Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout17-46 PC Resolution PC RESOLUTION NO. 17-46 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT A RESOLUTION ENTITLED "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 36959 TO SUBDIVIDE 270 ACRES INTO 63 NUMBERED LOTS TO DEFINE THE OPEN SPACE AND THE VILLAGE AREAS, AND 20 LETTERED LOTS TO DEFINE PUBLIC AND PRIVATE STREETS FOR THE ALTAIR SPECIFIC PLAN GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH AND WEST OF THE INTERSECTION OF RIDGE PARK DRIVE AND VINCENT MORAGA; WEST OF PUJOL STREET AND MURRIETA CREEK; AND NORTH OF SANTA MARGARITA RIVER (APNS 922-210-049, 940-310-013, 940-310-015, 940-310-016, 940-310-044 THROUGH 940-310-048, AND 940-320-001 THROUGH 940-320-007)" Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On November 24, 2014, Rob Honer, representing Ambient Communities filed Planning Application Nos. PA14-0158, a General Plan Amendment; PA14-0159, a Specific Plan; PA14-0160, a Tentative Tract Map; and PA14-0161, a Development Agreement. These applications (collectively "proposed Project") were filed in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. The proposed Project was processed including, but not limited to, a public notice in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law, including the California Environmental Quality Act. C. An Environmental Impact Report (EIR), Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and Statement of Overriding Considerations were prepared for the proposed Project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act and the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines ("CEQA"). Thereafter, City staff circulated a Notice of Completion indicating the public comment period and intent to adopt the EIR as required by law. The public comment period commenced via the State Clearing House from May 2, 2016 through June 17, 2016. The City published a Notice of Availability for the Draft EIR in the San Diego Union Tribune, a newspaper of general circulation within the City. A Notice of Availability was also sent to adjacent property owners indicating a review period of May 2, 2016 through June 17, 2016. Copies of the documents have been available for public review and inspection at the offices of the Department of Community Development, located at City Hall, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California 92590; the Ronald H. Roberts Temecula Public Library located at 30600 Pauba Road; Temecula Grace Mellman Community Library located 41000 County Center Drive; and the City of Temecula website. D. On November 15, 2017, the Planning Commission considered a Final Environmental Impact Report ("EIR"), Planning Application Nos, PA14-0158, General Plan Amendment; PA14-0159, Altair Specific Plan; PA14-0160, Tentative Tract Map 36959; and PA14-0161 , a Development Agreement, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support of or opposition to this matter. E. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearing, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 17-43,"A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT A RESOLUTION CERTIFYING THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT, ADOPTING FINDINGS PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, ADOPTING A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS, AND ADOPTING A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM FOR THE ALTAIR PROJECT, CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 270 ACRES GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH AND WEST OF THE INTERSECTION OF RIDGE PARK DRIVE AND VINCENT MORAGA; WEST OF PUJOL STREET AND MURRIETA CREEK; AND NORTH OF SANTA MARGARITA RIVER (APNS 922-210-049, 940-310-013, 940-310-015, 940-310-016, 940-310-044 THROUGH 940-310-048, AND 940-320-001 THROUGH 940-320-007)." Resolution No. 17-43 and the findings therein are hereby incorporated by this reference as set forth in full. F. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in recommending approval of Tentative Tract Map 36959 application PA14-0160, makes the following findings as required by Temecula Municipal Code Section 16.09.140: A. The proposed subdivision and the design and improvements of the subdivision are consistent with the Development Code, General Plan, any applicable Specific Plan and the City of Temecula Municipal Code. As designed and conditioned, the proposed map is consistent with the Subdivision Ordinance, Temecula General Plan, and the City of Temecula Municipal Code. The map has been reviewed by Planning, Public Works and Fire Departments and is consistent with size, setbacks, parking, water quality and other applicable standards. The proposed subdivision will allow for the construction of up to 1,750 new homes for a range of household sizes, income, and demographics which is consistent with the General Plan. The Land Use Element of the General Plan identifies the objective for this area which is to `provide complimentary land uses to Old Town that increase the vitality of the area; to increase the range of the housing opportunities west of 1-15; and to encourage sensitive site and building design given the topography of the area." The subdivision will allow for a range of multifamily and detached housing types within walking distance of Old Town that will result in a vibrant combination of uses for the aggregate planning areas. The subdivision will satisfy the following implementation measure listed in LU-22 of the Land Use Element Implementation Program: "[p]roviding infill residential opportunities within the area and the adjacent Westside Specific Plan to create a nighttime population for the area." The proposed subdivision is also consistent with Goal 1 of the Housing Element which is to `provide a diversity of housing opportunities that satisfy the physical, social, and economic needs of existing and future residents of Temecula." Single-family detached houses represent 80% of the existing housing stock in the City. The proposed subdivision will create a mixture of housing which is needed in the City. Among other policies in the Housing Element, the proposed subdivision implements Policy 1.2 of the Housing Element which is to `(e]ncourage residential development that provides a range of housing types in terms of cost, density and type, and provides the opportunity for local residents to live and work in the same community by balancing jobs and housing types." It also implements Policy 1.3 which is to `fr]equire a mixture of diverse housing types and densities in new developments around the village centers to enhance their people orientation and diversity." B. The Tentative Map does not propose to divide land which is subject to a contract entered into pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965, or the land is subject to a Land Conservation Act contract but the resulting parcels following division of the land will not be too small to sustain their agricultural use. The land identified in the proposed map is not subject to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965 or Williamson Land Act. In addition, the land has not been used as agriculture in the recent past. C. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development proposed by the Tentative Map. The subject site consists of 270-acres of vacant land. The proposed map subdivides 270 acres to allow for residential, parks, mixed use, and civic/institutional uses. The proposed Tentative Tract Map design is consistent with the Temecula General Plan and the development standards for the Altair Specific Plan. D. An environmental impact report has been prepared and a finding has been made, pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21081(a) (3), finding that specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the environmental impact report. The proposed Project consists of a Tentative Tract Map on vacant property. An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) has been prepared for the proposed Project. Four impacts have been determined to be significant and unavoidable after all mitigation has been taken into account (Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, Noise and Vibration, and Traffic). A Statement of Overriding Considerations has been prepared for the proposed Project finding that specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the environmental impact report. E. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems. The design of the subdivision and improvements have been reviewed and conditioned by the Fire, Public Works, Planning, and Building and Safety Departments. As a result, the proposed Project is consistent or has been conditioned to be consistent with Fire and Building Codes and the City's General Plan and Municipal Code which contain provisions to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the public. F. The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision to the extent feasible. The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities to the extent feasible. All development must meet all appropriate Building and Fire Code requirements as they relate to passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities. G. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision, or the design of the alternate easements which are substantially equivalent to those previously acquired by the public will be provided. All acquired rights-of-way and easements have been provided on the Tentative Map. The City has reviewed these easements and has found no potential conflicts. H. The subdivision is consistent with the City's parkland dedication requirements (Quimby Act). The proposed Project involves the construction of a residential development. The project will meet all Quimby requirements through the provision of park improvements, and as outlined in the Development Agreement. Section 3. Recommendation. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 36959 TO SUBDIVIDE 270 ACRES INTO 63 NUMBERED LOTS TO DEFINE THE OPEN SPACE AND THE VILLAGE AREAS, AND 20 LETTERED LOTS TO DEFINE PUBLIC AND PRIVATE STREETS FOR THE ALTAIR SPECIFIC PLAN GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH AND WEST OF THE INTERSECTION OF RIDGE PARK DRIVE AND VINCENT MORAGA; WEST OF PUJOL STREET AND MURRIETA CREEK; AND NORTH OF SANTA MARGARITA RIVER (APNS 922- 210-049, 940-310-013, 940-310-015, 940-310-016, 940-310-044 THROUGH 940-310-048, AND 940-320-001 THROUGH 940-320-007)" in the form attached to this Resolution as Exhibit "A", and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 4. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 15th day of November, 2017. John elesio, Chairperson ATTEST: Luke Watson Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Luke Watson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 17-46 was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 15th day of November, 2017, by the following vote: AYES: 5 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Guerriero, Telesio, Turley-Trejo, Watts, Youmans NOES: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS NONE ABSENT: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS NONE ABSTAIN: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS NONE 4,3 Luke Watson Secretary ATTACHMENT 10.1 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION TTM 36959 RESOLUTION NO. - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 36959 TO SUBDIVIDE 270 ACRES INTO 63 NUMBERED LOTS TO DEFINE THE OPEN SPACE AND THE VILLAGE AREAS,AND 20 LETTERED LOTS TO DEFINE PUBLIC AND PRIVATE STREETS FOR THE ALTAIR SPECIFIC PLAN GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH AND WEST OF THE INTERSECTION OF RIDGE PARK DRIVE AND VINCENT MORAGA; WEST OF PUJOL STREET AND MURRIETA CREEK; AND NORTH OF SANTA MARGARITA RIVER (APNS 922-210-049, 940-310-013, 940-310-015,940-310-016,940-310-044 THROUGH 940-310-048, AND 940-320-001 THROUGH 940-320-007) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On November 24, 2014, Rob Honer, representing Ambient Communities filed Planning Application Nos. PA14-0158, a General Plan Amendment; PA14-0159, a Specific Plan; PA14-0160, a Tentative Tract Map; and PA14-0161, a Development Agreement. These applications (collectively"proposed Project")were filed in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. The proposed Project was processed including, but not limited to, a public notice in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law, including the California Environmental Quality Act. C. An Environmental Impact Report(EIR), Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and Statement of Overriding Considerations were prepared for the proposed Project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act and the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines ("CEQA"). Thereafter, City staff circulated a Notice of Completion indicating the public comment period and intent to adopt the EIR as required by law. The public comment period commenced via the State Clearing House from May 2, 2016 through June 17, 2016. The City published a Notice of Availability for the Draft EIR in the San Diego Union Tribune, a newspaper of general circulation within the City. A Notice of Availability was also sent to adjacent property owners indicating a review period of May 2, 2016 through June 17, 2016. Copies of the documents have been available for public review and inspection at the offices of the Department of Community Development, located at City Hall, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California 92590; the Ronald H. Roberts Temecula Public Library located at 30600 Pauba Road; Temecula Grace Mellman Community Library located 41000 County Center Drive; and the City of Temecula website. D. On November 15, 2017, the Planning Commission considered a Final Environmental Impact Report ("EIR"), Planning Application Nos. PA14-0158, General Plan Amendment; PA14-0159, Altair Specific Plan; PA14-0160, Tentative Tract Map 36959; and PA14-0161, a Development Agreement, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support of or opposition to this matter. E. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearing, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 17- "A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT A RESOLUTION CERTIFYING THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT, ADOPTING FINDINGS PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, ADOPTING A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS, AND ADOPTING A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM FOR THE ALTAIR PROJECT, CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 270 ACRES GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH AND WEST OF THE INTERSECTION OF RIDGE PARK DRIVE AND VINCENT MORAGA; WEST OF PUJOL STREET AND MURRIETA CREEK; AND NORTH OF SANTA MARGARITA RIVER (APNS 922-210-049, 940-310-013, 940-310-015, 940-310-016, 940-310-044 THROUGH 940-310-048, AND 940-320-001 THROUGH 940-320-007)." F. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearings and due consideration of the proposed Project, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 17- "A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT A RESOLUTION ENTITLED 'A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 36959 TO SUBDIVIDE 270 ACRES INTO 63 NUMBERED LOTS TO DEFINE THE OPEN SPACE AND THE VILLAGE AREAS, AND 20 LETTERED LOTS TO DEFINE PUBLIC AND PRIVATE STREETS FOR THE ALTAIR SPECIFIC PLAN GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH AND WEST OF THE INTERSECTION OF RIDGE PARK DRIVE AND VINCENT MORAGA; WEST OF PUJOL STREET AND MURRIETA CREEK; AND NORTH OF SANTA MARGARITA RIVER(APNS 922- 210-049, 940-310-013, 940-310-015, 940-310-016, 940-310-044 THROUGH 940-310-048, AND 940-320-001 THROUGH 940-320-007)."' G. On December 12, 2017, the City Council of the City of Temecula considered the proposed Project and the EIR, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and Statement of Overriding Considerations, at a duly noticed public hearing at which time all interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. The City Council considered all the testimony and any comments received regarding the proposed Project and the Final EIR, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and Statement of Overriding Considerations prior to and at the public hearing. H. Following the public hearing, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 17-— "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA CERTIFYING THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT, ADOPTING FINDINGS PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, ADOPTING A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS,AND ADOPTING A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM FOR THE ALTAIR PROJECT, CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 270 ACRES, GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH AND WEST OF THE INTERSECTION OF RIDGE PARK DRIVE AND VINCENT MORAGA; WEST OF PUJOL STREET AND MURRIETA CREEK; AND NORTH OF SANTA MARGARITA RIVER (APNS 922-210-049, 940-310-013, 940-310-015, 940-310-016, 940-310-044 THROUGH 940-310-048, AND 940-320-001 THROUGH 940-320-007)." Resolution No. 17- and the findings therein are hereby incorporated by this reference as set forth in full. I. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. The City Council in approving the Tentative Tract Map hereby makes the following findings as required by Temecula Municipal Code Section 16.09.140: A. The proposed subdivision and the design and improvements of the subdivision are consistent with the Development Code, General Plan, any applicable Specific Plan and the City of Temecula Municipal Code. As designed and conditioned, the proposed map is consistent with the Subdivision Ordinance, Temecula General Plan, and the City of Temecula Municipal Code. The map has been reviewed by Planning, Public Works and Fire Departments and is consistent with size, setbacks, parking, water quality and other applicable standards. The proposed subdivision will allow for the construction of up to 1,750 new homes for a range of household sizes, income, and demographics which is consistent with the General Plan. The Land Use Element of the General Plan identifies the objective for this area which is to "provide complimentary land uses to Old Town that increase the vitality of the area; to increase the range of the housing opportunities west of 1-15; and to encourage sensitive site and building design given the topography of the area." The subdivision will allow for a range of multifamily and detached housing types within walking distance of Old Town that will result in a vibrant combination of uses for the aggregate planning areas. The subdivision will satisfy the following implementation measure listed in LU-22 of the Land Use Element Implementation Program: "(pjroviding infill residential opportunities within the area and the adjacent Westside Specific Plan to create a nighttime population for the area." The proposed subdivision is also consistent with Goal 1 of the Housing Element which is to "provide a diversity of housing opportunities that satisfy the physical, social, and economic needs of existing and future residents of Temecula." Single-family detached houses represent 80% of the existing housing stock in the City. The proposed subdivision will create a mixture of housing which is needed in the City. Among other policies in the Housing Element, the proposed subdivision implements Policy 1.2 of the Housing Element which is to "[elncourage residential development that provides a range of housing types in terms of cost, density and type, and provides the opportunity for local residents to live and work in the same community by balancing jobs and housing types." It also implements Policy 1.3 which is to "jrjequire a mixture of diverse housing types and densities in new developments around the village centers to enhance their people orientation and diversity." B. The Tentative Map does not propose to divide land which is subject to a contract entered into pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965, or the land is subject to a Land Conservation Act contract but the resulting parcels following division of the land will not be too small to sustain their agricultural use. The land identified in the proposed map is not subject to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965 or Williamson Land Act. In addition, the land has not been used for agriculture in the recent past. C. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development proposed by the Tentative Map. The subject site consists of 270-acres of vacant land. The proposed map subdivides 270 acres to allow for residential, parks, mixed use, and civic/institutional uses. The proposed Tentative Tract Map design is consistent with the Temecula General Plan and the development standards for the Altair Specific Plan. D. An environmental impact report has been prepared and a finding has been made, pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21081(a) (3), finding that specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the environmental impact report. The proposed Project consists of a Tentative Tract Map on vacant property. An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) has been prepared for the proposed Project. Four impacts have been determined to be significant and unavoidable after all mitigation has been taken into account(Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, Noise and Vibration, and Traffic). A Statement of Overriding Considerations has been prepared for the proposed Project finding that specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the environmental impact report. E. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems. The design of the subdivision and improvements have been reviewed and conditioned by the Fire, Public Works, Planning, and Building and Safety Departments. As a result, the proposed Project is consistent or has been conditioned to be consistent with Fire and Building Codes and the City's General Plan and Municipal Code which contain provisions to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the public. F. The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision to the extent feasible. The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities to the extent feasible. All development must meet all appropriate Building and Fire Code requirements as they relate to passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities. G. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision, or the design of the alternate easements which are substantially equivalent to those previously acquired by the public will be provided. All acquired rights-of-way and easements have been provided on the Tentative Map. The City has reviewed these easements and has found no potential conflicts. H. The subdivision is consistent with the City's parkland dedication requirements (Quimby Act). The proposed Project involves the construction of a residential development. The proposed Project will meet all Quimby requirements through the provision of park improvements, and as outlined in the Development Agreement. Section 3. Conditions of Approval. