HomeMy WebLinkAbout030894 CC AgendaAGENDA
TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
A REGULAR MEETING
TEMECULA COMMUNITY CENTER - 28816 PUJOL STREET
MARCH 8, 1994- 7:00 PM
EXECUTIVE SESSION: 6:00 PM, pursuant to Govemment Code Sections:
1.§ 54956.9{a)Conference with Legal Counsel - Exirdng Udgation
a. Modeflare vs the City of Temecule
b. Rancho Regional Shopping Center vs the City of Temecula
2. i 54956.9(b)Conference with Legal Counsel - Antidpated Udge~on (one
matter.
At approximately 9:45 PM, the City Council will determine which of the remaining
agenda items can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00 PM and may
continue all other items on which additional time is required until a future meeting.
All meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 PM.
CALL TO ORDER:
Invocation:
Flag Salute
ROLL CALL:
PRESENTATIONS/
PROCLAMATIONS
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. 94-08
Resolution:'No. 94-24
Mayor Ron Roberrs presiding
Pastor Charles Graham, New Covenant Fellowship
Councilmember Parks
Birdsall, Mufioz, Parks, Stone, Roberrs
Expression of Appreciation for Joseph Alcorn, DVM
Presentation by Temecula Police Department
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Council on
items that are not listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited
to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council on an item not listed on the
Agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink 'Request to Speak' form should be filled out
and filed with the City Clerk.
R:%,t4e~de%030894 I
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all other 8gend8 items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk
before the Council gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual
speakers.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made at
this time. A total, not to exceed, ten (10) minutes will be devoted to these reports.
CONSENT CALENDAR
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be
enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless members
of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for
separate action.
2
Standard Ordinance Adootion Procedure
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions
included in the agenda.
Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve the minutes of February 8, 1994;
3
Resolution Aoorovino List of Demands
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 94-,_
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING
CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
R:~er, da~3OBl4 2
4
City Treasurer's ReDort
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Receive and file the City Treasurer's report as of January 31 ', 1994.
J
Ynez Corridor Sales Tax Ac3reement and Joint Financing Agreement for Solana Way
Widening
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1
Approve and authorize the Mayor to sign, the following in substantially the
form presented, subject to approval by the City Manager and City Attorney
as to the final form of the agreements:
"First Amendment to the Agreement between City of Temecula and
Eli Lilly and Company, an Indiana Corporation regarding Sales Tax
Revenues of Community Facilities District No. 88-12."
0
"First Amendment to Agreement between the City of Temecula and
Rancho Mobile Home Estates regarding Sales Tax Revenues of
Community Facilities District No. 88-12 (Ynez Corridor)" and
"First Amendment to Joint Financing Agreement Between Community
Facilities District No. 88-12 of the County of Riverside and the City of
Temecula"
Award of Contract for Solana Way Street Improvements (Project No. PW93-12)
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1
Award a contract for the Solana Way Street Improvements, Project PW 92-
12, to E. L. Yeager Construction Company for $149,570.00 and authorize
the Mayor to execute the contract subject to approval by the County of
Riverside and the adjacent property owners.
6.2
Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the
contingency amount of $1 4,957.00, which is equal to 10% of the contract
amount.
Solicitation for Construction of a Single Concrete Box Culvert on Ynez Road
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1 Authorize solicitation for bids for construction of a single box culvert located
on Ynez Road, 365 feet south of Vallejo Avenue on the east side of Ynez
Road.
Destruction of Records Reauest
RECOMMENDATION:
8.1 Approve scheduled destruction of certain records as provided under the City
of Temecula approved Records Retention Policy.
,
Release Faithful Performance Warranty Bonds and Material and Labor Bonds in Tract No.
21674-F
RECOMMENDATION:
9.1 Authorize the release of Street and Water and Sewer Improvement Faithful
Performance Warrant Bonds and Material & Labor Bonds in Tract No. 21674-
F.
9.2 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors.
10.
11.
Final Parcel MaD No. 27509
RECOMMENDATION:
10.1 Approve Final Parcel Map No. 27509 subject to the attached conditions of
approval.
Second Reading of Ordinance No. 94-06
RECOMMENDATION:
11.1 Read by title only and adopt an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 94-06
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, AMENDING
SECTION NO. 18.28.A.C.(10)OF ORDINANCE NO. 348 PERTAINING TO THE TYPE
OF PAVING MATERIAL REQUIRED FOR ACCESS TO SECOND DWELLING UNITS
R:~kgende~0308~4 4
12. Second Reading of Ordinance No. 94-07
RECOMMENDATION:
12.1 Read by title only and adopt an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 94-07
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING
LAND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 164, LOCATED ON
THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF NICOLAS ROAD AND NORTH GENERAL KEARNY
ROAD
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before a public
hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of
the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court,
you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the
public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior
to, the public hearing.
13. Contiguous Parcel Maroar Ordinance
RECOMMENDATION:
13.1 Read by title only and introduce an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 94-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING
SECTION 16.7 OF ORDINANCE NO. 460 PERTAINING TO THE MERGER OF
CONTIGUOUS PARCELS.
14. Ordinance Amending Land Use Code reuarding Plot Plans, Conditional Use Permits and
Public Use Permits
(Continued from the meeting of February 22, 1994)
RECOMMENDATION:
14.1 Read by title only and introduce an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 94-__
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING
THE LAND USE CODE REGARDING THE TERM OF PLOT PLANS, CONDITIONAL
USE PERMITS AND PUBLIC USE PERMITS
R:~lendai) 30884 6
14.2 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 94~_.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE LAND USE
CODE REGARDING THE TERM OF PLOT PLANS, CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS AND
PUBLIC USE PERMITS.
COUNCIL BUSINESS
15. Ordinance Esta blishino an Industrial Develooment Authority and Acceoting an Aoolication
on Behalf of Tension Envelooe Corooration
RECOMMENDATION:
15.1 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 94-._
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, DECLARING
THE NEED FOR AN INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND DECLARING
THAT SUCH AUTHORITY SHALL FUNCTION WITHIN THE CITY
15.2 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 94---
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ON BEHALF
OF THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA,
ACCEPTING THE APPLICATION OF TENSION ENVELOPE CORPORATION
16.
Allocation of Funds for Continued Conceot Study of Old Town Temecula Entertainment
Center
RECOMMENDATION:
16.1
Approve an amendment to the Memorandum of Understanding between the City of
Temecula, the Temecula Redevelopment Agency and T.Z.B.G., Inc. (Zev Buffman)
and allocating $125,000 from the Redevelopment Agency for use in researching the
feasibility of a private/public partnership.
17.
Consideration of Suooort for Suoolemental Bond Sale for Assessment District No. 159.
(Placed on the agenda at the request of Councilmember Parks
R:'~,Oeada~030894 8
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: March 22, 1994, 7:00 PM, Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol
Street, Temecula, California
R:'~e~enda~O308~l. 7
TE~E~ULA CO~UHIT'Y SERVICES ~I~TRI~T ~EETI~ - fie ~ he!U at 8:00)
CALL TO ORDER: President Jeffrey E. Stone
ROLL CALL: DIRECTORS: Birdsall, Mu~oz, Parks, Roberts, Stone
PUBLIC COMMENT: Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors, should present a
completed pink "Request to Speak" to the City Clerk. When you are called
to speak, please come forward and state your name and address for the
record.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Award of Contract for Soorts Park Slooe Reoairs (Proiect No. PW 93-06CSD)
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Award a contract for the Sports Park slope repairs, Project PW 93-06CSD, to
American Contracting, Inc. for $223,445.00 and authorize the President to execute
the contract.
1.2 Authorize the General Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the
contingency amount of $22,344.50, which is equal to 10% of the contract amount.
1.3 Appropriate $246,000.00to Account No. 210-166-648-5804.
1.4 Authorize a transfer of $246,000.00 from T.C.S.D. fund balance to the Capital
Projects-Disaster Relief fund.
Discussion of the Develooment of a Master Plan for the Parkview Site
(Placed on the Agenda at the request of Mayor Pro Tem Stone and Councilmember Munoz)
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Provide direction to staff regarding preparation of a Master Plan of possible facilities
and their locations as well as recreational uses of the City property known as the
Parkview site.
R:%Aeende~O~OSe4 8
GENERAL MANAGERS REPORT - Bradley
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT - Nelson
BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT: Next regular meeting March 22, 1994, 8:00 PM, Temecula Community
Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California
R:~eende~O3OBI4 9
TEMFCU~ A R;nLmV'FI ~PM~NT A~FNCY M~t~I"INP-
CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Ronald J. Parks presiding
ROLL CALL: AGENCY MEMBERS: Birdsall, Muftoz, Robarts, Stone, Parks
PUBLIC COMMENT:
AGENCY BUSINESS
Anyone wishing to address the Agency, should present a completed
pink "Request to Speak" to the City Clerk. When you are called to
speak, please come forward and state your name and address for the
record.
1. ApprOval Of Funding Mechanism for Soecial Studies -- Old Town Temecula Proiect
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1
Approve an amendment to the Memorandum of Understanding between the
City of Temecula, the Temecula Redevelopment Agency and T.Z.B.G., Inc.
(Zev Buffman).
2.2
Approve an appropriation of $125,000 from the Redevelopment Agency fund
balance to Account #280-199-999-5248for use in researching the feasibility
of a private/public partnership.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
AGENCY MEMBER'S REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT:
Next regular meeting March 22, 1994, 8:00 PM, Temecula Community
Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California
R:~,~ge~le~0308~4 10
ITEM
1
ITEM
NO.
2
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
HELD FEBRUARY 8, 1994
A regular meeting of the Temecula City Council was called to order at 7:13 PM st the
Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California. Mayor Ron
Roberts presiding.
PRESENT 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall,
Roberrs
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Mufioz, Parks, Stone,
Also present were City Manager David F. Dixon, City Attorney Scott F. Field, and City Clerk
June S. Greek.
EXECUTIVE SESSION
A meeting of the City of Temecula City Council was called to order at 5:37 PM. It was moved
by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Stone to adjourn to Executive Session
pursuant to Government Code §54957.6 regarding Labor Negotiations and §54956.9(a)to
discuss pending litigation regarding Pechanga Reservation v. City of Temecula; Lake Villages
Homeowners Association v. City of Temecula; City of Temecula v. Fremont Financial; and
Rancho Regional Shopping Center v. City of Temecula. The motion was unanimously carried.
INVOCATION
The invocation was given by Bishop Bob Ford, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day
Saints.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The audience was led in the flag salute by Councilmember Stone.
PRESENTATIONS/
PROCLAMATIONS
Mayor Ron Roberrs proclaimed February 13-19, 1994 to be "Toughlove Week". Linda Semet
accepted the proclamation on behalf of Paul and Becky Jeffrey. She thanked the Mayor and
City Council for the proclamation, and announced that Toughlove will be having a community
information night, at Valley Christian Fellowship Church on February 17, 1994 at 7:30 PM.
Mayor Roberrs proclaimed the month of February as "American Heart Month." Christine
McCuster of Kid's World Preschool, along with Brittany Stone, Scott Swam, David Loyst and
Loran Byrne received the proclamation.
City Council Minutes February 8. 1994
Mayor Roberrs proclaimed February 26th and 27th as "1994 Rod Run Days". Frank Spencer
accepted the proclamation and thanked the Council for their sponsorship.
PUBLIC FORUM
None given ........
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Councilmember Parks stated he attended a SCAG meeting last week, and reported the
comprehensive plan deadline will probably be extended 30-60 days due to the earthquake.
Mayor Robarts announced that the Local Government Commission presented an Ahwanee
Community Design Award to the City of Temecula for the Village Center Concept in the newly
adopted General Plan. He thanked Planning Director Gary Thornhill and Senior Planner John
Meyer for their efforts.
Director of Planning Thornhill thanked Mayor Robarts for his participation and said this award
is important because it stresses quality of life as the most important design and planning
consideration, which is what the City has been striving for.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Mayor Pro Tam Stone requested the removal of Item 6 from the consent calendar.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Stone to approve
Consent Calendar Items 1-5 and 7-10.
The motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Standard Ordinance Adootion Procedure
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1
Birdsall,
Robarts
None
None
Mu~oz, Parks, Stone,
Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions
included in the agenda.
2
City Council Minutes
2.
e
e
e
Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve the minutes of January 25, 1994.
Resolution Aooroving List of Demands
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1
February 8. 1994
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 94-10
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
City Treasurer's Report
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Receive and file the City Treasurer's report as of December 31, 1993.
Acceptance of an Offer of Dedication and Acceptance Into the City-Maintained Street
System - A Portion of Camoanula Way
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 94-11
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA,
CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE OFFER OF DEDICATION AND ACCEPTING INTO
THE CITY-MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM, A PORTION OF CAMPANULA WAY
Contract Change Orders No, 41 through No. 44 for Ynez Road Widening Project.
PW9~--05. CFD 88-1 ~
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1
Approve the final Contract Change Orders No. 41 through No. 44 for
Ynez Road Widening Project, PW92-05 for labor and equipment for
various items of work, in the amount of e2,397.62;
3
Ciw Council Minutes
7.2
February 8. 1994
Approve the transfer of funds between accounts .to fund the net
adjustments made to the original contract quantities in the amount of
$29,316.16.
e
Desion Services Contract - Ranr-hn CAlifornia Desiltation Lake Imorovement Proiect
RECOMMENDATION:
8.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 94-12
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY 'COUNCIl. OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ENDORSING APPLICATION FOR AN URBAN STREAMS RESTORATION GRANT
AND INSTITUTING APPROPRIATE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW,
CONDITIONALLY ACCEPTING GRANT IF OFFERED, AND DESIGNATING
CONTRACT MANAGER AND FISCAL AGENT
8.2
8.3
Award contract of $18,500 to J.F. Davidson Associates, Inc. for
Preliminary engineering and the preparation of schematic design
drawings for the Rancho California Desiltation Lake Improvement Project;
Appropriate $19,000 to Account Number 001-163-999-5250 from
General Fund fund balance.
Comoletion and Acceotance of the Construction of the Old Town Temecula Senior
Center - Proiect CSD 92-03
RECOMMENDATION:
9.1
Accept the construction of the Old Town Temecula Senior Center,
Project No. CSD92-03, as complete and direct the City Clerk to:
File a Notice of Completion, release the performance bond, and
accept a one (1) year Maintenance Bond on the amount of 10%
of the contract;
Release the materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after the
filing of the Notice of Completion if no liens have been filed.
"' City Council Minutes Febmaw 8. 1994
10. Fee Credits for Paloma Del Sol Park
RECOMMENDATION:
10.1
Approve an initial fee credit of $500,000 for Kernper Community
Development Company for the construction and dedication of Paloma
Del Sol Park.
Out-of-State Travel Plans
Mayor Pro Tem Stone asked that the allocations for Sister City trips be approved by
the Council prior to travel.
Councilmember Muf~oz asked that this item be continued until more specific cost break
downs and justifications for out-of-state travel are given.
Councilmember Parks suggested approving the travel scheduled for February 6-11
since it has already taken place.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Mut~oz to
continue this Item until more detailed information is obtained.
Councilmember Birdsall stated she would like to consider amending the motion, since
the plans need to be made to attend the National League meeting in Washington, D.C.
City Manager Dixon stated that one problem with continuing this item is that · three
to four month lead is often needed to take advantage of discount airline tickets.
Councilmember Muftoz asked if figures were in at this time for these conferences.
City Clerk June Greek said she can presently fly to Alaska for $3401round trip. If the
deadline of February 16th is missed, the I~rice jumps to 86721round trip.
Councilmember I~luf~oz 'asked if this training can be obtained locally. City Clerk June
Greek explained that in order to continue an advanced educational program for City
Clerk's called an AAE, attendance at an international conference is required.
Councilmember Parks stated based on the numbers ~luoted, he does not have a
problem with approving this travel.
Councilmember Parks withdrew his motion, Councilmember Munoz withdrew his
second.
5
City Council Minutes
February 8. 1994
It was moved by Counciimember Parks, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Stone to approve
staff recommendation to authorize certain travel plans for the National League of Cities,
Public Works Training Seminar and International Institute of Municipal Clerks out of
state travel, and directed staff to return with more detailed information regarding the
remaining travel. The motion was unanimously carried,
· PUBLIC HEARINGS
11.
Old Town SPeCifiC Plan
(Continued from the meeting of 1/25/94)
Councilmember Mufloz asked that in the discussion of this item, language be added to
the plan that addresses the Memorandum of Understanding that has been entered into
with Zev Buffman, with some allowance to implementing this in the future.
Mayor Pro Tem Stone and Councilmember Mut~oz disclosed a potential conflict of
interest and removed themselves from the discussion.
Director of Planning Gary Thornhill presented the staff report and introduced Mark
Broder, of Urban Design Studio, the consultant used to assist the City in the
preparation of this plan.
Mark Broder, outlined the proposed Old Town Specific Plan.
Associate Planner Dave Hogan, reported that since the Planning Commission adopted
the plan last June, a change has been made regarding sidewalk vending carts. He
explained concerns were voiced by merchants that vending carts should not be located
in the public right-a-way. In response to their concerns, staff met with a number of
merchants and revised language is included that will alter the current section to allow
vending carts on developed commercial property only. He also stated that in addition
to the changes in the revisions addendum, staff recommended that the parking district
be expanded to match boundary for the Tourist Retail Commercial Area, and noted a
correction to Section 9 of the Ordinance to read "Subsection D. of Section 19.10".
Mr. Hogan stated he also received a letter from Mr. Rumsey, regarding needs for
additional study regarding circulation due to impacts from the proposed Zev Buffman
project.
Director of Planning Thornhill recommended including in the motion, that a policy
referencing the Memorandum of Understanding with Zev Buffman be added to the Plan.
Councilmember Birdsall expressed her concerns regarding wood walkways, due to past
problems at the Rancho Plaza. Mr. Broder explained with proper installation and
maintenance, problems could be minimized.
6
City Council Minutes Febru,,rv 8. 1994
Mayor Roberts opened the public hearing at 8:06 PM.
Bonnie Reed, 42050 Main Street, spoke in favor of adoption of the Old Town Specific
Ran, stating the community has put forth a lot of effort into this plan and it will be the
foundation of Old Town's future.
