The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About040594 CC AgendaAGI:NDA TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL A REGULAR MEETING COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER - 30875 RANCHO VISTA ROAD APRIL 5, 1994- 7:00 PM EXECUTIVE SESSION: 5:30 PM, Closed Seamion of the City Council pursuant to 1. Govemment Code § 94956.8 Conference with Red Property NegoTiaTor - Under negotiaTion: Sr. Canter Parking lot property located at 4945 Sixth Street. The negotiating parties are Kenper Real Estate Management Co. and the City of Temecula. Under NegotiaTion: Purchase Pdce. 2. Government Code § 94956.9(c) Conference with Legal Counsel - potential litigation: Tort Claim for $32,393, filed by the City against the ImmigraTion end NaturalizaTion Service, for the coat of emergency services and counse~ng as a result of the June 2, 1992 Border Patrol accident. 3. Govemment Code § 54957 - To discuss Public Employee Appointment: Status report on City Manager Recruitment end review of City Attorney Services Agreement At approximately 9:45 PM, the City Council will determine which of the remaining agenda items can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00 PM and may continue all other items on which additional time is required until a future meeting. All meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 PM. CALL TO ORDER: Invocation: Flag Salute: ROLL CALL: PRESENTATIONS/ PROCLAMATIONS Next in Order: Ordinance: No. 94-12 Resolution: No. 94-33 Mayor Ron Roberrs presiding Reverend Joan Rich Egea, Church of Religious Science Councilmember Birdsall Birdsall, Muftoz, Parks, Stone, Rotarts Day of the Young Child R:%AOende~0406i4 I PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Council on items that are not listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council on an item not listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink 'Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other egenda items s "Request to Speak' form must be filed with the City Clerk before the Council gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made at this time. A total, not to exceed, ten (10) minutes will be devoted to these reports. CONSENT CALENDAR NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless members of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. I Standard Ordinance Adootion Procedure RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve the minutes of February 28, 1994. R:t, Agende~O4Or~4 ,~ 3 Resolution Aoorovina List of Demands RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Adopt a resolution emitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A 4 6 7 8 City Treasurer's Reoort RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Receive and file the City Treasurer's Report as of February 28, 1994. Exoenditure of Asset Forfeiture Funds RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Authorize staff to use police asset forfeiture funds to purchase computer equipment. Final Tract Mao No. 27690 RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Approve Final Tract Map No. 27690 subject to the Conditions of Approval. Employee Assistance Proaram (EAP) RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 Authorize staff to solicit a Request for Proposal (RFP) from qualified firms experienced in Employee Assistance Programs (EAP). Council OOOOSitiOn tO AB 3167 and H.R. 3636 RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 Authorize the Mayor to sign letters in opposition to Assembly Bill 3167 (Epple) and House of Representatives Bill 3636 (Markey/Fields). SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 9 Ordinance No. 94-10 RECOMMENDATION: Read by title only and adopt an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 94-10 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING CHAPTER 2.08 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE REQUIRING THAT THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTIONS OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA BE HELD ON THE FIRST TUESDAY AFTER THE FIRST MONDAY OF NOVEMBER IN EACH ODD-NUMBERED YEAR 10 Ordinance No. 94-11 RECOMMENDATION: 10. 1 Read by title only and adopt an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 94-11 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING CHAPTER 2.04 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO THE TIME AND PLACE OF CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS PUBLIC HEARINGS Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing. 11 Proposed Resolution Regardino Charitable. Relioious and Commercial Solicitation RECOMMENDATION: 11.1 Continue the public hearing until the meeting of April 26, 1994. R:%AOende%O4OgM 4 12 Ordinance Amending Land Use Code Reaardina Plot Plans. Conditional Use Permits and Public Use Permits (Continued from the meeting of 4~8~94) RECOMMENDATION: 12.1 Read by title only and introduce an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 94- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE LAND USE CODE REGARDING THE TERM OF PLOT PLANS, CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS, AND PUBLIC USE PERMITS 12.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE LAND USE CODE REGARDING THE TERM OF PLOT PLANS, CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS, AND PUBLIC USE PERMITS 13 Ordinance to Reduce Water Consumption Through Efficient Landscaoe Desian. Consistent with Provisions of AB 325 RECOMMENDATION: 13.1 Continue the public hearing to the meeting of April 26, 1994. COUNCIL BUSINESS 14 Procedures and Recommendations for Notice of Public Hearina RECOMMENDATIONS: 14.1 Provide direction to staff regarding the implementation of Notice of Public Hearing Procedures. 15 16 Community Service Funding Recommendation RECOMMENDATION: 15.1 Review and approve or revise recommendations in response to the applications received from community based organizations; 15.2 Only consider requests from community based organizations once each year in connection with this process. Private Bus Benches in Public Right of Wav (Requested by Councilmember Muf~oz) RECOMMENDATION: 16.1 Provide direction to staff regarding the placing of benches in the public right-of-way. 17 Status Ragerr on Winchester Interchange. Overland Bridae. Winchester/Nicolas Signalization. Right Turn Lane at Pala Road/Highway 79 South. and Margarita Road Widening North of Rancho California Road RECOMMENDATION: 17.1 Receive and file the Status Report on Winchester Interchange, Overland Bridge, Winchester/Nicolas Signalization, and Right Turn Lane at Pala Road/Highway 79 South. 18 19 Owl Rock Products. Wilson Creek Mine - Owl Rock Sand and Gravel Surface Mining geeration in the Aguanoa Area RECOMMENDATION: 18.1 Receive and file report. Soeed Undulatign Re-design - Calla Pina Colada RECOMMENDATION: 19.1 Increase the maximum height of speed undulations on Calle Pina Colada from two inches (2") to three inches (3"). 20 21 Mavor and Councilmembers Conference Bylaws (Requested by Mayor Pro Tam Stone) Status of Prooosed Downsizinp Ordinance RECOMMENDATION: 21.1 Receive and file status report on the preparation of the proposed downsizing ordinance. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT ADJOURNMENT Next meeting: April 7, 1994, 7:00 PM, Joint CityCouncil/Planning Commission Meeting, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. Next regular meeting: April 26, 1994, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California R:V~emle~44)~4 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING - (To be held at 8:00) CALL TO ORDER: President Jeffrey E. Stone ROLL CALL: DIRECTORS: Birdsall, Mufioz, Parks, Roberts, Stone PUBLIC COMMENT: Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors, should present a completed pink 'Request to Speak" to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address for the record. CONSENT CALENDAR Final Fee Credits for Paloma Del Sol Park RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve a final fee credit of ~ 1,025,349 for Kemper Community Development Company for the construction and dedication of Paloma Del Sol Park. PUBLIC HEARINGS Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before e public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing. Sam Hicks Monument Park Master Plan RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the Master Plan for Sam Hicks Monument Park; 1.2 Adopt the Negative Declaration for the project; 1.3 Authorize the preparation of construction documents and release a formal public bid for the project. R:'~a4eendeV340~14 I GENERAL MANAGERS REPORT - Bradley DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT - Nelson BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS ADJOURNMENT: Next meeting April 26, 1994, 8:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. R:%/4ende%040614 · CALL TO ORDER: ROLL CALL: PUBLIC COMMENT: AGENCY BUSINESS 1 2 3 Chairperson Ronald J. Parks presiding AGENCY MEMBERS: Birdsall, Mufioz, Roberts, Stone, Parks Anyone wishing to address the Agency, should present a completed pink "Request to Speak" to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address for the record. Resolution Authorizing Investment in the Local A.encv Investment Fund (LAIF) RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. RDA 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AUTHORIZING INVESTMENT OF DISTRICT MONIES IN THE LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND Authorization of Acareement for RDA Consulting Services RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve the terms of the agreement for RDA Consulting services with PMW Associates and authorize the Chairperson to execute the agreement, subject to the approval of the Executive Director and the General Counsel as to the final form of the agreement. Authorization of Aoreement for Develooment Advisory Services for the RDA RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Approve the terms of the agreement for Development Advisory Services with Price Waterhouse and authorize the Chairperson to execute the agreement, subject to the approval of the Executive Director and the General Counsel as to the final form of the agreement. R:V~mde~040~14 10 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT AGENCY MEMBER'S REPORTS ADJOURNMENT: Next Meeting: Temecula, California. April 26, 1994, 8:00 PM, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, R:%Aeendall4 11 PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS The City of Temecula PROCLAMATION W~, the Day of the Young Child is an annual celebration that focuses public attention on the needs of young children and their families; and WliERIA5, it is particularly important to target the need for. high'quality. early childhood programs; and WHEREAS, the National Association for the Education of Young Children'sponsors this annual celebration nationwide; and Wm~FAS, the City of Temecula will ~old its annual observance at the Temecula Elementary School on April 16th from 9:30 AM until 2:30 PM; and WItER~'AS, area preschools, public schools, P.T:A.' org~nirations and service groups will provide activities for children accompanied by a parent or adult to enjoy, such as food, balloons, games and free esltert~inment, NOW, THER~~, I, Ron Roberrs, on behalf of the City Council of the City of Temecula, hereby proclaim April 16, 1994 to be *DAY OF THE YOUNG IN ~ WIIIxEOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City. of Temecula to be affixed this 5th day of April, 1994. June S. Greek, City Clerk ITEM 1 ITEM NO. 2 MINUTES OF A SPECIAL MEETING HELD JOINTLY WITH THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL AND TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION MONDAY, FEBRUARY 28, 1994 A special meeting of the Temecula City Council and the Temecula Planning Commission was held on Monday, February 28, 1994, 7:00 P.M., at the Tsmecula City Hall, 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. The meeting was called to order by Mayor Ran Roberrs. Councilmember Munoz. PRESENT: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS:' Birdsall, Munoz, Parks, Stone, Robarts ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None PRESENT: 2 COMMISSIONERS: Fahey, Ford ABSENT: 3 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Hasgland, Salyer Also present were City Manager Ran Bradley, City Attorney Scott Fmld, City Clerk June S. Greek and Recording Secretary Gail Zigler. PRI:S;NTATIONSI PROCLAMATIONS None PUBLIC COMM;NT NONe CITY COUNCIL RFPORTS None- COUNCIL BUSINESS 1. Resolution of ADoointment - Interim City Mananer Ran Bradley advised the Council Section 2, Exhibit A of the Resolution is not attached and will be brought back for City Council approval at the next regular meeting. It was moved by Mayor Pro Tam Stone, seconded by Councilmember Parks to approve staff recommendation with the deletion of Section 2 of the resolution and direction that the letter of agreement with the City Manager be placed on a future' agenda. CC/PCMI~2/28/94 I 3/21 JOINT CITY COUNCILIPLANNINt4 COMMISSION MINUTI=S RECOMMENDATION: 1.1. FEBRUARY 28, 1994 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94-25 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPOINTING AN INTERIM CITY MANAGER 3.' Development Code Work Prooram Senior Planner John Meyer presented the staff report. He told the Council and the Commission an advisory committee has been meeting to work on the development codes and they are satisfied with the organization and contents of the draft code. Mr. Meyer said staff expects some issues to arise in the future regarding the County (msc) manufacturing service commercial zones. He said staff plans on holding several industrial area neighborhood meetings and advised that staff has held one such meeting and it became apperect there may be some resistance to elimination of the MSC district. Mr. Meyer explained to the Council the Business Park land use designation is the city's industrial and manufacturing land use designation which will be split into two districts: the Business Park district and the Light Industrial district. Councilmember Birdsall asked what will happen to those businesses that no longer fit in the Business Park zone. John Meyer explained there will legal non-conforming uses allowed within the district. He said after meeting with the property owners along Felix Valdez, which has been designated as an office professional district through the General Plan, it became apparent these property owners are not happy with the new designation and staff has agreed to ,re-evaluate the land use designation on their behalf. He said they expressed a desire to see no limitations to a single designation and they did not want to be designated office professional. Councilmember Munoz asked, should the Council and Commission agreed to allowing the legal non-conforming uses, what length of time would be allowed before there was conformance with ell designations of the districts. Mr. Meyer said the bulk would occur in approximately 3 to 5 years. Chairman Ford asked if a existing business could expand under the non-conforming use policy. John Meyer explained the decision of the committee was a business could continue to operate and/or sell the business and continue to operate under the non- CC/PC:MIN02/28/~4. 2 N21)~I. JOINT CITY COt q~ICILIPLANNINr4 COMMISSION MINUTFR F;:RRUARY .98, 1994 conforming use policy however, it could not expend or rebuild under the policy. Counciimember Munoz said he feels conforming uses should be achieved through natural attrition. City Attorney Scott Field explained there are a range of non-conforming use ordinances from the strict to the very lenient. Planning Director Gary Thornhill said the goal is to eliminate retail/commercial uses. He said staff can group the uses end if a use des not fit into the broad category then it would be · legal non-conforming use. The overall consensus of the Council and the Commission was to direct staff as follows: The goal is to eliminate, to the greatest extent possible, non-conforming USeS · Non-conforming uses are to eliminated generally through normal attrition. That the test for any replacements shall be "Is it an in-kind replacement". That the building permit will be used as a triggering mechanism for investigating if a non-conforming use is attempting to re-establish in the ZOne. To move forward with a process of narrowing the zone districts and not fall back to the MSC designation. Chairman Robarts declared a recess at 8:30 P.M. The meeting reconvened at 8:40 P.M. 2. Presentation and Discussion of Old Town Develooment Conceots Zev Buffman provided an update on the status of the Old Town Development Concept. He displayed conceptual drawings of the interior/exteriors of components of the project as follows: 600 Seat Cabaret Theatre 950 Seat Opera House Showboat Arena Virtual Reality Palace Mr. Buffman said there has been a great deal of interest in the project expressed by the entertainment industry. Councilmember Munoz asked Mr. Buffman what degree of financial commitment he is asking for. CC/FCMIN02/28/94 3 3/21/~4 JOINT CITY CnUNCIL/PLANNINr4 COMMISSION MINUTF~ FFBRUARY 99, 1994 Mr. Buffmen said the initial cap on the cost of the study was $250,000, which he would share equally with the City of Temecule. Commissioner Fahey asked if the committee who worked on the Old Town Specific Plan will be re-formed to work on the project. Planning Director Thornhill supported reactivating the group back together. It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Stone to instruct staff to place the funding of the recommended first phase (initiating special studies) at a cost of $250,000to be shared equally by the City and T.Z.B.G., Inc. on the agenda of March 8, 1994 as follows: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Munoz, Parks, Stone, Roberts NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Stone to re- activate the Old Town Specific Plan Steering Committee to serve as an advisory group to the City during the project development~ AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Munoz, Parks, Stone, Roberts NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None Adjournment It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Stone, seconded by Councilmember Munoz to adjourn at 10:05 P.M. ATTEST Mayor Ron Roberts June S. Greek ~02/28/94 4 3/21/94 ITEM NO. 3 RF~OLUTION NO. A RF.,.~LUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN ~Xlil~IT A TH~ CITY COUNCIL OF TH~ C1TY OF T]~IBCULA I~)ES RF.~0LV~, D~'~INB AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in ~hibit A have been audited by the City Manager, and that the same are hereby allowed in the amount of $~91,66130. Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this ~th day of April, 1994. ATTEST:' Ron Robere, Mayor June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] 13 I STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) crrY OF TEMECULA) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby do certi~ that the foregoing Resolution No. 94-- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City. Council of the City of Temecula on the 5th day of April, 1994 by the fortowing ron call vote: AYES: 0 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 COUNCK.MEMBERS: None COUNCILMEMBERS: None COUNCK.MEMBERS: None June S. Greek, City Clerk 13 2 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 03/25/94 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 04/05/94 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 03/24/04 TOTAL PAYROLI.~ TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 04/05/94 COUNCIL MEETING: DIBBUP, BEMENTS BY FUND: CHECKS: 001 GENERAL 1101 100 GAS TAX 143,438.9t 120 DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FUND t0.00 185 RDA-LOW/MOD 12.00 190 COMMUNITY SERVICE8 DISTRICT 148,484.08 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A S7,48e. t8 192 TCSD 8ERV1CE LEVEL B 1134.8g 193 TCBD SERVICE LEVEL C I19,336.~4 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 10.00 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ (CIP) liO,IB2.'18 250 TCSD-.CIP 12,088.00 280 RDA-.CIP 13,520,,3g 300 8ELFdNBURANCE 12,0/1 ~ VEHICLES 1800.41 INFORMATION8, SYSTEMS S25,373.45 ~ COPY CENTER 12,638.27 ~40 FACIUTIES $7,380.16 380 RDA-DEBT SERVICE 12.00 380 TCSD DEBT SERVICE $t31.778.81 PAYROLL: 001 GENERAL (PAYROLL) 121 ,e/4.eg 100 (3A8 TAX (PAYROLL) S~e,et2.81 190 TCSD (PAYROLL) S16,0e0.83 t91 TCBD SERVICE LEVEL A (PAYROLL) 1436.0e 192 TCBD SERVICE LEVEL B (PAYROLL) 652.47 lg3 TCBD SERVICE LEVEL C (PAYROLL) Sl ,71g.94 280 ROA-CIP 886.04 300 8ELF-INeAJRANCE (PAYROLL) 320 INFORMATION BY'STEM8 (PAYROLL) $1,214.48 330 COPY CENTER (PAYROLL) 1681 340 FACIUTIE8 tl, t 22.47 TOTAL BY PUND: MANAQE~rliY CERTIFY THAT FOLLOWINQ IS TRUE AND C0fM~CT. ~ E. BRADLEY. INTERIM CITY TI~E. Sl 77,509.43 1214,214.M 126,314.79 $101,822.42 $101,822.42 lBet ,861.50 VOUCHRE2 PAGE 8 03/~''~ 15:08 CITY OF TB4ECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOB ALL PERIODS FUm) 001 100 1~0 191 1~3 210 280 300 310 320 330 )~0 TITLE GENERAL FUND GAS TAX FUND CI3414UNITY SERVICES DISTRICT TCW) SERVICE LEVEL A TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C CAPITAL !IqPROVEHENT PROJ FUll) REDEVELOPIIENT AGENCY - CIP INSURANCE FUND VEHICLES FUND INFOBNATIQN SYSTEMS COPY CENTER FUND FACILITIES TOTAL NIXIT 46, 7&2.53 10,972.85 19,841 7,243.38 1,3~.99 87, Z88.96 370.57 286.10 132.71 2,&53.92 321.79 510.t6 177,509.4~ VOUCHRE~' 03/17/94 15:08 CITY OF TEHECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOIl ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 33~353 334353 33~353 33~353 33~353 33~353 334353 33~353 33~353 334353 33~353 334353 33~353 33~353 334353 334353 33~353 334353 33~353 392262 392262 392262 392262 392262 392262 392262 392262 392262 392262 392262 392262 392262 392262 392262 392262 392262 392262 392262 14131 14131 14131 14131 14131 14131 14132 14133 CHECK VENDOR VEI)OR DATE IllER MANE 03116/W, 0)/16/94 03/16/94 0)/16/94 0)/16/94 03116194/, 0)/16/W~ 0)/16/94 03/16/96 0)116/9~ 0)/16/9~ 03/16/94 03/16/96 0)11619~ 03/16/94/, 03/16/94/, 03/16/94 0)/16/94/, 03/16/94/, 03/16/9~. 03/16/944, 0)/16/94 03/16/9~ 0)/16/94 0)/16/94 03/16/94 03/16/94/, 03/16/9/, 03/16/94 03/16/94 03/16/94 0)/16/9~ 03/16/94 03/16/94 03/16/94 03/16/94 0)116194 03/16/94 0)/17/94. 03/17/94 0)/17/94 0)/17/94 0)117/94 03/17/94 000/~ FIRSTAX (EDD) 0004~ FIRSTAX (El)D) 000M~ FIRSTAX (El)D) 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 0004.~ FIRSTAX (EDD) OOO~ FIRSTAX (ED!)) O~ FIRSTAX (EDO) 0004~ FIRSTAX (EDD) OOO/:~' FIRSTAX (EDD) 00L~.~ FIRSTAX (EDD) 000~ FIRSTAX (El)D) 00L~ FIRSTAX (EDD) 00044~ FIRSTAX (EDD) O00~ FIRSTAX (EDD) O00,H~ FIRSTAX (EDD) 000(-~ FIRSTAX (EDD) ~ FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) ODO44Z, FIRSTAX (EDD) 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 00028~ FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 F]RSTAX (IRS) 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 00028~ FIRSTAX 00028~ FIRSTAX (]RS) 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FIRSTAX(IRS) 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FIRSTAX (]RS) 000283 FIRSTAX (]RS) 001222 001222 001222 001222 001222 001222 000102 001266 ALPHA CONNUNICATIONS, I ALPHA CONI4UN!CATIONS, I ALPHA COI414UNICATIONS, I ALPHA COIIJNICATIONS, I ALPHA COINUNICATIONS, l ALPHA CONHUNICATIONS, ANERICAN FENCE OD. OF C AHERICAN PLANNING ASSOC ITEH DESCRIPTION 000/,-~ EDI 000J~ STATE 000444. STATE 00Lv:z:/: STATE 000444. STATE 0004~ STATE 00044~ STATE 00044~ STATE 0004/~ STATE 0004.44 STATE 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 NEDICARE 000283 NEDICARE 000283 NED l CARE 000283 NED I CARE 000283 NED l CARE 000283 NED I CARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 NED I CARE 000283 NED l CARE 000283 liED I CARE PAGERS/TC$O PAGERS/B&S PAGERS/INFO. CTR. PAGERS/PW PAGERS/POLICE PAGERS/FIN FENCE RENTAL HOTEL/CONF. ACCOUNT NUliER 001-2070 · 100-2070 190-2070 191-2070 lf3-2070 280-20/0 300-2070 320-2070 ' 33o-Z070 :~0-2070 001-2070 100-2070 190-2070 191-2070 193-2070 280-2070 300-2070 320-2070 330-2070 001-2070 100-2070 190-2070 191-2070 193-2070 280-2070 3O0-2070 320-2070 330-2070 001-2070 100-2070 190-2070 191-2070 193-2070 280-2070 300-2070 320-2070 330-2070 340-2070 190-180-999-5238 001-162-999-52~8 320-199-999-5238 100-164.-999-5238 001-170-999-5242 001 - 14,0-999-5250 190-180-999-5238 001-161-999-5258 ITEN N4OUNT 1,056.70 290.61 261.01 7.66 27.47 14.20 9.16 24.25 10.25 11.09 2,167.47 714.13 482.35 20.96 29.51 55.29 15,71 8,738.36 2,949.02 2,239.58 82.55 2/,5 131 77.87 266.24 89.27 2,381.78 647.32 582.74 17.07 61.29 31 °68 20.42 54.00 22.86 24.74 110.00 33.00 11.00 18.33 145.00 125.00 CHECK ANOUNT 18,643.35 242.00 145.00 12r,--~ OV~/~JE~ 15:08 CITY OF TBiECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOG ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHEC.,I( VENDOR VIEII)OR ITEM NIJNBER DATE ~R IIAqE DESCltIPTIOG 14134 03/17/94 001346 AHERzCAN PLANNING .:.SS~C_~ MQRKSHOP/LB 14135 03117194 000747 APA/PLANNERS BOOKSTORE 14136 03/17/9/, OO1323 ARROMHEAD MATER 14137 0]/17/94 000?45 AT & T- CELLULAR 14137 03/17/9~ O00?45 AT & T - CELLULAR 14138 03/17/94 BENDTKSON, DON 14139 0]/17/94 0(X)878 BOYS & GIRLS CLUB 14140 03/17/94 001350 BUSINESS EDIJCATIOG HENI SENINAR/PS,NS lOOK FOG LiBRNtY FEB .MATER 619'f67' 1828/IiICH 909 - 202 ' 1200/F EB BENDIKSON, DOll ACCIXJNT ~ER 001-161-999-5261 001-161-999-5228 ]40-199-999-5240 001-140-999-5208 322-199-999-5208 001 - 199-4056 001-1500 001-162-999-5261 14141 03/17/94 001073 BiJTTERI)RTH NATEIIAL FOR N)A NMItlL 001-150-999-5228 14142 03/17/94 000637 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TA 000837 FRAN TAX 001-2160 14142 03/17/94 000837 CAL]FOGNIA FRANCHISE TA 000~7 FRAN TAX 100-21&0 14143 03/17/94 000950 CALIFOGNIAN - DISPIJkY ~ AJINOUNCEHEIITS OD1-150-999-525/, 14/~'~ 03/17/94 000950 CALIFOGNIAN - DISPLAY 2 C(X,. X 8 INCH DISPLAY 001-140-999-5254 141,,4 03/17/96 001247 CENTRAL I, OHZTOGZNG COGP NONITOG]NG SERVICE 100-181-999-5250 16145 03/17/94 000137 CHEVROG U.S.A. iNC. 14145 03/17/96 000137 CHEVRON U.S.A. INC. 14145 03/17/94 OO013? CHEVR~ U.S.A. INC. 14145 03/17/94 O00137 CHEVRON U.S.A. INC. FUEL/SHERiFF .FUEL/iN FLEL/B&S FIJEL/PLANNZNG 001-1fi)-999-5262 001-110-999-5263 001-162-999-5263 001-161-999-5262 14146 03/17/94 000~2 CITY OF TEHECULA - FLEX RE!II. FOG 3/10/94 P/R 1414~ 03/17/94 0006/,2 CITY OF TENECULA - FLEX REIIIB. FOG 3/10/W, P/R 141~6 03/17/94 000~2 CITY OF TENECULA - FLEX HEIII. FOG 3/10/94P/R 14146 03/17/94 00064.2 CITY OF TENECULA - FLEX REINB. FOG 3/10/94 P/R 14166 03/17/94 000~2 CITY OF TEIECULA - FLEX RE!II. FOG 3/10/94 P/R 001-10Z0 100-1020 280-1020 3OD-1020 330-1020 14147 0]/17/94 000914 CIK)A SEN[IIM/CALIF. NARCOTIC 001-170-999-5261 14148 03/17/94 001352 COIIIUNICATIOG BRIEFING SUBSCRIPTION 322-199-999-5228 16149 03/17/94 001275 CO~RV, INC. FEB. SERV. 320-199-999-5228 16150 03/17/94 000757 CONCISE CONSTRUCTION -FINAL RETENTION 210-2035 14151 03/17/94 000155 DAVLIN VIDEO/AUDIO TAPE 001-100-999-5250 14152 03/17/94 0001~, ESGIL CORPORATION 2/01-2/28 14153 03/17/94 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS POSTArE/iN 14~03/17/94 001002 FIRST INTERSTATE BANK - 5~73-666~-0391-0032/14J 001-162-999-52~8 001 - 110-999-5Z30 001-144)-999-5258 ITEN AHOUNT 65.00 48.90 42.83 14.19 .65- 35.00 4,740.52 198.00 42.00 85.51 85.51 105.92 105.00 27.75 loo.5o 8.52 21.03 726.66 Z.00 21.24 16.25 22.07 ~0.78 9.50 280.54 PArE 2 CNECK AI, IOUNT 65.00 &8.00 42.03 13.54 35.00 4,740.52 198.00 42.00 171.02 2O/,.86 105 157.80 3,814.87 225.00 69.00 22.07 5/,,843.82 710.78 806.72 9.50 VOUCHRE~' 03117/94 15:00 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOIl ALL PERICl)S PA~ VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 1~,15~. 1415/, 1/.155 1/.156 1/.157 1/,158 14159 14160 14161 14161 14161 16161 1/.16~ 1416;1 1/.166 1/.1~ 14168 14170 14171 CHECK DATE 03117/9~ 03/17/94 03/17/94 03117194 03117/94 0.3/17/94 03/17/94 0311719~ 03/17/94 03/17/94 03/17/94 03/17/94 03117194 03117/94 03117194 03/17/9/* 03/17/94 03/17/9/* 03/17/9/* 03/17/94 03/17/94 03/17/94 0311719/* 03/17/9/* 0311719/* 03117194 03/17/94 03117/94 0311719/* 0311719/* 03/17/94 03/17/94 03117194 VENDOR VENIXI ZTER NUNBER M DESCRIPTION 001002 FIRST INTERSTATE 84NK - 54736664039100/,0/PB 001002 FIRST INTERSTATE BANK - 54 zz73,f,f,%O3910081/RR 001002 FIRST INTERSTATE RANIC - 5~73666~03910081/RR 001335 FRANK g. ABAGNALE & A~ TRAINING MATERIALS ~ FREEDOH COFFEE, INC. [:OFFRE SERVICE FOH CITY 001355 GTE CALIFORNIA PHONE LINES 00018~ GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPOR ~09-181-1123 00018~ GTE CALIFOHNZA INCORPOR ~O~-t-8632/HAR. 000/,23 H & H CRAFT & FLORAL SU N!SC. 5tJPPLIES 00019'5 ICIIA STRATEGIC PLANNING BOOK 000194 iCNA RETIREMENT TRUST 4 0001~ DEF COIIP 0001~ ICNA RETIRBtENT TRUST/* 0001~4 DEF COMP 00019/, iCNA RETIREMENT TRUST 4 00019/, DEF COMP 00019~ ICMA RETIREMENT TIWST 4 00019/, DEF ~ 00019/, ICNA RETIREMENT TRUST/* 00019~ DEF ~ 0001~4 ]ClIA RETIREMENT TRUST/* O001W, DEF COMP 0001~ ]CNA RETIREMENT TRUST/* 0001~ DEF COlF 000194 iCHA RETIREMENT TRUST/* O001W, DEF CONP 0013~1 INDUSTRIAL CONCRETE CUT CONCRETE CUTTING 001351 INLAND EMPIRE ECONOMIC REGISTRATION/RUSERTS 0013~0 INNOVATIVE litAGES IqARKETING DES/GN CRC 000203 JONS AVAILABLE, INC. JUS ANNOUNCEMENT 001238 K.E. PATTERSON CO. LTD. 001238 K.E. PATTERSON CO. LTD. 001238 K.E. PATTERSON CO. LTD. 0012.',',',',',',',',"$8 K.E. PATTERSON CO. LTD. · 001238 K.E. PATTERSON CO, LTD. 001238 K.E. PATTERSON CO. LTD. STREET IHItOVENENTS IOX RETENTION STREET IMPROVEMENTS IOX RETENTION STREET IMPROVEMENTS 10~ RETENTION 001356 LA MESA, CiTY OF SURVEY DOCUMENTS 000~14 LONGS DRUG STORE FILM PROCESSING 001)/.5 LOS ANGELES CHILDRENS N TZCRETS/DAY CAJf 000653 LUCKY STORE SUPPLIES COOKIE IONSTER 00021/* LUNCH & STUFF CATERING BOX LUNCHES ACCOUNT NtlaER 001-100-999-5258 001 - 100-999-5260 001 -lOS-999-5238 001-1/*0-999-5261 3/*0-1~-~-5230 320-1~-~-5208 320-1~PJ~9-5208 320-1F)-~-5200 1~0-180-~-5301 001-110-~-5228 001-2080 100-2080 190-2080 191-2060 lf3-2080 280-2080 300-2080 3/*0-2080 1~0-180-~-5250 001-100-~-5238 lf0-180-~-5301 001-150-~F~-5254 210-1~,-627-5804 210 - 2035 210-166-&27-5804 210-2035 210-1e6-627-5804 210-2035 001 - 110-~-5222 1~0-180-~9-5250 1~0-103-9~-5~0 1f0-183-9fg-5320 001-100-~-57..~0 ITEM AMOUNT )60.00 100.13 344.71 27/*.00 166.85 682 .:33 606.27 17.17 40.96 25 ./.5 1,965.~0 563.73 ~87.69 /.1.66 5.00 23.37 50.00 553.iX) 20.00 7~6.75 252.00 1o380o00 138.00- 13,057.75 1,305.78- 21,528.60 2,152.86- 13.80 35.00 30.00 CHE~ NITJNT 1,093.~ 2~.~ 1~.~ 68,?..~ 623 .~ ~.~ 25 3,1~.~ 553.~ 20.00 252.~ 32,~9.71 13.~ 35.~ 30.~ 03/15:08 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUIt 14172 03/17/94 001142 14173.03/17/9~ 000224 14174 03/17/94 001130 14175 03117/94 000399 14175 03117/9~ 000399 14176 03/17/9~ 000587 14177 03/17/94 001353 14178 03117/94 000881 14178 03117/94 000881 14179 03117/94 14180 03117/9~ 000243 1418103/17/94 00135/, 1~""' 03/17/94 0002~6 16'1~/03/17/9~ 0002/.6 14182 03/17/94 0002~6 14182 03/17/94 0002~6 14182 03/17/94 0002~6 14182 03/17/9~ 000246 14182 03/17/94 00024,6 14182 0311719~ 0002~6 14182 03/17/9~ 000246 14182 03/17/94 000246 14182 03/17/94 0002~6 14182 03/17/96 000246 14182 03/17/96 000246 14182 03/17/94 0002/,6 14182 03/17/94 00024,6 14182 03/17/94 0002~6 14182 03/17/94 000246 14182 03/17/9/,. 000246 14182 03/17/94 0002~6 14182 03/17/94 000246 14182 03/17/94 00024,6 14182 03/17/94, 00024,6 1418~ 03/17/9A 000269 14183 03/17/94 I31313269 16183 03/17/9~ D00269 14183 03/17/9~ 013t3269 000249 M NARKHN4& ASSOCIATES NELAD & ASSOCIATES NK BATTERY MUNICIPAL lIGHT A$SIST.S MUNICIPAL lIGHT ASSIST.S MUNOZ, MARION. NATIONAL INFORMATION DA OAKRIDGE LANDSCAPE/IRRI OAKRIDGE LANDSCAPE/IRRI P.A.P,A, PAYLESS DRUG STOeE' CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK HEG[STER FOR ALL PERtCOS ITBI DESCRIPTION ENGINERING SERVICES PL.NtCK FEES BATTERIES ANNUALNENBERSHIP/LR ANNUAL NBIERSHIP/GY JANZTCRIAL SERVICES RENBIL ZiP CCl)ES REPLACEHENT LANDSCAPE REPLACEMENT LAI)SCAPE HENINARIBH FILM AND FILM PROCESSIN ACCOUNT NUMBER 190-180-999-5250 001-162-999-52/,8 310-180-999-5214 001 - 1&0-999-5226 001-150-999-5226 190-181-999-5250 330-199-999-5220 100-166-999-54.02 100-164.-999-5402 190-180-999-5258 001-162-999-5250 PC MAGAZINE SUBSCRIPTION 320-199-99~-5228 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREII 00024~ PER REDE 001'2130 PERS BIPLOYEES' RETIREN 0002/,6 PER REDE 100-2130 PERS BIPLOYEES' RETIREM __n~02~ PERS RET 001'23~0 PERS BIPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 PERS RET 100-2390 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIItEM 0002/,6 PERS HET 190-2390 PERS EMPLOYEES'. RETIREM 000246 PERS RET 191-2390 PERS BIPLOYEES' RETIREN 000246 PERS HET 19.5'2390 PERS BIPLOYEES' RETIREM 0002/,6 PERS HET 280-2390 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETILql 0002/,6 PERS RET 300'2390 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 PERS RET 320'2390 PERS EMPLOYEES' HETIIEII 0002~ PERS RET 330-2390 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRBI 0002/,6 PERS RET 340-2390 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREN Q002&6 SURVIVOR 001'2:$90 PERS EMPLOYEES; RETZREM 0002/,6 SURVIVOR 100-2390 PERS EMPLOYEES# RETIREM 00024,6 SURVIVOR 190-2390 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 0002/,6 SURVIVOR 191'2390 PERS EMPLOYEES' EETIREtl 00024~ SURVIVOI~ 19.5'2390 PERS BIPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 SURVIVOR 280-2390 PERS EtFLOYEES' RETiltEII O00Z~6 SUItVIVOIt 300-2390 PERS BIPLOYEES' RETIREM 0002/o6 SURVIVOR 320'2390 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRBI 0002~6 SWtVIVOIt 330'2390 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 SUItVIVOR 34,0-2390 CASH REI!I. FCR CITY Ell CASH REI!I. FCR CITY EN CASH REIlI. FCR CITY EM CASH REliC. FOR CITY EM CASH REINB. FOR CITY EN CASH REINB. FCR CITY EH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH 001-100-999-5220 001-100-999-5260 001 - 110-999-5260 001-110-999-5220 001-120-999-5220 001-120-999-5260 ITBI 939.75 60.00 60.130 200.00 97.00 165.00 45 42.98 34.97 107.35 107.35 10,456.05 2,688.68 2,4~7.70 80.06 284.39 155.58 232.35 10~.86 122.01 55.35 12.17 12.9.5 1.4J, .56 .~6 .9.5 .9'5 .9.5 10.76 12.00 6.00 4.28 6.23 23.CO PAGE 4 CHECK N4QtlT 80.00 200.00 262.00 45.00 42.98 3~.97 16,968.4~ VOIJCHRE2 CITY OF TENECIJLA 03117194. 15:08 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS PA~.~ VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEN ACCOUNT NUIIER DATE lltleER !lANE DESCRIPTION NUNBER ITEN N4OUNT CHECK AMOUNT 16183 03/1719~, 000269 PETTY CASH CASH REINB. FOR CITY Ell Q01-160-999-5260 16183 03/17/94 00024.9 PETTY CASH CASH liEIS. Fm CITY Ell 001-150-999-5260 14.183.03/17/94 00024.9 PETTY CASH CASH REIllB. FOR CITY Ell OO1-163-999-5220 14.183 03/17/94 000269 PETTY CUH CASH REillB. FOR CITY Ell 001-163-999-5260 16183 03/17/94 08024.9 PETTY CASH CASH REIHB. FOR CZTY Ell 081-t63-999-5226 16183 03/17/96 OOOZ4.9 PETTY CASH CASH REIB. FOR CITY Ell 100-16~-999-5218 14.183 03/17/96 000269 PETTY CASH CASH REINB. FOR CITY EN 190-180-999-52~ 14.183 o3/17/94 ooo269 PETTY CASH CASH REIllB. FOR CITY Ell 190. t80-9O9-5260 14.183 03/17/94. 000269 PETTY CASH CASH REINB. FOR CiTY EN 190-183-999-5320 18.00 5.00 13.31 20.4.2 7.76' 36.76 4.5.26 17.98 50.52 279.28 14.186 03/17/94. 00133? POLISHED PRESENTATIQllS PRESENTAT]OR TRAINING 001-14.0-999-5261 35.53 35.53 14.185 03/17/94 000253 POSTMASTER POSTAGE/HR 001-150-999-5~30 14.185 03/17/94. OOO253 POSTMASTER P~TNE/PLAN 001-161-999-5~30 14.185 03/17/96 OOO253 POSTMASTER POSTA~E/INFO SYST. 330-199-999-5~30 14.185 03/17/94 OOO253 POSTMASTER POSTAGE/CH 001-110-999-5Z30 14185 03/17/9~ OOO253 POSTMASTER POSTA~E/CTY CLRK 001-120-999-5230 16185 03/17/96 OO0253 POSTMASTER POSTAGE/PU 001-163-999-5Z30 19.9O 29.85 9.95 9.95 19.90 9.95 99.50 16186 03/17/94 000255 PRO LOCK &KEY NISC. LOCKSHITH SERVICE 19O-180-9~-5212 14.186 03/17/96 000255 PRO LOCK &KEY LOCKSNITH SERV. 190-180-999-5212 14.187 03117194 000879 RADISSON HOTEL - VISALI HOTEL/CONF/KELLI BEALE OO1-161-999-5261 14.188 03/17/94 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA gATER 01/13-02/10 193-180-999-524.0 8.50 238.56 154.OO 54.9.4.0 24.7.06 54.9.60 14.189 03/17/96 001279 .RANCHO NE~S 1/2 PAGE ADVERTISEMENT OO1-14.0-999-5~54. )~0.83 16190 03/17/94 001296 RED LION HOTEL ROCH RESERV./COCC COlIF. 19O-180-999-5258 14191 03/17/96 000266 RIGHTgAY RENT PORTABLE TOILET 100-164.-999-5238 57.39 5?.39 16192 03/17/96 000353 RIVERSIDE COUNTY AUDITO LETTERS/PARCELS 190-180-999-5370 15.00 15.Q0 14.193 03/17/96 000354. RIVERSIDE COUNTY HEALTH PERNIT/PALONA DEL SOL 19O-180-999-5250 326.OO 326.00 16196 03/17/94 001122 SCOTCH PAINT CONPORATIO PAINT, ROLLERS;M]$C. 1OO-1d4-999-5218 262.91 262.91 14.195 03/17/94. 001:~7 SENATE PUBLICATIONS HOIJ$1NG ELEllENT 001-161-999-52Z8 6.47 6.67 16196 03/17194. OO0~34. SIERRA COMPUTER SYSTEMS CONFERENCE APRIL 27-~9 OO1-161-999-5261 175.00 175.OO 14.197 03117/94. 000~85 SIR SPEEDY 5QO BUSINESS CARDS/TONY 001-167.-999-5~0 14.197 03/17/96 OO07.85 SiR SPEEDY BUSINESS CARDS/RONALD E 001-110-999-5~Z0 14.197 03/17/94. 000285 SIR SPEEDY TAX 001-110-999-5220 16197 03/17/96- 000285 SIR SPEEDY 500 BLKiMIITE BUSINESS 001-162-999-5222 16197 03/17/94 000285 SIR SPEEDY TAX 001-162-999-5222 93.4.1 1.86 24..00 1.86 14.5.13 16198 03/17/94 O007(X SI(S, INC./INLAND OIL FUEL/TS 100-164.-999-5263 16198 03/17/96 00070~ $KS, INC./IRLAllD OiL FUEL/TCSD 190-180-999-5263 16198 03/17/94 O0070& SKS, INC./INLAND OIL FUEL/B&S 001-162-999-526~ 4?4..35 77.31 4.1.99 PAGE 6 ~/VOt~2 15:08 CiTY Of TENECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERlOBS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENIXI VENDOR NUI4BER DATE NtlIER M ITBI DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT ITB4 CHECK NKXJNT 16199 0311719~. 080376 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 01126-03/0&. 16199 0311719~ 00037/* SOUTHERN PALIF EDISON 01/31-02/28 14.19~ 0)/1-7/9/, 000376 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 01/31-02/28 14.199 03/17/9~ 00037/, SOUTHERN PALIF EDISON 01/31-02/28 1/.199 03/17/9/* 00037/, $aJTHERN PALIF EDISON 01/31-02/28 1/.199 03/17/9/, 00037/, SOUTHERN PALIF EDISON 02/01-02/28 1/.199 0~117194. 00037/, SOUTHERN PALIF EDISON 01/31-02/28 1/,199 03117194. 00037/, SOUTHERE PALIF EDISON 01/31-02/28 1/,199 03117194. 080)7/,' SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 01/31-02/28 14.199 03/17/9~ 000)74. SOUTHERN PALIF EDISON 01/31-0Z/28 1/,199 0311719/, 000374 SOUTHERE PALIF EDISON 01/31-02/Z8 14,199 03/17/94 000374. SOUTHERN PALIF EDISON. 01/31-02/28 14.199 03/17/94 000374. SOUTHERE PALIF EDISON 01/31-02/28 14.199 03/17/94. 000374. SOUTHERN PALIF EDISON 01/31-02/28 14.199 03/17/94 000374. SOUTHERN PALIF EDISON 01/31-02/28 14.199 03/17/94. 00037/, SOUTHERN PALIF EDISON 01/31-02/28 14.199 03/17/94 000374. SOIJTHERN PALIF EDISON 01/31-02/28 14.199 03/17/94 000374. SOUTHERE PALIF EDISON 01/31-02/28 14.199 03/17/94 00037/, SOUTHERN PALIF EDISON 01/31-02/28 14.199 03/17/94 000374. SOUTHERN PALIF EDISON 10/21-02/28 14.199 0:$/17/94. 00037/, SOUTHERN PALIF EDISON 01/31-02/28 1~I"*' 03/17/94 000374. SOUTHERN PALIF EDISON 0t/31-02/28 l& ., 03/17/94. 000374. SOUTHERN PALIF EDISON 01/31-02/28 14.1'W 03/17/94. 00037/, SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 01/31-02/28 14.199 03/17/94 000374. SOUTHERN PALIF EDISON 01/31-02/28 14.199 03/17/94. 000374. SOUTHERN PALIF EDISON 02/02-03/07 14.199 0:$/17/94. 000374. SOUTHERN PALIF EDISON 02/02-03/07 14.1~9 03/17/9/* 000374. SOUTHERN PALIF EDISON 02/03-03/08 14.199 0:$/17/9/* 000374. SOUTHERN PALIF EDISON 01/31-03/08 14.1~ 03/17/94 000374. SOUTHERN PALIF EDISON 01/27-03/08 14.1~ 03/17/9/, 000374. SOUTHERN PALIF EDISON 0Z/08-03/0~ 14.1gg 03/17/9/* 000374. SOUTHERN PALIF EDISON 02/08-03/0~ 14.1~ 03/17/94 000374. SOUTHERN PALIF EDISON 12/Z3-01/26 14.1~ 03/17/94 000376 SOUTHERN PALIF EDISON 12/23-01/26 19Q-18Q-999-5Z~Q .191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 t9t-t80-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-524.0 190-180-999-52/,0 190-182-999-524.0 1,511.50 36.16 39.28 19.03 8.82 33.67 36.96 53.73 39.78 35.32 38,18 18,18 121.21 28.37 23.85 5,067,52 30,13 67.16 Lt.62 27.~ 37,34. 158.12 20~ .96 53.71 251.06 228.7~ 58.05 3,315.13 087.66 12,65/*,10 14.200 03/17194 000;175 SOUTHERN 1/.200 03/17/9~ 000375 SOUTHERN 14.200 03/17/94 000)75 SOUTHERN 14.200 03/17/94 000375 SOUTHERN 14.200 03117194 0Q0375 SOUTHERN 14.200 03/17/94 QQ0375 SOUTHERN 14.200 03/17/94 000375 SOUTHERN 14.200 03/17/94 000375 SOUTHERN 14.200 03117194 000375 SOUTHERN 14.200 03117194 0003.75 SOUTHERN 14.200 03117194 000375 SOUTHERN 14.200 03117/9/* 000375 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TEL 909"ZO2"4.Tr'JB/RR CALIFORNIA TEL CALIFORNIA TEL 909-202-4.753/BH PAL]FORNIA TEL 909-202-4.754.1KH CALIFORNIA TEL 909-202-/,7551VAN PAL]FORNIA TEL 909-202-4.756 PAL]FQIUtIA TEL 909-ZQ2-4.759/TE CALIFORNIA TEL 909-202-/.762/RP CALIFORNIA TEL 909-202-/.763/PB CALIFORNIA TEL 909-202-676/*/JH PALIFOItNIA TEL 909-282-/.765/TS CALIFORNIA TEL 909-202-/.769/JS 001-100-999-5206 081-110-999-5208 190-180-999-5206 190-180-999-5208 190-180-999-5208 320-199-999-5208 081-162-999-5208 001 - 100-999-5208 081 - 100-999-5208 108-1(:4-999-5208 108-164.-999-5208 001-100-999-5208 65,82 60.14. 35 35 /,9.92 76.24. 36.38 77.89 4.3.96 64.75 633.86 14.20103/17/94 000291 Sl)EE DEE OIL CHAN~E & T OIL CHANGE 310-162-999-5214. 20,99 1~1~. 03/17/94 000291 SPEE DEE OIL CHANGE & T OIL CHANGE 310-162-999-521/, 20.99 VOUCHRE2 03117194 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUIIER 14202 14202 14202 14202 14202 14202 14202 14202 14202 14202 14202 14203 16204 14204 14204 14205 14206 14206 14206 14206 14207 14207 14208 14208 14208 14208 14208 14208 14209 16209 14209 14210 14211 14212 16213 15:08 CHECK DATE 03/17/94 o3/17/96 03/17/96 03/17/96 03/17/94 03/17/96 03/17/96 03/17/94 03117104 03/17/96 03117194 03/17/96 03117/94 03/17/96 03117/96 03117196 03117194 03117194 03117194 03117194 03/17/96 03/17/96 03117196 03117/96 03117/94 03117/94 03117 /9~ 03117/94 03117/96 03117/96 03/17/96 03117/94 03117/96 03117196 03/17/96 CITY OF TENECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VENDOR VENDOR ]TEN ACCOUNT ZTEN NUIIER M DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT 0OO3O5 000307 000307 000307 0~22 000325 000325 000325 000325 0OO326 000326 001065 001065 001065 001065 001O65 001065 00O389 000389 0OO389 000339 001076 000539 STATE CONPENSATION INS. NARCH 9~ STATE CClIPENSATION INS. NARCH 96 STATE COMPENSATION INS. NARCH 94 STATE COMPENSATION INS. NARCH 96 STATE COMPENSATION INS. NARCH 96 STATE C.,IXFENSATZON INS. NARCH 96 STATE CC)W~ENSATION INS. IMRCN 96 STATE CONPENSATION INS. IMRCH 94 STATE COIIPENSATION INS. MARCH 94 STATE CQMPEN$AT]ON INS. NARCH PNT FOR MKER CCIqP STATE COMPENSATION INS. IMRCH PtIT FOR Wla~R CONP TARGET STONE NISC. 51JPPLIES TENEGULA TROPHY CO. TEMEClJLA TROPHY OD. TEMECULA TROPHY OD. UNIGL08E BUTTERFIELD TR UNITED SlAY OF THE INLAN UNITED t4AY OF TIE INLAN UNITED StAY OF THE INLAN UNITED WAY OF THE INLAN UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE USCM/PEBSCO (DEF. COIP. USCH/PEBSCO (DEF. CAMP. USa4/PEBSCO (DEF. CCI4P. USCR/PEBSOD (DEF. CONP. USCH/PEBSCO (DEF. CCIIP. USa4/PEBSOD (DEF. CI34P. IJSCR/PEBSCO, (08RA) USCN/PEBSCO, (08RA) USa4/PEBSCO, (OBRA) gIST PUBLISHING COMPANY kfSTERN WASTE, INC. WINNER YANADA ASSOCIATE WOI)PERFECT CORP. TROPHIES NISC. SUPPLIES TROPHIES AIRFARE/COMPUTER CONFER OO0325 Ug OOO325 U~ OOO325 tN 000325 UN Z GETS OF UNIFORMS CLEA UNIFORN RENTAL 001065 DEF CONP 001005 DEF COHP 001065 DEF COI4P 001005 DEF COHP 001065 DEF COHP CREDIT HEHO 000389 PT RETIR 000389 PT RETIR 000389 PT RETIR PUBLICATIONS PORTABLE TOILET RENTALS REIMBURSABLES SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL 191-2370 193-Z37'0 300-2370 320-2370 330-2570 34,0-237O 001-1182 001-1182 100-182-999-5301 100-180-999-5301 001-110-999-5220 100-182-999-5301 001-161-999-5261 001-2120 100-2120 190-2120 280-2120 100-164-999-5243 100-180-999-5243 001-2080 100-2080 190-2080 300-2080 320-2080 001-2080 001-2160 100-2160 190-2160 001-120-999-5228 100-180-999-5238 210-190-120-5802 320-1~-~;~-5228 2,414.93 1,321.95 926.14 60.17 85.66 6.22 15.08 6.81 91.71 101.58 62.23 37.16 25.86 41.24 25.86 161.00 78.9O 1.00 17.00 .60 25.00 16.10 3,024.01 197.98 156.32 3.~6 312.50 190.00- 102.82 9'3.00 137.96 24.8O 455.00 75.45 36.00 CHECK AROUNT 5,092.4,8 37.16 92.96 161.00 97.50 39.10 3,504.27 TOTAL CHECKS 177,50~.43 PAGE 8 ~/~E~- 10:59 CITY OF I'E4ECULA VOUCHER/CHECK HEGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS FIJNI) . TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 100 GAS TAX FUND 190 CCNNUNZTY SERVICES DISTRICT 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 192 TC$1) SERVICE LEVEL B 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 210 CAPITAL ZNPROVEHENT PROJ FUND 250 CAPITAL PROJECTS - TCSO 280 REDEVELOPtENT AGENCY - CIP 300 INSURANCE FUND 310 VEHICLES FUND 320 INFORHATIOII SYSTENS 3'30 COPY CENTER FUND 3~0 FACILITIES 390 TCSO DEBT SERVICE TOTAL JT 41,860.39 9,938.36 21,222.09 242.80 13&.89 1,988.3&. 1,037.00 326.00 258.64 16?.7'0 6,1)9.Z~ 131,778.61 216,21&.86 VOUCHRE2 CiTY OF TENECULA 03/25/96 10:59 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIII)S VOIJCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VEIIDOR iTEM AC(XXJNT NLNBER DATE ~ER NAIIE DESCRIPTTON ~ER ZTEN AHOUNT CHECK AHOUNT 14214 03/21/94 0013~5 RIVERSIDE COUNTY DEPART CRC INSPECTIN KITCHEN 250-190-129-580~ 326.00 357~N38 03/26/~6 000~ FIRSTAX (El)D) 000~/:~ SDI 001-2070 357908 03/26/9400e/:z.': FIRSTAX (EDD) OOC~ SD! 100-2070 35?908 03/26/W, OOL~ FIRSTAX (EDD) 000~~. SD[ 190-2070 357908 03/26/96 000/:~/: FIRSTAX (EDD) O00~z~z~ SDI 191-2070 357~08 03/24/94 0004~ FIRSTAX (EDD) 000/:/:/: SDI 192-2070 357~08 03/26/W, 000//~/~ FIRSTAX (El)D) OOL~/: SD] 193-2070 357908 03/24/94 00(:)z,4~ FIRSTAX (EDD) O013A4~ S01 280-2070 357908 03/24/94 O01)Z,~ FIRSTAX (El)D) O00/~-z_~ SI)! 300-2070 357q;08 03124194/, 000~ FIRSTAX (EDD) 000~ ~i)l 320-2070 35?;08 03/26/W, ~ FIRSTAX (EDD) O0(W~ SOl 330-2070 357~08 03/26/~4 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 00(~./.-/.- $13! 34~)-2070 357~08 03/26/W, ~ FIRSTAX.(EDO) 000/:/:/: STATE 001-2070 357908 03/24/94 00(0~/~ FIRSTAX (EDD) 00(0~ STATE 100-2070 351RN38 03126/94 000/:/:/: FIRSTAX (EDD) OOL~ STATE 1~0-2070 357908 03/26/96 000/:/:~ FIRSTAX (EDD) 0004~ STATE 191-2070 357908 03/26/94 0006/~ FIRSTAX (EDD) O01Y,4~ STATE 193-2070 357908 03/26/94 OOC~ FIRSTAX (EDD) 00134~4 STATE 280-2070 357908 03/2~/94 O00Z,/~ FIRSTAX (B)D) O01Y,4~ STATE 300-2070 357908 03/26/940I)O~Z~ FIRSTAX (EDD) O01)~G~ STATE 320-2070 357908 03/26/94 0004~4G FIRSTAX (EDD) 000~4/, STATE 330-2070 3(Y;gg3 03/26/96 000283 FIRSTAX ([RS) 000283 FEDERAL 001-2070 369993 03/26/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 100-2070 369993 03/26/96 000283 FIRSTAX (ZRS) 000283 FEDERAL 190-2070 369993 03/26/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 191-2070 369993 03/26/96 000283 FIRSTAX (]RS) 000283 FEDERAL 192-2070 3&F;~73 03/26/96 000283 FIRSTAX (]RS) 000283 FEDERAL 193-2070 369993 03/2%/96 000283 FIRSTAX (]RS) 000283 FEDERAL 280-2070 369993 03/26/96 000283 FIRSTAX (ZRS) 000283 FEDERAL 300-2070 )6Fj;~Jr3 03/26/96 000283 FIRSTAX (ZRS) 000283 FEDERAL 320-2070 3459993 03/24/9~ 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 330-2070 36g;~3 03/26/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 14EDICARE 001-2070 369993 03/26/9Z, 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 HEDICARE 100-2070 36~;g3 03/26/W, 000283 FIRSTAX ([RS) 000283 NEDICARE 190-2070 369993 03/26/96 000283 FIRSTAX ([RS) 000283 NEDICARE 191-2070 3~,,,"'~23,03/2~$/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 14F. DICARE 192-2070 3~3 03126/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 NEDICARE lg3-2070 369993 03/26196 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 14EDICARE 280-2070 3699F3 03/26/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 HEDICARE 300-2070 369993 03/26/94 000283 FIRSTAX (]RS) 000283 HEDtCARE 320-2070 369~93 03/26/96 000283 FIRSTAX (]RS) 000283 !tED[CARE 3&gg93 03/2~/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 NED[CARE 3/,0-2070 14233 03/24/96 000724 A & R CUSTOH SCREEN PRI PURCHASE T-SHIRTS 190-183-999-5380 1,09~.98 283.36 259.Q6 7.66 8.84, 27.47 14.20 9.15 24.69 10.23 15.67 2,150.12 /,60.6? 20.96 29.50 25 .~& 55.59 15.71 8,(~2.9~ 2,878.54 2,178.37 82.55 8.83 245.0~ 131 77.87 2~8.27 89.27 2,~2.88 631 577.8~ 17.07 19.72 61.20 31.70 20.43 5~.56 22.8~ 751.02 5,Z55 18,518.35 751.02 03/24194/, 000573 APOLLO S~EEpING, INC. WEEPING "EHERGENCY RES 100-1b~-999-5~02 130.00 130.00 14235 03/24/9~. 000101 APPLE ONE ~E 3/05/94 280-199-99~-5250 103,20 OV~ 10:59 CITYOF TBIECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VEIl)OR VEIl)OR ITBI ACCOUNT NLFIER DATE NIllEA IINIE DESCRZPTIOR NUNBER 14236 0~/26/W, 000676 ARBOR-PRO TREE SERVICE RENOVE, GRIND 14737.03/26/~ 000781 ASSOC. OF ENVIRONI~NTAL FEllERSHIP/DAVE HOGNI 001-161-999-5226 14238 03/26/9~ 001072 BANK OF AHERICA MT & SA TCSC CERT. PARTICIPATIO 390-1060 14739 03/26/9~ O00~Z$ BARB'S BALLOONING AFFAI DECORATE CRC 1~)-180-;-5301 14260 03/24/~ OO0402 BERG, IMRK REZli. NENBERSHIP RENEH O01-1&2-999-S22& 14240 03/24/9/, OOO~02 BERG, HARK HE!II. NEHBERSHIP RENEM OO1-162-999-522~ 14241 03/26/~, BETA SIGNA PHI-PRECEPTO BETA SIGHA PHI/REFUND lg0-183-69~0 14242 03/24/9/, 000120 RICKNELL TRAVEL CENTER TRAVEL/CONF. APR 12-15 190-180-999-5258 16263 03/24/W, 00133& BIG R & LITTLE T 14243 03124194 001336 BIG R & LITTLE T 142~4 G3/26/96 OO0~75 BN] PUBLICATIORS, INC. LOH GRN)E 8' RAILROAD T 100-1~-999-5218 TAX 100-1~/,-9~-5218 UNIFORM BUILD CODE OO1-1&3-~-5228 16265 0~/26/96 000603 .CABLE & HIRELESS CClqltlN FEB. 16-HAR. 15 1~ 03/26/96 000129 CAL HEST RENTAL CENTER EQUIPflINT RENTAL 320-199-999-5208 190-180-~-52~8 14267 03/24/94 001~0 CALIFORNIA BUILDING COD HEHINAR/BUILD INSPECTOR OO1-162-~-52~1 142~8 03/24/94 OO08]7 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TA 000837 14248 03/24/96 OO08~7 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TA 0008~7 FRAN TAX 001-2140 FRAN TAX 100-2140 14269 03/24/94 CASSAitO, KATHLEEN 16250 03/26/96 000489 COBB OROIJP THE CASSARO/REFUND C :~05182/SUBSCR Z PT I ON 1~0-18~-4982 320-199-;-5228 16251 03/26/9~ 0011~J COle USA, INC. 16252 03/24/9~ 0O1328 COUNTRY HISTERN DANCE ~OFTHARE CONTRACT CLASS 320-199-999-5221 190-183-9~-5330 14253 03124194 000155 DAVLIN AUDIO TAPE; PLANNING 001-161-999-5730 16254 03/24/96 OO1135 FIRST CARE III)USTRIAL N PRE-EIIPLOYHENT PHYSICAL OO1-150-99~-5250 14254 0~/24/94 OO1135 FIRST CARE IliUSTRIAL N DNV PHYSICAL 14255 03/26/96 OOlOO2 FIRST INTERSTATE BANK - 5~7'4Jtt~OT~1OO57/SN 1~.55 03/24Z94 OOlOO2 FIRST INTERSTATE BANK - 5673666603910057/SN 16255 03/24/94 001002 FIRST INTERSTATE RANK - 56~03910115/JG 14255 03/24/96 OOlOO2 FIRST INTERSTATE BANK - 5~73~03910115/JG 16255 03126196 OOlOO2 FIRST INTERSTATE BANK- 56'7"/,,f,~f~O39101311TE 190-180-999-5250 lOO-180-999-5738 lOO-180-999-5260 OO1-120-999-5258 OO1-120-999-5220 001-162-999-5258 16256 03/26/94 000178 FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY SUPPLIES 12''~ 03/24/9/, 000175 GFOA 10~ INFO. 001-161-999-5220 OO1-1M)-999-5228 ITEI4 AI4OlXrr 275 .OO 80.OO 131,778.61. 339.61 65.00 45.OO lOO.OO 474.00 222.40 17.26 126;30 1,825,63 640.OO 93.96 28.OO 59.OO 54.13 6A9.60 150.00 130.OO 4O.OO 109.69 48.51 667.65 76.39 39.OO PAGE 2 CHECK ANOLIT 275.00 131,778.61 339.41 ?39.66 126.30 1,825 64.0.OO 187.92 28.OO 59.OO 56.13 64,9.60 150.OO - 178.OO VOUCHRE2 03/25/94 10:59 CITY OF TBECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR NUMBER DATE NLIIBER VENDOR M ITEH DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUMBER ITB4 AJ4QUNT CHECK AMOUNT 16258 03/26/96 000969 14259.03/2~/W, 0001r2 14259 03/24/9~ 000192 16259 03124196 000192 14259 03/24/94 000192 GKN RENTALS GLOBAL COMPUTER SlJPPLIE GLONAL COI4PUTER SUPPL]E GLORAL COIgqJTER SUPPL]E GLOBAL COI4RJTER SUPPLIE EOUIP. RENTAL C2787 HP LASERJET 3St T C3060 I 3/6 X 1/2 LABEL FREIGHT TAX 190-180-999-5258 320-1~9-~q~-5221 320-1~-999-5221 320- W9-~-5221 320-199-99~-5221 600.00 227.98 7.35 8.80: 18.66 600.00 262.79 14260 03/24/94 000711 GRAPHICS UNLINITED LITH ENLARGE HAP 190-180-999-5222 60.3~ 60,3~ 14261 03/26/94 000186 GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPOR 1426103/24/W, 000184 GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPOR ~)~-d86-1993/HE 162~1 03/26/94 00018/, GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPOR 909-695-35d4 16261 *03/24/94 00018/, GTE CALIFORNIA ]NCORPOR 100-1&~-99~-5208 320-1~9-999-5208 320-W9-999-5208 320-1~9-~j~-5208 16262 03/24/94 001359 HODSON, JACK BOOT REINB. 