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby approves Planning Application No. PA14-0160, Tentative Tract Map 36959 to subdivide 270 acres into 63 numbered lots to define the open space and village areas, and 20 lettered lots to define public and private streets for the Altair Specific Plan generally located south and west of the intersection of Ridge Park Drive and Vincent Moraga, west of Pujol Street and Murrieta Creek, and north of the Santa Margarita River (APNS 922-210-049, 940-310-013, 940-310-015, 940-310-016, 940-310-044 through 940-310-048, and 940-320-001 through 940-320-007), subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 4. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect upon the effective date of Ordinance No. "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE ALTAIR SPECIFIC PLAN#15 ON APPROXIMATELY 270 ACRES GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH AND WEST OF THE INTERSECTION OF RIDGE PARK DRIVE AND VINCENT MORAGA; WEST OF PUJOL STREET AND MURRIETA CREEK; AND NORTH OF SANTA MARGARITA RIVER (APNS 922-210- 049, 940-310-013, 940-310-015, 940-310-016, 940-310-044 THROUGH 940-310-048, AND 940-320-001 THROUGH 940-320-007)." Section 5. Notice of Adoption. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and cause it to be published in the manner required by law. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this day of Maryann Edwards, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. - was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the day of by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl, City Clerk ATTACHMENT 10A CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (TTM 36959) EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No.: PA14-0160 Project Description: A proposed Tentative Tract Map (TTM 36959, -1, -2, and -3)for "Altair," on 270 acres in the southwesterly portion of the City of Temecula west of Old Town Assessor's Parcel No.: 922-210-049, 940-310-013, 940-310-015, 940-310-016, 940-310- 044 through 940-310-048, and 940-320-001 through 940-320-007 MSHCP Category: Credits per the Development Agreement (PA14-0161) DIF Category: Credits per the Development Agreement (PA14-0161) TUMF Category: Credits per the Development Agreement (PA14-0161) QUIMBY Category: Exempt per the Development Agreement (PA14-0161) Approval Date: Expiration Date: PLANNING DIVISION Within 48 Hours of Approval 1. Filing Notice of Determination. The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Division a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Three Thousand One Hundred and Twenty Hundred Dollars and Zero Cents ($3,128.00) which includes the Three Thousand and Seventy Dollars and Zero Cents ($3,078.00) fee, required by Fish and Wildlife Code Section 711.4(d)(3) plus the Fifty Dollars ($50.00) County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination for the Environmental Impact Report required under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15904. If within said 48-hour period the applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Division the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition(Fish and Wildlife Code Section 711.4(c)). General Requirements 2. Indemnification of the City. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City and its attorneys from any and all claims, actions, awards,judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. 3. Expiration. This approval shall be used within twenty (20) years per the Development Agreement; otherwise, it shall become null and void. Use means the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the three-year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval, or use of a property in conformance with a Conditional Use Permit. 4. Time Extension. The Director of Community Development may, upon an application being filed prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant up to five extensions of time, one year at a time. 5. Consistency with Specific Plans. This project and all subsequent projects within this site shall be consistent with Specific Plan No. 15,Altair Specific Plan. 6. Consistency with Development Agreements. The project and all subsequent projects within this site shall be subject to Development Agreement(PA14-0161). 7. Compliance with EIR. The project and all subsequent projects within this site shall comply with all mitigation measures identified within the EIR for Altair(SCH No. 2014111029). 8. Signage Permits. A separate building permit shall be required for all signage. 9. Landscape Maintenance. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable satisfaction of the Director of Community Development. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being maintained, the Director of Community Development shall have the authority to require the property owner to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any successors in interest. 10. Graffiti. All graffiti shall be removed within 24 hours on telecommunication towers, equipment, walls, or other structures. 11. Water Quality and Drainage. Other than stormwater, it is illegal to allow liquids, gels, powders, sediment, fertilizers, landscape debris, and waste from entering the storm drain system or from leaving the property. To ensure compliance with this Condition of Approval: a. Spills and leaks shall be cleaned up immediately. b. Do not wash, maintain, or repair vehicles onsite. c. Do not hose down parking areas, sidewalks, alleys, or gutters. d. Ensure that all materials and products stored outside are protected from rain. e. Ensure all trash bins are covered at all times. 12. Modifications or Revisions. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this project. 13. Phased Construction. If construction is phased, a construction staging area plan or phasing plan for construction equipment and trash shall be approved by the Director of Community Development. 14. Subdivision Map Act. The tentative subdivision shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act and to all the requirements of Ordinance No. 460, unless modified by the conditions listed below. An Extension of Time may be approved in accordance with the State Map Act and City Ordinance, upon written request, if made 60 days prior to the expiration date. 15. Subdivision Phasing. If subdivision phasing is proposed, a phasing plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Community Development Director. 16. Public Art Ordinance. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the City's Public Art Ordinance as defined in Section 5.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code. 17. Property Maintenance. All parkways, including within the right-of-way, entryway median, landscaping, walls, fencing, recreational facilities, and on-site lighting shall be maintained by the property owner or maintenance association. 18. Class I Multi-Use Trails. Class I multi-use trails shall be provided as per the City of Temecula's Multi-Use Trails and Bikeways Master Plan, the Tentative Tract Map and the Specific Plan. The construction plans for the Class 1 trails shall be included on the perimeter landscape plans and constructed in concurrence with the installation of the landscaping. 19. Class II Bicycle Lanes. Class II bicycle lanes, as specified in the City of Temecula Multi-Use Trails and Bikeways Master Plan, , the Tentative Tract Map and the Specific Plan, shall be identified on the street improvement plans, and constructed in concurrence with the street improvements. 20. Mitigation Monitoring Program. The Altair project is required to comply with all mitigation measures identified in the Final EIR, and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP). 21. Maximum Number of Rental Units(Apartments). Prior to the issuance of a building permit by the City for a residential community in the Project, the Guest Builder shall provide a letter to the City declaring whether the project will include residential units for sale to homeowners(a"For-Sale Community")or residential units for rent(Apartments)to tenants (a "For-Rent Community"), and if it is a For-Rent Community, the number of Rental Units being proposed for the For-Rent Community. Further, in conjunction with the overall development of the Project, the Guest Builder will also provide a list of all previously approved For-Sale and For-Rent Communities in the Project and the number of Rental Units for each For Rent Community. There shall be a maximum of 750 Rental Units within the Project. Notwithstanding the forgoing, homes that are in a For-Sale Community that are sold to individuals and then later rented to the public shall not count towards the 750 Rental Unit threshold. 22. Project Phasing. The project shall be built in four phases per the attached "Phasing Exhibit, 10D." Infrastructure shall be required prior to the issuance of building permits in each phase per the phasing plan. 23. Fiscal Impact Compliance. Any development within the Altair Specific Plan will be required to address impacts to the City's budget as a result of the increased costs to the City of providing public safety and other municipal services to the Project area substantially exceeding the municipal revenue generated from the Project("City Services Deficit"). The City has a received a Fiscal Impact Analysis dated October, 2017 ("FIA"), documenting the City Services Deficit. The owners of the property within the Project, and their successors of interest, at the time a certificate of occupancy is issued for a residential dwelling, shall pay the City the sum of two- hundred thirty-seven ($237) per residential dwelling unit within the project each year as mitigation for the City Services Deficit. Owner and its successors to the property within the Project may fulfill this obligation through a Community Facilities District Act of 1982, Government Code Section 53311, et seq., provided however,the obligation of each owner and their successors to the pay the City Services Deficit payment under this obligation remains an obligation of the owner and its successors regardless of the financing mechanism used to pay it and regardless of whether there is a financing mechanism to pay it. 24. Trail Siting and Location on the South Parcel/Civic Site. In addition to the mitigation measures identified in the Final EIR for cultural resources, MM-CUL-1a through MM-CUL- 3, City Staff will work with the Pechanga Tribe to determine the final trail alignment for an out and back, or loop trail. Using trail siting guidance identified in the Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) Section 7.0, the trail will utilize existing dirt roads whenever possible. Portions of existing trail may be eliminated, and revegetated to protect environmentally sensitive areas. Any new trail segment will be designed to discourage and prevent intrusion into adjacent environmentally sensitive areas. 25. Direction Fencing. Directional Fencing for wildlife shall be required as identified in the Specific Plan, EIR, and in conformance with the Western Riverside County Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP). Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit 26. Central Park Design Meeting. Prior to the issuance of any grading permits associated with the Central park area, a pre-design meeting shall be held to include Planning, TCSD, and Public Works to complete a final design for the Central Park. The Altair Specific Plan includes a conceptual plan for the park, however, final arrangement and location of amenities shall be determined prior to any grading and/or construction. 27. Placement of Transformer. Provide the Planning Division with a copy of the underground water plans and electrical plans for verification of proper placement of transformer(s) and double detector check valves prior to final agreement with the utility companies. 28. Placement of Double Detector Check Valves. Double detector check valves shall be installed at locations that minimize their visibility from the public right-of-way, subject to review and approval by the Director of Community Development. 29. Pechanga Mitigation Measures. The Altair project is required to comply with Mitigation measures MM-CUL-1a through MM-CUL-3. 30. Archaeological/Cultural Resources Grading Note. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "If at any time during excavation/construction of the site, archaeological/cultural resources, or any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the affected area to immediately cease. The Director of Community Development at his/her sole discretion may require the property owner to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to consult and/or authorize an independent,fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find. Upon determining that the discovery is not an archaeological/ cultural resource, the Director of Community Development shall notify the property owner of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining that the discovery is an archaeological/cultural resource,the Director of Community Development shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or development may take place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the Director of Community Development." 31. Cultural Resources Treatment Agreement. The developer is required to enter into a Cultural Resources Treatment Agreement with the Pechanga Tribe. This Agreement will address the treatment and disposition of cultural resources and human remains that may be impacted as a result of the development of the project, as well as provisions for tribal monitors. 32. Discovery of Cultural Resources. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "If cultural resources are discovered during the project construction (inadvertent discoveries), all work in the area of the find shall cease, and a qualified archaeologist and representatives of the Pechanga Tribe shall be retained by the project sponsor to investigate the find, and make recommendations as to treatment and mitigation." 33. Archaeological Monitoring of Cultural Resources. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "A qualified archaeological monitor will be present and will have the authority to stop and redirect grading activities, in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe and their designated monitors, to evaluate the significance of any archaeological resources discovered on the property." 34. Tribal Monitoring of Cultural Resources. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "Tribal monitors from the Pechanga Tribe shall be allowed to monitor all grading, excavation and groundbreaking activities, including all archaeological surveys, testing, and studies, to be compensated by the developer." 35. Relinquishment of Cultural Resources. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "The landowner agrees to relinquish ownership of all cultural resources, including all archaeological artifacts that are found on the project area, to the Pechanga Tribe for proper treatment and disposition." 36. Preservation of Sacred Sites. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "All sacred sites are to be avoided and preserved." 37. Mitigation Measure MM-CUL-1a—Retention of a Qualified Archaeologist. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and prior to the start of any ground disturbing activity, the applicant shall retain a qualified archaeologist, defined as an archaeologist meeting the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualification Standards for archaeology (Department of the Interior, 2012), and as approved by the City of Temecula, to carry out all mitigation measures related to archaeological resources and to coordinate the archaeological program with the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians (Pechanga Tribe). The Project archaeologist will have the authority to stop and redirect grading in the immediate area of a find in order to evaluate the find and determine the appropriate next steps, in consultation with the Pechanga Tribal Monitor. 38. Mitigation Measure MM-CUL-1b - Retention of a Professional Pechanga Tribal Monitor. At least 30 days prior to seeking a grading permit, the project Applicant shall contact the Pechanga Tribe to notify the Tribe of their intent to pull permits for the proposed grading and excavation, and to coordinate with the Tribe to develop a Cultural Resources Treatment and Monitoring Agreement. The Agreement shall address the treatment of known cultural resources, the designation, responsibilities, and participation of professional Pechanga Tribal Monitors during grading, excavation and ground disturbing activities; project grading and development scheduling; terms of compensation for the monitors, including overtime and weekend rates, in addition to mileage reimbursement; and treatment and final disposition of any cultural resource, sacred sites,and human remains discovered on the site.The Pechanga Tribal Monitor will have the authority to stop and redirect grading in the immediate area of a find in order to evaluate the find and determine the appropriate next steps, in consultation with the Project archaeologist. Such evaluation shall include culturally appropriate temporary and permanent treatment pursuant to the Agreement which may include avoidance of cultural resources, in-place preservation and/or re-burial on the project property in an area that will not be subject to future disturbances for preservation in perpetuity. 39. Mitigation Measure MM-CUL-1c — Cultural Resources Sensitivity Training The qualified archeologist, or an archaeologist working under the direction of the qualified archaeologist, and a representative of the Pechanga Tribe shall conduct preconstruction cultural resources sensitivity training which will include a brief review of the cultural sensitivity of the project and the surrounding area to inform construction personnel of the types of cultural resources that may be encountered,and of the proper procedures to be enacted in the event of an inadvertent discovery of archaeological resources or human remains. The applicant shall ensure that construction personnel are made available for and attend the training and shall retain documentation demonstrating attendance. All new construction personnel that begin work on the Project following the initial Training must take the cultural resources sensitivity training prior to beginning work and the project archaeologist and Pechanga Tribe shall make themselves available to provide the training on an as-needed basis. 40. Mitigation Measure MM-CUL-1d — Archaeological and Native American Monitoring and Resurvey of the South Parcel. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and prior to the start of any vegetation removal or ground disturbing activity, a qualified archaeological monitor and Pechanga Tribal monitor shall be retained by the applicant to monitor ground disturbing activities including, but not limited to, brush clearance and grubbing, grading, trenching, excavation, and the construction of fencing and access roads as indicated in MM-CUL-1 a and 1 b. The archaeological and Pechanga Tribal monitors shall re-survey the South Parcel involving ground disturbance, after vegetation removal and grubbing and prior to other ground disturbing activities. This will ensure that previously undocumented resources obscured by thick brush can be identified and appropriate treatment measures for the resources can be developed.Archaeological monitoring shall be conducted by an archaeologist familiar with the types of historic and prehistoric resources that could be encountered within the project, and under direct supervision of the qualified archaeologist. If ground disturbing activities occur simultaneous in two or more locations located more than 500 feet apart, additional archaeological and Pechanga Tribal monitors may be required. The archaeological and Pechanga Tribal monitors shall keep daily and/or weekly logs. After monitoring has been completed, the qualified archaeologist shall prepare a monitoring report that details the results of monitoring, which shall be submitted to the City, Pechanga, and to the Eastern Information Center at the University of California, Riverside. 41. Mitigation Measure MM-CUL-1e — Unanticipated Discovery. If cultural resources are encountered during the course of ground disturbing activities, the applicant shall cease any ground disturbing activities within 100 feet of the find until it can be evaluated by the qualified archaeologist, who shall inspect the find within 24 hours of discovery, during normal working hours. The qualified archaeologist, the archaeological monitor, and/or Native American monitor shall be empowered to halt or redirect ground disturbing activities away from the vicinity of the find until it has been assessed for significance. The qualified archaeologist, in consultation with the applicant and the Pechanga Tribe, shall assess the significance of discovered resources and shall take into account the religious beliefs, customs, and practices of the Pechanga Tribe.Avoidance shall be the preferred manner of mitigation pursuant to Calif. Pub. Res.Code§21083.2(b). Preservation in place may be accomplished by, but is not limited to, complete avoidance, incorporating the resource into open space, or deeding the site into a permanent conservation easement. In the event that preservation in place is demonstrated to be infeasible and data recovery through excavation is determined to be the only feasible mitigation option, a treatment plan shall be prepared and implemented by the qualified archaeologist, in consultation with the applicant and the Pechanga Tribe. The treatment plan shall provide for the adequate recovery of the scientifically consequential information contained in the archaeological resource. The Pechanga Tribe shall be consulted to ensure that cultural values ascribed to the resource, beyond that which is scientifically important, are considered and additional appropriate mitigation to address the cultural values is applied.The treatment plan shall also provide for the analysis, reporting, and curation/disposition of resources in accordance with the Treatment Agreement required in MM-CUL-1 b. 42. Mitigation Measure MM-CUL-1f—Completed Avoidance of Impacts to the TCP. The City and the Project Applicant/Land Owner shall ensure that no impacts occur to the Traditional Cultural Property south of the proposed South Parcel Area. This includes, but is not limited to off-site improvements, staging activities, trenching, geotechnical work, Riverside County Flood Control improvements, Water Department impacts, Public Works projects, biological and fire control programs, and any other program or project that would affect the integrity of the TCP. Should any of these activities, or others as indicated, be proposed, the City and the Applicant/Land Owner shall contact the Pechanga Tribe for additional consultation and review. 