HomeMy WebLinkAbout050995 CC AgendaIn compliance with the Americana with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in
this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (909) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior
to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to enaure accessibility to that
meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104ADA TnJe II]
AGENDA
TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
A REGULAR MEETING
COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER
30875 RANCHO VISTA ROAD
MAY 9, 1995- 7:00 PM
5:30 PM - Closed Session of the City Council pursuant to Government Code Sectjoe:
1. 954956.8, CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR, Property: Bounded by
Rancho California Road and Ynez Road, a portion of Assessor'a Pamel Number 944-330-006;
NegotiBtjng perde: City of Tamecola and Kempor Real Estate Company: Under negotiation:
Proposed sale of red property.
2. §54956.8, CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR, Property: Bounded by
Margadta Road and Rancho California Road, Negotia~jng Pardes: City of Temecule and Kemper
Real Estate Company: Under Negotiation: Purchase of property.
3. §54956.8, CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR, Property: 43106 Business
Park Ddve; Negotiating pardes: City of Temecula and Grubb and EI~a; Under negotiation:
' pdce and terms of payment.
At approximately 9:45 PM, the City Council will determine which of the remaining
agenda items can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00 PM and may
continue all other items on which additional time is required until a future meeting.
All meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 PM.
CALL TO ORDER:
Invocation:
Flag Salute:
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. 95-08
Resolution: No. 95-41
Mayor Jeffrey Stone presiding
Bishop Konrad Lee, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints
Councilmember Parks
ROLL CALL:
Lindemans, Muftoz, Parks, Roberrs, Stone
PRESENTATIONS/
PROCLAMATIONS
Water Awareness Month
Mental Health Month
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 30 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Council on
items that are not listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited
to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council on an item not listed on the
Agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink 'Request to Speak' form should be filled out
and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all other agenda items a 'Request to Speak' form must be filed with the City Clerk
~ the Council gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual
speakers.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made at
this time. A total, not to exceed, ten (10) minutes will be devoted to these reports.
CONSENT CALENDAR
2
Standard Ordinance Adootion Procedure
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in
the agenda.
Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve the minutes of April 11, 1995.
2.2 Approve the minutes of April 19, 1995.
2.3 Approve the minutes of April 25, 1995.
3
4
5
6
7
Resolution Aoorovina List of Demands
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 95-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING
CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
City Treasurer's Reoort
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Receive and file the City Treasurer's Report as of March 31, 1995.
Contract for Audit Services for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30.1995
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1 Approve a one-year extension with Moreland and Associates to provide audit
services for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1995.
Extension of Banking Services
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1 Approve a two-year extension with First Interstate Bank to provide banking services
through June 30, 1997.
"Please Save Lives - Don't Drink and Drive" Sian Prooram
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1 Approve the "Please Save Lives - Don't Drink and Drive" sign program proposed by
the Temecula Community Partnership.
8
9
Acceptance of Public Improvements in Parcel Mao No. 22629
RECOMMENDATION:
8.1 Accept the public improvements in Parcel Map No. 22629;
8.2 Authorize reduction in Faithful Performance Security amounts for the improvement
of streets and drainage;
8.3 Authorize the release of the Subdivision Monumentation security amount;
8.4 Direct the City Attorney to prepare reconveyance documents;
8.5 Direct the City Clerk to so notify the Developer.
Suoolement No, 006 to Local Aoencv - State Apreement for Federal Aid Project No.
STPLN-5459, I-15/I-215 Corridor Study
RECOMMENDATION:
9.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 95-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING
SUPPLEMENT NO. 006, TO LOCAL AGENCY AGREEMENT NO. 08-5459, BETWEEN
THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE CITY OF TEMECULA
FOR FEDERAL AID PROJECT NO. STPLN-5459, I-15/I-215 CORRIDOR STUDY
10
Summary on the Interim Fire Station
RECOMMENDATION:
10. 1 Receive and file the summary for the interim Fire Station located at Linfield School.
COUNCIL BUSINESS
11 City Attornev Service Analysis
RECOMMENDATION:
11.1 Approve continuation of contract City Attorney services;
11.2 Approve retaining Peter Thorson and Burke, Williams and Sorenson, as the City
Attorney.
R:W~enda%060ll6 4
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: May 2:3, 1995, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, :30875 Rancho
Vista Road, Temecula, California.
R:~e~ende~O~OII6 6
TEM;CULA COMMUNIT~Y'Si:RVICr:S ;:DISTRICT'M;ETINn.i;:.'(To.'be':: held at 78':00) :
4*4~e~4v~4*e~e~e:e~e~e4e~4HH~:~v~HH~ei~:~eee~e~ee~ee~e:~e~e~e~ee~e~e~ee.~e~e~ :"
"....:. :..~.::..:'..:~.· ....:.:.::. ....· .:.:':: .:..?.:.~. '. .... .....:".'..~ ......· ......
Ne~ in Order:
Resoldion: No. CSD 95-02
CALL TO ORDER:
CALL TO ORDER: President Ronald H. Robe~s
ROLL CALL: DIRECTORS: Lindemans, Muf~oz, Parks, Stone, Roberrs
PUBLIC COMMENT:
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Board of
Directors on items that are not listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers
are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Board of Directors on an
item not listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak"
form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all other agenda items e "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk
before the Board of Directors gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for
individual speakers.
Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors, should present a completed pink "Request to
Speak" to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your
name and address for the record.
CONSENT CALENDAR
I Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of April 11, 1995.
1.2 Approve the minutes of April 25, 1995.
DISTRICT BUSINESS
2
TCSD Prooosed Rates and Charaes for FY 1995-96
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 95-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY
SERVICES DISTRICT ON THE FILING OF A REPORT ON THE PROPOSED RATES
AND CHARGES FOR FISCAL YEAR 1995-96 AND SETTING A TIME AND PLACE
FOR A PUBLIC HEARING IN CONNECTION THEREWITH
2.2 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 95-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY
SERVICES DISTRICT AMENDING THE PROCEDURES FOR APPEALING THE
APPLICATION OR IMPLEMENTATION OF RATES AND CHARGES AGAINST
PROPERTY WITHIN THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
3
Naming of Park and Recreation Facilities
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Consider, and if desired, approve the names of two (2) quarter-acre park sites, two
(2) three-acre neighborhood park sites, and a twenty (20) acre community park site.
GENERAL MANAGERS REPORT - Bradley
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT - Nelson
BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT: Next meeting: May 23, 1995, 8:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875
Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California.
TEMECULA:.RPDFyFLOPMENT AGENCY MFI:TINR
CALL TO ORDER:
CALL TO ORDER:
ROLL CALL:
Next ~ Order:
Resolution: No. RDA 95-04
Chairperson Ronald J. Parks presiding
AGENCY MEMBERS: Lindemans, Mu~oz, Roberts, Stone, Parks
PUBLIC COMMENT:
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Redevelopment
Agency on items that are not listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers
are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Agency on an item not
listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink 'Request to Speak' form should
be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all other agenda items a 'Request to Speak' form must be filed with the City Clerk
before the Agency gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual
speakers.
CONSENT CALENDAR
I Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of April 11, 1995;
1.2 Approve the minutes of April 19, 1995;
1.3 Approve the minutes of April 25, 1995.
AGENCY BUSINESS
2 Consideration of Soonsorshio for All Women's Rodeo
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1
Consider sponsoring the All Women's Rodeo hosted by Pro Rodeo Sports Company
of Temecula Valley to be held at Galway Downs on May 20 and 21, 1995.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
AGENCY MEMBER'S REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT: Next Meeting:
Temecula, California.
May 23, 1995, 8:00 PM, 30875 Rancho Vista Road,
R:V~gende%O6Oll6 I
PROCLAMATIONS/
PRESENTATIONS
The City of Temecula
PROCLAMATION
W~, Water Awareness Month is designated to raise the public's understanding
of water distribution, quality and conservation, and to instill the importance of wise water use;
and
WH~:uEAS, continued cmse~vation by all cit~-ens is an essential aspect of maintaining
an adequate water supply now and into the twenty-fh-st century; and
Wl!~wl~-AS, there is an increa,~ng recognition of the interdependence of urban,
agricultural and environmental water users; and
WHEuEAS, the Rancho California Water District and Eastern Municipal Water District
who serve the greater Temecula area consisten~y work with the ~kssocistlon of California Water
Agencies, the California State Department of Water Resources, the California Water Awareness
Committee and other water agencies to increase water awareness;
NO W, THEREFORE, I, Jeffrey E. Stone, on behalf of the City Council of the City of
Temecula, hereby proclaim the month of May to be,
"Water Awareness Month"
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City
of Temecula to be affixed this 9th day of May, 1995.
Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
The City of Temecula
PROCLAMATION
WHEatRAkS, millions of Americans, incl~g children, may expexicnce a mental
disorder at some point during their lives and may suffer devastating consequences as a result;
and ~.
WIiI~,EAS, Americans recognize that comprehensive and accessible mental healthcare
services in their communities can effectively treat many disorders; and
Wtm m~'itl~AS, the guiding principles of community mental healthcare have always been
comprehensiveness, cost-efficiency, effective management, high quality and consumer-responsive
services, and those principles are now being adopted by private and public healthcare agencies;
and
WHKREAS, suite, local and federal governments continue to struggle with ways to
ensure all Americans who need physical and behavioral healthcare services can receive the help
they need;
NOW, T!~ZRI~-FORE, I, Jeffrey E. Stone, on behalf of the City Council of the City of
Temecula, hereby proclaim the month of May to be,
wlVlental Health Month"
and call upon the citizens, public and private institutions, businesses and school in Temecula to
commit to a vision for community mental healthcare through education, volunteerism and
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City
of Temecula to be affixed this 9th day of May, 1995.
Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
ITEM 1
ITEM 2
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
HELD APRIL 11, 1995
A regular meeting of the Temecula City Council was called to order at 7:02 PM at the
Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rsncho Vista Street, Temecula, California. Mayor
Jeffrey E. Stone presiding.
PRESENT 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Lindemans, Muf~oz, Parks,
Stone, Roberrs
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Also present were City Manager Ronald Bradley, City Attorney Peter M. Thorson, and City
Clerk June S. Greek.
PLEDGE OF ALl EGIANCE
The audience was led in the pledge of allegiance by Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans.
PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS
Mayor Stone proclaimed April 22, 1995 to be "Health Fair Expo '95 Day.
Tomi Arborgast received the proclamation.
Dan Dredla and
Larry Hurst, representing the California Society of Municipal Financial Officers, presented two
awards to Mayor Stone as follows: Award of Outstanding Financial Reporting for 1993-94 -
Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) and a Budget Award.
Mayor Stone presented Special Achievement Awards to members of Cub Scout Pack 337 for
earning their Arrow of Light awards; James Tonkins, Erik Kalan, Darrel Knight, Daniel Murphy,
Dana Secor, Aaron Falls, Miles Ortiz, Christopher Carey, Dale Fletcher and Matt Salmi.
Mayor Stone proclaimed April 23, 1995 to be "Santa Margarita River and Creeks Celebration
Day." Lee Backstrand of U.R.G.E. and Norms LaMadrid of the Nature Conservancy received
the proclamation.
Mayor Stone proclaimed April 23, 1995 to be "Serena's Song Week in Temecula." Michelle
Harris, General Manager of the Balloon and Wine Festival, Randy Fleming, Chairman, Melody
Brunsting, Public Relations Director and Steve Art of Sharp Healthcare who are the official
sponsors of Serena's Song received the proclamation.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Kay Cassaro, 31616 Paseo Goleta, re~luested that the Overland Overpass received top priority
on the City's Capital Improvement Projects.
City Clerk Greek read a letter into the record from Mr. Carl Hanover.
Minutes%4%11 ~95 -1 - 05/02/95
CiW Courtoil Minutes ADHI 11, 1995
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Councilmember Parks addressed Ms. Caesaro's comments regarding the Overland Bridge
stating it has been a priority of the Council for the last five years and $2,000,000 have been
expended on design and land acquisition.
Councilmember Roberts reported that the Western Bypass has been designed to divert traffic
from Winchester and Rancho California Road. He explained this is one part of the overall plan
to move traffic smoothly.
Mayor Stone explained the Overland Overcrossing is a $14 million dollar expenditure which
is linked to development in Temecula. He also stated the City is working with the State to
obtain funding. He also stated the neighboring Indian Reservation is building a casino and
concerns have been expressed by neighbors that since a management company is not being
used, they may be exempt from the BIA approval process and the National Environmental
Protection Act. City Attorney Thorson reported the tribe will need to go through the NEPA
process. Mayor Stone asked if any dialog has been started?
City Manager Bradley reported that he has been assured that when this project is brought
forward, the City will have the opportunity to discuss their concerns.
Councilmember Roberts reported that as the liaison with Pechanga Tribe, he understands the
casino will be very small and a news conference will be held shortly. After that point, he
reported the Pechanga Tribal Council has indicated it will be happy to work with the City.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Councilmember Roberts requested the removal of Item No. 9 from the Consent Calendar.
Mayor Stone corrected the minutes of March 14, 1995, stating the recommendation regarding
maintenance of unpaved streets was made by Councilmember Muffoz.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans to approve
Consent Calendar Items 1-8 and 10 and 11 with a correction on Item 2.2.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Lindemans, Muf~oz, Parks, Roberts, Stone
None
None
Minutes%4%11%95 -2- 06/02/95
~ City Council Minute April 11.1995
e
Standard Ordinance Adootion Procedure
1.1 Motion to waive the reading
included in the agenda.
Minutes
2.1
2.2
2.3
of the text of
all ordinances and resolutions
Approve the minutes of February 28, 1995.
Approve the minutes of March 14, 1995, as corrected.
Approve the minutes of March 21, 1995.
Resolution ADoroving List of Demands
3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 95-33
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT .A
City Treasurer's Report
4.1 Receive and file the City Treasurer's Report as of February 28, 1995.
Award Bid to Construct a Protected Left-Turn Lane on Ynez Road at Tierra Vista Road
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1
Award a bid to construct a protected left-turn lane on Ynez Road at Tierra Vista
Road to Del Rio Contractors, the lowest responsible bidder, for the sum of
$12,170.00.
Release Traffic Signal Mitigation Bond in Tract No. ~6861-F
6.1
Authorize the release of Traffic Signal Mitigation Bond in Tract No. 26861-F,
and Direct the City Clerk to so notify the Developer and Surety.
Minutee%4~11 ~95 -3- 05/02/95
City Council Minute ADril 11, 1995 ~
e
e
Acceptance of Public Streets into City-Maintained Street System (Within Parcel MaDs
No. 23561-1. 23561-2. and 23624)
7.1 Adopt a resolution emitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 95-34
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA,
CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY
MAINTAINED-STREET SySTEM (WITHIN PARCEL MAPS NO. 23561-1,23561-
2 AND 23624)
All-Way "Stoo" - Pala Road at Loma Linda Road
8.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 95-35
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
ESTABLISHING 'STOP SIGNS"
THE CITY OF TEMECULA
10.
Reduction in Imorovement Bonds Amounts in Parcel MaD No. ~ 1383
10. 1 Accept the street, drainage, water and sewer improvements in Parcel Map No.
21383;
10.2
Authorize the release of Faithful Performance and Labor and Material Bonds for
Street, Drainage, Water, and Sewer improvements, and the Subdivision
Monument Bond;
10.3 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Surety.
SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES
11. Second Reading of Ordinance No. 95-07
11.1
Adopt an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 95-07
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
AMENDING CHAPTER 2.04 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING
TO THE TIME AND PLACE OF CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS
Mirmtee~4'd 1~95 -4- 05/02/95
/,_.. CiW Council Minute Aorll 11, 1995
9
Solicitation of Construction Bids for the Parkview Site Rough Grading and
Imorovements. Project No. PW93-09
Councilmember Roberrs stated he has had communication with the Lutheran Church,
and understood grading plans have been revised a number of times. He asked that the
MOU between City and church be followed and requested that this project move
forward at a faster pace.
Councilmember Parks announced he has a conflict of interest on this item and will
abstain from the vote.
It was moved by Councilmember Roberrs, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans to
approve staff recommendation as follows:
9.1 Approve the Project construction plans and specifications;
9.2
Authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit public construction bids for
the rough grading improvements for a portion of the Parkview Site, Project No.
PW93-09.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Lindemans, Mufioz, Roberts, Stone
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
I COUNCILMEMBERS: Parks
COUNCIL BUSINESS
9. School Mitioation Resolution
Councilmembers Muf~oz and Parks announced a conflict of interest and stepped down
from the dies.
Planning Director Gary Thornhill introduced Associate Planner David Hogan who
presented the staff report.
Kenneth Ray, 31647 Pio Pico Road, spoke in favor of the resolution.
Rod Henway, 3600 Lime Street, No. 221, Riverside, representing the Building Industry
Association of Riverside County, spoke in opposition to the Resolution. He stated if the
City feels fees need to be increased, it should consider using the San Jose Ordinance
as a model. He recommended the following changes:
Minutes%4~. 11%95 -5- 05/02/95
City Council Minutes April 11, 1995
P. 11, Item 3A.6 - eliminate the phrase total mitigation.
P. 12, Item 4 - process for City Council approval. As read there is no legally defensible
reason for denying. Add grounds to make a finding to reject the mitigation plan.
P. 13, - mitigation agreement not be required to be implemented at the time the
application is submitted, but toward end of project.
· A process for resolution of impasse be added.
· Add a refund provision.
· Require annual review of plan, updated to reflect legislative changes, building
trends and costs of construction.
· Provide for an amendment process in case State makes changes.
Councilmember Roberrs asked why these concerns were not addressed earlier.
Mr. Hanway stated he sent a three page letter to the Superintendent of Schools and
the City Councilmembers, proposing a wide range of options. He said as of this date
he has not received a response to his letter.
Dennis Chiniaeff, 27555 Ynez Road, No. 202, spoke in opposition of the resolution
and suggested if the resolution is adopted, that the City Council give direction to the
School District on what kind of percentage the City Council is willing to accept.
Dr. Pat Novotney, School Superintendent, 37433 Avenida Japala, spoke in support of
the resolution, listing quality schools as the goal of the District.
Councilmember Robarts stated he has a problem with Section 5(C2), page 15 and
would like it stricken. He stated he does not believe new development should be
burdened with 100% mitigation. However, he added he feels the resolution needs to
be adopted so that discussions may proceed.
Mayor Stone stated he agrees that Section 5C2 should be stricken with the following
language added: "shall be the full and complete responsibility of the District. To that
end the District shall indemnify, protect, defend and hold harmless the City against any
loss, cost, expense, claim, damage, settlement or judgement resulting from a lawsuit
or any part thereof pertaining to the contents of this resolution."
Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans asked that a sentence be added that mitigation will not be
100%.
Mayor Stone stated he would give his personal commitment that he would not
support 100% mitigation.
City Attorney Thorson stated Mr. Alhadeff suggested language on page 3 of his
redlined version, No. 3, that would indicate the plan would not adequately address
impacts if it imposes 100% of the costs of meeting such impacts on new residential
developments. Mr. Thorson recommended this be addressed during development of
Minutes\4~,l 1%95 -6- 05/02/95
~ CiW Council Minute April 11.1995
the mitigation plan, when Council has a factual basis to determine what the
percentages should be. He indicated this would be a more defensible decision.
It was moved by Councilmember Robarts, seconded by Mayor Stone to approve staff
recommendation as amended in Section 5C on Page 14 and with the elimination of
Section 5-C2 on Page 15 of the resolution.
12.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 95-36
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
APPROVING THE SCHOOL FACILITY IMPACT MITIGATION PROGRAM
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 3 COUNCILMEMBERS: Lindemans, Roberrs, Stone
NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSTAIN: 2 COUNCILMEMBERS: Muftoz, Parks
TEMECULA
RECESS
Mayor Stone called a recess at 8:34 PM. The meeting was reconvened following the
previously scheduled Community Services District and Redevelopment Agency Meeting at
9:11 PM.
10.
Prooosal for Installation of Flashino Warnin; Liohts in the Vicinity of Temecula Schools
(Requested by Mayor Stone - Continued from the meeting of 3128t95)
Public Works Director Joe Kicak presented the staff report.
Councilmember Muf~oz asked that discussions with the Temecula Valley Unified School
District regarding cost sharing on the project be explored.
Public Works Director Kicak stated he believes there is a willingness to consider this
on the part of the School District and he will pursue it.
Councilmember Robarts questioned the location of two signals at Sparkman Elementary
School. He suggested that two signals on Pio Pico Road are not as critical as placing
them on La Serena Road for the Rancho Elementary School.
Minutee~4%11 ~,95 -7- 05/02/95
CiW Council Minutes Auril 11, 1995
RECESS
Mayor Stone called a recess at 9:20 PM to change the tape. The meetinD was reconvened
at 9:21 PM.
Councilmember Parks asked if this item has been reviewed by the Public/Traffic Safety
Commission. Public Works Director Kicak stated Council directed this item be placed
directly on the Council agenda. +-
Mayor Stone stated he does not have a problem with the Commission reviewing this
item, however he is worried about the safety of school children.
It was moved by Mayor Pro Tam Lindamans, seconded by Councilmember Parks to
continue this item for 30 days to allow the Public/Traffic Safety Commission to review
this proposal as well as to allow staff to pursue shared funding with the School
District. The motion was unanimously carried.
Hearing no objections from the Council, Mayor Stone reordered the agenda to hear Item No.
17.
17. Traffic Control Winchester Road at Jefferson Avenue and I-15 On/Off Ramos
Public Works Director Joe Kicak presented the staff report.
Councilmember Roberts questioned the need for two officers at Winchester &
Jefferson.
Councilmember Mufioz questioned the feasibility of the program based on saturated
capacity of the intersection.
Public Works Director Joe Kicak suggested using police officers to test the program.
Patricia H. Birdsall, 41540Avenida Barca, made the following suggestions: One, better
enforcement of traffic signals so that cars do not block the intersection; and two, using
cones to allow for two lanes in the direction the traffic is most congested, depending
upon the time of day. She stated that this method has been very successful in Hawaii.
She expressed concerns regarding the safety of traffic directors, especially during the
winter months when lighting is an issue.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Robarts to
approve staff recommendation with direction to the City Attorney to place a clause in
the agreement that allows the contract to be terminated, if after a trial period it is
shown to be unsuccessful. Further direction was given to refer this program to the
Public/Traffic Safety Commission for periodic review and monitoring.
Minuteg%4%11Lq5 -8- 05/02/95
/~- Ciw Council Minute ADHI 11. 1995
17.1 Authorize the City Manager to enter into an agreement to provide Traffic
Control Officers at Winchester road at the intersections of Jefferson and I-15
easterly and westerly one/off ramps, subject to review and approval by the City
Attorney.
17.2 Transfer $11,880from General Fund Unreserved Fund Balance and appropriate
it in Public Works Traffic Division Account No. 100-164-602-5250 "Other
Outside Services."
The motion was unanimously carried,
Public Works Director Joe Kicak stated the execution of this contract will depend on
the ability of the Company to provide the required insurance.
Councilmember Parks stated he would like the City to assist the contractor in obtaining
insurance if possible.
14. Overland Drive Overcrossina - Status Report
(Continued from the meeting of 3/28/95)
Councilmember Muf~oz stepped down due to a conflict of interest.
Public Works Director Joe Kicak presented the staff report,
It was moved by Mayor Pro Tern Lindemans, seconded by Councilmember Roberrs to
receive and file the report.
The motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Lindemans, Parks, Robarts, Stone
NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSTAIN: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Muf~oz
Staff was further directed to follow up with Edison on how quickly utilities can be
relocated so that construction can proceed with the Overland bridge.
It was moved by Councilmember Robarts, seconded by Councilmember Parks to extend the
meeting until 10:15 PM. The motion was unanimously carried.
Mayor Stone announced that consideration of a funding request from Riverside County Child
Care Consortium would not be heard at this meeting, however the request by Operation
School Bell would be discussed.
MinuTes~4%11 ~,95 -9- 05/02/95
CiW Council Minutes April 11.1995 ,~
11.
Street Maintenance and/or Constr, ction of Unoaved Streets
(Continued from the meeting of 3128/95)
Mayor Stone excused himself due to a conflict of interest.
Public Works Director Joe Kicek presented the staff report.
Councilmember Mufioz asked if this would in any way put the CSD funding at risk.
City Attorney Thorson stated that road maintenance is not a capital outlay, therefore
funding would not be at risk.
Councilmember Mufioz stated this program was originally designed to respond to the
emergency needs of residents and was never intended to be a permanent solution. He
stated he feels if property owners are not willing to fund improvements, the City should
stop maintaining the roads.
Councilmember Parks suggested approaching property owners on cost of grading the
roads four times of year.
Councilmember Roberts asked if the City begins maintaining these roads and then is
unable to continue, would the City carry any kind of liability. City Attorney Thorson
stated that that if the decision were made in the dry months as a policy decision, the
City would not be responsible.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Mufioz to direct
staff to establish the benefit zones and fees for emergency maintenance to be assessed
under TCSD Service Level R.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES:
4 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Mu~oz, Lindemans, Parks, Roberts
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSTAIN: I
COUNCILMEMBERS: Stone
Director of Community Services Shawn Nelson explained there may be · timing issue
with levy of this assessment for implementation this year.
RECESS
Mayor Stone called a brief
reconvened at 10:22 PM,
recess at 10:21 PM to change the tape. The meeting was
IVinutee%4~ 11%95 - 1 O- 05/02/95
,~- Citv Council Minute April 11, 1995
16.
18.
19.
Community Services Fundins Prosram
(Continued from the meeting of 3/28/95)
Assistant City Manager Mary Jane McLamey presented the staft report.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans to
continue consideration of the Riverside County Child Care Consortium and approve the
$1,000 funding Grant for the Assistance League Operation School Bell. The motion
was unanimously carried.
Real Property Transfer Tax
City Manager Ronald Bradley presented the staff report.
Councilmember Mufioz asked if there is any value to obtaining an Attorney General's
Opinion on this issue.
City Attorney Thorson stated the Attorney General's opinion still carries no guarantees.
He indicated an opinion of the legislative council can go quickly, however the Attorney
General's Opinion takes longer. .'
It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans, seconded by Councilmember Parks to
receive and file the report with direction to the City Attorney to pursue an opinion of
Legislative Counsel on this matter. The motion was unanimously carried.
Reouest for City Council Suooort of the Western Riverside Council of Governments
(WRCOG) Position on the Reauthorization of the Federal Endangered Species Act
Planning Director Gary Thornhill presented the staff report.
Rod Hanway, 3600 Lime Street, No. 221, Riverside, representing the Building Industry
Association, spoke in favor of staff recommendation.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Muftoz to
approve staff recommendation.
19.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 95-37
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
SUPPORTING AMENDMENTS TO THE FEDERAL ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT
The motion was unanimously carried.
Minutee%4~11 ~95 -11- 05/02/95
Citv Council Minutes April 11.1995
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
City Manager Bradley reported that tomorrow, April 12th, traffic signals will be turned on at
Nicolas & Winchester. Additionally, signals will be activated on Thursday, April 13th, at
Margarita Road and Avenida Barca and on 79S, the right turn lane at Pale Road has been
completed and is operational.
Councilmember Mufioz suggested a ribbon cutting for traffic signals, especially at the Nicolas
and Winchester intersection.
CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT
None given.
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Councilmember Roberts, seconded by Councilmember Parks to adjourn at
10:43 PM to e Joint Council, RDA, Planning Commission Meeting on April 19, 1995, 7:00
PM, Rancho California Water District Board Room, 42135 Winchester Road, Temecula,
California. The motion was unanimously carried.
Next regular meeting: April 25, 1995, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875
Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California.
Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, CMC
City Clerk
Minutee~,4~l 1 ~95 -12- 05/02/95
MINUTES OF A JOINT MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL/TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
AND THE TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION
HELD APRIL 19, 1995
A joint meeting of the Temecula City Council, Redevelopment Agency and the Temecula
Planning Commission was called to order in the Board Room of the Rancho California Water
District at 7:04 PM, Mayor Jeffrey E. Stone presiding.
PRESENT 4
ABSENT: 1
PRESENT: 4
ABSENT: I
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
Mutioz, Parks, Robarts, Stone
Lindemans
Fahey, Ford, Slavin, Webster
Blair
Also present were City Manager Ronald E. Bradley, City Attorney Peter Thorsen, Planning
Director Gary Thornhill and City Clerk June S. Greek.
PL;:DGI: OF AI LI:tqANCI:
The audience was led in the Pledge of Allegiance by Commission Chairman Steve Ford.
PUBLIC COMMI:NTS
There were no public comments offered.
COUNCIl/COMMISSION REPORTS
Councilmember Parks requested the members of the audience, commission and council
observe a moment of silent prayer for the victims of the Oklahoma City bombing
tragedy.
Councilmember Roberrs reported briefly on the on-going efforts to place traffic directors
at the Winchester/Jefferson intersection and Winchester overpass.
COUNCIL CONSRTT CALI:NDAR
Substitute Public Imorovement Aoreement in Parcel Mao No. 91383
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Robarts to
approve the following staff recommendations:
R:Velinutee%041996 -1- 06/02/96
City Coul'ldl MilluTel ADdl 19. 1995
1.1
Approve the substitute agreement for completion of street improvements in
Parcel Map No. 21383.
1.2
Authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement and the City Clerk to so attest
and have recorded.
1.3 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Surety.
The motion was unanimously carried with Mayor Pro Tam Undemans absent.
CITY COUNCIl/R;DI:VPLOPMENT AGI:NCY/PLANNING COMMISSION BUSINESS
Status and Information Reoort on the Proposed Old Town Redevelooment Project and
Performina Arts District
The joint meeting of the Council, Agency and Commission was called to order by
Agency Chairperson Ronald J. Parks. Agency Member Stone announced he would
step down due to a potential conflict of interest. .-
Planning Director Gary Thomhill introduced the staff report and outlined the matters to
be covered during the workshop.
Assistant Planner Matthew Fagin presented the Westside Specific Plan and the Master
Conditional Use Permit for the Old Town Entertainment Project.
Councilmember Mufioz questioned if the Master Conditional Use Permit is limited to the
number of uses listed in the staff report. Planner Fagin responded that any additional
uses would require another Conditional Use Permit. Councilmember Mufioz stated he
objects to any high density residential in Area D of the Westside Specific Plan.
Commissioner Webster asked if the architectural style proposed for the residential in
Planning Area D will be compatible with that of the Hotel and Neighborhood
Commercial Center. Planning Director Thornhill stated the architectural style would be
required to be compatible at the time plans are submitted.
Principal Engineer Ray Casey addressed the traffic conditions projected by the City'e
traffic consultant. He advised that all intersections will be at equal or better levels of
service, at build-out, compared to currently existing conditions. He also stated that
one-half of the intersections show an improvement at build-out over the present level
of service. Mr. Casey also outlined the locations of the proposed parking facilities.
Commissioner Slavin asked if the use of parking structures versus parking lots had
been explored. Engineer Casey responded that staff analysis showed this is not an
economically viable solution.
R:~Vlinutee~041995 -2- 05/02/95
City Cman~il Minute Amtl 19. 1995
Councilmember Roberts asked when the realignment of Front Street and the possible
realignment of Pujol Street would be addressed with the City Council. Mr. Casey
stated this could be done during the preliminary design phase.
Councilmember Parks questioned the timing of the Murrieta Creek Channel
improvements. Mr. Casey advised that the project does not have a responsibility to
improve the creek to its ultimate solution.
