Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
061395 CC Agenda
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (909) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104ADA T~le II] AGENDA TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL A REGULAR MEETING COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER 30875 RANCHO VISTA ROAD JUNE 13, 1995 - 7:00 PM 5:30 PM - Closed Session of the City Council pursuant to Govemment Code Sections: 1. §54956.8, CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR, Property: Bounded by Rancho California Road and Ynez Road, a portion of Ass~ssor'e Parcel Number 944-330-006; Negotiating parties: City of Temecula and Kernper Real Estate Company; Under negotiation: Proposed price end terms for the sale of real property. 2. §54956.8, CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR, Property: Assessor'a Parcel No. 935-380, Parcels 008, 009, 010, 011: Negotiating parties: City of Temecule and Jack Buck (Gerald Barnes); Under negotiation: Proposed pdce and terms for sale of real property. 3. §54956.9(c), Initiation of Litigation, one item. CALL TO ORDER: Invocation: Flag Salute: ROLL CALL: PRESENTATIONS/ PROCLAMATIONS At approximately 9:45 PM, the City Council will determine which of the remaining agenda items can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00 PM and may continue all other items on which additional time is required until a future meeting. All meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 PM. Next in Order: Ordinance: No. 95-08 Resolution: No. 95-48 Mayor Jeffrey Stone presiding Pastor Gary Nelson, Calvary Chapel of Tamecula Mayor Pro Tam Lindemans Lindemans, Muf~oz, Parks, Robarts, Stone Certificates of Appreciation - Bob & Bee Taylor, Tom Leevers and Laura Cannon-Behnke - Celloway Winery R:~genda%0 11796 I Amateur Radio Week - Proclamation Essay Contest Winners PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 30 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Council on items that are not listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council on an item not listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk before the Council gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made at this time. A total, not to exceed, ten (10) minutes will be devoted to these reports. CONSENT CALENDAR I Standard Ordinance Adootion Procedure RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. 2 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve the minutes of May 23, 1995. 3 Resolution ADoroving List of Demands RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 95- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A R:%Age~de%011796 2 4 7 City Treasurer's Report RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Receive and file the City Treasurer's Report as of April 30, 1995. Release Warranty. Labor and Material. and Subdivision Monument Securities in Tract No. 23160 RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Authorize the release of Faithful Performance Warranty, Labor and Material, and Subdivision Monument Securities in Tract No. 23160; 5.2 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, the Developer and the Surety. Substitute Public Facility Fee Aoreement and Bond for PA94-0025 in Parcel MaD No. 23624 RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Accept the substitute Public Facility Fee Agreement and bond for PP 10579 and PP94-oo25 in Parcel Map No. 23624; 6.2 Authorize the release of the existing agreement and bond on file; 6.3 Direct the City Clerk to so notify the several Developers and Sureties. Release Subdivision Monument Bond in Parcel MaD No. 23624 RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 Authorize release of Subdivision Monument Bond in Parcel Map No. 23624; 7.2 Direct the City Clerk to so notify the Developer and Surety. R :~endaV) 11716 3 8 9 10 11 Comoletion and Acceotance of the Construction of Pala Road at Highway 79S Interim Rioht Turn Lane. Proiect No. PW94-08 RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 Accept the Construction of Pala Road at Highway 79S Interim Right Turn Lane, Project No. PW94-08, as complete and direct the City Clerk to: File the Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a one (1) year Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract; Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after the filing of the Notice of completion if no liens have been filed. Comoletion and Acceotance of the Traffic Sional Installation at MarQarita Road & Avenida Barca. Project No. PW93-10 RECOMMENDATION: 9.1 Accept the Construction of a Traffic Signal Installation at Margarita Road & Avenida Barca, Project No. PW93-10, as complete and direct the City Clerk to: · File the Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a six (6) month Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract; · Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after the filing of the Notice of completion if no liens have been filed. Release Faithful Performance and Labor and Material Bonds for Street Imorovements. and the Monument Bond in Parcel MaD No. 23426 RECOMMENDATION: 10. 1 Authorize the release of the Faithful Performance and Labor and Material Bond for Street Improvements and the Subdivision Monumentation Bond in Parcel Map No. 23426; 10.2 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Surety. Professional Consultant Selection Policy RECOMMENDATION: 11.1 Approve the Policy for Professional Consultant Selection. It:~lend,~O 117 N 4 12 Tract MaD No. 27827 (located north of Nicolas Road and east of Winchester Road) RECOMMENDATION: 12.1 Approve Final Tract Map No. 27827, subject to the Conditions of Approval. 13 Contract Amendment No. 2 to the Professional Services Contract for Civil En(~ineerino - Parkview Site Grading and Imorovements. Proiect No. PW93-09 RECOMMENDATION: 13.1 Approve Contract Amendment No. 2 to provide additional civil engineering services for the Parkview Site Grading Project by NBS/Lowry in the amount of ~ 1,220.00. 14 Solicitation of Construction Bids for Walcott Corridor Project - PW94-10 RECOMMENDATION: 14.1 Approve the plans and specifications and authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit public construction bids for Walcott Corridor - Project PW94-10. PUBLIC HEARINGS Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing. R:~e~gend~e~011796 6 15 PlanninQ Aoolication No. 95-0003- Westside Soecific Plan. Plannino Aoolication No. 95- 0004 - Tentative Tract Mao No. 28011. Planning AoDlication No. 94-0061 - Master Conditional Use Permit. Plannino Aoolication No. 95-0031 - Environmental Impact Report and Develooment Aoreement No. DV95-0001 RECOMMENDATION: 15.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 95- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA CERTIFYING' PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 95-0031 (FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT) ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT AND .STATEMENTS OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATION AND APPROVING THE MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED WEST OF INTERSTATE 15, EAST OF THE CITY'S WESTERN BORDER, SOUTH OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AND NORTH OF THE SANTA MARGARITA RIVER 15.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: 15.3 RESOLUTION NO. 95- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 95-0003 (WESTSIDE SPECIFIC PLAN) AND CHANGING THE ZONE FROM R-Ao20 (RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL - TWENTY ACRE MINIMUM PARCEL SIZE) TO S-P (SPECIFIC PLAN) ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED WEST OF PUJOL STREET, EAST OF THE CITY'S WESTERN BORDER SOUTH OF RIDGE PARK DRIVE, AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 940-310-0 13,940-320-001,940-320-002,940-320-003,940-320- 004, 940-320-005, 940-320-006AND 940-320-007 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 95- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF SAID CITY IN THE CHANGE OF ZONE APPLICATION CONTAINED IN PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 95-0003, CHANGING THE ZONE FROM R-A-20 (RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL o TWENTY ACRE MINIMUM PARCEL SIZE) TO S-P (SPECIFIC PLAN) ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED WEST OF PUJOL STREET, EAST OF THE CITY'S WESTERN BORDER SOUTH OF RIDGE PARK DRIVE, AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 940-310-013,940-320-001,940-320-002,940-320-003,940-320- 004, 940-320-005,940-320-006AND 940-320-007 R:%Agende%011796 6 15.4 15.5 15.6 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 95- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 94-0061 (MASTER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) TO PERMIT CABARET THEATERS (2), SALOONS (2), AN OPERA HOUSE, TV/RADIO STATION, VIRTUAL REALITY THEATERS (2), A QUICK DRAW AREA, ADMINISTRATIVE AND TICKET OFFICES IN AN AREA GENERALLY BOUNDED BY SIXTH STREET TO THE NORTH, FIRST STREET TO THE SOUTH, MURRIETA CREEK TO THE WEST AND INTERSTATE 15 TO THE EAST Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 95- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 95-0004 (TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 28011 ) TO SUBDIVIDE 154.1 ACRES INTO EIGHT (S) PARCELS ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED WEST OF PUJOL STREET, EAST OF THE CITY'S WESTERN BORDER SOUTH OF RIDGE PARK DRIVE, AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 940-310-0 13,940-320-001,940-320-002, 940-320-003,940-320-004, 540-320- 005, 540-320-006AND 940-320-007 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 95- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. DV95-0001 FOR PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 95-0003 (WESTSIDE SPECIFIC PLAN) 16 Public Nuisance Abatement- 30301 Nicolas Road RECOMMENDATION: 16.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 95- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING THE CITY'S COSTS OF ABATING THE PUBLIC NUISANCE AT 30301 NICOLAS ROAD, TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA AND DIRECTING THAT SUCH COSTS SHALL CONSTITUTE A LIEN AGAINST THE PROPERTY AND REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 9540 R:~Aeenda%011796 7 17 Winchester Road/Interstate 15 Interchange Improvements Proiect Acauisition of Real Prooertv RECOMMENDATION: 17.1 Conduct the hearing, review the evidence presented, including this staff report and public comments and close the hearing; 17.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 95- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THAT ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN PROPERTY FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES {WINCHESTER ROAD/INTERSTATE 15 INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS) (Note: This requires an affirmative FOUR-FIFTHS (4/5) vote of the City Council); 17.3 17.4 17.5 Direct the City Attorney to file the action expeditiously; Issue two (2) warrants, totaling the sum set forth, payable to the Clerk of Superior Court, in the amounts respectively of $411,650 (KR Palm Plaza Properties) and $37,250 (Mervyn's Properties); Authorize the City Manager to execute all documents necessary to acquire the properties, including, without limitation, the forms necessary to obtain Caltrans certification of right-of-way. COUNCIL BUSINESS 18 Appointment of Planning Commissioners RECOMMENDATION: 18.1 Review the recommendations of the Ad Hoc Committee and appoint two applicants to serve a full three (3) year term on the Planning Commission. R:'U~Oende%011796 8 19 20 Leaoue of California Cities Inland Empire Division Solit (Placed on the agenda at the request of Councilmember Mui~oz) RECOMMENDATION: 19.1 Instruct the Mayor to send a representative to the June 28th General Membership Meeting of the League of California Cities Inland Empire Division to voice the City of Temecula's position regarding a proposal to split the Division into separate Riverside and San Bernardino divisions. 19.2 Instruct the Mayor to submit a letter to the President of the Division before the July 24th deadline stating whether or not Temecula supports the proposed split. Proposed IRS ReQulations to End Tax ExemPt Assessment District and Mello-Roos Community Facilities District Financing (Placed on the agenda at the request of Mayor Stone) RECOMMENDATION: 20.1 Direct staff to prepare a letter protesting IRS consideration of removing tax exempt status on certain types of municipal bonds. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT ADJOURNMENT Next meeting: June 15, 1995, 7:00 PM, CIP Workshop, City Hall Main Conference Room, 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Next regular meeting: June 27, 1995, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. R:V~gende~O 117 e6 I TEMECUI,,A COMMUNITY: SER.ylCrtpJSTRICT MEETING - Cro be held ~ 8:00) eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee CALL TO ORDER: President Ronald H. Roberts ROLL CALL: DIRECTORS: Lindemans, Mu~oz, Parks, Stone, Roberts PUBLIC COMMENT: A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Board of Directors on items that are not listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Board of Directors on an item not listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items a 'Request to Speak' form must be filed with the City Clerk before the Board of Directors gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors, should present a completed pink "Request to Speak" to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address for the record. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the minutes of May 23, 1995. R:~/~ende~011786 10 PUBLIC HEARINGS 2 TCSD Proposed Rates and Charoes for Fiscal Year 1995-1996 RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. CSD 95- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ADOPTING RATES AND CHARGES FOR COMMUNITY SERVICES, PARKS AND RECREATION, STREET LIGHTING, SLOPE MAINTENANCE, AND RECYCLING AND REFUSE COLLECTION SERVICES FOR FISCAL YEAR 1995- 1996 3 Service Level R - ProDosed Rates and Charcaes for Fiscal Year 1995-1996 RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. CSD 95- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ADOPTING RATES AND CHARGES FOR STREET AND ROAD IMPROVEMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1995-1996 4 Temecula Middle School Liqhting Project RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Adopt the Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program prepared for the Temecula Middle School Lighting Project; 4.2 Approve the plans and specifications for the Temecula Middle School Lighting Project; 4.3 Authorize the release of a formal public bid for the Temecula Middle School Lighting Project. GENERAL MANAGERS REPORT- Bradley DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT - Nelson BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS ADJOURNMENT: Next meeting: June 27, 1995, 8:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. R:',A4lenda~117~6 11 TEMI:CULA RFPFW:I OPMFNT ',~GENCY NErnNe .' ·. CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Ronald J. Perks presiding ROLL CALL: AGENCY MEMBERS: Lindemans, Mu~oz, Roberrs, Stone, Parks PUBLIC COMMENT: A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Redevelopment Agency on items that ere not listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Agency on an item not listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk before the Agency gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. CONSENT CALENDAR I Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the minutes of May 23, 1995. 2 Certificates of Redevelooment Plan Conformance (PA95-0037, PA 95-0038, PA95-0039, PA95-0040. PA95-0041 ) RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve, authorize the Chairman to sign, and the City Clerk/Agency Secretary to attest and so record, Certificates of Conformance. 796 12 3 Aoorooriate FUnds for Title Reoort Acouirement, AoDrooriate Agencies' Permit Aoolications. Indeoendent Check of the Bridge olans. and the Reoroduction Cost of Documents Associated with the Design of First Street, and Contract Amendment No. I for the First Street Design RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Appropriate ~50,000 for title report acquirement, appropriate agencies' permit applications, independent check of the bridge plans, and the reproduction cost of documents associated with the design of First Street; 3.2 Approve Contract Amendment No. 1, and authorize Chairperson to execute the Amendment between the City and Norris-Repke, Inc., in the amount of ~68,952 bring the total contract amount to $243,794. The Agreement will be subject to the approval of the Executive Director and the General Counsel as to final form; 3.3 Appropriate an additional $101,467.80 of Redevelopment Agency's bond proceeds in Capital Improvement Program fund for the design of First Street for title report acquirement, appropriate agencies; permit applications, independent check of the bridge plans, and the reproduction cost of documents associated with the design of first Street, and contract amendment no. 1 for the First Street design. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT AGENCY MEMBER'S REPORTS ADJOURNMENT: Next Meeting: June 27, 1995, 8:00 PM, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. R:~,~erx:lm~11786 13 PROCLAMATIONS/ PRESENTATIONS Celticate of Agpredation cith,e~s of lhe ~ of Temec~fi% Presentedto For their dedicmed volunteer service to the City of Temecula and to the Old Town Historic Area. Bob and Bea are comme~4e~ for their generous donation of both time and talent for the past 14 years delighting thousands of youngsters in their roles as Mr. and Mrs. ,Santa Clam and acting as the Official Old Town ~ten. IN WrfNF, SS WItI~EOF, I have hereunto affixed my band and official ~ _this 13th day of June, 1995 Jeffrey E. Stone Mayor June S. ~, CIVIC City Clerk Celticate of Appreciation cid?ens of the City of For heroutstanding-service to the community. as. City Coordinator of the Temecuh Neighborhood Watch Program. laura has been successful in adding approximately 16 new neighborhoods to the the program since assuming the duties of City Coordinator and has increased participation in the program across the board. IN WITNESS WtilaqX)F, I have hereunto affixed my hand and official seal this 13th day of June, 1995 Jeffrey E. Stone Mayor June S. Greek, CMC ~ty aerk Ceraficate of Appreciation For the consistent and un~l~$h donation of his time and auctioneering talents assisting the fund raising efforts of orFmiza~ons rich as the HillCreSt ~ School, Boy Scouts of America and the Temecula Firebirds. Tom's community service to the young men of the community through his active involvement with the Boy Scout Program has also been especially generous. IN WITNESS WHEsq. EOF, I have hereunto affixed my hand and official seal this 13th day of June, 1995 ~effrey s. stone Mayor June S. Greek, CMC city Ch~rk The of Temecula PROCLAMATION Wlfi~e~.AS, the City of Temecula has many liees~sed Amatetw Radio o~ who have demonstrated their value in public assistance by providing emergency radio communications; and WH!e. REAg, the~ ~kmlte~n' Radio ~ donat~ ~ ~ fr~ of charg~ to the City in the in~e. st of the cith,,*ns of th~ City as well as the world; and WHEREAg, th~ Am.m~r Radio operators at= on ~ for ~nergency, local or worM-. wide, and pmcti~ their communication st-ills dttdng the Amexican Radio Rehy League,/nc.'s Field Day exercise; and WHs.;mtE,$.S, this years' Am,teu~' Radio Field Day will rat-~. place on ltme 24-25, 1995; NOW, THEREFORE, I, Jeff/E. Stone, Mayor of the City of Temecula, hereby declare the week of June 18-25, 1995 *,~mntenr Ratio Weeks in recognition of this important emergency preparedness exercise, and call upon all citizens to pay appropriate tribute to the Amateur Radio operators of our City. IN WI'FNF. SS WHe;REOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City of Temecula to be affixed this 13th day of June, 1995. Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk ITEM 1 ITEM 2 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL HELD MAY 23, 1995 A regular meeting of the Ternecula City Council was called to order at 7:00 PM at the Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Street, Temecula, California. Mayor Jeffrey E. Stone presiding. , PRESENT 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Lindemans, Mu~oz, Parks, Stone, Robarts ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None Also present were City Manager Ronald Bradley, City Attorney Peter M. Thorson, and City Clerk June S. Greek. EXECUTIVE SESSION A meeting of the City of Temecula City Council was called to order at 5:40 PM. It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Roberrs to adjourn to Executive Session pursuant to Government Code §54956.9(A)Claim of Chades and Sharon Miller and §54956.9, Pending Litigation, Hill vs. City of Temecula. ... The motion was unanimously carried. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The audience was led in the flag salute by Councilmember Roberrs. PRESENTATIONS/ PROCLAMATIONS Mayor Stone presented Certificates of Appreciation to The Women's Club of Temecula, Paradise Chevrolet and the Law Offices of Lorenz, Alhadeff, Cannon and Rose for their generous support of the Old Town Temecula Senior Center by assisting in the purchase of a handicapped equipped van to better serve the needs of the Senior Citizens of Temecula. PUBLIC COMMENTS John Hunneman, 39557 Del Val Drive, Murrieta, thanked Councilmember J. Sal Mufioz for his 6 years of hard work. Mark McCormick, 29850 Gafeview Court, representing TOTAL, stated the purpose of the initiative petition being circulated is to prevent public credit being used to finance the Buffman project or similar projects without a majority vote. Cad Hanauer, 31010 Ave Buena Suerte, spoke regarding a meeting held in mid April with Mr. Bradley, Mr. Thorson, Ms. Wisanand, and Mayor Pro Tam Lindemans of the City and Melvin Copeland and Mark McCormick of TOTAL. Ha said based on recent correspondence from Ms. IVinutes~5~23%gS -1 - 06/07/96 City Courr, il IVinutee 14sv 23, 1994 Wisenand, he wishes to be on record as supporting the initiative currently being circulated by TOTAL. Joseph R. Tarrazes, 31160 Lahonfan Street, spoke in opposition to the Old Town Entertainment Center. Wayne Hall, 42131 Agena, spoke against the proposed initiative stating he voted to elect the Council, not TOTAL and if the initiative prevails, the Council's hands will be tied. Jeff Stone, 43136 John Warner Road, shaking as a private citizen, urged the citizens of Temecula to closely examine the impacts of the proposed initiative, stating its impacts would be far reaching and tie the hands of the City Council in many future transactions that are important to the City. He also stated that if citizens have signed the petition and wish to have their name removed, they can do so per Govemment Code Section 9602. Cynthia Arocha-Kitchel, 44535 Bedford Court, expressed concern with the traffic situation at Bedford Court and Highway 79 South and asked the Council to investigate. City Attorney Peter Thorson reported on the closed session, stating with respect to claim of the Millers, the Council authorized the City Attorney to make a settlement offer. He reported that in the matter of Hale vs. the City of Temecula, further direction was given to staff. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Councilmember Parks requested that staff look into the possible signalization at the intersection of Enterprise Circle North and Winchester. Public Works Director Joe Kicak announced this matter will be heard before the Public\Traffic Safety Commission at next meeting. Councilmember Mufio2 tendered his resignation from the City Council and advised the Council and citizens of Temecula that it would be effective June 16, 1995, allowing time to tie up loose ends and to facilitate a smooth transition. CONSENT CALENDAR Councilmember Robarts requested the removal of Items 4 and 6 from the Consent Calendar. Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans removed Item No. 7 from the Consent Calendar. Councilmember Mufioz registered an abstention on Item No. 6. Mayor Stone removed Item No. 12 from the Consent Calendar to allow for public comment on this item. Minutee~b'%23%gS -2- 06/07/95 City Coundl Minute Mev 23. 1994 It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans to approve Consent Calendar Items 1-3, 5,6, 8-11, 13 and 14 with Councilmember Mufioz abstaining on Item No. 6.. The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 Lindemans, Mulloz. Parks, Roberrs, Stone COUNCILMEMBERS: None COUNCILMEMBERS: None of all ordinances and resolutions Standard Ordinance Adoorion Procedure 1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text included in the agenda. Minutes 2.1 Approve the minutes of May 9, 1995. Resolution Aoorovino List of Demands 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 9543 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A e Solicitation of Construction Bids for Access RamPs Pro)ect - PW 95-04 5.1 Approve the plans land specifications and authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit public construction bids for Access Ramps - Project PW95-04. Minutes%5%23%95 -3- 06/07/95 City Council Minutes Mmf 2.~. 1994 Contract ehanae Order No. 4for Winchester Road Interim Street Imorovements. Prgject PW94-03 6.1 Approve Contract Change Order No. 4 for Winchester Road Interim Street Improvements~ Project PW9at03 for Additional Aggregate Base - Class 2 in the amount of $27,660.00. 6.2 Approve a budget transfer in the amount of ~24,537.64 from the Pavement Management Project to the Winchester Road Interim Street Improvements Project. e 10. Suoolemental No. 007 to Local Agency Aareement for Federal Aid Projects No. 5459 for Federal Grant Fundina for Pala Road Bridoe 8.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 95-55 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECU.-luB, APPROVING PROGRAM SUPPLEMENTAL NO. 007, TO LOCAL AGENCY AGREEMENT NO. 08-5459, BETWEEN THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR FEDERAL AID PROJECT NO. BRLS-5459(003), PALA ROAD BRIDGE Amended Memorandum of Understandina - Access to Winchester Road end State Route 79 South 9.1 Approve the amended Memorandum of Understanding with Caltrans and authorize the Mayor to sign. Tree Trimming Program in Starlight Ridge Area 10.1 Authorize staff to call for bids for Tree Trimming Program in the Starlight Ridge Area. 11. Release Traffic Signal Mitiaation Bond in Tract No. ~6861-3 11.1 Authorize the release of Traffic Signal Mitigation Bond in Tract No. 26861-3 and Direct the City Clerk to so notify the Developer and Surety, Minutee%5~23%95 -I.- 06/07/95 13. 14. ;,sement from Tomond ProMrties Iimited for Maintenance of I ooo Detectors at Rio Rtmd and Front Rtreet 13.1 Accept the easement from Tomond Properties Limited for the maintenance of loop detectors at Dd Rio Road and Front Street. Resolution Reouestino Inland Emoire Postmark DesiO nation 14.1 Adopt a resdution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 9546. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA REQUESTING INLAND EMPIRE POSTMARK DESIGNATION e Public Nuisance Abatement- 30301 Nicolas Road Councilmember Robera questioned the need for a second public hearing on this issue. Chief Building Official Tony Elmo stated some of the notices were not mailed via certified mail, therefore in the interest of fairness the public hearing should be re-done. It was moved by Councilmember Robarts, seconded by Councilmember Parks to approve staff recommendation as follows: 4.1 Set the date of a public hearing for June 13, 1995, at 7:00 PM, for the purpose of confirming the cost to the City for the abatement of a public nuisance at 30301 Nicolas Road. The motion was unanimously carried. Contract Chanoe Order No. 4 for Winchester Road Interim Street Imorovements. Project PW94-03 Councilmember Robarts asked why this change order is necessary. Public Work Director Joe Kicak explained the Change Order is necessary due to a staff error in converting quantities from cubic yards to tonnage. He reported that in negotiating the change order, he was able to get unit prices reduced, and felt the change was fair to both parties. Minutes%5~23~95 -5- 06,4D7,-'V5 May 2~. 1994 It was moved by Councilmember Roberrs, seconded by Councilmember Parks to approve staff recommendation as follows: 6.1 Approve Comrect Change Order NO. 4 for Winchaster road Interim Street Improvements, Project PW94-03 for Additional Aggregate Base - Class 2 in the amount of $27,660.00. 6.2 Approve a budget transfer in the amount of $24,537.64 from the Pavement Management Project to the Winchester Road Interim Street Improvements Project. The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Undemaris, Parks, Roberrs, Stone NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: Norm ABSTAIN: I COUNCILMEMBERS: Muftoz .': e Solicitation of Construction Bids for Sidewalk Imorovements on Rencho Vista Road and Mira Loma Drive - Proiect PW94-19 Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans stated this project provides continuous sidewalks around a public school and stressed the importance the City of Temecula places on public safety. It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans to approve staff recommendation as follows: 7.1 Approve the construction plans and specifications and authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit public construction bids for sidewalk improvements on Rancho Vista Road and Mira Loma Drive - Project PW94-19. : The motion was unanimously carried. 12. Stop Controls on Milky Way Drive at Asteroid Way Wayne Hall, 42131 Agena, spoke in favor of staff recommendation and asked that additional stop controls be installed in the Starlight Ridge area. Minutes%~23%95 -6- 06/07/95 City Council Minutes May 2-q. 1994 It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Mayor Pro Tam Lindemans to approve staff recommendation as follows: 12,1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO, 9548 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABUSHING STOP SIGNS The motion was unanimously carried. RECESS Mayor Stone called a recess at 7:53 PM. The meeting was reconvened following the previously schedule Community Services District and Redevelopment Agency Meeting at 8:35 PM. Mayor Stone announced the next City Council meeting on June 13, 1995, will be broadcast live on cable television. PUBLIC HEARINGS Planning Aoolication No, PA 940098. Nicolas Valley Soecial Study Planning Director Gary Thornhill presented the staff report. Mark Rogers, representing NBS Lowry, briefly outlined densities. alternatives for various Helen N. Lasanga, 30885 Nicolas Road, spoke in favor of the current zoning and asked that this area remain a rural community, Cecil E. Edwards, 31250 Nicolas Road, spoke in favor of the current zoning. Dennis Fit2, 39910 Jeffrey Heights Road, spoke in favor of increasing the density in this area. RECESS Mayor Stone called a brief recess at 9:10 PM to change the tape. The meeting was reconvaned at 9:16 PM. Mike Knowlton, 39130 Pala Vista Drive, representing Citizens for a Rural Temecula, read a letter into the record recommending no change be made to current zoning. Minute.%5123~g5 -7- 06/07/95 CiTy Coundl MinuTe May 23. 1994 City Clerk June Greek announced Alfred Owen telephoned a protest against a change of zoning in the area, and requested the record reflect that action. Banning Director Gary Thornhill stated he had residents request an increase of density and this is why the study was done. He reported that low interest was shown on changing the zoning and staff recommendation is to retain the existing 2 112 acre size lots. He reported the Planning Commission upheld that recommendation.. It was moved by Councilmember Roberrs, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans to approve staff recommendation to retain the existing 2 1/2 acre size lots. The motion was unanimously carried. Hearing no objections, Mayor Stone reordered the agenda to hear. Item No. 17 out of order: COUNCIL BUSINESS 17. Temecula Education Aoorenticeshio Model (T.E.A.M.) Prooram Human Resources Administrator Grant Yates presented the staff report. Dr. Jay Hoffman, Assistant Superintendent of Temecula Valley Unified School District outlined the program. It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Roberts to direct staff to implement the proposed program. The motion was unanimously carried. 18. Sorav Injection Machine (Requested by Mayor Stone) Public Works Director Joe Kicak presented the staff report. Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans suggested the City look into a joint venture with other cities. Councilmember Muftoz stated he does not feel it is practical to purchase this type of equipment for Temecula only, but would agree to a joint venture between several cities. Councilmember Parks stated he would support allowing private enterprise to administer this program. Minutes%b'%23~95 -8- 06/07/95 City Ceundl Minute May 23. 1994 It was moved by Mayor Pro Tern I. indernap. s, seconded by Councilmember Parks to direct staff to investigate the possibility of a joint venture purchase and use with other jurisdictions. It was further moved to receive and file the report. The motion was unanimously carried. Agoroyal of Joint Traffic Safety Prosram {Oneration SCAIR) It was moved by Councilmember Roberte,' seconded by Councilmember Parks to approve staff recommendation as follows: 18.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 9547 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING AN AGREEMENT TO PARTICIPATE IN A JOINT TRAFFIC SAFETY PROJECT WITH THE CAUFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL, THE RIVERSIDE SHERIFFS DEPARTMENTAND OTHER SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES The motion was unanimously carried. Discussion of Possible Board of Supervisors Action to Cease Funding for Western Riverside Council of Governments Councilmember Roberrs stated he placed this item on the agenda to obtain support from the Council of the recommendation that the County of Riverside continue membership in WRCOG before that matter goes before the Board of Supervisors for possible funding cuts. Councilmember Parks voiced his support of WRCOG, and reported this organization brings together cities in Riverside County and the County of Riverside to discuss matters of regional importance. He stated this organization has not increased its cost since inception and through grants like RCTC, has taken on special projects. It was directed by unanimous consensus that the Mayor be authorized to speak on behalf of the City before the Riverside County Board of Supervisors in favor of their continued participation in WRCOG and that a letter to that effect also be sent. Consideration of Street Namina Proerem City Clerk June Greek presented the staff report. IVlinutes%5~23~gS -~- 06/07/95 CiTy Coundl Minutes May 23. 1994 Councilmember Mufioz stated it is his understanding streets am named by developers or property owners and questioned whether this would be precedence setting. Mayor Pro Tem stated he is not in favor of this progrsm. Chief Building Official 'Tony Elmo stated the City of Corona has recently approved this program, and there are a lot of questions that need to be answered. He stated he could meeting with the City Engineer and Planning Director to try and resolve these issues. Mayor Stone stated he would like to support the American Cancer Society, but is concerned about policies. He asked the Council to remain open and allow in concept,. the American Cancer Society to auction off a street name, With the Council reserving the right to approve the final name, and allow staff to come back with a policy. Councilmember Parks moved to refer the matter to staff to come up with method to accommodate this, The motion died for a lack of a second, It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans, seconded by Councilmember Roberrs to receive and file the report. The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: 3 COUNCILMEMBERS: Lindemans, Mur~oz, Roberrs NOES: 2 COUNCILMEMBERS: Parks, Stone CITY MANAGER'S REPORT None given. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT None given. Mi~m~5~3W5 -1~ 06J7J5 City Coundl Minutes M~v 23. 1994 ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans to adjourn at 10:10 PM to a meeting on June 13, 1995, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. The motion was unanimously carried. ATTEST: Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk Minutee%5~.3%g5 -11- 06/07/95 ITEM 3 1LESO~ON NO. 9~- A RESOL~ON OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TI~!ECULA ALvOWING CERTAIN ~ AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN m:xH anlT A THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMBCULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the fonowing claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A have been audited by the City Manager, and that the same are hereby allowed in the amount of $1,171,408.99 Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this zesolufion. APPROVED AND ADOFI*'!n), this 13th day of June, 1995. ATTEST: Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk [S kL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS crrY OFTEMECULA) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby dO certify that the foregoing Re,~lution No. 9~- was duly adopted at a ~ meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the l~th day of June, 199~ by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOF~: ABSENT: COUNt: ' COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNTERS: June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk Ruos'~5 2 CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS 0N18/E6 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 05/'25/95 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 06/01/g6 TOTAL CHECK RU N: o6113/g5 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 06/01/95 TOTAL PAYFK)U.: N&,~06.I2 ~6,437J0 117,4/1J6 TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR I)t/13/16 COUNCIL MEETING: $ 1,.171,4~ DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND: CHECKS: 001 GENERAL 100 GAS TAX 12O DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FUND 14o COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK ellANT 165 RDA-LOW/MOD 190 COMMUNITY SERVICE8 DITRICT 1~1 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 192 TCSD BERVICE LEVEL B 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 194 TCBD BERVICE LEVEL D 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ (CIP) 220 MARGARITA ROAD REIMB~ D18T. 250 CARTAL PROJECTS - TCSD 280 RDA-CIP 300 INSURANCE 310 VEHICLES 320 INFORMATIONS SYSTEMS 330 - SUPPORT SERVICES 340 FACILITIES 380 RDA-DEBT SERVICE 390 TCSD DEBT SERVICE N7,137.82 M,~e.87 0.00 74,l~e.07 20,~Q8.44 21,716.74 25,e62.19 o.oo o.oo 1 28o,677.61 a,183.~4 o.oo 17,412.93 5,314.90 1~0,10e.19 0.00 pAYROll. 001 GENERAL 100 GAS TAX 165 RDA-LO~N/MOD 190 TCSD 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVELA 192 TC, SD SERVICE LEVEL B 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 280 RDA-CIP 300 INSUI:I~ICE 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 340 FACILITIES 7~,740,82 11,791 438,70 1,808,65 1,707.75 641.91 1,~36.10 117,471 TOTAL BY FUND: GENIE ROBBTS, RNANCE OFFICER RONALD E. BIV~LEY, CIT~ MANAGER S 1,171,408.gg . HEFEBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOU, OWiNG 18 TRUE AND CORRECT. , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FCXIOW1NG 18 TRUE AND CORRECT. VOUCHRE2 14:55 CITY OF TBIECULA V~UCHERICHECK GEGISTBt Felt ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE 001 GENERAl. FUND 100 GAS TAX FUll 165 RDA DEV- LOU/IIX) SET ASIDE 190 COI!IIITY SERVICES DISTRICT 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 210 CAPITAL IIIPROVEIEliT PROJ FUND 280 REDEVELaPtlENT AGENCY - CIP 300 INSURANCE FUND 320 INFORK~TION SYSTBIS 330 SIJPPORT SERVICES FACILITIES 380 RDA - DEBT SERVICE TOTAL A/I3UNT 37,631.52 10,74T.3~ 1~2.82 13,147.23 576.59 278.28 1,456.00 22,750.60 5,3Z9.78 157.61 1,071.93 1,524.88 150,109.19 245,305.82 VQUCHRE2 CITY OF TE)IECULA 'T"""~5 14:55 VOUCHEIt/CHEaC REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PA~E vuuCHER/ CHECX CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEN ACCQIMr litllER DATE NUIBER M DESCRIPTION IMBER ITEN NIQUIIT 23640 05/15/95 001963 U.S. AllflY CORPS OF ENGI PSKVIEV PS.ri' PEltfliT 2364105/15/95 001183 CALIFORNIA REGIONAL MAT PSlCVIEU PItOJT PERNIT 210-190-138-5802 210-190-138-5802 100.00 500.00 100.00 SO0.O0 23642 05/15/95 001004 CALIFORNIA DEPT OF FISH PIUOlILqd PRJT STRENIB ALTER 210-1~0-138-5802 ~3 05/15/95 000700 TEI~CULA RRTS COUNCIL IIAYOR,S BALL TICKET:LINDEMNIS 001-100-f~-5260 50.00 SO.OO /46~ 05/16/95 000&13 CALIFORNIA DEPT OF FISH SOIL TEST FOR NL~UtIETA CREEK 001-1990 ~5 05/16/95 000936 AMERICAN RED CI~)SS LIFEGUARD CLASS CERTIFICATIOR 190 -183.,&9/5 23646 05/16/95 000354 RIVERSIDE 00. HEALTH DE OR CNTR STOVE PLAN CK INSTALL 1~0-181-~J~-5250 23647 05/16/95 000253 POSTHASTER IDA PtJBLICATIOR BLJLK NAILING 280-199-999-5/40 1,100.00 2,300,00 12100.00 2,300.00 .' 419137 05/18/95 O004~r~, FIRSTAX (El)D) 00F:~ SOl 001-2(70 419137 05/18/95 O004/,X~ FIRSTAX (El)D) 0006~ SOl 11X)-2070 419137 05/18/95 0004,44, FIRSTAX (EDD) 00044/, SOl 1~0-20/0 419137 05/18/95 0004,44 FIRSTAX (EDO) 00~ STATE 001-2070 ~19137 05/18/95 0002,~,~ FIRSTAX (EDD) ~ STATE 100-2070 ;137 05/18/95 0004~ FIRSTAX (EDD) O00M~ STATE 165-2070 ~ 05/18/95 00C)44~ FIRSTAX (EDD) 0004/,4 STATE 100-2070 05/18/95 000~,X,~, FIRSTAX (EIX)) 00~.~ STATE 191-2070 4t,,57 05/18/95 O00Z~4 FIRSTAX (El)D) 00~.~ STATE 192-2070 419137 05/18/95 000/,44 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000/:.~ STATE 193-2070 419137 05/18/95 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) O0(u:.~ STATE 280-2070 419137 05/18/95 00044~ FIRSTAX (EDD) OOL~.~ STATE 300-2070 419137 05/18/95 00044,~ FIRSTAX (EDD) ~ STATE 320-2070 419137 05/18/95 O00z~4 FIRSTAX (EDD) 0004~, STATE 5"50-2070 419137 05/18/95 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) OOL'~.~ STATE :~40-2070 31.40 55.50 2,924.07 7~6.77 10.77 520.85 16.76 8.91 /,5.86 36.51 14.60 18.~ 16.59 429155 05/18/95 000283 FIRSTAX (ZRS) REFUND FOR .OVERVIi OF FED TAXES 001-2070 429155 05/18/95 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 001-2070 42~155 05/18/~5 00028~ FIRSTAX (ZRS) 000283 FEDERAL 100-2070 429155 05/18/95 00028~ FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 165-2070 429155 05/18/95 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 190-2070 429155 05/18/95 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 191-2070 429155 05/18/95 000283 FIRSTAX (]RS) - 000283 FEDERAL 192-2070 429155 05/18/95 000283 FIRSTAX (]RS) 000283 FEDERAL 193-2070 429155 05/18/95 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 280-2070 429155 05/18/95 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 300-2070 429155 05/18/95 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 320-2070 429155 05/18/95 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 530-2070 429155 05/18/95 0007.~ FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 3A0-2070 429155 05/18/95 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 RE!)ICARE 001-2070 429155 05/18/95 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 REDICARE 100-2070 429155 05/18/95 000283 FIRSTAX (IM) 000283 NB)ICARE 165-2070 ;155 05/18/95 00028~ FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 NEDICARE 190-2070 }155 05/18/95 000285 FIRSTAX (IRS) 00028~ REDICARE 191-2070 ~5 05/18/95 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 NEDICARE 192-2070 8~./~- 10,7~6.95 ~0,17 ~,M 213 .~ 155 .~ 5~.~ 1~.~ 1&1 .~ 57& .~ 7~1 ,~ 11.~ VOUCHIE2 r' 18/~5 VuuCHER/ CHECK latiNBElt /29155 629155 629155 629155 629155 /.29155 4~82261 23651 Z3652 Z3653 ~3654 23655 23656 ;657 J658 23658 23658 23658 23658 23658 23658 23658 23658 23658 23658 23659 23660 23660 23661 23662 14:55 CHECK DATE 0~/18/95 05118195 05118/95 05118/95 05118195 05118/95 05/18/95 05/18/95 05/18/95 05/18/95 05/18/95 05/18/95 05/18/95 05/18/95 05/18/95 05/18/95 05/18/95 05/18/95 05/18/95 05/18/95 05/18/95 05/18/95 05/18/96 05/18/95 05/18/95 05/18/95 05/18/95 05/18/95 05/18/95 05/18/95 05/18/95 05/18/95 05/18/95 05/18/95 05/18/95 05/18/95 MR 051587 001/,27 000622 001062 000135 000~7 000~7 000~7 900~7 0004~.7 0004~.7 0004,4.7 0004~.7 000~.7 0004,4.7 0004,4.7 000155 001002 051002 001002 001002 M FIRSTAX FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (!lt~) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (E!X}) APRA ALBERTI, JUANA ALVARE'Z, THERESA BANTA ELECTRIC-REFRIGER CALIFORNIA, STATE OF CALVARY CHAPEL'LAKE ELS CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER COl4TRONIX OF HEI4ET COl4TRONZX OF HENET CCIITRORIX OF HENET CONTRONIX OF HBIET COIqTRONIX OF HEHET COlqTRONIX OF HEHET COHTRONZX OF HENET COHTRONIX OF NENET CONTRONIX OF HERET CONTRONIX OF' NEHET Ca4TRORIX OF NEHET COUNTS UNLIMITED CUENCA, VIRGIL G. CUENCA, VIRGIL G. DAVL]N DEFABIIS, SEAN-PAUL NlC FAST SIGNS FAST SIGNS FIRST INTERSTATE BANK C FIRST INTERSTATE BANK C FIRST INTERSTATE BANK C FIRST INTERSTATE BANK C CITY OF TENECIJLA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERILS ITBI DESCRIPTION REFUND FOR OVERUN OF STATE TAX D.SPAGNOLO 14EHBERGNIP RENEMAL RERID FOR TCSD CLASS SIERRA COliF REIlI:ALVAR:5/9-12 ELECT tiORK i CITY HALL RANCHO SPT PRK N.P.D.E.S. PEPJ4 OVRIq4T ON ROCNRENTAL DRIV~ RIVETS FOR CITY SIGNS HAND RADIO HAINT AGREE NAY-JUN HAND RADIO NAINT AGREE NAY-JUN HAND RADIO HAINT AGREE HAY-JUN HAND RADIO NAINT t;GREE NAY-JUN HAND RADIO NAINT AGREE NAY-JUN HAND RADIO 14AINT AGREE NAY-JUN HAND RADIO NAINT AGREE NAY-JUN HAND RADIO HAINT AGREE NAY-JUN HAND RADIO ;tAINT AGREE NAY-JUN HAND RADIO NAINT AGREE NAY-JUN CONTRACT OVERCHARGED BY $2.05 TRAFFIC CENSUS PROGRAH FYW,-95 PAID PRKING CITATIGR TRICE PAID PRKING CITATIGN TUICE AUOIO SERVS FOR COUNCIL NEETIN TCSO INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS PARK SIGNS - SPORTS PARK TAX 5/..75..;,.,:,..;4, 0391 0081RR 5673666A I)~1 0081RR 6666 0391 0172 RB(BOARDS) ~ 0391 0172 RB(BONIDS) 901-2070 901-165-999-5226 190-183-6982 901-162-999-5260 360-199-999-5212 210-190-137-5802 190-1rc-6990 100-164-601-52/,4 190-164-603-5250 100-16/,-601-5250 901-163-999-5250 901-165-999-5250 001 - 171-999-5215 001-170-999-5215 001-162-999-5250 190-180-999-5250 901-110-999-5250 001 - 110-fW-5250 001-110-~-5250 100-1&6-602-54.06 001-170-6055 001-2260 001 - 100-~-5250 1~0-103-~-5330 1~:)-180-~-52~. 1~0-180-f~-5264. 001-100-~-52~0 901-190JFF~-5258 001-160-~-5260 001-160-~-5:";0 ITBt NIXIT ~4.10 /,6.10 1/,..21 57.96 23.~8 68.86 181.50 f7'.50 65.00 32.50 86.90 158.90 251.90 158.00 56.00 2.90 2,00- 320.00 26.80 139.07 132./,.1 6.91 NIXIT 21,512.33 27.01 - '45.90 250.90 14.90 ,,-~,~ 1,085.50 800.90 V(XJCHRE2 CITY OF TENECIA~ "'~""~95 14:55 VQUCI~JJCNEaC REGISTER FOP, ALL PERIGOS PAGE 3 VuuCHER/ CHECK CHECK VEIl)OR VEIl)DR ITBI AI:IX]UNT NUNBER DATE ~ NNIE DESCIIIPTIQB IIUIIER ITEN NIX jUT ANQLIIT 2366~ 05/18/95 O01QO~ FIRST INTERSTATE BNIK C 001-150-999-5250 190-183-&980 25~5 05/18/~5 F]TZPATRICK, BETH 5~73 666/, (X391 0131 AE RERJII) Fell TCSD CLA~S 23666 05/18/95 000177 GLEBNIES OFFICE PRCOUCT OREDIT-HAJI6 FOLDER RETU~ Q01-162-999-5220 ~ 05118195 000177 GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT NISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES; FINANCE OO1-1&O-~F~-5220 ~ 05/18/95 000177 GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT NISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES; FINANCE 001-14~)-~g~-5220 236~6 05/18/95 000177' GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT TYPERVRITER REPAIRS-B&S 001-162-;-5250 75.86 10.00 12.05-. 117.45 59.2~ &8.49 375.56 10.00 213.15 23667 05/18/95 001609 GREATER AULI~ COIFMY, JUNE STOIUtE AI.MII NOIIITGR SEt 34~-199-999-5250 7)668 05/18/95 0003(~ GREEK, JUNE S. CCAC BOARD NTE RE!I4B:J.GREEK 001-120-~g~-52~1 ~ 05/18/95 00036~ GREEK, JUNE S. INAGtNG CUNF REINB:J. GREEK 001-120-~g~-5261 23(~ 05/18/~5 001517 HEALTH & HLI4AN RESGLRCE FJ4PLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRN! O01-150-~g~-5248 35.00 :~.00 3.00 3Z8.25 35.00 23670 05/18/95 000194 I C H A RETIRENENT TiltIS 00019~ DEF CIIIP 001-2080 1,(M3.07 23670 05/18/95 000194 Z C H A RETIREHENT TRUS 00019~ DEF CClIP 100-2080 222.02 23670 05/18/95 000194 I C N A RETIREN~NT TRUS 00019~ DEF ~ 190-2080 475.98 23670 05/18/95 Q00194 Z C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 00019/, DEF CQHP 191-2080 ~.51 ?3670 05/18/95 000194 Z C N A RETIREBENT TRUS 00019~ DEF CCNP 192-2080 75.00 5670 05/18/95 000194 Z C N A RETIRENENT TRUS 00019~ DEF CCNP 198-2080 80.06 ~"~0 05/18/~5 O001~A z c M A RETIREHINT TRUS 0001~ DEF COl4P ::F~0-2080 22.50 2,00~.14 ,_..,rl 05/18/95 J.c. MOBILE HONE REFUND FOR PERNIT FEES 001-162-4285 2167105/18/95 J.C. II081LE HOlE REFUND FOR PERNIT FEES 001-162-4285 150.00 2,/~72 05/18/95 00189~ JOHNSON FENCE COIFNtY 23672 05/18/95 00189~ JOHNSON FENCE COIIPANY /NSTALL BOLLAJ~S 0 ORC EHERG REPAIR:ORC POOL GATE 190-182-f99-5212 190-182-999-5212 23673 05/18/95 000206 KINKO'S OF RIVERSIDE, I MISt PRINTING AND PAPER $UPPLI 1VO-180-f~V-5222 8~.35 23674 05/18/95 O008&V LAWRENCE tIELK RESORT TH EXCURS]ON-SIGNING IN THE RAIN 198-183-99V-5350 393.00 23673 05/18/95 001513 LIBERTY AUTO CENTER TCSD VEHICLE REPAIRS &NAINT 1VO-180-V9V-5214 131.31 131.31 . 23676 05/18/95 000214 LUNCH & STUFF CATERING BOX LUNCH FOR CiTY OF VOORBII 001-100-f"J~-5258 210.00 210.00 236?7 05/18/95 001142 HNtKI~J4 & ASSOCIATES APR PItOGRESS MRK-CALLE PINA BY 100-16~-603-5248 6.25 23678 05/18/95 001384 NINUTBIAN PRESS 1000 BLACK/UlIITE ENVELOPES 001-162-~-5222 23678 05/18/95 00138~ MINUTENAN PRESS 4000 LETTERIEN) PAPER 001-1ZO-V99-SZ22 23678 05/18/95 00138~ NImJTBUm PRESS 4000 LETTERHEN) PAPER 100-164-604-5220 23678 05/18/95 00138~ NINUTEHAN PRESS 4000 LETTERHEAD PAPER 001-144)-999-5222 23678 05/18/95 00138~ NINUTEIIAN PRESS TAX 001-162-999-5ZZ2 23678 05/18/95 001:38~ NINUTENAN PRESS TAX 001-120-999-5222 23678 05/18/95 00138/, NINUTEIIM PRESS TAX 001-1~0-999-5222 23d578 05/18/95 00138~ NINUTEIIAN PRESS TAX 100-16~-60~-5220 88.41 79.4? 6.9O 6.14 6.15 6.14 352,14 ;679 05/18/95 001868 NIYAIIOTO, SUSAN TCSO INSTRUCTOR EARNINSS 190-183-999-5330 179.20 179.20 VOUCHRE2 18/95 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUIIER 23681 23685 23685 ;?.3685 23685 23685 23685 23685 23685 23687 23687 I687 16:55 CHECK DATE 05118/95 05/18/95 05118195 05/18/95 05/18/95 05/18/95 05/18/95 05/18/95 05/18/95 05/18/95 05/18/95 05/18/95 05/18/95 05/18/95 05/18/95 05/18/95 05/18/95 05/18/95 05/18/95 05/18/95 05/18/95 05/18/95 05118195 05/18/95 05/18/95 05/18/95 05/18/95 05/18/95 05/18/95 05/18/95 05/18/95 05/18/95 05/18/95 05/18/95 05/18/95 05/18/95 05/18/95 05/18/95 05/18/95 05/18/95 05/18/95 05/18/95 05/18/95 NLIIER OO1691 00024,6 0002~ 0002~ 0002~ 0~2~ 0002~ 0002~& 0002~ 0002~ 0~2~ ~0266 ~02~ 0002~ 000~6 0002~ 0002~ 0002~ 0002~ 0002~ 0~2~ 0~2~ 0002~ 0002~ 0002~ 0002~ 000269 I)01)269 000269 ~269 000269 000249 001695 001695 0130967 0000967 0009~7 M !IXITELEONE EXCAVATING PEN LAIdBENCK & GRAY CITY OF TBICULA VOIJCIERIClECK REGISTER FOR ALL PER!00S ITBI DESCRIPTION 7 HRS BIJM)E MORK ON STORI4 'DAI4A SISTER CITY TEA EEFIESIIINT REFUND FON TCSD CLASS OLD TOMN LOT APPRAISAL SEItVS PERS (BIPLOYEES' NiTlEE PERS (BIPLOYEES' IIETIEE PERS (E!fLOYEES' IIL=TIEE 000~ PERS (B4PLOYEES' RETIRE 0002&6 PERS (EHPLOYEES' RETIEE 0002~6 PERS CEHPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS (B4PLOYEES' RETIRE 000266 PERS (EHPLOYEES' RETIRE 0002/,6 PERS CEHPLOYEES' RETIRE 000266 PERS CENPLOYEES' RETIRE 0002/,6 PERS CEI4PLOYEES' RETIRE 000266 PERS CEI4PLOYEES' RETIRE 0002/,6 PERS (ENPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EI4PLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (ENPLOYEES' RETIRE 0002~6 PERS (E!qPLOYEES, RETIRE 000266 PER$ (ENPLOYEE$' RETIRE 000246 PERS (EI4PLOYEES' EETIRE 000266 PERS (E!4PLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS (EI4PLOYEE$' RETIRE PERS (EHPLOYEES' RETIRE 000266 PERS (EI4PLOYEES' RETIRE 0002~6 PERS (EI4PLOYEES' RETIRE 0002/,6 PERS (EI4PLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EI4PLOYEES' RETIRE PETTY CASH PETTY PETTY CASH PETTY PETTY CASH PETTY PETTY CASH PETTY PETTY CASH PETTY PETTY CASH PETTY PETTY CASH PETTY PETTY CASH PETTY PRO'CIVIL ENGINEERING, PRO-CIVIL ENGINEERING, RNICHO BELL BLUEPRINT C RANCHOBELL BLUEPRINT C RANClIO BELL BLUEPRINT C RANClIO CALIFORNIA MATER PER IREDE PERS EET PERS PET PERS PET PERS EET PERS EET PERS PET PERS RET PERS RET PERS EET PERS RET PERS EET PERS EET SURVIVOR SURVIVOR SURVIVOR SURVIVOR SURVIVOR SURVIVOR SURVIVOR SURVIVOR SURVIVOR SURVIVOR SURVIVOR SURVIVOR CASH EEIIIURSE!4ENT CASH REI!4BURSB4ENT CASH REINBIJRSB4ENT CASH REII4BURSENENT CASH EE!I4BURSEEENT CASH REINBURSERENT CASH RE!I4BURSEHENT CASH REINBURSERENT APR 95 PROGRESS Iq4T-PALA RD RETENTION WH ]NV 1269 BLUEPRINTS FOR VILCOTT CORR PJ ~6" X 500' BOND ROLL'S BLUEPRINTS FOR NORAGA RD STOP-.q MATER SSRVS 3/23-4~6/95 ACC(IMT 100-16&-601-S&02 190-183-999-5370 190-183-6982 280-1~j.;-~-5250 001-2130 001 -Z$~0 100-2590 165-2390 190-2390 191 192-2390 193-2390 320-2390 330-239O 340-2390 001-2390 100-2390 165-2390 190-2390 191 -Z590 195-2390 3000-2300 330-23~0 340- 2300 210-165-652-580~ 210-2035 210-165-637-5806 330- lf~4~-5220 210-165-625-5802 100-180-999-5260 ITBI 4~,96 63.06 12,4~6.09 2,310.23 76.&6 2,796.43 89.91 99.78 319.&5 239.71 78.01 2~8.21 315.60 56.19 10.22 13.4~ 1.44 2.00 SO.O0 44.05 12.S4 6.00 6.31 66.76 7.50 23,460.3t 2,616.37' 108.09 133.05 8.53 PAE6 19,282;50 215.16 21.043.g6 VOUCHEE2 '~Y'~ 14:55 CITY OF TBL:aX.A VOUCIEIUaECK REG!VTBt FOR ALL P~tlOOS PAGE VuuCHER/ CHECK CHECK VEI)QR NUIIER DATE IIJIER M ACCOUNT litER ITBQ NeUNT NeWft' 05/18/95 (X)02~ 05/18/95 000262 23689 05118/95 000426 27,689 05118/95 000426 23689 05/18/95 ~ 27,689 05118/95 000426 RNICJl0 CALIFOIWIA liTER RNICHO CALIFORNIA MATER RANClIO INOUSTRIAL SIJPPL RANClIO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL RANClIO II)USTRIAL ~PPL RANCHO IIXJSTRIAL ~JzPL 2:r~90 05/18/95 001279 RANClIO REWS, INC. 27)691 05/18/95 000353 2369Z 05/18/~5 000418 23693 05/18/95 001605 05118/95 001942 RIVERSIDE CO. AUDITOR RIVERSIDE (3). CLERK & R RIVERSIDE CO. CLERK C~U S C SIGNS AKA: KING, ST biTER HERVS 3/23-4/24/95 EATER SERVS 3~-4~4~ JANITORIN. SUPPLIES i CITY HAL JNIITORIAL ~UPPLIES 6 SR CNTR JNIITORIAL ~UPPLIES i ~R ORTR JANITORIAL SlJPPLIE~ I OR CNTR SPRING A~URTIC JqW6RANAD ERAF PHT FY 93-5(PRPTY TAX $1ii APERTURE CARDS DUPLICATES RANCHO VISTA/NIRA LQI4A EXCENPT PU8LIC NOTICE PROPERTY SIGNS 191-180-999-5240 193-180-999-52/,0 3&0-199-999-5212 190-181-999-5212 190-181-999-5212 190-181-999-5212 190-180-999-5ZS& M0-199;999-5245 001-163-999-5220 210-1~-656-5802 001 - 161-999-5256 23695 05/18/95 000537 $OUI'HERN CALIF BISON - 52-77-899-262~-01 ELECT $ERV$ 193-180-999-5244) 2:$695 05/18/95 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF BISON - 56-77-755-0157-01 ELECT SERV$ 191-180-999-531~ ~3695 05/18/95 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON - 56-77-755-0169-01 ELECT $ERV$ 191-180-999-5319 /"'% 05/18/95 OOO375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPIION 909 202-4769 JS 001-100-999-5208 5 05/18/95 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 909 202-4204 KL OO1-100-999-5208 ,..,~96 05/18/95 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 909 202-4762 RP OO1-100-~9-5208 2.',',',',',',',','T~96 05/18/95 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPIION 909 202-6758 RR OO1-100-~-5208 23696 05/18/95 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 909 202-4761SIq OO1-100-999-5208 23696 05/18/95 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPIION 909 205-4070 NJII 001-110-999-5208 ?.3696 05/18/95 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 909 202-4770 RB 001-110-999-5208 23696 05/18/95 000:375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 909 202-4757 JG 001-120-999-5208 23696 05/18/95 000:375 SOUTHERN CAt. IF TELEPIION 909 205-7826 OR 081-1&0-999-5208 23696 05/18/95 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 909 202-4759 TE 081-162-999-5208 23696 05/18/95 000:375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHOR 909 202-476~ BB-PW BLAZER 108-164-601-5208 23696 05/18/95 000:375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 909 202-4765 BB 100-t64-601-5208 23696 05/18/95 000:375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 909 202-4760 JN 100-164-603-5208 23696 05/18/95 000:375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 909206-0992811 190-180-999-5208 23696 05/18/95 000:375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 909 202-4755 CITY VAN 190-180-999-5208 64.01 683,16 145.53 19.~0 11.62 ~6.55 129.84, 150,109.19 5.00 78.08 195.08 /,8.13 215.79 57.01 56.~8 63.12 108.5:3 81 203.87 164.61 4~,22 47.06 56./2 38.12 22Llo 129.64 i50,109.19 5.Q0 78.00 195.00 320,93 1,216.52 23697 05/18/95 000291 $PEE DEE OIL CHANGE & T CITY NANAHER VEHICLE REPAIRS OO1-110-~9-5216 20.~9 20.V9 23698 05/18/95 001678 STEPHENSON. KATIE J. MILEAGE HEIMB 001-120-999-5250 51.90 51.90 23699 05/18/95 001417 STERLING. $TEVEN 23700 05/18/95 000521 STEWART, BRUCE M. BOOT HEIMBURSEMENT 190-180-999-5243 APR 95 PROF SERVS-RIDHE PRK DR 001-162-999-5250 43.07 140 .~ 23701 05/18/95 001497 T R W. IHC.'INFORNATIOR RDA CREDIT REPORTS FOR LOANS ;702 05/18/95 O01W~ TF. MEClJLA BIPLOYERS ADVZ G YATES YRLY ItEllERSHIP 280-199-~-5250 081 - 150-999- 5226 50.OO 25.OO 50.OO 25.OO /,--~3 05/18/95 TEI~CULA UNITED HETHODI SECURITY DEPOSIT REFUND 190-2900 lOO.OO lOO.OO VCXJCHRE2 18/95 23705 23707 23707 37O9 S709 _5709 23710 23710 23710 23710 23710 23711 23711 23711 23711 23711 23712 23713 23713 23714 23714 1~:55 CHECK DATE 05118195 O5118195 05118195 05118195 05/18/~5 05118/95 05118195 05118/95 05/18/~5 05/18/95 05/18/95 05/18/95 05/18/95 05/18/~5 05/18/~5 05/18/~5 05/18/f5 05/18/95 05/18/~5 05/18/95 05/18/95 05/18/95 05/18/95 05/18/95 05/18/95 05/18/95 05/18/95 05/18/95 05/18/~5 05/18/95 05/18/95 05/18/95 05/18/95 05/18/~5 NUlIER 000320 000)Z0 000S20 000,)20 000~.0 0OO320 00117~ 001179 001065 001065 001065 001065 0010~5 001065 000)8~ 000389 000389 000~25 000325 000325 000325 000)25 000)26 000326 000)26 000326 000326 000339 OO0))8 0005'38 000:~.0 000~0 M TBIECULAVLLY LITTLE LE TOSH, HELEN TiE CENTER STATIONERS TOMlIE GENTERSTATIOERS TME CElli~.k STATIONERS TME CEltfElt STATIONERS TOIIE CENTER STATIONERS TOIIE CENTER STATIONERS TREBOR (X)NPANY INC., TH TREBOR CCllPANY INC., TH U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C U S C N/PEBSCO (DEF. C U S C M/PEBSO0 (DEF. C U S C H/PEBSCO (DEF. C U S C N/PEBSCO (DEF. C U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C U S C N/PEBSCO (ONRA) U S C N/PEBSCO U S C n/PEBSO0 (O eRA) UNITED UAY OF THE INLAN UNITED UAY OF THE INLAN UNITED HAY OF TNE INLAR UNITED HAY OF THE INLAId UNITED HAY OF THE INLAN UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE, UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE, UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE, UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE, UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE, tIEST PUBLISHING COMPANY UESTUN, RETA ~ESTUN, RETA UHITE CAP INDUSTRIES, I MIITE CAP INDUSTRIES, I CITY OF I'BECULA VOUCHBt/CIECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERICI)S ITEN DEQ3tIPTION SECLIRITY DEPOSIT RERID REFUI) FOR TC$O CLASS OFFICE SUPPLIES:PUADIIIN OFFICE SUPPLIES:PVNX41N OFFICE SUPPLIES:PMNNIIN OFFICE SUPPLIESsLNID DEVEL OFFICE SUPPLIES:LAND DEVEL OFFICE $UPPLIES:PUANIIN BARRICADES:STENCILED ON ROTTON TAX 001065 DEF CONP 001065 DEF COle 001065 DEF COle 001065 DEF CONP 001065 DEF ImP 001065 DEF CONP 000389 PT RETIR 000389 PT RETIR 000::389 PT RETIR OOO323 ~ OOO325 UN OOO325 Ug O003Z5 UN 0OO)25 UN UNIFORNS FOR PV HAINT CEBIS UNIFORN HAlfiT FOR TCSO CREM$ FLOOR NAT RENTAL 0 CITY HALL FLOOR NAT RENTAL i CEC FLOOR NAT RENTAL 0 SIt CNTR PUBLICATIUN:CA COOES SIERRA CONF RENIB:tlESTN:5/9-12 SIERRA COtIF RENIB:gESTN:5/9-12 ORANGE NANKING PAINT TAX NLIIER 190-18~-6982 lo0-1~4-~0~-5220 lo0-16~-604-5220 lo0-16A-60&-5220 001 - 16~-999-5220 'O01-163-~FF,%5220 lo0-16&-604,-5220 100-1~-601-5218 lo0-16~-601-5218 001-2080 lo0-2080 1~0-2080 )00-2080 320-2080 )&0-2080 001-21(:O lo0-21~0 190-21~0 001-2120 100-2120 165-2120 1~)-2120 280-2120 lo0-164-eO1-524~ 1~0-180-;-5243 34,0-1W-;-5230 1~0-182-;-5230 1~0-181-fF?-5250 001 - 120-;- 5228 001-1&.0-;-5261 001-162-999-5261 100-1(~4-d~-524.2 lo0-164.-~03-5242 ITEN AN0UNT lo0.O0 20.00 8AO .O0 65.10 2,165.58 132.23 27"1 .SO 5.O0 312.50 50.O0 235 .~6 60.00 616.O0 38./~5 10.05 .75 17.O0 .75 23.50 20.85 3,4,.50 :58.23 20.O4. 69.65 97.50 31.80 39.82 3.09 M 6 MOIJIT lo0.O0 986,23 2,r~,.81 137.12 ' 69.65 129.)0 /~2.91 TOTAL CHECKS 245,305.82 15:37 CITY OF TENECULA VaN:HER/CHECK REGISTER Felt ALL PEelIS PAGE FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 100 GAS TAX FUND 165 RDA DEV- LOll/IX) SET A~ZDE 190 CaltlNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 210 CAPITAL ]IIPROVENENT PROJ FUND 280 REDEVELOPPENT AGENCY - C]P 300 INSURANCE FUND 320 INFORIIATION $YSTENS 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 3AO FACILITIES TOTAL 16,9/,6.13 5,928.91 157.59 14,11Q.SO 823.62 11.11 3,658.95 1,853o02 8,676.35 1,611.96 7,314.15 828.75 62,218.53 VOUCHRE2 vLAJCHER/ CHECK: Nt. JHBER 23527 23715 23716 23717 23721 23722 23?2.3 23?26 23?26 23?26 ~3726 3?2? ~3728 23?29 23730 23733 23?33 23733 3?35 3736 15:37 CHECK DATE 05/08/95 05119195 05119/95 05126195 05125195 05125195 05125195 05/25/95 05125/95 05125195 05/25/~5 05/25/95 05/25/95 05/25/95 05/25/95 05/25/95 05/25/95 05/25/95 05125195 05125195 05125195 05125195 05/25/95 05/Z5/95 05125195 05125195 05125195 05125195 05/25/95 05125195 ',lEe VF.I~)CXt NIMBER NN4E QOQ233 POSTI4ASTER 0014.00 NARRIOTT HOTEL - SAN FR 001290 HEYER. JOHN 001695 NATIQILe. L FLO(X) INSURNIC 0009/,0 4,N6XPERT SYSTEHS 001625 A BETTER CONFERENCE, IN 001104. A R N A INTERNATIONAL 0018~5 A T & T - VAN NUYS 0018~5 A T & T - VAN llUYS A,A.R,P, 001086 RDCO EQUIIqqENT SALES 001086 RDCO EQUIPIENT SALES 001625 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR CORP. ALVAADO, JOHN 000767 HRICAN PLANNING ASSOC 0013~6 AN~RICAN PLANNING ASSOC 000101 APPLE ONE, INC. 000101 APPLE ONE, INC. 000101 APPLE ONE, INC. 000101 APPLE ONE, INC. 0004.27 · 0004,27 000427 000~27 000427 000427 ARTESIA IHPLEMENT, INC. ARTESIA IHPLEHENT, INC. ARTESIA ]FIPLEHENT, INC. ARTESIA IIIPLENENT, INC. ANTESIA INPLENENT, INC. ANTESIA INPLEHENT, INC. BANTA ELECTRZC-REFRIGER BANTA ELECTRIC-REFRIGER BANTA ELECTRIC-REFRIGER BEAL, KELLI BERRY, CAROLYN 00012~ MIlE WlLLIN4S & SOltENS CITY OF TBIECULA VOUCHER/CIECK HE~I~IR FOIl ALL PERIII)S ITE!4 DESCRIPTIOH BULK NAIL:;ND REQUEST FOIl BL BIO-TECH CONF:HOTEL:J.II[YER BIO-TECH COlIF CASH ADVAN:!4EYER HYDROLIC STUOY INFOI~I IRON FEll ACCCI. IT NLI4BER 001 - 140-999-5250 001 - 161-999-5238 001-161-999-5258 280-199-999-5250 ACCIDENT HE-CONSTItUCTIOH SOFT~ 001-1/'0-~J~-5221 TELEPHONE CONF CALL:NAY 12 J.GREEK YRLY NENBERSHIP DUES 730 375 7109 001 LONG DIST SEA 730 375 7110 001 TH SECURITY DEPOSIT REFUND REPLACE BARTELL GRINDER TAX 6015202 TH REFUND FOR TCND CLASS OO1 - 110-~-5208 001-120-~-5226 320-1~-9~-5208 3Z0-1W-gW-SZ08 190-2900 I00-1(~.-~01-54.02 100-1(~-601-5602 320 - 1 ~ - ~- 5208 1~0-18~-6~82 D.UBNOSKE NENliERSHIP 7/95-6/~6 001-161-999-5226 AICP STUDY SE~IOH:HOGAN&FAGAN QQ1-161-999-57.61 TEI4P HELP WE 3125 CHESHZER, H TEI4P HELP WE 3125 CHESHZER,M. TEHP HELP ~/E 6/1 CHESHIER,HAR TE!IP HELP ~/E 5/6 HEER 2 TIRES FOR SKIP LOADER 2 HAS LABOR FOR MOUNT TIRES 2 TIRE TUBES FRE I GHT TAX REPAIR & NAINT OF TCSO TRACTOR CK A/D UNITS IN ORC GANE LIGHTS FOR LANDSCAPING i CRC INSTALL LIGHT OVA CRC SIGN SIERRA COliF REINB:BEAL:5/11-12 REFUli) FOR TCSD CLASS APR 95 LEGAL SERVS 190-180-~-5118 1~0-1BU-~-5118 1~0-180-~-5118 2BU-1~-~-5Z50 100-1~-601-5216 100-166-601-5216 100-1(~.-601-5216 100-1~.-~01-5216 100-1~-601-5216 1~0-180-~-5216 1~-1~-~-5250 1~-1~-~-5250 1~-1E-~-5250 001-161 -~-5261 lf0-18~-6982 001-130-~-52~ ITEII 132,r/ Z00,00 200.00: 165.12 110.71 61.65 120.00 5.15 5.00 100.00 867.25 67.21 52.7O 20.00 167.00 60.00 1~ .~8 161 .~0 602.10 1~8.00 31 .~6 2.76 69.10 3O3.12 208.50 112.50 217.7O 329.51 6O.QQ 877.28 PAGE I 1~2,r/ zoo.oo 2oo.oo 165.12 11o.71 61 ,~5 lzo,oo lo,15 loo.oo 167.oo 6o,oo (~7.58 1,12~.56 329,51 V~UCHREZ "~'~95 15:37 CITY OF I'B~CULA VQUCIIER/CIECK REGISTEIt ~ ALL PERIODS PAGE2 vuuCHER/ CHECK CHECK .~"NDOR !IIMBER DATE i M ITUM DESCRIPTION Z5'/38 05125195 000126 237'58 05125195 000126 23758 05125195 000126 237'~8 05125195 000126 23738 05125195 000126 237'~8 05/25/95 000126 237"~ 05/25/95 000126 233738 05/25/95 000126 74738 05125195 000126 23738 05/23/95 000126 23738 05125/95 000126 23738 05/25/95 000126 23738 05/25/95 000126 23738 05/25/95 000126 ~7'~ 05/Z5/95 000126 ~ 05/25/95 001590 23740 05/25/95 000950 23740 05/25/95 000950 CADOY INNHIllS CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE IM CALIFONIIA LANDSCAPE Ik CALIFQRIIIA LNI)ICAPE NA CAI. IFQIUIIA LANDffi NA CALIFORNIA LNI)SCAPE NA CALIFORNIA LANDSCkDE HA CALIFQRIIIA LANI)SCN~ HA CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE HA CALIFORNIA LAI)$CAPE HA CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE HA CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE HA CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE HA CAL]FORN]A lANDSCAPE HA CALIFONIIA LANDSCAPE HA CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE HA CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE HA CALIFOIIIA LANDSCAPE HA CALIFORNIA L/INDSCAPE HA CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE HA CALIFORNIA LNIDSCAPE HA CALIFORNIA REDEVELOPlIEN CALIFORNIAN, INC.- DISP CALIFORNIAN~ INC.- DZSP 23741 05/25/95 CALVARY CHAPEL OF NURR 237/,1 05/25/95 CALVARY CHAPEL OF INRR JUt. &IN PARN)E CQIIITTEE PIN R.C. ie IEDIANSC3180504~) VETENVIS PRK REPAIRS(318050602 LABOR (IRRIGATIOR TECH) TREE ItENOVAL (EUCALYPTUS) EACKFILL SINK HOLE LCI~ LINDA PRK HAINT(318050~05 LOIER HEADS AND VALVE B~KES K.HINTERGARDT HAINTC)1805(X073 PALOIM DEL SOL PEK(31805044333 UPRIGHT AND SECURE PALIq TREES iNSTALL PiPE V/CLO TH(318051X12 $R CNTER LDSCPE HAINT & REPAIR TREE TRIllING I)CKT(318051XlO) PLANTS $PT PEK()18050~133 15 GAL. HEDESTO ASH 15 GAL. PURPLE LEAF PLLIN SANTIAGO FED ABATE(318051X113 RF. NI)VE DEBRISAEEDS(318050611 ) REPAIR PiPE IN PLANTER 6 ORC LCN & 1400 HOUSING CONF:HEYER EASTER EGG HUNT AD Pt, I CONSTRUCTION UN)ATES-CIP PT RENTAL REFUND -CAIICELLATI RENTAL REFUND -CANCELLATI 190-180-f"F~-5~01 191-180-999-5&15 190-180-f"je-5415 190-180-999-5&15 190-180-999-54,15 190-180-~-5~15 190-180-~-5615 190-180-999-5~15 190-180-999-54,15 190-180-999-5&15 190-180-999-5~15 190-180-999-.~15 190-180-999-5615 190-181-999-5~15 193-180-999-5~15 190-180-999-5212 190-180-999-5212 190-180-999-5212 100-16~-60t-.~02 100-16/,-601-5/,02 190-182-999-.~15 165-199-999-5261 190-180-999-5256 001-165-999-525~ 190-18~-&990 20,00 728.00 18.90 35.00 25.00 :30.00 315.Q0 125.00 120.00 9~.00 90.00 281.25 50.00 128.0~ 555.00 170.00 125.00 656.7'8 198.60 60.00 100.00 3,5~.~ 125.00 ~5 160.00 23762 05/25/95 CALVARY CHAPEL OF NURRZ SECURITY DEPOSIT REFUND 23?43 05/25/95 000131 CARL MARREN & CO., INC. COFFNNI,RORERT FOR SARA 719/9~ 23743 05/25/95 000131 CARL MNtREN & CO., INC. HILL, CONNiE 11101/90 23743 05/25/95 000131 CARL MARREN &CO., INC. VARELA, VICTOR 0/,110194, 23743 05/25/95 000131 CARL MRRREN & CO., INC. GTE, 12/14/94, 237U, 05/25/95 000135 CENTRAL CITIES SIGN $ER 28" TEAFF]C CONES 237/,/, 05/25/95 000135 CENTRAL CITIES SIGN EER 18" TRAFFIC CONES WSTENCIL 237z,4 05/25/95 000135 CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER TAX 25745 05125195 001197 CHOCOLATE FLORIST, THE CITY CLERKS ASSOC. OF C 05125195 000912 GIFTS FOR SISTER CITY FY 95-96YRLYI4BIERSHZPDUES 300-199-999-5205 300-199-999-5205 300-199-999-5205 300-199-999-5205 100-16~-601-5218 100-16~-601-5218 100-164-601-5218 001 - 100-999-5258 O01 - 120-999-5226 100.00 258.13 :~39 2/0,88 144.00 675.00 121.25 61.71 126.75 123.00 100.00 1,012.t4 857.96 124,.75 125.00 23747 05125195 001Z75 COI!PUSERVE, INC. APR USAlIE CHARHE 320-199-999-5228 18.0~ 18.03 37/,8 05/25/95 0016::$4 COUCH, COLETTE TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNING /-"~9 05/25/95 001535 CREEKSIDE TEXACO, INC. PVVEHICLE HAINT & REPAIRS 190-183-999-5:g0 001-165-999-5216 280.00 lf7.12 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TBIECULA 15/95 15:37 ViXr. HER/ClEaC REGISTER FOR ALL PERICl)S PA~E3 vuuCHER/ CHEClC CHECK VEII)(XI V~II)OR iTEM lttlIBER DATE IIJMBER HAME DESCRIPTION IlLtIBER 237/,9 05/25/95 Q01535 CREEDSDE TEXMX), INC. VEHICLE NAZm. - PWLZC uomcs 001-165-999-521/, 237/,9 05/25/95 001535 CREEKSIDE TEXA(X), INC. PW VEHICLE BIBIT & REPAIRS 23750 05/25/95 D C E INIX2RPQRATED IIXJSE NiTT FCR CARPAL TUIIIEL 320-199-999-5220 25751 o5/25/95 001029 DATAQUZaC, INC. mY NTHY CO-RON IX~TA CHARdE 320-199-999-5250 25752 05/25/95 000155 DAVLIN PLAN COIl TAPING mY 15, 95 001-161-999-5250 23752 05/25/95 000155 DAVLIN ALl)tO TAPING OF COUNCIL NTG . 001-100-999-5250 23753 05/25/95 DEPT OF PUBLIC POLICY PUB:INX/SUPERST(XZE SPRAWL-COle4 001-161:999-5228 ITEN NIOLIT 107.0~ 72.96 71.85 153.34 16.00 CNEaC AMQUIff 953.3~ 16.00 2375A 05/25/95 001675 DIVERSIFIED TENIN3RARY S TBIP HELP U/E 5/07 CIJRINGA 001-161-999-5118 23754 05/25/95 001673 DIVERSIFIED TEMPORARY S TF, XP HELP W/E 5/1/, CURINCA 001-161-999-5118 23755 05/25/95 ECONOHICR PRESS, INC. 5/95-5/96 SUBSCRIPTION dERVS 001-120-999-5228 361.20 320.5? 50.96 23756 05/25/95 000161 EDEN SYSTEMS, INC. DIRECT DEPOSIT UPDATE - 5 HRS. 320-199-999-5211 /,95.00 495.00 25757 05/25/95 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE RANCHOHIGHLDS LDSCP IMPROVEHE 195-180-999-5/.15 23757 05/25/95 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE UDCRST CTRY LANDSCP IMPROVEHEN 195-180-999-5615 3757 05/25/95 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE PRESLEY SLOPE LDSCP IHPROVEI4EN 193-180-999-5~15 3757 05/25/95 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE PERFONHANCE DEFICIENCIES 193-180-999-5/.15 23758 05/25/95 001313 FA~, HATTHEW REINB FON AICP STUDY ~SE 001-161-999-5261 23759 05/25/95 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. EXPRESS elL SERVICES 100-180-999-5230 23739 05/25/95 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. EXPRESS HAIL SERVICES 280-199-999-5230 23759 05/25/95 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. EXPRESS HAIL SERVICES 001-120-999-5230 23739 05/25/95 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. EXPRESS HAIL SERViCES 001-161-999-5230 ~.00 10.00 13.50 ,,.dO 90.25 23760 05/25/95 001135 FIRST CARE INDUSTRIAL N NEV HIRE SPINE X-RAY & DRUG TE 001-150-~-52/.8 ~0.00 23761 05/25/95 000170 FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY, CALEIIDAR REFILLS FOR PLANNER 23761 05/25/95 000170 FRANKLIN QUEST CCX4PANY, PAGEFINDER & CAL REFILLS 100-164-60~-5220 001-1/.0-999-5220 /,9.40 38.20 87.60 23762 05/25/95 001093 FRAZEE PAINT 23762 05/25/95 001093 FRAZEE PAINT 5 CAL RECYCLED GRAFFITI PAINT 100-164-601-5218 TAX 100-164-601-5218 42.41 23763 05/25/95 000993 FREEDa4 COFFEE, INC. COFFEE SIJPPLIES FOR CiTY HALL 3/.0'199-999'5250 177.78 177,78 23764 05/25/95 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYH ~ 181-1123 SEN 320-199-~-5200 23764 05/25/95 00018~ G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYH 909 69~-1993 dEN USAdE 320-199-999-5208 23764 05/25/95 000184 G T E CALZFONNIA - PAYI4 909 695-3564 CITY HALL ALARI4 · 320-199-999-5208 23764 05/25/95 00018~ G T E CALIFORNIA - PAY!4 909 699-8632 GEN USAdE 320-199-999-5208 .~5.13 1,077.36 52.01 27.4,0 1,701.90 23?65 05/25/95 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRCOIJCT HISC OFFICE SI,FPLZES 001-110-~-5220 23765 05/25/95 OOO177 GLENNZES OFFICE PRODUCT MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES B & S 001-162-999-5220 3765 05/25/95 O00177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT MlSC OFFICE SUPPLIES; FINANCE 001-140-999-5220 3765 05/25/95 0O0177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-140-999-5220 3765 05/23/95 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PROOUCT MISCOFFICE SIJPPLIES 001-1/*0-f~-5220 /,9.58 221.76 10.60 43.70 VOUCHRE2 vuuCHER/ CHECk:: NINBER 23765 Z5765 25765 23765 Z5765 23765 ;2:5766 23766 Z5766 23766 ;23766 23767 2J767 23767 23767 23768 3769 23776 3780 15:37 CHECK DATE 05125/95 05125195 05125/95 05125195 05/7.5195 05125195 05125195 05/25/95 05/25/95 05/25/95 05125195 05/25/95 05/25/95 05125195 05125195 05/25/95 05/25/95 05/25/95 05/25/95 05/25/95 05/25/95 05/25/95 05/25/95 05/25/95 05/25/95 05/25/95 05/25/95 05125195 05/25/95 05/25/95 05125195 05/25/95 05/25/95 05/25/95 05125195 VilXXt IMRBER 000177 000177 000177 000177 000177 000177 000192 000192 000192 000192 000192 000178 000178 000178 000963 001186 000860 0013/,9 001:3~9 000206 000206 000206 000206 000206 000209 00153~ 001513 000996 000214 001865 001501 VF.m)CI M GLEIIIES OFFIC~ PROOUCT GI..EWIIES OFFICE PR(X)UCT GLElilIIES OFFIr'J: PI~I)UCT GLENNIES OFFICE PRQXlCT GLENNIES OFFICE PR(XXJCT GLENNIES OFFICE PR(XXJCT GLOBAL COLOR SUPPLIE GLOBAL CCI4PUTER $UPPLIE GLOBAL CDNPUTER SUPPLIE GLOBAL CCleKJTER SUPPLIE GLOBAL CONPUTER SUPPLIE GOLDEN STATE TRADING GO GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO GOLDEN STATE TRADING GO GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO GOLLOGLY, CHARLYN HOGAN, DAVID HSIEH, LOUISA IRUIN, JOHN JOCHIM, LORI ICANE, BALLNER & BERKNAN KANE, BALLHER & BERIOIAN KZNKC)'S OF RIVERSIDE, KINKO'S OF RIVERSIDE, KINKO'S OF RIVERSIDE, KINKO;S OF RIVERSIDE, K]NKO~S OF RIVERSIDE, L & N FERTILIZER, INC. LA MASTERS OF FINE TRAV LIBERTY AUTO CENTER LOCAL GOVERNMENT PUBLIC LUNCH & STUFF CATERING M C I TELECOHIIMZCATION 14ARINA CONTRACTORS, ]NC CITY OF TBaCULA VOI, FJIER/CNECK REGISTER FOlt ALL PeRIl:lOS ITEN DESCItIPTIOR NISC OFFICE IUPPLIB; FINANCE NISC OFFICE StJPPLIB OFFICE SUPPLIES TAX HIS(: OFFICE SIJPPLIB NISC OFFICE SUPPLIES 314 1/& DATA TAPE PRINTER STAM) ALPR ALQ RIBBON FREIGHT TAX Cl)ROR DRIVE TRIDENT VQA VIDEO CARD IDE i/0 VISA ~ FREIGHT TAX REFUND FOR TCSD CLASS REII4B FOR AICP STUDY COURSE REFUND FOR TCSD CLASS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARN]NSS TCSO INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS (REISSUE CK)JAN LEGAL SERVE-m: (REISSUE CK)FEB 95 LEGAL SERVS PRINTING COPIES FOR PLANNING CORI41SSION PRINTING AND PAPER NEEDS PRINTING AND PAPER NEEDS PRINTING AND PAPER NEEDS LANDSCAPE EOU]P PARTS & REPAIR LEGISLATIVE CONF:AIRFARE:HJM REPAIR TRK IN93-018 RTINIOR PA PUB:CALIF I. JUID USE 2d95 SUPP CATERING FOR CITY COI,IIICIL NEET LONG DISTANCE SERV FOR APR COdI1-LONA LIEDA PRK-MAY PffiX3SS NUIIER 001-1&0-999-5220 GO1-120-999-5220 GO1-120-999-5220 GO1-120-999-5220 GO1-1&0-999-5220 GO1-1&0-999-5220 320-1~-999-5~1 320-1~-999-5~1 320-1~-999-5~1 3Z0-1~999-5~1 3~-1~-999-5~1 3~-1~-999-5~1 3~-1~-999-5~1 3~-1~-999-5~1 320-1~-999-5~1 320-1~-999-5~1 190-183-4.9e2 001 - 161-999-5261 190-183-4982 190-183-999-5330 190-183-999-5330 ZBO-199-999-5Z46 280-199-999-5246 280-1~-999-5222 GO1-161-999-52S0 1~-1~-999-5222 1~-1~-999-57.22 1~-1~-999-527.?. 190-180-999-5242 001-110-999-5258 001-163-999-5214 001 - 100-999-5728 001-100-999-5Z60 320-199-999-5208 210-190-134- 580~ ZTEN ANOtJNT 5~.73 4~.38 14.96 1.16 33.33 3.03 91.25 75.90 52.74 12.95 17.55 530.00 300.OO 52.OO 15.OO 68.36 35.OO 35 .OO 35 .OO 324.80 672.OO 3,916.95 3,8~7.83 ~25 I&9.OO 3Z7.05 89.52 OO.OO 1 ,Z31.85 185 PAGE4 NIOUNT 250.39 965 .:56 )S.OO 35 .OO 35 .OO 324,.80 672.OO 7 , 76~ . 78 1,59~ .83 '~,25.26 I&9.OO 3Z7.05 89.52 80.00 1,231.85 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TB!I3JLA "'25/~ 15:37 VOUCHEItlCHED( lEGlITER FOR ALL PIllORS PAGE VUUCHER/ CHECK CHECI( VEIl)OR VEIl)OR ITBI ACCOLNT NUMBER DATE ~R ~ DESCltlPTIOR IBJ46ER ITB4 aT AJ~ 2378105/25/95 001501 HARINA C~iiTUCTORS, INC RETENTION V/H ON INVI C(Xll 210-2035 23782 00/25/~5 001/~0 NATROR, ALOHA TCSD INSTRUCTOR EAItNINGS 1~)-183-'ag-S330 23783 05/25/~5 001~05 REYERS, DAVID HILLIN4 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 1~0-183-g~-5330 23786 00/25/~5 000228 140BIL, INC. FLEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 001-163-;-526) 2378~ 05/25~5 000228 MOBIL, INC. FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 23785 05/25/95 1406ILE ClL~FT MOBILE IKI4E PRIC PERNIT-REFUND 001-162-6285 .- 237'86 05125195 001892 NOeILE NOOULAR FIRE MODULAR UNIT NAY RENTAL 001-171-999-5670 23?86 05/25/95 O01892 NOeILE MOOULAR FIRE MOOULAR NAY RENTAL 001-171-999-5~70 2378? 05/25/95 0O1969 NU~i, JANE J.MITTELJ4AN DEPOSITION &/19/95 300-199-999-5207 23?88 05/25/95 000231 H B S/LQURY, INC. (REISSUE CK) FEB SERVS-PKVIEV 210-199-128-5802 23789 05/25/95 00139~ NATIONAL SANITARY SUPPL HAINT. SUPPLIES FOR CRC 190-182-999-5212 23789 05/25/95 00139~ NATIONAL SANITARY SUPf'L NAINT & JANZTORIAL SUPPLIES 100-182-999-5212 ~3789 05/25/95 OO1396 NATIONAL SANITARY SUPPL NAINT & JARZTORIAL SUPPLIES 190-182-999-5212 3790 05/25/95 OO0239 OLSTEN STAFFING SERVICE TEMP HELP V/E 6/30 GNAGE 001-162-999-5118 18.58- 3/,5.60 192.00. 17.69 14.39 180.00 975.14 595.00 1,571.98 330.70 305.30 276.55 455.63 167.26 345.60 192.00 31.88 100.00 1 '713.23 595 .iX) 1,571 .~e 910.55 23791 05/25/95 001911 PALjk MESA RESORT HGH,T MORKSHOP NAY 15 001-110-999-5258 658.01 23792 05/25/95 000269 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REINB. 001-162-999-5260 23792 05/25/95 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIM8. 001-1~0-999-5261 23792 05/25/95 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REXMB. 001-100-999-5258 23792 05/25/95 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REII4B. 001-110-999-5260 23792 05/25/95 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REii4B. 001-110-999-5260 23792 05/25/95 000269 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH RE!I4B. 001-150-999-5261 23792 05/25/95 000269 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REII4B. 001-163-999-5250 23792 05/25/95 000269 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REII4B. 001-100-999-5258 23792 05/25/95 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH RE!I4B. 190-180-999-5220 23792 05/25/95 000269 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REii4B. 001-140-999-5250 23792 05/25/95 000269 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REII4B. 001-110-999-5260 23792 05/25/95 000269 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REII4B. 001-160-999-5261 12.00 27.00 23.07 32.50 2.50 26.65 7.00 21.55 6.02 16.70 28..02 37.oo 23793 05/25/95 000580 PHOTO I)RKS FZLH AND PHOTO DEVELOPING 100-180-999-5301 10.87 23796 05/25195 001503 PREMIER PAPERS, INC. LINEN COVERS FOR REPORT 001-100-999-5220 268.00 2,68.00 23795 05/25/95 000967 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C BLUEPRINTS FOR PRI(VIEV STATION 210-190-626-5802 23795 05/25/95 0009~7 RANClIO BELL BLUEPRINT C COPIES OF BLUEPRINTS 001-161-999-5226 113.78 10.51 12&.29 23796 05/25/95 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA MATER 03/95-5/95 MATER SERV 23796 05/25/95 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA MATER 0~/95-5/95 MATER SERV 100-180-999-5260 193-180-999-5260 1,325.77 2,188.82 3,516.59 3797 05/25/95 000907 NANCHO CAR MASH CITY VEHICLE MASH & FUEL EXPEN 100-180-999-5216 29.57 3797 05/25/95 000907 RANClIO CAR MASH CITY VEHICLE MASH & FUEL EXPEN 001-163-999-5216 17.86 VOJCMtE2 "',P"",/95 15:37 PAR6 vuuCHER/ ClIEClC CHECK VEII)IR NUI4BER DATE NUMBER 23797 05123195 QO(OQ? 2379? 05123/95 OO0907 23797 05123/95 OO0907 2379? 05125199 QQO gQ7 23798 05/25/95 OO0~,26 23798 05/25/95 OO0~26 05/25/99 OO0~18 238O0 05/23/99 000815 2180105/25/95 00097A 23801 05/25/99 000974 2:5802 05/25/99 OO070/, 2.~02 05/23/99 OOOTOz, 23802 05/25/99 O0070A 23802 05/25/99 O0070z, Z.~502 05/25/99 00070~ 2]802 05/25/99 O0070z, /~"'q3 05/25/99 0007~ ! ..~OA 05/25/95 00188~ 2]805 05/25/99 001888 23806 05/25/99 23807 05/25/99 000~85 23807 05/25/99 000385 23807 05/25/99 000385 23807 05123199 000385 23807 05/25/99 000385 23807 05/25/99 000385 23807 05/25/99 000:585 23807 05/25/99 000385 ;?3808 05/25/99 000513 VEIl)OR M RANCNO CAR MASH RAllCNO0 CJUt kM, SN RNICNQ CAJt blASH RANCRO CJUt t/ASH ItAlICNO IIIOUSTItIAL ~PPL MANClIO IffilAL ~IPPL RIVERSIDE CO. CLERIC& R ROgLEY, CATHERINE RUlZ, CRAIG RUIZ, CI~[G S K S, INC/INIM) OIL S K S, INC/INL/IDOIL S K S, INC/INL/IDOIL S K S, INC/INIM) OIL S K S, INC/INLAND OIL S K S, INCIINL/UID OIL SCANTRON CORPORATION SHAFER, ALICIA SHAFER, AHBER DAUN SHEAFF, DAVID CITY VEHICLE MASH & FUEL EXPEN CITY VEHICLE MASH& FUEL EXPEN CITY VEHICLE MASH & FUEL EXPEN CITY VEHICLE MASH & FUEL EXPEM CITY HALL JANITORIAL GUPPLIES Sit Clfflt JMITORIAL GU;qN,.IES NOTIC~ OF DETERNINATIOII FEE TC~D INSTRUCTDR EARNIN6S SIERRA CONF REIlI:RIJIZ:5/9-12. SPECIES CONF:RIJIZ FUEL EXPEIISE FOR CITY VEHICLES FUEL EXPENSE FOR CITYVEHICLES FUEL EXPENSE FOR CITY VEHICLES FUEL EX3PcMSE FOR CITY VEHICLES FUEL EXPENSE FOR CITYVEHICLES FUEL EXPENSE FOR CITY VEHICLES SCANTROId HAINT AMEE 5/95-4/96 TCSD INSTRUCTOR PAYMENTS TCSO INSTRUCTOR PAYNENTS REFUND FOR TCSD CLASS SHELDON EXTINGUISHER CO COI4PUTER ROOM FIRE EXTINGUISHE SHELDON EXTINGUISHER CO B & S DEPT. FIRE EXTINGUISHER SHELDON EXTINGUISHER CO PU DEPT FIRE.EXTINGUISHERS SHELDON EXTINGUISHER CO CITY HALL FIRE EXTINGUISHERS SHELDON EXTINGUISHER CO TCSI) VEHICLE FIRE EXTINGUISHER SHELDON EXTINGUISHER CO SENIOR CTR. FIRE EXTINGUISHERS SHELDON EXTINGUISHER CO CKC FIRE EXTINGUISHERS SHELDON EXTINGUISHER CO PARKS FIRE EXTINGUISHERS SIle4OldS, BECKY MCLEAN gORKPERFECT SFTMR TRAINING 23809 05125199 SLAVEN, KetCiA 23810 05125199 SHITH, DEEBIE 23811 05123199 000519 COlIF CONN ON THEIR FEET:SLAVEN REFUND FOR TCSD CLASS SOUTH _r~__NTY PEST CORTR PEST CTRL SERVS i SR CNTER OO1-1d5-999-5250 001-161-999-5250 OO1-161-999-5262 OO1-162-999-521& 3&0-199-999-5212 190-181-999-5212 too-180-999-522& 190-183-999-5330 OO1-161-999-5;61 001-161-999-5261 loo-lt4-601-5263 OO1-165-9~9-52~3 001 -le3-999-526~ OO1-110-gW-52g ~I -1~-~-5~ 1~-1~-~-5~ 320-199-999-5215 loo-183-999-5~30 loo-183-999-5330 190-183-6~82 320-199-999-5242 001-162-999-5230 loo-16z,-603-5250 344)-199-999-5250 190-180-999-521/, 190-181-999-5230 190-18,?.-999-5230 loo-180-9~9-5250 320-199-999-5250 OO1-161-999-5272 loo-183-/,982 loo-181-999-5250 ITB( /, .31 13'.&7 33.OO 12.31 450.&0 586.56 65.2O :57T.14 73.86 150.68 27.33 52 202.&5 620.OO 4~6 /,/,6.4,0 20.OO 91,58 &5.OO OO.OO 96.S5 22.50 112.50 150J,9 110.52 651.76 70~.21 1,275.OO 172.31) ~5.OO 29.OO 23812 05/25199 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF BISON - 59-T/'-A16-214,7-01 ELECT SERVS 191-1OO-999-52&0 15 .~0 15 3813 05/23/99 001212 SOUTHERN CALIF GAS COI4P 07-8274-0)6-1651-3 SH CNTR /.--, loo-181-99~-52/,0 52.05 52.O3 vuuCHEl/ CIECIC ~14 ~14 23814 23814 23814 23815 23816 23816 23816 23816 23816 23816 ?.3816 23816 25816 23816 23816 Z3816 75816 :5817 _3817 23818 Z3819 23820 2:5820 23820 23820 23820 23821 23822 Z5826 Z3824 23825 23825 23825 3826 3827 15:37 CHEQC DATE 05/25195 05125195 05125195 05125195 05125195 05/25195 05/25/95 05125/95 05125195 05125195 05/25195 05/25/95 05/25/95 05/25/95 05125195 05125195 05/25/95 05/25/95 05125195 05/25/95 05/25/95 05/25/95 05/25/95 05125195 05/25/95 05125195 05125195 05/25/95 05125195 -m 000294 0002~ 000294 0002~ 0002~ 00029~ 00029~ 0002~ 00029~ 0002~ 0002~ 000Zg~ 0002~ 000574 000574 000316 000319 000319 000319 000319 000319 000320 000826 001970 OOO52/, OO052~ 000524 001209 001437 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPNON SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON SOUTHERN CALIF. INNICIP STATE FUND - SAN FRANCI STATE FUND - SAN FRANCI STATE FUND - ~AN FRANCI STATE Rag) - SAN FRANCI STATE FUIB) - SNI FRANCI STATE RID - SAN FRANCI STATE FIND ' SAN FRNICI STATE FUND - SNI FRANCI STATE FUND - SAN FRANCI STATE FUND - ~ FRANCI STATE FUND - SAN FRANCI STATE FUND - SAN FRANCI STATE FUND - SAN FRANCI SUPERTONER SUPERTONER TEMECULA VALLEY AMERICA THORNHILL, GARY TONARK SPORTS, INC. TONARK SPORTS, INC. Ta4ARKSPl)RTS, INC. TOI4ARK SPORTS, INC. TONARK SPORTS, INC. TCMIE CENTER STATIONERS TRAVEL TRUST TRUCK!/ARE UNETOG RENTAL SERVICE, UNITO6 RENTAL SERVICE, VAN TECH ENGINEERING, I VAN TECH ENGIHEERING, l VAN TECH ENGINEERING, I VAULT INC., THE VIItACK, HARYANN CITY OF TBE~JLA V0UCiEIt/CBECK IEGlji=~ Fat ALLPEItIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION 909 ~-5153 G'( ~ ~-4767 GT ~ 202-4754 rJi ~ 20~-4752 SN ~ 202-4756 I~tTN (EOC:) USVBA-RULEBOCNC FOR TI3D GELS' CONP PMT FOR APR 95 UOItKERS' CCRP PKr FON ANt 95 IIICERS' CCRP PMT FOR ANt 95 MOItKERS' COIIP P!fi' FOR APR 95 UORKERS' e3314P N4T FOR APR 95 IIICERS' CONP PMT FOR APR 95 MOItKERS' CONP PKI' FOR APR 95 I/)RICERS' 13)MP PMT FOR APR 95 IIPIllsi TONER CART REFILL TAX REFUND OF KEY DEPOSIT REINS FOR AICP STUDY COURSE TRANSFOPJ4ER P(IER SUPPLY 6' SIGNAL CABLE CONTROL CONSOLE CARRY CASE FRE I GIft' TAX MlSC OFFICE StJPPLIES BIO CONF:AIRFARE:R.ROeERTS INSTALL STEPS FOR CITY VAN UNIFORNS FOR TCSD CREW UNIFORN NAINT FOR TCSD CItEUS S/L T-SHIRTS WCITY LOGO & PU ONE TINE SET UP CHARGE TAX APERTURE CARDS,TAPES,& STORAGE TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS /R OO1-150-999-5Z08 001 - 161-999-5~38 190-180-999-5208 190-180-999-5;I38 320-1 ~-999- 5208 190-182-999-5220 .' OOl-Z570 100-2~'0 165-Z~/'D 191-2570 192oZ570 lf3-23/0 330-2~/0 001-1182 320-1W-999-5221 3~-1W-999-5~1 1~-2900 ~1-161-999-5~1 190-180-999-5301 lf0-180-;-5301 lf0-180-;-5301 190-180-9W-5301 1f0-180-ffg-5301 OO1-165-999-5220 OO1-100-999-5258 190-180-999-5214 1~-186-999-526 loo-1~-601-5243 ~0-1W-999-52~ ITEI! NlalT 130.42 ~8.12 32.OO 4,088.(:6 1,416.66 32.59 1,841.OO 11.11 121 102.50 4.32 11.11 13.~0 27.13 160.00 10.45 17.52 141 .OO 296.32 25.5O 20.85 1~8,Z~ 12.56 PAE7 NIOUNT 415.24 8,0Z1.90 ~.97 186,42 ' 141 .OO ~.~ ~ .35 VOUCHRE2 ~ 15:37 CITY OF TEMECULA VaJCHER/CIIECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS vuuCHER/ CHECI( CHECK VENDOR VEIl)OR ITEM NUMBER DATE NLIIER M DESCRIPTION 23828 05/25/95 0003~0 Id~ITE CAP INDUSTRIES, ! ORANGE J4ARKING PAINT 23828 05125/95 0003~0 iJIIITE CAP INDUSTRIES, I TAX 23829 05/25/95 000,(,66 VIilTEHEAD, RHONDA TCSD INSTRUCTON EARNIF'aS 23830 05/25/95 000.~5 XERO;( CORPORATION BILLI USEAM CHARM FOR 5/&-5/30/95 100-16&-6(X3-52&2 100-16/,-603-52&2 190-183-999-5330 330-199-999-5217 ITEM NI31MT 3'.65 25~.00 81.00 PAGE 8 AMOUNT TOTAL CHECKS 62,218.53 VOUCHRE2 r ' '~1/93 14:11 CITY OF TEllCIlIA VOI. IClIEIt/CIIECII: REGISTER Flit ALL PEItlll)S PA~E9 FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 100 GAS TAX FUND 165 RDA DEV- LOg/NOD GET AS!DE 190 COleIUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 191 TCSD GERVICE LEVEL A 19Z TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 193 TCSD GERV]GE LEVEL C 210 CAPITAL IIqPROVEleENT PROJ FUND 280 REDEVELOIqeENT AGENCY - CIP SO0 INSURANCE ~ 320 INFORHATIQN SYSTEHS 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 3/,0 FACILITIES TOTAL aT 57,911.11 12,813.03 2a5.27' 18,624.65 16,521.10 21,427.35 181.02 5,167..73 1,203.80 Z36,437.30 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TBECULA ~ 14:11 VOUCIEIt/CIECI( IEGZSTEIt FOR ALL PEIt,30S PAGEI vuuCHER/ CHECK: CHECK VEIIXl VEIl)OR ZTBI NUNBER DATE NIIIBER M DESCRIPTION IUNBER ITEM AMIIIT 2)831 05/26/f5 000883 NONTELEOIE EXCAVATING 238:32 05129195 001915 CRESTE VEIlDE ESatOU CLEAN OUT UNDER CITY'S BItIDES PtltCHASE NAIN ST IliaPER. 4206,.t9 0610119500e~ FIRSTAX (EDD) 000~ EDI 621)619 06101195 00~,-~ FIRSTAX (EDD) 0004~. SOl 620639 06/01/~5 00~.~ FZRSTAX (EDD) O00M~ ED] 620639 06/01/~500L'~ FIRSTAX (EDO) O00M~ STATE 620639 06/01/9500L'~.~ FIRSTAX (EDO) O00M~ STATE 620639 06/01/9500Ct~ FIRSTAX (EDD) O00M~ STATE 620639 06/01/~5000~ FIRSTAX (EDD) O004J~ STATE 620639 06/01/~500C~:~ FIRSTAX (EDD) O00M~ STATE 620639 06/01/95 O00Z~4 FIRSTAX (EDD) OO04J~ STATE 620639 06/01/95 00~.-~ FIRSTAX (EDD) O004J~ STATE 6206)9 06/01/95000~ FIRSTAX (EDD) O004J~ STATE 6206)9 06/01/95 00~ FIRSTAX (EDO) O00M~ STATE 620~39 0~/01/95 00~:~ FIRSTAX (EDO) OOO4J~ STATE 620639 06/01/95 00(0~ FIRSTAX (EDD) O004J~ STATE 620639 06/01/95 000~ FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 100-1M-601-5~1 280-1/00 2,212.00 162.30 41.97 .' 58.31 3,028.29 6&4.52 10.77 5A2.86 16.76 6.91 45.86 88.73 18.96 14.07 2,212.00 95,162.)0 4,4~X).35 ~672~ 06/01/95 00028~ FIRSTAX (IRS) 00028~ FEDERAL 5723 06/01/95 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 00028~ FEDERAL /"~'~ 06/01/95 00028~ FIRSTAX (ZRS) 00028~ FEDERAL ,06/01/~5 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 65or/.3 06/01/95 0002R'4 FIRSTAX (IRS) 00028~ FEDERAL 65672~ 06/01/95 00028~ FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL · 65672~ 06/01/95 00028~ FIRSTAX (IRS) 00028~ FEDERAL 4567Z~ 06/01/95 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 65672] 06/01/95 000283 FIRSTAX (iRS) 00028~ FEDERAL 656723 06/01/95 00028~ FIRSTAX (IRS) 00028~ FEDERAL 65672~ 06/01/95 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 65672~ 06/01/95 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 65672j 06/01/95 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 . HEDICARE 656723 06/01/95 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 HEDICARE 65677.J 06/01/95 00028~ FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 IIEDICARE 656723 06/01/95 000283 FIRSTAX (]RS) 00028~ I~DICNtE 656723 06/01/95 00028~ FIRSTAX (]RS) 00028~ IEDICNiE 65672~ 06/01/95 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 00028~ tEDICARE 656723 06/01/95 00028~ FIRSTAX (IRS) - 00028} HEDICNE 656723 06/01/95 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 14EDICARE 656723 06/01/95 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 00028~ HEDICARE 65672~ 06/01/95 00028~ FIRSTAX ([RS) 000283 IEDICAItE 656723 06/01/95 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 0(X)283 IIE!)ICNE ~56723 06/01/95 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 NE!)ICARE 001-2070 100-20/0 165-2070 191-2070 192-20/0 1~-2070 280-2070 300-Z070 :~0-2070 340-2070 001-20/0 100-2070 165-20/0 191-20?0 1~2-2070 lf~-20/0 280-2070 11,4~9.~ 1,897.~ 40.17 2,~2.~ 69.40 ~.M 213.~ 11.~ 11Z.~ 1~ 129.60 2,742.~ 17.~ ~.10 58.55 M.50 21,561.08 2~835 06/01/95 001952 A C N PUBLICATIONS AD IN RATIONAL CltRFT 1~-1~-999-5254 71.25 7,3836 06/01/95 001895 A T & T - VAN liUYS 730 373 8QOQ Q01 W 13.08 13.Q8 ;837 06/01/95 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP /-"7 06/01/95 0001,16 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 001-2310 100-2310 )07.59 81 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TB4ECULA 01/95 1&:11 VIXJCNER/CNEClC REGISTER FOR ALL PER!ll)S PAGE 2 VCIJCHER/ CHEClC CHECK VEIIXXt V~NDOIt ITEN ACC~ NIMBER DATE IMBER M DESCRIPTION NUIIER ITEN 23837 06/01/95 QOQ116 A V P VISION PLANS QOQ116 AVP 1~5-2310 23837 06/01/95 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 190-2310 23837 06/01/95 QOQ116 A V P VISION PLAXS OOO116 AVP 191-231Q 23837 06/01/95 00O116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 193-2310 2383? 06/01/95 OOO116 A V P VISION PLANS OOO116 A~I~ 28Q-2310 2383? 06/01/95 0OO116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 300-231Q 238~? 06/01/95 OOO116 A V P VISION PLANS OO0116 AVP 360-231Q 2383? 06/01/95 OOO116 A V P VISION PLANS 0OO116 AVP COIl (X)1-1180 2383? 06/01/95 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP DED .' 001-2310 2383? 06/01/95 OO0116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 001-2310 2383? 06/01/95 OOO116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP RIVE 001-231Q 6.18 5.~ 16.19: 2.~ 1.H 1.52 1.52- 580.65 23838 06/01/95 OO1086 ADCO EQU[PNENT SALES 23838 06/01/95 001086 ADCO EQUIPHENT SALES REPLACEMENT PARTS FOR GRINDER 100-16~-601-5602 TAX 100-166-601-5402 65.16 3.50 23839 06/01/95 000101 APPLE ONE, INC. TB4P HELP WE 5113-20 NEER 280-199-999-5230 258.00 258.00 23860 06/01/95 001323 ARROUNEAD MATER, INC. MATER FOR BtK CREli 6 YARD I00-166-601-5260 60.76 238~1 O6/01/~5 000122 B S N SPORTS VOLLEYBALL NETS - ~kCOREGOR 19Q-183-999-5380 ~8~1 06/01/95 000122 B S U SPORTS FREIGHT 190-183-909-5)80 S8~1 06/01/95 000122 B S N SPO~TS TAX 190-183-999-538Q · .38~2 06/01/95 000120 BICKNELL TRAWL CENTER CITY CLERK CONF:AIRFARE:GREEK 001-120-999-5261 2.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'~3 O6/01/95 00015~, C S N F 0 PUB:EXCELLENCE IN BUDHETING 001-160-999-5228 213.00 23.63 16.51 171.00 16.16 252.96 / 16.16 2384~ 06/01/95 0007002 CADDY GRAPHICS TOURISH BIX)TH STONY BOARD 280-199-999-5230 191 191.66 23847 06/01/95 00157.8 CALIFORNIA DEPT OF JUST ~I'H ANNUAL ORIHE CONF:RONINSON 001-170-99~-5261 125.00 125.00 23868 O6/01/~5 000127 CALIFORNIAN, INC. -LEGA 13 HEEKS StJBSCRIPTIOR 190-180-999-5228 17.51 17.51 23849 06/01/95 000135 CENTRAL CITIES SIGN HER CITY SIGNS AND IIARDUARE 100-166-601-5266 23869 06/01/95 000135 CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER CITY SIGNS & HAN)MARE 100-16A-601-52&~ 238~9 06/01/95 000135 CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER CITY SIGNS AIQ HARDiJARE 100-16A-601-52~6 238~9 06/01/95 000135 CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER TEMPORARY "NO PARKING SIGNS" 1900-180-999-5301 23849 06/01/95 000135 CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER TAX 190-180-999-5301 238~9 06/01/95 000135 CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER BIKE ROUTE SIGNS 210-190-162-58(X 108.29 53.88 113.755 8.82 51.72 23850 06/01/95 000629 CHESHER, RUTH ART MRK GIFT FOR SISTER CITY 001-100-999-5258 82.5O 82.50 23851 O6/01/95 0001)8 CITICORP NORTH AIIERICA LEASE PNT FOR TELEPHONE SYSTEN 320-190-;-5)~1 23851 06/01/95 0001)8 CITICORP NONTH ANERICA LEASE PNT FOR TELEPHONE SYSTEN 320-199-999-5208 2:3851 06/01/95 0001)8 CZTZCORP NONTH ANER]CA LEASE PHT FOR TELEPHONE SYSTEH 320-2800 162.03 .12 1 ,?.85.62 1,627.57 23852 06/01/95 000160 COLONIAL LIFE &ACCIDEN 0001~0 600 A&S 001-2330 23852 O6/01/95 000160 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 0001/,0 600 A&S 190-2330 1852 O6/01/95 000160 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN 0001/,0 CNtCER 001-2330 1852 o6/01/f5 000160 COLONIAL LIFE & ACClDEN 000160 CANCER 100-2330 J852 O6/01/95 000160 COLONIAL LIFE &ACClDEN 00014,0 CAllCElt 165-2330 39.75 1~4.71 12.94 6.67 CITY OF TEHECUt. A VQUCHER/CIECK REGIsYik FOR ALL PERI(I)S PAGE VOUCHEll/ CHECK CHECK 14tNBER DATE M ITBI DESCRIPT!Oll ITB! AII]UNT 23852 06/01/95 0001/,0 23852 06/01/~5 O001&O 23852 06/01/~5 0001/,0 23852 06/01/95 00014,0 23853 06/01/~5 000156 23853 06/01/95 000156 2)853 06/01/95 000156 23853 06/01/95 000156 2~53 06/01/95 000156 2)856 06101195 001951 2)85/, 06101195' 001951 2)856 06101195 001951 CQt.ONIAL LIFE &ACCIDEN COt.QIIIAL LIFE &ACCIDEN COLONIAL LIFE &ACCIDEN COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN DENTICARE OF CALIFOR141A DENTICRREOF CALIFORNIA DENTICNIEOF CALIFORNIA DENTICAREOF CALIFONiIA DE14TICARE OF CALIFORNIA DISCO PR!14T SUPPLY CO. DISCOPRINT SUPPLY CO. DISCO PRINT SUPPLY CO. 0001/,0 CANCElt 000140 CANC8 O001&O rANCElt 000140 CAleB 000156 DEII-NIIN 000156 DEIIT-ADV 000156 DEllTIN 000156 DEIrr-REV LIFT/TILT VASE NANUAL FREIGHT TAX 190-Z50 191 193-Z~0 280-Z~) 001 -Z~,O 001-1180 001 -Z~O 081-1180 001-2~0 :~0-1970 :~0-1970 ~20-1970 8;.d4 16.35 17.53 6.67 15.00 7.8~ 7.8~ ~5 .~ 56.19 565.61 ~.~ 816.~ 2)855 06/01/95 001002 2)855 06/01/95 001002 ~5 06/01/95 001002 2)855 06/01/95 001002 FIRST INTERSTATE NIIK C FIRST INTERSTATE BAliK C FIRST INTERSTATE BNIK C FIRST INTERSTATE BANK C 5~736666Q 0~91 019814414 54,73 6666 0~91 0115 JG 5/.73 6666 0~91 0057 SN 5~73666&. 0~91QQ57ON ~1-110-f99-5260 ~1-1~-999-5~1 1~-1~-999-5~8 1~-1~-999-5260 "S856 06/01/95 QQQBQ3 FLAGHOUSE, INC. 16'TEN1 DOUBLE ELININATIQN 190'180-999'5~01 5856 06/01/95 000803 FLAGHOUSE, INC. RAULING FOOTBALLS 190-180-999-5)01 ~ ~6 06/01/95 000803 FLAGHOUSE, INC. FREIGHT 190-180-999-5301 ~ 06/01/95 000803 FLAGHOUSE, INC. TAX 190'180-999'5301 -"~56 06/01/95 00080~ FLAGHOUSE, INC. DOlai LINENAN CHAIN SET 190'180'999'5~)1 23856 06/01/95 00080~ · FLAGHOUSE, INC. FREIGHT 190'180-999'5301 23856 06/01/95 00080~ FLAGHOUSE, INC. TAX 190'180'999'5~01 2)857 06/01/95 00018~ G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYtl 909 699-79~5 CRC FIRE 3~-1ff-99~-5208 47..16 407.71) 220.0~ 59.67 37.~0 12).50 17.75 12.51 118.50 13.06 9.18 Z.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'~58 06/01/95 000177 GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT NISC OFFICE $ZJPPLIES 2)858 00/01/95 000177 GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT TAX ~1-1~-999-5220 ~1-1~-999-5~0 81 6.35 23859 06101/95 000~30 GROUP AHERICA - VOLUNTA 000~30 VL ADVAN 23859 06101195 000630 GROUP ANERICA - VOLUNTA 000~30 VOL LIFE 2)859 06/01/95 000/,30 GROUP NqERICA- VOLONTA OOGG30 VOL LIFE 2)859 06/01/95 000/,30 GROUP AHERICA- VOLUNTA 000~30 VOL LIFE 23859 06/01/95 000630 GROUP AI4ERICA - VOLUNTA 000/,30 VOL LIFE 23859 06/01/95 000430 GROUP AIIERICA - VOLUNTA 000430 VOL LIFE ~59 06/01/95 000~30 GROUP HRICA- VOLUNTA 000/,;.'.'.'.'.'.'.~) VOL LIFE 23859 0&/01/95 000/~0 GROUP NIERICA- VOLUNTA 000430 VL REVER 23859 06/01/95 000/~0 GROUP NIERICA - VOLU14TA 0004~ VOL LIFE 2)859 06/01/95 I)1)0/,30 riOUP NIERICA - VOLUNTA ~ VOL LIFE 23859 06/01/95 I)00~30 GROUP N4ERICA - VOLUNTA 0004~0 VOL LIFE Z.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.T~S9 06/01/95 000~30 GROUP NIERICA - VOLU14TA 0004~0 VOL LIFE 23859 0&101195 000/,30 GROUP N4ERICA- VOLUNTA 000/~0 VOL LIFE ~9 I)6/01/95 000430 GROUP NIERICA - VOLU14TA CASET & THORSBORSE ADJUSTIIENT ~9 06/01/95 I)00~30 GROUP A/ERICA - VOLU14TA CASEY & THORSBONIE/.DJUSTIIENT 001-2510 001-2510 100-2510 190-2510 192-2510 320-2510 344)-2510 001-2510 001-2510 100-2510 190-2510 192-2510 3~0-2510 001-2510 100-2510 1~0.80 139.00 11.40 6.00 .15 .41 190.80- 1~8.91 15.79 6.00 .2~ &.~9- 373.30 S860 06/01195 000378 HAFEL[, THOI4AS /~----,~ SIERRA CONF:REINB:T.HAFELI ~20-199-999-5258 240.&9 VOUCHRE2 "31195 VouCHER/ CHECK NIJNBER 23861 23862 23862 23862 23862 23862 23862 23862 23862 23862 23862 23862 23862 23862 23862 23862 23862 23862 23862 ~3862 5862 5862 J862 23862 23862 23862 23862 23862 23862 23862 23862 23862 23862 23862 2.3862 23862 23862 23865 23865 23865 23865 23865 23865 3865 ~865 14:11 CHECI( DATE 06/01/95 06/01/95 06101/95 06/01/95 06/01/95 06/01/~5 06/01/95 06/01/95 06/01/f5 00/01/95 06/01/95 06/01/95 06/01/95 06/01/95 06/01/95 06/01/95 06/01/95 06/01/95 06/01/95 06/01/95 06/01/95 06/01/95 06/01/95 06/01/95 06/01/95 06/01/95 06/01/95 06/01/95 06/01/95 06/01/95 06/01/95 06/01/95 06/01/95 06/01/95 06/01/95 06/01/95 06/01/95 06101195 06101195 06/01/95 00/01/95 06101/95 0b/01/95 06/01/95 00/01/95 06/01/95 06/01 VEI)OR NtI4BER 001536 001536 001536 001536 001536 001536 001536 001536 001536 001536 001536 001536 001536 00157~ 0015366 001536 001536 001536 O01536 001536 Q01536 001536 0015:36 001536 001536 O01536 00 1536 O01536 001536 001536 001013 001013 M · U.L, BEElICE HARTFORD LIFE liCE HARTFORD LIFE INIIINIIZ HARTFOiU) LIFE INSLINICE HARTFORD LIFE liCE HARTFON) LIFE INSUlINICE HARTFORD LIFE llCE HARTFORD LIFE IIISURNICE HARTFORD LIFE INSIIMf~ HARTFORD LIFE INSIJIIAIdCE HARTFORD LIFE INStlNICE HARTFORD LIFE INStlMNCE HARTFORD LIFE INSI, II/ICE HARTFORD LIFE INSUlINiCE HARTFORD LIFE liCE HARTFORD LIFE IN_m_.e. NICE HARTFORD LIFE liCE HARTFO!IB LIFE IMEUINiCE HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE HARTFORD LIFE INSUlINICE HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE HARTFORD LIFE INSURNICE HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE HARTFOND LIFE INSURANCE HARTFOIU) LIFE INSIJRANCE HARTFORD LIFE liCE NARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE HARTFORD LIFE INSUltAliCE HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE HARTFORD LIFE INSlJRANCE HARTFORD LIFE INSIJRANCE HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE HINDERLITER de LLAK4SA HINDERLITER de LIANAS A RETIREHINT TRUE RETIREHINT TRUE RETIREMEIIT TINS RETIRBIENT TITUS RETIREMENT TRUS RETIREMENT TRUS RETIREMENT TRUS RETIREMENT TRUS CITY OF TENECULA VOOCHER/Ct~CJ: ReGISTeR ~ ALL I~ltlO0~ ITEm DESCRIPTION IrEFUl) FON TCSD 13.ASS 001536 LIFE 001536 LIFE INS 001536 LIFE INS 001536 LIFE I1~ 001536 LIFE INS 001536 LIFE INS 001536 LIFE INS 001536 LIFE INS 001536 LIFE INS 001536 LIFE INS 001536 LIFE IH$ 001536 LIFE INS 001536 LTD 001536 LT!) 001536 LTD 001536 LTD 001536 LTD 001536 LTD 001536 LTD 001536 LTD 0015'36 LTD 001536 LTD 001536 LTD 001536 LTD 001536 STD 001536 S1'1) 001~ STD 0015::36 $TD 001536 ST!) 001536 $TO Q01536 STI) 001536 STD 001536 $TD 001536 ST!) 001536 STD 001536 STD SALES TAX ANALYSIS 151' QTR SALES TAX FINDER FEE 00019~ DEF CONP 00019~ DEF CONP OO0194 DEF CONP 000194 DEF COMP 000194 DEF CONP 000194 DEF CONP 000194 DEF CONP 000194 DEF CONP 190-18a-&98Z O01-Zt60 100-2360 165-23~0 190-2360 191-2360 192-2360 · 193-ZM0 28Q-236Q 300-236Q 330-236Q Do1 -zsBo 100-2380 165-238Q 100-Z38Q 191-238O 192-Z38Q 193-238Q 191 -ZSO0 193-2500 ~0-2500 ~40-2500 001-140-999-52&8 001-140-999-5Z~8 DO1-2080 100-2080 190-2080 191-2080 1~2-2080 lf3-2080 280-2080 340-2080 ITEe 574.50 llZi.SO 2.50 1~.50 4.50 10.00 15.50 8.50 5.00 10.00 10.00 21.50 10/,.10 140.31 5.17 16.10 12.41 5.21 13.8~ 5.17 14.87 1,318.31 · ~2.6.57 8.63 30S .96 9.87 11.26 35.08 27.06 11.36 11.26 1,270.14 85.43 573.92 65.51 75.00 80.06 29.38 22.5O ANOUIT 3,8T/.52 2,201 WUCImE2 1~:11 CITY OF TBECUI.A VOUCNEUCNECK REgiSTER FOR ALL I~EItlOI)S PA6E5 VOUCHER/ CHECK milEit 2)867 23871 23871 23873 ?.3874 Z387/* Z~876 1876 0~/01/~5 06/01/95 06/011~5 06101195 06/01/95 06/01/~5 06/01/~5 06/01/95 0~/01/95 06/01/95 06/01/95 06/01/95 06/01/95 0~/01/g5 06/01/95 06/01/95 06/01/95 06101195 06101195 06/01/95 06101195 06/01/~5 06/01/95 06/01/~5 06101195 06101195 06101195 06101195 06/01/95 06/01/95 06/01/95 06101195 06/01/95 06101/95 06101/f5 06/01/95 06101195 06/01/95 06/01/95 06/01/95 06/01195 06101195 MUlIER 00153,~ 001671 001513 001676 000239 0002:59 0002~6 000246 0002/,6 0002~6 0002~6 000246 0002/,6 000246 000246 000246 0002/,6 0002~6 000246 000246 0002~6 0002A6 00024,6 0002/,6 0002~6 0002~6 0002/,6 000246 000246 O007A6 0002/,6 0002/,6 000266 0002/*5 000245 0002/,5 000Z45 0002/,5 000245 0002/*5 0002~5 M K R T tl FN RADIO LA HASTENS OF File TIIAV LAIDLAW ENVIRO Ii~ENTAL S LIBERTY AUTO CENTER NEXTEL COIIIIICATIOIIS, OLSTEN STAFFING SERVICE OLSTEN STAFFING SERVICE PARTY PZAZZ PERS (BIPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EIFLOYEES' RETIRE PER$ (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (E!!PLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (BIPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EHPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (ENPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (ENPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (ENPLOYEES' SETIRE PERS (BIPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (ENPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EIIPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (ENPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (ENPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (ENPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EHPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (BIPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EHPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (ENPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (ENPLOYEES' RETIRE PEltS (ENPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (ENPLOYEESe RETIRE PERS (ENPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (HEALTH INSIJR. ~ PERS (HEALTH INSIJIt. ~ PERS (HEALTH INSlilt. PRE PERS (HEALTH INSUlt. PRE PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS (HEALTH INSUR. Pile PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS (HEALTH INSIJR. PRE ITBI DESCRIPTION 6TH OF JIJLY BITEITAIN~EIIT GFOA CONF:AIIFARE:NCLNINEY HAZ-NRT STORAeE/I)IIPOSAL BLIFER FOR TCSI) PICK-UP DISPATCH IUtDIOS NOIILE SERVS TENP HELP WE 31Z6-4/23 GRASE TEIF HELP WE 5/7 GRACE 6TH OF JULY STAGE EOUII:'NENT O00Z/~ PER SEDE 0002/,6 PER REDE 0002/,6 PER REDE 0002/~ PERS RET 0002/,6 PERS SET 0002~ PENS SET 0002~ PENS RET 0002~ PERS NET 000246 PEXS SET 000246 PERS RET 000246 PEltS RET 000246 PENS SET' 000246 PENS NET 000246 PENS RET 000246 PENS NET 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 000246 SOeVIVOR 000246 $1JeVIVOR 000246 SURVi VOR 000246 $URV 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SI. IRV]VOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000245 AETNA SO 000245 AETEA SO OOO265 BLSHIELD 000265 Cl611A 000265 ClGNA 000265 ClmiA OO0265 C!6RA (XX265 HELTHIIET ACl3)UIIT 190'18~'999'5'~'0 001-110-999-5258 100-166-601-5630 190-180-999-5216 320-199-999-5209 001-162-999-5118 001-162;999-5118 1SO-1SO-999-5Z58 001 -Z130 190-2130 280-2130 O01-2390 165-2390 190-2390 191-2390 192-Z$90 lg3-23SO 001-2390 100-23~0 165-Z590 1SO-2~g0 191-2390 192-2390 19~-2390 ~0-2390 001-20gO 1SO-2090 001-2090 001 1SO-2190 001-20~0 ITEN 500.00 896.50 ~7.81 911.26 686.SO 55~.27 53 1.08 12,026.56 2,029.91 16.46 2,796.~3 89.91 W.78 319.65 239 off 102.65 268.21 30~ .31 9.62 .23 13.4/, 1./~ .79 .46 .93 .93 2.SO 72t .78 39.81 397.91 857.37' 22.96 306.29 38.27 6,156.6& NIXlIT 1,397'.26 556.27 18,589.2~ VOUClBE2 "'01/~5 14:11 CITY OF TENEEUI. A VOIJEHER/EIEEK REGISTER FOR ALL PERICOI VuuCHER/ CHECK NtNBER CHECK DATE IUIER M ITEN DESCRIPTION ITEN ANOIMT ~74 238?4 ~3874 ~74 ~74 ~x874 23874 2JTd~74 ~74 23874 ~74 174 ~874 ~74 ~874 ~874 ~874 ~874 ~87~ ~874 ~74 ~874 ~874 ~874 ~874 ~874 ~87'5 06/01/95 06/01/f5 06/01/95 06/01/95 06101195 06101195 06101195 O6101195 06101195 06101195 06101195 06/01/95 O6/01/95 O6/01/95 O6/01/95 06101195 O6/01/95 06101195 O6/01/95 O6/01/95 O6/01/95 O6/01/95 06101195 O6/01/95 O6/01/95 O6/01/95 06/01/95 O6/01/95 O6/01/95 06/01/95 06/01/95 06/01/95 06/01/95 O6/01/95 06/01/95 O6/01/95 06/01/95 O6/01/95 O6/01/95 06/01/95 O6/01/95 O6/01/95 06101195 O6/01/95 O6/01/95 O6/01/95 000245 0002~5 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 001~58 PERS (HEALTH INSLIt. PIE 000?.4;5 PERS (HEALTH INSUlt. PRE 0002~ PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PIE 000~5 PERS (HEALTH INSUR, PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUlt, PIE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PIE 000245 PEltS (HEALTH INSUlt. PIE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUlt, PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUlt. PIE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR, PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH IND. PRE 0002A5 PER$ (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUlt. PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH IND. PIE 0002~5 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PIE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PIE 0002~5 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PIE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSIJR. PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUlt. PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR, PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUlt, PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR, PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH IND. PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUlt. PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH IND. PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSIJR. PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR, PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH IND. PIE 000245 PERS (HEALTH IND. PIE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSIM. PIE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS LONG TERN CARE PRO HELTHNET RELTHNET RELTNIIT HELTNNET RELTNNET HELTHNET RELTHNET KAISERSO Ir,,Ai~ERSO KAISERSO EAISERSO PACl F I I~ PACtFlat PACIFICIt PACiFiCIt PC PEltS CHO PERS ClIO PERS ClIO PERS DED PER$-AD!4 TNCECAP. E TAKE(ARE TAKE(ARE TAKE(ARE AETNA SO BLSHZELD HELTHNET HELTHNET HELTHNET HELTHNET HELTHNET KAISERSO KAISERSO KAISERSO PACIFICIt PACIFICR PC PER$ CHO PER$ REV TAKECARE TAKE CARE TAKECARE TAKE CARE EleLOYEE'S PORTlOll FOR SPETZ'S OO1958 PERS L-T 001-20~0 150-2090 190-2090 192-2090 001-2090 001-2090 190-2090 280-2090 001-2090 001-2090 001-2090 100-2090 165-2090 280-2090 001-20~0 001-20~N) 001-2090 100-2090 190-2090 280-2090 001-2090 150-2090 001-2090 100-2090 001-2090 001-2090 O01-2090 001-2090 150-2090 165-2090 001-1170 100-2122 1,208J7 1,348.25 14,3.53 175.43 237.07 159.4.B 44)6.55 SO4.74 612.12 513.20 61.:56 1,032.38 39/,.73 160.79 512.76 1,607.97' 11.52 3.46 720.51 101.79 1,~82.09 96.01 18.7'0 20.45 273.81 13.57 55.18 11.72 8.10 5.92 17.87 3.15 35.26 23.32 121.24 720.51- ~.10 15.14 9.96 204,.94. 51.71) 20,201.40 51 ./0 m76 ~876 06/01/95 06101195 O6/01 SO1537 SO1537 SO1537 PRINCIPAL HUTUAi., INC. 001537 PRINCIPAL HUTUAL, INC. 001537 PRINCIPAL NI/rUAL, INC. 001537 DENT N)V DENTALPN DENTALIql SO1-1180 SO1-2340 100-2344) 96.18 1,160.41 296o32 VOUCHER/ C~ NUI~ER 14:11 CIIECI: _ DATE VEIlOR MANE CITY OF TENECULA VCUCIIER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL I~RICOS lIEN DEICRIPTIOM 23876 06/01/95 Q01537 PWlIICIPAL INTUAL, INC. Q01537 DEITAI.PN 23876 06/01/95 001537 PRINCIPAL INTUAL, INC. 001537 DBfTALPN 23876 00101/95 001537 PRINCIPAL NUTUAL, INC. (X31537 DENTALPN ~76 00101/95 001537' PRINCIPAL NUTLIAL, INC. 001537 I)ENTALI~( 23876 00/01195 001537' PRINCIPAL IIJTUAL, INC. 00155"'/ DEffI'ALPM 238?6 06/01/95 0015:37 PRINCIPAL !rITUAL, INC. 001537 DENTALPN 238?6 00/01/95 001537 PRINCIPAL NI.rrUAL, INC. (101537 DENTALPN 238?6 00/01/95 001537 PRINCIPAL NLrrUAL, ZIIC. 001537 DENTALPN 238?6 00/01/95 00153? PRINCIPAL Itn'UAL, INC. 00153/' DBrrALPN 23877 238?7 238?8 238?9 23881 r5881 i881 00/01/95 06/01/95 06101195 06101195 06101195 00/01/95 00/0 1/~5 00/0 1/~5 00/01/95 00/01/95 00/01/~5 00/0 1/95 06/01/95 00/01/95 06/01/95 06/01/95 06/01/95 00/01/95 00101195 00101195 00/01/95 00/01/95 00/01/95 06101195 06/01/95 06101195 06101195 06101195 06101195 000255 OO0?.55 0O0874. 000262 000266 000537 000537 000537 000537 000537 000537 000537 000574 00O574 000305 000305 00154.7 001547 00154.7 00154.7 00154.7 00154.7 00154.7 001547 000307 000642 0006~2 000642 0006~2 PRO LOCIC&ICEY PRO LOCK&KEY RAD[SSON HOTEL RAMClIO CALIFORNIA gATER RIGHTWAY SOUTHERN CAI,,IF EDISON - SOUTHERN CALIF BID - SOUTHERN CAL]F BISON - SOUTHERN CALIF EDID - SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON - SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON - SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON - SUPERTONER SUPERTORER TARGET STORE TARGET STORE TEN6TERS LOCAL 911 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 TEARSTERS LOCAL 911 TEANSTERS LOCAL 911 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 TEANSTERS LOCAL 911 TEN4STERS LOCAL 911 TEAHSTERS LOCAL 911 TF. NECULA TROPHY IX). TEHECULA, CITY OF ' FLE TENECULA, CITY OF ' FLE TEMECULA, CITY OF ' FLE TENECULA, CITY OF ' FLE 23885 8-PADLOCKS FOR GATE TAX CRINE CORF:HOTEL ROON:RORIN$ON 02-79-10100-1 titTER SERV$ PORTABLE TOILET FOR CITY YARD 2-O0-397-5026ELECT SERVS 2-00-397-5059 ELECT SERVS 2-00-397-5007 ELECT SERVS 2-01-202-7330 ELECT SERV$ 2-01-202-7603 ELECT SERVS 2-01-202-7603 ELECT SERVS 66-77-795-8082-01 ELECT SERVS HP Ill CART REFURB TAX RECREATION SUPPLIES NISC SUPPLIES FOR I~ 00154.7 tIN DUES 001547 UN DUES 001547 tm DUES 001547 UN DUES 00154.7 tIN DUES 001547 ON DUES 001547 UN DUES 001547 UN DUES BOYS EASKETBALL TOURNANENT ENPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX ENPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX ENPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX FJeLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX /R 210-190-162-580~ 210-190-14.2-580& 001-170-999-5261 190-180-999-52A0 100-164.-601-5Z58 191 - 180-999-5319 190-180-999-524.0 193-180-999-524.0 192-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 191 - 180-999-5319 190-181-999-524.0 320-199-999-5221 320-199-999-5221 190-182-999-5301 100-164.-604.-5220 001-2125 I00-2125 190-21Z5 191-2125 1~-2125 280-2125 300-2125 320-2125 190-183-999-5380 O01-1OZO 190-1020 100-1020 300-1020 ITEN 10.3'3 197.69 7.32 42.00 8.9/, 36.&6 10.72 16.Z6 &9.33 120.00 9.30 235.97 50.45 57.39 3,638.85 2,328.87 532.46 20,906.95 6,227.59 6,218.06 570.52 34.88 36.58 20.~6 4.97.1'1 86.26 140.60 8.33 28.67 11.10 4.33 18.50 13/, .80 3,14.5.18 551 30.25 12.50 PAlE 7 129.30 255.97 50.65 57.39 40,425.30 57.0~ /95.50 1~4.B0 3,739.4.7 ;887 00/01/95 000320 TOMliE CENTER STATIONERS CREDIT FOR RETURNED OFFICE SUP 190-180-999-5220 50.Z3- -/"'~7 00/01/95 000320 TME CENTER STATiONERS NISC OFFICE SUPPLIES 100-180-999-5220 113.&6 VOUCNIE2 01/95 VuUCHER/ CHECK NU!4BER 23887 23887 23887 23887 23887 23887 14:11 CHECK DATE 06/01/95 06/01/95 06/01/95 06/01/95 061011~5 06/01/95 MR VENDat lINE TME CENTER STATIONERS TOI41i CENTER STATIOIIEItS TOi CENTER STATIONERS TOll CENTER STATIONERS TOlaIE CENTER STATIONERS T(MIE CENTER STATIONERS CITY OF TENECULA VOUCHER/CHECK IIEGIs~bt FOR ALL PERIODS ITEN DESCRIPTION NISC OFFICE SIJPPLIES NISC OFFICE SIJPKIES NISC OFFICE IJPPt. IES NISC OFFICE SLFPLIES NISC OFFICE SUPPLIES MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES 23888 06/01/~5 001065 U S C 14/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF CONP ~ 06/01/~5 001065 U S C M/PBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF CGIIP 23888 06/01/~5 001065 U S C n/FEBSOD (DEF. C 001065 DEF GOlF 23888 06/01/~5 001065 U S C n/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COl4P 23888 06/01/g5 001065 U S C n/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COle 23888 06/01/~5 001065 U S C H/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF CCRP 23889 06/01/95 000389 U S C M/PEBSCO COBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 23889 06/01/95 000389 U S C M/PEBSCO COBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 23889 06/01/95 000389 U S C H/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 06/01/95 06/01/95 06/01/95 06/01/95 06/01/95 2)890 23890 '~1890 ~890 5890 23891 000325 000325 000325 000325 000325 000326 001881 001881 0003~5 23892 23892 23893 UNITED VAY OF THE INLAN UNITED VAY OF THE INLAN UNITED kgkY OF THE INLAId UNITED MAY OF THE INLAId UNITED MAY OF THE INLAN UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE, MATER SAFETY PRODUCTS, MATER SAFETY PRODUCTS, XERO;( CORPORATION BILLI 06/01 06/01/95 06/01/95 06/01 OOO325 IN 000325 IN 000325 IN 000325 tN 000325 UV UNIFORI4S FOR IN MAINT CItEMS 150- CPR NICROSHZELDS FREIGHT COPIER NNTHY LEASE AGREElENT ACCOUNT NUNBER 190'180'999'5E0 001-165-999-5220 190-180'999'5220 190' 180'999'5220 190-180-999-5220 001 ' 163-999-5220 001-2080 : 100-Z080 1~0-2080 300-2080 32o-2o8o 001-2100 100-2160 190-2160 001-2120 100-2120 165-2120 190-2120 280-2120 100-164-N:)1-5243 190-183-999-5310 1~0-183-~-5310 330-199-999-5239 ITEN NIXNT 8.87 3.21 75 10.25 42./,1 2,1/2.25 17.6.38 211.50 317.Q(:) 50.00 56.76 6.W, 17.00 .75 23.50 150.00 5.02 2,986.12 PAlE 8 :252.&7 781.76 155.02 2,f86.12 TOTAL CHECKS VOUCHRE2 14:58 CITY OF TEI~CULA VOUCHEll/NiX REGISTER FOil ALL PER!OOS PAGE6 fi,IID TIT~ 001 GENERAL FUND 100 GASTAXF'UND 1,60 CONIILINITY DEV BLOCK GRANT 165 RDA DEV- LOg/NiX) SET ASIDE 190 COI, I,I,IITY SERVICES DISTRICT 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 193 TC$O SERVICE LEVEL C 210 CAPITAL I!IPROVENENT PROJ FtlD Z50 CAPITAL PROJECTS - TCSD 280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP 300 INSURANCE FUND :320 INFORNATION $YSTENS :330 SUPPORT SERVICES TOTAL 134,648.76 Z8,737.39 3,331 5,996.51 29, 116.69 2,287.13 19,Q01 109,ZZB.Z1 1,28~.53 170,Z$1 3,8~6.12 1,1~.07 VOUClIRE2 ClT~ OF TENECULA 31/95 15:02 VOIDlilt/CliCK IEGISTEIt FOR ALL PEItla)S PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK Vii)OIl VEIX)It ITBI NUMBER DATE NtlIER NIRE DESCRIPTIOR mT IAIIER ITBI mT 23897 06/13/95 001281 ALHNeRA grOUP 23898 06/13,,95 001044 BAILY VINEYNID & MINERY ~r&11lES$ PNT:DESI~II-IMRG PIIK VOORBIIG SISTER CIT/DINNER ~ 06113195 000123 BIJRKE UILLItRS&SORENS APR 95 LEGAL SERV$ 23899 06113195 00012:5 BURKE UILLIANS & SOltENS APR 95 LEGAL SERVS 23899 06/13/95 000123 BURKE MILLINI$ & SOItENS APR 95 LEGAL SERVS 23899 06/13/95 000123 BURKE MILLIARS & SOREN$ .APR 95 LE~kL SERVS 210-100-119-5802 001-100-999-5258 001-1~0-999-5Z~6 001 - 1~0-999-52~6 190-180-999-5246 001-1280 8,900.00 3,8&8.21 3,150.00 18,1~1.15 762.00 194.72 8,900.00 3,84~8.21 22,247.87 23900 06/13/95 0001Z8 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, 3YR P.O.B. RENEMAL FOR J.EREEK 300-199-999-5200 23901 06/13/95 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE NA NAY LANDSCAPE SERVS i NEIGH PR 100-180-999-5415 23901 06/13/95 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE NA NAY LANOSCAPE SERVS i CRC 100-182-999-5&15 23901 06/13/95 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE NA NAY LAMOSCAPE SERVS 8 YNEZ NED 191-180-999-5&15 23901 06/13/95 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE NA NAY LANOSCAPE SERV$ O $R CNTR 190-181-999-5~15 23901 06/13/95 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE NA RANCliO CAL NEDIANS(318050~083 191-180-999-5~15 1,050.00 12,759./,~ 1,619.00 859.9~ 175.00 1,427.19 · 1,050.00 16,8~).57 23902 06/13/95 000135 CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER TRAIL SIGNS FOR SANTA GERTRUD$ 210-190-142-580~ 2,8456.02 23902 06/13/95 000135 CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SiR TAX 210-100-142-580~ 222.12 3,008.14 ~9O3 06/13/95 001195 CENTRAL SECURITY SERVIC CITY VEHICLES RACK-UP ALAItMS 001-16~-999-5242 328.66 590~ 06/13/95 001195 CENTRAL SECURITY SERVIC CITY VEHICLES RACK-UP ALARMS 001-165-999-5242 16~.33 390~ 06/13/95 001195 CENTRAL SECURITY $ERVIC CITY VEHICLES RACK-UP ALARI6 100-164-601-5242 16f,.:5 ...~90~ 06/13/95 001195 CENTRAL SECURITY SERVIC CiTY VEHICLES RACK-UP ALAIU6 100-16~-604-5214 164.~ 23903 06/13/95 001195 CENTRAL SECURITY SERVIC CITY VEHICLES RACK-UP ALARHS 001-162-999-5214 821.65 23903 06/13/95 001195 CENTRAL SECURITY SERVIC CITY VEHICLES RACK-UP ALAI~S 190-180-999-5242 1,314.6~ 2,957.9~ 2390~ 06/13/95 001924 DAVID H. GRIFFITH & ASS NAR/APR DEVIL INPACT FEES STDY 001-1A0-999-5248 6,9'50.00 23904 06/13/95 001924 DAVID N. MIFFITH & ASS NAIt/APR DEVEL ElIPACT FEE EXPEN 001-140-999-52/,8 618.56 23904 06/13/95 001924 DAVID H. GRIFFITH & ASS APR SCHOOL INPACT FEES STUDY 001-140-999-52~8 5,88~.82 13,4~3.38 23905 06/13/95 00097~ DEL RIO ENTERPRISE YNEZ i TIERRA LEFT TURN POCKET 100-164-601-5402 12,555.00 12,555.00 23906 06/13/95 001951 DISCO PRINT $tJPPLY CO. CALCOI!P DRAVING BOARD 320-1970 1,720.76 239O6 06/13/95 001951 DISCO PRINT SUPPLY CO. FREIGHT 320-1970 15.00 23906 06/13/95 001951 DISCO PRINT SUPPLY CO. TAX 320-1970 1:55.36 1,869.12' 25907 06/13/95 001380 E s I Et!PLOYI4ENT SERVIC TEMP HELP VEEK APR 1-28: COX 001-162-999-5250 239O7 06/13/95 001380 E S I EtFLOYIENT SERVIC TEHP HELP VEEKAPR 1-28: COLE 001-162-999-5250 3,696.00 2,080.00 5,776.00 2,]908 06/13/95 000754 ELLIOTT GROUP, THE APR 95 LANDSCAPE REVIEU FEES 001-161-999-5250 2,740.00 2,7&0.00 23909 06113195 00016/, ESGIL CORPORATION APR 95 PLAN CHECK SERVICES 001 -162-999-52~8 4,064.99 4,06~.99 23910 06/13/95 001056 EXCEL LANDSrAPE SIGNET SERIES-SOLANA 1ff(206773 193-180-999-5~16 .1,620.00 23910 06113195 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE NAY LANDSCAPE SERVS-SLUPE AREA 193-180-999-5~15 17,~81.26 23910 06/13/95 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE NAY LANDSCAPE SERVS-SPT PRK 100- 180-999-5,~15 6,877.81 $91106/13/95 001879 FURNITURE FGR LESS TVIN NATTRESS AND BOX SPRING 001-171-999-5470 1,000.00 $91106/13/95 001879 FURNITURE FOR LESS LANPS 001-171-999-5470 79.98 S911 O6113195 001879 FURNITURE FOR LESS TV CART 001-171-999-5~70 129.99 VOUCH~E2 VOUCHER/ CHEClC NLJHBER 23911 2:5912 2)912 2)913 2)913 23915 23915 23916 2391 ? 23917 23917 23917 "'3918 |918 ~3~19 239Z0 23920 23920 23920 2)920 2)92~ 239:>1 23921 23922 23923 23923 2)926 23925 2)926 ~927 1927 14:58 CHECK DATE 06113/95 06113195 06113195 D6113195 06113195 06113195 C)6/13/95 06113195 06/13/95 06113195 06/13/95 06/13/95 06/13/95 06/13/95 06/13/95 06/13/95 06/13/95 06/13/95 06/13/95 06/13/95 06/13/95 06/13/95 06/13/95 06/13/95 06/13/95 06/13/95 06/13/95 06/13/95 06/13/95 06/13/95 136/13/95 06/13/95 06/13/95 06/13/95 06/13/95 VENDOR lIMBER 001879 000756 000756 000820 000820 000384 001567 001567 001501 001207 001207 001207 O01207 000220 000220 001892 001892 001339 001):59 001339 001339 001339 000231 000231 001007 001007 001383 00126/, 001955 000262 000267 000267 000267 VENDOR NAI4E FURMITIIE FOR LESS I P S SEWICES, INC. I P S SERVICES, INC. K R W &ASSOCIATES K R V &JL-t~'--IATES LAM/CRANDALL, INC. 14ALEK GENERAL CONTRACTO NALEK GENERAL CONTRACTO HAREfiN COliTRACTORS, INC NABTIN J. JASKA, INC. HARTIN J. JASKA, INC. HARTIN J. JASKA, INC. HARTIN J. JASKA, INC. HAURICE PRINTERS, INC. HAURICE PRINTERS, INC. 1406]LEI4Cl)ULAR 140BILE 14Cl)ULAR HOltTON INTERNATIONAL, I 14()RTON INTERNATIONAL, MORTON |NTERfiNTIONAL, I 14ORTON INTERNATIONAL, I NORTON INTERNATIONAL, N B S/LOMtY, INC. N S S/L(XJRY, INC. N B S/LOMtY, INC. NPG CORP. NPGCORP. P R W ASSOCIATES, INC. P N W ASSOCIATES, INC. PRICE COSTCO, INC. R V R PASCOE ENGINEERIN RANCHO CALIFORNIA kIATER RIVERSIDE CO. FIRE DEPT R]VERSIDE CO. FIRE DEPT RIVERSIDE C0. FIRE DEPT CITY OF TENECIJLA VOtJCXER/f3IECZ REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEN DESCEIPTION TAX STREET NTRIP!IIG PR614 RETENTION ON INVI M4 9~-17/0~ fiNY PLAN CHECK SERVS MtSERS' CONP FON NAY 95 APR PROGRESS Plfi-MINCHESTER lID, RELEASE OF RETENTION STOP NOTICE-CAL-iEST/FMILIAN RETENTION RELEASE FOR LOIIA LIN ANt PROGRESS PNT-PALA PARK ANt PROGRESS PI4T-PALA PARK RETENTION WH ON INV REOUEET 9 STOP NOTICES-J.R;NEGA EN;ACNE GRAPEVINE REUSLETTER PRINTING TAX MOOULARUNIT SETUP FOR FIRE ST FIRE IK)I)ULAR UNIT SETUP 30/5gaLs RED LEAD PAINT 12)/5gats WHITE PRE-MIX PAINT TAX 23/5gsts MHITE PRE-MIX PAINT TAX JAN 95 SURVEYING SERVS &DESIGN APR ENG & LAND SURVEY SERVS PRI(VIEV SITE GNN)ING COil ERERG ST REPAIRS ON DE P(ITOLA NAINBOV CYN POT HOLE REPA]RS APR 95 PROGRESS PI4T APR 95 PROGRESS PNI' 2ND N4T PER/COSTCO AGREE U/RDA ERERG GENENATON FOR CEC RELOCATE NETER I SAM HICK PRK HOSE APPLIANCES HOSE TOOLS HOSE, VARIOUS SIZES ACCOUNT NUlIBEIt 001-171-999-5~70 100-16&-601-S~10 100-2035 001-16)-999-57~9 001-1182 210-165-6~1-580& 210-203S zlo-zo3S 210-2035 210-190-120-580~ 210-190-120-5804, 210-20:55 210-2038 280-199-999-526~ 280-199-999-52(:4 001-171-~-5670 001 - 171-999-5479 100-1~4-~)1-5218 100-166-d4)1-5218 100-1~4-S01-5218 100-1(;4-601-5218 100-1e4-N)1-5216 210-199-120-5802 210-199-120-5802 210-199-120-5802 100-164,-601-5402 100-164-601-5402 280-199-999-5248 165-199-999-524,8 280-199-999-5276 210-190-1:59-5806 280-199-805-580~ 001-171-999-5470 001-171-999-S~7'0 001-111-999-54/0 ITEN /RUlT 93.77' 1,5~.15 154.41' 1,975.00 58.92- 3,206.50 10,4,85.08 9,372.51' 10,429.07 18,836.00 76,722.00 9,555.80' 23,915.99' 3,761.00 5,028.10 5,651.05 1,950.00 5,937.50 611.28 212.50- 16.67- 1,6.T4.16 1,452.56 6,)~.18 1,850.00 5,996.51 5,996.51 154,985.8& 5,218.00 9,441.67 863.26 PALE2 ONEQC NetIT 1,389.76 1,916.08 3,Z06.50 1 ,'112.57 10,629.07 62,0M.21 10,479.15 8,269.81 6,19&.18 11,99~.02 154,985.86 &,875 o00 5,218.00 VOUCHRE2 vLxJCHEPJ CHECK NUt!BElt 23927 23927 23927 23928 2:3929 23929 23930 23931 23932 2.3933 ?..39'3A 23935 3936 .J937 23937 2.3937 23937 23937 15:02 ClEC~ DATE 06/13/V5 06/13/~5 0(,/13/95 06/13/95 o6/13/95 0~/13/f5 06/13/95 06/13/95 o6/13/95 06/13/95 0~/13/95 o6/13/95 ~/13/~ ~/13/~ ~/13/95 ~/13/~ ~/13/~ ~/13/~ __n00~_,.67 000267 RIVERSIDE CO. FINE DEPT RIVERSINE CO. Flee DEPT RIVERSIDE CO. FINE DEPT RIVERSIDE CO. HEALTH SE RIVERSIDE CO. $HERIFF'S 000~06 RZVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S 000271 ROBERT BEIN, 144 FROST & 000958 ROBERT CARAN PRDDUCTION 001919 SENIOR CITIZENS SERVICE 000929 T B PENICI~ & SOIlS, INC. 0019~ TRANSTECH ENGINEERS, IN 000~59 TUMBLE JUNGLE 001474 000..~5 0003~.5 0007~5 000..~5 0003~5 VORTEX DATA SYSTENS, IN XEROX CORPORATION BILLI XEROX CORPORATION BILLI XEROX CORPORATION BILLI XEROX C~IIPORATIOR BILLI XEROX CORPORATION BILLI CITY OF TEMECIJLA VOUCHEe/CNECK NEGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITE!4 DESCRIPTION MIlD TOOLS NEDICAL SUPPLIES NISCELLANEOUS ITEMS FOR ENGINE MAR 95 ANIMAL CUNTROL NERVS AUTO CEIIIINAL IDENT SY$ FEB 95 BOOICING FEE(75 t 110.6) 14Nt 95 PROC~ESS PKr-IILCOTT CO 4TH JUL FIREMOItKS PeDDUCTIOR C:DBG NEIIIURSEMENT RETENTION RELEASE FOR CRC I1 PROGRESS PI4T-TRFF SONL DESION TCSO INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS NETVARE TRAINING 6/26-30:IIAFEL HS PB TRANSPARENCY 7032; IMAGING CART 5100 DEVELOPER 5100 FUSER TAX I. IIER O01-111-999-S&70 001-171-999-5&70 001-171-999-5&/0 001 - 172-999-5255 001-170-999-5325 001-1fi)-999-5273 210-165-637-5802 190-11G-999-5370 1/,0-199-999-5250 250-2lX55 210-165-659-580~ 190-18~-999-5330 320-199-999-5261 330-199-999-5220 330-199-999-5220 330-199-999-5220 33o-1~-~-522o 330 - 199-~- 5220 ITEN N4GUIIT 1,280.67 1,196:34 12,825 .T& 8,859.33 .- 18,076.lM 8,059.20 8,83/,°00 4,500,00 :5,331 .T3 1,28~.53 1,850. O0 1,108.80 1,995.00 153.90 271.00 86,17 PAE3 /ellleT 33,292.11 8,059.~ 26,135.26 .' 8,834~.Q0 4,5QQ,05 3,331,73 1,284, .53 1,850.Q0 1,108.80 1,995o(X) 1,1~.07 TOTAL CHECES ITEM 4 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Genie Roberrs, Finance Officer June 13, 1995 City Treasurer's Report as of April 30, 1995 PREPARED BY: Tim McDermott, Chief Accountant RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive end file the City Treesurer's Report as of April 30, 1995. "- DISCUSSION: Reports to the City Council regarding the City's investment portfdio and receipts, disbursements and fund balance are required by Government Code Sections 53646 and 41004 respectively. The City's investment portfolio is in compliance with the Code Sections as of April 30, 1995. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: 1. City Treasurer's Report as of April 30, 1995 2. Schedule of Assets, Liabilities, and Fund Equity as of April 30, 1995 cey of Tenecu City Treasurer's Report AsofApr a0,199S Cash Activity for the Month of April: Cash and Investments as of April 1, 1995 Cash Receipts Cash Disbursernents Cash and Investments as of April 30, 1995 : (1,646,811) $ 49,669,558 Cash and Investments Portfolio: Type of Inveatmem Petty Cash General Checking Benefit Demand Deposits Local Agency Investment Fund Deferred Compensation Fund Deferred Compensation Fund Defined Contdbution Fund Trust Aocounts-TCSD COPs Reserve Accoum-TCSD COPs Trust Accounts-RDA Bonds Construction Fund-RDA Bonds Reserve Account-RDA Bonds City Hall First Interstate First Interstate State Treasurer 5.960 % ICMA PEBSCO PEELSCO Bank of Amedca 5.657 BofA - Bayerische Landesbank 6.870 Bank of Amedca 5.657 BofA - Bayedsche Landesbank 6.210 BofA - Bayerische Landasban k 7.400 Balance $ 800 96,596 3,371 35,790,036 263808 304488 19938 12 928 502 690 339983 10,886 000 1,448,920 $ 49,669,558 (1) (1) (1)-This mount is nat of outstanding checks. Per Govemment Code Requirements, this Treasurer's Report is in compliance with the City of Temecula's investment policy and there are adequate funds available to meet budgeted and actual expenditures of the City of Temecula for the next thirty days. Rlalk "111 bfromotherknds Lendhddforreeele Irmedeeeet~e~ Totel e~et~ aly('l) ~ Agency $ ~e.,14s,ole I 1,BIO.Tll I le. eo4.esl ~,m~,m 125,092 i14,227 918.171 819,427 $ 38,,186,170 $ 1 ,e44,794 $ .' '~1,023.e27 Teal ~e22,74o ele,427 Liblithe: Duetoo~herNnds I 554,862 Other liebib 2,T78,084 lee,eso 3,332,eae 186.860 440,381 Fund equity: Contributed capital 1,055,344 Retained NuTdngs 95,944 Fund balances: Reseved (2) 2,777,729 Deeigi-,i~l ('3) 15,0e8,583 I.~dieignV-d 11,055,~4 egg,as4 5,844,8e6 0,31 e,448 622,09; 14,738,381 30,729,067 (158,003) 10,807,621 Total fund equity 30,083,224 1,457)44 I 33,3N,170 t 1,644.794 I Total liebib and lurid equity Si,Q$4,414 $ N,oa4,sel (1) Include Genead Fund, CAP Fund, Gas Tax Fund, other speci revenue funds, end defen'ed comp agency funds. (3) includeeamoume dedOnetedforeeemxnk~,debteevbe, and oonendng ePP,~,r' ITEM 5 APPROVAl CITY ATTORN CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer June 13, 1995 SUBJECT: Release Warranty, Labor and Material, and Subdivision Monument Securities in Tract No. 23160 PREPARED BY: Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council AUTHORIZE the release of Faithful Performance Warranty, Labor and Material, and Subdivision Monument Securities in Tract No. 23160,, and DIRECT the City Clerk to so advise the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, the Developer and the Surety. BACKGROUND: On March 6, 1990, the City Council approved Final Tract Map No. 23160. Agreements end Faithful Performance and Material Labor Bonds were filed by: Nicholas E. Tavaglione 3545 Central Ave., Ste. 200 Riverside, CA 92506 for the installation of street improvements, sewer and water systems, and subdivision monumentation. Accompanying the subdivision agreements were surety bonds issued by Amwest Surety Insurance Company as follows: Bond No. 1203078 in the amount of $105,000to cover street improvements. Bond No. 1203079 in the amount of $103,500to cover water system improvements. Bonds No. 1203078 end 1203079, in the amounts of $52,500 and $51,500, respectively, to cover material and labor amounts for street and water system improvements. Bond No. 1203080 in the amount of $1,000 to cover material and labor amount for sewer system improvements. The sewer system Faithful Performance security was a ~2,000 cash deposit. The Subdivision Monumentation is secured by a el ,100.00 cash deposit. The following items were completed by the developer in accordance with the approved plans: Required street, sewer, and water improvements within Tract No. 23160. On April 13, 1993, the City Council accepted the public improvements, reduced the Faithful Performance Bond amounts, initiated the one-year warranty period, and accepted a warranty bond in the contractual 10% amount as follows: Streets: Water System: Sewer System: Total: 10,500 10,350 200 ~21,050 The warranty period has run, any required repairs to the public improvements have been made, and no claims for labor and materials have been filed. Therefore Public Works Staff recommends release of the Faithful Performance warranty bond: Street, and water and sewer system improvements Bond No. 1203078-A $21,050 Also recommended for release are the Labor and Material bonds as follows: Street Improvements: Water System: Sewer System: Bond No. 1203078 Bond No. 1203079 Bond No. 1203080 ~52,500 51,500 1,000 Survey Monumentation for this map has been inspected and approved. Public Works Staff therefore recommends release of this security. Subdivision Monuments: County Cash Deposit $1,100 The fronting street for this development, a portion of Margarita Road, was included in the Riverside County Maintained-Road System prior to incorporation and accepted into the City Maintained-Street System by and at incorporation. Attachment: Location Map -2- r:.~ldq~95~O613~t43160 F, CT VlClkl ITY MAP TRACT NO. ?,3160 Loca~-n ITEM 6 TO: FROM: DATE: APPROVAl CITY ATTORN ~,~. / \U ~ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer June 13, 1995 SUBJECT: Substitute Public Facility Fee agreement and bond for PA94-0025 in Parcel Map No. 23624 : : PREPARED BY: Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer. RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council ACCEPT the substitute Public Facility Fee agreement and bond for pP 10579 and PP94-0025 in Parcel Map No. 23624, AUTHORIZE the release of the existihg agreement and bond on file, and DIRECT the City Clerk to so notify the several Developers and Sureties. BACKGROUND: On June 25, 1988, the Riverside County Planning Commission approved Rot Plan No. 10579, Amendment No. 1, subject to conditions, for the construction of a 179 unit hotel at the southwest corner of Rsncho California Road at Ynez Road. On March 13, 1989, the Riverside County Planning Director approved Plot Plan No. 10579, Revised Permit No. 1, to increase the approved motel units from 179 to 185, and increase building height. In the interim, City Council approved Parcel Map No. 23624 on February 12, 1991. This map included the existing hotel site (originally Doubletree Suites Hotel, now Embassy Suites Hotel). All required public improvements have been completed and the City Council released the Faithful Performance warranty bond on March 10, 1992. On March 30, 1994, the Developer applied for an expansion of the hotel to include two meeting rooms as PA94-0025. The Planning Director approved this expansion on April 14, 1994. Condition of Approval No. 46 required that an agreement and bond be posted for Public Facility Fees on the interim basis of $2.00 per square foot. Accordingly the Developer's surety, Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, posted the following bond: Bond No. 100869980-94-142in the amount of e6,060 The documents were executed by the Developer, KRDC, Inc., · California Corporation, and the City Manager and recorded December 22, 1994. r:%egdrpt%95~O613~mt23624P.S'/91AKC The new developer i~: Nesbitt Partners Temecule Venture, Ltd. 11835 W. Olympic Blvd,, Ste 1250 Los Angeles, CA 90064 The substitute security is posted by Reliance Insurance Company as follows: Bond No. B244 67 73 in the amount of ~6,060 as deposit or deposit against. the future public facility fee. This bond shall be retained until Public Facility Fees are determined and paid. FISCAL IMPACT; None ATTACHMFNTS: Location Map Public Facility Fee agreement and bond (On file) r:~egdrpt~gb"10613~lxn23624P.S791AKC PARCEL MAP NO. 23624 PLOT PLAN 10579 PP94-0025 Location Map Re¢orcling requested by, and When recorded mail to: City of.Teme~ule 43174 Buiness Park Drive Temecul8, CA 92590 Attn: .City Clerk AGREEMENT FOR PAYMENT OF PUBLIC FACILrI'Y FEE described as follows: Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein .by. reference Developer is the owner of r~d property tthe '~Opef;D/") in the City of Temecule e, Developer proposes to develop the Property pmua~tt tO'~el}~t,~~ ..... (the "Project" }, C. City has determined that the. Project w~l impact traffic and the demand for other public facilities within the City el identified in the r. ZZ~/~i(.~:t ~-~. :.:.for ..... 'the Project. These impacts must be mitigated by payment c~ a fee far additional road and public facility construction, which fee shall be identified as set forth hereinafter, .. '* Recording of this Agreement is tee exempt pursuant to Government Code; Section 6103 as i~ is recorded for the benefit of the City of Temecula. a p~C agency. -I- ':' '. .... D. The City proposes to impose · public facility fee upon' new developments within the .City in order to cormreact additional public facility improvements to serve turK! benef'~ rmw -developments, including the Project. Th~e fees shall be known as the "Temecula City-wide' Public Facility Fee Program* or *Public Facility .Fee.". E: Condhion No. 46 -of d-.e-~oject requires-that Developer axecute this Agreement prior to lealance of · bu;|ding permit or conditional use permit, or re~ordation of me final rrmp. ,e p,o de'* 'sp fk ally h the condtUon, of F. In order for Developer to proceed withoutfull payment of th~ Public Pec~ty Fee in 8 Timely manner, City and Developer have determined to en~e/into this Agreement-. G. The term 'public facility' shall refer to public and municipal irffi-asttuctute, mJch as roads, highways, floOd control fad. lides, city 'hell, police s~ations, Community ;hintere,." theaterS, patios and similar.. public infr.~slruCtLfe.- . NOW. THEREFORE;the parties hereto agree as follows: publict FaciliTy {a) - THe+ City Council wilLeStablish'the amount of the Public Facility Fee at some time in the futurej -The Fee Wlii be based upon ~e square footage of each development, the vehicle trips gen.-ral:ad by each development' or similar mea..~ure{s)- The Public Facility Fee also mhali establish the specific improvements to be constPacted..and their co~t, the benefit assessment area and the method by which the fair share, pro-rata obligations of each prOPertY are to be established based on impact on traffic and demand for public factties. (b) Developer shah pay the Public Facility Fee on each building at such time it receives it~ certificate of. occupanc'/or final inspection, which ever occurs (c} The Councii atsc may establish an Interim Public Facility Fee ~c ~,e followed by a Fin9-[ ,;hjbiic Facility Fee. if only ~he. interim Pul31ic F3cili~y Fee has be~n eatsbrushed at th= .time the DeveloPer seeks issuance of its cirti~cetm of occulancy or fine| inspection, ~dchever occurl firit, men Developer Shaft pay the Interim Feeprior to issuance ' of the certificate of occupancy or fi~sl Inspection, W"hi~hever occurs fffst- Later, when the FilqII-PMI)!iC Wecirlty Fee' is established, the Developer wl~ be-mimbureed for any difference between the Interim and Final he if the Interim he exceeds .the !:i"l'Fee, end she1/pay the shortfall ff the Final Fee e--v~-eeds the interim Fee, (d) "If the certificate of occupancy or final inspection ~ccurs prior .to the eStabliShment of the Iresrim or Final Pubr~ Fecir~y Fee:alton the Developer shall lay a deposit of Two Dollars ($2,00) por square foot, not T0 'eXCeed Ten Thousand pallare (110,000)lylor . .' h- · may be provided in lieu of the depofdt, . ...... ·-*--:,-:" ;. .......... ~ ..... (e) If either the Rnal or Interim public Facility ~ee is e,qtabllshed after the issuarr, e of the certificate of occupen{~/or find Inspection, the Developer =hali paythe Interim or Fmat Pubtic-FecJ'litY Fee. ten (10i days after receiving no.rice'frOm the' City'that it him been tXablished, .. (f) NOtwithstanding the above, Developer stroll provide City with written notification of the opening of any e~crow for the ~ie of the Project arid shall provide In the · escrow instructlone*that if the Interim or Final Public Fac~'iity Fee has been established; the Fee shall be Mid to the'City frc, m the sale proceeds in. esCrow Ixior. to distribLrling the proceeds to Developer/:seller, (g) City shall'record a release of this. Agreement upon payment of all Public Facility Fees owing end shall provide Developer with a copy of SUch release- 2, Use of PMI)Jic FacilitY Pet: The Public Facility' Fee collected pursuiint to this Agreement shall be used only to Ccf~IrdCt CiTy-wide traffic and public facility im~ovements, which improvemere are deemed to be of benslit to Proje~ and for exl0e~ incide~tai thereto. There is a r~aaonable relationship between th~ Project and ,,he Public Faciiity Fee in that the Project will impact traffic and existing pUbl!c...faciiirise, end conreequently, w~ql require expansion of ~he City-wide street end highway system, end S}ubiic facilities in order to meet the added demand resulting from t'he Project. The 8rnaum of ~he Public Facility Fee to be .... ~ollectod from Project' fopresents the cost of facilities rtecessaflt To meet the incremental' increase ir~ Traffic and demand for public facilities reaulting from the Project, "' 3: ~farmatiot~ Provided: Developer shall ixovide to City, uDOn CiCY~S request - therefor, any end all information regarding access to the Project, traffic flow, trip generation factors end such other information as is reasonably necessary to establish the Public Facility 4. j~-z3-ritv for Public FaqiJirv Fee; - - . .... {a) If the Interim or Final PubJiG Facility Fee has been established prior to .' 'asseerie of a beading permit or other entitlement described in Recital E, then, concurrent with - the execution of this Agreement, Developer shell Ixovide an irrev{~cable letter of wedit ar other form of seCuH~ aplxoved by City, in a form approved by the City Attorney, in an amount equal to the total' Public Facility Fee for the Project, The amount of security may be increased upon City'$ request should Thee be an increase in the amount of .the .R~lic FacJTrty Fee. The amount of security else may be' ~educed upon Developer'S payment of Public Fac:3i~f Fees outstanding. However, except for the deposit provided for in Section 1, red letter of credit is required if neither the )nterim or Final Public FaCility Fee has nOT bean established as 0f..the date of execution of thia Agreement. -- ...... |hi As an sitemotive to collecting the fee from the letter of credit, if the Developer fails to lay the Public Facility Fee within thirty {30) days of the'~l.ets demand is made, the City may assess a penalty of tan I~rcent (10%) of the am~ ewing and make said Fee, inclusive of penal:t~: e lien upon the described reel property by recording a noti¢~ that said Fee is dt~e under the terms of tl-~s Agreement with the_County Recorder of Cm.q'rty. The notice shell state the fact that =aid Fee, inclusive of penalty, is due under the terms of thi3 Agreement and shell s~ate the amOunt, together with the fact that it is unpaid end draws interest on the Fee and penalty at the rate set forth et California Revenue Ta~cation Section 19269 until paid. '(c) The City may is an alternative to {he lien procedure set forth above. bri~',cJ legal ec',ion T.G collect the Public Fecility Fee due. The Developer agrees that if Jegai action by the City is necessary to cdiect the Fee the Dsvsioper agrees reasonable sum as s~orney's tees and cour~ costs, toga[her with penalty and in~efes~ determined-according to Paragraph 4(b) of this Agrgement. 5, Aareemem Runs With ! end: This Agreement pertair~ to and mrm with the PrOperty, This Agreement binds the successors in interest of each of the parties. 6. WeivWr:' ' lily execution o~this Agreement, Developer waives any right to" protest the provisions of Condition No, 46 of the .Project, this Agreement, th~ formation of any Public Fac:il'rty fee d~trict, but nOt. the rexus between any hblio Fadlity fee end the 7, Rindinn An.reemerrt: .~s Developer'= messore End assigns. Agreement shall be bindEng upon Developer, 8, Ameprlment/No'.Con~D~ W,eive~: This Agreement my be modifiecl.or amended only in writing, signed by both parties.-This Agreement Gontm ti~' fU!.! and complete understandih~ 'of the parties and supersedes any 'and el! pdor ors! 0t written ' agreements of rem'eBentetiorm, A waiver of any term or condition of mis Agtlement by either · party shall not be deemed a continuing waiver thereof. - : 9. Attorneys' Fee~: Should ellher' party determine that it is neGessary to file · legal action to enforce or interpret the provisions of this ~greernent,'the prevailing party in That litigation shall be e,,i;~;ed to its reasonable costs, including but not limited to attorneys' fees, 10," Notice: Notice shall be deemed 9ivan un.:cler this Agreement.when in writing end deposited in the United States mail, first-class, portage prepaid, addressed es follows: ' CITY: City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 Atln: City Clerk DEVELOPER: Nesb!tt Partners Temeou~a ~ture, c/o Windsor Capital Group, -TnC- i,T, 835 W. Ol.~-~.pic Blvd., Suite !25C Los Angeles, CA 90064 Ltd. obligedaM m Joint end several. 6. Replacement of Prior Agreement If them is mote then one {1) diner of this Agreement as Developer, their -.=.-:.--- · , . :~ .. ...... 7 -- IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the,. parties or their duly authorlzed'repre.eentatives have executed-this Agreement ss af ths dsts set out-above. CTTY OF TEMECUtA Ronald E,. Bedicy City Manage' ATTEST: DEVELOPER Nesbitt Partners Temec'~la Venture, L~d 1'" limited partnership S.'Cal~forn~a Walnut T~l~ en~nra+4~n. a California Corporation 3Une $. Greek, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: 'Peter Thorson, City Attorney *Th~s A~reement ~s executed to replace. the prior Agreement for Paymen~ of ..... Public Facility Fee ~ecorded December 22, 1994 as Instrument No. 474396. KRDC, Inc. (The Developer under such prior Agreement) is hereby relievedoff its obligations under such prior Agreement. EXHIBIT 'A" Parcel 1'of Parcel. Map No. 23624, as shown by map on file in Book 169 of Parcel· Maps at. pages 24 through 26 thereof, Records.of Riverside County, California. ', a Notary ~ublic in endSpersonally "7,?'.z-,s 6 ' deer'-..-.. 1, :~ ..... , [u ,,,,. (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/ere subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/hoNtheir authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/r,.,/tI,Ji signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which fie persen(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS~nd and o icial seal. . . Signature/~-f-~'~/F'~/~ // FOR NOTARY SEAL OR STAMP STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF On appeared , before me, , a Notary Public in and for said County and State, personally personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the persen(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(lea), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. ,~. Signature FOR NOTARY SEAL OR STAMP This form is furnished by Chicago Title Company cry OF TTMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBUC WORKS Tfe~I:No. I'erceIMepNo, NeFf anNe. 10~79 Bo~dlNM. B244 67 73 R'&ak'.a $121.00 Nesbitt Partners : 8ueltT Reliance lqsuj;anre CD"tP~RT-Pt~ ,TemeC..ula Vent~re- Address 580 Califor_nia Street Ad~ 11 R.~ W.OlymDi~ -Blvd., Ste. ~ San Francisco, CA 94104 ~ Los Ancreles,. CA qO~364.. 1250 .-nk~gatjon of'such imps=t; end, WHeRF. AS. r, ursuan~ to ~ agrtement, PrinciNI is required to delx~ $ 6,0 6 0.0 0 ~ dep;ai~ 8gsinst ~e futu,e puMi~ feelr~ NOW, ~[~. we, ~ ~ ~ Reliance lns-r~-ce Sixty and No/100 - i _ OO~'(% 6,060.0~ ) l~mly ~y ~R ~mnU. . .. ~ c~i~m of ~is obEgsti~ is ~ch tMt if t~ sbM-b~ ~1, ~, aM well she ~V keep and N~o~ ~ coverms. c~ti~ s~ agreement a~ an~ B~erMtio~ thereof ~de ss ~re~ ~e~. o~ ke~ aM ~rfor~ at the time in ~ ma~er the~in s~ed. and in aN r~ NO~di~ to ~hei~ t~e intent and meshing, ~ ~all i~em~fy and ~ ha~lefl agents 3~ employee, as t~rein stipulated, ~ INs o~igs~n ~1~ ~ome ~! e~ v~d; omerwise it sM!l ~ and remain in ~dl force a~ effect. Am 8 part of the obligation secured hereby and in adcritWn to the face amount specified thererex, there ~ be included costs and reasonable exianses and fees. Including attofney'a fees, incurred by the City in S~;CCl aefully enforcing Such obligation, all to be taxed IS costs and included in may Judgment rendered. · ..... The SLeety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of or add;ti~n to h terms of 'the '~memefit'shatl'in any way affect h3 obligothx~ on this bot~, and it d~es hereby waive notice of any such change. exterkion of time. alteration or addition to the te~Tt/Of'~the ogressent. 