100-164-~99-5263 301.82 :3~.82 39.07 95.00 616.75 ~5.00 16263 0)124194 000190 HOIE BASE 14263 03124/94 000190 HO~E BASE ~39860 COUNTER/SP. PR 190-180-999-5212 MISC. SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5212 301.70 56.10 355.80 162(~4 03/24/94 000194 I(346 RETIREHINT TRUST 6 000194 DEF CORP 001-2080 16266 03126/94 000194 ICHA RETIREMENT TRUST 4 000194 DEF CONP 100-2080 1626~ 03/24/94 000194 ICNA RETIREHINT TRUST 4 000194 DEF CCI4P 190-2080 14266 03/26/94 000194 ICMA RETIRERENT TRUST 4 000194 DEF COILo 191-2080 1426~ 03/26/94 000194 ICNA RETIRERENT TRUST 4 000194 DEF CClIP 193-2,080 16264 03/26/94 000194 ICNA RETIRERENT TRUST 6 000194 DEF CONP 280-2080 16264 03/24/94 000194 ]CNA RETIRERENT TRUST 6 000194 DEF CCMP 300-2080 14264 03/24/94 000194 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST A 000194 DEFCOHP 340-2080 14265 03/24/94 001340 INNOVATIVE ZHAGES COLOR CHARGE/SP BOTTLES 190-180-999-5301 1,393.17 534.82 496.96 34.08 61.66 5.00 25.37 50.00 35.00 2,601.06 35.00 14266 03/24/94 001358 INSTITUTE FOR CONTINUIN SEMINAR/IJORK. CONP. 001-150-;-5261 170.00 170.00 14267 03124194 000206 14268 03124196 000596 14269 03/24/94 001030 16269 03/24/94 001030 '162~ 03/26/W, 001030 16270 03126194 000228 16270 03/26/94 000228 16270 03/26/94 000228 14270 03/26/94 000228 16271 03/24/94 001213 14272 03/26/94 001363 16273 03/24/94 000259 16273 03/24/94 000259 KINKO'S OF RIVERSIDE, I LEAGUE OF CA CITIES/LAF MINI'GRAPHIC SYSTEMS, I MINI'GRAPHIC SYSTENS, I MINI-GRAPHIC SYSTEMS, I MISC. PRINTING SERVICES SEMINAR APR. 13-15 MISC. SUPPLIES MISC. SUPPLIES MISC. SUPPLIES :330-19~-~9~-5220 190-180-99~-5258 001-120-99~-5250 001-120-9f9-5250 001-120-~-5250 MOBIL FULE/TS 100-164-999-5243 MOBIL FUELIE 001-110-99~-5263 MOBIL FUEL/TE 001-162-999-5263 MOBIL FUEL/B&S 001-162-~9-5263 OIL POLICE CYCLE APPLICATION FEE UE 02/20 UE 01/16/94 MURRIETA ROTORSPORTS NATIONAL CIVIC LEAGUE OLSTEN TEMPORARY SERVIC OLSTEN TEMPORARY SERVIC 001-170-~-5216 190-180-99~-5256 001-162-999-51i8 001-1~.-999-5119 21 .~ 873.00 273.20 238.02 11,68 17,~8 12 ,~0 8.51 350.00 291.20 73.27 21 8/5.00 534.01 81.0a 8.51 350.00 PAGE 10:59 CiTY OF TEtECULA VOUCHF. It/CIECICREGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VQIJCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR NUIiER DATE NIJIIR NAIIE ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCCXJNT NUI4BER ITEM ANOUNT CHECK NIXIT 1427~ 0:5124194 OIX)Z~9 14273 03124194 000239 14273 0~124194 000239 14273 0312/,194 000239 14,273 03/24,/94 0002J9 14273 0'5/24/94, 000239 14,27/* 03/24,/94 001160 14,273 03124,194 0002~6 14273 03124194 00026,6 14,273 03124194 0002/,6 14,273 0:5124,194 0002~6 14,273 03/24,/94 0002~6 1/.273 03/2/*/94, 0002/,6 1/.275 03/24,/94, 0002/6 1/,273 03/24,/94 0002/,6 14,273 03124,194 0002~6 14,275 03/24,/94 000241 14,273 03/24,/94, 0002~6 14,273 03/24,/94 0002~6 14,.~''~,. 0~/24/94 0002/,6 14 03/24,/94 000246 142~ 03/24,/94 0002~6 1/.275 03/24,/94 0002~6 1/.275 03/2/*/94 0002/,6 14,275 03/2/*/94 00024,6 14,273 03/24,/94 00024,6 14,275 03/2A/94, 0002/,6 1/.273 03/2/*/94' 0002/.6 14,275 0)/24,/94, 00024,6 14,275 0)/2/*/94 0002/*6 14,273 03/24,/94 0002~6 OLSTEN TBIN31IARY SIRtiC OLSTEN TBIN3RARY SERVIC OLSTEN TEIIP(XIARY PELVIC OLSTEN TENPOeJ~Y IBVlC O~STEN TENPOIIARY SERVIC OLSTEN TEMPORARY SERVIC PACTEL CELLULAR-LA PERS ENPLOYEES' RETIRE!t PERS BIPLOYEES, RETIREM PERS ENPLOYEES' PETIREN PERS EMPLOYEES' RET]REM PERS EMPLOYEES' PETIREM PERS EMPLOYEES' PETItEM PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRBI PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM PERS BIPLOYEES' GETIREII' PERS EMPLOYEES~ RETZREM PERS EHPLOYEES' ItETZItEII PERS ENPLOYEES' RETZREN PERS EIIPLOYEES' RETIRBI PERS BIPLOYEES' PETIRB! PERS BIPLOYEE$' RETZREII PERS EIFLOYEES' RETIRBI PERS EIFLOYEES' RETIRBI PERS BFLOYEES' RETIRBI PERS BFLOYEES' RETZREH PERS EIFLOYEES' PETEREll PERS EIFLOYEES' RETIRBI PERS EIfLOYEES' RETIRe PERS EIfLOYEES' RETIREM Ii 01/16 k'E 01/23/9~ I,~ 01/30/94, tE 02/06 lIE 02/13 I,E 02/27 LA6015202/TH 0002~6 . PER REDE 000Z~6 PER REDE 00024~ PERS PET 0002~6 PERS PET 0002/~ PERS PET 0002&6 PERS PET 0002/,6 PERS RET 0002&6 PERS RET 00024,6 PERS GET 0002/,6 PERS RET 0002&6 PERS RET 00024,6 PERS RET 0002/,6 PERS RET 0002~6 SURVIVOR 0002/*6 SURVIVOR 000266 SURVIVOR 00024,6 SURVIVOR 0002~6 SURVIVOR 0002/,6 SURVIVOR 0002~6 SURVIVOR 0002~6 SURVIVOR 00024~ SURVIVOR 0002~6 SURVIVOR 0002~6 SURVIVOR 001-162-999-5116 · 001 - 162-999-5118 001-162-999-5118 001-162-999-5118 001-162-999-5118 001-162-999-5118 320-199-999-5208 001-2130 100-2130 001 -Z590 190-Z~0 191-2:~0 ~0-2~0 ~z~O-2:~O 1~0-2:~0 192-2~90 1F~-2:~)0 ~/*0-~0 ~5.~ 2~ .M 71.73 107.35 107.35 10,131.19 2,~3.~ ~.57 2~.39 155.58 234,.01 194.~ /.7.11 12.31 13.~ 1.~ .56 .~6 1.86 2,238.6O 71 16,813.84. 1/.216 03124,194, 00024.8 1/.276 0312/.194, 00024,8 14,276 03124,194, 00024,8 1/,276 03124,194, 00024,8 14,276 03/2/*/94, 0002/,8 PETROLANE PETROLANE PETROLAME PETROLANE PETROLANE FUEL DOUBLE HEAD lit. HEATER TAX 10 GAL PROPANE TANKS TAX 100-16/,-999-52d3 100-16A-999-5242 100-16&-999-52/.2 100-164-999-52/.2 100-164-999-52&2 19.68 263.90 20 110.4,6 8.56 14,277 0312/.19/* 0002/*9 1/.277 03124,194 0002/*9 14277 0312/.194 000249 14277 0312/.194 0002/*9 14,277 03/2/*/94 0002/*9 14,277 O3/2/*/94 OOO2/*9 14,277 O3/2/*/94 OOO2/*9 14,277 03/24,/94 OOO2/*9 14,277 03/2/*/9/* 0002~9 :,~z. 03/2/*/94 000249 03/2/*/9/* 0002/*9 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH 001-199-/*070 001-1~0-999-5258 001 - 1/,0-999-5260 001-110-9q9-5260 100-183-999-5320 001-163-999-5261 190-180-999-5220 320-199-999-52/d 001-16.'5-999-5260 190-181-999-5301. 190-180-999-5~01 21 .QQ 35.14 35.16 /*.32 25.89 VOUCHRE2 PAG~ 03125194. 10: 59 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 14277 14.278 14.278 1~278 14.279 14.279 14280 14.285 14.285 14286 14.287 14290 14292 CHECK DATE 03124.194. 03124/94 03124.194 03124194 03/~/94 03/~/94 03124194 03/24/94 03/24./94 03/24/94 03/24/94 03/24/94 03124194 03124.194 03124194 03124194 03124194 03124.194 03124194 03124.194 03/24/94. 03124/94 03124.194 03124./94 03/24./94 03124/94 NUNlEA 000249 O0O253 00O253 000253 00O253 OOO253 000253 000254 000254 000P_54 001015 001015 001015 001015 000992 O00f~7 00094>7 000~ 000~07 000~07 0004.26 0004.26 0004.26 0004.26 00O836 001365 000269 000269 0OO28O 0OO28O O01122 0004.03 OOO385 M PETTY CASH POSTMASTER POSTMASTER POSTItRSTER POSTIIASTER POSTMASTER POSTMASTER PRESS-ENTERPRISE COI~AN PRESS-ENTERPRISE COlePAN PIESS-ENTERPRISE COlePAN PROGRAIE) FOB SUCCESS, PROGRAIIED FCI SUCCESS, PROGRAIED FOR SUCCESS, PRDGRNIIED FOR SUCCESS, RAMONA TIRE, INC. RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C RANCHOCALIFORNIAIMTER RANCHO CALIFORNIA MATER RANCHO CAR MASH RANCHO CAR MASH RANCNO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL RANCHO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL RANCND INDUSTRIAL SUPPL RANCHO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL RANCHO NUFFLER SPECIALI RIVERSIDE COUNTY DEPART RIVERS]DE OFFICE SUPPLY RIVERSIDE OFFICE SUPPLY SC SIGNS SC SIGNS SCOTCH PAINT CORPORATIO SHAMi SCOTT POOL & SPA SHELDON EXTINGUISHER CO SHELDGN EXTINGUISHER CO SHELDON EXTINGUISHER CO CITY OF TEIECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION PETTY CASH POSTAGEIHR POSTAGE/PLAN I~TAGE/CC POSTAGE/CH POSTAGE/CC PO~TAGEIIN JOB ANNCUNCEIENTS JON ANNOUNCERENT JOB ANNOUNCEIENT FACILITY USE PEWIITS-IO REGISTRATION RECEIPTS - FREIGHT TAX TIRE BALANCE NISC. COPIES NISC. COPIES 01/20-02/17 01/20-02/17 MASH/B&S k~H/l~a JANITONIAL SUPPLIES JANITORIAL SUPPLIES SENION SUPPLIES MISC, SUPPLIES REPAIR BASE NOUNT PLAN CHECK SIGNATURE PLATE; NEU Cl TAX SIGNS JAN POSTING FEE PAINT ROLLERS, NISC. POOL MAINTENANCE FEB.94 DRY CIEMICAL POM)ER SF. ItVICE ON 2 1/2 LB & 5 TAX ACCOUNT NtRER 190-180-999-5222 001-150-999-5250 001 - 161-999-5250 330-199- 999 - 5230 001 - 11 O- 999-5250 001 - 120-999-5250 001-163-999-5230 001-150-999-5254. 190-180-999-5254. 001-150-999-5254. 190-180-999-5220 190-180-999-5220 190-180-999-5220 190-i8O-999-5E0 310-1d4,-;-5214. 001-166-999-5423 001-161-999-5224. 193-180-999-5240 190-180-999-524.0 310-162-;-5214. 310-1~,.-;-5214. 190-180-999-5212 340-199-999-5212 190-181-999-5212 100-180-999-5212 100-164-999-5215 210-190-136-5802 001-14.0-999-5220 001-140-999-5220 001-120-999-5244 190-180-999-5244 100-164-999-5218 190-180-999-5212 3/,0-199-999-5212 340-199-999-5212 340-199-999-5212 ITEN MIOUMT 19.90 29.85 9.95 9.95 19.90 9.95 169.75 228.76 24,4.61 34.0.00 390.00 29.57 52.93 103.42 135.76 184.52 1,278.4.1 121.4.0 16.00 ~.~ 115.&8 ~0.30 77.8~ 72.13 41.16 700.00 04..OO 6.51 135.00 45.00 2.39 103.20 8.75 15.00 .68 CHECK ANOUNT 99.50 643.12 '812.50 32~"~ 1,399.81 305.80 4.1.16 90.51 180.00 2.39 103.20 0)V~ CITY OF TENECULA 10:59 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOG ALL PERlOGS PAGE V(XJCHER/ CHECK: CHECK VEIl)OR VENI)OG ZTB! ACC(X.NT NLI4BER DATE ~R RAI4E DESCRIPTIOG NUMBER ITB4 mT CHECK 16293 03/26/9~ 001361 SHOOS.aN, RICHARD P. JAZZ CONCERT 1629~ 03/26/9~ 00043~ SIERRA COIFUTER SYSTEMS SIERRA COGF./TA 190-18:5-999-5370 001 - 162-999-5261 875.00 175.00 16295 03/Z6/9~ 000285 SIR SPEEDY 1000; TBIECULA POLICE D 001-170-999-5220 16295 03/26/96 000285 SIR SPEEDY 500; TEHECULA POLICE DE 001-170-999-5220 16295 0)124194 000285 SIR SPEEDY TAX 001-170-999-5720 63.26 37.11 7.78 108.15 16296 03/26/9~ 000704 SIS, INC./INLAND OIL FUELIB&S 001-162-999-5263 16296 0)12619/, 000706 SKS, INC./INLAND OIL FUEL/TCSD 190-180-999-5263 16296 0)12619/, 00070~ SES, INC./INLAND OIL FUEL/PV 100-1d4-999-5263 39.89 148.55 :342.56 531.00 14297 03/24/9~ 001:362 SHITH, HAL JAZZ CONCERT 190-183-999-5370 16298 0)/26/96 000376 SIX/TERN CALIF EDISON 2/03-0)/07 190-180-9~9-5260 700.00 3,542.69 70O.OO 3,562.69 16294) 03/24/96 000926 SOUTHERN CAL[F EDZSOII TEMPORARY POI,ER/LIEFER 210-166-627-58N, 337.00 337. O0 14300 0)126196 001212 SOUTHERN CALIFOGNIA GAS 2115-3/17 190-180-999-5260 588.56 588.56 1630103/Z6/94 000375 S(XrrHERN CALIFOGNIA TEL 9092026751/TS 1(r~03/26/9~ 000375 SOUTHERN CAL[FOGNIA TEL 909-202-6752 Se 1~ !03/26/9~ 000375 SOUTHERN CALIFOGNIA TEL 909-202-4761/Sl4 1630103/26/9~ 000375 SOUTHERN CALIFOGNIA TEL 909-202-5153 GY 100-16~-999-5208 190-180-999-5208 001 - 100-999- 5208 001-110-999-5208 16302 03/26/96 000576 SUPER TONER HP-]I-lll LAHERJET CART 320-199-999-5221 16302 03/26/96 000576 SUPER TONER TAX 320-199-999-5221 59.76 97.87 139.33 112.85 400.79 5~).36 14303 03124194 000905 TENECULA SHUTTLE SERVIC TCSD STAFF/AIRPORT 190-180-999-5258 100.00 100.00 14304 03/24/94 000515 TEMECULA VALLEY CMER SECRETARY LUNCHEON 001-160-999-5200 10.00 10.00 14305 03/24/(~ 001022 THOISPSOIi PUBLISHING OGO SUBSCRIPTION 16306 03/24/9/, 000319 TOMARK SPORTS, INC. REPLACEMENT DIGGING TEE 14306 03/26/9~ 000319 TOIIAItK SPORTS, INC. FREIGHT 14306 03/26/96 000319 TONARK SPORTS, INC. TAX 001 ' 150'999'5228 190-180-999-5212 190-180-999-5212 190-180-999-5212 219.00 270.00 8.26 20.93 219.00 299.19 14307 03/24/9~ Q(X)320 TME CENTER STATIC)HERS OFFICE SUPPLIES 16307 03/24/9~ 000)20 TOMliE CENTER STATIONERS MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 16307 03/26/9~ 000~20 TOlalE CENTER STATIONERS OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-163-999-5220 190-180-999-5220 190-180-999-5220 57.02 18.45 16.56 92.03 16308 03/26/9/, 000)25 UNITED HAY OF THE INLAN 000325 IN 1~38 03/24/94 000325 UNITED kVkY OF THE INLAN 000325 LIB 14308 03/26/9~ 000325 UNITED HAY OF THE [NLAN 000325 16308 03/26/9~ 000~25 UNITED 14AY OF THE ZNLAN 000325 001-2120 100-2120 190-2120 280-2120 78.85 1.05 17.00 .00 97.50 1/,309 0)/24/96 000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE UNIFOIN RENT 100-16&-999-5263 16309 0)/24/94 000326 tillTOG RENTAL SERVICE UNIFOIU4 RENTAL 190-180-999-5263 lzkwt 0)/24/9/, 000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE FLCX)R HATS FOG CITY HAL 3/,0-199-999-5250 25.00 16.10 34.50 73.6O VOUCHRE2 031~196 VOUCHER/ CHECK N~ER 14310 1~310 14310 14310 14310 14311 14311 14311 14312 14313 14313 14314 10:59 CHECK DATE 03/2~,/94 03/24/94 03/24/94 03124194 03/24/9A 03124194 03/24/9~ 03124194 03124194 0312419~ HUNGER ~1~5 001~5 ~1065 ~1~5 001~5 000335 000820 OOO820 00034,8 VENDOR NH U$CM/PEB$CO (DEF. C(IF. USCX/PEBSCO (DEF. COle. USCMIPEBSCO (DEF. USCM/PEBSCO (DEF. CCKo. USCM/PEBSCO (DEF. COMP. US~/KBSOD, (~) USCM/PEBSCO, (~) USCM/PEBSCO, CO81tA) WESTERN CiTY NAGAZINE WINCHAK, KRIS UINCHAK, IOtlS Z]GLER, GAZL CITY OF TENECULA VOUCHER/CliCK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION 001065 DEF C(NP 001065 DEF C~P 001065 DEF COMP 001065 DEF COMP 001065 DEF COI4P 000389 PT RETIR 000389 PT RETIR 000389 PT RETIR ADVERTISEHINT FOR CITY MORICERS CONP/NARCH 94 PROF. SERV. REFRESINENTS CRC ACCOUNT tlUI~ER 001-2080 100-2080 190-2080 300-2080 320-2080 001-2160 100-2160 190-2160 0O1-150-999-5254 001-1182 190-180-999-5250 190-180-9~9-5260 iTEN ARCUIT 7,641.01 197.98 156.32 3.46 313.35' 107.14 96.00 141.52 622.00 101.58- 1,050.00 400.00 PN:r'~7 CHECK 8,312.12 344.66 622.00 948.42 400.0O TOTAL CHECKS 214,214.86 11:~5 CITY OF TBIECULA VOUCHER/CHEClCREGZ$1'ER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE FINd) TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 100 GAS TAX FUND 190 COI4NUNITY SERVZCES DISTRICT 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 210 CAPITAL [NPROVEHENT PROJ FUND 250 CAPZTAL PROJECTS - TCSD 280 REDEVELOPNENT AGENCY - C]P 300 [NStJRANCE/FIJND 320 [NFOR:HATZON SYSTEI4S 330 COPY CENTER FUND 3/+0 FACILZTEES TOTAL JT 13,147.06 22,525.7'0 7,&00.54~ 16,003.21 1,956.20 5,760.00 2,678.05 1,526.29 18,780.30 2,0&1.21 6,&96.Z3 VOUCHRE2 03/25/9~ 11:45 CiTY OF TE!4E~ULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK NUIIER CHECK DATE VENDOR NUMBER iTEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUHBER ITEM AHOUNT CHECK AHOUNT 14318 14318 14318 1618 0~/05/94 04/05/~ 04105194 04105194 001281 001281 001281 00 1281 ALMRA GROUP ALHAIIRA GROUP ALHAMBRA GROUP ALHAMBRA GROUP SN4 HICKS PARK REZMEURSABLES FOR P.O. ADDT'L DRAWING LOll LINDA PARK/PH 2 280'199'805-5802 '210'190'134-5802 210-190-134-5802 210-190-134- 5802 2,678.05 250.00 1,350.00 131.20 4,409.25 16319 14319 ' 16319 14319 14319 1619 14319 041051~ 0410519~ 041051~ 041051~ 04/05/~ 041051~ 041051~ 000131 000131 000131 0OO131 OOO131 000131 000131 CARL WARREN & CO:, INC. CARL MARREN & CO., INC. CARL MARREN & CO., INC. CARL MARREN & CO., iNC. CARL WARREN & CO., iNC. CARL MARREN &CO., INC.' CARL WARREN & CO., INC. LOSS 6/211;r~/HASK LOSS 01/29/93/IUINTEK LOSS 4/'~/~/JAIICAR LOSS 8/25193/THOMPSON LOSS 02/01/91/YRAGER 0~/10/~/ED i SUM LOSS 9/21/;~/Ne~rrEN 300-199-999-5205 300-199-999-5205 300-199-999-5205 300-199-999-5205 300-1999-999-5205 300-199-999-5205 300-199-999-5205 377.63 232.25 186.00 175.50 175.63 115.15 266.13 1,526.29 14320 14320 1620 14320 14321 14322 14322 14322 1622 041051~ 04105194 04105194 041051~ 041051~. 04105194 041051~4 04105194 041051~ 000135 000135 000135 000135 000754 001056 001056 001056 001056 CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER ELLIOTT GROUP, THE EXCEL LANDSCAPE EXCEL LANDSCAPE EXCEL LANDSCAPE EXCEL LANDSCAPE MlSC. HARDMARE FOR SIGN MISC. HARDUARE FOR SIGN MISC. HARDMARE FOR SIGN MiSt. HARDMARE FOR SIGN LANDSCAPE REVIEW LANDSCAPE NAINT. LANDSCAPE NRINT. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE LANDSCAPE MAINT. 100-164-999-52~ 100-1~4-999-524~ 100-164-~-52~4 100-1~4-999-52~4 001-161-999-5250 lf3-180-999-5415 193-180-~-5415 190-180-999-5250 1~3-180-~-5415 969.75 140.08 145 .~6 1,260.00 4,295.00 405.97 6,877.81 11,302.24 1,354.53 1,260.00 22,881.02 14323 163~ 14324 14324 14324 1624 14324 14324 14324 14324 14324 1624 14324 14324 14324 1624 '1624 14325 14325 14326 14326 1626 1626 04/05/~ 041051~ 04105194 04105/94 O4105194 04105194 04105194 04105194 041051~ 04105194 041051~ 04105194 04105194 04105194 04105194 0~/05/94 0410519~ 041051~ 0410519~ 04105194 04105194 04105194 041051~, 000712 000712 000177 000177 000177 000177 000177 000177 000177 0OO177 000177 000177 0OO177 000177 000177 000177 000177 000202 000202 OOO226 0O0226 0OO226 OOO226 FORD, STEVEN J. FORD, STEVEN J. GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT GLENHIES OFFiCE PRCl)UCT GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT GLENHIES OFFiCE PRODUCT GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT GLENNZES OFFICE PRODUCT GLENNiES OFFICE PRODUCT J.F. DAVIDSON ASSOCIATE J.F. DAVIDSON ASSOCIATE MICRO AGE COHPUTER CENT MICRO AGE CCIIPUTER CENT NIORO AGE COMPUTER CENT MICRO AGE COMPUTER CENT PROFESSIORAL SERV. MAR. 250-100-129-5804 PROFESSIONAL SERV./FEB 250-190-129-580~ MiSt. OFFICE PRODUCTS AOP-302 iNSTA'PLAQUE AW TAX MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES MXSC. OFFICE SUPPLIES NISC. SUPPLIES MiSt. OFFICE PRODUCTS NISC. OFFiCE PRODUCTS MiSt. OFFICE PROOUCTS 001-140-~-5220 190-180-~9~-5220 1~0-180-f99-5220 100-180-~-5220 1~0-180-999-5220 001-110-~9-5220 001-140-999-5220 001-140-999-5220 001-140-999-5220 SAF-408~; 10 X 2 314 TW 340-199-999-5242 TAX 340-199-~-5242 MISC. OFFICE PRODUCTS 001-140-999-5220 OFFICE SUPPLIES 190-100-999-5220 MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-140-~-5220 M]SC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-140-999-5220 VIDEO PROJECTOR RENTAL 210-1~0-137-5802 DESIGN SERVICES 001-163-;-5250 STORAGE DIHENSIORS TAPE 320-19fi TAX 320-1970 STORAGE DIHENSZORS 2.16 320-1970 TAX 320-1970 1,660.00 4,100.00 7.56 386.25 29.93 95.0O 1.21' 27.42 17.72 8.32 15.11 34.53 10.34 193.20 35.8~ 225.00 7,700.00 8,4:~9.00 653.25 7,620.00 59O.55 5,760.00 1,451.37 7,~25.00 17,2~ 03V~ PAGE 2 11 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUllER 1/,327 1/,327 1/,327 1/,328 1/,328 1/,329 16329 14330 1/,330 1/,330 1/,331 1/,332 1/,332 1,rk3:32 14332 1/332 1Lx3~ 1/,333 CHECK DATE 0410519/, 04/05/O4 0410519/* 0/*10519/* 0/*1051O4 0~1051O4 lY, I051O4 0/*10519/* 04/05/9~ 0/*/05/~ 0/*1051O4 041051O4 0/*1051O4 0/*1051O4 04,10519/* 0/*1051O4 VENDOR NUIIER 00O883 000883 000883 000437 001007 001007 0002/*0 OOO2/*O 0002/*0 000513 000302 000302 000302 000302 OOO302 000302 000302 000302 000332 000332 0003/*5 000..~5 CITY OF TENECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VEIl)OR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM M DESCRIPTION NUIgER AMOUNT liMTELEONE EXCAVATING NONTELEONE EXCAVATING HONTELEONE EXCAVATING NOItELAND &ASSOCIATES HOMELAND &ASSOCIATES NPG CORP. NPG CORP. ORANGE COUNTY STRIPING ORANGE _t~__NTY STRIPING ORANGE COUNTY STRIPING SIII40NS, BECKY MCLEAN . SYSTEM SOIJRCE, INC. SYSTEM SOURCE, INC. SYSTEM SOURCE, INC. SYSTEM SOURCE, INC. SYSTEM SOURCE, INC. SYSTEM SOIJRCE, INC. SYSTEM SOURCE, INC. SYSTEM SOURCE, INC. VANDORPE CHOU A$SOCIATI VANDORPE CHOU AS$OCIATI XEROX CORPORATION BILLI XEROX CORPORATION BILLI 10 itS. IILRDE MORK REMOVAL OF DEBRIS RENCNAL OF DEBRIS 100-1,';4-999-5/*02 100-16/*-9~-5/*01 lOO-1(~.-999-5/*01 TOT-TRNISlEMT OCCUPANCY OO1-14~)-999-5248 SEMINAR/,/12/9~ OO1-1/,0-999-5260 ORDER 193-O4-80 lOO-164-999-5/*02 "EMERGENCY" TRENCH REPA lOO-164-999-5/,02 RESTRIPING STRIPING SERVICE STRIPING SERVICE lOO-16/*-999-5/,10 lOO-16~-999-5410 100-16~-999-5~10 ' TRA I N ! NG 320-199-999- 5250 OPTION Ill QUOTE FOR PU 340-1960 SERV iCE 340 - 1960 TAX 340-1960 PFF 3060T; TABLE DESK 3 3~0-1960 PFF 24~0T; TABLE DESK 2 340-1960 PF2072TlaC; TANLE DESK 2 340-1960 SERVICE; MOVE PEDESTAL, 344)-1960 TAX 340-1960 PLAN CHECK FEES PLAN CHECK SERV. lIAR. OO1-162-~-52~8 001-162-999-52~8 liTER USAGE lITER USAGE 330-1~-999-5~9 330-1~-999-5~9 1,100.00 970.OO 950.00 1,500.71 ?5.OO 2,350.OO 2,100.00 5,635.81 7,610.36 /*55.00 1,4.87.50 2,767.00 1,960.00 21/*.47 3OO.OO 372.OO 421 .OO 70.OO 91.69 1,523.39 369.39 968.40 1,072.81 CHECK ANOUNT 3,020.OO 1,575.71 4,450.00 13,701.17 1/,87.50 6,286.16 2,O41.21 TOTAL CHECKS ~6,31/*.7~ ITEM NO. CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA · AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Mary Jane McLarney, Finance Officer DATE: April 5, 1994 SUBJECT: City Treasurer's Report as of February 28, 1994 RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive and file the City Treasurer's report as of February 28, 1994.. DISCUSSION: Reports to the City Council regarding the City's investment portfolio and receipts, disbursements and fund balance are required by Government Code Sections 53646 and 41004 respectively. The City's investment portfolio is in compliance with the Code Sections as of February 28, 1994. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: 1. City Treasurer's Report as of February 28, 1994 2. Schedule of Fund Balances as of February 28, 1994 ~ of Tern As of F®brumy 28, 1994 Cash Activity for the Month of Februmy: Cash and Investments as of February 1, 1994 Cash Receipts Cash Disbursements Cash and Investments as of F®brumy 28, 1994 $ $ 41,758,479 (3,027,608) 41,177,451 Cash and Investments Portfolio: Type of Investment Petty Cash General Checking Benefit Demand Deposits Local Agency Investment Fund Deferred Compensation Fund Deferred Compensation Fund Defined Contribution Fund Trust Accounts-TCSD COPs Trust Accounts-RDA Bonds Institution City Hall Fimt Interstate First Interstate State Treasurer ICMA PEBSCO PEB,SCO Bank of America Bank of America Ykid 4.176% 2.880% 2.880% Balance 800 330,538 6,192 27,376,386 258,997 204,847 16,870 681,180 12,301,641 41,177,451 (1) (1) (1)-This amount is net of outstanding checks. Per Government Code Requirements, this Treasurer's Report is in compliance with the City of Temecula's investment policy and them are edequ-te funds available to meet budgeted and actual expenditures of the City of Temecula for the next thirty days. Prepared by Tim McDermott, Senior Accountam City of Temecula Schedule of Fund Balances As of February 28, 1994 Total Assets $ Less: Liabilities Total Fund Balances Less: Reserved Amounts (1) Less: Designated Amounts (2) Unreserved, Undesignated Fund Balances $ Cortlrtlunity Services Redevelopment City District Agency Total 24,331,133 $ 3,306,387 $ 19,605,322 $ 47,242,892 3,037,694 540,211 457,950 4,035,855 21,293,489 2,766,176 19,147,372 43,207,037 5,245,146 1,050,758 5,814,182 12,110,086 8,752,566 1,715,418 13,333,190 23,801,174 7,295,777 $ 0 $ 0 $ 7,295,777 (1) Includes mounts reserved for encumbrances, land held for resale, long-term notes receivable, Iowlmod housing, and debt service. (2) Includes mounts designated for economic uncertainty, debt service, and continuing appropriations. ITEM 5 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY ~~, FINANCE OFFICER ' CITY MANAGER TO: FROM:+ DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AOENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Rick Sayre, Police Chief April 5, 1994 Expenditure of Asset Forfeiture Funds RECOMMENDATION: City Council authorize staff to use police asset forfeiture funds to purchase computer equipment. BACKGROUND: Criminal narcotic investigations where monies are seized can be obtained by law enforcement agencies. Currently the City of Temecula Police Department has $5,000.00 available for use. The monies seized must be used for law enforcement programs. I recommend the funds be used to purchase three computers end eight local area network, (L.A.N.), cards for use at the Police Department. The computers will be used as follows: * Traffic Team, * Shift Sergeant, * Patrol Officer Report Writer. The L.A.N. cards will be intalled in eight. existing computers, linking them onto the Police Department L.A.N. The Police Department serves as the City Hall backup information management system in the event of a disaster effecting City Hall. FISCAL IMPACT: None. Funds are accrued by Riverside County Sheriff and are used as needed. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Quote for equipment requested. ,S~,'T BY: 2-24-84; 8:4751; CITY OF TEMECbLA-. 714eiB44367;;~ 1/1 CIFY OF T~M~CUIA ~V~XMORANDUM I~XOM: SUBJECT: Rick Sayer, Chief of Polics ~°t~om Haleli, Informsimon System. Administrstor Computer Equ(pment Rtqutst DATE: February :24, 1994 WnltK,qlTATIt~N 486DX-33MHZ VBSA EA 1,310 $3,930 256K CACHE _ko~MORY 4MB RAM (BXPANDABLB TO 32MB) MINI TOW!~ CASE W/2~0~ WATI UL POWER SUPPLY 1.4 TEA(] PLOPPY DI~WB 210MB IDE HARD DRIVB (18ms MIN) I6BIT IDE CONTROLLER 2S/IP/IG PORT 16B1T SVOA ADAYlXR 101 ENHAN~ KEYBOARD MIC~OSOFr Smua~ MOUn l_~nrf 10BAS~F HIGH PEXFOItMANCI~ ~t~v-~qET CARD SVGA COLOR MONITOR .28 W/TILT & SWIVEL BASB MSDOS 6.2 ONE YBAR PARTS AND LABOR WARRANTY 8 16X~vT 10BASEF ItlGH PBRI~ORMANCE ErHERNEF CARD EA 5S S440 TAX $ 338.68 ITEM NO. 6 · APPROVAl CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: City Council/City Manager /f~Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer April 5, 1994 SUBJECT: Final Tract Map No. 27690 PREPARED ~iim D. Faul, Assistant Engineer - Land Development RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve Final Tract Map No. 27690 subject to the Conditions of Approval. BACKGROUND: Tentative Tract Map No. 27690, Amendment No. 1, was approved by the City of Temecula Planning Director, Gary Thornhill, on March 11, 1994. The Developer has met ell of the Conditions of Approval. Final Tract Map No. 27690 is a one (1) lot commercial subdivision, for condominium purposes, of 1.02 acres located on the northerly side of Winchester Road (Hwy 79 North) at the intersection of Ynez Road. 'The site is currently occupied by a medical office building. Surrounding land uses include vacant land and commercial development. The site is zoned Scenic Highway Commercial (C-P-S). The established zoning on the property conforms with the land use designation on the General Plan for the City of Temecula. The existing drainage facilities at the intersection of Winchester Road (Highway 79 North) and Ynez Road were reviewed and found to be inadequate to support additional development (Condition No. 35). The existing drainage facilities will need to be upeized as additional development occurs along the north side of Winchester Road. An Agreement for Payment of Drainage Improvement Fees will be recorded concurrently with Final Tract Map No. 27690 and similar agreements will be required for each contributing property as they are developed. c~gd~t~e4~406~TR27e~O/eke The following fees have been paid for Final Tract Map No. 27690: Area Drainage Fees Public Facilities Fee Traffic Signal Mitigation Fees Paid prior to grading permit (Cond. No. 42) Paid prior to building permit (Cond. No. 78) Paid prior to building permit (Cond. No. 74) The Agreement for Payment of Drainage Improvement Fees will be recorded concurrently with Final Map 27690 and a bond of 820,000 will be posted for this developer's fair share of drainage improvements. FISCAL IMPACT: None. ATTACHMI:NT8: 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Development Fee Checklist Project Location Map Final Tract Map No. 27690 Conditions of Approval Fees & Securities Report Agreement for Payment of Drainage 'Improvement Fee CITY OF TEMECULA DEVELOPMENT FEE CHECKLIST CASE NO.: Tract MAD No. 97690 The following fees were reviewed by Staff relative to their applicability to this project. FEE Flood Control (ADP) Public Facility Traffic Signal Mitigation CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Paid prior to grading permit (Condo No. 42) 'Paid prior to building permit (Cond. No. 78) Paid prior to building permit (Cond. No. 74) Fire Mitigation N/A Quimby N/A SITE ~CINITY .;. MaP N.T.S. SEC. 35, '1'7S, R3W, S.B.B.M. Plannina Department CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PA92-O036, Tentative Tract Map No. 27690, Amendment No. I Project Description: Approval for a condominium map .for a 9,635 ,~quare foot medical office building~ · Assessor's Parcel No.: 910-110-057 Approval Date: March 11, 1993 Expiration Date: March 11, 1995 The use hereby permitted by this approval is for medical offices. The permittee shall defend, indemnify, and hold h~rmless the City of Temecula, its agents, officers, and employees from any claims, action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula or its agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul, an approval of the City of Temecula, its advisory agencies, appeal boards, or legislative body concerning PA92-0036. The City of Temecula will promptly notify the permittee of any such claim, action, or pro~:eeding against the City of Temecula and will cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly· notify the permittee of any such claim, action or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in 'the defense, the permittee shall not,' thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City of Temecula. The. development of the premises shall conform substantially with that as shown on Plot Plan No. PA92-0036 marked Exhibit A, or as amended by these conditions. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way. The applicant shall comply with the Public Works Department's Conditions of Approval which are included herein. Water and sewerage disposal facilities shall be installed in accordance with the provisions set forth in the Riverside County Health Department's transmittal dated December 10, 1992, a copy of which is attached. -- Flood protection shall be provided in accordance with the Riverside County Rood. Control District's transmittal dated December 31, 1992, a copy of which is attached. R:I~"~'TAR=Nrr~6PAI2.DH 3/15/93 klb e 10. 11. 12. -13. 14. 15. Fire protection shall be provided in accordance with the appropriate section of Ordinance No, 546 and the County Fire Warden's transmittal dated December 17, 1992, a copy of which is attached, The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Building and Safety Department transmittal dated December 10, 1992, a c~}py of which is attached. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in-the Department of .Transportation transmittal dated December 22, 1992, q copy of which is .attached, The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Rancho Water. District transmittal dated December 23, 1992, a copy of which is attached, Prior to the issuance of grading or building permits, three {3) copies of a Parking, Landscaping, Irrigation, and Shading Plans shall be submitted to the Planning' Department for approval, The location, number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown, Plans shall meet all requirements of Ordinance No, 348, Section 18, 12, and shall be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee, All landscaped areas shall be planted in accordance with approved landscape, irrigation, and shading plans prior to the issuance of occupa.ncy permits, An automatic sprinkler system shall .be installed and all landscaped areas shall be maintained in a viable growth condition, Planting within ten (10) feet of an entry or exit driveway shall not be permitted to grow higher than thirty {30) inches, A minimum of 59 parking spaces shall be provided in accordance with Section 18.12, Riverside County Ordinance No. '348. Fifty-nine (59) parking spaces shall be provided as shown on the Approved Exhibit A. The parking area .shall be surfaced with asphaltic concrete paving to a minimum depth of 3 inches on 4 inches of Class II base. A minimum of three (3) handicapped pa.rking spaces shall be provided as shown on Exhibit A. Each parking space reserved for the handicapped shall be identified by a permanently affixed reflectorized sign constructed of porcelain on st. eel, beaded text or equal, displaying the International Symbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square inches in area and shall be centered at the interior end of the parking space at a minimum. height if 80 inches from the 'bottom Of the sign to the parking space finished grade, or centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space finished grade, ground, or sidewalk. 'A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous place, at each entrance to the off-street parking facility, not less than 17 inches by 22 inches, clearly and conspicuously stating the following: "Unauthorized vehicles not displaying distinguishing placards or license plates issued for physically handicapped persons may be towed away at owner's expense. Towed vehicles may be reclaimed at or by ...telephone In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall have a surface identification sign duplicating the Symbol of Accessibility in blue paint of at least 3 square feet in size, R:%S~qTAFFRPT~BPA92.DH 3116/93 klb 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. A Plot Plan application for a Sign Program shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Director prior to occupancy. -- -- Building elevations shall be in substantial conformance with that shown 'on Exhibit B. Materials used in the construction of all buildings shall be in substantial conforrnance with that shown on Exhibit C (Color 'Bevations), Exhibit D (Materials Board) and the following: a. ~;tucco walls on wood 'frame - La Habra Stucco X-16 'Silver Grey" b. Stucco Trim - La Habra Stucco X-50 'Crystal White" Stucco Columns - 32" Square, Silver Grey with Crystal White base and capital trim, typical. .d. Concrete Tile Roofing - Lifetile 'Super Shake' #503 'Charcoal Blend" Rain Gutter - Metal, painted white to match trim Store Front - ':-'h~*.= Teal Aluminum Mullions (Amended at Planning Director Hearing on March 11, 1993) · ." g.. Glazing - Solar Grey Canopy - Quarter Tound architectural fabric: "Teal" Roof-mounted equipment shall be architecturally screened from ground view. ' All trash enclosures shall be constructed prior to the issuance of occupancy permits. Each enclosure shall be six feet in height and shall be made with masonry block and a steel gate which screens the bins-from external view. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall comply with Ordirance No. 663 by paying.the fee required by that ordinance which is based on (the gross acreage of the parcels proposed for development} (the number of single family residential units on lots which ere · minimum of one-half (1/2) gross acre in size). Should Ordinance No. 663 be superseded by the provisions of a Habitat Conservation Plan prior to the payment of the fees required by Ordinance No. 663, the applicant shall pay the fee required under the Habitat Conservation Plan as implemented by County ordinance or resolution. Four (4) Class II bicycle racks shall be pro~/ided in convenient locations as approved by the Planning Director to facilitate bicycle access to the project area.' Prior to the issuance of building permits, performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Building and Safety to guarantee the installation of plantinge, walls, and fences in accordance with the approved plan, and adequate. maintenance of the Planting for one year, shall be filed with the Department of Building and Safety. R:%S%STAFFRPT'~BPAI2.DI.I 311 6/93 klb Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions/Reciprocal AcceSs Easements: 24. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&R's) shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department pdor to recordation. The CC&R's shall include liability insurance and methods of maintaining the open space, recreation areas, parking areas, signs, private roads, and exterior of all build. ings. 25. No lot or dwelling unit in the development shell be sold unless a corporation, association, property owner's group, or similar entity has been formed wi.th the right to asse~s all properties individually owned or jointly owned which have any rights or interest in the Use of the common areas and. common facilities in the development, such assessment power to be sufficient to meet the expenses of such entity, and with authority to control: and the duty to maintain, all of said mutually available features of the development. Such entity shall operate under recorded CC&R's which shall include compulsory membership of all owners of lots and/or dwelling units and flexibility of assessments to meet changing costs of maintenance, repairs, and services. Recorded CC&R's shall permit enforcement by the City of Provisions required by the City as Conditions of Approval. The developer shall submit evidence of.compliance with this requirement to, and receive approval of, the City prior to making any such sale. This condition shall not apply to land dedicated to the City for public-purposes. 26. Maintenance for all landscaped and open areas, including parkways, shall be provided for in the CC&R's. 27. Every owner of a unit shall own as an appurtenance to such unit, either (1) an undivided interest in the common areas and. facilities, or (2) as share in the corporation, or voting membership in an association, owning'the common areas and facilities. 28. Uhless a De Minimus finding can be made by the Planning Director, within forty-eight (48) hours of the approval of the project, the applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashiers check or money order payable to the County Clerk in the amount of One Thousand Three Hundred Dollars (el ,300.00), which includes the One Thousand Three Hundred Dollars ($1,300.00) fee, in compliance with AB 3158, required by Fish and Game Code S~ction 711.4(d)(2) plus the Fifty Dollars (e50.00) County administrative fee to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination required under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and 14 Cal. Code of Regulations 15075. If within such forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check required above, the approval for the project granted herein shall be void by reason of failure of condition, Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c). (Amended at Planning Director's Hearing on March 11,1993). PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT The following are the Department of Public Works Conditions of Approval for this project, and shall be completed at no cost to any Govemment Agency. All questions regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the appropriate staff person of the Department of Public Works. R:%S%STAFFRPT~ePA92.DH 3116/93 klb GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 29. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the tentative map all existing and proposed easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and revision. 30. A Grading Permit for either rough or precise (including all on-site flat work and improvements) construction shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained road right- of-way. -' 31. 32. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained frdm the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way. All improvement plans, grading plans, landscape .and irrigation plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing .improvements contiguous to the site, 33.. Pursuant to Section 66493 of the Subdivision Map Act, any subdivision which is part of an existing Assessment District must comply with the requirements of said section. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS 34. A copy of the grading and improvement plans. along with supporting hydrologic and hydraulic calculations shall be submitted to the Riverside County Rood Control and Water Conservation District for approval prior to recordation of the final map or the issuance of any permits. A permit from Riverside County Rood Control and Water Conservation District is 'required' for work within their Right-of-Way. 35. Supporting hydrologic calculation -shall be submitted for review for adequacy of the existing catch basin at the north east comer of Winchester Road and Ynez Road if .existing .hyd~ologlc studies submitted ere deemed inadequate by .the ~ .Engineer. Upsizing may be :required upon .a finding of insufficiency. (Amended at Planning Director's Hearing on March 11, 1993i. 36. The final grading plan shall be prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works. ~/37. The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit.from the State Water Resources Control Board. No grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI).has been filed or the project is shown to be exempt. 38. The Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: · · · · , San Diego Regional Water Quality; Riverside County Rood Control and Water Conservation District; Planning Department; Department of Public Works; R:~"~qTAFFNaI~ePA92.DH 3/1B/93 klb ,./39: 40. 41. '42. 44. · · · · · · Riverside County Health Department; Caltrans; Parks and Recreation Department; General Telephone; Southern California Edison Company; and Southern California Gas Company, A Soils Report shall be prepared by a registered Soils Engineer and submitted to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check,. The report shall address all soils .conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered structures and pavement sections, : An erosion control plan shall .be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval, Graded but undeveloped land shall be maintained in a weed free condition and shall be either planted with interim landscaping or provided with other erosion control measures as approved by the DeparTment of Public Works, A flood mitigation charge shall be paid, The charge shall equal the prevailing Area Drainage Plan .fee rate multiplied by the area of new development, The charge is payable to the Riverside County Rood Control and Water Conservation District prior to issuance of permits, If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has' already been credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid, The Developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or easements for any off- site work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public Works at no cost to any agency, A Flood Plain Development Pi~mit and Drainage Study shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval, The drainage study shall include, but not be limited to, the following criteria: .A, 'Drain;,ge and flood pr~tecti0n facilities which will protect all structures by diverting site runoff to streets or. approved storm drain facilities as directed by the Department of Public Works. Adequate provision shall be made for the acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas, The impact to the site from any flood zone as shown on the FEMA flood hazard map and any necessary mitigation to protect the site. Identify and mitigate impacts of grading to any adjacent floodway. The location of existing .:and post development 100-year floodplain and floodway shall be shown on the improvement plan. R:%S~STAFFFIPT~ePA92.1)I-I 3116/93 kib 45. 47. 48. 49. 50. PRIOR 51. 52. 53. The Developer shall accept and properly dispose of all off-site drainage flowing. onto or through the site. In the event the Department of Public Works- permits the use of streets for drainage purposes, the provisions of Section XI of Ordinance No. 460 will apply. Should the quantities exceed the street capacity, or use of streets be prohibited for drainage purposes, the Developer shall provide .adequate facilities as approved by the Department of Public Works. The Developer shall protect downstream properties fr{~m damages caused by alteration of the drainage patterns; i.e., concentration or diversion of flow. Protection shall be provided. b.y constructing adequate 'drainage facilities, including· enlarging existing. facilities or by securing a drainage easement. A drainage easement shall be obtained from'the affected property owners for the release of concentrated or diverted storm flows onto the adjacent property. A copy of the drainage easement shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for' review prior to recordation. The location of the recorded easement shall be delineated on the grading plan. The site is in an area identified on the Rood Hazard Maps as Rood Zone "A" and is subject to flooding of undetermirled depths. Prior to the approval of any plans, this project shall comply with Ordinance No. 91 ;12 of the City of Temecula, and with the rules and regulations .of FEMA for development ;within Rood Zone "A", which may include obtaining a letter of map revision from FEMA. An Encroachment Permit shall be required from Caltransfor any work within their right- of-way. ~, The Developer. shall. post security and enter into. agree...ment guaranteeing the grading and erosion control improvements in conformance ~!~h .applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works. TO THE ISSUANCE OF ENCROACHMENT PERMITS All'necessary grading-permit requirements shall have been completed and approved. 'Improvement plans, including I~ut 'not limited to, streets, parkway t~ees, street lights, driveways, drive aisles, parking lot lighting, drainage facilities and paving shall be prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer on 24' x 36" mylar sheets and approved by the Department of Public Works. Final plans (and profiles on streets) shall show the location of existing utility facilities and easements as directed by the Department of Public Works. The following criteria shall be observed in the design of the improvement plans to be submitted to the Department of Public Works: Rowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum o~er A.C. paving. B. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula standards: 207/207A, 208 and 401 (curb and sidewalk). R:~'%STAFFRPT~BPA92.DH 3/16/93 54. '55. 56. 57. 58. PRIOR 59. 60. Ce Street lights shall be installed along the public streets adjoining the site in accordance with Ordinance No. 461 and shall be shown on the improvement plans as directed by the Department of Public Works. Improvement plane shall extend 300 feet beyond the project boundaries or as otherwise approved by the Department of Public Works. All street and driveway centerline intersectione shall be at 90 degrees or as approved .by the Department of Public Works. Landscaping shall be-limitad in the comer cut-off area of all intersections and. adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility. All concentrated drainage directed towards the public street shall be conveyed through under-sidewalk drains. Improvement plans per City Standards for the private streets or drives shall be required for review and approval by the Department of Public Works. All utility systems including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer, and cable TV shall be provided for underground, with easements provided as required, and designed and constructed in accordance with City Codes and the utility provider. Telephone, cable TV, and/or security systems shall be pre'wired. All utilities, except electrical lines rated 33kv or greater, shall be installed underground. All conditions of the grading permit and encroachment permit shall be complied with to the satisfaction of the Public Works Department. A construction area traffic control plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer for any street closure and detour or other disruption to traffic circulation as required by the Department of Public Works. TO RECORDATION OF FINAL MAP Any 'delinquent property taxes shall be paid. The Developer shall construct or post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the construction of the following public improvements within 18 months in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works. Street improvements, which may include, but are not limited to: pavement, curb and gutter, sidewalks, drive approaches, street lights, signing, traffic signals and other traffic control devices as appropriate. B. Storm drain facilities C. Landscaping (dopes and parkways). -. D. Erosion control and slope protection. R:'~S~qTAFFRPT'~38PA82.DH 3/I El83 Idb 61. 62. 63. 64. 65. 66. Sewer and domestic water systems.. All trails, as required by the City's Master Plans. Undergrounding of proposed utility distribution lines. As deemed necessary by the Department of'Public WorkS., the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: San Diego Regional Water QUality; : Rancho California Wa:ter District; Eastern Municipal Water District; Riverside County Rood Control 'and Water Conservation District; City of Temecula Fire Bureau; Planning Department; Department of Public Works; Riverside County Health Department; CATV Franchise; Caltrans; Parks and Recreation Department; General Telephone; Southern California Edison Company; and Southern California Gas COmpany Legal all-weather access as required by Ordinance No. 460 shall be provided from the tract map boundary to a paved City maintained road. All road easements and/or street dedications shall be offered for dedication 'to the ptjblic and shall continue in force until the 'City accepts or abandons such offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the Department of Public Works. A 67 foot half width right of way shall be dedicated along Winchester Road. A 25 foot wide easement. along the southerly tract map boundary shall be dedicated for the Transportation Corridor. The Developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site property interests, and if he or she should fail to do so, the Developer shall, prior to submittal of the final map for recordation, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act, Section 66462 and Section 66462.5. Such agreement shall provide for payment by the Developer of all costs incurred by the City to acquire the off-site property interests required in connection with the subdivision. Security of a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the Developer, at the Developer's cost. The appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal. Vehicular access shall be-restricted on Winchester Road and Ynez Road and so noted on the final map with the exception of access as shown on the site plan .as approved by the Department of Public Works. R:'~S'~q"rAFFIFT~BPA92.DH 3/16/93 idb 67, 68. 71. 72. 73. 74. 75. A Transportation Demand Management program will be required. A 28 foot easement shall be dedicated for public utilities and emergency vehicle access for all private streets and drives across adjacent parcels I and 3 of Parcel Map 23335. Reciprocal access easements and maintenance agreements .ensuring access to all parcels and joint maintenance of all roads, dr, ives or paring areas shall be provided by CC&R's or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrent with the map. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be required and shall be delineated and noted on the final map. An easement for a joint use driveway shall be provided prior to recordation of the Final Map or ise~'~tc~'of building permits, whichever occurs tim.' Easements, when-required for roadway slopas, landscape easements, drainage .facilities, utilities, etc., shall be shown on the final map if they are located within the land. division boundary. All offers of dedication and conveyances shall be submitted for review and recorded as directed by the Department of Public Works. On-site drainage facilities located outside of road right-of-way shall be contained within drainage easements and shown on the final map. A note shall be added to the final map stating 'drainage easements shall be kept free of buildings and obstructions." Prior to recordation of the final map, an Environmental Constraints Sheet (ECS) shall be. prepared in conjunction with the final map to delineate identified environmental concerns and shell be permanently filed with the office of the City Engineer. A copy· of the ECS shall be transmitted to the Planning Department for review and approval. The following information shall be on the EC$: A.' The delineation of the area within the 100 - year floodplain. B. Special Study Zones. The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an Environmental C0nst. raint Sheet rec~orded with any underlying maps related to the subject property. Prior to recordation of the final map, the Developer shall deposit with the Department of Public Works a cash sum as established, per lot, as mitigation towards traffic signal ~ impacts. Should the developer choose to defer the time of payment of traffic signal mitigation fee, he may enter into a written agreement with the City deferring said payment to the time of issuance of a building permit. Prior to recording the final map, the subdivider shall notify the City's CATV Franchises of the Intent to Develop. Conduit shall be installed to CATV Standards at time of street improvements. R:%S~qTAFFRPT%36PAI2.DH 3/15/93 kJb PRIOR 76. 77: 78. PRIOR 79. 80. 81. 82. 83. TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS A precise grading plan shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval. The building pad shall be certified by a registered Civil Engineer for location and elevation, and the Soils Engineer shall issue a Final Soils Report addressing compaction and site conditions. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, the approved grading plan, the conditions of the grading permit, City Grading Standards and accepted grading construction practices, The final-grading plan shall be in substantial Conformance with.the approved rough grading plan', The Developer shall pay any.capital fee for road improvements and public facilities imposed upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public facility mitigation as required under the EIR/Negstive Declaration for the project. The fee to be paid shall be in the amount in effect at the time of payment of the fee. If an interim or final public facility mitigation fee or district has not been finally established by the date on which the Developer requests its building permits for the project or any phase thereof, the Developer shall execute the Agreement for payment of Public Facility fee, a copy of which has been provided to the Developer. Concurrently, with executing this Agreement, the Developer shall post a bond to secure payment of the Public Facility fee. The amount of the bond shall be ~2.00 par square foot, not to exceed $10,000. The Developer understands that said Agree .ment may require the payment of fees in excess of those now estimated (assuming benefit to the project in the amount of such fees). By execution of this Agreement, the Developer will waive any right to protest the provisions of this Condition, of this Agreement, the formation of any traffic impact fee district, or the process, levy, or collection of any traffic mitigation or traffic impact fee for this project; provided that the Developer is not waiving its right to protest the reasonableness of any traffic impact fee, and the amount thereof. TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY All impr0vem~nts shall be completed end in place per the approved planS, including but not limited to, curb and gutter, A,C. pavement, sidewalk, dri~/e approaches, drainage facilities, parkway trees and street lights on all interior public streets, The Developer shall provide 'stop' 'controls at the intersection of local access streets with arterial streets as directed by the Department of Public Works. Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersection and adjacent to driveways to'provide for minimum.sight distance as directed by the Department of Public' Works. Two 28 foot' wide secondary .a..C.cess roads to Winchester Road and Ynez Road respectively; shall be constructed within a recorded private road easement as'approved by the Department of Public WorkS.' Asphaltic emulsion (fog seal) shall be applied only as directed by the Department of Public Works at a rate of 0.05 gallon per square yard. Asphalt emulsion shall conform to Section Nos. 37, 39, and 94 of the State Standard Specifications. R:q~"%STAFFFF~36PAI2.DH 3116/93 klb County of Riverside HEALTH SERVICES AGENCY TO: FROM: RE: CITY OF TEMECULAPLANNING DEPT. onmental Health Specialist IV 'TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 27690 12-10-92 The Department of Environmental Health has reviewed the Tentative Parcel Map No. 27690 for this project and cannot make any recommendations until a sanitation letter is filed. The requirements for a SAN 53 letter are as follows: Should the project be served sanitary sewer services, this Department would need only: 1. A "Will-serve" letter from the agency/agencies serving potable water and sanitary sewers. 2. One copy of the Parcel Map. SM:dr '(909) 275-8980 RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT RECEIVED JAN 0 7 1993 Ans'd ............ or, .... e.~ta/rs:= .... erdatiom for such case am rmemdly limited Io items o( spedtic interest to the Disaict including District Mailer Drainage Plan faci~ities~th~rregi~na~dc~m~iarddrdn~gefacid~whk:hmu~dbec~:d~r~d~gicd~xr~ Aor__a~___ansi~ofamasmrplansystem, and District Area Drainage Ran fees (d-AIoF.,~e.A ,,~g "~ri fees). In addition, i~,,ddon of · geneed nature is Ixovided. This project would not be impacted by District Master Drainage FqBn facHtlies nor are oear facilities of regiend interest This Ixc~ect involves District Master h facilities. The Dislfict will accept ownership oe such facilities on written request of the City. Facilities ' must be constructed to Dislfk:t ~'-~:1s, d$, 8nd Dimfk:t plan check and ineFe,~i~n will be required for District ~ccx~t-Y,s. Plin check, · and/or a logical extermion of the adopted Master Drainago Plan. Tho District would consider ~eeshav~been~d~pted;~ic~b~ee~muidbep~dt~heF~dC~m~:~str~ct~rC~ty~xi~rt~rmi approval of the lxoject. or in the case of aparcel map or subdivision prior to reco~alion of lhe-finaJ map. Fees to be pajd shouid be at the rate in e~ect ,e the time ol reeordao~ ' or ff deferred, at ~ time of issu&'ce of the actual permiT. GFNFRAI INFtlR"ATII~N This pmiect may require, National Pdlutmt Dim eimina~ System (NPDES) pemit from the Stm Water Resources Co,-~,~; Board. Clearane for grading, recordalion, ot other final approval,' should not be given until the City ria$ detm'rnined tha~ 1he project h-J been granted · pertnit or is shown to be exempt. ~lhis proiect involves 8 Feclefid F.,~e.gvn~.y Management Agency (FEMA) mapped flood piain. then the Clty should require the apllcant to · provide adl sttxte$.cak::uiation$.l:dnsndotherinformlionrsquimdtonaetFEMArlDIJ; s.,.I 4s. and $tvxid furthsr require ttafthe a;pticant obtain a~ Letter of MsD Revision (CLOMR) Imor to grltng, recordation or mher finaj approval oilhe Ixoiect, and a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) prior to occupancy. I! a naturaj watercourse or maDIxd flood plain is imlacmd by this ;x'oject the City should rm3uire the al~licant. to obtain 8 Section 1601/1603 AgreememfromtheC41ifomiaDap- h,~am of Rsh and Game and a Clean Watef Act Section 404 Permit from the U-S- ArmY C~Ps ol Engineers, or written ooffespofidlr. cl from i ligeflciel indicBdlng ~e ixoject is exempt from thef4 requiremerits. A Cleall Wltlr Act Section 404 Water Quality Certfficatjon nay be required from the local Cairoalia RegiofiaJ Water QuaJity Control Board prior to issuance of 01i Corps 404 permit. Very truly yours, ,,~/, DUSTYWILUAMS c: o-.: I ?- ' 5 t - ¢t ?-- F(NIM: P. O1 RIV. E SIDE COUNTY December 17, 1992 · To: ATTN: TEMECULA' CITY PLANNINe DF.7~LI:~'T'D'IE~I'fl' ~ied Naaseh Tract :27690. With .reupect ta thec~ndltiuns of approval regarding the above referenced plot plans the Fire Department. recommends the rallY- ing fire pr~utecti~ mtesures be provi~ in acca~ce ~ith Riverside C~nty 0rdin~ces ~d/~r recognized fire protection standards: 1. T,he fire Oepartet is required to set a minimum'fire ~or the re~el or const~tion of all c~erclal buildings using the procedure established in Ordinance ~ Provide or shah there exlsts a~ter mymtem capable of / delivering 1500 8~ ~or a Z ~ur ~ur~tlon at 20 PSI r~idual operating pressure, which must .be available' before any combustible uterlal ls placed on the Job site, S- Applic~/Devel~r shell be responsible .to submit written Certificate= from t~ water c~ny noting the location the existing fire hydrant ~d that the existing water system is capable of delivering 1500 ~ fire fl~ for a hour -duration at 20 PSI residual o~ratlng pressure.,. If water system ~rr~tly ~as not exist, the appllcant/~r yeloper shall be responsl.~Ie to provl~e writt~ certifica- tion that financial arrangem~ts have been made to provide A combination of on--site and off-slte super fire hydrants (6"M4"~2 112"x2 1/2"), Hill be located not less than 2~ feet pr more than 165 feet from any portion of the building as measured along approved vehicular travel NayS. The required fire flow shall.be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. Department. · :7..f,J, TT1 · ~AX C/.141,16t,74Sl Blue tetrareflective pN~,vea~,ent markers shall be'-mountedon private streets, moblie streets and drivewayS tO Indicate* locati~ of fire hydrants. Prior to Installationt place..~mnt of markers must be aDprDved by the'Riverside County FAre (JIll It:l-Illl rl~ i'tlll la,I''7~ri REt TR276~0 Page 2 Appltcant/DevmlDPer s~all separately submit two copy of the' water mystem plans to the Fire Department" for raylee. Plans shall conform to the fire hydrant tYl~m location end spacing, and the system shall meet the fare flow requlre- nientso Plans shall be signed/apprgved by a registered civil engineer and the local-Hater company Htth the following certificmti~n3 "Z certify that the design o~ the water system ls in accordance wlth the requirements prescribed Dy the Riverside C~unty Fire Department"- Install a complete fire.,Drink.let system in all buildings requiring. a..fire flDH Of 1500 8PM or greater, The po~t indicator valve and fire department connection shall be located to .the fruntm wlthln DO feet of a hydrants and a minimum of 2D feet from the building(s)~ A statement that the building(s) will be automatically fire sprinkled must be included on the title page of the building plans- Applicant/O~veloper mhall be responsible-to install e U,L, Central' Station Monitored Fire Alarm System, That monitors fire ~prinkler syStem-Hater flOWs P,Z,V,'I an~ all control valves. Plans must be submitted to the Fire Department for approve1 prior to lnstallati~n- A statement that the building Hill be automatically fire sprinkled must appear ~n the title page of the building .plant- Comply with Title 19. of' the California Administrative Code. FIRE tANkS 11. The applicant shall.prepare and submit to the Fire Depart- ment for approvalm a site plan designating requ£red fire lane~ ~ttn appropriate lane painting end/Or signs- Install p~rtable fire extinguishers with a minimum ratlng of 2A-iOBC and signage- Fire Extinguishers located in public areas snail be in recessed cabinets mounted 48' (inches) to center above floor level with maximum 4" (inch)' pr~ecti~n from the wall- C~ntact Fire Department for proper placement of equipment prior to installation- BUXLDXNB(s) Know Key lock boxes shall be lnstaile~ on all buildings/ suites- If building/suite requires Hazardous Material Reporting (Material Safety Data ~heete) the ~nox HAZ MAT Data and key storage cabinets shall be installed, If b~lldings/suites are protected b~ a fire or ~Urglar alarm system, the ~o~e~ will require vTamper' ~. T8 27&c~0 Pa~e monitoring. Plane must be eubmitt~d to the Fire .'DepartJaent for approval prior to installation. · 14. Prior t~ issuance of bulldin~t permits. the applicant/de- valeper sh~ll be responsible to submit a check or mone~ -'order in the amount ~f $~58,00 to the Riverside County Fire' Department for plan check fees, DISPLAY. ~OARDS Display Boards: Display boards reqbired for apartments, · condominiumss' recreatlonal vehicle parks and mobile home parks will ~e' as followsl EXA~LE~ Each compleH shall. have an illuminated diagrammatic representation of the- actual layout which shows name of complex, all streetsf .building. deeignators, unit members, .and fire hydrant locations within the. complex. These directories. shall be a minimum 4'x4' in dimension-and located ne~t t= roadway access, 16- Final conditions wilt be addressed when building plans are reviewred in the Building and Safety Office, .. ~ues~ions regarding the .meaning of conditions shall be re- Division· All /erred to' the Riverside County. Fire Department Planning ~aff. RAYMOND H. RES I S Chief Fire Department Planner 'Fire Safety Specialist DRC CONDITIONS-BUILDING AND SAFETY CASE NO..~:~ A c;} ?_-Go5 (¢= ,~. COMPLY WITH APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF THE 1991 EDITION OF THE- UNIFORM BUILDING, PLUMBING AND MECHANICAL; 1990 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE; CALIFORNIA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE TITLE 24 ENERGY AND HANDICAPPED REGULATIONS AND THE TEMECULA CODE. LIGHT POLLUTION. 3. OBTAIN ALL BUILDING PLAN AND PERMIT APPROVALS PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY CONSTRUCTION WORK. ~X~. OBTAIN STREET ADDRESSING FOR ALL PROPOSED BUILDINGS PRIOR TO rSUBMITTAL FOR PLAN REVIEW. 5. PROVIDE OCCUPANCY APPROVAL FOR ALL EXISTING BUILDINGS (i.e. finaled building permit, Certificate of Occupancy) ~'6."' ALL ~ BUILDINGS AND FACILITIES MUST COMPLY WITH 'APPLICABLE HANDICAPPED ACCESSIBILITY REGULATIONS. /)<~'. PROVIDE HOUSE ELECTRICAL METER PROVISIONS FOR POWER FOR THE RATION OF EXTERIOR LIGHTING, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS. TE 8. RESTROOM FIXTURES, NUMBER AND TYPE, TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH PROVISIONS OF THE 1991 EDITION OF THE UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE, APPENDIX C. 9. PROVIDE AN APPROVED AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM. 10. PLANS ARE NOT· SUFFICIENT FOR REVIEW AND CONDITIONING. 11. NO COMMENTS AT THIS TIME. /~2. PROVIDE APPROPRIATE STAMP OF A REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL WITH O~3.tNAL SIGNATURE ON PLANS SUBMITTED FOR.PLAN REVIEW.- PROVIDE ELECTRICAL PLAN INCLUDING LOAD CALCS AND PANEL SCHEDULE, PLUMBING SCHEMATIC AND MECHCANICAL PLAN FOR PLAN REVIEW. BUILDING AND SAFETY STATE OF CAUFO RNIA~NES5, TRANSPOIfrATION AND HOUSING AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 8, P.O. 8OX 231 SAN 8ERNARDING, CA 92402 TDD (714) ~ December 22, 1992 'RECEIVED JAN 0 % 1993 Development Review '08-Riv~79-R2;53± Your Reference: TTM 27690 Mr. Saied Naaseh Planning Department City of Temecula City Hall. 43172 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92390 .Dear Mr. Naaseh: Thank you for the opportunity to review the proposed Tentative Tract Map 27690 (Parcel 2 of PM 23335) located on the northerly side of Highway 79 (Winchester Road) and easterly of Ynez Road in Temecula. Please refer to the attached material on which our comments have been indicated by the items checked and/or by those items noted under additional comments. If any work is necessary within the State highway right of way, the developer must obtain an encroachment permit from the Caltrans District 8 Permit Office prior to beginning work. Please be advised that this is a conceptual review only. Final approval of Street improvement, grading and drainage will. be determined durihg the Encroachment'Permit process.- If additional information is desired, please call Mr. Ahmad Salah of our Development Review Section at (714) 383-5908. G.A. LUNT' Branch Chief, Development Review Attachment Ymm lbFBtmlCE /"' \1 __ 8r.,':v,':f( WT~,.)i.,.,,:.dlCT I:h. AN. CHECKat ( co RTE PM) W~ PaC}IIEBT TH~T T~B ITNNN C2N~CEF, D BNLOW BN INC~L~DF~D IN TH~ CONDITIONS. OF APPROVAL POP. THIN IFRC)U~s __.~NGp.14aL fd~/ RIGlIT OF gAY HEDICATICN TO PRaVIDE MLF-'dIDTN GN TIE S1;ATE NIGHgAY. · HALF.--VZDTH OI-TIE STATE lEGSlaY, i AND GUTTER~ STATE STAIBARD As? , TYPE- ~9-8 AUNG THE STATE HZGHVAY, KZHG SHALL BE PitOllltTgD ALgIG TIE STATE NZGIMY ST TIE ~ PLACSENT OF I10 PARKING SZGNS, 35 FT HADZUS CUB REllaUIS gALL HE PROVIDED AT iIiEdECTIOMS BETH TIE STATE gIG&fAY. STATE STANDARD NBP/1~88# (:::~U]lle--]L laiEEU:NAIR RANP'I SHALL BE PROVIDED iN TNE anti RWrtMNS AS DEFINED IN THE NIGNi,/AY DESIGN NANHAL, BECTZml 10S.4 (2). A IK3SITIVE VFJIIGULJUt I/dRIB! ALalG TEE PIK3PERTY FIIf3NTA~E BEALL BE PROVIDED TO LIMIT PHYSICAL ACCI'SS TO THE STATE NIGNIMY, VEHICULAR ACCESS SIL4LL NOT HE* DEVEU3P~ D!IIF~rLY TO THE STATE NimadAY, TO THE STATE NIGlaMY BEAI.L BE PtOVlDfD ST GISTIN KIILIC ImD CtmNECTIaNS. VEHICUUUt A(3:F. SS TO THE STATE NIGllklAY INALL BE FIOVIDED ST / STNIONIO IVEHAYa~, VEHIClUR ~ SIIML NOT BE ~ f,,TnOII OF TIE amsr.,,__,.asGN AT VEHICULAR ACCESS TO TIll STATE NIGJ&IAY SHALL BE PROV~ .IT' A HIMD--TYPf ClMIECTIOJl. VEHICULAR .ACCESS CONNECTICNIS SHALl. HE' PAVED AT LEAST VETNIl fiE* STATE NIGHBAY lIGHT OF BAY. · ACC:ZSS POINTS TO THE STATE NIGH'dAY SHALL IE OEVEU3PB 'iN A IIANNER' .THAT BILL .PIK)VIDE EIGHT DISTANCE FOR . IIPH ALgIG THE STATE NIGINAY, lANDSCAPING ALONG THE STATE NIGH%MY SHALL I:IIOVIDE Fat SAFE $1GNT DISTANCE, CatPLY VZTN FZXB) OBJECT SET HACK AN~ BE TO STATE STANDANDS, A LEFT--IIJ~ LANE, INCUI)ING SliOJLDERS JUB ANY HEEESSAItY BIDBIINGr SULL BE PtQVIDED GN TIE STATE gIGNAY, A TRAFFIC STLUY INDICATING GN AND OFF""'SZTE FLCM PATTERNS AND VOUMESf PRg'ae!Ic *INPACTS ANO PtOPOSD MITIGATION IF. ASURES SIMLL BE PREPNEED,, ,/ PASKING SNAIL BE I)fVELf31qD IN A HANNB THAT BILL lOT CAUSE ANY VE!IIG. AJJl NOVB4ENT CalFLICTSf 181L~IH6 PJUUCING STALL EITllANC~ AND EXITr BITNIH OF TEE BITRAICZ FIU3N TIll STATE HIGHBAY, CARE BEALL BE TJUCIN blEN DIW. L~ING TOll PlU3PIRTr TO PIIflIRVE AND PBIPETUATE THE EXISTING INULINAGE PATTERN OF THE STATE NIGIMY. PASTICIJUUI CCNSIDEIATEGN BEa]LD BE GIrtH TO CllaJLATIW INI2EASED STAIN RI. IOFF TO IJlIIRE THAT A NIGHNAY DRAINAGE RKILEN 15 NOT CItF. ATED. ' PLEASE HEFBt TO ATTACHED A~OETZCllAL Ca!4E)fil. PROVIDE TO APPLICANT, CCmSTMJCTIIII/hlTiON HITHIm PRESEwr ON ~ STATE RIGlIT OF ImY BlOW M IIIVIITIGATED loft POTENTIAL K~IPRCUS MASTT ( I,E.ASIESTOSt P, tatOu~41~ ETC, ) AND HITIGATED AS PEt REQUIREMENTS OF llGULATCIY AGENCIES. WHEN PLANS ARE SUINITTED; PLI COlill)IN li TIE REBJUtENENTS OF THE ATT'.ACNEI) NHANDOL/Tm, s~ll!S UILL EXPEDITE TeE lEViif PRO~ES AND TIll REOUIRED Fat PLAN (bE{l(, PRO V]:D]!: ~qC) APPF~TCA.q~, ALTHOUGH TIE TRAFFIC ,AND/II D/AIM GEIIRA~ IY TEll I~ DO NOT APPEAR TO NAVE A SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE STATE 'HIGHgAY SYSTB4# CONSIDERATION lIST IE 61~1Jl TO THE CIMIJLATIVE EFFECT OF COHTIHLID DEV~.LOPIINT 'IN THIS ARRA,. ANY IIASIMES IEC~SSARY TO NITIGATE THE ;MIJIJkTIVE INPACT OF 11A/FIC MO/ON DRAINAGE SNAIl. IE *PROVIDED PRIGIt TO 0R VITH DEVELOPMENT OF THE AREA THAT llCF. SSITATES TEEM°- CGllSIDERATION SHALL BE GI1~rJI TO THE PROVISIONt 0it FUTLltE PROVIS~If' OF SIGNILIZATION Ale LIGHTING OF-THE llllTecsrTICN OF NB 111 STATE NIBllY klBI IdlUNTS ME HET. ZT APPtARS THAT THE TRAFFIC AND/ON DRAINA6E IENERA~ IY 1115 P:KIPOSAI. ~ HAVE A SlONIFIC~dlT EFFECT ON THE STATE 'HIGHIdAY SYSTEN OF THE AREA, ANY 14EASIMES TO MITIGATE THE TRAFFIC ANO/Oit DIAlRAGE lieACTS SItALL IE INCLLgED I~[TH THE DEVELOPHENT, · H!S PQtTION OF THE STATE NIGINAY 15 INGJI)D IN Tll CALIr43itNIA MASTER ~ OF STATE HIGHVAYS ELIGIILE OFFICIAL SCENIC HIGNUAY DESIGNATION AND IN THE FUTtME YI3Uit AGENCY HAY VISH TO NAVE THIS RCUTE OFFICIALLY DESIGNATED AS A STATE SCENIC HIGHtdAY, '* THIS PoetsON OF THE STATE HIGHIMY HAS. SEEN OFFICIALLY DESIGNATED AS A STATE SCINIC .HIGHUAY7 JUiO DEVELOPl4k'~ IN THIS CCIRIIXI SHGULD IE C6t~ATIILE VlTN THE SCENIC NIGifi/AY ZT IS RECI3glIZED THAT THEHE IS CONSIDERABLE PUBLIC I:GNCERN ABGUT NOISE LIVEIS N)JACENT TO 'IIEAVILY TRAVEL. HIGHUAYS, :LATE DEVELOPHENT~ IN ORDER TO BE CCMPATIBLE VITN THIS CONCERNf HAY IEOUIIE SPECIAL NOIS~ ATTFJeJATl~3k' PLEASURES, DEVEL(PHENT OF THIS PROP~TT SHaJI~. INCLLI)E ANY llI:F. SSARY NOISE ATTENUATION° CA~,TRJ~'4S DISTeICT 8 DEVELONENT ]bsvzif IkANCH . P,O, ~ 231 SAN BEHHANOlNO, CA 92402 /2~ COPY OF ANY CaNOITIONS OF APPItOVAL ON REVISE~ APPROVAL, A C:¢3PY OF ANY IXX:W4ENTS PROVIDING ADOITII3AL STATE HIGI!IIY RIGHT OF IdAY UPON 'SECCIDATION-OF THE bY ImOPOSALS TO FURTHER DEVELOP THIS PROPERTY. __ A CI)PY OF THE TRAFFIC ON ENVIR(Ne!NTAL STI~Yo QIEaC PRINT OF TIE PARCEL ON ~q~eACT NAP. CHiC:I[ PRINT OF TI! ~ FOR ANY I~S glTHIi IX ~DJACENT TO THE STATE NIGHtdAY RIGHT. OF 1MY. CHECI( PRINT OF THE GRADING ANO ]:)ItAINAGE PUUIS FOR TIllS Ptl)PEItTY IN AVAILAILE., ._, f December 23, 1~92 RECEIVED DEC 2 8 1992 ............ I~ard of Directors: Cuba F. Ko DouglLs V. Kulberg ~r, Vk-e P~;dent Ralph H. Dally · ~aan~y K, Hugires Jeffrey ], ,Minkier Lisa D. Peterson Richard D, :Steffey Ofilcer,~: · John F. Hennigar Phillip L Forbes /F--J*. '~ob" Lemons .,~dneth C. DeaJy Perry R. Louck Linda M. Fregoso Mt~jormick. Kidman & Behren~ Mr. Saicd Naaseh' City of Temecula Plnnnlng Department 43180 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 Water Availability Tract No. 27690 Dear Mr. N88sch: Please be advised thnt the above-referenced property is located within the boundaries of Rancho California Water District CRCWD). Water service, therefore, would be available upon completion of financial arrangements between RCWD and the property owner. Water availability would be contingent upon the property owner signing an Agency Agreement which assigns water management rights, if any, to RCWD. If you have any questions, please contact Ms. Senga Dohcrty. Sincerely, RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT St B P eve rannon, .E. Manager of Development Engineering SB:Sl):eb~8\FIM cc: Senga Doherty, Engineering Technician CITY OF TEMECULA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT TRACT MAP NO. 27690 IMPROVEMENTS Street and Drainage Water Sewer TOTAL DATE: April 5, 1994 FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE MATERIAL & LABOR SECURITY * SECURITY * s 0.00 I 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 Maintenance Retention Monument Security * Note: $ 0.00 $ 0.00 The Agreement for Payment of Drainage Improvement Fee will be recorded concurrently with Final Map 27690 and a bond of $20,000 wil be posted for this developer's fair share of drainage improvements. DEVELOPMENT FEES · City Traffic Signing and Striping Costs RCFCD Drainage Fee Paid Fire Mitigation Fee Signal Mitigation Fee - Paid Road and Bridge Benefit Fee Other Development Fees $ 0.00 $ 1,053.69 $ NIA $ 2,550.00 $ N/A $10,000.00 SERVICE FEES Planning Fee Comprehensive Transportation Plan Plan Check Fee Inspection Fee Monument Inspection Fee Letter of Map Revision (LOMAR Review) Fees Paid to Date Balance of Fees Due 102.00 8.00 770.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 880.00 0.00 CITYOFTEMECULA 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA .92590 Arm: City Clerk AGRF-~ FOR PAYMENT OF DRAINAGE IMPRO~ FF, F~ This Agreement is made this day of ,1994 by and between the City d Temecula, a municipal corporation, ('City') and Kelly J. O'Neil, M.D., an individual, Ramzi Kattan, M.D., an individual, Byron P. Sansore, D.D.S., an individual, and Anthony Young, D.C., an individual, collectively, (the *Doctors*). I~PClTA~ -~ A. The Doctors are the oneis of the following real l,gopaty (the 'Property') in the City of Temecula: Parcel 2 of Parcel Map 23335. The legal description of the Property is described in Exhibit 'A ', attached hereto and inwzlnmd herein by reference. B. The Doctors propose to' develop the Plopc~ty pursuant to Tentative Tract Map No. 27690 Amendment No. 1, approved on March 11, 1993 by the City of Temecula (the C. City has determined that the Project will impact drainage facilities within the City as identified in the Condition No. 35 for the Project. These impacts must be mitigated by payment of a fee as a condition of development, or partia'pafion in an assessment district for additional drainage facility construction, which fee or assessment district shall be identified as the "Drainage Improvement Fee." D. Subject to compliance with all public hearing procedures and applicable hw, the City proposes to impose the Drainage Improvement Fee upon new dev~opments within Parcels 1 through 5 of Parcel Map 23335, and Parcels 1 through 5 of Parcel Map 26852 in the City of Temecula, as shown on Bxhibit "C" attached hereto, in order to construct additional drainage facility improvements (the 'hnprovemonts") to serve and benefit those new developments, including the Project. E. The City has determined the estimated costs of additional drainage facility improvements as shown on Bxhibit "B* attached hereto. The costs have been distributed on a pro-ram basis according to the acreage of the benefitted lots to determine the estimated Drainage Improvement Fee .for the Project. F. In order for the Doctors to proceed with the Project without full payment of the Drainage Improvement Fee in a timely manner, the City and the Doctors have determined to enter into this Agreement. G. The term "drainage facility' shall refer to public drainage and flood control facilities, and .similar public infrasmicUn'e. NOW, Ti~PI~ORE, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. r~in~e Inlprovement Fee (a) The City Council will. establish the mount of the Drainage Improvement Fee in the future. The Fee will be based upon the acreage of each development against the total acreage of all available lots benefitted by the Improvements. The Drainage Improvement Fee shall also establish the specific drainage facility to be constructed and their cost, the benefit assessment area and the method by which the fair share, pro-tara obligations of each property are to be established based on the demand for the Improvements. In no event, however, shall the Drainage Improvement Fee for the Project exceed one hundred twenty-five percent (125%) of the estimated Drainage Improvement Fee established in Exhibit *B* to this Agreement. (b) In lieu of immediate payment of the estimated Drainage Improvement Fee the Doctors may provide seattity for the estimated Drainage Improvement Fee pursuant to Section 2 of this Agreement. Upon five days written demand from the City, which may be made at any time, the Doctors shall pay the City the estimated Drainage Improvement Fee or any punion thereof, in order to pay for the formation of the financing mechanism of the Drainage Improvement Fee and the design and constn.,ction of the Improvements. (c) When the Drainage Improvement Fee is established, the Doctors shah pay the City the Fee within five days of receiving written notice from the City. Any estimated Drainage Improvement Fee previously paid shah be a credit against the Drainage Improvement Fee. (d) When the Drainage Improvement Fee is established by the City Council, the Doctors will be reimbursed for any difference between the estimated Drainage Improvement Fee previously paid and the Drainage Improvement Fee if the estimated Drainage Improvement Fee exceeds the Drainage Improvement Fee. (e) The City shah record a release of this Agreement upon payment of any Drainage Improvement Fee owing and shah provide Doctors with a copy of such release. (f) As part of paying the Drainage Improvement Fee, Doctors may be required to participate in an assessment district, drainage district, or other financing mechanism based upon their fair share apportionment. 2. Security for the r~in~,e Improvement Fee (a) Concurrent with the execution of this Agreement, Doctors shall provide an in'evocable letter of credit or other form of bond approved by the City, in a form approved by the City Attorney, in an amount equal to the estimated Drainage Improvement Fee for the Project, plus twenty five percent (7.5 ~) of the estimated amount. Co) As an alternative to collecting the fee from the letter of credit or bond, if the Doctors fail to pay the Drainage lmprovement Fee within thirty (30) days of the date the demand is made, the City my assess a penalty of ten percent (10%) of the amount owing and make said Fee, inclusive of penalty, a Hen upon the described real pwpeaty by recording a notice that said Fee is due under the terms of this Agreement with the County Recorder of Riverside County. The notice shall state the fact that it is unpaid and draws interest on the Fee and penalty at the rate set forth at California Revenue & Taxation Section 19269 until paid. (c) The City may as an alternative to the lien procedure set forth above, bring legal action to collect the Drainage Improvement Fee due. The Doctors agree that if legal action by the City is necessary to collect the Fee, the Doctors shall pay the City a reasonable sum as attorney's fees and court costs, together with penalty and interest determined according to paragraph 4(b) of this Agreement. 3. Agreement Runs With 1 ~nd This Agreement pertains to and runs with the Property. This Agreement binds the successors in interest of each of the parties. 4. nindinl, Agreement This Agreement shah be binding upon Doctors, Doctors' successon and assigns. 5. Amendment/No Continuing Wniver This Agreement may be modified or mended only in writing, signed by both parties. This Agreement contains the full and complete understanding of the parties and supersedes any and all prior oral or written agreements or xzprese. ntations. A waiver of any term or condition of this Agreement by either party shall not be deemed a continuing waiver thereof. 6. Attom~y's Fees Should either party determine that it is necessary to file a'legal action to enforce or intctpret the provines of this Agreement, the prevailing party in that litigation shah be entitled to its reasonable costs, including but not limited to attomey's fees. mUnndd,vX~. -t.Asf/ats Notice shah be deemed given under this Agreement when in writing and deposited in the United States mail, first-class, postage prepaid, addressed as follows: CITY: DOCTORS: City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 Temecula Medical Park Dev., G.P. c/o Byron Sansore, D.D.S. 40975 ~V'mchester Road Temecula, CA 92591 8. Misce!lnneous Provisions A. If any provision of this Agreement is adjudged invalid, the remaining provisions shall not be affected. B. If there is more than one (1) signer of this Agreement as Doctors, their obligations are joint and several. IN WrFNF_SS WHERBOF, the parties or their duly authorized representatives have executed this Agreement as of the date set out above. ~- crrY o~ ~ DOCTORS By: Tim D. Serlet, Director Public Works/City Engineer ATTEST: June S. Greek City Clerk Kelly J. O'Neil, M.D. Byron R. Sansore, D.D.S. APPROVED AS TO FORM: Anthony Young, D.C. Scott F; Field City Attorney a:~sdd,v~io,~ -s-AW.~s EXHIBIT "A" I EnAI DFSCRIPTION PARCEL 2 OF PARCEL MAP 23335 AS RECORDED IN BOOK 172, PAGES 87 THROUGH 89, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. EXHIBIT "B" ESTIMATFD COSTS OF ADDITIONAl DRAINAn; FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS A, Estimated Engineering Deign Costs B, Estimated Plan Check and Inspection Fees ' (calculated per Engineer's estimate dated 8-25-93) C, 'Estimated Construction Costs (calculated per Engineer's estimate dated 8-25-93) D, . Estimated Administration Construction Costs {5% of estimated construction costs) TOTAL $10,000.00 $11,750.00 $170,000.00 88,250.00 $200,000.00 DISTRIBUTION OF FSTIMATFD COSTS Total Amount of Estimated Costs Total Number of Contributing Properties Total Amount Due per Contributing Property $200,000.00 10 $20,000.00 RANCHO · 172/~7-R9 Parcel Moo No. ~3,3~0~ 173768-73 Porce/ Mop No. 26g~a,') MB. 87359 S.D. Tem~culo LandS~Valer .PM 135/8S Parcel Mop No. 19677 ' RM. 139189-~0 " " " 21381 APR. 19~ ~/Zll ~~ II ITEM NO. 7 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL ~ CITY ATFORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER ' CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council Ronald E. Bradley, City Manager April 5, 1994 Employee Assistance Program (EAP) RECOMM EN DATION: That the City Council authorize staff to solicit a Request for Proposal (RFP) from qualified firms experienced in Employee Assistance Programs (EAP). BACKGROUND: An Employee Assistance Program (EAP) can provide a confidential, counseling resource outside the work place that can assist employees and their families with personal problems before those problems create performance issues. The City can benefit from contracting with a EAP consultant to: Increase job performance and reduce absenteeism. Reduce turnover and retain valuable employees. Improve management effectiveness and employer/employee relations. Lower health insurance costs and improve safety. Provide a resource for the City if a disaster or tragedy occurs. Staff is requesting authority to send out a RFP to 11 local firms that currently provide this service to local businesses. In addition to the counseling service, staff is looking to these firms to provide training to management and employees on such issues as substance abuse, stress, depression and other job related issues. The cost for an EAP service varies depending on the provider. Rates vary from a flat fee of approximately $1,500.00 per year for all services, to an hourly charge. If the Council approves sending out the RFP then a selection committee will evaluate all of the proposals, conduct interviews, and enter into negotiations with the top ranked firm. FISCAL IMPACT: There are adequate funds available in the Human Resources Budget to fund this program through the end of the 1993-94 Fiscal Year. Funding for the .1994-95 fiscal year will be approved by the City Council with the adoption of the upcoming budget. ITEM NO. 8 APPROVAL TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Harwood T. Edvalson, Assistant City Manager~ April 5, 1994 Council Opposition to AB 3167 and H.R. 3636 RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council 'authorize the Mayor to sign the attached letters in opposition to Assembly Bill 3167 (Epple) and House of Representatives Bill 3636 (Markey/Fields). BACKGROUND: At the Council meeting of March 22, 1994, Council directed staff to prepare letters of opposition to an assembly bill (AB 3167) that would preempt the City's adopted anti-graffiti ordinance, and to a house of representatives bill (H.R. 3636) that would eliminate the city's ability to franchise companies wishing to provide cable TV services in Temecula. The justifications for taking opposition to these two pieces of legislation are included in the attached letters. The letter opposing AB 3167 would be addressed to Assembly members Haines, Epple, Boland, Bates, Gotch, Isenberg, Lee, Rainey, and Umberg, the Assembly's Public Safety Committee. The letter opposing H.R. 3636 would be addressed to House Representatives Packard, Calvert and McCandless. FISCAL ANALYSIS: In its current form, AB 3167 would have a negative fiscal impact on the City by allowing greater potential for shoplifting of graffiti implements. This would undoubtedly increase the incidence of and cost for removal of vandalism in the City. H.R. 3636 would preempt any new franchise fees from any future telephone company-owned cable service. It would create an uneven playing field between the existing cable operator, which pays approximately $139,000 in annual franchise fees. City of Temecula RonsZd H. Roberrs Assemblyman, 66th District Ma~or 29377 Rancho California Road, Suite 102 J~rsy E. Stono Temecula, CA 92591 Mayor Pro Tern Temecula, California 92590 Pstricis H. Birdsall Councilmember Dear Assemblyman Haynes: April 5, 1994 Re: AB 3167 REQUEST FOR A "NO" VOTE J. Sal Mufioz Councilmember Ronald J. Parks Councilmember (909) 694..6444 FAX (909) 694-1999 On behalf of the City Council of the City of Temecula, I am writing to voice opposition to the proposed preemption of local anti-graffiti regulations. In its current form, this legislation would remove the ability of the City to regulate the sale and display of graffiti implements including aerosol paints. We have two major concerns with this legislation: (1) This bill makes grnffiti implements more accessible to minors. Tamecula's current ordinance requires aerosol paints and marking pens to be swred in an area not accessible to the public in the regular course of business without employee assistance. This discourages shoplifting of these items to be used for graffiti vandalism. AB 3167 only requires the posting of signs indicating sales to minors to be illegal, leaving graffiti implements open to shoplifting. (2) AB 3167 would take away the City's ability to deal with graffiti in a manner appropriate to our individual community, Although all cities in Southwest Riverside County, including the County, have adopted anti-graffiti ordinances, they have been tailored to address the needs of the individual communities. As conditions change, and new forms of vandalism become prevalent, Temecula wishes to retain the ability w address its problems quickly and in a manner that best suits our citizens needs.' Temecula adopted an anti-graffiti ordinance March 23, 1993, more than one year before the State Assembly has even set a date for this bill to be heard in the Public Safety Committee. We urge your opposition to AB 3167. Please don't allow a special interest lobby to successfully preempt local government legislative authority, and relax local anti-graffiti enforcement standards. Please vote no on AB 3167. Sincerely yours, Ronald H. Robarts Mayor Jeffrey E. Stone Mayor Pro Tern Patrlcla H. Birdsall Councilmember J. Sal MuBoz Councilmember Ronald J. Parks Councilmember (909) 694-6444 FAX (909) 694-1999 Dear Congressman Packard: March 28, 1994 Re: H.R. 3636 REQUEST FOR A "NO" VOTE On behalf of the City Council of the City of Temecula, I am writing to register our opposition to H.R.3636 which would eliminate the franchising authorities of municipal governments in the area of telephone company provided Cable TV. It is our understanding that this bill will reach the House floor soon. Our concerns with the bill are threefold: (1) Loss of franchise authority weakens local control over quality and monopolistic pricing of local Cable TV. Recent rules adopted by the FCC provide for monitoring of service levels and basic pricing by local government. Franchise agreements also include language related to service and pricing. Removing the franchise authority of the City of Temecula will weaken the leverage that the City has to require fair and adequate Cable TV service by the telephone company in an area that is not geographically open to receipt of free over-the-air TV signals. (2) Loss of franchise revenue would create a hardship. The City of Temecula uses annual franchise fees to support public services in its general fund extending even to police and fire protection services. These franchise fees also help bear the cost of cable rate monitoring recently allowed through the Federal Communications Commission. (3) Dis-enfranchisement would result in the loss of local public services. Through its cable franchise negotiations, the City of Temecula was successful in obtaining government access programming, allowing for the viewing of City Council meetings on Cable TV. A $75,000 monetary grant was also obtained to provide equipment to expand government access to provide additional public educational/service messages and programming. Loss of this authority would leave local government without the abfiity to obtain similar public services from the telephone company. We urge you to oppose H.R. 3636. Sincerely yours, Ronald H. Robeits Mayor ITEM NO. 9 ORDINANCE NO. 94-10 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ~ AMENDING CHAPTER 2.08 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE RF~UIRING THAT THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ~LFCTIONS OF THE CITY OF TEMECUIA BE m~,Ln ON THE FIRST TUESDAY AFTER THE FIRST MONDAY OF NOVEMBER IN EACH ODD- THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES ORDAIN AS FO~ I OWS: Sectiop 1 - Findings: The City Council of the City of Temecula finds as follows: A. Pursuant to the .terms of Government Code Section 36503.5, cities are authorized to change the date of general municipal elections to coincide with the elections dates of the statewide direct primary, the statewide general election or the date of school district elections; B. The City Council finds that its goals of encouraging maximum voter turn-out and minimizing costs will be promoted by changing the general municipal election date of the City from the first Tuesday, after the first Monday of November in each even-numbered year to the tirst Tuesday, after the first Monday of November in each odd-numbered year. C. If approved by the Riverside County Board of Supervisors, this change will not have the effect of extending any term of office by more than twelve months. ' Section 2 - Change in General Municipal Election Date: Section 2.08.010 of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended to to read as follows: "2.08.010 When held Commencing with the genenl municipal elections to occur during 1997, general municipal elections of the City of Temecuh shah be held on the first Tuesday after the first Monday of November in each odd-numbered year.' Section 3 - Extension of Terms of Office: Section 2.08.020 of the Temecula Municipal Code is herby amended to read as follows: "2.08.020 Extension of terms A. Those councilmembers of the City of Temecuh whose terms of office would have, prior to the adoption of this Ordinance, expired following the November,, 1996, general election shall, instead, continue in office until no later than the fourth Tuesday after the date of the November, 1997, general municipal election of the City of Temecula." R~mis~62 I B. Those councilmembers of the City of Temecula whose terms of office would have, prior to the adoption of this Ordinance, expired following the November, 1998 general election shall, instead, continue in office until no later than the fourth Tuesday after the date of the November, 1999, general municipal election of the City of Temecula. Section 4 - F/feetive flute:. This Ordinance shall become operative 30 days from the date of its adoption and upon approved by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Riverside. Section S - The City Clerk k hereby directed to: A. Certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause the same to be published as required by hw; B. Transmit a copy of this Ordinance to the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Riverside, together with the request that said Board approve this Ordinance and provide the City with notice of such appwval; and C. Within thirty (30) days after approval of this Ordinance by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Riverside, cause a notice to be mailed to all registered voters in the City of Temecula informing them of the change in the general municipal election date and councilmembers terms affected by this Ordinance, which notice shall be in accord with the requirements specified in California Government Code Section 36503.5(e). PASSI~r}, APPROVED AND ADOPT!~, this 5th day of April, 1994. ATTEST: Ron Roberts, Mayor June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEA1,] a~onb~62 2 STATE OF CAt-t~ORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMECULA I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 94-10 was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regluar meeting of the City Council on the 22nd day of March, 1994, and.that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 5th day of April, 1994 by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: CO~C~ERS: CO~CII3vIEMBI~,S: CO~CIIIIEMBERS: June S. Greek, City Clerk R~mb~62 3 ITEM NO. 10 ORDINANCE NO. 94-11 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMFj2UI~ AME~ING CHAFFER 2.04 OF THE TEME~ MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO THE TIME AND PLACE-OF CITY COUNCIL THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEIVlLc'ULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Chapter 2.04 of the Temecula Municipal Cede is hereby amended to read as follows: '2.04.020 - Time and place of meetings. A. Regular meetings for the City Council shall be held on the second and fourth Tuesday of each month. Regular meetings shall commence at 7:00 p.m. and adjourn at 10:00 p.m., subject to an adopted motion to extend the meeting. Regular meetings shall be conducted at the Community Recreation Center (CRC), 30875 Rancho Vista Road. B. The City Council may, be resolution, designate another date, time and location for a meeting." Section 2. l~.ffectlve r~. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. The City Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance and a certified copy of the full text of this Ordinance shall be posted in the office of the City Clerk at least five days prior to the adoption of this Ordinance. Within 15 days from adoption of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance, together with the names of the Councilmembers voting for and against the Ordinance, and post the same in the office of the City Clerk. PASSED, APPROVED AND .ADOPTED this 5th day of April, 1994. Ron Roberts, Mayor A'lq'EST: June S. Greek, City Clerk tmlsX94-11 (SEAL) STATE OF CP-T-wORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) SS. CITY OF Ti2VIECULA ) I, JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 94--11 was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 22nd day of March, 1994, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the ~th day of April, 1994 by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COIINC~H~ERS: COUNTERS: COUNCH_A{EM~ERS: June S. Greek, City Clerk ords~,94-11 2 2.04.010 Chapter 2.04 CITY COUNCIL Sections: 2.04.010 2.04.020 2.04.030 2.04.040 2.04.0S0 2.04.060 2.04.070 Election of members. Tim and place of meetings. Impreper conduct at meetings. Adoption of procedure. Compensation. Commission appointments. Presiding officer. 2.04.010 Election of members. The electors of the city shall elect council mem- bers at ~e gene~ municiV~ election held every two years on the date of the statewide general elec- tion. (Ord. 90-02 § I (2.04.010)) 2.04.020 Time and place of meetings. A. Regular meetings for the city council shall he held on the second and fourth Tuesdays 'of each month. Regular mcefinSs shall commence at'seven p.m. and adjourn at ten p.m., subjea to an adopml motion to extend the meeting. RegUlar meefinSs shall he conducted at the Temecula Commmljty Center, 28816 PujOl Street If a regular meetins falls on a holiday, the regular meeting shall he held on the next bumess day. B. The city council may, by resolution, designate another date, time and location for a meeting. (OnL 90-02 § 1 (2.04.020)) 2.04.030 Impleper conduct at meetings. A. All person shall comply with the meeting procedures announced by resolulion of the city council and no person shall interfere with or inter- rupt a city council meeting. B. The presiding officer may desi~e a mere- her of the county sheriff' s department as se~geont at arms who shall carry out the directions of the pre- siding officer to include making arrests as directed by the presiding officer. Any person who fails to comply with a direction given by the presiding officer may he removed. C. Any person using profane, vulgar, loud or boisterous language at any meeting or otherwise interrupting the proceedings, who refuses to be seat- ed or keep quiet when ordered to do so by the may- or or other presiding officer of the council, is guilty. of a misdemeanor. (Ord. 90-02 § 1 (2.04.030)) 2.04.040 Adoption of procedures,. The city council may, by resolution, adopt roles. of procedure and regulations pertaining therew to govern' the conduct of its meetings and any of its other fimgtions and activities. (Ord. 904E § 1 (2.04.040)) 2.04.0S0 Compensation. A. Each council member shall be entitled to a salary in the mount of three hundred dollars per month. B. Upon the submission of an itemized account, any council member may be-reimbursed for the marice of official duty. (Ord. 90-02 § 1 (2.04.050)) 2.04.060 Commission appointments. Unless otherwise specifically provided in this code or by sta~ law, all city board and commission appoinUnents, except for ex officio members where applicable, shall be made by the city council (Ord. 904)2 § I (2.04.060)) 2'04,070 'Presiding officer. A. City council shall meet on the Tuesday after the general municipal election and choose one of its members as mayor and one of its members as mayor pro tempore. B. The mayor, and the mayor pro tempore, shall serve a term of one year, or until a successor for each position is chosen. Thee affirmative votes shall be required to choose or change the mayor or mayor pro tempore. C. In addition to the powers and duties of a council member, the mayor, or in the mayor's ab- sence, the mayor pro tempore, shall be the presiding officer of the city council. (Ord. 90~02 § l (2.04.070)) 15 ITEM NO. I 1 CITY ]~N~GER ~ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: RECOMMENDATION: 1994. DISCUSSION: City Manager/City Council Mary Jane McLarney, Finance Officer April 5, 1994 Proposed Resolution re: Establishing a Nonrefundable Fee for Charitable, Religious and Commercial Solicitation That the City Council continue the public hearing until April 26, The proposed resolution is still under review by the staff. FISCAL IMPACT: None. · ITEM NO. 12 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY ATTOR~YPROVAL-~~ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager / Gary Thornhill, Director of Plan~~ April 5, 1994 Ordinance Amending the Land Use Code Regarding the Term of Plot Plans, Conditional Use Permits, and Public Use Permits Prepared By: Debbie Ubnoske RECOMMENDATION: 1. Read by title only and introduce an Ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE' NO. 94_ 'AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE LAND USE CODE REGARDING THE TERM OF PLOT PLANS, CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS, AND PUBLIC USE PERMITS.' 2. Adopt a Resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94__ 'RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE LAND USE CODE REGARDING THE TERM OF PLOT PLANS, CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS, AND PUBLIC USE PERMITS.' BACKGROUND The Council requested staff to compile a list' of applications that would be affected from this change, which resulted in this item being continued from February 22, 1994, March 8, 1994 and April 8, 1994. Attachment 1, Applications Potentially Affected by Ordinance (Chart) - page 2 2. Continued City Council Report dated February 22, 1994 - page 3 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 APPLICATIONS ~Y AFFECTED BY ORDINANCE Mm:B-/ORANDUM FROM: DAT~ 1994 the ,,aaHo,,o~ time e,'~-~ Opm,w,~,, ('m pm'imlzr, Sm~-~ 4 xe, biin$ u~ the ~ ol' Should you have amy qm~.~_'on% or if I can be of any *..~...-,~e,, please feel fuse ID coutac$ either me or my rotf .at ym= mmuvimi,,,,k,,e,, AllachmmU: 1. Five Year ]:-xten,dOnm - page 2 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 FIVE YEAR za'~'sra,~ONS 11001 /IVE YEAR 11234 6/19/9~) Dr, dfoM 20Eu:e ~dlai,~gs - 11339 5/06/91 Coop Auto Exp. 5106/93 Sen, ira Cmt~ 91,216 hi. fL. 11376 6/05190 ~ Ho~ 2 mat 7,992 sq. 11604 9/18/90 Coast ~ ~ 1162 1 8F28/90 Koll Coraltony FnamH · 116,368 sq. ~ 11759 11/92 t~mmino 17,5.~2 sq. fL. n, dl,Hn, 11654 11/30/90 ~ 108,671 sq. ~ 2.5'3 ac~e, 11767 1/01/91 Mn~a 6baymUmrv~ Ynn-Rmd. ((1) b, dHin=~ built) Tower Plan Wtst ~ of l~xmt ~ av~c,,-~mstely 2300 fen (gZ/-I10.(DT) ~-~,-rc era'net of Rmmim Way and Businert Park (921-020.061) North of W'mc~.n~ Road, w~st of Ynn Road. (910-200-074) 28853 ~ Street (r~-luo~u3) Atmm=~ 1,~0 hi. ATTACHMENT NO. 2 CONTINUED CITY COUNCIL REPORT DATED FEBRUARY 2.2, 1994 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL C .I'FORNEY RNANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER February. 22., 1994 Ordinance Amending the Land U~ Code Regarding the Term of Plot Plans, Prelamd B~ Debbie Ubrmske RECOMMENDATION: 1. ORmNANCE N0. "AN ORDINANCE 'OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMEIE)IN6 THE LAND USE CODE REGARDIN0 THE TERM OF PLOT R.AN~, CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS, AND PUBUC USE FERM~I.' Adolet s Resdulton entlllm]: RESOLUTION NO. 94-__ 'RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE LAND USE CODE REGARDING THE TBIM OF PLOT PLANS, CONDITIONAL USE PEtMITE, AND PUBUC USE BACKGROUND At the April 5. 1993 Planning Commission meeting, staff recommended the Cc.,.,,iasion amend Ordinance 348 to Mlow for two additionBI one year extensions of .tim for Plot PIBns. Conditional Use Permits, end Public Use Permits. At this meeting, the Commission exlxas sad a concem relative to extc, ,:ling the life of permits they had never seen end re{luested staff rosearch the number of Council 8pproved projects which had not .expired end bring it beck to the Commission. STaff reseBrched City 8pprovels for the period from April 1990 TO June 1990 which we the period of time the City Council acted sotely To ep. prove or deny projects. During this period. the City Council ected on eight County transferred plot plens 8nd no conditional use permits or public use permits. Of the eight plot plans acted on. ell have 'either been consUuctad or have expired. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission ,,Jsl~ng, the inning Commission direclad staff to prepare an Ordinance providing for two additional yearn to allow applicants additional time to construct their projects. Commissioner Hoegland was opposed to such an Ordinance. He felt giving mpplicxnta ·n additional two years was not in the City's best interest. At the December 6, 1993 Plarmb~ Commission meeting, the Ordirmnce was presented end · pproved by the Commission three to one with Commissioner Hoegland in opposition. .Pursuant to prior Council direction, Section 4 of the litached Ordinance allows permittees to · quest ·instat·meat of exlimd City 8pproved' applications. within six months of the date the Council ·dopta this Ordinance. The rm~,ilAt~.,Jnt hearing will be conducted by the Planning Director. For examlle, if the City had 8pproved · cono'itim~ tee Fennit on the date of incorporation, December 1, 1989, the pamdt would have exlired on November 30, 1991. Under Section 4 of this Ordinance, the Plmming n:re :t~r oould grant the permittee up to three one-year extensions of tim. The effect of this would be to extend the permit to November 30, 1994. If the conditional use pannit.had been rapproved on .December 1, 1990 end had expired on November 30, 1992, the running Director could now gram two additional extensions in the following mrs to extend it up to November 30, 1995, Staff will comct ell 8ppilcanta who will be able to avail themselves of these additional time extensions. FISCAL IMPACT Adoption of this Ordinance could result in · positive focal impact in that it will provide businesses additional time in which to obtain funding and begin construction of their projects. Attachments: Resolution No. 94- - Page 3 Ordinance No. 94- - Page 6 Planning Commission Staff Report - Page 11 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 RESOLUTION NO. RESOIJY/X)N NO. 94- iI.E~IJ]'I~N OF 'lIKE CrrY COUNCIL OF Tmr- CITY OF 'rmM~'~ IECO~ING ADOFI*KON OF AN Olfi]~!ANCI ~ 'INE La.v~ ~ CODE' KEGA~J~ING THE TEIM OF PLOT FLANS, wn,:-ar. As, City No. 90-04 ponioa ofdm non.. codre,-4 Rivehide Comny O, dh~-,V;~l, h~Ju~M' OXdh,~-e NO. ~ ('IJnd Use Code*); mad wH,:,~As. such feg-aod,.,.,. provide for e-~*sm,, of dane fur plot plans. ccmdido,,oa use permits, and lmblic use ~.its; and W- m*.-~.An, the 0ty of Temecmk wishes to provide for an -4mdoe-a period of time to aJlow for the developmeat of r.~o,~ad ad'oje. As; mud w~, a public !,e,,,inf was cors4~ m D~cmb~' 6, 1993, 3muary 7..5, 1994 and Febna~ 22, 1994 at which time iniz~..Zd lmms had m c~,amity to testify either in W-.,xr-L.q, aXim of Ibe t,,., .