HomeMy WebLinkAbout052395 CC AgendaIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in
this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (909) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior
to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that
meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II]
AGENDA
TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
A REGULAR MEETING
COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER
30875RANCHO VISTA ROAD
MAY 23, 1995- 7:00 PM
5:30 PM - Closed Session of the City Council pursuant to Government Code Section
54956.9{A) Claim of Chades and Sharon Miller end § 54956.9, Pending Litigation, Hill vs. City
of Temecula.
Ordinance: No. 95-0~
Resolution: No. 95-43
CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Jeffrey Stone presiding
I nvocati on:
Reverend George Simmons, House of Praise
Flag Salute:
Councilmember Robarts
ROLL CALL:
Lindemans, Mu~oz, Parks, Robarts, Stone
PRESENTATIONS/
PROCLAMATIONS
Certificates of Appreciation - The Women's Club of Temecula,
Paradise Chevrolet and the Law Offices of Lorenz, Alhadeff,
Cannon and Rose
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 30 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Council on
items that are not listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited
to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council on an item not listed on the
Agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak' form should be filled out
and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk
before the Council gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual
speakers.
R:~Agerde%062316 I
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made at
this time. A total, not to exceed, ten (10) minutes will be devoted to these reports.
CONSENT CALENDAR
3
4
5
Standard Ordinance Adootion Procedure
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in
the agenda.
Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve the minutes of May 9, 1995.
Resolution Aoorovina List of Demands
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 95-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING
CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
Public Nuisance Abatement- 30301 Nicolas Road
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Set the date of a I~ublic hearing for June 13, 1995, at 7:00 PM, for the purpose of
confirming the cost to the City for the abatement of a public nuisance at 30301
Nicolas Road.
Solicitation of Construction Bids for Access Ramos Project - PW 95-04
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1 Approve the plans land specifications and authorize the Department of Public Works
to solicit public construction bids for Access Ramps - Project PW95-04.
R:~Agenda~D62386 2
6
7
8
9
Contract Chancie Order No. 4 for Winchester Road Interim Street Imorovements, Project
PW94-03
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1
Approve Contract Change Order No. 4 for Winchester Road Interim Street
Improvements, Project PW94-03 for Additional Aggregate Base - Class 2 in the
amount of ~27,660.00.
6.2
Approve a budget transfer in the amount of $24,537.64from the Pavement
Management Project to the Winchester Road Interim Street Improvements Project.
Solicitation of Construction Bids for Sidewalk Imorovements on Rancho Vista Road and
Mira Loma Drive - Project PW94-19
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1
Approve the construction plans and specifications and authorize the Department of
Public Works to solicit public construction bids for sidewalk improvements on
Rancho Vista Road and Mira Loma Drive - Project PW94-19.
Suoolemental No. 007 to Local Aqencv Agreement for Federal Aid Projects No. 08-5459
for Federal Grant Funding for Pala Road Bridge
RECOMMENDATION:
8.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 95-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING
PROGRAM SUPPLEMENTAL NO. 007, TO LOCAL AGENCY AGREEMENT NO. 08°
5459, BETWEEN THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE CITY
OF TEMECULA FOR FEDERAL AID PROJECT NO. BRLS-5459{003),PALA ROAD
BRIDGE
Amended Memorandum of Understanding - Access to Winchester Road and State Route 79
South
RECOMMENDATION:
9.1
Approve the amended Memorandum of Understanding with Caltrans and authorize
the Mayor to sign.
R:'Ut~,e~daV)62396 3
10
11
12
13
14
Tree Trimmino Prooram in Starlight Ridoe Area
RECOMMENDATION:
10. 1 Authorize staff to call for bids for Tree Trimming Program in the Starlight Ridge
Area.
Release Traffic Sienal MitiQation Bond in Tract No. 26861-3
RECOMMENDATION:
11.1 Authorize the release of Traffic Signal Mitigation Bond in Tract No. 26861-3 and
Direct the City Clerk to so notify the Developer and Surety.
Stoo Controls on Milky Way Drive at Asteroid Way
RECOMMENDATION:
12.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 95-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ESTABLISHING STOP SIGNS
Easement from Tomond Prooerties Limited for Maintenance of Looo Detectors at Del Rio
Road and Front Street
RECOMMENDATION:
13.1 Accept the easement from Tomond Properties Limited for the maintenance of loop
detectors at Del Rio Road and Front Street.
Resolution Reouestinc) Inland Emoire Postmark Desiqnation
RECOMMENDATION:
14.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 95-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA REQUESTING
INLAND EMPIRE POSTMARK DESIGNATION
R:'V~gerdaV)62396 4
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before · public
hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of
the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court,
you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the
public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior
to, the public hearing.
15 Planning Aoolication No. PA 94-0098, Nicolas Vallev Special Study
RECOMMENDATION:
15.1
Receive report and direct staff to prepare a General Plan Amendment to delete
Section IV(d), Special Study Overlay, from the Land Use Element of the General
Plan.
COUNCIL BUSINESS
16 Sorav Iniection Machine
(Requested by Mayor Stone)
RECOMMENDATION:
16.1 Review and discuss the report on Spray Injection Machines, and provide direction to
staff.
17 Temecula Emolovee Aoorenticeshio Model (T.E.A.M.) Proaram
RECOMMENDATION:
17.1 Receive this report and provide staff direction.
18
ADoroval of Joint Traffic Safety Proaram (Ooeration SCAIR)
RECOMMENDATION:
18.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 95-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING
AN AGREEMENT TO PARTICIPATE IN A JOINT TRAFFIC SAFETY PROJECT WITH
THE CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL, THE RIVERSIDE SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
AND OTHER SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES
R:'%Agerda~062356 6
19
20
Discussion of Possible Board of Supervisors Action to Cease Fundina for Western Riverside
Council of Governments
(Discussion Item Only - Placed on the agenda at the request of Councilmember Roberts)
Consideration of Street Namino Proqram
RECOMMENDATION:
20.1 Approve in concept, a policy to allow the American Cancer Society the opportunity
to auction a street name as a fund raising project.
20.2 Direct staff to formalize the necessary policy and procedures to implement this
program.
DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: June 13, 1995, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho
Vista Road, Temecula, California.
R:~Aeendm%O623H e
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SER~CES DISTRICT MEETING - ~o be held st 8:00)
...........
CALL TO ORDER: President Ronald H. Roberts
ROLL CALL: DIRECTORS: Lindemans, Mur~oz, Parks, Stone, Roberts
PUBLIC COMMENT:
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Board of
Directors on items that are not listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers
are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to .the Board of Directors on an
item not listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak"
form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk
before the Board of Directors gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for
individual speakers.
Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors, should present a completed pink "Request to
Speak" to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your
name and address for the record.
CONSENT CALENDAR
I Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of May 9, 1995.
2 Acceptance of Landscape Maintenance Areas and Residential Street LightinQ
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Accept the deeds for the TCSD landscape maintenance areas and direct the City
Clerk to record the documents;
2.2 Accept Tract No. 22762 into the Rancho Highlands landscape maintenance rate
level.
2.3 Accept the residential street lights.
R:V~genda%062316 7
3 Award Professional Services Contract for Materials TestinQ DurinQ the Construction of
Rancho California SPorts Park Improvement Project No. PW94-O7CSD
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Award a Professional Services Contract to Geotechnical and Environmental
Engineers, Inc. (GEE) to provide material testing services during the construction of
Rancho California Sports Park Improvement Project No. PW94-O7CSD, in an amount
not to exceed $18,634.
3.2 Appropriate $18,634 for the services contract and $1,864 for 10% contingency for
a total of $20,498 from Development Impact Fees to the Capital Project Fund.
DISTRICT BUSINESS
4 Consideration of Fee Reduction for Filming at the Community Recreation Center
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Consider a fee reduction for filming at the Community Recreation Center for
Weekend in the Country, Inc.
DEPARTMENTAL REPORT
GENERAL MANAGERS REPORT - Bradley
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT - Nelson
BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT: Next meeting: June 13, 1995, 8:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875
Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California.
R:'~4enda%062386 8
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING
CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Ronald J. Parks presiding
ROLL CALL:
AGENCY MEMBERS: Lindemans, Mufioz, Roberrs, Stone, Parks
PUBLIC COMMENT:
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Redevelopment
Agency on items that are not listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers
are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Agency on an item nO1;
listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink 'ReqUest to Speak" form should
be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk
bqfore the Agency gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual
speakers.
CONSENT CALENDAR
I Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of May 9, 1995.
AGENCY BUSINESS
2 Temecula Shuttle Project
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1
Approve the execution of a lease of City-owned property at Front and Sixth Streets
(APN #922-023-020)to Ed and Kathleen Dool under terms and conditions described
in Attachment A in a form acceptable to the Executive Director and Agency
Attorney;
2.2
Approve an RDA Rehabilitation Loan of $1 00,000 for the construction of the
Temecula Shuttle project under the terms described in Attachment B;
2.3
Approve the appropriation of $97,423.76 for the purchase of property located at
41953 Main Street, Temecula, California (APN #922-034-0291 )in accordance with
Redevelopment Agency action of December 20, 1994. (Attachment C).
R:%Age~de'qe062396 ·
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
AGENCY MEMBER'$ REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT: Next Meeting: June 13, 1995, 8:00 PM, 30875 Rancho Vista Road,
Temecula, California.
R:~/~end,~062386 10
Ceraficate of Appreciaaon
In appreciation and gratitude from the City Council on behalf of the
citizens of the City of Temecula,
For their generous support of the Old Town Temecula Senior Center by assisting in the
purchase of a handicapped equipped van to better serve the needs of the Senior Citizens of
Temecula.
IN WITNESS WH ~:st~X)F, I have hereunto
affixed my hand and official seal this
23rd day of May, 1995
Jeffrey E. Stone
Mayor
June S. Greek, CMC
City Clerk
ITEM 1
ITEM 2
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
HELD MAY 9, 1995
A regular meeting of the Temecula City Council was called to order at 7:05 PM at the
Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Street, Temecula, California. Mayor
Jeffrey E. Stone presiding.
PRESENT 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Lindemans, Mu~oz, Parks,
Roberrs, Stone
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Also present were City Manager Ronald Bradley, City Attorney Peter M. Thorson, and City
Clerk June S. Greek.
EXECUTIVE SFSSION
A meeting of the City of Temecule City Council was called to order at 5:45 PM. It was moved
by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Roberrs to adjourn to Executive
Session pursuant to Government Code Sections:
1. §54956.8, CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR, Property: Bounded .by
Rancho California Road and Ynez Road, e portion of Assessor's Parcel Number 944-330-006;
Negotiating parties: City of Temecula and Kernper Real Estate Company; Under negotiation:
Proposed sale of real property.
2. §54956.8, CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR, Property: Bounded by
Margarita Road and Rancho California Road, Negotiating Parties: City of Temecula and
Kemper Real Estate Company; Under Negotiation: Purchase of property.
3. § 54956.8,CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR, Property: 43106 Business
Park Drive; Negotiating parties: City of Temecula and Grubb and Ellis; Under negotiation:
price and terms of pa.yment.
The motion carried with Councilmember Muttoz absent. Councilmember Mu~oz joined the
Executive Session at 6:15 PM.
City Attorney Thorson reported that no action was taken in closed session.
INVOCATION
The invocation was given by Bishop Konrad Lee, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day
Saints.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The audience was led in the flag salute by Councilmember Parks.
Minutes%5',09%95 - 1 - 05116/95
City Council Minutes May 9, 1995
PRESENTATIONS/
PROCLAMATIONS
Mayor Stone proclaimed the month of May to be, "Water Awareness Month."
Mayor Stone proclaimed the month of May to be, "Mental Health Month.'"
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None given.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Councilmember Parks reported that the SCAG Regional Council has chosen Temecula to hold
their annual retreat on June I st and 2nd. He requested that the City Council do something
special for the SCAG Regional Council as they will have 40-50 members present.
Mayor Pro Tam Lindemans reported facts from a United States Department of Defense Report,
including population end job statistics for Riverside County.
Councilmember Mu~oz reported on a meeting he attended on behalf of the City Council, April
28th, regarding the Santa Margarita River/Santa Ana Mountains Bio Reserve Strategic Plan.
He reported the focus of the discussion had to do the with the Endangered Species Act and
environmentalism in general.
An unidentified speaker representing the Nature Conservancy, gave a brief overview of the
organization, its goals and accomplishments.
Mayor Stone reported that the City of Tamecula has been pro-active in controlling funds and
bring jobs to the area, stating Temecula's unemployment numbers have dropped below the
average for Riverside County. He also thanked Target, Costco and K-Mart and the citizens of
Temecula for donating funds to assist victims of the Oklahoma tragedy and reported that a
check for ~3,100.00 was sent to the Salvation Army in Oklahoma.
Councilmember Robarts reported a Sister City delegation from Voorburg, Holland will be
visiting Tamecula starting tomorrow.
Mayor Stone also reported that the City has done all that is possible to implement the Traffic
Director Program at the Winchester Intersection and will continue to work with Caltrans to
work out problems which are holding up implementation of this program.
Minutes%5~09~,95 -2- 05116/95
CiW Council Minute
May 9. 1995
CONSENT CALENDAR
Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans announced he would abstain on Item 2.2 since he did not attend
the meeting.
Councilmember Parks requested the removal of Item No. 7 from the Consent Calendar to hear
the public comment requested on that item.
Mayor Stone commented on Item No. 5, stating he spoke with Moreland and Associates and
they have agreed to not increase their fees for the upcoming year.
It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Lindsmarts, seconded by Councilmember Roberts to approve
Consent Calendar Items 1-6 and 8-10, with Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans abstaining on Item 2.2;
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Lindemans, Mufioz, Parks, Roberrs,
Stone
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Standard Ordinance Adoption Procedure
1.1 Motion to waive the reading of
included in the agenda.
Minutes
2.1
2.2
2.3
the text
Approve the minutes of April 11, 1995.
of all ordinances and resolutions
Approve the minutes of April 19, 1995, (Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans abstained.)
Approve the minutes of April 25, 1995.
Resolution Aoorovina Iist of Demands
3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 9541
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
Minutee%SM:)9%95 -3- 05116/95
Mev 9.1995
Ciw Council Minutes ~
e
e
8
9
City Treasurer's Reoort
4.1 Receive and file the City Treasurer's Report as of March 31, 1995.
Contract for Audit Services for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30.1995
5.1 Approve a one-year extension with Moreland and Associates to provide audit
services for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1995.
Extension of Bankina Services
6.1 Approve a two-year extension with First Interstate Bank to provide banking
services through June 30, 1997.
Acceotance of Public Imorovements in Parcel Mao No. 2~6~9
8.1
8.2
8.3
8.4
8.5
Accept the public improvements in Parcel Map No. 22629;
Authorize reduction in Faithful Performance Security amounts for
improvement of streets and drainage;
Authorize the release of the Subdivision Monumentation security amount;
Direct the City Attorney to prepare reconveyance documents;
Direct the City Clerk to so notify the Developer.
the
Suoolement No. 006 to Local AQencv - State AQreement for Federal Aid Project No.
STPLN-5459. I-1511-215 Corridor Study
9.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 9542
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVING SUPPLEMENT NO. 006, TO LOCAL AGENCY AGREEMENT NO.
08-5459, BETWEEN THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND
THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR FEDERAL AID PROJECT NO. STPLN-5459, I-
1511-215 CORRIDOR STUDY
10
Summary on the' Interim Fire Station
10.1 Receive and file the summary for the interim Fire Station located at Linfield
School.
Minutes%S%09%95 -4- 05116/95
Ciw Council Minute May 9, 1995
7. "Please Save Lives - Don't Drink and Drive" Sian Program
Chris Martinelli, 30255 Corte Cantania, representing Temecula Community Partnership,
stated the seven proposed signs are gifts from Temecula Community Partnership and
there is no fiscal impact associated with the program. She requested the Council
approve this item.
Councilmember Parks requested a better map showing proposed locations of signs.
Public Works Director Joe Kicak clarified the location of signs.
It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans, seconded by Councilmember Roberts to
approve staff recommendation as follows:
7.1
Approve the "Please Save Lives - Don't Drink and DriVe" sign program proposed
by the Temecula Community Partnership.
The motion was unanimously carried.
COUNCIL BUSINESS
11 City Attorney Service Anelvsis
Human Resources Administrator Grant Yates presented the staff report.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans to
approve staff recommendation as follows:
11.1 Approve continuation of contract City Attorney services;
11.2 Approve retaining Peter Thorson and Burke, Willjams and Sorenson, as the City
Attorney.
The motion was unanimously carried. ..
City Attorney Thorson thanked the City Council for their support and pledged his
continued efforts to provide the best service possible and to reduce costs whenever
possible.
RECESS
Mayor Stone called a recess at 8:02 PM to change the tape. The meeting was reconvened
following the previously scheduled Community Services District and Redevelopment Agency
Meeting at 8:43 PM.
Minutes%5%09%95 -5- 05116/95
City Council Minutes May 9, 1995
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
None given.
CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT
None given.
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Roberrs to adjourn at
8:43 PM to a meeting on May 23, 1995, 7.:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875
Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. The motion was unanimously carried.
ATTEST:
Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor
June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk
Minutee%~09%95 -6- 05116/95
ITEM 3
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF ~ ALtOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND
DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN i<XH~KIT A
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE,
DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOI-LOWS:
5eetion 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A have been
audited by the City Manager, and thai the same are hereby allowed in the mount of
$530,719.58.
Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution.
APPROVI~ AND ADOPTED, this 23rd day of May, 1995.
ATTEST:
ieffrey E. Stone, Mayor
June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk
[SEAL]
Rssos63 I
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMF_L"ULA)
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby do certify that the
foregoing Re,~lution No. 95- was duly adopted at a reSular meeting of the City Council of the
City of Temecula on the 23rd day of May, 1995 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: 0
NOES: 0
ABS~: 0
COUNTERS: None
COUNCrLI~-MBERS: None
COUNTERS: None
June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk
CITY OF TEMECULA
LIST OF DEMANDS
05/04/95 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
05/11/95 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
05/23/95 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
05/04/95 TOTAL PAYROLL:
TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 0~/I)I/IS COUNCIL MEETING:
DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND:
CHECKS:
001 GENERAL
100 GAS TAX
120 DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FUND
140 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT
165 RDA4.OW/MOD
190 COllAUNITY 8ERVI~E8 D~b'~III~T
101 TCSD SERVICE t. EVB. A
192 TCSD SERVICE L.EVB. B
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ (CIP)
220 MARGARITA ROAD RENB. 0iST.
250 CAPITAL PROJECTS - TCSD
280 RDA-.CIP
300 INStRANCE
310 VEHICLES
320 INFORMATION8 SYSTEMS
330 SUPPORT SERVICES
340 FACILITIES
380 RDA-DEBT SERVICE
390 TCSD DEBT SERVICE
PAYROLL:
001 GENERAL
10o GAS TAX
165 RDA-.t.OWNOD .
190 TCSD
161 TC,,q0 SERVICE LEVEL A
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
193 TC8~ SERVICE LEVEL C
280 RDA-CIP
393 INSUIV~CE
320 INFOFIMATION SYSTEMS
330 SUPPORT SERVICES
340 FACILITIES
TOTAL BY FUND:
$ 146,785.25
74,534.40
133,285.97
121,153.96
$ 330,719.58
N,721.84
38,2e5.26
0.00
0.00
285.27
S2,74e.20
5,248.33
21,630.53
2,72~.24
0.00
105,557.55
0.00
0.00
35,2~0.12
58,226.12
0.00
4,910.20
4,974.3~
0.00
3,641
75,2so.as
13,852.87
468.70
22,885.64
464.00
620.26
1,80e J6
1
221.77
1,5e5.03
718.62
121,158.96
530,710.53
VOUC~RE~
17:51
C l TY OF TENECULA
VOIJCHER/CIIECK REGISTER
Iralit ALL PEItlQI)S
PAGE
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FU!¢
100 GAS TAX FUND
165 RDA DEV- LCX~//N(X) SET ASIDE
190 Cali~ITY SERVICES DISTRICT
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
193 TC:~ SERVICE LEVEL C
210 CAPITAL iHPROVENENT PROJ FIID
280 REDEVELOPI~NTAGENCT - CIP
300 INSURANCE
320 iNFORNATiOII SYSTENS
· 30, SUPPORT SERViCES
340 FACILITIES
TOTAL
mT
67,127.52
13,5~.55
20,573.77
4,152.73
21,600.09
1,865.98
3,742.19
1,056.90
3,888.23
4,052.95
4,512.85
1/,6,765.25
VOUCHRE2
VUUCHER/
CHECK
NLNBER
1704,
A53682
,r,53682
4.53682
4.53682
z,53682
4.53682
4.53682
4.53682
4.53682
4.53682
4.53682
z,53682
4.53682
23431
23431
23/,31
23431
234,31
23431
23431
~31
1431
17:~5
CHECK
DATE
05/0~/95
05/Q~/95
0510~/95
0510~1~5
0510~195
0510~195
05/0~/95
0510~/95
0510~/95
000283
OOO283
OOO283
000283
000283
O00283
000283
000283
000283
000283
0430283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
O00283
000283
0O028:5
VEI)CIt
M
FIRSTAX (Ill)
FIRSTAX (IllS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX CIRS)
FIRSTAX CIRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX CIRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX CIRS)
FIRSTAX CIRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (El)D)
FIRSTAX
FIRSTAX
FIRSTAX CEDD)
FIRSTAX CE!X))
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDO)
FIRSTAX
FIRSTAX (BX)
FIRSTAX {EDO)
FIRSTAX CEDO)
FIRSTAX
FIRSTAX CEDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
ANS'TMS
ANS'TMS
AMS"TMS
AMS-TMS
AMS'TMS
AMS-TMS
AMS-TMS
AMS'TMS
AMS'TMS
AMS'TMS
CITY OF TBIECULA
VIXJCHER/ClIECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEN
DESCRIPT!~
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDEItAL
000283 FEDERAL
000~83 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000?.83 FEDERAL
000?83 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000~3 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
0430283 lETCARE
000283 SICNeE
000283 HEDICAIE
000283 SICARE
000283 SICARE
000283 MEN CARE
0004~ STATE
~ STATE
0004~ STATE
0004~ STATE
0004~ STATE
~ STATE
0004~ STATE
0004~ STATE
0004.~ STATE
0004~ STATE
OOL~ STATE
00e':~./: STATE
DEPOSZT FOR RESETTING POSTAGE
DEPOSIT FOR RESETTING POSTAm:
DEPOSIT FOR RE~'TTING POSTAGE
DEPOSIT FOR RESETTING POSTAI~
DEPOSIT FOR RESETTING POSTAGE
DEPOSIT FOR IREJETTING POSTAGE
DEPOSIT FOR RE~'TTIIIG POSTAGE
DEPOSIT FaR RESETTING POSTAGE
DEPOSIT FOIt RESETTING POSTAGE
AC~:QUNT
WER
Z80-2070
32o-2o?o
ool -2off)
loo-2o7o
19o-2o7o
192-20T0
193-2070
280-2070
300-2070
001-100-999-5230
001-14.0-999-5230
001-1990
001-110-999-5Z50
001-150-999-5230
001-120-999-5230
001-161-g99-5230
001-162-999-5Z50
100-16&-604.-5230
100-1990
ITEN
NCUMT
12,061.93
2,221.38
40.17
2,74.1.39
4.9.4.0 -
70.68,
213.80
171,0~
23.32
105.9~
119,%
Z,819,6~
4.99.12
14.
786.32
17.78
64..10
51
8.ZO
57.96
4.2.Tf
8.00
:3,272.38
581 ,:31
10.77
561.69
16.16
8.91
4.5,86
56.16
7.4.5
18.96
1.60
14..4.2
156.09
36.09
/,2.12
105.36
/,01 ./5
135.18
55.58
1.17
PAGE 1
CHECK
4.,776.10
YOUCratE2
' ' 9~/9S
VUUCHER/
CHECK
NUI48ER
Z5~1
23A31
23~32
23~32
5435
23~37
23437
23439
Z~39
234~0
2..................~40
ZS~0
Z5~1
Z54~1
Z.~61
Z.~I
ZSz,~I
Z54~1
Z~61
Z5~1
Z5~1
17:~5
CHECK
DATE
00/OrdgS
00/04/95
~1~1~
~1~1~
~1~1~
~/~1~
~1~1~
~1~1~
~1~/95
~!~/95
~1~/95
~1~1~
0010~/95
0010~195
0010~19S
0010~/95
0S10~/95
0010~195
0010~/95
0010~/9S
OO068O
000765
000765
000116
000116
000116
0430116
000116
000116
000116
000116
000116
000116
000116
00O116
O00116
000101
001323
OO1323
OOO95O
O0095O
000131
000131
000131
000131
000160
000160
000160
000160
000160
000160
O0O16O
000160
000160
000~7
M
ANS-TRS
ANS-TNS
AT&T
AT&T
AVPVISINP~S
AVPVISI~P~S
AVPVISZ~P~S
AVPVISZ~P~S
AVPV~SINP~S
AVPVISI~P~S
AVPVISI~P~S
AVPVISINP~S
AVPVISINP~S
AVPVISINPLANS
AVPVISINP~S
AVPVISINP~S
AVPVISINP~S
ADKINS, ROBERT STEVEN
ANERIGAS
APPLE ONE, INC.
ARROUHEAD UATER, INC.
ARRUdHEAD MATER, INC.
BEIJING LONGEVITY, INC.
CALIFORNIAN, INC.- DISP
CALIFORNIAN, INC.' DISP
CARL UARREN & CO., INC.
CARL UARREN & CO., INC.
CARL UARREN & CO., INC.
CARL UARREN & CO., INC.
COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN
COLGIilAL LIFE & ACCIDEN
COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN
COLONIAL LIE & ACCIDEN
COLONIAL LIFE & ACC!DEN
COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN
COLONIAL LIFE & ACClDEN
EIX. QNIAL LIFE & ACEIDEN
COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN
CCHTRONIX OF HENET
CITY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEH
DESCRIPTION
DEPOSIT FOR RESETTING POSTAGE
DEPOSIT FOR RESETTING POSTAGE
LONG DISTANCE SERVICE
LONG DISTANCE S~RVS
000116 AVP
000116 AVP REVE
000116 AVP
000116 AVP
000116 AVP
000116 AW
000116 AW
000116 AW
000116 AVP
000116 AVP
000116 AVP
000116 AVP
000116 AVP DED
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
VEHICLE PEOPI CONVERSION B&S
TB4P HELP b//E 6/15-6/22 NEER
BOTTLED UATER/CITY HALL
BOTTLE MATER FOR NAIlIT IREMS
TCSD INSTRUCTON EARNINGS
JON RECRUITKENT ADS
ADS FOR TCSD SEASONAL POSITION
DESHITH ARDITH, 0212/,194,
CUCCIA,THERESA & SHAME 9/2219'5
HUBLICK mOLD, 06102/9~
DUARE,SALVADON CAI4POS 01/18/9~
2 BATTERY FOR HAND HELD RADIOS
ACCGUNT
mER
190-180-999-5230
320-199-999-5230
320-199-999-5208
320-199-999-5208
001 -Z510
001 -Z510
001 -Z510
100-Z510
165-Z510
190-ZSTO
191 -Z510
19'5-2310
280-Z510
300-2310
360-Z510
001-1180
001-2310
190-18;5-999-5'530
001-162-999-5216
280-199-999-5250
)&O-199-999-S2&O
100-16~-601-5260
190-18~-999-5:~0
001-150-999-525A
190-180-999-525&
300-199-999-5205
300-199-999-5205
300-199-999-5205
300-199-999-5200
001-2330
190-2330
001-2330
100-2330
165-Z530
190-2330
191 -Z530
193-Z5~0
280-~330
100-16~-601-5218
ITEN
152.2~,
1.88
5.OO
.32 -
1.52
1.52-
~87.59
81.63
6.18
52.9O
4.39
5.36
16.19
16.70
9.75
1.52
~S .00
150.86
19.09
3A3.13
122.13
116.00
317.75
39.75
39./S
14~ .71
12.9~
6.67
83.6~
16.35
17.53
6.67
161.63
CHECK
ANOUlrr
1,143.4,8
5.32
580.65
28.8O
1:57.10
899.01
161.63
VOUCHRE2
~-*~,/95
vuuCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
23~3
~t,:~.~
23~5
23~6
Z5~7
23,r~9
/"*~50
50
23~5'1
2..~52
23~53
23,r~53
23~54
23~55
23~56
2~56
23~57
23~57
23~57
23~57
23~57
23~57
23~57
¼58
/*--~58
17:45
CNEI3:
DATE
0511~195
0510~195
0510~195
0510z,/95
0~1041~
0510~1~5
0510~/~5
05/0~/f5
0510~/~5
0510~/~5
~II)OR
NLIIER
~1535
OO0155
OOQI~
(X)01~
QQ0156
OO0156
OO0156
~16~
~1669
~1669
001669
~1~1
0~1~
~11~
00116
0004,81
000,(,81
M
CODDOVA, IRENE
CREEI~IDE TE)(ACO, INC.
DAVLIN
CITY OF TNIX, ILA
VOUCIk"RICNECK REGISTER
Flit ALL PERIODS
ITEH
DESCRIPTIOD
REFIJND FOR TCSD CLASS
Pt,! POOL TRUCK REPAIRS & illIT
AUDIO TAPING OF &/25 aIMCIL M
DEIrrlCM. E OF CALIFORNIA 000156
DENTICJUtE OF CALIFORtlIA OO01S6
DENTIC. ARE OF CALIFORNIA 000156
DENTICJUtE OF CALIFOIIIA 000156
DENTlONE OF CALIFORNIA 000156
DIVERSIFIED TEMPORARY S
DUNN ED4dNU)S CDEPOItATIO
DUNN ENMUIDS ODRPOIATIO
DUNN EDMNU)S CORPOIUtTIO
DUNN ENMIIDS CODPORATIO
EFFECTIVE Fffi3NOTIOIIS, l
EFFECTIVE PROle"TIONS, I
ENTERPRISE RENT-A-CAR
ENTERPRISE RENT-A-CAR
EXaL RENTAL CENTER
FEDERAL EXPIESE, INC.
FREEDOI4NATERIALS
FREEDON NATERIALS
G T E CALIFODNIA" PAY!4
G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM
G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYI4
GNIZ, VICICl
GEOTECHNICAL & ENVIRONM
GEOTECNNICAL & ENVIROIN
GLENHIES OFFICE PRCOUCT
GLENHIES OFFICE PR(X)UCT
GLENNIESOFFICE PNXX/CT
GLENHIES OFFICE PNX)UCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRC])UCT
GLENHIES OFFICE PRGXJCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PR(X)t/CT
GROUP ANERICA - VOLUNTA
61ffilJP HRICA - VOLIJNTA
DENT-REV
DENTICAR
DEN-N41N
DENT -ADV
DENTIC, JUt
TB4P RELP WE &r~ ClMINGA
IN NAIliT StJPPLIES (GOOF OFF)
TAX
RECTCLED ENAFFITi PAINT
TAX
POOr. SAFETY COt~tlNG BOOK
FREIGHT
DEPOSIT:COIIF;SIERRA:R.tISTON
DEPOSIT:CONF;SIERRA:R.IESTOD
SKIPLON)EN RENTAL FOR IN
EXPRESS 14ALL SERVICES
PURCHASE OF HATERIAL$ FOR TC$O
PURCHASE OF NATENIALS FOR TC$O
909 699-0128 SEN USAGE
909 6~9-2/,75 CITY YAItD
909 699-6267 FILl4 a3UNCIL
REFUII) FOR TIeD CLASS
NUU. YSIS RELATIVE TO X-NOISTUR
PLAN CK COST FOR HEALTH RE
NISC OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES
NISC OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES
NISCOFFICE StJPPLIES
NISC OFFICE SUPPLIES
NISC OFFICE SUPPLIES
000430 VL REVER
000430 VOL LIFE
MER
190-183-&980
100-16~.-604)-521/,.
001-100-999-5250
001-1180
001-2~0
001-23&0
OO1-1180
001
001-16;I-999-5118
100-16~-601-5218
100-16&-601-5218
100-16&-601-5218
100-16&-601-SZ18
190-183-999-5310
190-183-f99-5310
001-14,0-999-57.61
001-1990
1OD-164-601-5Z58
280-199-999-5230
lg0-180-999-5212
190-180-999-5212
320-199-999-5208
1OD-16/,-601-5208
320-199-999-5208
190-183 4992
001-1fi-999-5~/0
001-111-999-54,/0
OO1-1Z0-999-5220
001-1&0-999-5220
001-1&0-999-5220
OD1-l&O-999-5220
190-180-999-5220
190-180-999-52Z0
001-14,0-999-5220
001-2510
001-2510
ITEN
62.00
18o:71
7.8~.
15.00
7.8~
7.8A
325.08
367.5O
15.00
64.86
185.1&
z'r/.2o
9.50
&9.57
81.89
1,053.47
39.~
~.~
211.50
59.OO
190.80-
138.91
PAGf 3
CHECE
mOUNT
180.7'1
796.~5
125
382.50
250.OO
27/.20
9.50
131 .~6
1,119.52
6.OO
V~UCHRE2
%/95
VUUCHBU
CHECK
2~58
23~58
Z5658
Z~58
23~58
23658
23458
23~58
27~58
2~58
23659
17:45
CHECK
DATE
05/0/,/95
05/0/,./95
05104/95
05/(X.,,95
05/06/95
05/iX/95
05104195
05104195
05104195
05/04/95
05104195
05104195
05104195
05104195
05104195
05104195
05104195
05104195
05104195
05104195
05104195
05104195
05104195
05104195
05104195
05104195
05104195
05104195
05104/95
05104195
05104195
05104/95
05104/95
05104195
05104/95
05104/95
05104/95
05104/95
05104/95
05104/95
VEW
mR
0O043O
OOO430
000~30
O0(Y,30
00G430
000~30
OO0430
OO0430
OOO43O
001697
001536
001536
001536
001536
001536
001536
001536
001536
001536
001536
001536
001536
001536
001536
001536
001536
001536
001536
001536
0015:36
0015:36
001536
001536
0015:56
OO1O60
VENIml
IL4J4E
~ ANERZCA - VOLLITA
IU)UP NIRZCA - VOUJIITA
GROUP NIEItZCR - VOUJNTA
GRiXJP AMERICA - VOLUNTA
GROUP NIERICA - VOLUNTA
GROUP AMERICA - VOLUNTA
GROUP HRICA - VOLUNTA
GROUP HRICA - VQLUIITA
GRaJP HRICA - VOLUNTA
GRC)tJP MERICA - VQLUNTA
NAITFQID LIFE iIIJRANCE
HARTFIlE) LIFE filllANCE
HARTFQIE) LIFE IlllANCE
HARTFORD LIFE II~URNIC~
NARTFQRD LIFE III~IIAIICE
NARTFQRI) LIFE INSURANCE
HARTFOIl) LIFE llCE
HARTFORD LIFE INSIMANCE
NARTFOR!) LIFE INStlAMCE
MARTFOIl) LIFE INSURANCE
HARTFOlD LIFE INSURANCE
HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE
HARTFeD LIFE !ICE
HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE
HARTFORD LIFE INSUP. AliCE
HARTFGR!) LIFE INSURANCE
HARTFOm) LIFE INStJRANCE
HARTF(XtD LIFE INStmANCE
HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE
HARTFQIm LIFE INSURANCE
HARTFORD LIFE INStJP. ANCE
HARTFOlD LIFE INS~CE
HARTFORD LIFE IMStJRANCE
IIARTFQR!) LIFE IN~tleANCE
NARTFGRD LIFE liCE
NNtTFGRD LIFE INIteJUlCE
NAItTFOII) LIFE IN~UIANI:E
&eTFGRI) LIFE !!I~CE
HARTRID LIFE !ICE
HARTFOIl) LIFE INSURANE
HARTFOlD LIFE ll~
HARTHID LIFE IIISlJRAIICE
lUeTFGRD LIFE
HARTFORD LIFE INStJe~CE
HARTFQm) LIFE
HARTFORD LIFE INSLItANCE
HYATT
CITY OF TENEIXILA
VOUClIER/CNECK EEGIITER
FOR ALL PERICI)S
11t1¢
DESCRIPTIQN
000430 VIX, LIFE
OCNII3Q VQL LIFE
INNII3Q VQL LIFE
0¢N)430 VOL LIFE
0¢NI430 VL RDVAN
0004,30 VOL LIFE
QQOA30 VIX, LIFE
000630 VOL LIFE
000,30 VOL LIFE
IX)(X30 VQL LIFE
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
0015~ LIFE INS
0015136 LIFE INS
0015~6 LIFE INS
001536 LIFE INS
001536 LIFE INS
0015~6 LIFE INS
001536 LIFE INS
001536 LIFE INS
001536 LIFE INS
001536 LIFE INS
Q015)6 LIFE INS
001536 LIFE INS
0015~6 Lll)
0015~6 LTD
001536 Lll)
001536 LTD
001536 Lll)
001536 Lll)
001536 LTD
001536 LTD
001536 ' LTD
001536 LTD
001536 Lll)
001536 LI~
001536 STD
CONF:GTC HOTEL RCXX4:T.NAFELI
NLNBER
100-;510
190-2510
19~-;510
34~)-~510
001-2510
001-;510
100-;510
190-2510
lr~-2510
':~,0-2510
O01 -Z~O
1~-2360
190-2360
t91-2~0
192-2360
193-Z~0
260-23~0
300-2360
320-2360
3~0-23~0
001-2380
I00o2380
1~5-2380
190-2380
191 -Z380
192-2380
193-2380
320-2)80
320-199-999-5258
ITEN
15.79
29.69
6.00
./,1
190.80 ·
138.91 -
15.1'9
29.69
6.00
.41
108.00
580.50
110.00
2.50
1.~.50
6.50
10.~
15.50
8.50
2.50
10.00
10.00
21.50
623.07
116.30
14,0.31
5.17
16.10
12.61
1.83
13.89
5.17
16.87
1,~8.88
253.17
8.63
9.87
11.26
35.08
30.Z8
11.26
4~.00
PAGE
CHED:
ANQUNT
~81.60
108.00
3,9&5.50
V~JCHRE2
VuuCHER/
CHECK
MUMBER
~9
~9
25470
25~71
~71
25~71
~71
25~72
2,~73
25~
ZT~7~
Z3~75
25~76
Z~77
Z.~r~78
17:~5
CHECK
DATE
05/0~/95
05/06/95
0510~/95
0510~195
0510~195
0~!0~195
051o~195
0510~195
0510~195
0510~195
0~10~195
VENDOR
NtmER
000196
00019&
000194,
000196
00019~
0001~
000194,
00019/,
001708
001708
001708
001652
000206
000209
001522
001905
000727
001676
VENOOR
M
I CNAREYIREMENTTRUS
I C'N A RETIREMENT TITUS
I CMARETIREMENT TRUS
I C M A RETIREMENT TITUS
I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS
I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS
I C N A RETIREMENT TRUS
I C M A RETIRE~NT TITUS
IDENTICATOR CORPORATIOR
IDENTICATOR CORPOIL4TIOR
IDBfTICATOR CORPORATION
II4PALA, PETER
JERRY KELLETT PAINTING
KINKO'S OF RIVERSIDE, I
IOiORR POOL STSTENS, INC
L & N FERTILIZER, INC.
L & M FERTILIZER, INC.
L & N FERTILIZER, INC.
LAKE ELSIliOIE, CITY OF
LO-FAT CYCLES
LO-FAT CYCLES
LO-FAT CYCLES
LO-FAT CYCLES
NEYERS, DAVID WILLIAM
NONTEREY STSTENS, INC.
IIX(TEREY STSTBIS, INC.
NATIONAL FIE PROTECTIO
NATIONAL FIRE IqIOTECYIO
NATIONAL FIE PROTECY!O
NEXTEL CG!4UIIICATIQNS,
NIEDERECGR, ELISA
OGILVIE, SHERRY
(XX)Z59 OLSTEN STAFFING SEllVICE
001151 PACIFIC EQUIPMENT & IRR
CITY OF TEMECULA
VIXJCHERICHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
WT
NDI4BER
000196 DEF C(XIP OD1-208)
000194. DEF CCIIP 100-2080
000194. DEF CONP 190-2080
00019/, DEF ODNP 191-208)
OD0196 DEF CQIP 192-2080
00019/, DEF CCle 193-2060
00019& DEF CDI4P 280-2080
00019~ DEF CCI4P
IDENTA-PRIIIT REPI.N3!NENT KIT 001-170-999-5220
FREIGHT 001-171)-,999-5220
TAX 001-170~.999-5220
REFIMD FOR TClD CLASS
PAU314A PARK - SEAL CIXICRETE
MISC COPY SUPPLIES
NISC POOL SLIPPLIES FOR CRC
NISC NAINT SUPPLIES
2 - TRIle4ERS M/SHIELD & STRING
TAX
NAYOR\COUNCIL CONF:STGNE-EENHO
INSTALL LITESONPQLICE BIKE
INSTALL LITES all POLICE BIKE
LITES & REAR TIRE POLICE lIKE
LITES & LEVERS all POLICE BIKE
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
MICROFIt. H, & APERTURE CARD
TAX
PUBLICATIall:NFPA13-1976; 95 PP
MEIIER DISCOUNT
FREIGHT
DISPATCH RADIOS IIilLE SERVS
RERJND FOR TCSD CLASS
REFLII) Fall TClD CLASS
TEMP RELP U/E 4/9 GRAGE
OIL FILTERS FOR CITY VEHICLES
1gO-183-&982
190-182-999-5212
OD1-162-999-5222
190-182-999-5212
100-16~-601-5218
100-16~-601-5262
100-16~-601-5262
001-100-999-5258
001-170-999-5215
001-170-999-5215
001-170-999-5215
001-170-999-5215
190-183-999-S3X0
330-199-999-5ZTT
330-199-999-5Z7'7
O01 - 171-999-5228
001-171-999-5228
001-171-999-5228
320-199-999-5209
190-183-&ge2
190-183-6982
OD1-162-999-5118
190-180-999-521/,
ITBI
1 ,~1 .&O
222.01
572.27
65.51
75.00
80.06.
63.34
22.50
530.00
6.88
25.58
~8.00
650.00
21.91
281.86
69.69
885.~
68.65
56.OD
37.71
37,71
61.36
61.97
67.5'0
4.75-
6.50
9~6.00
65.OO
65.OD
613.10
16.12
PACt 5
aT
2,612.09
362.~6
4~.OD
650 .OD
27.91
281.8~
178.75
38&.OD
610.28
69.25
65.00
65.00
613.10
1&.12
VOUCHRE2
"'0~/~5
vuuCHER/
CHECK
NI.IIER
23/~81
17:~5
CHECK
DATE
~/~/95
~/~/~
~/~/~
~/~/95
~/~/~
~/~/~
~/~/95
~/~/~
~1~/~
~/~/95
001~/95
00/0&/95
0510&/95
00/0&/95
0010~195
0010~/95
00/04./gS
00/0~/95
00/0&/95
05104,195
0510~/95
0010~/95
0510~/95
0010~/95
0010~/95
0010~/95
0510~.195
0010~195
0010&195
00/0~/95
00/O4./95
~/~/95
00/0~/95
00/04/95
00/0~/95
00/0&/95
0010~/95
00/0~/95
05/04./95
00/0&/95
00/0~/95
MR
001561
001561
001561
001561
001561
001561
001561
001561
001561
0012/,3
00024.6
0002&6
0002/6
0002&6
00024,6
0002&6
0002&6
0002&6
0002.~
0002&6
00024~
00024,6
00024,6
00024~
0002/.6
0002&6
0002&6
000246
00024,6
0002/.6
0002&6
0002/6
0002&6
0002&6
0002&6
000245
0002/,5
000~
0002&5
0002&5
0002&5
0002~5
0002&5
000265
000245
VENtmR
M
PAGENET - PAGING NETMOB
PAGENET - PAGING HETtdOR
PAGENET - PAGING NGTVOR
PAGENET - PAGING NGllGt
PAGENET - PAGING HETI, IOR
PAGENET - PAGING HET!dOR
PAGENET - PAGING HETI40~
PAGENET - PAGING NETIdOR
PAGENET - PAGING NETM3e
PALMQUEST, NARY
PERS (EHPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (ENPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (B4PLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (ERPLOYEES' RETIIE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS CENPLOYEES' HETIRE
PERS (BIPLOYEES' RETIRE
PEltS (BIPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EIFLOYEES' RETIRE
PEltS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' NETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES~ lIETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EIFLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EIIPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (BFLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (ENPLOYEES' NETIRE
PERS (BIPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EIFLOYEES' HETINE
CITY OF TEMECULA
VCtlCHERICHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIORS
ITB4
DESORIPTIOR
PAGING NONTiff gRVE FOR NAY 95
PAGING NONTiff HEItVS FOR NAY 95
PAGING NONTiff RM FOR NAY 95
PAGING NONTiff SENVS FOR NAY 95
PAGING NONTiff GERV$ FOR NAY 95
PAGING NONTiff NEM FOR NAY 95
PAGING NONTiff SERVS FOR NAY 95
PAGING NONTiff HERVS FOR NAY 95
PAGING MONTHY SERVS FOR NAY 95
TCS~ INSTRIJCTOR EAItNIN~S
IX)02~ PER RIDE
000246 PaREOE
000Z46 FElt RIDE
000Z46 PEltS NET
0002~6 PEltS HET
00024.6 PERS RET
0002,16 PERS HET
0002/,6 PERS RE1'
0002/,6 PEltS RET
0002/,6 PER$ RET
00G2~ PERS RET
0002/,6 PERS HET
004~&6 PERS NET
(X)02~ PERS RET
00024~ PERS NET
0002~ SUNVIVOR
0002/;6 SUGVIVOR
0002/;6 StJRVIVOR
0002&6 SURVIVOR
0002~6 SIJRVIVOR
0002&6 SURVIVOR
0002/;6 SURVIVOR
0002~ SURVIVOR
0002&6 SIMVZVOR
OOQ2&6 SURVIVOR
04X)2~ SURVIVOR
OQ02&6 SIJRVIVOR
PERS (HF~J.TH IND. PIE
PERS (HEALTH IN4MM. PRE
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE IXX)2&S
PEltS (HEALTH INSUR. PIE 00024.5
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PIE 0002&5
PERS (HEALTH INIIJR. PRE 0002/,5
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PeE 0002&5
PERS (HEALTH INSUlt. P~E 0002&5
PERS (HEALTH INSUlt. PRE 0002&5
PERS (HEALTH IND. MtE 0002&5
PERS (HEALTH IND. PIE 0002/)5
NEFIJND FOR SAMDEE LITTRILL
REFtlD FOR SJUI)EE LITTNELL
AETNA SO
BLSHIELD
HELTHIIET
HELTIINET
HELTHEET
NELTNNET
HELTNIIET
rJ~!IERSO
ACC~T
NUHBER
001-100-999-5250
001 - 16~-999-5250
100-16&-601-5ZS8
001-165-999-5238
001-120-999-5250
001-162-999-5Z38
001-170-999-524,2
190-180-999-5250
'320-199-999-5258
190'18~'.999'5:50
001-2130
190-2130
280-2130
001 -Z590
100-2500
16~-2390
190-2390
191-2390
192-2590
193-2390
320-2590
O01-2390
100-2390
165-2590
191-2590
001-161-999-5113
901-1170
O01-2090
O01-2090
001-2090
100-2090
190-2090
280-2090
001-2090
190-2090
ITEN
ANOUNT
22.50
15,00
15.00
7.50
7.50 -
22.50.
30.00
75.00
19.95
)15.20
53.Q?
3.4.7
1.56
12,19"/'.67
2,310.21
76.,16
2,796.4.3
89.91
99.70
319./,5
239.71
37.4.2
208.21
301.05
10.22
13.4~
.4.2
.93
1.,~
.70
.Z3
.93
.93
2.00
226.30-
12.88
18.70
20.4.5
273.92
13.4.6
55.18
11.72
8.10
5.92
17.87'
PAGE6
CHECK
ANQLIT
214.
315.20
18,974..16
VOUCHRE2
vwCHER/
CHECK
NUIIGER
17:65
CHECK
DATE
05/0~/95
05/0~/95
oSlo~/~S
o5/o~/~
IJIIBER
000265
000245
000265
000~5
000245
000~5
000245
000~5
000265
000265
000265
000265
000265
000265
000265
000265
000265
000265
000~5
000265
000~5
OO0265
000265
000265
000265
000265
000265
000~5
000~5
000~5
000265
000265
000245
000~5
000265
000265
000265
0O0265
000265
000~5
0002~
000269
CITY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PEaIOnS
NAME
DESCRIPTION
PEnS (HEALTH INSUR. Pile 000265
PERS (HEALTH INSLIe. Pile ~265
Pets (HEALTH INSUR. PIE 0002/,5
PEnS (HEALTH IMSUR. PIlE 000265
PERS (HEALTH IND. PIE 000265
PERS (HEALTH IND. PRE 000265
PERS (HEALTH INSUn. lie O002&S
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. Pile 000265
PER$ (HEALTH INSII. PRE 000265
PEnS (HEALTH INStit. PEE
PEnS (EALTH INSUlt. I~E 0002/,5
PEnS (HEALTH IND. PEE
PEnS (HEALTH INSUlt. PIE 000265
PEES (IF. ALTH INSUlt. Pile 000265
PEnS (HEALTH INSLIB. IRE 000265
PEnS (HEALTH IND. PRE 000265
lIES (HEALTH IND. PIE
PEnS (HEALTH IllSLit. I~E 0(02/,5
tIns (HEALTH IND. Pile 000265
fiRS (HEALTH INSUR. PEE 000265
PEnS (HEALTH INSUR. Pile
PEnS (HEALTH IND. Pile 000265
PEnS (HEALTH INgJR. PRE
PEnS (IEALTH INSLI. PIlE 0002/,5
PEnS (HEALTH INStl. PEE 000265
PEnS (HEALTH INSUlt. PIE 000265
PERS (HEALTH INSUn. PEE 000265
fIRS (HEALTH ]NSUR. IRE
PENS (HEALTH :nsuIt. Pile 000265
PEnS (HEALTH INSIJR. PRE 0002/,5
PERS (HEALTH IND. IRE 000265
PERS (HEALTH IND. PRE 000265
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. Pile 0002/,5
fIRS (HEALTH' IND. PRE 000265
PEnS (HEALTH IND. PEE
lIES (HEALTH INSII. PRE
lIRS (HEALTH IND. PnE 000265
PEnS (HEALTH INSUlt. PnE 000265
PEnS (HEALTH ]NSUn. PIE 000265
lInS (HEALTH INSUlt. Fg.E 000265
PERS (HEALTH lNIJn. PEE 0002/,5
PEltS (HEALTH INSUlt. PEE 000265
PERS (HEALTH INSLI. PEE 000265
PACIFICn
PACIFIOR
PC
PEltS CHO
PEltS REV
TICARE
TICARE
TN~CAItE
TICARE
AETNASO
AETEA SO
ILSHIELD
CIGNA
CI611A
CIGIM
CIGNA
HELTHIET
HELTHNET
HELTHIET
HELTHNET
HELTHNET
HELTHNET
HELTHIET
HELTHNET
KAISERSO
KAZSEnSO
PACIFICIt
PAC|FICR
PACIFZCR
PACIFICIt
PEnS ClIO
lIES CHO
lInS Clio
PERS DED
PERS
TAKECARE
TAKECARE
TAKECARE
TAG CARE
PETCO ANINAL SUPPLIES, DOG F(X)O FOR TENECULA K-9
PETROLANE
PETROLANE
PETROLANE
PrOPAlE FOR CiTY VEHTCLES'3622
FUEL FOR CiTY VEHICLES
PROPANE FOR TCSD VEHICLES
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH REIMB.
ACCOUNT
100-2090.
001-2090
001-2090
100-2090
193-20gQ
300-2090
O01-2090
100-2090
190-2090
191-2090
193-2090
001-2090
100-2090
190-2090
3&0-2090
001-2090
100-2090
190-2090
192-2090
001-2090
001-2090
190-2090
001-2090
001-2090
001-2090
100-2090
165-2090
001-170-999-5327'
001 - 162-999-5263
001-162-999-5263
190-180-999-5263
ITEN
3.15
35.2.6
Z3.32
121.2,r,
63.Q5
720.51-.'
3~.10
15.16
9.97'
9.96
721
39.81
397.91
857.37
:38.27
6,156.4~,
1,208.17
1,368.25
175 .~
237.07
159 .&8
606.55
806.76
612.12
513.20
61.36
1,0.32.38
3~4.73
1~0.7~
512.76
1,606,~
11.05
6.97
720.51
101.55
1,4~2.09
832.62
96.01
1~.13
9.61
)69.53
188.11
57.55
PAGE
CHECK
N4OLIT
19,782.80
13&.13
567.~5
VIXICHRE2
0~/95
VuUCHER/
CHECK
NLI4BER
234.97
23500
23502
23502
23502
235O3
55O4
,5505
235~
23505
23506
23508
23508
23508
23509
23509
3510
3511
17:51
CHEC3:
DATE
05/0~/95
05/0~/95
05/0~/95
05106195
05/06/95
05/06/95
05/06/95
05/06/95
0510~195
05/0~/95
0510~/95
0510~/95
0510~/05
0510~195
0510~195
O5/O4/95
05/04/~5
05/0~/95
05/0~/95
O5/O4/95
O5/O4/95
05/0~/95
05/0~/95
05106195
OO15OO
OO1~65
00027'1
OO19~9
000376
OO05'57
OOQ53'I
OO0537
OOQ537
QQQ537
OO0537
00~75
O00:575
000~75
000763
OO1567
OO15~,7
OOlS6?
OOlS~7
OOlS6?
