Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
032718 CC Agenda
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (951) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II] AGENDA TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA MARCH 27, 2018 — 7:00 PM CLOSED SESSION Pursuant to Government Code Section 54953(b) Mayor Pro Tempore Mike Naggar will be teleconferencing in only for the Closed Session portion of the March 27, 2018 City Council meeting from the following location: 445 South D Street, Perris, California 92570 At approximately 9:45 P.M., the City Council will determine which of the remaining agenda items can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00 P.M. and may continue all other items on which additional time is required until a future meeting. All meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 P.M. 5:30 PM - The City Council will convene in Closed Session in the Canyons Conference Room on the third floor of the Temecula City Hall concerning the following matters: CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — POTENTIAL LITIGATION. The City Council will meet in closed session with the City Attorney pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(4) with respect to one matter of potential litigation. A point has been reached where, in the opinion of the City Attorney, based on existing facts and circumstances, there is a significant exposure to litigation involving the City. Based on existing facts and circumstances, the City Council will decide whether to initiate litigation. Next in Order: Ordinance: 18-07 Resolution: 18-21 CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Matt Rahn Prelude Music: Ally Negulescu Invocation: Pastor William Rench of Calvary Baptist Church Flag Salute: Council Member Jeff Comerchero ROLL CALL: Comerchero, Edwards, Naggar, Stewart, Rahn 1 PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS Presentation of Arbor Day Proclamation Presentation of Certificates of Welcome to Dignitaries from Sister City Leidschendam- Voorburg PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 30 minutes is provided for members of the public to address the City Council on items that appear within the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda. Each speaker is limited to three minutes. If the speaker chooses to address the City Council on an item listed on the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda, a Request to Speak form may be filled out and filed with the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing Public Comments and the Consent Calendar. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the agenda, a Request to Speak form may be filed with the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Each speaker is limited to five minutes. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made at this time. A total, not to exceed, 10 minutes will be devoted to these reports. CONSENT CALENDAR NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless Members of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. 1 Waive Reading of Standard Ordinances and Resolutions RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 That the City Council waive the reading of the text of all standard ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda except as specifically required by the Government Code. 2 Approve the Action Minutes of March 13, 2018 RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 That the City Council approve the City Council and Joint Meeting of the City Council/Community Services Commission action minutes of March 13, 2018. 3 Approve the List of Demands RECOMMENDATION: 2 3.1 That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 18- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A 4 Approve the City Treasurer's Report as of January 31, 2018 RECOMMENDATION 4.1 That the City Council approve and file the City Treasurer's Report as of January 31, 2018. 5 Approve an Agreement with Raceway Ford, Inc. for the Purchase of Four (4) 2018 4X4 Ford Escapes RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 That the City Council approve an Agreement with Raceway Ford, Inc., in the amount of $103,716, for the purchase of four (4) 2018 4X4 Ford Escapes. 6 Approve the Second Amendment to the Agreement with Proactive Fire Design and Consulting, Inc. for Fire Department Plan Review Service RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 That the City Council approve the Second Amendment to the Agreement with Proactive Fire Design and Consulting, Inc., in the amount of $15,000, for Fiscal Year 2017-18 for Fire Department Plan Review Service. 7 Approve a Purchase and Installation Agreement with Canon Solutions America, Inc. for the Replacement of High Volume Copy Machines RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 That the City Council approve a Purchase and Installation Agreement with Canon Solutions America, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $51,968.37, for the replacement of high volume copiers within the Support Services Division of the Information Technology and Support Services Department (ITSS). 8 Approve an Agreement with Raceway Ford, Inc. for the Purchase of a Ford F-550XL Super Duty Truck RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 That the City Council approve an Agreement with Raceway Ford, Inc., in the amount of $120,910.43, for the purchase of a Ford F-550XL Super Duty Chassis Cab and Utility Bed with Equipment. 3 9 Award a Construction Contract to PTM General Engineering Services, Inc. for the Traffic Signal Installation — Redhawk Parkway/Vail Ranch Parkway at El Chimisal Road/Tehachapi Pass, PW15-09 RECOMMENDATION: 9.1 Award a Construction Contract to PTM General Engineering Services, Inc., in the amount of $299,099, for the Traffic Signal Installation — Redhawk Parkway/ Vail Ranch Parkway at El Chimisal Road/Tehachapi Pass, PW15-09; 9.2 Authorize the City Manager to approve Contract Change Orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $29,909.90, which is equal to 10% of the contract amount; 9.3 Make a finding that the Traffic Signal Installation — Redhawk Parkway/Vail Ranch Parkway at El Chimisal Road/Tehachapi Pass project is exempt from Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) fees. 10 Adopt a Resolution and a Mitigated Negative Declaration, Approve the Plans and Specifications, and Authorize Solicitation of Construction Bids for Pechanga Parkway Widening, PW15-14 RECOMMENDATION: 10.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 18- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE PECHANGA PARKWAY WIDENING PROJECT (PW15-14) AND APPROVING THE PROJECT 10.2 Approve the Plans and Specifications, and Authorize the Department of Public Works to Solicit Construction Bids for the Pechanga Parkway Widening, PW15-14. 11 Approve the Plans and Specifications, and Authorize Solicitation of Construction Bids for Butterfield Stage Road — Phase III, PW15-11 RECOMMENDATION: 11.1 That the City Council approve the Plans and Specifications, and authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit construction bids for Butterfield Stage Road — Phase III, PW15-11. ******************** RECESS CITY COUNCIL MEETING TO SCHEDULED MEETINGS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT, THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, THE TEMECULA HOUSING AUTHORITY, AND THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY ******************** 4 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING Next in Order: Ordinance: CSD 18-01 Resolution: CSD 18-02 CALL TO ORDER: President Jeff Comerchero ROLL CALL: DIRECTORS: Edwards, Naggar, Rahn, Stewart, Comerchero CSD PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 30 minutes is provided for members of the public to address the Board of Directors on items that appear within the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda. Each speaker is limited to three minutes. If the speaker chooses to address the Board of Directors on an item listed on the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda, a Request to Speak form may be filled out and filed with the City Clerk prior to the Board of Directors addressing Public Comments and the Consent Calendar. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all Public Hearing or District Business items on the agenda, a Request to Speak form may be filed with the City Clerk prior to the Board of Directors addressing that item. Each speaker is limited to five minutes. CSD CONSENT CALENDAR NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless Members of the Temecula Community Services District request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. 12 Approve the Action Minutes of March 13, 2018 RECOMMENDATION: 12.1 That the Board of Directors approve the action minutes of March 13, 2018. CSD DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT CSD GENERAL MANAGER REPORT CSD BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS CSD ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: Tuesday, April 10, 2018, at 5:30 PM, for a Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. 5 SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY — No Meeting TEMECULA HOUSING AUTHORITY — No Meeting TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY — No Meeting RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS 13 Community Development Department Monthly Report 14 Fire Department Monthly Report 15 Police Department Monthly Report 16 Public Works Department Monthly Report COMMISSION REPORTS PUBLIC SAFETY REPORT CITY MANAGER REPORT CITY ATTORNEY REPORT ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: Tuesday, April 10, 2018, at 5:30 PM, for a Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. Adjourned in Memory of Jack Williams *** NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC The agenda packet (including staff reports and public Closed Session information) will be available for public viewing in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula) after 4:00 PM the Friday before the City Council meeting. At that time, the agenda packet may also be accessed on the City's website — TemeculaCA.gov — and will be available for public viewing at the respective meeting. Supplemental material received after the posting of the Agenda Any supplemental material distributed to a majority of the City Council regarding any item on the agenda, after the posting of the agenda, will be available for public viewing in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula, 8:00 AM — 5:00 PM). In addition, such material will be made available on the City's website — TemeculaCA.gov — and will be available for public review at the respective meeting. If you have questions regarding any item on the agenda for this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's Department, (951) 694-6444. 6 PRESENTATIONS The City of Temecula PROCLAMA TION WHEREAS, in 1872, J. Sterling Morton proposed to the Nebraska Board of Agriculture that a special day be set aside for the planting of trees; and WHEREAS, this holiday, called Arbor Day, was first observed with the planting of more than a million trees in Nebraska; and WHEREAS, Arbor Day is now observed throughout the nation and the world; and WHEREAS, trees can reduce the erosion of our precious topsoil by wind and water, cut heating and cooling costs, moderate the temperature, clean the air, produce life-giving oxygen, and provide habitat for wild life; and WHEREAS, trees are a renewable resource giving us paper, wood for our homes, fuel for our fires and countless other wood products; and WHEREAS, trees in our city increase property values, enhance the economic vitality of business areas, and beautify our community; and WHEREAS, trees, wherever they are planted, are a source of joy and spiritual renewal. NOW, THEREFORE, I, Mayor Matt Rahn, on behalf of the City Council of the City of Temecula, hereby proclaim March 31, 2018, to be "Arbor Day" in the City of Temecula, and urge all citizens to celebrate Arbor Day and support efforts to protect our trees, woodlands, and urban forests, and to plant trees to gladden the heart and promote the well-being of this and future generations. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City of Temecula to be affixed this twenty-seventh day of March, 2018. Matt Rahn, Mayor Randi Johl City Clerk CITY COUNCIL CONSENT Item No. 1 Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance City Manager Por- Jek 6ft CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Randi Johl, City Clerk DATE: March 27, 2018 SUBJECT: Waive Reading of Standard Ordinances and Resolutions PREPARED BY: Randi Johl, City Clerk RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council waive the reading of the text of all standard ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda except as specifically required by the Government Code. BACKGROUND: The City of Temecula is a general law city formed under the laws of the State of California. With respect to adoption of ordinances and resolutions, the City adheres to the requirements set forth in the Government Code. Unless otherwise required, the full reading of the text of standard ordinances and resolutions is waived. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: None Item No. 2 ACTION MINUTES TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA MARCH 13, 2018 — 7:00 PM No Closed Session At 7:00 PM Mayor Rahn called the City Council meeting to order to consider the matters described on the agenda. CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Matt Rahn Prelude Music: Chaparral High School Spring Musical "Young Frankenstein" Invocation: Aaron Adams Flag Salute: Council Member James "Stew" Stewart National Anthem: Liam Naggar ROLL CALL: Comerchero, Edwards, Naggar, Stewart, Rahn PUBLIC COMMENTS The following individual addressed the City Council on non -agenda items: • Mark Katan CITY COUNCIL REPORTS CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Waive Reading of Standard Ordinances and Resolutions - Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0); Motion by Edwards, Second by Comerchero; and electronic vote reflected approval by Comerchero, Edwards, Naggar, Stewart and Rahn. RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 That the City Council waive the reading of the text of all standard ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda except as specifically required by the Government Code. 2 Approve the Action Minutes of February 27, 2018 - Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0); Motion by Edwards, Second by Comerchero; and electronic vote reflected approval by Comerchero, Edwards, Naggar, Stewart and Rahn. Action Minutes 031318 1 RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 That the City Council approve the City Council action minutes, Joint City Council/Community Services District, and Joint Meeting of the City Council and Public/Traffic Safety Commission action minutes of February 27, 2018. 3 Approve the List of Demands - Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0); Motion by Edwards, Second by Comerchero; and electronic vote reflected approval by Comerchero, Edwards, Naggar, Stewart and Rahn. RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 18-17 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A 4 Adopt Ordinance 18-06 Amending Section 17.04.020 of the Temecula Municipal Code Regarding Temporary Use Permits and Adding a New Chapter 17.42 Collection Containers, Establishing Permitting, Operational Requirements and Procedures for Enforcement (Long Range Planning Application Number LR17-1180) (Second Reading) - Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0); Motion by Edwards, Second by Comerchero; and electronic vote reflected approval by Comerchero, Edwards, Naggar, Stewart and Rahn. RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 That the City Council adopt an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 18-06 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING SECTION 17.04.020 "TEMPORARY USE PERMITS" AND ADDING A NEW CHAPTER 17.42 "COLLECTION CONTAINERS" TO TITLE 17 "ZONING" OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE AND FINDING THE ORDINANCE IS EXEMPT PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15061(B)(3) 5 Approve a Sponsorship Agreement with Trauma Intervention Program of Southwest Riverside County, Inc. for Traumatic Incident Citizen Support - Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0); Motion by Edwards, Second by Comerchero; and electronic vote reflected approval by Comerchero, Edwards, Naggar, Stewart and Rahn. RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 That the City Council approve a Sponsorship Agreement with Trauma Intervention Program of Southwest Riverside County, Inc., in the amount of $10,000, for Traumatic Incident Citizen Support. Action Minutes 031318 2 6 Approve an Agreement for Consultant Services with Fehr & Peers, Inc., for the Old Town Parking Management Plan Update - Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0); Motion by Edwards, Second by Comerchero; and electronic vote reflected approval by Comerchero, Edwards, Naggar, Stewart and Rahn. RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 That the City Council approve an Agreement for Consultant Services with Fehr & Peers, Inc., in the amount of $72,809, with a 10% contingency of $7,280, for a total agreement amount of $80,089, for the Old Town Parking Management Plan Update. 7 Amend the Capital Improvement Program Budget for Fiscal Years 2018-22 to Accelerate Funding for Medians and Ornamental Barriers — Citywide, from Fiscal Year 2018-19 to Fiscal Year 2017-18 - Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0); Motion by Naggar, Second by Edwards; and electronic vote reflected approval by Comerchero, Edwards, Naggar, Stewart and Rahn. Motion to approve with additional direction to have detailed review of pedestrian crossing solutions by the Public/Traffic Safety Commission before the item returns to Council for final approval. RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 18-18 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, TO AMEND THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEARS 2018-22 TO ACCELERATE FUNDING FOR MEDIANS AND ORNAMENTAL BARRIERS CITYWIDE, FROM FISCAL YEAR 2018-19 TO FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 8 Amend the Capital Improvement Program Budget for Fiscal Years 2018-22 to Accelerate Funding for Sidewalks — Citywide, from Fiscal Year 2018-19 to Fiscal Year 2017-18 and Award a Construction Contract to Eagle Paving Company, Inc. for Sidewalks — Old Town Improvement Project (Mercedes Street from Fourth Street to Sam Hicks Monument Park), PW17-04 - Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0); Motion by Edwards, Second by Comerchero; and electronic vote reflected approval by Comerchero, Edwards, Naggar, Stewart and Rahn. RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 18-19 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, TO AMEND THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEARS 2018-22 TO ACCELERATE FUNDING FOR SIDEWALKS — CITYWIDE, FROM FISCAL YEAR 2018-19 TO FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 Action Minutes 031318 3 8.2 Approve an additional appropriation of $400,000 from the Sidewalks — Citywide project to the Sidewalks — Old Town Improvement Project (Mercedes Street from Fourth Street to Sam Hicks Monument Park); 8.3 Award a Construction Contract to Eagle Paving Company, Inc., in the amount of $477,577, for Sidewalks — Old Town Improvement Project (Mercedes Street from Fourth Street to Sam Hicks Monument Park), PW17-04; 8.4 Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $47,757.70, which is equal to 10% of the Contract amount; 8.5 Make a finding that the Sidewalks — Old Town Improvement Project (Mercedes Street from Fourth Street to Sam Hicks Monument Park), PW 17-04, is exempt from Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) fees. 9 Amend the Capital Improvement Program Budget for Fiscal Years 2018-22 to Accelerate Funding from Sidewalks — Citywide, from Fiscal Year 2018-19 to Fiscal Year 2017-18 and Award a Construction Contract to Eagle Paving Company, Inc. for Sidewalks — Sixth Street Improvements, PW17-05 - Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0); Motion by Edwards, Second by Comerchero; and electronic vote reflected approval by Comerchero, Edwards, Naggar, Stewart and Rahn. RECOMMENDATION: 9.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 18-20 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, TO AMEND THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEARS 2018-22 TO ACCELERATE FUNDING FOR SIDEWALKS — CITYWIDE, FROM FISCAL YEAR 2018-19 TO FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 9.2 Approve an additional appropriation of $100,000 from the Sidewalks — Citywide project to the Sidewalks — Sixth Street Improvements; 9.3 Award a Construction Contract to Eagle Paving Company, Inc., in the amount of $150,595, for Sidewalks — Sixth Street Improvements, PW 17-05; 9.4 Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $15,059.50, which is equal to 10% of the Contract amount; 9.5 Make a finding that Sidewalks — Sixth Street Improvements, PW 17-05, is exempt from Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) fees. 10 Award a Construction Contract to CT & T Concrete Paving, Inc. for Sidewalks — Ynez Road, PW17-22 - Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0); Motion by Edwards, Second by Comerchero; and electronic vote reflected approval by Comerchero, Edwards, Naggar, Stewart and Rahn. Action Minutes 031318 4 RECOMMENDATION: 10.1 Award a Construction Contract to CT & T Concrete Paving, Inc., in the amount of $48,112.50, for Sidewalks — Ynez Road (Winchester Road to County Center Drive), PW 17-22; 10.2 Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $4,811.25, which is equal to 10% of the Contract amount. 11 Award a Construction Contract to Aramexx Group, Inc. for the Fallen Heroes Memorial, PW17-07 - Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0); Motion by Edwards, Second by Comerchero; and electronic vote reflected approval by Comerchero, Edwards, Naggar, Stewart and Rahn. RECOMMENDATION: 11.1 Approve an appropriation of $75,000 from the Public Art Fund to the Fallen Heroes Memorial, PW17-07; 11.2 Award a Construction Contract to Aramexx Group, Inc., in the amount of $153,485, for the Fallen Heroes Memorial, PW17-07; 11.3 Authorize the City Manager to approve Contract Change Orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $15,348.50, which is equal to 10% of the contract amount; 11.4 Make a finding that the Fallen Heroes Memorial project is exempt from Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) fees. 12 Approve the First Amendment to the Purchase and Installation Agreement with Miracle Recreation Equipment Company for Vail Ranch Park Playground Equipment Replacement, PW17-10 - Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0); Motion by Edwards, Second by Comerchero; and electronic vote reflected approval by Comerchero, Edwards, Naggar, Stewart and Rahn. RECOMMENDATION: 12.1 That the City Council approve the First Amendment to the Purchase and Installation Agreement with Miracle Recreation Equipment Company for additional services for the Vail Ranch Park Playground Equipment Replacement Project. 13 Approve the First Amendment to Agreement with Mike's Precision Welding, Inc. for Welding Maintenance Services - Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0); Motion by Edwards, Second by Comerchero; and electronic vote reflected approval by Comerchero, Edwards, Naggar, Stewart and Rahn. RECOMMENDATION: 13.1 That the City Council approve the First Amendment to the Agreement with Mike's Precision Welding, Inc., in the amount of $70,000, for a total agreement of $100,000, and extend the terms to June 30, 2020. Action Minutes 031318 5 14 Accept Improvements and File the Notice of Completion for the Old Town Sidewalk Improvement Project, PW 15-06 - Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0); Motion by Edwards, Second by Comerchero; and electronic vote reflected approval by Comerchero, Edwards, Naggar, Stewart and Rahn. RECOMMENDATION: 14.1 Accept the improvements for the Old Town Sidewalk Improvement Project, PW15-06, as complete; 14.2 Direct the City Clerk to file and record the Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a one-year Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the Contract amount; 14.3 Release the Labor and Materials Bond seven months after filing the Notice of Completion, if no liens have been filed. RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL JOINT MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Matt Rahn ROLL CALL: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Comerchero, Edwards, Naggar, Stewart, Rahn COMMISSIONERS: Borgeson, Levine, Nelson, Schwank, Willis 16 Conduct Annual Joint Meeting Between the City Council and the Community Services Commission — Receive and file. RECOMMENDATION: 16.1 That the City Council conduct the annual joint meeting between the City Council and the Community Services Commission. ADJOURNMENT OF JOINT MEETING COMMISSION REPORTS PUBLIC SAFETY REPORT CITY MANAGER REPORT CITY ATTORNEY REPORT Action Minutes 031318 6 ADJOURNMENT At 8:13 PM, the City Council meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, March 13, 2018, at 5:30 PM for Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. Matt Rahn, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] Action Minutes 031318 7 Item No. 3 Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Jennifer Hennessy, Director of Finance DATE: March 27, 2018 SUBJECT: Approve the List of Demands PREPARED BY: Pascale Brown, Fiscal Services Manager Jada Shafe, Accounting Technician II RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 18- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A BACKGROUND: All claims and demands are reported and summarized for review and approval by the City Council on a routine basis at each City Council meeting. The attached claims represent the paid claims and demands since the last City Council meeting. FISCAL IMPACT: All claims and demands were paid from appropriated funds or authorized resources of the City and have been recorded in accordance with the City's policies and procedures. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution 2. List of Demands RESOLUTION NO. 18- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A, on file in the office of the City Clerk, has been reviewed by the City Manager's Office and that the same are hereby allowed in the amount of $4,951,641.77. Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 27th day of March, 2018. Matt Rahn, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY OF TEMECULA ss I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 18- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 27th day of March, 2018, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl, City Clerk CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS 03/01/2018 TOTAL CHECK RUN: $ 3,287,675.57 03/08/2018 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 1,143,614.99 03/08/2018 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN: 520,351.21 TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 03/27/2018 COUNCIL MEETING: $ 4,951,641.77 DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND: CHECKS: CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS 001 GENERAL FUND 125 PEG PUBLIC EDUCATION & GOVERNMENT 140 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT 165 AFFORDABLE HOUSING 190 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B STREET LIGHTS 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D REFUSE RECYCLING 196 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "L" LAKE PARK MAINT. 197 TEMECULA LIBRARY FUND 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS FUND 300 INSURANCE FUND 305 WORKERS' COMPENSATION 320 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 330 CENTRAL SERVICES 340 FACILITIES 395 2011 FINANCING LEASE CIVIC CENTER & CRC 472 CFD 01-2 HARVESTON A&B DEBT SERVICE 473 CFD 03-1 CROWNE HILL DEBT SERVICE FUND 474 AD03-4 JOHN WARNER ROAD DEBT SERVICE 475 CFD03-3 WOLF CREEK DEBT SERVICE FUND 476 CFD 03-6 HARVESTON 2 DEBT SERVICE FUND 477 CFD 03-02 RORIPAUGH DEBT SERVICE FUND 478 CFD 16-01 RORIPAUGH PHASE II 501 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 1 SADDLEWOOD 502 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 2 WINCHESTER CREEK 503 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 3 RANCHO HIGHLANDS 504 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 4 THE VINEYARDS 505 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 5 SIGNET SERIES 506 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 6 WOODCREST COUNTRY 507 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 7 RIDGEVIEW 508 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 8 VILLAGE GROVE 509 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 9 RANCHO SOLANA 510 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 10 MARTINIQUE 511 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 11 MEADOWVIEW 512 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 12 VINTAGE HILLS 513 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 13 PRESLEY DEVELOP. 514 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 14 MORRISON HOMES 515 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 15 BARCLAY ESTATES 516 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 16 TRADEWINDS 517 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 17 MONTE VISTA 518 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 18 TEMEKU HILLS 519 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 19 CHANTEMAR 520 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 20 CROWNE HILL 521 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 21 VAIL RANCH 522 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 22 SUTTON PLACE 523 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 23 PHEASENT RUN 524 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 24 HARVESTON 525 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 25 SERENAHILLS 526 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 26 GALLERYTRADITION 527 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 27 AVONDALE 528 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 28 WOLF CREEK 529 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 29 GALLERY PORTRAIT 700 CERBT CALIFORNIA EE RETIREE-GASB45 $ 2,666,261.18 80.00 21,366.14 21,340.08 270,310.17 369.12 1,884.36 4,001.05 10,753.18 728,934.92 2,998.20 4,078.22 59,910.83 19,070.43 45,390.11 534,959.38 68.60 68.60 68.60 68.60 68.60 68.60 342.70 264.93 314.48 36.62 67.53 502.72 191.96 224.63 352.05 71.97 207.97 43.64 153.06 32.64 313.15 95.00 44.50 40.60 846.59 177.79 12,230.64 348.24 45.25 9.18 195.93 485.51 1.62 188.34 12,294.84 3.51 9,044.00 $ 4,431,290.56 CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS 001 GENERAL FUND $ 284,592.40 140 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT 427.85 165 AFFORDABLE HOUSING 3,136.27 190 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 128,646.55 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B STREET LIGHTS 334.99 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D REFUSE RECYCLING 2,413.70 196 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "L" LAKE PARK MAINT. 363.95 197 TEMECULA LIBRARY FUND 1,778.84 300 INSURANCE FUND 993.89 305 WORKERS' COMPENSATION 1,966.52 320 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 30,064.18 330 CENTRAL SERVICES 4,003.73 340 FACILITIES 7,928.01 472 CFD 01-2 HARVESTON A&B DEBT SERVICE 40.62 473 CFD 03-1 CROWNE HILL DEBT SERVICE FUND 40.62 474 AD03-4 JOHN WARNER ROAD DEBT SERVICE 40.62 475 CFD03-3 WOLF CREEK DEBT SERVICE FUND 40.62 476 CFD 03-6 HARVESTON 2 DEBT SERVICE FUND 40.62 477 CFD 03-02 RORIPAUGH DEBT SERVICE FUND 40.62 478 CFD 16-01 RORIPAUGH PHASE II 203.30 501 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 1 SADDLEWOOD 27.96 502 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 2 WINCHESTER CREEK 44.93 503 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 3 RANCHO HIGHLANDS 38.23 504 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 4 THE VINEYARDS 5.55 505 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 5 SIGNET SERIES 63.54 506 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 6 WOODCREST COUNTRY 10.04 507 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 7 RIDGEVIEW 11.27 508 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 8 VILLAGE GROVE 211.78 509 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 9 RANCHO SOLANA 1.99 510 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 10 MARTINIQUE 9.19 511 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 11 MEADOWVIEW 3.32 512 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 12 VINTAGE HILLS 122.26 513 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 13 PRESLEY DEVELOP. 26.11 514 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 14 MORRISON HOMES 9.46 515 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 15 BARCLAY ESTATES 7.75 516 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 16 TRADEWINDS 30.60 517 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 17 MONTE VISTA 1.06 518 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 18 TEMEKU HILLS 113.45 519 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 19 CHANTEMAR 60.55 520 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 20 CROWNE HILL 169.21 521 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 21 VAIL RANCH 278.07 522 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 22 SUTTON PLACE 4.18 523 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 23 PHEASENT RUN 7.27 524 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 24 HARVESTON 156.48 525 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 25 SERENA HILLS 50.25 526 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 26 GALLERYTRADITION 1.46 527 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 27 AVONDALE 7.27 528 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 28 WOLF CREEK 239.93 529 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 29 GALLERY PORTRAIT 2.66 700 CERBT CALIFORNIA EE RETIREE-GASB45 51,537.49 520,351.21 TOTAL BY FUND: $ 4,951,641.77 apChkLst 03/01/2018 11: 45: 50A M Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 1 Bank : union UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor 3686 02/09/2018 006887 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA 020495 NORTERN CALIFORNIA CHAPTER, INT'L PUBLIC MGMT NCCIPMA 007044 CLAIM JUMPER RESTAURANT 019506 EVERNOTE CORPORATION 020497 YOURMEMBERSHIP.COM 000203 JOBS AVAILABLE INC 008707 BOXWOOD TECHNOLOGY INC 009623 PUBLIC AGENCY RISK MANAGERS 020498 ALLIANCE FOR INNOVATION 008668 WES FLOWERS 009612 BJ'S RESTAURANTS, INC. Description Amount Paid Check Total IG REGISTRATION CONFERENCE: GARIBAY, I. IG RFRSHMNTS: EXEC ASSIST. INTERVIEW IG ANNUAL SUBSCRIPTION FOR: GARIBAY, I. IG JOB ADVERTISEMENT: ASSOC. ENGINEER IG JOB ADVERTISEMENT: SR CIVIL ENGINEER IG JOB ADVERTISEMENT: ASSOCIATE ENGINEER IG CONFERENCE REGISTRATION: CARDENAS, R. IG WORKSHOP REGISTRATION: GARIBAY, I. IG SUNSHINE FUND IG RFRSHMNTS: ADMIN ASSIST INTERVIEW 429.00 64.15 42.00 199.00 390.00 320.00 450.00 139.00 61.43 54.40 2,148.98 Pagel apChkLst Final Check List 03/01/2018 11:45:50AM CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 2 Bank : union UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor 3697 02/14/2018 006887 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Description Amount Paid Check Total 000152 CALIF PARKS & RECREATION KH CONF & EXPO REGIST: 475.00 SOC LAWRENCE, J. 000152 CALIF PARKS & RECREATION KH CONF & EXPO REGIST: HAWKINS, 475.00 SOC K. 000152 CALIF PARKS & RECREATION KH CONF & EXPO REGIST: SISLER, 475.00 SOC LACY 006952 PAYPAL KH VERISIGN PAYFLOW PRO 236.90 TRANSACTION 020249 LAUND3R.COM LLC KH TABLE CLOTH LAUNDRY: 153.50 CONFERENCE CTR 000152 CALIF PARKS & RECREATION KH AGENCY MEMBERSHIP: HAWKINS, 475.00 SOC K. 012126 BOWERS MUSEUM KH TICKETS: SENIOR EXCURSION: 216.00 MPSC 020499 CONTAINERSTORE.COM KH OFFICE SUPPLIES 90.16 000152 CALIF PARKS & RECREATION KH MEMBERSHIP REGISTRATION: 145.00 SOC WILLCOX, J. 000152 CALIF PARKS & RECREATION KH MEMBERSHIP REGISTRATION: 145.00 SOC MOREY, M. 004822 RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY KH DIAL RIDE VOUCHERS: MPSC 300.00 007051 RALPHS KH RFRSHMNTS: MOZART 79.90 CELEBRATION 000152 CALIF PARKS & RECREATION KH MEMBERSHIP FEES: HAWKINS, K. 480.00 SOC 001365 RIVERSIDE, COUNTY OF, KH HEALTH PERMIT: ROD RUN 428.00 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH VENDORS DEPT 001365 RIVERSIDE, COUNTY OF, KH HEALTH PERMIT: ROD RUN 10.14 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH VENDORS DEPT 000152 CALIF PARKS & RECREATION KH CONF & EXPO REGIST: ADAMIAK, 250.00 SOC D. 000152 CALIF PARKS & RECREATION KH CONF & EXPO REGIST: 250.00 SOC AUGUSTINE, W. 000152 CALIF PARKS & RECREATION KH MEMBERSHIP REGISTRATION: 145.00 SOC WOOTEN, M. 000152 CALIF PARKS & RECREATION KH CONF & EXPO REGIST: RUSSO, E. 475.00 SOC 000152 CALIF PARKS & RECREATION KH CONF & EXPO REGIST: GILLILAND, 475.00 SOC R. 000152 CALIF PARKS & RECREATION KH CONF & EXPO REGIST: WILLCOX, 475.00 SOC G. 000152 CALIF PARKS & RECREATION KH CONF & EXPO REGIST: WILLCOX, 475.00 SOC J. 014583 PALUMBO'S RISTORANTE, LLC KH RFSHMNTS: MTG WITH HOMELESS 93.06 OUTREACH Page2 apChkLst 03/01/2018 11:45:50AM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 3 Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor 019825 GETTY IMAGES 000152 CALIF PARKS & RECREATION SOC 000152 CALIF PARKS & RECREATION SOC 000152 CALIF PARKS & RECREATION SOC 000152 CALIF PARKS & RECREATION SOC 000152 CALIF PARKS & RECREATION SOC 000152 CALIF PARKS & RECREATION SOC 019751 STRYDER TRANSPORTATION 3698 02/27/2018 007282 AMAZON.COM, INC 3702 02/22/2018 006887 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA 000912 CITY CLERKS ASSN OF CALIF 020024 THE BRIDGE ON THIRD 000501 INTL INSTITUTE OF MUNICIPAL 000912 CITY CLERKS ASSN OF CALIF 000912 CITY CLERKS ASSN OF CALIF 3704 02/22/2018 006887 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA 020444 MEETINGSIFT.COM 013338 APPLE STORE 002377 BEST BUY COMPANY INC 018457 THYCOTIC SOFTWARE, LLC 008956 PANERA BREAD 019588 VERIATO, INC. 008956 PANERA BREAD 013851 STORM SOURCE, LLC 015112 ENVATO.COM 3705 02/28/2018 007282 AMAZON.COM, INC Description Amount Paid Check Total KH IMAGES FOR PROMOTIONAL FLYERS KH MEMBERSHIP REGISTRATION: LAWRENCE, J. KH MEMBERSHIP REGISTRATION: SISLER, L. KH MEMBERSHIP REGISTRATION: GILLILAND, KH MEMBERSHIP REGISTRATION: ADAMIAK, D. KH MEMBERSHIP REGISTRATION: AUGUSTINE, KH MEMBERSHIP REGISTRATION: WILLCOX, G. KH TRANSPORTATION: SENIOR EXCURSION SUPPLIES:HUMAN SERVICES SUPPLIES:HUMAN SERVICES ROATHENIAN DIALOGUE: JOHL2/16/18 RO RFRSHMNTS: CITY CNCL CLOSED SESSION RO MEMBERSHIP DUES: RAMIREZ, E. RO ATHENIAN DIALOGUE: JOH L 3/23/18 ROATHENIAN DIALOGUE: JOHL4/6/18 MH MONTHLY RENEWAL FEES MH APPLECARE WARRANTY: IT & CMO MH TV & BLUE RAY: IWTCM MH SERVER PASSWORD MANAGEMENT MH RFSHMNTS: ASSET MGMT WORKSHOP MH MONITORING SOFTWARE MH RFSHMNTS: ASSET MGMT WORKSHOP MH APPOINTMENT PLUS:IT MH DIGITAL ASSETS PURCHASE SUPPLIES: WORKFORCE 149.00 145.00 145.00 145.00 145.00 145.00 145.00 836.00 27.76 64.68 75.00 184.88 100.00 75.00 75.00 149.00 232.00 448.75 984.90 103.97 162.00 15.99 40.00 80.00 140.48 8,677.66 92.44 509.88 2,216.61 140.48 Page:3 apChkLst Final Check List 03/01/2018 11:45:50AM CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 4 Bank : union UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Description Amount Paid Check Total 3706 03/01/2018 014685 COMPASS BANK '11 REFUNDING 01/08 CERT PART DEBT SVC 187719 03/01/2018 016764 ABM BUILDING SERVICES LLC HVAC MAINT: OTC 534,959.38 534,959.38 208.78 208.78 187720 03/01/2018 001517 AETNA BEHAVIORAL HEALTH BILLING ADJ/ADDING 1 MEMBER FOR 4.40 LLC, DBAAETNA RESOURCES MARCH FOR L MAR EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PRGM 187721 03/01/2018 015217 AIRGAS INC., DBA AIRGAS GAS FOR DRY ICE USA LLC EXPERIMENTS:PPW 187722 03/01/2018 003951 ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT PAVEMENT REHAB MARGARITA RD; P W 12-11 CREDIT: CHANGE ORDER NOTAUTHORI ASPHALT PRODUCTS: CITYWIDE 668.80 673.20 4.13 4.13 191,681.50 -3,814.25 635.06 188,502.31 187723 03/01/2018 009787 ALTEC INDUSTRIES INC REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE - TRAFFIC 493.50 & MAINT REPAIR & MAINT: TRAFFIC AND MAINT B 935.50 1,429.00 187724 03/01/2018 005037 AMERICAN ASPHALT SOUTH NOV RESIDENTIAL SLURRY SEAL: PW 168,468.33 168,468.33 INC 17-03 187725 03/01/2018 004240 AMERICAN FORENSIC NURSES PHLEBOTOMY SRVCS:TEMECULA 690.00 (AFN) POLICE PHLEBOTOMY SRVCS:TEMECULA POLIC 225.00 187726 03/01/2018 002187 ANIMAL FRIENDS OF THE DEC ANIMAL CONTROL SRVCS:CITY 10,000.00 VALLEYS OF TEMECUL 187727 03/01/2018 017149 BGP RECREATION INC 187728 03/01/2018 011954 BAKER & TAYLOR INC TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS BOOK COLLECTIONS:LIBRARY BOOK COLLECTIONS:LIBRARY BOOK COLLECTIONS:LIBRARY BOOK COLLECTIONS:LIBRARY BOOK COLLECTIONS:LIBRARY BOOK COLLECTIONS:LIBRARY BOOK COLLECTIONS:LIBRARY 187729 03/01/2018 018101 BARN STAGE COMPANY INC, STTLMNT:CABARETATTHE MERC: THE 02/25/18 187730 03/01/2018 013482 BAS SECURITY SECURITY SERVICES:TCSD FACILITIES SECURITY SERVICES:TCSD FACILITIES 2,872.80 2,793.00 3,830.40 137.20 38.95 145.53 7.24 33.77 66.43 15.29 425.63 915.00 10,000.00 9,633.40 732.84 693.00 693.00 1,161.00 805.50 1,966.50 Page:4 apChkLst Final Check List 03/01/2018 11:45:50AM CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 5 Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 187731 03/01/2018 007385 BAUDVILLE INC VISITOR LOGIN BOOKS:FRONT RECEPTION 187732 03/01/2018 020508 BOHN, SHERRILL BALANCE ADJ FOR VIOLATION DISMISSAL 187733 03/01/2018 008605 BONTERRA PSOMAS 11/24-12/31 ENVIRO MITIGATION SVCS: FVP 187734 03/01/2018 010469 BOZONELOS, ROBERT MUSICAL PERF: 3/9/18 187735 03/01/2018 010939 CALIF DEPT OF INDUSTRIAL 115265 CONVEYOR INSPECTION: MERCEDES 187736 03/01/2018 001267 CALIF DEPT OF MOTOR 2018 CA VEHICLE CODE BOOKS VEHICLES 187737 03/01/2018 020083 CALIFORNIA SCULPTURE ARTWORK PURCHASE:FALLEN ACADEMY HEROES MEMORIAL 187738 03/01/2018 000131 CARL WARREN & COMPANY CLAIM ADJUSTER SERVICES 2,058.00 2,058.00 INC 187739 03/01/2018 008534 CASTILLO, RYAN EE COMPUTER PURCHASE PRGM 2,000.00 2,000.00 421.88 421.88 305.00 305.00 4,933.40 4,933.40 200.00 200.00 225.00 225.00 388.21 388.21 3,000.00 3,000.00 187740 03/01/2018 004462 CDW LLC, DBA CDW PHONE HEADSET - CITY CLERK'S 291.58 291.58 GOVERNMENT LLC DEPT. 187741 03/01/2018 007062 CLARITAS HOLDINGS INC ECON DEV: CITY'S DEMOGRAPHIC 1,002.00 1,002.00 SNAPSHOT 187742 03/01/2018 000442 COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS JAN -MAR ALARM SYS 5,820.00 MONITORING:VAR FACILIT SERVICE CALL: CHAPEL/MUSEUM 75.00 5,895.00 187743 03/01/2018 017120 CONSTRUCTION EXAM COMBO LEGAL & MGMT MODULES 850.00 850.00 CENTER 187744 03/01/2018 012353 CONSTRUCTION TESTING, & ENGINEERING INC DEC INSPECT SVCS MARGARITA RD: PW12-11 187745 03/01/2018 013379 COSSOU, CELINE TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 187746 03/01/2018 004329 COSTCOTEMECULA#491 SUPPLIES:CRC EVENTS 2,576.00 2,576.00 495.60 495.60 154.11 154.11 Page:5 apChkLst Final Check List 03/01/2018 11:45:50AM CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 6 Bank : union UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Description Amount Paid Check Total 187747 03/01/2018 014501 COUNTYWIDE MECHANICAL HVAC REPAIR SERVICE: CIVIC SYSTEMS CENTER 187748 03/01/2018 020436 CRONBERG, RICHARD N TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 748.75 748.75 308.00 308.00 187749 03/01/2018 000209 CROP PRODUCTION SERVICES REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE: STA 73 119.52 REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE: STA 73 104.38 223.90 187750 03/01/2018 014580 DANCE THEATRE COLLECTIVE TIX SALES: DANCEXCHANGE 2/20/018 38.50 THEATER PERFORMANCE: MARCH 16-1; 187751 03/01/2018 004285 DAVE BANG & ASSOCIATES TABLES & BENCHES: HARVESTON INC LAKE PK 187752 03/01/2018 008289 DAVIS, MELISSA 187753 03/01/2018 003945 DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTAL SRVCS 5,000.00 5,038.50 1,995 70 1,995 70 REIMB: AOAP CONF - 2/4/18 - 02/07/18 1,195.73 REIMB: AOAP CONF 2/5-2/9/17 PORTABLE RESTROOM RENTALS: VAIL RANCH PA PORTABLE RESTROOM RENTALS: LASE PORTABLE RESTROOM RENTALS: RIVEF PORTABLE RESTROOM RENTALS: LONG TEMPORARY FENCING: MARGARITA SPI 115.32 1,311.05 55.88 55.88 55.88 55.88 913.77 187754 03/01/2018 004192 DOWNS ENERGY FUEL & FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: POLICE 55.10 LUBRICANTS DEPT FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: PUBLIC WOF 322.31 187755 03/01/2018 002390 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER JAN WATER METER:39656 DIEGO DR 85.68 DIST JAN WATER METER:39569 SERAPHINA R JAN WATER METER:MURR HOT SPRING: JAN WATER METER:MURR HOT SPRING: 187756 03/01/2018 018098 ELITE CLAIMS MANAGEMENT, MAR 18 3RD PARTY CLAIM ADMIN: INC WRKRS COM 187757 03/01/2018 004111 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT 2017 QUARTERLY: ECON DEV DEPT 187758 03/01/2018 015090 EVAPCO PRODUCTS INC FEB CONDENSER H2O SYS MAINT: CIVIC CTR 187759 03/01/2018 019016 FLEETCREW, INC., DBA:FLEETCREW 187760 03/01/2018 018954 FLINT TRADING, INC 179.16 22.12 20.12 1,137.29 377.41 307.08 1,250.00 1,250.00 161.00 161.00 583.50 583.50 DIESEL PARTICULATE FILTER SVCS: 409.95 PW DIESEL PARTICULATE FILTER SVCS: PW 534.95 TRAFFIC PAINT: PW STREET MAINT 4,352.74 187761 03/01/2018 016436 FRICK, TRACY REIMB: PARENTS POSTER HANGING & 944.90 4,352.74 351.62 351.62 Pages apChkLst Final Check List 03101/2018 11:45:50AM CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 7 Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 187762 03/01/2018 018858 FRONTIER CALIFORNIA INC FEB INTERNET SVCS:41000 MAIN ST 4,875.22 FEB INTERNET SVCS:SENIOR CENTER 146.98 FEB INTERNET SVCS:FIRE STN 73 117.84 FEB INTERNET SVCS:LIBRARY 186.98 FEB INTERNET SVCS:41000 MAIN ST 2,499.06 7,826.08 187763 03/01/2018 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCTS OFFICE SUPPLIES: PW VAR DEPTS 388.93 INC OFFICE SUPPLIES:PW DEPTS 40.83 429.76 187764 03/01/2018 009608 GOLDEN VALLEY MUSIC TIX: CLASSICS AT THE MERC: 626.50 SOCIETY FEBRUARY TIX: OUT OF THIS WORLD 2/24 1,276.56 1,903.06 187765 03/01/2018 003792 GRAINGER MISC STAGE SUPPLIES: THEATER 126.92 126.92 187766 03/01/2018 015451 GREATAMERICA FINANCIAL FEB LEASE FOR 16 COPIERS:CITY SVCS HALL/OFF-S 523.70 523.70 Page:? apChkLst Final Check List 03/01/2018 11:45:50AM CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 8 Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor 187768 03/01/2018 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC Description Amount Paid Check Total MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: VAR PARKS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: OLD TOWN MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: CRC MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: CRC MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: CRC MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: CRC MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: AQUATICS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: AQUATICS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: IWTCM MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR MAINT SUPPLIES-HARVESTON LK PK MAINT SUPPLIES-HARVESTON LK PK MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: VAR PARKS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: VAR PARKS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: VAR PARKS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: VAR PARKS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: VAR PARKS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: VAR PARKS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: VAR PARKS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: VAR PARKS HARDWARE SUPPLIES - STN 73 BC MAINT SUPPLIES: TVM MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: TVE2 MAINT SUPPLIES-HARVESTON LK PK MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES:PW STREET C MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES:PW STREET C MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES:PW STREET C MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES:PW STREET C MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: VAR PARKS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: VAR PARKS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: VAR PARKS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: VAR PARKS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: VAR PARKS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: VAR PARKS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: VAR PARKS HARDWARE SUPPLIES - STA73 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: THEATER MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: TVE2 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: VAR PARKS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: VAR PARKS 240.84 47.83 12.27 11.95 2.49 23.35 12.57 35.37 0.85 21.63 34.76 1.08 12.36 27.80 40.92 16.25 160.83 7.59 18.42 3.86 47.50 33.42 24.98 28.21 32.61 36.52 1.95 12.48 93.39 39.18 15.20 91.22 65.23 425.69 35.88 29.01 33.23 59.90 21.73 37.39 8.66 7.50 76.64 136.66 2.38 37.63 Page:8 apChkLst Final Check List 03101/2018 11:45:50AM CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 9 Bank : union UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Description Amount Paid Check Total MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: VAR PARKS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: VAR PARKS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: VAR PARKS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: VAR PARKS MISCELLANEOUS SMALL TOOLS & EQUI MAINT SUPPLIES-HARVESTON LK PK MAINT SUPPLIES: TVM MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: THEATER 187769 03/01/2018 020506 HEMET UNIFIED SCHOOL REFUND:OVERPMT:FIELD DISTRICT TRIP:CAWSTON ELEM 187770 03/01/2018 003624 HOWELL, ANN MARIE GRAPHIC DESIGN: ECON DEV 187771 03/01/2018 007767 I C COMPOUND COMPANY ASPHALT SUPPLIES: PW STREET MAINT DIV 214.54 11.76 41.84 42.72 32.61 134.75 12.04 26.08 94.58 246.59 3,024.72 100.00 100.00 990.00 990.00 861.49 861.49 187772 03/01/2018 006914 INNOVATIVE DOCUMENT JAN COPIER 631.83 SOLUTIONS MAINT/REPAIR/USAGE:CITYWDE JAN COPIER MAINT/REPAIR/USAGE:CITI 10,591.39 11,223.22 187773 03/01/2018 000198 INTL COUNCIL OF SHOPPING MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL: EDWARDS, 50.00 50.00 MARYANN 187774 03/01/2018 015673 JDS VIDEO & MEDIA VIDEO PRODUCTION: ECON DEV 850.00 850.00 PRODUCTIONS 187775 03/01/2018 011841 JOE RHODES MAINTENANCE, SERVICE INC 187776 03/01/2018 001091 KEYSER MARSTON ASSOCIATES INC, ATTN DIANE CHAMBERS FUEL PUMP: STA 95 FUEL PUMP: STA 95 JAN REAL ESTATE, HOUSING, CONSULT SVCS 2,291.99 1,131.02 4,875.00 3,423.01 4,875.00 187777 03/01/2018 013797 LA JOLLA BOOKING AGENCY STTLMNT: ABBA SHOW 2/23/18 6,740.00 STTLMNT: STONES & STEWART 2/25 5,960.00 12,700.00 187778 03/01/2018 000210 LEAGUE OF CALIF CITIES MEMBERSHIP MTG: EDWARDS, M. 25.00 25.00 187779 03/01/2018 020505 LEON,ADRIANA REFUND:SEC DEP:RM RENTAL:CRC 200.00 200.00 187780 03/01/2018 004905 LIEBERT, CASSIDY & JAN 18 LEGAL SVCS FOR TE060-00001 355.00 355.00 WHITMORE 187781 03/01/2018 011145 LODATO JILL CHRISTINE, DBA: TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 2,699.90 THE PARTY MOM TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 3,596.99 6,296.89 Page apChkLst Final Check List 03/0112018 11:45:50AM CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 10 Bank : union UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor 187782 03/01/2018 014365 MAILFINANCE INC 187783 03/01/2018 020510 MARTINEZ, XOCHITI 187784 03/01/2018 020503 MCINTOSH, PATRICIA 187785 03/01/2018 018314 MICHAEL BAKER (Continued) Description Amount Paid Check Total 03/14-06/13/18 POSTAGE 1,224.94 1,224.94 METER:LEASE REFUND:SEC DEP:RM RENTAL:TCC 150.00 150.00 REFUND:SEC DEP/KITCHEN 471.82 471.82 RENTAL:CRC 10/2-12/3/17 DSGN SVCS: PECHANGA 9,126.80 9,126.80 INTERNATIONAL PKWY 187786 03/01/2018 013827 MIKO MOUNTAINLION INC INSTALL TEMP FENCING: PARK -N -RIDE 187787 03/01/2018 012264 MIRANDA, JULIO C. 187788 03/01/2018 004043 MISSION ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC 187789 03/01/2018 016445 MKB PRINTING & PROMOTIONAL INC, DBA MINUTEMAN PRESS 187790 03/01/2018 001986 MUZAK LLC 187791 03/01/2018 015164 NATURES IMAGE INC 187792 03/01/2018 020507 NESLINE, CHRISTINE 187793 03/01/2018 014391 NICHOLS, KELLIE D TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: PARKING GARAGE ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: TES POOL RESTROOM LIGHT UPGRADES: HARV LY 3,000.00 3,000.00 537.60 470.40 218.40 877.78 735.62 129.68 BUSINESS CARDS:TEMECULA POLICE 32.22 1,226.40 1,743.08 ENVELOPES, RETURN -PINK, CERTS:BW 1,643.68 1,675.90 MAR DISH NETWORK PRGM:41952 6TH 68.37 ST MAR DISH NETWORK PROGRAMING:FOI 156.27 224.64 DEC PECHANGA PKWY ENVIRON 574.11 MITIGATION JAN PECHANGA PKWY ENVIRON MITIGA 400.26 974.37 BALANCE ADJ FOR VIOLATION 35.00 35.00 DISMISSAL TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 336.00 336.00 187794 03/01/2018 019472 NNASERVICES LLC REFUND:SEC DEP:RM RENTAL:CONF 150.00 150.00 CTR NB 187795 03/01/2018 002292 OASIS VENDING KITCHEN & COFFEE SUPPLIES:MPSC 1,075.29 1,075.29 187796 03/01/2018 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE AND SERVICE CITY VEHICLE MAINT SVCS:PW STREET MAINT 187797 03/01/2018 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE AND SERVICE CITY VEHICLE MAINT SVCS:PARK RANGER 2,017.31 2,017.31 632.84 632.84 Page:10 apChkLst 03/01/2018 11:45:50AM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 11 Bank : union UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor 187798 03/01/2018 013198 ORTENZO-HAYES, KRISTINE 187799 03/01/2018 020504 OSHODI, SUNYATA 187800 03/01/2018 011549 POWER SPORTS UNLIMITED, DBA BMW MOTORCYCLES OF NO 187801 03/01/2018 017648 RAHN, MATT 187802 03/01/2018 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DISTRICT 187803 03/01/2018 020350 REEFE, REBECCA 187804 03/01/2018 020379 RICHARD ALLEN ENTERPRISES LLC 187805 03/01/2018 000353 RIVERSIDE CO AUDITOR, CONTROLLER (STOP 1050) 187806 03/01/2018 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS DEPT 187807 03/01/2018 012251 ROTH, DONALD J 187808 03/01/2018 004274 SAFE AND SECURE LOCKSMITH SRVC 187809 03/01/2018 020509 SANCHEZ, ARMANDO (Continued) Description Amount Paid Check Total TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS REFUND:CREDIT ON ACCT:TCSD VEHICLE MAINT & REPAIR: POLICE MOTORS VEHICLE MAINT & REPAIR: POLICE MOT! VEHICLE MAINT & REPAIR: POLICE MOT' MTG WITH CITY LOBBYISTS 2/25-2/26/18 FEB VAR WATER METERS:PW YMCA FEB VAR WATER METERS:TCSD SVC LE' FEB LNDSCP WATER METER:CALLE ELE REFUND:MISS CATHY'S TINY TOTS FREEDOM RIDERS:A CIVIL RIGHTS MUSICAL 2/ JAN '18 PRKG CITATION ASSESSMENTS 01/04/18-01/31/18 LAW ENFORCEMENT TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS KEY, SPARE: PARKS VEHICLE #03-086 LOCKSMITH SRVCS:CRC LOCKSMITH SERVICES:LIBRARY LOCKSMITH SRVCS: CRC 2/2/18 LOCKSMITH SRVCS: CIVIC CENTER REFUND:BALADJ FOR VIOL DISMISSED:323178 187810 03/01/2018 020501 SANDEE, MARY REFUND:DUPL PERMIT:B18-0432 386.40 338.10 1,159.20 1,159.20 394.45 362.25 386.40 24.00 1,364.20 51.00 542.25 461.50 361.41 7,443.53 30.55 78.00 3,500.00 3,291.00 2,095,543.86 441.00 441.00 97.51 26.94 26.40 17.24 30.17 305.00 4,186.00 24.00 1,957.45 461.50 7,835.49 78.00 3,500.00 3,291.00 2,095,543.86 882.00 198.26 305.00 266.00 266.00 Page:11 apChkLst 03/01/2018 11:45:50A M Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 12 Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor 187811 03/01/2018 017699 SARNOWSKI SHAWNA M PRESTON 187812 03/01/2018 011511 SCUBA CENTER TEMECULA 187813 03/01/2018 009213 SHERRY BERRY MUSIC, ATTN SHERRY WILLIAMS 187814 03/01/2018 009746 SIGNS BY TOMORROW 187815 03/01/2018 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 187816 03/01/2018 001212 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 187817 03/01/2018 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTROL INC Description Amount Paid Check Total PHOTOGRAPHY:CULTURAL ARTS PHOTOGRAPHY:SWEETHEART CONGER TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS JAZZ @ THE MERC 2/22/18 JAN SIGN POSTING SRVCS XX -0324: P LN G JAN SIGN POSTING SRVCS XX -1508-09:F JAN SIGN POSTING NOI TO ADOPT MND JAN SIGN POSTING XX0741, XX1640:PLI\ FEB 2-33-357-5785:44747 REDHAWK PKWY JAN 2-30-296-9522:46679 PRIMROSE AVE JAN 2-30-099-3847:29721 RYECREST FEB 2-28-331-4847:32805 PAUBA RD LS3 FEB 2-34-624-4452:32131 S LOOP RD LO - JAN 095-167-7907-2:30650 PAUBA RD JAN 125-244-2108-3: 30600 PAUBA RD PEST CONTROL SRVCS:O.A.T.C. PEST CONTROL SRVCS:STA 92 PEST CONTROL SRVCS:PBSP PEST CONTROL SRVCS:WOLF CREEK P. PEST CONTROL SRVCS:RRSP PEST CONTROL SRVCS:RRSP PEST CONTROL SRVCS:MEADOWS PAR PEST CONTROL SRVCS:DUCK POND PEST CONTROL SRVCS:MARG SPLASH I 150.00 150.00 52.50 504.00 569.00 851.00 425.50 425.50 425.50 33.95 622.38 25.55 103.20 1,129.25 194.04 446.34 48.00 42.00 70.00 49.00 188.00 94.00 94.00 49.00 84.00 300.00 556.50 569.00 2,127.50 1,914.33 640.38 718.00 Page:12 apChkLst Final Check List 03/01/2018 11:45:50AM CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 13 Bank : union UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor 187818 03/01/2018 008337 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAGE (Continued) Description Amount Paid Check Total OFFICE SUPPLIES:HUMAN SERVICES 45.15 OFFICE SUPPLIES:HUMAN SERVICES OFFICE SUPPLIES:POLICE MALL STORE OFFICE SUPPLIES:POLICE MALL STORE OFFICE SUPPLIES:POLICE MALL STORE OFFICE SUPPLIES:POLICE MALL STORE OFFICE SUPPLIES:POLICE MALL STORE OFFICE SUPPLIES:CITY MGR OFC OFFICE SUPPLIES:CITY MGR OFC OFFICE SUPPLIES:CITY MGR OFC OFFICE SUPPLIES:LIBRARY OFFICE SUPPLIES:TCSDADMIN OFFICE SUPPLIES:TCSD ADMIN OFFICE SUPPLIES:TCSD ADMIN SUPPLIES:SKATE PARK 187819 03/01/2018 003599 T Y LIN INTERNATIONAL JAN CONSULT SRVCS:FV PKWY/I-15 OVRCRSS 187820 03/01/2018 003677 TEMECULA MOTORSPORTS LLC VEH REPAIR & MAINT:TEMECULA POLICE VEH REPAIR & MAINT:TEMECULA POLICI VEH REPAIR & MAINT:TEMECULA POLICI VEH REPAIR & MAINT:TEMECULA POLICI VEH REPAIR & MAINT:TEMECULA POLICI 187821 03/01/2018 020502 TEMECULAVALLEYCULTURAL REFUND:SEC DEP:RM RENTAL:CRC CTR 90.08 310.79 64.83 41.52 9.75 40.51 39.99 86.43 83.22 86.39 39.18 4.50 288.97 148.07 1,379.38 74,796.71 74,796.71 238.76 40.50 765.42 244.42 40.05 1,329.15 150.00 150.00 187822 03/01/2018 010276 TIME WARNER CABLE FEB HIGH SPEED INTERNET:40820 1.60 WINCHESTER FEB HIGH SPEED INTERNET:32211 WOLF 184.62 FEB HIGH SPEED INTERNET:41000 MAIN 2,079.00 FEB HIGH SPEED INTERNET:41000 MAIN 4,074.26 6,339.48 187823 03/01/2018 018556 TRAUB NORMAN, DBA 11/20-12/14 WORKPLACE 10,351.00 10,351.00 NORMAN A TRAUB ASSOC INVESTIGATIONS:HR 187824 03/01/2018 014848 VALUTEC CARD SOLUTIONS JAN TICKETING SRVCS:THEATER 924.32 924.32 LLC 187825 03/01/2018 014486 VERIZON WIRELESS 187826 03/01/2018 018147 WADDLETON, JEFFREY L. 1/11-2/10 TASK FORCE 436.72 436.72 TABLETS:POLICE TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 280.00 280.00 187827 03/01/2018 006248 WALKER, JESSICA TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 563.50 563.50 Page:13 apChkLst Final Check List 03/0112018 11:45:50AM CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 14 Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 187828 03/01/2018 000341 WILLDAN ASSOCIATES INC MAY '17 ON-CALL TRAF ENG SRVCS:PW TRAFFI 1001979 02/22/2018 020494 CHIEN, SHARON 1001980 02/22/2018 019990 CONCEPCION, CATHERINE 1001981 02/22/2018 020496 WARD, VIOLETA 9,470.66 9,470.66 REFUND:BALANCE ON ACCT:TCSD 55.00 55.00 REFUND:CREDIT ON ACCT:TCSD 500.00 500.00 REFUND:CREDIT ON ACCT:TCSD 38.00 38.00 Grand total for UNION BANK: 3,287,675.57 Page:14 apChkLst 03/01/2018 11:45:50AM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 15 119 checks in this report. Grand Total All Checks. 3,287,675 57 Page:15 apChkLst Final Check List 03/08/2018 9:54:35AM CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 1 Bank : union UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor 3699 02/22/2018 006887 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA Description Amount Paid Check Total 014583 PALUMBO'S RISTORANTE, LLC AA RFRHSHMNTS: CITY ATTY MTG 1/23/18 3700 02/22/2018 006887 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA 020489 GREYHOUND LINES 3701 02/22/2018 006887 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA 016071 HARBOR FREIGHT TOOLS 106.96 106.96 CG BUS TICKET HOMELESS 179.91 OUTREACH CG REVERSAL OF FINANCE CHARGES -1.71 LM STANDS FOR VEHICLE 427.17 INSPECTIONS LM REVERSAL OF FINANCE CHARGES -1.75 3703 02/22/2018 006887 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA 008668 WES FLOWERS IG SUNSHINE FUND 61.43 008668 WES FLOWERS IG SUNSHINE FUND 61.43 006937 SOUTHWEST AIRLINES IG AIRFARE: CONFERENCE: GARIBAY, 131.96 008668 WES FLOWERS IG SUNSHINE FUND 61.43 019302 "' MR. WORLDWIDE IG DEPOSIT: RFRSHMNTS: EOQ 850.00 CATERING LUNCHEON 178.20 425.42 006937 SOUTHWEST AIRLINES IG AIRFARE: CONFERENCE: GARIBAY, 113.96 1,280.21 3707 03/05/2018 007282 AMAZON.COM, INC TEACHING EQUIPMENT MEDIC 632.90 MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES: BC 218.80 851.70 3708 03/05/2018 006887 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA 006952 PAYPAL JH VERISIGN PAYFLOW PRO 164.90 TRANSACTION 004765 ACTIVE NETWORK INC, THE JH REGISTRATION: TYLER CONNECT: 925.00 1,089.90 WOOSLEY 3709 03/07/2018 007282 AMAZON.COM, INC BOOKS/COLLECTIONS:LIBRARY 411.83 BOOKS/COLLECTIONS:LIBRARY 16.21 MUSEUM SUPPLIES:TVM 189.33 SM TOOLS/EQUIP:CRC 618.42 Event supplies:Arts, Culture & 16.70 1,252.49 3710 03/08/2018 010349 CALIF DEPT OF CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT 1,008.45 1,008.45 SUPPORT 3711 03/08/2018 017429 COBRA ADVANTAGE INC., REIMBURSEMENT FSA PAYMENT 14,141.06 14,141.06 DBA:THE ADVANTAGE GROUP 3712 03/08/2018 000194 ICMA RETIREMENT -PLAN ICMA-RC RETIREMENT TRUST 457 8,611.73 8,611.73 303355 PAYMENT Page:1 apChkLst Final Check List 03108/2018 9:54:35AM CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 2 Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor 3713 03/08/2018 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 3714 03/08/2018 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 3715 03/08/2018 000389 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION 3716 03/08/2018 001065 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION Description Amount Paid Check Total STATE TAXES PAYMENT 24,398.25 24,398.25 FEDERAL INCOME TAXES PAYMENT 81,545.58 81,545.58 OBRA- PROJECT RETIREMENT 2,990.76 2,990.76 PAYMENT NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT PAYMENT 12,782.73 12,782.73 3717 03/08/2018 019088 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT NATIONWIDE LOAN REPAYMENT SOLUTION PAYMENT 3718 03/08/2018 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT) 3719 03/08/2018 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT) 3720 03/08/2018 000245 PERS-HEALTH INSUR PREMIUM 3721 03/08/2018 007282 AMAZON.COM, INC 187829 03/08/2018 003552 AF L A C 442.44 442.44 PERS RETIREMENT PAYMENT 95,822.60 95,822.60 PERS RETIREMENT PAYMENT 96,183.43 96,183.43 PERS HEALTH PAYMENT 0.00 PERS HEALTH PAYMENT 125,615.14 125,615.14 Event supplies:Arts, Culture & 43.38 MISC SUPPLIES:VARIOUS EVENTS 39.84 MISC SUPPLIES:PREV. ANNUAL INSPEC- 282.78 SUPPLIES & EQUIPMENT:SPECIAL EVEN 80.68 446.68 AFLAC ACCIDENT INDEMNITY 3,432.64 3,432.64 PAYMENT 187830 03/08/2018 004973 ABACHERLI, LINDI TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 280.00 280.00 187831 03/08/2018 015217 AIRGAS INC., DBA AIRGAS GAS FOR DRY ICE 7.20 USA LLC EXPERIMENTS:PPW GAS FOR DRY ICE EXPERIMENTS:PPW 10.66 GAS FOR DRY ICE EXPERIMENTS:PPW 20.06 187832 03/08/2018 019604 AIRWAVE COMMUNICATIONS ANTENNAE: EMERG MGMT 3,623.57 ENT 187833 03/08/2018 003951 ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT 187834 03/08/2018 009374 ALLEGRO MUSICAL VENTURES, DBA: ALLEGRO PIANO SERVIC ASPHALT PRODUCTS: CITYWIDE ASPHALT PRODUCTS: CITYWIDE ASPHALT PRODUCTS: CITYWIDE ASPHALT PRODUCTS: CITYWIDE PIANO TUNING & MAINT: THEATER PIANO TUNING & MAINT: THEATER 400.15 539.49 776.36 522.28 185.00 37.92 3,623.57 2,238.28 185.00 370.00 Page2 apChkLst 03/0812018 9:54:35AM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 3 Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor 187835 03/08/2018 014356 ARSENAL FUTBOL CLUB, INC. 187836 03/08/2018 018941 AZTEC LANDSCAPING, INC. 187837 03/08/2018 019709 BAGDASARIAN, NADYA 187838 03/08/2018 011954 BAKER & TAYLOR INC 187839 03/08/2018 006254 BALLET FOLKLORICO, AKA: LORENA HANCOCK 187840 03/08/2018 015592 BAMM PROMOTIONAL PRODUCTS, INC 187841 03/08/2018 004262 BIO-TOX LABORATORIES 187842 03/08/2018 014284 BLAKELY'S TRUCK SERVICE 187843 03/08/2018 012583 BLANCAY PRICE 187844 03/08/2018 018408 BOB CALLAHAN'S POOL SERVICE 187845 03/08/2018 017973 BUSINESS CENTER CENTRAL, LLC 187846 03/08/2018 001035 C R & RINC 187847 03/08/2018 003138 CAL MAT Description Amount Paid Check Total REFUND:SEC DEP:PHBSP SOCCER FIELD 4 JANITORIAL SRVCS:VARI PARKS JAN RESTROOMS:SHELTERS MAINT: VAI RFRSHMNTS BEST GROUP AWARD: COM DEV BOOK COLLECTIONS:LIBRARY RECORDS ON TAPE BOOK COLLECTIONS:LIBRARY BOOK COLLECTIONS:LIBRARY BOOK COLLECTIONS:LIBRARY BOOK COLLECTIONS:LIBRARY BOOK COLLECTIONS:LIBRARY TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS STAFF UNIFORMS:CRC DRUG/ALCOHOL ANALYSIS:POLICE DRUG/ALCOHOL ANALYSIS:POLICE DRUG/ALCOHOL ANALYSIS:POLICE VEH & EQUIP REPAIRS: STREET MAINT VEH & EQUIP REPAIRS: STREET MAINT VEH & EQUIPMENT REPAIR: ST MAINT VEH & EQUIP REPAIRS: STREET MAINT VEH & EQUIP REPAIRS: STREET MAINT NOV LDSCP PLAN CHECK & INSPECTION SVCS FEB POOLS & FOUNTAINS MAINT:VAR FACILITI FEB POOLS & FOUNTAINS MAINT:CRC STICKERS FOR ECO DEV EMERGENCY DEBRIS CLEAN UP ASPHALT PURCH: STREET MAINT 2,000.00 821.57 7,729.74 106.14 623.34 5.60 1,343.55 101.91 17.28 92.74 107.87 161.70 161.70 102.90 299.55 389.00 939.70 1,756.00 320.08 720.07 370.19 1,074.01 245.38 10,155.00 925.00 1,050.00 34.80 366.91 2,000.00 8,551.31 106.14 2,292.29 426.30 299.55 3,084.70 2,729.73 10,155.00 1,975.00 34.80 366.91 174.50 174.50 Page:3 apChkLst 03/08/2018 9:54:35AM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 4 Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor 187848 03/08/2018 020513 CAL SOUTH 187849 03/08/2018 004248 CALIF DEPT OF JUSTICE-ACCTING 187850 03/08/2018 013318 CARDENAS, ROBERT 187851 03/08/2018 018719 CM SCHOOL SUPPLY INC 187852 03/08/2018 004091 COMMUNITY ACCESS CENTER 187853 03/08/2018 004405 COMMUNITY HEALTH CHARITIES 187854 03/08/2018 000442 COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS 187855 03/08/2018 002945 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST. 187856 03/08/2018 011922 CORELOGIC, INC., DBA:CORELOGIC SOLUTIONS, 187857 03/08/2018 014521 COSTAR GROUP INFORMATION, INC 187858 03/08/2018 001264 COSTCO TEMECULA 491 187859 03/08/2018 004329 COSTCO TEMECULA #491 187860 03/08/2018 002631 COUNTS UNLIMITED INC 187861 03/08/2018 004524 CRAFCO INC -ABSOLUTE ASPHALT 187862 03/08/2018 010650 CRAFTSMEN PLUMBING & HVAC INC Description Amount Paid Check Total REFUND:SEC DEP:PHBSP SOCCER FIELDS 1-4 FINGERPRINTING SVCS: VARI DEPTS REIMB:PARMA CONF: 2/13-16 SUPPLIES:PPW SUPPLIES:PPW 2018 RCVOAD MEMBERSHIP DUES EMPLOYEE CHARITY DONATIONS PAYMENT ALARM SYS MONITORING: FIRE STA 95 ALARM SYS MONITORING: FIRE STA 95 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR DEC PROP ID SFTWR: CODE ENFORCEMENT MAR 18 WEB SUBSCRIPTION:ECO DEV MEETING SUPPLIES: BC SUPPLIES:VARIOUS SPECIAL EVENTS TRAFFIC COUNT DATA COLLECTION SVCS: PW ASPHALT SUPPLIES: PW STREET MAINT DIV PLUMBING REPAIRS: CIVIC CTR PLUMBING REPAIRS: MPSC HVAC MAINT SVCS - IWTCM - PW16-02 EQUIPMENT MAIN - STA 95 PLUMBING MAINT: STA 84 EQUIPMENT MAINT: STA 84 EQUIPMENT MAINT - STA 92 PLUMBING MAINT: STA 84 2,000.00 4,851 00 439.27 10.92 70.42 25.00 4.00 75.00 75.00 205.54 295.50 453.19 175.04 363.38 15,150.00 3,723.50 609.20 140.00 410.00 2,890.00 158.32 130.00 650.00 594.00 2,000 00 4,851 00 439.27 81.34 25.00 4.00 150.00 205.54 295.50 453.19 175.04 363.38 15,150.00 3,723.50 5,581 52 Page:4 apChkLst Final Check List 03/08/2018 9:54:35AM CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 5 Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 187863 03/08/2018 020522 CUB SCOUTS OF AMERICA REFUND:SEC DEP:RM RENTAL:CRC 187864 03/08/2018 012600 DAVID EVANS & ASSOCIATES DSIGN SVCS FALLEN HEROES: INC PW17-07 187865 03/08/2018 002990 DAVID TURCH &ASSOCIATES FEB FEDERAL LOBBYING SVCS 187866 03/08/2018 013812 DFIT SUBS LLC SANDWICHES:HIGH HOPES 187867 03/08/2018 004192 DOWNS ENERGY FUEL & LUBRICANTS FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES:TRAFFIC DIV FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: PUBLIC WOF FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: PUBLIC WOF FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: TCSD FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: BLDG INSPEI FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: CODE ENFOI FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: POLICE FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: LAND DEV 187868 03/08/2018 019293 E&F PET SUPPLIES INC k-9 food & supplies: tem police 200.00 200.00 469.00 469.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 645.98 645.98 62.21 922.91 901.91 434.94 182.59 68.69 87.78 72.87 2,733.90 94.50 94.50 187869 03/08/2018 004829 ELLISON WILSON ADVOCACY MAR STATE LOBBYING SVCS 3,500.00 LLC FEB STATE LOBBYING SVCS 3,500.00 7,000.00 187870 03/08/2018 011202 EMH SPORTS USA INC TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 542.50 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 1,037.40 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 525.00 2,104.90 187871 03/08/2018 011292 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE 12/2 - 12/31/17 EIR: ALTAIR 5,391.86 5,391.86 ASSOC. 187872 03/08/2018 017432 EYEMED VISION CARE VISION PLAN PAYMENT 1,550.44 1,550.44 187873 03/08/2018 019469 FALCON ENGINEERING FEB CONSTRUCTION MGMT SVCS: 152,694.98 SERVICES PW04-08 FEB CNSTR MGMT SVC:WINCHESTER P' 28,083.00 180,777.98 187874 03/08/2018 019731 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC PLUMBING SUPPLIES: VARIOUS 223.91 PARKS PLUMBING SUPPLIES: VARIOUS PARKS 70.71 294.62 187875 03/08/2018 020013 FOLKLORE INC THEATER PERF: 03/09/18 3,500.00 3,500.00 187876 03/08/2018 002982 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD SUPPORT PAYMENT 260.00 SUPPORT PAYMENT 69.99 329.99 187877 03/08/2018 016436 FRICK, TRACY SISTER CITY VISIT ITEMS 11/28-12/3/17 69.88 69.88 Page:5 apChkLst Final Check List 03/08/2018 9:54:35AM CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 6 Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor 187878 03/08/2018 018858 FRONTIER CALIFORNIA INC Description Amount Paid Check Total FEB INTERNET SVCS:THEATER 146.98 MAR INTERNET SVCS:EOC 136.14 283.12 187879 03/08/2018 013076 GAUDET YVONNE M, DBA YES TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 268.80 268.80 YOU CAN DRAW 187880 03/08/2018 005405 GILLILAND, ROBIN LODGING & MILEAGE:PERF CNF 427.92 427.92 1/23-24 187881 03/08/2018 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCTS MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES: FINANCE 114.93 114.93 INC 187882 03/08/2018 003792 GRAINGER SAFETY SUPPLIES: STREET MAINT 189.23 189.23 DIV 187883 03/08/2018 015451 GREATAMERICA FINANCIAL FEB LEASE FOR 6 COPIERS:LIBRARY SVCS 187884 03/08/2018 020516 GUILAK-ANWAR, HALEH REFUND:CREDIT ON ACCT:TCSD 187885 03/08/2018 003342 HABITAT FOR HUMANITY, INLAND VALLEY INC 9/5/17-1/31/18 CRITICAL HOME REPAIR PRGM 9/5/17-1/31/18 CRITICAL HOME REPAIR P CDBG 2017-18 Critical Home Repair 793.89 793.89 860.00 860.00 4,894.73 3,805.51 2,308.93 11, 009.17 Page6 apChkLst Final Check List 03/08/2018 9:54:35AM CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 7 Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor 187886 03/08/2018 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC 187887 03/08/2018 020128 HOME HEALTHCARE OF RIVERSIDE Description Amount Paid Check Total MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: VAR PARKS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: VAR PARKS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: VAR PARKS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: VAR PARKS MAINT SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR MAINT SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR MAINT SUPPLIES: CONF CTR MAINT SUPPLIES-HARVESTON LK PK MAINT SUPPLIES-HARVESTON LK PK MAINT SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR MAINT SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR MAINT SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR MAINT SUPPLIES: CRC MAINT SUPPLIES: CRC MAINT SUPPLIES: CRC MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: VAR PARKS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: VAR PARKS DISCOUNT TAKEN: ACCOUNT 2649 MAINT SUPPLIES: TPL MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: STREET DIV MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: STREET DIV MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES:PW STREET C MAINT SUPPLIES: IWTCM MAINT SUPPLIES: IWTCM MAINT SUPPLIES: MPSC MAINT SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR MAINT SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR MAINT SUPPLIES: CRC MAINT SUPPLIES: CRC MAINT SUPPLIES: TVM MISC SMALL TOOLS & EQUIP: TRAFFIC MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: AQUATICS MAINT SUPPLIES: IWTCM MAINT SUPPLIES: TPL 4.67 21.03 28.79 20.64 21.63 22.40 21.70 134.53 52.71 38.45 10.86 26.38 89.29 19.55 3.39 19.11 8.12 -54.33 27.04 36.95 25.53 3.43 47.83 20.18 17.63 55.40 10.86 59.81 70.42 1.51 37.50 2.47 5.38 6.94 MEDICAL SVCS CLASSES 300.00 MEDICAL SVCS CLASSES MEDICAL SVCS CLASSES MEDICAL SVCS CLASSES MEDICAL SVCS CLASSES 187888 03/08/2018 011049 HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY JUL-DEC 17 SUB -RECIPIENT -HOSPICE CARE PR 187889 03/08/2018 017334 HOUSE OF AUTOMATION INC. BAY DOOR REPAIR: STATION 73 300.00 300.00 300.00 300.00 3,961.17 917.80 1,500.00 3,961 17 2,210.00 2,210.00 Page:7 apChkLst Final Check List 03/0812018 9:54:35AM CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 8 Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 187890 03/08/2018 003624 HOWELL, ANN MARIE MISC GRAPHIC ART SRVCS: CM OFC 1,540.00 1,540.00 187891 03/08/2018 019903 IMS INFRASTRUCTURE PAVEMENT MGMT PRGM: PW17-01 34,000.00 34,000.00 MANAGEMENT, SERVICES LLC 187892 03/08/2018 015089 IN THE MIX SOUND MISC STAGE SUPPLIES: THEATER 1,275.41 1,275.41 187893 03/08/2018 001407 INTER VALLEY POOL SUPPLY POOL CHEMICAL SUPPLIES: VAR 642.58 642.58 INC POOLS 187894 03/08/2018 020005 ISSOKSON, JASON D. Theater Performance: Mar 10, 2018 1,000.00 1,000.00 187895 03/08/2018 012883 JACOB'S HOUSE INC EMPLOYEE CHARITY DONATIONS PAYMENT 40.00 40.00 187896 03/08/2018 018352 JAMES ELLIOTT PERFORMANCE:THEATER 3/8 1,650.00 1,650.00 ENTERTAINMENT, 187897 03/08/2018 015673 JDS VIDEO & MEDIA VIDEO PRODUCTION: ECO DEV 125.00 125.00 PRODUCTIONS 187898 03/08/2018 020008 KELLEY, DANA Theater Performance: Mar 10, 2018 930.00 930.00 187899 03/08/2018 001091 KEYSER MARSTON JAN AFFORDABLE HOUSING 6,146.28 ASSOCIATES INC, ATTN DIANE ANALYSIS:COM DEV CHAMBERS JAN CONSULTANT SVCS UTSP DEV 187900 03/08/2018 020009 KIM, CLARA H. Theater Performance: Mar 10, 2018 187901 03/08/2018 020519 KIM, GRACE 187902 03/08/2018 020396 KINGDOM CAUSES, DBA CITY NET REFUND:BASKETBALL - TINY TOTS 2300.203 REFUND:BASKETBALL - TINY TOTS 2300 12/14-01/13/18 HOMELESS COLLBRTVE SVCS 11/14-12/13/17 HOMELESS COLLBRTVE 01/14-02/13/18 HOMELESS COLLBRTVE 187903 03/08/2018 001282 KNORR SYSTEMS INC VARIOUS CHEMICALS. SPLASH PAD 5,924.38 12,070.66 930.00 930.00 25.00 25.00 50.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 30,000.00 746.00 746.00 187904 03/08/2018 017118 KRACH BREE B, DBA PLANNING COMMISSION GAVEL 65.25 TEMECULA TROPHY & DES NAMETAGS: THEATER 112.56 187905 03/08/2018 000482 LEIGHTON CONSULTING INC 5/1-1/31/18 GEOTECHNICAL SVCS: 734.80 PW06-09 177.81 734.80 Page:8 apChkLst Final Check List 03/08/2018 9:54:35AM CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 9 Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 187906 03/08/2018 020514 LEISURE PLAY SOFTBALL REFUND:SEC DEP:2014 PHBSP BALL 250.00 FIELD 1 REFUND:SEC DEP:2009 SLOWPITCH TO' 1,000.00 1,250.00 187907 03/08/2018 019884 LEONIDA BUILDERS INC OLD TOWN SIDEWALK 39,691.00 IMPROVEMENTS: PW15-06 OLD TOWN SIDEWALK IMPROVEMNTS: F 21,693.44 61,384.44 187908 03/08/2018 013982 M C I COMM SERVICE FEB XXX -0714 GEN USAGE:PD MALL 35.46 ALARM FEB XXX -0346 GENERAL USAGE 33.76 69.22 187909 03/08/2018 004141 MAINTEX INC CLEANING SUPPLIES: VARI FACILITIES 572.39 572.39 187910 03/08/2018 017427 MATCHETT, VIVIAN TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 254.80 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 109.20 364.00 187911 03/08/2018 014392 MC COLLOUGH JILL DENISE, MAR INTERIOR PLANTSCAPE - CIVIC 500.00 DBA TEMECULA PLANTSCAPE CTR MAR INTERIOR PLANTSCAPE - LIBRARY 200.00 700.00 187912 03/08/2018 018675 MDG ASSOCIATES INC JAN CDBG ADMIN SVCS 5,913.75 5,913.75 187913 03/08/2018 019823 MERCHANTS BLDG MAINT LLC JAN JANITORIAL SVCS:VARI 20,665.99 20,665.99 FACILITIES 187915 03/08/2018 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE DENTAL HMO PAYMENT 10,914.89 10,914.89 COMPANY 187916 03/08/2018 018314 MICHAEL BAKER 11/01-01/28/18 EIR:TEM CREEK INN 21,293.57 INTERNATIONAL DEV P/E 1/28/18 ENG SUPPORT SVCS: PW04- 10,959.50 32,253.07 187917 03/08/2018 012962 MILLER MISTY, DBA: BOOT TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 292.60 CAMP WITH A KICK TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 425.60 718.20 187918 03/08/2018 004043 MISSION ELECTRIC SUPPLY ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: VAR PARKS 70.74 70.74 INC 187919 03/08/2018 001868 MIYAMOTO-JURKOSKY, SUSAN TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 371.00 ANN 187920 03/08/2018 016445 MKB PRINTING & PROMOTIONAL INC, DBA MINUTEMAN PRESS 187921 03/08/2018 004040 MORAMARCO, ANTHONY J, DBA BIGFOOT GRAPHICS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS BUSINESS CARDS - PARKS & FACILITIES 339.20 339.21 1,049.41 485.00 BUSINESS CARDS & STATIONERY:ADMIr 37.52 PRINTING SRVCS:BUILDING & SAFETY 149.23 PRINTING SRVCS:CODE ENFORCEMENT 48.99 720.74 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 42.00 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 385.00 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 192.50 619.50 Page9 apChkLst Final Check List 03/08/2018 9:54:35AM CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 10 Bank : union UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Description Amount Paid Check Total 187922 03/08/2018 002925 NAPA AUTO PARTS MISC SUPPLIES: ST MAINT DIV 187923 03/08/2018 014391 NICHOLS, KELLIE D TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 187924 03/08/2018 019839 O'CONNOR, DENISE TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 74.07 74.07 450.45 327.60 378.00 403.20 176.40 160.65 100.80 378.00 428.40 151.20 2,954.70 105.00 105.00 187925 03/08/2018 003964 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SVS OFFICE SUPPLIES: HR 37.26 DIV OFFICE SUPPLIES: HR 18.69 OFFICE SUPPLIES: HR 264.00 319.95 187926 03/08/2018 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE AND SERVICE CITY VEHICLE MAINT SVCS:PW PARKS 1,663.38 MAINT CITY VEHICLE MAINT SVCS:PW PARKS A 525.41 CITY VEHICLE MAINT SVCS:PW PARKS h 72.63 CITY VEHICLE MAINT SVCS:PW PARKS h 25.51 CITY VEHICLE MAINT SVCS:PW PARKS h 993.50 CITY VEHICLE MAINT SVCS:PW PARKS h 46.82 CITY VEHICLE MAINT SVCS:PW STREET 388.71 3,715.96 187927 03/08/2018 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE AND SERVICE CITY VEHICLE MAINT SVCS:TCSD 389.45 389.45 187928 03/08/2018 002579 POTAMUS PRESS PROGRAM PRINTING 2018 ROD RUN 1,052.18 1,052.18 187929 03/08/2018 005820 PRE -PAID LEGAL SERVICES PREPAID LEGAL SERVICES PAYMENT 336.85 336.85 INC, DBA: LEGALSHIELD 187930 03/08/2018 000254 PRESS ENTERPRISE 26 WEEKS SUBSCR:CITY MGR OFC 223.65 223.65 COMPANY INC 180905647 187931 03/08/2018 005075 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL JAN UNIFORM/FLR MTS/TWL 685.97 685.97 SUPPLY RENTALS:CITY FAC 187932 03/08/2018 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DISTRICT FEB WATER METER:30875 RANCHO VISTA FEB LNDSCP WATER METER:41415 MEA FEB LNDSCP WATER METER:31132 COR FEB LNDSCP WATER METER:DEPORTOL 7.67 14.52 50.62 6.09 78.90 Page:10 apChkLst Final Check List 03/08/2018 9:54:35AM CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 11 Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 187933 03/08/2018 013632 RELIANCE CHURCH REFUND:SEC DEP:RM RENTAL:CONF CTR A/B 187934 03/08/2018 000418 RIVERSIDE CO CLERK & NTC EXEMPTION R.C. RD ASPHALT RECORDER REHAB 187935 03/08/2018 012251 ROTH, DONALD J TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 187936 03/08/2018 020523 SENIOR SOFTBALL USA REFUND:TOURNAMENT FEES DUE TO RAINOUT 187937 03/08/2018 020529 SERVICELINK LLC REFUND:OVERPMT COVARRUBIAS PAYOFF 187938 03/08/2018 008529 SHERIFFS CIVIL DIV WAGE GARNISHMENT PAYMENT CENTRAL 187939 03/08/2018 013695 SHRED -IT US JV, LLC 1/23, 2/7 DOC SHRED SRVCS:CITY 187940 03/08/2018 000645 SMART AND FINAL INC 187941 03/08/2018 013480 SO CALAAU BASEBALL FACS THEATER HOSPITALITY & OFFICE SUPPLIES REFRESHMENTS & SUPPLIES:ROD RUN REFUND:SEC DEP:PHBSP BALL FIELD 4 REFUND:SEC DEP:BASEBALLTOURNAM 200.00 200.00 50.00 50.00 112.00 112.00 250.00 250.00 367.07 367.07 50.00 50.00 105.93 105.93 91.43 140.25 250.00 1,000.00 231.68 1,250.00 Page:11 apChkLst Final Check List 03/08/2018 9:54:35AM CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 12 Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor 187942 03/08/2018 000537 SO CALIF EDISON Description Amount Paid Check Total FEB 2-29-295-3510:32211 WOLF VLY RD 970.02 FEB 2-30-520-4414:32781 TEM PKWY LS3 1,118.31 FEB 2-34-333-3589:41702 MAIN ST 25.98 FEB 2-31-912-7494:28690 MERCEDES ST 1,503.51 FEB 2-31-536-3655:41904 MAIN ST 915.31 FEB 2-31-536-3481:41902 MAIN ST 149.61 FEB 2-32-903-8293:41000 MAIN ST 13,210.25 FEB 2-00-397-5042:43200 BUS PARK DR t 3,049.12 FEB 2-29-223-8607:42035 2ND ST PED 538.79 FEB 2-39-732-3171:41997 MARGARITA RC 26.50 FEB 2-35-707-0010:33451 S HWY-79 PED 51.70 FEB 2-21-981-4720:30153 TEM PKWY TPF 21.80 FEB 2-28-904-7706:32329 OVERLAND TRI 157.40 FEB 2-29-224-0173:32364 OVERLAND TRI 1,515.29 FEB 2-35-164-3242:44270 MEADOWS PK1, 25.70 FEB 2-31-031-2616:27991 DIAZ RD PED 25.46 FEB 2-29-953-8082:31523 WOLF VLY RD 30.16 FEB 2-29-953-8249:46497 WOLF CREEK C 29.04 FEB 2-31-419-2873:43000 HWY-395 24.89 FEB 2-19-171-8568:28300 MERCEDES ST 583.27 FEB 2-18-937-3152:28314 MERCEDES ST 605.36 FEB 2-14-204-1615:30027 FRONT ST RDI( 36.16 FEB 2-02-351-4946:41845 6TH ST 917.34 FEB 2-25-393-4681:41951 MORAGA RD 636.82 FEB 2-35-403-6337:41375 MCCABE CT 1,166.44 FEB 2-35-664-9053:29119 MARGARITA RE 543.04 FEB 2-29-933-3831:43230 BUS PARK DR 1,715.42 FEB 2-31-282-0665:27407 DIAZ RD PED 25.58 FEB 2-29-807-1226:28077 DIAZ RD PED 25.18 FEB 2-29-807-1093:28079 DIAZ RD PED 25.18 FEB 2-29-657-2787:41638 WINCHESTER 24.89 FEB 2-35-164-3770:43487 BUTTERFIELD : 27.53 FEB 2-35-164-3663:42335 MEADOWS PKC 25.97 FEB 2-35-164-3515:32932 LEENA WAY 25.97 29,772.99 Page:12 apChkLst Final Check List 03/0812018 9:54:35AM CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 13 Bank : union UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor 187943 03/08/2018 001212 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY (Continued) Description Amount Paid Check Total FEB 117-188-6393-6:32131 S LOOP RD FEB 101-525-1560-6:27415 ENTERPRISE FEB 098-255-9828-8:29119 MARGARITA R FEB 026-671-2909-8:42051 MAIN ST FEB 101-525-0950-0:28816 PUJOL ST FEB 021-725-0775-4:41845 6TH ST FEB 181-383-8881-6:28314 MERCEDES S JAN 196-025-0344-3:42081 MAIN ST FEB 129-535-4236-7:41000 MAIN ST FEB 129-582-9784-3:43230 BUS PARK DR FEB 133-040-7373-0:43210 BUS PARK DR FEB 091-024-9300-5:30875 RANCHO VIST FEB 028-025-1468-3:41375 MCCABE CT 187944 03/08/2018 020528 SOCAL FIRE PREVENTION PUBLIC DISPLAY FIREWORKS REG 4/3 OFFICERS MA/JH 187945 03/08/2018 017142 SOCCER TOURNAMENT REFUND:SPORTS - TOURNAMENT DEPOSIT 130.19 131.89 92.69 273.01 114.13 227.01 206.49 166.29 1,587.96 178.50 18.04 3,084.77 52.55 6,263.52 80.00 80.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 187946 03/08/2018 002503 SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY FY 17/18 FLAT FEE/PRIOR YR 127.46 EMISSIONS:C.0 FY 17/18ANN'LOPERATING FEES:CIVIC 378.28 505.74 187947 03/08/2018 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST PEST CONTROL SRVCS:THEATER 94.00 CONTROL INC PEST CONTROL SRVCS:MARG SPLASH I 240.00 334.00 187948 03/08/2018 000293 STADIUM PIZZA INC REFRESHMENTS: WORKFORCE 2/7 41.89 REFRESHMENTS: WORKFORCE 2/6 151.37 REFRESHMENTS: WORKFORCE 1/24 51.50 244.76 187952 03/08/2018 007762 STANDARD INSURANCE BASIC LIFE INSURANCE PAYMENT COMPANY 187953 03/08/2018 012723 STANDARD INSURANCE VOLUNTARY SUPP LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY PAYMENT 187954 03/08/2018 003000 STATE WATER RESOURCE FY 17/18 DREDGE & FILL NPDES CONTROL 9000003023 187955 03/08/2018 016262 STEVE ADAMIAK GOLF INSTRUCTION 8,448.87 8,448.87 1,124.62 1,124.62 200.00 200.00 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190.40 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 187956 03/08/2018 001546 STRAIGHT LINE GLASS AND GLASS REPAIRS: LIBRARY MIRROR, COMPANY INC 504.00 672.00 420.00 1,786.40 2,800.00 2,800.00 Page:13 apChkLst Final Check List 03/08/2018 9:54:35AM CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 14 Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 187957 03/08/2018 009061 STURDIVANT, ANGELA P. TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 187958 03/08/2018 013387 SWEEPING UNLIMITED INC FEB SWEEPING SRVCS: PARKING GARAGE 708.40 708.40 540.00 540.00 187959 03/08/2018 020520 TAPANES, MARLENE REFUND:SEC DEP:RM RENTAL:TCC 200.00 200.00 187960 03/08/2018 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 UNION DUES PAYMENT 5,037.00 5,037.00 187961 03/08/2018 011275 TEM. VLY GIRLS SOFTBALL REFUND:SEC DEP:2011 TOURNAMENT 1,000.00 1,000.00 ASSOC. 187962 03/08/2018 020515 TEMECULA VALLEY SOCCER REFUND:SEC DEP:TOURNAMENTS 1,000.00 ASSOC 187963 03/08/2018 020512 TOPP'S SPORTS INC REFUND:SEC DEP:PHBSP SOCCER FIEL 1,000.00 2,000.00 REFUND:SEC DEP:TOURNAMENTS 1,000.00 REFUND:SEC DEP:PHBSP BALL FIELD 1 187964 03/08/2018 004124 TRUELINE CONSTRUCTION & CRACK REPAIR & CAULKING: SKATE PARK 187965 03/08/2018 007766 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT, OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA FEB UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATOR ALERTS:P 187966 03/08/2018 014486 VERIZON WIRELESS 1/16-2/15 CELLULAR/BROADBAND USAGE 187967 03/08/2018 020521 VINOLE, MARY ANN REFUND:SEC DEP:KITCHEN RENTAL:CRC 187968 03/08/2018 020275 WALLACE & ASSOC JAN 1 -FEB 4, '18 CONSTR CONSULTING INC MGMT:PARK&RIDE 187969 03/08/2018 001342 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY INC CLEANING SUPPLIES:VARIOUS PARKS CLEANING SUPPLIES:VARIOUS PARKS CLEANING SUPPLIES:CITY FACS 187970 03/08/2018 003730 WEST COAST ARBORISTS INC 2/1-15/18 TREE MAINT:PARKS & MEDIANS 2/1-15/18 TREE MAINT:ROW TREES 1/16-31/18 TREE MAINT:ROW TREES 2/1-15/18 TREE MAINT:CROWNE HILL SL( 2/1-15/18 TREE MAINT:WOLF CREEK SLC 187971 03/08/2018 020011 WHANG, JOANN J THEATER PERFORMANCE: MAR 10, 2018 250.00 1,250.00 2,212.00 2,212.00 214.60 214.60 6,979.03 6,979.03 200.00 200.00 5,304.00 5,304.00 193.18 61.16 362.83 1,140.00 3,515.00 12, 001.00 12, 015.00 11, 926.00 617.17 40,597.00 930.00 930.00 Page:14 apChkLst Final Check List 03/08/2018 9:54:35AM CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 15 Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 187972 03/08/2018 000341 WILLDAN ASSOCIATES INC JUN '17 TRAFFIC ENG SRVCS:BTRFLD 9,815.00 9,815.00 STG RD 1001982 02/28/2018 018343 GARCIA, LYDIA REFUND:CREDIT ON ACCT:TCSD 48.00 48.00 1001983 02/28/2018 020524 HINOSTROZA, MAIRA REFUND:SEC DEP: RM RENTAL:TCC 200.00 200.00 1001984 02/28/2018 020525 RODRIGUEZ, CRISTIN REFUND:CREDIT ON ACCT:TCSD 44.00 44.00 1001985 02/28/2018 020526 MARASCO, TERESA REFUND:CREDIT ON ACCT:TCSD 376.20 376.20 Grand total for UNION BANK: 1,143,614.99 Page:15 apChkLst Final Check List 03/08/2018 9:54:35AM CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 16 163 checks in this report. Grand Total All Checks. 1,143, 614.99 Page:16 Item No. 4 Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Jennifer Hennessy, Director of Finance DATE: March 27, 2018 SUBJECT: Approve the City Treasurer's Report as of January 31, 2018 PREPARED BY: Rudy J. Graciano, Fiscal Services Manager RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve and file the City Treasurer's Report as of January 31, 2018. BACKGROUND: Government Code Sections 53646 and 41004 require reports to the City Council regarding the City's investment portfolio, receipts, and disbursements respectively. Adequate funds will be available to meet budgeted and actual expenditures of the City for the next six months. Current market values are derived from the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) reports, Union Bank of California trust and custody statements, and from US Bank trust statements. Attached is the City Treasurer's Report that provides this information. The City's investment portfolio is in compliance with the statement of investment policy and Government Code Sections 53601 and 53635 as of January 31, 2018. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: City Treasurer's Report as of January 31, 2018 Cash and Investments Report CITY OF TEMECULA Through January 2018 Fund # Fund Name Beginning Balance Receipts Disbursements Fund Total 001 GENERAL FUND $ 35,106,654.29 $ 12,932,690.92 $ 13,359,394.76 $ 34,679,950.45 002 MEASURE S FUND 2,099,785.18 2,246,563.07 990,086.88 3,356,261.37 100 STATE GAS TAX FUND 203,274.29 341,756.05 545,030.34 - 102 RMRA-ROAD MAINTENANCE REHABILITATION ACT 18,724.64 9.64 18,715.00 120 DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FUND 5,301,927.99 152,064.80 2,807.39 5,451,185.40 125 PEG PUBLIC EDUCATION & GOVERNMENT 306,398.23 9,621.14 20,809.81 295,209.56 145 TEMECULA ENERGY EFFICIENCY ASSET TEAM 198,024.33 393.74 102.13 198,315.94 150 AB 2766 FUND 25,264.36 222.35 13.12 25,473.59 160 SUPPLEMENTAL LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES 8,291.54 8,461,48 16,753.02 161 TEMECULA MAJOR CRIMES REWARD FUND 25,701.97 61.78 13.26 25,750.49 165 AFFORDABLE HOUSING 750,355.91 127,621.24 29,012.45 848,964.70 170 MEASURE A FUND 3,372,632.24 219,416.93 64,831.50 3,527,217.67 190 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 107,797.22 2,518,305.01 1,822,763.67 803,338.56 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "B" STREET LIGHTS - 322,008.00 74,262.39 247,745.61 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "D" REFUSE/RECYCLING 360,411.46 3,979,851.11 13,770.09 4,326,492.48 195 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "R" STREET/ROAD MAINT 23,730.49 2,923.57 13.72 26,640.34 196 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "L" LAKE PARK MAINT. 277,921.29 123,609.83 20,973.02 380,558.10 197 TEMECULA LIBRARY FUND 169,910.13 14,189.05 97,209.26 86,889.92 198 PUBLIC ART 100,570.25 1,243.95 7,248.70 94,565.50 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FUND 13,670,225.73 796,705.57 1,609,991.54 12,856,939.76 275 CFD 03-3 WOLF CREEK IMPROVEMENT FUND 298,713.91 269.19 298,983.10 277 CFD-RORIPAUGH 16,369,645.25 58,731.88 70.69 16,428,306.44 278 CFD-RORIPAUGH II 6,446,000.93 5,808.91 - 6,451,809.84 300 INSURANCE FUND 150,470.48 277,080.96 10,247.66 417,303.78 305 WORKER'S COMPENSATION 975,203.53 131,296.45 58,470.00 1,048,029.98 310 VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT FUND 1,786,691.78 22,003.18 931.01 1,807,763.95 320 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY - 354,925.43 169,073.20 185,852.23 325 TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT FUND 337,832.06 510,603.19 24,807.83 823,627.42 330 CENTRAL SERVICES 378,817.38 72,268.29 17,230.82 433,854.85 340 FACILITIES 352,373.28 252,930.87 91,895.72 513,408.43 380 SARDA DEBT SERVICE FUND 97,155,925.19 1,477,380.76 53,337,475.82 45,295,830.13 381 REDEVELOPMEN PROPERTY TAX TRUST - 3,958,294.82 981,535.98 2,976,758.84 460 CFD 88-12 DEBT SERVICE FUND 90,228.30 128.04 46.51 90,309.83 472 CFD 01-2 HARVESTON A&B DEBT SERVICE 607,807.23 520,988.87 439.96 1,128,356.14 473 CFD 03-1 CROWNE HILL DEBT SERVICE FUND 1,763,851.76 430,887.60 9,182.95 2,185,556.41 474 AD 03-4 JOHN WARNER ROAD DEBT SERVICE 70,080.42 56,206.76 191.16 126,096.02 475 CFD 03-3 WOLF CREEK DEBT SERVICE FUND 1,991,936.06 983,897.82 839.25 2,974,994.63 476 CFD 03-6 HARVESTON 2 DEBT SERVICE FUND 360,072.88 164,480.70 257.11 524,296.47 477 CFD 03-02 RORIPAUGH DEBT SERVICE FUND 806,729.59 390,691.42 384.67 1,197,036.34 478 CFD-RORIPAUGH II 3,206,254.98 1,873,529.65 2,050.75 5,077,733.88 501 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 1 SADDLEWOOD 19,599.88 9,908.51 9,691.37 502 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 2 WINCHESTER CREEK 62,452.06 21,990.32 2,608.23 81,834.15 503 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 3 RANCHO HIGHLANDS 25,160.59 2,492.33 22,668.26 504 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 4 THE VINEYARDS 742.23 3,320.48 539.86 3,522.85 505 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 5 SIGNET SERIES 3,344.78 21,184.27 2,843.09 21,685.96 506 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 6 WOODCREST COUNTRY 12,710.09 13,350.32 1,367.34 24,693.07 508 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 8 VILLAGE GROVE 27,860.91 71,333.46 4,564.16 94,630.21 509 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 9 RANCHO SOLANA 21,301.67 2,683.62 308.48 23,676.81 510 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 10 MARTINIQUE 6,291.64 5,738.63 1,781.29 10,248.98 511 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 11 MEADOWVIEW 1,316.92 1,141.40 194.57 2,263.75 512 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 12 VINTAGE HILLS 43,052.34 49,689.39 4,151.11 88,590.62 513 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 13 PRESLEY DEVELOP 3,156.04 17,330.92 863.35 19,623.61 514 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 14 MORRISON HOMES 7,962.61 1,626.55 6,336.06 515 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 15 BARCLAY ESTATES 38.29 4,978.07 766.18 4,250.18 516 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 16TRADEWINDS 31,996.55 19,079.05 532.15 50,543.45 517 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 17 MONTE VISTA 181.87 982.14 185.21 978.80 518 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 18 TEMEKU HILLS 3,539.21 50,546.62 7,111.21 46,974.62 519 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 19 CHANTEMAR 68,373.42 29,585.09 3,253.21 94,705.30 520 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 20 CROWNE HILL 85,223.29 91,083.50 3,223.81 173,082.98 521 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 21 VAIL RANCH 98,803.70 116,768.43 4,167.63 211,404.50 522 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 22 SUTTON PLACE 3,708.28 2,122.76 297.65 5,533.39 523 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 23 PHEASENT RUN 10,884.89 3,896.01 142.06 14,638.84 524 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 24 HARVESTON 3,756.70 94,860.18 31,505.78 67,111.10 525 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 25 SERENA HILLS 30,010.99 22,864.55 3,370.53 49,505.01 526 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 26 GALLERYTRADITION 11.37 954.73 80.40 885.70 527 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 27 AVONDALE 3,934.85 4,851.27 926.94 7,859.18 528 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 28 WOLF CREEK 314,530.89 120,022.38 4,240.75 430,312.52 530 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 30 FUTURE ZONES 34,299.29 79.54 17.70 34,361.13 Grand Total: $ 196,129,034.18 $ 36,181,999.23 $ 73,473,297.86 $ 158,837,735.55 Journal Entries completed atter December's Treasurer's Report was issued are reflected in the Receipts / Disbursements columns. Investments Managed Pool Accounts Retention Escrow Account Letter of Credit Local Agency Investment Funds Federal Agency Callable Securities Federal Agency Bullet Securities Investments City of Temecula, California Portfolio Management Portfolio Summary January 31, 2018 City of Temecula 41000 Main Street P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92590 (951)694-6430 Par Market Book % of Days to YTM YTM Value Value Value Portfolio Term Maturity 360 Equiv. 365 Equiv. 43,250,538.99 43,250,538.99 43,250,538.99 27.33 1 1 1.244 1.261 33,915,076.03 33,915,076.03 33,915,076.03 21.43 1 1 1.504 1.525 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 1 1 0.000 0.000 49,081,720.16 48,988,147.28 49,081,720.16 31.02 1 1 1.332 1.350 23,000,000.00 22,674,850.00 23,000,000.00 14.53 1,291 825 1.534 1.556 9,000,000.00 8,927,130.00 9,000,000.00 5.69 996 455 1.374 1.393 158,247,337.18 157,755,744.30 158,247,337.18 100.00% 245 147 1.377 1.396 Cash Passbook/Checking (not included in yield calculations) Total Cash and Investments 1,081,991.25 1,081,991.25 1,081,991.25 1 1 0.000 0.000 159,329,328.43 158,837,735.55 159,329,328.43 245 147 1.377 1.396 Total Earnings January 31 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date Current Year Average Daily Balance Effective Rate of Return 160,011.14 149,636,003.92 1.26% Reporting period 01/01/2018-01/31/2018 Run Date: 02/27/2018 - 16:34 812,834.18 136,016,031.62 1.01% Portfolio TEME CP PM (PRF_PM1) 7.3.0 Report Ver. 7.3.6.1 CUSIP Investment # Managed Pool Accounts 233358006-6 233358000-6 276213009-6 276213008-6 276213006-6 164741008-6 164741006-6 164741000-6 164742000-6 229462007-6 229462009-6 229462006-6 229462000-6 94669921-6 94669911-6 94669917-6 94669916-6 94669000-6 276213002-6 276213000-6 94686001-6 94686005-6 94686000-6 94686006-6 276213022-6 276213023-6 276213029-6 276213028-6 276213026-6 276213020-6 218848008-6 218848013-2 218848009-6 233358009-6 94434160-6 94434161-6 Run Date: 02/27/2018 - 16:30 Issuer Average Balance City of Temecula, California Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments January 31, 2018 Page 1 Purchase Stated YTM YTM Days to Maturity Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate 360 365 Maturity Date 01-2 REF RES First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 507,065.03 507,065.03 507,065.03 1.200 1.184 1.200 1 01-2 REF ST First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 69,314.37 69,314.37 69,314.37 1.200 1.184 1.200 1 03-02 COI First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 03-02 IMPR First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 1,141,206.79 1,141,206.79 1,141,206.79 1.200 1.184 1.200 1 03-02 RES First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 744,633.79 744,633.79 744,633.79 1.200 1.184 1.200 1 03-03IMP First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 298,983.10 298,983.10 298,983.10 1.200 1.184 1.200 1 03-03RES First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 392.62 392.62 392.62 1.200 1.184 1.200 1 03-03SPEC First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 194,581.37 194,581.37 194,581.37 1.200 1.184 1.200 1 03-06SPEC First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 13,878.45 13,878.45 13,878.45 1.200 1.184 1.200 1 03-1 2012 RF First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 07/01/2017 41.52 41.52 41.52 1.200 1.184 1.200 1 03-1 COI First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 07/31/2017 13,582.37 13,582.37 13,582.37 1.200 1.184 1.200 1 03-1 RESERV First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 07/31/2017 17,291.41 17,291.41 17,291.41 1.200 1.184 1.200 1 03-1 SPECF First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 07/31/2017 22,327.87 22,327.87 22,327.87 1.200 1.184 1.200 1 03-1ACQ11 First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.870 0.858 0.870 1 03-1ACQA11 First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 03-1 RES First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 07/01/2017 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 03-1 RESB11 First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 03-1SPTAX11 First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 03-2 REFU First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 08/01/2017 2,786.17 2,786.17 2,786.17 1.200 1.184 1.200 1 03-2 SPEC First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 5,001.44 5,001.44 5,001.44 1.200 1.184 1.200 1 03-4ADMIN11 First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 512.46 512.46 512.46 1.200 1.184 1.200 1 03-4PREP11 First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 13.10 13.10 13.10 1.220 1.203 1.220 1 03-4RED11 First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 31,924.15 31,924.15 31,924.15 1.200 1.184 1.200 1 03-4RES11 First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 34,132.75 34,132.75 34,132.75 1.200 1.184 1.200 1 16-01 BOND F First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 08/01/2017 12,623.89 12,623.89 12,623.89 1.200 1.184 1.200 1 16-01 CAPINT First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.870 0.858 0.870 1 16-01 COI First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 16-01 IMP First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 6,451,809.84 6,451,809.84 6,451,809.84 1.200 1.184 1.200 1 16-01 RESERV First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 3,165,353.25 3,165,353.25 3,165,353.25 1.200 1.184 1.200 1 16-01 SPECF First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 07/01/2017 2,337.12 2,337.12 2,337.12 1.200 1.184 1.200 1 2017ABPRIORP First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 12/01/2017 211,483.84 211,483.84 211,483.84 1.200 1.184 1.200 1 2017B COI First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 12/01/2017 16,627.90 16,627.90 16,627.90 1.200 1.184 1.200 1 2017B_PROJ First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 12/01/2017 12,592,019.01 12,592,019.01 12,592,019.01 1.200 1.184 1.200 1 233358009-6 First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 RDA-02INT First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 RDA-02PRIN First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 Portfolio TEME CP PM (PRF PM2) 7.3.0 Report Ver. 7.3.6.1 CUSIP Investment # Issuer City of Temecula, California Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments January 31, 2018 Average Purchase Balance Date Par Value Market Value Page 2 Stated YTM YTM Days to Maturity Book Value Rate 360 365 Maturity Date Managed Pool Accounts 107886000-6 RDA-O6AINT First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 107886001-6 RDA06APRIN First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 07/01/2017 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 107886010-6 RDA06BINT First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 107886011-6 RDA06BPRIN First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 07/01/2017 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.680 0.671 0.680 1 107886016-6 RDA06BRES First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.940 0.927 0.940 1 107886020-6 RDA07INT First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 107886021-6 RDAO7PRIN First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.930 0.917 0.930 1 107886028-6 RDA07PROJ First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.940 0.927 0.940 1 107886026-6 RDAO7RES First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.940 0.927 0.940 1 136343008-6 RDA10APROJ First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 136343018-6 RDA10BPROJ First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 136343000-6 RDA1OINT First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 1 3634 3001-6 RDA1OPRIN First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 07/01/2017 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 136343006-6 RDA1ORSRV First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 146161000-6 RDA11AINT First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 1 461 61 001-6 RDA11APRIN First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 94669902-3 03-1 BOND3 First American Treasury 07/01/2017 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 94434160-1 RDA 02 INT1 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.010 0.010 0.010 1 94434161-2 RDA 02 PRIN2 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.010 0.010 0.010 1 136343018-2 RDA 10B CIP2 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.010 0.010 0.010 1 1 461 61008-3 RDA11APROJ Federated Institutional Tax Fr 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.800 0.789 0.800 1 146161006-3 RDA11ARSRV Federated Institutional Tax Fr 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 94669921-5 03-01 ACQ11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.250 0.247 0.250 1 94669911-5 03-01 ACQA11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.250 0.247 0.250 1 94669917-5 03-01 RES Federated Tax Free Obligations 07/01/2017 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 94669906-5 03-01 RESA11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.001 0.001 0.001 1 94669916-5 03-01 RESB11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.250 0.247 0.250 1 94669000-5 03-01 SPTAX11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.250 0.247 0.250 1 164742006-5 03-06 RES Federated Tax Free Obligations 07/01/2017 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 164742000-5 03-06 SPEC Federated Tax Free Obligations 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.250 0.247 0.250 1 94669902-5 03 -/bond fd Federated Tax Free Obligations 07/01/2017 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 94686001-5 03-4 ADMIN11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.250 0.247 0.250 1 94686005-5 03-4 PREP11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 07/01/2017 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 94686006-5 03-4 RES11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.250 0.247 0.250 1 94669917-1 03-01-1 RES CA Local Agency Investment Fun 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.350 1.332 1.350 1 276213008-1 03-02 IMP CA Local Agency Investment Fun 15,149,839.34 15,149,839.34 15,149,839.34 1.350 1.332 1.350 1 Run Date: 02/27/2018 - 16:30 Portfolio TEME CP PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 CUSIP Investment # Issuer Average Balance City of Temecula, California Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments January 31, 2018 Purchase Date Par Value Market Value Stated Book Value Rate Page 3 YTM YTM Days to Maturity 360 365 Maturity Date Managed Pool Accounts 164742006-1 229462007-1 94669911-1 94669921-1 744727011-1 164741006-1 107886028-1 107886026-1 136343018-1 229462020-0 233358050-1 03-06 RES -1 CA Local Agency Investment Fun 03-1 2012 RE CA Local Agency Investment Fun 03-1 ACQ A2 CA Local Agency Investment Fun 03-1 ACQ B2 CA Local Agency Investment Fun 03-3 ACQ 2 CA Local Agency Investment Fun 0303-1 RES CA Local Agency Investment Fun RDA 07 PRO -1 CA Local Agency Investment Fun RDA 07 RES -1 CA Local Agency Investment Fun RDA 10B CIP1 CA Local Agency Investment Fun 03-01 CASH USBANK 01-2 SPECESC U.S. Treasury Subtotal and Average 43,216,801.33 07/01/2017 07/01/2017 313,497.10 313,497.10 783,742.77 783,742.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,452,741.49 1, 452, 741.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 794.68 794.68 0.00 0.00 43,250,538.99 43,250,538.99 313,497.10 783,742.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,452,741.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 794.68 0.00 43,250,538.99 1.350 1.332 1.350 1 1.350 1.332 1.350 1 1.350 1.332 1.350 1 1.350 1.332 1.350 1 1.350 1.332 1.350 1 1.350 1.332 1.350 1 1.350 1.332 1.350 1 1.350 1.332 1.350 1 1.350 1.332 1.350 1 0.000 0.000 1 0.360 0.355 0.360 1 1.244 1.261 1 Retention Escrow Account ARMY CORPS Army Corps Union Bank 218848050-0 2002 ESCROW USBANK 218848060-0 2006AESCRO USBANK 218848070-0 2006BESCRO USBANK 218848080-0 2007ESCROW USBANK 146161020-0 2011A CASH USBANK 146161020-2 2011A TREAS USBANK 136343020-0 RDA10B CASH USBANK 229462020-2 03-01 ESCROW U.S. Treasury 136343020-2 RDA1OBTREAS U.S. Treasury Subtotal and Average 35,647,247.06 12/01/2017 12/01/2017 12/01/2017 12/01/2017 12/01/2017 12/01/2017 12/01/2017 07/31/2017 12/01/2017 601, 249.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 532,409.09 18,022,433.38 467,386.36 858,752.93 13,432,844.77 601,249.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 532,409.09 18,022,433.38 467,386.36 858,752.93 13,432,844.77 33,915,076.03 33,915,076.03 601,249.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 532,409.09 18,022,433.38 467,386.36 858, 752.93 13,432,844.77 33,915,076.03 0.150 0.148 0.150 1 0.000 0.000 1 0.000 0.000 1 0.000 0.000 1 0.000 0.000 1 0.000 0.000 1 1.640 1.618 1.640 1 0.000 0.000 1 0.063 0.062 0.063 1 1.640 1.618 1.640 1 1.504 1.525 1 Letter of Credit 218848006-1 233358006-1 2017B RESER 01-2 REFRESI ASSURED GUARANTY MUNICIPAL COR 12/01/2017 1.00 ASSURANCE CO BOND INSURANCE 07/01/2017 1.00 Subtotal and Average 3.65 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.000 0.000 1 1.00 0.000 0.000 1 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.000 0.000 1 Local Agency Investment Funds SYSCITY SYSRDA SYSTCSD Run Date: 02/27/2018 - 16:30 CITY RDA TCSD CA Local Agency Investment Fun CA Local Agency Investment Fun CA Local Agency Investment Fun 2,525,057.95 1,783.31 46,554,878.90 2, 520, 244.00 1,779.91 46,466,123.37 2,525,057.95 1,783.31 46,554,878.90 1.350 1.350 1.350 1.332 1.350 1.332 1.350 1.332 1.350 Portfolio TEME CP PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 CUSIP Investment # Issuer Subtotal and Average Average Balance 31,305,831.86 City of Temecula, California Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments January 31, 2018 Purchase Date Par Value Market Value 49,081,720.16 48,988,147.28 Stated Book Value Rate 49,081,720.16 Page 4 YTM YTM Days to Maturity 360 365 Maturity 1.332 1.350 1 Date Federal Agency Callable Securities 3130A4G89 3130AAME5 3130AANA2 3130AAW 38 3130AB3N4 3130ABYY6 3130ACN83 3130ADFV9 3134G67C1 3134G8QB8 3134G8PP8 3134GAXX7 3134GBA88 3134GBGZ9 3134GBNK4 3134GBL42 3134GBR95 3136G2EC7 3136G2WT0 3136G2XH5 3136G3CL7 3136G3TE5 3136G3X59 01207 01226 01227 01228 01231 01235 01238 01241 01210 01219 01220 01224 01229 01232 01234 01237 01239 01205 01216 01217 01218 01221 01222 Federal Home Loan Bank Federal Home Loan Bank Federal Home Loan Bank Federal Home Loan Bank Federal Home Loan Bank Federal Home Loan Bank Federal Home Loan Bank Federal Home Loan Bank Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp Federal National Mtg Assn Federal National Mtg Assn Federal National Mtg Assn Federal National Mtg Assn Federal National Mtg Assn Federal National Mtg Assn Subtotal and Average 22,096,774.19 03/24/2015 1,000,000.00 989,840.00 1,000,000.00 1.650 1.627 1.650 600 09/24/2019 01/30/2017 1,000,000.00 975,430.00 1,000,000.00 2.020 1.948 1.975 1,454 01/25/2022 01/30/2017 1,000,000.00 984,870.00 1,000,000.00 1.750 1.726 1.750 910 07/30/2020 03/22/2017 1,000,000.00 990,010.00 1,000,000.00 1.500 1.479 1.500 1,510 03/22/2022 04/28/2017 1,000,000.00 986,620.00 1,000,000.00 1.550 1.529 1.550 635 10/29/2019 08/24/2017 1,000,000.00 978,020.00 1,000,000.00 1.750 1.726 1.750 1,119 02/24/2021 10/30/2017 1,000,000.00 987,040.00 1,000,000.00 1.700 1.677 1.700 834 05/15/2020 01/29/2018 1,000,000.00 995,910.00 1,000,000.00 2.250 2.219 2.250 1,093 01/29/2021 06/22/2015 1,000,000.00 998,660.00 1,000,000.00 1.200 1.184 1.200 141 06/22/2018 03/29/2016 1,000,000.00 991,540.00 1,000,000.00 1.270 1.253 1.270 421 03/29/2019 03/30/2016 1,000,000.00 980,120.00 1,000,000.00 1.500 1.661 1.684 972 09/30/2020 11/30/2016 1,000,000.00 992,670.00 1,000,000.00 1.000 0.986 1.000 302 11/30/2018 03/27/2017 1,000,000.00 985,040.00 1,000,000.00 1.670 1.647 1.670 785 03/27/2020 04/27/2017 1,000,000.00 978,000.00 1,000,000.00 2.000 1.964 1.991 1,456 01/27/2022 05/30/2017 1,000,000.00 985,520.00 1,000,000.00 1.625 1.603 1.625 848 05/29/2020 09/28/2017 1,000,000.00 980,560.00 1,000,000.00 1.670 1.647 1.670 970 09/28/2020 10/30/2017 1,000,000.00 991,280.00 1,000,000.00 1.625 1.603 1.625 636 10/30/2019 02/27/2015 1,000,000.00 992,650.00 1,000,000.00 1.300 1.282 1.300 391 02/27/2019 01/27/2016 1,000,000.00 986,250.00 1,000,000.00 1.450 1.430 1.450 725 01/27/2020 02/24/2016 1,000,000.00 984,390.00 1,000,000.00 1.400 1.381 1.400 753 02/24/2020 03/24/2016 1,000,000.00 978,560.00 1,000,000.00 1.420 1.401 1.420 966 09/24/2020 06/29/2016 1,000,000.00 977,320.00 1,000,000.00 1.250 1.233 1.250 879 06/29/2020 08/23/2016 1,000,000.00 984,550.00 1,000,000.00 1.100 1.085 1.100 568 08/23/2019 23,000,000.00 22,674,850.00 23,000,000.00 1.534 1.556 825 Federal Agency Bullet Securities 3133EDNDO 3133EEHU7 3133EGJ30 3130A4AJ1 3130A5MH9 3130A8ZV8 3130AAYM4 3130ABDX1 Run Date: 02/27/2018 - 16:30 01196 01202 01225 01206 01211 01223 01230 01233 Federal Farm Credit Bank Federal Farm Credit Bank Federal Farm Credit Bank Federal Home Loan Bank Federal Home Loan Bank Federal Home Loan Bank Federal Home Loan Bank Federal Home Loan Bank 06/11/2014 01/14/2015 11/18/2016 02/27/2015 06/26/2015 08/23/2016 03/14/2017 05/24/2017 0.00 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 1.200 1.179 1.195 11 01/11/2018 995,620.00 1,000,000.00 1.410 1.391 1.410 347 01/14/2019 981,150.00 1,000,000.00 1.100 1.085 1.100 655 11/18/2019 999,910.00 1,000,000.00 1.140 1.124 1.140 26 02/27/2018 994,870.00 1,000,000.00 1.360 1.341 1.360 328 12/26/2018 980,590.00 1,000,000.00 1.000 0.986 1.000 568 08/23/2019 999,740.00 1,000,000.00 1.125 1.110 1.125 41 03/14/2018 991,950.00 1,000,000.00 1.400 1.381 1.400 477 05/24/2019 Portfolio TEME CP PM (PRF PM2) 7.3.0 CUSIP City of Temecula, California Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments January 31, 2018 Page 5 Average Purchase Stated YTM YTM Days to Maturity Investment # Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate 360 365 Maturity Date Federal Agency Bullet Securities 3130AC3F9 01236 Federal Home Loan Bank 08/10/2017 1,000,000.00 3130ADEB4 01240 Federal Home Loan Bank 01/12/2018 1,000,000.00 989,370.00 1,000,000.00 1.420 1.853 1.878 573 08/28/2019 993,930.00 1,000,000.00 2.125 2.096 2.125 1,076 01/12/2021 Subtotal and Average 8,967,741.94 9,000,000.00 8,927,130.00 9,000,000.00 1.374 1.393 455 Run Date: 02/27/2018 - 16:30 Total and Average 149,636,003.92 158,247,337.18 157,755,744.30 158,247,337.18 1.377 1.396 147 Portfolio TEME CP PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 CUSIP Investment * Issuer Average Balance City of Temecula, California Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Cash January 31, 2018 Purchase Date Par Value Passbook/Checking Accounts 1453718479 SYSPetty Cash SYSGen Ck Acct SYSParking Ck WORKERS COMP BANK OF AMERICA MERRILL LYNC Petty Cash City of Temecula Gen Ck Acct Union Bank of California PARKING CITA Union Bank of California Average Balance 0.00 07/01/2017 07/01/2017 07/01/2017 26,505.57 3,311.00 1,044,370.93 7,803.75 Market Value 26,505.57 3,311.00 1,044,370.93 7,803.75 Stated Book Value Rate YTM YTM Days to 360 365 Maturity Page 6 26,505.57 3,311.00 1,044,370.93 7,803.75 0.000 0.000 1 0.000 0.000 1 0.000 0.000 1 0.000 0.000 1 Total Cash and Investments 149,636,003.92 Run Dale: 02/27/2018 - 16:30 159, 329, 328.43 158, 837, 735.55 159,329,328.43 1.377 1.398 147 Portfolio TEME CP PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 Item No. 5 Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Charlie DeHart, Division Chief DATE: March 27, 2018 SUBJECT: Approve an Agreement with Raceway Ford, Inc. for the Purchase of Four (4) 2018 4X4 Ford Escapes PREPARED BY: Wendy Miller, Administrative Assistant RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve an Agreement with Raceway Ford, Inc., in the amount of $103,716, for the purchase of four (4) 2018 4X4 Ford Escapes. BACKGROUND: On October 02, 2017 the Fire Department electronically opened and publicly posted on the City of Temecula's online bidding service, Planetbids, a Request for Quotes (RFQ) for the purchase of five (5) 2018 4X4 Ford Escapes. We received one (1) responsive bid on or before October 20, 2017, submission deadline. The solicitation included the City's local preference program; however, it did not impact the award of the purchase. Raceway Ford, Inc was the only responsive bidder. FISCAL IMPACT: The purchase amount of the four (4) 2018 Ford Escape 4X4 is funded with Measure S revenue and included in Fiscal Year 2017-18 Annual Operating Budget. ATTACHMENTS: Agreement AGREEMENT FOR PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT BETWEEN CITY OF TEMECULA AND RACEWAY FORD 2018 FORD 4X4 ESCAPE FLEET VEHICLES THIS AGREEMENT is made and effective as of March 27, 2018 between the City of Temecula , a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and Raceway Ford, Inc. a Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Vendor"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. TERM This Agreement shall commence on March 27, 2018, and shall remain and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event Tater than June 30, 2018, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement. 