Councilmember Parks also questioned when the loop ramps at the I-15 and Highway
79 South intersection will be completed. Mr. Casey responded that this is projected
to be completed by the year 2010.
Councilmember Mu~oz asked if the land owners in the proposed Benefit Assessment
District have been polled to determine their willingness to participate in the Western
Bypass Parkway Assessment District. City Manager Bradley stated he was unable to
respond regarding all of the possible owners.
Associate Planner David Hogan presented the General Plan and Specific Plan
Consistency and the Environmental Impact Report.
Tom Dodson, the consultant who prepared the Environmental Impact Report, pointed
out the comparable acreage between the General Plan and the Westside Specific Plan.
Pat Fay, 31235 Calla Felicidad, spoke in favor of local contractors having the
opportunity to be trained in how to bid on sub-contracts with Fluor Daniel. He
recommended the City hold classes to show local contractors how to submit pre-bid
qualifications, etc.
Commissioner Slavin clarified that the City could act as a facilitator but would not fund
such a training program.
Commissioner Fahey discussed the need for the Planning Commission to be aware of
the Council/Agency members goals and how they would like to have the Commission
proceed with this project.
Councilmember Mufioz said he would like the commission to look at Planning Area D
of the Westside Specific Plan relative to the density designation. He also indicated he
would like them to address his concern on the impact high density residential will have
on the escarpment. He further stated he wants to insure the limits on the permitted
uses in the Master Conditional Use Permit are established as the upper limits allowed
for Old Town. Lastly, he said he feels the Highway 79 South and I-15 circulation and
impacts of the improvements should be looked at as they will affect the southerly end
of the City and neighboring communities.
Commissioner Slavin expressed concerns with the paring needs of the project and
stated she would like to see further consideration of the use of parking structures.
Chairman Ford asked to have a breakdown of the dollars available to spend for parking
R:~VinuteeV)41996 -3- 06/02/95
City Coundl Minute ,Af, ffi 19. 1996
structures at the present time and those that would be available to spend at a later
date.
Councilmember Robarts said he feels Planning Area D should be carefully studied as
to the density issue and asked staff to keep the Council and Commission updated
regarding possible realignments of Front and Pujol Streets. He also expressed concern
that the signal and ramp widening at I-15 and Highway 79-South be completed prior
to opening of the project.
Councilmember Parks asked that the Agency and the Planning Commission have an
open mind with regard to Area D and allow review of suggested designs before ruling
out possible developments solely on the basis of density. He also suggested the
development of Area D may result in tradeoffs which could expedite construction of
the Bridge over Murriats Creek. Member Parks also shared in the concerns regarding
timing of the I-15/Highway 79-South intersection signalization and ramp widening and
agreed that some structural parking should be considered for the Old Town project.
Commissioner Webster expressed concern that the area designated Tourist Retail may
compete with the existing businesses located in Old Town. He further expressed a
desire to assure the architectural styles of the Wild West Arena and the Hotel Complex
are aesthetically compatible with the escarpment.
Commissioner Fahey asked that the Council/Agency let the Planning Commission know
how they should be communicating with the Council/Agency during the development
of the project.
Commissioner Slavin stated she is concerned that the publicized opening date not drive
the project and stressed that attention to quality should be the driving force.
Planning Director Thornhill, in response to a question from Councilmember Muftoz,
stated the Master Conditional Use Permit is only for the project as proposed. He said
staff is working on an ordinance that will restrict future entertainment facilities in the
Old Town area.
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Chairman Ford, seconded by Commissioner Slavin to adjourn to the
next regularly scheduled meeting of the Planning Commission to be held May 1, 1995
at the Rancho California Water District Board Room. The motion was unanimously
carried.
It was moved by Councilmember Robarts, seconded by Councilmember Mufioz to
adjourn to the meeting of April 25, 1995 to be held at the Community Recreation
Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California.
R:tMinutee~O41995 -4- 05/02/96
City Council Minute ADHI 19. 1995
CITY MANAGFR RFPORTS
No report given.
CITY ATTORNEY REPORTS
No report given.
ATTEST:
Ronald J. Parks, Chairman
Temecula Redevelopment Agency
June S. Greek, CMC
City Clerk/Agency Secretary
R:~Vlinutee~041996 -S- 05/02/95
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
HELD APRIL 25, 1995
A regular meeting of the Temecula City Council was called to order at 7:05 PM at the Community
Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. Mayor Jeffrey E. Stone
presiding.
PRESENT: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Lindemans, Mufloz, Parks,
Roberts, Stone
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Also present were City Manager Ronald Bradley, City Attorney Peter M. Thorson and Deputy City
Clerk Susan W. Jones.
EXECUTIVE SESSION
A meeting of the City of Temecula City Council was called to order at 5:37 PM. It was moved by
Councilmember Roberta, seconded by Councilmember Muttoz to adjourn to Executive Session
pursuant to Government Code Sections:
1. §54956.8, CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR, Property: Bounded by Sixth
Street, Front Street and Mercedes, Negotiating parties; Edward and Kathleen Dool and the City of
Temecula; Under Negotiation - Proposed Sale or Lease of City Owned Property.
2. §54956.8, CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR, Property bounded by Calle
Empleado, Avenida de Vertas/Winchester Road; Negotiating parties City of Temecula and Professional
Hospital Supply; Under Negotiation - Owner Participation Agreement.
The motion was unanimously carried.
Councilmember Parks joined the Executive Session at 6:05 PM.
City Attorney Peter Thorson announced there was no closed session action to report.
INVOCATION
The invocation was given by Pastor Mike McNeff, Valley Christian Fellowship.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The audience was led in the flag salute by Councilmember Muttoz.
R:~Mbueee~042616 -1-
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Kay Cassaro, 31616 Paseo Goleta, explained that she was back again to lobby for relief in the traffic
jams on Winchester, which are intolerable. She has heard that it may be ten years before the
Overland Bridge is built, because there just isn't enough money. She has read that the City Council
is considering the purchase of · municipal golf course and performing arts center, yet there are no
funds for the overpass, which must be low on .the City's priority list. She suggested a three-step
program: 1) a hold on all new housing projects and major business construction until traffic
congestion is a thing of the past; 2) construction of the Overland Overpass, and 3) the initiation of
plans for an additional freeway on/offramp north of Winchester.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Councilmember Robarts reminded everyone that this is the weekend of the Balloon and Wine Festival;
the first balloon glow is Friday evening.
Mayor Pro Tam Lindemans read · prepared statement, which, he stressed, had nothing to do with
the previous speaker. He referred to reading an interview with the City Manager regarding the
Overland Bridge in ten years. He stated CFD 88-12 should pay for it after 750 square feet of retail
space is rented in a regional center, which would take nine years. He also discussed the duck pond
and the Temecula Country Club Golf Course. He stated that Council needs to get together to decide
what the City's needs are; he stressed that he sees only one need, and that is solving a tremendous
traffic problem.
Mayor Stone spoke regarding the Oklahoma City disaster. An overhead was displayed providing an
address where citizens could make · contribution to the Salvation Army, to be used exclusively for
burials of victims. He said cannisters will also be set up at Costco, Kmart and Target and checks may
be made payable to the City of Temecule. Donations will be collected on Monday, end the funds
forwarded to the Salvation Army.
Mayor Stone also paid tribute to a new business in the community called Valley Funeral Home; John
Weissgiver, the Director, has donated two caskets, which he will send, at his expense, to help with
this endeavor.
Mayor Stone requested staff look into a process called spray filling to address filling potholes more
quickly after storms.
Mayor Pro Tam Lindemans asked that this item be placed on the next agenda.
City Manager Bradley stated staff will bring it back to Council as quickly as possible.
CONSENT CALI:NDAR
Councilmember Muf~oz announced he would abstain on Items Nos. 8, 9 and 12, due to conflicts of
interest.
Councilmember Robarts asked if the funding on Item No. 13 is through CDBG or special assessment,
and Director of Public Works/City Engineer Kicak answered it is from CDBG.
It was moved by Councilmember Roberrs, seconded by Councilmember Parks to approve Consent
Calendar Items 1-13. The motion was unanimously carried with Councilmember Mu~oz abstaining
on Items Nos. 8, 9 and 12.
I Standard Ordinance Adoption Procedure
1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the
agenda.
2 Minutes
2.1 Approve the minutes of March 28, 1995.
3
4
Resolution Aoorovina List of Demands
3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 95-38
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING
CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
Citv Treasurer's Statement of Investment Policy
4.1 Adopt the Treasurer's Statement of Investment Policy as proposed by staff which
provides safety, liquidity and yield for City funds.
Award of Contract for Weed Abatement Services
5.1
Approve an Award of Contract for weed abatement services on an as-needed basis to
Don Dixon as primary, Rory Rieck as secondary and Smith Tractor and Bill Baldwin as
alternates.
6
Records Destruction Aooroval
6.1 Approve scheduled destruction of certain records as provided under the City of
Temecula approved Records Retention Policy.
7
Release of Fire Mitioation Bond in Tract ~6861-F
7.1 Authorize the release of Fire Mitigation Bond in Tract No. 26861-F;
7.2 Direct the City Clerk to so notify the Developer and Surety.
8
1-15/Winchester Road (Route 79N) Interchange Imorovements. Construction Coooerative
Agreement with State Deoartment of Transportation
8.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 95-39
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT NO. 8-939, BETWEEN THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION AND THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE
WINCHESTER ROAD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS
The motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Lindemens, Parks, Roberrs, Stone
NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSTAIN: I COUNCILMEMBERS: Mu~oz
Release Imorovement Bonds for Plot Plan No. 10079
9.1 Authorize release of Faithful Performance end Labor and Material Bonds for
Construction of access roadway for Plot Plan No. 10079 (Tower Plaza Office Building);
9.2
The motion carried by the following vote:
Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Surety.
AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Lindemans, Parks, Roberrs, Stone
NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSTAIN: I COUNCILMEMBERS: Mufioz
10
Comoletion end
Prooram
Accectance of Project No. PW94-13 - FY94-95 City Wide p.r-.C. Repair
10.1 Accept the FY94-95 Citywide P.C.C.
complete and direct the City Clerk to:
Repair Program, Project No. PW94-13 as
File the Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a one
(1) year Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract;
Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after the filing of the
Notice of Completion if no liens have been filed.
11
12
Comoletion end Acceotance of Project No. PW94-1 ~ - FY94-95 Slurrv Seal Project
11.1 Accept the FY94-95 Slurry Seal Project, Project No. PW94-12 as complete and direct
the City Clerk to:
File the Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a one
(1) year Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract;
Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after the filing of the
Notice of Completion if no liens have been filed.
Award of Professional Services Contract to Trans-Pacific Consultants for the Design of the
FY94-95 Annual Pavement Manaaement Project No. PW95-06
12.1
Approve and authorize the Mayor to sign the Professional Services Agreement between
the City of Temecula and Trans-Pacific Consultants R'PC) to provide Engineering
Services for the design of the FY94-95 Annual Pavement Management Project - Project
No. PW95-06 for an amount not to exceed $49,910.00.
The motion carried by the following vote:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
AYES: 4
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 0
ABSTAIN: I
Lindemans, Parks, Robarts, Stone
None
None
Mufioz
13
Solicitation of Construction Bids and Aooroval of the Plans and Soecifications for the Handicap
Access Ramo Imorovements. 'Project No. PW95-04
13.1
Approve the Plans and Specifications and authorize the Department of Public Works
to solicit public construction bids for Project No. PW95-04, Handicap Access Ramp
Improvements,
PUBLIC HFARINGS
14 Public Nuisance Abatement- 30301 Nicolas Road
Chief Building Official Tony Elmo presented the staff report.
Councilmember Parks asked if several absentee owners could not get together to make a
decision, or if the property is owned by a limited or general partnership; have the property
owners been made aware of this hearing?
Chief Building Official Elmo stated it was very difficult to get input from 811 seven property
owners; staff is not aware of the type of partnership; notices have been sent to all owners
through certified mail.
Councilmember Robarts said when Council voted to place this item on the agenda he raised
the issue of the large attorney fees and was told that he would receive a breakdown of these
fees; he has not received a breakdown.
City Attorney Thorson responded listing the number of notices and hearings required as a
result of the multiple ownerships. He advised that the partners were in various parts of the
country, as well as, just not cooperating.
Mayor Pro Tam Lindemans questioned the $68,000 to clean-up all the concrete and steel on
the property; was the metal sold for scrap and used to offset the $68,000, or was it all junk;
does the $68,000 carry interest, as it becomes a lien on the property.
Chief Building Official Elmo reiterated that those funds covered everything mentioned in the
staff report, including boarding up the large warehouse building, which had the most worth;
all other foundations, underground piping and other small outbuildings have been removed.
Environmental Control Systems, Inc. took the metal and whatever they could recover through
the recycling processes was given to them.
In answer 'to Mayor Pro Tam Lindemans question regarding interest, City Attorney Thorson
explained that, if it is not paid within the time period to pay the taxes on the property, it will
take on the penalties under the property tax laws.
Mayor Stone stated he received a couple of calls from residents who are concerned with the
weeds, which are a fire hazard; he confirmed that staff will still maintain their examination of
this property as time goes on.
Chief Building Official Elmo said he would bring this concern to the attention of Code
Enforcement.
Councilmember Mu~oz stated the weeds are not being paid attention to as much as he might
have them and asked if sign enforcement was being addressed vigorously?
Chief Building Official Elmo advised that staff's concentration on weed abatement is a very
intense, full-time job with one project employee involved and 1,200 parcels inspected and
posted this year for inclusion on the tax rolls.
Mayor Stone opened the public hearing at 7:25 PM. Hearing no requests to speak, the public
hearing was closed at 7:25 PM.
It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans, seconded by Councilmember Roberts to approve
staff recommendation as follows:
14.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 9540
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA,
CONFIRMING THE CITY'S COSTS OF ABATING THE PUBLIC NUISANCE AT 30301
NICOLAS ROAD, TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA AND DIRECTING THAT SUCH COSTS
SHALL CONSTITUTE A LIEN AGAINST THE PROPERTY.
14.2 Direct that such costs be recorded against the property as a special assessment.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES:
5 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Lindemans, Muf~oz, Parks, Roberts, Stone
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
COUNCIL BUSINI=SS
15 Reouest from Deoartment of Transoortation - Suooort to Divert ~300.O00from RSTP to CTAP
Director of Public Works/City Engineer Kicak presented the staff report.
Councilmember Parks Questioned if the purpose of this money is to train staff, as well as,
members of the State in matters related to State highways.
Director of Public Works Kicak explained that it is basically traffic safety open to staff
members at a discount (40 to 100%).
16
Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans questioned the City's share of $11,799.
Director of Public Works Kicak reiterated the total of $1 '1,799 represents the contribution from
all of the Riverside County agencies.
Mayor Pro Tam Lindemans requested that this item be sent back to staff to see where the full
share of Riverside County's apportionment is and how much is the City's.
City Manager Bradley explained that one-tenth of one percent is $300,O00,000at the Federal
level; it is distributed all over the United States; RCTC receives $5.9 million; training accounts
for the $11,799. He said it is proposed to use the $11,799 for other purposes.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Robarts to direct staff
to prepare the questionnaire from the State of California, Department of Transportation,
expressing their support of Caltrans' continued diversion of $300,000 of local agency RSTP
funds and $300,000 of State Highway Account funds for CTAP.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES:
4 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Mufioz, Parks, Robarts, Stone
NOES: I COUNCILMEMBERS: Lindemans
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Aooroval of Street Closure - May ~. 1995
Mayor Stone stepped down from the dais due to a conflict of interest.
Director of Public Works/City Engineer Joe Kicak presented the staff report. He added that
staff received a request from Temecula Productions to change the closure from 6:30 AM to
6:30 PM, as indicated in the staff report, to 5:00 AM to 3:00 PM. The closure would occur
on Main Street between Pujol and Front Streets.
Councilmember Robarts questioned staff as to why this request is coming before City Council;
the City has requests for road closure permits consistently, which is at a staff level.
City Manager Bradley explained that he has been informed that the Council has not adopted
a policy giving staff authority to grant street closures; in most cities this is an administrative
function that takes 24 hours at best.
Councilmember Parks said he has been conversing with staff on how to implement a policy
to come back to Council; once the policy is set, staff deals with the details. He asked if the
businesses have been notified.
Director of Public Works Kicak explained that the production company will notify the
businesses. He informed Council that "TemporaryNo Parking" signs will be posted twenty-
four hours ahead of time on Main Street, barricades at Front and Pujol Streets will be provided
at 5:00 AM, adequate police control regarding traffic and provisions have been made for
emergency vehicles. He continued that all departments have been involved in discussing this
issue, which will help to make this closure run smoothly.
City Manager Bradley reiterated that all of the Old Town merchants were notified by letter by
the Old Town Main Street Merchants Association that the closure would occur pending City
Council approval.
Councilmember Parks stated he has no problem with the closure; he requested that we notify
all of the residents on Pujol Street regarding access to the street and the need to use Rancho
California Road.
City Manager Bradley confirmed that this will be done.
Councilmember Roberrs asked if staff wanted direction from the Council regarding an
ordinance.
City Manager Bradley asked for approval for this street closure and informed Council that staff
will be bringing back a policy for Council's adoption.
Councilmember Roberrs addressed the fact that in the meantime before this new policy comes
to Council, if there is another request, perhaps Council should give direction of what to do
until policy is approved.
Steve Hasson, 6333 Canoga Avenue, Woodland Hills, CA, thanked Council for allowing him
to address this issue; he indicated he is the Location Manager of the production company. He
informed Council that his company will post "No Street Parking" signs 48 hours in advance.
He asked if Council had any questions.
Councilmember Muf~oz asked if the information he would be posting is in English and Spanish?
Mr. Hasson answered he would speak with the City to see if someone could do the translation
of a letter he would compose.
Councilmember Muf~oz offered his assistance to Mr. Hasson.
Jo Moulton, 41393 Avenida de la Reina, representing the Temecula Valley Film Council,
reported on the benefits to the community from this kind of film production.
Marvin Zeldin, 28659 Front Street, said the Old Town Main Street Association unanimously
endorsed the filming project.
R.-V,qb~eeeYM. Jtl~
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Roberrs to approve staff
recommendation as follows:
16.1
Authorize the closure of Main Street from Front Street to the westerly edge of the Main
Street Bridge May 2, 1995 for film-making purposes.
16.2
The motion was carried by the following vote:
Direct the Department of Public Works to issue a Special Event Permit for that purpose.
AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Lindemans, Mu~oz, Parks, Roberts
NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSTAIN: I COUNCILMEMBERS: Stone
Councilmember Parks requested that Council instruct staff to prepare an ordinance that' would
allow staff in an administrative level to approve this type of event in the future.
The request was approved by Council consensus.
17
Temecula Sister City Association
Human Resources Administrator Grant Yates presented the staff report.
Mayor Stone questioned staff if it is the goal of the Council to limit the number of Sister Cities
to two?
Administrator Yates responded that staff is not asking for direction as far as limiting the
number of cities; staff is trying to provide a framework of the benefits, goals and objectives
of the program.
Mayor Stone reiterated that he feels this is something the Council should address; how many
Sister Cities does Council want to patronize.
Councilmember Parks explained that the Temecula Sister City Association is a separate entity
from the City; the City participates in this association but its financial exposure is limited. He
explained that money is spent for providing gifts and travel expenses of Councilmembers to
a Sister City. He asked if a staff member is assigned to that association and questioned the
cost.
City Manager Bradley responded that his office handles liaison with the Sister City Committee,
but it is primarily handled through Councilmembers Mu~oz and Roberts. He continued that
limited staff time is expended on this project.
In answer to a question from Mayor Stone regarding the budget allocation last year,
Administrator Yates answered ~5,800 and the previous year it was $4,700.
Mayor Pro Tam Lindemans reiterated the responsibilities of a sister city; this program is
cultural, human and makes America "tick".
RECESS
Mayor Stone called a recess at 7:56 PM to change the tape. The meeting was reconvened at 7:57
PM. -'
City Manager Bradley explained that limiting the number of cities that the City participates
with is very appropriate. He will be meeting with the Mayor of Carcassone, France on May
24 in his office, at no cost to the City, but if Council desires not to continue discussions with
that City, he will cancel the appointment.
There was concensus of Council to proceed with Carcassone, France.
Mayor Stone directed the report be received and filed.
RECESS
Mayor Stone called a recess at 8:00 PM. The meeting was reconvened at 8:10 PM.
18
Community Services Fundina Reauest
(Continued from the meeting of 411 1 ~95)
Assistant City Manager Mary Jane McLarney presented the staff report.
Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans explained that he has met with Ms. Minkler of the Southwest
County Child Care Council, at which time he asked if she could add one more item to their
statement of purpose, that being they make a special effort for children whose parents simply
cannot afford child care. He recommended increasing the amount to be granted by the City.
Martha Minkler, representing the Southwest County Child Care Council, asked Council if they
had any questions with regard to the allocation. She stated Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans'
request is on the agenda for their Executive Board Meeting to be held tomorrow morning; the
planned use for the money is to conduct a needs assessment to determine how many children
are in need of child care in the area and how to best serve them. She said researching a
scholarship program where they can assist children without the means for affordable child care
is definitely within the scope of their mission. She thanked Council for their consideration.
Councilmember Parks reiterated that this is a very worthwhile cause; he would like to know
what is happening in our own community; he questioned the committee'slid of $1,000, and
stated he would be open to increase that amount.
It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans to grant $5,000, as requested, for child care
services.
Mayor Stone stated that part of their criteria was to develop an assessments needs and part
of the pamphlet that will be created will help parents by giving them the tools to select propar
child care providers. He explained that the committee thought this may duplicate information
available through the Chamber of Commerce or the County. He continued that the City will
be going through another round of community service funding in July, and if the City's
allocations remain status quo, the City will have an extra $20,000. He asked to see some of
the goals and criteria the organization is going to use, how they assess financial need and how
those resources are going to be allocated. He noted he does not want to fund this aspect of
the program at this time.
Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans' motion died for the lack of a second.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans, to allocate
$2,500 for child care services to the Riverside County Child Care Consortium, and to request
that this organization provide additional information as requested by Mayor Pro:Tem
Lindemans. The motion was unanimously carried.
DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS
None given.
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
None given.
CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT
None given.
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans to adjourn at 8:58
PM. The motion was unanimously carried with Councilmember Mufioz absent. Councilmember
Mufioz was excused from the meeting at 8:47 PM.
R:ilinuueiNilN -12-
The next meeting of the Temecula City Council will be held on Tuesday, May 9, 1995, 7:00 PM,
Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California.
Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor
ATTEST: '
June S. Greek, City Clerk
ITEM 3
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA ALIa)WING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND
DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE C1TY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE,
DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A have been
audited by the City Manager, and that the same are hereby allowed in the mount of
$822,890.52.
Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution.
APPROVEI) AND ADOFII~, this 9th day of May, 1995.
ATTEST:
Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk, CMC
Resos el
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA)
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby do certify that the
foregoing Resolution No. 95- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the
City of Temecula on the 9th day of May, 1995 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS: None
NOES: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS: None
COUNC~ERS: None
June S. Greek, City Clerk, CMC
Reeoe 61
CITY OF TEMECULA
LIST OF DEMANDS
04/20/95 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
04/27/95 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
05/09/95 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
04120/95 TOTAL PAYROLI~
TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 05109/95 COUNCIL MEETING:
DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND:
CHECKS:
001 GENERAL
100 GAS TAX
120 DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FUND
140 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT
165 RDA-LOWIMOD
190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ (CIP)
220 MARGARITA ROAD REIMB. DIST.
250 CAPITAL PROJECTS - TCSD
280 RDA-CIP
300 INSURANCE
310 VEHICLES
320 INFORMATIONS SYSTEMS
330 SUPPORT SERVICES
340 FACILITIES
380 RDA-DEBT SERVICE
390 TCSD DEBT SERVICE
PAYROLL:
001 GENERAL
100 GAS TAX
165 RDA-LOW/MOD
190 TCSD
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
280 RDA-CIP
300 INSURANCE
320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS
330 SUPPORT SERVICES
340 FACILITIES
,, ~~= ~~--
RONALD F_ BRADLEY, CITY MANAGER
$ 80,508.34
125,861.04
503,395.56
113, 125.58
$ 822,890.52
262,733.25
33,485.51
0.00
0.00
257.61
54,298.99
3,454.15
471.42
32,409.42
0.00
153,386.38
0.00
0.08
119,508.53
37021
0.00
7,724.30
2,~98o80
13,211.07
0.00
0.00
$ 708,754.94
69,380.62
13,518.97
438.70
21,374.25
472.33
620.26
1,338.63
1,365.94
240.21
1,224.73
660.72
1,081.22
113,125.58
822,890.52
· HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
VOUCHRE2
0,~/20/~5
12:17
CITY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE 7
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
100 GAS TAX FUND
165 RDA DEV- L(:N/MOD SET ASXDE
190 COMHIJNXTY SERVICES DISTRICT
191 TCSO SERVICE LEVEL A
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
210 CAPXTAL/NPROVEHENT PROJ FUND
280 REDEVELOPHENT AGENCY -
]00 iNSURANCE FUND
320 ]NFORHATION SYSTEHS
330 SUPPORT SERVICES
340 FACILITIES
TOTAL
AICUNT
35,/~8./~
13,340.03
142.82
11,713.72
1,583.95
278.28
982.40
74.91
4,013.94
2,~80.75
761.86
80,508.34
VOUCHRE2
t"""" '95
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUNBER
23214
425307
425307
425307
425307
425307
425307
425307
~25307
425307
~25307
~25307
425307
/*25307
/*91311
/*91311
/*91311
J,e'q11
1
.11
691311
/*91311
/*91311
/*91311
/*91311
/*91311
/*91311
/*91311
/,91:311
/,91:311
691~11
~91~11
/*91311
/*91311
/*91311
/*91311
/*91311
/*91311
23218
23219
23220
/232.21
12:17
CHECK
DATE
04118195
04/20/95
04120195
0/*/20/95
04/20/95
04/20/95
04/20/95
04/20/95
04/20/95
04120195
04120195
04/20/95
04/20/95
04120195
0/,/20/95
04120195
04/20/95
04/20/95
04/20/95
04/20/95
04/20/95
04/20/95
04/20/95
04/20/95
04/20/95
04/20/95
04120195
04/20/95
04/20/95
04120195
04/20/95
04120195
04/20/95
04/20/95
04120195
04120195
04120195
04/20/95
0/*120195
04/20/95
04/20/95
04/20/95
04/20/95
04120195
VENDOR
NUNBER
001~5
00~444
000~4
00~44
00044~
000/~-44
O004z~
000444
000664
000466
000444
0006/,6
000664
000644
000464
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
00028]
000283
00028~
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
00028~
000283
000283
001910
000781
VENDOR
NAHE
ASSISTANCE LEAGIJE OF TE
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (El)D)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (El)D)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS}
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX ([RS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
ACKERNAN, RALPH
NqERITECH CONleJNICATION
ASHLEY, TON)
ASSDC OF ENVIRONNENTAL
CITY OF TENEOULA
V(XJCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIOOS
ITEN
DESCRIPTION
CAROUSEL OF CARING:R. ROBERTS
O00~A~ SO I
0004~; SD I
000/~4 Si)]
0004~ STATE
0004~ STATE
0004~ STATE
O00z~ STATE
~ STATE
O00/*M, STATE
000/.4~ STATE
000642, STATE
000644 STATE
O00/:,~t:, STATE
000~ STATE
000~4 STATE
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
00028] FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000285 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 MEDICARE
00028~ MEDICARE
000283 HEDICARE
000283 NEDICARE
000283 NEDICARE
000283 HEDICARE
000283 NEDICARE
000283 NEDIrA, RE
000283 NEDICARE
000283 NEDICARE
000283 HEDICARE
00028~ NEDIF. ARE
REFUND FOR FORFEIT FEES
RICOH COPIER YRLY !(A]NT CONTRA
FORFEIT FEE REFIJI/DED
NEHBERSHIP FOR DAVID HOGAN
ACCOUNT
NtJNBER
001-100-999-5260
001-2070
100-2070
190-2070
001-2070
100-2070
165-2070
190-2070
191-2070
193-2070
280-2070
300-2070
320-2070
:550-2070
:54,0-2070
001-2070
100-2070
165-2070
190-2070
191-2070
192-2070
193-2070
280-2070
300-2070
320-2070
330-2070
3~0-2070
001-2070
100-2070
165-2070
190-2070
191-2070
192-2070
193-2070
280-2070
300-2070
320-2070
530-2070
:54.0-2070
190-183-999-5380
3]0-199-999-5217
190-183-999-5380
001-161-999-527.6
ZTEH
AHOUNT
100.00
29.28
6.00
58.52
2,829.57
571.69
10.77
551.50
16.76
8.91
/,5.86
35 °90
5,83
87.75
18.96
1) .64
10,/,14.42
2,177.53
2,636.92
/*9 ./,0
70.68
213.80
18.50
105.95
118./,6
2,517.87
1/, ,/.4
760.47
17.70
64.10
7.93
57.96
64 .S2
1,845.92
/*0.00
80.00
PAGE 1
CHECK:
ANOUNT
100.00
/*,290.92
20,/,32.65
40.00
1,84.5.92
40.00
80.00
VOUCHRE2
(:)4./20/95 12:17
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR
NUIeER DATE Nt.qqBER
23222 04/20/95 000122
23222 04/20/95 000122
23222 04/20/95 000122
23223 04/20/95 000622
2322A 04/20/95
23225 04/20/95 000154.
2.3226 04/20195 000127
23226 04/20/95 000127
23227 04/20/95 001195
23228 04/20/95 001723
23229 04/20/95 000137
23229 04/20/95 000137
23229 C)~/20/95 000137
232~0 04./20/95 00124.7
23231 04/20/95
23232 04/20/95
23233 04/20/95
23Z.~, 04/20/95
23235 04/20/95
23236 04/20/95
23237 04/20/95
23237 04/20/95
23238 04/20/95 001165
23239 04/20/95
2324.0 04/20/95 001701
04/20/95 000165
04/20/95 000165
04/20/95 000165
04/20/95 000165
04/20/95 001002
CITY OF TEHBCULA
VOUCHERICHEC[ REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VENDOR
IdAHE
B S N SPORTS
B S N SPORTS
B S N SPORTS
BANTA ELECTRIC-REFRIGER
BETANCOURT, KIN
CSNFO
CALIFORNIAN, INC. 'LEGA
CALIFORNIAN, INC. -LEGA
CENTRAL SECURITY SERVIC
CHACON, DAVID
CHEVRON U S A ]NC.
CHEVRON U S A INC.
CHEVRON U S A INC.