Smokey Williamson, 38815 Wayman, Sage, representing the Old Town Temecule Gun
Fighters, spoke in favor of the Old Town Temecula Specific Plan.
RECESS
Mayor Roberts called a brief recess at 8:10 PM to change the tape. The meeting was
reconvened at 8:11 PM, with Councilmember Muf~oz end Stone absent.
Bill Harker, 31130 General Kearny Road, representing the Temecula Town Association,
spoke in favor of the Old Town Specific Plan and asked for Council support. He also
asked the Council to consider extension of the boundaries on both sides of Pujol Street
and the area south of I st Street to 6th Street.
Mayor Roberts closed the public hearing at 8:26 PM.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Birdsall to
approve staff recommendations 11.1,11.2 and 11.3, with noted corrections in Section
9 to read "Subsection D. of Section 19.10."
11.1
Approve the Negative Declaration;
11.2
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 94-13
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ADOPTING THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN
11.3
Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 9405
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ADOPTING PORTIONS OF THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN, AMENDING THE
OFFICIAL ZONING MAP FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA, AND AMENDING CITY
ORDINANCES 90-04, 92-16, AND 93-12
City Council Minutes February 8. 1994
The motion carried by the following vote:
AYES:
3 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Parks, Roberrs
NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 2 COUNCILMEMBERS: Mufioz, Stone
Councilmember Birdsall asked if those currently serving on the Local Review Board will
continue to serve on the Old Town Local Review Board. Associate Planner Dave
Hogan explained that two existing members would continue to serve, two interim
members would have their terms extended to same point,' and the City Clerk would
advertise for positions to fill the vacancies. He stated that nothing would prevent
previous members from rsapplyi~'t'~'fill'the'~acancies.
It was moved by Counciimember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Birdsall to
approve staff recommendation 11.4, with an addition to attachment No. 3 of the
Revisions Addendum to read "to .promote the development of Old Town in · manner
to be consistent with the Memorandum of Understanding entered into by the City
Council and Zav Buffman.
The motion carried by the following vote:
AYES:
3. COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Parks, Robarts
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 2 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Muf~oz, Stone
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Birdsall to
approve staff on 11.5 as follows:
11.5
Direct the City Clerk to advertise for positions on the Old Town Local
ReView Board to begin the process of filling the vacancies on the Board.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Birdsall to direct
staff to refer the requested boundary change to the Planning Commission.
The motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: 3 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Parks, Robarts
NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 2 COUNCILMEMBERS: Mu~oz, Stone
8
City Council Minutes February 8. 1994
RECESS
Mayor Robarts called a brief recess st 8:25 PM to change the tape. The meeting was
reconvened with all members present at 8:38 PM.
¸12.
Plannino Aoolication No. 93-187, Amendment No. I - Aooeal (New Communitv
Lutheran Church)
Councilmember Parks announced he would abstain from this item due to a potential
conflict of interest created by the close proximity of his residence to this site.
Director of Planning Gary Thornhill presented the staff report.
Mayor Robarts asked Director of Public Works Serlet is there is a problem regarding
vehicle stacking. Mr. Serlet explained that concern was expressed due to on-site
traffic, however due to the length of the entrance corridor, this concern has been
adequately addressed.
Councilmember Stone asked if the proponents had agreed not to light the ball field.
Director of Planning Thornhill explained that matter is not part of the proposal and
would have to go back through the public hearing process.
Mayor Robarts opened the public hearing at 8:51 PM.
Louis Todd, 30645 Southern Cross Road, representing New Community Lutheran
Church, spoke in favor of the staff recommendation to deny the appeal. He reported
that the entire church-going community has united in support of this project. He
introduced speakers to address the major areas of concern, which are traffic and
parking.
Paul Yelton, gave a brief history of the problems the church has encountered over the
past several years in its effort to build a church and reported that $104,000 has been
expanded to date.
Fred Cheffay, 40245 Paseo Sereno, discussed the notification procedure and described
how the church hand delivered 70 notices to make sure proper notification occurred.
Karl Waiters, 39798 Amberly Circle, presented a petition containing 1,938 signature
to the City Clerk. He stated the purpose of this petition is to demonstrate to the City
Council the broad base of support for the project. He stated that he obtained 100%
support from the churches in Temecula.
Cris Wenthur, Wenthur & Chaches Attorneys at Law, spoke in favor of approval of the
project, noting that historically churches have enjoyed a favored status relative to
construction of new facilities.
9
City Council Minutes February 8, 1994
Mike Tylman, 28765 Single Oak Drive, spoke in favor of the project stating the
development will help the current erosion and drainage problems on the site.
Vince Didonato, Alhambra Group Architects, landscape consultant, addressed the
positive elements of the landscape plan.
Tim Holt, Holt Group Architects, discussed the advantages of the design elements for
this project and discussed phasing.
RECESS
Mayor Roberrs called a recess at 9:21 PM to change tape. The meeting was
reconvened at 9:22 PM.
Pastor Don C. Presinger, 11446 Kayw0od Circle, Escondido, Interim Pastor of New
Community Church, spoke in support of the project, and stated that it has been his
experience that churches receive preferential treatment in other communities. He
stated that non-profit organizations will be welcome to use the church for their
activities and urged approval of the project. He asked those attending in support of the
church to stand.
Alberta Kovach, 15061 Zieglende Drive, Lake Elsinore, urged approval of the project.
Robert Ford, 29715 Via Verde, spoke in support of New Community Lutheran Church
listing benefits churches provide to a community.
Greg LeBlanc, 39843 Amberly Circle, spoke in favor of the project.
John Augustine, 30345 Colina Verde, spoke against the proposed project and
presented the City Clerk with a petition containing 118 signatures of surrounding
homeowners. He listed his major concerns as traffic and density.
Evelyn Backstrom, 30498 Colina Verde, Windsor Crest, spoke in opposition to the
project, asked that the Council deny this project and return the church to the original
Los Ranchitos Site.
Gary Patch, 43065 Vista Del Rancho, Windsor Crest project, stated the surrounding
homeowners were opposed to Kemper's project on this site due to density generated
traffic and the proposed 400 student day school will cause the same traffic problems.
It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Stone, seconded by Councilmember Muf~oz to extend
the meeting until 10:45 PM. The motion was unanimously carried.
Marsha Slavin, 30110 La Primavera, spoke in opposition to the project and stated she
believed this site would remain an open space passive park. She asked that the church
be refunded for all fees paid out and this project be denied.
Hector Demarchi, 30198 La Primavera, spoke in opposition to the project.
10
City Council Minutes February 8. 1994
RECESS
Mayor Roberts called a brief recess at 10:20 PM to change the tape. The meeting was
reconvened at 10:21 PM.
Betsy Stubbs, 30263 Mira Loma, spoke in opposition to the project and stated she was
under the assumption this property would remain s perk.
Louis Todd, representing New Community Lutheran Church, shaking in rebuttal, urged
approval of the project and asked that the Council adopt a pro-church policy and direct
staff to meet with church leadership to re-evaluate the Public Use Permit process.
Mayor Robarts closed the public bearing at 10:30 PM.
Councilmember Mutioz spoke in favor of the project and stated he feels churches and
schools are appropriate in residential areas wbere they are needed. He stated he
believes all issues brought up have been sufficiently mitigated and this is an appropriate
location for the project.
Councilmember Birdsall stated she appealed the Planning Commission decision on this
issue to allow all concerned citizens the opportunity to voice their opinion.
Councilmember Stone stated be supports this project and feels the City does welcome
churches in Temecula. He said Council and staff have worked hard with surrounding
homeowners to address their needs and mitigate any problems with this project.
It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Stone, seconded by Councilmember Muf~oz to extend
the meeting until 11:25 PM. The motion was unanimously carried with Councilmember
Parks absent.
Councilmember Mur~oz asked Planning Director Thornhill to explain why staff believes
this is an appropriate site for this project. Mr. Thornhill explained an advantage of the
site is very good buffering with a 1/4 mile distance and an up-hill elevation. Ha noted
another advantage is being located on Pauba Road, an arterial, which will be able to
carry the required traffic.
Councilmember Birdsall stated that under the Conditions of Approval, Item 44, pg 19,
the Rancho California Water District concurrence is not listed. Director of Planning
Thornhill stated that would be added.
3,3.
City Council Minutes
It was moved by Councilmember Mufioz,
approve staff recommendation as follows:
seconded by
Mayor
February 8. 1994
Pro Tem Stone to
12.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 94-14
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DENYING
THE APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION TO APPROVE
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 93-O187, AMENDMENT NO. 1, AND
APPROVING THE PROJECT TO CONSTRUCT A CHURCH AND ASSOCIATED
FACILITIES TO BE CONSTRUCTED IN RVE {5) PHASES TOTALLING
APPROXIMATELY 43,197 SQUARE FEETOF BUILDING AREA LOCATED ON
THE NORTH SIDE OF PAUBA ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 2,500 FEET EAST OF
THE INTERSECTION OF YNEZ AND PAUBA ROADS ON A PORTION OF
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 945-050-004
The motion was unanimously carried with Councilmember Parks abstaining.
RECESS
Mayor Roberrs called a recess at 11:09 PM. The meeting was reconvened at 11:25 PM with
all members present.
13. Adootion of Temecula Municioal Code
Mayor Roberrs opened the public hearing at 11:25 PM. Hearing no requests to speak,
Mayor Roberts closed the public hearing at 11:25 PM.
It was moved by Councilmember Muf~oz, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Stone to
approve staff recommendation as follows:
13.1
Conduct a public hearing to consider adoption of the Temecula Municipal
Code and the following secondary codes:
A. Riverside County Ordinances adopted by reference;
B. Uniform Buildino Code, 1991 Edition with appendices in
California State Amendments.
C. Uniform Buildino Codes Standards, 1991 Edition
D. Uniform Mechanical Code 1991 Edition, with appendices in
California State Amendments.
E. Uniform Plumbinq Code, 1991 Edition, with appendices in
California State Amendments.
F. Uniform Administrative Code, 1991 Edition.
12
City Council Minutes February 8. 1994
Ge
Uniform Code for the Abatement of nannero.~ Buildir~s, 1991
Edition.
Uniform Housina Code, 1991 Edition; and
Uniform Swimmina Pools. Sea and Hot Tub Code, 1991 Edition.
13.2
Read by title only aod_aclopt an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 94-03
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ADOPTING THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE
The motion was unanimously carried.
COUNCIL BUSINESS
14. Stipulated Judgment Effectino Temecula RedeveloDment Aoencv
15.
It was moved by Councilmember Mu~oz, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Stone to
approve staff recommendation as follows:
14.1
Approve and authorize the City Attorney to execute the "Interim
Stipulation" in the case entitled Dawes v. City of Temecula, Riverside
Superior Court Case No. 194468MF (consolidated with 194948.)
The motion was unanimously carried.
Lease of City Owned Property at 27612 Jefferson Avenue
Assistant City Manager Woody Edvalson presented the staff report.
Mayor Roberts asked if a provision is included in the lease which would allow only "on-
site parking". Director of Planning Thornhill stated this would be conditioned to allow
only on site parking.
It was moved by Councilmember Mur~oz, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Stone to
approve staff recommendation as follows:
15.1
Approve the attached lease between the City of Temecula and Gary
Michael Craig for use of City property at 27612 Jefferson Avenue.
The motion was unanimously carried.
13
Ciw Council Minutes
16.
Febmew 8. 1994
Specific Plan No, 164. Amendment No. ~ (PA93-0145)Rorioauoh
Staff requested that this item be continued for two weeks.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Mui~oz to
continue this item to the meetjng~fJ:-ebruary 22, 1994.
The motion was unanimously carried.
CITY MANAGER REPORT
None given.
CITY ATTORNEY REPORT
None given.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
None given.
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Councilmember Mufioz, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Stone to adjourn at
11:35 PM to a meeting on February 22, 1994, 7:00 PM, Temecule Community Center, 28816
Pujol Street, Temecula, California. The motion was unanimously carried.
ATTEST:
Ron Roberts, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
14
ITEM
NO.
3
RESOL~ON NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA ALTOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND
DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
THE C1TY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE,
D~ AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A have been
audited by the City Manager, ~nd that the same are hereby allowed in the mount of
$848,280.43
Section 2. The Ci~ Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution.
AFFROVED AND ADOFrED, this 8th day of March, 1994.
ATTEST:
Ron Roberts, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
Resos 06 I
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
crrY or 7 vmCULA)
I, June S. ~, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby do certify that the
foregoing Resolution No. 94- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the
City of Temecula on the 8th day of March, 1994 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: 0
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 0
COUNCK,MEMBERS: None
COUNCILlVrF~MBERS: None
COUNCK,MEMBERS: None
June S. Greek, City Clerk
P,~o, 06 2
CITY OF TEMECULA
LIST OF DEMANDS
02/17/94 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
02J24/94 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
03/08/94 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
02/24/94 TOTAL PAYROL.~
18~,741
12~3,40e. Se
1050,125.33
Sl 15,003.80
TOTAL HST OF DEMANDS FOR 03/08/94 COUNCIL MEETING:
DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND:
CHECKS:
031 GENERAL 1414,206.23
103 GAS TAX tl8,4~1.~0
120 DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FUND 10.00
t90 TCSD 126,Tse.1e
t91 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A - 13,111.72
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 818,08e.04
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 12,24&22
194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 10.00
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ (CIP) I17~0
250,.... TCSD-CIP t06.24
30. SELF-INSURANCE
310 VEHICLES S233./7
320 INFORMATIONS SYSTEMS 16,380.14
330 COPY CENTER 1281
340 FACIUTIES 1891.03
380 RDA-DEBT SEFNICE 10.03
PAYROLI~
031 GENERAL (PAYROLL)
103 GAS TAX (PAYROLL) ~e.e4.1e
190 TC~D (PAYROLL) 115.82/.21
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A (PAYROLL) 1435.06
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C (PAYROLL) $1,719.94
300 8ELF-INSURANCE (PAYROLL) 1552.34
320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS (PAYROLL)
330 COPY CENTER (PAYROLL) Me~S2
340 FACIUTIES
TOTAL BY FUND:
PREPARED BY KARMA MCINTYRE
I, ,HEREBY CER11FY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
MARY JANE MCLARNEY, RNANCE OFRCER
I,
h~..,~LD E. BRADLEY, INTERIM CITY MANAGER
, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE ANO CCRll;CT.
llt5,003,03
CITY OF TEMECULA
LIST OF DEMANDS
02117/94 TOTAL CHECK BUN:
02/24/94 TOTAL CHECK BUN:
03/08/94 TOTAL CHECK BUN:
02124/94 TOTAL PAYROLL:
$115,003.60
TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 03/08/94 COUNCIL MEETING:
DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND:
CHECKS:
001 GENERAL $414,286.23
1 O0 GAS TAX $18,4~1.50
120 DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FUND I0.00
190 TCSD $26,75~.16
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A $5,t t 1.72
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B S18,0e~.04
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C $2,246,22
194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D $5.00
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PRQJ (CIP) $17,989.50
250 TCSD-CIP $58.~,4
280 RDA-CIP $225,060.75
300 SELF-INSURANCE $333.04
310 VEHICLES $233.77
320 INFORMATIONS SYSTEMS $5,380.14
330 COPY CENTER $281
340 FACILITIES
380 RDA-DEBT SERVICE $5.00
PAYROLL:
001 GENERAL (PAYROLL) $78,851.92
1 O0 GAS TAX (PAYROLL) $18,954.1 e
190 TCSD (PAYROLL) $15,827.21
1 gl TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A (PAYROLL) $435.06
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C (PAYROLL) $1,715.94
300 SELF*INSURANCE (PAYROLL) $552.34
320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS (PAYROLL) $1,193.69
330 COPY CENTER (PAYROLL) $583.52
340 FACILITIES r/79.76
TOTAL BY FUND:
PREPARED BY KARMA MCIN
I, EBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TBUE AND CORRECT.