OOl.r~7
OO15~7
0015/,7
OOO515
OO06/,2
VENDOR
M
RE!X4AYliE'TZTLEY, $TACI
REGIONAL TRAINING CENTE
RIVERSIDE CO. DEPT. OF
RIVERSIDE CO. HABITAT
R08ERT BEIN, 144 FROST &
S K S, INC/INLAND OIL
S K S, INC/INLAND OIL
S K S, ]NC/INLAI) OIL
S K S, INC/INLAND OIL
S K S, INC/INLANDOIL
S K S, INC/INLAND OIL
SALVATION AIU4Y
SQIJTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CAJ. IF EDISIXi -
$8,,'THERN C, ALIF EDISON -
SOUTHERN r.,ALIF EDISON -
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON -
SIXITHERN CALIF EDISON -
SCl. rrHERN CALIF EDISON -
SOUTHERN CALIF ~LL=P!!ON
SI/,ITHERN CALIF ~LEPIION
SEUTHERN CAI. IF TELEPHON
TAYLOR, BOB
TEN4STERS LOCAL 911
TENISTERS LOCAL 911
TEN4STERS LOCAL 911
TENISTERS LOCAL 911
TEAMSTERS LDCAL 911
TENTERS LOCAL 911
TENTERS LOCAL 911
TMTERS LOCAL 911
TB~ECULA CYCLES
TEIECULA CYCLES
TEMECULA VALLEY CIIAMBER
TERECULA, CITY OF ' FLE
CITY OF TBIECULA
VIXICHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL ff. RIIX)S
ZTEtl
DESCRIPTION
REFUND FOR TCSI) ~
UKSHp:.A.S_~___RTIVE CI31hHI4PTN-IIO
PORTABLE TOILETS RENTAL 8 YARD
PRK SNACKBARS HEALTH PERNITS
K-RAT IgqlT FOR 14ARCIf 05
FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES
FLEL FOR CITY VEHICLES
FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES
FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES
FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES
FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES
COHI4 CGNTR FOR OK BOll, VICTIm
ELECT SERVS FOR SPT PRK II!PIKN
2-01-202-7330 ELECT SERVS
2-OO-397-5026 ELECT SERVS
2-OO-397-5062 ELECT SERVS
2-00-397-5059 ELECT SERV
2-OO-397-5OO7 ELECT SERVE
66-77'-58~-8087-02 ELECT SERVS
909-202-5153APRIL 95
909 202-6766 BB PVBLAZER
909 202-6760 JH
CARPET CLEANING - CITY HALL
0015&7 UN DUES
OO15~7 UN DUES
00154,7 UE D4JES
OO15~7 UN DtJES
OO1567 UN DUES
0015/,7 UN DUES
OO15~7 UE DUES
OO15~,7 UN DUES
PQLICE CYCLES REPAIRS & NAINT.
POLICE CYCLES REPAIRS & RAINT.
SECURITY DEpOSiT REFUND
RAIIrTAIN FLEX lINEFIT/05/06
NUIIER
190-183-6982
001-171-999-5261
lOO-166-601-5258
lOO-180-999-5;50
OO1-162-999-52&8
lOO-16~-601-5263
OO1-1&3-999-5263
OO1-165-999-52&3
001-110-999-5263
190-180-999-5263
001-162-999-5263
OO1-1990
210-190-137-580~
192-180-999-5319
191-180-~;9-5319
~)-199-999-5260
190-180-999-5260
195-180-999-52&0
3&O-199-999-S2&O
001 - 150-999-5208
100-16&-601-5208
lOO-166-60~5-5208
3~0-199-999-5230
001-2123
lOO-2123
190-2125
191-2123
193-2125
280-2125
300-2123
320-2123
OO1-170-9~;9-5216
OO1-170-999-5216
OOl-IOZO
ITBI
N4OUJlT
65 .OO
lOO.OO
57,39
556,OO
lOO,3~
69,76
131,55
3,1OO.OO
308.20
21,079.69
3,716.15
2,331.80
2,78~.95
532.46
73.46
195.52
182.OO
86.28
678.51
86,96
160.60
8.33
28.67
11.10
18.50
67.67
276.18
lOO.OO
3,165.18
PAGE 9
772.57
3,1OO.OO
30,518.51
/,61,80
6R).OO ,
VOUCHRE2
*~,..~,/~
VuUCHER/
CHECK
NLI4BER
23511
73511
23511
2:$512
'Z3513
23513
23513
2351A
23515
23515
23515
23515
23515
23515
23516
rS516
3516
,7
z. s517
23517
23517
23517
23518
23518
23518
23518
23519
2352O
23521
23521
23521
23521
23521
23522
23522
23523
3524
17:51
CHECK
DATE
05/~/95
0~10~1~
0510~1~5
05/0U'95
05104,195
05104195
05 /0~195
0510~195
0510~195
05104,195
05/0~/V5
0510~1~5
051041f5
0510~195
05106195
0510~195
0510~195
oslo~/95
051l~195
0510~/95
0510~/95
05/0~/95
0510~/95
0510~195
051O6/95
0510~195
OO1O65
001065
OO1O65
O01O65
001065
OO1O65
000~26
OOO326
OOO326
000~26
001209
OO1928
001881
001881
001881
001881
001881
m9
M
TENECULA, CITY OF - FLE
TENECULA, CITY OF - FIE
TENECULA, CITY OF - FLE
T!IIIY D. PRQ)UCT!ONS
TME CENTER STATIONERS
TOIIE CENTER STATIONERS
TOklE CENTER STATIONERS
TRAVEL TRUST
U $ C 14/PEBSCO (DEF. C
U S C I1/KISCO (DEF. C
U $ C 14/PEISCO (DEF. C
U S C 14/PEBSCO (DEF. C
U S C 14/PEBSCO (DEF. C
U S C 14/PEBSCO (DEF. C
U S C 14/PEBSCO (ONRA)
U S C 14/PEBSCO (081tA)
U S C 14/KBSCO (OBRA)
ONZTED &lAY OF THE INLAN
UNITED UAY OF THE IRLAN
UNITED IMY OF TRE INLM
UNITED RAY OF TIE IllLAN
UNITED IMY OF TIE iNLAN
UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE,
UNITIX; RENTAL SERViCE,
UNITOG RENTAL SERViCE,
UNITOG RENTAL SERViCE,
VAULT INC., THE
VEVLE, ifiLLIM CONRAD
UTTER RAFETY PRODUCTS,
UTTER SAFETY PRaXJCTS,
UTTER SAFETY
UTTER SAFETY
UTTER SAFETY PRIX)tJCTS,
i/AXlE SANITARY SIJPPLY,
IMXIE SMIITARY SUPPLY,
MEST PUBLISN]NG COHPANT
gtlITE CAP IIIXISTRIES,
UNITE rAP INDUSTRIES,
CITY OF TEHECULA
VOUCHERICIEClC REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
DESCEIPTION
EMPLOYEE CONTR!IJTION TO FLEX
E!eLOYEE CONTItlBUI'ION TO FLEX
E14PLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX
ENTERTAIN:RAYOR & COIJNCIL CONF
OFFICE SUPPLIES FON Pg
OFFICE SIJPPLIES FON PU
OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR Pg
CONF:GFOA AIRFARE:G.ROBEDTS
001065 DEF ~
001065 DEF ff
001065 DEF CClf
001065 DEF CClF
001065 DEF CCIF
001065 DEF CCI4P
000389 PT RETIR
000389 PT RETIR
000]89 PT RETIR
UNIFOIU4 NAINTENANCE FOR TCSD
HATS FOR CITY HALL
CEC FLOOR NAYS
UTTS FOR SENION CENTER
NISC. APERTURE CARDS TAPES
LOAN AGREElINT W/BLIND PIG
UGI4ENS LIFEilARD TANK WLOGO
LIFEItAID PRO SHORTS WLOGO
UTTER SAFETY T-SHIRTS
LIFEGUARD EI4BROIDERY
FREIGHT
BLDG NAINT SUPPLIES - ate
BLDG RAINT. $1,,FPLIES - CEC
CA CODES-PENAL 95 (POt. lCE DPT)
E14ERG SUPPLIES:POLY SAND RAG5
TAX
MR
190-1020
100-1020
300-1020
001-100-~-5230
100-16~-604-5220
100-16&-60~-5220
'100-16~-60~-5220
001-14.0'.~"5261
001 '208O
100'2080
1~0-2080
~4,0'2080
001-2160
100-2160
190-2160
001-2120
100-2120
1~5-21Z0
190-2120
ZBO-21ED
1~-1~-999-5~3
34.C)-1~-999-5230
1~-1~-999-5~0
1~-181-999-5~0
~0-199-999-5277
1520
1~0-182-~-5212
lfO-182jF~-5212
100-16&-601-5218
100-16~-601-5218
ITER
-ANQUNT
551.5~
~0.25
12.50
100.00
21.60
6.&1
2
370.00
2,192.18
132.23
23'1 .SO
512.S0
50.00
317.22
60.00
672.16
38.&6
IO.OA
.75
17.00
.75
2O.85
~r, .50
38.23
2O.O&
2,215.75
312.Q0
152.00
96.OO
11.08
55.29
162.43
12~.30
54O.OO
&1.85
PAGE 10
3,7)9.67
100,00
7,0.5O
:~0.00
8~9.38
87.00
113.02
205.38
2,215.75
M5.o8
217.72
129.30
VOUCHRE2
"'~/95 17:51
vuuCHER/
· CHECK: CHECk::
NUMBER DATE
Z3525 05/0~/95
NUMBER
I)QQ3~5
IX)Q34~?
VENDOR
M
XEIIOR CORPOIIATIOR BILLI
ZEE SERVICE CIXlPANY, IN
Cl~ OF TBIE~
VQUCHB/C~ REGISTER
FOR ~LPERZ~S
ITBI
DESCRIPTION
NAY NQNTHY LEASE ON ~ COPI
FIRST AID K:IT REFILlCITY HALL
ACIXIUNT
330-1W-999-5~9
34,0-1~-999-5~2
ITBI
AJ, IOUNT
2,986.12
PAGE 11
,~,,~.
CSEC[
AIIXJNT
2,986.12
&4~.O0
1~6,765.25
VOUCHRE2
*~
CITY OF TENECULA
VOUCJet/CNK[ REGISTER
FOR ALL PiRIODS
PAGE
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
100 GAS TAX FUND
190 COleWNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP
300 INStP, ANC~ RM)
320 INFORNATION SYSTENS
330 ~UPPORT SERVICES
340 FACILITIES
TOTAL
14,215.74
3,729.55
19,618.53
1,095.58
30.47
863.26
35.00
32,169.22
1,021.97
1,293.'54
461
VOUCHRE2
11/95 15:~.
VUUCHER/
CHECK CHECK:
~ER DATE
23528 (:)5/(:)8/95
23529 05/OR/95
23533 05/11/95
2353~ 05/11/95
235:55 05/11
23535 05/11/95
235)6 05/11/95
23537 05/11/95
23538 05/11/95
23539 05/11/95
235/*0 05/11/95 001535
73.%0 05/11/95 001535
35~0 05/11/95 001535
35~.0 05/11/95 001535
235~,1 05/11
23.%2 05/11/95
235~.3 05/11/95
235~. 05/11/95 0004,78
23.5~ 05/11/95 0004,78
235/,5 05/11/95. 000165
235~6 05/11/95 001135
235/*7 05/11/95 000803
235~8 05/11/95 0006~
235~8 05/11/95 000643
23549 05/11/95 0014,63
23550 05/11/95 000993
2355105/11/95 00018~
2355105/11/95 00018/,
;55105/11/95 000184,
;552 05/11/95 001355
CITY OF TEHECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIGOS
VENDOR VENDOR
NUIBER M
0001.% C S n F 0
001522 LAKE ELS[NORE, CiTY OF
001895 A T & T ' VAN NUYS
0019/,7 AJ4ERIGAS
0001.% C S N F 0
00015/, C S 14 F 0
000129 CAL lEST RENTAL CENTER,
0009'~ CALIFORNIA DEPT OF TRAM
001195 CENTRAL SECURITY SERVIC
000/,89 COBB GROUP, THE
CREEKSIDE TEXACO, INC.
CREEKSIDE TEXACO, INC.
CREEKSIDE TEXACO, INC.
CREEKSIDE TEXACO, INC.
000155 DAVLIN
001673 DIVERSIFIED TEMPORARY S
001722
EDt/ARDS, SALLY
FAST SIGNS
FAST SIGNS
FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC.
ITB!
DESCRIPTIGN
CONF:95 LEGISLATIVE GVKr/U
HAYORS' & COUNCIL COlIF
7'505757992001 APRIL
REPAIR OF B/S CHEVEY S-10
CAREER DEVELO COIN BIg/SO
CAREER DEVELO COIN SE!4IIIM/SO
PARK HAINTENANCE RENTAL EQUIP
CALTRARS RETRIC NIGHUAY HAIIM. L
SECURITY & FIRE NONITORING AT
INSIDE PARADOX FOR DOS
VEHICLE HAINT. - PUBLIC liNtKS
VEHICLE HAlfiT. - PIJBLIC VOltKS
VEH]CLE HAINT FOR MLIC t/ORKS
VEHICLE HAlliT - PUBLIC t/ORKS
HAY 1 PLANNING C014 flEETING
TEMP HELP FOR RECEPTIONISTS
PAY INSTR/STORYTIflE ADVENTURE
LETTERING ON NEt/CITY VAN
TAX
EXPRESS MAIL' SERVICES
FIRST CARE INDUSTRIAL N PRE-BIPLOYI4ENT SCREENING
FLAGHOUSE, INC.
FORTNER HARDMARE, INC.
FURTNER HNU)kUkltE, INC.
FOUNTAIN SUITES HOTEL
FREEDCl4 COFFEE, INC.
BINGO GAMES
MISC. SUPPLIES FOR PUBLIC MORK
NISC. SI. FPLIE$ FOR PM
LOOGING/DRUG-ALCOHOL COlIF
COFFEE SUPPLIES CITY HALL
G T E..CALIFORNIA - PAYI4 909-69~-64,00 APRIL
G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYI4 909-695-3539 APRIL
G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYI4 909-699o2309APRIL
G T E CALIFORNIA, INC. EO5&I)3,C,'~,,,-95118 MONTHLY ACCES
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001 - 110-999-5258
001-100-999-5258
320-199-999-5208
001-162-999-521/*
001-1/,0-999-5258
081-1/,0-999-5258
190-180.;999-5Z58
108-16d~-60~-5228
190-182-999-5250
320-199-999-5228
100-1(34-601-521/*
108-16/,-601-521/,
108-164-601-521/*
001-163-999-521/*
001 - 161-999-5250
001-161-999-5118
190-18~-999-5:[50
190-180-999-52~4
190-180-999-52z~
280-199-999-5Z50
001-150-999-52&8
190-180-999-5~01
100-164-601-5218
108-164-601-5218
001-170-999-5261
)60-199-999-5250
220-199-999-5208
320-199-999-5208
328-199-999-5206
320-199-999-5208
ITB
ANOtJNT
65.00
56.~
5.21
53.~
~.50
22.50
~.~
~.~
53.00
~,~
359.45
2~.05
150.~
722.&0
1~.00
154.~
11.~
35.~
~7.~
205.17
56.~
249.~
~.61
28,61
350.~
PAGE I
CliCK
MOUNT
56.00
5.21
· 53.A6
150~J
722.4,O
1&4.00
262,10
2~9,98
87.98
528.55
3,~,,-~!
VCUCHRE2
/**"-,~5
CITY OF TENECULA
VOUCNER/CIIECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK
MUNBER
23553
23553
23553
23553
2355~
2355~
2355~
2355~
23556
23556
23555
23556
23556
23557
23557
23557
~557
23557
23558
23559
23560
23560
23560
23561
2356~
Z356Z
23563
2356G
23565
23566
S567
~567
CHEC3~
DATE
05111195
05111195
051111f5
051111~5
05/111~5
05/11/95
05/11/95
05/11/95
05111195
05/11195
05/11/95
05111195
05/111f5
05/11/f5
05111195
05/111f5
05/11/95
05/11/95
05111/95
05/11/95
05/11/95
05/11/95
05/11/95
05/11/95
05/11/95
05/11/95
05111195
05/11/95
05/11/95
05111/f5
05/11195
05/11/95
05/11/95
05/11/f5
05/11/95
05/11/95
NUHBER
001937
001937
001937
001937
000177
000177
000177
000177
000177
000177
OOO388
OOO388
001351
001/,07
OO16O7
000205
OO1123
001123
M
GALLS, INC.
iLLS, INC.
GALLS, INC.
GALLS, INC.
GLENHIES OFFICE PlffiDUET
GLENHIES OFFICE PRCOL.;"I'
GLENNIES OFFICE PRG)UCT
GLEIIIES OFFICE PlffiDUCT
GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT
ODLLOGLY, CHARL11
GREATER ALARM COlIPAMY,
GREATER ALAIM COleANY,
IIMIKS NAIUXilIE, INC.
IL~KS ILilW~IIE, INC.
HAllKS IINE)MNE, INC.
liA!IKS I¢~INIIIE, INC.
HNIKS PSi, INC.
HANKS IINIDMRRE, INC.
HANKS IIAI)MtlE, INC.
HNIKS HARDgRRE, INC.
IINIKS NAIlMARE, INC.
HEARR, DENISE
HSIEH, LOUISA
I C B O, INC.
I C B O, INC.
I C B O, INC.
INLAND BIPIRE ECQN(X4IC
INTER VALLEY POOL StFPL
INTER VALLEYPOOL SUPPL
INTERNATIONAL ASIOCIATI
KIDS PARTIES, ETC.
KINICO'S OF R!~RSI~, I
KMORR POOr. SYSTENS, INC
~ INOI~TIt!AL IFPLIE
KNOX ]II)USTRIAL SUPPLIE
ITEN
DESatlPTIOR
COMLrr FLASH POMER SIJPPLY
FREIGIff
~rRIIE LIGICTSrrltAFFIC ~
FREIGHT
OFFlEE SUPPLIES-/RESOURCE
OFFICE ~II~LIES/FIMNICf
TC~D OFFICE SlJI~LIES
FIlIAliCE OFFIn; SUPPLIES
RRROMS LAIEL$ RETUIN
RETURNS POCKET FILES
TC~D REFUIID/TEDDY BENt$/MI,~IC
ClECKB) HOTIOH DETECTOR
REPLACE I¢OrtlOR IN CORPUTER
TOOLS, BNJIPNBrr & 14AINTENANCE
NAINT. IIJPPLIES; INTERIN FIRE
SINITS PI~GING SUI~LIES
TCSD NAINTEMANCE SUPPLIES
NAINTENANC~ SUPPLIES-CITY HALL
TCSI) NAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
SPQRTSPROGU/4S SUPPLIES
TCSD HAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
NAINTENANCE SUPPLIES'CITY HALL
TC~D REFtlD/TEDDY BEARS/ItlSIC
HSIEHrrCSI) CLASS REFUND
19c~ B & S PUBLICATIORS
FREIGHT
TAX
SPONSOIt TF.N~ CA LEGISL. DAY
NISC POOr. IUPPLIES OPEN
ONLY RECVD 1&5 GAL OF ACID
DRUGSIALCONOL & !!4PAIRED DItVG
CLOMN FOR EARTH DAY
COPY CENTER VARIOUS SUPPLIES
NISC POOL ~IPPLIES FOR ORC
NlSC. NAIIITEMAIIEE ~FPLIES
TAX
ACCOUMT
MUmER
001-170-999-5216
001 - 170-999-521/.
001-1/0-999-5216
001-170-999-5214,
001-150-999-5220
001 - 160-~-5ZZ0
190-180-999-5220
001-1&0-999-5220
001-1&0-999-5220
001-1&0~999-5220
190-183-6982
)&0-199-999-5250
)&0o199-999-5230
001-171-999-52&2
001 - 171-999-5&70
190-183-999-5380
190-180-999-5212
)/,0-199-999-5212
190-180-999-5212
190-183-999-5)80
190-180-999-5212
)~0-199-999-5212
190-183-&982
190-183-&982
001 - 162-999-5228
001-162-999-5228
001-162-999-5228
001-110-999-5238
190-182-999-5212
190-182-999-5212
001-170-999-5261
190-18~-999-5~20
)30-199-999-5220
190-182-999-5212
lO0-16&-A01-5218
100-1(~-601-5218
ITBI
AletMT
lf9.99
7.39
169.98
5.56
23.58
5.38
9.:5~-
15.97-
)S .00
150,.00
61.83
11.39
)96.87
177.67
67.11
35.00
35.00
.01
61.06
100.OD
316./~
69.93-
1SO.OD
50.OD
93.81
&55,18
35
CHECK
N4OUNT
362.92
302.65
35.00
901
8&9.07
100.OD
150 .OD
~.81
&90 .&6
VOUCHRE2
11/95
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
23568
23570
23570
23571
23572
23573
23573
23574
23575
235?6
235?6
S5TT
S577
J577
23577
23577
2357"/
23577
23577'
23577
23577
23577
Z3577
23578
2357~
23579
23580
23581
23581
23582
2358?.
2358?.
2358?.
3582
~583
15:A4
CHECK
DATE
05/11/95
05111195
05/11/95
05/11/95
05/11/95
05111195
05111195
05111195
05/11/95
05/11/95
05111195
05111195
05/11195
05/11/95
05/11/95
05111/95
05/11/95
05/11/95
05/11/95
05/11/95
05/11/95
05/11/95
05/11/95
05/11/95
05/11/95
05/11/95
05/11/95
05/11/95
05/11/95
05/11/95
05/11/95
05/11/95
05111195
05111195
05111/95
05/11/~5
OO1329
001957
000~14
0O0653
00021~
00021~
000216
000217
000219
000219
0O0239
OOO253
M
LAN
LAB SAFETY SUPPLY, INC.
LAB SAFETY SUPPLY, INC.
LONGS DRUG STORE
LUCKY STORE, INC.
LUNCH & STUFF CATERING
LUNCH & STUFF CATERING
NAGIC KINI)OI4 CLUB NB4B
NARGARITA OFFICIALS ASS
HARTIN 1-HOUR PHOTO
HARTIN 1-HaJR PHOTO
HINUTEI4AN PRESS
HINUTEMAN PRESS
MINUTEMAN PRESS
NINUTB4AN PRESS
!41NUTEI4AN PRESS
NINUTENAN PRESS
MINUTEIUI PRESS
MINUTEMAN PRESS
MINUTEMAN PRESS
HINU'rEHAN PRESS
MIINTB4NI PRESS
MINUTENAN PRESS
NELSON, RICHARD
NEg CON4UNITY LUTHERHI
NEUCQlelMITY LUTHERAN
OLSTEN STAFFING SERVICE
PHOTO bKXtKS
PHOTO VORKS
PLANNING CENTER, INC.,
PLANNING CENTER, INC.,
PLANNING CENTER, INC.,
PLANNING CENTER, INC.,
PLANNING CENTER, INC.,
POSTIqASTER
CITY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERICOS
ITE!4
DESCEIPTZOR
PAY INSTRIOROUP GOLF LEiif. ilS
I!liE SUBSCRIPTIUN; I.S.
SAFETY EQUIP FOR MAINT CItEMS
TAX
F II.14 PURCHASE AND DEVELOPNENT.
SUPPLIES/COOKIE 14OMSTER CLASS
CITY CQUNCIL HEETINGS
SENIOR CITIZEN LLMCIES
RENEIdN. ICHAPTERIK) O82N4
APRIL ADULT VOLLEYBALL REFEREE
PHOTO DEVELOPING FOR NAINT.
PHOTO DEVELOP FOR P.M.
SO0 BUS CARDS/JIN FAULIPV
TAX
500 BUS CARDS/IRENE ROGENG
TAX
5Q0 BUSINESS CARDS/SAIL ZZGLER
TAX
500 BUSINESS CARDS/I'CSD
TAX
500 BUS CARDS/Z. IIZTH/CASHIER
500 BUS CARDS/NO M
TAX
TAX
HALF OF BRIDGE CLASS CANCELLED
R(X]H REFUND/NEV CON4 LUTHERNI
ROOH REFUND/NEU CON4 LUTNERNI
VICL'Y GRAGE/T~Y SERVICES
FIIJ4/DEVELOPING
FII.14 AND FZLN DEVELOPING
GENERAL PLAN SERVICES
GENERAL PLAN SERVICES
GENERAL PLAN SERVICES
CONCLU$1OR OF GENERAL PLAN
CONCLUSIOR OF GENERAL PLAN
EXPRESS RAIL/APRIL
ACCOUNT
NtNBER
190-183-999-5330
~20-199-999-5228
100-164-681-5218
lOO- 16z,-681-5218
190-180-999-5301
190-18~-999-57;0
ool -100.~999-52N)
190-180-999-5260
001-150-999-5226
190-183-999-5380
100-16~-601-5250
001-163-999-5Z50
001 -le3-999-5222
001 - 16~-999-5222
190-180-999-5222
190-180-999-5ZZ2
190-180-999-5222
190-180-999-5222
190-180-999-5222
190-180-999-5222
001-140-999-5ZZ2
001-120-999-5222
001 - 140-999-5222
001-120-999-57.27.
100-183-&982
190-183-4990
100-2900
001-162-999-5118
001-161-999-5Z24
1~-1~-999-5~1
001-161-999-52&8
001-161-999-52&8
ool - 161-999-5248
ool - 161-999-52&8
001-161-999-52&8
001 - 161-999-5230
ITEN
MOUNT
224,00
22..97
156.68
8.52
37.97
40.00
80.00
130.Q0
135.00
316.80
145.22
8.8~
100.00
5.00
652.59
10.73
10.73
5,0Z7.11
207.0S
1,5UB.88
453.30
230.00
PAGE
165.12
37.97
40.00
210.00
1~5.00
316.8Q
15&.06
105.00
452.59
VOUCHRE2
/,-u,/95
Vt,UCHER/
CHEC~
le, J~ER
23583
23583
2358~
23585
2358~
23585
23586
23586
23586
23586
23586
23586
23586
23587
23588
Z5589
23590
23591
23592
23592
23592
23592
23592
23592
23592
23592
23592
23593
23593
23593
23593
23593
23593
23594
3595
15:/,/,
CHECK
DATE
05111195
05111/95
05/11/95
05/11/95
05/11/95
05/11/95
05/11/95
05/11/95
05/11/95
05/11/95
05/11/95
05/11195
95/11/95
05/11/95
05/11/95
05/11/95
05/11/95
95/11/95
05/11/95
05/11/95
05111195
05/11/95
05/11/95
05/11/95.
05/11/95
05/11/95
05/11/95
05/11/95
05/11/95
05/11/95
05/11/95
05/11/95
05/11/95
05/11/95
05/11/95
05/11/95
05/11/95
05111/95
VEIl)OR
IMIER
O00ZS3
O00ZS3
O00262
000262
000262
000262
000262
000262
000262
0010/6
OO0266
000266
O00266
000266
000352
0O0958
000519
O00519
M
POSTNASTER
POSTNASTER
POUELL, BAERBEL
~E~'E~B~I~a314PM
~E~'ENTER~I~a314PI
~E~'ENTER~I~Ca4PGN
RANClIO CALIFOItNIA HATER
RANCliO CALIFORNIA bIATER
ILANCHO CALIFORNIA btATER
P, ANCHO CALI FGNNIA UATER
RANClIO CALIFGNNIA iNTER
RANCliO CALZFGNNIA HATER
RANClIO CAt. IF(XtNIA HATER
RANCHO INDUSTRIAL SI, JPPL
RIGHTIMY
RIGHTUAY
RIGHTHAY
RIGHTtMY
RIVERSIDE CO. ASSESSOR
ROBERT CARAN PRCOU~IGN
S C SINN(A: KING, ST
S C SIGNS AKA: KING, ST
S C SIGNS AKA: KING, ST
S C SIGNS AKA: KING, ST
S C SIGNS AKA: KING, ST
S C SIGNS AKA: KING, ST
S C SIGNS AKA: KING, ST
S C SIGNS AKA: KING, ST
S C SIGNS AKA: KING, ST
S K S, INC/INI. AND OIL
S K S, INC/INLAI) OIL
S K S, INCIINLAND OIL
S K S, INC/INLAMD OIL
S K S, INC/INLAND OIL
S K S, INC/INLJUID OIL
SHNai SCOTT POOL & SPA
SOUTH COLMTY PEST ~3NTR
SOUTH COUNTY PEST CGITR
CITY OF TB4ECULA
V~ICHER/CNECK REGISTER
FOIl ALL PERICOS
ITEX
DESCRIPTIGN
EXPIESS IlL/APRIL
EXPRESSilL/APRIL
TCSD REFUND/I'EDOY IEARS/MIJSIC
ADS/TI3D SEASaIL POSITIGNS
MR RECRUITMENT ADS
RONMMY tJR)ATES/CIP
03116-04/18 HATER CHARGES
03/16-04/18 HATER CHARGES
03/16-Q~/18 HATER CHARGES
03/16-04/18 HATER CHARGES
0~/16-0&/18 HATER ClMRGES
03/16-0&/18 HATER CHA~GES
010684300-1 PUBLIC MIlS HATER
KMST SUPPLIES FGN CITY HALL
APRIL 95 lIR LEGAL SERVICES
PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL
KITABLE TOILET RENTAL
PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL
PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL
IMP COPIES FOR TCSD
4TH OF JULY FIREgalUCS
Pi_&NNING SIGNS DECENBER 199&
PLANNING SIGNS FEBRUARY 1995
PROPERTY- SIGN POSTING/FEB 95
PLANNING SIGNS JNIUARY 1995
CITY CLK SIGNS JAIJARY 1995
PLANNING SIGNS NOVBIER 1995
CITY CLK SIGNS NOVEMBER 1995
PLANNING SIGNS OCT 199&
CiTY CLK SIGNS OCTOGER 199&
FUEL CHARGES
FUEL CHARGES
FUEL CHARGES
FUEL CEARGES
FUEL CHARGES
FUEL CHARGES
POOL HAINTENANC~ SERVICES
PEST CONTROL SERVICES FOR
PEST CONTROL SERVICES FOR CRC
/R
001 - 120-999-5230
001-110-999-5230
190-183-4982
190-180-999-525~.
001 - 150-999-52S4~
001 - 165-999-525~.
190-180-999-52&0
190-181-999-52&0
190-182;'999-5240
191-180-999-52&0
193-180-999-524,0
34,0'199-999-524,0
100-16~-601-5240
3&0-199-999-5212
001 - 130-999-5247
190-180-999-5Z38
190-180-999-5Z58
19O-180-999-5Z58
190-180-999-5238
190-180-999-5ZZ0
190-18~-999-5370
001-161-999-5256
001-161-999-5236
001-120-999-52&&
001-16t-999-5256
001-1;0-999-524~
001-161-999-5256
001-120-999-52~r~
001-161-999-5ZS6
001 - 120-999-524~
100-16&-601-526~
001-163-999-5263
001-165-999-5Zt3
001-110-999-52d3
190-180-999-52~
001 - 162-999-5Z63
190-180-999-5212
190-181-999-5250
190-182-999-5250
ITB4
N4OIMT
28.00
21.50
35.00
3~9.14 -
103.52
120.60
1,660.80
97.45
72?..65
119.86
813.01
10.9/,,
13.4,3
59.12
52.50
62.89
lZ5.78
62.89
231.55
6~.50
206.S0
42.00
29.00
PAGE
CHECK
92.S0
35.00
575.26
3,438.1/,
S9.12
52.50
503.11
64.50
9,000.O0
775.37'
2O6.50
71 .IX)
VOUCHRE2
11/95
VuJCHER/
CHECK
NUNBER
Z3596
2:3596
23596
23596
23596
23596
2:359?
Z3597
25598
23599
23599
236(X)
23601
Z3601
~602
Z3607
Z3610
23611
Z3611
23612
Z3613
S613
15:~4
CHECk:
DATE
05111195
05111/95
05111/95
05111/95
05111195
05111/95
05111195
05111195
05/11/95
05111195
05/11/95
05/11/95
05/11/95
05/11/95
05/11/95
05/11/95
05/11/95
05 / 11/95
05/11/'95
05111195
05/11/95
05/11/95
05/11/95
05/11/95
05/11/95
05/11/95
05/11/95
05/11/95
05/11/95
05/11/95
05/11/95
05/11/95
VENDOR
NtNBER
000537
00053/
00053/
000537
00053/
00053/
000926
000926
000375
000299
000299
000/,65
000574
000574
000168
000905
000306
000320
001179
001179
001881
001881
000~5
000345
001918
001918
VEI)OI~
M
EDUTHERId CAt. IF ED!ION -
SOUTHElla CALIF ED!Ill -
SOUTHERN CAt. IF EDISON -
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON -
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON -
SOUTHEll CALIF EDISON -
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON -
SOtJ'rHBIN CAt. IF EDIil -
~OUTIERN CALIF TELEPHOII
ITRACNOTA II1~ A~E
ETRACHOTA filIAlill All
ETRADLEY, MARY ICATHLEEN
SUPERTONER
SUPERTIER
TEH~(::ULA FLOUER CORRAL
TEHECULA IHUTTLE SERVIC
TB!CULA VN.LEY PIPE &
TIE INTER STATIONERS
TRAOE I C(X!!RCE AHENCY
THEBOR (XaMPANY INC., TH
TREBOR COMPLY INC., TH
UNITO~ RENTAL HERVII,
UNITQG RENTAL SERVICE,
lITON RENTAL SERVICE,
WATER MFETY PE00UCT$,
WATER $AFETY PE(XXJCTI,
WZLCI(, EUk!HE
XBtQK lITION IlLLI
SEre31 CORPORATION BILLI
XERON-COPIER EDURCE
ZUMAR III)UETR1Ei, INC.
ZUI4AR INDUSTRIES, INC.
CITY OF TBIECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERILS
ITEN
DES13tIPTION
APRIL IllVICE ~ A
APRIL IllVICE lidEL l
01/05-05102 TCI) IIVICEI
APRIL CEC SERVIilS
APIilL SERVICE LEVEL A SflVICES
APRIL SEItVICE LEVEL C ~RVICES
03/22-Q4/~2 I CENTER SERVICES
527R191025 OZ/OB-051QZ
909-312-0474 TH APRIL
ItTRA IM!ICIAL POLICY
AfTNA/CIAL POLICY
BELLY DIll EXERCISE CLA~
TONER FOR lIP LASER JET l
TAX
~DRIL FLGIRS/SUNSHINE FtMD
TRANSPORTATION; CONFESENCE
TCl) IMIET. All REPAIR OF PARK
OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR LAND DEVEL
LUNCHEON/TENI CALIF/NJ!~
RENTAL OF FLASHING BEACONS
TAX
IN MA!!iT
IN MAINT CEEWS UIIIFilNi 051051
IIF0111 IMIITBIAICE FOR
LIFEGUARD BillOil L__O~__
FREIGIrr
· TCI) HEFIII/I!IGHT ERAIN MT
Ffi - AMtlL RAIlEl CHNIIf
APRIL XflII
LEASf OF COPIER
STENCILS FOR
TAX
NUIIER
191-180-999-5319
192-180-999-5319
190-180-999-524,0
190-182-999-5240
191-180-999-5319
193-180-999-57.~0
1VO-181-999-5244)
· 190-180-999-5240
320-199..,999-5208
300-199-999-520&
300-1M5
190-183-999-5~0
001-1/0-999-5220
001-1/0-999-5220
001-21/0
001-100-999-5258
190-180-999-5212
001-163-999-5220
00 1 - 110-999- 5258
100-164-601-5238
100-1t4-601-5Z38
100-16&-(d)l-5243
100-164-601-5243
190-180-999-52~
190-180-999-52/:3
190-180-999-5243
190-11-4982
530-199-999-5217
~0-199-V99-SZ~9
190-182-999-5239
100-16&-e01-5218
100-16~-601-5218
ITEN
927.83
30.47
1,235.55
59.68
47.89
50.25
10,/Z3,22
21,&&6,00
45.00
3.49
107.21
50.00
16.16
14.47
23.50
23.50
10.85
52.50
1,21&.10
117.8~
PAGE 5
2,351.67
1,839.48
&6.24
107.21
16. a6
14.47
660.00
1,2M.tO
117.8&
V'OUCHIIE2
16:28
CITY OF TFJ, ICtJLA
VOUCHER/CHIC:X: REGISTER
FOIl ALL PERILS
FUND TIT~I:
001 GENERAL RJIID
100 P,,AS TAX FUll
190 ClIIIIITY SERVICES DISTRICT
210 CAPITAL II, I'ROVEHIIIT PlOJ Fill
280 REDEVELOPIIEIIT AGENCY - tip
390 TClO DEBT $ERVICE ,.
TOTAL
13,378.58
20,95'7.16
1Z,5'S6.gO
106,2&9.35
31~/,82~J~3
3,6&1.05
VOUCHRE2
1195 16:28
VIIUCHER/
CHECX: CHECK VEIlDOll
NUIIER DATE NUI4BER
Z$617 05/23/95
Z5618 05/23/95
2:5619 05/Z5/95
23619 05/23/95
23620 05/23/95 0016~
23620 05/23/95 001693
23623 05/23/9S 001956
~626 05/Z5/95 001501
S27 05/23/9S 000431'
23629 05/23/95 001007
Z5629 05/23/9S 001001'
2363O 05,'23,'95
Z~630 05/23/95
23631 05/23/95 001713
23631 05/23/95 '001713
23631 05/23,'95 001713
23631 05/23/95 001713
05/23/95 001585
05/23/95 001585
37 05/Z5/95
;8 05/23/95
05/23/95
CITY OF TEIECULA
VCUCNER/CNECK REGISTER
F011 ALL PERIDDS
VENDOR ZTEI4 ACC0UliT
M DESCIIPTION litleER
0O1538 ALBRET m & ASSOCIA PROGRESS IN4T-TRFFC SIGNAL PALA 21Q-16S-6&5-58~
000102 NIRICAN ~ CO. OF C
OO1072
FENC~ (IAI33TDP) REPAIR - S.P.
M OF N4ERICA NT & NA SENI-ANNUAL IMIST/IQIIS
~ OF NIRICA lIT & SA I!!II-AMNAL NAIST/"'BmlIS
EBNOImSQN CQIiSqlmCl'iON
EBlelIDS~N I:~NSTRUCTION
EBGIL CONPOIIATIaN
HDLCIXRBI&COliE, INC
KRDC, INC.
LEIGHTON & A555~IATES,
14ARGARITA OFFICIALS ASS
MAltIliA CGI/TRACTCIIS, IMC
NOP. ELAND & ASSOCIATES
IIMRIETA D~NT CO
NPGCQIIP.
NPGC:~P.
NATIONAL SANITARY SUPPL
NATIONAL NITMY SUPPL
NalIRIS'REPIZ, INC.
NORRIS'REPK~, INC.
NDIRItISoREPIZ, INC.
NORRIS'REPlY, INC.
PAUL GHIDIIER CDIUKIATIO
PAUL GHU)IIER CBIIPOIAT!O
NAY ONAGE AND
RII/IRIIDE IX). AUDIlIR
RiI~R$IDE C:Q. AUDITat
RIVERSIDE CO. INEIIIFF'I
001097 ROADLINE PtalXJCT$, INC.
001097 ROADLINE PRODUCTS, !liC.
001682 ROlElIT ICANN, JOHN KAIN
001682 :ROIEItT IOUI, JONN rAIN
000539 b/!I!4ER YARADA A~,~j~!ATE
APR 05 PI!OGRESS-MIMCNESTER
RETENTION WH INV 758-3-05
FEB 95 PLAN C!EI:~ SEII1/S
CI~ Ir~!T/9&-95 IqlOP TAX
REINB IOTMICAL
NAIl 95 S!XVS-PALA ID-RIGT TIJIN
APRIL IT SI.DMPITI:H IMPIRES
RELEASE STOP P!4T FOR RONEBTSON
AUDIT/STATE/LOCAL TRANS PROGH
FGI4 ~ POUR PALA lID CNAHNF. L
~ & REPLACE ASPHALT
CRC & RE.CTR. FLOCI SCilLIER
TRX
JNI 95 EBG sBr4-1ST ST DEZDGE
FEB 95 EBG SERVS-1ST ST IRZDGE
FEB 95 Ear- SERVS-IST ST BRIDGE
CIVIL EBGINEBRING SERVICES FOR
APR P~SS I~-TRAF SIGS~N
baufflON WH IMV 94~1)*)
PLAM CX SERVIC~S/FES 1998
ARt 95 PP~IM6 CITATION
APt 95 PPXIM6 CITATION ASRSI4
NISC PARTS far Pd SI'EMCXL TRUC
TAX
COMSULTING SSV/OLD TOidN/?JgS
C~MSULTIMG SBtV/OLD TOMM/2/gS
APltlL SEItVIC~S/PALA
190-180-999-5212
390-199-999-5227
210-165-64~1-580~
210-2035
001-162-.999-5248
210-1(~-~52-5802
190-165-999-5380
210-2038
001-1280
100-16&-601-S&01
100-164,-601-S~2
100-164-601
190-180-999-5610
190-180-999-5610
280-199-807-5802
280-199-807-5802
280-199-807-5892
280-199-807-5802
210-165-64~-580&
210-20~
001-162-999-5248
001-2260
001
100-16&-601-5218
100-16&.,601-5218
280-199-999-52&8
280-1270
210-190-120-5802
TOTAL
ITB4
N4elMT
1,675.00
,r,,739.00
8S9.22
2,781.83
67,993.00
6,799.30-
4,6~2.86
2/,00.05
8,900.00
1,956.50
1,051.01
1,700.00
1,222.00
5,&18.00
6,016.Z5
12,368.50
3,939,25
&2,134,.60
1,031.92
1,055.00
950,0Q
1,638.80
1,018.25
78.91
2,395.25
2,3~5.25
2,&72.00
PAGE 1
1,675.00
3,6&1.05
61,193 .?0
'
8,900.00
1,916.50
1,980.00
1,051.01
1,1'~
1
1 ,(81.92
2,QaS,00
1,638.80
1,097.16
2,472.80
ITEM 4
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
APPROV~
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICE
CITY MANAGER
City Council/City Manager
Anthony Elmo, Chief Building Official,,~
May 23, 1995
Public Nuisance Abatement- 30301 Nicolas Road
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council set the date of a public hearing for June 13,
1995, at 7:00 p.m. at 30875 Rancho Vista Road, for the purpose of confirming the cost to
the City for the abatement of a public nuisance at 30301 Nicolas Road.
DISCUSSION: On April 25, 1995, the City Council held a public hearing to confirm the
costs to the City of the abatement of a public nuisance at 30301 Nicolas Road. It has come
to our attention that the property's owners were not properly notified of that public hearing
date. Therefore, to assure that all property owners are given the opportunity to address this
issue before the City Council, it will be necessary to rehear public testimony regarding this
matter.
The purpose of the public hearing is to confirm the cost of abatement of this property by the
City and to cause the recording of a special assessment against the property in the total
amount of $68,856.75. A breakdown of costs which make up this total amount:
Environmental Control Systems, Inc.
Attorney's fees
Administrative costs
Staff costs
$58,600.00
8,297.64
525.00
$1.434.11
Grand Total
e68,856.75
V:~AGENDA.REP,.~s__I .HNG
ITEM 5
APPROVAL ~
CITY ATTORNE
FINANCE OFFIC
CITY MANAGE
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Council/City Manager
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works\City Engineer
May 23, 1995
Solicitation of Construction Bids for Access Ramps Project - PW95-04
PREPARED BY: ~ Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects
Scott Harvey, Associate Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council approve the plans and specifications and authorize the Department .0f
Public Works to solicit public construction bids for Access Ramps - Project PW95-04.
BACKGROUND:
The plans, specifications and contract documents have been completed and the project is
ready to be advertised for construction bids. This project will modify 23 concrete handicap
access ramps at various locations throughout the City to comply with the most recent
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements. The engineer's estimate for the project
is $27,000.
This project is being funded by the Federal Government with Community Development Block
Grant (CDBG) funds which are administered by the Riverside County Economic Development
Agency (EDA). The EDA has reviewed and approved the bid documents for advertisement.
In addition to the City's standard advertising process, the Federal Government requires the
City to fulfill the minority and women business enterprise participation. To meet this
requirement the City will send a Notice Inviting Bids to minority publications, business
information centers and local minority newspapers.
FISCAL IMPACT:
This project will be funded by Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds.
ITEM 6
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
May 23, 1995
Contract Change Order No. 4 for Winchester Road Interim Street
Improvements, Project PW94-03
PREPARED BY:
Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects
Scott Harvey, Associate Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council:
Approve Contract Change Order No. 4 for Winchester Road Interim Street
Improvements, Project PW94-03 for Additional Aggregate Base - Class 2 in the amount
of $27,660.00.
e
Approve a budget transfer in the amount of $24,537.64 from the Pavement
Management Project and appropriate in the Winchester Road Interim Street
Improvements Project.
BACKGROUND:
During the grading operation of the Winchester Road Interim Street Improvements, Project
PW94-03 the contractor found that the quantities for the aggregate base and sub-base were
more than the original contract bid items. The contractor will eliminate the Class 3 base bid
item which was used to match the existing Caltrans designed road section and increase the
Class 2 base bid item. The contractor will also reduce the unit price of the Class 2 base from
$100/ton to $23.5/ton as a result of the estimated increase in quantities. This brings the total
aggregate material price to $34,075, which is $27,660 more than the original bid amounts.
The balance of project's contingency is $3,122.36, therefore a budget transfer in an amount
of $24,537.64will be required from the Pavement Management Project.
FISCAL IMPACT:
On November 29, 1994, the City Council awarded a contract for the construction of
Winchester Road Interim Street Improvements, Project No. PW94-03 to Chance Edmondson
in the of $256,407.57. Contract Change Order No.'s 01 through 3 were approved by the City
Manager for a total amount of $22,518.40. Contract Change Order No. 4 is in the amount
of $27,660.00, of which $24,537.64 is over the 10% contingency. A budget transfer in an
amount of $24,537.64 will be required from the Pavement Management Project (account
pwO4~egdf!~95%O523%pw94..03 .er, o 061195
number 210-165-655-5804)to the Winchester Road Interim Street Improvements Project
(account number 210-165-641-5804). Both projects are Capital Improvement Projects to be
funded by Measure "A". Savings have been identified in the Pavement Management Project.
Attachments:
Contract Change Order No. 4
pwO4~,egdrpt%95%O523%pw94-03 .oco 051195
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive · Ternecula, California 92590
(909) 694-1989 o FAX (909) 694-1999
CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 4
CONTRACT NO. PW94-03
PROJECT:
Winchester Road Interim Street Imorovement
SHEET 1__ of 1__
TO CONTRACTOR: Chance Edmondson
NOTE:
This chance order is not effective until aDoroved bv the Enoineer.
CHANGE REQUESTED BY: Project Inspector
A. EXTRA WORK {l~ FORCE ACCOUNT (TIME AND MATERIALS):
1. Additional Agoreoate Base - Class 9. During the construction
the contractor found that the actual baso matedHal quantities
were more than the original contract bid hems. The contractor
will eliminate the Clam 3 base bid item and increase the Class 2
base bid item by the same thickness of the Class 3 base. Also,
the contractor will reduced the unit price of the Class 2 base
from $1 001ton to $23.51ton. This will bring the total estimate
quantity of aggregate matedHal to 1,450 tons at a cost of
$34,075, which is $27,660 more than the original bid amounts.
AMOUNT
TOTAL ......................................
$27,660.00
Original Contract Amount ................................... $ 256,407.57
Adjusted Contract Amount .................................. $ 278,925.97
Change Order No. 4( + ) .................................... + $ 27,660.00
Total Contract Amounl~ ..................................... $ 306,585.97
Adjustment of Working Days .................................
Approvad: Principal Engr. By: '
We the undersigned contractor have given careful co proposed and hereby agree. If t~/proposd il epproved,
that we will provide ell equipment, furnish cil meTariciLsid'eree exee;;~sto~be noted above, end perform dl eewioee necessary for
the work above specified, and will accept es full payment therefore the prices shown above.
Date Accepted: cJ-I"~-'~<J' Contractor: ~_..~>t-~Qir--~%--~--~
(company's name)
(signature)
Title:
Name :'~,,%~
(print)
if the contractor does not sign acceptance of thie order, his mention is directed to the requirements of the specifications ee to proceeding
with the ordered work and filing a written protect within the time therein specified.
~)Printed on Recycled Pai:)er.
ITEM 7
APPROVAl R~
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFIC
CITY MANAGE
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Council/City Manager
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works\City Engineer
May 23, 1995
Solicitation of Construction Bids for Sidewalk Improvements on Rancho.
Vista Road and Mira Loma Drive - Project PW94-19
PREPARED BY:
Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects
Scott Harvey, Associate Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council approve the construction plans and specification and authorize the
Department of Public Works to solicit public construction bids for sidewalk improvements on
Rancho Vista Road and Mira Loma Drive - Project PW94-19.
BACKGROUND:
Each fiscal year the State Public Utilities Code (Senate Bill 821) sets aside 2% of the Local
Transportation Funds in the County of Riverside to fund facilities for the exclusive use of
pedestrians and bicyclists. The City of Temecula was one of sixteen proposals that the
Riverside County Transportation Commission approved for funding.
The plans, specifications and contract documents have been completed and the project is
ready to be advertised for construction bids. This project will provide continuous sidewalk
around Vail Elementary School, the Mira Loma/Rancho Vista loop (see Exhibit "A") and
sidewalk on the south side of Rancho Vista Road at the east end of Temecula Valley High
School (see Exhibit "B"). SB 821 Funds for FY 1994-95 will provide $27,680 (80% of the
total cost) towards the project's estimated cost of $34,600.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The project will receive $27,680 in SB 821 funds which are administrated by the Riverside
County Transportation Commission with the balance of the construction in the amount of
$6,920 to be funded through Development Impact Fees.
puSST
N.T.S.
RD
:OLINAS
PL
C
PROJECT LIMITS
DEL CAM'
RD.
CITY OF TEMEGULA
TI,~I~A VISTA
PROPOSED SB 821
SIDEWALK PROJECT
F'Y 1994-95
MIRA LOMA DR.- LOOP
EXHIBIT · A '
DATE: May 9.1995
RANCHO CALIFORNIA
2 CLE RIO VISTA
c~-~F.-
1 CALLE BAHIA VISTA
ARROYO
ALAMAR,,)
/2
RTE'
TUNA
CORTE
/x~OR ~
SA DR TE
~PROJECT LIMITS
TEMECULA
HIGH SCHOOL
N.T.S.
SPORTS PARK
PAUBA
CITY
OF TEMECULA
PROPOSED SB 821
SIDEWALK PROJECT
FY 1994-95
RANOHO VISTA RD.
DATE: Moy 9,1995
EXHIBIT 'B'
PROCLAMATIONS/
PRESENTATIONS
C rtifwate o f Apl, reeiation
citizens deeply appreciate their high level of commitment to making their community a better
place to five.
IN ~S WUJ~EOF, I have hereunto
atExed my hand and official seal this
23rd day of May, 1995
Jeffrey E. Stone
Mayor
June S. Greek, CIVIC
c~ty C~erk
City of Temecula
Certificate of Appreciation
In apprechtion and gratitude from the City Coundl on behalf of the
cid-ens of the City of Temecula,
For their generous support of the Old Town Temecula Senior Center by assisting in the
purchase of a h~ndic~pped equipped van to better serve the needs of the Senior Citizens of
Temecula.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto
affixed my hand and official seal this
23rd day of May, 1995
leffrey E. Stone
Mayor
lune S. Greek, CMC
City Clerk
ITEM 8
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL R~
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFIC R
CITY MANAGE
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
May 23, 1995
Supplement No. 007 to Local Agency Agreement No. 008-5459 for
Federal Aid Projects No. BRLS-5459(003)for Federal Grant Funding for
Pale Road Bridge
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 95-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT NO. 007, TO
LOCAL AGENCY AGREEMENT NO. 08-5459, BETWEEN THE
STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE CITY OF
TEMECULA FOR FEDERAL AID PROJECT NO. BRLS-5459(003),
PALA ROAD BRIDGE
BACKGROUND:
In conjunction with the preliminary engineering for Pale Road Bridge Replacement, several
studies are required by the Corp of Engineers, Department of Fish and Game and Caltrans.
These studies include Historical Evaluation of existing bridge, Hydrology end Hydraulics of the
existing channel of Temecula Creek, and preliminary alignment studies. The cost of the above
studies, for which the County (AD159) received proposals is $270,000. The hydrology and
hydraulics study is completed, other studies will be awarded to consultants in the near future.
The $270,000 represents the costs of preliminary assessments prior to beginning the design
phase. The Federal Grant amount is 80% or $216,000 with 20% local match or $54,000.
The local match will be shared by the County of Riverside (AD 159), and the City.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Funds will be available in the Capital Improvement Budget, if approved by the City Council,
Fiscal Year 1995-2000, Pale Road Bridge.
- 1 - r.~gdrl~gb"%O523%sul~OO7.egn/eile
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution No. 95-
2. Supplement No. 007 to Local Agency Agreement No. 08-5459
for Federal Aid Projects BRLS-5459(003)for Federal
Grant Funding for Pala Road Bridge
-2- r.~ag(ImZ%gS~O522%eupOO7.egn/alp
RESOLUTION NO.
A RF~OLUTION OF THE C1TY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING SUPPIJ~:MENT NO. 007, TO
LOCAL AGENCY AGI~F-I~tENT NO. 08-54~9, Bk;rws,:s,:N
THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND
THE CITY OF T]~4ECULA FEDERAL Am PRO~.~'r NO.
BRI~9(003 BI~IDGE I/EPLACEMENT, PALA ROAD.AT
TEMECIJIA C~F. EK_ (BR. NO. 57C-165')
The City Council of the City of Temecula does resolve, determine and order as follows:
WHEREAS, City Council at their regHi.r meeting of March 23rd, 1993 adopted
Resolution No. 93-26.
WI~'3~EAS, ~aid Re~lution approved the Local Agency/State Agreement No. 08-S459.
WH~:KF_,AS, said Resolution provided for supplemental agreements to be adopted by the
Council for each individual project which utilizes the Federal Funds.
WHEREAS, City has applied for Federal Funds to perform the preliminary engineerhg
study on replacement of Pala Road Bridge at Temecula Creek, BR. No. 57C-165.
~VIIEREAS, these funds are available and subject to Program Supplement No. 007 for
Local Agency State Agreement for Federal Aid Pwject No. BRJ~-5459(003).
NOW, THEREFOR, BE 1T RESOLV!~ by the City Council of the City of Temecula,
as follows:
Section 1.
Section 2.
That the City Council appwve and authorize execution of Program
Supplement No. 007 to Local Agency State Agreement for Federal Aid
Project No. BRLS-5459(003).
Authorize the Mayor to execute said Agreement.
Section 3. The City Clerk shall codify the adoption of this resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temeafia
at a regular meeting held on the 23rd day of May, 1995.
ATTEST:
Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor
June S. Greek
City Clerk
-3- r:~agdqat~6~O523%eulK)OT. egn/elp
[S~L] _,,,,
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, lune S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that
Resolution No. 95- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 23rd day of May, 1995 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
CO~CILM~ERS:
CO~CIL1WEMBERS:
CO~CILMEMBERS:
CO~CILlW~-~~:
-4- r..~agdq~SS~:)523%eupOO7.agrdajl;
STATE OF CAUFORNIA---NJSINE~, TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
(909) 383-5959
May 10, 1995
08-Riv-0-TEM
BRLS-5459 (003)
Pala Road @ Temecula
Creek Br. No. 56C-0165
Bridge Replacement
WILSON, Governor
]~'. Joseph Kicak
Director of Public Works/
City Engineer
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
: By
Dear ~. Kicak:
Enclosed for your execution are two Program Supplements
No. 007 to Local Agency-State Agreement for Federal-Aid Project
No. 08-5459 for the above-referenced project.