001208
001535 CREEKSIDE TEXACO, iNC.
001915 CRESTE VERDE ESCRCYJ
001716 DANES ROOFING
001922 DILLOR TELEPHONE CONPAN
001(~9 DUNN EDHARDS CORPORATIO
001669 DUNN EDt,/ARDS CORPORAT]O
ITEH
DESCRIPTION
PRO DOVN FIRST AID KIT
TAX
FREIGHT
REPLACE HUHflING CONTACTOR
SECURITY DEPOSIT REFUND
CONF:95 LEGISLATIVE:G.RO6ERTS
PUBLIC NOTICES (7771989wCI)
PUBLIC NOTICES (777198~"C])
ENERG ALARH SERVICE t CRC
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
ACCOUNT
NI.14BER
1~0-183-~9~-5310
190-183-999-5310
1~0-18~-~-5'310
)~,0-199-999-5212
190-2900
001-14.0-999-5258
001-120-999-5256
001-161-999-5256
190-182-~.~9-5250
190-18:5-999-5330
FUEL EXPENSE FOR CITY VEHICLES OO1-170-999-5262
FUEL EXPENSE FOR CiTY VEHICLES 001-162-~-5263
FUEL EXPENSE FOR CITY VEHICLES 001-161-~99-52~2
CITY-VIDE ELECTRONIC SY FIRE ALARN SYS REPAIR t SR CNT
CLAREHONT, CITY OF pUB:CLAREHONTtS YOUTH RASTER P
CRAFTSHEN PLUMBING HEAT HODULAR UNITS i INTERIN $TATIO
VEHICLE HAINT. PUBLIC VORKS
PER AGHNT WOOOL:ESCRO, J DEPOSI
REPAIR LEAKING ROOF i SR CNTR
APRIL & HAY PAYPHONE SERVS
RECYCLED GRAFFITI PAINT
TAX
FUND RAISER FOR TEENS
REFUND FOR FORFEIT FEES
SKIPLOADER RENTAL
EXPRESS HAIL SERVICES
EXPRESS HAIL SERVICES
EXPRESS HAIL SERVICES
EXPRESS HAIL SERVICES
547'~ "" 0391 0180 KL (GAS)
ENTERTAINMENT PUBLICATI
ERNIE B'S ~I3RLDtS GREAT
EXCEL RENTAL CENTER
FEDERAL EXPRESS, iNC.
FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC.
FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC.
FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC.
FIRST INTERSTATE BANK C
190 - 181 - 999-5250
190-180-999-5228
001 - 171-999- 54.70
100-164-604-5214.
280 - 1652
190-181-999-5212
320-199-999-5208
100-16~-601-5218
100-164-601-5218
190-18~-999-5320
190-183-999-5380
100-164-601-52:58
001 - 1~.0-999-5230
100-164-604-5230
001 - 120 -999- 5230
280-199-999-5230
001-1170
ITSH
ANOUNT
198.00
15.35
21.~
120.39:
100.00
119.64
~.3o
127.38
156.00
1~.~
27.97
11.95
200.00
10.00
700.00
54.2.98
1,000.00
4.00.00
1~..00
60.00
6,~
19.50
23.00
19.00
PAGE 2
AHOUNT
235 · 13
120.39
100.00
152.9A
127.38
156.00
162.60
700.00
542.98
1,000.00
185.00
50.59
1/,/, .00
138.60
da.25
VOUCHRE2
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
23263
232/,4,
23265
23266
23266
23266
23Z68
23269
232/*9
0
2325 '1
23252
23252
23253
23253
23256
23255
23256
23256
23257
23258
23259
23259
23259
23259
12:17
CHECK
DATE
04/20/95
04,/20/95
0/,/20/95
04/20/95
04,/20/95
06/20/95
06/20/95
04120195
04120195
04/20/95
04/20/95
04/20/95
04120195
04/20/95
04120195
04120195
04/20/95
04/20/95
04/20/95
04/20/95
04/20/95
04120195
04/20/95
04120195
04/20/95
04120195
04120195
04120195
04/20/95
04/20/95
04120195
04/20/95
04120195
04/20/95
04/20/95
VENDOR VENDOR
NUMBER NAME
000170 FRANKLIN OUEST C014PANY,
000184. G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYN
GILCHRIST, Ji14
000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GONZALEZ, JOHNNY
001609 GREATER ALAR14 COl4PANY,
000104 I C 14 A RETIREHENT TRUS
000104 I C 14 A RETIREMENT TRUS
00019/* I C 14 A RETIREHENT TRUS
00019/* I C t4 A RETIREHENT TRUS
00019/* I C 14 A RETIREHENT TRUS
000196 I C 14 A RETIREHENT TRUS
000196 [ C 14 A RETIREHENT TRUS
001629 INACOH ]NFORHATION SYST
JOHNSTON, HOLLY
000206 KINKO'S OF RIVERSIDE, I
000206 KINKO'S OF RIVERSIDE, I
000209 L & 14 FERTILIZER, INC.
000209 L & 14 FERTILIZER, INC.
000965 L P S COMPUTER SERVICE
001865 N C I TELECOle4UNICATION
000396 HA]NTENANCE SUPERINTEND
000396 MAINTENANCE SUPERINTEND
001162 PARKHAN & ASSOCIATES
000220 HAURICE PRINTERS, INC.
000883 HONTELEONE EXCAVATING
000883 NONTELEONE EXCAVATING
000883. HONTELEONE EXCAVATING
000883 140NTELEONE EXCAVATING
000883 HONTELEONE EXCAVATING
000883 140NTELEONE EXCAVATING
000883 HONTELEONE EXCAVATING
000883 HONTELEONE EXCAVATING
CITY OF TEI4ECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEH
DESCRIPTION
FRANIO..IN CALENDARS FOR 9A-95
909 699-8632 GEM
REFUND FOR TC$O CLASS
OFFICE SUPPLIES
141SC OFF/CE $UPPL]ES
141SC OFfiCE SUPPLIES
REFUND FOR FORFEIT FEES
PAY ALAR14 IIONITOR]NG-STORAGE
000104 DEF COMP
00019/, DEF CClIP
000196 DEF CONP
000104 DEF CaMP
00019/, DEF CORP
000196 DEF C014P
000196 DEF COMP
SOFTMARE: THE PRINT SHOP
REFUND FOR TCSD CLASS
2 COPIES OF lIESTERN BY PASS
PRINTING AND PAPER NEEDS
14ISC SUPPLIES FOR PRK PAINT
SHARPENING PAINT TOOLS
CALL OUT SERVS POLICE DEPT
LONG DISTANCE SERVS
HEI4BERSHIP:J.KICAK & B.BURON
14EleiERSHIP:J.KICAIC & B.BURUN
PAR 95 PROF GERVS-CALLE BYPASS
NEIGHBORHOOD iTCH NEVSLETTER
RAIN DAMAGE REPAIR MIK-KEARNEY
RAIN DAMAGE REPAIR IItK-KEARNEY
RAIN DAMAGE REPAIR iitK-DEL RAY
RAIN DAIMGE REPAIR MRK-$OLANA
RAIN DAleAGE REPAIR MRK-DIAZ RD
RAIN DAMAGE REPAIR MtK-RANCHO
RAIN DAHAGE REPAIR ON RANCHO V
RAIN DAMAGE REPAIR I~RIC-DEL RIO
ACCOUNT
NLI4BER
001-161-f99-5220
320-1~9-~9-5208
190-18~-4992
001-162-999-5220
001-162-999-5220
: 001-160-f99-5220
lf0-183-~-5380
540-199-999-5230
001-2080
100-2080
190-2080
191-2080
192-2080
lf3-2080
34,0-2080
320-199-999-5~1
190-183-/.982
100-1(~.-60~-5250
190-180-~-5222
lf0-180-999-5262
100-1~4-&01-5218
320-1~-~-5215
320-199-999-5208
100-16~-601-5Z26
100-164-60&.-5226
100-1(~.-60~-5268
001-170-~-5222
IO0-1&A-&01-5/*02
100-1(~-601-5602
100-1(~.-601-5/,02
100-16~-601-5/*02
100-1(~4-601-5602
100-16/*-601
100-166-601 - 5/*02
100-16/*-601-5402
ITE14
MIOUNT
119.55
40.00
21
129.89
25.80
/*0.00
35.00
988.07
222.02
675.98
65.51
75.00
80.06
?.2.50
90.13
35.00
35 .~6
32.16
289.~
10.00
1,3Z0.92
10.00
30.00
170.00
~80.00
3O7.75
631.00
307.75
2/,6.50
965.50
677.50
PAGE 3
'. CHECK
ANOUNT
119,55
27.60
/*0.00
176.92
/*0.00
35.00
1,f29.1/*
f0.13
35.00
67.~2
VOUCHRE2
061201~5
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUHBER
23259
23259
23259
23259
23259
25260
23261
23262
23262
23262
23262
23262
23262
23262
23262
23262
23262
23262
23262
23262
23262
23262
23262
23262
23262
23262
23262
23262
23262
23262
23262
23262
23263
23263
23263
23263
23263
23263
23263
23263
23263
23263
23263
23263
23263
12:17
CHECK
DATE
04120195
04120195
04/20/95
04/20/95
04/20/95
04/20/95
04/20/95
04/20/95
04/20/95
04/20/95
04/20/95
04120195
04/20/95
04120195
04/20/95
04120195
04/20/95
04/20/95
04/20/95
04120195
04/20/95
04/20/95
04/20/95
04120195
04/20/95
04/20/95
04/20/95
04120195
04120195
04120195
04120195
04/20/95
04/20/95
04/20/95
04/20/95
04/20/95
04/20/95
04/20/95
04/20/95
04120195
04120195
04/20/95
04120195
04120195
04/20/95
VENDOR
NUMBER
000883
000883
000883
00088~
000883
000266
000246
00024.6
000246
000246
000266
000246
000246
000246
000266
000246
000246
000266
000246
000246
000246
0002~6
000266
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000246
000269
000269
000249
0002~9
000249
000249
000249
000269
000269
000249
000269
000269
000269
CITY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VENDOR
NAME
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
NONTELEONE EXCAVATING
le3MTELEONE EXCAVATING
MORTELEORE EXCAVATING
NOIITELEORE EXCAVATING
MOt/TELEORE EXCAVATING
RAIN DAMAGE REPAIR WtK-PALA RD
RAIN DAMAGE REPAIR VRK-CALLE C
RA[N DAMAGE REPAIR IdRK-MARGARI
RAIN DAMAGE REPAIR URK-LA PAZ
RAIN DAMAGE REPAIR I/UC-PAUBA R
NAPA CO. RESOURCE-CONSE k'KSHP:SANTA MARG RIVER:J.NETER
PACIFIC AERICAN OULTUR SECURITY DEPOSIT REFUND
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PER REDE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS PET
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PER$ RE1'
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PEMS RET
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET
PERS (EMPLOYEES' PETIRE 000246 PERS PET
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS PET
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS PET
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVO~
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVO~
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SIJRVIVOR
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH REIMB.
PETTY CASH REIMB.
PETTY CASH REIMB.
PETTY CASH REIMB.
PETTY CASH REIMB.
PETTY CASH REIMB.
PETTY CASH REIMB.
PETTY CASH PEIMB.
PETTY CASH REIlI.
PETTY CASH REIMB.
PETTY CASH PEIII.
PETTY CASH REIMB.
PETTY CASH REIHO.
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
100-166 -601-5402
100-164-601-5402
100-164-601-5602
100-164-601-5602
100-164-601-5402
001-161-999-5238
190-2900
001-2130
001-2300
100-2300
165-2390
190-2300
191-2300
192-2390
193-2390
300-2390
320-2300
330-2390
:~0-2300
001-2390
1 O0- 2390
165-2390
191-2300
280-2390
300-2300
320-2300
330-239O
3z,0-2300
001 - 199-4070
001-100-999-5260
190-183-999-5330
001-140-999-5260
001-110-999-5260
320-199-999-5260
001 - 110-999-5258
190-180-999-5222
001-162-999-5230
190-180-999-5260
190-180-999-5220
001-100-999-5260
190-180-999-5220
ITEM
AMOUNT
869.50
369.00
592.25
215.50
254.75
50.00
100.00
43.06
12,360.99
2,310.21
76.46
2,796o4~
89.91
319.65
239.71
37.62
268.21
301.05
55.69
10.22
.23
13.4~
.42
1.~
.i'9
.23
.93
.93
9,00
10.00
35.52
32.50
31.09
26.Q0
36.37
60.93
38.76
6.31
7.78
16.16
PAGE
CHECK
M41XIT
6,210.00
50.00
100.00
19,129.51
312.36
23264 04/20/95 000253 POSTMASTER RENEV BULK RATE PERMIT #5 330-199-999-5230 20.00
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
23265
23265
23266
23266
23266
23267
23268
23268
23268
23268
23268
23268
23268
23268
23268
23268
23269
1
,0
23271
23272
23272
23272
2327'3
23273
2327/,
23275
23275
23275
23275
23275
23275
23275
23275
23275
23275
23275
23275
23275
12:17
CHECK
DATE
0/,120195
04120195
04/20/95
04/20/95
04/20/95
04/20/95
04/20/95
04/20/95
04/20/95
04/20/95
04/20/95
04/20/95
04/20/95
04/20/95
04120195
04120195
04/20/95
04120195
04/20/95
04/20/95
04/20/95
04/20/95
04/20/95
04/20/95
04/20/95
04/20/95
04/20/95
04/20/95
04/20/95
04/20/95
04/20/95
04/20/95
04/20/95
04120195
04120195
04/20/95
04/20/95
04/20/95
04120195
04120195
04120195
VENDOR
NUMBER
00094,7
000947
000262
000262
000262
000426
001412
001412
001612
001612
001412
001412
001412
001412
001412
001612
001046
000353
000353
00043A
000645
0006~5
000645
OOO537
000537
001212
000375
000375
00O375
000375
000375
000375
OOO375
00O375
000311
00O375
0O0375
000311
00O375
000311
00O375
NANE
RAMClIO BELL BLUEPRINT C
RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C
RANCHO CALIFORNIA MATER
RANCHO CALIFORNIA MATER
RANCHO CALIFORNIA MATER
RANCHO INDUSTRIAL $UPPL
RECREGNICS, INC.
RECREONICS, ]NC.
RECREON]CS, INC.
RECREON]CS, INC.
RECREONICS, INC.
RECREON]CS, ]NC.
RECREON]CS, INC.
RECREON]CS, INC.
RECREONICS, INC.
RECREONIC$, INC.
REXOR, FREEDMAN, KLEPET
RIVERSIDE co. AtJDITOR
RIVERSIDE CO. AUDITOR
SIERRA COMPUTER SYSTEMS
IT & FINAL, INC.
SMART & FINAL, INC.
IT & FINAL, INC.
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON -
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON -
SOUTHERN CALIF GAS COMP
SllJTHERH CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHOR
,SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPI~)N
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHOR
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHOR
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHOR
CITY OF TEIECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTIOR
BLUEPRINT REPR00UCTIOR
BLUEPRINT REPRCOUCTIOR
MATER SUPPLIER 2/23-3/23/95
MATER SUPPLIER 2/23-3/23/95
MATER SUPPLIER 2/23-3/23/95
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
PUBLIC POOL RULES-SIGN
CPR SIGN FOR POOL
NO DIVING SIGN FOR POOLS
AUTHORIZED PERSONNEL SIGN
EHERGENCY IlLleERS
PLEASE SHMR SIGN
SHIM POOL CLOSE) SIGN
NO FOOD-BEVERAGE SIGN
GATE CLOSED SIGN
FREIGHT
MAR 95 PROF LEGAL $ERVS
MAR 95 PRKING CITATIOR ASSESS
HAR 95 PRKING CITATIOR ASSESS
SIERRA PROGIMJNING/ASSISTANCE
RECREATIOR $tJPPLIES
RECREATIOR SUPPLIES
RECREATIOR SUPPLIES
ELECT. SERVICE ENDING 04/04/95
59-77-416-2147-0103/16-04/11/
07-8274-036-1451-3 SR CNTR
909 202-4769 JS
909 202-6204 KL
909 202-4762 RP
909 202-6758 RR
909 202-4761SM
909 ~-407'0 MJM
909202-6770RN
909 202-6117 JG
909 205-7826GE
909 202-4767 GT
909 202-6759 TE
909 202-6765 DB
909 206-O992 BH
909 202-6112 SN
909 202-4756 KRTN
ACC~JNT
NUMBER
210-190-137-5802
210-190-137-5802
190-180-999-5260
191 - 180-999- 5260
193-180-999-5240
190-181-999-5212
190-180-999-5244
190-180-999-5246
190-180-999-5244
190-180-999-5244
190-180-999-52/,/,
190-180-999-5244
190-180-999-524,4
190-180-999-52/,4
190-180-999-52/,4
190-180-999-5246
001-130-999-5247
001-2260
001-2265
320-199-999-5248
190-181-999-5301
190-182-999-5301
190-180-999-5301
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5260
190-181-999-5240
001-100-999-5208
001-100-999-5208
001-100-999-5208
001-100-999-5208
001-100-999-5208
001-110-999-5208
001-110-999-5208
001-120-999-5208
001-1/,0-999-5208
001 - 161-999-5208
001-162-999-5208
100-16/,-601 - 5208
190-180-999-5208
190-180-999-5208
320-199-999-5208
ITEM
NI3UNT
4~.24
417.64
52.92
32.62
257.69
191.19
39.36
30.62
117.15
54
67.40
23.70
18.96
61.13
39.50
14.73
36.00
375.00
200.00
356.25
133.66
67.66
101.63
1,296.15
15.&0
83.10
38.99
9L78
70.60
156.15
133.20
52.26
91.00
119.24
85.47
38.12
6O.97
58.81
38.12
PAGE 5
Ale/IT
343.23
191.19
627.19
~.~
575.00
356.25
302.75
1,311 ~55
47.03
1,207.25
VOUCHRE2
04/20/95
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NIJHBER
23276
23277
23277
23270
23?.8O
23281
23282
23283
2328~
2~285
23285
23285
23285
23285
23285
23286
2328~
23287
23287
23287
23287
23287
23288
23288
23288
23288
23288
23290
12:17
CHECK
DATE
04./20/95
0~/20/95
04120195
04./20/95
04/,/20/95
04/20/95
04/20/95
04/20/95
04/20/95
04/20/95
04/20/95
04/20/95
04/20/95
04/20/95
04/20/95
04/20/95
04/20/95
04/20/95
04/20/95
04/20/95
04/20/95
04/20/95
04/20/95
04/20/95
04/20/95
04,/20/95
04/20/95
04/20/95
04/20/95
04/20/95
04/20/95
VENDOR
NUMBER
001505
000305
000305
000957
001898
000320
001921
001065
001065
001065
001065
001065
001065
000389
000389
000389
000325
000325
000325
000325
000325
000326
OOO326
000326
00O326
000326
001881
0003~5
VENDOR
NAME
STEFFEN, SUE
TARGET STORE
TARGET STORE
TEMECtJLA VALLEY CONGREA
TEMECULA VALLEY FILM
THOMAS, DEREK
TOPCRAFT ELECTRIC
TCNNE CENTER STATIONERS
TRAMSAMERICA INFORNATIO
U R I S A INLAND EMPIRE
U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C
U S C H/PEBSCO (DEF. C
U S C M/PEBS00 (DEF. C
U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF, C
U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C
U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C
u s c N/PEBSCO COBRA)
U S C N/PEBSCO (OBRA)
U S C N/PEBSCO (08RA)
UNITED MAY OF THE ]NLAN
UNKTED gAY OF THE INLAN
UNITED MAY OF THE INLAN
UNITED UAY OF THE INLAN
UNITED UAY OF THE INLAN
UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE,
UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE,
UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE,
UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE,
UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE,
HATER SAFETY PRODUCTS,
XEROX CORPORATION BILLI
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
TUITION REII~SENENT
CANDY & RASKETS FOR EASTER PRG
CANDY & BASKETS FOR EASTER PRG
SECURITY DEPOSIT REFUND
SPONSORSHIP OF FILM FESTIVAL
REFUND FOR FORFEIT FEES
ADDITION LIGHT FIXTURE:F/RE ST
OFFICE SUPPLIES
MAR 95 HETRORCAN USAGE CHARGE
MEllERSHIP FOR KELLI BEAL
001065 DEF CONP
001065 DEF CONP
001065 DEF CONP
001065 DEF COMP
001065 DEF COHP
001065 DEF CONP
000389 PT RETIR
000389 PT RETIR
000389 PT RETIR
000325
000325
000~25 iN
000323
000325 iN
UNIFOP. HS FOR Pg NAINT CREgS
UNIFORM HAINT FOR TCSD
FLOOR HAT RENTAL i CKTY HALL
FLOOR HAT RENTAL i CRC
FLOOR HAT RENTAL i SR CNTR
STAFF T-SHIRTS XLARGE
TRANSPARENCY-CLEAR
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-150-999-5259
100-183-~-5370
100-183-~-5370
280-199-999-526~
190-185-999-5380
001-171-999-5470
100-164.-604.-5220
320-199-999-5211
001-161-999-5226
001-2080
100-2080
190-2080
~00-2080
320-2080
34.0 - 2080
001-2160
100-2160
190-2160
001-2120
100-2120
165-2120
190-2120
280-2120
100-16~-601-5243
100-180-999-5243
34.0-199-999-5250
190-182-999-5250
190-181-999-5250
190-183-999-5310
330-199-999-5220
ITEM
AMOUNT
189.21
223.57
74..76
100.00
7,500.00
60.00
100.00
62.90
597.50
20.00
1,955
132.23
271.50
5.00
312.50
50.00
219.60
65.00
58.4.5
10.05
.75
17.00
.75
23.50
20.85
:~,.50
38.23
18.90
64.00
165.83
PAGE 6
CHECK
AMOUNT
189.21
298.33
100.00
7,500.00
100.00
62.90
597.50
2O.0O
7O3.60
87.00 ·
135.98
64.00
165.83
TOTAL CHECKS
VO~RE2
15:19
CITY OF TERECULA
VOUCHER/CNECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE 6
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
100 GAS TAX FUND
165 RDA DEV- LIN/H00 SET ASIDE
190 COHNUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
192 TCSD SERViCE LEVEL B
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
210 CAPITAL |NPROVEIIENT PROJ FUND
280 REDEVELOPNENT AGENCY - C[P
300 INSURANCE FUND
320 INFORHATION SYSTEHS
330 SUPPORT SERVICES
3,(,0 FACILITIES
TOTAL
mT
26,118.06
10,094.60
11A.79
13,935.10
129.16
193.14
1,140.06
1,075.82
56,469.39
3~710.36
116.05
1Z,669.Z1
125,861.04,
VOUCHRE2
04/27/95 15: 19
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK:
NUMBER DATE
73291 06121195
23292 06126195
23293 04/27/95
23299 06/27/95
23300 0/.127/95
73301 04127195
?3302 04/27/95
23303 04/27/95
23303 04127/95
?3304 04/27/95
23305 04/27/95
?3305 04/27/95
23305 04/27/95
23305 04/27/95
23305 04/27/95
23306 04127/95
?3307 04/27/95
?3307 04/27/95
?3308 04/27/95
23309 04/27/95
73310 04/27/95
23311 04/27/95
23312 04/27/95
23313 04127/95
2331/* 04/27/95
23315 04127/95
23316 04/27/95
23316 04/27/95
23317 04/27/95
CITY OF TEHECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VENDOR VENDOR
NIJHBER NAME
0019/.0 WHISTLER BREWING CONPAN
000112 AHERICAN PL/INIMG ASSOC
0012/.9 CENTER FOR ORG. EFFECT]
0004~0 AGLCN PHOTOGRAPHY
001/,25 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR CORP.
000102
AHERICAN FENCE CO. OF C
000936 AHERICAN RED CROSS
000101 APPLE ORE, INC.
000101 APPLE ORE, INC.
000781
ASSOC OF ENVIRONMENTAL
000122 B S N SPORTS
000122 B S N SPORTS
000122 B S N SPORTS
000122 B S N SPORTS
000122 B S N SPORTS
001925
001925
000702
000129
00067/*
001627
BEARD, LISA
BLIND PIG BREWING CO.,
BLIND PIG BREWING CO.,
ITEM
DESCRIPTIOR
LOAN AGREEMENT; BLIND PIG
LUNCH TOUR:DORENIGON] VALLEY
CONF:HANAGING ~RK:FRCE:ELHO-WqI
STUDIO PICTURES
LA 6015202040195 TH (CELLULAR)
REPAIR FENCE J SPT PRK
MASK FOR POOL (CPR SAFETY EOU]
TEI4P HELP W/E/,/15 REER
TEHP HELP W/E 02/15 WHITCHER
CEQA 101 VORKSHOP
A.B.S. BACKBOARD iiHITE
RED STRAPS & BUCKLES
HEAD IMI4OBILIZER
FREIGHT
TAX
SECURITY DEPOSIT REFUND
000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE HA
00137/* CALIFORNIA SECRETARY OF
000127 CALIFORNIAN, INC. -LESA
000950 CALIFORNIAN, INC~' DISP
000950 CALIFORNIAN, ]NC.' DISP
001195 CENTRAL SECURITY SERVIC
ACCOUNT
NI. NBER
280-1520
001-161-999-5261
001 - 162-999-5261
001 - 100-999-5250
320-199-999-5208
190-180-999-5212
190-183-9~9-5310
280-199-999-5250
001-1/.0-999-5118
190-180-999-5258
190-183-999-5310
190-103-9~9-5310
190-183-999-5310
190-183-999-5310
190-183-999-5310
190-2900
NDA LOAN AGREERENT W/BLIND PIG 280-1520
RDA LOAN AGREEMENT WBLIND PIG 280-1520
CADDY GRAPHICS ART kiRK: FOR/*TH OF JULY PRGH
CAL REST RENTAL CENTER, PRK HAINT SCISSORLIFT RENTAL
CALIFORNIA CONTRACT CIT 36TH ANNUAL 14LJN CONF:R.RO6ERTS
CALIFORNIA CPA CONF:GOV'T FORUM RAY 17:OAK:LEY
CALIFORN/A CRIRE PREVEN NIg4BERSHIP FOR SANCHEZ & FANEN
X-MRK i NEIGH PRKS -EVA/.171
UCC FILING FOR BLIND PiG
PUBLIC NOTICE (C,~87R)
CONSTRUCTRIOR NOTICES (C3687R)
SPRING FAIR PAID AD
SECURITY & FIRE MONITORING AT
190-180-999-525/*
190-180-999-5238
001 - 100-999-5238
001 - 1/*0-g99-5261
001-170-999-5261
190-180-999-5/.15
280-199-999-5250
001 - 161-999-5256
001-165-999-525/,
190-180-999-525/*
190-182-999-5250
ITEM
AMOUNT
16,/*00.00
72.00
80.00:
32.95
60.~0
326.00
100.00
58.05
60.00
/*00.00
15/*.00
202,90
58.66
100.00
621.99
22,959.55
200,00
108,19
195.00
78.00
50.00
129.75
35.00
145.66
99.30
59.00
PAGE I
CTECIC
AIqOLJNT
16,600.00
72.00
80.00
32.95
60.90
326.00
100.00
212.85
60.00
8'>,
100.00
23,581.5/*
ZO0.O0
108.19
195.00 -
78.00
50.00
129.75
35.00
1/.5.6/*
231.78
~VO~J~RE2
95
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUNBER
23318
23318
23319
23319
23319
23320
23321
23321
23321
23322
23322
23322
23323
23324
..,26
23326
23326
23326
23326
23326
23326
23326
23326
23326
23326
23326
23327
23328
23330
23331
23331
23331
23331
15:19
CHECK
DATE
04127195
04127195
04127195
04127195
04127195
04127195
04127195
04127195
04/27/95
04/27/~5
04127195
04/27/95
04127195
04127195
04127195
04127195
04127195
04127195
04127195
04127195
04/27195
04127195
04127195
04127/95
04127/95
04127195
04127195
04127195
04127195
04127195
04127195
04/27195
04127195
04127195
04127195
VENDOR
t/U~ER
000138
000138
001535
001535
001535
000155
000155
000155
001673
001673
001673-
000453
0OO754
000160
000160
000160
000160
000160
000160
000160
000160
000160
000160
000160
000160
001941
00099~
000172
000184
000184
000184
00018~
CITICORP NORTH N4ERICA
CITICORP NORTH N4ERICA
CREEKSIDE TEXACO, INC.
CREEKSIDE TEXACO, INC.
CREEKSIDE TEXACO, IMC.
CllB SCOUT PACK 301
DAVL[N
DAVLIN
DAVL[N
DIVERSIFIED TENPORARY S
DIVERSIFIED TENPORARY S
DIVERSIFIED TEMPORARY S
ECONOHICS PRESS, INC. T
ELLIOTT OROIJP, THE
ELSINORE UNION HIGH SCH
EHPLOYNENT DEVELOPHENT
EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPRENT
EMPLOYHENT DEVELOPHENT
EMPLOYMENT DEVELCFHENT
EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPI4ENT
EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPHENT
ENPLOYNENT DEVELOPNENT
ENPLOYMENT DEVELOPIENT
ENPLOYNENT DEVELOPtENT
EHPLOYMENT DEVELOPHENT
EMPLOYNENT DEVELOPtENT
EMPLOYMENT DEVELO!:'NENT
EXPLORER POST 88~
FREEDON COFFEE, INC.
GASB
GTE
G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM
G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM
G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM
G T E CALIFORMIA - PAYH
CITY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEH
DESCRIPTION
LEASE PITT FOR TELEPHONE SYSTEH
LEASE NIT FOR TELEPHONE SYSTEH
VEHICLE NAINT ' PUBLIC RORKS
VEHICLE NAINT FOR PUBLIC MOltKS
VEHICLE NAIMT. - PUBLIC gORK$
SECURITY DEPOSIT REFUND
AUDIO TAPING OF COUNCIL MEETIN
PLANNING COllq TAPING 4117/95
PLANNING COIl TAPING 4119195
TEHP HELP WE 3~26 FRITCHEY
TENP HELPWE 6/9195 ROllAll
TEMP HELP UIE 4116 CURINCA
RENEiikL 7/95-6197
LANDSCAPE REVIEU FEES FOR NAR
SECURITY DEPOSIT REFUND
1ST QTR UI PAYMENT
1ST QTR UI PAYRENT
1ST QTR U] PAYHENT
1ST GTR UI PAYMENT
1ST QTR UI PAY!4ENT
1ST QTR UI PAYMENT
1ST QTR UI PAYRENT
1ST GTR UI PAYMENT
1ST QTR UI PAY!4ENT
1ST QTR UI PAYMENT
1ST QTR UI PAYHEHT
1ST QTR UI PAYMENT
C(liF:MEST REGION LAg;POLICE DT
COFFEE SlIPPLIES CITY HALL
GASB DOC, + ACTIOll RPTS (1YR)
SETTLEHENT CLAIH # 95-147
TELEPHONE PAYNENT 181-1123
TELEPHONE PAYRENT; 694-1993
TELEPHONE PAWtENT 695-3564.
