioner Connerton, Police Sergeant Steger noted that on
Saturdays an Officer has been assigned to this neighborhood, relaying that citations are
R:\trafficrc~nutes1102501 4
being issued; confirmed that if yellow- or white-curbed areas were installed and backed
by City Ordinance, that the parking restrictions would be enforceable; and confirmed that
if an Officer was present, vehicles would receive citations for parking at red-curbed
areas.
Lieutenant Pingel noted that due to the multiple responsibilities of the Police
Department, it would not be feasible to have an Officer present in this one particular
neighborhood for all of the hours the negative parking impacts were occurring; advised
that the Police Department has been working with the residents in this area to alleviate
their concerns; confirmed that when the Police leave the neighborhood, the illegal
parking and moving violations continue; concurred that approaching the School District
to request that parking be permitted on site would most likely aid in addressing this
matter; and noted that since Police presence could not be constant, white- and yellow-
curbed parking areas may not solve the issue.
Noting that these particular residents have expended the time and effort to address their
concerns with City staff, and the Public/Traffic Safety Commission, Commissioner Coe,
echoed by Commissioner Connerton, implored the Police Department to increase
enforcement in this neighborhood, advising that if the Police presence is increased and
citations are issued, the violations will most likely decrease.
In response, Lieutenant Pingel clarified that the Police Department has received the Pop
Warner League schedule and has been aggressively citing violators in this neighborhood
during the past month.
Commissioner Connerton noted that when there have been Police staffing issues in the
past, the Public/Traffic Safety Commission has made recommendations to the City
Council to increase the Police personnel.
Vice Chairman Lanier noted that he had visited the neighborhood on Saturday to
investigate the parking impacts, relaying that the parking in the neighborhood began
early (prior to 7:15 A.M.); relayed his reluctance to support permitted parking due to the
likelihood of just relocating the parking impacts to alternate neighborhoods; suggested
that the Pop Warner League request the parents to drop off their children at the double
wide gate on McCabe Drive; and to first park on McCabe Drive and Sunny Meadows
Drive; advised that since the football season would be ending in approximately two
weeks it was his opinion that a long-term solution be sought after this season.
In response to Commissioner Connerton, Senior Engineer Moghadam noted that to
install a loading zone on McCabe Drive, the matter would need to be presented to the
City Council, and subsequently it would take approximately a month for an ordinance to
be passed, Director of Public Works Hughes relaying that the next City Council meeting
was scheduled in three weeks; advised that along with the increased Police
enforcement, informing the parents of the neighborhood issues would most likely be the
best avenue to obtain the most immediate relief; and noted that while staff could
expedite the painting of white-curbed areas to a week's time, the Police Officers would
not be able to enforce the parking restrictions until the City Council took action regarding
the matter.
Noting that the School District was responsible for this matter, Commissioner Coe
advised that it was his opinion that since there was parking available on site, it should
R:ltrafficminutes\102501 5
made available immediately; and recommended that the School District increase the
fees to utilize the field to mitigate any damage to the blacktop, if necessary.
Commissioner Katan advised that since the Meadows Parkway construction was
anticipated to end in November, that the matter be addressed by the Public/Traffic
Safety Commission after that time period; and concurred with Commissioner Coe,
relaying that the School District should be requested to allow parking on site, reiterating
that he would contact the School District Traffic Committee Members tomorrow.
MOTION: Commissioner Connerton moved to recommend that the School District be
requested to lock the gate on Camino Alagon after school hours, and to allow parking on
the school site during sporting activities; and recommended that staff investigate an
avenue for implementing a loading zone to minimize the negative parking impacts. The
motion was seconded by Commissioner Coe. (Ultimately this motion passed; see
below.)
Vice Chairman Lanier recommended that the Pop Warner League representatives
encourage parents to utilize McCabe Drive.
In response to Senior Engineer Moghadam, Commissioner Connerton recommended
that loading zone be installed at the location of the double-gated entry on McCabe Drive,
and that staff determine the appropriate length of the zone.
At this time voice vote was taken reflecting approval with the exception of Chairwoman
Edwards who abstained
Commissioner Connerton thanked all the residents for taking the time to address their
concerns with the Public/Traffic Safety Commission.
3. In-Pavement Amber Flashincl Liclhts for Crosswalks - Meadows Parkway
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1
That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission receive the report and provide
direction to staff.
Senior Engineer Moghadam presented the staff report (via agenda material), specifying
that staff had evaluated various traffic alternatives related to crossings, advising that
none of the criteria was met for installing these control devices at this particular location
(Meadows Parkway/Cafera Lane); noted that most of these traffic control devices were
designed for locations further than 600 feet of a controlled crosswalk; relayed that during
the observations, only two students were seen crossing at Meadows Parkway/Oafera
Lane, noting that staff has received only one complaint since Meadows Parkway has
opened, and that there have been no reported accidents; with respect to the comments
raised by the Public/Traffic Safety Commission at the last meeting regarding the concern
with respect to the lack of visibility due to the vegetation and the curvature of the
roadway, advised that while staff concurred that if a driver stopped at the existing limit
line the visibility would be limited, noted that observations revealed that almost none of
the vehicles stopped at the limit line but rolled into a position with additional visibility;
advised that the following implementations could be installed: 1) due to the location of
the limit line, the line could be relocated to a position allowing better visibility, 2) due to
the width of Meadows Parkway, a five-foot wide bike lane could be painted so vehicles
would be further from the curb line, and 3) the measurement of the site distance at the
location of approximately ten feet behind the extension of the curb line on Meadows
Parkway provided visibility of five hundred and ten feet (510"), which would be within the
safe stopping site distance; noted that staff counted 22 similar crossing locations within
the City, advising that currently, pedestrians utilized caution when crossing; noted the
concerns related to the in-pavement flashing lights device for crosswalks, relaying that
the installation would provide a false sense of security, inhibiting pedestrians from
exercising due caution, reiterating that there was no criteria (guidelines) or warrants for
this device, relaying that to utilize this location as a test site for the device would not
preclude the City from liability issues; reiterated that staff's recommendation would be to
utilize standardized traffic controls (i.e., a pedestrian signal, an all-way stop, flashing
lights that indicate an approaching crossing), when warranted; and noted that while this
particular location did not meet the warrants for the installation of any traffic control
device, that if it was the Public/Traffic Safety Commission's desire, the Commission
could recommend installation of one of these devices.
For Commissioner Lanier, Senior Engineer Moghadam noted that the evaluation of this
location did not take place during the roadwork project at Parducci Lane and Meadows
Parkway; for Commissioner Coe, advised that in the last two years there have been no
pedestrian incidents in/or around crosswalks within the jurisdiction of Temecula
(additional information was provided regarding the accident occurring on a State
Highway within City limits which was caused by the driver having a medical condition);
noted that costs for the in-pavement flashing lights for crosswalks at one intersection
would be approximately $36,000 [Commissioner Connerton specifying that at the last
presentation it was indicated that a single (two directional) crosswalk would cost
approximately $17,000-$20,000].
In response to Commissioner Connerton, Senior Engineer Moghadam provided
additional information regarding mid-block crossings which are provided in school zones,
confirming that there were no standards in the State of California regarding mid-block
non-school crossings; clarified that at controlled intersections (inclusive of T-
intersections) there is a passive crosswalk existing even if not marked; noted that the
criteria for evaluating the crossing at Meadows Parkway was based on warrants for a
mid-block school crossing since this was the only data available.
Commissioner Connerton specified the mid-block crossings in the City of Anaheim,
which were not within school zones, relaying that in the State of Oregon installation of
the in-pavement flashing lights resulted in a seventy percent (70%) reduction in
accidents and fatalities. In response, Senior Engineer Moghadam relayed that if high
volumes of pedestrians were crossing mid-block, that a jurisdiction would seek an
avenue for creating safety; advised that at the Meadows Parkway location there were no
high volumes of pedestrians crossing, reiterating that staff would not recommend
installation of the in-pavement flashing lights due to the device not being a standardized
control device.