I, "'~'~'~ ~L/.4 , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
RONALD E. BRADLEY, INTERIM CITY~(~R
$115,003.60
$848,280.43
VOUcP""' PAGE
O;t/1 15:/,6
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
100 GAS TAX FUND
190 CONNUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
210 CAPITAL IIqPROVENENT PROJ FUND
250 CAPITAL PROJECTS - TCSD
280 REDEVELOPt4ENT AGENCY -
300 INSURANCE FUND
310 VEHICLES FUND
320 INFORNATIOR SYSTENS
330 COPY CENTER FUND
:~0 FACILITIES
TOTAL
aT
38,/*22.20
5,286.01
1/~,977./,2
2,868.92
18,069.0~
1,536.29
3,311.97
36.2/,
2,808.75
176.15
1,3~.80
~8.01
VOUCHRE2
02/17/94
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUNBER
13729
13730
13731
13735
13736
13737
13738
13739
13740
13741
13742
13743
13744
13745
13745
13745
13745
13746
13747
13747
13748
13749
13749
13749
13749
13750
13750
13751
13751
13752
15:46
CHECK
DATE
02/15/94
02/15/94
02/15/94
02/17/94
02/17/94
02/17/94
02/17/94
02/17/94
02/17/94
02/17/94
02/17/94
02/17/94
02/17/94
02/17/94
02/17/94
02/17/94
02/17/94
02/17/94
02/17/94
02/17/94
02/17/94
02/17/94
02/17/94
02/17/94
02/17/94
02/17/94
02/17/94
02/17/94
02/17/94
02/17/94
CITY OF TBECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK HEGZSTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VENDOR
NUNBER
000842
000824
001314
000101
000102
VENDOR ITEN
NANE DESCRIPT[OR
NATIONAL DATE FESTIVAL · 15 T]CI~TS FOR FESTIVAL
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASS REGISTRAT]ON/SCAG/PARKS
ANERICAN PLANNING ASSOC WORKSHOP LAND USE & TRA
GOOD, JANAE
TIPPS, JONI
ACCURATE SIGNS
WARD, PAUL
APPLE ONE
ANERICAN FENCE CO. OF C
000107 ALHAMBRA GROUP
000112 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOC
000120 BICKNELL TRAVEL CENTER
000129 CAL WEST RENTAL CENTER
000137 CHEVRON U.S.A. INC.
000137 CHEVRON U.S.A. INC.
000137 CHEVRON U.S.A. INC.
000137 CHEVRON U.S.A. INC.
000152 CALIFORNIA PARKS & RECR
000155 DAVLIN
000155 DAVLIN
000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS
000177
000177
000177
000177
000184
TCSD REFUND/GOOD, JANAE
NILEAGE RE[NB/TIPPS, JO
B/L REFUND-ACCURATE SIG
BL REFUND/WARD° PAUL
SMALL BUS LOANS LIASON
TEMPORARY FENCE RENTAL
DESIGN SERVICES PER ATT
083855 ANNUAL MEMBERSHI
AIRFARE CHARGE
TRENCHER RENTAL
789-819-697-2 GAS CARDS
789-819-697-2 GAS CARDS
789-819-697-2 GAS CARDS
789-819-697-2 GAS CARDS
AQUATIC FACILITY COURSE
AUDIO TAPE; PLANNING
VIDEO/AUDIO CITY COUNC]
FIELDNAN - FINANCE DEPT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT NISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT U.S. FLAGS; 5X8
GLENNIES OFFICE PRUDUCT CALIFORNIA FLAGS; 5X8
GLENN]ES OFFICE PRODUCT TAX
GTE CALIFORNIA ZNCORPOR gOg-181-1123
000184 GTE CALIFORNIA [NCORPOR 90~-~-8632
000186 HANKS HARDgARE M]SC SUPPLIES AND EQUIP
000186 HANKS HARDYARE N]SC SUPPLIES AND EQUIP
000203 JOBS AVAILABLE, INC. JOE ANN. FOR SR. BLDG [
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
19Q-183-999-5350
001-100-999-5258
001-161-999-5261
190-183-4982
001-140-999-5262
001-199-4056
001-199-4056
280-199-999-5250
190-180-999-52~8
280-199-805-5802
001-161-999-5226
001-161-999-5258
190-180-999-5258
001-110-999-5263
001-170-999-5262
001-161-999-5262
001-162-999-5263
190-180-999-5258
001-161-999-5250
001-100-999-5250
001-140-999-5230
001-140-999-5220
3330-199-999-5242
340-199-999-5242
3330-199-999-5242
320-199-999-5208
320-199-999-5208
190-180-999-5212
190-180-999-5212
001-150-999-5254
ITEM
AII3UNT
60.00
60.00
165.00
45.00
272.40
35.00
35. O0
154.80
145.00
984,62
280,00
35.00
192.23
135.94
74.74
21.63
11
195,00
150.00
701.67
13.50
21,55
118,00
178.00
22,94
606,27
17,17
39,21
12.45
72.00
CRECK
AMOUNT
60.00
60.00
165.00
45.00
272.40
35.00
35.00
154.80
145.00
984.62
28~0
243,65
195.00
851.67
13.50
3330.49
51.66
VOUClr". CiTY OF TENECULA
02/1 15:66 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIOO$
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR iTEN ACCOIJliT
NUNBER DATE NUNBER NN4E DESCRIPTION NUNBER
ITEH
AletiNT
CHECK
ANOUNT
13753 02/17/96 000206 KINKO'S OF RIVERSIDE, i 3 REARS
190-193-999-5320
67.72
13754 02/17/94 000209 L & N FERTILIZER, INC. MISt. PARTS AND EQUIPfiE 190-180-999-5262
14.50
16.50
13755 02117/94 000210 LEAGUE OF CALIF.CITIE$ PLANNERS POCKET GUIDE 001-161-999-5228
24. O0
24.00
13756 02/17/94 000214 LUNCH & STUFF CATERING CATERING 2/15-2/16 CC H 001-100-999-5260
185.00
185.00
13757 02/17/94 000231 NBS/LOWRY, INC. CIVIL DESION & SIJRVEY 210-16&-627-5802
13757 02/17/94 000231 NBS/LOt~!Y, INC. LNtD SURVEYING 210-166-627-5802
170.00
670. O0
540.00
13758 02/17/96 000233 NELSON, SHAgN
REill SKATEBOARD TOUR 210-190-137-5802
12.04
12.04
13759 02/17/96 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH 001-110-999-5260
13759 02/17/96 000269 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH 001-150-999-5260
13759 02/17/96 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH 001-161-999-5220
13759 02/17/96 000269 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH 001-162-999-5262
13759 02/17/96 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH 001-163-999-5228
13759 02/17/96 000269 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH 001-163-999-5260
13759 02/17/96 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH 001-163-999-5261
13759 02/17/96 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH 320-199-999-5242
13~, ~2/17/96 000253 POSTMASTER 926662 EXPRESS MAIL/JAN 190-180-999-5230
13766' 02/17/94 000253 POSTMASTER 926/e62 EXPRESS MAiL/JAN 001-120-999-5230
13760 02/17/96 000253 POSTMASTER 92~2 EXPRESS MAIL/JAN 001-163-999-5230
13760 02/17/94 000253 POSTMASTER 92~662 EXPRESS MAIL/JAN 001-161-999-5230
15.36
40.10
16.60
50.00
10.00
30.00
41.86
21.90
9.95
7~.70
29.90
23.90
225.82
137.45
13761 02/17/94 000254 PRESS-ENTERPRISE CONPAR ADVERTISING JOBS
001-150-999-5256
111.63
111.63
13762 02/17/96 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA MATER 01-06-29610-0 190-181-999-5260
13762 02/17/96 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA MATER MATER USEAGE 190-180-999-5260
13762 02/17/94 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA MATER MATER USEAGE 193-180-999-5260
13762 02/17/94 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA MATER MATER USEAGE 191-180-999-5260
13762 02/17/94 000262 RANCHO CAL%FORN]A MATER MATER USEAGE 193-180-999-5240
13762 02/17/94 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA MATER WATER USEAGE 193-180-999-5260
10.60
1,0~9.80
521.91
97.32
656.60
54.63
2,620.66
13763 02/17/94 000266 RIGHTWAY
RENT ON PORTABLE TOILET 100-16~-999-5238
57.39
57.39
13764 02/17/94 000270 RJN DESIGN GROUP, INC. RJH DESIGN GROUP 250-190-129-5802
13765 02/17/94 000278 SAN DIEGO UNION TRIBUNE BLDG INSPECTOR JOB ANNO 001-150-999-5254
36.26
265.35
36.24
265.35
13766 02/17/94 000285 SIR SPEEDY
13766 02/17/94 000285 SIR SPEEDY
GOLD FOIL STATIONARY; C 001-110-999-5220
TAX 001-100-999-5220
26.97
2.10
13767 02/17/94 000291 SPEE DEE OIL CHANGE & T LOF B&S VEHICLE 310-162-999-5214
13767 02/17/94 000291 SPEE OEE OIL CHANGE & T OIL CHANGE - PUBLIC NOR 310-164-999-5214
20.99
30.70
13768 02/17/94 000294 STATE COHPENSATIOR INS. MORKERS' COHP. FEB 96 001-2370
13~/'~ 02/17/94 00029~ STATE CONPENSATIOR INS. tIIRKERS' CONP. FEB 9~ 100-2370
13 32/17/94 000294 STATE CONPENSATZOR INS. WORKERS' CONP. FEB 9~ 190"2370
7,216.55
4,202.11
2,907.39
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TENECULA
02/17/94 15:46 VOUCHER/CHEC~ REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
~4
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEN ACCC)UNT
NUNBER DATE NI. JNBER MANE DESCRIPTION NUNBER
ITEM
AN(XJt/T
CHECK
ANOUNT
13768 02/17/94 00029~ STATE COMPENSATIN INS. gORICERS' COMP. FEB 9~ 191-2370
13768 02/17/96 000294 STATE COMPENSATION INS. gORKERS* CONP. FEB 94 193-2370
13768 02/17/94 000294 STATE CONPENSATION INS. MORKERS' CCNP. FEB 9~ 300-2370
13768 02/17/94 000294 STATE CONPENSATZON INS. gORKERS' COle. FEB 94 320-Z~70
13768 02/17/94 000294 STATE C(IIPENSATION INS. MORKERS' COle. FEB 94 330-2370
13768 02/17/94 000294 STATE C(IIPENSATIOR INS. IJORICERS' COI4P. FEB 9~ 340-2370
13768 02/17/94 000294 STATE CONPENSATION INS. gORICERS' CCMP. FEB 9~ 001-1182
13769 02117/9~ 000]02 SYSTEN SOURCE, INC. K-O TYPING STAND 340-199-999-5219
13769 02/17/9~ 000302 SYSTEN SOURCE, INC. FREIGHT 340-199-999-5219
13769 02/17/94 000302 SYSTEN SOURCE, INC. TAX 340-199-999-5219
191.98
273.35
19.74
48.24
21.76
292.58
30.56
150.00
.01
11.62
15,202.26
161.63
13770 02/17194 000306 TEMECULA VALLEY PIPE & PVC RED. BUSH.
190-180-999-5212
75.67
73.67
13771 02/17/94 000320 TOgliE CENTER STATIONERS NISC OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-10]-999-5220
13771 02/17/94 000320 TOgtiE CENTER STATIONERS NISC OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-16~-999-5220
13771 02/17/94 000320 TOgliE CENTER STATIONERS NISC OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-163-999-5220
~5.54
37.60
94.~
227.42
13772 02/17/94 000322 UNIGLOBE BUTTERFIELD TR CREDIT FOR TICKETS
13772 02/17/94 000322 UNIGLOBE BUTTERFIELD TR BIRDSALL AIRFARE-D.C.
001-100-999-5258
001-100-999-5258
1377'~ 02/17/94 000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE 2 SETS OF UNIFOR~S CLEA 100-164-999-5243
13775 02/17/94 000326 UNZTOG RENTAL SERVICE UR]FONH RENTAL AND CLEA 190-180-999-5243
13775 02/17/94 000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE UNIFORN RENTAL AND CLEA 190-180-999-5243
13775 02/17/94 000326 UNZTOG RENTAL SERVICE UNIFORN RENTAL AND CLEA 190-180-999-5243
150.00-
451.00
23.00
16.10
18.25
16.10
301.00
73.45
13774 02/17/94 000339 IJEST PUBLISHING CONPANY CA CO AN-GEN IND 8V 001-120-~-5228
72.81
72.81
13775 02/17/94 000350 ELHO, ANTHONY
13776 02/17/94 000359 PARKER, HERRAN
REINB CALBO ANNUAL MTG 001-162-999-5258
REINB SKATEBOARD TOUR 210-190-137-5802
17.40
38.16
17.40 ·
38.16
13777 02/17/94 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 12/30/93-1/31/94 191-180-999-5319
13777 0Z/17/94 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 08/12/93-09/01/93 191-180-999-5319
13777 02/17/94 000374 SOUTHERN CALZF EDISON 09/01/93-10/04/93 191-180-999-5319
13777 02/17/94 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 10/04/93-11/01-93 191-180-999-5319
13777 0Z/17/94 000374 SOUTHERN CALZF EDISON 11/01/93-12102/93 191-180-999-5319
13777 02/17/94 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 12/30/93-01/27/94 191-180-999-5319
13777 02/17/94 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 12/02/93-12/31/93 191-180-999-5319
13777 02/17/94 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 01/05/9~-02/02/94 191-180-999-5319
13777 02/17/94 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 01/05/94-02/02/94 191-180-999-5319
13777 02/17/94 000374 SOUTHERN CALZF EDISON 01/06/We-O2/0]/We 191-180-999-5319
13778 02/17/94 000375 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TEL ~:39-202-4757 JAN JG 001-120-~99-5208
13778 02/17/94 000375 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TEL ~0~-202-4758 JAN RR 001-100-g99-5208
13778 02/17/94 000375 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TEL 909-202-4759 JAN TE 001-162-~99-5208
13778 02/17/94 000375 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TEL f09-202-476~ JAN PB 001-100-~99-5208
13778 02/17194 000375 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TEL ~0~-202-47~8 JAN JS 001-100-~-5208
13778 02/17/94 000375 SOUTHERN CAL]FONNIA TEL 909-202-4770 JAN DD 001-110-~-5208
13778 02/17/94 000375 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TEL 90~-202-5153 JAN GY 001-110-~-5208
13778 02/17/94 000375 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TEL ~0~-202-4751 JAN TS 100-164-~99-5208
48.98
115.29
190.19
161.44
170.68
162.38
161.4x,
32.24
I:~S
196.59
45.~6
53.22
43.16
39.98
68.15
231.65
134.12
58.19
1,38~,06
VOUCHr'''~ PAGE 5
02/1; 15:/,6
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR
NUNHER DATE NUI4BER
13778 02/17/94 000375
13778 02/17/9/* 000375
13778 02/17/9/* 000375
1377'8 02/17/9/, 000375
13778 0Z/17/94 000375
13778 02/17/9/, 000375
137"78 02/17/9/, 000375
13778 02/17/9/, 000375
13778 02/17/94 000375'
13778 02/17/9/, 000375
137'/'9 02/17/94 000387
13780 02/17/94 000398
13781 0Z/17/9/, O00/,Og
13781 02/17/9/, 000/*09
13781 02/17/94 000/,09
13781 02/17/94 00040~
13781 02/17/9/, 000/*0~
137'/"'~2/17/94 000/,27
137~ j2/17/94 000/*27
13783 02/17/94 000/,82
1378/, 02/17/94 000519
13785 02/17/9/, 000521
1378~ 02/17/9A 000526
13787 02/17/9A 000537
13787 02/17/94 000537
13787 02/17/94 000537
13787 02/17/9~ 00053?
13787 02/17/9~ 00053?
13787 02/17/94 00053?
13787 02/17/94 00053?
13787 02/17/94 00053?
13787 02/17/9~ 0O053?
13787 02/17/9A 00053?
13787 02/17/9~ 00053?
13787 02/17/94 00053?
13787 02/17/9/, 00053?
13787 02/17/94 00053?
13787 02/17/9~ 00053?
13787 02/17/94 00053?
13787 02/17/94 0O0537
137~-02/17/94 00053?
13: )2/17/9~ 000537
VENDC~
NH
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TEL
SOUTHERN CAL]FORNIA TEL
SOUTHERN CAL]FORN]A TEL
SOUTHERN CALIFORN]A TEL
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TEL
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TEL
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TEL
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TEL
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TEL
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TEL
CAREER TRACK SEHINARS H
CALIFORNIA HUN]C]PAL
VALLEN SAFETY SUPPLY
VALLEN SAFETY SUPPLY
VALLEH SAFETY SUPPLY
VALLEN SAFETY SUPPLY
VALLEN SAFETY SUPPLY
ARTESIA IMPLEMENT
ARTESIA IMPLEMENT
LEZGHTOR & ASSOCIATES
SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR
STEUART, BRUCE M.
U,C, REGENTS
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI
SOIJTHERN CALIFORNIA
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EOI
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED!
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED!
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI
SOUTHERN CALIFORHIA EDI
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI
CITY OF TEHECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PER/OD$
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
909-202-/.762 JAIl RP
909-202-/.76/, JAN BLAZER
909-202-/.765 JAN BB
909-202-/.767 DEC GT
909-202-/.204 UE
909-202-/.753 BH
909-202-/.75A KH
909-202-/.755 VAN
909-202-/.756 TH
909-202-/.760
MATERIALS FOR '(SO STAFF
HEMBERSHIP MJM & GR
TUIN CARTRIDGE ADAPTER
TERMINAL SPILL KIT 1112
FRE I GHT
TAX
COVERALL U/ATTACHED H0O
REPAIR OF TCED TRACTON
REPAIR OF TCSD TRACTOR
GRADING & MATERIALS TES
MONTHLY APPLICATION OF
PM f'Z1098 (CHURCH)
SAFETY THROUGH HAINT CL
12/31/~3-1/31/94
12/31/93-1/31/9/,
12/31/93-1/31/94
12/31/93-1/31/94
12/31/93-1/31/94
12/31/93-1/31/94
12/31/93-1/31/9/,
12/31/93-1/31/94
12/31/93-1/31/9~
12/31/93-1/31/9/,
12/31/~3-1/31/94
12/31/~3-1/31/94
12/31/~3-1/31/9/,
12/31/93-1/31/94
11//,/93-1/31/94
12/31/93-1/31/94
12/31/93-1/31/94
12/31/93-1/31/9/,
12/31/93-1/31/94
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-100-;-5208
100-1~.-;-5208
100-1&G-;-5208
001-161-;-5208
001-110-;-5208
190-180-999-5208
190-180-9~-5208
190-180-9f9-5208
320-1W-999-5208
320-1~-~-5208
190-180-~-5228
001-1/,0-~-5226
100-164-999-5218
100-1(~.-~-5218
100-16/,-999-5218
100-1~-999-5218
100-16/*-999-5218
310-180-;-521/,
310-180-999-5214
210-166-627-5802
190-181-ggg-5250
001-162-99~-5250
001-163-999-5261
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
192-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
191-180~999-5319
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
ITEM
AMOUNT
66.08
/*8.33
/,.6
82.69
52.35
/.1
~8.13
37.65
35
37.:3~
/,3.05
75.00
67.96
166.85
7.69
12.93
142.2/,
15.51
89.58
2,356.62
29.00
60.00
100.00
41.76
27.85
20.53
21.02
/,0.69
8.78
40.69
44.48
39.7/,
46.81
45.80
~,5.92
46.75
43.83
18,069.06
48.24
42.18
42.75
118.55
CHECK
A!4OUNT
1,170.01
43.05
75.00
397.67
105.09
2,356.62
29.00
60.0O
100.00
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TENECULA
02/17/96 15:66 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
P~"~6
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NUHBER DATE NLIBER NAME DESCR]PTIOR NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
13787 02/17/9~ 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED! 12/31/93-1/31/9/, 191-180-999-5319
13787 02/17/9~ OOO53? SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI 12/31/93-1/31/9/, 191-180-999-5319
13787 02/17/94 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI 12/31/93-1/31/94 191-180-999-5319
13787 02/17/94 O0053? SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI 12/31/93-1/31/9~ 191-180-999-5319
13787 02/i?/94 OOO53? SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDZ 12/31/93-1/31/9~ 191-180-~q9-5319
13787 02/17/94 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI 11/30/93-12/31/93 191-180-999-5319
13787 02/17/94 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED[ 12/31/93-1/31/96 191-180-999-5319
13787 02/17/94 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI 12/31/93-1/31/96 191-180-999-5319
13787 02/17/94 000537- SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI 12/31/93-1/31/94 191-180-999-5319
37.00
?2.07
50.19
33.21
102.87
28.?4
30.17
31.07
19,26~.60
13788 02/17/94 000587 NUNOZ, NARION.