8wety further stipulates and m0teas that the preylakes of Section 2846 Of the Civ~ Code n not e"ccx~iUon precedent to the Surety's obligations hueundo' end ere hereby waived by the Surety- When the meluied payment covered.. by ~he eFeement is made, the City will mlem the oblOfdon of this Ixmd. _~. NA~AE OF PRINCIPAL: Nesbltt Partners Temeculm Ventn~f - I.td., AUTHORIZED 81GNATURE(~ BY: a. California ~ted D~rtne~shID Wal~ut~~n · . ~tF CORPORATION; AFFIX $EAU NAME OF SURETY: AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE: Reli e I ur_ance C p~n .. r~e (IF CORPORATION, AFFIX SF, AL) ATI ACH NOTARIAL ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SIGNATURE OF PRINCIPAL AND ATTORI~Y- IN-FACT. TOTAL P. lo CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT No, m, , Cc)urlty of kl.ameda C)N May 3, 1995 before me, Sharon Le Tendre . personally apl:)tired ]~rbs~8 L. Si~!.~e . NHdE(8)CWM [] personally known to me - OR - [] proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s)is/are subscribed to the within instrument and'ac-' knowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same .'in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the'instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. OPTIONAL Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form. CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT [] INDIVIDUAL [] CORPORATE OFFICER TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT Tm.E{S) [] PARTNER(S) [] UMITED [] GENERAL [~ ATI'ORNEY-IN-FACT [] TRUSTEE(S) [] GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR [] OTHER: NUMBER OF PAGES DATE OF DOCUMENT SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE 01993 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION · 8236 lawNnet Ave., P,O. Box 7184 · Canogl Park, CA 91300-7184 RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY HEAD ~FFICE. PHILADELPHIA. PENNSYLVANIA' POWER OF ATTORNEY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, That the RELIANCE NSURANCE COMPANY, a c:eporation duly organized under h laws of tit Stm of P;.Y,e~nia, does hereby make, constitute and appoint Bad·re Shine, i, dSda~-~y, of Pie·ante, Celloelk its true end law~ Attmney~|-in-Fact, to hake. execute, seal and ddivm' for and on its behalf, and u its act and deed any and lit bonds and u~dl.lakjnOs c surety·hip end to bind the RFJJANCE NSURANCE COMPANY there u fuly and to the some extent Is if such bonds Ifld madetakings an other wridngs obligam~ in the nature theeof were signed by an Executive Officer of the RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY and sealed a~ attested by o418 Othlr Of such offloll. ancI hlfd)y fadties ·rid ¢o(lfkllls dl that its said Atlx)~lly(s)-ki-Flct my do in Ixarsuance hateof. This Power of Attorney is granted ufder and by authority of Article VII of 1he By-Laws of RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY whk became effective hpte../0Br 7. 1978. which prodsions ore now in full force and effect. rasdin0 as follows: ARTICLE VIi - EXECUTION OF BONDS AND UNDERTAKING 1. The Board of 0 kectm. the Pmidem. the Chakman of lhe Boarcl. any Senior V'me President. any Yme Prnklem er Asdctam Vk Preddent Or other off, xrdasignmed by the Board of I:Hrectm shal have power and authority to (a) appoint Anant~s)-k-Fm and? ~biga1xxYinthenatur~there~f~and(b)toremveanYsuChAn~rnw(~|~M~Fact~anvtimeandrev~kethep~wa~dauemdtYgivenmthew 2. Att~rney(sNn.Facsshai~havep~werandauth~ritY~subiectt~thetefms·ndqi~tM;~F~oftheP~wer~fAtt~meyissUedt~them~ executo and ddiver on behdf of the Company, bonds and urde if/~3s, fecegn~ mrices, contracts of ixtesmi~snd oU'srwfidngs eelgslm~ the future thereof. The ccNlmrm fad;- not neceuafy for lie vaidity of any bonds end trade. inking·, rsc,.,~ir~.a._o,,.,,.,~__, centraN of indemni- andotherwfidngsoblgltmyinThenmumlhweof. 3. Attorney(s)-in-Fact shall have power and 8uthority to execute afficlav~ required to be attached to boricis. recogn& I~__-_~. contrBcts, C-,cx~'X~m,Nmkdtocol:~esoftrmBy4awsofll~~oraf~faorBm:don~U'lerlof. .. ThisP~werofAtt~rneyissignedandseadedbyfacsknieundermndbyauth~dtY~f~thef~U~wingRes~iuti~nad~ptedbytheB~arddDirect~- of RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY at · meetre0 hedd an the 5th day of June, 1979, at which · Quorum was presem, af~d said Resoknk has not been amended or repeNed: 'Resolved that the signatures of such directors and officers and the seat of the Company may be affixed to* any such Power of Attorney or any ~ relating thereto by facsimile, and ·ny such Power of Attorney or cv tff'ute bearing such facsimik signatures or facsindle sed sham be vatdand binding upon the Company·rid any such Power soexecuted raspect to any bond or unde taLk:0 to which it is attoched. ' IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY and its corporate seal to be hereto affixed, tNs 16 STATE OF Washington COUNTY OF King -. On this 16 day of December, 1993 personally appeared Lewfence W, Cadstrom to me known to be the Vice Pesident of the RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY, and ·cknovdedged that he executed and attested the cotlN~ ' that Article VII, Section 1, 2, and 3 of the 8y4.aws of ss Company,and the Resolution, set forth therein, are still in ': ~ PUBUC ~ ~ Not.,~ P.bUc i. end for s.to of w, ~-,vto. · 8- I, R~ ~, As~ S~ of ~ R~N~E ~ ~ ~ ~ c~ ~ of a Power of AUorMy exeMe ~ s~ ~~, ~ b ~ b ~ f~ ~ effe~. fN~ESSWHEREOF, l~e~moset~aMaMa~hsealofnM~mH~Ss 3~d d~of ~ 199~ Assistant SecYetaty BOR-1431 Ed, 3.t3 ITEM 7 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAl CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager . Joseph Kicek, Director of Public Works/City Engineer June 13, 1995 Release Subdivision Monument Bondin Parcel Map No. 23624 PREPARED BY: Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer. RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council AUTHORIZE release of the Subdivision Monument Bond in Parcel Map No. 23624, and DIRECT the City Clerk to so notify the Developer and Surety. :. BACKGROUND: The City Council approved Parcel Map No 23624 on February 12, 1991, and entered into a subdivision agreement for the one-year warranty period as the full improvements had previously been satisfactorily completed. Therefore only a Faithful Performance warranty bond was required for the public improvements. A subdivision monument bond was also required. The warranty bond and the Monument Bond were posted by the surety, Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company, as follows: Bond No. 3S 743 878 O0 in the amount of $38,500to cover Faithful Performance warranty for street, water and sewer improvements. Bond No. 3S 7zd 891 00 in the amount of $9,500 to cover subdivision monumentation. The City Council released the Faithful Performance warranty bond on March 10, 1992. Public Works Staff has inspected and approved the Subdivision Monumentation end recommends the release of the Subdivision Monument Bond. The public streets fronting this development, Rancho California Road, Ynez Road, and Rancho Highland Drive, have been accepted into the City Maintained-Street System. FISCAL IMPACT: None. ATTACHMENT: Location Map r:.%agdrpt~95%0613t4~m23624m.one/AKC Project ~ite , \\ PARCEL MAP NO. 23624 Location Map ITEM 8 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Council/City Manager r/.Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer June 13, 1995 Completion and Acceptance of the Construction of Pala Road @ HWY-' 79S Interim Right Turn Lane, Project No. PW94-08 PREPARED BY: ~; Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects Scott Harvey, Associate Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council accept the Construction of Pala Road ~ HWY 79S Interim Right Turn Lane, Project No. PW94-08, as complete and direct the City Clerk to: File the Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a one (1) year Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract, and Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after the filing of the Notice of Completion if no liens have been filed. BACKGROUND: On November 29, 1994, the City Council awarded a contract for the Construction of Pala Road @ HWY 79S Interim Right Turn Land, Project No. PW94-08, to Pro-Civil Engineering, Inc. for $40,590.47. The work that was performed included, construction of asphalt pavement, traffic striping and signing, embankment construction, and traffic control to construct a right turn lane for traffic proceeding on Route 79 "South" to south on Pala Road. The Contractor has completed the work in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and within the allotted contract time to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The construction retention for this project will be released on or about thirty-five (35) days after the Notice of Completion has been recorded. !m'O4/r:,~qdt~O613~m~J.-O~,l~ FISCAL IMPACT: The contract amount for this project was ~40,590.47. Contract Change Orders No. I and No. 2 were approved by the City Manager in the amount of 63,951 .46. The total cost of the -project .will decrease due to a change in the final bid quantities of $2,327.21, bringing the total project cost to ~42,214.72. This project is a Capital Improvement Project and is being funded from Development Impact Fees. Attachment: Notice of Completion Maintenance Bond Contractor's Affidavit pwO4/r:.~k3~t~gS~(M13~Tw94-Ot.~c CffYCLERK Cfi'YOFI'~I~CU~IL 42174 ~ Pink ~ Temeoub, CA B2EBO 8PACEABOVETliIUNEFOR RECORDBYIUeE NOTICE OF COMPLETION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT: 1. The City of Temecula is the owner of the property hereinafter described. 2. The full address of the City of Temecuis b 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula, Califomis 92590. 3. A Contract was awarded by the City of Temecula to Pro-Civil Engineering, Inc. to perform the following work of improvement: PW94-08 - Pala Road and Route 79 South Interim Improvement~ 4. Said work wa~ completed by said company according to plans and spacffications and to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works of the City of TeNcub and that said work was accepted by the City Coundl of the City of Temecule at a regular meeting thereof held on June 13, 1995. That upon Mid contract the Amwe~t Surety Insurance Company was surety for the bond give~ by the said company as required by law. 5. The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, and is described as follows: PROJECT PW 94-08. Dated at Temecula, California, this day of ,1995. STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY OF TEMECULA JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, Califomia and do hereby certify under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing NOTICE OF COMPLETION is true and correct, and that said NOTICE OF COMPLETION was duly and regularly ordered to be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder of Riverside by said City Council. Dated at Temecula, Califomis, this day of .1995. JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk IFridnY June 2, 1995 3:55pm -- Free ,90~890860' -- Page 2i RHIdEST I D: 9098890860 · 3UN 02'95 15:39 No.O06 P.02 I I I i I I .- % 268 . ~ ~ t206 //AME~'~ OF-_qIRLIY · herelrmftar ullml ~, ere held md IImiybemd urA9 ~ OF TEMECULA,. hBrBilTlftBrl3111111dO~ER,blthlBIN!rlBIIUl~Of tl'onn q~T(']iU.qAlklTj .4hxTTA&AAAAAAA&AA'&A&AAAAAAAAAA* AAAA&AAA&AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA'AAAA&~AAAAAA DOIeLaRIR~ ~AAkt&AAij&&IAAAAAAAAAAAA CI~'T'8(~ · nGp ~n )inllwfulr~elyofthlUnllld~alBI, ferlhBIlYnlarltd THE CONDITION OFTHIS OBLIGATION Is much that whema& the Pfinctpd entered Into e ,Jet, Contract with the OWNER, dated the 291h day el leoFeast, .19 94 ~, · coPY of which hi hereto attached and made ·pm, t hereof for the conmnmles of FROJEbvr IIO, IWrJ! ee PALA ROAD AND ROUTE 11 SOUTH !E/laaM r qt ;;.OVBlaeTL WI.fiEREAS, add Contact Ixovldes that the Pindid wll tumbh · bond .cFxfitlened te gin'mac for the period of u ve~ after ep.Fovd .f the end ee~Mta en said ]ob. by the OWNER, mgim I a~ defects in wodmmnd, dp and matadds which mary, beeore8 8ppaflm; dudfig laid period; 8rid NOW, THEREFORE, THE CONDI'rtON OF THIS OBU UGH, thBt ff withbl ~ylar 'from Contract, or It slM appear ~ drlacttve ma=~ thereunder, tlln ltts allgallon i shah remain In full force and virtue, othmwla this InsUlanent ahdl be void. M-I iFriday June 2, 1F}5 3:551a -- Free ,~0~88~8~0' -- Page 3i ~HMEST ID: 9098890860 3UN 02'95 15:40 No.006 P.03 61gnodBrxlse~led~hb 02 ..dsyd · is 95. APPROVE) AS TO FORM: Thorson, City Attorney IFridmy June 2. 1~5 3:55m -- Free '~g~___, -- Page &l RHUr,.ST ZD: 9098890860 3UN 02 ' 95 ' :ATTORNEY "L[NI]TED:~ P0% .. : :: bmmdkemikesdksemnbd--af - ~, .' ivava 4ttt III it I 41 · lee 15:40 'No .006 P .04 IFrjday June 2, 1995 3:55pe -- Frem '90988908~' -- Page 51 RHIdEST 1 g: 9098890860 AAmwest 3UN 02'95 15:41 No.O06 P.05 NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGMENT On 612/95 bekarem._ C.H. DOUGLAS .. (hemkumwtmlmo). Nmry P. bUc. pc, maY .ppa"ed ~.AT DOL,m which N person(s) acted, er~ '~d the !nmunmnL ....: " - [] ,kDvnw.m) [] pN~rnea~s) t"i aak. kt~%~qcua~ATea Ax~-rr .,merry t'J CCtIq:IIATE _,. L'~AITIXIEY INFACT eracram UmuS~EE(9 D mxsc.. -:;r,m ' ' THIS CEFI'I'IFIC,,ATE IA.JST BE ATTACHED TO THE DOCUMENT DESCRIBED Nand~dPeemc __.----~ " HERInN:. CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT AND RNAL RELEASE .... PROJECT NO. PW94-o8 ' PALA ROAD AND ROUTE 79 SOUIN INTERIM IMPROVEMENT$ all materials, supplies, labor, services, tools, equipment, and all other bills contracted for by the I Contractor with regard to the building, erection, Construction, or repair of that certain work of improvement known as PROJECT NO. PW94-08 PALA ROAD AND ROUTE 79 SOUTH ~ IMPROVE~ZENTS situated in the City of Temeculs, State of California, more particularly described I as feller:s: ** I INSERT TITLE OF WORK HERE ' The Contractor declares that it knows of no unpaid debts or claim arising out of said I Contract which would constitute grounds for any third party to claim a stop notice against of any unpaid sums owing to the Contractor. :. Further, in connection with the final payment of the Contract, the Contractor hereby disputes the following amounts: Description Dollar Amount to Dispute Pursuant to Public Contracts Code 57200, the Contractor does hereby fully release and acquit+ the City of Temecula and all agents and employees of the City, and each of them, from any and all claims, debts, demands, or cause of action which exist or might exist in.favor of the Contractor by reason of payment by the City of Temecula of any contact amount which the Contractor has not disputed above. CONTRACTOR Dated: -~" 2- 7 "~ ~'~ By:- and T:tls ¢.,,-~-. RELEASE R-1 r:~dp~lsr~njwM ~lJw94~ eke . * , ITEM 9 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer June 13, 1995 Completion and Acceptance of the Traffic Signal Installation @ Margarita Road & Avertida Barca, Project No. PW93-10 PREPARED BY: Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects Scott Harvey, Associate Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council accept the Construction of a Traffic Signal Installation @ Margarita Road & Avenida Barca, Project No. PW93-10, as complete and direct the City Clerk to: File the Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a six (6) month Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract, and Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after the filing of the Notice of Completion if no liens have been filed. BACKGROUND: On December 13, 1994, the City Council awarded a contract for Traffic Signal Installation @ Margarita Road & Avenida Barca, Project No. PW93-10, to Macadea Electrical Construction for $81,849.00. This project provided the intersection of Margarita Road and Avenida Barca a 4-way fully actuated traffic signal. The Contractor has completed the work in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and within the allotted contract time to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The construction retention for this project will be released on or about thirty-five (35) days after the Notice of Completion has been recorded. irwO4/r:.~gdtpt%9S~OO13~m~-lOacc 051~ FISCAL IMPACT: The contract amount for this project was ~81,849.00. Contract Change Orders No. I and No. 2 was 8pproved for a total amount of $7,314.65. The total construction cost is $89,163.65. This project is a Capital Improvement Project and is being funded from the Surface Transportation Program (STP). Attachment: Notice of Completion Maintenance Bond Contractor's Affidavit pwO4/r:.tagd~tl9~O613~2~Jr3-10.ecc RE(~RDIN(] REQUEb~I~D BY AND RETURN TO:. CITY ClERK crrY OFTEMECULA 43174 Budnee Peek Drive Tommale, CA 92590 SPACE NOTICE OF COMPLETION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT: 1. The City of Temecula is the owner of the property hereinafter described. 2. The full address of the City of Temecula is 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California 92590. 3. A Contract was awarded by the City of Temecula .to MACADEE ELECTRICAL CONSTRUCTION to perform the following work of improvement: PW93-10 TRAFRC SIGNAL AND SAFETY UGHTING INSTALLATION O MARGARITA ROAD AND AVENIDA BARCA 4. Said work was completed by said company according to plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works of the City of Temecula and that said work was accepted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on June 13, 1995. That upon said contract the GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY was surety for the bond given by the said company as required by law. 5. The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, and is described as follows: PROJECT PW 93-10. 6. The street address of said property is: MARGARITA ROAD AND AVENIDA BARCA. Dated at Temecu. la, California, this _ day of · 1995. STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) CITY OF TEMECULA ) ss JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California and do hereby certify under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing NOTICE OF COMPLETION is true and correct, and that said NOTICE OF COMPLETION was duly and regularly ordered to be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder of Riverside by said City Council. Dated at Temecula, California, this day of · 1995. JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk Porms/C!P-iX)l Rev. 12-5-91 pwO4~pwg3-10%cornlDletn.not 051595 ~OND .NUMBER: 70092nl CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS EP RTMENTpERFORMANCE BOND D A PRFJ.,!IUH INCLUDED IN MAINTENANCE BOND PROJECT NO. PW93-10 TRAFRC SIGNAL AND SAFETY LIGHTING IIVST. a# f 4 T!ON, MARGARITA ROAD AND A VENIDA BARCA KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE .PRESENTS THAT: MACADEE ELECTRICAL CONSTRUCTION - 14771 CHERRY CIRCLE - CHINO HILLS, CA 91709 NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR -' a INDIVIDUAL , hereinafter called Principal, and fell in whetl~er · Corl;oraubn, Partnership or ~diw'dual/ GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE COHPANY - THE CITY DRIVE. SOU.TH-~3nn/ORANGE, CA NAM~ AND ADDRESS OF SURETY hereinafter called SURETY. are held ~nd rarely bound unto CITY OF TEMECULA, harein·fter cslled OWNER, i~ the l~ttal surn of EIGHT THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED-' ~GHTY-FOURDOU_aJt$ and 90 CENTS ($ 8,1R4.90--) in lawful money of the United States, for the payment of which sum well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents, THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION is such that whereas, the Principal entered into a certain Contract with the OWNER, dated the 3RD day of HAY , ,19 95 , a. copy of which herqto attached and made a part hereof for the construction of PROJECT NO, PVV93-10TRAF~ SIGNAL AND SAFETY UGHTING INSTALLATION, MARGARITA ROAD AND AVENIDA BARCA. WHEREAS, said Contract provides that the PHncipai will furnish a bond conditioned to guarantee for the period of six months after approval of the final estimate on aid job, by the OWNER, against all defects in workmanship and materials which may become apparent during aid pe.riod; and WHEREAS, the said Contract has been completed, and was approved on 19 95 . APRIL 13 NOW, THEREFORE, THE CONDITION OF THIS OBUGATION IS SUCH, that if within six months from the date of approval of the said Contract, the work done under the terms of said Contract. It shall appear that defective materials were furnished thereunder, then this obligation shall remain in full force and virtue, otherwise this instrument shall be void. MAINTENANCE BOND M-1 r:~,~r~je~s~wg3-10~idl}kg% ekO CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACXNOWLEDGMENT .',~ s9o: State of CALIFORNIA County of SAN BERNARD~ On MY 3, 1995 before me, KEL&Y A. ~, NOTARY PUBLIC OATE ~ TITLE OF OFFICER - E.G.. 'JANE 0DE. NOTARY PUBLIC' personally appeared JAY P. FREEMAN , NAME(S) OF SIGNER{S} ~ personally known to me - OR - [] proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person/r-)-whose name(s-)-is/:~ro subscribed to the within instrument and ac- knowledged to me that he/cho/thcy executed the same .in his/hcr/thoir auth'orized KELLY A. SAlTMAN ;~ capacity(-i-s6-), and that by hislhor.'thoir "*'*'***""""******""'"'*""'" signature(c} on the .-instrument the person(6-)-, .o^r~ .c.u~oe.,A or the entity upon behalf of which the ~e~eeeeeeeeeeeelleeeeeeeeeeee WITNESS~/~ny hand. and official ,seal. OPTIONAL Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the dQcurnent and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form. CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER LJ INDIVIDUAL [] CORPORATE OFFICER [] PARTNER(S) [] LIMITED [] GENERAL [] A'R'ORNEY-tN-FACT [] TRUSTEE(S) [] GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR [] OTHER: DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT BOt'~ TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT NUMBER OF PAGES 5~3/95 DATE OF DOCUMENT SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: NAME OF Pt, RSON(S) OR GREAT AMERI CAN INSURANCE COMPANY SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE {)1993 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION · 8236 Re~u~et Ave.. P.O. Box 7184 · Canoga Park. CA 91309-7184 G1EAT AIVERIC- I INSURANCE COMPANY 580 WALNUT STREET * CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202 * 513-369-5000 * FAX 513-723-2740 The number of persons authorized by this power of attorney is not more than No. 0 13603 POWER OF ATTORNEY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Ohio, does hereby nominate, constitute and appoint the person or persons named below its true and lawful attorney-in-fact, for it and in its name, place and stead to execute in behalf of the said Company, as surety, any and all bonds, undertakings and contracts ofsuretyship, or other written obligations in the nature thereof; provided that the liability of the said Company on any such bond, undertaking or contract of suretyship executed under this authority shall not exceed the limit stated below. Name Address Limit of Power JAY P. FREEMAN BOTH OF BO~I'I KELLY A. SAlTMAN ONTARIO, UNLIMITED CALIFORNIA This Power of Attorney revokes all previous powers issued in behalf of the attorney(s)-in-fact named above. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY has caus.ed these presents to be signed and attested by its appropriate officers and its corporate seal hereunto affixed this 27t:h day of January ,19 95 Attest GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY STATE OF OHIO, COUNTY OF HAMILTON -- ss: On this 27t:h day of January, 1995 , before me personally appeared GARY T. DUNBAR, to me known, being duly sworn, deposes and says that he resided in Cincinnati, Ohio, that he is the President of the Bond Division of Great American I nsu rance Company, the Company described in and which executed the above instrument; that he knows the seal; that it was so affixed by autho/""x, of his office under the By-Laws of said Company, and that he signed his name thereto by like authority. ~' · ..--- · . .__ '- . 'L-. ;. -..' .; .L~. This Power of Attorney is granted by authority of the following resolutions adopted by the Board of Directors of'Great American Insurance Company by unanimous written consent dated March I, 1993. RESOLVED: That the Division President. the several Division Vice Presidents and Assistant Vice Presidents, or any one of them, be and hereby is authorized. from time to time, to appoint one or more Attorneys-in-Fact to execute on behalfof the Company, as surety, any and all bonds. undertakings and contracts o~ suretyship, or other written obl~ations in the nature thereot~ to prescribe their respective duties and the respective limits of their authority; and to revoke any such appointment at any time· RESOLVED FUR THER: That the Company seal and the signature orany of the aforesaid officers and any Secretary or Assistant Secretary of the Company' may be affixed by facsimile to any power of attorney or certificate or either given rot the execution of any bond, underink ing, contract or suretyship, or other written obl~ation in the nature thereof, such signature and seal when so used bein8 hereby adopted by the Company as the ordinal s~nature of such oflTcer and the original seal orthe Company, to'be i~alid and 'bihding upon the Company with the same force and effect as though manually affixed. CERTIFICATION 1, RONALD C. HAYES, Assistant Secretary of Great American Insurance Company'. do hereby certify that the foregoing Powei' of Attorney and the Resolutions of the Board of Directors of March I, 1993 have not been revoked and are now in full force and effect. Signed and scaled this 3RD day of MAY , 19 °j5 NIII_~qP 14 CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT AND FINAL RE. EASE PROJECT NO. PitV93;lO TRAFRC $1eNAL AND SAFETY UG!f'!7NG INSTAiZA 770N. MARIA ~ AND A This is to certify that MACADEE ELECZ'RI CAL CONST R. · (hereinafter the "undersigned") declares to the City of Temecula, under oath, that it has paid'T'n full for all materials, supplies. labor, services, tools, equipment, and all other bills contracted for by the undersigned or by any of the undereigned's agents, employees or subconuactors used or in contribution to the execution of its contract with the City of Temecula with regard to the building, erection. construction, or repair of that certain work of improvement known as PROJECT NO. PVV93-10 TRAFRC SIGNAL AND SAFETY UGH'rING INSTALLATION. MARGARITA ROAD AND AVENIDA BARCA situated in the City of Temecula, State of California, more Particularly described as follows: TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION AT'MARGARITA & AVEN. IDA BARCA INSERT TITLE OF WORK HERE The undersigned declares that it knows of no unpaid debts or claims arising~ out of said Contract which would constitute grounds for any third party to claim a stop notice of any unpaid sums owing to the undersigned. Further, for valuable cortsidermtion. the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the undersigned does hereby fully release and acquit the City of Temecula and all agents end employees of the City, and each of them. from any and all claims, debts, demands, or causes of action which exist or might exist in favor of the undersigned by reason of the Contract executed between the undersigned and the City of Temecula or which relate in any way to the work performed by the undersigned with regard to the above-referenced construction project. Further, the undersigned expressly acknowledges its awareness of, and waives the benefits of, Section 1542 of the Civil Code of the State of California which provides: 'A gen&ral release does not extend to claims which the creditor does not know or suspect to exist in his favor at the time of executing the release, which if known by him must have materially affected his settlement with the debtor.' This release is intended to be a full and general release of any and all claims whichthe undersigned now has or may., in the future, have against the City of Temecula and/or it~ agents and ernl~loyees with regard to any matter arising from the construction of the above-referenced project or the Contract between the City of Temecula and the Contractor with respect thereto, whether such claims are now known or unknown or 8re suspected or unsuspected. Dated: MAY i0, 1995 ' RELEASE RECEIVED CONTRACTOR By. SDEBRA A. MCCARTHY VICE PRESI~N~T Print Name and Title MAY 12 1995 CITY OF TEMECULA n-~ r:tmiP%Projects~PwS3-10~bidpkgt eke ITEM 10 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAl ~ CITY ATTORNEY I I FINANCE OFFICE CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer June 13, 1995 Release Faithful Performance and Labor and Material bonds for Street Improvements, and the Monument Bond in Parcel Map No. 23426, PREPARED BY: Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council AUTHORIZE the release of the Faithful Performance and Labor and Material Bond for Street Improvements and the Subdivision Monumentation bond in Parcel Map No. 23426 and DIRECT the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Surety. BACKGROUND: On March 6, 1990, the City Council approved Final Map No. 23426. Agreements and Faithful Performance and Material and Labor Bonds were filed by: Nicholas E. Tavaglione 3545 Central Ave., Ste. 200 Riverside, CA 92506 for the installation of' street improvements, sewer system, and subdivision monumentation. Accompanying the subdivision agreements were bonds posted by Amwest Surety Insurance Company as follows: Bond No. 1203075 in the amount of $109,000 to cover street improvements. Bond No. 1203076 in the amount of $7,500 to cover sewer system improvements. Bonds No. 1203078 and 1203079, in the amounts of $54,500 and $3,750, respectively, to cover material and labor amounts for street and sewer system improvements. Bond No. 1203077 in the amount of $5,100 to cover subdivision monumentstion. -1- R:~.d~t~kO613~23426/ejp The following items have been completed under CFD 88-12 auspices in accordance with the approved plans: Required street improvements within Parcel Map No. 23426. Inasmuch as CFD 88-12 completed the work initially covered by the 'Agreement for the Construction of Road/Drainage Improvements" in Parcel Map No. 23426, and that payment for this work shall be by the developer and/or any successors-in-interest through CFD 88-12 processes, it is recommended that the Faithful Performance and Labor and Material bonds for the street improvements be released: -' Street Improvements: Faithful Performance: Bond No. 1203075 .. $109,000 Labor end Material: Bond No. 1203078 54,500 Public Works Staff is working with the Developer end the Eastern Municipal Water District regarding the contractual sewer system improvements to clarify responsibilities in this area of improvements. Survey Monumentation for this map has been inspected and approved. Public Works Staff therefore recommends release of this security. That Portion of Ynez Road fronting this development was included in the Riverside County Maintained-Road System prior to incorporation and accepted into the City system by and at incorporation. FISCAL IMPACT: None Attachment: Location Map -2- R:~'pt~95M)613'~3426/ajp Vll IHITY MAP NO ,~CALE PARCEL MAP NO. 23426 Location Map ITEM 11 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer June 13, 1995 SUBJECT: Professional Consultant Selection Policy PREPARED BY: f~ Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects Debbie Powell, CIP Analyst RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approves the Policy for Professional Consultant Selection. BACKGROUND: Most Capital Projects undertaken by the City of Temecula require professional consultact services. These consultants perform a variety of services including Civil Engineering, Environmental/Geological testing, Land Surveying, Materials Testing, Inspection Services, etc. The Public Works Department of the City of Temecula has developed · policy for Professional Consultant Selection. This policy establishes a process for the selection and ranking of qualified firms to perform services for the City. The procedure outlined in this policy will ensure the procurement of quality consulting services for the City. The Policy for Professional Consultant Selection has been reviewed by local consultants and the Coordination Committee to ensure completeness. Once approved by the City Council, this policy will become part of the Public Works Department Procedures Manual. FISCAL IMPACT: None Attachments: 1. Policy for Professional Consultant Selection CITYOFTI~iECULA PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT SFt--PCTION The purpose of this Policy is to provide a process for the selection and ranking of qualified firms to perform services for projects which are anticipated to require professional consultant services. PROCEDUI~R I. ESTAm-ISH~-~ OF CONSUt-TANT LISTS Consultaat's list for professional services will be developed on the basis of the qualification standards specified herein. A maximum of ~ qualified firms will be sssigaed to each list, and there will be one list per c~egory of professional services required. Services shall be categorized according to type of professional services. The types of categories include, but are not limited to: 1. Civil Engineering (i.e., Roads; Bridges; Hydrology; Hydraulics; Structural; Construction Management) 2. RnvironmentallGeolo~ical (i.e., Soils; Water Testing) 3. l~nd Surveying (i.e., Boundary/Survey Studies; Mapping; Legal Descriptions; Construction Staking) . 4. Landscape Architecture (i.e., Conceptual Studies; Design; Construction Management) 5. Materials Testing (i.e., Laboratory Tests; Field Inspeaions) 6. Traffic Engineering (i.e., Planning; Operations; Design) 7. Inspection Services (Civil) Each of the above types of professional services will be sub-categorized according to total professional services fees, as follows: 1. Under $25,000 2. $25,000 to $75,000 3. Over $75,000 H. NOTICING OF PROTECTS The City shall prepare a list of projects in the Capital Improvements Program (CIP) which are anticipated to require professional consultant services. B. The projects list as described in the CIP can be obtained at City Hall. m. STATEM~.NT OF OUAI-IFICATIONS Firms which wish to be considered for pwfessional services related to projea list shall submit the following information (Exh~it A): 1. Firm name and year established. 2. Business address and telephone number. 3. Firm principals. 4. Qualifications of key personnel likely to be assigned to the work throughout the project, including names, professional registrations, responsibilities, and examples of similar work; include resumes. 5. Experience of key personnel likely to be assigned to the work. 6. Types of services typically performed. 7. Largest project completed within last three yeats. 8. Projects compl~_~_ by fitm for City of Teme~a within the past twelve (12) months. 9. The capacity in which sub-consultants would be used for the project(s). 10. List of similar projects. 11. Specific project(s) for which firm wishes to be considered. 12. List of references and previous clients. 13. Current numb= of projects and estimated con-qtruetion costs. Firm shall indicate type of professional services performed Cm accordance with total eon--ttuction casts), on Exhibit B. C. Firm shall complete m~l submit Government Form SF254. EVAI-UATION CRITRRIA A. Statement~ of Qualifications (Statements) shall first be evaluated Incomplete Statements shall be disqualified from consideration. for completeness. B. Statements shah be evaluated on the basis of the criteria specified in Exhibit C: QUALIFICATIONS OF FIRM AND ASSOCIATES: a. Qualifications of key personnel likely to be assigned to the work throughout the project. (10 Points Possible) b. Qualificatiom of other personnel likely to be assigned to the work. (10 Points Possible) c. Types of services which the firm is qualified to perform. (10 Points Possible) ABILITY TO PROVIDE SERVICES: a. Services typically performed. (15 Points Possible) b. Previous satisfactory performance of work for the City. (10 Points Possible) c. Use of sub-consultants. (0-5 Points Possible) PERFORMANCE OF SIMILAR WORK: a. Project experience of consultant team in performing Similar projectS. (15 Points Possible) b. Nature, quality and relevance of recently completed projects. (5 Points Possible) c. Nature, quality and relevance of similar completed projects. (5 Points Possible) LOCATION OF FIRM: a. City of Temecula (staffed full time) (10 Points Possible) b. Riverside County (5 Points Possible) c. Other (0 points) V. RANKING OF CONSlit .TA NTS A. Firms will be ranked on the basis of total possible points. Eligibility lists will be established by the type of services the finn has been pre-qualified to perform, wRhin a specified dollar category. VI. DISTRmUTION OF WORK h is the City's desire to distribute consultant work as equitably as possible to a large pool of qualified firms. Comequently, firms which have participated in recent large consultant contracts will likely not be considered for the nest large contract. The following criteria shall assist in achieving this goal: Tan (10) Points: Firm has not participated in any City projects over $50,000, including all change orders, within the past twelve months. Five (5') Points: Firm has participated in City projects between $2S,000 and $50,000, including all change orders, within the past twelve months. No Points: Firm has participated in any City projects over $25,000 within the past twelve months. VII. SELECTION OF CONSULTANTS The primary consideration whan retaining consultant services shall be qualifications of consultant, and the quality of the services previously provided to the City of Temecula and other cities as related by references listed for pwjects in other cities. Firms will be contacted in order of ranking as modified by the distribution point within the category of the professional services to be required by City. The City's Projea Manager shall provide the following information for the consideration of the firm: 1. Services required. 2. Estimated duration of the project. 3. Approximate date work is to begin. Upon review of the above, firm may elect to decline consideration for the project or confirm interest in performing the services. Should the firm elect to be eliminated from consideration, the City will contact the next ranked firm. The firm removed .from consideration may be considered for the next projea. Upon written confirmation of the firm's interest in providing services, Project Manager will begin contract negotiations. NEGOTIATION OF CONTRACT A. For the purposes of negotiation, the firm shall prepare a scope of work. The scope of work shall include identification of the services to be provided, a proposed work plan by task, a schedule by man hours, and fees for services. In the event that agreement on the scope of work or the mount of fee c~nnot be reached with the negotiating firm, all negotiations shall be terminated and the Project Manager shall undertake negotiations with the second most qualified finn, in accordance with the consultant rankings. STA~ OF QUALIFICATIONS EX H I 8]'r nan FIRM NAME ADDRESS YEAR ESTABLISH PHONE NO. NAME NAME NAME QU, P, LWICATIONS FIRM PRINCIPALS: (Indicate name and rifle of primary officers of the firm.) TITLE TITLE TrI~-~ OF KEY PERSONNEL: (Indicate professional specialized experience of personnel which will be assigned to project(s).) registrations and PROIECT EXPERIENCE OF KEY PERSONNEL: (Indicate the specific project experience of each of the personnel proposed for the project(s).) I~ROFESSIONAL SERVICES TYPICALLY PERFORMI~D: (Indicate the professional services which firm is qualified to perform and typically performs.) types of THREE LARGEST I'ROJECTS COMIPx,ETED WII'H i~T LAST THREE YEARS: (Indicate largest project in terms of total consultant fees) LIST AIJJ PROJECTS CO1V[PLETED BY FIRM FOR CITY OF TElVlECUIA WITHIN THE PAST TWELVE MONTHS: (Indicates all pwjects undertaken by firm as either primary and sub-consultant.) .. CAPACITY IN WHICH SUB-CONSULTANTS WOULI} BE USED: (Indicate how the firm proposes to utilize sub-consultants.) t-~T PROJECTS WHICH ARE SIMILAR TO THOSE FOR WHICH FIRM WISHES TO BE CONSIDer: (Indicate projects which have been completed by the firm and are similar to those proposed by the City.) PROJECTS FOR WHmCli FIRM WlSlt~ TO BE CONSIDERED: (Specify project(s)'from list of proposed City projects.) LIST REFEREI~ICES AND/OR PREVIOUS CLW~NTS: (Indicate name and organization.) NAME ORGANIZATION NAME ORGANIZATION NAME ORGANIZATION NAME ORGANIZATION PHONE NO. PROJECT PHONE NO. PROJECT PHONE NO. PROJF, ET PHONE NO. PROJECT CITY OF TEMECULA PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SURVEY P~m~edw.ktheb~xwhi~hpert~inst~thetype~fpr~f~i~n~service~pr~.-~vi~j~-~byf~m~ba~ed~nthet~t~e~nmuaime~t of the project. CIVIL ENGINEERING: Biological and Soils Analysis/Investigations W~Analys~s~Testing LAND SURVEYING: Boundary/Constr~tion Staking Mapping Legal Descriptions/RW Analysis LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE: Conc~'ptual Studies Land/Irrigation Design Construction Management MATERIALS TESTING: Laboratory Tests Field Inspections TRAFFIC ENGINEERING: Planning D~siSn INSPECTION SERVICES Structural Civil Building CITYOF~ CONSULTANT RATING FORM 1. QUALIFICATIONS OF FIRM AND ASSOCIATES: a. Qualifications of key personnel likely to be assigned to the work. b. Qualifications of other personnel likely to be assigned to the work. c. Types of services which the firm is qualified to perform. 2. ABHATY TO PROVIDE SERVICES: a. Services typically performed. b. Provions satisfactory performance of work for City. c. Use of sub-consultants. 3. PERFORMANCE OF SIMILAR WORK: a. Project experience of consultant team in performing similar projects. b. Nature, quality and relevance of recently completed projects. c. Nature, quality and relevance of similar completed projects. 10 10 10 10 15 5 5 4. LOCATION OF FIRM: a. City of Temecula b. Riverside County Other 10 5 0 TOTAL 100 RATED BY: Name Title ITEM 12 APPROVAl CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF TEMECULA AOENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer June 13, 1995 SUBJECT: Tract Map No. 27827 (located north of Nicolas Road and east of Winchester Road) ~ PREPARED BY: ~ Jim D. Faul, Assistant Engineer - Land Development RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve Final Tract Map No. 27827 subject to the Conditions of Approval. BACKGROUND: Tentative Tract Map No. 27827 was submitted to the City of Temecula Planning Department on July 9, 1993. The Tentative Tract Map was approved by the City Council on January 25, 1994. The phasing application was subsequently approved by the Planning Director on March 28, 1994. The Developer has met ell of the applicable Conditions of Approval. Final Tract Map No. 27827 contains 44 residential lots and within 5.37 gross acres. The tract is located north of Nicolas Road and east of Winchester Road. This tract is part of the Roripaugh Estates Specific Plan (County. approved Specific Plan No. 164), Amendment No. 2 as approved by the City Council on January 25, 1994, and County of Riverside Development Agreement No. 37. An Amendment and Restatement of Development Agreement with the City of Temecula was approved on October 11, 1994. The Developer is Coscan/Davidson Homes. The following fees and deposits have been paid for Final Tract Map No. 27827: Stephen's K-Rat Fee (paid for entire tract) Flood Control Fee, ADP (paid for entire tract) Deposit for raised landscaped median on Nicolas Road (along entire tract frontage) 44,680.00 26,527.50 16,544.16 -1 - r:%egdrpt%gb'M)613%tr27827~eep The following fees have been deferred for Final Tract Map No. 27827: Public Facilities Fee Due prior to Building Permit Signal Mitigation Fee Due prior to Building Permit Fire Mitigation Fee Due prior to Building Permit The park land dedication requirement (Quimby) for this tract will be satisfied with the dedication of a three (3) acre improved park site to the City prior to the issuance of the 34th certificate of occupancy for the entire project. Condition No. 77 of the Conditions of Approval states that a declaration of Covenants, Conditions end Restrictions (CC & R's) shall be recorded prior to, or concurrently with the final map recordation for the affected lots. The developer has stated that their construction phasing differs from their final map phasing and thus presents a problem in providing recorded CC & R's for the entire Tract Map No. 27827. Staff agreed to place a "hold" on any building permits for the lots within Tract Map No. 27827 until they are annexed into the project CC & R's by a recorded document. The following bonds have been posted for Final Tract Map No. 27827: Faithful Labor & Subdivision Performance Material Monument Street and Drainage Water Sewer Warranty Bond Survey Monuments Parkway Landscaping $220,000 $220,000 $67,000 $67,000 $53,500 $53,500 $34,050 30,134 15,067 3,393 FISCAL IMPACT: None. ATTACHMENTS: 2. 3. 4. Development Fee Checklist Vicinity Map Copy of Sheet 2, Tract Map 27827 Fees and Securities Report -2- r:~agdrpt%gS%0613%tr27827.map CITY OF TEMECULA DEVELOPMENT FEE CHECKLIST Final Vestjr-, Tract Men No. 278~7 The following fees and deposits were reviewed by Staff relative to their applicability to this project. F66 Habitat Conservation Plan (K-Rat) Parks and Recreation (Quimby Fees) Traffic Signal' Mitigation Public Facility Fire Protection Mitigation Flood Control (ADP) Raised Landscaped Median on Nicolas Road Condition of Aooroval Condition. No. 10 Due Prior to Grading Permit ** Condition No. 93 Condition No. 75 Due Prior to Building Permit Condition No. 80 Due Prior to Building Permit Condition No. 100 Letter dated 8/3/93 Condition No. 38 Due Prior to Grading Permit Condition No. 59 -3- r:.~agdrpt~95',O613%tr27827.mep 0t-' ~Z~, ~_ clvoU Ug, LS OZ~ = t- ,. x"" CITY OF TEMECULA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT TRACT MAP NO. 27827 ' IMPROVEMENTS ..... FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE SECURITY Street and Drainage ~ 220,000 Water 67,000 Sewer 53,500 TOTAL $ 340,500 DATE: June 13, 1995 MATERIAL & LABOR SECURITY 220,000 67,000 53,500 $ 340,500 Maintenance Retention $ 34,050 Monument Security $13,393 DEVELOPMENT FEES City Traffic Signing and Striping Costs RCFCD Drainage Fee - paid Fire Mitigation Fee - deferred Signal Mitigation Fee - deferred Deposit for raised landscaped median on Nicolas Road (along entire tract frontage) Road and Bridge Benefit Fee Other Development Fees N/A 26,527.50 T.B.D.* T.B.D.* 16,544.16 $ N/A $ T.B.D* SERVICE FEES Planning Fee Comprehensive Transportation Plan Plan Check Fee Inspection Fee Monument Inspection Fee Letter of Map Revision (LOMAR Review) Fees Paid to Date Balance of Fees Due *T.B.D. - Te be deteembed $ 145.00 $ 8.00 $ 1,630.00 $ N/A $ 675.00 $ N/A $ 2,458.00 $ 0.00 -4- r:.%agdrpt%95M)613~tr27827.fnep ITEM 13 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer : June 13, 1995 Contract Amendment No. 2 to the Professional Services Contract for Civil Engineering - Parkview Site Grading and Improvements, Project No. PW93-09 PREPARED BY:(~ Jim D. Faul, Assistant Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve Contract Amendment No. 2 to provide additional civil engineering services for the Parkview Site Grading Project by NBS/Lowry in the amount of $1,220.00. BACKGROUND: On August 9, 1994, the City Council of the City of Temecula awarded a contract for civil engineering services for Parkview Site Grading & Improvements, Project No. PW93-09, to NBS\Lowry, $19,945.00 with a $1,994.50 contingency amount. Amendment No. I was approved by Ron Bradley, City Manager, for $1,960.00. These additional civil engineering services are required to reduce the project export quantities. FISCAL IMPACT: The funding for these additional civil engineering services is available in Capital Improvements Fund Number 210-199-128-5802. The total cost of the project is summarized below. A. Original Contract (approved 8-9-94) $19,945.00 B. Amendment No. 1 (approved April 1995) $1,960.00 C. Proposed Amendment No. 2 $1 ..~0.00 Total = $23,125.00 Attachments: Contract Amendment No. 2 r:.lagdq~t~gS%0613~.wkview.O02 A.MEND~ NO. 2 NBS LOWRY CONTRACT ORDER NO. 16070 The Agreement dated August 9, 1994, between the City of Temec-ln, and NBS/Lowry (herein referred to as "Agreement") is hereby amended as follows: Professional Design Services for Parkview Grading Improvements Section 1 ' The Scope of Work is hereby amended by adding the following activities: Scope of Services The Scope of Work shall be amended to include the following ADDITIONAL services as described in the ached letters from NBS~w~ dated 5-23-95: Design a raised pad area, seven to eight feet high, north of the athletic field. Design a fill area westerly of the athletic field in the vicinity of the debris basin. TOTAL AMOUNT $1,220.00 Section 2 Compensation shah be for all services described in this Amendment and shall not exceed One Thousand Two Hundred Twenty Dollars ($1,220.00). A. Approved Contract $ 19,945 B. Amendment No. 1 (Approved April 1995) 1,960 C. Proposed Amendment No. 2 1.220 Total: $ 23.125 Section 3 All other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain the same. The parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the Date and year above written. CTrYOF~ k,, OWRY R91-431 4.01 6 May23. 1995 Mr. Jim D. Faul, P.E Assistant Engineer CITY OF TEMECULA 43174 Business Park Drive Tema,,ula, CA 82590 RE: ADDITIONAL SERVICE8 FOR PAR KVIEW 81TE ROUGH GRADING PLAN, PW93-O9 Dear Jim: Per your reque~ I l~ave prepared the following fee estimate to provide engineering design eervlou whlolq will include revision of the rough grading plan north of the athletlo ~ield. It b antidpated that this are can be rajeed approximately seven to eight feet without siftsang the fill slopes H they are ourrently designed. We estimate that the work effort to complete the above task will be as follows: Principal Engineer: 1.0 hr~ (~> $100.00 - $100.00 Senior Designart 1.0 hm ~ $ 88.00 = $ e~.oo Senior Drafter:. 2.0 hr~ (1) $ 55.00 - $110.00 TOTAL: $295.00 Please sign one copy and return to us as authorization to prooeed with the additional services. - KBVIN IC EU. IOTT, P.E. Principal Engineer /ab JIM D, FAUL, P,E- A~eistant Engineer IIB ST " Rg1-O14.01e May ;8, 1996 Mr. Jim D. Faul, P.E. Assistant Engineer CITY OF TEMEGULA 40174 BusinNs Perk Drive Temeeule, CA 928e0 RE: ADDITIONAL, 8PRVIC~ES FOR PARKVIEW 81TE ROUGH GRADING PLAN, PW93.,09 Dear Jim: RECEtVED-- MAY 3 1995 CffY OF TEMEC,~_~ ~-"l ENG~HEERtNG DEPA Per your request, I have prepared the following fee estimate t~ provide engineering deign 8evieee which will include revision of the rough grading plan westerly of the field me= in the vicinity of the debHe basin, It is anUdpmed that this area can be ~lecl a maximum of approximately twenty ~te feet without Increasing the overall length of the exterior fill elope eignili;antly. Racing fill in this area will require the following Ireroe to be re-deigned end/or re-Qal=uleted:; 2. 3. 4. Terrace drmns, downdrains end rip-rap ener~/dinSpeter. CMP RIser, concrete apron, storm drain end rip-rap energy diaeipetor. Exterior drainage rowale (top. of slope) and fdl elopes, Concrated dp.,rapenergy dissips:tot (debris basin dam). 5. Earthwork quantities. We estimate that the worn effort to ~omplete the above t~ekm will be u foliowe: Principal Engineer: Senior Designer: Senior Draftor: 2.0 hm (~ $100.00' - $200.00 4.0 hrs ~ $ 85.00 - S3,;0.00 7.0 nrs t $ 85.00 - $385.0o TOTAL: $925.00 Please sign one copy and return to us u =uthorization to proceed with the additional services. KEVIN K. ELL!OTT, P.E. Principal Engineer tab JIM D. FAUL, P.E. Assistant Engineer ITEM 14 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Council/City Manager ,~-~'Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works\City Engineer June 13, 1995 Solicitation of Construction Bids for Walcott Corridor Project - PW94-10 PREPARED BY: f~ Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects Scott Harvey, Associate Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the plans and specifications and authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit public construction bids for Walcott Corridor - Project PW94-10. BACKGROUND: The plans, specifications and contract documents have been completed and the project is ready to be advertised for construction bids. The Walcott Corridor will provide an all weather surface road from Nicolas Road to La Serena Way by way of Calle Girasol, Calle Chapos, and Walcott Road. This project will provide for two (2) travel lanes (total of 28' of pavement width) within a 66' wide dedicated right-of-way. The alinement will follow the existing right- of-way and accommodate a 30-mph design seed. The total length of the project is approximately 8,500 feet. This project will raise and lower the existing grades of all the streets throughout the project. The proposed new grades will require Rancho California Water District to relocate their existing water main in Walcott Lane and Calle Chapos. The cost for the relocation will be reimbursed to the City by R.C.W.D. The engineer's estimate for the street improvements and water main relocation is $1,583,000 and $837,000, respectively. This brings the total project cost to $2,420,000. FISCAL IMPACT: This project is a Capital Improvement Project which will be funded by Measure A and Development Impact Fees. The water main improvements will be paid for by R.C.W.D. pwO4~qdtpt~S~O613~d~J-lO.bid ITEM 15 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: I APPROVAL CITY AI'rORNEY~. RNANCE OR=ICE CITY MANAGER . CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning~'' June 13, 1995 Planning Application No. 95-0003- Westside Specific Plan, Planning Application No. 95-0004- Tentative Tract Map No. 28011, Planning Application No. 94- 0061 - Master Conditional Use Permit, Planning Application No. 95-0031 - Environmental Impact Report and Development Agreement No. DV95-0001 Prepared By: David Hogan, Associate Planner Matthew Fagan, Assistant Planner RECOMMENDATIONS: The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council: 1. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 95- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA CERTIFYING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 95-0031 (FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT) ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENTS OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATION AND APPROVING THE MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM ON PROPEITTY GENERALLY LOCATED WEST OF INTERSTATE 15, EAST OF THE CrTY'S WESTERN BORDER, SOUTH OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AND NORTH OF THE SANTA MARGARITA RIVER 2. Adopt · resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 95- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 95-0003 {WESTSIDE SPECIFIC PLAN) AND CHANGING THE ZONE FROM R-A-20 (RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL - TWENTY ACRE MINIMUM PARCEL SIZE) TO S-P (SPECIRC PLAN) ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED WEST OF PUJOL STREET, EAST OF THE CITY'S WESTBtN BORDER SOUTH OF RIDGE PARK DRNE, AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBE!tS 940-310-013, 940-320-001, 940-320-002,940-320-003,940-320-004, 940-320-005,940-320-006 AND 940-320-007 R:~ORMS%STAFFRFT,CC 6/7/95 Idb 1 3. Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 95- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CRY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE OFRCIAL ZONING MAP OF SAID CITY IN THE CHANGE OF ZONE APPLICATION CONTAINED IN PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 95.0003, CHANGING THE ZONE PROM R-A-20 (RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL - TWENTY ACRE MINIMUM PARCEL SIZE) TO S-P (SPECIRC PLAN) ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED WEST OF PUJOL STREET, EAST OF THE CITY'S WESTERN BORDER SOUTH OF RIDGE PARK DRIVE, AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 940-310.013, 940-320.001, 940-320-002, 940-320-O03,940-320-004, 940-320.005,940-320-O06 AND 940-320.007 4, Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 95- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 94-0061 (MASTER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) TO PERMIT CABARET THEATERS (2), SALOONS (2), AN OPERA HOUSE, TV/RADIO STATION, VIRTUAL REALITY THEATERS (2), A QUICK DRAW AREA, ADMINISTRATIVE AND TICKET OFFICES IN AN AREA GENERALLY BOUNDED BY SIXTH STREET TO THE NORTH, FIRST STREET TO THE SOUTH, MURRIETA CREEK TO THE WEST AND INTERSTATE 15 TO THE EAST 5. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 95- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 95.0004{TENTATIVETRACT MAP NO. 28011)TO SUBDIVIDE 154.1 'ACRES INTO BGHT (8) PARCELS ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED WEST OF PIJJOL STREET, EAST OF THE CITY'S WESTERN BORDER SOUTH OF RIDGE PARK DRIVE, AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 540-310.013,540-320.001,940-320.002, 940-320.003, 940-320.004, 940-320.005, 540-320.006 AND 540-320.007 6. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 95- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. DV95.0001 FOR PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 95.0003 (WESTSIDE SPECIFIC PLAN) R:%FORMS'vSTAFFFFT.CC 6/7/95 Idb 2 BACKGROUND The Old Town Redevelopment Project ("Project") was first 'considered by the Planning Commission on May 15, 1995. At that time, the Commission took public testimony and closed the public hearing. After Commission discussion, they directed Staff to provide additional information on the project and continued the Project to the June 5, 1995 meeting. Most of the questions concerned the timing of the public and private improvements, the characteristics of the proposed land uses in the Westside Specific Plan, and additional clarification on the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and the Mitigation Monitoring Program. The May 15, 1995 Staff Report is included in Attachment No. 7. The June 5, 1995 Staff Report contains the Commission's questions and staff's responses to the issues raised at the May 15, 1995 Planning Commission meeting. The June 5, 1995 Staff Report is included in Attachment No. 8. At the June 5, 1995 Commission meeting, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council Certify the Environmental Impact Report (Planning Application 95-0031 )on a 4-1 vote. Commissioner Blair voted against this recommendation because of her concern that the Air Quality Management District's standard impact methodology and the traffic studies did not adequately describe the impacts of the Project on the environment and local street system. The Planning Commission also recommended approval of the Westside Specific Plan (Planning Application No. 95-0003), Tentative Tract Map No. 28011 (Planning Application No. 95- 0004), Master Conditional Use Permit (Planning Application No. 94-0061 ), and Development Agreement No. DV95-0001 to the City Council by a 5-0 vote. As a result of the Commission's discussion, they are recommending a number of changes to conditions of approval and the Westside Specific Plan. These additional changes are discussed in the following section of this Agenda Report. DISCUSSION Timing of Improvements The Commission was concerned that the public improvements might not be completed in time to open the entertainment facilities to the public. After a lengthy discussion, the Commission decided to retain the requirements that all public improvements be complete and in place prior to Project occupancy. The Commission also stressed that City Staff and project proponents work with Riverside County and CALTRANS to coordinate completion of the ultimate interchange improvements (rather than interim improvements) at the State Route 79 south and Interstate 15 interchange. Based upon the traffic analysis and Commission discussion, it was felt that this Project component is a critical component of the public infrastructure required for the Project. The requirement that all the needed infrastructure be completed prior to occupancy has been included as a condition of approval for this project. Traffic Mitigation Measure from BR The Commission felt that some of the mitigation measures for the project are needed to help alleviate existing traffic problems and should be implemented as soon as possible. These include the re-striping of Rancho California Road at Interstate 15 and the synchronization of the traffic signal at Diaz Road and Rancho California Road. These additional measures have been added to the conditions of approval. R:%FO~AFFRPT.CC e,'7/~6 klb 3 Delel~on of Planning Area D of the Westside Specific Plan The Commission was also concerned with the High Density Residential development proposed in Planning Area D (as shown in Figure 3) of the Westside Specific Plan. Planning Area D is located in the southwestern portion of the project s'~e, west of the proposed Western Bypass Road. The Commission felt that any development in this area would result in excessive grading and scarring of the hillside and would allow incompatible development adjacent to the open space areas. The Commission is recommending that the Council delete Planning Area D from the Specific Plan and merge this area into the open space area (Planning Area F). This deletion will also affect Planning Application No. 95-0004 {Tentative Tract Map No. 28011) by reducing the number of parcels from nine to eight. None of these changes are reflected in the exhibits or text of the Westside Specific Plan. Wild West Arena The Commission was also concerned with the colors and ma.terials for the proposed" arena/tent. The Commission recommended that the reference to the striped tent be deleted from the Specific Plan and that the color of the tent be designed to somewhat blend with the background colors. The applicant concurred with this change. In addition, the Commission had concerns with the height of the proposed arena. The architect for the project stated that they were aware of this concern and will work to reduce the height of the arena. The Commission felt that the colors and design of the arena could be successfully addressed when the actual development plans for the arena are submitted. -' Grading Plan Staff received a preliminary grading plan for the Westside Specific Plan on June 2, 1995. Based upon the preliminary grading plan, staff and the Commission had a number of concerns with the proposed grading. The proposed grading plan was very conceptual and appeared to facilitate development that the Planning Commission did not support. As 8 result, 8 condition of approval was added which requires the applicant to submit a detailed Grading Plan to the Planning Commission for its review and approval prior to the Second Reading of the Ordinance amending the Official Zoning Map of the City. Westem Bypass Corridor Assessment District The Planning Commission also discussed the scope and scale of the proposed assessment district. The Commission felt that the private entertainment facilities in the core of Old Town should also be required to participate in the District. As a result, the Commission is recommending that the Old Town Core Entertainment venues either be included in the proposed assessment district or that other comparable financial arrangements be included in the Disposition and Development Agreement. Consistency with the Old Town Specific Plan The Old Town Specific Plan established land use and development standards and design guidelines to regulate the use and construction of buildings in Old Town. The Overall Goal of the Specific Plan is to create a dynamic Old Town commercial and residential core that is attractive and of high quality, respectful of its historic building and unifying design theme and providing ,an economically viable setting for a mixture of local and tourist commercial uses, R:%I=ORMS%STAFFRPT,CC 6/7/95 Idb 4 administrative/professional and residential uses with safe, efficient circulation and access. The proposed Project is clearly consistent with this Goal. The Project is expected to provide a needed redevelopment catalyst to encourage revitalization of Old Town. In addition, all of the proposed Project facilities will have to be consistent with the land use requirements and design guidelines contained in the adopted Plan. RSCAL IMPACT The financial benefits of this Project to the community have been described in the Economic and Feasibility Studies prepared by Price-Waterhouse. However, the specific financing plan has not yet been finalized. As a result, no additional information is available. .- Attachments: 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Resolution No. 95- Final Environmental Impact Report (Planning Application No. 95- 0031), Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding ConSideration and Mitigation Monitoring Program - Page 6 Resolution No. 95- Westside Specific Plan (PI. anning Application No. 95-0003)and Change of Zone and Conditions of Approval - Page 11 Ordinance No. 95- Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Temecula Amending the Official Zoning Map - Page 30 Resolution No. 95- Master Conditional Use Permit (Planning Application No. 94- 0061 ) and Conditions of Approval - Page 33 Resolution No. 95- Tentative Tract Map No. 28011 (Planning Application No. 95- 0004) and Conditions of Approval - Page 50 Resolution No. 95- Development Agreement No. DV95-0001 - Page 74 Planning Commission Staff Report (May 15, 1995)- Page 80 Planning Commission Memorandum and Supplemental Memorandum (June 5, 1995)- Page 81 Planning Commission Minutes (May 15, 1995)- Page 82 Planning Commission Minutes (June 5, 1995) - Page 83 Chapter 9 of Final EIR - Response to Comments - Page 84 Exhibits - Page 85 R:\FORMS~"TAFFRPT.CC 6/7/96 klb 5 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 RESOLUTION NO. 95- FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT, FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENTS OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATION AND MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM R:',tFORIV!S'~STAFFRPT.CC 6/7/96 Idb 6 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 RESO~ON NO. 9~- A ~LUTION OF ~ CITY COUNCIL OF Tm?~ CITY OF TE~IECULA CERTIFYING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 9~-0031 (FINAL ENVIRO~AL IMPACT l~EPORT) ADOPTING F/NDINGS' OFFACT AND STATEMENTS OF OVERR1DING CONSIDERATION AND APPROVING ~ MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM ON PROPERTY GENEI~I,I,Y LOCATED WEST OF INTERSTATE 1S, EAST OF ~ CITY'S WESTERN BORDER, SOUTH OF RANClIO C~,Lr~ORNIA ROAD AND NORTH OF ~ :SANTA MARGARITA WInm!~AS, Tom Dodson and Associates completed Planning Application No. 95-0031 State CEQA Cmide-lin~; WHKUE~kq, said ~ application was processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local hw; :. W~ERI~-%S, the plnnning Commi.~ion considered said Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) which includes the Draft n~p,, the Technical Appendices, the Response to Comments, the Mitigation Monitoring Program, Findings of Fact and Statements of Overridilig Considerations on May 15, 1995, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition; WH ERE~S, the plnnnlng Commi.~sion continued this item at their May 5, 1995 meeting to June 5, 1995; W~ERI~.~iS, the Planl~ Commi.~sion considered said Filial Environmental Impact Pepon (FE[R) which includes the Draft EXR, the Technical Appendices, the Response to Comments, the ]Viitigation Monitoring Program, Findings of Fact and Statements of Overriding Considerations on June 5, 1995; WHERE&S, at the conclusion of the Planning Commi.~sion h~ring, tile Planning Commi.~sion recommendod Cefiification of the said ~ Adopted the Findings of Fact and Statements of Overriding Con.~ideration and Approved the Mitigation Monitoring Program; NOW, THEREFORE, ~ CITY OF TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOIJOWS: Section 1. Findings. That the City of Temecutn City Council in Certifying the FEIR, makes the followlug Findings of Fact and Statements of Overriding Considerations set foxth on Exhibit A, attached hereto and lucox!oomed herein as set forth in full, to wit: R:\FORMS~'I'AFFRPT.CC era,as mb 7 Section 2. Condlticmx. That the City of Temecula City Council hereby certifies planning App~n NO. 9~-0031 (ImlR), adopts Findings of Fact and Stntemaents of OverTiding Consideration and approves the MitigMion Monitoring Program (Rxhibit B) for the Old Town BntcrUtinment Project which includes the Ms.q~er Conditional Use Permit, the Westside Specific phn, and subsequent developmeot proposals wifilhl these areas including but not limited to Development Agreement No. DV9~-0001. Section 3. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 13th day of June, 1995. l~ E. Stone, Mayor ATTEST: June S. GnU, City Clerk [SPAL] STATE OF C,~w-mORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMBCULA) I HERERy CERT~Y that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 13th day of June, 1995 by the following vote of the Council: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: CITY COUNCH1VIEMBERS: C1TY COUNCU~MEMBERS: CITY COUNCrhMEMBERS: June S. Greek, City Clerk R:\FO~AI~.CC 6/7/'85 Idb 8 EXHIBIT A FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENTS OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS R:%FORMS~,STAFFRPT.CC 6/7/96 kJb 9 CANDIDATE FACTS, FINDINGS AND STATEM~er OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS REGARDING THE ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS FROM IMIH .~-MENTING ~ OLD TOWN Bk'~EVELOPMENT PROJECT IN THE CITY OF TEMECUIA A. INTRODUC~ON The City of Temecula, in approving MIk~J Conditional User Permit (Planning Application No. 94-0061), the Westside Specific Plan (planning Application No. 95-0003), Tentative Tract Map No. 28011 (Planning Application No 95-0004) and Development Agreement No. DV95-0001) (the *proposed project'), which will allow the City of Temecula and The Zev Buffman Group to develop entertainment facilities, a hotel, commercial and residential uses, makes the findings of fact described below and adopts the statement of overriding comidemtiom presented at the end of this document. Hereafter, the following documents (Initial Study, Notice of Preparation, Draft EIR, Technical Appendices, Rm--ponse to Comments and Appendices) will be referred to collectively as 'the EIR* for the proposed project. B. PROJ~-CT SUMMARY B.1 PROJECT LOCATION The proposed project encompasses two development .areas, Old Town Temecuh and the Westside Specific Plan area. The Old Town Specific Plan area in Old Town Temecula consists of the area between Rancho California Road and Santiago Road/l:irst Street on the north and south, respectively, and the 1-15 F~eeway on the east, and essentially, Pujol Street on the West. The Westside Specific Plan area encompasses appwxirnately 153.1 acres south and west of Pujol Street in the City of Temecula. The mapped location of the proposed project areas can be found on the Murrieta and Temecuh 7.5' topographic maps published by the U.S. Geological Survey, at Latitude 33° 28' North and Longitude 1170 09' West. B.2 PROJECT CHARACTERISTICS The proposed project envisions the phased construction of twelve en~rminment maures, activity areas, parking areas and circulation system mndi~eations, and a hotel. Phase 1 is proposed to be completed within two years of permit issuance by the City. Phase 2 will be implemented some time after two years when demand for facilities is sufficient to justify construction. The proposed pwject also includes new land use designations over the 153.1 acre Westside Specific Plan area. Within the Westside Specific Plan area, only the Wild West Arena and hotel are forecast to be constructed during Phase 1. The remainder of the land within the Westside Specific Plan area will be developed at some undefined point in the future. An estimated total of twelve new occupiable structures are proposed for construction as part of the proposed project, and a single parking structure may be constructed in the Old Town area. The entertainment structures are designed to implement the central entertainment concept of the Old Town Specific Plan (OTSP). As previomly noted, two of the atomtares (the Wild West Arena and the hotel) are located west and south Old Town within the Westaide Specific Plan area (wsP). B.2.1 Old Tow~ Core nevel~ Proi~ The Phase I Old Town facilities and improvements are proposed m be developed within the next two years. Phase 2 facilities and improvements will be developed as needed or when economically justifiable. No specific locatiom have yet been ~nalizecl for any of the following facilities located within the OTSP area. Several alternative plans have been identified that show facilities on diffe~nt parcels within the OTSP. The proposed project consists of a c~nceptual description of the facilities and their proposed a~ivity patterm. The EIR, Chapter 3, contains the detailed descriptiom of the proposed facilities and activities. 1. C~b-retTh~a-~: Two cabatet tigatets am pmposed to be logated in .the OTSP cote area- Bothcabaret hold 13 shows per week. be wmnuctai ming P!me 1 oftlmVrojeaaud eacla saloon is pmpcsed to wnminaPPmximmlY 10,000 at tables and about 100 at or adjacent to the bat. A small stage will be provided for typical bar The saloons will operate every day ofthe week. 3. Otgra Ho,,~': An open house is proposed to be locamcl in the OTSP. It would be coasmu:md dining Phase 1 ofthe project The opem house is pmposed wbe atwo story smuma~with the Ptoseeaium approximately 50 f~et high. The opera house is expm~ to em'u..,t~',-s 85,000 fe of slmge with a footprint of al~oxiamly 75,000 t~. ~-~,,~,x.d seating mpa:ity will be 1,400 persons on the fast floor alK! 800 seats in the balcotly. Atelevision allcl taclio studio~ll oc:c:llPY aPPtoxililal~Y2,500 ft2w~hln Or 4. Showboat: AwestemslmwboatfacilitywiflaashowtomnisPmPosedtobelocamiintigOTSPcozeat~- This hcility would be impl~-.,ca~"d din'inS Plase 2 of the pmjm when adipose dmmi for addi,ioml emmalament space justifies its commgtion. The showboat will be a two-m~ muam~, with the smoimatagks appwximately 30 feet high. It is proposed to be appmximamly 21,000 fe and it 9/ould have 5. W'fidWestAr,'~' A 4,800 seat tem clesignecl wild west agaa that will be similat to Buffalo Bill's touring wes~rnt~tsh~wispwp~aedt~bel~amijustw~t~f~TSP~zea~eawithinthewestside~pedfgP~ 175,000 square f~et and the tent poles will raise the height of the fmcility to apptoximamly 85-90 feet above performed p~r day, primarily on Friday, ~rday ami Sunday. 2 is e~.,-s,~ to be about 200 penons. EachlmvHitmv/ill~::- ~rtsaboutl9,000~foratotalofb'7,000 7. -O,~i~,k, Draw' C,mme~iflon ,~res: In the Old Town co~ m · plaza or town squa~ will be comtzucted whichispiopos~locomainaquickdmw~aonatu. Ti~ ~ will be commsc~ed as pan of phaselandisl~tltoe~_~p,~alet~ualgtyS,000~ouuloouinoradjacuttotheplau. This will be a ~,~t~,..~,~d "polic~ academy" type of ~ ~aete an individml will walk through an outdoor 8. Hotel: One major hotr. l is ptoposst for conat,u~tlon in the vicinit~ Of'the wild wut alua within the WestsideSpeci~p!nn The initial conflgumion of ~ ~ is ptoptmed to be four stotiu in height and ptovideammlof350toems- it is p,~ to be conat, u~.tuiduxingPhase 1 of the ptoject. AS.Tact~ pad will be provided for this facility and it is ptopo~ to contain al~to~,imatclY 300,000 ~ of b,,adh,_o space. The hotgl my be expanded with 1~0 at!difiop'~ tooms during Phase 2 if Sd~a~ient demand justifies commercialuses. An addi6onal S0,000 i~ of nUail space may be conmucted during Phase 2 if dunand 9. l~UiiConut-,~.l: T!~CiB/~icipam~sS0,000ml00,000{fo~t~muil~~z~ick'nfi~edi" the OTSP will ul6ms~ly b~ dcvelopcci in Old Town t~ suppo~ li~ ~ rml~ilifiu/sciivitiu. IE is ~ ~ 30.000 ~f will bc ci~we. lop~l cluri~ Phu~ 1 ~ 8 compo~,,t of t. lis project. No sp~iEc 10. Visitors C~n~t/Tici~ Oflic~: OB~ O~ morn visiu~s c~m~'s/6ck~ oitic~ ~ will i~ loca~l in ~ hOUSe tCiliB7 smci oltcrs o,, ~i~ S~:OBCi flOOr Of oth~ m'uEnEu o~ withi- ~ m'ucu~s. The Phase 1 ~m~rUdsLm~nC ~d support fa~ilit. i~s ~ ~fic:ipst~l t~ b~ coEsu-uct~! ~ci op~n~! coEcurru~t. ly i~ 1996 if ai~proved by t~ CiW. I~ is also ~-~licip~ci tJ~ the ri~s~ pbss8 of the hor~l will b~ oldned L~ 1996. Pbas~ 2 f'~ilifi~s will b~ Lmpl~m~nt~ci wl~n suffici~n~ ~mand ~xis~s for ~h~m ~o b~ fuEci~ci ~ci plsced in ol~ra~ioEs. Th~ ~mr, miz~E~n~ facilifiu as~ b~isl desigs~! t~ ~ ~ ~ ~i0% ~ual uliliutjon ra~ mis~B ~o t~ c~ciliu ici~nfi~ above, wiuh oc.c~ioz~i iEdividual l~zform~c~s b~iE~ fully booke4. 3 B.2.2 Westside SBp,-tfiP P!on nevelo!F~nt Am In order for the hotel and Wild West Arena to be constructed as pan of Phase 1, the City must adopt the Westside Specific Plan and amend the General Plan. The proposed Westside Specific Plan development area encompasses approximate 153.1 acres located south and west d Pujol The following is a summary Of land uses that are. envisioned to be included in the Westside Specific Plan if it is approved by the City. 1. AxcaA: T~isarma~.`.~-`~p~47.7aa~s~mi~e~lan4esi~P~itf~rSpecis~Bve~tCc~c~aliSEc~. ~ uses. Allowable uses include wild west type ° -411,1~. shows, and suppo~ uses, iwluding a variety of public assembly activities. Hotel and supporrln_v retail activities, such as resmumms, sexyice 2. AxcaB: Aria B comprL~es 5.4 ales of land that is desiSmmi Comm,mity ~rfou~st Support (CCTS). Tne CCTS 4~gr-,io~ is desiSmi to mmt tbe nmi fa}r cmm,,,.,chl fsti~s to support ~C uses widain the Westside Specific Ptm. 3. AreaC: AxuCwmimlS. laauoflmtthatisdesiguamlHiShDeasityl~e~dem4=~(HVR)- TneHDR Accordln~_m ehe City, xhc FIDR desiF-e~on would ailow annSe of13 m20msixs persae in thc Wesside Specific Plan. Ass-m~e_~ 1~. 1 net scxes (excl-dln~ rosd ri2hxs-of-way), the m~mher of xesidcmisl units tint can be consmK3~ e~,min~ 16 unils per ac~e is 241. 4. AzeaD: AxeaD conmins l2.T acxes ofland that is desi~msxedHi~hDcnsitYResldenthl(HDR). TheHDR dcsignadons pzovide multiple f..~mily housin~ to mee~ xhe needs offunue employees of the pzoposed project. A rsn~ of 13 m 20 unixs per ac~ is allowed. ASs~nin~ 11.8 net a~es (cxcludin~ road righis-of-way), 16 residen~=l unixs per sa'e a ~ of 188 unils csn be consmsa~. 5. AxeaB: Arcs E consists of 2.8 sn~s that is desiSxated Mixed Use (MU). This use provides offace, Arca F: Axea F cEouxpasses approxi.~xely 67.4 acres of !and that is desi~q~ued Open Space (OS). This azea includes the s2~per hiu-eldes ~o the ~ of gac Wesera By-Pass which will no~ bc devclopcd. Ihc forec~s~ ~o remain undisturbed with ~e ~Jer be~u~ affect! by lhe foolpri~ of lhe Wesu~n.By-P~. With the exception of the Wild West Arena, hotel and supporting uses in the Special Event Commercial portion of the Specific Plan, the remainder of the land within the Plan is not forecast to undergo development unffi Phase 2. B.2.3 Cimd~mfion SySh, m lm]B'OV~ In order to accommodate the traffic generated by the entem~nment, food and beverage, commercial office, and hotel facilities ou~ined above, the City has identified a range of 4 circulaxion and parking system improvements u~ enhance tra~ flow within the OTSP area and the Westside Specific Plan area to the southwest, wher~ the arena and hotel will be locate. These improvemenu are outlined below. 1. Fn~Snm: inr~u_daar. ewithtlgRmdmy~andBuild-muRecommead"tlomoftbeGeneml Piau mt Old Town Specific Plan (OTSP), Smjago Romi (Fust $um) win be ,~oua~acted from at lea Front Street west and south m the Welem By-Pass Road in an 88-feet fight-of-my. This will izlude consu. m:tionofal~tidgeoverMuniemCteek- Thismad'.,,,,~oveme~wi~benm~!eddming.Phag 1 of the project in order to fa61itate tmtc flow in the OTSP and Westside Specific Plau sins. 2. Sixth Shy't: Sixfix Street may be improved in actordaze with the OTSP t~'o ......cm~.~o~. It would be ~xtg~!~i sou~b m th~ PUjol $tx~t/F'~J~ Vlld~ $gz~ inw,~C,~rm A ~ bzid~ would be ~ m 3. l~elix V,id~z Street felix Vala~ Sml will be ~xlmid from Rav. ho Califoruh Road to Pujol Sixeel4 includi~ ~'~i~t"~*~hl i!~ ,ii!~*t~ to allow ~ mllth-Iluth ~ .flOw in accordance with the OTSP ~cco, .....~.-iotlo~. ~ hu*.~c,;Oa of l)iz Rol/ll,~tto Clitti Ro~ ~1 r-elix Vid~z St~t would bex~visedtoumi~DigRomi/F. elixValdezSueetatlm~"~mut~- This impmvemm will be cousuuct~ in Phase 2 when uaffic demand is s,mcie~ to justify its comms:tion. 4. Western Bv~a: The Western Bypass Road is ideafled in fig Ge~gml Plan and will be consmg:u~ from its imptm.~ou with State Highway 79/I~ 1S i~e~ W~hi,~ a right-of-way rigsigned for a fouz- iaue divided roadway. The By-Pros would be co~ north along ~ Csmeral Plan ,lignm~t umil it ~ with an extension of Vizeut Moraga Drive. Vize~ Momga Drive would be ext~uded m tl~ southwest from its present tetmium in the constrm:g~ industr~ Pads thr°ught°theWestffnBy'Passwhich is located just west of these pads. This route would requi~ cousumion of another bridge across Murriem Creek. ]kcause thi~ mad is essential to m:cess the WHd West Atom and hotrJ, it will be ~ during Phase 1. 5. Puiol Sireel: Pujol $u-~t will be exumded south Io in~rsect with the Wesun By-Pass. This improvemere will be co~ during Phase 1. 6. MaluSu'eeu MainSu~.twillbemodifiedmbemsupl~rtPedemiuamtlocalmmsitcimli°ufr°m theOldTowucot~ax~awtheAxemsi~e- The biile will also be eveumally xepll:ed in acx:c~daze wit the OTSP. It has wt yet beeu d.erml.,,,.d whether fwi.~ fadlipy will be improved duri~ Phase I or P!me 2. 7. Sidew~iklC,-b lemrov,wn, m~: Mior ~, such ~s sidewalim and cufos will be irarolled aloul F. rout Sueet, south of Fust Su~,- These improverams will be ~ during Plxase 1. 8. Ramto Californl- ltmi1-15 lnf,.~wo,,ve l,,lmv~e,,,,: The mrth boumi on-romp on the 1-15 al Ram:bo is srhed,,ied for impl_~e,~Hon, bul may not be lieled duri~ Phase 1 because it is also depeslem 9. TrafficMm--o,.mentOmion~: Wie,intheceulxaiporliouofOiaTown, oue or two of the east-w~I slxe~ls (FourtSu, eet, MaiSixeet, orThixdSl) my be closed lo vehiculu lntc aud become Pan of the unvu location of the lown squa~ my vary depe, w4hl upou the City's conelion relardinl the bel alive location for the square. S The circulation system improvements that are essential to adequately access the proposed facilities are antic~ m be con.muc~ and placed in operation during Phase I (1996), if the project is approved by the City. It is anticipated that the Phase 2 Circulation.system improvements can be completed in support of the OTSP as they are appropriate. The sffeetscape in the Old Town area will be constructed to meet the design guidelines contained in the OTSP. This can include rolled curbs, wooden boardwalk, street amenides (such as benches).~-and covered arcades. 3.2.4 parl lne Fatalities "' After careful evaluation the City has preliminarily concluded that'Centralized parking on the periphery of the Old Town will best serve the land use concept contained in the OTSP and proposed in the Westside Specific Plan. The following fac~ities arc proposed. 1. From Su'cctYarlrln~ Arcs: Between 450 amid 1,000 parkl-~ spaces will be provided along the west side ofFront Sueet- At ~25f~per sps:e, sppmximawJy3.S s~s will be d~vo~d to Psxki~. 2. Sixth Street pari~n~, ,~rea: A parking lot is proposed north of Sixth Stxzet. It is nnricilPted that approxima~y440patking~wiHbepxtndd~on~rad~atthisiocatio~ butaparl4n.~~could be constmc~ if deemed economically fun'ble. An ax~t of appt~;,,,,~-ty one to two ac~s will be devoted tothispaxtin_~a~a. It will be commz~! during Phase l. 3. Axing/Hotel pnririn~ .A~a: Pa~n_~ slmzs and/or a pat+in~ ~ will be provided adjacent m the AP,,na and the hotel. It is anticilnl~ that 1,700 lnrirln~ spates will be provided fDr the At~n on approximatfly 12.7 acres of land. An estim,~ 510 pazking stalls will be ptovid~ in suRxm of Old Town Pinsel. Overflow pnrHn~: If mtuiml, overflow parking areas my be comtmcl~ eit!~r adjacent to Pujol Su~t n~ar its ptopose, d 'int~,~tlon with the Western By-Pass or ~o the north along Vincent Moraga Road. be implesnes~ dining Phase 1 if mluired. It is expected that a total of 3,200 permanent parking stalls will be provided to support the project and development within the OTSP. The oveffiow parking areas are envisioned to provide an additional 1,025 parking spaces for a total of 4,225 spaces. The acttml number of parking stalls required will be determined prior to appwval of the project and each phase will be conditioned upon actual City parking requirements. 6 C. ~.N'VTRO~~t, I~EYIEW ~-, The entire administrative reomi, (including the Draft EIR, Technical Appendices and attachments, publi~ cx~nments and City Staff repom, and these facts, findings and mment of overriding comideratiom) ~ as the basis for the City's environmental determination. The detailed environmental impa~ and proposed mifi""""~on measures for the Old Town Redevelopment Projeet are preaented in Chapt~ 4 of the E]R and in the responses to comments which are pan of the EIR. Altermtiv~ m the propreed projeet are dis~us~l in Chapter 5 of the EIR. Evaluation of growth inducement and irrevers~le commitment of reso~ is provided in Chapter 6 of the EIR. The following findings contain a summary of the fac~s used in making determinations for each environmental issue addressed in the EIR and Initial Study. The City of Temecula and The Zev Buffman Group initiated-the proposed pwject in early 1994. To assist with processing the CEQA environmental docmentation, the City retained Tom Dodson & Associates to support the independent review of the project. The City retained qualified experts to prepare technical evaluatiom of major environmental issues for use in pe~orming its independent review of the project. The following list summarizes the pwjea CEQA review milestones. The Initial Study was completed by the City on June 23, 1994. The Notice of Preparation for the project was issued on July 8, 1994 for 30 day public review. A public scoping meeting was held for the project by the City on June 23, 1994. The Draft EIR was released for public review on December 7, 1994. The public comment period began on December '1, 1994 and extended to January 25, 1995. The Final EIR was released to Responsibi~ and Trustee Agencies that commented on the Draft EIR on April 5, 1995. The City PIning Commission reviewed and recommended approval of the proposed project, including certification of the Final EIR and adoption of Statements of Overriding Consideration, on May 15, 1995. The City Council reviewed and approved the project, including certification of the Final EIR and adoption of Statements of Overriding Comiderafion, on ????..?, 1995. D. FtND~ Presented below are the environmental findings made by the Temecula City Council after its review of the documents referenced above and consideration of written and oral comments on the Old Town Redevelopment Project (proposed project) submitted to the Planning Commission and City Council at a public hearing, including all other information provided during the decision-making process. These findings provide a summary of the information contained in the EIR, related technical documents, and the public hearing record that have been referenced by the City Council in making its decision w approve the Master Conditional Use Permit, Westside Specific Plan, Tentative Tract Map, Developmere Agreement, and other actions, required to implement the proposed project. The EIR pfct)ated for the project evaluated seven (7) nmjor environmental issue categories for potential significant adverse i_ .mpacts. These major environmental issue categories are: air quality, biological resources (plant and animal life), noise, land use, uanspormfion/circulafion, aesthetics and visual resources, and cultural resources. When cumulative impacts were included, the EIR reached a total of 14 findings on environmental issues. Short- and.' long-term impacts and project specific and cumulative impacts were evaluated for each phase of the proposed project. Some of the issue categories contained several subissues which are summarized below. Of these 5 major environmental categories, the City Council concurs with the findings in the EIR that the issues and subissues 6i~o,~ed below can be mitigated below a significant impact threshold, or for those issues which cannot be m~ .below a level of significance, that overriding considerations exist which maiz those impacts acceptable. In addition to the 7 major environmental issue categories addressed in the EIR, twelve (12) other major environmental issue categories (earth resources, water resources, light and glare, nann'al resources, risk of upset, population, housing, public services, energy, utilities, human health, and recreation) were found to be nonsignificant in the Initial Study prepared for the proposed project. The City Council concurs with the findings on these environmental issue categories as outlined in the Initial Study (Appendix 8.1 of the EIR). ..- Those environmental issue categories identified in the Initial Study as having no potential for significant adverse impact, with or without mitigation, are described below in Section D. 1. The descriptions in Section D. 1 include substantiation from the Initial Study. Each of the potentially significant, but mitigable, effects of the proposed project identified in the EIR are described below (Section D.2.), including substantiation from the EIR, associated documents and/or the hearing record. Unavoidable (unmitigable) significant adverse impacts of the project are described in Section E of this document. An analysis and comparison of the alternatives to the project are described in Section F of this document. Project benefits are described in Section G. The balancing of benefits and impacts and the statement of overriding considerations are described and evaluated in Section H of this document. All mitigation measures identified in the EIR and Initial Study are addressed in the Mitigation Monitoring/Reporting Program which is included as pan of the decision-making record for this project. Implementation of the monitoring pwgram will ensure that the measures identified in the EIR will be implemented in accordance with discussion in the EIR and as required by Public Resources Code Section 21081.6. These measures are within the jurisdiction of the City to implement, but some measures may require other agencies to participate in the monitoring program. 8 D.1. Non..Sig~itieant Imp°e~ Identifiod in ttm Initiol ,qmdy The following issues were identified in the In'nial Study as having no poznt~! to cause significant impact and were not carried forward into the EIR for detailed evaluation. In the following presemtion each resource issue is identified; it is followed by a description of the poznfial significant adverse environmenial effect (Potential Significant Impact); a discussion of the finding in the adminisntive record, which is predomir~ntly the Initial Study,. Notice of Preparation and responses~ technical appendices, and referenced documents; any mitigation measures that will be implemented to achieve a non-significant impact are identified; and finally, a discussion of the facts supporting the finding are summarized. .-- The City of Temecnla City Council hereby finds that all mi'ugation measures identified in the Initial Study that will be implemented to mitigate the.impacts of this pwject have been incorporated into, or required of, the proposed project to avoid or substantially lessen the following potentially significant environmental impacts to a level. of insignificance. Public Resources Code Section 21081 states that no public agency shall approve or carry out a project for which an environmental imtma report has been completed which identifies one or more significant effects unless the public agency makes one, or more, of the following findings: Such changes or altamions are willfin the r~lxmsibility and jurisdiction of ether public aSency and such chan&~ have been adolxed by such aZeacy or can and should be adopted by such other a~, and/or Specific economic, social or other con,~der~6ons make inf~sible the mifi~on musures or projea al~mfives idemi~ed in the envkomutmal ~ report. The Temecuh City Council hereby finds, pursuant to Public Resources Section 21081, that the following issues are non-significant because they have no potential to cause a significant impact or because mitigation measures will be implemented as outlined below. The City Council further finds that no additional mitigation measures or project chan~es are required to reduce the potenthi impacts discussed below to a level of nonsignificance and that no additional project changes have been made during the public review of the proposed project. These issues and the measures adopted to mitigate them to a level of insignificance are as follows: 1. Sara Resources: Potew~ ~nmcut bnpact: Fmdin_~: The urnruble earth issues m di-~t~,tt'd hi the Initial Sl:!ldy, Chapl~r 8, Sectloll 8.1 of the HR. The analysis of utth imabUity issues presemed in the miti~ Study conchuled tUa~ rue pommig for significaut imp~cm can be miuced or comxoned if the pmjea is developed ~s proVo~ anti with implemenmion of specific miu'pdon meum~ as ou~ima below. The nu'fiSmion measu:~s 9 2. Earth Resources: D~rb F,x'~'ng Soil Resources Potential Sifnificant Impact: Disturbance of soils during trading my expose Rgm to significant minion 77w applicarg ~ prepare and .u~mif a derailed m'osion conzrol plan tj~u ~ specific ero~on conlrol measures lo control artsite and a]~sile era&ion from ~he rime she erosion control plan shall include rise followin8 measures as a minimum.' 10 ~ the timing of Imding and commtahm to minimize soil taposure to ~nter ra~ pt~ad ap~__~_~ in southern CaYlvrnia. wiU raX be dismrbad for Smd~ (the a~m ~s areas thar ms~ ~ an~ revelrenal as part of a jbe. l modifi~ prolram to protea residences from wildland ~ra). All slopes tlurt wal be grtater than tm fttt hilh shall be evaluated w define the ol~nmm length and ztt~ts:u to rginimize flow velo~y and erosion potenaaL to tramport flows in a rantrolled, non-erodible channel "' areas shall be p~ow. ttd thro~lh 1) physical smbiliz~on (such as geot~iles, ma~, or other mat~als (where _~__,~ d); 2) vegaafire smbaiza~n; ond3)mulch~. F, smb~h s~lir,~nt traps, sat fences, and related ~ugport features The channel designed to transport flows to the nearest regional flood control facility shall be described and the adequacy of the channel shall be dtnumsvattd with a detailed drainage analysis. An inspection and maintmance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on- or offxite will be corrected through a remaaation or restoration program within a specOrted time frame. All disturbed areas shall ultimately either be covered ~ impervitau nuue~ or revegetated with native and/or fire and drought resisumt vegetation. The developer shall ~ a bond amount for impltmmting the erosion amtrol program and provide the City with a bond for this amount. L Insma permanent erosion control and runoff faci ll ries that are sv~ ~i mt to ensure that surface runoff will not cause long-term t~osion on- or ~. (~ofmwarer ~ua~ty Ta$~ Fon~e, 1993). Facts in Support d the Finding The soU distuxtmnz ims~ dimmim in thc sub6m~-don m:tion of th~lnitial Study (Pqm 10 ~ 1~ inn imi~titatumimiyinls~withinfi~OIdTowncoreareaaw~y~imnbedand~l~mlvelYfiMandt~,e Within tile p~OjeCt al~ tO ~ ~ paOpOY~ ~ could ~ tl~didOrml ~ ballacts. TIle proposed midpdon~.~-.s will comml tny pom~hl ht:u~~~~'i cmnl~vc crosion bnpa~nd areas exposed m surb~mnoff, and the co~ecdon of any ~ Sem~mt on thepmlm~ by impleme~g the the proposed project m a no~sc~, k-vd. Ttme thanSin in the project are tb~ mpomibilip/of the Cip/m monitor and they win be ~l~.e~-m-d by the City and the ReSiomi Water Quality Confro! Board (Geaffat Consu~on Smnnwater Permit) as pan of its wview and approval authority when the proposed project is bein~ developed. .-' 3. F, ar~ Resources: Gradinl and Slope Modification ~ activity on ~ slopes (15~ or $x. eaeff) in the Westside Specific Plan aRa could cause si~pifi~m potential for slope failu~, erosion, and clamage in the visual setling during or following completion of grading. :' F'mdiHg: The ~xadin~ and slope modifir~4On iSSueS aec dlSC~,~X,~I in the Initial Study, Chapter 8, Section 8.1 of axe BIR. The amdysis of gradin~ and slope modificarlon issues presc~ in the Initial Study ~m:lud~ that ti~ slolm mbfiit'y and ~on i~ m t~htced to a nonsignificant level by measu~s implew~for ismes land 2 alx~e. Tl~only a~ea wi,h pote~jal siSnificant impact due grading would be the modified topography caused by iwt~aili~g t!~ We$1~'B Bypa~ Road with conuolled if the project is developed as ~ and with implem~tmdon of the specific mitigation mmmn as oufiined below. The mitigation measm i0endfled in the Initial Study will fotlowing nansin is requixed to be implemem~d: A landscape plan shall be completed for reffew and approval by the Chy. This plan shall provide for full reveS, etation of the wad cut slopes utilizin8 nativelomanumal plants m~h ~ll s~rve as a ~re bv~er ~ On dw ~ ~ gads the landsca~ plan shall include ~ ~ of larSe rr~es (m~mum ,l' diamaer)~ely offer construction of the pads is completwI. The effect of the reveReration plan will be w blend the slopes into zhe natural coastal saSe scrub and dsamisal chalxv'mi wmmunizie$ w6t of the Wesze'n By-Pass Road. The rtmqemrion Sod for the pads will be to v~zally screen ard soften the e~ffea of the fia~, Srat~ ard pm~ pa~. A bord or equimleu conmaizme=, as provided l~, City ordinance, shall be provided by the de~dop~ w ensure rJVaz ~ ~w can ~e revelerawd ~ g~. Facts in Support of the ~ The gnuring and slopemodification issue discussion in the subs,~nd=,ion section of the Initial Study (Pages 11 and 12, iu:m 1 .c) indicates that slope modifications in all areas except along the Western Bypass Road ~l~8.-.~'m will 12 13 Fam in Support of the Fmding Changes in siltalion, deposition or erosion ... pos=tiany sipis,---, dammac m me si~ or downstrmn propels. F'mding: The diMoK, depodtioll arid earldOn polzalfial i az~ dl.5~mmmed in rig Initial Stlldy, Section 8.1 of the E~. The analysis of these issues pd,&engd in the Initial Study concluded that if time project is drvdoimd as pwposed amd with implem-nndOn Of the specific mitigadon nansure as outlined under imme/2 above. The mi~ilad,:m nansan id,,dfi-d in the initial Study will cbang~ tl~ la'oject by co.d~onln_w poumfial ezraion and se, dlmem~don tlaat may be uttm~ by gnding the Westsid~ Specific P~n n No additional initiation is tmzluh'ed tmyond re=sure identified above. Faro in Support of the Finding The potential siltation, deposition and erosion discusdon in the environmental evaluation seaion of the Initial Study (Page 12, item l.f) indicates that the potential for these impacts to occur will be substantially incressed when the Westside Specific Plan aria is developed. Watff erosion potnztial. with te!~_,.d dimion and depoddou, has addressed under isam/2 above and based on these facts, the City concludes that adequate measures are available to reduce dimion. deposition and erosion imtmas from ixnple,~-x~ng the proposed project to a nonsignificant level. No additional mitigation is requized beyond iw~,lesnes~n_q mitigatio~ ~ #3 to colltol these hnpacts on the project site. 7. Modification of a Channel, Creek or River Potential SiSnifi~snt ImpS: The proposed projea could came dg~i~cm allration to tiac Munim Cx~Jc chaund. TI~ Murrieta Creek channd modification issues ge diSC'e.-Sed in thC ~nitial Study, .Chapt~ 8, Section 8.1, oftbe EIR. The -,m[ysis ofchamad modification issues ptesem~ in thelnitial StudY couciuded that the imp~ fzom clmm~l mO~,'-dOnS mgSoci~'d With bridge installation axe mtuced to a mn~8~ifi,"~'~ lcve, l by mitiBation measures impl~ to control intrusion into the dinrod. This pou~ial fo~ si~i~c-3,m ~ modi~catioE impact can I~ x~tuc~d ot coattoLiod if tl~ ptojea is dwdoped ag pzolx~ ~d with i,~lm,,.,~,ioa of ti~ st~ific mifigatims m~sm~s ts oudinEd below. Ti~ mx'fir~tioa m~asur~ idmtifi~i h tl~ Inidd Study will eh,,..~ tl~ pm.j~'t by conu*ouine im~usion imo th~ chtm~ trot mim~g co~P~y with tl~ final flood conn*ol The bridges shall be installed in a manner that will not adversely impact the ability of Murrieta Creek to carry the design flows established by the Corps of Engineers and the 14 Riverside Cotmty l~Nzl Comrol and Wam' Cmuervaam Distr~. Perm~ or waiv~rs from suc~ pernats for ~ of ~ bridSa ~ ~ ol~ained from t~e Corps o/ Dm~ construction of ~ bridges sp~c erosion and sediment .corurol measures siwdl Measures w accomplish ~ include diverting any surface water around tl~ projecz site, mmsura w nace it transport of s~/meu from axe amsmaa/on arm' 'dur/nS The channel meai~c~cm issue dl,qa~dOn in the SubSrods"On section of tbe Initial Study (Pagu 12 and 13, itgm across Munieta Creek in support of the !mapreed project will tunIt in some to a ' 'ticant level based ~ The modificadom and their effect on thc Munieta Cteek clmm~ can be teduced nons~m no adverse impact and to meet the ultima~ design tequitm3nm of the channel. No potential for cumulative contributions to chaxmel modifications ~ ideml~ed wiOfi- the proji~'t m to which fig pmpos~ pzoj~ct could charnel modifications by m~iwn~inlng flood t~lffol fillgtiOtl~ Of th~ Chillill alid ~ fig Ulljlla~ di~ligB ~ for the chatm~l. Thus. the project is not ~ m comxibug to ditto or cumulativ~ sigt~ficant ehnnnel mOdi~catiOD iZDpOCtS. ]~ OD these faCtS, Ihe City concludes that adequate measures arc available to zeduce channel modification impacts from ixnplem-ndng the ptoTgs~ project to a no, tei~mi~c=,nt level The eh9n_~eS in 'the project ate the tcspomibility of the City m moni~o~ and it will,be implemen,,'d by the City as pan of its review and approval authority when the ~ project is being developed. 8. Geologic Hazards: Exposure w Geologic Hazards Potential Significant Impact: The proposed project my expose suuctuzes or persons so impacts usociaugi wid, geologic hazards. Finding: The geologic h9'~rdissugsazedi-~'n~ledinthelnlda!Study'C]iaplgrS'Secd°n8'l'Ofthe~ The azlalysis of geologic bazazd issues presented in the Initial Study concluded that the potnnial impacts ftotn geologic b-,,,rds at both the Old Town cote atu and Westside Specific Plan area az~ miazd to a ,,o,~iV,lnc',,, level by midpdon ~.a.~es outtingd below. The mitipdon /e.s are t~luind to be implem,.m,.d: 7. All new smaaura installed in am/~ wi~ this project shall be designed to comply Geologist/l~Sisrered EnSineer ia, mafies more string~at sitt speafic aesign sinhaaS. t~e dv,eloper St~ impSmerit suc~ smam~ for buildinSs constmaed unar appromb for ~ project. 15 , Facts in Support of tim ~ ~e g~ologic hazatti imm di.,Cu~Skm in fig Hlm,,min~o~ m:tion of fig Initial Study (Pagm 13 ~d 14, imm 1.h and L~ighton & A~me;e,~ ~aady) indimms that m g~olo~ imgmls am iraown to affu:t tim Old Town corn area or dxe Wemide Speci~c p!au area ofiser emt m~rml gxomsd shakiag mt smbilisY isszs- Tl~pmj~t sim stability issucshavelg~aaddmamluad~im#labov~andnofunlmrmralmtionor~mlingsmtaluimL 'rig regional gtouml shakiag at tim proj~t sire is pommia!ly siimi~,~m as outlimd in th~ ~ Study, but project dmaSm can be mime this impat m a nomiE~fie'm level based on impl~momlng the mifitmiOn ~ idellti~ed above. $tm~atal designs ate m~tul to ~mply with design mluimmmts of the mint minuet Unified BuDdln- C. ode or Geologim~-,xg mctize~t or ommive signifigant seim~impam. BasinloamY, the Cit~concludes that adequam meama~ ag available to teduc~ seismic impa~ from implemL. miag the prolmsed project to a nonsignifi~am level. The changes in ~ project ate the ztapomibility of the City to monitor and it will be implemented by the City as part of its review ami approval -_,,fhOtit~ when fig pmpcs~ project is tging developecl. 9. Geologic Hazards: Seismic Hazard~/Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone Potential Signifi~,,f Impact: On sire gttmad mpa~ h-,~rds ~mid ~ p~ or human lira at tig pmjm sire. F'mdiilg: TIg Alquist-Priolo Zo~ hazant issues ate di.~,~ed ill ~ Lllitial Sl~iy, CJ3~pt~ 8, Seclioll 8.1 oftheEIR. Th~aualysisofscismichazatdimumpzum~intlglaitialSmdYgoncludadthatn° proporal. No mitigation is mluimd bamm tim pmjm sim is not llxamd wi,hi- an Alquim-Priolo Facts in Support of Findim,_ Tig s~immic hamd/Aiquist-P~olo Sl~ Stu~ Zom~ di~ou ia the ~uvixouug~ evalumiou saxiou of Iaifial Study (1~ 14, item 1.i) imiicmms / lmmj~t site is aot within auy Alquist-Priolo Sp~:ial Smdka Zing. 16 10. Air Quality: Alteration of Local or Regional Climate Variables .d, ae~a.lo~ of local or regional ~ could adve~ely ~ the !mmanpopulmioniocamlwithintbf~arcas- Stud~ con~!ud~ that no poesial for sil~sp,w clbna~ inmaas will occur if th~ pmjea is {L-veloped~spmpmed. NomitiSafionistequixed. Fins in Support of Findin~ 11. Changes in Currents or the Come or Direaion of Water Movements damage due to altering the dixcction of watff movement. .-- Finding: The changes in dizecfion of water movement ismes axe di.w--ssed in ttac Initial Study. Chaptff 8, Section 8.1, of the IHR. The -.utysis of ,-~,,.oes in direction of water movement issues presented can bc mtuced to a nonsignificant level by the mitigation measu~ implemented to control the flows in their revimi course to Muftieta Creek. This potential for significant impacts from c. ongi~ t!~ direction of water flow can bc mtuced or conu~ned if the project is developed as proposed and with ~m~lem~,nriOn Of the specific mitigation measu~ as outlined below. The following measure is t~quix~d to be implemented: 10. The surface runoff drainage system incorporated into the Western By-pass road and the hotel and Arena eng'meered development pad(s) shall be designed ~o mee~ the foLlow~ ~ drainage system slmll be designed w transport the ageaed lOO-yem' rmeff from upstream areas or ~ pad(s) to M~ Cred~ withouz damage ro adjacent properly or to the Cred~ channel,' and to ensure ttmt headward (upstream) erosion is not initiata~l and that erosion and sediment gmeration do not axad natural rates of erosion and sedimmmtion for the project area. The drain~e tylm. from the pad(s) to Muftieta Creek shall also be dailned to prevau ~as~ ero~on along the drainage system onprovemaus and ,u the po~t where the suryace nmoff ~om r~e pa~rs) en2rs the Credc channel. 17 The chtnge in water'flow diteaion issue d~,,~dt~On in the svbs*-ml-0on seaion of the Initial Study (Pagm 17 and 18,~t,,m3.a) indicanstbstnoucofthctnz.~~intbeOidTowncotcmuwillmodifYtbcdilecdou comibudo~s m sna~ flow molf-'~ons w~ ideed~ witBe the pmjea a~a Io which/e pt~x~zd project co, ddcom~bugadd~dmaltdv~t~im~ Tnisis_~--~,~-devaoimzmtisno~pmpomi~of~ W~mide Specific Phn area. The pmpemi mi~iga~ion measure will wnffol any pommial funwe surface flow mc~ifi~,6om impscis. Bssed on fizse fs~s, the City wnchadzs ths~nzssnu sze available mmduce su~uc fiow zedize~on knpa~s flora impie,.s~,'alng the ptBpos~ plojea IDa nnn~ig~i~csm level. The challg~ in the pmjea am the mspomibility of the City m monitor and it will be implemam:d by the City as pan of i~s zeview sml 12. Water Resources: Incre~e in Impervious $u2,'face The '.uuperviotls sa~fac~ isstles Ire die,~aqsed in the ~ SVidy, Chlp~ 8, Section 8.1, of the EIR. The analysis of ira* te~qcd rimoff i,mm,~ p,~,f,n~ in the Iitial Study concluded that the impscis fxom chsnSes in flow she ver~ limi=d in scope sad csn be zeduced level by imple, n-e~Z one of two midgadon mes,sm~ m comzoi ~ volume of surlce nmoff in volume of surlce flow cau be zechzed or wnffolled if the pmj~t is developed ss pmpos~ and with implee~0tmlon one of mi'uBadon messuzes as outlined below. One of the followhi messuzes is zquixed to be I I. When the de~lop~ pads are mgineered and consmwted within the Westside 5pec~c Plan Area, the surftwe runoff abo~ the wlume preseuly generated shall be detained on the project size and relmsed appraxima~dy 24-hours after peak fio~s within Uurriem "Creek have passed through the project are~ 12. project. The project shall also contribute its fair share w any chanttel impw~ments that muff be wmplet~ to insure that cumulazi~e runoff increases do not cause dmmswmm flood hazards or significa~ damage from surface rmoff in Muftieta Cree~ and the $anva M~ Ri~er. Facts in ~pport of FireuriC_ The increase rimoff issue diq.n~W in the subs*-mi,..io~ sectioa of tbe Initial Study (htges 18 and 19, item 3 .b) ~ dur tbc volmn~ in the 01d Town cot~ n will runain Ic same oF ~ only ,imi,~l ~ in volume _ben,,_~- this area is alresdy 100~ developed msi the nmoff coeeficieat is alveaiy .95 to 1. The corm~,~tion of the Western Bypass Road and development of the Westside Specify: PLan will alter the au-zent rimoff coetScient from 18 .~-.7 to .95 to 1. The iamm~vohnne of fiow and its dfnm:t on the Muffieu Cteek chumel can be teduced to a non~igpifinm level based on implem,-~-g one of the ,,~i,ip~on ~u ide,,~fied above. No potential f~r cumulati~ contributions to surface flow mndi~ic-~ ~ idnti~d wi~:i- th~ ptoj~t n m which th~ p~opose. d WestsideSpecificPlanatu- Tncp, opas~dm~p~nmum~wiilcontrolanypo~shlfnn~~innn'fa~ in the project are the rmlx~m'bility of the City to monitor and it will be implem~grd by the City as part of its 13. Water Resources: Al2ring Flood Potenfisl S~zwnificant Impact: ,Al~,r~sion of F'mding: Tbe flood flow ~tm. tion iuu~ ate di.~,~ed in the Initial Study, Clapt~ 8, Section 8.1, of the EIR. The analysis of altentiom to flood flow iuu~ p~e..s, dzd in the Initial Study coz|uded that no pot~mig for sig~ific-m ~ or in=x~ase in surfa~ rimoff (irons 11 and 12 above) will occur if the project is developed as ptolgsed. No sit!dltlop-~ mitigation is x~quix~d. Facts in Support of Finding The discussion of poumaal alteration in flood runoff and potential flood irare-as is pmvkled in the envitomu~ evaluadon secaon of the Inidal Study (Pa~ 19, i~em ~.c). T~ salysis indica~ with connois on the increase of volume of fio~s and dhecfion axat no siSnificau~ al~eradon in flood flows will occur duc to implem~on of the on these fac~s, the Cit~ concludes tluu ~ ai2~iom of flood ~o~s mi flood b~,~nls from imple,v~n~ the proposed project will be nonsi~ific~xt without any kaddifiOp*I mi~.~llfiOli O~ Oth~ rhn%~ m the project, beyolld mca,sur~ 10, 11, and 12 outlia~ above. 14. Water Resources: Change in the Volume of Surface Water Potential Significant Impact: C~-_o~s in the volume of surface water dowmu'eam from the site that could cause additional ~oodi~ or damage m the wu:r body. Findln_~: The surface watff volume issues are dlsc-~sed in the Initial Study, Chapact 8, Section 8.1, tithe Ell. Tne analysis of altmtiom to surface water volume issues pa. sattai in the Initial Study concluded that no potential for significant ~.-,,_oe Cmctease or decruse) in surface water voltmac (i,m,t~ 11 and 12 above) will occur if the project is developed as proposed. Although the volume contribut~ to Muftiera Creek will ~, it will not be added during a period where hgteases Facts in Support of Ftnd|n_o ThedisctmionofpotenfialPh,noesinsm'facewaterinawatffbodYamiP°tential ~oodhazatdsorffosionimpacts is provided in the envi~~evaluation sinion of the Icnitial Study (Page 19, itna 3.d). The analysis indicates with controls on the inause of volume of fio~s and direction that no si~,iSc-nt alnnfion in flood hantds or erosion will occur due to implcmem~rlon of the tzoposed ptojecL Thus, the project cannot contrilmte addhioml advene flood t,,--~d or erosion impacts. Based on tlsse facts, the City concludes that potential altemions of 19 15. Water Resources: Surface Water ~udify Delradation FandinS: TIme suxfacc water quality dc~on issues axe di,~ws, k-d in the Initial Study, Chapter 8, Section in smlz ml csa be mixsl m · nomi_m, int-,nt k'vel by imp, lemeslp~ tlz mifigsi~/d m This prossial fo~ significant impacs tram distargs of sm~lz rimoff can be mtuml or wazm~ediffi~pmjectisdevdopedasvt~po~iaxsiwithimple',~*ionthemitigafion~ the City to vaify runoff controls are adeq.,,,e to prem= inadvermu xurfa~ nmo~. 14. The project osym's simll prepare and implamst a smeeping plan approved by the City w sweep lxwat artas and graded parldag arms one agne Per we~ az a minimum, and at lmff six ~imes during the month of October prior w the onset of the winre' swrm 15. from the project site. Tkese procedura sitall be incorporattd into a written procedure ~ mu~ be approval by the City Planning Department and the P, egiom~ Water ~ Control Board. 16. /~ry surface water gmantad from the stable areu shaH ei~er be raaina~ treat~ and muse~ on the pfojea s~te, 'or treated to uandar~ re~ to pro~__,~__ the ~ water quality $mndar~ for Murriata Credo IMfore ~ released from the projeff xire. The Wata' ~L)~d/~ Conn-ol Board. Facts in Suppart of Finding The surface waxer d~p'adation discussion in the subs~mlmlon section of the Initial Study (Pages 19 and 20, item 3~e)indicamst~atthedisd~~~~inthe~ldT~wnc~teamawil~~emint~~same~ri~~ur~n~ylimimiin~tmein consmx~on of the Wmmn Bypass Rind and deve~ and opn~im of tlz Westside Specific Plan will alter during construction and opention can be r~haced m a mnsiS~i~c:ax~ level based on impienwn~ng th~ mltiJStiOn measu~S iClmi~ above. No potmial for cumulative contri~rions to nn'fa~ rimoff ~gra'a°tion ~ icimified 2O widaindacprojcctamwbichthep.op0nedlarojectcouldmmiMmaddidomladvcmimlancm' Tbis is because ~,~ developms is not la~ uf~,r, ma of due Wemide Specific l:qma azea. The p,va~ome~ minipdOn ..- ', ~.... S will c~x~nyIxx~lfu~F~e~a~i~n~fp~llu~n~bs~u~c~y~c~8~dmee~i~g~u~b~d~s~F tbCplOpOy.,dFjenCttOanOn. dFdReenf]eveL .i-l~dlallg~hlth~ptoje~lfeb~bilityoflheC-jtYalidthe " p, egiomlBoazdwmonitoran~itwillbeh:m~bybCitYamibP-egi°nalB°trdM~°f~~ 16. Water Resources: Altering the Direaion and Rate of Groundwmer Flow .. Po~endd Sirdne-'* ~ ChaSes in dm dim sion mt ~ of $wmxiwser flow could cause Fivmn~: TI)C pofei)~al ::ll~-fTdo9 i~ dileCtiOD SOd ~ste 0fF)UDdWSI~ fl0w iSSu~ EC di.SCumked hi the XDith[ Stmiy, Chapter 8, Section 8.1, of tbc ~ The aaalysis of d,e~done to Foundwater flow issues pn:scntcd in the Luidal Study coar. hadd dm no potendsl fro' siLndfi,'.,a, aitentions in Foundwas=r flow dizection ,,~ me will occur if b proje::t is dc. veop~as pwposd because the project will or O!k"ndCm~· No mi~dOn iS ~ The di=usdou of F.mbi alundons in dixecdon aud me of Wmashvamr now impacts is provided in'me envi(omuaitaJ CVabmdOD section of die hlitial Study (hie 2,0, item 3.f). The astlysis indlc~yes tiat the Dropoa~ project does not pose any acti~ties with a potndal W cause any altcration ba dine rate of gzouaiwa~ flow or direction- Thus, the project cannot contribute any adverse gromsiwat~ impact to groundwater flow or direction- Based on these facts, the City concludes that potential alk-rations to groundwater flow and direction cannot occur as a result of implem~ri~g the proposed project. No mitigation oz odgr ,-h-_,,~S W the project are required. 17. Water Resources: Groundwater Effects Potential Sipi~_~.~ Impact: Grotmdwater te&outces could be sig~dtqc~tly overtrutland by the groundwater quantity issaags aze di.,qC-mped in tbc Initial Study, (::hspl~ 8, Section 8.1, of the analysis of ,a.~-rm;ionm in Fmuxiwa~ quaadty ~ in the Luitial Study com'luO'd groundwat~ tesoun:es. No mitigation is nxluized. Facts in Support d the Find~ The discunion of Femid Smumiwa~r rmouxce impacre is pxovided in dac awkv.-.-"-,-: waluadon smaion of d:e 21 18. Water Resourca: Reduction in Water Resources Available for Water Supply Finding. Thewamtmpply~immated;~t~$~dinthelnitia!StmtY, C!ml~8, SeoionS. l, ofthe ~ The aualyis of d~a~iom in waft tesmm~ availability p,t.;.mcd in the Initial Study concludst that .no pmmfial for sigtdS,,,-nt hnpm::t to wa~r sulaply ,csom. cu will occur if the l~Lec~_is~asptopogdbecamgtl~pmjectdoumcom~activifimthat~ilim~ue FaminSuppmoftimF'mding Thedizu~ionofpotmiai wamzsupply tesomcehqmms ispmvidedintheenvito.~.,~rsd evaluationsmion ofthe Initial Study (Pa~ 21, imm3-h). Tne amly~is imlicmm thstthe ptojm:t~al not haveasig~ficm adv~se~ on wat=r ~.~uta. s because adequg wamf rapply tctp-ors haw been ide,~ed f~r full buildout of the City ata from ilxlpl~*~ti~g the ptopogd ptoject will be !lom~ipific~nt witho~ ally mhitadOn Or other rh~m_o~S ID the 19. Water Resources: Flood Hazards Finding_: The flood hazard issues ate dlsc,,~9~cl in the Initial Study, Chapmr 8, Section 8.1, of the EIR. The n,~lysis of flood han~ issues pzesenmd in the Initial Study c~zluded that a pOlm,d,~ for signi~aut flood h*--nlS will oo~ if the project is developed as proposed. The pommial flood h~nrd impacts from project mlamci smzctums am very Hmimd in ~ and can ~ xmdut:ed to a nonsignificant level by implemendng ti~ mldguion musturn m couttol th~ location of mxu~utm aud the extant of exlum~ of smumn~ to flood imntds. This pov~,s for signlfit,-~ impam from flood h-,~niS can be teduml or comforted if tim project is developed as ptoposul mi with implemLmsfion the mitigation ngtstu~ as outlimd below. The following musu~ is t'equimt to 17. Bridges and entertainn2nt structura and ~ $hall be insllgled in a manner that protects them from significant damage from a lO0-year flood along Murrieta Creek. The struam'e and bridge deigns shall integratt the propo$ed fadii~e~ irgo the ~ deyign SOilliOn for ~ Crt~ being prepared ~ the Corps of Engineers and County Flood Control without cznah~ ~igni~cant ~ in managing design flood flows. 7'ire project owners shall participate in the dam ~mndation evacutratm plans for arty facz'liae. v not protecttd from the potential collapse of the Vail Lake dam. Facts in Support of Fh,a-_~ flood p}.i.; izluding smscmtes that my provide enm~inm~ Mitigation measure #17 for flood hannls will comml pomntial flood hantds to future facilities to a w,~n~igtdfi,'-m level. No pmmial for cumulative conn:amfions to flood hazaxds ~ ide,,dfied widdn the project area to which the proposed project could comn'b~ ~sitiom, s adverse impacts. This is because no other known development is proposed within the flood plain. The proposed 22 20. Plant Life: Introduction of New ,~t~,cia or Barrier to Normal Species Reple~hment .- potmfialSilnifimslmpaa: T!= imxo,,nlo- ofm ~ or ctmio~ ofa bani~ to tarreal biological te..s.~tcu. Finding: TI~ imoduaion of ~.w ~ mi bsttiixs Io t~l~.~'~'~ ~ m dlSt'm~ in tl~ liitial 5tudy,~8, Smion S. l, of tl~EIR. Tl~ptojm~ll mt imxodm~lmy n=w stnxi:s inm ~matm of miv~ vl~a~o~mt m baniezs win be amid lo t~i,,,i/~,~ of miv~ sirius Study concluded that no pmmial for ~i~sc~, resom~ imlmm win occur if .time project is developed as groposed. No mifi~dOn iS x~quited. ' The discussion of the nonnative species inuoduc~on nnd baniers Io nonmi repleni.~h,,.-,~ is pmvidul in the environmenial evaluation section of the Initial Study CPa~ 23, it~a 4.c). ~ Italysis indicalts fiat ~ae ptoj~t does not propose m iauodu~ no,,,~tlve species into t, us of ,~.,iw veSemion mi no baniers m species t~i...i,:Im-~ will be created by the proposed project. The Old Town cote amt is already totally disturbed and the Westslde Specific Plan a~a lies at the edge of the mdve plant CO,nm.m~ty that is a paztialJy disBifocal ~ Thus, the prOjeCt _Plnnat CODtZibUlg additional diml_oe tO cHDlidative biological zuougcs within the City. Based on these facts, the City concludes that potmial sp~i~s introduction and barrier et~ fa~n implem-mi~ the proposed ptoj=ct will be nonsignificant without any midgttion or ott~ chan~ to the project. 21. Plant LO~e: Reduction in Agricultural Acreage Potential Significamt Impact: TI~ In'oposed ptoj~ could cause or comzibulg to significant loss of F'mdillg: Facts in Support of ti~ Finding becaus~ the site has eilher ~ totally altered as a t,l~tlt of past activities (Old Tow~ cote m) or zmai~ in nativ= vc~-mtion (Wtstsid~ SI~cific Plan axea). Tires, the pmjea camrot conuib~ addidoml loss of ctmmlafiv= 23 22. Animal Life: lntroduaion af New Species tomubioloSical~.:sc atu. TnesmlF~oftbeszbiolo$imlzesom~ismespa. scn~intbeluidslSmdYco, rlud~dtlm No midgafiOll iS ~ Faets in Support of the Insane_ animal ~into ateas ofnndve habimt- The Old Town cote atm iS ahudy tomlly disnabed and the Westside- Specifi~ Plan ax~a lies at the edge of the nativ= plant comm,,,,ity that iS a partially dim=bed az~a. No noramire any mitigation or otigt chan~ to gig ~ 23. Animal Life: Barrier to Normal .$pecia Replenishment Poteslfial SigIdfiel~ ]l!!!lCt: T]~ CI'gafiOD Of a barrier to DOrn~l Spegi~ tgplenldtment coidd ~ significant advene efftcts to area biological tesoun:es. rmding: The banicts to reple,,i,lm,,mr issues ate dizmsed in the tnldal Study. Chapter 8, Section 8.1. of file EXR. The project will Hot / ally bOlTjetS IO 3tL. plenighment Of Bative aBitBal species within the pmject atea, except from immlLuion ofbtidges along Muniem Cteek- The analysis of tbese will be implen~w-d to prevent bridges fxom becomi.g animal migration batrich. The following l& Facts in Support of the Findln~ The discussion of barrim Io nonmi tepleni.~e of anixnal popula~om iS provided in the envito~ evaluation section of the Initial Study CPage 24, item 5.d). The analysis indi~e~ that the project does not ptelxse m czeate any bartim Io species tgpl~ni~hn,e.,r. except for potential bridge batrich in Muftieta Cter. k. iViltigarion measmg #18 for dismpdon of the mlgraflo,, corridor in Murdm Creek wi c~.,~l potntial baxtier impacts to this corridor. No potential for cmnulafive comnlufions Io banlet effias wexe idemified wie~i~ the project axea to which the ~fsignifgtn~banim-s by tu~uizing b~dge de~i$m t~pmts:t migmti~n txn.dd~r va~uts in the chamr-L Thus. the project iS not ~om2st to omtribae m dim= or onnulative sig~fic-,,r baniets to animal species teplt.~i~lmtm lhsed on these faro, the City om:ludes that ,~__a~,~_~ meum~ axt available to u~m:e pottndal animal reigndon 24 mspomibility of the Cixy to monitor and it will be iralie-.,, ,-cd by the City as pan of its review and sppmval 24. Noise: E,~sm,e to Severe Vibrations Fmdin_~: The vibration issues ~ tli.~,~a~i h the baitill SBldy, Chap2r 8, ~ 8.1, of tbc EIR. The project will not inffoducc any mw saivffies that will gincrate vibmfiom. The ,relysis .Of the Faro in Support of the Finding The disc~_k~i_'on of the ribtalon imaga is provided in the =avkou,~.ml evalmtioa.maioa of the Initial Study 76, itm 6.c). TIm amlyais indimgs tim the project does mg proproe to hmmtze any mivities ~th ribtalons project will be nomignifiPmm without any mi~gsfion ot othff c. ha~s to the project. 25. Light and Glare: Creation of Light Potemial Significant Impa~ The use of night lighting ,k-e~oci,~i with the proposed project could cause light pollution tim would adversely impact Palomar Observatory. F'mding: The light a!x! ghllr~ ~ m di.~,Ssed in rig ~ $tlKly, Chapter 8, Saltloll 8.1, of rig The project has a potmniai to crea~ liSht and glare elfera that could contribution to sipi~-t cum~!n~v~ degntdation It Palomar Obscsyatory. Tig gualy~s of Clgg figtit and Slate issues ptcscm~ in the Inifal Study concluded tim a pommial for muhtive siSni~ca~ imps~ m mcasu~ will be i~pk .... -~cd to ptcv~t light and Slate from beco~iqg an advent impact to the ObseTvatory. The following measure is required to be imp, iempm-d: 19. A lighting plan shall be ad~rt,j_et_sJ to the CitY planning Deparm2nt for re~ew and approval for fadliaes developed iyy this project. ~ plan 'shall include prior cortmlttrtion with the Cahyomia Institute of Technology for all proposed outdoor lighting designx and shall dmonstr~ compliance w~ quaatim~ve lighting requirementy contained in County of San Diego Ordinance N7LI5 and ~ounty of Ordinance #655. Facts in Support of the Fmdin~ were idcxlfi~aJ Wiffiin the proje~ al~ ID whigh the ptxlpO,~ project could contribute ~difional adveue m- This is because aisting fight pollution and fun=e developmaE cam csuse signi~e,m advasc impuas to Palomar Obsetvam~ operations. Tl~ proposed mi~gtfion incasue will conffol any poumfial conm'bution by complyinS with existing lighting conuols, County of Riv~sld~ Ordinance #655. Thus, tbe pto~ is not fom:ast to conuibutc to 26. Natural Resources: Pottodd StVane~~f Impre: Limizing Access/Cons~amage to Natural Resource Values The nannl gJom~s issues ate d~,k'd in blnitisl StudY, Chapter8, SectionS.l, oft~e EZR. The ~Oj}O3~ project is Dot forecast to limit 8ccess ID ))atuza] ,f. so~u.es, o31lsuolc Sigpi~c-ant p,~Ju~l in the Initial Study concluded that no potendal for si~isc-m msomce inspaN will occur if the project is developed as propoint. No mlti~.don is mluitsi. " Faro in Support of the FireSinS_ The di.~Cs-~iOn Of the Ilal!ltal .s.~oluces isslles is provided in the gltvifot-.,t real CVahla~OD SeCtion Of the Initial Study fl~ges 29 and 30, imm9.a-b). The amlysis ialicales that the ptoject is not tstemst to damage anY agriculnttal resorttee values; that no mineral tesmn~ values of significance are iocaied wid, ln the project area to which access could be thnited; and adequate mineral tuou.cu ate ~y available m meet project d,.mnnd The proposed project is not forecast to ~,_,~ a sigpific-m hnpact to the pnm,'ti ~ of cozen for this project. Thus.,; the project cannot contribute additional significant natural tesmLn:es impac8 to the tunrelative value or demand for such facts, the City concludes that potential natural tesoux'ces impacts eom implemt-nting the pt'oposed project will be aoasigaificam without aay mitigation or oth~ ~ to the ptoje~'t. 27. Risk of Upset: Potential Release ~f Hazardous Materials/Interference w~th Emergvwy Response Plans Potentlad S'~nineant Im~aa: The propo~ projea could c~se siS~ifi:~ a~ne ~ m the envixonment or to hmans by c~m~ng the risk of an explosion. accidemi teeuse of hantdom materials, or ~ with exisdn_g Fmaln~_: The risk of upset issues ate diF,~x-d in b luitial Study, Chapter 8, Section 8.1, of t!~ ]~-. The proposed project is !x)t forecast ID came a siFfi~c'm polemind for explosions, for ;ccidemal teleases of ha--n~US mamrbds, or for inte-E:tcme with any idemified emergency tespome plan. By contn~5~xting to the early installation of the Western Bypass Road, the proposed ,project will be in the Initial Study concluded that existing ~ ate in prate in the City of Temecula for m~nigi~gitnpactste~am1t~risks~fupsetandthept~jecthasn~p~tntia~f~rsignifuantinctused risk impacts to occur if the project is developed as p,oposul. No mitigation is tequimi. Facts in Support of the Finding The discussion of the risk of upset issues is provided in the envkoumcnlal evaluation section of the lnitisl Study (Pages 30 and 31. item 10.a-c). The analysis indicates that the project is mt Eon~ut to ctu~ a sigpific-m incrmse in potential risk for telcase of b"~'~lous materials axi explosions, or to ~ with a~ ~ tespoasc plan. 26 aptDject. igllefiL TlluS, the prOject is!lDt fDteCaSt tO cooffib~g additiOoal sigPlRP'm POlglMhl fDt tisk Of~ 28. Population: Alteration af Future Population Otaract~ of the Area Fmmn_~: propored project is not forecast to cause a ~inmi~c-,w altention in fumze population distribution~ will be supporting mjor regiomi air q,~Hty piamdng Souls. The analysis of the population issues the d~v~OplDcot azea gild the project has Do poigodz] fix sipi~csee sltevldOn~ in pOpg]adOll Of the t~on if the ptojea is dev*~ as v,opozd. No '~m~ is xequin~. The discussion of the population issues is provided in the envito~ evaluadon senion of the Initial Study (Pages 31 and32, itnn 11). The analysis hdicams that th~proposed proj~t will nmm aPomntial3,100P°mntialj°bs while adding a total of 983 new t~idents to the project area for a 3.2:1 jobs/housing ratio. The mud population increase to the region is approximamly equivalent mom year of growth, but since it will occur over a several year period, the tam of gwwth is not forecast to be significant. Thus, the pwject is not forecast to contribu~ additional significant potential for adverse population impms m the mnulative pote~_'-a f~r population growth. The jobs/housing ra~o of the pwposed project is fom:ast m 'be bemncial and consistent with regional air quality p~:,mlng goals. Based on these facts, the City concludes that pmmial population impacts fz~nn imple~,~n6~g the proposed project will be nonsigplf~,'-,- without any mitigation or other ~-h:,,ees to the project. 29. Homing: A~ea ~ng Homing or Demm~ for Homing Potential S'tgnlficant Impact: The ptolmsed project could cause slg~fi,-~,,~ advene dfms by Finding: The housing issues at~ di-~,qed in the Initial Study, Chapter 8, Section 8.1, of the ]~-. The proposed project is not fom:ast to _~,_~- a significant airration in exis~,,~ or rutore housing d.m~.,d The -nnSysis of the housing issues vt~..mcd in the Iuitial Study concluded that the project ~ cte~ provide apptoxlma~y the ~ mxmbet of ~ne units as the exis~n_~ land use desig~ons, and total demand for ftmttz ipt~in_o in the area my be reduced by the project. occur if the project is developed as ~oposed. No mitigation is t~quired. Facts in Support of the Finding The di.~-~'iOn of the hm_~_~n~ issues is provided in the nr~o~ evaluation section of the Initial Study (Pages 32and33, item 12and in the ElP, Land Use dimmssion). The ,mlysis indicams that the pmPoscd Project will allow 27 30. Transportation/Circulation: Waterborne, Rgl and Air Tram~rtation System Effects The project could alter pt~=ot w~.,bo, a;, nail and air uaflic systems to tbe 4' h :...e ^, ofexis~uyatm~ F'mdhlg: None of theas systmm will be directly ~ by l~e proposed project. No mid;on is Faro in Support of the ~ 31. Transportation/Circulation: Increased Safety Hazards Potential S~dncant Im~t: 'Fh~pmj ycauseasiFdfic~hnPactbYinct'using~~ ectm Findin_~: The potential for the project to incautse tm~ saf=ty hazards is di~cn~Ised izt the hiitial Study, Chapter 8, Section 8.1, of the EIR. The project has a potential to czeate si~i~nm tr~ hazards bdag insun~l in a~otdan~ with findings in the Tmtf= Subchnnt= of ~ae ~ (Smajon 4.6). The analysis of tbme tnffic safety issues p~ in the lnitial StudY concluded that a Pot~ for significant impacts can occur if the projm is d~vdol~i as propose! and four ua'~Sation 20. During ~on that q~ecu the local roads, the project owner shall provide ~ wa~c control resources (xignin~. protective devices, cro_~;.~ng devices, daom~, flaSpersons, etc.) w mam~ safe m~c fltm,. lf ~ within a road right4-way is not compL~__,d by the end of the day's work; rite contractor or aSency shall ensure that 28 2]. The di.~c-tslon of the taa,.Vo,~ safety impacts is pmvidai in the envirou, a.aal eva~mion section of the Initial- Study (Pages 35 and 36. lean 13.f). The analysis indiCateS that the project will chafe lxxmntial traffic safety h---rdS during cornins=ion that my be siLml~c~t unieu mlt~,d. Mi~l~OD ugi~mU dP21-23 for traf~ $af~J will comzol saf~y bem~iS to the point of reducing or eli,,.ir~';,![ ~ pOllStill !mixds. Thus, the project is not x~omibRity of the City to monitor and it will be impL nv.~ d by the City as pan of its wview and aM}zoval g2. Public Services: Hre and Police Potential Signi~em Impact: The project may came an hnme in demand for f, re aud Police services which could exceed the capacity of tl~ systems in place. Findin_a: The poemflat for adversely im.naCdn~ rite and poficc service systems is di..,c..,~-d in tize Initial Study, Chapter 8. Seaion 8.1, of the E/P. The project has a pO--,d,t to czea~ sig~in--m service issues presentai in the Initial Study concluded tb~ a potential for signi~cam impacts can occur if the project is developed as pwpmcd and tlucc midgadon incasins will bc imple, m-~ed to be implem,~ed: Western By-pass w ensure du= dur ware' dim'ib~ordrransmission line, ~f necessary for .fire protection purposes, ~s insmaed when the road is coruvucud. To zedu~ wildland fn~ h~nrdS below a sipi~c~n* level along time Wcsunn By-pass Road fig fortowing mitigation mas'u~ slaIi be imple~*m,.d: 26. A/oag the wag and egut ~ of ~ Wattrn By-pass Road a fire and yeScraYon managemint p/an shah be prepared and s~bmased to the C/ty, RCFD, and CDF for review and approval. This plan shall provide a ~dent buffer of~re ~ plaraings 29 27. br,/atb~ re/ated uzl~c camel and 12 ofii~etsduringea~taiummmivilies. Tacandys~s hdica~tbattbepmjegtwi~. Midgadonmusutes of~Ci~mm~~~~l~~Ci~ofi~~~~~ 3~. P~c ~a: ~, M~~e, M~ ~ ~ Se~c~ p~. Fm~: ~ ~ m ~y ~ ~e ~ ~bfic ~ ~ ~ di~ ~ ~ ~ S~y, ~8, ~8.1, of~. ~~of~j~~onm~~~ Facts in Support of tht Fhain~_ danand on the schools, ~ m, lm-,,~, matical and h'brax~ services. l~fidSadon fees f~r ~ effects on schools, in~ m,ln,em~,.e, and fibrazies ensure that the project cannot came an indirect signi~cm effect you-go basis. Because this set,Ace is provided thro~h private systems, it can expand to meet any inctused demand. Thus, the project is not forecast to contributc addidonal significant potgndal for advase pubtic sayice 3O Cimptff8, Secdma8.1, ofdae BlR. Tnc amlysis ofdte pt~in tdiion to tb~ais~ availability of m~rSy ,~so-.ce.s, euffSy service syssmss, snd ~ project desm~ issues Facts in Support of the Find~ The r~-~on d these public service system issues is provided in the essvlm-,- -,~ evaluation section of the Initial' Study (Pages 40 and 41, items 15.a-b). The analysis indicam that the p~opomi project will Bet comume large quantifies of eazrgy and is not forecast to have a significant adverse effect on the eaisting eazrgy ista.mxucu~ ~, as long as sdequ~ msoumes axe available as fom:~ time sysms can S m meet any izzessed or to the c~auladve po~Entisl for such demand. Bssed on shese facis, the City COBCI~_,~__ tlsat paCea~al merSy chsne~ to the project. 3~. Utilities: Adequacy of Capacity and Service Pattern Potential Significant Impact: The project my. cause an immc in deutmt for utility services which could eL_,~__ the capacity of the ,~ilty system in place. Finding: The po~-n~al for advet~y impac~ng utility ~ and the ~iel._~ service paten h ~ ~ S~y. ~ 8. ~ 8.1. of ~ ~ ~ a~l~ of ~ No ~dNon h ~* Facts in Support of the Fmdin~ The discussion of the utility system impacts is p~i~ in the cnv~ evahmtlon section of the Initial Study (Pa~ 42 aad 4~. i2ms 16.a-g). The ,naysis indicates that the proposed project demaaauds for each ,dairy system (power sod mmml ~a.s; comm,mlcadons; ~ smiary sewer,, stozm 'water draimiF; mud waste disposal) ~!l_e widdn the projec~d capacity of these systems for the City of Temecula. Dema~ for ,dHty capacity is ~ w inctea~ within the overall pwject area, but. not beyond existing system cmpa~ideS. No utamual ia:tease in m. lllty d~,~,ut ot aisjoiami -.Hty patterns ~1 be c~_,,'~ because the vi~ne udlifies axe genmlly in pla~ and adequ~ to serve the ire. The n-tlcip~t~.,l d~,,,=~ on ~ were dete~i~ m be withl. the exis~ or platreed se=vi~ demand for signifu:ant .~lity ~ re~ut~. Based on the~ facts, the City wzludes amt potmid utility system and utility di.m'ibution patte~ effects fxom implem,.n. ng the pmpo~ project will be nonsignificant without my mitigation or other ,-hnng to the project. 31 ~6. Health Risi~: Crtarion or Exposure m Health Hazards FsctsinSupportoftJmFmdb[ Tbediscussionofthelmaltblmatd~ispmvidedintbeenv;'o ..... ,-nevalumiousmionof~S~y (Page 44, imm 17.a-b). '1'no amdysis indicau~ am ihe proposed project uses have mpoemdai m cr~- any bulth Wi~ be DO~figllifi~lBt ~ ~ mi~ip~OD O[ Oth~ Cha!l~$ [0 the p~ject. 37. Recreation: EUmination of Recreation Resources a_re CODSi{:[~I~ ~1)0,~,"t 10 the O. ...... mdty. The potesltild to ellmi,~ exisdllg ~ t~SOmceS iS di*~C-~ed in tile Tnitial SDldy, Chapter 8, SectionS. I, ofthe EIR. The analysis ofthe existing xectudonal msounz iuum Pttmm~in can occur because no such tuoutces ate Iocami within the project n ff the project is developed as proposed. No mitigadon is nquired. I +* Facts in Support of the ~ The discussion of the tt-t~__donal tesm:~ issues is provided in the envitomutmal evaluation section of the Initial Study (Page46, items 19). The analysis imHtatm ast the ptoposed pmject impact amas do not connin any existing the project is not forecast to, conlziime to dixeet or emmtlative si~ineen~ recreational resource intpacts. Based on D.2. Non-SbsiQ,-ad Tm!~,"~ Idmified in the ~ After Mine.on fonowin~ ~on each resource iutg is ide,~d~,-d; it is fortowed by a descxipt~ of the potnfial sigHSmut adverse enviloradtaml eff~t (Poential Sig~cant Impact); a di-~tqsedOn Of the fiDdiDgS in the ellthe adm~iS~radve midgation measm, u that will be implemenml to achieve a mm-signi~cm impact aze i~enfi~ed: and Dnally, a 32 'The City Council of the City of Temm:zda (City Council) hereby finds that all mHprlon n,caamts tbat will be aveid erie sipi~c.,,-- envi,.o.=.,' .dd eftm meteor as ide~ed in the c:anpie~ b. 5uc~changmor'brr~''mm'~d'i"tbex'mp°mibility~dj'risdledtm°fanmt~publicmgency c. Specific e~iomjc, social o~ otb~ ~OneHfm~jOn~ mab ink,,,'ble ti~ mitigation me~m'es or The City Council bffeby finds, peaflare= to Public Rgsmm:es Section 21081, tlnat t!3c following issues aze non- significant based on in~,lemenf2riOn Of thP_ mitigation incisors oildined below add Illat DO addidollal mitigation mcasm~ or project c~,-,,,~cs at~ required to reduce these impacts below a sig,,dfi,--m level. These issues and tbc measu~ adopted to midgate thnn to a level of insigpi~,--,,,'c arc as fonows: 2. Air Resources: Con,rlrucfion Emissions Consmxcdon ~mi-,~ions from gr~din~ paving and conmucdon activities Potential Significant lmmu:t: - -' ' could cx__,~__ zggional thgsholds sad contribute to comlnned -~igpiflc"'m xmouges evalusdon indicated ass project commacdoa missions fo~ carbon ~ (CO), mcdve orStalc ~ ~OC), rodfur oxides (SO,) and panicu~ ms~ (PMs) w~ found separately under Section E below. The only impac~ wire polgndal sig~i~e"~,,'e is ~ fugidve measul~s 4.2..~.1 priorwissuanceofagradingpermit, theprojectpropnmushalldmwuvatewthe City lhal ~ be no dusr impacu ~w ~aeu w cnuse a nuisance, and SCAO, MZ) Rule moistening soil prior to grinaug, daily wattring of txpostd surfaces or trtating w~h soil conditioner w stabilize the soiL' washing truck tires and wvering loads of ttiff transported 33 4.2.3.2 All comtnwtim eq~meu willbe ~ in peak opautin8 condia'on so as to reduce ~ eminims. 4.2.3.3 Eeaipmmt shall me knv-su#~ ~i~d J~L 4.2.3.5 Trucks and colon equipmmff will limit idling. Trucks and equipment that may be l~ft to idle for more than 15 mbm~s a~a~ be slutt dowr~ 4.2.3.6 reslricted to off-peak hours (i.e., baween 7..OO p.m. and 6.~0 a.v~ and between IO.~O a.m. and 3.~O p.m.). 4.2.3.7 Constr~__~_'onemploya~beprov~dmdwilhvuns~iqformationw~Ithecontractorsj~all submit and implement an approved ride slmre program for constallion employees. 4.2.3.8 Pre-coated and pre-cdored materiais will be used in amsmwtion to the ett~t fazsible. 4.2.3.9 Prior w issuin~ a building permit, the ~ty war require doa~euaa~n from tae appti . .cOnt that pwper precautions Mve been micen so that workers are not trposed w uasafe levels Facts in Support of Fmding The discussion in the text of the EIR and support docmnents indicates that the project will emit less CO, ROC, SO= and PMm ti-~. the thresholds of significance established by SCAQMD for a project in the South Coast Air Basin. Table's 4.2-3 and 4.2-6 in the lrmal EIR list the forecast emissions and none of ttz above emissions apptoach~ the SCAQMD signific~e thresholds. The EIR concludes that the ptojea and cumulative impact of these air emissions are forecast to be 13on~g~i~c~nt, bill mleiglldO!l iS proYide~ [o COltO] mill mi-eeiOllS a!ld ~ for ~ frolit fugitive dusL Based on these dma, tt~ City concludes tb~ the pot~sitl consuuction -mltelOn impacts ftnm CO, ROC, SO=, and PMto can be m,lmlm, d at a non-sig~i~c~m level or caa be x~duced below a significant level in project are the zespo~ibility of the City and these mca.NaY=s will be implememwN by the City as part of its review 2. Air Resources: Operation Emissions (Pha.~ I) Finding_: Operation emissiom from en~b~-~ent facility operaiota mi tu~ra~o, adon emlg~ions ofpano~ acce~g the azeminme~ facilities could exceed r~,ional thresholds and contribute m continued si~fic~m Theopendomlairqualityismmm~,fi~c-qedindmilinC!,~qRer4oftheEIR. Theair resOux~S evaluation indit-~u~l that project ~ ~i~o~s for pax~i~,lau~ ~ (PMm) at the end of Phase I we~ found to be below the thth~hoid of si~ficonee esmblished by the ~CAQMD without specific midradom The potential operating emission impacts sr~ not considered 4,2.3.10 4.2.3.12 4.2.3.13 4.2.3.14 Hotel and mm,minmaa ~ tmploya~ si~al bt providat ~ transit irrform~oa and the applimra sima subrait and implyhum art approval ri~ slume program .for pttmanmt ~playm. ... 4.2.3.15 2he applicant or City shall purchase clean fuel trams for transporting p~ople from parking areas to the mm, rainm~ faciliaes. 4.2.3.16 Provide preferential parking for car azut van pooB for employea. Facts in Support of Finan_a Thediscussi~ninthetext~ftheBIRandsupp~nd~amae~tsi~icatest~tthept~j~ctwi~emitle~sPMm~ thresholds of signitica~e estabBgzd by $CAQMD for a ptoj~t in the Soutit Co~ Ak Basin after ~ I is implemem~l. Tables 4.2-8 and 4.2-8 in the Final FIR list the fotet~ nni-~ons and the panical~ maugr emi~ons do not aMmmcb the SCAQMD sigpific-,,,-c tineshold. Tig ER concludes tim the project and c~md-rlve impact on patticalm maugr pollution m fomm't m be nomigHfl,'-m afmr compledon of Phase I, but mitigation aniSSioD im,naCts fZODl P19[so Call be m~invalned at a DO!l-SigllifiCa!lt level or Call be ~ below a $ig~ifir-ant level in accordance with implantriling rig mitigation mcamn~ proposal for lids issue. The zccommeadrd changes in the project aze the responsibllity of the City and these measuzes will be implemcmed by the City as part of its 3. Air Resources: Operation Emissions Potential SL.,dm..., lmput: Opmdon emiqiom fzom emminmm facility operadons and mmspona~on emism'om oflmtom rA'eS~ing fig e. atr~~ facilidgs could exceed mgioml tlu-esboids and conre'bum m comimgd ~i_mi~c-nt air qmlity 35 end of P!mse H w~e fumsd to be below Ihe threshold of si~nifi--,~e esmblish~ by th~ SCAQMI) 4.2.3.12 4.2.3.13 4.2.3.14 4.2.3.1.~ 4.2.3.16 Provide inc~nriva for tour butu and once tour buses have dropped off patrons, these buses shall not be allowed to idle more tlum five minutes before they are on sat or arrangemags can be made with an offs~ profasional day-care providtrfs) w mat the day-care nauts of up to 2,4OO employees. .... Hotel and entertainment facility employees shall be provided with transit program for permanent employees. The applicant or City shall purchase clean full trams for transporting people Provia prelermaat parUng for car and van pools for employees. Facts in Support of Fmdln_q The discussion in rig mxt Of the BIR and support documents italicares ant the projea will emit less Plulm than the ~xt~olds of sipiflc-,~e establisimd by $C, AQMD for a project in rig ~ Coast Air Basin afar Phase H is imple,~af~!. Tables 4.2-5 ml 4.2-9 in the Fiml EIR list the fm~ast emi.~icag and rig paniatlm matmr emissions do not apptm~ the SCAQMD signifi~,,~e ~ld. Tlg EIR concludes timt rig pmjea tad .cu~xdafive impact on paxziculat= maU=r pollution ax~ ~ m be nonsignificant, but nn'tigation is provided to control total emissions. Based on these dam, th~CitYconcludestbatthePoznxial~nnlanissi°nimpactsft°mPMm can be m~.int~ia-d at a non-significam level or can be reduced below a significant level afk-r completion of Phase II in project ate the ruponsibility of the City and these nzasu~s will be implem~-d by the City as part of its x~-view 4. Air Resources: Carbon Monoxide 'Hot Spots 36 Potential Rgptfie-~, Imlma: ~'- Opentionemi~omftomtmffgtelm~totmw. itotheentmaimsmm fagili6m could razed the CO mbim air quality mud~ conttiimm to io~ally si~fie-m air quality dea, mltigleiO!l measures ate tequized 1o be ~m~lemme~, CO 'hot spots' ate forecast to be ,e, uagnme.,,r and no mifiption is mluixed~ ~ on these daut, the City concludes that the potential opemional emission impacts to CO ambient air quality can be n, ol,t-i,,~d at a non- significant ~ without implemm~riag mifig~im mess/H~. 5. Air Resources: Taxics Emissions oftoff: mauiais fxx}m pmjea oixamions could uceed risk thresholds and contribum to siplfic~nt local aiz quality degrulatj'on (toxic hotspots). The toxic air poD-mat issues ag aisc,,ned in detail in Chapter 4 of the EIR and Appendix 1 of Volume 2, Technical Appendices. The evaluation of potential toxic emissions focused missiota fixan mani,,meat, hotel, commenill and tesidemial uses that the proposed Foject would allow to be implemenmd if apptoved. Timproject does not potmial souges ofsig~fi~caut am~m~ ofmic -,,i~ons and existing toxic -,,i~i,m tegulmiom emute that toxic emissions will not cause a locally signi~ca~ advex~ air quality i,mpK't. T~mm, toxic emissions ate not considmd sipl~c-m f~nr fig Fopos~ Foj~'L No mifigmioa or to the proj~'t az= taluiml. Facts in Support of Finding pubtic !ga.!ffi risk. The EIR concludes that the project and cumulative imlmct of tlgse ak ,.ni.eeiom has no lxaemial to be significant, and no nfi~ption or changes in the project ate xequited to achieve this w.,-ignlti,~ iratact. Based on these d,w, the City coxr. ludes that the potential toxic ~nk-~iom impacts from funn~ project uses and Lt-tivi~eS ~ be nai~mim.d ~t a llml~glfi~C~lt level withOtlt a.ay mitigltioR ot eh~n_ee~ in the ptopose, d project. 6. Air Resources: Odors Poremid Siv/~kut Imlma: Opention emissions from ent~tahuam facility opentim at the W'rid West Arena could generate odon fxtnn ~ compounds that could adversely impact nearby resiclene~ 37 4.2.3.17 7. Air Resources: Cumulative Openaaon Emissions Potential Significant Iraliner: Cammt'mrlve long*tcnu emissions r. um Op:~'ndne ~ f:ac*ilid~ and nips to these ides could ex__,:,.2ed_ regional thz~lds and comzibum to CO-,_d,,-,.d significant air quality degndadon. F*m~: within the South Coast Ai~ Basin will not contribut~ to significant air quality degr~on because the 5CAQMD Air Quality Mamgemea Plan (AQMP) will control emissions by the year 2010 to impacts ax~ not conddeted cumula~vely significant because of the impiem~don of the AQMP by the DisUicL No additional mitigation mnsuxes ate wquited of the project to achieve this level Facts in Support of Rnding below a significant levd in accordance with ;,,,pl~-,- m;ng the AQMP. The cixanges in rggioml emk'sio~ at~ the agencies as pan of their wview and appmral attbodty over emissions soun~ and activities. 