Providing additional information, Director of Public Works Hughes noted that there were
various agencies that would use measures that are warranted in their opinion, exercising
their own judgment in implementing any type of traffic control device (inclusive of one
which was not a standardized traffic control device); clarified that City staff has
investigated the areas the Public/Traffic Safety Commission requested to have analyzed
for installation of the in-pavement amber lights, advising that the evaluation determined
that there were no high volumes of pedestrians, clarifying that it was the professional
judgment of staff that the device installed at this particular location could cause a greater
hazard than benefit with respect to safety; noted that due to this particular device not
being recognized by all motorists, there was the potential to cause a degree of
confusion, advising that if there was a mid-block crossing with high volumes of traffic it
would be his recommendation to install a signalized crossing, and not this particular
device due to safety issues; and clarified that the best control for providing pedestrian
protection was for the individuals to use reasonable caution; and noted the danger of
installing an un-warranted device with no State standardization.
For Commissioner Connerton, Director of Public Works Hughes noted that for a device
to be standardized, the State of California adopts the device as a uniform traffic control
device, and at that time guidelines are adopted, providing direction with respect to how
and where the device should be used; confirmed that in various cases, part of the
warrant analysis included injured or fatalities; and provided additional information
regarding the purpose of warrant analysis.
In response to Commissioner Katan, Senior Engineer Moghadam relayed that the
previously-noted similar locations were primarily locations with an attraction on the
opposite side of the street in residential areas; confirmed that it was staffs opinion that
there was not a single location in the City of Temecula where this particular device would
serve a benefit, reiterating that he was unaware of any location in the City where there
was an uncontrolled crossing with a potential safety hazard; and reiterated the criteria
which was used in the evaluation.
For Commissioner Katan, Director of Public Works Hughes reiterated the rationale for
staff being reluctant to recommend installation if this particular device in the City of
Temecula, as follows: 1) the device has not been approved by the State, ergo no
guidelines have been adopted, 2) if there was a crossing with high pedestrian volumes,
there were more effective devices for addressing the matter, 3) there was not an
appropriate location in the City for this device, clarifying that there was no location where
the installation would create greater safety; and advised that he could not support
recommendation to the City Council for installation of the device.
Referencing the adage "If it ain't broke -- don't fix it," Commissioner Coe advised that
since there was no negative impact that needed addressing regarding this issue, there
was no need for a solution; concurred with staff that if there was a crossing with a high
volume of pedestrians, a signal would be the most appropriate solution; with respect to
the cost of the device recommended that the money could be better utilized to place
reflectors on Rainbow Valley Road, and other curved roadways; and advised that he
would not support a recommendation for installing this device.
Noting that he visited the evaluated site, Commissioner Lanier concurred with staff that
this location was not an appropriate location for this particular device.
Reviewing the charge of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission and the safety issues at
hand, Commissioner Connerton relayed that he was in strong support of recommending
installation of the in-pavement amber flashing lights for crosswalks.
Based on the analysis conducted, Chairwoman Edwards reiterated that there were no
pedestrian incidents, no complaints, and a minimal amount of pedestrian travel; advised
that the device not being Caltrans' approved was an additional concern of hers, as well
as the potential liability issues.
MOTION: Commissioner Connerton moved to recommend the installation of the in-
pavement flashing crosswalk lights at Meadows Parkway/Cafera Lane on both sides of
the road. (Ultimately this motion died for lack of a second.)
MOTION: Commissioner Lanier moved to direct staffto continue monitoring this device;
to update the Commission as to changes; and upon approval of the device by Caltrans
for staff to bring forward to the Public/Traffic Safety Commission any potential locations
in the City where the installation would be appropriate. The motion was seconded by
Commissioner Coe. (Ultimately this motion passed; see below,)
Commissioner Connerton noted that if the motion did not include the need for approval
by Caltrans, he could support the motion.
At this time voice vote was taken reflecting approval with the exception of Commissioner
Connerton who voted n_9o.
In response to Senior Engineer Moghadam, Chairwoman Edwards relayed that it was
the consensus of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission for staff to follow-through with
staff's recommendations regarding relocating the limit line, and striping a bike lane, as
previously noted.
4. Commission Meetincl Schedule - November and December of 2001
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1
That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission direct the Secretary to cancel
and reschedule the regular meetings for November and December 2001,
and to perform the appropriate postings and noticing requirements per the
Government Code.
MOTION: Commissioner Lanier moved to direct the Secretary to reschedule the
November and December meetings, scheduling one meeting to be held on December
13, 2001. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Coe and voice vote reflected
unanimous approval.
TRAFFIC ENGINEER'S REPORT
Updating the Public/Traffic Safety Commission, Director of Public Works Hughes
relayed that Caltrans has prepared a Draft Project Report for the Interchange
Project north of Winchester Road, which was in the final comments stage, and
was expected to be approved in 2002.
POLICE CHIEF'S REPORT
No comments.
R:\tra fficrninutesl102501 9
FIRE CHIEF'S REPORT
No comments.
COMMISSION REPORTS
Minute Clerk Hansen noted that Mrs. Chalkley had requested that the following
comments be read into the record: 1) thanked staff and the Public/Traffic Safety
Commission for their efforts regarding her neighborhood, and 2) noted that the
Police Department has been doing wonderful work in the Camino Alagon area.
For Commissioner Coe, Senior Engineer Moghadam relayed that staff would be
installing raised pavement markers in various areas in the City, noting that the
installations could begin on Rainbow Canyon Road.
Commissioner Connerton requested that the ingress/egress at the Prime Care
use be agendized, advising that re-striping this area may create a safer
condition.
Commissioner Lanier, echoed by Chairwoman Edwards, commended the Police
Department, and Fire Department for their efforts at the Susan G. Komen Race
for the Cure Event.
For Chairwoman Edwards, Senior Engineer Moghadam noted that in the newly
annexed Vail Ranch area there were various crosswalks in school zones without
crossing guards, advising that staff would be addressing this issue with the
School District.
Per residential complaints she has received, Chairwoman Edwards requested
staff to investigate placing a crosswalk and crossing guard at Butterfield Stage
Road/Jerez Lane. In response, Associate Engineer Gonzales noted that the
correct avenue for addressing this issue would be to contact the School District.
Chairwoman Edwards requested that the speed trailer be placed on Camino
Piedra Rolo. In response, Associate Engineer Gonzales noted that this request
has already been forwarded to the Police Department.
Noting that in light of the upcoming School Board election (which she was
campaigning for) and due to her appointment expiring, Chairwoman Edwards
advised that this could be her last meeting, relaying that it had been a pleasure to
serve on the Public/Traffic Safety Commission.
In light of Chairwoman Edwards, and Commissioner Connerton being up for re-
appointment, Commissioner Coe noted that it had been an honor to work with the
Commissioners, and that they had been an asset to the community
R:\tra fncminu/esl102501 10
ADJOURNMENT
At 8:32 P.M. Chairwoman Edwards formally adjourned this meeting to Thursday,
December 13, 2001 at 6:00 P.M. (in light of the November and December meetings
being rescheduled), in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive,
Temecula.
Chairwoman Maryann Edwards
Administrative Secretary Anita Pyle
R:\trafficrr*nutes\102501 1 ~
ITEM NO. 2
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
AGENDA REPORT
Public/Traffic Safety Commission
//~i Moghadam, P.E., Senior Engineer, Traffic
December 13, 2001
Item 2
Red Curb - Nantes Court
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission receive the staff report and provide direction to staff.
BACKGROUND:
Staff received a letter request from Mr. John Scudder, 43560 Nantes Court, to consider the possibility of
removing a newly painted red curb located on Nantes Court between 43560 and 43570 Nantes Court. The
public has been notified of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission's consideration of this issue through the
agenda notification process and by mail.
In October, staff received a request from Mr. John Snell, 43570 Nantes Court, to review the possibility of
restricting parking in an area between two driveways to allow for better ingress and egress into their driveway.
Mr. Snell's concern was that the driveway was frequently blocked during the loading and unloading of Abby
Reinke school children. Since the distance between the two driveways is only 12 feet and additional parking is
available in the area, staff agreed to paint the curb red thereby, restricting the on-street parking.