JANITORIAL SERVICES FOR 190-181-999-5250
200.00
200.00
13789 02/17/94 000662 CITY OF TEMECULA - FLEX REIB FLEX BENEFZT 001-1020
13789 02117/94 000662 CITY OF TENECULA - FLEX REIB FLEX BENEFIT 190-1020
13789 02/17/94 000642 CITY OF TEMECULA - FLEX REIB FLEX BENEFIT 100-1020
13789 02117/94 000662 CITY OF.TEMECULA - FLEX REIB FLEX BENEFIT 300-1020
13789 02/17/94 0006/,2 CITY OF TEMECULA - FLEX REIB FLEX BENEFIT 330-1020
3,050.71
726.66
50.00
21.25
16,25
3,8~.87
13790 02117/94 000666 MALT RANKIN & ASSOCIATE 112-587 EXIT SECTION (L
13790 02117194 000666 MALT RANKIN & ASSOCIATE 978-942 LEGS FOR EXIT S
13790 02117/94 000664 MALT RANKIN & ASSOCIATE 104~ HEX BOLTS
13790 02/17/94 000664 MALT RANKIN & ASSOCIATE 117001 1/4" FLAT MASHER
13790 02117194 000664 MALT RANKIN & ASSOCIATE 117003 5/1&' FLAT MASHE
13790 02117/94 000664 MALT RANKIN & ASSOCIATE 286 SLASH PROOF SEAT
13790 02117/94 000664 MALT RANKIN & ASSOCIATE 280 STURD]-GRIP HANGER
13790 02117194 000(~ MALT RANKIN & ASSOCIATE FREIGHT
13790 02/17/94 000666 MALT RANKIN & ASSOCIATE TAX
190-180-999-5212
190-180-999-5212
190-180-999-5212
190-180-999-5212
190-180-999-5212
190-180-999-5212
190-180-999-5212
190-180-999-5212
190-180-999-5212
130.00
22.00
5,25
1.50
3.00
138,00
90.00
35.48
3.21
428.~
13791 02/17/94 000724 A & R CUSTOM SCREEN PRI SATIN JACKETS
190-183-~-5380
978.37
9?8.37
13792 02/17/94 000?28 RANSEY BACKFLOM & PLUMB BACKFLOg PREVENTION DEV 190-180-999-5250
80.00
80.00
13793 02/17/94 000731 NATIONAL SEMINARS GROUP HOU TO MANAGE PROJECTS 001-163-~-5261
98.00
98.00
13794 02/17/94 000740 PICCA DELl
LABOR RELATIONS TRAININ 001-150-~-5260
101.02
101,02
13795 02/17/94 000745 AT & T - CELLULAR
619-987-1828-1 JAN NJM 001-140-999-5208
10.36
10.36
13796 02/17/94 000734 ELLIOTT GROUP, THE PA 93-0030 MIDNIGHT RD- 001-1270
100.00
100.00
13797 02/17/94 000775 NUNIMETR]X SYSTEMS CORP ANNUAL NAINT
320-199-999-5211
480.00
480,00
13798 02/17/94 000781 ASSOC. OF ENVIROIiEMTAL WORKSHOP/JAN 24, 96 CR 001-161-999-5261
13798 02/17/94 000781 ASSOC, OF ENVIROIdlENTAL MEMBERSHIP/DAVE HOGAN 001-161-999-5226
105.00
80.00
185.00
13799 02/17/94 000797 HARTLEY, BRUCE
REIMB SKATEBOARD TOUR 210-190-137-5802
24.53
24.53
13800 02/17/94 0008~2 NATIONAL DATE FESTIVAL 15 ADMISSION TICKETS 190-183-999-5350
60.00
13801 02/17/94 000873 RORERTS, RONALD H. LOCAL GOVNT CONF IN SAN 001-100-999-5258 87.26
13801 02/17/94 000873 RORERTS, RONALD H. RE[MB CA CONTR CITIES 0 001-100-999-5258 22.60
VOUCH/r" CITY OF TENECULA
02/12 15:66 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEN ACCOUNT
NUIiER DATE NUIiER NAME DESCRIPTION NUliER
13802 02/17/94 000878 BOYS & GIRLS CLUB
DRAg #17 001-1500
13803 02/17/96 000915 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIA NEI4BERSHZP/GREEK, JONES 001-120-999-5226
13804 02/17/94 000919 TENEOULA VALLEY UNIFIED UTILITIES-ELEN SCHOOL P 190-180-999-57.~0
13805 02/17/9/, 0009/*9 GKN RENTALS EOUIP RENTAL 100-16/*-999-5238
13806 02/17/9~ 000965 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CI 2/:r~/9~ NEET]NG 001-100-999-5258
13807 02/17/9~ 000992 RANONA TIRE, INC. LOF B&S VEHICLE 310-162-999-521/,
13808 02/17/94 001002 FIRST INTERSTATE BANK - 5473666/*03910057 JAN $N 190-180-999-57.60
13808 02/17/94 001002 FIRST INTERSTATE BANK - 5473666~03910057 JAN SN 190-180-999-5258
13808 02/17/96 001002 FIRST INTERSTATE DANK - 547'~16~03910115 JAN JG 001-120-999-5258
13808 02/17/94 001002 FIRST INTERSTATE BANK - 5/,734566/,03910149 TS 001-163-999-5260
13809 02/17/94 001029 DATE QUICK INFORMATION DATAQUICK INFORNATION S 320-199-999-5250
13810 02/17/94 001076 lIESTERN MASTE, INC. JANUARY RENTAL 190-180-999-5238
13&~"~'2/17/94 001089 CALIFORNIA DEBT ADVISOR FUND OF DEBT FINANCING/001-1/,0-999-5261
13812 02/17/94 001090 CALIFORNIA DEPT. OF GEN CALIF BOOK OF LISTS '9/* 001-161-999-5228
13813 02/17/94 001142 MARKHAM & ASSOCIATES
13816 02/17/96 001160 PACTEL CELLULAR-LA
13815 02/17/94 001193 CONP USA, INC.
13816 02/17/94 001209 VAULT, THE
ENGINEERING SERVICES AS 190-180-999-5250
6015202
TEAC 1.2 FLOPPY DRIVE
COURIER & HANDLING
13817 02117196 001212 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS 12/16/93-1/18/9~
320-199-999-5208
320-199-999-5221
001-120-999-5250
190-181-999-52/,0
13818 02/17/94 001222 ALPHA COIINN[CAT[ONS, I IqONTHLY SERVICE RENTAL 19()-180-999-5238
13818 02/17/94 001222 ALPHA CClIUNICAT[ONS, I NONTHLY SERVICE RENTAL 001-162-999-5238
13818 02/17/94 001222 ALPHA COIIUNICATIONS, ! NONTHLY SERVICE RENTAL 320-199-999-5238
13818 02/17/94 001222 ALPHA COI,!I. INICATIONS, I IONTHLY SERVICE RENTAL 100-1(~-999-5238
13818 02/17/94 001222 ALPHA COlelUNICATIONS, ! NONTHLY SERVICE RENTAL 001-170-999-52/,2
13818 02/17/94 001222 ALPHA COIIUNICATIONS, ! NONTHLY SERVICE RENTAL 001-140-999-5250
JAN USEAGE CHARGES 320-199-999-5228
13819 02/17/96 001275 COMPUSERV, INC.
13820 02/17194 001292 GRAPHIC EMBROIDERY OF T RECREATION STAFF UNIFOR 190-180-999-5243
13820 02/17/96 001292 GRAPHIC EMBROIDERY OF T TAX 1~0-180-999-52/,3
13821 02/17/9/* 001308 WILSHZRE ESCROM CO. CLOSING COSTS HONDA PRO 280-1700
REIMB SKATEBOARD TOUR 210-190-137-5802
1387"'-02/17/94 001309 RUSE, PHYLLIS
ITEN
AMOUNT
22,z~1.69
39. O0
5,508.29
156.20
54. O0
19.37
9.43
313.63
68. O0
1.00
12.62
455.00
125.00
9.00
127.50
50.84
62.63
20.00
30~. 05
99.00
33. O0
11.00
62.~,
18.33
7.33
13.95
552.00
42.78
1,669.33
28.75
PAGE 7
CHECK
AMOUNT
22,4j~1.69
39.00
5,508.29
156.20
54. O0
19.37
12.62
455. O0
125.00
9.00
127.50
62.43
20. O0
30~. 05
Z31.00
13.95
594.78
1,669.~'5
28.75
VOUCHRE2 '~ 8
021171~ 15:~6
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUNSER
13823
1382,~
13825
13826
13827
13828
CHECK
DATE
0211719A
02/17/9~
02/17/94
02117194
VENDOR
NUNBER
001310
001311
001312
001313
001315
001316
VENDOR
NANE
HILLER, HENRY
HANGUSING, STUART
LANCASTER, CITY OF
FAGAN, HATTHEW
CURRELL, HIKE
STANDARD[, PAT
CITY OF TENEOULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PER]OUS
/TEN ACCOUNT
DESCR]PTION NUNBER
RE!II SKATEBOARD TOUR
REIN8 BOOTS
210'1~0-137-5802
100-1&~,-~-52/,3
URBAN STRUCTURE I~ 001-161-999-5228
PILLOU FOR CHAIR
REZMB FOR BOOTS
REINB FOR NOTANY SERVIC
001'161-999-5220
100-164-999-52./,3
190-180-999-5250
TOTAL CHECKS
ITEN
11.87
89.38
13.50
10.00
95.00
20.00
CHECK
ANOUNT
11.87
89.38
13.50
10.00
95.00
2 0. O0
voucxP, P~ PACE
OZ/?6'. 16:16
CZTY OF TEHECULA
VOUCHER/CHECk: REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
100 GAS TAX FIJND
190 COleIJNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
280 REDEVELONNT AGENCY - CIP
300 iNSURANCE FUND
310 VEHICLES FUND
320 iNFORHATIOR SYSTEHS
330 COPY CENTER FUND
340 FACILITIES
TOTAL
Ale3UNT
55,5:34,.61
9,373.69
8,511.74
242.80
709.93
216,352.00
292.05
57.62
1,866o96
24~ .88
293,409.56
VOUCHRE2
02/24/9/,
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
317202
317202
317202
317202
317202
317202
317202
317202
317202
317202
317202
317202
317202
317202
317202
317202
317202
362227
362227
362227
362227
362227
362227
362227
362227
362227
]62227
362227
362227
362227
362227
362227
362227
362227
13832
13833
1383~
13835
13836
13836
13836
13836
13836
138,36
138,36
1/,:16
CHECK
DATE
0212/,/94
02/24/W,
02124194
02/24/94
02/24/94
02/24/9/,
02/24/9/,
02124194
02/2/,/9/*
02/2/,/94
02/2/,/94
02/24/9/,
02/24/9/*
02/24/94
02/24/9/*
02/24/9~
02/24/94
02/2/,/~4
02/2/*/9/*
02/2/*/9/*
02/2/,/94
.02/24/94
0212/,/9/,
02/2/*/96
0212/,19/,
0212419/*
02/2/,/~4
0212419/*
VENDO~
NUMBER
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
00028;3
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000127
000165
000177
000180
000180
000180
000180
000180
000180
000180
VENDOR
NAME
FIRSTAX (EDO)
FIRST,eX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (F, DO)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (B)D)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
fiRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (El)D)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX CIRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
fiRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IR$)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (ZRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
ADAHS, EVELYN
CALIFORNIAN - LEGAL
FEDERAL EXPRESS
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CONPAN
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC COltPAN
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CONPAN
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CONPAN
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CONPAN
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CONPAN
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CONPAN
CiTY OF TEHECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERICOS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
000/~ SO l
0004~
000/,64
000444
000/~
00~
00~
00~
00~
00~ $TA~
00~ STATE
00~ STATE
000~ STATE
~ STATE
00~ STATE
~ STATE
0~ STATE
00028~ FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
00028~' FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 MEDZCARE
000283 NED Z CARE
000265 NED I CARE
000Z8~ NED Z CARE
00028~ NED l CARE
000283 NED I CARE
00028~ NEDICARE
000283 NED I CARE
00028~ NED I CARE
ADANS,EVELYN/REFUND FEE
1 111 SUBSCRIPTION
NAIL/BUILDING & SAFETY
COPYSETS
SIEMON S-8fO BRACKET
SIENON S~1'50 WIRING
DRA10176-O00 88/110 BLA
AT&T 10516/,867 8P8C DAT
FREIGHT
TAX
SIENON MC4LH-/, COVER -
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-20/0
1 O0 - Z070
1~0-2070
191-2070
193-2070
300-207O
320-2070
330-2070
3~0-2070
001-2070
100-2070
1~0-2070
191-2070
193-2070
300-2070
320-2070
330-Z070
001-2070
100-2070
1~0-2070
191-2070
193-2070
300-2070
320-2070
330-2070
001-2070
100-2070
190-2070
191-2070
193-2070
300-2070
320-2070
330-2070
340-2070
001-2650
190-180-999-5228
001-162-999-5230
001-170-999-5220
320-
320-1~9-~9-52/,2
320-1~-;-5242
320-1~-;-5242
)20-1W-~9-5262
320-1~9-999-5242
ITEM
AMOUNT
1,274.75
285.37
255
7.66
27.47
9.15
10.25
11
3,639./*2
666.67
20,96
25 ,~
55,29
15,71
15,682.19
2,~2.~
2,178.61
82.55
~5.~
~.87
2~6.~
~.27
3,019.65
B6.~
570.7~
17.07
61.29
20.~
54.~
24.~
200.00
/*8.00
18.00
39,05
23.0~
98.5O
16.96
32.30
5.f9
13.26
77.52
CHECK
AHOIJNT
6,8A2.71
200.00
4,8.00
18.00
39.05
16:16
CiTY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECIC
NUMBER
CHECK
DATE
VENDOR
NLIIER
VENDOR
NAHE
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT
NUMBER --
iTEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
k~UNT
13836
13836
13836
13836
13836
13836
02/26/96
02/26/96
02/26/96
02/26/96
02/26/96
02/26/96
000180
000180
000180
000180
000180
000180
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CONPAN
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CCXePAN
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC COlePAll
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CONPAN
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC COlePAR
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC COMPAN
Slrr. JeON HC6LH-6 COVER -
FREIGHT
TAX
S[EMON HC~LH-5 COVER -
FREIGHT
TAX
320-199- 999- 5262
320-199-999-5262
:320-199-999-5262
320-199-999-5262
320-199-999-5262
320-199- 999 - 5262
16.32
5.16
7.28
27.20
6.58
2.11
330.50
13837
13837
13837
13837
02/26/96
02124196
02/26/96
02/26/96
000192
000192
000192
000192
GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLZE
GLOBAL CONI}UTER SUPPL[E
GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLZE
GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLZE
C920(o DOD-120NAA/dqN T 320-199-999-5221
C57'W, DATA STORA6E CUBE 320-199-9~-522.1
FREIGHT 320-199-999-5221
TAX 320-19~-9~-5221
365.25
29.85
9.57
31.15
635.82
13838
13838
13838
13838
13838
13838
13838
13839
138A0
138,4.0
138/.0
138/.0
13840
1384,0
13840
13840
138A0
138~0
1384,0
138~0
'138~0
1384.0
13840
13840
13840
138~0
13860
13841
13861
13841
13841
13841
138~1
1
02/26/94
02/24/94
02/24/~.
02/26/96
02/24/94
02/26/96
02/26/94
02/26/96
02/26/96
02/26/96
02/26/96
02/24/94
02/24/94
02/26/96
02/24/94
02/26/94
02/24/94
02/24/94
02/26/96
02/26/96
02/24/96
02/26/~.
02/26/96
02/24/96
02/26/~.
02/26/96
02/26/~.
02/26/94
02/26/96
02/24/96
02/26/96
02/26/96
02/26/96
02/24/96
02/26/~,
02/24/96
000196
000196
000196
000196
00019~
000196
000196
000216
000266
000266
000266
000266
0002~6
0002/,(>
000266
0002/,6
O002U)
000266
000266
000266
000266
0002/,6
0002/,6
0002~6
0002/,6
000266
000246
000266
000269
000249
000269
000269
000269
000249
000269
000249
IC34A RETIREMENT TRUST
IC34A RETIREHENT TRUST
IC34A RETIREMENT TRI~T
ICll~ ~TIREMENT TROT
ICI4A RETIREMENT TROT
ICMA RETIRERENT TRUST
ICI4A RETIREMENT TROT
LUNCH & STUFF CATERING
PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRF. H
PERS EHPLOYEES' RETIREM
PERS EHPLOYEES' RETIREH
PERS EMPLOYEES' RET]REN
PERS EMPLOYEES' RET]REH
PERS EHPLOYEES' RETIREH
PERS EMPLOYEES' RET]REN
PERS EHPLOYEES' RETIREH
PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM
PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREH
PERS EMPLOYEES' RET]REH
PERS EI4PLOYEES~ RET]REN
PERS EMPLOYEES' RET]REM
PERS EMPLOYEES' RET]REH
PERS EMPLOYEES~ RET]REN
PERS EHPLOYEES' RETIREH
PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREN
PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREH
PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREH
PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
00019~ DEF COle 001-2080
00019~ DEF CCHP 100'2080
00019/, DEF CONP 190'2080
O001(X. DEF COI4P 191-2080
000194, DEF Cae 193-2080
000196 DEF ~ 300-2080
00019~ DEF CCNP 3~0-2080
COUNCIL I,n'G.