2. PURCHASE AND SALE OF EQUIPMENT On and subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement and the Agreement Documents, Vendor agrees to sell and deliver to City four (4) Ford 4X4 Escape vehicles, as more particularly described in Exhibit A, Description of Equipment / Scope of Work (hereafter "Equipment"), attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. 3. PURCHASE PRICE The Purchase Price which City agrees to pay to Vendor for the Equipment is One Hundred and three thousand, seven hundred and sixteen Dollars and zero cents ($103,716.00). The Purchase Price is final and shall be paid by City to Vendor within thirty (30) days upon receipt of non -disputed invoice. 4. REPRESENTATION AND WARRANTIES OF VENDOR Vendor makes the following representations and warranties to City: a. Authority and Consents. Vendor has the right, power, legal capacity and authority to enter into and perform its obligations under this Agreement. No approvals or consents of any persons are necessary in connection with Vendor's execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement, except for such as have been obtained on or prior to the date hereof. The execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement by Vendor have been duly authorized by all necessary action on the part of Vendor and constitute the legal, valid and binding obligations of Vendor, enforceable against Vendor in accordance with their respective terms. b. Title, License and Operating Condition. Vendor has good and marketable title to all of the Equipment. All of the Equipment is free and clear of any restrictions on or conditions to transfer or assignment, and City will acquire absolute title to all of the Equipment free and clear of mortgages, liens, pledges, charges, encumbrances, equities, claims, covenants, conditions and restrictions except for such as may be created or granted by City. All of the Equipment is in good operating condition, is free of any defects, and is in conformity with the specifications, descriptions, representations and warranties set forth in the Agreement Documents. Vendor is aware that City is purchasing the Equipment for use as Fire department 12/28/2017 inspector vehicles, and that City is relying on the warranties of the Vendor that the Equipment is fit for this purpose and the ordinary purposes for which the Equipment is normally used. c. Full Disclosure. None of the representations and warranties made by Vendor in this Agreement contains or will contain any untrue statements of a material fact, or omits to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading. 5. TIME OF DELIVERY The date and time of delivery of the Equipment shall be on or before within 30-60 days of receipt of purchase order. 6. PLACE OF DELIVERY The Equipment shall be delivered to the following location City of Temecula Fire Department 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 TITLE AND RISK OF LOSS Title to and the risk of loss, damage and destruction of the Equipment shall remain with the Vendor until after inspection and acceptance of the Equipment by City. 7. INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE City shall inspect the Equipment at the time and place of delivery. Such inspection may include reasonable tests and use of the Equipment by City. If, in the determination of City, the Equipment fails to conform to the Agreement IN ANY MANNER OR RESPECT, City shall so notify Vendor within ten (10) days of delivery of the Equipment to City. Failing such notice, the Equipment shall be deemed accepted by City as of the date of receipt. 8. REJECTION In the event of such notice of non -conformity by City pursuant to the section entitled "Acceptance" above, City may, at its option, (1) reject the whole of the Equipment, (2) accept the whole of the Equipment, or (3) accept any commercial unit or units of the Equipment and reject the remainder. The exercise of any of the above options shall be "without prejudice" and with full reservation of any rights and remedies of City attendant upon a breach. In the event of such notice and election by City, City agrees to comply with all reasonable instructions of Vendor and, in the event that expenses are incurred by City in following such instructions, Vendor shall indemnify City in full for such expenses. 9. NO REPLACEMENTS OF CURE This Agreement calls for strict compliance. Vendor expressly agrees that both the Software tendered and the tender itself will conform fully to the terms and conditions of the Agreement on the original tender. In the event of rejection by City of the whole of the Software or any part thereof pursuant to the section entitled "Rejection" above, City may, but is not required 2 12/28/2017 to, accept any substitute performance from Vendor or engage in subsequent efforts to affect a cure of the original tender by Vendor. 10. MAINTENANCE Vendor shall maintain the Equipment in accordance with the terms of the maintenance schedule attached hereto as Exhibit B, and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full. In performing the maintenance of the Equipment, Vendor shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing similar services as are required of Vendor hereunder in meeting its maintenance obligations under this Agreement. 11. INDEMNIFICATION Vendor agrees to defend, indemnify, protect, and hold harmless, the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, and its officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers, from and against any and all claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, actions, liability or damages of any kind and nature which the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, its officers, agents, employees, and volunteers may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of Vendor's negligent or wrongful acts or omissions arising out of or in any way related to the Work or the Vendor's performance or non-performance of this Agreement, excepting only liability out of the sole negligence of the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency. 12. AGREEMENT DOCUMENTS a. This Agreement includes the following documents, which are by this reference incorporated herein and made a part hereof: • Description of Equipment / Scope of Work (from the Request for Proposal (RFP), attached hereto as Exhibit A • Response/Quotation to the Request for Proposal (RFP), attached hereto as Exhibit B b. In the event any term or condition of the Agreement Documents conflicts with or is contradictory to any term or condition of the Agreement, the terms and conditions of this Agreement are controlling. c. In the event of a conflict in terms between this Agreement, the Request for Proposal (RFP) and/or the Vendor's response to the RFP, this Agreement shall prevail over the RFP and the Vendor's response to the RFP. 13. REMEDIES The remedies and rights conferred on the City by this Agreement are in addition to and cumulative with all other remedies and rights accorded the City under law or equity. 14. SURVIVAL OF RERESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES 3 12/28/2017 All representations, warranties, covenants and agreements of the parties contained in this Agreement shall survive the execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement. 15. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES The Vendor shall keep itself informed of State and Federal laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Vendor shall at all times observe and comply with all such laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Vendor to comply with this section. 16. ASSIGNMENT The Vendor shall not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of the City. This Agreement shall be binding on, and shall inure to the benefit of, the parties to it and their respective heirs, legal representatives, successors and assigns. Upon termination of the Agreement, Vendor's sole compensation shall be payment for actual equipment received. 17. SEVERABILITY If any provision of this Agreement is held invalid or unenforceable by any court of final jurisdiction, it is the intent of the parties that all other provisions of this Agreement be construed to remain fully valid, enforceable, and binding on the parties. 18. PROHIBITED INTEREST No officer, or employee of the City of Temecula that has participated in the development of this agreement or its approval shall have any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement, the proceeds thereof, the Vendor, or Vendor's sub -Contractors for this project, during his/her tenure or for one year thereafter. The Vendor hereby warrants and represents to the City that no officer or employee of the City of Temecula that has participated in the development of this agreement or its approval has any interest, whether contractual, non -contractual, financial or otherwise, in this transaction, the proceeds thereof or in the business of the Vendor or Vendor's sub -Contractors on this project. Vendor further agrees to notify the City in the event any such interest is discovered whether or not such interest is prohibited by law or this Agreement. 19. ENTIRE AGREEMENT; MODIFICATION; WAIVER This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties pertaining to the subject matter hereof and thereof and supersedes all prior and contemporaneous agreements, representations and understandings of the parties, whether oral or written. No supplement, modification or amendment of this Agreement or the Agreement Documents shall be binding unless executed in writing by all the parties. No waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement or the Agreement Documents shall be deemed, or shall constitute, a waiver of any other provision, whether or not similar, nor shall any waiver constitute a continuing waiver. No waiver shall be binding unless executed in writing by the party making the waiver. 4 12/28/2017 20. NOTICES Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (i) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice. Notice shall be effective upon delivery to the addresses specified below or on the third business day following deposit with the document delivery service or United States Mail as provided above. Mailing Address: City of Temecula Attn: City Manager 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 To Consultant: Raceway Ford Inc. Attn: Mike Ladner 5900 Sycamore Canyon Blvd Riverside, CA 92507 21. EFFECTS OF HEADINGS The subject headings of the sections and subsections of this Agreement are included for convenience only and shall not affect or be considered in the construction or interpretation of any of its provisions. 22. GOVERNING LAW This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with, and governed by, the laws of the State of California as applied to contracts that are executed and performed entirely in California. The City and Vendor understand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties, and liabilities of the parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation concerning this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event such litigation is filed by one party against the other to enforce its rights under this Agreement, the prevailing party, as determined by the court's judgment, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney fees and litigation expenses for the relief granted. 23. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of the Vendor warrants and represents that he or she has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Vendor and has the authority to bind the Vendor to the performance of its obligation hereunder. The City Manager is authorized to enter into an amendment on behalf of the City to make the following non -substantive modifications to the agreement: (a) name changes; (b) extension of time; (c) non -monetary changes in scope of work; (d) agreement termination. 5 12/28/2017 This page was intentionally left blank. 6 12/28/2017 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF TEMECULA By: Matt Rahn, Mayor ATTEST: Raceway Ford, Inc. (Two Signatures of corporate officers required unless corporate documents authorize only one person to sign the agreement on behalf of the corporation.) By: By: By: Randi Johl, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney VENDOR William Chamberlin, Vice President Mike L Raceway Ford, Inc Ieet Manager Mike Ladner 5900 Sycamore Canyon Blvd. Riverside, CA 92507 951-317-2101 mladner@earthlink.net 7 PM Initials Date: 12/28/2017 EXHIBIT A DESCRIPTION OF EQUIPMENT NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION SPECIFICATION INCLUDED (YES/NO) 1. Wheelbase 105.9" 2. Engine • 2.5L Duratec 1-4 Engine 3. Transmission • 6 Speed Select Shift Automatic 4. Steering • Electric Power Assisted Steering 5. Brakes • Power Disc Brakes with ABS 6. Seats • Front bucket seats, rear 60/40 split -fold seats with tip-fold=flat latch cloth 7. Cooling • Factory Standard 8. Battery • Factory Standard 9. Alternator • Factory Standard 10. Color • Exterior— Oxford White • Interior — Charcoal Black Cloth 11 Mirrors • Power Side View mirrors with integrated blind spot mirror and manual fold -way design 12. Suspension • 4 -Wheel independent suspension 13. Warranty • Bumper warranty to include routine maintenance 14. Factory Items • Radio AM/FM CD Player rear view camera • Gauges - Factory Standard • Fuel Tank — 15.1 Gal • Air Condition — Factory Standard • Wheels and Tires — 17" steel wheels with silver wheel covers, P235/55R17 All - Season BSW tires • Rear bumpers — Painted body color 8 12/28/2017 NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION SPECIFICATION INCLUDED (YES/NO) • Transfer case — 4X4 Escape S 16. Special Items • Dealer shall provide all DMV services for permanent registration and supply exempt license plates. • Dealer shall provide four (4) sets of keys for four key fobs • Setina partion that secures cargo area behind the rear seats crossovers, 1-piece vinyl coated 11-guage expanded metal window, 1 1/2 " X 2" extruded aluminum window framework, 14 gauge steel seat back protector panel, rugged zinc-free powder coat finish 17. Options Required • Front and rear stabilizer bar • Torque vectoring control • Adjustable driver and front passenger sun visor • Cargo floor hooks • Two coat hooks • Four cupholders • Front and rear dome lights with map lights and rear cargo lights • Front-row center console with arm rest • Illuminated entry system • Message center • Overhead console with sunglass holder • Power door locks • Power windows • Rear seat in floor storage compartment • Seat side storage trays for driver and passenger • Steering wheel mounted cruise control and audio controls • Tachometer • Three 12 volt power points • Tilt/Telescoping steering column • Rear window defroster • Solar tinted glass • Windshield wipers-front: variable intermittent with washer and rear 2 speaed with washer • Tire pressure monitoring system • Securilock passive anti-theft system • Dual air bags and side curtain air bags Delivery Point: Piece quoted shall include all delivery and unloading charges to the purchaser. Dealer Service: The equipment furnished under this contract shall be completely services by the vendor prior to delivery. It shall be ready for operation when delivered. Any further servicing by the vendor will not be required except in connection with repairs or adjustments covered by the manufacturer or dealer's warranty. Equipment Condition: The vehicle furnished shall be new and unused, current model with standard factory fittings, trim and accessories unless otherwise noted. 9 12/28/2017 EXHIBIT B PAYMENT RATES AND SCHEDULE The Purchase Price which City agrees to pay to Vendor for the Equipment is One Hundred and three thousand, seven hundred and sixteen Dollars and zero cents ($103,716.00) per vendor proposal attached hereto and incorporated herein as those set forth in full. The Purchase Price is final and shall be paid by City to Vendor within thirty (30) days upon receipt of non -disputed invoice. 10 12/28/2017 VENDOR: ADDRESS: EXHIBIT B Con't Ford 4X4 Escape fleet vehicles RACEWAY FORD 5900 Sycamore Canyon Blvd Riverside, CA 92507 PHONE/FAX: (CI . r\) 2iiLt-"(5S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE: LM \\ (no 1c,r SIG RE: FORD 4X4 ESCAPE MAKE: rO COLOR: 1A -Na VEHICLE PRICE: EOUIPMENT PRICE: SALES TAX: f : TOTAL PRICE: MODEL: CV No- -Lick YEAR: ZZo.e. -2-3111-C. 2l.L 2 (o, I s -I. c. C.c COSTS STATED WITHIN THE UNIT SALES PRICE ARE ALL-INCLUSIVE FOR SPECIFICATIONS LISTED. SIGNING THIS PROPOSAL GUARANTEES DELIVERY WITHIN 245 DAYS OF RECEIPT OF PURCHASE ORDER. Prepared By: Administrator Your Dealership Name Here 2018 Ford Escape • VEHICLE REPORT SELECTED MODEL Code Description 2018 Ford Escape U9G 4dr 4x4 SE Invoice Dir Price U9G 2018 Ford Escape 4dr 4x4 SE SELECTED VEHICLE COLORS Code Description Interior. CHARCOAL BLACK Exterior 1: OXFORD WHITE Exterior 2: No color has been selected. SELECTED OPTIONS Code Description Class $25, 743.00 $24,934.00 rrepared by: Invoice Dir Price PACKAGES 200A Equipment Group 200A (99D) Engine: 1.5L EcoBoost : Includes auto start -stop technology.; (446) Transmission; 6 -Speed Automatic w/SelectShift; (STDAX) 3.51 Axle Ratio; (STDGV) GVWR: 4,760 (STDTR) Tires: P235/55R17 A/S BSW : Low -Rolling -Resistance. Includes mint spare.; (64N) Wheels: 17' Sparkle Silver -Painted Aluminum: (K) Heated Unique Cloth Front Bucket Seats : Includes 10 -way power driver seat (includes power lumbar and power recline) and 4 -way manual front passenger (fore/aft with manual recline).; (STDRD) Radio: AM/FM Stereo w/Single-CD/MP3 Player: includes 6 speakers, speed compensated volume end SiriusXM radio with a 6 month prepaid subscription. Note: SiriusXM audio and data services each require a subscription sold separately, or as a package, by Sirius XM Radio Inc. If you decide to continue service after your trial, the subscription plan you choose will automatically renew d ychargedu will be acto cour chosen ording pamentt methafter and od at then -current rates. Fees and taxes apply To cancel you must call SiriusXM at 1-866-635-2349. See SiriusXM Customer Agreement for complete terms at wwwsirlusxm.com. All fees and programming subject to change. Sirius, XM and all related marks and logos are trademarks of Sinus XM Radio Inc. OPT 80.00 $0.00 Report content Is based on current data version referenced. My partormance-related ca c1 189ons are offered solely as guidelines Actual unit performance will depend on your operating conditions PC Carbock$t, Data Version: 5.0, Date Updated 0X17/2014 09 1322 PM CCopyright 1988-2012 Chrome Data Solutions, LP All rights reserved Odobar 05.2017 Page 2 . lbs, CSW illi rues f'23:03br. l ; i !', t1;,, I ow RnIlilln l:r'ci.4tnlire torlu'lr•S mint SpFIr'n ili4N1 Wlt: - Prepared By: Administrator Your Dealership Name Here 2018 Ford Escape • VEHICLE REPORT SELECTED OPTIONS Code Description Class 201e Ford Escape U8G 4dr 4x4 SE Invoice Dir Price EMISSIONS 425 50 -State Emissions System STD $0.0?repareCRy POWERTRAIN 99D Engine: 1.5L EcoBoost INC $0.00 $0.00 Includes auto start -stop technology. 446 Transmission: 6 -Speed Automaticw/SelectShilt INC $0.00 $0.00 STDAX 3.51 Axle Ratio INC $0.00 $0.00 STDGV GVWR:4,760lbs INC $0.00 $0.00 WHEELS & TIRES STDTR Tires: P235y55R17 A/S BSW INC $0.00 $0.00 Low -Rolling -Resistance. Includes mini spare. 64N Wheels: 17" Sparkle Silver -Painted Aluminum INC $0.00 $0.00 SEATS & SEAT TRIM K Heated Unique Cloth Front Bucket Seats INC $0.00 $0.00 Includes 10 -way power driver seat (Includes power lumbar and 425 powerregllne) and.4wlay manual front passenger (fore/aft with io 00 $0 00 manual recline). OTHER OPTIONS PAINT Monotone Paint Application STD $0.00 $0.00 106WB 106" Wheelbase STD $0.00 $0.00 STDRD Radio: AM/FM Stereo w/Single-CD/MP3 Player INC $0.00 $0.00 SYNC Communications & Entertainment System : Includes enhanced voice recognition communication , 911 Assist, 4.2" LCD screen in center stack, AppLink and 1 smart charging USB port. Includes 6 speakers, speed compensated volume and SiriusXM radio with a 6 month prepaid subscription. Note: SiriusXM audio and data services each require a subscription sold separately, or as a package, by Sirius XM Radio Inc. If you decide to continue service after your trial, the subscription plan you choose will automatically renew thereafter and you will be charged according to your chosen payment method at then -current rates. Fees and taxes apply. To cancel you must Report content is based on current dela version referenced, Ary performance -related calculations are offered solely as guidelines Actual unit perlormanco will depend on your operating conditions. PC CarbooldID, Data Version: 50, Data updated 0711712014 0913:22 PM 5Copyrighl 1986-2012 Chrome Data Solutio ro, LP All rights reserved October 05, 2017 Page 3 putvui lOCerli:) kr11I1 4 wily 1lhirlrr, 11 burl i n1:11rrrnl rer:bre Prepared By: Administ Your Dealership Name Here 2018 Ford Escape • VEHICLE REPORT SELECTED OPTIONS Code Dtscrlptlon Class 20111 Font Escape U90 Ott 4x4 ae Involct DS' Price OTHER OPTIONS (Continued) cal! SiriusXM at 1-866-635-2349. See SiriusXM Customer Agreement for complete terms at www.siriusxm.com. All fees and programming subject to change. Sirius, XM and all related marks and logos are trademarks of Sirius XM Radio Inc. SiriusXM service is not available in Alaska and Hawaii, 153 Front Llcense Plate Bracket Standard In states requiring two license plates and optional to all others. INTERIOR COLORS FOR : PRIMARY WISE r43 Charcoal Black EXTERIOR COLORS FOR RIMARY W!S� Oxford White OPTIONS TOTAL KB OTHER OPTIONS (Contuluud) AaU SirigwYM :11 f 866.61t3 qty. M r',r::l irnry Oa LIa141• ...V._411:s , UIt t'1♦,„Wirt r Charcoal f31acl. OPT Pr£'n red Ryr• $0.00 OPT 50.00 OPT $000 ;0.00 OPT 80 00 :0.00 S0.00 50.00 50.00 Report content is basad on current data vors on retorenced My performance -totaled calc l Ions are offered solely as gurdelnus Actual un l perltxntanco wit depend on your opureUng condsbons PC Ca/boot, Delo Version 5.0, Data updated 07/17/2014 0913 22 PM CCopynghl 1986-2012 Chro•no Data Soblons, LP An /91115 rosorvod October 06,2017 Page 4 Prepared By: Administrator Your Dealership Name Here 2018 Ford Escape • VEHICLE REPORT PRICING SUMM/\P?Y Price Component 2010 Ford Escape UOG Adr Ax4 SE Invoice Dir Price Base Price $25,743.00 $24,934.00 Total Options $0.00 A .1 G $0.00 / . Adinitlistrator Vehicle Subtotal $25,743.00 $24,934.00 Advert/Adjustments $0.00 $0.00 Destination Charge 3995.00 $995.00 TOTAL VEHICLE PRICE 328,738.00 $25,929.00 Customer Signature /Date Dealer Signature/ Date Report content a based on currant dale uerswn referenced My pertormanco-relalnd calculators are offered solely as gude!inos. Actual unA performance w01 depend on your operating condkoM PC Celbod,e. Oats Vorswn 50. Data updated 07117/2014 09:1322 PAA ¢;Copyrgnl 1996.2012 Chrome Data Solutions, LP M rghis racarvud. Odobsr 05, 2017 Page 1 Prepared By: Administrator Your Dealership Name Here 2018 Ford Escape • VEHICLE REPORT STANDARD EQUIPMENT Powertrain 2018 Ford Escape USG 4dr 4x4 8E • EcoBoost 179hp 1.5L DOHC 16 valve intercooled turbo 1-4 engine with variable valve control, gasoline direct injection • Recommended fuel: regular unleaded • Emissions type: ULEV 11 • 6 speed automatic transmission with overdrive, SelectShift sequential sport shift • Automatic full-time 4 wheel drive • Torque Vectoring Control brake actuated limited slip differential L• Fuel Economy City: 22mpg -_ Yuta !Mrd • -cape • Fuel Economy Highway: 28mpg • Fuel Tank Capacity:: 15.7gai. Suspension/Handling • Front Independent strut suspension with anti -roll bar, gas -pressurized shocks • Reenindependenhshort pncilong arm.suspension with anti -roll bar, gas-prossudzed shocks • Speed -sensing electric power -assist rack -pinion steering • Front and rear 17" x 7.5" silver aluminum wheels • P235y55HR17.0 BSA,AS front and rear tires Body Exterior F,ticr unOmv City.. 22rnp l • Driver and passenger power remote door mirrors • Body -colored door mirrors • Rear lip spoiler Report ccntent is based on currant data versan roloroncod My performance -related calculations aro offered solely as gurd 1.nes Actoai arta perrormanco will depend on your operaling wnd Dons. PC Carl>oolam, Dab Version 6.0. Date updated 07117!2014 05:13:22 PMC' Copyright 19862012 Chrome Data Solutions, LP All rights reserved. Odobor05,2417 • twin eun.lr,,r,n rrf ,d„d. .0 r.: .ra+,r,an. Page Prepared By: Administrator Your Dealership Name Here 2018 Ford Escape • VEHICLE REPORT STANDARD EQUIPMENT Body Exterior (Continued) • Body -colored bumpers • Roof rack rails only • Clearcoat paint Convenience 2015 Ford Escape USG 4dr 4x4 SE •••• .n,r rte,,. • Dual zone front automatic air conditioning with eir filter • Cruise control with steering wheel controls • Power windows • Driver 1 -touch down • Driver 1 -touch up • Remote power door locks with 2 stage unlock and illuminated entry • Manual tilt steering wheel • Manuaktelescopio,steering wheel • Day -night rearview mirror • Internet access • 911 Assist emergency communication system • Wireless phone connectivity CCD •Monitor • Front and rear cupholders • Dual visor vanity mirrors • Full floor console io ruru Lst,diu Report content o basad on current data verson referenced My portormenceielatod carc Iotlora are offered soot' as guidehnee Actual arta potlormonce wilt depend on yotr operating conddrone. PC Corbooke. Data Version 5.0 Dale updalod 07/1712014 0917 22 PM GCopyr ght 1986.20 t2 Chrome Dela Solehons, LP AN rights resorted. October 05, 2017 Page 8 Prepared By: Administrator Your Dealership Name Here 2018 Fotd'E'scape • VEHICLE REPORT STANDARD EQUIPMENT Convenience (Continued) 2016 Ford Escape U90 4dr 4x4 SE • Covered floor storage • Driver and passenger door bins • Rear door bins Seats and Trim • Seating capacity of 5 • Front bucket seats • 8 -way (8 -way power) driver seat adjustment • Power 2 -way driver lumbar support • Power height adjustable driver seat • 4 -way passenger seat adjustment • Center front armrest • Heated:fontseats:10r • 60-40 folding mar split -bench seat • Cloth seat upholstery • Metal -look instrument panel insert • Metal -look console insert Metal-liokeearStilt( Ad(' :;c,rt '1"w • Carpet front and rear floor mats Entertainment Features 2018 Ford Escape • SiriusXMAM/FM/Satellite radio with radio data system Report content is based on current data vors.on referenced Any performance -related celculatone are offered solely as guidol nos Actual unit performance will depend on your operating conditions. PC Corbookelk Oslo Version. 5.0, Date updated 07/17/2014 09 13 22 PM ✓,'.Copyr, ghl 1906.2012 Chrome Data Solutions. LP Alt notes reserved. • I tr:afutl hunt , ' ,1 October 05, 2017 Page 7 Prepared By: Administrator Your Dealership Name Here Ford Escape VEHICLE REPORT STANDARD EQUIPMENT Entertainment Features (Continued) 2018 Ford Escape USG 4dr 4o4 8E • Single CD player • MP3 decoder • SYNC external memory control • Steering wheel mounted radio controls • 6 speakers • Integrated roof antenna Lighting, Visibility and Instrumentation 2018 Ford Escape • Halogen aero -composite headlights • Delay -off headlights • Fully automatic headlights • Front fog lights • Variable intermittent front windshield wipers • Fixed interval rear windshield wiper • Rear window defroster • Fixed rearmost windows • Deep tinted windows F. Ot1ading lightg ; •. • Tachometer • Compass • Outside temperature display Report content is based on current data version referenced. Any performance -related cakWolam ore offered solely es gurdelmes Actual unit performance .vill depend on your operating conditions PC Carbootc2i. Data, Version. 5.0. Data updated 07/172014 09:13:22 PM 49Copyrlght 1988-2012 Clxomo Delo Solutions, LP At rights reserved. • October05, 2017 orifi 1 P rnb•rmdtonl rani r:, r�tr,,/nr!rrl tra� _ Pege 8 Prepared By: Administrator Your Dealership Name Here 2018 Ford Escape • VEHICLE REPORT STANDARD EQUIPMENT Lighting, Visibility and Instrumentation (Continued) 2018 Ford Escape 1190 4dr 4x4 8E • Low tire pressure warning • Trip computer • Trip odometer • Rear camera Safety and Security • 4 -wheel ABS brakes • Brake assist • 4 -wheel disc brakes • AdvanceTrac w/Roll Stability Control electronic stability • ABS and driveline traction control • Dual front impact airbag supplement& restraint system • Dual seat mounted side impact airbag supplemental restraint system • Safety Canopy System curtain 1st and 2nd row overhead airbag supplemental restraint system • Knee airbag supplemental restraint system • Airbag supplemental restraint system occupancy sensor • Power remote door locks with 2 stage unlock and panic alarm g'eunty system with Securllock immobilizer • Manually adjustable front head restraints with lilt • 3 manually adjustable mar head restraints Specs and Dimensions 2018 Ford Escape Raped content os based on currord data version referenced. Any performance -related calculations aro offered solely as ouidetlnes Actual umt pedormanco will depend on your operating conditions PC Ca:book8l, Dale Version 5.0, Data updated 07117/2014 09.13 22 PM OCo, ynghl 1986.2012 Chrome Data Solutions, LP. All rights reserved, October 05, 2017 l,rn.rr ,.r:, 'r' - Page9 • VEHICLE REPORT STANDARD EQUIPMENT Specs and Dimensions (Continued) • Engine displacement: 1.51. • Engine horsepower: 179hp @ 6,000RPM • Engine torque: 177 lb. -ft. @ 2,500RPM • Bore x stroke 3.11"x 3.20" • Compression ratio: 9.99:1 • Gear ratios (1st): 4.58 Gear ratios (2nd): 2.96 Gear ratios (3rd): 1.91 Gear ratios (4th): 1.44 Gear ratios (51h): 1.00 • Gear ratios (8th): 0.74 • Gear ratios (reverse): 2.94 Curb weight: 3, 6451bs. • GVWR. 4,7801bs. • Towing capacity: 2, 000Ibs. • Exterior length: 178.1" • Exterior body width: 72.4" • Exterior height: 66.3" • Wheelbase: 105.9" Prepared Sy: Administrator Your Dealership Name Here 2018 Ford Escape 2018 Ford Escape U90 4dr 484 88 2018 Fa(d Escape Report content is basad on current dela version referenced. My performance4aisled calculations are offered solely as guidelines, Actual unit performance will depend on your operating oofdelana. PC Cerbooka Dale Moreton 6.0, Data updated 07/172014 09:13.22 PM CCopyrigth 1988.2012 Chrome Date Solutions, LP. M nghta reserved. Page 10 October 05,2017 Prepared By: Administrator Your Dealership Name Here 2018 Ford Escape • VEHICLE REPORT STANDARD EQUIPMENT Specs and Dimensions (Continued) 2018 Ford Escape U90 4d r 4x4 SE • Front track: 61.5" • Rear track: 61.6" • Turning radius: 19.4' • Min ground clearance: 7.9" • Front legroom: 43.1" • Rear legroom: 36.8" • Front headroom: 39.9" • Rear headroom: 39.0" • Front hiproom: 54.8" • Rear hiproom:: 52.4" • Front shoulder room: 56.0" • Rear shoulder room: 55.3" • Passenger volume: 98.1 cult. • Approach angle: 21.9 deg • Departure angle: 27.6 deg • Interior cargo volume: 34.3cu.it. • Interior cargo volume seats folded: 67.8cu.ft. • Interior maximum cargo volume: 67.8cu.ft. 71118 Ford Escape Report content is based on current data version referenced. Any performance -related calculations are offered solely as euidolmos. Actual unit performance wilt depend on your operating cant/Mlont. PC Carbook, Date Version 5.0, On1a updated 07/172014 09:1322 PM OCopytlghl 1986.2012 Chrome Dela Solutions, LP. A0 nettle reserved October 05, 2017 Page 11 Prepared By: Administrator Your Dealership Name Here 2018 Ford Escape • VEHICLE REPORT WARRANTY INFORMATION INARRAICY Basic: 36 month/36, 000 miles Powenrein: 60 month/60, 000 miles Corrosion Perforation: 60 month/unlimited mileage Roadside Assistance: 60 month/80,000 miles WARRANTY 2014 Ford Escape 1190 4dr 4x4 BE Repel content s based on curtonl data version referenced Any portormnnce-reletod catcutetions ere offered solely as guidelines Actual umt performance wilt depend on your o;,erulv.p conditio .. PC Corbook•, Dais Version: 5.0. Data updaod 07/17/2014 09 13-22 PM CCopyright 1908.2012 Chrome Data Solutions. LP All rights reserved October 06, 2017 Page 12 Prepared By: Administrator Your Dealership Name Here 2018 Ford Escape • VEHICLE REPORT POWERTRAIN - BASIC SPFCIFICATIONS Engine, 2011 Ford Escape U90 4dr 4x4 SE Engine Order Code Engine type Displacement SAE Net Horsepower @ RPM SAE Net Torque (lb ft) @ RPM Transmission 99D regular unleaded 1-4 1.5091 CID 179 @ 8,000 177 @ 2,500 Transmission order code 448 Transmission Type Description 8 -speed automatic Drive Train four-wheel drive Mileage City EPA Fuel Economy Estimate (MPG) 22.00 HWTEPA`FueTECOnamyEstlmate (MPG) — --- -28.00 ono City cruising range (ml) 345.00 Hwy cruising range (mi) 439.00 • Indicates equipment which Is in addition to or replaces base model's standard equipment. rwy LPA Fuel kconolny LS11111 luC t(vi!'U) Report Content Is based on current data version referenced. My perfamence-related calculations are offered solely as guidelines. Actual unll performance will depend as your operating conditions. PC CarbookA, Data Version: 5.0. Date updated 07/172014 08:13:22 PM CCopyriptil 180E-2012 Chrome Dela Solu8on4 LP. All dghs reserved. ' • nn October 05, 2017 Page 13 • VEHICLE REPORT POWERTRAIN - ADVANCFD SPECIFICATIONE Transmission Gear Ratio (.1) First Gear Ratio (:1) Second Gear Ratio (:1) Third Gear Ratio (:1) Fourth Gear Ratio (:1) Fifth Gear Ratio (:1) Sixth Geer Ratio (:1) Reverse Ratio (:1) Differential Prepared By: Administrator Your Dealership Name Here 2018 Ford Escape 4.58 2.96 1,91 1.44 1.00 0.74 2.94 Front 2018 Ford Escape Uel3 4dr 4x4 SE Rear • --Axle Ratio (:1) 3.51 " Indicates equipment which is in addition to or replaces base model's standard equipment. Reporl collard Is based on arrant Bete version rdarsnried. Any performanco•ralWod calculations are offered solely es gualelnos Actual un 1 performance will depend on your operating conditions PC Carhook4D, Dela Version 5.0, Data updated 07117#2014 09 1322 PM °Copyright 1996.20+2 Chrome Data Solrtions, LP All rights reserved. October 05, 2017 Page 14 • VEHICLE REPORT PAYLOADITRAILERING SPECIFICATIONS Weight Information Front Prepared By: Administrator Your Dealership Name Here 2018 Ford Escape 2010 Ford Escape 1190 4dr 4s4 BE Rear TOTAL Curb Weight (lbs.) 3,645 As Spec'd Curb Weight (lbs.) 3,645 Gross Vehicle Wt Rating (lbs.) Trallering Max Trailer Wt. Max Tongue Load 4,760 Dead Weight Hitch (lbs.) 2,000 Weight Distributing Hitch (lbs.) 2,000 ` Indicates equipment which is in addition to or replaces base model's standard equipment. �,'OdU 'Vb: Iu 1 uicu (lbs Report content is bated on current dale version referenced Any performanoe•roleted calculations are offered solely ea guideMes. Actual unit performance wil depend on your operating conddrons PC Carbook .). Dale Version. 5,0, Dnlo updalcd 07117/2014 09 13 72 PM s?Copynehl 10911.2012 Clrorne Data Solubocs. IP Alt rtghte reserved. 0dcber 05, 2017 Pape 10 Prepared By: Administrator Your Dealership Name Here 2018 Ford Escape • VEHICLE REPORT CHASSIS SP[CIFICATIONS Suspension 2018 Ford Escape 090 4dr Mt SE Front Rear Spring Spring Type Axle Axle Type Brakes coil coil Independent independent ABS System 4 -wheel Front Rear Disc Rotor Diam Tkes yes yes 12.750 12.000 Front Rear Spare Tire Order Code STOTR STDTR Tire Size P235/55R17.0 P235/55R17.0 Wheels Front Rear Spare Wheel Size 17 x 7.5 17 x 7.5 Wheel Type aluminum aluminum Steering Steering Type : electric power -assist Turning Radius Curb -to -Curt, 19.4 Fuel Tank Main Auxiliary Capacity (gal.) 15,7 • Indicates equipment which is In addition to or replaces base model's standard equipment. Iire Size r • . u Repel content is based on current dela version referenced My performance -related calculellons are offered solely as guidelines. Actual unit performance w81 depend on your °pending conditions. PC Crbook®, Dau Version: 5.0. Data updated 07/17/2014 09:1322 PM °Copyright 1986-2012 Chrome Data Solutions, LP. AY rights reserved, October 05, 2017 Pegs 16 Prepared By: Administrator Your Dealership Name Here 2018 Ford Escape • VEHICLE REPORT D1MLNS10NS Extsrlor,DIm.nslons 2018 Ford Escape U00 4dr 4x4 88 Wheelbase () 105.90 Length, Overall w/o rear bumper (") 178.10 Width, Max w/o mirrors () 72.40 Height, Overall () 66.30 Ground Clearance Minimum Ground Clearance () 7.90 Interior Dimensions Passenger Capacity 5 Seating Position Front Second Head Room (in) 39.90 39.00 Leg Room (") 43.10 36.80 Shoulder Room () 56.00 55.30 Hip Room () 54.80 52.40 • Indicates equipment which is in addition to or replaces base model's standard equipment. • Groins `Cloarnnce' Rigid Content le emM MxtwraWed d Roon (in) My �pmenc crewed otladWbns are offered sole g 1'1 J�J panel (Nle conditions. PC Cubed.. Dela dVerebrrel 0, Dale updated 07/17!2014 0913:22 PM OCopyrgh11086.2012 Chrome Dole Solutions. sL LP. All rights reserved will de YOu► October 05, 2017 Pape 17 Item No. 6 Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Charlie DeHart, Division Chief DATE: March 27, 2018 SUBJECT: Approve the Second Amendment to the Agreement with Proactive Fire Design and Consulting, Inc. for Fire Department Plan Review Service PREPARED BY: Wendy Miller, Administrative Assistant RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the Second Amendment to the Agreement with Proactive Fire Design and Consulting, Inc., in the amount of $15,000, for Fiscal Year 2017-18 for Fire Department Plan Review Service. BACKGROUND: On July 1, 2015, the City and Consultant entered into that certain Agreement entitled "Agreement for Fire Department Plan Review Service," in the amount of Ninety Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($90,000) annually with the ability, upon mutual agreement to extend the contract for four (4) additional one (1) year terms for a total five year agreement amount of $450,000. On July 1, 2016 the City and Consultant entered into the first amendment to that certain agreement entitled "Agreement for Fire Department Plan Review Services" to extend the term to June 30, 2020. The parties now desire to increase the payment in the amount of $15,000.00 for a total contract amount of $465,000.00. FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate funds are available with the approval of the mid -year Fire Department budget approved by the Council on February 27, 2018. ATTACHMENTS: Amendment SECOND AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF TEMECULA AND PROACTIVE FIRE DESIGN & CONSULTING, INC. FIRE DEPARTMENT PLAN REVIEW SERVICE THIS SECOND AMENDMENT is made and entered into as of March 27, 2018 by and between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and Proactive Fire Design & Consulting, Inc., a Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Consultant"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. This Amendment is made with the respect to the following facts and purposes: a. On July 1, 2015, the City and Consultant entered into that certain Agreement entitled "Agreement for Fire Department Plan Review Service," in the amount of Ninety Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($90,000) annually with the ability, upon mutual agreement to extend the contract for four (4) additional one (1) year terms for a total five year agreement amount of $450,000. b. On July 1, 2016 the City and Consultant entered into the first amendment to that certain agreement entitled "Agreement for Fire Department Plan Review Services" to extend the term to June 30, 2020. c. The parties now desire to increase the payment in the amount of $15,000.00 for a total contract amount of $465,000.00. 2. Section (4) entitled "PAYMENT" is hereby amended to read as follows: The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, in accordance with the payment rates and terms and the schedule of payment as set forth in Exhibit B, Payment Rates and Schedule, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. Any terms in Exhibit B, other than the payment rates and schedule of payment, are null and void. The SECOND Amendment amount shall not exceed fifteen thousand dollars and no cents ($ 15,000.00) for additional plan check services for a total Agreement amount of four hundred and sixty five thousand dollars and no cents ($ 465,000.00). 3. Except for the changes specifically set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 12/28/2017 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF TEMECULA PROACTIVE FIRE DESIGN & CONSULTING, INC. (Two Signatures of corporate officers required unless corporate documents authorize only one person to sign the agreement on behalf of the corporation.) By: By: Matt Rahn, Mayor ATTEST: Donald Walton, President By: By: e(414_L__ Randi Johl, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Marie Walton, Secretary Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney CONSULTANT Proactive Fire Design & Consulting, Inc. Donald Walton 43015 Blackdeer Loop, Ste. 205 951-296-3473 don@proactivefiredesign.com 2 PM Initial�:� Date: 12/28/2017 Item No. 7 Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance City Manager 6e. CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Michael Heslin. Director of Information Technology and Support Services DATE: March 27, 2018 SUBJECT: Approve a Purchase and Installation Agreement with Canon Solutions America, Inc. for the Replacement of High Volume Copy Machines PREPARED BY: Damion Patrick, Assistant Director of ITSS RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve a Purchase and Installation Agreement with Canon Solutions America, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $51,968.37, for the replacement of high volume copiers within the Support Services Division of the Information Technology and Support Services Department (ITSS). BACKGROUND: The Support Services Division of ITSS is responsible for providing print, copy, and binding services for all City departments. This may include budget documents, council and commission agendas, flyers, programs, posters, or other high volume items. Three (3) high volume copy machines handle most of the print jobs within the division. These were installed in 2010 and have made over eight million copies combined. At this point, they are well beyond the typical end of life for a copy machine and are due for replacement. This project will replace these machines with new, state-of-the-art copy machines that meet or exceed the specifications of the three (3) existing machines. On November 14, 2017, the City issued a competitive solicitation for the purchase and installation of replacement equipment via the City's online bidding system, PlanetBids. The solicitation did include the Local Vendor Preference Ordinance language as adopted in July 2012, however, no local vendors proposed. After the selection committee reviewed all proposals, Canon Solutions of America, Inc., was the preferred vendor. The approval of this Agreement authorizes the purchase and installation of equipment to replace three (3) high volume copy machines within the Support Services Division of ITSS. FISCAL IMPACT: Outlay Budget. ATTACHMENT: Adequate funds have been budgeted in the 2017-2018 Capital Purchase and Install Agreement PURCHASE AND INSTALLATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND CANON SOLUTIONS AMERICA, INC. PURCHASE AND INSTALLATION OF CANON COPIERS THIS AGREEMENT is made and effective as of March 27, 2018, between the City of Temecula (hereinafter referred to as "City") a municipal corporation, and Canon Solutions America, Inc., a New York corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Contractor"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. TERM This Agreement shall commence on March 27, 2018, and shall remain and continue in effect for a period of one (1) year. The City may, upon mutual agreement of the parties, extend the contract for one (1) additional one (1) year term which extension shall be confirmed by the parties by written amendment to this Agreement, which will in no event terminate later than March 27, 2020. 2. PURCHASE AND SALE OF EQUIPMENT On and subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement, Contractor agrees to sell and install for the City the copiers, printers and related devices described in Exhibit A, Description of Equipment and/or Scope of Work attached hereto(hereafter "Equipment" or "Services"). 3. PURCHASE / INSTALLATION PRICE The Purchase Price which City agrees to pay to Contractor for the Equipment is set forth in Exhibit B, Purchase Price. 4. SCOPE OF WORK Contractor shall install the equipment as described in Exhibit A, Scope of Work ("Work"). Contractor shall provide and furnish all labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable equipment and all utility and transportation services required for the Work as set forth in Exhibit A. All of said Work to be performed and materials to be furnished for the Work shall be in accordance with the specifications set forth in the Scope of Work. Contractor shall not commence the Work until such time as directed in writing by the City (e-mail being acceptable) which notification shall occur no later than March 30, 2018. 5. INTENTIONALLY OMITTED 6. INTENTIONALLY OMITTED 7. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF VENDOR Contractor makes the following representations and warranties to City: a. Authority and Consents. Contractor has the right, power, legal capacity and authority to enter into and perform its obligations under this Agreement. No approvals or consents of any persons are necessary in connection with Contractor's execution, delivery, installation and performance of this Agreement, except for such as have been obtained on or prior to the date hereof. The execution, delivery, installation and performance of this Agreement by Contractor have been duly authorized by all necessary action on the part of Contractor and constitute the legal, valid and binding obligations of Contractor, enforceable against Contractor in accordance with their respective terms. b. Intentionally Omitted. c. Full Disclosure. None of the representations and warranties made by Contractor in this Agreement contains or will contain any untrue statement of a material fact, or omits to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading. 8. PERFORMANCE Contractor shall at all times faithfully, competently and to the best of his or her ability, experience, and talent perform all tasks described herein. Contractor shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing similar services as are required of Contractor hereunder in meeting its obligations under this Agreement. 9. CITY APPROVAL All labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services shall be furnished and work performed and completed subject to the approval of the City or its authorized representatives in accordance with the terms set forth in Exhibit A, Description of Equipment and/or Scope of Work. 10. TIME OF DELIVERY The date and time of delivery of the Equipment shall be on or before March 30, 2018. 11. PLACE OF DELIVERY The Equipment shall be delivered to this location: 41000 Main Street, Temecula, CA 92590. 12. INTENTIONALLY OMITTED 13. INTENTIONALLY OMITTED 14. INTENTIONALLY OMITTED 15. AGREEMENT DOCUMENTS a. This Agreement includes the following Exhibits, which are each by this reference incorporated herein and made a part hereof: 1. Exhibit A. Equipment Description and/or Scope of Work 2. Exhibit B. Purchase Price 3. Exhibit C California WSCA-NASPO Contract Participating Addendum #7- 15-70-23, as held by Canon Solutions America, Inc.'s parent company, Canon U.S.A., Inc., with Canon Solutions America, Inc. acting as authorized dealer for the supply of products and services. 4. Exhibit D. General Provisions, California Information Technology GSPD401 IT dated as of November 27, 2015 as referenced in California WSCA-NASPO Contract Participating Addendum #7-15-70-23. 5. Exhibit E. WSCA-NASPO Contract for the State of Nevada (Master Agreement #3091 for Copiers, Printers and Related Devices) as implemented in California through the Participating Addendum #7-15-70-23.b. b. In the event of any inconsistency between the terms of this Agreement and the agreements described in Exhibits C. through E., the following order of precedence shall apply: 1. This Agreement 2. Exhibit C California WSCA-NASPO Contract Participating Addendum #7- 15-70-23, as held by Canon Solutions America, Inc.'s parent company, Canon U.S.A., Inc.; with Canon Solutions America, Inc. acting as authorized dealer for the supply of products and services. 3. Exhibit D General Provisions, California Information Technology GSPD401IT dated as of November 27, 2013 as referenced in California WSCA-NASPO Contract Participating Addendum #7-15-70-23. 4. Exhibit E WSCA-NASPO Contract for the State of Nevada (Master Agreement #3091 for Copiers, Printers and Related Devices) as implemented in California through the Participating Addendum #7-15-70-23. c. The parties agree that the terms of this Agreement incorporate by reference the terms in the Contractor's WSCA-NASPO Contract for the State of Nevada (Master Agreement #3091 for Copiers, Printers and Related Devices) as implemented in California through the Participating Addendum #7-15-70-23. The California WSCA-NASPO Contract is held by Canon Solutions America, Inc.'s parent company, Canon U.S.A., Inc., with Canon Solutions America, Inc. acting as authorized dealer for the supply of products and services. 16. INTENTIONALLY OMITTED 17. INTENTIONALLY OMITTED 18. INTENTIONALLY OMITTED 19. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES The Contractor shall keep itself informed of all local, State and Federal ordinances, laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Contractor shall at all times observe and comply with all such ordinances, laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity arising from the failure of the Contractor to comply with this section. 20. PROHIBITED INTEREST No officer, or employee of the City of Temecula shall have any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement, the proceeds thereof, the Contractor, or Contractor's sub -contractors for this project, during his/her tenure or for one year thereafter. The Contractor hereby warrants and represents to the City that no officer or employee of the City of Temecula has any interest, whether contractual, non -contractual, financial or otherwise, in this transaction, or in the business of the Contractor or Contractor's sub -contractors on this project. Contractor further agrees to notify the City in the event any such interest is discovered whether or not such interest is prohibited by law or this Agreement. 21. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR a. Contractor is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of Contractor shall at all times be under Contractor's exclusive direction and control. Neither City nor any of its officers, employees, agents, or volunteers shall have control over the conduct of Contractor or any of Contractor's officers, employees, or agents except as set forth in this Agreement. Contractor shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City. Contractor shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against City, or bind City in any manner. b. No employee benefits shall be available to Contractor in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Contractor as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Contractor for performing services hereunder for City. 22. ASSIGNMENT Except as otherwise set forth in this Agreement the Contractor shall not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of the City. 23. NOTICES Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (i) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice. Notice shall be effective upon delivery to the addresses specified below or on the third business day following deposit with the document delivery service or United States Mail as provided above. Mailing Address: To Consultant: 24. GOVERNING LAW City of Temecula Attn: City Manager 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 Attention: City Manager Canon Solutions America, Inc. Attn: Timothy Cooper 3237 E. Guasti Road #200 Ontario, CA 91761 With a copy to: Canon Solutions America, Inc. One Canon Park Melville, New York 11746 Attn: Vice President, Legal The City and Contractor understand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation concerning this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event such litigation is filed by one party against the other to enforce its rights under this Agreement, the prevailing party, as determined by the Court's judgment, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney fees and litigation expenses for the relief granted. 25. ENTIRE AGREEMENT This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior or contemporaneous agreements. understandings, representations and statements, oral or written, are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering into this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party's own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material. 26. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of Contractor warrants and represents that he or she has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Contractor and has the authority to bind Contractor to the performance of its obligations hereunder. The City Manager is authorized to enter into an IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF TEMECULA Matt Rahn, Mayor ATTEST: CANON SOLUTIONS AMERICA, INC. (Two Signatures of corporate ofl'Icers required unless corporate documents authorize only one person to sign the agreement on behalf of the corporation.) By: Name: 1IQuun Rale Tine: S eivo rS ecat-cyc i n By: Randi Johl, JD, MMC, City Clerk Name: Title: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter M. Thorson, City Attomey CONTRACTOR Carton Solutions America, Inc. Timothy Cooper 3237 E. Guasti Road #200 Ontario, CA 91761 (Insert Phone Number] 004 090 — I y$ y (Insert Fax Number] t 0 )340— l 0 [Insert E -Mail] 'f Cooper(` CSO. CAnor1.COYV PM IniUa : ' 1 Date: -�nr�Z1-t EXHIBIT A DESCRIPTION OF EQUIPMENT AND/OR SCOPE OF WORK City is purchasing the following copiers and installation services from Contractor: 1. Color copier, model number Canon iRC 7565i; 2. Black and white copier, model number Canon iR 8505i; and 3. Black and white copier, model number Canon 6565i. EXHIBIT B PURCHASE PRICE Current Copier Model Requested Model (Qty) Options Purchase Price Sales Tax .,(8.75%) Removal Cost of Current Equipment Cost of Data Erase of Current Equipment Total Cost Canon iRC 7065 Canon MC 7565i (1) Saddle Stitich Finisher, Hole Punch Unit, Document Insertion/ Folding Unit $13,804.00 $1,207.85 $0.00 $225.00 $15,236.85 Canon IR 7105 Canon iR 8505i (1) Saddle Stitch Finisher, Hole Punch Unit, Document Insertion/ Folding Unit, Paper deck $26,863.00 $2,350.51 -$700.00 $225.00 $28,738.51 Canon 105+ Canon 6565i (1) Staple Finisher, Hole Punch $7,143.00 5625.01 $0.00 $225.00 $7,993.01 Total: $51,968.37 EXHIBIT C CALIFORNIA WSCA-NASPO CONTRACT PARTICIPATING ADDENDUM #7-15-70-23, AS HELD BY CANON SOLUTIONS AMERICA, INC.'S PARENT COMPANY, CANON U.S.A., INC., WITH CANON SOLUTIONS AMERICA, INC. ACTING AS AUTHORIZED DEALER FOR THE SUPPLY OF PRODUCTS AND SERVICES. [attach copy of agreement here] Exhibit C to Purchase and Installation Agreement Between The City of Temecula and Canon Solutions America, Inc. STATE OF CALIFORNIA PARTICIPATING ADDENDUM NO. 7-15-70-23 Copiers, Printers and Related Devices Nevada NASPO ValuePoint Master Agreement 3091 Canon U.S.A., Inc. This Participating Addendum Number 7-15-70-23 is entered into between the State of California, Department of General Services (hereafter referred to as "State" or "DGS") and Canon USA (hereafter referred to as "Contractor") under the lead State of Nevada NASPO ValuePoint Cooperative Purchasing Organization (NASPO ValuePoint) Master Agreement No. 3091. 1. Scope A. This Participating Addendum covers the purchase of Copiers, Printers and Related Devices under the Nevada NASPO ValuePoint Master Agreement Number 3091. The NASPO ValuePoint Master Agreement is hereby incorporated by reference and shall apply to the purchase of goods and services made under this Participating Addendum. B. This Participating Addendum is available for use by all State Departments and California political subdivisions/local governments. A political subdivision/local government is defined as any city, county, city and county, district, or other local governmental body or corporation, including the California State Universities (CSU) and University of Califomia (UC) systems, K-12 schools and community colleges empowered to expend public funds. C. Each political subdivision/local government is to make its own determination whether this Participating Addendum and the NASPO ValuePoint Master Agreement are consistent with its procurement policies and regulations. 2. Term A. The term of this Participating Addendum shall begin upon signature approval by the State and will end December 31, 2019, or upon termination by the State, whichever occurs first. B. Lead State amendments to extend the Master Agreement term date are not automatically incorporated into this Participating Addendum. Extension(s) to the term of this Participating Addendum will be through a written amendment upon mutual agreement between the State and the Contractor. 3. Mandatory. Statewide Contracts Product and service categories that are available on mandatory Califomia statewide contracts for information technology (IT) copiers, printers and related devices cannot be purchased from this Participating Addendum by State Departments without an exemption. State Departments are responsible for obtaining an exemption from DGS prior to issuing a purchase order. This restriction is not applicable to political subdivisions/local govemments. Page 1 of 9 Participating Addendum No. 7-15-70-23 4. Terms and Conditions Terms and conditions listed below are hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this Participating Addendum as if attached herein and shall apply to the purchase of goods or services made under this Participating Addendum. These include: A. General Provisions — Information Technology, GSPD401 IT, effective 11/27/2013 ("General Conditions"), subject to the modifications set forth in Section 4.B below. The twelve page document can be viewed at: htto://www.documents.dqs.ca.qov/pdhoolioroc/ospd4011T13 1127.0df 1) Terms in the General Conditions stated as being applicable to "Contractor" shall be deemed to be references to each applicable Authorized Dealer under a purchase order to the extent consistent with their responsibilities and activities as contemplated by this Participating Addendum, and reference to "this Contract" shall be deemed to be references to each purchase order. 2) For the purpose of this Participating Addendum, the parties agree to the following modications to the General Provisons: i.With respect to Section 9, "Assignment," consent shall not be required for assignments of rights to payment, provided that Contractor and the applicable Authorized Dealer remain responsible for their obligations this Participating Addendum and the applicable purchase order. ii.With respect to Section 13, "Transporatation Costs and Other Fees or Expenses," if special rigging is required for delivery and installation, the Authorized Dealer may require additional charges therefor but only if approved by the Ordering Agency. iii.With respect to Section 14, "Delivery," Contractor shall make commercially reasonable efforts to meet the specific delivery dates designated in any purchase orders. iv.With respect to Section 18, "Warranty,' the only product warranty terms are those as provided by the respective manufacturer. In the case of Canon or Oce brand manufactured equipment, Canon USA's standard limited warranty statements packaged with the products govern; and provided further that to the extent Contractor offers Software, the warranty coverage for such Software shall be governed by the warranty terms provided by the Software developer of such Software in the applicable end user license agreements included with the Software. v.With respect to Section 22, "Termination for Convenience of the State," such termination is subject to Section 17 of this Participating Addendum. vi.With respect to Section 23.b., "Termination for Default," the parties agree that the cure period in case of breach shall be thirty (30) days. vii.With respect to Section 26, "Limitation of Liability," the exceptions set forth in subsection 26.d.(ii) shall not apply. viii.For the avoidance of doubt, the parties acknowledge and agree that no result of Contractor's services under the Participating Addendum shall be deemed "work for hire" resulting in Work Product. Page 2 of 9 Participating Addendum No. 7-15-70-23 ix.The terms and conditions governing the Software under this Participating Addendum are contained in the applicable developer's Software end user license agreements, and in any applicable Software maintenance and support agreements included with the purchase of the Software license or separately purchased by Ordering Agencies. x.With respect to Section 46, "Examination and Audit," the State's audits rights shall apply only to those records reasonably necessary to support Contractor's or Authorized Dealers' invoices and charges to the State and Ordering Agencies for products and services purchased or leased under this Participating Addendum. 5. Order of Precedence In the event of any inconsistency between the articles, attachments, or provisions which constitute this agreement, the following descending order of precedence shall apply: A. California Participating Addendum Number 7-15-70-23 B. Nevada NASPO ValuePoint Master Agreement Number 3091, subject to the changes set forth below: With respect to 3.7.4 of the Master Agreement, Contractor can provide the State with specific options to enhance data security in addition to the 3 -pass overwrite that will be performed by Contractor at no additional charge as required under 3.7.4.3. Some of these options are at an additional cost, including hard drive removal under Section 5.4.6 of the Master Agreement. The Ordering Agency is responsible for choosing what, if any, options it wants Contractor to provide beyond the included end -of -term 3 -pass overwrite, including whatever erasure standards may be required by applicable law. ii. The notification requirements of Section 5.4.7.2 of the Master Agreement, "Special Promotions," shall apply exclusively to Contractor in the event Contractor provides special promotion or pricing as a supplement to the applicable Attachment I Price Schedule. C. Canon Service Level Agreement (Exhibit B) 6. Available Products and Services This Participating Addendum includes the following Groups: Group A — Convenience Copiers Group B — Production Copiers Group C — Wide Format Group D — Printers 7. Disallowed Products and Services Contractor -supplied leasing agreements and rental options are not allowed. This restriction is not applicable to political subdivisions/local govemments. Page 3 of 9 Participating Addendum No. 7-15-70-23 8. Price List A. Contractor shall submit a Product and Service Schedule (PSS) identifying all products and services offered under this Participating Addendum for the State's approval. B. The PSS shall include the following: 1) Manufacturer Part Number or Item Number 2) List Price 3) Minimum Discount off List Price 4) Contract Price C. Contractor shall maintain a website dedicated to this Participating Addendum which contains the State -approved PSS. D. Contractor shall submit a written notice of price increases/decreases and a revised PSS for the State's approval prior to updating the Contractor's dedicated website for this Participating Addendum. E. State -approved PSS will be posted on the State's eProcurement website. 9. Equipment Additions/Deletions A. Contractor may add or delete equipment introduced or removed from the market by the manufacturer under the following conditions: 1) Equipment is within existing awarded groups under the NASPO ValuePoint Master Agreement; 2) Contractor has obtained prior approval from the Nevada NASPO ValuePoint Contract Administrator; and 3) Contractor receives written approval from the California State Contract Administrator. B. Contractor shall submit a written notice of equipment additions/deletions and a revised PSS for the State's approval prior to updating the Contractor's dedicated website for this Participating Addendum. C. Contractor shall not add neW categories or groups of equipment or services under this Participating Addendum that were not originally included in the NASPO ValuePoint Master Agreement. D. Notwithstanding the provisions of this Section 9, Contractor retain discretion to remove discontinued equipment models from the list of equipment offered under this Participating Addendum in accordance with the NASPO ValuePoint Master Agreement. Page 4of9 Participating Addendum No. 7-15-70-23 10. Authorized Dealers A. State -approved Canon USA authorized dealers ("Authorized Dealers") will be posted on the State's eProcurement website. Authorized Dealers may accept orders for the sale of equipment and the performance of services under this Agreement and, with respect to such orders, shall have sole responsibility for fulfilling such orders. Charges for all orders will be invoiced individually by each Authorized Dealer and order payments will be made by the Ordering Agency directly to the Authorized Dealers. In the event of any disputes between an Authorized Dealer and the State or Ordering Agency, Canon USA shall investigate, shall consult with the Ordering Agency or State as appropriate, and shall use commercially reasonable efforts to resolve the dispute. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall relieve Contractor of its responsibilities and obligations hereunder. Contractor agrees to be fully responsible to the State for the acts and omissions of its Authorized Dealers and of persons either directly or indirectly employed by the Contractor. Contractor's obligation to pay its authorized dealers is an independent obligation from the State's obligation to make payments to the Contractor. B. As the prime contractor, contractor is responsible for reports and fees required by the terms and conditions of the NASPO ValuePoint Master Agreement and State Participating Addendum. C. Subject to the approval of the State, Authorized Dealers may be added on a quarterly basis during the term of the contract. Contractors shall notify the State of any deleted Authorized Dealers or changes to current Authorized Dealers contact information at any time during the contract term. D. Contractor shall submit an Authorized Dealer list identifying the company name, address, contact name, phone number and email of Authorized Dealers to the State's Contract Administrator for the State's approval prior to updating its California specific contract website. 11. Ordering Agency Responsibilities A. State department and political subdivision/local govemment use of this Participating Addendum is optional. B. A User Instructions guide will be prepared and administered by the State Contract Administrator. C. Ordering agencies must follow the Contractor Selection and Request for Offer (RFO) process outlined within the User Instructions guide prior to executing orders against this Participating Addendum. This section does not apply to political subdivision/local government use of this Participating Addendum. Page 5 of 9 Participating Addendum No. 7-15-70-23 12. Contractor Responsibilities Contractor or the Authorized Dealer must respond to the ordering agency's RFO to be eligible to receive a Purchase Order under this Participating Addendum. 13. Invoicing The State Participating Addendum Number and Ordering Agency Purchase Order Number shall appear on each purchase order and invoice for all purchases placed under this Participating Addendum. 14. Usage Reporting A. Contractor shall submit usage reports on a quarterly basis to the State Contract Administrator for all California entity purchases using the report template attached hereto as Attachment A. B. The report is due even when there is no activity. C. The report shall be an Excel spreadsheet transmitted electronically to the DGS mailbox at PDWSCA@dgs.ca.gov. D. Any report that does not follow the required format or that excludes information will be deemed incomplete. Contractor will be responsible for submitting corrected reports within five business days of the date of written notification from the State. E. Tax must not be included in the report, even if it is on the purchase order. E. Reports are due each quarter as follows: Reporting Period Dile Date,t;, JAN 1 to MARCH 30 APR 30 APR 1 to JUNE 30 JUL 31 JULY 1 to SEPT 30 OCT 31 OCT 1 to DEC 30 JAN 31 G. Failure to meet reporting requirements and submit the reports on a timely basis shall constitute grounds for suspension of this contract. H. Amendments for term extensions may be approved only if all due reports have been submitted to the State. 15. Administrative Fee A. Contractor shall submit a check, payable to the State of California, remitted to the Department of General Services, Procurement Division for the calculated amount equal to one percent (0.01) of the sales for the quarterly period. Page 6 of 9 Participating Addendum No. 7-15-70-23 B. Contractor must include the Participating Addendum Number on the check. Those checks submitted to the State without the Participating Addendum Number will be returned to Contractor for additional identifying information. C. Administrative fee checks shall be submitted to: State of California Department of General Services, Procurement Division Attention: Master Unit 2 707 3`d Street, 2nd Floor, MS 2-202 West Sacramento, CA 95605 D. The administrative fee shall not be included as a separately charged adjustment to Contractor's NASPO ValuePoint Master Agreement pricing. E. The administrative fee shall not be invoiced or charged as a separate line item to the ordering agency. F. Payment of the administrative fee is due irrespective of payment status on orders or service contracts from a purchasing entity. G. Administrative fee checks are due for each quarter as follows: ;Reporting Period r, 7Diii: Oate;;0 JAN 1 to MARCH 30 APR 30 APR 1 to JUNE 30 JUL 31 JULY 1 to SEPT 30 OCT 31 OCT 1 to DEC 30 JAN 31 H. Failure to meet administrative fee requirements and submit fees on a timely basis shall constitute grounds for suspension of this contract. 16. Contract Management A. The primary Contractor Contract Manager for this Participating Addendum shall be as follows: Contractor: Canon USA Name: Mike Hurley, Contract Admin. Phone: (631) 330-3613 Fax: (631) 330-5459 E -Mail: isabidadminCa�cusa.canon.com Address: 1 Canon Park Melville, NY 11747 B. Should Contractor Contract Manager information change, the Contractor will provide written notice with the updated information to the State Contract Administrator no later than ten business days after the change. Page 7 of 9 Participating Addendum No. 7-15-70-23 C. The State Contract Administrator for this Participating Addendum shall be as follows: Name: Cynthia Okoroike Phone: (916) 375-4389 Fax: (916) 375-4663 E -Mail: cyntha.okoroike(dgs.ca.gov Address: State of California Department of General Services Procurement Division 707 Third Street, 2nd Floor, MS 2-202 West Sacramento, CA 95605 D. Should State Contract Administrator information change, the State will provide written notice with the updated information to the Contractor Contract Manager no later than ten business days after the change. 17. Termination of Agreement The State may terminate this Participating Addendum at any time upon 30 days prior written notice to the Contractor. Upon termination or other expiration of this Participating Addendum, each party will assist the other party in orderly termination of the Participating Addendum and the transfer of all assets, tangible and intangible, as may facilitate the orderly, nondisrupted business continuation of each party. This provision shall not relieve the Contractor, Authorized Dealers and the Ordering Agency, as applicable, of the obligation to perform under any purchase order or other similar ordering document for the stated terms thereof if executed prior to the termination becoming effective. 18. Amendment No amendment or variation of the terms of this Participating Addendum shall be valid unless made in writing, signed by the parties and approved as required. No oral understanding or agreement not incorporated in the Participating Addendum is binding on any of the parties. Page 8 of 9 Participating Addendum No. 7-15-70-23 19. Agreement A. This Participating Addendum and the Master Agreement together with its exhibits and/or amendments, set forth the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter of all previous communications, representations or agreements, whether oral or written, with respect to the subject matter hereof. Terms and conditions inconsistent with or contrary to the terms and conditions of this Participating Addendum and the Master Agreement, together with its exhibits and/or amendments, shall not be added to or incorporated into this Participating Addendum or the Master Agreement and its exhibits and/or amendments, by any subsequent purchase order or otherwise, and any such attempts to incorporate such terms and conditions are hereby rejected. The terms and conditions of this Participating Addendum and the Master Agreement and its exhibits and/or amendments shall prevail and govern in the case of any such inconsistent or additional terms. B. By signing below Contractor agrees to offer the same products/and or services as on the Nevada NASPO ValuePoint Master Agreement Number 3091, at prices equal to or lower than the prices on that contract. C. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Participating Addendum as of the date of execution by both parties below. STATE OF CALIFORNIA Canon U.S.A., Inc. By: By: p Name: Jim Butler Name: Title: Deputy Director Title:-uC4tVi-€ mE4 f Ca-M•1Qr Date: -t y, t p ` �t �) tS Date: ple u e- Z3, 2O 5 Page 9 of 9 EXHIBIT B SERVICE LEVEL AGREEMENT (SLA) 1. Customer Level SLA 1.1 Purpose The purpose of this addendum is to define service levels; as well as provide the Customer with a defined replacement process for equipment performing below expectations. 1.2 Response Time - Fleet Vendor agrees to maintain the following service levels defined below as targets: Group Performance Criteria Quarterly Uptime A/B Average Uptime under 105ppm multifunctional devices ( within servicing territory for each dealer) Includes 95% or better over the 4 fixed quarterly intervals per year, for devices within Servicing Territory. (Excludes devices with rated speeds of 105ppm or greater) A/B Average Uptime Production Equipment 105ppm or greater (within servicing • territory for each dealer) 80% or better on all production equipment over the 4 fixed quarterly intervals per year on production level equipment within Canon's Servicing Territory. C Wide Format Devices PW900 CW650 PW340 CW900 PW500 95% or better over the 4 fixed quarterly intervals per year, for devices within Servicing Territory. D Printers (Color and Black &White) imageCLASS Models MF models imageRUNNER LBP models have the same uptime as category A/B under 105ppm See Exchange /Carry -In Policy Attached F Scanners See Exchange /Carry -In Policy Attached 6 Hours or Less - over 6 fixed quarterly intervals Average On -Site Response Time per year, for devices within a servicing territory. Except exchange models if applicable. First Time Fix 80% of all service calls or better These service levels will be measured on a quarterly basis between Vendor and the State. Servicing Territory — 50 miles within the Authorized Servicer Production Equipment - units with rated speeds 105 pages per min or faster and/or graphic production color units (excludes imageRUNNER color units). Multifunctional Devices — Black and White units with rated speeds below 105 pages per minute and business color units (imageRUNNER color units are included in this classification). For All Multi -Function devices - B/W & Color Average response time - Response time, as noted above, shall be calculated from the time the customer call is placed with our Dispatch department, until the time the Technician arrives at the individual location. Response times are calculated between 8:30am and 5:OOpm, Monday through Friday, excluding Canon holidays. For the individual location which has multiple machines and active service calls, the Technician's arrival shall stop the response time calculation for all open service calls at that location. For B/W units with rated speeds 105 pages per minute or faster and/or Graphic production color units (Excludes imageRUNNER color units) Downtime is calculated from the time a service call is placed with our Dispatch department until the time the Technician completes the repair. Uptime criteria are calculated between 8:30am and 5:OOpm, Monday through Friday, excluding Canon holidays, and exceptions outlined in the following sentence(s). Uptime requirements will not include preventative maintenance service calls, calls which could have been prevented by key operator functions outlined in unit's operation manual, calls created by user mishandling, units which are running outside the manufacturer's optimum performance volume, or units which need to be over -hauled as a result of reaching useful life, in the opinion of our Service department. For Groups A and B - Downtime is calculated from the time a service call is placed with our Dispatch department until the time the Technician completes the repair. Uptime criteria is calculated between 8:30am and 5:OOpm, Monday through Friday, excluding Canon holidays, and exceptions outlined below. Uptime requirements will not include preventative maintenance service calls, calls which could have been prevented by key operator functions outlined in unit's operation manual, calls created by user mishandling, units which are running outside the manufacturer's optimum performance volume, or units which need to be over -hauled as a result of reaching useful life, in the opinion of our Service department. Loaner Unit/Backup Production — If any unit in Groups A and B is inoperable for a period in excess of 72 hours, Vendor shall provide the Customer with either: i) A loaner unit of similar speed and capabilities until such time as the unit(s) covered by this agreement are operable, or ii) Provide the Customer with off-site manned production capabilities to accomplish the work of the unit that is inoperable at the sole cost of the Vendor. Such costs shall be limited to cost of production (service and supplies), equipment, labor, power, transportation of jobs to and from the off-site production facility and facilities. Prior to installing a substitute product, supplier will be allowed 90 days to remedy any quality or reliability issues. A designated factory authorized technician must certify each.unit's ability to produce acceptable impressions with acceptable copies between calls or uptime. The guarantee will remain in effect for the term of the contract or up to five (5) years from the date of purchase/lease, provided the equipment has not been subjected to abuse or neglect and has been continuously covered by a Maintenance Contract. This replacement policy will remain in effect for the term of the contract and is subject to the Customer remaining current with supplier's payment requirements. For groups D and F, The Exchange and Carry -Inn Product Limited Warranty would apply. 1.3 Additional Vendor Guarantees 1.3.1 Training — End-user training - Upon equipment installation shall be at no charge. Technical support training to include Network connectivity and print driver installation. Subsequent training shall be available on an ongoing basis during the contract at an additional charge. Scheduling of all training shall be mutually agreed upon during regular business hours. 1.3.2 Invoicing — Vendor shall maintain timely, accurate invoicing, less service run impressions, as defined below. Measurable Service Level Timely Invoicing Invoices will be submitted no later than the 251h of the month immediately following the close of a billing period. Accurate Invoicing Invoices do not require any credits for miss -billing Service Impressions' Vendor will credit all service run impressions within the same billing cycle 2. Reporting and Billing 2.1 Timely Reporting — Vendor shall produce reporting for the State within 30 days of the closing of the reporting period. 2.2 Timely Payment of Administrative Fees — Vendor shall produce payment for any State Specific Administrative Fee within 30 days of the closing of the reporting period. 2.3 Accuracy of Reporting — The State may request at any point proof of the reporting accuracy through the data set supporting the reporting. If the State has reason to believe that multiple and systemic reporting errors exist, that cannot be corrected to the State's satisfaction; the State may require an audit by a third party. If errors are found, the Successful vendor must reimburse the State for the cost of the auditor as well as correcting any administrative fee errors. 2.4 Accuracy of Billing — The State may request at any point proof of the billing accuracy through the data set supporting the billing. If the State has reason to believe that multiple and systemic billing errors exist, that cannot be corrected to the State's satisfaction; the State may require an audit by a third party. EXHIBIT D GENERAL PROVISIONS, CALIFORNIA INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY GSPD401IT DATED AS OF NOVEMBER 27, 2013 AS REFERENCED IN CALIFORNIA WSCA-NASPO CONTRACT PARTICIPATING ADDENDUM #7-15-70-23. [attach copy of agreement here] GSPD-401 IT (REVISED AND EFFECTIVE 11/27/2013) GENERAL PROVISIONS- INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 1. DEFINITIONS: Unless otherwise specified in the Statement of Work, the following terms shall be given the meaning shown, unless context requires otherwise. a) "Acceptance Tests" means those tests performed during the Performance Period which are intended to determine compliance of Equipment and Software with the specifications and all other Attachments incorporated herein by reference and to determine the reliability of the Equipment b) "Application Program" means a computer program which is intended to be executed for the purpose of performing useful work for the user of the information being processed. Application programs are developed or otherwise acquired by the user of the Hardware/Software system, but they may be supplied by the Contractor c) "Attachment' means a mechanical, electrical, or electronic interconnection to the Contractor -supplied Machine or System of Equipment, manufactured by other than the original Equipment manufacturer that is not connected by the Contractor. d) "Business entity" means any individual, business, partnership, joint venture, corporation, S -corporation, limited liability company, sole proprietorship, joint stock company, consortium, or other private legal entity recognized by statute. e) "Buyer" means the State's authorized contracting official. f) "Commercial Hardware" means Hardware developed or regularly used that: (i) has been sold, leased, or licensed to the general public; (ii) has been offered for sale, lease, or license to the general public; (iii) has not been offered, sold, leased, or licensed to the public but will be available for commercial sale, lease, or license in time to satisfy the delivery requirements of this Contract; or (iv) satisfies a criterion expressed in (i), (ii), or (iii) above and would require only minor modifications to meet the requirements of this Contract. g) "Commercial Software" means Software developed or regularly used that: (i) has been sold, leased, or licensed to the general public; (ii) has been offered for sale, lease, or license to the general public; (iii) has not been offered, sold, leased, or licensed to the public but will be available for commercial sale, lease, or license in time to satisfy the delivery requirements of this Contract; or (iv) satisfies a criterion expressed in (i), (ii), or (iii) above and would require only minor modifications to meet the requirements of this Contract. h) "Contract" means this Contract or agreement (including any purchase order), by whatever name known or in whatever format used i) "Custom Software" means Software that does not meet the definition of Commercial Software. j) "Contractor" means the Business Entity with whom the State enters into this Contract. Contractor shall be synonymous with "supplier", "vendor or other similar term. k) "Data Processing Subsystem" means a complement of Contractor -furnished individual Machines, including the necessary controlling elements (or the functional equivalent), Operating Software and Software, if any, which are acquired to operate as an integrated group, and which are interconnected entirely by Contractor -supplied power and/or signal cables; e.g., direct access controller and drives, a cluster of terminals with their controller, etc I) "Data Processing System (System)" means the total complement of Contractor -furnished Machines, including one or more central processors (or instruction processors), Operating Software which are acquired to operate as an integrated group. m) "Deliverables" means Goods, Software, Information Technology, telecommunications technology, Hardware, and other items (e.g. reports) to be delivered pursuant to this Contract, including any such items furnished incident to the provision of services. n) "Designated CPU(s)" means for each product, if applicable, the central processing unit of the computers or the server unit, including any associated peripheral units. If no specific "Designated CPU(s)" are specified on the Contract, the tens shall mean any and all CPUs located at the site specified therein o) "Documentation" means manuals and other printed materials necessary or useful to the State in its use or maintenance of the Equipment or Software provided hereunder. Manuals and other printed materials customized for the State hereunder constitute Work Product if such materials are required by the Statement of Work p) "Equipment "is an all-inclusive term which refers either to individual Machines or to a complete Data Processing System or Subsystem, including its Hardware and Operating Software (if any) q) "Equipment Failure" is a malfunction in the Equipment, excluding all external factors, which prevents the accomplishment of the Equipment's intended function(s) If microcode or Operating Software residing in the Equipment is necessary for the proper operation of the Equipment, a failure of such microcode or Operating Software which prevents the accomplishment of the Equipment's intended functions shall be deemed to be an Equipment Failure r) "Facility Readiness Date" means the date specified in the Statement of Work by which the State must have the site prepared and available for Equipment delivery and installation. s) "Goods" means all types of tangible personal property, including but not limited to materials, supplies, and Equipment (including computer and telecommunications Equipment) t) "Hardware" usually refers to computer Equipment and is contrasted with Software. See also Equipment. u) "Installation Date" means the date specified in the Statement of Work by which the Contractor must have the ordered Equipment ready (certified) for use by the State. v) "Information Technology" includes, but is not limited to, all electronic technology systems and services, automated information handling, System design and analysis, conversion of data, computer programming, information storage and retrieval, telecommunications which include voice, video, and data communications, requisite System controls, simulation. electronic commerce, and all related interactions between people and Machines w) "Machine" means an individual unit of a Data Processing System or Subsystem, separately identified by a type and/or model number, comprised of but not limited to mechanical, electro -mechanical, and electronic parts, microcode, and special features installed thereon and including any necessary Software, e.g., central processing unit, memory module, tape unit, card reader, etc. x) "Machine Alteration" means any change to a Contractor - supplied Machine which is not made by the Contractor, and which results in the Machine deviating from its physical, mechanical, electrical, or electronic (including microcode) design, whether or not additional devices or parts are employed in making such change y) "Maintenance Diagnostic Routines" means the diagnostic programs customarily used by the Contractor to test Equipment for proper functioning and reliability. z) "Manufacturing Materials" means parts, tools, dies, jigs, fixtures, plans, drawings, and information produced or acquired, or rights acquired, specifically to fulfill obligations set forth herein. aa) "Mean Time Between Failure (MTBF)" means the average expected or observed time between consecutive failures in a System or component. bb) "Mean Time to Repair (MTTR)" means the average expected or observed time required to repair a System or component and return it to normal operation Page 1 of 12 GSPD-4011T (REVISED AND EFFECTIVE 11/27/2013) GENERAL PROVISIONS- INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY cc) "Operating Software" means those routines, whether or not identified as Program Products, that reside in the Equipment and are required for the Equipment to perform its intended function(s), and which interface the operator, other Contractor -supplied programs, and user programs to the Equipment dd) "Operational Use Time" means for performance measurement purposes, that time during which Equipment is in actual operation by the State. For maintenance Operational Use Time purposes, that time during which Equipment is in actual operation and is not synonymous with power on time ee) "Period of Maintenance Coverage" means the period of time, as selected by the State, during which maintenance services are provided by the Contractor for a fixed monthly charge, as opposed to an hourly charge for services rendered. The Period of Maintenance Coverage consists of the Principal Period of Maintenance and any additional hours of coverage per day, and/or increased coverage for weekends and holidays. ff) "Preventive Maintenance" means that maintenance, performed on a scheduled basis by the Contractor, which is designed to keep the Equipment in proper operating condition. gg) "Principal Period of Maintenance" means any nine consecutive hours per day (usually between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m.) as selected by the State, including an official meal period not to exceed one hour, Monday through Friday, excluding holidays observed at the installation. hh) "Programming Aids" means Contractor -supplied programs and routines executable on the Contractor's Equipment which assists a programmer in the development of applications including language processors, sorts, communications modules, data base management systems, and utility routines, (tape -to -disk routines, disk -to -print routines, etc.). ii) "Program Product" means programs, routines, subroutines, and related items which are proprietary to the Contractor and which are licensed to the State for its use, usually on the basis of separately stated charges and appropriate contractual provisions. "Remedial Maintenance" means that maintenance performed by the Contractor which results from Equipment (including Operating Software) failure, and which is performed as required, i.e., on an unscheduled basis. kk) "Software" means an all-inclusive tern which refers to any computer programs, routines, or subroutines supplied by the Contractor, including Operating Software, Programming Aids, Application Programs, and Program Products. II) "Software Failure"means a malfunction in the Contractor - supplied Software, other than Operating Software, which prevents the accomplishment of work, even though the Equipment (including its Operating Software) may still be capable of operating properly. For Operating Software failure, see definition of Equipment Failure mm) "State" means the government of the State of California, its employees and authorized representatives, including without limitation any department, agency, or other unit of the government of the State of California. nn) "System" means the complete collection of Hardware, Software and services as described in this Contract, integrated and functioning together, and performing in accordance with this Contract. oo) "U.S. Intellectual Property Rights" means intellectual property rights enforceable in the United States of America, including without limitation rights in trade secrets, copyrights, and U.S. patents. ll) 2. CONTRACT FORMATION: a) If this Contract results from a sealed bid offered in response to a solicitation conducted pursuant to Chapters 2 (commencing with Section 10290), 3 (commencing with Section 12100), and 3.6 (commencing with Section 12125) of Part 2 of Division 2 of the Public Contract Code (PCC), then Contractor's bid is a firm offer to the State which is accepted by the issuance of this Contract and no further action is required by either party. b) If this Contract results from a solicitation other than described in paragraph a), above, the Contractor's quotation or proposal is deemed a firm offer and this Contract document is the State's acceptance of that offer c) If this Contract resulted from a joint bid, it shall be deemed one indivisible Contract. Each such joint Contractor will be jointly and severally liable for the performance of the entire Contract The State assumes no responsibility or obligation for the division of orders or purchases among joint Contractors 3. COMPLETE INTEGRATION: This Contract, including any documents incorporated herein by express reference, is intended to be a complete integration and there are no prior or contemporaneous different or additional agreements pertaining to the subject matter of the Contract. 4. SEVERABILITY: The Contractor and the State agree that if any provision of this Contract is found to be illegal or unenforceable, such term or provision shall be deemed stricken and the remainder of the Contract shall remain in full force and effect. Either party having knowledge of such term or provision shall promptly inform the other of the presumed non -applicability of such provision 5. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR: Contractor and the agents and employees of the Contractor, in the performance of this Contract, shall act in an independent capacity and not as officers or employees or agents of the State. 6. APPLICABLE LAW: This Contract shall be governed by and shall be interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of California; venue of any action brought with regard to this Contract shall be in Sacramento County, Sacramento, Califomia The United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods shall not apply to this Contract. 7. COMPLIANCE WITH STATUTES AND REGULATIONS: a) The State and the Contractor warrants and certifies that in the performance of this Contract, it will comply with all applicable statutes, rules, regulations and orders of the United States and the State of California. The Contractor agrees to indemnify the State against any loss, cost. damage or liability by reason of the Contractor's violation of this provision b) The State will notify the Contractor of any such claim in writing and tender the defense thereof within a reasonable time; and c) The Contractor will have sole control of the defense of any action on such claim and all negotiations for its settlement or compromise; provided that (i) when substantial principles of government or public law are involved, when litigation might create precedent affecting future State operations or liability, or when involvement of the State is otherwise mandated by law, the State may participate in such action at its own expense with respect to attorneys' fees and costs (but not liability); (ii) where a settlement would impose liability on the State, affect principles of California government or public law, or impact the authority of the State, the Department of General Services will have the right to approve or disapprove any settlement or compromise, which approval will not unreasonably be withheld or delayed; and (iii) the State will reasonably cooperate in the defense and in any related settlement negotiations d) If this Contract is in excess of $554,000, it is subject to the requirements of the World Trade Organization (WTO) Government Procurement Agreement (GPA). e) To the extent that this Contract falls within the scope of Government Code Section 11135, the Contractor hereby agrees to respond to and resolve any complaint brought to Page 2 of 12 GSPD-401 IT (REVISED AND EFFECTIVE 11/27/2013) GENERAL PROVISIONS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY its attention, regarding accessibility of its products or services. 8. CONTRACTOR'S POWER AND AUTHORITY: The Contractor warrants that it has full power and authority to grant the rights herein granted and will hold the State harmless from and against any loss, cost, liability, and expense (including reasonable attorney fees) arising out of any breach of this warranty. Further, the Contractor avers that it will not enter into any arrangement with any third party which might abridge any rights of the State under this Contract a) The State will notify the Contractor of any such claim in writing and tender the defense thereof within a reasonable time; and b) The Contractor will have sole control of the defense of any action on such claim and all negotiations for its settlement or compromise; provided that (i) when substantial principles of govemment or public law are involved, when litigation might create precedent affecting future State operations or liability, or when involvement of the State is otherwise mandated by law, the State may participate in such action at its own expense with respect to attorneys' fees and costs (but not liability); (ii) where a settlement would impose liability on the State, affect principles of California government or public law, or impact the authority of the State, the Department of General Services will have the right to approve or disapprove any settlement or compromise, which approval will not unreasonably be withheld or delayed; and (iii) the State will reasonably cooperate in the defense and in any related settlement negotiations. 9. ASSIGNMENT: This Contract shall not be assignable by the Contractor in whole or in part without the written consent of the State The State's consent shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. For the purpose of this paragraph, the State will not unreasonably prohibit the Contractor from freely assigning its right to payment, provided that the Contractor remains responsible for its obligations hereunder 10. WAIVER OF RIGHTS: Any action or inaction by the State or the failure of the State on any occasion, to enforce any right or provision of the Contract, shall not be construed to be a waiver by the State of its rights hereunder and shall not prevent the State from enforcing such provision or right on any future occasion. The rights and remedies of the State herein are cumulative and are in addition to any other rights or remedies that the State may have at law or in equity. 11. ORDER OF PRECEDENCE: In the event of any inconsistency between the articles, attachments, specifications or provisions which constitute this Contract, the following order of precedence shall apply: a) These General Provisions — Information Technology (In the instances provided herein where the paragraph begins: "Unless otherwise specified in the Statement of Work" provisions specified in the Statement of Work replacing these paragraphs shall take precedence over the paragraph referenced in these General Provisions); b) Contract form, i.e., Purchase Order STD 65, Standard Agreement STD 213, etc , and any amendments thereto; c) Statement of Work, including any specifications incorporated by reference herein; d) Cost worksheets; and e) All other attachments incorporated in the Contract by reference. 12. PACKING AND SHIPMENT: a) All Goods are to be packed in suitable containers for protection in shipment and storage, and in accordance with applicable specifications. Each container of a multiple container shipment shall be identified to: i) show the number of the container and the total number of containers in the shipment; and ii) the number of the container in which the packing sheet has been enclosed b) All shipments by the Contractor or its subcontractors must include packing sheets identifying: the State's Contract number; item number; quantity and unit of measure; part number and description of the Goods shipped; and appropriate evidence of inspection, if required. Goods for different Contracts shall be listed on separate packing sheets c) Shipments must be made as specified in this Contract, as it may be amended, or otherwise directed in writing by the State's Transportation Management Unit within the Department of General Services, Procurement Division. 13. TRANSPORTATION COSTS AND OTHER FEES OR EXPENSES: No charge for delivery, drayage, express, parcel post, packing, cartage, insurance, license fees, permits, cost of bonds, or for any other purpose will be paid by the State unless expressly included and itemized in the Contract. a) The Contractor must strictly follow Contract requirements regarding Free on Board (F.O.B.), freight terms and routing instructions The State may permit use of an alternate carrier at no additional cost to the State with advance written authorization of the Buyer. b) If "prepay and add" is selected, supporting freight bills are required when over $50, unless an exact freight charge is approved by the Transportation Management Unit within the Department of General Services Procurement Division and a waiver is granted. • c) On "F O.B. Shipping Point" transactions, should any shipments under the Contract be received by the State in a damaged condition and any related freight loss and damage claims filed against the carrier or carriers be wholly or partially declined by the carrier or carriers with the inference that damage was the result of the act of the shipper such as inadequate packaging or loading or some inherent defect in the Equipment and/or material, the Contractor, on request of the State, shall at Contractor's own expense assist the State in establishing carrier liability by supplying evidence that the Equipment and/or material was properly constructed, manufactured, packaged, and secured to withstand normal transportation conditions 14. DELIVERY: The Contractor shall strictly adhere to the delivery and completion schedules specified in this Contract. Time, if stated as a number of days, shall mean calendar days unless otherwise specified The quantities specified herein are the only quantities required. If the Contractor delivers in excess of the quantities specified herein, the State shall not be required to make any payment for the excess Deliverables, and may return them to Contractor at the Contractors expense or utilize any other rights available to the State at law or in equity. 15. SUBSTITUTIONS: Substitution of Deliverables may not be tendered without advance written consent of the Buyer. The Contractor shall not use any specification in lieu of those contained in the Contract without written consent of the Buyer. 16. INSPECTION, ACCEPTANCE AND REJECTION: Unless otherwise specified in the Statement of Work: a) When acquiring Commercial Hardware or Commercial Software, the State shall rely on Contractor's existing quality assurance system as a substitute for State inspection and testing. For all other acquisitions, Contractor and its subcontractors will provide and maintain a quality assurance system acceptable to the State covering Deliverables and services under this Contract and will tender to the State only those Deliverables that have been inspected and found to conform to this Contract's requirements. The Contractor will keep records evidencing inspections and their result, and will make these records available to the State during Contract performance and for three years after final payment. The Contractor shall permit the State to review procedures, practices, processes, and related documents to determine the acceptability of the Contractor's quality assurance System or other similar business practices related to performance of the Contract Page 3 of 12 GSPD-401 IT (REVISED AND EFFECTIVE 11/27/2013) GENERAL PROVISIONS - b) All Deliverables may be subject to inspection and test by the State or its authorized representatives. c) The Contractor and its subcontractors shall provide all reasonable facilities for the safety and convenience of inspectors at no additional cost to the State. The Contractor shall furnish to inspectors all information and data as may be reasonably required to perform their inspection. d) Subject to subsection 16 (a) above, all Deliverables may be subject to final inspection, test and acceptance by the State at destination, notwithstanding any payment or inspection at source.. e) The State shall give written notice of rejection of Deliverables delivered or services performed hereunder within a reasonable time after receipt of such Deliverables or performance of such services. Such notice of rejection will state the respects in which the Deliverables do not substantially conform to their specifications. If the State does not provide such notice of rejection within fifteen (15) days of delivery for purchases of Commercial Hardware or Commercial Software or thirty (30) days of delivery for all other purchases, such Deliverables and services will be deemed to have been accepted Acceptance by the State will be final and irreversible, except as it relates to latent defects, fraud, and gross mistakes amounting to fraud Acceptance shall not be construed to waive any warranty rights that the State might have at law or by express reservation in this Contract with respect to any nonconformity. f) Unless otherwise specified in the Statement of Work, title to Equipment shall remain with the Contractor and assigns, if any, until such time as successful acceptance testing has been achieved. Title to a special feature installed on a Machine and for which only a single installation charge was paid shall pass to the State at no additional charge, together with title to the Machine on which it was installed. 17. SAMPLES: a) Samples of items may be required by the State for inspection and specification testing and must be furnished free of expense to the State. The samples fumished must be identical in all respects to the products bid and/or specified in the Contract. b) Samples, if not destroyed by tests, may, upon request made at the time the sample is furnished, be returned at the Contractor's expense 18. WARRANTY: a) Unless otherwise specified in the Statement of Work, the warranties in this subsection a) begin upon delivery of the goods or services in question and end one (1) year thereafter The Contractor warrants that (i) Deliverables and services furnished hereunder will substantially conform to the requirements of this Contract (including without limitation all descriptions, specifications, and drawings identified in the Statement of Work), and (ii) the Deliverables will be- free from material defects in materials and workmanship. Where the parties have agreed to design specifications (such as a Detailed Design Document) and incorporated the same or equivalent in the Statement of Work directly or by reference, the Contractor will warrant that it's Deliverables provide all material functionality required thereby. In addition to the other warranties set forth herein, where the Contract calls for delivery of Commercial Software, the Contractor warrants that such Software wit perform in accordance with its license and accompanying Documentation. The State's approval of designs or specifications furnished by Contractor shall not relieve the Contractor of its obligations under this warranty. b) The Contractor warrants that Deliverables furnished hereunder (i) will be free, at the time of delivery, of harmful code (i.e. computer viruses, worms, trap doors, time bombs, disabling code, or any similar malicious mechanism designed to interfere with the intended operation of, or cause damage to, computers, data, or Software); and (ii) will not infringe or violate any U.S. Intellectual Property Right INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, if the State believes that harmful code may be present in any Commercial Software delivered hereunder, the Contractor will, upon the State's request, provide a new or clean install of the Software. c) Unless otherwise specified in the Statement of Work: (i) The Contractor does not warrant that any Software provided hereunder is error -free or that it will run without immaterial interruption. (ii) The Contractor does not warrant and will have no responsibility for a claim to the extent that it arises directly from (A) a modification made by the State, unless such modification is approved or directed by the Contractor, (B) use of Software in combination with or on products other than as specified by the Contractor, or (C) misuse by the State. (iii) Where the Contractor resells Commercial Hardware or Commercial Software it purchased from a third party, Contractor, to the extent it is legally able to do so, will pass through any such third party warranties to the State and will reasonably cooperate in enforcing them. Such warranty pass-through will not relieve the Contractor from Contractor's warranty obligations set forth above d) All warranties, including special warranties specified elsewhere herein, shall inure to the State, its successors, assigns, customer agencies and governmental users of the Deliverables or services. e) Except as may be specifically provided in the Statement of Work or elsewhere in this Contract, for any breach of the warranties provided in this Section, the State's exclusive remedy and the Contractor's sole obligation will be limited to: (i) re -performance, repair, or replacement of the nonconforming Deliverable (including without limitation an infringing Deliverable) or service: or (ii) should the State in its sole discretion consent, refund of all amounts paid by the State for the nonconforming Deliverable or service and payment to the State of any additional amounts necessary to equal the State's Cost to Cover. "Cost to Cover" means the cost, properly mitigated, of procuring Deliverables or services of equivalent capability, function, and performance The payment obligation in subsection (e)(ii) above will not exceed the limits on the Contractor's liability set forth in the Section entitled "Limitation of Liability." f) EXCEPT FOR THE EXPRESS WARRANTIES SPECIFIED IN THIS SECTION, THE CONTRACTOR MAKES NO WARRANTIES EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE 19. SAFETY AND ACCIDENT PREVENTION: In performing work under this Contract on State premises, the Contractor shall conform to any specific safety requirements contained in the Contract or as required by law or regulation. The Contractor shall take any additional precautions as the State may reasonably require for safety and accident prevention purposes. Any violation of such rules and requirements, unless promptly corrected, shall be grounds for termination of this Contract in accordance with the default provisions hereof 20. INSURANCE: The Contractor shall maintain all commercial general liability insurance, workers' compensation insurance and any other insurance required under the Contract. The Contractor shall furnish insurance certificate(s) evidencing required insurance coverage acceptable to the State, including endorsements showing the State as an "additional insured" if required under the Contract Any required endorsements requested by the State must be separately provided; merely referring to such coverage on the certificates(s) is insufficient for this purpose When performing work on state owned or controlled property, Contractor shall provide a waiver of subrogation in favor of the State for its workers' compensation policy. 21.TERMINATION FOR NON -APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS: Page 4 of 12 GSPD-401 IT (REVISED AND EFFECTIVE 11/27/2013) GENERAL PROVISIONS- INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY a) If the term of this Contract extends into fiscal years subsequent to that in which it is approved, such continuation of the Contract is contingent on the appropriation of funds for such purpose by the Legislature. If funds to effect such continued payment are not appropriated, the Contractor agrees to take back any affected Deliverables furnished under this Contract, terminate any services supplied to the State under this Contract, and relieve the State of any further obligation therefor. b) The State agrees that if it appears likely that subsection a) above will be invoked, the State and Contractor shall agree to take all reasonable steps to prioritize work and Deliverables and minimize the incurrence of costs prior to the expiration of funding for this Contract. c) THE STATE AGREES THAT IF PARAGRAPH a) ABOVE IS INVOKED, COMMERCIAL HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE THAT HAS NOT BEEN PAID FOR SHALL BE RETURNED TO THE CONTRACTOR IN SUBSTANTIALLY THE SAME CONDITION IN WHICH DELIVERED TO THE STATE, SUBJECT TO NORMAL WEAR AND TEAR THE STATE FURTHER AGREES TO PAY FOR PACKING, CRATING, TRANSPORTATION TO THE CONTRACTOR'S NEAREST FACILITY AND FOR REIMBURSEMENT TO THE CONTRACTOR FOR EXPENSES INCURRED FOR THEIR ASSISTANCE IN SUCH PACKING AND CRATING. 