Based on the new information presented in Mr. Scudder's letter dated November 27, 2001, staff is requesting
that the Public/Traffic Safety Commission provide further direction to staff after receiving testimony from all
affected property owners.
HSCAL IMPACT:
Attachment:
1. Exhibit "A" - Location Map
2. Exhibit "B" - Letter from Mr. Scudder dated November 27, 2001.
3. Exhibit "C' - Site Plan
r:\Waffic~commis sn~agenda~2001 \ 1213 hNantes Courffajp
EXHIBIT "A"
LOCATION MAP
EXHIBIT "B"
LETTER FROM MR. SCUDDER DATED
NOVEMBER 27, 2001
Date: Tuesday, November 27, 2001
To: Traffic Engineer
Ali Moghadan
RECEIVED
NOV ZOO1
CITY OF TEMECULA
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT~.
John Scudder
43560Nantes Cou~
Temecul~ CA. 92592
909-302-8586
RE: Red Curb between 43560 and 43570 Nantes Court
Dear Ali,
The street I live on is Nantes Court, which is just behind the Abby Rinke Elementary
School. A concerned parent walking by with her children just spoke to me asking,
"Where's my parking spot? Every day I park my car at this nice spot and pick up my
kids?". I explained that a neighbor requested it painted red. She is referring to that curb
between 43560 and 43570 Nantes Court; a curb which was just painted red today.
I know how this parent is feeling because 1 live at 43560 Nantes Court and was just as
surprised and concerned to wake up this morning to find that area between 43560 and
43570 painted red. This well-utilized parking location is used by parents, and by me.
Why was the curb painted red?
IfI am correct, my neighbor has led the city traf¥1c engineers to believe it is too short a
location for cars; and that such cars stick over and cause some sort of impeded pathway
to their residence. The truth however, is that this particular parking area has been a civil
dispute between myself(43560) and Jack & Joyce Snell (43570) for quite some time.
Mr. Snell has made the following statements:
1. It's my property and I don't want your Jeep there.
2. Move it or I will call the police.
3. At least move it up so it's not on my property (not caring about curb length).
4. I'll do whatever it takes to prevent you from using it.
5. We don't want your ugly old Jeep there (in writing).
And Mr. Snell has done just that. He has called the police three times, and they have
responded each time telling me that the Jeep is in perfect legal rights to park there on that
public access road. They also informed me that they are not going to come out any
further on that issue or any other complaint of Mr. Snell since it's all a civil dispute. On
one particular parking complaint, the police knocked on our door at 10:30 PM when I
was at work and scared my wife, daughter and baby stating Mr. Snell complained about
my Jeep parked between 43560 and 43570. The police said that although the Jeep is
legally parked, it was missing a front license plate. That plate issue was taken care of
promptly the next morning with a trip to the DMV. However, I did contact the Sergeaht
Zunker (909-696-3000) who dealt with the complaint call of Mr. Shell's. He informed
me that Mr. Snell had complained that my Jeep was blocking his driveway. The Sergeant
personally investigated the complaint and found that the Jeep fit that parking location
perfectly. He also informed me that another complaint came that same night from Mr.
Snell and they reluctantly investigated it; and so, my wife and children were addressed.
He stated they investigate all complaints, but was going to flag his (Mr. Snell) residence
as a civil dispute matter and not to come out on his petty calls.
Mr. Snell has a history of other multiple complaint issues of which mention would extend
past the focus of this particular and directed "red curb" concern.
Although Mr. Snell benefits personally by having the curb painted between 43560 and
43570 Nantes Court, the residents and parents do not. That curb is in front of my home
(offto the side), and I enjoy its appropriate use.
I thus respectfully request that the curb between 43560 and 43570 Nantes Court be
returned to a usable space. If some soft of petition is necessary, I can obtain a great deal
of signatures by simply standing in fi.om of my home when parents drop offtheir kids
and make them aware of this means to rectify this unjust situation. There were many
parents surprised and angry at the newly painted "red curb" site.
The RED CURB also creates a potential hazardous situation and becomes a safety issue.
Mr. Snell's relative was over the same day the curb was painted red. That relative parked
half in Mr. Snell's driveway and half out in the street. This caused the vehicle to stick
out into the street at a corner during busy school activity as well as being illegally parked
(in front of the corner's red curb). If that site between 43560 and 43570 were available as
it had been prior, his relative could have utilized the parking space instead of creating an
unsafe and illegal parking situation. There is no benefit to the community; neither in
traffic regulation nor in safety regulation to have the curb between 43560 and 43570
painted red. It benefits only one man, Mr. Jack Snell.
In three days, I'll follow up this letter with pictures describing:
1. How Nantes Court needs all available parking areas for parents and residents.
2. How a full sized Honda Accord safely fits parked between 43560 and 43570
3. How my Jeep fits within the confines of that parking space with plenty of room.
4. How that on trash day all parking areas are affected. No one gets a red curb just
to allow for their trashcan placement. However, it is important to note that I
purposefully move my Jeep every Monday night if it is parked at that location to
allow Mr. Snell ample space to put his trashcans for Tuesday trash pickup.
5. How cars parking in other locations hang over driveways. One would have to
paint all the curbs on the entire block RED to prevent such activity.
6. How Mr. Snell's relative parked (today) in an illegal and unsafe manner on a
corner in front of a school; not having use of the 43560 and 43570 curb.
I do not believe that the size of any car parked between 43560 and 43570 has ever been
an issue with Mr. Snell. He even parks his own cars there. In the initial mgnths after
moving to 43570, Mr. Snell took all three of his vehicles out of his garage and parked
them on the street (including that space between 43560 and 43570), stating, "I don't want
those parents parking on our street". Another neighbor also commented as to how a man
would buy a house across from the school and not expect parents to park their cars there.
Mr. Snell has consistently told us "we don't want you parking there" [between 43560 and
43570 Nantes Court]. The entire request for the RED CURB has been a civil matter to
appease and benefit one individual (Mr. Snell) while adversely affecting a large body of
residents.
The space between 43560 and 43570 is a public parking area that has been taken
away from the immediate community. It is needed, and it is respectfully requested
that it be returned.
I am a Registered Nurse working in ER and ICU Critical Care areas and I am usually
very busy (working nights); yet I will take the time to appear in person if such is
necessary. I do this for myself and for my community; parents with children; neighbors
who use this parking area; and to prevent unsafe parking conditions on a corner across
from a busy school. This issue is that important to me. Since cars fit there; since it is
often used; since its absence creates possible safety issues; and since there is a great need
for any available parking on Nantes court with respect to its proximity to the school; I
feel this is a very appropriate request. This is especially true since the benefit a red curb
has does not create a better traffic condition, but rather, appeases the control issues of one
individual: Mr. Snell at 43570 Nantes Court.
I do not believe Mr. Ali Moghadan would have allowed this curb to be painted red had he
been properly informed of the real issues surrounding that curb site. Your department is
doing all it can to make our roads safe, and I commend you for your time and service. I
appreciate all your efforts, and look forward to hearing back from you regarding this
particular and perhaps isolated incident where a much needed parking area has been
removed from the community to benefit one individual's control issue.
Sincerely,
Jo~and Kara Scudder
43560 Nantes Court
Temecula, CA. 92592
909-302-8586
EXHIBIT "C"
SITE PLAN
ITEM NO. 3
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
AGENDA REPORT
Public/Traffic Safety Commission
(~Ali Moghadam, P.E., Senior Engineer, Traffic
December 13, 2001
Item 3
Turn Restrictions - Rancho Vista Road at Temecula Valley High School
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission receive the staffreport and provide further direction to staff.
BACKGROUND:
A request was received from Public/Traffic Safety Commissioner Connerton to review the feasibility of
implementing turn restrictions on Rancho Vista Road at Temecula Valley High School and to place the item on
the agenda for review and discussion. Specifically, the restrictions would eliminate left-tums "out" of the
campus and restrict "U" tums at the entrance to the district offices. The public has been notified of the
Public/Traffic Safety Commission's consideration of this matter through the agenda notification process.