001-100-999-52&0
000266 PER REDE 001-2130
000246 PER REDE 100-2130
000Z46 PERS RET 001-2390
000246 PERS RET 100-2390
000266 PERS RET 190-2390
000246 PERS RET 191-2390
000266 PERS RET 193-2390
0002~ PERS RET 300-2390
0002~6 PERS RET 320-2390
000246 PERS RET ~0-2390
0002~6 PERS RET 34,0-2390
000246 SURVIVOR 001-2390
000246 SURVIVOR 100-2390
0002~ SURVIVOR 190-23f0
O00246 SURVIVOR 191-2390
000246 SURVIVOR 193-2390
0002/,6 SURVIVOR 320-2390
000246 SURVIVOR 330-2390
000246 SURVIVOR 360-2390
PETTY CASH 001-100-999-5220
PETTY CASH 001-1~0-999-5260
PETTY CASH 001-150-999-5265
PETTY CASH 001-150-999-5260
PETTY CASH 001-110-999-5258
PETTY CASH 360-199-999-5262
PETTY CASH 001-110-999-5260
PETTY CASH 001-162-999-5261
1,607.93
567.35
/,87.18
36.08
61.66
25.36
50.00
80.00
107.35
107.35
11,165.38
2,695
2,629.78
80.06
28~.39
93.9~
232.35
10~.86
122.01
12.32
12.92
1.~.
.93
.93
12.18
29.57
10.72
6.99
8.00
10.32
12.66
12.00
2,813.56
~.~
17,686.91
VOUCHRE2 Ir'~3
02/26/96 16:16
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
1384,1
13861
138/,.1
1384,1
13861
138~1
1:38~1
13862
13843
1:384~
13845
13846
13847
138~8
13~9
138~9
13869
13850
13851
13852
13852
13853
1385/,
13856
13855
13855
13855
13856
13856
13857
13858
13859
13859
CHECK
DATE
02/26/9/,
02/26/9~
02/26/9/,
02/26/9/,
02/26/96
02/26/9~
02/26/~6
02/26/96
02/26/~
02/26/96
02/26/~
02/26/96
02/26/96
02/26/~
02/26196
02/26/96
02/26/96
02/26/96
02/26/96
02/26/96
02/26/96
02/24/96
02/24/96
02/26/96
02/26/96
02/26/96
02/26/96
02/26/9/.
'02/26/W,
02/26/~.
02/26/96
02/26/96
02/26/96
VENDOR
litleER
000269
000269
000269
000269
000249
000249
000269
000255
000262
000271
000282
000309
000321
000322
000325
000325
000325
000333
000339
000366
000:)68
0003?5
0003?5
000389
000389
000369
000518
000580
000580
CITY OF TEHECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VENDOR ITEN
MANE DESCRIPTION
PETTY CASH PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH PETTY CASH
PRO LOCK &'KEY
EMERGENCY REPAIR
RANCHO CALIFORNIA HATER INSTALL METERS
ROBERT BEIN, ta4 FROST & PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERIN
SCMAF
SOFTBALL REGISTRATION
TEMECULA COPIERS
HASTE COLLECTOR
UBNOSKE, DEBB[E
TUITION REIMB.
UNIGLO6E BUTTERFIELD TR AIRFARE/CONFERENCE MAR
UNITED HAY OF THE INLAN 000325 UN
UNITED HAY OF THE INLAN 000325 UN
UNITED HAY OF THE INLAN 000325 UN
gALL STREET JOURNAL I YEAR SUBSCRIPTION
VEST PUBLISHING COHPANY CALIFORNIA PENAL CODE-9
HARRINGTUN, KEVIN
HARRINGTUN, KEVIN
YORKBOOT REIMB.
WORKSHOP
MCCAVP. AN , LOR I ANN
CPRS CONFERENCE
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TEL 909-202-6206/~E
SOUTHERN CALIFONN]A TEL 909-202-6752/SN
USCM/PEBSCO, (ORRA) 00038~ PT RETIR
USCM/PEBSCO, (ORRA) 000389 PT RET]R
USCH/PEBSOD, (0eRA) 000389 PT RETIR
SIERRA COffiuUTER SYSTEMS CONFERENCE/TH
SIERRA COMPUTER SYSTEMS CONFERENCE/IN
HCLARNEY, HARY JANE 01/26-01/28 CALED CONE
DEL RIO CARE AMIHAL HOS VETERINARY K'9
PHOTO I~ORKS
PHOTO tJORKS
MISC. FlU4 AND PROCESSI
OPEN P.O. FOR FILM, SLI
ACCOUHT
NIJHBER
100-166-;-5218
lf0-180-;-5220
300- lW-~-5207
3~0-1~-;-5262
001-19f-60?0
001 - 100-~-5265
001 - 100-999-5258
190-181-999-5212
001-1280
001-166-~-56;Z)
190-183-;-5380
001-171-;-5217
001-150-;-5259
001-100-;-5258
001-2120
100-2120
1~0-2120
001-1~0-;-5228
001-170-;-5262
W0-180-;-5263
1~0-180-~;-5258
1~0-180-;-5258
001-110-;-5208
1~0-180-;-5208
001-2160
100-21~
190-2160
320-1~-~-5258
001-160-;-5258
001-1~0-;-5258
001-170-;-5327
001-171-;-5250
1~0-180-;-5301
ITB
AMOUNT
9.~
6.31
33.62
5.39
.12
18.36
13.00
180.~
10,360.00
160.00
613.00
125.10
3~.~
~.10
1.53
16.87
169.00
~.16
6.50
62.17
112.~
175,00
'175.00
5.B
CHECK
NeOUNT
186.71
180.00
10,360.00
160.00
613.00
125.10
380.00
102.50
192.79
113.01
63.50
12T.00
339.26
350.00
6,00
33.65
VOUCH~ PAGE
02/24 16:16
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR
NUNBER DATE ~ER MANE
13859 02/26/96 000580 PHOTO gORKS
13860 02/26/96 000622
BANTA ELECTRIC - REFRIG
13861 02/26/96 000663 ZAPMO
13862 02/26/96 000702
13863 02126196 000815
1386~ 02/26/9~ 0008~7
13864 02/26/96 000837
13865 02/26/96 0008~5
13866 02/26/96 000905
13867 02/26/96 000907
13867 02/26/96 000907
13~/....02/26/96 000974
1:38L J2/26/96 000981
138459 02/24/96 000981
13870 02/Z~/96 00104,7
13870 02/26/96 001067
13870 02/26/96 0010/,7
13870 02/26/96 0010~7
13870 02/2~/~ 001~7
13870 02/2~/~ 001~7
13870 02/2~/g~ 001~7
1~70 02/2~/~ 001~7
13870 0~2~/~ 001~7
138~ 02/2~/g~ 001~7
138~ 02/2~/~ 001~7
138~ 02/26/9~ ~1~7
13870 02/26/~ ~1~7
138~ 02/26/~ 001~7
13871 02/26/~ 001056
13872 02/24/96 001065
13872 02/26/;~. 001065
13872 02/26/W, 001065
13872 02/26/W, 001065
13872 02/26/94 001065
13873 02/26/96 001072
13~ J2/26/96 001120
CADDY GRAPHICS
RCNLEY, CATHERINE
CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TA
CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TA
NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITI
TEMECULA SHUTTLE SERVZC
RANCHO CAR klASH
RANCHO CAR MASH
RUIZ, CRAIG
R,H,F, [iC
R,H.F,
BOAT TECH HARINE & SKI
BOAT TECH MARINE & SKI
BOAT TECH MARINE & SKI
BOAT TECH MARINE & SKI
BOAT TECH ItSRIME & SKI
BOAT TECH liARIll & SKI
BOAT TECH MARIll & SKI
BOAT TECH MARINE & SKI
BOAT TECH HAR[NE & SKI
BOAT TECH MARINE & SKI
BOAT TECHItAItlNE & SKi
BOAT TECHMAR[HE & SKi
BOAT TECH lIARIRE & SIC]
BOAT TECH MARINE & SKi
CALIFORNIA BUILDING OFF
CiTY OF TEllCULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM ACCOUNT
DESCRIPTION NU4BER
DEVELOPE &IXJNT 001-161-999-5250
INSTALL CaeERCIAL ELEC 100-164-999-5260
199~ CLASS A2 lllIERSHI 001-162-999-5226
TYPESETTING & GRAPHICS 1~0-183-~-5370
CLASS ]NSTRUCTOR/80X 190-183-999-5.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'~0
000837 GARNISHMENT 001-2140
O00837GARNISHNENT 100-2160
CONFEHENCE/NARCH 12-15 001-100-999-5258
TRANSPORT FROR SAN DIEG 001-100-999-5258
CAR gASH 310-16~-999-5216
CAR MASH 310-180-999-5216
TUITIOR REIND.
001-150-999-5259
REPAIR AND SECERTIFICAT 001-170-999-5215
REPAIR AND RECERT[FICAT 001-170-999-5215
REAR TIRE
FROlIT T l RE
OIL FILTER
lOTOR OIL
BRES; PLUGS
CLUTCH PLATES
SHIFT SHAFT SEAL
CLUTCH RELEASE BERRINGS
VALVE COVER GASKET
CAM PLUGS
CLUTCH COVER OA$1G~T
FREIGHT
TAX
001-170-~-5216
001-170-99~-5216
001-170-999-5216
001-170-~-5216
001-170-9~9-5216
001-170-~-5216
001-170-999-5216
001-170-W9-5216
001-170-~-5216
001-170-999-5216
001-170-~-5216
001-170-999-5214
001-170-f~-5216
001-170-999-5216
RENB4 CLASS [ MENBERSHI 001-162-~-527.6
USCNIPEBSCO (DEF. COlto. 001065 DEF CClIP 001-Z080
USOI/PEBSCO (DEF. CORP. 001065 DEF CONP 100-2080
USCH/PEBSCO (DEF. CORP. 001065 DEF CONP 190-2080
USCH/PEBSCO (DEF. COHP. 001065 DEF CONP 300-2080
USON/PEBSCO (DEF. CORP. 001065 DEF COHP 320-2080
BANK OF AMERICA NT & SA
ESOY, VITO P. JR..
REII49URSE NDA BOND/CDBG 280-1060
ENGINEERING SERVIP;S 100-16~-999-5248
ITEM
AMOUNT
8.57
712.33
100.00
100.00
128.00
585.00
50.00
41.62
16.00
400.00
180.16
136.75
155.20
108,66
5.95
11.80
8.00
67.50
3.00
2.55
21.60
13.00
5.6O
272.50
7.50
31.20
150.00
3,035.~
197.98
156.32
3.~6
312.50
216,352.00
650.00
CHECK
AI~3UMT
57.39
712.33
100.00
100,00
128,00
187.92
585.00
50.00
57,62
600.00
316.91
716.06
150.00
3,705.~2
216,352.00
650.00
VOUCHREZ
02/24/94
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
13876
13876
13876
13876
13876
13876
13876
13877'
13878
13879
13880
13881
13882
13883
CHECK
DATE
02/24/~
02/24/94
02/24/94
02/24/94
02/24/94
02/24/94
02/24/94
02/24/94
02/24/94
02/24/94
02/24194
02/24/94
02/24/94
02/24/94
02/24/94
VENDOR VENDOR
NUMBER NAJ~
ENTERTAINNENT PtlLICATI
001193 CCl4P USA, INC.
001193 COI4P USA, INC.
001193 CCI4P USA, INC,
001193 COtqP USA, [NC.
001193 CONP USA, INC,
001193 COHP USA, INC,
001193 COHP USA, INC.
001243 PALMGUIST, NARY
001305
PUBLIC RETIREMENT JOURN
001317 DAVIS, HARY
001318 140LFF, MIKE
001319 ROGERS, IRENE
001320 CRCNE-PELLETIER, JULIE
001321 CITI TECH
CITY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEN
DESCRIPTION
REINB. TEEN FIJ~DRAISER
179862 VINDO~S 3.1
211072 UORDPERFECT 6.0
168071 QUATTRO PRO 5 UI
216A20 PARADOX 4.5 gIN
ACCOUNT
MUNBER
190-183-999-5320
001-171-999-5221
001-171-999-5221
001 - 171-999-5221
001 - 171-999-5221
207474 lIARVAlID GRAPHICS 001-171-999-5221
FREIGHT
TAX
CLASS INSTRUCTOR/80X
RETIRENENT TRAINING/OL
INSTRUCTOR FEE/80~
BOOT REI!4BURSENENT
CPR$ CORFERENCEI2/4-2/5
CPRS CONFERENCE/2/4-2/5
NAINTENANCE REPORT
001-171-999-5221
001-171-999-5221
190-183-999-55"$0
001 - 150-999-5261
190-183-999-5330
100-164-999-5243
190-180-999-5258
190-180-999-5258
001-163-999-5224
TOTAL CHECKS
ITB!
222.~0
87.77
2?9.12
38.80
135.39
2~,5.78
7.50
60.98
204.40
135.00
43.20
89.38
71.93
28.50
CHECK
AIIOLJNT
222,40
855,34
204,40
135,00
43,20
89,38
88.~
..Z,1~93
,/50
293,409.56
VOUC./~ PAGE 3
02/, 15:08
CITY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERICI)S
FUND TZTLE
001 GENERAL FUND
100 GAS TAX FUND
190 COIIUIZTY HERVICES DISTRICT
210 CAPZTAL iMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND
280 REDEVELOP~ENT AGENCY - C]P
320 ZNFORNATZOR SYSTEMS
TOTAL
AllGUIlT
320,329.42
3,832.00
3,27Q.QO
14,677.53
5,900.00
2,116.38
350,125.33
VOUCHRE2 ~ 1
02/26/96 15:08
CiTY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PER]ODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
CHECK
DATE
VENDOR
NUNBER
VENDOR
NANE
ITEN
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
iTEM
A!e3UNT
CHECK
A/e3UNT
13887
13887
13887
13888
13889
13889
13889
13889
13889
13889
13889
13889
13890
13890
13891
13892
13892
03/08/94
03/08/94
03/08/94
03/08/94
03/08/94
03/08/94
03/08/94
03/08/94
03/08/94
03/08/9~
03/08/9~
03/08/94
-03/08/94
03/08/94
03/08/94
03/08/9~
03/08/94
000161
000161
000161
00016~
000178
000178
000178
000178
000178
000178
000178
000178
000202
000202
000251
000252
000252
EDEN SYSTENS, INC.
EDEN SYSTENS, INC.
EDEN SYSTEHS, INC.
ESGIL CORPORATION
GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO
GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO
GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO
GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO
GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO
GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO
GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO
GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO
J.F. DAVIDSON ASSOCIATE
J.F. DAVIDSON ASSOCIATE
PLANNING CENTER, INC. T
POLYCRAFT, INC.
POLYCRAFT, INC.
UPI)ATI~) DOCUMENTATION
DATA CONVERSION
ACUCOBOL RUNTIME; 2-8 U
320-1f9-999-5211
320-199-~9-5211
320-1~9-f9~-5211
JAN PLAN CHECKS
001-162-~99-5248
686DX-66 HORKSTATION
ItSDOS 6.2
4M8 SINH HEMORY CHIP SE
210Nil IDE HARD DRIVE
TAX
TAX
TAX
TAX
001-171-~99-5606
001-171-~99-5221
320-199-999-5221
320-1~9-999-5215
001-171-~99-5&0~
001-171-999-5221
320-199-999-5221
320-1~9-~99-5215
DESIGN SERVICES FOR RAN 210-190-137-5802
CREDIT EXTRAS 210-190-137-5802
GENERAL PLAN CONTRACT A 001-161-~99-5268
2 7/8" TEHECULA CITY SE 001-171-999-5296
TAX 001-171-999-5296
330.00
630.00
289.00
3,257.85
1,856.00
74.00
600.00
205.00
143.84
5.74
46.50
15.88
7,525.00
225.00-
7,119.61
1,075.00
83.31
1,249.00
3,257.85
2,946.96
7,300.00
7,119.61
1 'I1
13893
13894
13894
13894
13894
13894
13894
13894
13894
13894
13894
13894
13895
13896
13897
13897
13898
13898
13899
13899
03/08/94
03/08/94
03108/94
03/08/94
03/08/94
03/08/94
03/08/94
03/08/94
03/08/94
03/08/94
03/08/94
03/08/94
03/08/94
03/08/94
03/08/94
03/08/94
03/08/94
03/08/94
03/08/94
03/08/94
000276
000406
000406
000606
000~06
000406
000406
000406
000406
000/,06
000/,06
000/,06
0004.81
000606
0008~3
0008~3
00088
000883
000955
000955
PURKISS ROSE
RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHER]F
RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF
RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF
RiVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF
RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF
RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF
RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERZF
RIVERS]DE COUNTY SHERIF
RiVERSiDE COUNTY SHER[F
RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHER[F
RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHER[F
GEOTECHNICAL & ENVIRONN
RIVERSIDE COUNTY ADMIN.
MCDAN[EL ENGINEERING CO
MCDANIEL ENGINEERING CO
NONTELEONE EXCAVATING
MONTELEONE EXCAVATING
RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF
RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF
20 YEAR MASTER PLAN
LAW ENFORCEMENT
LAW ENFORCEMENT
LAW ENFORCEMENT
LAW ENFORCENENT
LAW ENFORCEMENT
LAW ENFORCEHENT
LAW ENFORCEMENT
LAW ENFORCEMENT
LAW ENFORCERENT
LAW ENFORCEMENT
EXTRA DUTY
tDECEMBE
fDECEMBE
tDECEMBE
q)ECEMBE
rDECEMBE
~ECENBE
~ECEMBE
q)ECEMBE
tDECEMBE
~ECEMBE
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL S
THIRD & FOURTH GTR ACll
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 0
CREDIT OCT SERV]CES
VIA LORO LANDSCAPING
SLOPE FAILURE ON RANCHO
DEC. PATROL
BIKE PATROL/JAN
190-180-999-5250
001-170-999-5288
001-170-999-5299
001-170-999-5298
001-170-999-5296
001-170-999-52~0
001-170-~99-5262
001-1230
001-170-~99-5291
001-170-~-5281
001-170-~99-5282
001-170-~9-5288
280-1700
001-170-999-5325
210-16&-627-5802
21 O- 166-627- 5802
100-164-999-5402
100-164-999-5602
001-170-999-5326
001-170-999-5326
3,270.00
193,747.81
16,172.18
18,8/,6.32
6,960.03
5,256.56
14,896.32
3,384.45
3,38~.65
14,194,96
2,292.48
605.37
2,400.00
19,028.00
5,522.00
2,628.50'
985.00
975.00
6,018.09
712.20
3,270.00
27~,718.93
2,600.00
19,028.00
2,89~.50
1,960.00'
13900 03/08/94 001007 NPG CORP. MORK ORDER 93-W,-88 - 2 100-16~-999-5402 936.00
VOUCHP, f""
021241 ,5:08
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK
MtJNBER DATE
13900 03/08/W,
13901 03/08/9~
1390Z 03/08/94
13902 03/08/94
13903 03/08/94
VENDOR
NUHBER
001007
0010/6
0012/,6
001246
001288
VENDOR
NAHE
NPG CORP.