38 Biological Resources: Consuuction Anivides ' T"~ comu~on ~ .t~ a wit le Wereside Specifi~ Plan The biololic~l ~ issum ~e ~-t~a~d in ~ in ~ 4 of tl~ EIR. T!~ biolol~l mocca~. Commu:~oncqdlvmrs,dtcr&act' - - to atns not mquixed for dcvelopmnat may cause sigllific21t ~ of lipllillt hlbitlt or 'w~. ~ i!liplCt I tic ftdly mlriglfpd to a m)miFd~,'em level by inm~!ling tm~icas lO easute w'~defeel loss of habitat does not occur during conm~ction. The potntiaJ for mountain lion miSf~o" impacts ate very low, but mitiSsdon is= fur ttic W~[l'!l By~ Rxid bridge {}vet M~ti~l {~ ~ mi~tmiOn u/.ia~t(..~ bIV~ ~ siF, mc~m These m--.,m axe: ~ and mar~ comvuc~on area bomufar~ and ~haU rem~n a quaUft~ bt'ologbt w~t atahorZty to flop com'trucrZon activity when ~t conm'ucr~ tw, end~ beyond thue 4.3.3.2 Conffruc~on acr~v~ at the W~T~rn Bypa~ croff~ng over blur~ffa Crtei~ SIu~Z be 4.3.3.3 Cons~'uc~n flagSrig arm~ and accews routty 3haH avofd ~ert~the wildlO'e armft. Facts in Support of Finding The discussion in the w, xt of the EIR and support doc-me~*~ (Volmne H, Technical Appendices I.A t!ffough I.C, of the EIR) indicates that the project will emit less PMm ,hart the thresholds of significance ~tablished by SCAQRD for a project in the South Coast Ai~ Basin. Some loss of plant productivity flzmm fugitive dust deposition result from such deposition, but this impact will be short-term and is mtmatly elimiw~,ed after the first rainfall following completion of conat~uc~on. No signifita~ loss of plant babitat is forest to occur fxmn implem-nm*ion of the project as proposed. CTradin~ activities in the Wm Specific Plan area could came additional lOSS Of habitat (wetlnnd-~), but thim Call bC coiltro!l~d by im,nlllng te. mlX)zu y flescin2 in active cotlstns~on m as m]uL, mJ by meam~ 4.3.~.1. The potemlnl to affect mmmmin !ion mightion along Temecatla C. teek could be sigpific*n** but is fully mitigamd by Ibniri~ conmuction on the Wenm Bypass baidge to daylight houn as tequigd by biological tcsom*ces can be mmimlna, d It I i!~gDiRCallt ~ Of CIII b~ tedllced b~ a ~i~ifle.ant 1~ in 39 9. BioloS~,al Resources: Loa~ ~ ,. loss of Bahira · m l~opo~ ~ my ~use · ~Vd~,'--t loss of irahim fiat mlVons listsi animal qg~s, eitlzr ial~tly ch~ to uzt~m mivides, ordim:tiy fzam~ofmtmllabitatmuzbanuses. 4.3.3.4 ,4U consnuaZoa deW~, aud~ m yood Uger, waZ be re, wved pom th,r ~ite eaca day. .~U 4.3.3.6 To prevent the loss of any Southwe. gem Pond Turtles during construction, the applicant shall rain a quaked biologist to collect ar~ turtles within the Western Byluas: bridge crossing consttucaon area. The biologist shall also omrsee insinuation of barriers to premnt turtles from ocmpy~ the construction area dut~ acli~e construction in the 4.3.3.7 7o offset the loss of 64. 6 acres of occupied C, naa:agd~ habitat in the Ckaraise Osalxzrmi and ~ ,Sage Scrub plant conuma~e$ within the project area the applicant shall implement one of thefollowing measures: a) Acquire 97 acres ofhigh quality Cmatr. awJaer habitat (1.`5:1 ratio based on discussions with U. S. Fish and IRldlife Surff) and ~ mme~hip of the land or open space easemenu (which prevent any future use odurr than open space) and management respomibilizy for the property to the R~ County Parks Departmen or other agent acupmble w the U. ~. Fish and IR!dlOee ~ervice and Platmu/&mazz Margarita River Poteuial Reserve men as idmnfu~ within the Riverside County °Mulrt~le ~t~cies ltabimt Conservation Plan °, or at a location acuptable to the U. ,~. Fish and lRMlife Xtn&z and Dtparmsmt of Fish and Game. An endovanent of $,50,000 shall be provided for me by the desipated mmmgenmt agewy to enhance wiMlife carrying capadty of the ~7 acres set aside as miu'gation for this project,' or b) pay fees as determined through negotiations vath the U. ~. Fish and W~ldlife ,Serdce and State Department of Fish and Came to an agent authorized by these two agencies for purchase and Game 1601/1603 agreemint. Zlw plans for the two acres af ~~land .d~.~,.z AdZ b~ r,~ia~ ..d ~mMd by d~ Ci~. u. s. Fish and mM~ ~rv~ce, 4.3.3.~ A Hit fence or alternative otx'4,psr~lt ta tiw 01~ and ~an Diego ReBional Wafer Qm~lily 4.3.3.10 The applicant st~ll install fencer or adwr m~_.. qu~s w cantrol iuanan access from dw Wawm B~pa~ to dw war, actpt in Area D ~/ dw W~tside 8ped~c 4.s.s.H 2'he city war ~pose a ~ af agrovl rattans ownersni~ of domesac dogs and _,',,- when approvals are grantact for fttture residential developmeu widtin Areas C mut D af the Watside ~ Plan. 2'ne restriaion shatl appty to all dmntzic dogs and cats and sludl allow omswrship of such animals only 4.3.3.12 Due applimnt shall pay any additional 5KR fe~s, if required, for developing the Faro in S~ppon of Fmd~ The disaussion in rig u:xt of rig HR and support do~una~ (Volun~ IL T~mx~al Appe~cm LA thro-~ I.C, of the EIR) ladicarus that the project has the pommial to elimi~u. signifaam habitat tr~ombe, s and pine long-man hx:ompatibilitybm~e~nuztmxtmmandadjg=ntlmbitat- Appmxhna~y49.3ac~ofctmtalgsta'ub, 15.3m of cMmise dmparral. ml 1 kow of tipariaa habitat will ~ e,~im-ed if th= ptoj,~ ia ix~ie~v~rd as pmpm~. The sage scrub and chapatnl habitats support a known population of ~ lp"f~tc"e~ F. xusin miti~a~rm isptoposedtocompe..nsamfortl21omofd~i"habitat- Ufcaninenngptlbilityisptimatilydu~to~ofP~s that f~ghllHx or irill ~ Wi~, add mi~g~iOll i~ ge~]~ to ·llmlrmw the: po~ for ~ typ~ of incompatibility. The EXR concludes that the project and cunmlative biological tmoun:e in~pacts dz to project implementation ate forecast to be nom'igpifi~m aft~ implem-mlng proposed mitigation. Based on these data, the City concludes that th~ pomntial project impacts on biological tesotttces can be reduced below a significant level the project aze the mponsibi~ty of the City and these measures will be implemenmd by the City as put of its 10. Noise: Traffic NoBe rotsr~ SW, mm~t Tinfig aoise from vehicles teceeeiae eme, mlma,v~ fgilities could cause raise levels to exceed City sipl~,~,."e thrcsholcls at uljacem ttsid-.aces. 41 Facts In Support of nnams envittmment m be a significant ixnpact. Th~ in.~n~ion of a noise wail, or comparable buff~z, will ~ th~ increase in noise by 1-5 dB which is ~d~i~q~t tO t~iuce this ixntm:t below a sigpffi,'~nt level along th~ Wes~zn thx~hold at the n~ax~t t~qjdem-e~ or t~iuc~d to such levels ~ idemln-d mitigation. Based on these d~m~-~ City concludes that the pok-ntial project impacts due to tn~c noise can be tzduced below a significant level in project ax~ the tmponsib'dity of the City and these measures will be implemented by the City as pan of its review and approval authority and dining mitigation monitoring. 11. Noise: Facility Operation Noise Potential ~ignffieant Impact: Facility operation noise fzotn entn~imx~r activities could cause noise levels w exceed City signi~snce thzesholds at adjacent the W'dd Wmt Arena in the Wesmid~ Specific Plan =m. Mitigation is provided to ~ tlmme potmial noise impacts to a nonsignificant level for s~nsitive ,ccepto-s. Six mitiSation uzasm'es have been idemlsed in the E~R that change the proj~c:t to en~n'e that the above ',m~acts ~ not 4.4.4.5 The City sitall establish a noise complaint program wire consmwaon of facilities in Old Town begins. 23~is program shall include a point of cop__-,_,.t, a log of all 42 4.4.4.6 The City shall require tpecial riolee attenam~n mmsm~., ~ as ttmporary or pernsamnt ~ ~ or ~ ~ o~. to amtrot aterior crowd noise to 4.4.4.7 4.4.4.9 L,t at the nearest tetOw noise r~o~tor. shall adnnit a noise study dt~mmatln8 that noise levels from the compl~ can be some or all of the following ramsure wi~ich have b~s idm~ed to reduce Arena noise to the 62. T dB le~ at residetwes ~ P~ol Strea. rear of the Arma to 60 dB according to WJflW. The house sound systtm should be designed w minimize environmmml noise. A distribu~ lo. dspmker approach for :~mtor seating areas :hould be utilized The Arena 'tent' should be constructed of material which has a weight of.75- 1.0 lbs/ft2. The rear side of and 'bleacher style' seating should be enclosed to provide a barrier around the facility to help control noise. Mixing console noise ~ during ~otu:er~ must be ratriaed to 100-105 dB maxinmm. 4.4.4.10 The City shall require any future residential uses atljacatt to the Western Bypass Road tha: p .ia~e raidaca within the ~ Db CYEL noise contour to install sound atteatation barriers or walls mtfu:imt to reduce noise to a level below this si~ threshold. 4.4.4.11 Fins in Support of Fmd~ Th~discus~i~i~thet~xt~fth~IRmisupp~nd~m~i~dica~tsthatthep~jectwill~sultinf~ci~ity~pemti~ noise levels at adjacent nsidences to exceed noiae signi~c-,,ee ttwu~lds. Noise of pattom outside of facilities may exceed 65 c!B L.q and mitigatio~ i~ ~ m control sound l~v~ls m this level at 50 f~t from the facility. Entertaimnent noise levels ax~ fotu:ast to ex__,:e~__ the tttr~___old outside of structures with riomini su'ucmzal 43 below tie c~3~'bi!~ as,., 'z~ld at the mmx~ Based on these dma, tbe~Atycowtmysdmttbepomablpfojectiqa:mductofacilitYoFmti°nn°isecanbe reijucedbelowa~Fdt;eentk. veibl~fi:o~daacewidtlmp} -' Jdlemitipdoumc&s~v. Spfoposcdfa:ff'tbisiasuc- by CityaspmofimxvvicwandF a dudnSmb4_*"4wmodninS-' POteilt~ S]B~sCJisa ]Blplet: The F'mding: The land use issues are discmsed in detail in ChaPtff 4 of dac ]~/R. Tbcwaluafionofthcland hnd use conflicts wifix pgopos~ mid""""""""'~On for other env~omucdtiJ issues, but could cause significant impact by ev....;,'~n8 · fun~ re:marion facility near the inu-~,~c, zon of Pujol Street 4.J.3.1 The C~ty shall rmfuire a modOVa~on in the text of the Wes~ide Speci~c Plan (WSP) that requires the inctmion of a neiShborhood park/rwmrional facility in the high ttmyity res~m~ de~gmzed Zand oz fhe .future buer~ecu'~ of Pu/ol Sfree and fhe Western Facts in Support of Finding ThediscussioninthetextoftbeEIRandmPPondoc'nv"'~~iatthcPmjcawillcbaugclandm~*~" tttc Westside Specific Plan azea, but is whony co~,,v- with the uses in tte Old Town core area. The proposed land uses desiSadom (SEC, CCTS, HI)R, MU and OS) axe comlr~blc with the caisdng land use (l~-I, BP, OS, MDP,, and I-IDR) and my imvc tess impact on adjaceat uses tban the proposed project. 'Ibc as part of thc WeSside Specifg Pian or as paxt of the HDR uses under tbc Pbm- ThcElconcludesttmdzprojea 13. Traffic: Phase I Operations Potential Slsdflmnt lmpm: h~urandSatu~daymidd~ype~kb~ur-~~~~di~gt~t~edmpt~videdi~tb~Tmf~cSmdyandC~qx~r4~fthe]K~R. midgmdon mcaamca lbmd daovL' Wid, mi,q---------------~dtmemlnjec:Uafachnlmcncanbemduccdsonouafac~owis forecast to experience d~dfi,~n, da~iondon (sec Table 4.6-7). Based on theae dma, the City concludes tlaat the iX)_',q~.l 1XOje~ ~ ~ (0~ 1~ = be ~ bekrw a ~i~pi~C~nt ]eV~ in ~ with hnple,,m-ndng the City ami lhese mca~ues will be implemme'd by the City as Pm of its rcview and aPProval ~ ~ ~ miu'muion monito~. 14. Tra~c: BuiM Out W'ula-Project Tnepmjectandbuildouttm~acimlaectisusazedi,~e,mmmedindeudlinChal~r4ofdaeF,~and the Traffac Study contained in Volmne2, Tecludcal Appe,~ces, of the EIR. Tbe discussion of indint~d dat tile combiued traffic could cause ~gpi~-m deterioration of Izaffic flow at 'four imx. rsecdom. The potential tmifc flow impact ,e these inO.tgc~ions can be mitig~at)~C] by implementing specific cimdadon systgua hpmvsnem beEage the ladld out of dae project is completed. Three mitigation measures bare been ideeH~ in the ]KIP, that e~n~ the project sotbatpotendaitrafficfiowimpactsarereducaitoaqomdggif~nflevcL These measures are: 4.6.4.5 The City shall require fair-share fundin8 as described in the ConSaaon ManaSement Plan Tn~c Impact Analysis for ~ sdect~ improvement at ate Ran~ CaliforniaRoad/l-15 8mahbomdramps. Thisfundin8 canbeprovided construct a ne~ somt:bound off-rmnp at 5ariaago Road. 4.6.4.6 The City sluall reluire fair-.vimre funding as desoibed in the ConSesrion Management Plan Trq~ Irapact analysis for the s~ improvemint at t~ at $R 79 ~ and the 1-1.5 No~ ramps. This fundinS, can be provided v~n annml mr~c surveys indicate a -m~d- for tlm rood imProvemmts. The proposed .~tr,.smmt District 1.59 improvtmmts shall be modifial to include ~ah. It wm also reco,.~,..a~ed that the ulamate inttrdmge hVrmnanmt plans include a provOitm for three eastbound through iana at tke inttnecatm. 4.6.4.7 46 Toeptojecttraff~impacti.~ma~m~.~,~-edi~.dcmili~.C!mpa~'4of'tbeEgtamdtbeTz'afSc 4.6.4.1 4.6.4.2 to prov~ one tarough lane alerted witlt ~ (tinmarl) separate le~-mm lane at tht I-1N South on-ran~, one throuSh lane, one optional througMright-turn !ant, and one right-turn lant. In otrler to acvo~ two lanes of right- kmt, !urn, ever, priorm intentcling the mainline all-15 North. (Nott: The need prodded.) To mitigate 1996 with-project circulation syUem impacts at the Front the southbound inter~ection approach, Front Street shall cmm~__~',~ one left-turn lane and one optional le~-turn/right-tum lane. (Note: Because Front Street will (two through laru~ per direcaon plus a two-way-left-turn lane according to the City), t/as sotahbom~ approach (inten~ the Wutern Bypas~ Road) could cited in Table 4.66. 4.6.4.3 4.6.4.4 BarwnAsdmum 's tnr~c study himaria several additional road design m,,~qu'es that are recommvuttd to reduce overall tra~c impacts. These are reproduced in Appmdix 4. These recommendations shall be implemented as pan of the pwposed project at a time ~ by the CIty to prevent deeioration af u'~c .flow below LOS D. Th~ uauu of the an:ulation ~yuem compons~ addressed in the reco~ shall be assessed as part of the C~ 's annual The City shall rt~ir~ installation of transit faciliaes at cmmxlized locations within Old Town and the battYarena complet The CYtty shah wo~ wi#t regional vut~ agmae: to provide ser~ce to these locations in the future ~ such vansit service becomes areliable. Road. Facts in Support of fomust. Volume 2 of the BIR. mi Table 4.6.8 iMkag am all but tc~c im,--K.,;l:Ons e, valuSl~ fez 2010 will operate at an rtep~ble LOB with time project md befid out talfg ~ywth. Th~ fou~ inm,~cl;om will opeaxtc the ptojea are the x~ibilit7 of tl~ City ml tigm ~.a. ufes will I~ jmplememed ~ fla~ City as pau of its 15, Aesthetic/lr~ual R~sourc~s: Changes to tht lr~ual Sating ... Potential Significant Impact: The project could cause a significant adv~c Ch~m~ in Finding: The ae~J~ic/~ re~tLrC~ iSSUeS Lr~ discused in ~ in ('h,r~r 4 of the ~ and Volume 2, Appendix tl ofthe~IR. The evaluafionofthc aest~/visttal tuourcc chan~cs~bY titc proposed project iTtdiC~t~C! that pro/oct has a j to caus~ sjJJfi~cant cban~ ha the visual _se,~ wi,hi~ th~ We~side Specific Plan area. This pot~mhl aesahe~ impact is no~ considcamt project so that po~ visual ~ in the sire arc controlled to a ~ tban sj~pffic*n, level. 4. Z5.1 4.7.5.2 $1ope grading ttchniquty an the slope Jlacing l~ol ~ shall aim w blend with the aisring namre of the wpography. C, rud~ teck,aqu~ snaU mpnasize slope amtotwing incladin8 contour undulation and mriabte slopes. In addiaon~ wps and toey of slop~ shall be rounded. Hard edges and angles are to be avoided. Slopes shall be designed to smoothly blend with rvnaitang existing topography. Grading on the slope edge facing Pujol Street :hall be revegaattd or landscztpaI immediatdy upon completion of grading aa~f~, concarre~ w~ project devdopnmnt. 4.7.5.3 lrtsibloretainingwalBover eightfeetinheightshallbeavoided unless vLvualty intlgntttd into building design. 47 4. 7j.4 Utilfiies ~ be lorerod mderlrm~. FsasiaSupportofFiataS tetra due to gxadillg wi~lo~ ;u~l~-a:-~ia~$ tile mili/miO~ ~ With mitigafioli the potelgial l~t1' ~'C/visual resource l,m,aaonbemdumt io a,,m~V,ific~level. Based on thme dm, theCity con~udes that the potmtial mitigation ~ proposed for this issue. The K~v, ..... ~.hi~d cimge in the project is the t~omx'bility of the city and tt~s measure win be hnn~e--'~ by the City as part of its v~iew ..mi. appm~ aumo~ty and durinS 16. Cultural Resources: Archaeological Resources Constm:tion~~~~vitieshaveaPmmial mexposeand damage or destroy buffed archaeological ,cso~es which could cause the loss of signifu:z~ historic or ~ resources beneath the. O. ld Townco~ax~a. loss to such x~otu~es. The _pc~_'~ buffed resource impam are not considered si~iflco,,t aftff beco.,i,,.. a simai~cant imlmct. This measure is: 4.8.3.1 . No furtimr ardumolaSqcnl in~es~g~ B ~~ ~r~ Prvject. However, should any known or suspecmd ardmmlogical ~ be encoun2red during project dew, lopnmU, a qual~d ~smHcal archamlog~st should be amman. Woat should be Facts in S~ort of F~ms_ Thedisc~intbeteatofthe]~RaudsupPortdoc'mt'ntsindicatestbatPtojectCOlistnlCfiOlialiddevelOpllleait aaivities have apolmafial to cause damaSc or loss of significant tmried culuual re, sources tbat may exist benmh the primsrily hiStoriC in ch, n~r and a am'tigation incasic is provided m control the damage or loss of such resources 48 sccOtdsdl~ with ;...pi-'..- m|n_a ~ mlfi~sdon ~ ptot~0sa d for rid= issue. The ,kx~=-..,~,nd~.d changes in the 17. C. ultu~ Resources: Potenfiml Sly,ffs'''''* Impact: Historical Resources C.o~d~stionanddev~~hav~apem~'t toaposeaud dansale or dnttoy hisni: imltdln~ ~ amid came tl~ loss of sigpifi,,~nt himode a~aou.,'~.a within fig Old Town cot~ ~ possibk eamsakma~ stzuctuze !ocxtions sad historic b.,.dln_a were idemi6,.d for the proposed ,,za.~dtcs. Two mi~iga,ion measures have been idemlc, ed in th~ EHt that dange tlg lm~a so tbsx~histofictmildin_~x~mm:cimpst~sx~ptk'venl~fx'ombecomlngasi~fi'~mimPs~ 4.8.3.2 4.&3.3 Potential project impam ~ historic buildings. including #sse Dmt are not formally recognizaf, will be mitigated below a level of sigr4ficzmce dmssgh implmmm~on of thz provisions already contained within the OT~P OM Tram Historic Presmarioa District Ordinance. Those provisions allmqfor conditions ofapprovalfor Certificates of Historic Appropriateness. It is recommended that conditions of approml for demolition or alteration of any hixwric buildin~ include' appropriate historical and archiwctuml documentation prior to modOi~on of the building. In order to distinguish recognized historic buildings from ~ construction which usa historic architem~ elmenu, ix is recommmdal d~ historic buildings in commercial construction, and thatpromotional/int~r~ve literamre forthe project clearly distinguish hawera itismric buildings and recsu ~ Facts in Support of Fmd~tt Tnc discussion in the text of the EIR and support docmncnn indicates that project consauction and development activities at six of the possible entenzinment facility locations in the Old Town cotc area have a potential to cause damage or loss of signi~cant hism~c building tuouzc~- Thcpozntialhisuxicbu~dingtcsmuccimPctsaze forecast to be mitigable by implememi~g the City's "Old Town Hisu}fic Ptuervafion Disuict Ozdinance" and mitigation measures axe providal to control the damage or loss of such resources that could be affected by projEt gtivi~es. It my be posm'bk to totally avoid hissic buildinSs siaz tis: spa:ific lec-,io~ of ~=,taiumut facilities is still being de~ermi~, The EIR comludm that the pmj~-t and gumulati~ impm to iximaig I~dldln_a tC~XlgC~ ~'~ ~ ID ~ ligllifiC~lt withOBt ilBplmnmff~ rig mitigation ss~bslge, s. V/ith mltigllioil fll~ plx)j~K:g ~ to bimmic buiita~ -uomv.~ can im talumd so iitfi~ o~ ao loss of sudi rmoutms ~ w'aieh is c~msidm~d a caa be reduced below a sigai~cam !e~l in gcotdam~ with implem,m6ag fig mitiption mmsugs pmpos~ for this 49 This completes the discussion of those impr'~ titat are either non-significant without mitigation or that can be reduced to a nomignificant level with implementation of recommended midSation measures in the EIR. E, ~GNrFlc-ANT UNAVOmAarR ADVgR.gR IMPACTS OF TRE PROJ~.CT. I)espite incorporating changes and iterations into the Old Town Redevelopmcnt Projca (proposed project), two environmental categories wcrc found to have urmvoidablc, significant adverse environmental effects. The following environmental issues addressed in the EIR were forecast to cxperiencc siSui~cant i,mpacts: Air Quality and Noise. The potential impacls for the above issues were concluded to be significant because the impacts could not be reduced below thresholds of significance by the proposed project changes and mitigation measures (i.e., the impacts are unavoidable). Thus, the potential for si~li~cant eftcOts to occur for these issues would continuc to exist (at least for the short-term) regardless of whether or not the City or other agencies implement the project changes and mitigation measures outlined in the EIR. These two environmental issue categories, the impacts they will incur, and the mitigation measures (project changes) designed to minimize them to the degree feasible are summarized in the following discussion. " 1. Air Q~r]: Consmtaion Emissions SiSni~cant Unavoidable Impact: Short-tenn NO= cormhdcfion emissions from arc fom:ast to ca__,~__ t~ioual thresholds and contribute to significant air quality degradation. F'mding: oxides (NO~) wgrc found to be above the threshold of si~i~cance estsbiished by the South Coast Air Quality Management Disuict (SCAQMD) xcgaxdlcss of mitigation. ~, dkea missions of NO= from constmaion aaivides cannot be xeduced below a sigpifie~m k've/. The dam indicate tbat a local violation of the NO: ambient air quality standard is not at issue; NO, is a prea~sor raft ozone and the consmscdon activides wiU conffibute to contim~ significant violations of the ~tme standard over the short-tam. The EIR idemlfies mitigation nzasmes that can rgducc NO= emissions, but the volume of ~ emissions (from cousinaction eqtdpnznt) and ~ emissions (from employee trips) am substariff,! enough for this projca that rJac ~ml-~ions _~m~t be reduced below the SCAQMD threshold of significance. The six nn'figadon desigDed ~o minituliP coDstruction NOx eIDiSSIODS ID the degree feasible arc: 4.23.2 Aa amm,ua~ equiprnent will be nminmined in Pmlc oPerating am~on $o ax to reduce operational em~ons. 4.2.3.3 Equipment shall use low-~ d~eJ jiw. l. 4.2.3. 4 Electric equipment will be used to the maxinmm grteu fem'fble. 5O murkm~ m off-pelt iwur~ (i.e., hawera 7:00p. m. and 6.'OO a. m. and bawem I0.~ a.m. and 3:OO p. m.). Coast Ai~ aas~ Table's 4.2-3 through 4.2-6 jn the~-mal E~R list the fozw~-...S emi.~,io~ and in m:h case the NO. emis~m sd~s~mhHy exceed the SCAQMD dgpi~c-~e tisahold~. The ElF, co~iwles ths the project and ~ .,,,'tiption ~ fn~r ~ pcopose. d pm~ imoxponw ~ fusible ccmmixmcd wi,+,in ~ ~AQI~{D ~ Qualit7 Alt~i .... · .n, ~ and ~ Diszi. x:fs "C!~QA ~k". No mitigation measures weze i~ed in the ,4o~onzs m co.r...-~.,-~ tim need to be comdde~ at rids time mi all of finds timat the available mitigation me~m~ ax~ imufficiem to mize NO= air ~,,,a-~on impacts from project consuuction acti~du bdow a significant level. Based on these facts. the City concludes that all feasible mitigation measm~ have been identified and these measuxus will be implemena"xl by the City and SCAQMD as part of its conditiom of approval and nn'tigation maimflag program. The City cozludes tim the ptolmsed project has the pot~ri-~ to came a si~t:i,~m advene effect on the SCAB's air quality; fiat project air emissions have been substamially lesseml to the degree fmm'ble; and tim the project specific air quality impam Rmoining after implementing mitigation measures ate unavoidable and acceptable due to overridln~ consiclemtiom as mallrod at the ead of this docuamm. 2. Air Quality: Operation Emi.~io~ Signifieant Unavoidable Impact: in 2010 (bed out) for catboa momxide (CO), zeroire orpale cuu~omis (ROC), and nitzogen oxides (NOt) w~e found to be abo~ rig thzmhold of sigpific-w'e esmblish~ by the SCAQMD l~d.leSS Of mitigation ~, dire~ ellli~iolls of th~ pOihram~ fxom opel-afiot~i Iclivilieti ~ be ndumt below at si~ifit,~t level. 'rl= data india= tl~t aviola6on of the CO ~ N~ ambient air quality mmlattls is not at issue. ROC and NO. m v.e~u~o.s for ozone and the occur before the year 2010. The EIR idemi~.~ mi~igadO!l u,~i,~l~S that call tedlge ptojegt emissiom, but the volume of emissiom (primarily emn ttatc) ate subs,,.,,,i.s enough for this 51 4.2J.11 71te prejea w~ lmmU lau uuru~ ~ and bmchcr in Old Town and ~ 4.2.3.1J 4.2.3.14 4.2.~.15 Hotel and ~ fociRty empioyea shah be p~ wah rrar~ proFaro ~r ~ ~~. 4.2.3.16 Provide prefer~_~,,l parlang for mr and van pooB for t~nployets. Facts in Support of the Finding the I~-IR ~ $1tppOR docnmm~ ~ that the project will L'mit more CO, ROC Illd NO, ~ the ttgmbolds of significance established by SCAQlVID for a project in the SCAB. Table 4.2-8 and 4.2-9 in the Final I]3R lists the fomast emissions .m4 the CO, ROC and NO, ,mi*~iom substamially exceed the SCAQMD signi~c-n~c mrrdmlan. The FIR con~ludm flint fig pmj~t ol~mio~ ~ir ~mi~iom ag forgram to be sigaifima. Given the exisdnS air quality smmlaztl violations for ozone and CO and the am ,rmlamem rams of the SCAB for these po!lutms. the The miu'gafion measures for the proposal project inco, Voraz those fusible measures identified by tl~ EIR mad comainca within the SCAQMD Air Quafi~y Atniam..m Plan and the District's "CEQA Haudlxxzk'. No 2__ddi~iOnal ma'tigadon measures w~e idemifled in the ,c.~omu to co, ......n,~ that mcd to bc considcmt at this time and all of the chang to tbc project that ate proposed to reduce air emi-~sioan ate comidmd feasible. Therefore, the City finds ,ha, the available miu'gafion n~sums at= immfliciem to miuce CO, ROC and NO, air ,~mi-~-ion impam from of its conditions of approval and midy, mtlon monitoring proFaro. TI~ City a~clud=s mat the pm~ project has subs~m'hny lessened m the clegree feasible; and that the pmjca specific air quality imps~ x~-,-oi,,i.g aftff 52 6. Nobe:Co~ntaionAcavity levels idemified l,,am~ e..l..:Faat is omxi~ smi ,o !mown mifipfiOn i~ available to miucc noise levels below the City's si~fic-,,,r ttmslmids. IIz EIR ide~fi-s mitigation measm~ tim can impsas cannot be reduced below tiz th:uhold of ~i~q,inc,---e. TI~ five mifiption musu~.. 4.4.4.1 ~ City shall require all co~ equipment that generates more than SO dB to have sound attenuation d~ces (mqfflers, etc.) that mtet atrrmt standards and that are fully .f-u~onal at all ames the equipment is being operated at the construction siz 4.4.4.2 4.4.4.3 4.4.4.4 Proprietors of indivittual mterminmmt faciliats shall control crowd noise at their facility so that it does not ttcttd 65 dB at a dismce of SO fe~. Routine or lzriodic noise 4.4.4.5 The City shall emblish a noise complain~ program wire consmgtion of entertainmint ftu:aiaes in O!d Tovm beSins. ZMs proSram shall incawle a point of contact, a loS of all comptaints, and a los of how inch comptdnt is raolmL 53 Facts in Support of Finding axu. Tnisisasvm~ie,,fdmSeintbelmckgtmmdnoiseen~ito,-uuttobeasigran"'m~ Tbemigleve. ts in the Wemide Specific Plan aga axe fetecast to be i,,~--,~.d from a backs, ound of appmxima~y 57 dB CNEL be comidemt an unavoidable si~n~-m sdv~tse impset at the nes~st been identified ami these ..,,'-~-..~s will be L_;I: -~d by the City as pan of its COndl,iO~ Of spptoval and mltigpylon monitoring program. Based on these facts, the City co~iur~ that the proposed project has the potential lessened to the degree feasible by controlling comt~s,tlon activity; and that die project specific noise hnpacts l'~nnining a~ ullavoidable azld ~[e (hie to ov~ditlg c(~(b,Dfion~ as otiflhled at the ezld of this document. This concludes the discussion of all potential adverse impacts am'bumble to the implementation and operation of the Old Town Redevelopment Project. F. ~,I.T!;'.RNATIVF-q TO T!:IF. PROPOSI;~ ACTION The C_.alifornh Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires discussion of reasonable pwject"- alternatives that could feasibly attain the project's objectives (14 CCR § 15126(d)). CEQA requires that an FIR evaluate a reasonable range of alternatives to the project, or to the location of the project that: (1) offers substantial environmental advantages over the proposed project, and (2) may be feasibly accomplished in a successful manner and within a reasonable period of time considering the economic, environmental, legal, social, and technological factors involved. The basic objectives of the proposed project include the following: development of western oriented entertainment facilities to implement the Old Town Specific Plan concept; creation of an entertainment complex that will provide jobs, fulfill a regional need for high quality western- oriented entertainment; and enhance the vitality of Temecuh's Old Town core area by bringing large number of tourists, including the generation of increased tax revenue. The central purpose of the proposed project is to initiate implementation of the Old Town Specific Plan around an entertainment complex that will attract large numbers of people to the area on a continuous basis while providing high quality recreation and entertainment value to local and regional residents. The FIR considered a total of five alternatives to the proposed action. These alternatives were defined based on mandatory requirements and alternatives designed to reduce the identified significant impacts of the project: air quality and noise. Four of thesc alternatives were considered to be technically feas~le and were carried forward as possible reasonable alternatives S4 to the proposed project in the EIR. One of the alternatives was. rejected from further consideration because it does not meet project objectives, the no project alternative. The five alternatives that were subject to evaluation in the EIR with the proposed action ate: No Project/No Development Current General Plan Alternative Modified Westside Specific Plan Redevelopment Project without Hotel/Arena Relocation of Hotel/Arena to Adjacent Undeveloped Industrial Site The purpose in analyzing alternatives to a proposed project is to determine if an alternative is capable of eliminating or reducing potential significant adverse environmental effects, "even if these alternatives would impede to some degree the nrminment of the project objectives, or would be more cosfly' (State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15126(d)~)). The following disctmion pwvides the City's evaluation of each of the alternatives to the proposed project in determining whether they arc feasible alternatives to the proposed action (Slate CBQA Guidelines, Section 15126(d)) and whether an alternative can eliminate or substantially lessen significant impacts described in this document for the proposed action. 1. No Projea ..- The no-action alternative would elimin~ any implemer~on of the Old Town Redevelopmerit Project and the applicant would not construct and operate the entertainment facilities, hotel, cu.r....t,clal uses and residential uses. The adverse impam of the pwposed action idemfi~cd in the BIR would be ellmla,~d and the exisdn$ eavko~mal conditions would ~. Air quality hnpacls would be e!imiw~,ed and the sigplfiemnt constntclion noise i.mpacts wetrid also be ellrain,rated. This allzr~ativc wolxld Dot ellmipmtP the ~_i~win_v Si~Callt ixae~ hxlpact at the intcnec~om idcmi~ed in the taR. This impact would occair whether the proposed pwject is implem,mmd or not. The ~ concluded that the no-action alternative is enviwlmlnmm!iy superior tO the pxoposed pmjea and would eliminate the potntially significant air quality and noise impacts. It is not superior relative tO traffic which would capable of feasibly attaining the basic objectives of the project which wife outlined above. The goal of enipm-lng activity in Old Town and implemen"ng the Old Town Specific Plan would fpmmln nnfulfillpd '~, the City Climirmt~i fxmn fittiff detailed con~de~don because it is not capable of accomplishing the ide~sed project objectives. 2. Current General Plan Alternative An evaluation of the development of the site under the ~ Genenl plan land use designaxiom was performed tO determine whether environmental impacts could be re~__,,'~_ by impk~,m,4ng otltcr altenmtive uses where compatedwiththeptopo~pmje~t- Using the Geam-al P~nn and Development Code as gxides it was dePrm~*~! that impacts in the Old Town cote area would remain approxima~ly the stone under au al~madve developme~ schnne consistent with the Old Town SPecific Pian- Under the corte~ Genenl Plan tbe - 70 acte oPen sPace area cotrid be developed with a m~tlmum of seveli holDe~. This wottht result in gteatff vismd intrusion and loss of important habitat on the steeper portions of the ridge i_~_dln.~ to the Santa Rosa platean. 55 wOliid pmsin spl)I~y ~ MillS. ~ lO~ COsnp-n _ . - 4. Redevelopmeat Project Without Hotel/Arena the success of the project because of the evenil role these two facilities phy in the ~ complex. The rodeos. It also provides esse~ parlrin_~ te~omccs fDr the facilities in t!~ Old Town cote area and provides hotel capacity to senre the visiton to the ~ facilities. development would occur in accotdan~ with the existing General Plan which has been .shown to have a pomaial to be envixo~y inf~or to the proposed project. This alternative would e~imi~we the n~ed f~r th= Westfin Bylms Road and the Fust Street improvement. All tta~ and pattri~ would be tz~z~d m Old To~m facilities i.mpaas would r-moin sig~iS~m; the opmtionl air quality imtmas would b~ reduced, but is foteust to rimrain sig~ifinm. $hort-t~m ~ ~ in Old Town would tmain sig~iflc-nt under this allyinfirm. On balance this alternative =alminages some hnpacu devermin,'d to be notmigplnc'nt that zequire extemive mi~dOn (biological remove) but it will not ,,!imimmwp gl~ dgllifi~aIg ~ for air qllality axial for COllahuC. tiOu i!Oi~ impacts in Old Town.' It is only marginally suitor to tl~ pmpo~ project for eavito~ ~. and it may caus~ significant traffic impacts and signi~cant local CO problems. 56 facilities ide,~ed u eumial to the Irareject- Based on timme faro, tl~ City C. mu~ cOurhfl,'s tlmat d,i~ almmmive coarJudon in the EIR that dd,~ altarsdye h pmpaty ~ .... ~tl faroram tinther derailed cmt, d4rt-,ion benme this alumaadv~ camaot ftasibly meet the objectives eq~mhlidm~l fa~ IM piolx~d project. 5. Hotel/Arena Relocated to the A~acent viacant Industrial Pads . Thiss~nmdvew~u~dc~mis~fx~cs~ngth~bov~fsd~i~i~smth~vs~ss~~psds~mm~6°~ymt~m~ of zi~ Wssid~ SI~ Plsn m This sl~sUiw could mdaz grading ssl sig~ds~-~ masmsc~ioa ~tissions of NO, Ix woald slso e~imi~-~ th~ loss of ~ ~ ..,;,~n~s on tlz sdsdag sil~. I~ would no~ me~ the elimi~ted by timis altenlalive. Cizculatioll ~ wollld be ~ alOilg the Ealr. ho , midguion to a nonsignii~lm level of impact might no longer Iz feasible along this conidol. Oma balance this alternative also elimim,x's some impa~ d, te-...;oed 1D be noi~iguificaut that requite extmasive mitigation (biological resources), but it will not elimh.-,,- the si_o~i~c,m halacts fnr sir quality and for coupon uoise ~. li is ouly margixslly sulmetior m rig ptopogd project fnr mvifo-,,-' n',l purposes, and it my cause signiacam trafrac impam sad sipi~cas locsl CO probUms. This alternative is comidefed ouly margixmlly f=ssible because it would not mm the objective of cxmmxing a link between OldTown mi the hotd/Atm~- 0ubalsm:e, the tzsd~ofx~dm:ing some short-4mm ix~s:ts ccsnP~ environmeutally superior project mlstive m the proposed project. Based on these fax:l~, the City Comgil concludes that this altmmative project is cousidexed less euvitommmmlly sound than the proposed project. It is considered a m~rginaily femsible sll~ve becauseit does ns~-t most of the basic project objectives, but uot all of the project objeetives. Thetefu~, the City Council cornarts with the conclusion in the EIR that this alternative is properly ellmir~,~l flxma fur,~r dctaikd comidemIiou bei:ause thi, alumrive is not ~nmmxUy superior to ti~ ~ project. This concludes the discussion of project alternatives to the Old Town Redevelopment Project. G. PROXECT Bk'zNEm'ri$ The benefits from approviug the Old Towu Redevelopmeut Project are related to the immediate implementation of the Old Towu Specific Plan; the ecouomic benefits that the project can provide to the merchants in Old Town, the City, and the region over the long-texm; the jobs provided that will meet the needs of local resideuts; enhaneerneut of the area jobs/housing balauce in relation to regional air quality plan implementatiou; and the iufras~ improvements that will be provided at an earlier date than originally envisioued ira the General Plan. The benefits of a project are those positive values and new facilities that would not be made available to the community without the project's developmeut. As a techuical basis for the economic benefits of the projea, the City commissioned an economic study by Price Waterhouse and a copy is already a part of the project record and izorporated herein by reference. 57 The pwject beatfin outlined below were considered by the City Council in performing the balancing test wifi~ those unavoidable sianificant adverse impacts presented earlier in this document. The project represents the signif'Kant achievement of community economic development, open space and conservation, and revitalization goals. The izy bins of the City's Vision S-,--,,"", which provided a basis f~r the C, uzml Plan, arc as follows: · A balamz of t,~dem4ot, cmmS.,chi and hwJe~i,! · The COnt'en~,"~a Of retail and Imsiigss dv/e, lepegtt wir~i~ NUiilage Ce~; pedes~.- modes of navel; · A conummlty dedi~;mN! to ptesm'ing family valucs, conservation and public safety; · Addi.o,-i miviti~ and on~,*,.-:iks f~r · wide anay of interests. ages. and tifest~les; · The ptemvation and ~!,.~-...~ n, of histrait and mltutai · Capi~onthecc- ....... n;ty'sgmatestasset, itspeople, byencmsmSingcemm, mityinvolv=nent The project accompUsh= many of tb=e SeaLs and is a major oppommity for the City to ~-~;,, a heai~hy economy by providing additional jobs. by petty ptot__~n.- open space and annual areas at the urban edge, providing needed public infxasu'twnnc, and by ptOVjdln_~ a catalyst for e~hmn4ng Illid t~-Vimli~in~ all impoz13nt hisu~c ~ within the COmmunity. Fulfills the primary goal and purpose of the Old Town Specific Plan Accouling m the Overall (primary) Goal of the Old Town Specific Plan, the ~ of tlme Plan is m respecu~ of iss historic bufialn-s and m3ifyin8 desiSn thune mi pmvi~Li~ an economically viable seui~ for a mixraze of local and to~ serving _COmmercial uses, a4miniS~fivc/Pmfessiouai and z~-sldemi.! uses The ~ddifioml entn~imm.~. mtaiX, and tzs,~,-~nt tp,~4m-me~ proposed for the cote of Old Town will help create an attnctive and dynamic Old Town corn; the project will mtuitc all new buildin~ to comply with the design guidelines in the Old Town Specific Plan and complement the exivl-~ historic bu~d. ln_mz; alid finatly, the pwposed project will azate an economically viable local and tourist oriented co ......c~cial area that will address the blight in Old Town and reverse the ttnld towards d~tetiomtion of the Old Town area. This project is the type of mvimli~,ion catalyst envisioned for Old Town when the Specific Plan was Create additional employment opportunities within the Temecula Valley ~ variOuS prOjeCt COtupODcl~ ate ~ tO Cl'eate aFptOX;'nnw-lY 2,~g:)O additioDa] lid.I-dixie equivaJe31t jobs. These additional jobs will consist of a ran~ ofptof~sional, skiil~i, and ~y-skiiled positions. The avenge ~i,,T is projected to be $19,600 per year. AccOrdinS to the adopted General Piath tlae City and Valley zed addifioml jobs m enhance the existing low jobs/housing ntio. The project is expected to 58 Cm czute ajobs/hot,~in_a ratio of 3.4:1 because it will amgt a mx4odty of employea from time e~gdn_a labor pool w~,h~,~ the Tazemh Valley. The positive conuibufion to joM/bous~ bahnce provides essmia~ ~enerate additional economic activity by accessing the regional murism market Thcv~e, aima~~a~relatedpm~L,~__txa,xponr. ms aze fozecast to generate an mdditioml 1.0m l':S ~mlon visiton m the T-,~,~,to Valley per year. Moat of these visiuxs will be from other mus in the economies, which will m-k-- a damstic conm~mtion and inqwovanent in local economic conditions. In generate s~vtox~ately $86,000,000 in 1997. The multiplicr effaa of rids additional local sZ~,~,,_o will Generate significant positive economic impact because of capital investment in labor and materials needed for construction of the project The commaion of ~se~ai~,~,at r--~ml-s, infnsuuam~ and other featutu of the project is fm~mst m some of these positive short-tam econr~ic benefits axe ms follows: sales volume = $99,6(X),000 and zesident income = $31,100,000. (Construction employment $31,100. Provide a means to finance many of the needed public improvements that support the Old Town Specific Plan The C~emzzal Plan, Old Town Specific Plan, and Capital Improveme~ Proguns irdfisdly ~ many needed public improvements in the southwestern qudnn~ of the City. The proposal project will enable m~ny Of these im,~mvemeuzs to be staled slid/or completed sooner tbau initially anticipated. l~_srmmpleS of these early infn,m'ucUtzc improvements include: · The extension of Fu'st Street and the reslisument of the in~g. ctlon with Fust and F, mn~ Sueets · Completion of the first phase of the Western Bypass Road and bridge; · Improvenents to the freeway .mn~ at Rancho California Road and ~n,~,e 1~; · Xmprovancms to the freeway romps at State Route 79 (south) and Immmz~ 15; · Repi~cem~,,, and expansion of Rastan Municipal Water District's lift station at Fust Stzeet~ · The consmtcfion of a town square or pt,,~ in the core of Old Town; · PrOv~dln~ needed park-in_a facififies around the Old Town azca. Generate new sources of public revenue to support nece&ury community services values attd by genm~fing additiollal sales alld ~ OCCvp"m'Y taxes. Looi mtevel~ zevangs, incause as arestdt of *hi-~ proPosed Project- The direct axmsml balefits expected to xcsult fn:ml the project, acamti~ to the Price Watahouse Report, in 1997 axe as follows: Tramlent Oco~p-,~y Tax ,~ $200,000; 59 n. OVERRm~NG CONgmER&TIONS This ~on of ~e d~ent ~~ ~e r~men~ ~ S~on 15~ of ~e ~v~me~ ~ Aa Gu~l~. ~ 15~ ~u~ ~ !~ ~e~ m ~ ~ d a p~ pw~ ~ ~ n~i~le s~i~t ~ imp, ~ m ~mi~ whe~ ~e ~jm m~ sipifi~ im~ m ~ ~~iy ove~n by ~e pwj~ ~fi~ when ~e ~o ~ w~ ~ ~!n~. ~ oufii~ h ~on E ~ve, Old Ton R~evel~mem ~j~ ~d p~ nvoi~ie s~fi~t ~g ~ env~men~ m~g~: ~ q~iW ~ ~e Tem~ C~ ~ ~ ~ ~e pmvio~iy ~ ~fin d ~e Old ~eve!~ment ~j~, wn~ h ~e p~ ~n ~ ~ w~ifio~ by ~ CiW, ou~eigh ~e nvoi~le si~ifi~t ~v~ en~men~ e~ w ~ q~iW ~ w~ ~ve ~n ou~ ~- In a Smz ~em ~mplo~nt h~en ~ 8 ~; whez ~e ~iliW w a~t ~w b~ ~ j~s ~ ~n ~ by a ~lo~ ~ion ~d limi~ ~o~; Ed whm m bli~t ~ dimi~h~ ~e CiW's ~iliW w ~ ~w u~ w ~e Old Ton ~ ~ ~e CiW ~ fi~ ~ ~e p~ pwjm's wnm~ufiom m jo~, m ~e l~ ~nomy, ~ w ~e CiW's ~HiW w ~ ~difio~ j~ ~ ou~ei~ ~e e~ ~ em~iom whi~ ~ll wt d~y ~ ~e i~ ~on; ~ o~ei~ ~e limit, shon-zm no~e e~e w m ~t ~y ex~fie~ m~ w high b~~d b~e of ~e proximiW of ~iden~ u~ w In~nm~ 15 ~d o~ mjor ~orough~,.-- ~e CiW Council's findi~s gt fo~ in ~e prying ~iom ~ve id~fifi~ ~l d ~e ~ve~ enviromen~ imp~ nd ~e f~ible mitigation m~ which ~ ~u~ im~ i~ignifi~t levels whe~ f~ible, ~ W ~e low~t ~hie~le levels where si~ifi~t uuvoi~le imp~ rein. ~e findi~ ~ve ~so ~~ five ~z~v~ W demm~ whe~er ~ey ~e r~o~le ~ f~ible ~~v~ w ~e pr~ ~on or whe~er ~ey m~ht r~u~ or elimi~ ~e ~o sig~fi~t ~p~ d ~e pr~ ~on. ~e HR ~nn evide~ ~t implementi~ ~e Old Ton ~evel~ment ~j~ will m~ s~fi~t ~vem impac~ which ~ot ~ subsingly m~a~ w imi~ifi~t levels. ~ sig~fi~t imp~ have ~n ouflin~ ~ve ~ ~e CiW Council fin& ~t ~l f~ible ~m~5 ~ miu~on m~ ~ve b~n ~ ~ idenfifi~ for implemen~on by ~e CiW ~ o~er ~~ible Agenci~. ~e CiW Council fi~ ~t ~e proj~'s ~nefi~ ~ subsm~ ~ oufiin~ in S~on G d~ument Ed sum~ ~e ~ ~t ~ ~nefiu j~fi~ ove~ding ~e nvoi~le signifier ~ve~ ~g ~h~ ~ ~e pr~s~ proj~. ~ fi~i~ ~ s~ by ~e f~t ~t ~y d ~e be~fi~ l~ ~ove ~ult in ~e proj~ hi~ a mjor to~r~fio~ ~MW ~ ~ Tem~uh ~ which ~ fo~t w wn~u~ w a s~fi~y ~u~r vi~iW for ~d ~n~ for sum d Old Ton ~ ~e ~ion ~l~h~ ~ ~e Old Town S~ific P~. ~er mjor h~~e i~rovemen~ ~ll ~nefit ~e w~m~iW s~ounding Old Ton, i~ludi~ evh~n~ ~ wn~ol ~iliti~ ~ ~ im~ovemenn aff~ti~ ~ ~u d ~e wn~iW ~Y e~fie~ing ~ w~nn. ~e CiW Co~cil ~er fin& ~t ~e benefit, when b~ ~mt ~e ~o u~voi~le si~ifi~t impacts, outweigh the impacts because of the social and economic values which accrue to the City of Temecula as outlined in Section G of this document. As the CEQA Lead Agency for the proposed action, the Temecula City Council has reviewed the project definition in the FIR and Section A of this document, and fully undersumds the projea proposed by the Old Town Redevelopment Project. Further, the City Council finds that all potential advene environmental imps~ and all feasible mitigation measures to reduce these impacts have been identified in the FIR, public comment, and public testimony. These impacts and mitigation measures are discussed in Sections D. 1, D.2 and E and the Council concurs with the facts and findings contained in those seaions. The City Council also finds that a reasonable range of alternatives was considered in the FIR and this document (Section F) and that one feasible alternative which can substantially lessen project impacts is available for adoption. The City Council concurs with the seven identified economic and social benefits which will result from implementing the proposed project. The Council has b~!~,nce~J these substantial social and economic benefits against the unavoidable significant adverse effects of the proposed project. Given the substantial social and economic benefits that will accrue to the City from developing and operating the Old Town Redevelopment Project, the City Council finds that the benefits identified herein outweigh the unavojd~,hle significant adverse impacts, and hereby override these unavoidable environmental effects to obtain the economic and social benefits listed in Section G. .'" 61 EXHIBIT B MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM R:%FOINS~"TAFFRFT.CC 8/7/95 kJb 10 CITY OF TEMECUI MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM FOR THE OLD TOWN REDEVEI PMENT PROJECT A. Tntrodncdon This mitigation monitoring program has been prepared for use by the City of Temecula as it implements mitigation measures for the Old Town Redevelopment Project, This program.. has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the State and City CEQA Guidelines, Assembly Bill 3180, effective January 1, 1989, required adoption of a reporting or monitoring program for those measures or conditions imposed on a pwject to mitigate or avoid adverse effects on the environment. The law states that the monitoring or reporting program shall be designed to ensure compliance during pwjea implementation. The monitoring program contains the following elements: 1) 2) All mitigation n~ssh-es are xecorded. TIffs MitiSsion Monitming ProSrim fMI~) is divided into two sections. The fixst setsion of the MMP lists the mitiffa~on messm'es cotuain~ within the Initial Study for second section lisa the mitigation measuzes identified in the F.,IR. The M3~ esmblishes the actions End procedures necesswJ to ensure compliance for all midSation measures as outlined below. A procedux~ for compliance and ,,~i~afion has bern outlined for each mi~~ation ruessure. In the attached MMP shee~s, the fh-st col,finn identifies the 'Genieral Impset.' The second co|mnn lists the 'Mitigation Measure.' Next, the 'Specific Pwcess' for monitoring is listS. It is followed in the MMP table by identification of the 'Mid~'sxion Milestone' for the miti~s~on measu~ and the 'Responsible Monitoring Party.' Any *Prereqnisirt Action For* the measur~ is identified sad a sitmature block is provided for 'Veri~ation' ths the measure has been implemented. 3) 4) The pw~rsm contains a sepsrse mitigation'monitoring record for each militiadon measure in the format outlined above. Copies of the MMP and supporting dsm records will be retained by the City of Temecula as pan of its project files. The MMP has been designed w be flexible. As monitoring pro~'esses, PkgnZes to compliance procedures my be necessary based upon recomm,'od,fions by tho$~ responsible for implementing the ProS, ram. If ~'hnnoes are IBIde. IZ'W mOnitOri33g complia31ce procedu~s and rewrds will be developed and ~ ~he Pro;. The total Pro;, includes any modificatioN, wiJl be retained by the Agency as part of the project files. The individual measures and the accompanying monitoring/reporting actions follow. They are numbered in the same sequence as presented in the lnitial Study and the EIR. R. ]~lltIpatjon Mpineares Identified in the lnltiml Study 1. Grading for roads and building pads may create unstable slopes with potential for slope failures. Mitigation rtt.l.a.1 The final grading plan for the site shall be reviewed and approved by an enginefling geologist with the speeme goal of preventing the ~on of This review and approval shall be completed prior to any engineering geologist by conducting in-grading inspections and if potential for slope failure is noted this problem shall be corrected to control the potential for slope failure. Specific Process Review and approval of the building construction plans by the City after the engineering geologist has reviewed the plans and determined that grading will not create a potential for slope failure or that measures have been incorporated to minimize slope failure. On-site construction inspection of the cut slopes by the engineering geologist. Mitigation Milestone Prior to issuance of grading permit(s). During construction for the on-site inspection. Rcg~onsible Monitoring Pnn;y Licensed Engineering Geologist, and City of Tcmecula Public Works Deparunent Prerequisite Action(s) For Review of the grading plan by the engineering geologist prior to submittal to the City. Submittal of grading plan to the City for review and approval. Initiating construction. City Verification C~ner~! lrr~.e~ 1. Grading for roads and building pads may create unstable slopes with potential for slope fzilures. Mitigation M-~-~u~ rtl.l.a~ The mo~n,,m inclination of all cut slopes shall be 2:1 (horizontal to vertical). Exeep~ons my be granted where a slope evaluation by a professional engineer or registered engineering geologist demonstrates that the geologic forumtions my be abk to sustain steeper slopes, but the mbility of any such proposed slopes shall be verified during geologic in-grading inspections. $.peei~c Process Review and approval of the building construction plans by the City after the professional engineer and/or engineering geologist has reviewed the plans and determined tha~ grading will not create a potential for slope failure or that measures have been incorporated to minimize slope failure. Engineer or geologist shall provide written field verification of the slope stability to the City, or provide alternative design requirements during construction. Mitigation Milestone Prior to issuance of grading permit(s). Prior to completion of construction for written field verification. Re~on.~ible Monitoring pnrty Lieensed Engineering Geologist and City of Temeeula Public Works Deparunent Prerequisite Actionf s) For Review of the grading plan by the engineering geologist prior to submittal to the City. Submittal of grading plan to the City for review and approval. Initiating field review during construction. City Verification 3 2. Grad in~ and ground disturbance creates a potential for erosion and sed imentation, on- and off-site. Mit'~tion The applicant shall prepare and submit a d_~tpiled erosion control plan that identifies specific erosion cOntFOi measures to control onsite and offsite erosion from the time the site is distm4mi until the disturbed areas are-fully developed and i,n~-~ped. This erosion control pin shall include the foUowing IDeasIH~s at a !minimama: a. Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimiTe soil exposure to winter rain period experienced in southern California. b, The BMMra] vegetation shah be l~__mined to the extellt feasible on all areas that will not be disturbed for grading (the exception is areas that must desred and revegetated as part of a fuel modification program to protect residences from wildland fares). ... ]T[.1.b.3 All slopes that will be greater than ten feet high shall be evaluated to define the optimnm length and steephess to minlmiTe flow velocity and erosion potential. Lateral drninn~e coUection systems shall be incorporated at the base of slopes to transport flows in a contoned, non-erodible eJannnel. The plan shah indicate where flows on the site can be diverted from denuded areas and carried in the natural channels on the site. Measures in man-made channels to minimiTe rtmoff velocities shall be "identified and implemented. Disturbed areas shall be protected through 1) physical stabilization (such as geotextiles, mats, or other materials (where needed); 2) vegetative stabilization; and 3) millchinE. Establish sediment traps, silt fences, and related support features (such as rock falters) on the property to control the release of sediment from disturbed areas. The design and location of such traps shah be identified in the plan. 4 The channel desiSned to trampon flows to the'nearest reSional flood control facility shall be described and the adequacy of the channel shall be demo~sU ateJ with a detailed drainage analysis. An impecfion and molntenonce program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on- or offsite will be corrected through a remedi~jon or restoration program within a AB disturbed arm shah nltlmmtely either be covered with impervious material or reveaetmed with native and/or r~e and drought resistant vegetation. The developer shall identify a bond mount for implementing the erosion control program and provide the :City with a bond for this mount. Install permanent erosion control and runoff facilities that are sufficient to ensure that surface runoff will not cause Ion~-term erosion on- or offsite, Specific Process Review and approval of the Erosion Control Plan by the City. Monitor the plan implementation during construGtion and operation of the facilities. Require erosion/sedimentation remediation where erosion control measures fail and erosion occurs until on- and off-site erosion is eliminated. Mitiration Milestone Prior to issuance of grading permit(s). During construction and when operations are initiated. Re~ponqiblc Monitoring Party City of Temecula Public Works Department Prerequisite Actionf s) For Review and approval of the erosion control plan prior to initiating the grading plan by the City. Initiating field review during construction. 5 City Verification 6 General Impact Ground disturbance on the hillside can caus~ short-~rm visual impacts due to exposed graded Mitigation M~.~ure TH.I.c.4 A landscape plan shall be completed for review and approval by the City. This plan shall provide for flail ,Lyenotation of the road cut dopes mili~inl~ native/ornamental plants which will serve as a fire buffer area. On the constructed building pads the landscape plan shall include the pipntiug of large trees (psinjnaaam 4" diameter);..-.-~!i'tely after construction of the pads is completed. The effect of the revegetation plan will be to blend the slopes into the natural coastal sage scrub and :?hamSeel chaparral comnlatnjfieS west of the Western By-Pass Road. The revegeta~on 'goal for the pads will be to visually screen and soften the effect of the flat, graded and paved pads. A bond or equivalent commitment, as provided by City ordinance, shall be provided by the developer to ensure that the site can be revegetated after Sl~-,cific Process The City shall review and approve the landscape plan to determine that the landscaping goals identified in this measure are fully addressed. The City shall moniwr the plan implementation during consu'uction and operation of the facilities to ensure it meets the goals identified in this measure. Mitigation Mileswnc The plan shall be approved prior to initiating any construction on the Westside Specific Plan facilities. This shall include the bond or equivalent commitment to ensure adequate funds are available to revegeutte disturbed areas. Monitoring shall occur by inspections during construction and facility operation. Relpon~ible Monitoring City of Temecula Planning Department PrereqDisite Action(s) For Review and approval of the landscaping plan prior to initiating Found disturbance on Westside Specific Plan facilities. 7 Initiating c~nstm~tion and ol~ration. City V~rifi~tion Gcncr~! Impact Disturbance Of Murrieta Creek Channel. Mitigation M~.~ure ffLl.g.5 The brid~es shall be installed in a manner that will not adversely impact the ability of Murrieta Creek to carry the desikm flows emblished by the Corps of Enaineers and the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District. Permits or waivers from such permits for installation Of the bridges shill] be obtained frOill the Corps of F_Jigilieers, the County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, the State Department of Fish and Game, and the Cn!Ifornia Regional Water Quality Control Board. The developer shall implement the conditions of these.permits. ' Specific Process Permits or waivers from such permits for installation of the bridges shall be obtained from the Corps of Engineers, the County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, the State Department of Fish and Game, and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board. The developer shall implement the conditions of these permits.Bridge designs and engineering drawings shall be reviewed and approved by the agencies listed above to be consistent with channel requirements established by the regulatory agencies. Conditions contained in permits or waivers from permits shall be monitored during construction for compliance. Mitigation Milestone Approvals for bridge design and engineering shall be obtained prior to initiating construction on any of the bridge segments. Permit conditions shall be monitoring during construction of the bridges. Re~on~ible Monitoring par~y City of Temecula Public Works Department. Regulatory agencies issuing permits. Prerequisite Action(s) For Review and approval of bridge designs by regulatory agencies. Consu'uction of the bridges. City Verification 10 General Impact Disturbance of Murriem Creek Channel. Mi~ation M,-~,.~ure 1Tl.l.g.6 The bridges shall be constructed durin~ the dry, or low flow season to the extent feasible. During cometion of the bridges specific erosion and sediment control measures shall be implemented to minimiT~ movement of se-llmmut from active construction areas. Meksures to accomplish this include diverting any surface water around the project sate, installation of silt fences, sediment traps/basins, rock rdters, and other comparable measures to reduce the tramport of sediment from the construction area during construction. Post construction sediment control shall also be implemented and the construction area shall be returned to a functional status following construction consistent with the ultimate design of the Murrieta Creek Specific Process Review and approval of the bridge construction schedules and the channel erosion control plan. Monitoring the plan during construction and following installation of the bridges. Require erosionisedimentation remediation where erosion control measures fail and erosion occurs within the channel during or after bridge construction. Mitigation Milestone Approvals for bridge construction schedules and channel erosion control plan shall be obtained prior to initiating construction on any of the bridge segments. Plan measures and effectiveness shall be monitoring during construction of the bridges and following bridge completion until one winter has passed. Rciponsible Monitoring Pnr~v City of Temecula Public Works Department. Prerequisite Actionfs} For Review and approval of the schedule and plan prior to initiating bridge construction. Review of erosion following a winter with normal flows in Murrietn Creek. 11 CRy Veri~tion 12 General Inlpa~ Exposure of people or property to geologic !~7~rds. Mitigation M--.qure IH.l.h.7 All new structures installed in conjunction with this project shall be designed to comply with the most recent Uniform Building Code seismic design standards. If the Enginering Geologist/Registered Engineer identifies more stringent site specific design standards, the developer shall impInherit' such standards for buildings constructed under approvals for this project. Specific Process Review and approval of the structural seismic design requirementS." Monitoring during construction to verify construction proceeds as identified on building plans. Mitigation Milestone Approvals for seismic design for structures shall be obtained prior to initiating construction'on any specific structure. Conformance with building plans shall be monitoring during construction of the structures. Responsible Monitoring Pnrl~y City of Temecula Building and Safety Department. PrereQuisite Actionfs~ For Submittal of the building plans. InitiaTing construction of buildings. Ci~ Verification 13 6cncrai Impact Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards. Mitigation Mngure X!I.I.h.8 The devdoper simll have a site slx. eiflc geoteehnieni evaluation prepared by a qudifmd and ficensed gqgjneering Geologist and/or Re~tered Professional Engineer. This report shall address, but is not !ImPted to, ground shmklug hazards, slope stability, fiquefaction potenthi, and subsidence (as appropriate for each site) and provide design recommendatioBs that will ensure the structural integrity of new structures to protect humans occupying the strucnff~ in the future. The City shall require the developer to implement these design requirements. ... Specific Process The Ci~ shall review and approval of xhc si~c spcci~c gco~chnicai evaluation(s) and determine that su'uctuml design implements Re design requirements of the evaluaxjon(s). Monitoring during consxruc~on xo verify consu~cfion proceeds as idenrjfied on building pla~s. Miti2ation Milestone Approvals for Re geow. chnical evaluation(s) shall be obtained prior xo initiating consu'uction on any specific su'ucture or sixe. Conformancc wiwh building plans shall bc moniu~ring during consu'ucfion of d~c su'ucuu'es. Re~onsible Monixorix~ Par~ City of Tcmecula Public Works Department Prereq.uisi~c Action(s) t:or Submitul of xhe geow. chnical evaluations and building plans. |nifiating consulaction of buildings. Ci~/Verification 14 General Impact Exposure of people or property to geologic MitiZ~tion M..~ure ;H.l.h.9 If existing ~ngmru are ~fi~i-e~, the ~ integrity shall be ~nu~diated to meet the design requi, c~"~ of the Engineeran~ Geologist and/or Registered Professional Engineer. Specific Process The City shall review and approval of the specific design requirements for reuse of existing structures and determine that structural design implements the .d. esign requirements of the engineering geologist/professional engineer. Monitoring during construction to verify-construction proceeds as identified on building plans. Mit~ation Milestone Approvals for the structural design requirements for reused structures shall be obtained prioi: to initiating construction on any specific structure being reused. Conformance with building plans shall be monitoring during construction of the structures.. ReSponsible Monitoring p~r~, City of Temecula Public Works Department. Prerequisite Action(s~ For Submittal of the design requirements and building plans. Initiating construction of buildings, City Verification 15 Collected surfate runoff delivemt to Murrim Creek from the Wesw. xn By-pa~ road, howl and arena could cause damage m the c. lmnn~! awough erosion andlot sedimenmflon. Mitigation M,~ure HI.3.a.10 The surface runoff drainaZe system incorporated into the Western By-pass road and the hotel and Arena engineered development pad(s) shall be designed to meet the following requirements: 1'he dralm~~ shall be desiZned to tramport the expeaed lO0- year runoff from upstream areas or the pad(s) to Murrieta Creek without damage to adjacent property or tO. the Creek channel; and be The points where surface runoff is intercepted along the road shall be designed to emure that headward (upstream) erosion is not initiated and that erosion and _s~dlmeut generation do not exceed naUarai rates of erosion and sedlmentation for the project area. The drainage system from the pad(s) to Muftieta" Creek shall also be designed. . to prevent increased erosion along the drainage system improvements and at the point where the surface runoff from the pad(s) enters the Creek channel. Specific Process The City shall review and approve the surface drainage system design from these facilities to Murrieta Creek and determine that redirected flows will not cause erosion or sedimentation damage based on standard flood design requirements. Monitoring during conswuction to verify construction proceeds as identified on drainage system plans. Mitigation Milestone Approvals for the surface drainage system from the Westside Specific Plan area shall be obtained prior to initiating construction on any facilities west of Murrieta Creek. Conformanee with building plans shall be monitoring during construction of the structures. ReSponsible Monitoring par~ City of Temecula Public Works Department. 16 Prerequisite Actionf s) For Submittal of the drainage system design and building plans for facilities west of Murrieta Creek. Initiating construction of facilities. City Verifi~tion 17 General Impnet The volume of runoff from increased impervious areas could increase downsu'eam flood hazards. Mitigation M,'n~nre lIIj.b.ll When the development pads are ~ and constructed within the Westside Specific Plan Area, the surface runoff above the volume presently generated shall be detained on time project site and released approylm,,tely hours after peak flows Wi~hln Mllrrieta-Creek have passed throt!~ the project area. Specific Process The City shall review and approve the surfacc drainage system design from these pads, including the detention facilities and the information upon which they are designed. Monitoring during construction to verify construction proceeds as identi~cd on drainage system plans. Mitigation Milestone Approvals for the surface drainage system from the pads shall be obtained prior to initiating construction of any development pads west of Murrieta Creek. Conforrnanee with building plans shall be monitoring during construction of the pads. Re~;Km-~ible Monitoring Pnr~ City of Temecula Public Works Dcparunent. Prerequisite Action(s) For Submittal of the drainage system design, and grading and building plans for facilities west of Muftieta Creek. Initiating consu'uction of facilities. City Veri~e'~tion 18 The volume of runoff from increased impervious areas could increase downsrosin flood hszards. MitiS~tion M~-~ure H/.3.b.12 The project slm]l install all drainale improvenents within the Murrieta Creek Chenn~! that ire req~ to hiDdie mm rillloll from these arens improved ns part of the proposed project. ~ne projea shall also contribute its fair sinre to any channel improvements tim must be completed to ensure' that c~nmulatjve runoff increases do not cause downstry_rim flood hazards or significant damage from surface runoff in Murrim Creek and the Santa Margarita River. · ** SIP--ci~c Process The City shall review and approve the surface drainage improvements for new surface flows entering Murrieta Creek. The applicant shall submit data to the City identifying any fair share costs for the main channel and the City shall review and approve this clam and ensure fair share funds are provided to the agency conswucting these improvements. .- Monitoring during construction to verify construction proceeds as identified on drainage improvement plans. Mitigation Mileswne Data submittals and approvals for the surface drainage improvements entering Murrieta Creek shall be obtained prior to initiating construction of any development pads west of Murrieta Creek. Conformance with building plans shall be monitoring during construction of the pads. Responsible Monitorinf P.rOt City of Temecula Public Works Deparunem and Riverside County Flood Conn'ol. Prerequisite Action(s) For Submittal of the drainage system improvements for facilities west of Murrieta Creek. Initiating construction of facilities. Cky Verification 19 The developmere of the fgilities west of Murrieta Creek could muse adverse water quality impa~s due to urban pollutants. Miti~tion M,.*~ure ffl.3.e.13 The illld'Cgped sireIs shill be irrigated ill a m'nnn'"'r that does DOt resIdt ill overland flows of surfnee water and the di-,,hnpge of ferfiljz~ and pesticide eOnfeminMed stirfat9 rimOff tO Mtlrrieta Creek. The lalldstape dpsig~ and irrigation systems shall be ~t,ie,cd by the City to verify runoff controls are adequate to prevent inadvertent surface runoff. Specific Process ... The City shall review and approve the landscape designs and irrigation system with specific evaluation of minimizing imdverterrc surface runoff. Monitoring during construction to verify construction proceeds as identified on the irrigation system, including verification that inadvertcnt flows are not created during irrigation. Mitigation Milestone Approval of lamBcape designs and irrigation plans shall be obtained prior to initiating construction of any facilities west of Murrieta Creek. Conformance with building plans shall be monitoring during construction of the pads. Responsible Monitoring P~rty City of Temecula Planning Deparnnent. Prerequisite Action(s~ For Submittal of the landscape design and irrigation system plans for facilities west of Murrieta Creek. Initiating construction of facilities. City Verification 2O General Irnl~t The development of the fs:ilities west of Murrieta Creek could ~ause adverse water quality i~ due to urban po!lutants. Mitiration M~m.~ure 1TL3.e.14 Specific Proctss The project owners shall prepare and implement a sweeping plan approved by the City to sweep paved areas and graded parking areas one time per week at a mJnJmama~ and at least six times during the month of Oetoberprior to the onset of the winter storm season. The City shall review and approve the sweeping plan. Monitoring during operations to verify sweeping is implemented in accordance with the plan. Mitigation Milestone Approval of the sweeping plan shall be obtained prior to initiating operations at any paved or parking areas. Random inspections of the sweeping at least two times per year once operations begin. Responsible Moniwring P~r~v City of Temecula Community Services and/or Public Works Departments Prerequisite Action(s) For Submiual of the sweeping plan for City review. Initiating use of or operation of paved and/or parking areas. City Verification 21 The runoff from the animal stable area of the Wild West Arena west of Murrleta Creek could cause adverse water quality impact. Miti~tion M,u~ur~ ffg.3.~15 The project owner shall implement sanitary hm,~ Veeping procedures that miniml-e tile potential for surface water poUtRants to be incorporated into surface water discharges from the project site. These procedures sinill be incorporated into a writien procedure that must be approved by the City Plmnning ])ep~ and the Regional Water Quality Control Board. Specific Process ... The City and Regional Board shall review and approve the stable area house keeping plan. Monitoring during operations to verify plan is implemented. Mitigation Milestone Approval of the housekeeping plan shall be obtained prior to initiating operations at the arena. Random inspections of housekeeping operations at least one time per month after operations begin. Reipop.~ible Monitoring P~rly City of Temecula Building and Safety Department Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board PrereqDisite Actionis} For Submittal of the housekeeping plan for City and Regional Board review. Initiating use of or operation of the arena. City Verification 22 The runoff from the animal stable area of the Wild West Arena west d Murrieta Creek could cause adverse water quality impacls. Mitigation M~u-~ure fff.3.e.16 Any surface runoff geneS. from the stable area shall either be r~__~i,ed, treated and reused on the project site, or treated to standards required to prefect the receiving water quality standards for Muftieta Creek before:being tciz-"~d from the project site. The proeedure selected shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer and the Regional Water Quality Control Specific Process The City and Regional Board shall review and approve the stable area surface water runoff management plan. Monitoring during operations w verify plan is implemented. Mitigation Milestone Approval of the surface water runoff management plan shall be obtained prior to initiating operations at the arena. Random inspections of management methodology implemented at the stable area at least one time per month after operations begin. Responsible Moniwring Par~ City of Temecula Public Works Department Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board Prerequisite Actionis) For Submittal of the surface water management plan for City and Regional Board review and approval. Initiating arena operations. CiW Verification 23 C, cz~! ]nlF~ Exposure of strictures or people to flood lu, n, rds in Old Town. Mitignion M--~ur~ r!T3.i.17 Bridges and mattrtsinment structures and infrasmscture shall be intolied in a manner that protects them from significant damage from a 100-year flood along Murrieta Creek. The m-uctu~ and bridge designs shall integrate the proposed fac~ities into the ultimate design solution for Murrieta Creek :being prepared by the Corps of Engineers and County Flood Control without causing significant constraints in managing design flood flows. The project owners shall participate in the dam inundation evacuation plans for any facilities not protected from the potential collapse.of the Vall Lake dam. Specific Process The applicant shall demonstrate to the City how the bridges and structures will be prot~ted from significant damage due to the lO0-year flood by submitting a flood hazard report for review and approval. :.- Monitoring during construction to verify construction proceeds as identified in the flood hazard protection report. Evacuation plans that will be implemented if upstream dams fail shall be submined to the City for review and approval. Mitigation Milestone Approval of the flood hazard report and evacuation plan shall be obtained prior to constructing any of the facilities within hnT~rd areas within Old Town. Conforman~ with building plans shall be monitoring during construction of the pads. Re4pon~ible Monitoring Party City, of Tem~ula Public Works Department Prerequisite Action(s) For Subminal of the flood hazard report and evacuation plan for City review and approval. Initiating construction of facilities. 24 City V~ri~cation "~ General lnlD~ Bridges could become barrim to migration or movemere of animals. Mititstion M,,~.~,n'e IILS.d.18 BridSe designs sek;ted for brid&~s constructed in support of this project shah not create any permanent ~ tO the movecut of mnlm~lq along the Murrim Creek riparian corridor. Specific Process Bridge designs shall be included in submittals to the Corps of Engineers and Department of Fish and Game to verify that no barriers to animal movemere is created... Mitigation Milestone The Corps 404 and DFG 1601 permit/agreemem shall be obtained prior to initiating construction on any bridges. R~n~ible MonitorinS Pnrty Corps of Engineers/U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Departmere of Fish and Game Prerequisite Action(s~ For Preparation of bridge designs that do not pose a barrier to animal movement. Submittal of applications to the Corps and DFG. City Vcri~tion 26 Miti~tion M~m~e A lifhf~g plan shall be f~b..alleJ to the City Nonnlnl, I)elmmnent for review and app, oval for fadlifim devdoped by this project. This plan shall include prior conmPotj n with the California T. 4lh~ie of Technology for all qyoatitot'-ve iightlnf requh'emems eonfolned ill COylILT Of Riverside The lighting plan shall be xeviewed and appxovM by the City. Monitoring during constntction to vedfy ~ pwceeds as i~fied in the lil~tlng plan. Mi~fion MileroBe The plan ~hnll be appwved IRier to t:onstmction of any f,,m'iitles with eatmior ligl~ing. Conformance with hiding plans shall be monitoring dxxting coralfiction of the exterior liglRinE at facilities. Responsible Monitoring Party City of Temecula Building and Safety Depamnent ~isite Action(V) For Submittal of the lighting plan for ~ and nppwval. Initiating con,Crnction Of facilities. City Vefifimtion General Impact Increased raffic hazards during construction. Mitigation M,'~-~ure lK13.f2.0 · During constnmfion that affeas the local roads, the projea owner shall provide adequate traffic control resources (sirnlq, proteaive devices, crossing devices, detours, fisgpersom, etc.) to maintain Safe traffic flow. If construaion w~thln a road right-of-way is not completed by the end Of the day's work, the contractor or agency shall ensure that an adequate traff'~ access route exists to all areas where aceess exists at the time of construajon. Specific Process A traffic safety plan for constructing facilities shall be reviewed and approved by the City. Monitoring during construction to verify that traffic control resources are provided as identified in the traffic safety plan. Miti~,ation Milestone The plan shall be approved prior to construction of any facilities. During building inspections traffic safety equipment shall be reviewed and conformance with the safety plan verified. Respov.~ible Moniwrin~ P~qy City of Temecula Public Works Depm'unent Prerequisite Action(s} For Submittal of the traffic safety plan for review and approval. Initiating construction of facilities. City Verifir'~tion 28 General Impact Increased Raffle hazards during consunction. Mifi~tion M,~-~ur~ 1II.13.L21 Traffic hazards that my affect vehi-i~s, bicycles, ped~, or horses (such as speed b-raps, trenches, or uneven paths) shall be identified and access controlled by the project owner. Specific Process A traffic safety plan for conswuaing facilkies shall be reviewed and approved by the City. Monitoring during consmwtion to verify that traffic control resources arc provided, as identified in the traffic safety plan, including controlled access to consreaction areas. Mitigation Milestone The plan shall be approved prior to construction of any facilities. During building inspections traffic safety equipment and access shall be reviewed and conformance with the safety plan verified. Relpomible Monitoring PnrW City of Temecula Public Works Deparunent Prerequisite Actionis) For Submittal of the traffi.c safety plan for review and approval. Initiating construction of facilities. Ciw Verification 29 """ G~ral Impact Increased u-affic b~-~rds durin2 construction. Mitigation M,'~urc 1Tl.13.f.12 No open Uek?ks or traffic safety imurds shall be left in road rights-of-way durln_o periods when tralTac controls and construction personnel are not present. Such hazards shall be ellmlp-ted or an alternative route provided without hazards before employees leave a working area at or adjacent to a road. Specific Process A traffic safety plan for constructing facilities shall be reviewed arid approved by the City. Monitoring during construction to verify that traffic control resources are provided, as identified in the traffic safety plan, including controls after construction ends for the day or weekend. Mitigation Milestone The plan shall be approved prior to construction of any facilities. During building inspections traffic safety equipment shall be reviewed and conformance with the safety plan verified. Re~ongible Monitoring Party City of Temecula Public Works Department Prerequisite Action(s) ~:or Submittal of the traffic safety plan for review and approval. Initiating construction of facilities. City Verification 30 Increased u'affic hazards during consu-uaion. Mit~tion Tfi.13.f.23 All roads shsll be sdequstely repsired after constns~on is completed in an area to ensure that traffic ~nu move in the saute manner as before COIIStr!lCtjOn wjthollt ~ or discomfort to re]licks sad passengers. :$j~eci~c Process A circulation system repair plan shall be reviewed and appmvcd by the City. Monitoring during construction to verify that repairs are provided as"{den~~ed in the repair plan. Mitigation Milestone The plan shall be approved prior to construction of any facilities. Prior to accepting road repairs as complete, the City shall verify that repairs have been completext as identified in the circulation system repair plan. Re~onsible Monitorine p.r~y City of Temecula Public Works Department Prerequisite Actionf s) For Submittal of the circulation system repair plan for review and approval. Completing construction of facilities and repair of circulation system facilities. Ciw Verification 31 XK14.a.2~ The devdop~-shall confs with the Rancho California Water ~ (RCWD) ~4~_ the, _' ~ h4 of the Western By-lmss tO ensure that the water di~trmnmn~ line, ff dramrod _u cevs~ry for fire protection pro'poses, is installed when the road k unsU!lmd, Specific Process The applicant shall submit a 1_ __~'__ veaif'yin~ that the RC'WD and fire protr~Xlon agency have been consulted and the size of water line tint w~l be inmall,xl in the Westran By-pass Road, ff any. This leer:or shah contain ~M~IY, S Of ,.va).A'q~t~i;Ve8 fi'om. the two l:n~in~rin~ dmwinp of the Westena By-pass Road shall down the size and location of all ~ bifrastnlctu~, including tlz water line. Monitoring during construction to vea'~ that the water line is in.en!i~l as pmpos~ in li dmwingqo MiStion lviucstonc The letter and plans shall be approved prior to con,muction of the Western By-pass Road. During construction inspections tlz inStallatiOn of the line in conformante with the cqgim'eHn~ drawings sh,,n bc verified. ~sible Monit~n[' Ps~ty City of Temecula Public Works and River~__de County\City of Te~ecvlm l:rire Departme~. Submittal of the letter and drawings for ~ and apprmmL City Vsrifi,~.rm 32 ~l xmpact Wildland fil*c hazards my affect fac~'l~s pn:sposui by the Westside Specifw Plan. 1V[itiJ~atlon M,.~mrre 1Tl.14.a.26 Alon~ the west and east aidms of the Western By-lmss Road a fare and ve~lation mami~nmat plan slmll be prepared and submitted to the City and RCFD for review and mppa(bvdl. This plan simll provide ~ mfficient buffer of f'tre retardant p~ontin~ to mmre timt mum~ on the eut side of the road are not expoml to m~da-nd f'tre haurds from ~ fire in the dmparrai on the west side of the road. Sl~c Process for xcvicw and approval ]VXitig;tioll ]VIiJr-stone .... The fire and vegetation management plan shah be npproved prior to construction of any ~cn'litips west of Murrieta Creek. During construction in-_~tions the instnnntion of the fire protection and vegetation coxnpmumts in conformance with the plan shall be verified. ReSponsible Monitoring Parl3 City of Temeeula Planning Department and Riverside County/City of Temeeula Fire Departm~ Prerequisite Action(l) For Submittal of the plan for review and approval. Initiating construction. City Vcrifie"ation 33 General Impnet The project my create a significant demand for limited law enforcement resources. Mitigation 1II.14.b,17 The facility owner/operator shall negotiate an agreement with law enforcement officials to pFovide adequate law enfoFcement peFsonnel for all enter~ facility opelafions, izich~dln~ related traffic control, Specific Process A copy of the agreement shall be provided to the City. Mitiration Milestone The agreement shall be filed with the City prior to initiating operations of any facility. Re~ora.~ible Monitoring Party City of Temecula City Manager's Office and Police Department PrereQuisite Actionfs~ For Submittal of the agreement for retemion in the project file prior to operating any of the facilities. City Verification C. Mitigation Mes~dres Identified in the !?,nvironwnt~ntml lnlDmft R~uort The project may cause significant air po!lutant emissions during construction. Mitigstion M,m-~ure 4.2.3.1 Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the project proponents shall demonstrate to the City Engineer the actions that will be taken to comply with SCAQMD Rule 402, which requires that there be no dust impacts offsite sufficient to cause a nuisance, and SCAQMD Rule 403, which restricts visible omi~iOIL6 from construction. Specifm measures will include moirenine sod prior to gradlug, daily watering of exposed surfaces or treating with soft conditioner to stabilize the soil; washing truck fireS' and covering loads of dirt transported offsite; cessation of grading during periods of high winds over 25 miles per hour, and paving, co*tlue or S~e4inl~ graded areas at the earliest possible time after soft disturbance. 35 Specific Process The applicant shall submit a fugitive dust con~ol plan to the City for review and approval. ._,~ Monitoring during construction to verify that the plan is implemented as proposed. Mitigation Milestone The plan shall be filed with the City prior to initiating any construction activities in support of the project. During construction .inspections disturbed areas shall verify that the fugitive dust measures contained in the plan are being implemented. Responsible Monitoring Party City of Temecula Public Works Dcparuncnt Prerequisite Action(s~ For Submittal of the plan to the City for review and approval. Initiating construction of the proje, ct. Ciw Verification C',ener~i ImlP~ The project may cause significant air po!!utant missions during construction. Mitigstion M,.m-~ure 4.2.3.2 All construction equipment will be m-int-ined in IMmk operating condition so as to reduce operational mlmdons. 5F-ci~c Process ' The applicant shall submit a copy of the grading contract with this requirement identified in the contract and the method of compliance by the contractor identified, such as engine tune-ups within three months prior to initiating construction or during the construction effort. Moniwring during construction to verify that the plan is implemented as proposed. Mitigation Milutone The copy of the contra~ ~hall be filed with the City prior to initiating any consinaction activities in support of the project. During construction inspections equipment operating dam shall be available to verify compliance with this requirement. Reaponsible Monitoring Party City of Temecula Public Works Department Prerequisite Actionf s} For Submittal of the contract to the City for review and retention. Initiating construction of the project. City Verification General Irrlp~ct The project may cause significant air pol|mznt emissions during consm3aion. Mitigation M~ure 4.2.3.3 Equipment shall use iow-sulfur diesel fuel. Specific Process The applicant shall submit a copy of the grading contract with this requiremere idemi~ed in the conwact and the method of compliance by the conwar, or identified, such as fuel purchase conwacu or invoices. Monitoring during conslruction to verify that the plan is implemented as proposed. Mitifation Milestone The copy of the contract shall be filed with the City prior to initiating any construction activities in support of the project. During construction inspections fuel purchase dam shall be available to verify compliance with this requirement. Responsible Monitoring pnr~v City of Temecula PIning Department Prerequisite Action(s) For Submiual of the contract to the City for review and retention. Initiating construction of the project. City Verification 37 General Impact The project may cause significant air pollutant emissions during consu'uction. Mitigation 4.2.3.4 E!earic e.~t~fuuent will be used to the maxhnum extent feasible. Specific Process The applicant shall submit a list of all electric equipment that is capable of being used at the site; electrical equipment that will be utilized at the construction site; and if some available electrical equipment will not be used, why it will not be used. Monitoring during construction to verify that the electrical equipment identified for use is actually used at the construction sites. Mitigation Milestone The copy of the list shall be filed with the City prior to initiating any construction activiti~..in support of the project. During construction inspections shall verify the presence of electrical equipment listed. Responsible Monitoring Party City of Temecula Building and Safety Deparunem Prerequisite Actionts~ For Submittal of the list to the City for review and retention. Initiating construction of the project. City Vcrifi,'~tion 38 C~r~ral Irnpzct ~ The project may cause signi~cmn air pollumnt missions durin~ consunction. Miti~tion M~-~urc 4.2.3.5 Trucks and construction eq-il,-,,,'q will limit idfing. Trucks and equipment that my be left to idle for more than lS minqltl~ shall be shut down. Specific Process The applicant shall submit a copy of the grading contract with this requirement identified in the contract and the method of compliance by the contractor identified. Monitoring during construction to verify that idling equipmere do~S not idle for more than 15 minutes. Mitigation Milestone The copy of the contra~t shall be filed with the City prior to initiating any construction activiU.'es in support of the project. During construction inspections shall verify equipment does not idle more than 15 minutes. Re~pon.~ible Monitoring Party City of Temecula PIning and/or Building and Safety Departments Prerequisite Action(s~ For Submittal of the contract to the City for. review and retention. Initiating construction of the project. City Verification 39 C, ener~! Imp=at The pwject may cause signifyant air pollutant emissions during consu'uaion. Mitigation 4.2.3.6 To the maximm extent fusibk, comtruetion activities that affect traffic flow will be restricted to off-peak hours (i.e., between 7:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. and between 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m.). Specific Process The applican~ shsil submiz n copy of the grnding conu'z~ wi~ this requiremen~ identified in the contract and the method of compliance by the contractor identified. Monitoring during construction to verify that construction equipment and mau~rials are not delivered during morning (6 a.m. and 10 a.m.) and afternoon (3 p.m. and 7 p.m.) commute periods. Miti~tion Milestot~- The copy of the contract shall be filed with the City prior to initiating any construction activities in support of the projea. During construction inspections shall verify equipment is not delivered during commuting hours. Relponsible Monitorin~ City of Temecula Public Works Deparunent Prerequisite ActioniC) For Submittal of the contract to the City for review and retention. Initiating construction of the project. Ci~, Verification 40 General Impact The project may cause significant air pollutant emissions during construction. Mitifation M~m.~ure 4.2.3.7 Colon employees simll be provided with transit information and the contractor shall submit and implyneat an approval ride share program for construction employs. ~. Specific Process The applicant shall submit a copy of the ~rading conurea with this requirement identified in the contract and the method of compliance by the contractor identified.:. A copy of the wansit information and ride share program information shall be supplied to the City, The Average Vehicle Ridership (AVR) target shall be identified in this information package submitted to the City, Monitoring during construction to verify that AVR is being fulfilled shall be conducted by .the City. Mitil/ation Milestone The copy of the conwaa shall be filed with the City prior m initiating any consu'uaion activities in support of the project. During consu~aion inspe~ons shall verify the AVR at least one time per month during consu'uction. Responsible Monimrin~ P~ny City of Temecula Planning Deparunent Prerequisite Action(s) For Submiual of the conu'act m the City for review and retention. Initiating consu'uction of the proira. City Verification 41 General lml;mct The project my cause significant air polhnant emissions during construction. Mitiption M~.~nre 4~.3.8 PTe-coMed and pre-coloFed miteriRIs will be used in construction to the extent feasib~ Specific Process -" The applicant shall submit a short report identifying thos~ facilities for which pre-coated and pre- colored materials can and will be used. Monitoring during construction to verify that these mazrials are bei'ng used where identifr, d in the report. Mitigation Milestone The copy of the report shall be filed with the City prior to initiating any construction activities in support of the project. ' During construction inspections shall verify the use of these rnaterials by conducting random inspections during delivery and use of such materials. Respon.~ible Monitoring P~rl~, -\ City of Temecula Building and Safety Department Prerequisite Actjones) For Submittal of the report to the City for review and retention. Inkiating construction of the project. City Verification 42 General lmpa~ The project may cause significant air pollumnt emissions durir~ consunction. Mitiratjon 4.2.3.9 Prior to ismaln~ a butldin_~ permit, the City will require doormenration from the applicant that proper precautions have been taken so that workers are not exposed to unsafe levels of haurdous air pollution. Specific Process The applicant shall submit a short report identifying those hazardous materials that will be used in construction and those facilities where such rnaterials will be used. Monitoring during conslruction to verify that these materials are being used in the manner required where identified in the report. Mitigation Milestone The copy of the report shall be filed with the City prior 'to initiating any construction activities in support of the project. During construction inspections shall verify the use of these materials in conformance with requirements by conducting random inspections during use of such materials. Responsible Monitoring Par~ City of Temecula Building and Safety Deparunent Prerequisite Actionfs~ For Submittal of the report to the City for review and retention. Initiating construction of the project. City Verification 43 The project may cause significant air po!lutant emissions during operations. Mitigation M~.~ure 4.2.3.10 projectdesignwi!lineorporateetmZy-savln~_featuatsthroughouttheProjeet, including low-mnission water heaters, eemral water heating systems, and built-in enm'gy effkient appli~.nc~. Specific Process The applicant shall submit a short report identifying all 'energy-szving futures used in the facilities and compiling a sumhurry of total ezrgy savings for ~ facility. Monitoring during conswuction to verify that these features have been installed as identified in the report. Mitigation Milestone The copy of the report shall be filed with the City prior to initiating consnuction of any facilities containing energy using equipment. During construction impections shall verify the use of these featur~ in structures. ReSponsible Monitoring PnrO' City of Temecula Building and Safety Department Prerequisite Actionts~ For Submittal of the report to the City for review and retention. Initiating construction of the project. City Verification General Impa~t The project may muse significant air pollutant emissions during operations. Mitigation M,-~gure 4.2.3.11 The project ~ install bus transit shelters and benches in Old Town and within the Westside Specific Plan area in coordination with the local transit agency and the City to provide on site transit service. Specific Process The applicant shall submit wansit implementation plan identifying all transit facilities that will be installed in support of the project for City review and approval... " Monitoring during construction to verify that the transit features have been installed as identified in the plan. Mitigation Milestone The copy of the plan shall be filed with the City prior to initiating construction of any faciliffes. During construction inspections shall verify the installation of these features in accordance with the plan. Re~po~.~ible Monitoring Party City of Temecula Public Works Department Prerequisite Action(s) For Submittal of the plan to the City for re~,iew and approval. Initiating construction of the project. City Verification 45 Genoral Impact The project may mug signifimnt air pollutant emissiom during operatiom. Mitigstion M--gure 4.2.3.12 Provide incentives for tour buses, sad once roar buses have dropped off patrons, these buses slmll not be allowed to idle more than five minilies before they m-e shut down. SIXci~c Process The applicant shall a list of incentives that will be used to attract bus tom. When buses enter mandatory parking areas they shall be notified of the requirement to shutdown within 5 minutes or face revocation of the privilege of serving the facilities. " Monitoring during operations to verify that the bus shutdown requirement has been implemented as identified in the plan. Miti?ation Milestone The copy of the list shall be filed with the City prior to initiating operation of any facilities. Random inspections by the City at least one time per week shall verify the 5 minute shutdown requirement is being met by tour buses. Respon.~ible Monitoring Party City of Temecula Planning Department Prerequisite Actionf s) For Submittal of the list and notification to the City for review and approval. Initiating project operations for tour buses. City Verification 46 Genera! Inlpact The project may cause significant air pollumnt emissions during operations. Mitigation M~.~urc 4.2.3.13 The applicants shall provide at least one day-care facility for employees working for the hotel and emer~-inme,. complex facilities. This facility can be provided on site or arrangements can be rode with an offsite professional day _~n_re provider(s) to meet the day-care needs of up to 2,400 employees. Specific Process The applicant shall a idemify in writing the location and verify the availability of the day-care facility to the City. The availability of day-care facilities shall be Verified at least one time per year by the owners of the facilities. Mitigation Milestone The copy of the written identification shall be filed with the City prior to initiating operation of any facilities. Random inspections by the City at least one time per year shall verify the availability of this facility to facility employees. Responsible Monitoring Pnrty City of Temecula Planning Department Prerequisite Actionfs~ For Submittal of the idemification and notification to the City for review and retention. Initiating facility operations. City Verification 47 General ImDa~t The project may cause significant air po!iutant emissions durin~ operations. Mit~fion M,maure 4.2.3.14 Hotel and ead~*~|~ facility employees shall be provided with transit information and the applicant slmll submit and implement an approved ride share p,o~ra- for permanent ,~pioyees. Specific Process The applicant shall submit a copy of the uznsit information and ride share program to the City for review and approval. The Average Vehicle Ridership (AVR) target shall be identified in this information package submitted to the City. "' lvionitoring during operation to verify that AVR is being fulfilled shall be submitted by the facility operators and independendy verified by the City. Mitigation Milestone The copy of the information and program package shall be filed with the City prior to initiating any operating activities in support of the project. During operations the facility operators shall submit AVR verification at least one time per quarter and City inspections shall independently verify the AVR at least one time per year. Re4pon.~ible Monitoring Par~;y City of Temecula Planning Departmere Prerequisite Actionfs~' For Submittal of the information and program package to the City for review and approval. Initiating facility ol~rations- City Vcri~r~tion 48 General Impact The project may cause significant air poilutant emissions during operations. Mitifation bg'~-~ure 4~.3.15 The applicant or City sixall purchase clean fuel trams for trm,~q3orting people Specific Process "' The applicant shall identify the rams that will be used for transporting people and verify that these vehicles qualify as low emission or no emission (electric) vchicles. Mitigation Milestone The copy of the ram information shall be filed with the City prior to initiating an)' operating activities in support of the project. Re~po~!e Monitoring Party City of Temecula Planning Deparunent Prerequisite Actionf s) For Submittal of the tram information to the City fo.r review and retemion. Initiating facility operations. City Verification 49 General lnlpact The project may muse significant air po!iutant emissions during operations. Mitigation M~ure 4.2.3.16 Provide preferential parking for car and van pools for employees., Specific Process The applicant shall identify the location of preferred parking areas for employee car and van- pools in a submittal to the City. Moniwring during operation to verify that preferred parking area is retained for use by employee car and van pools. Mitigation Milestone The copy of the preferred parking information shall be filed with the City prior to initiating any operating activities in support of the projea, .. Monitoring shall be conducted one time per year. Reiponsible Monitoring Party City of Temecula PIning Deparunent Prerequisite Action(s~ For Submittal of the preferred parking information to the City for review and retention, Initiating facility operations. City Verification 5O General ImlP~t Loss of significant biological habitat that suppore listed or sensitive species. Mitigation M,,m~ure 4.3.3.1 Durina all construction periods wi, hh and/or adjacent to .sensitive wildrife habitat (Cimmise Cimparral, Coastal Sage Scrub, or Riparian/Wetland), the applicant shall provide temporary fencing at the boundary between areas to be disturbed/graded and areas to remain undisturbed. In areas where fencing is not possible, the' appficant shall survey and mark construction area boundaries and shall retain a quaHf'ed biologist with authority to stop construction activity when it construction extends beyond these boundaries. Any disturbances outside of d~ignnted areaS' of disturbance shah be restored to comparable habitat quality of the adjacent undisturbed habitat. Specific Process The applicant shall identify the location of temporary fencing on grading plans submitted to the City for review and approval. Qualified biological monitor shall be identified to the City for onsite monitoring in areas where fencing cannot be installed to minimize habitat disturbance. As built grading plan submitted to City to verify that habitat is not unnecessarily destroyed and to identify arcas that will require restoration, if any. Mitigation Milestone The grading plan sh~ll be submir, ed to the city for review and approval prior to disturbing any native habitat. City notified of qualified biological monitor that will be used for the project, if necessm'y, prior to disturbing any native habitat. As build grading plan submitted to the City which shall include identification of any areas requiring reswration and the method of restoration, prior to initiating operations and release of bonds. Re4ponsible Moniwring Party City of Temecula Public Works and/or Building and Safety Departments 51 Prerequisite Actionfs~ For Submittal of the grading plan to the City for review and approval. Submittal of the as built plan to the City for review and approval. City Verification 52 General Impact Loss of significant biological hnbimt ~ supports listed or sensitive species. Mitiiration M-~ure 4.3.3.2 Construction activities st the Western Bypass crossing over Murrieta Creek shall be limited to daylight hours until the bridge is completed, except in an emergeu~ as defined by the City. Specific Process This requirement shnJl be included in the contra~ with the bridge builder which shall include a work schedule demonstrating the bridge can be constructed using daylight hours only. The builder shall be required to report any deviations from the schedule to the City. The City shall monitor construction activity at the Western By-pass bridge and verify compliance with this requirement Mitigation Milestone Submittal of the bridge contract for review and retention prior to initiating consl~uction. Monitoring shall occur during routine inspections during construction of the bridge. Responsible Monitoring Par~v City of Teme~ula Public Works Department Prerequisite Actionfs~ For Submitnil of the conti~act to the City for review and retention. Initiating construction of the bridge. Ci~ Verification M'~stinn Mmmre 4.3.3.3 ~ ~t'a4nl' re'eros and mare routes shall avoid semirive wildlife ms szec ic that avoid sensitive wildlife ateas. Such azems/zool~ may be located in areas wbete ~~ will eliminate sensitive ~ areas for which m~g~tion/comlx~tution has been provided. .-. mutes rare in.es!!~ as shown on the drawings. Miti""""""""~fion Milestone, Monitoring shall ~ dating routine inspections of ti~ ongoing consmK2ion a~tivity. ~nsiblc Mon~ti~g l~q~ City of Temeutla planning and Pubtic Works Departments Prerequisite ActlnnflJ For Submittal of the drawings to the City for review and atppmval. Initiating construction aclivi~. Cil~, Verification General lmp~ Loss of significant biological habi~t that supports listed or sensitive species. Mitigation M~'~-~ure 4.:5.3.4 Specific Pro~ess Construellon personnel will be ed--a+ed by a qualified biologist regarding .proper behavior when working near. wildlife areas. Information, in the form of reading material and/or onsite training, will addr~___ such issues as wildlife harassment, trespass, and protocols to deal with wiidllfe encoumered during construction. A construction personnel education program will be submitted .to the City for review and approval. This shall include the name of the qualified biologist and any written materials made available m construction personnel. After receiving any insn'uction and reviewing information provided, each construction employee shall sign a statement indicating he/she has participate~! in the program. A copy of signed. statements shall be provided to the City along with a list of construction personnel. Miti_~ation Milestone Submittal of the education program for review and approval prior m initiating construction. Submittal of the list of employees and signed statements as they are generated by the contractor. Re~on~ible Monitoring Pnr~v City of Temecula Planning and/or Public Works Departments Prerequisite Actionf s) For Submittal of the education program to the City for review and approval. Initiating construction activity. Citw Verification 55 General Irnl~sa~ Loss of significant biological habitat that suppore listed or sensitive species. Midgetion M~ure 4.3.3.5 AJ! construction debris, such as food litter, will be collected and placed in wildlife*proof containers each day. All..refuse receptacles shall have tiSht-fittinS Dds to p. t VCdt wildlife access. ~eci~c Process This measure refers to trash generated by construction employees. The contractor shall identify the type of refuse receptacles and where they will be located at the construction site in a submittal w the City. The City shall approve they type of refuse receptacle. The City shall monitor construction activity w verify that refuse is collected and stored in appropriate refuse receptacles. Mitifation Milestone Submittal of the information for review and approval prior to initiating construction. Moniwring shall occur during routine inspections of the ongoing construction activity. Respora~ible Monitorir~ par~ City of Temecula Public Works and/or Building and Safety Departments Prerequisite Actionis) For Submittal of the information to the City for review and approval. Initiating construction activity. City Verification 56 4__3"3.6 To preva~ fi2e ions of any Southwestern Pond Turtles during construction~ theapplicntsha!iretaina~bb~tocobctnyturfies within the Western Bypass bridge h ~ construction area. The biologist shall also orenee in~-li,~-jon of batTja's ~o In*event turtles from occupying..the consthroWn area during active eoush dC~On in the dt-nnel. The applicant shall hind m*in, en*nce of the turtles, ff required, until they can be returned to Murrjata Creek following construction..- specific Process The applicant shall submit a untie conection, barrier creation and mninR.~snce pinn, including The City sh,.. monitor construction activity to verify that the plan has been implem~e~l by the Mitigation Mil~stone Submittal of the plnn for xeview and approval prior to ~ constnwtion of the Western By- pass bridge. Monitoring shnll occur during routine in~tions of the ongoing construction activity. Reiponsible Monitoring Parly City of Temecula Planning and Public Works Depm'tments ~ Actionf s) For Submitutl of the plan to the City for review and approval. Initiating construction activity. City Verification General Impact Loss of significant biological habitat that supports listed or sensitive species. Mitigation 4.3.3.7 To offset the loss of 6~.6 acres of oeeupied Gnnte~teher habitat in the Chamise Chaparral and Coastal ~age ~rub plant communities within the project area the applicant shall implement one of the foRowing measures: a) Aequire 97 acres of high quality Gn,,te~eher habitat (1.5:1 ratio ~ on diseussiom with U. S. Fmh and Wildlife Staff) and transfer ownership of the !and or open spaee easements (which prevent any future use other than open space) and management responsibility for the property to the Riverside County Parks Delmrmaent or other gem aeceptable to the U. S. Fish and W'dd!ffe Service and Department of Fish and Game. This habitat shah be purchased W~hin the SaHta Rosa Phiteau/Sallta ]Vlargarjta River Potentja] Reserve area as identified within the Riverside County "Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan", or at a location acceptable to the U. S. Fash and WHdlife Service and Department of Fish and Game. An endowtnent of $~0,000 shall be provided for use by the d~sigsanted management agen~ ..to enhance wildlife carrying capacity of the 97 acres set aside as mitigation'for this project; or b) pay fees as determined through negotiations with the U. S. Fash and WHdlife Service and State Department of Fash and Game to an agent authorized by these two agencies for purchase of land-banked compensation habitat. Specific Process The applicant shall submit verification from the Deparunent of Fish and Game or the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service that it has implemented mitigation acceptable to thes. e agencies for the loss of the 64.6 acres of .occupied Gnatcatcher habitat prior to breaking ground for the Westside Specific Plan development. Mitigation Milestone Submittal of the verification prior to disturbing the 64.6 acres of habitat. Re:fpop~ible Monitorin~ pnrty City of Temecula Planning Department 58 Prerequisite Action(s) For Completion of negotiations with the wildlife regulatory agencies prior to submitting verification to the City. City Verification 59 General lmpn~-t Loss of significant biological habim~ that suppens listed or sensitive species. Mitigation M~ure 4.3.3.8 To offset the loss of up to one acre of Riparian/Wetland habitat in Murrieta Creek, the applicant shall develop two acres of Riparian/Wetland habitat or habitat improvements in the Immea|,,e Irel of the Western Bypass bridge erossing, or at an alternative location ot~eptabk to the U. S. Fkh and Wildsfie Service and Dqnmns~ of Fish and G-me. The req':uirements of this mensure can be ~ul~ ~ scaled by any alternative mitigation or compensation developed through ncq~ion of a Corps 404 Permit or Deparnnent of Fish and Gnwne 1601/1603 Agreement. The plans for the two aers of Riparian/Wetland enhancement shall be reviewed'and approved by the City, U. S. l~sh and Wildlife Service, and Department of Fish and Game prior to Specific Process The requirements of this measure can be superseded by any alternative mitigatiod or compensation developed through acquisition of a Corps 404 Permit or Depamnent of Fish and Game 1601/1603 Agreement. The plans for the two acres of Riparian/Wetland enhancement shall be reviewed and approved by the City, U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and Department of Fish and Game prior to implementation. The applicant shall submit verification from the Department of Fish and Game or the Corps of Engineen that it has implemented mitigation acceptable to these agencies for the loss of the one acres of wedand habitat in Murrieta Creek prior to disturbing the wetland tmbitat. Mitigation Milestone Submittal of the verification prior to disturbing the - 1 acre of habitat. Responsible Monitoring Party City. of Temecula Public Works and/or Planning Departments Prerequisite Aaion(s} For Completion of negotiations with the stream channel alteration reguiatory agencies prior to submitting verification to the City. City Verification General Impa~-t "'~ Loss of signi~mnt biological habitat that supports listed or sensitive species. Miti~tion M,,~,mre 4.3.3.9 A silt fence or alternative acceptable to the City and San Diego Regional Water (~ Control Board shall be installed downstrum of construction activities in Murrieta Creek to control siltation downstream of the construction site. The performance standard used for this measure shall be sufficient control to prevent d0wllStr~mm siltafion that call cause degradation of the aquatic~riZmrian/wetland hobit°t. Specific Process The applicant shall submit a plan for controlling silmtion downstream of construction activiites in Murrieta Creek to the City and Regional Board for review and approval. The City shall monitor construction activity to verify that the plan has been implemented by the contractor. Mitigation Milestone Submittal of the plan prior to disturbing the Muftieta Creek channel for review and approval. Monitoring shall occur during routine inspections of the ongoing consreaction activity. Responsible Monitoring Party City of Temecula Public Works Departments Prerequisite Action(s1 For Submittal of the silmtion plan to the City and Regional Board for review and approval. Initiating construction activities. City Verification 61 General Impact Loss of significant biological habitat that suppore listed or sensitive species. Mitigation 4.3.3.10 The applicant shall install fenas or othar measm~ to control human access from the Western Bypass to the west, except in Area D of the Westside Specific Plan. The City will require access controls around the boundary of Area D and the adKjaeent wildllfe habitat when this area develops. Specific Process The applicant shall submit a plan for controlling access west of the ..'~Vestern By-pass Road andf west of Area D of the Specific Plan m the City for review and approval. The City shall verify the access controls .have been i~utlled by conducting a field inspection after installation. Mitigation Milestone Submittal of the plan prior m disturbing the Western By-pass Road alignmere for review and approval. Monitoring shall occur prior to authorizing access along the Western By-pass road to the public. Respop~ible Monitoring Par~v City of Tcmccula Public Works Departmere Prerequisite Action(s) For Submittal of the access control plan to the City for review and approval. Completing construction of the road. City Verification 62 Mirigstlon M,'aenc 4.3.3.11 The City will impose a eOndDiam Of app, Oval restricting ownership of do 0eg- dogs and eats when apl,,uvds are panted for future residential development within Areas C and D of the Westside Spedfie Plan. The restriction shall apply to all rJw'ne~ec dogs and cats and shall allow ownership of such pnlmok on~ when they can be fully mansled within the individual ~pcci~c Process The City will include a condition that requires all future rent and lease agreements in Areas C and D to restrict the ownership of domestic cats and dogs. A copy of the conditions of approval shall be placed in the project file for retention. Mitiration Milestone ... Developmere of the condition prior to a hc~ring to approve d~ in Areas C and O. Copy of the conditions of ~ placed in project file when a land use enri~,,~ment is granted for Areas C and D by the City. ~nsiblc Monitoring par(y City of Temecula Planning Department Prerequisite Action(~ For Submittal of an application to develop Areas C and D. Approval of a development in Areas C and D. City Ve'nfi~tion General Impact Loss of significln~ biological habi~ dm~ supin'is iis~d or sensitive species. Mitigstion M---~ure 4.3.3.12 The applicant shall pay any additional SKR fees, ff required, for developing the property wllhln the fee area. Specific Process ' Th~ Cit~ wfil include writran vaification from th~ Count~ that fees have been paid, if necessary. Mitigation Milestone The fees shall be paid prior to disturbin~ an), ~TOund within the SKR fee area. Rqpor~-~ible Monitorinl, l~y Cit~ of Temeculs Plannin~ Deparunent Prerequisite Actionfs~ For Determination that a fee is required and payment of the fee. City Verification General Impact Significant construction noise levels may affea sensitive residential areas east of the Westside Specific Plan Area. Mitignion M,'~.~ure 4.4.4.1 The City shall require nil construction equipment that generates more than SO dB to have sound attenuation devices (mufflers, etc. ) that meet current standards and that axe fully functional at nil times the equipment is .being operated at the construction site. Specific Process The epplieant shall submit a copy of all construction contracts with' this requirement identified in the contract and the method of compliance by the contractor identified. Monitoring during construction to verify that construction equipment noise attenuation devices are in place and functioning properly. Mitigation Milestone A copy of the contract shall be provided to the City prior to initiating any construction. During construction inspections equipment noise operating dam shall be provided to the City at least one time per month to verify compliance with this requirement. Responsible Monitoring Party City of Temecula Public Works and/or Building and Safety Departments Prerequisite Action(s) For Approval of construction plans for specific projects. Initiating construction activities. City Verification General lmlP~ Significant construction noise levels may affect sensitive ruidential arm east of the Westside Specific Plan Area. Mitigation M~,~ure 4.4.4.2 Except during an emesse, acx ms determined by the City, construction activities shall be limited to the hours between 7 a.m. and 7 p.m, ,artless the City is pies-reed with evidence that the noise generated by construction will be less than ex4e6nE baciqround or ambient noise levels. Specific Process The applicant shall submit a copy of all construction contracts with' this requirement identified in the contract and the method of compliance by the contractor identified. Monitoring during construction to verify that consuucfion equipment is operated only between 7 a.m. and 7 p.m., unless otherwise shown not to be required. Mitigation Milestone A copy of the contract shall be provided to the City prior to initiating any construction. During construction inspections the City shall monitor work periods to verify compliance with this requirement. Reapon.~ible Monitoring P. rty City of Temecula Building and Safety Department Prerequisite Actionf s) 1/:or Approval of consuuction plans for specific projects. Initiating construction activities. City Verification 66 General Impact Significant construction noise levels may affect sensitive residential areas east of the Westside Specific Plan Area. Mitigation M~ure 4.4.4.3 If noise complaints are received during eonbmu~on and noise levels exceed acceptable City thresholds, the City shall consider ir~,911otion of temporary noise attenuation walls or sound buffering materials between the noise source and Imr-_eted site. Specific Process The City shall respond m noise complaints by requiring measurement of noise levels from the complainant location. If noise levels exceed City thresholds, the application shall submit a noise attenuation plan prepared by a qualified noise consultant to the City. This plan shall require implementation of the noise attenuation features, including temporary sound walls, unless attenuation below thresholds is not feasible. Monitoring during construction to verify that any noise attenuation requirements are installed and achieve the requisite noise reduction. Mitigation Mileswne City receives complaint and verities that it is legitimate. Noise attenuation plan is submitted to the City for review and approval, before construction activities are allowed to proceed with noise levels exceeding the threshold. During construction inspections the City shall monitor noise levels after attenuation to verify compliance with this requirement. Reipon~ible Monitoring ParW City of Temecula Building and Safety Department Prerequisite Action(s) For Notification of the public of a noise complaint phone number. Noise attenuation plan submitted for City review and approval. Initiating construction activities. 67 Cil;y Veri~tion 68 General Impact Significant operating noise levels may affect sensitive noise receptors. Mitifation 4.4.4.4 Proprietors of individual entertmlnment facilities shall control crowd noise at their fa~illty so that it does not exceed 6~ dB at a distance of ~) feet. Routine or periodic noise monitoring shall be conducted by the owner at least one time per month and the City my request additional noise monitoring at any time, Sl~ci~c Process Noise monitoring data is submittal to the City following the nois~ 'monitoring event for review and action. Mitigation Milestone City receives noise monitoring data within on~ w~]~ of noise measurements. Noise attenuation plan is submiuat to the City for review and approval when noise levels excited 65 dB at distanc~ of 50 fe~t on an ongoing basis. Responsible Monitorin~ City of Tem~ula Polic~ and/or Building and Safety Departments Prer~uisite Action(s1 l:or Noise monitoring is conductt~! by the .pro~rty owner. Noise attenuation plan submittal for City review and approval. City Verification 69 4.4.4j General InK)act Significant operating noise levels may affect sensitive noise receptors. Miti.oation M~'n~ure The City shah establish a noise complaint program when ennstruetion of entetUinment facilities in Old Town begins. This program shah include a point of enntnet, a log of all complaints, and a log of how each complaint is resolved. Si;~,ci~c PTocess Noise complaint program will be prepared by the applicant for ~e Cit~ and plac.~l in oilration. Midiation Milestone The noise complaim program shall be prepared and approval by the Cit~ prior m initiating coasu'uctioa. Noise complaints shall be re~ain~ by the Cit~ and made available to ~e public upon reqU~. Responsible Monitorint Pa~'v Ciw. of Temccula Planning Department Prer~uisim Action(s~ For Noise complaim program is submi~t,d to the Ciw. for review and approval. Noise complaints retain~l over the life. of the project. Ci~ Verification 7O General Impact ~'~ Significant operating noise levels may affect semifive noise receptors. Mitigation M,~ure 4.4.4.6 The City shall require special noise attenuation measures, such as temporary or permanent sound walls or modifications in operations, to control exterior crowd noise to 65 dB at 50 feet in from of entertainment facilities permitted by this project. "' Specific Process Noise attenuation plan is submiued to the City for review and approV. al when noise levels exce.~ 65 dB at distance of 50 feet on an ongoing basis. Mitigation Milestone The noise attenuation plan shall be prepared and approved by the City within two weeks following notification that noise fluesholds are being exceeded. City will monitor the installation of noise attenuation features required by the plan and verify the attenuation is sufficient to meet the threshold. Responsible Monitoring Park-v City of Temecula Building and Safety Department Prerequisite Actionf s) For Noise dam indicates th.at an entertainment facility exceeds this threshol& Plan completed for City review and approval. City verities attenuation meets threshold. City Verification 71 General Iml~et Significant operating noise levels may affect sensitive noise receptors. Mitigation M,-s,.~ure 4.4.4.7 Exterior sound kveis during perforrnonces at Old Town entertainment facilities shall not exceed 65 dB Le at 50 feet from the building. At no time shall noise levels exceed 55 dB I,.e at the nearest sensitive noise receptor. Specific Process Noise levels outside of entertainmere facilities shall be monitored during at least two performances by a qualified noise consultam or acousticjan to dete.rmine exterior noise levels~ If noise levels exceed the threshold, additional noise attenuation shall be installed in accordance with a noise attenuation plan until the threshold is no longer exceeded. Mitigation Milestone Noise levels during performances shall be monitored within one month of opening"an entertainment facility and submitted to the City for review and approval. The noise attenuation plan shall be prepared and approved by the City within two weeks following notification that noise thresholds are being exceeded. City will monitor the installation of noise attenuation features required by the plan and verify the attenuation is sufficient to meet the threshold. Responsible Monitorinl? Party City of Temecu|a Building and Safety Department Prerequisite Actionf s} For Entertainment facility begins performances. Noise dam indicates that an entertainment facility exceeds this threshold. Plan completed for City review and approval. City verities attenuation meets threshold. City Verification 72 General Irr~act Significant operating noise levels may affect sensitive noise receptors. Mitigation M*~.~ure 4.4.4.8 The City shall require that an earth benn or sound attenuation wall and landscaping be in~tolled on the ridge above the houses on PUjol Street to minlmi~e noise levels at the nearest residences. S1;~a:ific Process The sound attenuation feature shall be shown on the gracling/e~onsuuction plans-for the hotel/arena area and documentation of the level of attenuation shall be provided by a qualified noise consultant or acoustician to the City for review and approval'~' Once construction is completed City impectors verify that the attenuation features have been installed and attenuation achieved meets the forecast. Mitigation Milestone Plans and documentation submitted to the City prior to initiating construction of the hotel and The inspection dam, including noise measurements, shall be placed in the project tile within one week of verifying the feature's effectiveness. Responsible Monitoring Party City of Temecula Building and Safety Department Prerequisite Actionfs~ For Plan/documentation submitted to the City for review and approval. City verities attenuation meets threshold. City Verification 7B General Impact Significant operating noise levels may affect sensitive noise receptors. Mitigation M*~urc 4.4.4.9 When the final design of the Arelkll]hotel]parkinE complex is completed, the applicant shall submit a noise study demo~ that noise levels from the complex can be reduced to a CNEL of 62.7 dB at the nearest residence. The noise study my incorporate some or all of the following measures which have been identified to reduce Arena noise to the 62.7 ctB level at residences along Pujol Street. The Arena should be oriented so that any stage faces away from the nearest residential areas.. The rear of the stage house should be no deser than 500 ~ to these sensitive land uses. This along should reduce concert noise levels at the rear of the Arena to 60 dB according to WJHW. The Arena should contain a full s~ house (portable or permanent) with enclosed win~s for flying and rocking of touring sound systems. The house sound system should be designed to minimiTe ellvironmelltai noise. A distributed loudspeaker approach for spectator seating areas should be utilized if required. The Arena "tent" should be constructed of material which has a weight of .75-1.0 !bs/ft2. The rear side of and "bleacher style" seating should be enclosed to provide a barrier around the facility to help control noise. Mixing console noise levels during concerts must be restricted to 100-105 dB maximran. Specific Process The noise study demonstrating noise levels will meet the threshold shall be prepared by a qualified noise consultant or acoustician and submitted to the City for review and approval. Once construction is completed City inspectors verify that the attenuation futures have been installed and attenuation achieved meets the forecast. 74 Mitigation Milestone Documentation submitted to the City prior to initiating hotel and arena operation. The inspection data, including noise measurements, shall be placed in the project file within one week of verifying the design's effectiveness. Re4pomible Monitoring Pnrlat City of Temecula Planning and/or Building and Safety Departments Prerequisite Actionf s) For Documentation submitted to the City for review and approval. City verities attenuation meets threshold. City Verifi,'~tion G~neral lmpagt Significant oilrating noi~ iev~h my affect ~nsitiv~ noi~ re~ptor~. Mitigation M,-~-~ure 4.4.4.10 The City shall require any future residential uses adjacent to the ,Western Bypass Road that place residences within the 6~ dB CNELd, noise contour to ira'taB sound attenuation barriers or walb sulTacieut to reduce noise to a level below this significance threshold. -" Specific Process The City will include a condition implementing the above requirements if and when it approves residential development adjacent to the Western By-pass Road. "' A copy of the conditions of approval shall be placed in the project fiic for retention. Mitifation Milestone Development of the condition prior to a hearing to approve residential development adjacent'to the Western By-pus Road. Copy of the conditions of approval placed in project file when a land use entitlement is granted for such residential development. Responsible Monitorir~ PnrlZy City of Temecula Planning and/or Building and Safety Departments Prerequisite Action(s.~, For Submittal of an application to develop residential uses adjacent to the Western By-pass Road. Approval of a development adjacent to the Western By-pus Road. City Verification General Impact Significant operating noise levels nmy affect sensitive noise receptors. Mitigation M,--~ur~ 4.4.4.11 When noise levels along the Western Bypass Road near existing residences exceeds the City threshold of siflpifie~nce for residential areas (65 dB ~L/L.), the City shall install a sound attenuation wall to reduce noise levels from exceeding this value at the residences. ." Specific Process A contingency for installing a sound attenuation wall in the area of concern shall be included in the road engineering plans and funding. ' A copy of the drawing/funding documents shall be placed in the project file for retemion. Using annual noise measurements or an acceptable noise model and annual traffic counts, the City shall determine when the sound attenuation wall must be constructed and then insudl the wall. Mitigation Mileswne The drnwings and funding commitment shall be made prior to constructing the Western By-pass Road and the documents placed in the project file prior to initiating construction. The City shall conduct annual noise measurements adjacent to the Western By-pass Road during June of each year, on a day when the arena is conducting a performance. Respov.~ible Monitori0f ParO, City of Temecula PIning and Building and Safety Departments Prerequisite Actionis) For Submittal of drawing/funding documents for the Western By-pass Road to the City for retention. Select date for annual monitoring in June each year when an arena performance is scheduled. City Verification 77 C, eneralT~act Loss of an i6e~r,~d park/-~_utlon area due to in~p~.~g the Westside Specific Plan as proposed. Mitig~on 4.S.3.1 The City droll ,tqui, t a modu~c'e'n in the text of the Westside Specific Plan, OF a eOndii~n Of app, oval, requiring the tneh,~t'n Of a neighborhood WSP text ~ shall ,t4ukt the design of the park/facility to be reviewed and approval by the City, Specific Process . A copy of the approved plan with the above moam~,~cm stall be ~ned in the project file. Mitigation The modification must be ~nch~ae,J in the Westaide Specific Phn ~ by the City. City of Temecula Planning and/or Community Services Depsmnents Prerequisite Actionii) l~or Revisions W the Westside Specific Plan for submittal to the City. City Verification 78 Genepl lnl~.a ~ 4.6.4.1 To ndtt*-te 1996 with-p'oJect ch'admbn symm ' F _m.. at the Rncho California Road/I-IS North u.,mps, the folkwing steps mmtbe takem On the westbound ~ app'mdt, widen and/oF restripe Rand~o California Road to pmvide one thzmqh bme dilned with the (ev,naD separateleft- turn lane mt the I-lS South on-ramp, one throulh lane, one optional through/right-turn hme, and one right-turn.lane. In order to accommodate two lanes of right-turning traffic onto the l-l~ North on-ramp, said on-ramp.. will require widening just north of gancho California Road; these two lanes should roetie into one lane, homer, prior to i~t~sectlnf the moinlirC of I- North on-lamp ~ Ix~ r. llmlnate~, however, whal the ~h~o~b~ 'loop* ~l-ramp ultim~t~!y is/novided.) Slx~ci~c Process implementation and funding m.4~- available for their implementa. ou. The City shall verify tlmt these improvements are installed as drown after they are constructed. Mitigation Milestone The drawings and funding shall be in place prior to opening project f~c~ities for operalion. The as built drawings shall be placed in the projea file after completing their in.~n~.on. Retponsibl~ MonitorinE Pa~ City of Tcmecula Pubtic Works Department Drawings must be completed prior m subnfittal to the City. Ci~ Verification 4.6.4.2 To mi,igme 1996 with-pt~ect ciren~-O-~ system Imp-ets at the From Sinrot/Win Bypass Road idtc,_e:t**~ the folbwing steps must be take: On the mmtbomad iat_~a e _-tin ape, 6M.h, Front Street sisall eontain one ..!eft- Street wnl eamad ncmia of the Westma Bylaus Road to Santiago Road as a five- lane fac~ity (two thamsSh lanes per dixection pins a two-way-left-turn lane accord~ to the City), ~is sominmd approach fm~ct~the Wes~n B~ Road) could comain tzee lanes; two left-trim hazs and one fight-ram lane. If this thee-lane sitthrive is implemented, the intcrsection's LOS would be even Specific Process implementation and funding made available for theh' implem,~tion. The City shall verify that these improvements arc instnllod as drawn after they arc constructed. Miti~tion Milestone The drawings and funding shall be in place prior to opening project f~cmti~ for operation. The as built drawings shall be placed in the project file after completing ~ in.~ra!inriOn. ReSponsible Monitoring Party City of Temecula Public Wodcs Depamnent Prerequisite Ac, lonfs~ For Drawings must be completed prior to submiual to the City. Ci~ VeXification 4.6.4.3 repFoduced in Appendix4. Thme~d.,4~'~ fbail be b~~ed as part of ~he propreed projec~ at a time 0e~ea'~ined by the ~ to prevent deteriorafim2 of traf~ flow below LOS D. The slams of the circulation system components addressed in the -~z,,-.....~-.dadom shall be assessed as part of the Clty's ,nn~,,~ traf~ survey and evalnation, .. ~peci~c~ ~ngineefing drawings incorl~ these-improvements shall be pxovided to the City for implementation and funding made avnHnhle for their implem,.m~fiom The City shall verif~ that the~ illlpfovellmll~ are in.~tnlisd as d~awn after they are co~... lvlitit, ation ~.esmnc The drawings and funding shall be in place when the City determines they are needed based on their annual traffic surveys or other studies as al~wpxlate. The as built drawings shall be phcal in the project file after completinff tlzir in.~nlhfiOn. ~sible Monitori,~ ProXy City of Temecuh Public Works Department Prerequisite Action(s~ For Drawings must be completed prior to submittal to the City. City Verification 81 4.6.4.4 The City shall nquire insPn-~n of tramit foenm~s at emtnliml locations wifi~n Old Town and the hold/atom emnpl~ The C'ity shall work with Riverside County Tramit Afenq to provide m'viee to these lotadorn in the implememation. Miti#a~on Mil~e The drawings and funding shall be in place prier to opening project facilities for opexmion. The as built drawings shall be placed in tho project file afro- completing their in~li,tlon. Re,~ponsible Monitoring hrty City of Temecuh Public Works and/or Planning Depamnents PrereqUisite Aelion(~ For Drawings must be complaed prior to submired to the City. CRy Verification 82 4.6.4.5 The CIty shall ,4uhc-fairshare fbn'unr as descrii~ in the Congestion Manapnm Plan Tn~ bnp-e~ Aua!ysk for the seimed improvement at the Rancho California Road/I-IS Southhnmd ramp. This fading can be provided where -nn~pl triglie ~trveyl Indjllite a ~ for the road improvements. Then are three alternatives available to the ~ to mtfi,p~en signifmm~ traffic flow Impe~ at these ramps. They are: wide the Rancho California Road bridge on the south side to pccommedate an. pddtfiomd eastbound thru~ hne; eoush act a so .~bound loop on-ramp in the northwest quadrant of the ~ construct a now southbound off- The City shall verify fiat these impmvemems arc installod when required and place as-built drawings ins the file after they are constructed. Mitiration Milestone- The funding shall be identified prior to inltiatinE operation of any project fac~ities and the funding shall be in in place when zequixed by the City. The as bufit drawings shall be placed in tl~ project file after completing their in,~ralbtiOn. Rciponsible Monitoring Psrty City of Temecula Public Works Department ~isitc Action(sl For Drawings must be completed pdor to submittal to the City. C~ Vorifi~--tlon 83 C~-ncnl TnTl~ Mit~tion 4.6.4.6 theat~R?)Seo~andthel-lSNodlabomad~ps. This funding cau be provided where annnnl 'traffic mu,,:a inds-pte a need for the road modified to incktk !nvidmm for a double left turn confiim. ation at the off- ramp apt,-6r .4a to SR 79 South. R was also * ~e_ L _-mded that the ultimate isitenian~ lutl,,ov,uent plans include a ~ for three eastbound specific Proccu The City shall verify that ~ improvements are intoned when required and place as-tmilt drawings ing the file after they are constructed. Mitigation Milestone The funding shall be identified prior to i,~.;nfiQg opention of any project fac~'!iti~s and the funding shall be in in place when i~lulrcd by the City. Thc as built drawings shall be placed in the project file after completing tleir instnnntlon. City of Tctnecula Public Works Dcpa~mcnt Pr~reqpisite Actionfl) For Drawings must be completed prior to submittal to the City. Ci~ Vetiris. on 4.6.4.7 The C3iy dudl..~)~& hir-dmre f~ 41el as descrg2d in the Congestion Managenero Plan IYafflc Tmp-ct Analysk fw the ,gPeded' improvanent at provided whe rnma~! ~ sutv,~:s inda°J, tea need for the read imp, o,~ _-,ds. At the Sit 79 South and 1-15 Southbound ramps, adequate mid_a~uq ,alui,~ ~ of a new mudsbound loop off-ramp in the southwest quadrant of the izd~dmnge. Impimneming this measure would... require relocTfinE the southbound on-ramp across from the terrninqs of Froill Street where it intersects the Westam Bypass Road. The City shall verify that these improvemores are in,,rnned when requited and place as-built drawings ing the file after they are constructed. Mi~Fation Milestone The funding shall be identified prior to initiadng operation Of any project facilities and the funding shah be in inpUge whenmuiz~ by me City. The as built drawings shall be placed in the project file alter completing their in,ranation. Re;ponsible MonitnriqE Psq3 City of Temecuh Public Works Depaxtment Prerequisite Action(s~ For Drawings must be compleU~ prior to submittal to the City. City Verification Genml Impa 4.6.4.7 provided whm anmml traffic am,~:a In41-m,e a nml for the road imp, or. ~. At the SR 79 Smzth and I-1~ Soulhbound ramps, adequate mDlpliOn r~uh'es cmlstrm:lkn d a new southbound loop off-ramp in the southwest quadrant of the iutmrdmn[~ lmpi-~---,dln_* this measure would require rdocatin~ the mmthbound on-ramp acrms f.~m the terminus of Front Street where it intersects the Wereturn Bypass Road. specific Process Fair-share fimding mtuilemea~ shall be identified and tie City shall idcaitify when funds will have to be pwvided to suppon the impmvesuems depesiem utxm this fair sham-funding. ,.-. The City shall ver~ that these improvements are in.ealle.d wh~ required and place as-built drawings inS the file afmr they are constructed. Miti~tion Mi!~stou~ The funding stud1 be identified prior to initiMing operation of any project fa~liti~ and th~ funding slmtl be in in place witfit recluized by the City. The as built drawings shall be placed in the project file after completing their in,ean~tlon. ~nsible Moni,~ring ~ City of Temecula Public Works Department Pmmq~ite Actionf s) For Drawings must be completed prior to submittal to the City. Cil~, Verification 86 Pol3r~!znl sigw~i~ic'~nt vismtl imp-cts have been forecast to occur at a few lo~fi~ within the commnnlty. Mbig~"on M,~-mre 4.7.S.1 Slope grading technjqmm on the slope facing Pujol Street shall aim to blend with the esisting mmn~ of the topography. Grading tee4anlques shall anph~s4~e slope conic-wing including codtom -n~,!oHOn and variable slopes. tn-dd~oq, tops and toes ofslopm dm!lbe roundetL Hard edges and angles are to be avoided. Slopes shall be ,at=~n_::d to e--~hly blend with renmininf~ specific Process City for wv'iew and approval. The City shag verify that the grading is compktee in accordance with the gnding phn by l~4iti~tion 1V[ilestone The gnding plan shall be subznitted for wview and approval prior to initjnting construction on this slope. The as built drawings shall be placed in the project file aft~ completing their installation. ~nsible Monltori~ City of Temecula Public Works Del3artment ~isite Actlon(s~ For Cn2din~ plan prepax~ and submitted to the City for wview and l:~rawings must be completed prior to subxnittal to the City. Ci~ Veri~,-~tion General Impact COmmnnit~o with project devdopnmat. T onf~caping shall be natural in appearance and linear arradm. -mt, a of t?n.'-c v, ping are to be avoided. Copies of the landscaping plan ~ the above sched,,le and !sncJs~ping tcchni.oucs shall be provided to the City for xeview and atVroval. The City shall verify that the b,~~ has been completed in accordance with the plan by verifying it with field inspecri~ dlxring construction and when completed. Th~ as built clz~wiz~-~ ~ ID~ place! in ti~ pz~l~t fii~ ~ c~)mpi~n~ ~ in,~ll~tinu. 88 putatial significant visual inxpp~ havo Zmax forecast to occur at a ft'w ~ within the community. ~ifi'p~on M~mm 4.7.5.3 Visible repininf walb over eight feet in height slmll be avoided unless Copies of the ~ndsc'~.ng plan inco-l.~o~afing th: any visib~ re~inlng walls ov~ ~ight feet in The Cit~ ~ ve~'y that such re~,i-~.~ wall(s) has/bav~ bccn comple~ in accordan~ wit!~ the ~,ndsc~ning plan by verifying it with field in~-c~ions dming oonsm~ion and when oompleted. Mitigation Mi!~tnn-- The landscaping plan shall be subu~l for review and approval pxior to inlti~t~ ~msmx~fion on such retninln~ wnll.~. The as built drawings ~hnll be plfuT~! in the project file after complotillg their in.~nlintioll. ~nsible Monitoring 1~ City of Temecula l~lnnning and/or RI,iidinff and Saf~y Depam!lellts PrereqUisite A~ionfs~ For Landscaping plnn prepared and submitted to the City for ~ and approval. Drawings must be ~nnple~ prior to submired to the City. City Verific~ion 4.7.5.4 Uflli~m aimll be in ~tad uad~poqm~L ~lXcafic Procz~ The plnn,~ shall be submilI~ for zeviow and approval ~ to initiating ing~ann~on of UtilitieS. The as built drawings shall be placed in the projea file afU~r completing their in.edlntion. ~nsible MonitorivW par~y City of Temecula Public Works and Building and ~fety DepamnenU The plans prepared and subxniUed to the City for zeview and approval, Drawings must be completed lyfior to sutnniUal to the City, City Verificntion c,--~l Trapact Pov~_nd si~-, visua/i,r~m have been forecast to occur aX s few location wlthl. the cornre--itT. Mit~tlon 4.7.5.5 :Beain[ and-k.~K.~prm.f elaiB be ,~d te coaeed ~ soften Tismd svecm_c ~ Copies of bndsc'Are plans showing measures talma to conceal and soften vinal imlacts of :parlri-gareas sball be provided to the Cit~, for mview and ~. .. ~i~l~sdon ynssm~ The lsndKslpe p]alis Elba[] be ~llbllxilled for l'eview a!ld applx)v~ pfio~ to inltlnti~lg colls/l'tlctioll on the parkinS areas. TIle as blli]t dl'awillg~ sha]] be placed in tile pl~ect fi]c af[~ colBp~ ~ insp-allsltiOIL ~nsible Monitoring Pa~ CiPJ of Temecula Planning Deparnnem Prerequisite Action(s) ~ar Tile plnn.~ pIepaTed and sllblBilled to the ~ for ~ alld applx)vaL Drawings must be complnsd prior m submffial to the City. City Verification 91 .--- Genepl TnT]~c~ 4.83.1 No furt]~ a,,:F-eohfka] Tm,~ is reamammded for this projeer. Howe~r, druid may ]mown or musicted ard,-eoh_~l,-wl mterials be ~ ~d ~ projm de,~ a qaUaai himori~ ardmoLOSist should be confg~ed- Work should be suspended Jn any area where at,~'-eni-~--s runaim are found until they can be properly ewb,-,ed and mlvag~ ff found signiikam. A response program shall be submiU~ for review and approval by the City for implanem:miO.a if any such resources are discovered. Mitigation Milestone The program and name of the ~,sli~,-~l archaeologist shall be submitted for x~wiew and approval prior w initlsring construction at any location for tiffs project. City of Temecula Building and Safety and/or Public Works Depamnents The pl.n,~ ~ and submitted to the City for review and approval. Drawings must be completed prior to submittal to the City. City verification C,-~.mml lm]~et Potential sight hi/ofical mzuctm'e iml~c~ my occur due to impi~aw~ the pr~ 4.8.3.2 Potential project Imp°e~ to historic bn~din~, indgdi~J thee that are not formally ,te~,.,i-4d. will be mitiptml below a kvd of siSmrw°nce ~ impk .. -rotation of the provisiom already t~ined m~Jtftll the OTSP O/d Town H/gor/c Pru~pa~ ~ On//nan~. Thin provisions allow for conditions of app, oval for C_Aa~eatm of Historic Appropr~otene~. 