43. Mitigation Measure MM-CUL-2a — Paleontological Resource Impact Mitigation Program (PRIMP). The applicant shall implement the paleontological mitigation program outlined in the PRIMP (Kennedy and Wirths, 2013) during project implementation. The PRIMP requires paleontological monitoring of mapped exposures of the sandstone facies of the Pauba Formation (Qp) as shown on Attachment 3a of the PRIMP. In addition, because the fanglomerate facies of the Pauba Formation is considered to have undetermined potential to yield significant paleontological resources, initial excavations into the unit shall be spot- checked by a qualified paleontologist (defined as a paleontologist meeting the Society for Vertebrate Paleontology Standards, 2010)to determine if the lithology of the geological unit is conducive to the preservation of unique paleontological resources.The qualified paleontologist shall also contribute to any construction worker cultural resources sensitivity training, either in person or via a module provided to the qualified archaeologist. Monitoring shall be conducted by a qualified paleontologist, or a monitor working under the direct supervision of a qualified paleontologist. Monitors shall have the authority to temporarily halt or divert work away from exposed fossils in order to recover the fossil specimens. The qualified paleontologist, based on observations of subsurface soil stratigraphy or other factors, may reduce or discontinue monitoring, as warranted, if the qualified paleontologist determines that the possibility of encountering fossiliferous deposits is low. Monitors shall prepare daily logs detailing the types of activities and soils observed, and any discoveries. Any fossils recovered shall be prepared to the point of identification and curated at an accredited facility. The qualified paleontologist shall prepare a final monitoring and mitigation report to be submitted to the City and filed with the local repository. 44. Mitigation Measure MM-CUL-2b - Unanticipated Paleontological Resources Discoveries. If construction or other project personnel discover any potential fossils during construction, regardless of the depth of work, work at the discovery location shall cease until the qualified paleontologist has assessed the discovery and made recommendations as to the appropriate treatment. 45. Mitigation Measure MM-CUL-3 — Human Remains. If human remains are uncovered during project construction, the applicant shall immediately halt work and follow the procedures and protocols set forth in Section 15064.5(e) of the CEQA Guidelines, which require compliance with Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 and Public Resources Code Section 5097.98(as amended by AB 2641).The applicant shall immediately contact the Riverside County Coroner to evaluate the remains. If the County Coroner determines that the remains are Native American and not subject to his or her authority, the County Coroner shall notify the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) within 24 hours. The NAHC shall designate a Most Likely Descendant (MLD) for the remains, who shall have 48 hours from the time of being granted access to the site to provide recommendations to the landowner for the means of treating or disposing of,with appropriate dignity,the human remains and any associated grave goods. Until the landowner has discussed and conferred with the MLD, the landowner shall ensure that the immediate vicinity where the discovery occurred is not subject to further disturbances, is adequately protected according to generally accepted cultural and archaeological standards, and that further activities take into account the possibility of multiple burials. In the event that no MLD is identified, or if the MLD fails to make a recommendation for disposition, or if the landowner rejects the recommendation of the MLD and mediation with the NAHC fails to provide measures acceptable to the landowner, the landowner may reinter the remains and associated grave goods with appropriate dignity on the property in a location not subject to further disturbance. 46. MSHCP Pre-Construction Survev. A 30-day preconstruction survey, in accordance with MSHCP guidelines and survey protocol, shall be conducted prior to ground disturbance. The results of the 30-day preconstruction survey shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to scheduling the pre-grading meeting with Public Works. 47. Burrowing Owl Grading Note. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "No grubbing/clearing of the site shall occur prior to scheduling the pre-grading meeting with Public Works. All project sites containing suitable habitat for burrowing owls, whether owls were found or not, require a 30-day preconstruction survey that shall be conducted within 30 days prior to ground disturbance to avoid direct take of burrowing owls. If the results of the survey indicate that no burrowing owls are present on-site, then the project may move forward with grading, upon Planning Division approval. If burrowing owls are found to be present or nesting on-site during the preconstruction survey, then the following recommendations must be adhered to: Exclusion and relocation activities may not occur during the breeding season,which is defined as March 1 through August 31,with the following exception: From March 1 through March 15 and from August 1 through August 31 exclusion and relocation activities may take place if it is proven to the City and appropriate regulatory agencies (if any) that egg laying or chick rearing is not taking place. This determination must be made by a qualified biologist." 48. Rough Grading Plans. A copy of the Rough Grading Plans shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Division. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit 49. Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). The City of Temecula adopted an ordinance on March 31, 2003 to collect fees for a Riverside County area wide Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee(TUMF). This project is subject to payment of these fees at the time of building permit issuance per the Development Agreement (PA14-0161). The fees are subject to the provisions of Chapter 15.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code and the fee schedule in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 50. Development Impact Fee (DIF). The developer shall comply with the provisions of Title 15, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all its resolutions by paying the appropriate City fee per the Development Agreement(PA14-0161). 51. Quimby Requirements. Per the Development Agreement, the developer has satisfied the City's parkland dedication (Quimby) requirement through the provision of parks and open space identified in the Altair Specific Plan. These parks will be privately maintained, but open to the public. The Central Park in Village C will be dedicated to the City per the Development Agreement(PA14-0161). 52. Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans. Four(4) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division. These plans shall be submitted as a separate submittal, not as part of the building plans or other plan set. These plans shall conform to the approved conceptual landscape plan, or as amended by these conditions. The location, number, height and spread, water usage or KC value, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance and Water Storage Contingency Plan per the Rancho California Water District. The plans shall be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal) and one copy of the approved Grading Plan. 53. Landscaping Site Inspections. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include a note stating, "Three landscape site inspections are required. The first inspection will be conducted at installation of irrigation while trenches are open. This will verify that irrigation equipment and layout is per plan specifications and details. Any adjustments or discrepancies in actual conditions will be addressed at this time and will require an approval to continue. Where applicable, a mainline pressure check will also be conducted. This will verify that the irrigation mainline is capable of being pressurized to 150 psi for a minimum period of two hours without loss of pressure. The second inspection will verify that all irrigation systems are operating properly, and to verify that all plantings have been installed consistent with the approved construction landscape plans. The third inspection will verify property landscape maintenance for release of the one-year landscape maintenance bond." The applicant/owner shall contact the Planning Division to schedule inspections. 54. Agronomic Soils Report. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include a note on the plans stating, "The contractor shall provide two copies of an agronomic soils report at the first irrigation inspection." 55. Water Usage Calculations. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code(Water Efficient Ordinance), the total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with approved plan). Applicant shall use evapotranspiration (ETo) factor of 0.70 for calculating the maximum allowable water budget. 56. Landscape Maintenance Program. A landscape maintenance program shall be submitted to the Planning Division for approval. The landscape maintenance program shall detail the proper maintenance of all proposed plant materials to assure proper growth and landscape development for the long-term esthetics of the property. The approved maintenance program shall be provided to the landscape maintenance contractor who shall be responsible to carry out the detailed program. 57. Specifications of Landscape Maintenance Program. Specifications of the landscape maintenance program shall indicate, "Three landscape site inspections are required. The first inspection will be conducted at installation of irrigation while trenches are open. This will verify that irrigation equipment and layout is per plan specifications and details. Any adjustments or discrepancies in actual conditions will be addressed at this time and will require an approval to continue. Where applicable, a mainline pressure check will also be conducted. This will verify that the irrigation mainline is capable of being pressurized to 150 psi for a minimum period of two hours without loss of pressure. The second inspection will verify that all irrigation systems are operating properly, and to verify that all plantings have been installed consistent with the approved construction landscape plans. The third inspection will verify property landscape maintenance for release of the one-year landscape maintenance bond."The applicant/owner shall contact the Planning Division to schedule inspections. 58. Irrigation. The landscaping plans shall include automatic irrigation for all landscaped areas and complete screening of all ground mounted equipment from view of the public from streets and adjacent property for private common areas;front yards and slopes within individual lots; shrub planting to completely screen perimeter walls adjacent to a public right-of-way equal to 66 feet or larger; and, all landscaping excluding City maintained areas and front yard landscaping which shall include, but may not be limited to, private slopes and common areas. 59. Wall and Fence Plans. Wall and fence plans shall be reviewed with all landscape plans, and shall be consistent with the Altair Specific Plan. 60. Precise Grading Plans. Precise Grading Plans shall be consistent with the approved rough grading plans including all structural setback measurements. 61. Landscaping Requirement for Phased Development. If any phase or area of the project site is not scheduled for development within six months of the completion of grading, the landscaping plans shall indicate it will be temporarily landscaped and irrigated for dust and soil erosion control. 62. WQMP Landscape Compliance. The construction landscape plans shall be consistent with Appendix A, Table 31 of the Low Impact Development (LID) Manual for Southern California for plant materials and treatment facilities, and shall reference the approved precise grading plan for WQMP features. 63. Utility Screening. All utilities shall be screened from public view. Landscape construction drawings shall show and label all utilities and provide appropriate screening. Provide a three-foot clear zone around fire check detectors as required by the Fire Department before starting the screen. Group utilities together in order to reduce intrusion. Screening of utilities is not to look like an after-thought. Plan planting beds and design around utilities. Locate all light poles on plans and ensure that there are no conflicts with trees. Prior to Release of Power, Building Occupancy or Any Use Allowed by This Permit 64. Landscape Installation Consistent with Construction Plans. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with the approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Director of Community Development. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working order. 65. Performance Securities. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Community Development, to guarantee the maintenance of the plantings in accordance with the approved construction landscape and irrigation plan, shall be filed with the Planning Division for a period of one year from final Certificate of Occupancy. After that year, if the landscaping and irrigation system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the Director of Community Development, the bond shall be released upon request by the applicant. 66. Compliance with Conditions of Approval. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. Prior to Recordation of the Final Map 67. Final Map. A copy of the Final Map for each phase shall be submitted to, and approved by, the Planning Division. 68. Environmental Constraint Sheet. A copy of the Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) shall be submitted to, and approved by, the Planning Division with the following notes: a. This property is located within 30 miles of Mount Palomar Observatory. All proposed outdoor lighting systems shall comply with the California Institute of Technology, Palomar Observatory recommendations, Ordinance No. 655. 69. Submittal of CC&Rs. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs)for the project or any phase thereof shall be submitted and approved by the Director of Community Development. The CC&Rs shall include liability insurance and methods of maintaining open space, recreation areas, parking areas, private roads, exterior of all buildings, and landscaped and open areas, including parkways. Applicants shall provide a deposit in the amount of $3,750 for the review of the CC&Rs. Amended CC&Rs will require a $2,000 deposit. The applicant shall be responsible for al costs incurred during review of the CC&Rs and additional fees may be required during the course of the review. 70. Form and Content of CC&Rs. The CC&Rs shall be in the form and content approved by the Director of Community Development, City Engineer, and the City Attorney, and shall include such provisions as are required by this approval and as said officials deem necessary to protect the interests of the City and its residents. 71. Preparation of CC&Rs. The CC&Rs shall be prepared at the developer's sole cost and expense. 72. Review of CC&Rs. The CC&Rs and Articles of Incorporation of the Property Owners Association are subject to the approval of the Director of Community Development, Public Works Director, and the City Attorney. 73. CC&Rs and Management and Maintenance of Common Areas. The CC&Rs shall provide for the effective establishment, operation, management, use, repair, and maintenance of all common areas, drainage facilities, and pollution prevention devices outlined in the Water Quality Management Plan for the project or any phase thereof. 74. CC&Rs and Public Nuisance. The CC&Rs shall provide that the property shall be developed, operated, and maintained so as not to create a public nuisance. 75. Termination of CC&Rs. The CC&Rs shall provide that the association may not be terminated without prior City approval. 76. CC&Rs and Maintenance of Property. The CC&Rs shall provide that if the property is not maintained in the condition required by the CC&Rs, then the City, after making due demand and giving reasonable notice, may enter the property and perform, at the owner's sole expense, any maintenance required thereon by the CC&Rs or the City Ordinances. The property shall be subject to a lien in favor of the City to secure any such expense not promptly reimbursed. 77. Interest in Association. Every owner of a suite or lot governed by CC&Rs shall own as an appurtenance to such suite or lot, either: (1) an undivided interest in the common areas and facilities, or (2) a share in the corporation, or voting membership in an association owning the common areas and facilities. 78. Maintenance of Open Areas. All open areas and landscaping governed by CC&R shall be permanently maintained by the association or other means acceptable to the City. Such proof of this maintenance shall be submitted to the Planning Divisions and Public Works Department prior to the issuance of building permits. 79. Reciprocal Easements. Reciprocal access easements and maintenance agreements ensuring access to all parcels and joint maintenance of all roads, drives, parking areas, drainage facilities, and water quality features, shall be provided by the CC&Rs or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrent with the map or prior to the issuance of building permit where no map is involved. 80. Consent of City of Temecula. An Article must be added to every set of CC&Rs, following the Declarant's signature, to read as follows: CONSENT OF CITY OF TEMECULA The Conditions of Approval for Tentative Tract Map No. 36959, -1, -2, and -3, require the City of Temecula to review and approve the CC&Rs for the Parcel. The City's review of these CC&Rs has been limited to a determination of whether the proposed CC&Rs properly implement the requirements of the Conditions of Approval for the Parcel. The City's consent to these CC&Rs does not contain or imply any approval of the appropriateness or legality of the other provisions of the CC&Rs, including, without limitation, the use restrictions, private easements and encroachments, private maintenance requirements, architecture and landscape controls, assessments, enforcement of assessments, resolutions of disputes or procedural matters. Subject to the limitations set forth herein, the City consents to the CC&Rs. Luke Watson Director Community Development Approved as to Form: Peter M. Thorson City Attorney 81. Operation of Association. No lot or suite in the development shall be sold unless a corporation, association, property owners group or similar entity has been formed with the right to assess all properties individually owned or jointly owned which have any rights or interest in the use of the common areas and common facilities in the development, such assessment power to be sufficient to meet the expenses of such entity, and with authority to control, and the duty to maintain, all of said mutually available features of the development. Such entity shall operate under recorded CC&Rs, which shall include compulsory membership of all owners of lots and/or suites and flexibility of assessments to meet changing costs of maintenance, repairs, and services. Recorded CC&Rs shall permit enforcement by the City for provisions required as Conditions of Approval. The developer shall submit evidence of compliance with this requirement to, and receive approval of, the City prior to making any such sale. This condition shall not apply to land dedicated to the City for public purposes. 82. Recordation of CC&Rs. CC&Rs shall be finalized and recorded at the time of Final Map Recordation. 83. Copies of CC&Rs. Three copies of the final recorded CC&Rs shall be provided to the Planning Division. 84. General. The CC&Rs shall contain a provision requiring the HOA to perform yearly inspections of garages to ensure adequate parking. 85. General. The CC&Rs shall contain a list of all disclosures (tax rate— Mello Roos, wildlife, noise, etc.) as required by the City of Temecula and State of California. OUTSIDE AGENCY LETTERS 86. Rancho Water. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Rancho Water transmittal dated August 26, 2014, a copy of which is attached. 87. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (RCFCWD). The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the RCFCWD transmittal dated March 5, 2015, a copy of which is attached. 88. Metropolitan Water District(MWD). The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the MWD transmittal dated April 14, 2015, a copy of which is attached. 89. Army Corps of Engineers(ACOE). The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the ACOE transmittal dated May 18, 2015, a copy of which is attached. 90. Southern California Edison (SCE). The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the SCE transmittal dated September 17, 2015, a copy of which is attached. 91. Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD). The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the EMWD transmittal dated September 21, 2016, a copy of which is attached. FIRE PREVENTION General Requirements 92. Fire Flow. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or construction of all commercial and residential buildings per CFC Appendix B. The developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 2,000 GPM at 20-PSI residual operating pressure for a 2-hour duration for this projects. The fire flow as given above has taken into account all information as provided (CFC Appendix B and Temecula City Ordinance 15.16.020). 93. Fire Hydrants. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC Appendix C. Standard fire hydrants (6"x 4" x (2) 2 '/2"outlets) shall be located on fire access roads and adjacent public streets. For all multi-family projects hydrants shall be spaced at 350 feet apart, and shall be located no more than 210 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant for all and for single family dwellings and tract homes hydrants shall be 500 feet apart, and shall be located no more than 250 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. (CFC Appendix C and Temecula City Ordinance 15.16.020). 94. Fire Dept. Plan Review. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in force at the time of building plan submittal. 95. Water Maintenance Agreement. An agreement for the maintenance and repair of any and all existing underground Fire Department water systems, including all fire sprinkler supplies, and all fire hydrants and supplies, will be in place as a condition of this division to maintain available water in perpetuity Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits 96. Turning Radius (Culdesac). Maximum cul-de-sac length shall not exceed 1320 feet. Minimum outside turning radius on any cul-de-sac shall be 37-feet for single family dwelling tracts and 45 feet for multi-family dwelling tracts. (CFC Chapter 5 along with the Temecula City Ordinance 15.16.020). 