TELEPHONE PAYNENT; 699-7~45
ACCOUNT
.U.aER
320-199-999-5391
320-2800
001-163-999-5214
100-164-601-5214
100-164-601-5214
190-183-4990
001-100-999-5230
001 - 161-999-5250
001-161-999-5250
001-161-999-5118
001-161-999-5118
001-161-999-5118
001-162-999-5228
001-161-999-5230
190-2900
001-2350
100-2350
165-2350
190-2350
191-2350
192-2350
193-2350 -
280-2350
300-2350
320-2350
330-2350
540-2350
001-170-999-5235
:340-199-999-5250
001-140-999-5228
300-199-999-5207
320-19~-;-5208
320-1W-;-5208
320-1W-;-5208
320-19f-;-5208
ITEH
Ne0Ut/T
152.69
1,275.08
271.12
120.13
430.68
100.00
801.67
168.02
156.68
288.96
216.72
5O5.68
80.50
623.00
120.00
15,622.21
3,588.61
114.7~
4,398.83
129.16
193.14
~.82
57.60
141.02
116.05
5Za.02
1,000.00
196.68
120.00
154.20
545.13
1,284.01
51.33
54.42
PA~E 2
CHE~
N4CURT
1,427.57
:821.93
100.00
1,118.37
1,011,36
80.50
625.00
120.00
23,621.05
1,000.00
196.68
120.00
156.20
~z,3.32 04127/95 000481 GEOTECHNICAL & ENVIRONH NOV 9~ PROF SERVE-HINDERGARDT 210-190-136-580~ 94.00
12 04127195 001X81 GEOTECHNICAL & ENVIRONH FEB 95 PEOF SERVE-PALA COIl PK 210-190-120-5802 9~,00
VOUCHRE2
04127195
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
23332
23333
23333
23333
23333
23335
2333~
23337
23338
23339
233~0
233~1
233~2
233~2
?,33~3
?.33~5
23345
233~7
233/*7
233~7
23350
15:19
CHECK
DATE
04127195
06/27/95
0412 7 /95
04/27/95
04/27/95
04/27/95
04/27/95
04/27/95
04/27/95
04/27/95
04/27/95
06/27/95
04/27/95
04/27/95
04/27/95
04/27/95
04/27/95
04127/95
04/27/95
04/27/95
04127/95
04/27/95
04/27/95
04/27/95
04/27/95
04/27/95
04/27/95
04/27/95
04/27/95
04127195
04/27/95
04/27/95
04/27/95
VENDOR
NIJNBER
000~81
000177
000177
000177
000177
000177
000178
000178
000175
001359
001908
000663
000663
001934
001186
001896
001896
000820
000820
000886
000206
000206
00153/*
001534,
001891
001891
00021/*
000216
000216
001936
00138/,
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PER ZOOS
VENDOR ITEM
NAME DESCRIPTIOR
GEOTECHNICAL & ENVIRONM FEB 95 PROF SERVS-HINDERGARDT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISC. OFFICE SlIPPLIES; CTY !r~
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES/BLDG & SAFETY
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT NISC OFFICE SUPPLIES
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES
GLENNIES OFFICE PRCOUCT
GOLDEN STATE TP, N)ING CO
GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO
GOLDEN STATE TRN)ING CO
GOVERNHENT FINANCIAL OF
HODSOR, JACK
HUHAN KINETICS R. IBLISHE
IAPMO
IAPMO
INLAND LABEL PRINTING
IRV[N, JOHN
JOHNSOIl FENCE COMPANY
JOHNSON FENCE COleANY
KRW&AS~IATES
KRW&AS~IATES
KHALSA, ATMA KAUR
KINKO'S OF RIVERSIDE,
KINKO'S OF RIVERSIDE,
LA HASTERS OF FINE TRAV
LA HASTERS OF FINE TRAV
LINFIELD SCHOOL
LINFIELD SCHOOL
LUNCH & STUFF CATERING
LUNCH & STUFF CATERING
LUNCH & STUFF CATERING
MARKET FIXTURES IllLIMIT
MEDIEVAL TILES DINNER &
MINUTEMAN PRESS
OFFICE SUPPLIES/BLDG & SAFETY
HP OFFICEJET PRINTER/FAX/COPY
FREIGHT
TAX
SUBSCKIP:NEMSLETTER 6/95-5/96
ANNUAL BOOT ALLOMANCE
RECREAT[UN REFERENCE BOOKS
1996 UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE
TAX
LOAN AGREEMENT WBLIMD PIG
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
INSTALL BIJ!eER POST 8 CRC
CRC POOL GATE REPAIRS
MAP & PLAN CHECK SERVICES FOR
MORKER$ COle FOR APR 95
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
MISC PRINTING & OFFICE SUPPLIE
MISC PRINTING & SUPPLIES
CONF:C~FO LEG UR)ATE:G.RORERT
CONF:CSHFO LEG UFDATE:NJN
SECURITY DEPOSIT REFUND
NAY 95 LEASE PHT FOR INTERIM S
CATERING SERVS FOR IEETINGS
CATERING SERVS FOR IEETINGS
CITY COUNCIL IEETINGS CATERING
LOAN AGREBENT V/BLIND PIG
FIELD TRIP FOR COMM SERVS
NOTICE OF VIOLATION FORHS
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
210-190-136-580/*
001 - 110-999-5220
001-162-999-5220
001 - 1/,0-999-5220
001-1/.0-999-5220
001 - 162-999-5220
001-171-999-5670
001-171-999-5/.70
001 - 171-999-5670
001-110-999-5228
001-163-999-5243
190-180-999-5228
001 - 162-999-5228
001-162-999-5228
280-1520
190-183-999-5330
190-182-999-5212
190-182-999-5212
001-163-999-52/.9
001-1182
190-183-999-5330
001-161-999-5222
190-180-999-5222
001 - 14,0-999-5258
001-110-999-5258
190-2900
001 - 171-999- 5/*70
001 - 160-999-5250
001 - 110-999-5250
001 - 100-999-5260
280-1520
190-183-999-5350
001-162-999-5222
ITEM
AMOUNT
47.00
17.52
18.91
70.50:
99.13
29.09
770.00
8.50
59,67
55.00
95,00
163.76
385.65
29.89
6,672.OD
683.20
650.00
887.00
/.12.50
16.58-
27.19
515.76
169.GO
169.00
600.00
20.00
10.00
1,999.25
2~.~8
PAGE 3
· CHECK
AHOUNT
235.00
235.15
838.17
55.00
95.00
163.76
615.56
1,337.00
397.92
/36.80
5~2.95 .
298.00
660.00
110,00
1,999.25
285 ./.7
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NtJMBER
23350
23351
23352
23352
23352
23352
23353
23356
7.3355
?.3356
~356
2:3357
7.3358
~.~9
?.3359
Z3359
7_3360
23361
7.3362
23363
2336~
Z3365
23366
23367
~369
15:19
CHECK
DATE
04/27/95
04127/95
04127195
04/27/95
04/27/95
04/27/95
04127/95
04127/95
04127/95
04127/95
04/27/95
04127/95
04127/95
04127/95
04127/95
04/2?/95
04/27/95
04127/95
04127/95
04127195
04/27/95
04/27/95
04/27/~5
04/27/95
04/27/95
04/27/95
04/27/95
04/2?/95
04/27/95
04/27/95
04/27/95
04127195
CITY OF TENEOULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VENDOR
liLtfiBER
001384
00088~
000883
00088~
00088
000399
00118~
001663
0002~5
0002~5
000239
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
MINUTEMAN PRESS
TAX
MOBIL, INC.
MONTELEONE EXCAVATING
MOI/TELEOIIE EXCAVATING
MONTELEOIIE EXCAVATING
MONTELEONE EXCAVATING
NUNI MANAGEMENT ASSIST
FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES
BIER REPAIR IIC-PINA COLADA
BIERGENCY REPAIR VORK
EMERG ROAD REPAIRS-RAIN DAMAGE
ENER REPAIR WtK-SAIITIAGO ST.
MEMBERSHIP GRANT YATES
MURRIETA DEVELOPMENT CO EMERGENCY REPAIR; FIRE SYSTEM
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-162-999-5222
100-16~-601-5263
100-164-601-5602
100-166-601-5602
100-1~-~01-5~02
100-166-601-5602
001-150-~;-5226
1~0-182-~-5212
NATIONAL ASSOC. OF PURC STUDY MATERIALS FOR CPH:THORSB OO1-1~0-999-5261
0 C B REPROGRAPHZCS, IN BLUEPRINTS FOR PARKVIEV PRJT
0 C B REPROGRAPHZCS, IN BLUEPRINTS FOR PARICVIE~ PRJT
OLSTEN STAFFING SERVICE TEHP HELP V/E 6/2 GRAGE
MAILING CHARGE FOR MINUTES
PATTERSON, BECIff
RECRUITMENT ADVERTISING
SEASONAL POSITIONS ADVERTISING
DISPLAY ADVERTISING
ROADMAY CONSTRUCTION ADS
000256 PRESS-ENTERPRISE COIlPAN
000236 PRESS-ENTERPRISE COl!PAN
000256 PRESS-ENTERPRiSE COHPAN
000256 PRESS-ENTERPRISE COl!PAN
TCSD LOCKBIITH SERVICES
TCSD LOCKBIITH SERV]CES OPEN
000255 PRO LOCK & KEY
000255 PRO LOCK & KEY
000270 R J M DESION GROUP, INC HAR 95 PROF SERVS-COIZ PRKVIEV
MATER SERVICE 3/1-3/30/95
MATER SERVICE 3/1-3/30/95
MATER SERVICE 3/1-3/30/95
000262
000262
000262
RANCHO CALIFORNIA MATER
RANClIO CALIFORNIA MATER
RANClIO CALIFORNIA MATER
000426 RANCHO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES
000426 RANCHO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL HULTI-FOLD TOMELS;DISPENSER
000678 RIVERSIDE CO. HEALTH SE VECTOR CONTROL-JAN 95-MAR 95
000357 RIVERS[DE CO. TRANSPORT CONF:EROSIN CNTRL:HODSON-HANGU
CC~F:CA EXECUTIVE ACJ4DENY:R.R.
000873 ROBERTS, RONALD H.
001935 ROSE CITY PAPER BOX LOAN AGREEHENT V/BLIND PIG
0006~5 SItART & FINAL, INC. CANDY FOR SPRING EGG HUNT
000~73 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 909 202-6736 KH
000~75 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 909 202-6755 CITY VAN
210-1~O-&2&-5802
210-1~0-626-5802
001-162-~-5118
001-1~-~-5260
001-150-999-5236
lfO- 180-~-5256
001 - 161-999-5256
001 - 165-999-5256
190-180-999-5212
190-180-999-5212
210-190-626-5802
193-180-999-5Z40
190-180-999-5260
193-180-999-5260
~60-199-999-5212
~0-199-999-5212
190-180-999-5250
100-166-60~-5258
001-100-999-5258
280-1520
190-180-999-5301
190-180-999-5208
190-180-999-5208
ITEM
NIOUNT
18.95
2~,.55
1,231.73:
1,617.00
1,478. Z5
1,652.66
60.00
69.20
18.32
22.50
655.63
16.00
259.39
A~9.07
76.00
326.82
800.00
28.37
6~.87
132.31
9~.55
50.00
120.00
56.15
200.96
111.31
39.21
PAGE
CIECK
aT
26.55
5,779.66
60.00
903.69
69.20
40.82
655.63
16.OO
959.63 .
226.86
50.00
120.OO
56.15
9,223.75
2O0.96
150.52
VOUCHRE2
04/27/~5 15: 19
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR
HUHBER DATE NLIIBER
23370 04127195 000521
23371 04/27/95 000700
23372 04/27/95 0003(~
23373 0/*1271~5 000307
23~7/* 0/*/27/~5 000319
2337/* 04/27/95 000319
2337/* 04/27/~5 000319
2337/* 04127195 000319
23375 04/27/95 001898
233?6 04/2?/95 000320
23371' 04/2?/95 000326
23377 0~/27/95 000326
23378 04/2?/95 001:342
23378 04/2?/95 001342
233?9 04/2?/95 001939
23380 04/27/95 001926
23381 04/27/95 00C)~.8
CiTY OF TENEOULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERZOOS
VENDOR
NAHE
STEVART, BRUCE N.
TENEOULA ARTS COUNCIL
TENECULA COPIERS
TENEOULA TROPHY CO.
TOHARK SPORTS, INC.
TOHARK SPORTS, INC.
TOHARK SPORTS, INC.
TONARK SPORTS,, INC.
TOPCRAFT ELECTRIC
iTEM
DESCRIPTION
CONTRACT SERVICE/BRUCE STEIJART
TICKET FOR HAYOR~S BALL:RONERT
TONER FOR FIRE DEPT COPIER
lst-2nd-3rd PLACE ROSETTE
BASEBALL EQUiP-SLIDER BASE
BASEBALL EQUIP-SAF-T-SLIDER BA
FREIGHT
TAX
iNSTALL PHONES i INTERIM STATI
TOllE CENTER STATIONERS MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES P.M.
ONITOG RENTAL SERVICE,
UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE,
WAXZE SANITARY SUPPLY,
WAXZE SANITARY SUPPLY,
WINDSOR PROJECTS, iNC.
YELLON FRE/GHT SYSTEMS,
ZIGLER, OAIL
ON]FORMS ' CLEANED, PRESSED,
ONIFORI4RAINTERANCE FOR TCSD
BLDG NAINT. SUPPLIES ' CRC
BLDG. HAINT. SUPPLIES - CEC
HAR95 RENT-APR 95 CAN
LOAN AGREEMENT W/BLIND PiG
REFRESHHENTS FOR F]RE STATION
TOTAL CHECKS
ACCOUNT
NI. NBER
001-162-f~-57.50
001 - 100-~q~-5260
001-171-999-5215
190-180-~9-5380
190-183-~-5380
190-183-999-5380
190-183-~-5380
190-183-999-5380
001 - 171 -~- 5/,70
100-1~.-604-5220
100-164-601-5243
190-180-~-5243
190-182-999-5212
190-182-~-5212
340-199-~-52:~
280-1520
190-180-9~-5260
ITEM
AHOUNT
125.00
50.00
27.69;
77.00
585.00
65.00
23.58
50.38
875.00
7.47
23.50
20.85
155.11
250.8~
11,/.97.65
345.65
130.00
PAGE 5
CHECK
AHOUNT
125.00
50.00
27.69
77.00
723.96
875. O0
.35
11,4.~. ,,
345.65
130.00
125,861
~V~UCI!RE2
16:09
CITY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
100 GAS TAX FUND
190 COlqHUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
210 CAPITAL INPROVEHENT PROJ FUND
280 REDEVELOPNENT AGENCY -
TOTAL
ANOUNT
221,?.21.75
16,050.88
28,630.17
1,751.0/,
30,286.96
151 ,/,19.68
5/,,035.08
503,395.56
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TENECULA
04/27/95 16:09 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE 1
~..
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEH
NUMBER DATE NUNHER NANE DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT
CHECK
AI~UNT
23385 05/09195 001281 ALHAMBRA GROUP DESIGN SERVICES'NARGARITA PARK 210'190'119'5802 10,545.00
23386 05/09/95 001344 ANERICAN CONTRACTING, I RELEASE OF RETENTION W/H 210'2035 32,049.13
23387 05/09/95 001/,/,5 ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF TE COIe4UNITY SERVICES FUNDING 001'100'999'5267 1,000.00.'
10,545.00
32,Q49.13
1,000.00
23388 05/09/95 001933 ASSOCIATED WINE DISTRIB LOAN AGNEENENT W/BLIND PIG 280-1520 6,321.25
6,321.25
23389 05/09/95 001516 BARTON-ASCleUkN ASSOCIAT TRAFFIC XIqPACT ANALYSIS-OLD TW 280-199-999-5248 560.62
23389 05/09/95 001516 BARTON-ASCHNAN ASSOCIAT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS-OLD T~ 280-1270 560.42
· 1,120.8~
233g0 05/09/95 000123 BURKE WlLLIAMS & SOltENS PAR 95 LEGAL $ERVS-GENERAL 001-130-999-52~6 3,150.00
23390 05/09/95 000123 BURKE UILLI,~S & SOltENS PAR 95 LEGAL SERV$ 001-130-999-52~6 22,563.89
23390 05/09/95 000123 BURKE WILLIAMS & SOREMS FeAR 95 LEGAL SERV$ 190-180-999-52~6 256.00
23390 05/09/95 000123 BURKE WlLLIAMS & SOREMS NAR 95 LEGAL SERVS 300-199-999-5207 2,211.50
23390 05/09/95 000123 BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENS PAR 95 LEGAL SERVS 001-1280 774.39
23390 05/09/95 000123 BURKE UILLIAMS & SOREMS PAR 95 LEGAL SERVS RDA 280-199-~-5246 1,356.93
23390 05/09/95 000123 BURKE glLLIAMS & SOREHS PENDING APPROVAL FRON CLAINS A 300-199-~-5207 2,211.50-
23391 05/09/95 000638 CAL/FONNIA DEPT OF CONS 1ST QTR SIll FEES 001-2280 493.37
23391 05/09/95 000638 CAL/FORN]A DEPT OF COILS 1ST QTR SNI FEES 001-2290 1,832,99
23391 05/09/95 000638 CALIFORNIA DEPT OF CONS 1ST QTR $Nl FEES 001-2290 25.97
23391 05/09/95 000638 CALIFORNIA DEPT OF CONS 1ST QTR SRl FEES 001-162-4229 117.62-
28,101.21
23392 05/0o/95 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE PA MARTINIQUE LANDSCAPE 193'180'999'5416 6,820.70
23392 05/09/95 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE HA TREE TRIN AT WINCHESTER CREEK 193'180'999'5415 6,085.00
23392 05/09/95 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE HA APR LANDSCAPE PAINT t CRC 190-182'999'5415 1,619.00
23392 05/09/95 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE HA APR LANDSCAPE PAINT t NEDIANS 191'180'999'5415 859.94
23392 05/09/95 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE HA APR LANDSCAPE PAINT g NEIGH PR 190-180'99~'5415 12,759.~4
23:392 05/09/95 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE HA APR LANDSCAPE PAINT i SR CNTR 190-181'999'5415 175,00
23392 05/09/95 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE PA FEB & MAR LANDSCAPE I YNEZ RD 191'180'999'5415 769.88
23392 05/09/95 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE HA FEB & MAR LANDSCAPE PAINT i LO 190-180'999'5415 576.82
29,665.78
23393 05/09/95 001929 CONPLEAT UINEffiI, KER, THE LOAN AGREElENT U/BLIND PIG 280-1520 1,2999.58
23393 05/09/95 001929 COIqPLEAT VINENAKER, THE LOAN AGREElENT V/BLIND PIG 280-1520 8,892.10
10,191.68
233~4 05/09/95 001923 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS lIAR 95 PROF SERVS-FIELD INVEST 210-190-626-5802 2,351.39
2,351.39
23395 05/09/95 001932 CROSS DISTRIBUTING CO., LOAN AGREElENT W/BLIND PIG 280-1520 10,464.14
10,/~4.7/,
23396 05/09/95 001920 E P T LANDSCAPE ARCHZTE 6TH STREET PROP. SKETCHES 280-199-999-52~8 1,953.00
23397 05/09/95 001380 E S I ENPLOY!qENT SERVIC TEMP INSPECT HELP W/E 3/31 COX 001-162-999-5230 4,356.00
23398 05109195 000754 ELL]OTT GROUP, THE
FEB 95 LANDSCAPE REVIEW FEES 001-161-999-5250 5,825.00
23399 05/09/95 000164 ESGIL CORPORATION MAR 95 PLAN CHECK SERVS 001-162-999-5248 4,763.8/,
4,763.84
23/,00 05199195 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE APR LANDSCAPE PAINT FOR SLOPES 193-180-999-5~15 17,381.26
234.00 05/09/93 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE APR LANDSCAPE PAINT FOR SPT PR 190-180-999-5415 6,877.81 24,Zr~L,Q7
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUIiER
234.01
2~02
2~02
2~02
2_~03
2~0~
23405
~05
~07
~08
~10
;10
~10
~11
~12
~12
~12
~13
~15
~17
~17
~17
~18
16:09
CHECK
DATE
05/09/~5
05/0~/95
05/09/95
05/0~/95
05/09/95
05109195
05/09/95
05/09/95
05/09/95
05/09/95
05/09/95
05/09/95
05/09/95
05/09/95
05/09/95
05/09/95
05/09/95
05/09/95
05/09/95
05/09/95
05/09/95
05/09/95
05/09/95
05/09/95
05/09/95
05/09/95
05/09/95
05/09/95
05/09/95
05/09/95
05/09/95
05/09/95
05/09/95
05/09/95
VENDOR
NtI4BER
0019'51
0004.81
000481
000481
000551
000175
000./,88
000388
001930
000202
001369
001689
001689
001689
001207
001007
001007
001383
001911
000267
000270
000270
000270
001327
001327
001327
CITY OF TE!4ECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOe ALL PERIODS
VENDOR
NANE
FRENCH VALLEY UINERY
GEOTECHNICAL & ENVIRONN
GEOTECHNICAL & ENVZRONM
GEOTECHNICAL & ENVIROIN
G[LLZSS, NAX C.H.
GOVERNNENT FINANCIAL OF
I C B O, INC.
! C B O, ]NC,
I D D PROCESS & PACKAGI
J F DAVIDSON ASSOCIATES
KANE, BALLNER & BERKNAN
KOLER[CH, THONA$ & LORE
KOLERICH, THONAS & LORE
KOLERZCH, THINAS & LORE
KOLERICH, THOMAS & LORE
ITEH
DESCRIPTIOR
LOAN AGREElENT WBLIND PIG
OCT 96 PEOF SERVS-PALA C014H PIC
OCT 96 PItOF SERVS-PALA CClel PIC
NOV 95 PEOF SERVS-PALA (:(X4 PlC
JAN-NAR 95 CONSULTING SERVS
TUITION FEES 1995 ADVANCE) GOV
1F~. BLDG INSPECTOR NEC BOOKS
TAX
LOAN AGREElINT V/BLIND PiG
kilNCHESTER lID ENGINEER DESIGN
NAR 95 PROF LEGAL SERVS
REFtJ!i-OVRCHG TCSD RATE FYVI-5
REFUND-OVRCHG TCND RATE FY91-5
REFUND-OVRCHG TCSD RATE FY91-5
REFIJND-OVRCHG TCSD RATE FY91-5
HACADEE ELECTRICAL CONS TRAFFIC S]GNAL i HARGARITARD
HACADEE ELECTRICAL CONS TRAFFIC SIGNAL I HARAGAR/TA RD
HACADEE ELECTR]CAL CONS RETENT]OR ki/H )NV 138~
HARTIN J. JASKA, INC. RELEASE STOP NOTICES
140RR]S HURRY GESSOU
HORR]S 141JRRY GESSOU
HORRISNtJRRY GESSOki
NORRIS HURRY GESSOki
REIqJND OF PLANNING FEES
REFt, RI) OF PLANNING FEES
REFUND OF PLANNING FEES
REFUND OF PLANNING FEES
NPG ~P.
NPG ~P.
GRADE SOIL FOR CONCRETE
ADDITIONAL GRADING & RATERIALS
P N ki ASSOCIATES, INC. 2-DAY NGNT DEV I,KSHP CONSULTAN
PALAlIGA RESORT
RETREAT APW!L 13'16, 1995
PESTI4ASTER
R J N DESIGN GROUP, INC
R'J M DESIGN GROUP, INC
R J N DESIGN OROUP, INC
R]GNT-OF-MAY NEED CRTRL PRGN
FEB 95 IqtOF SERV$:PEK'VIEV STAT
NAR 95 PROF SERVS-PRK'VIB4 STAT
PROGRESS Iqrl' FOR AIENIX,i"ENT1
RANClIO RECYCLED PRODUCT
EANCHO RECYCLED PRODUCT
RANClIO RECYCLED PRODUCT
RECYCLED 3 RAIL FENCE AT KENT
LABOR
TAX
ACCOUNT
NUIIER
280-1520
210-1~)-120-5802
21 O- 1~0-120-5802
210-1~0-120-5802
001-110-999-524,8
001-1~0-999-5261
001-162-9~9-5228
001-162-999-5228
280-1520
210-16S-661-5802
280-199-999-52~6
190-180-6005
190-180-999-5375
191-180-999-5375
191-180-6005
210-165-64.2-5806
210-165-642-580A
210-2035
210-20:58
001-161-6119
001-161-6129
001-163-6129
001-163-6388
001-171-~-5670
001 - 171 -~- 5670
001-110-~-5258
001-110-~-5258
100- lt4-~01 -.%02
210-1~0-626-5802
210-1~0-626-5802
210-1~0-138-5802
1~0-180-~-5212
1~)-180-f~-5212
1~0-180-~-5212
ITEH
N4OUNT
1,000.00
2,500.00
5,903.00
2,617./~ '.
9,000.00
1,250.00
1,751.00
1/.~,.60
6,695.76
9,500.00
513.00
1,309.90
31.76
7,316.65
26,330.15
3,366.67-
19,991.25
935.00
570.50
65.00
18,278.82
7,967.18
2,238.80
1,521.77
16,050.88
10,76~.60
1,345.55
16,800.00
2,880.00
1,~.0.00
22:5.20
PAGE 2
10,820.63
9,O0O.00
1,250.00
1,895.40
6,695.76
9,500.00
5,O62.25
30,280.~
19,991.25
1,625.50
26,2/~.00
2,2)8.8O
1,521 .T/
16,050.88
VOUCHRE2
0~127195
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NU!eER
2.,~20
Z~21
2:~22
2T~22
2~22
2~26
Z.~25
Z.~2&
2)627
16:09
CHECK
DATE
05/09/~5
05/09/~5
05109/95
05109195
05109195
0510~1~5
05109195
0510~1~5
05109195
05/09/95
05/09/95
VENDOR VENDOR
NUI4BER NAHE
000267 RIVERSIDE CO. FIRE DEPT
000354 RIVERSIDE IX). HEALTH DE
001675 RIVERSIDE CO./GSA BUILD
001483 TON DOO SON & ASSOCIATES
00148~ TON DODSON & ASSOCIATES
001/,83 TON DODSON & ASSOCIATES
000978 TRAUNA INTERVENTION PRO
001602 TRNJTIiEIN CONSTRUCTION
000332 VANDORPE CHOU ASSOCIAT!
0005)9 kIINHER YN4ADA ASSOCIATE
001927 ZAPATA INDUSTRIES, INC.
CITY OF TENEOULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERZOOS
ZTEN
DESCRIPTION
2ND OTR COST FOR FIRE SERVS
FEB 95 ANINAL CONTROL SERVS
REAL PROPERTY SERVS FOR kIINCHE
ACCOUNT
NU!4BER
001-171-F)~-5251
001-172-;'5Z55
210-165-602-5700
HAR 95 SERVS FOR ENTERTAIN ADV 280-1~-F)~-5268
HAR 95 SERVE FOR ENTERTAIN ADV 280-1270
RETENTION WH INV BU-050-9
3PJ) QTR USER FEES:EHER RESPONS
RELEASE OF RETENTION
HAR 95 PLAN CHECK SERV$
HAR 95 PROF SERVS-PALA CONN PK
LOAN AGREEHENT kI/BLIND PIG
280-2035
001 - 171-999-5274
210 - 2035
001-162-999-524,8
21 O- 190-120-5802
280-1520
TOTAL CHECKS
ITEM
123,205.92
7,007.6/,
1,2.37.20 '.
1,850. O0
1,850.00
370.00'
1,312.50
3,100.00
1,250.39
4,635.00
6,538.63
PAGE 3
AHOUNT
123,205,92
7,007 ·
1,237.20
3,330.00
1,312.50
3,100.00
1,250.39
6,635.00
6,538.63
503,39r/-r~
ITEM 4
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY MANAGER~
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
Genie Roberrs, Finance Officer
May 9, 1995
City Treasurer's Report as of March 31, 1995
PREPARED BY: Tim McDermott, Chief Accountant
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive and file the City Treasurer's Report
as of March 31, 1995.
DISCUSSION: Reports to the City Council regarding the City's investment portfolio and
receipts, disbursements and fund balance are required by Government Code Sections 53646
and 41004 respectively. The City's investment portfolio is in compliance with the Code
Sections as of March 31, 1995.
FISCAL IMPACT: None
ATTACHMENTS: 1. City Treasurer's Report as of March 31, 1995
2. Schedule of Assets, Liabilities, and Fund Equity as of March 31,1995
City of Temecula
City Treasurer's Report
As of March 31, 1995
Cash Activity for the Month of March:
Cash and Investments as of March 1, 1995
Cash Receipts
Cash Disbursemems
Cash and Investments as of March 31, 1995
$ 49,472,458
2,573,391
(3,261,013)
$ 48,784,836
Cash and Investments Portfolio:
Type of Investment
Petty Cash
General Checking
Benefit Demand Deposits
Local Agency Investment Fund
Deferred Compensation Fund
Deferred Compensation Fund
Defined Contribution Fund
Trust Accounts-TCSD COPs
Reserve Account-TCSD COPs
Trust Accounts-RDA Bonds
Construction Fund-RDA Bonds
Reserve Account-RDA Bonds
Institution Yield
City Hall
First Interstate
First Interstate
State Treasurer 5.934 %
ICMA
PEBSCO
PEBSCO
Bank of America 5.850
BofA - Bayerische Landesbank 6.870
Bank of Amedca 5.850
BofA - Bayerische Landasbank 6.210
BofA - Bayerische Landesbank 7.400
Balance
$ 800
(355, 163)
4,820
35, 188,475
263,808
304,488
19,938
181,700
502,690
338,360
10,886,000
1,448,920
$ 48,784,636
(1)
(1)
(1)-This amount is nat of outstanding checks.
Per Govemment Code Requirements, this Treasurer's Report is in compliance with
the City of Temecula's inve~r~ent policy and there are adequate funds available
to meet budgeted and actual expenditures of the City of Temecula for the next
thirty days.
City of Temecula
Schedule of Assets, Liabilities, and Fund Balances
As of March 31, 1995
Assets:
Cash and investments
Receivables
Due from other funds
Land held for resale
Fixed assets-net
Toted assets
Community
Services Redevelopmerit
city (1) Dbt,ct Agency
Total
$ 28,058,8~0 $ 1,872,993 $ 18,852,953 $ 48,764,836
1,988,899 122,300 114,767 2,225,966
587,661 587,661
918,171 2,004,569 2,922,740
494,331 494,331
$ 32,047,952 $ 1,995~93 $ 20,972,280 $ 55,015,594
Ijabilitk,:
Due to other funds
Other liabilities
Total liabilities
$ 554,861 $ 32,800 $
2,686,507 $ 187,076 399,515
3,241,368 187,076 432,415
Fund equity:
Contributed capital 1,030,248
Retained earnings 147,313
Fund balances:
Reserved (2) 2,929,568
Designated (3) 14,585,809
Undesigrmted 10,113,558
Total fund equity 28,806,584
Total liabilities and fund equity
728,413 5,773,128
1,079,804 14,766,746
1,808,217 20,539,874
$ 32,047,952 $ 1,295,293 $ 20,972,268 $
587,661
3,273,198
3,860,859
1,030,246
147,313
9,431,103
30,432,449
10,113,558
51,154,675
55,015,534
(1) Includes General Fund, CIP Fund, Gas Tax Fund, other special revenue funds, and defeffed comp agency funds.
(2) Includes amounts reswved for encumbrances, land hid for resale, long-tern notes receivable, Iowlmod housing,
and debt service.
(3) Includes mounts designated for e~onomic uncertainty, debt service, and continuing appropriations.
ITEM 5
~PPROV~T.~
e[~Z ATTOP, NK"Z
FINANCE OFFiC
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Manager/City Council
Genie Roberta, 'Finance Officer
May 9, 1995
Contract for Audit Services for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1995
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve a one-year extension with Moreland
and Associates to provide audit services for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1995.
DISCUSSION: On May 26, 1992 the City Council authorized the selection of Moreland
and Associates, Certified Public Accountants, over four other audit firms to serve as the City's
auditors under a three-year contract. The current audit contract expires this fiscal year.
Moreland and Associates has extensive municipal experience and is highly respected in the
field of governmental accounting and auditing. They have provided timely and thorough audit
services which has enabled staff to meet its financial reporting deadlines at the state and
national levels. During the past three years, Moreland and Associates has proven to be very
accessible to City staff as needed to provide technical support, as well as to provide
supplemental or special audit services when requested.
Moreland and Associates has currently submitted a proposal to provide audit services for the
next three years. Staff feels that a one-year extension of the existing agreement is in the best
interest of the City, A request for proposal will then be initiated by staff during the coming
year to various local and regional auditing firms for future audit services,
The proposed contract amount (including expenses) is 817,000, which is an approximate 4%
increase over last year's fee.