'it is , t~ .... ,~ ~mdml that eondifions of approval for dsmomlon or aimration of any historie b-ndh~_ in~tn60 appropriate .historical and ~ dc_-mento~on prior to modification of the bugdMi. .- established by the State Office of Histoxic Preservation. The fhmliT~l documen~__~on for any such historic strucUffc shall be submitted City for xcvi~ and approval. Mitigation Milestone The documentation shall be initiated prior tO any di,qlffbance Of a himofic structure and completed within six months of the initial disturbance of the structure. ~nsible MonitorlnE Par~y Ci~ Of Temecula phnnlng Deparmlent . Prere~isite ActionG) For A decision to impact a historic mcture. The documentation must be completed prior to submiUal to the Cit~. City Verification 93 ATTACHMENT NO. 2 RESOLUTION NO. 95- WESTSIDE SPECIFIC PLAN AND CHANGE OF ZONE R:\FORMS~%'TAFFRPT.CC 8/7/96 Idb 11 ATTACHMENT NO. 2 RESOLUTION NO. A RF,~LUTION OF Tm?~ CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY OF 'r~IECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 9S-0003 (WESTSIDE SPECIFIC H2uN) AND CHANGING THE ZONE FROM R-A- 20 (RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL- TWENTY ACRE MINIMUM PARCEt. SI~I) TO S-P (SPECIFIC PLAN) ON PROPERTY GENERAl .l .y LOCATED WEST OF PUJOL STIfiw-T, EAST OF ~ CTrY'S WESTERN BORDER SOUTH OF I~mGE PARK DRIVE, AND KNOWN AS ASSF, SSOR'S pARCEt, NUMBERS 940-310-013, 940-320-(M}1, 940-320-002, 940-320-003, 940-320-004, 940-320-005, 940-320-006 AND 940-320-007 WHEREAS, Hancock Develepmm Comply filed Planning Application No. 95-0003 in accordance with the City of Temecula C_,enend plan and Riverside County T ~nd Use and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference; WIn~AS, Planning Application No. 95-0003 was processed in the time and manner. prescribed by SUite and local hw; WITEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application No. 95-0003 on May 15, 1995, at a duly noticed public heating as in'escxib~ by hw, at which time intexeged persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or in opposition; WIn~I~AS, the planning Commission continued Planning Application No. 95-0003 at their meeting on May 15, 1995 to June 5, 1995; WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons deserving to be heard, the Commi.~sion considered all facts relating to Planning Application No. 95-0003 and recommended approval to the City Council; WRER.EAS, the City Council considered plsnning Application No. 95-0003 on June 13, 1995, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time in~ persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or in opposition; NOW, THEuKsORE, TRF. CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY OF TEM~CULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOIJ-OWS: Section 1. That the above recitatiom are true and correct. Section 2. Findings. The City Council in al~proving Planning Application No. 95-0003, makes the following findings, to wit: R:\FORI~RSX$TAFFRPT.CC 6/7/95 Idb 12 C-eneral Phn Specific Plan Area Oveniay. The CsnmJPlaurequires: 'in areas identified as Specific Plan Overlay, with an aggnsple area of 100 or more acres, approval of a specific plan is requL, ed prior to approval of any ~ land use cntltlement or isstmncc of any building or grading permit. " l~uther, the Genend Plankey objectives forthis Specific Plan Area are to: "provide complementary land usss to Old Town that incnsase ths vi~,Hty of the ansa and to increase the range of housing oppommifis west of I-15." The Westside Spedfi'c Plan contains Approximately 67.4 gross acres of the slopes west of the Wesmm Bypass Con'idor (WestSide Parkway), east of the City Limit will r~snain in an open space 6e~ignstlon, with no development proposed on the site. 6oal 5 of the Open Space/ConservMien n~ement of the City's Genenl plan calls for 'Consertafion of open space areas for a knlnnce of recantion, scenic enjoyment, and protection of natural resources and features.' 2. The project is consistent with Government Code Section 65450. The Specific Plan contains the information required under Article 8 of the Government Code, and meets the intent of the Specific Plan as deftned by state law. 3. The project will result in the construction of Genend Plan Roads and other infxaslmcm~. The Western Bypass Corridor is identified in the General Plan as the "Westside Parkway," a Secondary Highway. First Street is also identified in the Ciro_dation Plan as a Principal Collector. The certified Final Ellvironmental Impact Repolt and subsequent development proposals for this project will require that the portions of these wads that will be affected by thi.~ project be built as mitigation for the project. Additional infrastructure improvements including, but not limited to, storm drain improvements, water and sewer improvements, and other utilities will need to be completed as part of this project. 4. The project, as conditioned, will have adequate access. The Circulation Plan within the Westside Specific Plan provides vehicular access to the project site from the Western Bypass Corridor (Westside Parkway), Vincent Moraga Drive and First Street. Pedestrian access is provided throughout the project site, along the projects' roads, as well as from Main Street. Additional access to the site shall be by transit service. 5. The project is compatible with surrounding land uses. The Specific Plan contains adequate provisions that will buffer sensitive uses from non-sensitive uses. 6. Said findings are supported by analysis, maps, exhibits, and environmenial documents associated with this application and herein incorporated by reference. a. As conditioned pursuant to Section 4, Phnning Application No. 95-0003, as proposed, is compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community. R:\FORMS'~'TAFFIMrr. CC 6/7m5 Idb 13 Section 3. l~onmental Corqpliance. T!~ City of. Temecul~_ City Council hereby certi~ the FHR (Planning Application No. 95-0031), adopts Findings of Fact anti Sl~ements of Overriding Considexntion and approves of the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the Old Town l/Roltail!~ent Project which includes the Westaide Specific Plan ~ subsequetg development pro~ within tiffs area. Seelion 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecatla City Counct hereby approves planning Application No. 954)003 to change the zoning on 154.1 acres of land from R-A-20 (Residential Agricultural - Twenty Acre Minimum Parcel Size) to Specific Plan on property generally located west of Pujol Street, east of the City of Temecula's Westexn border, south of Ridge Park Drive and known as Assessor's Parcel Numlgn 940-310-013, 940-320-001, 940- 320-002, 940-320-003,940-320004, 940-3204)05,940-320-(X)6 and 940-320-007 subject to the following conditions: A. Exhibit A, attached hereto. Section S. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 13th day of June, 1995. ATTEST: Jeffx~ E. Stone, Mayor June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CAL~ORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CXTY OF TEMBCULA) I mmRRy clm-rxFxr that the foregoing Reso~on was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 13th day of.June, 1995 by the following vote of the Council: AYP~: NOES: ABSENT: CITY COUNCH.MBiBERS: CFFY COUNCK,MEMBERS: CITY COUNCrr-Mgv[B~: R:\FORMSX~TAFFIIrr.CC 8/7/95 Idb June S. Greek, City Clerk 14 EXHIBIT A CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 95-0003 (WESTSIDE SPECIFIC PLAN) R:\FOR~AFFRPT.CC 6/'7/95 klb 15 EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Al:~icadon No. 95-0003- Westside Specific Plan Project Descdpljon: A Specific Plan containing ebt five planning area ranging in size from 2.8 gross acres to 67.4 gross acres. Within the Specific Plan there are five (5) land use designations that correspond to the planning ares. Assessor's Parcel Numbers: 940-310-013, 940-320-001,940-320-002, 940-320- 003, 940-320-004, 940-320-005,940-320-006 and 940-320407 Approval Date: Expiration Date: PLANNING DEPARTMENT General Requirements The developer/applicant shell indemnify, protect, defend, and hold harmless, the City and any agency or instrumentality thereof, and/or any of its officers, employees and agents from any and all claims, actions, or proceedings against the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its officers, employees and agents, to attack, set aside, void, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting from an approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Westside Specific Plan which action is brought within the appropriate statute of limitations period and Public Resources Code, Division 13, Chapter 4 (Section 21000 9.1; sea., including but not by the way of limitations Section 21152 and 21167). City shall promptly notify the developer/applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding brought within this time period. City shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. Should the City fail to either promptly notify or cooperate fully, developer/applicant shall not, thereafter be responsible to indemnify, defend, protect, or hold harmless the City, any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its officers, employees, or agents. The project and all subsequent projects within this site shall comply with all mitigation measures identified within Planning Application No. 95-0031 (Old Town RedeVelopment Project Environmental Impact Report). During all construction periods within and/or adjacent to sensitive wildlife habitat (Chamise Chaparral, Coastal Sage Scrub, or Riparian/Wetland), the applicant shall provide temporary fencing at the boundary between areas to be disturbed/graded and areas to remain undisturbed. In areas where fencing is not possible, the applicant shall survey and mark construction area boundaries and shall retain a qualified biologist with authority to stop construction activity when it construction extends beyond these boundaries. Any disturbances outside of designated areas of disturbance shall be restored to comparable habitat quality of the adjacent undisturbed habitat. R:\FORMS%STAFFRPT.CC 6/7/95 Idb 16 Construction activities at the Western Bypass crossing over Murrieta Creek shall be limited to daylight hours until the bridge is completed, except in an emergency as defined by the City. e Ownership of domestic dogs and cats for residential development within Areas C t;) (Deleted at the Planning Commission hearing on June 5, 1995) of the Westside Specific Plan shall be restricted. The restriction shall apply to all domestic dogs and cats and shall allow ownership of such animals only when they can be .fully managed within the individual residence. Transit facilities shall be installed at centralized locations within Old Town and :the hotel/arena complex. The City shall work with regional transit agencies to provide service to these locations in the future when such transit service becomes available. Prior to the second reading of the Ordinance Amending the Zoning Map of the City of Temecula, a preliminary grading plan shall he approved by ..the Planning Commission (Added at the Planning Commission headng on June 5, 1995). The applicant shall provide a pedestrian linkage from the Westside Spedtic Plan to the Old Town Entertainment Project area. This linkage shall be consistent with the streetscape designs in the Old Town Spedtic Plan anti will address such items as lighting, landscaping and possible security anti sound walls to mitigate impacts to surrounding residential uses. This linkage plan shall he submitted with the first development plan (Added at the Planning Commission headng on June 5, 1995). Prior to the Issuance of Grading Permits e To offset the loss of 64.6 acres of occupied Gnatcatcher habitat in the Chamise Chaparral and Coastal Sage Scrub plant communities within the project area the applicant shall implement one of the following measures: a) Acquire 97 acres of high quality Gnatcatcher habitat (1.5:1 ratio based on discussions with U. S. Fish and Wildlife Staff) and transfer ownership of the land or open space easements (which prevent any future use other than open space) and management responsibility for the property to the Riverside County Parks Department or other agent acceptable to the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Department of Fish and Game. This habitat shall be purchased within the Santa Rosa Plateau/Santa Margarits River Potential Reserve area as identified within the Riverside County 'Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan', or at a location acceptable to the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Department of Fish and Game. An endowment of $50,000 shall be provided for use by the designated management agency to enhance wildlife carrying capacity of the 97 acres set aside as mitigation for this project; or b) pay fees as determined through negotiations with the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service and State Department of Fish and Game to an agent authorized by these two agencies for purchase of land-banked compensation habitat. 10. To offset the loss of up to one acre of Riparian/Wetland habitat in Murrieta Creek, the applicant shall develop two acres of Riparian/Wetland habitat or habitat improvements in the immediate area of the Western Bypass bridge crossing, or at an alternative location acceptable to the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Department of Fish and Game. The requirements of this measure can be superseded by any alternative R:\FOItVIS~frAFFRFr. CC 6/7/95 Idb 17 11. 12. 13. mitigation or compensation developed through acquisition of a Corps 404 Permit or Department of Fish and Game 160111603Agreement. The plans for the two acres of Riperian/Wetiand enhancement shall be reviewed and approved by the City, U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and Department of Fish and Game prior to implementation. A silt fence or alternative acceptable to the City and San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board shall be installed downstream of construction activities in Murrieta Creek to control siltation downstream of the construction site. The performance standard used for this measure shall be sufficient control to prevent downstream siltation that can cause degradation of the aquatic/riparianlwetiand habitat. The applicant shall install fences or other measures to control human access from the Western Bypass to the west, oxoopt in Argo D of tho Wootoide Spooifio Plan. Tho City will roquiro agoggo oontrolo around tho boundary of Argo D and tho odjooont wildlifo habitat whon thio argo dovololxk (Daleted at the Ranring Commission bearing on June 6, 1995). .. The applicant shall comply with Ordinance No. 663 by paying the fee required by that ordinance which is based on (the gross acreage of the parcels proposed for development). Should Ordinance No. 663 be superseded by the provisions of a Habitat Conservation Plan prior to the payment of the fees required by Ordinance No. 663, the applicant shall pay the fee required under the Habitat Conservation Plan as implemented by County ordinance or resolution. -' 14. An earth berm or sound attenuation wall and landscaping be installed on the ridge above the houses on Pujol Street to minimize noise levels at the nearest residences. 15. Slope grading techniques on the slope facing Pujol Street shall aim to blend with the existing nature of the topography. Grading techniques shall emphasize slope contouring including contour undulation and variable slopes. In addition, tops and toes of slopes shall be rounded. Hard edges and angles are to be avoided. Slopes shall be designed to smoothly blend with remaining existing topography. 16. Grading on the slope edge facing Pujol Street shall be revegetated or landscaped immediately upon completion of' grading activities, concurrent with project development. Landscaping shall be natural in appearance and linear arrangements of landscaping are to be avoided. Prior to the Issuance of Building Permits 17. A landscape plan shall be completed for review and approval by the Director of Planning. This plan shall provide for full revegetation of the Western Bypass and First Street cut slopes utilizing native/ornamental plants which will serve as a fire buffer area. On the constructed building pads, the landscape plan shall include the planting of large trees (minimum 4" diameter) immediately after construction of the pads is completed. The effect of the revegetation plan will be to blend the slopes into the natural coastal sage scrub and chamisal chaparral communities west of the Western Bypass Road. The revegetation goal for the pads will be to visually screen and soften the effect of the flat, graded and paved pads. R:~FORMS~qTAFFFFr. CC 8/7/95 klb 18 All landscaped areas shall be irrigated in a manner that does not result in overland flows of surface water and the discharge of fertilizer and paaticide contaminated surface runoff toI Murrieta Creek. The landscape designs and irrigation systems shell be reviewed to verify runoff contrds are adequate to prevent inadvertent surface runoff. 19. Along the west and east aides of the Weetam Bypass Corridor, a fire and vegetation management plan shall'be prepared and submitted to the Planning Department, RCFD, and CDF for review and approval. This plan shall provide a sufficient buffer of fire retardant plantinge to ensure that structures on the east side of the road are not exposed to wildland fire hazards from a fire in the chaparral on the west side of:the road. 20. Residential uses adjacent to the Western Bypass Road that place residences within the 65 dB CNEL,. noise contour shall install sound attenuation barriers or walls sufficient to reduce noise to a level below this significance threshold... Prior to the Issuance of Certificates of Occupancy 21. Berming and landscaping shall be employed to conceal and soften visual impacts of parking areas. 22. A bond or equivalent commitment, as provided by City ordinance, shall be provided by the developer to ensure that all cut slopes can be revegetated after grading. 23. The applicant shall provide at least one day-care facility for employees working for the hotel and entertainment complex facilities. This facility can be provided on site or arrangements can be made with an offsite professional day-care provider(s) to meet the day-care needs of up to 2,400 employees. 24. Preferential parking shall be provided for car and van pools for employees. A plan illustrating preferential parking spaces shall be submitted to and approved by the Director of Planning. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS The following are the Department of Public Works Conditions of Approval for the Westside Specific Plan. All questions regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the appropriate staff person of the Department of Public Works. General Conditions 25. All utility systems such as electric, including those which provide direct service to the project site and/or currently exist along public rights-of-ways adjacent to the site (except electrical lines rated 33 kv or greater), gas, telephone, water, sewer, and cable TV shall be placed underground, with easements provided as required, and designed and constructed in accordance with City Codes end the utility provider. R:%FOIRIVlS~"TAFFRP'T.CC 6/7/95 klb 1 g 26. 27. Prior to the issuance of any grading permit, as deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall consult with the State of California Department of Fish and Game, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers~ and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to determine if permits or approvals are necessary from such agencies for any action contemplated by this proposal. Such consultation shall be in writing, and copies of said correspondence, including responses from agencies, shall be submitted to the City. Where appropriate, the terms, conditions, and recommendations of the noted agencies shall be incorporated .as Conditions of Approval into the areas of development, Prior to issuance of building permits for the various phases of development, the Developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities imposed upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public facility mitigation as required under the Environmental Impact Report (EIR)/Negative Declaration for the project. The fee to be paid shall be in the amount in effect at the time of payment of the fee. If an interim or final public facility mitigation fee or district has not been finally established by the date on which the Developer requests its building permit for the project or any phase thereof, the Developer shall execute the Agreement for payment of Public Facility Fee. Concurrently, with executing this Agreement, the Developer shall post a bond to secure payment of the Public Facility Fee. The amount of the bond shall be $2.00 per square foot, not to exceed $10,000.The Developer understands that said agreement may require the payment of fees in excess of those now estimated (assuming benefit to the project in the amount of such fees). By execution of this Agreement, the Developer will waive any right to protest the provisions of this condition, of this Agreement, the formation of any traffic impact fee district, or the process, levy, or collection of any traffic mitigation or traffic impact fee for this project; orovided that the Developer is not waiving its right to protest the reasonableness of any traffic impact fee, and the amount thereof. 28. Landscaping and permanent irrigation facilities shall be installed with street improvements. Perimeter walls if constructed shall be treated with graffiti-resistant coating and shall be installed adjacent to street improvements within each phase. 29. A phasing plan addressing the schedule of necessary infrastructure requirements shall be approved by the Department of Public Works and the Planning Director prior to approval of any subsequent development application. 30. The Developer shall pay off any remaining assessment balance(s) or reapportion the remaining assessment(s) for any Financing District including the property based on the proposed specific plan. Circulation 31. As a condition of approval for any subsequent development application associated with this Specific Plan, the Developer must enter into an agreement with the City for a "Trip Reduction Plan' in accordance with Ordinance No. 93-01. 32. Adequate primary and secondary access shall be provided for each phase of development as approved by the Department of Public Works. Access to the sites shall be reviewed by the Department of Public Works at the time of submittal of individual development applications. R:\FORMS~JTAFFRPT.CC 6/7/95 klb 20 34. 35. 36. All street sections shall correspond with Typical Roadway Cross Sections and requirements of the Circulation Element of City's General Plan, City ordinances, standards, or as subsequently recommended in the Old Town Redevelopment Project Traffic Studies. All intersection intervals shell comply with City and Caltrane standards and requirements. Accesses proposed from Western Bypass Corridor, First Street, and Vincent Moraga Drive to the site are conditional upon Director of Public Work's approval. The Developer shall provide bus bays and shelters within the Specific Plan. Location and number of bus bays shall be subject to approval of the City and Riverside Transportation Agency (RTA). If required additional rights-of-way dedications associated with bus bays shall be provided by the Developer. Necessary improvements have been/will be conditioned based on mitigation measures" identified in the Old Town Redevelopment Project Environmental Impact Report and associated studies and as required by public/utility agencies. Any substantive changes to phasing of the development must be approved by the Planning Commission through a phasing application. A phasing of the development considered to be minor or in substantial conformance with the construction phasing plan approved with the adoption of the Westside Specific Plan, as determined by the Department of Public Works and the Planning Director, may be approved administratively through applicable City procedures. Prior to the issuance of occupancy permits within any phase, all on and offsite improvements as referred to in the Old Town Redevelopment Project Environmental Impact Report and associated studies and public/utility agencies requirements must be constructed and/or bonded as required by the Department of Public Works. 37. Pursuant to submittal of subsequent development applications associated with the Westside Specific Plan and/or substantive revisions to the proposed phasing plan, ensuing traffic reports, parking studies, and public facilities' analyses determining respective project specific and cumulative impacts identifying implementation responsibilities and the timing of necessary improvements shall be provided. These studies shall be subject to review and the individual project shall be conditioned accordingly and required right-of-way be reserved oo doomod nooofaory by tho Doportmont of Publio Worko (Deleted at the Planning Commission hearing on June 5, 1995). 38. In compliance with the Site Traffic Impact Analysis of the Old Town Redevelopment Project - Phase I, as prepared by Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc., dated October 28, 1994, the following infrastructure improvements shall be completed prior to issuance of any occupancy: Page 40 of the study states that "at the Rancho California Road/Interstate 15 (I-15) north ramps, on the westbound intersection approach, widen and/or restripe Rancho California Road to provide one through lane aligned with the (eventual) separate left turn lane at the I-15 south on-ramp, one through lane, one optional through/right turn lane, and one right turn lane. In order to accommodate two lanes of right turning traffic onto the I-15 north on-ramp, R:\FONS'~q"AR=IRlY'F.CC efi'/96 Idb 21 widening and/or restriping may be required just north of Rancho California Road; these two lanes should merge into one lane, however, prior to intersecting the mainline of I-15 north". Similar widening and/or restriping shall be provided on the eastbound intereectlon approach at the Rancho California Road/Interetate 15 south ramp {Added at the Planning Commission hearing on June 5, 1995), Page 19 of the study states that "at the State Route 79 south (SR79s)II-15 interchanoe, the I-15 north ramp and south ramp intersections with SR79s will be signalized, (and widened to provide additional through and turn lanes)'. The feasibility of ultimate southbound loop improvements and connection with Weatem Bypass Corridor and acquisition/reimbursement agreement for work in excess of project impact shall be explored. The ramp improvements are currently identified in the Engineer's Report for Assessment District 159 and scheduled to begin construction by the end of 1995. {Added at the Planning Commission hearing on June 5, 1995). Page 43 of the study states that "the Western Bvo~ss Corridor (88 feet full width right-of-way) shall be constructed from the I-1 51SR79s interchange to intersect the (proposed) southerly extension of Vincent Moraga Drive (including the bridge crossing over Murrieta Creek, median and parkway improvements, sidewalks, and street lights). Between the I-1 51SR79sinterchange and the new bridge over Murrieta Creek, a four lane, divided cross section shall be constructed, thereby providing two through lanes per direction plus a separate left turn lane at major intersections. West of Murrieta Creek to Vincent Moraga Drive, the street section may be reduced to a two lane, divided cross, thereby providing one through lane per direction plus a two way left turn lane and/or a separate left turn lane at major intersections". Page 43 of the study states that "Vincent Moraoa Drive (78 feet full width right-of-way) shall be extended south of its current intersection (existing terminus) with Ridge Park Drive to intersect the Western Bypass (refer to the above item). A two lane, divided cross section shall be constructed, thereby providing one through lane per direction plus a two way left turn lane/or a separate left turn lane at major intersections (including parkway improvements and sidewalks)'. The existing segment of Vincent Moraga Drive to Rancho California Road shall be restriped to accommodate this same street section. Page 43 of the study states that "In relation to the above item, Ridge Park Drive shall form (be reconstructed to form) a "T" intersection with Vincent Moraga Drive". Page 43 of the study indicates that "the Front StrestlSantiaao Road/First Street intersection shall be redesigned to provide a four legged intersection via the removal of the existing First Street east leg of this intersection. The existing First Street east leg shall be "relocsted" and shall operate as a "T" intersection with Front Street between Santiago Road and Second Street". Page 43 of the study states that "Front Street (78 feet full width right-of-way) from the Front Street/Santiago Road/First Street intersection shall be extended west to intersect the Western Bypass Corridor. A four lane, undivided, cross R:\FORMS~TAFFRPT.CC 6/7/96 Idb 22 39. 40. section, thereby providing two through lanes par direction (including a bridge crossing over Murrieta Creek, sidewalk and parkway improvements, and street lights); however, at major intersections, a separate left-turn lane shall also be provided", Page 43 of the study states that "a traffic signal warrant analysis (utilizing criteria established by the State of California Department of Transportation) indicates the Front StreetRVestem Bvoass Corridor intersection shall be signalized. It is recommended, therefore, that traffic volumes be monitored at this location to determine the precise scheduling of this installation. Moreover, when constructed this traffic signal shall be interconnected with the two traffic signals proposed at the I-151SR79s interchange". Page 44 of the study states that "(once the First Street bridge is operational) the existing Main Street bridae over Murrieta Creek may be restricted to pedestrian and local transit circulation". .. · Traffic signals shall be installed at the interse,~on of Vincent Morega Drive and Rancho California Road. Interconnecljon shall be Ixovided from this intersection through the signalized intersection of Diaz and Rancho California Roads to the intersection of Front Street and Rancho California Road (Added at the Planning Cammission hearing on June 5, 1995). **, Sufficient parking and a local transit system shall be provided pursuant to the attached alternative scenarios to satisfy the parking demands of the project in compliance with the Old Town Redevelopment Project Parking Study, prepared by Robert Kahn, John Kain & Associates, Inc., dated February 20, 1995. Certain project related parking and circulation improvements will be implemented with the future develocment of Westside Soecific Plan as identified in the Old Town Redevelopment Project Parking Study, prepared by Robert Khan, John Kain & Associates, Inc., dated February 20, 1995, the Congestion Management Program (CMP) Traffic Impact Analysis of the Old Town Redevelopment Project, prepared by Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc., dated October 28, 1994, and the General Plan Build Out Traffic Impact Study of the Old Town Redevelopment Project, prepared by Wilbur Smith Associates, dated March 1995. Pursuant to submittal of subsequent development applications associated with the Westside Specific Plan, ensuing traffic reports, parking studies, and public facilities' analyses determining respective project specific and cumulative impacts identifying implementation responsibilities and the timing of necessary improvements shall be provided. These studies shall be subject to review and the individual project shall be conditioned accordingly and required right-of- way be reserved as deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works. The mitigations optlone to bo oonoidorod (deleted at Planning Commission at June 5, 1995 bearing) are as follows: Page 35 of the CMP analysis specifies the Extension of Puiol Street southerly to intersect Western Bypass Corridor. R:~FORMS~"TAFFRPT,CC 6tilgE klb 23 41. 42. Page 35 of the CMP analysis specifies improvements to the I-15/Rancho Califomie Road interchanne. The improvements may include "a "loop" on ramp accommodating eastbound to northbound movements". Page 4 of the General Ran Build Out traffic analysis recommends "widening of the Rancho Califomia Road bridne (on the south side) to accommodate an additional eastbound through lane". Page 5 of the General Plan Build Out traffic analysis recommends "construction of a southbound loop on ramp in the northwest quadrant of the I-15/Rancho California Road interchanoe". Page 5 of the General Plan Build Out traffic analysis recommends 'construction of a new southbound off ramp at Santiago Road' (as an alternative). Page 5 of the General Plan Build Out traffic analysis re.Commends improvements to the I-15/SR79sinterchange. The improvements may include widening SR79s to accommodate additional vehicular turning movements and/or an southbound loop off ramp in the southwest quadrant of the interchange. Page 35 of the CMP analysis states that "a realignment of Diaz Road north of Rancho CalifOrnia Road and the realignment of Puiol Street/Felix Valdez Street to make Diaz Road/Felix Valdez Street/Pujol Street a continuous north-south route may be implemented". Alternatively, a realignment of Diez Road north of Rancho California Road to align with Vincent Moraga Drive shall be studied. Page 35 of the CMP analysis states that 'Sixth Street may be extended westerly to intersect Pujol Street. This would require a bridge crossing over Murrieta Creek". Provision of adequately sized parking lots in compliance with the Old Town Specific Plan at locations specified in the Old Town Redevelopment Project Parking Study to satisfy the parking demands. Page 35 of the CMP analysis states that "some form of people-mover system (local transit system) shall be provided along Main Street between Front Street (on the east) and the Arena (on the west). This could include a theme related shuttle system, funicular transit system, horse-drawn carts, or an actual pedestrian people-mover. In addition, as necessary, provision of some sort of shuttle system during periods of peak activity to transport patrons to/from parking facilities potentially located on the periphery of the project site'. A signing program shall be developed on I-15 which directs Project traffic to the SR79s interchange. A Trip Reduction Plan shall be developed which includes local/internal traffic circulation and parking requirements of the Project. This plan shall address both vehicular and pedestrian circulation, including the Project's proposed people-mover and shuttle systems. R:\FORMS~TAFFRPT,CC 6/7/95 Idb 24 Supplemental oneire focused traffic studies shell be required to analyze access, stacking, an~l local circulation issues associated with more definitive development applications shall be submitted prior to subsequent approvals. The Developer is responsible to dedicate all necessary right-of-way for the construction of the infrastructure improvements within and/or adjacent to the Westside Specific Plan including but not limited to the Western Bypass Corridor, First Street, and Vincent Moraga Drive. 45. In the event that an Assessment District is not formed for the construction of the Western Bypass Corridor and Vincent Moraga Drive, half-width plus one 18-foot lane off site street improvements shall be constructed within dedicated rights-of-way as directed by the Department of Public Works. Signalization, acceleration/deceleration lanes and additional intersection improvements shall also be provided as directed by the Department of Public Works. Bonds may be posted in lieu of construction. Drainage 46. Drainage and flood control facilities shall be provided in accordance with the requirements of the City and/or Riverside County Rood Control and Water Conservation District (RCFC&WCD). 47. Prior to approval of any subsequent development applications, the Developer shall submit the master drainage plan and hydrology/hydraulic reports analyzing adequacy of the proposed and existing downstream drainage facilities including the proposed retention design to the Department of Public Works and RCFC&WCD for approval. Pursuant to subsequent development applications, the created runoff and drainage impacts shall be analyzed and necessary mitigation measures shall be implemented. 48. Drainage facilities within each phase shall be constructed immediately after the completion of the site grading and prior to or concurrently with the initial site development within that phase. 49. All drainage facilities shall be designed to carry 100 year storm flows pursuant to current City and RCFC&WCD standards, subject to the approval of the Department of Public Works and RCFC&WCD, as applicable. 50. The Developer shall construct the proposed on and offsite drainage facility improvements and detention basin provision pursuant to the master drainage plan and/or as directed by the Department of Public Works and RCFC&WCD, as applicable. 51. The Developer shall accept and properly dispose of all off-site drainage flowing onto or through the site. 52. The Developer shall protect downstream properties from damages caused by alteration of the drainage patterns; i.e., concentration or diversion of flow. Protection shall be provided by constructing adequate drainage facilities, including enlarging existing facilities or by securing drainage easements. R:~FORMS~rAFFRFT.CC 6/7/95 Idb 25 Water and Sewer 53. A master water plan shall be reviewed and approved by Rancho California Water District (RCWD) and the City prior to approval of subsequent development applications. Specific mitigation requirements shall be conditioned of the project at that time. Water facilities shall be installed in accordance with the requirements and specifications of RCWD and the City. 54. A master sewer plan shall be reviewed and approved by Easter Municipal Water District (EMWD) and the City prior to approval of subsequent development applications. Specific mitigation requirements shall be conditioned of the project at that time. Sewer facilities shall be installed in accordance with the requirements and specifications of EMWD and the City. 55. Prior to approval of any subsequent development applications or recordation of any subsequent maps, or issuance of building permit, the DevelOper shall provide the City with evidence that adequate wastewater treatment facilities are being provided to meet the needs of the Westside Specific Plan development. Grading 56. No grading shall be permitted for any development area prior to subsequent development application approval. 57. Grading plans and operations shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City Grading Standards, the recommendations contained in the Geotechnical Report, or any subsequent reports prepared for the project, the conditions of the grading permit, and accepted grading construction practices and the recommendations and standards specified in the Specific Plan and Environmental Impact Report (EIR) document. 58. Prior to issuance of any grading permit, Erosion Control plans shall be prepared in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works. The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and erosion control improvements. 59. The Developer shall comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit regulated by the State Water Resources Control Board, and the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) implemented by the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board. 60. Each subsequent application for a phase of development shall include a conceptual grading plan to indicate at a minimum: · Preliminary quantity estimates for grading, Techniques and methods which will be used to prevent erosion and sedimentation during and after the grading process in compliance with the City Standards and NPDES requirements. R:\FORMS~STAFFRPT.CC 6/7/96 Idb 26 · Preliminary pad and roadway elevations. · Designation of the borrow or stockpile site location for import/export material. Approximate time frames for development including the identification of areas which will be graded during the rainy months. · Hydrology and hydraulic concerns and mitigations. 61. Major grading activities shall be scheduled during the dry season wherever possible, or as otherwise approved by the Department of Public Works. .. 62. Soils stabilization, which may include revegetation of graded areas, shall occur within 30 days of final grading activities as directed by the Department of Public Works. 63. 64. The site shall be watered during grading operations to control dust. Temporary drainage and sediment control devices shall be installed pursuant to the approved erosion control plan or as directed by the Department of Public Works. 65. An import/export route shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works prior to issuance of any grading permit. The plan shall include limitation to the duration of the grading operation and construction activities, a Traffic Control Plan, and a daily time schedule of operations. 66. Prior to issuance of any grading permit, a soils reports shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval, to address engineering, geologic, seismic, and soils engineering concerns for each tentative map or plot plan for each phase of proposed development. 67. All public streets shall be maintained and cleaned if necessary on a daily basis during grading operation and construction activities. Cash deposit, letter of credit or posting of bond to guarantee maintenance of all public rights-of-way affected by the grading operations and construction activities, shall be posted prior to issuance of grading permits. 68. If subsequent Geotechnical and Soils Reports determine that dewataring of the site is necessary during construction, necessery permits (i.e. in compliance with NPDES permit) shall be obtained from appropriate agencies prior to approval of the grading plans. Phasing 69. Construction of the development permitted by the Specific Plan, including recordation of final subdivision maps, may be carried out in stages provided that, adequate vehicular access is constructed for the proposed land use elements in each stage of development and further provided that such development conforms substantially with the intent and purpose of the Specific Plan. R:~FORMS~TAFFRPT.CC 6/7/95 kib 27 70. Development applications shall be submitted for each planning unit. Total acreage and land uses shall be substantially in accordance with the specifications of the Specific Plan. COMMUNITY $ERVICF~ DEPARTMENT General Requirements 71. 72. 73. Park land dedication requirements shall be determined for Planning Areas C and D in accordance with the Quimby Ordinance for high density residential development. Upon determination of the actual park land dedication requirement, private recreational facilities within the high density residential areas may be entitled to receive a 50% credit towards Quimby. The remaining perk land dedication requirement shall be satisfied through the payment of the equivalent "in-lieu" fees. Quimby requirements shall be satisfied prior to recordation Of each phased map. 74. Exterior slopes and landscaping that are adjacent to commercial/industrial development and multi-family residential development shall be maintained by the property owner or a private property owners' association. 75. Slopes and open space areas within Planning Area F shall be maintained by the developer, the City, or other agency approved by the City. 76. All landscaping shall be installed in conformance with the City of Temecula Landscape Plan Guidelines and Specifications. 77. Class II Bike Lanes shall be provided on site and in conformance with City standards. OTHER AGENCIES 78. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Riverside County Health Department's transmittal dated April 24, 1995, a copy of which is attached. 79. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the County of Riverside Fire Department's letter dated May 10, 1995, a copy of which is attached. 80. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Eastern Municipal Water District transmittal dated May 1, 1995, a copy of which is attached. 81. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Rancho California Water District transmittal dated May 3, 1995, a copy of which is attached. 82. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Riverside Transit Agency transmittal dated May 2, 1995, a copy of which is attached. 83. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Temecula Valley Unified School District transmittal dated April 19, 1995, a copy of which is attached. R:%FORMS~,STAFFRPT.CC 6/7/96 Idb 28 I have read, understand and accept the above Conditions of Approval. Applicant Name R:\FORMS~STAFFRFT.CC 6/7/95 Idb 29 Matthew Fagan City of Temecula Planning Department 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 1825 Third Street P.O. Bo~ 59968 : Riverside, CA 92517 Phone: (909) 6840850 Fax: (909) 684-1007 RE: PA 95-0003 Applicant: Westside Specific Plan and TIM 28011 Hancock Development Company, Inc. RTA staff has reviewed the Westside Specific Plan and the associated tentative map 20811. The project seems to be a logical, complementary extension of Old Town Temecula, including the connection of the Main Street pedestrian thoroughfare and the remote parking. and shuttle service concepts. Currently, RTA Route 23 provides local wansit service in the Old Town area. RTA would like the opportunity to expand bus service as the area develops. We request construction of bus turnouts on the Western By-Pass Corridor, consistent with the standards in the Old Town Temecula Specific Plan. We would like to specify turnout locations at the time of site development,. if possible, so that the bus stops will facilitate the most convenient access. When the site development plan for the Wild West Arena becomes available, we would also like to review the provisions for on-site bus elrcuhtion and the proposed bus parking configuration. RTA bus turnout design guidelines are, enclosed for your .reference. The adjacent bike lane design might work best ~vith ~e S ft. parking or bike lane o,n the We. stern By-Pa~ corrtdor. Please contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, Cis It. Roy Planning Manager enclosures ~k 35 Mr. Matthew Fagan TTM 28011 May 1, 1995 Page 2 The District is currently coordinating with the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District for information regarding the proposed Murrieta Creek Channel and potential =scour depth in the channel. This information is critical to the final District sanitary sewer plan-of-service-to the Westside Specific Plan area. :. Should you have any questions regarding these comment, please feel free to contact me at (909) 925-7676, ext. 4468. Sincerely, Eastern Municipal Water District Kevin L. Crew Senior Cus=omer Service Engineer KnC/cz CC: John Pourkasemi, City of Temecula John Fricker, EMWD J: \WORDPROC',~BUSI. I 1 ~,CI..Z1TFM28011 NaneT K. Huetms LisaD. h St. Vim P.~mbn~ Ralph IL Deily CsabaF, Ko Deue Kuiber8 Michael IL MeNfilth deffmyL, MjnJr. br John F, Hennifar Geueral~meeer Phillip t_ Forbes Director of Finance - Treasu~r r. p. "Bob' Lemons Dlrec~r oF Kenneth C. l~recmt .rO~ermUons & Mmncenmsce PeiTy IL Louck Cont~-~let Li,,4, hL Fr~looo C. Michael Cower Best, Best & Krieler Gesetui C~ums~l May 3, 1995 Mr. Matthew Fagan Assistant Planner City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590-3606 SUBJECT: Westside Specific Plan Dear Mr. Fagan: Rancho California Water District CRCW) has received a copy of the Westside Specific Plan for review. Although we did not receive this document with sufficient time for review and comment prior to the Developmeni Review Committee meeting held on April 27, 199S, our comments follow along the lines of those for the previous Buitnan project. The property is within RCWD boundaries and water service is available upon application for service and payment of the appl opfiate fees. As previously stated in other letters, a hydraulic analysis is needed to properly size the water system x/Oected to serve this project. This analysis and eventual construction of any facilities to be constructed within the Western Bypass needs to be accomplished as soon as posse} so contingent construction can be achieved. Please note that RCWD is the local purveyor of reclaimed water within the City of Temecula (City) boundaries. We have discussed the poss~ility of providing reclaimed water for landscape irrigation purposes along the parkways of the Western Bypass with Mr. Ray Casey of the City's staff. In fact, a 24-inch reclaimed waterline is under design to be constructed within the Western Bypass. Duc to limitations for use of reclaimed water, it will not be available for all irrigation purposes. We suggest that the developer and City staff meet with us to discuss this project and RCWD's requirements. If you should have any questions, please call us. Sincerely, KANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT Steve Brannon, P.E. Development Engineering Manager SB:eb058/F'EG JOhn Hurlbun, Planning & Capital Projects Manager Laurie Williams, Engineering Services Manager Panelm California WaK.' Dis~iet 421::-~ Wincht--h,r li,~.qd * P,,~t Olin' Bt~x .~117 * Tem~¢ula. Calill,rnm .q2.~..eg-.q(llT * 909. ~.76-1101 * F.*X ..~lg,6TB4W~15 deve2opment ph, for land adjacent to open space axeas. 'a fixe l~wtccllon/vegetation managemere pl:n Shrill be Snh...i~CC~l tO the Fn~ Depamnent for a~pwvaL All questions zcg-irding the roetuning Of this conditioln shall be rde~ed to the Pl:~nnln~ 8nd T::nginee-ring Staff. Raymond H. Re~is Chief Fixe Depaxm:~ Planner Eastern }V[unicipal ater District May 1, 1995 Mr. Matthew Fagan, Assistant Planner City of Temecula Planning Department -43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 Re: Westside Specific Plam - Tentative Tract Map No., 28011 Dear Mr. Fagan: We have reviewed the materials transmitted by your office which describe the subject project. Our comments are outlined below: GENERAL It iS our understanding that the subject project is a proposed Specific Plan and Tentative Map No. 28011 comprised of 154.1 acres, located westerly of Pujol Street in the City of Temecula. The Westside Specific Plan proposes a combination of special event commercial areas, high density residential, and hotel uses. The subject project is located within the District's sanitary sewer service area, however, it must be understood the available service capabilities of the District's systems are continually changing due to the occurrence of development within the District and programs of systems improvement. As such, the provision of service will be based upon the detailed plan of service, the timing of the subject project, the status of the District's permit to operate, and the service agreement between the District and the developer of" the subject project. The District has been coordinating with the City of Temecula regarding the project and the Old Town Specific Plan. The information shown on Figure 6 in the Westside Specific draft document does not appear to be complete or in accordance with the expected District requirements for the project. The District requires a plan-of-service for the subject project which should be requested by the applicant and accompanied by a minimum $2,500 deposit for preparation of the plan-of-service. The findings of the plan-of-service for sanitary sewer service to the site shall be incorporated into the Specific Plan document. Ma~ To: P~t Offk~ Box 8300 · Sankd_-m, CaUtom~ 925814~00 · Tek~ ~09) 925-7676 · F= ~09) 92~0257 Lounty of RiverSide DEPARTME~ OF ENVIRO~AL m~.4LTH TO: CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING DEPARTMENT ATTN: Matthew Fagan, .A.t~i.emt Planner ~ jOHN C. SILVA, P.E.,Senior Public Health Eugineer FROM: RE: RECEIVED HAY ~ 2 1995 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 28011 - A NINE PARCEL SUBDMSION - SPECIFIC PLAN FOR 153.1 GROSS ACRES ('Westside Specific Plan) 1;I/,4 7WR/~EIVER: John C. 8ilv*- P.F..- ~nior Pnhllc Tipith l?,:~jneer. l)qp~rtment of ]~,nvironmenfnl hearth The rcfcrcnced tract will require pipe-line utcnsion(s) of the domestic wsk. r and sanitary scwcr system(s). This work would be in conccrt with the Bastera Municipal Water District and Rancho California Water District Whcncvcr possible, the nine lots should try to implement the use of reclaimed water which is irnmcdia~ly adjacent to the proposed project. If you should have any questions r~garding the above, please do not hesitate to contact me. 'S:dr ,909) 275-8980 RIVERSIDE COIYNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT 210 WEST SAN JACINTO AVENUE ,t, PERKIS. CALIFORNIA 925'70 * (909) 657-3183 May 10, 1995 TO: ATTEN: RE: PIANNING DEPAETMENT MA'A-A',-,~Wr FAGAN WESTSIDE S~C P~~3 - P~5~ With rezpect to the x~view and/or approval of the above zfennced doc~ment, the FroI~sed project will have a o,mn~tive impact on the depaxtment's ability to provide an ~le 16v¢1 of s~rvice. These impacts are due to the increased number of emergency or public setrice calls generated by additional buildings and human population. A portion of the impacts associated with capitol improvements or one-time costs such as l~nd, building and eqttip~t can be mitigated by developer par~ipa~n in the fire pn}t~tkm impact mlti~tlon program. However, the annual costs n~.sssry for the ~ed number of ~-~ is only pax~ny off-s~t by the county strut'rare fire tax and would x~lt~re an ~ in the city general fund portion of the Fire depax~...ent's ~nnual operating budget_ Fire protection impam can be mltigmterJ by use of the impact mltilptlcm program and an inezease in tim ~nm,.1 budget. Thezefor, the F'n~ Depaxtment z~:omm~nrJs approval of the' specific plan subject to the following conditions and/or mitigations. All water m~in.~ and fix= hydrants provirl~ xcquix~l fi~ flow .~h~n be constracted in accordance with the appmptL~te sections of O1vlin~nee No. 460 attd/or No 546, subjec~ to approval by the Riverside County Fixc ~ The project pmponent~ shall participa~ in the fire protection impact mi~n program as adopted by the City of Temecula. All tm~dingS shall be constructed with fire retaxdant roofing m~t~-ri~l. Any wood shingles or shak~ shall have a class "B" riling and sh~11 be approved by the Fixc Department prior to in~"~11a~nll ~2} RIVERSIDE OFFICE 3760 12th Strut, Riveni6=, CA 99.501 (909) 272~-4777 · FAX 1909) 369-7451 FIRE PREVENTION DIVISION PLANNING SECTION r-i INDIO OFFICE 79*733 Country Club Drivc. Suite F. !ndio. CA 92201 (619) 863-8886 * FAX (619) 863-7072 W 0 Z ,! 3Z ~'~ c:) : ·mm mmmmm i ~ ~ IIIIIBBB m · Immmmmmmwwmwwwmm: | mm L b 26 TEMECULA VALLEY Unified School District SUPERINTENDENT PSimB. Nevamey. Ed-D- RECEIVED APR 2 5 1995 Bareera Teeker April 19, 1995 Matthew Fagan City of Temeculs Planning Delari,,er~ 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 SUBJECT: Westside Specific Plan Dear Mr. Fagan: The Westside Specific Pin does not address the issue of mitigation for the students generated by the proposed Musing units within the project. The plan calls for between 348 and 538 high density residential units, which will generate between 223 and 344 new students. The District requests you add as a condition of approval that mitigation fees be paid to the District in accordance with the City of Temecula resolution, in the amount to be approved by the City and Temecula Valley Unified School District. ..-. If you have any questions, please call me at 695-7340. Sincerely, Temecula Inified School District .-.~ f / snet Dixon Facilities Planning Analyst cc: Dave Gallaher, Director of Facilities Development 31350 Rancho Vista Road /Ternecula. CA 92592 / (909) 676-2661 ATTACHMENT NO. 3 DRAFT ORDINANCE NO. 95- ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP R:~FOIAIqgRIrroCC 6/7/95 kJb 30 ATrA~ NO. 3 ORDINANCE NO. 95= AN ORDINANCE OF ~ CITY COUNCIL OF ~ C1TY OF TI~fECUI,A, C/kLn?ORN]A, ~ING Tnv. OFFICRL ZONING MAP OF Sam CITY IN TRr- CHANGE OF ZONE APPLICATION CONTAINED IN PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 95-0003, CHANGING ~ ZONE FROM R-A-20 (RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL - TWENTY ACRE MINIMUM PARCh. SFz~) TO S-P (SPECIfiC PLAN) ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED WEST OF PUJOL STI~'-T, EAST OF TRF. CITY'S WESTERN BORDER SOUTH OF RIDGE PARK DRIVE, AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEt. NUMBERS 940-310-013, 940-320-001, 940-320-002, 940-320-003, 940-320-004, 940-320-00S, 940-320-(M)6 AND 940- 320-007 TifF- CITY COUNCIL OF Tin;- CITY OF 'r[3~CULA, STATE OF CALD~ORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Public bcazings have been held before the P]snnin~ Commi.~sion add City Council of the City of Temecuh, Slate of California, pursuant to t~e Planning ~nd Zoning hw of the State of Californln, and the City Code of the City of Temecula. The application ]and use district as shown on the atWched exhibit is hereby approved and ratified as pazt of the Official ],and Use map for the City of Temccula as adopted by the City and as msny be amended hereafter from time to time by the City Council of the City of Temccula, and the City of Temecula Official Zoning Map is amended by placing in affect the zone or zones as ~ in Planning Application No. 95-0003 and in the above title, and as shown on zoning mnp attached hereto and incorporated herein. Section 2. Notice of Adoption. within 10 days after the adoption here~, the City Clerk of the City of Temecula shall certify to the adoption of this ordlrmnce and cause it to be posted in at least three public places in the City. Section 3. Tnlcing Effect. This ordinance shall take effect 30 days after the date of its adoption. Section 4. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordin~mce. The City Clerk shall publish a SUmrnnry Of this Ordinance and a coxrifled copy of the full text of this OiTlltmnce shall be posted in the office of the City Clerk at least five days pdor to the adoption of this Ordinance. Within 15 days from adoption of this Ordinnnce, the City Clerk shall publish a Slimmary Of this Ordhlance, together with the rmmos of the CoBn~'lmembeB voting for and against the Ordinance, and post the same in the office of the City Clerk. R:U=ORMSWrAm~Fr. CC e/7/~s vJb 31 Section $. PASSED, APPROVgD, AND ADOPTam this day of , J~ E. Stone, lVlayor ATTEST: lunc S. Grcok, City Ctr, rk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFO~ COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS C1TYOFT~I~fl~ULA I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do he~ ccrt~ that the foregoing Ordinance No. 95- was duly introduced and placed upon its first _X~mding at a regular meeting of the City Council on the __ day of , 199_, and that thereafter, said ~cc was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of tho City Council of the City of Tcmccula on the __ day of , by the followln~ roll call vote: AYP.,S: NOES: ABSENT: COUNTERS COUNCH ~]~,S COUNCH-I~I]t~IBI~RS June S. Greek, City Clerk R:XFORMS'~'TAFFRPT.CC cryins kib 32 ATTACHMENT NO. 4 RESOLUTION NO. 95- PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 940061 MASTER CONDmONAL USE PERMIT R:%FORMS~"r'AFFRPT,CC 6/7/95 kJb 33 ATrACH1VnoqT NO. 4 RESOL~ON NO. 95- A RESOLUTION OF TFIr~ CITY COUNCIL OF Tn'E CITY OF ~ APPROVING PIANNING APPLICATION NO. 940061 (MASTER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) TO PERMIT CABARET Tm?,&TERS (2), SALOONS (2), AN OPERA HOUSE, TV/RADIO STATION, VIRTUAL RE~I,1TY TFWA,TERS (2), A QUICK DRAW AREA, ADMINISTRATIVE AND TICKET OFFICEs IN AN AIH~A GENEILat,t,Y BOUNDED BY $L~'r~ STI~EET TO Ttt~ NORTH, FIRST STI~E~-T TO T~F, SOUTH, MURBtETA C~EE[ TO TtTE WEsT AND INTERSTATE lsTOTHEEAST ~, TZBG filed Planning Application No. 94-0061 in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Riveaide County Land Use and Subch'vision Ordinauces, which the City has adopted by referrace; WHb;RI?-A~, planning Application No. 94-0061 was processed in the time and martin':. prescribed by State and local law; WIn~RAS, the Planning Commition considered Plannine At~pliCatiOn No. 94-0061 on May 15, 1995, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by hw, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or in opposition; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission continued planning Application No. 940061 at their May 15, 1995 meeting to June 5, 1995; WPb:rt~S, at the public h~rinE, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, ff any, of all persons de,serving to be heard, the Commission considered all facts relating to Planning Application No. 94-0061 and recommended approval to the City CoRneR; .WHERe. AS, the City Council considered planning Application No. 94-0061 on June 13, 1995, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or in opposition; NOW, THER!~,i~ORE, ~ CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY OF TIIVIECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOtJ~)WS: Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct. Section 2. Findings. The City Council, in recommending approval of planning Application No. 940061 makes the following findings: R:~FORMS'~"TAFFRIrr. CC e/TinS klb 34 Planning Application No. 940061 will fa~'l~ development in Old Town Tem~.culn and Goal No. 6 which called for *A Plan for Old Town that enhnnces the economic viability,: design standards to enhance ald :Bni,.~in the clt~rqcter_ am:! economic visbi]iL7 of Old Town." Further, upon ateroyal of the Master CUP, and m~bmlt~l of subsequent development p!nn.~ at specific sites, the plans will be reviewed by the Old Tow. Local Review ~ for comisteoc~ with the Old Town Specific Plan. · A Memorandum of Undea~ndi~ was executed between the City of Temecula and TZBG on January 31, 1995. The Master Con-ditional Use Permit is consistent with this Memorandum of Un~___nd½ng. No development agreement is applicable to this finding. house, TV/radio station, virtual reality theaters (2), a quick draw area, sttmlnlm~ttive and ~ offices. These developments wHl enhance and mnintnin the c~ and economic viability of Old Town, by am'acting patrims and consumers to the areas. 4. The proposed Mast~ Conditional Use Permit is consistent with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings, and structures and that the proposed conditional use will not adversely affect the adjacent uses, building, and structure. Upon approval of the Master CUP, and submittal of subsequent development plans at specific sites, the plans will be x~wicwed by the Old Town Local Review Board for consistency with the Old Town Temecula Specific Plan. This will insure that the project will be consistent with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings, and structures and that the proposed conditional use will not adversely aff. ect the adjacent uses, buildings, and structures. 5. The site for the proposed conditio~ use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, wail.% fences, parting and loading facilities, buffer areas, lnndsc~ping, and other development features prescribed in the zoning ordinance. Upon approval of the Master CUP, and submittal of subsequent development plans at specific sites, the plans will be reviewed by the Old Town Local Review Board for consistency with the Old Town Temecttla Specific Plan. This win insure that the proposed conditi~ use is adequate in size and shape tO accommodate the yards, walis, fences, parking and loading f~ciHties, buffer areas, landscaping, and other development fm prescribed in the Old Town Temecula Specific Plan. 6. The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general weftare of the community. The projea is consistent with the City's General Plan and the Old Town Temecuh Specific Plan. The Final Bnvironmental Impact ~ has been certified and the impacts of the project as laid out have been mitigated. R:~FOIAFFRPT.CC 8/7/96 klb 35 (1) As cont~omt pursuant to Section 4, pi~rm~g Application No. 94-0061 as proposed, conforms to the logical development of its ~xopo~! site, and is compatible with the present and future development of the ,tuo-n,41-~ p~'olx.~ty. Section 3. l~nvironm~m,1 Cow~li.nce. The City of Temec~,l. City Counc~ hen~ certifies ~ (pbm~n~ Application No. 95-0031), adopts Findings of Fact and Statements of Ov_~Ti~ing ~ and approves of the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the Old Town l~n~ellt Project which inchTde~ the :l~[~s~er Conditiorml Use ~ a!:ld subsequent development proposals within the area. Section 4. Condifirm.. That the City of Temecula City Council hereby approves planning Applicatioll No. 940061 to permit cabaret ~ (2), saloons (2), an opera house, TV/radio station, virtual reality theaters (2), a quick draw area, aclmlni.~rative and ticket offices, and a town square/p~ in an area generally bounded by Sixth Street to the north, First Street to the South, Mur~eta Creek to the west and Interstate 15 to the east subject to the following conditions: A. F2ehihit A, attached hereto. R:XFORM~rAI=FIqF'r.CC 6/7/~5 kib 36 Section ~. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED thla 13th day of June, 199~. JefYx~ E. Stone, Mayor ATFF_,ST: June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF C,ALH:~ORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF ~) I n~RF. ny CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temectda at a regular meeting ~, held on the 13th day of June, 1995 by the following vote of the Council: AYP_,S: NOES: ABSENT: CITY COUNCrlLMEMBERS: CITY COUNCrLMEMBERS: CITY COUNCK,MEMBERS: June S. Greek, City Clerk R:\FORMS~TAFFRPT.CC 6/7/96 Idb 37 EXHIBIT A CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 94-0061 (MASTER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) R:\FOFIMS'~qTAFFFFT.CC 6/7/95 Idb 38 EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No. PA94-0061 - Master Conditional Use Permit Project Description: To locate cabaret theaters (2). saloons (2). an opera house. TVIredio station. virtual reality theaters (2). a quick drew area, administrative and ticket offices in the Tot,let Retail Core Designation of the Old Town Temecuia Specific Plan. Approval Date: Expirm~on Date: PLANNING DEPARTMENT General Requirements The use hereby permitted by the approval of Planning Application No. PA94-0061 is for the siting of cabaret theaters (2), saloons (2), an opera house, TViradio station, virtual reality theaters (2), a quick draw area, administrative and ticket offices in the Tourist Retail Core Designation of the Old Town Temecula Specific Plan. .- The developer/applicant shall indemnify, protect, defend, and hold harmless, the City and any agency or instrumentality thereof, and/or any of its officers, employees and agents from any and all claims, actions, or proceedings against the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its officers, employees and agents, to attack, set aside, void, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting from an approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Master Conditional Use Permit which action is brought within the appropriate statute of limitations period and Public Resources Code, Division 13, Chapter 4 (Section 21000 9_1; see., including but not by the way of limitations Section 21152 and 21167). City shall promptly notify the developer/applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding brought within this time period. City shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. Should the City fail to either promptly notify or cooperate fully, developer/applicant shall not, thereafter be responsible to indemnify, defend, protect, or hold harmless the City, any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its officers, employees, or agents. This approval shall be used shall be null and void three (3) years after approval unless the permittee has commenced the conditionally approved usa(s). Commencement of the use(s) shall mean the beginning of substantial construction of the authorized use(s), which construction must thereafter be pursued diligently to completion, or in the case of an existing building, the actual occupancy of the building or land under the terms of the approved permit. R:'%FOFI'~4S~'I'AFI~.CC 6/7/95 Idb 39 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. Prior to the expiration of the Master Conditional Use Permit, the permittee may request an extension of time in which to use the permit. For good cause, two (2) twelve (12) month time extensions may be granted by the City Council.~. The City Council may add additional conditions or requirements to the conditions of approval when approving · time extension. The request for an extension of time shall be made on the forms and in the manner prescribed by the Director of Planning. This Master Conditional Use Permit may not be transferred or assigned without the specific written approval of the City Council. This project and all subsequent projects within this site shall be consistent with .The Old Town Specific Plan. The project and all subsequent projects within this site shall comply with all mitigation measures identified within Planning Application No. 95-0031 (Old Town Redevelopment Project Environmental Impact Report). .. This Master Conditional Use Permit may be revoked upon the findings and procedures contained in Section 18.31 of Ordinance No. 348. The boundary of the Master Conditional Use Permit and specific uses shall conform with Exhibit A, as approved with Planning Application No. PA94-0061, or as amended by these conditions. Subsequent development permits shall be consistent with the conditions identified in this approved Master Conditional Use Permit. During all construction periods within and/or adjacent to sensitive wildlife habitat (Chamise Chaparral, Coastal Sage Scrub~ or Riperian/Wetland), the applicant shall provide temporary fencing at the boundary between areas to be disturbed/graded and areas to remain undisturbed. In areas where fencing is not possible, the applicant shall survey and mark construction area boundaries and shall retain a qualified biologist with authority to stop construction activity when it construction extends beyond these boundaries. Any disturbances outside of designated areas of disturbance shall be restored to comparable habitat quality of the adjacent undisturbed habitat. Construction activities at the Western Bypass crossing over Murrieta Creek shall be limited to daylight hours until the bridge is completed, except in an emergency as defined by the City. Transit facilities shall be installed at centralized locations within Old Town and the hotel/arena complex. The City shall work with regional transit agencies to provide service to these locations in the future when such transit service becomes available. The applicant shall provide a pedestrian linkage from the Weetlde Specffic Plan to the Old Town Emertainment Project area. This linkage shag be consistent with the streetscape deigns in the Old Town Specific Plan and will address such items as lighting, landscaping and pesdble security and sound walls to miligate impacts to surrounding residential uses. This linkage plan shall be submitted wiffi the first development plan (Added at the Planning Commission hearing on June 5, 1995). R:~.FORMS~I'AFFRPT.CC 6/7/95 Idb 40 Prior to the Issuance of a Grading Permit for Each Subsequent Development Proposal 15. The applicant shall comply with Ordinance No. 663 by paying the fee required by that ordinance which is based on (the gross acreage of the parcels proposed for development). Should Ordinance No. 663 be superseded by the provisions of a Habitat Conservation Plan prior to the payment of the fees required by Ordinance No. 663, the applicant shall pay the fee required under the Habitat Conservation Plan as implemented by County ordinance or resolution. : 16. 17. To prevent the loss of any Southwestern Pond Turtles during construction, the applicant shall retain a qualified biologist to collect any turtles within the Western Bypass bridge crossing construction area. The biologist shall also oversee installation of barriers to prevent turtles from occupying the construction area during active construction in the channel. The applicant shall fund maintenance of the turtles, if required, until they can be returned to Murrieta Creek following construction. To offset the loss of 64.6 acres of occupied Gnatcatche~; habitat in the Chamise Chaparral and Coastal Sage Scrub plant communities within the project area the applicant shall implement one of the following measures: a) Acquire 97 acres of high quality Gnatcatcher habitat (1.5:1 ratio based on discussions with U. S. Fish and Wildlife Staff) and transfer ownership of the land or open space easements (which prevent any future use other than open space) and management responsibility for the property to the Riverside County Parks Department or other agent acceptable to the U, S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Department of Fish and Game. This habitat shall be purchased within the Santa Rosa Plateau/Santa Margarita River Potential Reserve area as identified within the Riverside County 'Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan', or at a location acceptable to the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Department of Fish and Game. An endowment of $50,000 shall be provided for use by the designated management agency to enhance wildlife carrying capacity of the 97 acres set aside as mitigation for this project; or b) pay fees as determined through negotiations with the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service and State Department of Fish and Game to an agent authorized by these two agencies for purchase of land-banked compensation habitat. 18. To offset the loss of up to one acre of' Riparian/Wetland habitat in Murriata Creek, the applicant shall develop two acres of Riparian/Wetland habitat or habitat improvements in the immediate area of the Western Bypass bridge crossing, or at an alternative location acceptable to the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Department of Fish and Game. The requirements of this measure can be superseded by any alternative mitigation or compensation developed through acquisition of a Corps 404 Permit or Department of Fish and Game 1601/1603Agreement. The plans for the two acres of Riparian/Wetland enhancement shall be reviewed and approved by the City, U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and Department of Fish and Game prior to implementation. 19. A silt fence or alternative acceptable to the City and San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board shall be installed downstream of construction activities in Murrieta Creek to control siltation downstream of the construction site. The performance standard used for this measure shall be sufficient control to prevent downstream siltation that can cause degradation of the aquatic/riparian/wetland habitat. R:%FORIVlS~TAFFRPT.CC e/7/95 Idb 41 20. The applicant shall install fences or other measures to control human access from the Western Bypass to the west,, axeopt in Area D of the Wootoido ~;pooifio Plan. The City will require oooooo o&qtrolo around the boundcry of Are; D and the odjcoont wildlifo habitat when thio area dovelope, (Deleted at the Planning Commission hearing on June 5, 1995), 21. The applicant shall demonstrate by submittal of a written report that all mitigation measures identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Program have been.satisfied for this stage of the development. Prior to the Issuance of a Building Permit for Each Subsequent Development Proposal 22. Three (3) copies of a Landscaping, Irrigation, and Shading Plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department for approval and shall be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee. The location, number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. 23. The applicant shall demonstrate by submittal of a written report that all mitigation measures identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Program have been satisfied for this stage of the development. Prior to the Issuance of an Occupancy Permit for Each Subsequent Development Proposal 24. An application for signage or a Sign Program shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Director. 25. Roof-mounted equipment shall be inspected to ensure it is shielded from ground view. 26. All landscaped areas shall be planted in accordance with approved landscape, irrigation, and shading plans. 27. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed and be in a condition acceptable to the Director of Planning. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working order. 28. Each parking space reserved for the handicappad shall be identified by a permanently affixed reflectorized sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal, displaying the International Symbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square inches in area and shall be centered at the interior end of the parking space at a minimum height if 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the paring space finished grade, or centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space finished grade, ground, or sidewalk, A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous place, at each entrance to the off-street parking facility, not less than 17 inches by 22 inches, clearly and conspicuously stating the following: "Unauthorized vehicles not displaying distinguishing placards or license plates issued for physically handicappad parsons may be towed away at owner's expense. Towed vehicles may be R:~.FORMS%STAFFRFT.CC 6/"//96 klb 42 reclaimed at or by telephone In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each paring place shell have a surface identification sign duplicating the Symbol of Accessibility in blue paint of at least 3 square feet in size. 29. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Planning to guarantee the installation of plantinge, walls, and fences in accordance with the approved plan, and adequate maintenance of the Planting for one year, shell be filed with the Department of Planning. 30. The applicant shall demonstrate by submittal of a written report that all mitigation measures identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Program have been satisfied for this stage of the development. BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT 31. Conditions of approval will be applied to the project on subsequent development proposals. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT No specific development activities shall be permitted with this Master CUP application unless or until a site specific development permit or plot plan has been reviewed by the Department of Public Works. The specific land uses of the Master CUP as defined in the Old Town Redevelopment Project Environmental Impact Report (EIR) result in mitigation measures as identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Program. Pursuant to the submittal of subsequent development applications associated with the Master CUP, ensuing traffic reports, parking studies, and public facilities' analyses addressing project specific and cumulative impacts identifying implementation responsibilities and the timing of necessary improvements shall be provided. These studies shall be subject to review and individual projects shall be conditioned accordingly. Public rights-of-way shall be reserved as deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works pursuant to the Cities' adopted General Plan, the Old Town Redevelopment Project Environmental Impact Report, and subsequent project specific traffic studies. The Department of Public Works shall review and clear all subsequent development applications associated with the Master CUP prior to issuance of "Subsequent Development Permits" as identified in Item f. of Section 2. of Ordinance No. 94-19. Subsequent development applications shall all be subject to the following requirements: 32. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the prevailing Area Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new development. The charge is payable to the Riverside County Rood Control and Water Conservation District prior to issuance of any permit. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid. 33. All utilities, except electrical lines rated 33kv or greater, shall be installed underground. R:%FORMS~,STAFFRlYT.CC 6/7/95 Idb 43 35. 36. The Developer shall deposit with the Department of Public Works e cash sum as established, per lot/unit/acre, as mitigation towards traffic signal impacts. This development must enter into an agreement with the City for a "Trip Reduction Plan' in accordance with Ordinance No. 93-01. The Developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities imposed upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public facility mitigation as required under the EIR/Negative Declaration for the project. The fee to be paid shall be in the amount in effect at the time of payment of the fee. If an interim or final public facility mitigation fee or district has not been finally established by the date on which the Developer requests its building permit for the project or any phase thereof, the Developer shell execute the Agreement for payment of Public Facility fee, a copy of which has been provided to the Developer. Concurrently, with executing this Agreement, the Developer shall post a bond to secure payment of the Public Facility fee. The amount of the bond shall be e2.00 per square foot, not to exceed $10,000. The Developer understands that said Agreement may require the payment of fees in excess of those now estimated (assuming benefit to the project in the amount of such fees). By execution of this Agreement, the Developer will waive any right to protest the provisions of this Condition, of this Agreement, the formation of any traffic impact fee district, or the process, levy, or collection of any traffic mitigation or traffic impact fee for this project; provided that the Developer is not waiving its right to protest the reasonableness of any traffic impact fee, and the amount thereof. 37. As a condition of approval for any subsequent development application associated with this Specific Plan, the Developer must enter into an agreement with the City for a "Trip Reduction Plan" in accordance with Ordinance No. 93-01. 38. Adequate primary and secondary access shall be provided for each phase of development as approved by the Department of Public Works. Access to the sites shall be reviewed by the Department of Public Works at the time of submittal of individual development applications. 39. All street sections shall correspond with' Typical Roadway Cross Sections and requirements of the Circulation 'Element of City's General Plan, City ordinances, standards, or as subsequently recommended in the Old Town Redevelopment Project Traffic Studies. 40. All intersection intervals shall comply with City and Caltrans standards and requirements. Accesses proposed from Western Bypass Corridor, First Street, and Vincent Moraga Drive to the site are conditional upon Director of Public Work's approval. 41. The Developer shall provide bus bays and shelters within the Specific Plan. Location and number of bus bays shall be subject to approval of the City and Riverside Transportation Agency (RTA). If required additional rights-of-way dedications associated with bus bays shall be provided by the Developer. 42. Necessary improvements have been/will be conditionad based on mitigation measures identified in the Old Town Redevelopment Project Environmental Impact Report and R:%FOI=I4S~AFFIIwT.CC 8/7/95 Idb 44,, 43. 44. associated studies and as required by public/utility agencies. Any substantive changes to phasing of the development must be approved by the Planning Commission through a phasing application. A phasing of the development considered to be minor or in substantial conformance with the construction phasing plan approved with the adoption of the Master CUP, as determined by the Department of Public Works and the Planning Director, may be approved administratively through applicable City procedures. Prior to the issuance of occupancy permits within any phase, all on and offsite improvements as referred to in the Old Town Redevalopment Project Environmental Impact Report and associated studies and public/utility agencies requirements must be constructed and/or bonded as required by the Department of Public Works. : Pursuant to submittal of subsequent development applications associated with the Master CUP and/or substantive redsions to the proposed phasing plan, ensuing traffic reports, parking studies, and public facilities' analyses determining respective project. specific and cumulative impacts identifying implementatio..n responsibilities and the timing of necessary improvements shall be provided, These studies shall be subject to review and the individual project shall be conditioned accordingly and required right-of- way be reserved oo doomod noooooory by tho Doportmont of r~jblio Works {Deleted at the Planning Commition hearing June 5, 1995), In compliance with the Site Traffic Impact Analysis of the Old Town Redevelopment Project - Phase I, as prepared by Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc., dated October 28, 1994, the following infrastructure improvements shall be completed prior to issuance of any occupancy, or oo doomod nooo~3ory by tho Dopartmont of I~ublio Works (Deleted at the Planning Commisdon hearing June 5, 1995). Page 40 of the study states that "at the Rancho California Road/Interstate 15 (I-15) north ramps, on the westbeund intersection approach, widen and/or restripe Rancho California Road to provide one through lane aligned with the (eventual) separate left turn lane at the I-15 south on-ramp, one through lane, one optional through/right turn lane, and one right turn lane. In order to accommodate two lanes of right turning traffic onto the i-15 north on-ramp, widening and/or restriping may be required just north of Rancho California Road; these two lanes should merge into one lane, however, prior to intersecting the mainline of I-15 north". Similar widening and/or reai.-;plng d~eil be prodded on the ee~tbound interm~3tion approach at the Rancho California Road/Interstate 15 south ramp (Added at the Planning Commission hearing on June 5, 1995). Page 19 of the study states that "at the State Route 79 south (SR79s)/I-15 interchanae, the I-15 north ramp and south ramp intersections with SR79s will be signalized, (and widened to prodde additional through and turn lanes)'. The feasibility of ultimate southbound loop improvements and connection with Wastam Bypass Corridor and acquisition/reimbursement agreement for work in excess of project impact shall be explored. The ramp improvements are currently identified in the Engineer's Report for Assessment District 159 and scheduled to begin construction by the end of 1995. (Added at the Planning Commission hearing on June 5, 1995). R:%FO~AFFRPT.CC 6/7/96 klb 45 Page 43 of the study states that "the Western Rvo~ss r-orridor (88 feet full width right-of-way) shall be constructed from the I-15/SR79s interchange to intersect the (proposed) southerly extension of Vincent Moraga Drive (including the bridge crossing over Murriata Creek, median and parkway improvements, sidewalks, and street lights). Between the I-15/SR79s intarchange and the new bridge over Murriata Creek, a four lane, divided cross section shall be constructed, thereby providing two through lanes per direction plus a separate left turn lane at major intersections. West of Murriata Creek to Vincent Moraga Drive, the street section may be reduced to a two lane, divided cross, thereby providing one through lane per direction plus a two way left turn lane and/or a separate left turn lane at major intersections". Page 43 of the study states that "Vincent Moraaa Drive (78 feet full width right-of-way) shall be extended south of its current intersection (existing terminus) with Ridge Park Drive to intersect the Western Bypass (refer to the above item). A two lane, divided cross section shal!' be constructed, thereby providing one through lane par direction plus a two way left turn lane/or a separate left turn lane at major intersections (including parkway improvements and sidewalks)". The existing segment of Vincent Moraga Drive to Rancho California Road shall be restriped to accommodate this same street section. Page 43 of the study states that "In relation to the above item, Ridge Park Drive shall form (be reconstructed to form) a 'T' intersection with Vincent Morege Drive". Page 43 of the study indicates that "the Front Street/Santiaao Road/First Street intersection shall be redesigned to provide a four legged intersection via the removal of the existing First Street east leg of this intersection. The existing First Street east leg shall be "relocated" and shall operate as a "T" intersection with Front Street between Santiago Road and Second Street'. Page 43 of the study states that "Front Street (78 feet full width right-of-way) from the Front Street/Santiago Road/First Street intersection shall be extended west to intersect the Western Bypass Corridor. A four lane, undivided, cross section, thereby providing two through lanes per direction (including a bridge crossing over Murrieta Creek, sidewalk and parkway improvements, and street lights); however, at major intersections, a separate left turn lane shall also be provided". Page 43 of the study states that "a traffic signal warrant analysis (utilizing criteria established by the State of California Department of Transportation) indicates the Front Street/Western Bvoass Corridor intersection shall be signalized. It is recommended, therefore, that traffic volumes be monitored at this location to determine the precise scheduling of this installation. Moreover, when constructed this traffic signal shall be interconnected with the two traffic signals proposed at the I-151SR79s interchange". Page 44 of the study states that "(once the First Street bridge is operational) the existing Main Street bridge over Murrieta Creek may be restricted to pedestrian and local transit circulation". R:\FORMS~STAFFiqPT,CC 6/"//~6 Id~ 46 45. 46. Traffic signals shall be irksts'lcJ at the i,d~ree.-'don of Vincent Moraga Ddve and Rancho California Road. IntuGont~31jon shall be Ixovicled from this intersection through the signalized intersection of Diaz and Rancho California Roads to the intersecljon of Front Street and Rancho Cadifomia Road (Added at the Planning Commission headrag on June 5, 1995). Sufficient paring and a local transit system shall be provided pursuant to the attached alternative scenarios to satisfy the parking demands of the project in compliance with the Old Town Redevelopment Project Parking Study, prepared by Robert Kahn, John Kain & Associates, Inc., dated February 20, 1995. Certain project related parking and circulation improvements will be implemented with the future develooment of Master CUP as identified in the Old Town Redevelopment Project Parking Study, prepared by Robert Khan, John Fain & Associates, Inc., dated February 20, 1995, the Congestion Management Program (CMP) Traffic Impact Analysis of the Old Town Fiedevelopment Project, prepa. red by Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc., dated October 28, 1994, end the General Plan Build Out Traffic Impact Study of the Old Town Redevelopment Project, prepared by Wilbur Smith Associates, dated March 1995. Pursuant to submittal of subsequent development applications associated with the Westside Specific Plan, ensuing traffic reports, parking studies, and public facilities' analyses determining respective project specific and cumulative impacts identifying implementation responsibilities and the timing of necessary improvements shall be provided. These studies shall be subject to review and the individual project shall be conditionad accordingly and required right-of-way be reserved as deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works. The mitigations option to bo ooneidorod (Deleted at the Planning Commission hearing on June 5, 1995) are as follows: Page 35 of the CMP analysis specifies the Extension of Pujol Street southerly to intersect Western Bypass Corridor. Page 35 of the CMP analysis specifies improvements to the 1-15/Rancho California Road interchange. The improvements may include 'a 'loop' on ramp accommodating eastbound to northbound movements". Page 4 of the General Plan Build Out traffic analysis recommends 'widening of the Rancho California Road bridoe (on the south side) to accommodate an additional eastbound through lane'. Page 5 of the General Plan Build Out traffic analysis recommends "construction of a southbound loop on ramp in the northwest quadrant of the I-15/Rancho California Road interchanne". Page 5 of the General Plan Build Out traffic analysis recommends 'construction of a new southbound off ramp at Santiago Road' (as an alternative). R:~FOIAF~-e-i. CC e/7/9~ klb 47 Page 5 of the General Plan Build Out traffic analysis recommends improvements to the I-15/SR79s intercharme. The improvements may include widening SR79s to accommodate additional vehicular turning movements and/or an southbound loop off ramp in the southwest quadrant of the interchange. Page 35 of the CMP analysis states that "a realignment of Diaz Road north of Rancho California Road and the realignment of Pujol Street/Felix Valdez Street to make Diaz Road/Felix Valdez Street/Pujol Street a continuous north-south route may be implemented'. Alternatively, a realignment of Diaz Road north of Rancho California Road to align with Vincent Moraga Drive shall be studied. Page 35 of the CMP analysis states that "Sixth Street may be extended westerly to intersect Pujol Street. This would require a bridge crossing over Muraleta Creek'. Provision of adequately sized parking lots in compl!ance with the Old Town Specific Plan at locations specified in the Old Town Redevelopment Project Parking Study to satisfy the parking demands. Page 35 of the CMP analysis states that "some form of people-mover system (local transit system) shall be provided along Main Street between Front Street (on the east) and the Arena (on the west). This could include a theme related shuttle system, funicular transit system, horse-drawn carts, or an actual pedestrian people-mover. In addition, as necessary, provision of some sort of shuttle system during periods of peak activity to transport patrons to/from parking facilities potentially located on the periphery of the project site". 47. A signing program shall be developed on I-15 which directs Project traffic to the SR79s interchange. 48. A Trip Reduction Plan shall be developed which includes local/internal traffic circulation and parking requirements of the Project. This plan shall address both vehicular and pedestrian circulation, including the Project's proposed people-mover and shuttle systems. 49. Supplemental onsite focused traffic studies shall be required to analyze access, stacking, and local circulation issues associated with more definitive development applications shall be submitted prior to subsequent approvals. 50. The Developer(s) of future plot plan(s) is (are) responsible to dedicate all necessary right-of-way for the construction of the infrastructure improvements within and/or adjacent to the Master CUP. OTHER AGENCIES 51. Water and sewerage disposal facilities shall be installed in accordance with the provisions set forth in the Riverside County Health Department's transmittal dated July 19, 1994, a copy of which is attached. R:%FORMS~STAFFRFT.CC 6/7/95 Idb 48 52. 53. 54. 55. 56. 57. I have Flood protection shall be provided in accordance with the Riverside County Rood Control District's transmittel dated August 15, 1994, a copy of which is attached. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Riverside County Fire Department's transmittel dated April 15, 1995, a copy of which is attached. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Eastern Municipal Water District's transmittel dated July 22, 1994, a copy of which is attached. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Rsncho California Water District's transmittel dated July 18, 1994, e copy of which is attached. .. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the State of California - Department of Transportation's transmittel dated July 25, 1994, a copy of which is attached. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Riverside Transit Agency's transmittel dated July 26, 1994, a copy of which is attached. read, understand and accept the above Conditions of Approval. Applicant Name R:\FORMS%STAFFRPT.CC 6/'/f85 Idb 49 County of Riverside DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH TO: CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING DEPAKTMENT' FROM:/~ ~//O~R DELLENB CH, Euviv..,, ...... a.-d I4,.-M, Spe~ust IV RE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. PA94-0061 CITY OF TEMECULA DATE: July 19, 1994 The DepatUnent ofF. nviro~-~l Hmlth hu reviewed th~ Cosv~mml Use Permit No. PA94-0061 and has no objectiota. Sanitary ssw~r and water servi~es should be available in this area- .. PRIOR TO ANY BUILDING PLAN ~ for ~ clmmn~ th~ following iImas are ~ 2. Three compl~ s~ts of plans for ~ food emb!!~hn~t will bo mbmil2d, ~~ a ~ ~ ~1~, a ~ ~e, ~ a pl~ s~ie h o~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ F~ F~ hw. F~ ~c ~ef~, p~ ~ F~ F~ P~ ~ ~ (909) 358-5172. No ~ i= ~ ~1 ~ ~. I~ ~ ~ ~- U~ offiy 1~ ~h m~ ~ 3. A cl~ 1~ ~ ~ ~ S~ ~ ~ B~ (9~) 358-5055 ~ be r~ ~g ~ ~ pmj~ ~ ~ cl~ ~E a. Underground storage tanks, Ordinanc~ # 617.3. b. H~,~rclous Waste Gmemmr Services, Ordinance # 615.2. c. Hazard, ous Waste Dis~losure (in accordan~e with Ordinance # 651-1)- 4. Waste ReSulatio~ Branch (Waste Colkction/I EA). GD:dr (909) 275-8980 NOTE: KENNETH L EDWARDS RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT RECEIVED AU6 17 '1994 I..dies aqdGentlwTw= The Dinict does nat nommiht r. mc~ ,,,. wrd ,~.~rdlk~ lor Ifd i or ~ ~ t.~ cam it kK, e~,,,,~r d dee. The _h_'__e,~ abe dora m i:dancheckdtylall:lule~lsel, orprovkb Stle Divbk~d F!ed Emamimmmorathw~k:mShazardml~mks'machm Diawic~ oc.,,,~n4a~ri,c. ....endadonatoraudlmaren°nm/yinimdmMtmdspectfiOkmremmmDizwigt~~Mamsr[kldtmppian lacilides, other regional flood control and clrdnap fadDries which oodd be o,.vfzllr.ad a ~ cr,,O~r l.a or extermMn d a reamer p~m r/stem. aftcl Dis~ict Ares Drairap Ran fees (d : ~,dop.,.e.~t ,,ativaam Ira). In addition, bdo,,,ddon d a genial ran b provided. appr~v~r~ndu-~:~hepeq:me~emmpe~m~e~d~'~q~'d~:mb~iched~hmtd~ietyermnye~tm'm~hN: ~-}T~pr~jec~w~u~dmbe~mpw~dbyDimy~Mamw~)rahm~Ptmfadiemmr~mhertw:iti~.~mg~nd~nmmm~p~ F--~Thi~pr~jec~nv~mDLt1dc~M&t.terP~anfad~i~.TheDimr~ctwiac~qxcL.J;ah~fmJchfaci~]6mm~~~.F~ inspection and administmive fees v, dil I~ r~qutmd. ~"""~This projec~ propcss darmeis, storm drains 36 inches or larger in dlmemr, or alher tacii~-s ~ codd be ~--'dwr. ad regional in Mture owner~hipof~jchlacilltiesmwffitenmque~otmCllY- PacililM~rm~llc~t~ "' irtspe~on will be required ~or Distdct -: ~"~: I. Ren Check, iral: ~ _~A ~ r ' ,iri~elife fees will be required. RFNFRAL INFtIR'ATItlN This project ffmy require · Nalienal P~Gutam Discharge Cli,,haen Symem (NPDES) peffffit from the Stme We Rea4a'oms C{xeTol Board. Clearance for gradir~, recordllto~, ~r olher ~ Iprovl, Ihouid m be gtvw~ urll m CIty ha~ ~tr ,,lured etal N I~ject has been ~ · permit or is shown to be exempt. If this project invotves · Federal F.,,.grger',¢y M.-q~g~- ,j:V Agency (FEMA) mapped fioed plain, man h CIty should require m applicw-~ m provide all m, ;,~c ;Iqk-es, plans and othet kie,,,,alkm requimd to meet FEMA~, and Mmdd brlher requim t'~al m aFqtcem obain aCerdeorai Letter ot Map Revision(Cl-OMR)Pd~t°gradng, ra' rdalk~or ob'terfind a;SNvval dm ProJe~end aLetter°f MaP Revision (!.OMR) prk:w to occupancy. ~anaturadw~erc~urse~rma~sad~dp~ain~sim~acadbythispr~jecttheC~yd=ddmquimtheappacann~xaina~1~ RIVE~s RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT 210 WEST SAN .TACIHTO AVENUE · PEIUtXS, C.&v-TF-ORNIA ~ · (909) 6.S7-:3183 1.5, 1995 TO: ATII1~: PLANNING DEPARTMENT :MA:A-A',-s~W~ FAGAN :RE: PA94-0061 .-. With respec~ m ~he conditions of aFpxaval for the abov~ zfinnc~ lyfojcct, the Fix~ D6Inmn~nt recommends th~ following fu~ ~ nzasuz~ be provid~ in acccrrdan~ with City of Tcmccula Ordinanc~e~ mid/or l'e~.,o~ fl~ l:ffot~tio~ stalKlards: All subsequent d~elopment shall be mtuix'ed to meet Fire Safetit x~luL~zn~ats set forth in City of Temecula Ordinances, Local and State Fix~ x~thtions. These zequiz~nents wilX be reviewed when development pl:m.g axe submitrod to th~ City of Temecula. The water mains sb~11 be cai~le of pwvidi-~ a poreaft,1 fn~ flow of 5000 GPM and an actual fie flow av~flnhle fzom any one hydxant Sh~n be 2500 GPM for 2 hour ~,~o- at 20 PSI residual operating pzessu~. Approved super rue hydrams (6"x4x2-2 1/2") shall be located at each street intcnecdon and spaced not mcr~ than 330 feet apaxt in any ~ with no portion of any lot fwnmge moze than 165 feet fzom a hydrant. Applicantdeveloper sb-n furnish one copy of the water plans to the Fize Depsmnent for xedew. t";,-',-~ shall be signed by a r~gistmd civ~ ~g~,',eer, con,: h..~g a Fize De~L,~nt appxoval signam~ block, and shall conform to hydzant type, location, spacing and minimum rite flow. Once the pl~n.~ are signed by the local water company, the ofiLZi~l-q shrill be pzesented W the Fi~ Department for siEwmre. RAYMOND B. RB(HS ChidFix~~Plam~ Fix= Safe~y Sp~sH,~ Easter. Municipal Water District July 7.2, 1994 wm.C,.ad~m, vi=~ RECEIVED" JUt 2 6 ka'L .......... Matthew Fagan~, Assistant Planner City of Temecula PlanninE ]X'pattDlent 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA ~2590 SUIUECT: PA 94=0061 (Old Town Temeeula - Master Conditionnl Use Permit) Dear Mr. Fagan: ' We have reviewed the materials trammittcd by your office which descnte the subject project. Our comments arc outlined below: General It is our understanding the subject project is a proposed "tnaster conditional use permit" for the Old Town area of Temecula. Proposed uses include cabaret theaters, saloons, opera house, TV/radio studio, showboat, wild west arena, virtual reality complex, quick draw competition, visitors center. The subject project is located within the Disu-ict's sanitary sewer service area. However, it must be understood the available service capabilities of the District's systems are contir~j~lly changing due to the occurrence of development within the District and progrnm~ of systems improvement. As such, the provision of service will be based on the detailed plan of service requirements, the timing Of the subject project, the stattis of the District's permit w operate, and the service agreement between the Disu'ict and the developer of the subject project. The developer must arrange for the preparation of a detailed plan of service. The detailed plan of service will indicate the location(s) and size(s) of system improverouts to be made by the developer (or others), and which are considered nec~s.~ry in order to provide adequate levels of service. To an'ange for the preparation of a plan of service, the developer should submit information describing the subject project to the District's Customer Service Deparunent, (909) 766-1810, extension 409, as follows: Mail To: Post Office Box 8300 * SanJacinto, California 92581-8300 · Telephone (909) 925-7676 · Fax (909) 929-0257 Main Office: 2045 & San Jacinto Avenue. SanJscinto · O,~-~- Sen, ice/Fngi>.,,,hg/umeuc 440 Y... O, Ho.-4 Aven~, Hemet, CA Matthew Fagan PA 94-0061 July 22, 1994 Page 2 Wri~n request for a 'plan of service'. Minim,,m $400.00 deposit (larger deposils may be required for extensive development projects or projects locsted in "difficnlt to serve" geographic areas). Plans/maps deseribin~ the enct location and mmre of the subject project. EspeciaUy helpful matedab include grading p sm and phasing p ans. Sanitary Sewer The subject pwject is considered m'bumry to the District's Tetrn~fi~ Valley Regional Water .. Reclamation Facility CI'VR~. "' The District is in the process of evaluati~ the ability of existin[ system facilities to provide service w the proposed wester theme land development. h is likely major system improvements will be necessary in order to pwvide adequate service to the subject development. These improvements are cxpected to include gravity-flow sewer pipelines, sewage lift station, and forcemain. The exact nature of these impwvements cannot be established unffi such time as :.. Specific development locations/sims are reviewed. Other Issues Representatives of the land development projects which would be covered by the subject CUP must contact the District's Customer Service Depaninent to arrange for the following: 1) 2) 3) PIn-of-service Plan Check and field inspection of oreire & offsite facilities Establishment of service accounts and payment of fees Should you have any questions regarding these commentS, please feel free to contact this office at (909) 925-7676, ext. 468. Very tnfly yours, EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT David G. Crosley ~ Senior Engineer Customer Service Deparunent DGC/cz AB 94-596 (wp-ntwk-PA94(1061 .clz) John F. Hennieur lrnillip L. Forb~ E. P. ~ob' Lemons D~rector d Kenneth C. Desly & Ca~n,~llr l,ind~ ~k Dumct Wsllsce R. Pe~k RECEIVED JUL 2 9 Mr. lViatthew Fagan City of Tcmcada Planning Department 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590-3606 Water Availability:. PA94-0061 Master Conditional Use Permit Old Town Redevelopmcnt Project Dear Mr. Fal~n: Please be advised that the above-referenced property is located within the boundaries of Rancho California Water DisTrict CKCWD). Water service, therefore, would be available upon completion of financial arrangements between RCWD and the property owner. Additional on-site and off-site facilities may be required to meet the demands of this redevelopmcnt project- Water availability would be contingent upon the property owner signing an Agency Agreement which assigns water management rights, if any, to RCWI). ff you have any questions, please contact Ms. Senga Doherty. Sincerely, R~u~CHO C.A!.WORN'!A WATER Dt,~TRICT Steve Brannon, P.E. Development Engineering Manager SB:SO:BcO~/F186 cc: Senga Doherty, Engin. eering Technician Planning Department City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 July 25, 1994 Development Review 0S-Riv-15-4.aS+_/4.6S± Your Reference: "' Case No. 94-0061 Master Condition Use Permit Dear Mr. Fagan: Thank you for the opportunity to review the proposed plan for a section of Old Town Temecula located west of Interstate 15 at the above-referenced post miles. ~. We ha~e the following comments to offer: 1. Although the ~raffic generated by this proposal does not appear to have a major effect on the State highway system, consideration must be given to cumulative effect of continued development in this area. It seems this ~only a portion o3 a larger western "Theme" development which has' been proposed here. The whole development on both sides of Murrieta Creek should be considered and reviewed at one time. Consequently, an over all ~raffic study indicating on end off site flow patterns and volumes, probable impacts and proposed miti ation.measures shall be prepared for all developments impacting mainline Interstate 15 (I-15) and the interchange. Care shall be taken when developing this proper~y to preserve and perpetuate the existing drainage pattern of the State highway. Particular consideration should be give to cumulative increased storm runoff to insure that a highway drainage problem is not created. Vehicular access shall not be developed directly to the State highway· It is recognized that there is considerable public concern about noise ~evels adjacent to heavily travelled highways. Land development, in order to be compatible with this concern, may require special noise attenuation measures. Development of this ~roper~y should include any necessary noise attenuatlon if .needed. Mr. Matthew Fagan July 25, 1994 Page 2 We would like to have the items listed below: ae A copy of any conditions of approval or revised approval- Any proposals to further develop this proper%y.. A copy of environmental study. A check print of the plans for any fmprov~ments adjacent to the State highway r~ght of way. A check print of the grading and drainage plans for this proposal when available- 6. When plans are submitted, please conform to the requirements of the attached "Handout-" This will expedite the review process and time required for Plan ~ Check. Please provide to aDDleCant- ;~ Please be advised that this is a conceptual review only. Final approval will be determined during the Encroachment Permit process. Should clarification'or further assistance be required, please call Mr. Ngoc Hoang of our Development Review Section at (909) 3s3-4s30. Very truly yours, G. A.~~~~ Branch Chief, Development Review Attachment %fAll ~F CAUr~FP'*. !: t llAI~I~NtAtlON AND ~ ~ DEPA~(TMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ~j~V. rKP,~ r, Mfom~ e4m (07/20/93) CO J 3t. 2 ,egrt TNq~OnOC'~TON This "Handoute is izxtezlded to pr~ide ~e ~ttee ~d/or ~e ~~e's re~esen~tive(s) wi~ a Zew ~sic ~d~ ~~~ Zor ~e d~i~ ~ t~ical road~y ~rov~en~--- Bd ~ad~g Foposals wi~in ~e ~a~ highway r~ght oZ ~y. It d~s not con~in all ~e desi~ ~it~ia ~at ~y ~ usd in ~e review-oZ a ~eciZic proJe~ nor do~ it contain ~y consideration · c00 Submittal of an application and plans is required from anyone o~her ~han Cal~rans who wish~operformwork in ~he State right of way. c000 ~ Be A fee deposit is required before ~he processing of 'the"' application and plans can occur. Public agencies ere exempt from fees under State Code 6795 however, con- tractors working for a public entity ere not exempt from fees (Section 501.15). Only utility companies have been authorized by the S~a=e to be billed for fees. c0000 C. Per State Code 671.1, additional fees may be requested once our review of ~he application and plans has been completed. The fees may include plan reviews, meetings, telephone conversations, ~rips to ~he site, and site inspections. c00000 D. Bonds. (Performance' and Payment) may be required and will be based on a detailed cost estimate of the improvements proposed within the State right of way. cl Additional information and design standerda may be found in the latest editions of the following publications: ASHTO (Policy on Design of Urban Highways and Arterial Streets) Obtainable from: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials 444 N. Capitol St., NW Suite 225 Washington, D.-C. 20001 · .The-following list of'.:pUblications may be obtainS' from. ~ California Department of Transpomtion =- Publication Dis=ribution Unit Telephone - ~1~ ~, 4 4 5-3 5 2 0 A AIZ I:alSULTANT SglVICSS ............................. .,t27'.00 AIS aUALITT TEC!alICAL .ANALYSIS IOTES ................ AICIAEOLOGICAL EXCAVATIalS FIESilO SITE AICIA~OLOGIC&L EXCAVATZGKS & .STONE~ING IN I10110 . ~___~l~eeeeeeeee.eeeeeeeeeeeeeee.eee.--eeeeeeeeeeeeede~O0 I III(IVAY Pt.A~INO & O!SIGX ITJU~UIOS .................... MIDGE DESEGM AIDI .................................... HEDGE DESIGN DETAILS .... ; ............................ S~,00 IRIDGE DtSlGII PIACTSCE I~ ........................ INIOGE DESIGX S!~CIFICATI~ell ......................... .5~.00 BRIDGE KE1C TO 0ESZGXEIS ............................. S~.O~ C C~O0 USSSS 14ANUAL ..................................... CALIFOUIA STATE NAP ............... & ................... CAI. IFOINIA STATE P~ILAOAD NAP .......................... CAI. IN! 3 IEPORT - ielEDICTING All i~AJITS ........... 11,00 CJ4. INE A lIEPOeT - PItEDICTING AIR !~AXTS ........... 11,00 CNI NF. D ItGAD PLAH .................................... .3,00 CONSTRUCTION HANDlEIX #1 - !slEIGHTS & i4rdI.S~S .......... CONSTRUCTKIn HAXOIC~X: f2 - STIIEET O~TfOIS ..... ' ...... CC}IISTRfJCTSGll KANDIC~ I'3 - PItCDUCTZOII OF ASPHALT C~mCIETE ..... ; ....................................... & .00 C~NSTRUCTtON KAHUAL .................................. L'~ CC}ST DATA GC~ 1989 .......................... C~IIT&&CT f:~ DATA B~ 199Q .................. ; ....... O DII~FTI!IG &Pt. JUiS 14ANUAL ...................... DIJ~FTING & PLAHS-CXAPTLrR & (PNOJECT PLAN PRSPAJUkTI011 11 X 17 INCLt.DES SUPDLF.14~S ........................ ~7.00 OIS4DVANTAGED 8USEHESS CDI) & U341X ifJSINF.~ ENTEIPRISE (VIE} .................................... 15.00 MS~IIPTIC)N FOI AI~ (OUAITEILY) ................. E EXTEXlLM. LT FZNAXl2D IqL'OJECTS IRAMGI INFI~UMTION & PROC2DU~S GUIDE .................................... ENV!ICmMINTAL NAIDIQGI: - ~ 1 ENVIRGli~AI. . PItOC:~SS PNOC2Z}LIES & OQC}.I41MTS ...................... IT.00 DIvzt~mex'rAL NANOla2X - V~ 2 CULTt.mAL ItSSG. mI:F.S .... .2T'.OQ F FF.~tIELITT Sl~Y FOR X TIll/fLEX INFOIU4ATZON Ck'lrtEI! USING SAFLri~ itO&DSEDE'R~ST AREAS ................. .- ............. G GENEUJ.. SFE'CZFZCATZN FOR SENVTr'r CQKTXACTS GUZDABC~ FCI S~:ZOeCOIg41C ANALYSIS ....................... .6,00 · JZOl Fat CQIi~JLTANTS - ENYIitO~AL NtCl~Je~ FOI THE 00 fiGTECTIOll OF IIZSTORZC pN~TZES/SICTZON lO& GJZOANGE Fret CI~TAHTS - ~ FEN C~HPLETZNG Tile IATt~ IX~I~ .ITUOY &III. A1D lZOf, OGXCAL. IEPQITS .................................. 1T,00 Page MasterCard/Visa A;cepted " ,'~ ,.A,,x s, c, uw: ul,,,nT tarrY. .............. -. ....s.oc LaCAt. ptmotaJa KMIJJU. ~ 1 ................:. ........."- LOCAL PIDGUXS ~ ~f-- 2 ............................. .23.0-' L.OCU. im00ula .KApU~..vaL. 3.,:,,,, .......................,Sa,,cc I!' ':' .27 Qc KUUAC OF TSST VOLm4U 1-2-3 CSTAmato TEST m~xcos) ...... 75.0c 14Asm. oF TIAFFIC cowntof. s .................; ......, .......Z. oc BITE C3XIITZmIS ......................................... PLAn SPECIFICATIOn & ESTlNAlIS BJIOE .................... 17.0,:: Pt, AlffllIG TEEXlIIIIIS & NATEIIALS FOe aEWGETATICI~ OF CALIFOUIA IIMDSIEES ................................... ;ll.0c Pt.~liT NATE!IAL STI.QT ...................................... 11~0c PIEWAILING ~ IATES COCTOIE! (}lILT} ............... PIOJECT DEVILOi~T PSOCIDUF. ES NANUAL ................. 27.00 PI~S 14AIUAL, R:I MCIAL F1J~ED-STATE RIGakaY PROJECTS .................. ; ........................ .,10.00 ' PtCX:~S FOI if. LICTIN6 C~TAHTS F~t FEDEI)J.-AIO HIGINAY PROJECTS ON LOCAL STREETS MiO lOADS .......... PNCX2])fa~S FOI- SPECIAL FIJNDED' STATE' HIGHVAT PnOJECT$...3.00 GUIDE .... ,~ ........... ' ......i ....... .3.00 RIGNT OF VAT VQUME 1 PLAIOilNG & NAMAG84EXT ................. VOLIME 2 RIGliT OF VAY ENGIMEEIIMG .... ;j.:, .... = V~LiJ4E 3 AiePIAISALS ............................ VOLtME & AC:gJISITIOIG I-COfIOB43U~TION U. It. RGADS & C-.ilARDSKIP .& PROTECTION ............ VOLt.S4E 5 UTZLITT GELOC&TIOII .................... VOLt,14E 6 IMP & flUZIG ......................... VQt. U4E 7 PROI~TY NANAGE~ .................. VO~ 8 AIRSPAGE & TILAVELEN SERYIC~S ....... .'.,S&.OO ' VOU~ 9 LOCAl. ASSISTANC~ ...................... .VI3UJ4E 10 EXCISE LAliI3S ........... ,,,; .......... RIGliT OF VAT POLICY ................................... ItC~E 57 PIEOT MATIOI~ TOf~ ROAD AUTNOI!IZATIGI/C~TIOli ........ 1Z.OO Nf3~TE (ALIFOItNIA PIttVATS TRANS!~TATIOll C~TfOli ........ 7,00 ICl. ffl 12S SAIl DIEGO I:UJNTY CALII~I!IIA ~TATIall ~ lie ............... IULES & IEGULATIGIS Fal ~IrFIEIAL TIAFFIE ~ IIEYIEES ......................................... S SAITrV' llama] ........................................ 17.00 SAFETI' FOI SlJIV~ ............................ SClIOCX. AREA I~gOESTItIAH SAFETY ......................... S~ISMIC R.eTItOFIT ...................................... SPECIFICATIOMS Fal C~,IX~aBLE NES~N~E STAm)AIO PLAII - 1918 ....... ~ ......................... ST.tJQ&IO IP!CIFIrJ,TI~IIi -' 1981 ........................ STAlltIE SPlC:IFICATIIXlS Fal M!I.BING STATUTII IILATIIG TO GM.TIJUIS .............. Sullv!l'S maiAL ImUJICES I & 2.,IOUT OF ITOC:X,3 ....... '.,,~.00 T raFFle mJem. ....................................... ,33.oa TEAFFIC SIGN IPEEIFIE&TIalS ........................... ~ TRUFI C EIGILM. ~ EQUIFI~IT FIr,.I.TI ...... ~ATIOll PINNITS NAmJaU. ........................ .Z, .;30 U UIIIFOII4 SlGI GIANTS I 1/2 X UIIIFOIM SIGII MALL C3UUtTS 2& c3 II. Paga 3 It should be noted: The developer/contractor must o~cain an encroachment permit prior to ~he commencement of any work within Sen Bernardins/RiverSide Counties from: Depa~t_ent of'Transportation Permit Section 247 West Third-S~reet Sen Bernardins, CA 92402 (714) 383-4526 or 383-4536 (caltrans) All work Within the State highway right of way shallbe to State S~andards, the Title Sheet of the Plans shall include a General Note stating such III. G~T~T~AT. SUBMTTTAT.S R~OUTR~D 'General Note Statements, S~reet Improvement Plans, Grading Plens,' Striping & Signing Plans, Landscape & Irrigation Plans, Electri- cal Plans, end Signal Plans shall include sufficient per=in'ent details to provide the contractor and the State's representative with adequate information of the'proposed project. ~All permit applications shall' include a detailed engineer's estimate of cost of improvements within the S~ate right of way. If ~he cost of improvements are estimated at $200,000.00 or more a Highway Improvement Agreement may be required. c5 A. TTTT.F. SH~-~T The Title Sheet' or Cover Sheet shall have a Vicinity Map with the proJec~ site indicated, General and/or Construction Notes, Legend, Quantities, and Index of the sheets. The Vicinity Map must cover a minimum of two (2) miles along the State route and at least one (1) major intersection. c6 B. G~qN~AT..NOT~ STAT~T~qTS c7 An encroachment permit is required before any work may begin in or near the State right of way. All applicable General NOte statements shall be shown on the plans. c8 All work within the State right of way shall conform to the- latest State Standard Plans & Specifications or as directed by the State's representative (Standards other than State' Standards must be pre-approved and Justified). ,--, c9 No equipment or materials may be stored on the State right of way. cll c12 c13 c14 c15 ALL disturbed areas in' ~he State right of way must be treat- ed for erosion control (hydroseeding or equivalent, or as directed by the State's representative)- The responstbtlttN-~ for maintaining erosion control will not be released until the seeding is-Well established. 'The Contractor will be responsible for the cost of Caltrans cleaning any drainage structures/channels which have become cluttered with debrta · and/or silt as a result of, or caused by, the construction. : proJect. Access Control on the freeway will be maintained at all ttmes~ i.e., the work inside the State right of way must be fenced off with no access to the work area from the freeway. No freeway ramps or freeway lanes may be closed or obstruct- ed at anytime unless specifically allowed par the encroach- ment permit and/or as directed by .the State's representa- ALL fence reTocated to facilitate the'*cons~ruction Of this project inside the State right of way shall be replaced wit~ type-CL-6 fence as shown in the State's Standard Plans or with a reinforced concrete block wall in accordance with acceptable local agency standards. Where Type CL-6 fence does not exist, the State right .0f way fence. must be upgraded to type CL-6 fence, as shown in the Standard Plans. ---.I The s~ructural section shown within the State right of wa} is for estimating purposes only. The actual section WILL B= designed by a Soil Engineer after native soil testing has been completed. A ~raffi~ index (TI) of shall be used in the design of the travelled way, and a TI of shall be used for the shoulder design. The laboratory reports and the design calculations shall be submitted to the State's representative for approval prior to construc- tion of the structural section. c16 ALL State drainage structures/channels must first be' com- pletely cleaned of debris and/or silt by the contractor prior to making the connection. The contractor shall be responsible for ensuring that .any State drainage facility which is connected to or directly affected by the contractors operation shall be clean and operational-prior to final acceptance of the permit work by the State. Adequate clean-outs and access openings shall be provided in any construction within the State's right cf way' for future maintenance and repair work as needed. This work shall be furnished at no cost to the State. *. C18 Where survey monuments exist, such monuments shall be pro- tected or shall be referenced and reset pursuant to ~nd professions Code, Sections 8700 to 8805 (Land S.urveyo, c20. c21 c22 c23 c24 · Page 5 The pavement shall be saw-cut 2' minimum from the edge of pavement. .The saw-cuts must be perpendicular or parallel to the SCats highway centerline. All signing, striping and pavement markings shall be in' conformante wi~h the current edition of the Traffic Manual, published by the State of California, Department '.of Trans- portation, end the Special Provisions. ~11 pavement mark- ings shall be thermoplastic unless otherwise noted on the plans. The. exact location of all signs shall be determined in the field by the .Stake' s representative. All .conflicting striping end pavement markings not shown on the plans shall~ be removed from the pavement by sandblasting by the contractor. '- . All conflicting signs shall be either:.removed or relocated by the contractor. RelocaCable signs shall be installed as. specified on the plans or as determined in the field by the State's representative- All signs, roadside markers, electrollers, etc., shall be protected and/or replaced in-kind according to the current State Standard Plans and. the current Traffic Manual, at no cost to the State. c2s C26 c27 C28 C29 C30 c31 c32 pT .aNS All Plans shall include and distinguish the existing and proposed construction in ~he Plan View. Details and diman- sions must be included-to accurately ascertain how the proposed project ~ill "FIT" the existing conditions. The · existing centerline, beerings, distances, stationing, and any monumentation shall also be included. No wire mash may be used for concrete reinforcement in the State right of way. Local agency (City, County,.etc.) Standards will be permit- ted in the State right of way only if they exceed State Standards and are approved prior to permit issuance. The State highway centerline shall be shown with 100' eta- tioning on all plans. There must be a minimum of a 10' wide area on the State side of the. right of way fence so State vehicles can be driven along the fence for maintenance purposes. Ail dimensions and offsets shall be referenced from the centerZine or layout lines'of the State highway at specific existing State stations. Right of way and property lines sha-ll also be included and labeled on the Plans. All plans must includecross-sections- ~C33 c34 There shall'be Construction Notes for each item of the proposed work and they must be referenced to the location on the Plans. : ~ All slopes. in ~he S~ate .right of way'shall be 2:1 or flat- c35 c36 c37 'C38 c3~ c40 C41 c42 C43 c44 c45 c46 ~TI~T TIkTIxRO~ pT.XNS The Street improvement Plans shall be signed and stamped by' a registered civil engineer. 'The signature end stamp shall be on the original drawing. The signing or stamping of a copy or print of an original drawing is not acceptable. The Street I~provement Plans. must call out all existing and proposed utilities, hydrants, including street lights and utility poles, which should be 20' from the edge of trav- elled way unless they are 2' behind the face of curb. ..- All curb, gutter,. wheelchair ramps, a~d driveways within the State right of way must be to State Standards. The 'curb and gutter within the State right of way must be placed over a minimum of 4" Class 2 aggregate base compacted to 95% relative compaction per California Test No. 216. All pavement overlays and saw-cuts must begin, end, and run perpendicular or parallel to ~he State highway centerline. The saw-cut shall be on a lane line, but under no circum- stances shall it be less than 2' from the existing edge pavement. The overlay must be feathered to the nex~ lane line. ' All'plans shall distinguish the existing and proposed con- struction on the plan view. Details and dimensions must be included to ascertain how the proposed work will fit the existing-conditions. There shall be a Construction Note for each item of work and they must be referenced on the plans. The plans shall have a "NORTH, arrow on each sheet. The plans should Call out the'scale used (40 or 50 scale preferred). There' should be a Typical'cross-section of a minimum of half-width of the proposed work within the State highway right of way. RadiuS-return driveways can be permitted within the State-. right of way when justified by traffic volumes prior to permit issuance.. A Soils report and design of the actual structural sectic shall be approved by this office'and shown on the plans before an encroachment permit can be issued. ~c47 · Page 7 All improvements between the curb and the state right of way line, such as sidewalks, driveways, and landscaping must include a lette~ -to own and maintains the improved area by either the local agency or the propercy owner if the local agency declines (see Landscaping Plan). c48 c49 c50 C51 c52 c53 CRO~S-R~CTTONR Cross-sections.are required for any work within the State right of.way. . Cross-sac=ions.shall be taken at 50' intervals, from 100' each side of the project limits, along the S~ate right of way or a 300' minimum distance. Special sections are re- quired where existing or proposed conditions change signifi- cantly, such as a driveway. On projects 200'.or less. in length, cross-sections eve17.25' are required with a minimum of four (4-) cross-sections. Additional cross-sections at the center of culverts, drain-' age inlets, driveways and road connections may also be necessary. The cross-sections shall show the existing ground and/or pavement surface and the proposed improvement including the curb, gutter, driveway, sidewalk, thickness and limitS'of ~he overlay and any o=her pertinent s~ruc=ural section information. Existing and proposed elevations shall be shown at grade breaks. Cross-slopes. and/or slope ratios between grade breaks shall be indicated on the finish surface. c54 Cross-sec~cions shall indicate both vertical and horizontal scales and must not be distorted by more than a factor of five (vertical - 1/5 or horizontal). c55 c56 On cross-sections, the. centerlines, saw-cut lines, property lines and State right of way lines shall be indicated by a vertical lane and must be labeled accordingly. It is important that ~he cross-section stationing correspond to the stationing on the plans and that the work indicated on the cross-sections and plans is within the same limits. c57 F. PROFTT.~S Profiles shall include the centerline, top of curb, flow- line, trim-line or edge of pavement profiles, as applicable. c58 The horizontal scale should match the Plan View and the -' ver'cical scale should be 1" - 4' or 1~ - 5' (generally, 1/10 of the horizontal scale) or whatever'will provide the needed detail. C59 The Profiles should be half-plan/half-profile combined into the Plan Views using sheets. C60 C6Z *c62 C63 c64 c65 c66 c67 c68 c69 c70 c71 Page 8 GR.J, TsTNG pT.s. lqS The Grading Plans must include existing and proposed con- tours with finished surface and flow line elevations called out at control points. Cross-slope.and side-slope ratios must be indicated on the plans. The top and toe of the side slopes must be indicated for the proposed.grading. 'The profile of drainage ~acilities shall'be provided, i.e., channels, pipes, ditches, etc. :. Hydrology and hydraulic calCulations must be provided for all new drainage systems calculated at lO0-year storm (QiO- 0). When a connection is tO be made to an existing culvert in the State right of way, the junction structure shall have a - cleanout; this may be a Flood Control District design. The flow in an unlined channel shall not exceed the permis- sible velocity stipulated in Table S62.2 of the State High- way Design Manual. All lined channels must be constructed per Table-872.2 of the Highway Design Manual. .' STRTPTNG AND STGNTNG PT.AN . The Striping and Signing Plan may be shown on the Street Improvement Plans, but separate'Striping and Signing Plans are preferred. All existing signs and striping must be shown, identified, and dimensioned according to the Traffic Manual details. All relocated and new signing and.striping must be shown, · identified, and dimensioned according to the Traffic Manual details. All existing and proposed signals and detector loops must be identified. All striping, marking, and markers must be shown and must conform to the State Traffic Manual. TRAFFTC CONTROT, The permittee shall install and maintain all traffic control' devices as necessary to maintain public safety. All work within 6' of the shoulder will require closure of the shou-1- der. All work within 6' of the traveled way will require closure of that lane. : .Page 9 The Traffic Control Plan shall clearly show: lane closure, placement of ~emporary barrier railing Type K (K-rail), detour, direc~ion of travel for traffic, .all signage type, existing sign locations, new sign locations, and relocated sign locations. Any stage construction shall be presented cleerly showing' the traffic control for each stage. All general notes related to traffic control need to be placed on the plan. c73 C74 c75 Traffic Control is generally authorized only from 9 a.m. to 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding holidays. On high traffic volume highways,- work may be limited to low volume traffic .hours (night work) 'as determined by a Caltrans traffic study. Changes to the State times require an amend- ment to the permit or as authorized in the original permit. The Traffic control Plan is to be. signed by the Registered Engineer responsible for the plan. =. The State inspector shall close down any project found to have a lane closure without the required signage provisions' end/or other required signing placement. C76 J. RT,RCT'~TCAT. PT~N Any work involving electrical lighting will require a 5.0- scale Electrical Plan on a separate sheet. c77 The Electrical Plan shall be prepared on a reproducible film media with blue-line prints provided for the reviews. c78 Design details such as striping, crosswalks and handicap ramps shall be shown on the Elec~crical Plen. c79 The use of a reproduction of an existing "As-Builte as the basis for a modification plan is not acceptable. c80 c81 Plans shall show the existing system as well as the proposed system. The proposed plans must be in bold print end the existing facilities-shall be shown in dashed or broken lines. Wattage and mounting height of the street lights should be specified. c82 K. STGNAT. pT.a.N c83 A 20-scale Electrical Plan shall be provided depicting the existing conditions and the proposed modifications. The Plan must be an original drawing prepared on a standard layout size sheet (24e x 36e). A reproduction of en ~As- Built' Plan will not be acceptable.. -' If road work is involved, the entire package shall be pro- vided for review, i.e., Signal Plan, Striping Plan, Land- scape & Irrigation Plan, and Roadway Plan. c84 Design details such as striping, crosswalks and handicap ramps shall be shown on the Signal/Electrical Plan. c86 c87 c88 C89 c90 c91 c92 C93 c94 C95 C96 c97 C98 C99 c100 C101 b Page 10 Any work involving signals and/or lighting shall be at no - cost to the State unless prior agreements.were made which shall have included all the suppor~ing documen~ation,.i..e.,-~ .DEIR's,-Traffic Studies, and Traffic Warrants. .The acc~den tal des~ruction of State facilities during construction shall be replaced in-kind at no cost to the State. Further- more, any damage resulting in signal failure shall be're- paired 4w~ediately. Loop detector placement and designations shall be consistent with the attached "typical detection layouts'- No detector loop shall be instslled in the path of a drive-' way or other intersection. The Conductor end Pole Schedules ere not guide.statements, they shall be complete and accurate. ... Lighting conductors shall not enter the signal controller cabinet. - Lumirraires shall be furnished without photoselectric unit receptacles. If the luminaire housing is provided with a hole for the receptacle, the hole shall be closed in a weather-proof manner. Only one (1) lamp-type ballast shall be used. Overhead clearance of utility lines must be addressed. A service wiring diagram shall be provided. Provide a stub-out for future coordination. Controller software shall be approved by Caltrans. The intersection lighting schedule shall not be interrupted. Signal shut-downs shall be limited to the hours between 9:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m., Monday through Friday except holidays. No shut-downs shall occur after 12:00 noon on a Friday preceding a holiday. The electrical inspector shall be notified 48 hours prior to performing any work that may cause damage to the existing signal system so that immediate adjus=ments or repairs can be made to maintain the system in operation. Traffic Operations shall be notified at least 7 days in advance of the anticipated "turn on" of signal controller from a new signal system and/or newly added phasing on -. existing signal controllers for modified signal systems.. Wattage and mounting height of street lights should be specified. Unless otherwise specified, conduit runs across a State highway shall be 3". Page c102 c103 cl04 c105 c106 IV. -Turn on" shall be performed on the following day after. all other work is~c.omPleted and satisfactory. The State will perform maintenance, energy end operation on -the signal and lighting facilities. Maintenance and opera- tion cost will be shared with the city and/or the county as per Section 9 of the Caltrans Traffic Manual. Ownership will be the same as in the maintenance participation. At the completion of work, 'it shall be the permit applican- t's responsibility to provide six (6) blueline sets.of "as- built" prints for signals end electrical work end. one (1) blueline set' for civil work. Please send a copy of the approved permit with plans end specifications to L.A. Material Lab, .Attention Gone Alexan- der. T.ANDSCAP~ AND T~RTGATTON You shall furnish this office with a letter stating that you or the local agency will "own and maintain the proposed landscaping and irrigation system in an attractive end safe condition for the ' life of the highway .planting"; c107 All lendscape planting, other than required replacement of existing plants, will be covered by an "own and maintain condi-.. rich" contained in the encroachment permit (or separate permit as -needed). These conditions shall remain in effect for a specific time period as defined in the-permit and/or Cooperative Highway. Improvement Agreement of public agency/private par=y, as applica- ble~ c108 A. PT.AN STANDARDS c109 2. cli0 3. c111 4. Plans shall be prepared and signed by a Registered Landscape Architec~c - The name, registration seal, expiration date and telephone number of the Landscape Architect and Irrigation Designer (if appropriate) ls to be shown on the plans. Plans shall be drawn On a 24-inch by 36-inch size sheet at 50-scale (20-scale when appropriate). Scale and north arrow shall be indicated on the plans. State right-of way line and centerline of highway shall be shown and labeled. Stations (100' on center) should be indicated on the centerline. All existing highway striping, except on freeways, must be shown. C113 cl14 c115 c116 Page 12 5. Extmttng features ,uch a, htVhhazard ut~Ztttes, ,treet names, guard rat1, ,tgns, edVe of pavement (shoulder), pZants, irrigation., curbs, ,tdewalks., sl0pas (2=1, ere,), ditch flow llnes, wail. and fences shall be. shown on .~he plans. Existing futures to be remov&d also should be noted on the plans. The permittee. is' requiredtosutmit copies of .correspondence to'verify ..utility information. .- -- ' 6., A general location map shall be provided with the plans end should show at the minimum, city limits, county. lines, public roads, highways, limits of work,- north arrow, scale and other futures. Botanical name and common name,.quantltles, plants, e.g., 1-gallon, flats, and spacing etc., shall be indicated on the plans. Size:of' (setbacks), Permittee is required to'use Caltrans standard details," plant list, planting-specifications sheet, and special provisions (all' obtained from Permits Landscape Archi- - tect) where applicable. Irrigation plans should indicate electrical and water source-location(s), and the name, address and phone number of responsible utility service company. Water connection information should include: :~ a) Source"(potable or reclaimed water) b) Available water pressure c) -d) Meter size (inches) GPM & PSI at water.'meter c117 B. D~STGN GUTD~T.TN~S Chapter 900 of the "Highway Design Manual" (obtained from Permits Landscape Architect) shall be followed in preparing plans· The following design guidelines supplement "Planting Design Standards" in Chapter 900. C118 C. Glqq"I=TR,AT. Disturbed areas 'on State right of way, which will not be 'landscaped, shall be treated with erosion control. c119 D. PLANTIm D~I~ - CONV~NTTONAT. HTG~AYA~ CONTROT;.~ ACC~RSHTG~AY (~AYI c120 Plants shall be located so as not t~ obstruct motorist. clear vision of any highway signs and signals. Floodlighting or lighting directed at trees or plants is not allowed· c121 No planting should be located where it will interfere with sprinkler coverage. c122 c123 .c124 c125 E. c126 CZ27 c128 c129 c130 c131 C132 Page 13 Plants selected for use near pedestrian areas shall be free from thou, heavy pellens, messy fruit and ber- ries or seed pods, poisonous parts, etc. Plants selected should be expected to live a -4n4-um of 20 years. -Plant selection, spacing and setbacks shall conform to the "Master Plant List" (obtained from Permits Land- sompe Architect) unless otherwise required under "Plan- ting Design" of this section or approved by the Permits Landscape Architect. PT-aNTTNG nP..ctTCN - CO~ONJkT. HTGHWAY 1. t'-l~q~.XT ..... a) Planting 'located near intersections of public streets shall conform to the sight distance stsn- dards in Chapter 200 and 400 of the "Highway De- sign Manual". 2, TR~S a) Trees shall be planted a minimum of five feet. (5') from any walkway unless planted in paved areas between a curb end building entrance. b) Trees should not be planted within one hundred feet (100') of the nearest intersecting public street or in positions that restrict sight dis- tance. Distance is measured from the nearest intersecting right of way line. c) Trees should be planted a minimum of two and one half feet (2.5') behind the curb. d) e) Trees shouldbe located a minimum distance of ten feet (10') from. any driveway, utility pole, fire plug, or to the rear of any highway sign. Spreading trees should be planted a minimum of thirty feet center to center· 3. SHRUBS a) Shrubs shall be planted so that at maturity they will not grow closer than two feet (2') from be- hind the curb and five feet (5') from the right of way line. -- b) Shrubs or high-growing ground cover may be in beds no longer than fifty feet (50').in length with at least a five foot (5') interval between beds to allow pedestrian traffic from the curb to the sidewalk. C133 C134 C135 c136 c137 C138 C~_39 C~41 C~_42 ~43 Page 14 c) Shrubs that.naturally grow over three feet (3F) high should not be allowed within twenty-five fer (25,')* of any driveway or intersecting prlvate road, GROI3ND COVI~ a) b) Grass or an approved ground cover may be planted under permit between. the curb end right of way line,. provided it is maintained for safe 'pedestri- an traffic. Where ground cover other then grass is desired, ' "' the planted area shall be no longer than 50 feet' without leaving at lea~t a five-foot (5') unplent- ed walkway between curb and sidewalk area for pedestrian crossing.- ... c) No ungrouted decorative stone,. gravel or loose material will be allowed for ground cover. TR1;:.R WP.T.T.S When planting is proposed in areas paved or to be'paved between curb and right of way line, tree wells are required. The.following conditions shall apply for ~ such installations: a) b) Tree well design and installation shall consider the safety of' pedestrien traffic. Tree wells in paved areas shall be a minimum of three feet (3') by'three feet (3') square. The street side of tree wells shall be parallel with the curb. Allow for a four foot (4') by four foot (4') tree well where possible· c) 'h'ees should be planted in.the center of eny tree well. d) e) f) · Tree wells should be made safe for pedestrians. Tree-wells flush with the grade of pavement are required. . At least two lengths of four-inch (4") diameter perforated plastic pipe or four-inch (4") diameter cardboard tubes should be installed vertically in opposite corners of.each tree well· The pipe '- should be fi-lled with two-inch crushed rock to provide for deep watering. Tree wells shall be provided with root barriers, C144 Page 15 The tnrcallatton of container plan~s shall follow~he appropriate general plentlng ~utdeltnes in addition to the following conditions: c145 a) Containers will be.permitted only when: there is an existing speed zone of 35 miles per.hour or less; there is a curb or other barrier between the traveled way end the container; end the .container wtll'no~ lower sight distance below required stan- dardso ~ c146 c147 c148 b) c) d) Square'or circular plant containers shall be con- s~.ructed of wood,'metal, concrete, brick or other appropriate material. Circular concrete contain-- ere ere most desirable, .The size of plant containers shall not exceed the- available space between a point two feet (2') beck of the curb face (in medians, six feet beck Of the curb face) and a point five feet (5') in front of the right of way line.. In most cases, dimensions of the containers should not exceed four feet by four feet (4' x 4') for a square container o~ a diameter of four feet (4') for circular contain- ere. Public liability insurance shall be required, the minimum amount being $10,000.00, where-permits ere issued for installing plant containers. Govern-. .mental agencies are exempt from the insurance requirement, but a bond may be required under certain circumstances. c149 e) Plant containers shall be secured to the sidewalk to prevent overturning or shifting and placed to avoid creating a hazard to pedestrian or vehicular traffic. The permittee shall be responsible for temporary relocation when necessary to install, repair, or replace underground facilities; c150 f) The .type of tree or shrub desired in the container should be specified in the permit application. c151 c152 c153 g) h) i) Proper maintenance of the plant and the container is a requirement of the per=it. Containers fre- quently become unsightly because of litter or- unkept plants. Maintain trees so that the lowest limbs ere at least seven feet (7') above the sidewalk surface. Containers with trees or shrubs are not to be used for an advertising display. ~'~c:154 F. IRRIGATION DESIGN - CONVI~TTTON3T. HTGHWAY JLNT~ C'~)]qqTROT,T-F-TI ACCI~--~S HTGHWAY (FR~AYI · .c155 c156 c157 c158 -4· If Cal~rans has water and/or electrical service avail- ~-, able in the area, the new irrigation may be connected .to the existing facilities, provided the permittee assumes the costs for the water; otherwise new sepera~e utflities for the propesedplanting must beprovided. Irrigation lines proposed under paved surfaces shall be installed in conduit.' - Separate control valves for supply lines operating overhead sprinklers at the top, intermediate and toe of slopes shall be provided. "' Bubblor or low flow sprinklers used on slopes 4:1' or greater should be pressure compensating or be equipped with pressure Fompensattng devices· --. ~11 systems shall be designed to allow nomore then a 5. ~eet per second (fps) water velocity. c159 c160 Each planting group (e.g., ground cover, trees, shrubs) shall be watered with separate control valves where possible· Irrigation'systems shall be designed and operated ~o minimize fogging, and overspray of water onto paved surfaces. c161 Uniform water coverage shall be provided when using overhead sprinklers. c162 Design irrigation systems to operate properly at the lowest available pressure. c163 10. Drip irrigation or subterranean irrigation may be used if approved by the. Permits Landscape Architec~c. c164 c165 1· Shut off valves shall be provided to isolate groups of control valves or areas of the irrigation system when servicing or shutting off sections of ~he system· Anti-siphon/anti-drain valves shall be required on supply lines and sprinklers located on slopes in order to minimize toe of slope drainage. c166 c167 c168 G. To minimize drainage at the toes of slopes, anti- siphon/anti-drain valves ere required on supply lines and sprinklers located on slopes. Irrigation desig~ must conform to Caltrans' current water conservation standards and policies. T~RTGATTON DtSTGN - CONV~NTTONAT. HTGHWAY Irrigation systems shall not be allowed unless adequate facilities exist to remove excess water· ~c26g- c170 Page 17 A gate valve shall be installed Within State right of. way where~he supply line(s) errter~he.right of way. Valves end backflow proventot (if installed) shall be installed outside ~he. right of way unless between.. warerings they ere not under pressure~ by ~he use of a master remote control valve. A subsurface drainage system shall be provided in irrigated medians to prevent water flowing onto the roadway· The drainage system should also preyeric lateral infiltration of water into .s~ruc~cural section of roadway and shall be approved by the District Permit Engineer · ' c171 Ve C172 C173 C174 c175 ]knnT~TONAT. ]~~ TTlmW~S The connection(s) to the State culvert(s) must have a clean- out at the point of connection. ProjeCts costing more ~hen $300,000 in highway improvement - work will require a -Projec~ Study Report'. An approved Site Plen with a copy of the local agency "Con- ditions oZ 'Approval" should be included wi~h the encroach- ment application. Six (6) sets of plans are required to circulate your pro- posed project for review. Plans must be 24" x 36" (maximum size). Plans must be individually folded 8-1/2" x 11", per attached diagram.. The following should also be submitted if applicable: C176 C177 Environmental Document Copy'of ~he engineer's cost estimate COpy of the Conditions of Approval These comments may not be all inclusive. An effor~ has been made to identify all concerns, however, due'to the number and range of comments it is possible that some (plans and/or specifications)'omissions may have been overlooked· When -the above comments have been incorporated into the Plans end Special Provisions, another review of both will be made at that time. Assuming all items have been satisfactorily addressed, final comments will be madeincluding recommendations on signal shut-down times and "As-Built" Plans· c178 Please do not call f~r a status on your encroachment permit application until 30 calendar days after all percinent documents, plans, information, etc., Have been submitted. However, if you have technical questions, please call the Permit office on (909) 383-4526 or 383-4536. 