REXOR, FREEDNAN, KLEPET
UR$ CONSULTANTS, INC.
URS CONSULTANTS, INC.
SAN DIEGO BUSINESS JOtJR
CITY OF TEHECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERICI)S
ITEH
DESCRIPTION
I, IORK ORDER gJ-94-88 POT
PROF SERVICES FOR JAN 9
CONSULTANT
CONSULTANT
SPONSORSHII- A~ tN ee} mJ
TOTAL CHECKS
ACCOUNT
NUI4BER
100-164.-999-5402
001-130-~-5247
210-165-631-5802
210-165-631-580Z
ITEN
ANOUNT
936.00
1,236.85
996.45
3,487.58
PAGE 2
CHECK
AHOUNT
1,872.00
1,2~6.85
4,484.03
~t,t;O0,O0
350,125.33
VOUCNRE2 ~ 3
02/24/94 15:08
CITY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PER[COS
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
100 GAS TAX FUND
190 CGleeJNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND
280 REDEVELOiqqENT AGENCY - CIP
320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS
TOTAL
AMOUNT
320,329,~2
3,832.00
3,270.00
1~,677.53
5,~00.00
2,116.38
350,125.33
VOUCHER/
,CHECK
NLINBER
13887
13887
13887
13888
13889
13889
13889
13889
13889
13889
13889
13889
13890
13890
13891
13892
13./"-
13893
13894
13894
13894
13894
13894
13894
13894
13894
13894
13894
13894
13895
13896
13897
13897
13898
13898
13899
13899
1
15:08
CHECK
DATE
03/08/W,
03/08/W,
03/08/W,
03/08/94
03/08/94
03/08/94
03/08/94
03/08/94
03/08/94
03/08/94.
03/08/94
03/08/9~
03/08/94
03/08/94
0~/08/9~
03/08/94
03/08/94
03/08/94
03/08/94
03/08/94
03/08/94
03/08/9/,
03/08/94
03/08/94
03/08/94
03/08/94
03/08/9~
03/08/94
03/08/94
03/08/94
03/08/94
03/08/94
03/08/94
03/08/94
03/08/94
03/08/94
03/08/94
03/08/94
VENDOR
HLI4BER
000161
000161
000161
O001be,
000178
000178
000178
000178
000178
000178
000178
000178
000202
000202
000251
000252
000252
000276
000406
000406
000406
000406
000406
000406
000406
000406
0004O6
000406
000406
000481
000606
00084,3
000843
000883
000883
000955
000955
001007
VENDOR
NAME
EDEN SYSTEMS, INC.
EDEN SYSTEMS, INC.
EDEN SYSTEMS, INC.
ESGIL CORPORATION
GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO
GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO
GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO
GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO
GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO
GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO
GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO
GOLDEN STATE TRADING GO
J.F. DAVIDSON ASSOCIATE
J.F. DAVIDSON ASSOCIATE
PLANNING CENTER, INC. T
POLYCRAFT, INC.
POLYCRAFT, INC.
PURKISS ROSE
RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF
RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF
RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF
RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF
RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF
RIVERSIDE COUNTY $HERIF
RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF
RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF
RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF
RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHER[F
RIVERSlOE COUNTY SHERIF
GEOTECHNICAL & ENVIRONM
RIVERSIDE COUNTY ADNIN.
MCDANXEL ENGINEERING CO
MCOANIEL ENGINEERING CO
NONTELEONE EXCAVATING
NONTELEONE EXCAVATING
RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF
RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF
NPG CORP.
CITY OF TEMEOULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERZOOS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
UPDATED DOCUMENTATION
DATA CONVERSION
ACUCOBOL RUNTIf,E; 2-8 U
JAN PLAN CHECKS
4861)X-66 gORKSTAT%ON
MS)OR 6.2
/de SINN MEMORY CHIP SE
2lOMB IDE HARD DRIVE
TAX
TAX
TAX
TAX
DESIGN SERVICES FOR RAN
CREDIT EXTRAS
GENERAL PLAN CONTRACT A
2 7/8" TEMEOULA CITY SE
TAX
20 YEAR MASTER PLAN
LAg ENFORCENENT/I)ECEMBE
LAW ENFORCENENT/1)ECE!IE
LAW ENFONCEENT/DECEMBE
LAR ENFORCEMENT/1)ECLqeiE
LAW ENFONCENENT/!)ECEN8E
LAW ENFORCEMENT/DECEMBE
LAW ENFONCENENT/!)ECEMBE
LAg ENFONCENENT/I)ECENBE
LAW ENFORCENENT/DECEMBE
LAw ENFORCEMENT/1)ECEHBE
EXTRA DUTY
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL S
THIRD & FOURTH QTR ACI[
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 0
CELOIT OCT SERVICES
VIA LOBO LANDSCAPING
SLOPE FAILURE ON RANCHO
DEC. PATROL
BIKE PATROL/JAN
WORK ORDER 9c~-9~-88 - 2
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
320-199-999-5211
320-1f9-99~-5211
320-199-999-5211
001-162-9~-5248
001-171-9~9-5604
001-171-999-5221
320-199-999-5221
320-199-999-5215
001-171-999-5604
001-171-~9~-5221
320-199-F~9-5221
320-199-999-5215
210-190-137-5802
210-190-137-5802
001-161-999-5248
001-171-999-52~&
001-171-999-5296
190-180-999-5250
001-170-~-5288
001 - 170-999-529~
001 - 178-99~-5298
001-170-f99-5294
001-170-999-5290
O01 - 170 -999- 5262
001-1230
001 - 170-9~-5291
001 - 170-999- 5281
001-170-999-5282
001-170-999-5288
280-1700
001-170-999-5325
210-1~:~-627-5802
210-166-627-5802
100-1t4-999-5402
100-164-99~-5402
001-170-999-5326
001-170-999-5326
100-16r,99~-5402
ITEM
AMOUNT
330.00
630.0O
289.00
3,257.85
1,856.00
74.00
600.00
205.00
143.84
5.74
46.50
15.88
7,525.00
225,00'
7,119.61
1,075.00
83.31
3,270.00
193,747.81
16,172.18
18,8~6.32
6,940.03
5,254.56
14,896.32
3,38~.~5
3,38~.45
14,194.96
2,292.~8
605.37
2,400.00
19,028.00
5,522.00
2,628.50-
985.00
975.00
6,018.09
712.20
9~6. O0
PAGE 1
CHE~
ANOUNT
1,249.00
3,257.85
7,300.00
7,119.61
1,158.31
3,270.00
27~,718.F3
2,400.00
19,028.00
2,8913.50
1,960.00
VOUC!IRE2
02/2&/g&
15:08
CITY OF TEHECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIOOS
VOUCHER/
CHECK
HUNRER
13900
13901
13902
13902
13903
CHECK VENDOR VENDOR
DATE NU!,!BER NAIIE
03/08/94 001007 NPG CORP.
03/08/94 0010~6 REXON, FREEDNAN, KLEPET
03/08/94 0012~ URS CONSULTANTS, INC,
03/08/94 001246 URS CONSULTANTS, INC.
03/08/94 001288 -SAN DIEGO BUSINESS JOUR
ITEN
DESCRIPTION
M3RK ORDER 9'~-9~.-88 POT
PROF SERVICES FOR JAN 9
CONSULTANT
CONSULTANT
SPONSORSHIP AD IN GO BU
ACCOUNT
NUNBER
100-1~-999-5~02
001-130-999-5247
210-165-631-5802
210-165-631-5802
280-199-999-525~
ITEH
ANOUNT
936.00
1,;?_36.85
996.~5
3,487.58
3;500.00
CHECK
ANOUMT
1,87'Z.00
1,236.85
4,484.03
3,500.00
TOTAL CHECKS
350,125.:33
ITEM
NO.
4
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
Mary Jane McLarney, Finance Officer
March 8, 1994
City Treasurer's Report as of January 31, 1994
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive and file the City Treasurer's
report as of January 31, 1994.
DISCUSSION: Reports to the City Council regarding the City's investment
portfolio and receipts, disbursements and fund balance are required by Government
Code Sections 53646 and 41004 respectively. The City's investment portfolio is in
compliance with the Code Sections as of January 31, 1994.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
ATTACHMENTS:
1. City Treasurer's Report as of January 31, 1994
2. Schedule of Fund Balances as of January 31, 1994
City of Tamecula
City Treasurer'8 Report
As of January 31, 1994
Cash Activity for the Month of January:
Cash and Investments as of January 1, 1994
Cash Receipts
Cash Disbursements
Cash and Investments as of January 31, 1994
$ 39,959,771
16,258,497
(14,459,789)
$ 41,758,479
Cash and Investments Portfolio:
Type of Investment
Petty Cash
General Checking
Benefit Demand Deposits
Local Agency Investment Fund
Deferred Compensation Fund
Deferred Compensation Fund
Defined Contribution Fund
Trust Accounts-TCSD COPs
Trust Accounts-RDA Bonds
Institution
City Hall
First Interstate
First linerstate
State Treasurer
ICMA
PEBSCO
PEBSCO
Bank of America
Bank of America
Yield
4.359%
2.743%
2.743%
Balance
800
373,417
7,075
26,776,387
258,997
204,947
16,870
1,091,106
13,028,980
41,758,479
(1)
(1)
(1)-This amount is net of outstanding checks.
Per Government Code Requirements, this Treasurer's Report is in compliance with
the City of Ternecula's investment policy and there are adequate funds available
to meet budgeted and actual expenditures of the City of Temecula for the next
thirty days.
Prepared by Tim McDermott, Senior Accoumam
City of Temecula
Schedule of Fund Balances
As of January 31, 1994
Total Assets $
Less: Liabilities
Total Fund Balances
Less: Reserved Amounts (1)
Less: Designated Amounts (2)
Unreserved, Undesignated
Fund Balances $
COITtlTIUrljty
Services Redevelopment
City District Agency
24,074,477 $ 3,671,078 $ 20,441,969
2,969,6d8 740,797 533,152
21,1 04,829 2,930,281 19,908,81 7
5,333,311 1,062,980 5,792,862
8,889,713 1,867,301 14,115,955
6,881,805. $ $ $
Total
48, 187,524
4,243,597
43,943,927
12,189,153
24,872,969
6,881,805
(1) Includes amounts reserved for encumbrances, land held for resale, long-term notes receivable, Iow/mod housing,
and debt service.
(2) Includes amounts designated for economic uncertainty, debt service, and continuing appropriations.
ITEM 5
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY .
FINANCE OFFICER'~
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPC~Y
Meyor end City Count;I/City Maneger
Scott F. Fie~d, ~;ity Attorney
M--rch 1, 1994
Ynez Corridor Sales Tax Agreement and Joint Financing Agreement for
Solana Way Widening
RECOMMENDATION: Approve and authorize the Mayor to sign the following, in substantially
the form presented, subject to approval by the City Manager and City Attorney as to the final
form of the agreements:
"First Amendment to the Agreement between the City of Temecula and Eli Lilly and
Company, an Indiana Corporation regarding Sales Tax Revenues of Community
Facilities District No. 88-12."
2. "First Amendment to Agreement between the City of Temecula and Rancho Mobile
Home Estates regarding Sales Tax Revenues of Community Facilities District No. 88-12
(Ynez Corridor)" and
3. "First Amendment to Joint Financing Agreement Between Community Facilities District
No. 88-12 of the County of Riverside and the City of Temecula"
,,~
DISCUSSION: 1. In order to induce the formation of the Ynez Corridor Community Facilities
District, the City Council approved the use of sales tax revenues generated within the District
to reimburse owners for Special Taxes levied to meet bond payments. However, the Council
directed that the sales tax reimbursement would only be used for improvements of a
community-wide nature. For example, no sales tax reimbursement was made available for
constructing four of six of the lanes on Ynez Road, since these would have been a developer
obligation. The effect of this arrangement means that the District will acquire the facilities
costing approximately $164,527. The property owner will then repay this debt through
special tax payments, consisting of principal and interest on this portion of the Bonds.
2: At the time the District sold Series 1992 Bonds, the only work contemplated to be
R:~genda.rlet~OEB.4ke 1
performed with the Bond proceeds was widening Ynez Road, designing Overland Bridge and
'the Winchester end Jefferson interchange acquiring the Coop property for the Overland Bridge
and $2,000,000 for park acquisition and improvement. However, when the County and
oroperty owner originally epproved the District, a broad list of public improvement was
~.. ~'-;zed. One of these improvements was widening Solana Way from Motor Car Parkway
to Margaret3 .".oad.
Funds are available ire;,- :"'- Bond proceeds to widen Solana Way. The Council has previously
authorized solicitations of D:~. for the widening, and staff will recommend a contractor to
construct the project at the Marc;-, c. ' ;.~4meeting. However, in order to use Bond proceeds.
two existing agreements must be amen~=~.
First, the Sales Tax Agreement for the property owh~ ' Rbutting the Solana Way widening must
be amended to permit widening Solana Way without sa~.' ~ax reimbursement. The attached
agreement with Eli Lilly and Rancho Mobile Home Estates prG, !~e that Solana will be widened
with Bond proceeds, the property owner will not be reimbursed for the widenin~ v..,;~ Sale~
Tax Revenues.
3. Second, the Joint Financing Agreement between the City and County establishes the work
that may be performed with Bond proceeds. The approved work is set forth in Exhibit B to
the Agreement. Consequently, the Amended Financing Agreement add a new Exhibit B, which
includes the Solana Way widening' for the list of approved expenditures.
ATTACHMENTS: Amendment to Joint Financing Agreement between City and County re:
CFD88-12
JSG
R:%agende.mt~OES-Ree 2
FIRST MIXNI]2~TOTEaJOINTFINANCINC
AGItFaeINT BETWI3N COMISJNX~ FACILITIES
DISTRICT NO. 88-13 OF THR COUNTY'OF RIVERSIDE
AND TH] CITY OF TEMICT]IA
THIN FZIiSTAMENDMENTTOT]~JOINTFZNANCING AgReEMENT
(the "Amendment") is lade an4enterel into as of February__,
1994, by and between CO!~ITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-12 OF
TEl COU!rZY OF itlVEUIDE (YNEZ CORRIDOR), a lqally constituted
governmental entity organlead and exietin~ pursuant to Division
2, Part 1, Chapter l.S Of Title S of the California Government
Code (heroinafter 'CFD No. 88-12u) and the CITY OF TEMBCULA, an
incorporated municipality (heroinafter wClTYu).
A. On or about August 1989, the Count~ Of Riverside issued
the "Public Report on the Proposed Community Facilities DiStrict
No. 88-12 of the County Of Riverside (Yne2 Corridor)". Exhibit C
to the Public Report sets forth the facilities that may be
constructed with the bonded indebtedness of the District.
Included within Exhibit C is the extension of Solaria Way from
Ynel Road to Margarita Road as shown on Exhibit A~ attached
hereto.
B. On April 3, 1990 the Board of Supervisors canvassed the
election results of the special alectiol~held o~ March 23, 1990,
and determined that the qualified electors within CFD No. 88-12
voted by a majorit in excess of two-thirds of the votes
approve CFD 88-12 Incurring bonded indeb~edness in cast to
an aggregate
principal amount not to exceed 280,000,000 and the lev~ of the
Special Tax to pa~ debt service on any bonded indebtedness
incurred, to pay the administrative expenses of CFD 88-12 =o the
extent allowed by the maximum rate cf the Special Tax.
C. In anticipation of issuing and selling an initial
series of bonds (the neerite 1992 Dondew) to pay for the
acquisition of certain Road Facilities, and to pay for the
design, engineering and oonstruo~on of certain Road Faclli~ies,
CFD 82-12 end the City entered into a Jol~t Financing Agreement
pursuant to Government Code Sections 53316.2, 53316.4 and
53316.6, dated as of April 1, 1992.
D. CFD NO. 88-12 islued the Series 199~ O~nds to pay for
acquisition of certain road facilities, as identified on ~xhiblt
S to the Joint Ftnancln~Agreement and to pay for the design,
engineering and construction of certain road facllit~es as
identified on Exilebit S to the Joint Financing Agreement.
I. The ~oint Financing Igreement established the
improvements that ~e~e to be c~nstructed with the proceeds o~ the
Series 1992 ~nds. The Solana Way extension was not included as
one of the improv~ments to be construeted pursuant to the 3oint
F inane ing. &grewsent.
F. Pursuant to the Saint Finanatng Agr.sment, the City has
contracted for the · isition# design and construction of the
road ~acilities descr~b~ in Exhibit B to the ~oint Financing
Aereemen~. Sufficient savt s have been realized in the
construction of the road ~ac~lities
to persit construction o~ the
Solana Way extension.
Now, THEREFORE, in consideration of mutual covenants
heroinafter contained, the par~las agree that the Joint Financing
Agreement shall be amended as fallOWes
1. The Road Facilities as idm~tified i~ Exhibit B to
the Joint Financing lgTeesent are hereby amended by replacing
Exhibit I to the ~oint Financin~ Xgresmen~ with Xxhibit B ~o this
lmendment.
2. All other terms and conditions o~ the Joint
Financin~A~reement dated as of April 1, ~992, will rmi~ the
same.
IN WXTNES2 WHEREOF, the parties have caused this
~greement to be executed as o~ the date firsU above written.
CONI(UNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO.
82-12 OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
Bye.