Please type in the date of execution and return the original
documents with a certified copy of the authorized resolution to
this office no later than June 15, 1995. This will allow our
staff in Sacramento to process this agreement prior to June 30.
Execution beyond the requested date may require re-execution of
an additional program supplement agreement after July 1. Your
prompt cooperation will reduce processing time for all concerned.
After completion of these documents, your original document
will be returned for your files.
If you have. any questions, please call Mr. Ernie Rogers at
(909) 383-4578.
Very truly yours,
LOUIS W. FLORES
Chief, Local Assistance
Encl.
Date: May 3, 1995
PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT NO. 007~}k~A. Looation= 08-RIV-0-TEM
to "" "~"'~roject N-mher: BRLS-5459(003)
LOCAL AGENCY-STATE AGREEMENT E.A. Number: 08-198274
FOR FEDERAL-AID PROJECTS NO. 08-5459
This Program Supplement is hereby incorporated into the Local Agency-St
Agreement for Federal Aid which was entered into between the Local Agen~f
and the State on 03/23/93 and is subject to all the terms and conditions
thereof. This Program Supplement is adopted in accordance with Paragraph 2
of Article II of the aforementioned Master Agreement under authority of
Resolution No. , approved by the Local Agency on
(See copy attached).
The Local Agency further stipulates that as a condition to payment of funds
obligated to this project, it accepts and will comply with the covenants or
remarks setforth on the following pages.
PROJECT TERMINI:
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, PALA RD @ TEMECULA CREEK, BR. NO. 57C-165
TYPE OF WORK: REPLACE BRIDGE
LENGTH: 0.1 (MILES)
PROJECT CLASSIFICATION OR PHASE(S) OF WORK
IX] Preliminary Engineering [ ] Right-of-Way
[ ] Construction Engineering [ ] Construction
[ ]
Estimated Cost~ Federal Funds
Matching Funds
270000 118 $ 216000 $
$ 0
Local OTHER OTHER
54000 $ 0 $
City of Temecula
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Department of Transportation
By
By
Chief, Local Assistance
District 8
Date Date
Attest
Title
I hereby Certify upon e/personal knowtedge that budgeted funds are avaitable for this enct~bra~ce:
t Program Iec] Fund Source
216000.00
N~OIJNT
139 1W4 2660-101-890 9~,-95 20.30.010.300 C 22~,060 892-F
216000.00
Page i of 2
08 -RIV-0-TEM
BRLS-5459(003)
SPECIAL COVENANTS OR REMARKS
DATE: 05/03/95
1. The Local Agency will advertise, award, and administer this
project and will obtain the State's concurrence prior to either
award or rejection of the contract.
2. The Local Agency agrees the payment of Federal funds will be
limited to the amounts approved by the Federal Highway
Administration in the Federal-Aid Project Agreement (PR-2)/Detail
Estimate, or its modification (PR-2A) or the FNM-76, and accepts
any increases in Local Agency Funds as shown on the Finance or
Bid Letter or its modification as prepared by the State and Local
Project Development Program.
3. This Program Supplement will be revised at.a later date to
include other phases of work.
4. In executing this Program Supplemental Agreement, Local
Agency hereby reaffirms the "Nondiscrimination Assurances"
contained in the aforementioned Master Agreement for
Federal-Aid Program.
5. Whenever the local agency uses a consultant on a cost plus basis,
the local agency is required to submit a post audit report cover-
ing the allowability of cost payments for each individual consul-
tant or sub-contractor incurring over $25,000 on the project.
The audit report must state the applicable cost principles utili'
zed by the auditor in determining allowable costs as referenoed in
CFR 49, part 18, Subpart C - 22, Allowable Costs.
Page 2 of 2
Date: May 3, 1995
PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT NO..007 ~'~.~,T.~,~ .~, Location: 08-RIV-0-TEM
to Project Number= BRLS-5459 (003)
LOCAL AGENCY-STATE AGREEMENT E,A, Number: 08-198274
FOR FEDERAL-AID PROJECTS NO. 08-5459
This Program Supplement is hereby incorporated into the Local Agency-S'
Agreement for Federal Aid which was entered into between the Local Age._.f
and the State on 03/23/93 and is subject to all the terms and conditions
thereof, This Program Supplement is adopted in accordance with Paragraph 2
of Article II of the aforementioned Master Agreement under authority of
Resolution No. , approved by the Local Agency on
(See copy attached).
The Local Agency further stipulates that as a condition to payment of funds
obligated to this project, it accepts and will comply with the covenants or
remarks setforth on the following pages.
PROJECT TERMINI:
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, PALA RD @ TEMECULA CREEK, BR. NO. 57C-165
TYPE OF WORK: REPLACE BRIDGE
LENGTH: 0.1 (MILES)
PROJECT CLASSIFICATION OR PHASE(S) OF WORK
[X] Preliminary Engineering [ ] Right-of-Way
[ ] Construction Engineering [ ] Construction
[ ]
Estimated Cost~ Federal Funds
Matching Funds
270000 118 $ 216000 $
$ o
Local OTHER
54000 $ o $
OTHER
City of Temecula
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Department of Transportation
By
By
Chief, Local Assistance
District 8
Date Date
Attest
Title
I hereby Certify upon my personat kno. tedge that buctgeted funcis are svai tabte for this encuabrance:
t Program Iscl Fund Source
216000.00
139 1996 2660-101-890 9&-95 20.30.010.300 C 22~,060 892-F
21(:4)00.00
Page I of 2
08 -RIV-0-TEM
BRLS-5459 (003)
SPECIAL COVENANTS OR REMARKS
DATE: 05/03/95
1. The Local Agency will advertise, award, and administer this
project and will obtain the State's concurrence prior to either
award or rejection of the contract.
2. The Local Agency agrees the payment of Federal funds will be
limited to the amounts approved by the Federal Highway
Administration in the Federal-Aid Project Agreement (PR-2)/Detail
Estimate, or its modification (PR-2A) or the FNM-76, and accepts
any increases in Local Agency Funds as shown on the Finance or
Bid Letter or its modification as prepared by the State and Local
Project Development Program.
3. This Program Supplement will be revised at.a later date to
include other phases of work.
4. In executing this Program Supplemental Agreement, Local
Agency hereby reaffirms the "Nondiscrimination Assurances"
contained in the aforementioned Master Agreement for
Federal-Aid Program.
5. Whenever the local agency uses a consultant on a cost plus basis,
the local agency is required to submit a post audit report cover-
ing the allowability of cost payments for each individual consul-
tant or sub-contractor incurring over $25,000 on the project.
The audit report must state the applicable cost principles utili-
zed by the auditor in determining allowable costs as referenced in
CFR 49, part 18, Subpart C - 22, Allowable Costs.
Page 2 of 2
ITEM 9
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
May 23, 1995
Amended Memorandum of Understanding -
Access to Winchester Road and State Route 79 South
PREPARED BY: Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council APPROVE the amended Memorandum of Understanding with Caltrans
and AUTHORIZE the Mayor to sign.
BACKGROUND:
Attached you will find an amended Memorandum of Understanding |MOU) between the City
of Temecula and the State of California Caltrans. This MOU sets forth access criteria to be
used by the City and Caltrans in approving future development along Winchester Road and
State Route 79 South (SR79S).
It is a result of months of public workshops to solicit property owner input resulting in the
attached Planning Commission Recommendation, end Caltrans review end approval. Although
each highway is within the the boundaries of the City of Temecula, they are each ultimately
under the jurisdiction of the State of California Caltrans. City Staff has negotiated closer
access spacing in response to community input, as noted in the MOU, which is now
acceptable to both agencies.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None currently. Since it will be easier to site commercial development along each corridor
using the new criteria, sales tax revenue to City may be increased in the future.
ATTACHMENTS:
Memorandum of Understanding
Planning Commission Recommendation -
Minutes of September 19, 1995
ald~t~95~O523~ae-ndm,~u.w79
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
This Memorandum of Understanding is between the State of California, Department of Transportation
(herelnafter Caltrans) and the City of Temecula (hereinafter the City). This Memorandum of
Understanding (NIOU) constitutes solely a guide to the respective obligations, intentions and policies of
the City and Caltrans to use in approving new development along north and south State Route 79. This
MOU has not been designed to authorize funding for project effort, nor is it a legally binding contract.
It is the intent of this MOU to establish a mutual policy which will lead to a cooperative agreement
between Caltrans and the City within approximately twelve (12) months after the execution of this MOU.
The basic understanding is as follows:
NORTH ROUTE 79 0NINCHESTER ROAD)
Route 79 shall have up to three lanes for through traffic and up to two lanes for local circulation'.
Realignment my be necessary upon future development along Route 79. The City shall protect
the right-of-way for said realignment.
Ronte 79 is to have 114 mile intersection spacing with 118 mile spacing for limited access
driveways (i.e. right in, right out only) from 1-15 to Margarita Rd.
3. From Margarita Road to Murrieta Hot Springs Road the spacing shall be 1/4 mile intersections.
4. Intersection spacing beyond Murrieta Hot Springs Road will be 1/2 mile.
5. Approvals prior to the date of this MOU are excepted.
SOUTI{ROUTE79
Route 79 is to have 1/4 mile intersection spacing and 1/8 mile limited access driveway spacing
from 1-15 to Ann Road.
2. Approvals prior to the date of this MOU are excepted.
APPLIES TO NORTH & SOUTH ROUTE 79
Intersection and limited access design shall be developed in accordance with policies, procedures,
practices and standards normally followed by Caltrans and the City.
Eventual realignment of Route 79 may be necessary due to development along current Route 79.
Should a new alignment of Highway 79 be mutually agreed upon by the City and Caltrans, the
City shall cooperate with Caltrans to the greatest extent practicable to provide CalWans future
right-of-way protection for Route 79 realignment through negotiations.
I Concur:
ROBERT W. SASSAMAN, Acting District Director
District 8
JEFFREY E. STONE, Mayor
City of Temecula
Date
Date
Attachment A
!
· !
rv
Attachment B
I.D,
S.R. 79 (North)/Winchester Road Access Recommendations
State Rome 79 Access Study
Approx. Spacing in M~le~ Type of Access Permitted
Access Loca;tion
NB 1-15 Off*Ramp
1 SB Convenience Center Driveway
2 Ynez Rd.
tApprox. Spacin8 in Rm)/Essmide Waste•de Eastside Westside
- Right In Right In
North- South. and and Full Full
bound tmund Right Out Right Out Movement Movement
, , ~ ,
3 SB PM 23335 AccRs
3 NB Rag. Ctr. PhMe I Mirror Accees
...... '~"'~ Rag. Ctr. Phase I Main Access
mmee~weeeeeeeleee~
I
"" 5 Regiontl (~tr. S. Minor Access
I
II 7 I Regional Ctr. N. Minor Acce~._J
II
................... : ..................
I
............
9 SB I Winchester Meadows S. Minor
................... , ......
' ~ ' Rorzoau;n Rd.
11 NB Roripaugh Village Minor
!1 ...................;
I! ~ 2 NichOlas Re.
13 NB
o.oso(0.
Rancho Temecula Towne Ctr.
o.;11(0.
o.~1o(0.
0.293(0.472) , "'
, 0.455 [0.7331' ,
i --- {--
261 )
i
C.:e2(O.
I
i 13· i
I 7 I
/+ 10 ,,, ........... .""' ....
i51D. (0.i/~..);',...,:,...I.
i "
, , [] []
i79}.111 (0~~,~ ~;.~.:'.~;~ ~S~:,
I
,
! .. ,.~ .- .....~--~:-;.- >~ ~-~-...~--~ ,~ --:;,~,I ....- .........
177p.~ (0~,~
.~ ....~0 . . ....... . .. ~ ....
, ,
o.~ ~2(0. i80D.~
+----- 0 ...... . ....... ~ ........
,
- t t .. · .
~.~1(0..~79~.~!~79) · * ' ...": .'. '... ',~,";.: '.. ,
~ "t , r'-
. ,
~ 0.123 ~'2' ....., '., '
t ,- ' ' · -:: .....:- - " ~" '
0.246( O. ~03 ) '
~ ......... t ...............
s 0.123 (0~98) . . ~ ·
I ..............
. ,
~ ..................~ ................
Attachment B
S.R, 79 (North)/Winchester Road Access Recommendations (cont.)
13.1
State Route 79 Access Study
Approx. Spacing in Miles
(Approx, Spacing in F~-)Eastside
Right In
Access Location North- South- end
bound · bound Right Out
Rustic Glen Dr. IChao Driveway (Approx, SPacing in K_~)
14 NB Chao Access
..
I
I .................-' .............
t 15 I Winchester Creek Dr./%Nillows
I
16 Salk;n Ac:ess
16.1 SB
16.1 NB
Saikin Minor Access
Ceas Minor Access - CUP 914
[] -, Proposed Access (Change in 8/91 MOU}
· = Right In Only
17 Murrieta Hot Springs Rd.
(new alignment)
Legenc:
Type of Access Permitted
Westside Eastside Westside
Right In
and Full Full
Right Out Movement Movement
, m.j []
I '
o.12, ( o .~o4 >. ~"":"~';':"' ""' '; :."'.-i":':.."'.."iL ."" .............i .........' .............
I
, 0.332(0,535)rl ; '
I
Q.205 ( 0 J330 ) ~;i.~.~,~...~,; ,,:,,;.L~..,.'?..~,~' ...,,,:,:?~.,,~.,....l---.. .....
'f'" "?~ "i ' '
i .... ' I .... ' ....
' I ' []
! -----, t
, o.leo[9.290),.' ,
~ ...... ~.,
I I
! ..t
0.280(0.~."~1)0.~00(0.'16.~ ........i, .,,.
I I []
I [] 1
i -i
c.o99(0. ~59~o.o99 (o..~,59) ::,.. ,',
--4.--
I I
I I [] I
I
I I I
I I I
[] == Access Existing Or Consistent With 8/91 MOU
Attachment C
z
0
U
~J
0
U
Attachment D
I.D.
0
S.R. 79 {South) Access Recommendations
Access Location
NB I-15 Off-Ramp
State Rotrte 79 Access Study
Apl3rox. Spacing in Miles
(Approx. Epacing in KII;oumside
Right In
East- West- and
bound bound Right Out
0.134((}~21~0.134(0.'~1,6.~'..,,
Type of Access Perrob'ted
Northside
Right In
end
Right Out
.,t,
Sotfffisicle Nonhsicle
Full Full
Movement Movement
.[:: .... ..e_:.::! ............ .,
:; ,c :-_ , 'va:, Rancr. Ct' Ac:ess : []
o. , s( . !83) o.
..................................................... r
, o.; 20(0. t93) o.
........................................................................ r
, ~ c. ~ 2o(0. I93) o. ~ 2o (0. L93)
11 I Paloma De~ Sol Ctr. Dr. ~ ,__
0.133(0. 140,133(O..~b)4*':r,;.,-. t" 4' :
__._2. _ t, paz st. .:~G3) :.t~_}!"":"'; ....".' ., .. ......... ........1---- ..........
,. o. ~ sa(O.o. ~ 8stO.::.1 ........ [] []
' I ' · ! ............ F ',1
3 Waoash In. t []
o. ~ 94(0. 12) '::Y"}~'iT.
---- -----. .... f".
::. .-- .,-..-.:;',z-;:4..:;'-:;;:;:;'., ........
.,,=.... :.:E ...............: .....:: ....
~ece~la~ Sm,t~ Rc. !
o.T~ )
...................... j c. ~ ee (0. ) "' ' F ' '" ' --.~ -~-~
6 Constance A St. ~
' ' ' 0.~33(0. 9) ."~" ~'"': y, "', ' p' ';,,~,..~"~"
6.1 EB ' New S~uthsi~e Minor 0.271 (0.4~) ~ ~ -I '
C.;35(0. ~7) ' ~ ....... ~ .......... -F ., 'r., '.~
.~:,
.--, .,
i. ] .J ....
,
....... ..~
f --.-~-- ,
::...~f....~:_!...'i~:] ~.~o.~..,...,..,,~r' o.~,<o.~>a_~ ..........
,. i I c.: ,u. ~) t I-- ~-.-
; ........T~ .......l ~,a:o~s Pk,v.] : ', , I ~ ~ ~ 'l
>,.-,.L,--.F~.~:-.~-.u.,~L~'~-i ....~:;a~>o..,,<o. ~, = ":L-:.::::Zk:Z__LL___:
""";"'%" ........?""i~';""T;~ ....... ~ .............. I .........
E:'~E3'%;:'~;;z;T~'~r~ .....EZZ2~VZ2%'ZZZZ%2Z:ZZZ~:ZZ2' ..........
Attachment D
I.D,
S.R. 79 (South) Access Recommendations {cont.)
S.R. 79 South Access Study
Approx. Spacing in Miles Type of Access Permitted
,'Approx. Spacin8 in }~vJ~outhside i Northside Soutmicle Northsicle
' Right In i Right In
Access Location Eat- We~t- end ~ end Full Full
tmund bound Right Out I Right Out Movement Movement
1"!', Propa,,ed Access (Ch,,nge in 8/81 MOU) il ,- Acc~-~ Exi~in9 Or Con=i--tent With 8/81 MOU
13.1 EB FuT. Tract # 23172 Minor
13.2
Tract # 23172 Minor
B--,,'te.'f.,e-'C Stage Re.
14'. 1 WE PM 6428 Drwy. (C~mn. R. nch)
15 EB Temecula Creek Rd.
Legend:
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 19, 1994
A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Planning Commission was called to order on
Monday, September 19, 1994, 6:00 P.M., at the Rancho California Water District Board
Room, 42135 Winchester Road, Temecula, California. The meeting was called to order by
Chairman Steve Ford.
PRESENT: 3
ABSENT: 2
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
Slaven, Webster, Ford
Blair, Fahey
Also present were Planning Director Gary Thornhill, Assistant City Attorney Greg Diaz and
'Senior Planner Debbie Ubnos.ke.
PUBLIC COMMENT
None
COMMISSION BUSINESS
2. AoDroval of Aaenda
Chairman Ford recommended Items 1. and 3. be heard after the Public Hearing
Items.
It was moved by Commissioner Slaven, seconded by Commissioner Webster to re-
order agenda Items I and 3 to follow item Number 9 on the agenda.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 3
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 2
COMMISSIONERS: Slaven, Webster, Ford
COMMISSIONERS: ' None
COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Fahey
4. Director's Hearina Uodate
Report included in the agenda package.
Commissioner Fahey arrived at 6:10 P.M. and was no longer considered absent.
PP.,MINOgll 91i4 01128194
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
NON-PUBLIC HEARING ITEM~
SEPTEMBER 19, 1994
5. Memorandum of Understandina For Access Onto State Route 79
Principal Engineer Ray Casey presented the staff report.
Chairman Ford questioned why the staff is not making recommendations on
Highway 79 South, Tract 23299, and Paloma Del Sol project, prior to reviewing the
traffic study.
Engineer Casey said at this time staff can only support a right in at location 9 (EB)
and 10.1 of the staff report. However, staff has no opinion on whether it should be
a right-in only or a right-in and right-out.
Commissioner Fahey asked how the areas that have not been resolved are handled
with the approval of the MOU.
Engineer Casey said staff would like the Commission to provide direction to staff on
Items 9 EB and 10.1 . He explained the issue staff has concerning these two items
is local circulation and access to the Highway itself with respect to the commercial
center. Tract 23299 (9EB) or (County Glen Way), is proposed for a full turning
movement access with a traffic signal. Should that be approved, there may be
enough room for cars exiting the commercial center to get over to Margarita Road
and make a left turn or a U-turn, subject to further traffic analysis. He said without
that full turning movement access and the traffic signal, staff does not feel they can
support a right-inkight-out however, the property owner's Traffic Engineer has not
as yet provided staff with adequate analysis to support the right-in/right-outs. Staff
has the same concerns with the Paloma Del Sol project shown as 10.1 .
Commissioner Fahey said she feels comfortable allowing staff to make the
determination on these two issues prior to sending the MOU on to the City Council.
It was moved by Commissioner Fahey, seconded by Commissioner Siaven to
approve the Memorandum of Understanding with staff's clarification on Items 9 EB
and 10.1 prior to presenting the MOU to the City Council.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES:
4 COMMISSIONERS: Fahey,' Siaven, Webster, Ford
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: 1' COMMISSIONERS: Blair
R:::MINO9119/94 2 09128/94
ITEM 10
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY MANAGE~
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
May 23, 1995
Tree Trimming Program in Starlight Ridge Area
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council authorize staff to call for bids for Tree Trimming Program in the Starlight
Ridge Area.
BACKGROUND:
Staff has been requested by several residents to implement a Tree Trimming Program for the
above referenced area.
Review of the field condition indicated that trees in the area have not been trimmed for quite
some time and are preventing efficient trash collection and street sweeping. During the field
review, staff identified approximately 417 trees that should be trimmed.
Estimated cost for the program would be approximately 970,000.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Funds are available in the Public Works Routine Street Maintenance Account No. 100-164-
601-5402 for that purpose.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Tree Trimming List
-1- r.%egdq~S%O623%tmetdm. egNajl~
28860 Mira Loma
29800 Mira Loma
29770 Mira Loma
29650 Mira Loma
29590 Mira Loma
LOCATION
29870 Mira Loma
Mira Loma between Rancho Vista & CaRe Violeta south
side of street
30111 Casa Chata Pla~
30165 Casa Chata Place
30136 Casa Chata Place
30070 Calle Carranza
29585 Ca!le Violeta
Comer of Santa Cecilia & Mira Loma Dr.
30020 Santa Cecilia Dr.
30021 Santa Cecilia Dr.
30041 Santa Cecilia Dr.
30040 Santa Cecilia Dr.
30050 Santa Cecilia Dr.
30069 Santa Cecilia Dr.
30070 Santa Cecilia Dr.
30116 Santa Cecilia Dr.
30118 Santa Cecilia Dr.
30276 Santa Cecilia Dr.
30308 Santa Cecilia Dr.
30320 Santa Cecilia Dr.
30336 Santa Cecilia Dr.
30347 Santa Cecilia Dr.
30350 Santa Cecilia Dr.
30366 Santa Cecilia Dr.
CITY OF TEMECULA
PUBLIC WORKS
TREE TRIMMING
SCOPE OF WORK
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Trim (each side of enuane, e of
Ranthe Apartments)
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise'
Full Trim & Root Prune
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Trim
Trim
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
1
2
1
1
3
2
5
6
I
1
2
'1
4
2
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
-5
1
1
2
1
1
1
LOCATION
30388 Santa Cecilia Dr.
30381 Santa Cecilia Dr.
30138 Santa Cecilia Dr.
30277 Caprice Court
42624 Remora Street
42623 Remora Street
42611 Remora Street
Between EMWD Easement & Santa Cecilia Dr.
42500 Carino Place
30055 Levande Place
30071 Levande Place
30074 Levande Place
30319 Veradero Place
30333 Veradero Place
30341 Veradero Place
30396 Veradero Place
30788 Mira Loma Dr. (north o0
30648 Mira Loma Dr.
30360 Senela Place
30375 Senela Place
30383 Senela Place
30387 Senela Place
30378 Senela Place
30507 Moontide Court
30519 Moontide Court
30533 Moontide Court
30573 Moontide Court
30627 Moontide Court
~--, 30641 Moontide Court
- ~l" 30650 Moontide Court
'CITY OF ~
PUBLIC WORKS
TR!~ TRIMMING
SCOPE
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & ~
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & ]~nlse
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
OF WORK
QUANTITY
1
1
1
4
1
1
1
3
1'
3
1
2
.1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
-1
1
1
1
1
1
1
LOCATION
30644 Moonfide Court
30634 Moontide Court
30628 Moontide Court
30489 Spica Court
30503 Spica Court
30517 Spica Court
30529 Spica Court
30541 Spica Court
30528 Spica Court
30494 Spica Court
42468 Cosmic Dr.
42450 Cosmic Dr.
42430 Cosmic Dr.
42400 Cosmic Dr.
42385 Cosmic Dr.
42371 Cosmic Dr.
42367 Cosmic Dr.
42353 Cosmic Dr.
42339 Cosmic Dr.
Access From 42339 Cosmic Dr.
42327 CoSmic Dr.
42310 Cosmic Dr.
42285 Cosmic Dr.
42286 Cosmic Dr.
42275 Cosmic Dr.
Across From 42259 Cosmic Dr.
42245 Cosmic Dr.
42230 Cosmic Dr.
42214 Cosmic Dr.
42200 Cosmic Dr.
CITY OF TERF, CIF_,A
PUBLIC WORKS
Tlzl~ TRIMMING
SCOPE OF WORK
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2'
1
1
1
,1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
-1
1
1
1
1
1
42176 Cosmic Dr.
42201 Cosmic Dr.
42148 Cosmic Dr.
42120 Cosmic Dr.
42015 Cosmic Dr. (south of)
30304 Nebula Lane
30290 Nebula Lane
41909 Boreals Dr.
41910 Boreals Dr.
41893 Boreals Dr.
41884 Boreals Dr.
41883 Boreals Dr.
41864 Boreals Dr.
41869 Boreals Dr.
41850 Boreals Dr.
41855 Boreals Dr.
41828 Boreals Dr.
41837 Boreals Dr.
41806 Boreals Dr.
41819 Borales Dr.
41792 Boreals Dr.
41799 Boreals Dr.
41787 Boreals Dr.
41768 Boreals Dr.
41767 Boreals Dr.
41736 Boreals Dr.
41747 Boreals Dr.
41731 Boreals Dr.
30407 MHky Way Dr.
3o41o M ky Way Dr.
LOCATION
'CITY OF TEN~CIfLA
PUBLIC WORKS
TRRR TRIMMING
SCOPE OF WORK
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Ratso
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
QUANTITY
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1'
1
1
1
.1
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
1
1
1
-1
1
1
1
1
1
1
LOCATION
30424 Milky Way Dr.
3&.~.9 Milky Way Dr.
30454 lVIilky Way Dr.
30463 MHky Way Dr.
30468 MHky Way Dr.
30481 Milky Way Dr.
30484 Milky Way Dr.
30512 Milky Way Dr.
30526 Milky Way Dr.
30540 Milky Way Dr.
30~58 Milky Way Dr.
30~61 Milky Way Dr.
30~87 Milky Way Dr.
30631 Milky Way Dr.
30657 Milky Way Dr.
306~ Milky Way Dr.
30709 Milky Way Dr.
Morning Ridge Apartments
41899 Asteroid Way
41890 Asteroid Way
41883 Asteroid Way
41865 Asteroid Way
41841 Asteroid Way
41800 Asteroid Way
41801 Asteroid Way
41760 Asteroid Way
41755 Asteroid Way
41740 Asteroid Way
41739 Asteroid Way
41720 Asteroid Way
'CITY OF TEMF_CULA
PUBLIC WORKS
TI~EE TRIMMING
SCOPE OF WORK
Full Trim & Rai-~e
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & ]~nise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
1
1
1
2
2
1
1'
1
1
1
.1
1
1
12
10
1
1
1
1
1
-1
1
1
2
1
I '!
41711 Asteroid Way
42300 Agena St.
42288 Agena St.
42270 Agena St.
42258 Agena St.
42234 Agena St.
42220 Agena St.
42150 Agena St.
42144 Agenn St.
42130 Agena St.
42102 Agena St.
42103 Agena St.
42117 Agena St.
42131 Agena St.
42145 Agena St.
42159 Agena St.
42173 Agena St.
42189 Agena St.
42201 Agena St.
42215 Agena St.
42235 Agena St.
42249 Agena St.
42263 Agena St.
42293 Agena St.
42307 Agena St.
42321 Agena St.
42335 Agena St.
42351 Agena St.
42762 Agena St.
43071 Agena St.
LOCATION
CITY OF ~
PUBLIC WORKS
TI~-~- TRIMMING
SCOPE
FUll
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Trim &
Trim & Raise
Trim & Raise
Trim & Raise
Trim & Raise
Trim & Raise
Trim & Raise
Trim & Raise
Trim&Rais~
Trim & l~a_,se
Trim & P, aiss
Full Trim & Rrase
Full Trim & Rinse
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
6
OF WORK
QUANTITY
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
5
1'
2
1
1
.1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
-1
1
1
1
1
1
1
43061 Agena St.
42993 Agena St.
42994 Agena St.
425)80 Agena St.
425)68 Agena
425)63 Agena St.
425)54 Agena St.
425)28 Agena St.
428~0 Agena St.
42878 Agena St.
42864 Agena St.
42850 Agenn St.
LOCATION
42838 Agena St.
Across From 42838 Agena St.
42817 Agena St.
42741 Agena St.
42470 Ageha St.
42456 Agena St.
42440 Agena St.
42436 Agena St.
42384 Agena St.
42372 Agena St.
42360 Agena St.
42338 Agena St.
43020 Agena St.
42326 Agena St.
42365 Agena St.
42371 Agena St.
42385 Agena St.
424(D Agena St.
CITYOF~
PUBLIC WORKS
Ti~Eg TRIMMING
SCOPE OF WORK
Full Trim & lhi.~e
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & ]!ai-~e
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
QUANTITY
1
1
1
1
3
1
1'
1
2
1
I
1
-1
1
1
LOCATION
42445 Agena St.
42471 Agena St.
30681 Southern Cross Rd.
30682 Southern Cross Rd.
30666 Southern Cross Rd.
30656 Southern Cross Rd.
30764 Sky Terrace Dr.
30756 Sky Terrace Dr.
30750 Sky Terrace Dr.
30740 Sky Terrace Dr.
30676 Sky Terrace Dr.
30662 Sky Terrace Dr.
30665 Sky Terrace Dr.
30673 Sky Terrace Dr.
30679 Sky Terrace Dr.
30687 Sky Terrace Dr.
30695 Sky Terrace Dr.
30703 Sky Terrace Dr.
30747 Sky Terrace Dr.
30755 Sky Terrace Dr.
30961 Sky Terrace Dr.
30769 Sky Terrace Dr.
30410 Del Rey P,d.
40629 Carmilita Circle
40489 Carmilita Circle
28540 Felix Valdez Ave.
Northwest corner of Felix Valdez Ave. at
Baldary Circle
CITY OF TEMECULA
PUBLIC WORKS
TRER II~MMING
SCOPE
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
FUll Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & P, aise'
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & P, ase
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Ra:se
Full Trim & P, mse
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
Full Trim & Raise
OF WORK
QUANTITY
1
'2
3
3
1
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
.1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
t
2
1
3
LOCATION
Southeast corner Ynez Rd. at Calle Halcon
Northeast comer Avenida Barca at Margarita Rd.
30521 Iron Bark Court
28576 CabrHlo Avenue
30050 Cabrillo Avenue
30105 CabrHlo Avenue
30130 CabrHlo Avenue
Comer of Cabrillo Avenue and John Warher Road
30260 Cabrillo Avenue
30300 CabrHlo Avenue
South of 30395 Cabrfilo Avenue
North east comer of CabrHlo Avenue at Yorba Avenue
30433 Cabrillo Avenue
30465 Cabrillo Avenue
Across from 30520 Cabrillo Avenue
30650 Cabrillo Avenue
Across from 30650 Cabri!lo Avenue
Across from 30601 Cabrillo Avenue
30460 CabrHlo Avenue
44100 E. Vallejo Avenue
44181 E. Va!lejo Avenue
41900 Yorba Avenue
41770 John Warher Rd. (120 ft. east of Cabrillo Ave)
'CITY OF TEMECULA
PUBLIC WORKS
TIu~ TRIMMING
SCOPE OF WORK
Root Pnme Pine Tree where it is lifting
sidewalk
Trim over hanging branches for signal
Root Prune
Full Trim and Raise
Trim branches back away from edge of
pavement and Raise
Full Trim and Raise
Full Trim and Raise
Full Trim and Raise
Full Trim and Raise
Trim branches back away from edge of
pavement and Raise
Trim branches back away from edge of
pavement and Raise
Trim branches back away from edge of
pavement and Raise
Trim branches back away from edge of
pavement and Raise
Trim branches back away from edge of
pavement and Raise
Trim branches back away from edge of
pavement and Raise
Full Trim and Raise
Trim branches back away from edge of
pavement and Raise
Trim branches back away fzom edge of
pavement and Raise
Trim branches back away from edge of
pavement and Raise
Full Trim and Raise
Full Trim and Raise
Trim branches back away from edge of
pavement and Raise
Full Trim and Raise
5
8
1
1
1
3
3
15
6
6
4
1
8
4
9 r.~ma~nt~mmun~
LOCATION
28565 Vallejo Avenue
30151 Santiago Rd.
CITY OF TEMECULA
PUBLIC WORKS
TRI~-E TRIMMING
SCOPE OF WORK
Trim branches back away ~'om edge of
pavement and Raise
Full Trim and Raise
[QUANTrrY
5
TOTAL NUMBER OF TREES
417
ITEM
11
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL ~_
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICE
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
May 23, 1995
Release Traffic Signal Mitigation Bond in Tract No. 26861-3
PREPARED BY.~ Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council AUTHORIZE the release of Traffic Signal Mitigation Bond in Tract No.
26861-3, and DIRECT the City Clerk to so notify the Developer and Surety.
BACKGROUND:
On January 27, 1993, the City Council entered into subdivision agreements with:
The Presley Companies
15010 Avenue of Science, Suite 201
San Diego, CA 92128
for the improvement of private streets, installation of private water and sewer systems, and
payment of Traffic Signal Mitigation fees in Tract No. 26861-3. The bonds were posted by
The American Insurance Company as follows:
Bond No. 111 '3301 9460 in the amount of $70,500 for the improvement of private
streets and drainage.
Bond No. 111 3301 9478 in the amount of $37,500 for the improvement of private
water system
Bond No. 111 3301 9486 in the amount of $28,000 for the improvement of priva;ce
sewer system
Bond No's 111 3301 9460, 111 3301 9478, and 111 3301 9486 in the amounts of
$35,500, $19,000, and $14,000, respectively, for labor and material for private
streetsand drainage, and water and sewer systems.
Bond No. 111 2720 4896 in the amount of $6,150 to guarantee payment of traffic
signal mitigation fees.
I r:%agdrpt%95%O523~TR268613.Ten/ajp
Bond No. 111 2720 0472 in the amount of $660 for the placement of subdivision
monumentation.
The following item has been completed by the developer in accordance with the agreements:
Traffic Signal Mitigation fees within Tract No. 26861-3
Public Works Staff has confirmed that the subject fees have been paid by the developer. The
Public Works Department therefore recommends release of the Traffic Signal Mitigation Bond
as follows:
Bond No. 111 2720 4896 in the amount of $6,150.
The developer has not completed the contractual improvements at this time. Therefore, no
reduction or release of any other bonds is included in this action.
The affected streets are private streets and will not be accepted into the City maintained street
system. The private streets within this condominium subdivision are portions of "Chelsea
Way", "Briarwood Place", and "Arbor Lane".
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
Attachments:
Location Map
2 r:%agdrpt%95~O523%TR268613,tsm/ajp
TRACT NO. 26861-3
I,ocation Map
ITEM 12
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL ~
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFIC R
CITY MANAGE
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
May 23, 1995
"Stop" Controls on Milky Way Drive at Asteroid Way
PREPARED BY:
Martin C. Lauber, Traffic Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
The Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution
entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 95-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ESTABLISHING "STOP SIGNS"
BACKGROUND:
The Traffic Division was contacted regarding traffic safety in the Starlight Ridge neighborhood.
The major concern was that some intersections in the northeastern portion of Starlight Ridge
do not have intersection controls.
Most of the intersections without controls in Starlight Ridge are local street "T" intersections
with good visibility. At these intersections, motorists are required to yield to traffic if they are
approaching on the steam of the "T". Sections 21800 of the California Vehicle Code (CVC)
regulates the assignment of right-of-way (ROW) at all intersections including "T" intersections.
The intersection of Milky Way Drive and Asteroid Way currently forms a four (4) way
intersection without any assignment of ROW. The Caltrans Traffic Manual describes seven
(7) conditions which are used as guidelines for determining the possible need for stop and
yield controls.
Staff has reviewed all the conditions and found Number 5 to apply to Milky Way Drive when
approaching Asteroid Way. Condition Number 5 reads; On a minor street where the safe
approach speed to the intersection is less than ten (10) miles per hour. Due to roadway
geometrics and existing visibility, the safe approach speed was determined to be below ten
(10) miles per hour. Therefore, both staff and the Public/Traffic Safety Commission
recommend placing "Stop" signs with limit lines on Milky Way Drive at Asteroid Way.
-1-
FISCAL IMPACT:
2 "Stop" Signs with
Limit Lines at $150 each --
$300
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution 95-
2. Location Map
RESOLIYrION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA ESTABI.I.~HING "STOP~ SIGNS
The City Council of the City of Temecula does resolve, determine and order as follows:
Section 1. Pursuant to Section 10.12.100 of the Municipal Code, the following
'STOP* sign locations are hereby established in the City of Temecula.
A. Westbound Milk7 Way Drive O Asteroid Way
B. Eastbound Milky Way Drive O Asteroid Way
Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOFr!~, by the City Council of the City of Temecula
at a regular meeting held on the 23rd day of May, 1995.
Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor
ATTEST:
June S. Greek
City Clerk
[SEAL]
-3- r:~t~95XO523~m~Vem ~p~ajl,
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
crrY OF TBMEC'LmA )
I, lune S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that
Resolution No. 95- was duly and regnlnrly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 23rd day of May, 1995 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
CO~CILI~-~ERS:
CO~CILMBMBERS:
CO~CILMEMBERS:
CO~CILI~ERS:
L
H .J..,~ ON J
~-~ NO)frl4 ,t
3
~,
::)
7_ u
0
LO C,~T~O h4
ITEM 13
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL ~
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICE
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
May 23, 1995
Easement from Tomond Properties Limited for Maintenance of Loop
Detectors at Del Rio Road and Front Street
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council accept the easement from Tomond Properties Limited for the
maintenance of loop detectors at Del Rio Road and Front Street.
BACKGROUND:
During the installation of the traffic signal at Front Street and Del Rio Road, vehicle detector
loops were installed on private property to provide for vehicular access from that property into
the intersection.
At that time, no easement was acquired for the loops. Recent inspection of the signal
indicated that there is a need for maintenance in the area of the loops, to prevent damage to
these loops.
Staff requested that an easement be granted for that purpose. Attached document provides
for the required easement.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The cost associated with loop maintenance will be covered by the currently budgeted and
future funding for Street Maintenance, Account Number 100-164-601-5402. Solution to
current problem will not exceed ~500.00.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Tomond Properties, Limited Easement
2. Legal Description
3. Easement Plat
-1- r.%agebl~gS~O623~TOMOND.EASleJF
Cas;L-u..sCATE OF A~ANCB OF
(Governmere Code SeefloE 27211)
THIS IsTOCEkiu,~'thstllm immQ~in
nmlpmp~lran~lbyMumnmm
daad ~om Tomond Prot~ties, Limitsl
Io ~e CITY OF TEMECULA, is he~by
aceape~dfor~heimqmmofvest~g~
in ~hs C'a7 of Tsmmda on bealf of~he
b City Courtall purmmat W
No. 669. Ginross oomms to ~orda~n
th~reo~ by its duty authorized
Da~d: C'ay o~Temgula
By:
ICB 21775 E~. 9/30/97
ROAD NAME PROJECT NAME W.O.#
THIS INSTit~ IS FOR FOR !~Fr'OpnER*S USE REI'URN TO CrrY
TH~BEqE~TOPTH~ 'FEMECTJLAOFFECE
etl~lOP~AND 43174BmimaePerkDn
(GOV. CODE 6103)
TOMOND PROPR'RT~-q. T.TM1Tlk~
grant(s) to the City of Temecula an easement for the maintenance of Traffic Signal Bcluipment including
public utility and public services purposes, over, upon, across, and within the real property in the City of
Temecula, State of California, described as follows:
(Sce attached legal description)
Dated: MAY 4, 1995
President: JOHN C. RAYMONI) -
,$~"~ct,ul: THOMAS ~. TOMLINSON
LEGAL DESCRIFHON
That portion of Parcel 3, Parcel Map No. 21797 in the City of Temecula, as said parcel
is shown on the map, filed in Book 150 of Parcel Maps, Pages 99 and 100 thereof, records of
Riverside County, State of California and more particularly described as follows:
Beginning at the southwest comer of grid Parcel 3, said point being on the easterly line of 100
foot wide Front Street;
Thence, easterly along the southerly line of said Parcel 3, South 75° 31' 03" East, a distance
of 10.00 feet;
Thence, northerly, parallel with the easterly line of said Front Street, North 14° 28' 57" East,
a distance of 15.00 feet;
Thence, westerly parallel with the south line of said Parcel 3, North 75° 31' 03" West, a
distance of 10.00 feet, to a point on the easterly Line of Front Street (100 feet wide);
Thence, southerly along the easterly line of Front Street (100 feet wide), South 14° 28' 57"
West, 15.00 feet, to the Point of Beginning.
See F~rnent Plat attached hereto.
/
NOT TO SCAY~
CITY OF TEMECULA
· EASEMI~NT PLAT
BY: ~. uAO l~rc R
DATE: H-H-q5
FOR MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC SIGNAL EQUIPMF, NT
ITEM
14
APPROVAEy~
CITY ATTORN
FINANCE OFFICE
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
City Clerk
May 23, 1995
Resolution requesting Inland Empire Postmark Designation
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 95-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ADOPTING REQUESTING INLAND EMPIRE POSTMARK DESIGNATION
BACKGROUND: The Monday Morning Group located in Riverside has been working for
some time to effect a change in the postmark affixed to mail sent from Riverside. Currently
the postmark is 'San Bernardino'. The Monday Morning Group have requested the cities in
Riverside County to join in the effort' by way of adoption of a resolution supporting the
change.
ATTACHMENTS:
Resolution to be considered
February 16, 1995 Press Enterorise article.
RESOLUTION NO. 95-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA REQUESTING INI2kND EIVIPIRE
POSTIVIARK DESIGNATION
WIiI~EAS, the Inlnnd P-rllpire has, in the past decade and a half, been one of the fastest
growing regions in California and the United States.
WHEREAS, the Inland Enlpire is frequen~y and specifically referred to by television
and print media.
WHE!iR~kS, this media identification of the Inlnnd l~.mpire:has increased in frequency
to the point it has become the common designation for the region.
WHEREAS, the telephone book designation ~ is curren~y used by 100 businesses
and organizations and Inland I~.nlpire by 51 b-~nesses and organi~fions.
NOW lq:rF-RF~:ORB BE IT RESOLVED,
Section 1. That the City of Temecula respect~xlly requests the U.S. Postal Service
approve a postmark designation change from San Bemardino to Inland Em~pire for all mail which
is gencrated from the communities in Riverside County that make up the Inland Empire.
Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOFrED, this 23rd day of May, 1995.
ATTEST:
Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk, CMC
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA)
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of T~necula, hereby do certify that ~e
foregoing Resolution No. 95- was duly adopted at a r~gular meeting of the City Council of the
City of Temecula on the 9th day of May, 1995 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: 0
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 0
COUNCILIV[I~'IBER~: None
COUNCK,-MI~-MBERS: None
COUNCILMEMBERS: None
June S. Greek, City Clerk, CMC
eI ,
- 'g./i'd 8c~:p'l: ~E,, ii
ITEM 15
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPR~
CITY ATTORNEY '
FINANCE OFFICE
CITY MANAGER
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning ~'~
May 23, 1995
Planning Application No. PA94-0098, Nicolas Valley Special Study
Prepared By:
Craig D. Ruiz, Assistant Planner
RECOMMENDATION
Receive report and direct staff to 'prepare a General Plan
Amendment to remove Section IV(D), Special Study Overlay,
from the Land Use Element of the General Ran
BACKGROUND
When the City of Temecula adopted the General Plan, the Nicolas Valley area (see Attachment
No. 2) was given a land use designation of Very Low Residential, .2-.4 dwelling units per acre
(2 ~ acre lot size). However, prior to the adoption of the General Plan, some Nicolas Valley
residents expressed a desire to have an increased residential density. Thus, when the General
Plan was adopted, the area was designated as a Special Study Overlay. The overlay
designation was intended to allow staff, through the Special Study, to re-examine the carrying
capacity of land to determine what the appropriate residential density should be.
After preparing the preliminary analysis of the Study Area, staff and the City's consultant held
two workshops with the residents of the Valley. The first workshop was held in December
of 1994 with approximately 65 residents. Staff presented the preliminary opportunities and
constraints analysis, discussed the existing and proposed development for the surrounding
areas, and received input from the residents.' The second workshop was held in February of
1995 with approximately 35 residents. Staff provided preliminary information on costs for
various levels of street and drainage improvements and discussed various land use
alternatives.
On March 6, and April 3, 1995, the Study was presented to the Planning Commission. At the
conclusion of the April meeting, the Commission voted to recommend to the City Council that
no changes be made to the residential density within the Nicolas Valley Study Area.
DISCUSSION
As a result of the analysis performed by the City's consultant, it is staff's opinion that the
Nicolas Valley area 'could support an increase in land use intensity. The analysis concluded
that the primary land use constraints, specifically the lack of infrastructure in the area, could
be overcome through a variety of financing mechanisms.
While the Study concluded increased residential density was possible, the majority opinion of
the participants at the workshops, and those people who have called or written to staff, is to
leave the residential density unchanged. It is the desire of the majority of the residents that
the rural characteristics of the area be retained. Also, the significant costs to provide the
necessary infrastructure to support the increased density was not supported by the area
residents. By retaining the 2 ½ acre parcel requirements, the City of Temecula is better able
to meet the General Plan Goal of providing a diversity of housing opportunities that satisfy the
physical, social and economic needs of existing and future residents.
Based upon this input, it is the Commission and staff's recommendation that no changes be
made to the Very Low Residential Land Use Designation for the Nicolas Valley. Further,' the
Council should direct staff to prepare a General Plan Amendment to delete the Special Study
Overlay section {Land Use Element, Section IV(d)} of the General Plan.
FISCAL IMPACT
The fiscal impact will be limited to the staff time necessary to prepare the General Plan
Amendment.
Attachments:
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Study Area Map - page 3
Nicolas Valley Special Study - page 4
Planning Commission Staff Report, April 3, 1995 - page 5
Planning Commission Minutes, April 3, 1995 - page 6
Planning Commission Staff Report, March 6, 1995- page 7
Planning Commission Minutes, March 6, 1995 - page 8
R:~T.k~A94..CC 5116195 vl, w 2
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
STUDY AREA MAP
--NICOLAS -VAI ,T ,F,Y ....
SPECIAl- STUDY Ai~F,A BOUNDARY
,
A_re~ Indicate Study 'A.rea. BoUndary':
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
NICOLAS VALLEY SPECIAL STUDY
e-%,STApIrBpy'~IPAN.CC ~/16/9~ ~Te 4
NICOLAS VALLEY
SPECIAL STUDY OVERLAY
AREA ·
Draft Report
March 2, 1995
TABLE OF CONTENTS
II.
III.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................
INTRODUCTION
BACKGROUND
B.
C.
D.
E.
3
5
5
Location ......................................
· 5
Existing Setting .................................
Proposed Land Use ................. ". ............. 5
Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan ....................... 7
Area and Subarea Units ............................ 7
IV JURISDICTION .....................................
10
10
Existing and Proposed Circulation ....................
Existing and Proposed Parks and Open Space ............ 12
Existing and Proposed Public Facilities ................. 12
,
V. PHYSICAL ........................................
15
B.
C.
D.
Area 1 ...................................... 15
Area 2 ...................................... 16
17
Area 3 ......................................
18
Area 4 ...; ...................................
VI. ENVIRONMENTAL ...................................
B.
C.
D.
20
20
Area I ......................................
Area 2 ...................................... 20
Area 3 ...................................... 21
Area 4 ...................................... 22
VII. LAND USE ALTERNATIVES ............................
23
23
Land Use Alternatives ............................
24
Preliminary Cost Evaluation ........................
VIII.
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION ...................
EXHIBITS
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Location Map ....................................... 6
Opportunity and Constraints - 1 ........................... 8
Opportunity and Constraints - 2 ................. ; ........ 11
Land Use Alternative A ................................ 27
Land Use Alternative B ................................ 28
Land Use Alternative C ................... : ............. 29+
Land Use Alternatives
TABLES
26
II.
INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this report is to evaluate the issues related TO the future
development of Nicolas Valley (herein referred To as the Study Area). The
Study Area is presently identified as a Special Study Overlay area in the
Temecula General Pin. Such a designation requires a comprehensive,
detailed evaluation of the area's development opportunities and constraints.
This evaluation will allow The City To further understand the issues that
effect the area such that appropriate decisions can be made to determine
the future use of the area and to recommend any changes to the General
Plan land uses. The General Plan contains the following list of issues to be
evaluated:
·
·
·
·
·
·
The provision of flood control, sewer, Water and other services; ,
Impact on surrounding development in terms of traffic, light, noise,'
and other impacts;
Methods to provide a transition between rural and suburban/urban
development;
Topography and related visual impacts of development;
Existing lot patterns;
Traffic circulation and impacts of level of service;
Vegetation and wildlife resources;
The provision of recreation trails and open space linkages; and
Identify a strategy for financing and phasing of infrastructure and
other public improvements,
This report is divided-into five (5) distinct subjects that will outline the
approach utilized to evaluate the issues listed above. The five (5) subjects
include:
III.
Reckqround: This Section is intended to provide the reader with an
ove.rview of the Study Area and will act as a framework for
understanding the issues which affect the Study Area.
IV.
Jurisdictionel: This Section will identify the various governmental
regulations and proposed projects which affect the use and
development of the Study Area. The issues to be discussed include
the General Plan Land Use and Circulation, zoning, park and open
space areas, bicycle trails, schools and other public facilities.
Phvsicah The information in this Section focuses upon the landforms
and infrastructure facilities which exist or are proposed, This Section
is to be separated into four (4) geographic areas in an effort to group
common or like areas together which can then be evaluated based
upon a fixed set of issues, This process will occur by comparing the
effect of the existing or proposed facilities upon the Study Area's
physical environment and rati_.ng it as either low, moderate or high in
3
VI.
VII.
VIII.
sensitivity. The definition of these sensitivity measures are noted in
Section III Background. The issues To be discussed in this Section
include the Study Area's geography, slopes, landform, parcelization
pattern, and road system.
Fnvironment~h This Section contains information related to biological
and drainage issues which constrain the use of the land. The issues
to be discussed include native plant communities, animal habitat and
drainage courses. The evaluation criteria will be the same as that
noted in Section V Physical.
l,~nd Use Alternatives: This Section evaluates potential land use
intensities for various portions of the Study Area and estimates a cost
distribution for road and drainage facilities. The purpose of this.
section is to understand the financial implications of selecting'
different development options for the Study' Area.
Concltssion and Recommendation: This Section contains a brief
summary of the issues presented previously and provides the City
with a specific recommendation.
4
III. BACKGROUND
A. Location
The Nicolas Valley Study Area contains approximately 680 acres and
is located in the northeast comer of the City. The Study Area is
irregular in shape since it is an outgrowth of adjoining development
petterns created by either existing or proposed development. Project
boundaries include Butterfield Stage Road on the east and proposed
Leon Road along a pertion of the westerly boundary. The northern
boundary of the Study Area abuts the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan.
The Study Area is bisected by Nicolas Road which runs generally in
an east/west direction. (See Exhibit 1:)
Existing Setting :
The STudy Area is bordered by hills To the north and south and
traversed by several drainage courses which merge near Nicolas
Road, 'just east of proposed Leon Road. Nicolas Road is fully
improved from approximately Winchester Road To proposed Leon
Road where it narrows to a two (2) lane paved road between Leon
Road and Calle Girasol. Nicolas Road easterly of Calle Girasol is a
two (2) lane graded dirt roadway. Butterfield Stage Road and Calle
Medusa are also graded dirt roads within the Study Area. The Study
Area Can be characterized as rural in nature based upon the existence
of large lots, horse corrals, dirt or graded dirt streets, and the lack of
public improvements.
C. Proposed Land Use
St, ,dy Area: The Study Area is currently designated VL (Very
Low, .2 to .4 dwelling units per acre) on the City General Plan
Land Use Map. It is also a Special Study Overlay area, as
noted in the General Plan text.
The property is zoned R-R-1 and 2½ (Rural Residential, I and
2½ acre minimum lot sizes); R-1-1 (One Family Dwellings, 1
acre minimum lot size); and R-A-2½ (Residential Agricuitur. e,
2½ acre minimum lot size.)
Adjpcent I ands: The Study Area borders a variety of General
Plan Land Use designations: RH (Hillside, 0 to .1 dwelling
units per acre); L (Low, .5 to 2 dwelling units per acre); LM
(Low Medium, 3 to 6 dwelling units per acre); and OS (Open
Space).
5
·-NICOLAS -VA Y ,I ,l~,y ....
SPECIAl- S'I'~DY AREA BOUNDARY
Adjacent City zoning is R-A-5 (Residential-Agriculture, 5 acre
minimum lot size); R-1 (One Family Dwellings), R-T
(Mobilehome Subdivision and Mobilehome Park); and the
Roripaugh 800 Specific Plan.
Roripaugh inch Specific Plan
The I~ripaugh Specffic Plan is approximately 790 acres in size and
is proposed to contain 2,370 units. It includes 160 acres within the
City limits with the balance in the unincorporated County area..The
project is proposed to improve Butterfield Stage Road to an Urban
Arterial (134 foot right-of-way) or Arterial Highway (110 foot right-of-
way) depending upon its location. Several Secondary Streets (88
foot right-of-way) and a Principal Collector (78 foot right-of-way) are
proposed within the project and will intersect with Butterfield Stage
Road ad|acent the Study Area boundary.
The land uses proposed within the Specific Plan adjacent to the
easterly end of the Study Area include commercial, residential, park,
middle school, and open space. The northern portion is proposed for
commercial and residential uses, although both are to be separated
from the Study Area by an open space buffer.
Area and Subarea UnITs
Research within the Study Area has been divided into a series of
geographical areas. Sections V and VI of this report contain a
discussion of the physical and environmental issues associated with
four (4) distinct areas (See Exhibit 2). Each area boundary was
formed based upon a significant identifiable feature, such as the hills
or the location of the flood plain. Section VII contains land use
alternatives which further divide the Study Area into smaller
subareas. These subareas reflect potential development areas or
units. Due To the separate function of each area and subarM
analysis,-the boundaries of each are not intended to be coterminous.
The overall objective of dividing the Study Area into smaller
components is an attempt to more easily define the relevant issues
which affect the Study Area and weigh their level of importance.;
The evaluation criteria for the physical and environmental issues
contained in the four (4) major geographical areas are based upon the
following scale:
7
/
/
/-
/
-/
11 ·
iow Sensitiviw: An issue affac~s either a minimal amount of
land or is not significant with respec~ to maintaining the
integrity or composition of a facility/or resource.
Medi,jm Sensitivity: An issue effects either a sizeable area of
land or could adversely effect the integrity or composition of
a facility or resource.
High Sensitivity: An issue will effect a significant amount of
land or will adversely effect the integrity or composition of a
facility or resource.