22. TERMINATION FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE STATE: a) The State may terminate performance of work under this Contract for its convenience in whole or, from time to time, in part, if the Department of General Services, Deputy Director Procurement Division, or designee, determines that a termination is in the State's interest. The Department of General Services, Deputy Director, Procurement Division, or designee, shall terminate by delivering to the Contractor a Notice of Termination specifying the extent of termination and the effective date thereof. b) After receipt of a Notice of Termination, and except as directed by the State, the Contractor shall immediately proceed with the following obligations, as applicable, regardless of any delay in determining or adjusting any amounts due under this clause. The Contractor shall: (i) Stop work as specified in the Notice of Termination. (ii) Place no further subcontracts for materials, services, or facilities, except as necessary to complete the continuing portion of the Contract. (iii) Terminate all subcontracts to the extent they relate to the work terminated. (iv) Settle all outstanding liabilities and termination settlement proposals arising from the termination of subcontracts; c) After termination, the Contractor shall submit a final termination settlement proposal to the State in the form and with the information prescribed by the State. The Contractor shall submit the proposal promptly, but no later than 90 days after the effective date of termination, unless a different time is provided in the Statement of Work or in the Notice of Termination. d) The Contractor and the State may agree upon the whole or any part of the amount to be paid as requested under subsection (c) above. e) Unless otherwise set forth in the Statement of Work, if the Contractor and the State fail to agree on the amount to be paid because of the termination for convenience, the State will pay the Contractor the following amounts; provided that in no event will total payments exceed the amount payable to the Contractor if the Contract had been fully performed: (i) The Contract price for Deliverables or services accepted or retained by the State and not previously paid for, adjusted for any savings on freight and other charges; and (ii) The total of: A) The reasonable costs incurred in the performance of the work terminated, including initial costs and preparatory expenses allocable thereto, but excluding any cost attributable to Deliverables or services paid or to be paid; B) The reasonable cost of settling and paying termination settlement proposals under terminated subcontracts that are properly chargeable to the terminated portion of the Contract; and C) Reasonable storage, transportation, demobilization, unamortized overhead and capital costs, and other costs reasonably incurred by the Contractor in winding down and terminating its work. f) The Contractor will use generally accepted accounting principles, or accounting principles otherwise agreed to in writing by the parties, and sound business practices in determining all costs claimed, agreed to, or determined under this clause. 23. TERMINATION FOR DEFAULT: a) The State may, subject to the clause titled "Force Majeure" and to sub -section d) below, by written notice of default to the Contractor, terminate this Contract in whole or in part if the Contractor fails to: i) Deliver the Deliverables or perform the services within the time specified in the Contract or any amendment thereto; ii) Make progress, so that the lack of progress endangers performance of this Contract; or iii) Perform any of the other provisions of this Contract. b) The State's right to terminate this Contract under sub -section a) above, may be exercised only if the failure constitutes a material breach of this Contract and if the Contractor does not cure such failure within the time frame stated in the State's cure notice, which in no event will be less than fifteen (15) days, unless the Statement of Work calls for a different period. c) If the State terminates this Contract in whole or in part pursuant to this Section, it may acquire, under terms and in the manner the Buyer considers appropriate, Deliverables or services similar to those terminated, and the Contractor will be liable to the State for any excess costs for those Deliverables and services, including without limitation costs third party vendors charge for Manufacturing Materials (but subject to the clause entitled "Limitation of Liability"). However, the Contractor shall continue the work not terminated. d) If the Contract is terminated for default, the State may require the Contractor to transfer title, or in the case of licensed Software, license, and deliver to the State, as directed by the Buyer, any: (i) completed Deliverables, (ii) partially completed Deliverables, and, (iii) subject to provisions of sub -section e) below, Manufacturing Materials related to the terminated portion of this Contract. Nothing in this sub -section d) will be construed to grant the State rights to Deliverables that it would not have received had this Contract been fully performed. Upon direction of the Buyer, the Contractor shall also protect and preserve property in its possession in which the State has an interest. e) The State shall pay Contract price for completed Deliverables delivered and accepted and items the State requires the Contractor to transfer under section (d) above. Unless the Statement of Work calls for different procedures or requires no -charge delivery of materials, the Contractor and Buyer shall attempt to agree on the amount of payment for Manufacturing Materials and other materials delivered and accepted by the State for the protection and preservation of the property; provided that where the Contractor has billed the State for any such materials, no additional charge will apply Failure to agree will constitute a dispute under the Disputes clause. The State may withhold from these amounts any sum it determines to be necessary to protect the State against loss because of outstanding liens or claims of former lien holders. Page 5 of 12 GSPD-401IT (REVISED AND EFFECTIVE 11/27/2013) GENERAL PROVISIONS- INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY f) If, after termination, it is determined by a final decision that the Contractor was not in default, the rights and obligations of the parties shall be the same as if the termination had been issued for the convenience of the State. Both parties, State and Contractor, upon any termination for default, have a duty to mitigate the damages suffered by it. h) The rights and remedies of the State in this clause are in addition to any other rights and remedies provided by law or under this Contract, and are subject to the clause titled "Limitation of Liability " 24. FORCE MAJEURE: Except for defaults of subcontractors at any tier, the Contractor shall not be liable for any excess costs if the failure to perform the Contract arises from causes beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the Contractor. Examples of such causes include, but are not limited to: a) Acts of God or of the public enemy, and b) Acts of the federal or State govemment in either its sovereign or contractual capacity. If the failure to perform is caused by the default of a subcontractor at any tier, and if the cause of the default is beyond the control of both the Contractor and subcontractor, and without the fault or negligence of either, the Contractor shall not be liable for any excess costs for failure to perform. 25. RIGHTS AND REMEDIES OF STATE FOR DEFAULT: a) In the event any Deliverables furnished or services provided by the Contractor in the performance of the Contract should fail to conform to the requirements herein, or to the sample submitted by the Contractor, the State may reject the same, and it shall become the duty of the Contractor to reclaim and remove the item promptly or to correct the performance of services, without expense to the State, and immediately replace all such rejected items with others conforming to the Contract. b) In addition to any other rights and remedies the State may have, the State may require the Contractor, at Contractor's expense, to ship Deliverables via air freight or expedited routing to avoid or minimize actual or potential delay if the delay is the fault of the Contractor. c) In the event of the termination of the Contract, either in whole or in part, by reason of default or breach by the Contractor, any loss or damage sustained by the State in procuring any items which the Contractor agreed to supply shall be bome and paid for by the Contractor (but subject to the clause entitled "Limitation of Liability'). d) The State reserves the right to offset the reasonable cost of all damages caused to the State against any outstanding invoices or amounts owed to the Contractor or to make a claim against the Contractor therefore. 26. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY: a) Except as may be otherwise approved by the Department of General Services Deputy Director, Procurement Division or their designee, Contractor's liability for damages to the State for any cause whatsoever, and regardless of the form of action, whether in Contract or in tort, shall be limited to the Purchase Price. For purposes of this sub -section a), "Purchase Price" will mean the aggregate Contract price; except that, with respect to a Contract under which multiple purchase orders will be issued (e.g., a Master Agreement or Multiple Award Schedule contract), "Purchase Price" will mean the total price of the purchase order for the Deliverable(s) or service(s) that gave rise to the loss, such that the Contractor will have a separate limitation of liability for each purchase order b) The foregoing limitation of liability shall not apply (i) to any liability under the General Provisions entitled "Compliance with Statutes and Regulations" (ii) to liability under the General Provisions; entitled "Patent, Copyright, and Trade Secret Indemnity" or to any other liability (including without limitation indemnification obligations) for infringement of third party intellectual property rights; (iii) to claims arising under provisions herein calling for indemnification for third party claims against the State for death, bodily injury to persons or damage to real or tangible personal property caused by the g) Contractor's negligence or willful misconduct; or (iv) to costs or attorney's fees that the State becomes entitled to recover as a prevailing party in -any action c) The State's liability for damages for any cause whatsoever, and regardless of the form of action, whether in Contract or in tort, shall be limited to the Purchase Price, as that term is defined in subsection a) above Nothing herein shall be construed to waive or limit the State's sovereign immunity or any other immunity from suit provided by law. d) In no event will either the Contractor or the State be liable for consequential, incidental, indirect, special, or punitive damages, even if notification has been given as to the possibility of such damages, except (i) to the extent that the Contractor's liability for such damages is specifically set forth in the Statement of Work or (ii) to the extent that the Contractor's liability for such damages arises out of sub- section b)(i), b)(ii), or b)(iv) above. 27. CONTRACTOR'S LIABILITY FOR INJURY TO PERSONS OR DAMAGE TO PROPERTY: a) The Contractor shall be liable for damages arising out of injury to the person and/or damage to the property of the State, employees of the State, persons designated by the State for training, or any other person(s) other than agents or employees of the Contractor, designated by the State for any purpose, prior to, during, or subsequent to delivery, installation, acceptance, and use of the Deliverables either at the Contractor's site or at the State's place of business, provided that the injury or damage was caused by the fault or negligence of the Contractor. b) The Contractor shall not be liable for damages arising out of or caused by an alteration or an Attachment not made or installed by the Contractor, or for damage to alterations or Attachments that may result from the normal operation and maintenance of the Deliverables provided by the Contractor during the Contract. 28. INDEMNIFICATION: The Contractor agrees to indemnify, defend and save harmless the State, its officers, agents and employees from any and all third party claims, costs (including without limitation reasonable attorneys' fees), and losses due to the injury or death of any individual, or the loss or damage to any real or tangible personal property, resulting from the willful misconduct or negligent acts or omissions of the Contractor or any of its affiliates, agents, subcontractors, employees, suppliers, or laborers fumishing or supplying work, services, materials, or supplies in connection with the performance of this Contract. Such defense and payment will be conditional upon the following: a) The State will notify the Contractor of any such claim in writing and tender the defense thereof within a reasonable time; and b) The Contractor will have sole control of the defense of any action on such claim and all negotiations for its settlement or compromise; provided that (i) when substantial principles of government or public law are involved, when litigation might create precedent affecting future State operations or liability, or when involvement of the State is otherwise mandated by law, the State may participate in such action at its own expense with respect to attorneys' fees and costs (but not liability); (ii) where a settlement would impose liability on the State, affect principles of Califomia government or public law, or impact the authority of the State, the Department of General Services will have the right to approve or disapprove any settlement or compromise, which approval will not unreasonably be withheld or delayed; and (iii) the State will reasonably cooperate in the defense and in any related settlement negotiations 29. INVOICES: Unless otherwise specified, invoices shall be sent to the address set forth herein. Invoices shall be submitted in triplicate and shall include the Contract number; release order number (if applicable); item number; unit price, extended item price and invoice total amount State sales tax and/or use tax shall be itemized separately and added to each invoice as applicable. Page 6 of 12 GSPD-401 IT (REVISED AND EFFECTIVE 11/27/2013) GENERAL PROVISIONS -- 30. REQUIRED PAYMENT DATE: Payment will be made in accordance with the provisions of the California Prompt Payment Act, Government Code Section 927 et. seq Unless expressly exempted by statute, the Act requires State agencies to pay properly submitted, undisputed invoices not more than 45 days after (i) the date of acceptance of Deliverables or performance of services; or (ii) receipt of an undisputed invoice, whichever is later. 31. TAXES: Unless otherwise required by law, the State of California is exempt from Federal excise taxes. The State will only pay for any State or local sales or use taxes on the services rendered or Goods supplied to the State pursuant to this Contract. 32. NEWLY MANUFACTURED GOODS: All Goods furnished under this Contract shall be newly manufactured Goods or certified as new and warranted as new by the manufacturer; used or reconditioned Goods are prohibited, unless otherwise specified. 33. CONTRACT MODIFICATION: No amendment or variation of the terms of this Contract shall be valid unless made in writing, signed by the parties and approved as required. No oral understanding or agreement not incorporated in the Contract is binding on any of the parties 34. CONFIDENTIALITY OF DATA: All financial, statistical, personal, technical and other data and information relating to the State's operation which are designated confidential by the State and made available to the Contractor in order to carry out this Contract, or which become available to the Contractor in carrying out this Contract, shall be protected by the Contractor from unauthorized use and disclosure through the observance of the same or more effective procedural requirements as are applicable to the State. The identification of all such confidential data and information as well as the State's procedural requirements for protection of such data and information from unauthorized use and disclosure shall be provided by the State in writing to the Contractor. If the methods and procedures employed by the Contractor for the protection of the Contractor's data and information are deemed by the State to be adequate for the protection of the State's confidential information, such methods and procedures may be used, with the written consent of the State, to carry out the intent of this paragraph. The Contractor shall not be required under the provisions of this paragraph to keep confidential any data or information which is or becomes publicly available, is already rightfully in the Contractor's possession without obligation of confidentiality, is independently developed by the Contractor outside the scope of this Contract, or is rightfully obtained from third parties. 35. NEWS RELEASES: Unless otherwise exempted, news releases, endorsements, advertising, and social media content pertaining to this Contract shall not be made without prior written approval of the Department of General Services. 36. DOCUMENTATION: a) The Contractor agrees to provide to the State, at no charge, all Documentation as described within the Statement of Work, and updated versions thereof, which are necessary or useful to the State in its use of the Equipment or Software provided hereunder. The Contractor agrees to provide additional Documentation at prices not in excess of charges made by the Contractor to its other customers for similar Documentation. b) If the Contractor is unable to perform maintenance or the State desires to perform its own maintenance on Equipment purchased under this Contract then upon written notice by the State the Contractor will provide at Contractor's then current rates and fees adequate and reasonable assistance including relevant Documentation to allow the State to maintain the Equipment based on the Contractors methodology. The Contractor agrees that the State may reproduce such Documentation for its own use in maintaining the Equipment. If the Contractor is unable to perform maintenance, the Contractor agrees to license any other Contractor that the State may have hired to maintain the Equipment to use the above noted Documentation. The State agrees to include the Contractor's copyright notice on INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY any such Documentation reproduced, in accordance with copyright instructions to be provided by the Contractor. 37. RIGHTS IN WORK PRODUCT: a) All inventions, discoveries, intellectual property, technical communications and records originated or prepared by the Contractor pursuant to this Contract including papers, reports, charts, computer programs, and other Documentation or improvements thereto, and including the Contractor's administrative communications and records relating to this Contract (collectively, the 'Work Product"), shall be the Contractor's exclusive property. The provisions of this sub -section a) may be revised in a Statement of Work b) Software and other materials developed or otherwise obtained by or for the Contractor or its affiliates independently of this Contract or applicable purchase order ("Pre -Existing Materials') do not constitute Work Product. If the Contractor creates derivative works of Pre -Existing Materials, the elements of such derivative works created pursuant to this Contract constitute Work Product, but other elements do not Nothing in this Section 37 will be construed to interfere with the Contractor's or its affiliates' ownership of Pre -Existing Materials. c) The State will have Government Purpose Rights to the Work Product as Deliverable or delivered to the State hereunder. "Govemment Purpose Rights" are the unlimited, irrevocable, worldwide, perpetual, royalty -free, non-exclusive rights and licenses to use, modify, reproduce, perform, release, display, create derivative works from, and disclose the Work Product. "Government Purpose Rights" also include the right to release or disclose the Work Product outside the State for any State government purpose and to authorize recipients to use, modify, reproduce, perform, release, display, create derivative works from, and disclose the Work Product for any State government purpose. Such recipients of the Work Product may include, without limitation, State Contractors, California local govemments, the U S federal government, and the State and local govemments of other states. "Government Purpose Rights" do not include any rights to use, modify. reproduce, perform, release, display create derivative works from, or disclose the Work Product for any commercial purpose. d) The ideas, concepts, know-how, or techniques relating to data processing, developed during the course of this Contract by the Contractor or jointly by the Contractor and the State may be used by either party without obligation of notice or accounting. e) This Contract shall not preclude the Contractor from developing materials outside this Contract that are competitive, irrespective of their similarity to materials which might be delivered to the State pursuant to this Contract 38. SOFTWARE LICENSE: Unless otherwise specified in the Statement of Work, the Contractor hereby grants to the State and the State accepts from the Contractor, subject to the terms and conditions of this Contract, a perpetual, irrevocable, royalty -free, non-exclusive, license to use the Software Products in this Contract (hereinafter referred to as "Software Products"). a) The State may use the Software Products in the conduct of its own business, and any division thereof b) The license granted above authorizes the State to use the Software Products in machine-readable form on the Computer System located at the site(s) specified in the Statement of Work Said Computer System and its associated units (collectively referred to as CPU) are as designated in the Statement of Work If the designated CPU is inoperative due to malfunction, the license herein granted shall be temporarily extended to authorize the State to use the Software Products, in machine-readable form, on any other State CPU until the designated CPU is returned to operation. Page 7 of 12 GSPD-401 IT (REVISED AND EFFECTIVE 11/27/2013) GENERAL PROVISIONS- INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY c) By prior written notice, the State may redesignate the CPU in which the Software Products are to be used provided that the redesignated CPU is substantially similar in size and scale at no additional cost. The redesignation shall not be limited to the original site and will be effective upon the date specified in the notice of redesignation d) Acceptance of Commercial Software (including third party Software) and Custom Software will be govemed by the terms and conditions of this Contract. 39. PROTECTION OF PROPRIETARY SOFTWARE AND OTHER PROPRIETARY DATA: a) The State agrees that all material appropriately marked or identified in writing as proprietary, and furnished hereunder are provided for the State's exclusive use for the purposes of this Contract only. All such proprietary data shall remain the property of the Contractor The State agrees to take all reasonable steps to insure that such proprietary data are not disclosed to others, without prior written consent of the Contractor, subject to the California Public Records Act. b) The State will insure, prior to disposing of any media, that any licensed materials contained thereon have been erased or otherwise destroyed. c) The State agrees that it will take appropriate action by instruction, agreement or otherwise with its employees or other persons permitted access to licensed software and other proprietary data to satisfy its obligations in this Contract with respect to use, copying, modification, protection and security of proprietary software and other proprietary data. 40. RIGHT TO COPY OR MODIFY: a) Any Software Product provided by the Contractor in machine-readable form may be copied, in whole or in part, in printed or machine-readable form for use by the State with the designated CPU, to perform one-time benchmark tests, for archival or emergency restart purposes, to replace a worn copy, to understand the contents of such machine- readable material, or to modify the Software Product as provided below provided, however, that no more than the number of printed copies and machine-readable copies as specified in the Statement of Work will be in existence under this Contract at any time without prior written consent of the Contractor Such consent shall not be unreasonably withheld by the Contractor. The original, and any copies of the Software Product, in whole or in part, which are made hereunder shall be the property of the Contractor. b) The State may modify any non -personal computer Software Product, in machine-readable form, for its own use and merge it into other program material. Any portion of the Software Product included in any merged program material shall be used only on the designated CPUs and shall be subject to the terms and conditions of the Contract. 41. FUTURE RELEASES: Unless otherwise specifically provided in this Contract, or the Statement of Work, if improved versions, e.g., patches, bug fixes, updates or releases, of any Software Product are developed by the contractor, and are made available to other licensees, they will be made available to the State at no additional cost only if such are made available to other licensees at no additional cost. If the Contractor offers new versions or upgrades to the Software Product, they shall be made available to the State at the State's option at a price no greater than the Contract price plus a price increase proportionate to the increase from the list price of the original version to that of the new version, if any. If the Software Product has no list price, such price increase will be proportionate to the increase in average price from the original to the new version, if any, as estimated by the Contractor in good faith. 42. ENCRYPTION/CPU ID AUTHORIZATION CODES: a) When Encryption/CPU Identification (ID) authorization codes are required to operate the Software Products, the Contractor will provide all codes to the State with delivery of the Software. b) In case of an inoperative CPU, the Contractor will provide a temporary encryption/CPU ID authorization code to the State for use on a temporarily authorized CPU until the designated CPU is retumed to operation. c) When changes in designated CPUs occur, the State will notify the Contractor via telephone and/or facsimile/e-mail of such change Upon receipt of such notice, the Contractor will issue via telephone and/or facsimile/e-mail to the State within 24 hours, a temporary encryption ID authorization code for use on the newly designated CPU until such time as permanent code is assigned. 43. PATENT, COPYRIGHT AND TRADE SECRET INDEMNITY: a) Contractor will indemnify, defend, and save harmless the State, its officers, agents, and employees, from any and all third party claims, costs (including without limitation reasonable attorneys' fees), and losses for infringement or violation of any U S Intellectual Property Right by any product or service provided hereunder. With respect to claims arising from computer Hardware or Software manufactured by a third party and sold by Contractor as a reseller, Contractor will pass through to the State such indemnity rights as it receives from such third party ("Third Party Obligation") and will cooperate in enforcing them; provided that if the third party manufacturer fails to honor the Third Party Obligation, Contractor will provide the State with indemnity protection equal to that called for by the Third Party Obligation, but in no event greater than that called for in the first sentence of this Section ). The provisions of the preceding sentence apply only to third party computer Hardware or Software sold as a distinct unit and accepted by the State Unless a Third Party Obligation provides otherwise, the defense and payment obligations set forth in this Section will be conditional upon the following: (i) The State will notify the Contractor of any such claim in writing and tender the defense thereof within a reasonable time; and (ii) The Contractor will have sole control of the defense of any action on such claim and all negotiations for its settlement or compromise; provided that (a) when substantial principles of government or public law are involved, when litigation might create precedent affecting future State operations or liability, or when involvement of the State is otherwise mandated by law, the State may participate in such action at its own expense with respect to attorneys' fees and costs (but not liability); (b) where a settlement would impose liability on the State, affect principles of California govemment or public law, or impact the authority of the State, the Department of General Services will have the right to approve or disapprove any settlement or compromise, which approval will not unreasonably be withheld or delayed; and (c) the State will reasonably cooperate in the defense and in any related settlement negotiations b) Should the Deliverables, or the operation thereof, become, or in the Contractor's opinion are likely to become, the subject of a claim of infringement or violation of a U.S Intellectual Property Right, the State shall permit the Contractor, at its option and expense, either to procure for the State the right to continue using the Deliverables, or to replace or modify the same so that they become non -infringing If none of these options can reasonably be taken, or if the use of such Deliverables by the State shall be prevented by injunction, the Contractor agrees to take back such Deliverables and make every reasonable effort to assist the State in procuring substitute Deliverables. If, in the sole opinion of the State, the return of such Page 8 of 12 GSPD-401 IT (REVISED AND EFFECTIVE 11/27/2013) GENERAL PROVISIONS- INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY infringing Deliverables makes the retention of other Deliverables acquired from the Contractor under this Contract impractical, the State shall then have the option of terminating such Contracts, or applicable portions thereof, without penalty or termination charge. The Contractor agrees to take back such Deliverables and refund any sums the State has paid the Contractor less any reasonable amount for use or damage. c) The Contractor shall have no liability to the State under any provision of this clause with respect to any claim of patent, copyright or trade secret infringement which is based upon: (i) The combination or utilization of Deliverables fumished hereunder with Equipment, Software or devices not made or fumished by the Contractor; or, (ii) The operation of Equipment furnished by the Contractor under the control of any Operating Software other than, or in addition to, the current version of Contractor -supplied Operating Software; or (iii) The modification initiated by the State, or a third party at the State's direction, of any Deliverable furnished hereunder; or (iv) The combination or utilization of Software fumished hereunder with non -contractor supplied Software. d) The Contractor certifies that it has appropriate systems and controls in place to ensure that State funds will not be used in the performance of this Contract for the acquisition, operation or maintenance of computer Software in violation of copyright laws. 44. DISPUTES: a) The parties shall deal in good faith and attempt to resolve potential disputes informally. If the dispute persists, the Contractor shall submit to the contracting Department Director or designee a mitten demand for a final decision regarding the disposition of any dispute between the parties arising under, related to or involving this Contract. Contractor's mitten demand shall be fully supported by factual information, and if such demand Involves a cost adjustment to the Contract, the Contractor shall include with the demand a mitten statement signed by an authorized person indicating that the demand is made in good faith, that the supporting data are accurate and complete and that the amount requested accurately reflects the Contract adjustment for which Contractor believes the State is liable. The contracting Department Director or designee shall have 30 days after receipt of Contractor's written demand invoking this Section "Disputes" to render a mitten decision. If a written decision is not rendered within 30 days after receipt of the Contractor's demand, it shall be deemed a decision adverse to the Contractor's contention. If the Contractor is not satisfied with the decision of the contracting Department Director or designee, the Contractor may appeal the decision, in writing, within 15 days of its issuance (or the expiration of the 30 day period in the event no decision is rendered by the contracting department), to the Department of General Services, Deputy Director, Procurement Division, who shall have 45 days to render a final decision. If the Contractor does not appeal the decision of the contracting Department Director or designee, the decision shall be conclusive and binding regarding the dispute and the Contractor shall be barred from commencing an action in court, or with the Victims Compensation Government Claims Board, for failure to exhaust Contractor's administrative remedies. b) Pending the final resolution of any dispute arising under, related to or involving this Contract, Contractor agrees to diligently proceed with the performance of this Contract, including the delivery of Goods or providing of services in accordance with the State's instructions regarding this Contract. Contractor's failure to diligently proceed in accordance with the State's instructions regarding this Contract shall be considered a material breach of this Contract. c) Any final decision of the State shall be expressly identified as such, shall be in writing, and shall be signed by the Deputy Director, Procurement Division if an appeal was made. If the Deputy Director, Procurement Division fails to render a final decision within 45 days after receipt of the Contractor's appeal for a final decision, it shall be deemed a final decision adverse to the Contractor's contentions The State's final decision shall be conclusive and binding regarding the dispute unless the Contractor commences an action in a court of competent jurisdiction to contest such decision within 90 days following the date of the final decision or one (1) year following the accrual of the cause of action, whichever is later d) For disputes involving purchases made by the Department of General Services, Procurement Division, the Contractor shall submit to the Department Director or designee a written demand for a final decision, which shall be fully supported in the manner described in subsection a above. The Department Director or designee shall have 30 days to render a final decision. If a final decision is not rendered within 30 days after receipt of the Contractor's demand, it shall be deemed a final decision adverse to the Contractor's contention. The final decision shall be conclusive and binding regarding the dispute unless the Contractor commences an action in a court of competent jurisdiction to contest such decision within 90 days following the date of the final decision or one (1) year following the accrual of the cause of action, whichever is later. e) The dates of decision and appeal in this section may be modified by mutual consent, as applicable, excepting the time to commence an action in a court of competent jurisdiction. 45. STOP WORK: a) The State may, at any time, by written Stop Work Order to the Contractor, require the Contractor to stop all, or any part, of the work called for by this Contract for a period up to 45 days after the Stop Work Order is delivered to the Contractor, and for any further period to which the parties may agree. The Stop Work Order shall be specifically identified as such and shall indicate it is issued under this clause. Upon receipt of the Stop Work Order, the Contractor shall immediately comply with its terms and take all reasonable steps to minimize the incurrence of costs allocable to the work covered by the Stop Work Order during the period of work stoppage. Within a period of 45 days after a Stop Work Order is delivered to the Contractor, or within any extension of that period to which the parties shall have agreed, the State shall either. (i) Cancel the Stop Work Order; or (ii) Terminate the work covered by the Stop Work Order as provided for in the termination for default or the termination for convenience clause of this Contract. b) If a Stop Work Order issued under this clause is canceled or the period of the Stop Work Order or any extension thereof expires, the Contractor shall resume work. The State shall make an equitable adjustment in the delivery schedule, the Contract price, or both, and the Contract shall be modified, in writing, accordingly, if: (i) The Stop Work Order results in an increase in the time required for, or in the Contractor's cost properly allocable to the performance of any part of this Contract; and (ii) The Contractor asserts its right to an equitable adjustment within 60 days after the end of the period of work stoppage; provided, that if the State decides the facts justify the action, the State may receive and act upon a proposal submitted at any time before final payment under this Contract. c) If a Stop Work Order is not canceled and the work covered by the Stop Work Order is terminated in accordance with the provision entitled Termination for the Convenience of the State, the State shall allow reasonable costs resulting from the Stop Work Order in arriving at the termination settlement. Page 9 of 12 GSPD-401 IT GENERAL PROVISIONS - d) The State shall not be liable to the Contractor for loss of profits because of a Stop Work Order issued under this clause. 46. EXAMINATION AND AUDIT: The Contractor agrees that the State or its designated representative shall have the right to review and copy any records and supporting documentation directly pertaining to performance of this Contract. The Contractor agrees to maintain such records for possible audit for a minimum of three (3) years after final payment, unless a longer period of records retention is stipulated The Contractor agrees to allow the auditor(s) access to such records during normal business hours and in such a manner so as to not interfere unreasonably with normal business activities and to allow interviews of any employees or others who might reasonably have information related to such records Further, the Contractor agrees to include a similar right of the State to audit records and interview staff in any subcontract related to performance of this Contract The State shall provide reasonable advance written notice of such audit(s) to the Contractor. 47. FOLLOW-ON CONTRACTS: a) If the Contractor or its affiliates provides Technical Consulting and Direction (as defined below), the Contractor and its affiliates: (i) will not be awarded a subsequent Contract to supply the service or system, or any significant component thereof, that is used for or in connection with any subject of such Technical Consulting and Direction; and (ii) will not act as consultant to any person or entity that does receive a Contract described in sub -section (i). This prohibition will continue for one (1) year after termination of this Contract or completion of the Technical Consulting and Direction, whichever comes later b) "Technical Consulting and Direction" means services for which the Contractor received compensation from the State and includes: (i) development of or assistance in the development of work statements, specifications, solicitations, or feasibility studies; (ii) development or design of test requirements; (Hi) evaluation of test data; (iv) direction of or evaluation of another Contractor; (v) provision of formal recommendations regarding the acquisition of Information Technology products or services; or (vi) provisions of formal recommendations regarding any of the above. For purposes of this Section, "affiliates" are employees, directors, partners, joint venture participants, parent corporations, subsidiaries, or any other entity controlled by, controlling, or under common control with the Contractor. Control exists when an entity owns or directs more than fifty percent (50%) of the outstanding shares or securities representing the right to vote for the election of directors or other managing authority. c) To the extent permissible by law, the Director of the Department of General Services, or designee, may waive the restrictions set forth in this Section by written notice to the Contractor if the Director determines their application would not be in the State's best interest. Except as prohibited by law, the restrictions of this Section will not apply: (i) to follow-on advice given by vendors of commercial off-the-shelf products, including Software and Hardware, on the operation, integration, repair, or maintenance of such products after sale; or (ii) where the State has entered into a master agreement for Software or services and the scope of work at the time of Contract execution expressly calls for future recommendations among the Contractor's own products. d) The restrictions set forth in this Section are in addition to conflict of interest restrictions imposed on public Contractors (REVISED AND EFFECTIVE 11/27/2013) INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY by California law ("Conflict Laws"). In the event of any inconsistency, such Conflict Laws override the provisions of this Section, even if enacted after execution of this Contract. 48 PRIORITY HIRING CONSIDERATIONS: If this Contract includes services in excess of $200,000, the Contractor shall give priority consideration in filling vacancies in positions funded by the Contract to qualified recipients of aid under Welfare and Institutions Code Section 11200 in accordance with PCC Section 10353. 49. COVENANT AGAINST GRATUITIES: The Contractor warrants that no gratuities (in the form of entertainment, gifts, or otherwise) were offered or given by the Contractor, or any agent or representative of the Contractor, to any officer or employee of the State with a view toward securing the Contract or securing favorable treatment with respect to any determinations concerning the performance of the Contract. For breach or violation of this warranty, the State shall have the right to terminate the Contract, either in whole or in part, and any loss or damage sustained by the State in procuring on the open market any items which the Contractor agreed to supply shall be bome and paid for by the Contractor. The rights and remedies of the State provided in this clause shall not be exclusive and are in addition to any other rights and remedies provided by law or in equity. 50. NONDISCRIMINATION CLAUSE: a) During the performance of this Contract, the Contractor and its subcontractors shall not unlawfully discriminate, harass or allow harassment, against any employee or applicant for employment because of sex, sexual orientation, race, color, ancestry, religious creed, national origin, disability (including HIV and AIDS), medical condition (cancer), age, marital status, and denial of family care leave. The Contractor and subcontractors shall insure that the evaluation and treatment of their employees and applicants for employment are free from such discrimination and harassment. The Contractor and subcontractors shall comply with the provisions of the Fair Employment and Housing Act (Govemment Code, Section 12990 et seq.) and the applicable regulations promulgated thereunder (California Code of Regulations, Title 2, Section 7285.0 et seq.). The applicable regulations of the Fair Employment and Housing Commission implementing Government Code Section 12990 (a -f), set forth in Chapter 5 of Division 4 of Title 2 of the California Code of Regulations are incorporated into this Contract by reference and made a part hereof as if set forth in full. The Contractor and its subcontractors shall give written notice of their obligations under this clause to labor organizations with which they have a collective bargaining or other agreement. b) The Contractor shall include the nondiscrimination and compliance provisions of this clause in all subcontracts to perform work under the Contract. 51. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD CERTIFICATION: The Contractor swears under penalty of perjury that no more than one final, unappealable finding of contempt of court by a federal court has been issued against the Contractor within the immediately preceding two-year period because of the Contractor's failure to comply with an order of the National Labor Relations Board. This provision is required by, and shall be construed in accordance with, PCC Section 10296. 52. ASSIGNMENT OF ANTITRUST ACTIONS: Pursuant to Government Code Sections 4552, 4553, and 4554, the following provisions are incorporated herein: a) In submitting a bid to the State, the supplier offers and agrees that if the bid is accepted, it will assign to the State all rights, title, and interest in and to all causes of action it may have under Section 4 of the Clayton Act (15 U.S.0 15) or under the Cartwright Act (Chapter 2, commencing with Section 16700, of Part 2 of Division 7 of the Business and Professions Code), arising from purchases of Goods, material or other items, or services by the supplier for sale to the State pursuant to the solicitation. Such assignment shall Page 10 of 12 GSPD-401IT (REVISED AND EFFECTIVE 11/27/2013) GENERAL PROVISIONS- INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY be made and become effective at the time the State tenders final payment to the supplier. b) If the State receives, either through judgment or settlement a monetary recovery for a cause of action assigned under this chapter, the assignor shall be entitled to receive reimbursement for actual legal costs incurred and may, upon demand, recover from the State any portion of the recovery, including treble damages, attributable to overcharges that were paid by the assignor but were not paid by the State as part of the bid price, less the expenses incurred in obtaining that portion of the recovery c) Upon demand in writing by the assignor, the assignee shall, within one year from such demand, reassign the cause of action assigned under this part if the assignor has been or may have been injured by the violation of law for which the cause of action arose and (i) the assignee has not been injured thereby, or (ii) the assignee declines to file a court action for the cause of action. 53. DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE CERTIFICATION: The Contractor certifies under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the Contractor will comply with the requirements of the Drug -Free Workplace Act of 1990 (Government Code Section 8350 et seq.) and will provide a drug-free workplace by taking the following actions: a) Publish a statement notifying employees that unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensation, possession, or use of a controlled substance is prohibited and specifying actions to be taken against employees for violations, as required by Government Code Section 8355(a). b) Establish a Drug -Free Awareness Program as required by Government Code Section 8355(b) to inform employees about all of the following: (1) the dangers of drug abuse in the workplace; (ii) the person's or organization's policy of maintaining a drug-free workplace; (iii) any available counseling, rehabilitation and employee assistance programs; and, (iv) penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug abuse violations. c) Provide, as required by Government Code Section 8355(c), that every employee who works on the proposed or resulting Contract: (i) will receive a copy of the company's drug-free policy statement; and, (ii) will agree to abide by the terms of the company's statement as a condition of employment on the Contract. 54. FOUR -DIGIT DATE COMPLIANCE: Contractor warrants that it will provide only Four -Digit Date Compliant (as defined below) Deliverables and/or services to the State. "Four Digit Date Compliant" Deliverables and services can accurately process, calculate, compare, and sequence date data, including without limitation date data arising out of or relating to leap years and changes in centuries, This warranty and representation is subject to the warranty terms and conditions of this Contract and does not limit the generality of warranty obligations set forth elsewhere herein. 55. SWEATFREE CODE OF CONDUCT: a) Contractor declares under penalty of perjury that no equipment, materials, or supplies furnished to the State pursuant to the Contract have been produced in whole or in part by sweatshop labor, forced labor, convict labor, indentured labor under penal sanction, abusive forms of child labor or exploitation of children in sweatshop labor, or with the benefit of sweatshop labor, forced labor, convict labor, indentured labor under penal sanction, abusive forms of child labor or exploitation of children in sweatshop labor. The Contractor further declares under penalty of perjury that they adhere to the Sweatfree Code of Conduct as set forth on the California Department of Industrial Relations website located at www.dir.ca.gov and Public Contract Code Section 6108, b) The Contractor agrees to cooperate fully in providing reasonable access to its records, documents, agents or employees, or premises if reasonably required by authorized officials of the State, the Department of Industrial Relations, or the Department of Justice to determine the Contractor's compliance with the requirements under paragraph (a). 56. RECYCLED CONTENT REOUIRMENTS: The Contractor shall certify in writing under penalty of perjury, the minimum, if not exact, percentage of post -consumer material (as defined in the Public Contract Code (PCC) Section 12200-12209), in products, materials, goods, or supplies offered or sold to the State that fall under any of the statutory categories regardless of whether the product meets the requirements of Section 12209. The certification shall be provided by the contractor, even if the product or good contains no postconsumer recycled material, and even if the postconsumer content is unknown With respect to printer or duplication cartridges that comply with the requirements of Section 12156(e), the certification required by this subdivision shall specify that the cartridges so comply (PCC 12205 (b)(2)) A state agency contracting officer may waive the certification requirements if the percentage of postconsumer material in the products, materials, goods, or supplies can be verified in a written advertisement, including, but not limited to, a product label, a catalog, or a manufacturer or vendor Internet web site. Contractors are to use, to the maximum extent economically feasible in the performance of the contract work, recycled content products (PCC 12203(d)) 57. CHILD SUPPORT COMPLIANCE ACT: For any Contract in excess of $100,000, the Contractor acknowledges in accordance with PCC Section 7110, that: a) The Contractor recognizes the importance of child and family support obligations and shall fully comply with all applicable State and federal laws relating to child and family support enforcement, including, but not limited to, disclosure of information and compliance with earnings assignment orders, as provided in Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 5200) of Part 5 of Division 9 of the Family Code; and b) The Contractor, to the best of its knowledge is fully complying with the earnings assignment orders of all employees and is providing the names of all new employees to the New Hire Registry maintained by the Califomia Employment Development Department. 58. AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT: The Contractor assures the State that the Contractor complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U S C 12101 et seq.). 59. ELECTRONIC WASTE RECYCLING ACT OF 2003: The Contractor certifies that it complies with the applicable requirements of the Electronic Waste Recycling Act of 2003, Chapter 8 5, Part 3 of Division 30, commencing with Section 42460 of the Public Resources Code. The Contractor shall maintain documentation and provide reasonable access to its records and documents that evidence compliance 60. USE TAX COLLECTION: In accordance with PCC Section 10295.1, the Contractor certifies that it complies with the requirements of Section 7101 of the Revenue and Taxation Code. Contractor further certifies that it will immediately advise the State of any change in its retailer's seller's permit or certification of registration or applicable affiliate's sellers permit or certificate of registration as described in subdivision (a) of PCC Section 10295 1. 61. EXPATRIATE CORPORATIONS: Contractor hereby declares that it is not an expatriate corporation or subsidiary of an expatriate corporation within the meaning of PCC Sections 10286 and 10286.1, and is eligible to contract with the State. 62. DOMESTIC PARTNERS: For contracts over $100,000 executed or amended after January 1, 2007, the contractor certifies that the contractor is in compliance with Public Contract Code Section 10295 3. Page 11 of 12 GSPD-401 IT (REVISED AND EFFECTIVE 11/27/2013) GENERAL PROVISIONS- INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 63. SMALL BUSINESS PARTICIPATION AND DVBE PARTICIPATION REPORTING REQUIREMENTS: a) If for this Contract the Contractor made a commitment to achieve small business participation, then the Contractor must within 60 days of receiving final payment under this Contract (or within such other time period as may be specified elsewhere in this Contract) report to the awarding department the actual percentage of small business participation that was achieved. (Govt. Code § 14841.) b) If for this Contract the Contractor made a commitment to achieve disabled veteran business enterprise (DVBE) participation, then Contractor must within 60 days of receiving final payment under this Contract (or within such other time period as may be specified elsewhere in this Contract) certify in a report to the awarding department: (1) the total amount the prime Contractor received under the Contract; (2) the name and address of the DVBE(s) that participated in the performance of the Contract; (3) the amount each DVBE received from the prime Contractor; (4) that all payments under the Contract have been made to the DVBE; and (5) the actual percentage of DVBE participation that was achieved. A person or entity that knowingly provides false information shall be subject to a civil penalty for each violation. (Mil & Vets Code § 999.5(d); Govt. Code § 14841.) 64. LOSS LEADER: It is unlawful for any person engaged in business within this state to sell or use any article or product as a "loss leader" as defined in Section 17030 of the Business and Professions Code. (PCC 12104.5(b).). Page 12 of 12 EXHIBIT E WSCA-NASPO CONTRACT FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA (MASTER AGREEMENT #3091 FOR COPIERS, PRINTERS AND RELATED DEVICES) AS IMPLEMENTED IN CALIFORNIA THROUGH THE PARTICIPATING ADDENDUM #7-15-70-23. [attach copy of agreement here] PARTICIPATING ADDENDUM WSCA-NASPO COOPERATIVE PURCHASING ORGANIZATION COPIERS, PRINTERS & RELATED DEVICES 14-19 Administered by the State of Nevada (hereinafter "Lead State") WSCA MASTER AGREEMENT Canon U.S.A., Inc Nevada RFP 3091 (hereinafter "Contractor") And Commonwealth of Kentucky (hereinafter "Participating State") MA 758 1500000977 Amendment #1 dated 12/17/15 Page 1 of6 1. $cope: This addendum covers the Copiers, Printers & Related Devices 14-19 lead by the State of Nevada for use by Authorized NON EXECUTIVE BRANCH STATE AGENCIES ONLY and other entities located in the Participating State authorized by that state's statutes to utilize state contracts, which includes local public agencies of the Commonwealth as defined in KRS 45A.345(11). Each authorized using agency must establish its own separate agreement if applicable with the awarded contractor for products and services. Contractor has been awarded devices and services in the following categories: Group A - Convenience Copiers Group B - Production Copiers Group C - Wide Format Copiers Group D - Printers Group F - Scanners 2. Participation: This addendum is for authorized NON EXECUTIVE BRANCH AGENCIES ONLY. Executive Branch State Agencies (as indicated in the following web link http://ogendoor.ky.govlaccountability/gengov/Pages/executive asps) may NOT utilize this addendum and must participate in the Managed Print Contract (MPS), MA 768 1300000391. Executive Branch State Agencies must contact the Commonwealth Office of Technology (COT) regarding the MPS Contract. 3. Participating State Modifications or Additions to WSCA Master Agreement; This addendum is for the full scope of products and services awarded in the WSCA contract between WSCA and the awarded contractor. With respect to 3.7.4 of the Master Agreement, Contractor can provide Customer with specific options to enhance data security besides the 3 -pass overwrite that will be performed by Contractor at no additional charge as required under 3.7.4.3. Some of these options are at an additional cost, including hard drive removal under Section 5.4.6 of the Master Agreement. Customer is responsible for choosing what, if any, options it wants Contractor to provide beyond the included end -of -term 3 -pass overwrite, including whatever erasure standards may be required by applicable law. PARTICIPATING ADDENDUM WSCA-NASPO COOPERATIVE PURCHASING ORGANIZATION COPIERS, PRINTERS & RELATED DEVICES 14-19 Administered by the State of Nevada (hereinafter "Lead State") WSCA MASTER AGREEMENT Canon U.S.A., Inc Nevada RFP 3091 (hereinafter "Contractor") And Commonwealth of Kentucky (hereinafter "Participating State") MA 758 1800000977 Amendment #1 dated 12/17/15 Page 2 of 6 The notification requirements of Section 5.4.7.2 of the Master Agreement, "Special Promotions," shall apply exclusively to Contractor in the event Contractor provides special promotion or pricing as a supplement to the applicable Attachment I Price Schedule. Notwithstanding the warranty provisions set forth in Sections 11.4.1 and 11.4.2 of the Master Agreement, the State and Participating Entities shall instead be entitled to the benefits of the generally available Canon warranty (or, in the case of third party products, the manufacturer's or developer's warranty), as applicable, for the hardware and software, including all warranty remedies. Under Section 11.4.2.3 of the Master Agreement, "Infringement Indemnity," and Section 14.b. of Attachment D to the Master Agreement (WSCA-NASPO Master Agreement Terms and Conditions), "Indemnification -Intellectual Property," Contractor's indemnification obligations for infringement apply exclusively with respect to a claimant's United States Intellectual Property rights and Canon or Oce brand manufactured equipment furnished hereunder. For the avoidance of doubt, Participating State acknowledges that the "work for hire" provision in Section 19 of Appendix D to the Master Agreement, "Pre -Existing Intellectual Property," does not apply to the Equipment and Services furnished under the Agreement. In no event shall Contractor, its Authorized Dealers, or the Participating State, including Participating Entities, be liable under this Participating Addendum for any special, incidental, consequential or indirect damages of any kind, regardless of whether such party knew or should have known of the possibility of such damages, 4. LeaseR Leasing is approved for the authorized using agencies ("Participating Entities"). Leases will be provided to Participating Entities under this Agreement from Canon USA's subsidiary, Canon Financial Services, Inc. ("CFS"), pursuant to the terms and conditions of the lease agreement as set forth as Exhibit A and as modified from time to time ("Least Agreement"). Exccpt as otherwise agreed to by the parties, Participating Entities may sign a Lease Agreement for the lease of only the equipment specified in the Lease Agreement at the time of execution, or Participating Entities may enter into a master Lease Agreement allowing for multiple lease orders from time to time. To initiate a lease, Participating Entities may issue an Order and reference the type of Lease Agreement (FMV, Operational, or Capital Lease) on the Order, and such Order may be issued directly to PARTICIPATING ADDENDUM WSCA-NASPO COOPERATIVE PURCHASING ORGANIZATION COPIERS, PRINTERS & RELATED DEVICES 14-19 Administered by the State of Nevada (hereinafter "Lead State") WSCA MASTER AGREEMENT Canon U.S.A., Inc Nevada RFP 3091 (hereinafter "Contractor") And Commonwealth of Kentucky (hereinafter "Participating State") MA 768 1500000977 Amendment #1 dated 12/17/15 Page 3of6 CFS or may be issued to the Authorized Dealer in which case the Authorized Dealer will assign the Order to CFS; or CFS may require the Participating Entities to sign a Lease Agreement. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Participating Addendum, in the event of a conflict between an executed Lease Agreement and this Agreement, the terms of the Lease Agreement will supersede and control. Each Lease Agreement and each Order for leasing issued prior to the termination of this Participating Addendum shall survive the termination of this Participating Addendum for any reason whatsoever, and each Order to the extent for leasing shall be non - cancellable except to the extent if at all as provided in the Lease Agreement. S. Primary Contacts: The primary contact individuals for this Participating Addendum are as follows (or their named successors): Contractor Name Canon USA, Mike Hurley, Supervisor, Contract Admin Address 1 Canon Park, Melville, NY 11747 Telephone 631-330-3613 Fax 631-330-5459 E-mail atiltirleyacuga.carton.com Prtijrpatincr Enti Name Stephanie R. Williams Address 702 Capitol Avenue, Room 096 Frankfort, KY 40601 Telephone (602) 564-8621 Fax (802) 564-6013 Stephanier.Williams a�7ky.gov E-mail 6. Authorized Dealers; All Canon USA authorized dealers in the State of Kentucky, as shown on the dedicated Canon USA (cooperative contract) website ("Authorized Dealers"), are approved to accept orders from Participating Entities for the sale of Goods and the performance of Services under the Master Agreement and this Participating Addendum and, with respect to all orders accepted by an Authorized Dealer, shall have all of the rights and obligations of "Contractor" under the Master Agreement and this Participating Addendum, including sole responsibility for fulfilling such orders. In the event of any disputes between an Authorized Dealer and a Purchaser, Canon USA PARTICIPATING ADDENDUM WSCA-NASPO COOPERATIVE PURCHASING ORGANIZATION COPIERS, PRINTERS & RELATED DEVICES 14-19 Administered by the State of Nevada (hereinafter "Lead State") WSCA MASTER AGREEMENT Canon U.S.A., Inc Nevada RFP 3091 (hereinafter "Contractor") And Commonwealth of Kentucky (hereinafter "Participating State") MA 758 1500000977 Amendment #1 dated 12/17/15 Page4of6 shall investigate, shall consult with Participating State and the Purchasing Entity as appropriate, and shall use commercially reasonable efforts to resolve the dispute. 7. Purchase Order Instructions: All orders should contain the following (1) Mandatory Language "PO is subject to WSCA-NASPO Contract # 3091 and Commonwealth of Kentucky Master Agreement # MA 758 1800000977 (2) Your Name, Address, Contact, & Phone -Number (3) Purchase order amount. Please channel your PO through one of our authorized resellers so they can arrange for proper ordering and installation of your unit. 8. Price Agreement Number: All purchase orders issued by purchasing entities within the jurisdiction of this participating addendum shall include the Participating State contract number: MA 758 1500000977 and the Lead State price agreement number: 3091. 9. Service Level Agreements ("SLAs"): The SLAs attached as Exhibit B to this Participating Addendum shall apply to Services provided by the Authorized Dealers under this Addendum. 10. Individual Customer: Each authorized Non Executive Branch State agency and political subdivision, as a Participating Entity, that purchases products/services will be treated as if they were Individual Customers. Except to the extent modified by a Participating Addendum, each authorized Non Executive Branch State agency and political subdivision will be responsible to follow the terms and conditions of the WSCA Master Agreement; and they will have the same rights and responsibilities for their purchases as the Lead State has in the WSCA Master Agreement. Each authorized Non Executive Branch State agency and political subdivision will be responsible for their own charges, fees, and liabilities. Each authorized Non Executive Branch State agency and political subdivision will have the same rights to any indemnity or to recover any costs allowed in the contract for their purchases. The Contractor will apply the charges to each Participating Entity individually. This Participating Addendum and the WSCA Master Agreement number 3091 (administered by the State of Nevada) together with its exhibits, set forth the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter of all previous PARTICIPATING ADDENDUM WSCA-NASPO COOPERATIVE PURCHASING ORGANIZATION COPIERS, PRINTERS & RELATED DEVICES 14-19 Administered by the State of Nevada (hereinafter "Lead State") WSCA MASTER AGREEMENT Canon U.S.A., Inc Nevada RFP 3091 (hereinafter "Contractor") And Commonwealth of Kentucky (hereinafter "Participating State") MA 758 1500000977 Amendment #1 dated 12/17/15 Page 5 of b communications, representations or agreements, whether oral or written, with respect to the subject matter hereof. Terms and conditions inconsistent with, contrary or in addition to the terms and conditions of this Addendum and the WSCA Master Agreement, together with its exhibits, shall not be added to or incorporated into this Addendum or the WSCA Master Agreement and its exhibits, by any subsequent purchase order or otherwise, and any such attempts to add or incorporate such terms and conditions are hereby rejected. The terms and conditions of this Addendum and the WSCA Master Agreement and its exhibits shall prevail and govern in the case of any such inconsistent or additional terms within the Participating State. 11. Governing Law This Participating Addendum shall be govemed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the Commonwealth of Kentucky and the using agency. Venue shall be the Commonwealth of Kentucky, Franklin County in accordance with KRS 4A7-245. "ISA. http://finance.ky.gov/services/eprocurement/Pages/LawsPrefRegsPolicies.aspx IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Addendum as of the date of execution by both parties below. Participating State: Commonwealth of Kentucky Comoro . wealth Office of Technology By Name: Contractor: Canon U.S.A., Inc. By: Te D. Stephens Title: Executive Director Date: *1 Name: Junic i o: take Title: Senior Vice President & G BISG Date: Dcr.srrrot.t r7,2ot5 [Additional signatures as required by Participating State] Participating State: PARTICIPATING ADDENDUM WSCA-NASPO COOPERATIVE PURCHASING ORGANIZATION COPIERS, PRINTERS & RELATED DEVICES 14-19 Administered by the State of Nevada (hereinafter "Lead State") WSCA MASTER AGREEMENT Canon U.S.A., Inc Nevada RFP 3091 (hereinafter "Contractor") And Commonwealth of Kentucky (hereinafter "Participating State") MA 758 1500000977 Amendment #1 dated 12/17/18 Page 6 of 6 Commonwealth of Kentucky Office of Procurement Services By: ('2�a_ R aJ Name•,,, Jen r. bra, ha. ilk Ti Date: et.eu,ci7V.c-liV,et 1-y 1 49 If you have questions about this Participating Addendum or the participation process, please contact: WSCA-NASPO COOPERATIVE PURCHASING ORGANIZATION Name Paul Stembler, Cooperative Development Coordinator Telephone 661-206-3858 E-mail paul.stemblerja waca-na po.ow [Frilly executed PDF copy of tlhis document should be entailed to Pfr wsca-naspo.orq to support documentation of participation and posting in appropriate data bases] Exhibit A STATE OF NEVADA SERVICE LEVEL AGREEMENT (SLA) 1. Customer Level SLA 1.1 Purpose The purpose of this addendum is to define service levels; penalties for the performance of the service levels; as well as provide the Customer with a defined replacement process for equipment performing below expectations. This SLA does not implicate or involve lease related invoicing; it involves equipment performance and maintenance issues. 1.2 Customer Service Level Agreement Contractor agrees to maintain the following service levels defined below as targets: Performance Criteria Target Level Average Uptime 96% or Better Average On -Site Response Time 4 Hours or Less* First Time Fix EO% of all service calls or better These service levels will be measurcd on a quarterly basis between Contractor and Customer. *imageClass Printer Models (Group D) and DR Scanner Models (Group F) are serviced via exchange program. Service for these products is not on site therefore, 4 hour response time does not apply. Canon agrees to perform its Services in a professional manner, consistent with Canon's applicable industry product standards. Canon's warranty is as set forth in the WSCA-NASPO MSA, Contract #3091 and Canon's response to the solicitation. 1.3 Calculation of Service Level Points Upon written request of the Customer, the Contractor will produce reporting to he measured against the Service Level Agreement and points will be assigned according to the following chart for the previous quarter. These points will be added to produce a total Service Level score. This score will be used to determine the subsequent penalty according to the following schedule where the penalty can be up to 4% of the previous quarter's service and supplies billing only (expressed as a negative %). Penalty will not apply to lease payments. Page 1 of 4 Canon USA, Inc. 1.4 Penalty The penalty shall be awarded to the Customer as a credit on the following period's service and supplies invoice. Target Level Below Target 1 Below Target 2 Below Target 3 Below Target 4 Average Uptime 98% or Higher 97.9% - 96% 95.9% - 94% 94.9% - 94% 93.9% or lower Possible Points 4 3 2 2 0 All Average On -Site Response Time (in Hours) 4 or Less 4.1 — 5 5.1 - 6 6.1 - 7 7.1 or more Possible Points 4 3 2 2 0 First Time Fix 80% or Higher 79,9% - 70% 69.9% - 60% 59.9% - 50% Less than 50% Possible Points 4 3 2 2 0 1.4 Penalty The penalty shall be awarded to the Customer as a credit on the following period's service and supplies invoice. 1.5 Equipment Performance Contractor guarantees each machine specified within any maintenance agreement will perform to either a) the monthly copies between service calls as measured by machine on a quarterly basis by group and segment listed below and/or b) the monthly uptime as measured by machine on a quarterly basis by segment listed below. Group Target Level Below Target 1 Below Target 2 Below Target 3 Below Target 4 Total Score 12-10 9-7 6-4 3-1 0 Penalty as a percentage of quarterly service and supplies billings 0% -2.5% -3,0% -3.5% -4.0% 1.5 Equipment Performance Contractor guarantees each machine specified within any maintenance agreement will perform to either a) the monthly copies between service calls as measured by machine on a quarterly basis by group and segment listed below and/or b) the monthly uptime as measured by machine on a quarterly basis by segment listed below. Group Devices Segments Quarterly Uptime A Copiers Black & White All 95% B Copiers Color All 95% C Wide Format Devices All 95% D Printers (Color and Black &White) All 95% F Scanners All 95% Page 2 of 4 Canon USA, Inc. If any unit fails to maintain this level of performance between calls and or the monthly uptime, excluding service calls caused by operator error that system will be subject to replacement at the Customers discretion on a like -for -like basis with then current technology. Prior to installing a substitute product, Contractor will be allowed 90 days to remedy any quality or reliability issues. A designated factory authorized technician must certify each unit's ability to produce acceptable impressions with acceptable copies between calls or uptime. The guarantee will remain in effect for the term of the contract or up to five (5) years from the date of purchase/lease, provided the equipment has not been subjected to abuse or neglect and has been continuously covered by a Maintenance Contract. This replacement policy will remain in effect for the term of the contract and is subject to the Customer remaining current with supplier's payment requirements. 1.6 Additional Contractor Guarantees 1.6.1 Training — On-going training as requested by the Customer to be performed within two (2) weeks of requested date for on-site training and two (2) hours for phone/technical support. A penalty of $50 per incident that does not meet the turnaround time specified to be credited on the next service bill. 1.6.2 Loaner Unit/Backup Production — If any unit is inoperable due to equipment malfunction for a period in excess of 72 hours, Contractor shall provide the Customer with either: i) A loaner unit of similar speed and capabilities until such time as the unit(s) covered by this agreement are operable, or ii) Provide the Customer with off-site manned production capabilities to accomplish the work of the unit that is inoperable at the sole cost of the Contractor. Such costs shall be limited to cost of production (service and supplies), equipment, labor, power, transportation of jobs to and from the off-site production facility and facilities. 1.6.3 Invoicing — Contractor shall maintain timely, accurate invoicing, less service run impressions, as defined below. The assigned copy machine operators, back- up personnel, and office personnel shall respond in a timely manner to the Contractor's e-mails, facsimiles, and phone calls in providing the readings. Receiving meters from Customer is a necessary step in the process of generating a complete and accurate invoice. Invoices that are generated without receiving the proper meter read information, due to the Customer's failure to provide such meter by the last day of the month, are not considered inaccurate. Failure on the Contractor's part to maintain the Service levels as defined in the table below shall result in a $50.00 per instance credit on the following invoice provided Customer has given written notice to Contractor of any such alleged invoicing Page 3 of 4 Canon USA, Inc. problem and Contractor has been allowed a 30 day cure period idler such notice to address any such issue. Measurable Service Level Timely Invoicing Invoices will be submitted no later than the 25m of the month immediately following the close of a billing period Accurate Invoicing Invoices do not require any credits for miss -billing Service Impressions Contractor will credit all service run impressions within the same billing cycle 2. Reporting and Billing 2.1 Timely Reporting - Contractor shall produce reporting for the State within 30 days of the closing of the reporting period. Failure to do so may result in a penalty of $5.00 per work day beyond the 30 day period. 2.2 Accuracy of Reporting - The State may request at any point proof of the reporting accuracy through the data set supporting the reporting. If the State has reason to believe that multiple and systemic reporting errors exist, that cannot be corrected to the State's satisfaction; the State may require an audit by a third party. If errors are found, the Contractor must reimburse the State for the cost of the auditor. 2.3 Accuracy of Billing - The State may request at any point proof of the billing accuracy through the data set supporting the billing. if the State has reason to believe that multiple and systemic billing errors exist, that cannot be corrected to the State's satisfaction; the State may require an audit by a third party. If errors are found, the Contractor must reimburse the State for the cost ofthe auditor as well as correcting any billing errors. 2.4 Penalties - All penalties under this, section two (2) of the Service Level Agreement, shall be payable to the State. IN wrrNr: s Rfi(ll:, the parties hereto have caused this Contract to be signed and intend to be legally bound thereby. Contractor Sign Icy Shannon berry Sr. VP & GM BISG Date 'title Esj rl 14--1 r_ t [+ssislunt Chief Procurement Of7iccr, Purchasing Division Date Title Page 4 of 4 Canon USA, Inc. Item No. 8 Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Patrick Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: March 27, 2018 SUBJECT: Approve an Agreement with Raceway Ford, Inc. for the Purchase of a Ford F-550XL Super Duty Truck PREPARED BY: Julie Tarrant, Senior Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve an Agreement with Raceway Ford, Inc., in the amount of $120,910.43, for the purchase of a Ford F-550XL Super Duty Chassis Cab and Utility Bed with Equipment. BACKGROUND: On September 27, 2017, the Public Works Department electronically posted on the City of Temecula' on-line bidding service, Planet Bids, a Request for Quote (RFQ), for the purchase of a Ford 550 F550 XL Super Duty Chassis Cab and Utility Bed with Equipment, RFQ No. 034. We received two responsive bids by the submission deadline of October 12, 2017. The solicitation included the City's local preference program; however, it did not affect the award of this purchase. Final bid results were as follows; 1. Raceway Ford, Riverside $120,910.43 2. Tom's Truck Center, Santa Fe Springs $123,021.35 Pursuant to the City's purchasing policy, staff recommends authorization of the purchase of a Ford 550 XL Super Duty Chassis Cab and Utliity Bed with Equipment from Raceway Ford, Riverside. FISCAL IMPACT: The purchase of the Ford F-550 XL Super Duty Truck is included, and adequate funds are available in the Fiscal Year 2017-18 Annual Operating Budget, Capital Outlay Vehicle and Equipment Fund. ATTACHMENTS: Agreement AGREEMENT FOR PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT BETWEEN CITY OF TEMECULA AND RACEWAY FORD, INC. FORD F-550 XL SUPER DUTY CHASSIS CAB AND UTILITY BED WITH EQUIPMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made and effective as of March 27, 2018, between the City of Temecula , a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and Raceway Ford, Inc., a Corporation, (hereinafter referred to as "Vendor"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. TERM This Agreement shall commence on March 27, 2018, and shall remain and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than December 31, 2018, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement. 2. PURCHASE AND SALE OF EQUIPMENT On and subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement and the Agreement Documents, Vendor agrees to sell and deliver to City a Ford F-550 XL Super Duty Chassis Cab and Utility Bed with Equipment, as more particularly described in Exhibit A, Description of Equipment / Scope of Work (hereafter "Equipment"), attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. 3. PURCHASE PRICE The Purchase Price which City agrees to pay to Vendor for the Equipment is One hundred and twenty thousand, nine hundred and ten dollars and forty three cents. ($120,910.43). The Purchase Price is final and shall be paid by City to Vendor in accordance with the following schedule: within thirty (30) days of receipt of non -disputed invoice. 4. REPRESENTATION AND WARRANTIES OF VENDOR Vendor makes the following representations and warranties to City: a. Authority and Consents. Vendor has the right, power, legal capacity and authority to enter into and perform its obligations under this Agreement. No approvals or consents of any persons are necessary in connection with Vendor's execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement, except for such as have been obtained on or prior to the date hereof. The execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement by Vendor have been duly authorized by all necessary action on the part of Vendor and constitute the legal, valid and binding obligations of Vendor, enforceable against Vendor in accordance with their respective terms. b. Title, License and Operating Condition. Vendor has good and marketable title to all of the Equipment. All of the Equipment is free and clear of any restrictions on or conditions to transfer or assignment, and City will acquire absolute title to all of the Equipment free and clear of mortgages, liens, pledges, charges, encumbrances, equities, claims, covenants, conditions and restrictions except for such as may be created or granted by City. All of the Equipment is in good operating condition, is free of any defects, and is in conformity with the specifications, descriptions, representations and warranties set forth in the Agreement 12/28/2017 Documents. Vendor is aware that City is purchasing the Equipment for use as a Public Works stenciling vehicle and that City is relying on the warranties of the Vendor that the Equipment is fit for this purpose and the ordinary purposes for which the Equipment is normally used. c. Full Disclosure. None of the representations and warranties made by Vendor in this Agreement contains or will contain any untrue statements of a material fact, or omits to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading. 5. TIME OF DELIVERY The date and time of delivery of the Equipment shall be on or before 245 days of receipt of purchase order. 6. PLACE OF DELIVERY The Equipment shall be delivered to the following location: City of Temecula - Public Works Department Field Operations Center 43230 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 TITLE AND RISK OF LOSS Title to and the risk of loss, damage and destruction of the Equipment shall remain with the Vendor until after inspection and acceptance of the Equipment by City. 7. INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE City shall inspect the Equipment at the time and place of delivery. Such Inspection may include reasonable tests and use of the Equipment by City. If, in the determination of City, the Equipment fails to conform to the Agreement IN ANY MANNER OR RESPECT, City shall so notify Vendor within ten (10) days of delivery of the Equipment to City. Failing such notice, the Equipment shall be deemed accepted by City as of the date of receipt. 8. REJECTION In the event of such notice of non -conformity by City pursuant to the section entitled "Acceptance" above, City may, at its option, (1) reject the whole of the Equipment, (2) accept the whole of the Equipment, or (3) accept any commercial unit or units of the Equipment and reject the remainder. The exercise of any of the above options shall be "without prejudice" and with full reservation of any rights and remedies of City attendant upon a breach. In the event of such notice and election by City, City agrees to comply with all reasonable instructions of Vendor and, in the event that expenses are incurred by City in following such instructions, Vendor shall indemnify City in full for such expenses. 9. NO REPLACEMENTS OF CURE This Agreement calls for strict compliance. Vendor expressly agrees that both the Software tendered and the tender itself will conform fully to the terms and conditions of the Agreement on the original tender. In the event of rejection by City of the whole of the Software 2 12/28/2017 or any part thereof pursuant to the section entitled "Rejection" above, City may, but is not required to, accept any substitute performance from Vendor or engage in subsequent efforts to affect a cure of the original tender by Vendor. 10. MAINTENANCE Vendor shall maintain the Equipment in accordance with the terms of the maintenance schedule attached hereto as Exhibit B, and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full. In performing the maintenance of the Equipment, Vendor shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing similar services as are required of Vendor hereunder In meeting its maintenance obligations under this Agreement. 11. INDEMNIFICATION Vendor agrees to defend, indemnify, protect, and hold harmless, the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, and its officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers, from and against any and all claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, actions, liability or damages of any kind and nature which the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, its officers, agents, employees, and volunteers may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of Vendor's negligent or wrongful acts or omissions arising out of or In any way related to the Work or the Vendor's performance or non-performance of this Agreement, excepting only liability out of the sole negligence of the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency. 12. AGREEMENT DOCUMENTS a. This Agreement includes the following documents, which are by this reference incorporated herein and made a part hereof: • Description of Equipment / Scope of Work (from the Request for Quote (RFQ), attached hereto as Exhibit A • Response/Quotation to the Request for Quote (RFQ), attached hereto as Exhibit B b. In the event any term or condition of the Agreement Documents conflicts with or is contradictory to any term or condition of the Agreement, the terms and conditions of this Agreement are controlling. c. In the event of a conflict in terms between this Agreement, the Request for Quote (RFQ) and/or the Vendor's response to the RFQ, this Agreement shall prevail over the RFQ and the Vendor's response to the RFQ. 13. REMEDIES The remedies and rights conferred on the City by this Agreement are in addition to and cumulative with all other remedies and rights accorded the City under law or equity. 14. SURVIVAL OF RERESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES 3 1 2/2 812 01 7 All representations, warranties, covenants and agreements of the parties contained in this Agreement shall survive the execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement. 15. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES The Vendor shall keep itself informed of State and Federal laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Vendor shall at all times observe and comply with all such laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Vendor to comply with this section. 16. ASSIGNMENT The Vendor shall not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of the City. This Agreement shall be binding on, and shall inure to the benefit of, the parties to it and their respective heirs, legal representatives, successors and assigns. Upon termination of the Agreement, Vendor's sole compensation shall be payment for actual equipment received. 17. SEVERABILITY If any provision of this Agreement is held invalid or unenforceable by any court of final jurisdiction, it is the intent of the parties that all other provisions of this Agreement be construed to remain fully valid, enforceable, and binding on the parties. 18. PROHIBITED INTEREST No officer, or employee of the City of Temecula that has participated in the development of this agreement or its approval shall have any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement, the proceeds thereof, the Vendor, or Vendor's sub -Contractors for this project, during hislher tenure or for one year thereafter. The Vendor hereby warrants and represents to the City that no officer or employee of the City of Temecula that has participated in the development of this agreement or its approval has any interest, whether contractual, non -contractual, financial or otherwise, in this transaction, the proceeds thereof or in the business of the Vendor or Vendor's sub -Contractors on this project. Vendor further agrees to notify the City in the event any such interest is discovered whether or not such interest is prohibited by law or this Agreement. 19. ENTIRE AGREEMENT; MODIFICATION; WAIVER This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties pertaining to the subject matter hereof and thereof and supersedes all prior and contemporaneous agreements, representations and understandings of the parties, whether oral or written. No supplement, modification or amendment of this Agreement or the Agreement Documents shall be binding unless executed in writing by all the parties. No waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement or the Agreement Documents shall be deemed, or shall constitute, a waiver of any other provision, whether or not similar, nor shall any waiver constitute a continuing waiver. No waiver shall be binding unless executed in writing by the party making the waiver. 20. NOTICES 4 12/28/2017 Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (i) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice. Notice shall be effective upon delivery to the addresses specified below or on the third business day following deposit with the document delivery service or United States Mail as provided above. Mailing Address: To Consultant: 21. EFFECTS OF HEADINGS City of Temecula Attn: City Manager 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 Raceway Ford, Inc. Attn: Mike Ladner 5900 Sycamore Canyon Blvd. Riverside, CA 92507 The subject headings of the sections and subsections of this Agreement are included for convenience only and shall not affect or be considered in the construction or interpretation of any of its provisions. 22. GOVERNING LAW This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with, and governed by, the laws of the State of California as applied to contracts that are executed and performed entirely in California. The City and Vendor understand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties, and liabilities of the parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation concerning this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event such litigation is filed by one party against the other to enforce its rights under this Agreement, the prevailing party, as determined by the court's judgment, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney fees and litigation expenses for the relief granted. 23. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of the Vendor warrants and represents that he or she has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Vendor and has the authority to bind the Vendor to the performance of its obligation hereunder. The City Manager is authorized to enter into an amendment on behalf of the City to make the following non -substantive modifications to the agreement: (a) name changes; (b) extension of time; (c) non -monetary changes in scope of work; (d) agreement termination. 5 12/28/2017 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF TEMECULA By: Matt Rahn, Mayor ATTEST: RACEWAY FORD, INC. (Two Signatures of corporate officers required unless corporate documents authorize only one person to sign the agreement on behalf of the corporation.) By: By: By: Randi Johl, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: am amberlin, Vice President Sales ark ing Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney VENDOR i e Lad j ; leet Manager Raceway Ford, Inc. Mike Ladner 5900 Sycamore Canyon Blvd., Riverside CA 92507 951-317-2101 mladner@earthlink.net 6 12/28/2017 PM Initials: Date: EXHIBIT A DESCRIPTION OF EQUIPMENT 7 12/28/2017 EXHIBIT A SPECIFICATIONS LIST NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION SpNCLUD DON (YES/NO) Gross Vehicle Weight Rating (GVWR) Minimum. 19,000 lbs. 2 Payload Capacity 12,666 lbs. 3 Engine V-10 Gasoline powered meeting all current regulations Heavy Duty Cooling 175 APM alternator (minimum) 4. Cab Regular Cab Conventional Steel Electric Horn Windshield - Laminated Glass All Tinted Mirrors - Dual Rear View Windshield Wipers — Intermitted Variable Speed Mirror 12" day/night Sun Visors Vent Windows Seats — High Back with 2 Head Restraints Seats — Vinyl, Beige or Gray Padded rubber floor mats Left and Right Arm Rests Instrument Gauge Switch Warning Devices Direct Read Speedometer Tachometer Oil Pressure Water Temperature Voltmeter and Hour Meter Back up Alarm Factory Air Conditioner Airbag - Driver Side Only 8 NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION SPINCLU� DON (YES/NO) 5. Trim / Drivelines F-550 XL -4X2 40/20/40 Split Front Seat Steel HD Vinyl 6. Transmission TorqShift 5 -Speed Automatic Transmission Oil Cooler Off Radiator 7 Tires and Wheels Reated to maximum GVWR 6 Steel Belted Radials (all season) Minimum 10 -Hole Disc 6.0 Steel Wheels 8. Chassis F-550 drw 4X2 Wheelbase 189" (approximate) Cab to Axle 84" Front Bumper -Full Width 2 Tow Hooks Mounted to Frame Front Axle -5,000 lbs. Heavy -Duty Gas Shocks 1.25" Stabilizer Bar Rear Axle (11,000 lbs. minimum) Frame -36,000 PSI Steel Top of Cab to Ground - 80.7" Top of Frame to Ground - 33.4" Axle Clearance - 8.4" Front Track - 74.8" Rear Tire - outside width 93.9" Overall Length - 250.5" Max. GVWR 19,500 (lbs.) Max. Payload 12,666 (lbs.) 9. Color Oxford White 10 Packages High -Capacity Trailer Package Specifications List continued on next page 9 NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION CIFICA SP INCLUDED (YES/NO) 11 Interior AM/FM Stereo with Two Speakers Digital Clock Manual Climate Controls Auto Door Locks Black Vinyl Flooring Manual Day/Night Rearview Mirror Manual Tilt/Telescoping Steering Column Black Urethane with Three Button Message Center Control Steering Wheel Visors with Passenger Mirror Rear Window - Fixed Power Windows 12. Factor/Dealer Warranties Furnish with Vehicle Upon Delivery 13. Owner's Manual Furnish with Vehicle Upon Delivery 14. Registration (Exempt) Dealer to Process all necessary DMV Registration Papers (No Charge for Exempt Registration) 15. Fuel Tank 40 US Gallon 16. Fuel Gasoline Standard 17. Keys 5 Sets of Vehicle Keys, with Keyless Entry 18. Brakes ABS Full Power Assisted 4-Wheel Disc Brakes Parking Brake on real, foot operated hand release Specifications List continued on next page 10 NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION SPECIFICATION ON D (YES/NO) 19. Roadline Model TPMP (Service Body) 12 GPM Hydraulic Pump One Complete Airless Paint System Stencil Rack Removable Gun Holster Below Deck Tool Box Traffic Cone Storage 30 -Gallon Headboard Hydraulic Reservoir Paint Well for Seven 5 -Gallon Containers Glass Sphere System Hydraulic -Driven Compressor Arrow Board Rotating Lights Work Light for Night Time Operation Multiple Hydraulic -Driven Paint Systems Electric Clutch 20 Service Body Body shall be steel construction and measure a minimum of 135" long by 95" wide Frame shall consist of box" construction Deck to be 1/8" diamond plate sloped sufficiently to prevent standing liquids Headboard to extend 20" above deck Frame to incorporate 2"x2" x 3'16" tubing cross member at 16" O.C. Side skirts of 12 -gauge steel Metal skirts that are not reinforced full length will not be accepted A tool box under the left side (street side) will be approximately nine cubic feet Toolbox doors must be double wall doors with synthetic weather strip seals Latches to be spring loaded, striker plate with "T" handles Doors to be bottom hinged on piano type hinge Service access doors to provide ease of access to hose reel and tool box compartments The minimum door size is 30" x 18" Access doors smaller than these minimums will not be accepted Top access door to the hose reel compartment there shall be a cut out for each spray gun allowing the gun to be locked in the hose reel compartment without disconnecting the gun from the paint hose Specifications List continued on next page I NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION SPECIFICATION INCLUDED (YES/NO) 21 Paint Storage (Service Body) Seven 1" steel rings (to prevent 5 gallons paint cans from shifting) to be mounted on a removable tray with side handles Paint storage well to be drilled for drainage Paint storage tray to be secured with 2 "T" handle bolts for easy removal 22. Gun Solvent Bath (Service Body) Dual recessed #" (min) diameter paint gun solvent bath holsters to be included in the rear panel Holsters must be removable for easy cleaning 23. Hydraulic Reservoir (Service Body) The hydraulic reservoir is to have a 30 -gallon capacity It shall be an integral part of bogy headboard It shall be mounted above the piston pump to prevent positive head Reservoir shall have incorporated into it a vent, oil filter plug, oil drain plug, and oil level sight gauge Bolt on hydraulic reservoir tanks will not be accepted 24. Hydraulic System (Service Body) A minimum 12.0 GPM at 1000RPM hydraulic gear pump with electric clutch is to be provided The pump to be engine mounted and "V" belt driven from the crankshaft pulley Engine speed to be controlled by a chassis manufactures installed electronic throttle control There shall be a 10 -micron return line spin on oil filter One1000-PSI maximum adjustable pressure regulator with gauge (0- 2000 PSI) and one 0-2000 PSI gauge for each pump to be furnished Cab mounted key switch with indicator light plus rear mounted waterproof on/off safety switch is to be included All hoses, piping, and fittings are to be SAE hydraulic rated 25 Body Lights Combination stop/turn lights, clearance lights, and side marker lights to be furnished All lights and reflectors to conform to Federal Motor Vehicle safety standard 108 made waterproof Rear lights to be recessed in body Two seal beam lights will be mounted on the truck - one will illuminate the paint well area, the other the tailgate work area A toggle switch will be located in the cab to turn these lights on and off Specifications List continued on next page 12 NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION gPNCLUD DON (YES/NO) 26 Stencil Rack (Service Body) A stencil rack constructed of 1" square steel tubing to accommodate 20 stencils stacked on edge to a height of 36" will be provided Each space will be 1 3/. " in width Four additional spaces open at the top will be included in the rack A stencil deck roller and stop will be incorporated into the rack The rack shall be attached to the deck by a minimum of 4 rust proof bolts and nuts 27. Bumper (Service Body) A real bumper shall extend across the full width of the vehicle and shall protrude a minimum of 9" The rear bumper shall be constructed of diamond plate steel and painted the color of the vehicle 28 Paint Spray System (Service Body) Two (2) SPEEFLO 989-002 Hydraulic Airless Paint Spray Systems to be furnished (no other brand of pump will be accepted) Each system to include: Airless pump with hard chrome over steel lowers, suction hose tube for 5 gallon paint pail, hydraulic connection hose, high pressure needle valve, 50 mesh paint filter and manifold, high-pressure (3300PS1) connection hose All hoses, fittings, valves, and connections shall be pressure tested to 3300 PSI Pump to be mounted on curbside of headboard 29. Hose Reel and Gun (Service Body) Two (2) spring rewind hose reels with 50' each of 1/, " high pressure (3000PSI) static grounded hose, hose ball stops, and 3' whip and hose to be furnished Graco Contractor Guns with 12" gun extensions and Zip Tip systems included with each system Fluid hose reels to be mounted on curbside Dual hose roller assemblies mounted in the rear body panel Drain holes to be provided for all cabinet spaces 30 Arrowboard (Service Body) A 36" x 72" Trifunction, 25 light arrowboard with a cab mounted remote control is to be provided The arrowboard must come with an electric lift Arrowboard to be mounted above headboard so as to be clearly visible 31 Paint (Service Body) Frame and stencil rack to be painted black Balance of truck to be painted with one prime coat and one finished coat of manufactures standard white All parts to be painted shall be thoroughly cleaned of all weld splatter, slag, scale, and other foreign matter prior to painting The unit to be undercoated throughout 13 EXHIBIT B PAYMENT RATES AND SCHEDULE The Purchase Price which City agrees to pay to Vendor for the Equipment is One hundred and twenty thousand, nine hundred and ten dollars and forty three cents. ($120,910.43). The Purchase Price is final and shall be paid by City to Vendor in accordance with the following schedule: within thirty (30) days of receipt of non -disputed invoice. 14 NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION SPECIFICATION INCLUDED (YES/NO) 1 Gross Vehicle Weight Rating (GVWR) Minimum. 19,000 lbs. v i 2 Payload Capacity 12,666 lbs. f S r 3 Engine V-10 Gasoline powered meeting all current regulations Heavy Duty Cooling 175 APM alternator (minimum) \frz-S• 4. Cab Regular CabLl Conventional Steel Electric Horn Windshield - Laminated Glass All Tinted Mirrors - Dual Rear View Windshield Wipers — Intermitted Variable Speed Mirror 12" day/night Sun Visors Vent Windows Seats — High Back with 2 Head Restraints Seats — Vinyl, Beige or Gray lS Padded rubber floor mats Left and Right Arm Rests Instrument Gauge Switch Warning Devices Direct Read Speedometer Tachometer Oil Pressure Water Temperature Voltmeter and Hour Meter Back up Alarm Factory Air Conditioner Airbag - Driver Side Only 15 NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION SPECIFICATION INCLUDED (YES/NO) 5 Trim / Drivelines F-550 XL -4X2 40/20/40 Split Front Seat Steel HD Vinyl ` -1 6 Transmission TorqShift 5 -Speed Automatic Transmission Oil Cooler Off Radiator S;,,, S r.,..,, p_IN-,,,..63.c_ 11 Ilt-- 7 Tires and Wheels Reated to maximum GVWR 6 Steel Belted Radials (all season) Minimum 10 -Hole Disc 6.0 Steel Wheels '1-1� 8. Chassis F-550 drw 4X2 Wheelbase 189" (approximate) Cab to Axle 84" Front Bumper -Full Width 2 Tow Hooks Mounted to Frame Front Axle -5,000 lbs. Heavy -Duty Gas Shocks 1.25" Stabilizer Bar Rear Axle (11,000 lbs. minimum) Frame -36,000 PSI Steel Top of Cab to Ground - 80.7" Top of Frame to Ground - 33.4" Axle Clearance - 8.4" Front Track - 74.8" Rear Tire - outside width 93.9" Overall Length - 250.5" Max. GVWR 19,500 (lbs.) Max. Payload 12,666 (lbs.) 9. Color Oxford White Lt` - t`10. 10. Packages High -Capacity Trailer Package 1 4, Specifications List continued on next page 16 NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION SPECIFICATION INCLUDED (YES/NO) 11 Interior AM/FM Stereo with Two Speakers Digital Clock Manual Climate Controls Auto Door Locks Black Vinyl Flooring Manual Day/Night Rearview Mirror Manual Tilt/Telescoping Steering Column Black Urethane with Three Button Message Center Control Steering Wheel Visors with Passenger Mirror Rear Window - Fixed Power Windows 12 Factor/Dealer Warranties Furnish with Vehicle Upon Delivery Li 1--5 13. Owner's Manual Furnish with Vehicle Upon Delivery "7,--1 14. Registration (Exempt) Dealer to Process all necessary DMV Registration Papers (No Charge for Exempt Registration) ,4 15. Fuel Tank 40 US Gallon Lh 16. Fuel Gasoline Standard `1^...f 17 Keys 5 Sets of Vehicle Keys, with Keyless Entry '7 4-f 18. Brakes ABS Full Power Assisted 4-Wheel Disc Brakes Parking Brake on real, foot operated hand release c..) Specifications List continued on next page 17 NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION SPECIFICATION INCLUDED (YES/NO) 19. Roadline Model TPMP (Service Body) 12 GPM Hydraulic Pump One Complete Airless Paint System Stencil Rack Removable Gun Holster Below Deck Tool Box Traffic Cone Storage 30 -Gallon Headboard Hydraulic Reservoir Paint Well for Seven 5 -Gallon Containers Glass Sphere System Hydraulic -Driven Compressor Arrow Board Rotating Lights Work Light for Night Time Operation Multiple Hydraulic -Driven Paint Systems Electric Clutch y `�s 20. Service Body Body shall be steel construction and measure a minimum of 135" long by 95" wide Frame shall consist of "box" construction Deck to be 1/8" diamond plate sloped sufficiently to prevent standing liquids Headboard to extend 20" above deck Frame to incorporate 2"x2" x 3'16" tubing cross member at 16" O.0 Side skirts of 12 -gauge steel Metal skirts that are not reinforced full length will not be accepted A tool box under the left side (street side) will be approximately nine cubic feet Toolbox doors must be double wall doors with synthetic weather strip seals Latches to be spring loaded, striker plate with "T" handles Doors to be bottom hinged on piano type hinge Service access doors to provide ease of access to hose reel and tool box compartments The minimum door size is 30" x 18" Access doors smaller than these minimums will not be accepted Top access door to the hose reel compartment there shall be a cut out for each spray gun allowing the gun to be locked in the hose reel compartment without disconnecting the gun from the paint hose Specifications List continued on next page 18 Specifications List continued on next page 19 NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION SPECIFICATION INCWDED (YES/NO) 21. Paint Storage (Service Body) Seven 1" steel rings (to prevent 5 gallons paint cans from shifting) to be mounted on a removable tray with side handles Paint storage well to be drilled for drainage Paint storage tray to be secured with 2 "T" handle bolts for easy removal `�-�-) l 22, Gun Solvent Bath (Service Body) Dual recessed #" (min) diameter paint gun solvent bath holsters to be included in the rear panel Holsters must be removable for easy cleaning j , `'' ( 23. Hydraulic Reservoir (Service Body) The hydraulic reservoir is to have a 30 -gallon capacity It shall be an integral part of bogy headboard It shall be mounted above the piston pump to prevent positive head Reservoir shall have incorporated into it a vent, oil filter plug, oil drain plug, and oil level sight gauge Bolt on hydraulic reservoir tanks will not be accepted 1 24. Hydraulic System (Service Body) A minimum 12.0 GPM at 1000RPM hydraulic gear pump with electric clutch is to be provided The pump to be engine mounted and "V" belt driven from the crankshaft pulley Engine speed to be controlled by a chassis manufactures installed electronic throttle control There shall be a 10 -micron retum line spin on oil filter One1000-PSI maximum adjustable pressure regulator with gauge (0- 2000 PSI) and one 0-2000 PSI gauge for each pump to be furnished Cab mounted key switch with indicator light plus rear mounted waterproof on/off safety switch is to be included All hoses, piping, and fittings are to be SAE hydraulic rated L-p� 25. Body Lights Combination stop/turn lights, clearance lights, and side marker lights to be furnished All lights and reflectors to conform to Federal Motor Vehicle safety standard 108 made waterproof Rear lights to be recessed in body Two seal beam lights will be mounted on the truck - one will illuminate the paint well area, the other the tailgate work area A toggle switch will be located in the cab to turn these lights on and off LI Specifications List continued on next page 19 NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION SPECIFICATION INCLUDED (YES/NO) 26. Stencil Rack (Service Body) A stencil rack constructed of 1" square steel tubing to accommodate 20 stencils stacked on edge to a height of 36" will be provided Each space will be 1 ' " in width Four additional spaces open at the top will be included in the rack A stencil deck roller and stop will be incorporated into the rack The rack shall be attached to the deck by a minimum of 4 rust proof bolts and nuts Lr A4 27. Bumper (Service Body) A real bumper shall extend across the full width of the vehicle and shall protrude a minimum of 9" The rear bumper shall be constructed of diamond plate steel and painted the color of the vehicle 1 " 1 1 28. Paint Spray System (Service Body) Two (2) SPEEFLO 989-002 Hydraulic Airless Paint Spray Systems to be furnished (no other brand of pump will be accepted) Each system to include: Airless pump with hard chrome over steel lowers, suction hose tube for 5 gallon paint pail, hydraulic connection hose, high pressure needle valve, 50 mesh paint filter and manifold, high-pressure (3300PS1) connection hose All hoses, fittings, valves, and connections shall be pressure tested to 3300 PSI Pump to be mounted on curbside of headboard tl I "-( 29. Hose Reel and Gun (Service Body) Two (2) spring rewind hose reels with 50' each of/. " high pressure (3000PSI) static grounded hose, hose ball stops, and 3' whip and hose to be furnished Graco Contractor Guns with 12" gun extensions and Zip Tip systems included with each system Fluid hose reels to be mounted on curbside Dual hose roller assemblies mounted in the rear body panel Drain holes to be provided for all cabinet spaces 17c` 30. Arrowboard (Service Body) A 36" x 72" Trifunction, 25 light arrowboard with a cab mounted remote control is to be provided The arrowboard must come with an electric lift Arrowboard to be mounted above headboard so as to be clearly visible ( . 7 31. Paint (Service Body) Frame and stencil rack to be painted black Balance of truck to be painted with one prime coat and one finished coat of manufactures standard white All parts to be painted shall be thoroughly cleaned of all weld splatter, slag, scale, and other foreign matter prior to painting The unit to be undercoated throughout Li 20 VENDOR INFORMATION Name of Vendor: raA cam._ live, Mo Address: Phone: E -Mall: ) tM 1-v Jam % iv.1.► ! rfric . i.es. FORD F-550 XL SUPER DUTY CHASSIS CAB Make: Model: G. Year: 'lute Color: Make: Model: i PIMP UTILITY BED Year: Color: 21 PRICE Vehicle Price: f 3t '5) Equipment Price: Sales Tax: , c �6 $ $ TOTAL PRICE: $ 1. Costs stated within the Unit Sales Price are all inclusive for Specifications listed. 2. The price is to include one complete Technical Services Manual for the truck and all other equipment plus one parts book and Owner's Manual for unit supplied. 3. Price quoted shall include all delivery and unloading charges. 4. Upon delivery, the vendor shall provide a minimum of five hour on the job training for operators and mechanics. 6. The equipment furnished under this contract shall be completely services by the vendor prior to delivery. It shall be ready for operation when delivered. Any further servicing by the vendor will not be required except in connection with repairs or adjustments covered by the manufacturer or dealer's warranty 6. The vehicle furnished shall be new and unused, current model with standard factory fittings, trim and accessories unless otherwise noted. 7. Signing this Proposal guarantees delivery within 245 days of receipt of Purchase Order. PRINT NAME OF AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE: N\ \‘`-+/t_ LM -r.r s 22 Item No. 9 Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Patrick A. Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: March 27, 2018 SUBJECT: Award of a Construction Contract to PTM General Engineering Services, Inc. for the Traffic Signal Installation — Redhawk Parkway/Vail Ranch Parkway at El Chimisal Road/Tehachapi Pass, PW15-09 PREPARED BY: Amer Attar, Principal Civil Engineer Kendra Hannah-Meistrell, Senior Civil Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1. Award a Construction Contract to PTM General Engineering Services, Inc., in the amount of $299,099, for the Traffic Signal Installation — Redhawk Parkway/Vail Ranch Parkway at El Chimisal Road/Tehachapi Pass, PW15-09; 2. Authorize the City Manager to approve Contract Change Orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $29,909.90, which is equal to 10% of the contract amount; 3. Make a finding that the Traffic Signal Installation — Redhawk Parkway/Vail Ranch Parkway at El Chimisal Road/Tehachapi Pass project is exempt from Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) fees. BACKGROUND: On September 5, 2017, City Council approved the plans and specifications and authorized the Department of Public Works to solicit construction bids for the Traffic Signal Installation — Redhawk Parkway/Vail Ranch Parkway at El Chimisal Road/Tehachapi Pass, PW15-09. The Traffic Signal Installation — Redhawk Parkway/Vail Ranch Parkway at El Chimisal Road/Tehachapi Pass project is necessary to mitigate impacts from traffic generated by the Terracina development outside the City limits. The City was able to secure $250,000 from the developer of Terracina to contribute to the installation costs. The subject intersection is located on a major arterial adjacent to an elementary school. Vehicle movements are uncontrolled along the major arterial with stop signs at El Chimisal Road and Tehachapi Pass. This traffic signal is necessary and will improve school area safety and traffic circulation. Eight bids were electronically received and opened through PlanetBids on Tuesday, March 6, 2018. The results were as follows: 1. PTM General Engineering Services, Inc. $299,099 2. DBX, Inc. $313,561 3. Elecnor Belco Electric, Inc. $326,291 4. California Professional Engineering Inc. $338,900 5. Calpromax Engineering, Inc. $347,900 Asplundh Construction LLC Non-responsive Traffic Loops Crackfilling, Inc. Non-responsive Lekos Electric, Inc. Non-responsive Asplundh Construction, LLC and Lekos Electric, Inc. have been deemed non-responsive because the bidder's signatures were not notarized on the Non -Collusion Affidavits. Traffic Loops Crackfilling, Inc. has been deemed non-responsive because the bidder's signature was not notarized on the Bid Bond. Staff has reviewed the bid proposals and found PTM General Engineering Services, Inc. of Riverside, California to be the lowest responsible bidder for this project. PTM General Engineering Services, Inc. has public contracting experience and has completed similar projects for other public agencies in Southern California. The Engineer's Estimate for the project was $260,000. The project specifications allow for 40 working days, which is an approximate duration of two months. The Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) is an element of the Riverside County Integrated Project (RCIP) to conserve open space, nature preserves and wildlife to be set aside in some areas. It is designed to protect over 150 species and conserve over 500,000 acres in Western Riverside County. The City of Temecula is a permittee to the MSHCP and as such is required to abide by the Regional Conservation Authority's (RCA) Fee Remittance and Collection Policy adopted by Resolution 07-04 on September 10, 2007. The RCA is a joint regional authority formed by the County and the Cities to provide primary policy direction for implementation of the MSHCP. Since July 1, 2008, the RCA has required that locally funded Capital Improvement Projects contribute applicable MSHCP fees within 90 -days of construction contract award. Fees outside the public right of way are calculated on a cost per acre of disturbed area basis, while fees for typical right-of-way improvements projects are 5% of construction costs. Projects funded by TUMF or Measure A are exempt from MSHCP fees, as those programs contribute directly to the MSHCP. The Traffic Signal Installation — Redhawk Parkway/Vail Ranch Parkway at El Chimisal Road/Tehachapi Pass project is exempt from MSHCP fees because this project is not considered capacity enhancing (i.e., does not increase capacity) and there is no new disturbed area. FISCAL IMPACT: The Traffic Signal Installation — Redhawk Parkway/Vail Ranch Parkway at El Chimisal Road/Tehachapi Pass is identified in the City's Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Budget for Fiscal Years 2018-22, and is funded with Developer Contributions and Development Impact Fees — Traffic Signal. Adequate funds are available for the contract amount of $299,099.00, plus a 10% contingency amount of $29,909.90, for a total encumbrance of $329,008.90. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Contract 2. Project Description 3. Project Location CITY OF TEMECULA, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT for TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION — REDHAWK PARKWAY/VAIL RANCH PARKWAY AT EL CHIMISAL ROAD/TEHACHAPI PASS PROJECT NO. PW15-09 THIS CONTRACT, made and entered into the 27th day of March, 2018 by and between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City", and PTM General Engineering Services, Inc., hereinafter referred to as "Contractor." WITNESSETH: That City and Contractor, for the consideration hereinafter named, mutually agree as follows: 1. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS The complete Contract includes all of the Contract Documents, to wit: Notice Inviting Bids, Instructions to Bidders, Proposal, Performance Bond, Labor and Materials Bond, Plans and Specifications entitled TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION — REDHAWK PARKWAY/VAIL RANCH PARKWAY AT EL CHIMISAL ROAD/TEHACHAPI PASS, PROJECT NO. PW15-09, Insurance Forms, this Contract, and all modifications and amendments thereto, the State of California Standard Plans and Specifications, (latest edition), issued by the California Department of Transportation, where specifically referenced in the Plans, Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications, and the latest version of the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, including all supplements as written and promulgated by Public Works Standards, Inc. (hereinafter, "Standard Specifications") as amended by the General Specifications, Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications for TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION — REDHAWK PARKWAY/VAIL RANCH PARKWAY AT EL CHIMISAL ROAD/TEHACHAPI PASS, PROJECT NO. PW15-09. Copies of these Standard Specifications are available from the publisher: BNi Building News Division of BNi Publications, Inc. 990 Park Center Drive, Suite E Vista, CA 92081 (760) 734-1113 The Standard Specifications will control the general provisions, construction materials, and construction methods for this Contract except as amended by the General Specifications, Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications for TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION — REDHAWK PARKWAY/VAIL RANCH PARKWAY AT EL CHIMISAL ROAD/TEHACHAPI PASS, PROJECT NO. PW15-09. In case of conflict between the Standard Specifications and the other Contract Documents, the other Contract Documents shall take precedence over, and be used in lieu of, such conflicting portions. Where the Contract Documents describe portions of the work in general terms, but not in complete detail, it is understood that the item is to be furnished and installed completed CONTRACT C-1 and in place and that only the best general practice is to be used. Unless otherwise specified, the Contractor shall furnish all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and incidentals, and do all the work involved in executing the Contract. The Contract Documents are complementary, and what is called for by anyone shall be as binding as if called for by all. Any conflict between this Contract and any other Contract Document shall be resolved in favor of this Contract. 2. SCOPE OF WORK Contractor shall perform everything required to be performed, shall provide and furnish all the labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable equipment, and all utility and transportation services required for the following: TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION — REDHAWK PARKWAY/VAIL RANCH PARKWAY AT EL CHIMISAL ROAD/TEHACHAPI PASS, PROJECT NO. PW15-09 All of said work to be performed and materials to be furnished shall be in strict accordance with the Drawings and Specifications and the provisions of the Contract Documents hereinabove enumerated and adopted by City. 3. CITY APPROVAL All labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services shall be furnished and work performed and completed under the direction and supervision, and subject to the approval of City or its authorized representatives. 4. CONTRACT AMOUNT AND SCHEDULE The City agrees to pay, and Contractor agrees to accept, in full payment for, the work agreed to be done, the sum of: TWO HUNDRED NINETY NINE THOUSAND NINETY NINE DOLLARS ($299,099), the total amount of the base bid. Contractor agrees to complete the work in a period not to exceed 40 working days, commencing with delivery of a Notice to Proceed by City. Construction shall not commence until bonds and insurance are approved by City. 5. CHANGE ORDERS All change orders shall be approved by the City Council, except that the City Manager is hereby authorized by the City Council to make, by written order, changes or additions to the work in an amount not to exceed the contingency as established by the City Council. 6. PAYMENTS a. Lump Sum Bid Schedule: Before submittal of the first payment request, the Contractor shall submit to the Director of Public Works a schedule of values allocated to the various portions of the work, prepared in such form and supported by such data to substantiate its accuracy as the Director of Public Works may require. This schedule, as approved by the Director of Public Works, shall be used as the basis for reviewing the Contractor's payment requests. b. Unit Price Bid Schedule: Pursuant to Section 20104.50 of the Public Contract Code, within thirty (30) days after submission of a payment request to the City, the Contractor shall be paid a sum equal to 95% of the value of the work completed according to the bid schedule. Payment request forms shall be CONTRACT C-2 submitted on or about the thirtieth (30th) day of each successive month as the work progresses. The final payment, if unencumbered, or any part thereof unencumbered, shall be made sixty (60) days after acceptance of final payment and the Contractor filing a one-year Warranty and an Affidavit of Final Release with the City on forms provided by the City. c. Payment for Work Performed: Payments shall be made on demands drawn in the manner required by law, accompanied by a certificate signed by the City Manager, stating that the work for which payment is demanded has been performed in accordance with the terms of the Contract, and that the amount stated in the certificate is due under the terms of the Contract. Partial payments on the Contract price shall not be considered as an acceptance of any part of the work. d. Payment of Interest: Interest shall be paid on all undisputed payment requests not paid within thirty (30) days pursuant to Public Contract Code Section 20104.50. Public Contract Code Section 7107 is hereby incorporated by reference. 7. LIQUIDATED DAMAGES / EXTENSION OF TIME a. Liquidated Damages: In accordance with Government Code Section 53069.85, Contractor agrees to forfeit and pay to City the sum of $1,000 per day for each calendar day completion is delayed beyond the time allowed pursuant to Paragraph 4 of this Contract. Such sum shall be deducted from any payments due to or to become due to Contractor. b. Extension of Time: Contractor will be granted an extension of time and will not be assessed liquidated damages for unforeseeable delays beyond the control of, and without the fault or negligence of the Contractor, including delays caused by City. Within ten (10) calendar days of the occurrence of such delay, Contractor shall give written notice to City. Within thirty (30) calendar days of the occurrence of the delay, Contractor shall provide written documentation sufficient to support its delay claim to City. Contractor's failure to provide such notice and documentation shall constitute Contractor's waiver, discharge, and release of such delay claims against City. 8. WAIVER OF CLAIMS On or before making each request for payment under Paragraph 6 above, Contractor shall submit to City, in writing, all claims for compensation as to work related to the payment. Unless the Contractor has disputed the amount of the payment, the acceptance by Contractor of each payment shall constitute a release of all claims against the City related to the payment. Contractor shall be required to execute an affidavit, release, and indemnity agreement with each claim for payment. 9. PREVAILING WAGES Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Contract from the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations. Copies may be obtained from the California Department of Industrial Relations Internet website at http://www.dir.ca.gov. Contractor shall provide a CONTRACT C-3 copy of prevailing wage rates to any staff or subcontractor hired, and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum. Contractor shall comply with the provisions of Sections 1720, 1720.9, 1725.5, 1771.1(a), 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code. Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, Contractor shall forfeit to the City, as a penalty, the sum of $200.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid Tess than the stipulated prevailing rates for any work done under this Contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of the Contract. This project, work, or service will be subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) pursuant to Labor Code Section 1771.4. 10. TIME OF THE ESSENCE Time is of the essence in this contract. 11. INDEMNIFICATION All work covered by this Contract done at the site of construction or in preparing or delivering materials to the site shall be at the risk of Contractor alone. Contractor agrees to save, indemnify, hold harmless and defend the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, its officers, employees, and agents, against any and all liability, injuries, or death of persons (Contractor's employees included), and damage to property, arising directly or indirectly out of the obligations herein undertaken or out of the operations conducted by Contractor, save and except claims or litigations arising through the sole active negligence or sole willful misconduct of the City. The Contractor shall indemnify and be responsible for reimbursing the City for any and all costs incurred by the City as a result of Stop Notices filed against the project. The City shall deduct such costs from progress payments or final payments due to the Contractor. 12. GRATUITIES Contractor warrants that neither it nor any of its employees, agents, or representatives has offered or given any gratuities or promises to City's employees, agents, or representatives with a view toward securing this Contract or securing favorable treatment with respect thereto. 13. CONFLICT OF INTEREST Contractor warrants that none of its partners, members or shareholders are related by blood or marriage to any employee of the City who has participated in the development of the Specifications or approval of this project or who will administer this project nor are they in any way financially associated with any City officer or employee, or any architect, engineer, or other preparers of the Drawings and Specifications for this project. Contractor further warrants that no person in its employ nor any person with an ownership interest in the Contractor has been employed by the City within one year of the date of the Notice Inviting Bids. 14. CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT After the completion of the work contemplated by this Contract, Contractor shall file with the City Manager, its affidavit stating that all workmen and persons employed, all firms supplying materials, and all subcontractors upon the Project have been paid in full, and CONTRACT C-4 that there are no claims outstanding against the Project for either labor or materials, except certain items, if any, to be set forth in an affidavit covering disputed claims or items in connection with a Stop Notice which has been filed under the provisions of the laws of the State of California. 15. NOTICE TO CITY OF LABOR DISPUTES Whenever the Contractor has knowledge that any actual or potential labor dispute is delaying or threatens to delay the timely performance of the Contract, Contractor shall immediately give notice thereof, including all relevant information with respect thereto, to City. 16. BOOKS AND RECORDS Contractor's books, records, and plans or such part thereof as may be engaged in the performance of this Contract, shall at all reasonable times be subject to inspection and audit by any authorized representative of the City. 17. INSPECTION The work shall be subject to inspection and testing by City and its authorized representatives during manufacture and construction and all other times and places, including without limitation, the plants of Contractor and any of its suppliers. Contractor shall provide all reasonable facilities and assistance for the safety and convenience of inspectors. All inspections and tests shall be performed in such manner as to not unduly delay the work. The work shall be subject to final inspection and acceptance notwithstanding any payments or other prior inspections. Such final inspection shall be made within a reasonable time after completion of the work. 18. DISCRIMINATION Contractor represents that it has not, and agrees that it will not, discriminate in its employment practices on the basis of race, creed, religion, national origin, color, sex, age, or handicap. 19. GOVERNING LAW The City and Contractor understand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this Contract and also govern the interpretation of this Contract. 20. PROHIBITED INTEREST No member, officer, or employee of the City of Temecula or of a local public body who has participated in the development of the Specifications or approval of this project or will administer this project shall have any interest, direct or indirect, in the Contract or the proceeds thereof during his/her tenure or for one year thereafter. Furthermore, the Contractor covenants and agrees to their knowledge that no board member, officer or employee of the City of Temecula has any interest, whether contractual, non -contractual, financial or otherwise, in this transaction, or in the business of the contracting party other than the City of Temecula, and that if any such interest comes to the knowledge of either party at any time, a full and complete disclosure of all such information will be made, in writing, to the other party or parties, even if such interest would not be considered a conflict of interest under Article 4 (commencing with CONTRACT C-5 Section 1090) or Article 4.6 (commencing with Section 1220) of Division 4 of Title I of the Government Code of the State of California. 21. ADA REQUIREMENTS. By signing this Contract, Contractor certifies that the Contractor is in total compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Public Law 101-336, as amended. 22. WRITTEN NOTICE. Any written notice required to be given in any part of the Contract Documents shall be performed by depositing the same in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid, directed to the address of the Contractor as set forth in the Contract Documents, and to the City addressed as follows: Mailing and Delivery Address: Patrick A. Thomas, PE Director of Public Works / City Engineer City of Temecula 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 23. CLAIM DISPUTE RESOLUTION. In the event of any dispute or controversy with the City over any matter whatsoever, the Contractor shall not cause any delay or cessation in or of work, but shall proceed with the performance of the work in dispute. The Contractor shall retain any and all rights provided that pertain to the resolution of disputes and protests between the parties. The disputed work will be categorized as an "unresolved dispute" and payment, if any, shall be as later determined by mutual agreement or a court of law. The Contractor shall keep accurate, detailed records of all disputed work, claims and other disputed matters. All claims arising out of or related to the Contract or this project, and the consideration and payment of such claims, are subject to the Government Claims Act (Government Code Section 810 et seq.) with regard to filing claims. All such claims are also subject to Public Contract Code Section 9204 and Public Contract Code Section 20104 et seq. (Article 1.5), where applicable. This Contract hereby incorporates those provisions as though fully set forth herein. Thus, the Contractor or any Subcontractor must file a claim in accordance with the Government Claims Act as a prerequisite to filing a construction claim in compliance with Section 9204 and Article 1.5 (if applicable), and must then adhere to Article 1.5 and Section 9204, as applicable, pursuant to the definition of "claim" as individually defined therein. CONTRACT C-6 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Contract to be executed on the date first above written. DATED: CONTRACTOR: PTM General Engineering Services, Inc. 5942 Acorn St. Riverside, CA (951) 710-1000 elizabeth@ptm-eng.com By: Print or type NAME Print or type TITLE By: Print or type NAME Print or type TITLE (Signatures of two corporate officers required for Corporations) DATED: CITY OF TEMECULA By: Matt Rahn, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney CONTRACT C-7 L Capital Improvement Program Fiscal Years 2018-22 TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION - CITYWIDE Circulation Project Signal Location Cost to Complete Year Funding Source Winchester Road at Roripaugh Road Signal Modification(3) $ 75,000 2016-17 DIF(Traffic) Vail Ranch Parkway at Tehachapi Pass/EI Chimisal Road(1) $ 250,000 2016-17 Developer Contributions $ 45,000 2016-17 DIF(Traffic) Meadows Parkway at Pauba Road(2) $ 379,968 2017-18 DIF(Traffic) Meadows Parkway at Leena Way(2) $ 242,000 2017-18 DIF(Traffic) De Portola Road at Campanula Way (East)(2) Rancho Califonia Road at Temecula Ridge(2) $ 260,000 2018-19 DIF(Traffic) $ 280,000 2018-19 DIF(Traffic) Meadows Parkway at Campanula Way (West)(2) $ 280,000 2019-20 DIF(Traffic) Rancho California Road at Tee Drive $ 295,000 2019-20 Measure S Rancho California Road at Promenade Chardonnay $ 55,000 2019-20 Measure S Rancho California Road at Promenade Chardonnay $ 240,000 2019-20 Unspecified Ynez Road at Waverly Lane $ 300,000 2020-21 Measure S Butterfield Stage Road at Rancho Vista Road $ 295,000 2021-22 Measure S Rancho Vista Road at Avenida de la Reina $ 105,000 2021-22 Measure S Rancho Vista Road at Avenida de la Reina $ 175,000 2021-22 Unspecified Ynez Road at Rancho Way $ 280,000 2021-22 Unspecified $ 3,556,968 (1) Developer Contributions is $250,000 (2) DIF Traffic Developer Reimbursement (3) Amount included in Carry over to be completed by June 2017. Fiscal Year 2016-17 $ 370,000 Fiscal Year 2017-18 $ 621,968 Fiscal Year 2018-19 $ 540,000 Fiscal Year 2019-20 $ 870,000 Fiscal Year 2020-21 $ 300,000 Fiscal Year 2021-22 $ 855,000 TOTAL: $ 3,556,968 74 1 $ 4,000 1 $ 8,000 1 $ 4,000 1 $ 8,000 1 Capital Improvement Program Fiscal Years 2018-22 TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION - CITYWIDE Circulation Project Project Description: This project includes the design, construction, installation and modification of traffic signals at various locations throughout the City including: Rancho California Road, Ynez Road, Butterfield Stage Road, Meadows Parkway, Rancho Vista Road and Redhawk Parkway/Vail Ranch Parkway. The project also includes reimbursement for developer installed traffic signals. Benefit / Core Value: This project improves traffic safety and circulation throughout the City. In addition, this project satisfies the City's Core Values of a Healthy and Livable City, A Safe and Prepared Community, and Transportation Mobility and Connectivity. Project Status: A priority list of traffic signals has been developed. The traffic signals scheduled for installation will be designed and constructed in the scheduled fiscal year. Reimbursements for developer installed traffic signals will be made as Development Impact Fee (DIF) traffic become available. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.165.682 Level: I Project Cost: Prior Years FYE 2017 2017-18 Actual Carryover Adopted 2018-19 Expenditures Budget Appropriation Projected 2019-20 Projected 2021-22 2020-21 Projected and Total Project Projected Future Years Cost Administration $ 68,168 $ 45,000 $ 30,000 $540,000 $ 280,000 $ 225,780 $ 143,168 Construction $ 85,800 $ 400,532 $ 349,468 $540,000 $ 870,000 $350,000 $ 805,000 $ 3,400,800 Design/Environmental $ 13,000 $ 250,000 $ 13,000 Totals $ 166,968 $ 445,532 $ 379,468 $540,000 $ 870,000 $350,000 $ 805,000 $3,556,968 Prior Years FYE 2017 2017-18 Source of Funds: Actual Carryover Adopted 2018-19 Expenditures Budget Appropriation Projected 2019-20 Projected 2020-21 Projected 2021-22 Total Project Projected Cost DIF (Traffic Signals) $ 166,968 $ 195,532 $ 379,468 $540,000 $ 280,000 $ 225,780 $ 1,787,748 Developer Contributions $ 250,000 $ 250,000 Measure S $ 350,000 $350,000 $ 350,000 $ 1,050,000 Unspecified* $ 240,000 $ 229,220 $ 469,220 Total Funding: $ 166,968 $ 445,532 $ 379,468 $ 540,000 $ 870,000 $350,000 $ 805,000 $ 3,556,968 Future Operation & Maintenance Costs: 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 'Project cannot be constructed until a funding source is identified 75 TI1ECIT1qp TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION - REDHAWK PARKWAY/VAIL TEMECULA RANCH PARKWAY AT EL CHIMISAL ROAD/TEHACHAPI PASS IY TNRNr. 682.3 9 341.14 682.3 Feet WGS_1984_W eb_Mercator_Auxiliary_Sphere © Latitude Geographics Group Ltd. This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate, current, or otherwise reliable. THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION Legend LI Parcels Highways HWY ▪ INTERCHANGE ▪ INTERSTATE OFFRAMP mu ONRAMP ▪ USHWY Street Names City of Temecula Boundary Notes Item No. 10 Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance City Manager Jk o CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Patrick A. Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: March 27, 2018 SUBJECT: Adopt a Resolution and a Mitigated Negative Declaration, Approve the Plans and Specifications, and Authorize Solicitation of Construction Bids for Pechanga Parkway Widening, PW15-14 PREPARED BY: Avlin R. Odviar, Senior Civil Engineer William Becerra, Associate Engineer II RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 18- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE PECHANGA PARKWAY WIDENING PROJECT (PW15-14) AND APPROVING THE PROJECT 2. Approve the Plans and Specifications, and Authorize the Department of Public Works to Solicit Construction Bids for the Pechanga Parkway Widening, PW15-14; BACKGROUND: On November 17, 2015, the City Council approved an Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) between the City and the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians (Pechanga Tribe) in connection with the Pechanga Resort and Hotel Expansion Project (Hotel Project). The IGA includes the terms of implementing mitigation measures to address off - reservation impacts resulting from the Hotel Project. Traffic impacts and mitigation measures are described in the Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) included in draft Tribal Environmental Impact Report (TEIR) prepared for the Hotel Project. The Pechanga Parkway Widening project, PW15-14 (Project) is one of the mitigation measures identified. The Project consists of widening Pechanga Parkway, from Via Gilberto to North Casino Drive, to provide a Principal Arterial Road with six traffic lanes. These improvements will include the widening of the existing roadway and the construction and/or relocation of support structures, storm drain, sewer & water utilities, curb & gutter, and other related items. This project satisfies the City's Core Values of Transportation Mobility and Connectivity. Staff contracted with Michael Baker International to complete an Initial Study (IS), which included an Air Quality Analysis, Habitat Assessment and MSHCP Consistency Analysis, and Cultural Resources Assessment, Geotechnical Investigation, Water Quality Management Plan, and Noise Analysis. The IS identified no impact or less than significant impact for the following environmental areas of concern: • Agriculture and Forestry Resources • Air Quality • Greenhouse Gas Emissions • Hazards & Hazardous Materials • Land Use and Planning • Mineral Resources • Population & Housing • Public Services • Recreation • Traffic and Transportation • Utilities and Service Systems The IS identified the following areas of concern as less than significant impact with mitigation incorporated: • Aesthetics • Biological Resources • Cultural Resources • Geology and Soils • Hydrology and Water Quality • Noise • Tribal Cultural Resources Under CEQA guidelines, a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for the project is required with mitigation measures identified for the potential impacts to a level of insignificance. Staff recommends that the City Council adopt an MND for this project. A list of the proposed mitigation measures are included within the attached Final MND. The Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration public review comment period commenced on May 19, 2017 and concluded on June 19, 2017. Notices were mailed to surrounding property owners, signs were placed on the project site, and a notice was placed in the local newspaper. The City of Temecula received three written comments and responded to each comment in the in the attached Final MND which includes all timely received written comments and Reponses thereto. The Final MND was provided to commenting agencies in compliance with State Law. Any subsequent public comments may be presented to the City Council for consideration. Project plans and specifications are complete and the project is ready to be advertised for construction bids. The contract documents are available for review in the office of the Director of Public Works. The Engineer's Estimate is $2,480,000 and the number of allowable working days is one hundred twenty, which is six months. FISCAL IMPACT: This project is identified in the City's Capital Improvement Program, Fiscal Years 2018-22. The source of funding is Pechanga Tribe Contributions in accordance with the Intergovernmental Agreement dated November 17, 2015. There are sufficient funds in the project account to cover the estimated cost of construction. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution 2 Initial Study/MND 3 Project Description 4 Project Location Map RESOLUTION NO. 18- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE PECHANGA PARKWAY WIDENING PROJECT (PW15-14) AND APPROVING THE PROJECT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On November 17, 2015, the City Council approved an Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) between the City and the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians (Pechanga Tribe) in connection with the Pechanga Resort and Hotel Expansion Project (Hotel Project). The IGA includes the terms of implementing mitigation measures to address off -reservation impacts resulting from the Hotel Project. Traffic impacts and mitigation measures are described in the Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) included in draft Tribal Environmental Impact Report (TEIR). B. The TIA and TEIR identify a need to widen Pechanga Parkway to three lanes in each direction, between Via Gilberto and North Casino Drive (Project). C. Per the terms of the IGA, the Pechanga Tribe agrees to fund the Project and the City agrees to perform the work. D. Pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the approval of the Project. Based upon the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that there was no substantial evidence that the Project could have a significant effect on the environment and a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. E. The Project was processed including, but not limited to all public notices, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law, including the California Environmental Quality Act, Public Resources Code 21000, et seq. and the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, 14. Cal. Code Regs 15000 et seq. (collectively referred to as "CEQA"). F. Pursuant to CEQA, the City is the lead agency for the Project because it is the public agency with the authority and principal responsibility for approving the Project. G. On March 27, 2018, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, the City Council considered the Project and any comments received prior to or at the public hearing on March 27, 2018, at which time the City staff presented its report, and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to the Project and the Mitigated Negative Declaration. H. Three written communications were received prior to the March 27, 2018 public meeting on the Project and a response to all of the comments made therein was prepared, submitted to the City Council and incorporated into the administrative record of the proceedings. One of the correspondences was a letter received from the State Clearinghouse and Planning Unit of the Governor's Office of Planning and Research documenting the City's circulation of the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration to various State agencies for review as required by CEQA. The City Council reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and considered all testimony and comments received regarding the Project and the Mitigated Negative Declaration prior to and at the March 27, 2018 public hearing, and based on substantial evidence in the whole record before it finds that: (1) The Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; (2) There is no substantial evidence that the Project will have a significant effect on the environment; and (3) The Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the City Council. Section 2. Based on the findings set forth in this Resolution, the City Council hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the Project. The Director of Public Works is authorized and directed to file a Notice of Determination in accordance with CEQA. Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. The City Council hereby approves the Project for the Pechanga Parkway Widening Project (PW15-14) and authorizes the Director of Public Works to proceed with the preparation of Plans and Specifications for this Project. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 27th of day March, 2018. Matt Rahn, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 18- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 27th day March, 2018, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl, City Clerk RESPONSE TO COMMENTS Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) Pechanga Parkway Widening Project LEAD AGENCY: City of Temecula 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 Contact: William Becerra Associate Engineer (951) 506-5142 PREPARED BY: Michael Baker International 40810 County Center Drive, Suite 200 Temecula, California 92591 Contact: Mr. Darren Edgington, CEP -IT, LEED AP (951) 506-2083 JN 145559 July, 2017 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening Project Final IS/MND PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK July, 2017 2 Response to Comments City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening Project Final IS/MND COMMENT LETTER NO. 1 Destiny Colocho on behalf of Rincon Band of Luiseno Indians, dated May 23, 2017 Response 1.1 The comment is an introduction to the letter. The commenter thanks the City for the consultation notification and states that the project location is within the Territory of the Luiseho people. No further response is necessary. Response 1.2 The commenter defers review of the project to the Pechanga Band of Luiseho Indians and Soboba Band of Luiseho Indians who are located closer to the project area. The City of Temecula conducted consultation with the relevant Native American tribes, pursuant to the requirements of AB 52, including both the Soboba and Pechanga Bands of Luiseho Indians. No further response is necessary. Response 1.3 The City of Temecula appreciates and values your participation during the public review process. No further response is necessary. July, 2017 3 Response to Comments City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening Project Final IS/MND PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK July, 2017 4 Response to Comments City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening Project Final IS/MND Comment Letter No. 2 Scott Morgan on behalf of Governor's Office of Planning and Research, dated June 20, 2017 Response 2.1 The comment acknowledges that the City of Temecula has complied with the State Clearinghouse review requirements for draft environmental documents, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. No further response is necessary Response 2.2 This comment from the State Clearinghouse provides contact information regarding questions on the environmental review process. No further response is necessary. July, 2017 5 Response to Comments City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening Project Final IS/MND PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK July, 2017 6 Response to Comments City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening Project Final IS/MND Comment Letter No. 3 Mark Roberts on behalf of Department of Transportation, dated June 7, 2017 Response 3.1 The comment is an introduction to the letter and provides general project background information. No response is required. Response 3.2 The commenter provides general background regarding the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) jurisdiction and responsibilities. The City of Temecula acknowledges this comment. No further response is necessary Response 3.3 The commenter states that the California Department of Transportation has no comments on the proposed project, and that it appears there will be no significant impacts to the State Highway System. The commenter states that the California Department of Transportation does reserve the right to comment on any future revisions to this project. The City of Temecula acknowledges this comment. No further response is necessary. Response 3.4 The commenter provides contact information should the project be revised so that Caltrans can provide updated recommendations for impact mitigation. The City of Temecula appreciates and values your participation during the public review process. No further response is necessary. July, 2017 7 Response to Comments RINCON BAND OF LUISENO INDIANS Cultural Resources Department 1 W. Tribal Road • Valley Center, California 92082 (760) 297-2635 Fax:(760) 692-1498 May 23, 2017 Luke Watson City of Temecula Community Development Planning Division 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 Re: Pechanga Parkway Widening Project Dear Mr. Watson: COMMENT LETTER 1 This letter is written on behalf of Rincon Band of Luiseno Indians. We have received your notification regarding the Pechanga Parkway Widening Project and we thank you for the consultation notification. 1.1 The location you have identified is within the Territory of the Luiseno people. Embedded in the Luiseno Territory are Rincon's history, culture and identity. The project is within the Luiseno Aboriginal Territory of the Luiseno people however, it is not within Rincon's Historic Boundaries. We do not have any additional information regarding this project but, we defer this project to the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians or Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians who are located closer to your project area. Thank you for the opportunity to protect and preserve our cultural assets. Destiny Colocho Manager Rincon Cultural Resources Department 1.2 11.3 Bo Mazzetti Tribal Chairman Tishmall Turner Vice Chairwoman Steve Stallings Laurie E. Gonzalez Council Member Council Member Alfonso Kolb Council Member Edmund G. Brown Jr. Governor June 20, 2017 COMMENT LETTER 2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA Governor's Office of Planning and Research State Clearinghouse and Planning Unit William Becerra City of Temecula 41000 Main St Temecula. CA 92590 Subject: Pechanga Parkway Widening Project SCH#: 2017051059 Dear William Becerra: a * 9n ; •�• �,4.OF CMOs Ken Alex Director The State Clearinghouse submitted the above named Mitigated Negative Declaration to selected state agencies for review. The review period closed on June 19, 2017, and no state agencies submitted comments by that date. This letter acknowledges that you have complied with the State Clearinghouse 2.1 review requirements for draft environmental documents, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. Please call the State Clearinghouse at (916) 445-06I3 if you have any questions regarding the environmental review process. If you have a question about the above-named project, please refer to the ten -digit State Clearinghouse number when contacting this office. Sincerehr / Scott Morgan Director, State Clearinghouse 1400 TENTH STREET P.O. BOX 3044 SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95812-3044 TEL (916) 445-0613 FAX (916) 323-3018 www.opr.ca.gov 2.2 Document Details Report State Clearinghouse Data Base SCH# 2017051059 Project Title Pechanga Parkway Widening Project Lead Agency Temecula, City of Type MND Mitigated Negative Declaration Description The project proposes widening of Pechanga Parkway from four lanes to six lanes. The widening would occur along a segment of the existing roadway, spanning approx 3,500 ft, extending from approx 320 ft north of Via Gilberto to approx 320 ft south of North Casino Dr. The existing roadway includes four travel lanes in each direction, a landscaped center median, and left-hand tum lanes for access to Via EduardoNVolf Valley Rd, Casino Dr, and Pechanga Resort Dr. The existing roadway also includes a sidewalk throughout the project area, as well as bike lanes in both directions, with exception of along the southbound lanes along the frontage of the Pechanga Resort & Casino. The project also includes addition of new center median curb and landscaping; installation of a fiber optics cable; and, re -location of streetlights/traffic signals. The project also includes curb/gutter, sound wall, sidewalk, landscaping, irrigation, and storm drain improvements. The proposed roadway widening would expand the Pechanga Parkway Phase 11 improvements that occurred in 2009. The project is aimed at expanding existing improvements to alleviate traffic along Pechanga Parkway and to further the long-term transportation needs identified by the city's general plan. Lead Agency Contact Name William Becerra Agency City of Temecula Phone (951) 693-3963 email Address 41000 Main St City Temecula Fax State CA Zip 92590 Project Location County Riverside City Temecula Region Lat/Long 33° 27' 34.76" N / 117° 06' 28.00" W Cross Streets Via Gilberto/North Casino Dr Parcel No. Township Range Section Base Proximity to: Highways SR 79, 1-15 Airports Railways Waterways Temecula Creek; Wolf Creek Channel Schools Land Use Roadway ROW Project Issues Aesthetic/Visual; Agricultural Land; Air Quality; Archaeologic -Historic; Biological Resources; Cumulative Effects; Flood Plain/Flooding; Forest Land/Fire Hazard; Geologic/Seismic; Growth Inducing; Landuse; Minerals; Noise; Population/Housing Balance; Public Services; Recreation/Parks; Schools/Universities; Septic System; Sewer Capacity; Soil Erosion/Compaction/Grading; Solid Waste; Toxic/Hazardous; Traffic/Circulation; Vegetation; Water Quality; Water Supply; Wetland/Riparian; Wildlife Reviewing Agencies Resources Agency; Department of Fish and Wildlife, Region 6; Department of Parks and Recreation; Department of Water Resources; California Highway Patrol; Caltrans, District 8; Native American Heritage Commission; Regional Water Quality Control Board, Region 7; State Water Resources Control Board, Division of Drinking Water; Air Resources Board, Transportation Projects Note: Blanks in data fields result from insufficient information provided by lead agency. Document Details Report State Clearinghouse Data Base Date Received 05/19/2017 Start of Review 05/19/2017 End of Review 06/19/2017 Note: Blanks in data fields result from insufficient information provided by lead agency. ,}TATE OF CALIFORNIA—CALIFORNIA STATE TRANSPORTATION AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 8 PLANNING 464 WEST FOURTH STREET, 6th FLOOR, MS 725 SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92401-1400 PHONE (909) 383-4147 FAX (909) 383-5936 TTY 711 www.dot.ca.gov/dist8 June 7, 2017 William Becerra City of Temecula Planning Department 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 EDMUND G. BROWN Jr _ GovemoE Algatik COMMENT LETTER 3 Making Conservation a California way ofLife. RIV 15 PM 3.38 Subject: Pechanga Parkway Widening Project — Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Dear Mr. Becerra The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) has completed the review of Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the Pechanga Parkway Widening Project. The objective of the proposed project is to widen Pechanga Parkway from a four lane (110 feet width) facility to six lanes (134 feet width) generally between Via Gilberto and North Casino Drive in order to accommodate existing and predicted traffic demands and uphold the City of Temecula's goals to reduce traffic congestion, improve safety on roadways, and provide better access to regional transportation routes. 3.1 As the owner and operator of the State Highway System (SHS), it is our responsibility to coordinate and consult with local jurisdictions when proposed development may impact our facilities. Under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), we are required to make recommendations to offset associated impacts with the proposed project. Although the project is under the jurisdiction of the City of Temecula, it is also 3.2 subject to the policies and regulations that govern the SHS due to the project's potential impact to State facilities. We have no comments as it appears there will be no significant impacts to the SHS; however, Caltrans T 3.3 reserves the right to comment on any future revisions to this project. 1 We appreciate the opportunity to offer comments concerning this project. If this proposal is revised in any way, please forward the appropriate information to this Office so that updated recommendations for impact 3.4 mitigation may be provided. If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact Kwasi Agyakwa at (909) 806-3955 or myself at (909) 383-4557 for assistance. Sincerely, MARK ROBERTS Office Chief Intergovernmental Review, Community and Regional Planning "Provide a safe, sustainable, integrated and efficient transportation system to enhance California's economy and livability" Pechanga Parkway Widening Project MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM PROJECT NAME: Pechanga Parkway Widening Project PROJECT MANAGER: William Becerra, Associate Engineer, City of Temecula PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project addressed in this IS/MND consists of all actions related to the widening of Pechanga Parkway from four to six lanes generally between Via Gilberto and North Casino Drive. PROJECT LOCATION: INTRODUCTION: The proposed project is generally located in Temecula and involves segments of Pechanga Parkway from approximately 320 feet north of Via Gilberto to approximately 320 feet south of North Casino Drive. This document is the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) for the Pechanga Parkway Widening Project. An MMRP is required for the proposed Project because the IS/MND has identified significant adverse impacts, and measures have been identified to mitigate those impacts. This MMRP has been prepared pursuant to Section 21081.6 of the California Public Resources Code, which requires public agencies to "adopt a reporting and monitoring program for the changes made to the project or conditions of project approval, adopted in order to mitigate or avoid significant effects on the environment." As the lead agency, the City of Temecula will be responsible for monitoring compliance with all mitigation measures. Different City departments are responsible for various aspects of the Project. The MMRP identifies the department with the responsibility for ensuring the measure is completed; however, it is expected that one or more departments will coordinate efforts to ensure compliance. The MMRP is presented in tabular form on the following pages. The components of the MMRP are described briefly below. • Source and Mitigation Measure: The mitigation measures are taken from the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND), in the same order they appear in the IS/MND. • Timing: Identifies at which stage of the Project the mitigation must be completed. • Monitoring Responsibility: Identifies the department in the City with responsibility for mitigation monitoring. • Date Completed and Signature: Provides a contact who reviewed the mitigation measure and the date the measure was determined complete. Wage JULY Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Matrix City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening Project SOURCE MITIGATION MEASURE TIMING MONITORING DATE COMPLETED SIGNATURE AESTHETICS Draft IS/MND Section 4.1- Aesthetics Aesthetics Mitigation Measure 1 (AES -11 Prior to Construction City of Temecula Public Works Department Prior to construction, the City shall define the temporary construction equipment staging areas to be used within the project site. Materials, heavy-duty equipment, and debris piles shall be clustered in order to minimize visual impacts during construction. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Draft IS/MND Section 3.4 -Commencement Biological Resources Biological Resources Mitigation Measure 1(BIO-11 Within 30 days prior to of any 1 Ground -Disturbing Activities City of Temecula Community Development / Public Works Department P Within 30 days prior to commencement of any ground -disturbing activities (e.g., clearing, grubbing, demolition, earthmoving, construction), burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia) surveys shall be conducted by a qualified biologist per the Burrowing Owl Survey Protocol and Mitigation Guidelines (California Burrowing Owl Consortium 1997) and the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (California Department of Fish and Wildlife [CDFW]; March 7, 2012), as follows: • During the burrowing owl (BUOW) breeding season (February 1 through August 31), protocol surveys for active nest burrows shall be performed within potentially suitable habitat (as determined by the biologist) inside and up to 500 feet from the demarcated disturbance limits. A non- disturbance buffer of 250 feet shall be delineated by the biologist around active nests, in consultation with CDFW, and no disturbance activities shall occur within the buffer(s) until the BUOW breeding season is over. • During the non -breeding season for BUOW (September 1 through January 31), protocol surveys for resident BUOWs shall be performed within potentially suitable habitat (as determined by the biologist) inside and up to 500 feet from the demarcated disturbance limits. A passive relocation program may be implemented for observed BUOWs using occupied burrows pursuant to CDFW approval. The relocation of resident BUOWs shall be according to a relocation plan prepared by the biologist in consultation with and approved by CDFW. This plan shall provide for BUOW 2 SOURCE MITIGATION MEASURE TIMING MONITORING DATE COMPLETED SIGNATURE relocations to nearby suitable conserved lands possessing available nesting habitat and appropriate development -free buffers that are protected in perpetuity via conservation easements or other land preservation mechanisms. • The pedestrian protocol surveys shall include two early morning surveys between one hour before and two hours after sunrise, and two evening surveys between two hours before and one hour after sunset, via transects spaced to allow 100%visual coverage of the ground surface. The distance between transect center lines shall average approximately 100 feet, and may be reduced in places to account for differences in terrain, vegetation density, and ground surface visibility. Draft IS/MND Section 3.4- Biological Resources Biological Resources Mitigation Measure 2 (BIO -2} Prior to/During Construction City of Temecula Public Works Department 1. Within seven days prior to commencement of grading/construction activities, a qualified biologist shall perform a pre -construction survey within 500 feet from the proposed work limits. 2. If active avian nest(s) are discovered within or 500 feet from the work limits, a buffer shall be delineated around the active nest(s) measuring 300 feet for passerines and 500 feet for raptors. A qualified biologist shall monitor the nest(s) weekly after commencement of grading/construction to ensure that nesting behavior is not adversely affected by such activities. 3. If the qualified biologist determines that nesting behavior is adversely affected by grading/construction activities, then a noise mitigation program shall be implemented in consultation with CDFW, to allow such activities to proceed. Once the young have fledged and left the nest(s), then grading/construction activities may proceed within 300 feet (500 feet for raptor species) of the fledged nest(s). 4. Raptor nests are protected under Section 3503.5 of the California Fish and Game Code (California Law 2011) which makes it unlawful to take, possess, or destroy any birds in the orders Falconiformes or Strigiformes; or, to take, possess, or destroy the nests or eggs of any such birds. Consultation with CDFW shall be required prior to the removal of any raptor nest(s) observed during the preconstruction clearance surveys. CULTURAL RESOURCES 3 SOURCE MITIGATION MEASURE TIMING MONITORING DATE COMPLETED SIGNATURE Draft IS/MND Section 3.5- Cultural Resources Cultural Resources Mitigation Measure 1 (CR -11 During Ground- Disturbing Activities City of Temecula Community Development / Public Works Department A professional archaeological monitor shall be present to monitor all ground -disturbing activities associated with the project. The archaeological monitor shall work under the direct supervision of a Cultural Resource Professional that meets the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualification Standards for Archaeology. Additionally, a Native American tribal representative for the Pechanga Tribe shall be invited to voluntarily monitor initial ground -disturbing activities that involve trenching for utility installation and earthmoving activities for water quality basins, initial site grading, and/or fill of imported soil onto the site. The archaeological monitor shall be authorized to divert construction equipment to investigate any areas suspected to contain cultural resources. In the event that cultural resources are discovered on the project site during project construction, all work shall be halted immediately within 50 feet of the discovery and the resources shall be evaluated by a qualified archaeologist and the most likely descendant (MLD) Tribe. Evaluations shall take place in consultation with the City of Temecula and any participating Native American entities. Any unanticipated cultural resources that are discovered shall be evaluated and a final report prepared by the qualified archaeologist. The report shall include a list of the resources discovered, documentation of each site/locality, and interpretation of the resources identified, and the method of preservation and/or recovery for identified resources. If the qualified archaeologist determines the cultural resources to be either historic resources or unique archaeological resources, avoidance and/or mitigation will be required pursuant to and consistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(c) and Public Resources Code Section 21083.2. Draft IS/MND Section 3.5- Cultural Resources Cultural Resources Mitigation Measure 2 (CR -21 During Ground- Disturbing Activities City of Temecula Community Development / Public Works Department Consistent with State CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5, Subdivision (e), in the event of an accidental discovery or recognition of any human remains, the County Coroner shall be notified and construction activities at the affected work site shall be halted. If the remains are found to be Native American, the County Coroner shall notify the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) within 24 hours. The NAHC shall immediately notify the most likely descendant(s) under Public Resources Code Section 5097.98, and the descendants must make recommendations or state their preference for treatment within 48 hours of being granted access to the site. Guidelines of the NAHC shall be adhered to in the treatment and disposition of the remains in accordance with the provisions of Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 and Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. 4Page SOURCE MITIGATION MEASURE TIMING MONITORING DATE COMPLETED SIGNATURE GEOLOGY AND SOILS Draft IS/MND Section 3.6-Commencement Geology and Soils Geology and Soils Mitigation Measure 1(GEO-1) Prior to of Grading City of Temecula Public Works Department Prior to commencement of any project grading activities, and in accordance with National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) requirements, the City of Temecula shall prepare a stormwater pollution prevention plan (SWPPP) for approval by the City's Public Works Department. The SWPPP shall include relevant best management practices (BMPs) in order to minimize soil erosion and water quality impacts during project construction. NOISE Draft IS/MND Section 3.12- Noise Prior to initiation of construction, the City of Temecula shall ensure that the following measures are incorporated into construction contract documents: • All construction equipment, fixed, or mobile, shall be equipped with properly operating and maintained mufflers and other State required noise attenuation devices. • A construction notice shall be mailed to residents within a 150-foot radius of the project and shall indicate the dates and duration of construction activities, as well as provide a contact name and a telephone number where residents can inquire about the construction process and register complaints. • All construction, maintenance, or demolition activities associated with the proposed project shall be limited to the hours between 7:00 AM and 4:00 PM Mondays — Fridays. All construction on weekends and National holidays shall be prohibited. • Construction haul routes shall be designed to avoid noise sensitive uses (e.g., residences, convalescent homes, etc.). • During construction, stationary construction equipment shall be placed such that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive noise receivers. • Construction equipment staging areas shall be located away from adjacent sensitive receptors. Prior to Construction City of Temecula Public Works Department ADMINISTRATIVE DRAFT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Pechanga Parkway Widening LEAD AGENCY: City of Temecula 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 Contact: William Becerra Associate Engineer (951) 693-3963 PREPARED BY: Michael Baker International 40810 County Center Drive, Suite 200 Temecula, CA 92591 Contact: Darren Edgington, CEP -IT, LEED AP (951) 506-2083 JN 153547 May 2017 PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 STATUTORY AUTHORITY AND REQUIREMENTS 1 1.2 PURPOSE 1 1.3 CONSULTATION 2 1.4 INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE 2 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2 2.1 PROJECT LOCATION AND SETTING 2 2.2 BACKGROUND 3 2.3 PROJECT OBJECTIVES 3 2.4 PROJECT CHARACTERISTICS 3 2.5 AGREEMENTS, PERMITS, AND APPROVALS 4 2.6 INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST 5 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 21 3.1 AESTHETICS 21 3.2 AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY RESOURCES 24 3.3 AIR QUALITY 26 3.4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES 33 3.5 CULTURAL RESOURCES 42 3.6 GEOLOGY AND SOILS 48 3.7 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS 53 3.8 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS 58 3.9 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY 62 3.10 LAND USE AND PLANNING 67 3.11 MINERAL RESOURCES 69 3.12 NOISE 71 3.13 POPULATION AND HOUSING 77 3.14 PUBLIC SERVICES 79 3.15 RECREATION 81 3.16 TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC 82 3.17 TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES 86 3.18 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS 89 3.19 MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE 92 May 2017 i Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening 4.0 REFERENCES 95 4.1 REPORT PREPARATION PERSONNEL 95 4.2 REFERENCE DOCUMENTS 96 4.3 INVENTORY OF MITIGATION MEASURES 99 5.0 CONSULTANT RECOMMENDATION 105 6.0 LEAD AGENCY DETERMINATION 107 LIST OF TABLES Table 2.5-1: Required Permit Approvals 4 Table 3.3-1: Maximum Short -Term Construction Emissions (Pounds per Day) 29 Table 3.3-2: Localized Significance Summary —Onsite Construction Emissions (Pounds per Day) 31 Table 3.7-1: Greenhouse Gas Emissions — Project Operations (Metric Tons per Year) 54 Table 3.7-2: Consistency with SCAG's Regional Transportation Plan/ Sustainable Communities Strategy Goals 56 Table 3.12-1: Maximum Noise Levels Generated by Construction Equipment 73 Table 3.12-2: Typical Construction Equipment Vibration Levels 75 LIST OF EXHIBITS Exhibit 1: Regional Location Map 9 Exhibit 2: Local Vicinity Map 11 Exhibit 3a: Site Plan 13 Exhibit 3b: Site Plan 15 Exhibit 3c: Site Plan 17 Exhibit 3d: Site Plan 19 APPENDICES Appendix A: Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas Data Appendix B: Habitat Assessment/MSHCP Consistency Analysis Appendix C: Cultural Resources Assessment & Tribal Consultation Appendix D: Geotechnical Investigation Appendix E: Water Quality Management Plan Appendix F: Noise Data Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration ii May 2017 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening 1.0 INTRODUCTION Following preliminary review of the proposed Pechanga Parkway Widening Project (proposed project), the City of Temecula (City) has determined that the project is subject to the guidelines and regulations of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). This Initial Study has been prepared to address potential impacts associated with the project, as described below. This Initial Study addresses the potential direct, indirect, and cumulative environmental effects associated with implementation of the proposed project. 1.1 STATUTORY AUTHORITY AND REQUIREMENTS In accordance with CEQA (Public Resources Code Sections 21000-21177) and pursuant to Section 15063 of the California Code of Regulations (CCR) and the City's Local CEQA Guidelines, the City, acting in the capacity of lead agency, is required to undertake the preparation of an Initial Study to determine if the proposed project would have a significant environmental impact. If the City finds that there is no evidence that the project, either as proposed or as modified to include the mitigation measures identified in this Initial Study, may cause a significant effect on the environment, the City shall find that the proposed project would not have a significant effect on the environment and shall prepare a Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project. Such a determination may be made only if "there is no substantial evidence in light of the whole record before the lead agency" that such impacts may occur (Public Resources Code Section 21080(c)). This document has been prepared to provide an environmental basis for subsequent discretionary actions for the project, to inform the City prior to taking action on the project, and to provide responsible agencies, trustee agencies, other affected agencies, and the general public with information regarding the project and its potential environmental effects. As discussed further in Section 3.1, the discretionary actions anticipated to be required for the proposed project by the City are the adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration and approval of an Encroachment Permit, City of Temecula General Plan Circulation Element Amendment, Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan, and Traffic Control Plan. It is also anticipated that the project will require approval of utility service connections. The following environmental documentation and supporting analysis is subject to a 30 -day public review period. During this review, comments on the document relative to environmental issues should be addressed to the City of Temecula. Following review of comments received, the City will consider the comments as part of the project's environmental review process. 1.2 PURPOSE The purpose of the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) is to (1) identify potential environmental impacts; (2) provide the lead agency with information to use as the basis for deciding whether to prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) or Negative Declaration (including a Mitigated Negative Declaration); (3) enable an applicant or the lead agency to modify a project, mitigating adverse impacts before an EIR is prepared; (4) facilitate environmental assessment early in the design of the project; (5) provide documentation of the factual basis for the finding in a Negative Declaration that a project would not have a significant environmental effect; (6) eliminate needless EIRs; (7) determine whether a previously prepared EIR could be used for the project; and (8) assist in the preparation of an EIR, if required, by focusing the EIR on the May 2017 1 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening effects determined to be significant, identifying the effects determined not to be significant, and explaining the reasons for determining that potentially significant effects would not be significant. As discussed further below, the City has determined that the project will not result in significant environmental impacts with the incorporated mitigation and has circulated this draft IS/MND for public review and comment. Section 15063 of the CEQA Guidelines identifies specific disclosure requirements for inclusion in an Initial Study. Pursuant to those requirements, an Initial Study shall include (1) a description of the project, including the location of the project; (2) an identification of the environmental setting; (3) an identification of the environmental effects by use of a checklist, matrix, or other method, provided that entries on a checklist or other form are briefly explained to indicate that there is some evidence to support the entries; (4) a discussion of ways to mitigate significant effects identified, if any; (5) an examination of whether the project is compatible with existing zoning, plans, and other applicable land use controls; and (6) the name of the person or persons who prepared or participated in the preparation of the Initial Study. 1.3 CONSULTATION As soon as the lead agency has determined that an Initial Study would be required for the project, the lead agency is directed to consult informally with responsible agencies and trustee agencies that are responsible for resources affected by the project, in order to obtain the recommendations of those agencies as to whether an EIR or Negative Declaration should be prepared for the project. Following receipt of any written comments from those agencies, the lead agency would consider any recommendations of those agencies in the formulation of the preliminary findings. Following preparation of this Initial Study, the City of Temecula will initiate formal consultation with these and other governmental agencies, as required under CEQA and its implementing guidelines. 1.4 INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE Pertinent documents relating to this IS/MND have been cited and incorporated, in accordance with Sections 15148 and 15150 of the CEQA Guidelines. The following references were utilized during preparation of this Initial Study and are available for review on the City and County of Riverside websites: • City of Temecula General Plan, 2005 • City of Temecula General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report, 2005 • City of Temecula Development Code • Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2.1 PROJECT LOCATION AND SETTING The proposed Pechanga Parkway Widening Project (proposed project) is located in the City of Temecula within southwestern Riverside County, California; refer to Exhibit 1, Regional Location Map. More specifically, the project is located along, and adjacent to, the existing Pechanga Parkway alignment from Via Gilberto to North Casino Drive; refer to Exhibit 2, Local Vicinity Map. Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 2 May 2017 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening The project site, which includes an approximately 3,500 -foot segment of the existing roadway, consists of improved road right-of-way (ROW), as well as pedestrian facilities and an existing flood control channel. There are a number of overhead and underground utilities, which serve the surrounding area, that are located within the existing road ROW. These utilities include a fiber optics cable, electrical, gas, storm drain, sewer, recycled and domestic water. A number of the existing aboveground utility appurtenances (street lighting and signals) will need to be relocated during the project construction process. Additionally, the flood control facilities that run parallel to Pechanga Parkway will require modification to accommodate the widened roadway. According to the City of Temecula General Plan, the parcels adjacent to the project site include Low Medium Density Residential (LM) and Specific Plan (SP) to the north, Tribal Trust Lands (TTL) and SP to the south, LM and TTL to the west, and SP to the east. According to the City of Temecula General Plan Land Use Map, the parcels adjacent to the project site are designated as LM to the north, LM and TTL to the south, LM and TTL to the west, and LM, Medium Density Residential (M), Neighborhood Commercial (NC), and Community Commercial (CC) to the east. 2.2 BACKGROUND Incorporated in 1989, the City of Temecula ("City") is located in southwestern Riverside County and is one of the fastest growing cities in California. Currently, the City is home to over 106,000 residents and spans over 37.18 square miles. According to the City of Temecula General Plan, the City was planned in a manner that would preserve and enhance high quality living while preserving the topography of the surrounding area. Temecula is known as the heart of Southern California wine country due to the expansive viticulture -related land uses in the eastern regions of the City. Pechanga Parkway functions as a primary north -south arterial for the southern portion of the City of Temecula circulation network. In response to high traffic volumes, the proposed project would continue the 2009 Pechanga Parkway Phase II Improvements that widened Pechanga Parkway to a six -lane facility from State Route 79 South (Temecula Parkway) to Via Gilberto and a four -lane facility from Via Gilberto to Wolf Valley Road. 2.3 PROJECT OBJECTIVES The objective of the proposed project is to widen Pechanga Parkway from a four lane (110 feet width) facility to six lanes (134 feet width) generally between Via Gilberto and North Casino Drive in order to accommodate existing and predicted traffic demands and uphold the City of Temecula's goals to reduce traffic congestion, improve safety on roadways, and provide better access to regional transportation routes. Due to the expansion of the Pechanga Resort & Casino and continued residential and commercial development along Pechanga Parkway, additional roadway capacity to meet existing and future needs was identified. 2.4 PROJECT CHARACTERISTICS The project proposes the widening of Pechanga Parkway from a four lane (110 feet width) facility to six lanes (134 feet width). The roadway widening would occur along a segment of the existing roadway, spanning approximately 3,500 feet. The improvements would extend from approximately 320 feet north of Via Gilberto to approximately 320 feet south of North Casino Drive; refer to Exhibit 2. Local Vicinity Map, and Exhibits 3a — 3d, Site Plan. May 2017 3 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening As the roadway exists, it includes four travel lanes in each direction, a landscaped center median, and left-hand turn lanes for access to Via Eduardo/Wolf Valley Road, Casino Drive, and Pechanga Resort Drive. The existing roadway also included sidewalk throughout the project area, as well as bike lanes in both directions, with the exception of on the southbound roadway along the frontage of the Pechanga Resort & Casino. The proposed widening would include the following modifications to the roadway: • Construction to accommodate the addition of new travel lanes; • Construction of two (2) additional travel lanes; • Addition of new center median curb and landscaping; • Installation of a fiber optics cable; • Re -location of streetlights and traffic signals. The proposed roadway widening would expand the Pechanga Parkway Phase II improvements that occurred in 2009 which widened Pechanga Parkway to a six -lane facility from State Route 79 South (Temecula Parkway) to Via Gilberto and a four -lane facility from Via Gilberto to Wolf Valley Road. The roadway widening is aimed at expanding the existing improvements to alleviate traffic along Pechanga Parkway and further the long-term transportation needs identified by the City of Temecula General Plan. Besides the widening of Pechanga Parkway from four lanes to six lanes, the project also includes curb, gutter, sound wall, sidewalk, landscaping, irrigation, and storm drain improvements. Project construction would occur over six months beginning in spring 2017. Construction activities include site mobilization; demolition; minor grading; installation of asphalt and concrete; relocation of utilities; and traffic striping. 2.5 AGREEMENTS, PERMITS, AND APPROVALS The following permits are anticipated for the proposed project: Table 2.5-1: Required Permit Approvals Agreements, Permits, and Approvals Granting Agency IS/MND Approval City of Temecula Encroachment Permit City of Temecula City of Temecula General Plan Circulation Element Amendment City of Temecula Traffic Control Plan City of Temecula Stormwater Pollution Prevent Plan City of Temecula General Construction Storm Water Permit San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 4 May 2017 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening 2.6 INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST 2.6.1 BACKGROUND 1. Project Title: Pechanga Parkway Widening Project 2. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Temecula 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 3. Contact Person and Phone Number: Stuart Fisk, Principal Planner (951) 506-5159 4. Project Location: The proposed project is generally located in Temecula and involves segments of Pechanga Parkway from approximately 320 feet north of Via Gilberto to approximately 320 feet south of North Casino Drive. 5. Lead Agency's Name and Address: City of Temecula 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 6. General Plan Designation: The project would be located in the road right-of-way. The General Plan Land Use Designations adjacent to the project site include Low Medium Density Residential (LM) to the north, LM and Tribal Trust Lands (TTL) to the south, LM and TTL to the west, and LM, Medium Density Residential (M, Neighborhood Commercial (NC), and Community Commercial (CC) to the east. 7. Zoning: The project would be located within the road right-of-way. The zoning adjacent to the project site includes LM and Specific Plan (SP) to the north, TTL and SP to the south, LM and TTL to the west, and SP to the east. 8. Description of the Project: The project addressed in this IS/MND consists of all actions related to the widening of Pechanga Parkway from four to six lanes generally between Via Gilberto and North Casino Drive. 9. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The lands surrounding the project site have the following uses: North: LM South: LM and TTL East: LM, M, NC, and CC West: LM and TTL 10. Other public agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement). San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board (General Construction Permit) May 2017 5 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening 2.6.2 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS This section analyzes the potential environmental impacts associated with the proposed project. The issue areas evaluated in this Initial Study include: • Aesthetics • Agriculture and Forestry Resources • Air Quality • Biological Resources • Cultural Resources • Geology and Soils • Greenhouse Gas Emissions • Hazards and Hazardous Materials • Hydrology and Water Quality • Land Use and Planning • Mineral Resources • Noise • Population and Housing • Public Services • Recreation • Transportation/Traffic • Utilities and Service Systems after the Initial Study Checklist The environmental analysis in this section is patterned recommended by the State CEQA Guidelines, Appendix G, and is used by the City in its environmental review process. For the preliminary environmental assessment undertaken as part of this Initial Study's preparation, a determination that there is a potential for significant effects indicates the need to fully analyze the project's impacts and to identify mitigation. For the evaluation of potential impacts, the questions in the Initial Study Checklist are stated with appropriate answers provided according to the analysis undertaken as part of the Initial Study. The analysis considers the project's long-term, direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts. To each question, there are four possible responses: • No Impact. The project will not have any measurable environmental impact on the environment. • Less Than Significant Impact. The project will have the potential for impacting the environment, although this impact will be below established thresholds that are considered to be significant. • Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. The project will have the potential to generate impacts that may be considered as a significant effect on the environment, although mitigation measures or changes to the project's physical or operational characteristics can reduce these impacts to levels that are less than significant. • Potentially Significant Impact. The project will have impacts that are considered significant, and additional analysis is required to identify mitigation measures that could reduce these impacts to less than significant levels. Where potential impacts are anticipated to be significant, mitigation measures will be required, so that impacts may be avoided or reduced to insignificant levels. Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 6 May 2017 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening 2.6.3 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. x Aesthetics Mineral Resources Agriculture and Forestry Resources X Noise Air Quality Population and Housing x Biological Resources Public Services x Cultural Resources Recreation x Geology and Soils Transportation/Traffic Greenhouse Gas Emissions x Tribal Cultural Resources Hazards and Hazardous Materials Utilities and Service Systems X Hydrology and Water Quality X Mandatory Findings of Significance Land Use and Planning May 2017 7 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 8 May 2017 Perris. ake Elsinore land 9e •Sedco Hills Wildom ar' Murrieta? NAVAL WEAPONS 5 rAT!ON SEAL BEACi,' C'ETACNMENrcALLPP•7',.. Fallbrook. Legend ieu* Project Site Ntievo. ,AK -y Airport Aomoland DOUG L. BUTTE 5un City Winchel Murrieta 4rench Hot Spring s Valley Airport Temecula' AN TAlN Project Site A 74#1A y JUN TAW libiA PA VA* 'en1.4A 0.4 LA Content may not reflect National Geographic's"ZurrentImap policy. Sources: National Geographic, Esri, DeLorme, HERE, UNEP-WCMC, USGS, NASA, ESA, METI, NRCAN, GEBCO, NOA-A, increment P Corp. Michael Baker INTERNATIONAL PECHANGA PARKWAY WIDENING PROJECT IS/MND 0 1 2 4 Miles Regional Vicinity Map Exhibit 1 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 10 May 2017 Michael Baker INTERNATIONAL JN 153547 PECHANGA PARKWAY WIDENING PROJECT IS/MND Local Vicinity Map Figure 2 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 12 May 2017 Michael Baker VIA Figure 3e Figure 3b Figure 3c Figure 3d 1211 ms: s ._: DRIVE Michael Baker ,F110 COUNTY MI. OR SJITE ,c ', INTERNATIONAL we..Fnwncaa �)SJETIN a EITCIRM DRAIN b8 _\ _I .,t H�aJil�_ T -� • PECHANGA PARKWAY vv 12LH V =1 DPMi- TH. '_JDO i 8 S1,7 88 8 8ib1 8 PECHANGA PARKWAY WIDENING PROJECT IS/MND Site Plan INTERNATIONAL JN,53547 Figure 3a City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK Initial Study,Mitigated Negative Declaration 14 May 2017 Michael Baker 777 rt , Figure 3a Figure 3b EXISTING; STDRi i DRAIN WHAIiNi\IFL S NT. ENI/SELF WH.IQT Figure 3c Figure 3d COM MAIM MLN MIME Me LIE LOMTIM 1MOMr1 MWm.OI1 to MUIWT IN WM WOLF VALLEY RD. r WME F6 r91 (fVM1E121NC MiQFII.E) DEVELOPMENT Tic. 29305 E6 4 "--SLCIAE REEAIN 8ALL DAMENT SED MTH 8 DM �*DA/TI LE.. IONS tx. DAYLIGHT 8 er.iY1KE L-� AL iiM.. )) Irolul Novnrla VIA EWARDO Michael Bilker ANEMIA GEM, eme10INTERNATIONALRe.wnct PECHANGA PARKWAY PECHANGA PARKWAY WIDENING PROJECT IS/MND Site Plan INTERNATIONAL ,N,53547 Figure 3b City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 16 May 2017 0 ;;il WOLF CREEK DEVELOPMENT IFL 29305 9:XISTIN9 STORM DRAJN CHANNEL 8 0 Michael Baker INTERNATIONAL', Michael Baker RV MEP 0111.2 ,mR Fgure 3a Figure 3b Figure 3c Figure 3d L. ORIA 5F, -` 6} ---kms.. ' L �Tw x r$rm' SEN; P7CHA1v1CiA CA3iNC PECHANGA PARKWAY 40 20 0 W ff_AE 1 442 PECHANGA PARKWAY WIDENING PROJECT IS/MND Site Plan INTERNATIONAL JN 153501 Figure 3c City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK Initial StudylMitigoted Negative Declaration 18 May 2017 Michael Baker Figure 3a Figure 3b Figure 3c r Figure 3d WOLF CREEK DEVELOPMENT 29305 :U3 -11N5 :5-r RnA .,. Michael Baker 5,41,E lee 1 0 11 A L Leucrnm% 1 c � PECHANGA PARKWAY eo PECHANGA PARKWAY WIDENING PROJECT IS/MND Site Plan INTERNATIONAL ,N Is3sn Figure 3d City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK Initial StudylMitigated Negative Declaration 20 May2017 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS The following evaluation provides responses to the questions in the CEQA Environmental Checklist. A brief explanation for each question in the checklist is provided to support each impact determination. All responses consider the whole of the action involved, including construction and operational impacts, as well as direct and indirect impacts. Environmental factors potentially affected by the proposed project are presented below and organized according to the provided checklist format. Evaluation of the following resources was based on review of preliminary construction plans, available site geotechnical data, and other sources listed in Section 4.0, References, of this analysis. 3.1 AESTHETICS 1. AESTHETICS—would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State scenic highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? ❑ 0 0 0 ❑ ❑ 0 0 ❑ 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? Determination: Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. A scenic vista is generally defined as a view of undisturbed natural lands exhibiting a unique or unusual feature that comprises an important or dominant portion of the view shed. Scenic vistas may also be represented by a particular distant view that provides visual relief from less attractive views of nearby features. Other designated federal and State lands, as well as local open space or recreational areas, may also offer scenic vistas if they represent a valued aesthetic view within the surrounding landscape of nearby features. Temecula's natural setting offers a variety of scenic vistas and view sheds. The City of Temecula General Plan Community Design Element designates the southern, eastern, and western rolling hills surrounding the City, as well as Murrieta and Temecula Creeks, as significant natural features, and indicates that public views of these features should be protected and enhanced. The General Plan explains that all public or private development projects are subject to City review to ensure that they will not obstruct public views of scenic resources, and projects may be subject to redesign or height limitations if it is determined that development would block public views. May 2017 21 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 1. AESTHETICS—would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State scenic highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? ❑ 0 0 0 ❑ ❑ 0 0 ❑ 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? Determination: Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. A scenic vista is generally defined as a view of undisturbed natural lands exhibiting a unique or unusual feature that comprises an important or dominant portion of the view shed. Scenic vistas may also be represented by a particular distant view that provides visual relief from less attractive views of nearby features. Other designated federal and State lands, as well as local open space or recreational areas, may also offer scenic vistas if they represent a valued aesthetic view within the surrounding landscape of nearby features. Temecula's natural setting offers a variety of scenic vistas and view sheds. The City of Temecula General Plan Community Design Element designates the southern, eastern, and western rolling hills surrounding the City, as well as Murrieta and Temecula Creeks, as significant natural features, and indicates that public views of these features should be protected and enhanced. The General Plan explains that all public or private development projects are subject to City review to ensure that they will not obstruct public views of scenic resources, and projects may be subject to redesign or height limitations if it is determined that development would block public views. May 2017 21 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening The project site is located approximately one mile south of Temecula Creek and 0.4 miles east of the southern rolling hills that surround the City. Both Temecula Creek and the southern rolling hills are designated as view sheds within the City's General Plan. Existing development north of the project site blocks public views to the Temecula Creek. As such, the construction and operation of the proposed project would not have the potential to adversely impact views to Temecula Creek and its associated aesthetic features; however, public views of the southern rolling hills are afforded to motorists and pedestrians traveling along Pechanga Parkway. Residents east of the project site also have views to the rolling hills, and thus may be impacted through project implementation. For this reason, construction of the proposed project has the potential to adversely impact views to the southern rolling hills and their associated aesthetic features. Mitigation Measure AES -1 would require designation of temporary construction staging areas in a clustered fashion in order to minimize construction -related aesthetic impacts to existing views of the southern rolling hills. With the implementation of Mitigation Measure AES -1, construction - related impacts would be less than significant. The project does not propose any new permanent aboveground structures that would block views of the southern rolling hills. The roadway improvements would consist of relocating/installing traffic signals/street lighting, widening Pechanga Parkway from four to six lanes, installation of a fiber optics cable, and relocation of the existing landscaped median. The existing traffic signals and street lighting would be relocated to accommodate the expanded roadway. These are not considered improvements that would substantially affect views of the southern rolling hills. Therefore, with incorporation of Mitigation Measure AES -1, impacts would be less than significant. MITIGATION MEASURES AES -1 Prior to construction, the City shall define the temporary construction equipment staging areas to be used within the project site. Materials, heavy-duty equipment, and debris piles shall be clustered in order to minimize visual impacts during construction. b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State scenic highway? Determination: No Impact. No rock outcroppings or historic buildings are present onsite. According to the California Department of Transportation's Scenic Highways Program Database, the project area does not contain any officially designated scenic highways (Caltrans 2016). The nearest eligible scenic highway is Interstate 15 (1-15), which is located approximately 1.35 miles west of the project site. Views of the 1-15 are not afforded from the project site. Due to the absence of designated scenic highways in the vicinity of the project site, no impact would occur. c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? Determination: Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. The project site is characterized by paved asphalt roadway ROW. The site is surrounded by residential, commercial, drainage, undeveloped, and entertainment land uses. Short-term visual impacts associated with project construction activities would occur due to the presence of construction equipment and heavy-duty vehicles, materials and debris piles, and general construction activities; however, these impacts would be temporary and limited to the construction duration of the project. Mitigation Measure AES -1, included above, would reduce Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 22 May 2017 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening visual impacts through the clustering of construction equipment within onsite temporary staging areas to reduce the visibility of construction activities from offsite public vantage points. The project would result in limited permanent visual changes associated with the minor fill and paving of areas adjacent to the existing roadway and possible relocation of landscaped medians, signals/lighting, and utilities. As such, once construction is complete, the road widening would not impact the visual character of the project site. Based on these considerations and with implementation of Mitigation Measure AES -1, the proposed project would have a less than significant operational impact on the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings. MITIGATION MEASURES AES -1 Refer to Impact 3.1(a), above. d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Temporary glare from construction activities (including construction equipment and related materials) is possible, but due to the anticipated small -sized construction crew and short-term construction duration, no new substantial sources of Tight or glare would result from the project. Construction would occur during daylight hours, and the project would not require nighttime construction lighting. The project does not propose any nighttime construction activities that would require the use of nighttime lighting. As such, substantial impacts related to light or glare are not anticipated during project construction. Anticipated long-term light sources would include traffic signals and street lighting. These lighting features would be installed or relocated in order to safeguard public safety of motorists and pedestrians travelling along Pechanga Parkway. The light sources proposed with the project are not considered substantial and would be similar to existing lighting sources along Pechanga Parkway and would be designed to avoid light spillage from the right-of-way to the adjoining properties. Further, the project would be required to comply with Riverside County Ordinance 655, which regulates light pollution for the Palomar Observatory. Palomar Observatory is located approximately 17 miles southeast of the project site. According to Ordinance 665, the project is located in Zone B (15-45 miles from the Palomar Observatory). The project would comply with the development standards outlined for Zone B, including its lamp type and shielding requirements. Compliance with Ordinance 665 would ensure that the project's impacts related to light pollution would be less than significant. For these reasons, impacts associated with the construction and long-term operation of the project would be Tess than significant. May 2017 23 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening 3.2 AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY RESOURCES 2. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES — In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest resources, including the Forest and Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment project; and forest carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest Protocols adopted by the California Air Resources Board. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to nonagricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code Section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code Section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code Section 51104(g))? d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forestland to non -forest use? e) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of farmland to nonagricultural use or conversion of forestland to non -forest use? ❑ ❑ 0 Q ❑ 0 0 Q O 0 0 IJ O 0 0 LI ❑ 0 0 LJ Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to nonagricultural use? Determination: No Impact. According to the California Department of Conservation (2012) Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program (FMMP), the project site is not located in an area identified as Prime Farmland, Farmland of Statewide Importance, or Farmland of Local Importance. Along the affected segment, all adjoining lands are designated as Urban and Built -Up Land with the exception of the two undeveloped parcels that border the site to the east. These parcels are designated as Farmland of Local Importance; however, all improvements proposed with the project would occur within the right-of-way and would not encroach onto or interfere with any activities on these adjacent lands. As such, the project would not convert farmland to non- agricultural use. No impact would occur. Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 24 May 2017 Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 2. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES — In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest resources, including the Forest and Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment project; and forest carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest Protocols adopted by the California Air Resources Board. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to nonagricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code Section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code Section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code Section 51104(g))? d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forestland to non -forest use? e) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of farmland to nonagricultural use or conversion of forestland to non -forest use? ❑ ❑ 0 Q ❑ 0 0 Q O 0 0 IJ O 0 0 LI ❑ 0 0 LJ Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to nonagricultural use? Determination: No Impact. According to the California Department of Conservation (2012) Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program (FMMP), the project site is not located in an area identified as Prime Farmland, Farmland of Statewide Importance, or Farmland of Local Importance. Along the affected segment, all adjoining lands are designated as Urban and Built -Up Land with the exception of the two undeveloped parcels that border the site to the east. These parcels are designated as Farmland of Local Importance; however, all improvements proposed with the project would occur within the right-of-way and would not encroach onto or interfere with any activities on these adjacent lands. As such, the project would not convert farmland to non- agricultural use. No impact would occur. Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 24 May 2017 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? Determination: No Impact. Refer to Impact 3.2(a), above. As a roadway, Pechanga Parkway does not have a zoning designation. Further, there are no Williamson Act or agriculturally zoned properties adjacent to the project site. No impact would occur in this regard. c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code Section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code Section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code Section 51104(g))? Determination: No Impact. According to the City of Temecula's General Plan and Development Code, the proposed project would not be located adjacent to areas designated or zoned as forest land. Therefore, implementation of the proposed project would not conflict with existing zoning of forest land, timberland, or timberland production, and no impact would occur. d) Result in the loss of forestland or conversion of forest land to non forest use? Determination: No Impact. Refer to Impact 3.2(c), above. No impact would occur. e) Involve other changes in the existing environment, which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of farmland to nonagricultural use? Determination: No Impact. Refer to Impacts 3.2(a) and 3.2(b), above. No impact would occur. May 2017 25 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening 3.3 AIR QUALITY 3. AIR QUALITY— Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is nonattainment under an applicable federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? o o Q o ❑ ❑ 0 0 O 0 Q 0 Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? Determination: No Impact. The proposed project site is located in the South Coast Air Basin (Basin), which is under the jurisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). The SCAQMD is required, pursuant to the federal Clean Air Act (CAA), to reduce emissions of criteria pollutants for which the Basin is in nonattainment: ozone (O3), coarse particulate matter (PM10), and fine particulate matter (PM2.$). These are considered criteria pollutants because they are three of several prevalent air pollutants known to be hazardous to human health.' In order to reduce emissions of criteria pollutants for which the Basin is in nonattainment, the SCAQMD has adopted the 2012 Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP). The 2016 AQMP is currently in draft form and has not yet been adopted The 2012 AQMP establishes a program of rules and regulations directed at reducing air pollutant emissions and achieving State (California) and national air quality standards. The 2012 AQMP is a regional and multi -agency effort including the SCAQMD, the California Air Resources Board (CARB), Southern California Council of Governments (SCAG), and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The 2012 AQMP pollutant control strategies are based on the latest scientific and technical information and planning assumptions, including SCAG's 2012 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS), updated emission inventory methodologies for various source categories and SCAG's latest growth forecasts. SCAG's latest growth forecasts were defined in consultation with 1 An area designated as nonattainment for an air pollutant is an area that does not achieve national and/or State ambient air quality standards for that pollutant. Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 26 May 2017 Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 3. AIR QUALITY— Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is nonattainment under an applicable federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? o o Q o ❑ ❑ 0 0 O 0 Q 0 Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? Determination: No Impact. The proposed project site is located in the South Coast Air Basin (Basin), which is under the jurisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). The SCAQMD is required, pursuant to the federal Clean Air Act (CAA), to reduce emissions of criteria pollutants for which the Basin is in nonattainment: ozone (O3), coarse particulate matter (PM10), and fine particulate matter (PM2.$). These are considered criteria pollutants because they are three of several prevalent air pollutants known to be hazardous to human health.' In order to reduce emissions of criteria pollutants for which the Basin is in nonattainment, the SCAQMD has adopted the 2012 Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP). The 2016 AQMP is currently in draft form and has not yet been adopted The 2012 AQMP establishes a program of rules and regulations directed at reducing air pollutant emissions and achieving State (California) and national air quality standards. The 2012 AQMP is a regional and multi -agency effort including the SCAQMD, the California Air Resources Board (CARB), Southern California Council of Governments (SCAG), and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The 2012 AQMP pollutant control strategies are based on the latest scientific and technical information and planning assumptions, including SCAG's 2012 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS), updated emission inventory methodologies for various source categories and SCAG's latest growth forecasts. SCAG's latest growth forecasts were defined in consultation with 1 An area designated as nonattainment for an air pollutant is an area that does not achieve national and/or State ambient air quality standards for that pollutant. Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 26 May 2017 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening local governments and with reference to local general plans. The project is subject to the SCAQMD's AQMP. It is noted that the SCAQMD has released the Draft 2016 AQMP, which is a comprehensive and integrated plan primarily focused on addressing the ozone and PM2.5 standards; however, the Draft 2016 AQMP is anticipated to be adopted by the SCAQMD Governing Board December 2016. The 2016 AQMP will incorporate the latest scientific and technical information and planning assumptions, including the latest applicable growth assumptions, RTP/SCS, and updated emission inventory methodologies for various source categories. The 2016 AQMD uses the same assumptions as the 2012 AQMP, and adoption of the 2016 AQMP would not affect project consistency.2 The Criteria for determining consistency with the AQMP is defined by the following indicators: • Consistency Criterion No. 1: The proposed project will not result in an increase in the frequency or severity of existing air quality violations, or cause or contribute to new violations, or delay the timely attainment of air quality standards or the interim emissions reductions specified in the AQMP. • Consistency Criterion No. 2: The proposed project will not exceed the assumptions in the AQMP based on the years of project buildout phase. The violations to which Consistency Criterion No. 1 refers are the California ambient air quality standards (CAAQS) and the national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS). As evaluated under Impact 3.3 (b) below, the project would not exceed the short-term construction standards or long- term operational standards and in so doing would not violate any air quality standards. Additionally, the analysis for long-term local air quality impacts shows that future carbon monoxide (CO) concentration levels along roadways and at intersections affected by project traffic would not exceed the 1 -hour and 8 -hour State CO pollutant concentration standards. Thus, a less than significant impact is expected, and the project would be consistent with the first criterion. Concerning Consistency Criterion No. 2, the AQMP contains air pollutant reduction strategies and demonstrates that the applicable ambient air quality standards can be achieved within the periods required under federal law. Growth projections from local general plans adopted by cities in the district are provided to SCAG, which develops regional growth forecasts that are used to develop future air quality forecasts for the AQMP. Development consistent with the growth projections in the City of Temecula General Plan is considered consistent with the AQMP. The proposed project would accommodate existing and predicted traffic demands and uphold the City of Temecula's goals to reduce traffic congestion, improve roadway safety, and provide better access to regional transportation routes. Project implementation would provide additional roadway capacity to accommodate the expansion of Pechanga Resort & Casino and continued residential development along Pechanga Parkway. In response to high traffic volumes, the proposed project would continue the 2009 Pechanga Parkway Phase II improvements. As the project would be designed to accommodate additional traffic volumes, the proposed improvements would not directly generate new traffic or increase the number of vehicles along the roadway. 2 The SCAQMD Governing Board will have Public Hearing to consider adoption of the 2016 Air Quality Management Plan (2016 AQMP), which outlines its strategies for meeting the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and ozone (03), on March 3, 2017. May 2017 27 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening The project would not conflict with the land use assumptions contained in the City's General Plan. Furthermore, due to the nature of the proposed project as a roadway facility improvement project, it would not result in an increase in population or employment growth beyond that anticipated in the 2012 AQMP. The proposed project would accommodate existing and predicted traffic demands and uphold the City of Temecula's goals to reduce traffic congestion, improve roadway safety, and provide better access to regional transportation routes. The project would be designed to accommodate additional traffic volumes, and would not directly generate new traffic or increase the number of vehicles along the roadway and would not result in any development or other improvements that could directly or indirectly induce population growth in the area. For these reasons, the proposed project would not conflict with or obstruct implementation of the 2012 AQMP. No impact would occur. b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? Determination: Less than Significant Impact. A discussion of the project's potential short-term construction period and long-term operational period air quality impacts is provided below. Construction Emissions The SCAQMD has established methods to quantify air emissions associated with construction activities, such as those generated by operation of onsite construction equipment, fugitive dust emissions related to grading and site work activities, and mobile (tailpipe) emissions from construction worker vehicles and haul/delivery truck trips. Emissions would vary from day to day, depending on the level of activity, the specific type of construction activity occurring, and, for fugitive dust, prevailing weather conditions. Dust (PM10) is typically a major concern during rough grading activities. Because such emissions are not amenable to collection and discharge through a controlled source, they are called "fugitive emissions." Fugitive dust emission rates vary as a function of many parameters (e.g., soil silt, soil moisture, wind speed, area disturbed, number of vehicles, depth of disturbance or excavation). All development projects in Temecula, including the proposed project, are subject to SCAQMD rules and regulations to reduce fugitive dust emissions and to mitigate potential air quality impacts per City of Temecula Municipal Code Section 18.06.300 (Dust Control and Prevention Plan), which requires that dust prevention and control procedures be employed while construction activity occurs to minimize windborne particles, and that all grading operations, land clearing, loading, stockpiling, landscaping, vehicular track -out, and haul routes comply with SCAQMD Rule 403. SCAQMD Rule 403 (Fugitive Dust) requires fugitive dust sources to implement best available control measures for all sources, and all forms of visible particulate matter are prohibited from crossing any property line. SCAQMD Rule 403 is intended to reduce PM emissions from any transportation, handling, construction, or storage activity that has the potential to generate fugitive dust. PM suppression techniques are summarized below. a) Portions of the construction site to remain inactive longer than a period of three months will be seeded and watered until grass cover is grown or otherwise stabilized in a manner acceptable to the City. b) All onsite roads will be paved as soon as feasible or watered periodically or chemically stabilized. Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 28 May 2017 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening c) All material transported off-site will be either sufficiently watered or securely covered to prevent excessive amounts of dust. d) The area disturbed by clearing, grading, earthmoving, or excavation operations will be minimized at all times. e) Where vehicles leave the construction site and enter adjacent public streets, the streets will be swept daily or washed down at the end of the workday to remove soil tracked onto the paved surface. f) Installation and utilization of a wheel washing system to remove bulk material from tires and vehicle undercarriages before vehicles exit the site. Impacts assume compliance with applicable SCAQMD Rules. The SCAQMD Rules that are currently applicable during construction activity for this project include but are not limited to: Rule 1113 (Architectural Coatings); Rule 431.2 (Low Sulfur Fuel); Rule 403 (Fugitive Dust); and Rule 1186/1186.1 (Street Sweepers). Rule 1113 and Rule 403 are quantified in the emissions model. Emissions were calculated using the California Emissions Estimator Model (CaIEEMod), version 2016.3.1, a Statewide land use emissions computer model designed to provide a uniform platform for use by government agencies, land use planners, and environmental professionals. This model was developed in coordination with the SCAQMD and is the most current emissions model approved for use in California by various other air districts. The estimated maximum daily construction emissions are summarized in Table 3.3-1, Maximum Short -Term Construction Emissions (Pounds per Day). As shown in Table 3.3-1, all construction -generated criteria pollutant emissions would remain below their respective thresholds and therefore would represent a less than significant impact. Table 3.3-1: Maximum Short -Term Construction Emissions (Pounds per Day) Construction Phase Reactive Organic Gas Nitrogen Oxide Carbon Monoxide Sulfur Oxide Coarse Particulate Matter Fine Particulate Matter Roadway Construction 2.68 27.07 18.54 0.03 4.35 1.71 SCAQMD Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55 Exceed Threshold? No No No No No No Source: CaIEEMod, version 2016.3.1. See Appendix A Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Data. Operational Emissions None of the components of the proposed project would include the provision of new permanent stationary or mobile sources of emissions. Therefore, by its nature, the project would not generate quantifiable criteria emissions from long-term operations. The project does not propose any new buildings, and therefore, no permanent source of stationary source emissions. In addition, once completed the project would not result in a permanent increase in traffic. The proposed project would accommodate existing and predicted traffic demands and uphold the City of Temecula's goals to reduce traffic congestion, improve roadway safety, and provide better access to regional transportation routes. The project would be designed to accommodate additional traffic volumes and would not directly generate new traffic or increase the number of vehicles along the roadway. Additionally, the project would improve a non -motorized transportation option by providing a sidewalk for pedestrians. Traffic conditions after the project is constructed are expected to be the same as or slightly better than existing traffic conditions. May 2017 29 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening Therefore, the project would not result in new permanent stationary or mobile sources of emissions. The proposed project would not exceed SCAQMD thresholds of significance for construction - generated criteria air pollutants and would not generate any air pollutants under its operation, resulting in a less than significant impact. c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is nonattainment under an applicable federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Related projects could contribute to an existing or projected air quality exceedance because the Basin is currently nonattainment for 03 and PM25. With regard to determining the significance of the contribution from the project, the SCAQMD recommends that any given project's potential contribution to cumulative impacts should be assessed using the same significance criteria as for project -specific impacts. Therefore, this analysis assumes that individual projects that do not generate operational or construction emissions which exceed the SCAQMD's recommended daily thresholds for project -specific impacts would also not cause a commutatively considerable increase in emissions for those pollutants for which the air basin is in nonattainment and therefore would not be considered to have a significant, adverse air quality impact. Alternatively, individual project -related construction and operational emissions that exceed SCAQMD thresholds for project -specific impacts would be considered cumulatively considerable. As previously noted, the project would not exceed the applicable SCAQMD regional threshold for construction and operational -source emissions. As such, the project would result in a cumulatively less than significant impact. d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Sensitive populations (sensitive receptors) are more susceptible to air pollution effects than the general population. Sensitive populations that are in proximity to localized sources of toxics and CO are of particular concern. Some land uses are considered more sensitive to air quality changes than others, depending on the population groups and the activities involved. The following types of people are most likely to be adversely affected by air pollution, as identified by CARB: children under 14; elderly over 65; athletes; and, people with cardiovascular and chronic respiratory diseases. Locations with potential to contain a high concentration of these sensitive population groups are called sensitive receptors and include residential areas, hospitals, day-care facilities, elder -care facilities, places of worship, elementary schools, and parks. Sensitive receptors in the project area include residential uses, schools, and parks. During construction, incidental amounts of toxic substances such as oils, solvents, paints, adhesives, and coatings would be used. The use and application of these substances would comply with all applicable SCAQMD rules for their use, storage, and disposal. The SCAQMD has established that impacts to air quality are significant if there is a potential to contribute or cause localized exceedances of the federal and/or State ambient air quality standards (NAAQS/CAAQS). Collectively, these are referred to as localized significance thresholds (LSTs). The significance of localized emissions impacts depends on whether ambient levels in the vicinity of a given proposed project are above or below State standards. In the case of CO and NO, if ambient levels are below the standards, a project is considered to have a significant impact if project emissions result in an exceedance of one or more of these standards. If ambient levels Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 30 May 2017 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening already exceed a State or federal standard, project emissions are considered significant if they increase ambient concentrations by a measurable amount. This would apply to PMlo and PM2.5, both of which are nonattainment pollutants. The SCAQMD established LSTs in response to the district's Governing Board's Environmental Justice Initiative 1-4, which was developed in response to environmental justice and health concerns raised by the public regarding exposure of individuals to criteria pollutants in local communities. LSTs represent the maximum emissions from a project that will not cause or contribute to an exceedance of the most stringent applicable federal or State ambient air quality standard at the nearest residence or sensitive receptor. The SCAQMD adopted LSTs that show whether a project would cause or contribute to localized air quality impacts and thereby cause or contribute to potential localized adverse health effects. The analysis makes use of methodology included in the SCAQMD's (2008) Localized Significance Threshold Methodology. The SCAQMD states that lead agencies can use the LSTs as another indicator of significance in air quality impact analyses. LSTs are based on the ambient concentrations of that pollutant within the project source receptor area (SRA), as demarcated by the SCAQMD, and the distance to the nearest sensitive receptor. The project site is located in SCAQMD SRA 26. LSTs apply to CO, nitrogen dioxide (NO2), PM10, and PM2,5. The SCAQMD look -up tables are intended for projects less than or equal to 5 acres in size and provide standards for projects that are 1, 2, and 5 acres; however, the proposed project site spans approximately 3 acres. Therefore, 3 acres was extrapolated using the information provided from 1, 2, and 5 -acre sites in the look -up table to identify the standard. The nearest sensitive receptors are the single-family residential communities directly adjacent to the project on either side of Pechanga Parkway. Notwithstanding, the SCAQMD methodology explicitly states: "It is possible that a project may have receptors closer than 25 meters. Projects with boundaries located closer than 25 meters to the nearest receptor should use the LSTs for receptors located at 25 meters." Therefore, LSTs for receptors located at 25 meters were utilized in this analysis. Table 3.3-2, Localized Significance Summary — Onsite Construction Emissions (Pounds per Day), identifies the localized impacts at the nearest receptor location in the project vicinity. As shown, emissions during the peak day of construction activity would not exceed the SCAQMD's LST screening thresholds. Therefore, the project's impact on sensitive receptors is less than significant. Table 3.3-2: Localized Significance Summary—Onsite Construction Emissions (Pounds per Da Construction Phase NOx CO PM10 PM2.s Maximum Emissions Maximum Daily Emissions (onsite) 18.84 13.09 2.17 1.32 SCAQMD Localized Threshold 279.67 867.00 9.00 5.33 Threshold Exceeded? No No No No Source: CaIEEMod, version 2016.3.1. See Appendix A, Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Data. Carbon Monoxide Hotspots CO emissions are a function of vehicle idling time, meteorological conditions, and traffic flow. Under certain extreme meteorological conditions, CO concentrations near a congested roadway or intersection may reach unhealthful levels (i.e., adversely affecting residents, schoolchildren, hospital patients, the elderly, etc.). The SCAQMD requires a quantified assessment of CO hotspots when a project increases the volume -to -capacity ratio (also called the intersection capacity utilization [ICU]) by 0.02 (two percent) for any intersection with an existing level of service LOS D May 2017 31 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening or worse. Because traffic congestion is highest at intersections, where vehicles queue and are subject to reduced speeds, these hot spots are typically produced at intersections. As noted previously, the proposed project involves widening Pechanga Parkway and would not generate new vehicle trips. The proposed project would reduce congestion and improve traffic flow. Therefore, it would not increase the ICU of nearby intersections to warrant a CO hotspot analysis. e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Land uses generally associated with odor complaints include agricultural uses (livestock and farming), wastewater treatment plants, food processing plants, chemical plants, composting operations, refineries, landfills, dairies, and fiberglass molding facilities. The project involves roadway improvements and does not contain land uses typically associated with emitting objectionable odors. Potential odor sources associated with the proposed project may result from construction equipment exhaust and the application of asphalt during construction activities. Standard construction requirements would minimize odor impacts from construction. Construction odor emissions would be temporary, intermittent in nature, would disperse rapidly, would not affect a substantial number of people, and would cease upon completion of the respective phase of construction. Therefore, odor impacts are considered less than significant. Additionally, construction activities would be required to comply with SCAQMD Rule 4023 to prevent occurrences of public nuisances. 