Chairman of the Board oZ
Supervisors, Ix Ofticio the
Legislative Body of Conunity
Facilities District No. 88-12
of the County of Riverside
ATTEST
By~
Clerk'of the Board oZ
Supervisors, ZxOfficiothe
Legislative Body of Community
Facilities Dim~rictNo. el-X2
of the County of ltivsrsids
CITY OF TEMECULA
Date:
Byt
Ron Roberrs, Nayor
ATTEST:
By:
aune S. Gree3c, City Clerk
Approved as to form:
By:
Scott F. Field, City Attorney
3
FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF
TEKECULA AND ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, AN INDIANA
CORPORATION, RSGARDING SALES TAX REVENUES OF
COMMUNITY FACILITIR8 DISTRICT NO. 88-12 (YNEZ
CORRIDOR)
THIS AGIt~EM~NT is made and entered into this day of
February, 1994# by and ~mong ELI LIT.~;y AND COMPANY an Indiana
Corporation, hereinafter referred to collectively as sLillyu and
the CITY OF TEMECULA, a municipal corporation hereinafter referred
to as the "C~ty."
WHEREAS, prior to incorporation of the City, the County of
Riverside (the "County,, ) initiated and conducted proceedings
pursuant to th~ Mello-ROos Community Facilities Act of 1982, am
amended, Chapter 2.5 (commencing with S 53311) Of Division 2 of
Title 5 of the Government Code (the eHello-Roos Actw), for the
establishment of Community Facilities DistriCt No. 88-12 (Ynez
Corridor) of the County of Riverside, State of California (the
"DistriCt" ) ~ and
WHEREAS, all proceedings. pursuant to the Mellc-Roos Act with
respect to the establishment of the District, the authorization of
the bonded ~ndeb~edness therefor and of the levy of special taxes
cn taxable property therein to pay the principal of and laterest on
the bonds thereof were completed as of March 23, 1990y and
WHEREAS, on or abou~ june 14, 1991, the City entered into an
Agreement entitled ~Agreement Regarding sales Tax Revenues As To
Businesses Located Within The Boundaries Of Community FaCilities
District No, 88-12 (Ins-- Corridor) or Lhe County or Riverside,
State of CalifoFnia" (hereinafter, '*Sales Tax Xgr ment*') with the
ee
Property Owners within the District whereby the City will use a
portion of the sales end use tax revenues received by the City from
sales taX generating businesses located within the District to
reimburse the Property Owners for the specie. 1 taxes; and
WF~RFJtS, among the public improvements which are proposed to
be financed with the proceeds of the bonds of the District is the
widening of Solerie Way from Motor Car Parkway to Margarlta Road, as
shown on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and which will hereinafter
referred to as the eImprovement.;
WHEREAS, ~he Improvement ks not of s oommunity-wide benefit
and, consequently, it is the intent of the City not to use sales
and use tax revenues to reimburse Lilly for payment of special
taxes associated with the Improvement; and .
WHEREAS, City and Lilly have agreed to amend the Sales Tax
Agreement as It applies to Lilly to provide that City will not
reimburse Lilly with sales tax for the Improvement.
NOW, THERBFORE, ~n consideration of the promises and the
mutual covenants and conditions hereinafter set forth, the parties
do hereb~ covenant and agree as followst
Section 1. I~RCTTAT.-. The Recitals set forth above are true
and correct.
10';01235
Section 2. ~11~.FTNTTTONgo Wl~en used in ~his Xeendment, ~e
(a) "Lilly" means ~a~ parcel o~ land located ~i~in
~~ies o~ ~e Dls~tc~ ~ as ~sessors Parcel Map Xo. 921-
090-008 aM as des~i~d in ~lbi~ ~.
(b) "~provem~w me~s widening Solana way Zro~ MOtOr
C~ P~ay ~o ~arita Road, as more specifically des~ibed in
~ibit A, attached h~eto.
(c) "8pecial Tax" or "S~cial Taxes,, means ~e Special
Tax or Tax~ to ~ levied by ~he Board oZ Supe~isors ~ ~e County
d~ing ea~ Ziscal y~ to pay ~e princi~l and int~est
ponio~ or ~e ~nds of ~e Di$~i~ which w~e issued and sold
finance ~e cost oZ design, administration and ~e cons~uction
~he ImprovEant.
h~y ~ended, to provide that ~e amour o~ sales tax
rei~urs~ent to Llll~ is r~uc~ by ~e proport~onate sha~e
Special Tax attrl~tabla to ~e ~nds oZ the District sold
dasi~, a~inist~. ~d cons~ct ~e Improvement describ~
~ibit A. The est~ted cost of the Improvement is $115,000,
however, the actual cost of ~e Improvement will be established by
~e City ~gine~, in his reasonable discretion.
Section 4. ~tT. ~ T~S ~ Rw~rN T~ S~qE. Except as
amended herein, all other te~s of ~e Sales Tax Xgre~ent shall
r~ain ~e 2~e.
3
Section 5. ~UTIIO~TTY. Each part[ hereto represents and
warrants to the other parties that it has the power and authority
to enter into this Amendment, and that each person executing this
Amendment on Ate behalf has been duly authorlead so to act for and
on behalf of such party.
Section 6. ~.NTTRv. ~M~NDM~NT. It As expressly agreed that
this Amendment embodies the ant Are agreement of the parties in
relationship to the subject matter hereof, and that no other
agreement or understanding, verbal or otherwise, relative to the
subject matter hereof exists between the parties at the time of
· execution, and ~ha~ this Amendment may be modified or amended only
k./ a writing signed by the duly aut/loriled and empowered
representatives of each and all of the parties hereto.
Section 7. COUNTerPARTs. This Amendment may be executed An
counterparts sl~ned on behalf of the Cit7 and one or more of Lilly.
Each such counterpart shall be an original Amendment, but all such
counterparts shall together constitute a single agreement.
IN WITNBBB WIiEREOF# t. Jle par~ies heretic have executed this
Amendmen~ the day and year-~irst above vritten.
~OH ROBERT2, NAYOR
Alsi, XOVED X2 TO FORKs
SCOTT F, FIELDr CITY ATTORNEI
BT, I LII~Y MiD COM~Ma
By:.
Print:ed Name:
FZRST AMENDMEanT '~ AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF
TEM~CUla AND RANCliO MOBILE HOMES ESTATES,
REGARDING 2~V.V.S TAX REVENUES OF COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-12 (YNEZ CORRIDOR)
THIS A,GRE~e~NT is made and entered into ~his day of
Februar~, 19 9 4, by and among Rancho Mobile Homes Estates
hereinafter referred to collectively as 'Rancho Mobile Homes" and
the CITY OF TEHE~, a municipal corporation hereinafter referred
to as the 'City."
WHEREAS, prior to incorporation of the City, the county of
Riverside (the "County") initiated and conducted proceedings
pursuant ~o the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as
amenfled, Chapter 2.5 (commencing with S 53311) of Division 2 of
Title 5 of the Government code (the "Mello-Roos Ac~c"), for the
establishment. of Community Facilities District No. 85-12 (Ynez
Corridor) of the County of Riverside, State of Call[ornia (the
eDiStriOt") ] and
WHEREAS, all proceedings pursuant to the Nello-Rooe Act with
respect t0 the establishment of the District, the authorization of
the bonded indebtedness therefor and of t/le lev~ of speolal taxes
on taxable property therein to pay the principal of and interest on
the bonds thereof were completed ae of March 23, 1990; arxd
WHEREAS, on or about June 14, 1991, the City entered into an
1
.r~- i-94 ~C~ 10~43
Agreement entitled "Agreement Regarding S&les Tax Revenues As ro
Businesses I~cated Within ~he Boundaries O2 Community Facilities
Distri~ No. 88-~2 (Yna$ Co~idor) or ~e County o~ ~v~side~
State of C~liZorni$" [h~einaft~, 'Sml~ f~ A~e~wn~n] wi~ ~e
potion o~ ~e sales ~d use tax revenues received ~ t~e City f~
sales tax 9~erating businesses lo~ed ~i~in ~e Distric~ ~o
rei~se'~o ~operty ~ers for ~e speulal taxes; and
~, ~ng the p~lic impro~uts ~ich are proposed ~o
be finan~ wi~ ~e proceeds of ~e ~s of the Distri~ is ~e
widening of 8olana Way from Motor Car P~ay to ~rgari~ R~d, as
eho~ on ~hibit A, ~ta~ed hereto, ud which will h~einaf~er
referr~ to as ~e "Improvuen~e;
~~, ~e I~rov~ent i8 not of a c~uni~y-wide ~efit
and, cone~u~ly, i~ is ~he ~e~ of ~e Ci~7 n~ ~o use sales
and use ~ revuues ~o re~b~se Ran~o ~blle H~es for paint
of speolal t~u associated wi~ ~e ~ov~ent; and
~~S, Cl~7 and hn~o Mobile Homes ha~ age~ to ~d ~e
Sal~ T~ ~eu~ as i~ appliu to Ra~o Mobile Ho~ to provide
~at City will not reimb~se ~~ Mobile Homes wi~ sales ~X for
NOW, ~mRE, in consideration of ~e ~ises and the
mutual cov~u~s and ~ndl~ione h~ei~ft~ S~ fo~h, ~e pa~ies
do h~y coveant and ages as follows:
Se~ion 1. R~CIT~L~. The Reci~ls set fo~ a~ve ~e ~e
and co~ect.
Section 2. ~F. FTNvTTONS. When used in ~his Amendment, ~he
following terms shall hays ~s ~in~s s~ectrted be~Z
(s) ~hn~o ~bil~ Homes~ means ~ ~cel o~ land ~ocatsd
vl~in ~e ~und~i~s oZ ~e Dts~te~ ~o~ as assessors Parcel
No. s21-290-003 a~ as described in ~ibi~ B.
(b) ~I~vemen~v means vid~tng So~a~ Wa~ fr~ No~or Car
Par~a~ to ~g~t~a ~ad, as more speciti~ly described
(~) ~spec~a~ ~u'~ or eSpeois~ ~ese means ~e S~ia~ Tax or
~axes ~O ~ levlea ~ ~he Board o: Sup~isors oZ ~e County
ea~ fis~ ~e~ ~o pay ~e pr~ol~ and ~nteres~ on ~he ~ion
o~ ~e ~nds oZ ~e Dls~t~ ~ich vats issued and so~d ~o Ztnanee
~e cos~ o~ destgn~ a~lnis~ra~on and ~e cons~ion o~ ~o
I~rov~en~.
~TV~n. ~e Sal~ Tax Agre~en~, as t~ a~ies ~o R~ho
Homes, ts here~ ~dea~ ~ provide ~a~ ~e ~o~ oZ Bales ~X
rei~ouen~' ~o hncho Mobile Homes is' redu~d by
propo~i~a~ s~e of SpeciaX Tax s~tbu~Xe ~o ~e bonds of ~e
Dlstri~ sold to dest~, a~inis~ and cons~ ~he Improv~en~
des~Fi~a In E~ibi~ A. ~e es~a~ed cos~ o~ ~he Improvemen~
658~000, h~ever~ ~e ao~ual cos~ of Lhe Improvemen~ will
es~ablished ~ ~he City Engineer, in his reasonable
Se~ion 4, A~,T, ~H~ T~ ~ ~IN ~ ~K~. Excep~
~d~ heroin~ a~l o~ ~ms o~ ~e Sales Tax A~eemen~
re~tn ~e
Section 5. ~UTItORT~Y. ~aoh party hereto represents and
warrants to the other parties that it has the power and authority
to enter into this Amendment, and that each person executing this
Imendment on its behalf has been duly authorized so tO set for and
on behalf of such party.
Section 6. ~,~T~. ~W~IDMk~I~. It is expressly agreed that
~his Amendment embodies the entire agreement of the parties in
.relationship ~o the subject matter hereof, and that no other
agreement or understanding, verbal or otherwise, relative to the
subject matter hereof exists between the parties at the time of
execution, and that this Amendment may be modified or amended only
by a writing signed by the duly authorized and empowered
representatives of each and &ll of the parties hereto.
Section 7. COUNTFd.zPARTS. This Amendment may be executed in
counterparts si%nad on behalf of the City and one or more of Rancho
Mobile Homes. Each such counterpart shall be an original
Amendment, but all such counterparts shall together constitute a
single agreement. .
107012d4
4
r~ WITNESS WHEKEOF, the parties hereto have executed ~his
Amendment the day and year first above written.
Name
Title_
CITY OFT~KWOULa
RON ROBFaTS, MAYOR
JUNE GREEK, CITY CL~K
~PRROVED aS TO Z'OZXs
SCOTT F. FIELD, CITY ATTORNEY
ITEM NO. 6
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY_~
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works\City Engineer
March 8, 1994
Award of Contract for Solana Way Street Improvements (Project No.
PW93-12)
PREPARED BY:
Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council:
Award a contract for the Solena Way Street Improvements, Project PW93-12, to E.L.
Yeager Construction Company for $149,570.O0and authorize the Mayor to execute
the contract and subject approval by the County of Riverside and the adjacent property
owrlers.
Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency
amount of $14,957.00, which is equal to 10% of the contract amount.
BACKGROUND:
On November 23, 1993, the City Council approved the construction plans and specifications,
and authorized the Department of Public Works to solicit public construction bids. This project
includes installation of curb & gutter, sidewalk, pavement and storm drain facilities on both
sides of Solana Way from Motor Car Parkway to Margarita Road. The engineer's estimate for
this project was $160,000.
Eighteen bids for the project were publicly opened on January 20, 1994 and results are as
follows:
1. E.L. Yeager Construction Company .............. $149,570.00.
2. Kruger McGrew Construction Company ........... $154,800.79.
3. E.A. Mendoza .............................. $158,381.70.
4. Matich Corporation .......................... $161,613.92.
5. Boral Resources, Inc .......................... $161,614.65.
-1- pwO4%agdrpt~94%0308%pw93-12.ewd 022294
7. Delgado & Sons, inc ......................... ~170,018.73.
8. Eastland Construction ........................ $173,431.00.
9. Accurate Construction, Inc ..................... $188,948.65.
10. Edmondson Construction ..................... ~ 189,038.20.
11. E.G.N. Construction, Inc ...................... ~189,317.93.
12. IPS Services, Inc ............................ ~197,355.28.
13. Commercial Contractors ...................... $208,589.84.
14. Granite Construction Company ................. ~216,665.00.
15. Civil Works Corporation ...................... ~223,863.88.
16. West Coast Construction ..................... ~231,344.00.
17. Excel Paving Co ............................ $249,204.20.
18. Del Rio ................................... No Bid Bond
E.L. Yeager Construction has not performed any work for the City, but has performed .well
in other areas of Riverside County based on comments from references of previous work.
The construction schedule is for 70 working days. Work is expected to begin in mid-March
and be completed by the end of June.
A copy of the bid summary is available for review in the City Engineer's office.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The project is being funded from the first series of bonds which have been sold for
Community Facilities District 88-12. The Solana Way improvements are not part of the
original CFD 88-12 improvements. A revised Sales Tax Reimbursement Agreement will be
executed with the adjacent property owners on Solana Way. Funds are available for the
construction contact and contingency amounts of $149,570.00 end $14,957.00
respectively. The total amount of $164,527.00is available in the CFD 88-12 account.
-2- pwO4~gdrp694%O308%pw93-12.ewd 022294
CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
CONTRACT
FOR
PROJECT NO. PW93- I2
SOLANA WAY STREET IMPROVEMENTS
THIS CONTRACT, made and entered into the 8th day of March, 1994, by and between the
City of Temecula, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CITY", and E. L. Yeager
Construction Company, hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR."
WITNESSETH:
That CITY and CONTRACTOR, for the consideration hereinafter named, mutually agree as
follows:
1.8.
CONTRACT DOCUMFNTS. The complete Contract includes all of the Contract Documents,
to wit: Notice Inviting Bids, Instructions to Bidders, Proposal, Performance Bond, Labor and
Materials Bond, Plans and Specifications entitled PROJECT NO. PW93-12, $OLANA WAY
tSIH,-~l IMPROVigIIEIITS, Insurance Forms, this Contract, and all modifications and
amendments thereto, the State of Califomia Department of Transportation Standard
Specifications (1992 Ed.) where specifically referenced in the Plans and Technical
Specifications, and the latest version of the Standard Soecifications for Public Works
Construction. including all supplements as wr'rtten and promulgated by the Joint
Cooperative Committee of the Southern California Chapter of the American Associated
General Contractors of California (hereinafter, "Standard Specifications") as amended by
the General Specifications, Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications for PROJECT
NO. PW93-12, SOLAliA WAY :,lewJ:l IMPROVEMBITS. Copies of these Standard
Specifications are available from the publisher:
Building News, Incorporated
3055 Overland Avenue
Los Angeles, California 90034
(213) 202-7775
The Standard Specifications will control the general provisions, construction .materials, and
construction methods for this Contract except as amended by the General, Specifications,
Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications for Project No. PW93-12 SOLANA WAY
STREET IMPROVEMENTS.
In case of conflict between the Standard Specifications and the other Contract Documents,
the other Contract Documents shall take precedence over and be used in lieu of such
conflicting portions.
Where the Contract Document describe portions of the work in general terms, but not in
complete detail, it is understood that the item is to be furnished and installed completed
and in place and that only the best general practice is to be used. Unless otherwise
C ONTR ACT CA- 1 p we t,3ip%p ro)N:te~p w93-12~ilpkg
e
specified, the CONTRACTOR shall furnish all labor, materials, tools, equipment, ant
incidentals, end do all the work involved in executing the Contract.
The Contract Documents are complementary, and what is called for by anyone shall be as
binding as if called for by all. Any conflict between this Contract and any other Contract .
Document shall be resolved in favor of this Contract.
SCOPE OF WORK. CONTRACTOR shall perform everything required to be performed, shall
provide and furnish all the labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable equipment, and all
utility and transportation services required for the following:
PROJECT NO. PW93-12, SOLANA WAY I, Kr.k: ~ IMPROVEMENTS
All of said work to be performed and materials to be furnished shall be in strict accordance
with the Drawings and Specifications and the provisions of the Contract Documents
hereinabove enumerated and adopted by CITY.
CITY APPROVAL. All labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services shall be furnished
and work performed and completed under the direction and supervision and subject to the
approval of CITY or its authorized representatives.