9
IV.
JURISDICTIONAL
A number of issues affect the Study Area which are either regulated by the
City of Ternecula or maintained by other local agencies. Although these
regulations maybe unseen by a member of the public, they have a
significant effect upon the potential use of property.
A. Existing and PropoSed Circulation
The Study Area is currently traversed by the following identifiable
roadways:
O
·
O
O
O
O
O
·
Nicolas Road - 2-lane graded dirt road
Butterfield Stage Road - Graded dirt road
Calla Medusa - 2-lane paved road :
Calla Girasol - Graded dirt/paved road'
Walcott Road - 2-lane graded dirt road
Calle Chapos - Graded dirt road
Riverton Lane- 2-lane paved road
Liefar Road - 2-lane graded dirt road
A number of addition streets are noted on Assessor's Map pages but
not recognizable in the field. These streets provide access to
individual parcels within the Study Area. Although some of these
streets are dedicated to the City the balance are private roads and are
identified as a lettered lot on the County Assessor maps. The private
roads have been offered for dedication but not accepted by the City
for maintenance.
Various circulation improvements are identified for the Study Area
and contained in the City General Plan Circulation Element. These
circulation improvements include the following (See Exhibit 3):
Butterfield Staae Road: This roadway is to be a 6-lane Urban
Arterial (134 foot right-of-way).' The westerly one-half of
Butterfield Stage Road, south of Calle Chapos, has been
dedicated to the City at a half-width right-of-way of 55 feet.
Additional dedication of land will be required to meet tkie
General Plan requirement.
Nicelee Ro,,d: This roadway is to be a d-lane Arterial Highway
(110 foot right-of-way) with a raised landscape median.
Within the street right-of-way is to be included a Class II or III
bicycle lane. Nicelee Road, east of proposed Leon Road, is
primarily a non-dedicated roadway. The balance of the
roadway is noted as a separate lettered lot on the County
10
Assessor maps and has been offered for dedication to the City
but not accepted for maintenance.
leon Rned: This roadway is proposed to be · Secondary
Highway (88 foot right-of-way). No portion of this roadway
has been dedicated to the City at this time.
cell. ~iresolleelle Chenos/Welcott I erie: These streets have
been identified on the City General Plan Circulation Element as
a 2-lane Principal Collector (78 foot right-of-way). In *the
Spring of 1995, the City intends to construct road
improvements on these streets to provide for two (2) lanes of
traffic within 32 feet of paving. The improvements will extend
from La Serene Way to Nicolas Road.
Ricvcle Facilities: In addition to the 'bicycle lane described
above, a Class I bicycle lane is also proposed north of Nicolas
Road. This facility would be separate from Nicolas Road and
located outside of the street right-of-way.
Existing and Proposed Parks and Open Space
No parks or open space areas exist or are proposed within the Study
Area. However, existing Riverton Park and a number of proposed
parks and open space areas are planned in the areas immediately
beyond the Study Area boundary. The park and open space areas
noted on the City's General Plan north of the Study Area overlap
those planned for the Roripaugh Specific Plan. The drainage courses
in the Roripaugh Specific Plan, which ultimately extend into the Study
Area, have been identified as open space with the intent of
preserving their drainage and biological characteristics.
The City collects park' development fees for the purpose of
developing new parks or rehabilitating existing ones. Although no
parks are proposed in the Study Area, development fees provide a
mechanism for new development in the Study Area to pay their
proportional share of new park facilities.
Existing end Proposed Public Facilities
No schools exist or are proposed within the Study Area. However,
one elementary school exists to the northwest of the Study Area and
several schools are proposed within the Roripaugh Ranch Specific
Plan. The Roripaugh Plan includes both a K-8th grade school and a
middle school. As was noted above for park facilities, each new
development is assessed school fees for the purpose of paying their
proportional share of new sch=ool facilities. These facilities may be
12
located beyond the immediate geographic area of individual
development projects.
A number of infrastructure improvements are proposed and include
the following:
Flectrical: A 115 volt electrical line is proposed along the
westerly edge of the Study Area.
Fxisting Sewer: No sewer lines exist within the Study Area.
Prooosed SeWer: Two (2) sewer lines are proposed through
the Study Area~
e
e
An 18-inch line is proposed along the southerly side of
Nicolas Road extending easterly through the Study Area,
to Calla Girasol. At this point the line size decreases to
15-inches and continues easterly through the Study
Area into the Roripaugh Specific Plan.
A 12-inch line is proposed to branch off of the 18-inch
line (described above) just easterly of the intersection of
Nicolas Road and Calla Girasol. The 12-inch line will run
parallel with Calla Girasol until it intersects with Calla
Chapos, where it will extend easterly until it terminates
at the intersection of Calle Chapos and Walcott Road.
FXiSting Water: A water well owned and operated by the
Rancho California Water District exists just north of the
intersection of Nicolas Road and Calle Girasol. Water lines
exist in the .following locations:
e
e
e
-e
An 8-inch line in Liefar Road.
An 8-inch line along the north side of. Nicolas Road
extending from the San Diego Aqueduct westerly to a
point just west of the intersection section of Calla
Girasol and Nicolas Road. This line intersects with the
Liefar Road line·
An 8-inch line extending southerly and easterly from tl~e
8-inch line in Nicolas Road along the east side of Calle
Girasol and the north side of Calla Chapos to a point just
east of the intersection of Walcott Road and Calla
Chapos.
A .12-inch line in Calle Medusa, which extends south of
its intersection with the extension Nicolas Road. This
line connects to the 8-inch line in Liefer Road.
13
PrODOSed Weter: A number of water lines are proposed in the
Study Area. A 48-inch line is proposed through the length of
the Study Area along the southerly side of Nicolas Road.
Intersecting this line just east of Butterfield Stage Road, is-a
proposed 16-inch line extending north and south of Nicolas
Road. An additional 30-inch water line is proposed to connect
to the existing 8-inch line which parallels Calle Girasol and
Calle Chapos. The line will run south along Walcott road and
north along the San Diego Aqueduct.
14
PHYSICAL
The Study Area has been divided into four (4) primary areas for purposes of
evaluating specific *site issues. The boundaries of each area were
determined by establishing a geographic boundary which reflected similar
land uses, geography, drainage features or other significant environmental
characteristics.
Area 1
~eonrAnhy
Area I is in the Southwest Quadrant of the Study Area and is
primarily characterized as hillside area. This Area is geographically
homogeneous due to the ridgeline which forms a spine and traverse'
the property from the east to west.
Slones
Slopes in the area are averaging approximately 17 percent and range
between 5 percent and 30 percent. This area borders the flood plain
created through the convergence of the many drainage courses which
enter the Study Area from the east.
Perceli~mtion Pettern
The parcelization pattern is fairly uniform with respect to size
throughout the area although some parcel configurations have narrow
widths when compared to their depth.
RoAd Svstem
This area includes only a portion of Nicolas Road and Calle Medusa.
Only a small portion of these roads are improved. Nicolas Road is the
only General Plan Circulation roadway within the area.
t Andform
The most significant. physical feature is the gently sloping ridge which
generally divides the area in half from east to west. The high points
which create the ridge characteristics are not significant within the
context of the topographic configuration of the entire Study Area.
However, the ridge does help to divert some local drainage around
the Study Area to avoid further impacting the Study Area's drainage
problems.
Sensitivity MeAsure
Due to the moderate scale of the araa's topography and the fact it
could have soma effect upon the developmant of the area, the
physical issues in this area would rate as moderate on the sensitivity
scale.
Area 2
tl-eogrAnhv
The boundaries of this area were derived from the configuration of
the Valley floor, which is primarily eftacted by the storm water
drainage course which traverses the Study Area generally along the ..
alignmant of Nicolas Road, This floodplain is probably the most'
significant and defining feature .within the entire Study Area. The
floodplain boundary is also the location of numerous master planned
physical improvements identified in Section II Background, including
Nicolas Road, portions of Leon Road and Butterfield Stage Road, a
Class I bicycle lane and proposed water and sewer lines.
Slones/I Andform
The combination of the proposed improvements discussed above are
reflective of the physical characteristics embodied in the fact this area
is a floodplain and relatively flat. As a low-lying area it is subject to
receiving stormwater run-off from tributary areas. In addition, a low
point is the logical location for the placement of facilities, such as
sewer lines, which are designed based upon achieving a gravity. flow.
The location of the road also reflects the path of least resistance to
traverse for man and vehicles.
PArcelization Pattern'
The subdivision pattern abutting Nicolas Road reflects an intent to
use the street as the primary access for existing parcels, The
planned road improvements and the installation of a bicycle lane
could significantly affect the use of these properties, In addition, th~
intent of designating Nicolas Road a 4-lane Arterial Highway is to
provide a major east-west circulation link designed to carry a
significant number of vehicles through this portion of the City.
Allowing individual lots to maintain access to Nicolas Road would
severely hamper its effectiveness to achieve this goal..
Road System
Nicolas Road is the primary roadway within the Study Area and acts
as a spine from which other portions of the Study Area can be
accessed. Roadways within this area are primarily graded dirt roads.
Proposed master planned streetS in the area include Nicolas Road, a
small portion of Calle Girasol branching south of Nicolas Road and a
portion of Butterfield Stage Road which abuts the Study Area
boundary.
· -~ensitivitv Mees-re
Due to the significant effect of the proposed improvements upon The
areas existing subdivision pattern and storm water drainage courses,
the existing physical issues in this area would rate high on the'
sensitivity scale.
Area 3
~eorirenhv
Area 3 consists of the most northerly portion of the Study Area and
abuts the Roripaugh Specific Plan to the norfh and east. This area
also contains the greatest amount of development within the Study
Area.
SIODeSll endform
The topographic configuration of this area consists of an irregular
sloping terrain which descends to the south. Slopes within the area
range between 10 and 15 percent. Isolated high points exist but are
not significant in 'respect to the amount of land they encompass or
thei~ height. The subdivision pattern has attempted to make the
greatest use of these high points by subdividing around them and
incorporating them into. individual lots.
PerceliTetion Pettern
The' subdivision pattern within this area is uniformly irregular except
for some of the parcels located north of Liefer Road. Some of the
parcels in this area do not have access to a public street. This may
not be a significant concern, however, since private streets, denoted
as a lettered lot on the County Assessor maps, have been approved
securing them access to public streets.
De
Road Svstem
Liefer Road is the only existing public street in the area.
Development within the area must obtain access from Liefar Road.
Sensitivity Measure
The topographic configuration in this area is not as dramatic as that
contained within Area 4. As such, the hillside area is more suited to
development than .Are 4. Slopes within'this area are moderately
steep. However, they do not prohibit development, as evidenced by
the current number of homes. No other significant physical issues
exist which constrain development, such as-a drainage course or
flood plain. Due to these factors the effect of existing physical issues
in this area would rate as moderate on the sensitivity scale.
Area 4
r-eOgr-Ohv/SlOoeS
Area 4 is located in the southeasterly portion of the Study Area. This
area offers the greatest topographic variety within the' Study Area
since it does include a relatively flat portion of land north of Calle
Chapos which transitions into moderately step terrain as one
progresses south.
I andforms
Within the overell setting of the Study Area the low lying area north
of Calle Chapos represents a Terrace or bench which sits above the
actual floodplain area (Subarea 2). The high points within this area
represent the highest elevations within the entire Study Area.
P-rceliTAtion Pattern
This area contains the' most irregular shaped parcels within the Study
Area. The number of "flag lots" are reflective of the area's terrain.
Road System
This area is traversed by a number of existing roadways. Several
master planned streets are also planned in the area including
Butterfield Stage Road and Call. Girasol!Calle Chapos/Walcott Lane
which are grouped in the City General Plan as a Principle Collector
Street and therefore would be the same width. Road improvements
within this area would be expensive due to the existing Topography.
Existing drainage courses which Traverse the roadways will also
18
require improvement. The combination of Calle Girasol/Calle
Chapos/Walcott Lane is to be improved to an interim condition
consisting .of a 2-lane 'roadway within 32 feet of paving.
Construction is schedule to start in the Spring of 1995.
Sensitivity Measure
This area represents the greatest change in topographic elevation in
the Study Area. The level-of improvements necessary for both
existing and proposed roads are also probably the most extensive,
based upon the length of the roadways. Due to these factors the
physical issues affecting development in this area would be rated as
high on the sensitivity scale.
VI. ENVIRONMENTAL
The previous section identified physical issues related to each primary
geographic area of the Study Area. The purpose of this section is to focus
upon and identify those environmantel issues which are significant within
each Subarea,
A. Area I
r-nnerel CharActer
This area is the entry point tO the Study Area and was formed as a
remainder area created by the residential development to the
southeast, the floodplain to the north and the project boundary to the.
south. As such, the predominate feature of. this area is the sloping
hillside ridge which slices through the area.*
Riological Resources
The most significant environmental component of this area is the
location of a small Coastal Sage-Scrub community located just to the
west of Calle Medusa. It is unknown at this time whether any
threatened or endangered species exist in this area.
nreina(~e Characteristics
As noted in the previous discussion on physical issues, the
topographic configuration of the hillsides helps to divert drainage
around the Study Area. This drainage course is only partially within
the Study Area and does not possess significant environmental
attributes.
Sensitivity Measure
Due to the isolated location of the Coastal Sage-Scrub, the relatively
minimal site area it effects, and the lack of other environmental
factors, the environmental issues within this area Would rate low on
the sensitivity scale,
B. Area 2
~eneml Character
The southerly boundary of this area generally borders the floodplain
while the northerly portion primarily reflects a transition in grade
(grade break) from the flat valley floor to the sloping hillsides.
Biological Reso-rces/nrainage ChRrActeristics
The moat significant environmental feature of this area is the drainage
course-outlined by the flood plain boundary. The drainage course is
comprised of two (2) blue line streams which not only signify
significant drainage courses but also the potential existence of
various biological resources such as plants and trees or animals which
use the vegatation for habitat. It is unknown at this time whether
any threatened or endangered species exist in this Subarea.
.qensitivitv MeAsure
The moat significant environmental factor within the Study Area is
the flood plain and its associated environmental attributes, which can;
act as a life source,for plants and a resulting habitat for animals. In
addition, the floodplain represents both a significant danger to
development and a significant cost tO overcome. Due to these
environmental factors, the environmental issues within this area
would rate high on the sensitivity scale.
Are 3 ~
Reneral Ch;rActer
The easterly boundary of this area is formed by the City limits with
the northerly boundary abutting the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan.
The area contains a fairly irregular slope pattern.
Riolor)ical Resources
The moat significant environmental aspect of this area is the
extensive amount of land 'covered by Coastal Sage-Scrub which
occurs primarily within the north half of the area. In addition, the
Coaatal Sage-Scrub overlaps an area located at the northwest corner
of the area-that has been identified as having the potential for
paleontaological (pre-historic) resources. ..
nreineqe ChArecteristics
The topographic configuration of the area has created several notable
drainage courses' through the area. These drainage courses are not
identified as blue line streams on the U.S.G.S. map and therefore do
not .represent the same. level of stormwater run-off or potential
vegetation as other .drainage areas within Study Area.
21
Sensitiviw Measure
Due to the extensive existence of Coastal Sage-Scrub, the potential
existence of paleontological artifacta, and drainage concerns, the
environmental issues within this area would rate as moderate on the
sensitivity scale.
Area 4
r-ener-I character
This area is reflective of many features within the Study Area in that
it contains flat land as well as relatively steep slopes. Since Area 4
represents an area with both floodplain and hillside characteristics, it.
is appropriate that it contain attributes found in both.
Riologic-I Reso-rces
That.portion of the area south of Calle Chapos and primarily east of
Walcott Road contains a fairly large geographical area with Coastal
Sage-Scrub. It is unknown whether any threatened or endangered
species exist in this area,
Drainage CharaCteristics
That portion of the area north of Calle Chapos comains a blue line
stream which represents the drainage course which traverses the area
and connects-to the .defined floodplain along Nicolas Road to the
north. The blue line stream is parallel to or within the same alignment
as Calla Chapos.
SensitiVity Measure
The significance of drainage issues and the designation of blue line
streams have been previously noted. Due to these and the other
environmental factors. noted, the environmental issues within this
area would rate as high on the sensitivity scale.
VII. LAND USE ALTERNATIVES
For the purposes of evaluating land use intensities within the Study Area,
a series of 13 Subareas have been formed. Each Subarea is geographically
distinct due'to its unique characteristics, such as major roadways, parcel
configurations or/and .Study Area limitations.
To help understand the relationship between the previous four (4)
geographic areas rapresented in the opportunities and constraints analysis
and the new Subareas, please refer to the following comparison:
Opportunity and Constraint Areas
Area I
Area 2
Area 3
Area 4
Land Use Ntemative Subareas
I, J, and portions of F and G
H and portions of C, D, E, F and G
A, B and portions of D and E
K, L, M and a portion of J
The combination of various physical and environmental issues, including the
influence of potential development, warranted this reconfiguration and
further analysis of the study area.
A. Land Use Altamatives -
The approach to evaluating various land use intensities is based upon
the previously compietad opportunity and constraints analysis and a
further analysis of potential access alignments throughout the Study
Area. The delineation of each land use alternative is sensitive to the
issues raised in those previous sections.
Four (4) different residential' parcel sizes 'have been utilized in
developing each land use alternative starting with the existing zoning
of R-R 2 1/2 acre minimum, and transitioning to R-R I acre minimum,
R-R 1/2 acre minimum, and R-R 1/4 acre minimum lot sizes. Starting
with a existing base of 260 allowable units for the area (based upon
the existing zoning), Alternatives A,' B, and C would intensify the
total lot countto 742 lots, 9x-4- lots, and 1888 lots, respectively (see
Table I and Exhibits 4, 5 and 6). The three alternative land use
intensities were chosen in order to generate varying unit counts
within the Study Area: The goal of generating these 'alternative
intensities is to establish a method of distributing the cost of road
and storm drain improvements for the Study Area among the existing
and/or future residents and .to identify those dollar values:
As part ofthis analysis existing and future improvement programs for
the Study Area were also evaluated. This includes the future
disposition of the Roripaugh Specific Plan, which boarders Nicolas
Valley to the north and east, as well as the character of the existing
surrounding land uses.
Preliminary Cost Evaluation '-
NBS/Lowry approached the cost analysis as a preliminary means of
evaluating the relative costs of required infrastructure. The major
infrastructure elements considered in the cost analysis included the
major roads and drainage facilities required by the City of Temecula
General Plan and necessary to provide for the health, safety and
welfare of the local community. The roads included a half section of ..
Nicolas Road, a half section of Butterfield Stage Road, a half section'
of Leon Road, and a full section of Liefar Road.
The drainage improvereacts included in the analysis were the (3)
three blue line streams which traverse the property from east to
west, as well as a half portion of the bridge necessary for a crossing
near the intersection of Nicolas Road and Calle Girasol. Three (3)
different types of channels were considered for evaluation; 'a
naturalized channel, a dirt sided trapezoidal channel, and a concrete
sided trapezoidal channel. Each type of channel has significant cost
and land area implications. The principle difference in design is
between the trapezoidal channel and the naturalized channel.
Examples of the designs-are evident in both the Study Area and
adjoining properties. The Study Area has an improved concretelriprap
sided trapezoidal channel along the north side of Nicolas Road at the
southwesterly entrance to the Study Area. The proposed Roripaugh
Specific Plan, located easterly and upstream of the Study Area,
proposes the use of naturalized channels for each of the existing blue
line streams.
The Temecula General Plan also included a Class I bicycle trail along
the north side of Nicolas Road which could be aligned with the
existing drainage course or proposed drainage facilities. Due to the
potential dual functions of these 'channels it Was deemed appropriatb
to include more Than one type of channel improvement cost.
24
The relative costs of these improvements and their associated cost
allocation would range as follows:'
IIm ·
Roadway costs would generally vary between 6300.00 and
$800.00 per unit per annualized assessment.
Drainage costs would generally vary between $100.00 and
~1,300.00 per acre .per annualized assessment depending
upon the type of channel design selected.
Thee costs are preliminary in nature and are only intended to identify
potential improvement costs such that property owners and decision-
makers will have a general understanding of the implications of
different land use decisions. These ;do not represent preliminary
engineering studies for assessment district purposes.
NICOLAS VALLEY
LAND USE ALTERNATIVE LEGENDS
88.0 2 I j2
36.0 1.0 36
30.0 1/2
21.0 1/2 42
72.0 1]'2 144
40.0 1/2
16.0 1/2 32
80.0 1/'2 160
79.0 1.0 79
20.0 2 1/2 8
55.0 2 1/2 32
78.0 2 1/2 31
34.0 2 1/2 13
~9.0 ~2
ALTI~RNATIVE
I A~-, ~ n~ty n.u.', II~ ~
A ~0 L0 ~ A ~0
B ~0 ~ ~ B ~0
C ~0 ~ ~ C ~
D 21.0 1~ ~ D 21.0
~ ~0 ~ 1~ E ~0
F ~ ~ ~ F ~0
G 1~0 la ~ O 1~
H ~ ~ 1~ H ~0
J 2~0 1~ ~ J ~.0
K ~.0 1.0 ~ ~ ~.0
L 7&0 1.0 ~ L ~0
M ~.0 1~ ~ M ~.0
i s s
TABLK I
VIII. CONCLUSION
The purpose of this study was to undertake an additional level of analysis,
beyond that recently completed for the new General Plan, to define the
area's future land use. The current General Plan Land Use designation for
the Study Area is VL (Very Low Density, .2 to .4 units per acre). A variety
of goals, objectives, and policies am contained in the City's General Plan
which currently have an affect upon the use of land within the Study Area.
Howaver, the City felt the unique attributes of the Study Area warranted
further analysis prior to assigning a mere appropriate land use designation.
The Study Area is affected by a broad range of issues due to its location,
current use, and adjacent uses. The documentation contained in the
previous sections has identified those issues in an effort to gain a greater
understanding of the area. Although some :potentially significant'
environmental issues exist, such as drainage and topography, they do not
represent constraints severe enough to restrain development to a level less
than the adjoining residential areas.
In addition, several workshops have been held with area residents to obtain
their input on the potential use of the area. The majority of residents in
attendance st the meetings expressed a desire that the level of development
allowed within the Study Area remain at or near the level currently
permitted.
The latter 'portion of the report contained development intensity and
improvement cost information in an effort to link the improvements required
by the General Plan and/or new development to the ability to pay for the
cost of construction. If the City is to further the circulation and associated
drainage improvements specified in the Temecula General Plan, a
proportional level of development will need to occur which can bear the
financial burden of paying for. the cost of construction. The cost will
generally lessen for more intensive development due to the ability to spread
the cost'over a greater number of people and/or the property owners will
realize a greater value and potential profit for their land.
Recommendation
Due to the intensification of the land surrounding the Study Area and the need to
maintain the goals, objectives and policies of City's General Plan, it is
recommended:
.1.
The Planning Commission recommend to the City Council that the Nicolas
Valley Study Area be allowed to intensify to permit lots 1/4 acre and larger,
consistent with Land Use Alternative C.
30
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
APRIL 3, 1995
R:*SSTAPPR.R'~MPAN.CC 5/16~ vie 5
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
MEMORANDUM
Planning Commission
Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning~''~''
March 6, 1995
Planning Application No. PA94-0098, The Nicolas Valley Special Study
Prepared by: Craig D. Ruiz, Assistant Planner
RECOMMENDATION: 1. Rr-P-OMMFND that the City Council Receive the Special'
Study Report and that no Change be Made to the Land
Use Designation within the Study Area
BACKGROUND
The Nicolas Valley is located in the northeasterly limits of the City. The area boundary is
roughly Joseph Road in the west, Butterfield Stage Road in the east, approximately 1000 feet
north of Liefer Road in the north and the northern edge of the Tierra Brisas and Pavilion Home
developments to the south.
The Nicolas Valley Study area consists primarily of 2 ½ acres parcels, consistent with the
zoning for the area. The Study Area is approximately 650 acres in size, with approximately
150 individual property owners and 240 individual parcels. Over the past few years, there has
been "typical" single family home development (one family homes, 7,200 square foot parcels)
to the West and South of' the study area. In addition, there is similar single family
development proposed for the areas to the North and East (Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan and
Johnson Ranch Specific Plan).
When the City of Temecula adopted the' General Plan, Nicolas Valley was given a land use
designation of Very Low Residential, .2-.4 dwelling units par acre. However, prior to the
adoption of the General Plan, some Nicolas Valley residents expressed a desire to have a
higher density land use designation for the area. Thus, when the General Plan was adopted,
the area was designated as a Special Study Overlay. The overlay designation was intended
to allow staff to re-examine the carrying capacity of land to determine what the appropriate
land use designation should be. Ultimately, the study was intended to provide a framework
for future development of the Valley. Should the study determine that an increased land use
intensity is appropriate, staff would then initiate a General Plan Amendment.
In March of 1994, the Planning Department issued five Requests-for-Proposal (RFP) to
planning firms in the Temecula area. In response, the City received three proposals. After a
preliminary screening of the proposals by staff, a consultant selection committee was
established. The committed was comprised of the Director of Public Works, Director of
Planning, and the Senior Planner. Base upon the committee's recommendation, the City
R:Wr;~Ii*AN.K:: 3/2/~ klb ' 1_ '
Council awarded a professional services contract to the consulting firm of NBS Lowry in
October of 1994.
DISCUSSION
In analyzing the carrying capacity of the Valley, the study area was divided into 4 major sub-
areas (See Attachment No. 2). Sub-areas were identified by way of major road divisions,
distinct topography, or parcel and study area limitations. The sub-areas were created to allow
a grouping of common areas together which can then be evaluated based upon a fixed set of
issues. The sub-areas are: Area I in the southwest quadrant of the study area; Area 2 is
located along the Valley floor; Area 3 is the northerly portion of the study area; and Area 4
is located in the southeasterly portion of the study area.
The first major task of the Study was for the consultant to develop the Opportunities and
Constraints Analysis {OCA). The OCA examines such issues as: land use density, traffic and:
road improvements, drainage improvements, sewer and water improvements, and the impacts'
of surrounding development. Each issue was evaluated to determine, as the name implies,
where development may or may not be suitable (See Attachment "4").
Once the OCA was complete, the next step was to develop land use alternatives. The
consultant and staff then developed four land use alternatives (See Attachment "4, Exhibit
2'). Alternative 'A" proposes ½ acre development along the valley floor and 2½ acre
development in the north and south hill side areas. This alternative would potentially allow
742 dwelling units. Alternative "B' would allow ½ acre development along the valley floor
and I acre development in the north and south hill side areas. This alternative would
potentially allow 944 dwelling units. Alternative "C" would allow ¼ acre development along
the valley floor and ½ acre development in the north and south hill side areas. This alternative
would potentially allow for 1888 dwelling units. Alternative "D' would be no change to the
existing land use designation.
In addition to the above tasks, a goal of the Study was to discuss what the residents of the
Valley envisioned for the future of this area. To this end, staff held two public workshops
with area residents. The first meeting was held in December of 1994 and was attended by
approximately 65 people. At this meeting, staff and the City's consultant presented the
preliminary opportunities and constraints analysis and discussed the existing and proposed
development for the surrounding areas. At the conclusion of the workshop, staff took an
informal poll of the meeting attendees to assess the residents views on future land use
designations. Staff determined that approximately 1/3 of the attendees wanted no change to
the land use designation, 1/3 would consider "some" increased land use designation and 113
were undecided, pending further information.
A second workshop was held in February of 1995 which was attended by approximately 35
people. The second meeting further discussed the opportunities and constraints of the area
and discussed various land use alternatives. In addition, staff provided preliminary information
on costs for various levels of street and drainage improvements. Specifically, rough cost
estimates were provided to construct half-street improvements to the circulation element roads
within the study area and for drainage improvements to Santa Gertrudis Creek. Staff stated
that if there were no increases in land use designations, or no funding mechanisms were
identified to provide the above improvements, the roads would continued to be unimproved
It:WrAPLeLsTWlPAN.PC 3/2/95 1~ 2 '
and the drainage problems would continue. At the conclusion of this meeting, the
overwhelming majority of attsndees were opposed to any increase in land use intensity.
As presented at the workshops, the OCA determined that even the most constrained areas,
the hillside portion of Areas 1,3 and 4, could absorb increased land use intensity. Typically,
parcels of a half-acre or greater do not require sewer improvements. Therefore, any land use
intensity greater than 2 dwelling units per acre would not require the installation of sewer
lines. As for street improvements, all subdivisions require half-section street improvements.
In addition, subdivisions of one-acre or less would require additional paved access to the
nearest publicly maintained street (Subdivision Ordinance No. 460). Finally, drainage
improvements would be dependant upon each developments impact and proximity to a
particular drainage course.
As an addition note, in 1994, the Department of Public Works conducted two mail surveys
of the residents in the area of Uefer Road. The purpose of the surveys were to determine if:
the residents of the area were interested in forming an assessment district for purpose of'
improving Uefer Road. The majority of the respondents indicated 'they did not wish to form
an assessment district.
CONCLUSION
The Special Study has determined that the Nicolas Valley could support an increase in land
use intensity. However, the anticipated cost associated with any increase in land use intensity
greater than one dwelling unit per acre would make such an increase cost prohibitive at this
time. Therefore, the alternative would be to allow for a density of one dwelling unit per acre.
In contrast, it is clearly the opinion of the majority of the Valley residents (those who have
contacted staff) that they do not support any increases in land use intensity. While this
opinion may represent a minority of the overall total number of land owners within the study
area, staff considers their input to be significant. Therefore, based upon the input of the area
residents, it is staff's recommendation that the Planning Commission recommend to the City
Council that the Very Low Residential Land Use Designation for the Nicolas Valley remain
unchanged.
Attachments:
2.
3.
4.
5.
Study Area Map - Blue Page 4
General Plan Land Use Designations of the Study Area - Blue Page 5
Draft Opportunities and Constraints Analysis - Blue Page 6
Letters Opposing Increases in Land Use Designation - Blue Page 7
Letters Supporting Increases in Land Use Designation - Blue Page 8
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
STUDY AREA MAP
·-NICOLAS -VA ~ ,LF, Y ....
SPECIAl, STUDY AREA BOUNI)AllY
:: i:
LIEFER RD
f'l
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATIONS OF THE STUDY AREA
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
DRAFT OPPORTUNITIES AND CONSTRAINTS ANALYSIS
R:~3TAFF!~gaPA94.PC 3~9~ ~
ATTACHMENT NO. 4
LETTERS OPPOSING INCREASE IN LAND USE DESIGNATION
RECEIVED
~ /
y-/
Craig Ruiz
Assistant Planner
Planning Department
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590-3606
February 23, 1995
RECEIVED
FEB 2 7 B95
Dear Mr. Ruiz:
As property owners at the far east end of Nicholas Road within'the
city of Temecula, we are writing to express our concerns with items
that the Planning Department is considering. We are vary ~,ch
against idea of rezoning the area for parcels smaller than two and
one-half (2 1/2) acres ~nd the idea of creating an assessment.
district to pay for improvements caused by the;rezoning.
My wifeand I, both born andraised in the Riverside/SanBernardino
area, purchased our property consisting of 3.79 acres in 1976 with
the intent of building a residence on it to retire to. Like us,
the people who own property on the east end of Nicholas Road are
either retiredpersons on fixed incomes or families trying to raise
children.
Along with all the fees inourredbybeing annexed into the city of
Temecula, imposing additional assessments on the property, whether
by the parcel or the acre, will either break the backs of these
owners or make it veryhard to find a buyer for the property if and
when they decide to sell.
To be honest with you, our bottom line is 1AAV~
CCsnfOvtAhlA W~h ~h~-2[W'4~th4~g~
Thank you for your consideration in this matter.
7020 Halesworth Court
Citrus Heights, CA 95610
(916) 725-6195
February 14, 1~5
TO:
FRO/~
Memb~,~foraRumlTemecula (CART)
5~44~ Pala V~ Drive
Tss,,~d~ C.A 92591
ATFENTION:
Chairnum Ford; Commi,sioners Blair, Fahey, Slaven and Webster
Ni~o~ v, dley specdal Study P, eo~u=,,ends,ion
I would like to thank you and the city staff fo~ undex~ng the extra effort of
orcheSrati~ the special study meetings for the residents d the Nicolss Valley Special
Study area. The information was enliXhteninz and valuable. The individuals from the
city staff were alwap profe~onal ana courte~ to what could be d~cn'bed ~ a
sometimes 'lively' crowd. This is exemplary city government, "of the people, for the
people and by the people". All involved should be commenck& I receommend that
no chan~ be mael- to the Current Nicohs Valley Ares Zoning.
The first study meetinS was attem~ !~y rouXhly 5006 of the property owners. Roughly
half were opposed to incre.ea zonin~ aen~y. The second meeting was attemie~ by
rouZhly 2096 of the plOp,C, ty owners. RouXhly 8096 were opposed to increased zozdnZ
density. A handful of residents were in. favor of dohlg 'something' and this floated
along the lines of improvements to drainage and cimzhtion, but not necessarily
I believe that there is an overall negative value-~dded associated with increa,~
population dendry in what is now predominately a 2 1/2 acre minimum parcel ares.
The followin~ are perceived to be the negatives associated with an increase in zoning
density and are contrary to the 'hiShe~ and best use' of the Nieolas Valley area:
,
Decreased quality d current rural lifestyle
In~mexi vehicular and pedestrian traffic
Increased local population density and crime
Negative impact for safe eque~;--htn usage
Further eradication of an unlisted enaan~red species:
The 'Rural Temecuhn Resiaenf
Nicolas Valley Special Study Recommendation PaSe 2
I can find no clear overridinZ positive aspects, (either financially, culturally or quality
of life enhancing) to the pi~possl to change the existing zoning.from R-R-2 1/2. I
located to Temecula, specifically in the Nicohs Valley area, to enjoy the riches of the
rural lifestyle. I do not desire, nor can I afford, the costs associated with
improvements, _-_-_-~-_-_-ments, etc. which are directly linked to increased density. In this
reSarcl I would be poorer in more ways than one.
I am not a developer, but am a homeowner residinz in the immediate neiZhborhoocis
of the Nicohs Valley Specisl Study and my lifestyles are directly impacted by the results
and recommendations that this process will produce. I intend to be represented when
the study recommendations are brought before the PhnninZ Commitsion and
subsequen~y the City Council. I would like this letter to'be plEed on record as beinS
in opposition to zonin8 density increases when the hearinS is conductecL
Additionally, I would like to extend my 8ratitude to the you and the commission
members for recognizing the residents who voiced their opposition to the Johnson
Ranch high density residential p~,posal. I believe that Temecula is fully capable of
becominz an attractive mix of rural residential units coupled with a balance of liZht
opportunity for prospc,-iLy, self-reliance and rural charisma second to none. It can
establish itself as a shining example for others on how to mature as a community
without the ills sffilisted with high density residential development which have
Please continue to maintain a cluestionh~ attitude regarding the merit of high density
residential growth Fx~ingd by land developers, especially in the Johnson and
Roripaugh projects which impact my immediate area. I am a member of a growing
population of local rural residents who stand in opposition to the intense residential
development of rural Temecula and its current spheres of influence. We are
collectively known as CaRT - C. adition for a Rural Temecula. Use my voice to
communicate to the representatives of these projects that we believe in adding greater
value to Temecula through less-dense, rural-residential development.
RECEIVED
FEB2 ? 1995
February 14, 1995
TO:
FROM:
The City of Temecula
Temecula Planning Commiuion
45174BuaineasParkDdve
Tcmecula, CA 92590
Mendzn, Coalition fora Rnral Temecula(CaRT)
39140 Pala Vista Drive
Temecu]a, CA 92591
ATTENTION:
stn3jK-r..
Ominnan Fo~-d; Comrais~ior~, Blair, Fahey, Slaven and Webst~
Nicx~ vaney Spe~ Study ~onune~
We would li~ ~ thank you andthe city staff for ~ the extra effort d
people". All involved should be connn~na~L We r~xnmnend i no chsn~ b~ made
dcnaity. A handful of residents were in favor of doing ' something and this fiea!~ along
We believe that there is an overall negative value-added assoeia~ with increased
population ~ in what is now pmtmnins~ly a 2 1/2 acre minimum pazcelm The
following are perceived to be the ~associa~ with an increase in zoning density
and are contrary to the 'highest and best uae' ofthe Nicolas Valley area:
Decreasedqual~d~rtmdlife~le
Inereasedvehicularandpedemiantnt~
Increased local population density and crime
Negat~ impact for safe equemian unSg
Further er,.alcstion d an ~ endanSered ~ixci~:
The 'Rural Temeculan Resident'
Nicolas Valley Study Recommendslion Page 2
We can fred no clear overriding pmitive aspect, (either financially, culturally or quality d
life enlmncin$) tothe pwpmal to change ~he existi~ zonin~ from R-R-2 1/2. We loca~l
~o Temecula, spec~ic~lly in ~he Nicolas Valley area, to enjoy the riches d hhe rural lifestyle.
more ways hhan one.
We are not developers, but are homeowners ~ in the immediate neighborhoods d
the Nicolas Valley Special Study and our ~ are directly impacl~ by the results avxi
recommendations that this plxx:t~ w~l l:wochwe. We intend to be/tpl~sented when the
study rtcommenda~iom are bwu~ before the Phtud~ Commisdon and subsequently the
City Council. We would like this letter tobe Placed on record as beinZ in~to
Additionally, we wmald like to extend our gratitude to the you and the commism'cm
members for rewgnizing the residents who voiced their oppc,~l,~n to the Johnson Ranch
hiZh density residential pxoposaL We believe that Tentec, ula is fuIly capable of becoming
an ~,~-~tive mix dmral r=idential ~ coupled with aimlance dliSl~ indusWial
tEsperity, self-w, lhn~ and rural c~ second to none. It can establish itself as a
shining example for others on how to mature as a community withou~ the ills sf611-~e~
with l~h ~ resiaential development which have ~ Southern California.
Gr~Dunczn
RECEIVED
F e eI99S
i
February 14, 1995
TO:
The City of Temecula
Temecula Fhnning Comntissicm
4S174 Business Far~I)rive
ATTENTION:
Chairman Ford; Ccwmx~s~ners Bhir, Fahey, slaven az',~d Webster
N/colas Valley Special Study Recommendation
I would 1/ke to thank you and the city staff for undertaking' the extra effort of
orchestrating the special study meetings for the residents of the Nicolaz Valley Special
Study area. The information was enliZhtexdnz and valuable. The individuals from the
city staff were always professional and courteous to what could be described as a
sometimes 'lively' crowd. Titis is exemplary city government, "of the people, for the
people and by the people'. All involved should be commended. I rcccommend that
no change be made to the Current Nicolas Valley Area Zoning.
The first study meeting was at~ended by rouZtdy 5096 of the property owners. Roughly
half were opposed to increased zoninz density. The second meeting was artended by
rouXhly 2096 of the tn~pex~ owners. RouZldy 8096 were opposed to increased zoning
density. A handful of residents were in favor of doing ~somethinz' and this floated
alonX the lines of improvements tO drainaXe and circulation, but nor necessarily
I believe that there is an overall negative value-_~ed usociatecl w~th increased
population density in what is now l=edomixmtely a 2 1/2 acre minimum parcel are~
The following are perceived to be the negatives associated with an increase in zoning
density and are contrax~ to the 'highes~ and best use' of the Nicolas Valley ares~
l
l
I
Decreased quality of current rural lifestyle
Increased vehicular and pedestrian bxffic
Increased local population density and crime
Negative impact. for safe equestrian usage
Further eradication of an unlisted endangered species:
The 'Fd,xral Temeculan Resident'
Nicolas Valley Special Study Recommendation Page
I can find no clear overriding positive aspects, (either financially, culturally or quality.
of life enhancing) to the pzvposal to change the existing zoninX.~ R-R-2 1/2. I
located to Temecula, specifically in the Nicolas Valley aru, to envy the riches of the
rural lifestyle. I do not desire, nor can I afford, the costs associated with
improvements, assessments, etc. which are directly linked to increased density. In this
regard I would be poorer in more ways than one.
I am not a developer, but am a homeowner residing in the immediate neighborhoods
of the Nicoias Valley Special Study and my lifestyles are directly impacted by the results
and recommendations that this process will produce. I intend to be represented when
the study recommendations are brought before the P1anni~ Commission and
subsequently the City Council. I would like this letter to be placed on record as being
in opposition to zoning density increases when the hearing is conducted.
Additionally, I would like to extend my gratitude to the you and the commission
members for ~ the residents who voiced their opposition to the Johnson
Ranch high density residen~sl l~:oposd. I believe that Temecula is fully capable of
becominS an attractive mix of rural residential units coupled with a balance of light
industrial businesses. This distinctive association can offer the community an
opportunity for prosperity, self-reliance and rur~ charisma second to none. It can
establish itself as a shining example for others on how to mature as a community
without the ills ~ted with high density residential development which have
Mease continue to maintin a questioni~ attitude re~arding the merit of h/gh density
residential growth pz~posed by land developers, especially in the Johnson and
Roripaugh projem which impact my immediate area. I am a member of a growing
population of local rural residents who stand in opposition to the intense residential
development of rural Temeoula and its c:irrent spheres of influence. We are
collectively known as CaRT - Coalition for a Rural Temecula, Use my voice to
communicate to the representatives of these projects that we believe in adding greater
value to Temecula through less-dense, rural-residential development.
ATTACHMENT NO. 5
LETTERS SUPPORTING INCREASES IN LAND USE DESIGNATION
2/17/95
To: Craig Ruiz
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Dr.
Temecula, Ca. 92590-3606
General Plan / Nicolas Valley Study Area
Assessor Parcel No t s 9.14-500-'12,13, 14,15, 8, & 10
Dear Craig
-As pointed out at the 2/13/95 work shop, =here is a tremendous
drainage and future infrastructure impact along Nicolas road.
The burden is greater on my property than most.o=her's.
Density intensifica=ion is necessary to ever hope to bear the
cost associated with any future development for my property.
In order that I might~be able to carry those cos~ I respectfully:
request a medium to high density designation for this entire ·
block, including AP ~ 914-500-8,9,10,12,13,14,15,16,& 17, This
block is bordered by Nicolas Rd.,North - Calle Medusa, West
and Calle Girasol, East.
Tract ~s 18518,23483,22148, and 23220 (map included) are
directly adjacent and border my block to the south. These tracts
are 7200 sq. ft. lots with a total of 584 plus homes and are
occupied now. The city park site is also adjacent to this block.
Please review the exhibits enclosed and prepare a copy for each
commissioner for the. meeting.
Thank you for your help in this matter. If you have any questions
regarding any of the above, please feel free to call Ron Rauch,
at (714) 583-0441
Sincerely,
~ 2/17/95
To: Craig Ruiz
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Dr.
Temecula, Ca. 92590-3606
General Plan / Nicolas Valley Study Area Z
Assessor Parcel No~s 914-500-12,13,14,15,8,& 10
Dear Craig
As pointed out at the 2/13/95 work shop, there is a ~remendous
drainage and future infrastructure impact along'Nicolas road.
The burden is greater on my property than most other's.
Density intensification is necessary to ever hope'to bear the
cost associated with any future development for my property.
In order that I migh~ be able to carry those cost, I respeczfully
request a medium to high density designation for this entire
block, including AP I 914-500-8,9,10,12,13,14,15,16,& 17, This
block is bordered by Nicolas Rd.,North - Calle Medusa, West
and Calle Girasol, East.
Tract #'s 18518,23483,22148, and 23220 (map included) are
directly adjacent and border my block to the south. These tracts
are 7200 sq. ft. lots with a total of 584 plus homes and are
occupied now. The city park site is also adjacent to this block.
Please review =he exhibits enclosed and prepare a copy for each
commissioner for the meeting.
Thank you for your help in
regarding any of the above,
at (714) 583-0441
this matter. If you have any questions
please feel free to call Ron Rauch,
Sincerely,
February 28,1995
Mr. C. mig Ruiz
City of Temecula
Planning D~pam~nt
43174 Business Park Drive
Tenw, eula, CA 92~90
RE: Nicholas Valley Special Study
RECEIVED
0 11 95
....
Thank you for setting up the meeting to obtain the opinion of the property owners in the
Nicolas Valley. While I appreciate the effort to derive three scenarios for developmere in
the area, I think all three missed the mar~ This group of diverse propen}, owners cannot be
treated as a few major land developers. What you basically offered was a trade of potential
ZOning for development fees, the usual icind of deal with developers. While developers see
this as a business deal, most homeowners surely cannot, especially if they like the land that
they have as is. In addition, the itnpwvements offered were simply not much of a benefit.
We should not need improve Nicolas Road, when the main collectors are Calle Cdrasol and
Liefer Roads, both of which will soon be paved regardless. We should also not try to turn
flood plains into housing tracts by lining the creeks at great cost and then creating
liquefaction problems, This is not what the people in the area want, even the ones who own
property for speculative purposes. It's no wonder that little interest was shown in your
proposals. These proposal would increase the tax burden for many years in exchange for
potential financial gain that can't be realiTed until the property is cut up.
I also do not agree that a consensus was reached for all Nicolas Valley landowners at the
meeting. Many of the lot owners were absentees and could not make time meethg. I know
flint some of them bought property they expected to be able to split in order to finance
dream houses or make retirement more comfortable. We did not hear from these folks.
ff this area is develop into an quality rural residential neighborhood, the current very low
density zoning must be changed. The currently developed properties are quite varied, and
for this reason the area cannot support mansions of the type in Santiago Ranchos which
have the same minimum lot size. The problem now is that the land has litfie value since
dwelling units cannot be constructed without the major expense of bring an all-weather
road from the unit to existing all-weather road. When Calle GirasoVC. alle Chapos and
Liefer are paved, the land will become more val-able, making it feasible to build higher
quality homes, one of the few viable land uses since small projects with inexpensive homes
could not compete with the major subdivisions. Given the varied owners, from land
specnlators to fixed income retirees, the usllal developer-city bargaining cannot be
followed. I propose a different approach based on the following:
1. Let the creeks be creeks and make no special effort to turn flood plains into housing
tracts. The highest density shown in your proposals was in the flood plaln.~ (since they are
fiat) when actually many of the lots should have zew density unless the owner performs
remedialion as a condition to development.
2. Allow zoningfrom 1/2 to 2 1/2 acres in the General Plan depending on the specific
topography of the pwperty and the willingness of the owner to perform the necessary
remediation. Don~t tie the general plan to improvements at the start, but mandate
improvements as a requirement for lot splits to less than the current 2 1/2 acres.
3. The improvements to Nicolas Road should be borne by the mega developments
proposed by Roripaugh and Johnson. They will have thousands of houses that would
routinely use this road co~-pn.~l to a few trsi. clences in the Nicolas Valley that really need
the mad.
4. Other than the soon-to-be completed ~mprovements on Calle Girasol/Calle Chapos and
Liefer Roads, let p~of~t ty owners be responsible for them. Most of these will be short
sections of road affecting only a relatively few properties. The existing requ~n~nts for
paved, all-weather access for new dwellings is ~t to enforce the needed
iHlproveftlents.
5. If ~ improvements are required, oonect fees per lot as a part of the split process and
put them in as they can financed.
I hope that you will consider the points raised. I think most of us prolz, ty owners in the
Nioolas Valley, especially those of us who live here now, want ti~ area to mnain rural in
take this into account and provide us with tls: needed flem'bili~ to create tis: neighborhood
that we desire. Please don't rush to a decision. Let absentee landownen (which I am
contacted to uptints- the sip~ntiotl) have their say. If at all possible, any decisiml should be
made after the paving of the collector rcstl!. W'~hout your help, the Nioolas Valley will
be proud of.
Temecula, CA 92591
cc: Planning Commission
ATTACHMENT NO. 4
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
APRIL 3, 1995
R:~S'FAFFRFF~PAN.CC ~/16/95 vfv 6
DRAFT
lecula Plannine Commission
March
~95
Wright, Temecula spoke in favor of the project.
CC
COlT
INPUT
~r Slaven asked staff to work through on changing
)rimary colors.
Coral
through this.
~ir had a concern with the large parking
After discussion the
by:
>wing items were recognized
asked staff to work
lee everyone could abide
No sign to be id.
Elimination of primary and blue
station and the red on
Additional landscaping in
Shops F and I, to be c
building.
Attractive benches as res
Facia on theater/Major F
Shopping cart ~reas to
MacDonalds canopy styled to
Pedestrian walk-w~
the blue stripe on the Chevron.
g lot.
at the same time as the theater/Major Four
along main drive aisle.
to appear as several small buildings.
ade more attractive by Ralphs.
with the entire center.
}proaching from southwesterly corner of the center.
It was moved by
Planning Application No.
Parcel Map.
Blair and seconded by
~5CUPand Planning
missioner Slaven to approve the
No. PA94-0097,Tentative
The motion carried
~WS-'
AYES: 4 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Fahey,
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSEI 0 COMMISSIONERS: NONE
AB~ ,IN: I COMMISSIONERS: Ford
~bster
Fahey called for a recess at 9:20 p.m.
~g of the Temecula Planning Commission was reconvened at 9:30
ommissioner Ford presiding.
with
4. Nicolas Valley Soecial Study (PA94-0098}
Associate Planner Saied Naaseh-Shahry presented the staff report which highlighted
the background for the study. Representatives from NBS Lowmy presented the draft
opportunities and constraints analysis end the alternative land uses for the Nicolas
Valley.
R:%Minutee~:)3069S.pc 3
Temecula Plannino Commission
PUBLIC HEARING
The public hearing was opened at 10:00 PM
DRAFT
March 6, 1995
Dennis Fit"z, 39910 Jeffrey Hights Road, stated he was in favor raising density and
wants the study to go forward to find alternatives for the property in Nicolas Valley.
Helen Lasangna, P.O. Box 1136, spoke against raising density or paving the roads in
Nicolas Valley.
Tom Koleuch, 5433 W. 117th Street, Inglewood, spoke in opposition to increased land
use in Nicolas Valley.
C. E. Edwards, 39675 Nicolas Road, spoke in opposition to increased density.
Vic Deforest, 39675 Cantrell Rd., opposed development for economic, environmental
and other reasons.
Jerry Montante, 31606 Calla Gerasol, was in favor of a possible change in land use
due to proposed build-out in the eastern portion of the study area.
Lynn Owen, P. O. Box 1991, Nuevo opposed change in the area of Nicolas Valley.'
Ron Rauch, 25301 Cabot Rd., Laguna, acting as spokesman for owners of nine parcels
in the Nicolas Valley stated the group would like to have a separate increased land use
designation for their parcels.
Tha public hearing was closed at 10:20 PM
Commissioner Slaven asked that staff provide information on the emergency vehicle
passage way on the dirt roads in Nicolas Valley.
Commission concerns for staff investigation were as follows:
· Alternatives in density
· Roripaugh/Johnson Ranch status
· Currant Assessment Districts and how the changes in future roads will be
funded,
· What standards are included in the Master Plan
· Clarification on how A.D. 161 was formed
· Status on flooding and elevation
It was moved by Commissioner Blair, seconded by Commissioner Slaven to continue this
matter to April 3, 1995.
R:%Minutes%O30695.pc 4
DRAFT
Temecula Plannine Commission
March 6.1995
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 5
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 0
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
Blair, Fahey, Slaven, Webster, Ford
NONE
NONE
DIRECTOR'S REPORT
·
i
·
~ning Director Thornhill reported on the following:
will be received on the school mitigation plan issue 28th of March.
;ouncil conducted the first reading of the Vendor ince for approval.
has awarded the contract for user fees.
Janet k has been hired as the Main Street inator and the Planning.'
Depa looking forward to working
PLANNING COMMISSION SSION
The Commission asked
motorists making "U" Turns
mffic Commission look into the abuse by
io Bank on Ynez Road.
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Commissioner
adjourned at 10:40 p.m. to
Elementary School
California.
Next re
room, 4
and by Commissioner Slaven the meeting be
~nson Ranch March 13, 1995 6:00 p.m., Vail
Multipurpose Room, ~915 Mira Loma Drive; Temecula,
March 20, 1995, 6:00 p.m., Rancho
i Winchester Road, Temecule, California.
liforole Water District's Board
Chairman Steve Ford
Secretary
R:Wlinutee%O3069S.pc 5
ATTACHMENT NO. 5
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
MARCH 6, 1995
~-~TA~mPr~PA~4.CC ~l~J5 ~ 7
CITY OF TB~ECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
Banning Commission
Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning,L~"'*~''
DATE:
April 3, 1995
SUBJECT:
Continued Public Hearing for Planning Application No. PA94-0098, Nicolas
Valley Special Study
Prepared By:
RECOMMENDATION:
Craig D. Ruiz, Assistant Banner
RECOMMEND to the City Council that no Changes be Made to
the Land Use Designation within the Nicolas Valley Study Area.
BACKGROUND
The Nicolas Valley Special Study was previously heard by the Planning Commission at their
March 6, 1995 meeting. Planning staff and the City's consultant presented the report and the
Commission heard public testimony before continuing the item to the April 3, 1995 meeting.
Prior to continuing the item, the Commission directed staff to respond to concerns raised by
the Commission and members of the public at the April 3, 1995 meeting.
DISCUSSION
Public Services
Commissioner Slaven expressed concern regarding the provision of public services in the
Nicolas Valley area due to the unpaved roads. Goal 3.1 of the Public Safety Element of the
General Plan requires that the City ensure the provision of adequate facilities and police and
fire-service personnel. The current City requirement is that paved, all-weather access be
provided for new development. At the present time, during situations when the roads are
impassable, the residents do not receive adequate public services (trash, fire, police).
Potential Reauirements for Johnson Ranch and Rorioauah Ranch
Commissioner Webster requested that staff provide the Commission with the infrestructum
requirements for the Johnson Ranch Specific Plan {SP) and the Roripaugh Ranch SP. The
Johnson Ranch SP draft conditions of approval require the developer to provide for two-lanes,
paved, all-weather access on Nicolas from Joseph Road to Butterfield Stage Road, The
Roripaugh SP is still in the initial stages and draft conditions of approval have not been
prepared for the project. However, staff anticipates that, at a minimum, the Roripaugh Ranch
SP will have a similar two-lane, paved all weather access requirement as the Johnson Ranch
SP (resulting in four lanes of improvements in total).
R:\FORNS%NEII) 3/30/95 ktb 1
Assessment Districts
Members of the public and Commission raised questions regarding the existing assessment
districts in the area and the ~equiraments to form a district. The Nicolas Valley study area
des not lie within an Assessment District. The nearest Assessment District (AD), AD 161
ends at the westedy boundary of the study area. However, there are City-wide assessments
that the City des charge property owners through their property tax bill. These charges
include: Operation and Maintenance of City parks, facilities, programs and activities; Service
Level A, arterial street lighting, medians, and traffic signal lighting; and Service Level D, refuse
collection and recycling.
As for the formation of an assessment district, a majority vote of the property owners is
required. At the last Commission hearing, some members of the public stated that, in the case
of A D 161, many property owners were unaware they were within the District. Generally,
large land owners form assessment districts to fund the improvements for future subdivisions.