FISCAL IMPACT: Funds for the proposal have been budgeted in the both the Finance
Department and Redevelopment Agency FY 1994/95 consulting line items, as well as the
proposed FY 1995196 budgets.
Attachment: Moreland and Associates Proposal letter
Moreland
CF, RT1RED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
6~0 NEVePOgrT CI;NTIe~ DRIVg. gUITg; ~J.O
NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92660
(714) 760-9788
2111 PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD, SUITE 150
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92009
(619) 431-8476
February 2, 1998
Ms. Genie Roberrs
Finance Officer
City of Tcmccula
43172 Business Park Road
Tcmccula, CA 92390
Dear Ms. Roberts:
In accordance with your request, we are submitting this letter proposal to extend
our existing agreement for auditing services with the City of Temecula to cover each
of the three years ending June 30, 1997. The scope of work will remain unchanged
with regards to audit services for the City of Tcmccula-
The hourly rates to be used in computing our fees to the City wfll increase
approximately 4% each year resulting in hourly rams for the three years as follows:
L~vel of Work Performed
1995 1996 1997
Partner $123 $128 $133
Manager 99 103 107
Senior Accountant 64 67 70
Assistant Accountant 58 61 63
Qerical 29 30 31
We estimate that our total fees, including out-of-pocket expenses, will be as follows
for each of the three years ending June 30, 1997.
1995 1996 1997
Qty $12,400 $12,900 $13,400
Rcdcvelopment Agency 2,300 2,400 2,500
Single Audit 2.300 2.400 ' 2.500
Total $17.000 $17,700 $18.400
lVls. Genie Roberrs
Finance Officer
City of Temccula
Page 2
We appreciate the opportunity to continue as auditors for the City of Temecula.
We would be pleased to discuss with you at your convenience the contents of this
letter or any other matters you may wish to discuss. Please acknowledge acceptance
of our proposed hourly rates and maximum fees by signing and returning a copy
of this letter for our files
Very truly yours,
MORELAND & ASSOCIATES
Michael C. Moreland, Parmer
MCM:shd
ACCEPTANCE OF HOURLY
RATES AND MAXIMUM FEES:
Date:
ITEM 6
APPROV~ x~(
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFI
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
City Manager/City Council
Genie Roberts, Finance Officer
DATE:
May 9, 1995
SUBJECT:
Extension of Agreement for Banking Services
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve a two-year extension with First
Interstate Bank to provide banking services through June 30, 1997.
DISCUSSION: On February 23, 1993, the City Council, through an RFP process,
authorized the selection of First Interstate Bank (FIB) over five other banks to perform the
City's banking services. During the past year staff informally extended the bank's contract
to allow the bank and staff to resolve open issues regarding the banking services provided
within the contract.
First Interstate Bank (FIB) has been very accommodating during the past year and has worked
to maintain a good working relationship with the City. The staff from First Interstate Bank
was very responsive in addressing issues such as the annual deferral of the City's investment
earnings credit surplus, the offset of the annual credit cards fees and courier service fees
against the investment earnings credit balance, and the setup of a sweep account to allow the
City to earn hard dollar investment earnings on excess available funds in the City's account.
City Staff is recommending a two-year extension of the banking services contract with First
Interstate Bank. Since an effective working relationship has been developed with the bank,
staff feels that the additional costs associated with changing banks is not warranted at this
time.
FISCAL IMPACT: Fees for banking services are off-set against the investment earnings
credit ("interest earned") on the City's checking account balance.
Attachment: Agreement for Banking Services
CITY OF TI~IECULA
AGR~~T FOR BANKING SERVICES
THIS AGI~I~:~MENT, made and entered into May 9, 1995, by and between the CITY
of TEMECULA, a municipal corporation, heteinaft~ rderred to as 'City' and FIRST
INTERSTATE BANK OF CALWORNIA, hereinaft~ referred to as *Bank*.
L
The City is desirous of obtaining the services of Bank to provide certain banking
services to City, and Bank is desirous of providing such services.
SCOPE OF SERVICES
Bank shall provide the services set forth in its original proposal to City dated
December 10, 1992, and said pages of which are for an election to be made by City, the
election shall be made by the City Treasurer of City. The City Treasurer may also elect to
delete any of the services set forth in the attached portion of Exhibit "A" , subject to the
notice requirements contained in the Product Agreements described below. Bank may
provide additional services under the terms of this Agreement upon the mutual agreement of
Bank and City and the approval of the terms and conditions thereof by the City by the City
Council of the City of Temecuh.
COlVIPENSATION
Compensation to Bank for the services provided to this Agreement shall be as set
forth in the pricing pwvisions in the attached Exhibit "A ", said provisions of which are
incorporated herein by this reference. In the event that services not specified in Exhibit "A"
are requested by City, the fees for such services ~nll be negotiated at the time they are
added. The Bank shall reserve the right to pass on direct costs associated with Federal and
State ~gulations, including Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation charges. Revisions to the
compensation hereunder shall be approved by the City Council of the City of Temecula,
subject to Bank's unilateral fight to change its fees each luly, commencing July 1994.
CITY OF ~
AGREEMENT FOR BANKING SERVICES
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into May 9, 1995, by and between the CITY of
TEMECULA, a :municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City" and FIRST INTERSTATE
BANK OF CALIFORNIA, bereinafter referred to as "Bank".
The City is desirous of obtaining the services of Bank to provide cerraln banking services to City,
and Bank is desirous of providing such services.
SCOPE OF SERVICES
Bank shall provide the services set forth in its proposal to City dated December 10, 1992, a copy
of which is attached hereto as Exhibit 'A' and said pages of which are for an election to be made by
City, the election shall be made by the City Treasurer of City. The City Treasurer may also elect to
delete any of the services set forth in the above designated portion of Exhibit 'A* , subject to the notice
requirements contained in the Product Agreements described below. Bank may provide additional
services under the terms of this Agreement upon the mutual agreement of Bank and City and the approval
of the terms and conditions thereof by the City by the City Council of the City of Temecula.
COMPENSATION
Compensation to Bank for the services provided to this Agreemere shah be as set forth in the
pricing provisions in the attached Exhibit *A', and the Bank's letter to the City dated December 22,
1992, a copy of which is attached hueto as Exhibit "B* , said provisions of which are inncorporated herein
by this rderence. In the event that services not specified in Exhibit *A* are requested by City, the fees
for such services shall be negotiated at the time they are added. The Bank shah reserve the right to pass
on direa costs associated with Federal and State regulations, including Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation charges. Revisions to the compensation hereunder shall be approved by the City Council
of the City of Temecula, subject to Bank's unilateral right to change its fees each July, commencing July
1994.
R:IIVOR7'O~LL46EW~ASl~4MI(WV~.A~fV 6/2/96
This .Agreement shall commence on the 9th day of May, 1995 and shall remain and continue in
effect until June 30, 1997. Time is of the essence in the performance of this Agreement.
EXTENSION
Tne term of this Agreement may be extended by City's Treasurer and Bank by agreement in
writing with respect to each such extension at least thirty (30) calendar days prior to the date on which
this Agreement or an extension thereof would otherwise have terminated. The terms and conditions of
the a~reement as so extended shall be as set forth herein except that modifications in the compensation
designated in Section HI (Exh~it 'A "), may be made effective for the period of any extension as mutually
determined by Bs_nk and the Treasurer of City in writing as a pan of the agreement for the extension of'
this Agreement, subject to the approval of the City Council of City.
This Agreement extends the current terms under a~reement by and between City and Bank
effective May 9, 1995 through June 30, 1997.
TERMINATION
Any other provision herein to the contrary notwithstanding, and in addition to other methods of
termination provided for herein or available under the laws of the State of California, it is agreed that
this Agreement shall terminate ninety (90) days after written notice of termination, which may be given
by either party to the other party to this Agreement with or without cause. After the expiration of such
ninety {90) day period, Bank shall immediately cease all services hereunder except as may be specifically
approved by the City. Bank shall be entitled to compensation for all services rendered prior to the
terminstion and for any services authorized by City thereafter in accordance with the aforementioned
section regarding compensation.
NOTICES
Any notice required to be given hereunder shall be in writing with copies as directed herein and
shall be personally served or given by mall. All notices by mail shall be deemed to have been given
when received by the party to be served. Mail notices are to be sent by United States mall, certified and
postage prepaid, addressed to the party to the be served as follows:
FL. WOR TON L ~4 G ENDA SIBANKING. A GN 5/2/95
TO CITY:
City of Temecula
Genie Robins, Finance Officer
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
TO BANK:
First Intentate Bank
Larry Jacobson, Vice President & Manager
Temecula Office
26411 Ynez Road
Temecula, CA 92591
AND
First Interstate Bank
Susan M. Cotton, Vice President & Manager
Government Services Group
5000 Birch Street, Suite I0,000
Newport Beach, CA 92660
Either party may change its address by notifying the other party of the change of address in
writing. Notice shall be deemed communicated when received by the party to be served if served as
provided in this section.
ATll)RNEY'S FEES
In the event that either party hereto fails to comply with any of the terms of this Agreement and
the other party commences legal proceedings to enforce any of the tenm of this Agreement or to
terminate this Agreement, the prevailing party in such suit shall receive from the other a reasonable sum
including atWmey's fees and costs as may be established by the Court or Jury.
ASSIGNMENT; SUBCONTRACTS
The experience, knowledge, capability and reputation of Bank, its principals sea employees were
a substantial inducement for City to enter into this Agreement. Therefore, Bank shall not subco~i~act,
assign or otherwise transfer its rights and obligations under this Agreemere without prior written consent
of City. Any such subcontractor or assignment without such consent shall be void and shall, at the option
of City, teminate this Agreement. It is understood and agreed that for any such services provided to
City, with the City's written consent, the full cost of such services are not fixed for any period of time
as are Bank provided services, and will be passed along to the City. Such services include, but are not
limited W armored caffier, deposit courier, and messenger service.
R:WORTONL~AGENDAStB~IVKINO. A~3N ~
EXTENT OF AGREEMENT
This document, the portions of Exhibit 'A* and *B* incorporated herein by reference and the
'Cash Management Terms and Conditions* represent the entire integrated Agreement between City and
Ban~ and supersede all prior negotiations, represe~t_~ions or agreements, either written or oral. This
Agreement and the incorporated portions of Exhibit 'A' and *B' may be amended only by written
instrument signed by both City and Ban~. The *Cash Management Terms and Conditions' may be
amended only as provided therein.
R:WORTONLIAI3ENDASIBANrJNO. AGN r~
IN WITNESS WHEIEOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the date stated above.
CITY OF TEMECULA
FIRST INTERSTATE BANK
City Manager
A Municipal Corporation
Signed:
Title:
signed:
Title:
ATTEST:
City Clerk of the
City of Temecula
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney of the
City of Temecula
P,.'V*IOtlTONLb4OENDA~IB4NI(~IO. AON 5/2/96
Fee Schedule
Business
Accounts-
E~i~e J~ ]. ]9~V
First
Interstate
Bank of California
FEE SCHEDULE -- BUSINESS ACCOUNTS
E. ffech~e Jsdy I. 1~4
T~ese prices are egecti~e as of Jsdy 1.1~4. Unless miwrwrise agreed in ,,ri~ng. prices mind Accmmm AmmbJsb ~ mind rmes ,my ;~mnle m ~ny n~,~
~itkom nolice. Not ~!I prices m reflet'~ tm thiv list. Ym~ mn t~=mn ~wre~ pr~e ~/ormm~m from yimr Arerest O~ker. 8ervk~ ~ed ~
c~r. ~c~t or ~1~ ~ed ~ ~ ~es.
ACCOUNT ANALYSISRATES
Receive sccount analysis repom smuau~.is~ cash insrage-
merit services used snd account bslss:e informsira. Use
invumble bslsncu in your deposit sccoums to generate credit
.Sa bankchm o
rrm
ACCOUNT ANALYS~ RATES
Bued on tim av~rqe 91 day T-Bill
Auction rm~, dismum Iramira,
Prime Rate plus 3%
AMOUNT UNIT
Ledger0verdra~Rate t.2
Prime Rate plus 3%
FDIC'
FDIC assessed rate
Reserve Requirement' "
F~deral Reserve Bank as~m~i rate
investable
Avenge daily
Avm'sge
1. Wem~mfim~$Mmoammm~Ommmmomsmmmimmitmmmmyfimmmmmmiwimimm
lm~rmTImmmmmmmmmmammammm'miiml~fmmyom~OIfmmr-
2. Pm. kmmmmimmmdm~mm~i:hFmmmimmmmmmmm~mmm~mmmltm~mm~mmmmimmm
m0mei~cmmm~!~-~$mmmegmimm. l~k=, '~ m
cmmma-,b-nmmmMmmmmmma~mmhmSmmmk'rm~mimmy
--a-,.iomm m. dm~otbdo~imkxm.
GENF_~ ACCOUNT SERVICES
Receive timely mud mccurmm pinecuing of all deposits and pmid
items for youF Demmmd Dt~omit Ac~ounu. Maintain Zao
Balsaoe A~;ou~s to fa~iimm excea~ cash invulm~t by
ptovidin.~ automa~ funding of your compmmfs distwu,aemmm
re:mints and cm~-ntratim of funds from multiple conectioo
acca-mt~
mm
DEPOSIT SER VICE~
Aoxwmt M-inte,,~ $15.00
Accmm~ Smmmmm
.ac!r~c~=l Smm~mm,~t 5.50
81m:ial Smmmmuu 5.50
51mchl Smuummt W'sthout lmms 5.50
Debit Poming 0.13
Stop Payments
Autc~a~ Stop Payment 6.00
^Ut~..*h d StOp Payment Inqu~ 1.00
Mmml Stop Payment 12.00
C, ssh~'s Check S.O0
Check Collection 20.00
Facsimile 6°00
Photocopy 6.00 item or m'-*~ ..,.am '~ i
3. $12 pffimm. with adaily maxbmam of $601~r day pstammsat f~rdmdm i. i!
mmmm~mem, m!~aimmm~mm~.Aimo. slmimimm~o, mimm~mm~ "~'-~
perm
ZERO BALANCE ACCOUNT
ZBAMmmmAccomu
M*~n,~w,-,,~e S35.00
zs^ Sutmidimy Ammm
Malnst m~am'~t
Bminms.J~ _ F-,dimmmmBamkdCalifoam
DEPOSITORY SERVICES
.educe your check clearing costs and accelerate the avafiabil-
~J of your deposits by delivering high volume deposiu digcfiy
aMOU~ teat
C!iECK CLEARING
Deposit Ticket'
Branch $1.3~ per iron
0pcrations Center 1.10 per item
Checks Deposited Branch 0Js',,asd~)
Local 0.10 per Ban
Non-Locsl 0.1l periron
On-UsB:31p,m.-10:(X)t,m. 0.035 per iron
On-Us 10:01 a.m.-8:30 p.m. 0.0~S per iron
Local Clearing House 0.048 pet iron
Local Fed 0.055 per iunn
Fh-s~ lnenm~ Aff*diae Ci~ 0.055 per immn
Other Tramit 0.08 pea' is
Travelers Checks 0.0~ per item
Excessive Rejects
(over 0.7% pet month) 0..$0 per item
Deposit Coi~efion 1 ..SOper ~oe
4. A!!depositsafesubjectlo~Depmitdikm~ ~ttwillbe
adjumedtothe&gc~u.-~.nominddiL..~'-' exchmbd.
S. To emu~eme-dej kdletced~imm mm belteepmed m:m/el lo
mmin~ordmmyed~m~d~~ff~o(
mcdJxmdlk,wud~m.r. ddepodtmpa)vidaJwMdnmnmdays.
RETURNED FFEMS
Rengned It=ms $ 5.00 per inn
Spec Adv Opt m
Multiple Advi~ 1.00 per ~
Maker lafmmgion 0.15 psr ilgm
ACTION Special Repom
Malzrlnfonnafion 0.15 perftid
Deposits R~gi~
Cash Vault Deposit Tu:kn $1.10 per deposit
Non-Standard Deposit 5.543 per deposit
Deposit Adjuremere 6.25 pe~ adjusnnent
Standard CmTency 0.90 per $ l,OOO
Non*Standard Curtely 1.20 per Sl,000
Branch ~ 1.25 per SlJ00
Non-Stmdmd Coin-Rolled 7.50 per bag
Branch Coin 0. 10 per roll
Food Stmnl~ neposie~J
Strapped? 0.00 per S 1,000
t,oose 0.00 per Sl,000
coupon.
~landing l_rsO p~ onk=
Cmmm 3.00 . per onk= ·
E~Sc~y 10.00 !~
Standard Currency 0.90 per $1,000
Non-Standard Cunuty 120 per Sl,000
Branch ~ 1.50 !mr Sl,000
Coin/Full Box 3.00 per box
Coin/Helf Box 2,00 p~ bdf-box
CoinR~ls 0.10
Brm~ Coin 0.2~ l~r roll
Brm~b Coin/F,B!! Box 4.2~ !~ ~
mdjmmmdmmlmmmcmmmmm. mlk,,. iemegleed. --.
7.1dmtbeFekrdRmeveBmkiteady. '-
Impmvethes:asrspyofyosr~sshfomsstbynsczivisSeslY
~s~t A~.
CO~OLL~D D~~
T~s
F~t ~t S1~
1-~,~ 0.1~
1-~,~ 0.1~
M~y Mini~ 10.~
A~ON ~ ~R)
M~y Msint~-~ ~.~
S~ I~ ~
~1 I~ ~ 0.14
~o~ s
F~t ~t 1~.~
A~ ~ 1~.~
~ ~d Wilt ~t ~ 1-~,~ 0.15
~ ~d Wil ~ ~m
1-~,~ 0~
1-~,~ O~
A~ON ~
~~(S~~) a.~
~ ~ ~ ~h~) 0.~
Tmmscsioa Chstges
FedmdPaymem aodssrge
Stse Payment $ 2.00 per payment
Fsx ~ 4.00 per paymint
PC Fimsx Mslntmsn,-e 10.00 !~ s:mm~
PC F'-a Trsnss:fim 2.00 per tx~--"
!zUNi~TRANI
fundsma~straliz~scoamwithoorCashCo~cs'~s6oa
AUT01~IATED CLEARING HOUSE (ACH)
Semp (One T'mae)
Trsnm~i*-ion Setup $2.~).00
-Vendor Setup' f~O.00
ACTION ACH So~
ACTION ACH Data Import -
~ofiwttt ht*,~fisti~m 200.00
Mtmt!~
AC'rlON ACH M,im~m.,~t
luput
ACTION A(~I ~
Ts ?a": ~
ACH I)dsit/CmdiX 14~ 0.14
ACHDebil/Crs~ 2.,0¢X)-.~,999 0.11
AUTOMATED CLEARING BOUSE (ACB) ¢Comirmed)
ACH Debit/Credit On-Us $ 0.0~ per
ACTION ACH Debit/Credit 0.25 per item
ACTION ACH Debi~t
On-Us 0. 15 per
ACH Night Cycle Sun:barge 0.02 per inn
p.x=paon
AC~Debit/CmditRnmn 5.00 per item
ACH Debit/Credit
Remm Autoroared 3..50 psr
No~~cmion of Chan~ 3.00 lzr immmm
Nofi~mim of C!mmg~
ACH Dsbit Rsclsm~ 1.25 lm~
ACH Dslmion/l~vmml
Amomp-,~! 7.00 lm~
Rssm~<l Ysm~ 15.00 pm~msmpm
9. pkamComactyour,d~ccoent(M~cerfotqulifyinJvemjo~s).
CASH CONCENTRATION
Concenu'ation Vendor
Monfixly M-inWn*s,~e
Ctmcmn~on M-infer-qce
Co!lcelllr~on
Vendor
Input
Direa Transmission
Concenntion Trm~mis*ion
ACTION Cash ~ation
Tenn~
Locsion n~-ponsd
~ns piem neponed
Vo~eOperatorinput
t.ocsion neponsd
~nSnemneponsd
Touch-Tone Inpm
~nSneMneponzd
Reports
summary items Prin~d
$175.00 per account
100.00 per
100.00 per ctaze~natioa
ao:oont
100.00 !~r nmc~mm~on
0.45 per inn
0.45 per itsan
0.85 peritem
0.85 per inn
0.75 psr inn
0.75 per innn
0.06 per inn
0.06 per inn
CASll CONCDITRATION (Cramsseal)
.Omctdtmmi~m ACH $ 0.22
Conmnmion On-Us 0.18
~mion DTC 1.10
!n-xeep6,,n l~onming
~a6on Rennns 25.00
~ation Retnrns Auto 25.00
~atlon P, smms DTC 50.00
ACTION Cash Concsm~on
Lontion ~ 3.00
Insrim
ELECTRO~C DATA INTERCHANGE (EDI)
FIRST INTERSTATE CASH CONCENTRATOR (FICC)
Terminallnitia~Sstvicss
~ W'n~ Rspetitive
1-100 7.00
101-500 6.50
501+ 6.00
Outping W'~e Nen-~ve
1-100 10.00
101-500 9_q0
501+ 9.00
Iramini W'nt Nm-Repetifive 8.50
Oq, oing Wins Repir 6.00
perm
WIRE TRANSFER SERVICES (Conanued)
Voice Initiated Services '
TeleTranSfer $15.00 per ~
TeleTranSfer Book Transfer 7.00 per wire
International Wim'USD or FX) 25.00 per wire
Draw Down Wire 8.00 per wire
Automatic Stm~_in.* Invxuaim 10.00 per wi~
~g Wire Automaid 7.50 per wire
]ncom_ing Wh'e Manu~ 10.00 per wire
Draw Down Wire 15.00 per wire
Administrative Messages
Outgoing ~.W .LET. 2~.00 peg wire
Terminal 1.50 per advice
T~iephone 10.00 per advice
S.W.I.F.T. 7.50 per advice
Informafio~ Rc~or~ng
Wh~ Inquh~ 0~0 pa inquh~
INFORMATION SERVICES
Access previous day account information at Fint hunrote or
other banks esrly morning by ccmaputef. termind or much-tone
telephone. Monitor intrsday positions with Current Day
Balance and Transaction services.
PREVIOUS DAY BALANCK/TRANSACTION
RKPORTING SKitVICES
Standard Reportin.a
(up to 10 accoums)
Aummatic Balance Repoaing
BAI Format Repov~_e
Voice Balance Repoaing
Transaction Fees
Summary Items 099 per inn
Detail Inns 0.14 per item
CURRENT DAY BALANCE/TRANSACTION
REPORTING SERVICES
Cuffent Day; BAI Form~
Voice S30.00 per user
Tran-- ~ Fees
Detail lunns 0. 14 per item
OTHER INFORMATION SERVICES
TrmmctiouFees
Smnmsry Items Outbound 0~0 per item
DetaillnmOutbound 0.25 peritan .-
;xte,,4.d Data Storage 20.00
Transactim: Search Found 1..~0
Fax Delivery 0.50
savicefmaudli~immfmoflh~Finthmp,m_Bamkofm
INTERNATIONAL SERVICES
per gore
Muimizemepaxtuctivizyofyourfundswimmiavr.-m-a
w-,,-temem~~yeih~tomeetyour
company's goals and raluimnems. For mote htf~,,aim,
pleme contact your Acaxmt Offier.
LOCKBOX SERVICF~
~elerate availability of customer reqfin-m-es, reduce
,~:eivable ~-qS costs, and improve nmnagement of
receivable accounm with Firit lnlersmle's Locidxwt mn'vic~
film AIIOtlWT
WBOLES,tLm'- LOCKBOX
Lockbox Monltdy Msin~m,-qt'e $160.00
Items Processed
Basic Hocessing 0.36
Basic ProcessinS and lYmxocopy 0.45
per month
]VlaintepsqCt
DqxBitReVoning
Talephone
ACT]ON Special
Fax
_160.00
0.015
40.00 pernmmh
0,07 perline
210.00 per momh
RETAIl. LOCKBOX
MERCHANT SERVICES
Receive a full range of Debit and Credit Card services for
merchants across the Fwst inl~,dale mminy. Formote
information, please contact your Account Offmer.
RECONCILIATION SERVICES
Automatically reconcile your deposit and ~ account
activity with timely infofmadon fnnxn ourdepMit symnas.
film MIOIJNT
ACCOUNT RECONCILIATION
Setup $100.00 per acemint
Full Account Rea~qi*Hms 100.00 per acamt
Tranwmieilm 0.08 ~ ~
Clinch Paid with Tape 0.09 per
RECONf~!I J&TION bIKRVICF.,S (Contimed)
Patvial Accmn Reco,~'Bmion $ 60.00 per account
Chech Paid 0.07 per inn
Additional Reconciliation Services
AdditimalRepons 8.00 Ferrelmrt
Data Transmission Output 15.00 nmtsmission
0.005 per item
0.01 per item
0.01 per item
Check Sating 0.05 peritem
Depmit Recmac~is~m ~5.00 per sccomst
DqxmitsPooted 0.10 per item
Diskeae0m~ 35.00perdisken~
PC BASED RECONt~uJ&TION SOF!lVARE
AccmetCbecimPaid $0.07 per item
!demthly ~ 10.00 per mccmmt
TRUST SEI'VICES
Wwk ~ knowkdSeabk, uf~ prof.~..-k m d.ila
ammlamSrmtomeetyourcomlmy'smedsm!~jL:'~u.
OurTmstDt,. m,ntoffenafullrmgeofEmpioyeeBenefit,
Cmtody,~Tmst and Stock T~ services. For
Ym,,.,,,~mayM4ktimdmlkdaym itmislmmmdl~/dsmmicw
otlmrmmawatmms~rmelmmam ..... mamdl~mtatm
imdmmmmmymmhmmMmmmdqmmimdloramBmmmimimm '..
makinlmdaciaimmdialmeranilmfar~dmmila~fmmlsmm~
Im,,,~,mmsyaimimmmmlmmmaiiamfmmi~_ -wm,-.dlm,
limmfmmmmoflbmi0mm. mmdmommw/mmmmmmf ' ' ' mmmmmlM "" .~':
'
l'Vkmqmmmmd~mamimf, mmchmddmmmmmmmm' ' K -ram "~
.
f~im~LC ' m~qMmmimglmmmmdmmmmymmmmltimmmpmmimllmimtmm~, .....
FmmmtimmmmmmomBmmmkmmmmtlmmiSMmdimm:aydmmm~mymmrmmmmmmtbmm$,' "::'~
!kmmk~-'-pmmm/mmlmmmm(m4.,!mmmmSm, mmmmil. mmmim. mm.)immmmmud ' .~
mymmrMimdf. Ymmmmy, m, mmlmmmmlmmmmdmmmSmmlmimmlm}mmr ' .:~
mmmwMmmlmlmmvidmmr. /" ':-~
ByamVqmymmmmaw~MmalmrmWOO)d.N ..:,~
IMlmmd llty lR. tJm B mld i l MIImjn, vdlkh l fJllm - -.. ?; ~ :
, ~ "_ aad,,,s~, " -byamllmwmm}musmaRntlammm
Immlc. lmtemlymd,,,.m' -lainrail. . .'-?
,.r,,~,
ITEM 7
APPROVAL E~~C~
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFI
CITY MANAG
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Council/City Manager
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
May 9, 1995
"Please Save Lives - Don't Drink and Drive"
PREPARED BY:
Martin C. Lauber, Traffic Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
The Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommends that the City Council approve the "Please
Save Lives - Don't Drink and Drive" sign program proposed by the Temecula Community
Partnership.
BACKGROUND:
The Temecula Community Partnership - Community Committee, has contacted the Traffic
Division of the Public Works Department regarding the installation of "Please Save Lives -
Don't Drink and Drive" signs. The Traffic Division was not familiar with accepted practices
regarding the use of signs of this type. Staff has contacted 16 cities within Southern
California and found that none were currently using similar signs, but that many traffic
engineers would consider their use if requested.
The proposed signs are not official traffic control devices recognized by the State of California
Department of Transportation, therefore there are no guidelines for use. The proposed sign
design was formulated during a workshop set-up by the Public/Traffic Safety Commission (See
Attached). The City has previously allowed similar informational type signs, in limited use,
such as the "Buckle-Up For Safety" signs.
The proposed sign locations were derived from input provided by the Public/Traffic Safety
Commission, Temecula Police and the Temecula Community Partnership - Community
Committee, and are shown on the attached exhibit.
-i- r:~aldtpt~95~O50g~biddti.~m/a~
FISCAL IMPACT:
The Temecula Community Partnership is offering to bear the cost of all signs required to
remind our citizens of the dangers of drinking and driving. The Partnership's approved budget
will be able to cover the cost of seven (7) signs. The Department of Public Works,
Maintenance Division will mount all signs on existing sign posts or street light poles.
ATTACHMENTS:
Proposed Sign - "Please Save Lives - Don't Drink and Drive"
Proposed Sign Locations
=2- r:~agdtpt~95%,OSO9~dr~n~d-i.agn/ajp
!
CITY OF TEMECULA
Proposed Sign Locations
ITEM 8
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPRnVAI
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
May 9, 1995
Acceptance of Public Improvements in Parcel Map No. 22629
PREPARED BY: -~'~Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council ACCEPT the public improvements in Parcel Map No. 22629, AUTHORIZE
reduction in Faithful Performance Security amounts for the improvement of streets and
drainage, AUTHORIZE the release of the Subdivision Monumentation security amount, DIRECT
the City Attorney to prepare reconveyance documents, and DIRECT the City Clerk to so notify
the Developer.
BACKGROUND:
On October 22, 1992, the City Council entered into subdivision agreements with:
Jack B. Koczarski
164 Lounsbury Road
Trumbull, CT 06611
for the improvement of street and drainage, end subdivision monumentation in Parcel Map No.
22629. Securities for these obligations were' posted by lien agreement end a grant deed was
granted to the City for that purpose. The secured amounts are as follows:
Street and Drainage Improvements-Faithful Performance
Street and Drainage Improvements-Labor and Material
Subdivision Monumentation
$34,500
17,250
1,210
The grant deed was executed and delivered under the condition that it shall be null end void
upon the full end faithful performance of the terms and conditions of the Subdivision
Improvement Agreement. The deed covered both of the pertinent parcels prior to the
recordation of Parcel Map No. 22629, Parcel 3 and Lot "C" of Parcel Map No. 9197.
-1- r.~egdmt~SlO4251m2262S~ee
The following items have been completed by the developer in accordance with the approved
plane:
Street and drainage improvements within Parcel Map No. 22629
Survey Monuments within Parcel Map No. 22629
Staff has inepected and verified the public improvements. The Public Works Department
therefore recommends acceptance of the public improvements, reduction in Faithful
Performance secured amount to the ten-percent warranty level, and initiation of the one-year
warranty period.
Therefore it is appropriate to reduce the Faithful Performance security amount as follows:
Street and drainage Improvements
~31,050
The Faithful Performance secured amount for the warranty period is as follows:
Street and drainage Improvements
$3,450
Staff will examine the value of the parcels and analyze release by reconveyance to the
developer of several of the four subdivided parcels and coordinate with the City Attorney for
recommendation to the City Council. The objective is to retain the minimum number of parcels
necessary to assure that the value of land the City holds is sufficient to meet any claims
against either the Faithful Performance warranty or Labor and Materials security amounta~
The developer was also required to post Labor and Material security to ensure payment to
suppliers and workers. This security is maintained in effect for a period of time determined by
the Subdivision Improvement Agreement after the City Council has acceded the public
improvements.