Rancho Vista Road is classified as a 64 foot wide four (4) lane Secondary Highway on the City's General Plan
Circulation Plan. Currently, in front of the high school Rancho Vista Road is striped for two travel lanes in
each direction, separate left-tom lanes and a bike lane on each side of the roadway. Rancho Vista Road cames
an Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume of 5,736 at this location. Them are approximately five (5) driveways
that provide access to and from Temecula Valley High School. The first set of driveways, located just east of
Margarita Road, provides ingress and egress into the visitors/teachers parking lot and serves as a student-
loading zone. The second set of driveways, located opposite of Calle Rio Vista and Avenida De La Reina,
provides ingress and egress into the student parking lot. The fifth driveway, located at the east end of the
school property, provides access for the school buses. Both left-tom and fight-tom movements are allowed at
all of the egress driveways.
An evaluation of traffic conditions was performed which included a review of the existing striping, traffic
controls, traffic circulation and accident history. A review of the accident history for the period from
September 1, 1999 through September 30, 2001, indicates that there were approximately seven (7) reported
collisions on Rancho Vista Road between Margarita Road and Via E1 Greco. Of these, only two (2) collisions
occurred in the area of the Temecula Valley High School during school hours. This would indicate that the
majority of motofists are exercising due care when traveling on Rancho Vista Road in the vicinity of the high
school.
A review of traffic circulation indicates that if vehicles are restricted to "right-tom out only" at the exit
driveways, then it is likely that the intersections of Calle Rio Vista and Avenida De La Reina, where left-tom
movements are allowed, will experience additional congestion. Moreover, the inconvenience to the parents
caused by not being able to turn left "out from the high school, may encourage the use of residential streets
north of the high school as a loading zone thereby creating an increase in vehicular traffic.
A "U" turn restriction at the entrance to the district office along with the "right-tom only" restriction will result
in "U' tums to occur at Via El Greco where Rancho Vista Road is a narrow two lane roadway without a left-
tom pocket. Again, this intersection would experience additional congestion and it is likely that there would be
an increase in traffic collisions due to vehicles turning left or making a "U" turn. Since Via El Green provides
a circuitous route to Rancho California Road it is likely that this neighborhood would experience an increase in
"cut-through" traffic. Currently, the conflicting movements observed by Commissioner Connerton are
confined to the area within the school zone, which is posted at 25 MPH. Implementation of the restrictions
would move the conflicting movements to an area outside of the school zone with a higher posted speed limit.
Since currently there are no other viable westbound travel altematives after exiting the high school, staff is not
recommending the implementation of restricted turning movements at the high school driveways or on Rancho
Vista Road.
In the past, staff has met with representatives from the Temecula Valley Unified School District to discuss
access issues related to the high school. An alternative that has been discussed would provide a signalized
access at the intersection of Avenida De La Reina. This alternative would require the district to reconfigure the
on-site circulation to accommodate a full access driveway at this location for both the current student parking
lot and the visitor/teachers parking lot and student-loading zone. To date, the City has not received a response
from the district. It is our opinion that this alternative would alleviate some of Commissioner Connerton's
concerns. Therefore, staff recommends that the Public/Traffic Safety Commission continue to pursue the
implementation of this alternative, which will require school district participation, through the commission's
liaison to the school district.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Attachment:
1. Exhibit "A" - Location Map
2. Exhibit "B" - Traffic Collision History Report
3. Exhibit "C" - Site Plan
2
EXHIBIT "A"
LOCATION MAP
EXHIBIT "B"
TRAFFIC COLLISION HISTORY REPORT
r-, z w z ~ w ~ w
EXHIBIT "C"
SITE PLAN
ITEM NO. 4
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
AGENDA REPORT
Public/Traffic Safety Commission
,~.~. Ali Moghadam, P.E., Senior Eng/neer, Traffic
December 13, 2001
Item 4
Request for Traffic Control Modifications - Butterfield Stage Road
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission:
1. Deny the request to install Multi-Way Stop Signs at the intersection of Butterfield Stage Road and
Jerez Lane; and
2. Recommend to the City Council the installation of Multi-Way Stop Signs at the intersection of
Butterfield Stage Road and De Portola Road; and
3. Deny the request to lower the existing speed limit from 55 MPH and 50 MPH to 45 MPH on
Butterfield Stage Road; and
4. Deny the request to establish a two-ton weight limit restriction on Butterfield Stage Road.
BACKGROUND:
Staffreceived a letter from Citizens Against Neighborhood Expressways (CANE) requesting the installation of
Multi-Way Stop Controls at the intersections of Butterfield Stage Road with Jerez Lane and De Portola Road,
reduction of the current 55 and 50 mile per hour speed limits to 45 miles per hour and establishment of a 2-ton
weight limit on Butterfield Stage Road. Staffhas also received several separate requests for installation of
multi-way stop signs at the Butterfield Stage Road and De Portola Road intersection. The public has been
notified of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission's consideration of this issue through the agenda notification
process.
Butterfield Stage Road is classified on the City's General Plan Circulation Element as an 86 foot wide Arterial
Highway with restricted access. An Arterial Highway provides for four (4) travel lanes and a 14 foot wide
raised median. Butterfield Stage Road carries an approximate volume of 5,200 Average Daily Traffic (ADT)
south of Pauba Road, 3,900 ADT north of De Portola Road and 4,800 ADT south of De Portola Road. The
speed limit is posted at 55 MPH between Pauba Road and De Portola Road and 50 MPH between De Portola
Road and State Route 79 (South).
Butterfield Sta~,e Road at Jerez Lane
In 1988, the Riverside County Board of Supervisors first approved Vesting Tentative Tract Map 23143
creating the Crowne Hill subdivision. The map identified two (2) points of access to the subdivision along
Butterfield Stage Road at Crowne Hill Drive and Royal Crest Place. On Pauba Road one access point was
r:\traffic\commissn\agenda\2001\1213\Butterfield Stage Road/ajp
identified at Crowne Hill Drive. The developer was conditioned to provide ~raffic signals at all the locations as
well as at the intersection of Butterfield Stage Road and Pauba Road.
In July 1999, the City approved Tract Map 23143-3 in the Crowne Hill subdivision. The developer was
conditioned by the Fire Department to provide a secondary emergency access to the subdivision. In order to
meet the requirement, a temporary access driveway was provided to Fox Drive from Butterfield Stage Road at
the Jerez Lane intersection. Ultimately, when the subdivision's street system is developed and a secondary
access is provided that fulfills the Fire Department's requirements, the existing temporary access driveway at
Jerez Lane will be removed and the area will become a storm water retention basin for the subdivision. In
addition to the closure of the temporary access driveway Butterfield Stage Road will ultimately have a raised
median at this location limiting access to "right-in/right-out" only at Jerez Lane. Since a controlled
intersection is proposed south of this location at Crown ltill Drive, and this location is a temporary
intersection, staff is not recommending the installation of multi-way stop signs or crosswalks at
Butterfield Stage Road and Jerez Lane.
Butterfield Staee Road at De Portola Road
An evaluation of traffic conditions was performed at the intersection of Butterfield Stage Road and De Portola
Road to determine if the minimum warrant criteria for the installation of Multi-Way Stop Signs are satisfied.
The evaluation includes a review of 24-hour vehicular volume data and accident history at the intersection.
The Caltrans Traffic Manual indicates that the Multi-Way Stop installation may be useful at locations where
the volumes of traffic on intersecting roads are approximately equal and/or where a combination of high speed,
restricted sight distance and an accident history indicates that assignment of right-of-way is necessary. There
are three (3) criteria that Caltrans has established for the evaluation of Multi-Way Stop signs. These criteria
are as follows:
Where signals are warranted and urgently needed, the multi-way stop may be an interim measure that
can be installed quickly to control traffic while arrangements are being made for the signal
installations.
An accident problem, as indicated by five (5) or more reported accidents within a twelve (12) month
period of a type susceptible to correction by a multi-way stop installation. Such accidents include
right and left-turn collisions as well as right-angle collisions.