3 SCAQMD Rule 402 require implementation of dust suppression techniques to prevent fugitive dust from creating a nuisance. Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 32 May 2017 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening 3.4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES—Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special - status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or US Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or US Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted habitat conservation plan, natural community conservation plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan? o 0 0 0 O 0 0 E O 0 0 E o Et 0 0 O 0 IJ 0 Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special -status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or US Fish and Wildlife Service? Determination: Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. The project site is located within an urbanized area within the City of Temecula. As a roadway improvement project, the site is presently developed and/or highly disturbed. Manicured landscaped areas are present within the ROW and the existing median and include a variety of tree species, turf grass, and other ornamental plantings. In addition, areas immediately surrounding the project footprint are largely developed, with a channelized drainage feature (Wolf Valley Creek Channel) to the north and some small open fields east and west of Wolf Valley Road, north of the channel. The Wolf Valley Creek Channel is vegetated with ornamental grasses that are routinely maintained (i.e. mowed), does not contain May 2017 33 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES—Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special - status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or US Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or US Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted habitat conservation plan, natural community conservation plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan? o 0 0 0 O 0 0 E O 0 0 E o Et 0 0 O 0 IJ 0 Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special -status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or US Fish and Wildlife Service? Determination: Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. The project site is located within an urbanized area within the City of Temecula. As a roadway improvement project, the site is presently developed and/or highly disturbed. Manicured landscaped areas are present within the ROW and the existing median and include a variety of tree species, turf grass, and other ornamental plantings. In addition, areas immediately surrounding the project footprint are largely developed, with a channelized drainage feature (Wolf Valley Creek Channel) to the north and some small open fields east and west of Wolf Valley Road, north of the channel. The Wolf Valley Creek Channel is vegetated with ornamental grasses that are routinely maintained (i.e. mowed), does not contain May 2017 33 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening any riparian trees/vegetation on the bank or in the bed, and has minimal, if any, nesting habitat or habitat that would otherwise support wildlife. A query of the California Department of Fish and Wildlife's (CDFW) Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) and California Native Plant Society (CNPS) was conducted in November 2016 for reported locations of sensitive plant and wildlife species as well as sensitive natural plant communities within two miles of the project site within the Pechanga and Temecula USGS 7.5 - minute quadrangles (Michael Baker International 2016). The literature search identified nine special -status plant species, fourteen special -status wildlife species, and one special -status natural plant community as being documented within two miles of the project site; refer to Attachment D, Potentially Occurring Status Species Biological Resources, of Appendix B, Habitat Assessment/MSHCP Consistency Analysis. Based on habitat requirements for specific species and the availability and quality of onsite habitats, it was determined that the project site does not provide suitable habitat that would support any of the CNDDB, CNPS, or Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) listed plant or wildlife species that have been documented within two miles of the project site. Additionally, a site survey was performed in November 2016 to identify sensitive habitat and or undeveloped areas, jurisdictional features, riparian/riverine habitat, and other areas having the potential to support sensitive flora and fauna species, including burrowing owl (Michael Baker International 2016); refer to Appendix B. Onsite and surrounding land uses have eliminated the naturally occurring habitats around the project footprint, reducing the suitability of the habitat to support sensitive plant and wildlife species. As a result of existing development, undisturbed native plant communities are no longer present within the boundaries of the project site, and the project footprint does not offer habitat that would support any candidate, sensitive, or special - status species. Further, the project site provides limited habitat for wildlife species adapted to a high degree of human presence and development. No sensitive plant or wildlife species were observed during the habitat assessment. However, a query of the Riverside County Integrated Project (RCIP) Conservation Summary Report Generator was conducted to determine if the MSHCP lists any survey requirements for the project site; refer to Appendix B. The summary report identified that the project site is located in the designated survey area for burrowing owl as depicted in Figure 6-4 within Sections 6.3.2 of the MSHCP; however, no burrowing owl or sign (pellets, feathers, castings, or white wash) were observed during the 2016 site survey. Due to the lack of burrowing owl sign and suitable burrows, burrowing owl are presumed not to occupy the project site and have a low potential to occur onsite. Further, as the proposed widening alignment would occur within the existing paved roadway and landscaped areas, burrowing owl are presumed absent, and no impacts to this species are anticipated; however, it is recommended that a burrowing owl pre -construction clearance survey be conducted within seven days prior to ground disturbance, in accordance with the MSHCP, to ensure burrowing owl remain absent from the project site. Implementation of Mitigation Measure BIO -1 would reduce potential project impacts on burrowing owl to Tess than significant. With implementation of Mitigation Measure BIO -1, project impacts on species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special -status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the CDFW or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) would be reduced to less than significant. initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 34 May 2017 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening MITIGATION MEASURES BIO -1 Within seven days prior to commencement of any ground -disturbing activities (e.g., clearing, grubbing, demolition, earthmoving, construction), burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia) surveys shall be conducted by a qualified biologist per the Burrowing Owl Survey Protocol and Mitigation Guidelines (California Burrowing Owl Consortium 1997) and the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (California Department of Fish and Wildlife [CDFW]; March 7, 2012), as follows: • During the burrowing owl (BUOW) breeding season (February 1 through August 31), protocol surveys for active nest burrows shall be performed within potentially suitable habitat (as determined by the biologist) inside and up to 500 feet from the demarcated disturbance limits. A non -disturbance buffer of 250 feet shall be delineated by the biologist around active nests, in consultation with CDFW, and no disturbance activities shall occur within the buffer(s) until the BUOW breeding season is over. • During the non -breeding season for BUOW (September 1 through January 31), protocol surveys for resident BUOWs shall be performed within potentially suitable habitat (as determined by the biologist) inside and up to 500 feet from the demarcated disturbance limits. A passive relocation program may be implemented for observed BUOWs using occupied burrows pursuant to CDFW approval. The relocation of resident BUOWs shall be according to a relocation plan prepared by the biologist in consultation with and approved by CDFW. This plan shall provide for BUOW relocations to nearby suitable conserved lands possessing available nesting habitat and appropriate development -free buffers that are protected in perpetuity via conservation easements or other land preservation mechanisms. • The pedestrian protocol surveys shall include two early morning surveys between one hour before and two hours after sunrise, and two evening surveys between two hours before and one hour after sunset, via transects spaced to allow 100% visual coverage of the ground surface. The distance between transect center lines shall average approximately 100 feet, and may be reduced in places to account for differences in terrain, vegetation density, and ground surface visibility. b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, and regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or US Fish and Wildlife Service? Determination: No Impact. Refer to Impact 3.4(a), above. Generally, riparian habitat is defined as a vegetated ecosystem along a water body through which energy, materials, and water pass. Riparian areas characteristically have a high water table and are subject to periodic flooding and influence from the adjacent water body. These systems encompass wetlands, adjacent uplands, or some combination of these two landforms. Due to the project setting (and existing condition as a roadway), the potential for sensitive natural communities identified in local or regional plans, policies, and regulations or by the CDFW or USFWS is limited. No jurisdictional riparian/riverine areas are located within the proposed project footprint; however, riparian habitat may be present within the Wolf Valley Creek Channel located immediately north of the project site. It should be noted that the City of Temecula has elected to mitigate previous impacts to Wolf Valley Creek Channel related to the previously implemented May 2017 35 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening Pechanga Parkway improvements (generally from Temecula Parkway to Via Gilberto) through the restoration of a total of 3.4 acres of riparian habitat in Temecula Creek (BonTerra Consulting 2013). This five-year habitat mitigation maintenance program has been successful in achieving performance standards agreed upon by the CDFW and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps). Wolf Valley Creek Channel is artificially maintained, and is planted with ornamental grass. Although artificially created, Wolf Valley Creek Channel would likely be considered riparian/riverine habitat under the MSHCP. Pursuant to Section 6.1.2 of the MSHCP, any alteration or loss of riparian/riverine habitat that may occur with the proposed project would require mitigation in the form of preparation of a Determination of Biologically Equivalent or Superior Preservation (DBESP) to address the replacement of lost functions and values associated with Wolf Valley Creek Channel. This assessment is independent from considerations given to "waters of the U.S." and "waters of the State" under the CWA and the California Fish and Game Code. Based on current design plans, no impacts to Wolf Valley Creek Channel are anticipated with project implementation. If changes in the design plans result in any indirect or direct impacts to riparian habitat within the channel, the City would be required to reduce impacts through identification of appropriate mitigation measures and preparation of a DBESP to mitigate the loss of any riparian habitat. No impacts would occur in this regard. Additionally, under the federal Endangered Species Act (ESA), "Critical Habitat" refers to habitat or a specific geographic area that contains the elements and features that are essential for the survival and recovery of a listed species. In the event that a project may result in take or adverse modification to a species' designated Critical Habitat, a project proponent may be required to engage in suitable mitigation; however, consultation for impacts to Critical Habitat is only required when a project has a federal nexus (i.e. occurs on federal land, is issued federal permits [e.g. Corps Section 404 permit, or Corps Section 408 permit], or receives any other federal oversight or funding). The USFWS Critical Habitat mapper was used to locate the closest federally designated Critical Habitat to the project site which occurs approximately two miles east of the project site for coastal California gnatcatcher (Polioptila californica californica); refer also to Appendix B. The project site is not located within federally designated Critical Habitat. Therefore, no impacts to Critical Habitat would occur with project implementation. c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? Determination: No Impact. The Corps Regulatory Branch regulates discharge of dredge or fill materials into "waters of the United States" pursuant to Section 404 of the federal Clean Water Act (CWA) and Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act. Additionally, the CDFW regulates alterations to streambed and bank under Fish and Wildlife Code Sections 1600 et seq., and the Regional Water Quality Control Board (Regional Board) regulates discharges into surface waters pursuant to Section 401 of the CWA and the California Porter -Cologne Water Quality Control Act. No jurisdictional drainage features or isolated wetland features that would qualify as "waters of the United States" or "waters of the State" are located within the proposed project footprint; however, it should be noted that Wolf Valley Creek Channel is located immediately north of the project site. Wolf Valley Creek Channel receives flows from urban runoff and direct precipitation. Water in this channel flows from southeast to northwest, north of the project site, and eventually flows into Temecula Creek. Wolf Creek Valley Channel is primarily earthen -lined throughout most of its reach, with concrete and riprap armoring at the various road bridge crossings. The slopes of Wolf Valley Creek Channel are artificially maintained, and planted with ornamental grass. The Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 36 May 2017 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening active channel (low flow channel) of Wolf Valley Creek supports cattails (Typha sp.) and California bulrush (Schoenoplectus californicus). Although artificially created, Wolf Valley Creek Channel would likely be considered jurisdictional by the Corps, Regional Board, and CDFW. Based on current design plans, the proposed widening alignment would not impact Wolf Valley Creek Channel. The proposed improvements would occur within the limits of the roadway ROW and have been designed to largely avoid any potential direct impacts to the Wolf Valley Creek Channel; however, if during final design, impacts to Wolf Valley Creek Channel would occur, a formal jurisdictional delineation would be required to delineate the limits of jurisdiction and to determine the potential for impacts from project implementation. It is anticipated that any impacts to Wolf Valley Creek Channel would require a CWA Section 404 permit from the Corps, CWA Section 401 Water Quality Certification from the Regional Board, and a Section 1602 Streambed Alteration Agreement from CDFW. As currently designed, project construction and operation would not impact Wolf Valley Creek Channel or any other protected wetlands. No impact would occur in this regard. d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? Determination: Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. The Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA; 16 U.S. Code 703 through 711) is the domestic law that affirms, or implements, a commitment by the United States to four international conventions (with Canada, Mexico, Japan, and Russia) for the protection of a shared migratory bird resource. The MBTA makes it unlawful at any time, by any means, or in any manner to pursue, hunt, take, capture, or kill migratory birds. The law also applies to the removal of nests occupied by migratory birds during the breeding season. The MBTA makes it unlawful to take, pursue, molest, or disturb these species, their nests, or their eggs anywhere in the United States. The project site is located within a highly urbanized area in the City of Temecula. The existing roadway along the affected segment is four lanes in width, with a 40 mile -per -hour speed limit. Such conditions generally restrict or detract wildlife from crossing a roadway. Additionally, the proposed widening alignment is surrounded by existing development that has removed natural plant communities from the surrounding area. All adjacent lands are developed and do not support habitat that would generally support migratory wildlife with exception of the two parcels adjacent to the north which are presently undeveloped (but highly disturbed from prior grading and/or grubbing); refer to Exhibit 2, Local Vicinity Map. The proposed project would be confined to the existing paved roadway and landscaped areas. Additionally, the project site is not located within any MSHCP identified corridor or linkage. Therefore, no native resident, migratory fish, or wildlife species or established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors are present onsite or in the project vicinity. The project would not impede any use of native wildlife nursery sites or have an adverse effect on any migratory corridors or linkages in the surrounding area. Impacts in this regard are considered less than significant. As shown in Exhibit 2, a number of trees are present within the roadway ROW to the north and south of the affected roadway segment, as well as within the existing median. The ornamental plant communities adjacent to the proposed widening alignment have the potential to provide suitable nesting, foraging, and cover habitat for year-round and seasonal avian residents, and migrating songbirds that may be present in the area; however, no nesting birds or breeding behaviors were observed during the field survey conducted for the proposed project. However, avian species may be affected by short-term project construction -related noise levels during the nesting season for breeding birds (typically January through September annually) May 2017 37 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening which can result in the disruption of foraging, nesting, and reproductive activities. As such, project grading/construction activities during the nesting season for breeding birds protected by the MBTA and California Fish and Game Code could result in a significant temporary, indirect impact to these species. Mitigation Measure BIO -2 would require a pre -construction clearance survey for nesting birds and nest protection actions if active avian nests are identified within or 500 feet from the project site. With implementation of Mitigation Measure BIO -2, project implementation would not substantially interfere with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant with mitigation incorporated. MITIGATION MEASURES BIO -2 1. Within seven days prior to commencement of grading/construction activities, a qualified biologist shall perform a pre -construction survey within 500 feet from the proposed work limits. 2. If active avian nest(s) are discovered within or 500 feet from the work limits, a buffer shall be delineated around the active nest(s) measuring 300 feet for passerines and 500 feet for raptors. A qualified biologist shall monitor the nest(s) weekly after commencement of grading/construction to ensure that nesting behavior is not adversely affected by such activities. 3. If the qualified biologist determines that nesting behavior is adversely affected by grading/construction activities, then a noise mitigation program shall be implemented in consultation with CDFW, to allow such activities to proceed. Once the young have fledged and left the nest(s), then grading/construction activities may proceed within 300 feet (500 feet for raptor species) of the fledged nest(s). 4. Raptor nests are protected under Section 3503.5 of the California Fish and Game Code (California Law 2011) which makes it unlawful to take, possess, or destroy any birds in the orders Falconiformes or Strigiformes; or, to take, possess, or destroy the nests or eggs of any such birds. Consultation with CDFW shall be required prior to the removal of any raptor nest(s) observed during the preconstruction clearance surveys. e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? Determination: Less than Significant Impact. According to the City of Temecula Municipal Code, Section 8.48, Heritage Tree Ordinance, the City aims to protect and preserve heritage trees, specifically "oak, California bay laurel, California black walnut, California holly, and California sycamore trees, as well as other trees of special significance to the community." The Municipal Code defines heritage trees as any of the identified species [including, but not limited to, oaks (i.e. coast live oak, Engelman oak, valley oak, scrub oak), California sycamore, California Bay laurel, and California black walnut] that has been identified in a tree inventory in connection with the submittal of an application for a discretionary permit and that has reached the required diameter of a Heritage Tree. As stated above, a number of trees are present within the roadway ROW to the north and south of the affected roadway segment, as well as within the existing median. As such, some trees may Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 38 May 2017 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening 1) require removal or may be otherwise indirectly disturbed as the result of the proposed improvements; however, none of these trees are considered to be heritage trees. Any tree removal would occur in conformance with City requirements and would not conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance. Impacts would be less than significant in this regard. Conflict with the provisions of an adopted habitat conservation plan, natural community conservation plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan? Determination: No Impact. The City of Temecula and its Planning Area are located within the Western Riverside County MSHCP area; refer to City of Temecula General Plan EIR Figure 5.2, MSHCP Conservation Area. The MSHCP serves as a comprehensive, multi -jurisdictional HCP, pursuant to Section (a)(1)(b) of the federal Endangered Species Act (ESA). The plan encompasses all unincorporated County land west of the crest of the San Jacinto Mountains to the Orange County line, as well as the jurisdictional areas of the cities of Temecula, Murrieta, Lake Elsinore, Canyon Lake, Norco, Corona, Riverside, Moreno Valley, Banning, Beaumont, Calimesa, Perris, Hemet, and San Jacinto. The MSHCP is intended to protect and restore biological diversity and natural ecosystem processes that support such diversity, and to protect and restore natural habitat within western Riverside County known to support threatened, endangered, or key sensitive populations of plant and wildlife species.4 Core Areas within the MSHCP have been identified and represent lands with the right resources to provide live-in habitat and support the requirements of one or more species covered by the MSHCP. Criteria Areas support habitat adjoining the Core Areas, Non-contiguous Habitat Blocks, and Linkages. Species either live within these areas or travel through the area when moving from one area of conserved habitat to another. The Temecula Planning Area is partially located within subunits 1, 2, 5, and 6 of the MSHCP Southwest Area Plan. Each subunit of the Plan identifies conceptual MSHCP reserve designs, applicable cores and linkages, and biological issues and considerations. According to Figure 5.4-2, MSCHP Conservation Area, of the City's General Plan EIR, the project site is not located within the boundary of the MSCHP area or within a criteria cell; however, the project site does lie adjacent to a criteria cell located to the southwest (#7612) within which conservation efforts are concentrated in the western portion of the cell and include protection and enhancement of Riversidean alluvial fan sage scrub, riparian scrub, woodland and forest habitat along Pechanga Creek and adjacent chaparral, woodland, and forest habitat.' Implementation of the proposed project would not affect this criteria cell or conservation efforts/requirements within it. While the project site is located adjacent to a criteria cell (i.e. to the MSHCP Conservation Area) and would be subject to the Urban/Wildlands Interface Guidelines, the first quarter -mile of the criteria cell has been completely developed into a residential neighborhood, and the Urban/Wildlands Guidelines would not benefit the undeveloped portions of the Conservation Area. Additionally, as shown on General Plan EIR Figure 5.4-1, Critical Habitats for California Gnatcatcher and Quino Checkerspot Butterfly, the project site is not located within critical habitat for either of these species and thus will not require any consultation for adverse impacts to critical habitat. ° City of Temecula General Plan Update FEIR. Section 5.4, Biological Resources. 5 Western Riverside County MSHCP. Volume I, Section 3. htto://www.wrc- rca.org/GIS Online Mapping/MSHCP docs/AreaPlans/MSHCP%20Southwest°%20Area%2OCriteria%20Table.odf. Accessed November 4, 2016. May 2017 39 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening Riparian/Riverine Areas Under MSHCP Section 6.1.2, riparian/riverine areas are defined as areas dominated by trees, shrubs, persistent emergent plants, or emergent mosses and lichens which occur close to or are dependent upon nearby freshwater, or areas with freshwater flowing during all or a portion of the year. Conservation of these areas is intended to protect habitat that is essential to a number of listed, water -dependent amphibians, birds, fish, invertebrates, and plants. As stated above under Impact 3.4(a), if impacts to riparian/riverine habitat cannot be avoided, mitigation in the form of a Determination of Biologically Equivalent or Superior Preservation must be developed to address the replacement of lost functions of habitats in regards to the listed species. This assessment is independent from considerations given to "waters of the U.S." and "waters of the State" under the CWA and the California Fish and Game Code. No jurisdictional riparian/riverine areas are located within the proposed project footprint. As noted above under Impact 3.4(a), although artificially created, Wolf Valley Creek Channel would likely be considered riparian/riverine habitat under the MSHCP. Pursuant to Section 6.1.2 of the MSHCP, any alteration or loss of riparian/riverine habitat that may occur with project implementation would require preparation of a DBESP to ensure the replacement of any lost functions and values associated with Wolf Valley Creek Channel. Based on current design plans, no impacts to Wolf Valley Creek Channel are anticipated with project implementation, and no conflicts with the MSHCP would occur. Vernal Pools The MSHCP lists two general classes of soils known to be associated with special -status plant species: clay soils and Traver -Domino Willow association soils. The specific clay soils known to be associated with special -status species within the MSHCP plan area include Bosanko, Auld, Altamont, and Porterville series soils, whereas Traver -Domino Willows association includes saline - alkali soils largely located along floodplain areas of the San Jacinto River and Salt Creek. Without the appropriate soils to create the impermeable restrictive layer, none of the special -status species associated with vernal pools can occur on the project site. None of these soils are present on the project site. Since the proposed widening alignment would occur within the existing paved roads and landscaped areas, no undisturbed soils would be impacted. Therefore, no impacts to vernal pools or fairy shrimp habitat would occur with project implementation. Narrow Endemic Plant Species Based on a query of the RCIP Conservation Summary Report Generator and review of the MSHCP, it was determined that the proposed project is not located within the designated survey area for Narrow Endemic Plant Species as depicted in Figure 6-1 within Section 6.1.3 of the MSHCP; refer also to Appendix B. The proposed widening alignment would occur within the existing paved roadway and landscaped areas that do not provide suitable habitat for Narrow Endemic Plant Species. Urban/Wildlands Interface Guidelines According to the MSHCP, the Urban/Wildlands Interface Guidelines are intended to address indirect effects associated with new development in proximity to MSHCP Conservation Areas (MSHCP, p 6-42). The proposed project is not located in or immediately adjacent to any Criteria Cells or MSHCP Conservation Areas. Therefore, indirect project -related impacts to drainage, toxics, lighting, noise, invasive plant species, barriers, and grading/land development would not occur. Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 40 May 2017 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening Additional Survey Needs and Procedures The RCIP Conservation Summary Report Generator was queried to determine if the MSHCP lists any survey requirements for the project. The summary report identified that the project site is located in the designated survey area for burrowing owl as depicted in Figure 6-4 within Sections 6.3.2 of the MSHCP; however, no burrowing owl or sign (pellets, feathers, castings, or white wash) were observed during the habitat assessment. Due to the lack of burrowing owl sign and suitable burrows, burrowing owl are presumed not to occupy the project site and have a low potential to occur onsite. Further, as the proposed widening alignment would occur within the existing paved roadway and landscaped areas, burrowing owl are presumed absent, and no impacts to this species are anticipated; however, as stated above under Impact 3.4(a), a burrowing owl pre - construction clearance survey is required within seven days prior to ground disturbance, in accordance with the MSHCP, to ensure burrowing owl remain absent from the project site. Implementation of Mitigation Measure BIO -1 would reduce potential project impacts on burrowing owl in this regard to less than significant. Therefore, the proposed project would not conflict with the provisions of an adopted habitat conservation plan, natural community conservation plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan. No impact would occur. May 2017 41 InitialStudy/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening 3.5 CULTURAL RESOURCES 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES - Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in Section 15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to Section 15064.5? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? ❑ Q ❑ ❑ ❑ E 0 0 0 LJ 0 0 0 E 0 0 Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5? Determination: Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. A cultural resources assessment, including a site visit conducted on August 22, 2016, was prepared for the project (BCR Consulting 2016). Refer to Appendix C, Cultural Resources Assessment, for the full report. Historic resources generally consist of buildings, structures, improvements, and remnants associated with a significant historic event or person(s) and/or having a historically significant style, design, or achievement. Damage to or demolition of such resources is typically considered to be a significant impact. Impacts to historic resources can occur through direct impacts, such as destruction or removal, and through indirect impacts, such as a change in the setting of a historic resource. BCR Consulting conducted a records search at the Eastern Information Center (EIC) in August 2016, the local clearinghouse for cultural resource records. This archival research reviewed the status of all recorded historic and prehistoric cultural resources, and survey and excavation reports completed within one mile of the project site. Additional resources reviewed included the National Register of Historic Places, the California Register of Historical Resources, and documents and inventories published by the California Office of Historic Preservation. These include the lists of California Historical Landmarks, California Points of Historical Interest, Listing of National Register Properties, and Inventory of Historic Structures. The records search conducted at the EIC identified 27 cultural resource studies that have been conducted in the project area, four of which included the project site. The records search indicated that 26 cultural resources have been recorded within one mile of the project site. No cultural resources have been recorded within the project site boundaries; however, four cultural resources (including three prehistoric isolates and one prehistoric site with a historic component) have been recorded adjacent to the project site. A summary of the records search is included in Appendix C. Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 42 May 2017 Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES - Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in Section 15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to Section 15064.5? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? ❑ Q ❑ ❑ ❑ E 0 0 0 LJ 0 0 0 E 0 0 Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5? Determination: Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. A cultural resources assessment, including a site visit conducted on August 22, 2016, was prepared for the project (BCR Consulting 2016). Refer to Appendix C, Cultural Resources Assessment, for the full report. Historic resources generally consist of buildings, structures, improvements, and remnants associated with a significant historic event or person(s) and/or having a historically significant style, design, or achievement. Damage to or demolition of such resources is typically considered to be a significant impact. Impacts to historic resources can occur through direct impacts, such as destruction or removal, and through indirect impacts, such as a change in the setting of a historic resource. BCR Consulting conducted a records search at the Eastern Information Center (EIC) in August 2016, the local clearinghouse for cultural resource records. This archival research reviewed the status of all recorded historic and prehistoric cultural resources, and survey and excavation reports completed within one mile of the project site. Additional resources reviewed included the National Register of Historic Places, the California Register of Historical Resources, and documents and inventories published by the California Office of Historic Preservation. These include the lists of California Historical Landmarks, California Points of Historical Interest, Listing of National Register Properties, and Inventory of Historic Structures. The records search conducted at the EIC identified 27 cultural resource studies that have been conducted in the project area, four of which included the project site. The records search indicated that 26 cultural resources have been recorded within one mile of the project site. No cultural resources have been recorded within the project site boundaries; however, four cultural resources (including three prehistoric isolates and one prehistoric site with a historic component) have been recorded adjacent to the project site. A summary of the records search is included in Appendix C. Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 42 May 2017 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening A field survey was also conducted by BCR Consulting in August 2016. The survey did not record any historical resources, including historic -period buildings, within the project site boundaries. However, the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians has indicated that the project site is near the Luiseno Ancestral Origin Landscape Traditional Cultural Property, (National Park Service, National Register listing 14000851, posted on the NPS website under the week on November 28, 2014). The Origin Landscape is both a historic resource (as it is listed on both the National and California Registers), and a tribal cultural resource (TCR); refer to Section 3.17, Tribal Cultural Resources, below. As the Pechanga Tribe has identified Traditional Cultural Resources near the project site, Mitigation Measures CR -1 through CR -7 are proposed. Mitigation Measures CR -1 through CR -7 require the presence of an archaeological monitor and Pechanga Tribal monitor during all project -related ground disturbance activities. With adherence to Mitigation Measures CR -1 through CR -7, the project would not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in CEQA Guidelines Section 15064. No impact would occur in this regard. CR -1 CR -2 CR -3 CR -4 A professional archaeological monitor shall be present to monitor all ground - disturbing activities associated with the project. The archaeological monitor shall work under the direct supervision of a Cultural Resource Professional that meets the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualification Standards for Archaeology (U.S. Department of Interior, 2012) and as approved by the City of Temecula to provide archaeological expertise in carrying out all mitigation measures related to archaeological resources (Mitigation Measures CR -2, CR -3 and CR -5). The qualified archaeologist, or an archaeologist working under the direction of the qualified archaeologist, along with a representative designated by the Pechanga Tribe, shall conduct a pre -construction cultural resources worker sensitivity training to inform construction personnel of the types of cultural resources that may be encountered, and to bring awareness to personnel of actions to be taken in the event of a cultural resources discovery. The City shall ensure that construction personnel are made available for and attend the training and shall retain documentation demonstrating attendance. Prior to the start of ground -disturbing activities, the qualified archaeologist shall designate an archaeological monitor to observe ground -disturbing activities, including but not limited to, brush clearance and grubbing, grading, trenching, excavation, and the construction of fencing and access roads, in consultation with the Pechanga tribal monitor. If ground -disturbing activities occur simultaneously in two or more areas located more than 500 feet apart, additional archaeological monitors may be required. The archaeological monitor shall keep daily logs. After monitoring has been completed, the qualified archaeologist shall prepare a monitoring report that details the results of monitoring activities, which shall be submitted to the City, Pechanga Tribe, and to the EIC at the University of California, Riverside. At least 30 days prior to the start of any ground disturbing activity, the City shall contact the Pechanga Tribe of grading, excavation and the monitoring program, and to coordinate with the Pechanga Tribe to develop a Cultural Resources Treatment and Monitoring Agreement (Agreement). The Agreement shall address the treatment of known cultural resources; the designation, responsibilities, and participation of Pechanga Tribal monitors during grading, excavation and all ground disturbing activities; project grading and development scheduling; terms of compensation for May 2017 43 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening the monitors; and treatment and final disposition of any cultural resources, sacred sites, and human remains discovered on the site. The Pechanga Tribal monitor shall monitor observe ground -disturbing activities, including but not limited to, brush clearance and grubbing, grading, trenching, excavation, and the construction of fencing and access roads, in consultation with the archaeological monitor. If ground -disturbing activities occur simultaneously in two or more areas located more than 500 feet apart, additional archaeological monitors may be required. The Pechanga tribal monitor shall keep daily Togs. If ground -disturbing activities occur simultaneously in two or more locations, additional Pechanga tribal monitors may be required. CR -5 If inadvertent discoveries of subsurface archaeological/cultural resources are made during ground -disturbing activities, the applicant, the qualified archaeologist, and the Pechanga Tribe shall assess the significance of such resources and shall meet and confer regarding the mitigation for such resources. Pursuant to PRC Section 21083.2(b) avoidance is the preferred method of preservation for archaeological resources. PRC Section 21084.3 further requires that agencies shall avoid damaging effects to tribal cultural resources, if feasible. If the City, the qualified archaeologist, and the Pechanga Tribe cannot agree on the significance or the mitigation for such resources, these issues will be presented to the City Planning Director for decision. The City Planning Director shall make the determination based on the provisions of the CEQA with respect to archaeological resources and shall take into account the religious beliefs, customs, and practices of the Pechanga Tribe. Notwithstanding any other rights available under the law, the decision of the City Planning Director shall be appealable to the City Planning Commission and/or City Council. CR -6 The City shall relinquish ownership of all cultural resources, including sacred items, burial goods and all archaeological artifacts that are recovered as a result of project implementation to the Pechanga Tribe for proper treatment and disposition as outlined in the Agreement (Mitigation Measure CUL -4). CR -7 All sacred sites, should they be encountered within the project area, shall be avoided and preserved as the preferred mitigation, if feasible. b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5? Determination: Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. Archaeological sites are locations that contain resources associated with former human activities and may contain such resources as human skeletal remains, waste from tool manufacture, tool concentrations, and/or discoloration or accumulation of soil or food remains. The records search conducted at the EIC identified 27 cultural resource studies that have been conducted in the project area, four of which included the project site. Through such studies, 26 cultural resources have been recorded within one mile of the project site. No cultural resources have been recorded within the project site boundaries; however, four cultural resources (including three prehistoric isolates and one prehistoric site with a historic component) have been recorded adjacent to the project site. A summary of the records search is included in Appendix C. Although no known material cultural resources are present on the project site, the potential for unknown subsurface resources does exist, in particular due to the sensitivity of the area and previous identification of material resources. Further, the project is adjacent to a landscape (as Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 44 May 2017 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening discussed further below); however, given the existing roadway and minimal additional impacts from the project, the impact is considered to be Tess than significant, with the mitigation measures as outlined below. Therefore, project -related ground disturbing and construction activities would have the potential to adversely affect such unknown resources. To ensure that an adverse change in the significance of a cultural resource does not occur, Mitigation Measure CR -1 through CR -7 requires the presence of an archaeological monitor and Pechanga Tribal monitor during all project -related ground disturbance activities. With incorporation of Mitigation Measure CR -1 through CR -7, impacts would be reduced to less than significant. MITIGATION MEASURES CR -1 CR -2 CR -3 CR -4 CR -5 CR -6 CR -7 Refer to Impact 3.5(a), above. Refer to Impact 3.5(a), above. Refer to Impact 3.5(a), above. Refer to Impact 3.5(a), above. Refer to Impact 3.5(a), above. Refer to Impact 3.5(a), above. Refer to Impact 3.5(a), above. c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? Determination: Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. Paleontological resources are the preserved fossilized remains of plants and animals. Fossils and traces of fossils are preserved in sedimentary rock units, particularly fine- to medium -grained marine, lake, and stream deposits, such as limestone, siltstone, sandstone, or shale, and in ancient soils (paleosols). Such resources are also found in coarse-grained sediments, such as conglomerates or coarse alluvium sediments. Additionally, fossils are rarely preserved in igneous or metamorphic rock units. Fossils may occur throughout a sedimentary unit and are more likely to be preserved subsurface, where they have not been damaged or destroyed by previous ground disturbance, amateur collecting, or natural causes such as erosion. In contrast, archaeological and historic resources are often recognized by surface evidence of their presence. According to the City's General Plan EIR (Section 5.5, Cultural Resources), sedimentary rock units that contain significant fossil records dating back three million years are present within the Temecula Valley region. Portions of City's Planning Area are known to support archaeological and paleontological resources. Implementation of the City's General Plan will result in both new development on undeveloped lands, as well as infill development within focus areas located throughout the Planning Area. The General Plan Open Space Element identifies the goal to preserve or salvage potential archeological and paleontological resources with future development through discretionary review and mitigation monitoring, as well as to maintain an inventory of areas with known archaeological/paleontological sensitivity, and historic sites in the Planning Area; however, unknown paleontological resources may be unearthed during excavation and grading activities for specific projects. If previously undiscovered artifacts or remains are uncovered during excavation or construction activities, impacts would be considered significant. Mitigation Measure CR -8 requires the presence of an archaeological monitor during grading and specifies instructions in the event a paleontological resource is discovered. With implementation of Mitigation Measure CR -8, impacts to paleontological resources would be reduced to less than significant levels. May 2017 45 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening MITIGATION MEASURES CR -8 Prior to Grading Permit issuance and in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan Implementation Measure OS -26, Development Review Process, the City shall retain a qualified paleontologist to observe grading and deep excavation activities in areas where the probable presence of paleontological resources is identified. In the event that paleontological resources are inadvertently discovered during ground disturbing activities, the qualified paleontologist shall document the discovery as appropriate, evaluate the potential resource, and assess the significance of the find under the criteria set forth in CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5. If the fossil or fossil -bearing deposit are discovered during construction, excavations within 50 feet of the find shall be temporarily halted or diverted until the discovery is examined by the qualified paleontologist (in accordance with Society of Vertebrate Paleontology standards, Society of Vertebrate Paleontology, 1995). The paleontologist shall notify the appropriate agencies to determine procedures that would be followed before construction is allowed to resume at the location of the find. If the City determines that avoidance is not feasible, the paleontologist shall prepare an excavation plan for mitigating the effect of the Project on the qualities that make the resource significant (Paleontological Resources Mitigation Program). The Paleontological Resources Mitigation Program shall be submitted to the City for review and approval, prior to the resumption of grading activities at the location of the find. d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? Determination: Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. It is not anticipated that human remains or informal cemetery areas are present on the project site; however, ground -disturbing activities such as grading or excavation have the potential to disturb human remains. If human remains are found, those remains would require proper treatment, in accordance with applicable laws. California Public Resources Code Section 5097.98 and Health and Safety Code Sections 7050.5-7055 describe the general provisions regarding human remains, including the requirements if any human remains are accidentally discovered during project construction. As required by State law, procedures set forth in Section 5097.98 of the California Public Resources Code would be implemented, including notification of the County Coroner, notification of the Native American Heritage Commission, and consultation with the individual identified by the Native American Heritage Commission to be the "most likely descendant." If human remains are found during excavation, Mitigation Measure CR -9 requires that construction activities be halted in the vicinity of the find and any area that is reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent remains until the County Coroner has been notified, and the remains have been investigated, and if determined to be Native American, the appropriate state law process has been followed, and appropriate recommendations have been made for the treatment and disposition of such remains by the Most Likely Descendant. Compliance with existing State regulations, which detail the appropriate actions necessary in the event human remains are encountered, in addition to Mitigation Measure CR -9, would ensure that potential impacts on undiscovered human remains are less than significant. MITIGATION MEASURES CR -9 Consistent with State CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5, Subdivision (e), in the event of an accidental discovery or recognition of any human remains, the County Coroner Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 46 May 2017 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening shall be notified and construction activities at the affected work site shall be halted. Further, pursuant to PRC Section 5097.98(b) remains shall be left in place and free from disturbance until a final decision as to the treatment and disposition has been made. If the remains are found to be Native American, the County Coroner shall notify the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) within 24 hours. The NAHC shall immediately notify the most likely descendant(s) under Public Resources Code Section 5097.98, and the descendants must make recommendations or state their preference for treatment within 48 hours of being granted access to the site as identified in Agreement described in Mitigation Measure CR -4. May 2017 47 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening 3.6 GEOLOGY AND SOILS 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS -Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction? iv) Landslides? b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on - or offsite landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? ❑ 0 Q 0 O 0 Q 0 O 0 0 Q o Ei 0 0 o 0 IJ ❑ o 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. Determination: Less than Significant Impact. The City of Temecula, like the rest of Southern California, is located in a seismically active region as the result of being located near the active margin between the North American and Pacific tectonic plates. Several major faults exist in the region and have the potential to cause damage in the City. The project site is located within an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone (California Department of Conservation 1990). According to the City of Temecula's Geographic Information System, the most significant known active fault capable of seismic Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 48 May 2017 Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS -Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction? iv) Landslides? b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on - or offsite landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? ❑ 0 Q 0 O 0 Q 0 O 0 0 Q o Ei 0 0 o 0 IJ ❑ o 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. Determination: Less than Significant Impact. The City of Temecula, like the rest of Southern California, is located in a seismically active region as the result of being located near the active margin between the North American and Pacific tectonic plates. Several major faults exist in the region and have the potential to cause damage in the City. The project site is located within an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone (California Department of Conservation 1990). According to the City of Temecula's Geographic Information System, the most significant known active fault capable of seismic Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 48 May 2017 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening ground shaking that could impact the project vicinity is the Wolf Valley Fault, which bisects Pechanga Parkway at Casino Drive South. Additionally, the Elsinore Fault(s) trend northwest - southeast approximately 0.5 mile to the north and approximately 0.25 mile to the south. The Murrieta Creek Fault also parallels Pechanga Parkway approximately 0.25 mile to the south (City of Temecula Geographic Information System 2016). The project does not include habitable structures and is limited to the construction of roadway improvements and associated appurtenant aboveground structures (i.e. sound wall, storm drain, sewer and water, traffic signals, street lighting, raised median, and repaving activities). These improvements are not particularly at -risk to earthquake -induced damage, and would not substantially increase the potential for human loss, injury, or death as a result of fault rupture. Development of the proposed project would include minor grading and/or other ground - disturbing activities to allow for the proposed roadway improvements. Project compliance with applicable local seismic -related requirements would reduce the potential for impacts to occur from the exposure of people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects as the result of fault rupture. The City of Temecula has prepared the Engineering and Construction Manual (last amended January 2013) to define the administrative procedures and technical requirements necessary to implement the provisions of Temecula Municipal Code Title 18 (Construction, Grading, and Encroachment). The Engineering and Construction Manual provides detailed information to regulate construction, grading, and encroachment within public rights-of-way, including roadway design standards that would be applied to the proposed project. Project conformance with the design measures provided in the Engineering and Construction Manual, as well as any other applicable seismic -related requirements, would ensure that project impacts relative to potential rupture of a known earthquake fault remain less than significant. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? Determination: Less than Significant Impact. As discussed in Impact 3.6(a)(i) above, the project site is traversed by the Wolf Valley Fault and is in close proximity to the Elsinore Fault and Murrieta Creek Fault, all of which have the potential to result in strong seismic ground shaking. Therefore, the project site could be exposed to ground shaking during seismic events. Roadway installation and the design and engineering of the roadway would be required to comply with the all City requirements in place to shield infrastructure from the effects of seismic ground shaking, including those identified under the City of Temecula Engineering and Construction Manual, as well as the goals and policies outlined in the City of Temecula General Plan Public Safety Element. Additionally, all structures would be constructed in compliance with the existing seismic safety regulations of the California Uniform Building Code. As described above, the project does not involve the construction of aboveground habitable structures, and its implementation would not increase the potential for human loss, injury, or death. As such, impacts would be less than significant. iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction? Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Liquefaction and seismically -induced settlement or ground failure is generally related to strong seismic shaking events where the groundwater table occurs at a relatively shallow depth (generally within 50 feet of the ground surface) or where lands are underlain by loose, cohesionless deposits. Liquefaction generally results in the loss of shear strength of a soil, which occurs due to the increase of pore water pressure caused by the rearrangement of soil May 2017 49 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening particles induced by shaking or vibration. During liquefaction, soil strata typically behave similar to a heavy fluid. According to the City of Temecula Geographic Information System, and as shown on Figure 5.6-1, Seismic Hazards, of the City's General Plan EIR, the project site is highly susceptible to liquefaction. Due to the nature of the project, settlement as the result of liquefaction following a strong seismic event would likely be minimal. Placement and compaction of any fill material for the proposed structures must be performed in accordance with the City of Temecula grading standards and to the satisfaction of a qualified geotechnical engineer, as referenced in the updated geotechnical report; refer to Appendix D. In addition, the project would be required to comply with all applicable General Plan policies and local codes and regulations regulating the effects of liquefaction, including those identified under the City's Engineering and Construction Manual. The type of use proposed (roadway improvements) would not significantly expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving seismic ground failure. A less than significant impact would occur in this regard. iv) Landslides? Determination: No Impact. As shown on Figure 5.6-1 of the City of Temecula General Plan EIR, potential landslide conditions exist in the hillside areas of southwest Temecula with slopes greater that 15 percent. The proposed project site is not located in an area conducive to landslides, as described in the City of Temecula General Plan EIR. Further, the project does not propose the construction of buildings for human occupancy, and the relatively uniform topography of the site and adjacent land would not be conducive or prone to landslides. Therefore, no impact would occur. b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? Determination: Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. Soil erosion is most prevalent in unconsolidated alluvium and surficial soils and in areas that have slopes. The roadway improvements proposed under the project would occur in a generally flat area, thus the potential for substantial soil erosion would be minimal. Nonetheless, grading and trenching during the project's construction phase would displace soils and temporarily increase the potential for soils to be subject to wind and water erosion. Construction activities would include site mobilization, demolition, minor grading, installation activities (sound wall, storm drain, sewer and water, traffic signals, street lighting, raised median, sound wall), and repaving activities (repaving, striping). To reduce potential impacts related to the loss of topsoil, the project would be required to meet City of Temecula grading standards, as required. Further, the project would require preparation of a stormwater pollution prevention plan (SWPPP) for approval by the City prior to grading. The SWPPP would identify site-specific best management practices (BMPs) to be implemented with the project in order to prevent erosion, minimize siltation from impacting downstream water bodies, and protect water quality (Mitigation Measure GEO-1). In addition, construction of the proposed project would be required to demonstrate compliance with the recommendations outlined in the geotechnical report prepared for the proposed improvements; refer to Appendix D. In addition, grading operations, land -clearing, loading, stockpiling, landscaping, and construction haul routes would be required to comply with SCAQMD Rule 403, Fugitive Dust Emissions. Project implementation would occur in compliance with such plans and grading standards, and in Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 50 May 2017 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening accordance with the requirements of Mitigation Measure GEO-1. With such measures, project impacts with regard to soil erosion or the loss of topsoil would be less than significant. MITIGATION MEASURES GEO-1 Prior to commencement of any project grading activities, and in accordance with National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) requirements, the City of Temecula shall prepare a stormwater pollution prevention plan (SWPPP) for approval by the City's Public Works Department. The SWPPP shall include relevant best management practices (BMPs) in order to minimize soil erosion and water quality impacts during project construction. c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in an onsite or offsite landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse? Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Lateral spreading is a phenomenon in which large blocks of intact, non -liquefied soil move down a slope on a liquefied soil layer. Lateral spreading is often a regional event. For lateral spreading to occur, the liquefiable soil zone must be laterally continuous, unconstrained laterally, and free to move along sloping ground. Due to the nature of the proposed improvements, project installation is not anticipated to induce lateral spreading at the site. As noted above, while liquefaction risk is present on the project site, all improvements would be designed and constructed in conformance with the CBC seismic engineering standards, as well as with City of Temecula grading standards, as applicable. Although the roadway (and associated) improvements would be located within a designated Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone, the proposed project would not change the existing land use or include the provision of structures for human occupancy. As such, with implementation of the above-mentioned preventive measures that would be undertaken during project design, impacts associated with ground failure, including landslides, liquefaction, lateral spreading, and settlement, are considered to be less than significant with project compliance with the CBC and applicable local codes and construction standards. Refer also to Impacts 3.6(a)(ii) through 3.6(a)(iv), above, for additional discussion. With such measures, project impacts relative to unstable geologic units or soils would be less than significant. d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-8 of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Expansive soils are those that undergo volume changes as moisture content fluctuates, swelling substantially when wet or shrinking when dry. Soil expansion can damage structures by cracking foundations, causing settlement, and distorting structural elements. Project construction would be implemented based on the recommendations of a geotechnical engineer, as part of the final design process. Further, the project involves the construction of roadway infrastructure and does not include habitable structures that would increase the potential for substantial risk to life or property. As applicable, any import fill used would consist of granular materials with a "low" expansion potential (El of 50 or less) and would be tested by the project geologist prior to use to evaluate its suitability as fill material, consistent with the recommendations of the geotechnical report. Project conformance with such measures would ensure that impacts relative to expansive soils would be less than significant. May 2017 51 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration e) City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? Determination: No Impact. As a roadway improvement project, the installation of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems is not proposed, and wastewater disposal would not be required. No impact would occur. Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 52 May 2017 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening 3.7 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS 7. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS — Would the project: a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? ❑ ❑ ❑ Would the project: a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? Determination: Less than Significant Impact. There is scientific consensus that the contribution of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions into the atmosphere is resulting in the change of the global climate. The global average temperature is expected to increase relative to the 1986-2005 period by 0.3 to 4.8 degrees Celsius (°C) (0.5-8.6 degrees Fahrenheit [°F]) by the end of the twenty-first century (2081-2100), depending on future GHG emission scenarios (IPCC 2013). According to the California Natural Resources Agency, temperatures in California are projected to increase 2.7°F above 2000 averages by 2050 and, depending on emission levels, 4.1-8.6°F by 2100 (CNRA 2012). Physical conditions beyond average temperatures could be indirectly affected by the accumulation of GHG emissions. For example, changes in weather patterns resulting from increases in global average temperature are expected to result in a decreased volume of precipitation falling as snow in California and an overall reduction in snowpack in the Sierra Nevada. The Global Warming Solutions Act, also known as Assembly Bill (AB) 32, is a legal mandate requiring that Statewide GHG emissions be reduced to 1990 levels by 2020. Construction of the proposed project would generate GHG emissions. During project construction, GHGs would be emitted through the operation of construction equipment and from worker and vendor vehicles, each of which typically uses fossil -based fuels to operate. The combustion of fossil -based fuels creates GHG emissions such as carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), and nitrous oxide (N20). Furthermore, CH4 is emitted during the fueling of heavy equipment. Addressing GHG generation impacts requires an agency to make a determination as to what constitutes a significant impact. The amendments to the CEQA Guidelines specifically allow lead agencies to determine thresholds of significance that illustrate the extent of an impact and are a basis from which to apply mitigation measures. This means that each agency is left to determine whether a project's GHG emissions will have a "significant" impact on the environment. The guidelines direct that agencies are to use "careful judgment" and "make a good -faith effort, based to the extent possible on scientific and factual data, to describe, calculate or estimate" the project's GHG emissions (14 California Code of Regulations Section 15064.4(a)). A number of expert agencies throughout the State have drafted or adopted varying threshold approaches and guidelines for analyzing operational GHG emissions in CEQA documents. The different thresholds include (1) compliance with a qualified GHG reduction strategy, (2) performance-based reductions, (3) numeric "bright -line" thresholds, and (4) efficiency -based May 2017 53 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Incorporated Less Than Significant ificant Impact No Impact 7. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS — Would the project: a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? ❑ ❑ ❑ Would the project: a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? Determination: Less than Significant Impact. There is scientific consensus that the contribution of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions into the atmosphere is resulting in the change of the global climate. The global average temperature is expected to increase relative to the 1986-2005 period by 0.3 to 4.8 degrees Celsius (°C) (0.5-8.6 degrees Fahrenheit [°F]) by the end of the twenty-first century (2081-2100), depending on future GHG emission scenarios (IPCC 2013). According to the California Natural Resources Agency, temperatures in California are projected to increase 2.7°F above 2000 averages by 2050 and, depending on emission levels, 4.1-8.6°F by 2100 (CNRA 2012). Physical conditions beyond average temperatures could be indirectly affected by the accumulation of GHG emissions. For example, changes in weather patterns resulting from increases in global average temperature are expected to result in a decreased volume of precipitation falling as snow in California and an overall reduction in snowpack in the Sierra Nevada. The Global Warming Solutions Act, also known as Assembly Bill (AB) 32, is a legal mandate requiring that Statewide GHG emissions be reduced to 1990 levels by 2020. Construction of the proposed project would generate GHG emissions. During project construction, GHGs would be emitted through the operation of construction equipment and from worker and vendor vehicles, each of which typically uses fossil -based fuels to operate. The combustion of fossil -based fuels creates GHG emissions such as carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), and nitrous oxide (N20). Furthermore, CH4 is emitted during the fueling of heavy equipment. Addressing GHG generation impacts requires an agency to make a determination as to what constitutes a significant impact. The amendments to the CEQA Guidelines specifically allow lead agencies to determine thresholds of significance that illustrate the extent of an impact and are a basis from which to apply mitigation measures. This means that each agency is left to determine whether a project's GHG emissions will have a "significant" impact on the environment. The guidelines direct that agencies are to use "careful judgment" and "make a good -faith effort, based to the extent possible on scientific and factual data, to describe, calculate or estimate" the project's GHG emissions (14 California Code of Regulations Section 15064.4(a)). A number of expert agencies throughout the State have drafted or adopted varying threshold approaches and guidelines for analyzing operational GHG emissions in CEQA documents. The different thresholds include (1) compliance with a qualified GHG reduction strategy, (2) performance-based reductions, (3) numeric "bright -line" thresholds, and (4) efficiency -based May 2017 53 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening thresholds. The California Supreme Court decision in the Centers for Biological Diversity et al. v. California Department of Fish and Wildlife, the Newhall Land and Farming Company (November 30, 2015, Case No. S217763) confirmed that when an "agency chooses to rely completely on a single quantitative method to justify a no -significance finding, CEQA demands the agency research and document the quantitative parameters essential to that method." As noted earlier, AB 32 is a legal mandate requiring that statewide GHG emissions be reduced to 1990 levels by 2020. Efficiency -based thresholds represent the rate of emission reductions needed to achieve a fair share of California's GHG emissions reduction target established under AB 32. In adopting AB 32, the Legislature determined the necessary GHG reductions for the State to make in order to sufficiently offset its contribution to the cumulative climate change problem to reach 1990 levels. AB 32 is the only legally mandated requirement for the reduction of GHGs. As such, compliance with AB 32 is the current adopted basis upon which an agency can base its significance threshold for evaluating a project's GHG impacts; however, it is acknowledged that Executive Orders S-03-05 and B-30-15, Senate Bill (SB) 375, and the recently signed legislation of SB 32 will ultimately result in GHG emissions reduction targets for CEQA projects for years beyond 2020. The SCAQMD has not announced when staff is expecting to present a finalized version of its GHG thresholds to the governing board. On September 28, 2010, the SCAQMD recommended an interim screening level numeric "bright -line" threshold of 3,000 metric tons per year of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2eq)6 for all non -industrial projects. These efficiency -based thresholds were developed as part of the SCAQMD GHG CEQA Significance Threshold Working Group. This working group was formed to assist SCAQMD's efforts to develop a GHG significance threshold and is composed of a wide variety of stakeholders including the State Office of Planning and Research (OPR), CARB, the Attorney General's Office, a variety of city and county planning departments in the Basin, various utilities such as sanitation and power companies throughout the Basin, industry groups, and environmental and professional organizations. The numeric "bright line" was developed to be consistent with CEQA requirements for developing significance thresholds, is supported by substantial evidence, and provides guidance to CEQA practitioners with regard to determining whether GHG emissions from a proposed project are significant. Emissions resulting from implementation of the proposed project have been quantified and the quantified emissions are compared with the SCAQMD GHG threshold. The anticipated GHG emissions during project construction are shown in Table 3.7-1, Greenhouse Gas Emissions — Project Operations (Metric Tons per Year). Construction emissions are amortized over 30 years per SCAQMD guidance.' Table 3.7-1: Greenhouse Gas Emissions — Project Operations (Metric Tons per Year Emissions Source CO2eq Annual Roadway Construction emissions amortized over 30 years 2.2 SCAQMD Potentially Significant Impact Threshold 3,000 Exceed SCAQMD Threshold? No Source: CaIEEMod, version 2016.3.1. See Appendix A Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Data. 6 Carbon Dioxide Equivalent (CO2eq) — A metric measure used to compare the emissions from various greenhouse gases based upon their global warming potential. ' The project lifetime is based on the standard 30 -year assumption of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (South Coast Air Quality Management District, Minutes for the GHG CEQA Significance Threshold Stakeholder Working Group #13, August 26, 2009). Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 54 May 2017 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening Similar to the emission of criteria air pollutants discussed above, none of the components of the proposed project would include the provision of new permanent stationary or mobile sources of GHG emissions. Therefore, by its nature, the project would not generate quantifiable GHG emissions from long-term operations. The project does not propose any new buildings and therefore no permanent source of stationary source or energy source GHG emissions. In addition, once completed, the project would not result in a permanent increase in traffic. The proposed project would accommodate existing and predicted traffic demands and uphold the City of Temecula's goals to reduce traffic congestion, improve safety on roadways, and provide better access to regional transportation routes. The project would be designed to accommodate additional traffic volumes and would not directly generate new traffic or increase the number of vehicles along the roadway. Additionally, the project improves a non -motorized transportation option by providing a sidewalk for pedestrians. Traffic conditions after the project is constructed are expected to be the same as or slightly better than existing traffic conditions. Therefore, the project would not result in new permanent stationary or mobile sources of GHG emissions. As depicted in Table 3.7-1, GHG emissions projected to result from construction (amortized over 30 years per SCAQMD guidance) of the proposed project would not exceed the SCAQMD greenhouse gas threshold. The impact is therefore considered less than significant. b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Although the City of Temecula has not adopted a GHG reduction plan, the project would be below the SCAQMD's GHG threshold (see Impact 3.7(a) above). Furthermore, as previously mentioned, AB 32 is the legal mandate requiring that Statewide GHG emissions be reduced to 1990 levels by 2020. In addition, Statewide goals for GHG reductions in the years beyond 2020 have been recently codified into State law with the passage of Senate Bill (SB) 32. Signed into law on September 2016, SB 32 codifies the 2030 target in the recent Executive Order B 30 15 (40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030). The bill authorizes the State board to adopt an interim GHG emissions level target to be achieved by 2030. SB 32 states that the intent is for the Legislature and appropriate agencies to adopt complementary policies which ensure that the long-term emissions reductions advance specified criteria. At the time of writing this Initial Study, however, no specific policies or emissions reduction mechanisms have been established. SCAG's 2016-2040 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS), adopted April 7, 2016, is a long-range visioning plan that balances future mobility and housing needs with economic, environmental, and public health goals. The RTP/SCS embodies a collective vision for the region's future and is developed with input from local governments, county tra nsportation commissions, tribal governments, nonprofit organizations, businesses, and local stakeholders in Imperial, Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, and Ventura Counties. The RTP/SCS establishes GHG emissions goals for automobiles and light-duty trucks for 2020 and 2035, and establishes an overall GHG target for the region consistent with both the target date of AB 32 (2020) and the post -2020 GHG reduction goals of SB 32. The 2016 RTP/SCS contains over 4,000 transportation projects, including highway improvements, railroad grade separations, bicycle lanes, new transit hubs, and replacement bridges. These future investments were included in county plans developed by the six -county transportation commissions and seek to reduce traffic bottlenecks, improve the efficiency of the region's network, and expand mobility choices. The RTP/SCS is an important planning document for the region, allowing project sponsors to qualify for federal funding. In addition, the RTP/SCS is supported by a combination of May 2017 55 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening transportation and land use strategies that help the region achieve State GHG emission reduction goals and federal Clean Air Act requirements, preserve open space areas, improve public health and roadway safety, support the vital goods movement industry, and utilize resources more efficiently. The proposed project's consistency with the RTP/SCS goals is analyzed in detail in Table 3.7-2, Consistency with SCAG's Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy Goals. As shown, the project would not result in conflict with RTP/SCS goals. Table 3.7-2: Consistency with SCAG's Regional Transportation Plan/ Sustainable Communities Strategy Goals SCAG Goals Compliance with Goal GOAL 1: Align the plan investments and policies with improving regional economic development and competitiveness. Not Applicable: This is not a project -specific policy and is therefore not applicable. GOAL 2: Maximize mobility and accessibility for all people and goods in the region. Consistent: Improvements to the transportation network in Temecula are developed and maintained to meet the needs of local and regional transportation and to ensure efficient mobility. The objective of the proposed project is to widen Pechanga Parkway from a four lane (110 feet width) facility to six lanes (134 feet width) in order to accommodate existing and predicted traffic demands and uphold the City of Temecula's goals to reduce traffic congestion, improve safety on roadways, and provide better access to regional transportation routes. GOAL 3: Ensure travel safety and reliability for all people and goods in the region. Consistent: All modes of transit in Temecula are required to follow safety standards set by corresponding regulatory documents. Pedestrian walkways and bicycle routes must follow safety precautions and standards established by local (e.g., City of Temecula, County of Riverside) and regional (e.g., SCAG, Caltrans) agencies. Roadways for motorists must follow safety standards established for the local and regional plans. GOAL 4: Preserve and ensure a sustainable regional transportation system. Consistent: The objective of the proposed project is to widen Pechanga Parkway in order to accommodate existing and predicted traffic demands. All new roadway developments and improvements to the existing transportation network must be assessed with some level of traffic analysis (e.g., traffic assessments, traffic impact studies) to determine how the developments would impact existing traffic capacities and to determine the needs for improving future traffic capacities. GOAL 5: Maximize the productivity of our transportation system. Consistent: The local and regional transportation system would be improved and maintained to encourage efficiency and productivity. The City's Public Works Department oversees the improvement and maintenance of all aspects of the public right-of-way on an as -needed basis. GOAL 6: Protect the environment and health of our residents by improving air quality and encouraging active transportation (non -motorized transportation, such as bicycling and walking). Consistent: The City also strives to maximize the protection of the environment and improvement of air quality by encouraging and improving the use of the region's transportation system. The objective of the proposed project is to reduce traffic congestion, improve safety on roadways, and provide better access to regional transportation routes. GOAL 7: Actively encourage and create incentives for energy efficiency, where possible. Not Applicable: This is not a project -specific policy and is therefore not applicable GOAL 8: Encourage land use and growth patterns that facilitate transit and non motorized transportation. Consistent: See response to RTP/SCS Goal 6. Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 56 May 2017 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening Table 3.7-2, continued SCAG Goals Compliance with Goal Consistent: The City of Temecula monitors existing and newly constructed GOAL 9: Maximize the security of roadways and transit routes to determine the adequacy and safety of these our transportation system through systems. Other local and regional agencies (e.g., Riverside County Transportation Department, Caltrans, SCAG) work with the City to manage improved system monitoring, rapid recovery planning, and coordination with other security these systems. Security situations involving roadways and evacuations would be addressed in the County of Riverside's emergency management plans (e.g., Riverside County Operational Area Emergency Operations Plan) developed in agencies. accordance with the State and federal mandated emergency management regulations. Additionally, the City of Temecula Sustainability Plan was adopted in June 2010 to address sustainability and climate change goals. The Sustainability Plan incorporates several goals for reducing greenhouse gases, energy, and water use, planning intelligently for growth, reducing waste, and championing emerging technologies (Temecula 2010, p. 5). The proposed project would be required to demonstrate compliance with the applicable sustainability goals outlined in the Sustainability Plan in order to reduce the City's energy consumption and greenhouse gas production. In order to reduce energy use and promote clean energy production, the Sustainability Plan incorporates the following two goals which would be applicable to the proposed Project: • Reduce energy consumption throughout the community through the use of the latest technology, practices, and programs that support this goal • Support the use of clean energy throughout the community through use of the latest technology, practices, and programs In order to improve mobility throughout the community, the Sustainability Plan offers the following five goals which would be applicable to the proposed Project: • Create a flexible network of alternative modes of transportation • Distribute trip types among all modes of transportation (vehicle, transit, pedestrian, bicycle, etc.) • Maintain physical roadway condition along transit corridors • Improve the transportation system to better connect jobs, housing, schools, shopping and recreational uses As designed, the proposed Project would uphold the applicable Sustainability Goals identified in the Sustainability Plan. Compliance with these goals would ensure that the proposed project does not conflict with an adopted plan, policy, or regulation pertaining to GHGs. As such, the proposed project would not conflict with any applicable plans or policies adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions. Impacts would be less than significant. May 2017 57 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening 3.8 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS 8. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS - Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? g) ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ IJ ❑ ❑ 0 LJ 0 ❑ 0 ❑ IJ ❑ 0 0 0 ❑ 0 0 Q Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? Determination: Less than Significant Impact. The routine transport, use, and disposal of hazardous materials can result in hazards to the public through the potential for accidental release. Such hazards are typically associated with certain types of land uses, such as chemical manufacturing facilities, industrial processes, waste disposal, and storage and distribution facilities. Construction of the proposed project may result in temporary hazards related to transport and use of hazardous materials, including those used for construction vehicle use and maintenance (i.e., diesel fuel, motor oil, etc.). During project construction, contractors would be required to lnitial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 58 May 2017 Potentially Significant lm act P Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Im act p No Impact 8. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS - Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? g) ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ IJ ❑ ❑ 0 LJ 0 ❑ 0 ❑ IJ ❑ 0 0 0 ❑ 0 0 Q Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? Determination: Less than Significant Impact. The routine transport, use, and disposal of hazardous materials can result in hazards to the public through the potential for accidental release. Such hazards are typically associated with certain types of land uses, such as chemical manufacturing facilities, industrial processes, waste disposal, and storage and distribution facilities. Construction of the proposed project may result in temporary hazards related to transport and use of hazardous materials, including those used for construction vehicle use and maintenance (i.e., diesel fuel, motor oil, etc.). During project construction, contractors would be required to lnitial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 58 May 2017 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening uphold standard best management practices to ensure that all hazardous materials are stored, transported, and disposed of in accordance with federal and State law. Conformance with these standards would effectively avoid and minimize significant hazards related to the transport, use, and disposal of hazardous materials and would reduce the project's impacts to less than significant levels. Project operations (roadway corridor) would not involve a land use creating a significant hazard to the environment due to the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials. Operation of the roadway would be similar to that as occurs under existing conditions, but with improved traffic flows and reduced congestion, due to the addition of the two proposed travel lanes. As such, the project would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials. No significant operational impacts would occur. b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Refer to Impact 3.8(a), above. During the short-term excavation and construction period, there is the possibility of accidental release of hazardous substances such as spilling of petroleum-based fuels, lubricants, and other materials used for construction equipment. During construction of the proposed project, contractors would be required to use standard construction safety procedures and controls that would avoid and minimize the potential for accidental release of hazardous substances into the environment. Standard construction best management practices would be observed such that any hazardous materials released are appropriately contained and remediated as required by local, State, and federal law. Conformance with these standards would reduce impacts related to the accidental release of hazardous materials into the environment to less than significant levels. The proposed project would not alter any existing land uses along the affected segment of Pechanga Parkway. Therefore, following project implementation, the roadway would continue to operate as it presently does under current conditions, with exception of the additional travel lanes and other enhancements. The use of limited amounts of hazardous materials (i.e. maintenance vehicles and equipment, oil, gasoline, solvents, etc.) may be required during periodic maintenance activities, as needed; however, such activities would be temporary and typical of similar activities that currently occur along the roadway corridor. The proposed improvements would not result in long-term operational effects related to hazardous materials release. No long-term impacts would occur in this regard. c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Great Oak High School is located approximately 0.6 mile southeast; Helen Hunt Jackson Elementary School is located approximately 0.7 mile to the northeast; Temecula Luiseno Elementary School is located approximately 0.6 mile to the northwest; and, Erle Stanley Gardner Middle School is located approximately 0.4 mile to the north of the site. No schools are located within one-quarter mile of the project site. As stated in Impact 3.8(a), minor quantities of hazardous materials used during project construction would be subject to existing standard best management practices to ensure that all hazardous materials are stored, transported, used, and disposed of in accordance with federal and State law. Operation of the proposed project would not involve the routine use of hazardous May 2017 59 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening materials, and periodic roadway maintenance activities would only require the use of limited quantities of potentially hazardous materials on a short-term, temporary basis when needed. A less than significant impact would occur in this regard. d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? Determination: No Impact. Refer to Impact 3.8(b), above. According to the California Department of Toxic Substances Control (2016) EnviroStor database, there are no listed hazardous sites identified within, or immediately adjacent to, the affected roadway segment. The closest listed site(s) is the (former) Wolf Creek Elementary School and Wolf Creek Middle School, previously located approximately 0.4 mile to the north. No impacts would occur in this regard. e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? Determination: No Impact. French Valley Airport is a Riverside County -owned public -use airport located on State Route (SR) 79, north of Temecula in its sphere of influence, and adjacent to the City of Murrieta's eastern boundary. The Riverside County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan establishes policies applicable to land use compatibility planning in the vicinity of airports throughout Riverside County. The proposed project site is located approximately 7.5 miles southeast of French Valley Airport and is located beyond the French Valley Airport land use influence area. The project site is not located within any compatibility zones identified in the Riverside County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan. Further, as a roadway improvement project, the project does not propose the installation of aboveground structures that could represent a safety hazard to air traffic. Therefore, no impact would occur. For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? Determination: No Impact. According to the Federal Aviation Administration's (2016) airport database, the Billy Joe Airport (private airstrip) is located approximately 3.8 miles northeast of the project site. Due to distance from the project site, and the nature of the roadway improvements proposed (widening and traffic control, circulation, and utility installations), the airport would not be impacted by construction or operation of the proposed project. Therefore, no impact would occur. Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? Determination: Less than Significant Impact. While the proposed project will minimally impact traffic flow during the temporary construction period, it would not conflict with or interfere with emergency evacuation of the project area. Project construction would not substantially interfere with traffic circulation, as emergency access to Pechanga Parkway would be maintained during project construction. The overlying objective of the Pechanga Parkway Widening Project is to incorporate various improvements along Pechanga Parkway. The project would improve traffic flows along the affected corridor by enabling the roadway to accommodate additional vehicles and reducing traffic delays and congestion. As such, the proposed improvements may enhance the roadway's function as an emergency access route, if necessary. No revisions to an adopted emergency plan would be required as a result of the proposed project. Impacts in this regard would be less than significant. f) g) Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 60 May 2017 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Determination: Less than Significant Impact. As indicated in the City's General Plan EIR Hazards and Hazardous Materials section, undeveloped areas, such as in the eastern, southern, and southeastern portions of the Planning Area, have the highest fire danger, due to expansive areas of vegetation that may fuel wildfires. Any new development within the Planning Area would have the potential to expose additional people and structures to wildland fire hazards. The City has adopted the Hazardous Vegetation Ordinance (City of Temecula Municipal Code Title 8 Section 16) which requires every property owner to remove all hazardous or flammable vegetation on their property constituting a fire hazard that may endanger or damage neighboring property. In addition, the Temecula Fire Department and the County of Riverside Fire Department sponsor outreach and awareness programs to educate residents about fire dangers and what they can do to protect themselves and their homes. The General Plan Public Safety Element includes policies and implementation programs that direct the City to reduce the potential for wildfire by concentrating development in previously - developed areas where the risk of wildland fire is lower; to protect hillside areas from expansion of the urban-wildland interface; to encourage residents to plant and maintain drought -resistant, fire retardant landscape species on slopes to reduce the risk of brush fire and soil erosion; and, to work with the City Fire Department to control hazardous vegetation. The segment of Pechanga Parkway affected by the proposed project is generally surrounded by urban development; however, several large undeveloped parcels are present along the corridor to either side of Wolf Valley Road that may be susceptible to wildland or grassland fires. According to the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (2007) Fire and Resource Assessment Program (FRAP) map, the project site is located in an area designated as a local responsibility area (LRA). The City of Temecula Geographic Information System has designated the eastern portion of the project site and its surrounding areas as a high fire area, indicating that the risk for wildfire events to occur is considered to be high,' however, the project would not include the development of any new residential units or habitable structures that would be at risk to wildland fire. Additionally, the undeveloped parcels which border the corridor are subject to routine weed abatement activities in order to minimize their potential risk to wildland fire. Impacts would be less than significant in this regard. B City of Temecula Geographic Information System, High Fire GIS Layer. http://gis.citvoftemecula.org/Html5Viewer/?viewer=Citv0fremecula. Accessed October 20, 2016. May 2017 61 InitialStudy/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening 3.9 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY 9. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY -Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or offsite? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or offsite? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? g) Place housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100 -year flood hazard area structures, which would impede or redirect flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? o Q ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Er ❑ o ❑ LI ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Q ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 62 May 2017 Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 9. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY -Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or offsite? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or offsite? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? g) Place housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100 -year flood hazard area structures, which would impede or redirect flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? o Q ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Er ❑ o ❑ LI ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Q ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 62 May 2017 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? Determination: Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. Surface water quality is subject to federal, State, and local water quality requirements administered and enforced by the US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), the California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB), and the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) with cooperation from each county. The principal law governing pollution of the nation's surface waters is the Clean Water Act (formerly the Federal Water Pollution Control Act). Under the Clean Water Act, regulatory requirements for industrial and municipal dischargers were set, as well as requirements for states to adopt water quality standards. Further, the City of Temecula implements its Jurisdictional Runoff Management Plan (JRMP) which describes the City's urban runoff management programs implemented to comply with the requirements of the National Permit Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) MS4 Permit. The City of Temecula Storm Water Ordinance (City of Temecula Municipal Code Title 8.28) is also implemented to address water quality and outlines the City's NPDES requirements in accordance with the NPDES MS4 Permit. A Water Quality Management Plan was prepared to evaluate potential project effects on hydrology and water quality; refer to Appendix E, Proiect Specific Water Quality Management Plan, prepared by Michael Baker International (August 2016). Project implementation would result in ground disturbance from excavation and grading activities, thereby loosening onsite soils and increasing the potential for erosion and sedimentation deposition, as well as polluted runoff from the site, to occur. Water discharge from project construction may consist of oil and grease, trash, heavy metals, and pathogens, as well as other potential pollutants. These potential discharges can be of concern for development projects, as damage to downstream water bodies can occur. Regulation of discharges into these waters is the responsibility of the SWRCB. Additionally, the proposed project is required to comply with the latest adopted National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit. Compliance with the NPDES Permit would mitigate any project -level impacts to water quality to a level of less than significant. During the grading phase of the proposed project, potential runoff into the surrounding drainage system could cause sediment, oil, and other construction debris to contaminate downstream water bodies. The SWRCB has adopted General Permit number CAS000002-Waste Discharge Requirements for Discharges of Storm Water Runoff Associated with Construction Activity (General Permit). This permit applies to most construction -related runoff within the State. The General Permit requires that all grading permits for projects over one acre are required to submit a SWPPP that outlines Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on the project site to keep all sediment resulting from grading activities retained onsite. Prior to issuance of any grading or building permit, Mitigation Measure GEO-1 requires preparation and submittal of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) to the City's Public Works Department; refer also to Impact 3.6(b), above. Implementation of the SWPPP would reduce potential runoff and pollutants associated with project construction activities to the maximum extent feasible, thereby minimizing potential short-term water quality impacts. Additionally, in accordance with the Riverside County Drainage Area Management Plan (DAMP), City of Temecula Jurisdictional Runoff Management Plan for urban runoff management, and the City of Temecula Storm Water Ordinance, BMPs identified in the WQMP prepared for the project would be implemented during the post-construction/operation phase. The City would be required May 2017 63 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening to demonstrate compliance with each of the recommendations detailed in the study, and other such measure(s) the City deems necessary to reduce potential water quality impacts. With project conformance with applicable federal, State, and local regulations and requirements, as well as through project design and incorporation of the identified BMPs, the project would not violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements. Impacts would be less than significant with mitigation incorporated. MITIGATION MEASURES GEO-1 Refer to Impact 3.6(b) above. b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? Determination: Less than Significant Impact. According to the City's General Plan Open Space/Conservation Element, Rancho California Water District (RCWD) supplies most of the domestic and commercial water to Temecula, paid for by user fees. Water to supply the City is drawn from the Murrieta -Temecula groundwater basin and supplemented with imported water from the Metropolitan Water District (MWD). This aquifer is recharged by underflow, surface flow from the creeks in the area, and by direct precipitation in the valley. The General Plan indicates that in 2005, local groundwater provided 35 percent of the City's water supplies, with 26 percent of supplies being provided by local groundwater under future/buildout conditions. Other water sources include reclaimed water and untreated MWD water used for groundwater recharge. Public water service for the landscaped medians proposed with the project will continue to be provided by RCWD. As such, a portion of the water supply to serve the site would continue to (indirectly) come from local groundwater reserves. Project implementation would not require an increase in RCWD water supplies that would necessitate the provision of a "will serve" letter. As such, increased groundwater pumping would not occur with project implementation. Additionally, long-term operation and maintenance could have the potential to interfere with groundwater recharge, due to an increase in impervious surfaces with development of the proposed project; however, by minimizing the amount of grading and generally maintaining existing drainage patterns, the project would reduce potential adverse effects on local groundwater recharge. Design measures and BMPs would be implemented to ensure that stormwater runoff volumes from the site do not increase. Additionally, project compliance with existing agency regulatory programs, including General Plan goals and policies, would further reduce potential impacts on groundwater supplies. As such, project operations would not substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge, such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level results. Impacts would be less than significant. c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or offsite? Determination: Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. As indicated in the WQMP for the project, existing drainage patterns would be maintained with the project as designed, and therefore, the site does not disperse runoff to adjacent pervious Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 64 May 2017 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening area. As part of the proposed project, improvements would be made to the existing storm drain system to enhance the ability of the system to accommodate runoff during storm events. Construction impacts that may result in on- or offsite erosion or siltation would be minimized to less than significant levels by the implementation of BMPs set forth in the SWPPP (included as Mitigation Measure GEO-1); refer also to Impact 3.6(b), above. Operational impacts related to siltation or erosion would be minimized to less than significant levels by the development and use of standard stormwater drainage features. Therefore, the proposed project is not anticipated to alter the existing drainage pattern of the site and would not result in substantial erosion of siltation onsite or offsite. Impacts are considered to be less than significant with mitigation incorporated. MITIGATION MEASURES GEO-1 Refer to Impact 3.6(b) above. d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or offsite? Determination: Less than Significant Impact. The project site is relatively flat and includes existing paved surfaces associated with Pechanga Parkway. Refer to the response under Impact 3.8(c). The project would result in minimal alterations of the existing drainage pattern of the project site, and would not require traversing any streams or rivers. A less than significant impact related to on- and offsite flooding would occur. e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Refer to Impacts 3.9(a) and 3.9(c), above. The proposed project would result in increased impervious surface area, as the roadway would be widened along the approximate 3,500 foot - long segment. As designed, the project would not increase peak flow rates leaving the site, and discharge velocities would not be increased, as compared to existing conditions. The site is located immediately adjacent to an existing storm drain channel. The project would not cause flooding downstream, nor would it hydraulically impact onsite or downstream storm water infrastructure (runoff discharges to Wolf Valley Creek). Additionally, storm drain improvements are proposed with the project to ensure that such infrastructure can adequately continue to accommodate flows from the site and surrounding areas. Therefore, the project would not contribute runoff water that would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. Impacts would be less than significant. Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? Determination: Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. Refer to Impacts 3.9(a) and 3.9(e) above. With the implementation of BMPs, Mitigation Measure GEO-1, and compliance with established federal, State, and local regulations, the project would not substantially degrade water quality. Thus, a less than significant impact would occur. f) MITIGATION MEASURES GEO-1 Refer to Impact 3.6(b) above. May 2017 65 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration g) City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening Place housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? Determination: No Impact. According to Figure 5.7-1, Flood Hazards and Dam Inundation Areas, of the City's General Plan EIR, the project site is not located within a 100 -year flood zone. As a roadway improvement project, the project would not involve the development of any new residential housing. Therefore, housing units would not be developed or placed within a 100 -year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map. No impact would occur. h) Place within a 100 -year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? Determination: No Impact. See Impact 3.9(g), above. The project site is not located within a 100 -year flood zone. No aboveground structures are proposed with the project. Therefore, implementation of the proposed project would not result in impacts relative to placing structures that would impede or redirect flood flows. No impact would occur. i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Refer to Impacts 3.9(g) and (h), above. In regard to levee or dam failure, the project site is downstream of three reservoirs - Lake Skinner (located approximately 8.5 miles to the north), Diamond Valley Lake Dam (located approximately 13.6 miles to the northeast), and Vail Lake (located approximately 7.5 miles to the northeast). According to Figure 5.7-1, Flood Hazards and Dam Inundation Areas, of the City's General Plan EIR, the project site is not located within a dam inundation area. i) While potential accidental release could impact the project site, as indicated in the City of Temecula General Plan EIR, with incorporation of State and federal regulations, in conjunction with the City of Temecula Multi -Hazard Functional Plan, such impacts would be less than significant. As such, with conformance to such measures, project impacts from flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam are considered to be less than significant. Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? Determination: No Impact. The proposed project site is located approximately 23.5 miles inland from the Pacific Ocean. Local large bodies of water, including Lake Skinner (located approximately 8.5 miles to the north), Diamond Valley Lake Dam (located approximately 13.6 miles to the northeast), and Vail Lake (located approximately 7.5 miles to the northeast), are also distanced from the project site. As such, the possibility for the occurrence of seiche or tsunami impacting the project area is considered to be remote. Further, the 3,500 foot -long affected segment of Pechanga Parkway is located within a generally flat area, and the risk of mudflows and seiche is considered to have a very low risk potential for damage. No impact would occur. Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 66 May 2017 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening 3.10 LAND USE AND PLANNING 10. LAND USE AND PLANNING - Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? Determination: No Impact. According to the City of Temecula General Plan, the parcels adjacent to the project site include Low Medium Density Residential (LM) and Specific Plan (SP) to the north; Tribal Trust Lands (TTL) and SP to the south; LM and TTL to the west; and SP to the east. According to the City of Temecula General Plan Land Use Map, the parcels adjacent to the project site are designated as LM to the north; LM and TTL to the south; LM and TTL to the west; and LM, Medium Density Residential (M), Neighborhood Commercial (NC), and Community Commercial (CC) to the east. The project site, which includes an approximately 3,500 foot segment of the existing roadway (Pechanga Parkway) between Via Gilberto and North Casino Drive, consists of improved road ROW, as well as pedestrian facilities and an existing flood control channel. There are a number of overhead and underground utilities which serve the surrounding area that are located within the existing road right of way. These utilities include a fiber optics cable, electrical utilities, gas, storm drain, sewer, recycled water and domestic water. A number of existing above -ground utility appurtenances (street lighting and signals) would be relocated during the project construction process. Additionally, the flood control facilities that run parallel to Pechanga Parkway would require modification to accommodate the widened roadway. Implementation of the project would in no way divide an established community. All roadway improvements would occur within existing Pechanga Parkway ROW, and no private property acquisition would be required. The project would result in the widening of the roadway and associated improvements for circulation purposes (i.e. median, sidewalk, etc.) within the public ROW. As indicated previously, the affected roadway segment is presently adjoined by a mixture of land uses including residential, commercial, and Tribal lands. The proposed increase in roadway capacity is anticipated to improve area circulation opportunities along Pechanga Parkway to further advance community connectivity. The project would add no additional barriers to any such barriers that may presently exist (i.e. vehicle speeds, multiple travel lanes with median, etc.). As such, the project would not divide an established community, and no impact would occur in this regard. b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or May 2017 67 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 10. LAND USE AND PLANNING - Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? Determination: No Impact. According to the City of Temecula General Plan, the parcels adjacent to the project site include Low Medium Density Residential (LM) and Specific Plan (SP) to the north; Tribal Trust Lands (TTL) and SP to the south; LM and TTL to the west; and SP to the east. According to the City of Temecula General Plan Land Use Map, the parcels adjacent to the project site are designated as LM to the north; LM and TTL to the south; LM and TTL to the west; and LM, Medium Density Residential (M), Neighborhood Commercial (NC), and Community Commercial (CC) to the east. The project site, which includes an approximately 3,500 foot segment of the existing roadway (Pechanga Parkway) between Via Gilberto and North Casino Drive, consists of improved road ROW, as well as pedestrian facilities and an existing flood control channel. There are a number of overhead and underground utilities which serve the surrounding area that are located within the existing road right of way. These utilities include a fiber optics cable, electrical utilities, gas, storm drain, sewer, recycled water and domestic water. A number of existing above -ground utility appurtenances (street lighting and signals) would be relocated during the project construction process. Additionally, the flood control facilities that run parallel to Pechanga Parkway would require modification to accommodate the widened roadway. Implementation of the project would in no way divide an established community. All roadway improvements would occur within existing Pechanga Parkway ROW, and no private property acquisition would be required. The project would result in the widening of the roadway and associated improvements for circulation purposes (i.e. median, sidewalk, etc.) within the public ROW. As indicated previously, the affected roadway segment is presently adjoined by a mixture of land uses including residential, commercial, and Tribal lands. The proposed increase in roadway capacity is anticipated to improve area circulation opportunities along Pechanga Parkway to further advance community connectivity. The project would add no additional barriers to any such barriers that may presently exist (i.e. vehicle speeds, multiple travel lanes with median, etc.). As such, the project would not divide an established community, and no impact would occur in this regard. b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or May 2017 67 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? Determination: Less than Significant Impact. As a roadway, Pechanga Parkway does not have a City of Temecula General Plan land use designation or zoning designation; however, project implementation would require an amendment to the City of Temecula General Plan Circulation Element in order to reflect the Pechanga Parkway's change from Major Arterial to Principal Arterial. As noted in Table 2.5-1, Required Permit Approvals, the City of Temecula would update the General Plan Circulation Element in order to reflect this roadway designation change as part of the project approval process. As such, project implementation would result in less than significant impacts related to conflicts with City of Temecula land use or zoning plans, policies, or regulations. The roadway widening activities proposed under the project could affect adjacent tribal trust land uses under the jurisdiction of the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians; however, any acquisition of easements related to this land would be subject to the regulations issued by the Bureau of Indian Affairs under 25 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 169. In compliance with 25 CFR 169, the City of Temecula would coordinate with the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians to identify the land requirements which would be affected through project implementation, survey the proposed acquisition, identify ownership, and appraise the property. Further, project implementation would benefit circulation opportunities for the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians and would improve accessibility to lands under the Tribe's jurisdiction. Therefore, the project is anticipated to result in a less than significant impact with regard to conflicts with an applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation. The project site does not include land area subject to specific plans or local coastal programs. No impacts would occur in this regard. c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? Determination: No Impact. Refer to Response 3.4(f) above. Project implementation would not affect areas under the jurisdiction of the Western Riverside County MSHCP or any other habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan. No impact would occur. Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 68 May 2017 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening 3.11 MINERAL RESOURCES 11. MINERAL RESOURCES —Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan? ❑ ❑ ❑ Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? Determination: Less than Significant Impact. The State Mining and Geology Board (SMGB) has established Mineral Resources Zones (MRZs) to designate lands that contain mineral deposits. The classifications used by the State to define MRZs are as follows: • MRZ-1: Areas where the available geologic information indicates no significant likelihood of significant mineral deposits. • MRZ-2a: Areas where the available geologic information indicates that there are significant mineral deposits. • MRZ-2b: Areas where the available geologic information indicates that there is a likelihood of significant mineral deposits. • MRZ-3a: Areas where the available geologic information indicates that mineral deposits exist, however, the significance of the deposit is undetermined. • MRZ-3b: Areas where the available geologic information indicates that mineral deposits are likely to exist, however, the significance of the deposit is undetermined. • MRZ-4: Areas where there is not enough information available to determine the presence of a known mineral deposit. The California State Geologist has classified areas into MRZs and Scientific Resource Zones (SRZs). The zones identify the Statewide or regional significance of mineral deposits based on the economic value of the deposits and accessibility. Within the Temecula Planning Area, the zoning classification of MRZ-3a has been applied. The MRZ-3 areas contain sedimentary deposits that have the potential to supply sand and gravel for concrete and crushed stone for aggregate; however, these areas are not considered to contain deposits of significant economic value, based on available data. Therefore, the project site is located in an area classified as MRZ-3a. Additionally, the State (California Department of Conservation 2015) has not identified the project site as having mineral resources that could be of value to the region and residents of the State. As such, a less than significant impact would occur. May 2017 69 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 11. MINERAL RESOURCES —Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan? ❑ ❑ ❑ Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? Determination: Less than Significant Impact. The State Mining and Geology Board (SMGB) has established Mineral Resources Zones (MRZs) to designate lands that contain mineral deposits. The classifications used by the State to define MRZs are as follows: • MRZ-1: Areas where the available geologic information indicates no significant likelihood of significant mineral deposits. • MRZ-2a: Areas where the available geologic information indicates that there are significant mineral deposits. • MRZ-2b: Areas where the available geologic information indicates that there is a likelihood of significant mineral deposits. • MRZ-3a: Areas where the available geologic information indicates that mineral deposits exist, however, the significance of the deposit is undetermined. • MRZ-3b: Areas where the available geologic information indicates that mineral deposits are likely to exist, however, the significance of the deposit is undetermined. • MRZ-4: Areas where there is not enough information available to determine the presence of a known mineral deposit. The California State Geologist has classified areas into MRZs and Scientific Resource Zones (SRZs). The zones identify the Statewide or regional significance of mineral deposits based on the economic value of the deposits and accessibility. Within the Temecula Planning Area, the zoning classification of MRZ-3a has been applied. The MRZ-3 areas contain sedimentary deposits that have the potential to supply sand and gravel for concrete and crushed stone for aggregate; however, these areas are not considered to contain deposits of significant economic value, based on available data. Therefore, the project site is located in an area classified as MRZ-3a. Additionally, the State (California Department of Conservation 2015) has not identified the project site as having mineral resources that could be of value to the region and residents of the State. As such, a less than significant impact would occur. May 2017 69 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan? Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Refer to Impact 3.11(a). As stated above, the City of Temecula General Plan designates the project site as MRZ-3a. The project is not forecasted to result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site. A less than significant impact would occur. Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 70 May 2017 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening 3.12 NOISE 12. NOISE — Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, exposure of people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, exposure of people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? o 0 0 0 o ❑ 0 0 o 0 IJ 0 o Q 0 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Noise Fundamentals Noise is generally defined as sound that is loud, disagreeable, or unexpected. The selection of a proper noise descriptor for a specific source is dependent on the spatial and temporal distribution, duration, and fluctuation of the noise. The noise descriptors most often encountered when dealing with traffic, community, and environmental noise include an overall frequency -weighted sound level in decibels that approximates the frequency response of the human ear (A -weighted decibels or dBA). Regarding increases in A -weighted noise levels (dBA), the following relationships should be noted for understanding this analysis: • Except in carefully controlled laboratory experiments, a change of 1 dBA cannot be perceived by humans. • Outside of the laboratory, a 3 dBA change is considered a just -perceivable difference. • A change in level of at least 5 dBA is required before any noticeable change in community response would be expected. An increase of 5 dBA is typically considered substantial. • A 10 dBA change is subjectively heard as an approximate doubling in loudness and would almost certainly cause an adverse change in community response (FICON 1992). Noise can be generated by a number of sources, including mobile sources, such as automobiles, trucks, and airplanes, and stationary sources, such as construction sites, machinery, and industrial operations. The rate depends on the ground surface and the number or type of objects between the noise source and May 2017 71 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 12. NOISE — Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, exposure of people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, exposure of people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? o 0 0 0 o ❑ 0 0 o 0 IJ 0 o Q 0 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Noise Fundamentals Noise is generally defined as sound that is loud, disagreeable, or unexpected. The selection of a proper noise descriptor for a specific source is dependent on the spatial and temporal distribution, duration, and fluctuation of the noise. The noise descriptors most often encountered when dealing with traffic, community, and environmental noise include an overall frequency -weighted sound level in decibels that approximates the frequency response of the human ear (A -weighted decibels or dBA). Regarding increases in A -weighted noise levels (dBA), the following relationships should be noted for understanding this analysis: • Except in carefully controlled laboratory experiments, a change of 1 dBA cannot be perceived by humans. • Outside of the laboratory, a 3 dBA change is considered a just -perceivable difference. • A change in level of at least 5 dBA is required before any noticeable change in community response would be expected. An increase of 5 dBA is typically considered substantial. • A 10 dBA change is subjectively heard as an approximate doubling in loudness and would almost certainly cause an adverse change in community response (FICON 1992). Noise can be generated by a number of sources, including mobile sources, such as automobiles, trucks, and airplanes, and stationary sources, such as construction sites, machinery, and industrial operations. The rate depends on the ground surface and the number or type of objects between the noise source and May 2017 71 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening the receiver. Mobile transportation sources, such as highways, and hard and flat surfaces, such as concrete or asphalt, have an attenuation rate of 3.0 dBA per doubling of distance. Soft surfaces, such as uneven or vegetated terrain, have an attenuation rate of about 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance from the source. Noise generated by stationary sources (i.e., construction) typically attenuates at a rate of approximately 6.0 to 7.5 dBA per doubling of distance from the source. Sound levels can be reduced by placing barriers between the noise source and the receiver. In general, barriers contribute to decreasing noise levels only when the structure breaks the "line of sight" between the source and the receiver. Buildings, concrete walls, and berms can all act as effective noise barriers. Wooden fences or broad areas of dense foliage can also reduce noise, but are less effective than solid barriers. Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? Determination: Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. It is difficult to specify noise levels that are generally acceptable to everyone; what is annoying to one person may be unnoticed by another. Standards may be based on documented complaints in response to documented noise levels, or based on studies of the ability of people to sleep, talk, or work under various noise conditions; however, all such studies recognize that individual responses vary considerably. Standards usually address the needs of the majority of the general population. Construction Noise Construction activities generally are temporary and have a short duration, resulting in periodic increases in the ambient noise environment. Construction of the proposed project would occur over approximately six months. Construction activities would include demolition, grading, paving, and roadway construction. Ground -borne noise and other types of construction -related noise impacts typically occur during the initial site preparation. This phase of construction has the potential to create the highest levels of noise; however, it is generally the shortest of all construction phases. Typical noise levels generated by construction equipment are shown in Table 3.12-1, Maximum Noise Levels Generated by Construction Equipment. Operating cycles for these types of construction equipment may involve one or two minutes of full power operation followed by three to four minutes at lower power settings. Other primary sources of acoustical disturbance would be due to random incidents, which would last less than one minute (such as dropping large pieces of equipment or the hydraulic movement of machinery lifts). Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 72 May 2017 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening Table 3.12-1: Maximum Noise Levels Generated by Construction Equipment Type of Equipment Acoustical Use Factor' Lmax at 50 Feet (dBA) Concrete Saw 20 90 Concrete Mixer Truck 40 79 Backhoe 40 78 Dozer 40 82 Excavator 40 81 Forklift 40 78 Paver 50 77 Roller 20 80 Tractor 40 84 Water Truck 40 80 Grader 40 85 General Industrial Equipment 50 85 Jackhammer 20 89 Note: 1. Acoustical Use Factor (percent): Estimates the fraction of time each piece of construction equipment is operating at full power (i.e., its loudest condition) during a construction operation. Source: Federal Highway Administration, Roadway Construction Noise Model (FHWA-HEP-05-054), January 2006. Sensitive uses closest to the project site include single-family residential communities directly adjacent to the project on either side of Pechanga Parkway. These sensitive uses may be exposed to elevated noise levels during project construction; however, as the project involves the widening of a roadway, construction noise would not be concentrated in one location for extended periods of time. Construction equipment would move in a linear fashion along the project area. Furthermore, the residential communities to the west of the project site are screened by noise - reducing sound walls, which can reduce traffic noise between approximately 3 to 5 dB (FHWA 2006). The residential communities to the east are screened by approximately 160 feet of buffer space in addition to noise -reducing sound walls. These residences would experience approximately 13.8 dB of sound reduction due to distance attenuation (considering a construction -noise attenuation rate of 6 dB per doubling distance as described above) and approximately 3 dB of attenuation due to the intervening sound wall (FHWA 2006). Construction noise in Temecula is regulated by City of Temecula Municipal Code Chapter 9.20, which identifies standards, specific noise restrictions, exemptions, and variances for sources of noise in the city. Section 9.20.60 establishes additional standards for various noise sources. Specifically, Section 9.20.60(D) restricts construction activity such that no person may engage in or conduct construction activity when the construction site is within one-quarter mile of an occupied residence, between the hours of 6:30 PM and 7:00 AM, Monday through Friday, and may only engage in or conduct construction activity between the hours of 7:00 AM and 6:30 PM. on Saturday. The Municipal Code section prohibits construction activity on Sundays and nationally recognized holidays. The proposed project would be required to comply with the construction time limitations identified in Section 9.20.60 of the Temecula Municipal Code. Due to the temporary nature of construction, coupled with the fact that construction -related noise is a generally accepted reality in urbanized environments, the City of Temecula does not promulgate standards for construction -generated noise. Adherence to the permitted hours of construction are required in recognition that construction activities undertaken during daytime hours are a typical part of living in an urban environment and do not cause a significant disruption. Implementation of Mitigation Measure NOI-1 would ensure that project construction complies with allowable hours for construction noise and requires construction equipment to be equipped May 2017 73 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening with properly operating and maintained mufflers and other State required noise attenuation devices to further minimize impacts. Thus, a less than significant noise impact would result from construction activities. MITIGATION MEASURES NOI-1 Prior to initiation of construction, the City of Temecula shall ensure that the following measures are incorporated into construction contract documents: • All construction equipment, fixed, or mobile, shall be equipped with properly operating and maintained mufflers and other State required noise attenuation devices. • A construction notice shall be mailed to residents within a 150 -foot radius of the project and shall indicate the dates and duration of construction activities, as well as provide a contact name and a telephone number where residents can inquire about the construction process and register complaints. • All construction, maintenance, or demolition activities associated with the proposed project shall be limited to the hours between 7:00 AM and 6:30 PM Mondays — Saturdays. All construction on Sundays and National holidays shall be prohibited. • Construction haul routes shall be designed to avoid noise sensitive uses (e.g., residences, convalescent homes, etc.). • During construction, stationary construction equipment shall be placed such that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive noise receivers. • Construction equipment staging areas shall be located away from adjacent sensitive receptors. Operational Noise The proposed project would not introduce a new noise -generating source. The project would accommodate existing and predicted traffic demands and uphold the City of Temecula's goals to reduce traffic congestion, improve safety on roadways, and provide better access to regional transportation routes. Due to the expansion of the Pechanga Resort & Casino and continued residential development along Pechanga Parkway, additional roadway capacity to meet existing and future needs has been identified. In response to high traffic volumes, the proposed project would continue the 2009 Pechanga Parkway Phase II improvements. Although the project would be designed to accommodate additional traffic volumes, the proposed improvements would not directly generate new traffic or increase the number of vehicles along the roadway. Furthermore, as previously described, a 3 dBA change in the existing ambient noise level is required in order to instigate a perceivable/noticeable difference in the ambient noise environment. According to the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Technical Noise Supplement to the Traffic Noise Analysis Protocol (2013), a doubling of traffic on a roadway is required in order to result in an increase of 3 dB (a barely perceptible increase). The proposed widening of Pechanga Parkway from four lanes to six lanes would not accommodate a doubling of existing traffic, and thus, would not result in a perceptible increase traffic noise levels. The Project would also include the installation of a noise -reducing sound wall which would further minimize operational traffic noise. Lastly, Section 9.20.60 of the City of Temecula Municipal Code exempts motor vehicles, other than off-highway vehicles, from City noise standards (this exemption does not include sound Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 74 May 2017 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening emanating from motor vehicle sound systems). A less than significant impact would occur in this regard. b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Project construction would have the potential to result in varying degrees of temporary groundborne vibration, depending on the specific construction equipment used and the operations involved. Vibration generated by construction equipment spreads through the ground and diminishes in magnitude with increases in distance. This impact discussion utilizes Caltrans' recommended standard of 0.2 inches per second (in/sec) peak particle velocity with respect to the prevention of structural damage for normal buildings. The nearest residential structures to the project site are located to the west of the project site at approximately 25 feet; however, it is acknowledged that construction activities would occur throughout the project site and would not be concentrated at the point closest to the sensitive receptors. Table 3.12-2 Typical Construction Equipment Vibration Levels, displays vibration levels for typical construction equipment. Table 3.12-2: Typical Construction Equipment Vibration Levels Equipment Peak Particle Velocity at 25 Feet (inches/second) Large Bulldozer 0.089 Caisson Drilling 0.089 Loaded Trucks 0.076 Rock Breaker 0.059 Jackhammer 0.035 Small Bulldozer/Tractors 0.003 Source: Federal Transit Administration, Transit Noise and V'bration Impact Assessment Guidelines, May 2006. Table 12-2; Caltrans (California Department of Transportation), Transportation- and Construction -Induced Vibration Guidance Manual, 2004. Based on the vibration levels presented in Table 3.12-2, ground vibration generated by heavy- duty equipment would not be anticipated to exceed approximately 0.089 in/sec peak particle velocity at 25 feet. Therefore, the use of virtually any type of construction equipment would most likely not result in a groundborne vibration velocity level above 0.2 in/sec and predicted vibration levels at the nearest off-site structures would not exceed recommended criteria. Additionally, this would be a temporary impact and would cease completely when construction ends. Once operational, the project would not be a source of groundborne vibration. Impacts would be less than significant. c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Refer to Impact 3.12(a). The proposed project would accommodate existing and predicted traffic demands and uphold the City of Temecula's goals to reduce traffic congestion, improve roadway safety, and provide better access to regional transportation routes. The project would be designed to accommodate additional traffic volumes and would not directly generate new traffic or increase the number of vehicles along the roadway. The proposed widening of Pechanga Parkway would not result in a perceptible increase traffic noise levels. Long-term noise generated by the addition of two travel lanes in order to widen Pechanga Parkway from four lanes to six lanes would be less than significant. May 2017 75 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? Determination: Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. Refer to Impact 3.12(a). e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, exposure of people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Determination: No Impact. The nearest airport to the project site is the Billy Joe Airport (private), located approximately 3.6 3.8 miles to the northeast. The nearest public airport to the project site is the French Valley Airport, located approximately 7.5 miles north. The proposed project is not located within an airport land use plan. Further, there is no public airport, public use airport, or private airstrip located within 2 miles of the project site. Therefore, no impacts would occur in this regard. For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, exposure of people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Determination: No Impact. Refer to Impact 3.12(e). No impacts would occur in this regard. f) Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 76 May 2017 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening 3.13 POPULATION AND HOUSING 13. POPULATION AND HOUSING - Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? Determination: Less than Significant Impact. The City of Temecula's General Plan Land Use Element provides capacity for a population of 113,421 within the current City limits in 2025 (existing population of 106,289 as of 20149). If buildout is achieved by 2025, development pursuant to the General Plan would result in a population increase of approximately four percent per year, based upon planned land uses - specifically, new housing units. As a roadway improvement project, the proposed project would not directly induce area population growth through the introduction of new residential housing. No housing or commercial businesses are associated with project development. The proposed roadway widening is not anticipated to significantly induce area growth, due to the nature of the improvements proposed. The affected segment of Pechanga Parkway is an existing transportation facility surrounded by existing residential, commercial, and other land uses. Pechanga Parkway functions as a primary north -south arterial for the southern portion of the City of Temecula circulation network. In response to high traffic volumes, the proposed project would continue the 2009 Pechanga Parkway Phase II improvements which widened Pechanga Parkway to a six -lane facility from State Route 79 South (Temecula Parkway) to Via Gilberto and a four -lane facility from Via Gilberto to Wolf Valley Road. No roadway extensions would occur, just the addition of two new travel lanes (and associated improvements) to accommodate existing and anticipated vehicular traffic and relieve congestion along the corridor. As such, the project is not anticipated to induce substantial population growth in the area, either indirectly or directly. A Tess than significant impact would occur in this regard. 9 ESA, Altair Specific Plan Draft Environmental Impact Report, page 3.11-6, prepared for the City of Temecula, May 2016. May 2017 77 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 13. POPULATION AND HOUSING - Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? Determination: Less than Significant Impact. The City of Temecula's General Plan Land Use Element provides capacity for a population of 113,421 within the current City limits in 2025 (existing population of 106,289 as of 20149). If buildout is achieved by 2025, development pursuant to the General Plan would result in a population increase of approximately four percent per year, based upon planned land uses - specifically, new housing units. As a roadway improvement project, the proposed project would not directly induce area population growth through the introduction of new residential housing. No housing or commercial businesses are associated with project development. The proposed roadway widening is not anticipated to significantly induce area growth, due to the nature of the improvements proposed. The affected segment of Pechanga Parkway is an existing transportation facility surrounded by existing residential, commercial, and other land uses. Pechanga Parkway functions as a primary north -south arterial for the southern portion of the City of Temecula circulation network. In response to high traffic volumes, the proposed project would continue the 2009 Pechanga Parkway Phase II improvements which widened Pechanga Parkway to a six -lane facility from State Route 79 South (Temecula Parkway) to Via Gilberto and a four -lane facility from Via Gilberto to Wolf Valley Road. No roadway extensions would occur, just the addition of two new travel lanes (and associated improvements) to accommodate existing and anticipated vehicular traffic and relieve congestion along the corridor. As such, the project is not anticipated to induce substantial population growth in the area, either indirectly or directly. A Tess than significant impact would occur in this regard. 9 ESA, Altair Specific Plan Draft Environmental Impact Report, page 3.11-6, prepared for the City of Temecula, May 2016. May 2017 77 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Determination: No Impact. No housing units would be displaced as a result of project construction. Existing residential land uses are present in the project vicinity. All project improvements would occur within the existing Pechanga Parkway roadway ROW, and as such, would not displace any existing housing units or require the construction of additional replacement housing units elsewhere. Therefore, no impact would occur in this regard. c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Determination: No Impact. Refer to Impact 3.13(b), above. No residential units or residents would be displaced as a result of the project as proposed, and therefore, the project would not necessitate the construction of replacement housing elsewhere. No impact would occur in this regard. Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 78 May 2017 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening 3.14 PUBLIC SERVICES 14. PUBLIC SERVICES a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire protection? Police protection? Schools? Parks? Other public facilities? ❑ ❑ Q ❑ ❑ ❑ IJ �0 o 0 0 IJ o 0 0 0 O 0 ❑ 0 a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives for any of the public services: 1) Fire protection? Determination: Less than Significant Impact. The proposed project would not result in the construction of any aboveground structures and would not directly or indirectly induce significant population growth (refer to Impact 3.13(a), above). As a roadway improvement project, the proposed improvements would not result in the need for additional new or altered fire protection services and would not alter acceptable service ratios or response times. As a roadway improvement project, project implementation would not create new demand for the development of new or physically altered fire protection services or facilities. The project would result in a Tong -term benefit to fire service response times, as its implementation would improve the flow of traffic along Pechanga Parkway, thereby relieving traffic congestion and improving the movement of emergency vehicles. Therefore, a less than significant impact would occur. 2) Police protection? Determination: Less than Significant Impact. The proposed project would not directly or indirectly induce significant population growth, as identified in Impact 3.13(a) above. The project would not result in the need for additional new or altered police protection services and would not alter acceptable service ratios or response times. Further, project implementation would not create the need for the development of additional police facilities. The project would result in a Tong -term benefit to police service response times, as its implementation would improve the flow of traffic along Pechanga Parkway and ease traffic congestion. Therefore, impacts on police protection services with project implementation would be less than significant. May 2017 79 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 14. PUBLIC SERVICES a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire protection? Police protection? Schools? Parks? Other public facilities? ❑ ❑ Q ❑ ❑ ❑ IJ �0 o 0 0 IJ o 0 0 0 O 0 ❑ 0 a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives for any of the public services: 1) Fire protection? Determination: Less than Significant Impact. The proposed project would not result in the construction of any aboveground structures and would not directly or indirectly induce significant population growth (refer to Impact 3.13(a), above). As a roadway improvement project, the proposed improvements would not result in the need for additional new or altered fire protection services and would not alter acceptable service ratios or response times. As a roadway improvement project, project implementation would not create new demand for the development of new or physically altered fire protection services or facilities. The project would result in a Tong -term benefit to fire service response times, as its implementation would improve the flow of traffic along Pechanga Parkway, thereby relieving traffic congestion and improving the movement of emergency vehicles. Therefore, a less than significant impact would occur. 2) Police protection? Determination: Less than Significant Impact. The proposed project would not directly or indirectly induce significant population growth, as identified in Impact 3.13(a) above. The project would not result in the need for additional new or altered police protection services and would not alter acceptable service ratios or response times. Further, project implementation would not create the need for the development of additional police facilities. The project would result in a Tong -term benefit to police service response times, as its implementation would improve the flow of traffic along Pechanga Parkway and ease traffic congestion. Therefore, impacts on police protection services with project implementation would be less than significant. May 2017 79 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening 3) Schools? Determination: No Impact. As identified in Impact 3.13(a), above, the proposed project would not involve a land use that would directly or indirectly induce significant population growth. Therefore, the project would not generate additional school -aged students that would create new demand on local schools for educational services. No impact would occur in this regard. 4) Parks? Determination: No Impact. Due to the nature of the project, no new residents would be generated that would be likely to impact or create a need for additional local parks or other public facilities. No impact would occur in this regard. 5) Other public facilities? Determination: No Impact. Refer also to Impact 3.13(a), above. The proposed project would not induce significant population growth within the area, either directly or indirectly, and therefore would not create new demand for other public facilities (i.e., libraries). Therefore, the project would not create significant impacts on other public facilities. No impact would occur in this regard. Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 80 May 2017 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening 3.15 RECREATION 15. RECREATION a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? Determination: No Impact. Refer to Impact 3.14(a)(4), above. The proposed project consists of a roadway widening and associated improvements, and as such, its implementation would not induce area population growth or increase demand for or use of existing local or regional park facilities. For this reason, the project would have no impact on the local and regional parks system. b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Determination: No Impact. Refer to Impact 3.14(a)(4), above. As a roadway improvement project, the proposed project does not include construction of any recreational facilities, nor would it generate additional area population that would require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities. No impact would occur in this regard. May 2017 81 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 15. RECREATION a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? Determination: No Impact. Refer to Impact 3.14(a)(4), above. The proposed project consists of a roadway widening and associated improvements, and as such, its implementation would not induce area population growth or increase demand for or use of existing local or regional park facilities. For this reason, the project would have no impact on the local and regional parks system. b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Determination: No Impact. Refer to Impact 3.14(a)(4), above. As a roadway improvement project, the proposed project does not include construction of any recreational facilities, nor would it generate additional area population that would require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities. No impact would occur in this regard. May 2017 81 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening 3.16 TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC 16. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC— Would the project: a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance, or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non -motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit? b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, but not limited to, level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads and highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities? o 0 0 Er O 0 Q 0 o 0 0 0 Would the project: a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance, or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non -motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit? Determination: Less than Significant Impact. The objective of the proposed project is to widen Pechanga Parkway from a four lane (110 -foot width) facility to six lanes (134 -foot width) generally between Via Gilberto and North Casino Drive in order to accommodate existing and predicted traffic demands and uphold the City of Temecula's goals to reduce traffic congestion, improve roadway safety, and provide better access to regional transportation routes. Due to the expansion of the Pechanga Resort & Casino and continued residential development along Pechanga Parkway, the need for additional roadway capacity to meet existing and future needs was identified. Pechanga Parkway functions as a primary north -south arterial for the southern portion of the City of Temecula circulation network. In response to high traffic volumes, the proposed project would continue the 2009 Pechanga Parkway Phase II improvements which widened Pechanga Parkway to a six -lane facility from State Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 82 May 2017 Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 16. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC— Would the project: a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance, or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non -motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit? b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, but not limited to, level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads and highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities? o 0 0 Er O 0 Q 0 o 0 0 0 Would the project: a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance, or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non -motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit? Determination: Less than Significant Impact. The objective of the proposed project is to widen Pechanga Parkway from a four lane (110 -foot width) facility to six lanes (134 -foot width) generally between Via Gilberto and North Casino Drive in order to accommodate existing and predicted traffic demands and uphold the City of Temecula's goals to reduce traffic congestion, improve roadway safety, and provide better access to regional transportation routes. Due to the expansion of the Pechanga Resort & Casino and continued residential development along Pechanga Parkway, the need for additional roadway capacity to meet existing and future needs was identified. Pechanga Parkway functions as a primary north -south arterial for the southern portion of the City of Temecula circulation network. In response to high traffic volumes, the proposed project would continue the 2009 Pechanga Parkway Phase II improvements which widened Pechanga Parkway to a six -lane facility from State Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 82 May 2017 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening Route 79 South (Temecula Parkway) to Via Gilberto and a four -lane facility from Via Gilberto to Wolf Valley Road. Although the project would be designed to accommodate additional traffic volumes, the proposed improvements would not directly generate new traffic or increase the number of vehicles along the roadway. Additionally, as the roadway widening would reduce congestion, the project would not conflict with (i.e. lower) an established measure of effectiveness for performance of the system (i.e. level of service), and instead would improve conditions along the roadway, allowing for improved traffic flows and circulation. For the reasons above, the project would not conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance, or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the affected circulation system. Impacts would be less than significant. b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, but not limited to, level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads and highways? Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Refer to Impact 3.16(a), above. The Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) implements its Regional Transportation Plan (RTP), which is a multi -modal, long-range planning document. The RTP identifies programs and policies for congestion management, transit, bicycles and pedestrians, roadways, freight, and financing. Each agency responsible for building and managing transportation facilities, including the City of Temecula, has implementation responsibilities under the RTP. The RTP relies on local plans and policies governing circulation and transportation to identify the region's future multi -modal transportation system. Additionally, the County of Riverside, the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC), and SCAG have undertaken the County Integrated Project (RCIP) which produced three interrelated plans: a Riverside County General Plan for land use and housing, a Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) to determine open spaces and conservation areas, and the Community and Environmental Transportation Acceptability Process (CETAP), which identifies improvements for highways and transit systems. The main goals of CETAP are to: 1) identify and set aside areas for major transportation facilities; 2) ensure that transportation infrastructure will be in place to foster the economic development of Riverside County; and, 3) provide access to schools, jobs, shopping and other daily activities. One major component of the CETAP is to identify a location for the Winchester to Temecula Corridor, which will involve widening of 1-15 and 1-215, as well as construction of French Valley Parkway, connecting the French Valley Future Growth Area to 1-215 and providing an alternate freeway access point to Winchester Road. Other goals include providing expanded rail service and express bus service throughout Riverside County. Further, urbanized areas such as Riverside County are required under State law to adopt a Congestion Management Program (CMP). The Riverside County CMP is updated every two years and includes goals aimed at reducing traffic congestion, improving air quality, and providing a coordination mechanism between land development and transportation improvement decisions. The CMP is administered by the RCTC. The CMP incorporates federal Congestion Management System (CMS) guidelines. The RCTC has also developed an Enhanced Traffic Monitoring System, in which real-time traffic count data can be accessed to evaluate the condition of the CMS, as well as meet other monitoring requirements at the State and federal levels. In support of the CMP, the City of Temecula is required to maintain minimum level of service (LOS) thresholds identified in May 2017 83 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening the General Plan and requires traffic impact analyses for development projects to evaluate potential impacts on the circulation system at a local and regional level. Currently, Pechanga Parkway operates as a primary north -south arterial for the southern portion of the City of Temecula circulation network. In response to high traffic volumes, the proposed project would continue the 2009 Pechanga Parkway Phase II improvements which widened Pechanga Parkway from State Route 79 South (Temecula Parkway) to Wolf Valley Road. The objective of the proposed project is to widen Pechanga Parkway in order to accommodate existing and predicted traffic demands and uphold the City of Temecula General Plan goals to alleviate traffic congestion, improve roadway safety, and provide better access to regional transportation routes. Due to the expansion of the Pechanga Resort & Casino and continued residential development along Pechanga Parkway, the need for additional roadway capacity to meet existing and future needs has been identified. Therefore, as a road widening project, the proposed improvements would contribute to reduced traffic congestion along Pechanga Parkway and would further the long-term transportation needs identified by the City to ensure circulation infrastructure can adequately meet demands and continue to provide efficient local and regional access. As such, the project is not anticipated to conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, but not limited to, level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads and highways. Impacts would be less than significant. c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? Determination: No Impact. As discussed in Impact 3.8(e), the proposed project is located approximately 7.5 miles to the southeast of the French Valley Airport and is not located within the Compatibility Zones identified in the Riverside County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan. Additionally, the project proposes roadway widening and associated improvements (i.e. street lighting) that would in no way result in a change to air traffic patterns. Therefore, no impact would occur. d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? Determination: No Impact. Refer to Impact 3.16(a), above. The proposed project would result in the widening of existing Pechanga Parkway and is intended to accommodate existing and predicted traffic demands, reduce traffic congestion, and improve safety on the roadway. The affected segment of the roadway does not presently support any curves, and no such elements are proposed with the project. No new land uses are proposed along the corridor, and no existing land uses would be disturbed, as all work would occur within the roadway ROW. As such, the project would not substantially increase hazards due to a design feature or incompatible use. No impact would occur. e) Result in inadequate emergency access? Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Refer to Impacts 3.16(a) and (b), above. The project would affect an approximately 3,500 -foot long segment of the roadway, and therefore, temporary construction activities would have the potential to interfere with emergency access to adjacent properties (i.e. residential uses and the casino). The project is subject to City review to ensure that the project as designed does not temporarily or permanently interfere with the provision of emergency access or with evacuation routes. Additionally, a Traffic Control Plan (TCP) would be prepared by the City, prior to project construction, to ensure that project construction activities do not substantially restrict traffic Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 84 May 2017 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening f) flows on area roadways and that emergency access and public safety are maintained at all times during all phases of project construction. Traffic control during project construction shall occur in accordance with the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices), and/or the American Public Works Association (APWA) Work Area Traffic Control Handbook. All traffic control measures shall be in place prior to the commencement of any work. Additionally, over the long-term, the proposed roadway widening is aimed at alleviating traffic congestion along Pechanga Parkway and furthering the long-term transportation needs identified by the City of Temecula General Plan. The roadway improvements would also contribute to enhanced emergency access along Pechanga Parkway by improving traffic circulation and safety along Pechanga Parkway. With implementation of the TCP, and conformance with City standards regarding the provision of emergency access, project construction and operation would not result in inadequate emergency access. Impacts would be less than significant. Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Project construction along Pechanga Parkway may temporarily restrict access to or use of existing area sidewalks, bus stops, and/or bike lanes within the project vicinity. As indicated above, a TCP would be prepared and implemented to ensure that such elements are not substantially affected and that alternative means are provided during the project construction. As construction would be short-term and temporary, combined with implementation of a TCP, project construction would not conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation. Impacts would be less than significant. Additionally, as stated above, Pechanga Parkway functions as a primary north -south arterial and experiences high traffic volumes. Consistent with prior improvements made to the segment of Pechanga Parkway from State Route 79 South (Temecula Parkway) to Wolf Valley Road, the proposed project would provide sidewalks along each side of the roadway within the project boundary to enhance and encourage pedestrian movement and access. The construction of bike lanes is not required as part of the City's roadway design standards for arterial roadways, and no bike lanes are therefore proposed. May 2017 85 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening 3.17 TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES 5. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES — Would the project: Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California native American tribe, and that is: a) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code Section 5020.1(k)?, or b) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe? Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California native American tribe, and that is listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code Section 5020.1(k)? Determination: Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. California State Assembly Bill No. 52 (AB 52) amended CEIA by creating a new category of cultural resources, tribal cultural resources, and requires consultation with Native American Tribes. Governor Brown signed AB 52 on Sept 25, 2014, and the Bill became effective July 1, 2015. Pursuant to AB 52, lead agencies are required to consult with Native American tribes who request consultation for projects located within their traditional territory. AB 52 consultation is required for projects that have a Notice of Preparation, Notice of Negative Declaration, or Notice of Mitigated Negative Declaration on or after July 1, 2015. AB 52 consultation is ongoing throughout the processing of a project until mutual agreement can be reached. Consultation is considered concluded when: (1) all parties are in agreement; (2) acting in good faith and after reasonable effort, mutual agreement cannot be reached; or, (3) tribes are non-responsive. The City has conducted consultation with five area Native American Tribes and other area tribal offices/departments (refer to Appendix C, City of Temecula AB 52 Notification to Tribes). Only the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians indicated that known tribal cultural resources are within the project area of potential effect for the proposed project. The Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 86 May 2017 Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 5. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES — Would the project: Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California native American tribe, and that is: a) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code Section 5020.1(k)?, or b) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe? Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California native American tribe, and that is listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code Section 5020.1(k)? Determination: Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. California State Assembly Bill No. 52 (AB 52) amended CEIA by creating a new category of cultural resources, tribal cultural resources, and requires consultation with Native American Tribes. Governor Brown signed AB 52 on Sept 25, 2014, and the Bill became effective July 1, 2015. Pursuant to AB 52, lead agencies are required to consult with Native American tribes who request consultation for projects located within their traditional territory. AB 52 consultation is required for projects that have a Notice of Preparation, Notice of Negative Declaration, or Notice of Mitigated Negative Declaration on or after July 1, 2015. AB 52 consultation is ongoing throughout the processing of a project until mutual agreement can be reached. Consultation is considered concluded when: (1) all parties are in agreement; (2) acting in good faith and after reasonable effort, mutual agreement cannot be reached; or, (3) tribes are non-responsive. The City has conducted consultation with five area Native American Tribes and other area tribal offices/departments (refer to Appendix C, City of Temecula AB 52 Notification to Tribes). Only the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians indicated that known tribal cultural resources are within the project area of potential effect for the proposed project. The Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 86 May 2017 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening ('Ataaxum) has indicated that the Project site is encompassed within the Tribe's aboriginal territory. To ensure that no unknown tribal resources associated with the traditional cultural landscape are adversely affected, including those associated with the Pechanga Band of Luise no Indians, Mitigation Measure CR -1 through CR -7 is proposed to require monitoring by a qualified archaeologist. Additionally, Mitigation Measure CR -1 through CR -7 will require that a representative from the Pechanga Tribe monitor all ground -disturbing activities that involve trenching for utility installation and earthmoving activities for water quality basins, initial site grading, and fill of imported soil onto the site. If inadvertent human remains are uncovered during earthwork activities, Mitigation Measure CR -9 requires that construction activities be halted in the vicinity of the find and any area that is reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent remains until the County Coroner has been notified, and the remains have been investigated. lithe remains are determined to be Native American in origin, the applicable state law process shall be followed. The proposed mitigation measures would ensure that any tribal resources discovered are properly evaluated for significance and avoided and/or otherwise preserved, as appropriate, in perpetuity. With the proposed mitigation, impacts would be reduced to Tess than significant. MITIGATION MEASURES CR -1 Refer to Impact 3.5(a), above. CR -2 Refer to Impact 3.5(a), above. CR -3 Refer to Impact 3.5(a), above. CR -4 Refer to Impact 3.5(a), above. CR -5 Refer to Impact 3.5(a), above. CR -6 Refer to Impact 3.5(a), above. CR -7 Refer to Impact 3.5(a), above. CR -9 Refer to Impact 3.5(d), above. b. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California native American tribe, and that is a resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1? In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe. Determination: Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. The construction activities proposed under the project have the potential to result in a significant impact to tribal cultural resources. The Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians has shown that the project site is located adjacent to a Traditional Cultural Property known as the Luiseno Ancestral Origin Landscape. This resource is listed in the NRHP and California Register of Historic Places. Potential impacts within the boundaries of this Traditional Cultural Property could cause a substantial adverse change of a tribal cultural resource as defined in Public Resources Code section 21074. As the Pechanga Tribe has identified a Traditional Cultural Resource near the project site, Mitigation Measures CR -1 through CR -7 are proposed. Mitigation Measures CR -1 through CR -7 require the presence of an archaeological monitor and Pechanga Tribal monitor May 2017 87 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening during all project -related ground disturbance activities. With implementation of Mitigation Measure CR -1 through CR -7, the project's potential impacts to the Luiseno Ancestral Origin Landscape and tribal cultural resources would be less than significant. MITIGATION MEASURES CR -1 Refer to Impact 3.5(a), above. CR -2 Refer to Impact 3.5(a), above. CR -3 Refer to Impact 3.5(a), above. CR -4 Refer to Impact 3.5(a), above. CR -5 Refer to Impact 3.5(a), above. CR -6 Refer to Impact 3.5(a), above. CR -7 Refer to Impact 3.5(a), above. CR -9 Refer to Impact 3.5(d), above. Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 88 May 2017 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening 3.18 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS 17. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS - Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new stormwater drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? g) ❑ ❑ 0 IJ O 0 0 IJ O 0 IL 0 o o o 0 o ❑ 0 Er o o Q 0 Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? Determination: No Impact. Surface runoff from the project is also addressed in Impacts 3.9(a), 3.9(c), 3.9(e), and 3.9(f) in Section 3.9, Hydrology and Water Quality, of this Initial Study. The roadway improvements proposed under the project would not result in the production of wastewater, and therefore, no wastewater treatment would be required with project construction or operation. No impact would occur in this regard. b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? Determination: No Impact. Water for the landscaped medians proposed along the affected segment of Pechanga Parkway would continue to be provided by Rancho California Water District (RCWD) and would be served by direct connection to existing recycled water lines. Wastewater services for the project area are currently provided by the Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD). Due to the nature of the roadway improvements, project implementation would not increase wastewater production or May 2017 89 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Incorporated Less Than ificant Significant Impact No Impact 17. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS - Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new stormwater drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? g) ❑ ❑ 0 IJ O 0 0 IJ O 0 IL 0 o o o 0 o ❑ 0 Er o o Q 0 Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? Determination: No Impact. Surface runoff from the project is also addressed in Impacts 3.9(a), 3.9(c), 3.9(e), and 3.9(f) in Section 3.9, Hydrology and Water Quality, of this Initial Study. The roadway improvements proposed under the project would not result in the production of wastewater, and therefore, no wastewater treatment would be required with project construction or operation. No impact would occur in this regard. b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? Determination: No Impact. Water for the landscaped medians proposed along the affected segment of Pechanga Parkway would continue to be provided by Rancho California Water District (RCWD) and would be served by direct connection to existing recycled water lines. Wastewater services for the project area are currently provided by the Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD). Due to the nature of the roadway improvements, project implementation would not increase wastewater production or May 2017 89 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening require the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities. No impact would occur in this regard. c) Require or result in the construction of new stormwater drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Refer to Impact 3.17(a), above. In addition to the widening of Pechanga Parkway from four lanes to six lanes and related circulation improvements (relocation of street lights and traffic signals, median curb and landscaping, etc.), the project also includes curb, gutter, sound wall, sidewalk, landscaping, and storm drain improvements. Additionally, the flood control facilities that run parallel to Pechanga Parkway would require modification to accommodate the widened roadway. As the roadway widening would result in an increase in impervious surface area, thereby potentially increasing stormwater runoff, the proposed stormwater drainage improvements are intended to ensure that stormwater runoff from the affected roadway can be adequately handled and to improve the ability of the City's existing system to adequately accommodate runoff from surrounding properties. All storm drain improvements would occur within the roadway ROW which is highly disturbed, due to prior development activities. Any significant environmental effects resulting with the proposed storm drain improvements as part of the roadway widening project (i.e. to biological or cultural resources, etc.) are evaluated herein in this Initial Study and mitigated for as appropriate to reduce potential project effects to less than significant. As such, although the project would result in construction of new stormwater drainage facilities, construction itself would not directly cause a significant environmental effect. Impacts would be Tess than significant. d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? Determination: No Impact. Refer to Impact 3.17(b), above. As a roadway widening project, the proposed improvements would not substantially increase demand on existing water (or recycled water) service facilities. The project would not result in development of a land use that would require the provision or expansion of water service. Although minimal, water may be used for dust suppression purposes during project construction; however, sufficient water supplies are available to serve such purposes from existing entitlements and resources. New or expanded water treatment facilities would not be required to serve the project site, nor would the project adversely affect the ability of the EMWD to provide adequate wastewater services. No impact would occur in this regard. e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider, which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? Determination: No Impact. Refer to Impact 3.17(b), above. As a roadway widening project, the proposed improvements would not increase demand on existing wastewater treatment facilities. The project would not result in development of a land use that would require the provision or expansion of wastewater treatment facilities to serve the project site, or that would affect the ability of the EMWD to provide adequate wastewater services. No impact would occur in this regard. Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Project construction may require some demolition/excavation of existing materials and soils, which would necessitate solid waste hauling. All excavation and construction debris would be required to demonstrate compliance with all federal, State, and local statutes and regulations f) Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 90 May 2017 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening g) related to solid waste, including the 50 percent diversion of solid waste requirement pursuant to the California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989 (AB 939). Pursuant to AB 939, the City has prepared a Source Reduction and Recycling Element (SSRE) and implements the Element to ensure that the City's solid waste reduction goals continue to be met. The proposed roadway widening project would be required to comply with such goals stipulated under the City's SRRE for diverting solid waste, as applicable. Project construction would also be subject to the solid waste disposal goals and policies identified under the General Plan Growth Management/Public Facilities Element. Project conformance with AB 939, along with the City's SRRE and City General Plan goals and policies, would ensure project compliance with the statutes and regulations in place relative to solid waste disposal. A less than significant impact would occur in this regard. Comply with federal, State, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Refer to Response 3.17(f), above. The project would be required to comply with City's adopted construction and solid waste disposal programs and applicable federal, State, and local regulations pertaining to solid waste. Therefore, a less than significant impact would occur. May 2017 91 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening 3.19 MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE 18. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? Determination: Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. The project's potential impacts to wildlife would be reduced to a less than significant level through the proposed mitigation measures; refer to Section 3.4, Biological Resources. Similarly, potential impacts to cultural resources, particularly unknown buried resources, would be reduced to less than significant levels through compliance with the proposed mitigation measures; refer to Section 3.5, Cultural Resources. As such, potential impacts as noted above would be mitigated through implementing standard City -approved measures and the recommended mitigation measures. b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? Determination: Less than Significant Impact. The proposed project would not have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable. Given the project's relatively small scale, the disturbed nature of the project site (existing roadway ROW), the temporary nature of required construction activities, and the mitigatable long-term operational impacts, project -related cumulative impacts are not considered significant, and no mitigation measures are required. Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 92 May 2017 Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 18. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? Determination: Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. The project's potential impacts to wildlife would be reduced to a less than significant level through the proposed mitigation measures; refer to Section 3.4, Biological Resources. Similarly, potential impacts to cultural resources, particularly unknown buried resources, would be reduced to less than significant levels through compliance with the proposed mitigation measures; refer to Section 3.5, Cultural Resources. As such, potential impacts as noted above would be mitigated through implementing standard City -approved measures and the recommended mitigation measures. b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? Determination: Less than Significant Impact. The proposed project would not have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable. Given the project's relatively small scale, the disturbed nature of the project site (existing roadway ROW), the temporary nature of required construction activities, and the mitigatable long-term operational impacts, project -related cumulative impacts are not considered significant, and no mitigation measures are required. Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 92 May 2017 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Determination: Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. The proposed project would not result in environmental effects that would cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly, following implementation of the recommended mitigation measures for aesthetics, biological and cultural resources, geology and soils, hydrology and water quality, and noise. Construction and operational activities are anticipated to have some minor impacts, all of which have been mitigated where appropriate. All potential long-term impacts would be reduced to less than significant levels through implementation of required mitigation measures, as described in the impact discussions in Sections 3.1 to 3.17, above. May 2017 93 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 94 May 2017 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening 4.0 REFERENCES 4.1 REPORT PREPARATION PERSONNEL LEAD AGENCY City of Temecula 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 William Becerra, Associate Engineer Scott Cooper, Associate Planner ENVIRONMENTAL INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Michael Baker International 40810 County Center Drive, Suite 200 Temecula, CA 92591 Darren Edgington, CEP -IT, LEED AP BD+C, Environmental Project Manager Peter Minegar, CEP -IT, Assistant Project Manager Nicole Marotz, AICP, LEED AP, Senior Environmental Planner Alicia Gonzalez, Environmental Associate Travis McGill, Natural Resources Technical Specialist Achilles Malisos, Air Quality/Climate Change and Noise Studies Manager Hilary Potter, Technical Writer Travis McGill, Biologist Francisco Martinez Jr, PE, Civil Engineer Candice Fenton, Civil Designer BCR Consulting (Cultural Resources) 1420 Guadalajara Place Claremont, CA 91711 David Brunzell, Principal Investigator/Archaeologist GECON West, Inc. (Geotechnical) 41571 Coming Place, Suite 101 Murrieta, CA 92562 Chet Robinson, GE Lisa A. Battiato, CEG May 2017 95 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening 4.2 REFERENCE DOCUMENTS BonTerra Consulting, 2013, April. Habitat Mitigation and Monitoring Program for the Pechanga Parkway Storm Drain Improvements Project. BRC Consulting, LLC. 2016, February 2017. Cultural Resources Assessment. California Department of Conservation. - --. 1990. State of California Special Study Zones, Pechanga Quadrangle. http://gmw.consrv.ca.gov/shmp/download/quad/PECHANGA/maps/ PECHANGA.PDF. Accessed November 3, 2016. - --. 2012. Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program. ftp://ftp.consrv.ca.gov/pub/dlrp/FMMP/pdf/2012/riv12_w.pdf. Accessed November 3, 2016. California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection. 2007. Fire Hazard Severity Zones in SRA, Western Riverside County [map]. Accessed October 20, 2016. http://fra p.fi re.ca.gov/webdata/ma ps/riverside_west/fhszs_ma p.60. pdf. California Department of Toxic Substances Control. 2015. EnviroStor. Accessed October 20, 2016. http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public. California Environmental Protection Agency. 2015. California Greenhouse Gas Emission Inventory, 2015 Edition. Accessed March 28, 2016. http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/inventory/data/data.htm. CalRecycle (California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery). 2016. Facility/Site Summary Details: El Sobrante Landfill (33 -AA -0217). Accessed October 20, 2016. http://www.calrecycle.ca.gov/SW Facilities/Directory/33-AA-0217/Detail/. Caltrans (California Department of Transportation) - --. 2002. Transportation Related Earthborne Vibrations. - --. 2004. Caltrans (California Department of Transportation), Transportation- and Construction - Induced Vibration Guidance Manual. - --. 2013. Technical Noise Supplement to the Traffic Noise Analysis Protocol. CNRA (California Natural Resources Agency). 2012. Our Changing Climate: Vulnerability & Adaptation to the Increasing Risks of Climate Change in California. http://www.energy.ca.gov/2012publications/CEC-500-2012-007/CEC-500-2012-007. pdf. Federal Airport Administration. 2015. Airport Contacts Information. Accessed October 20, 2016. http://www.faa.gov/airports/airport safety/airportdata 5010/menu/contacts.cfm?Region=&Di strict=&State=&County=RIVERSIDE&City=&Use=&Certification=. Federal Highway Administration. 2006. Roadway Construction Noise Model (FHWA-HEP-05-054). Federal Transit Administration. 2006. Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Guidelines. FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency). 2015. Flood Map Service Center. Accessed December 29. https://msc.fema.gov/portal. FICON (Federal Interagency Committee on Noise). 1992, August. Federal Agency Review of Selected Airport Noise Analysis Issues. Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 96 May 2017 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening Geocon West, Inc. Geotechnical Investigation. 2016, October 12.Governor's Office of Planning and Research. 2008. CEQA and Climate Change: Addressing Climate Change Through California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Review. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). 2013. Carbon and Other Biogeochemical Cycles. In: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. http://www.climatechange2013.org/ images/report/WG 1AR5_ALL_FINAL.pdf. Michael Baker International. - --. 2016, August. Project Specific Water Quality Management Plan. - --. 2016. Habitat Assessment and Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) Consistency Analysis for the Pechanga Parkway Widening Project. December 2016. Riverside County Airport Land Use Commission. 2004. Riverside County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan. Riverside County Transportation Commission. 2011. 2011 Riverside County Congestion Management Program. SCAQMD (South Coast Air Quality Management District). - --. 1993. CEQA Air Quality Handbook. - --. 2008. Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology. Revised July 2008. Temecula, City of. - --. 2005a. Temecula General Plan. - --. 2005b. Temecula General Plan Environmental Impact Report. - --. 2010. City of Temecula Sustainability Plan. - --. N.d. City of Temecula Municipal Code. Temecula, City of. Geographic Information System. http://gis.citvoftemecula.org/Html5Viewer/?viewer=CityOfTemecula. Accessed November 3, 2016. Temecula, City of. Geographic Information System, High Fire GIS Layer. http://Ris.citvoftemecula.org/Html5Viewer/?viewer=CityOfTemecula. Accessed October 20, 2016. Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority. 2003. Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan. Volume I, Section 3. http://www.wrc- rca.org/GIS Online Mapping/MSHCP docs/AreaPlans/MSHCP%20Southwest%20Area%20Criter is%20Table.pdf. Accessed November 4, 2016. May 2017 97 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 98 May 2017 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening 4.3 INVENTORY OF MITIGATION MEASURES Aesthetics AES -1 Prior to construction, the City shall define the temporary construction equipment staging areas to be used within the project site. Materials, heavy-duty equipment, and debris piles shall be clustered in order to minimize visual impacts during construction. Biological Resources BIO -1 Within seven days prior to commencement of any ground -disturbing activities (e.g., clearing, grubbing, demolition, earthmoving, construction), burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia) surveys shall be conducted by a qualified biologist per the Burrowing Owl Survey Protocol and Mitigation Guidelines (California Burrowing Owl Consortium 1997) and the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (California Department of Fish and Wildlife [CDFW]; March 7, 2012), as follows: • During the burrowing owl (BUOW) breeding season (February 1 through August 31), protocol surveys for active nest burrows shall be performed within potentially suitable habitat (as determined by the biologist) inside and up to 500 feet from the demarcated disturbance limits. A non -disturbance buffer of 250 feet shall be delineated by the biologist around active nests, in consultation with CDFW, and no disturbance activities shall occur within the buffer(s) until the BUOW breeding season is over. • During the non -breeding season for BUOW (September 1 through January 31), protocol surveys for resident BUOWs shall be performed within potentially suitable habitat (as determined by the biologist) inside and up to 500 feet from the demarcated disturbance limits. A passive relocation program may be implemented for observed BUOWs using occupied burrows pursuant to CDFW approval. The relocation of resident BUOWs shall be according to a relocation plan prepared by the biologist in consultation with and approved by CDFW. This plan shall provide for BUOW relocations to nearby suitable conserved lands possessing available nesting habitat and appropriate development -free buffers that are protected in perpetuity via conservation easements or other land preservation mechanisms. • The pedestrian protocol surveys shall include two early morning surveys between one hour before and two hours after sunrise, and two evening surveys between two hours before and one hour after sunset, via transects spaced to allow 100% visual coverage of the ground surface. The distance between transect center lines shall average approximately 100 feet, and may be reduced in places to account for differences in terrain, vegetation density, and ground surface visibility. BIO -2 1. Within seven days prior to commencement of grading/construction activities, a qualified biologist shall perform a pre -construction survey within 500 feet from the proposed work limits. 2. If active avian nest(s) are discovered within or 500 feet from the work limits, a buffer shall be delineated around the active nest(s) measuring 300 feet for May 2017 99 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening passerines and 500 feet for raptors. A qualified biologist shall monitor the nest(s) weekly after commencement of grading/construction to ensure that nesting behavior is not adversely affected by such activities. 3. If the qualified biologist determines that nesting behavior is adversely affected by grading/construction activities, then a noise mitigation program shall be implemented in consultation with CDFW, to allow such activities to proceed. Once the young have fledged and left the nest(s), then grading/construction activities may proceed within 300 feet (500 feet for raptor species) of the fledged nest(s). 4. Raptor nests are protected under Section 3503.5 of the California Fish and Game Code (California Law 2011) which makes it unlawful to take, possess, or destroy any birds in the orders Falconiformes or Strigiformes; or, to take, possess, or destroy the nests or eggs of any such birds. Consultation with CDFW shall be required prior to the removal of any raptor nest(s) observed during the preconstruction clearance surveys. Cultural Resources CR -1 CR -2 CR -3 CR -4 A professional archaeological monitor shall be present to monitor all ground - disturbing activities associated with the project. The archaeological monitor shall work under the direct supervision of a Cultural Resource Professional that meets the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualification Standards for Archaeology (U.S. Department of Interior, 2012) and as approved by the City of Temecula to provide archaeological expertise in carrying out all mitigation measures related to archaeological resources (Mitigation Measures CR -2, CR -3 and CR -5). The qualified archeologist, or an archaeologist working under the direction of the qualified archaeologist, along with a representative designated by the Pechanga Tribe, shall conduct a pre -construction cultural resources worker sensitivity training to inform construction personnel of the types of cultural resources that may be encountered, and to bring awareness to personnel of actions to be taken in the event of a cultural resources discovery. The City shall ensure that construction personnel are made available for and attend the training and shall retain documentation demonstrating attendance. Prior to the start of ground -disturbing activities, the qualified archaeologist shall designate an archaeological monitor to observe ground -disturbing activities, including but not limited to, brush clearance and grubbing, grading, trenching, excavation, and the construction of fencing and access roads, in consultation with the Pechanga tribal monitor. If ground -disturbing activities occur simultaneously in two or more areas located more than 500 feet apart, additional archaeological monitors may be required. The archaeological monitor shall keep daily logs. After monitoring has been completed, the qualified archaeologist shall prepare a monitoring report that details the results of monitoring activities, which shall be submitted to the City, Pechanga Tribe, and to the EIC at the University of California, Riverside. At least 30 days prior to the start of any ground disturbing activity, the City shall contact the Pechanga Tribe of grading, excavation and the monitoring program, and to coordinate with the Pechanga Tribe to develop a Cultural Resources Treatment and Monitoring Agreement (Agreement). The Agreement shall address the treatment of known cultural resources; the designation, responsibilities, and participation of Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 100 May 2017 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening Pechanga Tribal monitors during grading, excavation and all ground disturbing activities; project grading and development scheduling; terms of compensation for the monitors; and treatment and final disposition of any cultural resources, sacred sites, and human remains discovered on the site. The Pechanga Tribal monitor shall monitor observe ground -disturbing activities, including but not limited to, brush clearance and grubbing, grading, trenching, excavation, and the construction of fencing and access roads, in consultation with the archaeological monitor. If ground -disturbing activities occur simultaneously in two or more areas located more than 500 feet apart, additional archaeological monitors may be required. The Pechanga tribal monitor shall keep daily logs. If ground -disturbing activities occur simultaneously in two or more locations, additional Pechanga tribal monitors may be required. CR -5 If inadvertent discoveries of subsurface archaeological/cultural resources are made during ground -disturbing activities, the applicant, the qualified archaeologist, and the Pechanga Tribe shall assess the significance of such resources and shall meet and confer regarding the mitigation for such resources. Pursuant to PRC Section 21083.2(b) avoidance is the preferred method of preservation for archaeological resources. PRC Section 21084.3 further requires that agencies shall avoid damaging effects to tribal cultural resources, if feasible. If the City, the qualified archaeologist, and the Pechanga Tribe cannot agree on the significance or the mitigation for such resources, these issues will be presented to the City Planning Director for decision. The City Planning Director shall make the determination based on the provisions of the CEQA with respect to archaeological resources and shall take into account the religious beliefs, customs, and practices of the Pechanga Tribe. Notwithstanding any other rights available under the law, the decision of the City Planning Director shall be appealable to the City Planning Commission and/or City Council. CR -6 The City shall relinquish ownership of all cultural resources, including sacred items, burial goods and all archaeological artifacts that are recovered as a result of project implementation to the Pechanga Tribe for proper treatment and disposition as outlined in the Agreement (Mitigation Measure CUL -4). CR -7 All sacred sites, should they be encountered within the project area, shall be avoided and preserved as the preferred mitigation, if feasible. CR -8 Prior to Grading Permit issuance and in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan Implementation Measure OS -26, Development Review Process, the City shall retain a qualified paleontologist to observe grading and deep excavation activities in areas where the probable presence of paleontological resources is identified. In the event that paleontological resources are inadvertently discovered during ground disturbing activities, the qualified paleontologist shall document the discovery as appropriate, evaluate the potential resource, and assess the significance of the find under the criteria set forth in CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5. If the fossil or fossil - bearing deposit are discovered during construction, excavations within 50 feet of the find shall be temporarily halted or diverted until the discovery is examined by the qualified paleontologist (in accordance with Society of Vertebrate Paleontology standards, Society of Vertebrate Paleontology, 1995). The paleontologist shall notify the appropriate agencies to determine procedures that would be followed before construction is allowed to resume at the location of the find. If the City determines May 2017 101 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration CR -9 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening that avoidance is not feasible, the paleontologist shall prepare an excavation plan for mitigating the effect of the Project on the qualities that make the resource significant (Paleontological Resources Mitigation Program). The Paleontological Resources Mitigation Program shall be submitted to the City for review and approval, prior to the resumption of grading activities at the location of the find. Consistent with State CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5, Subdivision (e), in the event of an accidental discovery or recognition of any human remains, the County Coroner shall be notified and construction activities at the affected work site shall be halted. Further, pursuant to PRC Section 5097.98(b) remains shall be left in place and free from disturbance until a final decision as to the treatment and disposition has been made. If the remains are found to be Native American, the County Coroner shall notify the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) within 24 hours. The NAHC shall immediately notify the most likely descendant(s) under Public Resources Code Section 5097.98, and the descendants must make recommendations or state their preference for treatment within 48 hours of being granted access to the site as identified in Agreement described in Mitigation Measure CR -4. Geology and Soils GEO-1 Prior to commencement of any project grading activities, and in accordance with National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) requirements, the City of Temecula shall prepare a stormwater pollution prevention plan (SWPPP) for approval by the City's Public Works Department. The SWPPP shall include relevant best management practices (BMPs) in order to minimize soil erosion and water quality impacts during project construction. Hydrology and Water Quality GEO-1 Refer to Geology, above. Noise NOI-1 Prior to initiation of construction, the City of Temecula shall ensure that the following measures are incorporated into construction contract documents: • All construction equipment, fixed, or mobile, shall be equipped with properly operating and maintained mufflers and other State required noise attenuation devices. • A construction notice shall be mailed to residents within a 150 -foot radius of the project and shall indicate the dates and duration of construction activities, as well as provide a contact name and a telephone number where residents can inquire about the construction process and register complaints. • All construction, maintenance, or demolition activities associated with the proposed project shall be limited to the hours between 7:00 AM and 6:30 PM Mondays — Saturdays. All construction on Sundays and National holidays shall be prohibited. • Construction haul routes shall be designed to avoid noise sensitive uses (e.g., residences, convalescent homes, etc.). Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 102 May 2017 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening • During construction, stationary construction equipment shall be placed such that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive noise receivers. • Construction equipment staging areas shall be located away from adjacent sensitive receptors. Tribal Cultural Resources CR -1 Refer to Impact 3.5(a), above. CR -2 Refer to Impact 3.5(a), above. CR -3 Refer to Impact 3.5(a), above. CR -4 Refer to Impact 3.5(a), above. CR -5 Refer to Impact 3.5(a), above. CR -6 Refer to Impact 3.5(a), above. CR -7 Refer to Impact 3.5(a), above. CR -9 Refer to Impact 3.5(d), above. May 2017 103 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 104 May 2017 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening 5.0 CONSULTANT RECOMMENDATION Based on the information and environmental analysis contained in the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration, we recommend that the City of Temecula prepare a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Pechanga Parkway Widening Project. Refer to Section 6.0, Lead Agency Determination. Darren Edgington, CEP -IT, LEED AP Associate/Environmental Specialist Michael Baker International May 16, 2017 Date May 2017 105 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 106 May 2017 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening 6.0 LEAD AGENCY DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed use COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposal could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described in Section 5.0 have been added. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposal MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposal MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but at least one effect (1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and (2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. Signature William Becerra/Associate Engineer City of Temecula Agency //61Z.6/7 Printed Name/Title Date May 2017 107 initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 108 May 2017 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening Appendix A: Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas Data December 2016 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 1.0 Project Characteristics Page 1 of 28 Date: 11/11/2016 3:26 PM Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Annual Pechanga Parkway Widening Riverside -South Coast County, Annual 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses 1 Size 1 Metric ILot Acreage I Floor Surface Area I Population Other Asphalt Surfaces 120.15 1000sgft 2.76 120,151.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Climate Zone 10 Utility Company Southern California Edison Wind Speed (m/s) 2.4 CO2 Intensity 702.44 CH4 Intensity (Ib/MWhr) (Ib/MWhr) 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non -Default Data 0.029 Precipitation Freq (Days) 28 Operational Year 2018 N20 Intensity (Ib/MWhr) 0.006 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 2 of 28 Date: 11/11/2016 3:26 PM Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Annual Project Characteristics - Land Use - Accounts for roadway expansion, curbs, gutters, median, bus turnout, sidewalks, and access ramps Construction Phase - Construction phase duration per project contractor Off-road Equipment - Off-road Equipment - Equipment list per project contractor Off-road Equipment - Construction equipment per project contractor Off-road Equipment - Equipment list per project contractor Off-road Equipment - Equipment list per project contractor Grading - Demolition - Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - SCAQMD Rule 403 Table Name tblConstD ustM itigation tblConstDustM itigation tblConstructionPhase tblConstructionPhase tblConstructionPhase tblConstructionPhase tblConstructionPhase tblConstructionPhase tblConstructionPhase tblConstructionPhase tblConstructionPhase tblConstructionPhase tblConstructionPhase tblGrading Column Name • • • • • Clean PavedRoad PercentReduction W aterU npaved RoadVehicleSpeed NumDays NumDays NumDays PhaseEndDate PhaseEndDate PhaseEndDate PhaseEndDate PhaseStartDate PhaseStartDate PhaseStartDate PhaseStartDate MaterialExported Default Value Y • Y • Y • 4- • • 0 40 220.00 20.00 6.00 10/25/2017 12/8/2016 12/21/2016 11/8/2017 12/22/2016 11/11/2016 12/14/2016 10/26/2017 New Value 40 15 10.00 15.00 10.00 5/19/2017 4/21/2017 5/5/2017 6/2/2017 5/6/2017 4/1/2017 4/22/2017 5/20/2017 0.00 1,973.00 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 3 of 28 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Annual Date: 11/11/2016 3:26 PM tblOffRoadEquipment LoadFactor • 0.50 0.50 4 4 tblOffRoadEquipment LoadFactor 0.42 i 0.42 tblOffRoadEquipment • LoadFactor • 0.50 + 0.50 tblOffRoadEquipment • LoadFactor • 0.44 + 0.44 tblOffRoadEquipment • LoadFactor • Y 0.42 i 0.42 tblOffRoadEquipment • LoadFactor • Y 0.42 f 0.42 tblOffRoadEquipment • LoadFactor • 0.36 1 0.36 tblOffRoadEquipment • LoadFactor • 0.38 + 0.38 tblOffRoadEquipment LoadFactor Y 0.30 + 0.30 tblOffRoadEquipment LoadFactor • 0.50 + 0.50 tblOffRoadEquipment ▪ OffRoadEquipmentType + Trenchers tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType : t Other Construction Equipment tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType T + Trenchers tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType + Off -Highway Tractors tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType f Other Construction Equipment tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType Y + Other Construction Equipment tblOffRoadEquipment ▪ OffRoadEquipmentType + Paving Equipment tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType Y Rollers tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType Y i Surfacing Equipment tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType + Trenchers tblOffRoadEquipment ▪ OffRoadEquipmentType 4▪ - t Surfacing Equipment tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType Y f Other Construction Equipment tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount T 1.00 t 0.00 4 4- tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 t 0.00 4 4- tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount • 1.00 1 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount • 2.00 1 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment ▪ OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount • 1.00 0.00 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 4 of 28 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Annual Date: 11/11/2016 3:26 PM tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount • 2.00 1.00 4 4 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount • 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment • • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount • 1.00 + 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment • • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 + 1.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount • 2.00 + 1.00 tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount •1.00 t 0.00 4 tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 0.00 2.0 Emissions Summary CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 5 of 28 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Annual 2.1 Overall Construction Unmitigated Construction Date: 11/11/2016 3:26 PM Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Year tons/yr MT/yr 2017 • 0.0530 0.5373 0.3330 7.1000e- 0.0299 0.0282 0.0581 5.6300e- 0.0262 0.0318 0.0000 66.0650 66.0650 0.0138 0.0000 66.4093 004 003 + . PM2.5 , 004 Total 003 1 1 y i Maximum 0.0530 0.5373 0.3330 7.1000e- 004 0.0299 0.0282 0.0581 5.6300e- 003 0.0262 0.0318 0.0000 66.0650 66.0650 0.0138 0.0000 66.4093 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO 502 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Year tons/yr MT/yr 2017 • 0.0530 0.5373 0.3330 7.1000e- 0.0131 0.0282 0.0413 2.8000e- 0.0262 0.0290 1 0.0000 66.0650 66.0650 0.0138 0.0000 66.4092 004 003 + . PM2.5 PM2.5 Total i Maximum 0.0530 0.5373 0.3330 7.1000e- 0.0131 0.0282 0.0413 2.8000e- 0.0262 0.0290 0.0000 66.0650 66.0650 0.0138 0.0000 66.4092 28.93 50.27 0.00 8.90 004 0.00 0.00 0.00 003 0.00 Reduction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total - Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 56.20 0.00 28.93 50.27 0.00 8.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 6 of 28 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Annual Date: 11/11/2016 3:26 PM Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) 2 2-11-2017 5-10-2017 0.3766 0.3766 3 5-11-2017 8-10-2017 0.2119 0.2119 Total CO2 CH4 Highest 0.3766 0.3766 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr ' Area Energy Mobile Waste Water A • • • Ai • •., • • . 9.5900e- 003 0.0000 -1- 0.0000 M 1.0000e- 005 r 0.0000 r 0.0000 r 7 - 1.5500e- 003 r 0.0000 0.0000 r 0.0000 r 0.0000 0.0000 r Y • Y 0.0000 Y 1.0000e- , 005 r 0.0000 r 0.0000 r 0.0000 Y 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 r 0.0000 r 0.0000 Y 0.0000 r 0.0000 • Y , Y T 0.0000 T • i rr • 1.0000e- 005 Y 0.0000 r 0.0000 r 0.0000 r 0.0000 1.0000e- a 005 r 4 0.0000 T • 0.0000 r + 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 ± a 1 0.0000 1 1 0.0000 a 1 0.0000 a a 1 0.0000 A a • 2.9800e- 003 r 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.9800e- 003 Y 0.0000 Y 0.0000 r 0.0000 Y -. 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 r 0.0000 0.0000 r 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 3.1900e- 003 r t 0.0000 0.0000 T r 0.0000 0.0000 T r 0.0000 0.0000 r T 0.0000 0.0000 Total 9.5900e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.5500e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.9800e- 003 2.9800e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.1900e- 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 7 of 28 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Annual 2.2 Overall Operational Mitigated Operational Date: 11/11/2016 3:26 PM 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase ROG ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category A tons/yr MT/yr Area Energy Mobile Waste Water • • • • u • • • • 9.5900e- 003 0.0000 r 0.0000 -r 1.0000e- 005 r 0.0000 rr 0.0000 r 1.5500e- 003 r 0.0000 0.0000 r r 0.0000 r 0.0000 0.0000 r r r 0.0000 r r 1.0000e- , 005 r 0.0000 0.0000 r 0.0000 r 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 r 0.0000 0.0000 r 0.0000 r 0.0000 r 0.0000 r r 1.0000e- 005 r 0.0000 0.0000 r 0.0000 r 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 r 4 0.0000 4 0.0000 r • 0.0000 r • 0.0000 + 0.0000 + l i 0.0000 1 0.0000 i i 0.0000 1 l i 0.0000 l 1 • 2.9800e- 003 0.0000 r 0.0000 r 0.0000 0.0000 • 2.9800e- 003 r 0.0000 r 0.0000 r 0.0000 r 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 r 7 0.0000 r 0.0000 r 0.0000 r 0.0000 0.0000 t 0.0000 r 0.0000 r 0.0000 r 0.0000 3.1900e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 9.5900e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.5500e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.9800e- 003 2.9800e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.1900e- 003 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase ROG NOx CO SO2 Fug'tive Exhaust PM10 Fug'tive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio -CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent , 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 8 of 28 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Annual Date: 11/11/2016 3:26 PM Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 : Demolition i 2 :Grading 3 :Demolition :Grading :4/1/2017 i .4/22/2017 :Building Construction :Building Construction .5/6/2017 :5/19/2017 } -I- -I- -I- 5/20/2017 :6/2/2017 5: 10: :4/21/2017 4 :5/5/2017 4 4 5: 15: 4 5: 10: 4 t 5: 10: 4 :Paving :Paving Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0 Acres of Paving: 2.76 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non -Residential Indoor: 0; Non -Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating — sqft) OffRoad Equipment Phase Name Demolition Paving Demolition Building Construction Building Construction Building Construction Demolition Paving Paving Demolition Grading Building Construction Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power ( Load Factor :Trenchers 11 8.00: 78: 1 : Cement and Mortar Mixers : 0 i 8.00 H 9; :Concrete/Industrial Saws s 11 8.00: 81 Generator Sets F Oi 8.00 H 84 I H 1 I- 1 : Cranes: Oi 8.00: 231 1 • Forklifts 1- 01 7.00:I- .00: 89 : : Other Construction Equipment F 11 8.00: 172: I 1 I•- 1 : Pavers: 01 8.00: 130: i 1- 1 I - : Rollers : 11 8.00: 80: 1 • Rubber Tired Dozers I- 01 8.00 247: 1•Rubber Tired Dozers F 01 8.00 F 247 + +- • Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1: 6.00' 97 0.50 0.56 0.73 0.74 0.29 0.20 0.42 0.42 0.38 0.40 0.40 0.37 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 9 of 28 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Annual Date: 11/11/2016 3:26 PM Demolition • Tractors/LoadersBackhoes 1 Grading •Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes Paving •Tractors/LoadersBackhoes Grading Grading :Trenchers * Graders Paving :Paving Equipment Grading Building Construction * Off -Highway Tractors :Welders Grading :Other Construction Equipment Building Construction :Other Construction Equipment Building Construction :Paving Equipment Building Construction :Rollers Building Construction :Surfacing Equipment Building Construction Paving Paving :Trenchers :Surfacing Equipment ;Other Construction Equipment 1. 8.00, 971 4 E 11 7.00. 97, 1I• 1i 8.00. 97: 11 8.00 • 78: F• • 01 8.00 . 187 • • 11 8.00. 132: I- 1 • 11 H 8.00, 124. 01 8.00. 46: • 11 8.00. 172: 11 8.00 • 172: I- 4. 11 8.001 132: 11 8.00 • 80: 11 8.00. 2631 11 8.00. 78 • 11 8.00 . 263 + +- I. 1: 8.00' 172' 0.37 0.37 0.37 0.50 0.41 0.36 0.44 0.45 0.42 0.42 0.36 0.38 0.30 0.50 0.30 0.42 Trips and VMT Phase Name Building Construction Demolition Grading Paving Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class 61 50.00: 20.001 0.00: 14.701 6.901 20.001 L D_M ix 1 H DT_M ix 1 HHDT t 4 4h 10.00: 0.001 189.00: 14.701 6.901 20.00:LD_Mix :HDT_Mix 1HHDT I 1 t ;t 4F 10.00: 0.001 247.00, 14.701 6.901 20.001LD_Mix 1HDT_Mix 1HHDT 4- T 1- 4- 4- • 4- -1 5: 13.00: 0.00: 0.00: 14.70: 6.90: 20.00:LD Mix :HDT_Mix :HHDT 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Use Soil Stabilizer Replace Ground Cover Water Exposed Area Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads Clean Paved Roads 3.2 Demolition - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site Page 10 of 28 Date: 11/11/2016 3:26 PM Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Annual ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category - tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust Off -Road • 0.0154 r 0.1413 r 0.0982 rr 1.4000e- 004 0.0206 r 0.0000 r9.4700e- 003 0.0206 9.4700e- 003 3.1100e- 003 r 0.0000 r1- 8.9000e- , 003 3.1100e- i 0.0000 003 i J r 4t 8.9000e- + 0.0000 , 003 1 0.0000 12.8110 0.0000 r 12.8110 0.0000 r 3.0400e- 003 0.0000 r 0.0000 , 0.0000 12.8871 Total 0.0154 0.1413 0.0982 1.4000e- 004 0.0206 9.4700e- 003 0.0300 3.1100e- 003 8.9000e- 003 0.0120 0.0000 12.8110 12.8110 3.0400e- 003 0.0000 12.8871 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 11 of 28 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Annual 3.2 Demolition - 2017 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Date: 11/11/2016 3:26 PM Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category MT/yr tons/yr A MT/yr Hauling • 6.7000e- 0.0289 3.5800e- 7.0000e- 1.6300e- 1.5000e- 1.7800e- 4.5000e- 1.4000e- 5.9000e- + 0.0000 7.0357 7.0357 4.9000e- 0.0000 7.0479 004 003 005 003 004 003 004 004 004 i 004 , r r i Vendor • 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 r 0.0000 - 0.0000 T 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 r 0.0000 0.0000 T 0.0000 003 l Worker • 4.5000e- 3.5000e- �3.6200e- 1.0000e- 8.2000e- r1.0000e- r8.3000e- r2.2000e- 0.0000 T 2.2000e- I 0.0000 0.7562 0.7562 r2.0000e- 0.0000 T 0.7568 004 004 003 005 004 005 004 004 004 j 005 , 003 , Total 0.0154 0.1413 0.0982 1.4000e- 6.8200e- 9.4700e- 0.0163 y 8.9000e- 9.9300e- 0.0000 12.8110 12.8110 Total 0.0000 1.1200e- 0.0292 7.2000e- 8.0000e- 2.4500e- 1.6000e- 2.6100e- 6.7000e- 1.4000e- 8.1000e- 0.0000 7.7919 7.7919 5.1000e- 0.0000 7.8047 003 003 005 003 004 003 004 004 004 004 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category tons/yr A MT/yr Fugitive Dust 6.8200e- 0.0000 6.8200e- 1.0300e- 0.0000 1.0300e- I 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 003 003 003 003 1 Off -Road • 0.0154 r 0.1413 0.0982 r1.4000e- r 9.4700e- r9.4700e- r8.9000e- T 8.9000e- + 0.0000 r 12.8110 r 12.8110 r3.0400e- r 0.0000 T 12.8871 , 004 003 003 , 003 003 i 003 , Total 0.0154 0.1413 0.0982 1.4000e- 6.8200e- 9.4700e- 0.0163 1.0300e- 8.9000e- 9.9300e- 0.0000 12.8110 12.8110 3.0400e- 0.0000 12.8871 004 003 003 003 003 003 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 12 of 28 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Annual 3.2 Demolition - 2017 Mitigated Construction Off -Site Date: 11/11/2016 3:26 PM 3.3 Grading - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e tons/yr Category tons/yr MT/yr • • Hauling • Vendor • Worker • • 6.7000e- 004 -, w 0.0000 .. T- 4.5000e- 004 0.0289 r 0.0000 r3.5000e- 004 3.5800e- 003 0.0000 r3.6200e- 003 7.0000e- 005 T- 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.1400e- 003 T- 0.0000 r 5.4000e- 004 1.5000e- 004 T- 0.0000 r1.0000e- 005 1.2900e- , 003 T- 0.0000 r5.4000e- 004 3.3000e- , 004 r 0.0000 r1.5000e- 004 1.4000e- 004 T- 0.0000 T 0.0000 4.7000e- + 0.0000 004 ± 1 T „ 0.0000 i 0.0000 -• T 1.5000e- 1 0,0000 004 i i 7.0357 r 0.0000 0.7562 7.0357 r 0.0000 T 0.7562 4.9000e- 004 T- 0.0000 r2.0000e- 005 0.0000 , r 0.0000 T- -' 0.0000 , 7.0479 0.0000 0.7568 0.0607 Total 1.1200e- 003 0.0292 7.2000e- 003 8.0000e- 005 1.6800e- 003 1.6000e- 004 1.8300e- 003 4.8000e- 004 1.4000e- 004 6.2000e- 004 0.0000 7.7919 7.7919 5.1000e- 004 0.0000 7.8047 3.3 Grading - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust • Off -Road •8.8700e- 003 r 0.0902 Tr 0.0607 8.0000e- 005 1.2000e- , 004 r 0.0000 r 5.6100e- 003 1.2000e- 004 r 5.6100e- 003 2.0000e- 005 r . 0.0000 . T • 5.1700e- • 003 2.0000e- i 0.0000 005 i 1 T 4 5.1700e- I 0.0000 003 i l 0.0000 r 7.8287 0.0000 r 7.8287 0.0000 r 2.4000e- 003 0.0000 r t 0.0000 , 0.0000 7.8887 Total 8.8700e- 003 0.0902 0.0607 8.0000e- 005 1.2000e- 004 5.6100e- 003 5.7300e- 003 2.0000e- 005 5.1700e- 003 5.1900e- 003 0.0000 7.8287 7.8287 2.4000e- 003 0.0000 7.8887 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 13 of 28 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Annual 3.3 Grading - 2017 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Date: 11/11/2016 3:26 PM Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category MT/yr tons/yr MT/yr Hauling Vendor Worker • r n • • •, • • 8.7000e- 004 0.0000 3.0000e- 004 0.0377 , r 0.0000 r2.4000e- 004 4.6800e- 003 0.0000 7 r2.4100e- 003 1.0000e- 004 r 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 2.1300e- , 003 0.0000 r5.5000e- 004 2.0000e- 004 r 0.0000 r 0.0000 2.3300e- 003 Y 0.0000 Y 5.5000e- 004 5.8000e- 004 r 0.0000 r1.5000e- 004 1.9000e- 004 r 0.0000 Y 0.0000 7.7000e- + 0.0000 004 1 i r 1 0.0000 i 0.0000 l A T 4 1.5000e- + 0.0000 004 1 A 9.1948 -, 0.0000 -. 0.5041 9.1948 0.0000 0.5041 6.4000e- 004 r 7 0.0000 r2.0000e- 005 0.0000 , 0.0000 0.0000 , 9.2108 0.0000 0.5045 Total 8.0000e- 005 1.1700e- 003 0.0380 7.0900e- 003 1.1000e- 004 2.6800e- 003 2.0000e- 004 2.8800e- 003 7.3000e- 004 1.9000e- 004 9.2000e- 004 0.0000 9.6990 9.6990 6.6000e- 004 0.0000 9.7153 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust • Off -Road • 8.8700e- 003 r 0.0902 r 0.0607 r 8.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 Y -, . 0.0000 • 5.6100e- 003 . 4.0000e- ; 005 w -, • 5.6100e- 003 1.0000e- 005 -, 0.0000 5.1700e- 003 1.0000e- I 0.0000 005 + 1 r 4 5.1700e- 1 0.0000 003 i 0.0000 ,� 7 7.8287 0.0000 7.8287 . 0.0000 r2.4000e- 003 0.0000 . r T 0.0000 • , 0.0000 7.8887 Total 8.8700e- 003 0.0902 0.0607 8.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 5.6100e- 003 5.6500e- 003 1.0000e- 005 5.1700e- 003 5.1800e- 003 0.0000 7.8287 7.8287 2.4000e- 003 0.0000 7.8887 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 14 of 28 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Annual 3.3 Grading - 2017 Mitigated Construction Off -Site Date: 11/11/2016 3:26 PM 3.4 Building Construction - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category MT/yr tons/yr MT/yr Hauling Vendor Worker • • i,- • . A 8.7000e- 004 0.0000 3.0000e- 004 0.0377 r 0.0000 r 2.4000e- 004 4.6800e- 003 0.0000 r2.4100e- 003 1.0000e- 004 r 0.0000 r1.0000e- 005 1.4900e- , 003 r 0.0000 r3.6000e- 004 2.0000e- , 004 r 0.0000 r 0.0000 1.6900e- , 003 r 0.0000 r3.6000e- 004 4.3000e- , 004 r 0.0000 r 1.0000e- 004 1.9000e- 004 , r 0.0000 r 0.0000 6.2000e- i 0.0000 004 i i r '1 0.0000 1 0.0000 i i -. T 1.0000e- i 0.0000 004 j l • 9.1948 , 0.0000 0.5041 • 9.1948 • 0.0000 r • 0.5041 6.4000e- 004 , r 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 , 0.0000 t r 0.0000 , 9.2108 0.0000 0.5045 Total 0.0114 1.1700e- 003 0.0380 7.0900e- 003 1.1000e- 004 1.8500e- 003 2.0000e- 004 2.0500e- 003 5.3000e- 004 1.9000e- 004 7.2000e- 004 0.0000 9.6990 9.6990 6.6000e- 004 0.0000 9.7153 3.4 Building Construction - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road • 0.0114 0.1213 0.0760 1.3000e- 7.0600e- 7.0600e- 6.4900e- 6.4900e- i 0.0000 11.7087 11.7087 3.5900e- 0.0000 11.7984 004 003 003 003 003 j 003 , Total 0.0114 0.1213 0.0760 1.3000e- 7.0600e- 7.0600e- 6.4900e- 6.4900e- 0.0000 11.7087 11.7087 3.5900e- 0.0000 11.7984 004 003 003 003 003 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 15 of 28 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Annual 3.4 Building Construction - 2017 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Date: 11/11/2016 3:26 PM Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category MT/yr tons/yr MT/yr Hauling Vendor Worker • • • 0.0000 4.3000e- 004 1.5100e- 003 0.0000 r 0.0132 1.1800e- 003 0.0000 2.8300e- , 003 , 0.0121 0.0000 r3.0000e- 005 r3.0000e- 005 0.0000 �6.3000e- 004 r2.7500e- 003 0.0000 1.3000e- , 004 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 7.6000e- -1-- , 004 1r r2.7700e- 003 0.0000 , 004 7.3000e- 004 0.0000 -1- r1.2000e- , 004 2.0000e- , 005 0.0000 i 0.0000 i A T 3.0000e- + 0.0000 , 004 y A T 7.5000e- + 0.0000 004 + 0.0000 2.4974 1 2.5206 0.0000 r 2.4974 2.5206 0.0000 r2.3000e- , 004 r8.