97. All Weather Access Roads. Fire apparatus access roads shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus and shall be with a surface to provide all-weather driving capabilities. Access roads shall be 80,000 lbs. GVW with a minimum of AC thickness of .25 feet. In accordance with Section 3310.1, prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have fire apparatus access roads. (CFC Chapter 5 and City Ordinance 15.16.020) 98. Access Road Widths. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than 24 feet with an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 inches. (CFC Chapter 5 and Temecula City Ordinance 15.16.020). 99. Gradient Of Access Roads. The gradient for fire apparatus access roads shall not exceed 15 percent (CFC Chapter 5 and City Ordinance 15.16.020). Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy 100. Knox Box. All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates obstructing Fire Department access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry system for emergency access by firefighting personnel (CFC Chapter 5) 101. File Format Requirements. A simple plot plan and a simple floor plan, each as an electronic file of the .DWG format, must be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau. Contact Fire Prevention for approval of alternative file formats which may be acceptable PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT General Requirements 102. Unless otherwise noted, all conditions shall be completed by the Developer at no cost to any Government Agency. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the tentative site plan all existing and proposed easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage courses, and their omission will subject the project to further review and may require revision. 103. Developer shall execute a City Standard Subdivision Improvement Agreements for the applicable phase of the development to install and secure with appropriate security as provided by law, public improvements shown on the tentative map. These improvements include, but are not limited to paving, base, signing & striping, sidewalks, curbs and gutters, grading, clearing and grubbing, undergrounding or relocation of utilities, sewer, water, fire hydrants, street lights, pedestrian ramps, drainage structures, and best management practices for stormwater treatment, reconstruction, replacement and repair of adjacent improvements where the subdivision transitions and connects to existing improvements as applicable. Said improvements shall be installed to City Standards to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. 104. Prior to approval of improvement plans or final map for each phase, Developer shall meet with the Fire Marshal to determine if fire protection measures (fire flows, fire hydrant locations, building sprinklers)are required to serve the project. Fire hydrants, if proposed, shall be considered public improvements and shall be served by public water mains to the satisfaction of the Water District Engineer. 105. Prior to issuance of building permits for each phase, Developer shall underground all existing overhead utilities along and within the subdivision boundary. 106. Developer shall cause Owner to waive direct access rights on the final map for all lots abutting the Western Bypass Corridor Road. 107. Developer shall cause Owner to make an offer of dedication to the City and/or other appropriate entities for the Sewer, Water and Storm Drainage easements shown on the tentative map. The offer shall be made by a certificate on the final map. All land so offered shall be free and clear of all liens and encumbrances and without cost to the City. 108. Additional drainage easements may be required. Developer shall dedicate and provide or install drainage structures, as may be required by the Director of Public Works, prior to or concurrent with any grading or building permit. 109. All utility systems such as electric, including those which provide direct service to the project site and/or currently exist along public rights-of-ways adjacent to the site (except electrical lines rated 33 kv or greater), gas, telephone, water, sewer, and cable TV shall be placed underground, with easements provided as required, and designed and constructed in accordance with City Codes and the utility provider. 110. Prior to the issuance of any grading permit, as deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall consult with the State of California Department of Fish and Game, U.S.Army Corps of Engineers,and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to determine if permits or approvals are necessary from such agencies for any action contemplated by this proposal. Such consultation shall be in writing, and copies of said correspondence, including responses from agencies, shall be submitted to the City. Where deemed appropriate by the Director of Public Works, the terms, conditions, and recommendations of the noted agencies shall be incorporated as Conditions of Approval into the areas of development. 111. All easements and/or right-of-way dedications shall be offered for dedication to the public or other appropriate agency and shall continue in force until the City accepts or abandons such offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the Department of Public Works. 112. Landscaping and permanent irrigation facilities shall be installed with all street improvements on and off-site grading. Perimeter walls, where required, shall be treated with graffiti-resistant coating and shall be installed adjacent to street improvements within each phase. 113. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06, unless otherwise provided for by a written agreement between the City and the Developer. 114. All development within this site shall be in accordance with the requirements of all City ordinances, except as expressly modified herein or by development agreement, and State laws, and shall conform to the approved Specific Plan. Regulations or procedures not covered by the Specific Plan or appurtenant documents shall be subject to the City ordinances in effect at the time entitlement is required. 115. Approval of this Specific Plan is contingent upon and shall not become effective nor shall it vest until a General Plan Amendment (GPA) is approved by the City Council, and an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) or any other environmental review under the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) are certified by the City Council. 116. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the Developer shall provide proof to the Director from the Temecula Valley Unified School District that this project has satisfied its obligation to comply with all school district requirements. 117. The first submittal of Final Landscape and Irrigation Plans for each phase shall be pursuant to the landscape plan check process on file in the Planning Department and accompanied by the project's building, improvement, and grading plans. 118. A detailed noise attenuation evaluation shall be conducted in a supplemental acoustical study to be submitted when the tract map is filed with the appropriate agency. 119. Prior to the approval of a development plan or tentative map for individual planning areas, the developer and City staff will review plans, especially for multi-family housing areas, commercial uses, and parks for the provision of appropriate, necessary, and adequate pedestrian and bicycle facilities. 120. Prior to approval of any development projects, appropriate clearances, conditions and approvals from all agencies with jurisdiction on project review shall be obtained by the developer. These agencies shall be determined by the Director of Planning and the Director of Public Works. 121. Developer shall cause property owner to execute and submit to the Director of Public Works for recordation, the City's standard form Geologic Failure Hold Harmless Agreement. 122. The developer or the developer's successor-in-interest shall be responsible for maintaining the undeveloped portion of the site including weed abatement, litter removal and erosion control as applicable. 123. Prior to approval of any development projects, the developer shall investigate the feasibility of a reclaimed water system,to irrigate landscaping within the roadway medians, parkways, drainage channel, schools, the community park, the paseo park, neighborhood parks, and other common open space areas. The developer shall provide evidence that compliance with this condition is in accordance with Senate Bill 2095. 124. Developer shall provide to the Director of Public Works, an acceptable means, CC&Rs and/or other recorded document, for maintaining the private easements within the subdivision and all the private improvements (e.g. roads, driveways, sidewalks, utilities, water quality treatment facilities and private storm drain improvements, etc.) located therein and to distribute the costs of such maintenance in an equitable manner among the owners of the properties within the subdivision. 125. Developer shall comply with all applicable provisions of federal, state, and local laws and regulations in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 126. All lighting shall be reviewed by the City to assure compliance with the Ordinance No. 655. 127. Any signs proposed for this development shall at a minimum be designed in conformance with the City's Sign Ordinance and shall require review and approval of the Planning Director prior to installation of such signs consistent with the Specific Plan. Grading 128. No grading shall be permitted for any development area prior to tentative map approval and issuance of grading permits for the specific area of development. 129. Grading plans and operations shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City Grading Standards, the recommendations contained in the Geotechnical Report, or any subsequent reports prepared for the project, the conditions of the grading permit, and accepted grading construction practices and the recommendations and standards specified in the Specific Plan and Environmental Impact Report (EIR) document. 130. Prior to issuance of any grading permit, erosion control plans shall be prepared in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works. The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and erosion control improvements as applicable. 131. Each subsequent application for a phase of development shall include a conceptual grading plan to indicate at a minimum: a) Preliminary quantity estimates for grading. b) Techniques and methods which will be used to prevent erosion and sedimentation during and after the grading process in compliance with the City Standards and NPDES requirements. c) Preliminary pad and roadway elevations. d) Designation of the borrow or stockpile site location for import/export material. e) Approximate time frames for development including the identification of areas which will be graded during the rainy months. f) Hydrology and hydraulic concerns and mitigations. 132. Major grading activities shall be scheduled during the dry season wherever possible, or as otherwise approved by the Department of Public Works. 133. Soils stabilization, which may include revegetation of graded areas, shall occur within 30 days of completion of grading activities as directed by the Department of Public Works. 134. The site shall be watered during grading operations to control dust. 135. Temporary drainage and sediment control devices shall be installed as directed by the Department of Public Works. 136. An import/export route shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works prior to issuance of any grading permit. The plan shall include limitation to the duration of the grading operation and construction activities, a Traffic Control Plan, and a daily time schedule of operations. 137. Prior to issuance of any grading permit, a soils reports shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval, to address engineering, geologic, seismic, and soils engineering concerns for each tentative map or commercial parcel map for each phase of proposed development. 138. A Geotechnical Report shall be prepared by a registered engineer or engineering geologist and submitted to the Department of public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address special study zones and identify any geotechnical hazards for the site including location of faults and potential for liquefaction. The report shall include recommendations to mitigate the impact of ground shaking and liquefaction. 139. All public streets shall be maintained and cleaned if necessary on a daily basis during grading operation and construction activities. Cash deposit, letter of credit or posting of bond to guarantee maintenance of all public rights-of-way affected by the grading operations and construction activities, shall be posted prior to issuance of grading permits. 140. If subsequent Geotechnical and Soils Reports determine that dewatering of the site is necessary during construction, necessary permits (ie. in compliance with NPDES permit) shall be obtained from appropriate agencies prior to approval of the grading plans. Drainage 141. flood plain/Floodwav Development. If applicable, the developer shall comply with the provisions of Title 15, Chapter 15.12 of the Temecula Municipal Code, which requires a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) from FEMA. A FEMA-approved CLOMR shall be submitted to Public Works for review and approval. The developer shall pay all fees required by FEMA(and City) for processing of the FEMA reviews. 142. Drainage Study. A drainage study shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer and submitted to Public Works with the initial grading plan check in accordance with City, Riverside County and engineering standards. The study shall identify storm water runoff quantities (to mitigate the 100-year storm event) from the development of this site and upstream of the site as required by the City. It shall identify all existing or proposed offsite or onsite, public or private, drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. Runoff shall be conveyed to an adequate outfall capable of receiving the storm water runoff without damage to public or private property. The study shall include a capacity analysis verifying the adequacy of all facilities. Any upgrading or upsizing of drainage facilities necessary to convey the storm water runoff shall be provided as part of development of this project. 143. Drainage and flood control facilities shall be provided in accordance with the requirements of the City and/or Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (RCFC&WCD). 144. Prior to approval of any subsequent development applications, the Developer shall submit the master drainage plan to the City and RCFC&WCD to review the adequacy of the proposed and existing downstream drainage facilities. 145. Drainage facilities within each phase shall be constructed immediately after the completion of the site grading and prior to or concurrently with the initial site development within that phase. 146. All drainage facilities shall be designed to convey 100-year storm flows, subject to the approval of the Department of Public Works and RCFC&WCD, as applicable. 147. The Developer shall construct the proposed on and offsite drainage facility improvements and the interim detention basin provision as recommended in the Specific Plan and Drainage Study documents and/or as directed by the Department of Public Works and RCFC&WCD, as applicable. 148. As required by the Department of Public Works, additional Hydrology and Hydraulic Reports shall be submitted with subsequent tentative maps and/or development applications to study the drainage impacts and analyze necessary measures to mitigate the runoff created as part of the development of this project. 149. The Developer shall accept and properly dispose of all off-site drainage flowing onto or through the site as required by the Director of Public works. 150. The Developer shall protect downstream properties from damages caused by alteration of the drainage patterns; i.e., concentration or diversion of flow. Protection shall be provided by constructing adequate drainage facilities, including enlarging existing facilities or by securing drainage easements as necessary. 151. During review of any future tentative map, an updated geotechnical/geologic report shall be prepared to include any necessary revisions to earthwork, foundation, design, and construction recommendations. 152. Soils Report. A soils report, prepared by a registered soil or civil engineer, shall be submitted to Public Works with the initial grading plan submittal. The report shall address the site's soil conditions and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered structures and preliminary pavement sections. 153. Geological Report. The developer shall complete any outstanding County geologist's requirements, recommendations and/or proposed Conditions of Approval as identified during entitlement. 154. Letter of Permission/Easement. The developer shall obtain documents (letters of permission or easements) for any offsite work performed on adjoining properties. The document's format is as directed by, and shall be submitted to, Public Works for acceptance. The document information shall be noted on the approved grading plan. WQMP/SWPPP 155. Required Clearances. As deemed necessary by Public Works,the developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: a. San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board; b. Army Corps of Engineers; c. California Department of Fish and Wildlife; d. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District; or other affected agencies 156. Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP). The developer shall submit a final WQMP (prepared by a registered professional engineer)with the initial grading plan submittal for any phase approval by Public Works. A copy of the final project-specific WQMP must be kept onsite at all times. Refer to the WQMP template and agreement link below: http://www.cityoftemecula.org/Temecula/Government/PublicWorksMOMPandNPDES/W QMP.htm 157. Erosion & Sediment Control Plan. The developer shall submit a grading/erosion & sediment control plan(s)to be reviewed and approved by Public Works. All plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site. The approved plan shall include all final WQMP water quality facilities and all construction-phase pollution-prevention controls to adequately address non-permitted runoff. Refer to the City's Engineering & Construction Manual at: http://www.citvoftemecula.org/Temecula/Government/PublicWorks/engineeringconstman ual.htm 158. O & M Agreement: The developer shall submit a completed WQMP Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Agreement for review and approval 159. Erosion &Sediment Control Securities. The developer shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 24, Section 18.24.140 of the Temecula Municipal Code by posting security and entering into an agreement to guarantee the erosion & sediment control improvements. 160. NPDES General Permit Compliance. The developer shall obtain project coverage under the State National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit for Construction Activities and shall provide the following: a. A copy of the Waste Discharge Identification number(WDID) issued by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB); b. The project's Risk Level (RL) determination number; and C. The name, contact information and certification number of the Qualified SWPPP Developer(QSD). Pursuant to the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) requirements and City's storm water ordinance, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be generated and submitted to the Board. Throughout the project duration, the SWPPP shall be routinely updated and readily available (onsite)to the State and City. Review www.cabmr)handbooks.com for SWPPP guidelines. Refer to the following link: http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/water issues/programs/stormwater/construction.shtml Circulation 161. Prior to Final Map recordation for each phase, the Developer is responsible to bond for or construct the traffic signals at the project's accesses, as required, including the associated street improvements, based on traffic signal warrants analysis relative to subsequent tentative maps and/or development applications. 162. Adequate primary and secondary access shall be provided for each phase of development as approved by the Department of Public Works. Access to and from developments areas shall be reviewed by the Department of Public Works at the time of submittal of individual tentative maps and/or development applications. Additional rights-of-way at entries to the aforementioned sites may be required to provide for turning lanes as directed by the Department of Public Works, consistent with the Specific Plan and the Tentative Tract Map. 163. The exact location and number of access points shall be subject to review and approval by the Department of Public Works upon future tentative map and/or development plan approvals consistent with the Specific Plan and the Tentative Tract Map. 164. All street sections shall correspond with Typical Roadway Cross Sections and requirements of the Circulation Element of City's General Plan, City ordinances and standards or as approved with the Specific Plan and the Tentative Map. 165. All intersection intervals shall comply with City standards and requirements. 166. Developer, at its sole cost, shall design and improve Vincent Moraga Road to ensure that all driveways providing access from to adjoining properties shall be allowed for safe ingress and/or egress. Improvements may include, but not be limited to, truck deceleration, acceleration and turn-in lanes. The improvements shall conform to the standards adopted by the City of Temecula for public roadway and rights of way consistent with the Specific Plan and the Tentative Tract Map. 167. Developer, at its sole cost, shall fund the acquisition and installation of traffic signals and related roadway and right of way improvements, when warranted. The design and installation shall conform to the standards adopted by the City of Temecula, consistent with the Specific Plan and the Tentative Tract Map. 168. Developer shall install sight distance corridors at all street intersections and driveways in accordance with City Engineering Standards. The limits of these sight distance corridors shall be reflected on all improvement, grading, or landscape plans prepared in association with the development. No structure, fence, wall, tree, shrub, sign, or other object may be placed or permitted to encroach within the area identified as a sight distance corridor as defined by City of Temecula Engineering Standards. 