3. Minimum Traffic Volumes
The total vehicular volume entering the intersection from all approaches must average at least
500 vehicles per hour for any eight (8) hours of an average day, and
The combined vehicular and pedestrian volume from the minor street or highway must
average at least 200 units per hour for the same eight (8) hours, with an average delay to
minor street vehicular traffic of at least 30 seconds per vehicle during the maximum hour,
but
When the 85-percentile approach speed of the major street traffic exceeds 40 miles per hour,
the minimum vehicular volume warrant is 70 percent of the above requirements.
2
The Multi-Way Stop warrant analysis performed indicates that although the vehicular volume warrant criteria
is only 70% satisfied, Multi-Way Stop signs are justified due to the 55 MPH speed limit along Butterfield
Stage Road and the visibility restrictions at the intersection. Therefore, staff is recommending the
installation of Multi-Way Stop signs at Bntterfleld Stage Road and De Portola Road.
Sveed Limit Reduction on Butterfield Staffe Road
In 2000, a Citywide Engineering and Traffic Survey was performed to reaffmn and establish Prima Facie speed
limits on city streets. Butterfield Stage Road between Pauba Road and State Route 79 (South) was included in
the survey. In July 2000, the City Council adopted an ordinance establishing the posted speed limit on
Butter field Stage Road between Pauba Road and De Portola Road at 55 MPH and between De Portola Road
and State Route 79 (South) at 50 MPH. Although it is within the City's authority to set a posted speed limit
below the findings of the Engineering and Traffic Survey, the speed limit posted must be reasonable, prudent
and more importantly, enforceable. The Engineering and Traffic Survey performed indicates that the 85th
percentile speed on Butterfield Stage Road between Pauba Road and De Portola Road is 62 MPH and between
De Portola Road and State Route 79 (South) the 85t~ percentile speed is 52 MPH. In this case, the posted
speed limit of 55 MPH and 50 MPH, respectively, are considered to be enforceable and appropriate for
conditions on Butterfield Stage Road. Therefore, based on the requirements of the California Vehicle
Code, staff is not recommending lower speed limits on Butterfield Stage Road.
Establishment of Weieht Limit Restriction on Butterfield Sta~e Road
As previously mentioned Butterfield Stage Road between Murrieta Hot Springs Road and State Route 79
(South) is classified as an Arterial Highway with restricted access on the City's General Plan Circulation
Element. In the County, north of Murrieta Hot Springs Road, Butterfield Stage Road is also classified as an
Arterial Highway with restricted access. Butterfield Stage Road south of State Route 79 (South) is classified as
a Major Highway, which tums into a Secondary Highway south of Nighthawk Pass in the Vail Ranch area.
Because Butterfield Stage Road appears on both the City and County's Circulation Element, it is considered an
integral part of a countywide roadway system and provides regional access to numerous commercial and
residential developments. Moreover, the roadway has been designed to carry multiple modes of transportation
including trucks, buses and service vehicles. However, it is not likely that Butterfield Stage Road will carry the
same percentage of truck traffic that Interstate 15 or Winchester Road are expected to cany because of the lack
of direct access to Interstate l 5.
It is also important to recognize that Butterfield Stage Road is only one of the four, north/south arterial streets
that provide regional access to the City. Ynez Road, Margarita Road, Meadows Parkway and Butterfield Stage
Road all share the common characteristic of having large developments with residential units "hacking" onto
the roadway. Any type of commercial vehicle restriction on any portion of these streets will only divert the
truck traffic onto the unrestricted north/south arterials. For example, a restriction on Butterfield Stage Road
will likely divert truck traffic onto adjacent Meadows Parkway. Because Meadows Parkway also has
residential units that "back" onto the roadway, it is likely that shortly after implementation of the restriction on
Butterfield Stage Road, those residents would be requesting a similar restriction on Meadows Parkway. It is
staff s opinion that the current unrestricted access to all four roadways provides multiple navel routes for track
traffic and uniformly distributes the truck traffic on all north/south routes as well as the east/west connecting
routes.
The Califomia Vehicle Code (CVC) defines the criteria to be used in establishIng weight reslhctions on streets
within the jurisdiction of the local authorities. The CVC also authorizes any city or county to prohibit, by
ordinance, the use of a street by any commercial vehicle or by any vehicle exceeding a maximum gross weight
limit within a residence district. Since the area along Butterfield Stage Road does not fit the definition of a
residence district as defined in CVC Section 515, the City does not have the authority to prohibit commercial
3
vehicular traffic exceeding a maximum gross weight limit on Butterfield Stage Road. Moreover, the CVC
requires that on roadways, such as Butterfield Stage Road, which connect with or is a continuation of a
roadway of an adjoining jurisdiction, that jurisdiction must approve a similar ordinance prohibiting commercial
vehicular traffic on their portion of the roadway.
The adoption of any weight restriction does not guarantee the elimination of truck traffic on the restricted
route. The CVC authorizes tracks to use a restricted route when coming from an unrestricted roadway
having ingress and egress by direct route to and from the restricted roadway when necessary for the
purpose of making pickups or deliveries of goods, services or merchandise fi.om or to any building or structure
located on the restricted roadway or for the purpose of delivering materials to be used in the actual bona fide
repair, alteration, remodeling or construction of any building or structure upon the restricted roadway.
For these reasons, staff is not recommending the establishment of a weight restriction on Butterfield
Stage Road.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Funds are available for signing and pavement markings in the Public Works Routine Street Maintenance
Account.
Attachment:
1. Exhibit "A" - Location Map
2. Exhibit "B" - Letter from Citizens Against Neighborhood Expressways (CANE)
3. Exhibit "C"- Crowne Hill Subdivision Site Plan
4. Exhibit "D" - Multi-Way Stop Warrant Analysis
4
EXHIBIT "A"
LOCATION MAP
EXHIBIT "B"
LETTER FROM CITIZENS AGAINST
NEIGHBORHOOD EXPRESSWAYS (CANE)
Untitled Document Page 1 of 3
of life
For more information
visit the following
links:
Main
Click here to see
Proposed Routes
Map
Send us Feedback
ALERTS!!!
Michelle Anderson testified in support of a resolution being considered
by the Temecula City Council on October 23. 2001. The resolution
formally opposed converting Butterfield StageRoad into an expressway
or freeway.
Staff stated that the resolution would clarify the City's formal
opposition to a freeway OR an EXPRESSWAY on Butterfield Stage
Road, and the council passed it unanimously. Mrs. Anderson asked the
council to do more than just put their opposition down on paper. She
asked that they take the following actions to help keep Butterfield
Stage as a neighborhood friendly ROAD and not an expressway:
I. Post a 4-way stop sign at Jerez and Butterfield along
with crosswalks and a "school crossing" sign.., steps
needed to protect children and their parents as they
attempt to get across 4 lanes of traffic without getting hit
by a car.
2. Add a 4-way stop sign at DePortola and Butterfield.
This is to make it more consistent with Meadows Parkway
(also a 4-way stop) and Margarita (a traffic lighO. We
want cars to slow down at the bottom of the hill, not speed
up as they head out to Hwy 79 S.
3. Set the speed limit for a road not an expressway (45
mph, not 65 mph) and post signs. Have the police out to
patrol and ticket speeders.
4. Limit tonnage of trucks using Butterfield Stage Rd. (2
ton limit). We don't want Butterfield Stage Rd. to be the
preferred route for freight trucks bringing goods to the
http://www.aboutcane.org/aboutcanealerts.htm 11/19/2001
Untitled Document Page 2 of 3
HyperWalmart or Pechanga Gambling Casino and Hotel.
Trucks are excessively noisy, they pollute and they can not
stop quickly enough.
Immediately after the resolution passed unanimously, a councilman
asked Mrs. Anderson if she would provide the council staff with a copy
of her recommendations so they could be reviewed and considered by
the council.
Citizens can send an email to the Temecula City Council requesting
these actions be put into place as soon as possible. Those who wish to
make any suggestions of their own regarding how to keep Butterfield
Stage Rd. a neighborhood friendly ROAD and not an expressway can
send an email: to the City Council by clicking here. Or, click on the
"Send Us Feedback" button on the left side of the Home page.