These newly subdivided parcels then become pert of the assessment district. As required by
the State Department of Real Estate, the seller must provide the buyer with a disclosure
statement (White Report) indicating that the land is within an assessment district.
Unfortunately, it is possible that buyers either do not completely read their White Report or
may not understand the implications of being within a district.
Rood Elevation Difference for Nicolas Road
Commissioner Ford requested that staff determine how high Nicolas Road would need to be
elevated to be removed from the 100-year flood plain. Neither the City nor the Federal
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) have done a detailed analysis of the limits of the
100-year flood plain. However, based upon preliminary information, staff estimates that
Nicolas Road would need to be elevated a minimum of three feet on average to be elevated
out of the flood plain.
Access Restriction on Nicolas Road
Commissioner Ford requested that staff provide information regarding how the General Ran
access restriction requirement would affect current and future development along Nicolas
Road. While an existing legal parcel along Nicolas Road would be allowed to take access from
Nicolas Road, future subdivisions along Nicolas Road may, as a condition of approval, be
required to provide an alternative access or create a single public/private access road to
several properties.
General Plan Circulation
Several Commissioners questioned how it is determined that certain projects are constructed
by the City while other projects are not. As part of the City's annual budget process, the City
prepares a Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for the provision of public improvements over
five year period. Projects are scheduled based upon a priority ranking system ultimately
approved by the City Council. Projects are ranked Priority I (highest) through Priority 4
(lowest). For circulation projects, all Priority 1 projects are again ranked by their priority. The
CIP circulation projects in the Nicoles Valley include the Walcott Corridor (Priority 1 ), Nicolas
Road (Priority 4) and Butterfield Stage Road (Priority 4).
R:\FOIBIS~BIO 3/30/95 ktb'
Reauest for Hieher Density
As shown in Attachment No. 2, a representative for the property owners of Study Areas G
& J is requesting that this area receive increased density {Medium Residential, 7-12 Dwelling
Units Per Acre). The representative feels that this designation would be both a logical
extension of the existing single family development to the south of Study Area J, and would
facilitate the necessary infrastructure improvements need for the area.
In reviewing this request, staff has examined the land use patterns in this area. While Study
Area J is bounded by single family "tract" housing to the south, the study area is also
bounded by R-A-2 ½ zoning {2 ½ acre minimum parcel size) on the north, east and west. It
is staff's opinion that the creation of an "island" of medium density residential development
among R-A-2 ½ parcels would create inconsistent land use petterns. Also, the development
to the south of Study Area J ends at the top of · ridge.. The ridgeline creates a natural
topographical boundary for the Study Area. Therefore, staff does not support this request.
CONCLUSION
As stated in the March 6, 1995 staff report, it is staff's opinionthat the Nicolas Valley could
support an increase in land use intensity. However, based upon the input of the majority of
area residents, it is staff's recommendation that the Planning Commission recommend to the
City Council that the Very Low Residential Land Use Designation for the Nicolas Valley remain
unchanged·
Attachments:
March 6, 1995 Planning Commission Staff Report - Blue Page 4
Letters Requesting Increased Density - Blue Page 5
R=\F0~Ii%IIN0 3/30/~5 ktb 3
ATTACHMENT NO. '1
MARCH 6, 1995 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
R:\FQRIIS~!BC
kl.b
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
LETTERS REQUESTING INCREASED DENSITY
R:\STAFFRPT\98PA94.PC2
3/Z9/95 ktb
Greomp lie,
A Red ~mte & IX. veloma~mt Compmy
March 16, 1995
Mr. Craig Ruiz
Assistant Planner
Planning Dept.
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, Ca. 92590-3606'
Ref: General Plan /~Ntcolas Valley Study Area
Assessor Parcel-NO's 914-500-8,9,10,12,13,14,15,16 & 17.
~ Nine (9) Parcels, Totaling Forty (40) +/- acres.
Dear Craig:
The above-properties are curren=!y owned by Mr. Robert Droiet,
Ms. Be LaForce, and Mr.& Mrs. George Starcevich; and RSD Group,
Inc. has been asked to represent their interests in this matter.
The above named owners have been involved in the Nicolas Valley
area in excess of Thirty (30) years and have submitted the
appropriate requests seeking a "density intensification" for
their entire block.
The designation' requested is M 7-12 (Medium Density Seven to
Twelve Dwelling Units per Acre), Single Family Residential Units,
and the entire block is buffered on Three (31 sides by the
existing roads known as: Nicolas Rd.- North; Calla Medusa- West;
and Calla Girasol- East. The Southern boundary to the entire
block is adjacent to Medium Density (7,200 Sq. Ft.Lots), Single
Family Residential Units.
· These properties represent an assemblage of necessity, and
collectively will be conditioned upon improvements to: Calla
Medusa; Calla Girasol; and Nicolas Rd. As you know, there are
flood plain, drainage, and flood control issues that can be
mitigated in a feasible manner; providing the entire Forty (40}
+/- Acres, the full block, can be developed simultaneously.
For example, the Nineteen (19) Acres fronting Nicolas Rd. are
primarily in.the ~lood plain area, and studies have indicated a
need for approximately Sixty Five ~housand (65,000) cu. yds. of
25301 Cabot Road, Suite 21 6 * Laguna Hills, CA 926B · (7~ 4) 583-0441
import dirt. This will then accommodate the raising of both
Nicolas Rd. and the Sixteen (16} Acres in the flood plain,
approximately Two (21 Feet in elevation. This import yardage
requirement is available from the subject Forty (40) Acres.
In addition; at some future date, there will be a need for a
major drainage device to be installed at Zhe intersection
Calle Girasol and Nicolas Rd. Through "density intensification",
of the subject Forty (40} Acres, this project will be capable of
mitigating all improvements and cost issues, as well.
The current HEC Study submitted by the Robert Bein, William Frost
& Associete's engineers for The City, reflects a' Cu. Ft./Sec. of
8,800. This Study Area targeted is the Santa Gertrud!s Creek at
Calle Girasol.
The impact is tremendous on the subject properties, and the total
costs must be amortized over approximately Two Hundred (200)
Units, or the proposed project feasibility will be in serious
doubt. These improvements can most likely be conditioned and
agreed during the Tentative Map process; and again, the project
could then amortize the total costs within the project.
No Mello-Roose andno Assessment Districts would be necessary.
The properties are adjacent and congruent to each other; and on
behalf of the owners, we respectfully request a M 7-12 (Media%
Density Seven to Twelve Dwelling Units per Acre), Single Family
Residential Unit designation.
Craig, we've enclosed Six (6) additional copies of this
correspondence for any and all individuals who may have an
interest in the project, and we thank you in advance for your
time and consideration.
Sincerely,
RSD Group, Inc.
Ronald J. Rauch
President
ATTACHMENT NO. 6
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
MARCH 6, 1995
5;16/93 vs, w 8
TEM~'tu ^ p~ANNING COMMISSION
The motion carried a~\,':,~'.~nws:
DRAFT
AYES: 4 COMM~R'-, RS: ' Fahey, Slaven,
~/--/ Ford
NOE~y~/~ COMMISSI
/~BSENT: I COMMISSIONERS: Blair
APRIL 3. 1995
Webster,
PUBLIC HEARING ITFMS
3. Nicolas Valley Special Studv (PA94-0098)
Craig Ruiz, Assistant Planner, responded to the concerns of the
Commission expressed at the last Commission meeting. Staff
recommends no increase in density and no change in the land use for
Nicolas Valley.
Commissioner Slaven asked about the liability of the City should
emergency vehicles not be able to drive into the area. City Attorney Greg
Diaz responded the City would not be exposed to liability because the
roads had been accepted for emergency maintenance.
Commissioner Fahey left the dias at 6:10 PM to take an emergency
phone call.
PUBLIC HEARING
The public hearing was opened at 6:30 P.M.
Betty Sprouse, 39390 Liefer Road spoke against any changes in the
area.
James McCarthy, 39420 Pala Vista Road, spoke against any changes on
Nicolas Road.
Diane Welter, 39515 Liefer Road, said she wants to leave the area as it
is.
Rita Abby, 39520 Liefer Road, spoke in opposition to assessments and
does not want increased density.
Helen Lasagna, 30885 Nicolas Road, stated she feels Butterfield Road
should be developed by Roripaugh Ranch and other developers and no
assessment fees be placed on the residents.
R:%Minutee .po'd 20594 1
DRAFT
TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION APRIL 3. 1995
Staff explained that all roads were reviewed in the study and for
discussion only. Staff recommends leaving the area as is and that no
assessment fees be incurred.
C.E. Edwards, 31250 Nicolas Road, spoke against re-zoning.
Commissioner Fahey returned to the dias at 6:35 PM
Dennis Fisk, 39910 Jeffrey Heights Road, said he feels change is evident '
and zoning should be done on a one to one basis.
Frank Furgiuele, 400 Ambulant Court Temecula, spoke in favor of rural
area and zoning maintained at 2 1/2 acre parcels.
Larry Bales, 3040 Jessie Circle, spoke against change in the area.
Mike Melton, 31950 Pala Vista Road, Temecula, representing rural area
residents who want the area to remain rural.
Ron Rauch, 25301 Cabot Road, Laguna, acting as spokesman for owners
of nine parcels in the Nicolas Valley stated the group would like to have
density intensification for the quality of the area.
The public hearing was closed at 6:55 PM
COMMISSION INPUT
Commissioner Webster agreed with staff that the area should remain at
2 1/2 acre density and the rural element maintained.
It was moved by Commissioner Blair and seconded by Commissioner Fahey to approve
the staff recommendation to the City Council there be no change in Land Uses within
the study area of Nicolas Valley.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 5 COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 0
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
Fahey, Slaven, We'bster,
Ford, Blair
None
None
Commissioner Ford wanted to have on record that the Johnson Ranch
and the Roripaugh Development are proposed projects and if not
approved would not materialize.
R:\Minutes.pc%120594 2
ITEM 16
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
-Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
May 23, 1995
Spray Injection Machine
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council review and discuss the report on Spray Injection Machines, and provide
direction to staff.
BACKGROUND:
An article in the April, 1995 issue of Institute of Transportation Studies (ITS) described a piece
of equipment for pothole repairs. At their regular meeting of April 25, 1995 City Council
directed the staff to report on that piece of equipment. I requested Brad Buron, our
Maintenance Superintendent to arrange with Mr. Don Bender, City of San Diego Maintenance
Superintendent a demonstration of capabilities of the equipment. On May 9, 1995, Mayor
Stone, Brad Buron, and Joseph Kicak traveled to San Diego, where we observed the
equipment filling potholes. For that purpose the equipment is extremely efficient and in my
opinion performs as described in the ITS article (copy attached). The major disadvantage is
the fact that the high efficiency of that equipment is limited to filling of the potholes.
Currently, our crews milize pre-mixed, bagged asphalt concrete for that purpose. Although
much less efficient than utilizing the Spray Injection Machine, current history of pothole repairs
indicates that due to the number of "Potholes" patched, utilization of this equipment in the
City would be at a very low level.
Based on the reports for this fiscal year a total of 4,654 sq. ft. of potholes was patched by
our crews from July 1, 1994 to April 30, 1995. Assuming an average of four (4) sq. ft. per
pothole, the total number of potholes patched during that period was less than 1,200. Based
on the article in ITS, the equipment can patch 100 potholes (average) per day. This translates
into 12 working days for that piece of equipment from July 1, 1994 to April 30, 1995.
During the demonstration, we inquired about the equipment's capability to patch a strip such
as five (5) feet wide and ten (1 O) feet long. We were advised that it would be inefficient and
the standard construction method for such repairs would be utilized much more efficiently.
-I- r.~gdqet%gb'~OS23%smay. agn/aile
Considering that the City of Sen Diego, with older streets and almost 3,000 miles of total
street mileage, it appears that such equipment could be used effectively. In the City of
Temecula, majority of the streets are relatively new with a total mileage accepted for
maintenance of approximately 1 O0 miles.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
ATTACHMENTS:
1. ITS April, 1995 issue
-2- ~gdmt~,gS%OS23~.epray.agnJ~l)
INSTITUTE OF
TRANSPORTATION
STUDIES
ALSO IN THIS ISSUE:
The Case for Spray Irljection
Energy Saving LED Traffic Signals
Computer Access to C~ty Hall
APRIL 1995
,_ -~
TECH
TRANSFER
Technology Transfer Program
University of California
A National
Report on
Cost-Effective
Pothole .
under such conditions is a challenge. The
remaining potholes are typically ~epaired as
part of routine maintenance in warm. dry
weather, creating an opportunity to place
patches that will last as long as the pavement
that surrounds them.
With a goal of helping highway agencies to
optim ize their pothole repair operations, the
Strategic Highway Research Program
(SHRP) conducted a comprehensive study
to identify materials and procedures that
would provide longer-lasting repairs. In
essence, SHRP's effort was initiated to
answer two basic questions:
( Conrimmed on pa.~e re.o)
Cost-Effective Pothole Repair
( Continued from page one )
· Which materials last longer under all
weather conditions?
· Which procedure is cost effective?
National Experiment on Pothole Repair
The pothole experiment was done in two
phases. In the first phase, promising materi-
als with a history of good performance were
identified through a questionnaire distrib-
uted to state Departments of Transportation
and other transportation agencies around the
world, a search of available literature and in-
depth interviews with knowledgeable people.
Materials were then selected for field instal-
lation at sites distributed through the U.S.
and one Canadian province. The locations
were Alturas, California; Modoc Point, Or-
egon; Draper, Utah; Las Vegas, New Mexico;
Greenville, Texas; Vandalia, Illinois;
Bradford, Vermont; and Prescott, Ontario.
Based on this work, SHRP developed a
manual of practice for longer-lasting repair
of potholes entitled, "Materials and Proce-
dures for the Repair of Potholes in Asphalt-
Surfaced Pavements." Each public agency
in California can receive a briefing session
and one free copy of the manual by contact-
ing a University of California.field
engineer (see page 11 for a list of field
engineers and their service areas) or by
calling the Technology Transfer Center at
(510) 231-9590. A SHRP manual on repair-
ing cracks in asphalt pavements is included
in the same volume.
The pothole repair manual discusses, in easy-
to-follow language, the various stockpiled
and packaged cold mix asphalt concrete
materials and installation procedures that
will give the most cost-effective, long'last-
ing patches under all weather conditions.
John Hibbs, a consultant working to help
disseminate results of the SHRP work to
local transportation agencies, said one of the
most useful aspects of the manual is its cost
comparison of the various procedures and a
step-by-step procedure for calculating cost-
effectiveness for any agency's current pot-
hole repair needs.
"I would say to public works directors, 'What
you're doing may be as good or better than
what SHRP did. But take the time to do a
little cost comparison using our tables. You
can compare your costs to what researchers
found all over the country. "'
'NI/hat you're doing
may be as good or
better than what
SHRP did. But take
the time to do a little
cost comparison using
our tables. You can
compare your costs to
what researchers
found all over the
country."
- John Hibbs, consultant
Materials Chosen for Testing
SHRP's field research tested three different
types of cold mixed asphalt concrete: those
produced by a local plant using local mate-
rials, those produced by a local plant in
accordance with an agency's specifications,
and proprietary cold mixes - brand-name
products in which the asphalt and the aggre-
gate are carefully matched according to a
precise formula. The proprietary materials
tested by SHRP were UPM High
Performance Cold Mix, QPR 2000 and
Perma-Patch. The "agency specified"
category included PennDOT 485, PennDOT
486 and FHMS-2 mixes.
Hot mix asphalt concrete was not field tested.
Explaining their rationale, SHRP research-
ers said the superior performance of hot mix
when placed in dry holes was well docu-
mented in the survey phase of the SHRP
effort. Furthermore. hot mix is not readily
available throughout the year in many pans
of the country and generally is not used in
wet or wintry weather.
Although hot mix for pothole patching is
more common in California than in the
nation as a whole because of milder weather
:and more hot mix plants in much of the state,
most agencies still use cold mix for winter
patching.
Two findings from the survey phase of the
SHRP research may be of particular interest
to California public works directors:
· In dry holes, hot mix and proprietary cold
mixes perform about the same.
· Proprietary mixes last two to four ti~
long as conventional cold mixes in colt. . ~
wet conditions.
SHRP researchers also found that dry holes
significantly improve patch life.
Procedures Tested
In its field testing phase, SHRP evaluated
three procedures for patching potholes:
throw-and roll, semi-permanent and spray
injection.
The throw-and-roll technique is a high-pro- '
duction technique with some ~/ariation from
the commonly used throw-and-go or "dump-
and-run" technique. In the throw-and-roll
technique, the patch is compatited using the
truck's tires. It consists of the following
steps:
· Place the mix in the hole (which may
have water and loose aggregate in it).
· Compact the patch by rolling with truck
tires five or six times.
· Leave some crown on the patch.
· Move to the next hole. ~---~.
The semi-permanent method. also knc,
the "do it fight" method, has long been
2 TECH TRANSFER University of California
POTHOLE REPAIR
The throw-and-roll
procedure can be as
effective as the
semi-permanent
procedure when
quality materials are
used.
considered one of the preferred methods of
repairing potholes. The steps include:
4~ Remove water and loose aggTegate.
~ Square the sides of the patch area with
vertical faces.
· Place the mix.
J.,Compact with a device smaller than the
l',.h area (single drum vibratory rollers
,/ibratory plate compactors work best).
4~ Clean and clear the work area before
reopening to traffic.
Although the procedure provides longer last-
ing patches, it does require more workers
and equipment and longer times to patch (as
much as four times the throw-and-roll pro-
cedure). This consequently results in lower
productivity, longer worker exposure to traf-
fic, and longer motorists' delay.
The spray-injection technique, also known
as "velocity fill," requires specialized equip-
ment for patching. There are two types of
units, trailer-mounted or self-contained truck
units. Regardless of the type, the device
places virgin ag=~regate and heated emulsion
into the pothole simultaneously at high
velocity. This procedure can be carried out
in most weather conditions.
The procedure consists of the following steps:
· Blow water and loose material from the
"pray a tack coat of binder on the sides
d~ bottom.
· Blow emulsion and aggregate into the
hole.
· Cover the patched area with a layer of
aggregate.
4~ Clean and clear the area before opening
to traffic.
The equipment will not work for proprietary
materials and does require a skilled operator
to obtain a good patch.
Spray-injection
patches perform as
well as most of the
other patches
although the devices.
don t use proprietary
materials.
Summary of Techniques
SHRP's field experiment results, relative to
installation procedures, showed that:
· The throw-and-roll procedure can be as
effective as the semi-permanent procedure
when quality materials are used.
Cost Effectiveness of Patching
, Spray-injection patches perform as well
as most of the other patches although the
devices donTt use proprietary materials.
These results have prompted Some agencies
to switch from the inexpensive cold mixes
they were using previously to one of the
quality materials used in the experiment.
One agency has also purchased a spray-
injection device to replace its conventional
cOld-mix patching material.
Designing a Cost Effective System
When planning a program for pothole
pairs, the cost of material is the least signifi-
cant of the three costs associated with the
operation. Labor and equipment are bigger
contributors to the overall cost. This fact is
emphasized in the table below. '
The chart shows the cost of filling a cubic
foot ofpothole using different materials and
procedures. The data on patch life are from
SHRP field research. The analysis is for a
five-year period.
As the chart indicates, the throw-and-roll
procedure using high-quality material will
provide cost-effective patches. Compaction
with truck fires as part of the throw-and-roll
technique is a must. Use of a spray injection
device by a qualified operator will also pro-
vide cost-effective patches.O
Source: Strategic Highway Research Program
' Material Type Local Proprietary Local Spray
In~eetion
Procedure Throw- Throw- Semi- Spray
and-Roll and-Roll Permanent Injection
Materials, S/ton 20 85 20 0
Crew, S/day 300 300 600 0
Traffic, S/day 250 250 250 250
Equipment, S/day 80 80 130 930
Productivity, tons/day 4.0 4.0 1.5 4.0
Tons Required 200 200 75 200
Patch Life, months 3 21 12 21
5-Year Cost, $ 710,000 139,000 252,000 168,570
COst Effectiveness, S/cubic foot 44 9 42 ll
No. 49 APRIL
The Case for Spray Injection Machines
Results of the Strategic Highway Research
Program (SHRP) show that spray injection
machines for pothole repair are no more
cost-effective than using the familiar
throw-and-roll technique with high-quality
material. However, some experienced
public works people are convinced that the
machines have certain advantages over
throw-and-roll.
Spray injection machines are blower type
machines that employ a three-stage repair
method to patch potholes: A hand-held or
boom-mounted nozzle is used to (1) blow
any loose debris and water out of the pot-
hole, (2) blow a tack coat of emulsion, and
(3) blow aggregate coated with emulsion
into the hole. The high velocity of spray
provides compaction from bottom up.
Two types of
machines are
available: truck
mounted units for
$70,000-$125,000
which can be
operated by one.
person in the cab
and trailer mounted
units for between
$25,000 and $45,000.
Two types of spray injection machines are
available: various kinds of truck mounted
units which can be operated by one person
from within the truck cab and are priced
between $70,000 and $125,000, and several
trailer mounted units that typically cost
$25,000 to $45,000.
Ned for Experienced Operators
According to John Hibbs, a consultant work-
ing to disseminate SHRP's findings, final
~-~.-
"-7
A $pray injection machine would ~ taed to blow any
loose debris or water out of a ~thole ~fore the
emulsion and ogRregate are blown into it.
reSUl, dc~fibing ~c ovc~] ~ffo~ce
of spray ~j~tion m~hines ~ a bit skewed
~cause of a problem in laying test patches at
the Alto, C~ifomi~ test site. A defiled
SH~ rear explains that ~ o~rator from
~othcr p~ of ~e count, using volc~ic
agFegate with higher abso~tive ch~cter-
istics ~ ~c o~rator w~ ~customed to,
f~led to use enough binder. Low ~sidu~
binder content !cd to raveling of the ag~-
gate ~d some premature failures. Hibbs
said ~is ~cu~nce ~ts out ~e need for
~ ex~fienced o~mtor with ~owledge of
both equipment o~mtions ~d matcfi~ ch~-
actefistics. Even with these problems, Hibbs
said, ~e C~ifomia spray injection tests
suited in 80% of test patches sullying after
18 months.
Aside ~om that round of test patches at
Al~s, Hibbs said, spray injec~on patches
slightly ou~do~ed ~ow-~d-mll ~tches
when it came to durability. (These detailed
results are covered in SHRP report H-353,
"Innovative Materials Development and
Testing Volume 2: Pothole Repair." Copies
are available through the ITS Libra~ while
supplies last.)
Hibbs, who travels the nation ~ p~ of his
contract to publicize SHRP msul~, said feed-
back from v~ous tr~s~ation agencies
h~ convinced him ~at ~c machines have
the ~tential to fill ~tholcs much f~r th~
a crew using ~e throw-~d-mll technique.
Less repair time means oreater safety for
workers and less disruption for the traveling
public. Speed of the repair crews increases
with practice, Hibbs said. and some agen-
cies have received praise from the public for
using modern equipment to speed up pot-
hole repairs.
Another argument made for spray injection
machines is that worker's compensation
~:laims may be reduced, because spraying
material into potholes is not as hard on
workers as using a shovel.
Spray injection machines are not as widely
used in California as they are in the eastern
part of the United States, perhaps because
most of the manufacturers are.based in the
Southeast or in South Dakota2 They aren't
used by the California Department ofTtans-
port,~tion, although Caltrans did lay F~""~
test patches last summer for evaluatiot
this year.
However, Lassen County and the city of San
Diego bought spray injection machines for
pothole patching early this year, They have
found the machines p.atch potholes much
faster than the crews they were using before.
"You can fill a pothole
in just a minute."
- John Mitchell,
Lassen County
Lassen County
Lassen County decided this year to purchase
the trailer-mounted Dura Patchef spray in-
jection machine it had been renting. Public
Works Director John Mitchell said the ma-
chine is much faster than a crew with shov-
els. "You can fill a pothole in just a minute,"
Mitchell said.
MitchelI's crews are using the Dura F
to fill wide cracks as well as poL. ~.
TECH TRANSFER University of California
POTHOLE REPAIR
Repairs held up remarkably well through the
storms of 1995. including March storms that
inundated northern California.
Mitchell noted that every spray injection
machine is different. He initially rented a
different brand, which he returned to the dealer
after his crew had problems operating it.
One disadvantage of the Dura Pateher,
Mitchell said, is it can only carry a few
hundred gallons of the oil needed for its
operation. So the county purchased a large
heated tank which is filled with several
thousand gallons ofoil and hauled along with
the Dura Pateher, making it possible for crews
to patch and fill on rural roads for the entire
day.
"We don't have enough money to maintain
~""~oads as we would like to, but we are
g to keep a seal on them to keep moisture
from getting into the foundation of the road-
way," Mitchell said. "Of all the machines that
we have tried so far, this seems to be the
best."
City of San Diego
The city of San Diego purchased three spray
injection trucks for pothole patching, which
were delivered in early January at about the
time the first big winter storms started hitting
the city. The trucks, made by Rosco Manu-
facturing of Madison, S.D., were purchased
from San Diego dealer Hawthorne Manufac-
turing for about $100,000 each. Each truck is
operated by one person who cleans and fills
the pothole without leaving the truck cab.
Don Bender, who supervises the city's pot-
hole repair operations, said that as of late
March, each truck was patching two to three
times as many potholes as a very productive
two-man crew working with a dump truck
and hand tools. "We patched 114 holes with
one truck today, 86 with another and one
~ came in earl ier after patching 60-some ,"
~r said. "That compares to 28 potholes,
'~;.,.. that's for a crew that really works hard."
Bender said getting used to the Rosco trucks
took some adjusting. especially since their
arrival coincided with a long series of winter
storms. Using wet aggregate is not desir-
able. he said, and a protective shelter for
aggregate is being built. Also, patching in
the rain didn't work well even though the
operator was in a protected truck. The opera-
tor could blow the water out of a pothole but
before he could place a tack coat, water
would come sheeting down and fill the hole
again, Bender said.
'qA/e patched 114
holes with one truck
today, 86 with
another, and one truck
came in earlier after
patching 60-some.
That compares to 28
potholes, and that's
for a crew that really
works hard."
- Don Bender,
City of San Diego
The purchase of spray injection trucks was
part ofa depamnent reorganization to achieve
greater efficiency and better customer ser-
vice, Bender said. The number of patch
crews was reduced from ten to six, with the
remaining people switching to other projects
in the street department. The goal for the
pothole patching unit is to respond to every
complaint call about a pothole within
24 hours. Although the goal has been impos-
sible to achieve during winter storms
because the department receives 125 to 150
calls per day. it should be achievable when
calls return to a normal level of 10 to 25 per
day, Bender said. "Now everybody's com-
fortable with the trucks and we're really
happy with them," he said.
Dealers in California
Rosco Manufacturing now has three dealers
in California. The sale to the city of San
Diego was the first big success for dealer
Hawthorne Machinery in .two years of
marketing the trucks, according to the firm' s
sales manager Terry Mueller. Another
South Dakota-based company that manu-
factures trucks for spray injection has also
intensified its California marketing efforts
in ~he last two years. Wildcat Manufacturing
Co. of Freeman, S.D., has been placing test
-patches and is attempting to sell its first
Roadpatchcr truck in the state, according to
Tim O'Hara, western U.S. territory
manager.
Older trailer-mounted spray :injection
machines (manufactured by AMZ Magnum
in the 1980s) are owned by the cities of Mill
Valley and Long Beach, and the county of
Santa Cruz, according to Tennessee-based
AMZ Magnum. Lassen County is the fast
county in California to purchase a Dura
Pateher unit from Empire Equipment in
Sacramento, which became northern Cali-
fornia dealer for the Dura Pateher about a
year ago. In an effort to make more sales,
Empire has been renting the machines to
municipalities for periods as short as a few
months. A private homeowners association
in Kern County recently purchased an AMZ
Magnum unit, and Mariposa County intends
to purchase a trailer-mounted unit because
of successful test patches and its discussions
with the Kern County group.
Most supervisors of road maintenance op-
erations in California apparently remain
skeptical about the value of spray injection
machines. Several said they had seen the
equipment demonstrated and were not that
impressed. Others have pothole repair pro-
grams that work fine despite lean budgets,
and see no need to purchase expensive new
machinery.i~
No. 49 APRIL 1995 5
ITEM
17
APPROVAL ~
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFIC R
CITY MANAGE
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Council
FROM:
Mary Jane McLarney, Assistant City Manager
DATE: May 23, 1995
SUBJECT: Temecula Employee Apprenticeship Medel (T.E.A.M'-) Program
PREPARED BY: Grant M. Yates, Human Resources Administrator
RECOMMENDATION:
For City Council to receive this report and provide staff direction.
BACKGROUND:
Mayor Jeff Stone has proposed a program that he refers to as T.E.A.M. or Temecula Employee
Apprenticeship Model. This program is intended to assist area businesses by developing a
local job training program. The T.E.A.M. Program will provide employment training
opportunities to local high school students through classes and on-the-job training
opportunities. Local businesses will help develop the T.E.A.M. program curriculum. This
involvement, at the early stage, will ensure that the businesses will be able to select from a
pool of qualified workers.
Staff has been working with Jay Hoffman, Assistant Superintendent at Temecula Valley
Unified School District, to develop a program which is fully integrated with the school
system's required educational components. Attached is an outline which explains the
proposed components and implementation periods.
The following represents the seven (7) steps in the process which will move us from the
current one-day shadowing program to the final step of a full apprenticeship program and
possible future employment.
R:~J,4&~A~rA!~17ssm
I One-day Job Shadow (Rotary
Program)
2 Extensive Job Shadow
3
Offer above more than I time
per year
4
Career Academy
5 Internship
6
Apprenticeship Program
ISSUES
Currently in place, program only
offered once each year.
Would require Application and
Selection process. Participant
required to prepare a report to school
detailing experience.
Would allow more participation and
exposure to both students and
businesses.
School offered as workskill
identification and training program.
Non-Paid volunteer program
(students compete), to allow
Students opportunity to work in
business for a specific period.
Students compete and are selected
based on business needs and
student's skill and desire.
7 Full Employment Final step
We believe that the above model, coupled with the school district's proposed program, will
provide the best possibility of succeeding with both the business community and the
school(s). It is also important to note that this is a flexible model and it is not necessary for
either a student or a business to move step by step through the model. An example is where
BWIP has hired two (2) apprentices to work in their tool crib. When these students graduate,
they will have an excellent chance to get a full-time job with BWIP.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The first year City contribution is $9,615. The second year totals el 4,375. However, many
of these costs are soft costs, (i.e. cost of operating the City van) and do not require direct
expenditures; therefore, the actual cost for the first year is $7,815 and is included in various
line items in the FY 1995-96 operating budget.
Attachment - Transition Program
t~8"<s
ITEM
18
APPROVAL ~
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICE
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
Chief of Police Peter Labahn
May 23, 1995
Approval of Joint Traffic Safety Program (Operation SCAIR)
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 95-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING AN AGREEMENT TO PARTICIPATE IN
A JOINT TRAFFIC SAFETY PROJECT WITH THE CALIFORNIA
HIGHWAY PATROL, THE RIVERSIDE SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT
AND OTHER SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY LAW
ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES
BACKGROUND: In an attempt to enhance traffic safety within Southwest Riverside
County, the California Highway Patrol has secured a Federal Grant based upon a proposed
traffic safety program known as Operation SCAIR. SCAIR is an acronym for South County
Accident and Injury Reduction. Operation SCAIR will be funded entirely by the grant monies
and will not adversely affect normal deployment of police personnel.
Local law enforcement agencies, including the Temecula Police Department recognize the
importance of addressing the issue of traffic safety, as well as the importance of apprehending
intoxicated drivers, citing motorists who have violated laws which cause accidents and
enforcing laws that reduce fatalities, such as seat belt and helmet laws.
The program is a coordinated effort between the CHP, Temecula Police Department, Murrieta
Police Department and Lake Elsinora Police Department. During the period of July 1, 1995
and June 30, 1996, the participating departments will conduct 28 DUI checkpoints and
provide additional roving patrols within the participating agency's jurisdictions. During this
period of time, the City of Tamecula will host seven (7) checkpoints. During our checkpoint
operation, the other agencies will provide additional roving patrols within the City.
Agenda Report - Operation SCAIR
May 23, 1995
Page 2
This program is viewed as a positive step towards reducing the number of DUI related traffic
collisions and will assist in the effort to reduce the number and severity of injuries sustained
in traffic collisions. The Temecula Police Department is fully supportive of this program and
appreciates the California Highway Patrol for including us in their grant program.
FISCAL IMPACT: None
JD/jsg
RESOLUTION NO. 9~-
A ~.,.qOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING AN AGR.EEV~F TO
PARTICIPATE IN A JOINT TRAFFIC SAFETY PRO~_,CT
WITH THE CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL, ~
RIVERSIDE SIIERIr'FS DEPARTMENT AND OTHER
SOUIHWESTRIVERSIDE COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT
AGENCIF.~
THE C1TY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE,
DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOUDWS:
WHs~KEAS, the California Highway Patrol (CHP) is an operating department within the
Business, Tra~on, and Housing Agency having authority and: responsibilities established
in the California Vehicle Code; and
WIIERF_AS, the overall purpose of the DetmrUnent, as a principal criminal justice
agency is to ensure safety, security and service to the public through accident prevention,
emergency incident/traffic management, law enforcement, assistance to other public agencies and
to maximize service to the public in need of aid or information; and
WHKUEAS, between 1986 and 1993, the southwest portion of Riverside County,
Temecula Valley, has grown by approximately 302 percent; and
~, along with the population growth the infrastructure consisting of freeways,
city streets, and county highways has also grown, bringing an increase in fatalities and injuries
resulting from traffic accidents; and
WItERF~AS, law enforcement agencies in the area consisting of the CHP, Riverside
County Sheriff's Depamnent, Temecula Police Department, Murrieta Police Department and
~ ~lr~ Elsinore Police Department wish to cooperate in a program funded by a Federal Grant to
address Waffic safety with major emphasis on (DUI) enforcement; and
WHEREAS, the City of Temecula, desires to participate in this pwgram;
NOW, ~]]ERF_,FORE, BE 1T RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of TemecuL_a.
as follows:
Section 1. The City approves the filing of a standard agreement with the California
Highway Patrol.
Section 2. The City authorizes the Chief of Police to execute the necessary agreements
for ~dministration of the traffic safety program.
Re, m~XlO~ ' I
Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of the Resolution.
PASSE!}, APPROVEB AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula
at a regular meeting held on the 23rd day of May, 1995.
ATTEST:
Jeff Stone, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE)SS
CITY OF TEMEC~)
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that
Resolution No. 95- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a re~fi~r meeting thereof held on the 23rd day of May, 199~, by the following
vote:
AYES:
NOF_~:
COUNCILlV~-MBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMPMBERS:
lune S. Greek, City Clerk
ITEM 19
ITEM 20
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
City Clerk
May 23, 1995
Consideration of Street Naming Program
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Approve in concept, a policy to allow the American Cancer Society the
opportunity to auction a city street name as a fund raising project.
2. Direct staff to formalize the necessary policy and procedures to implement this
program.
BACKGROUND: Mayor Stone has been contacted by the American Cancer Society
regarding the possibility of holding a fund raising auction that would give people the
opportunity to bid on a personalized street name. The Cancer Society would like to offer this
as an auction item at their annual fund-raiser on June 3, 1995.
Staff recommends approval in concept of the program to allow the idea to be used at
the June 3rd American Cancer Society event with direction to staff to formalize the method
by which this may be applied for in the future.
ATTACHMENTS: Letter of request dated April 28, 1995
RECEIVED
1995
CITY MANAGER
April28,1995
Mayor Jeff Stone
43 174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California 92590
Dear Mayor Stone,
I am the Vice President of The Temeeula/Murrieta Branch of the American Cancer
Society. As you know we are always seeking ways of fundraising. I have spoken to Tony
Elmo about a great idea that is happening in other western Riverside County cities to help
charities such as ours. At our annual fund-raiser on June 3, we will have an auction, at
this auction I would like people to be able to bid on a street name. All proceeds will go to
the American Cancer Society for this local branch. Other charities have made a handsome
profits by having people naming a stree~ after themselves. I think this is an innovative way
that the city can work with the American Cancer Society in helping with this unique fund-
raiser.
Thank you for your consideration of this projeCt. I look forward to hearing from you
soon. You may contact me at Diversified Temporary Services Inc., 41877 Enterprise
Circle N. #100 Temeeula, CA 92590, 676-8077.
Sincerely,
Bonnie L. Renz-Hanna
Chair "Mardi Gras Style, Night of Caring"
DEPARTMENTAL
REPORTS
APPROVAL:~~'
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Council/City Manager
Anthony Elmo, Chief Building Official
May 23, 1995
Building and Safety April, 1995, Activity Report
RECOMMENDATION:
Receive and file.
DISCUSSION:
The following is a summary of activity for April, 1995.
Building Permits Issued .....................................238
Building Valuation ................................... $15,041,872
Revenue Collected .................................... $133,548
Housing Starts ........................................... 120
New Commercial Starts .......................... I = 40,000 Sq. Ft.
Commercial Additions/Alterations .................. 16 = 49,930 Sq. Ft.
Building Inspections ...................................... 1,752
Agenda Repo~
May 23, 1995
Page 2
Code Enforcement Actions ................................... 605
Active Cases Pending ....................................... 50
Closed Cases ........................... ................... 9
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Josel~h Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
May 23, 1995
Public Works Monthly Activity Report'
RECOMMENDATION:
Attached for City Council's review and filing is the Department of Public Works' Monthly
Activity Reports for Al~ril, 1995.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Monthly Activity Report
MAY, 1995
Submitted by: Joseph Kicak:
Prepared by:
Date:
I. WORK UNDER CONSTRUCTION:
1. Pala Community Park:
Construction is expected to be completed by the end of May, 1995 and the
maintenance period is expected to be completed by the end of August, 1995. The
bardscape, building, and utility substructure are complete. The majority of the work.
remaining consists of landscaping the park and installing the site amenities such as
barbecues, benches and fencing.
2. Traffic Signal nt Winchester Road (HWY. 79N) & Nicolns Road:
This project is completed except for some minor punch list items. Once these items
are taken care of by the contractor, staff will recommend the acceptance of this
project to City Council. This project provided an interim three-way traffic signal to
provide traffic control until the ultimate improvements in this area can be constructed.
3. Traffic Signal & Vehicle Pre-Fmption Installation:
This project is complete except for the delivery of additional pre-emption emitters.
Once the emitters are delivered, staff will recommend the acceptance of this project
to City Council. This project consisted of installing pre-emption equipment at four
signalized intersections and nine emergency vehicles.
4. Pala Road/Route 79S Interim Improvements:
This project is complete and staff will recommend the acceptance at the next City
Council meeting. This project provided an exclusive right turn lane for east bound
traffic on Highway 79 South onto Pala Road.
5. Winchester Road Interim Ramn Iml)rovements:
The contractor has completed the relocations of the traffic signal poles and has
installed the curb & gutter on both sides of Winchester Road. The base material,
pavement, striping, and traffic loops should be completed this week, Winchester Road
is scheduled to be opened to its ultimate width on May 19th. The project will consist
of widening both the south and north sides of Winchester Road between Jefferson
Avenue and the I-15 south bound ramps.
pwO4~rpt~p~gb'~ney.mer 0511 1
Monthly Activity Report
May 12, 1995
Pages 2
6. Traffic Signal at Margarita Road & Avenidx Berc-:
This project is complete and staff will recommend the acceptance of this project at the
next City Council meeting. This project is Federally funded and consists of the
installation of a fully actuated traffic signal, signing and striping at the intersection of
Margarita Road and Avenida Barca.
7. Moraga Road Street Widenins:
A pre-construction meeting was held on May 8, 1995 and the contractor is expected
to start work on May 15, 1995. This project includes the widening and restriping of
Moraga Road between Margarlta Road and Rancho California Road, extending the two
double box culverts an outlet structure, channel grading and landscaping.
8. SDorts Park Parking end Skate Board Park:
A Contractor has been selected and Construction is expected to begin by the middle
of June, 1995 and be completed by December, 1995. The improvements include
grading, installation of irrigation, landscaping, roller hockey rink, skateboard park,
sidewalk, rest room facility and parking lot.
I!. WORK IN DESIGN
1. I-15/Winchester Road Interchange Modifications:
The Project Report was approved by Caltrans on January 25, 1995. The plans and
specifications have been signed by Caltrans. The City has retained the services of the
Riverside County Real Property Branch to assist in the acquisition of right-of-way.
Two (2) sections of property must be acquired for construction of the loop on-ramp.
The project is on schedule for bid advertisement as soon as the property has been
acquired.
2. Walcott Corridor:
The third plan check has been returned to the consultant for corrections. The pla~s
are expected to be resubmitted to the city by the end of this month. The letters for
permission to grade and the easement documents for the acquisition of right-of-way
have been sent to the adjacent property owners. The project will provide for two (2)
travel lanes (total of 32' of pavement width) within the 66' wide dedicated right-of-
way. The alignment will follow the existing right-of-way and accommodate a 30-mph
design speed. The total length of the project is approximately 8,500 feet. This
project will also include the relocation of Rancho California Water District's existing
water main.
pwO4~oUl~D~Sb'~may.mar 06/11 )95
Monthly Acbrvffy Report
May 12., 1995
Pa~Ze 3
3. Sam Hicks Monument Perk Improvement Project:
The City has received approval from the Riverside County EDA to solicit construction
bids. The bid opening will be scheduled for the end of July, 1995. The construction
activities are to be coordinated with the construction of the museum and church
renovation projects. The improvements include the construction of a 950 square foot
concession stand and rest room facility, an asphalt parking lot, landscaping and
irrigation improvements, and assorted park site amenities.
4. P,,ncho Vista Road and Mira I omn r~rive Sidewalk Imnrovements:
The design for this project is completed and staff will recommend that the City Council.
authorize the Public Works Department to solicit public construction bids at the May-
23, 1995 Council Meeting. This project is funded from Senate Bill 821 funds for
Fiscal Year 1994-95. The project consists of the installation of approximately 14,600
square feet of sidewalk on the northerly side of Rancho Vista Road between Mira
Loma Drive and Santa Suzanne Drive, the easterly side of Mira Loma Drive between
Rancho Vista Road and Santa Cecilia Drive, and the southerly side of Rancho Vista
Road east of Avenida de la Reina.
5. Solane Way Storm Drain Iml)rovements - RFP No. ~6:
Albert A. Webb Associates has been selected to provide design engineering services
for the Solana Way storm drain improvements (Ynez Road to Acacia Park Resort
Apartments). The improvements to be constructed include, but not limited to,
grading, 78" main line storm drain, utility relocations, misc. structures, erosion control,
and traffic control. The consultant will be submitting the plans and specifications for
review on Monday, May 15, 1995.
6. I-1 51Rancho California Road Interchanae Modifications:
The project plans and specifications are approximately 80% complete and will be
resubmitted to Caltrans after the consultant completes the plans for the northbound
off-ramp using the option which includes a 2:1 slope design and the purchase of
additional right-of-way.
7. I-151Overland Drive Overcroseino Imorovements:
The Project Report and Project Study Report have been reviewed and approved by
Caitrans. The plans and specifications were submitted to Caltrans for final review on
Friday, January 13, 1995 and comments should be returned to the consultant by the
end of May. The structural plans have been submitted to Caltrans (Division of
Structures) on Friday, January 6, 1995 for review and comments have been sent to
J.F. Davidson's structural engineer for incorporation into the plans. The consultant
is preparing the legal plats and descriptions of the properties that need to be acquired.
pwO4~K~mT~aip~gb'~ney.mer 0611 1/95
Monthly Activity Report
May 12, 1995
Pa,qe 4
8. Temecula Middle School lighting PrOject:
A professional services contract was awarded to Dream Engineering, Inc. to prepare
the plans and technical specifications for the sports field lighting at the Temecula
Middle School. The engineer has received comments from the State Architect's Office
and will revise the plans before submitting them to the City. The plans and
specifications are expected to be ready for the solicitation of bids by the end of May,
1995.
9. Fmergencv Generator:
A professional services contract was awarded to RWR Pascoe to prepare the plans
and technical specifications for the emergency generator to be constructed at the:
Community Recreation Center. The engineer is expected to return the plans and
specifications by the end of May for second plan check.
10. Access Ramns:
The design for this project is completed and staff will recommend that the City Council
authorize the Public Works Department to solicit public construction bids at the May
23, 1995 Council Meeting. This project is funded from Community Development
Block Grant (CDBG) funds and will modify 23 concrete handicap access ramps at
various locations throughout the City to comply with the most recent Americans with
Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements.
pwO4Vnoaet;t~p~gS%may.mar OSll I
LAND DEVELOPMENT
Monthly Activity Report
Special Projects
April, 1995
Submitted by: Joseph Kink
Prepared by: Raymond A. Casey
Date: May 8, 1995
FEMA/OES REIMBURSEMENT:
Staff is continuing to coordinate with the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and the
State Office of Emergency Services (OES) representatives in seeking reimbursement for costs
incurred by the City due to the January 1993 floods and ensuing disaster declaration. OES has
reimbursed the City a total of ~952,832 to date. The total cumulative reimbursable amount is
$1,080,996.
Staff has also been coordinating with FEMA and OES in seeking reimbursement for costs incurred
by the City due to the recent floods of January - March 1995. The total reimbursable amount being
supported by the FEMA/OES field team is $175,863.59 for the Phase I disaster. Staff has also
applied for over $140,000 in funding associated with the Phase II disaster.
PARKVIEW SITE (PROJECT NO. PW93-09h
Rough Grading construction is anticipated to begin toward the beginning of June 1995 and
completed in early July 1995.
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 159 {AD 159):
The AD 159 improvements, as listed, are at the following stages of construction:
Temecula Creek is complete.
Approval of Highway 79 South plans from Caltrans is expected in mid-June. Phase I
construction (from Butterfield Stage Road to Avertida de Missions) is scheduled to begin on
December 1995.
The selection process for Pala Road's Request For Proposal for environmental consulting is
complete. :
Butterfield Stage Road/Nighthawk Pass is nearly complete.
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 161 (AD 1 61 ):
Winchester Road (Area II) - estimated completion date is January 1996
Murrieta Hot Springs Road (West) - estimated completion date is mid-August 1995. ~"
.;ALLE PINA COLADA BYPASS {PROJECT NO.94-16):
The study has been forwarded to Metropolitan Water District (MWD) for their review. Staff has
received comments from MWD and met with representatives to discuss the project.
OLD TOWN ENTERTAINMFNT PROJFCT:
The following engineering design/study projects associated with the Old Town Redevelopment
Project are currently underway.
RFP#27 - Phase I Western Bypass Corridor. The preliminary research portion of the project
has been completed and Trans-Pacific Consultants, Inc. (TPC) is currently analyzing the
alignment alternatives.
RFP#28 - First Street Extension. The conceptual alignment is complete however, alternative
bridge structures/types are undergoing review. The review includes a feasibility analysis of
the construction costs and schedules.
RFP#30 - Old Town Parking Study. The parking/circulation study is complete and will be
incorporated into the Old Town Redevelopment Project and Westside Specific Plan.
RFP#32 - Western Bypass Corridor Assessment District. The scope of the assessment
district will be defined once the extent of the improvements associated with Phase I of the
Western Bypass Corridor has been determined. At that time the recommended consultant
will be presented to the City Council.
The Old Town Redevelopment Project Environmental Impact Report and the Westside Specific Plan
are scheduled for the May 15, 1995 Planning Commission public hearing.
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
MEMORANDUM
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
Bred Buron, Maintenance Superintendent
May 1, 1995
Monthly Activity Report - April 1995
The following activities were performed by Public Works Department, Street Maintenance Division
in-house personnel for the month of April 1995:
I. SIGNS
II.
III.
IV.
VI.
A. Total signs replaced
B. Total signs installed
C. Total signs repaired
TREES
A. Total trees trimmed for sight distance and street
sweeping concerns
POTHOLES
A. Total square feet of potholes repaired
CATCH BASINS
A. Total catch basins cleaned
RIGHT-OF-WAY WEED ABATEMENT
A. Total square footage for right-of-way abatement
GRAFFITI REMOVAL
A. Total locations
B. Total S.F.
STENCILING
A. 117 new and repaintad legends
B. 430 L.F. of red curb new and repaintad
C. 1,792 S.F. of sandblasting/grinding
VII.
5
8
12
49
826
138
84,900
-'20
3,932
MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT - April 1995
Page No. 2
Also, City Maintenance staff responded to 16 service order requests ranging from weed abatement,
tree trimming, sign repair, A.C. failures, litter removal, and catch basin cleanings.
This is compared to 22 service order requests for the month of March, 1995.
The Maintenance Crew has also put in 31 hours of overtime which includes standby time, P.M.
surveillance (weekends only), and ,response to street emergencies.
I.P.S. STRIPINn AND STs-"NCILINn COMPANY has comoleted the foliowine:
· 72,292 L.F. of new and repainted striping
· 0 L.F, of sand blasting
The total cost for I.P.S. striping services was $5,784.16 compared to $0.00 for March, 1995.
PESTMASTER SERVIC;:S has comoleted the following:
· 75 sites, 1,167,337 S.F. of right-of-way weed control, total cost $16,050.88 compared ,,,
$10,203.78 for March, 1995.
The total cost for Street Maintenance performed by Contractors for the month of April, 1995 was
$45,420.70 compared to $79,206.60for the month of March, 1995.
Account No. 5402
Account No. 5401
$45,420.70
$0.00
CC:
Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects
Raymond A. Casey, Principal Engineer - Land Development
Martin C. Lauber, Traffic Engineer
r:~ade~eUpt%95%04 q
MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT - April 1995
Page No. 3
STREET MAINTENANCE CONTRACTORS
The following contractors have performed the following projects for the month of April.
Ar-Cnl INT NO. 540:~
MONTELEONE EXCAVATING: '... ~." ':
DATE
4/21/95
04/13/95
04113/95
04/13/95
04/06/95
04/13/95
04/07/95
04/13/95
04/13/95
04/10/95
04/10/95
04/11/95
04105/95
04/11/95
04/11/95
04~06/95
04110/9 5
STREETIC HANNEIJBRI DG E
John Warnet, Santiago,
Liefar Walcott
Pina Colads
North General Kearney
Del Rey Road
Margarita Road
Diaz Road Closure
Rancho California Road
Rancho Vista Road
Del Rio
Pala Road
Wolf Lane
Calla Chapos
El Lucero/Jedediah Smith
Margarita Road
La Paz Road
Pauba Road
Santiago RoadlC Street
DESCRIPTION OF WORK
Various Blade Work
Backfill
Backfill
Backfill
Backfill
Backfill
Shoulder Grade
Backfill
Backfill erosion
Backfill
Backfill
Backfill
Backfill
Backfill
Backfill
Backfill
Remove curb and gutter
TOTALCOST
~672.00
$1,231.75
$307.75
$431.00
$493.00
$307.75
$246.50
~965.50
$677.50
$869.50
$1,417.00
$369.00
$1,478.25
$592.25
$215.50
$254.75
$1,652.66
r:%roade%a~t;t~gb'~04 ekg
MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT - April 1995
Page No. 4
DATE
04/09/95
04/26/95
NELSON PAVING ' ' ·
STREET/CHANNEL/BRIDGE
Rancho Vista Road
31010 Pescado Drive
43195 Business Park Drive
DESCRIPTION OF WORK
Remove and Replace
Total A.C. - 50 Tons
Total S.F. - 2,952
Remove & Replace Asphalt Pad
Total A.C. - 18 Tons-'
Total S.F. - 1,016
TOTAL COST
e6,453,00
$3,285.00
CAUFORNIA'LANDSCAPECO. ""
DATE STREET/CHANNEI:/BRIDGE
04/28/95 Santiago Road
MURRIETA DEVELOPMENT CO.
DATE STREET/CHANNEL/BRIDGE
04/27/95
DESCRIPTION OF WORK
Weed abatement/remove debris
DESCRIPTION OF WORK
Form and pour trapezoidal channel
Total S.F. - 260
TOTALCOST
$444.00
TOTALCOST
$1,222,00
r:%roede~ctrpt~gSM)4 ekg
DATE'
04-04-95
04-05-95
04-06-95
04-10-95
04-10-95
04-13-95
04-13-95
04-14-95
04-14-95
04-14-95
04-14-95
04-17-95
04-21-95
04-21-95
04-21-95
04-26-95
04-28-95
04-28-95
04-28-95
04-28-95
....:,..
· :";: LOCATION
Tower Plaza
Winchester Road ~ I-15
30460 Shenandoah Court
Ave. de la Reins {b Calla Aragon
Main Street ~ Bridge
Camino Verde ~ Camino del Este
Rustic Glen Sidewalk
28120 Front Street
2723 Madison
Bank of Commerce ~) Front Street
28120 From Street
Camino Verde @ Camino del Este
Santa Gertrudis Channel
Main Street Bridge
Rancho California Road
@ Target Center
Southern Cross' ~ Rancho Vista
28485 6th Street
Little Flower Pre-School
6th ~ Pujol
28496 Pujol
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
GRAFFITI REMOVAL - APRIL, 1995
· ,: · .. .; ~.~' '. ,.
IRemoved
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Covered
San Blasted
Removed
IRemoved
IRemoved
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
'WORK COMPLETED: i',, :. ,": ': ,," i':'
80' S.F. of Graffiti
15 S.F. of Graffiti
100 S.F. of Graffiti
2 S.F. of Graffiti
:5 S.F. of Graffiti
315 S.F. of Graffiti
35 S.F. of Graffiti
38 S.F. of Graffiti
96 S.F. of Graffiti
75 S.F. of Graffiti
2,000 S.F. of Greffiti
24 S.F. of Graffiti
220 S.F. of Graffiti
662 S.F. of Graffiti
10 S.F. of Greffiti
10 S.F. of GrafWci
75 S.F. of Graffiti
100 S.F. of Greffiti
60 S.F. of Graf~t.i
10 S.F. of Graffiti
TOTAL
LOCATIONS
I TOTAL S.F.
I
DATE
04-06-95
04-06-95
04-07-95
04-07-95
04-10-95
04-10-95
/J}4-.13-95
~-13-95
04-20-95
04-25-95
04-26-95
04-26-95
LOCATION
Calla Pins Coleda
Calle Pins Coleda
~) N, Gen'l Kearney
Pale Road ID) Hen/, 79 South
Pale Road 0 Hwy. 79 South
Corta Anza () Calla Aragon
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
WORK COMPLETED-APRIL, 1995
SIGNS/INSTALLED/MAINTAINED
Replaced
Replaced
Avenida de le Reins
Ave. Barca 0 Margarita Road
Hwy. 79 North (51) Nicolee Road
Pale Road N/O Loma Linda
Via Gilberto ~) Pashaho
Via Norte E/O Ave. Centenario
Del Ray ~i) Ave. del Reposo
WORK COMPLETED
10 Foot Barricade
'N" Marker "Graffiti"
Replaced
Removed
Installed
Maintained
Removal
Removal
Installed
Replaced
Repaired
Repaired
S.N.S. i R-1
C.!.P. Signs (2)
SPS/S.N.S. R-1
(Loose Round Post)
Emergency Access
R-1 (2) New Signals
R-1 S.N.S. (1) New Signal
2 W-17 2 R-1 4 R-1-A
R-1 & S.N.S.