169. The Developer shall provide bus bays and shelters within the Specific Plan. Location and number of bus bays shall be subject to approval of the City and Riverside Transportation Agency (RTA). Additional rights-of-way dedications associated with bus bays shall be provided by the Developer. 170. Developer shall provide the design of all private streets and drainage systems to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. The structural section of all private streets shall conform to City of Temecula Standards based on R-value tests. All private streets and drainage systems shall be inspected by the City. 171. Necessary improvements have been/will be conditioned based on the project traffic studies and the conceptual phasing plan shown in the Altair Specific Plan.Any substantive re-phasing of the development must be approved by the Planning and Public Works Director through a re-phasing application. Prior to the issuance of occupancy permits within any phase, all on and offsite improvements as referred to in the Traffic Reports and subsequent addenda along with additional requirements set herein,or as set by conditions on individual tracts, must be constructed and/or bonded as required by the Department of Public Works. 172. Ensuing Traffic Reports, analyzing traffic impacts associated with subsequent development stages of the Specific Plan, shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works to identify implementation and timing of the necessary improvements to mitigate cumulative traffic impacts. Traffic Mitigation Monitoring Program 173. The Traffic Mitigation Monitoring Program shall be established in compliance with the approved mitigation measures identified in the approved Traffic Impact Analysis and shall be completed prior to issuance of first occupancy permit in each additional phases of the development as required by the Director of Public Works. Water and Sewer 174. Water and sewer facilities shall be installed in accordance with the requirements and specifications of the City, Rancho California Water District (RCWD), and Eastern Municipal Water District(EMWD). Such requirements shall be applicable thru completion of this development. 175. Prior to the approval of final engineering for each phase as subsequent development applications,the Developer shall obtain written approval for the water system from RCWD. 176. Prior to the approval of final engineering for each phase subsequent development applications, the Developer shall obtain written approval for the sewer system from EMWD. 177. The Developer shall install potable water services and meters at locations approved by the Water District Engineer. The locations of said services shall be reflected on public improvement plans. 178. The Developer shall install sewer laterals and clean-outs at locations approved by the Sewer District Engineer. The locations of sewer laterals shall be reflected on public improvement plans. Final Map Notes 179. Add the following notes to the final map as non-mapping data: "All improvements within private Streets are privately owned and are to be privately maintained with including but not limited to: Curbs, gutter, A.C. paving, street lights, storm drains. All Storm Water treatment control facilities are considered private requiring private maintenance." Master HOA 180. Developer shall establish a Master homeowner's association and corresponding covenants, conditions and restrictions (CC&Rs). Said CC&Rs shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Director prior to final map approval. Prior to issuance of a building permit for a phase, the Developer shall provide the Planning Department with a recorded copy of the official CC&Rs that have been approved by the Department of Real Estate and the Planning Director. At a minimum, the CC&Rs shall contain the following provisions: d. General Enforcement by the City. The City shall have the right, but not the obligation, to enforce those Protective Covenants set forth in this Declaration in favor of, or in which the City has an interest. e. Notice and Amendment. A copy of any proposed amendment shall be provided to the City in advance. If the proposed amendment affects the City, City shall have the right to reasonably disapprove. A copy of the final approved amendment shall be transmitted to City within 30 days for the official record. f. Failure of Association to Maintain Common Area Lots and Easements. In the event that the Association fails to maintain the "Common Area Lots and/or the Association's Easements," the City shall have the right, but not the duty, to perform the necessary maintenance. If the City elects to perform such maintenance, the City shall give written notice to the Association, with a copy thereof to the Owners in the Project, setting forth with particularity the maintenance which the City finds to be required and requesting the same be carried out by the Association within a period of thirty(30) days from the giving of such notice. In the event that the Association fails to carry out such maintenance of the Common Area Lots and/or Association's Easements within the period specified by the City's notice, the City shall be entitled to cause such work to be completed and shall be entitled to reimbursement with respect thereto from the Owners as provided herein. g. Special Assessments Levied by the City. In the event the City has performed the necessary maintenance to either Common Area Lots and/or Association's Easements, the City shall submit a written invoice to the Association for all costs incurred by the City to perform such maintenance of the Common Area Lots and or Association's Easements. The City shall provide a copy of such invoice to each Owner in the Project, together with a statement that if the Association fails to pay such invoice in full within the time specified, the City will pursue collection against the Owners in the Project pursuant to the provisions of this Section. Said invoice shall be due and payable by the Association within twenty (20) days of receipt by the Association. If the Association shall fail to pay such invoice in full within the period specified, payment shall be deemed delinquent and shall be subject to a late charge in an amount equal to six percent(6%) of the amount of the invoice. Thereafter the City may pursue collection from the Association by means of any remedies available at law or in equity. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, in addition to all other rights and remedies available to the City, the City may levy a special assessment against the Owners of each Lot in the Project for an equal pro rata share of the invoice, plus the late charge. Such special assessment shall constitute a charge on the land and shall be a continuing lien upon each Lot against which the special assessment is levied. Each Owner in the Project hereby vests the City with the right and power to levy such special assessment, to impose a lien upon their respective Lot and to bring all legal actions and/or to pursue lien foreclosure procedures against any Owner and his/her respective Lot for purposes of collecting such special assessment in accordance with the procedures set forth in Article of this Declaration. h. Landscape Maintenance Responsibilities. The HOAs and individual lot or unit owner landscape maintenance responsibilities shall be as set forth on the "Developer Responsibility Map" of the Specific Plan. i. Lighting Restrictions on Private Residential Lots: Restrictions on lighting within residential lots adjacent to open space conservation areas shall be as set forth in the Specific Plan and Final EIR. Prior to the Issuance of Grading Permits 181. Required Clearances. As deemed necessary by the Director of Public Works, the developer shall receive written clearance when applicable, from the following agencies: a. San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board; b. Army Corps of Engineers; C. California Department of Fish and Wildlife; d. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District; e. Riverside County Health Department; f. City of Temecula Fire Prevention Bureau; g. Planning Department; h. Department of Public Works; i. Community Services District; j. Caltrans; k. Rancho California Water District; I. Eastern Municipal Water District; m. Verizon; n. Telephone Company; o. Southern California Edison Company; p. The Gas Company; and q. Metropolitan Water District or other affected agencies 182. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that ordinance or by providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid or fee credits have been provided. 183. Securities. For each of the phases, the developer shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 24, Section 18.24.140 of the Temecula Municipal Code by posting security and entering into an agreement to guarantee the grading and erosion & sediment control improvements. 184. Area Drainage Plan (ADP) Fee to RCFC&WCD. For each phase, the developer shall demonstrate to the City that the flood mitigation charge (ADP fee) has been paid to RCFC&WCD. If the full ADP fee has already been credited to this property, no new charge will be required. 185. The developer shall provide proof to the Department of Public Works and Planning that the conditions of any Wildlife Agency or Army Corps permits if necessary for any restoration have been bonded for and shall be implemented consistent with the timing requirements of the permits. 186. Approval of this request shall not excuse compliance with all applicable sections of the Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable City ordinances in effect at time of building permit issuance, except as otherwise specifically provided in Altair Specific Plan and the Development Agreement. 187. The project shall comply with the latest disabled access requirements pursuant to Title 24 of the California Building Code. 188. Based upon a review of the proposed grading and the grading quantities shown on the tentative map, a grading permit for each phase of this project is required. Developer shall apply for and obtain a grading permit from the Director of Public Works. 189. This project requires off site grading. No grading for any improvements shall occur outside the limits of this approval unless Developer obtains, records, and submits a recorded copy to the Director of Public Works a grading or slope easement or agreement from the owners of the affected properties. If Developer is unable to obtain the grading or slope easement, or agreement, no grading permit will be issued. In that case Developer must either apply for and obtain an amendment of this approval or modify the plans so grading will not occur outside the project and apply for and obtain a finding of substantial conformance from both the Director of Public Works and Planning Director. 190. Encroachment Permits. Prior to commencement of any applicable construction, encroachment permit(s)are required; and shall be obtained: a. from Public Works for public offsite improvements; b. from the California Department of Transportation if encroaching within their right- of-way; and c. from Riverside County Flood Control&Water Conservation District(RCFC&WCD) if encroaching within their right-of-way. 191. Prior to hauling dirt or construction materials to or from any proposed construction site within this project, Developer shall apply for and obtain approval from, the Director of Public Works for the proposed haul route. 192. Upon completion of grading, Developer shall file an "as-graded" geologic plan with the Director of Public Works. The plan shall clearly show all the geology as exposed by the grading operation, all geologic corrective measures as actually constructed and must be based on a contour map which represents both the pre and post site grading. The plan shall be signed by both the soils engineer and the engineering geologist, and shall be submitted on a 24"x 36" mylar or similar drafting film format suitable for a permanent record. Prior to the Issuance of Building Permits 193. Final Map. Final Map shall be approved and recorded for the applicable phase. 194. The developer shall provide proof to the Director of Public Works that the has contributed its fair share towards regional traffic improvements systems (i.e., traffic impact fees) for the area the area through a Development Agreement. This shall include efforts to synchronize traffic lights on streets impacted by development of each phase. 195. Building permits will not be issued for this project unless the local agency providing water and sewer services to the project provides written certification to the City that adequate water service and sewer facilities, respectively, are available to the project at the time of the application for the building permit, and that water and sewer capacity and facilities will continue to be available until the time of occupancy. Phasing 196. Construction of the development permitted by the Specific Plan, including recordation of final subdivision maps, may be carried out in stages provided that, adequate vehicular access is constructed for all dwelling units in each stage of development and further provided that such development conforms substantially with the intent and purpose of the Specific Plan Phasing Plan. 197. Development applications shall be submitted for each planning unit in each phase. Total acreage and land uses within each phase shall be substantially in accordance with the specifications of the Specific Plan. 198. The Developer shall be permitted to seek a reimbursement agreement for qualifying facilities and improvements. The City and the Developer shall proceed in good faith to allocate appropriate reimbursements to the Developer pursuant to the City's then enforceable ordinance applicable to such reimbursement pursuant to Development Agreement. Tract Map 36959-1 (North Phase) In addition to the above noted Conditions, the following improvements shall be completed as part of North Phase and prior to 1 I building permit in North Phase: 199. Acquisition of right-of-way on the east side of Vincent Moraga between Felix Valdez and Rancho California Road and construction of the designed Western Bypass Corridor northbound right turn lane improvements within this road segment. 200. Acquisition of right-of-way on the south side of Rancho California Road between Vincent Moraga Drive and the Murrieta Creek Bridge and construction of all intersection improvements within this road segment including an additional westbound left turn lane on Rancho California Road to Vincent Moraga Drive. 201. Traffic signal and utility relocation where needed and construction of the ultimate build-out of the Rancho California Road, Diaz Road and Vincent Moraga Drive intersection. 202. Construction of the designed onsite Western Bypass Corridor Phase 1 improvements from the project's northern property line to the future Altair Vista intersection. 203. Construction of the Ridge Park Drive and Western Bypass Corridor intersection improvements to provide left-turn ingress and right-in/right-out to Ridge Park Drive. Developer shall construct one hundred percent (100%) of this Fair Share traffic improvement. 204. Install Multi-Way Stop Controls at the First Street & Pujol Street intersection. Developer shall construct one hundred percent (100%) of this Fair Share traffic improvement. 205. The following improvements shall be constructed as part of the North Phase and completed prior to the earlier of, i) the 350th building permit in North Phase, or ii) the 1 It building permit in the Central Phase: 206. Acquisition of right-of-way on the west side of Vincent Moraga Drive between Felix Valdez and Rancho California Road and construction of the designed Western Bypass Corridor improvements within this road segment. 207. Acquisition of right-of-way on the east side and west side of Vincent Moraga Drive between Felix Valdez and Ridge Park Drive and construction of the designed Western Bypass Corridor improvements within this road segment. 208. Following the occupancy of both villages within this North Phase (Village A and Village B), optimize Adaptive Traffic Signal Program at: (a) Intersection of Old Town Front Street and Rancho California Road; (b) Intersection of Ynez Road and Rancho California Road; (c) including the collection of intersection traffic count data at affected intersections. Tract Map 36959-2 (Central Phase) In addition to the above noted Conditions, the following improvements shall be completed as part of Central Phase and prior to 1 st building permit in Central Phase: 209. Construction of the designed Coromell Trail road segment between Altair Vista and First Street. 210. Installation of one(1) new left turn lane(re-stripe only), and modify signal operation, install signal indications and necessary equipment at Ynez Road and Santiago Road. 211. Construction of traffic signals at the Pujol Street and First Street intersection. Developer shall construct one hundred percent (100%) of this Fair Share traffic improvement. 212. The following improvements shall be constructed as part of the Central Phase and completed prior to the issuance of any building permits on pads south of the Village C Park: a. Construction of the "A" Street vehicular bridge that crosses over the Village C Park. 213. The following improvements shall be constructed as part of the Central Phase, shall commence before the 700th building permit is issued in the project and completed prior to the earlier of, i) the 950th building permit in the project, or ii) the 1St building permit in the South Phase: a. Construction of either the Western Bypass Bridge or construction of the Western Bypass Corridor Phase 2 improvements (two (2) eastern lanes; ultimate northbound) including parallel Class 1 bikeway. If requested by Developer, City will allow for stockpiling of dirt on either Village G or the Nature Center Parcel prior to grading permit issuance for the Civic Phase. 214. Following the construction of the Western Bypass Bridge and Phase 2 Road, optimize Adaptive Traffic Signal Program at: (a) Intersection of 1-15 northbound onramp and Temecula Parkway; (b) Intersection of Temecula Parkway and Margarita Road; (c) Intersection of Ynez Road and Santiago Road; (d) including the collection of intersection traffic count data at these affected intersections. Tract Map 36959-3 (South Phase) 215. In addition to the above noted Conditions, the following improvements shall be completed as part of South Phase and prior to 1 st building permit in South Phase: a. Construction of both the Western Bypass Bridge and construction of the Western Bypass Corridor Phase 2 improvements (two (2) eastern lanes; ultimate northbound) including parallel Class 1 bikeway. If requested by Developer, City will allow for stockpiling of dirt on either Village G or the Nature Center Parcel prior to grading permit issuance for the Nature Center Phase. b. Construction of traffic signal improvements at the Western Bypass Corridor and Altair Vista intersection. C. Construction of the designed "B" Street North road segment between Altair Vista and the Western Bypass Corridor. 216. Following the completion of the villages in this South Phase (Village D, Village E and Village F), optimize Adaptive Traffic Signal Program at: (a) Intersection of 1-15 northbound onramp and Temecula Parkway; (b) Intersection of Temecula Parkway and Margarita Road; (c) Intersection of Ynez Road and Santiago Road; (d) including the collection of intersection traffic count data at these affected intersections. Tract Map 36959 (Civic Phase) 217. In addition to the above noted Conditions, the following improvements shall be completed as part of Civic Phase and prior to 1 It building permit in Civic Phase: a. Construction of all remaining Western Bypass Corridor improvements (Phase 3 which includes 2 western lanes; southbound). b. Construction of traffic signal improvements at the Western Bypass and "B" Street intersection. 218. Following completion of both villages in this Civic Phase(Village G and Nature Center), optimize Adaptive Traffic Signal Program at: (a) Intersection of Old Town Front Street and Rancho California Road. (b) Intersection of Ynez Road and Rancho California Road; (c) Intersection of 1-15 northbound onramp and Temecula Parkway; (d) Intersection of Temecula Parkway and Margarita Road; (e) Intersection of Ynez Road and Santiago Road; (f) including the collection of intersection traffic count data at these affected intersections. TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT General Requirements 219. If any of the following conditions of approval differ from the Specific Plan text or exhibits, the conditions enumerated herein shall take precedent. 220. The current park dedication requirement (Quimby) shall be satisfied with the 5 acre community park, the proposed private Parks that are HOA owned and maintained including recreational areas identified in the Altair Specific Plan. 221. The actual design of the 5 acre community park in Central Phase shall be in substantial conformance with the conceptual designs and guidelines identified within the Specific Plan. Prior to submittal of construction plans, the developer shall meet with the Director of Community Services to determine the location and specifications of the park amenities to be provided on site. Construction plans and specifications must be approved by the Director of Community Services. 222. All park plans submitted for consideration shall be in conformance with the City of Temecula Landscape and Irrigation Specifications and Installation Details and the Park Land and Landscape Dedication Process. 223. The design of the community park in Central Phase shall provide for pedestrian circulation and access for the disabled throughout the park. 224. The developer, the developer's successor or assignee, or Master HOA shall be responsible for all maintenance of the park sites and slopes/landscaping areas except as defined in the Development Agreement, on Developer Responsibility Map. 225. The 5 acre community park shall be improved and dedicated to the City free and clear of any liens, assessment fees, or easements that would preclude the City from utilizing the property for public purposes. A policy of title insurance and a soils assessment report shall also be provided with the conveyance of the property. 