~axe d Oz,~,,-,,ce. wupomed sX City l:bn; County Library, Rancho ~ ]~anch, b U.S. Post Office and-the Temec',,1,~ Valley Ch-mber of Commerce; and NOW, Tm~gsrORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF TIlE CrrY OF IlMECULA DOES RE~LVE, D~ AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the City Co-,,m'~ of the City of Te,~d- hett~ finds that theze are no Cottory ca~ l~nlniu_e fluat W0qid~ be able IO IIVI~ tl~--]~ Of ~ m,4di~(mml e~'f~,nd~ll Of Secdon2. 11at the City Co,-,,~'~ of the City (d* Temnec, d- hereby finds that the lh~bTl..osed Ox'din~nCe providing for two City of Section 3. Tlmt t!~ City Coo,w41 of the City of Tewr, d, berdxy finds that this Ordinance is ererapt through Sectio~ 21080 of the California Bn'~.o~..-A~! Q.ality Act. of the proFse~l o-Mi~o.,--~ e,xte,,~;o~ of time (:):~,,-,-,ce. The O-~,,,-,ct is inc~t,o,.-,ttd into this m.,a"r ' - Sn&'N.d. 4 RONALD ROke,-KxS MAYOR I Hs,'~t':*'Y CER13FY that the ft,.y.~oin$ lmesnh**ima was duly adoptal by the City CmmciloftbeCityofTemepn-atazeZular ..4:,~.~ thereof, !r. ld oa the 22nd day of F, ebmary, 1994 by the ~ vote artbe AYHS: NOES: ABSENT: ATTACHMENT NO. 2 ORDINANCE NO. ~.__ AN ORDINANCE OF 'HIE CHT COUNCIL OF ~ CITY,. OF 'I~fB(:XTXA AMDO)ING 'tHE 'LAND 'USE CODE U~'-AUnmTG Tim ~ OF CONDITIONAL USE TsTR CITY COUNCIL Olr Tire CElT OF I]RN[BCULA DOES I:FFns~Ry ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: · "'ee"~_ L Article XV]IX, Section 18.30(0 of Rivedde Comt_ty Ordi,,.-,~e No. 348, as adopted by zt.f~unc¢ Ismsuant to City Ofu~e,.e No. 9004, and as om,~ded pursuant to City Chdi,,-..z No. 91-09, b hereby -..-,~V./i ID trod as follows: "f. AFPROVEDPHRXOD. Tmat~o~alofapiotplanslmllbevalidfora Pl°tmiQr Dbeclor may il,~ovc, .cc=.'r. eic--:..,tly at.s-"o~c off deny the Itpplirtion. An atcnsion of time may be tr~n'~tl by b p!~mlnf ~ only upon a d:k4(,:...i.u.t;Cm tlmt the ps'xe~.rt'y and use are COn~i~t wida die ("~me, e-I FJaa., Land Use Ch,41~-;--e,, and all' other City Ch~.,=~cs and x=g-~-dom, If an Them "use" shall memt tbe bc, e;..,,'d.¢ of s that is -.;.-~ri-ed. wbich ct-.,pk~.',% ar b actual oc~,t-,~y of e~.s~ L..-'mh~ ef bnd antler tenas of the~use. b~daw~ofaltlxphn~bod~ .... to Secdoe 18.26 of this · "'ec"_,~ 2. Article XVIII, St-so,, 18.280) of O~di.~..,,cc No. 348, as adopted by zeference pursuant So City 0Zdln,.,~ NO. 90-04, is haeby omeSd~ tO zmd as follows: zSdl appiiratlem for lit tallfflSjlMl Of ~ dia]l be Iliade tO the pbmnin.a Dh~ctor,. laqennhV Diam nay at,zxo'vc, coe~ny ~zaovc or deny the aplpHc-don. An 'ertm~im of time 'may be ~ by tlz phmsln_m Dizecn' only upon a :ZAild UI2 C)X(!i,i"~ihC¢, 131d 911 Olh~ ~ Oldigegeel lad feedrations. ff aD ex/aHionbF'anted, the mtal time allowed for use of the aMmxoval shall not approval The term marine" ~ memn tile k_A;.h-.int (air · subslandml ~ of the mime that is -,~.imrlmed, m4iich amlixucdml must Ih~tafh. J be Imxsued dii~grmfiy tO the onebodmed ume. 'Xlae eltective date of a CO, n,HdOmq ~ permit shall be "ection 3. Article XVUT; Sec,i~ 18.29(e) of C)~n99oe No. ~48, as adopted by refaencc punamnt.to City (kdln,mce No. 90-04, is hereby ,,merv:tat to read as follows: 'e. APPROVI~rsPHR[OD. The ~ of a public use pexmit shall be valid for a period of two years from its effective date wilhin which time the ~ authorized must be subssmntln!!y Ix~tm or the OCCb~,anCy -,~'hoxl,ed NOtwithteh-..'tint the fOx~oin2, the p2,'mitlK my, lador to the ea~ of the public me pamit, spply for up to thass (~), ooe (1) year extendo~s of tires in An mpplication for an' ea~,don of time daall be anade to the ps-nnln£ IXzec~, ma farms provided by the pao,ml,xf Depamnent and shall be filed with the pi-nnha.a Dt.pruCh,AfiL, 8cco,,l~s.~;t~l by tim mt,p, oia;slc filing fee. Within thix~ m:wrAnmmx. Ax~_ ~ ~ e, 8 Section 18.26 of x~n.~'J pursuant m ti~ pnxz, d~,. set forth above. In ordm' to A:6,-~ any such permit, tb~ permittee must mala~ an at~li~ Iv A.i,.-,~u. within 180 days of ti~ effective da~ of this Ordinnnm. Fectk-, S. ~ev~-b~y. If any lmmvisiom of this Opf,-,,,-e or tb~ thefeof to any period or citcm,,e*,,,'e is held invalid, such inva!Mity shall not affect other severable. publish a ~Ummsry Of thl= O/dl.d.,-,C II~ a C.~ai~'zr~i COpy Of flip ~ 23I Of fil~ ~~ zhall :, ~~. W~n 15 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a 3unc S. GTeek, City. Clark [SEAI,] STATB OF CAI. II~!INIA ) COUNT~ OF iU'v'ItR.~DB ) CmT~O~~ ) tt nmdingatangularmmi~oftlmCityCountimtthe__dayof ,1994, and that of the City of Trmrc, d- m tl~ __ day of,1994, by the follow~ wll call vote: AYEq: NOBS: ABSENT: · 1-'~ z ross, e. 10 A'rTACHMENT N0. 3 PLANNIN8 COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MBdORAI~UM TO: FROM: DATE: December 6, 1993 SUBJECT: Prepared by:. Dabble Ubnod2 RECOMMENDATION: ~ Adoe, d:i. dg ;"wld. eiOn 93- Moptim of an Ordinmmm maltlad: BACKGROUND At tim April 5, 1993 !alarming Canmission Maat~. staff mco.,.,~m,,dkl that the Commiuion amend Ordinance 340 to allow for two adJitie.~l one year mxtm'miorm of time. Same concerns were mad by the Commimion mt l~e ,,jatjng releive To e.,.m,~iing the life. of I~rojec',s tm Commission had never Hen. Staff researched City approvals for the period from April 1990 to June 1990 which was the period of time The City Counmq acted soleW to aimrow or deny projects. During this period. t~e City Council acted on eight County b-.,~l.e.,.ed ;dot Fins. No conditional use or'lmblic use permizs were acted on. Of the eight Idat llsa acted on, all haw either been constnacmd or ave expired. AT the concltmion of the Planning C~.,,,.i~ion Me.q. the ~ ~,,;;q] Cc,...,,Luion dimc'tm:l staff to prepare an Ordinance providing for two add;lSm' -I yearn to allow almlicanm additional time to c~ their mcm. C~,.,,i~i~rjr Hagland m c,~n.g d to m~ch an 0rclh~,~_w. He felt giving applicants an additional two years was not in the City's best i. 4crbts. DISCUSSION it is stmff's opinion that the five year 8~pro, I ~rcc t is would benefit Ixjai..e raw by providing them additional Time in which to obtain hating and begin cormreaction. It is further .staff'; onimon Zl'mt them are no cases mmairing from the County which would be able to ztmmseives of this additional tifne. Section 4 of 'the attached Ordinance tallows pen'nit'tees to mOLleft reins'tat],,,],A Of exph"ed City apl~:wecl applications within six .,,,,.Ahs of ttw dam thin Goutrag adolgs this 'Ordil w,__m. The reip. s'm'mmertt hearing will be conducted by the ~ Director. For exmngsb, if tl'm City had approved a conditional use perillit on the date of incorporation, Decmnbm' 1, 1989. the permit would have expired on November :30, 1991. Under Section 4 .ofthis Ordinance, the Planning Director could gram the peffnittee up to three one-year extensions .of time. The effect of this would be to extand the permit to November 3C), 1994. If the conditional use permit hid been approved on Decenber 1, 1990 and had expired on November 30, 1992, the Planning Director could now grant otto m~mmion mt 1t~ time To mcmnd ~he mtnniT to Novaminer 30, 1~g3, and than gram two mddidorml Imlmjm~ in thm following-.years to extend it up to Novumkmr 30, 10~. :. Adoption of This Ordinance is exBmpt JJ,rc~h SBcdoff 21080 ofthe California Environmeal Quality Act. ATtachments Resolution No. 9~,._.- Dim'Page Ordinance No. 9~,..,.,- Blue Page I~w-~OLUTION OF I:BE ~~ COMMISSION OF IEE CHT OF .rn'M~~ nT'r'rXuMEqDING ,rn'r. CHT LAND 13SX (lIDS)r;.c.-*srnlNG Twr- ~ERM OF FLOT ?LAN~, ~muNA~ ~ ~ AX~ FI:!SLIC USX .wx,:-~.,.~, the Cit7 orTe,-t~k wishes m lsmide fern *,;,.de,,*z peziod of time w :aZlow for the dew~,.~.~t of appmved l,,,,jc.,-~ and wr, ,:~r-,tS, · public bexdn2 was co,-4-"*"~ ass I:1~, ..,b · 6, .I~Y~, ax which inufft. sr~l persons had an ~ ..... :,y m areairy either in **xpfert or ut,r,~;~;,~,~ and wx,.:-~&S, nod~aftlm~,,...ns/O, Ac.--.-,e was lxmed at City l:hm. Conmy. Lt'brdsT, ~anr. ho r-.fcrmia mrs-,.% the U.S. ~ Otfuz assEl the Tew-.e-k Valley Clamber of NOW, TFr~OKE, ~ FIAlqNING COMM~ON OF Twu crff OF TEMXCULA DOES ~zx~-qOLVE, D~ AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the Plannhx2 re~'~'~ ef We C, ky of Tern,w-x- bffeby finds that there ~ no Co~ ~ ,~...-;..;.,g ~ w~ ~ ~ m ~ ~~ d ~ cxx~io~ d Section Z. Trot the 1~-,,,~ Commlqion of the City of Temec',.~- ~ fn~ the the proposed Or,~-,we pzova,.,,Z for two ,ddlti,.w,-~ one year e~m.,,~,w,s of time will beme~ bu~.,esx~ ~ the Cky of Tc.,..'~b Section3. That the Pla,,,,i,~ r'c, ......;,.so- ofdse Ctty ofTemee-b haey fmds thaz tWs Orcii,,,,nce is exempt tlmm2ts Secxian 21080 of the r'-"fm'nia Tm~;.,.- .......,.! Qutlit7 AEL Section 4. Tamz dze~ Co ...... to the Ciz7 CoEzil -d,&.-+o- of the F,,.,~,r,d ,,,r,:^..-: ~., ...:,,, o~ time ~.--..cc. The Ord~n:-ce is inco. l.,u.~.j:! into thle p,.sosm'irm by dais .~z.,..,,c8 and .... .~,, d r-tM'hiX "A' Ind dzted Dec..~ber 6, 1993, for AYSS: NOF:S: yr..A.NND~ :FL4MNING COD,rmm~*~ONm~_~: :F~tMM:Z:NG C~*~Olq~.S: GAEY ~0~ _t O~.D3NANCE NO AN ORDINANCE OF TEE crlT CO13NC!L OF Tn?- (:lIT OF 'fTMT~ LMI:NDING ~ LAIqD 13SE CODE REGiRDING ~ ~ OF CONnmnHAI, 13I: Tm;: ~ COIINClL OF ~ (:lIT OF TEIVITf~T-e, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: to C. ix'y O.,.,4:..:..."c No. 91-.~, b beeby .: .....,,:k4 m ned ss Jo]ksws: in~~ only. P~-,.-,~g Dbccmr nmy. ,,x.,p,,-c, ¢-.-~:,.,--~y -x.,.r,,.,,c or deny tie · An exw,,slcm of time my be ~ by the x ~, ....:.-,_ Dh'ecmr on~ upon a Land Use Ch.i;.--..,-e, sad all odzr City Ol,~.-,..~-, and xt.f-~ If an cr~d a paiod of five.(5) yesn, c-i,-,k,,-4hom xbe effeaive dale of tie in which to nm the pimpin. ~ ,--" -.-;"^ oftin~ ,.~n b~ F--zd in one (1) i,-,,,,b~ n~,-.,, ....4, -,.c,--~-,,'-4 by the ,,,,p,~,;axc frn~_ fee. W',,h~ mbty (30) days loWowing. the fn;,,_, d an ,t4>nc .,c.,_, for an ,-',,~ of time. the 'An, ,,~ ..-:,,-. d dine nmy be :,._.,,~ by the F- .....:-. Z;:.,,,A,, only upon a The tern "use' sbxll rams= the t~s: .... ;.~, of a s,,bo.-.d;.~ ~,,h.cdon oftbe use thaz is -,~hf.+,~ which ramminion nms: fJ~Af~ be ~ .,,~ho~,.d u.m. Th~ ~ dam of a c~...,~t:o..ud dezrmined punant xo Sm 18.26 of this Section 3. Anick XVIIL Sec,lo- 18.29(e) of OxfH~e No. 348, as adopted by refcmnc~ pursuam to Cizy G,.l~,,-..ce No. 90-04, is ha'elF/-mended to mad as follows: "c. APPSOViDPZBXOD. TlzqVmuldalmnblicnsepmd:sbxtlbevalid for a period of two years fTmn its etiective daxe wh,,i wtch time the casmsc~m .,~,~ nsua be F,bf-miany beim or the oc.,Ap-...cy --,hcm+~ R:titiTA~ 11,~1~3 IB 8 o o. ,,'i,,T, ....;..amim)., thE: the ~,,,p,,,m,.,.v aid rise lie co..-;-.,- ^~ wil:h tile ,,~,-.-;~, b ~ tie mmal time aDoseed for m~'of :t~ ~ :tFoqS- " v""'-"' m Scm:mion 18,26 ofthi 0,~.'*--- provisions or at~X"sd"a% sad .m Ibis end, the pmvisiam ef tlsis (h~.--.,ce m ~ to be 9 juries-. Gzeek, STATS 01: C0~ ) COTmTY al: ~n ) crn, oF~ ) mid C~ .....ce was duty *,taFwu and lnssed at azemslar,,,ee*~ aftbe Cit'y COUNr'Tr NOrmS: COUNr'Tr ~lc'm.~:. COT,.I'Nrq"r 10 ITEM NO. 13 APPROVAL CITY ATFORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER · TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning April 5, 1994 An Ordinance to reduce water consumption through efficient landscape design, consistent with provisions of AB 325. PREPARED BY: John Meyer, Senior Planner RECOMMENDATION: Open Public Hearing and continue to April 26, 1994 City Council Meeting. BACKGROUND Staff is requesting this item to be continued to allow staff and the City Attorney an opportunity clarify a few issues. This item was noticed as a public hearing therefore it must be opened to public testimony. R:~STAFFRI~.CC 3/30/94 Idb 1 ITEM NO. lzl- TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPRO~ CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning April 5, 1994 Procedures and Recommendations for Notice of Public Hearing Prepared By: Matthew Fagan, Assistant Planner RECOMMENDATION: Provide Direction to Staff regarding the Implementation of Notice of Public Hearing Procedures BACKGROUND Planning Staff was directed by the City Council to review present Notice of Public Hearing (NOPH) procedures. Staff conducted this review of the following issue areas: in-house generation of adjacent homeowner notification labels, a revised NOPH flyer, a criteria for a standard exhibit for the vicinity map contained on the NOPH flyer, a new sign for posting the site, and additional exposure in the newspaper, posting the site upon application submittal and minimum number of residents to be notified. Staff presented an assessment of the' current procedures for handling NOPH, as well as suggestions for improving the process to the Planning Commission on March 21, 1994 (Planning Commission minutes are not available as of the date of this report). The Planning Commission concurred with Staff recommendations for the following items: in- house generation of adjacent homeowner notification labels, a revised NOPH flyer, a criteria for a standard exhibit for the vicinity map contained on the NOPH flyer, a new sign for posting the site, and additional exposure in the newspaper. Examples of new signs for posting the site have been included as Attachment No. 2. Two designs are for posting the NOPH (one has a map with the location of City Hall on it). Another design contains the hearing body and the date of the hearing. An exhibit has been prepared for a Notice of Application Submittal. The Planning Commission was split in terms of posting the site upon application submittal. They voiced concerns about potential length of time that signs could remain posted on the site (i.e., some Specific Plans could be posted up to several years), the effectiveness of the posting at application submittal time and potential maintenance costs for the signs. The Commission recommended that Staff devise specific criteria for determining the minimum number of residents to be notified. Although the Commission felt that it was important to inform adjacent residents of pending hearings, they felt that to notify residents based on a specific number of residents was arbitrary. R:\STAFFRPT\NOPH-2.CC 3/2~/9~ kLb 1 FISCAL IMPACT Fiscal impacts listed below are based upon thirty-one (31) Planning Commission and twenty (20) City Council items that needed to be posted in 1993. Potential impacts from implementing the above referenced procedures are as follows: Cost for posting site for Notice of Application Submittal: ~50.00 per posting (Add approximately ~ 12.00 per sign for specific use) Total: ~3162.00 Cost for fabricating/replacing Notice of Application Submittal signs: ~ 150.00 per sign. Assumption is that twenty (20) signs will be needed. Total: ~3000.00. Cost for posting site for Notice of Public Hearing: $50.00 per posting (Add approximately $15.00 per sign for specific use and specific hearing date). Total: ~3315.00. Cost for fabricating/replacing Notice of Public Hearing signs: $150.00 per sign. Assumption is that twenty (20) signs will be needed. Total: $3000.00. Total approximate cost for new signs/posting for application submittal/Notice of Public Hearing: $12,477.00. Approximate cost for Staff to generate notification labels in-house: ~125.00 (to be passed on to the applicant). Attachments: Planning Commission Staff Report March 21, 1994- Page 3 Noticing Sign Exhibits - Page 4 R:\STAFFRPT\NOPH-2.CC 31~1~4 k|b 2 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MARCH 21, 1994 R: \STAF FRPT \NOPH - Z. CC 3/Z9/96 k t b 3 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Planning Commission Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning March 21,1994 Planning Department Procedures for Noticing ReCommendations for Improving the Noticing Process Public Hearings and Prepared By: Matthew Fagan, Assistant Planner Linda Beaudoin, Planning Technician RECOMMENDATION: REVIEW the attached Staff Report on Current Notice of Public Hearing Procedures RECOMMEND a Notice of Public Hearing Procedure to the City Council BACKGROUND Planning Staff has been directed by the City Council to review present Notice of Public Hearing (NOPH) procedures. Staff has conducted this review and will present an assessment of the current procedures for handling NOPH as well as suggestions for improving this process. DISCUSSION Current NOPH Procedure The current procedure fir NOPH ,is as follows: Notification Labels: Staff receives the notification labels as part of the application submittal. The guidelines for preparing the notification labels are included with the application and are attached as Attachment No. 1. These labels are typically prepared for the applicant by a Title Company and a certification letter must accompany the labels (Reference Attachment No. 2). Projects that will be heard by the Planning Director require property owners within a 300 foot radius from the project be notified. Those projects that will go before the Planning Commission and/or the City Council require property owners within a 600 foot radius from the project be notified. The labels are verified by staff to be accurate and that they reflect the correct area to be notified. Notices are mailed to the property owners within the proper radius from the site. This notice is also attached to the sign that is posted on the site. R:\STAFFRPT\NOPH,PC 3/15/W, ktb 1 Notification of Homeowner's Associations Within the Project Area: Staff has recently started notifying Homeowners Associations (HOA) that may be affected by the project at the Development Review Committee (DRC) level. Staff determines which HOA's are affected by the project by reviewing the City's HOA map and assessing those HOA's that abut the project or take access from the same road as the project. A letter is then mailed to the Association along with a copy of the proposed project. A City Staff contact person is named in the letter. Posting of the Site: The site is posted with a 4' high by 4' wide bright yellow sign prior to the date of the hearing body. Depending upon noticing requirements imposed by state law, the sign will be placed upon the site 10, 20, or 30 days prior to the hearing. Additional Notification: In addition to the above methods of noticing property owners and HOA's that may be affected by development proposals, the project is also noticed at the following places: a. In front of City Hall; b. At the Temecula Library; c. At the Temecula Town Association; and d. In The Californian Newspaper. Recommended Chanqes to the Current NOPH Procedure Alternative Sources of Notification Labels: Staff has looked into acquiring the notification labels from a source other than Title Companies. Two alternative sources of notification labels are discussed below. A third option would be to encourage the Title Companies to include a standard exhibit in their package that would afford Staff the opportunity to spot check the validity of the labels. In-House Generation of Labels. Staff has the capability of generating the notification labels in-house. The process would involve the time of the Information Systems Administrator, the Case Planner, and an Office Assistant. Materials would include the Assessor's Pages, labels and a form to fill out to give to the Information Systems Administrator. Estimated current cost for this process would be approximately 9200.00 per application. Currently, it is also estimated that Staff will have the time to generate the labels. The benefit from using this process is that it would place the responsibility for this function on the Planning Staff to assure that the notification labels are correct and complete. Outside Contractual Service. Staff was contacted by an individual who will 'also provide the service of generating the notification labels. They have stated that they have started to provide this service for Title Companies. They currently charge 91 .00 per label with a minimum charge of 975.00 per project. The benefit from this service is that there is a specific individual that will be held responsible for the accuracy of the labels. The shortcoming of this system is that the cost could be expensive for applicants. R:\STAFFRPT\NOPH.PC 311519~ ktb 2 Standard exhibit for radius package. One other option is to create new criteria for the Title Companies to follow that will assure that the correct information is supplied to Staff. One way to accomplish this would be to require them to provide an exhibit (the Assessor's Index Page) in the submittal that would show the parcel in question along with all of the parcels-within the specific radius range. An example of this is included as Attachment No. 3. In addition to showing the radius and each parcel, they would also have to (identify on the exhibit) all of the Assessor's pages. Staff feels that this option would resolve the problems that we have been experiencing in the past. Revised NOPH Ryer. Staff has created a revised NOPH notice that is mailed to the affected property owners (Reference Attachment No. 4 for current notice and Attachment No. 5 for the revised notice). The new features are listed below. New layout. The new notice contains a much larger font for the words "Notice of Public Hearing." In addition, the words Notice of Public Hearing will be located next to the return address on the outside of the notice. The vicinity map is located in a box in the center of the notice. Bright color. Staff recommends that the notice be printed on bright paper that will over time automatically trigger a response in people's minds that this is an important item that has been sent to them from the City of Temecula. Ce Standard Criteria for Exhibit for Vicinity map. Staff has prepared standard criteria for the Vicinity map for the.notice (see Attachment No. 6). The vicinity map will clearly call out the main streets in the area. In addition, the site will be shaded, with the word "site" in large print and an arrow showing the location of the site. New Sign. A new design for the sign that used for posting the site ha~ been explored as another way of increasing the visibility for projects. Staff recommends that the sign continue to be the same size as previous used (4' high x 4' wide) and the same bright yellow color. The top of the sign should include in bold letters what is being proposed. This information should be in plain language and brief in its description (i.e., PROPOSED CHURCH or PROPOSED SHOPPING CENTER). This information should be visible to motorists while in their cars. Below this would be the words "Notice of Public Hearing." Also needed on the sign should be the City Seal, notice information, the City's address and phone number and a directional map to City Hall. Staff is requesting direction as to the type of sign that the Commission would prefer to see posted on the site. Typical costs and prototype signs for new signs have obtained from a sign company and are included as Attachment No. 7.. A ~45.00 charge is currently levied by the sign company that is under contract with the City to post sites. Posting of Site Upon Application Submittal. In addition to posting the site for a Notice of Public Hearing, the site may also be posted upon submittal of an application. The anticipated- benefit from posting the site early in the process is that the adjacent property owners will be afforded additional notification and time to respond to the project before it goes to public hearing. A shortcoming of this is that the posting of R:\STAFFRPT\NOPH.PC 3/15/96 ktb 3 the site for application submittal will be more costly that posting the site for the Public Hearing. Additional Exposure in the Newspaper. The Californian was contacted to determine how and whether additional coverage may be provided for the Public Hearing items within the City of Temecula. Staff inquired into the possibility of including hearing information in the front page index. The spokesperson for the Californian is still in the process of determining if this is possible. A synopsis of the meeting agendas can be placed in the Government Meeting Section of The Californian if specific newspaper deadlines are met (Reference Attachment No. 8). Minimum Number of Residents to be Noticed. In some instances, the number of affected property owners within a 300 foot or 600 foot radius from a given project is a very small number (i.e., between 5-10 separate property owners). Some municipalities have a minimum number of property owners (approximately 30) to be notified. This will assure that a satisfactory number of affected property owners will be notified of projects in their area. Attachments: · 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Required Property Owners Notification Information - Blue Page 5 Property Owners Certification - Blue Page 6 Standard Exhibit for Radius Package - Blue Page 7 Current Notice of Public Hearing - Blue Page 8 Revised Notice of Public Hearing - Blue Page 9 Standard Vicinity Map for Notice of Public Hearing - Blue Page 10 Costs for Types of Noticing Signs and Prototype Signs- Blue Page 11 Example of Government Meeting Section of The Californian - Blue Page 12 R:\STAFFRPT\NOPH.PC 3/15/94 ktb 4 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 REQUIRED PROPERTY OWNERS NOTIFICATION INFORMATION R:\STAFFRPT\NOPH.PC 3/15/9~, ktb 5 REQuI~k'n PROPERTY OWNERS NOTIFICATION.INFORMATION The following items will be required at the rime of fBing of the above noted case application: TWO identical packages to be inserted in scparaxe 9 1/2" x 12 1/2" w~-ih envelopes. These envelopes shah indicate the case number and the word "labels," and shall contn{n the following: be One typed set of gnmmed labels indicating all the property owners' names sad the raniliaE ~es that are within a 600-foot rodins of the enezior of the proposed project (this list shall be ascerr:~ined from the last eq~mliTed assessment roll). For Projects under 10,000 square feet in size AND requiring a planning ~or's Heazing, a 300-foot radius package is needed A photocopy of the aforementioned labels. One label for the representative and/or engineer. One hbel for the owner. Four typed sets of gummed labels of the owner, engineer, and representative with their rn~iling addresses. Do not include duplicate sets where rrpresentative and owner, etc., arc the same. These should be inserted in a letter-sized envelope and stapled to the outside of one of the large manila envelopes mentioned in item 1 above. Certification by the title company, engineer, or surveyor that the above list is complete and accurate. The Tax Assessor' s Office will not prepare or certify the property owner list (see certification form attached). On a copy of your exhibit or tentative map show all parcels within 600/300 feet. On the map, print the names of all property owncr~ within 600/300 feet as they are listed on the ' CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING DEPARTMENT ATTACHMENT NO. 2 PROPERTY OWNERS CERTIFICATION R:\STAFFRPT\NOPH.PC 3/15/9~ ktb 6 PRO~T~Z O~VN]~ CI~'t'~xCATION I, ,cexlifytt~ton ,theattached (Print Hams) (mouth-day-year) propew/ownerslistwasl by (Prin~ company or individual's name) pursuant to application xequizemcnts fisrni,~hed by the City of Temecula Planning Deparuncnt. Said list is a complete and true compilation of owner of the' subject property and all other property owners within 6)0500 feet of the property involved in the application and is 'based upon the ]ale~ ej:l,-~li'yx,.d a.~Se,~Sme-nt milS. I further certify that the information filed is tree and corr~ to the best of my knowledge. I understand that incorrect or erroneous information may be grounds for rejection or denial of the application. NAME: TITr ,~GISTRATION: ADDRESS: PHONE: SIGNATURE: DATE: -CASE NO.: (Sa.m. -Sp.m.) CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING DEPARTMENT ATTACHMENT NO. 3 STANDARD EXHIBIT FOR RADIUS PACKAGE R:\STAFFRPT\NOPH.PC 3/15/9z, ktb 7 ,/ .® ATTACHMENT NO. 4 CURRENT NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING R:\STAFFRPT\NOPH.PC 3/15/~ ktb 8 Notice of Public Heariv4, ~ CITY OF TEMECULA 43174 Business Park Drive Temeeula, CA 92590 A PUBLIC I~!~ARING has been scheduled before the PLANNING COMMISSION to consider the matter(s) described below. Case No: Applicant: Location: Proposal: Environmental Action: Planner: Case No: Applicant: Location: Proposal: Environmental Action: Planner: Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commi-q$ion before the hearing(s) or may appear and be heard in support of or opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised a~ the public hearing(s) described in this notice, or in wri~en correspondence delivered to the p]nnnlng Commission at, or prior to, the public hearing(s). The proposed project application(s) may be viewed at the public information counter, Temecula Planning Deparunent, 43 174 Business Park Drive, Monday through Friday from 9:00 AM until 4:00 PM. Questions concerning the project(s) may be addressed W the case planner at the City dTemeoula p|nnning Deparmlent, (909) 694- 6400. The time, place and date of the hearing(s) are as follows: PLACE OF !~ARING: DATE OF HEARING: ~ OF Ft~ARING: Vail Elementary School 29915 Mira Loma Drive Temecula, CA 6:00 p.m. ATTACHMENT NO. 5 REVISED NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING R:\STAFFRPT\NOPH.PC 3/15/9~ 9 Public Hearing A PUBLIC mt. AR~NG has been scheduled before COMMF, SION to eomider the matter described below: ~ No: Applicant: Location: theCITYOF'I~I~r, CHLA HANNING F.,llvironmentai Action: Planner:. Recommendation: vacin Map SEE ATTACHMENT NO. 6 PLACE OF HKAR1NG: DATE OF WI~.ARING: lIME OF nvARING: Vail Elmsamy ff--~e at, 2991.5 lVfira Lama Drive, Tememh, CA · Z1994 6.-00PM Any person may submit writran comments to ths l~.,.i._~ Commission before tlaz hesxing(s) or may sppesr sad be heed in support of or opposition to the spprovsl of the project(s) at the time of hesring. ~you dsamge ssy o/the proyazs ~s court, you ssy ke //m/2d to ra/~g on/y thou/uua you or soreezra dze ra/sed at tht pub//c hmrin~s) ~/n :h/: ~ or/n mqazrz correspo~ ~d_~vered to ths. ~ Commission at, or prior to, the publ~ Imrinl(s). The p,~pos~t project application(s) may be viewed at the public information countzr, T mmcula PLtnning D,p,,ta,at 43 174 Businmm Park Drive, Monday though l:tiday fr"" 9:00 AM until 4:00 PM. Questions concmming the project(s) may be addrinsed to at the City of Temecula E ~mS Deparunent, (909) 694-6400. CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING DEPARTMENT 43174 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE TEME~, CA 9259O NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ATTACHMENT NO. 6 STANDARD VICINITY MAP FOR NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING R:\STAFFRPT\NOPH.PC 3/15/9z, ktb 10 ~.PROJECT AREA SHADED BOLD WORD '- 'SITE "AND ARROW VISTA RD it m %. RD MAJOR ' fSTREE'rS ' IDENTIFIED I I NORTH ARROW ATTACHMENT NO. 7 COSTS FOR TYPES OF NOTICING SIGNS AND PROTOTYPE SIGNS R:\STAFFRPT\NOPH.PC 3/15/9~ kib 11 SIGN SINGLE ANNUAL TYPE CASE COST COST SEM/- $150.00 Material & construction 100 Signs $15,000.00 PERMANENT 50.00 planning Commission posting 100 Signs 5,000.00 SIGN :50.00 City Council posting (ff necessary) 30 Signs approx. 1.500.00 $21,500.00 PER 10 Signs # $1,500.00 MEETING $ 50.00 Planning Commission posting 100 Signs 5,000.00 POSTING 50.00 City Council posting (if necessary) 30 Signs approx. 1,500.00 PER 10 Signs # $1,500.00 MEETING $ 50.00 Planning Commission posting 100 Signs 5,000.00 POSTING 12.00 @ Large lettering for meeting date 1,200.00 (Meeting Date 50.00 City Council posting (ff necessary) 30 Signs approx. 1,500.00 Posted in 12.00 @ Large lettering for meeting date 1.200.00 large letters) $10,400.00 Assumes replacement rate of ten signs/year (may be less) R:~PLANNINll%SIONS.Cl!T 3111/94 sdl SEMI-PERMANENT SIGN PROPOSED USE: 200.600 Weeam. Mater. Zone Ckll!~l: bide lI~ll INI. II Commercial PublicHEaring Notice CITY OF TEffiECULA For inlermetion contact: Temecule Plannlng Department 4:$174 Business Park Drive Temecele, CA 92591 (gOg) 694-6400 a. Sign goes up at time of application. b. Planning Commission Meeting notice posted. c. City Council Meeting notice posted (if required). d. Sign removed after final action. SIGN COST Single Case Cost $150.00 Material &construction 100 Signs 50.00 Planning Commission posting 100 Signs 50.00 City Council posting (if necessary)30 Signs (approx.) $250.00 Advantages: - Constant public information dudng review process. Disadvantages: - Vandalism and maintenance. - Higher costs to applicants. - Sign clutter around city. - Posting of headng notices would largely go unnoticed. Annual Cost $15,000.00 5,000.00 1.500.00 $21,500.00 . PER MEETING POSTING PROIqIEP USE: 2~O,llO wfwemm. e4mter. / PublicHeaPing Notice CITY OF TEriECULA For infermarion contact: TameCOle Planlog DePartment 43 174 Business Pert Drive Ternscale, CA 92591 (90g) 694-6400 ae Sign goes up pdor to Planning Commission meeting, Planning Commission hearing notice posted. Sign removed after Planning Commission meeting. Sign goes up pdor to City Council meeting, City Council -headng notice posted (if necessary). d. Sign removed after final action. SIGN COST Single Case Cost* 10 Signs# 50.00 Planning Commission posting 100 Signs 50.00 City Council posting (if necessary)30 Signs (approx.) $100.00 Annual Cost $1,500.00 5,000.00 1.500.00 $8,000.00 *re-usable signs #Assumes replacement rate of ten signs/year (may be less). Advantages: - "Up" time is reduced, minimizing potential for vandalism and sign clutter. - Signs am recycled, reducing costs to applicants. - Placement of sign structure catches attention easier than posting of notice on existing sign.. Disadvantages: - Shorter overall window of time for public noticing. PER MEETING POSTING PI~BPOS[D USE: 2Oa.OO0 of eoem. mr. Zm. Cheul8: Ileddeulld-dl. to Coetamrdel Public Hearing Notjce 'O CITY OF TEHECULA CitU Council rieeting~ Feb. 8. 1994 For Informallea contact: TimeCUll Plealag Department 43174 Business Perk Drive Tern,cola.. Ca 92591 694-6400 Sign goes up pdor to Planning Commission meeting, Planning Commission hearing notice posted. b. Sign removed after Planning Commission meeting. Sign goes up pdor to City Council meeting, City Council hearing notice posted (if necessary). d. Sign removed after final action. SIGN COST Single Case Cost* Annual Cost 10 Signs# $1,500.00 50.00 Planning Commission posting 100 Signs 5,000.00 12.00@ Large lettering for meeting date 1,200.00 50.00 City Council posting (if necessary)30 Signs (approx.) 1,500.00 19.00@ Large lettering for meeting date 1 .~00.00 $124.00 $10,400.00 *re-uSable signs #Assumes replacement rate @ option of ten signs/year (may be less). Advantages: - "Up' time is reduced, minimizing potential for vandalism and sign clutter. - Signs am recycled, reducing costs to applicants. - Placement of sign structure catches attention easier than posting of notice on existing sign. Disadvantages: - Shorter overall window of time for public noticing. ATTACHMENT NO. 8 EXAMPLE OF GOVERNMENT MEETING SECTION OF THE CALIFORNIAN R:\STAFFRPT\NOPH.PC 3/15/9A ktb 12 dents at Unfield School during a visit Tues- day. The students were tzested to an explana- of business services, said the Upper made his cornmen: iton of fire ~2htfn2 techniques as weal as sofet~tlPsabeutwhattododndnga~xe. iders animal rescue policy ns and other animal shel- In an emergency, a Ranch- so that the rightful' owners ~uesday, ccunt~ adininis- : officer Harry l:'nipps re- I that veteran Animal ~1 CkiefEmmett Gibson ~ r-aj~combined with con- citizens to save all ani- ossible durin~ the recent es. ~ private property need- ~ntered, it was,' said ._ 'A notice was left for _~er stating that their an- :-,d b~en removed, trod '.hey could be picked on said rescue efforts · hindered by the lack of ch Permit' process -- a ~ to be considered by the Task Force for Domestic Breeding. Permit procured beforehand could be posted on a Kate or fence, authorizing animal con- trol staff to enter the propertF as needed to rescue Phipps, however, questioned the count~s liabili · ' 'ty for ani- mals that may perialx despite proper postin~,and Gibson maintained tha~ any Hisaster rescue plan should be flexible enough to allow his crew to deal Gibson did support aman~,ng the ccunty's .~;m~] shelter con- tram to provide for emergency situations, but at some addi- tional cost. Supervisors cited their des·r-' es to have shelters hold rescued animals for longor time periods the California Parks idiife Bond ACt of 1994 oes to voters in Junt' pomtod a task force to cat population conl~ol ng a cat licensing pro- Re 1st Dis~ric~ will be ntod byMichelle Sheehe D.istrict by Anne Wash- ~roved the sixth chan~e the Minion Trail road =~ project in Lake Elsin- ne board approved ~or I'~BC CourTactors !, rebury and pack , ¢er existing sewer der iVllssion Trail £ol- subsidence pro. blems. Change orders for the projecf now total $178~180 or 8.23 per- cent of the m'i~nn! pro~ect cost. [] Approved a memorandum of understanding between the Mood Control District and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers re- ~--'ding emergency response to potential lake flooding at Lake IReappointedJosephPhelps of Temecula to the Distric~ 7 Mood Control and Water Con- servation Comm~-sion. Phelps has served on the for three years and will now serve to Oct. 31, 1996. , ComOilecl by Chuck Harvey could have a better chance to els~im them. Also, the board a~reed that animals should be transported and held as near as possible to their points of res- In the Winchester and Ortega area fires, most county-rescued animals were taken either to the Lake Elsinore Animal Friends Shelter, 29001 Bastron St., or P,~nona Animal Haven at 690 Hn,--ne Way in San J:- cinto. Dozens more were saved by the ex~nsive rescue efforts of volunteer residents -- such as Debra Johnson of Winches- ter, who used her own horse porary boarding for several horses left homeless by fire.. [] GOVERNMENTMEETING l WildomarMunic|pal Advisory Council WILDOMAR--Thetown Munic/- pal Adviso,/Council will meet al: ? p.m. today in the Wlldomar Be- mentary School, 21575 Palomar St. The agenda includes: [] County Supervisor Bob Buat- er's mport on a possible re2{onai park in Wildomar. I Posting of Wildomar bound- arysigns. [] Establish liaison with county Planning Commission. mm Rood cordyoi planning com- mittee. Im Discuss m-up of NeiF~bor- hood Watch program. i Joint Powers Commission for March Air Fome Base. based on what appears a double-edged sword: the $32.2 mflI~on increase is predicated on MSJC increasing it~ per- class unit fee fi~nn 213 to $20 end takin~ back about 215 raft- lion by defundin~ students with bachelors depress. Mur~eta st for morn MURR~TA __ For the sec- ond time in two months, resi- dents are going to bat for a Murrieta woman suEering a debilitafiug blood This time they actually w~!~ swing softhell I ts 'for l Erjori; Winn, whose baffle with aplas- tic anemia made headlines in December and ushered in a flood of community support.. 'Everyone was so helpful, it was just unbelievable,' said Deb.bie McCabe, who helped or- p-,e the December fund-rais. ing 2mpaig osity, the effort netted holiday toys and clothing for th family as well as $2,300 for a family trust fund at First paclf. [c Bank on W'mchester Road, rution Com,-~qion last week approved a two-day soitball tournament torthe Wi-,, cause. The coed, doublHlh-~--tion event is set for Feb. 5 and 6 st California Oaks Sports Park Area businesses already have donated items for a game-rela~ ed silent auction. Money made from concession sales also will benefit the Winns, McCabe Organizers hope for 18 ? ATTACHMENT NO. 2 NOTICING SIGN EXHIBITS R:\STAFFRPT\NOPH-2.CC 3/29/9~ kLb 4 Sign for Posting Notice of Public Hearing Proposed Use: SHOPPING CENTER Public Hearing Notice NOPH Flyer CITY OF TEMECULA For information contact: Temecula Planning Department 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 (909) 694-6400 ITEM NO. 15 APPROV/~v. CITY ATTORNEY ~_ FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Manager/City Council Mary Jane McLarney, Finance Officer April 5, 1994 Community Services Funding Request Recommendations RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council 1 ) review and approve or revise the attached recommendations in response to the applications received from community based organizations, and 2) only consider requests from community based organizations once each year in connection with this process. DISCUSSION: At the meeting of March 22, 1994 Council appointed a Community Services Ad Hoc Committee, Councilmembers Stone and Birdsall, to review requests for funding from community service groups. Attached are the recommendations of the Ad Hoc Committee, which amount to ~50,000from the City Council's social services funding, as well as $10,000 in recommendations for the City's promotional budget. The ad hoc committee has also strongly recommended that the City Council only consider requests from community based organizations once each year in connection with this process. FISCAL IMPACT: The unencumbered balance in the City Council discretionary account is approximately $50,000. Sufficient funds exist in the RDA promotional budget to fund the attached recommendations. Attachments: Community Service Funding Program Detail ITEM 16 FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER . TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer March 5, 1993 Private Bus Benches in Public Right-of-Way RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council provide direction to Staff regarding the placing of benches in the public right-of-way. BACKGROUND: At the regular Public Traffic/Safety Commission meeting of January 28, 1993, the Commission agreed by consensus to support a Sunrise Rotary Club project to place forty (40) bus benches at existing bus stops on Ynez, Jefferson/Front, and Rancho California Road. The Rotary Club would sell advertising on the benches and use the profits to increase the funding of their local school scholarships and community projects. Subsequently, the Public Works Department issued an encroachment permit and the Rotary Club installed the benches. However, several benches were placed at locations that already had existing RTA benches and the difficulty in relocating them to new locations cause the following issues to surface for Council consideration· Establishment of guidelines and procedures for placing benches in the public right-of-way by organizations other than the Riverside Transit Agency (RTA). 2. The quantity of benches and their location. 3. Guidelines for permitting one organization over another to place such benches. 4. Coordination with RTA. 5. Relocation of duplicate benches at certain locations. Assumption of liability by the organization receiving permission to place such benches and time limits on monopoly by organization given the authority to place benches in the public right-of-way. -1- r:~egdq~94~O40S~aueben~h 032894ekg If the Council chooses, the Staff can prepare a formal policy addressing the above items and submit it for review at a subsequent meeting. FISCAL IMPACT: Approximately forty (40) hours of personnel time will be devoted to this project. Attachments: 1. Sunrise Rotary Report 2. Traffic Commission Minutes 1/28193 3. Traffic Commission Letter -2- r:%agdfpt~4~O4OS~;uebeneh 032894ekg Bus Bench PPo.]ect YJ4~~ - ~4-~ F'roJect: To build and place approximately 40 bus benches at RTD bus stops on the three major arteries in Temecula: ¥nez, Jefferson/Front. & Rancho California Rd. Fhese bus benches wi}l have advertising on them? sold by members of the club to businesses in the community, as a tax deductible donation to our foundation, with Drnceeds from the project returned to our community. The benches are rotated on a reguiar basis so that advertisers are exposed to a variety of locations in the community. [his Dro.]ect Hill +it into two of Rotary's avenues of service: 1) Vocational Service? as it will.reouzre the assistance of severa) vocations represented in our club, such as: a) Attorney-to draw up contracts for advertisers to sign. ~) Sales- to organize a sales program to sell the advertising, c) Engineering- to design the benches and arrange for their manufacture, d) Aavertlszng- to design advertising format for uniform design to comOly with City Sign Ordance/variance and arrange for painting of the signs, e} Insurance- to protect advertisers and the Rotary dub against liability claims. 2) Community Service: alto determine the most beneficial locations to place the benches to serve-the advertiser and the public, b) to run the ongoing committee to move the benches (rotate) on a auarter!'y/monthlv basis. Both o+ these Avenues of Service will benefit from the project as St is proposed that: l) one-half of the profits from this project be used to increase our funding of scholarships to local high school. continuation high school. and community college Qraduates and 2) one-half of the profits from the project be used to fund our communltv Dro~ects, ze: ~otary Park, Communitv ~ecreatlon Center. Senior Center. youth sOprim Dragrams, etc. in6 committee should consist o+ members with the +oilowing responsibility: Uhalrman ~ro.~ect toordinator Permit F acllitator with City. ~/~'~' ueslgn ~ Manufacture · ! ~-- (~,'~,'.' ~lgn Criteria, Design & Painting Legal anO Insurance Icontract w/advertisers) rz., .......... ,- . .... Sales- FroJeer fac~litator (moving benches) issues for Consideration: Bench Design: K]'D - fiberglass seat and back on concrete legs-frame Homer Rotary Club Benches: Plywood seat & back on tube steel +rime-legs ~ommercial - 2"x'o".seats. plywood back in aluminum frame on concrete tegs-+ra~. On the ~Tb and Commercial style bench, the back ~s removed and moved to the next location ¢the advert~z~ng rotates~ wheras on the Hemet kotarv Club bench, the entire bench is moved. Design considerations are time ~t takesto remove and ~nsta11 bench backs with added security of -eight o+ bench vs ease ~n moving entire bench <by thieves as well>. Location & Number of BenchesT R'fD has an established bus route in Temecula using several streets, but our ourposes we need locations that will 'serve the greatest nunbet of peddle and have benefit to advertisers. Therefore it is recommended that onlv ~nez? Rancho California Rd. and Jefterson-~ront streets be used. Limiting benches to these streets will also make moving of the benches easier on a regular basis. City AoDrovai Process: Sign Ordinance standard sign design: color, name, logo, address, phone. Permit krocess City Staff, Planning. Commission, City Counci] Pricing Considerations: fast of building bench Cost of Sign Painting S~andard fee per Year ~lus initial design & ~aintxng Value to advertiser ~a~ Deductable donation Contract: Fixed Location (e~tra cost vs rotating bench?) ~otatlng Bench Price Liability Insurance {club to provide) ~lgn criteria Use o~ profit limited to scholarships and community Dro~ects Financial Impact: , ' There will be a considerable cost assocsated with imolementing.this Dro~ect, Drlmarilv in the purchase of. the benches from a manufacturer or materials ourchased for the club to manufacture them as a club project. Additionally, the cost o+ daintyrig the advertisers s~gn onto the bench. ~ecause of the number of benches and artgoing business for a sign company, we may be able to negotiate a favorable rate. additionally, all or part of the initial sign painting may be charge~L,l to the advertiser when they timst advertise. It Is recommended that all maintalnce of the benches and of the advertising be the resDonsibiizty o~ the Rotary Club. This Nili encourage advertisers to continue to advertise ~or multidie years. Fhere may be uDfront costs for design and sign review bv the City. Once the lnitia| expense of purchasing the benches and going throuah the permit process with the City and getting the benches painted, the program should ?enerate a signi~icant 'proKit' with which to ~und our scholarships and community service projects as 40 benches at $300. each per year = $12.000. gross. There ~s very little maintaince expense to these benchef once they are ~nstalled. Occasiona|IY they may be vandalized with gra~iti, or abused-broken which will require constant insQection and repair. ~Jhen the benches are moved, they can be cleaned by the moving committee, or a company can be contracted to clean them on a regular bas~s. ~epend~ng on the selection of bench desig~ the benches may be stolen, which requires replacement so that the advertiser receives value for h~s donat~on-~nvestment. Note: Rectangular can- opies are nvailable for most park benches. (See /x~ge ! 5 for details.) FIBERGLASS PARK BENCHES Our Park Benches feature fiberglass backs and seats with 1/4 "square steel cores on 1~4'; 14 gauge galvanized steel flat feet with ground secorement capabilities. Backs and benches are standard 12" widOxs, however 10" and 15" wide surfaces are also available on some models. Please inquire with factory. 12' length park benches have a 3rd center leg for all 6/pes. $Ts~-t_ LEG - Our traditional $tet4 Ze~ park benches provide ~.~,~.~.~IP~' cities and parks with the same solid durability and maintenance free beauty found in our~bergtnss and .'---m,r.=.,, - provide generous room for the weary user. · .~ ,~,, ..... 6P8 72 I0 $0 $ W 8PB 96 12 65 S W 12PB 144 12 100 S · DOUBLE PEDESTAL Our traditional Double Pedestal park bench offers a clean look and a comfortable seat to the tired park visitor. Its pedestal legs make area clean-up around the bench a snap. 12' length benches have a 3rd c, T pedestal leg./.c'gs are either in-ground n. ,ring type or have leg plates for secorement to concrete. (Sec p-qgc 26 for details.) STONE LEG Popular with city and park buyen due to its anti- /anthi strength and durability our traditional ~tone ~eg pzrk bench with its 4" cast molded, steel rein- brced concrete legs provide a unit that needs no Lnchoring... where you place this brute, is where it ;rays. Modd tt.ngth Sat W'dtA Weilht Rnisb (in.) (in,) (in Ibs,) 6PIC 72 I0 245 S W 7PI5C 84 12 2S0 S 8PBC 96 12 ~ S w I.,~ 12 380 RECEIVEDI TEMECULA. CA 92390 January 19, 1993 Larry Markham 41750 Winchester Road, Ste N Temecula, CA 92590 RE: Rotary Bus Bench Project Dear Larry: Pursuant to our conversation, enclosed is a list of proposed bench locations. This list does not include all of the bus stops in Temecula provided by RTA, on it~s Route 23, but represents those most suitable for advertizing. We have asked RTA for permission to relocate it~s ~existing benches on Route 23 to'those locations not provided by our project. I have'asked Tom Paradis to contact RTA for a letter expressing their position in favor of us taking on the responsibility of providing benches for the convenience of their customers. Tom will forward their correspondence to me within the next week or so. Please call me if you have any questions. Sincerely, Steven D. Ahlquist First Vice President Manager 27280 JEFFERSON AVE.. SUITE 100 · TEMECULA. CA 92590-5609 · TELEPHONE (714) 694-8566 · FAX (714) 694-1362 PoI.; Downlown Temec.io, TemKulo Pork'n'Rkie Totgel, , Toww PIoa, Old Town, Herboge Mob;~e Home Pork New Yeats Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. __ Wdlm Iq~'rmho Ylata HIgh Iohool Tl Mktdk~ Llnfleld 8;hool CII/Isllln HIDh tJohool o/ Page 68 RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY , September 1992 Printed on 100% Recycled Paper Through Street Rancho Calif Rd Ynez Margarita Front Front Front Front Front Jefferson Rancho Vista Rancho Vista Rancho Vista Rancho Vista Margarita Margarita Margarita Margarita Margarita Margarita 26040 Ynez Front Street Front Street Front Street County Center Drive Ynez Winchester Winchester Diaz Diaz Front 2nd Street Main Front Rancho Calif Rancho Calif Rancho Calif Ynez Ynez Ynez Ynez Ynez Ynez Ynez Rancho Calif Rancho Calif TEMECULA SUNRISE ROTARY- BUS BENCH PROJECT PROPOSED BENCH LOCATIONS Cross Street Town Center Rancho Highlands Rancho Vista Rancho Calif Del Rio Del Rio Via Montezuma Via Montezuma Winchester Sports Park Sports Park Mira Loma Mira Loma Ave Barca Ave Barca Stone Wind Stone Wind Solana Solana Equity Drive Enterprise Cir S Ave Alvarado Dos Picos Rancho Calif Front Front Towne Center Car Wash Margarita Rancho Highlands Solana Mervyn's Koll Center Palm Plaza Mervyn's Entrance Toyota Margarita Moraga Plaza Description S Side/East Bound E Side at Duck Pond NE Corner At Chevron Station At McDonald's Restaurant SW Corner NE Corner SW Corner At Burger King South Side North Side North Side South Side NW Corner SW Corner NE Corner SW Corner At Apartments SW Corner At Bianchi At Old Adobe De1 Taco At Walt Abraham Center At Jefferson Med Center NE Corner SW Corner SW Corner SW Corner At Post Office N Side N Side Wherehouse West Side NE Corner East Side SW Corner S Side S 'Side PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION Chairman Guerriero declared · recess at 8:00 P.M. JANUARY 28.1993 The meeting reconvened at 8:10 P.M. Bus Bench Project Director Serlet presented the staff report. Larry Markham~ represe.nting the Sunrise Rotary Club, reported on the bus bench project being proposed, to build and place approximately 40 bus benches at RTD bus stops on the three major arteries in Temecule. The club proposes to sell advertising on the bus benches, which will be installed and maintained by the club members, and proceeds from advertising-sales will be returned to the community. Chairman Guerriero suggested that a shelter type bus bench be located at the senior center. The overall consensus of the Commission was in support of the Sunrise Rotary Club bus bench project. Western Bvoass Corridor Alianment Study Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer, presented the staff report, Fred Weishaupl, representing NBS Lowry, 27450 Ynez Road, Temecula, the consulting firm hired to prepare the Western Bypass Corridor Alignment Study, presented an overview and discussed the alignment studies and diagrams of modified secondary highway section alternatives. It was moved by Commissioner Perry, seconded by Commissioner Sander to approve staff recommendation, recommending to the City Council the following Western Bypass Corridor Alignment Study recommendations: 1) Approve the Western Bypass Corridor alignment, as illustrated in Exhibit 7 of the Western Bypass Corridor Alignment Study report, dated December 1992 (Revised), as the Master Plan for this route and maintain its present classification of a four-lane divided arterial highway on the City of Temecula General Plan Circulation Element. 