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 , r 0.0000 T , 0.0000 2.5032 2.5227 Total 0.0114 1.9400e- 003 0.0144 0.0149 6.0000e- 005 3.3800e- 003 1.5000e- 004 3.5300e- 003 9.1000e- 004 1.4000e- 004 1.0500e- 003 0.0000 5.0180 5.0180 3.1000e- 004 0.0000 5.0259 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road • 0.0114 0.1213 0.0760 1.3000e- 7.0600e- 7.0600e- 6.4900e- 6.4900e- + 0.0000 11.7087 11.7087 3.5900e- 0.0000 11.7984 , 004 , 003 003 003 003 1 003 , Total 0.0114 0.1213 0.0760 1.3000e- 7.0600e- 7.0600e- 6.4900e- 6.4900e- 0.0000 11.7087 11.7087 3.5900e- 0.0000 11.7984 004 003 003 003 003 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 16 of 28 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Annual 3.4 Building Construction - 2017 Mitigated Construction Off -Site Date: 11/11/2016 3:26 PM 3.5 Paving - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr • Hauling Vendor Worker w • •r • 0.0000 4.3000e- 004 1.5100e- 003 0.0000 -,- r 0.0132 r1.1800e- 003 0.0000 2.8300e- 003 0.0121 0.0000 r 3.0000e- , 005 r3.0000e- 005 0.0000 r 4.5000e- , 004 r1.7900e- 003 0.0000 r1.3000e- 004 r2.0000e- 005 0.0000 5.8000e- 004 r 1.8100e- 003 0.0000 r 1.4000e- 004 r 5.0000e- 004 0.0000 r 1.2000e- 004 r 2.0000e- , 005 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i -I r 2.6000e- i 0.0000 , 004 i i r 4 5.1000e- i 0.0000 , 004 i A 0.0000 7 2.4974 , 2.5206 0.0000 2.4974 2.5206 0.0000 r 2.3000e- , 004 8.0000e- , 005 0.0000 0.0000 , 0.0000 , 0.0000 t 2.5032 2.5227 Total 1.9400e- 003 0.0144 0.0149 6.0000e- 005 2.2400e- 003 1.5000e- 004 2.3900e- 003 6.4000e- 004 1.4000e- 004 7.7000e- 004 0.0000 5.0180 5.0180 3.1000e- 004 0.0000 5.0259 3.5 Paving - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr • Off -Road Paving T. •. •. ., 9.1800e- 003 ..- 3.6200e- 003 0.1027 , r 0.0658 r 1.1000e- 004 r , rr 5.5700e- 003 0.0000 5.5700e- , 003 0.0000 -, 5.1300e- 003 0.0000 5.1300e- i 0.0000 , 003 a i r i 0.0000 1 0.0000 i i 10.5524 0.0000 10.5524 r 0.0000 3.2300e- 003 r 0.0000 0.0000 , r t 0.0000 10.6332 0.0000 Total 0.0128 0.1027 0.0658 1.1000e- 004 5.5700e- 003 5.5700e- 003 5.1300e- 003 5.1300e- 003 0.0000 10.5524 ' 10.5524 3.2300e- 003 0.0000 10.6332 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 17 of 28 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Annual 3.5 Paving - 2017 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Date: 11/11/2016 3:26 PM Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 • 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor Worker w • w • • , 0.0000 3.9000e- 004 7 0.0000 3.1000e- 004 -, 0.0000 3.1300e- 003 -, 0.0000 �1.0000e- 005 7 0.0000 r, 7.1000e- 004 0.0000 r 0.0000 r 0.0000 7.2000e- , 004 r 0.0000 1.9000e- 004 r 0.0000 0.0000 i i i r 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 i i 4 1.9000e- 1 0.0000 004 j i , 0.0000 , 0.6554 0.0000 0.6554 - . 0.0000 . 2.0000e- 005 , 0.0000 0.0000 , 0.0000 0.6559 Total 3.9000e- 004 3.1000e- 004 3.1300e- 003 1.0000e- 005 7.1000e- 004 0.0000 7.2000e- 004 1.9000e- 004 0.0000 1.9000e- 004 0.0000 0.6554 0.6554 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.6559 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road • 9.1800e- . 0.1027 0.0658 1.1000e- 5.5700e- 5.5700e- 5.1300e- 5.1300e- + 0.0000 10.5524 10.5524 3.2300e- 0.0000 10.6332 003 004 003 003 003 003 1 003 , • n r r -, r , w -, , r 4 4 r r t Paving • 3.6200e- . 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 003 1 a Total 0.0128 0.1027 0.0658 1.1000e- 5.5700e- 5.5700e- 5.1300e• 5.1300e- 0.0000 10.5524 10.5524 3.2300e- 0.0000 10.6332 004 003 003 003 003 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 18 of 28 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Annual 3.5 Paving - 2017 Mitigated Construction Off -Site Date: 11/11/2016 3:26 PM 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile ROG NOx CO 302 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total - Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 . 1 r .,-, -. -. 7 r -1-, -, M 7 r Vendor • 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 l J Worker • 3.9000e- 3.1000e- 3.1300e- 1.0000e- r4.7000e- r 0.0000 4.7000e- 1.3000e- 0.0000 r 1.3000e- 1 0.0000 0.6554 0.6554 r2.0000e- 0.0000 0.6559 004 004 003 005 004 , 004 004 004 i 005 . y , Total 3.9000e- 3.1000e- 3.1300e- 1.0000e- 4.7000e- 0.0000 4.7000e- 1.3000e- 0.0000 1.3000e- 0.0000 0.6554 0.6554 2.0000e- 0.0000 0.6559 004 004 003 005 004 004 004 004 005 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 19 of 28 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Annual Date: 11/11/2016 3:26 PM ' ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Mitigated • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 i 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 : 0.0000 • 0.0000 i Unmitigated • 0.0000 T 0.0000 T 0.0000 T 0.0000 T 0.0000 T 0.0000 T 0.0000 0.0000 T 0.0000 T 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 T 0.0000 T 0.0000 T 0.0000 : 0.0000 4.2 Trip Summary Information 4.3 Trip Type Information _ Ave age Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday H -S or C -C Annual VMT Primary I Diverted I Annual VMT Other Asphalt Surfaces•0.00 8.40 6.90 : 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ••• Total I 0.00 0.00 0.00 I I 4.3 Trip Type Information 4.4 Fleet Mix Land Use I LDA I LDT1 I LDT2 I MDV I LHD1 I LI -1132 I MHD I HHD I OBUS I UBUS I MCY I SBUS I MH Other Asphalt Surfaces • 0.527920: 0.040740 • 0.182967 • 0.130733 • 0.020108 • 0.005812 • 0.016781 • 0.065303 • 0.001324 • 0.001284 • 0.004728 • 0.000989 • 0.001311 5.0 Energy Detail Historical Energy Use: N Miles Trip % Trip Purpose % Land Use H -W or C -W H -S or C -C 1 H -O or C -NW H -W or C -W H -S or C -C H -O or C -NW Primary I Diverted I Pass -by Other Asphalt Surfaces 16.60 8.40 6.90 : 0.00 0.00 0.00 : 0 0 0 4.4 Fleet Mix Land Use I LDA I LDT1 I LDT2 I MDV I LHD1 I LI -1132 I MHD I HHD I OBUS I UBUS I MCY I SBUS I MH Other Asphalt Surfaces • 0.527920: 0.040740 • 0.182967 • 0.130733 • 0.020108 • 0.005812 • 0.016781 • 0.065303 • 0.001324 • 0.001284 • 0.004728 • 0.000989 • 0.001311 5.0 Energy Detail Historical Energy Use: N CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy Page 20 of 28 Date: 11/11/2016 3:26 PM Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Annual Category ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total tons/yr Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e MT/yr Electricity : 0.0000 • 0.0000 : • 0.0000 : 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated , ; a Electricity . . 0.0000 • 0.0000 • . 0.0000 T 0.0000 1 • 0.0000 Unmitigated ; a 1 7 7 4 NaturalGas . 0.0000 . 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 r Y T 0.0000 • 0.0000 • • 0.0000 • 0.0000 I 0.0000 Mitigated ; a 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 : 0.0000 r 0.0000 0.0000 : 0.0000 0.0000 • 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 r 0.0000 . 0.0000 . 0.0000 • TT 4. TTT • a TT TNaturalGas 0.0000 T 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 . 0.0000 T 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 • 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated , • • 0.0000 0.0000 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O Cote Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr Other Asphalt Surfaces 0 2 a, 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 3 a a 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 21 of 28 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Annual 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Mitigated Date: 11/11/2016 3:26 PM 5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity Unmitigated NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 Cote Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr Other Asphalt Surfaces 0 2 + i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity Unmitigated Electricity Use Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Land Use I kWh/yr MT/yr Other Asphalt Surfaces • 0 2 1 A 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity Mitigated Page 22 of 28 Date: 11/11/2016 3:26 PM Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Annual 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area Electricity Use Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr Other Asphalt Surfaces 0 + a a 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2e 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr A Mitigated •• 9.5900e- • 1.0000e- . 1.5500e- . 0.0000 . • 1.0000e- • 1.0000e- . . 1.0000e- • 1.0000e- 003 005 003 ; 005 005 005 005 T T .1- 9.5900e- T 1.0000e- • 1.5500e- T 0.0000 T • 1.0000e- T 1.0000e- T -• 1.0000e- • 1.0000e- Unmitigated 003 005 003 005 005 005 005 a 0.0000 • 2.9800e- • 2.9800e- . 1.0000e- • 0.0000 • 3.1900e- j 003 003 005 ; 003 T T • 0.0000 • 2.9800e- T 2.9800e- T 1.0000e- • 0.0000 • 3.1900e- 003 003 005 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 23 of 28 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Annual 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated Date: 11/11/2016 3:26 PM Mitigated ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr Architectural • Coating it Consumer • Products w r Landscaping • 1.6700e- 003 7.7700e- 003 1.5000e- 004 r , r1.0000e- 005 r 1.5500e- 003 r 0.0000 r r 0.0000 r 0.0000 r1.0000e- 005 0.0000 r , 0.0000 r1.0000e- 005 r r , 0.0000 r 0.0000 r1.0000e- 005 0.0000 + 0.0000 + + r .. 0.0000 + 0.0000 + + 1 r 1.0000e- + 0.0000 005 + 0.0000 0.0000 2.9800e- 003 0.0000 r 0.0000 2.9800e- 003 0.0000 r 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 r t 0.0000 r 0.0000 T 0.0000 0.0000 3.1900e- 003 Total 9.5900e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.5500e- 003 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.9800e- 003 2.9800e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.1900.- 003 Mitigated 7.0 Water Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e ii.SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr Architectural • Coating Consumer • Products Landscaping • 1.6700e- 003 w 7.7700e- 003 n 1.5000e- 004 r r 1.0000e- , 005 rr r 1.5500e- 003 r -. r 0.0000 r -. 0.0000 0.0000 1.0000e- , 005 0.0000 r 0.0000 r 1.0000e- , 005 r r , 0.0000 r 0.0000 r 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 + 0.0000 + r • 0.0000 + 0.0000 + + r • 1.0000e- + 0.0000 005 + 0.0000 r 0.0000 2.9800e- - 003 0.0000 r 0.0000 2.9800e- 003 0.0000 r 0.0000 r 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 r t 0.0000 r t 0.0000 , 0.0000 0.0000 3.1900e- 003 Total 9.5900e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.5500e- 003 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.9800e- 003 2.9800e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.1900e- 003 7.0 Water Detail CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 24 of 28 Date: 11/11/2016 3:26 PM Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Annual 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 7.2 Water by Land Use Unmitigated Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category MT/yr Mitigated •: 0.0000 • 0.0000 ; 0.0000 i 0.0000 K -.- Unmitigated Unmitigated •: 0.0000 0.0000 : 0.0000 0.0000 7.2 Water by Land Use Unmitigated Indoor/Out door Use Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Land Use Mgal MT/yr Other Asphalt Surfaces 0 / 0 + 0.0000 +, a, 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 7.2 Water by Land Use Mitigated Page 25 of 28 Date: 11/11/2016 3:26 PM Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Annual 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste Category/Year Indoor/Out door Use Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Land Use Mgal MT/yr Other Asphalt Surfaces 0 / 0 + a, a 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste Category/Year Total CO2 CH4 N20 Cote MT/yr Mitigated :: 0.0000 ; 0.0000 i 0.0000 • 0.0000 t Unmitigated •: 0.0000 0.0000 T 0.0000 . 0.0000 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 8.2 Waste by Land Use Unmitigated Page 26 of 28 Date: 11/11/2016 3:26 PM Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Annual Mitigated Waste Disposed Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Land Use tons MT/yr Other Asphalt Surfaces i 0 2 a a 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day 1 Days/Year 1 Horse Power I Load Factor I Fuel Type Waste Disposed Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Land Use tons MT/yr Other Asphalt Surfaces . 0 2 a a 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day 1 Days/Year 1 Horse Power I Load Factor I Fuel Type CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 10.0 Stationary Equipment Page 27 of 28 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Annual Date: 11/11/2016 3:26 PM Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators Equipment Type 1 Number 1 Hours/Day 1 Hours/Year I Horse Power I Load Factor I Fuel Type Boilers Equipment Type INumber I Heat Input/Day I Heat Input/Year I Boiler Rating I Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type INumber 11.0 Vegetation CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 1.0 Project Characteristics Page 1 of 22 Date: 11/11/2016 3:23 PM Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Summer Pechanga Parkway Widening Riverside -South Coast County, Summer 1.1 Land Usage 1 Size 1 Other Asphalt Surfaces 120.15 1000sgft 2.76 120,151.00 0 Land Uses Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Climate Zone 10 Utility Company Southern California Edison Wind Speed (m/s) 2.4 CO2 Intensity 702.44 CH4 Intensity (Ib/MWhr) (IbIMWhr) 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non -Default Data 0.029 Precipitation Freq (Days) 28 Operational Year 2018 N20 Intensity (Ib/MWhr) 0.006 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 2 of 22 Date: 11/11/2016 3:23 PM Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Summer Project Characteristics - Land Use - Accounts for roadway expansion, curbs, gutters, median, bus turnout, sidewalks, and access ramps Construction Phase - Construction phase duration per project contractor Off-road Equipment - Off-road Equipment - Equipment list per project contractor Off-road Equipment - Construction equipment per project contractor Off-road Equipment - Equipment list per project contractor Off-road Equipment - Equipment list per project contractor Grading - Demolition - Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - SCAQMD Rule 403 Table Name tblConstDustMitigation tblConstDustMitigation tblConstructionPhase tblConstruction Phase tblConstruction Phase tblConstruction Phase tblConstruction Phase tblConstruction Phase tblConstruction Phase tblConstruction Phase tblConstruction Phase tblConstruction Phase tblConstruction Phase tblGrading Column Name C lean PavedRoad PercentReduction WaterUnpavedRoadVehicleSpeed NumDays NumDays NumDays PhaseEndDate PhaseEndDate PhaseEndDate PhaseEndDate PhaseStartDate PhaseStartDate PhaseStartDate PhaseStartDate MaterialExported 4- 4_ Y • 4- • T Y Default Value 0 40 220.00 20.00 6.00 10/25/2017 12/8/2016 12/21/2016 11/8/2017 12/22/2016 11/11/2016 12/14/2016 10/26/2017 New Value 40 15 10.00 15.00 10.00 5/19/2017 4/21/2017 5/5/2017 6/2/2017 5/6/2017 4/1/2017 4/22/2017 5/20/2017 • 0.00 1,973.00 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 3 of 22 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Summer Date: 11/11/2016 3:23 PM tblOffRoadEquipment tblOffRoadEquipment tblOffRoadEquipment tblOffRoadEquipment tblOffRoadEquipment tblOffRoadEquipment tblOffRoadEquipment tblOffRoadEquipment tblOffRoadEquipment tblOffRoadEquipment tblOffRoadEquipment tblOffRoadEquipment tblOffRoadEquipment tblOffRoadEquipment tblOffRoadEquipment tblOffRoadEquipment tblOffRoadEquipment tblOffRoadEquipment tblOffRoadEquipment tblOffRoadEquipment tblOffRoadEquipment tblOffRoadEquipment tblOffRoadEquipment tblOffRoadEquipment tblOffRoadEquipment tblOffRoadEquipment tblOffRoadEquipment LoadFactor 0.50 0.50 4 4 1 LoadFactor • 0.42 ii 0.42 LoadFactor Y 0.50 0.50 LoadFactor • 0.44 i 0.44 LoadFactor0.42 i 0.42 LoadFactor • i 0.42 i 0.42 4 LoadFactor 0.36 0.36 LoadFactor 0.38 i 0.38 i LoadFactor 0.30 + 0.30 4 4LoadFactor : 0.50 i 0.50 T OffRoadEquipmentType : + Trenchers OffRoadEquipmentTypet Other Construction Equipment OffRoadEquipmentType: t Trenchers OffRoadEquipmentType+ Off -Highway Tractors OffRoadEquipmentType t Other Construction Equipment OffRoadEquipmentTypei Other Construction Equipment OffRoadEquipmentTypet Paving Equipment OffRoadEquipmentType • t Rollers OffRoadEquipmentTypet Surfacing Equipment OffRoadEquipmentType + Trenchers OffRoadEquipmentType: i Surfacing Equipment OffRoadEquipmentType : i Other Construction Equipment : OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount • 1.00 i 0.00 OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount1.00 + 0.00 OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount :4 4 1.00 + 0.00 OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 t 0.00 4 OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount • 1.00 0.00 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 4 of 22 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Summer Date: 11/11/2016 3:23 PM tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount • 2.00 1.00 4 4 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 1 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment ▪ OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount • 1.00 + 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount T 3.00 + 1.00 tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount Y 2.00 t 1.00 tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount Y 1.00 t 0.00 ,I- 4 tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 0.00 2.0 Emissions Summary CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 5 of 22 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Summer 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) Unmitigated Construction Date: 11/11/2016 3:23 PM Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Year Ib/day Ib/day 2017 •w 2.6883 27.0750 18.5407 0.0374 3.0739 1.4401 4.3576 0.5052 1.3258 1.7115 1 0.0000 3,894.410 3,894.410 0.8605 0.0000 3,911.117 27.0750 + 0 0 1 • 1.1356 1.4401 2.4194 0.2018 1.3258 1.4542 i 0.0000 + i 3,894.410 0 3,894.410 0 0.8605 i . 3,911.117 1 Maximum 2.6883 27.0750 18.5407 Maximum 2.6883 27.0750 18.5407 0.0374 3.0739 1.4401 4.3576 0.5052 1.3258 1.7115 0.0000 3,894.410 3,894.410 0.8605 0.0000 3,911.117 0 0 1 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Year Ib/day Ib/day 2017 • 2.6883 27.0750 18.5407 0.0374 1.1356 1.4401 2.4194 0.2018 1.3258 1.4542 i 0.0000 + i 3,894.410 0 3,894.410 0 0.8605 0.0000 . 3,911.117 1 Maximum 2.6883 27.0750 18.5407 0.0374 1.1356 1.4401 2.4194 0.2018 1.3258 1.4542 0.0000 3,894.410 0 3,894.410 0 0.8605 0.0000 3,911.117 1 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 63.06 0.00 44.48 60.05 0.00 15.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 6 of 22 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Summer 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational Date: 11/11/2016 3:23 PM Mitigated Operational _ ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day Area Energy Mobile Mobile • ••-, • • n • • 0.0529 0.0000 0.0000 1.2000e- 004 r 0.0000 rr 0.0000 0.0124 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -, r 0.0000 0.0000 r -• 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 r -, 0.0000 0.0000 4.0000e- , 005 -, 0.0000 r -. 0.0000 , -• 0.0000 4.0000e- , 005 0.0000 r 0.0000 4.0000e- + , 005 + i r 4 0.0000 1 A r -• 0.0000 1 i i . 0.0263 , 0.0000 0.0000 0.0263 0.0000 r 0.0000 7.0000e- , 005 r 0.0000 r -r- 0.0000 , + r 0.0000 0.0281 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0529 1.2000e- 004 0.0124 0.0000 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 0.0263 0.0263 7.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0281 Mitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 Cote Category Ib/day Ib/day Area Energy Mobile • w • • 0.0529 0.0000 0.0000 1.2000e- , 004 r -. 0.0000 r 0.0000 0.0124 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 r 0.0000 0.0000 r -,-, 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 r 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 r 0.0000 r 0.0000 -,-,-, 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 r -.- 0.0000 0.0000 4.0000e- + , 005 y l 4 0.0000 1 t a r 4 0.0000 1 a A . 0.0263 7 0.0000 -, 0.0000 0.0263 0.0000 0.0000 7.0000e- 005 , r 0.0000 r 0.0000 , t 0.0000 t 0.0281 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0529 1.2000e- 004 0.0124 0.0000 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 0.0263 0.0263 7.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0281 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 7 of 22 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Summer Date: 11/11/2016 3:23 PM 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description Demolition 2 •Grading :Demolition :4/1/2017 :4/21/2017 ' 5' 15' T :Grading :4/22/2017 :5/5/2017 ' 5' 10: 4 4 3 :Building Construction :Building Construction .5/6/2017 :5/19/2017 : 5: 10: 1- 5/20/2017 .6/2/2017 5. 10 : 4 :Paving :Paving Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0 Acres of Paving: 2.76 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non -Residential Indoor: 0; Non -Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating - sqft) OffRoad Equipment Phase Name Demolition Paving Demolition Building Construction Building Construction Building Construction Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor :Trenchers 1 8.00 : H 1 I - •Cement and Mortar Mixers : 0 8.00: :Concrete/Industrial Saws . 11 8.00• : F 1 I - •Generator Sets : 0 8.00 :Cranes : 01 8.00: 4- + +- •Forklifts 0 7.00, 78: 9: 0.50 0.56 81: 0.73 84't 231: 0.74 0.29 89. 0.20 ROG NOx CO 502 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description Demolition 2 •Grading :Demolition :4/1/2017 :4/21/2017 ' 5' 15' T :Grading :4/22/2017 :5/5/2017 ' 5' 10: 4 4 3 :Building Construction :Building Construction .5/6/2017 :5/19/2017 : 5: 10: 1- 5/20/2017 .6/2/2017 5. 10 : 4 :Paving :Paving Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0 Acres of Paving: 2.76 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non -Residential Indoor: 0; Non -Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating - sqft) OffRoad Equipment Phase Name Demolition Paving Demolition Building Construction Building Construction Building Construction Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor :Trenchers 1 8.00 : H 1 I - •Cement and Mortar Mixers : 0 8.00: :Concrete/Industrial Saws . 11 8.00• : F 1 I - •Generator Sets : 0 8.00 :Cranes : 01 8.00: 4- + +- •Forklifts 0 7.00, 78: 9: 0.50 0.56 81: 0.73 84't 231: 0.74 0.29 89. 0.20 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 8 of 22 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Summer Date: 11/11/2016 3:23 PM • Demolition iOther Construction Equipment 1i 8.00i 1721 0.42 + +-------- -+ F Paving • Pavers u Or 8.00 . 130: 0.42 • Paving Rollers . 11 8.00. 80: 0.38 I F 1 ( I. - Demolition :Rubber Tired Dozers : Or 8.00. 247: 0.40 I 1- 1 ( • - Grading :Rubber Tired Dozers: Or 8.00. 247: 0.40 • Building Construction •Tractors/LoadersBackhoes . 11 6.00• 97: 0.37 = F i I- R Demolition •Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes : 11 8.00. 97: 0.37 • Grading •Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes . 11 7.00• 97: 0.37 = F i i. • - Paving :Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes : 1 i 8.00. 97: 0.37 • I. Grading :Trenchers I-11 8.00. 78: 0.50 • Grading :Graders I-01 8.00. 187: 0.41 Paving :Paving Equipment I-1 i 8.00• 132! 0.36 i• i i F - Grading :Off -Highway Tractors : 1 i 8.00. 124: 0.44 • Building Construction :Welders II- 01 8.00. 46: 0.45 • Grading :Other Construction Equipment . 1 1 8.00. 172: 0.42 Building Construction :Other Construction Equipment II- 11 8.00. 172: 0.42 Building Construction :Paving Equipment . 11 8.00. 132: 0.36 : I. Building Construction :Rollers . 11 8.00. 80: 0.38 Building Construction :Surfacing Equipment . 11 8.00. 263: 0.30 I. Building Construction :Trenchers . 11 8.00. 78: 0.50 S. Paving :Surfacing Equipment . 11 8.00. 263: 0.30 �- + • I. Paving :Other Construction Equipment 1: 8.00. 172: 0.42 Trips and VMT CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 9 of 22 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Summer Date: 11/11/2016 3:23 PM Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Building Construction • 6: Demolition • 41 • (- Grading •4 4 - Paving Paving 5; • 50.00 10.00 10.00 Hauling Trip Number Worker Trip Vendor Trip Length Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class 20.001 0.00: 14.701 6.90: 20.00: LD_Mix 1: HDT_Mix 1 HHDT 0.001 189.00: 14.701 6.90: 20.00:LD Mix IHDT_Mix 'HHDT 4 0.001 247.00, 14.701 6.90: 20.00!LD_Mix IHDT_Mix 1HHDT -1,- a_ + Y 4- 4 13.00: 0.00, 0.00. 14.70, 6.90: 20.00:LD_Mix ;HDT_Mix HHDT 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Use Soil Stabilizer Replace Ground Cover Water Exposed Area Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads Clean Paved Roads 3.2 Demolition - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day N Fugitive Dust 2.7416 0.0000 2.7416 0.4151 0.0000 0.4151 1 0.0000 0.0000 a n r r w -. • r T w r y Off -Road •. 2.0547 18.8455 13.0921 0.0189 1.2630 1.2630 1.1865 1.1865 1 1,882.890 T ,882.890r 0.4475 1,894.076 i 3 3 9 • 1 Total 2.0547 18.8455 13.0921 0.0189 2.7416 1.2630 4.0046 0.4151 1.1865 1.6016 1,882.890 1,882.890 0.4475 1,894.076 3 3 9 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 10 of 22 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Summer 3.2 Demolition - 2017 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Date: 11/11/2016 3:23 PM Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day Ib/day Hauling Vendor Worker • • • • 0.0873 • 0.0000 n-,7 0.0669 3.7429 r , 0.0000 x 0.0438 0.4456 , 0.0000 0.5613 9.8600e- 003 r 0.0000 x1.2100e- 003 0.2205 -, x 0.0000 x 0.1118 0.0201 0.0000 7.2000e- 004 0.2406 r , 0.0000 r 0.1125 , 0.0604 7 0.0000 r i 0.0296 . 0.0192 . 0.0000 • 6.6000e- ; 004 . 0.0797 I i it y = 0.0000 1 l r y • 0.0303 1 ; + 1 1,044.587 7 0.0000 120.7472 1,044.587 7 r 0.0000 x120.7472 0.0691 -, x 0.0000 x4.0500e- 003 + x T , 1,046.314 6 0.0000 120.8486 Total 0.1542 3.7867 1.0069 0.0111 0.3323 0.0208 0.3531 0.0901 0.0199 0.1100 1.3241 1,165.335 0 1,165.335 0 0.0731 0.4475 1,167.163 2 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day Fugitive Dust 0.9089 • 0.0000 • 0.9089 0.1376 0.0000 0.1376 i 0.0000 0.0000 i i l , r 4 • r r T Off -Road • x x 2.0547 18.8455 13.0921 •- r w -, •. 0.0189 • 1.2630 • 1.2630 1.1865 1.1865 I 0.0000 1,882.890 1,882.890 0.4475 1,894.076 + 3 3 9 i Total 2.0547 18.8455 13.0921 0.0189 0.9089 1.2630 2.1718 0.1376 1.1865 1.3241 0.0000 1,882.890 1,882.890 0.4475 1,894.076 3 3 9 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 11 of 22 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Summer 3.2 Demolition - 2017 Mitigated Construction Off -Site Date: 11/11/2016 3:23 PM 3.3 Grading - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day Ib/day Hauling Vendor Worker • • • • 0.0873 0.0000 0.0669 3.7429 r -.r 0.0000 0.0438 0.4456 0.0000 r 0.5613 9.8600e- 003 r -i 0.0000 r1.2100e- , 003 0.1538 0.0000 r 0.0729 0.0201 0.0000 7.2000e- 004 0.1739 r• 0.0000 r 0.0736 0.0441 r 0.0000 r 0.0201 0.0192 r 0.0000 r6.6000e- 004 0.0633 + i r y 0.0000 1 J t T 0.0208 1 i y 1,044.587 7 -, 0.0000 -ir4.0500e- 120.7472 1,044.587 7 0.0000 '- 120.7472 0.0691 0.0000 003 r t T , 1,046.314 6 0.0000 120.8486 Total 1.7732 0.1542 3.7867 1.0069 0.0111 0.2268 0.0208 0.2475 0.0642 0.0199 0.0841 1,725.939 1,165.335 0 1,165.335 0 0.0731 1,739.159 1,167.163 2 3.3 Grading - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day Fugitive Dust 0.0250 0.0000 0.0250 3.7800e- 0.0000 3.7800e- i 0.0000 0.0000 003 , , 003 1 _ l '1,725.939'1,725.939 Off -Road • 1.7732 r 18.0382 r 12.1476 r 0.0169 r 1.1229 r 1.1229 r r 1.0331 T 1.0331 1 1,725.939 1,725.939r 0.5288 '- T 1,739.159 i 2 2 , 8 Total 1.7732 18.0382 12.1476 0.0169 0.0250 1.1229 1.1479 3.7800e- 1.0331 1.0369 1,725.939 1,725.939 0.5288 1,739.159 003 2 2 8 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 12 of 22 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Summer 3.3 Grading - 2017 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Date: 11/11/2016 3:23 PM Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day . T Ib/day Hauling . Vendor Worker • nr • 0.1712 M 0.0000 0.0669 7.3372 rr 0.0000 0.0438 0.8734 x 0.0000 x 0.5613 0.0193 0.0000 x1.2100e- 003 0.4322 r = 0.0000 r 0.1118 0.0394 x 0.0000 7.2000e- , 004 0.4716 r 0.0000 x 0.1125 0.1185 r 0.0000 x 0.0296 0.0377 x 0.0000 6.6000e- 004 , 0.1562 i 1 r 4 0.0000 i i i • r 0.0303 + 1 i 2,047.723 6 r 1 0.0000 120.7472 2,047.723 6 0.0000 x120.7472 0.1354 '1 x 0.0000 x4.0500e- 003 T x T , 2,051.108 7 0.0000 120.8486 Total 0.2381 7.3811 1.4348 0.0205 0.5440 0.0401 0.5841 0.1481 0.0383 0.1865 1.0343 2,168.470 8 2,168.470 8 0.1395 0.5288 2,171.957 3 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day Fugitive Dust 8.2800e- 0.0000 8.2800e- 1.2500e- 0.0000 . 1.2500e- + 0.0000 0.0000 003 , 003 003 003 1 a • n x r r r r r r 1 -i r r T Off -Road • 1.7732 r 18.0382 12.1476 0.0169 x 1.1229 1.1229 1.0331 • 1.0331 j 0.0000 1,725.939 1,725.939 0.5288 1,739.159 1 2 2 8 i Total 1.7732 18.0382 12.1476 0.0169 8.2800e- 1.1229 1.1312 1.2500e- 1.0331 1.0343 0.0000 1,725.939 1,725.939 0.5288 1,739.159 003 003 2 2 8 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 13 of 22 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Summer 3.3 Grading - 2017 Mitigated Construction Off -Site Date: 11/11/2016 3:23 PM 3.4 Building Construction - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day w Ib/day Hauling Vendor Worker • 0.1712 • 0.0000 1,- • 0.0669 • 7.3372 0.0000 T 0.0438 0.8734 T 0.0000 T 0.5613 • 0.0193 r 0.0000 •1.2100e- 003 0.3016 T 0.0000 T 0.0729 0.0394 T 0.0000 T7.2000e- 004 0.3409 T 0.0000 T 0.0736 0.0864 T 0.0000 T 0.0201 0.0377 T 0.0000 T6.6000e- 004 0.1241 i + i T 0.0000 I i y T 0.0208 i i i . 2,047.723 6 0.0000 120.7472 2,047.723 6 T 0.0000 T120.7472 i 0.1354 r 0.0000 -• r4.0500e- : 003 , T T T 2,051.108 7 0.0000 120.8486 Total 0.2381 7.3811 1.4348 0.0205 0.3745 0.0401 0.4146 0.1065 0.0383 0.1449 1.4111 2,168.470 8 2,168.470 8 0.1395 1.2982 2,171.957 3 3.4 Building Construction - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day A Off -Road • 2.2697 24.2535 15.2035 0.0252 1.4111 1.4111 1.2982 1.2982 1 2,581.330 2,581.330 0.7909 2,601.103 i 4 , 4 , , 3 • i Total 2.2697 24.2535 15.2035 0.0252 1.4111 1.4111 1.2982 1.2982 2,581.330 2,581.330 0.7909 2,601.103 4 4 3 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 14 of 22 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Summer 3.4 Building Construction - 2017 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Date: 11/11/2016 3:23 PM Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day Ib/day i 4 4 , 3 Hauling Vendor Worker • .1 it • • 0.0000 0.0843 -,-y 0.3343 . 0.0000 i .1".. r 2.6024 . 0.2191 0.0000 0.5305 '- 2.8067 0.0000 r 5.3100e- , 003 6.0700e- 003 0.0000 r 0.1281 , '- 0.5589 0.0000 r 0.0254 3.5800e- 003 0.0000 r 0.1535 '- 0.5625 0.0000 r 0.0369 '- 0.1482 0.0000 r 0.0243 '-3.3000e- 003 0.0000 i i i r t 0.0612 1 ft 1 i i r 0.1515 1 i i 0.0000 .-559.1294 603.7362 0.0000 r 559.1294 '-603.7362 0.0000 r -I 0.0493 '- 0.0203 T r T i 0.0000 . 560.3618 604.2430 Total 2.2697 0.4186 2.8215 3.3372 0.0114 0.6870 0.0290 0.7160 0.1851 0.0276 0.2127 2,581.330 1,162.865 6 1,162.865 6 0.0696 2,601.103 1,164.604 7 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road • 2.2697 24.2535 15.2035 0.0252 1.4111 1.4111 1.2982 1.2982 + 0.0000 2,581.330 2,581.330 0.7909 2,601.103 i 4 4 , 3 i Total 2.2697 24.2535 15.2035 0.0252 1.4111 1.4111 1.2982 1.2982 0.0000 2,581.330 2,581.330 0.7909 2,601.103 4 4 3 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 15 of 22 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Summer 3.4 Building Construction - 2017 Mitigated Construction Off -Site Date: 11/11/2016 3:23 PM 3.5 Paving - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i Vendor I. r r r r•r r r r i 0.0843 2.6024 r 0.5305 5.3100e- 0.0916 0.0254 0.1170 r 0.0279 0.0243 0.0522 i 559.1294 ' 559.1294 r 0.0493 T 560.3618 003 , y a Worker _ • r 4 w -, -, -, 0.3343 r 0.2191 r 2.8067 6.0700e- r 0.3645 3.5800e- r 0.3681 0.1005 3.3000e- r 0.1038 1 603.7362 603.7362 r 0.0203 T 604.2430 003 , , 003 , , 003 , y Total 2.5589 20.5337 Total 0.0228 0.4186 2.8215 3.3372 0.0114 0.4561 0.0290 0.4851 0.1284 0.0276 0.1561 1,162.865 1,162.865 0.0696 1,164.604 9 9 6 6 7 3.5 Paving - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road • 1.8358 20.5337 13.1558 . 0.0228 . 1.1148 1.1148 1.0257 1.0257 1 2,326.400 2,326.400 0.7128 2,344.221 i 9 , 9 , 1 i Paving n r ' r r -e r 4 r r -e- • 0.7231 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 i 1 Total 2.5589 20.5337 13.1558 0.0228 1.1148 1.1148 1.0257 1.0257 2,326.400 2,326.400 0.7128 2,344.221 9 9 1 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 16 of 22 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Summer 3.5 Paving - 2017 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Date: 11/11/2016 3:23 PM Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling Vendor Worker • w • 0.0000 Mr 0.0000 -r 0.0869 0.0000 r 0.0000 r 0.0570 0.0000 r 0.0000 0.7297 0.0000 l 0.0000 r1.5800e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 r 0.1453 0.0000 r 0.0000 r 9.3000e- 004 0.0000 r 0.0000 r 0.1462 0.0000 r l 0.0000 r 0.0385 0.0000 0.0000 r8.6000e- 004 0.0000 i i i r 4 0.0000 i i I 4 r 0.0394 + i • 0.0000 l 0.0000 156.9714 0.0000 0.0000 r 156.9714 0.0000 7 r 0.0000 r5.2700e- 003 T T , 0.0000 0.0000 157.1032 Total 0.0869 0.0570 0.7297 1.5800e- 003 0.1453 9.3000e- 004 0.1462 0.0385 8.6000e- 004 0.0394 2.5589 156.9714 156.9714 5.2700e- 003 157.1032 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road • 1.8358 20.5337 13.1558 0.0228 1.1148 1.1148 . 1.0257 1.0257 I 0.0000 2,326.400 2,326.400 0.7128 2,344.221 1 9 9 1 L , , , r ' , , r i a r r t Paving • 0.7231 0.0000 0.0000 • 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i I Total 2.5589 20.5337 13.1558 0.0228 1.1148 1.1148 1.0257 1.0257 0.0000 2,326.400 2,326.400 0.7128 2,344.221 9 9 1 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 17 of 22 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Summer 3.5 Paving - 2017 Mitigated Construction Off -Site Date: 11/11/2016 3:23 PM 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day A Hauling • 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 J J Vendor r -. r -. -. r r r • r r -. r • 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 r 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 J r r r r -I,• r r • r9.3000e- r5.2700e- r Worker 0.0869 0.0570 0.7297 1.5800e- 0.0948 0.0957 0.0261 8.6000e- 0.0270 I 156.9714 156.9714 157.1032 003 004 , 004 ± 003 , • y Total 0.0869 0.0570 0.7297 1.5800e- 0.0948 9.3000e- 0.0957 0.0261 8.6000e- 0.0270 156.9714 156.9714 5.2700e- 157.1032 003 004 004 003 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile CatEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 18 of 22 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Summer Date: 11/11/2016 3:23 PM 4.2 Trip Summary Information ROG • NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day Mitigated •• 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 ± 0.0000 i 0.0000 • 0.0000 0.0000 i -• r Unmitigated • 0.0000 0.0000 T 0.0000 T 0.0000 T 0.0000 T 0.0000 T 0.0000 T 0.0000 T 0.0000 T 0.0000 • • 0.0000 T 0.0000 T 0.0000 T • 0.0000 4.2 Trip Summary Information 4.3 Trip Type Information Ave age Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Trip % Mitigated Land Use Trip Purpose % Weekday Saturday Sunday H -S or C -C Annual VMT H -W or C -W Annual VMT Other Asphalt Surfaces•0.00 Primary I Diverted 0.00 0.00 •• 6.90 • 0.00 Total 0.00 0 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 I I 4.3 Trip Type Information 4.4 Fleet Mix Land Use I LDA I LDT1 I LDT2 I MDV I LHD1 I LHD2 I MHD I HHD I OBUS I UBUS I MCY I SBUS I MH Other Asphalt Surfaces : 0.527920• 0.040740: 0.182967: 0.130733: 0.020108: 0.005812: 0.016781: 0.065303: 0.001324: 0.001284: 0.004728 • 0.000989: 0.001311 5.0 Energy Detail Historical Energy Use: N Miles Trip % Trip Purpose % Land Use H -W or C -W H -S or C -C H -O or C -NW H -W or C -W H -S or C -C H -O or C -NW Primary I Diverted Pass -by Other Asphalt Surfaces 16.60 8.40 6.90 • 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 4.4 Fleet Mix Land Use I LDA I LDT1 I LDT2 I MDV I LHD1 I LHD2 I MHD I HHD I OBUS I UBUS I MCY I SBUS I MH Other Asphalt Surfaces : 0.527920• 0.040740: 0.182967: 0.130733: 0.020108: 0.005812: 0.016781: 0.065303: 0.001324: 0.001284: 0.004728 • 0.000989: 0.001311 5.0 Energy Detail Historical Energy Use: N CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy Page 19 of 22 Date: 11/11/2016 3:23 PM Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Summer 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day NaturalGas . 0.0000 . 0.0000 , 0.0000 . 0.0000 . . 0.0000 . 0.0000 . , 0.0000 . 0.0000 1 . 0.0000 . 0.0000 , 0.0000 . 0.0000 . 0.0000 Mitigated , , , 1 • i .TTTT TT i 'T TNaturalGas .0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 T 0.0000 T 0.0000 T 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 T 0.0000 0.0000 . 0.0000 Unmitigated 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr Ib/day Ib/day Other Asphalt Surfaces . 0 2 +, A 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 1 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 20 of 22 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Summer 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Mitigated Date: 11/11/2016 3:23 PM 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr Ib/day Ib/day Other Asphalt 0 2 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Surfaces i.4 4. i Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day Mitigated . 0.0529 . 1.2000e- , 0.0124 . 0.0000 . . 4.0000e- . 4.0000e- . . 4.0000e- . 4.0000e- i . 0.0263 . 0.0263 . 7.0000e- . . 0.0281 004 : 005 005 005 005 ± 005 i T T ♦ r Unmitigated . 0.0529 T 1.2000e- T 0.0124 T 0.0000 • . 4.0000e- T 4.0000e- T T 4.0000e- T 4.0000e- • • 0.0263 T 0.0263 T 7.0000e- T . 0.0281 004 005 005 005 005 005 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 21 of 22 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Summer 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated Date: 11/11/2016 3:23 PM Mitigated ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e SubCategory Ib/day Ib/day Architectural • Coating it Consumer • Products w r Landscaping • 9.1500e- 003 0.0426 1.1900e- 003 . r • r1.2000e- 004 r r 0.0124 r r 0.0000 r 0.0000 r 0.0000 r 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 r 0.0000 r 4.0000e- � 005 r 0.0000 r 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 j a 3 r • 0.0000 1 a a 4 r 4.0000e- a 005 a 0.0263 0.0000 , r 0.0000 • 0.0263 7.0000e- 005 r t r t , 0.0000 0.0000 0.0281 Total 0.0529 1.2000e- 004 0.0124 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 0.0263 0.0263 7.0000e- 005 0.0281 Mitigated 7.0 Water Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e SubCategory Ib/day Ib/day Architectural • Coating Consumer Products Landscaping • 9.1500e- 003 • 0.0426 1.1900e- 003 , r -. 1.2000e- 004 -. 7 0.0124 0.0000 r rr 0.0000 r 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 r -, 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 -. 7 0.0000 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 i a a r 4 0.0000 i a a r 4 4.0000e- I 005 a a -, 0.0263 0.0000 0.0000 r 0.0263 r -1 7.0000e- 005 t t , 0.0000 0.0000 0.0281 Total 0.0529 1.2000e- 004 0.0124 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 0.0263 0.0263 7.0000e- 005 0.0281 7.0 Water Detail CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 22 of 22 Date: 11/11/2016 3:23 PM Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Summer 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day 1 Days/Year Horse Power I Load Factor I Fuel Type 10.0 Stationary Equipment Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators Equipment Type INumber I Hours/Day Hours/Year 1 Horse Power I Load Factor I Fuel Type Boilers Equipment Type Number I Heat Input/Day I Heat Input/Year I Boiler Rating I Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number 11.0 Vegetation CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 1.0 Project Characteristics Page 1 of 23 Date: 12/8/2016 9:12 AM Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Winter Pechanga Parkway Widening Riverside -South Coast County, Winter 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Other Asphalt Surfaces 1 Size 1 Metric I Lot Acreage I Floor Surface Area I Population 120.15 1000sgft 2.76 120,151.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Climate Zone 10 Utility Company Southern California Edison Wind Speed (m/s) 2.4 CO2 Intensity 702.44 CH4 Intensity (Ib/MWhr) (Ib/MWhr) 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non -Default Data 0.029 Precipitation Freq (Days) 28 Operational Year 2018 N20 Intensity (Ib/MWhr) 0.006 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 2 of 23 Date: 12/8/2016 9:12 AM Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Winter Project Characteristics - Land Use - Accounts for roadway expansion, curbs, gutters, median, bus turnout, sidewalks, and access ramps Construction Phase - Construction phase duration per project contractor Off-road Equipment - Off-road Equipment - Equipment list per project contractor Off-road Equipment - Construction equipment per project contractor Off-road Equipment - Equipment list per project contractor Off-road Equipment - Equipment list per project contractor Demolition - Grading - Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - SCAQMD Rule 403 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 3 of 23 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Winter Date: 12/8/2016 9:12 AM Table Name tblConstDustM itigation tblConstDustM itigation tblConstructionPhase tblConstructionPhase tblConstructionPhase tblGrading tblLandUse tblLandUse tblOffRoadEquipment tblOffRoadEquipment tblOffRoadEquipment tblOffRoadEquipment tblOffRoadEquipment tblOffRoadEquipment tblOffRoadEquipment tblOffRoadEquipment tblOffRoadEquipment tblOffRoadEquipment tblOffRoadEquipment tblOffRoadEquipment Column Name Default Value New Value • CleanPavedRoadPercentReduction 0 1 40 i • WaterUnpavedRoadVehicleSpeed 40 t 15 NumDays • 220.00 t 10.00 NumDays 20.00 + 15.00 NumDays Y 6.00 t 10.00 MaterialExported 0.00 t 1,973.00 BuildingSpaceSquareFeet 120,150.00 f 120,151.00 LandUseSquareFeet • 120,150.00 + 120,151.00 OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount • 1.00 + 0.00 OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount • 1.00 i 0.00 OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount Y 2.00 i 0.00 OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 -it 0.00 OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount • 1.00 + 0.00 • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount Y 2.00 t 1.00 OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount • 1.00 t 0.00 OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount Y 1.00 + 0.00 OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 t 1.00 OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 t 1.00 r 4 OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 0.00 2.0 Emissions Summary CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 4 of 23 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Winter 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) Unmitigated Construction Date: 12/8/2016 9:12 AM Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Year Ib/day Ib/day 2016 •, 2.8842 29.2360 18.7019 0.0371 3.0739 1.5508 4.4686 0.5052 1.4280 1.8174 I 0.0000 3,887.173 3,887.173 0.8728 0.0000 3,904.551 + 1 1 7 t r r r r r r r r r y r "-2,467.274 2017 .. 2.6437 20.5928 13.7509 0.0242 0.1453 1.1158 1.2611 r 0.0385 1.0265 1.0651 ± 0.0000 2,467.274 2,467.274 0.7174 r 0.0000 2,485.209 t 3 , 3 7 •, 1.5508 r 1.1158 2.6358 r 1.2611 0.2277 r 0.0385 1.4280 r 1.0265 1.6131 i 0.0000 t A r y 1.0651 1 0.0000 A t 3,887.173 1 2,467.274_ 3 3,887.173 1 2,467.274 3 0.8728 r 0.7174 0.0000 r 0.0000 T t Maximum 2.8842 29.2360 18.7019 0.0371 Maximum 2.8842 29.2360 18.7019 0.0371 3.0739 1.5508 4.4686 0.5052 1.4280 1.8174 0.0000 3,887.173 3,887.173 0.8728 0.0000 3,904.551 1 1 7 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Year Ib/day Ib/day 2016 • . 2017 • • 2.8842 � 2.6437 29.2360 20.5928 18.7019 13.7509 0.0371 r 0.0242 1.2411 r 0.1453 1.5508 r 1.1158 2.6358 r 1.2611 0.2277 r 0.0385 1.4280 r 1.0265 1.6131 i 0.0000 t A r y 1.0651 1 0.0000 A t 3,887.173 1 2,467.274_ 3 3,887.173 1 2,467.274 3 0.8728 r 0.7174 0.0000 r 0.0000 T 3,904.551 7 2,485.209 7 Maximum 2.8842 29.2360 18.7019 0.0371 1.2411 1.5508 2.6358 0.2277 1.4280 1.6131 0.0000 3,887.173 1 3,887.173 1 0.8728 0.0000 3,904.551 7 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 56.93 0.00 31.99 51.04 0.00 7.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 5 of 23 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Winter 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational Date: 12/8/2016 9:12 AM Mitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day A Ib/day 1 Area Energy Mobile • .,r • n • 0.0529 0.0000 0.0000 1.2000e- 004 r 0.0000 r 0.0000 0.0124 r 0.0000 r -. 0.0000 0.0000 r 0.0000 0.0000 r-, 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 r 0.0000 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 r 0.0000 0.0000 r r 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 r 0.0000 r 0.0000 4.0000e- + 005 + r 0.0000 i r 0.0000 1 0.0263 0.0000 -, 0.0000 0.0263 r 0.0000 0.0000 7.0000e- 005 -1.1 r 0.0000 r -.-a 0.0000 0.0000 s 0.0281 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0529 1.2000e- 004 0.0124 0.0000 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 Total 0.0263 0.0263 7.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0281 Mitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day Area • 0.0529 1.2000e- 0.0124 0.0000 4.0000e- 4.0000e- 4.0000e- 4.0000e- +0.0263 0.0263 7.0000e- 0.0281 004 005 005 , , 005 , 005 + 005 , r r r r r r r r -.r r r • t Energy • 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 . 0.0000 r r r , r - r i r r r r Mobile • 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ? 0.0000 Total 0.0529 1.2000e- 0.0124 0.0000 0.0000 4.0000e- 4.0000e- 0.0000 4.0000e- 4.0000e- 0.0263 0.0263 7.0000e- 0.0000 0.0281 004 005 005 005 005 005 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 6 of 23 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Winter Date: 12/8/2016 9:12 AM 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 •Demolition :Demolition '11/11/2016 :12/1/2016 ' 5' 15' 1 1 4 4 4 4 2 :Grading :Grading ' 12/2/2016 :12/15/2016 : 5' 10' s 1 1 44 4 4 3 :Building Construction :Building Construction .12/16/2016 112/29/2016 ' 5' 101 + 4. -' 4 :Paving :Paving '12/30/2016 '1/12/2017 5: 10: Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0 Acres of Paving: 2.76 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non -Residential Indoor: 0; Non -Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating - sqft) OffRoad Equipment Phase Name Demolition Demolition Demolition Demolition Demolition Grading Offroad Equipment Type I Amount ;Concrete/Industrial Saws ' C i - :Other Construction Equipment ' :Rubber Tired Dozers F 1 1- • Tractors/LoadersBackhoes H • Trenchers ;Graders 11 11 of 11 Usage Hours I Horse Power I 8.00' ----4 Load Factor 81' 0.73 8.00' 172 11 4- 8.00: 247' F 1. 8.00. 97' F 8.00 , 78: 4 0: 8.00: 187: 0.42 0.40 0.37 0.50 0.41 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 •Demolition :Demolition '11/11/2016 :12/1/2016 ' 5' 15' 1 1 4 4 4 4 2 :Grading :Grading ' 12/2/2016 :12/15/2016 : 5' 10' s 1 1 44 4 4 3 :Building Construction :Building Construction .12/16/2016 112/29/2016 ' 5' 101 + 4. -' 4 :Paving :Paving '12/30/2016 '1/12/2017 5: 10: Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0 Acres of Paving: 2.76 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non -Residential Indoor: 0; Non -Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating - sqft) OffRoad Equipment Phase Name Demolition Demolition Demolition Demolition Demolition Grading Offroad Equipment Type I Amount ;Concrete/Industrial Saws ' C i - :Other Construction Equipment ' :Rubber Tired Dozers F 1 1- • Tractors/LoadersBackhoes H • Trenchers ;Graders 11 11 of 11 Usage Hours I Horse Power I 8.00' ----4 Load Factor 81' 0.73 8.00' 172 11 4- 8.00: 247' F 1. 8.00. 97' F 8.00 , 78: 4 0: 8.00: 187: 0.42 0.40 0.37 0.50 0.41 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 7 of 23 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Winter Date: 12/8/2016 9:12 AM Grading •Off -Highway Tractors 1 : 8.00:.1241 0.44 % 1-1-- 4 E Grading :Other Construction Equipment : 11 8.00. 172: 0.42 s 1- 1 (- Grading :Rubber Tired Dozers : 0 i 8.00. 247: 0.40 i F 1 1 - Grading •Tractors/LoadersBackhoes 1 i 7.00: 97: 0.37 = F 1 (- Grading :Trenchers : 1 i 8.00: 78: 0.50 Building Construction :Cranes I-01 8.00,I- .00. 231: 0.29 i 1- 1 1 - Building Construction :Forklifts : 0i 7.00, 89: 0.20 Building Construction :Generator Sets I-01 8.00. 84: 0.74 Building Construction :Other Construction Equipment I-11 8.00.I- .00. 172: 0.42 = 1- 1 1- Building Construction :Paving Equipment : 1 i 8.00. 132: 0.36 Building Construction :Rollers F -1i 8.00. 80: 0.38 Building Construction :Surfacing Equipment I -1i 8.00. 263: 0.30 t F 1(- Building Construction •Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes : 1 i 6.00. 97: 0.37 Building Construction :Trenchers I-1 1 8.00 • 78: 0.50 Building Construction :Welders I-01 8.00.I- .00• 46: 0.45 = 1- 1 (- Paving :Cement and Mortar Mixers : 0i 8.00. 9: 0.56 I. Paving :Other Construction Equipment I-11 8.00. 172: 0.42 I H 1 I- 1• Paving :Pavers : 0 i 8.00. 130: 0.42 i. Paving :Paving Equipment I-11 8.00. 132: 0.36 i F 1 H 1 Paving :Rollers : 1 8.00. 80: 0.38 1. Paving :Surfacing Equipment . 1 8.00. 263: 0.30 :- + � 1 - Paving •Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1: 8.00' 97 0.37 Trips and VMT CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 8 of 23 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Winter Date: 12/8/2016 9:12 AM Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length 1 1 1 1 Demolition 4' 10.00' 0.00 189.00'' 14.70' 6.90' 20.00' LD - , Mix 'HDT- Mix 'HHDT ' I ' , Grading • 4 F 10.00: 0.00' 247.00: 1470' 6.90: 20.00: LD Mix I HDT Mix 'HHDT 4 Building Construction : 6' 50.00: 20.001 0.00: 14.70 6.90: 20.00:LD_Mix :HDT Mix 'HHDT 1- + 4- T 4- 4- T 4- + Paving • 5' 13.00' 0.00' 0.00' 14.70' 6.90' 20.00'LD_Mix 'HDT_Mix :HHDT • Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Use Soil Stabilizer Replace Ground Cover Water Exposed Area Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads 3.2 Demolition - 2016 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day Fugitive Dust 2.7416 0.0000 2.7416 0.4151 0.0000 0.4151 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 i w -. w r-. r r • T Off -Road • 2.1973 20.0369 13.2079 0.0189 1.3601 1.3601 1.2790 1.2790 i 1,909.174 1,909.174 0.4545 1,920.535 I 0 0 , 6 j Total 2.1973 20.0369 13.2079 0.0189 2.7416 1.3601 4.1017 0.4151 1.2790 1.6941 1,909.174 1,909.174 0.4545 1,920.535 0 0 6 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 9 of 23 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Winter 3.2 Demolition - 2016 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Date: 12/8/2016 9:12 AM Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category , Ib/day Ib/day Ib/day Hauling Vendor Worker • • • 0.1141 w- 0.0000 w- 0.0728 4.1991 x 0.0000 r 0.0521 0.6048 r 0.0000 0.5211 9.6900e- 003 r 0.0000 1.1200e- , 003 0.2205 , x 0.0000 x 0.1118 , 0.0339 r 0.0000 7.4000e- 004 0.2544 r 0.0000 -r-r4 x 0.1125 , • 0.0605 r 0.0000 x 0.0296 0.0324 x 0.0000 6.9000e- , 004 0.0929 a 1 i r -6r 0.0000 i i A T 0.0303 t j A 1,026.039 7 0.0000 111.2826 1,026.039 7 0.0000 x111.2826 0.0810 r 0.0000 x4.0400e- 003 r t x T , 1,028.065 6 0.0000 111.3836 Total 0.0189 0.1869 4.2512 1.1259 0.0108 0.3323 0.0347 0.3669 0.0901 0.0331 0.1232 1,137.322 3 1,137.322 3 0.0851 1,139.449 2 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO 502 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day , Ib/day Fugitive Dust • • Off -Road • • w r 2.1973 20.0369 13.2079 0.0189 0.9089 0.0000 r 1.3601 0.9089 1.3601 0.1376 0.0000 1.2790 0.1376 i A A r y 1.2790 1 0.0000 + A 1,909.174'1 0 0.0000 ,909.174r , 0 0.4545 r T 0.0000 1,920.535 6 Total 2.1973 20.0369 13.2079 0.0189 0.9089 1.3601 2.2689 0.1376 1.2790 1.4166 0.0000 1,909.174 0 1,909.174 0 0.4545 1,920.535 6 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 10 of 23 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Winter 3.2 Demolition - 2016 Mitigated Construction Off -Site Date: 12/8/2016 9:12 AM 3.3 Grading - 2016 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day Ib/day Hauling Vendor Worker A • w r • • . 0.1141 0.0000 0.0728 4.1991 r 0.0000 0.0521 0.6048 0.0000 r 0.5211 9.6900e- 003 r 0.0000 r1.1200e- 003 0.2205 , r 0.0000 r 0.1118 , 0.0339 r 0.0000 r7.4000e- 004 , 0.2544 r 0.0000 r 0.1125 0.0605 r 0.0000 -. r 0.0296 0.0324 0.0000 6.9000e- 004 0.0929 1 j i r y 0.0000 1 1J J 4 r 0.0303 t j t 1,026.039 7 -, 0.0000 111.2826 1,026.039 7 0.0000 111.2826 0.0810 -, r 0.0000 r4.0400e- 003 t T , 1,028.065 6 0.0000 111.3836 Total 0.0170 0.1869 4.2512 1.1259 0.0108 0.3323 0.0347 0.3669 0.0901 0.0331 0.1232 1,137.322 3 1,137.322 3 0.0851 1,139.449 2 3.3 Grading - 2016 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day Fugitive Dust • Off -Road • • 1.8844 19.3488 12.2855 r 0.0170 . 0.0250 r i 0.0000 1.2018 0.0250 r 1.2018 3.7800e- 003 0.0000 , 1.1056 ■ 3.7800e- 1 003 + a r 4 1.1056 i 1 4 1,764.527 0 0.0000 1,764.527 , 0 r 0.5322 r T 0.0000 1,777.833 , 1 Total 1.8844 19.3488 12.2855 0.0170 0.0250 1.2018 1.2268 3.7800e- 003 1.1056 1.1094 1,764.527 0 1,764.527 0 0.5322 1,777.833 1 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 11 of 23 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Winter 3.3 Grading - 2016 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Date: 12/8/2016 9:12 AM Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 0114 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day Ib/day Hauling 0.2237 8.2316 1.1855 0.0190 0.4322 0.0665 0.4987 0.1185 0.0636 0.1821 i 2,011.363 2,011.363 0.1589 2,015.334 • , 003 , 003 , 003 , 003 + + 5 5 9 Vendor • • 0.0000 r 0.0000 0.0000 r 0.0000 0.0000 T 0.0000 r 0.0000 r 0.0000 0.0000 T 0.0000 I 0.0000 It r 0.0000 r 0.0000 T 0.0000 J Worker • • 0.0728 w 0.0521 0.5211 r1.1200e- r 0.1118 r7.4000e- r 0.1125 r 0.0296 6.9000e- T 0.0303 I 111.2826 111.2826 r4.0400e- T 111.3836 . 1 003 , 0 004 , 1 , 004 i y 19.3488 12.2855 , 003 , 1.2018 Total 1.2500e- 0.2965 8.2837 1.7067 0.0201 0.5440 0.0672 0.6112 0.1481 0.0643 0.2124 2,122.646 2,122.646 0.1629 2,126.718 003 0 0 1 1 1 5 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day A Fugitive Dust • 8.2800e- 0.0000 8.2800e- 1.2500e- 0.0000 1.2500e- i 0.0000 0.0000 • , 003 , 003 , 003 , 003 + Off -Road • 1.8844 19.3488 12.2855 0.0170 r 1.2018 r 1.2018 r 1.1056 T 1.1056 1 0.0000 1,764.527 1,764.527,- ,764.527r 0.5322 T 1,777.833 • 1 0 , 0 1 Total 1.8844 19.3488 12.2855 0.0170 8.2800e- 1.2018 1.2101 1.2500e- 1.1056 1.1069 0.0000 1,764.527 1,764.527 0.5322 1,777.833 003 003 0 0 1 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 12 of 23 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Winter 3.3 Grading - 2016 Mitigated Construction Off -Site Date: 12/8/2016 9:12 AM 3.4 Building Construction - 2016 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day Ib/day Hauling Vendor Worker • 0.2237 • 0.0000 0.0728 8.2316 0.0000 0.0521 1.1855 0.0000 0.5211 0.0190 0.0000 1.1200e- 003 0.4322 0.0000 0.1118 , 0.0665 0.0000 7.4000e- , 004 , 0.4987 = 0.0000 r 0.1125 0.1185 r 0.0000 r 0.0296 0.0636 0.0000 6.9000e- , 004 0.1821 i + i 0.0000 1 i i T 0.0303 1 1 i . 2,011.363 5 0.0000 111.2826 2,011.363 5 0.0000 111.2826 0.1589 0.0000 r4.0400e- 003 , 2,015.334 9 0.0000 T 111.3836 Total 0.2965 8.2837 1.7067 0.0201 0.5440 0.0672 0.6112 0.1481 0.0643 0.2124 1.5137 2,122.646 1 2,122.646 1 0.1629 2,126.718 5 3.4 Building Construction - 2016 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day A Off -Road • 2.4162 26.1621 15.4081 0.0253 1.5137 1.5137 1.3926 1.3926 1 2,630.378 2,630.378 0.7934 2,650.214 i 6 6 0 i Total 2.4162 26.1621 15.4081 0.0253 1.5137 1.5137 1.3926 1.3926 2,630.378 2,630.378 0.7934 2,650.214 6 6 0 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 13 of 23 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Winter 3.4 Building Construction - 2016 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Date: 12/8/2016 9:12 AM Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day Ib/day Hauling Vendor Worker • • • • 0.0000 w 0.1041 0.3639 0.0000 -, r 2.8133 r 0.2606 0.0000 0.6883 2.6056 , 0.0000 r5.1200e- 003 5.6000e- 003 0.0000 r ., 0.1281 0.5589 0.0000 0.0334 3.7200e- 003 0.0000 r -, 0.1615 0.5626 , 0.0000 0.0369 0.1482 0.0000 r 0.0320 3.4300e- , 003 0.0000 i a a r .. 0.0689 1 a t T 0.1517 1 a a 0.0000 538.1460 556.4130 0.0000 _ 538.1460 556.4130 0.0000 r 0.0592 r 0.0202 • 0.0000 T 539.6266 T 556.9181 Total Total 0.4680 3.0738 3.2938 0.0107 0.6870 0.0372 0.7241 0.1851 0.0354 0.2205 0.0000 1,094.559 0 1,094.559 0 0.0794 1,096.544 7 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road • 2.4162 26.1621 15.4081 0.0253 1.5137 1.5137 1.3926 1.3926 1 0.0000 2,630.378 2,630.378 0.7934 2,650.214 a 6 , 6 , , 0 a Total 2.4162 26.1621 15.4081 0.0253 1.5137 1.5137 1.3926 1.3926 0.0000 2,630.378 2,630.378 0.7934 2,650.214 6 6 0 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 14 of 23 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Winter 3.4 Building Construction - 2016 Mitigated Construction Off -Site Date: 12/8/2016 9:12 AM 3.5 Paving - 2016 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day Ib/day Hauling Vendor Worker • . • w • 0.0000 , 0.1041 0.3639 0.0000 -, 2.8133 , r 0.2606 0.0000 , 0.6883 2.6056 0.0000 5.1200e- , 003 5.6000e- , 003 0.0000 rr 0.1281 r 0.5589 , • 0.0000 • 0.0334 • 3.7200e- ' 003 • 0.0000 r 0.1615 r 0.5626 0.0000 0.0369 0.1482 0.0000 r 0.0320 3.4300e- 003 • 0.0000 ± i i r y 0.0689 i y i y T 0.1517 + i i 0.0000 538.1460 556.4130 0.0000 538.1460 556.4130 0.0000 r 0.0592 r 0.0202 T T 0.0000 539.6266 556.9181 Total 2.6825 0.4680 3.0738 3.2938 0.0107 0.6870 0.0372 0.7241 0.1851 0.0354 0.2205 2,360.565 1,094.559 0 1,094.559 0 0.0794 2,378.366 1,096.544 7 3.5 Paving - 2016 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CI -14 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road 1.9594 i 22.2283 i 13.2680 i 0.0227 1.2040 1.2040 1.1077 1.1077 i 2,360.565 2,360.565 0.7120 2,378.366 3 3 0 1 i Paving • n w 0.7231 , ' , 0.0000 -. 0.0000 , 0.0000 r i 0.0000 1 i- 0.0000 r r 0.0000 Total 2.6825 22.2283 13.2680 0.0227 1.2040 1.2040 1.1077 1.1077 2,360.565 2,360.565 0.7120 2,378.366 3 3 0 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 15 of 23 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Winter 3.5 Paving - 2016 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Date: 12/8/2016 9:12 AM Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i : T Vendor • 00000. r 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 r 0.0000 0.0000 T 0.0000 1 0.0000: 0.0000 r 0.0000 0.0000 J Worker • 0.0946 r 0.0677 0.6774 ,-- ,-- r 0.1453 9.7000e- r 0.1463 r 0.0385 8.9000e- T 0.0394 1 144.6674 144.6674 r5.2500e- T 144.7987 003 004 004 i 003 , • Total 2.6825 22.2283 l 0.0227 1.2040 1.2040 Total 1.1077 0.0946 0.0677 0.6774 1.4600e- 0.1453 9.7000e- 0.1463 0.0385 8.9000e- 0.0394 144.6674 144.6674 5.2500e- 144.7987 3 3 003 004 004 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road 1.9594 22.2283 13.2680 0.0227 1.2040 1.2040 1.1077 1.1077 10.0000 2,360.565 2,360.565 0.7120 2,378.366 3 3 0 • r - T Paving • 0.7231 r r r 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 T 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 i Total 2.6825 22.2283 13.2680 0.0227 1.2040 1.2040 1.1077 1.1077 0.0000 2,360.565 2,360.565 0.7120 2,378.366 3 3 0 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 16 of 23 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Winter 3.5 Paving - 2016 Mitigated Construction Off -Site Date: 12/8/2016 9:12 AM 3.5 Paving - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road Paving A 1.8358 w 0.7231 20.5337 w Hauling • 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 . 0.0000 0.0000 ± 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 A 1.1148 r ' 0.0000 • r r w -, , -, , -, r y 7 T r Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2,326.400 9 0.0000 t r 4 Worker 4x144.6674 • 0.0946 0.0677 0.6774 r1.4600e- r 0.1453 r9.7000e- r 0.1463 r 0.0385 8.9000e- r 0.0394 t 144.6674 r5.2500e- t 144.7987 2.5589 , 003 , 004 , , 004 j 003 , 0.0228 1.1148 1.1148 1.0257 1.0257 2,326.400 9 2,326.400 9 0.7128 t 2,344.221 1 Total 0.0946 0.0677 0.6774 1.4600e- 0.1453 9.7000e- 0.1463 0.0385 8.9000e- 0.0394 144.6674 144.6674 5.2500e- 144.7987 003 004 004 003 3.5 Paving - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day 1 Ib/day Off -Road Paving • • • • 1.8358 w 0.7231 20.5337 w 13.1558 r -,r 0.0228 1.1148 0.0000 1.1148 r ' 0.0000 1.0257 w 0.0000 1.0257 1 t t r * 0.0000 1 t t 2,326.400 9 4 2,326.400 9 0.0000 0.7128 w r 4 2,344.221 , 1 0.0000 Total 2.5589 20.5337 13.1558 0.0228 1.1148 1.1148 1.0257 1.0257 2,326.400 9 2,326.400 9 0.7128 2,344.221 1 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 17 of 23 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Winter 3.5 Paving - 2017 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Date: 12/8/2016 9:12 AM Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling Vendor Worker • • • • 0.0000 0.0000 0.0848 0.0000 r -, 0.0000 0.0591 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.5951 0.0000 0.0000 1.4200e- , 003 0.0000 r -. 0.0000 r 0.1453 0.0000 0.0000 9.3000e- 004 0.0000 r 0.0000 0.1462 0.0000 r 0.0000 0.0385 0.0000 r 0.0000 8.6000e- 004 0.0000 1 i i T y 0.0000 1 i i T 0.0394 i i i 0.0000 7 0.0000 140.8733 0.0000 0.0000 140.8733 0.0000 r 0.0000 r4.6100e- , 003 r T , 0.0000 0.0000 T 140.9886 Total 0.0848 0.0591 0.5951 1.4200e- 003 0.1453 9.3000e- 004 0.1462 0.0385 8.6000e- 004 0.0394 0.0000 140.8733 140.8733 4.6100e- 003 140.9886 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road Paving • •, • • A 1.8358 0.7231 . 20.5337 .• 13.1558 T 0.0228 r . r 7 i 1.1148 0.0000 1.1148 r 0.0000 r 7 1.0257 0.0000 1.0257 i 0.0000 A i T y 0.0000 i i i 2,326.400 • 9 . , 2,326.400 , 9 r 0.0000 • 0.7128 1 r , 2,344.221 1 0.0000 Total 2.5589 20.5337 13.1558 0.0228 1.1148 1.1148 1.0257 1.0257 0.0000 2,326.400 9 2,326.400 9 0.7128 2,344.221 1 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 18 of 23 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Winter 3.5 Paving - 2017 Mitigated Construction Off -Site Date: 12/8/2016 9:12 AM 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day - Ib/day Hauling Vendor Worker :: • n • 0.0000 0.0000 -.r 0.0848 0.0000 r -. 0.0000 0.0591 0.0000 0.0000 0.5951 0.0000 r 0.0000 1.4200e- 003 0.0000 r , 0.0000 r 0.1453 0.0000 1 0.0000 r 9.3000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 r-. 0.1462 0.0000 r 0.0000 0.0385 0.0000 r 0.0000 r8.6000e- 004 0.0000 i J i r 4 0.0000 1 J i r 0.0394 1 j i 0.0000 r 7 0.0000 140.8733 0.0000 0.0000 140.8733 0.0000 r 0.0000 r4.6100e- 003 r t r T , 0.0000 0.0000 140.9886 Total 0.0848 0.0591 0.5951 1.4200e- 003 0.1453 9.3000e- 004 0.1462 0.0385 8.6000e- 004 0.0394 140.8733 140.8733 4.6100e- 003 140.9886 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 19 of 23 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Winter Date: 12/8/2016 9:12 AM 4.2 Trip Summary Information ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 ' PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 Co2e Category Ib/day - Ib/day Mitigated • 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 • 0.0000 i 0.0000 ; 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 M Unmitigated •. 0.0000 T 0.0000 T 0.0000 T 0.0000 . 0.0000 T 0.0000 T 0.0000 • 0.0000 T 0.0000 T 0.0000 ; 0.0000 ; 0.0000 . 0.0000 1 ; 0.0000 • , 0.0000 T 0.0000 T 0.0000 T . 0.0000 4.2 Trip Summary Information 4.3 Trip Type Information Ave age Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Trip % Mitigated Land Use Trip Purpose % Weekday Saturday Sunday H -S or C -C Annual VMT H -W or C -W Annual VMT Other Asphalt Surfaces•0.00 Primary 0.00 0.00 •• , 8.40 Total 0.00 I 0.00 0.00 0.00 I I 4.3 Trip Type Information 4.4 Fleet Mix Land Use I LDA I LDT1 I LDT2 I MDV I LHD1 I LHD2 I MHD I HHD I OBUS I UBUS I MCY I SBUS I MH Other Asphalt Surfaces : 0.527920• 0.040740: 0.182967 • 0.130733 • 0.020108: 0.005812: 0.016781: 0.065303: 0.001324: 0.001284: 0.004728: 0.000989: 0.001311 5.0 Energy Detail Historical Energy Use: N Miles Trip % Trip Purpose % Land Use H -W or C -W H -S or C -C H -O or C -NW H -W or C -W H -S or C -C H -O or C -NW Primary I Diverted Pass -by Other Asphalt Surfaces 16.60 , 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 : 0 0 0 4.4 Fleet Mix Land Use I LDA I LDT1 I LDT2 I MDV I LHD1 I LHD2 I MHD I HHD I OBUS I UBUS I MCY I SBUS I MH Other Asphalt Surfaces : 0.527920• 0.040740: 0.182967 • 0.130733 • 0.020108: 0.005812: 0.016781: 0.065303: 0.001324: 0.001284: 0.004728: 0.000989: 0.001311 5.0 Energy Detail Historical Energy Use: N CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2O16.3.1 Page 20 of 23 Date: 12/8/2016 9:12 AM Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Winter 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day NaturalGas . 0.0000 . 0.0000 i 0.0000 • 0.0000 i • 0.0000 • 0.0000 . . 0.0000 i 0.0000 � • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 . 0.0000 • 0.0000 Mitigated, ; ; a ; ; ; • T T NaturalGas . 0.0000 T 0.0000 T 0.0000 T 0.0000 T T 0.0000 T 0.0000 T , 0.0000 T 0.0000 • r 0.0000 T 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 , 0.0000 Unmitigated 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr Ib/day Ib/day Other Asphalt Surfaces 0 : a a 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i a 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 21 of 23 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Winter 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Mitigated Date: 12/8/2016 9:12 AM 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr Ib/day Ib/day Other Asphalt Surfaces . 0 + a, a. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 a a 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day Mitigated 0.0529 1.2000e- 0.0124 0.0000 . 4.0000e- . 4.0000e- . . 4.0000e- . 4.0000e- a . 0.0263 . 0.0263 . 7.0000e- . ! 0.0281 004 005 005 005 : 005 + 005 a T T •T Unmitigated .. 0.0529 T 1.2000e- T 0.0124 T 0.0000 T T 4.0000e- • 4.0000e- T T 4.0000e- • 4.0000e- • . 0.0263 T 0.0263 T 7.0000e- T • 0.0281 004 005 005 005 005 005 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 22 of 23 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Winter 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated Date: 12/8/2016 9:12 AM Mitigated ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e SubCategory Ib/day Ib/day Architectural • 9.1500e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 Coating 003 y M r r - - 7 r , r r t r 7 7 r Consumer • 0.0426 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 Products A A r1.2000e- r Landscaping • 1.1900e- 0.0124 r 0.0000 r 4.0000e- r4.0000e- 4.0000e- r 4.0000e- + 0.0263 0.0263 4 -Ir7.0000e- r T 0.0281 003 004 005 005005 005 ± 005 , . A r r r 1 7 y r Landscaping • r r r 1.1900e- 1.2000e- 0.0124 0.0000 4.0000e- 4.0000e- 4.0000e- 4.0000e- + 0.0263 0.0263 7.0000e- 0.0281 003 , 004 , 005 005 , 005 005 j , 005 . y y Total 0.0529 1.2000e- 0.0124 0.0000 0.0529 4.0000e- 4.0000e- 0.0000 4.0000e- 4.0000e- 4.0000e- 0.0263 0.0263 7.0000e- 0.0281 0.0263 7.0000e- 004 0.0281 005 005 005 005 005 005 005 Mitigated 7.0 Water Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e SubCategory Ib/day Ib/day Architectural • 9.1500e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 Coating 003 + a • w r r r r r r r 4 r r r t Consumer • 0.0426 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 Products A A r r r 1 7 y r Landscaping • r r r 1.1900e- 1.2000e- 0.0124 0.0000 4.0000e- 4.0000e- 4.0000e- 4.0000e- + 0.0263 0.0263 7.0000e- 0.0281 003 , 004 , 005 005 , 005 005 j , 005 . y , Total 0.0529 1.2000e- 0.0124 0.0000 4.0000e- 4.0000e- 4.0000e- 4.0000e- 0.0263 0.0263 7.0000e- 0.0281 004 005 005 005 005 005 7.0 Water Detail CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 23 of 23 Date: 12/8/2016 9:12 AM Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Winter 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type INumber 1 Hours/Day I Days/Year 1 Horse Power I Load Factor I Fuel Type 10.0 Stationary Equipment Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators Equipment Type INumber 1 Hours/Day I Hours/Year 1 Horse Power I Load Factor I Fuel Type Boilers Equipment Type 1 Number I Heat Input/Day I Heat Input/Year I Boiler Rating I Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type INumber 11.0 Vegetation City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening Appendix B: Habitat Assessment/MSHCP Consistency Analysis December 2016 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Michael Baker INTERNATIONAL December 2, 2016 CITY OF TEMECULA Contact: William Becerra 41000 Main Street Temecula, California 92590 Innovation Done Right...We Make a Difference SUBJECT: Habitat Assessment and Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) Consistency Analysis for the Pechanga Parkway Widening Project Introduction Michael Baker International (Michael Baker) conducted a habitat assessment for the Pechanga Parkway Widening Project located in the City of Temecula, Riverside County, California (project site or site). Michael Baker biologist Travis J. McGill inventoried and evaluated the condition of the habitat within the proposed project footprint on November 14, 2016. The site investigation was conducted to characterize existing site conditions and to assess the probability of occurrence of special -status' plant and wildlife species that could pose a constraint to implementation of the proposed project. Special attention was given to the suitability of the habitat on-site to support burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia) and other sensitive species identified by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife's (CDFW) California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB), Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP), and other electronic databases as sensitive and as potentially occurring in the vicinity of the project site. Proiect Location and Setting The proposed Pechanga Parkway Widening Project (proposed project) located in the City of Temecula within southwestern Riverside County, California (refer to Exhibit 1, Regional Vicinity Map). The proposed project site is depicted on the Pechanga quadrangle of the United States Geological Survey's (USGS) 7.5 - minute topographic map series in an unsectiond portion of Township 8 south, Range 2 west. Specifically, the project is located along, and adjacent to, the existing Pechanga Parkway alignment from Via Gilberto to North Casino Drive (refer to Exhibit 2, Local Vicinity Map). The objective of the proposed project is to widen Pechanga Parkway from a four lane (110 feet width) facility to six lanes (134 feet width) generally between Via Gilberto and North Casino Drive in order to accommodate existing and predicted traffic demands and uphold the City of Temecula's goals to reduce 1 As used in this report, "special -status" refers to plant and wildlife species that are federally or State listed, proposed, or candidates; plant species that have been designated a California Native Plant Society (CNPS) Rare Plant Rank; listed under the MSHCP; and wildlife species that are designated by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) as fully protected, species of special concern, or watch list species. MBAKERINTL.COM 40810 Country Center Drive, Suite 2001 Temecula, CA 92591 Office 951.676-80421 Fax: 951-6767240 December 2, 2016 Page 2 of 10 traffic congestion, improve safety on roadways, and provide better access to regional transportation routes. Due to the expansion of the Pechanga Resort & Casino and continued residential development along Pechanga Parkway, additional roadway capacity to meet existing and future needs was identified. The project site, which includes an approximately 3,500 foot segment of the existing roadway, consists of improved road right-of-way (ROW), as well as pedestrian facilities and an existing flood control channel. There are a number of overhead and underground utilities which serve the surrounding area that are located within the existing road right of way. These utilities include a fiber optics cable, electrical, gas, storm drain, sewer, recycled and domestic water. A number of the existing aboveground utility appurtenances (street lighting and signals) will need to be relocated during the construction process. Additionally, the flood control facilities that run parallel to Pechanga Parkway will require modification to accommodate the widened roadway. According to the City of Temecula General Plan, the parcels adjacent to the project site include Low Medium Density Residential (LM) and Specific Plan (SP) to the north, Tribal Trust Lands (TTL) and SP to the south, LM and TTL to the west, and SP to the East. According to the City of Temecula General Plan Land Use Map, the parcels adjacent to the project site are designated as LM to the north, LM and TTL to the south, LM and TTL to the west, and LM, Medium Density Residential (MD), Neighborhood Commercial (NC), and Community Commercial (CC) to the east. Project Background Incorporated in 1989, the City of Temecula ("City") celebrated its 25th anniversary of incorporation on December 1, 2014. The City is located in southwestern Riverside County and is known as one of the fastest growing cities in California. Currently, the City is home to over 106,000 residents and spans over 37.18 square miles. According to the City of Temecula General Plan, the city was planned in a manner that would preserve and enhance high quality living while preserving the topography of the surrounding area. Temecula is known as the heart of Southern California wine country due to the expansive viticulture -related land uses in the eastern regions of the city. Pechanga Parkway functions as a primary north -south arterial for the southern portion of the City of Temecula circulation network. In response to high traffic volumes, the proposed project would continue the 2009 Pechanga Parkway Phase II Improvements that widened Pechanga Parkway to a six -lane facility from State Route 79 South (Temecula Parkway) to Via Gilberto and a four -lane facility from Via Gilberto to Wolf Valley Road. Proiect Characteristics The project proposes the widening of Pechanga Parkway from a four lane (110 feet width) facility to six lanes (134 feet width). The roadway widening would occur along a segment of the existing roadway, spanning approximately 3,600 feet. The improvements would extend from approximately 320 feet north of Via Gilberto to approximately 320 feet south of North Casino Drive (refer to Exhibits 3a — 3d, Site Plan). As the roadway exists, it includes four travel lanes in each direction, a landscaped center median, and left hand turn lanes for access to Via Eduardo/Wolf Valley Road, Casino Drive, and Pechanga Resort Drive. The existing roadway also included sidewalk throughout the project area, as well as bike lanes in both Pechanga Parkway Widening Project Habitat Assessment and MSHCP Consistency Analysis Michael Baker INTERNATIONAL December 2, 2016 Page 3 of 10 directions, with the exception of on the southbound roadway along the frontage of the Pechanga Resort and Casino. The proposed widening would include the following modifications to the roadway: • Construction to accommodate the addition of new travel lanes; • Construction of two (2) additional travel lanes; • Addition of new center median curb and landscaping; • Installation of a fiber optics cable; • Re -locating streetlights and traffic signals. The proposed roadway widening would expand the Pechanga Parkway Phase II improvements that occurred in 2009 which widened Pechanga Parkway to a six -lane facility from State Route 79 South (Temecula Parkway) to Via Gilberto and a four -lane facility from Via Gilberto to Wolf Valley Road. The roadway widening aims at to expand the existing improvements to alleviate traffic along Pechanga Parkway and further the long-term transportation needs identified by the City of Temecula General Plan. Besides the widening of Pechanga Parkway from four lanes to six lanes, the project also includes curb, gutter, sound wall, sidewalk, landscaping, irrigation, and storm drain improvements. Project construction would occur over six months beginning in spring. Construction activities would include site mobilization, demolition, minor grading, installation activities, and repaving activities (repaving, striping). Methodology A literature review and records search was conducted to determine which sensitive biological resources have the potential to occur on or within the general vicinity of the project site. In addition to the literature review, a general habitat assessment or site investigation of the project site was conducted. The field survey provided information on the existing conditions on the site and its potential to support sensitive biological resources. Literature Review Prior to conducting a field visit, a literature review and records search was conducted for sensitive biological resources potentially occurring on or within the general vicinity of the project site. Previously recorded occurrences of special -status plant and wildlife species and their proximity, specifically within 2 miles, to the project site were determined through a query of the CDFWs CNDDB Rarefind 5 software, the California Native Plant Society's (CNPS) Electronic Inventory of Rare, Threatened, and Endangered Plants of California, Calflora Database, compendia of special -status species published by the CDFW, and United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) species listings. The Riverside County Integrated Project (RCIP) Conservation Summary Report Generator was queried to determine if the MSHCP identifies any potential survey requirements for the project site (refer to Attachment B). Additionally, the proposed project site was reviewed against the MSHCP to determine if the site is located within any MSHCP areas including Criteria Cells (core habitat and wildlife movement corridors) and areas proposed for conservation. Pechanga Parkway Widening Project Habitat Assessment and MSHCP Consistency Analysis Michael Baker INTERNATIONAL December 2, 2016 Page 4 of 10 Field Investigation Following the literature review, biologists Travis J. McGill inventoried and evaluated the extent and conditions of the plant communities found within the boundaries of the proposed project tank on November 14, 2016. In addition, Mr. McGill identified any jurisdictional features, riparian/riverine habitat, as well as natural corridors and linkages that may support the movement of wildlife through the area. Special attention was given to any sensitive habitats and/or undeveloped areas, which have higher potentials to support sensitive flora and fauna species. Areas having the potential to provide suitable habitat for burrowing owl were closely surveyed for signs of presence during the habitat assessment. All plant and wildlife species observed, as well as dominant plant species within each plant community, were recorded. Wildlife detections were made through observation of scat, trails, tracks, burrows, nests, and/or visual and aural observation. In addition, site characteristics such as soil condition, topography, hydrology, anthropogenic disturbances, indicator species, condition of on-site plant communities, and presence of potential jurisdictional drainage and/or wetland features as well as riparian/riverine areas were noted. Plant communities identified on aerial photographs during the literature review were verified by walking meandering transects through the project site. The plant communities were evaluated for their potential to support sensitive plant and wildlife species. All plant and wildlife species observed, as well as dominant plant species, were recorded in a standardized field notebook. In addition, site characteristics such as soil condition, topography, presence of indicator species, slope, conditions of the plant communities, hydrology, jurisdictional features, and evidence of human use of the site were noted. Existing Site Condition The project site is relatively flat with no areas of significant topographic relief. The on-site elevation ranges from approximately 1,050 to 1,100 feet above mean sea level. According to the USDA Soil Survey, on-site soils consist of Greenfiled sandy loam (0 to 2 percent slopes), Gorgonio loamy sand (0 to 8 percent slopes), Ramona and Buren sandy loams (15 to 25 percent slopes, severely eroded), and Hanford fine sandy loam (0 to 2 percent slopes). The project site occurs in an area that has primarily been converted from natural habitats into residential and commercial land uses. Residential homes and the Pechanga Resort and Casino boarder the project site to the south, and residential homes and vacant fields border the project site to the north. The proposed widening alignment is surrounded by existing development which has removed natural plant communities from the surrounding area. The proposed project will be confined to existing paved streets, and landscaped areas. Vegetation On-site and surrounding land uses have eliminated the naturally occurring habitats around the project footprint, reducing the suitability of the habitat to support sensitive plant and wildlife species. As a result of existing development, undisturbed native plant communities are no longer present within the boundaries of the project site. Pechanga Parkway Widening Project Habitat Assessment and MSHCP Consistency Analysis Michael Baker INTERNATIONAL December 2, 2016 Page 5 of 10 The proposed widening alignment will be installed within the existing paved roads and landscaped areas. No plant natural communities will be affected from installation of the proposed pipeline alignments. Wildlife The project site provides limited habitat for wildlife species adapted to a high degree of human presence and development. The majority of the wildlife observed during the habitat assessment consisted of avian species. Six (6) avian species were detected which included house finch (Haemorhous mexicanus), black phoebe (Sayornis nigricans), mourning dove (Zenaida macroura), European starling (Sturnus vulgaris), rock pigeon (Columba livia), and Anna's hummingbird (Calypte anna). No mammals were detected during the habitat assessment. However, mammalian species expected to occur on the project site are those adapted to continual human presence and development (e.g. California ground squirrel (Otospermophilus beecheyi), opossum (Didelphis virginiana) and deer mouse (Peromyscus sp.)). The project site provides limited habitat for reptilian species acclimated to human presence and disturbance. No reptiles were detected during the habitat assessment, however, reptilian species expected to occur include western fence lizard (Sceloporus occidentalis), alligator lizard (Elgaria coerulea), and side - blotched lizard (Uta stansburiana). No fish or amphibians were observed on the project site during the habitat assessment. No hydrogeomorphic features (e.g. creeks, ponds, lakes, reservoirs) that would provide suitable habitat for fish or amphibian populations were observed on the project site. Therefore, no fish or amphibian species are expected to occur on-site and are presumed absent. Nestin>s Birds The ornamental plant communities adjacent to the proposed widening alignmens have the potential to provide suitable nesting, foraging, and cover habitat for year-round and seasonal avian residents, and migrating songbirds that could occur in the area. No nesting birds or breeding behaviors were observed during the field survey. Mi ratory Corridors and Linkages Habitat linkages provide connections between larger habitat areas that are separated by development. Wildlife corridors are similar to linkages, but provide specific opportunities for animals to disperse or migrate between areas. A corridor can be defined as a linear landscape feature of sufficient width to allow animal movement between two comparatively undisturbed habitat fragments. Adequate cover is essential for a corridor to function as a wildlife movement area. It is possible for a habitat corridor to be adequate for one species yet still inadequate for others. Wildlife corridors are features that allow for the dispersal, seasonal migration, breeding, and foraging of a variety of wildlife species. Additionally, open space can provide a buffer against both human disturbance and natural fluctuations in resources. The proposed widening alignment is surrounded by existing development which has removed natural plant communities from the surrounding area. The proposed project will be confined to existing paved streets and landscaped areas. As a result, the proposed project will not disrupt or have any adverse effects on any Pechanga Parkway Widening Project Habitat Assessment and MSHCP Consistency Analysis Michael Baker INTERNATIONAL December 2, 2016 Page 6 of 10 migratory corridors or linkages in the surrounding area. Additionally, the project site is not located within any MSHCP identified corridor or linkage. Jurisdictional Areas There are three key agencies that regulate activities within inland streams, wetlands, and riparian areas in California. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) Regulatory Branch regulates discharge of dredge or fill materials into "waters of the United States" pursuant to Section 404 of the Federal Clean Water Act (CWA) and Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act. Of the State agencies, the CDFW regulates alterations to streambed and bank under Fish and Wildlife Code Sections 1600 et seq., and the Regional Water Quality Control Board (Regional Board) regulates discharges into surface waters pursuant to Section 401 of the CWA and the California Porter -Cologne Water Quality Control Act. No jurisdictional drainage features or isolated wetland features that would qualify as "waters of the United States" or "waters of the state" are located within the proposed project footprint. It should be noted that Wolf Valley Creek Channel is located immediately north of the proposed project footprint. Wolf Valley Creek Channel receives flows from urban runoff and direct precipitation. Water in this channel flows from southeast to northwest, north of the project site, and eventually flows into Temecula Creek. Wolf Creek Valley Channel is primarily earthen -lined throughout most of its reach, with concrete and riprap armoring at the various road bridge crossings. The slopes of Wolf Valley Creek Channel are artificially maintained, and planted with ornamental grass. The active channel (low flow channel) of Wolf Valley Creek supports cattails (Typha sp.), and California bulrush (Schoenoplectus californicus). Although artificially created, Wolf Valley Creek Channel will likely be considered jurisdictional by the Corps, Regional Board, and CDFW. Based on current design plans, the proposed widening alignment not is anticipated to impact Wolf Valley Creek Channel. However, if during final design impacts to Wolf Valley Creek Channel will occur, the City of Temecula will need to have formal jurisdictional delineation prepared delineate the limits of jurisdiction and calculate the anticipated impacts from the proposed project. Any impacts to Wolf Valley Creek Channel, will likely required a CWA Section 404 permit from the Corps, CWA Section 401 Water Quality Certification from the Regional Board, and a Section 1602 Streambed Alteration Agreement from CDFW. Sensitive Biological Resources The CNDDB and CNPS was queried for reported locations of sensitive plant and wildlife species as well as sensitive natural plant communities within 2 miles of the project site within the Pechanga and Temecula USGS 7.5 -minute quadrangles. Only a 2 mile buffer around the project site was queried due to the project site's isolation from undisturbed native habitat and development surrounding the project site. A search of published records of these species was conducted within 2 miles of the project site using the CDFW CNDDB Rarefind 5 online software and CNPS Electronic Inventory. This report evaluated the conditions of the habitat(s) within the boundaries of the project site to determine if the existing plant communities have the potential to provide suitable habitat(s) for special -status plant and wildlife species. The literature search identified nine (9) special -status plant species, fourteen (14) special -status wildlife species, and one (1) special -status natural plant community as being documented within 2 miles of the Pechanga Parkway Widening Project Habitat Assessment and MSHCP Consistency Analysis Michael Baker INTERNATIONAL December 2, 2016 Page 7 of 10 project site. These special -status plant and wildlife species were evaluated for their potential to occur on the project site based on habitat requirements, availability/quality of suitable habitat, and known distributions. Special -status species that have been documented within 2 miles of the project site are presented in Attachment D, Potentially Occurring Status Species Biological Resources. Based on habitat requirements for specific species and the availability and quality of on-site habitats, it was determined that the project site does not provide suitable habitat that would support any of the CNDDB, CNPS or MSHCP listed plant or wildlife species that have been documented within 2 miles of the project site. The proposed widening alignment will be installed within the existing paved roads and landscaped areas. Further, the area surrounding the proposed project site is developed, which has removed natural plant communities that once occurred in the general area. Critical Habitat Under the federal Endangered Species Act, "Critical Habitat" is designated at the time of listing of a species or within one year of listing. Critical Habitat refers to habitat or a specific geographic area that contains the elements and features that are essential for the survival and recovery of the species. Maintenance of these physical and biological features requires special management considerations or protection, regardless of whether individuals or the species are present or not. In the event that a project may result in take or adverse modification to a species' designated Critical Habitat, a project proponent may be required to engage in suitable mitigation. However, consultation for impacts to Critical Habitat is only required when a project has a federal nexus (i.e. occurs on federal land, is issued federal permits [e.g. Corps Section 404 permit, or Corps Section 408 permit], or receives any other federal oversight or funding). If a project does not have a federal nexus, Critical Habitat consultations are not required. The USFWS Critical Habitat mapper was used to locate the closest federally designated Critical Habitat to the project site. The USFWS Critical Habitat mapper shows that the project site is not located within federally designated Critical Habitat. The closest designated Critical Habitat is located approximately 2 miles east of the project site for coastal California gnatcatcher (Polioptila californica californica). Western Riverside County MSHCP The project site is located in the Southwest Area Plan if the MSHCP, but is not located within any criteria cells, conservations areas, cores, or linkages identified within the MSHCP. Riparian/Riverine Areas Under MSHCP Section 6.1.2, riparian/riverine areas are defined as areas dominated by trees, shrubs, persistent emergent plants, or emergent mosses and lichens which occur close to or are dependent upon nearby freshwater, or areas with freshwater flowing during all or a portion of the year. Conservation of these areas is intended to protect habitat that is essential to a number of listed, water -dependent amphibians, birds, fish, invertebrates, and plants. If all impacts to riparian/riverine habitat cannot be avoided, a mitigation strategy called a Determination of Biologically Equivalent or Superior Preservation (DBESP) must be developed that addresses the replacement of lost functions of habitats in regards to the listed species. This assessment is independent from considerations given to "waters of the U.S." and "waters of the State" under the CWA and the California Fish and Game Code. Pechanga Parkway Widening Project Habitat Assessment and MSHCP Consistency Analysis Michael Baker INTERNATIONAL December 2, 2016 Page 8 of 10 No jurisdictional riparian/riverine areas are located within the proposed project footprint. It should be noted that Wolf Valley Creek Channel is located immediately north of the proposed project footprint. Wolf Valley Creek Channel is artificially maintained, and is planted with ornamental grass. Although artificially created, Wolf Valley Creek Channel will likely be considered riparian/riverine habitat under the MSHCP. Pursuant to Section 6.1.2 of the MSHCP, any alteration or loss of riparian/riverine habitat that may occur as a result of the proposed project will require the preparation of a Determination of Biologically Equivalent or Superior Preservation (DBESP) to ensure the replacement of any lost functions and values associated with Wolf Valley Creek Channel. Based on current design plans, no impacts to Wolf Valley Creek Channel are expected to occur from development of the proposed project. Vernal Pools The MSHCP lists two general classes of soils known to be associated with special -status plant species; clay soils and Traver -Domino Willow association soils. The specific clay soils known to be associated with special -status species within the MSHCP plan area include Bosanko, Auld, Altamont, and Porterville series soils, whereas Traver -Domino Willows association includes saline -alkali soils largely located along floodplain areas of the San Jacinto River and Salt Creek. Without the appropriate soils to create the impermeable restrictive layer, none of the special -status species associated with vernal pools can occur on the project site. None of these soils occur on the project site. Since the proposed widening alignment will be installed within the existing paved roads and landscaped areas, no undisturbed soils will be impacted. No impacts to vernal pools or fairy shrimp habitat will occur from implementation of the proposed project. Narrow Endemic Plant Species Based on the RCIP query and review of the MSHCP, it was determined that the proposed project is not located within the designated survey area for Narrow Endemic Plant Species as depicted in Figure 6-1 within Section 6.1.3 of the MSHCP. The proposed widening alignment will be installed within existing paved roads and landscaped areas that do not provide suitable habitat for Narrow Endemic Plant Species. Urban/Wildlands Interface Guidelines According to the MSHCP, the Urban/Wildlands Interface Guidelines are intended to address indirect effects associated with new development in proximity to MSHCP Conservation Areas (MSHCP, p 6-42). The proposed project is not located in or immediately adjacent to any Criteria Cells or MSHCP Conservation Areas; therefore, indirect project -related impacts to drainage, toxics, lighting, noise, invasive plant species, barriers, and grading/land development will not occur. Additional Survey Needs and Procedures The RCIP Conservation Summary Report Generator was queried to determine if the MSHCP lists any survey requirements for the project. The summary report identified that the project site is located in the designated survey area for burrowing owl as depicted in Figure 6-4 within Sections 6.3.2 of the MSHCP. Since the proposed widening alignment will be installed within the existing paved road and landscaped areas, burrowing owl are presumed absent and no impacts to burrowing owl will occur. Despite a systematic search of potentially suitable burrows and open habitat throughout the project site, no burrowing owl or sign (pellets, feathers, castings, or white wash) was observed during the habitat Pechanga Parkway Widening Project Habitat Assessment and MSHCP Consistency Analysis Michael Baker INTERNATIONAL December 2, 2016 Page 9 of 10 assessment. The heavy disturbances associated with the disking activities have likely precluded burrowing owls from inhabiting the project site. Due to the lack of burrowing owl sign and suitable burrows, burrowing owl are presumed not to occupy the project site and have a low potential to occur on site. A burrowing owl pre -construction clearance survey is recommended to be conducted within seven (7) days prior to ground disturbance, in accordance with the MSHCP, to ensure burrowing owl remain absent from the project site. Conclusion No sensitive plant or wildlife species were observed on the project site during the habitat assessment. It was found that naturally occurring native plant communities are not present on-site and the proposed project site has limited potential or support sensitive plant and wildlife species known to occur in the general area. Surrounding development has isolated the project site from connecting to undisturbed, natural habitats still available in the area. The isolation and disturbance level of the project site limits the site's viability to provide suitable habitat for sensitive biological resources (i.e. sensitive plant and wildlife species, drainage features). As a result, the site does not provide suitable habitat for any of the identified sensitive plant or wildlife species known to occur in the general area, and no significant adverse impacts to biological resources are identified or anticipated, during the implementation of the proposed project. Therefore, we have determined that this project will not have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modification on any special -status species known to occur in the general vicinity of the project site. Recommendations Migratory Bird Treaty Act Pursuant to the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and Fish and Game Code, removal of any trees, shrubs, or any other potential nesting habitat should be conducted outside the avian nesting season. The nesting season generally extends from early February through August, but can vary slightly from year to year based upon seasonal weather conditions. If ground disturbance and vegetation removal cannot occur outside of the nesting season, a pre -construction clearance survey for nesting birds should be conducted within seven (7) days of the start of any ground disturbing activities to ensure that no nesting birds will be disturbed during construction. The biologist conducting the clearance survey should document a negative survey with a brief letter report indicating that no impacts to active avian nests will occur. If an active avian nest is discovered during the pre -construction clearance survey, construction activities should stay outside of a 300 -foot buffer around the active nest. For raptor species, this buffer is expanded to 500 feet. It is recommended that a biological monitor be present to delineate the boundaries of the buffer area and to monitor the active nest to ensure that nesting behavior is not adversely affected by the construction activity. Once the young have fledged and left the nest, or the nest otherwise becomes inactive under natural conditions, normal construction activities can occur. Please do not hesitate to contact Thomas J. McGill at (909) 974-4907 or tmcgill(ambakerintl.com or Travis J. McGill at (909) 974-4958 or travismcgill(a,mbakerintl.com should you have any questions or require further information. Pechanga Parkway Widening Project Habitat Assessment and MSHCP Consistency Analysis Michael Baker INTERNATIONAL December 2, 2016 Page l0 of 10 Sincerely, Thomas J. McGill, Ph.D. Travis J. McGill Vice President Biologist Natural Resources Natural Resources Attachments: A. Project Exhibits B. Riverside County Integrated Project Conservation Summary Report C. Site Photographs D. Potentially Occurring Special -Status Biological Resources Pechanga Parkway Widening Project Habitat Assessment and MSHCP Consistency Analysis Michael Baker INTERNATIONAL Attachment A Project Exhibits 10/10/2016 JN M. 1Mdata1153547\GIS\MXD\Ex 1 Regio Perris. _ake Elsinore land ge ,SedcoHills Wildomat" Murrieta" MAVAL WEAPON STATIONSEAL HEA'. CCETACNMENTCAtLP- Fallbrook. tt' Nuevo GA Sun City r . i Mu rrieta Hot Springs Temecula' AYi! AN 4!J!iN;A!N Legend 0 Project Site 1\1 gri Project Site PAUMA nil MA 'ALA Content may not reflect National Geographic's current; map policy. Sources: National Geographic, Esri, DeLorme, HERE, UNEP-WCMC, USGS,,NASA, ESA, METI, NRCAN, GEBCO, NOAA, increment P Corp. Michael Baker INTERNATIONAL O 0 2 4 Miles PECHANGA PARKWAY WIDENING PROJECT Sour,- Regional Vicinity Map Exhibit 1 CC J: LL O LIMITS OF ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS Michael Baker INTERNATIONAL JN153547 PECHANGA PARKWAY WIDENING PROJECT Local Vicinity Map Figure 2 Michael Baker INTERNATIONAL jrtuasm 8 g � 6o d EXISTING STORM DR4INI d CHANNEL --- / (-DAYLIGHT Ex. 30,E —PROP Rill 8 A WOLF CREEK DEVELOPMENT TR. 29306 e 8 8 8 re S L-120' 0-io. z R. i 993J- PECHANGA PARKWAY TR. 19939-2 0 20 0 40 5 120 0 0 IA 0) , F W (� _ uiI Z W J W F 2 PECHANGA PARKWAY WIDENING PROJECT Site Plan Figure 3a STORM 7---EXISTING DRAIN CHANNEL DAYLIGHT-) -47- 7-EX. SLOPE --X R/ CAMEO* NIGH PRESSURE GAS LITE. COIIRACIM TO WTIFY NOTI20R4L /A1EIRICAL PRIOR 10 COGT ILCTIGH 8 8 e g nl WOLF VALLEY RD. (SEE SEET 6 FOR CENTERLINE PROFILE) cl 194• 47 .12' ; .35 J5' 12 8 8 8 5 W 6' e WOLF CREEK DEVELOPMENT TR. 29305 (n15 4 ...� SSS :S2 ooh o8g 3d4 /1 7 EX. SLOPE ` <s� 0 o etc 4 • EX. SLOE DAYLILM F}� i4 --OK. yR--:_—_ n 9LTE1fiANi _ PEBGlBAIIDIAN RESOTVATIO4 8 Michael Baker INTERNATIONAL JN 15351E id L•120' 6N' TR. 19939-2 q �IA EDUARD .2X t�� •go lis PECHANGA PARKWAY PECHANGA CASINO 2 . R/4- 9. • 8 a d R-te• 40 20 0 40 m 120 PECHANGA PARKWAY WIDENING PROJECT IS/MND Site Plan Figure 3b Michael Michael Baker INTERNATIONAL jN,53a7 0 0 0 QLIZ w En= wO) z J w I rn U 1— ,-0411_0341" L=50' F12.56 8 9d a WOLF CREEK DEVELOPMENT TR. 29305 EXIST NC 17; / DRAIN CHANNEL Sbi SEX S E L=120' POD 8b P CHAI\GA CASINO N. TtTI i ce a PECHANGA CASINO CSIru f w PECHANGA PARKWAY 0 0 1— LD Vw wcn Z J w 0 2 40 20 0 40 20 PECHANGA PARKWAY WIDENING PROJECT IS/MND Site Plan Figure 3c Michael Baker INTERNATIONAL JN 15354] WOLF cPr5,K DEV LOPMEAT TR, 29306 /Df2Aii�1 114 447'44'53'W CHANNEL 115 ---- Dom/ REsxvAifa � --r PCCHANCRA CASINO PECHANGA PARKWAY 1' 4IN. i(TYP) 40 20 0 40 120 PECHANGA PARKWAY WIDENING PROJECT IS/MND Site Plan Figure 3d Attachment B Riverside County Integrated Project Conservation Summary Report 12/5/2016 Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) ,,F,Riverside County Transporation and Land Management Agency - TLMA Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) APN CeII CeII Group Acres ( Area Plan Sub Unit 921020028 Not A Valid Parcel Number 961020027 Not A Part Independent 8.5 Southwest Area Not a Part 962010037 Not A Part Independent 10.19 Southwest Area Not a Part HABITAT ASSESSMENTS Habitat assessment shall be required and should address at a minimum potential habitat for the following species: APN Amphibia Burrowing Criteria Area Mammalian Narrow Endemic Special Linkage Species Owl Species Species Plant Species Area 961020027 NO YES NO NO NO NO 962010037 NO YES NO NO NO NO Burrowing Owl Burrowing owl. If potential habitat for these species is determined to be located on the property, focused surveys may be required during the appropriate season. Background The final MSHCP was approved by the County Board of Supervisors on June 17, 2003. The federal and state permits were issued on June 22, 2004 and implementation of the MSHCP began on June 23, 2004. For more information concerning the MSHCP, contact your local city or the County of Riverside for the unincorporated areas. Additionally, the Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority (RCA), which oversees all the cities and County implementation of the MSHCP, can be reached at: Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority 3403 loth Street, Suite 320 Riverside, CA 92501 Phone: 951-955-9700 Fax: 951-955-8873 http://www5.rctlma.org/cgi-bin/TED060209rciprepgenNEW.pI 1/2 12/5/2016 Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) www.wrc-rca.org Go Back To Previous Page GIS Home Page TLMA Horne Page http://www5.rctlma.org/cgi-bin/TED060209rciprepgenNEW.pI 2/2 Attachment C Site Photographs Attachment C — Site Photographs Photograph 1: Looking northwest along the north side of Pechanga Parkway from N. Casino Drive. Photograph 2: Looking northwest at the landscaped slope of Wolf Valley Creek Channel, north of the project site. Pechanga Parkway Widening Project Habitat Assessment and MSHCP Consistency Analysis Michael Baker INTERNATIONAL Attachment C — Site Photographs Photograph 3: Looking at the cattail and bulrush in the active channel of Wolf Valley Creek Channel. Photograph 4: Looking at the landscaped area between Pechanga Parkway and Wolf Valley Creek Channel. Pechanga Parkway Widening Project Habitat Assessment and MSHCP Consistency Analysis Michael Baker INTERNATIONAL Attachment D Potentially Occurring Sensitive Biological Resources Scientific Name Special -Status Wildlife Aspidoscelis hyperythra Athene cunicularia Bombus crotchii Buteo swainsoni Crotalus ruber Dipodomys stephensi Emys marmorata Eumops perotis californicus Gila orcuttii Perognathus longimembris brevinasus Phrynosoma blainvillii Polioptila californica californica Spea hammondii Streptocephalus woottoni Special -Status Plants Abronia villosa var. aurita Arctostaphylos rainbowensis Astragalus pachypus var. jaegeri Berberis nevinii Brodiaea orcuttii Dodecahema leptoceras Horkelia cuneata var. puberula Lasthenia glabrata ssp. coulteri Pseudognaphalium leucocephalum Special -Status Plant Communities Southern Willow Scrub Common Name orangethroat whiptail burrowing owl Crotch bumble bee Swainson's hawk red -diamond rattlesnake Stephens' kangaroo rat western pond turtle western mastiff bat arroyo chub Los Angeles pocket mouse coast horned lizard coastal California gnatcatcher western spadefoot Riverside fairy shrimp chaparral sand -verbena Rainbow manzanita Jaeger's milk -vetch Nevin's barberry Orcutt's brodiaea slender -horned spineflower mesa horkelia Coulter's goldfields white rabbit -tobacco Pechanga Creek Widening Project Habitat Assessment and A SHCP Consistency, Analysis Attachment D Potentially Occurring Special -Status Biological Resources Federal Status State Status CNPS Rare Plant Rank Potential to Occur None WL None CSC None None None Threatened None CSC Endangered Threatened None CSC None CSC None CSC None CSC None CSC Threatened CSC None CSC Endangered None None None 1 B.1 None None 1 B.1 None None 1B.1 Endangered Endangered 1B. 1 None None IB.1 Endangered Endangered 1B.1 None None 1 B.1 None None I B.1 None None 2B.2 None Presumed Absent Presumed Absent Presumed Absent Presumed Absent Presumed Absent Presumed Absent Presumed Absent Presumed Absent Presumed Absent Presumed Absent Presumed Absent Presumed Absent Presumed Absent Presumed Absent Presumed Absent Presumed Absent Presumed Absent Presumed Absent Presumed Absent Presumed Absent Presumed Absent Presumed Absent Presumed Absent None Absent City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening Appendix C: Cultural Resources Assessment December 2016 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT Pechanga Parkway Widening Project Temecula, Riverside County, California Prepared for: Darren Edgington Michael Baker International 40810 County Center Drive, Suite 100 Temecula, California 92591-6022 Prepared by: David Brunzell, M.A., RPA BCR Consulting LLC 1420 Guadalajara Place Claremont, California 91711 Project No. RBF1611 Data Base (NADB) Information: Type of Study: Reconnaissance Survey Resources Recorded: None USGS Quadrangles: 7.5 -minute Pechanga (1975) and Temecula (1997) California BCRCONSULTING LLC October 19, 2016 OCTOBER 19, 2016 BCR CONSULTING LLC CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT PECHANGA PARKWAY WIDENING PROJECT MANAGEMENT SUMMARY BCR Consulting LLC (BCR Consulting) is under contract to Michael Baker International to complete a Cultural Resources Assessment of the Pechanga Parkway Widening Project (the project) located in Temecula, Riverside County, California. A cultural resources records search, reconnaissance level pedestrian field survey, Tribal Scoping, and paleontological map review were conducted for the project in partial fulfillment of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The records search revealed that 27 cultural resource studies have taken place resulting in the recording of 26 cultural resources within one mile of the project site. Of the 27 previous studies, four have assessed the project site resulting in no cultural resources recorded within its boundaries. Four cultural resources (including three prehistoric isolates and one prehistoric site with a historic component) have been recorded adjacent to its boundaries. During the field survey, BCR Consulting did not discover any cultural resources, including prehistoric or historic -period archaeological sites or historic -period buildings, within the project boundaries. However, since numerous cultural resources have been recorded in the vicinity (and four are adjacent) the project site is considered sensitive for buried cultural resources. Based on these results, BCR Consulting recommends that a professional archaeological monitor be present to monitor any ground -disturbing activities associated with the proposed project. The monitor shall work under the direct supervision of a Cultural Resource Professional that meets the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualification Standards for Archaeology (the qualified archaeologist). The monitor shall be authorized to temporarily stop and divert construction equipment to investigate any areas suspected to contain cultural resources. Excavation will cease in the area surrounding any cultural resource discoveries until the qualified archaeologist can evaluate the discovery for California Register of Historical Resources eligibility. Evaluations shall take place in consultation with the City and any participating Native American entities. Non -eligible resources would not merit further consideration. Eligible discoveries would be mitigated by avoidance or data recovery. If human remains are encountered during any proposed project activities, State Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 states that no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. The County Coroner must be notified of the find immediately. If the remains are determined prehistoric, the Coroner will notify the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), which will determine and notify a Most Likely Descendant (MLD). With the permission of the landowner or his/her authorized representative, the MLD may inspect the site of the discovery. The MLD shall complete the inspection within 48 hours of notification by the NAHC. ii OCTOBER 19, 2016 BCR CONSULTING LLC CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT PECHANGA PARKWAY WIDENING PROJECT TABLE OF CONTENTS MANAGEMENT SUMMARY INTRODUCTION 1 NATURAL SETTING 1 CULTURAL SETTING 1 PREHISTORIC CONTEXT 1 ETHNOGRAPHY 3 HISTORY 4 PERSONNEL 4 METHODS 4 RESEARCH 4 FIELD SURVEY 5 RESULTS 5 RESEARCH 5 FIELD SURVEY 6 RECOMMENDATIONS 6 CERTIFICATION 6 REFERENCES 7 FIGURES 1: Project Location and Vicinity Maps 2 TABLES A: Cultural Resource Records Search Results 5 APPENDICES A: TRIBAL SCOPING B: PROJECT PHOTOGRAPHS C: PALEONTOLOGICAL SENSITIVITY MAP OCTOBER 19, 2016 BCR CONSULTING LLC CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT PECHANGA PARKWAY WIDENING PROJECT INTRODUCTION BCR Consulting LLC (BCR Consulting) is under contract to Michael Baker International to complete a Cultural Resources Assessment of the Pechanga Parkway Widening Project (the project) located in Temecula, Riverside County, California. A cultural resources records search, reconnaissance level pedestrian field survey, Tribal Scoping, and paleontological map review were conducted for the project site in partial fulfillment of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The project site is located within a non -sectioned portion of Township 8 South, Range 2 West, San Bernardino Baseline and Meridian. It is depicted on the United States Geological Survey (USGS) Pechanga (1997) and Temecula (1975), California 7.5 -minute topographic quadrangles (Figure 1). NATURAL SETTING The elevation of the project site ranges from approximately 960 to 1170 feet above mean sea level (AMSL). It exhibits a northwesterly aspect and occupies a portion of the Temecula Creek and Pechanga Creek watersheds. Artificial disturbances associated with the existing road and adjacent municipal, commercial, and residential installations are severe (see USGS 1975). Coastal sage scrub, oak woodland, and riparian habitat vegetation communities are typical of the area. For details on local prehistoric (particularly Luiseno) use of plant and animal species, see Bean and Shipek (1978:552) and Oxendine (1983:19-29). Sparkman (1908) and Bean and Saubel (1972) can be referenced to review prehistoric harvesting and processing methods, and seasons and conditions in which edible plants grow locally. The project site is located in the Peninsular Range geologic province of California that encompasses western Riverside County. It occupies the eastern margin of the Perris Block (Kenney 1999), which is bounded on the east by the San Jacinto Fault (Reynolds 1988, Morton 1972, 1977). Crystalline rocks present in the region include late Jurassic and cretaceous granitics of the southern California batholith. These resistant rocks weather to form gray or tan colored, boulder -covered conical buttes and hills. Locally, a thin veneer of Holocene soils typically obscures late Pleistocene sediments that often erode away to reveal the base of local boulder outcrops (Rogers 1965). During prehistory in Western Riverside County the boulders that form such outcrops were widely utilized as milling slicks for seed processing, although no boulders of this type were observed in the project site area. Decomposing granite in the form of brown silty sand dominates sediments observed within the project site. CULTURAL SETTING Prehistoric Context The local prehistoric cultural setting has been organized into many chronological frameworks (see Warren and Crabtree 1986; Bettinger and Taylor 1974; Lanning 1963; Hunt 1960; Wallace 1958, 1962, 1977; Wallace and Taylor 1978; Campbell and Campbell 1935), although there is no definitive sequence for the region. The difficulties in establishing cultural chronologies for Riverside County are a function of its enormous size and the small amount of archaeological excavations conducted there. Moreover, throughout prehistory many groups have occupied the area and their territories often overlap spatially and 1 17, awl caster ` / ` r')"tCie01 SafGabriel .0.4. cats -I k 4�ade? INSantaY Project I �0i •Ri a•..ide ` onGAx L�o•�ng Beac 9J c t', 0� 4icwpo- :each ii,dio SanN Juantstano P, 'n�, y sant,. R1t un �� Catalina Oceanside• • Escondido Imperial ns\ C't1 V „tB.:twlyny CI elCefaro. cave:,_ „otYu • Is 0 Avsnue Palsano 0 50 100 Emm=amomMiies sr� ! 