11 Dimen~ori for All Fol/ Final R~snlt BeEzs~tlf81n PLANS ARE~ ~F~ ~S~SIIEETS Ftrst-C, rOup of Folds Second Group of Folds 11' t . ~ P~ers not t'ol~ b ~B, ~ w~ll noL be ~cepLe~ fw r'evjew grA July 26, 199,$ Matthew Fagan City of Temecula Planning Department 431~4 Business Park Drive Tcmecula, CA 9'2.590 RE: Planning Application 94-0061 Riverside Transit Agency ,1825ThrdScree~ Fliversie. CA 92507-348~ BUS (gO9) 684-0850 FAX [909) 684-1007 RECEIVED JUL 2 8 ~ /m'L,, ..... D!. TRIBUTE . M_n_-_qer CUP for Old Town Temecula ~ RTA staff has reviewed the Old Town Temeatla Specific Plan and the environmental review materials associated with the project. We apphud the City's plan to develop a theme-related shuttle service, as described in the Notice of PteIm'afion of an I~R for the ,~. {bid Town Redevelopment Project. Shuttle service would definitely complement the pedestrian-friendly environment of Old Town and facilitate the development of consolidated parking on the periphery, as planned. Early planning and broad-based support will be essential to the success of a shuttle service in Old Town Temecula. Since a shuttle would benefit the project area as a whole, we suggest that the master CUP be used to set contribution requirements for future permittees. Please feel free to contact RTA for assistance with transit planning and service in Old Town and throughout the City of Temecula. Sincerely, Planning Manager ATTA~ NO. S PC RF8OLUTION NO. 95- A RF.8OLUTION OF ~ CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING-PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 9541004 (TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 28011) TO SUBDIVIDE 154.1 ACRF.8 INTO EIGHT (8) PARCELS ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED WEST OF PUJOL STREET, EAST OF ~ CITY'S WESTERN BORDER SOUTH OF RIDGE PARK DRIVE, AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCI~-I. NUMBERS 940-310-013, 940-320dM)1, 940-32{M~, 940-320-003, 940-320-004, 940-320-005, 940-320-006 AND 940-3~ WffI~A~, H~ncock Development Company filed Planning Application No. 95-0004 (Tentative Tract Map No. 28011) in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Riverside County I and Use and Subdivision Ol~in~nCe~, which the City has adopted by reference; W~E~EAS, planning Application No. 95-0004 (Tentative Tract Map No. 28011) was processed in the timc and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEKR~I~, the plnnning Commigsion considered p|nnning Application No. ~ ~enm~ve T~ M~ No. 28011) ~ ~y 15, 1~5, ~ a ~y n~ ~b~c ~ E p~sc~ by ~w, ~ w~ ~me ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ei~r ~ su~n or h ~si~; WHKuRAS, the Planning Commi,~ion contimved Planning Application No. 95--0004 at their May 15, 1995 meeting to June 5, 1995; W~ERR&S, at the pubtic h,,mriUg, upon heazing and considering all testimony and arguments, ff any, of all persons deserving to be beard, said Commission considered all facts relating to Phnning Application No, 95-0004 (Tentative Tract Map No, 28011) and recommended approval to the City Council; Vi/I~'~EA~, the City Col~w, il coDsidered Planning Application No. 95~ ~ve Tract ~p No. 28011) on 3u~ 13, 1~5, ~ a ~ly no~ ~ ~g ~ ~ by hw, at w~ch time h~ ~m ~ ~ ~~ W ~ ci~ h ~ ~ h ~on; NOW, TgRRRFORE, ~ CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY OF ~ DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOr J OWS: Section 1. That the above r~itations arc true and correct. Section 2. Findints. findings: That the Temecula City Council hereby makes the following R:\FORM$~'rAFI:RFT.CC 8///'85 Idb Section 5. PASSI~IB, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 13th day of June, 1995. Jdftey E. Stone, Mayor ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk [S~.AZ,1 STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSWE) SS crrY o~ TBMEC'IILA) I ramRay CERTIFY that the fm'eZoinE Resoh~n was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a reEular meethE thereof, held on the 13th day of June, 1995 by the following vote of the Council: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: CITY COUNCH-MEMBERS: CITY COUNCH.MBMBERS: CITY COUNCH~MBMBBRS: June S. ~, City Clerk R:%FORMS~'rAFFRPT.CC 0./96 klb 53 EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA CONDrnONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No. 95-0004 - Tentative Tract Map No. 28011 Project Description: A lldon of 104.1 acres into tins (0) eight (8) lameis Asssssor's Parcel Numbers: 940-310-013, 940-320-001,940-320-002, 940-320- 003, 940-320-004,940-320-005,940-320-006 and 940-320-007 Approval Data: Expiration Data: PLANNING DEPARTMENT Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Nine Hundred Twenty- Eight Dollars (~928.00) which includes the Eight Hundred and Fifty Dollar (e850.00) fee, in compliance with A;13158, required by Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(d)(3) plus the Seventy-Eight Dollars (e78.00)County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination required under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15094. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted herein shall be void by reason of failure of condition, Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c). General Requirements The tentative subdivision shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act and to all the requirements of Ordinance No. 460, unless modified by the conditions listed below. A time extension may be'approved in accordance with the State Map Act and City Ordinance, upon written request, if made 30 days prior to the expiration date. The developer/applicant shall indemnify, protect, defend, and hold harmless, the City and any agency or instrumentality thereof, and/or any of its officers, employees and agents from any and all claims, actions, or proceedings against the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its officers, employees and agents, to attack, set aside, void, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting from an approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions epproved by the voters of the City, concerning (Planning Application No. 95-0004 (Tentative Tract Map No. 28011) which action is brought within the appropriate statute of limitations period and Public Resources Code, Division 13, Chapter 4 (Section 21000 st sea., including but not by the way of limitations Section 21152 and 21167). City shall promptly notify the developer/applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding brought within this time period. City shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action· Should the City fail to either promptly R:\FOIAFFRPT.CC 6/7/96 klb 55 9 notify or cooperate fully, developer/applicant shall not, thereafter be responsible to indemnify, defend, protect, or hold harmless the City, any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its officers, employees, or agents. If Subdivision phasing is proposed, a phasing plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Director. This project and all subsequent projects within this site shall be consistent with Planning Application No. 95-0003 (Westside Specific Plan). The project and all subsequent projects within this site shall be subject to Development Agreement No. DV95-0001. The project and all subsequent projects within this site shall comply with all mitigation measures identified within Planning Application No. 95-0031 (Old Town Redevelopment Project Environmental Impact Report). Prior to the second reading of the Ordinance Amending the Zoning Map of the City of Temecula, a preliminary grading plan shag be approved by the Planning Commission (Added at the inning Commission hearing on June 5, 1995). The applicant shall provide a pedestrian linkage from the Weals, de Spedtic Ran to the Old Town Entertainment Project area. This linkage shall be consistent with the streetscape designs in the Old Town Specffic Plan and will address such items as lighting, landscaping and possible security and sound wells to mitigate impacts to surrounding residential uses. This linkage plan shall be submitted with the first development plan (Added at the Planning Commission headng on June 5, 1995). Pdor to Issuance of Grading Permits 10. A copy of the Rough Grading plans shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Director. 11. The applicant shall comply with Ordinance No. 663 by paying the fee required by that ordinance which is based on (the' gross acreage of the parcels proposed for development). Should Ordinance No. 663 be superseded by the provisions of a Habitat Conservation Plan prior to the payment of the fees required by Ordinance No. 663, the applicant shall pay the fee required under the Habitat Conservation Plan as implemented by County ordinance or resolution. 12. Slope grading techniques on the slope facing Pujol Street shall aim to blend with the existing nature of the topography. Grading techniques shall emphasize slope contouring including contour undulation and variable slopes. In addition, tops and toes of slopes shall be rounded. Hard edges and angles are to be avoided. Slopes shall be designed to smoothly blend with remaining existing topography. 13. An earth berm or sound attenuation wall and landscaping be installed on the ridge above the houses on Pujol Street to minimize noise levels at the nearest residences. R:%FORIVI$'~STAFFh~'T.CC 6/7/95 Idb 56 14. Grading on the slope edge facing Pujol Street shall be revegetated or landscaped immediately upon completion of grading activities, concurrent with project development. Landscaping shell be natural in appearance and linear arrangements of landscaping are to be avoided. 15. The applicant shall demonstrate by submittal of a written report that all mitigation measures identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Program have been satisfied for this stage of the development. Prior to Recordmion of the Final Map 16. The following shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Director: A. A copy of the Final Map A copy of the Rough Grading Plans C. A copy of the Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) with the following notes: (1) This property is located within thirty (30) miles of Mount Palomar Observatory. All proposed outdoor lighting systems shall comply with the California Institute of Technology, Palomar Observatory recommendations, Ordinance No. 655. (2) Planning Application No. 95-0031 (Old Town Redevelopment Project Environmental Impact Report) was prepared for this project and is on file at the City of Temecula Planning Department. D. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&R's) (1) CC&R's shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director. The CC&R's shall include liability insurance and mathods of maintaining open space, recreation areas, parking areas, private roads, exterior of all buildings and all landscaped and open areas including parkways. (2) No lot or dwelling unit in the development shall be sold unless a corporation, association, property owner's group or similar entity has been formed with the right to assess all properties individually owned or jointly owned which have any rights or interest in the use of the common areas and common facilities in the development, such assessment power to be sufficient to meet the expenses of such entity, and with authority to control, and the duty to maintain, all of said mutually available features of the development. Such entity shall operate under recorded CC&R's which shall include compulsory membership of all owners of lots and/or dwelling units and flexibility of assessments to meet changing costs of maintenance, repairs, and services. Recorded CC&R's shall permit enforcement by the City for provisions required as Conditions of Approval. The developer shall submit evidence of compliance with this requirement to, and receive approval of, the city prior to making any such sale. This condition shall R:%FORMS%STAFFRFT.CC 6/7/96 klb 57 not apply to lend dedicated to the City for public purposes. (3) Every owner of a dwelling unit or lot shall own as an appurtenance to such dwelling unit or lot, either (1) an undivided interest in the common areas and facilities, or (2) a share in the corporation, or voting membership in an association owning the common areas and facilities. (4) Ownership of domestic dogs and cats for residential development.within Areas C ~..':.,. _r, (Deleted at the Planning Commission hea~ing on June 5, 1995) of the Westside Specific Plan shall be restrioted. The restriction shall apply to all domestic dogs and cats and shall allow ownership of such animals only when they can be fully managed within the individual residence. Prior to Issuance of Bdlding Permits 17. The following shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Director: Construction landscape plans consistent with City standards including automatic irrigation for all landscaped areas and complete screening of all ground mounted equipment from the view of the public from streets and adjacent property for: (1) Front yards and slopes prior to issuance of building permits for any lot(s) (2) Private common areas (3) Wall and fence plans Precise grading plans consistent with the approved rough grading plans including all structural setback measurements. The Model Home Complex Plot Plan (if applicable for Parcels 7 & 8) which includes the following: (1) Site Plan with off-street parking (2) Construction Landscape Plans (3) Fencing Plans (4) Building Elevations (5) Roor Plans (6) Materials and Colors Board 18. Roof-mounted mechanical equipment shall not be permitted within Parcels 7, 8 and 9 of the subdivision, however solar equipment or any other energy saving devices shall be, permitted with Planning Director approval. R:~FORMS~TAFFRFT.CC en/s5 Mb 58 19. Residential use adjacent to the Westem Bypass Road that place residences within the 65 dB CNEI... noOse contour to install sound attenuation barriers or wells sufficient to reduce noise to a level below this significance threshold. 20. The applicant shall demonstrate by a written report that all mitigation measures identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Program have been satisfied for this stage of the development. Prior to Issuance of Occupancy Permits 21. Front yard and slope landscaping shall be completed for inspection (Parcels 7 & 8). 22. Private common area landscaping shall be completed for inspection (Parcels 7 & 8). 23. The applicant shall sign an agreement and/or post a bond with the City to insure the maintenance of all landscaping within private common area .S for a period of one year. 24. Berming and landscaping shall be employed to conceal and soften visual impacts of parking areas. 25. The applicant shall demonstrate by a written report that all mitigation measures identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Program have been satisfied for this stage of the development. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT The following ere the Department of Public Works Conditions of Approval for this project, and shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All questions regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the appropriate staff person of the Department of Public Works. General Requirements 26. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the tentative map all existing and proposed easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and revision. 27. A Grading Permit for either rough or precise (including all on-site flat work and improvements) grading shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained road right-of-way. 28. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way. 29. All improvement plans, grading plans, landscape and irrigation plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site. R:~,FO~AFFNri'.CC 6/7/95 Idb 59 30. ~ Pursuant to Section 66493 of the Subdivision Map Act, any subdivision which is part of an existing Assessment District must comply with the requirements of said section. 31. All plans shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars. Prior to the Issuance of Grading Permits 32. Tract Map No. 28011 shall be recorded prior to the issuance of any permits. 33. A copy of the grading and improvement plans, along with supporting hydrologic and hydraulic calculations shall be submitted to the Riverside County Rood Control and Water Conservation District and the Department of Public Works for approval prior to recordstion of the final map or the issuance of any permit. 34. A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works. .. 35. The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the subject property. 36. The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or the project is shown to be exempt. 37. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Planning Department Department of Public Works Riverside County Health Department Caltrans Community Services District General Telephone Southern California Edison Company Southern California Gas Company 38. A Soils Report shall be prepared by a registered Soils Engineer and submitted to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered structures and pavement sections. 39. A Geological Report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address special study zones and the geological conditions of the site, and shall provide recommendations to mitigate the impact of ground shaking and liquefaction. v R:\FORMS%STAFFRPT.CC 6/7/95 Idb 60 40. 41. 42. 43. 44. 45. 46. An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval. Graded but undeveloped land shall be maintained in a weed free condition and shall be either planted with interim landscaping or provided with other erosion control measures as approved by the Department of Public Works, The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the prevailing Area Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new development. The charge is payable to the Riverside County Rood Control and Water Conservation District prior to 'issuance of any permit. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid. The Developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or easements for any off- site work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public Works at no cost to any agency. A Drainage Study shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval. The drainage study shall include, but not be limited to, the following criteria.'. Drainage and flood protection facilities which will protect ell structures by diverting site runoff to streets or approved storm drain facilities as directed by the Department of Public Works. be Adequate provision shall be made for the acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. Cm The impact of the site to any flood zone as shown on the FEMA flood hazard map and any necessary protection mitigation measures. d. Identify and mitigate impacts of grading to any adjacent floodway. The following criteria shall be observed in the design of the precise grading plans to be submitted to the Department of Public Works: Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over A.C. paving. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City Standard Nos. 207,207A, 208, and 401 (curb and sidewalk). Street lights shall be installed along the public streets adjoining the site in accordance with Ordinance No. 461 and shall be shown on the improvement plans as directed by the Department of Public Works. R:\FORMS~TAFFRPT.CC 6/7/95 klb 61 47. 48. 49. d. Concrete sidewalks shell be constructed along public street frontages in accordance with City Standard Nos. 400 and 401. All street and driveway centerlie intersections shall be at 90 degrees or as approved by the Department of Public Works. Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersections and adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility. All concentrated drainage directed towards the public street shall be conveyed through under-sidewalk drains. Private roads MUST be designed, reviewed, and approved by the Department of Public Works to meet City Public Road Standards or otherwise approved by the Department of Public Works. This should include but may not be limited to.' Minimum paved road widths of 32 feet within a~lequate right-of-ways or easements (shown on typical section). Knuckles being required at 90° 'bends' in the road. Separation between on-site intersections shall meet current City Standards (200-ft. minimum). de Cul-de-sac geometries shall meet current City Standards. Minimum safe horizontal centerline radii shall be required (all centerline radii should be identified on the site plan). 90° parking immediately adjacent to the private streets shall be located a minimum safe distance from intersections. Identify whether gates will be proposed at entrances to project. If so, configuration, stacking distance, and turn-around ability will need to be reviewed and approved by the 'Fire Department and the Department of Public Works. h. All intersections shall be perpendicular (90°). All driveways providing access to two or more buildings shall be designed as a cul-de-sac or a loop road. Concentrated on-site runoff shall be conveyed in concrete ribbon gutters or underground storm drain facilities to an adequate outlet as determined by the Department of Public Works. The Developer shall accept and properly dispose of all off-site drainage flowing onto or through the site. In the event the Department of Public Works permits the use of streets for drainage purposes, the provisions of Section XI of Ordinance No. 460 will apply. Should the quantities exceed the street capacity, or use of streets be prohibited R:%FORIRS%S"FAFFRlaT.CC 6ri/eS Idb 62 50. 51. 52. 53. for drainage purposes, the Developer shall provide adequate facilities as approved by the Department of Public Works. The Developer shall protect downstream properties from damages Mused by alteration of the drainage patterns; i,e., concentration or diveion of flow, Prctection shall be provided by constructing adequate drainage facilities, including enlarging existing facilities or by securing a drainage easement. Letter of Approval or a drainage easement shall be obtained from the affected property owners for the release of concentrated or diverted storm flows onto the adjacent property. A copy of the drainage easement shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review prior to recordation. The location of the recorded easement shall be delineated on the grading plan. An Encroachment Permit shall be required from Caitrena for any work within their right- of-way. The adequacy of the capacity of existing downstream drainage facilities shall be verified. Any upgrading or upeizing of those facilities, as required, shall be provided as part of development of this project. Prior to the Issuance of Encroachment Permits 54. 55. Improvement plans, including but not limited to, streets, parkway trees, street lights, driveways, drive aisles, parking lot lighting, drainage facilities and paving shall be prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer on 24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars and approved by the Department of Public Works. Final plans (and profiles on streets) shall show the location of existing utility facilities and easements as directed by the Department of Public Works. The following criteria shall be observed in the design of the improvement plans to be submitted to the Department of Public Works: ae Rowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over A.C. paving. be Driveways shall conform to the applicable City Standard Nos. 207,207A, 208, and 401 (curb and sidewalk). Street lights shall be installed along the public streets adjoining the site in accordance with Ordinance No. 461 and shall be shown on the improvement plans as directed by the Department of Public Works. de Concrete sidewalks shall be constructed along public street frontages in accordance with City Standard Nos. 400 and 401. All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be' at 90 degrees or as approved by the Department of Public Works. R:\FORMS~STAFFRFT.CC 8/7/95 Idb 63 Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersections and adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility. 56, 57. g. All concentrated drainage directed towards the public street shall be conveyed through under-sidewalk drains. All utility systems including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer, and cable 'IV shall be provided for underground, with easements provided as required, and designed and constructed in accordance with City Codes and the utility prorider. Telephone, cable TV, and/or security systems shall be pre-wired in the residence. All utilities, except electrical lines rated 33kv or greater, shall be installed underground. 58. 59, All conditions of the grading permit and encroachment permit shall be complied with to the satisfaction of the Public Works I:)epertment. A construction area Traffic Control Plan shall be designed by ;' registered Civil Engineer and reviewed by the Department of Public Works for any street closure and detour or other disruption to traffic circulation as required by the Department of Public Works. Prior to the Recordation of Final Map .60. The Developer shall pay off any remaining assessment balance(s) or reapportion the remaining assessment(s) for any Financing District including the property based on the proposed subdivision. 61. Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid. 62. The Developer shall construct or post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the construction of the following public/private improvements within 18 months in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works. Street improvements, which may include, but are not limited to: pavement, curb and gutter, sidewalks, drive approaches, street lights, signing, traffic signals and other traffic control devices as appropriate. b. Storm drain facilities. c. Landscaping (slopes and parkways). d. Erosion control and slope protection. e. Sewer and domestic water systems. f. Undergrounding of proposed utility distribution lines. R:~ORMSWrAFFRPT.CC 6/7/96 Idb 64 63, As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shell receive written clearance from the following agencies: · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · Sen Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board Rancho California Water District Eastern Municipal Water District Riverside County Rood Control and Water Conservation District City of Temecula Fire Bureau Planning Department Department of Public Works Riverside County Health Department Cable TV Franchise Caltrans Community Services District General Telephone Southem California Edison Company = Southern California Gas Company Fish & Game Army Corps of Engineers 64, 65. Legal all-weather access as required by Ordinance no. 460 shall be provided from the map boundary to a paved City-maintained road. All road easements and/or street dedications shall be offered for dedication to the public and shall continue in force until the City accepts or abandons such offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the Department of Public Works. 66. Vehicular access shall be restricted on Vincent Moraga Drive, Western Bypass Corridor, and First Street and so noted on the final map. Specific access locations shall be determined upon submittal of subsequent development applications as approved by the Department of Public Works prior to recordation of the final map. 67. The Developer shall provide bus bays and shelters within the Specific Plan. Location and number of' bus bays shall be subject to approval of the City and Riverside Transportation Agency (RTA). If required additional rights-of-way dedications associated with bus bays shall be provided by the Developer. 68. A 32 foot easement shall be dedicated for public utilities and emergency vehicle access for all private streets and drives. 69. Corner property line cut off shall be required per Riverside County Standard No. 805. 70. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be required and shall be delineated and noted on the final map. 71. Easements for sidewalks for public uses shall be dedicated to the City where sidewalks meander through private property. R:t, FORMS~S'rAFFRPT.CC 6/7/96 klb 85 73. 74. 75. 76. Easements, when required for roadway slopes, landscape easements, drainage facilities, utilities, etc., shall be shown on the final map if they are located within the land division boundary. All 'offers of dedication and conveyances shall be submitted for review and recorded as directed by the Department of Public Works. On-site drainage facilities located outside of road right-of-way shall be contained within drainage easements and shown on the final map. A note shall be added to the final map stating "drainage easements shall be kept free of buildings and obstructions. ' An Environmental Constraints Sheet (ECS) shall be prepared in conjunction with the final map to delineate identified environmental concerns and shall be permanently filed with the office of the City Engineer. A copy of the ECS shall be transmitted to :the Planning Department for review and approval. Special Study Zones information shall be on the ECS. The Developer shall deposit with the Department of Public Works a cash sum as . established, per lot, as mitigation towards traffic signal impacts. Should the Developer choose to defer the time of payment of traffic signal mitigation fee, he may enter into a written agreement with the City deferring said payment to the time of issuance of a building permit. The Developer shall notify the City's cable TV Franchises of the Intent to Develop. Conduit shall be installed to cable TV Standards at time of street improvements. A declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&R's) shall be prepared by the Developer and submitted to the Director of Planning, City Engineer, and City attorney. The CC&R's shall be signed and acknowledged by all parties having any record title interest in the property to be developed, shall make the City a party thereto, and shall be enforceable by the City. The CC&R's shall be reviewed and approvad by the City and recorded. The CC&R's shall be submitted to the following Engineering conditions: a. The CC&R's shall be prepared at the Developer's sole cost and expense. The CC&R's shall be in the form and content approved by the Director of Planning, City Engineer, and the City Attorney, and shall include such provisions as are required by this approval and as said officials deem necessary to protect the interest of the City and its residents. The CC&R's and Articles of Incorporation of the Property Ownar's Association are subject to the approval of Planning, Department of Public Works, and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrent with the final map. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City. de The CC&R's shall provide for the effective establishment, operation, management, use, repair and maintenance of all common areas, drainage and related facilities. The CC&R's shall provide that the property shall be developed, operated and maintained so as not to create a public nuisance. R:\FORMS~TAFFIqPT.CC 6/7/96 VJb 66 The CC&R's shell provide that if the property is not maintained in the condition required by the CC&R's, then the City, after making due demand and giving reasonable notice, 'may enter the property and perform, at the Owner's sole expense, any maintenance required thereon by the CC&R's or the City ordinance. The property shall be subject to a lien in favor of the City to secure any such expense not promptly reimbursed. All parkways, open areas, on-site slopas and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the association or other means acceptable to the City. Such proof of' this maintenance shall be submitted to Planning and the Department of Public Works prior to issuance of building permits. ii. Reciprocal access easements and maintenance agreements ensuring access to all parcels and joint maintenance of all roads, ddves or parking . areas shall be provided by CC&R's or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrent with the map, or prior to the issuance of building permit where no map is involved. 77. The Developer shell record a written offer to participate in, and waive all rights to object to the formation of an Assessment District, a Community Facilities District, or a Bridge and Major Thoroughfare Fee District for the construction of the proposed "Western bypass Corridor and Vincent Moraga Drive' in accordance with the Mitigation Monitoring Program. The form of the offer shall be subject to the approval of the City Engineer and City Attorney. Prior to the Issuance of Building Permits 78. This development must enter into an agreement with the City for a "Trip Reduction Plan" in accordance with Ordinance No. 93-01. 79. A Precise Grading Plan shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval. The building pad shall be certified by a registered Civil Engineer for location and elevation, and the Soils Engineer shall issue a Final Soils Report addressing compaction and site conditions. 80. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, the approved grading plan, the conditions of the grading permit, City Grading Standards and accepted grading construction practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved rough grading plan. 81. The Developer shell pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities imposed upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public facility mitigation as required under the EIR/Negative Declaration for the project. The fee to be paid shall be in the amount in effect at the time of payment of the fee. If an interim or final public facility mitigation fee or district has not been finally established by the date on which the Developer requests its building permit for the project or any phase thereof, the Developer shall execute the Agreement for payment of Public Facility fee, a copy of which has been provided to the Developer. Concurrently, with executing this Agreement, the Developer shall post a bond to secure payment of the Public Facility R:\FORMS%STAFFRPT.CC 6/7/95 Idb 67 fee. The amount of the bond shall be ~2.00 par square foot, not to exceed $10,000. The Developar understands that said Agreement may require the payment of fees in excess of those now estimated (assuming benefit to the project- in the amount of such fees). By execution of this Agreement, the Developer will waive any right to protest the provisions of this Condition, of this Agreement, the formation of any traffic impact fee district, or the process, levy, or collection of any traffic mitigation or traffic impact fee for this project; orovided that the Developer is not waiving its right to protest the reasonableness of any traffic impact fee, and the amount thereof. Prior to the Issuance of Ce,i;;cates Occupancy 82. In the event that an Assessment District is not formed for the construction of the Western Bypass Corridor and Vincent Moraga Drive, half-width plus one 18-foot lane off site street improvements shall be constructed within dedicated rights-of-way as directed by the Department of Public Works. Signalization, acceleretion/deceleration lanes and additional intersection improvements shall also be provided as directed by the Department of Public Works. Bonds may be posted in lieu of construction. 83. in compliance with the Site Traffic Impact Analysis of the Old Town Redevelopmant Project - Phase I, as prepared by Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc., dated October 28, 1994, the following infrastructure improvements shall be completed prior to issuance of any occupancy: Page 40 of the study states that "at the Rancho California Road/Interstate 15 {I-15) north ramps, on the westbound intersaction approach, widen and/or restripe Rancho California Road to provide one through lane aligned with the (eventual) separate left turn lane at the I-15 south on-ramp, one through lane, one optional through/right turn lane, and one right turn lane. In order to accommodate two lanes of right turning traffic onto the I-15 north on-ramp, widening and/or restriping may be required just north of Rancho California Road; these two lanes should merge into one lane, however, prior to intersecting the mainline of I-15 north". Similar widening and/or restriping shell be provided on the eastbound intersection approach at the Rancho California Road/Interstate 15 south ramp (Added at the Planning Commission hearing on June 5, 1995). Page 19 of the study states that "at the State Route 79 south (SR79s)/I-15 interchanoe, the I-15 north ramp and south ramp intersections with SR79s will be signalized, (and widened to provide additional through and turn lanes)". The feasibility of ultimate southbound loop improvements and connection with Western Bypesa Corridor and acquisition/reimbursement agreement for work in excess of project impact shall be explored. The ramp improvements are currently identified in the Engineer's Report for Assessment District 159 and scheduled to begin construction by the end of 1995. laded at the Planning Commission hearing on June 5, 1995). Page 43 of the study states that "the Western Bvoass Corridor (88 feet full width right-of-way) shall be constructed from the I-15/SR79s interchange to intersect the (proposed) southerly extension of Vincent Moraga Drive (including the bridge crossing over Murrista Creek, median and parkway improvements, sidewalks, and street lights). Between the I-151SR79s interchange and the new R:%FORMS%STAFFRPT.CC 6/7/95 Idb 58 bridge over Murriete Creek, a four lane, divided cross section shall be constructed, thereby providing two through lanes per direction plus a separate left turn lane at major intersectlone. West of Murriete Creek to Vincent Moraga Drive, the street section may be reduced to a two lane, divided cross, thereby providing one through lane per direction plus a two way left turn lane and/or a separate left turn lane at major intersections'. Page 43 of the study states that "Vincent Moreaa Drive (78 feet full. width right-of-way) shell be extended south of its current intersection (existing terminus) with Ridge Park Drive to intersect the Western Bypass (refer to the above item). A two lane, divided cross section shall be constructed, thereby providing one through lane per direction plus a two way left turn lane/or a separate left turn lane at major intersections (including perkway improvements and sidewalks)", The existing segment of Vincent Moraga Drive to Rancho California Road shall be restriped to accommodate this same street section, Page 43 of the study states that 'In relation to the above item, Ridoe Park Drive shall form (be reconstructed to form) a "T" intersection with Vincent Moraga Drive". Page 43 of the study indicates that "the Front Street/Santiago Road/First Street intersection shall be redesigned to provide a four legged intersection via the removal of the existing First Street east leg of this intersection, The existing First Street east leg shall be "relocsted" and shall operate as a "T" intersection with Front Street between Santiago Road and Second Street", Page 43 of the study states that "Front Street (78 feet full width right-of-way) from the Front Street/Santiago Road/First Street intersection shall be extended west to intersect the Western Bypass Corridor, A four lane, undivided, cross section, thereby providing two through lanes per direction (including a bridge crossing over Murriete Creek, sidewalk and parkway improvements, and street lights); however, at major intersections, a separate left turn lane shall also be provided". Page 43 of the study states that "a traffic signal warrant analysis (utilizing criteria established by the State of California Department of Transportation) indicates the Front Street/Western Bvoass Corridor intersection shall be signalized, It is recommended, therefore, that traffic volumes be monitored at this location to determine the precise scheduling of this installation, Moreover, when constructed this traffic signel shall be interconnected with the two traffic signals proposed at the I-15/SR79s interchange". Page 44 of the study states that "(once the First Street bridge is operational) the existing Main Street bridoe over Murrieta Creek may be restricted to pedestrian and local transit circulation". R:~FORMS~rAFFRPT.CC artms eb 69 · 84. 85. Traffic saga shall be installed st the interseceon of Vincent Moraga Ddve and Rancho California Road. Interconnection shag be prodded from this intersection through the signalized intersection of Diaz and Rancho Cdifomla Roads to the intarsa cljon of Front Street and Flancho Ca~fomla Road (Added at the Planning Commission haadng on June 6, 1995). Sufficient parking and a local transit system shall be provided pursuant to the attached alternative scenarios to satisfy the parking demands of the project in compliance with the Old Town Redevelopment Project Parking Study, prepared by Robert Kahn, John Kain & Associates, Inc., dated February 20, 1995. Certain project related parking and circulation improvements will be implemented with the future develooment of Westside Soecific Ran as identified in the Old Town Redevelopment Project Parking Study, prepared by Robert Khan, John Kain & Associates, Inc., dated February 20, 1995, the Congestion Management Program (CMP) Traffic Impact Analysis of the Old Town Redevalopment Project, prepared by Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc., dated October 28, 1994, and the General Plan Build Out Traffic Impact Study of the Old Town Redevelopment Project, prepared by Wilbur Smith Associates, dated March 1995. Pursuant to submittal of subsequent development applications associated with the Westside Specific Plan, ensuing traffic reports, parking studies, and public facilities' analyses determining respective project specific and cumulative impacts identifying implementation responsibilities and the timing of necessary improvements shall be provided. These studies shall be subject to review and the individual project shall be conditioned accordingly and required right-of- way be reserved oo doomod nooosoary by tho Doportrnont of Publio Worko (Deleted at the Planning Commission haadng on June 5, 1995). The mitigations options to bo oonoidorod (Deleted at the Planning Commission haadng on June 5, 1995) are as follows: Page 35 of the CMP analysis specifies the Extension of PUjol Street southerly to intersect Western Bypass Corridor. Page 35 of the CMP analysis specifies improvements to the 1-15/Rancho California Road interchange. The improvements may include "a 'loop" on ramp accommodating eastbound to northbound movements'. Page 4 of the General Plan Build Out traffic analysis recommends "widening of the Rancho California Road bridge (on the south side) to accommodate an additional eastbound through lane'. Page 5 of the General Plan Build Out traffic analysis recommends "construction of a southbound loop on ramp in the northwest quadrant of the I-15/Rancho California Road interchange". Page 5 of the General Plan Build Out traffic analysis recommends "construction of a new southbound off ramp at Santiago Road" (as an alternative). R:%FORMS%STAFFRFT.CC 6/7/95 Idb 70 86. 87. 88. 89. 90. 91. 92. Page 5 of the General Plan Build Out traffic analysis recommends improvements to the I-15/SR79s interchanne. The improvements may include widening SR79s to accommodate additional vehicular turning movements andlor an southbound loop off ramp in the southwest quadrant of the interchange. Page 35 of the CMP analysis states that "a realignment of Diaz Road north of Rancho California Road and the realignment of Pujol Street/Felix Valdez Street to make Diaz Road/Felix Valdez Street/Pujol Street a continuous north-south route may be implemented'. Alternatively, a realignment of Diaz Road north of Rancho California Road to align with Vincent Moraga Drive shall be studied. Page 35 of the CMP analysis states that 'Sixth Street may be extended westerly to intersect Pujd Street. This would require a bridge crossing over Murrieta Creek'. Provision of adequately sized paring lots in compliance with the Old Town Specific Plan at locations specified in the Old Town Redevelopment Project Parking Study to satisfy the parking demands. Page 35 of the CMP analysis states that 'some form of people-mover system (local transit system) shall be provided along Main Street between Front Street (on the east) and the Arena (on the west). This could include a theme related shuttle system, funicular transit system, horse-drawn carts, or an actual pedestrian people-mover. In addition, as necessary, provision of some sort of shuttle system during periods of peak activity to transport patrons to/from parking facilities potentially located on the periphery of the project site". All improvements shall be completed and in place per the approved plans in compliance with the site traffic impact analyses, including but not limited to, curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, drainage facilities, parkway trees and street lights on all interior public streets. All signing and striping shall be installed par the approved signing and striping plan. All traffic signals shall be installed and operational par the special provisions and the approved traffic signal plan. All traffic signal interconnection shall be installed per the approved plan. The Developer shall provide 'stop" controls at the intersection of local streets with arterial streets as directed by the Department of Public Works. Landscaping shall be limited in the comer cut-off area of all intersection and adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance as directed by the Department of Public Works. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the Department of Public Works. R:\FORMS%STAFFRPT.CC 6/7/96 kt 7 1 93, ~ The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken due to the construction operations of this project shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction 'of the Department of Public Works, 94. All necessary certifications and clearances from engineers, utility companies and public agencies shall be submitted as required by the Department of Public Works. COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT General Requirements 95. Class II Bike Lanes shall be identified on the street improvement plans and constructed in conformance with City standards. Where indicated, Class II Bike Lanes shall have a minimum width of 11' to allow for on street parking. 96. All slopes and landscaping shall be improved in accordance With the City of Temecula Landscape Development Plan Guidelines. 97. All Slopes and landscaping adjacent to commercial and multi-family residential development shall be maintained by the property owner or a private property owners' association. 98. The slopas and open space area within Parcel No. 9 shall be maintained by the developer, the City, or other agency approved by the City. Prior to the Recordation of Final Map(s) 99. Prior to recordation of the final map, or raspactive phased map, the park land dedication requirements for Parcel Nos. 7 err-8 (Ddated at the Planning Commission hearing dated June 5, 1995) shall be determined in accordance with the Quimby Ordinance requirements for high density residential development. 100. Private recreational facilities provided within Parcel Nos. 7 :.rid _o, (Deleted at the Planning Commission hearing dated June 5, 1995) may be entitled to receive a 50% credit towards the Quimby requirement. The remaining park land dedication requirement shall be satisfied through the payment of "in-lieu" fees. Prior to the Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy(s) 101. Prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy for each phased map, the developer, or his assignee, shall file an application with the TCSD and pay the appropriate fees for the dedication of arterial and residential street lights into the maintenance program. BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT 102. No comments at this time. R:~OmaSWrAFFRPT.CC ames km, 72 OTHER AGENCIES 103. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Riverside County Health Department's transmittal dated April 24, 1995, a copy of which is attached. 104. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the County of Riverside Fire Department's letter dated May 10, 1995, a copy of which is attached. 105. 106. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Eastern Municipal Water District transmittal dated May 1, 1995, a copy of which is attached. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Riverside Transit Agency transmittal dated May 2, 1995, a copy of which is attached. I have read, understand and accept the above Conditions of Approval. Applicant Name R:\FORMS~STAFFIIrF,CC 6/7/95 klb 73 TO: Loumy of Riverside DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRO~AL ~rr.<H CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING DEPAKTMENT ATTN: Matthew Fagan, Assistant Plann~ RECEIVED MAY 2 1SS5 ~ JOHN C. SILVA, P.E., Senior Public Health Engineer FROM: ~//~~qTA~ RE: TRACT MAP NO. 28011 - A N]lqE PARCEL SUBD~SION - SPECIFIC PLAN FOR 153.1 GROSS ACRES (Westside Specific Plan) 1T/ATE*.R,t~Iq'R/~.R: John C. 8iiv-- P.l?... Senior Pnblie lto-!th l?.n~ineer. D~.partment ofF, nvironment-! The referenced tract will require pipe-line extension(s) of the domestic water and sanitary sewer system(s). This work would be in concert with the Eastern Municipal Water District and Rancho California Water District. Whenever possible, the nine lots should try to implement the use of reclaimed water which is immediately adjacent to the proposed projecL If you should have any questions regarding the above, please do not hesitate to contact me. --.- JS:dr (909) 275-8980 - . RIVERSIDE' COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT ~ J M. ~ 210 W'r.$r SAN JACiNTO AVIj'4t~ · FJRRIS, CALIFORNIA 92570 * (909) 657-3183 May 10, 1995 TO: ATIYN: RE: PLANNING DEPARTMENT MA'A'A]:~ FAGAN V~t~-A:~ug SPBCr~C ~ P~5~ - P~~ With xespect to the review and/or approval of the above rderenced document, the trwposed project will have a cumulative impact on the depamnent's ability to pwvide an accepuible level of service. These impacts m'e due to the increased tartuber of emergency or public service C'All,~ generated by additional tmildings and human pop~-- A poffion of the progr3m. However, the '~x~ costs nece~ry for the increased number of cabs is only paxfi:~ny off-set by the county stxuclm'e fire mx and would xequixe an inc~ase in the city general fund portion of the ~ deparunent's anmml operating budget. increase in the ..re, n1 budget- The1~or, the Fire ~ent Ecomm , app specific plan subject W the following conditions and/or mitigations. All water m,l,.~ and fire hydrants providing tcqukeA fn~ flow sh,n be con.m-acied in accord, nce wi~x the-approprisXe sections of Ordinance No. 460 and/or No 546, All buildings shall be constructed with fire xetard~ut roofin~ ~. Any wood shingles or shakes shall have a clau "B" raling and shall be st~pwved by the Depaztgnent pfioz to '~ RIVERSIDE OFFICE 3760 12th St~et, Riverode, CA 92501 t9(}9) 2754777 , FAX 1909) 369-7451 fiRE PREVENTION DIVISION PLANNING SECTION ::~ INDIO OFFICE 79-733 Ca.mntry Club Drive:. Sui~ F. indio. CA 92201 (619) 8634886 * FAX (619) 86;3-7072 A~ queStiOD~ rOga/~in~ the me~nlng of thi~ cosditio~ shall b~ z~fcz:r~ tO ~ ~hnnlng axld En~n~-~ng Staff. l~.ymo~ H. Regis Fire DepaxUnent pXanner Laura Cabral F~ safety s~ astern ]V[unicipa[' ' ater Di rict May 1, 1995 Mr. Matthew Fagan, Assistant Planner City of Temecula Planning Department -43174 Business Park Drive · Temecula, CA 92590 Re: Westside Specific Plan - Tentative Trac~ Map No. 28011 Dear Mr. Fagan: We have reviewed the materials transmitted by ~our office which describe the subject project. Our comments are outlined below: GENERAL It iS our understanding that the subject project is a proposed Specific Plan and Tentative Map No. 28011 comprised of 154.1 acres, located westerly of Pujol Street in the City of Temecula. The Westside Specific Plan proposes a combination of special event commercial areas, high density residential, and hotel uses. The subject project is located within the District's sanitary sewer service area, however, it must be understood the available service capabilities of the District's systems are continually changing due to the occurrence of development within the District and programs of systems improvement. As such, the provision of service will be based upon the detailed plan of service, the timing of the subject project, the status..of..the District's permit to operate, and the service agreement between the District and the developer of the subject project. The District 'has been coordinating with the City of Temecula regarding the project and the Old Town Specific Plan. The information shown on Figure 6 in the Westside Specific draft document does not appear to be complete or in accordance with the expected District requirements for the project. The District requires a plan-of-service for the subject project which should be requested by the applicant and accompanied by a minimum $2,500 deposit for preparation of the plan-of-service- The findings of the plan-of-service for sanitary sewer service to the site shall be incorporated into the Specific Plan document. Mail To: Post Office Box 8~00 · SanJsrinro, California 92:}81-8~00 * Telephone (909) 92%7676 * Fax (909) 929-0257 Main Offim: 2/)45 S.$saJsaiam Aveme, SanJacimo * r,,-,et,~Setvim/s:,~,*,4agAmsex: 440 EOaklaad Avemz, Hezm, CA Mr. Mat=hew Fagan TTM 28011 May 1, 1995 Page 2 The Distric= is currently coordinating with the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District for information regarding the proposed Murrieta Creek Channel and potential scour depth in the channel.' This information is critical to the final District sanitary sewer plan-of-service to the Westside Specific Plan area. o Should you have any questions regarding these comment, please feel free to contact me at (909) 925-7676, ext. 4468. Sincerely, Eastern Municipal Water Distric~ Kevin L. Crew Senior Customer Service Engineer KLC/cz cc: John Pourkasemi, City of Temecula John Fricker, EMWD i:%WORDImROC~V~,%Nh"~_BUSI.11~ZI-ZVXq'IvI211}I1 May 2, 1995 Matthew Fagan City of Temecula · Planning Depamnent 43 174 Business Park Drive Temecuh, CA 92590 eiv~,d ': 'iVansit Agency 1~.S Third Street P.O. Box 59968 Riverside, CA 92517 Phone: (909) 684-0850 Fax: (909) 684-1007 PA 95-0003 Westside Specific Plan and TIM 28011 ... Applicant: Hancock Development Company, Inc. RTA staff has reviewed the Westside Specific Plan and the associated tentative map 20811. The project seems to be a logical, complementary extension of Old Town Temecula, including the connection of the Main Street pedestrian thoroughfare and the remote parking and shuttle service concepts., Curren~y, RTA Route 23 provides local Wansit service in the Old Town area. RTA would like the opportunity to expand bus service as the area develops. We request construction of bus turnouts on the We. stem By-Pass Corridor, consistent with the standards in the Old Town Temecuh Specific Plan. We would like to specify turnout locations at the time of site development,. if possible, so that the bus stops will facilitate the most convenient access. When the site development plan for the Wild West Arena becomes available, we would also like to review the pwvisions for on-site bus circulation and the proposed bus parking configuration. RTA bus ramout design guidelines ar~.' enclosed for yore' .reference. The adjacent bike lane design might work best ~vith. ~.e 8 ft. F'~:k'ing or b~.kc hne ov the WcsteTn By-Pars corrLdor. Please contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, Cis LeRoy Planning Manager enclosures Section ~. PASSED, APPROV!~ AND ADOPTED this 13th day of June_, 1995. Jeff~ B. Stone, Mayor ATTI~T: lune S. ~, City Clink [SSAL] STATE OF CA~-mORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERI1DH) SS CHY OF TSMIJC'~LRA) I mm~.ny CERTIr/that the foxegoin8 Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecu~ at a regular mee~ng thereof, held on the 13th day of June, 1995 by ~the followin8 roe of th~ Cm,u~n: CITY COUNCILM]t~SRS: NOES: CITY COUNt: CITY COUNCILIVlEMBERS: June S. Greta, City Clerk 4_ R:\FORMS~'TAFFRPT.CC 6/7/96 klb 53 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 95-0004 (TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 28011 ) R:%FORMS~'rAFFRFT.CC 6/7/e6 Idb 54 RTA July 26, l~J4 Matthew Fagan City of Temecula Planning Department 431'74 Business Park Drive Temeatla, CA 92590 RE: Planning Application 94-0061 Riverside Transit Agency · 1825 Third SIToe~ ~. a~ 92507~48A BUS (909) 6844)850 F ~ ~) 6~ 1 ~ RECEIVED JUL 2 8 ks'L_:- ..... N !I,,Ri!TFh Master CUP for Old Town Temecula RTA staff has reviewed the Old Town Temecula Specific Plan and the environmental review materials associated with the project. We apphud the City's plan to develop a theme-related shuffle service, as described in the Notice of Pretmx'afion of an k"IR for the ibld Town Redevelopment Project. Shuttle service would definitely complement the pedestrian-friendly environment of Old Town and facilitate the development of consolidated parking on the periphery, as planned. Early planning and broad-based support will be essential to the success of a shuttle service in Old Town Temecula. Since a shuttle would benefit the project area as a whole, we suggest that the master ClIP be used to set contribution requirements for future permittees. Please feel free to contact RTA for assisumce with transit planning and service in Old Town and throughout the City of Temecula. Sincerely, Cis LeRoy Planning Manager ATTACHMENT NO. 5 PC RESOLUTION NO. 95- PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 95-0004 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 28011 R:~FORMS%STAFFFIPT.CC 6/7/95 Idb 50 ATTACHMm~ NO. ~ PC I~-~OLUTION NO. 9~- A RESOLUTION OF THr. CITY COUNCIL OF TifF. CITY OF T~MECULA APPROVING-PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 95-0004 CrENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 28011) TO SUBDIVIDE lS4.1 ACRES' INTO EIGHT (8) PARCELS ON PROPERTY GENER,~kT-T-Y LOCATED WEST OF PUJOL STI~!~.T, EAST OF Tin?* CITY'S WESTERN BORDER SO~ OF RIDGE PARK DRIVE, AND KNOlSN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUIVIB~ 940-310-013, 940-320-001, 940-320-002, 940-320-(MB, 940-320-(MM, 940-320-00$, 940-320-006 AND 940-320-007 Wpi~:uF. AS, Hancock Development Company ~ed Planning Application No. 95-0004 (Tentative Tract Map No. 28011) in accoxdance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Riverside County l~nd Use and Subdivision Ordbmnces, which the City has adopted by rderence; WH3mE~kS, Planning Application No. 95-0004 (Tentative Tract lVf~ No. 28011) processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local hw; WH~:ul~-A~, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application No. 95-0004 (Tcnta~vc Tract Map No. 28011) on May 15, 1995, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time ~ punons had an opportunity to testify either in support or in opposition; WI:!ERE4,S, the Planning Commition continued Planning Application No. 95-0004 at their May 15, 1995 meeting to June 5, 1995; WHERF*~.S, at the public heari.ng, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, ff any, of all persons deserving to be heard, said Commission considexcd all facts relating to Planning Application No. 95-0004 (TenUttive Tract Map No. 28011) and recommended approval to the City Council; WTnnH~.AS, the City Council considered Planning Application No. 95-0004 (Tentative Tract Map No. 28011) on June 13, 1995, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by hw, at which time intew, sted persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or in opposition; NOW, THKuEi~ORE, T!:W. CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY OF 'r~vIECTRA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOTJ-OWS: Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct. Section 2. Findings. That the Temecula City Council hereby makes the foliowing findings: R:\FORM$~I"AFFRPT.CC 6/7/96 Idb 51 with the City's General Phn and the proposed Westside Spedtic Plan (Planning Application No. 95~N)04). problems. The project as ~ is con.~i.qe~ with the City's General Plan, the State Subdivision ~ Act, Ordinnnce No. 460, and the proposed Westside Specific plsn (Phnnlng Application No. 95-0003); thereby, it is assured to be suitable for the type of development .and not cause serious health problems. 3. The design of the In*oposed bud division or ~ improvemems are not lilely W cause substantial envizDnmeDtal daxDage or sub~.ntlsrly and unavoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. The Pinal Environm~ Impact for thi.~ pz~ect .has been certified and any impacts that were identified in the FEIR will be mitigated to a level less than significant. within the proposed lnnd division. A land division may be approved if it is found that slternqte easements for access or for use will be provided and that they will be substan~inlly equiv~..t to ones previously acquired by the public. This subsection shall apply only to easements of record or to easements established by judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction. A. As condifloned pursuant to Section 4, Planning Application No. 95-0(X)4, as proposed, conforms to the logical development of its proposed site, and is compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community. Section 3. l~nvironm,.~tnl Cotqplinnce. The City of Temecula City Council hereby certifies FRTR phnning Application No. 95-0031, adopts Findings of Fact and Stntements of Overriding Consideration and approves of the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the Old Town Entertainment Project which includes the. Westside Specific Plan and subsequent development proposals (including Planning Application No. 95-004 - Tentative Tract Mn,n No. 28011) within the area. Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Tanecuh City Council approves Planning Application No. 95-(X}04 to subdivide 154.1 acres into eight (8) parcels generatly located west of Pujol Street, east of the City of Temecula' Western border, south of Ridge Park Drive and known as Assessor's Parcel Numben 940-310-013, 940-320-001, 940-320-002, 940-320-003, 940-320004, 940-320005, 940-320-006 and 940-320-007,. subjea to the following conditions: A. Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incotponted herein by this reference and made a part hereof. R:\FOI~AFFIlaT.CC 8/'7f86 Idb 52 32 I I I I llllllllllllllll · I · I I 1111111111111111 I ~ I I ~ I I I I I I I I j I I I I I I I i I I I I 26 w w W N W m ATTACHMENT NO. 6 RESOLUTION NO. 95- DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. DV95-000i R:~FO,MS~Tkqa'T.CC or;ms k,. 74 ATTACHMENT NO. 6 RESOLUTION NO. 9~__ A RESOLITHON OF Tnt~ CITY COUNCIL OF THY~ CITY OF TI~IECULA APPROVING DEVEt~)PMENT AG]zRPMENT NO. DV9S- 0001 FOR PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 9S-0003 (WESTSIDE SPECIFIC ~ CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY OF ~ DOF.~ m~ERy RESOL~ AS FO~ J OWS: VIHYERRJ, S, the Planning Commission held a noticed public h~aring on May 15, 1995, on the issue of recommending approval or denial of the Development Agreement; and v~, the planning Commigsion contimled Development Agreement No. DV95.- 0001 at their May 15, 1995 meeting to June 5, 1995; and W~EREAS, at the public heating, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons deserving to be heard, said Commission considered all facts rehting to Development Agreement No. 95-0001 and recommended appwval to the City Council; W!:rk'~EJ, S, the City Council held a noticed public heating on June 13, 1995, on the issue of recommending approval or denial of the Development Agreement; and NOW, THEREFORE, ~ CITY .COUNCIL OF ~ CITY OF TEMECULA DOES FIND AS FOr ,t OWS: Section 1. That the City Council approves the Development Agreement, in subsUmtially the form of Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by thi. reference. Section 2. That in approving the Development Agreement the City Council hereby make the following findings: 1. The Development Agreement is consistent with the objectives, policies, general land uses, and programs specified in the City of Temecula's General plnn in that the Development Agreement makes reasonable provision for the use of certain real property for commercial, residential and open space development and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Designations for the site; and, R:\FORI~I~TAFFRPT.CC ~/7/95 Idb 75 pa,,,,_,, and, 3. ~ Developmere A~ree~ is in coufouuity mrifia the lmblic convenience, general welfare, and good land use Inactice because at nm reasonable proviSa~ for a of land uses compatible with the x~,mainder Of the City; and, 5. Notice of the public heating before the City Council was published in a newspaper of general ciradation at least ten (10) days before the City Council pt;blic h~Hng, and mail~l or delivered at least ten (10) days prior to the he~Hng ~o the project applicant and to each agency expected w provide water, sewer, schools, police protection, and fire pwtcction, and to all property owneli within one thoq~nd feet (1,000') of the pwln~ as shown on the latest equalized assessment roll; and, 6. Notice of the pubtic hearing before the City Council included the date, time, an~ place of the pubBe heating, the identity of the hearing body, a genezal explanation of the matter to be considered, a general description and t~xt or by diagram of the location of the real property that is the subject of the he, rin~, and of the need to exhaust nc~mini.q:rative remedies; and, 7. The Development Agreement complies with the goals and objectives of the Circulation Element of the General Plan and the traffic impacts of the development over the period of the Development Agreement will be substaminlly mitigated by the mitigation measures and conditions of appwval imposed; and, 8. The Development Agreement complies with requirements of the zoning district in which the applicant proposes to develop in that the Specific Plan zoning of High Density Residential is consistent with the Medium Density Residential General Plan I~nd Use Dcsigtmtion; and, 9. The benefits that will me to the people of the City of Temeatla from this legish~on and this Development Agreement are as follows: a. Generation of municipal revenue; b. Public infrastruatue facilities; c. Enhancement of the quality of life; including recreation facilities for present and future residents of the City; R:\FORMB~,STAI~.CC 6/7m6 Idb 76 d. The ~ty for an adjacent msidenti=i-commercial project creating significant job opponunilies, sales lax and ad valorera tax revenues for the City; e. Payment of Public Fncilifies Fees (fire and U-affxc signal miti~ntion); infrastructure improvemere; and, g. The creation of recreation tJedicstions and payment of in lieu fees for public use and the protection of significant nanunl resources. : Section 5. The Development Agreement imposes upon the subject property the sam land use regulations imposed by the Wemide 5peci~c Plan. Therefore, the Development Agreement will have the rime impact on the environment as the Westside Specific plan. No further environmental review beyond that undertaken for the Westside. 5~ Plan is necessary because none of the circumsmce~ described in Section 15162 of 11tie XVI of the Cnllfornia Administrative Code ('CBQA C:midelines') are found to exist. Section 4. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 13th day of June, 1995. Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor R:\FORMS~I'AFFRlYT.CC 6/7/95 IrJb 77 ,,--- ATIF_,ST: June S. C.m~, City Clerk [SEAL] STATB OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS crry OF T~nVlBCULA) I It'ERERy C!ilR'r~Y that the fot~oing Re~lution was duly adopUxl by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a re~lar meeting thereof, held on the 13th day of June, . 1995 by the foilowin~ vote of the Council: .. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ~ COUNCIIIIEMBERS: CITY COUNCK,MmlBERS: CITY COUNCTt-MEMB~: June S. GnU, City Clint R:\FORM$~STAFFIIrr. CC e/'//~5 Idb 78 EXHIBIT A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DV95-0001 R:\FORMS\STAFFRFT.CC 6/7/95 Idb 79 EXEMPT FROM RECORDER'S FEES Pursuant to Government Code §§ 6103, 27383 Recording Requested By and When Recorded Retum to: CITY CLERK CITY OF TEMECULA 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, ca 92590-3606 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN AND HANCOCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC. AND JOHN F. FIRESTONE Development Agreement No. DV95-0001 THIS AGREEMENT SHALL BE RECORDED WITHIN TEN DAYS OF EXECUTION BY ALL PARTIES HERETO PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF GOVERNMENT CODE § § 65868.5 R:~STAFFFFT~GREEMNT.OT 8/7/96 Idb DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT This Development Agreement ("Agreement") is made this ~ day of , 1995, by and between the CITY OF TEMECULA, a general law city in the State of California (the "City") and HANCOCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC., a California corporation ("Hancock") and JOHN F. FIRESTONE, an unmarried man ("Firestone") (together, Hancock and Firestone are referred to herein as the "Developer"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements contained in this Agreement, the City and Developer agree as follows: 1. Recitals. This Agreement is made with respect to the following facts and for the following purposes, each of which is acknowledged as true and correct by the parties: A. The City is authorized pursuant to Government Code Sections 65864 through 65869.5 (the "Development Agreement Statute") to enter into binding agreements with persons or entities having legal or equitable interests in real property for the development of such property in order to establish certainty in the development process. B. The parties desire to enter into this Agreement in conformance in conformance with the Development Agreement Statute and the City of Temecu!a Municipal Code in order to achieve the development of the "Westside Specific Plan" area (the "Site") as expressly provided under the terms of this Agreement. The legal description of the Site is shown on Exhibit "A" attached hereto. The parties likewise desire to provide complementary land uses to the Old Town Temecula Specific Plan and provide public services and urban infrastructure, all in the promotion of the health, safety, and general welfare of the residents of the City of Temecula. C. The development for the Site, as contemplated by the Westside Specific Plan includes special uses that complement the uses permitted by the Old Town Temecula Specific Plan and the General Plan of the City (the "General Plan"), including a "Wild West" arena, a hotel, supporting commercial, high density residential, a mixed-use transition area and natural open space areas (the "Project"). , D. On May 15, 1995, the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula held a duly noticed public hearing on the Developer's application for the Agreement, the Westside Specific Plan (Planning Application No. PA95-0003) (the "Westside Specific Plan") and Tentative Tract Map No. 28011 (Planning Application No. PA95-0004) (the "Tentative Map") (together, the Westside Specific Plan and the Tentative Map are referred to herein as the "Project Approvals") and by Resolution Nos. recommended to the City Council approval of the Project Approvals and this Agreement. E. On , 1995, the City Council, held a duly noticed public hearing on the Westside Specific Plan, the Tentative Map and this R:'b'TAFFRP'I~G~.OT 6/7/96 klb 1 Agreement. F. On ,1995, the City Council of the City adopted Ordinance No.__ approving the Westside Specific Plan, Resolution No.__ approving the Tentative Map and Ordinance No.__ approving this Agreement with the Developer. G. An environmentel review has been conducted and approved in conjunction with the Project Approvals and this Agreement in accordance with the California Environmentel Quality Act and the City Council has considered and certified Environmentel Impact Report (Planning Application No, PA95-0031 ). H. The City desires to obtain the binding agreement of the Developer for the development of the Site in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement and the approved Project. I. The Developer desires to obtain the binding agreement of the City to permit the Developer to develop the Project and Site in accordance with the "Applicable Rules" (as hereinafter defined) and this Agreement. J. Developer has applied to the City in accordance with applicable procedures for approval of this mutually binding Agreement. The Planning Commission and City Council of the City has given notice of intention to consider the agreement, has conducted public hearings thereon pursuant to the Government Code, and has found that the provisions of this Agreement are consistent with the Applicable Rules, including, without limitation, the Westside Specific Plan and the City's General Plan. K. This Agreement is consistent with the present public health, safety, and welfare needs of the residents of the City and the surrounding region. The City has specifically considered and approved the impact and benefits of the Project upon the welfare of the region. L. This Agreement will bind the City to the terms and obligations specified in this Agreement and will limit, to the degree specified in the Agreement and under State law, the future exercise of the City's ability to delay, postpone, preclude or regulate development of the Project on the Site, except as provided for herein. M. In accordance with the Development Agreement Statute, this Agreement eliminates uncertainty in planning process and provides for the orderly development of the Project. Further, this Agreement eliminates uncertainty about the validity of exactions imposed by the City, allows installation of necessary improvements, provides for public services appropriate to the development of the Site, and generally serves the public interest within the City of Temecula and the surrounding region. 2. Definitions. In this Agreement, unless the context otherwise requires: R:t,qTAFFFtPl%M~REBVIfr. OT 6/7/96 Idb 2 (a) "Applicable Rules" means the rules, regulations and official policies governing permitted uses of the site, governing density,. and governing design, improvement and construction standards and specifications applicable to the development of the Site in force at the time of the "Effective Date" (as hereinafter defined), including, without limitation, the General Plan, City's current Zoning Code, which is comprised of County of Riverside Ordinance No. 348, as adopted and amended by City, and the Project Approvals. Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing in this Agreement .shall preclude City from applying changes occurring from time to time in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Electrical Code, Uniform Fire Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, or Uniform Plumbing Code, provided that such changes (i) are found by City to be necessary to the health or safety Of the citizens of City and (ii) are generally applicable to all property in City. Prior to the Effective Date, City and Developer shall use reasonable efforts to identify two identical sets of the Applicable Rules, one set for City and one set for Developer, so that if it becomes necessary in the future to refer to any of the Applicable rules, there will be a common set of the Applicable Rules available to both parties. (b) "Discretionary Actions; Discretionary Approvals" are actions which require the exercise of judgment or a decision, and which contemplate and authorize the imposition of revisions or conditions, by the City, including any board, commission, or department of the City and any officer or employee of the City, in the process of approving or disapproving a merely requires the City, including any board, commission, or department of the City and any officer or employee of the City, to determine whether there has been compliance with applicable statutes, ordinances, regulations, or conditions of approval. (c) "Effective Date" is the date the ordinance approving this Agreement became effective, which date was ,1995. (d) "Future Approvals" means any development of the Property which requires Discretionary Approvals pursuant to the Applicable Rules, including, without limitation, parcel maps, tentative subdivision maps, and conditional use permits. Upon approval of any of the Future Approvals, as they may be amended from time to time, they shall become part of the Applicable Rules, and Developer shall have a "vested right," as that term is defined under California law, in and to such Future Approvals by virtue of this Agreement. (e) "Public Improvements" means those public improvements contemplated by the Project Approvals. 3. Interest of Develooer. The Developer represents to the City that, as of the Effective Date, it either owns or is contractually entitled to acquire all of the Site subject to encumbrances, easements, covenants, conditions, restrictions, and other matters of record. 4. Binding Effect. This Agreement, and all of the terms and conditions of R:~rAFFFlaT~GREEMNT.OT 6/7/95 klb 3 this Agreement, shall run with the land comprising the Site and shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties and their respective assigns, heirs, or other successors in interest. 5. Nenmion of Agency. The parties acknowledge that, in entering into and performing under this Agreement, each is acting as an independent entity and not as an agent of the other in any respect. Nothing contained herein or in any document executed in connection herewith shall be construed as making the City and Developer joint venturers, partners or employer/employee, .. 6. Develogment of the Property. The following specffic restrictions shall govern the use and development of the Project and the Site: (a) Permitted Uses The Site may be developed and used for the development of the Project in accordance with the terms of the Project Approvals and the Applicable Rules. (b) Develonment Standards All design and development standards applicable to the development of the Site shall be in accordance with the Applicable Rules. (c) Density and Intensity of Use The density and intensity of use shall be in accordance with the Applicable Rules. {d) Maximum Height and SiTe of oroject Buildings The maximum height and size of the Project buildings shall be in accordance with the Applicable Rules. (e) Reservation or Dedication of Land for Public Purooses The reservation or dedication of land for public purposes shall be in accordance with the Applicable Rules. 7. Acknowledgments. Agreements and Assurances on the Part of the Developer. The parties acknowledge and agree that Developer's faithful performance in developing the Project on the Site and in constructing and installing public improvements and complying with the Applicable Rules will fuffill substantial public needs. The City acknowledges and agrees that there is good and valuable consideration to the City resulting from Developer's assurances and faithful performance thereof and that same is in balance with the benefits conferred by the City of the Project. The parties further acknowledge and ,agree that the exchanged consideration hereunder is fair, just and reasonable. Developer acknowledges that the consideration is reasonably related to the type and extent of the impacts of the Project on the community and the Site, and further acknowledges that said consideration is necessary to mitigate the direct and indirect impacts cause by the development of the Project. In consideration of the foregoing and the City's assurance set out in Section 8, Developer hereby agrees to use its reasonable best efforts, in accordance with its own reasonable business judgement, taking into consideration market conditions, financing and other economic factors, to develop R:%STAFFRPT~GREEMNT.OT 6/7/96 Idb 4 the Project on the Site in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement and the Applicable Rules. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, it is understood and agreed that the obligations of Developer under this Agreement shall not be personal recourse obligations of Developer, but shall be conditions which, if not satisfied by Developer, its successors or assigns, will give the City the right to seek a modification or termination of this Agreement in accordance with the procedures described in Sections 10 through 12 of this Agreement. 8. Acknowledgements, Aareement. s, and Assurances on the Part of the City. In order to effectuate the provisions of this Agreement, and in consideration for the Developer to obligate itself to carry out the covenants and conditions se~ forth in the preceding Section 7 of this Agreement, the City hereby agrees and assures Developer that Developer will be permitted to .carry out and complete the development of the Project within the Site, subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the conditions of the Project Approvals and .the Applicable rules. Therefore, the City hereby agrees and acknowledges that: (a) Entitlement to Develol~. The Developer is hereby granted the vested right to develop the Project on the Site to the extent and in the manner provided in this Agreement, subject to the conditions of the Project Approvals, the Applicable Rules and the Future Approvals. (b) Conflicting Fnactments. Any change in the Applicable Rules, including, without limitation, any change in any applicable general, area or specific plan, zoning, subdivision or building regulation, adopted or becoming effective after the Effective Date, including, without limitation, any such change by means of an ordinance, initiative, resolution, policy, order or moratorium, initiated or instituted for any reason whatsoever and adopted by the Council, the Planning Commission or any other board, commission or department of City, or any officer or employee thereof, or by the electorate, as the case may be, which would, absent this Agreement, otherwise be applicable to the Site and which would conflict in any way with or be more. restrictive than the Applicable Rules ("Subsequent Rules"), shall not be applied by City to the Site. Developer may give City written notice of its election to have any Subsequent Rule applied to the Property, in which case such Subsequent Rule shall be deemed to be an Applicable Rule. (c) Permitted Conditions. Provided Developer's applications for any Future Approvals are consistent with this Agreement and the Applicable Rules, City shall grant the Future Approvals in accordance with the Applicable Rules and authorize development of the Property for the uses and to the density of the Project described herein. City shall have the right to impose reasonable conditions in connection with Future Approvals and, in approving tentslive subdivision maps, impose dedications for rights of way or easements for public access, utilities, water, sewers, and drainage necessary for the Project; provided, however, such conditions and dedications shall not be inconsistent with the Applicable Rules or Project Approvals, nor inconsistent with the development of the Project as contemplated by this Agreement. Developer may protest any conditions, R:~-'rAFFI~GREBVBfr. OT e/'//e6 Idb 5 dedications or fees while continuing To develop The Site; such · protest by Developer shall not delay or stop The issuance of building permits or certificates of occupancy. (d) Term of Mq~(s) end Other Prcdect AS~Drovmls. Pursuant To Califomia Govemrnent Code Sections 66452.6(1 ) and 65863.9, The term of any subdivision or parcel map That may be processed on all or any portion of The Site and The term of each of The Project Approvals, including The Tentative Map and any Future Approvals shall be extended for a period of time Through The scheduled termination date of This Agreement as set forth in Section 14 below. (e) Timing of Development. Because The Califomia Supreme CoUrt held in Pardee Construction Co. V. City of Camarillo, 37 Cal.3d 465 (1984), That failure of the parties to provide for The timing of development resulted in a later adopted initiative restricting The timing of development to prevail over The parties' agreement, it is The Developer's and City's intent to cure That deficiency by acknowledging and providing That Developer shall have The right (wiThout obligation) to develop The Site in such order and at such rate and at such time as Developer deems appropriate within The exercise of its subjective business judgement. (f) MoraTori-m. No City-imposed moratorium or oTher limitation ... (whether relating to The rate, timing or sequencing of The development or construction of all or any part of The Site, wheTher imposed by ordinance, initiative, resolution, policy, order or oTherwise, and wheTher enacted by The Council, an agency of City, The electorate, or oTherwise) affecting parcel or subdivision maps (wheTher tentative, vesting tentative or final), building permits, occupancy certificates or oTher entitlements to use or service (including, wiThout limitation, water and sewer) approved, issued or granted wiThin City, or portions of City, shall apply to The Site to The extent such moratorium or oTher limitation is in conflict with this Agreement; provided, however, The provisions of This Section shall not affect City's compliance wiTh moratoria or other limitation mandated by oTher governmental agencies or court-imposed moratoria or other limitation. (g) Permitted Fees. Except as oTherwise provided in This Agreement, and specifically excluding fees set by entities not controlled by C'.m/ that are collected by City, City shall only charge and impose Those fees and exactions, including, wiThout limitation, dedications and any oTher fees or taxes (including excise, construction or any oTher taxes) relating to development or The privilege of developing, which are in effect on a City-wide basis as of The Effective Date. This Section shall not be construed to limit The auThority of City to charge application, processing, and permit fees for land use approvals, building permits, and oTher similar permits and entitiements, which fees are designed to reimburse City's expenses attributable to such application, processing and permitting and are in force and effect on a City-wide basis at such time as said approvals, permits, or entitlements are granted by City. 9.' Cooperation and Imnlementation. The City agrees That it will R:%STAFFFFrV~GREEMNT.OT 6/7/95 klb 6 cooperate with Developer to the fullest extent reasonable and feasible to implement this Agreement. Upon satisfactory performance by Developer of all required preliminary conditions, actions and payments, the City will commence and in a timely manner proceed to complete all steps necessary for the implementation of this Agreement and the development of the Project or Site in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. Developer shall, in a timely manner, provide the City will all documents, plans, and other information necessary for the City to carry out its obligations. Specffically: (a) Further Assurences: Covenent to Sign Doc, jments. Each party shall take all actions and do all things, and execute, with acknowledgment or affidavit, if required, any and all documents and writings, that may be necessary or proper to achieve the purposes and objectives of this Agreement. (b) Reimbursement and Aoportionment. Nothing in this Agreement precludes City and Developer from entering into any reimbursement agreements for the portion (if any) of the cost of any dedications, public facilities and/or infrastructure that City may require as conditions of the Project Approvals or the Future Approvals, to the extent that they are in excess of those reasonably necessary to mitigate the impacts of the Project. (c) Processing. Upon satisfactory completion by Developer of all required preliminary actions and payments of appropriate processing fees, if any, City shall, subject to all legal requirements, promptly initiate diligently process, complete at the earliest possible time all required steps, and expeditiously grant any approvals and permits necessary for the development by Developer of the Property in accordance with this Agreement, including, but not limited to, the following: (1) the processing of applications for and issuing of all discretionary approvals requiring the exercise of judgement and deliberation by City, including without limitation, the Future Approvals; (2) the holding of any required public hearings; (3) the processing of applications for and issuing of all ministerial approvals requiring the determination of conformance with the Applicable Rules, including, without limitation, site plans, development plans, land use plans, grading plans, improvement plans, building plans and specifications, and ministerial issuance of one or more final maps, zoning clearances, grading permits, improvement permits, wall permits, building permits, lot line adjustments, encroachment permits, conditional and temporary use permits, certificates of use and occupancy and approvals and entitlements and related matters as necessary for the completion of the development of the Property ("Ministerial Approvals"). (d) Processing During Third Party Litigation. The filing of any third party lawsuit(s) against City or Developer relating to this Agreement or to other development issues affecting the Property shall not delay or stop the development, processing or construction of the Project, approval of the Future Approvals, or R:~TAFFRIrPV~REEMNT.OT 8/7/96 klb 7 issuance of Ministerial Approvals, unless the third party obtains a court order preventing the activity. City shall not stipulate to the issuance of any such order. (e) St-ta. Feder-I or Cese I ew. Where any state, federal or case law allows City to exercise any discretion or take any act with respect to that law, City shall, in an expeditious and timely manner, at the earliest possible time, (a) exercise its discretion in such a way as to be consistent with, and carry out the terms of, this Agreement and (b) take such other actions as may be necessary to carry out in good faith the terms of this Agreement. (f) Other Rovernmental Bodies, to the extent that City, its Cou.ncil, Planning Commission or any other City agency constitutes and sits as any other board or agency, it shall not take any action that conflicts with City's obligations under this Agreement. (g) Defense of Agreement. City shall take all actions which are necessary or advisable to uphold the validity and enforceability of this Agreement, subject to the indemnffication provisions of this subparagraph. If this Agreement is adjudicated or determined to be invalid or unenforceable, City agrees, subject to all legal requirements, to consider modifications to this Agreement to render it valid and enforceable to the extent permitted by applicable law. The Developer shall indemnify, protect, defend, and hold harmless, the City and any agency or instrumentality thereof, and/or any of its officere, employees and agents from any and all claims, actions, or proceedings against the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its officers, employees and agents, to attack, set aside, void, annul or seek monetary damages resulting from the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning this Agreement which action is brought within the appropriate statute of limitation period and Public Resources code, Division 13, Chapter 4 (Section 21000 et saq., including but not by way of limitations Section 21152 and 21167). City shall promptly notify the Developer of any claim, action, or proceeding brought within this time period. The City shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. Should the City fail to either promptly notify or cooperate fully, Developer shall not thereafter be responsible to indemnify, defend, protect, or hold harmless the City, any agency or instrumentality thereof or any of its officers, employees, or age.nts. 10. Review of Comoliance, (a) Periodic Review, The Director of Planning of the City shall review this Agreement annually, on or before the anniversary of the Effective Date, in accordance with the procedure and standards set forth in this Agreement and the Temecula Municipal Code in order to ascertain compliance by the Developer with the terms of this Agreement. {b) Procedure. During a periodic review, the Developer shall be required to demonstrate good faith compliance with the terms of this Agreement. The burden of proof on this issue shall be on the Developer. The parties R:%STAFFFIrT~GREBRNT.OT 6r/J6 Idb 8 acknowledge that failure by the Developer to demonstrate good faith compliance shall constitute grounds for termination or modification of this Agreement in accordance with Government Code § § 65865.1. (c) Cure of Defm :It. If, on the basis of review of this Agreement, the Director of Planning concludes that the Developer has not complied in good faith with the terms of this Agreement, then the Director of Planning may issue a written "Notice of Non-compliance" specifying the ground therefor and all facts demonstrating such non-compliance. The Developer's failure to cure or commence and diligently pursue the cure of the alleged non-compliance within thirty (30) days after receipt of said notice, shall constitute a default under this Agreement, subject to possible termination of the Agreement as provided below. Upon completion of a periodic review, the Director of Planning shall submIt a report to the City Council setting forth the evidence concerning good faith compliance by the Developer with the terms of this Agreement and the recommended finding on that issue. 11. Proceedinos Uoon TerminAtion. If the City determines to proceed with termination of this Agreement, the City shall give written notice to the Developer of its intention to terminate this Agreement and comply with the notice and public hearing requirements of Government Code § § 65868 and 65867. At the time and place set for the hearing on termination, the Developer shall be given an opportunity to be heard. If the City Council finds, based upon substantial evidence, that the Developer has not reasonably complied in good faith with the terms or conditions of this Agreement, the City Council may modify or terminate this Agreement. 12. Modification. Amendment. or Cancellation. Subject to the notice and hearing requirements of Section 65867 of the Government Code, this Agreement may be modified or amended from time to time by mutual consent of the parties or their successors in interest in accordance with the provisions of the Temecula Municipal Code and Section 65868 of the Government Code. 13. Operation Agreement. The provisions of this Agreement require a close degree of cooperation between City and Developer and the refinements and further development of the Project may demonstrate that clarifications are appropriate with respect to the details of performance of City and Developer. If and when, from time to time, during the term of this Agreement, City and Developer agree that such clarifications are necessary or appropriate, they shall effectuate such clarifications through operating memoranda approved by City and Developer, which, after execution, shall be attached hereto, and may be further clarified from time to time as necessary with future approval by City and Developer. No such operating memoranda shall constitute an amendment to this Agreement requiring public notice or hearing. The City Attorney shall be authorized to make the determination whether a requested clarification may be effectuated pursuant to this Section or whether the requested clarification is of such a character to constitute an amendment hereof pursuant to Section 12. The City Manager may execute any operating memoranda hereunder without Council action. R:~q'r~GREEMNT.OT 6/7/95 Idb 9 14. Term of Anreement. This Agreement shall become operative and commence upon the Effective Date. It shall remain in effect until [Term - to be 10 years] unless this Agreement is terminated, modffied, or extended upon' mutual written consent of the parties hereto. Following the expiration of said term, this Agreement shall be deemed terminated and of no further force and effect; provided, such termination shall not automatically affect any right of the City or Developer arising from City approvals on the Site prior to the expiration of the term. and arising from the duties of the parties as prescribed in this Agreement. 15. I eaal Action. Any party may, in addition to any other ~ighte or remedies, institute legal action to cure, correct or remedy any default, enforce any covenant or agreement herein, enjoin any threatened or attempted violation hereof, or enforce by specffic performance the obligations and rights of the parties hereto, except as provided in this subparagraph. It is acknowledged by the parties that City would not have entered into this Agreement if it were to be liable in damages for a default under or with respect to this Agreement or the application thereof and that Developer has adequate remedies other than damages to secure Clty's compliance with City's obligations pursuant to this Agreement. City, and its officers, employees and agents, shall not be liable in damages to Developer or to any assignee, transferee of Owner, or any other person for its default under or with respect to this Agreement, and Developer covenants not to sue for or claim any damages for default of this Agreement by City. Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 638, etsea., all legal actions shall be heard by a referee who shall be a retired judge from either the Superior Court, the California Court of Appeal, the United States District Court or the United STates Court of Appeals, provided that the selected referee shall have experience in resolving land use and real property disputes. Developer and City shall agree upon a single referee who shall then try all issues, whether of fact or law, and report a finding and judgement thereon and issue all legal and equiTable relief appropriate under the circumstances of the controversy before such referee. If Developer and City are unable to agree on a party hereto, either party may seek to have one appointed pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 640. The cost of such proceeding shall initially be borne equally by the parties. Any referee selected pursuant to this Section shall be considered a temporary judge appointed pursuant to Article 6, Section 21 of the California Constitution. 16. Administr-tion of Agreement and Resolution of Disputes. All decisions by the City staff concerning the interpretation and administration of this Agreement and the Project which is the subject hereof are appealable to the City Project which is the subject hereof are appealable to the City Council and all like decisions of the City Council shall also be subject to judicial review pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.5 or any other applicable provision of law or equity. The resolution of disputes shall be conducted pursuant to the provisions of Section 15 of this Agreement. 17. Transfers and Assignments. F~TAFFRFT%AGREEIVlNT.OT e/7/SS klb 10 (a) Right to Assign. Developer shall have the right to sell, assign or transfer all or portions of the real property compdsing the Property to any person at any time during the term of this Agreement. (b) I iebilities Ul~on Transfer. Upon the delegation of all duties and obligations and the sale, transfer or assignment of all or any portion of the Property, Developer shall be released from its obligations under this Agreement with respect to the Property, or portion thereof, so transferred arising subsequent to the effective date of such transfer if (i) Developer has provided to City ten days' written notice of such transfer and (ii) the transferee has agreed in writing to be subject to all of the provisions hereof applicable To the portion subject to all of the provisions hereof applicable to the portion of the Property so transferred. Upon any transfer of any portion of the Property and the express assumption for Developer's obligations under this Agreement by such transferee, City agrees to look solely to the transferee for compliance by such transferee with the provisions of this Agreement as such provisions relate to the portion of the Property acquired by such transferee. A default by any transferee shall only affect hat portion of the Property owned by such transferee and shall not cancel or diminish in any way Developer's rights hereunder with respect to any portion of the Property not owned by such transferee. The transferee shall be responsible for the reporting and annual review requirements relating to the portion of the Property owned by such .. transferee, and any amendment to this Agreement between City and a transferee shall only affect the portion of the Property owned by such transferee. 18. Mortgage Protection. The parties hereto agree that this Agreement shall not prevent or limit Developer, in any manner, at Developer's sole discretion, form encumbering the Property or any portion thereof or any improvement thereon by any mortgage, deed of trust or other security device securing financing with respect to the Property. City acknowledges that the lender(s) providing such financing may require certain Agreement interpretations and modifications and agrees upon request, from time to time, to meet with Developer and representatives of such lender(s) to negotiate in good faith any such request for interpretation or modification. City will not unreasonable withhold its consent to any such requested interpretation or modification provided such interpretation or modification is consistent with the intent and purposes of this Agreement. Any mortgagee of a mortgage or a beneficiary of a deed of trust ("Mortgagee") on the Property shall be entitled to the following rights and privileges: (a) Neither entering into this Agreement nor a breach of this Agreement shall defeat, render invalid, diminish, or impair the lien of any mortgage or deed of trust on the Property made in good faith and for value. (b ) The Mortgagee of any mortgage or deed of trust encumbering the Property, or any part thereof, who has submitted a request in writing to City in the manner specified herein for giving notices, shall be entitled to receive written notification from City of any default by Developer in the performance of Developer's obligations under this Agreement. R:~'TAFFRPT~REEIVINT. OT 6.mS Idb 11 (c) If City timely receives a request from a Mortgage requesting a copy of any notice of default given to Developer under the terms of this Agreement, City shall provide a copy of that notice to the Mortgagee within ten days of sending the notice of default to Developer. The Mortgagee shall have the right, but not the obligation, to cure the default during the remaining cure period allowed such party under this Agreement. (d) Any Mortgagee who comes into possession of the Property, or any part thereof, pursuant to foreclosure of the mortgage or deed of trust, or deed in lieu of foreclosure, shall take the Property, or part thereof, subject to the terms of this Agreement; provided, however, in no event shall such Mortgagee be liable for any defaults or monetary obligations of Developer arising prior to acquisition of title to the Property by such Mortgagee, except that any such Mortgagee or its successors or assigns shall not be entitled to a building permit or occupancy certificate until all delinquent and current fees and other monetary obligations due under this Agreement for the Property, or portion thereof acquired by such Mortgagee, have been paid to City. 19. Notices. All notices under this Agreement shell be in writing and shell be effective when personally delivered or upon receipt after deposit in the United States mail as registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, retum receipt requested, to the following representatives of the parties at the addresses indicata~i below: If to City: City of Temecula Attention: City Manager 43174 Business Park Drive Tamecula, CA 92590-3606 With a Copy to: Peter M. Thorson, Esq. Burke, Williams & Sorensen 611 West Sixth Street, 25th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90017 If to Developer: Mr, Eugene S. Hancock, President Hancock Development Company, Inc. 3183 Airway Avenue, Building E Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Stevan J. Gromet, Esq. Pinto, Gromet, Dubia & Worcester Two Park Plaza, Suite 300 Irvine, CA 92714-8513 Mr. John F. Firestone 702 South Laurinda Avenue Orange, CA 92669 R:~rAFFRPT~QREB4NI'.OT an/as klb 12 With a Copy to: Ronald I. Silverman, Esq. Cox, Castle & Nicholson 2049 Century Park East, 28th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90067-3284 Samuel C., Alhadeff, Esq. Lorenz, Alhadeff, Cannon & Rose 27555 Ynez Road, Suite 203 Temecula, CA 92591-4677 20. Severability end Termination. If any provision of this Agreement is determined by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid or unenforceable, or if any provision of this Agreement is superseded or rendered unenforceable according to any law which becomes effective after the Effective Date, the remainder of this Agreement shall be effective to the extent the remaining provisions are not rendered impractical to perform, taking into consideration the purposes of this Agreement. 21. Time of Essence. Time is of the essence for each provision of this Agreement of which time is an element. 22. Force Majeure. In the event of changed conditions, changes in local,... state or federal laws or regulations, floods, delays due to strikes, inability to obtain materials, civil commotion, fire, acts of god, or other circumstances which substantially interfere with carrying out the Project, as approved by the City, or with the ability of either party to perform its obligations under this Agreement, and which are not due to actions of Developer and are beyond its reasonable control, the parties agree to bargain in good faith to modify such obligations to achieve the goals and preserve the original intent of this Agreement. 23. Waiver. No waiver of any provision of this Agreement shall be effective unless in writing and signed by a duly authorized representative of the party against whom enforcement of a waiver is sought. 24. Constructive Notice and Acceptance. Every person who, now or hereafter, owns or acquires any right, title or interest in or to any portion of Site is, and shall be,-conclusively deemed to have consented and agreed to every provision contained herein, whether or not any reference to this Agreement is contained in the instrument by which such person acquired an interest in the Site. 25. No Third Party Beneficiaries. This Agreement is made and entered into for the sole protection and benefit of the parties, the City Council and their successors and assigns. No other person shall have any right of action based upon any provision of this Agreement. 26. Attorney's Fees. If either party commences any action for the interpretation, enforcement, termination, cancellation or rescission of this Agreement, or for specific performance for the breach hereof, the prevailing party R:'~rAFF!~REEI~'~r. OT entes ke, 13 shall be entitled to its reasonable attorney's foes, litigation expenses and costs. Attorney's fees under this Section shall include attorney's fees on any appeal as well as any attorney's fees incurred in any post-judgement proceedings to collect or enforce the judgernent. 27. Incorooration of Fxhibits. The following Exhibit is part of this Agreement and each of which are incorporated heroin by this reference: Exhibit No. A Legal Description of Site 28. Entire Agreement: Conflicts. This Agreement represents the entire, agreement of the parlies. Should any or all of the provisions of this Agreement be found to be in conflict with any other provision or provisions found in the Project Approvals, Applicable Rules, or Subsequent Applicable Rules, then the provisions of this Agreement shall prevail. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have each executed this Agreement of the date first written above. CITY OF TEMECULA By: Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter M. Thereon City Attorney HANCOCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY INC. President John F. Firestone R:~"TAFFRPT~AGR~,OT 0/7/96 Idb 14 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF On ,19 before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said state, personally appeared and , known to me to the persons who executed the within instrument as Mayor and City Clerk, respectively, of the CITY OF TEMECULA, the public agency therein named, and acknowledged to me that such Commission executed the within instrument pursuant to its bylaws or a resolution of its members. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Name (typed or printed) STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SS, On , 19 before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said state, personally appeared , known to me to be President of and , known to me to be the Secretary of the corporation that executed the within instrument, known to be to be the persons who executed the within instrument of behalf of HANCOCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC., the Corporation therein named, and acknowledged to me. that such Corporation executed the within instrument pursuant to its bylaws or a resolution of its board of directors. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Name (typed or printed) R:%STAFFRPT%AGREBVlNT.OT 6/7/95 Idb 15 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF On ,19 before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said state, personally appeared , personally known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that he/she executed the same. WITNESS my hand and official seal. (SEAL) Notary Public in and for said ,State R:~STAFFRPT~AG~.OT en/o6 kb 16 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SITE R:~'I'AFFRFT',AGREEMNT.OT 8/7/96 Idb 17 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DV95-0001 The following areas are part of the Westside Specific Plan and are included in, and subject, to this Agreement: eli · Parcels 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, and 29 of Parcel Map 18254 on file in Book 116, Page 69 through 78 of Parcel Maps, Records of Riverside County, California. Those unconstructad portions of First Street that were created by abovementioned Parcel Map 18254 and are generally located between abovementioned Parcels 23, 24, 25, and 26. Those portions of Calle Cerillo-that were created by abovementioned Parcel Map 18254 and are immediately east of abovementioned Parcels 26, 27, 28, and 29. Those portions of Via Santa Rosa that were created by abovementioned Parcel map 18254 and bisects abovementioned Parcel 29. R:%STAFF~GFIEEMNT.OT 6/7/95 Idb 18 ATTACHMENT NO. 7 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MAY '15, 1995 R:\FORMS~STAFFFFF.CC 6/7/95 klb 80 ~'m~ORANDUM PROM: DATE: SUBIF. CF: p!-nniqg Commi-~i~ Gary Thornhill, ~ of plnnnin~ ~t May 1~, 1995 Staff ~ for l :""J',s AFP!~'tso~ No. 9S-0003 - Westside Spedik Phn, Ps-nnkV ~ No. 95-0004 - Tt,dsfi,c Tract. Map No. 28011, · -nnt~ AMdlmfiom No. 94-M61 - Master Co-,smon-! Use Permit; · -nnbq, Applimion No. 9Sdl031 - Ea,vlaom,smlal TmlPct Rel~rt and Development Agzmsm~ No. DV9~0001 It is my feeling that this format will facilitate the Commissiom' review of the projects. Items attached to this memorandum, in order, are as fonows: 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. Staff Recommend~ons and Appficant Information- Blue Page 2 Project Description and Statistics - Blue Page 4 Staff Report: Project Backgro~, Project Analysis, Sunrotary of Environmew~z Issues, General Plan Consistency, Specific Plan Consistency, Conclusions - Blue Page 6 Resolution No. 9~- Final Environmental Impact Report (Plannina Application No. 9~- 0031), Fmdings of Fact and Sfnfe,,r,n~ of Overriding Consideration and Monitoring Program - Blue Page 18 Resolution No. 95- Westside Specific Plan (Planning Application No. 9~-0003) and Change of Zone and Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 23 Draft Ordinance No. 9~- Ordinance of the City Cotmcfi of the City of Ternectda P, menc!i~g the Official Zoning Map - Blue Page 41 Resolution No. 9~- Master Conditional Use Permit (Planning Application No. 94-0061) and condirlom of Approval - Blue Page 44 Resolution No. 9~- Tentative Tract Map No. 28011 (Planning Application No. 9~-0004) and Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 60 Resolmion No. 9~- Development Agreement No. DV9~-0001 - Blue Page 83 EIR Response to Commem~ - Blue Page 88 Exhibits - Blue Page 89 · '~rASS~U~.~ m~S ,p 1 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS ATrAC]~ NO. ~ ~, ~F.~OHHENDATIONS PROVtDr ~ to ~ulff rqirdin~ 11.8 net acres of High Density Residemtis, devdopmem: h PlanninS ,*,read of PAg',0003, Westside Specific Plan; and ~krloFr Ruohttion No. 9~- re. co...,-t .,.-ling approval of Westside Specific Plan (PAgI-{XXD) and the C!aange of Zone titan R-A-20 (Reslde~pip, Agricultural, 20 acre mlnlmnm parcel size). to sP (Specmc Sa) based upon dae Amdysis and FmdinSs comined .,the StafrRepon and subject to the p~tfche6 Comiidons of Approval; and ,&hOlT Resohadon No. 95- rtcom,,.-,~Ung approval ofD~l, DeveloLaeat AFc,.mea for the Westside Specific Plan based upon the Analysis and Faxihgs contained in the Staff ARSON Resolution No. 95- reco.6...,,vJing approval of ptaenh,_~ Appficafion No. 95-0094 (Tastsfive Tract Map No. 28011) based upon the Analysis and Findings comained in the Staff Report and abject to the nfkn~hed Condidom of Approval; and ,ADOPT Resolution No. 95- recommeDdin..~ approval of Master Conditional Use Permit (PA94-(X)61) based upon the Analysis and Findings comined in the Staff Report and abject to the attached Condidom of Approval; and ,&nOPT l~.esohtion No. ~ recommem'lin.~ approval of Ordlnnnee No. Ordinance No. 348 of the City of Temeads. APPLICATION INFORMATION Planning Application No. 95-0003 - Westside Spedtic Plan, ,, ~ AppUcadon No. 94-0004- Tentative Tract Map No. 28011 and DV9~ 0001 - Development AFeemmt: Gene Hancock, Hancock Developman Company Phtming App~cadou No. 94-0061 - Master Condidonal Use Permit: TZBG: Zev Buffsnan Planning Application No. 9S-0031 - En,ho .... .~ '-t Inspact Report: The City of Temecula Pimming Applieadoa No. 95.0003 & P!snning App~eation No. 94- 0004: Stephen G. McC~ms, AICP Phnning Appikadon No. 94-0061: WAT&0: Michael Paneft Development AF.m ~ t No. DV9S-0001: Sam A!hadeff ATTACHMENT NO. 2 PR~ DESCRIPHON AND STATISTICS ATTACI:IMm~ NO. 2 PROJECF DISCR1PIION AND STATISTICS m ~ Appr--em No. 94-0061 (Mamr Condi~o,,-, Use Permit). PLuning Application No. 94-0061 is for aMastff Co~ditlonal Use Pennit in Old Town Temec,,,, The projea hmdary is the same as that Cabaret Themr 1:26,096 square feet Cabaret Theater 2:44,471 square feet Saloons (2): 18,564 squrs tsst iolal Opera House: 84,462 squars fMt TV/Radio Studio: 2,10~ square fast Virtual Reality Compla: 15,01.S square feet Quicluiraw Co,,q,,xalon Arsa: 7,360 squars feet Adminism-~ion: ~,447 square feet Back of House: 10,3Z0 square feet Phsming .Api~a,.-0on No. 9S-0003 (WestsMe Specific Plsn) - a Specific Plan for appm?i...Mmly 154.1 gross acres. The Specific PLm comsnq dmign gu~defines and developmint stamdards thai apply area wide and to the individual Planning Areas. The projea contaim six planning arm ranging in size from 2.8 gross acres u> 67.4 gross acres. Within the Specific Plan thae are five (5) land use r]esi_mu~ons that correspond to the plmming areas. They are: Plannina Area ~ Gross Acr,~f,e Use rsesignsfion manning Arm A (47.7) PhnninS Area B (S.4) ~suninS Area C (18.1) PlsuninS Area D (12.7) plsnnin,o Area E (2.8) plnnnin=a Area F (67.4) Special Event Commercial NelShborhood Connercial High Density Reside-~i.1 High Density Residemlsl Mixed Use open Space Planning Application No. 950004 - Tentative Tract Map No. 280H - a nine parcel subdivision of 154.1 gross acres. PhnningApplicstionNo. 9$-0031-Envi~o ~ +allmpaetReportfortheOIdTownRedevelopment Project. Planning Application No. 9r~X)31 is a focused Environs lm~.sa Report for the Old Town P~clevelopment Project which includes the Westside Specific Plan, Master Conditional Use Perm~; and related infrastructure and development agreements. Development Agreement No. DV9S-0001. Hancock Development Company, acting as the Agent for the propmy owner, John Firesame, has requested a development agreanent to guarantee )dr. Fkestone's right to build the proj~t ~ its approval ATTACHMENT N0.3 STAFF REPORT INCLUDING PR~ BACKGROUND, PR~ ANALYSIS, SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL Rk~S, GENERAL PLAN COI~*xr.,NCY, SPECIFIC PLAN COI~aab*t'r.~/CY AND CONCLUSIONS ATTACHMENT NO. 3 STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION May 15, 1995 Ranrlng Apltcation No. 950003 - Westside Slxdfic Ran RaNting Apltcadon No. 95-0004 - Tentative Tract Map No. 28011 Planning ,~Y'm wdon No. 94-0061 - Marmr Conditional Use Permit Planning Apltcetion No. 95-0031 - Envirg~ ,kentel Impact Report Development Agreement No. DV95-0001 Prepared By: David Hogan, Associate Banner Matthew Fagan, Assistant Banner BACKGROUND Plannine Andications No. 94-0061 (M-star Conditional Use PerrnitL 95-0003 (Westside Snecific Ban) and 95-0004 (Tentative Tract Me· No. ~8011 ) Planning Application No. 94-0061 was submitted to the Banning Department on June 21, 1994. A Development Review Committee Meeting was held for this project on July 28, 1994. Banning Staff held several pre-application meetings with the applicant for Banning Applications No. 95-0003 and 95-0004 pdor to the formal submittal of the project. The applications for Banning Application No. 95-0003and Planning Application No. 95-0004were formally submitted on January 12, 1995. The Specific Ban text for Banning Application No. 95-0003 was submitted to the Banning Department on Apdl 17, 1995. A Development Review Committee (DRC) meeting was held on April 27, 1995 for Banning Applications No. 95-0003 and 95-0004. A joint Banning Commission/City Council Workshop was held on April 19, 1995 for the Old Town Redevelopment Project {Banning Application No. 95-0003 - Westside Specific Ban, Banning Application No. 95-0004- Tentative Tract Map No. 28011, Planning Application No. 94-0061 - Master Conditional Use Permit, and Banning Application No. 95-0031 - Environ. mental Impact Report). Planning Applications No. 94-0061,95-0003 and 95-0004 were deemed complete on May 1, 1995. Planning Aoolication No. 95-0031 (Environmental Imoact ReDoft for the Old Town Redevelooment Project} Preparation of the Final Initial Environmental Study for the Old Town Redevelopment Project started in May 1994. The Initial Environmental Study for the Redevalopment Project included the following major components: · · · · I · Master Conditional Use Permit; Westside Specific Ban; The Wastam By-Pass Road; The First Street bridge and extension; The ramp and interchange along Interstate 15; Additional parking facilities; and Associated financing and development agreements. The Study was finalized and the Notice of Preparation of an EnvironmentBI Impact Report (HOP) was issued June 23, 1994. The Initial Study 8rid HOP identified six potential issue areas of concern. The Notice of PreparBtion Study and the HOP am included in the Environmental Impact Report. The list of potentially significant environmental impact areas identified in the HOP ere: Air Quality, Animal end Plant Life, Cultural end Historic Resources, Land Ux, No~e and TranNxm Letion. Public agency and general community scoping meetings were held on June 14 and June 23, 1994 respectively. At the scoping meeting, some community residents expressed concerns about the visual impacts of the proposed project. As a result, Assthedce and Visual Impacts Sections wee added to the EIR. The review and comment parind for the Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) began on December 7, 1994 end ended on January 23, 1995. During this tim, copies of the DEIR. were available for public review at City Hell and the Temecula Library, Four copies of the DEIR were available to be checked out for at-home review. According to the Reference Librarian, 13 individuals borrowed a copy of the DEIR during the comment parind. Six agency comment letters were received during this period end one wee received after the comment period ended. No general public comments wee received. The public agencies that submitted comments were: Govarnor's Office of Planning Research, Caltrane, Army Corps of Engineers, Riverside County Transportation and Land Management Agency, City of Murrieta, and the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG). Devalooment Aareement No. nV95-0001 Hancock Development Company, acting as the Agent for the property owner, John Fireatone, has requested a development agreement to guarantee Mr. Firestons's right to build the project after its approval. ANALYSIS Plannina Aoolication No. 94-0061 (Master Conditional Use Permit) The City Council Adopted Ordinance No. 94-19 (Master Conditional Usa Permit Ordinance) in mid-1994, The Ordinance provides for the approval of project facilities or uses in general locations. It calls for subsequent approvals for site specific development proposals, These approvals can be made by the Planning Director at a publicly noticed hearing. However, the approval authority for the City of Temecula allows the Planning Director to refer matters to the Planning Commission at his discretion. The specific locations heva not been identified for the uses proposed in the Master Conditional Usa Permit at this time, hence the submittal of the Master CUP application. Upon approval of the Master CUP, and submittal of subsequent development plans at specific sites, the plans will be reviewed by the Old Town Local Review Board for consistency with the Old Town Specific Plan and scheduled for public hearing. The project boundary is the same as that of the Tourist Retail Core Boundary identified in the Old Town Specific Plan (reference Exhibit C). Proposed uses ir~lude: cabaret theaters (2), saloons (2), an opera house, a TViradio studio, a virtual reality complex, a quickdraw competition area, a central ticket office/Visitor center, an administration area, and aback of house area. ~'~ Fqennirm Annlic:efion No. 95-O00-q IWesteide Rnecific The Westside Specific Ran fulfills the requirement contained in the City's General Ran which calls for areas identified as Slmecific Ran Ovaday, with an aggregate area of 100 or more acres to be approved as 8 specify'plan prior to approval of any discretionary land use entitlement or issuance of any building or grading permit. Further, the General Ran key objective for this Specific Ran Area is to: "provide complementary land uses to Old Town that increase the vitality of the area and to increase the range of housing opportunities west of I-15." :'The Specific Ran includes uses in each Planning Area which help 8train this objective. Planning Area A is designated Special Event Commercial and proposes uses such as a Wild West Arena, commercial development and a hotel. Ranning Area A uses will tie into the Old Town Temecula Specific Plan uses as well as the uses proposed in the Old Town' Redevalopment Project. Planning Area B is designated Neighborhood Commercial and proposes uses that are similar to the draft Development Code's Neighborhood Commercial designation. This commercial development will serve existing and future high density residential development. Planning Areas C and D are proposed to be high density residential ( 13-20 dwelling un'ms per acre). Planning Area E is proposed as mixed use, relating either to the business perk designation to the north or the Special Event Commercial to the south. Area F is proposed to remain in its natural state and have an Open Space land use designation;. The Specific Plan contains area wide design guidelines for architecture. Again, the architecture shares the same theme as the Old Town area. The Westside Specific Plan architectural styles are esdy California themes including: Western, Spanish Colonial and Monterey themes. These themes ere contained within the Old Town Temecula Specific Plan. The Specific Plan also contains area wide grading, landscaping, paving, and signage criteria. These criteria also can be found in the Old Town Temecula Specific Plan. Additional detail has been included in the Westside Specific Plan for each individual Planning Area. Each Planning Area discusses circulation (vehicular, pedestrian and transit), additional design guidelines specific to the Planning Area, and development regulations. Staff has reviewed the uses contained in the Development Regulations for each Planning Area for consistency with the projects' overall goals. Staff has determined that the project does attain these goals. Plannino Application No. 95-0004 rFentative Tract Mao No. 98011 ) The tentative map is consistent with the City's General Plan, Ordinance No. 460 (Subdivision Ordinance) and the State Subdivision Map Act. Access to the project is from an existing dedicated right-of-way {First Street). The applicant is requaedng that Calls Cerillo and portions of First Street and Via Santa Rose be vacated as pert of the map process. These streets will be required to be vacated prior to the recordstion of the final map(a). Plannine AoDliCation No. 95-0031 (Fnvironmental Imnect RePort for the Old Town Redevelooment Proiect) The Initial Environmental Study (IES) and Environmental Impact Report (EIR) addressed 15 environmental impact issue areas. The following eight impact areas were evaluated in the IES end found to either be k~siu, ~11: f tit or ff~tigatable: geology end erosion, light end glare, natural resources, heirdous materiBis, population and housing, public services and utilities, recreation, end water quality. The remaining 7 impact ereas were analyzed in the Environmental Impact ReporC The enviroranental issue areas included in the EIR ere: aesthetics and visual impacts, air quality, animal end plant fife, cultural and historic resources, land use, noise, end transportation. A die~-,asion of each EIR issue is presented below. AESTHETICS. The potential aesthetic and visual impacts from the proposed project were bid.fly raised by · member of the community during the punic aceping meeting that was held in June, 1994. The primary concam were the impacts which would result from locating · roadway and wild west arena on the escarpment. To evaluate this visual impact on the community, · detailed visual impact analysis was done for the arena, hotel, end Western By-Pass Road. The analysis was done using standard visual impact analysis methodology. Based upon an analysis of the eight identifmd viewpoints, and an analysis of the before and after images, it was determined that the-. project would not heva · significant impact on the visual environment. AIR QUAUTY. The potential for the project to affect regional air quality was identified in the Initial Environmental Study. -The Air Quality Study determired that the amounts of some air pollam would exceed Air Quality Management District. pound par day limitations. Even after the identified mitigation measures ere implemented, the daily standards for Nitrogen Oxides era expected to be exceeded during the construction phase. In terms of the long-term impacts, the project will exceed Air Quality Management District pound par day limitations for Nitrogen Oxides, Carbon Monoxide, and Raactiva Organic Gases. Even with the midgetion measures identified in the EIR, the impacts on regional air quality cannot be mitigated to · level of insignificance. In comparison, other local developments generate significandy more daily air polluteeta. At build out, the Red Hawk Specific Plan is expend to generate 3 times as much air pollution; while the approved Regional Center Specific Plan is expected to generate over 10 times as much air pollution. Local air quality is not expected to be significantly affected by this project because regional air movement patterns remove locally generated air pollution from the valley. This impact requires a Statement of Overriding Considerations. e ANIMAL AND PLANT UFE. The potential impacts on biologic resources were also evaluated in the EIR. Comprehensive field studies were undome between May and August of 1994. The primary concerns were the potential impacts on the Stephens Kangaroo Rat, California Gnatcatcher, and other threatened and endangered species found in the riparian areas. The study found the following: · e e No Stephens Kangaroo Rate were identified; Portions of the escarpment are occupied by the California Gnatcatcher; and The dparian area supported a population of Southwestern Pond Turtles. According to the EIR, implementation of the midgedon measures identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Program is expected to reduce any impacts to these species to a level of insignificance. · .~va~m,~o~v~c ~ ,v 10 CULTURAL AND HISTORIC RESOURCE. Because of the historic claremr of Old Town Temecula, the poten:~i~l impacts .on cultual and historic resources were also cormidered in the EIR. Any impsca to historic facird~es win be addressed and mitigated by complying with the provisions of the Old Town Specific Plan. Overall, no significant impacts were identified. LAND USE. The land use issues of project compatibility end plan consistency were identified in the IES. The analysis in the EIR i,~licned that, while the exact percentages of the various land uses will shift, the overall character of the Westside Specific Plan will not significantly change. Also, the land uses proposed by the Master Conditional Usa Permit are consistent with the Old Town Specific Plan. As a result, no significant impacts were identified. NOISE. The potential for the project to affect ambient noise levels was identified in the Initial Environmental Study. Like air quality, the noise analysis was prepared for both- construction and operation. Based upon the Study, .it was determined some construction related noise impacts would remain significant even with the identified mitigation measures. Because of the ambient freeway noise in the area, no significant long-term commurdty noise impacts were identified. This impact requires s Statement of Overriding Considerations. TRANSPORTATION. The impact of the project on the City's circulation and transportation system was identified esdy in the planning process. Much of the projebt development process focused on addressing circulation issues. As a result, the needed road linkages end transportation mitigation measures have been integrated into the design of the project. The EIR determined that any impacts to the circulation and parking systems could be mitigated to · level of insignificance with the included project components and other mitigation measures included in the EIR. The IES and EIR both identifmd mitigation measures that will reduce or eliminate the impacts on the environment associated with this project. Because some of the air quality and noise impacts can not be mitigated to a level of insignificance, approval of these projects will require adoption of a Statement of Overriding Considerations. Iss-es Raised st the Joint Plenninn nommi-~sion/~itv Cejncil Workshon Several issues were raised at the Joint Planning Commission/City Council Workshop on April 19, 1995. The issues that were raised by the members of the Council and Commission were as follows: Planning Area D of the Westaide Specific Plan Planning Area D of the Westside SpacHic Plan consists of approximately 12.7 gross acres west of the Western By-Pass Corridor. The purpose of Area D is to provide for High Density Residential development {13 to 20 units par acre). Members of the Commission end Council were concerned about additional development west of the By-Pass Corridor. The concerns expressed included the foilowing: the aesthetic impact of development in this Planning Area on the community, the potential impacts on biologic resources and local open space resources, and providing additional "high density" residential in the Old Town area. Throughout The process, staff has 8iso been concerned with visibility, biology and open apere issues in this Planning Area. However, the 81}plirent has decided to leave Plmmb~ Area D in the proposed Plan. There am eveel options available to the Commission on this ismJe. D, providing for 81tarerive tees, or adding the area into open spare area (Planning Area F). Raverues Being Dram from OM Town to the Westside Specific Plan Concerns were raised that revenues from the estimated 50,000 square feet of commercial development located between the proposed hotel end arena in Planning Area A could compete with straggling business in the core of Old Town. While this issue is not expected to-'be a problem in the long-m, Staff is concerned about the potential impacts in the short-term. If the Cornminion is concerned with the competition issue, end believes that the additional commercial development in this area is appropriate, then it is recommended that this development be moved into future Phase III of the project, or that the commercial square.- footage be reduced in size so as not to compete with existing businesses. Timing of Infrlllna~e I~grOVl_,keAtS Concern was expressed regarding the timing of the required future infrastructure improvements needed to support the project. These improvements include the Western By- Pass Corridor, improvements to the Interchanges at Highway 79 South, Rancho California Road and Interstate 15, the First Street Bridge and extension, the extension of Vincent Moraga, and the perking facilities. The rimely completion of these infrastructure components is included in the proposed Conditions of Approval as described in the Environmental Impsot Report. Formation of an Aswfssrnent District for the Weetom By-Pen Corridor The future formation of an assessment district for the Western By-Pass Corridor was raised at the Joint Meeting. Specifically raised was whether or not the property owners in the area would support the proposed district. Staff stated that formation of the district had not yet started but that many of the property owners along the southern half of the route were either already conditioned not to oppose formation of the future district or would be specifically conditioned as pert of this approval. Staff has included this requirement as a Condition of Approval on the Westside Specific Plan. Reduction in the Number of Parking Spares Available at the 6th SUest Location At the joint meeting, concerns were expressed about the potential effect of relocating Temecula Shuttle's transit facility to the Sixth Street lot. In response, Staff evaluated the potential impeot from the relocation on the amount of off-street perking that could be provided. Based upon staff's review, it is estimated that relocsting the Temecula Shuttle facility to the city-owned lot would reduce the amount of public perking available by between 20 and 25 spaces. It is Steff's opinion that in terms of the potential advantages of having a transit facility in Old Town and the mall reduction in tie overall number of perking spaces, the relocatio~ will not have a significant impact to the overall perking situation in Old Town. ~-wr~.~.~w~.z~ snz~ss ,p 12 GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY Staff has reviewed the adopted City General Plan to determine the consistency of the project with the adopted Phm. Based upon this evaluation, the Director of Planning has determined that the projects are consistent with the adopted General Plan. Specifically. the projects are consistent with following goals anti policies contained in the General Plan: Lend Use 1.2: 2.1: 4.1: 6.4: 6.5: Require tile preparation of specific plane as designated on the Spacif,: Plan Overlay to achieve the comprehensive planning anti phasing of development anti infrastructure. Provide physical anti visual buffer ereas to oreate · transition between rural residential anti agricultural areas anti commercial, industrial anti other higher density residential development. ... Enforce hillside grading etantiards to ... recluire the preservation of unique natural-. features anti to encourage a broad range of hillside architectural anti site planning solutions. Develop a plan to provide for additional parking in anti around the Old Town area. Encourage the revitalizetion of Old Town through the Old Town Specific Plan. Circulation 1.2: 5.3: Require an evaluation of potential traffic impacts associated with new development prior to project approval, anti require adequate mitigation measures prior to, or concurrent with, project development. Provide additional public parking in the Old Town area, where feasible, through common perking areas or the establishment of a parking district. Housing 2.1: Promote a variety of housing opportunities that accommodate the needs of all income levels of the population, anti provides opportunities to meet the City's fair share of low- and moderate-income housing. Open Space 1.6: 3.1: 3.6: 5.1: 6.2: Encourage the enhancement and preservation of significant natural features. Require development proposals to identify significant biological resources anti provide mitigation, including the use of adequate buffering; selective preservation; the provision of replacement habitats: the use of sensitive site planning techniques including wildlife corridor/recreational trails; and other appropriate measures. Limit the recreational use of designated open space areas where sensitive biological resources are present. Pursue the conservation of the western anti southern ridgelines, ... through the development review process anti as a condition of approval. Require sites proposed for future development to be evaluated for archaeological resources in accordance with the procedure established in a Memorantium of Agreement with the Eastern Information Center at UC Riverside. ~m,r~rn~ smm ~, 13 6.3: 6.8: Require sites proposed for future development that are identified in this Element as being of high or undetermined paleontolngical es~ to be evaluated by a quality vertebrate peleontdogisL Ensure compeeilxqity between land uses Rod Ixdlding deigns in the Old Town Specific Plan Area aod areas adjacent to the Specific Plan area. Putic Fsci~des 5.5: Encourage the provision of cultural facities within the community, including: art museums, thatere, a performing am center, special exhibitions, an outdoor amphitheater, aod Iodian Cultural Interpreeive Center. Air QuBIity 2.6: 2.2: Encourage new development that provides employment opportunities for residents of:- Temecula to improve the balance of jobs relative to housing. Maintain an orderly flow of traffic eod improve mobility through the use of transportation systems management techniques. Commurdty Design 1.5: 7.1: 7.6: Maintain aod incorporate natural amenities ... to protect the environment aod provide natural laodscaping, protect views, aod to provide recreational opportunities in order to maintain the quality of life. Encourage the devaloprnent of public spaces aod plazas within commercial developments thee can accommodate cultural aod social events aod function as community gathering areas. Promote the provision of cultural facilities within the community, including: art museum, theaters, a performing arts' center, special exhibitions, an outdoor amphitheater, aod special cultural exhibitions. Economic Development 6.3: Revitalize aod enhance Old Town to expand its role in local tourisrn and to improve its attraotiveness, accessibility, and economic role. 6.4: Enhance the City's image through development of cultural facilities, including performing arts aod museums. No General Ran goals or policies were identified as being inconsistent with the proposed project. SPECIFIC PLAN CONSISTENCY The Master Cooditional Use Permit is located within the area of the Old Town Specific Ran. The Old Town Specific Plan was approvad by the City Council in February 1994. Staff has reviewed the Specific Plan to determine the consistency of the project with the adopted Ran. Based upon this evaluation, the Direotor of Planning has determined that the projects ere consistent with the adopted Specific Ran. Specifically, the projaN are consistent with following goals aod objectives contained in the adopted Ran: ~mm, r~n~c snms ,r,, 14 Overall Goal To create a dynamic "Old Town" commercial end residential core that is tactire end of high quality, respectful of its historic buildings and unifying design them and providing 8n economically viable setting for I mixture of local and tourist commercial uses, administretive/professional and residential uses with safe, efficient circulation and access. Commun~ Dedgn To create a high quality and distinct "Western" image and a functional, vibrant and aesthetically pleasing Old Town for Temecule. Objective: '- Enhance and promote the creation of enjoyable public spaces throughout Old Town through the use of street furniture, landscaping, public art, building design, and pedestrian orientation. Policies: Develop consistent streetecapa and architectural palettes for the Old Town that help create a high quality historic image. Require compliance with the Design Guidelines for the Old Town Specific Plan in new development or the expansion or redevelopment of existing development. Discourage significant lot consolidatibns and very large single-user [retail establishments] greater than 50,000 square feet in Old Town and encourage smaller storefront, pedestrian oriented design. Land Use/Economic Develop "Old Town" to provide a variety of local and tourist criented retail services, office, cultural/civic, and residential opportunities, Obiectives: Maximize the economic base of Old Town through the definition of land use districts to insure expansion of a variety of land uses desirable to the districts including, spaciaity retail, tourist end local serving retail uses, specialty ratail/service, office uses, and residential uses. Designate key sites within Old Town for a mixed-use "theme oriented" development and require master planning to assure coordinated access, parking, building orientation/location, and exclusive pedestrian access. Ensure the gradual tapgrade of under utilize parcels functioning st less than their market potential. pdiolee: Discourage new lend uses in Old Town such as automotive uses, fast food drive-thru's, a traditional shopping center, mini marts, and large grocery establishments. Establish public restrooms in the area. Promote the development of Old Town in a manner consistent with the Plan' and Memorandom of Understanding between the City of Temecula and Zev Buffman. Facilitate elfrelent and safe movement of people and vehicle within and through Old Town and to provide safe, adequate, end accessible perking in Old Town. Objectives: Provide additional vehicular creek crossings in Old Town, particularly at Santiago a~l First Streets. Create a pedestrian criented environment in the Old Town core. Provide easily identified, adequate and accessible perking with organized and consis- tent circulation systems throughout the Old Town area. Redirect local through traffic vehicular trips away from Front Street. Pdicies: Consider aitemstive routing of ~ru traffic to reduce congestion and enhance the pedestrian atmosphere of Old Town. Provide perking areas at the north and south end of the district with horse' drawn wagon/trolley serving Old Town during high traffic use periods. Locate perking and other public uses in areas behind, or off of, Front and Main Street or along Murriets Creek. No Specific Plan goals or policies were identified as being inconeistent with the proposed project. The majority of the policies and objectives in the Plan refer to the City's need to provide incentives and encouragement for redevelopment of the area and provide guidance on the nature and character of that development. In previous meetings, members of the public have expressed concerns that the Land Usa/Economic policy that states "Discourage major lot consolidation and development which encourages large single-user tenants on lots greater than 50,000square feet in Old Town" rendered the project inconsistent with the Specific Ran. This palicy was originally included in the Plan to discourage the location of large retail establishments such as discount stores or super markets from opening in Old Town and destroying the historic appearance and pedestrian character of the area. In addition, another policy stem that the city should 'Establish height limit zones in Old Town which relate to the scale of the streetscape, historic building construction techniques, and land use.' The Ixalx)se of this policy was ensure that all fuNre buildings would f~ in with the turn-of-the-century weetam town mode rather than to require that ell buildings be the same size or similar in appearance. CONCLUSIONS Two of the major components of the Old Town Redevelopment Project, the Westside Specific Plan and Master Conditional Usa Permit have been discussed in this Staff Report. Staff has reviewed these components and the overell project for consistency with the City's General-. Plan, the Old Town Temecula Specific Plan and existing City Ordinances. As discussed in the Staff Report, both project components met many of the goals and policies contained in the City's adopted General Plan. Further, the Master Conditional Use Permit meets the goals, objectives, and policies included in the Old Town Temecuia Specific Plan. The Redevelopment Project is expected to have a significant positive economic effect on the Old Town area and the City of Temecula. Based upon information contained in the Feasibility Study prepared by Price Waterhouse, it is estimated that revenues generated by this project will equal $86 million in 1997. Additional project benefrts include approximately 2,500 new jobs and providing the needed catalyst for the economic revitslization of Old Town. ~-~rAmu. rxom..,c ~ ,** 17 ATTACHMENT NO. 8 PLANNING COMMISSION MEMORANDUM AND SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM JUNE 5, 1995 R:~ONdSWl'AFFRF'r.CC 6n'/ss kJb 81 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Planning Commission Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning June 5, 1995 Planning Appication No. 960003- Weetlde Specific Plan, Plmming Applicadon No. 950004- Tentadve Tract limp No. 28011, Planning Appii~on No. 94- 0061 - Master Comadond Use Pendt, Plemlne Apeaceion No. 95-0031 - Environmental Impact Report and DevelopmeW: Aera aj~.e~d. No. DV95-0001 :. Prepared By: David Hogan, Associate Planner Matthew Fagan, Assistant Planner This memorandum will sewe to address the Planning Commission's concerns regarding the above referenced projects. No new conditions of approval have been prepared. This memorandum is to be used in conjunction with the packet you received for the May 15, 1995 meeting. Attachments to this memorandum are as follows: e Background and Analysis - Blue Page 2 e Mitigation Measure/Conditions of Approval Matrix - Blue Page 12 Resolution No. 95~.Final Environmental Impact Report (Planning Application No. 95- 0031 ), Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Consideration and Mitigation Monitoring Program - Blue Page 18 Resolution No. 95- Westside Specific Plan (Planning Application No. 95-0003)and Change of Zone - Blue Page 23 ' Draft Ordinance No. 95~ Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Temecula Amending the Official Zoning Map - Blue Page 28 Resolution No. 95- 0061) - Blue Page 31 Resolution No. 95-.