2 R-2-35 W-7
R-2-35 R-26
5 TOTAL SIGNS
REPLACED
8 TOTAL SIGNS
INST/q I R~
1 · TOTAL SIGNS
REPNRED
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
WORK COMPETED
APRIL, 1995
DEBRIS REMOVAL
DATE
04-11-95
04-11-95
04-11-95
04-11-95
04-11-95
04-11-95
04-11-95
04-11-95
04-11-95 ·
04-11-95
04-11-95
04-11-95
04-12-95
Diaz NIO Winchester Road
Business Park Drive
Front Street ~ 6th Street
Jedediah Smith @ Cabrillo
Jedediah Smith @ De Portola
De Portola ~ Del Sur
De Portola ~ Margarita
Jedediah Smith @ Pescado
Calla Valado W/O Pescado
Ynez Street @ Santiago
Ynez Street @ Rancho Vista Road
Rancho Vista Road
Margarita Road
Front Street N/O 5th Street
Sand
Removal
Rocks in
flowline
Sand on
S.W.
Sand in
flowline
Sand in
flowline
Sand in
flowline
Sand in
flowline
Sand in
flowline
Sand in
R.W.
Sand in
SW/RAC
Sand on
SW/RAC
Sand on
SW/RAC
Sand on
Sidewalk
. WORK COMPLETED '.~'
2 yards
114 yard
I yard
I 1/2 yards
I 112 yards
314 yard
20 yards (3 locations)
1/2 yard
114 yard
I cubic yard
-1- pwO3%roadettwkenltSlO4,1)EBRIS 060296
)>=RRIS REMOVAL- APRIL, 1995
04-13-95
Via Los Colima @ Rancho
California Road
Sand in
flowline
3 cubic yard
04-13-95
04-13-95
04-13-95
04-13-95
From Street ~ Texaco
Vallejo Avenue ~ Ynez Road
Margarita Road E/O Post Office
Rancho Vista Road EIO Margarita
Road
Sand in
SW
Sand in
flowline
Sand on
SW
Sand on
S.W.
1,250
1/4
2
5
S.F.
yard
yards
yards
04-13-95
04-13-95
Rancho Vista W/O Southern Cross
Lyndie Lane W/O Margarita
Sand in
flowline
Erosion
1/4
yard
3 yards (filled)
-2- pwO3~woads%wkomplM~5%O4.DEBRIS 060296
DATE
04-03-95
04-03-95
04-03-95
04-05-95
04-06-95
04-10-95
04-11-95
04-12-95
Area 2
Area 3
Area 4
Area 2
Area 2
Area 2
Area 2
Area 2
LOCATION
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
WORK COMPLETED - APRIL, 1995
PAINTING/STENCILING
Stop Bar 2
Stop Legend 2
Stop Bar 4
Stop Legend 6
Stop Bar 3
Stop Legend 3
Stop Bar 3
Stop Legend 3
Stop Bar 6
Stop Legend 6
Stop Bar 9
Stop Legend 9
Stop Bar 8
Stop Legend 13
Stop Bar 2
Stop Legend 7 -
WORK COMPLETED"
90 SF Grinding
X-Walk 1
225 SF Grinding
45 SF Grinding
140 SF Grinding Arrow 2 45 2
25 2
270 SF Grinding
225 SF Grinding "35" I
360SF Grinding
212 SF Grinding DIP 2
X-Walk I
04-20-95
04-24-95
04-25-95
04-27-95
Pala Road @ Loma Linda
Area 2
Vigo Court @ Southern Cross
Area 2
Installed
Grind & repainted
Grind & repainted
Repainted
8 Legends
10 Legends
180SF Grinding
2 Legends
45SF Grinding
430 L.F. of red curb
TOTAL NEW AND
REPAINTED
STENCILS
TOTAL L.F.NEW
AND REPAINTED
RED CURB
TOTAL S.F. OF
GRINDING/
SANDBLASTING
117 :
1.79~
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
WORK COMPLETED
APRIL, 1995
CA TCH BASINS
DATE
04-17-95
04-18-95
04-19-95
04-24-95
LOCATION' ':' I :" ":~::~""'j'WORK COMPLETED
Areas 81,82, 83 & 84.
Areas 81,82, 83 & 84
Areas 81,82, 83 & 84
Santiago ~) S. Warner
I Cleaned
I Cleaned
i Cleaned
Cleaned
37 Catch Basins
84 Catch Basins
15 Catch Basins
2 Catch Basins
TOTAL
;ATCH
3ASIN$
;LEANED
138
-1- pwO3Voed$~wb=mpitd~b"104.C8 060196
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
WORK COMPLETED - APRIL, 1995
R.O.W. WEED ABATEMENT
DATE
04-03-95
04-03-95
04-06-95
04-07-95 I
04-12-95
04-21-95
04-27-95
04-27-95
04-27-95
04-28-95
LOCATION. I" '<'::" :''!':'''
Via Lobo ~) Channel Abated
Via Lobo Westside Abated
Pina Colada ~) N, Abated
General Kearney
Via Lobo Channel I Abated
From Street Abated
NIO 6th Street
Rancho California Road Abated
W/O Park Drive
From Street SIO Abated
Rancho California Road
From Street @ Abated
6th Street
Main Street Bridge Abated
6th Street ~ Abated
.'.:.= '.W~)hK'COMPLET~D'
3,000
14,000
200
50
:3,000
750
60,000
3,000
400
500
S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds
S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds
S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds
S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds
S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds
S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds
S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds
S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds
S.F. of R.O.W. Weet,.~.i
S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds
84.900 TOTAL S.F.R.O.W.
WEED ABATEMENT
-1- p/OSVosd,%wbnq~bSW.S~O4.Wsd, OS01~
DATE
04-06-95
04-10-95
04-19-95
04-20-95
04-21-95
04-24-95
/-0.4-24-95
. ,-24-95
04-24-95
04-25-95
04-25-95
04-25-95
04-25-95
04-26-95
04-27-95
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
LOCATION
ROADS DIVISION
TREE TRIMMING
APRIL, 1995
,;~ .... ~ ,. ~ "'
Pine Colads ~) N, General Kearney
6th Street ~ Pujol Street
Pujol Street N/O 6th Street
Pala Road N/O Loma Linda
Rancho California Road
W/O Park Drive
40751 Carmelita Circle
30355, 30410 & 30380 Del Rey
Medusa ~) La Serena
Camino Romo
Bay Hill ~ Olympic
Bay Hill (i) Clubhouse
Consuelo @Pala Road
San Fermin Race @ Margarita
Rancho Vista & El Greco
Margarita Road N/O La Serene
": · :WORK COMPLETED
Row Sight Diet.
OH R.O,W.
Trimmed
OH R,O,W,
Trimmed
Trimmed
Trimmed
Trimmed
Trimmed
Trimmed
Trimmed
Trimmed
Trimmed
Trimmed
Trimmed
Trimmed
Trimmed
5 Trees
2 Trees
7 Trees
6 Trees
1 Tree
3 Trees
5 Trees
I Tree
2 Trees
2 Trees
4 Trees
I Tree
I Tree
2 Trees
7 Trees
d
TOTAL
TREES
TRIMMED
49
TRAFFIC DIVISION
Monthly Activity Report
For April, 1995
Submitted by: Joseph Kicak~-~
Prepared by: Marry Lauber
Date: May 15, 1995
I. TRAFFIC REnUESTS
TRAFFIC 'REQUESTS: Feb. March April
Received 9 4 3
Completed 5 3 0
Under Investigation 8 10 17
Scheduled for Traffic Commission I 3 2
II.
DIVISION PROJECTS:
The Traffic Division has completed the first step in the refinements to the
Southwest Area Planning District (SWAPD) Travel Forecast Model. The
updated model will be used for the I-15/I-215 Corridor Study and could be used
to predict land usa change traffic impacts.
Traffic Division staff, and a representative from Temecula Community Services
District (TCSD), have invited Caltrans Highway Operations staff to provide
advise regarding the crossing of State Route 79(N) by the Santa Gertrudis Creek
multi-purpose trail. Many alternatives were discussed on-site, with all being
ruled out except for an at-grade crossing in the trails current alignment.
Caltrans will be researching appropriate traffic controls recommended to provide
the highest level of safety for both motorized and non-motorized transportation.
Ce
The Public Works Department celebratedthe successful completion of two (2)
major traffic signal installations. The energizing of the Nicolas Road/Winchest.er
Road and Avenida Barca/Margarita Road traffic signals were a significant
accomplishment, thanks to our Capital Improvement Division.
De
The exclusive right-turn lane completed on State Route 79(S) at Pala Road, was
initiated by the Traffic Division and brought to completion by, the diligence and
team work of the Maintenance and Capital Improvement Divisions.
Ee
As part of the Public Works Department's on-going participation in the two
Assessment District projects, Traffic Division staff has reviewed roadway
marking plans and five (5) ultimate traffic signal plans for State Route 79.
c~mcup~a.drsc~5~Ol .m~r
TEMECULA COMMUNITY
SERVICES DISTRICT
ITEM 1
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
HELD MAY 9, 1995
A regular meeting of the Temecula Community Services District was called to order at 8:06
PM at the Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California.
President Ron Robarts presiding.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT: 5
ABSENT: 0
DIRECTORS: Lindemans, Mu~oz, Parks, Stone, Roberrs
DIRECTORS: None
Also present were General Manager Ronald E. Bradley, General Counsel Peter Thorson and
City Clerk June S. Greek.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None given.
CONSENT CALENDAR
It was moved by Director Parks, seconded by Director Stone to approve Consent Calendar
Item No. 1. The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 5 DIRECTORS:
NOES: 0 DIRECTORS:
ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS:
Minutes
1.1
1.2
Lindemans, Mu~oz, Parks, Stone, Roberrs
None
None
Approve the minutes of April 11, 1995.
Approve the minutes of April 25, 1995.
DISTRICT BUSINESS
Minutee.ced~OSO995
TCSD ProDosed Rates and CharQes for FY 1995-96
Director of Community Services Shawn Nelson presented the staff report.
Director Stone abstained based on his ownership of a home in Service Level R.
-1-
Sam Pratt, 40470 Brixton Cove, spoke in opposition to any increase in TCSD Rates
and Charges.
Director Stone reported that the City of Temecula has been proactive in reducing
fees for its citizens and announced that this year the REST program, (Revenue,
Excess Sharing in Temecule) will be implemented end citizens of Temecula will
receive $4.70 credited toward this year's TCSD rates and charges per household,
effectively reducing the annual increase to $1.38 for the net levy.
It was moved by Director Parks, seconded by Director Lindemans to approve staff
recommendation as follows:
2.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 95-02
**
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ON THE FILING OF A REPORT ON THE
PROPOSED RATES AND CHARGES FOR FISCAL YEAR 1995-96 AND
SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING IN CONNECTION
THEREWITH
2.2 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 95-03
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AMENDING THE PROCEDURES FOR
APPEALING THE APPLICATION OR IMPLEMENTATION OF RATES AND
CHARGES AGAINST PROPERTY WITHIN THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY
SERVICES DISTRICT
The motion was unanimously carried with Director Stone abstaining.
Namina of Park and Recreation Facilities
Director of Community Services Shawn Nelson presented the staff report.
Director Parks expressed concern that the parks named after the two Sister Cities
were small and asked if they will create a good impression to visiting dignitaries..'
President Roberts stated it is a small token of appreciation and it will be
appreciated.
Minutes.cs~l%050995 -2-
It was moved by Director Lindemans, seconded by Director Stone to approve staff
recommendation to name the two (2) quarter-acre parks on Nicolas Road "Voorburg
Park" and "Nakayama Park", the park site on Nicolas Road and North General
Kearny Road "Nicolas Road Park", the park site at De Portola and Butterfield Stage
Roads "Butterfield Stage Park" and the twenty-acre community park west of the
Temecula Elementary School "Margarita Community Park". The motion was
unanimously carried.
GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT
None given.
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT
None given.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS
None given.
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Director Lindemans, seconded by Director Parks to adjourn at 8:33 PM,
to a meeting on May 23, 1995, 8:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho
Vista Road, Temecula, California. The motion was unanimously carried.
Ron Roberts, President
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk
Minutes.cs~l%050995 -3-
ITEM 2
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROV
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFI
CITY MANAG
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
Board of Directors
Ronald E. Bradley, General Manager
May 23, 1995
Acceptance of Landscape Maintenance Areas and Residential.
Street Lighting· ..
PREPARED BY: ~
RECOMMENDATION:
Beryl Yasinosky, Management Assistant
That the Board of Directors:
Accept the deeds for the TCSD landscape maintenance areas and direct the City Clerk
to record the documents.
2. Accept Tract 22762 into the Rancho Highlands landscape maintenance rate level·
3. Accept residential street lights.
BACKGROUND: Prior to the beginning of each new fiscal year, staff reviews
applications from developers requesting to dedicate street lighting and perimeter slope areas
into the TCSD maintenance programs. The energy costs for residential street lighting are
transferred into Service Level B and perimeter landscaping and slope areas are maintained
through Service Level C.
Several developers have filed applications to dedicate perimeter slopes and landscaping into
the TCSD maintenance program beginning July 1,1995. The slope areas have been inspected
by the Maintenance Superintendent and are acceptable to TCSD standards. The attached
easement and grant deeds for the respective landscape and open space areas have been
reviewed to ensure that all legal requirements have been satisfied.
In addition, the Rancho Highlands Homeowners Association Board (HOA) has formally
requested that Tract 22762 be accepted into the existing TCSD landscape maintenance
program and rate level for their development. Tract 22762 is within the jurisdiction of the
aforementioned HOA and receives benefit from the perimeter landscaping. Inclusion of this
tract into the maintenance program also distributes the maintenance costs to a larger area,
thereby reducing the overall charge to each property owner· A copy of the HOA board
meeting minutes and subsequent request letter are attached for your review.
Therefore, the legal documents effecting the following tracts are being recommended for
acceptance and recordation:
Service m evel C
2.
3.
4.
5.
Tract 21675-0: Village Grove
Tract 22762-0: Rancho Highlands
Tracts 22916-0, 22916-1, and 22916-2: Vintage Hills
Tract 22148-0: Mirada
Tract 25004-1: Barclay Estates
Staff is also recommending the acceptance of residential street lights into TCSD Service Level
B, as follows:
Service Ievel B
1· Tract 22762-0 7. Tract 24131-1
2. Tract 22916-3 8. Tract 24131-2
3. Tract 23100-3 9. Tract 24133-0
4. Tract 23101-2 10. Tract 24135-2
5. Tract 23125-1 11. Tract 24135-2
6. Tract 23483-0
FISCAL IMPACT:
Acceptance of the slopes and street lighting will be incorporated
into the TCSD Rates and Charges for Fiscal Year 1995-96. Costs for maintaining the slope
areas will be included into Service Level C. The energy costs for residential street lighting will
be included into Service Level B.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Landscape Easement Deeds.
2. Correspondence from Rancho Highlands HOA.
c~deobi'dmdfie. ad OS2~S
March I, 1995
COMMUNITY MANAGEMENT
A division of RBCM, Inc.
Mr. Shawn Nelson
Community Services Director
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
RANCHO HIGHLANDS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION - LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE (Service Levd C)
Dear Shawu:
Please be advised that the above referenced Association has added an additional tract to the
commuajty.
Accordingly, we ere requesting that the City of Temecula include Tract 22762 as a pan of Service
Level C. I have enclosed a copy of the "Declaration of Annexation" conveying this property to
the Association. The Board of Directors will be meeting on March 16, 1995 and will ratify
acceptance at this time. A copy of the minutes from that meeting will follow shortly.
We hope this is adequate information to process this request. Should additional information be
required, please don't hesitate to contact me at (909) 699-1220.
Sincerely,
Administrative Assistant
Elite Community Management
for RANCHO HIGHLANDS COMMUNqTY ASSOCIATION
enclosure
cc: Bill Cecil, President; Board of Directors
SK/s
11717 Bernardo Plaza Ct., Suite 205
San Diego, CA 92 128
Business: (619) 485-0881 · Service: (619) 485-0672
FAX: (619) 485-7844
Business:
27710 Jefferson Ave., Suite 106
Temecula, CA 92590
(909) 699-1220 · Accounting: (909) 699-4225
FAX: (909) 699-1661
March 22, 1995
COMMUNITY MANAGEMENT
A division of RBCM, Inc.
Mr. Shawn Ndson
Community Services Dkector
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
liE: RANClIO HIGHIAN1)S COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION - TRACT 22762
Dear Shawn:
As stated in our letter of March 1, 1995 rerardizl inclusion of Tract 22762 into the above
referenced association, we have enclosed copies of the minutes from the March 16, 1995 meeting
of the Board of Directors.
Should you require additional information, as always, please don't heistate to contact our office
at (909) 699-1220.
Sincerely,
Admini-~trative Assistant
Elite Commqnjty Mana2ement
for RANCHO HIGHLANDS COMMUNITY .ASSOCIATION
enclosure
cc: fie
SK/s
11717 Bemardo Plaza Ct.,'Suite 205
San Diego, CA 92128
Business: (619) 485-0881 o Service: (619) 485-0672
FAX: (619) 485-7844
27710 Jefferson Ave., Suite 106
Temecula, CA 92590
Business: (909) 699-1220 · Accounting: (909) 6994225
FAX: (909) 699-1661
'RANCHO"mGHLANDS'
COMMU T..Y.ASSOCIATION
MEErmG:.O DmscroRs
Lampkin, sergeatit-at~iL:Michae~'V~d0r; :Anthony~h Andreola, St., and Shari
Kuwahara, Representing'Elite CommUnitY' Management; Sevet=al Homeowners.
Absent: .Candace Spenc~;. Secretary
ORDER "' '
The meeting WaS called to =order:st='6:42 p.m. by Mr. Bill Cecil, President.
The BOard,. upoRlnoti0n th~3~.:~e alld seconded, voted upnnlrnous|y to approve the minutes of '-
the February '16i =1995:'tegiila~' meeting as submitted.
FINANCIAl. REPORT :':.'
Financial Statement .Review i:!~.:' :: :!.
Mr..LeBlanc tevieweii the '~ial statement ending February 28, 1995. Account balances and
lindget. compari,~n....tep~rts. ~vere:i. reviewed. It was riotiff that the fence painting at the rec center
· had .be~n miSc0ded;"'Manag~t to code this item from structural maintenane, e to current year
disbursements...: : . ::.::...::
Ms:. Andreola .teviewed':'four'::aCeounts wl~ieh are over 90 days.
107054-I084 -iSmail clainiS:.'!~iion has been filed against this homeowner, with a court date of
~3/22/95. at ·1·:30 'p;m. 'Manag~ent requested a volunteer from the Board to appear on behalf of
the Association.' 'There .:were: n0; volunteers at this time.
107os-4,258-i...~..M~sgementii~:noted that this homeowner had been fined previously and is-
scheduled for a hearing at the ·April 20, 1995 Board of Directors' meeting.
99999-6-262-i .- Maxiagement..'-had filed for small claims action and discovered that the costs
involved to. collect against th~ .judgement previously received would come close to equalling the
current amount owed. Ilp0n':nmtion duly made and seconded, the Board voted unanimously to
write off $251:59 as uncollectible debt.
999994-34~-I -. Management rep0rt~. that .this fonner.~owner had filed bankruptc7 .and. y~e were
waiting for the discharge :before :taking ~ny. action.. :...' =.="i'..'i'.' .~.='-:: ' '=.= - ..........i..... · :::... i'. · ....-.....
hncho Highhinds' '~nmuni~y ~socittiou
Board of'.!)iFec~ors 'Meeting.
· 'Manegemen~'Report '..:.'.. '. . ....
· " · Matmgem~ nO~ed that~heSe items' W~Uldbe addreSsed.'individUali~e under old business.
· ': F~per~r ~lr~pection RQ~ort~
· . Managementideferred.this repOrtito Mr. Chichester, the Committee Chairperson to report under
the appropriate section of. the. agenda.
.... ' "' .~ This ~item. was .passed over in the int~est of time. There were no items requiring Board attention.
· ....:i: . ..:: .... ~TkrchitecturaFiC6ntrol Committee
::.=. ' .. :'.:.. :. :'..'..i..~'.: Mrs,'.:D~Ub =~q3o~t~d that the Committee had received eight applications during the last month. Six
· ".::"....!=.: ~...=!."': :.~!::~a.~ were disapproved. Mr. Hnnk VandenBrook has begun the parking inspections
:.'. := .: ..' ..' ;Mr:..~:i'a~ii .B~n~ies has resigned from the ACC. He has served since the inception of the
...... · .....commit~:'.'=b~,~='h'is business activities have made him unable to continue to participate on this
· :. 'Upoh..moti0O'..il~ily made and seconded, the Board voted unanimously to accept Mr. Barry Rehm
.. .= .to rephCe'Mt'i...'~Onavries on the AC..C.
........ ' = 'Mr~ '=.'Chi~eSter=· reviewed the latest property inspection report with the Board and members present.
'=." =There== were nO =qUestions regarding this report.
· . Nomination=C0~ttee
":"..':'...'MrS;'..SpenCe".WaS not present, so no report was given.
· :' Recreafjon 'C0tranittee
:No report .WaS"given at this time.
'OLD:BUSINESS
· .Cormramify survey Result-q/Update
Management reported .to the 'membership that 31 ..su,eys=.'h~! .been =received out of 294 ·sent·out.
Management noted that there was.no significant change fr6in'l~t month.
Lot .t6=Wrou~ht Iron/Wood F~nCing .Pil~t~'=Pain~in~'UPdate ='=.."
In the interesq.'of time,' this.item'was tabled ~m'I ~e .neXt ~.b0ard tni~ing..
-Z
Randto Highlands' CommnnitY Association
:Board of Directors Meeting
Minutes ' '
March 16, 1995
Page- 3-
· ' : =.~4~-~it,~ment Contract:Ren~a~..
· :Management had:previously pro~ided~the B0ard With a..nmv C0ntract'f~r the period March l, 1995==
through FebrUary. 29,. i996. .Upon motion duly made and Seconded, :the Board voted unanimously
to approve the new contraa at the sameper unit charge as'the previous contract. Mr. Cecil noted
to the.memberS :present~ that thereis a thirty day cancellation clause that either party may use if
it feels the other is not performing satisfactorily.
Recreation Center Gates' · =' ....
Management .prOvided the. Board with':thz~ bids 'forzthe installation=of new gates at the recreation
~.~". cente~.""rnis'.itm WaS.:~bl~::~.m~:ineXt'.board 'm~gL: '. · ::':. · .."
...... . '. '::" . .' ...... ..~' ... .: .. '. ~...-..:...::: '. :!'.:. · ":.~..:: .i:i!'.':. '.' ~'::.::.i...' :i:: '
........ S~rity":Uids.'.'. :i: ::'........ .....i.... ....
::... ::.... ...i ::: Managemeat pr0vided::the' ~ard': wi~':.~ ii~ids fot:..s~curity patrols, randomly, eight time~ an
· evening,.'friday~..:samrday, .and :SUnd~y;':betweea the"!aouts. of:.10:0o.p.m~: and dawn. Foot patrol
~voUld"be made. in .the .pool, re~i~ooms~.'tennis: courts, .anti green :ibe. tt'areas~:.::. Upon .motion ·duty
.... · . '~75'~00...Mr... Cecil directedi Management 'to i.ensure the. contract comained .a thirty day cancellation .'
·:.~lan~e. :: '.":"':- · ·· "' · """ "' .':" · ' "'
,,,--- . Z:..: . ....: .. :..: ': . . . .. Z · Z - . . ' .. · i '." · ': ' · . . . ....:. · ... ."' . Z : .
:...':.. :.:ii .:.....'~. ~.i~o~'! ~~' ':~em~ ".'~~ d~:.:~" ~f:
: .i:.'... '..i.......::devi~.whidi::inightbe.imaU~it-'t0.~U~n~tsecutitY:::Patr~s. :.'i:.:'::.:'.:~.~:.:'..:'i.~:."..~::i "..':"'· ' '
:..'.:":: :'..'. ..:. . .': ' · :. . · ': . .' '.: ... '..' '.' ..:. :. '.'~'!'! :.: .: ~'i.:'..~ .' .
"..".:" ":'.. i.: i.~'W~-~u~'.'." ' .'":' :"'"' '." .."::":": ..':' ':''.:':"": .:':::::"':::':" ' ·:'.:
:' ....' ·" "" ' ' '. '" ' :"' :." . ."'i.. :"::':."..i.:." '''
· Acceptance .of Tract 22762 ...... .. '. .....
.. .....~ uo~. upon..,,,otio,,-.dU~ymale ~' ~i~d~' ~d..,,~,iii~o~a~,' t~'.:~pt .t~a,:t 22?6~-imo
· . the .Association." " ·
.... :' ' ' .' " ~" .~i:' ."
· ,.mo~' ..:' · .. .' '.'~... .:
:' ..:election:at'?.~!p~m:":b~:-.Mr:.:"Ce~il, P~sident." :' '." .' ":':.: .::' :..~. '..:.'::....... ": i..':.'
· ' .. · . . '. ..~.~ '.' ... . ..... .: :. ' ...:. ".:.. [.. ..'...':"
· . .. 'Z!': .'. . ..... .. . ...
"" :"":~rep~ea by .... ""''
· : ......· .:.
· .~l~te Convnun~ Management
~r-~ORDZZ~TG I~Q~ BY:
FIRST ,a2vlE3flCA,~ ~ COMPANy
~ i~CORDI~D MAIL TO:
WAMCO, Inc.
do W~ Vema,e Company
.I. ST .~rrRIC~N
~002/00;
NOTICE OF A-NNEXA~O~r
I~-,EGIZALS: : ..
. ~.
· w. % covetous, c°etfions smd resuictions as~forth~aad a~l~sabjectW
· bi~rm
w
WAMCO, In&, a Nn, ada
· b/a WA~CO Real
BY: - ~~
~J --
rfS: ?~'--'~4r-~ t-
73.4 788 23S8
ELITE C~I~ITY ~IGMT
1ST AIE/IC,~ TZ'L
~003
EXI-~R_IT °A-
Lots 28 through 45 iudu,s/ve of Trac:t
~ou~h ~6 ~.M~,~_o~ orRive~d~~,~ ~l~L~p on F~ in Book 240,
C"
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTy OF
On .r/k/~/,e, ~ f/4~/,./, _, before me,_ t,4,q.~-/lt~ Z. :;z"'~'7$v,c/.4
Personally appear'e~ ,t2r, /~.,.r ¥ ."T-- .'~/,4 y;, ~,,; /r!.//.,;~.;,. ' '
( r p,ove{~ tcme on-tho ~t. si~. ~f ~atiafa~cry evid~ ~ , Personally known tO me
O C,e) to~'~Dbe
' Person(s} whose name($)-is/are
subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that~hc/sho/they executed the same
in J3iiB~/their authorized caPacitydes). and ~ by his/hsr/theirsignature(s) on the instnm~nt the
I;}emon(s) or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s} acted, executed the instrumenL
WITNESS my hand an~ offiP..iaJ seal,
Slgnatur~///7~.~~~~~, --, -. ~-., :. ';-'-_, . . ,
i'
TrUe of Document .M o~f~ ~ 0 [ '
~er sig~at~ not a~!ed~ ~/~No. ~ Pag~ 3
Recorded at request of and return to:
Department of Building Services
Real Property Management Division
3133 7~h Street
Riverside, California 902507
FREE RECORDING
This instrument is for t/le benefit of
the County of Riverside and is entitled
to be recorded without fee.
(Govt. Code 6103)
~ty of Temecula Community Service Districttin behalf .of
C.S.A. 143 ("GRANTEE"), together with the right to further grant
or transfer the same to others, a perpetual easement and right-of-
way for maintaining, operating, altering, repairing, and replacing
equipment and landscaping over and within the boundaries of that
certain real property located in the County of R~verside, State of
California, more particularly described in Exhibit "A" and shown
in Exhibit "B" attached hereto, which is incorporated herein by
this reference (the "Easement Area").
If GRANTEE, or its governmental entity, successors, or assigns,
determines it is unable, incapable, or unwilling to maintain said
Easement Area, maintenance shall, after notice, become the
responsibility of GRANTOR, with all covenants and agreements of
this easement extending to and becoming obligations of all heirs,
executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the GRANTOR.
DATED
/_f'.
7160019
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )
SS.
On before me, the
~tarVPublic in and for State, personally appeared
undersigned, a
BARBARA A. ROBINET
OFRC/AL NOTARYSEAL
· ' resMAY31.1994
du~s s ~
Jose h ~z;~od~..$andsaYs~hat he ~nsb'umenlasawitnessb,.~reto who ·
Notan/). the and S lvla M (he/she) was Present and sa: . being
to within ins execute the same, and that said affiant to !he w~e~d annexed in-
na~. t~ntos trumentasa witness at the mquest of
THIS CERT/RCATE onnauon *
TO THE DOCUMENT Number of Pages_
DESCRIBED AT RIGHT:
Date
S/gner(s) Other Than Named Above _ of Document
deed.csa
August 24,
1990
~e. 'RO.
EXHIBIT "A" ~
Legal Description:
Those portions of Lot 50 of Tract Number 22148 in the
unincorporated territory of Riverside County, as recorded June 22,
1989 in Book 202 of Maps, at Pages 92-104, records of said county,
state of California, lying within a portion of Section 29, Township
7 South, Range 2 West, San Bernardino Base and Principal Meridian,
more particularly described as follows:
EASEMF~ AREA "A"
BEGINNING at the most southerly corner of said Lot 50, in the
northwesterly line of LaSerena Way 88.00 feet wide; thence,'
along the southwesterly line of said Lot 50, North 47041,03"
West 23.22 feet to a point; thence, leaving said
southwesterly line of said Lot 50, o
North 74 11'00" East 68.83
feet; thence, North 38°35'02" East 20.00 feet; thence, North
69°25'58" East 5.14 feet to the southwesterly line of Calle
Medusa 66.00 feet wide; thence, along said southwesterly
line, South 20°34'02" East 20.82 feet; thence, continuing
along the easterly line of said Lot 50, South 26031'48'' West
33.77 feet to a point in the northwesterly line of said La
Serena Way; thence, along said northwesterly line of said Le
Serena Way, South 71e15'58" West 55.61 feet to the POINT OF
BEGINNING.
Said easement contains 1,396 square feet more or less.
lot50.eas
August 24, 1990
BEGINNING at the most southerly corner of said Lot 50, in the
northwesterly line of La Serena Way S8.00 feet wide; thence,
North 71°15'58" East 55.61 along said northwesterly line;
thence, continuing along the southeasterly line of said Lot
50, North 26°31'48" East 33.77 feet; thence, leaving said
southeasterly line, North 69°25'58" East 5.00 feet~ thence,
South26°31'48" West 41.10 feet~ thence, South71~15'58" West
52.64 feet to the southwesterly line of said Tract Number
22148~ thence, along said southwesterly line North 47~41'03"
West 5.71' to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
Said easement contains 398 square feet more or less.
L.S. 593
Llc nse E 1res 12/31/927
lot50.eas
August 24, 1990
EXHIBIT" B"
Recorded at request of and return to:
DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING SERVICES
Real Property Management Division
3133 7th Street
Riverside, California 902507
FREE RECORDING
This instrument is for the benefit of
the County of Riverside and is entitled
to be recorded without fee.
(Govt. Code 6103)
Parcel:
Project:
FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, __
("GRANTOR") hereby grants and conveys to the City of Temecula Community Service
District in behalf of C.S.A. 143 C'GRANTEE'), together with the dght to further grant or
transfer the same to others, a revocable easement and right-of-way for maintaining,
operating, altering, repairing, and replacing equipment and landscaping over and within
the boundaries of that certain real property located in the County of Riverside, State of
California, more particularly described in Exhibit 'A' and shown in Exhibit 'B" attached
hereto, which is incorporated herein by this reference (the 'Easement Area').
If GRANTEE, or its governmental entity, successors, or assigns, determines it is unable,
incapable, or unwilling to maintain said Easement Area, maintenance shall, after notice,
become the responsibility of GRANTOR, 'with all covenants and agreements of this
easement extending to and becoming obligations of all heirs, executors, administrators,
successors and assigns of the GRANTOR.
DATED
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )
SS ·
SUBSCRIBING-WITNESS ACKNOWLEDGMENT ("WITNESS JURAT")
S~te of California
Coun~ of San Diego } SS.
OFFICIAL NOTARY SEA[.
BARBARA A RO~NET
No~rYPutic--C/txr~
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
My Cornre. Ex~res MAY31,1994
Onbh~ffie ~.w-a dayof D,=t, emher 19 qO ~beforerne. U~eunder~gned
NotaWPu~c, bersondyappemed John Slatton (narneofsubsc~ngwm'mas),
~ personaey known to me
[] proved~rneon~eoaffi/afSrma~onof John SlatCon (name of cmdib~ ~
wffi'~SS who kJen~es subsc~b~g ~4b~ess), a cred~e vaness wh(xn I know person~y,
he
Oymeddyswom. deposes and says bhat (he/she) was present and saw
Tom Hornbeak and Gayle Horn~of ~nd~ ragnet not appearing before
s~'ument as a pady ~ereto. execute fie same, and fiat sad affiant subscribed he (h~/her)
~o~eaw~m ~s~urnent as a v~fiess at fie request ofT°m Hornbeak and Gayle
l(name of pdnc~t s~ner again)
'~h~LL~ ~ - (No~y's s~nature)
ATrENTION NOTARY: .Nthough the information requested bek~w is OFTIONAL, it could Ibmvent fraudulent attachment of this celfficate to fib'at docta'neft
Title or Type of Document
THIS CERTIRCATE
MUST BE ATFACHED Number of Pages Date of Document
TO THE DOCUMENT
DESCRIBED AT RIGHT: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above
7160019
NR'K3NN. NO1N:IY ASSOCI/~.8238Fieenmet/ee..RO. Box 7184 . C~',u,~Pek, CA 91304-1184
deed.csa
August 24, 1990
EXHIBIT "A"
Legal Description:
Those portions of Lot 51 of Tract ~mher 22148 in the
unincorporated territory of Riverside County, as recorded June 22,
1989 in Book 202 of Maps, at Pages 92-104, records of said county,
state of California, lying within a portion of Section 29, Township
7 Sou~h, Range 2 West, San Bernardino Base and Principal Meridian,
more particularly described as follows:
EASEMENT AREA nan
BEGINNING at the most westerly corner of said Lot 51, in the
southeasterly line of La Serena Way 88.00 feet wide, being a
tangent curve concave northwesterly with a radius of 1044.00
feet, a radial to said corner bears South 33°23e50" East;
thence, along said southeasterly line and said curve through
a central angle of 4°16t51" an arc length of 78.00 to a point;
thence, continuing along the northerly line of said Lot 51,
North 87°57"28" East 30.00 feet to a point in the
southwesterly line of Poole Court 60.00 feet wide, being also
a curve concave northeasterly with a radius of 350.00 feet,
a radial to said point bears South 39 33e53" West; thence,
along said southwesterly line and said curvethrougha central
angle of 0°58t15" an arc length of 5.93 feet to a point;
said southwesterly line, South 38 35~38'
thence, departing o
West 3.30 feet; thence, South 82~28~58" West 28.20 feet;
thence, South 51~54~21" West 76.01 feet to a point in the
southwesterly line of said Lot 51; thence, along said
southwesterly line, North 38~00~11" West 13.34 feet to the
POINT OF BEGINNING.
Said easement contains 1,095 square feet more or less.
1ot51.eas
August 24, 1990
EASEMENT AREA "B"
BEGINNING at the most westerly corner of said Lot 51, in the
southeasterly line of La Serena Way 88.00 feet wide; thence,
North 33°23m49w West 5.00 to a point in a curve concave
northwesterly with a radius of 1039.00 feet, a radial to said
point bears South 33°23m49" East; thence, along said curve
through a central angle of 4°15'00" an arc length of 77.07
feet; thence, North 87°57'28" East 36.69 feet; thence,
South 39°33'53a West 5.00 feet to a'point in the northerly
line of said Lot 51; thence, along said northerly line, South
87°57'28" West 30.00 feet to a point in :said southeasterly
line of La Serena Way, being also a curve concave
northwesterly with a radius of 1044.00 feet~ thence, along
said southeasterly line and said curve througha central angle
of 4°16'51" an arc length 78.00 feet to the POINT OF
BEGINNING.
Said easement contains 512 square feet more or less.
8-2 - e O
' L.S. 537
12/31~92
1ot51.eas
August 24, 1990
EXHIBIT" B"
Recorded at request of and return to:
DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING SERVICES
Real Property Management Division
3133 7th Street
Riverside, California 902507
FREE RECORDING
This instrument is for the benefit of
the County of Riverside and is entitled
to be recorded without fee.
(Govt. Code 6103)
Parcel:
Project:
("GRAN~')~ereby grants and conveys to the City'of Temecula Community Service
District in behalf of C.S.A. 143 ("GRANTEE"), together with the dght to further grant or
transfer the same to others, a revocable easement and right-of-way for maintaining,
operating, altering, repairing, and replacing equipment and landscaping over and within
the boundaries of that certain real property located in the County of Riverside, State of
California, more particularly described in Exhibit 'A" and shown in Exhibit 'B" attached
hereto, which is incorporated herein by this reference (the "Easement Area").
If GRANTEE, or its govemmental entity, successors, or assigns, determines it is unable,
incapable, or unwilling to maintain said Easement Area, maintenance shall, after notice,
become the responsibility of GRANTOR, with all covenants and agreements of this
easement extending to and becoming obligations of all heirs, executors, administrators,
successors and assigns of the GRANTOR.
DATED 3/~/~./~,Z~/_/''
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )
SS.
SUBSCRIBING-WITNESS ACKNOWLEDGMENT ("WITNESS JUFLAT')
State of Ca1 ~ forn~
County of San Dte~o
OFFICIAL NOTARY SEAL
BARBARA k ROB|NET
Nota~/Pulic -- Calornla
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
SS.
Onthisme 3rd dayof December 1990 .beforeme, ffieunder~
Nota, yPub~c, person~appeared John Sla~:r. on
(name of su~cdU~ wrmess),
[] Proved to rne on the oath/affuTrmtion of John Slact:on
(name of credible
t~bethe~ers~nwh~senameissubsc~bedt~ew~thininstrumentasawi~ne~sthe~et~.wh~.being
Bbyrnedulyswom. deposes and sa that (he/she) was present ancl saw
ob L. Thone and HeTen Thone
o
strument as a party thereto. execute the same, and that said aftant subscribed he (his/her)
name to the within instrument as a witness at the request of Bob L, Thone and Helen
THIS CERTIRCATE Tffie or Type of Document
MUST BE ATI'ACHED Number of Pages Date of Document
TO THE DOCUMENT
DESCRIBED AT RIGHT: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above
718) 019
NATIONALNO'INRYA~-BE38~Avt,p.O. Bm718e,~i~CA 91304-1184
deed. csa
August 24,
1990
EXHIBIT
Legal Description:
Those portions of Lot 57 of Tract Number 22148 in the
unincorporated territory of Riverside County, as recorded June 22,
1989 in Book 202 of Maps, at Pages 92-104, records of said county,
state of California, lying within a portion of Section 29, Township
7 South, Range 2 West, San Bernardino Base and Principal Meridian,
more particularly described as follows:
EASEMENT AREA
BEGINNING at the most westerly corner of said Lot 57, in the
southeasterly line of La Serena Way 88.00 feet wide, being-a
tangent curve concave northwesterly with.a radius of 1044.00
feet, a radial to said comer bears South 29°26'45- East;
thence, along said southeasterly line and said curve through
a central angle of 4°57'05" an arc length of 72.00 feet to the
most northerly corner of said Lot 57; thence, leaving said
southeasterly line and continuing along the northeasterly line
of said Lot 57, South 38°00tll" East 13.34 feet to a point;
thence, leaving said northeasterly line, South 89018'47" West
6.97 feet; thence, South 56°01'22" West 38.80 feet; thence,
South 57~42'49" West 29.53 feet to a point in the
southwesterly line of said Lot 57; thence, along said
southwesterly line, North 27043'40" West 11.88 feet to the
POINT OF BEGINNING.
Said easement contains 777 square feet more or less.
1ot57.eas
August 24, 1990
~E~'fENT ~ 'Be
BEGINNING at the most westerly comer of said Lot 57, in the
southeasterly line of La Serena Way 88.00 feet wide; thence,
North 29°26'45' West 5.00 feet to a point in a curve concave
northwesterly with a radius of 1039.00 feet, a radial to said
point bears South 29026'45, East; thence, along said curve
through a central angle of 3°57~05, an arc length of 71.65
feet; thence, leaving said curve, South 33o23'50, East 5.00
feet to the most northerly corner of said Lot 57, being a
point in the southeasterly line of said La Serena Way, being
also a curve concave northwesterly with a radius of 1044.00
feet, a radial to said corner bears South 33°23~50" East;
thence, along said southeasterly line and.' said curve through
a central angle of 3°57'05w an arc length of 72.00 feet to the
POINT OF BEGINNING.
Said easement contains 359 square feet more or less.
lot57.eas
August 24, 1990
EXHIBIT" B '
Recorded at request of and return to:
DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING SERVICES
Real Property Management Division
3133 7th Street
Riverside, California 902507
FREE RECORDING
This instrument is for the benefit of
the County of Riverside and is entitled
to be recorded without fee.
(Govt. Code 6103)
Parcel:
Project:
("GRANTOR") here ants and conve~;s to the C cula Community Service
District in behalf of C.S.A. 143 ("GRANTEE"), together with the right to further grant or
transfer the same to others, a revocable easement and right-of-way for maintaining,
operating, altering, repairing, and replacing equipment and landscaping over and within
the boundaries of that certain real property located in the County of Riverside, State of
California, more particularly described in Exhibit "A" and shown in Exhibit 'B" attached
hereto, which is incorporated herein by this reference (the "Easement Area.).
If GRANTEE, or its governmental entity, successors, or assigns, determines it is unable,
incapable, or unwilling to maintain said EaSement Area, maintenance shall, after notice,
become the respons~ility of GRANTOR, with all covenants and agreements of this
easement extending to and becoming obligations of all heirs, executors, administrators,
· '
DATED
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
.'7'~,z
GRANTOR
SUBSCRIBING-WITNESS ACKNOWLEDGMENT ("WITNESS JURAT")
Site of California
Coun~of San Diego }SS.
OFFICIAL NOTARY SEAL.
BARBARA A. ROBINEl'
NOlay PUtiC -- Callkxnia
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
Cornre. Expires MAY 31,1994
O, tl~s~e 29thdayof November'--: 1990 .Oeforeme.~eunde~ned
Notary Pu~c. personally al~eared John Slatton (name of ~___~,v~J witness).
IZ pe,so~lyknowntome
[~ proved to rne on the oath/aff~matjon of John Slatton
(name of Credble
witness who identifies subscribing witr--,o,s), acmdible witness whom I know persoraly,
t~bethepers~nwh~senameissubsc~ib~dt~~hewithininstrumentasawimessth~~et~~wh~.~-~-```
by me duly swom, def3oses and says that I~= (he/she) was present ancl saw
Patrick Leone and Julie LeOn~-mmeof~d~r~notappemingbefore
strurnent as a party ~ereto, exec~e fiae same, and fiat s~d aftant subsc~bed he (h~her)
nameto~ewffi~nh~strumentasaw~nessatfiarequestoPnt~-t~,~ l.pnTte Rna .ln3tp
(name of pdn~pe s~n~ ag~n)
ATTENTION NOTARY: Allhou(~ the information re~__,ee_!ed beow is OPTIONAL it could prevent fm,__,d,__,~,nt attac:tmqe~t of this ceffificate to ano~ar doctmmnL
THIS CERTIRCATE TiUe or Type of Document
MUST BE ATTACHED Number of Pages Date of Document
TO THE [X)CUMENT
DESCRI8ED AT RIGHT: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above
7160019
N~IONAL NOTARY ASS(X::Rl[3N.8238RSnWnetAve..RO. BOx 7184.Can6ge pmk. CA 91304-7184
Date
deed.csa
August 24, 1990
EXHIBIT
Legal Description:
Those portions of Lot 58 of Tract Number 22148 in the
unincorporated territory of Riverside County, as recorded June 22,
1989 in Book 202 of Maps, at Pages 92-104, records of said county,
state of California, lying within a portion of Section 29, Township
7 South, Range 2 West, San Bornardino Base and Principal Meridian,
more particularly described as follows:
BEGINNING at the most northerly corner of said Lot 58, in the
southeasterly line of La Serena Way 88.00 feet wide~ thence-,
South 27°43t40- East 11.88 feet, along thenortheasterly line
of said Lot 58~ thence, leaving said northeasterly line,
South57°42t49" West 40.08 feet~ thence,-South 58°53~09- West
68.95 feet~ thence, South 64~45~27" West 22.47 feet to a
point in the southwesterly line of said Lot 58~ thence, along
said southwesterly line, North 70~35~57- West 34.09 feet to
the most westerly comer of said Lot 58, being also a point
in the southeasterly line of La Serena Way 88.00 feet wide,
being also a point on a curve concave northwesterly with a
radius of 1044.00 feet~ thence, along said southeasterly line
and said curve, through a central angle of 8~29e26- an arc
length of 154.71 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
Said easement contains 2,497 square feet more less.
lot58. eas
August 24, 1990
EA~~ ~ nBn
BEGINNING at the most northerly corner of said Lot 58, in t~
southeasterly line of La Serena Way 8S.00 feet wide; thence,
North 29'26t44w West 5.00 feet to a point in a curve concave
northwesterly witha radius of 1039.00 feet, a radial to said
point bears South 29'26e44w East; thence, along said curve
through a central angle of S'29e26n an arc length of 153.97
feet; thence, leaving said curve, South 20'57e18- East 5.00
feet to the most westerly comer of said Lot 58 in 'the
southeasterly line of said La Serena Way, being also a curve
concave northwesterly witha radius of 1044.00 feet, a radial
to said point bears South 20'57'18" East; thence, along said
southeasterly line and said curve through a central angle of
8'29e26w an arc length of 154.71 feet: to the POINT OF
BEGINNING.
Said easement contains 772 square feet more or less.
L.S. 5937
12/31/92
1ot58.eas
August 24, 1990
/3O33'
/ ~
~LTON
Recorded at request of and return to:
Department of Building Services
Real Property Management Division
3133 7th Street
Riverside, California 902507
FREE RECORDING
This instrument is for the benefit of
the County of Riverside and is entitled
to be recorded without fee.
(Govt. Code 6103)
FOR A VALUABLR CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby
acknowledged, C~a~/~(. ~~TOR~
"G ) herebygrants and conveys
to the City of Temecula Community Service District in behalf of
C.S.A. 143 ("GRANTEE"), together with the right to further grant
or transfer the same to others, a perpetual easement and right-of-
way for maintaining, operating, altering, repairing, and replacing
equipment and landscaping over and within the boundaries of that
certain real property located in the County of Riverside, State of
California, more particularly described in Exhibit "A" and shown
in Exhibit "B" attached hereto, which is incorporated herein by
this reference (the "Easement Area").
If GRANTEE, or its governmental entity, successors, or assigns,
determines it is unable, incapable, or unwilling to maintain said
Easement Area, maintenance shall, after notice, become the
responsibility of GRANTOR, With all covenants and agreements of
this easement extending to and becoming obligations of all heirs,
executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the GRANTOR.
GRANTOR
/
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
SS.
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )
on ~e~n~c ~3, I~0 before me, 'the
instrument and a edg a u
undersigned, a
,known to
the within
the same.
WITNESS my hand official seal.
CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE
This is to certify that the interest in real property conveyed by
the within deed to the City of Temecula Community Service District
in behalf of C.S.A. 143, a political corporation and/or
governmental agency, is hereby accepted by order of the Board of
Directors on the date below and the GRANTEE consents to the
recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer.
Date
deed.c~a
August 24, 1990
EXHIBIT
Legal Description:
Those portions of Lot 59 of Tract Number 22148 in the
unincorporated territory of Riverside County, as recorded June 22,
1989 in Book 202 of Maps, at Pages 92-104, records of said county,
state of California, lying within a portion of Section 29, Township
7 South, Range 2 West, San Bernardino Base and Principal Meridian,
more particularly described as follows:
BEGINNING at the most westerly corner of said Lot 59, in the
southeasterly line of La Serena Way 88.00 feet wide; thence,-
along said southeasterly line, North71°15~.S8- East 34.10 feet
to the beginning of a tangent curve concave northwesterly with
a radius of 1044.00 feet~ thence, along said southeasterly
line and said curvethrougha central angle of 2°13~17- an arc
length to the most northerly corner of said Lot 59, a radial
to said corner bears South 20 57~19" East~ thence, leaving
said southeasterly line and said curve, continuing along the
northeasterly line of said Lot 59, South 70~35t58- West 34.09
feet to a point~ thence, leaving said northeasterly line,
South 64°45~27" West 28.99 feet~ thence, South65~10~24- West
56.55 feet to a point in the southwesterly line of said Lot
59~ thence, along said southwesterly line, North 47~41~03-
West 33.77 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
Said easement contains 2,115 square feet more or less.
EASEMENT AREA "B"
BEGINNING at the most westerly corner of said Lot 59, in the
southeasterl. y line of La Serena Way 88.00 feet wide, being
also a point in the southwesterly line of said Tract Number
221487 th.ence, along said southwesterly line, North47°41~03-
West 5.71 feet~ thence, North 71°15~58- East to the beginning
of a tangent curve concave northwesterly with a radius Of
1039.00 feet, a radial to said point bears South 18~44~02-
West; thence, along said curve through a central angle of
2°13~17" an arc length of 40.28 feet~ thence, leaving said
curve, South 20~57~19" East 5.00 feet to the most northerly
corner of said Lot 59, being also a point in said
southeasterly line of La Serena Way, said southeasterly line
being a curve concave northwesterly with a radius of 1044.00
feet, a radial to said point bears South 20°57~19. East~
thence, along said curve through a central angle of 2°13~17-
1ot59.eas
August 24, 1990
an arc length of 40.47 feet~ thence, continuing along the
southeasterly line of saidLaSerena Way, tangent to last said
curve, South 71°15,58w West 34.10 feet to the POINT OF
BEGINNING.
Said easement contains 379 square feet more or less.
/t
lot59.eas
August 24, 1990
EXHIBIT "B"
"ALTON
~'~ ~
,v~ LOT ~V"
Recorded at request of and return to:
DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING SERVICES
Real Property Management Division
3133 7th Street
Riverside, California 902507
FREE RECORDING
This instrument is for the benefit of
the County of Riverside and is entitled
to be recorded without fee.
(Govt. Code 6103)
Project:
District in behalf of C.S.A. 143 ('GRANTEE), together with the right to further grant or
transfer the same to others, a revocable easement and right-of-way for maintaining,
operating, altering, repairing, and replacing equipment and landscaping over and within
the boundaries of that certain real property located in the County of Riverside, State of
California, more particularly described in Exhibit 'A' and shown in Exhibit 'B' attached
herato, which is incorporated herein by this reference (the 'Easement Area').
If GRANTEE, or its governmental entity, successors, or signs, determines it is unable,
incapable, or unwilling to mantan said Easement Area, maintenance shall, after notice,
become the responsibility of GRANTOR, with all covenants and agreements of this
easement extending to and becoming obligations of all heirs, executors, administrators,
successors and T~,of the GRANTOR.
Witness by: ~ X/~~
GRANTOR
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )
SS.
SUBSCRIBING-WITNESS ACKNOWLEDGMENT ("WITNESS JURAT")
Site of CalifoTnia
CounW of San Diego } SS.
OFFICIAL NOTARY SEAL
BARBARA A. ROBINET
Nolay Public -- California
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
Comm. Expires MAY 31,199,1
O. mis me 29th day of November 1990 . before me. the undersigned
No~WPu~c, maC~eared John SlatCon (nameofsubec~b~w~ness).
[] proved to me on the oath/affimmtion of John Slatl:on (narneoforedible
witness who identifies subscribing witness). a cxedible witness whom I know persona~.
t~bethepers~nwh~senameis~ubsc~bedt~thew~thininstrumentas~witnesstheret~~wh~~beng
me uh/ , and says that he (he/she) was present and saw
(name of pdndpaa mgr~er not appearing before
Notary), the same person described in and whose name is subscribed to the within and annexed in-
strument as a party thereto, execute the same, and that said aftant subscribed. he (his/her)
name o the within instrument as a witness at the request of }faLchael Sean Brownin.8;
)
THIS CERTIRCATE 'RUe or Type of Document
MUST BE ATTACHED Number of Pages Date of Document
TO THE DOCUMENT
DESCRIBED AT RIGHT: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above ·
7160019
N/ZlONN.~~*8236Ftenmet/ee.*RO. Box ?184-Ca,-,c.,~Pek. CA 91304-7184
deed. csa
August 24,
1990
EXHIBIT
Legal Description:
Those portions of Lot 79 of Tract Number 22148 in the
unincorporated territory of Riverside County, as recorded June 22,
1989 in Book 202 of Maps, at Pages 92-104, records of said county,
state of California, lying within a portion of Section 29, Township
7 South, Range 2 West, San Bernardino Base and Principal Meridian,
more particularly described as follows:
EASEMENT AREA
BEGINNING at the northwest comer of said Lot 79, in the
southeasterly line of La Serena Way 88.00 feet wide; thence,.
South 89°31'25" East 16.14 feet, along the northerly line of
said Lot 79; thence, leaving said northerly line, South
43°51'50" West 103.49 feet; thence, South 3°03'31" East 25.81
feet; thence, South34°29'41- West 5.87 feet to the northerly
line of Pools Court 60.00 feet wide; thence, along said
northerly line, being a tangent curve concave northerly with
a radius of 290.00 feet, through a central angle of 0°57'30"
an arc length of 4.85 feet to a point, a radial to said point
bears South35°27'11- West; thence, North2e09'22" West 37.02
feet along the southwesterly line of said Lot 79 to a point
of cusp with the southeasterly line of said La Serena Way;
thence, along said southeasterly line, being a curve concave
northwesterly witha radius of 1044.00 feet, through a central
angle of 4e59t19" an arc length of 90.90 feet to the POINT OF
BEGINNING.
Said easement contains 1,313 square feet more or less.