Conunent: Without the City's formal opposition, the 5/1 and 5B
corridors were sitting ducks for expansion into expressways by county
and state transportation planners. We are seeing the positive results of
concerns that neighbors expressed so eloquently. The results reflect
well on the involved citizens who gathered together and shared their
concerns and on the governmental agencies that listened thoughtfully
to the testimony presented.
Check back for more...
Archive News Below...(old stuff)
Five CANE members attended the RCTC (Riverside Co.
Transportation Commission) meeting this morning to present our
objections to Alternate 5 (the Butterfield Stage Rd. proposal) remaining
on the study for a new corridor system to move traffic north and south
through Riverside County. Although a motion was made to eliminate
Alternate 5 from the study, voiced opposition from Co. Supervisor Bob
Buster forced an amended motion to be made. That motion moved to
have Alternate 5 off of the "preferred list," but it still remains as part of
the EIR (Environmental Impact Report) study process.
According to Cathy Bechtel, coordinator for the transportation corridor
process, the next step is to study the four alternatives (1,3, 5 and 7) and
find the one that is "least environmentally impacting." CANE is
concerned about this next step. Some arguments have already been
presented by residents living along the other alternate routes that they
would have more environmental impact than the Butterfield Stage
corridor would. That is why CANE wants to intensify its efforts in
fighting to get 5 out of the study. We feel it is imperative that citizens
attend Tuesday night's City Council meeting to voice their concerns
and ask the City to unconditionally support our opposition to
Alternative 5. Keep checking back with our website to find ottt our
http ://www.aboutcane.org/aboutcanealerts.htm 11/19/2001
Untitled Document Page 3 of 3
upcoming plan of action .....
News Alert C.A.N.E. Presents Organized Opposition to the
Proposed Butterfield Freeway Route
A group of representatives from C.A.N.E. traveled to Riverside on
Tuesday Sept 4th to attend the CETAP Advisory Meeting. (CETAP
is the group that makes recommendations as to which routes for the
Transportation Corridors should be moved forward in the process). Our
CANE group was there opposing Routes 5a and 5b (and also 6a and 6b,
which were already removed from the study). These routes are the ones
that incorporate Butterfield Rd. as a major component in the
"transportation corridor." Ron Roberts, Temecula City Councilman
went on record saying that the documents handed out by the County at
the Seeping Meeting on Aug 27th were very misleading. He referenced
a map on page 4 that showed Butterfield Stage Rd as a freeway with 5
potential interchanges on it. This certainly conflicted with the
information that the City gave to the residents last Friday, when they
were told that Butterfield Stage Rd. would be an "medal expressway"
only. Cathy Bechtel, the coordinator for the study of the Proposed
Transporation corridors, then gave some clarification to the whole
process. She said that at this point in the process they are only at a "tier
1 environmental document." In this phase, they do not get into the
specifics of what the road is going to look like. In other words, it
could be a 4 lane medium speed road, or a 6 lane
superhighway with HOV lanes. What this corridor will be is NOT
decided at the Tier 1 process. She went on to further state that she is
bound by regulations to study "the ultimate on all of the alternatives.
We have to compare apples to apples." In other words, the
ultimate on Butterfield Stage Rd. would be a freeway. That
doesn't mean that if selected that is automatically what will happen.
What it means is that it would move to "Tier 2 document" where the
type of corridor (freeway, expressway, HOV lanes, etc.) would be
defined. CANE's position is that we don't want to wait until the tier 2
document to fight our battle. We want Alternative 5 off of the selection
process NOW. Eight members of our group spoke eloquently and
passionately on behalf of removing Route 5a and 5b from the study.
Our comments were put into public record. Stay tuned for
updates .....
Site provided ccmrte~T of $itesm~th$.com web designers
http://www.aboutcane.org/aboutcanealerts.htm 11/19/2001
EXHIBIT "C"
CROWNE HILL SUBDIVISION
SITE PLAN
TRACT 24185
ACCESS ROAD
Hill
EXHIBIT "D"
MULTI-WAY STOP WARRANT ANALYSIS
Multi-Way Stop Warranting Software
10/23/01
Major Street:
Minor Street:
Date of Analysis:
Name of Analyst:
Case Number:
Comments:
85th% Speed of Major Street: 55
BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD
DE PORTOLA ROAD
10/23/01
WARRANT ANALYSIS SUMMARY:
WARRANT 1 - Accident Experience
NOT SATISFIED - The accident warrant of 5 or more reportable accidents
of a correctable type is not met with 1 accidents over a 12 month period.
WARRANT 2 - Minimum Traffic Volumes
NOT SATISFIED - The 100% vehicular warrant of 500 entering vehicles for
any 8 hours of the day is not met with 1 hours meeting the warrant.
SATISFIED - The 70% vehicular warrant of 350 entering vehicles for
any 8 hours of the day is met with 8 hours meeting the warrant.
WARRANT 3 - Vehicular & Pedestrian Traffic from Minor Road
NOT SATISFIED - The combined total of 200 vehicles and pedestrians
from the minor approach is not met with 0 hours meeting the warrant.
Multi-Way Stop Warranting Software
10/23/01
START
TIME
NB SB EB
100% 70%
WB HOUR WARRAiqT WARRANT
TOT MET MET
COMBINATION
WARRANT
MET
0:00 19 12 5 5 41
1:00 8 6 4 1 19
2:00 8 6 4 1 19
3:00 5 6 1 3 15
4:00 7 14 11 2 34
5:00 29 42 14 8 93
6:00 75 97 34 42 248
7:00 111 135 47 66 359
8:00 95 100 32 48 275
9:00 93 83 43 42 261
10:00 113 94 41 47 295
11:00 108 106 48 45 307
12:00 111 90 50 43 294
13:00 114 76 61 54 305
14:00 106 93 54 40 293
15:00 127 97 44 49 317
16:00 158 125 69 39 391
17:00 231 178 68 58 535
18:00 191 134 53 48 426
19:00 140 119 61 42 362
20:00 152 88 40 27 307
21:00 69 53 22 28 172
22:00 44 22 13 9 88
23:00 21 19 2 4 46
ITEM NO. 5
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Public/Traffic Safety Commission
~Ali Moghadam, P.E., Senior Engineer, Traffic
December 13, 2001
Item 5
Roadway Striping and Sight Distance - Jefferson Avenue at Primecare
Building Driveway
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission receive and file the staff report.
BACKGROUND:
At the meeting of October 25, 2001, staff received a request from Public/Traffic Safety Commissioner
Connerton to review the visibility at the Primecare Building driveway located on Jefferson Avenue, and to
place the item on the agenda. The public has been notified of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission's
consideration of this matter through the agenda notification process.
Jefferson Avenue is classified as a 76 foot wide four (4) lane Major Highway on the City's Circulation Element
with two travel lanes in each direction and a raised median. Currently, Jefferson Avenue is striped with two
(2) travel lanes in each direction and a center two-way left turn lane to serve the numerous access points along
the roadway. Jefferson Avenue cames an Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume of approximately 18,649 at
this location. The Primecare Building has one primary access point that is located in the middle of the
property. The "Jiffy-Lube" driveway located north of the site provides additional access to the site.
An evaluation of the sight distance was performed for left-mm ingress and egress at the intersection. Our
evaluation indicates that the visibility of approaching southbound Jefferson Avenue traffic is limited for exiting
traffic due to the landscaping located in the parkway behind the sidewalk and the curvature of the roadway. It
was also determined that the sight distance for northbound left-turn vehicles on Jefferson Avenue is completely
unobstructed. Staffis recommending the removal of the landscaping that is causing the obstruction.