__ 0004)- Blue Page 36 Resolution No. 95- Master Conditional Use Permit (Planning Application No. 94- Tentative Tract Map No. 28011 (Planning Application No. 95- Development Agreement No. DV95-O001 - Blue Page 41 Responses from WeStside Specific Plan Consultant - Blue Page 45 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS BACKGROUND These projects were originally before the Planning-Commission on May 15, 1995, At that meeting, the Planning Commission received presentations from Staff, the project applicants, and testimony from the public, The Banning Commission closed the public hearing, shared their concerns and comments with Staff, requested additional clarification on several items, and continued their deliberations to the June 5, 1995 hearing, The purpose of this Staff Report is to provide the requested information to the Commission, ANALYSIS The Commission's questions and concerns have been organized into the following categories: · General Comments; · Master Conditional Use Permit; · Westside Specific Ban; · Environmental Impact Report; and, Development Agreement. GENERAL COMMENTS 1, Question: WhBt is the alignment of the Western Bypass Corridor? Response: The initial alignment that is being used in this process is the preliminary alignment prepared for the City in 1992. The process for determining the final alignment and design of the road is currently underway in conjunction with the development of the Westside Specific Plan. Question: What will be the initial configuration (ie. number of lanes) for the Western Bypass Corridor? Response: Four vehicular travel lanes (two lanes par direction) will be necessary from the Interstate 15/State Route 79 south (I-15/SR79s) interchange to the west side of the proposed Western Bypass Corridor bridge over Murrieta Creek. From that point to the extension of Vincent Morega Drive, two vehicular travel lanes (one through lane per direction) will be adequate to accommodate the generated volume of traffic associated with the development of the first phase of the Master CUP/Westside Specific Plan. In addition, the extension of Vincent Moraga Drive will consist of three lanes (two through lanes and one turn lane). Question: Why does the Western Bypass Corridor stop at Vincent Moraga Drive? Why isn't it being built all the way to the City of Murriets as part of this project? Response: The connection of the Western Bypass Corridor to Rancho California Road is required to facilitate the movement of vehicular traffic in and around the Old Town area. The connection to Vincent Moraga is being recommended because it appears to R:%b"TAFFRPT~OTRP,PC2 5/28/95 3 be the most efficient and cost effective solution and adequately mitigates the impacts of this project on the City circulation system. There is no valid traffic nexus to require construction of the entire and ultimate alignment of -the Western Bypass Corridor to Murrieta. It is expected that other segments of the Western Bypass will he added in the future as needed to support other development projects and as additional funding is available. All phases of the Western Bypass Corridor are included in the Capital Improvement Program. Question: Are traffic signals going to be installed at Vincent Moraga? Response: According to the initial traffic study, developing the first phase of .the Master CUP/Westside Specific plan will not necessitate installation of traffic signals at the intersection of Vincent Moraga Drive and Rancho California Road. Question: What is the phasing, timing and size of the road improvements, especially the interface with the County on Assessment District 159 (AD 159)? Response: The traffic study prepared for the Old Town Redevelopment Project has recommended that all of the required roadway improvements (I-15/SR79s Interchange, the Extension of First Street, and the Western Bypass Corridor) be complete before the private entertainment vanusa are open. These improvements are described in the Traffic Engineer's report dated October 28, 1994 and consistent with the Assessment District's proposed improvements to SR-79s and the Interstate 15 ramps. All of these needed roadway improvements are all currently in the design and/or Caltrans approval processes. It is anticipated that the I O-month construction period the Western Bypass will begin in early 1996. Additional long term travel, transition, and turn lanes will be added as they are needed. The exact timing and funding sources for these future improvements can not be determined at this time. These long term improvements may include the construction of loop ramps to replace the current diamond interchange at I-15/SR-79s. Question: What will be the effects of road widening on properties along Pujol, Main, and First Streets? Response: The City will need to acquire the additional right-of-way for First Street, near the current intersection with Front Street and west of Pujol Street. The future First Street will consist of 4 vehicular travel lanes with bicycle lanes. The widths and configurations of Pujol and Main Streets are not expected to change. The extension of First Street will affect the owner of vacant commercial property (the City Maintenance Yard) at the southwest corner of Front and First Streets and the owner of a 12-unit apartment building at the intersection of Pujol and First Streets. MAS191 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Question: What are the timing and approval processes development permits under the Master Conditional Use Permit? for the subsequent R:%STAFFRPT%OTRP.PC2 512e/95 Idb 4 MEMORANDUM roOM: DATE: luns 1, 199~ The ~ for comida'sfien in the -iignn,~, of Western Bypass Corridor srem follows: · · · · · · M~imi-e tla ,'Bmn"e latwen 1-15 rsnqx and Front Street. Texaco gas ~ Minlmi~e ~t dope. The desired earthwork export q. antit'y m adjaz.t ptopmi.. Please note tha~ the last item on the list is crucisl since we sre mw readY lD sdvsace imo ~nsl ~ ~ Phase I of the Western Bypass Corridor. The Wemide Specific Plan Zrsding would determine the required elevation st the intersection of the Western Bypsss Corridor mt Vincent MoraSa Drive sad ultimately the intersection configuration of the Western Bypsss Corridor st Rand~ California Rosd. To da~, thr~ Western Bypass Corridor sli.- ..... ~,~, finn ~ 1-15/SR79s to V'mcent MorSia Drive (extended from its existinS terminus to imersea Western Bypass Corridor), bare been ssmlyz~. Altem~ve 1 This alignment would cres~ a 'balax.zd' proj~t since th~ raw esthwork qesn,ti,- sssocised with ~s alignment are as follows: , Cut 206,552 C.Y. Pill 188,822 C.Y. Therefore th~ gmsmsi amom of mamid as a nmdt of Srading activit7 sssociami with this is 17,730 C.Y. Alternative 2 r.~ ~ usssessa Cut 675,940.21 Fill 107,812.65 Thetlzetheg~amomofm,feri-~ saremaltofgradingactivi~Y~wltthis'"imm'm is 568,127.56 C.Y. which i~ quite ramsiva. This ~i_m~m~nt has lhe same horizon~ ,si~nmamt as the NBS/l~wry's but the vertical ~si.mmm~mf hls-lMtm The taw eadhwotk qp*m~es ~ with this ,~m m~ as .f~nows: Cut 368,009o55 ... Fill 147,348.18 Therefore the genented amount of material as aresuit of grading gtivity assts:ined with this nwlgnmene is 220,661.37 C.Y. ~ ..................... ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ . . ~ .... : ..................... ! .~ ! ~,~ ....... ~ ...................... i'i'ii~! ...... c ..................... ~ .... ~ ~,~ ~ ...... ~ .............. i ~ ............. ... ................ !~i ................. : ..............i i i · .~ .............. : ..........~, · · · ~ i i · · i .............., ............ i .~i .... : .~ ............. : ..........!'ii ....i.i ............. : I ~ ....... · ~, ............................. ATTACHMENT NO. 13 CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN FOR WESTSIDE SPECIFIC PLAN (PLEASE SEE ATTACHED PACKET FROM HANCOCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY) 5 HANCOCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY INCORPORATED June 2, 1995 Members of the Planning Commission City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 Mr. Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission: Enclosed are the following: 1. A revised preliminary grading plan for the Westside Specific Plan prepared by David Evans & Associate, a civil engineering firm. David Evans & Associates has offices across the Western United States. The work was performed under the direction of Thomas J. Crowicy, P.E. a Registered Civil Engineer based in the ~rm's Riverside, CA office. David Evans & Associates revised preliminary grading plan is designed to balance the amoum of cut and fill, therefore not requiring the import or export of dirt, for Planning Areas A, B, C, D and E. The plan has been designed to be the most viable alternative because it will be cost effective and have the least mount of impact on the escarpment. This plan assumes a grading balance independem of the grading generated for the Western By-Pass. Corridor. This revised plan will update the eadier preliminary grading plan (prepared by Hunsaker & Associates Riverside/San Bemardino, Inc. which is included in the Westside Specific Plan as Figure 16). A letter from David Evans & Associates describing the amount of cut and fill On cubic yards) and that the revised preliminary grading plan will balance and not require the import or export of dirt to or from the Westside Specffic Plan area. The 'Balanced Alternate" Alignment for the Western By-Pass Corddor was recently prepared under contract to the City by Trans Pacific Consultants (TPC)... The TPC "Balanced Alternate" Alignment balances the amount of cut and fill at approximately ' 200,000 cubic yards required to construct the Westem By-Pass Corddor (See the attached plans entitled 'Westem By-Pass Corddor Preliminary Alignment - Sheets 1 and 2). we appreciate your consideration of this matter and look forward to reviewing this additional information with you. Presil ent June 2, 1995 ~- Mr. Eugene S. Hancock, President Hancock Development Company, Inc.. 3183 Ainvay Avenue, Building E Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Subjee~: WESTSIDE SPECIFIC PLAN TE~ C~LwORNIA David Evans and Associates, Inc. (DE, A) has completed a preliminary mass gracllnE plan for your project in Terneel,In. California. In the analysis and preparation of the mass grndlnE plan, DE, A stat~ the following: · This 200' scale mass ~ plan was prepared under the supervision of Thomas J. Crowicy, C~Hfomia Registered Civil Rngineer No. 43868, Exp.? June 30, 199Z This grueling plan was produced u~16~n.v a five foot contour interval bluellne of a topographic survey peffotxaed by others, date unknown. Quantifies are based on an averaged grid over the entire site and does not represent a precise plan or quantifies of dirt. 'The qtmnfities of the Western By-Pass Corridor were not included in the calculations of dirt quantities. Prelimlnnry earthwork calculations for planning Areas A, B, C, D, and E, have found the following:. / / The f~nish contours shown would produce a cut q, _~nfity of 1,161,287 cubic yards. The finish contours shown would produce a fill quantity of 1,454,454 cubic yards. The concept of this plan is for mass grading purposes only. With additional allalysis of the gr~_ding plnn; Some adjustment of finigh grades, and consideration of shrinkage and subsidence based on recommendation of a soils engineer, it is the opinion of thig engineer that the site could be balanced. · Future development will require additional grading designs for building pads, roadways, parking areas, and other planned uses. Earthwork quantities based DAVID E~NS AND ASSOCL~TF,5. INC. '~ PROFESSIONAL ';E~XlC~ C,.',7-~L'LTi.x:~, OFFICES IN OREGON. XX:LfHINGTON. C-U.IFOILN L:, .-~.'lD ARIZONA l'00 IOWA AVENUE. SUITE 230 RIVERSIDL CM.IFORNLA. 92i0' :909) 0i6-66,H F.-~X 1909~ 686-2916 June 2, 1995 Mr. Eugene S. Hancock, Presidem Hancock Development Company, Inc. Page Two on derailed bm'ldlnE and construction pl~n_~; vail vary from what has been Sencrated herein. DEA has kept you informed throughout thix project, therefore, you how that this task was not easy due to the time constraints placed on DE,,I and the delivery of the grading plan and calculations. DEA would like to emphasize that the plan and quanli~c~ are preliminary and if more precise w,mhen are needed, more precise (calculations will need to be performed. Please do not hesitate m contact me should you require additional information. Sincerely, DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Cliff Siment~l, PLS. CAS.'pc DA~,qD E~,NS AND ASSOCIATES. INC. :. PROFESSION.~ -~ERVICES CONSULTING FiR.M ATTACHMENT NO. 9 DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES MAY 15, 1995 R:~.FORMS\STAFFRPT.CC 6/7/95 Idb 82 tq,ANN~c- COMI~K'qON MEETtNC- DRAFT MAY l_a;. 3. Plennino Anolicetion No. 95-O0~1 (Hot Ben) Assistant Banner Matthew Fagen presented the staff report. Staff recommends the Commission adopt the negative declaration for this project. The Public Hearing was opened at 6:10 P.M. Russell Ruminoff, 27349 Jefferson Ave, Temecula, spoke as representative for the applicant and expressed his agreement with the Conditions of Approval including a modification on #45 - language to include orior to the b, ,ildina oermit not grading permit. Mark Telford, 28481 Rancho California Road, Temecula, spoke with concern for needed landscaping along the wall facing the street. , Russell Ruminoff responded to the landscaping concern. Trees of varying types in 15 gallon containers will be planted along the wall. The applicant will work with the Commission to develop a complementary plan. The Public Hearing was closed at 6:20 P.M. Commissioner Webster expressed concern on the set beck for landscaping and due to the height of the building it would be difficult for plants to grow. Staff responded a landscaping design could be agreed on as per Commission direction. It was moved by Commissioner Fahey and seconded by Commissioner Blair to approve Planning Application No. 95-0021 including the modification on Conditions of Approval #45 and the addition of landscape and trees. Chairman Ford called for a recess at 6:25 P.M. The meeting of the Temecula Banning 'Commission was reconvened at 6:30 P.M. Chairman Ford presiding. e Banning Aoolication No. 95-0031 - Environmental ImDaot Reoort Banninn ADDliCatiOn NO. 94-0061 - Master Conditional Use Permit Bannine Aoolication No. 95-0003-Westside Soecific Ban. Rannine AoDlication No. 95-0004- Tentative Tract Mao No. ~8011 Banning Director Thornhill presented the format for the meeting: Phase I - Staff will report Phase 2 - Commission will ask questions Phase 3 - Public will comment Phase 4 - Applicant will present his response/rebuttal Phase 5 - Commission will comment R:Minutes\05 1595.1~ 2 DRAFT PI,ANNINC- I~-flMMI~gION lV!EI.:'re NC- MAT 1-~. 1995 Assistant Planer Matthew Fagen presented the background on the adopted ordinance for the Master Conditional Use Permit. Also presented was the Westside Specific Ran which includes Area A) commercial; Area B) commercial; Area C) 13-20 acres high density residential; Area D) 13-20 acres high density residential; Area E) mixed use; Area F) 67.4 acres of open space. Assistant Planner Fagen presented three letters for the record concerning the Western Specific Plan. Thomas E. Nelson wrote he was concerned about the area being impanted during construction. He is opposed to the project. Albert S. Pratt wrote to oppose the Westaide Specific Plan. Kay Cassaro wrote to oppose the Westside Specific Plan. Conred Joiner Jr. wrote to oppose the Westside Specific Plan. Associate Planner David Hogan presented 8 summary of the EIR and the components of the Westside Specific Plan which are consistent with the City's General Plan. Staff recommends approval. The Public Hearing was opened at 7:05 P.M. Zev Buffman, applicant, addressed the Commission to introduce Mike Parmary, architect for the project, and Bob Kirkpatrick, Senior Advisor. Mike Paneary presented a description of the Buffman project related to the specific plan. Mr. Paneary detailed the Master Conditional Use Permit citing the specific uses. Bob Kirkpatrick, President of Rancon Temecula, spoke on the benefits to the community related to the Buffman project. Mr. Kirkpatrick presented information on the entertainment district being consistent with the specific plan. He also stated that the hours of operation would be staggered which are sensitive to neighbor concerns. Gene Hancock, representative for Hancock Development, Costa Mesa, spoke as the author of the specific plan and requested to respond to public questions. Steve Riverside, representative for the Westside Specific Plan, highlighted the proposed parking areas, and the permitted uses for the project. The Public Hearing was opened at 7:40 P.M. Kay Cassaro 31616 Paseo Goleta, Temecula spoke in opposition to the Buffman Project and the Westside Specific Plan. R:Minutes\051595.pc 3 DRAFT 1995 PLANNING I~.rl]~I~I~INN ]V!I;T!1NC Ben Fraleigh, 39850 Rica Drive, Temecula spoke in support to the Buffman project and the Westside Specific Plan. George Buhler, 40265 Paseo Sereno, spoke in support to the Buffman project. Spoke in opposition to the Westside Specific Plan. I~ilip Hoxsey, 43318 Cielo de Azul, spoke in opposition to the Buffman project and the Westside Specific Plan. Robert Lord, 30120 Pachenga Drive, Temecula spoke in support to the Buffman project. Leonard Bustin, 41935 Guile Cabrillo, spoke in support to the Buffman project. .. Ron Walton, 30075 Ynez Rd, Temecula, spoke in support to the Buffman project. Doug Davies, 27450 Ynez, Temecula, spoke in support to the Buffman project. Mavin Zelden, 28659 Front St, Temecula, spoke in support to the Buffman project. *; Robert Bums, 30112 Santiago Road, spoke in support to the Buffman project. Scott Gray, 31794Vie Saltio, spoke in support to the Buffman project. Joan Sparkman, 30554 San Pasqual Road, Temecula, spoke in support to the Buffman project. Teri Gilmore, 27450Ynez Road, Temecula, representing the Temecula Chamber of Commerce, spoke in support to the Buffman project. Pstricia Keller, 39201 Salines Drive, Murriets, spoke in opposition to the Buffman project. Bob Allred, 41941 Morono Drive, Temecule, spoke in support to the Buffman project. flussell D'Hondt, 31707 Vie Soltic, Temecule, spoke in opposition to the Buffman project and the Westside Specific Plan. Phile McDeniel, Main/B Street, spoke in opposition to the Buffman project. Chairman Ford csfied for · recess at 8:20 P.M. The meeting of the Temecula Planning Commission was reconvened at 8:30 P.M., Chairman Ford presiding. R:Minutes\051595.pc 4 DRAFT lq ANNINf'- COI~MIR~qION 1V, K~:I:~Nf'- Applicant's response to public questions: - the building height will comply with the specific plan. - the opera building is planned for 85,000 gross square feet. - detailed mitigation exists for noise abatement and will meet performance criteria. - Buffman project and the Westside Specific Plan is consistent to the Old Town Specific Plan. The Public Hearing was closed at 8:55 P,M, COMMISSION DISCUSSION Commissioner Webster expressed. his concern on the Buffman Project: - he recommends the Commission review any major structures in the Master Conditional Use Permit prior to approval. he would like to see the plaza separate and centrally located in the Old Town area. Commissioner Blair requested the following: -historic buildings need to be preserved. - a matrix of the phasing schedule is needed. - a conceptual sketch of the buildings. Commissioner Fahey requested the following: -a matrix of scheduled road improvements. - mitigation study addressed concerning parking and bus traffic. - business interruption during construction addressed, Commissioner Slaven expressed the following concerns: - underground utilities to be integrated. Commissioner Ford requested a matrix of the traffic plan. The Commission expressed concerns regarding the Westside Specific Plan: Commissioner Blair: information needed on proponents of grading in Area D. ]V!'.&_Y 1;. 1F)5 R:Minutes\05 1595 .pc 5 ~,ANN~C- COMMIK~ION ~G DRAFT MAY l-q. 199~ Commissioner Slaven: - concerned about the Western By-Pass Corridor being extended to Muftieta. - would like input on the cdor and fabric used for the canvas top on the arena. - the height of the arena. - a list is needed of epproved business uses. - more information is needed on the maintenance of the animals. Commissioner Fahey: not in favor of a service station or bowling alley as presented in plan. difficulty approving Area D due to grading issues. , area wildlife is a concern. difficulty understanding consistency with the general plan. need more detail on Area A. need more understanding on road improvement phases. Commissioner Webster: requests size of the park facility in the residential area. requests a provision to centrally locate the on-sits/off-site day- care facility. requests language in the specific plan to include colors for the tent structure. concerned about flags on the roof' of the tent structure. requests a list of epproved uses for Area A and Area B. Commissioner Ford cited the following concerns to staff: widening of certain roads - mitigation monitoring is needed. who is responsible for funding the purchase of equipment. requests definition of road way language. requests schedules for road improvement, planning, construction, and build out. concerned about the high density on Area D. should signals be installed on Vincent Moraga. concerned about the .height of the arena. requests the entrance sign monument location be moved to the Western By-Pass and Front Street. requests pedestrian access be included. request trees small and uniform included for landscaping. Commissioner Fahey expressed concerned that the open space fire/vegetation management is not addressed. R:Minutes\05 15~5 .pc 6 lq,ANNING COM1VR~RION DRAFT Commissioner Siaven expressed concern for the following: monitoring of the shuttles regarding pollution. who will manage the odor/animal waste. how the wetland area will be restored. MAY 1-4;. 1995 It was moved by Commissioner Slavart and seconded by Commissioner Blair to continue the PA No, 95-O031 - Environmental Impact Report - PA No. 94-0061 - Master Conditional Use Permit and PA No. 95-0003- Westside Specific Plan to June 5, 1995, 6:00 P.M. which will postpone the Review of The City Development Code. The motion carried as follows: AYES: 5 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Ford, Sisvan, Fahey, Webster NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None PLANNING DIRECTOR'S RI:PORT None PLANNING COMMISSION DISCUSSION None It was moved by Commissioner Fshey and seconded by Commissioner Slaven to adjourn the meeting at 1 O: 15 P.M. R:Minutes\051595.pc 7 ATTACHMENT NO. 10 DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JUNE 5, 1995 MINUTES WILL BE PROVIDED AS SOON AS THEY ARE AVAILABLE R:%FORMS~STAFFRFr. CC shies k~b 83 ATTACHMENT NO. 11 CHAPTER 9 OF THE FINAL EIR - RESPONSE TO COMMENTS MAY 15, 1995 R:%FORMS%STAFFRPT.CC 6/7/95 Idb 84 Old Toum Plan RF.~PONSF-,~ TO COMMF. NT,~ CHAFFER 9 RESPONSE TO COMMENTS ON THE DRAFf ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE CITY 0FTEMECULA '~ OLD TOWN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT SCH#94072039 Prepared fo~.. City of Temeeula 43174 Business Park Drive Temeeula, California 92590-3606 Prepared by: Tom Dodson & Associates 463 North Sierra Way San Bernardino, CA 92410 March 1995 Old Te~n Re~k,,v~t ~ Rnal Foc~se6 RB~ RE,q'ON,~E,~ TO COMMF, NT,~ CHAPTER 9 RESPONSES TO COMMENTS INTROnI1~rI'ION The City of Temecula received written comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Report (FIR) for the Old Town Redevelopment Project (SCH #940T2039) from six govemmenl agencies. The following al]encies submitted written comments which are addressed in the Responses xo Comments which is provided as Chapter 9 to the Final EIR. The eight chapters included in the Draft EIR are not reproduced herein and t_bis chapter, Chapter 9, should be placed with the Draft EIR to constitute the Final EIR. Responses to comments beEin on the following page. Agencies submitting comments inchde: 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. State Clearinghouse Departmere of the Army, Los Angeles District, Corps of EnEineers Department of Transportation, Caltr~n~ District 8 County of Riverside Transportation and Land Management A~ency City of Murricta Southern C~llfomia Association of Governments LETTER tl STATE OF CALIFORNIA GOVEFINOF!'S OFFICE OF PLANNING AND FIESEARCH ~ 400 TENTH STREET ~,CRAMENTO, CA 95814 PETE WILSON. January 23, 1995 DAVID W. HOGAN CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING DEPARTMENT 43174 BUSINESS PARK DR. TEMECULA, 'C.~ '92590 Subject: OLD TOWN REDEVELOPMENT pROJECT SCH #: 94072039 Dear DAVID W. HOGAN.:.'.. ~he State Clearinghouse submitted the above named environmental document to selected state agencies for review. The review period is closed and none of the state agencies have-comments. This letter acknowledges that you have complied with the State 1-1 Clearinghouse review requirements for draft environmental "- documents, pursuant to the California Environmental Quali~yAct- Please call KristenDerscheid at (916) 445-0613 if you have any questions regarding the environmental review process. When "' contacting the Clearinghouse in this matter, please use the eight- digit State Clearinghouse number so that we may respond promptly- Sj' Chief, State Clearing~ouse Planning Department S~/~ if qHO :~ Pmje~ Tide: OLD TO%VN REDEYELOPh!EKT r~OJECT Aleracy: CMYoirTesemet: Address: 4'3174 &abe. h#k Drive Teamoda, CA Zip: 9"~0 Au,nor's Pared Sacdam__ Towndrip: __S. Notice of Completion T.k:Pmi~MamF, $uaHw'yl: bamma~lSmmlSmmRmn=~ Aiqmm: m Ted Ace:. r/0 ('eddies ,.ads CEQA Denmse~ Type [ ),'cop [ ]N,~iv~ D,d~_._'-.-~- [ ]S~VL, -~ IEP, [ ]E!~ (Prim. SCH/) [ I~Y cv"'b"~ ~~ [ ~:~: ~' r ~ ' [ ~ ~ A~ T~ [ ~~u~ ~i~ [ ~ { 1~~ ~.~~ [ ~}~CE ~mnf Aimmats ~ M,eer ~it~l U. ~;t ~d~mt ~~: U~u4~ ~ 3t [ )O~: ~-~ ~1~: ~.h. ~ 63 [ }lad~: ~-~ ~ ... [ Ibm: [ ]~: hj~ ~ b in ~t [ I/remark8 T [Xl~~,~ Pr~t Land Use: VKam. comm~mia~. a~d msldm~aL Current Z4n~nl: S~ ~. Mm~m~l'~ffiH ~, G~ ~. ~ M. ~ R~- Ainutram ~ ~ ~m). G~ ~ ~: ~ ~. ~way-T~ ~, ~ ~. M~ ~ Hi~ ~i~ RM~. ~ S~. ~ ~ ~- ~j~ ~p6M: ~ P~ Old T.n ~,e~ ~ b~ ~i~vm e ~l of 10 ~~ CLEARINGHOUSE coIrtAc"t: Mark GOBi (916) 445-0613 =rr ~v 'm ~z.a, I - 17 AGZ,,CT MY TO scss, I _ ;~0 AC.".Q/APCD: ~ '; IRGeOMrCem: ~ T--/~r... ) RecLaeatton BCDC he Tranep alone __ __keronauCLcs __ CHP __--,,._...n., ~ __ __Tress PLanfiLM __~HOMILnq & DevIL __ __.DrLnkLq E2O KedLcat waste GiMrI1 lervLena __~ Waste ~t M ~ t ~rantm ~e--~Xta ~f--wtr ~alLty S~Cls--wtr Rights ~__~. ~1 t TthlMlt ~ trect Lone l~ M-~t a __SnerW Ci __Santa Hn Htne l_State ~Me C~ __Ta~ Rgl Plan ~r: Old Tow~ i~;=~t ~ Rn.! Pocu~d ~R RESPONSES TO COMMENT Lk;rl~K #1 STATE ~GHOUSE 1-1 This letter verities that the City of Temecula has complied with the Ca]flora Environmental Quality Act review requirements for the Draft EIR which addresses the Old Town Development ProjecL This informa~on will be made available w the City Council when it considers the proposed project for"decision- Office of the Chief Regulatory Branch LETTER #2 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY LOS ANGELES DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS 300 NORTH LOS ANGELES STREET LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90012 December 20, lg94 I?ECEIV D DEC 3 hs'd. ......... 2-1 2-2 City of Temecula Planning Department Arm: David Hogan 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, California 92590 Dear Mr. Hogan: This letter is in regard to the Draft Envirorunental Impact Report (DEIR), dated December 1994, for the Old Town Redevelopment Project in the City of Temecula, Riverside County, California. .... According to the DEIR, the proposed project would include the construction or replacement of four bridges crossing Mui'rieta Creek, impacting approximately 1.4 acres of weftand habitat. Construction of these bridges would result in a discharge of fill into waters of the U.S. and would require a Section 404 permit from the Army Corps of Engineers. As you are aware, Riverside County Flood Control District (District) is currently proposing to construct flood control facilities within Murrieta Creek. Because the bridge crossings associated with your proposed project are sufficien~y related to the District's proposed flood control project, we will need to evaluate the impacts associated with the bridge crossings in light of the District's overall plan for Murrieta Creek. Specifically, the DEIR states that the bridges would be 150 feet long; however, the most recen~y proposed design for Murrieta Creek through Old Town Temecula includes a channel width between 220 and 245 feet. The Corps would not authorize construction of bridges in Old Town which would preclude design alternatives for the Murrieta Creek project. Therefore, constru. ction of the proposed bridges would not be authorized until a final design for Murrieta Creek has been approved by the Corps. There are three options by which you could obtain Section 404 authorization to construct the proposed bridges across Murrieta Creek. First, you could request that the District include the proposed bridges as part of their permit application for the Murrieta Creek flood control project. Second, you could wait for the Corps to approve a design for Murrieta Creek and then apply for a separate permit to construct the bridges. Third, you could apply for a permit to construct the bridges before Corps approval of the District's Murrieta Creek project if the bridges were designed to span the widest alternative currently being considered for Murrieta Creek through Old Town Temecula. Final Focus~ sa:rR RF,~PONgR.~ TO COMM~.NT~ RESPONSES TO COMMENT Lsa-X'~;K #2 LOS ANGRLI~'-S DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS 2-1 The Draft EIR specifically identifies the Corps as one of the permitting agencies that the City of Temecula will have to consult prior to implementing the proposed project Your comment indicates a _m_ i-~ndcrstanding of the' 150 foot distance discussed in the Draft EIR. The 150 foot distance represents an estimate of the current width of the existing Murriem Creek channel at each of the proposed' crossing locations. It was used to estimate the specific area that would be subject to Corps jurisdiction when it comes time to obtain the Section 404 permits from the Corps. H the Old Town Rcdevelopmcnt Project is approved by the City, any bridges included in the approval would have to be engineered in accordance with the Riverside County Flood Control District and Corps design requirements. If the bridges must be 220 to 245 feet in width w meet the ultimate channel design for Murrieta Creek, then the City will meet thi.~ design requirement However, for the purposes of calculating the area currently within the cb,',nnel and subject to the Section 404 permit process, the es!imated 150 foot width was the appropriate value in the EIR. 2-2 If the Old Town Rcdevelopment Projea. is approved, the City will evaluate the three alternatives for obt~inlng Section 404 authorization identified in your comment in the context of the required timing tO meet the proposed project's schedule. If the bridges will be construaed before the Corps approves the Flood Control District's Murrieta Creek project, the City will design the bridges for w span the widest alternative currently being considered as suggested in your comment If you choose to pursue the second or third option, the following considerations should be taken into account with regard to the nationwide permit program (see enclosure): 2-3 Nationwide Permit 26 permits discharges of dredged or fill material into headwaters and isolated waten. Because the locations of the proposed bridges are below the headwaters of Murrieta Creek, which is not an isolated waters, Nationwide Permit 26 would not apply to your proposed project. Nationwide Permit 24, which permits fills for roads crossing waters of the United 5tares, limits the filled area to no more than a third of an acre and no more than 200 linear feet of fill for the roadway placed in any special aquatic sites, including weeands. A 220 to 245 foot long, 100 foot wide bridge would impact between 0.50 and 0.56 acres of waters; therefore,' Nationwide Permit 14 would .not apply to your proposed project. Nationwide Permit ?.5, which permits structural discharges, and Nationwide Permit 33, which permits temporary construction access and dewatering, may apply to your proposed project provided the project meets all the general terms and conditions of the nationwide permit program at 33 CFR Part 330, Appendix A(C). H all bridge abutments and related bank protection are placed outside of waters of the US., the "" bridge may comply with the conditions of the nationwide permit program, provided it can be designed in a manner which will not result in greater than minimal individual or cumulative adverse environmental effects. 2-4 If your project cannot comply the terms and conditions of any of the nationwide permits, an individual permit would be required. If an individual permit is required, you will need to submit an alternatives analysis satisfying the Section 404C0)(1) Guidelines and a review of all public interest factors relevant to the proposal, including the cumulative effects thereof. The following information would be required as part of either an individual or nationwide permit application: de A conceptual mitigation plan for impacts to all aquatic resources affected by all phases of the project. A final mitigation plan can be prepared concurrent with permit application processing and review. Verification that you have contacted the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) regarding the resolution of all outstanding cultural resources issues. Verification that you have contacted the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFW5) regarding the presence of all federally listed species on the proposed project site. Focused species surveys for all proposed, threatened or endangered species which may be impacted by the proposed project. Please be advised that these surveys are generally only valid for a period of one year. Old 'foeu ~t Plan Final Focu$~ ~ REgPONgEg 'r~ coMM~,NT~ 2-3 Your comments are noted and will be made avaihble to the City Council when it considers the proposed project for decision. A de_ci~ion regarding the spedtic type of permit- (nationwide -or individual)-caunot-~e .made-4mxil -the .bridge designs are completed by the City. The bridge designs will only be undertaken ff the Old Town Redevelopmerit Project is approved by the City. Please refer to response to cornmere 2-3. Your comments are noted and will be made available to the City Council when it considers the Old Town Redevelopment' Project for deci_'~on. We encourage you to arrange a pre-application meeting with us at an appropriate lime so that we can further discuss permitting of your proposed project. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the DEIIL If you have any questions, please contact Eric Stein of my staff at (213) 894-0352. Please refer to this letter and Project No. 95-00093-ES in future correspondence- Sincerely, John A. Gill Chief, Regulator,/Branch Enclosure US'EPA; Attn: Jams Romeso USFW5; Atin: John Konecny C'DFG; Arm: Dee $udduth Tom Dodson and Associates; Arm: Tom Dodson Old Ton Fm$1Fot-nsedl~JR R~,,~PoN.~F,,~ TO C-OMM~,~ 2-5 ff the project is approved, the City intends to hold a pre-application meeting ,with the Corps and the Rood Control District to discuss alternative bridge engineering designs and processing requirements and schedules, ............ LETTER P.Z/3 $TATm ~ ~',* ~.1 t 'I~A~-~tAl'lOm4 AND NOUSl4C AOe,,ICY ~EPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION aa. nuar3[ 25, 2.995 08-Riv-15-4 - g .... -,.SCltf --,9402203 9 Mr. David Hogan, Project Manager City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590~;'- ': Dear Mr. Hogan: Old Torn Redeve~oDment Pro~ect Dr~ft ~vtronmental ZmDact Report We have reviewed the above-referenced document and request consideration of the following comments: 3-1 · This document should include project trip-ends __ generated par day. m The project -Transportation/Circulation" section does 3-2 not adequately disclose the cumulative nor project's direct traffic impacts to mainline Interstate 15 (I-15). The traffic study portion of this report should be amended to include the following from a worst case scenario: existing and build-out projected average daily traffic (ADT) volumes. 3-3 3-4. As stated in the Draft Route Concept Report for 1-15 (January, 1992) the ultimate corridor plan in the project area is a tan (10) lane freeway including two (2) High Occupancy Vehicle (HOW) lanes within a 300 foot right-of-way. The City should utilize Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fees (TU~F) or other development fee programs as a method for each development to fund improvements to mitigate the deterioration of the level of service (LOS) for which it is responsible. The improvements to state facilities identified tO mitigate the project impact should be completed prior to the relevant phase of development vhich generates the additional traffic. We urge a continuous liaison with Caltrans on all proposed plans as they affect state highways. OM T~,n Rt.~..tli,_ :nt ~ RF,~gPONgl~,,~ TO C-OMMENT,~ RESPONSES TO COMMENT t-~:rl'm;R #3 DEPARTIVIENT OF TRANSPORTATION CALTRAN8 DISTRICT 8 3-1 The technical Analyses conducted by Banon-Aschman Associates, Inc., as specified .... by. the City. of Temecula. Department of.l~hh'c-.Wo~ks-considered ~nly the weekday evening peak hour occurring between 4:00 PM and 6:00 PM and the Saturday midday peak hour ocaxtring between 12:00 noon and 2:00 PM. No analysis of the 24-hour dam was required for the projea-specific evaluation after conferring with Caltrans, County, and City representatives in an agency *scoping' meeting held prior to preparing the ~raffic studies. This meeting was held Aldril 26, 1994 at the City of Temecula City Hall h was concluded that the 24-hour traffic dam would not be needed to make a worst-case trsfBc impaa evaluation which is provided by the focus on the peak hour impacts of the project. 3-2 Banon-Aschmnn's summary report 'Congestion Management Program Traffic Analys~ of the Proposed Old Town Redevelopmere Project,* October 28, 1994, contains analyses of existing (1994), 1996 (Phase I Project), and 2010 (full Projea Development) conditions along 1-15..This doo~ment was provided to the public in the Draft EIR Technical Appendices. For 1996 and 2010, analyses both without and with the Project traffic are included. However, the analyses are based upon weekday evening peak-hour dataas specified by Caltrans, the Riverside County Transportation Commi-~sion, and the City Of Temecula in a technical *scoping" meeting beld April 26, 1994, at the City of Temect~a City Hall. Thi~ scenario was selected as a worst- case analysis of potential traffic impact and is, therefore, indicative that the 24-hour impacts will not be significantly adverse. 3-3 Your comment is noted and will be made available xo the City Council when it considers the Old Town Redevelopment Projea for decision. The City will require funding of infrastructure improvements associated with the Old Town Redevelopment Project to be funded concurren~y with development of the'project or prior to occurrence of a significant impact on a particular infrastructure system. As noted in response to comment 3-3, the City will require circulation system improvements associated with the Old Town Redevelopment Project to be completed concurrently with the development or when required to mitigate potential traffic impacts below a significant level as outlined in the Draft EIR. 3-5 The City has consulted Caltrans since the inception of the Old Town Redevelopment Projea applications. If the Old Town Redevelopmerit Project is approved, the City will continue to consult and work closely with Caltrans to implement improvements that may affea state highways. Hr. David Hogan, Project Manager January 25, 1995 Page 2 If you have any questions, plsass contact Cecil Xarstsnsen at (909) 383-4233 or FAX (909) 383-7934. Si~carely, Transportation Planning LETTER #4 COUNTY-OF RIYERSIDE TRANSPORTATION AND CY IAND MANAGEMENT A GEN Transportation Deparm~ent TRANSPORTIEION P~ AND SYST RECEIVED January 23, 1995 Mr. Gar~ Thornhill, Planning Director City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 JAN 2 6 1995 ....... .. Re: Old Town Redevel~pment Dear Mr. Thornhill: The Riverside County Transportation Department has reviewed the above referenced project and offers the following comments: ;- 1. The Department did not receive the Technical Appendices that were referenced in Volume I, and therefore staff could not 4-1 perform a detailed review. However, based on the information provided, the Department does not anticipate any unacceptable degradation in Level of Service (LOS) on County maintained _ roads due to the project. 2. Section 4.6.4.6 and 4.6.4.7= Assessment District 159 plans for the State Route 79 South/Interstate 15 Interchange are complete and are expected to be signed by Caltrans within 60 to 90 days. The County of Riverside anticipated bid 4-2 advertisement in the. summer of 1996. Inclusion of any modifications to the improvement plans for either the interchange or State Route 79 South would have to be proposed in the immediate future for the County to consider. An agreement between the County of Riverside and the project developer requiring the developer to cover all redesign and increased construction costs associated with the interchange __ modifications would be necessary. 3. The document proposes massive infrastructure improvements for the City, but does not identify the responsible party(s) for 4-3 construction. Page 3-12 and 13 indicates the City has identified a range of improvements that would enhance circulation in the project vicinity and that they are expected to be in place by Phase I of (1996) the project. Does this mean that the City has programmed these improvements. It is not clear whether the applicant will be providing any of the improvements. 4080 Lemon Street, 81h Floor - Riverside. Calil'ornia 92:501 · (909) 275-6740 P.O. Box 1090 -Riversidc, CaliEornia 92502-1090' F.-%.X (909) 275-6721 OM Toss FmalF~mss~ RE~PON~Eg T~ COMM'i~,NT~ RESPONSES TO COMMENT LETTER #4 COUNTY OF RIVERS~E TRANSPORTATION AND IAND MANAGEMENT AGENCY 4-1 ....Your comment is. noted,and.,wilLbe.made_availableAothe-City.-Council when it considers the Old Town Redevelopment Project for decision. The City has provided the County with a copy of the Technical Appendices in response to this comment. 4-2 Your comment is noted and will be made available to the City Council when-it considers the Old Town Redevelopment Projea for d~cision. If the project is approved, the City will confer with both the County and Caltr~n~ to incorporate design changes that will be necessary to accommodate the Old Town Redevelopment Project. Arrangements can be made at that time regarding funding for any redesign costs and any consequent increases in construction costs attributable to the Project. 4-3 The City will not make any formal commitments W the infTastructure improvements required to implement the Old Town Redevelopment Project until a decision is made on the application. ff the project is approved, the City and the Zev Bnffrn~n Group would assume responsibility for ensuring these infrastructure improvements, including circulation system improvements outlined in the Draft EIR, are in place prior to the occurrence of any significant project impacts. Old Town RedeveloPment January 23, 1995 Page 2 4-4 4. The construction of the Western Bypass and two new bridges over Murrieta Creek will have significant environmental impacts- = 5. There are numerous grammatical errors, as well as illegible and upside down exhibits throughout the document. ~'~e Transpornation DeparUnent appreciates the oppornunity to r~view and comment on the project. We should request that upon completion 4-6 of the EIR process, the Department will receive complete copies of the Draft and Final EIR's with the "accompanying Technical Appendices. .. ~f you have any quesW~ons regarding this letter, please contact Ruthanne Taylor Berger, Senior Transportation planner, at (909) 275-2076- S inc ere ly, Edwin D. Studor Transportation planning Manager RTB:mw co: Laurie Dobson Bob Harvey, Caltrans District 8 La Keda Johnson, Caltrans District 8 Old Town P,e~s~t Plan Fnll!~k'lR Rg~PoN~g~ TO COMMgNT,~ Your comment is noted and wfll be msde available to the City Council when it considers the Old Town Redevelopment Projea for decision. The construction of these facilities wfll contribute w the short-term air quality and noise impacts that are .identified, as significant in the. Draft EIR. --- 4-5 Your comment is noted and will be made available w the City Council when it considers the Old Town Redevelopmcnt Project for decision. Copies of the Teehnlcal Appendices and the Final EIR wxll be provided to the Departmere as requested. 5-1 5-3 LETTER t5 26442 p, eelrm-n Caurt, Murriet.*, CA 92562 Telephone: 909-698-1040 F*-' 909-698-4509 January 24, 1995 Mr. Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Dr. Temecula, CA 92~90 Public Comments - Old Town Redevelopmerit Project, Zev Buffman Group .,* Dear Gary: - '- Attached are' the City of Murriem comments after review of the Old Town P, edevelopment Project Draft ~_Ip... Our comments, by Hank Mohle City .Traffic Engineer, relate to impact concerns that should include a larger traffic analysis area on the 1-15 and 1-215 corridor through Murrieta. We are also concerned about the "spillover" effect of project tnffic on our reach of Jefferson Ave. to the interchanges at 1-15 and 1-215. Lastly, a concern focuses on the trip distributio~ assignment at SR79/Front St. Interchange vs. 1- 15/Rancho California Road all as addressed by Mr. Mohle. We appreciate the opportunity provided to us to critique the E.I.R. and stand ready to work with Temecula towards cooperative resolvement of mutual traffic concerns in our cities. Attachment: Mohle memo of ]an. 19, 1995 Sincerely, Director of Public Works/City Engineer CC: Stephen G. Harding Steve Mandoki Fred Buss Dan Clark Mayor & City Council · **~glLz- i~:.R'~BUFFMAN.TEM RESPONSES TO COMMENT I-~I'rER #S CITY OF MURRIETA S-2 The comments by the City's Traffic Pn~neer are addressed on the following pages. ..._ See.particularly.response .to comment 5~6. - - Based on the traffic impaa evaluation provided in the Draft EIR, all traffic flow into the entertainment facilities that would be constructed under the Old Town Redevelopmere Project can be managed without a significant impact aher improvements are installed, primarily at the SR-79yrI-15 inferchange with some traffic u~li~ng Rancho California Road. The data indicates that little or no Project traffic is forecast to affect the Winchester Road and I-1S interchange and the related surface streets, such as Jefferson Avenue/Front Street. Mitigation of impacts includes signage on Interstate 15 to direct entertainment facility traffic to the SR- 79/I-1S interchange, the Western Bypass and the majority of the parking facilities which will be located on the south side of the City of Temecula, well away from the areas of concern identified by the City of Murrieta. See also responses to comment 5-4 and 5-8. Please refer to response to cornmere 5-2 which also addresses this comment. Experience at other major entertainment venues is that traffic flow on a freeway, in th~s instance I-1S, can be directed to the preferred interchange, in this case the SR- 79/I-1S interchange, by use of passive and active signage and, if necessary, traffic officers to comrol the flow of traffic. See also responses to comment S-4 and 5-8. MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: 'DATE: SUBJECT: Ben ]vfmamidc, Director of Public Works I lank Mohle, Traffic Engineor {~ January ] 9, ! 995 Old Town Redevelopment Project l) rafi Environmental Impact Report, City ofTemccula; Zcv Buffman Group; Public Review Period December 7, 1994, to January 25, 1995 Sum,nary Comments The overall project has two phases. foliowhig to be located in the Old Town area of Tcmccula: · Cabaret Theaters---One at 27,000 square feet and a second at 45,000 square feet · Western Saloons--Two at 10,000 square feel * Open House--85,000 square feet · Wild West Arena--175,000 square feet · Virtual Reality Pavilions' One pavilion with two theaters with 50 seats each · "Quick Draw" Competition Area--i,000 square feet · Hotel ....350 i'ooms · Retail Commercial--30,000 square feet · Visitors Center/Ticket Office-=5,000 square feet · Administrative Space---20.000 square feet Phase 2 Phase 1, anticipated for operation in 1996, will consist of the of the project, to be built ara future undeterrnined time, will consist of the following: · Showboat--21,000 square feet · Virtual Real. ity Pavilions--Two pavilions · Hotel--Expansion ofPhase I hotel with 150 woms · Retail Commercial--20.000-70.000 square feet Old Town }redevelopmere Project Draft Environmental Impact P, epon. City oFTemecula; Zev Buffm~n Group: Public P. eview Period December 7. 1994. to January 25. 1995 January 19, 1995 Page 2 5=4 The 'bottom line' to Muftieta is that visitors traveling on 1-15 to/from the entertainment complex may fred the [-! 5 at P-ancho California bad interchange is excessively congested each time they attend a perfonnance and vAIl, therefore, change their muting to use Jefferson Avenue to Front Street or to Date Street to Din?, Road to P, ancho California P, oad to Zrmnt Street. This routing can' be. used-when there -is-s bridge- on..Date--Street--ovcr--Muffie, ta-Crcck.. -.-This-route would represent a "back way" to the complex. Therefore, Murtieln Jefferson Avenue traffic volumes may be impacted by the project. The exact impact cast be reliably quantified at this time. Continued cooperation between both cities to develop the 1'15/I-215 corridor system is my best recommendation. ' Detailed Comments The project is expected to generate 995 inbound and 325 outbound p.m. peak-hour net vehicle trips during a typical weekday. The project is also expected to generate 1,475 inbound and 330 mid-day peak-hour outbound net vehicle trips during a typical Saturday. The project traffic is expected to have the lollowing distribution of traffic: · 60% on l-l S nnnh of the project; · 20% on 1-15 south of the projcct; · 5% on P, ancho California Road, both east and west ofthe project; · 5°,/0 on Santiago Road east ofthe project; and , 5% on State Route 79 east ofthe project. The following signalized interseclions are projected to operate at the following levels of service, with mitigalion, in 1996. including the project's traffic: Weekday P.M. Saturday Mid-Day ],tarsection Peak-Hot-' LOS Peak-Hour LOS Rancl~o California P,d. ~'el Diaz R,d. B B gancho California Rzl. (6 Froart St. D D Ranchn California Rd. ~ 1-15 S/B C C l~tn'=ho California lt, d. 6J 1-15 N/B D D SR79 S/B/Front St. ~ 1-15 S/B D C SB.79 S/B t'~ I-I:S N/B B' C Froart St. (fi, l Western By-Pass C C OkI T~wn ~t ~ RE~gPONgF-~g TO C-OMM~,NTg As cited in Banon-Aschm~n's summary report 'Site Traffic Impact Analysis of the Proposed Old Town. Redevelopment Project-Phase 1," Oaober 28, 1994, Table 6, p. 40 (Draft EIR Technical Appendices) the primary intersections involving Rancho California Road which would serve the Project would operate at level of service D .__,or better in 1996 assuming~the implementation ~f P-roje, a-l~hase- 1 and .certnin.'other mitigation measures. These primary intersections include the I-15 North ramps, the 1-15 South ramps, Front Street and Diaz Road. The provision of LOS D operating conditions in the Rancho California Road corridor would not be expeaed to encourage Project patrons to exit 1-15 in advance of Rancho California Road in the City of Murrieta during the first phase of the Project in '1996. Further, as cited in Banon-Aschman's summary report "Congestion Management Program Traffic Impact Analysis of the Proposed Old Town Redevelopment Project," October 2.8, 1994, Table 4, p. 28 (Draft EIR Technical Appendices) 1-15 would operate at level of service B-D north of Rancho California Road in 1996 ~ss~mlng implementation of Project Phase 1. The provision of LOS D operating conditions on I- 15 north of Rancho California Road would not be expected to encourage Project patrons to exit 1-15 in advance of Rancho California Road in the City of Murrieta during the first phase of the Project in 1996. However, in 2010, LOS F is projected north of Rancho California Road assuming Project buffdour. Therefore, if alternative routes (to 1-15) exist which would provide noticeably faster travel times than 1-15, it is feasible that u'affic would be diverted from 1-15 to parallel surface streets. However, because LOS E-F is projeaed without the Project, such diversion by non- Project would be anticipated as well, thereby raising a question as to whether noticeably faster travel times on surface streets would, in fact, be feasible. Please refer to responses to comments 5-2 and 5-3. The City of Ternecula does not expect any impact in the area identified in this comment, but the use of trsf~c officers to control traffic flow so it does not affea this area can be implemented if it is found to be a problem in the future. The City of Temecula will be implementing traffic management plsn~ in cooperation with Calm and Riverside County to ensure traffic flow to entenainznent events is managed without si.cmi~cant impact to the freeway and local sudace streets. The City of Murrieta can be included in the development and implementation of these tra_ffic management plans to ensure that the areas identified in your comment do not become significantly impacted by implementation of the Old Town Redevelopment Project. Old Town P, edevelopment Project Draft fnvironmental Impact P, cport, City otrTemecula; Zev Buffman Group; Public P, eview Period Decernber 7, 1994, to January 25. 1995 January 19, 1995 Page 3 The follow'mS Congestion Management Program (CMP)-desiipmted freeway/highway segments are projected to opente at the following levels ofserviee in 1996, including the project's traffic: .... WeekdayJ**M. Segment Dir~ Peak-Hour LOS 1-15 N/O ltancho California P,d. (N/B) D 1-15 N/O Rancho C:alifomia ltd. (S/B/ D 1-15 betwrm Rmr, ho C. alifomia Kd. & S1~79 (N/B) "' B 1- !.5 between Ranclio' California Rd. & SK79 (S/B) C 1-15 S/O Sit?9 (N/B) C i- I .'i S/O SR79 (S/B) D SR79 E/O tw~-wny B The following signalized intersections arc projected to operate at the following levels of' service, with mitigation, at build-out, including the project's traffic: Weekday P.M. hatersection Pesk-I-lou,'LOS Rancho California Rd. (~ Vincent Momga Dr. C gancho California Rd. (~ Diaz Rd. D ltm~clm Califxarnin Rd. (~1 Front St. D Rm~clm California Rd. ~ !-15 N/B B Rancho California gd. ~ 1-15 S/B D/B Santiago gd. ~ Front St. D SK79 u~ I-15 N/B D SR79 ~ 1-1:5 S/B B Western Bypass 4~ Front St. C Wastera Bypass ,~.) Front SI2I-I~ S/B On-Ramp C (with n~w 1- 1~ S/FI loop off-ramp) The following CM'J'-dcsignatcd freeway/highway scgments ar~ projccte. cl to operate at the following levels of service in 2010, without and with the project's traffic. respectively: Old Town Kedevelopmcnt Project Draft ~nvironmental Impact P, eport, City of Temecula; :Zev Buffmsn Group; Public Review Period December ?, 1994, to January 25, 1995 January 19, 1995 Page 4 5-5 ,qeement Dir, I-1:~ N/O ledmcho California Rd. (N/B) ]-15 N/O P, mtcho California Rd. (S/j/ I-lJ betwe,__-,, P, atnci~ Califon~ia Rd. x, SK79 (N/B) I-1 ~ between P, ancho California Rd. & SR79 (S/B) I- ~ s SlO SP,?9 (N/j) I- ] .~i S/O Si1,?~ (S/11) SR7t) F,/O . .. two-way Weekday P.M. Peak-Hour LOS F/F F/F D/D n/ta 5=6 5-7 5=8 The Clvt. P-designntcd roadway segments tabulated above resulting in a level of' service or "F" with the project's traffic do not comply with the requirements of the P, ivcrside County Therefore, · ticfir, if.hey plan will be filed with I1.CTC, as recommended in the report. As a result of' the review of the report, the following concerns exist, on behalf of the City of ]vlurrieta: · The CMP traffic study should analyze at larger area, particularly the :[-35 and ]-215 freeway segments in the Murrieta sphere of influence. The City of Murtietat is potentially concerned about impacts of the project on the I-IS nnd ]-215 freeways through Murricta. · A potential camfern exists over the possible "spillover" e. Eects of traffic assodated with the project from 1-15 onto Jefferson Avenue in Murrieta. Due to the increasing congestion at l-15 interchange~ in the City of Temecula, many motorists currently utilize Murricta interchanges nnd Jefferson Avenue to bypass the 1-15 route to/from Tcmccula. · The project trip distribution (Volume it, Appendix ]II, page 3] of' the draft appears to favor the Sft79/Front Street Interchange over the P, ancho Californi~t Road Interchange for the 60% of the project tralT~c expected to utilize 1-15 to thc north of the project site. Although it is logical to asstime that a shift in project tra.Qic oriented along 1-] 5 to the north will occur from the P, ancho California }Load Interchange to the SP,79/Front Street Interchange due to the severe congestion at thc :R, ancho California ftt>ad Interchange, it seems unrealistic to assume that 900/~ of this .60°/~ project traflic split will utilize the SP,79/Front Street Interchange. The ~,ancho California Road Interchange provides a much closer means of access to/from the 1-15 for the project than does the SR.79/Front Street Interchange and was only assigned 10% of the ~hare. R~PoN~F.~ T~ COlVIMF. NT,~ 5-5 5-6 5-7 5-8 The Old Town Redevelopmere Project is not forecast to cause any significant impact on local roadways. However, if such a problem should occur in the future,.. the City would develop a deficiency plan for implementation through the RCTC. Please ..refer. to .. responses -_to _comments._S-.2,_Sr3,_ and .5-4 ..... The.. Congestion Management Plan study area 'was explici~y defined by the Riverside County Transportation Commi~iOII, the Congestion Managemere Agency for Riverside County, in a technical "scoping" meeting held April 26, 1994, at the City of Temecula City Hall. Thi-~ study area was endorsed at that _time by C, altrans and the City of Temecula. The City of Temecula believes the scoping meeting identified the roads and road segments that would inan' the most si~rni~icant impact from the projects. The City does not agree that additional traffic impact analysis is required at thi.~ time. Please refer to responses to comment 5-3 and 5-4. No adverse impact due to the Project is forecast to affect the Winchester Roadfi-15 interchange and adjacent surface streets for the reasons outlined in the Draft EIR, Technical Appendices and the above referenced response. Please refer to responses to comments 5-3 and 5-4 which indicate that traffic flow to entertainment facilities will be managed w ensure that the SR-79fi-15 interchange is utilized as the primary access. All Project u-afi~c to/from the north on 1-15 was assumed to utilize either the 1-15/Rancho California Road interchange (10 percent) or the 1-15/SR-79 South interchange (90 percent). The precise distribution or "split" between these two interchanges was based upon (a) the congestion anticipated along Rancho California Road west of 1-15 and along SR-17 South/Western Bypass west of 1-15, (b) the location of the Project's primary off-street parking facilities, and {c) the City of Temecula's expressed desire to encourage (via freeway si.~ning and trnfflc management plans) Project traffic -and Old Town Temecula traffic, in general-to use the 1-15/SR-79 South interchange. Based upon these three factors, the 10:90 "split" was adopted by the City of Temecula. The proposed circulation improvements will ensure adequate quality of traffic flow at this interchange, and the implementation of a traffic management plan in conjunction with Caltrans, California Highway Patrol, and local jurisdictions can ensure that traffic will use this interchange instead of the Rancho Califomiafi-15 interchange. Old Town Kedevelopment Project Draft Environmental impact Report. Cily of'Temecula; Zev Buffman Group; Public Keviow Pe~od De. cemb~' 7. 1994. to January 25. 1995 Jnnunry ! 9. 1995 Page 5-g · When and if a Murrieta/Temecula joint uniform mitigation fee is adopted by both cities, the project should pay its fair shar: toward nitiF, sting deficient fitcilitiu in both Old Towa Red~t Plan Final Foereed RI'R RggPoNgEg TO COMMW. NTg 5-9 Where appropriate and necese~ry, the City of Temecula will fund its fair share under a joint .nlform mitigation fee toward mitigation deficient facilities. L. AN~ U~,.; / d, IRd, UL. ATION PL. AN ,ImBg,TSll:~ ~lPIr.., PLAN Nlllmllff""MIgI~14 AI'I'ACHMENT NO. 12 PRELIMINARY WESTERN BYPASS SCHEDULE e:~r~_mJp.pc2 e/2,~ ewh 4 ~ -w!:STSJD( 5P(ctnc PLAN , I:k'I(RI~f~4[NT 'CC~C' 1rap INS'IPJBUTtON XX(XX) (WCSTSll)[ SPEC~rlC PLAN IPJP Dt. SIRIBUTtON) PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION [~B;aTton-Aschmsn Associates. Inc. CITY OF TEMECULA - OLD TOWN REDEVELOPMENT pROJECT J']~IGUi~ LETTER B18 West Seventh Stnmt.12th floor ~ Los ,edigelem,'C~lo~nla 90017-S435 ,, (2.ss)2.as-leoo * February 2. 1995 Mr. David Hopre, Pm~ City ur're:m~gl, 43174 ]lulinell Park 1)rivo Ten~cula. CA 9Z'~0 ..- Contomcats On IIM~ Drill 9mMm09 1:)ear Mr. Hogan: ']'h'ald(. )*till for thg OppOlltlfii~y (O review and cornremit on thc Draft 1]nvlrOnmcnlal ImpaCl Roport J~}f tllg Old Towq Rdeve. lopmenl Projed. As areawide clc.'ariNlim,um= fear regionally r, ignl~ca.t pmj e, cU, SCAG assisis tillre. coumi~s and oth~ aScncls Io review projmclt and plans for condsteney with regimml plans. The attacin~d commwtts arc mentll to provide guidance for addressing thc propored Projcct wl|hln the contcxt of mtr rcgimml goals and planx, which' ar~ based in part upon slMe IlXl federal mandates m, holm hcrcin. lrynu have any questiota about these commune, ple, asc ctmtact Glenn Blossom (213) 236-18';6. Sincerely, ERIC H. ROTH Manager, InterJovcrnmcntll Reviow ell~mmi Mr. David Hogan Febrd~ry 2, ! 995 Page 3 6-1 ~ s ~ng-~ suig~- *~c ~oj~ will s~e ~ ~rovo ~e ~t~g ~!ats~ ntb in ~e ~br~ in Omt, ~gh 42g !~lng ~iU ~e ~ing p~, ~ ~ ~sui.g ~!d - ~ '~re than oE~.hy dte~t~n of.a~oxim~y-2,~ e~h.~~is- -. 6-2 SCAG ~aff mmnm~s: ~m ~d Toe era U reBed~ ~ a ~vJty cm~ and ua~l~tion __ ~e for ~e City or T~dL o E:~agc ~a~J :~wJn~m in I~IiOM I~U !~ to ~ure ~e ~umer~d ~. o Supra ~iicie~ at~ aoi~u time prue:~ ~n ~a~ area~ Mem~d in in~. :rate. p~. 6-3 ~PAR staff con~muntu: '~c ~j~t ~d bc ~c~ w~h ~mc ~ ~lici~ in ~m it prtsvld~ lhat zm devdopm~tt ~mld bc p~mitt~ within m 61.4~{ o~ kpsee ~ along Munidz ~k whi~ h~= Ihc Praise. o ~c, ura~c mhj~iolJ n~ur~s I~ ~duce ~mi.g l, ~nuin !~.~iuM. mc~ur~ prc~'c~Jufi ~/ biological n,d ~InXicnl ~s.u,.,a' measurez dml ~uld rfdur~ ~rr ~cim,c h~d&'. minlmiz~ e~rlhquaLc ~mu~c ~ m de~lop rmcrEnu~ Fr~a~g md 6 -4 pi~nL SCAG. staff ~mm,~s: 31tC Draa EIR tar Ihc Pmjm G9nla~ Ibnr,ugh malyn~ ewimmn~l Impacts or ds~ Pesej~l ~ I}~c,~ a full ~te of mitigatbn ~uru ~idt Nil~ m ~ ~u~c Io prol~ ez~ting rcgmre~. prnvid~ ~-~ mmu~a ~c cn~iti~ nr Pauj~ ~provsl. ' 'l~e new R~nl Mnhility ChNgcr uf Ihe Rcgioul ~mpr~e~ivc Plan a!~ b~ ~!icia ~inml m 6-5 the Prujm=. O~e of ~e ~t ~,am nf ~uc ~ m, ,,,c ing with Tn~onal~n D~ Maagms~t ~DM) u follows: o Pr~lc ~M jamtrot~ a]o~ N~lh transit a~ ~ring ~L~litiU aZ n Hablg ~ ~n Of the m~r~l tm~Uily pro~rm, ~ilr recognidnt the I~m* u~z o[ 2 See Endrmt~. aID W. Sevelitti 5tiee|,t:hh I.K)ue · t.at AJwJeb&, CA e0017.34~5 f'1 (213)22~,lbOn · FAX 1213)226-182D Old Taw~ II, sd~-BIC:,,i...,~C Fml Focused R~,~PoN.~R.~ TO COMMF. NT~ RESPONSES TO COMMENT L~Ti'~;K #6 SOUTItERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS 6-1 6-2 6-5 Your comment is noted and will be made available m the City Council when it considers the Old Town Redevelopment PrOject for decision. Your cornmere is noted nnd will be made available to the City Council when it considers the Old Town Redevelopmeat Project for decision. Your comment is noted and will be made available to-the City Council when it considers the Old Town Redevelopmeat Project for decision. Your comment is noted and will be made available to the City Council when it considers the Old Town Redevelopment Project for decision. Your comment is noted and will be made available to the City Council whcn-it considers the Old Town Rcdevelopment Projca for decision. The Old Town Redcvelopment Project provides a good opporvmlty for implementing an effective trnn-~portation demand management program. Ms'. David Hogan SCAC CmaunemU en I1~ Draft i!lt far I!s OM Tows i&~' vtla~' ~t Project 6-6 6-7 DT~r, CRiFTInN nF I~n]Fe-T ~11~- proposed old 'Iowa -It~dcvclopmoal.Jsrojm .Is ,3 _jobl.,pgldic/prl~ali .s~calur~ cmmiElin~.¢~r 10 enlen3inmenl lad &uppOtt facilities in the Old Town core area of the City of Temecula. It would Include a 350-rtmm hold wilJa smplusrtiug con.,..'ci'4 m= .ml a 4 ,iron-gist Wild We~t Am we~t nf Old Tom:. The Project would include necessary roads, parking areas, and olher infrastructure in ord~J' to support the redcvclupmist of Old l'uwn- rrovisitm would be made for the consreaction of up to 429 dwelling units in multiple family structures it) mP..cl die nr. cdl of hit,It Clrlployec$ 8f d,e prorinsed ]~r(:ject. There would hc provision ~'~r the prnlcctlon nf a 67.4 acre m~cv'd-l,r-J a'ca as pnte. nda] habital mifigalion add visuel open aftace. 'l~g !~roJC~;I wtmld also include the. linkage of tile Old Town enlertainment facilities with the Wild Wet1 Arena through in.~tallalion nf · ibmned Ironsport 'l~ys:sm along the main =tierid. CON.c;I.cTTI~CY WITI! RRt;IONAI. CnMPRIq!F-NSIVF- PLAN AND P-UII1R pfll.lf'll?.c~ ." The rcccntly adopted Grnwth Management Chaplet (GMC) nfthc 1~cgionzl Cnmprehcnsivc Phm canloins ~t numhe~ of policis that arc particularly applicable m tim Projects. The following are selected growth managnnm pldicles t|f th= GMC in itZ!iL~ ;UKI 2~CAG staff ct~mmc, nts regarding tl,s c(~listcncy nf Ihc Project wllh those po!ieles: 0 EncnurnX~ polltrlaz (U' urb[ltl dtv~,Imaent and Innd uzc ~fdc~ redurz cnslz on jn/raztrUCIUrt mn~lrSlC,nYt and re(dice. imelTer uxe nf rJiujnl ]nc!!iljcs. SCAG ~aff con~mcnts: This i_~ an 'in~ll" project. ]Is !mqx~s= is lu getdin and atbanc~ Ilt~ hislut~(; wintern thmu~ .r the Old !'owH re'ca of the City. o EncnuraXc $uhrr~iOn~ lp drJTne nn r. cnnnmic zlrmeXy m maimnit: ~he economic ~lnl,y oj' 1he · ubreXinn. includinX dje dev~l,lmtcnr mad u~c ~ mm**larli~X prnZrnm~. und nthr. r rcnnnmic itJccrui~s. w~i(.A ~u, upgri n,ninnaonl nJr suhregional toai~ and JgolicirL .~CAG .blff camrod, s: 'Fhi, pnqmscd redcvchspmont prnjcct dc~ignul ~nund Ihe Iheme of the 'old west' represents at Good example nflhe t~pe of etx~nomic stnuegy envisioned by Ibis regiomd plan palicy. It is anticipated Ihxl tlu; Pr,ject would alLPact a aig:dficaqt sea,droP nf lnutisf/fnnn ouudd0 the region as well ~.~ r~idcnts from within thc region. See Enclnole. 810 W. ~,4vonth Slreel,121h Floor , Los AnDlie&, CA I;U01?-:)43S I1 {213) 23&.lg00 · FAX {2131236-1125 Old Toam ~t Plan FinalFoeusedl~R R~,~PON,~.~ Tf~ CC~MM~-NT,~ 6-6 6-7 Your comment is noted and will be made available to the City Council when it considers the Old Town Redevelopmerit Project for decision. Your comment is noted and will be made available to the City Council when it considers the Old Town Redevelopmere Project for decision. 6-9 Mr. David Hogan February 2, 199~ PaSo 4 "~rafi mR ppla. The Draft FIR addresscs TDM pingins in Appcndlz L4 whim Is rdcffed to as the Barton Aschman 1~ Rewmmendadnm. Tho lad itcm in this apfH:mdia is worded as follows: 6-8 "A Transportation Matmgement Plan should be dm, oloped width includes local/internal uarfic circularlos and parking rgqob'emem of the Project. This plan should addten both vehicular and pedestrian drculaaion, including tim Projuct's propostal people°mover and shutde sysmms.' It it not clear bewov0r. from thc lmmma~ prnvjdntt in Tatde ~o1 of thss Draft FAR. thus this mitigafinn snca.'mtc hu hscn proposed to be implemented is a condition of approval for Projoct. :. SCAG spnff cnmmcnn. Thce. nvirmunontal documentsdos for Ibe Project should be clarified to rcquirc prcp~ratinn nfa Transpm ntkm Mamsge. n~.nt Plan flint includes tht, fonturns recommended in the liarton A~chnms 1996 Rccnmmgmdatkmx. CONCI.USIONS AND RpCOMMP-~fiATIONS As dcscrlbod in Ihc Draft EIR, fhc Pmjcct appears to be su|mtant"mlly conslqent with regional goals and ptdicim wilh the tm~ ptas~le exception noted alive. All mitigation meaxttr~ ar,.r, odatcd with any npprnved prt,jcct should be tntmitorod in accordan4;~ with AD 3180 requirmnenla. SOU'rl i!rJtN CAIAFORNIA A.~'~)CIATION OF GOVERNMENTS and Authorisi~ SCAG !s a Joini Pos, cr~ ARdrawc! cscLahlixlaed u,glcr C~ifmnia ~n~t Code S~n ~ e Under I~at ~ sntc law, SCAG ~ dsignal~ s a ~u~il of ~vem~a (COG), a ~eg~nal TfallS~fi~liun Planning ACcs~y (R~A), aml a Mdr, qmlilan Plamhq: ~rg~t~sn (MPO). ~CAG*s lilalMlalk~ lil[~ a~ f~nkibilitle& i.cludc the ftdlnwing: ~CAG is designated by 1he fcdcTal Covcrn~c-,-~! ms dwc Rclkm's Me#ropoli~a,~ lqnnfnZ Orgmsiz~iom and nmndated to wainlain a continuing, c~x~'~erative. and cnmprchc~tivc Irlmsl~nalion Piasn~nll prnct~_~ rntahing in a R~g~/ud Tramspofiation Plan and a Roglonal Transpt~rladon lmpmvmtw-nt l~rngram !mnuam to 23 U .S.C. §134(g)-0a). 49 U.S.C. §1607(f)-tg) el seq.. 23 P...F.R. ~450. and 49 C.F.R. ~613. SCAG is also thc de..~lgnatcd Regionat 7~rnlt~porl~liOII amlaaslin*,E ,Agency, and as msdt ~ rupo,,,dhlc fro' Imth IsIS W. Seventh 51fcc$.121h timof · LOs Asqle0g~. CA 90007-3a35 o (21:}) Z3&-IIIOG e FAX (213) 2'Mp1112} O~ Tawn R~$ew~mmeai Fin~! Foam~ 6-8 Mitigation measure 423,14 requires the preparation of a 'ride share" program and measure 42.3,16 requires the provision of preferential parking for car and van pool employees. These measures were used to implement the transportation management plan requirement by the Project, Measure 4,2.3,14 wffi.be. revised..to.inchde the requirement of a transportation management plan in addition w the required ride share program. This mitigation measure will be implemented as a condition of approval of the proposed project, Your comment is noted and will be made available to' the City Council when it considers the Old Town Redevelopment Project for decision. A mitigation monitoring and reporting progrsm will be implemented by the City for thi.g_ Project in accordance with AB 3180 requirements, ~r. David Hopm Pubmary 2. 19g~ prr. paratiou uf dsc Regkml Tmlspormimw Plan (RTP) and Regional Traasportadon Improvcmcal Program (RT!P) undrx California G~va'mmal G4,d~ Sr. cdcm 65080. SCAG is rmpoadble fur dovdoping the dmmFaphic projeai~M ~ b imMm~ !a~ me, ,hahg, m l. ~ ~ ~at~n pmgr~. ~urm, ~ ~atellm C~I ~ ~u~mt hm ~r B~!u D~- SCAG is rcs~!c u~ dm P.le~ CIm Xi; Aa .- damtinin~ Pmgra~ ~ ~ Air ~n. N~uant ~ 42 U.S.C. i75~- . Pu~uant tu ~ifn~a Govcrnm~t C~c S~iuB ~089.2. $CAG CoijRiMion Manq~M Rans (CMPI) for w~l~q w~h ~gion~ tm~poln f~ r~ul~ by S~l.ion ~080 of th~ Gn~nm~t C~e. ~AG mu~ alu, ~alugg ~ t~,~g~m~ a~ ~}~t~]liiy uf SCAG ~ th~ amhor~d r~iu~l ai~cy br I~e~meald Rerig~ of Progrin pro~ br fd~l financial m~ a~ dir~ devdopmmg a~ivitl~, pursuant K, ~t~identlal F~gutive ~ 12,3~ SCAG r~vigwi, purRuant Io Public Itffimur~ Q~e S~~n~ 210~ ~ 21~, ~p~e~al !m~ R~o~& of pro, J~s of regiotml Slgni~n~ for ~lst~cy with fegbnal pla~ !hlifomlm Envitunn~tai ~ality A~ Guiddim Sg~bns I~ ~ Pursuant to 33 XJ,S,C, t1288(a)~) (S~tion 208 or d~ ~ Wat~ Pollution Control Act), $CAG tim audau/~ A~c W~t 7~ze~ Mn~rme~ ~an~nf ~e~. SCAG is r~lmMiblc for pr~iun of the Retioa~ .Hum'lag Ne~' ~nle~, punuam to C~ifnnth ~vernn~t C~o $~ion SCAG k r~pnibl= (wida th~ Sun Dido A~iatbn of CnuntylCi~ Arn ~lann~g C~Nn~il) f{~ pffi~nl the ~auafem¢~ Plan puriuant to ~lifoa'ala )lallh a~ Saf~y C~c S~bu ~135.3. 818 W. Savebib ~trelt, l.2111 Fieor · Ler, AnOm,. CA 900f/-:~4'3B IJ (213)/36-1800 · FAX (213) 236-18'25 ATTACHMENT NO. 12 EXHIBITS R:%FOFIVlS~TAFFRPT.CC 6rilgS Idb 85 CITY OF TEMECULA RI-! M H OLD TOWN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT EXHIBIT- A GENERAL PLAN LAND USE PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: MAY 15, 1995 CITY OF TEMECULA C) R-A-m0, o -° OLD TOWN REDEVELOPMENT EXHIBIT B PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: MAY 15, 1995 ZONING MAP CITY OF TEMECULA OLD TOWN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT EXHIBIT- C MASTER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: MAY 15, 1995 CITY OF TEMECULA LAN~ U..~:~ / C, II~..,ULATION PLAN · . Isalsq. OLD TOWN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT ExHmn'- D WESTSIDE SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USE PLAN PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: MAY 15, 1995 CITY OF TEMECULA OLD TOWN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT EXHIBIT - E TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 28011 PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: MAY 15, 1995 R:~T~.!~C MIO~j lfib ITEM 16 APPROVA CITY ATTORNEY TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Anthony Elmo, Chief Building Official/~ June 13, 1995 : Public Nuisance Abatement - 30301 Nicolas Rd RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council conduct a public hearing end: 1. Approve a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 95- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, CONRRMING THE CITY'S COSTS OF ABATING THE PUBLIC NUISANCE AT 30301 NICOLAS ROAD, TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA AND DIRECTING THAT SUCH COSTS SHALL CONSTITUTE A UEN AGAINST THE PROPERTY AND REPEALING RESOLUTION NO 95-40. 2. Direct that such costs be recorded against the property as a special assessment. DISCUSSION: On April 25, 1995, the City Council held a public hearing to confirm the costs to the City of the abatement of a public nuisance at 30301 Nicolas Road. It has come to our attention that the property's owners were not properly notified of that public hearing date. Therefore, to assure that all property owners are given the opportunity to address this issue before the City Council, it will be necessary to rehear public testimony rergarding this matter. On approximately May 11, 1993, Code Enforcement received a complaint regarding an alleged public nuisance located at 30301 Nicolas Rd. After inspection of the premises revealed the existence of weeds, trash, debris, and unsecured dilapidated buildings, abatement proceedings were initiated in accordance with the provisions of Ordinance 90- 24 for Public Nuisance Abatement. Notices were subsequently sent to all known owners by both first class and certified mail. In an effort to determine the extent of the nuisance condition, an inspection warrant was applied for and granted by the local district court judge. An inspection was then performed Agenda Report June 13, 1995 Page 2 revealing construction debris, concrete foundations, trash and debris throughout the property. As a result of this inspection, staff proceeded to declare the property a public nuisance, requesting that the nuisance be abeted in a timely fashion. UpOn expiration of the requested abatement period, a hearing was held before an independent hearing officer which resulted in the City being given the authority to cause the abatement of the nuisance condition. Staff obtained the required abatement warrant end has subsequently the property to be cleared of all nuisance conditions. The total cost of abatement of this property is ~68,856.75. A breakdown of costs which make up this total is as follows: Environmental Control Systems, Inc. 58,600.00 Attorney's fees 8,297.64 Administrative costs 525.00 Staff costs 1.434.11 Grand Total ~68,856.75 FISCAL IMPACT: On October 12, 1994, Council approved an appropriation of ~58,600 to account no. 001-162-999-5250,Other Outside Services, for the abatement of the nuisance from the property. The additional attorney fees have been expended and recorded in the legal services department budget and the remaining administrative and staff cost have been expended and recorded in the Building and Safety Department budget. These costs will be offset through the recording of the special assessment against the property. V:~TONY~AGI~]DA~01.PH 5/22/95 lab RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF ~ C1TY COUNCIL OF Tnr. CITY OF TI~IECULA, CAt,tl~~ CONFIRMING Tar. CrrY'S COSTS OF ABATING ~ PUBLIC NUISANCE AT 30301 NICOLAS ROAD, T~VIECYff,~, C~LrsrORNIA AND DIRECTING THAT SUCH COSTS SILALL CONSTrruT~ A t,n~T AGAINST ~ PROPERTY AND IeEPEAI,~TG RESOLUTION NO. 9S-40. WI:mRKa, S, tl~ lyropeny located at 30301 1T~colas Road, Temecula, Cnllfornh (the"Property") was deckred a public wn, ipnce pursuant to a duly noticed Nuisance Abatement Heating held before a h~uring officer;, and WHEREAS, the owner of the Frolnty did not abate the md~sn_~ on the Property as directed by the order issued by the hearing officer pursuant to Temecula M, mlcipal Code section 8.12.080; Va4PREAS, the City obtained an Abatement Warrant from the Rivehide County Municipal Court to abate the public nuisances located on the Property and abated the nuisances; and ~, Temecula Municipal Code section 8.12.120 anthotizes the City to keep an accounting of all of its costs to abate public n,,iMncea, inchltllng incident1 expenseel; and WHEREAS, the City inutrted the following expenses in abating t!~ public md.~nce8 on the FTotm~: contractors, $58,600.00; s_n__nrney fees, $8,297.64; sdminigl~ative colits, $525.00; and staff costs, $1,434.11; and ~, the City Council does hereby repeal Resolmion No. 95-40 approved at the reguhrly scheduled meeting of May 23, 1995; NOW, ~ORB, BE IT RBSOLVED by the City Council of the City of Temecuh as follows: A) That the above recitations are true and correct; That the City incurred costs in the mount of $68,856.75 in abating the public nuisances on the Property: c) That the $68,856.75 cost of abating the public nuisances on the Pwpeny shall constitute a special assessment against the Fropeny and shah constitute a lien ow~thePwpertyo V:~TONY~O!~DA~.~O9~.Rit 511a/95 Man PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOFInn this day of ,199~. Idfx~ E. Stone, Mayor- ATTP, ST: June S. GnU, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIPORNIA) COUNTY OP RlVlmSIDE) SS OTY OPTm~n~o'LA ) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, l-ll:ml:~Ry DO CP.,KllP'Y that the foregoing Resolution No. 95- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of T~m~ia on th~day of , 1995, by th~ following roll call vote. COUNCn-M]~IBERS: NOES: COUNTERS: COUNCII,MEMBERS: June s. Greek, City Clerk V:~TONY~AO!INDA~I~Og~-.RR 5111/~ Ida ITEM 17 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT APPROVAl ~ CITY ATTORNEY IFINANCE OFFIC R CITY MANAGE TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Council/City Manager Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney : June 13, 1995 ~ Winchester Road/Interstate 15 Interchange Improvements Project Acquisition of Real Property .- PREPARED BY: J. Robert Flandrick, Burke, Williams & Sorerisen Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital P~ojects RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: Conduct the hearing, review the evidence presented, including this staff report and public comments and close the hearing; and Adopt the attached Resolution of Necessity authorizing the commencement of eminent domain proceeding so as to acquire the Interests (Note: This requires an affirmative FOUR-FIFTHS (4/5) vote of the City Council; and Direct the City Attorney to file the action expeditiously; and Issue two (2) Warrants, totaling the sum set forth, payable to the Clerk of Superior Court, in the amounts respectively of $411,650 (KR Palm Plaza Properties) and $37,250 (Mervyn's Properties); and Authorize the City Manager to execute all documents necessary to acquire the properties, including, without limitation, the forms necessary to obtain Caltrans certification of right-of-way. BACKGROUND: The Winchester Road/Interstate 15 Interchange Improvements Project consists of widening the overcrossing from four (4) lanes to seven (7) lanes, the addition of a north bound loop entrance to I-15, realignment of the north bound exit ramp, relocation of the existing traffic signals, and landscape and irrigation improvements. This project is · Class I Categorical Exemption from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). In compliance with CEQA and NEPA this project is eligible for Categorical Exemption/Categorical Exclusion (CE/CC) classification under Section 1510. 1 , Class 1 of the Caltrens Environmental Regulations, pursuant to Section 21094 of the Public Resources Code, and pursuant to CEO A regulations contained in Section (40CFR-1508.4), and FHWA regulations in Section (23 CFR-771.117) of the Federal Register. The purpose of the acquisition is for public street, drainage and freeway purposes and all uses appurtenant thereto. Parcel A is owned by the Mervyn's Company and consists of approximately 3,055 square feet. The total ownership of the parcel, which is in use as a parking facility for a regional shopping center, is 0,070 acres. Parcel B is owned by KR Palm Plaza Limited Partnership and is also in use for parking facilities for a regional shopping center. The acquisition proposed is for 1.061 acres or approximately 46,236.35 square feet. Discussions with representatives of the owners of the two (2) parcels involved as of this time, have not resulted in settlements. Submitted with this staff report are copies of the offers the City made each of the two (2) property owners which offers are required to be made pursuant to applicable law (see Appendix "A"). In addition, submitted herewith are copies of the Notice of Hearing which was given to each of the two (2) property owners by First Class Mail, in accordance with the applicable statutes (see Appendix "B"). - It is necessary at this point for the City Council to conduct a public hearing to consider the adoption of a resolution of necessity which would authorize the filing of condemnation proceedings to acquire Parcels A and B. Notice of this hearing was timely given in the manner prescribed by law. Appraisals have been obtained for each of the Parcels sought to be acquired (see Appendix "C"). Enclosed are: ae a brief summary of each of the appraisals reflecting. the values which were utilized by the City in making the r.equired offers to the property owners; and b. a map depicting the location of the Parcels proposed for acquisition. After conducting the public hearing, if the City Council finds that the public necessity so requires it, the City Council should adopt the resolution authorizing condemnation proceedings for the purpose of acquiring the Parcels which are described in the draft of the said resolution, attached. The findings which need to be made are as set forth in a draft of a Resolution of Necessity which is transmitted herewith. Questions relating to value are not relevant to this proceeding. However, that does not mean that negotiations for the acquisition of the Parcels are at an end. If the Council adopts the Resolution of Necessity after the hearing, the staff will contact the property owners and attempt to reach agreement on the value to be paid for each of the Parcels in question. However, in order to meet time constraints, the City Attorney should be instructed to file the necessary condemnation action. FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate funds are available in the General Fund for the acquisition of the two (2) parcels required to construct the proposed interchange improvements. In addition, funds have been appropriated in the Redevelopment Agency CIP Fund Account No. 280-165-602-5700for the acquisition of the parcels by the Redevelopment Agency from the City. r:.'tegdrpt%95~,0613~winehl!E.pmlalp Attachment: 1. Resolution 95- r:.~gdmt~6~0613~wtndVlS.ixe/ejp RESOLUTION NO. 95- _, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE C1TY OF TEMECULA FINDING AND DETERMIN]NG THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN PROPERTY FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES (WINCHESTER ROAD/INTERSTATE 1~ INTERCHANGE IMPROV]~fi~qTS) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES I~-~-RY RF_~OLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Temecula (hera 'City') hereby finds,: determines and declares as follows: A. The public interest, convenience and necessity require the acquisition by said City of certain interests ("Interests") in and to certain real property ("Property') located in the City, the County of Riverside, State of California for public street and fre~way proposed and all uses appurtenant thereto ("Project"); and B. The Project is planned or located in a manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and least private injury; and C. The inking of the Interests as above described is necessary for the stated Project and such taking is authorized by Section 19, Article I of the California Constitution, Section 37350.5 and Section 40400 et sea_., of the California Government Code, Section 1230.010 et seq, of the California Code of Civil Procedure, and other applicable law; and D. The offer to purchase required by California Code Section 7267.2 has been made to each owner of the Interests proposed to be acquired by the City. Section 2. The City Council of the City hereby declares that it is its intention to acquire said Interests in its name in accordance with the provision of the hws of the State of California with reference to condemnation procedures, for public street and freeway purposes, and all uses appurtenant thereto. Section 3. That if any of the Interests have been appropriated to some public use, the public uses to which they are to be applied by the City, as described above, are more necessary and paramount public uses. Section 4. Said Interests hereinabove referred W, the acquisition of which is required by said public interest, convenience and necessity for the purposes set forth in Section 1. hereof, is located in the City of Temecuh, County of Riverside, State of California, and are more particularly described on Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, as set forth in full. A map showing the general location of the Interests sought to be acquired in this proceeding is attached hereto, marked Exhibit B and incorporated herein by reference and made a pan hereof. r:.~gdmt'~S~Oel 2.~wtnohll Section S. The City Attorney and the firm of Burke, Wi111sm.~ & Sorensen, as special counsel, under the direction of the City Attorney, are authorized and directed to prepare, institute and prosecute in the name of the City such proceedings in the proper Court having jurisdiction thereof as may be necessary for the acquisition of said Property described in Section 4. Section 6. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. Section 7. This Resolution shall be effective immediately upon its adoption. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 13th day of June, 1995. Jeffrey E..Stone, Mayor ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) CITY OF TEMECULA ) SS I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 95- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 13th day of June, 1995, by the following vote: CO~CILMEMBEP, S: NOES: COUNCIIAIEMBERS: CO~CILlW~-~ERS: ABSTAIN: - COUNCILMEltS: r.%egdmt~610613~winehll 6.1mmldp ~n easement ~n, over, under, alor~ and across the following desc~ibed real propezJcy for public street and freeway purposes '- and all uses appurtenant thereto, inaluding any and all abutter~s rights,. including access rights, appurtanant to KR Palm Plaza#s remaining proper~, ~n and to the area included Within the easement as follovsz 'That portion of Parcel 1 of Parcel Nap No. 23430 as shorn by map on £ile in Book 168 of Parcel Naps, Pages 7 through 9 thereof, Records of R~verside County, State of California, being described as follows: BECIN~N3 at the Soughvest corner of said Parcel 1, also being a point on the Easterly line of that certain parcel of land conveyed to the ~cate of California by deed recorded July 12, 1973 as being Instrument No. 90990, Official Records of said Rive~side County; Thence N.76e14tlSNE- along the Southerly line of said Parcel 1, also being the Northerly line of Parcel 9 of said Parcel Xap No. 23430, a distance of 39.25 feet; Thence N.01e41~00NE., a distance of 99.23 feet; Thence N.07e22~00e;., a distance of 89.56 feet; Thence N.04s06~07eE., a distance of 139.27 feet~ Page I of 3 ~hence Northerly on a curve coneave Westerl:~ having a radius of 240.00 feet, ~_hraLtgh an angle of 45*57'34e, an arc length of 192.51 feet; ~hsnce N,17s56~'00wW., a distance of 104.04 feet to a point on said Easterly line of parcel of land conveyed to the S~ate of' California, also being on the Westerly line of said Parcel 1; Thence Southerly along said line on a non-tangent, curve concave Easterly, having a radius of 200.00 feet~ through an angle of 37e12'35w, an arc length of 129.89 feet (the initial radial line bears N.SS°14'16wW); Thence continuing along said line S.05s26#51mE., a distance of 318.19 feet; Thence continuing along said line Southerly on a curve concave Easterly, having a radius of 1200.00 feet, through an angle of 08°18'51,, an arc length of 174.13 feet, to the Point of Beginning. The above described parcel of land contalns 46,236.35 s~uare fee~ (1.061 acreS), more or less. Page 2 of 3 an easement in, oyez, along end across the following described proper~y Zor public drainage purposes and all uses appur~enant thereto: That portion o~ Parcel 1 of Parcel Fap No. 23430 as shown by map on file in Book 168 of Parcel ~aps, Pages 7 through 9 thereof, Records o~ Riverside County, State of California, being described as lollors: COID41~CI3~G at the Southwes~ corner of said Parcel 1, also being the Northwest corner of Parcel 9 of said Parcel l(ap No. 23430; Thence B, '76 · 14 ' 18 ":E, along the ~outhezly line o~ sa.'[d ~aroel 1, also being the Norbherly line of said l:,aroel 9, a d.i. etance of 39,25 £ee~, t.o the Poj.n'b of Beg'i.nninq of the easementt: to be described ~ Thence continuing N.76"14f18"E-, along said line, a distance o£ 27.79 feet; Thence H.01°38'20"E., a distance oZ 7.62 Thence N.88°21'40"W., a dlstance of 26.78 Thence S.01~41'00"W-, a distance of 15,00 feet to the Point of Beginning. The above described parcel o~ land contalns 302.91 square feet (0.006 acres), more or less. u,,uxas~0.3 Page 3 of 3 An easement in, aver, under, alenV and acFoss the .following des~ibed real propar~ for public street and freeray purposes end all uses appurtenant thereto, includfi~ any and all abutter's rights, includ~ng access rights# appurtanant to Zal Palm Plaza's remaining property# ~n and to the a~ea included within the suemeat as follows: That por~ion of Parcel 9 of Parcel Kap No. 23430 as shown by map on file ~n Book 168 of Parcel Maps, Pages 7 through 9 thereof, Re~ords of lttverside County, S~ate of California, being described as follows: BEGINNING at the Nor~hv~t corner of said Parcel 9, also being e point on the Easterly line of that certain parcel of land conveyed to the State of California b~ dead recorded =uly 12, 1973 as Ins~tqamen~ No. 90990, Official Records of said Riverside County; Thence N.?e=14'18'E. along the Northerly line of said Parcel 9, also being ~he Southerly l~ne of Parcel 1 of said Parcel Hap No. 23430, a dis~nce of 39.25 feet; Thence S.01041'00uW.# a distance of 62.05 feat; Thence S.0S°SS'0D~E.# a distance of 86.71 feet; Thence S.19°10'5IuE-, a distance of 63.79 feet, to a point of said Easterly line of pa~cel of land conveyed ~o the State of California, also being on the Westerly l~na of said Parcel 9; ~z~x Page 1 of 3 Thence Northerly along said line on a non-tangen~ curve concave Easterly, havix~ a radius of 1200.00 feet, through an an~le of 10e02t59e, an arc lenVth of 210.48 feat (the initial radial 'line bears 5.66ell'lgnW.), to the Point of Beginning. The above described parcel of land oontains 3,055.00 equate. feet (0.070 acres), more or less. Page :~ of 3 An easenen~ J.n, over, along and across the des~d p:o~ ~o~ ~bl~c ~n~ge p~oses an~ all uses ~a~ ~ion of P~cel 9 of P~cel ~p No. 23430 ~p on file ~ Bo~ 1~8 of ~cel ~ps, Pages 7 ~gh 9 ~eof, Re~r~ of ~side Co~t~, ~te of ~lifo~a, ~g des~~ as follows: CO~~C a~ ~e N~~t corn~ of said P~I 9, also ~g ~e Sou~west c~ of P~cel 1 of said P~cel ~p No. 23430~ ~~ N.76e14'18eE. along ~s No~erl~ line of P~i also behg ~e Soundly line of said P~cel 1, a dis~ce of 39.25 Zest ~ ~e Po~t of Begi~g of ~e easu~= ~0 be descr~d; ~ence conthu~g N.TSe14'lS~X. along said l~e, a dis~ce of 27.79 feet; ~ence S.01e38'10~W., a die~nce of 22.38 ~eet~ ~ence N.88e21'40~W., a dis~n~ of 26.80 leers '- Thence N.01e41'00~E.~ a disChue of 15.00 fee= ~o ~e Poin~ of Begi~ing. ~e ~e d~~ p~cel of la~ con~i~ ~00.79 ~ee~ (0.011 acres), ~re or less. Page 3 of 3 APPENDIX "A" f:.~agd;t~95~613%winehi16.plell WifiQIIIIIer ~ IkiL,,4f,4L;. 16 ~ QQ1 end 1621H N:'N: mO-,qQ04}Ol (A Poreon Of) The CIty of Tefymoule I~ 'preparing to improw ~ Wincheslet off romp edt on ~hs -IrllmlimllilntieCItydTm Pubk:reoxdslnclka~UmtY°Lrcx:fnlanYk~ks OWnerofmelaneofwhichaportionbrmsdedtorthspuk/K=ktqxovmnat IsF,,4y:mdtooffer'~&e~.OO*iQrapodim~Imndandin~v;w adrairmgelesem/d(See~ksgald--*r~.~onanclPIBtmaP). 1) ~nw adOk~m plum !wo ~ miOnmm oopae of b'm~k~x~umNo~ AOremw~ doaj~m~m~venlfyouclonotKx:xaptmeQIlir;tl"myml~" vmilk:don purpoee only). Page2 P.4 1:~Smeen~~dB Lm. and P. Thenk you for your wedreed ooopemlio~ TIIle%4SuNey AcqthNon Pdicy Act d 1070 Your Propcry. Your Transportsdon Project NRBORNE. EXPRESS NO. 2388445031 NOIE: THIS LETTER IIENT VIA NRBORNE EXPRE,S8 MAIL TO THE ABOVE MAIMNO ADDRE~. APN: ~(apodk~ol) 'The nmk~value olem lNoperty bdnO aczldred kinseed upon arned~vdJe ~ '--I pllll}e/Sd kl g:XXXdma(a aith ."' yl!~f 'Vpl"'Tv~ FI~ffT.~"'et 'The ridnil iS based t4xmen malyeiSOla~cra,,H--~"' PmPmliNinlhe~dcinllYofhsubjeGt pmpaty. Patrol:001 ,,, FeeTlie ,, 4&236e,L Pafcd: 15~IH ,,, Dielunge Easement .,, 81)2,91 $,f, ~ ~f P.~: 001 ,kv. ,h!Uoq: 4e~86 s.f. · r/'.0o per e.f. - lZg, lm2.oO $ Inmrovem SSSmSdngspacss. (sis ~ evs/sp~cs) eSshubs@~ epdnkW system (40~i7 e.f. ~ $.4a/s.f.) (,4o,m7 s.L @ 4LaO/s~) L.A.'d~a~V8 Idaride; (e lalende eleo :.t. g ft.4o/e.f.} ralQ:_,~:, i~tga~ion equipmere (t00 Lf. e lB. ooa.f.) 800.00 Ckx'mmct midends (160 if, e~ $'lO.O0/Lf.) L. enc~egr:k,e ~medeaOe.'L Rentpplng lOO. oo 78Q. m Toil 6411,651.00 f,41~,,OOO.oo J'lJH 85 'cJ5 12:42 DEPT. -,,.J ,,./ ~ ~TEMEOULA DEEEB Zg EUB~&Ei P.? ~%.jh_: mo-~o-om (apmum~ P~om IG:l PALM PLAZA UMITED PARI~IERBHIP~ ANILJ..INC~UIMTEDP~ TheCrlyOF~hefebynmkeeymamolwd1411,125.OOasthe Vouamnmmqukedlovacd~yourpmpe~dpEpm~tl'mPtm:hale. ixl~hmbemrmdeawkl~by~- ~_~ lilt such m caw his been nude. 'F~ atmchod pe,..l~iat exl?lalre your THi9 19 NOT A COIffiIACT TO PU~E, BUT MERELY AN OFFER TO PURCIIAgB FOR ~ AMOIJNI' INDIGAYED MOVE. PATBY L., VALEN~ ofmeabewotferlhb dayof , 1995. I(RpALMPLAZALJMfII~PARTNERGHIP, AN ILUNQ!~ LI~ PARTHB~HIP P.8 2'rAI2M.2NI 11~ ,!U2I cQMP2N2&IIQ~ I:!..*: ~ r.vlslen el Ihe Riveaide CoumV ,PqSeveee Aaenw~-~:ffne 6emtmmi~rn~epaeeamluMngpdvaleW'ePetYnec"m: aflorpublcae. In ~,fnpiJk~vAmlmnllonlm ~IIwUmII~A._ ~,.AimFaimu~'mmmtDmmd Pmpety ArqU~ltlan Pellclee Act d 1970, Public !.8w mAal~ amxI/of (:~ 'le of !:)Iriskin I ol'l'lll~ I of llw Govgmfnent Ccxk, an mallmm~ dJud cnTq:enkdke in the atom, me d'$411,12LIN) hes been madebb inlered'b be -"q .' ~1 b your p~ lees then the apprabef's cCnlon of fair marie N whi=h he V' ~,,kw.:l dtef a pexmd k~mp mc~n of yex pmpm~, ,e whk:h tme, ~ or your ,,,,,..f_~ Areire were IIFFIN~ OF FNR MARI(I=T VALm n: Theder~nolMkn~v~mlmNmpkmlmeemlnMeon~lnSeceon I~.,~Q of gin Code el'CIvil Procedure of ~ ~ 1= quotKI In pm't m follows. · (e) Thcfekmed~mofmeWclxe/teianis~whlghestPeeonl~edme olvaluallon lrel would be agreed ~ I~N e, being wiing b eall but under no ~ a' Went necese/~r e 6ein~, nor ~lg.d to amal, ell theme end puq;x;m~for~di:h the Fopety k ~ly adaptabb PegelofS i ~J~es P.9 LAI~ANDIMFROVEMB e411,1:oAe ,.in, ~on ~!um~ ~G,,,~rm~ LECxAI.~(~ FwewimplwlmeWlhwmwllxQpwd),inlhmC~VW mw.~m~,mm, iDoun&y~l~k~e. ~lmiim~O ml/ommlm. d,,m:m4bed EXH~BM' "A" i ~ laS; '95 12=43 Z)E::PT. OF ra .riG. SERV 989-2'?5-4837 P. lo ~ieaeopyofqremmll~BreeeeRegedlngYeurRIgleUMeme Unlbnn I'lulgr, eq:m/'.._-s:m ~ Reel Prel)efiy A~uleltm b Act d 1970. Thereempeea~edngd~e propety. Yes No ~ In budrmn,e being conduc/d Ym No ere Nng or ere ~ Imu:~se on me propwry (lmbjulng ownerffinoceupmoy): ehenemeencladmeee, $1grmlm'~ on II~ form do not ~ qimenm~t on vdue, but only e to irdi~,~d~ R~eipt d a.m Ioenn. Sierraurn by owner(s) r~&dk't9 rdoc~on esslstanee irfonmton doem nollnmywayob~ga!~ owner(s), but only senms to provide the agency wilhir~m'm/JonfotrelocMionplanring. KRPALMR.AZA;PAR/NERgJ.IP, ~ II_l-INOB LIMITED PARTNEI:I~HIP PATBY L V~ Real Pro.perry Agent II PLV:ms :. 5ERV g89-Z'/'5-4837 P.11 Exhibit A ~No. 13ge0. OftdFteooe~dNldlivemid~Cow~. ThMx~N.7e~14,l S~_along~he!loulhe~liadMidPamdl. dsobeinglhe Nocl~dyine ofpsmd gd mld Pamd Map M~.23,t30. acktanm d31L~bet; Thetree N.NeO6'0T'E., at dbtarme od 130.27 feet; hNa N~rthedy ;n · curve co.~--'ve Wemdy laving · mcOue of J~,~OO feet, Ihrough en angled45eS'/'A4',snamlenglhct1~..51 led: ThenoeN.17*Gt00'W.,edisanceof10,L04faetluap~teeseldEaudedyhotparCdd Thenee Southerly along Wd aM m a ne,,-angem ca're concave EneMy, hamg a minus of 200.00 lent. tru'ouOh an angle of 37'12'H". an am length 0f.129.8g lee (the trdtiN radii line been H.SB'14k16' WI: Thence ce'stidn9 along MId gne 8.(ile'2eS'l'E-, a dklance d 818.19 feet; ' b .mtinuing mka~ mad fine Southedy on muuffe oomave btedy, hadng a radlus d ~20o. OOfeet, Ibmugh an qle of Orl~S~', an am length of 174.13feet, to Ihe Point d Beginning. The above deem'ibed peroel of land oonlabs 48,286.85 square leer (1.061 ec~es), morn or · 95 1H:44 ExhibitA P, 12 P. 14 Y,1NCHES'~R&I-t5 00t ma~eao-om ACY'XW ~ 3. 4 TMB di~a.i nm.t b made by eml belmem llm i~'!YC)FI"UF~Iw J, I~m e eiJled 'QTY', and ICII PALM PLAZA LIMITED PARTN~IEHIP, AN LJJNOI6 UMITED 6 pAITTNIRilP, iif/~c/Jed"erantm'. enmlar I~s exm2uted and will ~ 1o PATBY L VN.ENZLELA, Reel 8 . ~gg6, ~e~lfyln~ AI~!: g10-800~01 (a porUon oQ Pan:d O~l, in conddmalian dwh~h ibmuludy Nreed gt:l~, 9 : :].o 1. Th~Cityd~d!: 3.~ ram, tarried), m'd trams mmept ~ose enaalbmr~e8 end eeeenems which, in ~e sole :discretlanaftheCl~,emmle, :L5 ;toilowingmmmm. · e 1. Mmdm~/~d~!lbepmm~l,l~d, and Code, .. ].8 ~, .C. Aylsaultxxtmd'mlaytmmthewnounlmhownln :~9 mhlAhereil~lrlyunpildtim~toge~erwllhpBmdlie~oo~tBndinl~m~themo~ ~0 andenybond~oriee~rnef~lhKezudueonlhedabiirdebtrlxlefredto, orP'~j~nn P,8 blu~li,,XJor~Bnd ~ilb instrancsisdm|md byC~ty, lhepmmbn~lh~c- 24 A- Indermly, ddmd, palect, mrdhoidCil~,reollcem, z., ~'S agents. 8jccessmt and mlOr- tree and hr.,,,J.$ from and eOelrst my end all clime, Be feee,~,e~ing~om or oamed in whole or ln ixn, direoW or indirecW, bY ellher (e) ~,w lxeeenoe ln, an, wlltm, under, mabout~he Pmmd a(hmamous nm~"~ls.t~,~- P. 15 etalq.:'iwll_ ',k)UlM1~l'qk ;, , .~ ,iufkJ~&d~C.~1801, etseq-;b. · Rmom~end Reoo~y~42U-&C, aeceon eeO1, ekm-:and Ibm Ij'~/,X,.~cleilfledmhlgafdoamlnBechnS117ofb(:bal:wnb~~ s ~eletyCodeorlltldmmlu"'Arl~H!nSeclion~BSledtheP"-,,' HedlhandBakt~ t AnyandalnamyspeVebleunclert/eofdre~uPWendmaudinO emtolal an~xmt of unpaid Ixincipel and ~on the nom eeotHd by Deed of Truet · 3,,e cn~p~d Dacv,t:rt~1998, abalmmeutlio. Slger/.(Xkid Reoofa of FIJverdde b~F/'W W INovicle areoonveyefme ee W,eJ~N: iHO-a004X~ (a porla~ of)/Ptmd · ;& .and to bTdah Grantor with good end eu.'_Q:erd receipt dsoea~ maid mcumys credited 15 .as 6rawnorWauthorUmm~cnactslhec~ad~nmmereoffundswti:h am demanded unde~ hi tm of wdd Deed of TnJst. 4. Anylldadl moneyspsyalaunderllkcxxdract, and not demanded :X8 bythel:~e,-,iafc'-,yt,mderb~ellrstDeedofTnmthm.&k~mlemgllo, uPlom'ad~' mtoteJ emoum of~e unl~cl ~and intenmt on the nole eecured by Deed ofTrust ze r~Y, rdld Deol'/a~m' 22~ 19e3, ie bwtrum 14o. 810 Nt Omclal Reckads ee Riverdale Orani~lmabyaulhoftaeaanddkectsgmdbburaementofNndewhloh 23 amdemardedunde~lhetemmolsaidDaddTrut s¢ s. itbmutuab/unck dadmedWeedbymdbebeesthepertieeheeto th,t the dOM or po, .....:n rand uee of lhe aul31ec~ property by CXly, ir, XudrnO Ihe dght W 35 refTa3mqm Iwld dp of ilTl~vw,.w.I AI. Illel 0c,,.,,/..d upon. ~ it|l:..qt~ (X' lf111 mgreementbyelpmrties. Theemow~twllownklPanmgraphlAincludw~butWnot~ · ,6 11:), TUI I:)eyrMiM Io1' ~ ~Olllelm Illd ~ 6. Grardmimebya0feesandccak--datothediarnimdofaf~' n ~.m~:k e~;t;~nact;onvddchhebeenw'm~beeo--,~-'es:lbYCilYintheBuPedOrCOWt P. 16 & ddlndleve~heCityofanyanddfuremr.~r":r.:mchilmone. ccm~ofgs -c~,~T~Dn of ~he Ixopedy rdened to here~ or en ~ of ~he berlin1, grade, 5 condndon orb p, dFxacl pubic b'~Vm;,.r--,g.'i.. ' 6 8 10 11 14, 15 16 1'/ 19 ,~0 ~-1 S8 maeem hemin oun--':ed. ThieOremmntmeesede enyandd mher Pdoregreemeru andur%..,' ~dir&e, oralorwdbrkinoofw, c~ion~mrewah. Nopmvtdonomakedhereb dd be consinned against 'me ~ eelely beomase It pulpsred this agmenmnt ~ Its /// /// /// PLV:rns .3/2Ngs 3. 9 10 P. 17 1Q. (kmqkx.,tlmkamdQnland:m~-enO:alnlllm'Nt, mhMbebound bY'" II'mp~eml~m'xl oondiGon: c~x~ty"'~ MMq,p,,/,,~'il, Incl mll lhe plnl~W~fio d~Jl be PATiY L,, VALP. NZtJ~.A DON SPAeNOt.b, P,qec:t rab-,.r Dep,r~,a.'d of Pubic Wodgs 15 le, 18 19 21 24 KRPALMPLAZALNII'EDPAATNERSJ41P, AN ILLn~$ LIMITED PART14EfRBHIP P.18 A.RN: Wn:tasm~&l-15 001 and 1521S,2 i}msond kiga..=41i:n tOOl kldi'/~;" 1he legal ,a~;.,loel for maln~ning fis The kaornmtlon krrdahed on this 1ram mef M b~,dk ,,_d to the Feder~ i. gOhway /Idl ~ lfrlpli~'qld by fildlIgy tiffdid i Tdl lkt.~lalkxl P~3iect6 are mqueMed to rrmdatatue, dleebmyormec~cdmnmdon- Pleesec:heekthelknmbdowwhlchbest TM furfishing of lhls ~ Is volunlan/. HeM afHousehold: MeJe Ram: White &medoen !no'ira 61:)e(ify Tribe: Beck spe~c. )_.a,-I -y,t et ld)Aial ses,,rlees i !,, 1~"14' iivialeis 3133 Irk Its'at !S~es'allkl, Ca.TtferaSa 9~44~,,4191 6RANY DXED KI~patlIiqlITmr~F,A~.ANm/PKNIIFIffenPA~ P. 19 ATTACHED QI-Fliv.-15.&I141211 (18216-1) ~ GRANT DEED .- GRANT to the grATE. OF CALIFORNIA, !H that rul pror4, ty in tl~ ~ .e~f yemecul~ County. of RIverside . ~date of Cadfomla, daaf, rlbo~ e~: SEE ATrACH~ ~CRII~I'ION O8-Riv-'i 5,.1~.81-1621 8 (15216-1 ) (Continued) P.21 Imlmmmmlmmmmmlmlmmmmdmm ....... d~kmlmmmmmimmmmemdmmmmmmmmlmmMimmmlmlmmlmemmllmlmlmmmmlmw lbmmmmm k, mm' .d~mmmmmmm~mmmmmmmmmm ........... mm, mmmmmmwmmmmmmmmmmm I~mmmmm~dmmmmm~llmm-lmmmmmmmdmll.INimlelfmmllmmmdlmedmmllmdmlml~mmmmmlm~ emmmmy;,dlm'mdmmmmmmm:bmmlbm'd emm~mmmmlglmmd Omdmlmdm__dmmyd emmmmmemm,mmmme rum,gCJePI ~% - - dlbEDemlml~ mmmmmmmmmmmmm mmmmmmmmmmlm$ ommmmmmmvmmmm~mmmmm Opmmmdmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm mmlmmtmlmm~mmil:t:::m ;? ':_':_-:~:_~1-~:'mNdddmmmmd "' ,m~-mmmmm__.:.~mmmmmammVmmmmm" . mmmmmmam m,m&mMeW~m_ .~I~. kmmmlmlmv mb&mmNm~mmemmdmmmmmmmmmkm'mmm I, emmVlmdim'mmbmmmllmmmldGmm~mm~emmm mmmmmmmmmmmmm 19gllteelE!ly. llmmaimlmdemaimm~mm&ek'mmm;dmmmmekemmBeemmmd~m '/e- ' (Immm~m&mmmetomb Mt")~Bl~,MelmF mmmmmem'llflElik&lm lmmEIm tlm mid lmellm~'dmmmlmml lmlllm mmllib ammll mmil mam~mmi l~- l~/,llmmmmmmylmmml drab, , _da~d limmmmm.,-ml._ . .' .- MMIM,/mmm. M P.pp w~.eol~i4o~e CITYOIII"EIIECI. JI..A k/t ~' 'k tl ~ ' f WkW atW' -'-- ,Ibedasb tL:GINNtNgitthegouthwestexmm'ofeidPBrcell,deolalngePok~ontheEas~dYilne efthit eellain pine of lend ,.,.,...) :d mlhe a of C,fib.,& bydeed recorded July '1~, 19/3 as TheriOe&7p14,16-E. aJong~1e GotdJm~hd eeid PBmd l, lio tminO gW NOdJledY'gne 'dpafoel edeeid Pseet bNo. eN30. edeescedSe.~61eet ThemaN.01e41,0O,E~addmmedgk2Sleet; : Then~ N, O t';~2'O0'..., a dllan~ d ~ loal; Timnee Nofmedy'On aeurve cOncave Wemdy NMng a ramue of 240.00 feet. througn a~ mOf46eGT84',&'lafgleflglho1169.61 feet; ThenceN.17e6e'(X)'W..atletanoeollN. NfeelloakpointoneeldEBetedYgnedPameid lendGon,.yadlolheBtmdCeifomi&deobeingonlheWeeedylneoleldPemdl: Thence ik:KJ~edy along eald gne on a J'en-tan0ant~~ Easledy, havln0a radius 0/200.00 feet, through an alLn01e of 37e12'H', m't arc bngih d 129.89 ieet (the in~bld rscbl nne helm H.56'14'16' W); Thenoe eemman0akmg ead Une e.oFa*erE. aeNtama olal&le leet;' la)0.001eet, thraugh an angle o10e'16'bl', an am lenge d 174.13 1Nt, lD:he PoMt dr'~t,' ," ~- The Nxwe deeatad psmN of and eontains 4S~38.31 :quam Nee (1 .~el acres), n~e at ieee.. / k-C_ WINCHESTER · i P.Z4 ,,, PARCEL cr/'Y ~ T~v~6OULA n/OHT-BF- ~VA Y 'OgOICATION 31J, I ~ 'e.5 12~49 *,j DEEEB TO ERBIMAII purc~mepdoetarensv,_,.sAan*lhebndlmomsAPN:llg)'830'4~ (spmtionc~ FMroel: 1~21e1,2. youerenatmquingltovegeayom'prapedY~~offm~ pfloe hse Uesn msde-;'laf I_ Uf~XL Your dinmime on Ihe OSsr lu PurchMe is. stdo~y for ll~e pumose of THI~ IE NOT A ~ 'to pU!I~HA~E AN n~_m~ll~iT, BUT MERELY AN WHICW 19 ~ TO THE ~ OOUNGILI APPROVAl, Dmcl: PAI~'Y L, V~ Rec:eivedelx}Oy KRpALMPLAZ~~PAR11~r'*1011~, 2I&i2MENI ~ tUSI IIQME2112&TION Pmpmty/~?:e~aRi~n Pold.~ Add 1;/0. Pubio taw ~1-646. me/or Chapmr is of anmmn dSsmo.OO Imm been mmdm~er ee kameene us ~ in your prepeety t~se ,LmgmlDn~dpllbm'). 11-,issmms~bbesedt~xmmqHxtM~N~m~lendbn~lims nmqNmnN Ca=: FAIR uAFe,'rr y,.ALU~ · The delnilion dttlir llllket mll IINDplkm hmln btxeJ"~g.:l in ~eclbn la!8.a~l)dthe Code ~Clvl prooedum of CillOmlm, whk:h bquol~ In pmt m~Ommem: re(s) 'll,efairlnefltstm~Nl)m'o~mtYlmlmn.bNhlgFmmmtlmmSmm~mmmclmdmm of~81usti~l:leXMaM besOmecSmby~hs~kr. being wllingW sell but allmem~gl p~forwhk:h~hepropadykremxmmbly~!mPtmble anclmmamble.' Pm~elol~ ~' I. ANDANDIMPROViMEN~ $-0- ; DAMAOETOTHERBMAJNDBi l-O- TOTAL in r|aftr.,. --=;Iwlhln the,:-:=nabb mreml dlhilowne, hem been~agt~ed LBGAL ~cBCHii%d:~ r., ,,. --,r..l;*,=.,,w itme to ee meJ pmpm~ln lh~ C~ ' OfTe, J::'% County of &'d~z. ek:;, GlaaatOr':;,~i. d,~,~.~:4~ MIolIowE: Page2ol3 3UH eS; '95 lZ=58 DE3:q'. OF BLDG. SE:RV 989-2"/5-4837 P.28 ; : AtlleM~ II · ~ of blunt -"an Brodtwe P,,*IItlN:k~ Yea' Rtghll Under ! Unlorm nel~'~n ~ md Rml Pmlmty -~'~ ...... ,~ IMidm ~ ol 1F/O'. ql'we are ~ ',t---:~ bdng eendudm:l on the 'proptory by ~ Yee NO ownerilin~: Glvenln'mmnaadclrlm:. with informmlon for felocmlon planning. KRpALMPLAZAUIATEDPAJ~, PA'r~"Y L VAI.ENZUELA R..~ Proprot/Agent u Pege3c:d3 Febamy la. I~S Exhibit A .. W.0:~01~,043~ Crry'OeeTEMEMJLAIKRPALMPLAZA .n. mtpadiadofperodlolpai,odMapNo.~4,1omsehownbymaponfibinBookleeot ratcad kkp.. Pap Tth.mOh e eraeel, Faconie ee RNerdde CounW, stm of CamordL bak~g · pa.-cdOdaddPamdMapNckB84,.~ .' .n.mceN.?rt4. e.E. dcmtheeouthedyfaec~eaidpemetl,aieobetngtheNormedyh afseid;~e~lO, adkareeofaO.~Sleetto.b~eFwcintdBeOlm]qolgteeuL.,srAlobedeeefeecl; 'Thmv~ .cxxdmJIng N.7F14.'IB'F-.. akmg sdd h. a cJlsfanca o( E7.79 feet; ThenmN.Oraa~O'F,,aelmaneeeeT. elfead: Thena H.88,EI'4O'W. a ~ of 28.78/em; · Thtraa. O1:"41'00'W., acF, stanoe of 16.001eetlolhe I:dmdBegind~ .. ,The aeove .cm_m.. :d ~ d Isna .~ :s~_ll ~u,,8 tin, (o. oo~ ~). more or · - Milderos Crowed, PL$ No. erE2 3.0 ~4 11 ~ & 145 15ele. e P.31 ,~ Gran~ has eeeulad 8ngl wll deltfer 1o PA'TSY L. VN..ENZUBA, Reel 8 dinled .l~6,~PmgBi:l~q6.~incorfidB.,dJon .ofwl.leht:..mumalyam"eeemfolow~: . or m~lumin. OOd~,j tW'.mM d..d, v,han lle'lo .dd pmpwly'cm"in, ma~vaa,a in dim'alert ofthe CIW', 8re v:_._lab;e. unesls d promre. to Ii'm provli~ of Beclkm 5061 el, 8eq.. ofthe Rmmnue and TexasIon Cede, : Pie .,, aph tA headn, mly ufipakJ tlieeB togelhef wt1 ~ Ool llld kllMu~thorooll, argl Bnybonds ormemsmera~'mlcareilueOntheglmlill~imltkvle~,edm, orPeAss~n isulm bythsCl~,~iJk~W,,-ll~oaoum, Yage I e I - -a..." ~"ls. ortoo~a~'i' ',l~2Haedefnedln'dleC. o..,p.. r,v,j%~EnvJranmenld S Mewponre, C,- .~'. .... %81d LMIbilyMOf1960, ll&,J .ded.,42tJ,,~Ck Slic/ion9~01, d mq.; b I.leamdia "' "k ~-'m it. -,.K, ftd)o~ P.~ 40 UJ.C. Setneon 1901. at m-; the aubetlncel~lllaafdmaweeleelnSecgonZSTITgflheCeggekHedlhand 6 C°dBendln~hemOulelkmeaqstedlnP'l;A"slx°mdgiedPtrmaf~tosddiws' w B. boblgeedhmeundertolndudevdthoul&,ld]r-bendwhmhe fu,,,~ee-"~ or u, Jxewewtrle, d cam oe my required er rvr ...... mpeir, elem-up, d~',ii~dQo~% or ..Ifec~:.' if .dig. of the Ixnxl, and the ix, fly rnXgmaflag~ 8 90l:)lgljonelulj~wdlbpen:dheeboenrwn~e~--4hcmnPhneewithePP~Mbl S. Mymrdm..wMyspmym~eunderWec~Mr.c&upwmd~nWumng btoMmnountefunlxMjxbM:N~endklametmtthenoleeeafmdlWDoodofTmet :I,B rmoarded De .... ~rr22, ~ ,e Inmumont 14o. EIOgOT. ~ ~ cd PJvWBMo '- :IS co.~ 8hdl. upon ck,m,nc[.Ix, nmde~w bbKJtlckP/enlmed ltmrmJrx~,~id ber.Jfi~'* ' T to pradde at mix3nveyan~ II W Psroeb 11~1t2, 8nd tD km'deh Granlor 34 goodendeue.~dmmipeehoedn0e/dmonoys~~bb~de4mems 6rm. norhergbyeutrxxtzeandcllmcxrU'ledblbur~wnofkJndBwhk:h ),6 mde~m;~ledundetthetemmofNidDeedoITrJst- ].? Z8 bylhebendok~/underme~mDeedarTnazhwrwinebovwmlwrrwdW, uPw"nd inGixinO zg re(xx~le(I IM,s_~,1)rr 22. 1~W2~ mm Inwln.mw.I No. ~llWOI, Clkiml Fiecards d Flivmraidm 2o County, ehd, upon denu~be mme peyable to te bendcimY mmed tfere~d~.ekJ ~ eredemunc~l~tt~tmTneafsBidDeedafTrusL 34 6. Itkmutudty, w.d. ex~ciarda0medWandbetweenU'wpertleehen~ ~6 gmt the dgN i)4r-f:y'-illlio~l li'KI UMOfN eLd~JOClt~l:31y C;lY, klGt,ldblg'dle dglll;lo remov9 8rid ~ W inlxov~xJ.~ a cQmmB~e ulan ~w -2~on ar thas 2~ to. Nll peymen~tx'Bucl~/-olwww-:Dnend use- 28 & Qme~or heeeby egreee end GO.K.b tD 1he (liSml. BN of ran,/ Page 2 a£ 4 3 · been or me/ bs ,:-.- g -.-~!ln~x~tlnsuohomeoflodmnslmbYmmonoflhelngof T. Thepee~,&~mbymeCltyofltmolmagdommsdfthlsaOns,,d' dfslevelheCi~ollwlyenddlalierNmlgdms~cldmeonn~nt~the I nalsd,m,~oflhepmpeftyflefildlohilflmefonecommldlhekxadon, Ofmie,(l' · i, UlTnmlM. mll~~o!'ttmpmlimhmmm- 8 ~ll{dmmmmmmdllt~llmiOlll{]{:l~l{kM'll~~PlrHilifidl il~l~,~lmmiee~beslnd ,,~lzf=~desirlldr.i--g/IDdmlpe~lhe 10 ItlilllMIIjlOu. dliJd.'t!'dl ~gi:.md~'T'-Ifl!tllYIIdllOt!lllMOl'lgrl!"~'ll ~ tltl4hk~d'NI. ord of NmNHl~ in ~'i ' "~'ri Ih~...L:',%. NO I)~vI lgr~ 0{wl{Ikw~ 3.1. shah be conslined aqldm{ Ihe CI~ solely bemuse I ~..mi:mr,T-I mira aeme;i.m.n In Its ~e/// xs/// /// ~.i ~6 16 P.3,4 1 · 5 I(R PALM PLAZA UMITED PARTNBRSIg% AN ILUNOI6 LBdITED PART1.4B/ISHIP. B 10 11 14 15 PATSY* L., VAL,ENZLF~ By:. [X:~N SPAIN, iCX.D, Pdndlxd D~*~' b,.. A ~ Pubic W0fks 17 18 ATTEST: Deed: By:. JEFFREY S'TONE 35 ~6 mmlllmllmmt W Cmlkmmlm geeoT-mtme ammmmmmmmlmmmlm'nmmemdmm~lbm ¶B21e -.6RN~wlhe 'Sam or Caafomk'am ;:,%SDdB';T.:fm' drainage pUrpON8 - · · upon, over ~ Boron. din tarrain reel property in .the ... .City of Temecula, County of Riversule "' ,' stare of CaH:fm~ia, d$e~r" :tl am folows: BEE ATTA.C. HED Dr-a~ur,,Cl.N.. . 08-Nv-15-6.61-16216 {1521e-2) (Combrod) ' eemmlmbmdmmemmlmmllmmmmlmmmmmee~ ~mmlk~:, ' ~ 'im emml mlmmm mmmm bmdmmmibmd te ldm mmme mmlmmmeFlmmmem'mmmmmm~,Immmmm'mmmsl smt'mmm . mdlmmmm mmmmmmmmmlmmm~mlmJdmmmmmmmm~lmmel ImmmWlmmimmipelmleewmmembe WfiNgimmVkmmdmmmmlelidmlemd. imme~mmddb,Wmqmmmummmmimeemimr-,emmYmmmmmm ~rA'rE OF CNJR3RIIA OmSlletle____,,deyd ._15__, ijmemmemmmjmmemmmmmml mmmmmm, lmmmrOfimmmm,Le~'dmmWIImltddk~° ImmmmommlV~ " Ommmmmisemeemmllmem,.,,~,elmmmblmmwVeel4beee mtmlmNmmmmmmmmmmm{mi__lmdmm~WlmsMdmmemd-A f 41~dmmedemm Im lJmeeme b Ns~m,M malmdssl -~V 'l~ql rossrely jlMamdljmb l~mMm mlJle Jl~alflM mmllVmmpemlmekdldslmblmmikelmmmeemmWemmmm&emmeuNmmmm .~Mllll~el%llSNtlmmmdlmmlmNiWmmeSeemmmemmb~mm mlmmIM memmm mlmmltl, bemdmm. mNm~me lmemmm mmm mmm mmmemW'mmmmmmmm mm mm mmmmm md'mmm mm emJ~ lJde,.mm=,._dsWef Nm~evbllrm Fenmy 13. 1995 Thallxldj~ofPefel I lilpeollMepNo. i3430 88 ehown by map gn lle in Book188 ol Parcel Mqm, Pap 7 lhrough 9 Itafeol, ReooR!8 of halde County, 8me of Cilfomb, bekg deecdNdukiows: (X)iliNCING atthe Southweetcemer~eald Pawoel 1. dmbehlg(het'- th~astcomm'o~ iaamdgdadidPafodMepNg.~3430~, ~N. TO-14,18"E. akmg~heB(x~thed~hofaeidPamet1, aleobeingNNonhedY~ne hna omtm/~N.TBe14'1rE. dQng Bakl line. adlldahce dLr~.?g feet: Thenee N.meai'~'E., · dkmnee ot 7.e2 lee; Thene~ N.S~21'40'W., a dle4~noe el 26.78 feet; Thence 8.01'41'00'W,, e distan~ of 16.00 ieet to the Point of Beginning. prepmad Under We .. ~:. ,.,,,. ,,,~-.- -~. - P.~8 CITY 8f TK~Cd~A · OP~INA~ BLm-nlNO SERVICES ! Mr. Memdahnsan Prapenyr_nla~j~m Mkz~_~ral~ &emmacaM RE: VdkirJlgjlikrlirid blL.,jtd_ 16 : Pitall: (X)9 and lie17.~ NaN: 910-_ _ _M04X)6 (A PorGon 01) J dudreGis nv&,~-d, (seo aUnt,rod legid del, o,~olb'~ and plat map). ffyau'mmpenyeoce~e~dty~oeer, pkme,dumtheblcM~documerds: Theodgimd amn~Dmd aF*-:~y&Dmd. exaeutedard e) and the ',=,,,,--'nent Agfeefnm't r--a.,A~ IKI 8l~m,imll OfCQ,~inf r~.~ tmlh on meAaqulmNon vm/mallan~anly). FILE COPY · ..~,~ ~~ ,-,,..,...,. ,,.......,.,._. ,,,..','~..,~ Ifyou heveenyqueellone oon~,~~ pieaM tm, dmen~lahoureofBe. m. am!EpJTL PLV:,Jmcl Enc:lmmme: "rlileVI T'd:leVIBurvey · A, cq,.;'a'llon Poltcp/Act of lgr'~) You' Propwry. Your TmrmporlBIion Project NRBORNE ~ NO, · L iiH1l~ NOT~ THIS LETTER lENT VIA NRBORNE [Ae,,eed~ MAIL TO 'J'HE ABOVE MAILING ADDRBSf,. APN:. mO~00ee(mpomma0 . &066 11,125.00 1400.00 IIM. IIIIIIV DIWII~I 1.184.00 G.efT.0O 886,177.00 PAT b-~L. ~/.M k'NZUELA PmaPropmyAOent. rlooatw, a aoalw B'rAZe~MENT DE JUaZ ~.GMEENaATIoN P.44 DMdmTolTiiImlolthof:"2,.i. mydeltCexlosme~ilmloetfJull=omPefMml~elnlrm lees tan the '% r.,~w~'s opinion d ~ msdwl valus ~ hs d~4V..~sS:l a~s s peamid b,lJ:FIJtJOn otymr pmpefty, at wJ'd~lJmo, you iyyow fepmsentafive wefe The/.(k~':rt talamkdocar"' diw, blowi~NyeurFepm~,b Nghe~ nI=FINIT~ 1288,820 0fthe(hde ofCidl Pmcedum of Cagbmk, whioh JoQuoted Jnpeft ee~oBows: · (a) ThebJrlTwket~JueofhpropedyteJ(enlethehigheetPdoeonthe(f~e otvdue!~thd wedd be eOmed to by the adler. Iaing wiing to eel but and ml3uyer, beinO medy, Wlling and able Wbw/but undef no Pamcdw end Page LAI, mAND~ :lll,.~qlxl oo DAMAMTOTHEI~.MMmER $ -0- PeOoBc~O OrdUeb) Thee ere esah.esswe Ixing ~dumd Yes No PA:~Y L V~J_~ki2LJEI_A. PLV:me P. 47 AuOudeQ, Igg4 BXh!bltA (XTYOFTEMB3ULA k'-/-'- 16 IlkiM ~f We, Y''e WthQkt V'--need Tlm lpofiienoflaeroel eolparcel lkkp No. 23,13O as fhown by mep mib in Book188d pamdMepe, pagee Tevough ethereoI. Reeedsee nlveedde Comdy. Btde dC-"~rM/.belng BEONNN0 at the llg th.aiteomereleldd PImd i, debeing mlx;ini esfa EaaledYllne al'l~loedebFemddl~dcu~,L,. ~tothegtdedOelfenbbydeedeeordedJulyl~-.lg'/~ae imeemetlie. BOHO. OIIkiRemedsdeddRJdmkbOOUr~. · 11klrloe K?'Ge14.18"E.~b Nodhedy lne of lekl Plrod g. lJ10N!ftg~ kxXhedy gne ,;/ pama I acid Pam~Mep Ho. 88480, adiane of 3e. iS ket; 'Thems 9.Ne41k)0"W,, e thine el 82.06 feet: .. '~temeGJ)4:,..,.~ ...,adigtarmOofN.71 leeC ~6.Sp10'i1'E~adlelaleofe3.79feet. tompoh'donaeMEastedylkeofiamelof lerldeonveyed lothe BllledMcx'fda. alm lxdngontheWesh.lY-hclsaidPwcelk -" 'TT,e li:xlhMIyakmgsddhonam:ws-lan0eficmvecQn(:aveEadedY. hiMrlgamafaM '1 2QQ.Q0 fNI, V, zxJgh an srgk of lo'o2'ae'. an arQ length of l'10.,e fee 0he b. tmal redlal nne b.am s.,s,l l~r w.). ,,, ee Nn~of k;krano. T!~ie~klfrmdefKll~puq)ot~ofafnHnmsyBr~lth~gmt~orh~mbyr/N~d rdrqdehee to 'the ginNee Irantofer, l,Yll%.f ~g~,lnandlosakllmewBy. P · 49 Frolace 'WDI:HgITIR&I-lS Pmml: OOO Apt mO4,JOOt, O(apodion~ 'f 8 9 11 11 14 15 17 18 (banBur Iron, ,,t,'- ' and wil deliver to PATaY L V~ Red Deedddsd .'lgg~,lf il/k~PemelO0t'APN910~00,OOO (apadlmd),incarV~lwrdonat~mlimmmu~y~mtollow~ vmle m ~ 'line s~l dsw ~1 el lem, mebnL ::n, ;iv ,._.mq Imsm (,...u, JeJ or la=._aaA'la'), end 1mere eraapt dime ~ end .... ,.tb vlhJch. in the sgie ·" :. li,a,A~l of the CIty, awe 11~repl ~IL .. B. Handle red lainperry laxel, IDO~dl, .and mew:f:,~lb in the ':' : ~. All ml proptony mm a be i:awa'-'i. paid, and ~' .. ,clledpureue, nttotheprovielcmsoiSecian=-e~-leLmaq-,dlheRevm'i'zeandTilcmlk:m .-' Code. .... I~'IIE. f% lA i.,eein. any l~aidtelaetogether,idlhpl"~lklOltli'glifltereetb'leflOrk :' md arty bonds oraar,~r,~,,;,d~gad are due oflb dlellleieblnMee'red lo, or p0lleseinn is laken by b CIty, v, lzt.;verirst ex~zm. !- A. rxlw_,,nUy, deknd, Fe:dece, and hokS Cay . Ib dncas. )ldl'~l:Jllel: ~ IU~U lllgJlh Ifld Illigll 'flee Ind L' i111111 111cIII ll'KI lige]rilt rely Ifld byeabet (e) the pmaence in. on. within, unde. or eboul lhe lamei /agel~3 ~.A,--,,A~i"P.;.3pm"%Cr,,f.A" ~n, and lbbiXM~lg60, ea 8ectxl~,etamq-:bl~- dmaU '- ~-' T,_,F ! '-nAeL4OU.B.C..Beclkln1801. eteeq.;lla Rmmm~Om--r- ~.,and11&,tv~-N~,l U.5.O. 6ecien88Orl. eleeq;and thee ' "" ' 8ndBiklyCodeorlllzldoullf."Jk/,r, el inBeogon26316oflMCikeli!'kleNlend .live. ,;, B. boedgeaedhereufuMl~buide, wahoutkdtado~andwhehw b-mwgv~le w t..dA,~:mV~l;. d ,ooeW of any required ~ a:3emW'eU:cl repair, clemn.up, 8 ,:lui.~k~ ~r de-~mam,.~-- "',nef e~e lanxi, and the ;,.~,_ dl;.~ and Implwmemdia g OI3ggldiondldlOofl~lalalllgle!:mrlxihlwbwenrenclwredlni~piia~wlth'T~ll~R~Ye 10 federal, ease. ~ local laws, eatuSe, wtl~,a,~cwm, qulalkx~ and rules. ).~ agfeefnentbyallpmlJwt. 'r~wnmadd~kaF'ag"'Ph!Ak"Idm'butbn°ttnlted 1~ fl. dl payment fix' Iuch (.. r~f, imt B~:C~ ard abe. 4. Granlor her. by m0rees and r.~w~"Ae to ew cl]erninel of eny 25 oondrmv~.lk,,.~adlonwhichhubmnormmylxcommenoedbY'Cil¥ InhBuperiorCouft cd'Nveak:~Gota~bcofde..m'~&dd land. Indvedv~anyBnd dolatrdall) moneyffuitha8 · s6 beenornaybedq,o-bvlincomthmue:homoooftodemaOesbYmeeonofVTaiUinge Z'7 suc~at:tm~ so oorwtmoUonoflhepropoeedlxd:loknPrown~ 7. Thil;agmementisl~resultof.z~e~t~~m'dbs 33 inlmldedbylheparllee~:~belifirmlexpreealmoflheirwvl'alAn~algw~reBPeCttDlhl :84 ;hefu~vudl Y.,d Thle. egramad:e..,:,,M,c.-bsm'e/amdadfmhrpb~m anti and d:mr.J;.aW~i. a3nna:lb~U'A'd. WilJ.. Noprovbion~rdainedhefeln S5 Malbecm-,Wuedagdn.te~l:~ysaldybecauselPreParathleagreemenlinim · 6 I/i //I :e Psge 2 of 3 :).. Joinlly lnd Nvera!ly bbbthemundec. n 8 PAi~Y' L VAI..clT, DJEI..A 8. lamatot, Its auaignsandsw~mm:__ksinSen~shdbe. bomdbyd and w....k.-- ,::6.'d t~w:i in eds agrav llwnl, mdd 'the i:adi~mem~ shell be Deepmbnm1:oi'Pt,ti~Worka 3,.4, 3,6 A17fGT: :L6 CITY C(XJIqC31. ~0 ei ~6 'eege3c~3 13:8 DEPT. OF'BLDG. MERVY re, A cALeomBA CORPORATIn:X4 a oorpormion orgamcl End existing under and by virtue of the IBM ef 1he State err Cmli/~mla ; am h.orelly GRANT Io the STATE' OF CALIFORNIA 811 that roll property in the .CIw of Teemeula . County of Riverslee , Slaw Of Call~oml8, · de~erlbed as: SEE AT'rACHED DE~UrrlON 084fly-1 B-6.60-15217 '( 15217-1 ) (Continued) Idllmmmmml~ iil~tlmmllelmeWW~lmmlmmmlwlNeN Immmmm, ttdma._,.,?mp. dm.d - ~ m~m~qlim~lme dmQ, d ~m__.llmwmmmm. ' ilmmm,.IWmmQ~.,'Jmee~ee. lmmmmm4'iqdmm' ikmwmmdmlm/mmammmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm .INiml~llWlmV,'l%mmmmmmmmmm{mlmmmml. mmmmmlmmm'mmdtmmmqkdm~m~mmmmmdl' ;m""'m dmmmm~mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm ml'l~lql, lmmmmlme mmmmmmm j '~ ~ - :-:- mmmd m~bmmmmmdimmm,imlim dmmml m&d*mmmm~m. mmmm mmmmmm m ill~/,Immmmlmmmmmmmllm~'lmmml .mmmmmim~mmt 11mlxxlkxaof parCelgel plfcel ldap No..fi430es shown bYmaPmxfib in Bo°k lgB°f pamd Mape. pegee TeexsOh eareof, memee of mverdde OeantY, mmof Cemem. tx'~ da,k:dlxufesfcdm: BEGINNNGlt~toNmt~weltcomerdsaiPaeodO, aJmbeJngtPointonthe~~ , d~hlee~,/tFerc~dlandeonveysdmtheSlatadC*r'.' .,TabydeedreooTdedJulY12.1g73as ' Thorme 8.01 0d, l'OO'W.. a dbdm'~ d 8P..06 fe¢' Theme 9.06'55'00'E., a didmira d 88.71 feet 'TTan~ 9.1f10'51'F.. a dldanoo d 63.7g I~et, to a Ix~ t:n aid EB~t~dy' line of lame[ d laBd ~...,f~sd Iolhe 8tare ~iomla, 81so lxlng enllte wBeed,/iine d Mid Pand 8; · . Theme NmVndyakmgeaklDmamm4anOedcumcocaveEamdY. heWearadlus°f ~ abov~ dee _d' v f pamsl d mr, laim,.~OSrkOO equam bet {O.O/O m), more · n.aamgme is madolin'the puq:eee de fmeweyand mgmmorh~mb~ ~mm and mUnquishas to the grantee al~ and all a~uttefe dghle, Ineudlng accen fJgNS. appurtenant t.o J, F, DAVIDSON ASSOCtATES. Pmle~ WiNCHES'~R&I'15 C":'i'O/~t paroet: 15~!7 Ot~ ~,~ ~ m0'~o4y~(APOA'TTON pad te~17'2: rdX)./geq. tt. ~,$10.OOpersq.~X2S'~ ' oe eo OFFER TOV~ 18 9I.iBJ,ECT TO THB BY:'pA'i',BY L. P.57 lenanee thed4,,t-,~': lir,kelJulleom.peOlmkn- i..gNd. DEBbdrllON: Pt-,,, ,.i,'d.~v ,~e lllelDtlqereelpqedy'lnTHECflY e, *°, , UdlmmRttoOfm~tA d ltm'v~&'~Rmmd~A~F'~'-Nm~1)A~t°flff' MERWN'$, A GALIF~ COLORATION p. m.,VALS,mz:Um=LA 12)lmge~o(~l Fdxtlqr 1~. t~ ThetpodionolparodeofparceIMaplkL23480asehOwnWmN}enmelnBo°kleSd pErcad Maps. Page 7 Duough e 1hereof, Reoord; of nkemkle County. 8Me of Camorals. IHdng dfa~xlmki:,m: C(:NdMENCNG efthe ~comer d Mid Pemel 9, aJeo bek~g .pamdld~klPerodMIl~k~k1~ Thehoe N.7e'14'l B'F- along the Nelhedy erie d nkf Pecel ofeeTd leered l:adk4eabedSO.~6feettoN pd,lt~igbvegdthe eala ,. e ab~bedaa:~X,d:. Thorice eontMutng N.T6*14'18'E. dmlg 8ekl be, a didsee ~127,~9 feet; 'Tl-,ee&01*aB'2O'W.,atbtance.da~--38ke~ Therim N.88'~'40'W. · determe el 2e.8o feel; · rhenc~ N-Ole41~O~E*.'ed~8hoed ¶~00~ ~ d ~ P.61 01'~k~ J.F. DAVIDDON A,BSOCIA'I"B8. ~ ....~. ,p'o,~s,e ~ ' ~ CrY, PLB Ha. 616~ ,° · JllO=,pJpZk~q]l 'Y'~" "V' 'uema~ A PARC-EL J · \. ; : \ " PARCEL O .... . . - ,. ., . e· R 4 lgWi7-,i P,63 ,e M hi _ =__ted end wig driver to PATSY L VN.BHZL,8-A. RmsJ .' propedyAgemt~rlhe ClY orlo tho dlmignsjd mcompeny, an ibsen'mnt Deed '-. dated .lOOS. identliyingPmedlglY,.i/APM9'tO "M)O 009 ; blaming ITIWaaf:- !~. 1. ABfmd pmpm~tmm fimfd be promted, pdd, end 3.6 cayelscl pumuamlobprmblmaof6ec~on6081et. seq..ofm WevenueandTaxdDn 17 Cade. L 18 i. QtyieauthoftmdWpeyimmthesnountdw, wnin Pmmgfa~'tA hemin, eny unlNdd tmaelogeerdim psaltlee, coet end Inm'ee~thenm~ 80 18MimmWhClty,~lmoccts~ .: iS ~NX,;_eOO, end IflJt:le kmumrne ie desired by City, the ~ dinraged timtrek-,. '. e4 i Imienv~.dekd, fweM, ct, smdhaldCIty. iMoWscerm. mllrll)YeS;. H Ilah'-I:-~penddes, fodekare~loesee, ot~ ~l:"e, lncks:inOwiglOutlfl~~ll~-~ ,9~ (a) the Fees'~cm in. on. will~n, unde', er ebe4at the pemel of beau'dora ,~'1, substances, or rw,,-~loue m,sbsms's:es. ea a result of ~srdor's uee, sireage, s gensutlon ~f euch ,,die ....of submancee or {b) Grinlots Idlure to ~8 or{ooeJlawembltlngtoeuchnMalmdab;or-""'st'~csl- F~e'thepufpoaeofUmbl~p'~.Lns Page 1 o~' 3 e lo mm %,1 i nli,,smmse, ix,...: w~ tn. end Limbg~M of1980. manmncled, 42 UIO. SacCon ee01. ~ etmeq.;m F d~de M ' ~ %, T,.v, pu. lad~Act,,le tLO.~.Oeclion le01. etNq.;me Fleeotm~e(:;o~afd Recowny Act. 42 UIC. 8eceon ego1, aim.; and ttmse 4, mudllaumm~m hmdousmaslw bl Secllon25117ollheC"'~c-,," Mend :1 m' Im,:m,'~:'-"- m-unfarr-z ....% d cram cA'el required or nmamulr'.a mmlr. tiecup. !lvltme dglW off-ow,wr l.~end uae ol lm eubJmlmmlmefiyl~Clty, bmcludlng lm dghno rm and ~ielxm of inl~_,~m.1. tomb mine upon mhe e,,F,,alm re'role :L3 eg;,.~lmo,l~l}ydl palnlm. hemoml:dmmminPemgrmph lAk~k-Jm~.butis notgnrdted m, lull ImFmmloreum ;.u~ie,lan ms uw. .. , ~4 6. "time W.e k,,,,a me City of jim obigaliom ruder this 19 --~Ys, llk, n c:d' the I:l, fopedy fetelind 'k:) heroin or on msmJf'd: of the Iocadion. gintie, or 20 conslr___,~ af b pmuZ_-c:s m cl publ~ iml~ 24 n~hemln~o, dalnc:LTlm{ee0reenmm4memedeemrm/enddlotherPfl°ri8rsanwr'ls end uMemanclb~e, cwd m'wdmn, In mmr_e~lan ILlr_~4k%. No pmbion cofimin~ herein B6 elmallxcxm81njedmgBklilheCItyecldybmeltPmPeredt~dBegmemenl~nts _m_ ,e~- tmu. "~/// !11 & Gill'IX. Ill tillgrit end IVOQHIO.i In ~ Ihll be botJ~ by d eatermen cardmom oonmimd In ml. aU't,,.~,am, and tme partm themto dWl be .i 4 6 8 9 3,0 3.1. :1.9 ~J. J~J~ o6 ElF' PATBY I.. V~ Deparb,r..d of Publo WofU 38 Page 3 o:' 3 ll~meN~Cml~ommmm mmm~mm BASBMBI'r OBg) CORPORATION U~, A P..AUR FINIA CIORPORA'rI~IM 162.17 .t3~%md',8~ Io' 1he ~ of CmXforrdm Iron EASEMB~rT for dadmintage purlmommm upon, ~ver and moss That- r../nain mad property in the city d deeedl~daefolDwe: .... "' .E'An'ACHED 08-Riv-16-6.60-16217 416217-2) (Comjm~cl) P. 67 ~.,,0,.-.-,- } oaktim , dWd' le__.'lNdmmi, PBIIONALJ~J_.-I& 3imv-.~ f'-; P.6B WJO, 901224O-O2 CITYOFTEMECULAIMERVYIf8 :,redage :=Fn--a 4 That podlm d Pared 9 d Parcel Map No. ~343~'-shown by map ~n~le laBtrait lee of Paad MaI& Paps 7 hough g lhem~l', Re~0NI el Rlven4de C4unty,, Sine of Cal~rnlk ]xlng deae.;lxxf ae logowe: .Plge114~sakl Parat Miip No. 2343~ Tilefloe N. TP14'l$"E. along P~e Nm'thedy' h ol todd Parat 9, also being h Southerly line oleejdpamell;'s~lemn0eof3O.26fatWthePointelhginnl~dtheeeeeeantW~~ Theme oonUntdng N.7FI4'lB'E, long eelcl fine, a esterme of Thehoe 8,01'38'l~'W, · dbtanoe d E2,3e feet; Thence tL88*'Zl'40'W., a distance d 26.80kaek Tlafme N.01 '41'00'E., · distance of 15.00 feet t; the Point of Begbdr~ 'The: abram dOemlbe pamel et land oontaine 600.70 sqtmm feet 03.011 aofee), nmm or iet, g L4' J.F. DAVIDNON ~TEB,,: · ~~~ Prolured UndeJ' 'the Gupefflon . ' Madse. Crowliar, PLS ~ 6'152 ** 3Ut'l E 'cJ5 13;~7' DE3:rT, Or B,.DG, SERV cJ~9-~ P.69 PARCEL J ~ :' .., . APPENDIX "B" r:.~gdfpt~96%0613~winchllS.prolajp NOTICm OF armawTM2 NOTICE OF HF~RING ~IN6 TH~ INTENTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECUL&, A 6ENERXL LXM CITY, TO ~DOPT A RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY FOR TH~ ACQUISITION OF CERTJd:N INTERESTS IN AND TO CERT,sJ.N RF, XL PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE CITY OF TEMECULk, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE~ STATE OF CALIFORND. KIt PALM PLAZA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, an: ILLINOIS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1230.010 st. seq., that the City Council of the City of Temecula intends to consider the adoption of a Resolution of Necessity for acquisition by eminent domain of certain real property, for public street and freeway purposes end all uses appurtenant thereto, designated as wPercel Bw. Percel B is described on Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. The hearing will be held on June 13, 1995, at 7:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the City Council can hear said matter, at the CounCil Chambers, located at 43174 Business Perk Drive, Temecula, California 92590. NOTICE OF 'r~~ Page 2 You as a person claiming or having an interest in and to Parcel B and era hereby notified that you have the right to appear and be heard on the issues to be considered at that hearing. The issues. which will be considered, are as follows: 1. Whether or not the public interest and necessity require the Project; Whether or not the Project is planned or located in the manner that will be most compatible with the 9teatest public good and the least private inJur~; Whether or not the Property sought to be acquired is necessar~ for the Project; and Whether or not the offer required by Government Code Section 7267.2 has been made to the owner or owners of record. If you wish to be heard at this hearing, you MUST FILE A WRITTENREQUEST, indicating your intent to appear'andbeheard, within fifteen (15) days of the mailing of this notice by filing or delivering thatwritten request to the City Clerk, 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California 92590~ telephone (909) 694-1989. NOTICE OF INTENT, Page 3 You may use the enclosure for the purpose of notifying the City of your intent and desire to be heard. Yo,,~ ~A.4 3,,re to t4me3v f41e ~ w~.4tten request to ~pDe~ ~n~ ~e heard may res,,3t 4n ~ w~4ve~ o~ yo,,~' rJaht to he For further information, contact the City Clerk's Office at City Hall at (909) 694-1989. City Clerk NOTICE OF INTENT, Page 4 RFaUEST TO BE HEARD ON RESOLIITION OF NECESSITY FOR THE ACQUISITION OF .CERTAIN INTERESTS IN REAL PROPERTY. Name Telephone -' Address Date Signature NOTX~ OF NOTIC~ OF ~6 ~IN6 TH~ INTENTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TH~ CITY OF TEMECUI~, ~ 6DFEI:t~ LAW CITY, TO ~DOPT A RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY FOR THE ACQUISITION OF CERT~.N INTERESTS IN ~ TO CERTAIN RFA5 PROPERTY LOCXTED IN THE CITY OF TEI~CUI~, COUNTY OF I~tl'VERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA MERVYW ' S, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION ' YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1230.010 st. esq., that the City Council of the City of Temecula intends to consider the adoption of a Resolution of Necessity for acquisition by eminent domain of certain real proper~y, for public street end freeway purposes and all uses appurtenent 'thereto, designated aS uParcel A*. Percel A is described on Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. The hearing will be held on June 13, 199S, at 7:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the City Council can hear said matter, at the Council Chambers, located at 43174 Business Perk Drive, Temecula, California 92590. You as a person claiming or having an interest in and to Percel A and ere hereby notified that you have the right to NOTICE OF INTENT, Page 2 appear and be heard on the issues to be considered at that hearing. The issues which will be considered, are as follows: Whether or not the public interest and necessity require the ProJect; 0 Whether or not the Project is planned or located in the manner that will be most compatibleWith the greatest public good and the least private injury; Whether or not the Property sought to be acquired is necessary for the Project; and Whether or not the offer required by Government Code Section 7267.2 has been made to the owner or owners of record. If you wish to be heard at this hearing, you MUST FILE A WRITTENREQUEST, indicating your intent to appear and be heard, within fifteen (15) days of the mailing of this notice by filing or deliyering'that written request to the City Clerk, 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California 92590; telephone (909) 694-1989· Ja0~120776.2 NOTICE OF INTENT, Page 3 You my usa the enclosure for the purpose o~ notifying the C~ty of your ~ntent and des~re to be heard. Yo~ fm4 3~,re to t4melv f41e m w~4tten re~,est to roD-era, mn~ ~e he~-d ~y res,,3t 4n a v~4ver o~ vo,~r r.4ght to ~e hear~. For further information, contact the City Cletk's Office at City Hall at (909) 694-1989. City Clerk NOTICE OF INTENT, Page 4 REQUEST TO BE HEARD ON RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY FOR THE ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN INTERFaTS IN REAL PROPERTY. Telephone Address Date Signature APPENDIX "C" z':.~gclq~95~0613%wind~l 15.1xo/llp APPRATSAT. SUMMARY PARCEL 1 Project: Winchester Road/Interstate 15 Interchange Improvements Project Location: City of Temecula, County of Riverside Assessor's Parcel No.: 910-300-009 (Formerly: 910-130-044)- Date of Valuation: January 23, 1995 Owner: Mervyn's, a California corporation Property Description: See Exhibit A Zoning: CPS Zone Present Use: Regional Shopping Center Highest and Best Use: Regional Shopping Center Total Property Area: square feet 0.070 acres; Parcel A consists of 3,055 LAX'I: 120887.1 . ' 3 ' -- ~ Public Use: thereto. Public Street purposes, and all uses appurtenant Summary of Just Compensation: The market value of the property being acquired is based upon a market value appraisal prepared in accordance with accepted appraisal procedures. The valuation of your property has been based upon an analysie of recent sales of. similar properties in the immediate area." The appraiser has given full and careful consideration to the highest and best use for development of the property and to all features inherent in your property affecting its market value. Total Value: $39,177.00 This summary of the basis of the amount offered as just compensa- tion is presented in compliance with applicable laws and has been derived from a formal appraisal prepared by an independent fee appraiser. APPRATS/~T. SUMwaRY PARCEL A Project: Winchester Road/Interstate 15 Interchange Improvements Project Location: City of Temecula, County of Riverside Assessor'8 Parcel No.: 910-300-001 (Formerly: 910-130-036) Date of ValUation: January 23, 1995 Owner: KR PALM PLAZA LIMITED 'PARTNERSHIP, an Partnership Property Description: See Exhibit A Illinois Limited Zoning: CC, Community Commercial Present Use: Regional Shopping Center Highest and Best Use: Total Property Area: square feet Regional Shopping Center 14.38 acres; Parcel B consists of 46,236 LAX2: 120939. Public Use: thereto. Public Street purposes, and all uses appurtenant Summary of Just Compensation: The market value of the property being acquired is based upon a market value appraisal prepared in accordance with accepted appraisal procedures. The valuation of your property has been based upon an analysis of recent sales of. similar properties in the immediate area." The appraiser has given full and careful consideration to the highest and best use for development of the property and to all features inherent in your property affecting its market value. Total Value: $411,481.00 This summary of the basis of the amount offered as just compensa- tion is presented in compliance with applicable laws and has been derived from a formal appraisal prepared by an independent fee appraiser. LAX2:120939.1 .-4- August30,1994 PARCEL A CITY OF TEMECULA Interstate 15 Right-of-Way at Winchester Road W.O. 9012240-02 That portion of Parcel 9 of Parcel Map No. 23430 as shown by map on file in Book 168 of Parcel Maps, Pages 7 through 9 thereof, Records of Riverside County, State of California, being described as follows: BEGINNING at the Northwest comer of said Parcel 9, also being a point on the Easterly line of that certain parcel of land conveyed to the State of California by deed recorded July 12, 1973 as Instrument No] 90990, Official Records of said Riverside County; Thence N.76°14'18'E. along the Northerly line of said Parcel 9, also being the Southerly line of Parcel I of said Parcel Map No. 23430, a distance of 39.25 feet; Thence S.01 °41 '00'W., a distance of 62.05 feet; Thence S.06°55'00'E., a distance of 86.71 feet; Thence S.19~10'51'E., a distance of 63.79 feet, to a point on said Easterly line of parcel of land conveyed to the State of California, also being on the Westerly line of said Parcel 9; Thence Northerly along said line on a non-tangent curve concave Easterly, having a radius of 1200.00 feet, through an angle of 10°02'59·, an arc length of 210.48 feet (the initial radial line bears S.66°11 '19' W.), to the Point of Beginning. The above describe8 parcel of contains 3,055.00 square feet (0.070 acres), more or less. This conveyance is made for the purpose of a freeway and the grantor hereby releases and relinquishes to the grantee any and all abutter's rights, including access rights, appurtenant to grantor's remaining property, in and to said freeway. EXHIBIT A THIS PLAT IS SOLELY AN AJD IN L~..A,.. IN THE ATTACHED OOCUIIENT. OESCRI~DON THEREIN. I e 'HE PARCc~.(S) DESCRIBED IT IS NO l A PART OF THE WRITTEN k,,.._¢,_. WINCHE~S TER F'AHCEL J M. oT'g;'O0 ~=. _ ,=o/lIT oP 866e'MN/H6 CROWflIER i~. 6152 / PRc"PARED UNDER TH~ SUP~fl~SION Or: ,4z , / ?ARC EL ~ ClIOITHI~ P(.$ S153 (ez~ 3-31-98) ~HDso~ ASSOC~rL~S. IVC, ,,o 9o-tZZ40-aZ I r.r. ~O/2'Z40(P) NoTE INOtCATE,,e ACCESS trt~tl TS 9 CITY OF TEMECULA t~I6HT- OF" kVA Y DEDICATION EXHIBIT B PARCEL B August30,1994 CITY OF TEMECULA Interstate 15 Right-of-Way at Winchester Road W.O. 9012240-02 That portion of Parcel I of Parcel Map No. 23430 as shown by map on file in Book 168 of Parcel Maps, Pages 7 through 9 thereof. Records of Riverside County, State of California, being describedas follows: BEGINNING at the Southwest comer of said Parcel 1, also being a point on the Easterly line of that certain parcel of land conveyed to the State of California by deed recorded July 12, 1973 as Instrument No: 90990, Official Records of said Riverside County;, .' Thence N.76°14'18'E. along the Southerly line of said Parcel i, also being the Northerly line of Parcel 9 of said Parcel Map No. 23430. a distance of 39.25 feet; Thence N.01 °41 '00'E., a distance of 99.23 feet; Thence N.07°22'00'E., a distance of 89.56 feet; .-: Thence N.04°06'07'E., a distance of 139.27 feet; Thence Northerly on a curve concave Westerly having a radius of 240.00 feet, through an angle of 45°57'34·, an arc length of 192.51 feet; Thence N.17°56'00'W., a distance of 104.04 feet to a point on said Easterly line of parcel of land conveyed to the State of California, also being on the Westerly line of said Parcel 1; Thence Southerly along said line on a non-tangent curve concave Easterly, having a radius of 200.00 feet, through an angle of 37012'35', an arc length of 129.89 feet (the initial radial line bears N.58°14:16" W); Thence continuing along said line S.05°26'51 'E., a distance of 318.19 feet; Thence continuing along said line Southerly on a curve concave Easterly, having a radius of 1200.00 feet, through an angle of 08°18'51-, an arc length of 174.13 feet, to the Point of Beginning. less. The above described parcel of land contains 46.236.35 square feet (1.061 acres), more or EXHIBIT A PARCEL B (cont.) This conveyance is made for the purpose of a freeway, and the grantor hereby releases and relinquishes to the g.rantee any and all abutter's rights, including access rights, appurtenant to grantors remaining property, in and to said freeway. RLS:rnc,'yb ieg:leg-ib9 %,OFC6A~,,Y Date: ~'- ~20 -- c~ + THIdc PLAT IS SOLELY AN AiD IN LOC..AT, IN THE' ATTK, HEO OOCUUENT. DESCRIPTION THE'REIN. / I / / THE P,~RCEL(S) DESCRIBED IT IS NOT A PARr OF THE WRITTEN WINCHESTER N. O7'2Z'0O ~ ~\7 ~c I or I o~: AU6, Bo. !~4. ROAD~,d~v~r"' f PARCEL -J IND~CATe3 ACCESS ,~/6H TS PARCEL"9 CITY OF, TEMECULA .U..~e=S4 ~ PLS SIS3 (ez.m J-Jm-9,9} D4TE' wo 90-tZZ~O-og I r.z. ~O/2g40(P) nIGHT-OF' YtA Y NED/CA T/ON EXHIBIT B ITEM 18 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council City Clerk June 13, 1995 Planning Commission Appointments APPROV/~x. CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFI CITY MANAGER~ RECOMMENDATION: Planning Commission. Appoint two members to serve · full three-year term on the BACKGROUND: The expiring term of Commissioner Billie Blair end Commissioner Steve Ford was advertised in accordance with the Council's adopted policy and procedure for making appointments and re-appointments. The applications received were forwarded to Councilmember Mu~oz and Councilmember Parks for a recommendation. Their recommendations are as follows: Councilmember Muf~oz recommends the appointment of Billie Blair and Steve Ford. Councilmember Parks recommends the appointment of Steve Ford and Joan Sparkman. Attached are copies of the applications which were received by the filing deadline of May 25, 1995. ATTACHMENTS: Copies of Applications for Appointment ORGANIZATIONS TO WHICH YOU BELONG: II~ol,..i.~wl,, tBd~ e~.mmmltT. It,.,sde_stzldlJmtenlferadlkdo-,,.:lNcmonlhisfonnnmYbevedlbd. Igf,,,.we iltolhe be kept on fie fro' ee_alf ! 4 1 netum te:Clty aml(s Oh, 4317 lit Skill MDIIvi, TMnea, CA I2390-r/14)194- RRRTRR TO RRRVR ON PTuXliNTIIG CO)IMTRRTON I consider myself fortunate to have lived and worked in the Temecula area since 1986. It was the balance between quality of life and employment opportunities which initially attracted me and my family to this area. Currently there is an apparent split among the citizens on how our city should;row or if it should ~row at all. I believe in quality development as both an economic stimulus and opportunity for quality employment. I define quality development as a property owners ability to seek the highest and best use of their property while respecting the characteristics of the natural surroundings, the City's General... Plan, and needs of the community. Within the ..framework of this definition I also believe in a project proponent providing the necessary infrastructure required to adequately service the proposed project and minimize negative impacts to the community. I define quality employment as long term job opportunities which allow employees to improve their economic status based upon individual ability and performance. Currently I am serving as a Community Service District Commissioner. Although I enjoy serving on the CSD Commission, I would look forward to the challenges of serving as a Planning Commissioner. OU~T.TFTCA~TONR q'O RRRVR ON PT~NNTNC ~RRTON My professional background, centered around civil engineering, ranges from experience as a County Civil Engineer, to Director of Engineering in a consulting firm, to Project Manager in a land development company. Currently I am providing consulting services on a self-employed basis. As previously indicated, I am currently serving as a CSD Commissioner. As a CSD Commissioner I believe I have gained additional experience which would allow me to enhance my professional experiences in serving as a Planning Commissioner. Based upon my professional and CSD Commissioner experiences, ~ believe I can offer an informed unbiased perspective to the Planning Commission. I have the ability to contribute from both an informed citizen's perspective and technical perspective. Serving on the Planning Commission would allow me to apply my practical experience in the review of proposed projects as a contribution to the future development of the City. It is in this spirit I submit this application for consideration of appointment. APPUCATION FOR ~INTMENT TO BOARDS, COW e z earl AND coMertrEE OR COMMSeO~ON eaCH YOU S TH~.~ SE~ BOAeD, Wi ~ ..., ,. RESID tk ,- UST ANY RIVERSIDE COUNTY OR OTHER CITY BOARD, COMMITTEE OR COMMi~IION ON BRIEFLY STATE WHY YOU WISH TO SERVE ON THIS BOARD OR COMMISSION, AND WHY lunde~'sl dlhatalTy'eflgkdG.,,,atkx'ionedsfonnmeybendfied. Imtotherelemeeofdde i':fc,,.,.,akhl for Ixdtcity puflxaes. . . Return to: City Clerk's Offka 7 Business Peflt Ddve, Te.,;e:,de, CA 92390 1714) 894-1989 2/Ieme/COM-001 EDUCATIONAL AND EXPERIENTIAL RESUME OF JOHN J. JOHNSON FAMILY: W'~e, Mavis, married25 years Daughter, Jenea, age 20 Son, Reed, age 18 EDUCATION: B.S~ Marketing and Economics University of Arizona, 1968 Graduate Degree American Management Association Management Internship Program, 1969 REAL ESTATE EXPERIENCE: Robert A. McNeil Corporation Apartment Synclication 1969-1971 Kaiser - Aetna Project Manager, Kancho California Land Development - Marketing 1972-1976 Independent Broker/Developer Developed and sold to varied agricultural And rural land in Southwest Riverside County. 