EASEMENT AREA "B"
BEGINNING at the northwest comer of said Lot 79, in the
southeasterly line of La Serena Way S8.00 feet wide, being
also a point in the northerly line of said Tract~,mher 22148;
thence, along said northerly line, North 89e31'25" West 6.62
feet to a point in a curve concave northwesterly witha radius
of 1039.00 feet, a radial to said point bears South 48e27'39"
East; thence, along said curve through a central angle of
4e43t49" an arc length of 85.78 feet; thence, leaving said
curve, South 2°09'22" East 44.95 feet; thence, North
35e27'11" East 5.00 feet to a point in the northeasterly line
of Poole Court 60.00 feet wide; thence, continuing along the
southwesterly line of said Lot 79, North 2°09'22" West 37.02
1ot79.eas
August 24, 1990
feet to a point in said southeasterly line of La Serena Way,
being a curve concave northwesterly with a radius of 1044.00
feet, a radial to said point bears South43o42 t 40" East ~
thence, along said curve through a central angle of 4°59 ' 19"
an arc length of 90.90 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
Said easement contains 567 square feet more or less.
1ot79.eas
Auqust 24, 1990
EXHIBIT" B"
RecOrded at request of and return to:
City Clerks Department
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
FREE RECORDING
This instrument is for the benefit of
the City of Temecula and is entitled
to be recorded without fee
(GovL Cede 6103}.
IRREVOCABLE OFFER TO DEDICATE
Parcel:
APN # 9143100097
Project:
Tract 22148
FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged,
George Wimpey Inc. dba Morrison Homes
("Grantor"), hereby irrevocably offers to dedicate to the City of Temecula ("Grantee"), together
with the right to further grant or transfer the same to others, a perpetual easement and right-of way for
maintaining, operations, altering, repairing, and replacing equipment and landscaping over and within the
boundaries of that certain real property located in the City of Temecula, County of riverside, more particularly
described in Exhibit 'W' attached hereto, which is incorporated herein by this reference (the "Easement Area").
administrators, successors an .~.i//o e~/~..,~R.
GRAN~T k U FJ
DATED
If GRANTEE, or its governmental entity, successors, or assigns, determines it is unable, incapable, or unwilling
to maintain said Easement Area, maintenance shall, after notice, become the responsibility of GRANTOR, with:
all covenants and agreements of this easement extending to and becoming obligations of all heirs, executors,
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
On .~11'-I Icl5j~ before me, the undersigned. A NotaW Public in and for the State of California, personally appeared
'f' ~) P. , personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of -_,-_ticfactory ovklonoo) to be the
~J-~.T./::tr F, ur~ ·
person(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their
authorized capacitydes), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon beliaif of which the
person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Signature E,~ P,~C-,L-~
CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE
I' ' ': DIANNE'~ I
This is to cerlffy that the interest in real property conveyed by the within Irrevocable Offer To Dedicate to the City of Temecula, a
political corporation and/or governmental agency, is hereby accepted by order of the City Council the date below and the Grantee
consents to the recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer.
Date
· ' June S. Greek, City Clerk
""' EXHIBIT "A"
PARCEL"A"
PORTION OF LOT 80 OF TRAC'F NUMBER 22148 IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA,
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, AS RECORDED JUNE 22, 1989 IN BOOK 202 OF MAPS, AT
PAGES 92-104, RECORDS OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, LYING WITHIN A PORTION OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH,
RANGE 2 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, AND MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE MOST ~Y CORNER OF SAID LOT 80 ALSO BEING A
POINT ON THE SO~STERLY LINE OF LOT "G" OF SAID TRACT NUMBER 22148;
THENCE LEAVING SAID SOUTHEASTERLY LINE SOUTH 47°41'59* EAST A
DISTANCE OF 17.09 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 9°14'43* WEST A DISTANCE OF 7.02
FEET; THENCE SOUTH 31 °55 '55" EAST A DISTANCE OF 51.12 FEET; THENCE SOUTH
24°37'21* EAST A DISTANCE OF 75.65 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 60°42'52" EAST A
DISTANCE OF 34.65 FRRT TO A POINT ON THE NORTttWF~TERLY LINE OF LOT "F"
OF SAID TRACT NUMBER 22148, BEING A CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY
WITH A RADIUS OF 956.00 FEET, A RADIAL TO SAID POINT BEARS NORTH
24°18'01* WEST; THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
00°13'50* AN ARC I-RNGTH OF 3.85 l~.k-rr TO THE MOST SOUTI-~-RLY CORNER OF
SAID LOT 80; THF-NCE LEAVING SAID CURVE AND ALONG THE SOUTI-~-RLY LINE
OF SAID LOT 80, NORTH 68"27'54* WEST 34.24 FEET TO A POINT ON THE
NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF LOT *E* OF SAm TRACT NUMBER 22148; THENCE
ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE, NORTH 20034'02* WEST A DISTANCE OF 20.42'
FEET TO A POINT, SAID POINT BRING THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE
CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY WITH A RADIUS OF 333.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE TO
SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 69°25'58" EAST; TI-IF~NCE, ALONG SAID CURVE
THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 19°59'55" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 116.23 FEET;
THENCE LEAVING SAID CURVE AND ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT
· 80, NORTH 03°16'38" EAST A DISTANCE OF 17.89 l~-~:~r TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
SAID PARCEL CONTAINS 1,183.1 SQUARE FE~., 0.027 ACRES MORE OR LESS.
SUBJECt TO ALL COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESERVATIONS, REST~CTIONS,
RIGHTS, RIGHTS OF WAY AND EASEMENTS, IF ANY, OF RECO_.RD.
SEE EXI-HRIT "B" A'rrACH~-n HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART
HEREOF.
File No. wp51~MORBO-86.1gl
PARCEL "B" ~
THOSE PORTIONS OF LOT "E*, LOT "F", AND LOT *G" OF TRACT NUMBER 22148,
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, AS RECORDED JUNE 22, 1989
IN BOOK 202 OF MAPS, AT PAGES 92-104, RECORDS OF THE COUNTY RECORDER
OF SAID COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, LYING WITHIN A PORTION OF SECTION
29, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 2 WEST, SAN BERNARD1NO BASE AND PRINCIPAL
MERIDIAN, AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE MOST WESTERLY CORNER OF LOT 80 OF SAID TRACT
NUMBER 22148 ALSO BEING A POINT ON THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT
"G"; THENCE ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF LOT 80 OF SAD TRACT NUMBER
22148, SOUTH 03°16'38" WEST A DISTANCE OF 17.89 FEET TO A POINT ON THE
NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAD LOT "E", SAID POINT BEING ON A CURVE
CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY WITH RADIUS OF 333.00 FEET, A RADIAL TO SAID
POINT BEARS NORTH 49°26'03" EAST; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID
CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 19°59'55" AN ARC LENGTH OF 116.23
FEET; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT
"E*, SOUTH 20034'02" EAST A DISTANCE OF 20.42 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 68°27'54"
EAST A DISTANCE OF 34.24 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF
SAID LOT "F" BEING A CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWES~Y WITH A RADIUS OF
956.00 FEET, A RADIAL TO SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 24°04'11" WEST; THENCE
NORTH EASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
28°08'12* AN ARC DISTANCE OF 469.47 FEET; THENCE TANGENT TO SAID CURVE
NORTH 37°47'37" EAST A DISTANCE OF 18.17 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A
TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY WITH RADIUS OF 1644.00 FEET;
THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
05°08'42" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 147.63 FEET TO THE MOST EASTERLY CORNER OF
LOT 86 OF SAID TRACT NUMBER 22148, THE RADIAL LINE TO SAID CORNER
BEARS NORTH 47°03'41" WEST; THENCE LEAVING SAID CURVE AND SAID
NORTHWF. STERLY LINE OF SAID LOT "F", SOUTH 47°03'41" EAST A DISTANCE OF
5.00 FPl:~I' TO A POINT ON A CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY WITH A RADIUS
OF 1639.00 FF~EI'; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 5°08'42" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 147.18 F~-k'T; THI~NCE
TANGENT TO SAID CURVE SOUTH 37047'37" WEST A DISTANCE OF 18.17 F!~-P"r TO
THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE NORTHWESTERLY WITH RADIUS OF
961'.00 FF.k":I'; TI-IF~NCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH 'A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 28°08, 12" AN ARC DISTANCE.OF 471.93 l~-~'f TO POINT WITH
RADIAL BEARING OF SOUTH 24°04'11" EAST; THENCE LEAVING SAID CURVE
NORTH 68027'54" WEST A DISTANCE OF 41.39 FEET; THENCE NORTH 20034'02"
WEST A DISTANCE OF 20.62 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE
CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY WITH RADIUS OF 328.00 FF-~T, THE RADIAL LINE TO
SAD BEGINNING OF CURVE BEARS NORTH 69025'58" EAST; THENCE
NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
File No. wpS1~MOMO-8e.lOI
20°04'07" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 114.89 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID CURVE,
NORTH 03° 16'38" EAST A DISTANCE OF 24.21 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 47°41 '03" EAST
A DISTANCE OF 5.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
SAID PARCEL CONTAINS 4,075.~-SQUARE FEET, 0.094 ACRES MORE OR LESS.
SUBJECT TO ALL COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESERVATIONS, RESTRICTIONS,
RIGfiTS, RIGHTS OF WAY AND EASEMENTS, IF ANY, OF RECORD.
SEE EXHIBIT "B" ATFACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A-PART
F'de No. wpSI VdOReO-Be.lgl
CURVE LENGTH DELTA RADIUS
3.85' 0'13'50' 956.00'
,,,' \ \ ,
I...U. N37*47'37*E 18,17°
U5 $47'41'03'E: 5.00' % = .
(' ',, , ..,~.:*-,I
,A ..... 0
~ Lot 96
· f .......... .~.............!..~ ,. , r ':: _~ ~ '
LAND$C~°E
Portions of Lot 80. Lot "~', Lot "F'
- mt ,..m== · um,x., and Lot 'G' of Tract 22148 recordea*-*'
F,/'Ollt~//g June 22, 1989 am shown by map filed
~,~,~.~ ~ nook 202,
r.i.: ms)4ao-no~ rmcord8 of the County Recorder. Riverside
County. State of Cel~omla
Recorded at request of and return to:
City Clerks Department
City of Ternecula
43174 Business Park Drive
/..T. emecula, CA 92590
tEE RECORDING
This instrument is for the benefit of
the City of Temecula and is entitled
to be recorded without fee
(Govt. Code 6103).
IRREVOCABLE OFFER TO DEDICATE
Parcel:
APN it 9143100097
Project
Tract 22148
FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby ackn~ledged,
George Wimpey Inc. dba Morrison Homes
("Grantor"), hereby irrevocably offers to dedicate to the City of Temecula ("Grantee"), together
with the right to further grant or transfer the same to others, a perpetual easement and right-of way for
maintaining, operations, altering, repairing, and repladng equipment and landscaping over and within the
boundaries of that certain real property located in the City of Temecula, County of riverside, more .particularly
described in Exhibit 'W' attached hereto, which is incorporated herain by .this reference (the "Easement Area").
If GRANTEE, or its governmental entity, successors, or assigns, determines it is unable, incapable, or unwilling
to maintain said Easement Area, maintenance shall, after notice, become the responsibility of GRANTOR, with
all covenants and agreements of this easement ,xtending to and becoming obligations of all heirs, executors,
assigns f . NTOR.
administrators, successors and ~ //:/./~- .
DATED
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
on 5lt )?k befo{~ the undersigned, A 'Notary Public in and for be State of California, personab/appeared
!d. ~ ). ~ l' u .I , : , personally known to me (or proved to me on the b~i= of istiff'/ctory evklenee) to be Ihe
person(s) is/are suJISed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/the
authorized capadty(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upq. n behalf of which the
person(s) acted, executed the instrumenL
WITNESS my hand and offi~~.~/L4~
Signature ~
CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE
This is to certify that the interest in real property conveyed by the within Irrevocable Offer To Dedicate to the City of Temecula, a
political corporation and/or governmentel agency, is hereby accepted by order of the City Council the date below and the Grantee
/'-~ents to the recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer.
June S. Greek. City Clerk
EXHIBIT 'A~ ~
Legal Description:
That portion of Lot 81 of Tract Number 22148 in the unincorporated
territory of Riverside County, as recorded June 22, 1989 in Book
202 of Maps, at Pages 92-104, records of said county, state of
California, lying within a portion of Section 29, Township 7 South,
Range 2 West, San Bernardino Base and Principal Meridian, more
particularly described as follows:
EASEMENT AREA "A"
BEGINNING at the most southerly corner of said Lot 81, being
a point in the northwesterly line of La Serena Way 88.00 feet
wide, being also a point on a curve concave northwesterly with
a radius of 956.00 feet, a radial to said point bears South
30010t02" East~ thence, along said curve through a central
angle of 3°44s06n an arc length of 62.32 feet to the most
easterly corner of said Lot 81~ thence, leaving said curve,
South 0
33 54t09s East 5.00 feet to a point on a curve concave
northwesterly with a radius of 961.00 feet, a radial to said
point bears South 33°54t09" East~ thence, along said curve
through a central angle of 3°44"06" an arc length of 62.65
feet~ thence, leaving said curve, North 30°10~02- West 5.00
feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
Said easement contains 312 square feet more or less.
' L.S. 5937
12/31/92
1ot81.eas
August 24, 1990
EXHIBIT "B"
°~
Recorded at request of and return to:
City Clerks Department
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
FREE RECORDING
This instrument is for the benefit of
the City of Temecula and is entitled
to be recorded without fee
(Govt. Code 6103).
IRREVOCABLE OFFER TO DEDICATE
Parcel:
APN # 9143100097
Project:
Tract 22148
FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged,
George Wimpey Inc. dba Morrison Homes
("Grantor"), hereby irrevocably offers to dedicate to the City of Temecula ("Grantee"), together
with the right to further grant or transfer the same to others, a perpetual easement and right-of way for
maintaining, operations, altering. repairing, and replacing equipment and landscaping over and within the
boundaries of that certain real property located in the City of Temecula, County of riverside, more particularly
described in Exhibit 'W' attached hereto, which is incorporated herein by this reference (the "Easement Area").
If GRANTEE, or its governmental entity, successors, or assigns, determines it is unable, incapable, or unwilling
to maintain said Easement Area, maintenance shall, after notice, become the responsibility of GRANTOR, with'
all covenants and agreements of this easemen extending to and becoming obligations of all heirs, executors,
DATED
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
n.~.l
, ~monel~ kno~ to me (or prorod to mo on ~o be~ of ae~fe~ e~en~e) ~ ~ ~e
pemon(s) ' ~re eu~c~d ~ ~e ~in in~ment ~nd ~eknowl~g~ ~ me ~e~ he!~e~ey exec~ ~e ~me ~ h~er~e~
eutho~ed cepe~Oes), end ~et by hi~er~eir ~neture(s) on ~e ins~ument ~e pe~on(s), or ~e en~ upon ~heff of ~ch ~e
pemon(s) ~, exec~ ~e in~menL
WITNESS hand an.d offi ' ea~:~~
Signature ~pt~ ~.
CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE
-This is to certify that the interest in real property conveyed by the within Irrevocable Offer To Dedicate to the City of Temecula, a
poliljcai corporation and/or govemmental agency, is hereby accepted by order of the City Council the date below and the Grantee
consents to the recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer.
Date
June S. Greek, City Clerk
EXHIBIT
Legal Description:
That portion of Lot 82 of Tract Number 22148 in the unincorporated
territory of Riverside County, as recorded June 22, 1989 in Book
202 'of Maps, at Pages 92-104, records of said county, state of
California, lying within a portion of Section 29, Township 7 South,
Range 2 West, San Bernardino Base and Principal Meridian, more
particularly described as follows:
EASEMENT AREA "A"
BEGINNING at the most southerly corner of said Lot 82, being
a point in the northwesterly line of La Serena Way 88.00 feet
wide, being also a point on a curve concave northwesterly with
a radius of 956.00 feet, a radial to said point bears South
33°54'09 East; thence, along said curve through a central
angle of 3°41'25" an arc length of 61.57 feet to the most
easterly corner of said Lot 82; thence, leaving said curve,
South 37°35'33" East 5.00 feet to a point on a curve concave
northwesterly with a radius of 961.00 feet, a radial to said
point bears South 37°35t33" East; thence, along said curve
through a central angle of 3e41'25" an arc length of 61.90
feet; thence, leaving said curve, North 33°54'09- West 5.00
feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
Said easement contains 312 square feet more or less.
L.S. 5937
lot82.eas
August 24, 1990
EXHIBIT" B '
Recorded at request of and return to:
City Clerks Department
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
~T._e_mecula, CA 92590
.,-'E RECORDING
This instrument is for the benefit of
the City of Temecula and is entitled
to be recorded without fee
(Govt. Cede 6103).
IRREVOCABLE OFFER TO DEDICATE
Parcel:
APN # 9143100097
Project:
Tract 22148
FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged,
George Wimpey Inc. dba Morrison Homes
("Grantor"), hereby irrevocably offers to dedicate to the City of Temecula ("Grantee"), together
with the right to further grant or transfer the same to others, a perpetual easement and right-of way for
maintaining, operations, altering, repairing, and replacing equipment and landscaping over and within the
boundaries of that certain real property located in the City of Temecula, County of riverside, more particularly
described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto, which is incorporated herein by this reference (the "Easement Area").
If GRANTEE, or its governmental entity, successors, or assigns, determines it is unable, incapable, or unwilling
to maintain said Easement Area, maintenance shall, after notice, become the responsibility of GRANTOR, with'
all covenants and agreements of this easement extending to and becoming obligations of all heirs, executors,
administrators, successors and o,~/~."~:R. assigns
ur U.F'.
GRANTOR
DATED
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
onI ) u~ore L~.e,i:~.e undersigned, A Notap/Public in and for the State of California, personally appeared
I~ ·, ~ ' I K, personally known to me (or preved te me en the baEk ef s~tisfactory evidence) to be the
person(~) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their
authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the enlity upon behalf of which the
person(s) acted, executed the instrumenL
CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE
This is to cerlffy that the interest in real property conveyed by the within Irrevocable Offer To Dedicate to the City of Temecula, a
political corporation and/or governmental agency, is hereby accepted by order of the City Council the date below and the Grantee
P'---ento to the recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer.
June S. Greek, City Clerk
EXHIBIT "A"
Legal Description:
That portion of Lot 85 of Tract ~mher 22148 in the unincorporated
territory of Riverside County, as recorded June 22, 1989 in Book
202 of Maps, at 'Pages 92-104, records of said county, state of
california, lying within a portion of Section 29, Town. ship 7 South,
Range 2 West, San Bernardino Base and Principal Meridian, more
particularly described as follows:
EASEMENT AREA
BEGINNING at the most southerly corner of said Lot 85, being
a point in the northwesterly line of Le Serena Way 88.00 feet
wide, being also a point on a curve concave northwesterly with
a radius of 956.00 feet, a radial to said point bears South
37°35~33" East~ thence, along said curve through a central
angle of 12°17~56" an arc length of 205.21 feet to the most
easterly corner of said Lot 85~ thence, leaving said curve,
South 49~53~29" East 5.00 feet to a point on a curve concave
northwesterly with a radius of 961.00 feet, a radial to said
point bears South 49°53e29- East~ thence, along said curve
through a central angle of 12°17~56" an arc length of 206.28
feet~ thence, leaving said curve, North 37~35~33- West 5.00
feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
Said easement contains 1,029 square feet more or less.
lot85.eas
August 24, 1990
EXHIBIT" B"
ENCt4I!IS - FtaANNIIS - ~S ~151 .Mt'EhlOA ENCINA5. SUITE A. CAI~. CALIIIC2
RecOrded at request of and return to:
City Clerks Department
City of Ternecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Ternecula, CA 92590
FREE RECORDING
This instrument is for the benefit of
the City of Ternecula and is entitled
to be recorded without fee
(Govt. Code 6103).
IRREVOCABLE OFFER TO DEDICATE
Parcel:
APN # 9143100097
Project:
Tract 22148 LOT ~
FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged,
George Wimpey Inc. dba Morrison Homes
("Grantor"), hereby irrevocably offers to dedicate to the City of Temecula ("Grantee"), together
with the right to further grant or transfer the same to others, a perpetual easement and right-of way for
maintaining, operations, altering, repairing, and replacing equipment and landscaping over and within the
boundaries of that certain real property located in the City of Temecula, County of riverside, more particularly
described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto, which is incorporated herein by this reference (the "Easement Area"),
If GRANTEE, or its governmental entity, successors, or assigns, determines it is unable, incapable, or unwilling
to maintain said Easement Area, maintenance shall, after notice, become the responsibility of GRANTOR, With'
all covenants and agreements of this easement extending to and becoming obligations of all heirs, executors,
administrators, successors and assigns of th TOR.
DATED
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
~ 4~ {~ ~ undersigned, A Notary Public in and for the State of Califomia personally appeared
authorized capacitydes), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instmrnent the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the
person(s) acted, executed the instrurnenL
CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE
This is to certify that the interest in real property conveyed by the within Irrevocable Offer To Dedicate to the City of Temecula, ·
political corporation and/or governmental agency, is hereby accepted by order of the City Council the date below and the Grantee
consents to the recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer. ~"'-
Date
June S. Greek, City Clerk
EXHIBIT
Legal Description:
That portion of Lot 86 of Tract Number 22148 in the unincorporated
territory of Riverside County, as recorded June 22, 1989 in Book
202 of Maps, at Pages 92-104, records of said county, state of
California, lying within a portion of Section 29, Township 7 South,
Range 2 West, San Bernardino Base and Principal Meridian, more
particularly described as follows:
~EMEZ'.i"E ~ ~AN
BEGINNING at the most southerly corner of said Lot 86, being
a point in the northwesterly line of La Serena Way 88.00 feet
wide, being also a point on a curve concave northwesterly with
a radius of 956.00 feet, a radial to said point bears South
49°53t29u East; thence, along said curve through a central
angle of 2°18s54u an arc length of 38.63 feet to the end of
said curve; thence, tangent to said curve, North 37'47t37-
East 18.17 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave
southeasterly with a radius of 1644.00 feet, a radial to said
point bears North 52'12823" West; thence, along said curve
through a central angle of 5*08~42" an arc length of 147,63
feet to the most easterly corner of said Lot 86; thence,
leaving said curve and said northwesterly line of La Serena
Way, South 47'03841" East 5.00 feet to a point on a curve
concave southeasterly with a radius of 1639.00,00 feet, a
radial to said point bears North 47'03841w West; thence,
along said curve through a central angle of 5*08842" an arc
length of 147.18 feet to the end of curve; thence, tangent
to said curve, South 37'47837" West 18.17 feet to a point,
said point being the beginning of a tangent curve concave
northwesterly with a radius of 961.00 feet, a radial to said
point bears South49*53t29u East; thence, leaving said curve,
North 49'53~29" West 5.-00 Zeet to the POINT OF 'BEGINNING.
Said easement contains 1,021 square feet more or less.
· S. 5937
L12/31/92
1ot86.eas
August.24, 1990
EXHIBIT" B"
(2:3,z ~. 19 Per
.,e,W. 7~/ZZ-Z:~.
,-,,,,%
.~00.26' "' 69.
//0
~ /'I.,? ~. 413&j/~' 38- 20'
Recorded at request of and return to:
City Clerks Department
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
· :E RECORDING
This instrument is for the benefit of
the City of Temecula and is entitled
to be recorded without fee
(GovL Code 6103).
Parcel:
APN # 9143100097
Project
Tract22148 LOT 110
- IRREVOCABLE OFFER TO DEDICATE
FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION. receipt of which is hereby acknowledged,
George Wimpey Inc. dba Morrison Homes
("Grantor''), hereby irrevocably offers to dedicate to the City of Temecula ("Grantee"), together
with the right to further grant or transfer the same to others, a perpetual easement and right-of way for
maintaining, operations, altering, repairing, and replacing equipment and landscaping over and within the
boundaries of that certain real property located in the City of Temecula, County of riverside, more particularly
described in Exhibit 'W' attached hereto, which is incorporated herein by this reference (the "Easement Area").
If GRANTEE, or its governmental entity, successors, or assigns, determines it is unable, incapable, or unwilling
to maintain said Easement Area, maintenance shall, after notice, become the responsibility of GRANTOR, with
all covenants and agreements of this easement extending to and becoming obligations of all heirs, executors,
and assigns of t e OR.
administrators, successors ~~/~/~U ~' ?
3 J l q 6RANToR
DATED
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
su~cdbe~ to ~e ~in in~ment and ackno~g~ W me ~at he~h~ey exec~ ~ gme h hler~
author~ed capac~Oes), and ~at by hi~er~eir signa~re(s) on ~e inmment ~e ~mon(s), or ~e en~ u~p ~half of ~ ~e
pemon(s) a~ed, exec~ed ~e ins~menL
WITNESS m hand an.d offic' se_.~C~,~
Signature ~
CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE
This is to certify that the interest in real property conveyed by the within Irrevocable Offer To Dedicate to the City of Temecula, a
political corporation and/or governmental agency, is hereby accepted by order of the City Council the date below and the Grantee
-'-'~ents to the recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer.
June S. Greek, City Clerk
PARCEL ~A~
PORTION OF LOT 110 OF TRACT NUMBER 22148 IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA,
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, AS RECORDED JUNE 22, 1989 IN BOOK 202 OF MAPS, AT
PAGES 92-104, RECORDS OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, LYING WITHIN A PORTION OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH,
RANGE 2 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, AND MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 110, SAID CORNER
ALSO BEING A POINT IN A CURVE CONCAVE SOTJTHEASTERLY WITH A RADIUS
OF 1644.00 FEET, A RADIAL TO SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 47°03'41" WEST;.'
THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAD LOT 110, NORTH 77°27'51"
WEST A DISTANCE OF 1.90 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID SOIYrHWESTERLY LINE,
NORTH 37°33'29, EAST A DISTANCE OF 26.45 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A
OJRVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY WITH A RADIUS OF 1648.31 Fl~rr, A RADIAL
LINE BEARS TO SAID POINT NORTH 46° 10'46' WEST; THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE
THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 2°04'00' AN ARC LENGTH OF 59.45 FEET TO A
POINT IN THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT 22148; THENCE LEAVING SAID
CURVE, ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE, SOUTH 89°31'16" EAST A DISTANCE OF
6.15 FEET TO THE MOST EASTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 110, SAID CORNER ALSO
BEING A POINT IN THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF LOT 'F" OF SAID TRACT 22148,
SAID POINT ALSO BEING IN A NONTANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY
WITH A RADIUS OF 1644.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE TO SAID POINT BEARS NORTH
43°57'37" WEST; TI~-NCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAm CURVE THROUGH A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 3°06'04" (3°06'03" PER SAID TRACT NUMBER 22148) AN ARC
LENGTH OF 88.98 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
SAD PARCEL CONTAINS 342.0 SQUARE FEET, 0,008 ACRES MORE OR LESS.
SUBJECT TO AT L COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESERVATIONS, RESTRICTIONS,
RIGHTS, RIGHTS OF WAY AND EASEMENTS, IF ANY, OF RECORD.
SEE EXHIBIT "B" ATI'ACI-IF-D I-IF~RETO AND BY THIS RI::-FERENCE MADE A PART
HEREOF.
PARCEL"B"
PORTION OF LOT "F" OF TRACT NUMBER 22148 IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA,
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, AS RECORDED JUNE 22, 1989 IN BOOK 202 OF MAPS, AT
PAGES 92-104, RECORDS OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAD COUNTY, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, LYING W1THIN A PORTION OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH,
RANGE 2 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, AND MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER OF LOT 110 OF SAID TRACT
NUMBER 22148, SAID CORNER ALSO BEING A POINT ON THE NORTHWESTERLY
LINE OF SAID LOT 'F', SAID POINT ALSO BEING IN A CURVE CONCAVE
SOUTHEASTERLY WITH A RADIUS OF 1644.00 FF-ET, A RADIAL LINE TO SAID
POINT BEARS NORTH 47°03'41* WEST; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID
CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 3°06'04" (3°06'03" PER SAID TRACT
NUMBER 22148) AN ARC DISTANCE OF 88.98 FEET TO THE MOST EASTERLY
CORNER OF LOT 110 OF SAID TRACT NUMBER 22148, SAID CORNER ALSO BEING
A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT NUMBER 22148; THENCE
ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE, SOUTH 89°31'16" EAST A DISTANCE OF 7.15 FEET
TO A POINT IN A NONTANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY WITH A
RADIUS OF 1639.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE TO SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 43°46'54"
WEST; THENCE SOUTHWES~Y ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF 3°16'47" AN ARC LENGTH OF 93.82 F~-~:T; THENCE LEAVING SAID-'
CURVE NORTH 47°03'41" WEST A DISTANCE OF 5.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
SAID PARCEL CONTAINS 457 SQUARE FEET, 0.011 ACRES MORE OR LESS.
SUBJECT TO ALL COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RES~VATIONS, RESTRICTIONS,
RIGHTS, RIGHTS OF WAY AND EASF_,MI~-NTS, IF ANY, OF RECORD.
SEE EXI-HBIT "B" ATrACI-II:-D I.-IF-RETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART
HF~REOF.
Date
RCE 23080
Exp. 12/31/97
i i zzo
i
I .~
i -
i
Lot 109
I
I
I '1
' -- 4,, _ ~-~7'~, I
I "---,. 'it' I
I
Scole: 1' -50'
I r'- //
O~ / L .
II I ~,~ /////i / {:)
I // ./~/
_~'~/// / UNE DIRECTION DISTANCE
/ 1,2 N3733'29'" E
R 80
12/31/97
Expires
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE EASEIv.,,
Portions of Lot 110 and Lot 'F' of
Tract 22148 reearded June 22, 1989
as ehewn by map filed in Beak 202,
Pages 92-104 of Maps. meanis of the
County Recorder, Riverside County. State
of Carifomia.
Recorded at request of and return to:
City Clerks Department
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
EE RECORDING
'this instrument is for the benefit of
the City of Temecula and is entitled
to be recorded without fee
(Govt. Cede 6103).
IRREVOCABLE OFFER TO DEDICATE
Parcel:
APN it 9143100097
Project:
Tract 22148
FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged,
George Wimpey Inc. dba Morrison Homes
("Grantor"), hereby irrevocably offers to dedicate to the City of Temecula ("Grantee"), together
with the right to further grant or transfer the same to others, a perpetual easement and right-of way for
maintaining, operations, altering, repairing, and replacing equipment and landscaping over and within the
boundaries of that certain real property located in the City of Temecula, County of riverside, more particularly
described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto, which is incorporated herain by this reference (the "Easement Area").
If GRANTEE or its governmental entity, successors, or assigns, determines it is unable, incapable, or unwilling
to maintain said Easement Area, maintenance shall, after notice, become the responsibility of GRANTOR, with..
all c?v.enants and agreements of this. easement extend' ng and becoming obligations of all heirs, executors,
administrators, successors and asmgns of ~~~~, ,~.~. ..
DATED
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
, personally known to me (or proved to me on be basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the
ri instrument and acknowledged to me that he/sheA~iey executed the same in his~erAheir
()
authorized capacityOes), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the
person(s) acted, executed the instrumenL
::E e
CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE
This is to cerUfy that the interest in real property conveyed by the within Irrevocable Offer To Dedicate to the City of Temecula, a
political corporation and/or governmental agency, is hereby accepted by order of the City Council the date below and the Grantee
cAasents to the recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer.
June S. Greek, City Clerk
LOT 96
PORTION OF LOT 96 OF TRACT NUMBER 22148 IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA,
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, AS RECORDED JUNE 22, 1989 IN BOOK 202 OF MAPS, AT
PAGES 92-104, RECORDS OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, LYING WITHIN A PORTION OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP ? SOUTH,
RANGE 2 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, AND MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHW~TERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 96, SAID CORNER
ALSO BEING TIIE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF LOT 97 AND BEING A POINT ON
THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF LOT 'E' OF SAID TRACT NUMBER 22148; THENCE:
ALONG THE COMMON LOT LINE OF SAID LOT 96 AND LOT 97, NORTH 42° 18'57"
EAST A DISTANCE OF 18.35 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID COMMON LOT LINE OF
SAID LOT 96 AND SAID LOT 97, SOUTH 83°36'19' EAST A DISTANCE OF 2.50 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 53° 10'02" EAST A DISTANCE OF 50.35 FEET; THENCE SOUTH
31056'37" EAST A DISTANCE OF 44.70 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 84°03'21" EAST A
DISTANCE OF 26.73 FEET; THI:-NCE SOUTH 47°41'03" EAST A DISTANCE OF 3.22
FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF LOT "G" OF SAID TRACT
NUMBER 22148; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHWESTERLY LINE SOUTH 42018'57"
WEST A DISTANCE OF 14.35 FI~.I~TI'; 'rHI:-NCE SOUTH 85° 11'41" WEST A DISTANCE
OF 19.10 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF LOT "E" OF SAID
TRACT NUMBER 22148; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE NORTH
4'7°41 '03" WEST A DISTANCE OF 106.91 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
SAID PARCEL CONTAINS 2390.5 SQUARE FEET, 0.055 ACRES MORE OR LESS.
SUBJECT TO ALL COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESERVATIONS, RESTRICTIONS,
RIGHTS, RIGHTS OF WAY AND EASEMENTS, IF ANY, OF RECORD.
23080
March 31, 1995
File No. wp51\mor96.1gl
Scab: 1' ,- 50'
Lot 97 \\ /
~
~ \ ~/'
'\ /~ Lot 95
\ // \\ \\\ /'
B x ot 9e'-, ,·
'~ e~ ~ / /'~,
o s ~ '~"z ~- ~ /
o ~ ~ Lot 80 "~', 82
. .- . ~.. : >./'
· '~ .
L4 ~ ~ed
L5 ~; ~ed . '
L6 ~ ~ed
L7 NB~36'Zg*V ~0' .
L8 ~rO2*E ~5~ ·
L9 ~*~37'V 44,70'
U5 $47'4~'~ ~r ~ "
~ ~*~'4~ ~93' '
U7 N 4'39'~ E7.~'
~O S47'4~'03'~ 7.33' .
P~ d ~ 96,
~ ~ Ju~ :, 1989 ~ eh~ ~ map
~ in ~ 20~ ~ge 92-1~
~ ef ~e ~un~ R~er,
s ~/e/ee ~un~, S~ ~ ~lffom~.
.~corde;d at request of and return to:
.'ity Clerks Department
City of Ternecula
43174 Business Perk Ddve
Ternecula, CA 92590
FREE RECORDING
This instrument is for the benefit of
the City of Temecula and is entitled
to be recorded without fee
{Govt. Code 6103).
IRREVOCABLE OFFER TO DEDICATE
Parcel:
Lot: 97
Project: Tr act
22148
FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDEBATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged,
Lucas & Mercier Development, In~.
("Grantor"), hereby irrevocably offers to dedicate to the City of Temecula ("Grantee"),'together
with the' right to further grant or transfer the same to others, a perpetual easement and right-of-way for
maintaining, operating, altering, repairing, and replacing equipment and landscaping over and within the boundaries
of that certain real property located in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, more particularly described in
Exhibit "A" attached hereto, which is incorporated herein by this reference.-{the "Easement Area").
If GRANTEE, or its governmental entity, successors, or assigns, determines it is unable, incapable, or unwilling to
maintain said Easement Area, maintenance shall, after notice, become the responsibility of GRANTOR, with all'
covenants and agreements of this easement extending to and bel;;oming obligations of all heirs, executors,
administrators, successors and assigns of the GRANTOR.
GRANTOR
March 28, 1995
DATED
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
On before me, the undersigned, A Notary Public in and for the State of California, personally'
.appeared . personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of
satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized .capacity(ies), and that by
his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted,
executed the instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Signature
CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE
This is to certify that the interest in real property conveyed by the within Irrevocable Offer To Dedicate to the City of
Temecula, a political corporation and/or governmental agency, is hereby accepted by order of the City Council the date below
and the Grantee consents to the recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer.
Date
June S. Greek, City Clerk
3~'feemm'iff. vA~ed
013182
CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT
State of California
County of Orange
On 3-28-95 before me, Terri L. Roman ,
Dam NameBndTilteotOIcmr(e.g.,'JaneDoe, NotatyPtmlc')
personally appeared Rick E. Metclef ,
Name(s) d S~gne~s)
~ personally known to me - OR - [] proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s)
whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument
and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the
same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by
his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s),
or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted,
executed the instrument.
OPTIONAL
Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent
fraudulent ram/and reabechment of this form to another document.
Description of Attached Document
Title or Type of Document:
Document Date:
Signer(s) Other Than Named Above:
Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s)
Signer's Name:
[] Individual
[] Corporate Officer
Title(s):
[] Partner- [] Limited [] General
[] Attorney-in-Fact
[] Trustee
[] Guardian or Conservator
[] Other: Top of thumb here
Signer Is Representing:
Number of Pages:
Signer's Name:
[] Individual
[] Corporate Officer
Title(s):
[] Partner .--[] Limited [] General
[] Attorney-in-Fact
[] Trustee
[] Guardian or Conservator ~
[] Other: Top of thumb here
Signer is Representing:
1994 Natloni Notary ,~_e__e,'j,c~_.JX3n · 8236 I~ Ave., P.O. Box 7184 · C,,inog8 Park, CA 91309-7184 Plod. No. 5907 I~. Call ToP-Free 1.~00-~
LOT 97
PORTION OF LOT 97 OF TRACT NUMBER 22148 IN THE CITY OF TEMECUL~,
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, AS RECORDED JUNE 22, 1989 IN BOOK 202 OF MAPS, AT
PAGES 92-104, RECORDS OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, LYING WITHIN A PORTION OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH,
RANGE 2 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, AND MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 97, SAID CORNER
BEING ALSO THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF LOT 96 AND BEING A POINT ON
THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF LOT "E" OF SAID TRACT NUMBER 22148; THENCE
ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE NORTH 47°41'03" .'WEST A DISTANCE OF
105.09 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 97, NORTH
04°39'33" WEST A DISTANCE OF 20.52 FEET TO A POINT-ON THE SOUTHEASTERLY
LINE OF LOT "H" OF SAID TRACT NUMBER 22148; THENCE ALONG SAID
SOUTHEASTERLY LINE NORTH 42°18'57" EAST A DISTANCE OF 11.65 FEEt;
THENCE LEAVING SAID SOUTHEASTERLY I.,INE, SOUTH 05°55'16" EAST A
DISTANCE OF 27.68 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 47°56'21" EAST A DISTANCE OF 84;60
FEET; THENCE SOUTH 83e36'19" EAST 18.33 FEET TO A POINT ON THE COMMON
LOT LINE OF SAD LOT 97 AND SAD LOT 96; THENCE ALONG SAID COMMOM LOT
LINE OF SAD LOT 97 AND SAD LOT 96, SOUTH 42° 18'57" WEST A DISTANCE OF
18.35 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
SAD PARCEL CONTAINS 1053.1 SQUARE FEET, 0.024 ACRES MORE OR LESS.
SUBJECT TO ALL COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESERVATIONS, RESTRICTIONS,
RIGHTS, RIGHTS OF WAY AND EASEMENTS, IF ANY, OF RECORD.
Exp. 12/31/97
March 31, 1995
File No. ~vp51Xmor97.1gl
Scale: 1' '= 50'
:/' \\\\ ~/.
l/x,,\\ 95 \,\\\ . .,/.
Lot j~ k ~ . /
..~ k ~ ./' :
~/' ,,,or 82
'~ ./' , Lot 81 ""-,
.
e
% · . :- ·
~; "~
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE EASEMENT
Portion of lot 97 of Troct 2.2148
recorded June 2.2. 1989 oe shown by mop
filed In Book 202. ~ 92-104 of Mop8.
recurde of the County Recorder, Riverskl
County. ~ of Colifomla.
'Recgrjed at request of and return to:
City Clerks Department
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
FREE RECORDING
This instrument is for the benefit of
the City of Temecula and is entitled
to be recorded without fee
{Govt. Code 6103).
IRREVOCABLE OFFER TO DEDICATE
Parcel:
Lots: 163,164,165,16(
Project: Tract 22148
FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDEBATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged,
T,L1CRS '~, Mt~rc'i tmr 'r')~trm~l nprn~n'l- , Tllc
("Grantor'), hereby irrevocably offers to dedicate to the City of Temecula ('Grantee"), together
with the' right to further grant or transfer the same to others, a perpetual easement and right-of-way for
maintaining, operating, altering, repairing, and replacing equipment and landscaping over and within the boundaries
of that certain real property located in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, more particularly described in
Exhibit "A" attached hereto, which is incorporated herein by this reference (the "Easement Area").
If GRANTEE, or its governmental entity, successors, or assigns, determines it is unable, incapable, or unwilling to
maintain said Easement Area, maintenance shall, after notice, become the responsibility of GRANTOR, with all.
covenants and agreements of this easement extending to and bBcoming obligations of all heirs, executors,
administrators, successors and assigns of the ~,~:~OR.
R~ck ~cier E
March 28, 1995
DATED
GRANTOR
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
On before me, the undersigned, A Notary Public in and for the State of California, personally
.appeared , personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of
satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized .capacity(lee), and that by
his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted,
executed the instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Signature
CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE
This is to certify that the interest in real property conveyed by the within Irrevocable Offer To Dedicate to the City
Temecula, a political Corporation and/or governmental agency, is hereby accepted by order of the City Council the date below
and the Grantee consents to the recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer.
Date ',,,
June S. Greek, City Clerk
3elfon~mAr~ev .eed 013192
CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT
State of C~ 1 t forn'i a
County of
On 3-28-95 before me,
pemonally appeared R~ck ~.. Merc~er
Terr$ L. lioman
N~me,ndTlae~OBmt(e.g..',aneO~e. NmwyPul~
Name(s) ae S~}neqs)
personally known to me - OR - [] proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s)
whose name(s) is/ara subscribed to the within instrument
and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the
same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by
his/her/their signatura(s) on the instrument the person(s),
or the entity upon, behalf of which the person(s) acted,
executed the instrument.
WITNES ' .
OPTIONAL
Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent
fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another documanL
Description of Attached Document
Title or Type of Document:
Document Date:
Signer(s) Other Than Named Above:
Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s)
Signer's Name:
[] Individual
[] Corporate Officer
Title(s):
[] Partner--[] Limited [] General
[] Attorney-in-Fact
[] Trustee
[] Guardian or Conservator
[] Other:
Top of ~umb hem
Number of Pages:
Signer's Name:
[] Individual
r--; Corporate Officer
Title(s):
[] Partner- [] Limited [] General
[] Attorney-in-Fact
[] Trustee
[] Guardian or Conservator ~
[] Other: Top of thumb here
Signer Is Representing:
Signer Is Representing:
O 1994 National Nolmy AMocialion * 8236 Reinroe Ave., P.O. Box 7184 · Canoga ParIt, CA 91309-7184 Prod. No. 5907 Reoa:lec C41 Tel-Free 1-800-r/6-6827
PARCEL "A"
THOSE PORTIONS OF LOT 163, LOT 164, LOT 165 AND LOT 166 OF TRACT NIJMBER
22148 IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, AS RECORDED JUNE
22, 1989 IN BOOK 202 OF MAPS, AT PAGES 92-104, RECORDS OF THE COUNTY
RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, LYING WI'I}IIN A PORTION
OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 2 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE
AND PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 166, SAID
SOUTHERLY CORNER BEING ALSO A POINT ON THE NORTHEASTERLY LNE OF
LOT "E" OF SAID TRACT NUMBER 22148; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY.'
LINE, NORTH 47° 41 '03" WEST A DISTANCE OF 147.55 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID
NORTHEASTERLY LINE, NORTH 10°40'12" EAST A DISTANCE OF 30.35 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 08°24'29" EAST A DISTANCE OF 32.89 Fl=-gr TO A POINT ON THE
NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 166, SAID POINT BEING ALSO ON THE SOUTHERLY
LINE OF SAD LOT 165 AND BEING SOUTH 62° 19'30" EAST A DISTANCE OF 15.21
FF:.F-T FROM THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 165; THENCE
CONTINUING NORTH 08°24'29" EAST A DISTANCE OF 4.94 FEET; TI-n=-NCE NORTH
11055'54" EAST A DISTANCE OF 30.29 FI=.RT TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY LINE
OF SAID LOT 165, SAID POINT ALSO BEING ON THE SOUTI-r!=-RLY LINE OF SAID LOT
164 AND BEING SOUTH 75°42'15" EAST A DISTANCE OF 14.01 FEET FROM THE
SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 164; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH
11055'54" EAST A DISTANCE OF 16.84 Fl=-gr; TI-TgNCE NORTH 10°40'12" EAST A
DISTANCE OF 43.51 FEET; THENCE NORTH 18°49'00" EAST A DISTANCE OF 3.47
FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAD LOT 164, SAD POINT BEING
ALSO ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 163 AND BEING SOUTH 77°27'51"
EAST A DISTANCE OF 12.79 FEET FROM THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF SAID
LOT 163; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 18049'00" EAST A DISTANCE OF 36.94 FF-gr;
THENCE SOUTH 09° 12'30" WEST A DISTANCE OF 36.78 Fl=.gr TO A POINT ON THE
SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 163, SAID POINT ALSO BEING ON THE NORTI-rF-RLY
LINE OF SAID LOT 164; TI-rI=-NCE CONTINUING SOUTH 09° 12'30" WEST A DISTANCE
OF 2.16 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 11°12'58" WEST A DISTANCE OF 44.13 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 12° 14'57" WEST A DISTANCE OF 17.69 Fl=-gr TO A POINT ON THE
SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 164, SAID POINT BEING ALSO ON THE NORTHF-RLY
LINE OF SAID LOT 165; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 12° 14'57" WEST A DISTANC!E
OF 36.57 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 165, SAID POINT BEING
ALSO ON THE NORTHI=~RLY LINE OF SAID LOT 166; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH
12° 14'57" WEST A DISTANCE OF 63.12 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 67049'50" EAST A
DISTANCE OF 68.53 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 41002'27" EAST A DISTANCE OF 62.04
FEET; THENCE SOUTH 08° 12'53" EAST A DISTANCE OF 11.77 FEET; THENCE SOUTH
84°51'41" EAST A DISTANCE OF 23.37 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 47041'03" EAST A
File No. wpSl\mor163-6.1gl
DISTANCE OF 5.82 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTI-~ASTEP, LY LINE OF SAID LOT
166, SAID POINT ALSO BEING ON THE NOR~Y LINE OF LOT "H" OF SAID
TRACT NUMBER 22148; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHWESTERLY LINE, SOUTH
42° 18'57" WEST A DISTANCE OF 9.07 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89° 17'27" WEST 20.52
~ TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
SAD PARCEL CONTAINS 3,418.1 SQUARE I~-R:T, 0.079 ACRES MORE OR LESS.
SUBtCT TO ALL COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESERVATIONS, RESTRICTIONS,
RIGHTS, RIGHTS OF WAY AND EASEMt:-NTS, IF ANY, OF RECORD.
SEE EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERErO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART
HEREOF.
PARCEL "B"
THOSE PORTIONS OF LOT "E" AND LOT "H" OF TRACT NUMBER 22148 IN THE CITY
OF TE1VIECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, AS RECORDED JUNE 22, 1989 IN BOOK 202
OF MAPS, AT PAGES 92-104, RECORDS OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID
COUNTY, STATE OF CAI.IFORNIA, LYING WITHIN A PORTION OF SECTION 29,
TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 2 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND PRINCIPAL
MERIDIAN, AND MORE PARTICLFLARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTH!u~ASTERLY CORNER OF LOT 166 OF SAID TRACT
NUMBER 22148, SAID SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER BEING ALSO A POINT ON THE
NORTH EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT "E"; TItENCE LEAVING SAID
NORTItEASTERLY I.INE NORTH-89° 17'27" EAST A DISTANCE OF 20.52 Fl:.l:rr TO A
POINT ON THE NORTHVv'ESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT "H" ; THENCE LEAVING SAID
NORT~TERLY LINE, SOUTH 47°41'03" EAST A DISTANCE OF 7.33 FI~.I?r;
TI-tENCE SOUTH 89°17'27" WF, ST A DISTANCE OF 27.85 lq:~l:;iT; TItF-NCE NORTH
47°41'03" WF.,ST A DISTANCE 167.43 FI:-I:~T; TItENCE NORTH 12°32'09" EAST A
DISTANCE OF 5.76 FEET TO A POINT ON A NONTANGENT CURVE CONCAVE
NORTHEASTERLY WITH RADIUS OF 267.00 FEET, SAID POINT BEING ALSO THE
SOIEHWESTERLY CORNER OF LOT 166 OF SAID TRACT NUMBER 22148, THE
RADIAL LINE TO SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 42°27'48" WEST; THENCE
SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAD CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 00° 08'51 '
AN ARC DISTANCE OF 0. 69 FEET; THENCE TANGENT TO SAm CURVE ALONG THE
SOIEHWESTERLY LINE OF LOT 166 OF SAID TRACT NUMBER 22148, SOUTH
47°41'03" EAST A DISTANCE OF 167.64 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
SAID PARCEL CONTAINS 960.1 SQUARE FEET, 0.022 ACE MORE OR LESS.
File No. wpSl\mor163-6.1gl
SUBJECT TO ALL COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESERVATIONS, RESTRICTIONS,
RIGHTS, RIGHTS OF WAY AND EASEMENTS, IF ANY, OF RECORD.
EXHIBIT "B" ATrACI-n=,r} I-tHeRETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART
I-rF~REOF.
,.No. 2~08.0 ~1i
F~e No. wpSl\mor163-6.lgl
Lot 162
A
UNE DIRECTION ~/'0
L1 N10'4O'12"E 30.35' ~~ \ /
L2 S 8'24'29"W 32,89' '
1,3 N 8'24'29"E: 4.94'
L4 S11'55'54°W
L5 N11'55'5~'E 16.84'
L6 $1 ff40'12"W 43,51'
N1~49'
L7 00' 3.47'
L8 NI$4g~O'E 3,94'
1,9 $ 9'12'30'W 36,78'
LIO N 9'12'30'E 2.16'
Lll Sl1'12'58'W 44,13'
L12 $1~14'57'W 17.69'
L13 S12' 14'57" W 38.57*
L14 $1~14'57"W 63.12'
kl 5 S67'49'50" E 68.53'
L16 S41'02'27" E 62.04'
L17 S 8'12'53'E 11.77'
L18 SB,F51'41'E 23.37'
kl 9 S,I,7'41 '03' E 5.82'
120 N 42' 18'57" E 9.07'
121 NBO'17'27"E 20,~2'
L22 S47'41'03"E 7.$3'
123 S89'17'27"W 27,85'
talatl~
EXHIBIT "B"
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE EASEMENT
Portion, of Lot 163. Let 164 Lot 165,
Let 166, Lot 'E', and Lot ,~ft, of
Tract 2214~ recorded June 22, 1989
as shown by mop filed in Book 202.
Page 92-10~ of Maps, records of the
County Recorcler. Riveaide County, St~e
of California.
Lot 97
\
%
\
\
\
\
\
%.
\
scow: 1' -' 50' ~~,~7~ Lot 163 " ,~,
v ~,~~ ;""' -, ~/
· ~s'42'x~;;tS ffcj~ '~' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' - - -~'/
'~.\
. , ------__~/
~ ~t 16~ : ~/
, ~;...~ -. - __ _ _
Recorded at request of and return to:
City Clerks Department
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
FREE RECORDING
This instrument is for the benefit of
the City of Temecula and is enffied
to be recorded without fee
(Govt. Cede 6103).
IRREVOCABLE OFFER TO DEDICATE
Parcel:
APN # 9143100097
Project:
Tract 22148
L l~':,l~ -* ~
FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged,
George Wimpey Inc. dba Morrison Homes
("Grantor'), hereby irrevocably offers to dedicate to the City of Temecula ("Grantee"), together
with the right to furlher grant or transfer the same to others, a perpetual easement and right-of way for
maintaining, operations, altering, repairing, and replacing equipment and landscaping over and within the
boundaries of that certain real property located in the City of Temecula, County of riverside, more particularly
described in Exhibit 'W' attached hereto, which is incorporated herein by this reference (the "Easement Area").
If GRANTEE, or its govemmental entity, successors, or assigns, determines it is unable, incapable, or unwilling
to maintain said Easement Area, maintenance shall, after notice, become the responsibility of GRANTOR, with,,
all covenants and agreements of this easement exte ng to and becoming obligations of all heirs, executors,
administrators, successors and assigns of th
k)'~'~r ,~'
)
DATED
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
On r ~ }c~q ~) b ore e ~e undersigned, A Notan/Public in and for the State of Califomia, personally appeared
I'J '~,;.~',.L"~a kC~ ~.' . perso.ally k.o,,., to .,. Cor pro,,ed to ,-. on th. ba.-.is of .,.~.=,,/.~..c.) to be th.
authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the enffiy upon behalf of which the
person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
WITNESS ~
Signature ~
CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE
This is to certify that the interest in real property conveyed by the within Irrevocable Offer To Dedicate to the City ofTemecula, a
political corporation and/or governmental agency, is hereby accepted by order of the City Council the date below and the Grantee
consents to the recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer. "'
Date
June S. Greek, City Clerk
EXHIBIT "A"
LOT 167, LOT 168, LOT 169 AND THOSE PORTIONS OF LOT A OF TRACT NUMBER
22148 IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, AS RECORDED IUNE
22, 1989 IN BOOK 202 OF MAPS, AT PAGES 92-104, RECORDS OF THE COUNTY
RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, LYING WITHIN A PORTION
OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 2 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE
AND PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
PARCEL "A"
LOT 167
SAID PARCEL CONTAINS 31,132 SQUARE FEET, 0.715 ACRES MORE OR LESS.
PARCEL"B"
LOT 168
SAID PARCEL CONTAINS 6,045 SQUARE FEET, 0.139 ACRES MORE OR LESS.
PARCEL "C"
LOT 169
SAID PARCEL CONTAINS 1,189 SQUARE FEET, 0.027 ACRF_~ MORE OR LESS.