2) Approve the intersection design concept illustrated in Exhibit 3 of the report as the Master Plan for the Front Street' Intersection. 3) Approve the design concept of a grade separated interchange for the Rancho California Road intersection, as illustrated on Exhibit'4 of the report. PTSCOMMIN1128/13 -3- . '. 2/6/~3 PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION JANUARY 28. 1993 4) Direct Staff to utilize this study document with the above described master- planned routeAntersections as a resource document for response to development proposals in the west Temecula area and for future planning of the City's General Plan Circulation Element, including: 5) . · Recommend mat. bike paths not be included in the design concept. The motion carried as follows: AYES: 6 COMMISSIONERS: Holliday, Johnson, Knopp, Perry, Sander, Guerriero NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None OTHER BUSINESS 7. Traffic Enoineer's Report Director Serlet reported the following: * Advised of a Local Official's Transportation Forum and asked if any Commissioner wanted to attend. Chairman Guerriero stated that he would like to attend, * Director Serlet asked that the Commission choose a member to serve on the Temecula/Murrieta Traffic Committee, It was moved by Commissioner Johnson, seconded by Commissioner Knopp to nominate Chairman Guerriero to serve on the Temecula/Murrieta' Traffic Committee. The motion was unanimously carried. * Director Seriet asked for the Commission to collectively agree on a date to tour the speed undulations in other cities. The Commission tentatively agreed on February 23, 1993. · The contract will be awarded for the widening of Ynez, Anticipate construction to start in March and continue for approximately nine (9) months, · Director Serlet provided an overview of the storm damage and clean-up activities. ~ PTSCOMMIN1128/93 -4., City of Temecula 43174 Business Pa~ Driv~ · Temecula. C~lilornia 92590 February 8, 1993 FEB I 0., MARKHAM & ASSOCIATES TEMECULA, CA 92390 69,1d989 · FAX 1909l i Mr. Larry Markham Markham. and Associates 41750 Winchester Road Temecula, CA 92590 Sunrise Rotary Club Bus Bench Project Dear Mr. Markham: Please advise the Sunrise Rotary Club members that the City of Temecula Public/Traffic Safety Commission supports their involvement in the Community and is pleased to endorse the proposed bus bench project. Please extend to the club our appreciation for theinterest the Sunrise Rotary Club has taken in this project. The City of Temecula Public/Traffic Safety Commission is certain that this project will be both successful for the Rotary Club and beneficial to the City of Temecula. Sincerely, Chairman Ron Guerriero City of Temecula . Public/Traffic Safety Commission 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA -92590 RG:gz CC: Director of Public Works Tim Setlet City Council ITEM 17' APPROV3kT, CItY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Council/City Manager Tim D. Sedet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer April 5, 1994 Status Report on Winchester Interchange, Overland Bridge, Winchester/Nicolas Signalization, Right Turn Lane at Pals Road/Highway 79 South, and Margarita Road Widening North of Rancho California Road RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive and file the Status Report on Winchester Interchange, Overland Bridge, Winchester/Nicolas Signalization, and Right Turn Lane at Pala Road/Highway 79 South. BACKGROUND: The following is a status report on the above mentioned project. Winchester Interchange - Caltrane has completed their review of the Project Report and have requested a Level of Service Traffic Analysis for all main lane sections, intersections, ramps, merge, diverge, and weave sections. This additional effort will involve obtaining the necessary traffic count data and performing evaluations for various traffic conditions. The plans and technical specifications are still in review at Caltrans. Caltrans expects to complete their review by the end of March, 1994. The Structural Engineer has been notified to proceed with the widening of the Santa Gertrudis Bridge and is scheduled to submit the plan to Caltrans by the end of March, 1994. Relocation plans for sewer and water lines within portions of Palm Plaza that will be affected by the construction are being prepared and will be submitted to the respective utilities for approval, It is anticipated that the project will be advertised for construction in December, 1994. The current construction estimate is $7,755,240. The plans for the construction of the right rum lane on the south side of Winchester Road east of Jefferson Avenue are in review at Caltrens. It is anticipated that Caltrans will complete their review by the end of March, 1994. II. Overland Overcrossina - The Project Report has been revised per Caltrans comments and resubmitted to them. The Structural Engineer has completed the Advanced Planning Study determining the type of bridge and submitted it to Caltrans, The pier r:tagdrpt~4~O40~mmuerpt~gn/mkg and abutment locations are necessary to complete structural plans and their location will affect the limits of Caltrens right-of-way and the configuration of the ACS perking lot. The plans and technical specifications am being revised to reflect the changes mandated by Caltrans during their initial review of the Project Report. The plans and specifications are 90% complete and will be resubmitted by the end of March, 1994. The current construction cost estimate is ~ 12,020,727. Staff is currently negotiating a contract amendment with J.F. Davidson Associates to cover unanticipated work items such as addition of Jefferson Avenue Improvements, EMWD sewer relocation, ACS perking reconfiguration, and various Caltrens changes. III. Winchester/Nicolas Sienalization - The Traffic Signal Design was completed and submitted to Caltrans for their review on March 1, 1994. It is anticipated that Caltrans will return their first plan check comments within six (6) weeks. IV. Rioht Turn Iane {EB to SB) at Pals Rosd/Hiohwav 79 South - Turning movement counts have been submitted to Caltrans for their review and 'preliminary design has been started. It is anticipated that the plans and technical specifications will be submitted to Caltrans by May 1, 1994. Margarita Road Widenino - Staff is negotiating a Reimbursement Agreement with Kemper Real Estate Development Company to expedite the construction of full width improvements on the east side of Margarits Road. The City will provide a funding mechanism that will allow Kemper to construct the improvements prior to the time frames established through the Development Approval Process and reimburse the City for the construction costs. The primary area of concern involves the use of prevailing wages and the requirements of the Public Contracts Code. FISCAL IMPACT: Future funding will be considered in the Capital Improvement Project. r:~gdq~t~94~40S~etatuemt.egN~kg ITEM N'O. 18 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNE~tr FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works\City Engineer April 5, 1994 Owl Rock Products, Wilson Creek Mine Owl Rock Sand and Gravel Surface Mining Operation in the Aguanga Area PREPARED BY: ~ Raymond A. Cssey, Principal Engineer - Land Development RECOMMENDATION: Receive and File. BACKGROUND: The above project is a Surface Mining Application, Surface Mining Permit No. 185, proposed by New Owl Rock Products. The project site is located north of State Highway 79 end east of Sage Road in the Aguanga area, within Riverside County's jurisdiction. An access road, approximately 3000 feet north of the intersection of Sage Road/State Highway 79, provides ~ access from the site to Sage Road. The site is located about 15 miles east of the City's easterly boundary at State Highway 79. An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) No. 382 has been prepared to address the impacts and their respective mitigation measures. Upon cursory review of the EIR, staff's opinion is that although the impacts have been addressed, the mitigation measures and monitoring mechanisms have not been adequately analyzed. For example, the generated traffic will be destined for the Interstate 15 via State Highway 79, through the City of Temacula. The existing Average Daily Traffic (ADT) is 18,000 on State Highway 79 between Pals Road and Interstate 15, according to Caltrans 1992 Traffic Volumes on California State Highways. The proposed project will generate an estimated 290 truck trips per day and 40 employee vehicle trips. Although the EIR indicates that there is "no change in the Level of Service (LOS)' and the increase in the number of overall trips seems small, it appears there may be a significant increase in truck traffic on State Highway 79. Staff has requested a copy of the project traffic study in order to evaluate this statement. In addition the .EIR dealt inadequately with the impacts on the Interstate 15/State Highway 79 intersection. Currently, at the intersection of Interstate 15/State/Highway 79, the truck turning radii at the ramps are substandard, especially the westbound to southbound on-ramp. The EIR -1- r:.%agdrpt%94%O405%owlrook 032894ekg states that intersection improvements must be implemented to improve turning radii for trucks and vehicular passing movements (page 1-23, section 1.4.9) but no mitigation measures are indicated for this location. The EIR however, does recommend certain improvements to State Highway 79 and Sage Rood at the immediate vicinity of the project site, The report recommends reconstruction of the roads and intersections in the immediate vicinity of the site within 2 years of the Board of Supervisors' approval, Noise impacts have also been analyzed by the' EIR. The EIR states that the hours of operation of the plant are from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. Monday through Friday. However, the early morning traffic when employees arrive and trucks haul their first loads is a concern. The report indicates that the pre-7 a.m. truck traffic shall be analyzed to verify that it does not exceed 20% of the total project site ADT in order not to significantly impact the nearby sensitive receivers. This is computed to be no more than 46 trucks in or out combined on public roads before 7 a.m. (the study only evaluates the immediate vicinity of the plant site). The EIR however, does not specify any monitoring mechanisms nor any implementing measures. The above application is scheduled to be presented before the Riverside County Planning Commission on April 13, 1994 at 2:00 p.m. FISCAL IMPACT: None -2- r:~agclrpt~4~)40b~owlrook 032894ekg ITEM NO. 19 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: NANCE OFFI~a~ TY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Tim D. Sedet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer April 5, 1994 Speed Undulation Re-design - Calle Pirm Colada PREPARED BY: Marry Lauber, Traffic Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council increase the maximum height of speed undulations on Calle Pifta Colada from two inches (2") to three inches (3'). BACKGROUND: Based on public input and discussion at the March 22, 1994 City Council Meeting, the Traffic Division of the Public Works Department has re-analyzed the Standard Design for Speed Undulations. The height of existing speed undulations on Calle Pirm Colada is two inches (2"). This design was derived from guidelines supplied by many communities through-out Southern California and from input received from the Temecula Valley Unified School .District. Although the speeds on Calle Pilm Colada have decreased, sporadic incidence of motorist flagrantly violating the existing speed limit are a continued concern of residences. The increase in height of the~xisting speed undulations should further help alleviate this problem. FISCAL IMPACT: Funds are available in the Fiscal Year 93-94 Public Works Street Maintenance Account No. 100-164-999-5402. Undulations - Additional Asphalt Paving 8 at Pavement Markings - Cross Hatching 8 at Traffic Control ~525.00 = $4,200.00' $100.00 = 800.00 ~850.00 = 850.00 TOTAL is 5,850.00 Attachment: Exhibit "A" - Speed Undulation Design Revision r.~mdq~S4~dreedee.eUa/p 12" REFLECTIVE WHITE 12' STRIPES L~ 6' O:C. ~ ~ 1' TAPER ("FYP) 1 /! ' 150' I , e. I W37AR' W6(15} I - INSTALL SIGN AND POST ,., , , ~' ',~BL' . B ; , i ~so' I 12oo'-2so'SPACIN,Gl ISO'I 4 I~ TYP CONSTRUCT 12' ASPHALT UNDULATION ~.. W3?AR W6{15} CURB FACE 2' MAX TAPER (WIDTH 12" VARIES) -~'.-:.:.' 7: '~ ':' SECTION 'B-B' A.C. STANDARD 3/8' MIX TACK COAT SECTION 'A-A' REFLECTIVE WHITE PAVEMENT MARK1NG'-~- DETAIL INSTALLATION DETAILS: 1, SPE[D UNOU/J,,TIONS SHALL NOT BE PLAC~D OVER MANHOLES, WATERGATES, JUNCTION CHAMBERS, ETC, 2. EDGE OF SPEED UNDULATIQNS SHALL BE S FE='T MINIMUM FROM EDGE OF DRIVEWAY, 3. WHENEVER PQSSIF~L~_ SPEED UNDULATIONS SHALL BE PLACED AT PROPERTY LINES INSTEAD OF MID-LOT. 4. WHENEVER PO-~SIELE SPE,cD UNDULATIONS SHALL BE PLACID ADJACENT TO '=:TRE,r't' UGHTS, 5. LOCATION OF SPc_=D UNDULATIONS TO BE DETERMINED BY CITY ENGINE;R, WARNING FLAGS (FIRST WEEF,1 / 30" X 30" W37R WARNING SIGN. BLACK ON YELLOW 6' SERIES 'E' LETTERS W6(15} SIGN W6(15) SIGN SIGN LOCATIONS: AS DIRECTED BY CITY ENGINE-'R REVISIONS OA': E INI:. !',ARP, CH. ZS, 19o, H ~.,'ICL APPROVED DAlE CITY OF TEMECULA STANDARD 3"'~" SPEED UNDULATION S |ANDARD NO. ITEM NO. 2O aYL/tWB OY ~ )'.AYOR8 ~ COUNOZLMF,)~w-RB CONFF, RENC~B OY it%V~RI%DB COUNTY MtTZCLB l: ~XZMQZ~AL OYYZCB Section 1.01 T~catton. The principal office of the conference for the transaction of conference business shall be located at the City Hall of the City Council of which the current ;haiz~a^ chatr/sex~axis a member. MtTZCLB ZI M~XB]RO Section 2.01 Clas- of Members. The conference shall have one class of members only. All members shall have equal voting rights, unless specified differently elsewhere in the Bylaws. (See Sac. 3.07) Section 2.02 O-a]4f4cattonl ~or Mmm~l~shtR. All elected mayors and councilmembers of the cities of ltiverside County shall be eligible for membership in t.he Conference. Section 2.03 Aamtemton. ~ualified individuals shall be automatically admitted to full membership in the Conference upon their ~4ali£1_~le~ certification for the office, either councilmember or mayor, =o which they were elected. Section 2.04 Termtnxt{on of Mem~eh~. Membership in the Conference shall cease as soon as a member~s successor in the office has been duly elected and ~ualifi.~ certified and admitted to membership in this Conference. MeTIt'Ll Ill Section 3.01 Rambler Meet{nee. Regular meetings of the members shall beheld on the second We~ week of~month or as host city selects. Section 3.02 pmxce of Me-t~n-I. The City in which regular meetings are held shall rotate among the member cities on a schedule which shall be determined prior to the beginning of each calendar year. The place of the meeting shall be selected by the host city. Section 3.03 Notice o[ Reg,,l~r Meetings. At least two weeks prior to the day of the regular meeting, the host city shall notify the Ohcir~a~. chair~[~ of the location selected for the meeting. At least ten'd~ prior to the meeting, the Chair~a~ shall send notice of the place of the meeting to the members. Section 3.04 S~ec4A~ Meet4nas. special meetings of the. membership may be called by a majority vote of the Directors. Notice of any such meeting must be given at least 48 hours in advance of said meeting and shall specify the purpose and the nature of business to be conducted at said meeting. Section 3.05 Ngt4ces. Notices of the time and place of regular meetings shall b · given in writing. Notice of the time and place of special meetings may be given in writing, or required to be given by these bylaws, and shall be directed to the City Hall or City Administration Office of each memberes city. Only one notice per city need be given. Section 3.06 Onor-m. The presence or absence of quorum shall be determined with reference to the number of cities represented by the members of the Conference. A quorum shall be present if members representing'a majority of such cities are present at any meeting · Section 3.07 Vot4ng. =.~k _~b~ The ma~ors or their designass shall be entitled to one vote on any matter presented to the members which requires a vote.* Voting for members of the Board-, of Directors and for appointments to any other committee, conference, or association to which the Conference may appoint its re resentative, shall be by secret ballot. All other matters requiring a v~e may be by vo'ce vote 1 otherwise directed by the Board. (*1 vote per Cit' un eSS 1 Section 3,08 Cona,,ct of Hastines. All meetings shall be conducted in accordance with accepted parliamentary procedures. The Ch---i,...a.. chatrJl~[f~k of the Board of Directors shall .conduct the meetings. ARTXCLB IV BOaaD OF DZRBCTOR2 Section 4.01 O,~q{f4c~t4on ~na N-m~er. Any member of the Conference who has at least one year left of elected office shall be eligible as a member of the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors shall consist of five members. Section 4.02 Selection of CxnaiAates. In October of each years nominating committee shall be appointed by the current Board of Directors. The nominating committee shall consist of three members. The nominating committee shall prepare a list of candida es for Directorships. Nominations shall also be accepted from the floor at the time of the election. Sac=ion 4.03 Time of [lection. Electionshall be held at the regular meeting in November of each year, with the chairpsrs~R alternaCing be=wean eastern and western cities. 1~ae fou~ ~na~didates receiving the highest number of votes, plus ~he immediate past chairman, shall be the Board of Directors. Elected Directors shall assume their positions at ~heregular meeting in December- Section 4.04 Term of Office. A Director shall hold office for a term of one year. A Director can be elected to a consecutive term, but no Director shall serve more than two terms in succession. Section 4.05 n, ties. It shall be the duty of the Directors| (a) To choose from among the Board, the officers of the Conference~ (a) (b) (c) (b) To choose nominees for election to the various committees, conferences and association on which this Conference is entitled to representations (c) To perform any and all other duties which may from time to time be necessary to promote the purpose of ~his Conference. Section 4.06 Removal. A Director can be removed from office by a majorityvo~e of the members only for cause. "Cause" shall be defined as follows: Willful failure to fulfill the duties Of a Director~ Commission of any crime involving moral turpitude~ Termination of membership status. Section 4 07 VacancJes. Any vacancies occasioned by .the removal, death' or resignation of a Di=ector shall be filled by appointment by the remaining Directors. If the remaining Directors cannot agree on an appoint=ant, they shall present two candidates to the membership a~ the next regular meeting held following the creation of the vacancy. The replacement Director shall then be chosen by majority vote of the members. Said Director shall serve for the remainder of the term to which the removed, deceased or resigning Director was elected. Section 4.08 ]llet{n-s. Directors shall meet the clay of and prior to the regular meetings of members, l/xlol~ and conduct such business as may come before them. Special meetings of the Board may b e called in the same manner as provided in Section 3.041 Notice of a special meeting shall be given as provided.in Section 3.95. Section 5.0~ N-m~er ~n~ T~tlem. The officers of the Conference shall be five in number and .shall consist of the following| (a) (b) C~atraaa, Chatz .nr ,-w~a Vice c.".aiz~c, Chalr~eraoa (c) Secretary (d) Treasurer (e) Immediate Past Chai~_e~. Chatr~~ Section 5.02 Selection.' Officers shall be elected from among the members of the Board of Directors by the members of the Board of Directors. Section 5.03 Duties of O~ficers. The duties of the officers shall be as follows: (a) Chaiz~.a..Chatrpexs~ The Ohai~_zAcha/rRgf~nsha11 (1) preside at all meetings of the Board of Direc~'i and the regular monthly meetings~ (2) notify the members of the location and time-- of each meeting; (3) perform such other duties as' may from time t~ time be determined by the Board of Directors. (b) Vtce-Chgiaa..Chairpe~e~: The Vice ehai~i.g,,Chatr~e[f~k~ shall preside in the a"F~nce of the ~hai~m&A chair~~and perform such other duties as may be assigned b'f'~he chatrBR~fM. (c) Secretary: The Secretary shall keep accurate minutes of all meetings of the Board and the members, certify the results of all elections, and perform such other duties'as may be assigned by the ChalP,..a.. chatr~e~ (d) Treasurer-' The Treasurer shall be responsible for such *~unds as maM from time to ~ime be collected by the Conference and ~x such other duties as may be assigned by the chatrpe~x ~d'the accountjng thereof ARTICLE VI Section 6.01 Amsessments. Wi~hthe approval of the members, the Conference may assess i~= .~cA~cro, ez the Cities' represented by the members, such amounts as may be required to pay the expenses of the Conference. ARTXCL! VXX BYLAWS Section 7.01 ~fmct4ve D,te. These Bylaws shall become effective upon their adoption by a majority of the members at any regular meeting and when certified by ~he Ohaim&~ Section 7.02 Amenament. These Bylaws may be amended, in whole or in part, upon recommendation of the Board of Directors, and by a vote of the majority of the members. I, Patricia L. Herron, Chairman of the Mayors and Councilmembers Conference of Riverside County, certify ~hat the foregoing Bylaws were adopted at the regular meeting held on May 8 1985, in Palm Desert. ' /s/ Parrlois L. Herron, Date: May 8, 1992 I, James O. Hyatt, certify that Z am the duly elected Secretary of the Mayors and Councilmembers Conference of Riverside county and that the foregoing Bylaws consisting of five pages is a true and correct col~ of the Bylaws adopted by the conference at a Regular Meeting held on May S, 1985 with the City of Palm Deser~ and executed by Pa~ricia L. Herron as Chairman. James O, Hyatt, Secretary 1994-02-02 !2:~2 pAg= = ITEM NO. 21 APP CIiT~ ATTOR ~. / TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager P 811 Gary Thornhill, Director of I ning~'' April 5, 1994 Status of Proposed Downsizing Ordinance PREPARED BY: John Meyer RECOMMENDATION: It is requested that the City Council and Planning Commission: Receive and File this status report on the preparation of the proposed downsizing ordinance. BACKGROUND On February 22, 1994, staff received direction from the Council to prepare an ordinance to regulate the size of residential units in approved tracts. On March 7, 1994, staff presented a report to the Planning Commission to get its concerns and recommendations on the subject topic. Example ordinances from the Cities of Murriets and Moreno Valley were also given to the Commission. COMMISSION DIRECTION' Upon receiving input fr6m staff and the general public, the Commission members provided staff the following comments: e Include criteria that considers the ratio of vacant lots to built lots. Consider reducing the average square footage of the homes in a tract, but not the minimum square footage. Be specific as possible when developing criteria for homes-within a "transition area" between larger and smaller homes. Consider a 10 to 15 percent limit on the reduction of homes sizes. Require landscaping of the reduced home be identical to the built homes. Get a clear legal opinion on the City's legal ability to regulate home sizes. It was the overall consensus of the Commission that the Murriets Ordinance was favored over the Moreno Valley Ordinance. CITY ATTORNEY In addition to the direction from the Planning Commission, staff has asked the City Attorney to also provide direction regarding downsizing ordinances and in particular on recent litigation involving the Moreno Valley Ordinance. PROCESS With the input received from the Commission, staff has begun to prepare a draft ordinance. · Prior to bringing the draft ordinance back to the Commission, staff will present it to the Temecula Coordinating Committee and the local Building Industry Association chapter. FISCAL IMPACT Because this ordinance is being prepared in-house, no expenditures of City funds is necessary. However, it is estimated this ordinance will require 28 staff hours to prepare at a cost of about $1000, not including the City Attorney's time. TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ITE.M 1 APPRO~~, CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Council FROM: Ronald Bradley, City Manager DATE: April 5, 1994 SUBJECT: Final Fee Credits for Paloma Del Sol Park PREPARED BY: ~,~Beryl Yasinosky, Management Assistant RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: Approve a final fee credit of ~$1,025,349 for Kemper Community Development Company for the construction and dedication of Paloma Del Sol Park. BACKGROUND: On December 8, 1992, the City Council approved an Amendment and Restatement of the Development Agreement between the City of Temecula and Bedford Development Company concerning the Paloma Del Sol Specific Plan. Pursuant to the amended agreement, Kemper Community Development Company, as successors in interest to Bedford Development Company, will receive a maximum credit of $2,000,000 towards City Public Facilities Fees, payable for building permits, in exchange for developing Paloma Del Sol Park and a future 7.44 acre park site. Based upon the preliminary construction cost estimate for Paloma Del Sol Park, the Community Services Commission and the Board of Directors approved a preliminary fee credit of $1,368,000 towards Public Facilities Fees. Upon formal acceptance of Paloma Del Sol Park by the City on January 25, 1994, Kemper Community Development Company submitted a "Fee Credit Analysis" to staff for review which indicated that the 'final park construction costs were $1,050,735. On February 8, 1994, the City Council approved an initial fee credit of $500,000 as a portion of the final fee credit to be approved, pending. staff review and verification of all construction costs associated with the development of the park. Staff has 'determined that all the invoices, contracts and retention payments associated with the construction costs of Paloma Del Sol Park, and allowed for fee credits pursuant to the amended Development Agreement, have been paid. The construction costs are summarized within the "Paloma Del Sol Park Credit Analysis", which is attached for your review. On March 14, 1994, the Community Services Commission approved an additional credit of $525,349 against Public Facilities Fees for Kemper Community Development Company. Coupled with the initial fee credit of $500,000 approved by City Council on February 8, 1994, the developer will receive a total credit of $1,025,349 towards Public Facilities Fees for the development of Paloma Del Sol Park. r:/yasinoblrJpds,cc 040594. FISCAL IMPACT: Upon final approval by the City Council, Kemper Community Development shall receive a total fee credit of ~1,025,349 against Public Facilities Fees, payable at building permits, for the development of Paloma Del .Sol Park· Pursuant to Section 12.10 of the amended Development Agreement, Public Facilities Fees, in the amount of ~3,000 for each building permit pulled, shall be paid through the final fee credit amount. This credit shall be retro-active to any building permits pulled after Council action on February 8, 1994. ATTACHMENTS: City Council Agenda, 2/8/94. Community Services Commission Agenda, 3/14/94. 'Paloma Del Sol Park Credit Analysis" r.\yaeinobk~nb~.e~m 040394 APPROVA CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA - t .~AGENDA REPORT TO: City Council FROM: David F. Dixon, City Manager DATE: February 8, 1994 SUBJECT: ' ' Fee Credits for Paloma Del Sol Park. PREPARED BY: (~rl~(2~lSeryl Yasinosky, Management Assistant RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: Approve an initial fee credit of ~500,000 for Kemper Community Development Company for the construction and dedication of Paloma Del Sol Park. BACKGROUND: On ~January 11, 1994, the Board of Directors approved the acceptance of the grant deed from Kemper Community Development Company for Paloma Dei Sol Park, a 9.50 acre sports complex located within the Paloma Del Sol Development, subject to the vacation proceedings for Campanula Way. On January 25, 1994 City Council approved the vacation of the roadway and the City officially assumed ownership of the park. The amenities of the park include two (2) baseball fields with soccer overlays, ball field lighting, bleachers, a 1200 square foot rest room\ snack bar facility, picnic tables, benches, signage, drinking fountains, refuse receptacles, walkways and on-site parking. Pursuant to the Amendment and Restatement of the Development Agreement for the Paloma Del Sol Specific Plan, dated December 8, 1992, in exchange for developing Paloma Del Sol Park and a future 7.44 acre park site, Kempe~ Community Development Company, is to receive a maximum credit of ~2,000,000 against City Public Facilities Fees payable for building permits. Based upon the preliminary construction cost estimate for this park, the Board of Directors approved a preliminary fee credit of ~1,368,000 towards City Public Facilities Fees. Kemper Community Development Company has submitted an itemized "fee credit analysis report" to the City for review that indicates the final construction cost for Paloma Del Sol Park is $1,050,735. 'Although staff is in the process of verifying the information provided within the report, this amount is considerably lower than the construction cost estimate that was originally projected by the Developer and approved by the City Council for fee credits. Until 'such time as staff has reviewed and verified the final construction costs identified in the report, the Developer is requesting that the City approve an initial fee credit of ~500,000 so they may move forward with obtaining building permits within their project. Initial review of the report indicates that this amount is reasonable and is in compliance with the intent of the Development Agreement. FISCAL IMPACT: The initial fee credit of 8500,000 will be applied towards final fee credit approved for this park facility. Following the review and verification of all construction costs associated with the development of this park, staff anticipates forwarding a staff report to the Community Services Commission on March 14, 1994 and City Council on March 22, 1994, which will identify the proposed final fee credit to be received by Kernper against City Public Facilities Fees. _:- yaein~bk%pds.feee 020894 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION SHA~/!~"~): NELSON MARCH 14, 1994 FINAL FEE CREDITS FOR PALOMA DEL SOL PARK PREPARED BY: G;)I~ RECOMMENDATION: Beryl Yasinosky, Management Assistant That the Community Services Commission: Approve a final fee credit of $1,025,349 for Kernper Community Development Company for the construction and. dedication of Paloma Del Sol Park... BACKGROUND: On January 25, 1994, the City of Temecula officially accepted the dedication of Paloma Del Sol Park, a 9.50 sports complex, from Kemper Community Development Company. The park is located in the Paloma Del Sol Development, at the southeast corner De Portola Road and Campanula Way. The amenities of the park include two (2) baseball fields with soccer overlays, ball field lighting, bleachers, a 1200 square foot rest room/snack bar facility, picnic tables, benches, signage, drinking fountains, refuse receptacles, walkways and on-site parking. Pursuant to City Council approval. on December 8, 1992 of the Amendment and Restatement of the Development Agreement for the Paloma Del Sol Specific Plan,. Kemper Community Development Company will receive a maximum credit of $2,000,000 against City Public Facilities Fees, payable for building permits, in exchange for developing' Paloma Del Sol Park and a future 7.44 acre park site. Subsequently, the Community Services Commission and the Board of Directors approved a preliminary fee credit of $1,368,000 towards Public Facilities Fees based upon the preliminary construction cost estimate for Paloma Del Sol Park. Upon dedication of the park to the City, the Developer submitted a "fee credit analysis" to staff for review that indicated a final construction cost for Paloma Del Sol Park of $1,050,735. Since this amount was considerably lower than originally approved by the Board of Directors for fee credits, the Developer requested that the City consider approving an initial fee credit of $500,000 so the~/could move forward with obtaining building permit.~ '~hin their project. On February 8, 1994, the City Council approved the initial fee credit of $500,000 as a portion of the final fee credit to-be approved, pending staff review and verification of all construction cosus associated with the development of the park. The review and verification of construction costs for Paloma Del Sol Park has been completed. The contracts, invoices, payment vouchers, and retention payments have been .submitted by the developer and reconciled to the "Paloma Del Sol Credit Analysis", a copy of which is attached for your review. Staff is recommending that Kernper Community Development Company receive an additional $525,349 credit against Public Facilities Fees. Coupled with the initial fee credit of $500,000 approve by City Council on February 8, 1994, Kernper Community Development Company shall receive a total credit of $1.,025,349 towards Public Facilities Fees for the development of Paloma Del Sol. Park. FISCAL IMPACT: Upon approval by the Community Services Commission and the CiW Council, Kernper CommuniW Development shall receive a total fee credit of $1,025,349 against Public Facilities Fees payable for building permits, for the development of Paloma Del Sol Park. A staff report is scheduled to be forwarded to CiW Council on April 12, 1994 for final approval of the fee credits. Pursuant to Section 12.10 for the amended Development Agreement, Public Facilities Fees, in the amount of $3,000 for each building permit pulled, shall be paid through the final fee credit amount. This credit shall be retro-active to any building permits pulled a~er Council action on February 8, 1994. Staff anticipates that the first 333 building permits obtained after this date will be entitled to receive the credit. Paloma Del Sol Park Credit Analysis roject Name: PDS SW Infrastructure (General Ledger Detail) top/"' Number: 5200/Kernper Community Development Company pate; ,/24/94 Rev.: 03/09/94 ; ene ral'. Led g e r Sum m a ry:: :-Th rou gk 1/2 129.. .ccount No. Line Item 1200 ICivil - Engineering - '. 1216 i Survey/Topo/Boundary 1260 iEnvironmental Assessment - Bio .1320 iPaleological 1340 ISoils Report 1420 iUtilitv Design 1425 IArchitect - Building Contract 1440 iLandscape Architect 1480 iPlans - Printing 1.520 iPermit & City Inspection 1562 lWater - Utility Ext. & Hookup 1566 IElectric - Utility Ext. & Hookup 1572 ~Sanit. Sewer- Utility. Ext. & Hookup 1574 {Inspection - RCWD & EMWD 1582 lK-Rat Fee 1620 I Joint Trenching 1660 l Site Grading & Earthwork ~-~670 lErosion Control 330 tSite Drainage '1700 ILandscaping & Harriscape Park 1760 IStreet & Paving 1761 ICurb & Gutter 1660 ]N.O.C. 6182 !Security 6188 IWeed Abatement/Discing 7700 IExtended Maintenance - Dec. 93 7710 iWater - RCWD Billing Dub-Total Costs ~paid:::T. hrOugh:.l/21294:::.:!::..:~::~!:i~:.!:;?:;!:;~:: Park Costs $14,665.00] $17,084.50J $0.00i $O.OOJ $12,740.00l $360.00~ $1,2oo.oo ( $13,357.081 $1,360.00 $32,886.25[ $3,600.00~ $0.00l $11.260.00 [ $o.ool $O.OOj $o.ool $141,o73.681 $0.00l $2,450.00l $743,544.49 $0.00 $6,870.00 $0.001 $0.001 $0.00 $4,533.20 $3,651.44 Offsite Costs $15,628.91i $30,293.91 $8,252.50 $25,337.00 $893.501 $893.50 $7,429.001 $7,429.00 $9,771.87 $22,511.87 $0.00 $360.00 $0.00 $1,200.00 $0.00 $13,357.08 $907.86~ $2,267.86 $9,772.501 $42,658.75 $42,830.00 $46,430.00 $4,003.52 $4,003.52 $58,627.00 $69,887.00 $6,885.00 $6,885.00 $17,062.50 $17,062.50 $56,643.20 $56,643.20 $0.00 $141,073.68 $5,613.96[ $5,613.96 $11,213.00 ~ $13,663.00 $0.94! $743,545.43 $31,005.54 1 $31,005.54 $21,011.90 [ $27,881.90 $5.001 $5.00 $168.381 $168.38 $250.001 $250.00 $0.001 $4,533.20 $0.00 ~ $3,651.44 : :Sl;010,635:64 i'.-==~:!':.$307;976:08 '::,' $1~318i6H.72':' ~dditional Park Costs Paid Through 319/94 ~ccount No.' Line Item 1700 IPaxk Sign w/Logo - Balance/Country Signs 1760 7700 7700 7710 7710 IDePonola Barricade/Lewis Valley IExtended Maintenance - Oakridge Landscape ISCE Opening. Bill IRCWD #1-25-10215 IRCWD #1-25-10216 Subtotal: .. Park Costs $2,577.72 $2,470.00 $4,533.20 $4,669.88 $233.15 $229.68 814,713.63 ITEM NO. 2 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: (ity Manager/City Council hewn D. Nelson, Director of Community Services April 5, 1994 SUBJECT: Sam Hicks Monument Perk Master Plan PREPARED BY: ~Phyllis L. Ruse, Senior Management Analyst'~~'' RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1. Approve the Master Plan for Sam Hicks Monument Park. 2. Adopt the Negative Declaration for the project. Authorize the preparation of construction documents end release · formal public bid for the project. BACKGROUND: On November 9, 1993, the City Council awarded · design contract for the preparation of · Master Plan for improvements at Sam Hicks Monument Park. On that same date, the Council directed staff to prepare an amended land lease between the City and the Old Town Temecula Historical Museum Foundation, providing for · footprint for the Foundation to construct · permanent museum facility and renovate St. Catherine's Church on the park site. The Council further directed that the necessary documents be prepared to provide for Redevelopment Agency funding for the project. Finally, it was recommended that the Foundation and the City master plan the entire site as a joint effort. A project committee was established with representatives from the City Council, Community Services Commission, the Museum Foundation, the Old Town Architectural Review Committee, the Old Town Redevelopment Committee, City and Museum deign consultants, senior citizens, and City staff. The project committee's first task was to identify the various potential user groups for the park and possible park activities determined by these groups. The Museum's needs were also considered. The committee then explored the opportunities and constraints presented by the site. The Museum Foundation and the City's consultant, The Alhambra Group, worked together to exhibit various conceptual designs that best matched the committee's goals. Each participant contributed valuable comments and suggestions and worked together in an atmosphere of partnership. At the conclusion of the third committee meeting, all members unanimously supported the proposed Master Plan. On March 7, 1994, the Master Plan was presented to the Planning Commission for comment. On March 14, 1994, the Community Services Commission conducted a noticed public hearing to receive community comment and testimony and to consider staff's recommendation, At the conclusion of the public hearing, the Commission approved the Master Plan with a modification to the parking lot near the restroom/snack bar facility and with the stipulation that the bid documents include an add alternate for the retrofit of the parking lot lights at the Senior Center to be consistent with the ones lights utilized at Sam Hicks Monument Park. .The Master Plan designates an ultimate footprint of 22,900 square feet for the Museum. The Foundation proposes building the facility in phases. Phase one will consist of a 6,100 square foot museum, a 1,800 square foot plaza area, a 1,000 square foot outdoor interpretive center, and the renovation of the existing church. The City's portion of the plan will include upgrading the tot lot to ADA standards, construction of a gazebo/bandstand facility, installation of · formal rose garden, courtyard, circulation paths, picnic facilities, improvements to the monument, a restroomlsnackbar, security lighting, landscaping and irrigation. Improvements made in the footprint for future development by the Museum Foundation have been designed to be aesthetically pleasing and functional as well as easily removable and cost effective when the time comes to replace them. It is anticipated that the revised lease and documents for Redevelopment Agency funding will be brought to the City Council and the Redevelopment Agency at their April 26, 1994 meeting. FISCAL IMPACT: This project was budgeted in the City's Capital Improvement Program for FY 1993/94. Design costs have been transferred from the Development Impact Fees, to be reimbursed with Redevelopment Funds. City of Temecula P!pnnin Department Initial Environmental Study I. BACKGROUND INFORMATION 1. Name of Project: 2. Case Numlgrs: 3. Location of Project: 4. Description of Project: 5. Date of Environmental Assessanent: 6. Name of Proponent: 7. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: Sam Hicks Monmneat Park Master Planffemecula Museum N/A Northeast corner of Moreno Road and Metcedes Street A long range lVlaster Development Plan for Sam Hicks Monument Park. The project includes a Museum that will be constructed in three (S)ph=es. Febnm-y IS, 1994 City of Tenv~!srrem~la Museum Association 43174 Bu~iv~s Park Drive Temsc,,ia, CA 92~90 (909) .694-6400 ENVIRONlVIENTAL IIVIPACTS (Explanations to all the answers are provided in Section IH) 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes geologic substructures? b. Disruptions, d~placements, compaction, or over covering of the soft? c. Change in topography or ground surface relid features? d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique . geologic or physical features? e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? f. Changes in sfitafion, deposition or erosion? g. The modification of any wash, channel, creek, river or lake? Yes M_a No X X X m R:WI'~IC:K~.E 2J17/14 klb 1 Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mudslides, liqudac~ion, grou_n~ falhlre, or simi!~ff hazards? i. Any development within an Alquist-Priolo Special Stadim Zone? Air. Will the proposal result in: a. Air emi.gsiom or det~riorstion of ambient sir quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors? Alteration of air movement, temperature, or moisture or any change in clinate, whether locally or regionally?. Water. Will the proposal result in: (~anges in currents, or the course or direction of waun' movements, in either marine or fresh wmrs? be Changes in absorption rates, drainage p___s~rm, or the x'a~e and amount of surface runoff?. c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? d. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to, temperatrite, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions, withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavatiom? Reduction in the amoum of water otherwise available for public water supplies? Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding? Plant Life. WHi the proposal result in: Change in the diversity of species, or number of any native species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)? X X X No X X X R:~"TAFFRPT~..kMHIC:ICS.IS 2/14/k~4 kJb 2 b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, threatened, or endangered species of plants.'? c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area of native ve~el~ion, or in a barrier ~ the normal repleni~hnq~ of existing species? d. Redu~on in the aerie of any agricultural crop? 5. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the divenity of species, or numben of any species of animals (animals includes all land animals, birch, reptiles, fish, amphibians, shellfish, benthic organisms, and/or insects)? b. Reduction of the numben of any unique, rare, au~tt--~d, or endangered species of animals? c. The introduction of new wildlife species into an area? d. A barrier to the migration or movement of animals? e. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat?. 6. Noise. Will the proposal result in: a. Increases in existing noise levels? b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? c. Exposure of people to severe vibrations? 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce or result in light or glare7 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in: a. Alteration of the present land use of an area? b. Alteration to the future planned land use of an area as described in a community or general plan? 9. Natural ~. WH! the proposal result in: a. An increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? b. The depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? X X X X R:~TAFFRPTIdeI~ICKS.IS 2/14/04 k/b 3 l 0. Risk of Upset. Will the proposal resul~ in: ll. 12. ae A risk of an explosion or the release of any hazardous substances in the event of an accident or upset conditions (hazardous substances includes, but is not limimd to, pesticicles, chemicals, oil or radiation)? be The use, storage, trampon or disposal of any hazardous or toxic materials (including, but not limit~ to oil, pesticicles, chemicals, or radiation)? Ce Possible in2rfereace with sn emergency response plan or an emergency evacuSion plsn? Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth ra~ of the human population of an area? Housing. Will the proposal affect existing homing or create a demand for additional housing?. 13. Transportslion/Cir~_dnfion. WHI the proposal result in: 14. a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parirlng? Ce Substantial impact upon existin~ mmspomuion sys~ms, inchdin~ public transpor2~ion? Aierstions to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? e. AlersZions to wSerborne, rail or air traffic? Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? Public Serviees. Will the proposal have substantial effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? b. Police proteaion? c. Schools? d. Parks or other recreational facilities? m X X X X X X X X X R:%STA~ICKS. IS 2/14t84 klb 4 e. Msimensm~ of public facilities, including rosds? f. Other governmemsl services: 15. EnesXy..Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial smounts of fuel or ~ b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources or energy, or require the developn2nt of n~w sources of energy? 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need fur new systems, or subsUmtial alterations to any of the following utilities: a. Power or nsmral gas? b. . Communications Sy~te!~? c. Water systems? d. Sanitary sewer systnm or septic tanks? e. Storm water dralna~ systems? f. Solid waste disposal systems? g. Will the proposal result in a disjointed or inefficient pattnn of utility delivery system improvemems for any of the above? 17. Human Hesith. Will the proposal result in: a. The creation of any health hszarcl or potential health hazard? b. The exposure of people to potential health hazards, including the exposure of sensitive receptors (such as hospitals and schools) to toxic pollutant emissions? 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in: Maybe X X X X X 19. a. The obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public? _ b. The creation of an aesthetically offensive site opera to public view?_ c. Detrimental visual impsets on the surrounding area? __ Recreafiou. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or qusntity of existing reaeSional r-~,ources or opporUmides? X R:%STAFFIFT"~IdVe4K::KS.IS 2/14/94 klb 5 The alteration or destruction of any paleomologic, prehistoric, archaeoloZical or historic site? b. Adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, struaure, or object?. c. Any poUmtial to csuse a physicsl chanZe which would affect U~iqU~ e~ni~ ~lra~ v~!ues? d. RestriCtions t~ e0fisting religious or sacred uses within the potendal imp. act area? X X X R:%b'TAFF~ICK$.IS 2/14/14 Idb 6 ttl. DISCUSSION OF THE ENVIRO~AL IMPACTS 1.a. No. The proposal will not result in unstable earth conditiom or changes in geologic substructures. The park will not require significant amounts of grading. Manufacturai slopes will be created at the portion of the site sdjsnmt to the Senior Cesmsr. Any unstable condiu'om will be mitigated through planting of slopes for erosion control (tlmst is consisUmt with Uniform Building Code Standards and Ordinance No. 4~7) and through proper compaction of the soils. Construction and grading for this development will not be sx deptls which would affect any geologic substructures. No impacts are foreseen as a result of this project. 1.b. Yes, The proposal will result in the disruption, displacement, compaction, or overcovering of the soil. All grading activity requires disruptiota, displacements, compaction and overcovering of the soil. The amount of disruption, disphtcem, mt. compaction and overcovering of the soil will be the minimllm amollBl Iloalod to realizes the project. No sig!fi~callt impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. I.C. Yes. The proposal will result in a change in the site topography and ground surfaz relief features. A majority of the site is relatively flaX. Additional grsiing is proposed for the project, therefore the topography and ground surface relief features will be modified. The newly cresled slopes will be similar to those created on the Seaior Center site. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 1.d. No, The proposal will not result in the destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physicsl fesmres. No unique geologic features exist on the site. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this projea. 1.e. Yes. Development of the site will result in increased wind and water erosion of sobs both on and off-site. Grading will ocazr during the construction phase for the project. In addition, the poential for wind and wate~ erosiota of soil will increase from the creation of m~mzfac~tred slopes on the eastern portion of the site that is adjacent to the Senior Center. Short-term impaCtS will be midgatecl through grading techniques that are col~istealt with Air Qtlafity regulatio!~ alld best grading prscfices. Long-ram iml~,acts will be mitigated through site landscaping ssl the construction of hardscape. Erosion control nmsms will be imp, !ems~ed as a condition of approval for the project and will have to be consistent with Uniform Building Code Standards and Ordinance No. 457. This will sure that no significant impam arise as a result of this project. Yes. The proposal will resttit in changes in siltation, deposition, and erosion. Reference response 1 .e. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 1.g. No. The proposal will not result in modifications to any wash, channel, creek, river or lake. None exist on the projea site, nor are proximate to the site. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. l.h. Yes. Development of the site will expose people and property to earthquake hazards because the pwject is located in Southern California, an area which is seismically active. Any potential impacts will be mitigated through building comtruction which is comistent with Uniform Building Code R:~T~ICKS.I~ 2/14/94 klb 7 1. i. 2.a,b. 2.c. Water 3.a. 3.b. 3.c. 3.d. standards and proper ground compsmion. The projea will not expose people or property to geologic hazards such as landslides, mudslides, ground failure or liquefmion. No known landslides are located on the site or pro~imMt,- to the site. The same is true for muclslidem. The project will expose people or property to geologic hazards such as ground failure or liquefaction because the projea is lotaxed in a liquefaXion/subsideuce zoee. (as identified in the City of Temecula General Plan Final Environmental Im,nsct Report). Again, potential impacts will be mitigated through building construction which is comistmt with Uniform Building Code standards and proper ground compaction. No significant i,mpscts are anticipated as a mult of this projea. No. The proposal does not include development within an Aiquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone as identified by the State of California, Resourue Agency Depathuent of Conservation Special Studies Zone Map. Therefore, no significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. Yes. The project will result in air emissiom and deterioration of ambient air quality in the short- run. Air emissions and objectionable odors will occur during the comtruction phase of the pwject. These impacts will be of short duration and are not comidered significant. There will be no air emissiom or deterioration of ambient air quality in the long run. No significant impacts are anticipated 8s a result of this project. No. The project wfil not result in alterations of air movement, temperature, or moisture, or in any change in clima~ either locally or regionally. The scale of the project precludes it from creating any significant impacts on the environment in this area. No. The proposal will not result in changes to currents, to the course or direction of water movements in either marine or fresh waters. The project site is not locm~ adjscent to marhe waters and is sufficiently removed from fresh water sources. No sigaificsm impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. Yes. The proposal w~! result in changes to absorption rates, drainage parterre and the rate and mount of surface runoff. Previously permeable ground will be rendered impervious by comtruction of bu~dings, accompanylug hardscape and driveways. While absorption r818 and surface runoff w~l change, impacts are mitigated through site design. Drainage conveyances w~l be required which will safely and adequately handle any of the runoff which is created by the realization of the project. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. No. The proposal will not result in alterafiom to the course or flow of flood waters. The project is adjacent to the one hundred and five hundred year flood plain; however, it is not located within an identified floodway. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. No. The proposal w~l 'not result in a change in the amount of surface water in any waterbody. I ~ndsc-wping on site will allow a significant amount of'time water to drain inw the ground. No signi~cam imp, acts are maticipated as a result of this project. R:'~%'TAFF~ICK8.1S 2/14/94 kJb 8 3.e. Yes, The proposal will result in dischargas into surface waters or in any alteration of surface water quality. Prior to issuance of a grading permit for the project, the developer will be required to comply with the requiretnents of the National Polhtant Disdm'ge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent has been filed or the project is shown to .be exempt. By complying with the NPDES requittozdts, any potential i,mpacts can be ~ to a level less than significant. Therefore, no significant i-~,acts are anticipated as a result of this project. 3.f. No. The proposal will not teetit in an alteration of the direction or rate of flow of groundwaters. Construction on the site will not be at depths sufficie~ to have a significant impact on ground waters. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 3.g. No. The proposal will not result in a change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions, withdrawals, or through inluc~tion of an aqulfer by cuts or excavations. Reference response 3.f. No significant i,mpacts ae ~ as a result of this project. 3.h. No, The project will not result in the reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies. Water service will ultimately be provided by Rancho California Water District (RCWD) upon completion of financial affangements betwee~ RCWD and the propert]/ owner. No signi~ca!lt impacts ale anticipated as a result of this project. 3.i. No, The proposal wHI not expose people or property to water related hazards such as flooding. Reference responses 3.c. and 3.d. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. Plant Life 4.a. No, The proposal will not result in a change to the diversity of species, or number of any native species of plants. The pwject is considered in-fill, With development surrounding it on all sides. h addition, the majority of the site being previously graded arid subsequently i,ml, roved. A small portion of the site will require additional grading; however, it has also been previously disturbed. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this projea. 4.b. No. The proposal will not result in a reduction of the numben of any unique, rare, threatened, or endangered species of plants. Reference response 4.a. 4.c. No. Development of the site will not result in the creation of a barrier to the normal repltmlahmeswt of existing species. Reference response 4.a. 4.d. No. The proposal will not result in a reduction in the acreage of any agricultural crop. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project since no prime farmland_, farmland of statewide or local importance, or unique farmland is located within the project site. 5.a.b.d.e. No, The projea will not result in a change in the diversity of species, or nmnbers of species of animals. The project site lies within the Riverside Comny Stephem Kangaroo Rat Habitat Conservation Plan Pre]im½nsry Study Area, however, the project itself will not im.nact the habitat of the Stephens Kangaroo Rat (SKR). The site has been previously developed and consists of R:~'I'AF~ICKS.IS 2/14/94 klb 9 stmaures, harriscape, lsn4sc~ping and din. The project is considered *in~!!* with development existing to the north, south, east and west. There is no potential for the change in the diversity and number (reduction) of the species, or in producing a barrier to the miXration of Stephem Kangaroo 1~ as well as the deterioration of its habitat exists within the project area. SKR Mitigation Fees are not required for the developm~ of parcels used by local governmmal entities (as per Section 10(e) of Ordinance No. 663). No other sensitive species have been identified upon the site. No significant impacts are anticipamd as a result of this project. 5.c. No, The proposal will not result in the introduction of any new wildlife species into the area. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. Noise Yes, The proposal will result in increases to existing noise levels. The site is currently utilized as a patio site and the project proposes to e~and the park use snd add a museinn. The m-seum and park will be used primm-ily during the day. htustate 1~ is located to the ent. Commercial uses exist to the north and west of the project. The Senior Center and Fire Deparunent are located to the south. These are not considered sensitive rccr, ptots as identified in the City of Temecula General Plan. No significsnt ',nnpacts from noise are anticipated as a result of this projea. 6.b. Yes. The project will expose people to severe noise levels during the development/construction phase. Commsaion mach~ is capable of producing noise in the range of 10 0+ DBA at 100 feet which is considered very annoying and can csuse hearing dsmage from steady 8-hour exposure. This source of noise will be of short duration and therefore will not be comidered significant. No significant impacts are anticipated either in the short- or long-run. 6.c. Yes, The proposal will result in the exposure of people to severe vibratiom during the development/construction phase. The vibratiom will be of short duration and therefore will not be considered significant. No significant in~,acts are anticipated either in the short or long run. Light and Glare Yes. The proposal will ultimately produce and result in light/glare, ~ devel~memt of the site will include new light sources. All light and glare has the potential to impact the Mount Palomar Observatory and surrounding development. The project is conditioned to be comistent with Ordinance No. 655 (Ordinance Regulating Light Pollution). No impacts are foreseen from light and glare. Land Use 8.a. Yes. The proposal will not significantly allmr the present land use of the' si2. The Master Plan will enhance and slightly expand the park and reloca2 the muse,m from its current Main Street location. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. R:~STA~ICKS.I~ 2114/94 Idb 8.b. No. The proposal will not result in an alterSion t~ the funue planned land use of the site as described City's General Plan. The General Plan land Use desipstlon for the site is Open SpsrgRsn'mion. The Old Town Specific Plan designstion for the site is Old Town Civic which is irqended to provide for public and quasi-public uses such ss parks sad m. se,,n~. No siSnificant impsas are anticipated as a result of this project. 9.a,b. Yes. The proposal will result in an increase in the rate of use of any natural resource or the depletion of any nonrenewable resource. Development of the site will result in an increase in the rate of use of natural resources (consUuaion materials, fuels for the daily operation, asphalt, lumber) and the subsequent depletion of these non-renewable natural resmsrc~. Due to the scale of the proposed development, these im,~ are not seen as significant. lUsk of U~e~ lO.a,b. No. The proposal will not result in a risk of explosion, or the release of any hazardous substances in the event of an accident or upset conditiom, since none are proposed in the request. The same is true for the use, storage, trampon or disposal of any hn-J,'dous or toxic materials. No significant impacts are anticip~_,L~4__ as a result of this project. lO.c. No. The project will not hU, fuc with an emergency response plan or an em~gency evaluation plan. The subject site is not located in an area which could impat an e, mugct~y response plan. The project will take atlas from mnintnined streeB (lVloreno Road axK! ~ Street) ~ will therefore not impede any emergmcy req)onse or uuugu~y wacum~n plaas. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this projea. Population ll. No. The project will not result in altering the location, distribution, demity or growth rate of the human population of the area. Pwjects of this nature do not cause people to reloca2. No significant imp~ are anticipated as a result of this project. Housir~ 12. No. Reference response 11. Projects of this nature do not cause people to relocate, and therefore, additional homing needs will not be aea2d. No significant i,mpacts are anticipated as a result of this project: Transportatioll/Ciresdofinn 13.a. No. The proposal will not result in the generation of substantial additional vehicular movement. The site is awrently used as a park and this use will be continued. The mu~e ,m component will not result in the generation of substantial additional vehicular movement since it will be included as a component of the park Master Plan. No significant impacts are eap~tecl from development of the site. 13 .b. Yes. The project will result in an increased demand for new parking. Forty-five (45) parking spaces will be provided on site (six spaces already exist, the rest will be provided under the Park Master Plan. Although, Ordinance No. 348 requires one parking space for every two employees plus one spsce for every 300 square feet of gross floor area, the projea is located within the Old Town Specific Plan Planning Area. Parking standards will not be the same as those required und~er 0rdinnnce No. 348. Any pote~jal i,m1~lcts Call be tttitigated by fllRlre parking lots that will be dispersed throughout the Old Town area. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 13.c. No. The proposal will not crea~ impacts upon existing transportation systems, including public transportation. All of the streets surrounding the project have been improved to their full-width. A Riverside Transit Agency (RTA) route is currently available in the srea (Front, Main snd Mercedes Streets). The project is not anticipated to impsct RTA's level of service. No significant impacts are anficipn_!erJ as n result of this project. 13 .d. No. The proposal will not result in alteratiom to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods. The site is cm~catly developed as a park and is ~ from streets that are already develolasd to their ultimnto. fight-of-way. No significsnt impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 13.e. No. The proposal will not result in alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic since none exists currently in the proximity of the site and none are proposed. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 13.f. No. The proposal will not result in an increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians. Future development of the si~e will not increase traffic hazards above current conditions. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. Public Services 14.a,b. No. The proposal will not have a substsntial effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered fire or police protection. The park and m-q~tam will incre, as, atally increase theneed for fire and police protection, however, due to the scale of the proposed development, these impaCtS are not seen as significant. 14.c. No. The proposal will not have a substantial effect upon or result in a need for new or altered school facilitim. Projects of this nature generally do not have effects upon the need for school facilities. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 14.d. No. The proposal will not have a substantial effect upon or result in a need for new or altered parks or other recreational facilities. The project wHI be beneficial to the Old Town Area and the City of Temoada as a whole because it will result in the msint~snce and enhance-mere of an existing park si~e. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this-project. R:~"'I"AFFIF'T%SAilg..ilCKS.IS 2/14/94 ~ 12 14.e. 14.f. 15.a. 15 .b. Utilities 16.a 16.b. 16.c. 16.d. 16.e. No. The proposal will result in a need for the mnint~n~Ce Of public facilities, including roads. Funding for maintenance of roads is derived from the Gasoline Tax which is distributed to the City of Teme~la from the State of California. Imams to curtrot and future needs for maintman~ of roads as a restfit of development of the site are incrememl, are not comidered significant. This is because the Gasoline Tax is sufficient to cover any of the proposed expenses. No. The proposal will not have a substantial affect upon or result in a need for new or altered governxnmtal services. No significant impacts are anticipatsd u a result of this projea. No. The proposal will not result in the use of substantial anmunts of fuel or energy. As mentioned in responses 9.a. and 9.b. the proposal my result in an increase in the rate of use of any natural resource or the depletion of any nonrenewable resource. Development of the site will result in an increase in the rate of use of natural resources (construaion ~ala, fuels for the daily operation, asphalt, lumber ) and the subsequent depletion of these non-renewable natural resources. Due to the scale of the proposed developmint, these imp am are not seen as significant. No. The project will not result in a substantial inaease in demand upon existing sources of energy, nor will the project require the development of new sources of energy. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. No. ~ne proposal will not result in a need for new systems or substantial alteratiom to power or natural gas. The project site is within pro~imiW of existing facilities. Development exisu to the north, south, and east of the site and they already receive these services. No significant in~.acts are anticipged as a result of this project. No. The proposal will not result in a need for new systems or substantial aimrations to communication systems (reference response No. 16.a.)? No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this projea. No. The proposal will not result in a need for new systems or substantial alteratiom to water systems. As mentioned in response 3.h., water service will ultimat~ be provided by Rancho California Water Distria (RCWD) upon completion of financial arrangements between RCWD and the property owner. 'No significant i~ are anticipated as a result of this project. No. The proposal will not result in a need for new systems or substantial alteratiom to sanitary sewer systems. The project is located within Eastern Municipal Wger District's (EMWD) sanitary sewer service area. Information contained in the ~ Plan Final Environmental Impact Report (Certified November 9, 1993) states that adequate facilities exist (and are proposed) which will adequately service the projea. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. No. The proposal will result in a need for new sysUnm or substantial alteratiom to on-site storm water drainaZe systems. The proposal will result in changes to absorption rates, drainage pn__-__orns and the rate and amount of surface nmoff. Previously penramble ground wH! be rendered impervious by constructionof buildings, accompanying bardscape and driveways. While absorption R:'~"rAFFN:rf~Ail41CKS.IS 2/14/94 kJb 13 rates and surface runoff will change, impacts are mitigated through site design. Drainage conveyances will be required which will safely and adequacy handle any ofthe runoff which is creat~l by the realization of the project. No significant impacts are micipated as a result of this project. 16.f. No. The proposal will not result in a need for new systems or subs~mtial alterations to solid waste disposal systems. Any potential impacts from solid waste created by this development can be mitigated through participation in any Source Reduction. and Recycling Programs which are implemented by the City. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 16.g. No. The proposal will not result in a disjointed or inefficient pattern of utility delivery system improvements for any of the above. (reference response No. 16.a.). No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. Human Health 17.a,b. No. The proposal will not result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard. Projects of this nature do not result in the creation of health hazards or potential health hazards. No significant impacts are antieip__n__~a__ as a result of this project. Aesthetics 18.a. No. The proposal will not result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public. None exist on site, nor are any proximate to the site. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 18.b. No. The proposal will not result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view. The site is currently being used as a park. The Master Plan component .shall serve to enhance the site. Elevatiom for the mum,m building will have to be approved by the Old Town Temecula Local Review Board; thereby ensuring compatibility with the Old Town area. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 18.c. No. The proposal will not result in detrimental visual impacts on the surrounding area. Reference response 18.b. Recreation 19. Yes. The proposal will result in impacts to the quality or quantity of existing recreational resources or opportunities. The site is currently used as a park site and this site will be _enhnm'ed via the Master Plan process. No significant impacts are snticipamd as a result of this project. Cultural Resoures 20.a. No. The proposal will not result in the alteration or deattuction of any paleontologic, prehistoric, archaeological or historic site. The site has been previously disturbed. The City of Temeada General Plan Enviro~tal Impact Report (Certified Novmnber 9, 1993) indicates that there is a low possibility that paleontologic, prehistoric, archaeological or historic sites exist on the subject project site. No'significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. R:WrAFFRP~SNV~ICKS.tS 2/14m4 Idb 14 20.b. 20.c. No, The proposal will not restfit in adverse physical or aesthetic effec~ to a prehistoric or historic building, structure or object. Reference response 20.b. No significant in~,acts are anticipated as a result of this project. No, The project will not have the potential ~o cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values. No "unique" ethnic ~ values exist on-site or in proximity to the site. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 20.d. No, The proposal will not result in restrictiota to exisdn,~ religious or sacred uses within the potential im,nact area. None curready exist on the si~e. No significant in~,ects are anticipated as a result of this projea. tab 15 lY. MANDATORY FINDING~ OF ~IGNIFICANCE Does the project have the potential to either: degrade the quality of the environment, substmially reduce the habitat of a fish, wildlife or bird species, cause a fish, wildlife or bird population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant, bird or animal species, or eliminnt~, ilnpORRzlt exaH!ples Of the major periods of California history or prehistoty?. Yes Does the project have the potential to achieve short term, to the disadvantage of long term, environmental goals? (A short term im,nact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long term im,nacts will endure well into the future.) Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project's impact on two or more separate resources may be relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environnlent is sigliificant. ) Does the project have enviromucntal effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly?. X V. DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME wDE MINIMUS" IMPACT FINDINGS Does the project have the potential to cause any adverse effect, either individually or cumulatively, on fish and wildlife resources? Wildlife is defined as "all wfid animals, birds, plants, fish, amphibians, and related ecological COmmUnitieS, including the habitat upon which the wildlife depends on for it's COntinued viability" (Section 711.2, Fish and Game Code). Yes No R:'~"TAF~ICK$.m 2114/'a,4. Idb 16 ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION w~l be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because the Mitigation Measures described on the ~tach~ shem and in the Conditiom of Approval that have been added ~o the project will mitigate any potentially significant impacts m a level of insignificance, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. /~~ ~" ~,, ~a'Nanz and Title R:~T~ICK$.IS 2/14/94 klb 17 RED'EVELOPMENT AGENCY ITEM ~,PPROV~T. FCiITY ATTORNEY /'~ NANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGI~ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Manager/Redevelopment Agency Board Members Mary Jane McLarney, Finance Officer April 5, 1994 Resolution RDA 94- Authorizing Investment in the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) PREPARED BY: Genie Roberrs, Chief Accountant RECOMMENDATION: That the Agency Members adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. RDA A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AUTHORIZING INVESTMENT OF DISTRICT MONIES IN THE LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND DISCUSSION: The City currently pools the cash of all funds and invests surplus funds in the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF)..LAIF allows $15 million to be invested for each City entity. Currently the City has accounts in the name of the City and Temecula Community Services District. The City is quickly approaching the $30 million limit and it is necessary to establish an account in the name of the Redevelopment Agency to allow continued investment in LAIF. The Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) is a special fund of the California State Treasury. The State Treasurer takes monies deposited in the fund by local governments and invests them in a pooled investment account in order to achieve the highest possible yields for the local governments. The State Treasurer is responsible for the control and safekeeping of all instruments of title for all investments in the Fund. The local governments determine the term of the investments and there is no penalty for early withdrawal. Cash can be withdrawn from the fund with as little as 24 hours notice. During fiscal year 1992/93 the fund paid an average yield of 4.711%. ending December 31, 1993, the fund paid an average yield of 4.376%. FISCAL IMPACT: None. During the quarter RESOLUTION NO. RDA 94- __ ARESOLUTION OF THE I~'3'sEV~OPIMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AUTHORIZING INVESTMENT OF DISTRICT MONIES IN THE LOCAL AGENCY WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 730 of the statutes of 1976 Section 16429.1 was added to the California Government Cede to ereate a Local Agency Investment Fund in the State Treasury for the deposit of money of a local agency for purposes of investment by the State Treasurer; and WHEREAS, the Board of Directon does hereby find that the deposit and withdrawal of money in the Local Agency Inv~t Fund in accordance with the provisions of Section 16429.1 of the Government Code for the purpose of investment as stated therein as in the best interests of the Temecula Redevelopment Agency. NOW, THElzI~-!~RE, BE IT RESOLVEB, the Redevelopmerit Agency of the City of Temecula does hereby authorize the deposit and withdrawal of Temecula Redevelopmerit Agency monies in the Local Agency Investment Fund in the State Treasury in accordance with the provisions of Section 16429.1 of the Government Code for the purpose of investment as Section 1. That the following Temecula Redevelopment Agency' of~cers/designees or their successors in office shah be authorized to order the deposit or withdrawal of monies in the Local Agency Investment Fund. Genernl Mnn~,er Name Title Signature' Assistnut City Man~er Name Title Signature Section 2. That the Secretary of the Agency shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution. PASSb~D, APPROV~D AND ADO~ this Sth day of April, 1994. ATTEST: Ronald J. Parks, Chairperson Secretary STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, June S. Greek, 5ecretaxy of the Temect~a Redevelopment Agency, HEREBY DO CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. RDA 94~ was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the Temecula Redevelopment Agency on the 5th day of April, 1994 by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: AGENCY MEMBERS: AGENCY MEMBERS: AGENCY MEMBERS: June S. Greek, Secretary ITEM NO. 2 APPROV ; 'Y' ~ ' CITY ATTORNE~ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Redevelopment Agency Board Members Ronald E. Bradley, Executive Director April 5, 1994 Authorization of Agreement for RDA Consulting Services PREPARED BY: Mary Jane McLamey, Finance Officer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the terms of the agreement for RDA Consulting services with PMW Associates and authorize the Chairperson to execute the agreement, subject to the approval of the Executive Director end the General Council as to the final form of the agreement. DISCUSSION: With the passage of AB1290 and the impending Memorandum of Understanding between the RDA and TZBG, Inc. (Zev Buffman), activities of the Redevelopmerit Agency (RDA) have grown in scope and complexity. In addition~ the deadline of December 31 for adoption of a Iow/mod housing plan is rapidly approaching and existing staff does not have the expertise to prepare such a plan to conform to RDA law. Therefore, staff recommends entering into a contract for temporary RDA consulting services with Marilyn Whisenand of PMW Associates. Ms Whisenand has extensive experience directing redevelopment agencies including Escondido and Costa Mesa. The scope of work for the contract shall include: Review and status of redevelopment and housing program activities within the City of Temecula; provide advice, assistance and technical support as necessary to meet the goals and objectives of the City and Redevelopment Agency. With the assistance of existing staff, prepare the implementation plan and housing compliance plan which are required to be adopted prior to December 31, 1994 in accordance with new legislation (AB1290). Calculate the Redevelopment Agency's "excess surplus" housing funds (required by AB1290) and develop an excess surplus expenditure plan. The plan will meet all legal requirements and will provide a framework for future policy decisions with respect to the use of housing funds. R:WORTONLt,4GENDASIRDACON$.AGN 3/29/94 Represent the City of Temecula and its Redevelopment Agency in negotiations with prospective developers, including TZBG, Inc. who have proposed an entertainment center for Temecula Old Town. Provide instruction and training to existing staff with respect to the administration of redevelopment and housing programs including new requirements resulting from the passage of AB1290. Although the contract only runs through July 31, 1994, the above scope of services includes sufficient training for existing staff to carry on with redevelopment activities including the housing element after the contract has expired. Compensation shall be $95.00 per hour up to 30 hours per week. Time over 30 hours shall be compensated at $120.00per hour. Staff estimates a $35,000expenditure for this contract for the balance of FY 1994. FISCAL IMPACT: Sufficient funds exist in the RDA consulting budget to fund this contract through June 30, 1994. The balance of the contract will be included in the FY 94-95 budget. Attachments: PMW Associates Biography - Marilyn Whisenand PMW Associates Resume on Marilyn Whisenand Client List Consultant Services Agreement R:INORTONLtAGENDASIRDACONS. AGN 3/29/94 P M W Associates 232 West Avenida Gaviota, San Clemente, California 92672 (714)498-7085 FAX (714)498-8262 BIOGRAPHY MARILYN WHISENAND- Ms. Whisenand, Executive Vice President and co- owner of PMW Associates, is an independent consult- ant under contract to a number of public and private sector clients involved in the planning and implemen- tation of redevelopSent, economic development and housing activities. A specialist in public/private partnerships, Ms. Whisenand has had over 20 years of experience in negotiating and administering development agree- ments for major retail, commercial and residential projects. She has served as Executive Director of Redevelopmeat Agencies in Costa Mesa and Escou- dido, California and Auggrant Vice President of the Centre City Development Corporation, San Diego, California. Ms. Whisenand holds a degree in Business Adminis- tration from the University of Redlands and a Certificate in Real Estate. A licensed California 'Real Estate Broker, she received a fellowship from the National Endowment for Humanities for in- residence postgraduate work in economics at Prince- ton University in 1977. Ms. Whisenand is a full member of the Urban Land Institute, tht California Association for Local Economic Development and the Community Redevelopmeat Agencies' Association. Awards received for projects completed under the direction of Ms. Whisenand include, the Department of Housing and Urban Development "Certificate of National Recognition" for innovative use of public/private partnership for the Lincoln Park Mesa multi-family residential project in Costs Mesa, California; the American Planning Association *Meritorious Program Award*, the Urban Land Insti- tute "Award of Excellence*, and the Pacific Coast Builders' Conference *Golden Nugget Award* for the Costs Mesa Courtyards, a mixed-use retail/commer- cial development in downtown Costs Mesa; and the Urban Land Institute *Award of Excellence* for the Escondldo Civic and' Cultural Center, a 116 million dollar Civic and Cultural complex in downtown Escondldo, California. P M W Associates 232 West Avenida Gaviota, San Clemente, California 92672 (714) 498-7085 FAX (714) 498-8262 MARILYN WHISENAND 232 West Avenida Gaviota San Clemente, CA 92672 Telephone: (714) 498-3951 (home) (714) 498-7085 (work) (714) 498-8262 (FAX) EDUrATION B.S. Business Administration, University of Redlands Real Estate Certificate, San Diego City .College Economics Fellowship, National Endowment for the Humanities; Princeton University BUSINESS HISTORY March 1986 Present Principal and co-owner of PMW Associates, a corporation providing economic development, redevelopment, and housing services on a consultant basis to a variety of public and private organizations. March 1986 to May 1991 Executive DIrector Community Development Commission-City of Escondido, Califor- nia Served as Executive Director, under contract to the Community Development Commission, responsible for planning, financing and construction of a S116 million Civic Center and Cultural Arts Complex including City Hall, Regional Government Offices, Performing Arts Theaters, a Fine Arts Museum and Conference and Convention Facilities. Administered redevelopment activities within a 3,000 acre redevelopmeat area including downtown revitalization elements and a $55 million housing program. Managed a professional staff of ten along with numerous consult- ant contracts. In addition, with the approval of the Community Development Commission, maintained a private consulting practice contracting with a variety of public and private sector clients. MARILYN WHISENAND BUSINESS HISTORY (coat.) Page 2 April 1982 to March 1986 Executive Director Redevelopmeat Agency-City of Costa Mesa, California Administered redevelopmeat projects within Costa Mesa's 275 acre downtown redevelopmeat area. Responsible for the negotia- tion, financing and structuring of public/private partnerships resulting in the development of approximately $75 million of housing and commercial projects. Awards received for these projects include the Department of Housing and Urban Development Certificate of National Recog- nition for innovative use of a public/private partnership; the American Planning Association Meritorious Program Award; the Urban Land Institute Award of Excellence; and Pacific Coast Builders' Conference "Golden Nugget* Awards for the best retail commercial project and the best commercial/industrial mixed-use plan in the fourteen western states. August 1977 to March 1982 July 1975 to August 1977 Assistant Vice President Centre City Development Corporation-San Diego, California Responsible for redevelopmeat activities within downtown San Diego, administered all facets of redevelopmeat implementation including financial planning; land acquisition/disposition and negotiation of development agreements. Managed twelve profes- sional staff and numerous consultant contracts; prepared and administered a $49 million annual budget, Actively participated in the negotiation, financing, and development of the Hotton Plaza project, a mixed-use urban regional shopping center, and two market rate housing projects, Marina Park nnd Park Row. Personally responsible for the planning, financing and construe- tion management of three high-rise senior citizen housing devel- opments totaling 845 units. Management Assistant to the City Manager City of San Diego-San Diego, California Responsible for the administration of a $10.5 million Communi- ty Development Block Grant Program, and the coordination of various EDA funded projects. Responsible for the reorganization and management of the City's Housing and Community Develop- ment Department. MARILYN WHISENAND BUSINESS HISTORY (cont.) Page 3 July 1970 to July 1975 Community Development Specialist City of San Dicgo-San Diego, California Served as Project Manager for an 18 acre industrial development project in addition to responsibility for city-wide relocation as- sistance programs. October 1965 to June 1970 Director of Relocation and Property Management/ Executive Director Indio Housing Authority Redevelopment Agency, City of Indio, Indio, California Responsible for establishing and implementing acquisition, relo- cation and' property management programs for two federally fundcd urban renewal projects. Established local Housing Au- thority and served as its Executive Director. AFFILIATIONS AND ALHIi::Vt=MbN's MEMBERSHIPS o Named Woman of the Year in the San Diego Construction Industry by the Building Contractors Association-1981 o Awarded "Tribute to Woman and Industry* by the San Diego County YMCA 1981 o Licensed California Real Estate Broker o Extensive Public Speaking o Expert Witness on Redevelopment and Public Acquisition Matters o Awarded "Certificate of National Recognition' by the De- partment of Housing and Urban Development o Awarded "Meritorious Program award" by the Urban Land Institute; 'Award of Excellence" on the Pacific Coast Builders' Confcrence; "Golden Nugget award' for the Costs Mesa Court- yards o 'Award of Excellence' by the Urban Land Institute for the Escortdido Civic and Cultural Center o California Association for Local Economic Development o California Redevelopment Agencies Association o Full member - Urban Land Institute P M W Associates 232 West Avenida Gaviota, San Clemente. California 92672 (714)498-7085 FAX (714)498-8262 REDEVELOPMENT DIVISION CLIENTS - 1992/1993- CITIES Redevelopmeat Agency CITY OF ANAHEIM Redevelopmeat Agency CITY OF COSTA MESA Redevelopment Agency CITY OF FONTANA Redevelopmeat Agency CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH REFERENCE SERVICES PROVIDED James D. Ruth City Manager 200 S. Annhelm BIrd. Annhelm. CA 92085 (714)999-5165 Redevelopmeat Plan implementation/ negotiations with developer of commercial/residential development. Allan Roeder City Manager 77 Fair Drive Costa Mesa, CA 92626 (714)754-5327 Developer selection and negotiations for $35 million mixed-use project, including hotel, residential, retail and commercial use. Full range of redevelopmeat admin= istration, including analysis of financial alternatives. direction of acquisition and relocation program. _ John O'Sullivan City Manager 8353 Sierra Avenue Funtans, CA 92335 (714)350-7654 Redevelopmeat Plan implementation, including negotiation for development agreement for promotional retail center. Michael Uberuaga Redevelopmeat Plan implementation/ City Manager negotiations with developer and property 2000 Main Street owners for mixed-use development. Huntington Beach, CA 92648 (714)960-g899 Redevelopmeat Agency CITY OF PALMDALE Robert W. Toone, Jr. City Administrator 708 E. Palmdale Bird. Palmdale, CA 93550 (805)273-3126 Developer selection and negotiations for a regional shopping center, imple- mentation planning, coordination of redevelopmeat activities. 1 CLIENT REFERENCE SERVICES PROVIDED Redevelopment Agency CITY OF POWAY Redevelopmeat Agency CITY OF SANTEE Redevelopmeat Agency CITY OF TUSTIN Redevelopmeat Agency CITY OF LA PALMA Redevelopmeat Agency CITY OF ONTARIO Redevelopmeat Agency CITY OF PLACENTIA RedeveLopmeat Agency CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE Jim Bowersox City Manager 13325 Civic Center Drive Poway,CA 92064 (619)748-6600 Negotiations for the purchase and con- version to city ownership of a 265 space mobile home park. Structured a convet- '. sion plan and administered its implemen- tation. Reba Wright Quastler Director of Planning Services 13325 Civic Center Drive Poway, CA 92064 (619)748-6600 Ronald L. Ballard City Manager 10765 Woodside Avenue Santee, CA 92071-3198 (619)562-6153 Implementation planning, coordination of market and project feasibility studies, developer negotiations, coordination of tax allocation bond sales. William Huston City Manager 300 Centennial Way Tustin, CA 92680 (714)544-8890 All aspects of redevelopment, adminis- tration, including developer negotiations, financial planning, financing, and legis- lative analysis. Pamela Gibson City Manager 78922 Walker Street La Palma, CA 90623 (714)523-7700 Preparation of Request for qualifica- tions; developer negotiations Housing Set-Aside Plan. Norman Priest Executive Director 303 East B Street Ontario, CA 91764 (714)986-1151 Redevelopment Plan Feasibility Study. Robert D'Amato City Manager 401 East Chapman Placentia, CA 92670 (714)993-8231 Redevelopment Plan Feasibility Study; Redevelopment Plan Adoption Housing Set-Aside Plan. Mike Parness City Manager 100 Avenida Presidio San Clemente, CA 92672 (714)361-8229 Economic Development; Strategy/Housing Set-Aside; Plan/Developer Negotiations. 2 CLIENT REFERENCE SERVICFS PROVIDED Redevelopmeat Agency CITY OF DANA POINT McKellar Development La Julia, CA San Diego State University Foundation Redevelopmeat Agency CITY OF ESCONDIDO William Talley City Manager 33282 Golden Lantern Dana Point, CA 92629 (714)248-9890 Economic Development; Redevelopmerit Plan Feasibility Study. Christopher McKellar Redevelopmerit Planning; Chief Executive Officer Implementation/Public-Private Financing. 1250 Prospect Street, Ste. 10:3 La Julia, CA 92122 (619)4593891 Harry Albers General Manager 5178 College Avenue San Diego, CA 92182 (619)594-5771 Project Management of a $175 million dollar redevelopment project including student housing, retail/commercial and hotel uses. Doug Clark City Manager 201 North Broadway Escondido, CA 92626 (619)741-4631 Project Management of a $101 million dollar cultural arts project; Downtown Revitalization; Housing Set-Aside Program. P M W Associates 232 West Avenida Gaviota, San Clernente, California 92672 (714) 498-7085 FAX (714) 498-8262 :- ONSULTANT SERVIc-F-q AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made at TemecUla, California as of , 1994 by and between THE CITY OF TEMECULA (*CITY*), AND PMW ASSOCIATES, INC. (*CONSULTANT*), who agree as follows: Services: Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement, Consult- ant shall provide City with the services described in Exhibit *A.* Payment: City shall pay Consultant for services rendered pursuant to this Agreement at the time and in the manner set forth in Exhibit *B.* The payments specified in Exhibit *B* shall be the only payments to be made to Consultant for services rendered pursuant to this Agreement. Consultant shall submit all billings for said services to City in the manner specified in Exhibit *B.* Staff Assistance and Information: City shall, at its sole cost and expense, furnish all staff assistance and information which may be required for furnishing services pursuant to this Agreement as defined in Exhibit *A.* General Provisions: The general provisions set forth in Exhibit *C* are part of this Agreement. In the event of any inconsistency between said general provisions and any other terms or conditions of this Agreement, the other terms or conditions shall control only insof at as they are inconsistent with the general provisions. Exhibits: All exhibits referred to herein are attached hereto and are by this refer- ence incorporated herein. EXECUTED as of the day stated above. CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA By: PMW ASSOCIATES By: E~~v~~desident EXHIBIT "A" SCOPe- OF ~,RVIC~-R Marilyn Whisenand, through PMW Associates, will act as interim staff to the City of Temecula, responsible for the planning and implementation of all redevelopment and housing programs. The specific scope of services is summarized as follows: Review the status of redevelopment and housing program activities within the City of Temecula; provide advice, assistance and technical support as necessary to meet the goals and objectives of the City and Redevelopment Agency. With the assistance of existing staff, prepare the implementation plan and housing compliance plan which are required to be adopted prior to Deeera- ber 31, 1994 in accordance with new legislation (ABI290). Calculate the Redevelopment Agency's "excess surplus" housing funds (required by ABI290) and develop an excess surplus expenditure plan. The plan will meet all legal requirements and will provide a framework for future policy decisions with respect to the use of housing funds. Represent the City of Temecula and its Redevelopment Agency in negotia- tions with prospective developers, including TTBG, Inc. who have proposed an entertainment center for Temecula Old Town. Provide instruction and training to existing staff with respect to the admin- istration of redevelopment and housing programs including new require- ments resulting from the passage of ABI290. METHOD AND TIMF- OF PF-RFORMANCE Consultant Shall perform the various services described herein only as and when requested by the City and within a time schedule as mutually agreed upon by the parties to this Agreement. EXHIBIT 'B' COMPF-NSATION Hourly Rate: PI~4W will provide the services of Marilyn Whisenand for 30 hours per week during the contract period at the rate of $95.00 per hour. Services performed above 30 hours each week will be billed at $120 per hour. Direct Expense: Directly related expenses will be billed at their actual cost; mileage will be billed at $.26 per mile. Word processing and/or administrative support, if any, provided by PMW Associates will be billed at the rate of $25.00 per hour. METHOD OF PAYMENT Consultant shall submit requisitions to City for the services completed. City shall pay Consultant within thirty (30) days in accordance of such requisitions. EXHIBIT 'C" Indeoendent Contractor. At all times during the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall be an independent contractor and shall not bc an employee of the City. City shall have the right to control Consultant only insofar as the results of Consultant's services rendered pursuant to this Agreement; however, City shall not have the right to control the means by which Consultant accomplishes services rendered pursuant to this Agreement. Time. Consultant shall devote such time to the performance of services pursuant to this. Agreement as may be reasonably necessary for satisfactory performance of Consultnnt's obligations pursuant to this Agreement. Consultant Not Anent. Except as City may specify in writing, Consultant shall have no authority, express or implied, to act on behalf of City in any capacity whatsoever as an agent. Consultant shall have no authority, express or implied, pursuant to this Agreement to bind City to any obligation whatsoever. Assinnment Prohibited. No party to this Agreement may assign any right or obligation pursuant to this Agreement. Any attempted or purported assignment of any right or obligation pursuant to this Agreement shall be void and of no effect. Channes. The City may, from time to time, request changes in the Scope of Services of the Agreement to be performed hereunder. Such changes, including any increase or decrease in the amount of Consultant's compensation, which are mutually agreed upon by and between the City and the Consultant, shall be incorporated in written amendments to this Agreement. Notice of Termination. This Agreement may be terminated by the either party upon thirty (30) days written notice to the other. The effective date of caneella- tion being the 30th day of said written notice with no further action by either party. Termination. Upon termination of this Agreement by City, and written notifica- tion to the Consultant, Consultant shall be entitled to the compensation earned by it prior to the date of termination, computed pro rata up to and including the date of termination. Disclosure. Consultant's Principal, Marilyn Whisenand, is a licensed California Real Estate Broker. However, in performing services under this contract, consultant's assigned staff arc not acting in the capacity of a real estate broker nor will they act as broker or receive commission as broker for any other party in connection with this assignment. Indemnification. City agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless Consultant from and against any and all claims, demands, damages of any kind or nature, including attorney's fees, resulting from Consultant's work performed on behalf of City 'under the terms of this agreement, excepting any claims due to the willful negligence of Consultant. I0. Notice. All notices and other communications from either party to the other under this agreement shall be in writing and addressed to such party at its address set forth below. Either party may, by notice in writing to the other, change its ad- dress for receipt of notices and other communications. Any notice or other communications sent by mail, telex, telegraph, mailgram 5r fax shall bc deemed to have been given on the day such notice or communication was sent. Consultant: Marilyn Whiscnand Executive Vice-President PIVI~' Associates 232 West Avenida Gayiota San Clcmcnte, CA 92672 Foundation: Ron Bradley City Manager City of Temccula 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 11. Consultant's Assistant(s). Consultant may from time to time employ the services of employees or agents to assist the Consultant in the performance of Consultant's duties hereunder; provided, however, that the Consultant shall be solely responsible for any such agents or employees, including their performance, direction, control, supervision and compensation. 12. Attornev's Fees. If any action or suit in law or equity is instituted by or against City or Consultant for breach, enforcement or interpretation of or otherwise in- volving this agreement, the party prevailing in such action or suit shall be entitled to the award of reasonable attorneys' fees in addition to whatever other relief such party may bc entitled to. 13. Return of Materials at Termination. In the event of any termination' of Consult- ant's appointment, with or without cause, Consultant will promptly deliver to City all materials, property, documents, data, and other information belonging to City. Consultant shall not take any materials, property, documents or other information, or any reproduction or excerpt thereof, belonging to City. 14. Ownership of Work Product. Any and all of the work product performed and/or developed by Contractor pursuant to this Agreement shall be the sole property of City. City shall become and be the sole owner thereof and Consultant shall retain no ownership, interest or rights therein. 15. Severability. If any provision of this Agreement is found by a court of competent jurisdiction to be void, contrary to existing laws or regulations or otherwise in- valid, or unforesccable, the. remaining provisions hereof shall not be affected thereby and shall remain in full force and effect. 16. F. ntire Affreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties hcreto with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes any prior or contemporaneous oral or written agreements, understandings, promises and repre- sentations made by either party to the other concerning the subject matter hereof. This agreement cannot be changed or terminated orally and may only be changed on behalf of either party in writing. ITE'M NO. 3 APPROVAT. CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Manager/Redevelopment Agency Board Members Ronald E. Bradley, Executive Director ~1~ · ~' April5,1994 Authorization of Agreement for Development Advisory Services for the RDA PREPARED BY: Mary Jane McLarney, Finance Officer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the terms of the agreement for Development Advisory Services with Price Waterhouse and authorize the Chairperson to execute the agreement, subject to the approval of the Executive Director and the General Council as to the final form of the agreement. DISCUSSION: On March 22, 1994 the City Council authorized an appropriation for studies related to the Memorandum of Understanding with TZBG, Inc. (Zev Buffman). One of the studies is to analyze the economic feasibility of the proposed project. Staff solicited and received a proposal from Price Waterhouse. Staff requested this proposal based on the extensive experience the firm has in performing studies for the entertainment industry. The scope of work as fully described in the attached proposal is as follows: Define the approximate level or scale of development (number and size of theater) sufficient to: Establish a "destination attraction" and Retain the long term commitment of a qualified developer/promoter/manager and . Produce sufficient net cash flow to obtain capital funding and Support related uses in the TRC area Estimate levels of visitor activity generated by the theater complex and requirements for the infrastructure and other activities needed to support that activity (parking, traffic flow, site size and location requirements and destination marketing). Estimate the level or range of economic and fiscal impacts generated by the proposed development. The cost of the study will not exceed $75,000 and is anticipatedto be completed in four to five months. FISCAL IMPACT: Sufficient funds exist for the City's portion of the fee. The .balance will be billed to TZBG, Inc. Attachment: Price Waterhouse proposal Su~ie 280C' 400 Nc~.