226. The developer may receive a credit against the park component of the City's Development Impact Fee (DIF) based upon the actual cost of improving the community park in Central Phase. The fee/credit issue shall be addressed pursuant to the execution of a Development Agreement or a Park Improvement Agreement between the applicant and the City prior to approval of the final map. August 26, 2014 i r Matthew Peters Project Planner City of Temecula Post Office Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 SUBJECT: WATER AVAILABILITY ALTAIR SPECIFIC PLAN, PA14-0159 APN 922-210-049; APN 940-310-013; APN 940-310-015; APN 940-310-016; APN 940-310-044; APN 940-310-045; k a .,�:, APN 940-310-046; APN 940-310-047; APN 940-310-048; APN 940-320-001; APN 940-320-002; APN 940-320-003; p,,,,,,,,,,.,. APN 940-320-004; APN 940-320-005; APN 940-320-006; AND APN 940-320-007 I [AMBIENT COMMUNITIES] i Dear Mr. Peters: Please be advised that the above-referenced project/property is located within the service boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD/District). Existing water service is provided to portions of the subject project/property under District Account No. 01-06-95321-0 for APNs 940-310-045, 940-310-046, t 940-310-047, and 940-310-048. Additions or modifications to water service arrangements are subject to the Rules and Regulations (governing) Water System Facilities and Service, as well as the completion of financial arrangements j s between RCWD and the property owner. Water service to individual lots will require the extension of water facilities within dedicated public and/or private right-of-ways. Individual water meters will be required for each lot and/or project unit, including separate water meters for landscape irrigation, as applicable. Section 9.4 of the Altair Specific Plan should state that utility placement of District utilities for both water and recycled water systems (including related advanced metering infrastructure antenna) is required to comply with RCWD standards and requirements for proper District operations. j North of the subject project/property fronts an existing 12-inch diameter water pipeline (1305 Pressure Zone) within Ridge Park Drive. East of the subject project/property fronts an existing 8-inch diameter water pipeline (1305 Pressure Zone) within 6"' Street. East of the subject project/property also fronts existing 22-inch diameter and 36-inch diameter water pipelines (both 1305 Pressure Zone) at the intersection of Calle Cerrillo and Pujol Street. Existing 30-inch diameter and 42-inch diameter water pipelines (both 1305 Pressure Zone) bisect the property at APN 922-210-049 and continue to Pujol Street. Section 6.2.1 of the Altair Specific Plan should be corrected to reference service from the 1305 Pressure Zone, as well as the 22-inch and 36-inch diameter parallel water pipelines within Pujol Street. i ------------ -----—-- c Letter to Matthew Peters/Cite of Temecula August 26,2014 Page 2 i I An existing 24-inch diameter recycled water pipeline (1381 Pressure Zone) exists east of the subject project/property within 6"' Street, which continues along Pujol Street with a 20-inch diameter recycled water pipeline (1381 Pressure Zone). An existing 20-inch diameter recycled water pipeline exists east of the subject project/property within Temecula Parkway (1381 Pressure Zone), Section 6.2.1 of the Altair Speck Plan should be corrected to reference service from the Rancho California Water District via the 1381 Pressure Zone. Water availability is contingent upon the property owner(s) signing an Agency Agreement that assigns water management rights, if any, to RCWD. In addition, water availability is contingent upon the timing of the subject project/property development relative to water supply shortage contingency measures (pursuant to RCWD's Water Shortage Contingency Plan or other applicable ordinances), and/or the adoption of a required Water Supply Assessment for the development,as determined by the Lead Agency. i In accordance with Resolution 2007-10-5, the project/property will be required to use recycled water for all landscape irrigation. Recycled water service, therefore, would be available upon construction of any required on-site and/or off-site recycled water facilities and the completion of financial arranaements between RCWD and the property owner. Requirements for the use of recycled water are available from RCWD. Section 8.5 of the Altair Specific Plan should indicate that the landscape palette should conform to the State's Model Landscape Ordinance, and that the landscaping shall be compatible with recycled water use. Section 5.1.2 of the Altair Specific Plain should indicate that recycled water will be utilized for all grading activities. As soon as feasible, and prior to the preparation of California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) documents, the project proponent should contact RCWD for a determination of existing water and recycled water system capability, based upon project-specific demands and fire flow I requirements. The project proponent shall provide project area layouts, with roadways, to determine required connections and pipeline sizing. District review will consider necessary system looping of water and recycled water systems, considering the project phasing and other capital improvements identified within Section 11.2 of the Altair Specific Plan. The District will also require fire flow and estimated daily demands for hydraulic review for troth systems. The project proponent should contact RCWD for an assessment of project-specific deposits for plan review, fees, and other requirements. Sewer service to the subject project/property would he provided by Eastern Municipal Water District. i I i i i I4\CSim037\F4501FEG 6nrho California kVate, Ui,trirt _ ti'. .t Fc ad I a r1tf,t,. ,.4V'-_._ i .,iL.f, .. .. .,_ u.. _frt ,. ) F.L'•..` ,i :u GSra;i Letter to Matthew Peters/City of Temecula August 26,2014 Page 3 I i ( If' you should have any questions or need additional information, please contact an Engineering Services Representative at the District office at (95 1) 1-96-6900. i Sincerely, RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT Corry Smtth j Engineering Services Supervisor i i cc: Corey Wallace.Enginecrin!Manager-Design Warren Back, Engineering Mana,e--Plannins j Heath McMahon,Construction Contracts Manager Jeff'Kirshbers. Principal Engineer Ambient Communities I i I I f i i I � i C i i 1 � Rancho C.FCo nia W,wt District __ .. r G,. I )ff:... x.901"•T, v .:L,.L .,ri_ 2 J WARREN D.WILLIAMS 1995 MARKET STREET General Manager-Chief Engineer RIVERSIDE,CA 92501 951.955.1200 FAX 951.788.9965 www.rcflood.org 168587 RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT City of Temecula Planning Department Post Office Box 9033 ����� Temecula,California 92589-9033 9 9 2015 Attention: Matt Peters Ladies and Gentlemen: Re: Tract 30129 and PA 14-0160 The District does not normally recommend conditions for land divisions or other land use cases in incorporated cities. The District also does not plan clieck city land use cases, or provide State Division of Real Estate letters or other flood hazard reports for such cases. District comments/recommendations for such cases are normally limited to items of specific interest to the District including District Master Drainage Plan facilities, other regional flood control and drainage facilities which could be considered a logical component or extension of a master plan system, and District Area Drainage Plan fees (development mitigation lees). In addition,information of a general nature is provided. The District has not reviewed the proposed project in detail and the following checked comments do not in any way constitute or imply District approval or endorsement of the proposed project with respect to flood hazard,public health and safety or any other such issue: No comment. This project would not be impacted by District Master Drainage Plan facilities nor are other facilities of regional interest proposed. This project involves District Master Plan facilities. The District will accept ownership of such facilities on written request of the City. Facilities must be constructed to District standards, and District plan check and inspection will be required for District acceptance. Plan check,inspection and administrative fees will be required. X This project may involve,storm drains 36 inches or larger in diameter or other facilities that could be considered regional in nature. The District would consider accepting ownership of such facilities on written request of the City. Facilities must be constructed to District standards,and District plan check and inspection will be required for District acceptance. Plan check,inspection and administrative fees will be required. X This project is located within the limits of the District's Murrieta Creek/Temecula Valley Area Drainage Plan for which drainage fees have been adopted;applicable fees should be paid by cashier's check or money order only to the Flood Control District or City prior to issuance of grading permits. Fees to be paid should be at the rate in effect at the time of issuance of the actual permit. An encroachment permit shall be obtained for any construction related activities occurring within District right of way or facilities. For further information,contact the District's encroachment permit section at 951.955.1266. GENERAL INFORMATION This project may require a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Clearance for grading,recordation or other final approval should not be given until the City has determined that the project has been granted a permit or is shown to be exempt. If this project involves a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) mapped flood plain, then the City should require the applicant to provide all studies,calculations,plans and other information required to meet FEMA requirements, and should further require that the applicant obtain a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) prior to grading, recordation or other final approval of the project,and a Letter of Map Revision(LOMR)prior to occupancy. If a natural watercourse or mapped flood plain is impacted by this pro'ect,the City should require the applicant to obtain a Section 1602 Agreement from the California Department of Fish ani Game and a Clean Water Act Section 404 Permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, or written correspondence from these agencies indicating the proJ'ect is exempt from these requirements. A Clean Water Act Section 401 Water Quality Certification may be required from the local California Regional Water Quality Control Board prior to issuance of the Corps 404 permit. Very/truly yours, t(N eering Project Manager c: Riverside County Planning Department Date: March 5,2015 Attn: Kristi Lovelady SKM:blm AQ©���n►a waip*A'� r THE METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA Office of the General Manager Your Case No. PA 14-0160 MWD San Diego Pipelines Nos. 4 and 5 Sta. 1587+00 to 1604+00 R/W Parcels 142-4-1 (Fee) Substr. Job No. 4046-15-001 April 14, 2015 Mr. Matt Peters City of Temecula Planning Department 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 Dear Mr. Peters: Tentative Tract No. 30129 Thank you for your transmittal letter dated February 19, 2015, submitting prints of the Tentative Tract Map No. 30129 (Sheets 1 through 6 of 6) and conceptual grading plans (Sheets 1 through 12 of 12) for the proposed development located in the vicinity of Pujol Street and Murrieta Creek, in the city of Temecula. Please note that we have granted the City of Temecula's proposed future Highway 79 extension"Western Bypass" bridge and widening the west side of"Pujol Street". Enclosed is a copy of the Metropolitan's road and utility easement dedication to the City of Temecula, Instrument No. 2013-0183349 recorded on April 18, 2013, Official Records of Riverside County. However, this tract development is introducing a private "Altair Vista"road and realigning"Pujol Street" which does not match the City's recently granted easement. Please clarify how this development fits in with-the City's master improvement plans. 700 N.Alameda Street,Los Angeles,California 90012•Mailing Address:Box 54153,Los Angeles,California 90054-0153•Telephone(213)217-6000 Mr. Matt Peters Page 2 April 14, 2015 We have reviewed the submitted plans and our comments and requirements are as follows: I. The locations of Metropolitan's 97-inch-inside-diameter San Diego Pipeline No. 5, accompanying varied width fee right-of-way and portions of our 20-foot-wide road easement, as shown on Sheets 8 and 9 of 12 of the conceptual grading plans and on Sheets 5 and 6 of 6 of the Tentative "Tract Map No. 30129, appears to be in general agreement with our records. However, please note that our San Diego Pipeline No. 4 transitions from a 99-inch-inside-diameter prestressed concrete pipeline into a 89- inch-inside-diameter welded steel pipeline located approximately on the east edge of the existing Pujol Street. In addition, we request that our Service Connection WR-34 facilities and accompanying fee right-of-way also be shown and identified as Metro- politan's on all pertinent sheets of the plans, Enclosed for your information and use are prints our Drawings B-50431, B-50454, B-56204, 13-56205, B-66612, B-66613 and B-48578 and Right-of-Way Map 142-4-1 (Sheet 4 of 6). Metropolitan has no records for the extension of`Pujol Road' located just south of the future"Western Bypass" bridge, as shown on Sheet 8 of 12 of the conceptual grading plans. Please submit evidence to indicate that 'Pujol Road' is a dedicated public street at this location, otherwise. this road should not be reflected on the plans. 2. Since ingress/egress and utility rights across our property were reserved per the grant deed for our fee right-of-way (Instrument No. 109720, recorded on December 13, 1967, Official Records of Riverside County), Metropolitan has no general objections to granting public road and utility easement to the City of Temecula. Therefore, the concept of the proposed location of the "Camino Estribo" road across our property, as shown on Sheet 8 of 12 of the conceptual grading plans and on Sheet 5 of your 6 of your Tentative Tract Map No. 30129, is acceptable to Metropolitan. Please note that granting of the "Camino Estribo" road easement will serve as Metropolitan's obligat- ion for the reserved ingress/egress and utility rights in this area on our original grant deed. Metropolitan will subsequently process a quitclaim deed for this obligation in exchange for the "Camino Estribo" public road and utility easement, as this develop- ment moves forward. Appropriate right must be obtained from Metropolitan for the proposed `E Street' public road and utility crossing portion of Metropolitan's property. Please contact Jeffrey Wynn of our Real Property Development and Management Unit, telephone (213) 217-7659, regarding the requirements and procedures for obtaining temporary Mr. Matt Peters Page 3 April 14, 2015 and/or permanent easement documentations prior to any construction including potholing and exploratory borings within our fee right-of-way. The proposed grading for any proposed roads should not result into a retention basin within the limits of our fee property. Please revise the plans accordingly. 3. The proposed grade for the vertical alignment of the `Camino Estribo' and `E Street' roads crossing over our San Diego Pipeline Nos. 4 and 5 within our fee right-of-way, as shown on Sheets 8 and 9 of 12 of the conceptual grading plans, are unacceptable to Metropolitan. The proposal indicates the placement of substantial fill that would exceed the 10-feet-maximurn allowable cover for our San Diego Pipeline No. 4; 11-feet-maximum allowable cover between Station 1595+00 and 1597+70 and 16- feet-maximum allowable cover between Station 1597+70 and 1602'00 for our San Diego Pipeline No. 5 in this area. Please revise your grading plans accordingly. The actual cover over the San Diego Pipeline Nos. 4 and 5 must be determined by pot- holing or other means acceptable to Metropolitan and must be done under Metro- politan's supervision. Access to Metropolitan's adjacent properties must be main- tained across any proposed road crossings. The submitted conceptual grading plans did not provide enough information to deem the project acceptable. The project proponent must submit detailed grading plans and sections of the proposed road crossings including fill slope adjacent to Metropolitan's fee right-of-way. Please note that any additional fill of 2 feet and above our pipeline and fee right-of- way, a soils report and/or settlement analysis showing the predicted settlement of the pipeline at 10-foot intervals along with the method of settlement analysis, laboratory testing results and any other supporting documents must be submitted for our review. We are transmitting a copy of our geotechnical guidelines for your information and use. 4. To accommodate our access, 16-foot-wide driveway approaches must be provided on both sides of the proposed roads along our existing access road within our fee right- of-way. Access ramps, where necessary, must be provided from the drive-way approaches. The grades of these ramps must not exceed 10 percent unless the ramps are paved, then the grades may be a maximum of 20 percent. Gates or re-movable bollards, capable of accommodating Metropolitan's locks, must be in-stalled at these Mr. Matt Peters Page 4 April 14, 2015 politan. We require that the storm drain line be extended across our pipe-lines and that the rip-rap maintains a minimum of 20 feet beyond the edge of our San Diego Pipeline No. 4. We have no objections with the proposed storm drain line and rip-rap along the future "Western Bypass" corridor over our San Diego Pipeline Nos. 4 and 5 within our fee right-of-way and discharges at the bottom edge of the embankment, as shown on Sheet 8 of 12 of your conceptual grading plans, is acceptable to Metropolitan. How- ever, we request that storm drain lines crossing must maintain a minimum of 1 foot of vertical clearances over the top of our pipelines. In addition, the storm drain lines must include secondary containment which consists of a continuous steel sleeve or HDPE pipe with fusion-welded joints, extending 10 feet beyond the edges of our pipelines. 6. Our comments and requirements regarding the tentative tract map are as follows: a. Monutnentation for the boundary of Metropolitan's fee right-of-way should be described, shown, and referenced with the proper mathematical ties along measured and record lines, so that their correct location may be determined. Copies of calculations prepared should also be submitted. Any monument recovered from Record of Survey 127/80-93, indicating Metropolitan's location, should also be shown and referenced on the submitted map. b. The entire boundary of Metropolitan's fee property must be defined with bearing and distances for reference on the final map. C. Prior to construction of any improvements for this tract, the developer's engineer and/or land surveyor must prepare and file confer records for the preservation of Metropolitan's monuments within the areas of the proposed improvement or grading. Any monuments that may have been destroyed by impending work done to date must be replaced accordingly. 7. We request a stipulation be added to all pertinent plans or specifications to notify Darwin Potter or Gerri Michael of our Water System Operations Group, telephone Mr. Matt Peters Page 5 April 14, 2015 (951) 926-5853, at least two working days prior to starting any work in the vicinity of our facilities and right-of-way. We are returning prints of Sheets 1, 8, 9, 11 and 12 of 12 of the:conceptual grading plans and Sheets 1 through 6 of 6 of the Tentative Tract Map No. 30129, stamped "REVIEWED CORRECTIONS NOTED —RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED." Facilities constructed within Metropolitan's fee property shall be subject to the paramount right of Metropolitan to use the fee property for the purpose for which it was acquired. If at any time Metropolitan or its assigns should, in the exercise of their rights, find it necessary to remove any of the facilities from the fee property, such removal and replacement shall be at the expense of the owner of the facility. For any further correspondence with Metropolitan relating to this project, please make reference to the Substructures Job Number shown in the upper right-hand corner of the first page of this letter. Should you require any additional information, please contact Ken Chung, telephone (213) 217-7670. Very truly yours, ;f Kieran M. Callanan, P.E. Manager, Substructures Team KC/km DOCS:4046-15-001 Enclosures (2 1) rA DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY Los Angeles District Corps of Engineers Regulatory Division-Carlsbad Field Office 5900 La Place Court,Suite 100 Carlsbad,CA 92008 May 18, 2015 A;(EN I ION OF Office of the Chief Regulatory Division Mr. Matthew Peters Project Planner P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, California 92589-9033 SUBJECT: Mformation regarding requirement for Department of the Army Permit Dear Mr.Peters: This is in response to information received regarding Altair Specific Plan. Based on the information you have provided, we are Linable to determine if the proposed work would be regulated under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act. Please review your project and determine if you need a permit. Applications and additional information are available on our website http://w",w.spl.usace.armv.mit/Missions/Regulatory/PerniitProcess.aspx. If you have any questions, please contact Shari Johnson of my staff at 760-602-4829 or via e-mail at Shari.Johnson@usace.arnny.mil. �inc�rrl�. Therese O. Bradford Chief, South Coast Branch SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA I DISC)N An EDISON INTF.RNATIONA0 Company City of Temecula September 17, 2015 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 Attention: Planning Department Subject: Tract Map No. 36959 Please be advised that the division of the property shown on Tract Map No. 36959 will not unreasonably interfere with the free and complete exercise of any facilities and/or easements held by Southern California Edison Company within the boundaries of said map. This letter should not be construed as a subordination of the Company's rights, title and interest in and to said easement(s), nor should this letter be construed as a waiver of any of the provisions contained in said easement(s) or a waiver of costs for relocation of any affected facilities. In the event that the development requires relocation of facilities, on the subject property, which facilities exist by right of easement or otherwise, the owner/developer will be requested to bear the cost of such relocation and provide Edison with suitable replacement rights. Such costs and replacement rights are required prior to the performance of the relocation. If you have any questions, or need additional information in connection with the subject subdivision, please contact me at (626) 302-4473. Steven D. Lowry Title and Real Estate Services l Corporate Real Estate Department cc: Butsko Utility Design, Inc. 2131 Walnut Grove Avenue Rosemead,CA 91770 EASTERN MUNICIPAL W WATER DISTRICT September 21, 2016 Altair Development Re: Conceptual Approval to grant utility crossings within Eastern Municipal Water District(EMWD) Easements Altair TTM 36959,City Of Temecula This letter is to grant conceptual approval for the utility crossings across existing EMWD easements shown on the Tentative Tract Map 36959 (attached) for the proposed storm drains, water and dry utilities. The location of these utilities will be generally in the same vicinity as shown (attached) and shall be exactly determined and established during final engineering phase. These crossings shall conform to all of EMWD Standards and Specifications as well as the requirements described in the existing easements. At final engineering all designs of these utility crossings shall be reviewed and approved by EMWD. EMWD has had the opportunity to review the conceptual grading plan. In order to accommodate access to gravity mains, where EMWD sewers are proposed outside of roadways, access shall be provided through the construction of a minimum 20 foot wide Decomposed Granite surface capable of sustaining HS-20 vehicle loading. Sufficient ingress and egress shall be provided, including turn- arounds. Sincerely, Maria E. Sambito Director of New Business Cc: John Ward, Director of Engineering Services Armando Arroyo, Senior Civil Engineer Attachments MES 2270 Trumble Road • P.O.Box 8300 • Perris,CA 92572-8300 T 951.928.3777 • F 951.928.6177 emwd.org ATTACHMENT 10B TTM 36959 PROJECT SUMMARY TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 36959-1 36959-2 36959-3 AND 36959 PHASE t:TR 36569-7 PHASE 3:TR 36569-3 ' ' NOT LAND USE (FOSS) NGTE Np1 LAND USE �GROE S) NOTE Cos CITY O F TEMECULA 1 RESIDENTAL 6.18 - RESIDENTIAL 2.55 - COMPANIES A 2 RESIDENTIAL 4.17 -. 