PARCEL"D"
BEGINNING AT THE MOST SOUTI-~-RLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 167, SAID
SOUTI-~RLY CORNER, B1=,tNG ALSO A POINT ON THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF
SAID LOT "A; THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE, SOUTH 12°32'09"
WEST A DISTANCE OF 7.61 ~ TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF A
NONTANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY WITH RADIUS OF 272.00 FEET,
THE RADIAL LINE TO SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 60°52'27" WEST; THENCE
NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 36°04'56* AN
ARC DISTANCE OF 171.29 FEET; THENCE TANGENT TO SAID CURVE NORTH
6°57'23" EAST A DISTANCE OF 221.69 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OP A TANGENT
CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY WITH RADIUS OF 328.00FEET; ~CE NORTI-IF~RLY
AND NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAD CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
36°04'21" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 206.50 I~.I:~T; THENCE TANGENT TO SAD CURVE
NORTH 29°06'58" WEST A DISTANCE OF 19.97 FEET; THENCE NORTH 13°54'53"EAST
A DISTANCE OF 24.90' FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID
Fiis No. wl~!~otl6'Lg.Igl
TRACT 22 148; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE SOUTH 29°08'03" EAST
A DISTANCE OF 7.32 FEET TO THE MOST NORTHERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 167;
THENCE ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF LOT SAID 167, SOUTH 13°54'53" WEST
A DISTANCE OF 17.58 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 29°06'58" EAST A DISTANCE OF 18.00
FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY WITH
RADIUS OF 333.00 FF-Frr; THENCE SOUTH EASTERLY AND SOUTHERLY ALONG THE
CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 36°04'21" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 209.65
FEET; THENCE TANGENT TO SAID CURVE SOUTH 6°57'23" WEST A DISTANCE OF
221.69 FEET TO THE BEGBq'NING OF A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE
NORTHEASTERLY WITH RADIUS OF 267.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG
SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 34°51'42" AN ARC DISTANCE OF
162.46 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
SAID PARCEL CONTAINS 3,182.7 SQUARE FEET, 0.073 ACRES MORE OR LESS.
PARCEL "E"
BEGINNING AT THE MOST NORTHERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 168, BEING ALSO
A POINT ON THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT 22148; THENCE ALONG
THE NORTHWF_,STERLY LINE OF LOT SAID 168, SOUTH 13°54'33" WEST A DISTANCE
OF 17.31 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 29°06'58" EAST A DISTANCE OF 495.57 FEET;
TI-IF~NCE SOUTH 72°08'28" EAST A DISTANCE OF 17.55 FEET TO A POINT ON THE
NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT 22148; THENCE ALONG SAID
NORTHF~STERLY LINE SOUTH 29 °08 '0~3" EAST A DISTANCE OF 7.33 FEET; THENCE
LEAVING SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE, NORTH 72°08'28"WEST A DISTANCE OF
24.88 FEET; THENCE NORTH 29°06'58" WEST A DISTANCE OF 499.51 FEET; THENCE
NORTH 13°54'33" .EAST A DISTANCE OF 24.63 FEET TO A POINT ON THE
NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT NU1VIBER 22148; THENCE ALONG SAID
NORTHEASTERLY LINE SOUTH 29°08'03. EAST A DISTANCE OF 7.33 FF-h'rI' TO THE
POINT OF BEGINNING.
SAID PARCEL CONTAINS 2,698.1 SQUARE FlufF:T, 0,062 ACRF.~ MORE OR LESS.
PARCI::-I. "F"
BEGINNING AT THE MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 169, BEING ALSO A
POINT ON TEE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT NUMBER 22148; THENCE
ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE, SOUTH 29°08'03" EAST A DISTANCE OF 7.17
FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE, -NORTH 73°19'41" WEST A
DISTANCE OF 24.58 FEEt TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF A NONTANGENT
CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY WITH RADIUS OF 428.00 FEET, THE RADIAL
LINE TO SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 58°35'01" EAST; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY
ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 13°54'10" AN ARC
DISTANCE OF 103.85 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT
Fd~ No. wpSl'~ot'!67-9.,lgl
NUMBER 22148, THE RADIAL LINE TO SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 44°40'51" EAST;
THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE SOUTH 66°09'32* EAST A DISTANCE OF
13.54 FEET TO THE MOST NORTHERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 169, SAID
NORTHERLY CORNER BEING ALSO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF A NONTANGENT
CURVE CONCAVE SO~TERLY WITH RADIUS OF 433.00 FEET, THE RADIAL
LINE TO SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 46°21'18" EAST; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY
ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 11°58'29* AN ARC
DISTANCE OF 90.50 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 73°19'41* EAST A DISTANCE OF 17.52
FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
SAID PARCEL CONTAINS 590.7 SQUARE FEET, 0.014 ACRES MORE OR LESS~
SUBJECT TO ALL COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND KESERVATIONS, RESTRICTIONS,
RIGHTS, RIGHTS OF WAY AND EASEMENTS, IF ANY, OF RECORD.
SEE EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO AND BY TI-IIS REFERENCE MADE A PART
HEREOF.
Gar~y~fpska RCE 30 0
Exp. 12/31/97
F~ Ne. wl~l~motl6'7-9.l~!
sc~t,, 1' - ~0' ~. ~
· 'l
~i ."
.,!.~..0.~=. i ~,i::'
Parcel
\ \
· ~I3*S4'S3'V ' 7.3;"
k24.90' k 17.58'
N29'O6'Se'V · · d29'O6'Se'V
19.97' X 18.00'
NPg*OB'O3'V
EXHIBIT
Sheet 1 of 2 Sheets
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE EASEMENT
Lot 167 ond portion of IotA' of
Tract 22148 r~c0rdsd June 2.2, 1969
o8 8hown by mop filed in Book 202,
Poge, 92--104 of mops, records of the
County Recorder, Riverside County. State
of Collfomla.
N12'38'09
7.61'
t 169~;'\
:,%- o. Parcel "C"
Parcel "~ ~ ,-r'~ ~
· ../ P.O.B.
@
N2g'OB'O3'W
~ 7.33'
N13'54'33'E '
24.63' P .O.:B.
' \ N13'54'3YE
~ 17.31'
LINE: BIP, ECTD3N DISTANCE:
LI N'/3*Ig'41'V 24,58'
L2 N66*Og'32'V 13.54'
L3 N73'19'41'V 17.52'
L4 N66°Og"3i?.'V 49,52'
L5 N29*OB'O3'V 67.95'
/Parcel "E"
168
Parcel "B"
CURVE LENGTH DELTA RADIUS
i~ I,%%. I' "='~'
,=,.,,,' I~:o%°:1
Sheet 2 of 2 Sheets \
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE EASEMENT
Lot 168, Lot 169 and portion of Lot 'A'
of Tract 22148 recorded June 22. 1989
e shown by map filed in Book 202,
Page 92-104. of Male. records of the
County Recorder, Riverde County, State
of California. .
N'~OB,28~W
24-88i
Recorded at request of and return to:
City Clerks Department
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
FREE RECORDING:
Parcol:Lots 8,9,36,37,38,A
This instrument is for the benefit of the City 2-7 & B Lots 67-73
of Temecula and is entitled to be recorded without fee Project:Tract #22916-0
(Govt. Code 8103).
IRREVOCABLE OFFER TO DEDICATE
FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged
Taylor Woodrow Homes Califomia Limited ("Grantor'), hereby irrevocably offers
to dedicate to the City of Temecula ("Grantee"), together with the right to further
grant or transfer the same to others, a perpetual easement and right-of-way for
maintaining, operating, altering, repairing, and replacing equipment and
landscaping over and within the boundaries of that certain real property located
in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, more particularly described in
Exhibit "A" attached hereto, which is incorporated herein by this reference (the
"Easement Area").
If GRANTEE, or its governmental entity, successors, or assigns, determines it is
unable, incapable, or unwilling to maintain said Easement Area, maintenance
shall, after notice, become the responsibility of GRANTOR, with all covenants
and agreements of this easement extending to and becoming obligations of all
heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the GRANTOR.
GRANTOR
lw~LV 9. 1995
DATED
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
On ~ {:J , I ~'before me, the undersigned, A Notary Public in and for the
State of~alifornia, personally appeared }EFF~.-'r. J. P~-c~'~c~personally known
to me (or proved to mo en tho bar.,ie of eatiofac, tr~ry ¢victonc¢),to be the person(~)
whose names(,~) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to
me that he/sho/the~ executed the same in his/hor/thoir authorized capacity(-ies,),
and that by his/hc, r/thsif signature(s) on the instrument the person(e-), or the
entity upon behalf of which the person(-s.) acted, executed the instrument.
' ,~ No~a.'~ publk: - c,--ditornia
ERTIF!CATE OF ACCEPTA!~IE::~ '
This is to certify that the interest in real property conveyed by the within
irrevocable Offer to Dedicate to the City of Temecula, a political corporation
and/or governmental agency, is hereby accepted by order of the City Council the
data below and the Grantee consents to the recordation thereof by its duly
authorized officer.
DATE
June S. Greek, City Clerk
ROBERT BEIN, WILLIAM FROST AND ASSOCIATES
28765 Single Oak Drive, Suite 250
Temecula, California 92590
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Revised January 17, 1995
October 22, 1990
JN 24871-R10
Page1 of 3
CSD - LANDSCAPE RAINTENANCE EASERENT
TRACT NO. 22916
PARCEL I
That certain parcel of land situated in the City of Temecula, County of
Riverside, State of California, being those portions of Lots 8, 9, 36, 37, 38 and
"A" of Tract No. 22916 as shown on a map thereof filed in Book 225, Pages 65
through 72 of Naps in the Office of the County Recorder of said Riverside County,
described as follows:
BEGINNING at a point in that certain course in the southwesterly line of said Lot
8 shown as "North 18'53'00" West 171.08 feet" distant thereon
North 18'53'00" West 84.00 feet from the southeasterly terminus thereof;
thence South 71'07'00" West 6.00 feet to a line parallel and/or concentric with
and 6.00 feet southwesterly from the northeasterly line of said Lot "A';
thence along said parallel and/or concentric line through the following courses:
North 18'53'00" West 327.47 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave
easterly and having a radius of 1456.00 feet;
thence along said curve northerly 185.39 feet through a central angle of
7'17'43";
thence leaving said parallel and/or concentric line, radially from said curve
North 78'24'43" East 32.56 feet to a point on a non-tangent curve concave
easterly and having a radius of 1600.00 feet, a radial line of said curve from
said point bears North 74'10'26" East;
thence along said curve southerly 201.24 feet through a central angle of 7'12'23"
to a point on the northwesterly line of said Lot 9 distant thereon
North 71'07'00" East 40.00 feet from the most westerly corner thereof;
thence South 32'27'25" West 32.02 feet;
thence South 21'27'34" East 200.25 feet to the southeasterly line of said Lot 9;
thence South 19'13'06" East 87.08 feet to a line bearing North 71'07'00" East
from the POINT OF BEGINNING;
thence South 71'07'00" West 24.51 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING: 0.38 Acres, more or less.
Robert Bein, William Frost
and Associates
CSO-Landscape Maintenance Easement
Tract No. 22916
Revised January 17, 1995
October 22, 1990
JN 24871-M10
Page 2 of 3
PARCEL 2-
That certain parcel of land situated in the City of Temecula, County of
Riverside, State of California, being those portions of Lots 2 through 7 and:'B"
of Tract No. 22916 as shown on a map thereof filed in Book 225, Pages 65 through
72 of Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of said Riverside County,
described as follows:
BEGINNING at the southeasterly corner of said Lot 2;
thence along the southerly prolongation of the easterly line of said lot
South 8'15'30' East 6.00. feet to a line parallel and/or concentric with and 6.00
feet southerly from the northerly line of said Lot 'B";
thence along said parallel and/or concentric line through the following courses:
South 81'44'30" West 270.00 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave
southerly and having a radius of 1238.00 feet;
thence along said curve westerly 54.40 feet through a central angle of 2'31'04";
thence leaving said parallel and/or concentric line, radially from said curve
North 10'46'34' West 27.82 feet to a point on a non-tangent curve concave
southerly and having a radius of 1300.00 feet, a radial line of said curve from
said point bears South g'53'40" East;
thence along said curve easterly 54.47 feet through a central angle of 2'24'02';
thence tangent from said curve North 82'30'22" East 151.16 feet to the easterly
line of said Lot 4;
thence North 83'39'01" East 120.07 feet to said easterly line of Lot 2;
thence along said easterly line South 8'15'30" East 15.00 feet to the POINT OF
BEGINNING.
CONTAINING: 0.19 Acres, more or less.
PARCEL 3
That certain parcel of land situated in the City of Temecula, County of
Riverside, State of California, being those portions of Lots 67 through 73 and
"B" of Tract No. 22916 as shown on a map thereof filed in Book 225, Pages 65
through 72 of Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of said Riverside County,
described as follows:
.BEGINNING at the southwesterly corner of said Lot 73;
Robert Bein, William Frost
and Associates
CSD-Landscape Maintenance Easement
Tract No. 22916
Revised January 17, 1995
October 22, 1990
JN 24871-M10
Page 3 of 3
thence along the westerly line of said lot North 8'15'30" West 9.40 feet;
thence North 82'34'16" East 62.01 feet to the easterly line of said Lot 73;
thence North 83'21'30" East 124.05 feet to the easterly line of said Lot 71;
thence North 67'5Z'58' East 12.52 feet to a point on a non-tangent curve concave
northerly, having a radius of 1148.00 feet and being concentric with and 8.00
feet northerly from a curve in the northerly line of said Lot 'B" having a radius
of 1156.00 feet, a radial line of said curve from said point bears'
North 8'15'30' West;
thence along said concentric curve easterly 322.98 feet through a central angle
of 16'07'11" to the easterly line of said Lot 67;
thence radially from said curve, along said easterly line and the southerly
prolongation thereof South 24'22'41' East 14.00 feet to a point on a non-tangent
curve concave northerly, having a radius of 1162.00 feet and being concentric
with and 6.00 feet southerly from said curve in the northerly line of Lot "B';
thence along said concentric curve westerly 326.92 feet through a central angle
of 16'07'11';
thence tangent from said curve South 81'44'30" West 198.16 feet to the southerly
prolongation of said westerly line of Lot 73;
thence along said southerly prolongation North 8'15'30" West 6.00 feet to the
POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING: 0.17 Acres, more or less.
SUBJECT TO all Covenants, Rights, Rights-of-Way and-Easements of Record.
EXHIBIT "B" attached and by this reference made a part hereof.
Lawrence L. Bacon, L.S. 3527
4~
5~
58
\k
SHEET I OP I SHEET
R£ ws,, D
H
.8
7
.PARCEl
~V4 y
~Reco~ded at request of and return to:
City Clerks Department
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
FREE RECORDING
This instrument is for the benefit of
the City of Temecula and is entitled
to be recorded without fee
(Govt. Code 6103).
IRREVOCABLE OFFER TO DEDICATE
Parcel: Tract ~22916-,
Lots 3,4,and "A"
Project: Vintage Hills
FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged,
· r~ye~, ~ ~llfnrnln f'-pn~r~l P~rrner~hip
('Grantor'), hereby irrevocably offers to dedicate to the City of Temecula ("Grantee'), together
with the right to further grant or transfer the same to others, a perpetual easement and right-of-way for
maintaining, operating, altering, repairing, and replacing equipment and landscaping over and within the boundaries
of that certain real property located in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, more particularly described in
Exhibit "A" attached hereto, which is incorporated herein by this reference .(the "Easement Area").
If GRANTEE, or its governmental entity, successors, or assigns, determines it is unable, incapable, or unwilling to
maintain said Easement Area, maintenance shall, after notice, become the responsibility of GRANTOR, with all.'
covenants and agreements of this easement extending to and becoming obligations of all heirs, executors,
administrators, successors and assigns of
(OFFICIN, NOTARY SEAL
LAURAL OHARA
NeaP/Pulic--i
ORNIGECOtNW
· 'personaJ]y k~own to m~, or ~ proved (o m~ on th~ basis of ~dsfaGo~ ~)
~¢ace to b~ the p~soa(s) whose a;¢(s) i~ subsGi~d to ~¢ withia :{
ias(mm~m a~d a~nowlCdScd to m~ tha~;¢~x~cmCd ~h~ ~m¢ in ~
~her/their auffiorized Gpadty(ies), and that by~er/ffieir signa- -'
ture(s) on the ins~ment the ~rson(s), or the entity upon ~half of ~
which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
:, WCere. ames nJ~oLne5 WR"NESS my hand and/~ffici s¢ 1. "
': Notary Seal: ignature
s;,l s:s tu x;~tuey uslt tHt~ itettlte~it itl teal prope~ conveyeo Oy ~e w~l~ i~evocaDle uner io ueolca;e to
Temecula, a polhical coloration and/or governmental agency, is hereby accepted by order of the CiW Council ~e date below
and ~e Gmnxe consen~ to ~e recoffi~on ~ereof by ~ duly a~hodzed officer.
Date
June S. Greek, City Clerk
3e/feemebeev.ded 013112
ROBERT BEIN, WILLIAR FROST AND ASSOCIATES
28765 Single Oak Drive, Suite Z50
Temecula, California 92390
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
CSD - LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE EASEMENT
TRACT NO. 22916-2
October 22, 1990
JN 24871-M7
Page 1of i
That certain parcel of land situated in the City of Temecula, County of
Riverside, State of California, being those portions of .Lots 3, 4 and "A" of
Tract No. 22916-2 as shown on a map thereof filed in Book 225, Pages 51 through
56 of Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of said Riverside County,
described as follows:
BEGINNING at the most westerly corner of said Lot 4;
thence along the northwesterly line of said lot North 78'00'00" East 42'.50 feet;
thence South 40'58'15" West 49.93 feet;
thence South 13'47'46" East 340.12 feet;
thence South 81'20'00" West 38.68 feet to a line parallel and/or concentric with
and 6.00 feet southwesterly from the northeasterly line of said Lot "A";
thence along said parallel and/or concentric line through the following courses:
North 8'40'00" West 295.95 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave
westerly and having a radius of 1244.00 feet;
thence along said curve northerly 72.37 feet through a central angle of 3'20'00"
to the northwesterly line of said Lot A;
thence leaving said parallel and/or concentric line, along said northwesterly
line, radially from said curve North 78'00'00"' East 6.00 feet to the POINT OF
BEGINNING.
CONTAINING: 0.20 Acres, more or less.
SUBJECT TO all Covenants, Rights, Rights-of-Way and Easements of Record.
EXHIBIT 'B' attached and by this reference made a part hereof.
~c,O ~.AND S~,,
:. Lawrence L. Bacon,
,L.S. 3527
E .
~OF
IITRACT NO. 2291E_~3
M.B. 225 / 57-E4
Z4
Z7
~IEET I of,r
,-~£ET
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS, Pt. ANNEI~ & SURVEYORS
(7~4) f/14042 · FAX f~4) e/I-l'Ne
OCT:. 2~2, !fro ,ZN. 24e7~
EXEMFr RECORDING REQUESTED BY
City of Temccula
PER OOV'T CODE § 6103
AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
Office of the City Clerk
City of Tcmecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
MArt- TAX STATENIENTS TO:
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE
GRANT
The undersigned grantor declares:
FOR A VALUABI-~ CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged,
JLD Properties, A California General Partnership
hereby grants to the CITY OF TEMECULA, a body corporate and politic, the following
described real property in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of C~llfomia:
See Exhibit "A" attached hereto.
Executed on May 8
,1995 at
California.
Lake Forest
3e/feme/grendeed 013192
ACKNOWr ,r~DGMENT
STATE OF CAL,WORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
On Hay 8, 1995 before me, the undersigned, A Notary Public in and for the State
of California, personally appeared Gary R. Dix . personally known to me
(or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s)
is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed
the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the
instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the
J ......
MyCOk,'l~. '1001681
WITNESS my hand and official seal. i
Note~/~ -- C,,oifomio
CONSENT
The City of Temecula hereby consents to the grant of real property set forth above.
ATTEST:
By~
June S. Greek, City Clerk
City of Temecula
By:
Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By:
Peter Thorson, City Attorney
3e/fefms/gwvM:le~d
013192
EXHIBIT.'A'
LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS
Those portions of Tract 25004-1 per Map Book 241 pages 29-3S, records of Riverside County,
California, described as follows:
LOT 57
Lot 57 of said Tract 73004-1.
PARCEL *A* ,
BEGINNING at the westerly most point of Lot 57 of said Tract 25004-1; thence South
89o43'2.?' West 18.60 feet; thence North 10016'54" East 10.03 feet to the beginning of a
tangent curve concave to the southeast having a radius of 25.00 feet; thence along said
curve through a central angle of 90'00'00" a distance of 39.27 feet; thence South 79043'
06' East 35.88 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve cOncave to the north and having
a radius of 312.00 feet; thence along said curve through a central angle of 10033'29" a'
distance of 57.49 feet; thence Noah 89043'29" East 264.75 feet to the cusp of a non-
tangent curve concave to the northwest having a radius of 70.00 feet, a radial through said
point bears North 53°24'23" West; thence along said curve through a central angle of
22007'38" a distance of 27.03 feet; thence South 89043'25" West 244.81 feet to the
beginning of a tangent curve concave to the north having a radius of 330.00 feet; thence
along said curve through a central angle of 10033~9" a distance of 60.81 feet; thence
North 79043'06" West 29.88 feet; thence South 53°18'24" West 18.63 feet to the POINT
OF BEGINNING.
PARCEL "B"
BEGINNING at the southeasterly most comer of said Tract 25004-1; thenee South
89043'25" West 272.54 feet to the beginning of a non-tangent curve concave to the west
having a radius of 1490.00 feet; thence along said curve through a central angle of
02°48'21" a distance of 72.97 feet; thence North 02°42'13" East 1196.93 feet; thence South
89°57'17" East 211.17 feet; thence South 00002'43, West 401.51 feet; thence South
00°00'00" West 865.37 feet to the .POINT OF BEGINNING.
PARCEL "C"
BEGINNING at the Southwest comer of Lot 33 of said Tract 25004-1; thence North
89°43'25" East 120.00 feet; thence North 03°18'16" East 123.98 feet; thence North
00°55'54" West 253.43 feet; thence North 04°11'34" East 129.02 feet; thence North
01°59'21" East 261.37 feet; thence North 03°18'16" East 469.24 feet; thence NOrth
13°48'52" East 96.60 feet; thence South 87o17'47" East 20.00 feet; thence South 02°42'13"
West 1289.93 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave to the west having a radius
of 1490.00 feet; thence along said curve through a central angle of 02°48'21" a distance
of 72.97 feet; thence South 89043'25" West 173.92 feet to the cusp of a non-tangent curve
concave to the west having a radius of 70.00 feet, a radial line through said point bean
North 31°16'45" West; thence along said curve through a central angle of 36°18'33" a
distance of 44.36 feet .to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
5/ .
ANDREWS WAY ,S rJ
LOT D
_7500d-1
,,x. -.
CURVE D~L TA RADIUS tEN&'TH
CI 10'33'29" 330.00" 60.81'
C2 90 '00 '00" 25.00 ' 39.
03 10 '33 '29' 312.00 ' 57. 49 '
C4 14'I0"55' 70.00' I7.33"
C5 22'07'3B" 70.00' 27.03'
C6 36'18'33' 70.00' 44.36'
C7 02 '48 '21 "' 1490. O0 ' 72.97'
LINE BEARING D/STANCE
LI NS3'IB'24'E 18.63'
L2 NTg'43'O6'W 29,88'
t 3 N89' 43 '25 "E ! 04.83 '
L4 N89'dJ'26'E 18.60'
L5 N10 ' 16 '54 *E lO. 03 '
L6 NRg '43 '25 "E 264.75'
L 7 N89 ' 43 '25 *E 24 4, 81 '
L B NB9 '43 '25 *E 12O. O0 ·
L9 NOJ'tB'I6'E 123.98'
L lO NO0 '56 '54 'W 253.43 '
tl? N04'll '34"E 129.02'
L 72 NO! '59 '21 'E 26?, JT'
LI3 N79'43'O6'W 35,8B'
THE CITY OF TEMECULA HEREBY TAKES
POSSESSION OF THE OPEN SPACE LOT 57
AND PARCELS A, B AND C RETROACll.~'
TO THE VESTED TENTATIVE MAP APPROVAL
DATE OF OCTOBER 13, 1990.
44
42
41
4O
3~
37
N8777'47'W 20.00'
NBg :57'? 7'W
2H.
PARCEL
1.288 AC
PARCEL
7.009 AC
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICr
· · BIIIlIBtlIQ AIBO~JATE8
MOil P.O. BOx 6087 · 92412
F~e (909)B~4--M04 FAX (~)~-6143
t A
=, ,- --, .,-. ~..---.-,,-,.LANDSCAPE DEDICA T/ON PLA r
PARCEL "A "
0.161 AC 3
~'~"~ pZ'~~~~ ~L ',
' ~' ' 3~8 272. 54'
ITEM 3
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
Community Services Board of Directors
FROM:
Ronald E. Bradley, General Manager
DATE:
May 23, 1995
SUBJECT:
PREPARED BY:
Award Professional Services Contract for Materials Testing During the
Construction of Rancho California Sports Park Improvement
Project No. PW94-O7CSD
Edward Stone, Assistant Engineer - Capital Projects
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Board of Directors:
Award a Professional Services Contract to Geotechnical and Environmental Engineers,
Inc. (GEE) to provide material testing services during the construction of Rancho
California Sports Park Improvement Project No. PW94-07CSD, in an amount not to
exceed $18,634·
Appropriate $18,634 for the services contract and $1,864 for 10% contingency for
a total of $20,498 from Development Impact Fees to the Capital Project Fund.
BACKGROUND:
On April 25, 1995 the Board of Directors awarded the construction contract for Rancho
California Sports Park Improvement Project No. PW94-O7CSD to E.A. Mendoza Contracting.
It is anticipated that construction will begin during the month of June, 1995.
As noted in the approved specifications, the City is responsible for providing material testing
services. The scope of services to be provided for this project include, but are not limited to
the observation of rough grading, masonry construction, and foundation preparation. GEE will
also provide testing of concrete and masonry units, reinforcing steel, parking area sub-grade,
and soil compaction.
GEE was selected from the City's qualified consultant list for professional services.
Consultants are selected on a rotating basis for each project. A project specific scope of
services is developed with a fee not to exceed the negotiated contract amount.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The construction project is being funded by Development Impact Fees and community
donations. The materials testing service contract is in the amount of ~18,634 plus the 10%
contingency of ~ 1,864. An additional ~20,498 needs to be transferred from the Development
Impact Fee fund to the Capital Projects fund appropriated to Account No. 210-190-137-5804.
ATTACHMENTS:
Professional Services Contract
-2- c~,d~WS~O~23~w~..07 Jwd:ajp
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
This Agreement was made and entered into this 23rd day of May, 1995, by and
between the City of Temecula ("City"), a municipal corporation, and Geotechrdcal &
Environmental Engineers, Inc., a California Corporation ("Consultant").
The parties her·to mutually agree as follows:
elI ·
Services. Consultant shall perform the tasks set forth in Exhibit "A" attached
her·to. Consultant shall complete the tasks according to the schedule set forth in
Exhibit "A".
Performance. Consultant shall at all times, faithfully, industrially and to the best of
his ability, experience and talent, perform all tasks described her·in.
m
Payment. The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, at the hourly rates set forth
in Exhibit "B" attached her·to, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks.
This amount will not exceed $18,634.00for the total term of the Agreement unless
additional payment is approved by the City Council; provided that the City Manager
may approve additional payment not to exceed ten percent (10%) of the
Agreement; but in no event more than $10,000.
Consultant will submit invoices monthly for actual services performed. Invoices
shall be submitted on or about the first business day of each month, for services
provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of
receipt of each invoice.
Amendments. This Agreement may be amended so long as such amendment is in
writing and agreed upon by both the City Council and Consultant.
Ownership of Documents. Upon satisfactory completion of or in the e~/ent of
termination, suspension or abandonment of this Agreement, all original documents,
designs, dr.awings, and notes prepared in the course of providing the services to be
performed pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of the City
and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by the City without the
permission of the Consultant.
Termination. The City may terminate this Agreement without cause so long as
written notice of intent to terminate is given to Consultant at least three (3) days
prior to the termination date. In the event of termination, Consultant shall be paid
for the services performed.
Indemnification. The Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify, protect and save
harmless the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against
any and all claims, demands, losses, defense cost, or liability of any kind or nature
which the City, its officers, agents and employees may sustain or incur or which
may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property
arising out of Consultant's acts or omissions under the terms of this Agreement,
excepting only liability arising out of the sole negligence of the City.
- 1 - r:%cip~orojects~owg4-O7~,geotech.agrlajp
e
10.
11.
Status of Consultant. Consultant is an independent contractor in all respects in the
performance of this Agreement and shall not be considered an employee of the City
for any purpose. No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in
connection with the performance of this Agreement.
Except as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other
compensation to Consultant for performing services her. under for City. City shall
not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Consultant for injury or sickness
arising out of performing services her.under.
Tqrm. This Agreement shall commence on May 23, 1995, and shall remain and
continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later
than May 23, 1996.
Default. In the event that Consultant is in default for cause under the terms of this*
Agreement, the City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating
Consultant for any work performed after the date of default. Default shall include
not performing the tasks described her. in to the reasonable satisfaction of the City
Manager of the City. Failure by the Consultant to make progress in the performance
of work hereunder, if such failure arises out of causes beyond his control, and
without fault or negligence of the Consultant, shall not be considered a default.
Any disputes regarding performance, default or other matters in dispute between
the City and the Consultant arising out of this Agreement or breech thereof, shall
be resolved by arbitration. The arbitrator's decision shall be final.
Consultant shall select an arbitrator from a list provided by the City of three retired
judges of the Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services, Inc. The arbitration
hearing shall be conducted according to California Code of Civil Procedure Section
1280, et seo. City and Consultant shall share the cost of the arbitration equally.
Notices. Notices shall be given pursuant to this Agreement by personal service on
the party to be notified, or by written notice upon such party deposited in the
custody of the United States Postal Service addressed as follows:
ee
City: City of Temecula
Attention: Ronald E. Bradley, City Manager
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
Consultant: Geotechnical & Environmental Engineers, Inc.
Attention: Jim Harrison
27447 Enterprise Circle, West
Temecula, CA 92590
The notices shall be deemed to have been given as of the date of personal service,
or three (3) days after the date of deposit of the same in the custody of the United
States Postal Service.
- 2 - r:%cip%p rojects~p w94-07\geotech.egrlajp
12.
13.
14.
15.
Entire Aoreement. This Agreement and any documents or instrument attached
hereto or referred to herein integrate all terms and conditions mentioned herein or
incidental hereto supersede all negotiations and prior writing in respect to the
subject matter hereof.
In the event of conflict between the terms, conditions, or provisions of this
Agreement and any such document or instrument, the terms and conditions of this
Agreement shall prevail.
Leaal Resoonsibilities. The Consultant shall keep itself informed of State and
Federal laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it 'or in
any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The
Consultant shall at all times observe and comply with all such laws and regulations.
The City, and its officers and employees, shall .not be liable at law or in equity
occasioned by failure of the Consultant to comply with this section.
Assianment. The Consultant shall not assign the performance of this Agreement,
nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without the prior written
consent of the City.
Upon termination of this Agreement, Consultant's sole compensation shall be the
value to the City of the services rendered.
LiabiliW Insurance. The Consultant shall maintain insurance acceptable to the City
in full force and effect throughout the term of this contract, against claims for
injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection
with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, his agents,
representatives, employees or subcontractors. Insurance is to be placed with
insurer with a Beets' rating of no less than A:VII. The costs of such insurance shall
be included in the Contractor's bid. The Consultant shall provide the following
scope and limits of insurance:
Minimum Scooe of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
Insurance Services OTfice Form No. GL-0002 (Ed. 1/73) covering
Comprehensive General Liability and Insurance Services Office Form No.
GL-0404 covering Board Form Comprehensive General Liability; or
Insurance Services office Commercial General Liability coverage
("occurrence" Form No. CG-0001 ).
Insurance Services Office Form No. CA-0001 (Ed. 1/78) coverir~g
Automobile Liability, Code I "any auto" and Endorsement CA-0025.
Workers' Compensation insurance as required by Labor Code of the
State of California and Employers' Liability insurance.
4. Errors and Omissions insurance.
Minimum Limits of Insurance. Contractor shall maintain limits of insurance no
less than:
-3- r:~cip%projects%pwg4-07~geotech.agrlajp
General Liability: $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for
bodily injury and property damage.
Automobile Liability: $1,000,000combined single limit per accident for
bodily injury and property damage.
Workers' Compensation and Employers' Liability: Workers'
Compensation as required by the Labor Code of the State of California
and Employers' Liability limits of $1,000,000 per accident.
4. Errors and Omissions Insurance: $1,000,000 per occurrence.
Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductible in excess of $1,000
must be declared to and approved by the City.
Other Insurance Provisions. Insurance policies required by this contract shall
contain or be endorsed to contain the following provisions:
All Policies. Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be
endorsed to state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided,
concealed by either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after
thirty (30) days prior written notice to the City via United States First
Class Mall.
General Liability and Automobile Liability Coveraaes. The City, its
officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as
insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on
behalf of the Consultant; products and completed operations of the
Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used by the Consultant, or
automobiles owned, lease, hired or borrowed by the Consultant. The
coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection
afforded to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers.
With regard to claims arising from the Consultant's performance of the
work described in this contract, the Consultant's insurance coverage
shall be primary insurance as respects the City its officers, officials,
employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained
by the City, its officers, officials, employees or employees or volunteers
shall apply in excess of, and not contribute with, the Consultant's
insurance. :
Any failure to comply with the reporting provisions of the policies shall
not affect coverage provided to the City, its officers officials, employees
or volunteers.
The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against
whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits
of the insurer's liability.
-4- r:%cip%projecte%pw94-O7\geotech.agrlajp
Workers' Comoensation and Emolovers' Liability Coveraoe. The insurer
shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against the City, its
officers, officials, employees and volunteers for losses arising from work
performed by the Consultant for the City.
Verification of Coveraae. Contractor shall furnish the City with
certificates of insurance affecting coverage required by this clause. The
certificates for each insurance policy are to be signed by a person
authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on. its behalf. The
certificates are to be on forms provided by the City and are to be
received and approved by the City before work commences. The City
reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required
insurance policies, at any time.
Consultant shall include all subconsultants as insureds under its policieS.
or shall furnish separate certificates for each subcontractor. All
coverages for subcontractors shall be subject to all of the requirements
stated herein.
Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and
approved by the City. At the option of the City, either: the insurer shall
reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as
respects the City, its officers, officials and employees; or the Consultant
shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related
investigations, claim administration and defense expenses.
16.
Licenses. Consultant and subconsultant shall obtain all necessary licenses,
including but not limited to, City Business Licenses.
The parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date and year above
written.
CONSULTANT
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Jim Harrison
By
Ron Roberts, President
Geotechnical & Environmental Engineers,
Inc.
-5- r:%cip%projects%pw94-O7~.geotech.agrlajp
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
-6- r:~cip~orojects~ow94-OT~geotech.egrlajp
EXHIBIT "A"
TASKS TO BE PERFORMED
r:~cip~projects%pw94-O7%geotech.agr/ajp
Mr. Dennis Armstrong
City of Temecula
May 4, 1995
Page 2
Based on this information, we propose the following scope of services for rough grading
control and utility trench back~ll testing, concrete inspection and materials testing:
SCOPE OF SERVICES
ROUGH GRADING CONTROL
Observation and Testing - Rough Grading (Full Time)
· Senior Technician (120 hrs @ $50/hr) .......................... $6,000.00'
· Field Supervisor (10 hrs @ $60/hr) ................ : ............ $600.00
· Engineering Geologic Inspection (4 hrs @ $80/kr) ................. $320.00
· Clerical (12 hrs @ $35/hr) ................................... $420.00
· Travel and Vehicle ...................................... No Charge
Trench Baclr~ll Testing (Part Time - On Call)
· Senior Technician (50 hn @ $50/hr) .......................... $2,500.00
Parking Area Subgrade and Base Testing
· Senior Technician (6 hn @ $50/hr) ............................ $300.00
Footing Inspection
· Staff Geologist (2 hrs @ $55/hr) ............................... $110.00
Casting Concrete Cylinders and Grout Prisms
· Deputy Inspector (42 hours @ $55/hr) ......................... $2,310.90
Laboratory Testing
· Maximum Density (4 tests @ $100 each) ........................ $400.00
· Compressire Strength Te-~ting
· Concrete Cylinder 6X12 (188 @ $18) ..................... $3,384.00
· Grout Prism-~ (12) cutting not included ..................... $240.00
· Rebar Testing, Bend and Tensile (4 @$50 each) .................. $200.00
Final Compaction Report Preparation ...................... Lump Sum $1,850.00
Total $18,634 O0 ~
EXHIBIT "B"
PAYMENT SCHEDULE
r:~eip%projects~pwg4-O7%geotech.egrlajp
Geotechnical & Environmental Engineers,
ENVIRONMENTAL FEE SCHEDULE
EFFECTIVE JANUARY, 1993
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
Principal Engineer I Geologist I Hydrogeologist ........................................ $100.00 Per Hour
Associate Engineer I Geologist I Hydrogeologist ....................................... $92.00 Per Hour
Senior Engineer I Geologist I Hydrogeologist ........................................... $85.00 Per Hour
Senior Ent4ronmental A~sessor ..................................................... $83.00 Per Hour
Project Engineer I Geologist I Hydrogeologist .......................................... $70.00 Per Hour
Project Environmental As3e=sor ..................................... : ............... $64.00 Per Hour
Staff Engineer I Geologist I Hydrogeologist ............................................ $60.00 Per Hour
Start En~ronmental Aue~sor ....................................................... $55.00 Per Hour
Field Director .................................................................. $50.00 Per Hour
Senior Technician ............................................................... $48.00 Per Hour
Technician II ................................................................... $45.00 Per Hour
Technician I ................................................................... $40.00 Per Hour
Draftsperson ................................................................... $38.00 Per Hour
Cletfcal ....................................................................... $38.00 Per Hour
Pick-up and Delivery ............................................................. $24.00 Per Hour
SPECIAL EQUIPMENT
On-Site Vehicle Charges ........................................................... 64.00 Per Hour
Field Groundwater Sampling Equipment ............................................... By arrangement
Organic Vapor Meter ............................................................. $100.00 Per Day
interlace Probe .................................................................. $60.e0 Per Day
Other Environmental Equipment ..................................................... By arrangement
Gadphysical Equipment ........................................................... By ~'rangement
TERMS OF PAYMENT
Invoices rendered for professional setv/ces arei due upon presentation. A service charge of 1.5 percent per month may be charged
on accounts not paid within 30 days to cover additional processing and carrying costs. Any attomey's fees or other costs incurred
in collecting any delinquent account will be paid by the client.
An overtime charge of 33.3% of hourly rates will be added for time in exce~s of 8 hours per day (excluding travel) and time before
7:00 a.m. and alter 5 p.m. or on Saturdays. An overtime charge of 50% will be charged for time in excess of 12 hours per day and
on Sundays or legal holidays. Charges for travel ]o or from project are free up to a maximum of 112 hour each way. All travel time
in excess of 112 hour each way will be charged at straight time.
27431 Enterprise Circle West · Ternecula CA 92590 · TEL (909~ 676-8337 FAX (9C--91 676-4583
ITEM 4
APPROVAL RY~
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFIC R
CITY MANAGE
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
General Manager/Board of Directors
Mary Jane McLarney, Assistant City Manager
May 23, 1995
Consideration of Fee Reduction for Filming at the Community Recreation Center
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council consider a fee reduction for filming at the Community Recreation Center
for Weekend in the Country, Inc.
BACKGROUND:
The Production Company, A Weekend in the Country Inc., arrived in Temecula on May 1,
1995 for the filming of their movie. They will be filming · portion of their movie at the
Community Recreation Center on May 30 - June 2.
According to the City'.s existing Resolution, the standard Facility Use Permit charges for "for
profit" organizations would total $6,500. In consideration of the economic benefit to
Temecula (see attached report), staff is recommending that the City Council reduce the fees
to $1,000. The City will be receiving $2,100 in Transient Occupancy Tax, as well as the
sales tax on the purchase of materials and supplies in the City of Temecula. To date,
$427,025 has been spent in the Temecula area. It should also be noted that filming will be
done during off hours between 7:00 p.m. to 5:00 e.m.
In connection with the User Fee Study currently underway, we have requested the consultant
to provide a separate fee schedule for filming at public facility for future Council consideration.
Economi~ Impact
Page 2
12. City, County & C-ovemment Pesmits
13. Personnel Costs (Police,Fire, P~c~ etc.)
14. LocalExtrasHired
Number of People - 500
15. Local Drivers Hired:
16. Local Security Hifed
17. Daily per diem
Number of Crew Paid - 70
18.
Number of Days- various
~D
~D
$30,0~
$13,162
· $ 9, 060
$ 78, 773
Other local hires: $ 87,750
(Carpenters, painters, .helicopter pilots, house cleaning service, craft service, etc.)
19. Production Services $14,165
20. Other rentals (furniture, tents, trash dumpsters, etc) $14,500
21. Other Purchases $ 24,115
- Tot~! Amount ,~p~nt.' ~ 497,09.5.00
(Actual figure will go higher)
Days on Location: 32 days
Pre-Producfion:
14 days, partial crew and 2 days, entire crew.
Hease note: Except for Pah Mesa Resort, which is in San Diego County, all monies
spent are in the City of Temecula and surrounding areas of Riverside County. -'
Economic Impact Report
(as of May 16, 1995)
Production Company: Weekend In the Country Inc,
Address: 2934 1/2 Beverly Glen Circle #318
Bel Air, CA 90077
Contact:
Phone:
Production Date:
Production Title:
Steven Hasson, Location Manager
Production Office at Pala Mesa Resort: (619) 731-1238
April 28, 1995 - June 2, 1995
'Weekend In the Country'
1. Hotel
Temecula Creek Inn
Pala Mesa Resort*
Embassy Suites/Best Western/Comfort Inn
Car Rental
LocalAirfare
Catering and other food items
Most/Produce bou~ army in Temamls by production cmerer
to feed 60-80 people (breakfast and lunch)
$ 25,000
$ 70,000'
$ 2,000
s 2,ooo
None
$ 35,000
Fruit/naeis/'t~-w=age and second meal food bought daily in Temecula
by production craft services to feed 60-80 people (on going food and beverage service for cast
and crew)
5. Hardware and lumber supplies $ 2,500
6. Flowers and Plants $ 4,500
7. Secretarial personnel, photocopying, etc. $ 11,500
8. Local Wardrobe purchased $ 5,000
9. Dry Cleaning/Laundry $ 5,000
10. Gasoline for 14 production vehicles and 25 crew cars $ 20,000
11. Location fees (Public and Private ) $ 43,000
DEPARTMENTAL
REPORT
CITY ATTOR~;~'ROV~
CITY OF TEMECULA
AOENDA REPORT
TO:
Board of Directors
FROM:
Ronald E. Bradley, General Manager
DATE: May 23, 1995
SUBJECT: Departmental Report
PREPARED BY: ~;;~Shawn D. Nelson, Director of. Community Services
The Parkview Site Project is divided into two (2) phases: the first phase is the construction
of the permanent fire station on Pauba Road west of Margarita Road, and the second phase
is the small retention pond adjacent to the CRC, east of the existing desiltation pond at the
Rancho California Sports Park. Staff anticipates bidding the first phase by mid-August, 1995
and the second phase prior to the end of this fiscal year.
The City Council awarded the design contract for the Margarita Park Master Plan to The
Alhambra Group on February 14, 1995. Staff has established a project committee comprised
of City Council members, Commissioners, interested members of the public, the Temecula
Valley Unified School District, sports organizations, and staff. The site is a 20 acre parcel on
Margarita Road west of Moraga and adjacent to the Temecula Elementary School. The first
project committee meeting was held on April 18, 1995. A second meeting with the Project
Committee has been scheduled for May 30, 1995 at Temecula Elementary School.
The plans for the sports field lighting project at Temecula Middle School have been submitted
by the designer to the Department of State Architect. The project will provide lighting for two
baseball diamonds, a soccer overlay, the track, and the football field. Staff anticipates the
project will be completed and ready for use by Pop Warner by September 1, 1995.
Pale Community Park construction is completed and is currently under a ninety (90) day
maintenance period. The park is tentatively scheduled to be open to the pubic in September,
1995. The park improvements include a restroom/snack bar, parking, tennis courts, basketball
courts, soccer field, landscaping, and irrigation.
The Rancho California Sports Park Improvement Project will begin construction in June, 1995.
Development of the 10 acre site will complete the improvements to the northeast corner of
the park at Rancho Vista and Margarita Roads. The improvements will include parking, picnic
facilities, a roller hockey rink, a skate board facility, restroom/concession building, landscaping
and irrigation system. It is anticipated that the project will be completed in April, 1996.
Plans for the Sam Hicks Monument Park Project have been submitted to the Economic
Development Agency to ensure compliance with CDBG requirements. Staff plans on bidding
the park project in May, 1995. Also, the Temecula Valley Museum has received approved
plans for the renovation to St Catherine's Church and has awarded a bid for construction. The
church renovation project should begin in June, 1995, and the park project should begin
construction in August, 1995.
The Planning Commission has also approved the plot plan for the new museum facility to be
constructed at Sam Hicks Monument Park. The Public Works Department will be working with
TCSD and the Museum to ensure coordination between construction efforts on this project.
REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY
ITEM 1
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
TUESDAY, MAY 9, 1995
A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency was called to order at
8:33 PM at the Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula,
California. Chairperson Ronald J. Parks presiding.
PRESENT: 5
AGENCY MEMBERS:
Lindemans, Muftoz, Roberts,
Stone, Parks
ABSENT: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None
Also present were Executive Director Ronald E. Bradley, General Counsel Peter Thorson
and City Clerk June S. Greek.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Bonnie Corbin, 28690 Mercedies St., Temecula, requested assistance from the Agency in
reaching Mr. Zev Buffman regarding property she owns in Old Town.
Agency Member Muf~oz gave her · number for Mr. Buffman end stated he would further
assist her if she has trouble getting through.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Agency Member Lindemans stated he would abstain on Item 1.2 since he was not present
at that meeting. It was moved by Agency Member Stone, seconded by Agency Member
Roberts to approve Consent Calendar No. 1, with Agency Member Lindemans abstaining
on Item 1.2.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 5
AGENCY MEMBERS:
Lindemans, Mur~oz, Roberts,
Stone, Parks
NOES:
0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None
I Minutes
1.1 Approve the minutes of April 11, 1995;
1.2
Approve the minutes of April 19, 1995, (Agency Member Lindemans
abstained;)
Minutee.rda%050995 -1 -
1.3 Approve the minutes of April 25, 1995.
AGENCY BUSINESS
2 Consideration of Soonsorshio for All Women's Rodeo
Assistant City Manager Mary Jane McLarney presented the staff report.
George Buhler, 40265 Paseo Sereno, spoke in opposition to the sponsorship.
Agency Member Stone stated he is not in favor of this funding based on the fact
this is a for-profit organization and it is not being held within the City limits.
It was moved by Agency Member Stone, seconded by Agency Member Lindemans
to deny the funding request. The motion was unanimously carried.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
None given.
AGENCY MEMBER'S REPORTS
Chairperson Parks stated he has received a request from the Cancer Society to allow a
street name to be raffled as a fund raiser and asked if staff has anything to report. City
Clerk June Greek reported that a verbal request has been received and Chief Building
Official Tony Elmo is working on a report. She clarified that no formal request has been
received.
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Agency Member Stone, seconded by Agency Member Roberts to adjourn
at 8:43 PM to a meeting on May 23, 1995, 8:00 PM, 30875 Rancho Vista Road,
Temecula, California. The motion was unanimously carried.
Ronald J. Parks, Chairperson
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk/Agency Secretary
Minutes.rds~050995 -2-
ITEM 2
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL ~~--
C.J,TY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICE
CITY MANAGER
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
AGENDA REPORT
Redevelopment Agency Members
Ronald E. Bradley, Executive Director
May 23, 1995
Temecula Shuttle Project
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Redevelopment Agency approve:
(1)
The execution of a lease of City-owned property at Front and Sixth Streets (APN #922-
023-020)to Ed and Kathleen Dool under terms and conditions described in Attachment
A in a form acceptable to the Executive Director and Agency Attorney;
(2)
An RDA Rehabilitation Loan of e 100,O00for the construction of the Temecula Shuttle
project under the terms described in Attachment B;
(3)
The appropriation of $97,423.76 for the purchase of property located at 41953 Main
Street, Temecula, California (APN #922-034-0291 )in accordance with Redevelopment
Agency action of December 20, 1994. (Attachment C).
STAFF REPORT:
On November 15, 1994, the Redevelopment Agency was asked to consider approval of an
RDA commercial rehabilitation loan to Ed and Kathleen Dool, d.b.a. Dual Development, Inc.
The application pertained to a site located at 41953 Main Street on which Dual Development
proposed to build their Temecula Shuttle project and supporting retail/office uses.
On November 15, the RDA directed that discussions be held between Redevelopment Agen~:y
staff, representatives of Dual Development, and T.Z.B.G., Inc. with respect to the
compatibility of the proposed Main Street Project with the planned Old Town
Entertainment Project. As a result of those discussions, the matter was returned to the
Redevelopment Agency on December 20, 1994 at which time the Redevelopment Agency
authorized transferring the Temecula Shuttle project to s City-owned site at Sixth and Front
Streets and the purchase of the Main Street site from Ed and Kathleen Dool. At that time, the
RDA approved ~93,651 from the RDA CIP Fund 280 for the purchase and related costs of the
Main Street site.
Agenda Report
Temecule Shuttle Project
Page 2
In accordance with the December 20, 1994 RDA action, Redevelopment Agency staff have
negotiated a lease of City-owned property for purposes of constructing the Temecula Shuttle
project. Lease terms were discussed in · Closed Session on April 25, 1995 at which time,
the Executive Director was authorized to negotiate a lease with the terms described in
Attachment B.
The property to be leased is currently owned by the City but is proposed to be transferred to
the RDA prior to execution of a lease with Temecula Shuttle, The City's General Fund will be
reimbursed by the RDA for all costs incurred as a result of the purchase of the site, The
purchase and reimbursement will require a separate action of the RDA and City Council which.'
will be docketed following RDA action on this matter,
An appropriation of $97,423.76is necessary to fund the purchase of the Main Street property
under terms previously approved. This amount represents a $3,762.80 increase in the
originally agreed upon purchase price due to the time which has elapsed between the initial
approval and reaching agreement on lease terms. During this period, Ed and Kathleen Dool
have incurred expenses for the property which under the terms of the purchase agreement
with the RDA must be reimbursed.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Funds are available in the RDA Smell Business Loan Account sufficient to fund the commercial
rehabilitation loan for Dual Development, Inc. in the amount of $100,000. The purchase was
approved on December 20, 1994 in the amount of ~93,661 representing the actual
documented purchase price and closing costs of the 41953 Main Street property of
$85,660.96 and other costs associated with the purchase not to exceed $8,000. An
appropriation in the amount of ~97,423.76 is required to fund this project.
Attachments
A - Proposed Lease Terms
B - Terms and Conditions for Temecula Shuttle Small Business Loan
C - Estimated Settlement Statement for Ed Dool
ATTACHMENT A
PROPOSED LEASE TERMS
SIXTH/FRONT CITY-OWNED SITE
APN #922-023-020
April 25, 1995
Development Proposal:
Recommended
Lease Term:
Recommended
Lease Rate:
Recommended
Lease Terms:
Additional Lease
Requirements:
Temecula Shuttle proposes to build up to 3,600 square feet of
space on approximately 12,000 square feet of property with
Front Street frontage. The development will include: Temecula
Shuttle offices/lobby/ticket windows, day lockers, picnic/snack-
area, tour coach/wine tour operations loading/discharge area and
rental office space.
The first 1,800 square feet of the project will require a minimum
of 14 parking spaces which would be developed on the leased
site. Additional required parking spaces, will be supplied by
means of a contribution by Temecula Shuttle to the City parking
district in the amount of the actual cost of City land and
construction per space.
Thirty year initial term; 3 five year options.
10% of market value ($10.50 per sq. ft.), escalated by 8% every
five years. Revised by appraisal to new market value at year
twenty. Escalate 10% each succeeding five year period after
year 20. Initial rent for 1,200 square feet @ $1,050 monthly.
Lease rate is 50% ($525) for construction period; raised to full
rate at certificate of occupancy. Rental accrued and deferred for
six months after completion. Deferred rent paid over the
succeeding three year period. Deferred rent accrues interest at
same rate as City Small Business Loan.
Lease to restrict uses to those operated by Temecula Shuttle
described above. Any sublease, or change of use will require
RDA approval and a reassessment of fair market value based on
the new uses proposed.
ATTACHMENT B
TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR TEMECULA SHUTTLE SMALL BUSINESS LOAN
LOCATION:
FACILITY:
LOAN AMOUNT:
TERMS:
INTEREST RATE:
SECURITY:
City-owned Site at Sixth and Front Streets
APN #922-230-020
Temecula Shuttle Offices/lobby/ticket windows, day lockers,
picnic/snack area, tour coach/wine tour loading/discharge area and rental
office space.
8100,000
20 year amortization due and payable in 5 years. Six month payment
deferrel during construction. Interest to accrue, but payments would not
begin until 6 months from date of note or upon issuance of s Certificate
of Occupancy - whichever occurs first.
10,250% which represents the current Federal Index Rate (5.250%)
plus 5.000%. The rate will be adjusted to Prime if the stipulated
judgment scheduled to be heard on August 7 is approved. (Note: Due
to the usuary rate laws in the State of California the maximum rate that
may be charged by a lender not defined as a mortgage banker, mortgage
broker, bank or savings and loan is 10.000% or the current Federal
Index Rate plus 5,000%)
All new equipment purchased will be collateralized via a UCC filing end
a lien will be placed on the improvements to be constructed on the
leased land.
The Lease Agreement for this property and the Loan Security Agreement
will be cross referenced. In the case of a default on the lease, the loan
would become due and payable. In the case of a default on the loan,
the lease would be terminated.
ATTACH MENT C
ESTIMATED SETTLEMENT STATEMENT FOR ED DOOL
MAIN STREET PROPERTY
APN 922-034-0291
' Amount Amount
Description Fee Approved ' Not
Approved
Total Payoff "-
Interest ~ 9.00% from 4/22 through 5~25
Reimbursement to Ed Dooh Down Payment
Closing Fees
5 months interest only payments ~) t555.00
Appraisal on Wilminton Property
Architechural Renderings
Consulting Fees
Financial Consultant
Book Keeper
174,000.00
t620.50
174,000.00
tl 1,000.00 111,000.00
1660.96 '1660.96
12,775.00 12,775.00
t2,600.00 t2,600.00
t 1,030.00 11,030.00
tl ,912.50 tl ,595.00
t963.30
t175.00
t620.50
t317.50
t963.30
1175.00
Closing Fees:
Title Policy
Sub Escrow Fee
Transfer Tax
Grant Deed
Reconveyance
Escrow Fee
Document Preparation Fee
Padding
Total Fees
t448.00
1100.00
t93.50
t20.00
130.00
1640.00
1155.00
t200.00
197,423.76
193,660.96
t448.00
1100.00
t93.50
t20.00
t30.00
1640.00
tl 56.00
t200.00 -
13,762.80