~ Asme; S~ree: P O, Box 2645 Tamps, FL 33601-2640 Price Haterhouse March 23, 1994 Mr. Ronald Bradley Interim City Manager City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive Temeeula, CA 92590-3606 Dear Mr. Bradley: Thank you for inviting the Price Waterhouse Development Advisory Group to submit this proposal-agreement to provide economic planning services to the City of Temeeula. This letter will describe our understanding of the background and objective of the assignment, proposed scope of services, qualifications to perform these services, time and budget requirements, terms of the engagement and authorization to proceed. If, after reviewing this letter, you believe modifications to this proposed scope of services would better suit your needs, we would be pleased to discuss this with you. Background and Objectives of the Assignment The City has adopted a Specific Plan for Old Town with the overall objective of creating "a dynamic Old Town commercial and residential eore...providing a viable economic setting for local and tourist commercial uses,...and residential uses...". The plan includes zoning, development regulations, incentives and procedures to accomplish this goal. Our understanding of the specific means by which this goal will be accomplished and the economic planning issues to be considered is based on: · Review of Old Town Temecula Specific Plan · Discussions with Dawe Dixon, former City Manager and yourself over the past 3 months · Review of proposed entertainment development prepared by Zev Buffman · Tour of Old Town March 2 and subsequent review of maps, plans, aerial photo and video of area provided by your staff The renovation and redevelopmerit of Old Town will be dependent, in large part, on attracting a sufficient level of non-resident visitors to the at~t to support the retail shops, food/beverage establishments and lodging facilities for the Tourist Retail Core CFRC) and the Highway Tourist Commercial (!tTC) areas contained in the plan. These non-residcnt visitors will be drawn to the Old Town area by existing special. events and Mr. Ronald Bradley Page 2 attractions (historic buildings, wine/balloon festivals, antique shops, etc.) and the proposed entertainment facilities to be developed by Mr. Zev Buffman, namely: Opera House: Cabaret Theaters: Wild West Arena: Showboat: 950 seat proseenium theater 2 @ 600 seats each 4,800 seat "show tent" 600 person capacity (450 seated) In addition, the Buffman plan includes several additional physical facilities and theatrical presentations which will link the primary entertainment or "anchor" theaters to Old Town with: · Saloons. · Virtual Reality Presentations · Production Studio CI'V, Radio, Recording) · Outdoor Entertainment · Competitions, games, festivals, award/tribute shows, etc. It is planned that the anchor theaters and support amenities will be fully integrated and compatible with other major elements of the Old Town development: commercial, civic and residential. Moreover, the "anchor" entertainment establishments will be the primary attractions which draw the additional visitors needed to support the redevelopment of Old Town - to make it, in the words of the Specific Area Plan, "an economically viable setting." The economic and financial planning for the development of this entertainment complex must include sufficient economic analysis to insure the following objectives are met: 1. Define the approximate level or scale of development (number and size of theater) sufficient to: · Establish a "destination attraction" and · Retain the long term commitment of a qualified developer/promoter/manager and · Produce sufficient net cash flow to obtain capital fuming and · Support related uses in the TRC area 2. Estimate levels of visitor activity generated by the theater complex and requirements for the infrastructure and other activities needed to support that Mr. Ronald Bradley Page 3 activity (parking, traffic flow, site size and location requirements and destination marketing). 3. Estimate the level or range of economic and fiscal .impacts generated by the proposed development. These are the objectives of the market and financial analysis described as the proposed "Seopo of Services." Scope of Services The work program designed to determine the sufficient scale of development and its support requirements is divided into two phases each of which is preceded by a work session and concluded with a written and verbal report. The purlxme of Phase I is to define the size of theater development which could be supported from the existing level of non-resident visitors to Temecula. Phase II will evaluate the reasonableness of, and requirements for, increasing the level of visitation to Temecula. The purpose of the three work sessions pre. eeding/following each phase is to budget the time (and recognize the necessity of) convening the Price Waterhouse economic study team with the developer/manager and client to: 1. Refine and clarify objectives and requirements of the Specific Plan, City, Developer and the proposed enterprise: the theater complex. 2. Communicate and evaluate study methodology, reliability and findings. 3. Insure that the timely progress and quality of the study, desired by all three participants (client, developer, and Price Waterhouse) is obtained. Phase III will estimate the fiscal (new taxes) and economic impacts generated for the city and county by the new development. The work plan, time and budget requirements and scheduled communications with the developer and client are outlined in the following sections. Mr. Ronald Bradley Page 4 Phase I: Theater Development Supported by Existin$ Visitor Market Following Work Session one, a series of analytical tasks will be undertaken to quantify the existing source of non-resident visitor market and visitor characteristics. Each visitor market segment will be quantified in terms of: Primary Market: Secondary Market: Tertiary Market: 1 to 11/2 hour drive time - "Day Trippen" 6 to 8 hour drive time - "Overnighters" Beyond 8 hour drive time - "Vacationers" Characteristics of visitors will be evaluated in terms of: Purpose or primary attraction: · Mode of transportation · Average length of stay · Seasonality · Average party size · Peak time characteristics · Spending per person · Adult - child mix special event, specialty retail, etc. Based on the assessment of visitor attendance levels to Temecula, we will evaluate the scale of theater development which can be supported. This evaluation will be defined in terms of: · Types of theaters · Number of seam/type of theater · Show content/style/quality The report will contain a description of the research findings and sufficient statistical data to support our major conclusions. Approximately one week following delivery of the Phase One report a work session will be conducted to further discuss existing visitor market characteristics and our Phase I findings. Phase II.' Market and Site Requirements to Sustain Proposed Theater Complex Each of the visitor market segments identified in Phase I will be analyzed to determine Temecula's ability to increase its annual level of visitation, improve market penetration rates and destination marketing program (budget) needed to capture increased Mr. Ronald Bradley Page 5 visitation. The viability of the proposed theater development complex will be evaluated in terms of its sustainability from increased visitation. Based on this evaluation, we will then describe absorption pace, phasing or buildout period for the proposed dev.elopment. The second part of the Phase II work program will include a description of the relevant physical requirements and characteristics (site location, site area, perking and circulation) which determine the marketability of the complex. Phase III.' Economic Impacts of the Entertainment Complex and Fiscal Impacts Resultin,, From "New" Spendin,, Annual or recurring economic impeets generated from operations of the proposed entertainment complex results from "new" dollars spent-by non-resident attendees. Additionally, spending by area residents which no longer "leaks" from the local economy due to events being held in Temeeula also represents "new" dollars. Combined, this new spending generates income and jobs for local area residents and new sales revenue for local businesses. In this task, we will estimate total "new" dollars resulting from the entertainment facility operations. Spending estimates will be based on financial operating data and average spending per attendee. Estimated "new" dollars will be used to determine total impects through the use of an econometric model which will calculate total impacts from subsequent spending "rounds" within Riverside County. Economic impects will be expressed in terms of changes in sales volume, income and number of jobs created. Data describing the economic impacts (total sales, jobs and income) will be utilized to measure the estimated fiscal impacts or increases in local taxes. The two to three largest tax revenue impects (e.g. hotel, sales, etc.) will be estimated. A final report describing all Phase I, Phase II and Phase III findings and methodology will be submitted one week prior to the final work session. Mr. Ronald Bradley Page 6 Price Waterhouse Qualifications and Experience Price Waterhouse began its U.S. operations in 1889 and today employs 10,000 professional and technical staff in 100 offices throughout the United States. Annual revenues for the U.S. Firm exceed $1.3 billion. The Price Waterhouse World Firm is located in 111 countries in 448 offices, with annual revenues in excess of $3.6 billion. The firm's goal is to serve clients whose primary needs are: · Credibility and objectivity · Client service · Wordwide reputation . Fortune 500 executives were recently asked to rank the Big 6 accounting firms in various categories. On a scale of 1-10, survey participants ranked Price Waterhouse highest in ethics; Price Waterhouse's score of 8.5 was the highest individual firm score in any category. Client service is the cornerstone of Price Waterhouse's overall business strategy. It is what we are all about and the way in which we distinguish ourselves among professional services firms. Our "Client Bill of Rights" reflects our commitment to superior client services. Our internal client service initiatives include programs to define, enhance, recognize and reward client service to ensure that our services are perceived as the best in the marketplace. As clients you have the right to: · Professional Excellence · Be Serviced by Professionals Who Understand Your Business · Proactive Advice and Creative Business Ideas · Independent Viewpoints and Perspectives · Effective Communication · Wide Range of Professionals Resources · Dependable Service · Service Anytime and Anyplace · State-of-the-Art Technology · Value-Added Service Mr. Ronald Bradley Page 7 Price Waterhouse is the sixth largest accounting tim, however, it leads the Fortune 100, Forbes 100 Largest Multinati0nals (29% market share) and Dow Jones Industrials (47% market share) in number of clients. Regarding combined sales of elieats, Price Waterhouse ranks first with $671 billion, representing 26% of total sales among the Fortune 500. No Big 6 firm is more strategically focused on and organized to serve multinational companies than Price Waterhouse. Price Waterhouse ensures the continuity of its reputation through its program of recruiting the Best and Brightat. The results of this program are borne out by objective measures. As noted in a survey published in the trade magazine, Professional Services Review, "a greater percentage of [PW] hires are the top students from the top schools than any other tim." The ~rm's achievements for quality work have been recognized by its peers. In 1990, Price Waterhouse achieved an unprecedented accomplishment: We were then and remain today the first and only national firm to have undergone a peer review resulting in an unqualified opinion and no letter of comment. Hailed as a "historic" event by a member of the profession's Public Oversight Board, this landmark accomplishment set up apart as the quality firm and demonstrated our commitment to the highest standards of professional excellence. In 1993, history repeated itself. As in 1990, our 1993 peer review, conducted by Deloitte & Touche, has once again resulted in a clean opinion with no letter of comment. It is particularly rewarding to have the ~rm's impressive performance acknowledged by our peers-not once, but twice. We take pride in this achievement, and, at the same time, recognize the need to intensify our efforts to ensure that we maintain this standing. Among the rim's clients are major multinational rims, including: * Alcan Aluminum · Amoco · Bausch and Lomb · Bristol Meyers · Chevron · Eastman Kodak · E.I. du Pont de Neroours · Exxon · F.W. Woolworth · Goodyoar Tire and Rubber · Hewlett-Packard · IBM · MCI Communications · Scott Paper · Seagram · Shell Oil · The Walt Disney Company · W.R. Grace Mr. Ronald Bradley Page 8 The Price Waterhome Development Advisory Group is devoted exclusively to the economic analysis of leisure facility development and operations and specializes in: Market Demand Utilization and Studies Development Strategies and Planning Management Operations and Analysis Financing and Funding Plans Expansion Planning and Building Programs Studies conducted by Price Waterhouse are unique because of our: · Track record of quality, credibility and objectivity · Staff experience in public assembly facility development and operations analysis · Continuous Project Director involvement Our professional suppert and participation in the leisure facilities industry includes: Stadium and Arena Managers Annual Report: The Development Advisory Group surveys all North American major league venues and summarizes results to report annually on occupancy, operating costs, attendance, operating trends and management issues. Amphitheater Report: The Development Advisory Group surveys all outdoor amphitheaters in major U.S. market areas and report summarized results annually on number of events, attendance, attendee spending, operating costs and management concerns. Convention Center Annual Report: We survey every primary convention center with over 100,000 square feet of exhibit space and approximately 50 smaller facilities throughout the United States and Canada. We report annual convention and trade show average occupancy, attendance, food and beverage per capita sales and effective rental rates. International Congress Center Annual Report: We have been selected to conduct the annual survey of member facilities for an international association of congress centers. This information is presented by geographical location and size of all major centers and includes attendance, food and beverage sales, occupancy, rental revenue and exhibition space occupancy.' Mr. Ronald Bradley Page 9 Data Base and Building Files: We maintain current records on building floor plans, financial data and city information for nearly every major facility in North America. Professional Conferences and Seminars: Our staff address five to ten professional associations annually on subjects associated with planning, development and operation of public assembly facilities. These groups include International City Managers Association, International Association of Auditorium Managers, International Convention Center Conference, Association Internationale des Palais de Congres, the Urban Land Institute, Japan National Tourist Organization and others. The active involvement of our staff in the activities of these organizations keeps us abreast of industry trends, facility development and related information. Publications and Research: The results of our research and analysis are frequently published in such journals as Urban Land; Convene; Amusement Business; Conferences, Exhibitions & Incentives; Tradeshow Week; Facility Manager and Practicing Planner. Staff members have also been quoted in numerous magazines and newspapers such as the New York Times, Wall Street Journal and Washington Post. David C. Petersen authored a book, published by the Urban Land Institute, entitled Convention Centers, Stadiums and Arenas. The activities and resources of the Development Advisory Group evidence our commitment to improved leisure facility development and operation. Firm Qualifications Daytona Beach, '"lake Part II" Daytona Beach, Florida Mr. George Mirabal President, Chamber of Commerce (904) 255-0981 Price Waterhouse staff analyzed tourist visitation trends in Daytona Beach and competitive markets. The analysis resulted in development of a strategic action program for potential tourist attraction development near Daytona Beach. Mr. Ronald Bradley Page 10 Grand Cypress Resort Orlando, Florida Price Waterhouse staff performed a series of market and financial analyses in conjunction with strategic planning for goff course facilities and golf oriented rental resort villas. Lexington Downtown Development Commission Lexington, Kentucky Mr. Thomas Minter President, Lexington Center (606) 233-4567 Analyzed development trends and potentials in downtown Lexington, including detailed evaluation of demand for commercial office, retail, food and beverage, hotel and miscellaneous urban uses in the downtown area. Projections served as basis for development of policies for the Lexington Downtown Development Commission and successful development of Lexington Center Corporation, a mixed-use retail, hotel and public assembly facility. City of Virginia Beach Virginia Beach, Virginia m. Mark Wawner Contract Administrator (804) 430-4567 Performed a market and financial assessment for a proposed 16,000-t8,000 seat amphitheater to attract summer concerts to the Virginia Beach area. The tasks in this study included: - Market area overview - Competitive and comparable facilities analysis - User surveys - Building program recommendations - Estimated utilization - Financial operations analysis - Development cost analysis - Economic and fiscal impact analysis - Alternative funding and development scenarios - Site analysis Mr. Ronald Bradley Page 11 Convention and Visitors Bureau Arlington, Texas Mr. Charles R. Kiefer Deputy City Manager (817) 459-6106 Examined advantages and disadvantages d alternative management structures for the City of Arlington. Identified and selected cities of comparable size with similar demographic and financial characteristics. Evaluated form of organization, board of directors composition and authority, funding characteristics and perceived advantages and disadvantages of the various organizational forms. Evaluated Arlington's CVB performance and recommended methods to improve operations. Tearrt ResBrrte$ Resumes for the following staff are included in the "Resume" section. · David C. Petersen, Managing Director · David Allsteadt, Practice Manager · Nancy L Vegas, Senior Consultant · Mike Bilodeau, Senior Consultant Time and Budget Requirements The proposed scope d services will be provided for a fixed fee d $75,000, plus travel expenses for the three planned work sessions. This fee will be payable according to the following schedule. $25,060 15,000 15,000 10,000 10,000 Due upon authorization to proceed * Due four weeks following authorization to proceed * Due upon delivery d Phase I draft report * Due upon delivery of Phase II draft report * Due upon delivery of Phase Ill draft report 875.000 * Total fee plus travel costs. * Plus travel costs Mr. Ronald Bradley Page 12 Engagement Terms Our services will not include ascertaining the legal and regulatory requirements applicable to the proposed project, including zoning, other state and local government regulations, permits and licenses. Further, no effort will be made to determine the possible effect on this project of future energy shortages or prosent or future federal, state or local legislation, including any bond restrictions, environmental or ecological matters, interpretations thereof or subsurface conditions. Our report will contain a statement to that effect. Estimates of future financial operations will be based on ~he proposed work program, estimates and assumptions from previous studies, information developed from supplemental research, knowledge of the industry and other sources, including certain information that you will provide. These sources of information and bases of significant estimates and assumptions will be stated in our report. Some assumptions inevitably will not materialize and unantieipated events and circumstances may occur; therefore, actual results achieved will vary from the estimates, and the variations may be material. Our report will contain a statement to that effect. Further, we will neither evaluate management's effectiveness nor be responsible for future marketing efforts and other management actions upon which actual results will depend, and we will so state in our report. The terms of this engagement will be such that we will have no obligation to revise the report to reflect events or conditions which occur subsequent to the date of the report. However, we will be available to discuss the necessity for revision in view of changes in the economic or market factors affecting the project. Our report will contain a statement to that effect. Report and analysis of future financial performance included therein, are intended for the information of the person or persons to whom they are addressed, solely for the purposes stated therein and should not be relied upon for any other purpose. Neither our report nor its contents, nor any reference to Price Waterhouse may be included or quoted in any offering circular or registration statement, prospectus, sales brochure, appraisal, loan or other agreement or documentation without prior written consent. Mr. Ronald Bradley Page 13 Price Waterhouse does not, as pan of its economic and financial analysis, perform an audit, review or examination (as defined by the AICPA) of any of the historical or future estimated financial information, and therefore does not express any opinion with regard to same. Authorization to Proceed If the proposed scope of services described in this letter meets with your approval, you may authorize us to proceed by signing one copy of this document and returning it to us. This proposal will remain in force for a period of sixty (60) days. Should you have questions, please contact David Petersen at (813) 222-5406. We appreciate the opportunity to present this proposal and look forward to workinl~ with you on this engagement. Very truly yours, David C. Petersen DCP/ksw Authorization to proceed: Name and Title Date DAVID C. PETERSEN Director David C. Petersen is the Director of the Sports and Convention Facilities Advisory Group for Price Waterhouse. This is a national and international practice providing assistance to local and state governments, authorities, franchise owners, corporations end financial institutions. Services provided include: Market Demand end Utilization Studies Development Strategies end Planning Finencing end Funding Plans Menagement and Operations Analysis Expansion Plenning end Building Program Economic Impact Analysis Upon receiving a B.A. degree, with honors in economics from San Jose State College, Mr. Petersen provided consulting services in municipal financial planning, central city revitalization strategies end sports end convention facilities development end operations. Mr. Petersen's assignments have included studies for existing and proposed centers such es: · New Orleans Superdome · Jacob Javits Convention Center (New York City) · RFK 'Redskins' Stadium (Washington) · Hynes Convention Center (Boston) · Georgia Dome Stadium (Atlanta) · Washington State Convention Ctr. (Seretie) · Rupp Arena (Lexington, KY) · Bradley Arena (Milwaukee) · Chicago 'White Sox' Stadium · Baltimore 'Orioles' Stadium · San Diego Convention Center · Ocean Center (Daytona Beach) · Rose Bowl Stadium · N~-~qu Coliseum (Arena) New York · Boston Gardens Arena · Milwaukee 'Brewers" Stadium · Sen Frandsco 'Giants' Stadium · Anaheim Arena (California) · Phoenix 'Suns" An1:}hitheater Arena · Miami Beach Converttion Center · Indienapolis Convention Center and Hoosier Dome · St. Louis Convention Center, Auditorium and Dome Stadium · Atlentic City Convention Center Mr. Petersen has also served clients in Italy, Japan, Singapore, United Kingdom, Curacao and the Philippines. Mr. Petersen's articles have been published in Conferences Exhibitions & Incentives International, Amusement Business, Convene, Practicing Planner, Urban Land and Tradeshow Week. He is the author of the book, Convention Centers, Stadiums, and Arenas, published by the Urban Land Institute. He has addressed the International City Managers Association, Japanese National Tourist Organization, International Convention Center Conference, Urban Land Institute, International Associmion of Auditorium Managers, Stadium Menager Annual Seminar, Society of American Business Editors and Writers, Association Internationale des Paiais de Congres and the annual Meeting World Conference. In 1989, he was admitted as full member of the Urban Land Institute. l 'ice Haterhouse MICHAEL C. BILODEAU Senior Consultant Michael C. Bilodeau's background includes public assembly facility analysis and sports facility operations. His professional experience includes assignments in market and financial analysis lor a diverse group of public and private clients. Mr. Bilodeau has been involved in a variety of research projects throughout the United States, including convention/exhibition, entertainment and sporting facilities. Recent projects on which he has sewed as the primary consultant include: Capital Centre (Land0ver, Maryland) - Appraisal evaluation of NBA/NHL arena to determine facility's market value. · Georgia Dome (Atlanta, Georgia) - Market and financial evaluation for 70, O(X) seat NFL dome stadium. · Olympic Palace (San Juan, Puerto Rico) - Markat and financial evaluation for proposed Olympic arena, Rose Bowl (Pasadena, CalHornia) - Market evaluation and finandal analysis associated with development of premium seating areas (sky boxes and dub seats) at Rose Bowl Stadium. Joe Robbie Stadium (Miami, Florida) - Valuation of Joe Robhie Stadium. Clienrs objective was to determine facility's incremental value following Major League Baseball expansion. Rangers Stadium (Arlington, Texas) - Valuation of new Arlington Stadium and Texas Rangers to determine the incremental value of the baseball franchise following the team's relocation to their new stadium. Lynn, Massachusetts - Analysis of market support. financial evaluation, economic and fiscal impact analysis and development funding plan for proposed New England Patriots' dome stadium. Lubbock, Texas - Analysis of market support, financial evaluation and economic impact analysis associated with development of proposed Coliseum and Lubbock CMc Center expansion. Louisiana Superdome (Now Orleans, Louisiana) - Analysis of additional exhibitioWconvention demand to determine future development opportunities for a new exhibition facility adjacent to the Superdome. San Bernardioe, California - Market suppert evaluation and estimate of utilization for a new 18,000- seat outdoor amphitheater. Spokane, Washington - Market evaluation, financial analysis, site selection and economic impact evaluation for a proposed arena. Pensacola, Fbrida - Development planning and market evaluation for a proposed Minor League Baseball stadium. Mr. Bilodeau received a Bachelor's degree, with honors in finance, from Northeast Louisiana University, and a Master of Arts degree in sport administration from Ohio State University. Price Ifizterhoust, e DAVID P. ALLSTEADT Manager David AIIsteadt joined Price Waterhouse in 1987 after completing his CPA examination. He has six years of experience dealing primarily with financial services and real estate. Mr. AIIsteadt joined the Sports and Convention Facilities Advisory Group in 1993. His recent projects as Practice Manager include: Starelord, Connecticul - Evaluation of developer prepared market analysis and incremental revenues and taxes for proposed super-regional shopping center expansion. · Central Connectice - Analysis of financial and operating estimates for music theater. Montgomery County, Maryland - Market evaluation, financial analysis, site selection, building program evaluation and economic impact for proposed high technology convention center. Waterbury, Connecticut - Analysis of developer prepared market analysis and incremental revenues and taxes for proposed new super-regional shopping center. Hartford, Connecticut - Evaluation of developer prepared financial and operating estimates for a downtown amphitheater. Boston, Massachusetts - Analysis of alternative development options of multi-purpose center including, dedicated exhibit space and integral fixed seating space. · Saint Paul, Minnesota- Analysis of competitive developer proposals for a riverfront amphitheater. Spokane, Washington - Market evaluation, financial analysis, and economic impact of proposed convention center expansion. · Mexico City, Mexico - Competitive facilities analysis for proposed convention center near the airport. First Florida Banks (FFB) - Financial audits concerning credit review, including evaluating adequacy of allowance for loan losses. Loans reviewed included real estate related loans: single-family, multi-family, and commercial property. Walter Industries, Inc. -Invoivemant in three collateralized mortgage obligation financing deals for the Homebuilding Group. The Homebuilding Group builds and finances approximately 5,000 single-family units per year. Resolution Trust Corporation - Quality Control review of Due Diligence Contractors involved in a RTC Accelerated Resolution Program project. Settlement Jackets account balances. Due diligence of undeveloped and partially developed land loans for inclusion in securitized land fund pools. · Criterion Development Corporation - Preparation of prospective financial information for limited partnerships involved in bond refinancing related to low income housing apartment complexes. Mr. AIIsteadt received a Bachelor of Science degree in Accounting from the University of South Florida. He is a member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and of the Florida Institute of Certified Public Accountants. NANCY L. VEGAS Senior Consultant Nancy Vegas' background includes hotel and convention center analysis and operations. Her professional experience includes markel, financial and economio impact analysis and building program recommendations for several IxXal and convention oemer development projects. Ms. Vegas has been involved in several research assignments monitoring holel room occupancy and average room rates in various hotel markets throughout the United Sties. She also senms as project director for the Price Waterhouse Convention Center Annual Report surveys. Descriptions of projects on which she served as prirnaW consultam include: Boston, Mm0huselt$ - Analysis of alternmive exhibition space expansion options. Alternative development options included expansion of Hynes Convention Center, development of an exhibition facility in South Boston, or both. Atlants, Georgia - Market, financial and economic impact analysis for proposed expansion of Georgia World Congress Cemer. Houslon, Tens - Analysis of the effect of site location on the marketability of a proposed headquarters hotel for the George R. Brown Convention Center. San Diego, CalUomin - Markel, financiaJ and economic impact analysis for proposed San Diego Convention Canter expansion. Opportunities to improve the existing building program were identified. Detroil, Michigan - Estimate of room night demand from Cobo Conference and Exposition Center in downtown Detroit. Analtalm, California - Business plan which estirnmed Anaheim Convention Centers lutum space requirements and off-site facilities assodated with building expansion. Brownnille, Texas - Markel and financial analysis of a proposed multi-purpose building to accommodate conventions, trade shows, spectator events, and local functions. · Yuma, Arizona - Markel analysis for the expansion of Yuma's community 'went' center. · El Paso, Texas - Analysis of markel demand to delermine future markel support for a headquarters hotel located adjacent to El Paso Convention Center. Performing Arts Pavilions - Market and financial analysis for fifteen to twenty proposed pedorming arts pavilions. United Slate - Researched how five of the most recently developed convention center headquarter hotels were financed, and effect of these hotels on convention center occupancy and citywide room night demand. New Odeanl, Louisiana - Site, market and financial analysis for a proposed lodging property to be located near a proposed exhibit hall adjacent to the Superdome. Recommended lodging property type to best suit area demand. Orlando, Florida - Markel and financial analysis for proposed upscale resort and conference center. Sarasot'a, Florida - Analysis ot market demand associated with development of beach-front resort hotel property. Prior to joining Price Waterhome, Ms. Veges served in sales and marketing positions with Hilton Internmional Hotel's national sales offices in New York and Minneapolis. Ms. Vegas received a Bachelor of Science degree in hotel administration from Cornell University. l~ict, l J~tt,r'htm.~'e e PRICE WATERHOUSE DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY SERVICES -'-' The Price Waterhouse DevelopmeM Advisory Services is devoted exclusively to the economic analysis of public assembly facility development and operations and specializes in: · Market Demand end Utilization Studies · Development Strategies and Planning · Management Operations and Analysis · Financing and Funding Plens · Expansion Plenning end Building Programs · ' Site Evaluation and Runking · Facility Valuations · Acquisition 'Due Diligence' Studies conducted by Price Waterhouse are unique because of our: · Track record of qlality, credib|lity and oNecUvny · Extensive experience in public assembly facility development and operntioos analysis · Continuous project director involvement Our professional support end participation in the assembly and meeting facilities industry includes: · Annual Arena and Stadium Managers' Reped - Price Waterhouse surveys all North American major league venues and summarizes the results to report annually on occupancy, operating costs, attendance, operating trends and management issues. · Diversity d Experience for Seccesdul Clients - Our staff has provided economic and financial planning services to owners of convention centers, arenas, domed stadiums, amphitheaters, motor speedways, horse racetracks, ice arenas and minor league stadiums. A sample of the facilities we have assisted with planning or expansion include the Georgia Dome in Atlanta, Baltimore Orioles Stadium, White Sox Stadium, the Rose Bowl, the Superdome, Rupp Arena in Lexington (KY), American West Arena in Phoenix, and Ocean Center in Daytona Beach. · Decades ol Industry Experience - Price Waterhouse has been associated with the entertainment and sports industries for over 60 years. Our clients include 18 professional sports franchises representing Major League Baseball, the National Football League, National Basketball Association and National Hockey League. The firm is also actively involved in serving event producers, minor league team owners, facility management companies, motor speedways, yachting industry and golf associations. · International Congress Center Annual Repefl - Price Waterhouse has been selected to conduct the annual survey of member facilities for an international association of congress centers. This information is presented by geographical location and size of all major centers and includes attendance, food and beverage sales, occupancy, rental revenue and exhibition space occupancy. · Convention Center Anneal Report - Price Waterhouse surveys every primary convention center with over 100,000 square feet of exhibit space and approximately 50 smaller facilities throughout the United States and Canada. We report ennual convention and trade show average occupancy, attendance, food and beverage per capita sales and effective rental rates. · Data Base and Building Files - We maintain current records on building floor plans, financial data and city information for many major facilities in North America. · Predictin Attendance Model - We have developed a model to estimate attendance for sports franchises new to a metro area. The model is based on key measures of a community's Iocational characteristics, proposed team performance and team quality. The model has been tested for major league football, basebell, hockey, basketball and soccer. · Prdessional Conferences and Seminars - Our staff address five to ten professional associations ennually on subjects associated with planning, development end operation of public assembly facilities. These groups include the Annual Stadium Managers Seminar, International City Manager Association's Sports & Events Management Conference, International Association of Auditorium Managers, International Convention Center Conference, Association Internationale des Palate de Congres, the Urban Land Institute's Sports Facilities Seminar, Japen National Tourist Organization and others. The active involvement of our staff in the activities of these organizations keeps us abreast of industry trends, facility development and related information. · Publications and Research - The results of our research and analysis are frequently published in such journals as Facility Manager; Conferences, Exhibitions & Incentives; Urban Land; Amusement Business; Convene; Practicing Planner and Tradeshow Week. Staff members have also been quoted in numerous magazines end newspapers such as the New York Times, Waft Street Journal end Washington Post. David C. Petersen authored a book, published by the Urban Land Institute, entitled Convention Centers, Stadiums and Arenas. The activities and resources of the Sports, Convention, and Entertalnmant Facilities Advisory Group evidence our commitment to improved spectator sports, entertainment end assembly facility development and operation. Thinking About a Downtown Stadium for Baltimore · Dsvid C. Pek., ~ ~ When the owner of the Baltimore Orioles baseball team announced in 1984 that he would not renew his lease for Memorial Stadium. the business community and gov- ernmental leaders responded with a focused program of action un- equaled in any other American city in the same circumstances. A plan for a new' stadium was quick- 1~ proposed by the Downtown Task Force and subsequently taken up for further study and consideration by a state-level com- mission. This commission's find- ings and recommend.ations led the Man'land State Legislature to form the Maryland Stadium Au- thority with funding to build not only a new baseball park but a new football stadium as well. Baltimore. having already lost one major league team. the NFL Colts. knew too well the damage to the local economy and civic pride that the loss of the Orioles would bring. Unlike "glamour" cities like New York and San Francisco. Baltimore relies on pro sports teams for national recogni- tion. publicliT,'. and image. Since 1959. Baltimore civic and business leaders have directed an urban re- newal and central city revitaliza- tion program that has progressed. virtually uninterrupted. under the administrations of six different mayors. The city that built Charles Center and Inner Harbor was not about to lose its "major league" status. On April 26. 1988. ULI's Balti- more District Council sponsored a program focusing on the experi- ences of other cities with down- town stadiums as well as on Bahi- more's plan for a new bailpark. Riverfront Stadium in Cincin- nati, As explained by Nell Surber, director of economic development for the city of Cincinnati, this 20- year-old structure. home to the NFL Bengals and the Cincinnati Reds. sits between the Ohio River and downtown. A pedestrian walkway over Interstate Highway 71 connects the stadium to the CBD. A stadium typicalP,' depends on automobile transportation to de- liver its fans on game day. With few exceptions {for example. at New York's Yankee StadiumL sea- son ticket holders are not likely users of public transportation. Nor can most public transporta- tion systems deliver 60,000 to 70,000 fans to a stadium comfort- ably and safely. Consequently. a fan-to-car ratio of 3:1 requires parking for 3,000 to 4.000 cars for an average major league baseball team and as many as 20,000 park- ing spaces for an NFL team. Be- cause downtown Cincinnati al- ready offered thousands of parking spaces in ganges and off- street lots (available for night and weekend games), the site area re- quired for the stadium was re- duced by over 100 acres. Thus, re- duced parking requirements saved money for the city, and the flow of fans through the CBD brought economic benefits. Traditionally, the high cost of parking Ms been a deterrent to downtown office development in Cincinnati. Riverfront Stadium developed 4,500 parking spaces on site. which downtown workers can use for $20 per month. (CBD monthly parking rates can reach $100.) Multiuse stadium parking is part of the citv's continuing effort to strengthen the CBD. Most NFL season ticket holders. as has been well documented. are upper-middle-income subur- banires. Bengals games draw fans into downtown on weekends. fans who tend to use its tirst-class retail facilities and five-star restaurants. The Reds baseball games attract fans from a five-state area, and thus a substantial number of over- night visitors who stay in the citv's nearby first-class hotels. Sun'evs have documented the importance of sports events at Riverfront Sta- dium to CBD retail sales as well. A 17,500-seat arena. the · 'Coliseum," now sits adjacent to the stadium. h shares the sta- dium's parking facilities and also relies on CBD parking facilities. An agreement between the man- agement of the Coliseum and Riv- erfront Stadium prohibits the scheduling of simultaneous activi- ties at both locales to avoid over- burdening parking capacity. Riverfront Stadium was fi- nanced through an agreement be- tween the city, which owned the land, and Hamilton County, which possessed the bonding ca- pacity that the city was lacking. Such city/county coo ration is often sought but sel~reomn achieved. New 0rlemms Superdome. Ed Nebel, a professor of hotel/restau- rant/tourism studies at the Uni- versity of New Orleans, told the ULI audience that a 300 percent construction overrun was just the beginning of the bad news for the Superdome. The New Orleans downtown area sprawls in com- September 88 21 panson to Cincinnati. Although downtown office worke/'s do use the 5.000 parking spaces available at the Superdome site, downtown and tourist-oriented French Quarter retailers do not benefit to the same extent as their counter- pans in Cincinnati. The initial operating plan and economic justification for the Su- perdome were predicated on a major league baseball team mak- ing its home there. This never happened. Cincinnatrs Riverfront Stadium hosts 80 baseball games each year that New Orleans does not enjoy. Also. "the Dome" was expected to function as a conven- tion center. but. like baseball. this function never materialized. (In 1984. a new convention center was built several blocks awav.i Op- erating deficits in the early years of stadium operations exceeded several million dollars annually. Since 1978. a private management company has achieved significant reductions in operating costs. Most recenth', the Dome was forced to enter into a "sweetheart" contract with the NFL Saints to retain the team. After losing an NBA franchise to Salt Lake City. New Orleans was anxious to keep its one remaining major league tenant. Predevelopment market studies proved to be as misleading as postdevelopment economic ira- pact studies were disappointing. Someday. the market mav support more teams. Someday. the CBD may grow closer to the stadium. It is unlikely. however. that this sta- dium will ever successfully double as a convention center. It is also unlikely that its annual debt ser- vice costs and operating expenses will ever be offset by property tax revenues attributable to the sta- dium's positive effect on property values or by direct stadium income. Indianapolis Hoosierdome. Dean Phillips, executive director and general manager of the Indi- anapolis Convention Center and Hoosierdome. reported that this domed stadium was built as an in- tegral part of the convention cen- ter. The stadium playing surface provides a 150.000-square-foot extension to the exhibition hall for major trade and consumer . shows. Financing for the stadium was provided through a $:30 mil- lion grant from the Eli Lilly Foun- dation. as well as through an addi- tional S35 million from a municipal bond sale. ¢The bonds are to be repaid from a I percent tax on food and beverages sold in. restaurants and other commercial establishments.) Building a stadium without a tenant was a high-risk venture. but luckily Indianapolis was able to attract the NFL Colts to the city The economic jumificmioa for the New Orleans Superdome was predicmed on · major league baM4all team making iU home ,here, something that never happened. by the time the stadium opened. Like the Superdome. the Hoosier- dome has no major league base- ball team. Unlike the Superdome. it enjoys the economic advantages of dual use as convention space. The stadium and convention cen- ter share management. staff. and parking facilities. This factor. to- gether with grant financing. keeps the Hoosierdome's debt service and operating costs substantiall~ below those for the Superdome. The complex has spawned major projects on nearby parcels. and has helped make Indianapolis a major center for amateur and professional sports. giving it na- tional stature. Without its convention center, special sports activities. the sierdome probably would not at- tract much development to tts surroundings. Twenty events a vear--I 0 pro football games and i 0 concerts--will not provide suf- ficient support for restaurants. shops. and the like. These estab- lishments need market support from a surrounding office and resident population. Stadium events are simply. though deft- nitely. a market enhancement. Baltimore's Thinldng As Herb Belgrad. chairman ot the Maryland Stadium Authority. described the situation. foilowm.~ the announcement by Orioles owner and famed attorney. the late Edward Bennett Willtams. that he would not renew the team's lease at Memorial Stadium. the citv's mayor. Donald Schaef- fer. charged the Downtown Task Force with the responsibility for identifying and evaluating the city's options. This task force. in turn. retained stadium architects Hellmuth. Obata and Kassabaum (HOK) and sports facility econom- ic consultants Laventhol & Hor- wath (L&H). During the course of its study. the HOK/L&H team evaluated the costs and benefits of renovating Memorial Stadium venus building a new stadium-- open or enclosed. single- or multi- 22 September 88 / _TIT< purpose tbasebail and football combinedl. It Investigated and ranked manx alternative she loca- tions according to their accessibili- Ix. available site area. site acquisi- tion issues. the economic impact ot stadium operations on city and state finances. available parking. and attendance. Several of these sites were near the Inner Harbor and CBD. while others were near the Baltimore-~,Vashington Inter- nattcmal Airport tBWI I and closer to the Washinl~ton. D.C.. area. The team discovered an inter- esting economic trade-off. Ciearh. the economic,fiscal benefits to the state would be greater were the stadium located closer to the XVashington. D.(i.. metropolitan area. where increased attendance trom out-ol-state residents would generate higher "nel next"' spend- in~ within the state. But such a catam x~ould erode the team's his- toric tan base. which lived in lhe citx ot Bahimore. Furthermore. the D.(:.'Northern Virginia tan base would he weakened ~ere VCashington. D.(2.. to obtain a ma- ior league tranchise of its own. Tratfit als~ would be a tou~h sue at sites hK'aled in the Bahi- nlore-D.( ]. t.rridor. A Male ct~mmlssi~nI ajso illvestj- gated sites th,ser ~ the ~A'ashitlg- ~,m. I).(;.. area. bin ultimately the ',telIt' srlec'led the site retonl- mended bx the HC)K L&H slud~ al (~amden Yards adjacent to the Belhimore CBD. ~.Vithin half a mile ot this she there are two Bal- timore subwax stops. 20 bus stops. maior lourist hotels. the ]0.(lOll- seat Civic Cenler. the Bahimore Convention Center. and 12.000 off-street parking spaces. The state has proposed financ- ing the stadium with proceeds from a series of instant lotteries (the first two sports-themed loi- reties have raised $16 million ). tax increment funds. and net revenues from the stadium's operation. According to Randall Evans. who represented the state's De- partment of Communitx' and Eco- nomic Development. the issues are simple: taxes and jobs. Not all a stadium's benefits are direct. or directIx obvious. One key value it bnngs ts in the national media coverage provided b~' major league sports..Another is that it enhances the quality of life need- ed to attract residents and busi- nesses to Baltimore. The president of Charles Cen- ter-Inner Harbor Management. Inc.. Albert Copp. thinks the sta- dium project will help perpetuate the momentum of downtown re- development. As the few remain- ing parcels for office buildings and hotels have had to wait for further growth in the market for their development. interest in the Inner Harbor area has begun to wane. Construction of the stadium will enhance the area's image as the "place to be." The proposed Oriole stadium is not without its detractors. The · 'opl:x~sttRm's" leading spokesman. Robert J..Stohe. president of the .Southwest Bahinlore Communitx Council. served as a panelist at the L'LI District Council meeting. Representin.~ the neightx~rh~nd adiacent Io the proposed stadium stle. the community council has not sought Io prevent the devel- opment on Camden Yards. but has asked the citx and state to mit- tgale the potential negative effects of the stadium on its neighlx~r- h~n~d. Such negative impacts m- elude the delax in construction of two badIx' needed bridges: traffic congestion on hn:al streets: the loss of a high school in the area from a decline in the school-age resident population: and sanita- tion problems. Stohe's nonob- structionist approach could be of great value to the stadium project. when one considers the multi- million dollar costs from delays caused by opposition to similar projects ~n numerous other cities. The city and state would be well- advised to be responsive to the council's concerns. The Orioles. as represented by their vice president. Lawrence Lucchino. also favor downtown for a stadium location. In the spir- it of baseball tradition. says Luc- chino. the game is intended to be played after work. and. therefore. ns appropriate venue is down- town. He reminded the audience of the popularity of teams in other downtown facilities such as Boston's Fenway Park. Detrott's Tiger Stadium. and Cincinnati's Riverfront Stadium. Only 15 per- cent of Orioles fans purchase tick- ets in advance. A downtown loca- tion facilitates "walk-up" business. the Orioles's bread and butter. It also will attract tourists to games. The Orioles prefer a single- purpose stadium. which provides better service for the team. better sight lines for baseball. and "personality" architecture for the sport. Not all stadiums achieve the ex- pectations of their owners. The experiences of various downtown stadiums clarifv some of the devel- opment issues. Among the lessons one max' draw from the examples of Cincinnati. New Orleans. and Indianapolis are the following: CBD parking facilities can be an important element in a stadium's feasibility. Conversely. parking provided on a close-in stadium site can support the office market in a downtown with parking ton- straints. A baseball team plays many home games a year. These attract enough'local residents to suppon downtown restaurants and retail sales. Out-of-town fans can support hotel markets. A downtown Location is a kev deter- minant of the stadium's overall impact on the downtown econo- my. And finally. a stadium's meth- od of financing often determines how favorably the cost/benefit equation works out. · David C. Petersen is the Director of the Sports & Convention Facilities Advisory Group for Price Waterhouse. He has written a book on the development of convention centers, stadiums, and arenas published by ULI. _TIT-.'r~7,5,' 7_~.7.5,_'5 / September 88 2S Economic and Tax Benefits Created by Congress Centers: Needs and Methods for Measurement Prepared for Conl~res des Congres by Price Waterhouse Congress Center Group 2 December 1992 Paris, France Economic benefits generated by attenclees to eong=~ events hav~ been reeog~ged by loeal, provincial and national' governments f~r several decades. The eonferenee eontera and exhibition halls which began. as private enterprise/for-profit ventures, eventually hoesme publicly owned and heavily subsidized as cities competed against each other by offering below-nmrket rents and other eoncessiotm. Congress center attendees include: Delegates and mm of trade or pmfeuional associations and accompanying pemns Association management Exhibitera Exhibition service eontraetora Others nttraeted by congress events - media, related activities, meetings in city The total return or profit from this public investment and operating subsidy is seldom measured because the traditional accounting systems measure only the internal eesh flow of the eongress center. Economic benefits, or external revenues, are received by the eommunity in the form of: · Added jobs and payrolls · New sales · Increased taxes It is .indeed a great mystery how govcssua~ssts make rational decisions to build, operate, expand, improve or promote their eo~ center when they ate unable to measure the results of their investments] What are the most taxable benefits we can measure? Certainly these would include expenditute. s made by eongess attendees before, during and after the eongess event (pre- and post-congress touring), costs of/expenditures for exhibit move in/set up and tear down/move out, event show days and sales by '~ocal" goods and service providera generated by the trade show or conference. Diagrammatically, the sotwzes of the expenditures during the event period could be shown: Tvlm ld Expenditure Attendee and 'aecoml~_nylag permr Exhibiton Assoolation~how MIe-egL-I--I (on site) Exhibition Service Contram (stand erectors) Media/Related Events, Etc. Pre-/Poe-Evem X X Similarly, we can identify the major type of expenditux~s. Evmtt PeriOd Mm In/Old Set-up/Tear Down Cold/Show X X X X X These include hotel-related expenditures; mores, restaurants, hospitality suites and related events (meetings, bw. quets, et~.); restaurants outside the hotel and ~etail shops. These sales at hotels, retail shol~ and mtaurants comprise 87% of the total expenditures generated by a congress. Com&:l:on, rrrade Show Odegate f peneltLr,ll - 1991 3.9~ Loci Tfare;xxtation 4.3% Real Shim 8.2% 5,2% Other Fillmills 11.4% Hold Fiemamas 11.0% 2 How go Measure These Revenues: Mahodolofy The economic benefit analysis or methodology can be. described in four tasks. I. Defining the Area or "Universe" of Impact: Who Benefits? Where Does the Spending Occur? II. IH. Attendee Spending Survey: Measm'ing Direct Sales and Incom~ Spending by Non-attendees: Measurin~ Indirect or Induced Sales and Income Estimatin~ Accuracy of Analysis: Credibility and Reliabih'ty Each of these tasks will be described to explain how the benefits or "external revenues" generated by the congx?.ss center can be measured. /. Defining ghe Area or "Univene" of Impa~' Who Bernflu? Where Does ghe Spending Occur? Defining the beneficiary may seem simplistic or self-evident, however, many economic benefit studies are conducted without a clear definition or description of the area or persons receiving the benefits of the congt~__s center's operation. Normally this area is determined by identifying the jurisdiction which is paying the eosts or sul~idy of the center. Naturally, if the purpose of the study is to determine the total return on investment, then the benefits should include the revenues created for or within the jurisdiction which is paying the costs: city, province or state. Identification of the area or universe of economic impact will, in turn, define who is "resident" and "non-resident" and the magnitude of indirect or induced benefits, sometimes referred to as the "multiplier effect." There are compelling reasons for including other areas in the analysis, in addition to the jurisdiction of the facility owner. For example, many centers in the United States have obtained financial support from a larger jurisdiction, such as the state, after it was demonstrated the state received comparable, or more often, much larger tax revenues from congres center events than the jurisdiction paying for the operations of the eongx-ess center. Consequently, some studies include economic benefits for city and state (especially for states which have only one major city, such as Georgia, Massachusetts, Illinois and others). 