The affected streets are not being accepted into the City maintained street system at this time.
The streets within the subdivision are portions of Via Telesio and Green Tree Road.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
Attachments:
Location Map
-2- r:.%egdq~gb'~O42b'~xt~22629,eee
PARCF, I, MAP NO, 29.629
Location Map
ITEM 9
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL:
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFIC
CITY MANAGE
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
May 9, 1995
Supplement No. 006 to Local Agency - State Agreement for Federal Aid
Project No. STPLN-5459, I-15/I-215 Corridor Study
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 95-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING SUPPLEMENT NO. 006, TO LOCAL
AGENCY AGREEMENT NO. 08-5459, BETWEEN THE STATE
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE CITY OF
TEMECULA FOR FEDERAL AID PROJECT NO. STPLN-5459, I-
1 511-215 CORRIDOR STUDY.
BACKGROUND:
On March 23, 1993 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 93-26 approving "Local
Agency/State Agreement No. 08-5459 between the State Department of Transportation and
the City. The agreement establishes the Federal Funding provisions (Master Agreement).
The agreement and the resolution provide for funding future projects by supplemental
agreements for individual Faderally Funded Project.
The current project, I-15/I-215 Corridor Study has been approvad for Federal funding in the
amount of $100,000, representing 88.53% eligible costs of the estimated $112,956 total
cost.
The project is a joint effort by the cities of Temecula and Murrieta, with the City of Temecula
as the lead agency.
The balance of the local funding in the amount of ~ 12,956 is the responsibility of the two (2)
cities, each participating in the amount of ~6,478 or 50% of the local share.
-1- r:%agdrpt%95%0509~.l-15egrmt.euplejp
FISCAL IMPACT:
The project is being funded through the grant of $100,000 and the local share of $12,956
with the City of Temecula being responsible for 50% or $6,478 of that local share. The
project is budgeted for this Fiscal Year, Account No. 210-165-633-5802,1-15 Corridor Study
(Capital Improvement Project Fund, Public Works Projects). Source of funds for the local share
of $6,478 is funded through Development Impact Fees.
Attachments:
Resolution No. 95-
-2- r:%egdrpt%95%O509%l-15agnnt.euplejp
RESOLIFrlON NO. 95-
A RESOLUTION OF ~ CITY COUNCIL OF TVrF~ CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING SUPPt.EMENT NO. 006, TO
LOCAL AGENCY AGI~EEMENT NO. 085459, BETWEEN
THF~ STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND
THE C1TY OF TEMECULA FOR FEDERAL AID PRO~ECT
NO. STPLN-54b'9, 1-15/I-215 CORRIDOR STUDY.
The City Council of the City of Temecula does resolve, determine and order as follows:
WHEREAS, City Council at this regular meeting of March 23rd, 1993 adopted
Resolution No. 93-26.
WHKREAS, ~aid Resolution approved the Local Agency/State Agreement No. 08-5459.'
W~'~EAS, said Resolution provided for supplemental agreements to be adopted by the
Council for each individual project which utilizes the Federal Funds.
WHEREAS, City has applied for Federal Funds to lxafotm the study on 1-15FI-215
Corridor, Federal Aid Project No. STPLN-5459.
WHEREAS, these funds are available and subject to Program Supplement No. 006 for
Local Agency State Agreement for Federal Aid Project No. STPLN-5459.
NOW, 'FHEI~v]?OR, BE 1T RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Temecula,
as follows:
Section 1.
That the City Council appwve and authorize execution of Program
Supplement No. 006 to Local Agency State Agreement for Federal Aid
Project No. STPLN-5459.
Section 2. Authorize the Mayor to execute said Agreement
Section 3. The City Clerk sha, codify the adoption of this resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOFrED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula
at a regular meeting held on the 9th day of May, 1995.
ATTEST:
Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor
June S. Greek
City Clerk
[SEAL]
- 1 - r:%egdfpt%95%0509%1-15agnnt.euplajp
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that
Resolution No.95- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 9th day of May, 1995 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILM~-MBERS:
COUNCIMEMBERS:
COUNCIt4~MBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
-2- r:%sgdrpt%g5%OSO9%l-15agnnt.sup/ejp
ITEM 10
APPRO L
CITY ATTORNER~~
FINANCE OFFIC
CITY MANAGE
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
(~ City Manager/City Council
Shawn D Nelson of Community
. , Director Services
May 9, 1995
SUBJECT: Summary on the Interim Fire Station
PREPARED BY: ~(~'/Phyllis L. Ruse, Senior Management Analyst
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive and file the summary for the interim
Fire Station located at Linfield School.
BACKGROUND: On January 17, 1995, the City Council directed staff to locate a site and
construct an interim fire station on the east side of Interstate 15. The City Council
appropriated $256,000 for the lease, site improvements and staffing costs through June 30,
1995, and directed staff to open this interim facility by April 1, 1995.
Staff investigated available sites, selecting Linfield School as the best location and most cost
effective to meet the City's goals. A lease agreement was negotiated and the temporary
station was constructed and opened for service on March 31, 1995. The station will house
a three to four person company, as well as the new fire engine purchased by the City. The
interim fire station will be operating for 12-16 months, while a permanent station is being
designed and constructed on Pauba Road, just west of Margarita Road.
The summary of costs to construct and place this facility into operation for three months in
FY 94/95 is as follows:
Site Improvements
Lease with Linfield
Modular Units (lease)
Modular Units (one time set up costs)
Engine Port
Fumiture, Fixtures and Equipment
38,543
1,800
6,900
11,002
5,219
9.756
Sub-Total $ 73,220
Staffing Costs
$189,780
TOTAL .$256.000
FISCAL IMPACT: The total cost of establishing an interim fire station and staffing through
June 30, 1995 is $256,000. $256,000 was appropriated from the City's General Fund
reserve.
ITEM 11
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORN~
FINANCE OFFIGE
CITY MANAGE
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Council
Ronald E. Bradley, City Manager
May 9, 1995
City Attorney Service Analysis
PREPARED BY:
Mary Jane McLarney, Assistant City Manager
Grant M. Yates, Human Resources Administrator
RECOMMENDATION:
Based on the results of this analysis, staff is recommending that City Attorney services
continue to be provided on a contract basis. In addition, the recommendation includes
retaining Peter Thorson, and Burke, Williams and Sorenson, as the City Attorney.
BACKGROUND:
Since incorporation, City Attorney services have been provided by the firm of Burke,
Williams and Sorenson. Peter Thorson, a Partner in the Firm and director of the firm's
public law division, has served as Temecula's City Attorney since May 10, 1994. Burke,
Williams and Soreneon has provided the City with a full range of legal services including:
general government, redevelopment, special projects (including municipal code
codification), general litigation, insurance litigation, special districts, community services
and planning.
DISCUSSION:
The legal authority for the City Attorney is found in the Temecula Municipal Code.
According to Chapter 2.24.010 of the Municipal Code - the City Attorney's Office shall
consist of the City Attorney and such assistants as may be authorized by the City Council.
The functions of the Office of the City Attorney outlined in the Municipal Code are as
follows:
(1)
Advise the Council and all City Officers in all matters of law pertaining to
their offices.
(2)
Furnish legal services at all meetings of the Council, except when excused or
disabled, and give advice or opinion on the legality of all matters under
consideration by the Council, Boards and Commissions, or Officers of the
City.
(3)
Prepare and/or approve all ordinances, resolutions, agreements, contracts
and other legal instruments as shall be required for the proper conduct of the
business of the City and approve the form of all contracts, agreements and
bonds given to the City.
(4)
Perform such other legal duties as may be required by the Council or as
necessary to complete the performance of the foregoing functions.
CITY ATTORNEY CONTRACT FEE AND SERVICE PROVISIONS
The City entered into a letter of agreement with Burke, Williams and Sorenson on July 12,
1991, which set the monthly retainer {between the firm and the City) at $3,150.00 for 35
hours of "General Counsel" work, Additional services, in excess of 35 hours, to be billed
on an hourly basis of $115,00 for the City Attorney and Assistant City Attorney. Legal
work, performed by other members of the firm, to be billed at each attorney's standard
billing rate - currently ranging between $115,00 and $225,00 per hour,
The legal services to be performed by the City Attorney under contract include:
1)
The preparation of ordinances, resolutions, orders, agreements, forms,
notices, declarations, certificates and other documents required by the City.
2)
Attendance at all meetings of the City Council, Redevelopment Agency and
the Planning Commission for the City; and all other meetings of City
boards, commissions, and committees, when so requested by the City
Council or the City Manager.
3)
Rendering legal advice and opinions concerning legal matters that affect the
City, including new legislation and court decisions.
4)
Representing the City in litigation involving the City, including both
prosecution and defense, except workers' compensation matters,
5)
Attorneys will not serve as bond counsel for municipal financing matters
except as directed by the City Council.
OTHER LEGAL SERVICES UTILIZED BY THE CITY
In addition to contract City Attorney services, the City also uses other law firms, from time
to time, for matters in which Burke, Williams and Sorenson may not have special expertise
or where they may have a conflict. Examples include:
Legal services for personnel related issues are provided by Jeffrey Freedman from the Los
Angeles firm of Rexon, Freedman, Klepetar, and Hambleton.
Legal services for certain redevelopment issues am being handled by Kane, Ballmer &
Berkman. This firm has worked with the City on the stipulated judgment,
INTRODUCTION
The demand for City Attorney services has been steadily increasing since 1991. The City
has grown in population, staff needs and complexity of issues which, in turn, has
increased the demands placed on the City Attorney.
The following analysis will attempt to closely compare costs of in-house versus contract
services. This information must be prefaced with the understanding that there are pros
and cons associated with each service delivery method and these factors must be
considered, along with the bottom line, in reviewing in-house versus contract services.
COST ANALYSIS:
CONTRACT SERVICES
The Actual cost to the City for all eandces provided by Burke, Williams and Sorenson is
detailed as follows:
FY 1991-92 e231,759
FY 1992-93 $503,314
FY 1993-94 e561,438
Approximately 37% of all charges in FY 1993-94 are related to litigation and claims.
Although litigation expanses are unpredictable from year to year, it is reasonable to assume
that these costs will continue at some level regardless of the method of providing City
attorney services. :
The projected budget for general government expanses has actually decreased since 1991.
This can be explained, in part, by tighter accounting procedures that spread the charges to
the appropriate file and the development of an internal service fund for insurance and
litigation related expanses.
The general government budget since 1991 is as follows:
FY 1992-93
FY 1993-94
FY 1994-95
FY 1995-96
~358,305 (Actual)
~341,419 (Actual)
~288,000 (Budgeted)
~250,000 (Proposed)
The remainder of attorney charges are related to other areas including: special financing
districts, litigation, community services and redevelopment agency expanses.
SERVICE LEVELS
The number of service hours billed, for all services during FY 1993-94, totaled 3,944
hours. This calculates out to an average of 76 hours par week, which is slightly less than
two (2) full-time attorneys.
IN-HOUSE CiTY ATTORNFY COSTS
The following will detail the costs associated with bringing this function in-house. These
expenditures only include the cost of the City Attorney, one (1) Assistant City Attorney
and one (1) Legal Secretary. As noted previously, Temecula is generating enough work to
keep two full-time attorneys busy, Therefore, the Assistant City Attorney position is
included to accurately compare the costs of the two service delivery methods.
IN-HOUSE START UP AND OPERATING EXPENSES
SALARY EXPENSES
NOTES
City Attorney Salary
Benefit Costs
Assistant City Attorney
Benefit Costs
Legal Secretary
Benefit Costs
SUB-TOTAL
$96,424
33,748
87,216
30,526
37,361
13.076
$298,351
Salaries based on attached salary survey.
Benefits calculated at 35% of salary.
OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE EXPENSES NOTES
Auto Allowance $ 4,800
Telephones 2,000
Training 8,000
Dues and Subscriptions 11,000
Office Supplies 1,500
Postage 1,000
Professional Meetings 1,000
SUB-TOTAL $ 29,300
Allowance for City Attorney and
Assistant.
See attached subscription listing
START UP EXPENSES
NOTES
Equipment $ 15,000
Law Library 69.100
SUB-TOTAL $ 84,100
Three computer stations, software,
cabinets, etc.
See attached listing.
TOTALCOSTS
$411.751
HIRING OF PARA-LEGAL
Staff has reviewed the option of hiring one para-legal employee who could possibly reduce
the amount of research time the City Attorney needs to spend on issues; thereby, reducing
the legal expenditures.
The para-legal employee could utilize the current law library and obtain needed office
support and supplies from either the City Clerk's Office and/or the City Manager's Office.
The annual salary and benefits for this position is estimated at approximately $60,000;
however, we were unable to find a comparable position when conducting a salary survey.
At this time, it is staff's recommendation not to hire 8 para-legal employee. The duties of
the para-legal would be primarily to complete contracts and conduct general legal research
on jssues.
The City has standard contract forms and all departments are well versed in the procedure
for completing the contracts; therefore, many of the responsibilities that a para-legal would
perform are currently being handled on a department level. In addition, Burke, Willjams and
Sorenson has proposed training sessions be conducted twice a year to further assist staff
in understanding the requirements the City's standard agreements. These training sessions
would be offered to the City at no cost and will allow staff to continue to be effective in
handling this responsibility. Burke, Williams and Sorenson has also offered to provide staff
basic training in current municipal legal issues, which could-further lessen the need for a
para-legal employee and enable staff to respond to potential legal issues before they
become problems without extensive City Attorney time.
CONCLUSION:
A major advantage of hiring a City Attorney and accompanying staff is increased
accessibility for City staff. However, this can also become a disadvantage as the City
Attorney's Office may be relied upon to do administrative work that does not require an
Attorney.
Another advantage of continuing with a contract City Attorney is the City's ability to tap
into the expertise of many subject matter experts who work in the firm. In addition, by
contracting with a large firm, the City will benefit from the resources that a large firm can
provide.
As previously mentioned, the City will still experience litigation related expenses regardless
of how City Attorney services are delivered. Therefore, by adding the 37% litigation
expense, the in-house costs (~564,099)are comparable to contract charges (e561,438).
Based upon this information, it is staff's recommendation that we retain the services of a'
contract City Attorney.
Another important consideration is that by retaining a contract firm, the City can have
complete control over expenditures. This can be very important if, at some point in the
future, the City does experience financial hardships, we can control the amount of work
given to the Attorney. If we had a staff attorney, it is more difficult to reduce expenditures
without layoffs.
Attorney services and corresponding costs are based on usage. Therefore, a reduction in
cost is contingent upon management and the City Council making a coordinated effort to
reduce requested legal services.
To address this issue, staff is proposing that the City Council adopt the attached cost-
containment policy that requires approval of a department director before an employee can
directly access City Attorney services.
We would be happy to answer any questions on this information and await further
direction.
Attachment
TEMECULA COMMUNITY
SERVICES DISTRICT
ITEM 1
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
HELD APRIL 11, 1995
A regular meeting of the Temecula Community Services District was called to order at 8:56
PM at the Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California.
President Ron Roberrs presiding.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT: 5
ABSENT: 0
DIRECTORS: Lindemans, Mu~oz, Parks, Roberrs, Stone
DIRECTORS: None
Also present were General Manager Ronald E. Bradley, General Counsel Peter Thorson and
City Clerk June S. Greek.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None given.
CONSENT CALENDAR
City Clerk June Greek stated she has a request to speak on Item No. 6.
It was moved by Director Parks, seconded by Director Stone to approve Consent Calendar
Items 1-5. The motion was unanimously carried.
1. Minutes
1.1
1.2
Approve the minutes of February 28, 1995;
Approve the minutes of March 14, 1995.
Comolqtion and Acceotance of the Loma Linda Park Phase II Imorovements - Project
No. PW94-O~CSD
2.1 File the Notice of Completion and release the Performance Bond.
2.2
Accept a one (1) year Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the
contract value upon acceptance of the improvements.
2.3
Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after acceptance of
the improvements in no liens have been filed to that date.
R:%agenda.csd~041195 I 5/1/95
Completion and Accemance of the Soorts Park Sloe Repair Improvements - Project
No. PW93-06CSD
3.1 File the Notice of Completion and release the Performance Bond.
3.2 Accept a one (1) year Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the
contract value upon the acceptance of the improvements.
3.3 Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after acceptance of
the improvements if no liens have been filed to that date.
Comoletion and Acceotance of the Kent Hintergardt Memorial Park Imorovements -
Project No. PW94-01CSD
4.1 File the Notice of Completion and release the Performance Bond.
4.2 Accept a one (1) year Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the
contract value upon acceptance of the improvements.
4.3 Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after acceptance of
the improvements if no liens have been filed to that date.
Senior Center Advisory Committee
5.1 Authorize the Community Services Commission to appoint five (5) senior
citizen residents to serve on an ad-hoc Senior Citizen Advisory Committee.
e
Contract for July 4th. 1995 Fireworks Show
Wayne Hall, 42131 Agena, requested that citizens drive carefully during the
fireworks display so that safety of the pedestrians can be insured.
Director Mu~oz asked if there is a plan in place for traffic control at the conclusion
of the fireworks display. Community Services Director Shawn Nelson stated last
year's estimated crowd was approximately 15,000 people. He explained that
coordination with police and fire is taking place to make the event as safe as
possible.
Director MuSoz asked which intersections will have traffic control officers present
and if an actual plan is prepared. Mr. Nelson stated he is not prepared to discuss
specifics of the plan this evening, however he would be happy to provide that
information to the Council.
General Manager Bradley suggested that the Council come in to City Hall and
discuss their suggestions individually.
R:%aOenda.cm:l%041195 2 511/95
It was moved by Director Lindemans, seconded by Director Stone to approve staff
recommendation as follows:
6.1
Award a contract of $17,000 to Robert Caran Productions to produce the
City of Temecula's 1995 July 4th Fireworks Show.
The motion was unanimously carried.
GENERAL MANAGERS REPORT
None given.
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT
Community Services Director Shawn Nelson announced the new van for the Senior Center
arrived and thanked the Ranchorl'emecula Women's Club for their donation. He also
thanked the firm of Alhadeff, Cannon and Rose for their assistance towards the purchase.
Mr. Nelson reported this will allow the City to expand opportunities to seniors who could
not otherwise use these services.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS
Director Parks reported he attended the dedication of Boys and Girls Club Saturday and
over 2,000 children are signed up and participating in that facility. He asked that
additional sites be set aside to provide these types of services.
It was moved by Director Stone, seconded by Director Parks to adjourn at 9:08 PM to a
meeting on April 25, 1995, 8:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista
Road, Temecula, California. The motion was unanimously carried.
Ron Roberts, President
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
R:~genda.ced%041195 3 511/95
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
HELD APltlL_':~5, 1995
A regular meeting of the Temecula Community Services District was called to order at 8:22
PM at the Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California.
President Ron Roberts presiding.
ROLL CALL:
PRESENT:
5 DIRECTORS:
Lindemans, Mufioz, Parks, Stone,
Roberrs
ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None
Also present were City Manager Roneld E. Bradley, City Attorney Peter M. Thorson and
Deputy City Clerk/Deputy Board Secretary Susan W. Jones.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None given.
CONSENT CALFNDAR
It was moved by Director Lindemans, seconded by Director Stone to approve Consent
Calendar Items Nos. 1, 2 and 3. The motion was unanimously carried.
1. Minutes
1.1 Approve the minutes of March 28, 1995.
2. Amendment to Park Imorovement Agreement - Kaufman and Broad
2.1 Approve the amendment to Park Land Improvement Agreement which would
extend the dedication date of the 2.8 acre neighborhood park within Tract
23125-3.
3. Award of Construction Contract for Rancho Califomia Soorts Park Improvement Proiect
- Project No. PW94-07CSD
3.1 Award a contract for Rancho California Sports Park Improvement Project,
Project PW94-O7CSD, to E. A. Mendoza Contracting for $1,452,000.O0and
authorize the President to execute the contract;
3.2 Authorize the General Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the
contingency amount of $145,200.00 which is equal to 10% of the contract
amount.
Minutes%4%25%95 -1 - 05/01 fi5
Citv Council Minute8 Aoril 25, 1995
GENERAL MANAGERS REPORT - Bradley
None given.
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT - Nelson
Director of Community Services Nelson stated the award of contract for Rancho California
Sports Park Improvements Project will be to construct the parking improvements, a new
skateboard park facility end · roller hockey rink on the easterly portion of the Rancho
California Sports Park; staff will move forward with the pre-construction meeting; staff hopes
to break ground on this project within the next 45 days with completion sometime in the
winter of 1996.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS
None given.
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Director Stone, seconded by Director Parks to adjourn at 8:24 PM to a
meeting on May 9, 1995, 8:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road,
Temecula, California.
ATTEST:
Ron Roberts, President
June S. Greek, City Clerk/Community
Services District Secretary
Minutee%4%25%gS -2- 05/01
ITEM 2
APPRO
CITY ATTORNI~R~
FINANCE OFFIC
CITY MANAGE
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
PREPARED BY:
RECOMMENDATION:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
Board of Directors
Ronald E. Bradley, General Manager
May 9, 1995
TCSD Proposed Rates and Charges for FY 1995-96
~,~~ Beryl Yasinosky, Management Assistant
That the Board of Directors:
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO CSD 95-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ON THE RLING
OF A REPORT ON THE PROPOSED RATES AND CHARGES FOR
FISCAL YEAR 1995-96 AND SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR
A PUBLIC HEARING IN CONNECTION THEREWITH
2. Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 95-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AMENDING THE
PROCEDURES FOR APPEALING THE APPLICATION OR
IMPLEMENTATION OF RATES AND CHARGES AGAINST
PROPERTY WITHIN THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES
DISTRICT
BACKGROUND: The Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) operates under the
authority of Community Services District Law and provides parks and recreation, median and
slope maintenance, street and traffic signal lighting, recycling and refuse collection, and street
and road maintenance services in the City of Temecula. The boundaries of the TCSD are
contiguous with the City, and the City Council also serves as the Board of Directors of the
TCSD.
The six current service levels of the TCSD include:
1. Community Services, Parks, and Recreation..
2. Service Level A - Arterial Street Lights, Traffic Signals and Medians·
3. Service Level B- Residential Street Lights.
4. Service Level C - Perimeter Landscaping and Slope Maintenance.
5. Service Level D - Recycling, Refuse Collection and Street Sweeping.
6. Service Level R - Streets and Roads.
Additionally, the TCSD proposes to amend the appeal procedure for the TCSD Rates and
Charges by extending the deadline to December I st for accepting appeals. Since the property
tax bills are mailed in October of each fiscal year, staff feels that the current deadline of
September 1 st does not allow the property owner the opportunity to review their respective
property tax bill. Therefore, extending the deadline to December I st would provide staff with
the ability to process any necessary corrections resulting from the property tax bills.
The TCSD is also required to complete an annual levy process which includes adopting a
resolution accepting the filing of a report on the proposed rates and charges necessary tO
provide the aforementioned services; noticing every property owner in the City; and
conducting a pubic hearing to consider approving the proposed rates and charges.
Staff recommends that the Board of Directors adopt the resolution to accept the filing of the
report on the proposed rates and charges for FY 1995-96 and schedule a public hearing
concerning these issues for June 13, 1995. Staff will then proceed with noticing every
property owner in the City regarding the proposed rates and charges and the June 13th public
hearing. Further, it is recommended that Board of Directors adopt the resolution to amend the
appeal process.
FISCAL IMPACT: The revenue generated from the TCSD FY 1995-96 Rates and Charges will
fund the parks and recreation; median and slope maintenance; street lighting; recycling and
refuse collection; and street and road maintenance services in the City of Temecula. The
proposed TCSD levy budget for FY 1995-96 is ~5,317,267.
ATTACHMENTS:
Resolution of Intention for FY 1995-96 TCSD Rates and
Charges.
Resolution to amend the appeal procedure.
Preliminary annual levy report for FY 1995-96.
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 9~-
A RESOLUTION OF ~ BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
T~tg 'r]~4ECUI~ COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
ON THF~ Ftt,~G OF A F~'3N)RT ON Tffg PROPOSED
SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC m~ARING
IN CONNECTION Tm~Ewrr--
WHEREAS, upon inanpomtion of the City of Temecula, California (the "City")
effective December 1, 1989, voters also appwved the formation of the Temecuh Community
Services Distdct (the "TCSD"), which has the same area and boundaries as the City and whose
Board of Directors (the "Board*) consists of the members of the City Council of the City; and
Va-IEREAS, the TCSD piol~ses to continne such rates and charges for community
services and parks, recreation facilities, services and programs, operation, maimenance, service
and atJmini.¢aation of street lighting, traffic signals, slope maintenance, recycling and refuse
programs, and street and road improvements (the "Services and/or Facilities*), for those areas
speci~ally benefitted thereby and charged by the TCSD for such services in prior fisal years;
and
~, the Board bats requested the pzeparation of a report for Fiscal Year 1995/96
containing the proposed rates and charges, for filing with the Secretary of the TCSD pursuant
to the Community Services District Law being Division 3 of Title 6 of the Government Code
of the State of C~llfornia, COmme~lCing with Section 61000 (the "Act");
NOW, THEREFORE, THE BOARD
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT DOES
ORDER AS FOtlOWS:
OF DIRECTORS OF THE TI~I~CULA
HEREBY, RESOLVE, DIE[ERMINE AND
SECTION 1. Pursuant to Section 61621.2 of the Act, and Engineer's Report for
Collection for the Fiscal Year 1995-96 (the "Report") has been presented and flied with the
Secretary of the TCSD. The P, qx~ coBrains a description of the proposed Services and/or
Facilities to be provided and proposed rates and charges for such Services and/or Facilities and
a description of the parcels subject to rates and charges. A m,mmary of the Report containing
the proposed rates and charges is attached hereto as Exhibit A, entitled "Project Sum~mry" and
is incorporated herein by reference. The Report is based upon a budget adopted by the Board
for the proposed Services and/or Facilities for specific areas where such Services and/or
Facilities are provided, including necessary staff and admini.qrative expenses.
The Report is hereby inlimina~y approved and adopted and is on file in the Office of
the City Clerk. Reference to the Report is hereby made for all pafficulan.
SNCTION 2. The TCSD proposes to collect the rates and charges at the same time, in
the same manner, by the same persons and together with and not separately from, the property
taxes collected within the TCSD. These rates and charges shall be delinquent at the same time
and thereafter be subject to the same delinquency penalties as such property taxes. All hws
applicable to the levy, collection and enforcement of property taxes, including but not limited
to, those pertaining to the matters of delinquency, correction, cancellation, refund and
redemption, are applicable to these rates and charges, except for California Revenue and
Taxation Code Section 4831. However, if for the first year the charge is levied, the real
property to which the charge relates has been transfen'ed or conveyed to a bona fide purchaser
for value, or if a lien of a bona fide encumbrancer for value has been created and attaches
thereon, prior to the date on which the first installment of such taxes appear on the roll, then
the charge, or the delinquency in that charge, nssesse6 pursuant to this section shall not result
in a lien against the pfop~ty, but instead shall be transferred to the unsecured roll for collection.
SPaON 3. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT A PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS
MATTER WnL BE HED BY THE BOARD OF DIRFJ~ORS OF THE TEiVIBCULA
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ON ~ 13, 1995, AT 8:00 P.M., OR AS SOON
TI-I~.F_AFTER AS FEASIBLE IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS LOCATED IN THE
TEMBCUI. A COMMUNITY RF_ERHATION CENTER, 30875 RANCHO VISTA ROAD,
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA. At the public hearing, the Board of Directors of the TCSD will
review and consider any protests received in writing by the Secretary prior to the scheduled
hearing. Public comment regarding the Report by all interested persons will be heard at the
public heating.
SECTION 4. The Secretary is hereby directed to give notice of the public hearing and
the filing of the Report by Publication in a newspaper of general circulation once a week for two
(2) successive weeks and by first class mail to each person who owns a parcel which will be
subject to such rates and charges as such names and addresses are shown in the last equalized
roll or as known to the Secretary.
SECTION 5. The Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED thi.~ 9th day of May, 1995.
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
Ronald H. Robere, President
ATTEST:
June Grcek, Secretary/City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CAY-rI:ORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) SS
CITY OF TEMF, CULA )
I, , Secretary of the Temecuh Community Services District,
I-r~Y DO CERTIFY that the foregoing Resoh~on __ was duly adopted at a regular
meeting .of the Board of Directon of the Temecula Community Services District on the __
day of ,1995, by the following wll call vote:
AYES: DIRECTORS:
NOES: DIRECTORS:
ABSENT: DIP, ECTORS:
.Iune Greek, Secretary/City Clerk
BXHIBITA
PRO~X~T SUMMARY
TEVIECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
On July 1, 1994, Municipal Financial Services was retained by the City of Temecula to
prepare tile Annual Levy Rq)o~ for the Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) for the
Fiscal Year 1995/1996. Pursuant to the Community Services District Law, Division 3 of Title
6 of the Government Code of the State of California, commencing with Section 61000 et se~_.,
the TCSD has the power to levy and collect special rates and c~ in order W carry on its
operations and to pwvide the services and facilities furnished by it.
The levy and collection of the special rates and char~es is accomplished by the
assignment of benefit to each parcel within a specific service level. A Service Level is a defined
area that pwvides a specific service, operation and maintenance and/or proflare to only those
parcels contained within that service level.
The TCSD is currently composed of six (6) city-wide senrice levels. The descriptions
of the service levels are as follows:
Community Services. Paric~ and Recreation. Operations, mnintenance, and
adminim-ation of the City community park systems, recreation facilities, services
and programs.
Service Level A - Arterial Street T,i~hts and Median Maintenance.
Operations, maintenance, utility costs, and admini.m~tion of all arterial street
fights, medians and Waffic signals.
,~rice I ~-vel B - Resid~ntiol Street ! ~fhts. Operations, malntcnancc, utility
costs and administration of all rosidt~tial street lights.
Service l,,*vel C - Perimeter I=ndscapinp nnd Siope Mmint~nnnce. Operations,
maintenance, utility costs, improvements, and adminl.ql'ation for all perimeter
landscaping and slope mninW, nance areas maintained by the TCSD.
Service Level D - Rduse Collection. Ret3,elinf, rand Strmet SweQpinf.
Operations, and admini.mation Of the x~se and n~ycling program, and street
sweeping services for all single family residential homes.
Service T~.vel R - Streets and Roads. Construction, installation, and
maintenance of streets and wads.
The Financial Analysis contained heroin conthins each Se~ice Level including with their totals
for Fiscal Year 1995/1996 year to be as follows:
Community Services/Pa~:
Service Level A
Service Level B
Servic~ Level C
Service Level D
Service Level R
TOTAL TCSD LEVY FY 9~/96
Service l ,~vel I ~ Budget
$/SFR
$2,611,856.00 $68.88
157,586.00 4.16
244,170.00 26.92
475,390.00 Variable
1,808,867.00 172.06
19,398.00 Variable
$5,317,267.00
The Levy and Collection amounts for all non-exempt parcels within the TCSD for the Fiscal
Year 1995/96 are as shown on the Assessment Roll on file with the City Clerk.