1976-1981 Ran con Broker Associate 1982-Present Brokering acquiring and developing varied developmental projects rang4.'ng from residential, commercial to industrial. (Leading development and industrial land broker on the Rancon staff for the past several years.) iOAM), '~ OR COIIRIIIIOII ON WHICH YOU WISH TO lJ~/j: NAME: J~l~e G. B~a~r 'ADDRIll:/+I?~:1 .Via Sierra Tenec,xla 90g-880-5616' 909-880- 5603 i ~ J PHONE: C=14forn~, ST. aCe U,iversi:v B.S. Degree. HanaSement -:... H.S. C:linica,l Peyc.bo/oS? .~.A. Administration (EducatiOnal) Ph.D. Administration, Psycholo.gy UST ANY RW~RIIDE COUNTY OR OTHEI CITY BOARD, COMMiIT21 OR COMMWGION ON WHICH YOU HAVE SERVED AND THE YEAR OF IEII~C2: Pla'nnin8 [ommiss.ion: June, 1990 - present ORGAMZA~ONgTOWTgCH YOU IELONO:k,tA~smiond.[.-h,.~:( c,~b.~lty. sendGel: American .Planning Associa~ion,National'Assoc. of Professors of Educ. B~JEFLY STATE WHY YOU~H~"~E~"'~&"~^~JID O~ COMliBSION, AND WHY YOU IEUMYOU ARE GUAUF~DFORTHEFO21'~ON. BE IPECiqClUamfdMomdpepe I have been active in p~o~essional planning.acti. v~t~es uhrough most of my career, including holdlEE planning positions and paruicipstin2 vi~h plannin~ commissions and other civic bodies. During my years.on plannin8 commission,' I'believe tha= we have made good progress in essurin8 Temecula's.'.~'6~.e.~ as a. vi=al,' in=eresEin2 and well-planned ci~.y. Itk~e al,.:dlhatanymdl Mk,,,~lk,.anlMsfonnneybevedlled. leeneemlolhefdeaeeefede kifoi~i~al~ ~/m' pulJktW IxJqxmes. ORGANIZATIONS TO WHICH YOU BELONG: (l%Grwwsreeal, ta~h.~km', acmmmnlty, sanded: - '-~- Temecula Board of Realtors Member 1988-present; . . . Government Awareness Committee, Chairman 1993-present (see att~' BRIEFLY STATE WHY YOU WiSH TO SERVE ON THIS BOA.qD OR COmBSION, AND WHY You BEUEVE YOU ARE OUAUFED FOR THE FOSmON. U SPECIfiC ~ ., ~.di 0.Fe( ·economically and professionally-, Z .feel .It .'is-time to back to the conunity. I .feel 'that my background as an engineer~.~ and currently as an area realtor best qualifies me to be a technical, community and servc'~organizations:' xuch of my,~i~,~;~:~:~'' Ikrtumto: Cbfk'sOflka, imkien Ddve, T.e..~u~/f. CAI2390 (714)194-1999. jack A. Henz -2- Planning Commission Application ORGANIZATIONS (cont.) Professional Standards Committee Southern California Amature Hockey Association Torrance Rotary Torrance Chamber of Co~uuerce Torrance Historical Society American Red Cross American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics American Institute of Electrical Professional Engineers Institute of Radio Engineers Eta Kappa Nu Association Member Coach Director Chairman 1st V.P. Director Secretary 1994-present 1984-1994- 1980-1983 1981-1983 1980-1983 1981-1982 1964-1965 1970-1971 1957-1958 1960-1961 1959-1960 BRIEFLY STATE WHY YOU WISH TO SERVE ON THIS BOARD OR COMMISSION, AND WHY YOU BELIEVE YOU ARE QUALIFIED FOR THE POSITION (cont.): California. I have gotten to know Temecula in my years of .. residence. My background qualified me for service. It is ~ time for me to get involved and contribute to my new community, Temecula. ~CH YOU ~ 8~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ,~ .., --.-: .~. ~ CO~I~ ~ORT ~ ~ ~~ FOR JOAN F. SPARKMAN VOLUNTEER SERVICE RECORD COMMUNITY SERVICE: H.E.A.R.T. Foundation Non-prof'~ organization established to help Temecula Member of Board of Directors for eight years Past President of H.E.A.R.T. Foundation eliminate child abuse in Rancho Temecula Republican Woman Member for twenty-three years Chamber of Commerce Education Committee (past) - Member for four years .- Chamber of Commerce Youth Services Committee (past) - Member for three years Chamber of Commerce 1980 to present.. President elect for 1996 Rancho Temecula Area Womens' Club - Member for eight years, Chairman of Scholarship Committee - Member of Temecula Valley High School Stadium Committee committee raised $28,000 for the high school stadium) - Chairman of Child Care Committee (this Sharp HealthCare Murrieta - Member, Board of Directors (past) Riverside County District Attorney's Advisory Committee - Member 1986 to current Firebirds Auxiliary of Volunteer Fire Department Member for ten years, former President, Vice President Rancho Temecula Rotary First Woman Member. November 1987 - president elect Temecula Union School District Governing Board Member, twenty-one years; President, ten years; clerk, two years Elected to Temecula Unified Governing Board, November 8, 1988 (four year term). Volunteer Service Record (cont.) Page two - Riverside County Legislative Network - Chairman (past) 1985 - 1990 California School Boards' Association - Delegate fifteen years Riverside County School Boards' Association - Executive Board Member, past Treasurer, Second Vice President President (past) 1972 - 1992 UCR Steering Committee Member Established a Southwest Education Center BUSINESS INVOLVEMENT: · Temecula Valley EDC - 1993 to present Vice President Private Industry Council 1986 - 1992 Member for eight years, Chairman for six years Member of Chair Committee for State of California Chairman of the Board for Riverside County (past) Selected by County Board of Supervisors to meet with legislators in Washington, D.C., as Representative of Private Industry Council and Riverside County. Executive Board member of National Association of P.I.C., 1991 - 1992 Growth Management Advisory Committee member for the County of Riverside, 1991 to present Riverside County Economic and Community Development Corporation Member (appointed by County Board of Supervisors) - Chairman of the Board, 1990 - 1991 and 1991 - 1992 · University of California, Riverside, Executive Roundtable member 1988 to present University of California Graduate Extension Advisory Board 1993 to present SPECIAL HONORS: · Selected as "Woman of the Year". 37th Senatoria! District (March 1988) ,"Female Athlete of the Year" trophy, given by Business and Professional Women, named "Joan Sparkman Perpetual Trophy" (January 1988) :--" _Z Volunteer Service Record (cont.) Page three - New elementary school in Temecula Union School District named in her honor (1987); The Joan F. Sparkman Elementary School Temecula Unified School District dedication of the Joan F. Sparkmar~ Elementary School on September 21, 1989 Business and ProfeSsional Women: 1986 Woman of Achievement YWCA Woman of Achievement Nominee, 1985, 1986, 1988 and 1989 YWCA Woman of Achievement award, 1990 Chamber of Commerce: 1981 Woman of the Year YMCA Award of Achievement, 1990 City of Temecula proclaimed October 9, 1990 Joan F. Sparkman Day City of Murrieta Proclamation for Community Service, September 29, 1992 APPUCATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO BOARDS, COMMz z z ~ AND C(LIMMISSIONS .:~t,"- ,,,, ,: ,~,,....,.; .. :~,. ,~.,.,.:,,-~tk,y/kadm': Requiremere:, ;nel-'~ant. ef.'dte~CitY~f',Te:,-e c ,4a t~,','L,~':,,:,~;.,::., BOARD, COMMITTEE OR CO~SI~ION ON WHICH VE SER : NAME:A. rZ YEARS ;IDENT ADDRESS: .4.~,1'4"5 C~,,"'J", AI,,"~~,''',+'e.- OFTEMECULA HOME P WORK PHONE: ,4-,Er-H I' 'E; c T EDucATIoNAL BACKGROUND/DEGREES: LIST ANY RIVERSIDE COUNTY OR OTHER CITY BOARD, COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION ON WHICH YOU HAVE SERVED AND ://!~YEAR OF SERVICE: ORGANIZATIONS TO WHICH YOU BELONG: (Professional, technical, community, service): BRIEFLY STATE WHY YOU WISH TO SERVE ON THIS BOARD OR COMMISSION, AND WHY Y~ff~OeU BELIEVE YOU ARE QUALIRED FOR THE POSITION. BE SPECIFIC (Use additional paper ~ nec,sarvl: cHE= P ...... I understand that my or all information oft 1his form may be verified. I consent to 1he reJease of this LEASE NOTE: Applicatimts will be kept an fie for consMe of future vacancies. Return te: City Cierk's Office, 43174 Business Park Drive, T;,,.e_-ule, CA 92390 (714) 694-1989 M Lan~ Clruh~topher ArchHects. Incorporated Larry WellL A.I.A. GoTlard Cl~nstopbeL A.I.A. ~sot~ M W~ens. A.l.A Robeft J, }ls~skelr. AJ.A. 3{lines I~ DICall~Lllo. A.I.A Robert M. 5~mO~S. May 23, 1995 City of Temecula 431 72 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92390 Re: Design Review Boar&Planning Commission Position To whom it may concern: The City of Temecula is master planned for considerable growth during the next decade. Too often this magnitude of growth leads to poorly planned/designed development. I am offering my design expertise which focuses on urban design, as a contribution to the .-' City of Temecula. I would endeavor to ensure that future development occurs in a rational manner, with the interests of the citizens of Temecula at the heart of my decision making process. I look forward to an interview to further discuss my involvement in the future growth of Temecula. Sincerely, / / RONALD A. KUEHL Project Architect RAK:ke 95119.1tr 368~ Mcln Street Suite 240. Riverslcie. Calitornla 92501-2838 (909) 682-2560 Fax. (909) 682-0757 BRIEFLY STATE WHY YOU WISH TO SERVE ON THIS BOARD 011 COMMISSION, AND WHY YOU BELIEVE YOU ARE OUAUFIED FOR THE POSITION. BE SPECIfiC IUse .! ~flir,, a! laler niceelf y): YOU 8~R YOU ~ ~ F~ ~ ~S~, ~ 8~C ~ ~' PLEASE :':, :'lIE: kJ~!lE I~e ~e d be kept m lie Mr :l. Lslhmiilm if ktmu w T L:Ias_ Return lo. City Clado's Ofika, 43174 Budnan M DIke, TI., w_ '% CA 92290 (714) ;1989 .... : · .- .... - -.~;:!::!:;:.. ,:"..-. · -: ;'' --::xj-;";!.~--'--::. .'.- ;.~.... ..... .~.~ .... ~ . '.. ....... _ ~. ' ; -, HOME PNONB 909-694-050~ · =. . WORK ImHONru 909-694-0506 OCCUPA~ON: Business Owner/Attorney..~: :; .... 3~,- EMPLOY~ADD~E88: ,-: - · "' "' "' P.O. 'Box 601 Norco, CA 91760-0601 ' EDUCA~ONAL IACKGROUNDM/REES: J.D. ~niversit~ of Utah-College of Law (1967) Bachelor Of Business administration, Oniversity. of . "- - ':':'- Specialized toursee in business, real estate, taxation. UST ANY P~VERSlDE COUNTY Oa OTH2R CffY BOARD, COMMTrTEE OR COM~flON ON WHICH YOU HAVE SERVED AND THE YEAR OF 8BT~C~ '- Holiday Park Recreation C~.~ittee and Water Board -:-7 :' -~' ORGANIZATION8 TO WHICH YOU BELONG: Ir,~fmmmln ~al. t:~l~il{W. ememmmity. sewi~): .-~.-==~:-.- California, Utah State Bar Associat~ons{ Electric Prcducers P~r Association~ PVF Materials Association. ' .....'~" :-:~ BRIEFLY STATE WHY YOU W~H TO SERVE ON TSS BOARD OR COM86~ION, AND W~Y -, YOU BEUEVE YOU ARE GUAUSED FOR THE POSr~ON. 8E 8PEQRC IUa v~f|~.v' M .: .-+.. -::::~ H nsuellt~): I have a strong interest in seeing sound, economic industry: being attracted to the Tenecula Valley in ever increasing degree. I would hope to be able to have an administrative headquarter office ':- in Temecula ~r~n which I .could operate my pipe, valve and fitting '_' .'~: supply business (CIS-PVF Co.) and eliminate the daily 40 minute drive to Corona-Norco. At the same time, I have a strong desire to '-: ,, ,:,- ~"~C, see an efficient residential growth plan continue here. . See attached page respecting why I believe I am qualified for 'this announced position. I ,. ~_d dl that any er dl k~tn_,,dlk,,, m ~ f~ may he v.mwh'Csd. i c~.m m ~t t= em ~ d elm b~a.,.~tion ~w pub~!e~ luIxme~ SIGNATURE: R.D. Worsley DAT~ May 25, 1995 PI.F. ASE NOTE: AF~J I~:s wil he kslmt on No for e,r,. fdt.:l~_l ~{ulmsmm m, : { bc;ms_ Return m: City Clstt's OffloB, 43174 Bulkless Park Drive, h_, m_ ~f, CA 123N0 {714) 694-1B - .... ' .private. ..... involved: ', of several,.' f to work with a fair -their rights .tO California and li~'S~ ~LConst~;tu~Zton~~' I believe I 'a furthez;~~ed'to by virtue of-my ..knowing :the relative'~:needS:'-'ax~ competing .interests :for land' .use ~n. Riverside Clmnty..envizons.,.:... I :;have. beenLi' programs here., .beth sports and 'scout/ngZ~-'and abreast of the changes ,-~_h~t have' .occured.'iJust five years, let alone ~those is~nce 'Pe-ChO[ the ownerskip of its original master the early 1970's, I wa~ 'eploYed on Aetna in Oakland. .A m_~.Jor ]portton-of my law Department under Roger Galloway-was planning concerns. 'an~ t~eir taxation impacts for California development of this cepany, Being originally' '-involved 'withZ .the and living in 'it ~or-the past several '~ears, need to-assure ~hat the quality' of life 'for 'this region ;is'-maintsined and. e~m-ced is .... ' ' .,c · '-~' I have a very;real-'~terest in seeing that the of Temeeula develops in a .way-~hAt its fnfrastructur~ '~'-. With the inabil~'t~ of the ~it7 'to full~.-contz~1. of the .plans of the Pechanga Band'of-Lu~senO:'Ind~an~_'~' lands, it sees hnperative that .-the Pala' RoaS/Redhawk:;lr~al be carefully' planned so that. the' .roads,--'sewers keep pace -with' the -influx of. neW residents, ~':-:.'i~;:'; · : ~ ,j -.~: ~-- . ..... ' - " ,7 ' :"' "" -- :[j!" :' ' '!"/'!":~::'t" U'r"':~';'! PERSONAL RESUME R.D. Worslev Professional History 198:> to Present Officer and general counsel of t,,vo separa;e conxpanies instr- umental in different asp:cts of the U.S. energ.v industr.V: First. secletar~; and general ¢2-ounsel of Advanced X~rind Energy, a major iilslaller and 'operator of industrial-grade wind-turbine generators in lhe Tehachapi and Coachella Valley areas of Soulhem California, supplying commercial electrical energy to Riverside. Los Angeles and and Kern Counties. (1982-90). Next. vice-presidenl and counsel of C.I.S. Co.. a principal supplier of pipe. valve. and fittings products to oil and gas industB.: and related end users. (1992-95) Also, advisor and counsel to mid-size holel and food clienis m the areas of Santa Barbara, Vetourn, and San Diego, and engaged in private practice in San Diego, Orange, Riverside and Santa Barbara Counties. (1990-92) Private practice centered on real estate, business, and securities lransactional work, with extensix~e overview and emphasis on all domestic and international tax aspects of. lhese transactions. 1977 to 198? 1975 to 1977 Assistant General Counsel. Satnbo's Restaraunls. inc.. Santa Barbara, California. Coordinated litigation and business devel- opmenl nationwide for more than 1.000 operating and 200 planned stores. Additionally, implemenled and oversaw corporate tax policies and slrategies (imernatioaal, federal and. state) for the various locales i,x ~;!fich the company was engaged in Ihe reslaraunl business. Sttbsequefit to dissolution of Sambo's Restaurants. Inc., in private practice, Santa Barb- barn. Venturn and Los Angeles Counties. emphasizing the bus- iness and tax aspects of securities. real estate, and corporate law. Private practice. Oakland. California law fh-m comprised of former members of leading real estate specialist in the San Francisco Bay Area. Emphasized business and real eslate u'ansactional matters and the lax impacts critical to each area. 1972 Io 1975 1968 to 1972 Counsel. Kaiser-Aetna. Oakland. California. Head of 'lax Depm-tmenl for leading real eslale developer in the Unite~ States during mkl-1970's. Kaiser-Aelna ,.'.'as a land development partnership comprised of Kaiser Aluminto.. Corporation and Aetna Life Insurance Co. with holdings undex planning and construction throughout Ihe United States. but heavily invested in Soulhem California. Leading examples were the planning and initial development of Rancho Calif- ornia in Southwes! Riverside County, known today as the Temecula Valley, and !he Warner Ranch of the San Fernundo Valley. Besides duties witlfin Tax Department.--significant portion of time centered on lhe dex:elopment and permiuing processes necessary in a hn'ge-scale land development project. Senior Trial Altorney. Office of Clfief Counsel, Inlernal Rev- enue Service, serving in Ih~ St. Louis, Chicago and San Fran-. cisco offices with special assignments in Washington. D.C. Represented the Government before lhe United States Tax Court. Coordinated taxpayer refund suits with the Departmen/ of Juslice. Also advised IRS personnel on civil tax collection problems and criminal tax fraud referrals to the Departmeal of Juslice. "' Education 1963 to 1967 1958 to 1962 Personal Juris Doctor. Umversitv of Utah School of Law, Salt L~. ~ City, Utah. Bachelor of Business Administration. University of Hawaii, Honolulu. Hawaii. Graduated with honors in top I 5 percenttie of respective 'classes at each school. Specialized training with sehct on- the-job u'aining provided b~: the Internal Revenue Service. Seminars and related training with New York University Law School and Universily of Southern California Tax Institute in advanced business, corporate and real estate transactional problems h'om the viewpoint of critical tax considerations. Married, tv,-o children. Health is excellent. ahhough under medication for recent discover,,' of mild diabetic condition. Residing al: 31012 Dulce Court Temecula. California 92592 (909) 694-0506 References available, from source. upon request. none YOI !$ YOI ~ ~ll ~l ~ ~0~. ~ 2~C ~ ~ ~;- ~ neDasia f): - : :':., I ~ell ~n lwe ~ th~ ~o ~ffom ~ 1978. I .l~t ~ Jrb at ~ve been a pr~er~ ~er' and 'ac~iv~y ~volVed d~el~ p~ for ~n~'s da~~C'p~JecCs. I ~ve ~ a hard vor~, eeMi~ve :co div~se ~u, :n&po~i~ limb_sly ~thatany ofd kdofnmdon on lhb fonu meybe vsd~ml. Ico_,tt ittotho fdeme of kifb,.~ Ikbi for palidly pc' ~ottt. 32216 Corte Chatada Temecula, California 92592 (909) 695-0714 FMPI t')YMFNT: FMPI t~YMFNT: 03/87 - Present 03/90 - Present 03/90 - 10/94 In-~T~ ~ctor. California State University at San Marcos Business instructor dudng 1994/95 Summer Session. Currently, student teaching at Temecula Valley High School and coaching gids basketball. SELF EMPLOYED (')wner. R-eJen Fnterprises . Business Consulting. Strategic Planning, Marketing Plans, Computer System Design and Installation for small and medium sized .companies. Additionally, grove Management Services. Rroker/rlwner: I And West Properties Real Estate Services including the formation and selling of California Limited Partnerships. Rroker/(')wner: A&S FinRnciRI Services -.' Commemial and Residential Loan Services including Small Business Administration (SBA) loans. FMPI OYMFNT: 11/85 - 03/87 01/84 - 11/85 O6/80 - 01/84 ACHIFVFMFNTS: SMITH DRILLING SYSTEMS, div. of SMITH INTERNATIONAL, INC., Manufacture & Worldwide Marketing of Downhole Product and Services for the Energy Industry. r~irector of Administration And qperation Reso, Jrces Formation and implementation of the worldwide integration of Datadril and Dyna- Divisions. Responsibilities include facilities/real estate, compensation, benefits, communications, safety, office services, contracts and recruiting for 240 International and 460 domestic employees in 35 worldwide locations. Director of MRrketing & Strategic Planning Overall responsibilities for strategic business planning, customer service, inside sales to international customers, forecasting sales and manufacturing, new products, advertising, public relations, marketing research, sales planning, trade shows and pricing. Extensive travel to Europe, Middle East and Asia Pacific. MRn~,ger of Marketing Established the first marketing department at Dyna-Drill division. - Project Leader/China. Negotiated and had overall responsibility for 5 year contract to sell products and set up two plants to manufacture products in the Peoples Republic of China. - Project Leader/S.M.A.S.H. Overall responsibility for the implementation computerized Manufacturing Resources Planning System. Achieved Clas~-,~ status. AnHIFVFMFNT-~ con~. - Created a new method of forecasting parts usage and manufacturing schedule based on rotating hours. This resulted in a forecasting accuracy improvement from 75% to 98% and an inventoW decrease of 50%. - Author: Feature article for "Petroleum Engineer International" and *Drilling" magazines. FMPI (')YMFNT: RANCHO PROPERTIES- Rancho Ca!ifomia, a real estate development company. 07/79 - 06/80 Investment R~I F~qte .~,-qles. Generated sales of $3.1 million dudng this one year period. FMPI (')YMFNT: 08/75 - 07/79 ACHIFVFMFNTS: DISNEYLAND, Division of WALT DISNEY PRODUCTIONS, Anaheim, California- A consumer entertainment company. ' .~,,~les M~n~:ler ' Responsible for the profitability of all group sales activities at Disneyland. Operating with a staff of 10 people was responsible for attendance forecasting, pdvate party contracts, Grad Nights, attracting large national conventions to the Anaheim and development of marketing plans and presentation to top management of southem California's largest companies. - Special projects included marketing plans for Walt Disney Wodd, and' planning for new development projects and attractions. - Generated record attendance in nine month off-season of 2.3 million and revenue of $20 million. FDUCATInN: AZUSA PACIFIC UNIVERSITY & CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY Teaching Credmdjal- single subject (High School) 4.0 in all graduate classes. UNIVERSITY OF SOU'I'HERN CALIFORNIA Master of Business Administration, MBA Graduated with honors, Beta Sigma Gamma - Top 5% of class Emphasis in Marketing/Sales Management. UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA Bachebr of Science, Business Administration Major emphasis in Marketing, minor in Finance. Dean's List every semester. Resident Hall Advisor - Marks Hall CLAREMONT MEKENNA COLLEGE Management Engineering in conjunction with Stanford University- 2 1/2 years. Intercollegiate basketball and tennis. Personal References Available Upon Request .-:' , 27349' None ORGAN~A~ON2 TO W~CH YOU IELON8: e ,~s sX, xd. u-'~tks~ mmms~V. ssvld: Board o~ Directors Friends .of French Valley Airport-~;': Formerly Sunrise Rotary ~' ' ~-;:~' '~:' ']:~:-!j :'- BRIEFLY STATE WHY YOU WIBH TO 8BIVE ON ~ BOARD OR COilRI~ON, AND WHY YOU BEUEVE YOU ARE GUAUFIED FOIl THE POBITION. BE IFECIFIC IUse eMilraM ff .~,,, ~: _- .- Temecula is my home, I live 'and work .here and 'plan]t0"!be! a lon~ time,' ~he ~uality o~ life in .:Temecula.~ow..anfi:-~-n.~.e~ depends upon well planned ~easonably designed additions ments to our '~ity., Obviously the work of .the Planning_ is an integral and .important .part of the procesS..:' .; ~ City of Temeeuh Application for Appointment to Boards, Committees and Commissiom Timothy Jay Miller (~ntinu~!) With 30 years' experience in ~,~_!ipg with real estate and busine~ problems, I believe I have the type of broad knowledge of the planning process required to allow me to contribute. Although I have practiced real estale law since coming to Tememah in the spring of !-989, I do not represent any major land owners or developers and as such doubt that I would have si~,niflcant incidents of conflict with matters brought before the Planning Commission. I am able to commit whatever time is necessary to the n:spo~ibalties of a p~intmln~ Commissioner as I am a sole practitioner with complete control of the utilization of my time. BUSINESS LAN, GENERAL BUSINESS AND-WAS A.14m~xu OF T!~ - .,... . _ -- .: .- LIST ANY RIVERSIDE COUNTY OR OTHER CITY BOARD, COBIIITII OR COMIVst'ION ON -- : ,, , ,j -:.: - --,: WHICH YOU HAVE 8ERVED AND TIE YEAR OF 2ERVICE: ORGANIZATIONS TO WHICH YOU BELONG: d~¢,fn,i~ ,~, lmdwi:d, mmmmMty, ,s ,AH): - '-'-:: .... ~..-. PEOPLE HE, PING PEOPLE, BOYS AIID GIRLS CLUB, TH~ CHAI~ER OF CONM!~CX-, RANCID PAMa-CTTAS.jJ OAK GROVE INSTITUTE OF ABUSED CHILDERN, AIQD SHARP HOSPITAT-. {TT~-SX BRIEFLY STATE WHY YOU WISH TO 2ERVE ON THIS BOARD OR COP~glON, AND WHY. ' YOU BEUEVE YOU ARE QUALIFIED FOR TIE POSITION. BE SPECIFIC IUss edditiond Iraper '. oF sx~zzzzsa raxouca azm G xssoczxTzs &xD axvz voaam os txxcz ~,aoj-xcrs aorz~/c~sz.os ~zo~zczs ~o ax.~ orazx tTES vzra, voxn~c xso;-~'z ox TAKES TO HAIE A PROJECT FEASTRE. ' '.;-'.-~:'l~ ' : I~ft~e.sl dllmtenyerdlkile.,,,k~.~enlldsfonnmsybebi$'led- I~z~emtmthefekssl ., ',;bA2E~~~~ ww/beksptentislefannslaa:lle-,dbtMm~;t ,_:~sw_ .-_-:~: Rstumm:C~Gssk's labasssPmkDdve, Ts,,sttl. Clk12390 1"/14}294~ III : ' "" 74 I . ~.'~ Y,~,mmQM.O01 -'..:';' ~-.".~--~ . '..,"* May 15, 1995 To wb~m it my concern: In my twenty-eight years of experience of owning my own business, manape, setting-up businesses, events and fund-raisers, the training of sale staff, public relations, and m.y financing, I feel that I have expe- rience that my be of bendit to you, I have many letters of rectmxm~on and newspaper articles in which my experience is brought fortk I .; have enclosed a few of them for you to read. I have been nominated Citizen of the Year by twenty different' businesses, groups, & members from the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce in 1994. I won an award called The 'T)ermy" Award, trawled after me by the Temecula Valley Chamber O~ Commerce in 1994. The award was for endless hours of contribution in the commtmity in the interest of charity. This is ,,nOw to be an annual award. ... , nave put together a group of business people and formed a nonprofit group called People Helping People of Temecula Valley. This group works on Chrismms programs for the needy and abused children. The group, of which I am president, has come out with many programs and numerous charities. I would enioy the opportunity immensely of hearing from you of any opening you may have that my expe- rience may benefit you. Sincerely, Denny Mighell Letters of Recommendation Newspaper Artides Defray Mighell 40147 Holden. Circle Temecula CA 92591 objective: I am looking for a position in which I can effectively use my experience and abilities, and which will offer compensation based upon efficiency; hard work, and experience. Professional FXperience: 12/91 to Present Paradise Chevrolet, Buick, Geo 26845 Ynez Road Temecula CA 92591 ."' Supervisor: Terry Gilmore Description: Sales & Public Relations, Event Coordinator 06/91 to 12/91 Nissan of Temecula 41895 Motor Car Parkway Temecula CA 92591 Supervisor: Steve Pahner Description: Sales 01/91 to 06/91 Temecula Chrysler, Dodge, & Jeep 26755 Ynez Road Temecula CA 92591 Supervisor: Mike Blanton (909) 676-0010 Description: Sales (Business Sold) 08/89 to 11/90 Alan Voss Furniture 28780 Front Street Ternecula CA 92590 Owner: Alan & Grace Voss (Out of Business - Break-up) Description: General Manager 10/88 to 08/90 Furniture Palace 27874 Commerce Center Drive Temecula CA 92590 Description: Co-owner (Partnership- Split-up) 10/88 to 08/90 Bartlett's Furniture 26936 Cherry Hill-~ Sun City CA Description: Owner (Out of Business) King of Solid Oak 14.562 MainSht~ Garden Grove CA Supervisor:. Karl Description: MariaSet (Out of Business) 1977 to 1982 Ace Old Furniture 23451-2A Ave De La Canlots LaS~na1-~i!i-~ CA Iohn Filipps--n (Out of Business) Description: Assistant Manager & Sales Ronstad's Nite Club 19thStreet Costa Mesa CA Desaiption: C, ener~ Manager The Cowboy Club, Inc. Manchester Ave Anaheim CA Supervisor. Jack Wade Description: Manager (Out of Businns) Performance Pool Co. 8901 Aberdeen Lane Garden Grove CA 92641 Description: Co-Owner (Sold out to Parmer) 1977 to 1988 Mighell and Associates 8901 Aberdeen Lane Garden Grove CA 92641 Description: President 1970 to 1975 Playgirl Club International, Inc. Harbor Blvd. Garden Grove CA 92643 Supervisor. John Andrew & Doug Lambert Description: Manager (Sold) 1973 to 1975 Chief Joseph Trading Co. 8901 Aberdeen Lane Garden Grove CA 92641 Description: Vice-President (Out of Business) 1975 to 1977 I was in a Serious Car Accident and was unable to work for two years. /1964 to 1970 Disneyland Hotel West Street Anaheim CA Description: Worked my way through the company. I started out as a busboy to a waiter and then went into Hotel Security and was made Assistant Head of Security. High School: College: SnmmaO, of Ouali~cafions: .. Highly qualified, as a result of 28 years of suc~esdul management experience in 5ales, .Restaurant Food/Beverage Sexyice, Public Relations Work & Advertising, Fund-raising and other Management Fields. CHEVROLET Tamecull Valley Chamber 27450 ~nez Road #104 Tamecull, CA- 92591 Dear Chamber Hembars, Per request from the lnstalZnt'ion Committee the foilsring is a summary activities Denny tiCShell has either been in charge of or involved v~th i- our communitY- lie arranged for educational computers for tile Boys & Girls club, Oak Grove Institute, and Rnncho l)omicetios- These vere donated by Valley Hicro Computer- lie put ~o8ether a ~roup called people !lelpin~ people (FLIP)- This group ~as ; ~ounded ~ith Jodel from the Bnr~in Bulletin, Chuck Cambell from Valley Hlcrf, o[ Costco, Tish !)1110n Computers, Frank Har~a of Col~ntinl AutobodY, Patty HYcro[tEvans of KRTH Radit~- ~ormallY of the Cali~ornian Newspaper, slid Hark and Hicki Ti~e purpose or Lhe 8~oup is ~o take oat ~he children or the valle~ rot Christtuna, and ocher projects ~hou8h~nzt the yenr- . Denny ~orked on ~he Balloon & ~ls~e Festival vith June Greek and also helped ~et sponsors- lie voEked on d~e Rod Run rot the To~n Association and helped ~hem ~eC sponsors. lie gorked on a [und raiser fo~ ~he T.I.F- or8attization vhlch is a non-prf~Ei~ ~roup. lie ~ork o~ th~s ~ith VirBinia Ross or Sharp llospital- Denny arranged rot (2) tgo pin~ ponB Cnhles to be donn~ed ~o ~he Oak Grove Institute rot abused childran- lie also vss able to Be~ them baseball and many o~her thin~s- Denny gas also involved izt tits Boys & Ci~ls club fund raiser oft Jul7 ~Ch istvolvist8 the ~ruck Siva-a-raY, alonS ~i~i~ the Temecula playhouse and the ~rofessionnl l~omens club- Denny ~as also ins~rumentnl in tile dosta~ion o~ (2) tvo pills ponB tables to the Boys & Ci~ls club and spranged a trip to Lnke Skinner .low the school kids that ~on the jump ~opin~ contest rot ~he American !!ear~ AssociaCton- Deuny is on the Boys & Girls club Auction Board for the Nov.12, 199~ 2nd yenr suc~ion, and responsibile rot the coordination of the hotel-s, ~ood, limo, and funeral service rot the T.V.!!-S- [nmilies involved in the auto accident- ............. _-.-.- r~ nnY aa~qCr, - TFMECULA. ~.A g~F~99 DELWTnY ^oonsss: ~seqs w~z no^D- TEMECULA, CA g~fil PAX isee)s~s.t44s · _800-28 ~-4412 Dear communitY member: This lelter is written to you to introduce you to Mr. Denny Mighell. Mr. Mighell is acting on behalf of myself, and the organtzers of the Kent Hintergardt Memorial Golf Tournament. He may be asking you for hole sponsorship in this tournament. He is authorized to accept any funds you may give him toward this. if you have any questions, please feel free to give me a ~al~' at the Temecula Area Office of tile California Highway Patrol, belween the hours of 8:00-5:00- The telephone number is (909) 676-0112. Thank You for yot~r lime and consideration- Officer Randy Mu~doch CHP Temecula RIVERSIDE COUNTY cols BYRD, ~HERIFF Slledff P.O. BOX 512 · RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92502 · (909)275-2400 May 26, 1993 Denny Mighe11 paradise Chevrolet 26845 Ynez Road Temecula, California 92591 Dear Mr. Mighe11: - Thank you so much for the transportation and food organization you so generously provided to help ease the pain of the loss of Deputy Sheriff Kent Hintergardt- your generosity is important to us, and your time and effort was appreciated. The community has shown its support in this most difficult of times, and I am personally grateful- your generosity will be long remembered- Thank you. COIS BYRD, SHERIFF Ce:jb 27450 Ynez Road, Suite 300 Ternecula, California 92591 Steven W. Inouye Publisher Telephone ~90g~ 67b-4315 4/2 / 5 To whom it may concern: I have worked with Mr. DennY Mighe11 for the past two years. I have the highest level of respect for Denny as both'a professional and friend. As an employee of paradise Chevrolet, Buick, Geo, Denny not only excels in his job at the dealership, but somehow finds the time to support many organizations throughout the community- Denny has contributed more of his time than anyone I know. He has arranged for educational computers for the Boys and Girls Club, Oak Grove Institute, and Rancho Damacitas- He developed "People Helping people'*, a group designed to help needy children-especiallY during the holidays. He has supported the Temecula Balloon and Wine Festival, T.I.P., Great Temecula Rod Run, Temecula T~actor Race and the Chamber of Commerce. This is just an example of Denny's community contributions- As Publisher of Temecula*s daily newspaper, I would highly recommend Denny for a leadership position in any fundraising effort he may choose to support- Feel free to call me at 909-676-4315, ext. #200 if you have any further questions- Best Regards, STEVEN W. INOUYE pUBLISHER 27450 ynez Road, Sui,e 300. lemt. cu|a. CA 92591 AOL.CC)M.5~.qI'UI! · lillY'J| 1~ib-4315 X 2~ * FAX (Y~1699-14~7 A lttDlltlt' I'ublidutt~ Conep,ln) BARGAIN BULLETIN May 5, 1995 To Whom It May Concern: In my 6 years of serving this community and helping to support many fundraising event, I have come to know Denny MiShen. Du .'.S that time I have found no one more dedicated in their efton or time than Denny. There are very few events that go on in this 'community that do not receive his support. Whether it's his support of the Chamber of Commerce, the Boys and Girls Club or the Community Recreation Center Denny is always there. His efforts have not only helped to raise funds for much needed causes but have helped to inspire and motivate a large number of other volunteers. In a town that prides itself on community involvement nobody does more consistently than Denny Mighell. The group that he spearheaded tells it all in its name "People Helping People." This organization and its support of the needy children in our community has gone a long way in a short time with their efforts this past Chris~nas. This community and myself are thankful for having a Denny Mighell living and working here. Sincerely, General Manager 41785 Enterprise Circle South #E · Ternecula, CA 92590 * 9091676-6720 * FAX 909/676-3690 27450 Vnez Pal., Sulk Jo4' ' Temecula, CA 92591 .' Phone (909) 676-5090 · Fax (909) 694..0201 April 17, 1995 To whom it may concern: i.. In January, 1995 Denny Highell received the Volunteer of'the Year Award from the Temecula valley Chamber of Commerce for his service to the'communitY- This was an award that was created due to Denny's ,,behind the scenes" contributions to the Temecula community- All future Volunteer of the Year Awards will be called "The Denny"- -Denny has been involved and continues to volunteer his time and efforts to various community activities Such as People Helping People, The Boys & Girls Club, virtually all Temecula ~alley Chamber of Commerce fund-raiSers, the Temecula Town Association, the Balloon & Wine Festival, the Rod Run, and the Temecula Valley High School Disaster Relief,.t0 name a few. Denny's contributions to this fine community. are certainly appreciated! Sincerely, Alice Sullivan Executive Director :Z'/4SO YMz P,d,, bite 104 Temeoda, CA g2Sgl Ptmee (909) 676-S090 * Fax (909) S9! O~Ol March 23, 1995 Denny Mighell Paradise Uhewolet 26845 Ynez I:td. Temecula, CA 92591 Dear Denny, I wou]d like to take this opportunity to offer my sincere appreciation for your diligent efforts on the 4th Annum Chamrock Golf Classic. The event was ahuEe success thanks to such a hard workinE .committee. This is truley starting off to be a ~Teat year for the Temeeula Valley Chamber of Commerce and I'm glad that you have decided to be .a part of it.. Congratulations on a job well done! Sincerely, Terry Gilmore President April 19, 1995 HEALTHCARE M U R R I E T A Denny Mighell Paradise Chevrolet, Buick & Geo 26845 Ynez Road remecula, CA 92.591 Steven An Sharp HealthCare Murrieta 25500 Medical Center Drive Murricta, CA 92562 Dear Denny, This letter is written to expound upon the genewus nature of Paradise Chevrolet, Buick & Geo of Temecula. Support, from any communities larger business, is integral in maintaining and creating a positive value for development and support of projects. Paradise Chevrolet, Buick & Geo of Temecula has gone beyond the limit of all business in our valley to support projects - from fund raisers for fll children and support of the local hospital to spearheading.capital campaigns for building of community recreation centers for children. While many business place a large portion of their budgets toward advertising in the media, Paradise Chevrolet, & Geo places their funds back into the sole of the community with key sponsorships. And, while many of our Is business support our growing community with dollars alone, Paradise Chevrolet, Buick & Geo of Temecula also p,ac~s manpower hours behind its support. Persons like Denny Mighell, Jim Diaz and Executive General Manager Terry Gilmore stand along side their commit- ments to our community by m~nning booths, selling tickets, setting up tables and chairs and helping solicit other busi- ness for donations. Without the continued support of business such as Paradise Chewolet, Buick & Geo, Temecula would not and could not have put itseft into the forefront of towns in California. They have created an enthusiasm from business and indi- vidual unequaled in any community I have lived. Paradise Chevrolet, Buick & Geo of Temecula has donated hours, dollars and sweat to assure our valley has the best and continues to grow and prosper. Since-ely, Marketing/Public Relations Manager (909) 696.1~0 ~..5500 Medkd C, mer ~ Munk. m, C~ g2~2-gcJ72 DOUG: ATTACHMENT 3 also have the honor of awarding a brand new .distinction tonight* The reason this award was created was because of the person we are honoring tonight. To use the term -Volunteer of the Year', did not sees sufficient for this person, so the name of the Award for future recipients, will also be the name of the person receiving this award for the first time tonight. The person and the award are none other than DENNY KIGHELL! Denny, please come to the podlure to receive the Denny Mighell Volunteer of the Year Award, which in the future will be called.-- the "DENNY". Denny was nominated for citizen of the year by six different people, five separate organizations and numerous businesses- The Chamber recognized that we had a very special person in our community. We felt it appropriate to single this person out for special recognition. The "Denny" may not be awarded every year, as these people do not come along that often. Let me tell you about this extraordinary man .... Denny worked so tirelessly this year for so many warthy causes, we often wondered when he ever slept. Denny organized a group called People Helping People. This group involves individuals that are always the ones who would get involved whenever there was a community tragedy or need. PHP assists the Oakgrove home for abused kids, giving them-Christmas, getting them items of necessity, and getting them computers. PHP was the group that led the fundraising for the High School football players and their families and paid for the funerals. They helped the fire victims and the flood victims earlier this year. In addition, Denny is the persOn that various organizations depend on to help with fundraisers. He finds sponsors for virtually every community event or project that he believes will benefit kids, schools or people in need. He secured all of the donated items for the Boys & Girls Club auction, secured them computers, and assisted with other fundraisers. He secured sponsors for the Balloon & Wine Festival, the Trac~cor Races, Sharp Hospital, Monte Carlo Night, the BPW, the Tomecula Valley Playhouse and tonight~s Installation Dinner. Denny, we can't thank you enough, and on behalf of the chamber of commerce, please accept this special award as a token of our appreciation ...... Would you like to say a few words? A few words (Back to Ron Roberrs) ./ $110PTALK Temecula Valley Chamber awa; Is] rst !hlriZ. be~niml ~lin~,line~r at ~e Pnln M~ IT~L ~W ehnnt~F nnma~ Midhell award tlwy have duld~el -rhe I~n:y' in hi; hml~r. Chnn~r o~elnll will pre- tl~ ddnk Uwre'n~m~ne in U~o~snnne~it~wimnlenml~ .p to Milhell. BuL Limt I' ~mbly ~ I~ Pe~ efLh~'l'em~' nize fU~-fn~r" anal ~Jl~t dopeLimm r,r lily rhihh'cn- -~wU,nWFarkk~ workniL on ' M/~Iwll pnkl 'l't,pmlnv. ; *~ri~ I Iril'hs~ ! 'as,pie hna mh~l LIw lintwho I )nntnril n~ nlnl ( )nk ]ti~iR~ hon,~ ~,r ;Irrl.~l nnd n~ssm~ clfihh'en, prnvidlng gift9 nnd mlm~ ~9 rqnil~enL It ;W:-~I the hdepbh-{:hihl p~m-. whiH, lun~e up ~Y kldp with ~ WlW putvlde (Jhristn~ns pr~n~ f~ thmn. ~:d it hne ~ntl~r~ Wym end lL. ff enimn~ ~ Rive ~ I.~l emerl~n~ f~n19. -rile ~t-;t LhinR I,o pep in ~ kidpil; intn dwii~piLeljn"t ell, w~ daytie~b is n~ · ~mmn et p~twe Chevr~et- 'IL'W Ft to I~ ~e~L~Lhsg-' M ~1~1. w~ ~id he 8e~ hie n~e lG. orKnn~inRn knrele pl.fw ~ n [l~lltl-f~iNer h"' hie eriCi'm foreign exchnnge pr,- ~ thNI im h~n Irondied Ol~ ellentifF I'n~i~L · ~er fin- o~mr, esdime up ~ 80 Iloure n ek mm Is~ ~nntffr w~k- 'l~ke my wife ~. i ~n~ i~lm mwl~ viwiL' he ~kljok- inlly- M e,y w;!l reuwm~r M ighell ~,r bin werk ehn ing Use funernle of tie air v IcLinw of flip I ~2 crneh l~r 'i'mn~dn Valley aowd ~n~ nnd ~nn~l Imi~inE mid twill I ~1err Lhe fan.- J i~ of Uw vi~a:n. ! i e was tis~ -10 ~ '~aued from pale a .. ~1 BUSINESS OF THE YEAR BARGAIN BULLETIN The Barpain Bulletin was established in Temecuia in 1969, celebratinf their 25th year anniversary this year. RecenUy [hey have doubled their distribution and expanded into the liemet area- C, eorlte Martin. General ManaRer. is very involved in the community and volunteers his Ume to many oritanizationt George stated that his staff was very involved in the community. The Bargain BulieUn also sponsors many events such as the Balloon & Wine Festival, Tractor Races. Taste of the Valley, Winchester Fire Benefit and many others. 1994 BUSINESS OF THE YEAR CARUS JR. First established in 194 1. Carl's Jr. now has three locations in Temecula. Carl's Jr. main- tains a high profile in Temecula. fenerously sponsorinl~ events for several ioul entities. Mike Karcher, owner. has donated counUess hours and services to many ioual events and orl/anizations, suci~ as the Sister Cities Association, Grad Nitthe for both Temecuia and "' ,ieta ifitih schools, the Student of the Month proSram and the .lmunity Recreation Center, just to name a few. Mike's dedication and very tienerous donations to the Temecula youth are exemplary and maintain the corporate policy of community involvement. Chamber News 1994 SMALL BUSINESS OF THE YEAR FORTRER TRUE VALUE HARDWARE Bill Fortnet and his son, Tony Berardino. of Forther True Value Iiardware were very excited to hear their business name announced as the 1994 Small Business of the Year. Forther True Value I lardware Store was estabiinhea in Temecuia in 198'1. Ti,e business has sutured the decliefinR ecmmmy and the 1992 Temecula floods. all the while maintain- inll a hillh level of ousttuner service. Tony Berardino L, very involved in several orltmdzaUons. such as the Tractor Race.,. Bny's & Gifts Club and is a Board member o[ the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce. Tony aim serves as liaison to the . Chamber's Local Business Promotions committee. The Chamber would like to contiraLuiate' Fortnet True Value I lardware for this outstandinR award. VOLUNTEER OF THE YEAR DENNY NIGHELL I)enny Highell received an award [hat ~as created especially for him. lie received tl:e first "Denny" award for his outstandinll achievemeots in workinR to as.,ist the needy and local non-profit organizations. Ti~roullh- out the year Denny has worked tireles.,ty fur many noteworthy causes. assisting tratiedy victims and donatinti tireat amounts of his time for various fund raisinti events. Denny stated that all the people who so Renerous.ly volunteer their time and elf. re make this community the special place that it is. 'i am looking for someone 1o share ha an adirJiture... ' -Ganda//'the ~ Main & FronL 8trcct * Old Toss~ Temecula (909) 676-9233 TRUST H UR 5TAFF/NG NF2 S TO A/,FAD/iR Ke//J'T m~ inlernnlimtd company with n ioca/ /w~lg'lin'. cOUrt' S~Tices .Light !#uhtsh~al .7eclnzical Ke!l.l,,~,e/ecr. lemp-toJhil-time/direct placement TK4IEL~JZA KR ~r 694-8490 unv,cus ~_The opinions and views expressed in all editorial material are [hose of the writer or person interviewed and and are not necessarily / those of the Temecuia Valiey Chamber of Commerce, its Officers. or Board of Directors or of the advertisers in the Chamber News. The Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce endorses no person. political undidate or opinion unless specificall)' stated. The pub- lisher accepts advertising on the condition that at no time shall the publisher's liability exceed the cost of the space involved and the publisher is not liable for incidental or consequential damales. __ -./ L TEMECULA VALLEY Unified School District I, UPERNTENDENT PNfiei. B. Novemey, May 5,1994 IOARD OF EDUCATION ! would like r.o thank you and Paradise Chevrolet r:or your generous donation of a day a~- Lake Skinner for the wlnnlng class In the Jump for Heart Contest. Our class spent a wonderful day enjoying a picnic and sports activities on Wed., May zl, 1994 T~e weather was delightful, and everyone had a marvelous outlngl We all enjoyed the pr. esentation by the Park Ranger. It made the day eve..n more sr.,eclal. we really appreciate ali or your effort In putting this day together for us. Sincerely, Kathy Baird Thirty very,;happy third gradersl : ._' ~ ~ 1 "';': ,t RANCHO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 31530 La Serena Way I Temecula, CA 92591 I (909) 695-7150 BO~S & GIRLS CLUB OF T~MECUI,A NEEDS YOUR S"UPPORT FOR OUR UPCOMING CtZARITY EVENT have a ,,Back to the ~un ~ime will be had by all- auction a~d dinne~J~a~iono. the Auction. prooeeds will o a 11 i~· Temecula - you and your guest ~o a~en~ our He also welcome Tiokets are $50.00 per person- auction/dinner. So ~ha~ you may be inolu~ed in our promotions, ~leaee oontaot me for your i~e~iate response. (909) 699-2699, should you bays any questions- that ' yours WhO care and share It is companies like · will help us make this Auction/Dinner ~ success, thus allowing us =o reach ou~ and serve the youth this area · Thank you for your consideration' We are looking forward to your support for this worthwhile cause. S~j~~hell and Ter~~jrY Gilmore Coordinators of Volunteers Taxpayers I.D- #33-0475756 P.S. WE ARE A NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATION SO YOUR GIFT IS TAX DEDUCTIBLE 21475 Yne,J Ro~. IF'J2 lemecul=,. CA (909) 699-1528 Ol~eees Nan W~ke~~n ~fel/denl Calls DIn Mcgee TNeIUf~ Jee~b Mlley Seceele~ Bleed OF Mi~ele Aq~ Freak Jack F I i/fy D~ Li N~e Rem~ez Josh Sparkroe- Joan Wahlig Clltedie Welkef SEP 28 '93 11:Z~9*~'IRLD HCLEP~'i k CO CpA,S/R. CALIF BOYS & 6fitLE CLUB 27476 Yne hmecuit September 20, 1993 To Whom It May Concern, paradise Chevrolet Buick Geo, along With q, erry Gilmore and Denny Migi~ell are acting Auction/Dinner to be held on November 6th, 1993- we ei.oerelY appreciate any and all help you oan oontribute- Michele Aquilino Board Member l~ffi. Ah~D MRS. JOSEPIt P. NARDONE 30195 WILLOW VILLAGE DRIVE MENIFEE. CALIFORNIA 92184 JUNE 3. 1993 MR 7Z~RRY GILMORE pARADISE CHEVROLt:7'AND GiL'O 26845 ]qVEZ ROAD 7~'MECULA. CMJ, H~OPdVIA 92591 D I;2A R .~.I R. ON blAJeC!4 10. 1993 1 HAD TItE OppORTUNITY ~ID MEETAN ESfPI. OYEE TE3IECULA pARADISE CItEVROLET AND OEO NAMED DENNY MIGIIELL DEA~q' C~tlffE 70 TIlE TEMECULA POLICE STA2rlON 7U OFFER ills ttELP IVHEN ONE OF OUR FRIENDS. DEPUTY KENT HINTERGARDT. WAS MURDERED. DENNV I)11.~ N()T KNOIV KENT OR Ills FAI~IILY BUT GRACIOUSLY OFFERED AID AND Si. IpI,OR7' AND BECAItfE A PART OF OUR FAMILY HIE SERVICES AND HELP ~H.:IAT DENNY:' ARRANGED FOR TIlE fi4MIL Y ENABLE.[) KE~rF BE REMEMBERED AS 7~4I~ 77~'UE HERO TIiAT lIE WAS. pARADISE CHEVROLETAND OEO AND CIIEVROI ET' Of..'(~ INC.: SItOULD BE PROUD 70 flA I/~AN OUTSTYINI)ING EMPLOYEE SU~ t AS DENNY MIGIIELL. COPd)IA1,L Y. VICf~7 NARDONE COPIES SENT TO: 7T, RIeY GILJtl ORE, DENNY MIGHELL AND JIM I~ERKINS CiI EVROi, E7' G f, TVERAL ltfANA GER. MR. A,.~D MRS..JOSEI'll P. NARDONE 30593 WILLOW VILLAGE DRIVE M EM1 FEE, G%LI F( ')R M IA 92J84 ,il INE.¢t. 1993 MR. dlltf CI [EV'R(.)L El' a EN E I?, 41, ~. MNA GEl ? P. O. BO, X' 7047 7'Rt)Y M!ClIlGAN 4 8~K) 7- 704 7 DI;:AR ,¢!R : ON' Jf. At?CH 10. 1,c~3 / HAD TIlE Op!~)R'I~IN!7Y 7~ISfEC[ILA pARADISE CHEVR(g.,ICTAIVD GEO NA~fli.;l) I)ENNY M1G!.IEI. L. DENNY C, AjltrE ~) 7HE TEIItF:C..ULA !~OL'iC''I;'' OUR FRIENDS. DIFI"UIY /CENT HINT~_2eGA!eD'I; IGVOIV It.T,,NT OR Ills FAMILY BUT {$RAC!OI ISI, Y ()FFERED AID AND St iI'I't )R'I'AND BECAME A PAliT' OF OUR FAMILY 7h'E SERIqCES AND ItELP ~7tA7'DENNY ARRANGED FOR ~ItE FAMILY I.~IABLED ltT2Vl' BE REMEMBERED AS II-IE 1RUE HERO 7Y-IAT HE IVAS. pARADISE CHEVROL, Irr AND GEO AND CHEVR()LET' :GEO INC. SltOUL, D BE PROUD TO ttA VE AN OUTS]YII~rDING EI~IPLOYEE SUCH DENNY ~IlGItELL. CORDIALLY. VICKI NARDON. E COPIES SI!TVT 2D: .TI'."IeRY 611214017t.; DENNY MIGI:IELL AND dIM pEIeKIN,.~ CHEVROLET GENERAL MANACIER. s~ ~'~ 7~ ~L3 - t~ ~ L45 phon~ lI ~ f ~e_,rc ,5 -I-]~e IV'x'rr'ar~a'F!°~ you ~ord~ fo ~t~cr~'b& ho~ ~ra4ctu l '~ ~c~E¢ 8r,'H~' ~u~ be-Her- helP~nD,dc had d~scus'sed earl~er~- L~ ~kc ~ane ~,ll come tn hand ~o~' ..... 5'he's Vet .bri hf aZd ~,lJ dO ~il- s:nc rely ._..~ etress# and I have to say y the ima~4nable and commitment to this event go bey · I am looking forward to working with you again, because you helped make us a winning team. Thank you again for being there for me when I needed someone · · yours,~ Michelle STATEMENT OF MICHAEL ANTOSCA My name is Michael Antosca I am employed at paradise Chevrolet, Buick & Geo as a General Sales Mane9er located at 26845 ynez Road, Temecula, California 92591- I was employed with paradise Chevrolet at the time the' Respondeat, Denny Mi9hell, was company as a car salesperson- also employed with the same Throughout Mr. Mighell ' s employment with paradise Chevrolet as a car salesperson I was his supervisor and ~ had the ' opportunity to review his performance- Mr. Mighell's performance as a car salesperson was exemplarY- lie rated very high on the General Motors Corporation Customer Service Index (CSI), which is based on customer satisfaction reported directly to General.:' Motor's Corporation- Furthermore, Mr. Mighell met and exceeded all my expectations for hin~ as a salesperson both in terms of overall sales and his demeanor towards customers- I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct- -' Michae'l Antosca ~ CI-IEVRI3_F.T (~ BUICK MIKE ANTOSCA GENERAL SALES MANAGER 26845 YNEZ ROAD * TEMECULA, CA 92591 ' (909) 699-2699 * 1-800-281-4412 STATEMENT OF TERRY GXLMORE My name is Terry Gilmore and I am employed at paradise Chevrolet, Buick & Geo as a GeneralManager located at 26845 ynez Road# Temecula, California 92591. I was employed'with the Respondent, Denny Nighell, at the time he was also employed at paradise Chevrolet as a car .- salesperson- Throughout Mr. Mi9hell's employment. with paradise Chevrolet both as a car salesperson and as a service consultant, I had the opportunity to work directly with him in a number of different situations- In both positions Mr. Mighell performed, and performs above expectations and is entrusted with many responsibilities- Often, Mr. Mighell is given the responsibility of caring for the business outside of normal working hours and is therefore left unsupervised with access to thousands of dollars worth of merchandise- Mr. Mighell has access to the keys and alarm codes for the business and is frequently responsible for transporting'and caring for paradise Chevrolet vehicles while they are not on the vehicle lot. I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct- ~,,. =>- , 1993 "'~ day of '. ..... Executed-..this ~ I"1 II=Vl tl'|l IF.- ! i~ BUICK __ Gee Terry Gilmore 26845 YNEZ ROAD · TEMECULA. CA 92591 -- (714) 699-2699 · FAX (714) 695-2445 CITY OF COSTA MESA .' (71~) 75~-5115 CALIFORNIA 12821-1200 P.O- 8OX I~q]0 F~ ~E ~ ~ ~ L ~N. ~ ~ ~E November 30, 1987 Mr. Denny Mtghell 19671 Occidental Lane !.iuntington Beach, CA 926~6 "' Dear Mr. Mighell: suspect on November 19, 1987- fie stated that without your assistance the suspect would have escaped- On behalf of the members of the Costa Mesa Police Department and .myself, tt is indeed a pleasure to commend you for being a. concerned citizen- A community needs citizens like you to reach its full potential for a safe environment. ~AlamiLos lligh School ~eryice ~xehange students at" ~ei~61 gymnasium Monday at 7 :p.m. A ~it-I Karale artist, Ilita Reno, nlso__wi!_.~i nPl~ear ou~ t!~e prollram-_.~_ MAN-SIZE TROI'IIY--The Hilton D. Bell All Sports Trophy was presented to the Garden (Irate Unified School District stzporintendent at ceremonies Wednesday in district offices. From !eft nre: Fred Dickerson and Denny Mighlll, Rancho Alami t~s pupils; Bell; and Jim-Griffitl~, vice principal. Rancho. The ftancho student body supervised const ruction of the large trophy which wFll be presented each year to GGUSD schoolwith best sports rece rd.. ....... - ...... ADOPT A CHILD FOR CHRISTMAS Select an ornament from our tree, take it to the Customer Service desk to' Register. You will be given a Christmas wish list for the child's number 7ou selected. As a secret Santa please select one or more of the items for the c!'~ild either from the list or something 7ou prefer for the age 7ou've chosen. Then return the item or items to the service desk. We will pick it UP and see that tile child receives it in time for Christmas. You may also drop OFF your gift items at Bargain Bulletin Monday thru Friday 8a.m. to 5p.m or Saturday 8a.m to noon. People Helping People is a non-profit organization helping the irtre-, ~, abused children and batterod wo;uc~, of Temecula Valley. We wish to thank each and every one of you who help bring some joy to our children anti families~For more information on our organization please feel free to contact either of the following: Denny Mighell Paradise(Buick 699-2699 Jodell Zeal Bargain Bulletin 699-6720 Evelyn Mottimer Precast Masonry 698-6431 Thank You, ~ Happy Holidays ' People Helping People If we can be of any assistance please call any of the above numbers. ALL DONATIONS TAX DEDUCTiBLE-AND GREATLY APPRECIATED lhessalonika FamllU Senices Im.lewaLm~Pm~ P.O- Box 890326 l'emecu|a, CA 92~89 909-694-852! FAX 909-676-:L~ | 6 October 28, 1994 Attn: Denny Dear paradice Chevrolet We at Rancho Damacitas are excited about your interest in our children this Christmas season. Christmas unfortunatelY, for many. of our children it is a time of depression and:r'emembrances of painful emotional ex~erlences- Feelings associated with rejection and abandonment cause our children to think of themselves as worthless- Fortunately the children or Rancho Damacitas have a .. community that has accepted what ..the true meaning' of Christmas is all about. The desire to give and provide hope for another is one part of the meaning of ChrisUnas. Your help this year in providing ~Y wonderful gifts for the children will bless their lives. Even more than your gifts is the gift you have given by demonstrating that the children here are worthwhile and that they are cared about. The sincere love and concern you share will help to make this the best Christmas that most of our children will have. As we attempt to build positive traditions in the lives of our children, traditions that we pray will make ~ ~ing a par~ of ~is ye~s season, will have .[ut~e ~efi~s ~at will not ~ se~ for years. On behalf of the children and staff or Rancho Damacitas, please accept this letter a token of our sincere and heartfelt appreciation for your kindness and your investment in the future of our children- You are truly a blessing for us. · '...end whoewr welcome~ · child in my nlme welcome~ Me-' Methew 18:5 Thank You ! Administrative Assistant NEYIS RELEASE PEOPLE HELPIN6 PEOPLE mode Christmas wishes come true for over 170 children in the greeter Temecule ve!ieV ereas end provided food and gifts for approximately 45 ramfiles. This was no simple undertaking end the directors of PHP wish to extend their heartfelt congratulations to ell the wonderful people of this area who contributed their time, effort and gifts to make so many wishes come true. Also, e specie1 note of thanks to Target, Costco and K-Mart for allowing PHP to display their adopt a child Christmas trees. : A majority of the children on the PEOPLE HELPIN6 PEOPLE wish list were from Rancho Damecites and Oak 6rove Institute. Erica Staub, a representative from Rancho Damecites reported that prior to this year, her children suffer from post-holiday blues. This year, things have definerely changed after the communities over-wheimin9 display of holiday spirit. PEOPLE HELPING PEOPLE does not limit their program to Christmas. Last year they were instrumental in sending children to Storm games, the Great Temecula Tractor race and private emergency needs envolving children. They ha~e already set into. piece a monthly birthday party program along with Brunswick Bowling and Costco for birthday cakes. If you would like additional information, the Board of Directors for PEOPLE HELPING PEOPLE are: Denrig Meghill, Paradise Che~;rolet; Jade11 Zeal, The Bargain Bulletin; Evelyn Martimer, Manager PHP; Frank Maria, Colonial Auto Body; and Chuck Campbell, Valley1 Micro Computer. akm _lka km. lma('mkr Mmm~md~t~mm~ Ram'~ J~n,h F~wr Homes P.O. Box 890326 Temecula. CA 92589 909-69~-8521 FAX 909-676-5516 Aupt 23, 1994 People Helping People We:hez~at ~ho ~,,mcitaswouldlike to ~oryou e~orts cnbehal~ of ~-~cso Damac~tas. The children hexe at R--~o Damacitas benefit greatly fromco-.-'.;~m4L~yi~volvement- We are here to make adifference in ~hei: lives, and you all are also helping to make a' difference in a chiid's life. X want to ~hankyou a~ain for your effor=s. It ks refreshin~ to know that our cowwm,n4=y cares about' ~he welfare of o~hers. Without:your help we would notbe able to provide ~he services we do. We ere a non profit 501 (3)(c) organization which means that all donatiou are 100% tax deductible. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me at (714) 676-5516. Thank You, 0" Erica Staub Aa~; n4 strative Assistant -...aad wbeever wekelesaddld in my ume welcolles Maulew 111:5 11:csm lonika Fandig Sen4ces P.O- Box 890326 Temecul.~. CA -"""g-69J-g521 FAX August 23, 1994 To Whom it May Concern: Please let this letter serve as authorization for the group of People Helping People. People Helping People are representing Rencho .. Damacitas in their efforts. Rancho Damacitas is a group home for children who have been removed from their homes due to abuse and neglect. Without the help of people like them we would not be able to provide the quality services we do. If you have any questions please feel free to contact our office at (909) 676-5516. ..- Thank You, Erica Staub A~ministrative Assistant "...mild winre'It · ,~l¢.me~ m child in m.t nmm~ Rancho Damacitas WithOut help, children who have' ~uffered violence at home may become entangled in patterns Of violent behavior thaf will continue for life. Rancho Damacitas was organized to help free them from these destructive if you visit~ ~ ~ ahome, not ~ ~s~m~on. ~ ~ ~ for ~ home- ~n~ -- one "mo~er ~d ~ffier" ~r' home ~ six'c~~, ~ong wi~ soci~ work~ ~d a pm~ssion~ ~cmpist. 0~ home-~n~ ~ d~ply co~U~ h~b~ ~d wiv~ sel~t~ ~d ~ ~ o~ ad~S~five s~ff- and d~ot~ to ~e chH~n 24 hou~ a A child m~ s~y with one ~ o~ "~li~" from one t0 ~e y~- ~ n~ed, he or she ~eiv~ ~seling Ed ~e~ ' so~~ ~ong ' wi~ ~e nam~ ~ly. Most ~~nt, ~e Eds l~m ~~ ~ple ~d intemc~on h~ ~ have h~ffiy ~onships~ ~'~-~en.enco~ · to ~cipate in co~~ p~~s such ~ o~~ ~. ~r chu~h 'youffi group activi~es~ ' ~ ~e c~d~n ~n't able to"~ t0:ffieir ~n p~n~,'~-~ be place' into o~ foster paint p~g~, .whe~'ffi~ WIll con~n~ t0 ~ce~ve much chan e we ve been ab - -Of course, only time will tell h6w g make in the lives Of the Children who-have been with us since we 0pe doors in 1983. But the county and state authorities throughout California w o . sent us these kids tell Us they like what they see at Rancho Damacitas.. Unfor- tunately, there are always'more children that they'd like to place with us. So, '. we're continuing to expand as we're able. And ..we're doing eve .rytliin,g we can .. to make a difference in these ¢hildren's lives.- . "': ' ; -. , ' ~.. -~ ,, October 28, 1994 Thessalonlka FamliU P-O- Box 8g0326 Temecu|a. CA 92:589 909-694-8521 FAX '-676-5516 To Whom It May Concern Please'let this letter serve as authorization 'for the group of People Helping People..'.. People Helping People are representin~ Rancho .-' Damacitas in their efforts. Rancho Damacitas is a ~roup home for children who have been removed from their natural homes due to abuse and neglect. Without the help of people like themwe would not be able to provide the quality services we do. If you have any questions please feel free to contact our office at (909) 676-5516. Thank You, Erica Staub Administrative Assistant "...and whe~,~r welcomes n child in my namff welcnme.~ Me." ,-'~"'~anhew Ig:.~ September 6, 1994 Attn: Denn~..Mighell ..... Thessalonika Fandly Sentees Box 'lemecul:h CA 9U,I-6yJ-,~.~,' I FAN April 5, 1995 Attns Denny Mighe11 Dear Denny, We at Rancho Damaci=as woxxld like to say *Thank You" for your donations of board games, toys, clothing, bikes and many o=her wonderful things for our children ~o enjoy. Your continued donations have had such a special impact on all of our children. We appreciate all ~ha~ you do. Because of loving, caring, and generous people, it he~ps us in providing a safe environment for children who have only known ~rauma. You can be assured that your continued efforts have had a direc~ impac~ on =he children. Again, please accept this letter as sincere apprecia=ion for your effor= and concern:in making the world a be=~er place for.abused children. Rancho Damaci~as is a 510 (c)(3) agency which. means all donations are tax deductible. Sincerely, Erica S~aub Administrative Assistan~ °' ...anti whlK'~'Tr lhe 'lhmilul Fan:ily Seffice,s qnu-fC,~-55tc, 3anuary 12, 1995 People Helping People C/O Derumy Miles 26845 Ynez Road Temecula, Ca 92591 Dear People Helping People, Just a note to express our appreciation for all of the wonderful work you did on behalf of the children placed at Rancho Damacltas this Christmas. Your efforts and those of all involved is not only appreciated but ~s demonstrative of the sensitivity of concerned otherS.. Usually children who have been victims of abuse and neglect do not look with favor upon the holiday season. Many times only painful emotional abuses are remembered about this time of year. Not this year. With your sensitivity and effort our children cannot look back without remembering .. a joyous and supportive Christmas season. You have helped us to create a new tradition in the lives of the children here. The many wonderful gifts you have provided have touched their lives and have made an impact for years to follow. Not only the gifts you have donated but the sincere concern the community has sixown will have shown future benefits. On behalf of the children and staff of Rancho Darn~citas, please extend our heart felt thanks for providing hope through your efforts. Sincerely, Erica Staub Administrative Assistant Thessalonlka Fandly Sen ce,s Sap=ember 6, 1994 A==ns Denny Mighell We here at Rancho Damaci=as would like to ~hank you for your donation of various electric games, clothing and ~oys. We were able =o dis=ribute all of ~he i=ems ~o =he children. The children en~oy =he games & toys. It was nice of you =o think of us. You have truly ~ouched the life of others. Again, please accept this letter as sincere appreciation for your effort and'concern for the many children placed at Rancho Damaci~as. Rancho Damacitas is a non-profit 501 (c)(3) agency which means all donations are =ax deductible P.O. Box 89032(, Temecu|3. CA 92.~89 909-69.4-8521 FAX 909-676- ~ 516 Thank you, Erica Staub Administrative Assistant OAk G vE INstitutE February 28, 1995 Denny Miehells People Helping People Paradise Cheverolet Temecula, CA 92591 Dear People Helping People, We at Oak Grove Institute would like to take this opportunity to thank you for your support of our children and our program. It'.~ not very often that people give the kind of support and enthusiasm that you have demonstrated so unwaveringly- We are grateful for your sensitive attitude toward the children and appreciate your thoughtfulness. Thank you again! Sincerely, Thomas C. Lester Executive Medical Director /~/.'~' hh,,.'~,'..\'.s'..~s. %1: ~ss ~% ( .\ ~12~'62 (~/(,'~V~ 677 ~'.."/'t lAX ..,/i ~':t 6~1,%.01hl Oak Grove Institute March 24, 1994 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN This letter will serve as authorization for DennyMighe11, pARADISE CHEVROLET, Temecula, California, to request and/or accept donations and contributions on behalf of OAK GROVE INSTITUTE, FOUNDATION, INC., a non-profit (501-C3) residential treatment facility for children located in Murrieta, California- Thomas C. Lester, M.D-' Executive Medical Director' TCL/dc 2.1775 Islhr~n A~ln~:i. Murril i;~. ('A ~/5'51t2 ('!()'l) It / I-55'1'1 j AX' (')O.']) I,'/IbO'l/,l Oak Grove Institute e ~une 1, 1994 TO WBOM IT MAY CONCEFal This letter will serve as authorization for Dennis Mighells, of .. a donation of ping pong paddles TARGET, Temecula, California, on behalf of OAK GROVE INSTITUTE, FOUNDATION, INC., a non-profit (501-C-3} residential treatment facility for cl~ildren located in Murrieta, California- Thomas C. Lester, M,D. Executive Medical Director TCL/dc (909) (~77-~99 FAX [gO~t) 698-0461 ?,t)75 .IdhmyJx A~.C',,v~r. Mur~irt:,. C.~, 92562 27338 JeHerson Ave. Temecula, California 92390 Phone: (714) 699-5888 watts: (.SO0) ~2$-515o /,,,,,~ 6, 27338 Jefferson Ave. Tem~cula, C, alifornia 923.no phnne: (714) 699-5888 %Vatt~.~ (80{}) 228-515{I '3 Jamestown VOI. 26 --NO. 51 SundBy. May 2~. 1~93 ~4 Pages i!ilssmmlesndN~-ifT' %l~SlegeLinem~lnoc0~~TeamculLMurdms,'Ntnsr~l~}um~s3SCENTS --, James continues fight for life; supporters gather .-e~l~e~ I ml~ MI4Me JBwws mm ; Ibe MC Sen ~ I~dl~sl Cee,le,', elsie Ws Iseefil, Iml~e 'llte/wertbM bmlmmrem ' m m.sRelmm,/mmmmmmm. al.lmmm' mlmm~.lrJ3/ iwemmmm me~mmee( Jmoe3 rite rmmd u'~ wsmmsy lu truer timlied ~ Is mewel MIB. me 15 ~ MI- Dm~ lm Imm umr4samld 9o tIM cmr mid M Mr mealera ueme. emmldmed m NO, h C. mmMy hal . ijvlee tw me ' .Mmms m.' SBw~.' IJamem mid ~e.. TIre Immily's cmr ,ms mm~ll'mereera ramram1~. IR-lllt immMaDills · ' Ateanmlsttme. Uietrlll. e14er [MmmlteeClnlRmldetOWmYel ,q.. .:.- VOL~I--NO-SO s4 Pages NCHO Family's struggle prompts outpouring of concem .,,.-,-.. in the wake of tragedy. Par- adise Chevrolef is looking to- ward the luture. The Temecula dealership combined efforts with businesses throughout the Tem- ectjl8 Valley to raise money Ior the lardlies of slain ~ officer Kent Hlnlerg(xd and Nilson Stewall Jocobs. Hintergard and Jacobs were killed May 9. Two events have raised approximate- ly $8,500. Fundraising events included a Memorial Day Victims Benefit and Bowling Tournament at Ptnky's Bawl in Tamecute and an event with dance lessons and a raffle at Mldnighl Bound-up, also in Ternecula. Wade Man- agemeal of Inland Valley and Budweiser also contributed to the event. Businesses throughout the Tamecute area have opened their doors and wallets in re- spons~ to the tragedy by donat- ing money, inventory and ser- vices and load at the events and funeral services. Contributions still may be made to the Hlndergordf Chll- dren's lrusf at North County Bank, P.O. Box 235, Temecula 92590 and to the RCWO Tad lot Balltony Jacobs, (Trustee: Ran- cho California Water District), Wells Fargo Bank, 30580 Ran- cho Cllilornie Rd., Ternacute 92591. ContribUtions to be 'divid- ed amon. g all 'four children in- volved may be sent to the VIc- Iirns Memorial Fund, Paradise Chevrolet, Attention: Denny Migheli, 26845 Ynez Rd. Teme- cule 92591. Dear communilY member: This letter is writlen to you to introduce you to Mr. Denny Mighell. Mr. Miglmll is acting on behalf of myself, .and the orgesllzers of the Kent Hinte~gmdt Memorial Golf Tournament. He may be aski.g you for hole sponsorship in this tournament- He is authorized I~ accept any funds you may give Idm toward this. Ir you have any questions. I}leese feel free to give me e ~sll at the Temecul~ Area Office of tl~e C8lilo;nia Highway pat:ol, between the hours of 8:00-5:00- The telephone number is (909) 676-0'112. Thank You for yo.r time and consideration- Ollice~ Ranely Mu~d{.~ch CHP Te,necul~ A child's c pecial edication Two-year-old Marissa Ann Hintergardt participates in her own way during the dedication Monday of a park in her slain fa- ther's memory. A tree was planted in memory of Temecula Police Offi- cer and Sheriff's Deputy Kent Hintergardt, who was shot and killed last May when he answered a call regarding a family disturbance. Marissa's mother, (second from left in the background) Linda Hintergardt, also was on . hand for the park dedica- ' tion. Approximately 200 people attended the ded- ication ceremony at the park, which is located on Via Cordoba. one half mile east of Pala Road off Loma Linda Road. "Staff photo by Shaun Hall *** MEMORIAL DAY VICTIMS BENEFIT & BOWLING TOURNAMENT 100% of all proceeds to.... be distributed to the families of: OFFICER KENT HINTERGARDT and ALLISON STEWART JACOBS ~ COlvII'ANY I}OWLIN G TF, AM COMPETITION Come & cheer on your {avorite company team ~ 1,o'rs ol; RAFFLI~ I'I~IZI~S ~ Aiq~ETIZEI~ !tUFFE'r ~ MINI AUCTION ~ MUSIC/DANCING -~ FREE CHILDCARE " ~oNB~v, ~Av a~st- ~ !.l_.._.m_.~.~.10 pm.. ............ BOWL 28720 Via Montezuma · Temecula For more inlormation call 909-699-8367 Co-sponsors pINKY'S BOWL TEMECULA pARADISE CI IEVROLET 7rEMECULA TICKET DONATION S5 L)o~ed lid pdnlld by Mhwtemm, Press ~EMOIZIAL BENEFIT FOR THE FAMILIES ~ DEPUTY SHERIFF 'KENT HINTERGARDT AND ALLISON STEWART .JACOBS $5.00 COVER CH~R8E - ALL pROCEEDS TO 80 DIREcTLY'''/~0 THE FAHILIES' SATURDAY. MAY 7.9. 1995 NOON TO 6:00pm "'- AT Saloon and Dance Hall 28791 FRONT ST, TEHECULA, CP-, 92590 (909) CONTRIBUTIONS HAY BE HRDE TO: HINTERGARDT CHILDREN'S TRUST NORTH COUNTY BANK P.O. BOH 235 TEHECULR. CA- 92590 694-5686 '"SPONSORED BY: 'RCt4D TRUST FOR BRITTANY 3ACOBS' (TRUSTEE: RANCH0 CAL. NATER DIST.) NELLS FARGO BANK 30580 RANCH0 CALIFORNIA RD. TEHECULA. CA. 92591 TO DONATE RAFFLE ITEHS OR VOLUNTEER ITEHS CONTACT: 6.3. DAVIS AT HIDNIGHT ROUND-UP (909) E94-5686 DENNY HIGHELL RT pftRRDISE CHEVROLET (909) E99-2699 HIDNIGHT ROUND-UP .. pARADISE CHEVROLET MASTE Hi"tNFIGEHENT OF INLAND VI~LLEY Prin,ng Compliments of Cregsr PHnting, (TJOg) 676-4.5f).,g Nov. 6,1993 5:00 PM Ben Franldln Budding Tower Plaza * Temecula We are in need o1: donaled items t~ be auctioned off at the 1 st Annual GFeat Tmmecula example~ ~ auctionhie i~ms. erie ~ ~ & Girls ~ub ~om ~e Si~en~ Auction ~11 ~n ~ ' · "' All Silent Au~on donali°n![m~e~rl~!.e' made by Wednesday, Nov · For more Information contact Denny MighelJ at (909) 699.2699 at The i~oys & Girl: Clu ( ' TEMBCUL Thank you for your generous luBpc:IHI ~lmm IIII' I _~illllll [: ,I '~ at the MIDNIGtlT ROUND-TIP 28721 Front St. Temecula on DECEMBER 13th .; WINCHESTER FIRE BENEFIT Live Entertainment with Brandy & The Midnight Roundup All Star Band. · Food · Pool Games · Raffle Prizes · Dance Lessons For more Information ca!l: starting at 6:00pro .., Join local citizens as we pay tribute'to our area's Firemen and raise funds for the over 25 families who suffered losses due to the recent fires in Winchester- S 10.00 Donation Per Person (909) 699-2699 ot (909) 6'76-5090 All Proceeds Will Go To Benefit The Fire Victims Sponsored by: Midnight RoUnd-Up, paradise Chevrolet · Buick ' Geo, Bargain Bulletin, K-HI 105.7 F.M., The Californian, I~_~ncho News, dk Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce, Hemet News, press-Enterprise and KRTM 88.9 F.M. 10121191 2852 572-80-9730 NISSAN OF TEMECULA,;V~/CA DENNY MIGHELL 41895 MOTOR CA 199i PILOi iONAI GUILD Dear Nieasn Salesperson:-~. " ... On behalf of the 1991 Niaean professional Sales Guild, I would like to extend my sincere congratulations for scoring 80% or higher on the 1991 pATHFINDER This year's program continues to challenge all Ntssan salespeople to perform well in the areas .of sales performance, product knowledge, end customer satisfaction, It is only when you achieve excellence in all three areas that you become s Nissan Sales Guild professional- Product knowiedge is an important pert of cluallfylng for the 1991 Nisaan professional Sales Guild, Scoring well on the quizzes will help you achieve this coveted honor, We wish you continued success throughout the year, R.R. Henhum General Marketing Manager Nissan DIvision cc: Dealer Principal , ** - Pul ing e, 5ukk Meier DIYIsi~ ~.,f~ersl Idesors Coq~sdo~ FIlm. Michils~ 41550 Hay ?, 2992 Nr. Denny J- HLVhell paradise Buick-they-Gee 26845 ynez Bd Temecula, CA 92591 Dear Dennys Congratulationsl The results of the 1992 Buick productRaster product Knowledge Competition have been tabulated, and you have placed among the top l,O00 Buick sales professionals in the United States. .d- and ve hope.you w~ll Your framed productWamter Certificate is enclosed, display it proudly where your customers can see it. The prize winners for 1992 Grand Pries -- e-st Curtis Dulln Fred Oregg Buick, Inc- york, PA Second Prize -- East David S. Elllthorpt HcNally's Chevrolet-Buick, Inc. Flushing, HI ~hird Pries -- East John A. palmleri DIxie Buick, Inc. Ft- Hyers, FL Ora-d Pries -- Welt Clotus M. aotty Schneider pontiac-Bulck-GnC Hastings, HH Seco-d PrAse -- Welt Scott H. Koehn Buxman Wetors, Inc. Hasten, KS tkird Pries -- Welt David R. Lateon Johnson Chevrolet-Buick-Pontiac Warroad, HN Again, this yea~ ~he competition was extremely close, There were so individual NVI/D performance was a several perfect test scores, significant factor in determining national top winners. your partic£pation in the 1992 productHeater product KnowledV® Competition is appreciated- Best wishes for continued Buick euccesst Sincerely, J. H. Laxmr Director Education and Training JHLzed Enclosure SMITH BARNEY, i=IAR,RIS UP!=IAM & CO. 4~ MAC~T~ SUrE !1o {714~ 752- june 2, 1982 Mr. Denny Mighe11 8901 Aberdeen Lane Garden Grove, CA. 92641 Dear 1~, Mighell: "" My firm has confirmed to me that Smith Barney's Government Trading desk and our Capital Markets Group will assist you in the purchase of large blocks of U.S. Treasury notes and AAA rated money center bank notes to:serve as security to a lender. Our commitmemt:to you in matching collateral for any future lender will remain intact assuming the following requirements are met.. The notes in question will be delivered to a U.S. bank or Trust company upon receipt of funds to Smith Barney. The notes will act as collateral for the term debt instrument. Our firm will require verification of protected funds by the custodian bank and will require notification that such sec- urities be purchased. A reasonable time period will be allowed tc execute such purchases of collateral. In the case an insurance annuity is required, Smith Barney requires the same quidelines be followed. For purposes of securing a hypothetical S100 million loan, we will act to deliver $66 million in 13% Treasury notes due 1992; and $34 million AAA Chase Manhattan notes due 1992. the maturing principal value would be $100 million in ten years. required, please feel free To If additional information is contact me. William L. Hendricks Block Investments DEAN WITTER REYNOLDS INC. #5 World Trade Canlet, New.York, NY IOCN8 April 7, 1981 AI.4H C. SHYDEll Senior VIce PFesMe,'ll Insurance Sirvim Jeek lee 16255 Venture Boulevard Eneino, CA 91436 Re:: Placement Ability Dear Jack: You have asked us if we can piece $500,000,000 with a quality insurance ecrupony such that tl~ey will guarantee to pay $600,000,000 ten years later and $31,500,000 each year for ten years. Subject to the availability of funds, we feel that this transaction is possible- Our belief is based upon our discussion with a major insurance com- pany who has indicated their willingness to accept such a transaction- This indication is predicated upon a closing within ten days. ACS/dh co: Denny Migheli HARKER ENTERPRISES P.O. Box 105 I Temecula. CA 92593 (909) 699-3132 Iton~e 19091 699-0061 Fax 1909) 699,.8761 (800) 284-3688 ; DENNY MIDHELL · COORDINATOR - ---.'.[ :':.: ".... '..,~:.-..-..'--:~-:-.4..'-",:.:-v~:.::~. ,::-.~-:.'~':-. :,;."· -'. : "' :::::-~ .-. ~Z.':"::"...."i:~:- ~:..:...: . .,. .... . ..... ~:'~ ;:.~:~:::~'.'; "~.' ',;: :.. "':{:(C-L:':':~-~.'::.-!:':.~ !" :',' ii~:;': :':;::--~;~::~':~:,:! '-'[~ ~-:::'-: (909) 699-26997 '~ :1-800-281-4412 Furniture Palace ,F/r,7,1 C-,.~llllllplCp C'elllnl 111 ,e, ufln I DENNY MIG!!ELL 71 d ~76.65~5 !'AX '; 1.16~9 02,q4 DENNY MIGHELL I I ~artktt'~ ~urnitur~ i 26936 CHERRY HILLc : ~ SUN CITY, CA 92381 i ~'71AI 6791262 ; .Z: ~ .~ ~ ~ [ o ~,zn,z~ " 'l 'i.;M !.;("t I I ,A I ){ ) I H; I.: C.!IRY.qi ,ER ,I I.;1.:!' 7 14167(N}0 10 I{!~.. Tglql;;t't..'l.,x. (?A WACKO ENTERPRISES "THE EVERYTHING COMPANY' DENNY MIeNELL 27574 Commerce Center Dr,. Suite 138 (714) 676-6585 TemeCula, CA q2390 FAX (7t4) 699-0284 NISSAN ()F'fEMECUI-A 4111q5 M,,n-' Cnr I'k~v.~. 'le,nl'c.h~- t'A 92562 17141 67f*'(~r'lll HARKER ENTERPRISES P.O. Box 105 I Temecuin, CA 92593 49091 699-3132 /~""~,~ Home 1909) 699-006~ ,~ 1800) 284-3688 Fax 19091 699-8761 THE 1994 DENNY" AWARD PRESENTEl) TO Dl.:NNY MI(;IIELL ! \ \I'1'1,' !.:CIATIt}N r'()i,' YOUR Ol :'i'.%'i'ANI)ING {'t ~\~i't', I!IUTIO\ {}1' '! IMI-; ANI~ I-2NI)l.!-:.'-iS \t~l~ ',IILER l!Ot i:', I¢~ THE t'ttMMI:\ITY. TIIF -"}MMF.\:~"- ':{'~ I:0R A/it ~x ; .\ !;El't ~\t , · t ITEM 19 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY MANAGEi~~ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council J. Sal Mu~oz, Councilmember June 13, 1995 League of California Cities Inland Empire Division Split RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council instruct the Mayor to send a representative to the June 28th General Membership Meeting of the League of California Cities Inland Empire Division to voice the City of Temecula's position regarding a proposal to split the Division into separate Riverside and San Bernardino divisions. It is also recommended that the Council instruct the Mayor to submit a letter to the President of the Division before the July 24th deadline stating whether or not Temecula supports the proposed split. BACKGROUND: See attached memorandum. League of California Cities Inland Empire Division MEMORANDUM Member CBies Banning Beaumont BlVthe Callmesa Canyon Lake Cathedral CIty Chlno Cl"dno HIlls Coachella Colton Corona Desert Hot Sl~ngs Fontana Grand Terrace Hernet Highland Indian Wells Indlo La Quinta Lak~b Elsinore Loma Llnda Montclalr Moreno Valley Murrieta Norco Ontario Palm Desert Palm Springs Perrls Rancho Cucarnonga Rancho MIrage Redlands Rialto Riverside San Bernardino San Jaclnto Temecula Upland Yucaipa TO: FROM: DATE: RE: INLAND EMPIRE DIVISION MEMBER CITIES J. SAL MUNOZ, PRESIDENT CITY OF TEMECULA JUNE 1, 1995 PROPOSED SPLITTING OF DIVISION AS some of you may be aware, the Riverside Mayors end Councilmembers Conference recently passed a Resolution calling for the separation of Riverside County cities from the Inland Empire Division and the creation of a new Riverside County Division of the League of California Cities. This would mean that the San Bernardino cities would have to become their own division or join another division. (Enclosed is the proposed Resolution). In the past, this issue of splitting the Inland Empire Division has created controversy among the member cities, and yet there are good arguments pro and con. It is necessary to deal with this issue again in light of the above- mentioned Resolution. Therefore, we are dedicating the June 28th General Membership Meeting exclusively to this topic. It is important that all Inland Empire Division cities participate in this discussion, preferably at the June 28th meeting, where all the arguments can be heard and weighed. Toward that end, I would ask that each of your Councils: (1) agendize this issue for discussion either prior to or after the June 28th meeting, or both; (2) send a representative to the meeting; and (3) thereafter be prepared to submit a letter from the Mayor to this Division by July 24, 1995 stating whether or not your city supports the proposed split. The June 28th meeting will be held at the Red Lion Inn, Ontario Airport (specific announcement to follow). The letter from cities should be sent to Mayor Mike Wickman, City of Chino Hills, 2001 Grand Avenue, Chino Hills, CA 91709 (Phone: 909-590-1511 ). Please give this important issue your attention so that all cities' votes may be considered in making recommendations to the State League Office. This issue will likely be dealt with formally at the Annual Conference. A RESOLUTION OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY MAYORS' AND COUNCILMEMBERS' CONFERENCE SUPPORTING THE CREATION OF A SEPARATE' DMSION OF THE LEAGUE OF CALWORNIA CITIES TO BE DESIGNATED THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY DIVISION OF THE LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES. Whereas, Riverside County now has over one million residents and continues as one of the fastest growing coumim in Calibmia; and .-' Whereas, the Riverside County Mayors and Co, m~'lm~nbers hSve many common concerns and problems; and Whereas, there would be a Mayors' and Coi, ncilmembers' or~ni~on which meets hi-monthly; and Whereas, there exists an oppommity for the new Riverside County Division of the Lea~e of California Cities to meet concurren~y and eliminste the need for six meetings per year; and " Whereas, in so doing, there would be an opportunity to increase attendance and activity because of the common interests. Now, Therefore, Be It Resolved that there be a separate Division of the · of Csllfornia cities desi led as the Riverside County Division of the League of CAlifornia Citi~;L~e It Further Resolv~ the existing treasury be split between ~e two separate Divisions. Passed, Approved, and Adopted by the Mayors and Coun~imembers' Conference of River. side County at its regular meeting held m Palm Desert, California, on the 17th day of Mar~k 1995. by unarfunous vote of the membership present. ATTEST: IUDITH BAITINGER, SECRETARY RIVERSIDE COUNTY MAYORS' & COUNCILMEMBERS' CONFERENCE ITEM 20 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFIC~~.~R CITY MANAGE CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Mayor Jeff Stone DATE: SUBJECT: June 13, 1995 -' Proposed IRS Regulations to End Tax Exempt Assessment and Mello- Roos Community Facilities District Financing PREPARED BY: RECOMMENDATION: June Greek, City Clerk Direct staff to prepare 8 letter protesting IRS consideration of removing tax exempt status on certain types of municipal bonds. BACKGROUND: The California Public Infrastructure Coalition (CPIC) has been monitoring IRS proposed regulations that distinguish tax-exempt governmental obligations from taxable private activity bonds since December 29, 1994when they issued these proposed regulations. Cities are now being asked to take a position in opposition to consideration of these changes as they relate to Assessment and Mello Ro0s Bonds. Attached are the arguments of CPIC and a recent article from the CalBond Journal which address the impact of the proposed IRS regulations. A draft letter is also attached which is proposed to be sent, under the Mayor's signature, stating the City of Temecula's opposition to these projected changes. ATTACHMENTS: Draft letter in opposition, dated June 13, 1995 CPIC letter dated May 26, 1995 CalBond Journal Reprint (March 20, 1995) California Public Infrastructure Coalition Issue Backgound Jeffrey E. Stone ~r Karel F. Unclemane Mayor Pro Tern J, Sal Muftoz Councilmember Ranaid J. Parks Councilmember Ranaid H. RobeIts Councilmember [909) 694-6444 FAX [909) 694-1999 City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drke · Temecula, California 92590-3606 June 13, 1995 Internal Revenue Service CC:DOM:CORP:T:R (FI-72-88) Room 5228 P.O. Box 7604 Ben Franklin Station Washington, D.C. 20044 RE: Definition of Private Activity Bonds - Impact on Assessment and Mello-Roos Financings Ladies and Gentlemen: The City of Temecula consists of 40,000 residents, and is located in Riverside County. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) is currently considering the adoption of new Private Activity Bond regulations which may as they are presently drafted severely and negatively impact our ability to finance public improvements with tax exempt financing. We do not believe it is appropriate that these regulations be adopted in their current form. Public agencies in California often establish special financing districts to fund necessary basic infrastructure, such as roads, sewers, water and flood control improvements, schools, parks, police and fire stations, and other public facilities. Assessment districts, which are one example of this type of financing, enable a public agency to sell bonds secured by assessment liens on properties located within the district. Mello-Roos Community Facility Districts, which are a second example, enable a public agency to sell bonds secured by special taxes on properties within the district. Unfortunately, the ability of public agencies such as ourselves to use Assessment Districts or Mello-Roos Community Facility District may be practically eliminated, if the current proposed Private Activity bond regulations are adopted by the IRS. As an issuer, we have not attempted to provide in this letter a detailed technical analysis of the proposed regulations. However, we ere providing this letter to you because we have been advised that there era technical restrictions in the Proposed Regulations with respect to assessment end Mello-Roos bonds that possibly would hinder our ability to provide basic infrastructure. We understand that the Proposed Regulations could practically eliminate our ability to utilize development agreements to insure that adequate infrastructure is provided for our jurisdiction; further, the Proposed Regulations seem to "clash" with the existing ragulatory practice for subdividing property in California. We also understand that the Proposed Regulations might dramatically restrict our ability to levy Mello- Roos special taxes by generally requiring levies to be proportional to benefit and to be equal for both business and non-business landowners in the financing district. We believe that the proposed regulations are inappropriate for the following reasonS: 1. Public infrastructure owned and operated by a public agency are clearly constructed for public purposes and should logically not be subject to Private Activity Bond regulations, Not only are these improvements intended entirely for use by the public, but all contractors ere selected utilizing the public agency issuer's bidding procedures, and construction worker wages must comply with the prevailing wage schedule used by the State when constructing its public works projects. 2. From a public policy perspective, it makes no sense to cripple California's already financially-strapped public agencies by making it even more difficult and expensive to finance badly needed public improvements. Over the past ten years, Assessment District and Mello-Roos District financing have provided over $15 billion in funding for public improvements in California. Where would we be today if these financing sources had not been available? Where will we be in ten years if the proposed Private Activity Bond regulations are not clarified? 3. A major reduction in the availability of tax-exempt land secured public financing would have a significant impact on the Stats's fledgling economic recovery. Aside from the obvious impacts on the construction industry, the costs of housing and office space would certainly be affected. In addition, California's ability to attract and retain industry, including projected jobs related to NAFTA and Pacific Rim-related business, would be threatened. One must question the stats's ability to sustain any level of consistent economic growth if land-secured financing is only available on a limited basis. Improvements that are typically financed by assessment or Mello-Roos bonds are numerous. The following list illustrates some of the purposes for which special taxes authorized by the Mello-Roos act may be used: (i) local perk, recreation, parkway and open-space facilities; (ii) elementary and secondary school sites that satisfy the State Allocation Board Standards; (iii) libraries; (iv) child care facilities; |v) construction and undergrouding of water transmission and distribution facilities, natural gas pipeline facilities, telephone lines, and cable television lines; (vi) payment of any special assessment liens on property in a CFD; (vii) any work on public or private buildings That is necessary to comply with seismic safety standards or regulations. Among the improvements authorized to be constructed by an assessment district are the following: (i) grading and paving of streets and roads; (ii) construction of sidewalks, perks, bridges, tunnels, subways or viaducts; (iii) sanitary sewers and related facilities; (iv) storm drains and related facilities; (v) street lighting facilities and electrical and telephone service facilities. We understand that the following provisions of the Proposed Regulations are problemstic with respect to Assessment District and Community Facility District bonds and strongly urge the Internal Revenue Service to make the following changes with respect to the Proposed Regulations: 1. The deletion of the "discharge of primary legal obligation" rule of Treasury Regulation § 1.1 41-3(b)(8). 2. The deletion of the "mandatory tax or other assessment requirement" of Proposed Regulation § 1.141-5(c)(3). 3. The deletion of the "equal basis requirement" of Proposed Regulation § 1.141-5(c)(5). 4. The deletion of the 3-year period in the "temporary use exception" of Proposed Regulation § 1.141-3(f)(2). We note that there are other technical rules in the Proposed Regulations that impact our ability to finance basic infrastructure, We strongly urge you to carefully consider the issues presented in this letter as the resolution of these issues may dramatically impact our ability to provide basic infrastructure for our jurisdiction. Sincerely, Jeffrey E. Stone Mayor JES:gf May 26. 1995 Jeffxey Stone Mayor pro Tempore 43174 Business Park Dr Temecul~ CA 92590 RECEIVED MAY 3 01995 CITY MANAGER CALIFORNIA PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE COALITION Proposed IRS R,.gulstions to P. ml Tax P-xempt A.~t~.enent District and Mello-Roos Community Facilities District Financinl Dear Mr. Stone: On June 8. 1995, the U.S. Internal Revenue Service will hold a public heating to discuss its newly- proposed 'Private Activity Bond" regulations, which would eliminate federal tax-exempt treatment of interest on certain types of municipal bonds currently used by California public agencies to finance infrastructure. Specifically, these regulations would. make interest payments to bondholders taxable for most Assessment District CAD") and Me!!o-Roos Community Facilities District CCFD') bonds. At a minimum, the cost to public agencies of financing roads, sewer and water improvements, flood control facilities, schools, and other infrastructure with AD and CFD bonds would increase by 20%-25%. At worst, the public capital market would exhi'bit little interest in federally taxable bonds to fund public infrastructure, essentially eliminating these two funding mechanisms, which have financed over $12 billion in California public improvements over the past ten years. The California Public Infrastructure Coalition ("CPIC') was established to educate the ]RS and California' s ConFessional delegation on the devastati~ impact these proposed raguladons would have on the ability of public agencies in our State to build essential public facilities. We are sending this letter and the enclosed materials to you as well as other public officials and leaders throughout the State. Our objective is to encourage you to contact the IRS and your local Congressional representatives and assure the-continued availability of federaliy tax-exempt AD and CFD bond issues for public infrastructure, even if your own community does not currently utilize either of these mechanisms. The IRS and some members of our Congressional delegation do not re~qlize how heavily California communities have relied on ADs and CFDs to finance public infrastructure since the passage of Proposition 13 and the resulting reduction in funding for public facilities. They also have not considered the impact on the State's struggling economy if the availability of these financing mechanisms is decreased and/or the costs of such financing are dramatically increased. By designating AD and CFD bonds that finance ~cture as "private activity bonds" simply because a landowner has been required to build these public improvements in order to gain entitlemeats, the IRS regulations are ignoring the fact that this ixt-as~cture is entirely publicly owned and operated, fulfills an essential need for governmental facilities and clearly benefits the public. The idea that a public school or road constitutes a private activity just doesn't make sense. May 26, 1995 PaSe 2 HOW CAN YOU ~ The most important initiative you can undertake is to contact your Congressional repre~mativ~ end educate them on this important issue. This is not a psrtisan issue. These proposed rule changes tffe~ California end any community with current or fnture infnstrucmre needs. In addition, the IP, S has provided en address to which commeras reSarding the Private Activity Bond regulations should be sere:. Please send your comments to the followinS address erior to the June 8 hearing: CC-DOM~CORP:T:R:(FI-72-S8) ." Room 5228 Internal Revenue Service P. O. Box 7604 Ben Franklin Station WashinSton, D.C. 20044 We have enclosed a comprehensive analysis of the proposed rule chan~es end a sample letter. Please review these as qulcldy as posm'ble. When sendin~ the letter to the IRS, please add some information regarding your community so that the IRS is not receivin~ en identical form letter from every California public a~ency. This totter is of extreme urgency. Please wri/e to the IRS and contact your ConSressional representative as soon a~ possible. If you have any questions, you may contact Paul Holmes, CPIC's Executive Director, at {916) 441-3300. Sincerely yours, Tom Daly Mayor, City of Anaheim Dr. Robert L. Keeves Superintendent, Poway USD Enclosures T: e Ca on ourna._ Shedding Light on California's Public Finance Field IRS Rules Would Harm Mello-Roos, Assessments; Comment Sought.from Local Califomia Officials A set of proposed Internal P, ev- enue Service regulations could harm many of California's Mello. Roos and assessment transactions, forcing them to be sold on a tax- able rather than tax-exempt basis in the futur=. Many of California's public fi- nance officers may be unaware of the potential problems that are lurking, partly because there is of- ten limited publicity about arcane IRS bond ref~ulations. But some officials who have studied the regulations say they hit direcfiy at the way California issuas suttcture many Mello.Roos and assessment transactions. The clock is ticking for local finance actors and other public managers to comment on the regu- lations---wrinen comments are ~ by May 1, and a public hearing is planned for June 8. The IRS par- ticularly wants to hear from issu- ers about the regulations' impact on specific projects and programs. Although the '.,n.nn.nn.nn.nn.nn~a of the pro- posals will vary among issuers, "it's clear that thi, is problematic" in California, said Perry Israel a parmer of the law firm of Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe in San Francisco. dons almost three months ago; the action marks the first tim,. in about 23 years that the Service has weiShed in with a full set of regu- laxions pertaining to private activ- ity bonds. (ConStess in the mean- tailed the use of tax -exempt bonds lations spell out the details of implementation.) lssuers of Mello.Roos and as- sessment bonds try to avoid clas- which cannot be sold on a feder- ally tax-exempt basis unless they fit into limited exceptjons. These exceptions include deftare housing and industrial development bonds. One IRS test known as the ties a bond as a private activity bond if 5% or $5 million of an issue's proceeds are loaned to a nongovernmental person. Mello. Roos and assessment bonds have escaped this provision in the past because they fit into an exception for "tax assessment loans." The proposed regulations raise concern because the exception would now require that special taxes be imposed "in an amount proportionate to the benefit to the assessed property." Such an ap- proach flies in the face of how Mello-Roos taxes are tailored in Californiz, sometimes to exclude c~tain parcels or to have other INu'~ls pay a higher coat if there is a reasonable reason to do so. "That's a real killer for Mello- .- Roos," said Sharon Sumton White. a principal of the San Francisco- based law firm of Jones Hall Hill An even more troubling con- tern ames because of a new type of test for private business use. The regulations say this use occurs when a financing discharges "a primary and unconditional legal obliration" of a private business (an IRS example is provided in the box on the next page). The example is particularly troublesome to many in California because it appears to cover many common development a~ that pave the way for issuance of building permits in California. "That's exactly what we do around here," said .Dean Weiner, a partner of the law firm of O'Melveny & Myen in Los An- geles. An IRS exception would allow for "temporary developer use" as long as the property is sold w the Senearl public with "reasonable" limited relief, but it also could be thorny to implement when vari- ables are beyond an issuer's or developer's control. Other problems with the pro- posed regulations also could arise. Under one example, it is pos- sible that a Mcllo-Roos deal and a redevelopmentbondissuecouldbe lumped together as a single bond ixy bonds--even if they wexe sold vid,,-Hy qualify as private activity debt--if their issuance accom- plishes an overall sinSic purpose. "The fac~s of the example speak to the difficulties,' accord- ing m an analysis of the proposal by Jones Hall Hill & Whixe. "It is often common ro issue both mx incremcn~ bonds and s~ses~.ru or Mello-R.oos bonds m accomplish an overall single purpose." The IR.S will prepare final rcEulafions once the public com- mcnt period cnds. The U.S. Trea- sury Dcpanmcnt could adopt thcm as early as this sup,ran All bonds issued 60 or more days ~ the adoption date will fall under the White said it is her personal belief that "several areas don't re- flect the Congressional intcn~,' which raises hope for changes to the proposals. It is also clear thax the fcdcral government is looking for various v~ays to a~ i~ own financi~ problems, and resu'icfing the issu- ance ofmx-exen~ bonds could be one small piece ofxhs puzzle, es- pecially if local officials seem un- perturbed about some of the cban~es. 17,e CalBond Younxal can sup- ply ~ with the Intmml Rev- sine &s, vice addrss for submit- ling comments. Tax lawyers men- rioned in this aracle, and those at other firms, also will assist issu- ers by providing more derailed ex- planations of the proposed regu- lations, which are 143 pages long. ., * Summary of IRS example As a condifion to obtaining a per- ntit to construct an industrial devet- olsnent, DeveJoper X uncond~y aBzees that it will construct govern- mentally-owned streets &nd side walks in its development Bond pro- ceeds are used in part to construct the street and sidewalk improvements that X is obligated to consn. uct X's merits is unconditional, and therefore the disdmx3e of that obligation results in private business use of the proceeds used to construct those improve mentx (Scaxy stu~.This lRS example describes many local California ar- ranSements.) O 1995 The CalBond J~ Relmnted from she Mar~ 20. 1995, edifion o The Ca!Bond Jmsmsi wish permission. Dsms Waiters, Publisher. CalBond's address is 423 F_ Ojai Ave., Suits 107-502, Ojai. C~f. 93023. Please call {'80S) 646-1475 for morn infornmtm. Ca!Bond is dedicNed to serving local finsrace officials shroughout California. )~BZ, ZC ~'~,0;'~'13]~ CX)LT~ZO~ ISSUE BACKGROUND On (ace., "xr29. 19N. the IRS bead P~;.=smd Ileg, la~es that disdngubh tax :~ obli~ben tl:xabb pl+elte$ctivity beldl. Jnthlk cl. m'mlt hxm. these ~,.,om'e~ ~ si.'lrlly undmcutth$$b$iytofirsnc$~ pubic inifinructum in CsdicsW$ on s taxi 'e_,q.X basis. and Jewmeal ,.s_ll And Mego41oos Bends Are Critical To r-nfomla's Continued nm~sb.--,~s,lt Of P,,hliC Infrempe-h,-e California Melo-Roos bonds aJone have been issued. Cod~,.:ss Clearly Intended To Protect The AbiBy of MunittpalNm To I~ue Tear I:~remot Bonds For TradiUorml nm,&~,,e.llal Purmmes The Proposed Regulations Undercut Congressional Intent By Jeopardizing .asssss.,ent And Melio-Ro0s PubI'm Inframructure Financina financing test. A bond issue meets the private business tests if more than lO% of the ixoceeds of the issue am used by one or more nongovernmental persons (such as a. developer) in a private business and more than 10% of the bonds are payable from property used by private businesses. FLaTJar, bonds am not lax- exempt if under the "private loan financing test' morn than the lesser of 5% or $5 million of the proceeds are used to make loans to private parties (whether or not private businesses). At a minimum, the following sections of the Proposed Regulations must be changed to preserve the tax- exempt treatment of many assessment and Mello-Roos financing sfnJctures. Dische, us Of Develooe's Oblloation To Construct Public Imorovements Should Not Be Considered Private Business Use. It is the norm in California for a developer to be required to pay forthe required painesand approvals for the project. Pronosed Reaulation Section 1.141-31hi(B) treats this arrangement as prohibited private busbess use of the dmmioper. This requirement must be rilelad from the Pzc,,a eed Rt, Fd'qons. The ravek_lr ;vre,~:;,,,-/From The Private n,,-;nea Use Test M,,m Iqe Redse~ Ree,,.qtnq.JlEe,m 1.141-3fNm does not ca-~'er the developers ue el ~ public im private bUl~!l l use alder bltlld Cirma,..IN~gl IIAv. i~er, this gmbd , clic:l~n k..i:)lmYqd,~ely requifa M the di~,!!qxr must rlmmnlbly except thi from the imuw cl818. Three ymra k m shtxt b' any r_--g.aLdy dad d/rl:;:,mm and this requ'r. ,.I. admuld be ddetld from thl dl~Y~:l:lr '~irqon. Moreovlr, d;/ai:F~rs diouId not be forced to d adl bind in qe,.a~F_,lnL Lame or ,_te.lon of land should be peffnltted. The l=q:e,q~on From The ledvale I ,-an FlflndP- Teat ForTix Assese,,,.l,4 sonds SI1mdd Not. l:,,q,,de Ilwle-Roos Bonds. Mdlo Row bond~ wl be Wxal~ a loan Ii.-~.~ te~ unlmm tllly QUdily fix the .I Faal~oll for tl~ ~ bollall. Undlt prr..-m~tl nenldmirel Sections 1.141-~t~Pj1. tlx '--leel .t..it Ixmcll (i) rally not ule dillemit ,,Jthods lot Ixadnen and non- Ixatnen bsrlr.~,ies c~ public imlmT-a.,~a (excalX for diMl,x,-Ikj~ based on rulative benelits c~'~,..1) and (a) must be levied on a propeny fromage. ad vakxem. basis or cc.,~m,,ble method th8tf~iJ~ts~nth8~;3a&~it~f8peCiajt8Xe8t~d~L~e~1tsk~N1efj~jngfr~mtheim;xcve.i~ an amount 'lxr. qxxtb'kMe to the bendIt to the -:seesad property.' Mdlo-Roos taxes need mX be use aealaliom are co, , ., ,r.~. Melo-Roos taxes must, boy, T:...-, be ap;xxtiead on a reasonable basis. The more kadb,e concreAs~ rn:mosed ReT s-fion Section ~ .~4~-3(e)(3~. whereby diffemntratescBnappiytokcl~usmifhral~arectstQmar~anclmasQnable, Infrastructure I.,.xo~_.,.t,ds Sl~,,Id Not ne Considered "FunqtioP-IIv And Imeorall~ Relate ToANewDevelomnem. Use ol public /~etovenants by a private ~ on the same lxtsis as the general public is not private blabass use. Under Proposed Rernd-tion Section 1 a bond-financxs:l fa~ 'functionally and inteOr~y' rslatsd to a pdvam b~liW whsm sjQnificam public is not used on the eme basis as the geneal public and results in pdvate bainess use. For typically considered ftmctionaly and imegra!ly related to a new development which mmy result in pdvate business me. For inslance, aschoel or municipaJ waterfacllity that bconslNcted as pan c~a rmw mixed-ae devdopment could ctmceivably be subject to theae mlet Acconingly, the a new development must be deeted as inconsistent with the punic nature of such imlxovementt The Anti Abuse Rule Are OverIv Broad. Example 1 of Proposed Reaulation Section 1.141-15b} steps together two bond issues (that would otherwise qualify as m-exempt bonds) issued in separate years. The first set of bonds was issued by a municipality to acquire land subsecluenBy granted to a ~ business for a corporate headquarter. A second Bet of bonds was issued for mamebondim~swhouldnatbemppedtogeWertocrateanmggmgatWmxai~bo~issue 2 TEMECULA COMMUNITY S ERVI C ES ,DIST.RI CT ITEM 1 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT HELD MAY 23, 1995 A regular meeting of the Temecula Community Services District was called to order at 8:14 PM at the Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. President Ron Roberrs presiding. ROILI CALL PRESENT: 5 ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: Lindemans, Mufioz, Parks, Stone, Roberts DIRECTORS: None ' Also present were General Manager Roneld E. Bradley, General Counsel Peter Thorson and City Clerk June S. Greek. PUBLIC COMMENTS None given. CONSENT CALENDAR " It was moved by Director Stone, seconded by Director Lind·mane to approve Consent Calendar Items 1-3. The motion carried as follows: AYES: 5 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 Minutes DIRECTORS: Lind·mane, Mufioz, Parks, Stone, Roberrs DIRECTORS: None DIRECTORS: None 1.1 Approve the minutes of May 9, 1995. Acceotsnce of Landscape Maintenance Areas and Residential Street Liohtino 2.1 2.2 2.3 Minutee.c~l Accept the deeds for the TCSD landscape maintenance areas and direct the City Clerk to record the documents; Accept Tract No. 22762 into the Rancho Highlands landscape maintenance rate level. Accept the residential street lights. -1- Award Professional Services Contract for Materials Testing Durina the Construction of Rancho California Soorts Park Imorovement Probet No. PW94-O7CSD 3.1 Award a Professional Services Contract to Geotechnical and Environmental Engineers, Inc. (GEE) to provide material testing services during the construction of Rancho California Sports Park Improvement Project No. PW94-07CSD, in an amount not to exceed ~18,634. 3.2 Appropriate $18,634 for the services contract and $1,864 for 10% contingency for a total of $20,498 from Development Impact Fees to the Capital Project Fund. DISTRICT BUSINESS Consideration of Fee Reduction for Filmino at the Community Recreation Center Assistant City Manager Mary Jane McLarney presented the staff report. Director Lindemans stated he could accept a 50% reduction in the fee. It was moved by Director Stone, seconded by Director Parks to reduce the fee to $3,000.00. Director Lindemans asked that the motion was amended to a 50% reduction. Director Stone amended his motion, Direction Parks amended his second to approve a 50% fee redution to ~3,250. The motion was unanimously carried. GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT None given. DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT Director of Community Services Shawn Nelson announced the Senior Transportation Program started today, and stated the City is excited to expand services to seniors that would otherwise be unable to use the Senior Center. He also announced a Public Workshop on May 31, 1995, 6:00 PM, regarding 1995-96 proposed rates and charges. BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS None given. Minutes.ted -2- ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Director Parks, seconded by Director Stone to adjoum at 8:28 PM PM, to a meeting on June 13, 1995, 8:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. The motion was unanimously carried. Ron Roberrs, President ATTEST: June S, Greek, CMC, City Clerk ITEM 2 CITY ATTOR~E~RO~L TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: PREPARED BY: (~ RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a resolution entitled: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT Board of Directors Ronald E. Bradley, General Manager June 13, 1995 TCSD Proposed Rates and Charges for Fiscal Year 1995-1996 .- Beryl Yasinosky, Management Assistant That the Board of Directors: RESOLUTION NO. CSD 95- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ADOPTING RATES AND CHARGES FOR COMMUNITY SERVICES, PARKS AND RECREATION, STREET LIGHTING, SLOPE MAINTENANCE, AND RECYCLING AND REFUSE COLLECTION SERVICES FOR FISCAL YEAR 1995-1996. BACKGROUND: The purpose of the TCSD Rates and Charges is to provide necessary community services and programs to property owners within the City of Temecula. The TCSD is currently comprised 'of six (6) city-wide service levels and are identified as follows: 1. Community Services, Parks, and Recreation. 2. Service Level A - Arterial Street Lighting and Median Maintenance. 3. Service Level B - Residential Street Lighting. 4. Service Level C - Perimeter Landscaping and Slope Maintenance. 5. Service Level D - Recycling and Refuse Collection. 6. Service Level R - Streets and Roads. The formula used to levy the rates and charges has not been changed from last fiscal year. Every non-exempt parcel within the City will receive a rate and charge for two (2) service levels: Community Services, Parks, and Recreation, and Service Level 'A'. Only those property owners who receive benefit from four (4) service levels pay for those services (residential street lighting, slope maintenance, recycling and refuse collection, and emergency maintenance of unpaved roads). Further, the City Council has suggested the implementation of a new program'entitled Revenue Excess Sharing in Temecula (REST). REST is designed to share with the residents of Temecula some of the effective economic development programs implemented by the City Council that have generated new revenues to the City. As a result, the City proposes to absorb ~ 162,000 in administrative costs that, without this program, would have been charged to the Community Services, Parks, and Recreation budget. This savings of ~162,000is proposed to be passed along to all property owners in Temecula, which will create a proposed savings of $4.27 for all single family residences. .' Therefore, the rate and charge for the Community Services, Parks and Recreation Service Level, for single family residences, is proposed to be ~68.88, and increase of only ~1.38 for the year. This increase is due to the addition of four (4) new neighborhood perks, one (1) community park, a comprehensive lighting system to the Temecula Middle School ball fields, a non-motorized recreational trail, and the expansion of community recreation programs provided through the Temecula Community Recreation Center and the Old Town Temecula Senior Center. For Service Level "A" , the proposed rate of ~4.16 for a single family residence represents a decrease of .02 cents from last year. Service Level "B" includes only those property owners within residential subdivisions that have street lighting services. The proposed rate of ~26.92 per property owner represents a increase of .62 cents from last year. Service Level "C" includes only those property owners within residential subdivisions receiving TCSD maintenance of slopes and perimeter landscaping. The four (4) rate levels for Service Level "C" will not increase from last year and are identified as follows: Rate C-1: ~46.00 Rate C-2: e89.00 Rate C-3: $116.00 Rate C-4: ~175.00 Service Level "D" provides the Recycling and Refuse Collection Program for Fiscal Year 1995- 1996. This service level includes all single family residential properties in the City of Temecula. The proposed yearly rate of ~172.06 has increased ~2.70 from last year. This is due to an increase in the Consumer Price Index (CPI). The proposed rates and charges for Service Level R will be considered by the Board of Directors under a separate resolution. WI4RREAS, the TCSD further finds that based on the Rqxyrt and budget, the rates and charges as set out on l~rhlhit "A" arc the reasonable cost of the Services and/or Facilities to be provided by the TCSD for Fiscal Year 1995-96; and WHERBAS, the TCSD proposes to collect the rates and charges at the same time, in the same manner, by the same persons and together with and not setmmmly from, the property taxes collected within the TCSD. These rates and charges shall be delinquent at the same time and thereafter be subject to the same delinquency penalties as such property taxes. All laws applicable ~o the levy, collection, and enforcement of property taxes, including, but not limited to, those pertaining to the marlors of delinquency, correction, csnce-!l~fion, refund and redemption, are appficable to these rates and charges, except for CalifOl'Dia Reventle and Taxation Code Section 4831. However, if for the first year the charge is levied, the real. property to which the charge relates has been Wansferfed or conveyed to a bona fide purchaser for value, or if a fien of a bona fide encumbrancer for value has been created and attaches thereon, prior to the date on which the first installment of such taxes appear on the roB, then the charge, or the delinquency in that chsrge, assessed pursuant to this section shall not result in a rich against the property, but instead shall be Wansfen'ed to the unseaLred roll for collection; NOW, Ttn~k'~ORE, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEIVlLr'ULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT DOES m~R~:my, RESOLVE, D~ AND ORDER AS FOTJOWS: Section 1. The rates and charges for Fiscal Year 1995-96 as set out on Exhibit "A" for the Services and/or Facilities are adopted for Fiscal Year 1995-96. Section 2. The TCSD shall collect such rates and charges at the same time, in the same manner, by the same persons and together with and not sq~rately from, the property taxes collected within the TCSD. These rates and charges shall be delinquent at the same time and thereafter be subjea to the same delinquency penalties as such property taxes. All hws applicable to the levy, collection, and enfoxcanent of property taxes, including, but not limited W, those pertaining to the matters of delinquency, correction, cancellation, refund and redemption, are applicable to these rates and charges, except for California Revenue and Taxation Code Section 4831. However, if for the first year the charge is levied, the real property to which the charge rehtes has been transferred or conveyed to a bona fide purchaser for value, or if a lien of a bona fide encumbrancer for value has been created and attaches then~n, prior to the da~ on which the first in.~sliment of such tax~ sppear on the roll, then the cbar~, or the delinquency in thS cbar~, ~,.~med pursuant to this seaion shn not result in a Hen again.~ the p/opctty, but iostead shall be tnmsfeffed to the ~m.~.~:red roll for collection. Section 3. If a prope, ty owner subject to these rates and charges challenges or questions the levy of the rates and charges to such pwpeny owner's propc, ty, such propc, ty owner must' appeal the levy by filing an appeal with the TCSD Secretary before 5:00 p.m. on December 1, 1995, pursuant to procedures emb~ by the TCSD. Section 4. If a prope~ owner subjea m these rates and charges believes that payment of the rates and charges for fiscal year 1995-96 would create a lm'dship for that property owner during that fisc~ year, such lxo~ny owner must appeal the levy by filinE a hardship ~ with the TCSD Secretary before 5:00 p.m. on December 1, 1995, pursuant to procedures established by the TCSD, in order to be considered under the hardship appeal program. .. Section 5. The TCSD Secretary is ordered to transmit or cause to be transmitted to the County Auditor of the County of Riverside, California (the *County*) before August 10, 1995, the property tax roll with such rates and charges enumerated for each parcel not exempt therefrom; and the County Auditor of the County is hereby designated,' required, empowered, authorized, instructed, directed and ordered to make collection of all such assessments as shown on that roll and to perform any and all duties necessary therefor. : Section 6. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, the levy and collection of these rates and charges is exempt from CEQA pursuant to Cnllfornia Public Resources Code Section 21080 (b)(8) and Section 15273 of the State Guidelines because. the rates and charges are necessary to maintain existing services within the TCSD. Section 7. The Secttory shall certify to the adoption of this Reso~. PASS~r}, APPRO~VED AND ADOPTRT} ~ __ day of ,19~. TEMBCULA COMMUNrI~ DISTRICT SERVICES ATTHST: Ronald H. Roberts, President June Greek, Secretary/City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITYOF~ ) ) ss ) I, June Greek, Secretary of the Temecula Community Services District, Ifl:~m:~Y DO CttgTl.~f that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the Board of ~ of the Temecula Community Services District on the day of ,1995, by the following roll call vote: AYES: DIRECTORS: NOES: DIRECTORS: DIRECTOPt: June ~, Secretary/City Clerk Rx'nrmTA PROJECT SUMMARY TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT On July 1, 1995, Municitnl F~.-c~n~ Services was retnlned by the City of Temecula to prepare the Annual Levy Repoxt for the Tomecult Community Services DisUict CICSD) for the Fiscal Year 1995-96. Pursuant to the Community Services District Law, Division 3 of Title 6 of the Government Code of the State of Cnlifornin, commencing with Section 61000 et llai~ the TCSD has the power to levy and collect rates and charges in tinier to catty on its operations and to provide the services and facilities furni,~hed by it. The levy and collection of the rates and charges is accompli.~hed by the assignment of '- benefit to each pan:el within a specific service level. A Service Level is a defined area that provides a specific service, operation and mnintemnnce and/or program to only those parcels contained within that service level. The TCSD is curren~y composed of six (6) city-wide service levels. of the service levels are as follows: The descriptions Commu!lity Services, l~d.rks and Ret:reafion. Operations, maintenance, and ndministration of the City community pal'k systems, recnntion facilities, services and programs. Service Level A - Arterial Street Li~ts and Median Maintenance. Operations, maintenance, utility costs, and ndmini.Cration of all arterial street lights, medians and traffic signals. Service Level B - l~idenHnl Street Lights. Operations, maintenance, utility costs and administration of all residential street Hghts. Service I ~vel C - Perimeter Landscaping and Slope Maintenance. Operations, maintenance, utility costs, improvements, and ndmini.~ration for all perimeter landscaping and slope maintenance areas maintained by the TCSD. Service Level D - Refuse. Collection. Recyclinr and Street Sweeping. Operations and admini.ctration of the refuse and recycling program, and street sweeping services for all single-family residential homes. Service Level R - Streets and Roads. Construction, installation, and maintenance ofstroetsandronds. r:.%y~mnml .,rot ~l~Lm96 The Financial Analysis contained herein contains each Service Level including with their totals for :Fiscal Year 1995-96 year to be as follows: SERVICE T.P3r!~- T,T:~IY BUDGET Community Services/hrks: Service Level A Service Level B Service Level C Service Level D $/SFR $2,611,856.00 $ 68.88 157,586.00 $ 4.16 244,170.00 $ 26.92 475,390.00 Variable 1.808.867.00 $172.06 TOTAL TCSD LEVY FY 95-96: $5,297,869.00 The Levy and Collection mounts for all non-exempt parcels within the TCSD for the Fiscal Year 1995-96 are as shown on the Assessment Roll on file with the City Clerk. .-. MFS CITY OF TEMECULA FINAL ANNUAL LEVY REPORT TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT FISCAL YEAR 1995/1996 SUBMITTED: MAY 30,1995 APPROVED: MUNI FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. Corporate Off/ce 28765 Single Oak Drive, Suite 200 Temecula. CA 92590 Tel: (909) 699-3990 Fax:. (909) 699-3460 Orange County Office 150 El Camino Real, Suite 120 Tustin, CA 92680 Tel: (714) 665.-~'~0 Fax: (714) 665-2230 San F. ranc/s¢o Office 3727 Buchanan, Suite 202 San Francisco. CA 94123 Tel: (415) 4414550 Fax: (415) 441-1401 ,gMFS TABLE OF CONTENTS I. OVERVIEW ............................................................._ ............ ....1 A. Introduction .................................................................................................1 B. DescripUon of the District and Services. ...................................................2 C. Budget and Levy Summary ........................................................................3 H. DESCRIPTION OF THE DISTRICT..m. ......... - ......................................................4 IT[. CHANGES TO ~ DISTRICT ......... . ...............................................................7 A. Modifications of the District Structur~ ..................................~ ....................7 · B. Annexations .................................................................................................7 C. District Budget Changes .............................................................................8 W. DISTRICT BUDGETS .................................- ............. ............., ....~ ....9 V. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT ..............................................................11 ,* APPENDIX A - 1AND USE/EQUIVALENT DWELLrNG UNITS ....................... 14 APPENDIX B - 1995/96 COLLECTION ROLl .......................................... .............15 MFS OVERVIEW Introduction The Temecula Community Services District (District) was formed in 1989 upon incorporation of the City of Temecula (City), to continue services previously provided by the County of Riverside(County). The boundary of the District is coterminous with the City boundary, and includes all taxable parcels within the City. The District collects special rates and charges in order to provide services and maintain the improvements within the District. The District was formed. and the rates and charges were set and established pursuant to Community Services. District Law 61000, Section 61621, T~e 6, Division 3 of the California Government Code (the Code). This Annual Levy Report (Report) describes the proposed rates and charges for Fiscal Year 1995/96 based on the historical and estimated cost to provide services, and maintain improvements, that provide a benefit to properties within the District. Each parcel charged receives direct benefit from the services provided to that parcel by the District. The word "parcel," for the purposes of this Report, refers to an individual property assigned its own Assessment Number by the Riverside County Assessor's Office. The Riverside County Auditor/Controller uses Assessment Numbers and specific Fund Numbers, to identify on the tax r611, properties charged for special district benefits. A Public Headng will be held before the District Board of Directors (Board). to allow the public an opportunity to hear and be heard regarding the District. Following the Public Headng, the Board may order modifications to the Report or confirm the Report as submitted. After approval of the Report, as submitted or as modified, the Board thereby approves and confirms the Rates and Charges (Charges) for Fiscal Year 1995/96, and shall order the levy and collection of Charges. In either case, the levy information will be submitted to the Riverside County Auditor/Controller to be included as Charges on the property tax roll for Fiscal Year 1995/96. gMFS Description of the District and Services The District provides certain services, and the maintenance of specific improvements within public rights-of-way and dedicated landscape easements throughout the City. The District consists of six (6) separate Service Levels, providing specffic services and benefit-to parcels within certain areas throughout the City. Each parcel within the District is grouped within two (2) or more Service Levels based upon its location, and the quantity and type of services provided within that area. Each Service Level has differing costs depending upon the various services and improvements' provided. All parcels identffied within a Service Level, share in both the cost and the benefits of the services. The costs associated with the' services, are equitably spread between all benefiting parcels within that Service Level. Each parcel is charged its fair share of the costs of the services in proportion to the estimated benefit received. The Service Levels are identified as follows: · Community Service, Parks and Recreation · Artedal Street Lighting and Medians · Residential Street Lighting · Local Landscaping and Slopes · Citywide Recycling and Refuse · .. Road Improvement and Maintenance Services and improvements provided the District includes: the construction and maintenance of community parks; .recreation programs; street lighting; median landscape maintenance; perimeter landscape maintenance; slope protection; a recycling and refuse collection program; and road improvement construction and maintenance. gMFS Budget and Levy Summary Table I below, provides a comparison of levy information for the various Service Levels within the District, comparing Fiscal Year 1995/96 to the previous Fiscal Year. TABLE I SERVICE LEVELS FICALYIAR Ughtrig 8rid Medians 155,358 4.18 Ligl~ng 216.186 26.30 Rae Lav~ # 1 (C-1) 40,710 40.00 Ra, Lava # 2 (C-2) 104,30~ 89.00 RamLa~#3(C-3) 113,796 116.00 Ram Lava # 4 (C~) 169,400 175.00 end Rehee 1,474.787 16936 ' RmeLevd#10q-~) 0 0.00 Ram L8~ · 2 (R,2) $0 $0.00 ,,,-t .,.I ,o..,I,,..,-.I ..,,,I 244,170 26.12 0.62 9,075 9.075 57,316 4L00 0.00 1246 1246 94,518 89.QQ 0.00 1,062 1,062 135256 116,QQ 0.00 1,166 1,166 135300 11S. QQ 0.00 1,076 1,076 1.808,867. t/2.0~ 2.70 10,513 10,513 14,765 ~ 1S1.QI 107.08 94.Q0 124 $4.633 121~ S121.92 35.lX) ~ Note: Due to rounding, the Total Levy Units (shown in this table) muftiplied by the Charge Per Unit may be different from the Total Levy Budget. Each Service Level provides different services, and is comprised of diffedng types of parcels. The 'Total Levy Units" and the resulting "Charge Per Levy Unit" (shown in Table I), reflect a method of apportionment that most fairly proportions the costs of the services to the benefit received by the parcels in that Service Level. For Community Services, Parks and Recreation, and Service Level A, levy units are calculated using a per Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). The'Total Levy Units" for Service Levels B, C, and D is based on a per parcel counL For Service Level R, levy units are .based on a Parcel Development Unit (PDU), which is similar to a per parcel count, but makes a distinction between developed and undeveloped parcels. Rates and charges will be collected in Service Level R for the first time in Fiscal Year 1995/96. For a more complete description of the methods used for calculating the 'Total Levy Units" used for each Service Level, please refer to (Section V), Method of Appoffionment and ;Appendix A. gMFS H. DESCRIPTION OF THE DISTRICT Community Services, Parks, and Recreation provides a benefit to all parcels within the District and includes maintenance, service, and operations of all public parks in the District.. Most park construction is provided either by developers as a condition of their residential projects or development impact fees. This Service Level also allows for the construction of the Community Recreation Center and its debt service. in addition, this Service Level provides funding for the vadous recreation programs throughout the City. City's parks and recreation facilities: · Rancho Califomia Sports Park · Sam Hicks Monument Park · Veterans Park · Bahia Vista Park · Temecula Middle School Fields · Old Town Temecula Senior Center The following is a list of some of the · · · · John Magee Park · Pala Community Park .,. · Paloma Del Sol Park Loma Linda Park Riverton Park Voorburg Park · Kent Hindergardt Memodal Park · Nakayama Park · Temecula Elementary School Pool · Nicolas Road Park · Butterfield Stage Park · Calle Amgon Park · Temecula Community Recreation Center Service Level A, Arterial Street Lighting and Medians provides a benefit to all parcels within the District and City through the servicing, operation, and maintenance of street lighting and landscaped medians along artedal streets. Service Level B, Residential Street Lighting provides a benefit to all single family residential and vacant parcels within those tram requiring servicing, operation, and maintenance of local street lighting. gMFS Service Level C, Perimeter Landscaping and Slopes provides the sewicing, operation, and maintenance of perimeter landscape areas and slopes within the public right of way and dedicated easements within certain tracts.' The level of maintenance required within these tracts varies depending on operating costs, and therefore four (4) rote levels have been established. Table II shows a listing of the tram in each of the four (4) rate levels within Service Level C (Local Landscaping and Slopes.) TABLE II Service Level C Tram FIANCH0mQHLAN06 """"%' I' · ' l:'.. .. Tra~llme Tinelf 22148-00 MM~NQtl 2312800 I, mcl.!y llrAll8 2~04-01 20/'35-0/~ 18~18-00 MEADOWVlW 2178~-00 2073508 1851801 S.aNt'TS8~ 20882-00 207354)0 185184)2 208824)1 217844)0 vefreHnJ. s 227154)0 20882-03 "20130-04 227164)2 216/34)0 21340-00 2291S4)0 - 216/3-03 213404)1 22915-01 216744)0 21340-02 22915-02 21674-01 21340-03 229154)3 21674432 21340-04 22916.40 216/44)3 21340-05 22916-01 216/54)0 218754)5 Service Level D, Citywide Recycling and Street Sweeping provides for the operation and administration of the refuse and recycling program and street sweeping services for all single family residential homes within the DistdcL $MFS Service .Level R, Roads provides funding for construction, improvement, service and maintenance of public streets and .roads throughout the City. The services provided may include, but are not limited to: renovation or restoretion due to damage; flood and drainage control; repairs and re-grading; and upgrades of the existing areas as required for unpaved roads. Service Level R was added to the District in Fiscal Year 1993/94. All parcels identified within Service Level R, share in both the cost and the benefits of the services provided. The costs associated with the services, are equitably spread between all bene~ting parcels within vadous areas (rate levels) of the Service Level. Each parcel is charged its fair share of the costs of the services in proportion to the estimated benefit received. In Fiscal Year 1995/96, two (2) areas of the City and the parcels in those areas have been added to Service Level R. The level of maintenance required within these two (2) areas vary due to operating costs, and therefore separate rate levels have been established. Only the parcels within each of the two (2) boundary areas will be charged for the costs associated with servicing and 'maintaining the roads and streets in 'the area. Ra~ Level R-1 The parcels within this rate level consists of one hundred twenty- four (124) parcels that have direct access to roads or streets that are serviced and maintained through the District. This rate level provides funding for servicing and maintenance o~ Nicolas Road; Greenwood Lane; Liefor Road; Gatlin Road; Pala Vista; Calle Girasol; Aussie Road; Calle Chapos; Walcott Road; and Tommy Lane. A total of 3.196 miles of roads are serviced and maintained in this area. Rate Level' R-2 The parcels within this rate level consists of fifty-nine (59) parcels that have direct access to roads or streets that are serviced and maintained through the District. This rate level provides funding for servicing and maintenance of:. Ormsby Road; Santiago Road; Lolita Road; and John Wamer Road. A total of.1.003 miles of roads are serviced and maintained in this area. $MFS CHANGES TO THE DISTRICT For Fiscal Year 1995/96, changes within the District that affect the levy are outlined below. All Modffications of the District Structure, Modffications to the District structure, if any, could include, but are not limited to: changes in the types of services provided; addition of now services or SerVice Levels; mstructudng of the current Service Levels; or revisions in the method of apportionment. No changes am anticipated to the. District structure for this Fiscal Year. .. Two (2) project areas (into levels) am being added to Service Level R for Fiscal Year 1995/96. The new rate levels within Servici; Level R will provide funding for the servicing and maintenance of unpaved roads. Only the parcels within each of the two (2) boundary areas will be charged for the costs associated with servicing and maintaining the roads and streets in the area. Annexations Annexations to Service Level B (Residential Street Lighting), am the parcels within Tracts: 22762-00 23125-01 24133-00 22916-03 23483-00 24135-00 23100-03 24131-01 24135-02 23101-02 24131-02 Annexations to Service Level C (Local Landscaping and Slopes), am the parcels within the following tracts: · Rate level #1 -Tract 22762-00 (Rancho Highlands). · Rate level #2 - Tract 22148-00 (Moralson Homes). · Rate level # 3 - Tracts 22916-00, 22916-01 and 22916-02 (Vintage Hills) · Rate level # 4 - Tracts 21675-00 (Village Grove); Tract 25004-01 (Barnlay Estates). 7 MFS Annexations to Service Level D (Citywide Recycling and Street Sweeping): A total of 1,805 parcels have been added to Service Level D for' the 1995/96 Fiscal Year. Annexations to Service Level R (Roads) include: · One hundred twenty-four (124) parcels to rate level #1 · Fifty-nine (59) parcels to rate level ~ No other annexations are planned to any of the other' Service Levels or to the Distdct for Fiscal Year 1995/96. District Budget Changes The Community Services, Parks and Recreation Service Level rates have increased due to the operations and maintenance costs of the Temecula Community Recreation Center, and the Old Town Temecula Senior Center, as well as expansion and improvements to several neighborhood and community parks. Operations and energy costs for Service Levels A (Arterial Street Lights) have increased over the previous year. However, the increased cost has been off-set by an increase in the EDU count for the Service Level. In Service Level B (Residential Street Lighting), the number of parcels receiving beneft has also increased, but due to increased energy costs, there will be a small increase to the rate per parcel. Service Level D (Recycling and Refuse), has increased due to an increase in the Consumer Pdce Index (CPI). 8 ..g. MFS DISTRICT BUDGETS Table III on the next two (2) pages show the District budget for Fiscal Year TABLE III 1995/96 DISTRICT BUDGET 1995/96. Temecula Community Services District Operating Budget Department Summary for the Year Ending June 30, 1996 PERIONIE~IEtVICIS SelBna 8ml Wagee 5100 S76.518 15.789 DeMemd ~ 5101 0 0 leERS i 5102 86.0~5 2,513 SIeleU,. ,,A,.,~_'tl 5103 0 0 Meeimm FICA 5104 8,285 242 AueAleeenm 5108 2,400 0 U~ lt~k,,..._aTmiingTet 510e 5,082 Dkellily ~ 5110 0 0 WoeemCk..l~, % 5112 20.~88 1.136 Neeit kle'mlee 5113 ~.198 2.846 iT'ewe ~Rqecl) 5119 2~3.g24 0 baxmal (Pesemel Serums) $1,016.450 OPERA TIONI AND MNNTENANCE Tm ~enm:e (Celullll 5208 4.500 0 Reinelf & Meet - Fedilee 5212 129.500 0 Rler&~ 'j,, Vlt,;,A 5214 12.000 0 Reeer · MemL4)llkae Ee 5211 0 0 Meemnence i 5218 0 Oek:e 8elmlee 52~ 15,000 0 r~'---:,v 5222 33.000 0 Legal I),amwlmNms 5224 1.000 0 DueeetdMemxeWWe 5226 Z000 0 Pulk2eens 5228 S)0 0 PmegeemlPeck.v.~ 5230 9.500 0 Renl -Fm 5234 3.522 0 Renl - ExNBme~ 5238 12.000 0 Eeamnem Leeee e-j.m 2.(X30 0 Smel emeEelummem 5242 7.{1)0 500 Uneeee 5243 ~ 0 $igne 5244 10,{I)0 0 01Mr C)uls~a Semca 5250 51.800 0 Aeemaing 5254 4.000 0 PuMcNalcm 5256 6.rr~ 0 ~ 5258 7.700 0 Slae Tranngr:clucBan 5281 5,000 0 Milage 5262 3.000 0 Fual E.,memB-C~ Vencla S2~3 7.000 1.000 Caunal Disamata~ S267 5.000 0 Biuecnnm S268 500 0 Sua~ml {S2QO'm ~.~/2 S10,000 18.515 53.973 17.310 0 882.105 0 0 0 0 0 2.78B 8J28 0 O 11)0.285 0 0 0 0 0 288 851 0 0 6.6&4 0 0 0 0 2.400 28/ 445 0 0 5,943 0 0 0 0 '0 1N 1.717 0 0 23.1e7 5,880 9,114 O O 110,838 0 15,630 0 0 306.5~4 127.8~5 1~0.688 S17,310 10 11,244,778 0 O 0 0 4.500 0 47.886 0 0 1T7.388 0 0 0 0 12,(X)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 15,000 0 0 0 0 33.1)00 0 0 0 0 1.000 0 0 0 0 2,000 0 0 O 0 500 0 0 0 0 6.500 0 0 0 0 3~22 0 0 0 0 12,000 0 0 0 0 2,000 0 86.045 0 0 · 37t.1~ 0 0 0 0 7.500 0 0 0 0 5.2Q0 0 0 0 0 10.0133 0 0 0 0 20.1330 0 20.000 0 0 71~00 0 0 1.500 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 T.700 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.000 0 0 0 0 8.000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 500 $0 SlS3.g11 . Sl.S00 I0 1801,283 ggMFS TABLE ill 1995/96 DISTRICT BUDGET . Temecula Community Services District Operating Budget Department Summary for the Year Ending June 30, 1996 Gml~ Lev!lA Levdl- LevdC.- OPErAlIONS AND MAllTIME Recnmion M $301 1N,4Se O 0 M Hmzkng 5315 0 O 0 · Sirel Ugflng 5319 0 126.80D 23/.500 meurmm $330 SZ2~I VMY, elee ~ 8.189 O O Inlemmdon $ymoms $340 38,e93 O FIGk ~ 41J00 · 0 0 Aaaeeamee EnOi~ $370 ~0,000 O 0 ReNnd~Pet:tYem',s-- ,,_,A 63/5 O O 0 City Admin Chingee s3eo 182.000 0 o $uelmms (s300'N 1633,967 1126,800 Op~E,~etns 5400 0 0 O 0 ~needMek'aeanee 5402 0 0 O 0 a Me 5415 421.640 15,000 0 2/3,e9~ a Rehebileloe 5416 0 0 0 23,111 Suitingis (5400's) 1421,840 llS,000 IO $302,098 Otherl ~00 .0 0 0 0 Chiming Traneaa Out S901 502,415 0 0 0 SUBTOTAL (Oilmr Exlmra:Munm) ~;02.41S CAPTTAL OUTLAY Oliae ~ 5601 1,000 0 0 Oillm EQumnmnt M(~ 1.000 0 0 VmiOmm 9809 0 0 0 Eque~ M¶0 4,500 0 0 CIP - Pmn M04 0 0 0 SUBTOTAL (CalMal Oueef) 1,500 I0 $3 EXPENDITURES RESERVE FOR CONTINGENCY TOTAL DISTRICT COSTS TOTAL EXPENDITURE8 REVENUE~ OTHER REVENUE SOURCES FUND 8AI.ANCE TOTAL REVENUee 'LevdR TiM ltlk O O O 154.45e 0 1,838,44/ O 1,838.&47 O o O 3S4J00 o 0 O 52.2S8 o o o 8,1e9 3,~05 3,500 o s2,/98 o o o 1t411 0 O O 41,~00 0 0 0 20.000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 162.000 18,10S S'I,541,N/ 10 ILTS0.51e 0 liJee 11S,B35 23,171 ftStl04 O 502,415 le02.415 0 'O O 0 O O O 0 O 0 O ' O 0 0 O 18 10 18 $3.188.544 $114.255 S267.89S $554.748 $1.880./S'/ S19.398 1.000 1.000 O (8OO , 0 18,800 $3.063,597 O O 0 0 O O 0 3,186.544 174.255 267.815 554.748 1,880.7S'/ 19,39~ 3,063.507 $3.18e.544 8174.255 $36/,895 S~.rd.748 S1.~7~ 119.~ ~7 ~.1~ 1174~ S I MFS METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT As in past years, the cost to provide services within the District will be fairly distributed among each assessable property based upon the estimated benefit received by each property. The benefit formula used is based upon the Service Level, the land use and size of a property. For the Community Services, Parks, and Recreation Service Level; and SeWice Level A (Arterial Street Lighting and Medians); each property is assigned an Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU) factor that reflects the property's land use and degree of benefit. For Service Level B (Residential Street Lighting); Service Level C (Local Landscaping and Slopes); and Service Level D (Recycling and Refuse); the rates and charges am calculated on a perparcel basis. In Service Level R (Roads) each property is assigned a Parcel Development Unit (PDU) factor that reflects both parcel count and whether the parcel is developed. :l'he following is the formula used to calculate each property's District charges by EDU. Please refer to Appendix A for a complete listing of land use codes and their associated EDU. .. Community Services, Parks and Recreation Service Level; and Service Level A (Arterial Street Lighting and Medians): Parcel EDU X Acres or Unita X Charge per EDU = Parcel Charge The following is the formula used to calculate each property's District charges by the per parcel method. · - Service Level B (Residential Street Lighting); Service Level C (Local Landscaping and Slopes); and Service Level D (Citywide Recycling and Refuse): Toll Balance to Levy / Total Parcels (in Service Level) = Parcel Charge The Rate Per Levy Unit for Service Level R is based on a Parcel Development Unit (PDU), which is similar to a per parcel charge, but makes a distinction between developed and undeveloped parcels. Service Level R (Roads): Parcel Development Units = 1.0 for Developed Parcels Parcel Development Units = 0.5 for Undeveloped Parcels Total Balance to Levy / Total Parcel PDU (in rate Level) = Parcel Charge . MFS Table IV shown on the next two pages, reflects the levy calculations for various property types for each Service Level. TABLE IV PARCEL CHARGE CALCULATIONS FOR COMMUNITY SERVICES, PARKS, AND RECREATION Property Type Single Family Residential Multi Family Residential Agricultural Single Family Vacant Non-Residentlel Vacant Non-Residential Improved Parcel X I Charge: .. I C perEDU 1.o01.8.68 I -6--I Per i 0.75 o.,oI---i."-"1 4.00 68.88 275.52 Per Acre 6.00 $68.88 $4132.8 Per Acre PARCEL CHARGE CALCULATIONS FOR SERVICE LEVEL A ' -- '; EDU: '':' X perEDU' =. 'Charge · -~ Multiplier Single Family Residential 1.00 $4.16 $4.16 Per Unit Multi Family Residential 0.75 4.16 3.12 Per Unit Agricultural 0.50 4.16 2.08 Per Acre Single Family Vacant 2.00 4.16 8.32 Per Acre Non"Residential Vacant' 4.00 4.16 16.64 Per Acre Non-Residential Improved 6.00 $4.16 $24.96 Per Acre PARCEL CHARGE CALCULATIONS FOR SERVICE LEVEL B Property Type Single Family Residential Single Family Vacam Pamel. Charge- Parcel ' Unit X per Pamel - Cha~e. Multiplier 1.00 $26.92 $26.92 Per Pamet 1.00 $26.92 $26,92 Per Parcel 12 '?;: tMFS TABLE N PARCEL CHARGE CALCULATIONS FOR SERVICE LEVEL C Property Type Single Family Residential Rate C-1 Single Family Residentil Rate C-2 Single Family Residential Rate C-3 Single Family Residentil Rate C-4 Parcel. 'Unit 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Chinlie: broil . '; X per Fame!,= w. Ch, rg~, : Muffi~br ~.00 ~.~ Pe ~1. 89.~ 89.00 P~ P~ 116.~ 116.~ P~ P~ $175.~ $175.~ Per ~ PARCEL CHARGE CALCULATIONS FOR SERVICE LEVEL D Property Type Single Family Residential · Unit- X per Parelk-: 1.00 $172.06 Charge;.. $172.06 Multiprier' Per Parcel PARCEL CHARGE CALCULATIONS FOR SERVICE LEVEL R Single Family Residential Rate R-1 Single Family Vacant Rate R-1 Single Family Residential Rate R-2 Single Family Vacant Rate R-2 'Parcel~ Charge: Unit X per Unit 1.00 $157.08 0,50 157.08 1.00 121.92 0.50 $121.92 Charge. $157.08 78.54 121.92 $60.96 Multiplier Per Parcel Per Parcel Per Parcel Per Parcel $MFS Appendix A - LAND USE/EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS Property Type Single Family Residential Multi Family Residential Agricultural Single Family Vacant Non-Residential Vacant - Non-Residential Improved 1995/96 Equivalent Dwelling-Units'Multiplier 1.00 Units 0.75 Units 0.50 Acres 2.00 Acres 4.00 Acres 6.00 Acres 14 $ MFS Appendix B - 1995/96 COLLECTION ROLL Parcel identification, for each lot or parcel within the District, shall be the pamel as shown on the County Assessor's map for the year in which this report is prepared. Non-assessable lots or parcels include govemment owned land, public utility owned property, and land principally encumbered with public rights-of-way. . A listing of parcels within this District, along with the charges, has been submitted to the City Clerk and, by reference, is made part of this report. 15 ITEM 3 APPRO~ CITY ATTORNEY ' RNANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: Board of Directors FROM: Ronald E. Bradley, General Manager DATE: SUBJECT: June 13, 1995 Service Level R - Proposed Rates and Charges for Fiscal Year 1995-1996 .