3 II. Attendee Spending Survey: Measuring Dirs:s Salss and Iru:om~ The International Association of Convention and Visitor Bureaus (IACVB) has developed the most widely used data for measurin~ delegate spending in North America. Their procedure includes: Selection of a representative range or cross-section of cities Identification'of "typical"' convention evens for ceeh center Use of stan~ qllestions to cellcot spending information for eaoh major ea~ of attendee ... m Delegate and aceompsaying persons Exhibitor Exhibition service contractor On-site association or show management Working in cooperation with association sad show managers as well as facility managers, each 8roup is surveyed and appropriate call-back procedures are followed to msxlml-e the response rate Data collected is then tabulated to show total spending by day and by event, the average lenS~h of stay, expenditures by type of event and type of expenditure There is not a "scientific approach" or sophisticated methodology for this exercise._ The basis for selection of cities and events may be questioned as regards their "representativehess," however, this is the best information available. The more representative the cross-section of cities and events sampled and the higher the response ram, the more statistically reliable the results will be. 4 INSTRUCTIONS: Please ampaim I)ue~f~.n~ 1 through 7 by dthor ebNking the liplkOik~ill box(B) or wdUng the amor in the space provided. Round all dollar iJkplndP_ res to file nearest dollar and mar I '0' for andl netegofy whore them were no expenditem. 1. Did yoe trmml to this eonvant~oll alone? YES NO If no, indicate the number of people you traveiM with, :_Jlud:ng yoululL Family/Friends Bailme JJllo(iatel OO0 001 OO~ 003 004 2. Do you redde within the U.S.? YES NO If YES, ladleale which state What was IM paltory mode ot Iranzpoftmmn ufad by yov and lIE ...B,_.Mf8 ot your Irevei parly Io lhi~ conk&.Eon? Check one 'mode. · t mrtm (web urr/rlt]) ~' Train eel 3 Be ON 4 Palyam eorAmek/~a:maUo~al vddele 5 OtMf Ha many nigids dM you and lIE ramIres of your, Irmml party reamin lIE ally whom this convL. Uon was - held? Indicate bldow lhe Iotal amount yov and rambee el your Ixlmonel Irmmi party spent on lie Iolkrddng item while in lie ally ere lie nenvanlm m bald. Do nix indnde banapodalion Io and from rite convanUoa ally or eoal&.l~on raglil&i[H lanL (DO nol include bmbeu Hold room and leldanlab Hold rettaumnls OIMr retmoram Hoqdailly abe AdmMion lees at altraclions/mumanm Thmea/wmpmleenolm Reer, eil~onel anlMIim (gmmm tnet, etc.) SIC:.::eelng HiM elm S~m even~ Tax~iui mmaVote led ban~llta 6u and ado :e~ce o. m 11o 111 118 114 11s 11. 117 118 11l in 1~1 5 This is what the results look like. Convention Delegate Trade Show Delegate Dmgae Expendimres Exhibtm Expenditure 8pending (~v,w, kiwd per Delegate Day - 1991 151.94 15.94 167.88 151.94 15.94 80.37 5.60 Baldan ol DdegMe EvTplinditmM Hole Room and Incidentals 77.23 Hole Restaurants 16.65 Other Restaurants 17.31 Hospitality Suites 7.87 Entertainment 7.88 Refail Sto~es 12.43 Local Transportalic, n 6.56 Other 6.01 TOTAL 151.94 If one of your cities was selected to be part d the survey or if you conducted your own survey, you would then have recent data about your center. However, if you are using IACVB 'avera{]es,' or data prepared for some other center, to measure economic benefits f~}r your center, certain adjustments or corrections must be made. Cost Index, Within North Amerien, the Corporate Travel Index is used to equate the city/center expenditures being measured to the "average" for the eight cities in the IACVB survey. This index is prepared for 1 O0 cities and roeash hotel room emits,. restaurant meals end other travel related emits. Intentional cities travel emits are measured end "indexed*' using the U.S. State Department Travel Per Diem Allowances for 732 cities. 6 Mm Per Loution Dim RIll Birmingham 220 London 236 New York City 151 Nice 172 Osnabrueck 130 Paris 226 Rome 263 Tokyo 290 lnfiatiom The surveys conducted by IACVB are conducted every three to five years. Adjustments utillsin6 the conauner price index would be necesmuy for any estimate since the data are over one year old before the survey is ever published. Currency Conversiom Centers located outside countries Where surveys are taken my utilize this data if currency conversion is made for the appropriate (usually mid year or ave~ for the year). Ratio of Non-resident Attendms Major e~ centers located in '*world capitol cities*' CLondon, Paris, Berlin, etc.) will attract more non-resident attenclees than a smaller, provincial city. Non-residents are defined as attendees who reside outside the region that benefits from eemunie impact. Resident spending-should net be ineluded in estimates of congress eenter benefits bocause it is mumed a resident would spend this money somewhere else in the local economy ff he/she did not attend the ~ eYent. This point my be argued over the residents' propensity to attend a emtgress outside the jurisdietion if the local event were not betd. However, in nearly all situations, the economists will recognize the eongress event changes neither the residents'disposable income nor their propetmity to spend. Ratio of Oeempied Hotel Room to Atteprims Mat events have a good record of the number of rooms occupied relative to their attencln,tce. These ratios should be used for each apeeric event rother than using an "average" ratio for all events. Consider room night pick-up repo~s, understanding that a certain percentage of attendecru book outside the room block, as well as statistics from show ~. Average Length of Says This is identical to the pr~ issue. Each event has its own length of show and move in/move out requirements. These humben should be used for each event in the survey to derive the average for the destination or eenter rather than using an average for the industry. 7 Retail and Restaurant Demity Adjummentt The multitude of unique specialty shops, high-fashion retail stores and gourmet restaurants available in cities like Paris or New York encourages congress attendees to plan shopping trip and really "research" which rutaurants they will enjoy during their amy. Family members and friends ate more likely to accompany delegates to the congress destination if they expect extmordinax7 shopping and dining opportunities and attractions. Expenditur~ per delegate is much higher in these cities than in cities with few (or no) retail shopping districts or high quality restaurants convenient to the delegates. For e-,,,nl}le, average retail expenditur~ for delegates to City A are S48 compared to average retail expenditures of S 120 per delegate attending a con~'ess in City B. This is also irdlueneed by the affluence of the attendees, for example attenrlees to a medical conference as compared m a teaeher's conference. Although there is no index for availability or eoneentrations of Free which enjoy an extmo~inary zz-'lmstation for either end of the speemun: excellent to poor, high or low. Granted, such an adjustment could not be very precise. Nevertheless, using "average" expenditures in extraordinary destinations would lead m a larger error of over- or under-estimating spending. After these correctiota are completed, the avera~ expenditure per delegate or attendee my be substantially higher or lower than the averaBe calculated by the IACVB for the cities participating in the st recent survey. IlL Memuring In&a:d or Indireu Rwsma: Spmding by Nma-otmad, s~ Each purchase by the emtSzeu attendee tct~csea~ts a sale by the hotel, restaurant or retail shop owner. The proeeechs frotn each sale are respent for merchandise, payrolls or services required to sustain the business. These second and subsequent rounds of indirect or induced spending would not occur if the tirst expenditure or direct spending was not made by the e0ngress center attendee. The numtx~r of spendinf~ rounds, or numkx~r of times each purchase-sale is respent in the "local" economy, before it "leaks out," is usually determined by the size and diversity of the economy. C, enerally speaking, a nation or region would have n higher number of spending rounds than a snudl city. The average nund0er of total spending rounds for each economic unit is referred to as the multiplier. In North America, for example, multipliers range from as small as 1.2 for a fund county to 4.1 for Los Angeles and 14.4 for the entire U.S.A. The direct spending should be expanded by the appropriate multiprier for its economic area or "universe." It can now be understood why a larger area generates a larger multiplier, thereby creating a larger benefit. At the same time, the larSer area or economic universe is more likely to include a higher percentaBe of residents, thereby reducing the size of the benefit. Estimates of the appropriate multiplier may be derived from econometric or input-output models prepared specifically for a certain geographic area or, if estimates have not been prepared for your area, by relying on multipliers prepared for other areas which may have similar size and economic characteristics (as your own area). These calculations or econometric models are usually produced by economic development or planning agencies or universities under contract to local, state or national governments. 8 The accuracy or precision of the multiplier my be disputed. However, it would be very misleading not to include By amplification of the direct .pendi~ and thereby igntwe the certain impact of induced or indirect spending which does occur and is just as dependent on the congress attendee as the direct spemding. The economic benefit or external revenues generated by the eonlFess' center may be determined by multiplying the number of non-resident -,ten, lee~_ to etmgtesam (without exhibits) times the aversfie expenditm per delegate (for the particular destination) times the multiplier. Revenues generated by non-resident artentices to trade shows and ~ with exhibits are calculated in a similar fashion, only usin~ a different, mtw. h hiSher, avera~,e expenditu~ per deleffate/attendee. (This hiSher ~Sure would include e~rli~ ~ I~ persons associated with the exhibition.) Similar calculations can be performed to determine speci~c (disaggregated) expwAitun~ for ~ ~csmm-.,ts and hotels. This faStare may then be utilized to calculate taxes and employment/jobs created by the congress center utilizing the appropriate tax rates and employment:sales mties, ~c~tx. etivcly. IV. Estimazing th~ Accurucy of tt~ Analysis: Credibility amt Rel;,,bitity The methedololD' described above my be mm, e or less precise dependin~ upon the availability of event-speei/ie data as ooa,patc~ to data ob~-Ined fer some other event, at some other destination, during some other period. The accuracy will aim depend greatly on the statistical reliability (sampling teehniclues) of the sm-vey exercise. Wege the eventi/attendees seleeted for the survey representative of all the congress evenu that year? Were they a complete emas- section and were the results for eaeh.~-oup weighted to reflect the mix of business in ternm of income eharaeteristies of -ttenclee~ (doeton va. teaehen), length of say, percent of non-resident attendees, persons per attendee, hotel tooms eceupied pet attendee, etc. The methodoloEy must be recoSnized as a logical, reasonable basis for estimating the external revenues generated. If the estimate is represented as bein~ based on a 100~ survey, employin~ a precise multiplier and ineluding a census of employment (before and after the event!) it will be subject to skeptieisra, at best, and mo~ likely rejection. As with any estimate, the exercise can be no more accurate than the least accurate input, weiF, hted by its relative importance. For example, since the total benefit is based on use of the multiplier, if it is generally accepted the multiplier is accurate + 20%, then estimates of external revenues should be expressed as a range of ± 20% (and with the relevant number of significant digits!). The accuracy of the estimate of external revenues will never be comparable to the traditional accounting teehniclues employed to compute internal cash flow. Therefore, a candid and objective recognition of all opportunities to over-estimate or under-estimate the "net profit" should be addressed. These should include all revenues and expenses. Although it my not be practical or necessary to quantify each of these '~line items" they my be acknowledged in the report to reflect the 9 recognition of their existence and relative importance. F.~smples of non-quantitled beneths or revenues would include: Business reloeations stimulated by a congress attendee's "discovery" of an area's advantages as a result of attending a congress Pre- and print-event tourism generated by congreat attendee~ Technological advaneements/teehnolo~ transfer Produe~ exports g,~.nenuzd by exhibim to disphy/d,~ntkm · Examples of non-quantified expemses or e~m would include: · Costs for public services associated with event (Ix>lice security, waste removal, etc.) · Displacement or other business lest beeause eongress attentiees' oeeupaney turned away other visitors · Existing excess capacity in retail shops or otlr, r business which my mean that increased activity due to conStess center activities will not result in new employment. &:roman: Conci,--ion Congress centers are developed and operated with public funds to gainrate Iznefits to the local economy. Few eenten, however, routinely measure these benefits. The measurement is quite straightforward. We only need to follow some logical guidelines. DeFine carefully the area of impset or bene~L Include all non-residents assoeiated with the event. Non-residents live outside the benefit area. 10 If you do not conduct your own delegate survey, adjust estimates of attendee spending per day ~at another center) for.' - Length of stay (event and pr~-/post-travel) - Local travel cost index - Local curvzncy - Inflation -- Ratio of delegates to persons in party Estimate the "number of spending rounds" or multiplier for the economic benefit area to calculate dir~t and indirect spendin~ ~enerated. Determine the degree d accuracy of your estimates and explain in your report. Following these simple guidelines will provide your owners, sponsors and beneficiaries a reliable understanding of the economic and financial benefit of your congress center. Pric~ W~use Conlreu Ceruer Croup The Price Waterhouse Congress Center Croup is devoted exclusively to the ~eonomie analysis d public assembly facility development and operations, including: Market Demand and Utilization Studies · Development Strategies and Planning · Management Operations and Analysis · Financing and Funding Plans Expansion ~ and Building Programs Site Evaluation and Ranking For further information, contact David C. Petersen, Price Waterha, P.O. Box 2640, Tampa, FL 33601 (Tel: 813/222-5406, Fax: 813/222-7116). 11 Confessions of a "Feasibility Study" Consultant (How Big is My Business?) By David C. Petersen Economic consulting is a business and it detiniely is cou,p~lillve. From time to time, univenities, ~ovemment agencies or not-for-profit orBanizatiens may conduct s fessibih'ty study. This is increasingly a ram occurnnce. I would es~tepe~i~psmo~eth~n99pecentof private, for-profit businesses. AU ente~mes, if ~ survive, have a busme~ pILn. Wl%.thE this pILn is explicit "in WTitmg" O~ implicitly "un- denrood," it will include t~e toLlowing elements: Define product o~ sevice Estm~te mmd2e~ o~ pol~t~/ pmvidL, tg this pnx~uct or or product De~Lne how you~ p~xtuct o~ product or se~ic~ provided by other comp~i..es Prepare ~ pm torm~ budget My first expenen~ in economic consulting began in 1967 in New York City. Over the past 25 years, I've been employed in this business which has been described by various name: contract research, municipal financial estate economic planning services and, at this stage in my career, sports and convention facilities advisory services. ciescribed, ithssbeen2~ysusof "feasibility studies." And dozens of business plans, prospective and ex post facto. Believe me, they all include the same eight elemems. FACILITY MANAGER JULY - SEPTEMBER 1993 Define Product or Service There sr~ s~veral ways to d~-sne the brochures snd read how they describe their services. Locaecopies~f/ssibilitystudiein the library o~ a univemt3es school of urbsn plsnnm8, landscape srchiectuxe or a dry planning dep&,taent. Conduct a telephone survey of dry developers, andaskthemwhatm- firms to help them plan ma~or project~ Acombinationoftheseso~c~wiil providea balsnced view of the economic and Financial planning services provided bycorsulfin~fu'ms. Abssic listofthe services my finn provides to current or pr~'pe,.five owners of stadiums, arenas, conven~n cenm's or amphitheaers in- dudes: Market demand and Lllili-:~tiOtl studies Estimate operating revenues and expenses Expansion planning and building programs Development strategies and plan- Site evaluation and ranking Management plans and operations Facility. valuations Financing and funding plans Acquisition "due diligence" Estimate Number o~ Potential Clients This estimate is directly related to the next two topics: how many compa- nies provide this service (and how big is their staff), and what is the market price for their service? Let's assume we can- amphitheaters, convention cenen and civic centers. Let's further assume this inventory comprised about 1,500 facili- ties. Next, our survey revealed 10 per- cett, or 150, whosaid ttmycommimamd astudywithintheputtwdvemonthsior an average cmt of S30J300.' This number should suggest how msny profr '.'2~1 studies times $30~0, and we assume is required for saisris (*t sn avenge of approximately 60 ~ staff to be employed. If our analy~s of sll the c~mpetitive DetennineifDemandbGmwin~or Shrinking referred to as public aeemb~ fa~ities, and found both the number of these fa- cilities and the pmpensit~ of the own- ets to hire consultin8 rums to estimae not dedinin8. We rosy ws~lt to be in this business. Determine Market Share A favorite new word is "niche. lately, the word is often used in its eco- loSical sense - "the area within a habitat occupied by an orBsnits" (hesum,bly, no two orBanisms can oc~upy the same niche at the ~ time.) The question becomes, "Are there, witin this (eli- tem) forwhichwemaybeuniquelysuited o~ spec~iy adapted?" The amwe~, as it tums out, isyes. Now we'H~othtouBha berofpotentia]dienlawhichaxelmtor dimmated at each sta~e in the selection Feasibility Can We Differentiate Out Service (Offer a Better Motmeitap)? If I may digress a little. Ove~ the a~orementioned 25 yeu span, Fve heard a lot of the same questions repeated: There are several companies Like yours. Don't you all do pretty much the same thing? 13o you ever tell a client their project won't work" (rye never seen a feasiliW study with a negative conclusion.) If your report can't be used to obtain financing, why does anyone ever hire you? With all your travel on airplanes, don't you get claustrophobic? Didn't your ex-wives olc~ct to aH that travel? You must travel to a lot of interesemg places. (Asked in Sioux Falls, SD) And the answer is no, we don't all do the same thing. At least we don't do it the same way, and many of us will not be considered for the same assignment. Hopefully, the issue of product differen- tiation will become clearer m the discus- sion of the next topic. Begin - Quantify the Universe Even though there may be approxi- mately 200 facilities built, proposed, ex- panded or purchased each year, only 150 owners or prospective owners commis- sioned a feasibility or valuation study. Therefore, the market universe is 150. Identify Budget Limits 430) Some clients can only spend a lim- ited sum appmved or budgeted for "the study." Someone will do the study for that sum. If our tirm/group cannot pro- vide the service for that fee, we're out of this market. Some firms will "cut the suit to fit the cloth." ff they believe ten inde- pendent anal.vtical ta/ks are required for the most reliable estimates, and the client has budgeted only $17,000, they'll get the phone survey. A prudent manner will not rely on only one .type of navigational aid or method. Our universe of opportu- nities is now reduced to 120. FACILITY MANAGER JULY-SEPTEMBER 1993 Geographical Hirin8 Requirements (35) ff our finn is required to have an office in the client's city and we don't, we're out. Now we have only 85 poten- tial or "candidate" clients this year. Fu~n or Individual Conflict (25) ffourfh-mrepresentsanotherdient with interest that my be peiceived as competitive with the prospective client, we should not propose. Even if it is not a legal conilia o~ mtenst, perceptions to60. ClientExpectation(20) Many clients (m. ore than we may want to know) expect the consultant to estimae a favorable or acceptable level dusaSe,~napelslpertm"ntanceor~scal wfilhixeacomultanttoaffirm thesize facility they have planned, on the sire they have selected, with the booking aBement team the~ have identified, etc., etc. R is not as elsy ~ot the consuJtant to discover clients with tiese expectations as it is fot the potential cilent to discovet thecansultant's~tos~nntheit plan. If the consultant does not believe their planned facility is optimally sized, located or profitable, and the client has already reserved the date for the grand opening, then the consultant should: Not prepare a proposal Not attend the bidden' information meeting. Not uncletake extensive reconruti~ sance work. Not prepare ~or and travel to and present his/her team at the in- Not disclose to anyone the (m~e) ~ for buillrlg tO teSpO!ld, travel to or interview for this Thisisamaiorhard(ffnot~-~ major hazard) for the camcjentious sultanLFaiungt0meetthedient'sexpec- tations for. study caadusians mulls in nario. Theclient:willnotwanttopayyou or threaten to sue; will give you a bad ref~ence;willttytodisaedityoutmeth- odok~;willetdtavorm~tyour firm in thelocalarm. ltwould be betm' for this co~.sultsnt if halite had revet the client csm sense the consultant~s pre- ai~0meion to independence without the antwillonlyb3setheinvestmentinthesir etc..~ few thousand dolhr~ By ~ Point in the ~ plan precess, we have discevex~l thereal size 50 percent "kit rate," weql do 20. At $30~00 averaBe fee per smdy, that's to support a sts~ o~ about eiSht ~ Ascan be seen by now, the ability to survive in this bumnme or pro _f,_,.;e_d__'___'_orml practice roll deped upon accurate de- terrainalton of several key vadablas - latBemeasuteofhardwodcbaSOper- ce~t hit rate realistic? How ma~y clots with very spec~c exlnctations ~ the consultant fail to identity? Marketing consume a 10 percent planned profit margin very quicldy. Fallin8 to under- takesuftclentrecora,-i ,,.ees~theback- lead to cetaln fallum, even ff the consult- The budget wll] include estimatas of Cotsuiting has become more capital phones, etc.? The old definilion of an expert was a person with a brie ~ more than 150 miles from home. / that person needs several dozen printed ers and CRTs. Feasibility How BiB is This BusimP ff this ~ h~ $t,'ved any P~,Ihopeitl~shelpedtoexpL~n: The real market may be 20 percent of the umverst We may need a $0 percent capture rate to survive. (If we knew the rec~zired succem rate or win- loss l:~ramtm~e, mid we're risk averse, we nuychomeanother career.) There is amuchsmsihn. mark~niche ~or delivem~ a quality sem~ ing~exibbcxmclusionsatalow pnce. One'thing iscex~ain. Over the past 25 years, the need for r~lisble snd honest economic snsJysis is B~sts todsy than it has ever been. Development snd opa- al~g costs for public sssembly hcilities are relatively highez and there is less abili~ for local governments snd team owners to pay for them. · Dared C. Petersen is managing director of the Price Wate~msse Sports rind Conven- tion Facilities AdvLsorsj Group. He is the author of Convention Centers, Stadiums and Arenas, ~mblished lnJ tkt Urhm Land Institute. FACILITY MANAGER JULY-SEFTEMBER 1993 O 1994 Am,m tEA :n ANNUAL R Pon Volume 1 Copyright s}1994. INTRODUCTION SURVEY RESPONSES The Price Waterhouse Entertainment Facilities Advisory Gwup is pleased to report the results d our annual survey d amphitheater facilities. This report includes survey responses from major amphitheaters throughout the United States. We would like to acknowledge the efforts d amphi- theater managers and staff for their participation. This being the first year d our amphitheater survey, we plan to publish annually a report that can be relied upon as a useful management tool to assist amphitheater mana~rs analyze and manage their specific venue. Survey forms were sent to managers d all major amphithe- aters in the United States. Information from over fifteen amphitheaters was obtained and used in compiling the report statistics. Each manager responding to the survey was provided with a confidential report comparing his or her venue to the average and range for all amphitheaters. The information gathered for this report addresses the following topics: · Seating and Parking Capacities · Utilization · Attendance · Tieket Prices · Concession and Novelty Per Capitas · Parking · Operating Expenses · "guestion of the Year" · Amphitheater Growth 1994 Amph/~heam- Anmm/P,~pon I '- SEATING AND PARKING CAPACITIES Amphitheauus vary signifieandy in both total seating and the mix of fixed seating versus lawn seating. The average amphitheawx tspondi~ go our survey had a total seatins ~pacity of 15,700, ~mprised of approximately 48 pe~ent fixed seats and 52 percent lawn seats. In addition, the average amphitheater has approximately 5,700 parking. spaces, or one space for every three seas within the facility. The seating and parking capacities for the amphitheaters included in our study arc shown in Table 1. UTILIZATION TABLE1 SEA~NGAND PAR~NGCAPACI~ES Ave M~N MAX Seating Capacity - Total. 15,700 8,700 22,500 - Fixed 7,500 2,700 18,000 - Lawn 8,200 0 15,500 Parking Capacity 5,700 3,000 10,000 Regarding the adequacy of the number of fixed seats in their venues, 50 percent d amphitheater managers were satisfied with the number of fixed seats in their veaue · while 50 percent would like additional fixed seating. ~ Managers of amphitheaters with less than 7,500 fixed seats desire additional fixed seating while those. managers whose venues have at least 7,500 fixed seats are satisfied with the number of fixed seats. In general, reeendy built amphitheaters have total seating capacities in excess of 15,700 with fixed seats and lawn seats comprising approximately 40 and 60 percent, rcspee- tively, of total seating capacity. In addition, many newer amphitheaters have approximately 30-35 luxury suites with 4-6 seats per suite. Amphitheater utilization is comprised primarily of concert events. Only two amphitheaters responding to our survey hosted symphonies in addition to concerts. Table:2 sum- marizes the number d pedormanees and average actual attendance per performance for eoncerts and symphonies. TABIX 2 UTILIZATION Ave MIN MAX Performances - Concerts 34 16 71 Symphonies ~ 13 4 21 Attendance per Performance Cons 8,700 4,600 13,600 Symphonies z 6,500 3,100 10,000 1 Aver~es beJude .din only from amphitheaters that hosted symphonies. ATTENDANCE Attendance at amphitheater evens varies both in total attsradanee and the proportion of patrons who purchase tickets venus patrons who reeeive "complimentary" tickets. For concerts and symphonies, the number of "no-shows,. people who purchase tickets to an event but do not attend the event, am difficult to quantify due to complimentary tioket give-aways, oorporate sponsorship and other ptomo- tiomd efforts designed to promote event awareness. For all but one of the amphitheater rcspondents, actual attendance exceeded paid attenclanee. Table 3 presents attendanee clata~ TABLE 3 ANNUAL ATTENDANCE AVG MIN MAX Total Paid Attendance Concern 262,000 68,000 506,000 - Symphonies ~ 81,000 8,500 154,000. Total Actual Attendance - Concerts 296,000 78,000 557,000 - Symphonies ~ lll,000 . 12,000 210,000 Paid to Actual Percentage - Concerts 89% 87% 101% Symphonies z 73% 71% 73% 1 Averages include dam only from amphitheaters that hosted symphonies. 1994 Amphitheater Annual l~n 3 TICKET PRICES To provide amphitheater managers with a measurement by which they could evaluate their ticket price levels, ~ross ticket price information was obtained for concerts and symphonies as well as the average tax on tickets. This information is summarized in Table 4. TABLE 4 TICKEr PRICES IN 1993 DOLLARS AvG MIN MAX Concerts $18.25 S12.85 $24.70 Symphonies $20.55 $14.05 $27.05 Average Tax on Tickets 3% 0% 10% Approximately 50 percent of the participating amphithe- aters had some form of tax on tickets. CONCESSION'AND NOVELTY PER CAPITAS In recent years, amphitheater operators have recognized the growing importance d concessions and novelty sales reve- nue. This has led to changes in both the design and range d concession and novelty products. A summary of Foss concession and novelty sales per capitas for concerts and symphonies is presented in Table 5. TABLE 5 GROSS CONCESSION & NOVELTY SALES PER CAP~A IN 1993 DOLLARS Ave MIN MAX Concessions - Concerts $4.55 $1.50 $6.45 - Symphonies $0.45 $0.00 $0.85 Novelties Concerts $3.20 31.35 $4.90 Symphonies $O.00 $0.00 $0.00 Concession and novelty sales per capita were significantly higher at newer amphitheaters than at older venues. This can be attributed to the newer amphitheaters having up- scale concession'items, increased number of merchandisin$ points and brand name [ood Outlets- 4 199~ Amp/ddmmr ~ Repm ~'~ C PARKING OPERATING EXPENSES 1994 Amphitheater Anmud Report The parking fee for concerts at the majority d amphitheaters is approximately $4.00 per car. Amphitheaters hosting symphonies do not charge a parking fee to attend symphony performances. As noted earlier, the average amphitheater has dppwximately 5,700 parking spaces. Based on an average actual attendance figure of 8,700 patrons for concerts and three patrons per car, the average amphitheater uses approximately 3,000 parking spaces per concert. Table 6 presents parking fees and parking revenue per. capitas for concerts. TABLE 6 PARKING DATA IN 1993 DOLLARS Parking Fee per Car Parking Revenue per Capita ArC MtN MAX $3.75 $2.50 $10.00 $1.30 $0.00 $2.65 To provide amphitheater managers with data by which they could analyze their operating co~ts, we obtained operating expense data including talent fees, event advertising and promotions, salaries and wage~, utilities, maintenance and supplies, insurance and other expenses. Total operating . expenses for the average amphitheater, including and excluding talent fees, respectively, was approximately 34.7 and $1.7 million. Table 7 provides a breakdown of amphitheater operating expenses, excluding talent fees. TABLE 7 OPERATING EXPENSES IN 1993 DOLLARS (THOUSANDS) % OF AvG TOTAL MIN MAX Event Adv./Promo. S 547 32% $ 20 $1,584 Sal., Wages & Benefits 519 -31 80 1,300 Utilities 58 3 6 94 Maint. &Supplies 93 6 25 243 Insurance 89 5 37 284 Other 378 23 0 '1,368 Total $1.684. 1,_,00~ $168 '~4~873 QUESTION OF THEYEAR As pafi of our survey, we included a "Question of the Year" which asked amphitheater managers: "In the next two years, do you expect the number of concerts in your facility to increase, decrease, or remain the same? Explain." Responses are summarize~bHow. INCREASE - 12% CREASE SAME - AMPHITHEATER GROWTH As shown in the chart above, 63 percent of amphitheater managers anticipate the number of concerts to increase in their venues. · The majority of amphitheater managers who expect growth in the number of concerts their facility will host operate newer amphitheaters or amphitheaters that have recently been renovated. These managers expect growth in the number of concerts their venues will host due to: · Their vcnuc is relatively new and has begun to build their reputation and contacts in the industry. · Their facility has been renovated with greater seating and parking capacities to host larger acts. Responses from amphitheater managers anticipating a decrease or the same level of concert activity expressed these reasons for their expectations: · Their facility currently hosts the maximum number of acts their market can support. · Their facility is currently hooked for the summer season ~ . and does not have any available dates to host additional · conceitS. In recent yem,~, there has been a significant increase in the . .' ..~. number of amphitheaters in the United States. During the past .. ten years alone, over twenty amphitheaters have been built. Currendy, there are over 60 amphitheaters in operntion 'during . a pottim of the calendar year. 'rne rapid increase in the The prollfeuuicm of outdoor amphitheaters in recent years is due to th~ ~ in music industry economics as well as the elmn~ in market damaogra~ia. Today, promoters am fagling it mm~ 12~ditah~e to develop and operate their own · fa~ity as ol,ld to mnti~ one. By operating their own In talmud to changing demographics, many industry analysts point to a~e grating strength of the baby-boom market. This Woodstor'.k ~meratiou, wbi_eh was weaned on rock and has r~ilmmvem:l its alFmity for live music and has begun attemling outdoor amphitheaters for the live It is expected'there will be etmtinued grmvth in the numlzr of amphitheaten with both private and public money being ut;li,~! to finsnee the development of these faeRities, As indicated in th~ ~ pie chart, the participating amphitheaters in our survey have been finnneed thrt.~h a eombirmtion of public and private money. PRiVA~ DOLLARS- 38% PUBHC DOLLARS- 62% The use of private and public funding to develop amphitheau~s is expected to ecmtinue due to increased ecnnpetititm among eoneert prominers and cities to attmet nets to their facilities and loealities. 1994 Amphitheater Annual Repon 7 ABOUT PRICE WATERHOUSE'S ENTERTAINMENT FACII/IIES ADVISORY GROUP · MmketDatm~&UulbmimSui~ · IL.l~,...aSuseSismdRsm- · F. mm~_p_iu~inpillcmmllyrsc~ip/&ve.k~,,,~maqxrsdem · C-dkw-- !m~a~~mm,~ HockeyLmS~ Prk~W~"skoscfi~y~volved~n,ervinSeve~ I-,' ' ~m=eisfims~mmbjees- - '-'d~wi~pismi~ &v~op.,..amdepemlmdpublicsman~yfr.~i6m. inrmmtim m indumy unnk md StaffmmlzemhaveakobemqutsedinperiodicsbmchmtheNewYat Tenre, Wa!l Sumet Jmxml md WmhinStm Pmt. The Smup's dimcsor b U~ L~ Im~_ ~ ,mr] ~ dd,, Zra.,u.~..,. FacaldmAd,,kxT Cn~ evide~ or in p~n, or /,,r /urd~ i,fr, rmdm er ~ pleme am~ De~ Per,~ Menqing Dimsr . P~ graerlmsm · P.a B= 2640, T~np2. ~ 33(J01 (rd,. 8131223-7577 a, Fv... al312~-7008). :/ A Message from the Chairman: uali~' is a much used and abused word in todav's business world. At Price Waterhouse. quality has been our watchword for 100 vears. For us it is qot a slogan: it is a resolute professional commitment. the key to our cede of client service. Our tradition of excellence has been built on an unwavering commitment to the highest quality client service. rendered by profession'As with a strong sense of integrity and dedication to exacting standards of professional conduct. Our commitment to qualit)' has been contirmed by our 1990 peer review. I am proud to report that the 1990 peer review of Price Waterhouse's accounting and auditing practice resulted in an unqualified opinion and no letter of comment. The peer review report appears on page 3 of this booklet. Peer reviews of major firms have historically resulted in the issuance of a letter of comment ' recommeqding improvements in the system of quality control. In our profession. a peer review without a letter of comment--that is. without a letter identi~'ing where improvements are needed--represents the epitome of quality. This is the tirst time that a peer review of a major firm concluded with no letter of comment. II A.A. binmet, Jr., chairman ef Ibe Public Oversight Boanl, cengmtulating Shaun O'Mdley on the line's 1990 peer review mrs. "This is In historic occasion. Your finn should be very proud of its mmnplbhment," aid Ill'. Sofn~iero Without question, a new standard has been set. It is particularly rewarding to have the quality of our practice and the impressive pedormance of our people acknowledged by our peers. Yet we recognize the need to intensify our efforts to ensure that we maintain this - leadership position by complying not only with the pmfession's strict standards but also with Price Waterhouse's own even more stringent standards. As evidence of our commitment to provide the highest quality service available in our profession, we have formulated The Client Bill of Rights. This statement distills the cede of client service that drives---and inspirc~ Price Waterhouse professionals. It appears on pages 5.-7 for your review. We are pleased to receive this x~.~gnition. We pledge to you a continuation of the high level of quality services you have come to expect from us. Shaun F. O'Malley Chairman and Senior Partner i Serf-Regulation and the Peer Review he U.S. public accounting profession instituted in 1978 a thorough prop'am of serf-regulation designed to monitor, test and, where neeessay, mandate improve- ments in the quality of accounting and auditing services provided to public companies. Endorsed by the SEC, the peer re~iew program is one of this nation' s major safelpards to assure the intelp'ity and credibility of corporate financial reporting. Price Waterhouse has strongly supported the peer review program from its inception. Responsibility for the peer review process is vested at sevend different levels of authority: · The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) originated the ~uidelines for the peer review program and continues to revise those guidelines as required. · A peer farm is enSaffed, once every three years, to review the quality of the accounting and auditing services provided by the finn under review. · The Public Oversight Board, an independent private-sector body, monitors the conduct of the peer review and reports its observations and recommendations to the AICPA. The SEC pedorms its own independent evaluation d the effectiveness d the peer review process and Board oversight, and has reported to Congress that the peer review process "should enhance the consistency and quality of praetiee before the Commission." The Client Bill o! RigMs Our clients have: 7be dgM to protmional excelle.ce We will be technically proficient in all areas in which we provide advice. We will stay current on business and technical developments and seek counsel from appropriate firm professionals when in doubt about a course of action. We will keep abreast of all issues affecting our client so that we can anticipate challenges and provide appropriate advice. The dgM to be served by prolssei0nab Mm uudmnd timit business We will learn all we can about our client's industry and business. We will 'get to know people within the client organization and outside it who have in-depth knowledge of the client's business, its culture, and its strategic objectives, and we will listen to our client to understand its needs. Being in the thick of our client's businca: not on the sidelines--will allow us to identify and anticipate issues of concern to our client. While others may learn on the job, we will strive to know as much as possible about the client and its industry before we ever begin working with a client. The dgM to proactive advice and creative businto ideas We will take the initiative in proposing actions to enhance our client's success, striving always to offer the innovative recommendations our client expects from. its business advisers. We will demonstrate to our client that we expect to be and are qualified to be among those who are consulted about significant client events at the planning stage. We will be thought of as the "idea people.'" When asked for creative ways to help our client achieve its objectives, we will be the firm that says, "Yes, can do...." i The rigN to independent viewpoints and pe.,~4?.Uves We wffi advise our client but actions that are b: its best lone-term interests. AJthough we WIG keep client objectives c]car]y Lq mind as we aid in decision-making, we WIll not be sycophants. We wffi have the independence of SpLrjt, the ~, and the confidence to rl~sco~ the client from pursuing a cotuse of action that we bdjeve to be flJ-advised. The dgM to-effective communication We will keep our client contacts informed about the progress of our work and any issues that require their attention. Our written communication Wi]] be literate and clear, and our oral communication equally articulate. We will treat our client contacts as professional equals, extending to them and their staffs the same courtesy and respect we ourselves expect. In our communications with client executives and staff, we will demonstrate that we are wall- rounded people that they can relate to on levels other than the professional one; clients like to do business with people who are interesting and personable, just as we do. The fight to a wide range of pr01enional ms0umes We wiU tap the extensive resources of Price Waterhouse to provide our client with the mOst experienced and savvy business edvice available. We will introduce our colleagues to our client contacts and, when relevant, involve them in client service planning and delivery. To promote weU-coordinated services, we will ensure that all appropriate Price Waterhouse professionals are kept informed about services proposed and provided to a client. The dgM to dependable sendce We will never miss a deadline or renege on a commitment. We will do it right the first time and complete the assignment better and faster than the client expects. We will avoid surprises about technical and reporting issues, fees, and staff turnover. When we are the best, we will let the client know; if we do not have the required depth in a particnis~r s. rea, we will have the confidence to direct the client elsewhere. i TIm rtOht to Mrvios an~/tinm anal an~simm We will always be available to our client, anytime and anyplace we are needed. That means spending more time in our client's office than in our own, being "on call" for our client at all times, and keeping in close touch with client contacts when we are not on the premises. And it means bringing the worldwide resources of the firm to bear on client issues, providing the services needed across town or across the globe. The riOlit to state-of-the-art technology We will take advantage of the vast technological resources the firm has created to benefit Price Waterhouse professionals and clients. We will use internal tools to enhance the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of our services. And we will implement Price Waterhouse proprietary software and customize other products that will help our client attain better management information and mote effective operations. The rigM to value-added service We will always be thinking about how our client can be mete successful and of ways we can help it achieve its business goals. We will make out client's concerns our concerns a~d put its needs ahead of our own. We will challenge ourselves and our client, asking the tough questions, not being afraid to be wrong. We will be ever vigilant in identifying additional ways we can strengthen our client' s competitive edge, ways in which we can offer even mote than the client expects. For aclcfit#onal mformat#on contact a Price Walerl~ouse office conven;ent to you. (212) 819-5000 FrAMFORD~CI~ 06~0t INOIANA ~te ~ (~1) ~ 4~ S~ MENLO ~ Wm~ R~O ( P ~ ~x 1~ Z~D 9~-7~' ~KL~D. ~ ~12-~ 455 Ca S~,te ~ .~ 0 Z,O ~-~75' 1916) 441-2370 ~ y 7~EK, MI e7 (813) ~3-757 SAN DIEGO. CA Su,te 24~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ (616) ~-1~1 1 I t r (619) 23~ -1~ ~6~3) 287-9~ {4151393-85~ ~ t 11~ i r SAN JOSE. t~ 2~ 2Bin Suete 3~ ~33 1 9~ Can ~en~. Suite 4 1 1 tl (~) ~ ~ (314) 42~ {NVER ~ ~2-~72 Suite 2~ (303) 893-81~ 628 (203~7-7~ i LONGISL~ID ~ 11753 100 Jef~N.~Y Quade'ange (516) 681-7114 New York NY 10036 (212) 944-9750 (315) 474-6571 NORTH CAROLINA 4i0~0~ 28290 (919) 725-0691 OHIO (513) 222-2100 e~l~te43604 (419) 247-1800 Suite 400 (405) 272-9251 GIF. GON PORTL&ND, OR 97204 101 S W Mare Street Sure 1700 (503) 224-9040 imIINdIYINANIA ee{~ 15219 I IN. AND 4401 ) 421-0501 ~te 1200 (803) 779-0930 IINNESIF. E JOHNSON CIT'~ TN 37601 (6151 929-912~ (901) 52:~8000 NASHVILLE. TN 3/205 4400 Harc~ng ROaO Su~e 300 {615) 292-5000 TEXAS (817) 64~1866 AUSTIN. TX 78701 Coner~ Avenue ~ulte 2(300 (512) 476-6700 1700 PaCific Argue Sude 1400 (214) 922-8040 ~{e 300 (214) 386-9922 FORT WORTH. TX 76102 1700 Cmty Cent~ Tower II 1201 L~shlna Sute 2900 (713) 654-4100 ANTORK:) I'X 78205 (512) 226-1100 UTAH SALT LAKE CfT~. UT 84111 175 Easl 400 ~th. Sa~e 700 (80) 328-2300 VERMONT Insurance S~fs Sude 440 (802) 864-0671 VIRGINIA (8{Y,) 622-5005 (804) 648-9261 WAIHIM61'ON 4e 2200 (206) 462-6550 WtNCON~N MILWAUKEE. WI 53202 100 East w;sc~n Arm Price Watefho,me PRICE WATERHOUSE FIRM PROFILE Price Waterhouse formed its Developsea AddsoP/helm Gro.p in 1990 to sewe clients whose primary needs are: · Credibility and objectivity · Client service · Worldwide reputation Price Waterhouse ensures the continuity of its reputation through its program of recruiting the Best and Brightest. The results of this program are borne out by objective measures. As noted in · survey published in the trade magazine, Professional Services Rev/ew, 'a greater percentage of [PW] hires are the top students from the top schools than any other firm.' Fortuna 500 executives ware recently asked to rank the B/g 6 accounting firms in various categories. On a scale of 1-10, survey participants ranked Price Waterhouse highest in ethics; Price Waterhouse's score of 8.5 was the highest individual firm score in any category. The firm began its U.S. operations in 1889 and today it employs 10,000 professional and technical staff in 100 offices throughout the United States. The Price Waterhouse World Firm is located in 111 countries in 448 offices. Price Waterhouse leads the Fortune 100, Forbes 100 Largest Multin~ionals (29% market share) end Dow Jones Industriais (47% market share) in number of clients. Regarding combined sales of clients, Price Waterhouse ranks first with $671 billion, representing 26% of total sales among the Forfun· 500. No B/g 6 firm is more stretegicaily focused on end organized to serve multinational companies than Price Waterhouse. The firm's achievements for quality work have been recognized by its peers. Several recent developments underscore the Price Waterhouse quality commitment. In 1990, Price Waterhouse received no recommendations for improvements in the exhaustive peer review process. This was the first time a major accounting firm received a perfect '0' since the AICPA established the peer program in 1978. Among the firm's clients are major multinational firms: · IBM * Bausch and Lomb · Hewlett-Packard · Bristol Meyars · MCI Communications · Alcan Aluminum · E.I. du Pont de Nemours · Scott Paper · W.R. Grace · Chevron · The Walt Disney Company · Amoco · Shell Oil · Exxon · F.W. Woolworth · Eastman Kodak · Goodyear T~re and Rubber · Seagram The Price Waterhouse Sports and Convention Facilities Advisory Group is devoted exclusively to economic analysis of public assembly facility development end operations end specializes in: · Market Demand end Utilization Studies · · Development Strategies and Planning * · Management Operations and Analysis · · Financing end Funding Plans · Expansion Planning and Building Programs Site Evaluation and Ranking Facility Valuations Acquisition "Due Diligence' Representative clients of the Sports and Convention Facilities AdvisoW Group include: · San Diego Convention Center · Anaheim Convention Center · Louisiana Superdome · Jacob Javits Convention Center (New York) · Georgia World Congress Canter (Atlanta) · Singapore International Convention and Exhibition Center Seattle Convention and Trade Center Perth Royal Showgrounds (Australia) Philippine CorNention and V'mitors Bureau Joe Robbia Stadium Phoenix 'Suns' Arena Artahem Arena Lexington Canter Theater/Opera House The group's professional support and partidpaticm in the assembly and meeting facilities industry includes: laternational Congress Center Anneal liepert - Price Waterhouse has been sdected to conduct the annual survey of member' facilities for an international association of congress centers. This information is presented by geographical iocation and size of all major centers and includes attendance, food and beverage sales, occupancy, rental revenue and exhibition space occupancy. Convention Center Annul Raprot - Price Waterhouse surveys every primary convention center with over 100,000 square feet of e~hiblt space and approximately 50 smaller facilities throughout the United States and Canada. We report annual convention and trade show average occupancy, attendance, food and beverage per capita sales and effective rental rates. Data Base and Bgildlag Rles- We malntahq currant records on building floor plans, financial data and city information for many major facilities in North Amedca. Pr01essi0sal Collemlces aid hellfin - Our staff address fNe tO tan professional associations annually on subjects associated with planning, development and operation of public assembly facilities. These groups include the Annual Stadium Managers Seminar, International City Manager Association's Sports & Events Martagemem Conference, International Association of Auditorium Managers, International Convention Center Conference, Association Internationale des Palale de Congres, the Urban Land Institute's Sports Fadlitles Seminar, Japan National Tourira Organization and others. The active involvement of our staff in the' activities of these organizations keeps us abreast of industry trends, facility development and related information. Publications and Researcli - The results of our research and analysis ere frequently pobiished such journals as Facility Manager; Conferences, Exhibitions & Incentives; Urban Land; Arnusemem Business; Convene; Practicing Planner and Tradeshow Week. Staff members have also been quoted in numerous magazines and newspapem such as the New York Times, I/Va/I Street Journg and Washington Post. David C. Petersen suthored a book, published by the Urban Land Im,litute, entitled Convention Centers, Stadiums and Arenas. The actMties and resources of the Sports and Convention Facilities Advisory Group evidence our commitment to improved spectator sports, entertainment and assembly facility development and operation.