RESOLUTION NO. CSD
A RESOLUTION OF Tv~, BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ~
TEMIF~"'ULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
~ING ~ PROCEDURES FOR APPEALING ~
APPLICATION OR ~ATION OF RATES AND
CHARGES AGAINST PROPERTY WITH IN ~
TEIVIICULA COIVIIVIU!m,WrY SERVICES DISTRICT
WHKREA~, upon incorporation of the City of Temecula, C~lifomia (the "City")
effective December 1, 1989, voters approved the formation of the Temecula Community
Services District (the "TCSD"), which has the same area boundaries as the City and whose
Board of Directors (the "Board*) consists of the members of the City Council of the City; and ·
WI4m:ulrAS, the TCSD has annually, adopted rates and charges for community
services and parks, recreation facilities, services and programs, operation, maintenance, sendces
and ~dmini.q~a~on of street lighting, slope m-'slntOnance, street lnain~, as well as the
inclusion of rates and charges for recycling and refuse programs for those areas specifically
benefitted thereby; and
WHmxrAS, the TCSD presen~y permits property owners to appeal the rates and
charges against their property on the basis that (1) the property owner disagrees with the grounds
for subjecting the propony owner's land to a rate and charge, (2) an error has been made in the
application or implementation of the rate or charge to the owner's propex~, or (3) such rate or
charge would cause financial hardship on the property owner; and
WHEREAS, the TCSD has pxepared and kept on file, procedures describing bow
property owners may file appeals.
NOW, Tm~EFORE, ~ BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ~ TINECULA
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT DOES ~nmEWy RFf~LVE, DETERMINE AND
ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The TCSD Board determines that it is in the best interest of the TCSD
and of the property owners within the TCSD, to provide an appeal procedure for certain matters
pertaining to the application of rates or charges imposed by the TCSD upon real property within
theDisUict.
Section 2. The TCSD Board hereby adopts the "Appeals Proc~ures for the
Tomecub Community Services District," in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A, and
incorporated herein by thig reference as though set forth in full.
Section 3. Resolution 93-03 of the TCSD, and all previous actions of the TCSD
establhhhg appea procedures, are hereby repealed.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOFrED this __
day of , 1995.
ATTEST:
Ronald Roberts, President
June S. Greek, Secretary
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALr!~ORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss
CrrYOFTEIVlK'IXA )
I, June S. Greek, Secretary of the Temecuh Community Services District, ]IRmRRy DO
CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution CSD 95- was duly adopted at a regular meeting
Of the Board of Dilcctors of Tcmecula Community Services ~ on the __ day of
, 1995, by the following roll call vote:
AYP_,S: DIRECTORS:
NOBS: DIRBCTORS:
ABSENT: DIRBCTORS:
June S. Greek, Secretary
m:xH,I1T A
APPEALS PROCEDURES FOR Tmr~
~ COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
(REVISED MAY 9, 199~)
1. Ai?peal of Classification or Correction of lr~rors
Where a piol~:ty owner (including an individual, or business entity) subject to
the rate or charge (1) questions the classification or application of any fiscal year's rate or
charge to that property owner's property, or C2) clzlims that an error has be~ made with ~.
to the application or implementation of the hue or clmrge to the pmpexty owner's propexty, that
property owner shall utiliz~ the ~ procedur~ $e~ forth I~low as ~ exchsive procedure
for ap~_~ling such jsmes and correc~g e~iors.
(a) The property owner shall file a written appeal in the form established for
the Temecula Community Services District (the "TCSD") Secrem~, stating in detail the reasons
why the property owner seeks a review of the classification of the property owner' s property for
the fiscal year or the facts and cimxmsmnc~ surrounding the error in the application or
implementation of the rate or chnrge to the owner's property. The statement shall include the
parcel number, proof of owne~hip, and any other information the property owner believes to
be relevant w the appeal. At the same time that each property owner subject to the rates and
charges is notified of the time, place and location of the public hearing rega/fiing the levy of
rates and charges for a particular fiscal year, such property owners shall also be notified of the
appeals deadline.
Co) The last day to file an appeal shall be December 1 of the fiscal year in
which the rate or charge is levied, or the next succeeding business day ff December 1 is a
weekend day or holiday; pwvided, however, that if an appeal is filed after July 31, the property
owner shall reimburse the City for any County Assessor's fees associated with amenaing the
(c) The TCSD General Manager, or his assignee, shall review the written
appeal. The General Manager or his designee my request, in writing, that the property owner
provide any additional information needed to make a decision. The General Manager or his
assignee shall make a determirmtion whether to grant such appeal within thirty (30) days of
receipt of the completed statement, including all necessary information. The General Manager,
or his assignee, shall give the property owner written notice of such determinntion of the appeal.
(d) In the event the property owner disagrees with the General Manager's or
his assignee's determination, the property owner shall have ten (10) days from the date of the
General Manager's written determination to appeal that determination to the Temecula
Community Services District Board of Directors (the "TCSD Board"). The property owner shall
f'~e a written request for reconsideration with the TCSD Secretary, containing the information
set out in subsection (a) and the reason for requesting reconsideration within the ten (10) day
period.
(e) Upon the receipt of a timely appeal, the TCSD Secretary shall phce the
matter on the agenda for the next regularly scheduled TCSD meeting occurring not less than
seven (7) days from recent of the appeal. The TCSD Board shall review the written statement
and General Manager's or his designee's determination and the TCSD Board shall determine,
based upon the materials before it, whether the appeal should'be granted. The TCSD Board's
decision shnll be provided to the property owner in writing within 15 days of the TCSD Board' s
determination. The decision of the TCSD Board shall be final.
(f) In granting such an appeal based on the classification or application of any
fiscal year's rate or charge to the owner's property, the General M~naSer, his designee and the
TCSD Board sbsll consider: (i) whether the property in whole or in part is used for the purpose
intended for that classification; (li) whether the classification adequately reflects the service
received; (iii) whether the rate or charge levied on vacant property exceeds the rate or charge
if the property where developed to its highest and best use; and (iv) whether unique or special
circumstances of that property or land use regulations affecting it support a modification of the
classification. In granting an appeal, the General Manager, his designee and the TCSD Board
may reclassify the property, in whole or in pan, may grant a refund (without interest) of all or
a portion of the rate or charge paid for any fiscal year and will determine for what period of
time the relief granted shall be in effect.
2. Appeal for Hardship
Where an individual property owner subject to payment of the rate or charge
believes that payment of all or perdon of the rate or charge would create a hardship for that
property owner during that fiscal year, the property owner may utilize the following procedures.
A hardship appeal must be renewed annually unless otherwise specifically determined by the
TCSD Board.
(a) The property owner shall ~c a written statement with the TCSD Secretary
stating in detafl the reason the property owner needs such relid. The statement shall include
the parcel number, proof of ownership, and any relevant proof of hardship. The statement must
be submitted W the TCSD Secretary by the deadline set by the TCSD. At the same time that
each property owner subject W the rates and charges is notified of the time, phce and location
of the public hearing regarding the levy of rates and charges to a particular fiscal year, such
property owner shall also be no~fie~ of the deadline for filing hardship appeals.
(b) The last day to file an appeal sbnll be December 1 of the fiscal year in
which the rate or charge is levied, or the next succeeding business day if December 1 is a
weekend day or holiday; provided, however, that if an appeal is filed after July 31, the property
owner shall reimburse the City for any County Assessor's fees associated with amending the
property tax statement.
(c) The General Manager or his designee shall act on such statement in the
same manner as set forth in Section l(b) and the Genenl Manager's or his designee's
determination may be appealed as set forth in Section l(d) and (e).
(d) In grating a hardship appeal, the General Manager, hi .~ designee and the
TCSD Board shall consider whether payment of the rate or charge during that fisc~ year would
adversely impact the property owner's ability to provide for the basic necessities of life. The
General Manager, his designee and the TCSD Board shnll determine to grant such hardship-
appeal on a case-by-case basis by providing for the defen-al of any rate or charge to a subsequent
fiscal year.
-MFS
CITY OF
TEMECULA
PRELIMINARY ANNUAL LEVY REPORT
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
FISCAL YEAR 1995/1996
SUBMITTED APRIL 24,1995
MUNI FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
Corporate0fWce
28765 Single Oak Drive, Suite 200
Temecule, CA 92590
Tel: (909) 699.3990
Fax:. (909) 699-3460
Orange County Office
150 El Camino Real, Suite 120
Tustin, CA 92680
Tel: (714) 665-2220
Fax: (714) 665-2230
San Franc/aco Office
3727 Buchanan. Suite 202
San Francisco. CA 94123
Tel: (415) 441-3550
Fax:. (415) 441-1401
:MFS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. OVERVIEW ...............................................................................................................
A. Introduction .................................................................................................1
B. Description of the District and Service~ ..................................................~2
C. Budget and Levy Summary ........................................................................3
II. DESCRIPTION OF THE DISTRICT ..........................................................................4
III. CHANGES TO THE DISTRICT ...............................................................................7
A. Modifications of the District Structure .......................................................7
B. Annexations .................................................................................................7
C. District Budget Changes .............................................................................8:
IV. DISTRICT BUDGETS .............................................................................................9
V. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT. ...........................................................................11
APPENDIX A - LAND USE/EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNIT~ ................................14
APPENDIX B - 1995/96 COLLECTION ROLl_ ...........................................................15
All
Inl~oduc'don
The Temecula Community Services District (District) was formed in 1989 upon
incorporation of the City of Temecula (City), to continue services previously
provided by the County of Riverside (County). The boundan/of the District is
coterminous with the City boundan/, and includes all taxable parcels within the
City. The District collects special rates and charges in order to provide services
and maintain the improvements within the District. The District was formed, and
the rates and charges were set and established pursuant to Community Services
District Law 61000, Section 61621, Title 6, Diw~ion 3 of the California
Government Code (the Code).
This Annual Levy Report (Report) describes the proposed rates and charges for
Fiscal Year 1995/96 based on the historicel and estimated cost to provide
services, and maintain improvements, that provide a benefit to properties within
the DistdcL Each parcel charged receives direct benefit from the services
provided to that parcel by the District. "
The word "parcel,' for the purposes of this Report, refers to an individual property
assigned its own Assessment Number by the Riverside County Assessors Office.
The Riverside County Auditor/Controller uses Assessment Numbers and specific
Fund Numbers, to identify on the tax roll, properties charged for special district
benefits.
A Public Headng will be held before the Distdct Board of Directors (Board). to
allow the public an opportunity to hear and be heard regarding the District.
Following the Public Headng, the Board may order modffications to the Report or
confirm the Report as submitted. After approval of the Report, as submitted or as
modffied, the Board thereby approves and confirms the Rates and Charges
(Charges) for Fiscal Year 1995196, and shall order the levy and collection of
Charges. In either case, the levy information will be submitted to the Riverside
County Auditor/Controller to be included as Charges on the property tax roll for
Fiscal Year 1995196.
MFS
Description of the District and Service
The District provides certain services, and the maintenance of specific
improvements within public rights-of-way and dedicated landscape easements
throughout the City.
The District consists of six (6) separate Service Levels, providing specffic
services and benefit to parcels within certain areas throughout the City. Each
parcel within the District is grouped within two (2) or more Service Levels based
upon its location, and the quantity and type of services provided within that area.
Each Service Level has diffedng costs depending upon the vadous services and
improvements provided. All parcels identified within a Service Level, share in
both the cost and the benefits of the services. The costs associated with the
Services, are equitably spread between all benefiting parcels within that Service
Level. Each parcel is charged its fair share of the costs of the services in
propoffion to the estimated benefit received. The Service Levels are identified as
follows:
· Community Service, Parks and Recreation
· Artedal Street Lighting and Medians
· Residential Street Lighting
· Local Landscaping and Slopes
· Citywide Recycling and Refuse
· Road Improvement and'Maintenance
Services and improvements provided include the construction and maintenance
of community parks, recreation programs, street lighting, median landscape
maintenance, pedrneter landscape maintenance, slope protection, a recycling and
refuse collection program, and road improvement construction and maintenance.
gMFS
C. Budget and Levy Summary
Table I below, provides a comparison of levy information for the vadous Service
Levels within the District, comparing Fiscal Year 1995/96 to the previous Fiscal
Year.
TABLE I
SERVICE LEVELS
155,358 4.18 157,586 4.1l (0.02) 37,916.58
216.158 26.30 244,170, 26.92 0.02 9,075
14,717
I
40210 40.00 57,316 4L00 O.00 1,240 1,246
104,308 89.00 94,516 8100 O.00 1,062 1,062
113,796 116.00 1352.56 11L00 0.00 1,155 1,166
169,400 175.00 188,300 118.00 0.00 1,076 1,0/6
0 0.00 14,765 157.08 157.58 94.00 124
$0 SO.O0 $4,633 121.92 S121 .g2 38.00 58
Note: Due to rounding, the Total Levy Units (shown in this table) mumplied by the Cherge Per Unit me/be
different from lhe Totai Levy Budget.
Each Service Level provides different services, and is comprised of differing types
of parcels. The 'Total Levy Units" and the resulting "Charge Per Levy Unit'
(shown in Table I), reflects a method of apportionment that most fairly proportions
the costs of the services to the benefit received by the parcels in that Service
Level. For Community Services, Parks and Recreation, and Service Level A, levy
units am calculated using a per Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). The'Total Levy
Units' for Service Levels B, C, and. D is based on a per parcel count. For Service
Level R, leW units am based on a Parcel Development Unit (PDU), which is
similar to a per parcel count, but makes a distinction between developed and
undeveloped parcels. Rates and charges will be collected in Service Level R for
the first time in Fiscal Year 1995/96. For a morn complete description of the
methods used for calculating the 'Total Levy Units" used for each Service Level,
please refer to (Section V), Method of Apportionment and Appendix A.
MFS
He
DESCRIPTION OF THE DISTRICT
Community Service, Parks, and RecreaUon provides a benefit to all parcels
within the District and includes maintenance, service, and operations of all public
parks in the District. Most park construction is provided either by developers as a
condition of their residential projects or development impact fees. This Service
Level also allows for the construction of the Community Recreation Center and its
debt service. In addition, this Service Level provides funding for the vadous
recreation programs throughout the City. The following is a list of some of the
City's parks and recreation facilities:
· Rancho Califomia Sports Park
· Sam Hicks Monument Park
· Veterans Park
· Bahia Vista Park
· Temecula Middle School Fields
· Old Town Temecula Senior Center
· Kent Hindergardt Memodal Park
· Temecula ElementaW School Pool
· Butterfield Stage Park
· Temecula Community Recreation Center
Paloma Del Sol Park
Loma Unda Park
Riverton Park
John Magee Park
Pala Community Park
Voorburg Park
Nakayama Park
Nicolas Road Park
Calle Aragon Park
Service Level A, Arterial Street !.ighUng and Medians provides a benefit to all
parcels within the District and City through the servicing, operation, and
maintenance of street lighting and landscaped medians along artedal streets.
Service Level B, Residential Street Lighting provide a benefit to all single
family residential and vacant parcels within those tram requiring servicing,
operation, and maintenance of local street lighting.
*MFS
Service Level C, Perimeter Landscaping and Slopes provides the servicing,
operation, and maintenance of perimeter landscaped areas and slopes within the
public dght of way and dedicated easements within certain tram. The level of
maintenance required within these tram vades depending on operating costs and
therafom, four (4) rate levels have been established.
Table II shows a listing of the tram in each of the four (4) rate levels within
Service Level C (Local Landscaping and Slopes.)
TABLE II
Service Level C Tracts
28861.,02 vW~,~r.a.~.~Cg!i~ 20130-00 2271501 W. LAGEMO~ 21672-01
~ 20130-04 22718-02 2187300
22593..02 21340-~ 22915.-02 2187401
THE vee'YAm~ 2087g-(X} 2134003 22915-03 2167402
21340-05 22916-01 21875.00
2134008 2291e-02 21875-01
I 2134007 2187502
v__-~__-,'_~:.a, _e~__efmy 21581-00 21875.03
21875-08
Service Level D, Citywide Recycling and Street Sweeping provides for the
operation and administration of the refuse and recycling program and street
sweeping services for all single family residential homes within the District.
Service Level R, Roads provides funding for construction, improvement, service
and maintenance of public streets and roads throughout the City. The services
provided may include, but are not limited to: renovation or restoration due to
damage; flood and drainage control; repairs and re-grading; and upgrades of the
existing areas as required for unpaved roads. Service Level R was added to the
Distdct in Fiscal Year 1993194. All parcels identified within Service Level R, share
in both the cost and the beneffus of the services provided. The costs associated
with the services, are equitably spread between all benefiting parcels within
vadous areas (rate levels) of the Service Level. Each parcel is charged its fair
share of the costs of the services in proportion to the estimated benefit received.
In Fiscal Year 1995/96, two (2) areas of the City and the parcels in those areas
have been added to Service Level R. The level of maintenance required within
these two (2) areas vades due to operating costs and therefore, separate rate
levels have been established. Only the parcels within each of the two (2)
boundary areas will be charged for the costs associated with servicing and
maintaining the roads and streets in the area.
Rate Level R-1 The parcels within this rate level consists of one hundred twenty-
four (124) parcels that have direct access to roads or streets that are serviced
and maintained through the District. This rate level provides funding for servicing
and maintenance of: Nicolas Road; Greenwood Lane; I.iefer Road; Gatiin Road;
Pala Vista; Calle Girasol; Aussie Road; Calle Chapos; Walcott Road; and Tommy
Lane. A total of 3.196 miles of roads are serviced and maintained in this area.
Rate Level R-2 The parcels within this rate level consists of fifty-nine (59)
parcels that have direct access to roads or streets that are serviced and
maintained through the District. This rate level provides funding for servicing and
maintenance of: Ormsby Road; Santiago Road; Lolita Road; and John Wamer
Road. A total of 1.003 miles of roads are serviced and maintained in this area.
6 ~
gMFS
CHANGES TO THE DISTRICT
For Fiscal Year 1995196, changes within the District that affect the levy are
outlined below.
Modifications of the District Structure
Modifications to the District structure, if any, could include, but are not limited to:
changes in the types of services provided; addition of new services or Service
Levels; restructudng of the current Service Levels; or revisions in the method of
apportionment. No changes are anticipated to the Distdct structure for this Fiscal
Year.
Two (2) project areas (rate levels) are being added to Service Level R for Fiscal
Year 1995/96. The new rate levels within Service Level R will provide funding for
the servicing and maintenance of unpaved roads. Only. the parcels within each
of the two (2) boundary areas will be charged for the costs associated with
servicing and maintaining the roads and streets in the area.
Annexations
Annexations to Service Level C (Local Landscaping and Slopes), are the parcels
within:
· Rate level #1 -Tract 22762-00 (Rancho Highlands).
· Rata level fr2 - Tract 22148-00 (Moralson Homes).
· Rate level # 3 - Tracts 2291.6-00, 22916-01 and 22916-02 (Vintage Hills)
· Rate level # 4 - Tracts 21675-00 (Village Grove);
Tract 25004-01 (Barclay Estates).
Annexations to Service Level B (Residential Street Lighting), are the parcels
within Tracts:
22762-00 23125-01 24133-00
22916-03 23483-00 24135-00
23100-03 24131-01 24135-02
23101-02 24131-02
Additionally, 1,805 parcels have been added to Service Level D for the 1995196
Fiscal Year.
Annexations to Service Level R (Roads) includes:
· One hundred twenty-four (124) parcels to rate level #1
· Fifty-nine (59) parcels to rate level #2
No other annexations are planned to any of the other Service Levels or to the
District for Fiscal Year 1995/96.
District Budget Change
The Community Services, Parks and Recreation Service Level rates have
increased due to the operations and maintenance costs of the Temecula
Community Recreation Center, and the Old Town Ternecula Senior Center, as
well as expansion and improvements to several neighborhood and community
parks. Operations and energy costs for Service Levels A (Arterial Street Lights)
has increased over the previous year. HoWever, the increased cost has been off-
set by an increase in the EDU count for the Service Level. In Service Level B
(Residential Street Lighting), the number of parcels receiving benefit has
increased, but due to increased energy costs, there will be a small increase to the
rate per parcel. Service Level D (Recycling and Refuse), has increased due to an
increase in the Consumer Pdce Index (CPI).
8 ~
DISTRICT BUDGETS
Table III on the next two (2) pages shows the District budget for Fiscal Year
TABLE III
1995/96 DISTRICT BUDGET
Temecula Community Services District
1995196.
Operating Budget Department Summan/for the Year Ending June 30, 1996
Ammmt CommmlW LmIIA lawliB LevdC ~ LemiD , I..mllR- TelEl/-
Smmm ~ WeBm 5100 S?t518 15,781 15,515 53,~r3 17,310 0 ei, lo5
I)ekned Comeenmlim 5101 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PERS i 5102 8~.066 2.513 2,78~ 5,828 0 0
SilmtJ4av~i~q,,._~t 5103 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
~ FICA 5104 8285 242 288 i 0 0 5,6&4
A~I Aimmine ........ 5103 2400 0 0 0 0 0 2.400
U~ . ~_ ~,, .,. _.~t Training Tm sloe 5,082 129 287' 445 0 0 5,B43
0iBlilN imamms Sl10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pat-The (Pmie~ 511e 2m,~4 0 0 15,830 0 0 305,M4
/ (Promrural 8e/vimB) 81,088,4~0 ~22,455 127.8e6 1e0,888 817.310 10 $1.244.T/6
Ternram knme (C4kml 5208 4,500 0 0 0 0 0 4,500
Ilmm,&MmtoFBiillm 5212 123,500 0 0 4/,888 0 0 177,388
Rmmr&Mmt.43EmEclmmet 5211 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
laemlmmmBulNMe 5218 0 SO0 0 0 0 0 500
Ollm 84411m 5220 15,000 0 0 0 0 0 15,000
7,'--~,v 5222 33,000 0 0 0 0 0 33,0(30
Ptlllmmm 522B ~00 0 0 0 0 0 500
PeeegeenclPemeeng S230 9.S00 0 0 0 0 0
eem-Fealllee 5234 3J22 0 0 0 0 0 3,522
Nel-~ 5238 15,~0 0 0 0 0 0 15,000
Eealaeee Leme 523e 2.000 0 0 0 0 0 2.000
Ullill 5~40 2/7,15) 5,000 0 88.048 O O 3/1.103
teeltmeTeamem 5242 5,000 ~00 0 0 0 0
Uedlmem S243 rul00 0 0 0 0 0
Signe 5244 10.000 0 0 0 0 0
Leee 8emee 52,m 20.0110 0 0 0 0 0 20.000
OleroeaemSev,ze 5250 56.200 0 0 20.000 0 0 /5.200
Aemeial 52~4 4.(x30 0 0 0 5,000 0
let/NIMime 5288 e.0130 0 0 0 0 0
Cemeemee 5258 1./00 0 0 0 0 0
lemlemimelMeemF 510 2.000 0 0 0 0 0 2.10
SlleTr '...~- "~ 5281 5,0QO 0 0 0 0 0
lleeee 5282 3.000 0 0 0 0 0
Fuel i / ~283 7.000 1,000 0 0 0 o 5,oQo
Cmmil Dlemeiemy ~E/ S,O00 0 0 0 0 0
Blmmtnm S2Ba 500 0 0 0 0 0 ~1)
Sueemel {5200'1) 1843.2/2 S10.000 10 $1S3.911 IS.0CO 10 1812.113
gMFS
TABLE III
1995/96 DISTRICT BUDGET
Temecula Community Services District
Operating Budget Department Summary for the Year Ending June 30, 1996
"""' I':1 :1:i :1 :1:1'
~ ~ ~301194. 1N,4~8
WIll HIMling ~315 1.838. 1.838.44/
Seeel.~ s~e o ~ ~,,xem-' o ~ u ~
e ~ ~,~ 0 0 0 0 0
/ I t~1~ 0 '0 0 0 0
~ ~ ~ ~t~ 0 0 0 0 0
~; ~ ~ 17.~ 0 0 0 0 0 17.G
Fi I ~ 0 0 0 0 0
e ~ ~ ~G 0 o o o o
/~Vm~ ~-.~ ~S 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
~a ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
~ (~e) ~ St~ ~ ~ Sl .~ ~ ~t4
OemrExpedluae SI)O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Oeeltf~ Tmnllem Out 8901 51]~41S 0 0 0 0 0 902.415
SUBTOTAL (Olmr F, xlmedilum8) 9802.41S
Oeae F~ewemgs ~01 1.000 0 0 0 0 0 1.000
O~ke Etl/eltent 5802 1.000 0 0 0 0 0 1
eme 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Equemel 9810 4.500 0 0 0 0 0 4.i30
Cle -Peiec~ S804 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SUBTOTN. (Ce,~ Oemy)
Telml ~ ~ ~3.Cl2,1.544 S174.2~ 1287,89~ l.~4,148 $1.88~/S/
Ble!NBTUR!I
RESERVEFORCONTliGENCY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL. DISTRICT C06'TS 3.02,4,544 174.255 2s'/.ee~ 554.148 1.88o./5/ lt3ee
TOT~LI)IPIIIITtMll 3,024,~4 174.25~ 2B/.m M,4,7~ 1.IO./'S7
~ i SOtJRCE~ 314.404 ~ 3.000 2~IIX) 22.310 0
FUNO BALANCE m~84 10.378 20./2S 51.11 21JIB O ZI0.32S
BN.jUiCE TO LEVY 2.611.81~ 1S/.18 244.1/0 4/S.310 1.801.1/ 11.1 S.311.3r/
113TAL R!VlBIUee 3.024.S44 174.2~ 28/.816 S~4.741 1.110./S7 lt311 S. B01.BIT
MFS
V. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT
As in past years, the cost to provide services within the District will be fairly distributed
among each assessable property based upon the estimated beneft received by each
property. The benefit formula used is based upon the Service Level, the land use and
size of a property.
For Service Level Community Services, Parks, and Recreation, and Service Level A:
Artedal Street LighUng and Medians, each property is assigned an Equivalent Dwelling
Unit (EDU) factor that reflects the property's land use and degree of benefit. For Service
Levels. (B-Residential Street Lighting; C-Local Landscaping and Slopes; and D-
Recycling and Refuse), the rates and charges am based on a per parcel basis. In
Service Level R (Roads) each property is assigned a Parcel Development Unit (PDU)
factor that reflects both parcel count and whether the parcel is developed.
The following is the formula used to calculate each property's District charges by EDU.
Please refer to Appendix A for a complete listing of land use codes and their associated
EDU.
Service Levels: Community Services, Parks and Recreation; A - Arterial Street Lighting and
Medians:
Parcel EDU X Acres or Units X Charge per EDU = Parcel Charge
The following is the formula used to calculate each pmperty's District charges by the per
parcel method.
Service Levels: B - Residential Street Lighting; C - Local Landscaping and Slopes; and
D - Citywide Recycling and Refuse:
Total Balance to Levy / Total Parcels in Service Level = Parcel Charge
The Rate Per Levy Unit for Service Level R is based on a Parcel Development Unit
(PDU), which is similar to a per parcel charge, but makes a distinction between
developed and undeveloped parcels.
Service Levels: B - Roads
Parcel Development Units = 1.0 for Developed parcel and 0.5 for undeveloped parcels
Total Balance to Levy ! Total Parcel PDU in rate Level = Parcel Charge
g MFS
Table IV shown on the next two pages, reflects the levy calculations for vadous property
types for each Service Level.
TABLE N
PARCEL CHARGE CALCULATIONS FOR
COMMUNITY SERVICES, PARKS, AND RECREATION
Single Family Residential 1.00 $68.88 $68.88 Per Unit
Multi Family ResidenlMI 0.75 68.88 51.66 Per Unit
Agricultural 0.50 68.88 34.44 Per Acre
Single Family Vacant 2.00 68.88 137.76 Per Acre
Non-Residential Vacant 4.00 68.88 275.52 Per Acre
Non-Residential Improved 6.00 508.88 $413.28 Per Acre
PARCEL CHARGE CALCULATIONS FOR
SERVICE LEVEL A
Single Family ResidentiN 1.00 $4.16 $4.16 Per Unit
Multi Family Residential 0.75 4.16 3.12 Per Unit
Agricultural 0.50 4.16 2.08 Per Ace
Single Family Vacant 2.00 4.16 8.32 Per Acre
Non-ResidentiBi Vacant 4.00 4.16 16.64 Per Acre
Non-Relentiai Improved 6.00 $4.16 $24.96 Per Acre
PARCEL CHARGE CALCULATIONS FOR
SERVICE LEVEL B
Single Family ResidE, stial
Single Family Vacant
-' ': Unit-".X'perPm'cel~="~ C~:
1,00 $26.92 $26,92 Per Pwael
1.00 $26,92 $26,92 Per Parcel
TABLE IV
PARCEL CHARGE CALCULATIONS FOR
SERVICE LEVEL C
Property Type
Single Family Residential Rate C-1
Single Family Residential Rate C-2
Single Family Residential Rate C-3
single Frohey e..e~enu.~ Rre C4
Parcel Charge=
Unit X perPercelr-e
1.00 $46.00
1.00 89.00
1.00 116.00
I , .O0 I S, 75.00 I
Citmfge- ' ~. Multlplle~..-
$48.00 Per Parcel
89.00 Per Parcel
116.00 Per Pmrcei
$ 7s.ool .erpa. I
PARCEL CHARGE CALCULATIONS FOR
SERVICE LEVEL D
Single Family Residential ' 1.00
X pef-~;- = .. 'Charge -;Multiplier, ·
$172.06 $172.06 Per Parcel
PARCEL CHARGE CALCULATIONS FOR
SERVICE LEVEL R
Single Flmily Relklent~ Rite R-1
Single Family Vacant Rate R-1
Single Family Re~derfdal Rate R-2
Single Family Vacant R.me....R-2
1.00 $157.08 I
0.50 157.08
I ~ .oo I ,=~ .- I
i o.,o I s,2, .,~ I
$157.08 Perlaln~ I
78.54 Per Parc~
121.92 I Per Parcel
MFS
Appendix A - LAND USE/EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS
:.,.~:" ~-:'" Property. Type-
Single Family Residential
Multi Family Residential
Agricultural
Single Family Vacant
Non-Residential Vacant
Non-Residential Improved
1995196.
Equi~'alent: '- ........
Dwelling:Units .MUltipliec -'
1.00 Units
0.75 Units
0.50 Acres
2.00 Acres
4.00 Acres
6.00 Acres
.MFS
Appendix B - 1995/96 COLLECTION ROLL
Parcel identification, for each lot or parcel within the District, shall be the parcel as
shown on the County Assessor"s map for the year in which this report is
prepared.
Non-assessable lots or parcels include govemment owned land. public utility
owned property, and land principally encumbered with public rights-of-way.
A listing of parcels within this District, along with the charges, has been submitted
to the City Clerk and, by reference. is made part of this report.
ITEM 3
APPROV
CITY ATTORNERPYR~~
FINANCE OFFIC
CITY MANAGE
,. \
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
Board of Directors
FROM:
Ronald E. Bradley, General Manager
DATE: May 9, 1995
SUBJECT:
Naming of Park and Recreation Facilities
PREPARED BY: ~ 4~ Beryl Yasinosky, Management Assistant
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors:
Consider, and if desired, approve the names for two (2) quarter-acre park sites, two (2) three-
acre neighborhood park sites, and a twenty (20) acre community park site.
BACKGROUND: Pursuant to City policy, it is the responsibility of the Community
Services Commission to forward recommendations concerning the naming of City park and
recreation facilities to the Board of Directors for · final decision. On April 10, 1995, the
Community Services Commission recommended that the following names are considered by
the Board of Directors for several park facilities that will be completed in the near future.
The Commission recommends that in consideration of Temecula's initial Sister City
relationships, the names "Voorburg Park" and 'Nakayama Park" be considered for the two (2)
quarter-acre park sites on Nicolas Road. One of the parks is nearing completion, and it is
anticipated that the other park will begin construction within the next few months.