2 RESIDENTIAL 2.32 - 3 RESIDENTIAL 2.3b 3 RESIDENTIAL 1.96 - R CL P '^-4 RESIDENTIAL - 2.89 - -- RESIDENTIAL 2.'S --- -- R/W P/W 4C. 5 RESIDENTIAL 7.24 - 5 RESIDENTIAL 1.51 _ q _ 5 RESIDENTIAL 5.16 - 6 RESIDENTIAL 1.23 Too F/W ( 10 1 CGF SS LASEME NL - PUBLIC Ulur,W ] OPEN SPACE 4.83 110A 7 RESIDENTIAL 1.17 24 i2 �heMO Cq// OKp7.NOPO B OPEN SPACE 29.37 CONSERVATION B RESIDENTIAL 2.51 - A RIDGE PARK DRNE 0.09 PUBLIC R/W 9 RESIDENTIAL 1.42 PKWY �-� - _ _ ` q \ B WESTERN BYPASS 2.37 PUBLIC R,/W 10 RESIDENTIAL a.51 g' "' 11 \ 2� 1 r,OFF-SIDE MORAGA Eh T",PES R09p \ C ALTAIR VISTA 0]2 PUBLIC R/W '1 RESIDENTAL 452 - 4/�5 r 2% S \ D RIDGE PARK DRNE OG4 PUBLIC R/W 6' 2' 2 PKC- 7' 12 12' 14' 12 36 12 T 8 7 AL \ IKEWA q c 19h E4'MORACA X1 BI' 12 OPEN SPACE 540 HOA - _ .t_ XHiBI G, 13 OPEN SPACE 4.88 HOA 5, % 29 _ MP+ �7 -1a PARE o.80 non \'- u 2y �'� TRACT MAP / PHASE 2:TR 36569-2 15 REN SPACE 0.74 HOA x q+ I NO.36959-1 % LOT LAND USE AREA NOTE 12 WATER I / PP N0. (GROSS) 16 OPEN SPACE 0.52 HOA �1z'WATER J) COROMELL TRAIL(PRIVATE) (SHEET 4) A 1 SCHOOL/RESIDENTAL 707 - 17 PARK 0.25 HOA 8'R=CYCLED WATER 1 _ 18 OPEN SPACE 0.38 HOA WESTERN BYPASS CORRIDOR (PUBLIC) STA n+oo 13+25 \ 0 3 RESDENTIAL 3.74 _ _ 2 19 OPEN SPACE 2-64 HOA 100'R/WVAR2 �Q 4 RESIDENTIAL 1.63 - 20 OPEN SPACE 8.30 CONSERVATION STA 177+10 TO 186+55 OPEN SPACE R R ` � , k 5 RESIDERTML/NIXED USE O.4G A WESTERN BYPASS 470 PUBLIC R/W STA 227+50 TO 241+83 4 B ALTAIR VISTA 2A2 PRNATE R W HOA MAINTAINED) 58' 8 ',/ 6 RESIDENTIAL 2.53 - / W 7 RESIDENTIAL 1.64 - C 'B'STREET N 1.43 PRNATE R/W / ACCESS EASEMENT 3 2 W D "B'STREET N 0.36 PUBLIC R W RAW R R iW OPEN SPACE BENCH MIN PUBUC UTILITY W I \ 8 RESIDENTIAL 1.84 - -__ / R W l VAR-- - 9 RESIDENTIAL _ _ 1.53 - -- LOT 5' 6 1 6 20' _{4' \ 10 REs1DENIA1 - 1.30 - PHASE 4:TR 36569 a 100' 2' 2C' _ _ (PUBLIC ACCESS zT Al M to - IN 4 5 11 RESIDENTIAL 1.80 42 42' EASEMENT) A} 2' I - LOT AREA 22' ��� BIKE LANE LANE BIKE LAND USE NOTE j 16' z \ 1z RESIDENTIAL 2.29 - Na (GROSS) 7' '2' 12 S' 12' 5' ''2' 12' VARIES 3' 9' 3 MqX 2%LANE 2% Z LANE B 13 COMMUNITY CENTER 0.3E HOA i RESIDENTIAL 2.50 M 14 RECREATION CENTER 1.75 HOA 2 RESIDENTIAL 4.55 S PNWAY ',. IKEWA q,1. 2 - � 1 _ 4X] 2% ) 7,- ..,,....y,h 15_ OPEN SPACE 4.54 HOA 3 CHIC 16.13 - Ii10'SEWER 8' Mq'i 1 16 OPEN SPACE -_- 0.78 HOA a OPEN SPACE D.31 Hoa WATER 2$U 18 17 OPEN SPACE 0.52 HOA 5 OPEN SPACE 0.'2 HOA _ zz % COROMELL TRAIL(PRIVATE) CH STREET __._- - 18 OPEN SPACE 4.60 HOA 6 OPEN SPACE 042 HOA 18"STORM GRAIN -� 7/ B 1 N.A.P. 19 PARK 5.04 PUBLIC PARK 7 OPEN SPACE 4.26 HOA 9� qX z SPAT LANES,SEPARATE TRAIL,WITH NO PARKING w J� --Mq'/ STA 14+SC TO 33+00 1 /T 1 1$`- 7 20 OPEN SPACE 0.59 HOA 8 OPEN SPACE 4.23 CONSERVATION 6'RECYCLED WATER r 1 i$ r 21 OPEN SPACE 0-83 HOA 9 OPEN SPACE 34.63 CONSERVATION 22 OPEN SPACE 1.63 HOA 10 OPEN SPACE 2.61 CONSERVATION WESTERN BYPASS CORRIDOR (PUBLIC) R R 1 _ 23 OPEN SPACE 1.35 HOA A WESTERN BfPA55 2.87 PUBLIC R/W 100'P/W N STA 186+55 TO 227+50 PUBLIC UTILITY&ACCESS EASEMENT �+ C Z --`. 3 24 OPEN SPACE 1.80 HOA B 'B'STREET S. 0.31 PUBLIC R/W TRACT MAP O C p 25 OPEN SPACE 8.06 CONSERVATION C "C'STREET 0.]D PUBLIC R/W PROP.E%I S'. EXIST PROP. 32' ¢ - R/W R/W R/W R W 1 a A ---WESTERN BYPASS 5.13 PUBLIC R/W J PROP.80'R/W { P12' 16:_-- 16' PKWY NO.36959-2 1 OV 4 1 B ALTAIR VISTA 0.87 PUBLIC R/W t0 q WALK LANE LANE PANG' W P / I Z / C 19 MAIN STREET p COROMELL TR 2.17 PRIVATE R/W z, 2' T 5 12 12' B' S T (SHEET 5) C ALTAIR a 14 1 ' 1 TRAIL 2.73 PRNATE R/W k 2% % / E COROMELL TRAIL 040 PUBLIC R/W fi 32' /W 6a 32 Y ET4wF�L__ EXISTING R �^--�ryF' I 5 _ A-STREET _ 091 PRUATE R/W LANE IA WALK / / w $ TOTAL(GROSS ACREAGE) 269.91 Ex.lz WaTFR z% -�.n+ ��o�sEwER x 1- 11 7 F g 1 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUMMARY _._-_____-F-236_. _ --}y-- _ -- 12'WA'ERJ 1 TOTAL(NET ACREAGEI .65 - I ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.: 922-210-049,940-310-013,W-310-015. PX n^ q 940-310-016,940-310-044.940-310-045, NOTE:AREA CALCULATIONS NOT TO INCLUDE 1M - � ALTAIR VISTA$"A"STREET(PRIVATE) 24� 9 I 940-310-046,s40-310-047.940-310-048. LOTS-D AND E(TRACT MAP 36959).PROPOSED 24'FM--�) EX.20'FM URBAN PARKWAYS WITH PARKING ONE SIDE 1 ^A 12 10 940-320-001,B'40 2C-002.940-320-003, LOTS TO BE ACQUIRED B+PERMANENT ALTAIR VISTA TR 36959-2 LOT'C'STA 18+SC TO 33+35 940-320-004,940-320-005.940-32D-006, EASEMENT By MWD AS SUMMARIZED BELOW. B'RECYCLED WA'Eft �`Ex.8"SEWER ALTAIR NSTA TR 36959-3 LOT'B'STA 1.2+15 TO 20+65 *' SEE DETAI!9 940-320-007 __. 'A'STREET STA 0+00 TO 7+80 21 22 7 SHEET S TOTAL AREA GROSS: 259.91 ACRES BJILDABLE LOT TOTAL '07.21 AC VINCENT MORAGA(PUBLIC) I l� TOTAL AREA NET 366s ACRES 1] OPEN SPACE TOTAL '28.38 AC BO'R/W p 1 TOTAL AREA FOR LETTERED LOTS: 28.22 ACRES STA 165+SD TO 177+50 46'PUBLIC I,TILITY k ACCESS EASEMENT R 50' 3 EXISTING ZONING. BP,SP-B,HR,OS CIRCULA-ICN TOTAL 28.22 AC rE 2-7 t. R PUBLIC UTILITY k ACCESS EASEMENT R FIRST/ STREET PROPOSED ZONING: SP(SPECIFIC P-AN) MqX 0 12 Mq�,' 1e• 1 E EROPOS ZONING USE. VA ANT MWD EASEMENT AREAS R/W ]B'R/W R/W PKWY 24' PKWY 24' PKWY�" 1 20 2 4 / PRROSED LAND USE: PER SPECIFIC PLAN 2 12 12 5 7' MAXIMUM LOT SIZE: PER SPECIFIC PLAN LOT .AND L'SE AREA NOTE 0' 12 12 5 8' ' TRACT MAP RC Geos) LANE LANE W MINIMUM LOT SZE'. PER SPECIFIC PLAN PROTECT IMPROVEMENTS n PKWY LANE LANE LASS TRACT BOL1NIiARY AVERAGE LOT SIZE: PER SPECIFIC PLAN D STREET 0.29 PUBUC R/W PRorecr IN PACE �� BIKE NO.36959 3 9 5 13 _ 2% MINIMUM LOT DIMENSIONS: PER SPECIFIC PLAN 56' 22 2% _ .2% 77 - 8 $ 1 4.0.R Lors: 63LOTS 'B'STREET 5.- 0.48 PUB R/W' 2z (SHEET 6) 12 2' 11' 28 2B' 11' 1 / NO OF LETTERED LOTS: 19 PROPOSED DENSITY(ROSS): PER SPECIFIC PLAN PNWV LANE LANE PKWY PROPOSED DENSITY NET: PER SPECIFIC P_AN B NO of PHASES ( ) a LEGAL DESCRIPTION TRACT BOUNDARY 1 $ Ex 12'WATER-= - "B"STREETNN. P + ' EX.82 SEwER� y,P SEC TX.iIBI1�E'FOR TR 36568 q/ -2% , ISEE EXHIBIT'E"FR E%. 'e"&2C' 9 6 SEE SHEET 2 RETAIN�.NG WALL EMWJ FORCE MAINS 1 APPLICANT GENERAL NOTES Ex za"se RIVATE) "B"STREET N.(PRIVATES I 17 - - Cl,- - J AMBIENT COMMUNITIES LANDSCAPED PARKWAYS WITH NO PARKING LANDSCAPED PARKWAYS WITH NO PARKING 1 179 CALLE MAGDALENA,02O1 1_ TH.'S TENTATIVE MAP IS EXC'-USIVELY UNDER THE OWNERSHIP OF TH"[TEMECI:LA WEST VILLAGE,LLC.AND RIDGE PARK DRIVE (PUBLIC) Sr'10+DC-0 15+85 STA 15+85 TO 22+93 ENCINITAS,CA 92D24 INCLUDES THE ENTIRE TRACT BOUNDARY AS SHOWN. CITY$TD.NO 103A 1 R ;760)230-1000 2, ALL EXISTING STRUCTURES ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY SHALL BE REMOVED, R R IL 20 I I 13 }, A WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN(WQMP)LULL BE E ROMEO FOR THE PROJECT SITE, 76'R/W LOT to � y 4. LETTERED l0?S WILL BE OWNED AND MAINTAINED BY THE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION,EXCEPT FOR THOSE R/W Ct R/W 45{ VARIES 45' I yW �� OWNER WNICHWLL BE DEDICATED AS PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAYS. PUBIC UTILITY @ACCESS EASEMEN" PARK '� PUBUC UTILITY h ACCESS EASEMEN 1 A -C P (� 5. SET-BACKS: PER SPECIFIC PLAN VARIES 70'-83 28' j 28' , 10�' y TEMECULA WEST VILLAGE,LLC MIN.SIDE YARD SETBACK=5' 179 CALLE MAGDALENA./201 MIN-REAR SETBACK=5' 2' PKWA6' 20 -33 PROP 13' 20'-33' S' 6' 2' 'PAD 2./ W�52 '.PK LANE* PKNG K WALK ' (760)230-1000 6. DES'6NG O RHEAD UTI PURL CHA L BE LKIDER-ROUNDED ER CITY OF TEMECULA ORDINANCER W _ 4' 4' 14 14' EXIS LITIES CONST 1233'-39' 37' 44' 11' J ENCINITAS,CA 92024 _% - 1 Q SPECIFICATIONS. MENTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY CODE,STANDARDS AND WALK 6 VARIES VARIES VARIES fi WALK 4y - 1ENGINEER 8ANY MONUMENT LOCATED IN THE PUBIC STREET RIGHT CFWA1 SHA.L BE PLACED IN ACCORDANCE WITH BIKEBIKE 1y. ( - /Li�� ' MAr PAD P THE CITY OF TR ECULARESER TRAFFIC ANC'TO FILE U TIPL DESGN MAPS LER EC MONUMENT PLACEMEN2% LANE % 2% LANE % 1MANS A w I S CWS COMPANIES 7 I LANOSGAPED I 2 J 9. 'HE SUBDIVIDER RESERVES THE RIGHT TO FILE MULTIPLE FINAL MAPS PER SEC 66456.1 OF THE STATE MAP ?7 C PARKWAYS VAT' ( 202E..AMINE DEL RIO NORTH ACT AIT[1000 ' iy 1 �'1 10. ALL I PRI V DRAIN WATER PRIVATEL 2t'STORM DRAIN B'SEWER 4} 12'WATER) NO-ARK NO `8"WATER 7 V m 1 SF DETAIL C SAN DIEGO,CA 92108 '.1. NO KNOWN AIVEh AU TTSM HAVE BEEN MAPPED ATgLTHE SUBJECT SSITE ALTH BE SITE IS NOT LOCATED[WITHIN AN ALTAIR VISTA-ONE-WAY(PRIVATE) l 8 �� �SHEET] Qy� ALOOIST-PRIOLO EARTHOUAKE FAULT HAZARD ZONE R A RIVERSIDE COUNTY FAULT ZONE.THE NEAREST 12'WATERY ALTAIR VISTA(PUBLIC) oNE-WAY STREET WTH PARKING ONE SIDE / q KNOWN ACTIVE SURFACE FAULT'S THE TEMECULA SECTION(MLLARD FAULT)OF THE ELSINORE FAULT ZONE. TR 36959-1 LOT'C STA 10-FOO TO 14+50 STA 34+93(NORTH)TO 9+90(SOUTH) _ '2. PRDPERTY LIES WITHIN ZONE'X'PER FIRM MAP NUMBER 06065C3285G DATED AUGUST 28,2008. TR 36959-2 LOT'B" STA 14.50 TO 17+54 ' Z 18 o '}. THIS TENTATIVE MAP INCLUDES THE ENTIRE CONPGUOJS R OWNERSHIP, R/W q R W PROP EXIST. R Q P 4� 14_ THS IS A MAP OF A RESIDENTIAL/COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL CONDOMN JM PROJECT AS DEFINED IN SECTION * _ / 032 1350 OF THE STATE OF CALFORNIA CIVIL CODE. eo'R/W i R/w n'R/W R/W � 1 �, PRT.31 R/WEXIST.39'R/W 48 _ BASISOF BEARINGS WEEN Ncs coos sraloNs Dn7o46 AND oM]Sz4 BEING Net V vUB!IC UTILITY k ACCESS EASEMENT 'r N.A.P. B O HE BASIS OF BEARINGS HEREON ARE BASED ON GPS STATIC OBSERVATIONS AND ARE ON'HE S1A-E P'2926 W A EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS PLACE A 41' TRACT BOUNDARY PROTECT IN PLACE 38 1 `� �� E ANE CW. ALL DI SYSTEM SHO CA zz' 22 _�1% s6' I 2a' 1 c STREET SYSTEM( 0405 5 7' 12' 12' 7" 5' NAD POCH LL DISTANCES SHOWN /� - ,v --- 2NE LA P - % ( 2% C- 5 OJND DISTANCES TO OBTAIN[RIO DISTANCES MULTIPLY THE ROUND DISTANCE B"THE CSF R 0.99994630. 7 2 KWY 3' S 8' 6' 72 12 2' 4' 1 Q $ B STREET 5. HEREON ARE CR 2% - WALKAl PKNG BIKE LAN UNE BP LANE LANE W2% LANE LANE K LEGEND z % TRACT MAP LANE Lo I . CENTER.INE � ,r WA,vR- 1 p' ,31 NO.36959 PROPOSED PRGPERTY INE W R/W LINE C"STREET yyy roecE nn�us- 6'RE ALTAIR VISTA-C LVERT PRIVATE 1 0 (SHEET 7) B"RECIC-ED ) 10'SEWER 12'WATER .X g• y p \J 9 WATT) L, 9 STREET `8"RECYC.ED WATER) -4Y S-ORM ,No AF°°M' GRAN ( ) I Y EYISTING PROP,RT�LING k R/W LINE 8� 'B"STREE�5. PUBLIC) z x � �o oCAL STREET(MODIFIED) FIRST STREET(PUBLIC) A"STREET-BRIDGE (PRIVATE) I a 1 LL K "g2�^4. - - - ULTIMATE ROW LINE 60 R/W CONTIGUOUS SIDEWALKS NTH NO PARKING(BRIDGE/CULVERT LOCATIONS) v, S'REET TR 36959_OT_'L0 'C'dt'F' STA 26+48 70 STA.33+37 ]1 R;W ��`, ExISTING EASEMENT Al LAIR VISTA TR 36959-2 10 B STA 3} 35 TO 3?+15 1 - / / `,5�� '^_'STREET TR 36959 LOTS'D'k'E SiA_000�0 5+50 ALTAIR NSTP TR 36959 3 101'B'SIA 10+50 TO I7+15 � '� R/W R/W R/w P/W ;� R/w "A"STREF STA'IABD TO 9+1C 1 / �,� -- --- PRRDSED EASEMENT / ^ TRACT BOUNDARY L WAR'S ) wln'H 1p / a IT 71 R W 1,. PKWY G BDUNDARY OPCh SPACE PHASING 45 I (n0A MAINTAINED VARIF< � iu"ro PHASINGMAP VILLAGE MAP — -_ Rati Po astiC°C�7F 0111 Ho - cyO�" ° o�ao ►�---� � °R4,q � � r 1'"'NQ°9 LEGAL DESCRIPTION ► \ e qG \ BEING PORTIONS OF PARCE-S 20 1,AND 23 THROUGH 29 INC�LSNE O PARCEL MAP 113254,AS SHOWN BY MAP RECORDED IN \ a I BOON 66 PAGES 6 THROUGH 78 OF SAID COUNTY ALSO BEING A PORTON OF THE RANCHO SANTA ROSA AND RANCHO CALIFORNIA I > p AND A PORTION 0. PARCEL 4 OF PARCEL MAP 10814,AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 78 PAGES 5 THROUGH 8 OF SAID GDJNTY ALSO 0 THE RANCHO SANTA ROSA AND RANCHO CALIFORNIA AND PARCELS THROUGH 4 INCLUSIVE BEING A PORTION 1 OF .Cly El o ► 7 PARCEL MAP 23969.AS SHOWN BY MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 169 PAGES 11 THROUGH 13 OF SAID COJNTI ALOS BEING A PORTION OF 7 THE RANCHO SANTA ROSA AND RANCHO CALIFORNIA,IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA,COUNTY O�RIVERSIDE,STATE OF CAL'70RNIA. ► ► ti °e SAID DESCRIBED PROPERTY AS COUNTY EO RECORD OF SURVEY RECORDED JUNE 2, ir0P IN BOOK 144 PAGES 13-HROUGH 16 ON ► OPEN 1 �A °� TRACT MAP\ 1 A 2 N FILE AT THE OFFICE Ox THE COUNTY REORDER OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY,STATE OF CA_IFORNM." TRACT MAP NO.36959 i SPACE z o NO.36959.1 ,D - k NORTH PHASE D g ,%V A' 6 3 2 w 3 2 ¢ \ PROPOSED EASEMENTS ` `` 4 5 ❑A INDICATES AN UNRECORDED PRIVATE EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC '1 5 ACCESS AND UDID TIES TO BE RESERVE[ON THE LINA_MAP. 7 PR'..VATE EASEMENT FOR STORM DRAIN PURPOSES,TO BE 7 VILLAGE'B' \ 7 g RESERVE[ON THE=INAL MAP. B VA%I © 1 PRIVATE EASEMENT FOR MAINTENANCE AND ACCESS PURPOSES LEGEND �""'°�-�..,,�,b ,e y_. © 1 1y, ,. �j INDICATES AN UNRECORDED RERMANEN-EASEMENT FOR 25 c L—i ACCESS AND PUBLIC UTILITIES i0 BE RESERVED FROM MWD. VILLAGE BOUNDARIES 25 16 ,x "` �rt�AI 18 ' "+"`""^ x 5TH STREET [7EPRIVATEEASEMENT FOR SANITARY SEWER PURPOSES.TO BE 4, 6TH STREET RESERVES ON FINAL MAP. .� m.»a,... PHASE BOUNDARYW B I N.A.P r F PRIVATE EASEMENT FOR WATER PURPOSES-TO BE RESERVED � B 1 N A.P. w 1 A 1 15`— K ON FINAL MAP 16 j PRIVATE EASEMENT FOR FUE,MODFICATION ACCESS AND 1 i6 w E MAINTENANCE PURPOSES. O IU VIL I GEC' TRACT MAP o - D o PUBLIC EASEMENT FOR Acces PURPOSES TRACT MAP s ° NO.36959.2 1 2 q, 3 NO.36959.2 I 4 d CENTRAL PHASE 1 y 1 C 19 1 I n 14 D 1 TREET I m1 PARK MAINSTaEET 1 I MAIN S 1 w 5 EXISTING EASEMENTS w I 1 6 1 AEASEMENT TO EAS'ERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT FOR SEWER 7 ER IN 3 11 7 F 6 I 6 1 PURPOSES,PEET,NO.1990-351810.REL.SEPTEMBER 27.1990 VIL El C 1 I N �EASEMENI FOR PUBLIC ROAD AND LTILI'Y PURPOSES PER 24 PER INST.N0.19138-93875,REC.APRIL 8,1988 AND RE-RECORDED 124 O ..w 1 A 12 N 14 9 I PER INST N0.1988-99905,REC.APRIL 15,1988 1 A 12 10 9 EASEMENT TO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY PER x21 e^x1, 22 D INST NO,1981-114969,REC.JUNE 19,1981 D I 21 22 1 17 I .1 'w 17 ACASEMENT FOR SEWER PIPELINES PER DEED,INST NO.1987-32494', AND 1967-324947,REC.NOVEMBER 12,1987 1 3 FIRST"STREET TRACT MAP 1 3 ;f FIRST x STREET TM 3QEASEMENT FOR SEWER PIPELINES PER DEED,INS' TRACT MAP 20 2 4 / E NO.36959.3 . 1 1 21 2 4 / E NO 1987-324947,REC NOVEMBER 12.1981 Q / 1 !FJ\EASEMENT FOR SEWER PIPELINES PER DEED,TIAs? NO.36959.3 I 19 5 3 15 13 VIL SOUTH PHASE I 19 NO.1987-324951,REC.NOVEMBER 12,1987 18 / EASEMENT FOR SEVER PIPELINES PER DEED,INST_ 6 / 1 12 5 / NO 1987-324955,REC NOVEMBER 12,1987 1 12 VIL 'E' / � Z' EASEMENT TO FAR ERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT FOR SEWER B BI PURPOSES,PER INST NO,1990-188789,REC MAY 23.1990 9 U 6 EASEMENT TO EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT FOR SEWER a 9 6 / PURPOSES,PER INST.N0.1990-188790,REC.MAY 23,1990 0) 17 1 17 / eEASEMENI TO RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRIC-FOR PIPEINE 2 ' 1 7 / PURPOSES,PER INST.N0.2001-505014,REG OCTOBER'7,2001 O / 51 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT TO RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER 26I 13/ DISTRICT,PER INST.NO 2001-505018,REC OCTOBER 17,2001 I 120 7j 13/ t 1rx / QEASEMENT TO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON PER A I / I A 10!.� C Q'<' 2� MST.NO.1977-113639,REC.JUNE 20.1977 1 U ii 1a,' C I y Rrc,n. ........ ILLO J II EXISTING EASEMENTS TO BE VACATED '11 III I c 1 v L�EASEMENT FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS PER PARCEL MAP / g PHASING SUMMARY A N I N0,23969 BOOK 16,PAGES 11-13 Q� AREA y ¢ �J EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC ROAD AND UTILITY PURPOSES PER P.M.18254 ► A J PHASE TRACT WP N0. VILLAGE }}} ' (GROSS A.C.) 7 BE 116 PGS 69-78 1° AL-AGE'A' 15.60 ,E 11 m 7 11 m I NORTH TRACT 59- 6 4; EASEMENT FOR SEWER PIPELINES PER DEED,INS-. / � /�N0.1987-324959,REC.NOVEMBER 12,1987 6 w� N0.36959-1 VILLAGE'B' 1240 � TRACT MAP VILLAGE'C'NORTH 774 / 2 x,16 D p AEASEMENT FOR SEWER PIPELINES PER DEED,INS'. 2 16 D �? CENTRAL NO.36959-2 VILLAGE'C'SOUTH 13.32 �• Q. ND,1987-324967,REG.NOVEMBER 12,1987 " 8.98 A 2AEASEMENI TO METROPC,ITAN WATER ILLAG G `" 32 NORA369 9P3 OS ' `\` -� \ \ 3 PURPOSES,TPER INSNOiAt9 OA 16367,S RC1 rOR ROAD 1 SOUTH N'UGE E' 784 O PURPOSES,PER INST NO 1968 65727,REC.JU.Y 11,1968 TR TER -, a vaucE'F' 9 03 N.A.P g N.A.P. OAD BICT FOR FEBRUARY A � � O TRA['MAP VILLAGE'G' C.FEBRUARY 26,1970 [NIC NO 36959 CMC SITE 16.1] 1 [STREET E TRACT MAP 4 GSTSEET 8STREETS \ g 1 4 5 e STREET s NO.36959 9 c 6 C 6 1 ° 1 0� 9 CIVIC SITE 1 z x 1 I � 1 ; I TRACT MAP 1 I NO.36959 I w I I 10 CIVIC PHASE W► ,� o I Q a ,1s OPEN 1 SPACE ; 1 / / GRAPHIC SCALE 1 / GRAPHIC SCALEV .1400 0 200 400 No 1200 400 0 200 400 1300 1200 LLJ LLJ lr P_LM w w w OQO %yME Ir ww PUJOL STREET c01EB s; P O N85'17 ssw 122 82 6 — 040 _ _ __ 58' 7 97 1 __ __ _ 27 9 3 8 � .� B. W N33' S6.WILL 396 �_ N45'31 40'W 863.78 �� N45'3020"W 1090.3 �� ��� � N45'3149"W _ ______ _ ____ ---1'' A, 1 �Y t1 1 N4a'za's7"E F 4, L=31.27,RP47,00'J 206.32' � 0 30 AR 7-7 9 N7'S1t0E Fn. 6.06 X09 - 4 c-(�`` ' RIDGE P,gRk qua � 7` � OLl/I' 16203'48"E P4R_F.4 LF9�„ I' �\9-, 162.03' N45 i � 2, ARJEL 3 .. .AP(EL2e /AA \ o '" W ry \ h ­CEL'3 \ 7' �� R 24 \ �� Pa EL M4P 154N4s29211Y 930.78' ((� Z Rca< w 1 N42'Li 7'48"W PMa 1'6/69--3 155.12' ,;RCEL 20 wl J..<.3�59'23 W .e N4T0447"w ' '325.67 225,35 �, P~RC / 77,—9, N38'29'S9"W�� 1 se4.eg 3��� OFTION FAF.EL 9 154 �5`. N3B'28422 05,7, _ - y`\ N66 13 W 250.08' 2]"Fy PnR�EL MAP CE_'S - 685.1 LMB EXISTING EASEMENTS 5�EASEMENT TO EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT FOR SEWER PURPOSES.PER INST. 10.1990-357810,REC.SEPTEMBER 27,1990 EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC ROAD AND UTILITY PURPOSES PER N45'29'21"W 930,78' PER INST,NO.1988-93815,REC.APRIL B.1988 AND RE-RECORDED .ER INST.N0.1988-99905,REC APRIL 15,1988 o PUJOL STREET EASEMENT TO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA CAS COM?ANY PER , INST.N0.'981-114959.REC.JUNE 19,'.981 �o� O'FSITE RAW DEDICATION / __ PER TR 36568 EASEMENT FOR SEWER PIPE_INES PER DEED,INST.N0.1987-324941, oma' i SEE DETAIL„A„ AND 1987-324947.REC.NOVEMBER 12,1987 r1 N73'59'02"E FARCE- EASEMENT MAL' �gc,E ti N45'292*W 93078 - EASEMENT FOR SEWER PIPELINES PER DEED,INS'_ " - 65 50' [[��NO.1987 324947,REC.NOVEMBER 12,1987 = �{ \\ �'- PMP 2'1,;/10C-102 /EASEMENT FOR SEWER PIPE INES PER DEED,INST. N76, N16'OD'S8'W 40.1987 324951,REC.NOVEMBER 12,1987 / \SOS 126.92 kEM4 NC[R �Ak.E, EASEMENT FOR SEWER PIPELINES PER DEED,INST. N0.1987-324955,REC.NOVEMBER 12,1487 P,T 1...ul \6`z. //41\\ 1 EASEMENT TO EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT FOR SEWER 9 ` � c➢ / -_ � �� PURPOSES PER INST.NO,1990 188789 REC.MAY 23,1990 QEASEMENT TO"ASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT FOR SEWER �� ,lo /l 20 I Qzq_B5 PURPOSES,PER INST.NO,1990-88790,4EC.MAY 23,1990 DETAIL "A" ,� �• EASEMENT TO RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT FOR20 N'T' PURPOSES,PER INST NO.2001-505014,REC 0„TOBEk'7,7,20011 �' , F P IFi t12EUr TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT TO RANCHO FORMA WATER `O9 DISTRICT PER INST.NO 2001-5050'8 REC OCTOBERR17,17,200' � MB 8 ,\\?„ Q EASEMENT TO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON PER - �% - N� '.NST.ND.1977-113639,REC.JUNE 20,1977 1 1 86 �R''s> EXISTING EASEMENTS TO BE VACATED 9\EASEMENT FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS PER PARCEL MAP N0.23960,E(J N 16,PAGES 1'-'3 EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC ROAD AND UTI.ITY PURPOSES PER P.18254 \ Y _ A RN'16,/LOS 69-78 QEASEMENT FOR S:WER PIPELINES PER DEED,INSt. N0.1987-324959,REC.NOVEMBER.2,1987 44 EASEMI FOR SEWER PIPE-INES PER DEED,INS- 40 NS401987-324967,REC NOVEMBER 12,1987 4 ND. 4r,E1 QEASEMENT TO MITROPOLI'AN WATER DISTINCT=0R ROAD LMP „ 7 PURPOSES.PER INST.N0.1968-6572],REC JULY 11,1968 6NAFliIC$GALE N4905'09"W 762 2�_—� 200 0 IDO 200 400 600 — M1� —-- l4.511 E u\EASEMENT TO METROPOLI"AN WATER DISTRICT PDR ROAD �� 'GRPOSES,PER INST.N0.197D-16367,REC.FEBRJARY 20,1970 N39'30'26W 5a—� x'0831'. ��� 1 50 C (IN FEET) N39'48,2 1-41 1-7-_' 760.62 inch=200 1. 6,% y0C PROPOSED EASEMENTS 9��/cO OPO INDICATES AN UNRECORDED PRIVATE EASEMENT=0R ICE IC R/ ACCESS AND UTILITIES TC BE RESERVED 01 THE FINAL MAP- NdT3]56= •I�1 PRIVATE EASEMEN-FOR STORM DRAIN PURPOSES.TO BE RESERVED ON THE FINAL MAP. E PRIVATE EASEMEN FOR SANITARY SEWER PURPOSES.'0 BE —/ RESERVED ON FINA_MAP. C PRIJATE EASLME4-FOR EUEI MU]I�ICA"ION ACCESS AND ' MAINIENANCE I RPOSES. A �� EXISTING EASEMENTS &EASEMENT TO EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT FOR SEWER PURPOSES,PER INST.NO 1990-3578M REG SEPTEMBER 27,1990 2 EASEMENT FOR PJIEUC ROAD AND UTILITY PURPCSES PER PER INS'.NC.1988-93875,REC APRL8,1988 ANC RE-RECORDED 6. Q�l / \� PER INS`.INC-1988-99905,REC-APR 15,`9B8 ^ _s PEP \� H QJ/ LLJ Vl�. ENT l✓It7�Cfl(�,� Ek ;5 j PHASE 1:TR 36569.1 ry I U K /c / _ NO LOT LAND USE AREA (GROSS) NCTE v �'�� 1 �E >-X�18 I �/ 1 RESIDENTIAL 6.18 \ 2 RESIDENTIAL 4 17 - o fh / ,Q-/ 3 RESIDENTIAL 2.36 oo Z G �/ 4 RESIDENTIAL 2.89 r1' I /1f/L�/ ���0^ 5 RESIDENTIAL 7.24CIL - Ct 6 RESIDENTIAL 5.16 Q 7 OPEN SPACE 4.83 HOA ' a / CIL � 8 OPEN SPADE 29,37 CONSERJATION A RIDGE PARK DANE J.°9 PUBLIC R/W B I WESTERN BYPASS 2.37 PUBLIC R/W C ALTAIR V 0-72 PUBLIO R/W �\ A ry �� 0 RIDGE PARK ITA ORNE 0.04 PUBLIC R/W 6.18AC „\ LOT A" � A \ FUEL MODIFICATION-_y - 21 ZONE 0 0 0 8 0 ,, 29.37 AC 606' CONSERVATION AREA �' N75'''°'E 0 �,�' � LOT„pE1 l 34 — —> 2.36AC - i j 2 4.17AC "' F5 B i FUE'_MOD FICA-10N ZONE V �O' a7 Gj5 4 2.89 AC � 5 o5 7.24ACLu h % U % ^ o o z '1'ELI S0, N4.`.'31'4C'V ` L 380615' �7.9T ltg O 0 16 �5 6' Soi R 4> 447 s� 6 � 3 z� 1' W 9- 6� � � � KEY MAP 5.16 AC o O 6TH STREET 7' _ 62322' 9 n3 ��Ndd'^.}16E II GRAPHIC SCALE TRACT MAP 0° ° 50 100 200 300 �% ss TRACT MAP 1 so ° NO.36959-1 LOT I'D" 1 COROMELL TRAIL--, e 9, (SEE SHEET 4) (PRIVATE) I 1- Q' 1 �cb� �1 LOT„E„ R,w 4,S0 1 1 Z Q 4' r 6TH STREET O COROMELL TRAIL 1 (PUBLIC) 't 17 I 2 6s OPEN / 9r Nae SPACE 1 N.A. P. snNG EMA9 25EW4R EASEMENT `�` I� - N0.1989-422228 hoo N 7.07 AC d,� �o B PER q,1989 J' NOVEMBER 3 SCHOOL m Aco eI � SITE �� o 389 - 16 __- A 5 206-32' T FIRST STREE 3 -4; e 0.78AC uc) N44285YE s Q 1 �I R-57 C� 1 OPEN SPACE 5 5 co Q. '9 125 2p 3 n 139 Nl'1x?6 / 1 ' �+ NOTEI. _ �6 \ C�fSITE IMPROVEMEN'S GO FIRS:STREET O1 __- -( I V,f k� ' ANO COROME-;'HAIL WILL BE.,ONSTRJCTEC LV I 61 1 < %0. PER'R 36959 2 j U¢, 1 �. w► v III na i J _ 2 / '1s - 3 • GRAPHIC SCALE N I ( m 63'�0 2.37 ACJ' _ ' < 1 40 0 10 40 80 120 LL- = o 16' - 3.74 A C �B 1 -01, < 6 DETAIL 'B" � Inch IN FEET E�. � (� �I l i h=40 d. zlsJ. o` - 56 299 23' 1.63 A C p e5 �=9 W PROPOSED EASEMENTS PHASE 2:TR 36569.2 V �.J J� 1 �I INDICATES AN UNRECORDED PRIVATE EASEMENT FDR DUBUC LOT AREA o✓ (n _ +T\ A� LAND USE NOTE �,( �� _ r o. 1 ACCESS AND UTILITIES TO 9E RESERVED ON THE FINAL MAP. NG- (GROSS) ^c JJ I�5- iO B ,� 1 L-' RESERTE EAONMHE FOR STORM DRAIN PURPOSES.TO BE SCHOOL/RESIDENTAL 7.07 6 - o N r FINAL MAP- 2 RESIDENTIAL 2.37 1 li 5�, PRIVATE EASEMENT FOR MAINTENANCE AND ACCESS PURPOSES. 