'aV"114`a 1N1: i&fteMil W.{ti' 'BCRCONSULTING LLC \. ^.Wwmp Mqn nems, e 7075 _ii rt f1 tv"�: Ips 0 0.25 0.5 1 Kilometers 0 025 05 Project Location Pechanga Parkway Widening Project Reference ESRI USGS Quad Temecula 1975 and Pecha •a 1997 Cerebrum Figure 1 1 Miles#}1_\'!".:+4'+1:1wff Michael Baker International 40810 County Center Drive. Suite 100 Temecula, California 92591 OCTOBER 19, 2016 BCR CONSULTING LLC CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT PECHAGA PARKWAY WIDENING PROJECT chronologically resulting in mixed artifact deposits. Due to dry climate and capricious geological processes, these artifacts rarely become integrated in-situ. Lacking a milieu hospitable to the preservation of cultural midden, local chronologies have relied upon temporally diagnostic artifacts, such as projectile points, or upon the presence/absence of other temporal indicators, such as groundstone. Such methods are instructive, but can be limited by prehistoric occupants' concurrent use of different artifact styles, or by artifact re- use or re -sharpening, as well as researchers' mistaken diagnosis, and other factors (see Flenniken 1985; Flenniken and Raymond 1986; Flenniken and Wilke 1989). Recognizing the shortcomings of comparative temporal indicators, this study recommends review of Warren and Crabtree (1986), who have drawn upon this method to produce a commonly cited and relatively comprehensive chronology. Ethnography The APE is situated within the traditional boundaries of the Luiserio (Bean and Shipek 1978; Kroeber 1925). Typically, the native culture groups in southern California are named after nearby Spanish missions, and such is the case for this Takic-speaking population. For instance, the term "Luiseno" is applied to the natives inhabiting the region within the "ecclesiastical jurisdiction of Mission San Luis Rey...[and who shared] an ancestral relationship which is evident in their cosmogony, and oral tradition, common language, and reciprocal relationship in ceremonies" (Oxendine 1983:8). The first written accounts of the Luiseno are attributed to the mission fathers. Sparkman (1908), Oxendine (1983) and others produced later documentation. Prior to Spanish occupation of California, the territory of the Luiseno extended along the coast from Agua Hedionda Creek to the south, Aliso Creek to the northwest, and the Elsinore Valley and Palomar Mountain to the east. These territorial boundaries were somewhat fluid and changed through time. They encompassed diverse environments that included coastal beaches, lagoons and marshes, inland river valleys and foothills, and mountain groves of oaks and evergreens (Bean and Shipek 1978:551). Like other Native American groups in southern California, the Luiseno caught and collected seasonally available food resources, and led a semi -sedentary lifestyle. Luiseno villages generally were located in valley bottoms, along streams, or along coastal strands near mountain ranges sheltered in canyons, near a water source, and in a location that was easily defended. Individuals from these villages took advantage of the varied resources available. They also established seasonal camps along the coast and near bays and estuaries to gather shellfish and hunt waterfowl (Kroeber 1925, Bean and Shipek 1978). The Luiseno lived in small communities, which were the focus of family life. Luiserio villages were politically independent, administered by a hereditary chief, and occupied by patrilineally linked extended families (Kroeber 1925; Bean and Shipek 1978). The Luiseno believed in private property, which covered items and land owned by the village, as well as items (houses, gardens, ritual equipment, trade beads, eagle nests, and songs) owned by individuals. Trespass against any property was punished (Bean and Shipek 1978:551). Luiseno subsistence was based primarily on seeds like acorns, grass seed, Manzanita, sunflower, sage, chia, and pine nuts. Seeds were dried and ground to be cooked into a mush. Game animals such as deer, rabbit, jackrabbit, wood rat, mice, antelope, and many types of birds supplemented their vegetal intake (Lightfoot and Parrish 2009:341-362). The Luiseno utilized fire for crop management and communal rabbit drives (ibid.; Bean and Shipek 1978:552). 3 OCTOBER 19, 2016 BCR CONSULTING LLC CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT PECHAGA PARKWAY WIDENING PROJECT History Historic -era California is generally divided into three periods: the Spanish or Mission Period (1769 to 1821), the Mexican or Rancho Period (1821 to 1848), and the American Period (1848 to present). Spanish Period. The first European to pass through the vicinity is thought to be a Spaniard called Father Francisco Garces. Having become familiar with the area, Garces acted as a guide to Juan Bautista de Anza, who had been commissioned to lead a group across the desert from a Spanish outpost in Arizona to set up quarters at the Mission San Gabriel in 1771 near what today is Pasadena (Beck and Haase 1974). Garces was followed by Alta California Governor Pedro Fages, who briefly explored the region in 1772. Searching for San Diego Presidio deserters, Fages had traveled through Riverside to San Bernardino, crossed over the mountains into the Mojave Desert, and then journeyed westward to the San Joaquin Valley (Beck and Haase 1974). Mexican Period. In 1821, Mexico overthrew Spanish rule and the missions began to decline. By 1833, the Mexican government passed the Secularization Act, and the missions, reorganized as parish churches, lost their vast land holdings, and released their neophytes (Beattie and Beattie 1974). American Period. The American Period, 1848—Present, began with the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo. In 1850, California was accepted into the Union of the United States primarily due to the population increase created by the Gold Rush of 1849. The cattle industry reached its greatest prosperity during the first years of the American Period. Mexican Period land grants had created large pastoral estates in California, and demand for beef during the Gold Rush led to a cattle boom that lasted from 1849-1855. However, beginning about 1855, the demand for beef began to decline due to imports of sheep from New Mexico and cattle from the Mississippi and Missouri Valleys. When the beef market collapsed, many California ranchers lost their ranchos through foreclosure. A series of disastrous floods in 1861-1862, followed by a significant drought diminished the economic impact of local ranching. This decline combined with ubiquitous agricultural and real estate developments of the late 19th century, set the stage for diversified economic pursuits that have continued to proliferate to this day (Beattie and Beattie 1974; Cleland 1941). PERSONNEL David Brunzell, M.A., RPA acted as the Project Manager and Principal Investigator for the current study. Mr. Brunzell also compiled the technical report and initiated the Tribal Scoping. BCR Consulting Staff Archaeologist Judy Bernal, B.A., completed the cultural resources records search and performed the field survey. METHODS Research Prior to fieldwork, a records search was conducted at the Eastern Information Center (EIC), the local clearinghouse for cultural resource records. This archival research reviewed the status of all recorded historic and prehistoric cultural resources, and survey and excavation 4 OCTOBER 19, 2016 BCR CONSULTING LLC CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT PECHAGA PARKWAY WIDENING PROJECT reports completed within one mile of the project site. Additional resources reviewed included the National Register of Historic Places, the California Register of Historical Resources, and documents and inventories published by the California Office of Historic Preservation. These include the lists of California Historical Landmarks, California Points of Historical Interest, Listing of National Register Properties, and Inventory of Historic Structures. Field Survey An archaeological field survey of the project site was conducted on August 22, 2016. The survey was conducted by walking parallel transects along 100 percent of the alignment frontage. Soil exposures were carefully inspected for evidence of cultural resources. RESULTS Research Research completed through the EIC revealed that 27 cultural resource studies have taken place resulting in the recording of 26 cultural resources within one mile of the project site. Of the 27 previous studies, four have assessed the project site resulting in no cultural resources recorded within its boundaries. Four cultural resources (including three prehistoric isolates and one prehistoric site with a historic component) have been recorded adjacent to its boundaries. A summary of the records search is included below. Table A. Cultural Resource Records Search Results USGS 7.5 Minute Quadrangles Resources Within One Mile of Project Site (Location) Studies Within One Mile of Project Site Pechanga (1975) and Temecula P-33-1460: Prehistoric Site (1/2 Mile SW) P-33-2536: Prehistoric/Historic-Period Site (1/2 Mile SW) RI -111, 213, 513, 545*, 1048, 1604, 1857*, (1997), California P -33-4707/H: Prehistoric/Historic-Period Site (Adjacent N) 2070, 2261, 2343, 3189, P-33-7848: Historic -Period Site (1/8 Mile SW) 3436, 3437, 3440, 3589, P-33-7849: Historic -Period Site (1/4 Mile S) 3440, 4147, 4346, 4356, P-33-7859: Historic -Period Site (1/4 Mile S) 4654, 5145, 5431, 5539, P-33-7860: Prehistoric Site (1/4 Mile SW) 5880, 6790`, 7096*, P-33-7861: Prehistoric Site (1/4 Mile SW) 8408 P-33-7862: Prehistoric Site (1/2 Mile S) P-33-7863: Historic -Period Site (3/4 Mile S) P-33-7864: Prehistoric Site (1/2 Mile S) P-33-7865: Prehistoric Site (1/2 Mile S) P-33-7906: Prehistoric/Historic-Period Site (3/4 Mile SW) P-33-7907: Prehistoric Site (1/2 Mile SW) P-33-7909: Prehistoric/Historic-Period Site (1 Mile SW) P-33-11005: Prehistoric Site (1/2 Mile NW) P-33-11069: Prehistoric Site (1/2 Mile SW) P-33-11070: Prehistoric Site (1/2 Mile SW) P-33-18091: Historic -Period Site (1/2 Mile SW) P-33-22168: Historic -Period Site (3/4 Mile SW) P-33-22170: Prehistoric/Historic-Period Site (1/2 Mile SW) P-33-22171: Historic -Period Site (3/4 Mile SW) P-33-24088: Prehistoric Isolate (1/4 Mile NE) P-33-24089: Prehistoric Isolate (Adjacent N) P-33-24090: Prehistoric Isolate (Adjacent N) P-33-24091: Prehistoric (Adjacent N) revlously assessed a portion of the project site. 5 OCTOBER 19, 2016 BCR CONSULTING LLC CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT PECHAGA PARKWAY WIDENING PROJECT Field Survey During the field survey, BCR Consulting archaeologists did not record any cultural resources within the project site boundaries. The project site exhibited approximately 10 percent surface visibility. Artificial disturbances associated with the existing road and adjacent municipal, commercial, and residential installations were severe. The non -built portions of the project site exhibit sparse native and non-native grasses and scrub brush, particularly along the alignment's northern frontage near the northwestern terminus, and at a vacant lot located at the northwestern intersection of Pechanga Parkway and Loma Linda Road. RECOMMENDATIONS The records search and field survey did not identify any cultural resources, including prehistoric or historic -period archaeological sites or historic -period buildings, currently located within the project boundaries. However, since numerous cultural resources have been recorded in the vicinity (four adjacent) the project site is considered sensitive for buried cultural resources. Based on these results, BCR Consulting recommends that a professional archaeological monitor be present to monitor any ground -disturbing activities associated with the proposed project. The monitor shall work under the direct supervision of a Cultural Resource Professional that meets the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualification Standards for Archaeology (the qualified archaeologist). The monitor shall be authorized to divert construction equipment to investigate any areas suspected to contain cultural resources. Excavation will cease in the area surrounding any cultural resource discoveries until the qualified archaeologist can evaluate the discovery for California Register of Historical Resources eligibility. Evaluations shall take place in consultation with the City and any participating Native American entities. Non -eligible resources would not merit further consideration. Eligible discoveries would be mitigated by avoidance or data recovery. If human remains are encountered during any proposed project activities, State Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 states that no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner determines origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. The County Coroner must be notified of the find immediately. If the remains are determined to be prehistoric, the Coroner will notify the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), which will determine and notify a Most Likely Descendant (MLD). With the permission of the landowner or representative, the MLD may inspect the discovery site. The MLD shall complete inspection within 48 hours of notification by the NAHC. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this archaeological report, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Date: October 19, 2016 David Brunzell Authorized Signature Printed Name 6 OCTOBER 19, 2016 BCR CONSULTING LLC CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT PECHAGA PARKWAY WIDENING PROJECT REFERENCES Beattie, George W., and Helen P. Beattie 1974 Heritage of the Valley: San Bernardino's First Century. Biobooks: Oakland. Bean, Lowell John, and Florence Shipek 1978 California, edited by R.F. Heizer. Handbook of North American Indians, Vol. 8, W.C. Sturtevant, general editor, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. Bean, Lowell John and Katherine Siva Saubel 1972 Temalpakh. Malki Museum Press. Banning, California. Beck, Warren A., and Ynez D. Haase 1974 Historical Atlas of California. Oklahoma City: University of Oklahoma Press. Bettinger, Robert L., and R.E. Taylor 1974 Suggested Revisions in Archaeological Sequences of the Great Basin and Interior Southern California. Nevada Archaeological Survey Research Papers 3:1-26. Campbell, E., and W. Campbell 1935 The Pinto Basin. Southwest Museum Papers 9:1-51. Cleland, Robert Glass 1941 The Cattle on a Thousand Hills—Southern California, 1850-80. San Marino, California: Huntington Library. Flenniken, J.J. 1985 Stone Tool Reduction Techniques as Cultural Markers. Stone Tool Analysis: Essays in Honor of Don E. Crabtree, edited by M.G. Plew, J.C. Woods, and M.G. Pavesic. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque. Flenniken, J.J. and A.W. Raymond 1986 Morphological Projectile Point Typology: Replication, Experimentation, and Technological Analysis. American Antiquity 51:603-614. Flenniken, J.J. and Philip J. Wilke 1989 Typology, Technology, and Chronology of Great Basin Dart Points. American Anthropologist 91:149-158. Hunt, Alice P. 1960 The Archaeology of the Death Valley Salt Pan, California. University of Utah Anthropological Papers No. 47. Kenney, M.D. 1999 Introduction to the Natural History of Southern California. California Natural History Guides: 13. Los Angeles: University of California Press. 7 OCTOBER 19, 2016 BCR CONSULTING LLC CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT PECHAGA PARKWAY WIDENING PROJECT Kroeber, Alfred L. 1925 Handbook of the Indians of California. Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin 78. Washington D.C.: Smithsonian Institution. Reprinted in 1976, New York: Dover Publications. Lanning, Edward P. 1963 The Archaeology of the Rose Spring Site (Iny-372). University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology 49(3):237-336. Lightfoot, Kent G., Otis Parrish 2009 California Indians and Their Environment, an Introduction. University of California Press, Berkeley. Morton, D.M. 1972 Geology of the Lakeview -Perris Quadrangle, Riverside County, California, CDMG, Map Sheet 19, Scale 1:24,000. 1977 Surface Deformation in Part of the San Jacitno Valley, Southern California, in Journal of Research, Vol. 5, No. 1, Jan -Feb. 1977, pp. 117-124. Oxendine, Joan 1983 The Luiseno Village During the Late Prehistoric Era. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of California, Riverside. Reynolds, R.E. 1988 Paleontologic Resource Overview and Management Plan for Edwards Air Force Base, California. San Bernardino County Museum, Redlands, California. Rogers, M.J. 1965 Early Lithic Industries of the Lower Basin of the Colorado River and Adjacent Desert Areas. San Diego Museum Papers No. 3. Sparkman, Philip S. 1908 The Culture of the Luiseno Indians. University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology 8(4). University of California, Berkeley. United States Geological Survey 1975 Temecula, California 7.5 -minute topographic quadrangle map 1997 Pechanga, California 7.5 -minute topographic quadrangle map Wallace, William J. 1958 Archaeological Investigation in Death Valley National Monument. University of California Archaeological Survey Reports 42:7-22. 1962 Prehistoric Cultural Development in the Southern California Deserts. American Antiquity 28(2):172-180. 8 OCTOBER 19, 2016 BCR CONSULTING LLC CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT PECHAGA PARKWAY WIDENING PROJECT 1977 A Half Century of Death Valley Archaeology. The Journal of California Anthropology 4(2):249-258. Wallace, William J., and Edith S. Taylor 1978 Ancient Peoples and Cultures of Death Valley National Monument. Acoma Books, Ramona, California. Warren, Claude N., and R.H. Crabtree 1986 The Prehistory of the Southwestern Great Basin. In Handbook of the North American Indians, Vol. 11, Great Basin, edited by W.L. d'Azevedo, pp.183-193. W.C. Sturtevant, General Editor. Smithsonian Institution, Washington D.C. 9 OCTOBER 19, 2016 BCR CONSULTING LLC CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT PECHAGA PARKWAY WIDENING PROJECT APPENDIX A TRIBAL SCOPING Subject: BCR Consulting SLF/List of Tribes Request, Pechanga Pkwy Widening, Temecula, Riverside County From: David Brunzell (david.brunzell@yahoo.com) To: gayle.totton@nahc.ca.gov; Date: Monday, September 12, 2016 3:18 PM Hi Gayle, I'd like to request a Sacred Lands File Search and list of potentially interested tribes for the proposed Pechanga Parkway Widening Project in the City of Temecula, Riverside County, California. The lead agency for this project is the City of Temecula. The Project will be located as follows (SBBM; see attached project location map): Township 8 South Range 2 West Non -sectioned USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Quads: Temecula (1975) and Pechanga (1997), California Please send the results and list to my email and please get in touch with any questions. Thanks, David Brunzell Principal Investigator/Archaeologist BCR Consulting LLC Certified Small Business (SB) 1420 Guadalajara Place Claremont, California 91711 909-525-7078 www.bcrconsulting.net Attachments • Fig 1.pdf (554.69KB) Temec Project Location Mt PFc. it 41 • `` I Lancaster wtC�eh 4zz',,�ySanGtilabtsrul ocP 4a<c• • ,�� . e �. f Santat'i•4 dera tae Prr asp • NG�� Long Beae Sant, u•a Santa* Catalina temente VI tde } a��e�91 ` aim rings N, VAI•lcwpo- : each 16dw r N,r• Juan+ Be.'oma;"f� 11` Ip otrano id �i Oceanside. • Escondido Imperial na+ G0v1 „4rawiey Et cenxita _Yu • ICiimmo is /,. 0 50 100 Miles Kilometers Avenue Poise 0.25 0.5 o BCRCONSULTING LLC claw M.Y TMKrM1 www Oomwfi'+9.M OM 527 7071 rn •iLd1111•11111l .itA LFII Project Location Pechanga Parkway Widening Project Reference ESRI USGS Quad Temecula 1975 and Pechar .a (159 - Figure 159 - Figure 1 Michael Baker International 40810 County Center Drive. Suite 100 Temecula. California 92591 STATE Q S;ALIFORNIA Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Governor NATIVE AMERICAN HERITAGE COMMISSION 1650 Harbor Blvd., Suite 100 West Sacramento, CA 96691 (916) 373-3710 (916) 373-5471 FAX September 13, 2016 David Brunzell BCR Consulting Sent by E-mail: David.brunzell@yahoo.com RE: Proposed Pechanga Parkway Widening Project, City of Temecula; Temecula and Pechanga USGS Quadrangles, Riverside County, California Dear Mr. Brunzell: Attached is a consultation list of tribes with traditional lands or cultural places located within the boundaries of the above referenced counties. A record search of the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) Sacred Lands File (SLF) was completed for the area of potential project effect (APE) for the above referenced project. Sites have been recorded In the APE you provided that may be impacted by the project. Please contact the Pechanqa Band of Mission Indians at (951) 770-6000 or (951) 770-8100 for more information about the sites. Please contact ALL of the culturally affiliated Tribes on the attached Tribal Contact List directly for more information about other potential sites within your APE. Our records indicate that the lead agency for this project has not requested a Native American Contact List for the purposes of consultation. Please note that the intent of the referenced codes below is to mitigate impacts to tribal cultural resources, as defined, for California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) projects. As of July 1, 2015, Public Resources Code Sections 21080.3.1 and 21080.3.2 require public agencies to consult with California Native American tribes identified by the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) for the purpose mitigating impacts to tribal cultural resources: Within 14 days of determining that an application for a project is complete or a decision by a public agency to undertake a project, the lead agency shall provide formal notification to the designated contact of, or a tribal representative of, traditionally and culturally affiliated California Native American tribes that have requested notice, which shall be accomplished by means of at least one written notification that includes a brief description of the proposed project and its location, the lead agency contact information, and a notification that the California Native American tribe has 30 days to request consultation pursuant to this section. (Public Resources Code Section 21080.3.1(d)) The law does not preclude agencies from initiating consultation with the tribes that are culturally and traditionally affiliated with their jurisdictions. The NAHC believes that in fact that this is the best practice to ensure that tribes are consulted commensurate with the intent of the law. In accordance with Public Resources Code Section 21080.3.1(d), formal notification must include a brief description of the proposed project and its location, the lead agency contact information, and a notification that the California Native American tribe has 30 days to request consultation. The NAHC believes that agencies should also include with their notification letters information regarding any cultural resources assessment that has been completed on the APE, such as: 1. The results of any record search that may have been conducted at an Information Center of the California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS), including, but not limited to: • A listing of any and all known cultural resources have already been recorded on or adjacent to the APE; • Copies of any and all cultural resource records and study reports that may have been provided by the Information Center as part of the records search response; ■ If the probability is low, moderate, or high that cultural resources are located in the APE. • Whether the records search indicates a low, moderate or high probability that unrecorded cultural resources are located in the potential APE; and • If a survey is recommended by the Information Center to determine whether previously unrecorded cultural resources are present. 2. The results of any archaeological inventory survey that was conducted, including: Any report that may contain site forms, site significance, and suggested mitigation measurers. All information regarding site locations, Native American human remains, and associated funerary objects should be in a separate confidential addendum, and not be made available for pubic disclosure in accordance with Government Code Section 6254.10. 3. The results of any Sacred Lands File (SFL) check conducted through Native American Heritage Commission. The Sacred Lands File list is not exhaustive. A tribe may be the only source of information. 4. Any ethnographic studies conducted for any area including all or part of the potential APE; and 5. Any geotechnical reports regarding all or part of the potential APE. Lead agencies should be aware that records maintained by the NAHC and CHRIS is not exhaustive, and a negative response to these searches does not preclude the existence of a cultural place. A tribe may be the only source of information regarding the existence of a tribal cultural resource. This information will aid tribes in determining whether to request formal consultation. In the case that they do, having the information beforehand well help to facilitate the consultation process. If you receive notification of change of addresses and phone numbers from tribes, please notify me. With your assistance we are able to assure that our consultation list contains current information. If you have any questions, please contact me at my email address: gayle.totton@nahc.ca.gov. Sincerely, Totton, M.A., PhD. ssociate Governmental Program Analyst CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This communication with its contents may contain confidential and/or legally privileged information. It is solely for the use of the intended recipient(s). Unauthorized interception, review, use or disclosure is prohibited and may violate applicable laws including the Electronic Communications Privacy Act. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy all copies of the communication. Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians Jeff Grubbe, Chairperson 5401 Dinah Shore Drive Palm Springs, CA, 92264 Phone: (760) 699 - 6800 Fax: (760) 699-6919 Native American Heritage Commission Native American Contact List Riverside County 9/13/2016 Cahuilla Luiseno Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians Patricia Garcia -Plotkin, Director 5401 Dinah Shore Drive Cahuilla Palm Springs, CA, 92264 Luiseno Phone: (760) 699 - 6907 Fax: (760) 699-6924 ACBCI-THP0@aguacaliente.net Campo Band of Mission Indians Ralph Goff, Chairperson 36190 Church Road, Suite 1 Kumeyaay Campo, CA, 91906 Phone: (619)478-9046 Fax: (619)478-5818 rgoff@campo-nsn.gov Ewiiaapaayp Tribal Office Michael Garcia, Vice Chairperson 4054 Willows Road Kumeyaay Alpine, CA, 91901 Phone: (619)445-6315 Fax: (619)445-9126 michaelg@leaningrock.net Ewllaapaayp Tribal Office Robert Pinto, Chairperson 4054 Willows Road Alpine, CA, 91901 Phone: (619)445-6315 Fax: (619)445-9126 Jamul Indian Village Erica Pinto, Chairperson P.O. Box 612 Jamul, CA, 91935 Phone: (619)669-4785 Fax: (619)669-4817 Kumeyaay Kumeyaay La Jolla Band of Luiseno Indians Thomas Rodriguez, Chairperson 22000 Highway 76 Pauma Valley, CA, 92061 Phone: (760)742-3771 La Posta Band of Mission Indians Javaughn Miller, Tribal Administrator 8 Crestwood Road Boulevard, CA, 91905 Phone: (619)478-2113 Fax: (619)478-2125 jmiller@ Lapostatribe.net La Posta Band of Mission Indians Gwendolyn Parada, Chairperson 8 Crestwood Road Boulevard, CA, 91905 Phone: (619)478-2113 Fax: (619)478-2125 LP13boots@aol.com Manzanita Band of Kumeyaay Nation Nick Elliott, Cultural Resources Coordinator P. O. Box 1302 Boulevard, CA, 91905 Phone: (619) 766 - 4930 Fax: (619) 766-4957 nickmepa@yahoo.com Luiseno Kumeyaay Kumeyaay Kumeyaay Manzanita Band of Kumeyaay Nation Angela Elliott Santos, Chairperson P.O. Box 1302 Kumeyaay Boulevard, CA, 91905 Phone: (619) 766 - 4930 Fax: (619) 766-4957 This list Is current only as of the date of this document. Distribution of this list does not relieve any person of statutory responsibility as defined in Section 7050.5 of the Health and Salety Code, Section 5097.94 of the Pudic Resource Section 5097.98 of the Public Resourcos Codo. This list is only applicable for contacting local Native Americans with regard to cultural resources assessment for the proposed Pechanga Parkway Widening, Riverside County. PRO3-002153 09/13/2016 08:20 AM 1 of 3 Mesa Grande Band of Mission Indians Virgil Oyos, Chairperson P.O Box 270 Santa Ysabel, CA, 92070 Phone: (760)782-3818 Fax: (760)782-9092 mesagrandeband@msn.com Pala Band of Mission Indians Shasta Gaughan, Tribal Historic Preservation Officer PMB 50, 35008 Pala Temecula Rd. Pala, CA, 92059 Phone: (760) 891 - 3515 Fax: (760) 742-3189 sgaughen@palatribe.com Pauma Band of Luiseno Indians - Pauma & Yuima Reservation Temet Aguilar, Chairperson P.O. Box 369, Ext. 303 Pauma Valley, CA, 92061 Phone: (760)742-1289 Fax: (760)742-3422 Pechanga Band of Mission Indians Paul Macarro, Cultural Resources Manager P.O. Box 1477 Temecula, CA, 92593 Phone: (951) 770 - 8100 Fax: (951) 506-9491 pmacarro@pechanga-nsn.gov Pechanga Band of Mission Indians Anna Hoover, Cultural Analyst P. O. Box 2183 Temecula, CA, 92593 Phone: (951) 770 - 8104 Fax: (951) 694-0446 ahoover@pechanga-nsn.gov Native American Heritage Commission Native American Contact List Riverside County 9/13/2016 Kumeyaay Cupeno Luiseno Luiseno Luiseno Luiseno Pechanga Band of Mission Indians Mark Macarro, Chairperson P.O. Box 1477 Temecula, CA, 92593 Phone: (951) 770 - 6000 Fax: (951) 695-1778 striplett@pechanga-nsn.gov Rincon Band of Mission Indians Bo Mazzetti, Chairperson 1 West Tribal Road Valley Center, CA, 92082 Phone: (760)749-1051 Fax: (760)749-5144 bomazzetti@aol.com Rincon Band of Mission Indians Jim McPherson, Tribal Historic Preservation Officer 1 West Tribal Road Vailey Center, CA, 92082 Phone: (760)749-1051 Fax: (760)749-5144 ywhipple@rincontribe.org San Luis Rey Band of Mission Indians 1889 Sunset Drive Vista, CA, 92081 Phone: (760) 724 - 8505 Fax: (760) 724-2172 cjmojado@slrmissionindians.org San Luis Rey Band of Mission Indians San Luis Rey, Tribal Council 1889 Sunset Drive Vista, CA, 92081 Phone: (760)724-8505 Fax: (760)724-2172 cjmojado@slrmissionindians.org San Pasqua! Band of Mission Indians Allen E. Lawson, Chairperson P.O. Box 365 Valley Center, CA, 92082 Phone: (760)749-3200 Fax: (760)749-3876 allenl@sanpasqualtribe.org Luiseno Luiseno Luiseno Luiseno Luiseno Kumeyaay This list Is current only as of the date of this document. nlstdbutton of this list does not relieve any person of statutory responsibility as defined In Section 7050.5 of the FleaIlh and Safety Code, Section 5097.94 of the Public Resource Section 5097.98 of the Public Resources Coda. This list is only applicable for contacting mal Native Americans with regard to cultural resources assessment for the proposed Pechanga Parkway Widening, Riverside County. PRO3-002153 09/13/2016 08:20 AM 2 of 3 San Pasqua! Band of Mission Indians John Flores, Environmental Coordinator P. O. Box 365 Valley Center, CA, 92082 Phone: (760) 749 - 3200 Fax: (760) 749-3876 johnf@sanpasqualtribe.org Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians Joseph Ontiveros, Cultural Resource Department P.O. BOX 487 San Jacinto, CA, 92581 Phone: (951)663-5279 Fax: (951)654-4198 jontiveros@soboba-nsn.gov Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians Carrie Garcia, Cultural Resources Manager P. O. Box 487 San Jacinto, CA, 92583 Phone: (951)654-2765 Fax: (951)654-4198 carrieg@soboba-nsn.gov Sycuan Band of the Kumeyaay Nation Cody J. Martinez, Chairperson 1 Kwaaypaay Court El Cajon, CA, 92019 Phone: (619)445-2613 Fax: (619)445-1927 ssilva@sycuan-nsn.gov Sycuan Band of the Kumeyaay Nation Lisa Haws, Cultural Resources Manager 1 Kwaaypaay Court El Cajon, CA, 92019 Phone: (619) 445 - 4564 Native American Heritage Commission Native American Contact List Riverside County 9/13/2016 Kumeyaay Cahuilla Luiseno Cahuilla Luiseno Kumeyaay Kumeyaay Viejas Band of Kumeyaay Indians Robert J. Welch, Chairperson 1 Viejas Grade Road Alpine, CA, 91901 Phone: (619)445-3810 Fax: (619)445-5337 jhagen@viejas-nsn.gov Viejas Band of Kumeyaay Indians Julie Hagen, 1 Viejas Grade Road Alpine, CA, 91901 Phone: (619) 445 - 3810 Fax: (619) 445-5337 jhagen@viejas-nsn.gov Kumeyaay Kumeyaay This list Is current only as of the date o1 this document. Distribution of this list does not relieve any person o1 statutory responsibility as defined in Section 7050.5 of the Health and Safety Code, Section 5097.94 of the Public Resource Section 5097.98 o1 the Public Resources Code. This list is only applicable for contacting local Native Americans with regard to cultural resources assessment for the proposed Pechanga Parkway widening, Riverside County. PROJ-002153 09/13/2016 08:20 AM 3 of 3 Native American Consultation Summary for the Pechanga Widening Project, Temecula, Riverside County, California Native American Heritage Commission replied to BCR Consulting Request on September 13, 2016. Results of Sacred Land File Search DID INDICATE presence of Native American cultural resources that could be impacted, and recommended that Pechanga Band of Mission Indians as well as the below groups/individuals be contacted. Groups Contacted Letter/Email Date Response from Tribes Jeff Grubbe, Chairperson Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians Letter: 9/16/16 Email: N/A None Thomas Rodriguez, Chairperson La Jolla Band of Luiseno Indians Letter: 9/16/16 Email: N/A None Patricia Garcia -Plotkin, Director Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians Letter: 9/16/16 Email: 9/17/16 None Javaughn Miller, Tribal Administrator La Posta Band of Mission Indians Letter: 9/16/16 Email: 9/17/16 None Ralph Goff, Chairperson Campo Band of Mission Indians Letter: 9/16/16 Email: 9/17/16 None Gwendolyn Parada, Chairperson La Posta Band of Mission Indians Letter: 9/16/16 Email: 9/17/16 None Michael Garcia, Vice Chairperson Ewiiaapaayp Tribal Office Letter: 9/16/16 Email: 9/17/16 None Nick Elliot, Cultural Resources Coordinator Manzanita Band of Kumeyaay Nation Letter: 9/16/16 Email: 9/17/16 None Robert Pinto, Chairperson Ewiiaapaayp Tribal Office Letter: 9/16/16 Email: N/A None Angela Elliot Santos, Chairperson Manzanita Band of Kumeyaay Nation Letter: 9/16/16 Email: N/A None Erica Pinto, Chairperson Jamul Indian Village Letter: 9/16/16 Email: N/A None Virgil Oyos, Chairperson Morongo Band of Mission Indians Letter: 9/16/16 Email: 9/17/16 None Mark Macarro, Chairperson Pechanga Band of Mission Indians Letter: 9/16/16 Email: 9/17/16 None Shasta Gaughen, Historic Preservation Office Pala Band of Mission Indians Letter: 9/16/16 Email: 9/17/16 None Bo Mazzetti, Chairperson Rincon Band of Mission Indians Letter: 9/16/16 Email: 9/17/16 None Groups Contacted Letter/Email Date Response from Tribes Temet Aguilar, Chairperson Pauma & Yuima Reservation Letter: 9/16/16 Email: N/A None Jim McPherson, Tribal Historic Preservation Officer Rincon Band of Mission Indians Letter: 9/16/16 Email: 9/17/16 None Paul Macarro, Cultural Resources Manager Pechanga Band of Mission Indians Letter: 9/16/16 Email: 9/17/16 None San Luis Rey Band of Mission Indians Letter: 9/16/16 Email: 9/17/16 None Anna Hoover, Cultural Analyst Pechanga Cultural Resources Department Letter: 9/16/16 Email: 9/17/16 None Tribal Council San Luis Rey Band of Mission Indians Letter: 9/16/16 Email: 9/17/16 None Allen E. Lawson, Chairperson San Pasqual Band of Mission Indians Letter: 9/16/16 Email: 9/17/16 None John Flores, Environmental Coordinator San Pasqua) Band of Mission Indians Letter: 9/16/16 Email: 9/17/16 None Robert Welch, Chairperson Viejas Band of Kumeyaay Indians Letter: 9/16/16 Email: 9/17/16 None Joseph Ontiveros, Cultural Resources Department Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians Letter: 9/16/16 Email: 9/17/16 None Julie Hagen Viejas Band of Kumeyaay Indians Letter: 9/16/16 Email: 9/17/16 None Carrie Garcia, Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians Cultural Resources Manager Letter: 9/16/16 Email: 9/17/16 None Cody J. Martinez, Chairperson Sycuan Band of the Kumeyaay Nation Letter: 9/16/16 Email: 9/17/16 None Lisa Haws, Cultural Resources Manager Sycuan Band of the Kumeyaay Nation Letter: 9/16/16 Email: N/A None BCRCOp www.bcrconsulting.net CIa'e^�°^' NSULTING LLC ARCHAEOLOGY HISTORIC PRESERVATION PALEONTOLOGY GIS 909.525.7078 7,; ,,p, September 16, 2016 Jeff Grubbe Chairperson Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians 5401 Dinah Shore Drive Palm Springs, California 92264 Subject: Tribal Scoping for the Pechanga Parkway Widening Project, Temecula, Riverside County, California Dear Mr. Chairperson: This is a tribal scoping letter to solicit your comments on a proposed development project at locations with which you have tribal cultural affiliation. The purpose of the tribal scoping is to ensure the protection of Native American cultural resources on which the proposed undertaking may have an impact. In the tribal scoping process, early communication is encouraged in order to provide for full and reasonable public input from Native American groups and individuals. We understand that much of the content of the communications will be confidential and will include, but not be limited to, the relationship of proposed project details to Native American Cultural Historic Properties, such as burial sites, known or unknown, architectural features and artifacts, ceremonial sites, sacred shrines, and cultural landscapes. The proposed project is located in a non -sectioned portion of Township 8 South, Range 2 West, San Bernardino Baseline and Meridian. The property is depicted on the Temecula (1975), and Pechanga (1997) California 7.5 -minute USGS topographic quadrangles, (see attached map). The lead agency is the City of Temecula. If you know of any cultural resources in the vicinity that may be of religious and/or cultural significance to your community or if you would like more information, please contact me at 909-525-7078 or david.brunzell@yahoo.com. Correspondence can also be sent to BCR Consulting LLC, Attn: David Brunzell, 1420 Guadalajara Place, Claremont, California 91711. I request a response by October 20, 2016. If you require more time, please let me know. Thank you for your involvement in this process. Sincerely, BCR Consulting LLC David Brunzell, M.A./RPA Principal Investigator/Archaeologist Attachment: USGS Map BCRCOp www.bcrconsulting. net Cb,eo,om NSULTING LLC ARCHAEOLOGY HISTORIC PRESERVATION PALEONTOLOGY GIS 909.525.7078 T,,"'P',t,,,, September 16, 2016 Thomas Rodriguez Chairperson La Jolla Band of Luiseno Indians 22000 Highway 76 Pauma Valley, California 92061 Subject: Tribal Scoping for the Pechanga Parkway Widening Project, Temecula, Riverside County, California Dear Mr. Chairperson: This is a tribal scoping letter to solicit your comments on a proposed development project at locations with which you have tribal cultural affiliation. The purpose of the tribal scoping is to ensure the protection of Native American cultural resources on which the proposed undertaking may have an impact. In the tribal scoping process, early communication is encouraged in order to provide for full and reasonable public input from Native American groups and individuals. We understand that much of the content of the communications will be confidential and will include, but not be limited to, the relationship of proposed project details to Native American Cultural Historic Properties, such as burial sites, known or unknown, architectural features and artifacts, ceremonial sites, sacred shrines, and cultural landscapes. The proposed project is located in a non -sectioned portion of Township 8 South, Range 2 West, San Bernardino Baseline and Meridian. The property is depicted on the Temecula (1975), and Pechanga (1997) California 7.5 -minute USGS topographic quadrangles, (see attached map). The lead agency is the City of Temecula. If you know of any cultural resources in the vicinity that may be of religious and/or cultural significance to your community or if you would like more information, please contact me at 909-525-7078 or david.brunzell@yahoo.com. Correspondence can also be sent to BCR Consulting LLC, Attn: David Brunzell, 1420 Guadalajara Place, Claremont, California 91711. I request a response by October 20, 2016. If you require more time, please let me know. Thank you for your involvement in this process. Sincerely, BCR Consulting LLC David Brunzell, M.A./RPA Principal Investigator/Archaeologist Attachment: USGS Map www.bcrconsuking.net Na n,ont BCRCONSULTING LLC ARCHAEOLOGY HISTORIC PRESERVATION PALEONTOLOGY GIS 909.525.7078 TM ap September 16, 2016 Patricia Garcia -Plotkin Director Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians 5401 Dinah Shore Drive Palm Springs, California 92264 Subject: Tribal Scoping for the Pechanga Parkway Widening Project, Temecula, Riverside County, California Dear Patricia: This is a tribal scoping letter to solicit your comments on a proposed development project at locations with which you have tribal cultural affiliation. The purpose of the tribal scoping is to ensure the protection of Native American cultural resources on which the proposed undertaking may have an impact. In the tribal scoping process, early communication is encouraged in order to provide for full and reasonable public input from Native American groups and individuals. We understand that much of the content of the communications will be confidential and will include, but not be limited to, the relationship of proposed project details to Native American Cultural Historic Properties, such as burial sites, known or unknown, architectural features and artifacts, ceremonial sites, sacred shrines, and cultural landscapes. The proposed project is located in a non -sectioned portion of Township 8 South, Range 2 West, San Bernardino Baseline and Meridian. The property is depicted on the Temecula (1975), and Pechanga (1997) California 7.5 -minute USGS topographic quadrangles, (see attached map). The lead agency is the City of Temecula. If you know of any cultural resources in the vicinity that may be of religious and/or cultural significance to your community or if you would like more information, please contact me at 909-525-7078 or david.brunzell@yahoo.com. Correspondence can also be sent to BCR Consulting LLC, Attn: David Brunzell, 1420 Guadalajara Place, Claremont, California 91711. I request a response by October 20, 2016. If you require more time, please let me know. Thank you for your involvement in this process. Sincerely, BCR Consulting LLC David Brunzell, M.A./RPA Principal Investigator/Archaeologist Attachment: USGS Map BCRCONSULTING LLC ARCHAEOLOGY HISTORIC PRESERVATION PALEONTOLOGY GIS www.bcr90 52570781wachaw September 16, 2016 Javaughn Miller Tribal Administrator La Posta Band of Mission Indians 8 Crestwood Road Boulevard, California 91905 Subject: Tribal Scoping for the Pechanga Parkway Widening Project, Temecula, Riverside County, California Dear Javaughn: This is a tribal scoping letter to solicit your comments on a proposed development project at locations with which you have tribal cultural affiliation. The purpose of the tribal scoping is to ensure the protection of Native American cultural resources on which the proposed undertaking may have an impact. In the tribal scoping process, early communication is encouraged in order to provide for full and reasonable public input from Native American groups and individuals. We understand that much of the content of the communications will be confidential and will include, but not be limited to, the relationship of proposed project details to Native American Cultural Historic Properties, such as burial sites, known or unknown, architectural features and artifacts, ceremonial sites, sacred shrines, and cultural landscapes. The proposed project is located in a non -sectioned portion of Township 8 South, Range 2 West, San Bernardino Baseline and Meridian. The property is depicted on the Temecula (1975), and Pechanga (1997) California 7.5 -minute USGS topographic quadrangles, (see attached map). The lead agency is the City of Temecula. If you know of any cultural resources in the vicinity that may be of religious and/or cultural significance to your community or if you would like more information, please contact me at 909-525-7078 or david.brunzell@yahoo.com. Correspondence can also be sent to BCR Consulting LLC, Attn: David Brunzell, 1420 Guadalajara Place, Claremont, California 91711. I request a response by October 20, 2016. If you require more time, please let me know. Thank you for your involvement in this process. Sincerely, BCR Consulting LLC David Brunzell, M.A./RPA Principal Investigator/Archaeologist Attachment: USGS Map www.bcrconsulting.net C",°"'°°' BCRCONSULTING LLC ARCHAEOLOGY HISTORIC PRESERVATION PALEONTOLOGY GIS 909.525.7078 =haw September 16, 2016 Ralph Goff Chairperson Campo Band of Mission Indians 36190 Church Road, Suite 1 Campo, California 91906 Subject: Tribal Scoping for the Pechanga Parkway Widening Project, Temecula, Riverside County, California Dear Mr. Chairperson: This is a tribal scoping letter to solicit your comments on a proposed development project at locations with which you have tribal cultural affiliation. The purpose of the tribal scoping is to ensure the protection of Native American cultural resources on which the proposed undertaking may have an impact. In the tribal scoping process, early communication is encouraged in order to provide for full and reasonable public input from Native American groups and individuals. We understand that much of the content of the communications will be confidential and will include, but not be limited to, the relationship of proposed project details to Native American Cultural Historic Properties, such as burial sites, known or unknown, architectural features and artifacts, ceremonial sites, sacred shrines, and cultural landscapes. The proposed project is located in a non -sectioned portion of Township 8 South, Range 2 West, San Bernardino Baseline and Meridian. The property is depicted on the Temecula (1975), and Pechanga (1997) California 7.5 -minute USGS topographic quadrangles, (see attached map). The lead agency is the City of Temecula. If you know of any cultural resources in the vicinity that may be of religious and/or cultural significance to your community or if you would like more information, please contact me at 909-525-7078 or david.brunzell@yahoo.com. Correspondence can also be sent to BCR Consulting LLC, Attn: David Brunzell, 1420 Guadalajara Place, Claremont, California 91711. I request a response by October 20, 2016. If you require more time, please let me know. Thank you for your involvement in this process. Sincerely, BCR Consulting LLC David Brunzell, M.A./RPA Principal Investigator/Archaeologist Attachment: USGS Map consultin BCRCONSULTING LLC ARCHAEOLOGY HISTORIC PRESERVATION PALEONTOLOGY GIS www.bcr909.5257078I,"'p° September 16, 2016 Gwendolyn Parada Chairperson La Posta Band of Mission Indians 8 Crestwood Road Boulevard, California 91905 Subject: Tribal Scoping for the Pechanga Parkway Widening Project, Temecula, Riverside County, California Dear Ms. Chairperson: This is a tribal scoping letter to solicit your comments on a proposed development project at locations with which you have tribal cultural affiliation. The purpose of the tribal scoping is to ensure the protection of Native American cultural resources on which the proposed undertaking may have an impact. In the tribal scoping process, early communication is encouraged in order to provide for full and reasonable public input from Native American groups and individuals. We understand that much of the content of the communications will be confidential and will include, but not be limited to, the relationship of proposed project details to Native American Cultural Historic Properties, such as burial sites, known or unknown, architectural features and artifacts, ceremonial sites, sacred shrines, and cultural landscapes. The proposed project is located in a non -sectioned portion of Township 8 South, Range 2 West, San Bernardino Baseline and Meridian. The property is depicted on the Temecula (1975), and Pechanga (1997) California 7.5 -minute USGS topographic quadrangles, (see attached map). The lead agency is the City of Temecula. If you know of any cultural resources in the vicinity that may be of religious and/or cultural significance to your community or if you would like more information, please contact me at 909-525-7078 or david.brunzell@yahoo.com. Correspondence can also be sent to BCR Consulting LLC, Attn: David Brunzell, 1420 Guadalajara Place, Claremont, California 91711. I request a response by October 20, 2016. If you require more time, please let me know. Thank you for your involvement in this process. Sincerely, BCR Consulting LLC David Brunzell, M.A./RPA Principal Investigator/Archaeologist Attachment: USGS Map www. bcrconsulting.net c2-0", BCRCONSULTING LLC ARCHAEOLOGY HISTORIC PRESERVATION PALEONTOLOGY GIS 909.5257078re:ac, September 16, 2016 Michael Garcia Vice Chairperson Ewiiaapaayp Tribal Office 4054 Willows Road Alpine, California 91901 Subject: Tribal Scoping for the Pechanga Parkway Widening Project, Temecula, Riverside County, California Dear Michael: This is a tribal scoping letter to solicit your comments on a proposed development project at locations with which you have tribal cultural affiliation. The purpose of the tribal scoping is to ensure the protection of Native American cultural resources on which the proposed undertaking may have an impact. In the tribal scoping process, early communication is encouraged in order to provide for full and reasonable public input from Native American groups and individuals. We understand that much of the content of the communications will be confidential and will include, but not be limited to, the relationship of proposed project details to Native American Cultural Historic Properties, such as burial sites, known or unknown, architectural features and artifacts, ceremonial sites, sacred shrines, and cultural landscapes. The proposed project is located in a non -sectioned portion of Township 8 South, Range 2 West, San Bernardino Baseline and Meridian. The property is depicted on the Temecula (1975), and Pechanga (1997) California 7.5 -minute USGS topographic quadrangles, (see attached map). The lead agency is the City of Temecula. If you know of any cultural resources in the vicinity that may be of religious and/or cultural significance to your community or if you would like more information, please contact me at 909-525-7078 or david.brunzell@yahoo.com. Correspondence can also be sent to BCR Consulting LLC, Attn: David Brunzell, 1420 Guadalajara Place, Claremont, California 91711. I request a response by October 20, 2016. If you require more time, please let me know. Thank you for your involvement in this process. Sincerely, BCR Consulting LLC David Brunzell, M.A./RPA Principal Investigator/Archaeologist Attachment: USGS Map www.bcrconsufting.net B C R CO N S U LT I N G LLC ARCHAEOLOGY HISTORIC PRESERVATION PALEONTOLOGY GIS 909.525.7078=chap. September 16, 2016 Nick Elliot Cultural Resources Coordinator Manzanita Band of Kumeyaay Nation P.O. Box 1302 Boulevard, California 91905 Subject: Tribal Scoping for the Pechanga Parkway Widening Project, Temecula, Riverside County, California Dear Nick: This is a tribal scoping letter to solicit your comments on a proposed development project at locations with which you have tribal cultural affiliation. The purpose of the tribal scoping is to ensure the protection of Native American cultural resources on which the proposed undertaking may have an impact. In the tribal scoping process, early communication is encouraged in order to provide for full and reasonable public input from Native American groups and individuals. We understand that much of the content of the communications will be confidential and will include, but not be limited to, the relationship of proposed project details to Native American Cultural Historic Properties, such as burial sites, known or unknown, architectural features and artifacts, ceremonial sites, sacred shrines, and cultural landscapes. The proposed project is located in a non -sectioned portion of Township 8 South, Range 2 West, San Bernardino Baseline and Meridian. The property is depicted on the Temecula (1975), and Pechanga (1997) California 7.5 -minute USGS topographic quadrangles, (see attached map). The lead agency is the City of Temecula. If you know of any cultural resources in the vicinity that may be of religious and/or cultural significance to your community or if you would like more information, please contact me at 909-525-7078 or david.brunzell@yahoo.com. Correspondence can also be sent to BCR Consulting LLC, Attn: David Brunzell, 1420 Guadalajara Place, Claremont, California 91711. I request a response by October 20, 2016. If you require more time, please let me know. Thank you for your involvement in this process. Sincerely, BCR Consulting LLC David Brunzell, M.A./RPA Principal Investigator/Archaeologist Attachment: USGS Map BCRCONSULTING LLC ARCHAEOLOGY HISTORIC PRESERVATION PALEONTOLOGY GIS www.bcrconsulting.net 909.525 7078aCI ,e°^' ,a September 16, 2016 Robert Pinto Sr. Chairperson Ewiiaapaayp Tribal Office 4054 Willows Road Alpine, California 91901 Subject: Tribal Scoping for the Pechanga Parkway Widening Project, Temecula, Riverside County, California Dear Mr. Chairperson: This is a tribal scoping letter to solicit your comments on a proposed development project at locations with which you have tribal cultural affiliation. The purpose of the tribal scoping is to ensure the protection of Native American cultural resources on which the proposed undertaking may have an impact. In the tribal scoping process, early communication is encouraged in order to provide for full and reasonable public input from Native American groups and individuals. We understand that much of the content of the communications will be confidential and will include, but not be limited to, the relationship of proposed project details to Native American Cultural Historic Properties, such as burial sites, known or unknown, architectural features and artifacts, ceremonial sites, sacred shrines, and cultural landscapes. The proposed project is located in a non -sectioned portion of Township 8 South, Range 2 West, San Bernardino Baseline and Meridian. The property is depicted on the Temecula (1975), and Pechanga (1997) California 7.5 -minute USGS topographic quadrangles, (see attached map). The lead agency is the City of Temecula. If you know of any cultural resources in the vicinity that may be of religious and/or cultural significance to your community or if you would like more information, please contact me at 909-525-7078 or david.brunzell@yahoo.com. Correspondence can also be sent to BCR Consulting LLC, Attn: David Brunzell, 1420 Guadalajara Place, Claremont, California 91711. I request a response by October 20, 2016. If you require more time, please let me know. Thank you for your involvement in this process. Sincerely, BCR Consulting LLC David Brunzell, M.A./RPA Principal Investigator/Archaeologist Attachment: USGS Map www.bcrconsulting.net C1feflOn1 BCRCONSULTING LLC ARCHAEOLOGY HISTORIC PRESERVATION PALEONTOLOGY GIS909.525.7078 TT,,,, September 16, 2016 Angela Elliot Santos Chairperson Manzanita Band of Kumeyaay Nation P.O. Box 1302 Boulevard, California 91905 Subject: Tribal Scoping for the Pechanga Parkway Widening Project, Temecula, Riverside County, California Dear Ms. Chairperson: This is a tribal scoping letter to solicit your comments on a proposed development project at locations with which you have tribal cultural affiliation. The purpose of the tribal scoping is to ensure the protection of Native American cultural resources on which the proposed undertaking may have an impact. In the tribal scoping process, early communication is encouraged in order to provide for full and reasonable public input from Native American groups and individuals. We understand that much of the content of the communications will be confidential and will include, but not be limited to, the relationship of proposed project details to Native American Cultural Historic Properties, such as burial sites, known or unknown, architectural features and artifacts, ceremonial sites, sacred shrines, and cultural landscapes. The proposed project is located in a non -sectioned portion of Township 8 South, Range 2 West, San Bernardino Baseline and Meridian. The property is depicted on the Temecula (1975), and Pechanga (1997) California 7.5 -minute USGS topographic quadrangles, (see attached map). The lead agency is the City of Temecula. If you know of any cultural resources in the vicinity that may be of religious and/or cultural significance to your community or if you would like more information, please contact me at 909-525-7078 or david.brunzell@yahoo.com. Correspondence can also be sent to BCR Consulting LLC, Attn: David Brunzell, 1420 Guadalajara Place, Claremont, California 91711. I request a response by October 20, 2016. If you require more time, please let me know. Thank you for your involvement in this process. Sincerely, BCR Consulting LLC David Brunzell, M.A./RPA Principal Investigator/Archaeologist Attachment: USGS Map www.bcrconsutting. net CiaromoM BCRCONSULTING LLC ARCHAEOLOGY HISTORIC PRESERVATION PALEONTOLOGY GIS 909.525.7078 ate, September 16, 2016 Erica Pinto Chairperson Jamul Indian Reservation P.O. Box 612 Jamul, California 91935 Subject: Tribal Scoping for the Pechanga Parkway Widening Project, Temecula, Riverside County, California Dear Ms. Chairperson: This is a tribal scoping letter to solicit your comments on a proposed development project at locations with which you have tribal cultural affiliation. The purpose of the tribal scoping is to ensure the protection of Native American cultural resources on which the proposed undertaking may have an impact. In the tribal scoping process, early communication is encouraged in order to provide for full and reasonable public input from Native American groups and individuals. We understand that much of the content of the communications will be confidential and will include, but not be limited to, the relationship of proposed project details to Native American Cultural Historic Properties, such as burial sites, known or unknown, architectural features and artifacts, ceremonial sites, sacred shrines, and cultural landscapes. The proposed project is located in a non -sectioned portion of Township 8 South, Range 2 West, San Bernardino Baseline and Meridian. The property is depicted on the Temecula (1975), and Pechanga (1997) California 7.5 -minute USGS topographic quadrangles, (see attached map). The lead agency is the City of Temecula. If you know of any cultural resources in the vicinity that may be of religious and/or cultural significance to your community or if you would like more information, please contact me at 909-525-7078 or david.brunzell@yahoo.com. Correspondence can also be sent to BCR Consulting LLC, Attn: David Brunzell, 1420 Guadalajara Place, Claremont, California 91711. I request a response by October 20, 2016. If you require more time, please let me know. Thank you for your involvement in this process. Sincerely, BCR Consulting LLC David Brunzell, M.A./RPA Principal Investigator/Archaeologist Attachment: USGS Map www.bcrconsulting.net C"'""'°"' BCRCONSULTING LLC ARCHAEOLOGY HISTORIC PRESERVATION PALEONTOLOGY GIS 909 525.7078 e"x,,,,, September 16, 2016 Virgil Oyos Chairperson Morongo Band of Mission Indians P.O. Box 270 Santa Ysabel, California 92070 Subject: Tribal Scoping for the Pechanga Parkway Widening Project, Temecula, Riverside County, California Dear Mr. Chairperson: This is a tribal scoping letter to solicit your comments on a proposed development project at locations with which you have tribal cultural affiliation. The purpose of the tribal scoping is to ensure the protection of Native American cultural resources on which the proposed undertaking may have an impact. In the tribal scoping process, early communication is encouraged in order to provide for full and reasonable public input from Native American groups and individuals. We understand that much of the content of the communications will be confidential and will include, but not be limited to, the relationship of proposed project details to Native American Cultural Historic Properties, such as burial sites, known or unknown, architectural features and artifacts, ceremonial sites, sacred shrines, and cultural landscapes. The proposed project is located in a non -sectioned portion of Township 8 South, Range 2 West, San Bernardino Baseline and Meridian. The property is depicted on the Temecula (1975), and Pechanga (1997) California 7.5 -minute USGS topographic quadrangles, (see attached map). The lead agency is the City of Temecula. If you know of any cultural resources in the vicinity that may be of religious and/or cultural significance to your community or if you would like more information, please contact me at 909-525-7078 or david.brunzell@yahoo.com. Correspondence can also be sent to BCR Consulting LLC, Attn: David Brunzell, 1420 Guadalajara Place, Claremont, California 91711. I request a response by October 20, 2016. If you require more time, please let me know. Thank you for your involvement in this process. Sincerely, BCR Consulting LLC David Brunzell, M.A./RPA Principal Investigator/Archaeologist Attachment: USGS Map www.bcrconsulting.net N' a" BC RCONSULTING LLC ARCHAEOLOGY HISTORIC PRESERVATION PALEONTOLOGY GIS 909.525.7078 =hap September 16, 2016 Mark Macarro Chairperson Pechanga Band of Mission Indians P.O. Box 1477 Temecula, California 92593 Subject: Tribal Scoping for the Pechanga Parkway Widening Project, Temecula, Riverside County, California Dear Mr. Chairperson: This is a tribal scoping letter to solicit your comments on a proposed development project at locations with which you have tribal cultural affiliation. The purpose of the tribal scoping is to ensure the protection of Native American cultural resources on which the proposed undertaking may have an impact. In the tribal scoping process, early communication is encouraged in order to provide for full and reasonable public input from Native American groups and individuals. We understand that much of the content of the communications will be confidential and will include, but not be limited to, the relationship of proposed project details to Native American Cultural Historic Properties, such as burial sites, known or unknown, architectural features and artifacts, ceremonial sites, sacred shrines, and cultural landscapes. The proposed project is located in a non -sectioned portion of Township 8 South, Range 2 West, San Bernardino Baseline and Meridian. The property is depicted on the Temecula (1975), and Pechanga (1997) California 7.5 -minute USGS topographic quadrangles, (see attached map). The lead agency is the City of Temecula. If you know of any cultural resources in the vicinity that may be of religious and/or cultural significance to your community or if you would like more information, please contact me at 909-525-7078 or david.brunzell@yahoo.com. Correspondence can also be sent to BCR Consulting LLC, Attn: David Brunzell, 1420 Guadalajara Place, Claremont, California 91711. I request a response by October 20, 2016. If you require more time, please let me know. Thank you for your involvement in this process. Sincerely, BCR Consulting LLC David Brunzell, M.A./RPA Principal Investigator/Archaeologist Attachment: USGS Map www.bcrconsulting.net c"'°'"°"' BCRCONSULTING LLC ARCHAEOLOGY HISTORIC PRESERVATION PALEONTOLOGY GIS 909.525.7078"re°p,°x,,,,, September 16, 2016 Shasta Gaughen Historic Preservation Office Pala Band of Mission Indians 35008 Pala Temecula Road, PMB Pala, California 92059 Subject: Tribal Scoping for the Pechanga Parkway Widening Project, Temecula, Riverside County, California Dear Shasta: This is a tribal scoping letter to solicit your comments on a proposed development project at locations with which you have tribal cultural affiliation. The purpose of the tribal scoping is to ensure the protection of Native American cultural resources on which the proposed undertaking may have an impact. In the tribal scoping process, early communication is encouraged in order to provide for full and reasonable public input from Native American groups and individuals. We understand that much of the content of the communications will be confidential and will include, but not be limited to, the relationship of proposed project details to Native American Cultural Historic Properties, such as burial sites, known or unknown, architectural features and artifacts, ceremonial sites, sacred shrines, and cultural landscapes. The proposed project is located in a non -sectioned portion of Township 8 South, Range 2 West, San Bernardino Baseline and Meridian. The property is depicted on the Temecula (1975), and Pechanga (1997) California 7.5 -minute USGS topographic quadrangles, (see attached map). The lead agency is the City of Temecula. If you know of any cultural resources in the vicinity that may be of religious and/or cultural significance to your community or if you would like more information, please contact me at 909-525-7078 or david.brunzell@yahoo.com. Correspondence can also be sent to BCR Consulting LLC, Attn: David Brunzell, 1420 Guadalajara Place, Claremont, California 91711. I request a response by October 20, 2016. If you require more time, please let me know. Thank you for your involvement in this process. Sincerely, BCR Consulting LLC David Brunzell, M.A./RPA Principal Investigator/Archaeologist Attachment: USGS Map www. bcrconsulting BCRCONSULTING LLC ARCHAEOLOGY HISTORIC PRESERVATION PALEONTOLOGY GIS 909.525.7078N, September 16, 2016 Bo Mazzetti Chairperson Rincon Band of Mission Indians 1 West Tribal Road Valley Center, California 92082 Subject: Tribal Scoping for the Pechanga Parkway Widening Project, Temecula, Riverside County, California Dear Mr. Chairperson: This is a tribal scoping letter to solicit your comments on a proposed development project at locations with which you have tribal cultural affiliation. The purpose of the tribal scoping is to ensure the protection of Native American cultural resources on which the proposed undertaking may have an impact. In the tribal scoping process, early communication is encouraged in order to provide for full and reasonable public input from Native American groups and individuals. We understand that much of the content of the communications will be confidential and will include, but not be limited to, the relationship of proposed project details to Native American Cultural Historic Properties, such as burial sites, known or unknown, architectural features and artifacts, ceremonial sites, sacred shrines, and cultural landscapes. The proposed project is located in a non -sectioned portion of Township 8 South, Range 2 West, San Bernardino Baseline and Meridian. The property is depicted on the Temecula (1975), and Pechanga (1997) California 7.5 -minute USGS topographic quadrangles, (see attached map). The lead agency is the City of Temecula. If you know of any cultural resources in the vicinity that may be of religious and/or cultural significance to your community or if you would like more information, please contact me at 909-525-7078 or david.brunzell@yahoo.com. Correspondence can also be sent to BCR Consulting LLC, Attn: David Brunzell, 1420 Guadalajara Place, Claremont, California 91711. I request a response by October 20, 2016. If you require more time, please let me know. Thank you for your involvement in this process. Sincerely, BCR Consulting LLC David Brunzell, M.A./RPA Principal Investigator/Archaeologist Attachment: USGS Map www.bcrconsulting.net OOt BCRCONSULTING LLC ARCHAEOLOGY HISTORIC PRESERVATION PALEONTOLOGY GIS 909.525.707411w, September 16, 2016 Temet Aguilar Chairperson Pauma & Yuima Reservation P.O. Box 369 Pauma Valley, California 92061 Subject: Tribal Scoping for the Pechanga Parkway Widening Project, Temecula, Riverside County, California Dear Mr. Chairperson: This is a tribal scoping letter to solicit your comments on a proposed development project at locations with which you have tribal cultural affiliation. The purpose of the tribal scoping is to ensure the protection of Native American cultural resources on which the proposed undertaking may have an impact. In the tribal scoping process, early communication is encouraged in order to provide for full and reasonable public input from Native American groups and individuals. We understand that much of the content of the communications will be confidential and will include, but not be limited to, the relationship of proposed project details to Native American Cultural Historic Properties, such as burial sites, known or unknown, architectural features and artifacts, ceremonial sites, sacred shrines, and cultural landscapes. The proposed project is located in a non -sectioned portion of Township 8 South, Range 2 West, San Bernardino Baseline and Meridian. The property is depicted on the Temecula (1975), and Pechanga (1997) California 7.5 -minute USGS topographic quadrangles, (see attached map). The lead agency is the City of Temecula. If you know of any cultural resources in the vicinity that may be of religious and/or cultural significance to your community or if you would like more information, please contact me at 909-525-7078 or david.brunzell@yahoo.com. Correspondence can also be sent to BCR Consulting LLC, Attn: David Brunzell, 1420 Guadalajara Place, Claremont, California 91711. I request a response by October 20, 2016. If you require more time, please let me know. Thank you for your involvement in this process. Sincerely, BCR Consulting LLC David Brunzell, M.A./RPA Principal Investigator/Archaeologist Attachment: USGS Map BC RCONSULTING LLC ARCHAEOLOGY HISTORIC PRESERVATION PALEONTOLOGY GIS September 16, 2016 Jim McPherson Tribal Historic Preservation Officer Rincon Band of Mission Indians 1 West Tribal Road Valley Center, California 92082 www.bcrconsulting.net C"'"°°' 909.525.7078 , Subject: Tribal Scoping for the Pechanga Parkway Widening Project, Temecula, Riverside County, California Dear Jim: This is a tribal scoping letter to solicit your comments on a proposed development project at locations with which you have tribal cultural affiliation. The purpose of the tribal scoping is to ensure the protection of Native American cultural resources on which the proposed undertaking may have an impact. In the tribal scoping process, early communication is encouraged in order to provide for full and reasonable public input from Native American groups and individuals. We understand that much of the content of the communications will be confidential and will include, but not be limited to, the relationship of proposed project details to Native American Cultural Historic Properties, such as burial sites, known or unknown, architectural features and artifacts, ceremonial sites, sacred shrines, and cultural landscapes. The proposed project is located in a non -sectioned portion of Township 8 South, Range 2 West, San Bernardino Baseline and Meridian. The property is depicted on the Temecula (1975), and Pechanga (1997) California 7.5 -minute USGS topographic quadrangles, (see attached map). The lead agency is the City of Temecula. If you know of any cultural resources in the vicinity that may be of religious and/or cultural significance to your community or if you would like more information, please contact me at 909-525-7078 or david.brunzell@yahoo.com. Correspondence can also be sent to BCR Consulting LLC, Attn: David Brunzell, 1420 Guadalajara Place, Claremont, California 91711. I request a response by October 20, 2016. If you require more time, please let me know. Thank you for your involvement in this process. Sincerely, BCR Consulting LLC David Brunzell, M.A./RPA Principal Investigator/Archaeologist Attachment: USGS Map BCRCONSULI ING LLC ARCHAEOLOGY HISTORIC PRESERVATION PALEONTOLOGY GIS September 16, 2016 Paul Macarro Cultural Resources Manager Pechanga Band of Mission Indians P.O Box 1477 Temecula, California 92593 www.bcrconsulting.net Cv'°'"°"' 909.525.7078 TT ,p, Subject: Tribal Scoping for the Pechanga Parkway Widening Project, Temecula, Riverside County, California Dear Paul: This is a tribal scoping letter to solicit your comments on a proposed development project at locations with which you have tribal cultural affiliation. The purpose of the tribal scoping is to ensure the protection of Native American cultural resources on which the proposed undertaking may have an impact. In the tribal scoping process, early communication is encouraged in order to provide for full and reasonable public input from Native American groups and individuals. We understand that much of the content of the communications will be confidential and will include, but not be limited to, the relationship of proposed project details to Native American Cultural Historic Properties, such as burial sites, known or unknown, architectural features and artifacts, ceremonial sites, sacred shrines, and cultural landscapes. The proposed project is located in a non -sectioned portion of Township 8 South, Range 2 West, San Bernardino Baseline and Meridian. The property is depicted on the Temecula (1975), and Pechanga (1997) California 7.5 -minute USGS topographic quadrangles, (see attached map). The lead agency is the City of Temecula. If you know of any cultural resources in the vicinity that may be of religious and/or cultural significance to your community or if you would like more information, please contact me at 909-525-7078 or david.brunzell@yahoo.com. Correspondence can also be sent to BCR Consulting LLC, Attn: David Brunzell, 1420 Guadalajara Place, Claremont, California 91711. I request a response by October 20, 2016. If you require more time, please let me know. Thank you for your involvement in this process. Sincerely, BCR Consulting LLC David Brunzell, M.A./RPA Principal Investigator/Archaeologist Attachment: USGS Map www.bcrconsulting.net c'are^ont BC RCON SU LTI NG LLC ARCHAEOLOGY HISTORIC PRESERVATION PALEONTOLOGY GIS 909.525.7078 rehathap September 16, 2016 Tribal Council San Luis Rey Band of Mission Indians 1889 Sunset Drive Vista, California 92081 Subject: Tribal Scoping for the Pechanga Parkway Widening Project, Temecula, Riverside County, California Dear Tribal Council: This is a tribal scoping letter to solicit your comments on a proposed development project at locations with which you have tribal cultural affiliation. The purpose of the tribal scoping is to ensure the protection of Native American cultural resources on which the proposed undertaking may have an impact. In the tribal scoping process, early communication is encouraged in order to provide for full and reasonable public input from Native American groups and individuals. We understand that much of the content of the communications will be confidential and will include, but not be limited to, the relationship of proposed project details to Native American Cultural Historic Properties, such as burial sites, known or unknown, architectural features and artifacts, ceremonial sites, sacred shrines, and cultural landscapes. The proposed project is located in a non -sectioned portion of Township 8 South, Range 2 West, San Bernardino Baseline and Meridian. The property is depicted on the Temecula (1975), and Pechanga (1997) California 7.5 -minute USGS topographic quadrangles, (see attached map). The lead agency is the City of Temecula. If you know of any cultural resources in the vicinity that may be of religious and/or cultural significance to your community or if you would like more information, please contact me at 909-525-7078 or david.brunzell@yahoo.com. Correspondence can also be sent to BCR Consulting LLC, Attn: David Brunzell, 1420 Guadalajara Place, Claremont, California 91711. request a response by October 20, 2016. If you require more time, please let me know. Thank you for your involvement in this process. Sincerely, BCR Consulting LLC David Brunzell, M.A./RPA Principal Investigator/Archaeologist Attachment: USGS Map BCRCONSULTING LLC ARCHAEOLOGY HISTORIC PRESERVATION PALEONTOLOGY GIS September 16, 2016 Anna Hoover Cultural Analyst Pechanga Cultural Resources Department P.O. Box 2183 Temecula, California 92593 www.bcrconsulting.net c"'a" 909.525.7078 TanaC,aD4 Subject: Tribal Scoping for the Pechanga Parkway Widening Project, Temecula, Riverside County, California Dear Anna: This is a tribal scoping letter to solicit your comments on a proposed development project at locations with which you have tribal cultural affiliation. The purpose of the tribal scoping is to ensure the protection of Native American cultural resources on which the proposed undertaking may have an impact. In the tribal scoping process, early communication is encouraged in order to provide for full and reasonable public input from Native American groups and individuals. We understand that much of the content of the communications will be confidential and will include, but not be limited to, the relationship of proposed project details to Native American Cultural Historic Properties, such as burial sites, known or unknown, architectural features and artifacts, ceremonial sites, sacred shrines, and cultural landscapes. The proposed project is located in a non -sectioned portion of Township 8 South, Range 2 West, San Bernardino Baseline and Meridian. The property is depicted on the Temecula (1975), and Pechanga (1997) California 7.5 -minute USGS topographic quadrangles, (see attached map). The lead agency is the City of Temecula. If you know of any cultural resources in the vicinity that may be of religious and/or cultural significance to your community or if you would like more information, please contact me at 909-525-7078 or david.brunzell@yahoo.com. Correspondence can also be sent to BCR Consulting LLC, Attn: David Brunzell, 1420 Guadalajara Place, Claremont, California 91711. I request a response by October 20, 2016. If you require more time, please let me know. Thank you for your involvement in this process. Sincerely, BCR Consulting LLC David Brunzell, M.A./RPA Principal Investigator/Archaeologist Attachment: USGS Map BCRCONSULI ING LLC ARCHAEOLOGY HISTORIC PRESERVATION PALEONTOLOGY GIS September 16, 2016 Allen E. Lawson Chairperson San Pasqua) Band of Mission Indians P.O. Box 365 Valley Center, California 92082 www.bcrconsulting.net c"'e"°"' 909.525.7078 TMichap, Subject: Tribal Scoping for the Pechanga Parkway Widening Project, Temecula, Riverside County, California Dear Mr. Chairperson: This is a tribal scoping letter to solicit your comments on a proposed development project at locations with which you have tribal cultural affiliation. The purpose of the tribal scoping is to ensure the protection of Native American cultural resources on which the proposed undertaking may have an impact. In the tribal scoping process, early communication is encouraged in order to provide for full and reasonable public input from Native American groups and individuals. We understand that much of the content of the communications will be confidential and will include, but not be limited to, the relationship of proposed project details to Native American Cultural Historic Properties, such as burial sites, known or unknown, architectural features and artifacts, ceremonial sites, sacred shrines, and cultural landscapes. The proposed project is located in a non -sectioned portion of Township 8 South, Range 2 West, San Bernardino Baseline and Meridian. The property is depicted on the Temecula (1975), and Pechanga (1997) California 7.5 -minute USGS topographic quadrangles, (see attached map). The lead agency is the City of Temecula. If you know of any cultural resources in the vicinity that may be of religious and/or cultural significance to your community or if you would like more information, please contact me at 909-525-7078 or david.brunzell@yahoo.com. Correspondence can also be sent to BCR Consulting LLC, Attn: David Brunzell, 1420 Guadalajara Place, Claremont, California 91711. I request a response by October 20, 2016. If you require more time, please let me know. Thank you for your involvement in this process. Sincerely, BCR Consulting LLC David Brunzell, M.A./RPA Principal Investigator/Archaeologist Attachment: USGS Map BC RCONSULTING LLC ARCHAEOLOGY HISTORIC PRESERVATION PALEONTOLOGY GIS September 16, 2016 John Flores Environmental Coordinator San Pasqua) Band of Mission Indians P.O. Box 365 Valley Center, California 92082 www.bcrconsulting.net Icurmnom 909.525.7078 t.n cnam Subject: Tribal Scoping for the Pechanga Parkway Widening Project, Temecula, Riverside County, California Dear John: This is a tribal scoping letter to solicit your comments on a proposed development project at locations with which you have tribal cultural affiliation. The purpose of the tribal scoping is to ensure the protection of Native American cultural resources on which the proposed undertaking may have an impact. In the tribal scoping process, early communication is encouraged in order to provide for full and reasonable public input from Native American groups and individuals. We understand that much of the content of the communications will be confidential and will include, but not be limited to, the relationship of proposed project details to Native American Cultural Historic Properties, such as burial sites, known or unknown, architectural features and artifacts, ceremonial sites, sacred shrines, and cultural landscapes. The proposed project is located in a non -sectioned portion of Township 8 South, Range 2 West, San Bernardino Baseline and Meridian. The property is depicted on the Temecula (1975), and Pechanga (1997) California 7.5 -minute USGS topographic quadrangles, (see attached map). The lead agency is the City of Temecula. If you know of any cultural resources in the vicinity that may be of religious and/or cultural significance to your community or if you would like more information, please contact me at 909-525-7078 or david.brunzell@yahoo.com. Correspondence can also be sent to BCR Consulting LLC, Attn: David Brunzell, 1420 Guadalajara Place, Claremont, California 91711. I request a response by October 20, 2016. If you require more time, please let me know. Thank you for your involvement in this process. Sincerely, BCR Consulting LLC David Brunzell, M.A./RPA Principal Investigator/Archaeologist Attachment: USGS Map BC RCONSULTING LLC ARCHAEOLOGY HISTORIC PRESERVATION PALEONTOLOGY GIS www.bcrconsutting.net Claremont 909.525.7078 a. September 16, 2016 Robert J. Welch Chairperson Viejas Band of Kumeyaay Indians 1 Viejas Grade Road Alpine, California 91901 Subject: Tribal Scoping for the Pechanga Parkway Widening Project, Temecula, Riverside County, California Dear Mr. Chairperson: This is a tribal scoping letter to solicit your comments on a proposed development project at locations with which you have tribal cultural affiliation. The purpose of the tribal scoping is to ensure the protection of Native American cultural resources on which the proposed undertaking may have an impact. In the tribal scoping process, early communication is encouraged in order to provide for full and reasonable public input from Native American groups and individuals. We understand that much of the content of the communications will be confidential and will include, but not be limited to, the relationship of proposed project details to Native American Cultural Historic Properties, such as burial sites, known or unknown, architectural features and artifacts, ceremonial sites, sacred shrines, and cultural landscapes. The proposed project is located in a non -sectioned portion of Township 8 South, Range 2 West, San Bernardino Baseline and Meridian. The property is depicted on the Temecula (1975), and Pechanga (1997) California 7.5 -minute USGS topographic quadrangles, (see attached map). The lead agency is the City of Temecula. If you know of any cultural resources in the vicinity that may be of religious and/or cultural significance to your community or if you would like more information, please contact me at 909-525-7078 or david.brunzell@yahoo.com. Correspondence can also be sent to BCR Consulting LLC, Attn: David Brunzell, 1420 Guadalajara Place, Claremont, California 91711. I request a response by October 20, 2016. If you require more time, please let me know. Thank you for your involvement in this process. Sincerely, BCR Consulting LLC David Brunzell, M.A./RPA Principal Investigator/Archaeologist Attachment: USGS Map BCRCONSULTING LLC ARCHAEOLOGY HISTORIC PRESERVATION PALEONTOLOGY GIS www.bcrconsufting.net Ca,n°"' 909.525.7078?ee,"'P.a„. September 16, 2016 Joseph Ontiveros Cultural Resources Department Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians P.O. Box 487 San Jacinto, California 92581 Subject: Tribal Scoping for the Pechanga Parkway Widening Project, Temecula, Riverside County, California Dear Joseph: This is a tribal scoping letter to solicit your comments on a proposed development project at locations with which you have tribal cultural affiliation. The purpose of the tribal scoping is to ensure the protection of Native American cultural resources on which the proposed undertaking may have an impact. In the tribal scoping process, early communication is encouraged in order to provide for full and reasonable public input from Native American groups and individuals. We understand that much of the content of the communications will be confidential and will include, but not be limited to, the relationship of proposed project details to Native American Cultural Historic Properties, such as burial sites, known or unknown, architectural features and artifacts, ceremonial sites, sacred shrines, and cultural landscapes. The proposed project is located in a non -sectioned portion of Township 8 South, Range 2 West, San Bernardino Baseline and Meridian. The property is depicted on the Temecula (1975), and Pechanga (1997) California 7.5 -minute USGS topographic quadrangles, (see attached map). The lead agency is the City of Temecula. If you know of any cultural resources in the vicinity that may be of religious and/or cultural significance to your community or if you would like more information, please contact me at 909-525-7078 or david.brunzell@yahoo.com. Correspondence can also be sent to BCR Consulting LLC, Attn: David Brunzell, 1420 Guadalajara Place, Claremont, California 91711. I request a response by October 20, 2016. If you require more time, please let me know. Thank you for your involvement in this process. Sincerely, BCR Consulting LLC David Brunzell, M.A./RPA Principal Investigator/Archaeologist Attachment: USGS Map www.bcrconsufting.net c'"°"'°"' BCRCONSULTING LLC ARCHAEOLOGY HISTORIC PRESERVATION PALEONTOLOGY GIS 909525.7078"c ,o, September 16, 2016 Julie Hagen Viejas Band of Kumeyaay Indians 1 Viejas Grade Road Alpine, California 91901 Subject: Tribal Scoping for the Pechanga Parkway Widening Project, Temecula, Riverside County, California Dear Julie: This is a tribal scoping letter to solicit your comments on a proposed development project at locations with which you have tribal cultural affiliation. The purpose of the tribal scoping is to ensure the protection of Native American cultural resources on which the proposed undertaking may have an impact. In the tribal scoping process, early communication is encouraged in order to provide for full and reasonable public input from Native American groups and individuals. We understand that much of the content of the communications will be confidential and will include, but not be limited to, the relationship of proposed project details to Native American Cultural Historic Properties, such as burial sites, known or unknown, architectural features and artifacts, ceremonial sites, sacred shrines, and cultural landscapes. The proposed project is located in a non -sectioned portion of Township 8 South, Range 2 West, San Bernardino Baseline and Meridian. The property is depicted on the Temecula (1975), and Pechanga (1997) California 7.5 -minute USGS topographic quadrangles, (see attached map). The lead agency is the City of Temecula. If you know of any cultural resources in the vicinity that may be of religious and/or cultural significance to your community or if you would like more information, please contact me at 909-525-7078 or david.brunzell@yahoo.com. Correspondence can also be sent to BCR Consulting LLC, Attn: David Brunzell, 1420 Guadalajara Place, Claremont, California 91711. I request a response by October 20, 2016. If you require more time, please let me know. Thank you for your involvement in this process. Sincerely, BCR Consulting LLC David Brunzell, M.A./RPA Principal Investigator/Archaeologist Attachment: USGS Map www. bcrconsulting.net cm,em°M BC RCO N S U LTI N G LLC ARCHAEOLOGY HISTORIC PRESERVATION PALEONTOLOGY GIS909.525.7078 TNalla ehachap. September 16, 2016 Carrie Garcia Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians Cultural Resources Manager P.O. Box 487 San Jacinto, California 92581 Subject: Tribal Scoping for the Pechanga Parkway Widening Project, Temecula, Riverside County, California Dear Carrie: This is a tribal scoping letter to solicit your comments on a proposed development project at locations with which you have tribal cultural affiliation. The purpose of the tribal scoping is to ensure the protection of Native American cultural resources on which the proposed undertaking may have an impact. In the tribal scoping process, early communication is encouraged in order to provide for full and reasonable public input from Native American groups and individuals. We understand that much of the content of the communications will be confidential and will include, but not be limited to, the relationship of proposed project details to Native American Cultural Historic Properties, such as burial sites, known or unknown, architectural features and artifacts, ceremonial sites, sacred shrines, and cultural landscapes. The proposed project is located in a non -sectioned portion of Township 8 South, Range 2 West, San Bernardino Baseline and Meridian. The property is depicted on the Temecula (1975), and Pechanga (1997) California 7.5 -minute USGS topographic quadrangles, (see attached map). The lead agency is the City of Temecula. If you know of any cultural resources in the vicinity that may be of religious and/or cultural significance to your community or if you would like more information, please contact me at 909-525-7078 or david.brunzell@yahoo.com. Correspondence can also be sent to BCR Consulting LLC, Attn: David Brunzell, 1420 Guadalajara Place, Claremont, California 91711. I request a response by October 20, 2016. If you require more time, please let me know. Thank you for your involvement in this process. Sincerely, BCR Consulting LLC David Brunzell, M.A./RPA Principal Investigator/Archaeologist Attachment: USGS Map www.bcrconsulting.net c"`°'"°"' BCRCONSULTING LLC ARCHAEOLOGY HISTORIC PRESERVATION PALEONTOLOGY GIS 909.525.7078 T nap, September 16, 2016 Cody J. Martinez Chairperson Sycuan Band of the Kumeyaay Nation 1 Kwaaypaay Court El Cajon, California 92019 Subject: Tribal Scoping for the Pechanga Parkway Widening Project, Temecula, Riverside County, California Dear Mr. Chairperson: This is a tribal scoping letter to solicit your comments on a proposed development project at locations with which you have tribal cultural affiliation. The purpose of the tribal scoping is to ensure the protection of Native American cultural resources on which the proposed undertaking may have an impact. In the tribal scoping process, early communication is encouraged in order to provide for full and reasonable public input from Native American groups and individuals. We understand that much of the content of the communications will be confidential and will include, but not be limited to, the relationship of proposed project details to Native American Cultural Historic Properties, such as burial sites, known or unknown, architectural features and artifacts, ceremonial sites, sacred shrines, and cultural landscapes. The proposed project is located in a non -sectioned portion of Township 8 South, Range 2 West, San Bernardino Baseline and Meridian. The property is depicted on the Temecula (1975), and Pechanga (1997) California 7.5 -minute USGS topographic quadrangles, (see attached map). The lead agency is the City of Temecula. If you know of any cultural resources in the vicinity that may be of religious and/or cultural significance to your community or if you would like more information, please contact me at 909-525-7078 or david.brunzell@yahoo.com. Correspondence can also be sent to BCR Consulting LLC, Attn: David Brunzell, 1420 Guadalajara Place, Claremont, California 91711. I request a response by October 20, 2016. If you require more time, please let me know. Thank you for your involvement in this process. Sincerely, BCR Consulting LLC David Brunzell, M.A./RPA Principal Investigator/Archaeologist Attachment: USGS Map www.bcrconsulting.net CWremont BC RCON S U LTI NG LLC ARCHAEOLOGY HISTORIC PRESERVATION PALEONTOLOGY GIS 909.525.7078 N v, September 16, 2016 Lisa Haws Cultural Resources Manager Sycuan Band of the Kumeyaay Nation 1 Kwaaypaay Court El Cajon, California 92019 Subject: Tribal Scoping for the Pechanga Parkway Widening Project, Temecula, Riverside County, California Dear Lisa: This is a tribal scoping letter to solicit your comments on a proposed development project at locations with which you have tribal cultural affiliation. The purpose of the tribal scoping is to ensure the protection of Native American cultural resources on which the proposed undertaking may have an impact. In the tribal scoping process, early communication is encouraged in order to provide for full and reasonable public input from Native American groups and individuals. We understand that much of the content of the communications will be confidential and will include, but not be limited to, the relationship of proposed project details to Native American Cultural Historic Properties, such as burial sites, known or unknown, architectural features and artifacts, ceremonial sites, sacred shrines, and cultural landscapes. The proposed project is located in a non -sectioned portion of Township 8 South, Range 2 West, San Bernardino Baseline and Meridian. The property is depicted on the Temecula (1975), and Pechanga (1997) California 7.5 -minute USGS topographic quadrangles, (see attached map). The lead agency is the City of Temecula. If you know of any cultural resources in the vicinity that may be of religious and/or cultural significance to your community or if you would like more information, please contact me at 909-525-7078 or david.brunzell@yahoo.com. Correspondence can also be sent to BCR Consulting LLC, Attn: David Brunzell, 1420 Guadalajara Place, Claremont, California 91711. I request a response by October 20, 2016. If you require more time, please let me know. Thank you for your involvement in this process. Sincerely, BCR Consulting LLC David Brunzell, M.A./RPA Principal Investigator/Archaeologist Attachment: USGS Map ._a r- rU m t -q 3E0 Extra Samosa& Foos *segosb.., frprirpsW FirtsrR n Romp, herdo3P0 • cj 0 %Num Pim* imaircrily s kjL1 ComPoo ftwociamo Dollooty • L.jfl l=1 Ado Sam,. Roi‘bod • i.1:1 ci [3 Sorrows flomicord Dew, • CD Postage e•R 4 old Pewees and Fes. is tal Servi R FIED MAIL RECEIPT Domestic Mait (rJ 0•6116Mrd . SC;.11fl liereleee II Pees Oro eel les ternstrrilll Oftsup amon Imam. , CI Fir 4.011=0 (limbos'. $ plumose ma Rely • 1 Li u 1 1 CI sae %perm MmOr • V2.1;* a1/411-11,111,011 PortICO• $ fatal Positege led Nee _ P try& t es. Sem 7b 3OO A' :0 U.S. Postal Service' CERTIFIED MAILRECEIPT Domestic Mail Only For delivery information. vee' our website atwww.tiods. c Gerehee Mee Fos m IT' m rq e,‘ rq a - En Total liciebest end tar ; ..-13 Lm CI 'Strait( - 1-4 r•- Sri—art n 1-o4Nv IPOstrre,i, Here c 6 c,) Pt& le_& --"Nel 5 .. rllo•Zr 3800 Awl; 20'O • U.S. Postal Service CERTIFIED MAIL* RECEIPT 1711-101P '-rr Only •ttutatton. teed out webstre fl www.usps.com t GNAW Mil Am $ 7 30 :Extra Serviess irises Siesmasm estreirrfrsie 0$0.aknaki$10011o$10$110 a , Claw* nailiplis Postmark D°.noa kW Pkalaklallekkok • $:i , i..4717 -- Here D kaukallmluleftille• I 1: 10 1 Adult alardbal f•m6.11.• Elnimei • Pommies Sig F r.1 .18110, drprti 231:r ',II •,.. tor ItnqlfMr. trrrnsr r -r1 Lf) m r-9 0 ri- U S. - 0910 0001 fostinal bice' CEr IFI D /111.4 RECEIPT Dome tic Mad Only • ' 10 %Neb.:it " 31 1401, /sot,. C 11 01.1 Ern & tmlalsoiorroppillel 0 Illown Orsimoppi Prow r,amprosse,ses51TI I Do. new clot essmood cisme $ t _ Omar sererre. emeexil 6 1S(1 0/alult Wahine 11bolideled Oldvary • Amino iG.47 • 7.7 9911 '2O1 :4±, t 'Skiff U.S. Postal Service CERTIFIED MAIL?' RECEIPT Domestic Mail Only For delivery untormatton vt:Jut website Fit 114,61/1/1, USDS.COM Certified La &Mose Fees octeateek..81,..rIrrer.... Rolm Fluoulpi emacoPf) s Demurs PlooMpl hoctrunt) 0 08,11101 Nmanord Do.my • 12 Anal Simian 1■4111,811 • $ :,1 CA, 0*** elprolumfloilletat Ouliwry • Postaall, $047 Poseaser 7 7. gOvss* orPO it" No,‘ ; 4:1 PS Fortr, deude US.Postal Service CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT >omestIc Mail Only lPr delivery information. 'use ,),tr website a www kisps.com' 1 t: $ 3 . 30 111-1.1 Eon NSI Fs 661106kins 0666610166606 0661666* Ird921711114* Ckuma64041066660111 s U • 0 [laminator ilublowl Mom . s _ rin 44.66 611,6666 avoismorm. 1.0. maw 1110ary Oars* Pollee* Weer .1") \\,itiftY S641 r° 6 V-)44•JI1 PrL gt911 A./ PS POITTI 3800, Apr0 201 _o r-9 tt') m rR Cr" Cr r3 0 0 0 r4 0� r-1 m ra 0910 0001 9913 .A rR 111 r-7 is) m ra a 0' I Y y'. Extra 4mvio..&Fen Os* asell tYap r. I-4 ❑Rtran snop ower.oMA I p Meow essressesteemry $ $11 t ill O pnr.erereatraaae $ $I t .1.10 [pool %mom anima amp" Poems ll . Y _. Domes/a: tal Service IED MAIL RECEIPT Id tr a• Netts" J . r 4V on odeaaw.4.6.aFess MEd ala. Waft Terap ralll DRr`uettrrR Illrueet.l P.,,al tteoab+ Nlecincb1 $ 4+: OCvlare tea t;..a.ril.I V $ �iJ _LIU 1.1 ❑Asa 01/trlae1r. $ frrt.(l0t ❑ Aat � r♦aa errrlord OrmeI l Postage Total Prey. teed $ 7b .77 et a Pb Form U.S. Postal Service'" CERTIFIED MAIL' RECEIPT Domestic Mail Only '11Orrnr tlrnr. v .r 1d C. L1.11 Fee fxtrs seri... a Fess peek aea arare terpairiat °Ram taatietapt • Dnrmlr.e4tMrctlsorld $ $ t.(t�! Darrleetae.er.weDeems $ $ti.ili1 ❑ASitgertat+Realm $ 4%r_0i+ DOOM .lorretrrw.rttr.y $ Poway slid Pagano, no, $ Poatrnart Mete 4'09/16/20)o Sent Ib bar ►- P ..... AlNI. 7RUir. Aunt U.S. Postal Service"' CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT Domestic Mali Only •" • I t l Fttllf.: r 5015 For 10uvf"r• nr1OrpanOo. vIS 1011r Wt'.Clski Orr' C.srtitbd Mail F Total Fos$., oat trip -7. ..0 i N Peseree Her. Sent To e obi "Ind Arif • PS i-ur't. 34101. A(,rr;I . •,'. ,itle NfvPr4P 40 In-ti"I{. InrrsC r-1 to m ra 0- 0 ra C7 0 r -i 0• r3 0 0910 0001 9913 5161 U.S. ost Ser ice E IF D AIL'RECEIPT Domestic Mad Only -Jr deaf „,ry int r '/'1tawl iSlt o 'woe:ide°ln itttI isms __op; 3 $1-1 iiii Pick 04 ii v2r txtr$ &artiest & Fa& tlaa..$s wicolt ly j.ar Nr ...10Iaaroo010 $ Rain I $1.. li-° -.I 0tarel.rtr.aartorataloa $ VI.tlll Dawmart•lr.a.► . $I--UU Cleat agreses.411.0ast.w.«v $ 3 total Postage and .-. $ Seri To w t 3ireet -• Flo.,-• 1 'F6oir iq, . ..... - 4.. 2, 4 r'r-. Farm 3000, April 201', °-t >53a..,o.:.laoo so ' See Reverse 1o1 Instructlons U.S. Postal Service'" CERTIFIED MAIL' RECEIPT Domestic Mail Only o delivery intorrn0ulon_ �.1 out wetstlw psr e at ww.us-pon Ceeredtied Fes $7. ^I, $ 41l 1111 _ Postmark H't� _ - a',. . G Edna $111MO..8. F«it 4s, NOM* It or El Wain AMMO tnaraagA $ QBaum erri.t hl.a.aaia► . $-ii, 00 DCrtnrra.reraredasims. $ alJ 1:11,1 [Iseult 31graliai"'$l $ $1..",00 0Ala$1310trrr.twa+aaet>.u.,.ri $ klitaga #. total Postage and tees .. II -� Sent To4 ,ti Strew iii r3kiii.) PV go%rqii .N- F, ( 2 t.r .. ._.- PS PS Furm 3000. April 2011,,,,,t4 -r,:tr wn 4..1 U.S. Postal Service"" CERTIFIED MAIL' RECEIPT Domestic Mail Only F d.t"!Cr y rntot mat ,cot onr wetlsile at W Nos" los $3.30 Erne Sonless I Fe.. Pro $44, ora Ram ao*Italloaa$ 0 Paean lroap Itarwrl I ❑ CaW.d W eratlera Dawe $ ❑ Adult seers llra.a.e $1. 41.) Liu $11.00 ❑ mat etotowttiartre>aearay $ Postage $ 0 . 4 r twa4Pata.e " Sem To t A 5esif:- 7�2im -v- 0b ( 7016 0910 0001 9913 carR 0910 0001 9913 Fo nthrt on. .n out webs.i. IttiVW 7•". Cirtlfr $ - Of' ifir.4oss & Fent Ono en. one no TTPdadfodd 011onem nocalei waned — 011nom dm. domande) 00orlInd alooldelod or/ j dont dignoado denabod $ cp) Dios domerlonal Dann $ Pkware• $e,47 LI Posing awl - $ Pc-amark rere .11e -ontrafil,6 Sara 4,41 ALLC4-4,1"il tiefVf.er --WSW " V" _C) • q-1 21#4-4b- +., PS F.,113800 U.S. Postal Service CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT Domestic Mail Only L USE . • • -taints Ili1OrMIlt1011 swill Ow w.herre 4t www t4 con' NOW hid Fri $ tib ni! Ixba Undoes &Fan 801111diod Nit $ giallefflrek* 011nama domadal $81100800 °Raw* Awar Islownwha L. Corn./ dmildat Dabswy $ Osaka soma amino • MLR Aliprimi Pmts.* $0.47 Li Pawleys awl V;aga 77 0735 (lc Hos Sent -69 'Sawa and FA, aev-t--ef- C44 • n 38U0, AphZ . U.S. Postal Service' CERTIFIED MAIL" RECEIPT Domestic Mad Only Fur Otorv.-!,y mformafron, visit our wetante al www OSP' VA Y lOwilaid Fee - ti• Lift -Erna Sonnase 4 Few NAM MK, WO Poo geopiipeadim IOWA, FlosIO IhNolec01/ $ i.LrJ Ogren Ronda folmenond $ Oc.riefte moo doosiond Donny $ $0 0i) Ado Somas,' liouged 5 (, DA.* Spnoturo Rodoldiod galloon $ PO011e• D ru u1 u-1 r-9 ru Lr) m rR 0- r1 D D r -R D ru r - Er D D D r-1 D LJ ewt .0 0 =1:11= , ,4"t, .reftedM Fee Ltra Swaim $ Feel Idea* bow. •dt, API 41/1PrIF0,04 Dreoutereeeleilieeleope 3 Return F.. .mpt Opel' Ow . . GAMOW '.1aR Rsork,-.1 Delon $ AdO Spool.. Rooked 1 rici 0 Adult dootaware fiewleteeDerreiry 6 'amuse , -7 Peolmos and ern _ _ Postmer, Here o • arerb 4,144-6- 60-(11‘w 0 f144 r 0 .0I5 1.-E,N Nev. he U.S Postal Service - CERTIFIED MAIL" RECEIPT Domestic MafOM) For drilwere info, - ot or wel-isW fr • f -t L Certified Mail F.. $3.30 E**Tl SIMMS FOURIOMokiset. Wefts Trfartfrittj Ei Wei= neelpi taidonad 0 Plokoedlend dindanid $ Sti • LIt• 0 Coilind linelond Oadony $ fifl a1en/m8lanolowdeldne 8 $1 PO OIuri.jInavory ,nstass Total Powlase awl Piro 77 eor71Th .;`trast aript. No., 7,Z r USE 07r 06 • TION&P.31.? ror Instrin Otitis U.S. Postal Service CERTIFIED MAIL- RECEIPT Domestic Ma Only information visit our website at www usps coat TEn�PI FY - tc; _ tantebvisis a igassworts. ..adsuirslirsoo Elsuessimsestselossosis s - mossor $ f ouguirrommowso.r * Dads eipwwwartwonalaivery Pa11440 $0.47 Pasies• aral Itr. 77 0 P 6-ek 'ccpro AjlefkiT-1561Eiii )?C D .D ri ♦T 0 ri 0 D Ir J3 trl N J3 1-4 U' 0' 1-1 D D D r -R 1r D -c r - 7016 0910 0001 9914 6846 U AS. Postal Service' (RTiFIEO MAL"FIECUPT Dome. Plc Moil Only Cwri+ 9d Mil fee $ S . i_I 4'. ta1areaa�1 Extra Swaiaaalfrasaa aarasaat ea_r; n l " ❑w.lamammo Iltn�aU • ❑t ,ir.alaawu++rs.a+r $_ p •e,a • eaters $ '[:. [h:, ❑ malt SooraJraeettataaaq $ $0.47 total hobs* gaol !$w $ ;r Zii5.t.2i�1. SvitToGVif.,ra 1 . PS 1,61 17, 3800. Au[ai : : r �..'..-:.'.a: Ser. Ftevt. for trtstruct,uns U.S. Postal Service' CERTIFIED MAIL' RECEIPT Domestic Mail Only for ;.''very inturmattonvisit out wetisere RI warm usOs. corn°. CrtMed Nail Fos ¢. I U0 Ssrviorta 1 Fina kx.aral ia$811, ry ❑rrmnnmaartr+macata $ D 0 8.8a. 888•1118 (slasembi po.ararrnwta.raorr.y a 3; t JQ ❑ Aau a1080u8 PF$88 a $ is i ❑ Alla $111110.18 ataaakma o•A+•v • rtt$.i Paaya sal Pose. Straw and cont +-et- D Postmark Nap 76(7 f¢tii Illcm rim 3800. KUM 20'. : Sea Rxusrr9tr for Instruction-, U.S. Postal Service" CERTIFIED MAIL"' RECEIPT Domestic Mail Only leilve, intorfrt.litr,,! ' 0i nun vo.okl8rte .•fl ww Golfed MA Rea $3,30 $ 3't_litl Ube Swim 1Fess lima Aat, rid Is. ops. t> ❑Ilelom,mipefue P • Ocaa;wMal flue rrao++r • 311.120 DAtr Swam Ntsieaa $ $1'-.1:11J DAMS uwl+.lratmt taawy $ $11.; LI Postage ostae 77 saraatt. f PO Ps i cee, 3800. Apnl ?q1 .- 1 t � ! J . Postmark tins r-1 m Lt) 7016 0910 0001 9914 ,U.S. ost i Se ICEtTIF D Domestic Malt Only EIP t•or rteityery url rrnahot,ry !'aAakaaMall Fee ,r,;r.„ri! taraLa mat Dais= P•ao•••or•xa4 • MCersm.o%OK -a DM.fy • $ ❑Aaa ower.. Aapnaa • t . , Or O Aaiatw.aae itrray $ Pottml Hera rtf Toac4� '( §aueQ W,Q 1 P51 -arm U.S. Postal Service CERTIFIED MAIL' RECEIPT Domestic Mart Only .10f I!I9tf11C110n9 Fear delivery information. visit our website at www usps conn L CE ' } •xtrr7eaai.ea 1 Faea trarlaan Aad 0nom w08111•ywM • O1W.tY080110aaaa» $ f a 4•i 08$110118$111•010ler..r • ❑MAilstrretlmotr • $ l.1 , go DIMES $ Parlor $0.47 6.77 Postmark Nets • R*wPt se 1,), intiiflN-11nli U.S. Postal Service" CERTIFIED MAIL' RECEIPT Domestic M.311 �7niy Flr+ +$€ $IvW_I 1ntrlrn1.111 ALF :oat can Website al I4'1Y'w.ltslls cam Oar9nlil Ms$Pas $3.30 p¢ Tetra Survisaa i Foes lotrekaacoaf toe Tri ars." Owa 18100081 •raro•3 $ O* .nwwenHr.rankS $ — 0ot1111.a81te881111ttaa$aermlr $ ❑ oast $/amlelr.alatae ee1r., $ NOW $I:i, 7or1 Rrrgr Ptd • Postmark Fors +rs;'TYVs 7016 0910 0001 9914 6877 0 0 0 g-4 N tr -0 r -R 0 S. P stal ery e ER IFI MRIL' AEC IPT1 Domestrc Mail Only Can 'led !awl ,a $ IQ C; ratra Services & Fos mow* tam ads tam ladair. 0 ROW, 6.00-41 6.1060;r0 6 0 :Soon Rem leiscouse) $ 7_! , Rearadaa Samy $ MAWR Signesse 6•10666 :I Das* Dam $ Powwow $1. LI Pommes and F,100 )strnat$ Here gq/1 20L aara To City, St 2)04.4'... -- laUC. Aprvi No tat . OY•13-1toen5S__ • ...... . . ........... U.S. Postal Service CERTIFIED MAILRECEIPT Domestic Mail OM, For riol;very information. visit our website at wwwut;oF terktilso tt Feb 1:1 La Fees foam* aax, ads No as aforafflatei &Ewa %GNP awake* - Inflatea Rea** Opiumamio $ 13Cartaisa Ramaiassi Delivery $ hous Siandiaa Remtrat s: OA*" $$$INIna Miterieted Li Issesese . 77 , Postioatir 6-4M0P3 rs Seri To ft C. Street rat- Mi P4 da..,NA.0 (-A. 0,11. OP 101 U.S. Postal Service " CERTIFIED MAIL: RECEIPT Domestw nth Only ror 01):11010 WPOSlif11 1111'W tiSys COP, A 06111161 Mid ris $3,30 VI Co IlisralanKFre wart am age tam arrippreg 0 PAMIR Mmelpilualsoni • •'•"2 ftunal•IP wow* $ „ t Duro ors assoosess... . 1 oct Asitikgmles•lbusimell DMA Iliviii•eireakimtpaeiry Postage $0. 4 7 Total Poatega wad .thes 1'1 3C1/4- FkI)*kiV S Said 76/ or PC goa-No "4 -- PS P1 irtffirr 411 ."1" 7016 0910 0001 7016 0910 0001 9914 6891 ll& Postal Set vicc. "CITIFIED MAIL' RECEIPT Dom tic MlI O'hy .Fn., ft . a ta visit o webs , • Iv a Fae ,,, i . , -' _,... !1,,:, , - -Paellotirk Hera . _ .'',' .Z.•.11 : mac ke .. , ,. •i 0 11 • D ,. „ Do-nte*, Aall Fisetre,. xi Nowa $ t i ..2.21...._ Adul *purses Reamed I .0 0 Mutt Spealve Rederistee Cielieery a P _ L. Send r. andA11. fi" 72u.„) 4 61 1..• Ai . imi, 1.. Sec Reverse tur tnstructions U.S. Postal Service' CERTIFIED MAIL'' RECEIPT Domestic Mail Only Fr deltvory onormaloan ta.,0 stir wahala,a at www uSps corn Cortifted OMAN* $ tr. an Cit Poems* ExtrallarrierstantwOossuhaLwttaatrm/or 0 .**** • 0 RialwaReadlat Iplidaiwil* 6 '4,-ri .1-irl Eiossirnotiresimillairetv 6 i_ -..11:1 s, friim .. .....7-; i•-..... 7...., . '"1•19,1 l„.116 0 Ad6111166 $ 0 AddlasneleseilialleftiONSVO$ 1 Postage IS Sent 773,- (..,c 4.4-4-AICZ-- Skeet tiviAiit'Afc., orZox he le -1,..t y, 0-0ots /-.4--- . y C- twilpw, . Cf241 tt OCTOBER 19, 2016 BCR CONSULTING LLC CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT PECHAGA PARKWAY WIDENING PROJECT APPENDIX B PHOTOGRAPHS OCTOBER 19, 2016 BCR CONSULTING LLC CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT PECHAGA PARKWAY WIDENING PROJECT Photo 1: Project Site Overview (View east) Photo 2: Project Site Overview Towards Vacant Lot (View North) OCTOBER 19, 2016 BCR CONSULTING LLC CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT PECHAGA PARKWAY WIDENING PROJECT APPENDIX C PALEONTOLOGICAL SENSITIVITY MAP L08 COUNTY COUNTY Riverside County Paleontological Sensitivity Map High A (Ha) High B (Hb) Low U n date rm i need Highways Mao Waterbod les Oecembar 16, 2013 M i toa O 10 20 Oisolnirns, Wisps set. Ont. ars to Os unsaid for rsfarinnos our...wain only. Nino fnisturns =rm. .c�'y of FlissrsiOn rniathss won -ants or siswarnntwit mai to this cont.,. o+Ohm ti .p o..o .00ur r ., P oi.ion .non Os the.nolo.e.ponsihil r f'W. CM... en.. a, a.,o. with City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening Appendix D: Geotechnical Investigation December 2016 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration GEOCON W ES T.1 N C. GEDTECHNICAL ■ ENVIRONMENTAL ■ MATERIALS Project No. T2733-22-01 October 12, 2016 Francisco Martinez Jr., P.E. Michael Baker International 40810 County Center Drive, Suite 200 Temecula, California 92590 Subject: GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION PECHANGA PARKWAY WIDENING VIA GILBERTO TO NORTH CASINO DRIVE CITY PROJECT PW 15-14 TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA Dear Mr. Martinez: In accordance with Proposal 1E-1607 dated February 24, 2016 and the Subconsultant Agreement for Professional Services, Geocon West, Inc. (Geocon) has prepared this report of our geotechnical investigation along Pechanga Parkway from Via Gilberto to North Casino Drive, in Temecula, California. The approximate limits of the project are depicted on the attached Vicinity Map (see Figure 1). This report presents a summary of the methods used to observe the subsurface geologic conditions, measurements of the existing pavement section thicknesses, results of the laboratory testing, and recommendations for design and construction of the roadway widening. Geocon performed geotechnical observation and testing for the City of Temecula during improvements to Pechanga Parkway in 2008 and 2009. As part of this project, we have reviewed our construction records and used that information in evaluation of the currently proposed construction. PROJECT UNDERSTANDING The Pechanga Parkway widening will include improvements to the roadways along Pechanga Parkway between Via Gilberto and North Casino Drive. The extent of the improvements will begin approximately 600 feet southeast of Via Gilberto at Station 86+99 and extend to approximately 600 feet southeast of North Casino Drive at Station 115+36. Pechanga Parkway runs in a northwest/southeast orientation. In the area of the proposed improvements, the roadway consists of two travel lanes and a bike lane in each direction, with a center median. Based on the plans by Michael Baker International, we understand that the planned construction will include widening of the roadway to the northeast, a reduction in median width, and shifting of the medians to accommodate a third lane of traffic in each direction. The improvements will include grading along the northeast side of Pechanga Parkway, relocation of utilities, additional storm drain structures, new lighting, new medians, relocation of a bus pad, construction of a retaining wall, new 41571 Corning Place, Suite 101 • Murrieto, California 92562-7065 • Telephone 951.304.2300 • Fax 951.304.2392 curb and gutter, sidewalk, and irrigation. Portions of the roadway will be milled and overlaid, and areas of widened pavement will receive a new structural section. Grading will include modifying the channel slopes along the northeast side of the roadway. The existing channel slopes along the length of the proposed improvements are approximately 6 to 10 feet in height below the existing roadway. The slopes are inclined at approximately 4:1 to 5:1 (horizontal:vertical). The slopes are separated from the existing paved roadway by a sidewalk and narrow landscaped area. The proposed alterations include steepening some of the slopes to 2:1 (h:v) in order to provide additional area for the roadway widening. The new fill will daylight within the approximate midpoint of the existing slopes. The new slopes will generally be up to 6 feet high with one section northwest of Wolf Valley Road up to 10 feet high. The toe of the new slope will extend to the bottom of the existing channel slope (See Figure 2). A 6 -foot -high retaining wall will be constructed within the existing slope southeast of Wolf Valley Road to provide room for a bus turnout. The recommendations presented herein are based on analysis of the data obtained during the investigation, our work during widening of the roadway in 2008 to 2009, and our experience with similar soil and geologic conditions. If project details vary significantly from those described herein, Geocon should be contacted to determine the necessity for review and possible revision of this report. SCOPE OF SERVICES The purpose of the investigation was to advance borings along the northeast shoulder to observe the subsurface geologic conditions, core the existing pavement sections to measure base and asphalt concrete thicknesses, sample the exposed subgrade soil, perform R -value testing of subgrade soil, evaluate the existing and planned pavement sections based on information obtained during our investigation, and recommend pavement sections for new asphalt concrete roadways and improvement of the existing pavement. Our scope of services included the following: • Mark the proposed core locations and notify Underground Service Alert (USA) to locate and mark utilities in the proposed investigation area. • Obtain an encroachment permit from the City of Temecula. • Advance three borings along the northeast side of the roadway. The borings were performed to observe surficial geologic conditions and to collect samples for laboratory testing and analyses. • Excavate six pavement cores in the roadways. The existing asphalt concrete pavement and aggregate base thicknesses were measured and bulk samples were collected from the base and subgrade. • Perform laboratory testing of the surficial soil, including R -value, direct shear, consolidation, moisture content, and in-place density. • Prepare this written report presenting our findings, conclusions and recommendations. Geocon Project No. T2733-22-01 - 2 - October 12, 2016 EXISTING CONDITIONS Based on our work during widening of the roadway in 2008 to 2009, our records indicate that the existing roadway consists of approximately 61/2 inches of asphalt concrete over approximately 12 to 17 inches of aggregate base (along both sides of the roadway). During one phase of the roadway construction, the subgrade soils required use of geogrid beneath the pavement section due to poor subgrade conditions encountered during construction. The northeastern side of the roadway consists of various generations of pavement with older pavement being overlaid in the No. 1 lane. Laboratory test results during the 2008 and 2009 roadway construction indicated that the subgrade between Sta 87+00 and 103+00 had an R -value of 64, and we recommended a pavement structural section of 6.5 inches of asphalt concrete over 12 inches of aggregate base. Between Sta 103+00 and 115+00, the subgrade had an R -value of 20, and we recommended a pavement structural section of 6.5 inches of asphalt concrete over 17.5 inches of aggregate base. During our site reconnaissance and field exploration on August 31 and September 1, 2016, the existing pavement did not exhibit signs of severe distress within the area of the proposed road