The name "Nicolas Road Park" is recommended for the three (3) acre neighborhood perk
currently under construction at the northwest corner of Nicolas Road and North General
Kearny Road. The Commission also recommends that the name "Butterfield Stage Park" be
considered for the three (3) acre neighborhood park currently under construction on De Portola
Road, east of Butterfield Stage Road.
While the aformentioned parks are being constructed by the developers, · future twenty (20)
acre community park will be designed and constructed by the City of Temecula. Located on
the south side of Margarita Road, the site is just west of the Temecula Elementary School.
The Commission recommends that this facility is named "Margarita Community Park".
According to the existing naming policy, the Board of Directors may approve the park names,
as recommended by the Community Services Commission, or may consider any other names
desired.
FISCAL IMPACT:
ATTACHMENTS:
None.
1.
2.
3.
Location Maps.
Community Services Commission Staff Report
dated 4/10/95.
Resolution No. CSD 92-08: Naming Parks and
Recreation Facilities.
r:.~ymbo~r.~msqk.md N2s~5
U~'OU U3.1, ~
I
STR£F-'~
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
Community Services Commission
Shawn D. Nelson, Director of Community Services
April 10, 1995
Naming of Park and Recreation Facilities
PREPARED BY: {b~ Beryl Yasinosky, Management Assistant
RECOMMENDATION: That the Community Services Commission:
Approve names to be recommended to the Board of Directors for two (2), quarter-acre park
sites, two (2), three-acre neighborhood park sites, and a twenty (20) acre community park
site.
BACKGROUND: Pursuant to City policy, it is the responsibility of the Community
Services Commission to forward recommendations to the Board of Directors concerning the
naming of each park and recreation facility operated by the City of Temecula. Due to several
facilities that will be completed in the near future, it is recommended to address the official
names of these park sites so proper signage can be approved as part of the development
process and familiarity with the parks can be established within the community.
The quarter-acre park sites are located on the north side of Nicolas Road, just south of the
Santa Gertrudis Creek. One park site is within Van Daele's Tract No. 22627-0 and the other
is within Lyon's Communities' Tract No. 22627-1. Staff has received recommendations that
the following names be considered in honor of Temecula's initial Sister City relationships:
1. Voorburg Park
2. Nakayama Park
One of the three (3) acre park sites is located on the northwest corner of Nicolas Road and
North General Kearny Road· The park is being constructed by Coscan-Davidson pursuant to
the conditions for Tract No. 27827. The following names have been recommended:
2.
3.
4.
Roripaugh Park
Nicolas Road Park
Summerfield park
Santa Gertrudis Creek Park
04.1095
r.~ymlmobk'~mmapk. s
The remaining three (3) acre park site is located on the north side of De Portola Road, east of'
Butterfield Stage Road. The park is being constructed by Kaufman & Broad pursuant to the
conditions of approval for Tract No. 23125. The following names have been recommended:
1. Butterfield Stage Park
2. Stagecoach Park
3. De Portola Park
4. Woodland Park
5. Cottonwood Park
6. Elderberry Park
7. Washana Park
The twenty (20) acre community park site is owned by the City. Located on the south side
of Margarita Road, the future park is just west of Temecula Elementary School. The following
names have been recommended:
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Margarita Community Park
Arrowhead Park
Town Center Park
Louis Wolf Park
Temeku Park
Misty Valley Park
The Community Services Commission may consider the above names or any other names
desired for these park sites. Also attached for your review is an additional list of
recommendations from the community regarding possible names for City parks.
FISCAL IMPACT:
ATTACHMENTS:
None,
List of Additional Park Names.
Resolution No. CSD 92-08: Naming Parks and Recreation
Facilities.
LIST OF NAME RECOMMENDATIONS FOR
FUTURE CITY OF TEMECULA PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES
1. Palomino Park 12.
2. Cutting Horse Park 13.
3. Wild Horse Park 14.
4. Bronco Park 15.
5. Cattle Drive Park 16.
6. Vaqueros Park 17.
7. Wagon Wheel Park 18.
8. Fort Temecuia Park 19.
9. Old West Park 20.
10. Rodeo Ranch Park 21.
11. Indian Park 22.
Eagle Park
Eagle Ranch Park
Vineyard Park
Granite Park
Wolfe Valley Park
Bear Mountain Park
Rainbow Canyon Park
Ponderosa Park
Recreation Park
Earle Stanley Gardner Park
Vail Ranch Park
c~mo~k~ac
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 92-08
A RESOLLrHON OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF ~ TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES
DISTRIC~ ADOPTING A POLICY FOR NAMING
PARKS AND RECREATION FACILITIES
WHEREAS, on April:23, 1991, the Board of Directors (the "Board") adopwxl apolicy
for naming parks and recreation facilities; and
Wltt;REAS, the Community Services District and the Parks and Recreation Commission
requests that the aforementioned policy be adopted by resolution;
NOW, Tl:n~~, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA.
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT DOES HEREBY, RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND
ORDER AS FOIJ~)WS:
Section 1. That the policy for naming parks and recreation facilities as set forth on
Exhibit "A' is adopted establishing a uniform policy and procedure that identifies criteria for
the naming of parks and recreation facilities.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOFrED this 8th day of September, 1992.
Ronald J. Parks, President
ATTEST:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEM~CULA )
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, Fr~I:RY DO CERTIFY that the
foregoing Eesolution No. CSD 92-08 was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council
of the City of Temecula on the 8th day of September 1992 by the following roll call vote.
AYES: 5 DIRECrOP, S:
Birdsall, Moore, Lindemans, Mu~oz
Parks,
NOES: 0 DIRECTORS: None
ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None
un '~~.~~-~ ~)
e S. Greek, Zlerk
EXhibit "A"
TEEdECULA CONSVIUNITY SERVICES DISTR/CT
Naming 'Parks and Recreation Facilities
PURPOSE
To establish a uniform policy and procedure
criteria for the naming of parks and recreation
that idanti~ies
facilities.
POLICY
The Park and Recreation Commission will be responsible for the
selection of names for parks and recreation facilities- Once a
name is selected, it will be forwarded to the Board of Directors
for ratification- Staff will be responsible for encouraging
citizens and community organizations to suggest possible names that
will then be forwarded to the Commission for consideration-
At a minimum, each park and community building will be designated
a name. Naming of specific areas within a park (garden, swimming
pool, lake,. ballfield, etc.) is acceptable but should be kept to a
minimum to avoid confusion. No park shall-be given a name which
might be perceived as controversial by the community- All names
selected shall be acceptable and meaningful tO a majority of the
neighborhood/community where the park or recreation facility is
located.
Priority in naming sites shall be given to geographical locations,
historic significance or geologic features. No park shall'be named
for a person, except where an individual has made a si~ificant
financial contribution toward the acquisition and/or development of
the perk or facility or has been an outstanding long-time
community leader who ~as suppor%ed open space and recreational
activities-
All park and recreation facilities will be designated a formal name
within six months of acquisition or construction- All parks shall
have an entrance sign. Buildings will have an entrance sign and a
plaque inside the facility for m~me identification-
The. name of a park or recreation facility may be changed'onlY after
a hearing is held by the Commission to receive community input and
direction. No name shall be changed unless there is significant
justification and suppor~ by the community-
RESPONSIBI]' ITY
Depar'cment
Parks and
Recreation
Commission
Department
ACTION
Acquires a new park or recreation
facility,
Solicits possible names from community.
Forwards suggested names to the Parks and
Recreation Commission for consideration.
Receives any additional community input.
Selects a name for
recreation facility,
ForWards name to
ratification-
Installs the appropriate
plaque,
the new park or
City Council for
naming sign or
REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY
ITEM 1
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
TUESDAY, APRIL 11, 1995
A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency was called to order at
9:08 PM at the Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula,
California. Chairperson Ronald J. Parks presiding.
PRESENT: 5 AGENCY MEMBERS:
Lindemans, Mu~oz, Roberts,
Stone, Parks
ABSENT: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None
Also present were City Manager Ronald E. Bradley, General Counsel Peter Thorson and
City Clerk June S. Greek
PUBLIC COMMENT
None given.
RDA CONSENT CALENDAR
I Minutes
1.1 Approve the minutes of February 28, 1995.
1.2 Approve the minutes of March 14, 1995.
It was moved by Agency Member Stone, seconded by Agency Member Roberts to
approve Consent Calendar Item No. 1 with a correction on 1.2, showing Agency
Member Roberts absent. The motion was unanimously carried.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'$ REPORT
None given.
AGENCY MEMBER'$ REPORTS
None given.
r:~ninutes.rda\041195 1 5/1/95
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Agency Member Stone, seconded by Agency Member Roberts to adjourn
at 9:09 PM to a Joint City Council, RDA, Planning Commission Meeting, Rancho California
Water District Board Room, 42135 Winchester Road, Temecula, CA. The motion was
unanimously carried.
Next Regular Meeting: April 25, 1995, 8:00 PM, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula,
California.
Ronald J. Parks, Chairperson
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk/Agency Secretary
r:\minutes.rda~041195 2 511/95
MINUTES OF A JOINT MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL/TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
AND THE TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION
HELD APRIL 19, 1995
A joint meeting of the Temecula City Council, Redevelopment Agency and the Temecula
Planning Commission was called to order in the Board Room of the Rancho California Water
District at 7:04 PM, Mayor Jeffrey E. Stone presiding.
PRESENT 4
ABSENT: 1
PRESENT: 4
ABSENT: I
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
Mufioz, Parks, Roberrs, Stone
Lindemans
Fahey, Ford, Slavin, Webster
Blair
Also present were City Manager Ronald E. Bradley, City Attorney Peter Thorsen, Planning
Director Gary Thornhill and City Clerk June S. Greek.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The audience was led in the Pledge of Allegiance by Commission Chairman Steve Ford.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no public comments offered.
COUNCIL/COMMISSION REPORTS _
Councilmember Parks requested the members of the audience, commission and council
observe a moment of silent prayer for the victims of the Oklahoma City bombing
tragedy.
Councilmember Roberrs reported briefly on the on-going efforts to place traffic directors
at the Winchester/Jefferson intersection and Winchester overpass,
COUNCIL CONSENT CALENDAR
Substitute-Public Improvement Aoreement in Parcel Moo No. 71383
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Roberts to
approve the following staff recommendations:
R:~4inutes%O41995 -1 -
April 19, 1995
City Council Minute
1.1
Approve the substitute agreement for completion of street improvements in
Parcel Map No. 21383.
1.2
Authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement and the City Clerk to so attest
and have recorded.
1.3 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Surety.
The motion was unanimously carried with Mayor Pro Tam Lindemans absent.
CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY/PLANNING COMMISSION BUSINESS
Status and Information Report on the Prooosed Old Town Redevelooment Project and
Performina Arts District
The joint meeting of the Council, Agency and Commission was called to order by
Agency Chairperson Ronald J. Parks. Agency Member Stone announced he would
step down due to a potential conflict of interest.
Planning Director Gary Thornhill introduced the staff report and outlined the matters to
be covered during the workshop.
Assistant Planner Matthew Fagin presented the Westside Specific Plan and the Master
Conditional Use Permit for the Old Town Entertainment Project.
Councilmember Mufioz questioned if the Master Conditional Use Permit is limited to the
number of uses listed in the staff report. Planner Fagin responded that any additional
uses would require anoth~r~onditional Use Permit. Councilmember Mui~oz stated he
objects to any high density residential in Area D of the Westside Specific Ran.
Commissioner Webster asked if the architectural style proposed for the residential in
Planning Area D will be compatible with that of the Hotel and Neighborhood
Commercial Center. Planning Director Thornhill stated the architectural style would be
required to be compatible at the time plans are submitted.
Principal Engineer Ray Casey addressed the traffic conditions projected by the City's
traffic consultant. He advised that all intersections will be at equal or better levels of
service, at build-out, compared to currently existing conditions. He also stated that
one-half of the intersections show an improvement at build-out over the present level
of service. Mr. Casey also outlined the locations of the proposed parking facilities.
Commissioner Slavin asked if the use of parking structures versus parking lots had
been explored. Engineer Casey responded that staff analysis showed this is not an
economically viable solution
R:%Minutes%041995
-2-
05/02/95
City Coun~q Minute April 19. 1995
Councilmember Roberrs asked when the realignment of Front Street and the possible
realignment of Pujol Street would be addressed with the City Council. Mr, Casey
stated this could be done during the preliminary design phase,
Councilmember Perks questioned the timing of the Murrieta Creek Channel
improvements. Mr. Casey advised that the project does not have a responsibility to
improve the creek to its ultimate solution.
Councilmember Parks also questioned when the loop ramps at the I-15 and Highway
79 South intersection will be completed. Mr. Casey responded that this is projected
to be completed by the year 2010.
Councilmember Muf~oz asked if the land owners in the proposed Benefit Assessment.
District have been polled to determine their willingness to participate in the Western
Bypass Parkway Assessment District. City Manager Bradley stated he was unable to
respond regarding all of the possible owners.
Associate Planner David Hogan presented the General Plan and Specific Plan
Consistency and the Environmental Impact Report.
Tom Dodson, the consultant who prepared the Environmental Impact Report, pointed
out the comparable acreage between the General Plan and the Westside Specific Plan.
Pat Fay, 31235 Calle Felicidad, spoke in favor of local contractors having the
opportunity to be trained in how to bid on sub-contracts with Fluor Daniel. He
recommended the City hold classes to show local contractors how to submit pre-bid
qualifications, etc,
Commissioner Slavin clarified that the City could act as a facilitator but would not fund
such a training program.
Commissioner Fahey discussed the need for the Planning Commission to be aware of
the Council/Agency members goals and how they would like to have the Commission
proceed with this project.
Counciimember Mur~oz said he would like the commission to look at Planning Area D
of the Westside Specific Plan relative to the density designation. He also indicated he
would like them to address his concern on the impact high density residential will have
on the escarpment. He further stated he wants to insure the limits on the permitted
uses in the Master Conditional Use Permit are established as the upper limits allowed
for Old Town. Lastly, he said he feels the Highway 79 South and I-15 circulation and
impacts of the improvements should be looked at as they will affect the southerly end
of the City end neighboring communities.
Commissioner Slavin expressed concerns with the parking needs of the project and
stated she would like to see further consideration of the use of parking structures.
Chairman Ford asked to have a breakdown of the dollars available to spend for parking
R:~Vlinutee%041995 -3- 06/02/9S
Auffi 19. 1995
City Council Minmes
structures at the present time and those that would be available to spend at 8 later
date.
Councilmember Robarts said he feels Planning Area D should be carefully studied as
to the density issue and asked staff to keep the Council and Commission updated
regarding possible realignments of Front and Pujol Streets. He also expressed concern
that the signal and ramp widening at I-15 and Highway 79-South be completed prior
to opening of the project. :
Councilmember Parks asked that the Agency and the Planning Commission have an
open mind with regard to Area D and allow review of suggested designs before ruling
out possible developments solely on the basis of density. He also suggested the
development of Area D may result in tradeoffs which could expedite construction of:
the Bridge over Murrieta Creek. Member Parks also shared in the concerns regarding
timing of the I-15/Highway 79-South intersection signalization and ramp widening and
agreed that some structural paring should be considered for the Old Town project.
Commissioner Webster expressed concern that the area designated Tourist Retail may
compete with the existing businesses located in Old Town. He further expressed a
desire to assure the architectural styles of the Wild West Arena and the Hotel Complex
are aesthetically compatible with the escarpment.
Commissioner Fahey asked that the Council/Agency let the Planning Commission know
how they should be communicating with the Council/Agency during the development
of the project.
Commissioner Slavin stated she is concerned that the publicized opening date not drive
the project and stressed that attention to quality should be the driving force.
Planning Director Thornhill;in response to a question from Counciimember Mu~ioz,
stated the Master Conditional Use Permit is only for the project as proposed. He said
staff is working on an ordinance that will restrict future entertainment facilities in the
Old Town area.
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Chairman Ford, seconded by Commissioner Slavin to adjourn to the
next regularly scheduled meeting of the Planning Commission to be held May 1, 1995
at the Rancho California Water District Board Room. The motion was unanimously
carried.
It was moved by Councilmember Roberts, seconded by Councilmember MuRoz to
adjourn to the meeting of April 25, 1995 to be held at the Community Recreation
Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California.
R:~Vinutes~,O41995
05/02/95
Ciw Council Minute Aoril 19, 1995
CITY MANAGER REPORTS
No report given.
CITY ATTORNEY REPORTS
No report given.
ATTEST:
Ronald J. Parks, Chairman
Temecula Redevelopment Agency
June S. Greek, CMC
City Clerk/Agency Secretary
R:~linutes%041995
05/O2/95
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
HELD APRIL 25, 1995
A regular meeting of the Temecula Redevelopment Agency was called to order at 8:24 PM
at the Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California.
PRESENT: 5
AGENCY MEMBERS:
Lindemans, Mu~oz, Roberrs,
Stone, Parks
ABSENT: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None
Also present were Executive Director Ronald E. Bradley, General Counsel Peter Thorson
and Deputy City Clerk Susan W. Jones.
PUBLIC COMMENT:
None given.
CONSENT CALENDAR
It was moved by Agency Member Stone, seconded by Agency Member Lindemans to
approve Consent Calendar Item 1. The motion was unanimously carried.
I Minutes
1.1 Approve the minutes of March 28, 1995.
AGENCY BUSINESS
2 Selection of Fluor Daniel for Construction Manaoement Services
Agency Member Stone stepped down from the dais due to a conflict of interest.
Executive Director Ron Bradley presented the staff report.
Agency Member Lindemans questioned item number 2 in the report regarding the
project approach consisting of a total infrastructure cost of $11,641,615,which
includes the Western Bypass for $4,797,000; will this money come from the
assessment district?
Executive Director Bradley confirmed it will come from the assessment district.
Minutee.rde%042595 -1 - 4/25/95
Agency Member Parks discussed the estimated funding required and the building
facade program in the amount of $200,000; there is concern with giving Fluor
Daniel, Inc. an exclusive for the facade improvements, as some of the individual
owners may want to do their own facades; he questionned if this is possible with
this agreement.
Executive Director Bradley explained that it is, as the facade improvement is a very
small part of the overall public improvements, and the City wanted to be sure that
consistency is maintained between all of the documents released regarding the Old
Town Entertainment Project and the public improvements.
Agency Member Parks stated since many times the sewer and water improvements
are handled by the utility companies end not by the City; there is no need to pay a
construction management fee for something handled by another agency.
Executive Director Bradley explained that if the City is not paying for the
construction through a contract, they will not be managing it.
Tom Shimmin of Fluor Daniel, Inc. stated that they are set-up to serve purely as an
extension of City staff; they will represent the City and will be doing just what they
are directed to do; they bring in the experts and people to manage the contracts,
and the fees are based accordingly on the percentage that they do.
Executive Director Bradley stated that at the time the City gets into negotiations, it
will determine that amount, which will come back to Council for final approval. He
explained a suggestion was made by a citizen that the City provide training to local
subcontractors to work with Fluor Daniel; this concept has been discussed with Mr.
Shimmin and with the Economic Development Corporation, and both agreed that
this program would be viable, valuable and have agreed to participate.
Frank Dizovia, also representing Fluor Daniel, Inc., explained that it is very
customary for Fluor Daniel to hold job fairs on public works projects to introduce the
community and the contractors to the project, how it is going to be broken down,
what type of contractors they are looking for and how the bids are going to be
assembled.
It was moved by Agency Member Lindemans, seconded by Agency Member Roberts
to approve staff recommendation as follows:
2.1
Authorize the City Manager to initiate negotiations with Fluor Daniel, Inc. for
construction management services in connection with the construction of
public improvements to serve the Old Town Entertainment Project.
IVinutee.rda~42595 -2- 4125/95
The motion was carried by the following vote:
3
AYES:
4 AGENCY MEMBERS:
Lindemans, Mu~oz, Parks, Roberrs
NOES:
0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None
ABSTAIN: I
AGENCY MEMBERS: Stone
Home Fundino Reauests
Agency Member Stone removed himself from the dais due to a conflict of interest.
Senior Planner John Meyer presented the staff report.
It was moved by Agency Member Lindemans, seconded by Agency Member Robarts
to approve staff recommendations as follows:
3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 95-02
A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA HEREBY AUTHORIZES THE SUBMITTAL OF AN APPLICATION
TO THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE COUNTY OF
RIVERSIDE FOR FUNDING UNDER THE HOME INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIPS
PROGRAM FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION OF 12 UNITS; THE EXECUTION OF A
STANDARD AGREEMENT IF SELECTED FOR SUCH FUNDING AND ANY
AMENDMENTS THERETO; AND ANY RELATED DOCUMENTS NECESSARY
TO PARTICIPATE IN HOME INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIPS PROGRAM
3.2 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 95-03
A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA HEREBY AUTHORIZES THE SUBMITTAL OF AN APPLICATION
TO THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE COUNTY OF
RIVERSIDE FOR FUNDING UNDER THE HOME INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIPS
PROGRAM FOR ACQUISITION OF 150 UNITS; THE EXECUTION OF A
STANDARD AGREEMENT IF SELECTED FOR SUCH FUNDING AND ANY
AMENDMENTS THERETO; AND ANY RELATED DOCUMENTS NECESSARY
TO PARTICIPATE IN THE HOME INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIPS PROGRAM
Minutee.rde%042595 -,3- 4125/95
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 4
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 0
ABSTAIN: I
AGENCY MEMBERS:
AGENCY MEMBERS:
AGENCY MEMBERS:
AGENCY MEMBERS:
Lindemans, Muftoz, Parks, Roberrs
None
None
Stone
4 Facade Imorovement and Non Conformina Sion Removal Prooram
Agency Member Stone removed himself from the dais due to a conflict of interest.
Senior Planner John Meyer presented the staff report.
Agency Member Robarts questioned the signs per building/business, some of which
are leased; asking if there is a time limit on how long they could stay, if they put a
new sign up and a rebate is granted.
Senior Planner Meyer explained that a provision has been included in the contract -'
that discourages, particularly in terms of building improvements, someone using this
for speculative purposes. There is a provision in the Facade Improvement Program
portion that, if they do that within five Wars after getting the rebate, they have to
pay the rebate back in full. If a new business comes in, they are required to put in
e conforming sign with no rebate.
Director of Planning Thornhill clarified that a business owner could use the facade
improvement money technically to put up a conforming sign.
Agency Member Parks asked about a situation where you have one sign advertising
several businesses, is that one sign eligible for the rebate program? Can the
business owner of the shopping center get a rebate on that sign, and the individual
businesses could also get rebates on the signs on their businesses?
Senior Planner Meyer stated the City would consider that as a sign advertising the
center; it would have to be determined if it is a conforming sign, and in many cases
in Old Town they may not be. The answer to the second question is they may lose
the free-standing sign, but they would be compensated by some assistance with the
sign on the building.
Agency Member Parks asked if there is an appeal process with the program.
Senior Planner Meyer, with concurrence of the General Counsel, stated there is no
appeal process; this would require administrative approval, which is appealable to
the Planning Commission.
Minutes.rda~42595 -4- 4/25/~5
5
General Counsel Thorson reiterated there are standard enforcement procedures that
staff would follow, if a business chooses not to comply.
It was moved by Agency Member Lindemans, seconded by Agency Member Mufioz
to approve staff recommendation as follows:
4.1 Approve the Facade Improvement Rebate Program.
4.2 Authorize staff to implement the Facade Improvement and Non-conforming
Sign Removal Program
4.3 Appropriate ~40,000 from redevelopment bond proceeds for FY94-95 for the
Non-conforming Sign Removal Program.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 4 AGENCY MEMBERS: Lindemans, Muf~oz, Parks, Robarts
NOES: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None
ABSTAIN: 1 AGENCY MEMBERS: Stone
Agency Member Muf~oz was excused from the meeting at 8:47 PM.
Certificate of Conformance - Tower Plaza (PA95-0027)
Director of Planning Gary Thornhill presented the staff report.
It was moved by Agency Member Lindemans, seconded by Agency Member Stone
to approve staff recommendations as follows:
5.1
5.2
Approve the Certificate of Conformance for the Tower Plaza Center.
Authorize the Chairperson to sign the Certificate and the City Clerk/Agency
Secretary to Attest and Record same.
The motion was carried as follows:
AYES: 4 AGENCY MEMBERS: Lindemans, Parks, Robarts, Stone
NOES: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: I AGENCY MEMBERS: Muf~oz
Minutes .rde%042595 -5- 4/25/95
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
None given.
AGENCY MEMBER'S REPORTS
Agency Member Stone agreed with Agency Member Lindemans that there needs to
be some cohesivenasa and unity on the projects that Council wants to accomplish
in the City. He questionned if there has been any new, updated information
regarding funding that the City may be able to obtain and divert to other needy -'
projects in the City.
Director of Public Works Kicak said explorations of funding sources are constantly
going on.
Agency Member Stone asked if staff could follow-up by contacting Senator Haynes,
requesting expediency in finding some funds, if they exist, so that the City can
lobby to get funds to help with the State highway.
Executive Director Bradley asked Assistant City Manager McLarney to report to the
Agency regarding their recent visit in Sacramento with the staff consultant to the
Appropriations body of the Transportation Committee.
Assistant City Manager McLamey explained that she met with the consultant to the
Appropriations Committee, referred by Senator Bruce Thompson, and was informed
that the City's project is not in the State Transportation Improvement Program yet.
The City's Director of Public Works is working to have it added to the program,
since it cannot be considered for State funding until it is in the STIP.
In answer to Agency Member Stone's question as to what that entails, Director of
Public Works Kicak explained that it is an application, considered by the California
Transportation Commission, which is eventually placed on a priority list by them.
Placement on the STIP, however, does not guarantee anything in the near future.
In answer to Agency Member Stone's question, Executive Director Bradley
explained that this entails much more than just an application; STIP is a five-year
Transportation Improvement Program, and each year the projects that are identified
in the STIP compete for available funding. He said the City needs to get on that list
first to become eligible.
Assistant City Manager McLarney added that in talking to the consultant regarding
Prop. 111 funds, all of those funds, approximately ~3,000,O00,000,have been
allocated for seismic retrofitting of bridges throughout the State, therefore, no Prop.
111 money is available at this time for any of the City's projects.
Agency Member Stone confirmed that Council will be addressing their priorities with
respect to capital improvements and the upcoming CIP in June.
Minutee.rde%042595 -6- 4126/95
Agency Member Robarts reiterated that his top priority is the duck pond, which is a
one-shot opportunity that will not come up again.
Agency Member Lindemans requested a workshop with staff regarding priorities end
funding projects.
Agency Member Parks explained that this is one of the reasons the City has a CIP, a
five-year plan, which is reviewed every year, and this is scheduled for June 2.
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Agency Member Stone, seconded by Agency Member Roberts to adjourn
at 8:58 PM to a meeting on May 9, 1995, 8:00 PM, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula,
California. The motion was unanimously carried, with Agency Member Muftoz absent.
Ronald J. Parks, Chairperson
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk/Agency Secretary
Minutes.rda%042595 -7- 4125/95
ITEM 2
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER '~
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Redevelopment Agency Board Members
Ronald E. Bradley, Executive Director
May 9, 1995
Consideration of Sponsorship for the All Women's Rodeo
Prepared by: Mary Jane McLarney
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Redevelopment Agency consider sponsoring the All Women's Rodeo hosted by Pro
Rodeo Sports Company of Temecula Valley to be held at Galway Downs on May 20 and 21,
1995.
BACKGROUND:
Pro Rodeo Sports Company of Temecula Valley is hosting the All Women's Rodeo at Galway
Downs Equestrian Center on May 20 and 21, 1995 at 2:00 p.m. It will air on Prime Time for
a one (1) hour program; approximately 45 million people will view this rodeo across the United
States, Canada and Mexico. We have been approached by Pro Rodeo Sports to take part in
a sponsorship. They have requested a $10,000sponsorship; based on the type of event and
media coverage, a $2,500 sponsorship would be appropriate.
FISCAL IMPACT:
$2500 is available in the Redevelopment Agency Economic Development Budget.
Attachment: All Women's Rodeo Information Packet
of Temecula Valley
For Immediate Kelease
PRSC OF TEMECULA VALLEY TO HOST CHAMPIONSHIP RODEO
CTemccula, CA), Bucking Broncs, wildly spinning bulls, the best ropers, :barrel
racers, clowns... everything that goes into the rich history of our American Hcdtagc.
Right now you arc probably thinking about a Rodeo, and naturally Cowboys.
Cowboys ropin', ridin' and competing against man & beast for the best times or the
best rides just like they do almost every weekend somewhere within a short drive of
your home.
Well, I am talking about a rodeo, but I'm talking about a rodeo the likes of which
haven't been seen in Southern Cnlifomia in some 23 years. A rodeo so spectacular
that the top riders, topers-and barrel racers across the US will be making their way
to one of the most beautiful places in s,,nny Southern California.
You see, the West was not won by man alone, and men arc not the only ones who
can tame a wild bull or 'rope like the wind'! Men and women together, working side
by side, hand in hand, leamed to survive the very rugged conditions encountered in
their quest for a better way of life. Out of this straggle for survival has evolved the
professional rodeo we know today.
The Pro Rodeo Sports Company of Tcmccnla Valley is proud to present the first
Professional Women's Rodeo Association ('PWRA) All Women's Rodeo since 1973,
in Southern California. This prestigious event will be held at Galway Downs
Equestrian Center, May 20 and 21, 1995. In front of an expected 9,000 spectators,
top wonicn professionals from across the United States will compete for prize
money exceeding an already guaranteed $6,000.00 in six (6) traditional rodeo
events.
This exciting rodeo action will take place in. the most beautiful valley of Temecula
surrounded by snow capped mountains and rolling hills, green valleys and lush
award winning wineries. A family vacation destination, one hour north of San
Dicgo's Sea World and the world famous San Diego Zoo, an hour west of Pahn
· Springs, 45 minutes from DisneyLand or Knottsherry Farm and just 90 minutes
southeast of Los Angeles, Tcmecula is one of the best kept secrets in Southern
California.
43500 Ridge Park Dr. · Suite 201 · Temecula, C,¢L 92590 · (POP) 699-8895. Fax (909) 699-9954
PI O I ODEO SPOi TS CO.
of Temecula Valley
PWRA ALL WOMEN'S
PRO RODEO CLASSIC
May 20 & 21, 1995 2:00pm
Galway Downs Equestrian Center
Temecula, CA
,
$6,000 Added Purse +
Bona Allan All Around Saddle
Award Design Buckles, Bee Wild Jackets,
Professional Choice & Annie Oakley Gift Certificates
to event winners and All Around
To be Televised on Pdme Time Sports Network (PTSN)
Overnight Horee Facility Available (909) 6764545
ALL CONTESTANTS invited to a Sponsor Appreciation Night at
Callaway Vineyard & Winery in Temecula- May 18th
Rodeo Entry Office (909) 695-5022
Entry Office Opens May 10 - 8:00am PST
Entry Office Closes May 11 - 4:00pm PST ~,~,,~
Judges: Bill Bames/Melissa Phillips
A),!,, ~ ~'°''
PRIME TIME SPORTS NETWORK
Prime Time Sports Network has apprcudmately 45 million viewers nationwide.
Th~ following is the, dollar valuo of a thirty (30) s~ond spot on Prime Time Sports Network
TIME OF AIRING
8:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m.
12:00 p.m. - 6:00 p.m.
6:00 p.m. - 10:00 pan.
10:00 p.m. - 12.'00 a.m.
COST