- PREPARED BY: ~,~ RECOMMENDATION: ~('Beryl Yasinosky, Management Assistant That the Board of Directors: Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. CSD 95- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ADOPTING RATES AND CHARGES FOR STREET AND ROAD IMPROVEMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1996-1996. BACKGROUND: On June 22, 1993, the Board of Directors established a new benefit zone entitled Service Level R to provide for the construction, installation and maintenance of streets and roads. -Although the boundaries of Service Level R are coterminous with the City boundaries, no rates and charges have been levied to date. However, beginning in Fiscal Year 1995-96, Service Level R proposes to provide funding for emergency maintenance and grading of certain unpaved roads within the City that are washed out during rain storms. Two (2) boundary areas and the parcels within those areas are proposed to be added to Service Level R. Additionally, the level of maintenance required varies within each of the two (2) boundary areas and therefore, two (2) rate levels are proposed. Rate Level #1, located in the Nicolas Road area, will provide for the funding and servicing of 3.196 miles of unpaved roadways that currently provide access to one hundred twenty-four (124) parcels within this boundary area. The proposed rate and charge is $157.08 for an improved parcel and $78.54 for a vacant parcel. A boundary map for Rate Level #1 is attached for your review. Rate Level #2, located in the Santiago Road area, will provide for the funding and servicing of 1.003 miles of unpaved roadways that currently provide access to fifty-nine (59) parcels within this boundary area, The proposed rate and charge is $121.92for an improved parcel and $60.96 for a vacant parcel. A boundary map for Rate Level #2 is attached for your review. All parcels identified within Service Level R share in the costs and benefits of the services provided. Only those parcels that have direct access to the roadways within each boundary area will be charged for the respective maintenance costs. The levy and collection the TCSD Rates and Charges is exempt from the provisions of:the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 21080 (b)(8) of the California Public Resources Code and Section 15273 of the State Guidelines because the rates and charges are necessary to maintain existing services within the TCSD. FISCAL IMPACT: The revenue generated from Service Level Rfor Fiscal Year 1995- 96 will provide funding for emergency road maintenance and grading of unpaved roads within the City of Temecula. ATTACH M ENTS: Resolution No, CSD 95- adopting the TCSD Rates and Charges for Fiscal Year 1995-96. Final Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 1995-1996. Boundary Maps. "' RESOL~ON NO. A RESOLU~ON OF ~ BOARD OF DIRECrO~ OF TNNECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ADOPTING RATES AND CHARGES FOR STREET AND ROAD ]MPRO~ FOR FISCAL YEAR 199S-96. WHERK~, upon hcoqxn-ation ofthe City of Temecula, California (the "Ci~") effective December 1, 1989, voters also approved the foxmarion of the Temecula Community SerVices Dist~a ("TCSD"), which has the same area and bovnd~ries as the City and whose Board of Directors (the "Board') consists of the members of the City Council of the City; and WHEREAS, the TCSD proposes to conthue such rates and charges for community services and parks, recreation ~cillties, sewices and progrsms, operation, maintenance, service and odminis,~ration of street lighting, slope m3inte~=nce, recycling and refilse collection and street and road improvements (the "Services and/or Facilities") for those areas specifially benefitted thereby and charges by the county sa'vice areas or the TCSD for such services in prior fiscal years; and WtmREAS, the Board has requested the preparation of a nlxm for Fiscal Year 1995-96 contsaining the proposed rates and charges for fiHn~ with the Secremxy of the TCSD pursuant to the Community Services DisIlia Law being Division 3 of Title 6 of the Government Code Of the State of Cnlifornia, commencing with Soction 61000 (the 'Act'); and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 61621.2 of the Act, an Engineer's Report for Collection for the Fiscal Year 1995-96 (the "Report") had been presented and filed with the S~'nnry of the TCSD which contains a description of the proposed Sexyices and/or Facilities to be provided and the proposed rates and charges for such Services and/or Facilities, and a description of the parcels subject to the rates and charges. The Report is based upon a budget adopted by the Board for the proposed Services and/or Facilities for specific areas where such Services and/or Facilities are pwvided, including necessary staff and odmini,~erative expenses; and ~, the Board requested that staff pwvide mailed notice of the public hearing regarding these rates and charges to each property owner subject to the rates and charges at least fourteen (14) days prior to the date set for the public hearing; and Wm~REAS, notice of the public hearing was mailed and published as required by law and the affidavits of publication and mailing are on file with the Secretary; and WImREAS, at the public hearing conducted on June 13, 1995, as noticed, the TCSD heard and considered all oral and written protests and comments by any interested person concerning the proposed rates and charges or the method of their collection; and WHEREAS, the TCSD further finds that based on the Report and budget, the rates and clm---Ees as set out on ~Yhihit *A* are the zeasonable cog of the Services and/or Fac~es W be provided by the TCSD for Fiscal Year 1995-96; and WHEREAS, the TCSD proposes to collect the rates and charges at the same time, in the same manner, by the same persons and together with and not seps~tely from, rise property taxes collected within the TCSD. These rate8 a/K[ cila/gos shall be dO]iDqtiODt at the same time and thereafter be subject to the same delinquency penalties as.. such pwpeny taxes. AH laws applicable to the levy, collection, and enforcement of ptopaty taxes, including, but not limited to, those pertaining to the matters of delinquency, correction, :cancellation, refund and redemption, arc applicable to these rates and charges, except for Cnllfornia Revenue and Taxation Code Section 4831. However, if for the first year the chat~ is levied, the real property to which the charge rehtes has been trnn~erred or conveyed to a bona fide purchaser for value, or ff a lien of a bona fide encumbranccr for value has been created and attaches thereon, prior to the date on which the first instnllment of such taxes appear on the roll, then the charge, or the delinquency in that charge, assessed pursuant to this section shall not restfit in a lien against the property, but instead shall be transfen'ed to the unseaLred roll for collection; NOW, '13T!:~Ks:~ORE, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT DOES 14'n~:~aY, RBSOLVE, DETER_MINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The rates and charges for Fiscal Year 1995-96 as set out on Exhibit "A" for the Services and/or Facilities are adopted for Fiscal Year 1995-96. Section 2. The TCSD shall collect such rates and charges at the same time, in the same mnnner, by the .~me persons and together with and not separately from, the property taxes collected within the TCSD. These rates and chnrges shall be delinquent at the ~me time and thereafter be subject to the same delinquency penalties as such property taxes. All hws applicable to the levy, collection, and enforcement of property taxes, including, but not limited to, those pertaining to the matten of delinquency, correction, cancellation, ~fund and redemption, are applicable to these rates and charges, except for C~lifomia Revenue and Taxation Code Section 4831. However, if for the first year the charge is levied, the real property W which the charge rehtes has been Wanderted or conveyed to a bona fide purchaser for value, or if a lien of a bona fide encumbrancer for value has been created and attaches thereon, prior to the date on which the first insUdlment of such taxes appear on the wH, then the charge, or the delinquency in that charge, assessed pursuant to this section shall not result in a lien against the property, but instead shall be Wanderred to the unsea=ed roll for collection. Section 3. If a prolx~ty owner subject to these rates and charges cha.e~ges or questions the levy of the rates and charges to such prolz~ty ownor's p:ol, c~, such l~t.~ty owner must appeal the levy by filing an appeal with the TCSD Secretary bdore 5:00 p.m. on Decembex 1, 1995, pursuant to procedures estabMshexl by tho TCSD. Section 4. If a property owner subject to these rates and charges believes that payment of the rates and charges for fiscal year 1995-96 would create a hardship forthat pmI~ny owner during that fiscal year, such ~ owner must appcal the levy by filing a hardship appe~ with the TCSD Secreta~ before 5:00 p.m. on ~be~r 1, 1995, pursuant to procedures established by the TCSD, in order to be considered under the hardship appeal program..- Section 5. The TCSD Secretary is ordered to transmit or cause to be tran~nitted to the County Auditor of th~ County of Rivorside, California (the *County') before August 10, 1995, the property tax roll with such rates and charges enumented for each parcel not exempt '- therefrom; and the County Auditor of the County is hereby designated, required, empowered, authorized, instructed, directed and ordered to make collection of all such assessments as shown on that roll and to perform any and all duties necessary therefor. Section 6. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, the levy and collection of these rates and charges is exempt from CEQA pursuant to California Public Reso~ Code Section 21080 0>)(8) and Section 15273 of the State Guidelines because the rates and charges are nece~ to maintain existing services within the TCSD. Section 7. The Secretary shah certify to the adoption of thig Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this__ day of ,1995. TEIVlECULA COIVlMUNITY SERVICE DISTRICT ATTEST: Ronald H. Roberts, President June Greek, Secretary/City Clerk [SEAL] r:Ayminobkx. tutmml .cad -3- 061395 STAT~ OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITYOFT!~!Lr'UI~ ) ) ss ) I, Jtme Greek, $ecreUtry of the Temecula Community Services DisUict, l:tERPm~y DO UliK'IXk'~' that the f~ Resolution was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the Board of Dixecton of the Temecula Community Services District on the day of ,1995, by the following ton call vote: .- AYES: DIRK"rORS: NOES: DIRECTORS: ABSENT: DIRECTORS: Jtme Greek, Secretary/City Clerk wx'l~mrrA PROJECT SUMMARY T~IECULA COMMUNITY SERVICF.,~ DISTRICT On July 1, 1995, M~micil~l Finsncisl Services was _x~ined by the City of Temecula to prepare the Annual Levy ~ for the Temecula Community Services Dish-ict CrCSD) for the Fiscal Year 1995-96. Punuaut to the Community Senvices District Law, Division 3 of Title 6 of the Government Code of the State of CJliforllia, commencing with Section 61000 et l~!l,,= the TCSD has the power to levy and collect rates and charges in ord~ to carry on its operations and to provide the services and facilities furnished by it. The levy and collection of the rates and charges is accomplished by the s-~signment of benefit to each parcel within a specific sexvice level. A Service Level is a defined area that provides a specific service, operation and maintenance and]or prograin tO Only those parcels contained within that service level. The TCSD is curren~y composed of six (6) city-wide service levels. of the service levels are as follows: Community Services. ~ and Recreation. Operations, maintenance, and a(imini.Cration of the City community park systems, recreation facilities, services and programs. Service Level A - Arterial Street Lights and Median Maintenance. Operations, maintenance, utility costs, and administration of all arterial street lights, medians and traffic signals. Service Level B - Residential Street T-i~hts. Operations, maintenance, utility costs and admini.Cration of all residential street lights. Service Level C - Perimeter Landscaping and Slope Maintenance. Operations, maintenance, utility costs, improvements, and admini.cwation for all perimeter landscaping and slope maintenance areas maintained by the TCSD. Service Level D - Refuse. Collection. Recycling and Street Sweq~ing. Operations and admini.qration of the rduse and recycling program, and street sweeping services for all single-family residential homes. Service Level R - Streets and Roads. Construction, installation, and Inaintenance ofmemand roads. The Financial Analysis contnined heroin CODtnin.~ Service Level R totnix for Fiscal Year 1995-96 year to be as follows: s~,vIcrp- T.RVI~. R T.~V'Y BUDGVtT Service Level R TOTAL T-~NY FY 95-96: $19,398.00 $19,398.00 $/SFR Vadab~c The Levy and Colioc~on mounts for all non-oxompt parcoB within TCSD 5crvice Level R for the Fiscal Year 1995-96 are as shown on the Assessment Roll on ~l~ with the City Clerk. MFS CITY OF TEMECULA FINAL ANNUAL LEVY REPORT TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT FISCAL YEAR 1995/'1996 SUBMI'R'ED: MAY 30,1995 APPROVED: MUNI FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. Corporate Office 28765 Single Oak Drive, Suite 200 Temeaala. CA 92590 Tel: (909) 699-3990 Fax: (909) 699-3460 Orange County Office 150 El Camino Real, Suite 120 Tustin, CA 92680 Tel: (714) 665-~??0 Fax: (714) 665-2230 San Francice ice 3727 Buchanan, Suite 202 San Francisco, CA 94123 Tel: (415) 4414550 Fax: (415) 441-1401 gMFS TABLE OF CONTENTS L OVERVIEW ............................................................................. 1 A. Introduction ................................................................................................. B. Description of the District and Service~ ...................................................2 C. Budget and Levy Summary ........................................................................3 II. DESCRIPTION OF THE DISTRICT ..... ; ....................................................4 rfl. CRANGES TO TMF~ DL.qTRI~ ........................................................................._. .......7 ,% A. Modifications of ths District $tructur~ .......................................................7 B. Annexations .................................................................................................7 C. District Budget Changes ............ . ............;..:.;~. ............................................8 IV. DISTRICT BUDGETS...:: .......................... · ................................... ....'-. ....9 V. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT .................................... --~ .................- ........11 APPENDIX A - LAND USE/EQUIVALENT DWET,t,ING UNITs ................... 14 APPENDIX B - 1995/96 COLLECTION ROLL ........................................................ 15 ggMFS OVERVIEW Introductjon The Temecula Community Services District (District) was formed in 1989 upon incorporation of the City of Temecula (City), to continue services previously provided by the County of Riverside (County). The boundary of the District is coterminous with the City boundary, and"includes all taxable parcels within the City. The District collects special rates and charges in order to provide services and maintain the improvements within the District. The District was formed, and the rates and charges were set and established pursuant to Community Services District Law 61000, Section 61621, T~e 6, Division 3 of the California' Government Code (the Code). This Annual Levy Report (Report) describes the proposed rates and charges for Fiscal Year 1995196 based on the historical and estimated cost to provide services, and maintain improvements, that provide a benefit to properties within the District. Each parcel charged receives direct benefit from the services provided to that parcel by the District. The word "parcel," for the purposes of this Report, refers to an individual property assigned its own Assessment Number by the Riverside County Assessors Office. The Riverside County Auditor/Controller uses Assessment Numbers and specific Fund Numbers, to identify on the tax roll, properties charged for special district benefits. A Public Headng will be held before the District Board of Directors (Board), to allow the public an opportunity to hear and be heard regarding the District. Following the Public Headng, the Board may order modifications to the Report or confirm the Report as submitted. After approval of the Report, as submitted or as modffied, the Board thereby approves and confirms the Rates and Charges (Charges) for Fiscal Year 1995/96, and shall order the levy and collection of Charges. In either case, the levy information will be submitted to the Riverside County Auditor/Controller to be included as Charges on the property tax roll for Fiscal Year 1995196. 1 gMFS Description of the District and Services The District provides certain services, and the maintenance of specific improvements within public rights-of-way and dedicated landscape easements throughout the City. The District consists of six (6) separate Service Levels, providing specific services and benefit .to parcels within certain areas throughout the City. Each parcel within the District is grouped within two (2) or more Service Levels based upon its location, and the quantity and type of services provided within that area. Each Service Level has differing costs depending upon the vadous services and improvements'provided. All parcels identified within a Service Level, share in both the cost and the benefits of the services. The costs associated with the' services, are equitably spread between all benefiting parcels within that Service Level. Each parcel is charged its fair share of the costs of the services in proportion to the estimated benefit received. The Service Levels are identified as follows: · Community Service, Parks and Recreation · Artedal Street Ughting and Medians · Residential Street Ughting · Local Landscaping and Slopes · Citywide Recycling and Refuse · .. Road Improvement and Maintenance Services and improvements provided the District includes: the construction and maintenance of community parks; recreation programs; street lighting; median landscape maintenance; perimeter landscape maintenance; slope protection; a recycling and refuse collection program; and read improvement construction and maintenance. MFS Budget and Levy Summary Table I below, provides a comparison of levy information for the vadous Service Levels within the District, comparing Fiscal Year 1995/96 to the previous Fiscal Year, : TABLE I SERVICE LEVELS 81gIVICILIVIL UgNing end Meciee 155,358 4.18 . ,.Sen~eLavelBReeklenilSImet LieNme 216,186 26.30 Ree taei · 1 (C,-1) 40,710 40.00 57,316 Ram Leva · 2 (C-2) 104,308 89.00 94,518 emeLave·3(C-3) 113,796 116.00 135,256 Rae Level ·4 (C-4) 169,400 17500 188,300 Smvk~LaveiDCitleekleRecycling me Refuee 1,474,787 169.35 1,508,867 SenmeLavelRRem · .RmeLevdll (!1-1) 0 0.00 14,765 Ram Lave · 2 (R-2) $0 50.1X $4,633 ~_ .. the Be#Be- __ue-._ ........~ Uaee- Peme,r. $2,506,773 $67.50 $2,611,856 $ILM $1.38 37,916.58 14,717 157,586 4.18 (0.02) 37,916.58 14,717 244,170 2~___a9_ 0.62 9,075 9,075 : 4tl)0 0J)0 1240 1240 M 0.00 1,962 1,062 116J0 0.00 1,155 1,165 175,00 0.00 1,076 1,076 1/2.0~ 2.70 10,513 10,513 157.08 157.08 94.00 124 121.12 S121.g2 35.50 50 Note: Due to rounding, the Total Levy Units (shown in this table) multiplied by the Chmge Per Unit may be different from the Total Levy Budget. Each Service Level provides different services, and is comprised of differing types of parcels. The "Total Levy Units" and the resulting "Charge Per Levy Unit" (shown in Table I), reflect a method of apportionment that most fairly proportions the costs of the services to the benefit received by the parcels in that Service Level. For Community Services, Parks and Recreation, and Service Level A, levy units are calculated using a per Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). The"Total Levy Units" for Service Levels B, C, and D is based on a per parcel count. For Service Level R, levy units are .based on a Parcel Development Unit (PDU), which is similar to a per pamel count, but makes a distinction between developed and undeveloped parcels. Rates and charges will be collected in Service Level R for the first time in Fiscal Year 1995/96. For a more complete description of the methods used for calculating the "Total Levy Units" used for each Service Level, please refer to (Section %/), Method of Apportionment and ;Appendix A. $MFS He DESCRIPTION OF THE DISTRICT Community Services, Parks, and Recreation provides a benefit to all parcels within the District and includes maintenance, service, and operations of all public parks in the District. Most park construction is provided either by developers as a condition of their residential projects or development impact fees. This Service Level also allows for the construction of the Community Recreation Center and its debt service. In addition, this Service Level provides funding for the various recreation programs throughout the City. City's parks and recreation facilities: · Rancho Califomia Sports Park · · Sam Hicks Monument Park · · Veterans Park · · Bahia Vista Park · · Temecu la Middle School Fields · · Old Town Temecula Senior Center · The following is a list of some of the Paloma Del Sol Park Loma Linda Park Riverton Park John Magee Park Pala Community Park .-. Voorburg Park · Kent Hindergardt Memodal Park · Nakayama Park · Temecula Elementary School Pool · Nicolas Road Park · Butterfield Stage Park · Calle Amgon Park · Temecula Community Recreation Center Service Level A, Arterial Street LighUng and Medians provides a benefit to all parcels within the District and City through the servicing, operation, and maintenance of street lighting and landscaped medians along artedal streets. Service Level B, Residential Street Lighting provides a benefit to all single family residential and vacant parcels within those tram requiring servidng, operation, and maintenance of local street lighting. 4 MFS Service Level C, Perimeter Landscaping and Slopes provides the servicing, operation, and maintenance of ladmeter landscaped areas and slopes within the public right of way and dedicated easements within certain tracts. The level of maintenance required within these tram varies depending on operating costs, and therefore four (4) rate levels have been established. Table II shows a listing of the tram in each of the four (4) rote levels within Service Level C (Local Landscaping and Slopes.) TABLE II Service Level C Tracts TnaitNmm~ Tra~t RANCNOI ~ 20130-05 22716-03 225rJ-00 2134(N)0 208794)0 21340-03 22915-03 208794)1 21340-04 22916.00 21340-05 22918-01 21340-07 'l,G,O~.,'r, ea~a COUNTIW 21561-00 218/4-02 216/',1-03 216/5-00 216/5-01 -21675-02 21675-03 21875-04 21875-0S Service Level D, Citywide Recycling and Street Sweeping provides for the operation and administration of the refuse and recycling program and street sweeping services for all single family residential homes within the District. $1MFS Service Level R, Roads 'provides funding for construction, improvement, service and maintenance of public streets and roads throughout the City. The services provided may include, but are not limited to: renovation or restoration due to damage; flood and drainage control; repairs and re-grading; and upgrades of the existing areas as required for unpaved roads. Service Level R was added to the District in Fiscal Year 1993/94. All parcels identified within Service Level R, share in both the cost and the benefits of the services provided. The costs associated with the services, are equitably spread between all benefiting parcels within vadous areas (rate levels) of the Service Level. Each parcel is charged its fair share of the costs of the services in proportion to the estimated benefit received. In Fiscal Year 1995/96, two (2) areas of the City'* and the parcels in those areas have been added to Service Level R. The level of maintenance required within these two (2) areas van/due to operating costs, and' therefore separate rate levels have been established. Only the parcels within each of the two (2) boundan/areas will be charged for the costs associated with servicing and maintaining the roads and streets in the area. Rate Level R-1 The parcels within this rate level consists of one hundred twenty- four (124) parcels that have direct access to roads or streets that are serviced and maintained through the District. This rate level provides funding for servicing and maintenance of.. Nicolas Road; Greenwood Lane; !,iefer Road; Gatlin Road; Pala Vista; Calle Girasol; Aussie Road; Calle Chapos; Walcott Road; and Tommy Lane. A total of 3.196 miles of roads are serviced and maintained in this area. Rate Level' R-2 The parcels within this rate level consists of fifty-nine (59) parcels that have direct access to roads or streets that are serviced and maintained through the District. This rate level provides funding for servicing and maintenance of.. Ormsby Road; Santiago Road; Lolita Road; and John Wamer Road. A total of 1.003 miles of roads are serviced and maintained in this area. MFS, CHANGES TO THE DISTRICT For Fiscal Year 1995/96, changes within the District' that affect the levy are outlined below. A. ModfficaUons of the District Structure Modffications to the District structure, if any, could include, but are not limited to: changes in the types of services provided; addition of new services or Service Levels; restructuring of the current Service Levels; or revisions in the method of apportionment. No changes are anticipated to the District structure for this Fiscal Year. Two (2) project areas (rate levels) am being added to Service Level R for Fiscal Year 1995/96. The new rote levels within Service Level R will provide funding for the servicing and maintenance of unpaved roads. Only the parcels within each of the two (2) boundary areas will be charged for the costs associated with servicing and maintaining the roads and streets in the area. AnnexaUons Annexations to Service Level B (Residential Street Lighting), are the parcels within Tracts: 22762-00 23125-01 24133-00 22916-03 2348'3-00 24135-00 23100-03 24131-01 24135-02 23101-02 24131-02 Annexations to Service Level C (Local Landscaping and Slopes), are the parcels within the following tram: · Rate level #1 -Tract 22762-00 (Rancho Highlands). · Rate level ~ - Tract 22148-00 (Morrison Homes). · Rate level # 3 - Tracts 22916-00, 22916-01 and 22916-02 (Vintage Hills) · Rate level # 4 - Tracts 21675-00 (Village Grove); Tract 25004-01 (Barclay Estates). 7 $MFS Annexations to Service Level D (Citywide Recycling and Street Sweeping): A total of 1,805 parcels have been added to Service Level D for the 1995/96 Fiscal Year. Annexations to Service Level R (Roads) include:' · One hundred twenty-four (124) parcels to rata level #1 · Fifty-nine (59) parcels to rate level fY2 No other annexations are planned to any of the other 'Service Levels or to the Distdct for Fiscal Year 1995~96. District Budget Change The Community Services, Parks and Recreation Service Level rates ha~e increased due to the operations and maintenance costs of the Temecula Community Recreation Center, and the Old Town Temecula Senior Center, as well as expansion and improvements to several neighborhood and community parks. Operations and energy costs for Service Levels A (Arterial Street Lights) have increased over the previous year. However, the increased cost has been off-set by an increase in the EDU count for the Service Level. In Service Level B (Residential Street Lighting), the number of parcels receiving benefit has also increased, but due to increased energy costs, there will be a small increase to the rate per parcel. Service Level D (Recycling and Refuse), has increased due to an increase in the:Consumer Pdce Index (CPI). ..gMFS DISTRICT BUDGETS Table III on the next two (2) pages show the District budget for Fiscal Year 1995~96. TABLE ill 1995/96 DISTRICT BUDGET Temecula Community Services District Operating Budget Department Summary for the Year Ending June 30, 1996 k 110 1N 111 113 1N. ~['i ] 'J '] i 'i 5102 tOSS 2.S13 2.78e 8,128 O O 510~ 0 O 0 O O O O 5104 8,285 242 288 8SO 0 O 5106 2.400 0 0 0 O O 2,400 5108 5,062 12g 28/' 446 O 0 5110 O O O 0 O 0 O 5112 20.988 1.136 186 1.717 0 0 23.~i7 s,3I ~1. I zN I s.eo I ..,,41o I o I ,~m ""1.,==1.,~1=.;I ~:=1 0 O O O 0 0 0 O 0 O 8,QQQ SOQ 0 O O 0 O 0 O 0 0 0 O O O O 4,500 O 47.868 0 0 177.386 O I 0 I 0 1 O J 12.(X30 :i :1 :1:1 :1 :1 °1 -:1 0 33,1X30 0 0 0 O 1.000 0 0 O O 2.000 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 LSGO O O 0 O 3.S22 0 0 o O 12.Q00 0 O 0 O 2.000 0 86.045 0 O 0 0 0 0 7.500 O O O 0 5200 0 O O O 10,000 0 O O 0 20.000 0 20.000 0 0 11.800 0 0 1.530 O 0 O O O 0 0 0 O ?,TRIO 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 5.000 0 O 0 0 2.0130 :1 °1 °1 :1 ""' o 0 S.O00 0 t S1.500 9 gMFS. TABLE III 1995/96 DISTRICT BUDGET Temecula Community Services District Operating Budget Department Summary for the Year Ending June 30, 1996 0 0 0 0 182.000 55 OpemengEamesem S,i00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Emegenow Roecl Memteemme 54132 0 0 0 0 0 tt398 19318 Lanmmpe Mainemine 5415 421.640 15.000 0 278.895 0 0 715.535 L~ Rll- ...... ~ 5416 O 0 0 23.1/1 O O 23.171 Sulmmle {5,100'm) 1421,840 115.000 10 1302.088 10 119,,198 ITt~IN SUBTOTAL {Olaf' r~qandlne) CART,M, OUTLAY OInm Fumeen0s I~..~. .;,; . SUGTOTAL (Caeital Outlay) TOTAL~COITI RESERVE FOR CON'TINGENCY TOTAL DISTRICT COSTS TOTAl, IXPINDrI'URII RI'VINUll OTHER REVENUE SOURCES FUND lAINaCE BALANCE TO LEVi' TOTAL RIVENUll ~ ,0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5001 502.415 0 0 0 0 0 JJ2.415 5502.41S 10 I0 10 10 I0 1J1~,415 1,000 0 0 0 0 0 1,0O0 1.000 0 0 0 0 0 1,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.100 I0 I0 55 . 12.186,.S~4 $174.255 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.188.544 174255 28/.895 554.748 1.110./5/ 19,,118 I3,188,544 1174.255 12~7.815 1s54,748 I1,180./57 119,318 47t40~ t2~1 3.too 28,0OO 22.310 0 ~t284 lo.378 2O.72S 51.3s8 214eo o 21o,325 $1MFS METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT AS in past years, the cost to provide services within the District will be fairly distributed among each assessable property based upon the estimated benefit received by each property. The benefit formula used is based upon the Service Level, the !and use and size of a property. For the Community Services, Parks, and Recreation Service Level; and Service Level A (Arterial Street Ughting and Medians); each property is assigned an Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU) factor that reflects the properbfs land use and degree of benefit. For Service Level B (Residential Street Lighting); Service Level C (Local Landscaping and Slopes); and Service Level D (Recycling and Refuse); the rates and charges am calculated on a per:parcel basis. In Service Level R (Roads) each property is assigned a Parcel Development Unit (PDU) factor that reflects both parcel count and whether the parcel is developed. The following is the formula used to calculate each property's District charges by EDU. Please refer to Appendix A for a complete listing of land use codes and their assodated EDU. Community Services, Parks and Recreation Service Level; and Service Level A (Arterial Street Lighting and Medians): Parcel EDU X Acres or Units X Charge per EDU = Parcel Charge The following is the formula used to calculate each property's District charges by the per parcel'method. · - Service Level B (Residential Street Lighting); Service Level C (Local Landscaping and Slopes); and Service Level D (Citywide .Recycling and Refuse): Total Balance to Levy / Total Parcels (in Service Level) = Parcel Charge The Rate Per Levy Unit for Service Level R is based on a Parcel Development Unit (PDU), which is similar to a per parcel charge, but makes a distinction between developed and undeveloped parcels. Service Level R (Roads): Parcel Development Units = 1.0 for Developed Parcels Parcel Development Units = 0.5 for Undeveloped Parcels Total Balance to Levy/Total Parcel PDU (in rate Level) = Parcel Charge gMFS Table IV shown on the next two pages, reflects the levy calculations for various property types for each Service Level. TABLE N PARCEL CHARGE CALCULATIONS FOR COMMUNITY SERVICES, PARKS, AND RECREATION Property Type Single Family Residential Multi Family Residential Agricultural Non-~id~nti~l Vaunt NorPR~identiN Iml~rov~l EDU X perEDU · Charge. Multiplier 1,00 $88,88 $88,88 Per Unit 0,75 68,88 51,66 Per Unit 0,50 68,88 : 34,44 Per Acre 2,00 68,88 137,76 Per Acre 4,00 68,88 275,52 Per Acre 6,00 $68,88 $4132.8 Per Acre PARCEL CHARGE CALCULATIONS FOR SERVICE LEVEL A Single Family Residential 1.00 Multi Family Residential 0.75 Agricultural 0,50 Single Family Vacam 2.00 Non-Residential Vacant 4.00 Non-Residential Improved 6,00 Charge--:- --.,: Parcel .... per-EDU' i' Charge ~- MulUpller $4,16 $4,16 Per Unit 4.16 3,12 PerUnit 4,16 2.08 'PerAcre 4.16 8.32 Per Acre 4,16 16,64 Per Acre $4,16 $24,96 Per Acre PARCEL CHARGE CALCULATIONS FOR SERVICE LEVEL B Property Type Single Family Residential Single Family Vacant u.~. x perparc~ - Charge 1.00 $26.92 $26.92 1.00 $26,92 $26.92 Mumplbr Per Parcel Per Parcel MFS TABLE N PARCEL CHARGE CALCULATIONS FOR SERVICE LEVEL C Property Type Single Family Residential Rate C-1 Single Family Residential Rate C-2 Single Family Residential Rate C-3 Single Farre/ReaidgnUa Rate C-4 Pan:el- Charge: · Unit X per Parody: , .O0 I ,,.OO 1.00 89.00 1.00 116.00 1.00 i $175.00 f Parcel: - 2 Charge' -Multiplier ,,,.oo I Par 89,00 Per Parcel 116,00 Per Parcel $175,00 i Per Parcel PARCEL CHARGE CALCULATIONS FOR SERVICE LEVEL D · ' Unit- 1.00 PARCEL CHARGE CALCULATIONS FOR SERVICE LEVEL R 'Parcel;. 'Charger Property Type Unit X perUnit Single Family Residential Rate R-1 1.00 $157.08 Single Family Vacant Rate R-1 0.50 157.08 Single Family Residential Ram R-2 1.00 121.92 Single Family Vacant Rate R-2 0.50 $121.92 Parcel, Charge.. Multiplier ' $157.08 Per Parcel 78,54 Per Parcel 121.92 Per Parcel $MFS Appendix A - LAND USE/EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS Property Type Single Family Residential Multi Fam~ Residential Agricultural Single Family Vacant Non-Residential Vacant" Non-Residential Improved 1995~96 Equivalent Dwelling' UnitsMultiplier 1.00 Units 0.75 Units 0.50 Acres 2.00 Acres 4.00 Acres 6.00 Acres 14 gMFS Appendix B - 1995/96-COLLECTION ROLL Parcel identification, for each lot or parcel within the District, shall be the parcel as shown on the County Assessor's map for the year in which this report is prepared. Non-assessable lots or parcels include govemment owned land, public utility owned property, and land principally encumbered with public rights-of-way. A listing of parcels within this District, along with the charges, has been submitted to the City Clerk and, by reference, is made part of this report. 15 SERVICE LEVEL R - RATE LEVEL 1 LIEFER I ITEM 4 APPRO~~3~" CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: Board of Directors FROM: Ronald E. Bradley, General Manager : DATE: SUBJECT: June 13, 1995 Temecula Middle School Lighting Project PREPARED BY: ~ RECOMMENDATION: Herman D. Park. r, Recreation Superintendent-'~~ That the Board of Directors: Adopt the Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program prepared for the Temecula Middle School Lighting Project. : 2. Approve the plans and specifications for the Temecula Middle School Lighting Project. Authorize the release of a formal public bid for the Temecula Middle School Lighting Project. DISCUSSION: In an effort to provide additional athletic fields and services for community youth sport organizations to utilize during evening and weekend hours, the Community Services Department is in the process of installing a lighting system on all athletic fields at Temecula Middle School. Undoubtedly once completed, the Temecula Middle School lighting project will enhance the City's ability. to provide additional fields and hours of use for youth sports, activitie~ and special events. On December 20, 1994, the City Council awarded a design services agreement to Dream Engineering Inc. for the development of plans and specifications for the Temecula Middle School Lighting Project. Staff has worked closely with Dream Engineering. carefully reviewing each submittal of plans and specifications. The plans and specifications for the project were submitted to the Division of State Architects (D.S.A.) March 9, 1995 and approved by D.S.A. on May 4, 1995. The plans and specifications are available for review in the City Engineers office. From the beginning of this project, staff has also worked closely with Temecula Valley Unified School District, keeping each other informed of our progress and conferring on various project processes including soils testing, inspections and submittal of the D.S.A. application. The School District has been extremely supportive of this project from its inception. With the Board of Directors adoption of the Negative Declaration, approval of the plans and specifications. and authorization to release a formal public bid, staff proposes to begin the formal bid process June 15, 1995. FISCAL IMPACT: The estimated construction cost for this project is ~285,000. Adequate funds have been appropriated for the project in account 210-190-141-5804. City of Temecula Planning Department xn d F. avironm ntai Study L BACKGROUND INIrO~ON 1. Nan~ of Project: T~ kfiddle School Sport Field LiSh~ng Project 2. Case Numbers: 3. Location of Project: N/A 42075 Meadows Pkwy, Temecula, CA 92592 Description of l}roj~ct: Install sports !i_ohtln_v for two nltln_~ baseball fields and existing football ~eld/U'~k arm at the Temecula Middle School. .' 5. Date of Environmental Assessment: Jannary 27, 1995 6. Name of Proponent: Temecula Comtnnnity Services Dept. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: 43 174 BuSiness Park Drive Ternecula, CA 92.590 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanatiom to all the answers are provided in Section 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: Yes ~ No Unstable earth conditions or in changes geologic substructures? X Disruptions, displacements, compaction, or over covering of the soil? X Change in topography or ground sudace relief features? X The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? X ew Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? X f. Changes in siltation, deposition or erosion? g. The modification of any wash, channel, creek, river or lake? _ _ X mu, x.,t~n~mmmse.ms uz3m ~ 1 Yeslia. No h. Exposur~ of people or property to geologic hazards such as -earlhquakes, landslides, mudslides, liquefaction, ground failure, or s|m~ar hazards7 i. Any developmeat within an Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone? 2. Air, WHI the proposal result in: a. Air ~ni~ioas or deterioration of smbient air quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors? c. Alteration of air movement, temperatare, or moisture or any change in climate, whether locally or regionally?. 3. Water, Will the proposal result in: " a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waten? b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff?. c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? d. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to, tempersDire, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? g. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions, withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? h. Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? i. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding? 4. Plant Life, Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or nutnber of any native species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, cops, and aquatic plants)? X X X Yes Maybe No b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, tare, ~ed. or endangered species of plants? __ c. Introduction of n~w species of pin ~ an area of native - vegetation, or in a barrier m the normal reple~ishme~ of existing species? __ d. Reduction in the acreage of any agricultural crop? __ Animal Life. Will the proposal result im a. Change in the diversity of species, or numben of any species of animals (animals includes all land aninuds, birds, reptiles, fish, amph~ians, shellfish, benthic 0rgnni~m% and/or insects)? _ b. Reduction of the numben of any unique, rare, threatened, o~ endangered species of animals? __ c. The ~lroduction of new wildlife species into an area? d. A barrier to the mig~-a~ion or movement of sn;m9]~9. e. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlifo habitat? __ Noise. Will the proposal resttit in: b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? __ c. Exposure of people to severe vibrations? __ Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce or result in light or glare? X Land Use. Will tho proposal result a. Alteration of the present land uso of an area? __ b. Alteration to the future planned land use of an area as described in a COmmUHity or general plan? _ Natural Resourees. Will the proposal result in: a. An increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? b. The depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? __ X X X X X X Yes Maybe No 10. 11. 12. Risk of Upset. W'ffi the proposal result in: A risk of an explosion or the release of any hazardous substances in the event of an a~cident or upset conditions (hazardous oH or radiation)? The use, storage, transport or disposal of any hazardous or toxic materials Cmcluding, but not limited tO oH, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation)7 Poss~le interference with an emergency response plan or an emergency evacuation plan? Population. WHI the proposal alter the location, distr~ution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? Homing. Will the proposal affect existing housing or create a demand for additional housing?. 13. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal rmult in: 14. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking?. Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems, including public transportation? Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traf~c? Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? Public Services. Will the proposal have substantial effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? b. Police protection? c. Schools? d. Parks or other recreational facilities? X X ~m..am~oxTsmMmsc.ms s~3ss mb 4 e. Mainten=nee of public facilities, including roads? f. Other governramrod services: 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? b. Substantial increase in demand upon exisfin.v sources or energy, or require the development of new sources of energy7 16. Utilities, Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to any of the following utilities: a. Power or nanwal gas? b. Communicatiom systems? c. Water systems? d. S~-tary sewer systems or septic tanks? e. Storm water drainage systems? f. Solid waste disposal systems? g. Will the proposal result in a disjointed or inefficient pan~rn of utility delivery system improvemems for any of the above? 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in: a. The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? b. The exposure of people to potential. health hazards, including the exposure of sensitive receptors (such as hospitals and schools) to toxic polluXant emissions? 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in: Maybe No X 19. a. The obstruction of sny scenic vista or view open to the public? _ b. The creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? __ c. Detrimental visual impacts on the surrounding area? __ Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational resources or opportunities? X X X X ~:u,~m~~.ms sr~sss kb 5 Yes Maybe No 20. Cultural Resources. WHI the proposal result in-_ The alteration or destnsction of any paleontologic, prehistoric, archaeological or historic site? X Adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure, or object? X Any potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? X Restrictions to existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? X 111, DISCUSSION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACfS 1. a-h No, The project is for the instal_~!mon of spore lighting for two baseball fields and the football fieldXInck area. The only alteration to the ground will be for the digging of footln~ for the light standards. Therefore, there will no i,ml~:ts as a result of this project and no mitigation measures are required. Air Water No, The installation of the lighting facilities will not result in air emissions or deterioration of air quality, create objectionable odor or affect air movement, texnl:~nture or moisture or any change in climate. Therefore, there will no irapoets as a result of this project and no mitigation measures are required. .. 3 .a-i No, The imtallation of lighting facilities will not result in any impacts to water resources. Therefore, there will no impacts as a result of this project and no mitigation measures are required. Plant llfe 4.a-d No, The site is currently developed as a school site. The project will not result in any impacts to any plant life. Therefore, there will no impacts as a result of this project and no mitigation measures are required. Animal Life 5.a-~ No, The site is currently developed as a school site. The project will not result in any impacts to any animal life. Therefore, there will no impacts as a result of this project and no mitigation measures are required. Noise 6.a Yes, The project will result in an increase to the w. mt of noise generated at the site due to the fact that the lights will allow for increased use of the playing fields. The increased use of the fields will not impact the school because the increased use will occur when school is not in session. While the adjacent land uses are currently vacant, single family homes are planned for this area. The future residents will not be impacted because the noise will be mitigated through the use of a landscape transition area between the school and the residences. Also, the distances between the school and the future residences will be of significant distances (approximately 150 to 200 feet) to further reduce the noise impacts. Therefore, the in~,acts are not considered to be significant and no mitigation measures are required. 6.b,c No. The noise from this project will not be at a level that is considered to be of a significant level. · Also, the project will not expose people to severe vibrations. Therefore, there will no impacts as a result of this project and no mitigation measures are required. ~:xr~,a~ox~num>sc.ms sm/gs kS 7 Light and Glare Yes, The construction of lightinK facilities will result in new light and glare. However, thelights will be on ele~izic timers that wHI tm'a off the lights at 10:00 p.m. each evenln~. Also, the lights will be de~L~med to be directed on to the playing fields and away from future residences. Finally, the lights v/dl be required m conform to the requirements of the Palomar Lighting Ordinance No. 655. Therefore, the impacts are not comidered to be significant and no mitigation measures are Land Use 8.a,b No. The project will not elter the current of future land use of the site. Therefore, there will no impacts as a result of this project and no mitigation measures are required. Natural Resources .. 9.a,b No. The projea will result in an increased consumption of electricity which will result in an incremental increase in the use of electricity. However, there are existing facilities to adequately supply the project. Therefore, there will no impacts as a result of this projea and no mitigation measures are required. Risk of Upset lO.a-c No, The proposal will not expose people to any potential b~r~'dom substances or interfere with an emergency response or evacuation plan. Therefore, there will no impacts as a result of this project and no mitigation measures are required. Population 11. No. The proposal is not of the type that would alter the location, distribution, density or growth rate of the human population. Therefore, there will no in~.acts as a result of this project and no mitigation measures are required. Housing 12. No. The proposal is not of the type that would affea existing housing or create a demand for additional housing. Therefore, there will no impacts as a result of this project and no mitigation measures are required. Transportation/Circulation 13. a-f No. The projea will not result in an impaa to transportation or circulation. The transportation facilities that are curren~y utilized during the daytime use of the site will continue to adequately handle any additional impacts arising from nighttime use of the site. Therefore, there will no impacts as a result of this project and no mitigation measures are required. Public Services 14. a-f No. The project will not result in an imp. act to public services. Therefore, there will no impaas as a result of this project and no mltiLmtton measures are required. 15. a,b Utilities No. The project will result in an incremental usage of electricity. However, there are existing facfiities to adequately supply the project. Therefore, there will no impacts as a result of this project and no mitigation measures are required. 16. a-g No. As stated above, the project ~ result in an incremental usage of electricity. However, there are existing facilities to adequately supply the project. The project will not result in an impact to other utilities. Therefore, there dill no impaas as a result of .this project and no mitigation measures are required. Human Health 17. a,b No. The project dill not create or expose people to any potential health hazards. Therefore, there will no impacts as a result of this project and no mitigation measures are required. Aesthetics 18. a-c No. The project will obstrua any views, create an aesthetically offensive site or ereate detrimental views. Therefore, there will no impacts as a result of this project and no mitigation measures are required. Recreation 19. Yes. The project will impaa the quantity of recreational resources by providing ~ncreased opportunity to utilize the playing fields a~ this site. This impaa is considered to be positive and therefore, there will no impacts as a result of this project and no mitigation measures are required. Cultural Resources 20. a-d No. The project is not located in an area known to contain significant cultural resources. Therefore, there will no impacts as a result of this project and no mitigation measures are required. IV. MANDATORY FINDINC~ OF ~IGNIFICANCE Does the project have time potential to ~ie~er: degrade the quality of the environmere, subst=m~ny reduce the habitat of a f-mh, wildlife or bird species, came a fish, wildlife or bird population to drop below self sustaining levels, threatm to eBmlm~e a plant, bird or animal epecies, or eli,,i~=~_, importam rampies of the major periods of California history or prehismry? Does the project have the potential to achieve short term, W the disadvantage of long term, environmental Soals? (A short term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brid, definitive period of time while long term impacts will endure well into the future.) Yes X X Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulstlvely considerable? (A project's impact on tWO or more separate resources may be relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly?. X V. DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME "DE MINIMUS" IMPACT FINDINGS Does the project have the potential to cause any adverse effect, either individually or cumulatively, on fish and wildlife resources? Wildlife is defined as 'all wild animals, birds, plants, fish, amphibians, and related ecological communities, including the habitat upon which the wildlife depends on for it's continued viability* (Section 711.2, Fish and Game Code). Yes X kZ.~'eONO~TaSOmC~S S/23/gS kS 10 ENVIRONMENTAL DEI'ERMINATION I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a sig~fficm~ effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed pwject could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant dfea in this case because the Mitigation Measures described on the attached sheets and in the Conditions of Approval that have been added to the project will mitigate any potentially significant imp, acts W a level of insignificance, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find the proposed project MAY have a si~mificsm effect on the environment, and sm ENVIRO~AL IMPACT RBI~RT is required. Prepared by: Signa~/~e Craig f). Ruiz. As.~istnnt P]nnner Name and Title Date 5~3~5 .: fiEDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ** · ITEM 1 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY TUESDAY, MAY 23, 1995 A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency was called to order at 8:28 PM at the Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. Chairperson Ronald J. Parks presiding. PRESENT: 5 AGENCY MEMBERS: Lindemans, Muftoz, Robarts, Stone, Parks ABSENT: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None Also present were Executive Director Ronald E. Bradley, General Counsel Peter Thorson and City Clerk June S. Greek. PUBLIC COMMENTS None. CONSENT CAL;NDAR It was moved by Agency Member Lindamans, seconded by Agency Member Stone to approve Consent Calendar Item No. 1. The motion carried as follows: AYES: 5 AGENCY MEMBERS: NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Lindemans, Mur~oz, Roberrs, Stone, Parks AGENCY MEMBERS: None AGENCY MEMBERS: None Approve the minutes of May 9, 1995. Minutes:rda\052395 -1 - AGENCY BUSINESS 2 Temecula Shuttle I:'roiect Agency Member Stone announced a conflict of interest because of property ownership in Old Town, and stepped down from the ;}odium. Assistant City Manager Mary Jane McLamey presented the staff report. Ed Doole, Temecula Shuttle, spoke in favor of staff recommendation. It was moved by Agency Member Lindemans, seconded by Agency Member Roberts to approve staff recommendation as follows: 2.1 Approve the execution of s lease of City-owned property at Front and Sixth -' Streets (APN #922-023-020)to Ed end Kathleen Dool under terms end conditions described in Attachment A in a form acceptable to the Executive Director and Agency Attorney; 2.2 2.3 Approve an RDA Rehabilitation Loan of $100,000 for the construction of the Temecula Shuttle project under the terms described in Attachment B; Approve the appropriation of ~97,423.76 for the purchase of property located at 41953 Main Street, Temecula, California (APN #922-034-0291 )in accordance with Redevelopment Agency action of December 20, 1994. (Attachment C). The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: 4 AGENCY MEMBERS: Lindemans, Muf~oz, Roberts, Parks NOES: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None ABSTAIN: I AGENCY MEMBERS: Stone EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT None given. AGENCY MEMBER'S REPORTS None given. Minutes .rda\052395 -2- ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Agency Member Stone, seconded by Agency Member Lindemans to adjourn at 8:35 PM to a meeting on June 13, 1995, 8:00 PM, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, Califomia. The motion was unanimously carried. Roneld J. Parks, Chairperson Ronald ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk/Agency Secretary Minutes~rda\052395 -3- ITEM 2 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPRO~ CITY ATTORNi~RE~ RNANCE OFRC CITY MANAGE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA REPORT Redevelopment Agency Board Members/Executive Director Gary Thomhill, Director of Planning June 13, 1995 Certificates of Redevelopment Plan Conformance (PA95-0037, PA95-0038, PA95-0039, PA95-0040, PA95-0041 ) PREPARED BY: David W. Hogan, Associate Planner RECOMMENDATION: BACKGROUND: It is requested that the Redevelopment Agency Board approve, authorize the Chairman to sign, and the City Clerk/Agency Secretary to attest and so record, the attached Certificates of Conformance. The Agency's adopted Redevelopment Plan requires that real property within the Project Area be developed, changed, or rehabilitated only in conformance with the provisions of the adopted Plan. In addition, Section 311 requires the Agency to provide, upon the request of any conforming owner, a Certificate of Conformance that their property is in compliance with the provisions of the adopted Redevelopment Plan. On April 25, 1995, the Agency approved a request for a Certificate of Conformance for the central shopping facility at Tower Plaza. This request is for many of the satellite buildings at the center. DISCUSSION: On May 12, 1995, Agency staff received a request from AEW/LBA Acquisition Co, LLC for Certificates of Conformance on several properties in Tower Plaza. Based upon this request, staff has reviewed the available records and has determined that all the properties have been developed in compliance with the provisions of the Redevelopment Plan 1988-1. As a result, staff recommends that the Agency approve the attached Certificates of Conformance. RSCAL IMPACT: None Attachment: 1. Certificate of Conformance for 921-270-037 (PA95-0037)- Page 2 2. Certificate of Conformance for 921-270-049 (PA95-0038)- Page 4 3. Certificate of Conformance for 921-260-017 (PA95-0039)- Page 6 4. Certificate of Conformance for 921-260-022 (PA95-0040)- Page 8 5. Certificate of Conformance for 921-260-019 (PA95-0041)- Page 10 R:~REDEV~RDAgrd)02.COC 5130f85 dwh 1 ATTACHMENT NO. I R:~IEDEV%RDAe6002.COC 5/30/96 dwh 2 Recording requested by, end when recorded return CITY OF TEMECULA 43174 Bueineee Perk Drive Temeoule, CA 92890 ATTN: City Clerk CERTIFICATE OF CONFORMANCE TEMECULA RB)EVELOPMENT AGENCY WHEREAS, County of Riverside Redevelopment Plan 1-1988 (hereinafter the "Plan"); is the Redevelopment Plan for the Temecula Redevelopment Project Area (hereinaftsr the 'Project Area'). The Plan was approved by Ordinance No. 658 of the Board of Supervisors of Riverside County on July 12, 1988· prior to the incorporation of the City of Temecule. The City of Temecula then incorporated on December 1, 1989. Pursuant to City Ordinance No. 91-11, which became effective May 9, 1991, and City Ordinance No. 91-15, which became effective April 9, 1991, the City approved the Redevelopment Plan. Said Ordinances had the effect of adopting the Plan and transferring jurisdiction over the Plan to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula (hereinafter the 'Agency').as of July 1, 1991; WHEREAS, Section 311 of the Plan provides that any owner of property within the Project Area may request and the Agency shall issue a Certificate of Conformance stating that the property conforms to the requirements of the Plan as of the date of the issuance thereof; WHEREAS, notwithstanding the issuance of a Certificate of Conformance, in the event the owner desires to construct any additional improvements or substantially alter or modify existing structures on the property, or acquire additional real property within the project Area, then he may be required to enter into a participation agreement with the Agency in the same manner as required for other owners; WHEREAS, AEW/LBA Acquisition Co, a Limited Liability Company, owns certain real property located at 27555 Ynez Road (APN 921-270-037)in the City of Temecula (hereinafter referred to as the "Property'); WHEREAS, the Property was developed with an office building in 1987 pursuant to Plot Plan Number 10079 and subsequent Building Permits issued by the County of Riverside; WHEREAS, on June 13, 1995, the Agency conducted a duly noticed public meeting at which time it authorized the issuance of this Certificate of Conformance (PA95-0037). NOW, THEREFORE, the Agency does hereby certify that as of this date, the Property conforms to the requirements of the Plan. In witness whereof, the Agency has executed this certificate this · 1995. day of TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Agency Chairman ATTEST: [SEAM City Clerk/Agency Secretary R:~IEDEV%RDAg5002.COC 5/30/95 dwh 3 ATTACHMENT NO. 2 R:\REDEV~DM~O02.COC 5/30/95 dwh 4 Recording requeeted by, end when re~rded retum t~: CITY OF TEMECULA 43174 Businees Perk Drive Temeeule, CA 92690 ATTN: City Clerk CERTIRCATE OF CONFORMANCE TEMECULA FIEDEVELOPMENT AGENCY WHEREAS, County of Riverside Redevelopmerit Plan 1-1988 (hereinafter the 'Plan')' is the Redevelopment Plan for the Temecula Redevelopment Project Area (hereinafter the "Project Area'). The Plan was approved by Ordinance No. 658 of the Board of Supervisors of Riverside County on July 12, 1988, prior to the incorporation of the City Of Temecula. The City of Temecula then incorporated on December 1, 1989. Pursuant to City Ordinance No. 91-11, which became effective May 9, 1991, and City Ordinance No. 91-15, which became effective April 9, 1991, the City approved the Redevelopment Plan. Said Ordinances had the effect of adopting the Plan and transferring jurisdiction over the Plan to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula (hereinafter the 'Agency')as of July 1, 1991; WHEREAS, Section 311 of the Plan provides that any owner of property within the Project Area may request and the Agency shall issue a Certificate of Conformance stating that the property conforms to the requirements of the Plan as of the date of the issuance thereof; WHEREAS, notwithstanding the issuance of a Certificate of Conformance, in the event the owner desires to construct any additional improvements or substantially alter or modify existing structures on the property, or acquire additional real property within the project Area, then he may be required to enter into a participation agreement with the Agency in the same manner as required for other owners; WHEREAS, AEW/LBA Acquisition Co, a Limited Liability Company, owns certain real property located at 27735 Ynez Road (APN's 921-270-049) in the City of Temecula (hereinafter referred to as the "Property"); WHEREAS, the Property was developed with a restaurant in 1995 pursuant to Planning Application Number 94-0019and subsequent Building Permits issued by the City of Temecula; WHEREAS, on June 13, 1995, the Agency conducted a duly noticed public meeting at which time it authorized the issuance of this Certificate of Conformance (PA95-0038). NOW, THEREFORE, the Agency does hereby certify that as of this date, the Property conforms to the requirements of the Plan. In witness whereof, the Agency has executed this certificate this · 1995. day of TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY By: Agency Chairman ATTEST: [SEAL] City Clerk/Agency Secretary R:%REDEV%.RDAg6002.COC 6130/95 dwh 5 ATTACHMENT NO. 3 R:%REDEV'~RDA95002.COC 5/30/95 dwh 6 Recording requested by, end when rm~orded return t~: · CITY OF TEMECULA 43174 Busine. Perk Drive Temeeuls, CA 92590 ATTN: City Clerk CERTIRCATE OF CONFORMANCE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY WHEREAS, County of Riverside Redevelopment Plan 1-1988 (hereinafter the "Plan") is the Redevelopment Plan for the Temecula Redevelopment Project Area (hereinafter the 'Project Area"). The Plan was approved by Ordinance No. 658 of the Board of Supervisors of Riverside County on July 12, 1988, prior to the incorporation of the City of Temecula. The City of Temecula then incorporated on December 1, 1989. Pursuant to City Ordinance No. 91-11, which became effective May 9, 1991, and City Ordinance No. 91-15, which became effective April 9, 1991, the City approved the Redevelopment Plan. Said Ordinances had the effect of adopting the Plan and transferring jurisdiction over the Plan to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula (hereinafter the "Agency')as of July 1, 1991; WHEREAS, Section 311 of the Plan provides that any owner of property within the Project Area may request and the Agency shall issue a Certificate of Conformence stating that the property conforms to the requirements of the Plan as of the date of the issuance thereof; WHEREAS, notwithstanding the issuance of a Certificate of Conformance, in the event the owner desires to construct any additional improvements or substantially alter or modify existing structures on the property, or acquire additional real property within the project Area, then he may be required to enter into a participation agreement with the Agency in the same manner as required for other owners; WHEREAS, AEW/LBA Acquisition Co, a Limited Liability Company, owns certain real property located at 27401 Ynez Road (APN 921-260-017)in the City of Temecula (hereinafter referred to as the "Property"); WHEREAS, the Property was developed with a nursery in 1987 pursuant to Plot Plan Number 10079 and subsequent Building Permits issued by the County of Riverside; WHEREAS, on June 13, 1995, the Agency conducted a duly noticed public meeting at which time it authorized the issuance of this Certificate of Conformance (PA95-0039). NOW, THEREFORE, the Agency does hereby certify that as of this date, the Property conforms to the requirements of the Plan. In witness whereof, the Agency has executed this certificate this ,1995. day of TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Agency Chairman ATTEST: [SEAL] City Clerk/Agency Secretary R:~l)EV%RDAg5002.COC 5/30/95 dwh 7 ATTACHMENT NO. 4 R:%REDEV%RDAe6002.COC 6/30/95 dwh 8 Recording re~luested by, and when recorded retum CITY OF TEMECULA 43174 Business Peek Drive Temeeule, CA 92590 ATTN: City Clerk CERTIFICATE OF CONFORMANCE TEMECULA REDEVEI. OPMENT AGENCY WHEREAS, County of Riverside Redevelopment Plan 1-1988 (hereinafter the "Plan') is the Redevelopment Plan for the Temecula Redevelopment Project Area (hereinafter the "Project Area'). The Plan was approved by Ordinance No. 658 of the Board of Supervisors of Riverside County on July 12, 1988,prior to the incorporation of the City of Temecula. The City of Temecula then incorporated on December 1, 1989. Pursuant to City Ordinance No. 91-11, which became effective May 9, 1991, and City Ordinance No. 91-15, which became effective April 9, 1991, the City approved the Redevelopment Plan. Said Ordinances had the effect of adopting the Plan and transferring jurisdiction over the Plan to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula (hereinafter the "Agency')"as of July 1, 1991; WHEREAS, Section 311 of the Plan provides that any owner of property within the Project Area may request and the Agency shall issue a Certificate of Conformance stating that the property conforms to the requirements of the Plan as of the date of the issuance thereof; WHEREAS, notwithstanding the issuance of a Certificate of Conformance, in the event the owner desires to construct any additional improvements or substantially alter or modify existing structures on the property, or acquire additional real property within the project Area., then he may be required to enter into a participation agreement with the Agency in the same manner as required for other owners; WHEREAS, AEW/LBA Acquisition Co, a Limited Liability Company· owns certain real property located at 27423 Ynez Road (APN 921-260-022)in the City of Temecula (hereinafter referred to as the ".Property'); WHEREAS, the Property was developed with a medical office building in 1987 pursuant to Plot Plan Number 10079 and subsequent Building Permits issued by the County of Riverside; WHEREAS, on June 13, 1995, the Agency conducted a duly noticed public meeting at which time it authorized the issuance of this Certificate of Conformance (PA95-0040). NOW, THEREFORE, the Agency does hereby certify that as of this date, the Property conforms to the requirements of the Plan. In witness whereof, the Agency has executed this certificate this · 1995. day of TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY By: Agency Chairman A]'FEST: [SEAL] City Clerk/Agency Secretary R:~REDEV%RDA95002.COC 6/30/96 dwh 9 ATTACHMENT NO. 5 R:%REDEV~IDAgE002.COC 5130/9S dwh 10 Recording requested by, end when re~orded retum 1~: CITY OF TEIVIECULA 43174 Budnee Peek Drive TemmNle, CA 82590 ATTN: City Clerk CERTIFICATE OF CONFORMANCE TEMECULA REDEVB,OPMENT AGENCY WHEREAS, County of Riverside Redevelopment Plan 1-1988 (hereinafter the "Ran") is the Redevelopment Plan for the Temecula Redevelopment Project Area (hereinafter the "Project Area'). The Plan was approved by Ordinance No. 658 of the Board of Supervisors of Riverside County on July 12, 1988, prior to the incorporation of the City of Temecula. The City of Temecula then incorporated on December 1, 1989. Pursuant to City Ordinance No. 91-11, which became effective May 9, 1991, and City Ordinance No. 91-15, which became effective April 9, 1991, the City approved the Redevelopment Plan. Said Ordinances had the effect of adopting the Plan and transferring jurisdiction over the Plan to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula (hereinafter the "Agency")as of July 1, 1991; WHEREAS, Section 311 of the Plan provides that any owner of property within the Project Area may request and the Agency shall issue a Certificate of Conformance stating that the property conforms to the requirements of the Plan as of the date of the issuance thereof; WHEREAS, notwithstanding the issuance of a Certificate of Conformance, in the event the owner desires to construct any additional improvements or substantially alter or modify existing structures on the property, or acquire additional real property within the project Area, then he may be required to enter into a participation agreement with the Agency in the same manner as required for other owners; WHEREAS, AEW/LBA Acquisition Co, a Limited Uability Company, owns certain real property located at 27403 Ynez Road (APN 921-260-019)in the City of Temecula (hereinafter referred to as the 'Property"); WHEREAS, the Property was developed with an professional office building in 1987 pursuant to Plot Plan Number 10079 and subsequent Building Permits issued by the County of Riverside; WHEREAS, on June 13, 1995, the Agency conducted a duly noticed public meeting at which time it authorized the issuance of this Certificate of Conformance (PA95-0041). NOW, THEREFORE, the Agency does hereby certify that as of this date· the Property conforms to the requirements of the Plan. In witness whereof, the Agency has executed this certificate this · 1995. day of TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY By: Agency Chairman A'I'i'EST: [SEAL] City Clerk/Agency Secretary R:'~REDEV~AgBO02.COC EI30/95 dwh 11 ITEM 3 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAl CITY ATTORN TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA REPORT Executive Director/Redevelopment Agency Members 'Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer June 13, 1995 Appropriate Funds for T~le Report Acquirement, Appropriate Agencies' Permit Applications, Independent Check of the Bridge Plans, and the' Reproduction Cost of Documents Associated with the Design of First Street, and Contract Amendment No. 1 for the First Street Design PREPARED BY: John Pourkazemi, Assistant Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the Redevelopment Agency appropriate $50,000 for title report acquirement, appropriate agencies' permit applications, independent check of the bridge plans, and the reproduction cost of documents associated with the design of First Street, And, that the Redevelopment Agency approve Contract Amendment No. 1, and authorize Chairperson to execute the Amendment between the City and Norris-Repke, Inc. in the amount of $68,952 bringing the total contract amount to $243,794. The Agreement will be subject to the approval of the Executive Director and the General Counsel as to final form, And, that the Redevelopment Agency appropriate an additional $101,467.80 of Redevelopment Agency's bond proceeds in the Capital Improvement Program fund for the design of First Street, title report acquirement, appropriate agencies' permit applications, independent check of the bridge plans, and the reproduction cost of documents associated with the design of First Street, and contract amendment no. 1 for the First Street design. BACKGROUND: On December 13, 1994, the Redevelopment Agency epproved and authorized the Chairperson to execute an agreement between the City and Norris-Repke, Inc. to provide civil engineering services for the design of First Street in the amount of $174,842and 10% contingency in the amount of $17,484.20. The Redevelopment Agency also appropriated an additional $42,326.20 for the design of First Street for the 1994-95 fiscal year. First Street is included in the current Capital Improvement Program. The schedule for the deign of First Street has been expedited pursuant to T.Z.B.G., Inc. proposal for the Old Town Redevelopment Project. -1- r,~eldl~13~,vg~j-(~.mllejp DISCUSSION: The First Street conceptual alignment has now been set. SinCe the award of contract for the deign of First Street, site restrictions and other agencies' criteria and requirements have been analyzed subsequent to discussions and meetings with the environmental agencies (State of California Department of Fish and Game, and Water Resources Control Board), Federal Emergency Management Agency, Army Corps. of Engineers, and Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, and pursuant to completion of the Old Town Redevelopment Project Environmental Impact Report and traffic studies..Consequently the scope of work initially proposed by Norris-Repke, Inc. for the final design has expanded as described in the attached proposal. : FISCAL IMPACT: $150,000 is available in Capital Improvement Program Account No. 280-199-807-5802.: Although the disbursement of funds will be spread over Fiscal Year 1994-95 and Fiscal Year 1995-96 within the anticipated budget amount, it is necessary to approve an additional appropriation of $101,467.80in Fiscal Year 1995 (bringing the total appropriation amount to $143,794) in order to accommodate the funds necessary to process the First Street design and plans. Anticipated appropriations in Fiscal Year 1996 will decrease accordingly. The above mentioned costs and funding appropriation amounts are summarized below: A. Original Contract (Approved 12-13-94) $174,842.00 B. Proposed Contract Amendment No. I 68.959.00 Total O: $243,794.00 C. Recommendation item no. I $ 50,000.00 D. Total t) $943.794.00 Total cost associated with the design of First Street to date Total ·: $293,794.00 E. Initial Additional Appropriation $ 42,326.20 F. Proposed Additional Appropriation $101,467.80 (including $50,000 for Recommendation no. 1 ) Total ·: $143,794.00 G. Fiscal year 1994-95 budget appropriation for design purposes $150,000.00 H. Total · $143.794.00 / Total: $293,794.00 ATTACHMI:NT: 1. Contract Amendment no. I ATTACHMENT NO. 1 NORRIS-REPKE, INC. AMENDED CONTRACT r:.~9~O613~ew95-08 .~allsjp AMENDMENT NO. 1 NORRI$-REPKE, INC. CONTRACT ORDER NO. The Agreement dated December 13, 1994 between the City of Temecula, and Norris-Repke, Inc. (herein referred to as "Agreement") is hereby amended as follows: Re: Professional Design Services for Old Town First Street Bridge, First Street Realignment, and Roadway Improvements. Section 1 The Scope of Work is hereby amended by adding the activities as specified in Exhibit "A"; Norris-Repke, Inc.'s proposal dated May 31, 1995. TOTAL AMOUNT $68,952 Section 2 Compensation for services shall be total of all services described in this Amendment and shall not exceed Sixty Eight Thousand Nine Hundred and Fifty Two Dollars ($68,952.00). All above costs are eligible for funding through Redevelopment Agency Funds. Adequate funds have been reserved within budget of the Redevelopment Agency. The total cost of this element of the project is summarized below: A. Original Contract (Approved 12-13-94) $1-74,842 B. Proposed Contract Amendment No. I 68.95.~ Total: $243,794 -4- r:.~SdrptW5~0613~95-O~.csllsj~ Section 3 All other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain the same. The parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the Date and year above written. CONSULTANT CITY OF TEMECULA .' By: Norris-Repke, Inc. By: Ronald J. Parks, Chairman APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk -5- r.~ldrpt~95~0613~,v95-4)~4tllejp NORRIS-REPKE, INC. · · '1 · L cI 8 .. Hay 31, 1995 SuDersedes our Nay I letter NRZ 92-03 Warren W. Repke. PE F mc S. eerr . E John Pourkazemi Public Works City of Temecula 43174 Business Center Dr. Temecula, CA 92590 Subj: First Street Extension Dear John: As we ~iscussed, we request additional fees to cover the increased scope of work due to changes in the project. The major changes are to the bridge. Zt increased in length from 125' t~ 180', in width from 54' to 70', and in number of spans from I to 2. A second increase in length is from 180 to 220 feet. These require additional bridge design, additional geotechnical investigation, a streambed scour analysis for the central pier design, and increased project management and coordination. Another recent change is that' the number of channels to design to has doubled from one to.two requiring one additional hydraulic analysis, and mitigation design. The transition analysis in the original scope, between existing and ultimate with no pier, is no longer necessary. Zn its place is an analysls of the ultimate channel with a pier. We can substitute the latter for the for- mer. -The additional analysis is of the existing channel with interim columns askew to the existing flow direction. This condition likely will require design of mitigation measures to keep the water surface profile from raising more than the one foot allowed by FEHA. A minor change is to the alignment of Santiago/First St. at Front St.- shifted southerly approximately 110' and wldened 30' at the intersection requiring some additional topographic mapping. The design flowrates (O's) to be provided by the City were unknown. I spent additional time pursuing those values in meetings and phone conversations. Below is a summary of the fee increase request. Subconsultants' justification and elaboration are presented in the their letters, attached. MAIN OFFICE: 18231 IRVINE BLVD. · SUITE 204 · TLISTIN, CA 92680 · (714) 73(:~6410 · FAX: (714} 730~396 John Pourkazemt May 31, 1995 Bridge: LBA, bridge engineer, 1st tncrease LBA, 2nd tncrease Agra, geotechnical Dr. H. Chang, scour analysls engr. NRZ, lead, Topography: Lung, Photogrammetrist NRI, lead, Design O's: NRZ, Total increase Page 2 92-03 $31,412 4,344 7,807 17,700 6~069 390 285 67,332 675 945 68,952 · A breakdown of our part of the increased scope is as follows: Bridge: Obtain information required by the sedimentation engineer: Project manager: I hr · $105 = $105 Design engineer: 8 hrs e 63 = 504 Hydraulic analysis of interim piers at ultimate alignment on the existing channel alignment, and mitigation design: Project manager: 2 e 105 = 210 Project engineer: 16 · 72 = 1152 Design engineer: 6 e 63 = 378 Project management and coordination: Project manager: 8 · 105 = 840 Design engineer: 40 e 63 = 2880 6069 Topo: Coordination, integration into model: Design engineer:- I e n/c 0 Mapping technician: 5 · 57 = 285 Obtain design O's: Project' manager 9 e 105 = 945 NORRIS-REPKE, INC. John Pourkazemt Page 3 Hay 31, 1995 92-03 Please let me knoN if you need additional information. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, J k P. Norris Attached: Letter by LBA, 4-27-95 Letter by LBA, 5-24-95 Letter by Agra Letter by Chang p90:ws5\9203\extra. ltr NORRIS-REPKE, INC. t;;J I Buono, Axms ong & Associates A DIVISION OF FREDERIC R. HARRIS. INC. i 100 Town & Country, Road. Suite 300 / Orange. CA 92668 714/547-55 19 FAX 714/953-6989 May24,1995 Norris-Repke Inc. 33055 Vino Way Temecula, California 92591 Attention: Mr. Jack P. Norris, P.E. Reference: First Street Bridge Extension City of Temecula, California Dear Jack, Regarding our conversation of May 23, 1995, I have completed a revised estimate of'the manhours and fee for the bridge. Our proposal of March 10, 1995 was based on a bridge of 72' width andapproximately 180' in length (to account for the skew). The revised bridge is to be 70' wide and approximately 220' in length and will be the two span, cast-in-place, prestressed concrete box girder alternative. The estimated cost will be increased to about $1,200,000 for the bridge as it is now proposed; about 20% higher than the 180' bridge. The revised. Manpower Estimate and Cost matrix is attached along with an estimate for other direct costs. The design cost has increased approximately 5% to $97,144.00. Other direct costs are estimated to be $3,800.00,-as befor. e. Please do not hesitate to call me if you need clarification or additional iaformation. Sincerely, LoBUONO, ARMSTRONG & ASSOCIATES Brinain Poteet III, S.E~ · Principal Bridge Engineer .... C.4..t 1 -~ 0 n m~ 0 t] LoBuono, Axmstrong & Associates A I)IVISIItN ()F FRIilIERI{' R. IIARRIS. IN('. 222 Wcsl Sixlh Sireel. Suilc ~)50 / San Pedro. ('A ,~)7.11 310/~133-(,6~12 FAX 3 I(1/g.1.1-(,521 April 27, 1995 Norris-Repke Inc. 33055 Vino Way Temeeula, California 92591 Attel:tio::. Reference: Dear Jack, Mr. Jack P. Norris, P.E. First Street Bridge Extension City of Temeeula, California This letter presents supporting justification for the requested increase in the fee for the bridge design. The proposal which LAA initially presented was prepared using information provided in the Request for Proposal. At the time the RFP was issued the information available from the Riverside County Flood Control District indicated the proposed configuration of Murietta Creek was to be a rectangular channel having a bottom width of 120 feet. A sketch of the proposed channel was incorporated in the RFP. The proposed channel geometry effectively established the length of the bridge such that a single span structure of cast-in-place, prcstressed concrete was indicated as the probable choice. The RFP further defined the bridge-as having a total width of 54 feet (40 feet curb to curb, two 6 foot sidewalks and two I foot barriers in a 60 foot fight-of- way). Our proposal was developed considering the work required for preparing conceptual and preliminary design and final plans, specifications and estimates for the bridge configuration shown in the RFP. By the time of the initial kicli-off meeting with City representatives on January 25, 1995, the proposed future channel section had been revised to a trapezoidal cross section with a 120 foot bottom .and 2:1 side Slopes2 The length of the bridge thus will increase by approximately 50%. The width of the bridge was also .reyised to ;/0 feet, from the previously assumed 54 feet. The result of these changes is that the scope of our work as the bridge consultant is significantly increased. The design fee not only has a relationship to the cost of construction, which is estimated to increase 80% 4-, but is also related to other factors. Primary among these factors arc: The added length of the bridge suggests a two span bridge (w!th several possible alternative structural systems) must now be considered during the conceptual and preliminary design phases. Each of these additional potential alternatives will require Study, evaluation and preparation of a General Plan and General Plan Estimate. In my opinion, a single span bridge remains a viable option only if non-structural issues related to the site or City requirements warrant its use. The reason is that a single span bridge of t:l Norris-Repkc, Inc. Mr. Jack Norris April 27, 1995 Page 2 of 2 this length will be substantially more costly than a two span bridge. My opinion, which at this time is based solely on judgment, is that the extra cost for the single span bridge will bc about '$300,O00. We will certainly consider the single span alternative during preliminary design; if justified by site conditions, engineering or client considerations affecting the project. In this event we will provide a more reliable prclimina,'-y cost estimatc to comparc with the cost of each of thc altcrnativcs. The complexities of the analysis, design and dctailing will increasc substantially for the two span bridge. The primary factor affecting analysis and design has to do with the differences in how single span and multiple span structures arc designed lbr earthquake forces. The single span structure is designed using the relatively straight forward equivalent static force method. The two span structure must be analyzed using a dynamic analysis procedure and the displacement ductility of the structure must be determined using the most recent Caltrans procedures. Other complications to the design include: the need to perform a more rigorous prestressing design, the necessity to provide an indeterminate analysis to account for the continuity of the structure; and the requirement to design the center bent and its foundation. The two span structure will also require more extensive detailing. The cost of these additional design efforts is very little when compared to the construction cost saving to bc realized. Additionally, more coordination will be required in considering the additional alternatives and in thc dcsign of thc sclcctcd alternativc. I have given you an estimated fee of $96,600 f6r the two span structure. Although I have not .. , . .~ bri&tc. I believe the fee would wnrlted n-t a mnvnnwer and. fee estimate sheet for .he single snan _ be about 85,000-j:. If you have questions or would like to discuss any particular points please do not hesitate'to call me. Sincerely, LoBUONO, ARMSTRONG & ASSOCIATES Brittian Potcct III, S.E. Principal Bridge Engineer /MISCELLANEOUS AND OUT-OF-POCKET EXPENSES LoBuono, Armstrong-& Associates 222 ~ze$t 6th Street, Suite 950 Sa~ Pedro, CA 90731 Description: CiO~ of Temecula Bridge. First Street Extension ver.,.n Plotting Paper 108 IN'I'IOU,.SECOMPUTER: ....... ::::;.': ....;;J MICRO-COMPUTER 0 MAINFRAME 0 CADO 240 OUTSIDE! COMPUTER:; ... :'i :' ':' ." ": :.: sheets X ,$3.50 per sheet = $42.00 X $2.00 mr'sheet= $2f6.0C Hours X $0.08 = $0.00 Houm X $0.00 = $0.00 Hours X $1C ~0 = $2.,400.00 COMPUTER TOTAL COSTS Bluelines ×sox copms 0 Sheets 312 Sheets 12 Sheets 1500 Sheets X $4.00 per sheet = S0.1X) X $0.80 per sheet = $249.60 X $12.08 per sheet = Sl 44.08 X $0.10 per sheet = $150.00 Airline POV · ~,~- 0Tfi X 0Tri X 0 Trim- 8 Tdps 0Days REPRODUCTION TOTAL $2,400.08 0 People 0 Days X $120.08 = $0..09. 0 Paepte 0 Days X $10.08 = $0.00 X X' X SHIPP1NG'&:TEI:EPHONE:.: ":'::;:::.5. ': : :':.'i ::: l 8 Monthsat 110 Mi./Trip X MISCELLANEOUS & OUT-OF-POCKET EXPENSES TOTAL J::.'::" :'USE AGRA Earth & Environmental April 27, 1995 Job No. 195-010 AGRA Earth & Environmental. Inc. I~.10 Nnrlh H..qfw:,ock SlrLf:l P.C). t~}x't!lO;'!l An;ih~;m:. [;A t12~11 / (,'t-l) 7,'9 2591 171,1) 77."i R,177 Norris-Repke, Inc. 33055 Vino Way Temecula, California 92591 Attention: Mr. Jack Norris Re: Request For Additional Fee First Street Extension Temecula, California This letter summarizes the additional effort required to perform the geotechnical study for the currently proposed two span bridge crossing of Murrieta Creek, and provides a request for additional fee. Our original proposal, dated October 21, 1994, was based on the indication in the RFP that the Murrieta Creek bridge would be a single span structure and two borings were planned (one at each abutment location). It now appears that a two-span bridge will be required. In order to drill an exploratory boring at each support location it will now be necessary to drill one additional boring at the bridge pier. This boring will be within the existing Creek bed. The additional field work, laboratory testing, and office work required as part of the ~Iditionar exploration is summarized in Table 1. We respectively request that our contract amount be. increased by the amount of $7,807.68. Thank you for your attention in this matter. If you should have any. questions,' please contact this office. " AGRA Earth nvironmental, Bell Supervising Engineer DRB/ljo Inc, Encl.: Table 1 'Mr. Jack Norris (2) Engineering & Environmental Services Z 0 z o 0 ._l I-- :D 0 0 uJ · u.I 9- ID 0 u,,I I..- I,/1 0 f,,I izl ""' i,n 0 c p- Job No. 195-010- April 27, 1995 I- 0 0 Z ~ AGRA A-1 Earth & Environmental Howard H. Chang Consultants Hydraulic, Hydrologic and Sedimentation Engineering P.O. Box 9492 Rancho Santa Fe~ CA 92067 -. (619)756-.9050, 594.-6380, FAX: (619)756-9460 April 28. 1995 Mr. Jack Norris 33055 lilino Way Temecula, CA 92591 Dear Jack: PROJECT: Proposed First Street Extension Bridge on Murrieta Creek in Tcmccula Pursuant to your recent rexluest, I havc prcparcd this proponi to providc cnginccring services covering scour study of Murricta Crcek for the proposcd First Strcct Extcnsion Bridgc. This study shall provide the following .information: (1) general scour and local scour for the design of bridge bents (or piers) and abutmcnts, and (2) engineering specifications on the design of bank protection for thc abutmcnts. The'scour study shall include the following case scenarios for the bridge and road alignments: Case 1. Case 2. Existing channel conditions with the proposed bridge in place Ultimate conditions of channel improvement with proposed bridge in place Data Requirements: This scope does not include the hydrology study for the channel. The existing hydrology shall be used as a given information instead. In order to accomplish the services, this firm needs to be provided with the necessary data,. including (a) bridge plans and alignments, .' (b) topographic survey and cross section data of: channel reach for existing conditions and proposed channel improvement including the proposed detention basin, " (C) hydrograph of 100-yr flood and peak ,discharges for the 10- and 50-yr floods. and (d) size distributions of two soil samples taken from the channel bed at selected locations. In order to accomplish the objectives, the scope'of work has the following tasks: Task 1.- Field inspection and collection and review of existing floodplain information and data compilation - The available data on the hydrology and hydraulics of the channel shall be reviewed and compiled. Aerial survey of the channel reach in the vicinity of the crossing shall be used for data compilation. Task 2. Modeling for general scour, contraction scour-and scour due to channel curvature - Sediment transport and potential stream channel changes at the bridge crossing shall be simulatcd using the FLUVIAL-12 mathematical model, which is the only model that has been calibrated Using data from rivers in Southern California. General scour at the bridge crossing shall be determined; this scour shall reflect the channel alignment, bridge configuration, detention basins in the adjacent stream if any, channel projects, and other factors that may affect channel bed scour. This evaluation shall cover the two cases listed above. sufficient length to cov.e.r the major features that affect scour. The'study rcach shall bc ~}1' Scope of Mathematical Modeling - The' computer simulation study for gcncral scour shall be made for the lO0-yr flood, which generally is the design criterion. In addition, thc long term flood series in a l O0-yr time span shall also used since channel bcd dcgradation induccd by the detention basin will take a long time to develop. Information Generated by Mathematical Modeling - The simulation study will produce the following important information for the stream channel including the bridge crossing: (I) changes in channel cross sections during the 100-yr flood, (2) maximum cross-sectional changes during the 100-yr flood, (I) changes in channel cross sections during the flood series, and (2) maximum cross-sectiOnal changes during the flood series. Task 3. Computation of local scour depths at the bridge picrs/bcnts and abutmcnts bascd on the FHWA report "Evaluating Scour at Bridges, 1991 (HEC-I 8). Task 4. Selection of riprap size and other requirements for bank protection of abutments. Task 5. Preparation of project report - A technical report shall be prepared and submitted to the client; this report shall document the background, methods of study, findings and recommendations of the study. Proposal Budget: Task 1. $ 2,200 Task 2. $ 10,800 Task 3. $ 1,200 Task 4. $ 700 Task 5. $ 2,800 Total $ 17,700 Meetings: Time-and-material basis at $ 120 per hour. If you. have any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to call me. Sincerely ;~/~;-L > Howard H. Chang, Ph.D., P.E. President 2 NORRIS-REPKE, INC. Consulting CMI Engineers ancl Lanc~ Surveyors 800 N. TUSTIN A~ENLE · SUITE 250 · SANTA ANA, CA 92705-3736 · (714) 973-2230 · FAX (714)' 973-2263 NORRIS-REPKE, INC. SCHEDULE OF STANDARD HOURLY RAT -ES August 1, 1994 Jack P. Norms. F ' Warren W. Rep, Randy G Berry. Joseph M. LoyaCho. PLS N~x:l W rlN'kf:~;IWt. Principal Engineer ....................................................... $ i 05.00 Project Manager ........................................................... 92.00 Engineering Manager ................................ .. .....................83.00 Project Engineer ........................................................... 72.00' Design Engineer .......................................... : ................63.00 Designer/Senior Drafter .................................................... 60.00 Junior Engineer/Senior Technician ........................................... 48.00 Drafter/Technician ........................................................ 42.00 Technical Aide/Jr. Drafter .................................................. 37.00 Clerica] ................................................................. 37.00 Ficld Inspector ........................................................... 47.00 Licensed Land Surveyor ................................................... 88.00 Land Surveyor-In-Training .................................................. 55.00 Survey Crew (3-man) ........................................................... 150.00 (2-man) -125.00 Survey Travcl Time 1st one-half hour each way ...................................... I/2 crew rate After 1st one-half hour each way ..... · ................................... ". N/C Expert Testimony (2 hour minimum) .- ........................................ 180.00 The above fees will be escalated 5% on each August 1 beginning August 1, 1995, for any wof'k tincompleted at that time for reasons beyond Engineer's control. Outside agency fees are not included in above fees and will be billed at cost plus 15%. FEE SCHEDULE BRIDGE DESIGN POSITION PRINCIPAL BRIDGE ENGINEER SENIOR BRIDGE ENGINEER BRIDGE ENGINEER SENIOR TECHNICIAN ('CADD) TECHNICIAN (CADD) TECH. ASST.NVORD PROCESSOR HOURLYRATE $115.00 ..$98.00 $80.00 $70.00 $55.00 $40.00 AGRA Earth & Environmental, Inc. " .- FEE SCIIEDULE - GEOTECIINICAL SERVICES PERSONNELCHARGES Siaff EngineerlGenlngist ........................................................... Project Engineer/EngineeriN~ Geologist ................................................. Senior Engineer/Engineering Geologist ................................................. S,pervising Engineer/Engineering Geologist .............................................. Principal EnGinceriE~gim:ering Geologist ................................................ Field Technician I ............................................................... Field Technician H .............................................................. Senlot Field Technician [ .......................................................... Senior Field Techniclea I! .......................................................... Field Services Manager ........................................................... Labnrntory Tcchnician I ........................................ ..'. ................. Laboratory Technician H .......................................................... Senior Laborstory Technician ....................................................... Laboratory Manager ................................................. ..* ........... Gcotcchnical Dra~spcnmn I ........................................................ Gcotcchnical Drartspcr~}n !I ........................................................ Senior Geolcchnical Draftsperson ..................................................... Geotechnical Clcrkfr)'pist .......................................................... Word Proce.~sor (including Equipment) ................................................. Senior Word Processor (inchzding Equipment) ............................................. Deposilions and Court Teslimony (minimum charge of two hours) ................................ Overtime Premium is 30~ o(' PERSONNEL CHARGE EXPENSES S 65 .(30 fito. r 75.00 fitour 91.00 fitmar ! 0g .00 fiAtoar 125.00 fitour $ 54.00/boor 62.00/boor 68.00 fito, r 74.00 fitour 41.00fitnut 54 .(30 fitoar. 62.00/ho, r 74.00/hour 36.00/hour 47.00/hour 54.130 fitour 35.00 fitour 50.00 fitour 55.00/hour 225.00/1~oar Vehicle Use for Field Scrviccs (added to appropriate 'PERSONNEL CHARGE") ....................... Per Diem for Living Expenses ............. · .......................................... Outside Scrvlces (Cons, ltante, Surveys, Chemical Lab Tests, etc.) ......... .- ...................... Reimbursehies (7,,laps, Photos, Permits, Expendable Supplies, etc.) ................................ S 6.48 fitour 92.00 Ipers Cost + 15 · Cost + 15% EOUIP~,~ENT CH'ARGF..S BAT Permeametcr .............................................................. Computer and CADD ............................................................ Concrete Core Drill '. ................................................. $10.00/core plus Exploratory Equlpmcnt Rental (Drill Rig, Back~oe, etc.) ...... '. ............................... Groundwater Transducer and Daaaloggers ................................................ tlNU (Photoioni7.stion ~,ictcr) ....................................................... Monitoring Equipment Rental (Air, Waist, Hazardous Mal,'rlals, etc.) .............................. OVA (Organic Vapor Analyzer) ...................................................... Penalroaster - Dynamic ........................................................... Pcnctromctcr- Pneumatic Single-Channel Scismlc or Rcsistivity Equlpmcnt ,-. , , ,* ......... : ............................ Slope indicator ([ncllnomctcr) ................... , .......... : ......................... *Rcduccd rstcs will apply to cxlcndcd u~ge ,e 23.00fitour 23.00 fitour 18.00fitour Cost + · 30.130 fitour 92.00/day Cost + 15% I 1~..00/day 23.00 fitour 34.00 fitour 18.00 fitour 23,00 fitoar ENyIRONMENTAL SERVIC--ES · Fees ror environmenial ~rviccs and for services involving haz, a rdous materials will be charged in accordance with AGRA Earth & Environmental [nc.'s current 'FEE SCHEDULE - EN'V~'.ONMENTAL SERV[CF..S.' INSURANCE AGRA Earth & Environmental, Inc. carries workers' compensation, comprehensive general liability, automobile and professional liabilily insurance, with policy limits which normally are acceptable to most clients. The cost for this insurance is covered by the fees listed in this schedule. Cost orany special insurance requital by the Client, including increases in policy limits, adding additional insured parties and waivers orsubrogatinn, arc charged al coal plus 15 ~. Unless othcrwise orated, such charges are in addition Io the cstimaled or n~axlmunt charges staled in an accompanying proporal. Schedule I[ (Continued on Reverse) Earth & Environmental AGRA Earth & Environmental, Inc. - - FEE SCHEDULE - GEOTECIINiCAL SERVICES fcont'd) PERMITS, FEES AND BONDS The costs orsll I-:rmita, fees and pcrromancc bonds required by government agencies are to bc paid by the Client, unlcu stated otherwise in an accompanying proposal. PROPOSAL PERIOD Unicu otherwise stated, a proposal accompanying this schedule is effective for sixty (60) days. Ifauthorizatlon to proceed is not received wilhin ~is period, AGRA Earl~ & 'Environmental, Inc. reserves I~c right to rcncg~xialc the fcc. : LABORATORYTESTING California Bearing Ratio (excluding moisture-<lenalty curve) ..................................... $ 97.00/point Chloride Content ............................................................... 4~.00/test Consolidation Test (single point) ...................................................... 67.00/tell Consolidation Test (witho4st rate data) ...................................... · ............ 86.00/teat Consolidation Test Rate Dais (per 'load increment) .......................................... 42.00/each Direct Shear Test (at natural moisture - strain rats 0.04 inch/sin) ................................. 40.00/point Direct Shear Teat (saturated - strain rate 0.04 incldmin) ....................................... 49.00/l~int Direct Shear Test.(saluratcd, recycled - strain rate 0.04 inch/sin) ................................ 92.00/point Direct Sheer Test (ASTM 3080 - consolidated drained, 3 pointa/tgst) ............................... 325.00/test Direct Shear Test (AS'T~{ 3080 - consolidated drained, residual, 3 points/test) ......................... 550.00/teat Durability Zndex - Coarse and Fine .................................................... 136.00/test Expansion Index Teat ............................................................ 85.00 ttest Grain-Size Analysis - Sand-Clay, including Hydrometer ....................................... ] 15.00/test Grain-Size Analysis - Gravel-Clay, including Hydrometer ...................................... 155.00/teat Liquid Limit or Plastic Limit ........................................................ 51.00/test Los Angeles Abrasion Test (500 revolutions) .............................................. 109.00/test Los Angeles Abrasion Teat (1000 revolutions) .............................................. 129.00/teat Mechanical Analysis - ASTM D1140 (wash 200 sieve) ........................................ 40.130/teat Mechanical Analysis - Sand or Gravel (dry sieve) ........................................... 60.00/test Zvfcchanical Analysis - Sand or Gravel (wash sieve) .......................................... 76.00/test Mechanical Ana|ysia - Sand and Gravel (wash sieve) .................. ' .......... ' ....... - ....... ! 14.00/teat Moisture Contcnt ............................. ~ .......... · ....................... 8.50/test Moisture-Density Curve (Calif. 216) ................................................... 114.00/test /~{oisturc-Dcnsity Curve for Compacted Ells (4-inch Mold) .............................. ; ....... 120.00 It=st Moisture-Densily Curve for Compacted Fills (6-inch Mold) ..................................... ]36.00/test Molsture-Densily Single Point ................................................. - ....... 56.00/test Pcrmcabilhy (falllag head) ........................ .......... : ...................... 114.00 /teat PcrmcabiJity (constant head) ........................................................ 195.00/test Permeability (trlaxisl: EPA Method 9100) .. .............. ~ .................................. 380.00/test Resistance Value ............................................................... '185.00/test RestsLance Value (lime or cement-treated) ................... · ............................. 215.00/test Restsairily Test (Calif. 532 or 643) .................................................... 73.00/test Sand Equivalent ................................................................ 4{jl.00/test Specific Gravity and Absorption - Gravel ................................................ 54.00/test Specific Gravily - Fine-Grained Soils ................................................... 60.00/lest Su]phatc Content ............................................................... 40.00"/test Triaxial Compression Test (U-U) ..................................................... 92.00/test Triaxial Compression Teats (CD and CU with pore pressure) ........ ' .......... ' .... ............. !~ourly Rates Uncon~ned Compression Test (undisturbed urnpie) .......................................... 51.00/test Unit Dry Weight and Moisture Content (undisturbed sample) .................................... 17.00/teat Special 5amplc Preparation and Laboratory Tc~ng not listed above charged at applicable hourly rates For pcrsonncl TERMS Payment is duc upon presentation of lnvoicc and is past due thirty (30) days from involcc date. Past duc accounts are subject to a finance charge of onc and one-half pcrecnl (1-]/2%) pcr month, or the maximum rate allowed by law. Schedule It Effective 05-01-94 DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED FOR THE RECORD A.J. TERICH ENGINEERING, INC. �� „M CIVIL ENGINEERING • SURVEYING • LAND PLANNING JUNE 13 , 1995 TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL 43174 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE TEMECULA, CA. 92590 RE: PLANNING APPLICATION NOS. 94-0061, 95-003, 95-004, 95-0031 (OLD TOWN ENTERTAINMENT PROJECT AND AFFILIATED PROJECTS) DEAR COUNCILMEN: AS A MEMBER OF THE BUSINESS COMMUNITY IN TEMECULA FOR APPROXIMATELY TWENTY YEARS, MOST OF THAT TIME HAVING BEEN LOCATED IN OLD TOWN, I AM ENTHUSIASTICALLY IN FAVOR OF THE ABOVE PROJECTS. IN THE LAST TWENTY YEARS, I HAVE SEEN THE USUAL UPS AND DOWNS ENCOUNTERED IN THE BUSINESS CYCLE. HOWEVER, THE DOWNTURN OF THE NINTIES HAS BEEN DEEP AND LASTING. THE SIZE OF THE COMPANIES .I HAVE BEEN ASSOCIATED WITH (FORMERLY TO-MAC ENGINEERING AND NOW A.J. TERICH ENGINEERING, INC. ) HAVE GONE FROM AN EMPOYMENT OF TWENTY FULL TIME INDIVIDUALS TO AN EMPOYMENT OF ONE FULL TIME AND THREE PART-TIME EMPLOYEES. I KNOW I AM NOT THE EXCEPTION IN THIS TYPE OF BUSINESS AS I AM AWARE OF LARGER FIRMS THAT HAVE GONE FROM TWENTY NINE EMPLOYEES TO TWO AND, IN SOME CASES, THE REMAINING TWO NOW COMMUTE TO WORK TO A PARENT OFFICE IN RIVERSIDE OR SAN DIEGO. I HAVE NOT SEEN ANY SIGNS OF A TURN AROUND. I FEEL FORTUNATE THAT I AM STILL IN BUSINESS AND WILL KEEP GIVING IT MY BEST SHOT. HOWEVER, WITHOUT A BOOST IN THE LOCAL ECONOMY LIKE THE ONE I FEEL THE ABOVE PROJECTS WILL GIVE TO THE AREA, I AM DOUBTFUL OF THE SECURITY OF MY SUBSTANTIAL INVESTMENT IN OLD TOWN AND THE FUTURE OF TEMECULA IN GENERAL. WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF THE PROPERTY TAXES, SALES TAXES AND EMPLOYMENT THAT THE BUSINESS COMMUNITY PROVIDES TO A CITY, THE BURDEN OF FUNDING FOR MUNICIPAL SERVICES ARE DEPENDED UPON MORE AND MORE FROM THE RESIDENTS WHO WILL INCREASINGLY BE DRAWN AWAY FROM THE AREA TO AVOID THESE COSTS AND BE ABLE TO LIVE NEAR THEIR EMPLOYMENT. RATHER THAN CONTINUE ON THE DIVISIVE ROAD WE HAVE BEEN ON OF LATE, NOT ONLY HERE IN TEMECULA BUT ACROSS THIS NATION, I HOPE THE OPPOSING ELEMENTS WILL WORK TOGETHER FOR THE ADVANTAGE OF THE WHOLE COMMUNITY. I URGE YOUR SUPPORT OF THESE PROJECTS SO THAT WE CAN BEGIN A NEW ERA OF PROSPERITY IN TEMECULA. SINCERELY, A.J. TERICH ENGINEERING, INC. Ad/ ANTHONY J/T ICH, PRESIDENT 41934 MAIN STREET -TEMECULA, CA. 92590 •909-676-5715 /FAX 909-676-6306 1 DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED FOR THE RECORD -?q- /5.' COMMENTS OPPOSING OLD TOWN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT BY ED BURBEE SUBMITTED TO TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL 13 JUNE 1995 INTRODUCTION I submit the following comments as an individual interested in the proposed Old Town Redevelopment Project. Generally, I oppose the project as proposed. My detailed comments appear below in the Discussion section. CONCLUSIONS 1. The project documentation remains inadequate in addressing potential project impacts, traffic in particular. 2. Because inadequate, the project documentation fails to mitigate project traffic impacts. 3. The outcome of the March 7, 1995, advisory vote on the project remains politically non -decisive because of city officials' documented flip-flopping on the issue of city funding of the project. 4. The proposed project conflicts with existing city plans for the Old Town Temecula area. Instead of modifying these plans to accommodate the project, the city should stick with these plans and encourage businesses that fit these plans. 5. The mitigation measure offered in Table S-1 cannot serve as effective mitigation because mass transit information in the absence of a mass transit system exists as mere information, not as mitigation. DISCUSSION Page 3-1. Project Description. Regional Access to Project. This section omits to include and consider project traffic impacts to the Interstate 15 --Winchester interchange and certain associated surface streets. The proposed project fails to identify the I -15 --Winchester Interchange as providing primary local access to the proposed project. This interchange will provide such access because traffic will use it in order to avoid the traffic congestion at the I -15 --Rancho California Road interchange and the I-15 and State Route 79 South interchange. Additionally, traffic avoiding the two identified interchanges will logically divert to adjacent surface streets. Traffic exiting at the I -15 --Winchester interchange could logically follow both Jefferson Avenue and Diaz Road to reach the project site. Finally, local residents attempting to avoid the two identified interchanges could logically follow both Ynez Road and Jefferson Avenue. The proposed project, however, offers no mitigation of traffic impacts to Ynez Road, Diaz Road, Jefferson Avenue, or the I -15 --Winchester interchange. As a result, the proposed project's DEIR remains seriously deficient and inadequate. In consequence of this inadequacy, the proposed project's DEIR and associated documentation fail to comply with the CEQA requirement that the City of Temecula, as lead agency, must consider the proposed project's potential environmental effects or impacts before granting project approval. Furthermore, under state policy, the city of Temecula, as lead agency, should not approve this project as proposed because the city has failed to consider the feasible mitigation measures that would substantially lessen the project's significant environmental effects on the I -15 --Winchester Interchange and the above-named surface streets. Please provide a study addressing and mitigating project traffic impacts to the I -15 --Winchester interchange and above-named surface streets.. For two other reasons, the city should not adopt and certify the documentation associated with the Old Town Redevelopment Project. One, the March 7, 1995, advisory vote on the proposed project remains non -decisive in its outcome. Existing documentation indicates that before this vote, city officials gave the public reason to understand the city would not involve itself in funding this private project. Some voters very likely voted for it believing city officials on this point. Following the advisory vote that narrowly favored this private project, city officials indicated a readiness on the part of the city to apply city funds to it. Passage of the advisory measure probably hinged on the funding issue. So the city cannot reliably formulate public policy using this suspect political outcome. Two, the existing city general plan and the Old Town Temecula Specific Plan (OTSP) adequately provide for rational development of the Old Town area. The city should not amend or replace the existing city plans with the proposed Westside Specific Plan to accommodate the proposed Old Town Redevelopment Project. The entertainment center that goes with this proposed project now conflicts with the existing city plan and the OTSP. The city should keep its existing plans without modifying them to suit the entertainment center and other project elements. In addition, the city drew up the existing city plans by holding many meetings to put together a sensible overall plan. The city should leave it alone. Mr. Buffman's entertainment center at bottom remains speculative and not in keeping with existing city plans. The city should reject Mr. Buffman's proposed entertainment center project. Instead of approving this questionable project, the city should encourage project proposals that fit the existing city plans for Old Town Temecula. Page 1-4. Mitigation Measures, Table S -l. "Mass transit information . shall be provided for permanent employees." This mitigation measure remains inadequate to reduce long-term emissions as applied to project phases I and II. Temecula lacks an adequate mass transit system. The county bus system extends only to Inland Valley Hospital, a point several miles outside the city limits. At present, no connection exists between that point and the city. Only periodic daily Greyhound bus service occurs in Temecula. The small city buses that run part of the day serve only a fraction of the city. No mass transit bus system extends from Temecula to the greater area surrounding it. Hence, mere "information" provided to permanent employees will fail to function as an effective mitigation measure. Please provide genuine mitigation that will reduce long-term emissions to insignificant levels. Ed Burbee Temecula, CA 890393 Telephone 3 DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED FOR THE RECORD 1 Ar M 0/15/9s- AI e s em/ ,.` 04, • • P • 9// //e k/4 r ale gr84, V :/, / ) • e eafh6 Aatkre&ri [ a4h,rniiE3qeaI &h,h3 • /4 4 Irma Jeinetu4 e'u enhyoh itingrient &wk ea Ja(--/ / t/ _ ..i rte= / / + C ,o Y� , e 4' �j// � 1 / `!,(,' ft j(°" 1 r hi 0 v Mc- ilki L7--- 1/7P74 zkpez-g/ -004v4a/ ' I \m1-941(11 Ait ; / , ,,------.1.--Q-c-x-Thz--, -o. it/0 tb,j4410 / `Nrifftw ' // 10-) 0,05,0s(olyi 4 ,,,4 I \ax_1\\o-) r,/,,..e., ,---,)„ -q 0-02(20) Arsoz(f /77r7 //Tr h/ . t ) //7-:.27='-,-2.A52"-- / - / , iir , --,2,--iv(-,/r-2, "3// ' 7/ ' , - / 77/- . ( / /. i AO2---- ----, X•?1,-/r/v-ly /j. 711 ,,,ot 9 IiVI 141 ( // ? / 222(C- 9 ) ) )) ,-1-/ .0/1 t/v,2 //-. i ( c./772a 1 'i) :2 ) ""05 ) __2747k12-ftr(P-p hi ?..(;),77,7-A----=:_7. zc . , ,., / 11 ( . .„,/,,,, / 0 j____ - , '-')12n//:-) 410r#4.—immi. /--i'l / c spy- - ,..,, A. . . - _ . . . 1 A OGUt>6)00 AA:10144.1 LA-A-0/te_44.4..e, LAn- (5,fr,f widytt4c1)JA otu,4LqI 41i, ,i -fvf/-tLAI-- IQ (k& 0 a _ Oat l ?Gi'l .177:1Q , 11, /2 t, , A jj CA\--v op.,,,L -e—_---) 7k- • tY717/ /'zf y DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED FOR THE RECORD YY/zc Old Town Yemecula Entertainment Center_ (70s- - 01.# TO: Mayor Ron Roberts City Manager Ron Bradley City Council We the undersigned represent a large group of property owners and residents in the City of Temecula. Our subject is the much discussed Old Town Entertainment Center. We firmly believe that a project of this nature is extremely necessary for the restoration and salvation of Old Town. We believe that : o Hundreds and hundreds of new jobs will be created. o Excellent employment and educational opportunities for the young people of Temecula will be created. o It ' s a necessary shot in the arm to the Old Town merchants who hava witnessed a constant decline in business over the last few year. o It shall prevent Old Town from becoming dilapidated and run-down. o It will bring excellent entertainment not only for visitors but also for us the people who live right here . o It will improve the roads and parking situation in Old Town and the surrounding neighborhood. c It will increase revenues to the city without creating new taxes for the property owners and residents . The handful of people who say no to this project live in a dream world. Somehow they must have escaped the recession and employment problems that so many of us are trying to overcome . Do not listen to them, we are the majority, we are YOUR majority. Print flame -iiij e 6c yek. Street Address signature .,t7,,46_1,42.427-- City, State, Zip 7P/$-7 .- 0 ;),,i // Print Name /at-#-1 rie'/AC)S'S Street Address - ` 9-290 Signature _, ZC .. ,�. - � City, State, Zip -ei�i Print Name EDw,, t k STERL/, Street Address Signature City, State, Zip iriEcrttAA 6,9 9Z5 Print /lame CLOD' CcdPf Street Address SignatureOZE__ `ne City, State, Zip 1P-Yc is c& C-121 9-2--S iri r9RF i S• .>/It Z"VG Print Mame 1�Tt 1i7t-- -' " - • / � - reet Address y / SignatureL'f/" c. dr' / City, State, Zip l^/1/GGGiZi9 al yo1.s-9.1 Print Name f (-, A 11 y �u L'r S Street Address % Signature to . 410A7___. City, State, Zip j-.P,,,,, � ,, (. re,, 9), 1-F1- Print Name I--Y tk.) .7 A 7)AkAI -S Street Address ( �/ Signature ` City, State, Zip i .,-_• _ J � Print Name Street Address _ Pr int Ilam JO/ ( .c-s. 04) Street Address Signatures ei...ye.,__ ,, ,.e.„...„"J City, State, Zip TE0�=Gu/cda / • fiG.2S's�/ r Print Name --k,Lt,Im'cO Cil Street Address Signature „ , A / ,j , City, State, Zip k eAker t )lam / ) Print dame �51�y4k7rron 6i)gs4c.4l* Street Address Signature S ""-"'' 0---e-- --- -2 City, State, Zip ISIM f t.i 441 CO- of 0 Print flame Ftt-e W y a fit Street Address Signature -6.)'-e` C'(!J City, State, Zip (eAtec,G4 , e '. 92-3"- / , ll • Signature All A�. ._ /_ A.::4i City, State, Zip �yc_e_ �c)j, � &57/ - ii_ Frint Name Gt'14?,lily ACS h., (As gtr eet Address Signature - 4 ': -y, State, Zip 7-2 ry e c t k cA, 9'1 ; Print Flame 1-€6,tt _ QT--e.,_iY "1•\ Street Address Si ynature Ca "-iV,eefd City, State, Zip Tip r-i . (PA- 9-2 / rrint Flame Street Address Print flame c,17Xl-/V-)vb- 46eSjydStreet Address < i Signature , it , \ , AMP" ity, State, Zip _ !i , r'-- 1, 0nl % vZ.S c9"----- wr , Print Name __ lc--- :0; ri�� Street Address Signature -., Adif ,. City, State, Zip 7 n�Cu�-A1 �,q_ `3�5--,9d / Print Mame SAeoee A , Street Address , G 9)-C-"?. Signature Q4; (4 CitState, Zips_ Print flame `A PJS 1_ 0-eiv1 Street Address , Signature (1%C-Efrce-4,difttl'L - City, State, Zip JC'm,t)2-C��rt7, Print Name \tco <cc Stub,Huz_() Street Address - `&�_ c----- Signature I , _ '`•A,/.. City, State, Zip Tih,s_e \c .., Cr Print Name PONK \ C 1,,)\tizykli Street Address Signature Gj m` -vim City, State, Zip �r _C.A.)Lu-1 k CGS- cl2Sc\2 �E''tiz Print Flame �i�'�� � Street Address Signature `. *A- City, State, Zip f �� - Qasy O Print Name Street Address Print !lame 194/47 I/lielG,K- Street Address signature /1� 742City, State, Zip /c.,21 eG6l6a C/7 las-/ Print flame----A- C. ��� Street Address 0 Signature si — City, State, Zip 0 Print Name , vv ' e).- fi�\.(---A Street Address Signature d____CL,...___ City, State, Zip �l� -c� Q> 5 L Print Name /()EG-Aze4. p Street Address -- h'N D�P Signature �/� ,//, i ,,.‘ J City, State, Zi Gee_z-z )--- Print Name fr;an-Rsek Street Address ' ' Signature 13u -/ti-&- City, State, Zip Tvveeu]e L °fz.5-5/ Print Name 4-Pat-AT �:1--C,k Street Address - Signature SJ P� City, State, Zip sIes•fato 1,A4 04 9z5-9i Print Name fR •Z- sz Street Address , -' • ' Signature. _ i . 'Ilk ),0 City, State, Zip V / i, G F?-int Name Street Address Print llama 1-4nna.-(41, R. DOQLcl Street Address Signature 14 " ,, 1C. City, State, Zip levracoliA, CA QZS 7JZ- Print flame -5,11-,v404e/9 o<7, vocid Street Address Signature ,,A44461( ,0x4,1, City, State, Zip TFC �CI)L4, Cif 9.Z.S r9Z Print Name _ Ci'" Street Address „ 1 Signature 1104 City, State, Zi� `C l c,_ U/ t g- Print Name baa God-c Street Address 1 Signature A A f � I ; GAL City, State, Zip TeAryi.Q d_t,c.�., 06 a' 4 Print Name IV 6ci'V f;Ay r2, 0 ti:kir Street Address , Signature nom- ►� g / City, State, Zip e'itrc ( A PA , I Print Name -.? /Uii-�PPLeA, Street Address Signature s , City, State, Zip 7A-1 . C,q- , q Z 59 1 Print flame ` C1F(�N��4�' F7,tE�C'(l Street Address Signature Cp Qkta-t-i-f , jtWit-al City, State, Zip i-0 nvQC-ttet(, (2o,t /2 / Print Flame Street Address 7 Print flame �„ Sz4n/ f e, Street Address signature `Signature 1,1„_ .— cZ` City, State, Zip '1 <„r.,,L,K eo- el.)-51 d IJ . /� ,) ,,„,... Signature efj i, �I /�' City, State, Zip �'-�� NL k3 - 06- • ( q 1 Print Name VC11i11 I LQ •S,U1 11/7fes-` Street Address Signature City, State, Zip I a'� ,�C-4 GA c? 2 1 Print Name 1.-oaf kA ► .171 Street Address Signature 404t., City, State, Zip [K.414/y)( Ll I Cr r''� 5. Print Name 4A-N1)/A /O 6C St Street Address '('-- Signature ,y 46: city, State, Zip le L/ 1 6A- 9Y )- Print Name c_4,,z,N v.;-'K'e- '-f�/_-N Street Address ). Signature _ ( b — City, State, Zip /e.�,.� yam, 5-)72 Print Name �� _ Sjh Street Address &)/� Signature / __ City, State, Zip ,,,. .4i. ; / ' f7” Print Name Street Address _ 7 Print Name ie/6T iliciravo, Street. Address Signature // �� 4671-t— City, State, Zip /�ffigti 7 0/jA5V2 Print Name 4Ca4-11,2( yit t73- 2 44 Street Address Signature [.-4,C'e&/City, State, Zip Ikf&L/4e4, (-)493- 9; - Print Name J /,c ,1e6//}1;100 Street Address ' Signature /0014r V4:/.444.- City, State, Zip L A,,,(:k ( .:IV/ Print Name 674/ 064,S 6il Street Address 1 Signature / ht-e t%"- -_--- City, State, Zip 7:e"i'eC- %a / (' / 1'PJ Doh/s, klikz Print Name 11-- -_ � ,, Signature G hk / City, State, Zip Cl"-eC-c C?/9 l02a 21 Print Name ' GP4rti6— fit d I Y Street Address Signatu e / J 0, ,f - City, State, Zip 0 ri c r 0 11 i Print Name /Z.. J?,<QVC4(/6,77L. street Address / Signature 4,6_,,, ,,C-�------ City, State, Zip rc c:i/so eLv 515" i L Print Name Street Address Print /lame U////4m %/7,-1/11/1 Street Address . Signature 1/k/.4,* Z City, State, Zip ? - (-Q' c7,26- - 7,25 Print flame S ri?-4Nx Street Address Signature (e ).-VQ,— City, State, Zip 72- i - �• 9 :5—9 - Print Name /E,ctil Street Address ' Signature z„ tee, ,,x- City, State, Zip .‘:,,eK/a1/4_ �� 525-7D Print Name ) Street Address Signature Whir ' City, State, Zips JQ Y cA/.1 Com. (? 5q` Print Name Cox ro 1 Street Address • Signature AirilaI "City, State, Zip T iite ;t( C4 7 Print Name /NA i-t1t4t, Street Address Signature; ,l ,_.�.j City, State, Zip tCL✓(A cel - Print Name I . cc h(f lea Street Address / Signature IWO ,' Q� , City, State, Zip24G1,' Gt C'/4 2r,L S Print Name Street Address 7 Print Mame J ' S z_- Street Address / Signature ��y/1111A11//,/lQ�- City, State, Zip {ue cU (q C�} Print Name , L r n S Street Address _ Signature � l �-^�� City, State, Zip tsi►tiLcc- 4-: 72S Print Name Pe 1-le X J ✓,ick' st.reet Address ,/ Signature ate i raitAA City, State, Zip !c%yY L- (!& 9 2----5-7,v2. Print Name tjar,dk Natd6 0 Street Address Signature % � .; „�� , �- , _ City, State, zipr"-'uc,. )� : Print Name . � © • Street Address MESignature City, State, Zip /fii,e r c,/ Print Name L)`,;,;»Zc� L Oo\ Street Address � , Signature � , 4) City, State, Zip `� rc� �c �, b cj7` a Print Name //eag zeiL cZ- Street Address i Signature '+� City, State, Zip �C476Ck c.f; C' C-Zd- 0 Print Name Street Address / Print Flame .4 /►,// 625 L k Street Address / g eZa 'l;�l� .��d�� City, State, Zip J9t4 f� ..? , Si iiatur Print Name , l2 X 1 4 E �cz', Street Address ,-, Signature //41-(-----Q ,�O City, State, Zip t-f`t-'e a ,Vie, 9 - 7 Print Name Se Street Address / Signature , / , City State, Zip 's' d_./ -1.11c r .�c Print Name ',,,ti g le'oP� Street Address r �� �• C� 92S?d Signature j �, _4 ,A1,.. ._ City, State, Zip ( � c Li � Print Name ?OA r; cia ,6?4 I ww' ' Street Address ( ? Signature fee; ,i7e4„`.siictCity, State, Zip Tvjeccc Ie ( Z 5-el Print Name LAkc-6 /c E Street Address 5 Signature e2-c.��� 't City, State, Zip koma '' i °1 //e5� i Print Name Jeflfl1f ( IKbb0,50n Street Address - Signature 4'.,r�_,rr Ai, .a%Ld-ZYi � jy, State, Zip /7 fld/O 7 :C✓9 Print Name Street Address _ D S;tPrint Name _Urrtreet Address � - � ..0// � signature J /greeziii/, City, State, Zip C4 ce ;z 4 Print Name "l/aell AL211( Street Address . C -f /Signature / /4,4/ 2• z City, State Zip eLeL, 4 , 2S-WPrint Name Al„ di , N Street Address Ae') 7:25;:7;2a4C..441 Signature A „ iv- 4, / City, State, Zip Print Mame ,. ` / jG��� treet Address ���_ -_moi Sid - - r- /�� /��% City, State, Zip 7� e 9,:k4- 2 Print Name L , i / Street Address Signature / 1140117City, State, zip mo JetnallA i.` 1 Print Name (4,,zi ;77-,.////,„5 Street Address ;/, Signature , �� City, State, Zip ../pl'*w,A, 2am f' 9'..Z. 'f l Street Addressskit/ Signature LA11/116 City, State, Zip c_ (A (; 591 um ! 1 Print Name (1/iark - dick Street Address Ate6115: Ienlec / C4 9 2-S II N4, 5 - t=4/J Y.-.4 QPrint flame \ QnL, Street Address �� Al Signature. / , 0 City, State, Zip ( @d& 5u ( IF , Print Name to, .,, �r�� - - Signature ;,. . AV /, City, State, Zip ,C ���i 9c759c; Print Name ) ' `ari l S Street Address Signature ---LCity, State, Zip-7-LT) , /Jq . qt,VSQ�—_. Print Name itlf V f : IA Street Address l/Signature ,� City, State, Zip Jeal2GCtk/ CA 12-5/ ( ll I Print Name �N 5', , / treet Address Signature /p./__ _ a.�.,. City, State, Zip 1F /.14 - , 94,A57/ Print Nam_ `I I •, N, ,✓ Street Address . 16 i�'�9 k / l�ieFeoe� SignatureA j'Ae-14,' City, State, Zip _ � �� lZ.sz Print Na - ', L .1 W fr4reet Address ) VIA"Signatu • : di ':;��,,,,! 44. . 1�l I ity, State, Zip Le4110"4/0 OA . 0c 'A) l6 ' I Print. Namealkunh � ��� Street Address rt rn Co `�" 2 s 7— `% print- 11ame Ibo,kiti:A IN) IL c , p-6� Street Address Signature (a _ ( 4 City, State, Zip ,. ( e-,,/ q 3 9 2 , Print flame ; Y fyp - ji Street Address � Signature LA412 City, State, Zip i 1C�p� Q a / 5�� Print /lame r ( ((,`!)/0 Street Address - Signature 4 , js-C,_._m City, State, Zip MTyt Lord AL. (k426-11 Print flame 74)0 P" oCr-l-er' Street Address ,. Signature i ,1ikiitA City, State, Zip ----rice, ca"S.9a / Print flame ofiYats Street Address ( Signature _ City, State, Zip -Ce) a___ Print Name ,Q,r,e4k._ /Street Address Signature �Ii, ,,, dilt„ ,_�,� City, State, Zip �j�E(>//4}/ t 9'61-5- Print asPrint Name jiS,,qe✓,�/7,5) Street Address - Signature C 1j2� �,_ , City, State, Zip ,c,.&,IZDL A 9 Ya&, Print /lame Street Address 7 Print tlatttegA �lV C/I Street Address Signature 4„te,, City, State, ZipJfrrYlv_e_a_-&_. (A C -,--4,1s--630 Print Name /`/,-7rieei✓}l'A Street Address / / Signature / City, State, Zip 111111 i - OsL. 56%1-193 Print Name re_?(. tl ./ 1 5'0 n/ Street Address , . , ,,,, Signature 4.,e e„,_..4-,ti City, State, Zip o �..,� gz.-e2f , ,-1"90 Print Name it; //V ) f ,S,r/1i Street Address - __ /�� Signature / _ __,_, City, State, Zip c bac. 7,,Z,4-pz Print Name Jp 1 vt/ f w o R d c Street Address ! Signature -2 ,, ‘) City, State, Zip .:L' ea. l026.-5). 7,. 7 Print Name / & ., ,1 ,4,,..47,__ Street Address ,9 Signature C�o// S4110t1J f se_Y City, State, Zip amu„ �l %.,,i .5 ` 81 Print Name i,f/VA/ f/ 40/M-6 Street Address Signature , , .i, 11-7/Lii City, State, Zip c 44, , / ?$9Z Print Name Street Address V" Print /lame • 1h\, A \> Ili St:- et Address * Signature Wad' . �\ !".ity, State, Zip \\A 111. V • Qfi Print Name ivv c e 12-7-, Z/ 07 jek. Street Address . gI: Signature r 3 ;_ City, State, Zip rca:,e4,,. iu.i Ca . q.2 )-17-- I, Print Name VE,A'r-‘c;e,._ Z, c1, (e.,A Street Address Signature `y"��n.� \2A.*QA_,_J City, State, Zip Tient_`,, CA.. _ 945-q Print Name / r T h n Sir( 4-/— Street Address Signature , A L"l•' AI 14 City, State, Zip irre. CUin (f 2c-4/2- Print Name //(-x/(61./ i/4< / Street Address � Signature AANV,7 A—NV, City, State, Zip l t6'"Z i- , C4. 92S 9Z _ ,- Fri nt Name /Woe /-44j v_/ Street Address _: �� SignatuL e i City, State, Zip/j ,, " /, '_/fe -// Print name ANNN E. C.-f)-(i_taio Street Address (` Signature V j, E-. VALLI% City, State, Zip 'ewer, , Com- - //7S6 Print Name Street Address L Print /lame ,11A/,‘• & r Street Address � Signature / City, State, Zip o. 42,2 / / Print Name /3 �ti. �11� Street Address 0027 , Signature 34,1,C.5 We CISG1 City. State, Zip 02Y/6 A4,Avt rM / "1l Print Name 26f1 , Street Address ; Signature 11) �C� 1 City, State, Zip ' i c x-, 4'25 '/ Print Name ,g: oK, iL., Street Address4 Signature ,� , /!%� , , City, State, Zip4 - FoZSYy Print Name A'1 ( I4_ K i ( IL-P, uI'iCK Street Address (-( Signature City, State, Zip �- -vV1�c4..1Gfc CfL 9 2_S'' Print Name 0404/11/4t._ i L.),,Jait, ._ Street Address Signature (442a.4fi'�----cl �. City, State, zip 6,(1- 9€-05 Print Name `,,/ 0e14-' //�� Street Address � ` Signature I_�/ ' , City, State, Zip rit, 06 • Print Name )2)-PYVnr-DoM 1n Street Address 10\51„v r_` e Print deme frieRV2 41)As Street Address / Signature i; i /rA City, State, Zip ,@.UJa J (_.-w/ 4 / r Print Name ✓c iv /D/S Street Address -eedfdi te, Zipc4% N44..</ City, State, Zip( -ix". /zic (-7.6u52-s--P Print Name /4:‘,4W /6/97-,;M Street Address A v /a Signature 486 City, State, Zip :f/Au J , � 6' . 7.257Z Print Name ()MINN. (1) Street Address � Signature k0W1✓ C'L)'---U14*-- , City, State, Zip c--' ""`�C�`^� ` C-1-02. -- Print Name ch( Ikr NcIfl -Q- Street Address Signature ��(^11S ,_ ity, State, Zip .1fcu-ecc,<,E.ct_ Co, qZ 91 / Print Name PA- RIC li CovE y Street Address Signature _ _ , City, State, Zip 7-4A-1(7--7 CvL!51- CA` , r-2--S 727— 44 a� ' Print Name — 1�� r. et Address•• i ! St — � Signature AT_ City, State, Zip 1., , . ' _ 1 `T c_, CA1 , 6 ZSR 1 Print Name Pa/ 114,0krr Street Address Print Ilam?— Street Address _‘ ,' "- t State, Zip \�Q - . N r Signature ��,� �Pi� Y� �; "�\. Print flame hi rir/ i sir i79 Street Address il / Signature "_._ _ .II ' _-1 City, State, Zip Print Name . (43-e/C12740/2/7/61T-reet Address i gnat . � ��-� //��� _?- / .%,, y, State, Zip 6 y 21-Frith )lame c j11�w Street Address Signature .,`� City, State, Zip lea) . Cc _1a59 .D ri Print flame a a �I_ ' A Street Address Signature \s1-- City, State, Zip -fern CO._ 9aS9Q _ Sh Print Name SKai4_,_i "'� Street Address gAgA-1P-A4)_nignature ( 1ty, State �1 -T - / ` Signatureate_ __ _.__ City, State, Zip pr, ,�,.'; /_ / , 41 Print flame Street Address 1-` D k Print. Hanle LE . vW 130L.Lii Street Address / AO /� I , City, State, Zip �� G�C� ( _J S i.ynatur.E� 0„. ./..,_ print flame _____.-___01-9_, R.1 .- 1CA I A4 Street Address , Signature • - Ill -( c"---- ---. -- ,• __ __ City, State, Zip �SLr/SG� tJz,,4 ( 4Z-57/ 4\ Signature __ .-',r � -4th„., City, State, Zip \ ► • A kli qR1d Print flame .e3. &s _ Street Address signature City, State, Zip ,Y,c kca Cl g. IV Street Address Print !lame Signature jQ, a G N -',1,3 City, State, Zip Jac .C-F) .412' 1 ('�� /� Address ; 0°- 1Address Print 1] �®_ � a ,,, A/ Street nature 1 •� , City, State, Zi ab- aS Print Ilarne 4s 1,1,- a ii Street Address �// Signature �/` City, State, Zip hitV a.: Print dame V11tWr 1 Md / Street Address G r Signature -ji As! . , .1t City, State, Zip 1— ,Vr' _ Print /lame l j;T,: rt" ' -treet Address signature � � !yA;A, City, State, Zip � s_)(A, C)(2-3-e5,( Print /lame RN I W ; \Sor Street Address Signatureda.,, 9 , I a a ano-1 City, State, Zip TexnQJ u.k 1 ( d2Sci ) Print Name lit -0 a I Street Address ���- - Signature , 4/44‘d __ C - i . er/ City, State, Zip /??/AM,tp i Z Print /lame ,vlatiti� , •��f/ Street Address ,;? ". & / City, State, Zip •'fi'/�, ��� � `GGs• Print Name Street Address _ ok Print tame r�prl _ S(3,fIia-c_D Street Address . � /ty, State, Zip 0 CQ . 9268 Signaluxe ��'p„`_" 1_— i / Print flame �� (,( Street: Address / / '/ / Signature itc A .i /...,,,, City, State, • ✓•... • 1 ei/—eo. g( • Print Name .,, erlc*i(C)astY0 Street Address signature `, �- _. i, -v_. City, State, Zip jai,...._. (4 g q2.1 _ Print flame . r)n `� Street Address Signature •1,1 ),,,_ City, State, Zip ) Ca-NuA) AQ, C.1k ??59/ crft,--P Print name _ (,.1 LSCc&a.vi,\-e. Street Address Signature ___.aVn ity, State, Zip �2Y1\k,t_il i 9 133 _ Signature _ ,m,°',0- City, State, Zip �,2,1,„ -a_r IA6( i-�' __12 ,..a.cgL4 17-59 I Print Name \ — C A s Street Address Signature 4 . ./ �" ity, State, Zip C 6 -)q S( I. F'r int-t- [lame ____ _ Street Address - 0R Print. flame FA 1iChQft( 1_ , rods Street Address ;i.ynatur.fr III / // On -City, State, Zip ./ ,r• Print flame I-.Z: 42Street: , Signature • IA City, State, Zip / e .' Print Name - -' r4't &V\ Street Address -e " i gnature _ U/1,---' City, State, Zip ILmeiAktix (IN 9 2-s9 Z_ /4144/1_ tv65 Print fame '_ Street Address -' Signature — City, State, Zip _ 92-5-5/ Print flame '<4;4 / Street Address Signature r /' / 1 City, State, Zip �A46 '" . ?Y- / i i4,/ " Print Name � 1� Signature City, State, Zip (Qrac�? 3-9; Print flame Afi /7e2/ r Street Addrr s _ iff Si.gnatttr.l 411,11:44City, State, Zip ,,.. I/ ,Lr g ') Pi i►rt flame Street Address - Print flame. __ IL _ Street Address , L S . y�iatur.e. 'ity, State, Zip / l . -- Print flame 0 .4 4kta5Street Address Signature yi%lli/!- /I�.. ' City, State, Zip Print Name /2./e—s .4 Z—e.017 Street Address Signature v City, State, zip /4l '17 -S_V Print flame �Oyt( Aig0/0 Street Address S i.gna tur B'N�( iageti City, State, Zip __[ P-1/46 ) G UL `;s9. ' 42 Print Name • � Nit is Street Address Signature 61 A/_ ! .%#• City, State, zip .per (j-a-Vt, • Print Name /� ' -0 , Street Address Signature /IPWr City, State, Zip a Print name � � �` --_- Street Address �� Signature City,() � � ---! City, State, Zip (Ra.",, (.1 - Print. Name Street Address - Of\ rr i nt !lames /e;c75 -0CJ�� ' Si. natur.e0. ? _,_!j4L,..„2.s.____ City, State, Zip ,47„,,,,,a, 4:- 7�..1 1_ __ Or Print !lame :1---D-43(A> Street Address ),, !) ( City, State, Zip J E 1�ECu\� SiSignature _ _��--11—I C . Print Mame /I/,6 11 ,,'i Street Address Signature ://),, I / '/ ity, State, Zip ��/V1,0/0f CTI q,25-;/ Print !lame ----r �, C � Street Address _ r 9 Signature City, State, Zip pAcC-v � l . 4i Print blame 1v. , IL - Street Address ` Signature ririt�„ 4...4 _...,. City, State, Zip ('fA ' . k / L, '� Print Name .3VA hC HO \ Ueltreet Address t Signature v/" `" /,' 10104 / lity, State, Zip ` s e1UO c Offt i Print nt IName . OW C- .!:nri kr Street Address • Ar? Signature IA I i_: ' f.,/ A / / City, State, Zip � pcuJ LQ 9&592 g _ / ['tint !lame Street Address - o I' rt int. tlamr1 MARY. ___ 0-E- Street Address Sly !latur.e AUM60:7— City, State, Zip \ 1 tai 64 ' 6: a7 r' c Print flame 1 °_I�' Street Address Si nature 6.1. AL City, State, Zip L- Llil ' ' ... &. _ 111 // Print Name irk P _� [//��y��Cv� Street Address ' A' , .__. signature y ._ ,._0/179/)Md City, State, Zip ,�`-�_ ./ 9 Print flame l I Street Address SignaturQ •4) 41. City, State, Zipâ _ 75?_ 40111 Print (lamp ----f ...C:...C; , j Stxeet Address -- Sign Q.. _ �/, /0i City, State, Zip , 77.7 C 9,257/ " Signatures • `►' : / , v• ne City, State, Zip 1.,)iLC CIE • gC - ll III Print flame 36Ce 1 0j0-901-M°1.17( Street Address , J Signature ./ ,(/ ,����� City, State, Zip �6�Z q /. I Print Name Street Address - 04, Print name 7014// 410N " 'Street Address > Siyriatur-e �� ,r `. City, State, Zip '7,. . n-,0^.i r.4?3-5%*9)___ /� ,� � � ���� ? .. Signature ( � 1.1 ,C.c_ 10 /'µ City, State, Zip �� 7��'i-ic.i (' / - - ��. 'Print tlanle P. D//)elf (- L1 Street Address Signature 11 ` /�dA<- _ City, State, Zip /P7tilL`G64(441, C>fi9 . ��i`v 1�_� Print flame JH1 Ha i 'Oelii A>' Street Address 14 Signature 11 ‘4,, ,..._ City, State, Zip 74E77067-6 /9,�i'�' ,'7 Print Name 01 A4 :.L_ Street Address Signature %Iv - . i€ - City, State, Zip I e CAI/A ) C . `1 -Sc1 1 A � nnDDII , ^ I Signature 00 — — City, State, Zip l FLU'r 01- 99.5712- If Print flame \VINITE MA V\3Street Address Signature 9 i!„ 1,� 1l a , . ity, State, Zip , - ' , , _ _ _ S- 2 Print. name Street Address 1 aik• Print Name PftS Ypf-t-es Street Address Signature `-. ,..\114(...6OA 5: 1 City, State, Zip l, 'E'vy\Pc 1,d n- `A C./ •,,S-- .. J Print Name ` `,aa.Jtf, Street Address Signature 4_4,441)(40 City, State, Zip C" lesIL KAA_t✓A r cA 42SQL. Print Name 11,..)n(4 .Z, .k S `, Street Address Signature ,$,,,,TA ,_.0_ City, State, Zip �.�,Nee iklQ CO, c\ 5 • 41 Print Name '‘'\S phvr 6_Co'r el( Street Address Signature C3.---EL,5 L City, State, Zip 1-1( vnec,•.k4 CA 1 Sas---? Z Print Name OEVVA1 i SL6 A 11)4/6 Street Address , Signature ) r 7a City, State, Zip .jKvy,,zeoL A ) e. A 1:2s‘-'q __ Print NameZ/at7; 4--Ci< Street Address Signature57 City, State, Zip ` ? ' 'vl4 Print Name !✓ AN WOOD Street Address Signature oDe2_0,0 AVCity, State, Zip 7- riff1' CUCA1 (P' 12_1 Print Name Street Address _ oR s ,, Frirrt flame J � R I �, �A�l� Street Address / - Signature , ,/f / ,�� City, State, Zip � pEkliZetALo C�� /2$/2 Print Name ( 7 & � ' � �;_ Street Address Signature \ e-ity, State, Zip' C)" Print Name A S Street Address Signature A __ City, State, Zip 1;;;;ec;QL, 6 92597_ Print Name ND // ' ,8a(51 '61/ Street Address , IV" Signature / / / ' / City, State, Zip w�f &ef f26g2 I Print Name / � A fl") Street Address Signature City, State, Zip i, /nL'('i.( la� Ci9 7gt9g Print Name ( .\ W\ ( p Street Address -- Signature 1�. ;�. City, State, Zip - Print Name Street Address Signature10-41L/OITC:-/‘-) City, State, Zip I LO1.f 9- 12 � / 2---- Print Name Street Address 6 A. Print Name C.IA0S'hAQ k_fikail Street Address Signature .►iJA NiC 11Cit y, State, Zip .aa561 - , Print Name Street Address Signature A ! ,,• ,L.,�, „ City, State, Zip 1-€..YheCul� C C75 — / Print Name f2i22-t Ukt.)6 Street Address - Signaturel.A V City, State, Zip Pry ,. [ L' CZ CCL .0 GLZ Print Name \ V_,_ . , j Street Address Signature 1 it\ � - till ': City, State, Zip t�lAVI�GCt.2 Yz - J . Signature ..., , _ ,1. .1 :. , ity, State, Zip /.x1/14_iUtG_ i CA .129E1 / Print Name Z ‘M Street Address\ Signature \- \-\\.)., City, state, zip .4` JSA � \V.:) Cil Print Name Vat /g"' A Street Address Signature City, State, Zipi( JL4 CA 92-5(3 Z Print Name Street Address Print Dame SCOT% y.:47-k%ZfdwStreet Address � �/ r''� 1 Print Name -%r174/‘ &i.e./140-e Street Address A- -!!3tc;E) Signature City, State, Zip /M/rzaede O 7TSL3 1 Print Name AI,J 2 0, V Street Address /# °/ S ignatur- PM"%,./ City, State, Zip e� Q (V - .��� pv A./1) Print Name _�`, '. : Al ' / A./1) SO Street Address , 7��'�'`�� 171111111W Signature • a —� City, State, Zip -� ' 1(2t'c,J 4/C,4 CIV 0 Print Name JG , Street Address . :. Signature -; _ , City, State, Zip ey�u,,,lo,. (M cZ, 7 Print NameaC Street Address , i Signature --C4 4ty, State, Zip "IE V\QS, Jk2 Qo 2 Z Print Name IA, VA // / 0 17Ot4et Address i Signature '//f A. I� City, State, Zip f /j/f Q',a ja (lit 92 O OF \.._.) Print Name Street Address Print Mame E1"\f\ ?OH-Er Street Address Signature & I,r\ &.,., City, State, Zip edOnEC:V (AA QaSiLis J Print Name DI-f G6f'1.9 4 L mac' Street Address Signature Ata, City, State, Zip te-77,1 -t=7 Z-4f eg ?2 -r Print Name 3eA N (Q 6-6/lz ,e Street Address Signature C, ity, State, Zip Print Name SONE Street Address Signature 4eb. ,I , ./ cif y, State, Zip 1?M UL1\ CA C` -s l� �� KSI (724Print Name �� (�_��j Street Address _ Signature \rdQ.Q� City, State, Zip Teil,u2a,(AQa Print Name `1�C S W ?J Street Address Signature I City, State, Zip T w►f clAiK (, Lk q2.`;11 Print Name 60 (--C I i l.t Street Address " • Signature /j/ City, State, Zip fl - I' C4 9750 Print Name Street Address (,2 Print Mame 122AJ/a 2 blsg Street Address Signature .‘4;P_ City, State, Zip �.//�'7Pdk l# 9.42c.9,7 Print Mame 1104-7-1,. /4J/' • - Street Address S ' g ��cY 7�c— �� r,PCity, Zip ,/,/,,,,-/e7;(__ C>' 92e'02._ Si mature / State, Print Name ( /Q/1.) � Street Address • Signature Abit e,0 Ojed City, State, Zip yl14 ii-, (G, yastra Print MameT/j�ilki,ur`, Street Address Signature a/Atrgi—Ce/LK_A___, City, State, Zip ,2`)rflF/6 / ?;lj Print Name SemiZ4 A/Zif Street Address ( Signature City, State, Zip �''��/I Cf}. (. Signature k i City, State, Zip Trm-Pc- � ck , 97), Y1 I Print Name I \t'` 'om \ e C4 s Street Address Signature — - CiT.y, State, Zip , , le, r C f Fci , Print Name Street Address 0 R, Print name '6 J7VPEI1SSI Street Address Signature u 1.2 atiS City, State, Zip J�iycceRdi CY 92Sg1- Print Name --✓r 4JL0A Street Address Signature A -£�ap, City, State, Ziple1-76 I `7'*- 5'P/ Print Name i 'ek S'46.4_ s' Street Address Signature �f. ,/ r City, State, Zip --;/%7W-Ce 9C90 �, Print Name AL np� Yt-4-5 Street Address - 7I- / Signature L. (2 ,-I--- City, State, Zip -----72,„„0,, , Ciaof asc).? Print Name , 1/ Vie Street Address t�/ Signature Ar /,'� . f. , / City, State, Zip 74, -6/� 51 OF Print Name f4JScJ6(. 1)'�,u7 _ Street Address Signature , !4/Idtj6 Lpp ( % Ct.y, State, Zip 7-ritf("av(A (DA- 9�1�,/ Print Name / �� � �I • treEet Address w d i Signature ( :. .*, ' 11.,, '7ity, State, Zip ��°�.,QR, . 9, � Print Name Street Address 0 \ Print flame WV.. /IMfa1£? Street Address . Signature '= ���— City, State, Zip �r7IG ZL ,q, Gig - SZ Print Name A, L ' A.//v4- / . -c Stt?et Address � cc liA /� ? )-)-7 Signature �/,�,.a ie -a�. �^ City, State, Zip Print Name d - Street Address _ Signature � City, State, Zip 7:0 . 9 `�� Print Name PCOA✓ .S7AQ-3 Street Address Signature City, State, Zip Print Name 4 '3'��\ �s��\S Street Address % Signature City, State, Zip > « ~ �.S\Q\4 Print Name cjscsy\c, C ikj\C v‘o I c Street Address ` i Signature �4 . ♦ , , . c t..)\c,na`-C City, State, Zip TetticF c JCL ( a ( ?3--yi Print Name a ;d_.., C._Y.: % .: Street Address `, � / Ii Signature Addy, / �; i/ 0 ity, State, Zip /-9___441 ecL(7 L}-i CA Print Name Street Address _ Print /lame ( Int 6...),12 -04 Street Address . Signature liAl '4. _ (4--- City. State, Zip icwm. . l: g2,59 z . Print Flame � l ��Vte- CALs6 A Street Address Signature ' ,Jif • 0 • ;C 1, City, State, Zip - op, clz_s9Z I lh r ,_55 - e& &/' Print Name 1 / LL . _, / 1,/, -treet Address � Signature City, State, Zip7:eilteeZt /a elci Print /lame . j 11 M Ku i cJ 1 Street Address ' -- Signature ql.t--,-- C-\k City, State, Zip (A 4 J-4- z-- Print Print Name G/`v✓ L. ,L/JUDEA:IAA, Street Address Signature / A . • , 44_,,,,,, , .,, City, State, Zip li-m� iC4 . 9�7Z Print Name LatireN Di PnoJ�Street Address Signature /-4 11 1 k ` '', t, . t 1,City, State, Zip Tel-OTU /cj; ( . (Wqr) 1 Print Name /i; $, 01/41,1„._ ,...4.;..:�. Street Address _k Signature r\ '► „ , ;, , )_ City, State, Zip -J2/Yvvz(„U,Jo. COL q&9? t Print Name Street Address Print /lame :Yu) `e-- L. I, +moi Street Address < Signature / .Aiii,, City, State, Zip -f/-� / 0 Print Name .43; ; Print flame IA CA/ Q. W h tiepAleStreet Address / Signature ..ACity, State, Zip( wzs J , Print Name (Z‘O- 123..11c..-1- f._, Street Address Signature ::: ,, c____ City, State, Zip Tt v1EcuCr4- CA. et 2.51-z_ Print Name A, • , ,\ / _ Street Address --) 4 Signature 2(No hLLOaj t— City, State, Zip �: ��p'c"2A9 C/1 Ks Print Name 0,4 i , 4 Street Address ' : Signature i ,j��,. - City, State, Zip -- _ _ . -- <:�_/, • 4 Print Name 4 f Al 1 ,4 F4 reet Address ' Signature ;' ( 1 .4•,, t State Zi q� �� g L�..r . ,� y► P Print Name ( I /, ; ! 11 _ Street Address ¼/ ? �ZSignature 7 J City, State, Zip4/'/VILCCU /� r lJ CCPrint , a \ . Street Address Id Signat e/ ICC, �,. City, State, Zip SIA Cd7t2s1), Print Name Street Address Print /lame /1 t'Aft ,e, -1, L,,Street Address � ��`'� Signature (N.-6 .-city, State, Zip e-e.4, `==)-"5 `r Print Name 2CMJM7' I' Street Address Signature0,AiLte.,,X.I., City, State, Zip7t*::, eccile- C& Signature `- L,-1--- ( ?) City, State, Zip sur- CO - s?a Print Name 1 eSSk.� 7,2.0 cv\, Street Address Signature ' jAd► t 1/ ' ty, State, Zip '�-42.0.ec. 3 �� -k Print Name 1.! ,,,r_, -<r0' Street Address Signature , / City, State, Zip (L4 Print Name t r,5/' Street Address i_, Signature ",dip, zt Z261- City, State, Zip 7'-e6- -c (,/�lx , P Ir �. Print Name NE1 +Y Cs(1M E f Street Address It ) 1 gin ' Z no n�b-4, VE Signature .,SIA , - City, State, Zip (T & _ _► ) • r- Print Name Street Address Print /lame �/' fkA l R. ;y� /I street Address CS (( Signature 3;Aytt.....„....eepp ,? , City, State, Zip Print Name L '/'' 576Xp7c2S.4-/ Street Address Signature ,1"/:4,1 Z/Le..,..te,/ City, State, Zip -t ,ec,-x4 ( ems, 2_ Print Name jLealprc D.9veciro Street Address Signature / ,•,,,;L 6 ! ,.,t: City, State, Zip ea 9.4s9,:2, Print Name c N D1 S 1 I Vgstro Street Address " ---- Signature PSignature oac--i 40‘ City, State, Zip e,4, 2-4579-7- . Print Name /141CIIA L 11, 1 ,J Street Address Signature 4 ,'' „! City, State, Zip j ii�clG#}- al , .ZS9( Print Name Gibe ' , Aii.-1,3,-- Street Address Signature r v ,,1 .A . .%14 City, State, Zip / 6' , �i- %1S7/ � / Print Name Yc`, , u , t' , treet Address Signature 114,;_ `, 4 / 1 " ,, , City, State, Zip �,,_ _ __ ___ _6 Print Name Street Address (/ PN Print nameK4 ,11:b. b,00__ Street Address , ;i.yttatur.e 4 .b6� City, State, Zip juc ( g75%(9 dif/4 /,�j' � ��print Name ,A/ Street Address Signature 14A",/ 1,,;( Ciy, State, Zip l J 1�0f . f// Print dame _ i A ' \ � Street Address �._ I *I I 9 S i nature i t ite. _ City, State, Zip 7fl 'I,f' - l __-__ Signature . 1 ('A''•~ e-`-5E11-'/4ES City, State, Zip /7/Nev � 70?.5- / Print Name o ;�,t,_ . k`,. V,, 1 Street Address0,! ..__ Signature moi_ _ �I.ucr City, State, Zip em,_ e via. , cl.;•. `I Print Name �\ ,-,y,,,v, e''(\," .uU Street Address Signature %.t -7 / efl, City, State, Zip :.4,(.(,1 ( II (/vim /4-2 .__ Print Name ' ��` 1 �r,�;, Street Address Signature //, City, State, Zip 1S n'wi .. ti i, CA Ps " 4/E r1 int. dame Street Address .._..___-- Print !lame fith-1'64 b e.vnes- Street Address / �.lN�R, S3i.ytiatut e �c . � City, State, Zip T GrA �0. I oZ 5�I r�- — r Print !lame _ g/4_,S M. ,Dock Street Address . Signature ire' t1Air _ City, State, Zip erip.e4S, nS79-Z • Print Name /Y`- 1K . Street Address . ' � Signature , \i _ City, State, Zip ar'►2 c,, q(26- '72, _ 010 Fruit flame / , � reet Address signature 14/LJ ,hJ / /4I�nai qty, State, Zip e a 9.--35-9--, v Print dame h I 'V Street Address _� 112,0j,0Ca_ASignature ' `�✓ v��City, State, Zip ' ' Po fl - b •2_7-"--( treet Addressas„-...) ` . ,oFri»t rl� ��- ww Signature ,1'�'' ,illi � City, State, Zipkm-6 c- L L �- ��- 11 ► r ���1 � Print Flame Street Address Signature _ ____ City, State, Zip Print. ?lame Street Address Print flame 04(//40 /9/51°4- /A/4 Street Address : ,. Signature /Gr Yea/A.4, City, State, Zip ,€c x,,, 6, %�35 y Print Name � \AVV 1 C.h.((Z" Street Address Signature lime a -N. Au City, State, Zip `761.-7026-C4169 C P D5�1, Print Name Street Address Signature City, State, Zip Print flame Street Address Signature City, State, Zip Print Name Street Address Signature City, State, Zip Print Name Street Address Signature City, State, Zip Print flame Street Address Signature City, State, Zip Print Name Street Address Print dame t PC- A e Street Address Signature ,(M ' City, State, Zip TTri-iFc0c.4 / CA). / 9eSTZ Print Name 4/92 Om_ / Street Address , A Signature /PIP'"-e---- City, State, Zip eLApcJ A-iCi. j �2 /.— Print Name i/ %lLiii//Street Address Signature i 6 rno- City, State, Zip -1 (?LdL all- 9A5'7.,1-- Print Name ! ,/ I , if, ! I. Street Address • � Signature . .,. , _/ 411 ,r City, State, Zap I., r t-1 91.2 r gib- Print Name it ',ea Ati, Street Address ( Signature5Z:it/I/ACity, State, Zip 6= (� 9;2S% Print Name !mob c�� a, Street Address / Signature Ake ' I City, State, Zipg:adal C 9',,;,,,S-77,-,„2- Print Name I„ , _ 1, Its, Street Address ... Signature AIL f 1i° \tib Cit �-9NlQciA 4 2--Zg .1�� . .�, Y. State, Zip Print Name Street Address Print !lame 9 " - /0 //' Street Address Signature / City, State, Zipr��a i�L1 C.7 - /`2�� , Print Name OD\--Vk-12 V_CN6Ireet Address I Signature \ ,t,, . I ,_' /City, State, Zip • __ ' / S Il Print Name /O//t R. I to Street Address , Signature l K -c _ City, State, Zip 7 e ,,. tQJC ,24 , Print riameG &/ / `Z Street Address /. Signature , , _�// i _.4. ty, State, Zip/ ---9,, , e�z.J��Z-.5:1� � I7 Signature MAW i ;, City, State, Zip I' w J 6,-, 925922 II Print Name �wpnoc C. /('Q,-.,,'rez Sr Street Address , tojCsk-,, f P. , City, State, Zip %/4/e(L-r{, C / ' s g Z Print Name n,.LGteiln Ra+'14-1-z Street Address ' Signature fez 7Qc v City, State, Zip Teme cu is ec 92592 Print Name rn!i _ , 1. Street Address `,, ! 1 (Q M P( 0 f 4 . C4 92.--??.- it/ 2--?Lit/ Print Name Lukict, Clyy Street Address Signature /,/I/ ,� �_I4 ., City, State, Zip T'2' c1Ul ) •9` I Print Name A\ e) 9.0 L , Street Address t Signature City, State, Zip e ✓tiLe(--�\(& C-c1 et 2 SV2 Print Name '- ayQl DaV1060 Street Address Signature J(,Q.tiAk &hJ City, State, Zip J-(2,41...Libui_a_ a_ t2 � Print Name , 514. - Street Address `{ Signature . '`� - City, State, Zip TE-144-&-b-11-1/ ,0 b} ges-9 g � Print Namee,no...1-arrl e\Ka-, Street Address Signature \ j 4 ,4 ,_1//; ajf City, State, Zip ~Ve,-tO-e...42A-dilir "12.ct1� Print Name ti % ovor Street Address Signature �` City, State, Zip • , I�r o'er e. Print Name * 'J� (' /L_I Street Address Signature City, State, Zip I?'" U /72 Print Name LIw/N C14T2/5 Street Address Print flame X40;it �� Street Address , Signature �. Ga`-' -4City, State, Zip T- 2 l'1-5/)- Print !]amp L-4UaN9 4, /Q/loD4S,7", Street Address - Signature ' q7 Xle94-,h City, State, Zip 7-5C-74cuL,y/ 4. 9259? Print !lame 4-C& I/- i(.y Street Address Signature d "-'s6i / City, State, Zip 7 9-26r I p Print !lame CC�'QUr?�/,Z-50N6414tree! Address �^ J Signature 7/_ , iiK,SA*Zity, State, Zip /- �/J ��. ��:5 / , ' Print ltame_ML_Z)eA ` \ a/ treet Address III Si natur- . �___ __ � State, Zip ���--p cam./�. w �Print Name14 1,�0 ��►�. > Street Address Signature '/41704,4‘4' illb .itY, State, Zi .,- Q �� L--1:v90-593 Pte � Print !]a .3/ fi Street Address AL ift. S igna tu - p , i-7iiiiiity, State, Zip /6 .z�cJ_i , i ' ,62.7- Print !lame Street Adciresr.-;