Another concern was the potential conflicts between left-turning vehicles into the Primecare building driveway
and vehicles exiting the "In/Out" driveway located approximately 100 feet to the north on the east side of
Jefferson Avenue. Because of the 100 foot offset, it is staff's opinion that the potential conflicts between left-
mm vehicles are minimal. A review of the reported accident history for the 24-month period from September
1, 1999 through September 30, 2001, indicates that them were no collisions reported at this location, which
supports this opinion. This also indicates that motorists are exercising due care when entering and exiting at
these driveways.
r:\traffick:ommissn~agenda~2001 \1213~Jefferson Avenue/ajp
Although staffagrees that during certain times of the day there may be some delays entering and exiting at this
location, the accident history does not indicate that changes to the existing striping or present level of traffic
control is needed to address safety concerns. Moreover, it is important to recognize that this condition exists
all along Jefferson Avenue from the north city limits to Rancho California Road. It is staff's opinion that the
only solution to reducing the number of turning movements at driveways along Jefferson Avenue is the
construction of a raised median island with limited access. Therefore, staffis not recommending any changes
at this location. It should be noted that installation of a raised median island on Jefferson Avenue is on the
City's five (5) year Capital Improvement Program.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
Attachment:
1. Exhibit "A" - Location Map
2. Exhibit "B"- Site Plan
2
EXHIBIT "A"
LOCATION MAP
EXHIBIT "B"
SITE PLAN
ITEM NO. 6
TRAFFIC ENGINEER'S REPORT
APPROVAL
ClTY A'I-I'ORNEY
DIRECTOR OFFINANCE
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City ManagedCity Council
William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
November 27, 2001
Department of Public Works Monthly Activity Report
RECOMMENDATION: Attached for City Council's review and filing is the Department of Public
Works' Monthly Activity Reports for the month of October, 2001.
MOACTRPT
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Monthly Activity Report
October / November 2001
Prepared By: Amer Attar
Submitted by: William G. Hughes
Date: November 27, 2001
PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION
1. First Street Bridge
This project will construct First Street from Pujol Street to Old Town Front Street, including the construction
of a bridge over Murrieta Creek and the realignment of Santiago Road. Contractor has finished the final punch
list items on the street portion of the work. Construction of the EMWD lit~ station is complete with only punch
list items to remain. Contractor and EMWD are working out the final CCO amount.
2. Murrieta Creek Crossing Between Winchester and Rancho California Road- Low-flow Crossing at
Via Montezuma
This project will construct a low-flow crossing of Murrieta Creek connecting Diaz and Del Rio at Via
Montezuma. In addition, this project will rehabilitate the street of Via Montezuma. This project is complete.
Recording a conservation easement is in progress for the mitigation of the disturbed area. Draft Document was
sent to the ACOE, Fish & Game and RWQCB for review on 10/3 I/01.
3. City Maintenance Facility Alterations, Phase HI
This project will modify the existing two story masonry block building to accommodate a new second floor of
office space over the existing two-story maintenance bay, including the installation o£an elevator, and two new
second floor restrooms. Building modifications are nearly complete with the first phase of staff scheduled to
occupy the building the week of November 26th. Elevator parts are on back order with the subcontractor
scheduled to complete the work by the second week of December. Project is currently scheduled to be
complete by mid December.
4. Margarita Road Widening, Pauba Road to Dartolo Road
This project will widen Margarita Road from Pio Pico to Dartolo Road and re-landscape the medians from De
Portola to SR 79 South. Included with this project is the pavement rehabilitation of Phase II (Pauba Road to
Pin Pico. The contractor has completed the street work, with some minor punch list items still remaining. The
project is in the 65-Working Days Maintenance period, which began on October 8, 2001.
5. Traffic Signal installation at Stonewood and Margarita
A traffic signal will be installed at the intersection of Margarita Road and Stonewood Drive. This project is
complete. City Council is expected to accept the project at the Nov. 27, 2001 meeting.
6. Pavement Management System, Jefferson Avenue
This proj oct will rehabilitate Jefferson Avenue from the northerly City limits to Overland Drive. The contractor
R:~vlonthlyActivityRepon\CIPX2001 \October.doc
has completed the work for this project. It is scheduled for City Council acceptance on Nov. 27, 2001.
7. Senior Center Expansion
The expansion will include an addition of 3000 square feet to the existing building. The expansion will be for
recreational, office, and meeting purposes. A contract was awarded to R. Moody Construction on June 26 in
thc amount of $508,500. Expansion will include thc addition of 3000 square feet of building area for
recreational, office and meeting purposes. Wood framing is complete. HVAC ductwork and insulation
installation arc underway to bc followed by installation of interior drywall and exterior roofing, wood siding
and brick veneer. Scheduled completion is set for early January 2002.
8. Pavement Management System- Citywide
This project will involve rehabilitating the pavement of various streets in thc City for FY 2000-01.
McLaughlin Engineering and Mining Corp. was awarded a contract at thc June 26 Council meeting in thc
amount of $2,073,000. Thc roads scheduled for construction are Rancho California Road, Mira Loma Drive,
La Paz Road, Winchester Road (Between Diaz and Enterprise Circle West), Southbound Yncz Road (Between
Winchester and Overland), Main Street, Enterprise Circle West (South of Winchester), and Overland Drive
(Between Margarita and Yncz). The Contractor has completed all of thc work for this project and thc final
invoice has bean submitted for payment.
9. AC Street Repairs- FY2001
This project will rehabilitate and reconstruct selected City streets. Cunningham Davis was awarded the
contract at the June 26 Council meeting in the amount orS 117,000. The roads scheduled for construction arc
Margarita Road at Avenida Cima Del Sol, Jefferson Avenue at Del Rio, Overland Drive at Commerce Center,
Enterprise Circle West at Rider Way, and Diaz Road at Rancho Way. The Contractor bas completed most of
the work for this project. Minor striping and punch list items are all that remain.
10. Chaparral High School Swimming Pool
A 25-yard x 25-meter pool will be built at Chaparral High School. The facility will include a smaller
recreation pool component and a bathhouse with locker room facilities, restrooms and showers. Spray-type
play equipment will be included as an element in the base construction bid. The slabs for the two buildings
have been poured and the block work for the walls will began on Monday, November 19. The tile work on the
pools has begun, and much of the underground work is nearing completion.
11. Starlight Ridge Southern Cross Road Sidewalk Project
This Project will install approximately one half mile of sidewalk along the northwest side of Southern Cross
Road. This project is complete. Notice of Completion is going to the City Council on 12/11/01.
12. Emergency Generator - City Hall & City Yard
This project will install an emergency generator for City Hall. Contractor is ready to install Generator. City
waiting to present enclosure plans to Business Park Association. Upon BPA approval Construction will begin.
13. Long Canyon Detention Basin 5-yr Habitat Maintenance
Under this project, the Long Canyon Detention Basin will be planted and maintained for five years. Contractor
began grading. Irrigation system and planting should be complete by the end of thc year.
14. 1-15 Northbound On-Ramp Widening at Winchester Road
This project will re-stripe westbound Winchester Road from Ynez Road to I-15 northbound on-ramp to allow
for a better flow of traffic. Bids were opened on 11/15/01. The lowest bidder is DBX, inc. with a bid of
$32,390. Award of contract is scheduled for 11/27/01.
PROJECTS BEING ADVERTISED FOR BIDS
NONE
PROJECTS IN DESIGN
1. Pala Road Improvements - Phase II (79 South to Pechanga Road)
This project will widen Pala Road to its ultimate width from the Pala Road Bridge to Pechanga road. Plan
check comments (70% Submittal) were returned to the consultant. Work is proceeding on the remainder of the
design. The approval of Wolf Creek Drainage Basin Study by RCFC & WCD has been delayed because
hydrology studies upstream of Wolf Creek require prior approval from RCFC & WCD. Staffwill be using an
appraiser to assist in the preparation of the real estate appraisal report. The project is funded for design only at
this time.
2. Rancho California Road Bridge Widening Over Murrieta Creek
This project will widen Rancho California Bridge over Murrieta Creek to provide four additional traffic lanes.
Consultant is investigating potential lateral spreading and scour and ways to mitigate these impacts. 90%
drawings will be submitted shortly after the analysis is complete.
3. Temecula Library
A full service library, approximately 34,000 square feet in area, will be designed and built on Pauba Road, just
west of Fire Station #84. This project will provide the community with library resoumes and services. The
design is progressing on schedule. Utility services constxuction is being coordinated with Pauba Road, Phase Il
project. Staff returned checked plans to architect on 8/28/01. Architect is working on the final plans. A final
review between the City and the architect was held on 10/16/01. Utility services construction will be
coordinated with Pauba Road, Phase II Street Improvements.