3 RESIDENTIAL 3.74 A B Q\ \\.\\ / / _ F 58 4 RESIDENTIAL 1.63 - �1 Z 1" \\ \ / / A9 H �EP VALE 5 RESIDENTIAL/MIXED USE 0.40 = C 1 RESERVEDASEMEON NTT FORAL PSANITAR"SEWER PURPOSES.TO BE II 5.04 AC\\ �v / 1d _ fi RESIDENTIAL_ 2.53 - J(�/YYp/i/li PRIVATE EASEMENT FOR WATER PURPOSES.TO BE RESERVED 9' (-ry(\/� \ \ \ 4 I B 1 ON FINAL MAP. 7 RESIDENTIA'A '..64 pI� \ \` 65 -- STREET H PUBLIC EASEMENT FOR ACCESS PURPOSES. _.8 RESIDENTIAL - �+' w 31'613 (PI IDLIC) \ \� � �I MAIN`A � 9 RESIDENTIAL 1.53 (PUBLIC)lJ/ \ _ O m 6C� \` + 10 RESIDENTIAL 1.30 I 'j RESIDENTIAL 1.80 30 A � i��']ri - �c 4 1 12 RESIDENTIAL 2.28 - U��, �/ o I ,, T��yZ-�-� 13 COMMUNfTY CENTER 0.30 HOA �I 19 5' m 1 12'' DID, o 20fi B 15' I 48"" r'I F ILI,J 14 RECREATION CENTER 1 75 HOA 135 S s vl ( U' I EXISTING EASEMENTS 15 OPEN SPACE 154 HDA 42 E7 o3 I h D,, Q'', 16 OPEN SPACE 078 HOA �I =20 ,\. �'i', AEASEMENT TO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY PER � J(< ', 1 17 OPEN SPACE 0.52 HOA z ✓ m z 5 Ory` J M ^ag 6fi 1 `` F C INST.NO 19EP 114969 REC.JUNE 9,1981 .->. o c N 2B 1 0 4�NO 19 7 TO 18 OPEN SPACE 4_60 MOA a .� c - .(('' w n _ F '� `� o, a n N ; PURPOSES FOR SEWER PIPELINES PER DEED NST. 19 PARK 5.04 PUBLIC PARK 100 l.l.l Z -- 4955,REC.NOVEMBER 12 198 ""-�-- '-'- 0.40 AC Lu' NO 1987 32 20 OPEN SPACE 0.59 HOA I ry aI 6 6 � � � I�ry �EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT FOR SEWER 21 OPEN SPACE 0-83 HDA I `l h/[ _ PER INST.N0.7990-188789,REC.MAY 23,1990 22 OPEN SPACE 1.63 HOA z�'. ATS 2.53 AC /� 23 OPEN SPACE 1.39 HCA NSI LIJ 11CL I ` 24 _ OPEN SPACE 1.80 HOA U O; 1.80 AC d � 1 I 25 OPEN SPACE 8.06 CONSERVATION �' A WESTERN BYPASS 5-13 PUBLIC R/W N ¢ - T�� �'I +^� B ALTAIR VISTA 0.87 PUBLIC R/W N I D O P 1 r � 1 ALTAIR VISTA 217 PRIVATE R/W � c O`' '�" /�� 1.84 A ''U 1 GRDME'L TRAIL 2.73 PRIVATE R/W jw S c 1fi' a Q- 4 Q m I E COROMELL TRAIL 0.40 PUBLIC R/W 1 z 0 7 /� e M ml J I F A"STREE 0.91 PRIVATE R/W 09T 1.64 AC 3A R 00 A5 6V0 P 1 1�in 30 Lu T _ O e vT ti� �o Lu f-< 1 4 W CL v 12 a r� SSB B 9 N `� 2 o� co _� 2.28AC � w 10 1.53 AC i ° 0.59 AC / m l w Q' S6 1.30 AC 0 L OPEN SPACE ts �I. 5P 1T I.56. 262 1 co o n �i -� �2 M o 5fi .. IH2' Js 66�' I � r- O o F 58 _ M m 1 17 1 0.83 AC OPEN SPACE Nm m 6 q� _ o I 0.52 AC 00 a 21 3 - 1 C H=IDD OPENsogC� - I 1 - OPEN SPACE KEY MAP �� 6B. B ` - SEE DETAIL" " i GRAPHIC SCALE _ 1W o 50 loo 200 300 's-hf 51 1E1 I, 1 FIRST STREET TRACT MAP TRACT MAP NO.36959-2 PHASE 3:TR 36569.3 PROPOSED EASEMENTS (SEE SHEET 5) LOT OLAND USE TGREA NOTE a INDICATES AN UNRECORDED PRIVATE EASEMEN FOR PUBLIC i ACCESS AND UTILITIES TO BE RESERVED ON T�E FNAL MAI _ - RESIDENTA_ 255 PRIVATE EASEMENT FOR S'0PM DRAIN PURPOSES.TO 9E 6 162 2 RESIDENTA_ 2.32 - RESERVED ON THE FINAL MAP. 1 RIB 21'37 59 3 PRIVAll IASIMENI LOP MAINJINAN(E AND ALC- URIOSES >. w � IL 0.83 AC OPEN SPACE 22 >634C - /'1 - TARY SEWER PURPOSES TO BE _ l� _ _ _ -_ _—__ SERVED ----- - O�oF/V 5 2;2 — . SP 7 RES DEMA- I-5RESIDENTIA- 2.'5 i r I PRIVATE EASEMENT FOR SAN � LJ REON FINAL MAP 17 - � PRIVATE EASEMENT FOR WAT=R PURPO,.S 10 HE RESERVED NI d 165 M""'� k=68 6 RESIDENTA_ 261 - ON FINAL MAP. L 54 o, k-68 58-II4 ��� 9 RESIDENTIAL 142 El PUBLICEASEMENT FOR ACCESS PURPOSES L E�2. - �� 10 RESIDENTIAL 4.51 - - L R 9 R s - �_ i RESIDENTIAL 452 2.. 19 \;. - 12 OPEN SPACE 540 HOA 12 OPEN SPACE 66 DA EXISTING EASEMENTS ►- 2.55 AC 1.96 AC OTT'"E' I PARK CEO HOA R-12„ e_ U - ,., y --a,T, of 15 OPEN SPACE 074 HOA �EASEMENT TO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA OAS COMPANY PER (y� _ n� it -� _16 _OPEN SPACE - -052 HOA INST NO J L-26 ^ Q �a5c J5T' 1 V ti � --4422 0632" - _._ _ — AEASEM NT PI JUNE 19 1981 17 PARK C 25 - HOA -- '981 114969 RE R-2600 'E 2 18 OPEN SPACE C 38 HOA T FOR SEWER PIPE IVES ER DEED INS'_ I 32494' REC.NOVEMBER 12 1967 MI 19 OPEN SPACE 7 64 HOA ADEASEMEN FOR SEWER PIPELINES PER DEED,INS' 403' 20 OPEN SPACE 8.3D CONSERVATION A WESTERN BYPASS 4.70 PUBLIC R/W NO.1987-324947,REC.NOVEMBER 12,1987 = / B AL7AIP VISTA 242 PRNATE R/W Q s H 1 2 451 Q �, , CHLINE C '9.STREET N_ 43 PRNATE R/W EASEMENT FOR SEWER PIPELINES PER DEET,INST / MAT NG.1987-324951,REC.NOVEMBER 12,1987 W 4 , -SEE LEFT D '9'STREET N. 036 PUBLIC R/W QEASEMENT FOR SEWER PIPELINES PER DEED,INST. 64' N0.1987-324955,REC.NOVEMBER 12,1987 o Q 2.32 AC - 2.15 AC L "� 0' 22 C1' H 12 10 I � I U Q at 2a'�26 -- w1 0 0 =196 R-so N 200 JS ) 4 ,25\ co 56 63 6 34 D' a< / HLINE SEE LEFT o I oz 4 - BgSPq-E� 1 AC �� MAT ILLC c x R 200 D8 C 5 0.74 ,, 34" R=SO 052q f �OPENACECy C z 71 O7 V� O 1 5Lu DO U z 4 4U � � Q �. 8 5 I v z �� w. 2.51 AC ' 1.51 AC �5G p� �� 6' �, _ 4.5�AC QJ � U), ko — I''I A O /� rsr Q ' 6 �S.ED 03 \� AS. 'j�P 4 PUJOL STREET OFFS TE R/w DEC CATION PER �(/� _ TR 36568 16' R=268' 6 c O 0 fl =2t 1.23 AC / ° 6 DG' v 1.42 AC / `R,24 �J� oo�m - LOT"D"8 STREET N. Q I (PUBLIC) 'T 17 / 7 �n �, %1 18 0.25AC---- �. CIO 56' 1.17AC Q,'�i� �° ' �� '� 0.38AC PAR ^ I 22 _ ; 9J 00� 9 �O y 6615°'e � it jO B2' e4 \ h 6,i" =2v' `0 v TRACT MAP CL 10 NO.36959 m 4.51 ACz_ (SEE SHEET 7) ro{;uj u mGRAPHIC SCALE ^^II 100 o w loo 20D 300 Nrl ' 06' Ji o I 0 IN FEET HLI E RIGHT I J ,a. MAIC NE-SE'SD' 64' I , "I I mm=1W n. RI °° B B I I KEY MAP I — MATCHLINE-SEE RIGHT PROPOSED EASEMENTS PHASE 4:TR 36569 C' ACCESS AND UTILITIES i0 BE RESERVED ON THE FINAL NAP -LCT- AREA \ o . LOT"DpUBL PUBLIC N. e C IND L RTES AN UNRECORDEC PRIVATE EASEMENT TOR PJB IC NO LAND USE (GROSS; NOTE .t� \\ f q 0 1 ELEMENTAL -- 2 5C - PRIVATE EASEMEN FOR STDRM DRAIN PURFOSES TO BE _ Oy "y RESERVED ON THE FINAL MAP. 2 RESIDENTIAL 4 55 - .p l/ 0.3 . 6 A INDATTO AN UNRECORDED PERMANENT EASEMEN FOR 3 CIVIC '613 - �rA ACCESS AND PUBLIC JULIT ED'0 BE RESERVED FROM MWD. 031G 9 ?\ a C RrvAiE FasEMry FOR ro 4 opo SPACE HOA �/ 1 �� Fl MODIFICAPON ACCESS AND 5 OPEN SPACE 012 C STREET ����{ MAINT4NANCE °LR°CSES. �`. l/ 6 OPEN SPACE 042 HOA �. cFFr OPEN space 426-- NS ,26 C� (PUBLIC) 8 OPEN SPACE 4 23 HOA 9 OPEN SPACE 3463 CONSERVATION a \ 2 EXISTING EASEMENTS V "` 4 — v� 10 OPEN SPACE z61 coNSErNAnoN3- �EASEMENT TO SOJ-HERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY PER A WESTERN BYPASS 2.87 PUBLIC R/W ,� �I 0.31 AC S T INST.N0.1981-'14969,REC.JUNE 19,'981 B "B"STREET S. C.31 PUBLIC R/W nn, R?.R o C "C"STREE7 0.70 PUBLIC R/W LOT A 8 3 �,' `"., 9 EASEMENT FOR SEWER PIPELINES PER DEED, NOT NO 1987 32494' W PURPOSES.PER..NST.NO.'990-18879 1987 AND 1987-324947,REC NOVEMBER 12 34.63 AC ;; 5 I .1 4 MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT EOR SEWER c I ;I 6s" I _ \ \ D.REC MAY 23.799D w I CONSERVATION AREA 11 0.12 AC QEASEMENT TO EASTERN AEASEMENT TO RANCHO GAL'IORNIA WATER DISTRICT FOR PIPEIINF PURPOSES,PER NST NO.2001-505D14,REC OCTOBER 17.2001 .1 \OPEN SPACE 6 A//�� NESTPRN FfYVAS CORRJOn TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT TO RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER MWD EASEMENT AREAS OFF-- DISTRICT, f R/R 7E CATION ,jI PUBLIC DISTRICT,PER INST.NO 2001-505018,REC OCTOBER 17.2001 LOT AREA LOT 'B° �PER PW 06-04 r (PUBLIC) l/) 4C �I 0.42 AC LAND USE �ILILE ti q EASEMENT TO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON PER No. (GROSS) /' QII40 IOPEN SPACE INST.N0.1977-113639,REC.JUNE 20.1977 D "C"STREET 029 PW _ - E "B"STREE'S. 0.48 PUBLIC R/W Z ml 0 16.13 AC \ 88 I m SEE DETAIL' 1 TRACT MAP 40 20 G. GRAPHIC SCALE 8d 40' 0 80 120 z 16 NO.36959-3 0l IGD' > (SEE SHEET 6) 1 b flIN FEETDETAIL °C" I ` I I o nl - 15� - 1 h )- = 40' 51� 5 LOT„E„ 0.12 AC44/ W r OPEN SPACE yl Lu G (PUBLIC) cl) 111 I 261. / U Q �� I� ca C,4 z — \ Eli 1 _\1C H,6 60 o I r s � o O ` O m c� o 9' U 1 ZO o r l LOT 310 P I a� Q7 O GRAPHIC SCALE C\; 40 o��� � 40 0 20 +a w 120 N40'S4'S1". C) 4b DETAIL "D" IN FEET �0 1 inch=40 ry.29 9 57 4.55 AC � �` 34.63AC i 1P �X�� /� i CONSERVATION AREA 0 h ti o 1 Y h _ 2.50 AC LOT"B" FUEL G MODIt(CATION ZONE �� o 0 6p `C 4-45C' LOT NDN LOT,FE1F 6, 5/ Co °o SEE DETAIL"C" Mq�CN�1 N.A.P. co J/ ' __ � GRAPHIC SCALE GRAPHIC 5010 50 100 200 300 SCALE R R1GlyT m Q KEY MAP �,. I 100 0 100 0 sD IDD 200 300 �• N6an3R•L v.���._ � IIMFFFrI ATTACHMENT 10C TTM 36959 CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN CONCEPTUAL GRADING - EXHIBIT A .- TR 36959-1, 36959-2, 36959-3 & 36959;---.tll CITY OF TEMECULA ' SHEET31 t WESTERN BYPASS CORRIDOR IPUBLn SITE l� .,. l'o..v N 1'.',u'R.�I N.r�t:8c� cc i �rA_. f• TRACT MAP v( SHEET36959•t YICINITf MAP .,`-" —�_. .) ..,...«.•w., ' .--TRAIL j�VRIVaTEj ' SHEET 51'1 COROMELL W6TBaN BYPASS OMMJII R « 11 1 emol.4 . �_..•�s.Y...f._�'u ( 1 � ..� t�` � 1 -�.— ..a a-," ____-_'_' Tor:�c aoe ... ..c 1 r.r._-�-_!`.c� , �__-•� �=^�-t I��Ti�.-•-� ,r i 1 ! - - 1,;_J - - --._ e.....:. ... .a.+..0.,. IITRAC7 MAP �� ° 1 1 7 •° NO 36858-2 r , - _8•.-_..�_„y7___- -- -- ^ SHEETEI x :.. , COROMELt TRAILlp RIYATEJ 1 r.nv.... � n r a ,.,.. ,vw� •"x i >. 1 1 ........,., T T ".>,� t t • i YINOBNT MOIIA04 ISYSUBI 4avep ><.•«�:4ir'".r-- �—nZ.rsfr"�6:ssra.--t ..ee.,=• -ssrzr:*-' 1 I —•— ” ----- --a..m.,, ,... y\ ,__lra"F: 3"-_,_�yr_ `•r�T`-�=1a-•r,«.-r+� ,��``r"^'�1" 1 ;z � «'_ .�\�.j.1 �` '�.... �, .ss x......-,.. �. ~'... .r-„..'• SHEET 11 y ficec S-ccA-_ t A'l-. �{ V AITAIR VITA CUIVERT[MUVATE) I 1 , #-___ .._•_,T� _: ALTAIR YbTAB'A•STRB tlIRIVATBl A 5TUEE1 81110CE IVRIVATEI r-1•-�_ +---1 t UTILITIES 1 I � t l RIOGE PAaR OT%&IP=UQ w•'v,�,.:e'.�.'�',.e' .. ..•...; ,.a �.^ 1 L+ '•' t""">sA:S�.•LTS0.a'EB�' I SHEET 81 I �_---I TRACT MAP (. 1. �•p 369543 •r u..` r A-�• - `A11.n•r.” ",Iw. «.n 1 L ` ;ti -_ ..r..J APPLICANT OWNER ALTrA��M YpT�DWUCI 7-�fTReR IL 1� ^H^STREET N (PRIVATE] SHEETS urro x re '9 i .ro I> L TRACT MAP 1 NO 36959 ASSESSORS PARCEL MUNUMBNESS •O•iTaEETA TST11Ett B.^ LIG ALTAIR VISTA•~ONE•W0.V IPRRIATE) I , '• _� ! ( +o-m-x.,.�ao-�w-..n.e�.ea uo-m. we.,moi•ueaan, - I 1 Ysmr,l .Arn.e�T�r1_s,T.,".A vf.%1.. „ s�-�''•s^'��w'w SHEET IOC ` I SOURCE OF AERIAL TOPOGRAPHY ewn I�—�+n�"•v A. �.:.� .n—TTBFT--„�•".'—__`, 1-�- E I ✓�-«.41 it - .i. ' i-.'p �`r II 1 - - '� --••l+ FARTN910RR YYANTRId 1=11 11 s3f �'•:„�--ter. —•,r+� { 1 / { ..a._� r , r •'nr -'" SHEET 1�j , I ,.l��wKl u•'.•.o tM', G �o•�i - L, / AM"MC.CAIEu a , 1 ♦,x e w "S"STIIEET N IPUBUC) ,. +..' sT.". '_._•,«a, "n ,.v«r.. l__ / j�j� ��� nasr aeer_vul suer ca, a�r�Eu�Ti•R�a�n•#P�uB�� L R— � -,J C'T"' iSR, K.fJRNMI(W c N,EVATOR -b.i. E.i-. iEF.,j CITY OF TEMECULA 5 - - CONCEPTUAL GRADING-EXHIBIT A TTM NO.36959.1,36959.2,36959-3&36959 it- 13 VILLAGE MAP PHASING IM► L1���� LEGAL DESCRIPTION T1Yor 6l AP ,! No.asswi I 1 \ oPA �! ? J TRICT MAP J NO.36959.1 \\ { 1 NORTH PHASE \ 1 1 \ \ � 1 LEGEND 1 1 c! {h D I TIUCT MAP 3 # TRACT MAP 1 NO.766664 j l�Plr - NO.36966.2 CENTRAL PURSE f � TRACT YAP '. ._r 2bit:L IR 1 TRACT MNO. IM AP ~_� PHASING "Urm►NKSF 1 NO.]6069.'1 I `/ - ___ - -_-'w—,. I,1 1 '• / 1 � / I { 1 ` 1 I i i1 1 I 1 TRACT MAP 1 i 1 1 I TRACT MAP NO.76666 �` 1 NO,36959 CIVIC PHA56 I 1 • t Al. .. :. �. CITY OF TEMECULA 1 "''"'wf°" CONCEPTUAL GRADING-EXHIBIT A TTM NO.36959-1,36959-21 36959.3&36959 :. 13 ; w.can caysrax*ioN r OPEN SPACE (CONSERVAVON) tt AW cr �'. 6,18 AC �+ E � s �I �'- , \ .gyp\ •'.���i SEE SHEE' NOTE:SEE SECTIONS ON SHEET 12 AND 13 CITY OF TEMECULA CONCEPTUAL GRADING•EXHIBIT A TTM NO.36959.1 13 „ SEE SHEEN3 V '.�. � fie• i•::” •�� P'It.. 6.f8AC OPEN SPACE T 2.36AC riaC t \ 2.89AC -. OPEN SPACE F' S i6-AC BTH STREET NOTE:SEE SECTIONS ON SHEET 12 G J SEESHEET5 '^°'•• CITY OF TEMECULA --r—r—,- � _,., •E, 11'1'p .... CONCEPTUAL GRADING•EXHIBIT A TTM NO.36959.1 SEESHEE-4 v F25 F OPEN SPACE 07 (CONSERVARON) i 1 { r It ,1.�_ 1• �,,,.,.�,. ,+' 1, .... '».w.W„:w�, �_,.._ �... - -=' fWAL 075A SCNOM SITE _ s i K o g .. 237AC 3 74AC 1 t ! 1 i s�--`, a � •.a , \ '' 763 AC 1 r ` ��•`� s. `. us�.i�aeua NOTE'.SEE SECTIONS ON SHEET 12.AND 13 SEE SHEET .a�ora F CITY OF TEMECULA S n .. -. ,. i CONCEPTUAL GRADING-EXHIBIT A TTM NO.36959.2 13 t SEE SHEET 5 all 04 AC NN 1. ,t �, �. WA 7� .\ OPEN SPA 4OAC �� ` z 53 AC x 1 I tl m t 1 j 1 I r 8044 r.53AC 1 \ � I 1 \ r bAC E 0AC X 16 1 w` '; 51 - --052A C IN 1' < SEE Der^`A'�\ FIRST giREET SEE SHEET 7 ' omarmle oc�u ou.narc:c.:-� ' DETAIL"A" NOTE SEE SECTIONS ON SHEET 12 AND 13 _.._— CITY OF TEMECULA ('o' 0 1 CONCEPTUAL GRADING-EXHIBIT A ' E --~ _- TTM NO.36959.2 ✓ 13 t •spr syl eG.:rm:cl+oti SEE SHEET& .I a A� < 198 AC , I k i TMr i OBOAC SEE DETAIL.F.. 1s i 1 2.32Ac 1 OPEN SPACE ' (CONSERVATION) � ��-. � � — - !1' _ � if 12 � I 2.51 AC ` t a 7.51 Ac r gi t� p �T 142AC'• '-� L23 AC J��' I1 117AC jury* NOTE SEE SECTIONS ON SHEET 13 SEE SHEET 8 CITY OF TEMECULA •`' '`"' CONCEPTUAL GRADING-EXHIBIT A .-- ..:.. .:...:...�_^___. TTM NO.36959.3 SEE SHEET? , A P'C •1S 1.73Ap U ` �Y r�.')✓ /�`'a. 1 f t IIrAC ; i ao OPEN SPACE (CONSERVATION) r y ti� Il •'R.� MA-C-LINE,SEE LEFT 110 /STAG v s �y.�T`'- .f• •`�'r• Nl! / SEE SHEE'9 9 � its M allyrle'cui \`\1•`i:i`C.•... 1 C `• _._. 1 z MATCHLINE SEE RIGHT NOTE:SEE SECT IONS ON SHEET 13 CITY OF TEMECUTA - ;" CONCEPTUAL GRADING-EXHIBIT A ,�_'~ � TTM NO.36959-3 SEE SHEE-5 i r �•� �"•� ��� .rel � ' � I N:� '� { � a XJ i r•hne w•u �\ t DETAIL"B" ' r ' OPEN SPACE r 2 l I �_ f asoAc rr`r.. au.xm•e..e I `�� COJ'0'_ �^?•-� NA.P. NOTE.SEE SECTIONS ON SHEET 13 SEE SHEET 10 -y ''X �� ® - CITY OF TEMECULA CONCEPTUAL GRADING-EXHIBIT A TTM NO.96959 Yr- LOT Z' NAP 9 4 OPEN SPACE 4 l i—SEE DEML V w 9 OPEN SPACE 'i .a.d �; r'' w cc I * 16A C 9REE ST EET S IPUBL!C) 0 'LOT-C?I I 34.6AC OPEN SPACE0 C ACE (CONSERVATION) S .4EO ro,�', DLTAIL G NOTE SEE SECTIONS ON SHEET 13 SEE SHEET I CITY OF TEMECULA CONCEPTUAL GRADING-EXHIBIT A 10 TTM NO.36959 l? SEE SHEE(1U 1 � y 3463AC 261 AC ! g OPENSPACE OPENSPACE j 1 t' XONSERVAPONI (CONSERVATION) t I 1 � 1 1< 1 lv '1 1 1 � J r 7 W 1 � J ,e 1 �J 1 4 (eel IMp! YBJCi11.U1K Net $BFVATpN_JI_ XW 4e+n Or R.�o(n. .n�n;xx� CITY OF TEMECULA - CONCEPTUAL GRADING•EXHIBIT A TTM NO.36959 13 —'sacs rrts--- i 1.fM1.• .,�w.. GOMK.N.tMv.' � t I MrV T N M IBMawl; 1 ;,--T4{T.aW.F+,- yui.iu �D �.�. , •_, qw 14 ,.. Aft�N- secs«oa °1'"i ..F•,:>.�- wnp"i oea os � >nn9 ter �_—J WInp SECTION K-K _,. •• �r t CITY 2 G ! � CONCEPTUAL GRADING ADDING-EXHIBIT A � •.. TTM NO.36959.1,36959.2,36959.3&36959 1,3 o- Z-" ............... WL SacTom Sao Z-x a 8!4nwv.v TI 1. t 124 w VI-V ........... lmww,w -1-2 sac"ON 0.0 t.Afrin rs.r T TVPWAL DIESILTING MAIRM SaCTION rM"L SWETSIMOM BAUM SQL CITY OF TEMECULA 13 CONCEPTUAL GRADING-EXHIBIT A TTM NO.36959.1,36959-2,36959-3&36959 ATTACHMENT 10D CONSTRUCTION PHASING AND IMPROVEMENTS EXHIBIT ALTAI R PROJECT PHASING - EXHIBIT B Updated: 03/15/2016 FIVE PRIMARY PHASES - BASED ON GRADING r Civic Phase South Phase Central Phase North Phase • Aw for 14, 74 arm 4 , { s- ' 1 , J y L . t Western Bypass Bridge Phase r " x k n TOTAL PROJECT • t Civic Phaseh Phase ase Central Phase North Phase Units/Village nits/Village Cumulative Units Units/Village Cumulative Units Units/Village Cumulative Units Cumulative Units G 130 Units 1,750 Units D 160 Units 1,325 Units C-N 225 Units 725 Units A 280 Units 280 Units 130 Units E 115 Units 1,440 Units C-5 440 Units 1,165 Units B 220 Units 500 Units F 180 Units 1,620 Units 665 Units 500 Units 455 Units Y imvT . Y �u�U� m� jjjj 4 .. r Y - CS �. o n ; m • .y ' . w ' at , 1,i �''1 + - fir- `�!► s ` .i s , t} fr $ f -rr. , ♦ ,'.' t; +4 -"„�4^a..�.t�4,ir1� . �, a s .-..i NORTH PHASE — Prior to 1St Building Permit North Phase rough graded ` Ridge Park Drive improvements rM, including "T" intersection. Altair Vista phase 1 Western Bypass phase 1 Vincent Moraga widening from Ridge Park Dr to Rancho Calif Rd (except east lanes between Felix Valdez & Rancho Calif Rd)* �w East Lanes to build-out width ' between Felix Valdez & Rancho ' J s M f Calif Road Left turn lane on Rancho Cal , �t"IN i Y "4 -..; . • .. Vyh 9„1f h R � tip '_�, a Four-way stop at First Street and 4 Pujol Street 4 North Phase Offsite Sewer All intersection improvements and W ,_�.4-: t _ r �- . _ aur_. signal relocations are complete.* * Master Developer shall put forth a good faith effort to acquire the ROW needed along _At Vincent Moraga. If unsuccessful in the ROW acquisition after several attempts,then the City shall initiate eminent domain proceedings as necessary. These improvements shall Yellow Highlight: Identifies be complete prior to the earlier of, i) issuance of the 350th building permit for the improvements being constructed project, or ii) issuance of the 1st building permit for the Central Phase. earlier than in previous submittal. CENTRAL PHASE — Prior to 1st Building Permit Central Phase rough graded Altair Vista phase 2 ' "A" Street phase 1 (secondary access provided by neighborhood internal streets) vIo o__ la � 1 Levant Trail connects Altair Vista `\ 1 � f ' to First Street �^ .� .. � . .. _ -^-�" Cn r DG trail at Village B toe of slope p` s� V y y" Central Phase Offsite Sewer ..;,, e r ,•- —+ - ` ;- . its a Signal Improvements at First Street and Pujol Street ► _ r r y � r T ?4 d ` . ... a�♦ �:._ �+ �. ; L �� � - -�4 �N �Y� - rF-1.epi xyy Yellow Arrows l>: Interim pedestrian access to �� '" "'` Yellow Highlight: Identifies Old Town will occur from the east side of the improvements being constructed Western Bypass, along the base of the Village B earlier than in previous submittal. pad, to Pujol St. and across the Main St. Bridge. CENTRAL PHASE — Prior to Building Permits in Village C, south of the park Village C Park phase 2— 'Soft' `� . ., Recreation Center (west budding) or Landscape. =.Y Community Center (east building) r , ! t C of O to be obtained prior to the Altair Vista phase 3 t: "- � "� earlier of, i) 950th building permit for the project, or ii) 1St building "A" Street phase 2 and vehicular permit for the South Phase. bridge Western Bypass phase 2 (2 lanes ' constructed; ultimate NB), parallel Class 1 Bikeway* Western Bypass Bridge* ' School o Q It All % Yu k Main Street transition,grand stairway and Village C Park PH 1 R 4 .� (ADA access provided to `A' Street) . . `•4•�" �' '"-- �� " _ E �; �`` " fr # Start: Construction of the WBC Bridge or grading of the South Phase to complete tht � WBC connection shall start prior to the 700th building permit (40%) for the project. _. � 4Y; �; t`� ►" '!�A Ell Complete: The WBC Road and Bridge improvements shall be constructed prior to the tat earlier of, i) issuance of the 950th building permit for the project (54%), or ii) issuance of the 1St building permit for the South Phase. Yellow Highlight: Identifies improvements being constructed If the Civic Phase grading has not yet commenced, the City shall provide the Master earlier than in previous submittal. Developer with the ability to stock pile dirt onto the Civic Site. SOUTH PHASE — Prior to 1St Building Permit Village C Park phase 2—'Hard' ., �,»• Landscape. a South Phase rough graded Altair Vista phase 4 Signal improvements at Western "B" Street North connects to L Bypass and Altair Vista Western Bypass and Pujol Street Western Bypass phase 2 (2 lanes constructed; ultimate NB) and parallel Class 1 Bikeway* .r. R Western Bypass Bridge* F Fch00 +r o ' a - t f z, . w y cir v 'E 77, ♦ C ♦t _ ry9. �.•+i'kba * Start: Construction of the WBC Bridge or grading of the South Phase to complete the l � b WBC connection shall start prior to the 700th building permit (40%) for the project. ' ` $' � '/+` tf' ►' _ "~ Complete: The WBC Road and Bridge improvements shall be constructed prior to the Ayr earlier of, i) issuance of the 950th building permit for the project (54%), or ii) issuance of the 1St building permit for the South Phase. Yellow Highlight: Identifies improvements being constructed If the Civic Phase grading has not yet commenced, the City shall provide the Master earlier than in previous submittal. Developer with the ability to stock pile dirt onto the Civic Site. SOUTH PHASE — Prior to 3001h Building Permit Village D Park Y • 3. Village E/F Park .17 : Y� •f E a,, F •���u s ✓✓VIII •, ,. �...�„�'t`, ,:� it yy, ,ti;� � x>. -= "'•-,. `M� � v��, —i ,� + h`ei`r• ` , .44 J blow ' a'- 5. ... -,� � . t • ." �� � �. .,�,� � � "moi X'" y� � �. q � ;'M'♦ .�� >r+a� L `�r ,� ) +µ-'.ms d 4� • ri ft i Yellow Highlight: Identifies improvements being constructed earlier than in previous submittal. CIVIC PHASE — Prior to 1St Building Permit Civic Phase rough graded - Signal improvements at Western Recreation Center (west building) or w. �`to �•,,.. Bypass and "B" Street Community Center(east building), C "B" Street South of O for whichever building has Western Bypass phase 3, 2 SB not yet been constructed lanes constructed "C" Street Civic Phase Offsite Sewer a f t- COMc� `.-- F ScI .0 #1d1' w . 4 t• 4 .ry a l g� y. , .h •r. Via. i ' r� _ _ R � 4o* a [ i 104. ' l►wy�a''S�' • s �,, zr "t� y 2 Yellow Highlight: Identifies improvements being constructed earlier than in previous submittal. J m ji F 4 4 �• y fy a » s . _r.n 00 r M i a: � �s 0 R► $, rlC IKf r. �ui , t LL. 7 Aa s . \ 4:. = y ' Y .X ,•'i _f �as .��. � 1'� ♦ q w v' a r� TIMING OF CIVIC PHASE DELIVERY & WESTERN BYPASS BRIDGE 6 „ t r, , � t w# n !Ar- :. 'f •k.11 Due to traffic volumes, the Western Bypass Bridge will need to be installed '' for !" �-a prior to a building permit being issued the Civic Site. If the Civic Phase f• z is accelerated then so will construction of the Western Bypass Bridge as well as the connection to Pujol Street. '` Yellow Highlight: Identifies improvements being constructed earlier than in previous submittal. ATTACHMENT 10E DEVELOPER RESPONSIBILITY MAP ---------------- -- - -- / _= TR 36959 3 / TR 36959-3 • ` — ' 2 — -—-- — — — — — 1 TR 36959-2 ` Ip / 9 8 2 13 11 SCHOOL 3 5 5 PARK 7 �� a I PARK _.� 2 q 3 6 + S � 86 9 \ 3 --- — —-- — -- — — -- — I I .. I I SLOPES: ® MASTER DEVELOPER CONSTRUCTED,MASTER HOA MAINTAINED ! MASTER DEVELOPER CONSTRUCTED, DEEDED TO GUEST BUILDER,MASTER HOA MAINTAINED MASTER DEVELOPER ROAD FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS, DEEDED TOTHE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR MAINTENANCE MASTER DEVELOPER CONSTRUCTED, DEEDED TO GUEST BUILDER,SUB HOA MAINTAINED MASTER DEVELOPER CONSTRUCTED PEDESTRIAN CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS,MASTER HOA MAINTAINED ROADS: MASTER DEVELOPER PARK IMPROVEMENTS, DEEDED TO THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR MAINTENANCE PRIVATE ROADS: ® MASTER DEVELOPER PARK IMPROVEMENTS, EASEMENT GRANTEDTO THE CITY OF TEMECULA MASTER DEVELOPER RESPONSIBLE FOR CURB TO CURB STREET IMPROVEMENTS, FOR MAINTENANCE MASTER HOA MAINTAINED _ MASTER DEVELOPER PARK IMPROVEMENTS ON LAND OWNED AND MAINTAINED BY _ PUBLIC ROADS: THE CITY OF TEMECULA MASTER DEVELOPER RESPONSIBLE FOR CURB TO CURB STREET IMPROVEMENTS, CITY OF TEMECULA MAINTAINED MASTER DEVELOPER PARK IMPROVEMENTS,MASTER HOA MAINTAINED _ MASTER DEVELOPER RECREATION CENTER,MASTER HOA MAINTAINED GUEST BUILDER CONSTRUCTED,SUB HOA—MAINTAINED `� DEVELOPER RESPONSIBILITY MAP of )',o �•r carrierjohnson + CULTUR3 COMPLETELY TEMECULA.