4. Pauba Road Improvements - Phase II (Margarita Road to Showalter Road)
This project will widen Pauba Road from Showalter to just west of Margarita Road to its ultimate width. The
project is in design and the work is being coordinated with design of the library project. All utility issues are
being addressed. 90% design plans were submitted to the City for review. Plans and specs were reviewed by
staff and were returned to Consultant for completion of final design plans. Final plans is to be submitted to the
City during the next period
3 R:hMon thlyAc tivityRe'por t\C 1P~2001 \October.doc
5. Murrieta Creek Bridge - Overland Drive Extension to Diaz
This project will entail alignment studies and the design of an extension of Overland Drive, westerly to Diaz
Road, which includes a new bridge over Murricta Creek. The project includes the widening of Overland Drive
from Jefferson Avenue to Commerce Center Drive, and the extension of Overland Drive across Mumeta Creek
to Diaz Road. PDC has completed the alignment study and staffhas reviewed copies of the preliminary plans.
Staff sent comments to the consultant regarding the negative declaration to revise the environmental
documents.
6. New Temecula Sports Complex
A new 40+ Acres sports complex will be built on Pala Road at Wolf Valley. A soils report was completed and
forwarded to the City. The soils report indicated substantial and costlyremovals. Staffis evaluating options on
preparing the site or choosing a different site. The consultant, RIM Design is finishing up the preliminary
master plan of the sports complex.
7. Fire Station - Wolf Creek Site
A full service fire station will be constructed in the Wolf Creek development area. The architect is to complete
preliminary design for DRC in the next 2-3 weeks. Site is to be finalized with and coordinated by Wolf Creek
Developer.
8. Diaz Road Realignment
Under this project, Diaz Road will be realigned to Vincent Moraga Road at Rancho Califomia Road. Business
Park Drive will be a T-intersection at Diaz. City staffis currently designing the project. Anticipated design
completion is scheduled for January 2002.
9. Rancho California Road Median Modifications at Town Center
The project will include the closing of the two median openings on Rancho California Road in front of the
Town Center, while lengthening the left mm lanes at Ynez Road, Town Center Drive, and Via Los Colinas to
improve traffic circulation. The design is 90% complete with the exception of the landscaping. Landscaping
design is currently at 50% completion.
10. Rancho California Road Widening at Ynez Road (Add right turn lane to westbound lanes)
This project will add a right turn lane on westbound Rancho California Road at Ynez Road. Right of way
acquisition at the northeast comer of Rancho California and Ynez will be required. In-house design is 90%
complete.
11. Landscaping and Sidewalk On 79 South (Front Street to Pala Road)
The project consists of the design and construction of new sidewalk, landscaping, and irrigation along the
south side of State Highway 79 South between Pala Road and Old Town Front Street. A design consultant has
been selected and an agenda report to approve the design agreement is scheduled for the November 27, 2001
Council meeting.
12. Alignment Study for Murrieta Creek Bridge Between Winchester Road and Temecula's City Limits
and Diaz Road Extension
This study will determine the alignment and location of the Murcieta Creek crossing between Winchester Road
4 R:hMonthlyActivityReport\ClP~2001 \October.doc
to the northern City Limits. In addition, the study will be combined with the Diaz Road Extension alignment
study and design. Coordination with the City of Murrieta, Flood Control and Army Corps of Engineers is
necessary. The Consultant and Staff met with Riverside County Flood Control to discuss possible alignments.
The consultant is currently working on the first draft of the alignment study.
13. Traffic Signals Modifications at Pala Road and Loma Linda, and at Pala Road and Wolf Valley
Two traffic signals will be modified to accommodate the road interim widening. Wildan, the City's consultant
is updating the signal modification plans.
PROJECTS THAT ARE SUSPENDED OR ON-HOLD
1. Margarita Road/Winchester Road Intersection Improvements
Project is on hold. Under this project, an additional left turn from eastbound Winchester to northbound
Margarita will be added in order to accommodate increasing traffic volumes. Design is 50% complete. Project
will require a Caltrans encroachment permit.
2. Pujol Street Sidewalk Improvements - Phase H
This project will complete the knuckle at the intersection of Sixth Street and Felix Valdez. The project is on
hold.
3. Winchester Road Widening Between Enterprise Circle and Jefferson
This project will add a right turn lane from Eastbound Winchester to Southbound Jefferson, starting at
Enterprise Circle. O'Malley Engineering Corporation has provided the design survey data. Project is on hold.
4. Pala Road Interim Improvements - (Widening to accommodate four lanes from Loma Linda Bridge to
Wolf Valley)
Pala Road Interim Improvements (58 feet in width) will be completed with the second phase of construction of
the Pala Road Trunk Sewer (Pechanga Development Corporation project). An encroachment permit was
issued for the construction of the trunk sewer and the interim street improvements. Traffic signal and sthping
plans are complete. The construction of Pala Road Trunk Sewer (Phase Two) by the Pechanga Development
Corporation from Clubhouse Drive to the new Pechanga Casino Driveway (600 feet southeast of Wolf Valley
Road) started November 6, 2000 and the approximate completion date is Spring 2001. The interim project is
on hold due to environmental constraints.
5. Santa Gertrudis Bridge Widening at 1-15
This is Phase II of the Southbound Auxiliary Lane project at the southbound exit ramp for Winchester Road.
This project will widen the 1-15 southbound exit-ramp at the Santa Gertrudis Creek Br/dge to provide an
additional lane on the exit ramp just north of Winchester Road. Staff is revisiting the merits of this project in
light of the proposed Project Study Report for Chen'y Street Interchange. The study shows that this bridge may
have to be removed in the future to accommodate the Cherry Street Interchange. This project is suspended
indefinitely.
5 R:~v~on thlyActivityReporl\C1P~2001 \October. doc
6. Santiago Road/Ynez Road Intersection Improvements
This project will widen, realign, and adjust the traffic signal timing of the existing intersection. This project
has been delayed indefinitely. The Traffic Division completed some minor striping and signal adjustments
that improved traffic movement tlxrough the intersection.
6 R:hMonthlyActivityRepott\CIP~2001 \October.doc
Z
o
.J
a.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Bill Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
FROM:/~.~ Bred Buren, Maintenance Superintendent
DATE: November 5, 2001
SUBJECT:
Monthly Activity Report - October, 2001
The following activities were performed by Public Works Department, Street Maintenance Division in-house
personnel for the month of October, 2001:
I. SIGNS
A. Total signs replaced 211
B. Total signs installed 92
C, Total signs repaired -0-
II.
TREES
A, Total trees trimmed for sight distance and street sweeping concerns
III.
ASPHALT REPAIRS
a. Total square feet of A. C. repairs
B. Total Tons
IV.
CATCH BASINS
A. Total catch basins cleaned
267
RIGHT-OF-WAY WEED ABATEMENT
A. Total square footage for right-of-way abatement
7,200
VI.
VII.
GRAFFITI REMOVAL
A. Total locations
B. Total S.F.
STENCILING
A. 329 New and repainted legends
B. 1~051 L.F. of new and repainted red curb and stdping
34
.... 4~4~8
Also, City Maintenance staffresponded to 70 service order requests ranging from weed abatement, tree
trimming, sign repair, A.C. failures, litter removal, and catch basin cleanings. This is compared to 38
service order requests for the month of Sentember, 2001.
The Maintenance Crew has also put in 262 hours of overtime which includes standby time, special events
and response to street emergencies.
The total cost for Street Maintenance performed by Contractors for the month of October, 2001 was
$ 30,998.00 compared to $17~105.00 for the month of Se~ember, 2001.
Account. No. 5402 $ 22,313.00
Account No. 5401 $ 8,685.00
Account No. 999-5402 $ - 0 -
Ron Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works
Ali Moghadam, Senior Engineer- (ClP/Traffic)
Greg Butler, Senior Engineer - (Capital Improvements)
Amer Attar, Senior Engineer - (Capital Improvements)
JerryAlegria, Senior Engineer - (Land Development)