CONTRACT AMOUNT AND RCHEDUI ;. CITY agrees to pay and CONTRACTOR agrees to
accept in full payment for the work above-agreed to be done, the sum of: One hundred and
forty-nine II~:,,s--M and five htmi~ and seventy DOLLARS and no CENTS ($149.570.00).
the total amount of the base bid. "*
CONTRACTOR agrees to complete the work in a period not to exceed seventy (70) working
days, commencing with delivery of Notice to Proceed by CITY. Construction shall not
commence until bonds and insurance are approved by CITY.
CHANGE ORDERS. All change orders shall be approved by the City Council, except that
the City Manager is hereby authorized by the City Council to make, by written order,
changes or additions .to the work in an amount not to exceed the contingency as
established by the City Council.
PAYMENTS. On or about the thirtieth (30th) day of the month next following the
commencement of the work, there shall be paid to the CONTRACTOR a sum equal to
ninety percent (90%) of the value of the work completed since the commencement of the
work. Thereafter, on or about the thirtieth (30th) day of each successive month as the
work progresses, the CONTRACTOR shall be paid such sum as will bring the payments
each month up to ninety percent {90%) of the previous payments, provided that the
CONTRACTOR submits his request for payment prior to the last day of each preceding
month. The final payment, if unencumbered, or any part thereof unencumbered, shall be
made sixty (60) days after CITY acceptance of the work and the CONTRACTOR filing a
one-year warranty with the CITY on a warranty form provided by the CITY. Payments shall
be made on demands drawn in the manner required by law, accompanied by a certificate
signed by the City Manager, stating that the work for which payment is demanded has
been performed in accordance with the terms of the Contract, and that the amount stated
in the certificate is due under the terms of the Contract. Partial payments \on the Contract
price shall not be considered as an acceptance of any part of the work.
CONTRACT CA-2 pwO~oip%projeots%pw93-12~kipkg
WARRANTY RFTFNTION. Commencing with the date the Notice of Completion is
recorded, the CITY shall retain a portion of the Contract award price, to assure warranty
performance end correction of construction deficiencies according to the following
schedule:
CONTRACT AMOUNT
~25,000- $75,000
$75,000-~500,000
Over ~500,000
RFTI:NTION PFRIOD
180 days
180 days
One Year
RFFFNTION PERCENTAGE
3%
~2,250 + 2% of amount in
excess of $75,000
e10,750 + 1% of amount
in excess of e500,O00
e
e
10.
LInUIDATI=D DAMAGES: EXTENSION OF TIME. In accordance with Government Code
Section 53069.85, CONTRACTOR agrees to forfeit and pay to CITY the sum of One
Thousand Dollars (~1,000.00) per day for each calendar day completion is delayed beyond
the time allowed pursuant to Paragraph 4 of this Contract. Such sum shall be deducted
from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. Such sum shall be
deducted from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR
will be granted an extension of time and will not be assessed liquidated damages for
unforeseeable delays beyond the control of end without the fault or negligence of the
CONTRACTOR including delays caused by CITY. CONTRACTOR is required to promptly
notify CITY of any such delay.
WAIVER OF CLAIMS. Unless a shorter time is specified elsewhere in this Contract, on or
before making final request for payment under Paragraph 6 above, CONTRACTOR shall
submit to CITY, in writing, ell claims for compensation under or arising out of this Contract;
the acceptance by CONTRACTOR of the final payment shall constitute a waiver of all
claims against CITY under or arising out of this Contract except those previously made in
writing and request for payment. CONTRACTOR shall be required to execute an affidavit,
release and indemnify agreement with each claim for payment.
PREVAILING WAGES. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the
State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per diem
wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each craft,
classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Contract, from the Director of
the Department of Industrial Relations. These rates are on file with the City Clerk. Copies
may be obtained at cost at the City Clerk's office of Temecula. CONTRACTOR shall post
a copy of such wage rates at the job site and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage rates
as a minimum. CONTRACTOR shall comply with the provisions of Sections 1773.8, 1775,
1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, end 1813 of the Labor Code.
Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, CONTRACTOR shall forfeit to the
CITY, as a penalty, the sum of $25.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each
laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any
work done under this Contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of
the provisions of the Contract.
CONTRACT CA-3 pwOS~ip%proje,~te~w93-12%bldpkg
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
TIME OF THF t=SSENCF. Time is of the essence in this contract.
INDEMNIFICATION. All work covered by this Contract done at the site of construction or
in preparing or delivering materials to the site shall be at the risk of CONTRACTOR aloe.
CONTRACTOR agrees to save, indemnify, hold harmless and defend CITY, its officers, .
employees, and agents, against any and all liability, injuries, or death of persons
(CONTRACTOR's employees included) and damage to property, arising directly or indirectly
out of the obligations herein undertaken .or out of the operations conducted by
CONTRACTOR, save and except claims or litigations arising through the sole active
negligence or sole willful misconduct of the CITY.
GRATUITIES. CONTRACTOR warrants that neither it nor any of its employees, agents, or
representatives has offered or given any gratuities or promises to CITY's employees,
agents, or representatives with a view toward securing this Contract or securing favorable
treatment with respect thereto.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST. CONTRACTOR warrants that he has no blood or marriage
relationship, and that he is not in any way associated with any City officer or employee,
or any architect, engineer, or other puerperal of the Drawings and Specifications for this
project. CONTRACTOR further warrants that no person in his/her employ has been
employed by the CITY within one year of the date of the Notice Inviting Bids.
CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT. After the completion of the work contemplated by this
Contract, CONTRACTOR shall file with the City Manager his affidavit stating that all
workmen and persons employed, all firms supplying materials, and all subcontractors upor
the Project have been paid in full, and that there are no claims outstanding against tht~
Project for either labor or materials, except certain items, if any, to be set forth in an
affidavit covering disputed claims or items in connection with a Stop Notice which has been
filed under the provisions of the laws of the State of California.
RESOLUTION OF CLAIMS. Any dispute or claim arising out of this Contract shall be
arbitrated pursuant to Section 10240 of the California Public Contracts Code.
NOTICE TO CITY OF LABOR DISPUTES. Whenever CONTRACTOR has knowledge that any
actual or potential labor dispute is delaying or threatens to delay the timely performance of
the Contract, CONTRACTOR shall immediately give notice thereof, including all relevant
information with respect thereto, to CITY.
BOOKS AND RECORDS. CONTRACTOR's books, records, and plans or such part thereof
as may be engaged in the performance of this Contract, shall at all reasonable times be
subject to inspection and audit by any authorized representative of the CITY.
INSPECTION. The work shall be subject to inspection and testing by CITY and its
authorized representatives during manufacture and construction and all other times and
places, including without limitation, the plans of CONTRACTOR end any of its suppliers.
CONTRACTOR shall provide all reasonable facilities and assistance for the safety and
convenience of inspectors. All inspections and tests shall be performed in such manner as
to not unduly delay the work. The work shall be subject to final inspection end acceptance
notwithstanding any payments or other prior inspections. Such final inspection shall be
made within a reasonable time after completion of the work.
CONTRACT CA-4 pwOb'%eip%projeote%pw93-12~dpkg
20.
DISCRIMINATION. CONTRACTOR represents that it has not, and agrees that it will not,
discriminate in its employment practices on the basis of race, creed, religion, national origin,
color, sex, age, or handicap.
21.
GOVERNING I AW. This Contract and any dispute arising hereunder shall be governed by
the law of the State of California.
22.
WRITTFN NOTICF. Any written notice required to be given in any part of the Contract
Documents shall be performed by depositing the same in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid,
directed to the address of the CONTRACTOR as set forth in the Contract Documents, and
to the CITY addressed as follows:
Tim D. Sedat, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temacula, CA 92590-3606
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Contract to be executed on the date
first above written.
DATED:
CONTRACTOR
By:
Print or type NAME
Print or type TITLE
DATED:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Ronald H. Roberts, Mayor
Scott F. Field, City Attorney
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
CONTRACT CA-5 pwO5'tdp%projeots%pw93-12%bidpkg
ITEM
NO.
APPROV~T.
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER'
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Manager/City Council
Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
March 8, 1994
Solicitation for Construction of a Single Concrete Box Culvert on
Ynez Road
PREPARED BY: ~rf~ Brad Buron, Maintenance Superintendent
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council authorize solicitation for bids for construction of a single box culvert
located on Ynez Road, 365 feet south of Vallejo Avenue on the east side of Ynez Road.
BACKGROUND:
The existing approved Equestrian Trail located 365 feet south of Vallejo Road on Ynez Road
now dead-ends into Vallejo Channel which is located within the City's maintained right-of-way.
The on-going maintenance of this channel created a break in the Equestrian Trail System
where horses and riders cannot cross due to the depth of the channel. The approved trail now
crosses Ynez Road.
This construction project will provide year-round safe passage over this channel for horses and
riders to use the trail on both sides of Ynez Road.
The proposed concrete box culvert will allow the Vsllejo Channel to continue to function with
minimal maintenance.
The Engineer's estimate for this project is $16,000.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Funds are available in the Public Works Department Drainage Facilities account # 100-164-999-
5401 for the proposed scope of work on Ynez Road.
Attachments:
Attachment "A" Equestrian Trail System
Attachment "B" Location of Box Culvert to be installed
r:~agdrpt%g4%0308~ulvert.bidlejpWP6.0
6000'
ITEM
NO.
8
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY ~
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
· CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
City Clerk
March 8, 1994
Records Destruction Approval
RECOMMENDATION: Approve scheduled destruction of certain records as provided
under the City of Temecula approved Records Retention Policy.
BACKGROUND: On March 22, 1992, the City Council approved Resolution No. 92-17
which authorizes the destruction of certain city records which have become outdated, obsolete
or are excess documents, in compliance with Sections 34090 through 34090.7 of the
Government Code.
The records management program, administered by the City Clerk's Office, is in the process
of microfilming all inactive records that ere over two (2) years old. The attached exhibit
details plot plans for the years 1974 through 1988 which have been copied to microfilm.
Three microfilm copies have been prepared, one to be kept in the Planning Department, one
in the City Clerk's records vault and one in permanent off-site storage.
The City Attorney has reviewed this request and has signed Exhibit "1" of the Annual Review
as provided for in Resolution No. 92-17.
ATTACHMENTS:
JSG
Destruction of Records Request
List of Records recommended for destruction
TO: City Clerk
FROM: Gail Zigler,
Office Specialist
DATE: February 23, 1994
SUBJECT: Destruction of Records Request
Attached is e print out of Plot Plans (Retention TyPe PP) dating from 1984 through
1990. These records have been microfilmed in triplicate with a copy distributed to
the City Clerk's Records Vault, the Planning Department and · copy to the Vault in
San Diego.
The following have reviewed and approved this destruction request.
Pursuant to the requirements of Government Code Section 34090, I hereby give my
consent to the destruction of records under the direction of the City Clerk pursuant
to the City of Temecula's adopted Destruction of Obsolete Records Policy.
Department Heed:
G'ar;Th"~'~hill, Planning Director
Date
City Attorney: ,.~_ r (
Scott F. Field
Date
R:~foeme~leetfuet.eqe
R~ESTY...RR~I CIty of TemacuLa D~. Ref ......... 161 Page 1
~/~/1~ Detruction Stst~ Listing Retention Type... ~ 12:37:~
D~tru~tlon Bats. ~/281199~
D~ Itm Rat. FiLe R~erence # Storege Nedla
Ref. Date Ref. Brief Dentition Type Securt~ CLue Store Location Location Reference
161 ~/H/198~ 809~ PLot PLon 809~ ~ QOQ3 FiLm 3821NIA(X)Q1
Group t 161/l~/Tha VauLt
161 12/~/1986 ~99 PLot Hen ~99 ~ 0(05 FILm
Group ! 161/l~/Tha vault
161 12/~/19~ 9600 PLot PLan 960Q ~ QOQ5 FiLm 3E1H1AOOOl
Group ! 161/12Q/The VauLt
161 1z/~/1986 ~10 PLot PLan ~10 ~ OO(X FiLm 3821N1AOO01
Grc~ ] 161/12~The VauLt
161 12/22/1986 ~ 'PL~ PLan ~ ~ Q(XX FiLm 3821N1AO~1
Group ~ 161/1~he VauLt
161 12~0/19~ 9609 PLot PLan 9609 ~ QQ05 FiLm 3821,1A0001
Group i 161/120/Ths vault
161 01/05/1987 ~07 PLot PLon HO? ~ Q(X)~ FiLm 3821NIAOOO1
Group i 161/1~/T~ VauLt
161 01/~/1987 ~ PLot PLan K~ ~ QQQ/. FiLm 3821N1AQQOl
~ Group ! 161/1~he VauLt
161 _./0~1987 958? PLot PL~ ~87 ~ OO(X FiLm 3821N1AOO01
Group ! 161/1~hs VauLt
161 01/1~/1987 ~11 PLot PLan ~11 ~ QQ(X FiLm 3821.1A0001
Group i 161/120/The vault
161 Q1/19/1987 ~ PLot PLan~ ~ QOQ5 FiLm 3821N1AQOQI
Group ! 161/120/The V~Lt
161 01/21/1987 ~98 PLot PLan~98 ~ OOQ5 FiLm 3821N1AOOO1
Group Z 161/12Q/The VauLt
161 Q1/~/1987 ~ PLot PLan ~ ~ 0005 FiLm 3821H1AOOOl
Group ! 161/12Q/The VauLt
161 01/2~1987 9606 PLot PLan 9606 ~ 0005 FiLm 3821,1A0001
Group ] 161/12Q/The VauLt
161 01/26/1987 961o PLot PLan 9610 ~ QO(O FiLm ~821mAOOO1
Group ! 161/l~/The vault
161 01/30/1987 9~0 PLot PLm 9720 ~ QOQ5 FiLm 3821N1AOOO1
Group i 161/120~he VauLt
161~A~/~/1987 ~15 PLot PLan ~15 ~ QQQS FiLm ~821mAOOOl
Group Z 161/1~ha VauLt
161 02/~/1987 9713 PLot PLan 9713 ~ QOQ5 FiLm 3821N1AOOOl
Group ! 161/120~he VauLt
R~ESTY...RR~I City ~ T~Lo Page 2
~1~/199~ D~truction State Lilting 12:37:30.
D~. item Rat. File Reference # Stor~e 14edto
net. Dote R~. Brief Decri~ton Type Security CLam Store Location Location Rate,
161 02/~/1987 9716 PLot PLan 9716 ~ QQ05 Film 3821NIAQOQ1
Group ! 161/120/TheVoutt
161 02/13/1997 9616 PLot PLan 9616 PP QQ05 Film 3821NIA(XX)1
Group [ 161/120~he Vault
161 02/1~1997 9625 PLot PLan 9625 ~ O(X)5 Film )821NIA~01
Group ! 161/12~The Vault
161 02/2~1987 9629 PLot PLan 9629 PP QO(O Film 3821HIA~01
Group ] 161/120/TheVoutt
161 02/20/1997 9637 PLot PLan 9637 ~ 0005 Film 3821H1AO001
GrokF ! 161/120/The Vault
161 02/20/1997 W~8 PLat PLan 9648 ~ 0005 Film $821N1AO001
Group ! 161/12~The Vault
161 02/26/1987 96~2 Plot PLan 96~2 ~ 0005 Film )821N1AO001
Group ! 161/120/The Vault
161 02/26/1987 9652 PLot PLan 9652 PP 0005 Film 3821N1AO001
Group ! 161/120/The Vault
161 ~/2~1997 9653 PLot Plan 9653 PP QOQ5 Film 3821N1AOOO1
Group ! 161/120/The Vault
161 02/2~1997 9(~3 PLot PLan 9bG) PP 0005 Film 3821N1AO001
Gro~ Z 161/120/The Vault
161 03/~/1997 9669 PLot PLan 9669 PP OQQ5 Film 3821H1AQOQ1
Group [ 161/120/The Vault
161 ~/~/1997 9666 PLot PLan 9666 ~ O(X)5 Film )821NIAQ(X)1
Group ! 161/120~he Vault
161 ~/05/1997 ~71 PLot PLan 9671 ~ QOQ5 Ft tm 3821N1AOO Q1
Group ! 161/120/The Vault
161 ~/~/1997 96~ PLot PLon 96~ ~ 0005 Film 3821N1AO001
Group ! 161/120/The Vault
161 ~10911997 9665 PLot PLan 9665 PP QQQ5 Film 3821N1AQQQ1
Group ! 161/120~he Vault
161 03/10/1997 9683 PLot PLan 9683 PP QQQ5 Film 3821NIAQ(X)l
Group [ 161/120~he Vault
161 ~/10/1997 9~7 PLot PLon 9~7 PP Q005 Film 3821NIAQOQ1
Group ! 161/120/The Vault
161 ~/10/1997 F797 PLot PLan 9?97 ~ QQQ5 Film 3821M1AOOQ1
Group ] 161/120~he VouLt
RRDESTY...RR061 City of T~Le Page 3
0~/06/1~96 Deltru~tto~ iLlLIB Lilting 1~:37:3Q
Do{ Ztem Re!. FILe Reference # Storage fiedie
Ref. Date Ref. Brief Description Type Security CLass Store Location Lecation Reference
161 03/16/1~87 W~5 PLot PLan W~5 PP 0005 Fi Lm ~821N1AO(X)l
Group ! t61/120/The Vault
161 0)/18/1~87 gd86 PLot PLan W~6 FP 000~ Ft Lm 3821141A0001
Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 0)/20/1H7 WA~8 PLot PLan ~88 PP 0005 Film )821H1AO001
Group ! 161/120rrhe Vault
161 03/20/1H7 ~ PLot PLan ~0 PP (XX)5 Film )821H1AO001
Group ! 161/120/The Vault
161 0)/20/1H7 f6f3 PLot PLan ~F_t 'PP 0005 Film )821N1AO001
Group ! 161/120/The Vault
161 0)/Z0/1~87 9702 PLot PLan 9702 PP 0005 Film 3821H1AO001
Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 03/20/1H7 970~ PLot PLan 970~ PP O00S Film )821H1AO001
Group ! 161/120/The Vault
161 0)/21,/1H7 97~ PLot PLan 9734 PP 0005 Film 3821N1AO001
~ Groop ! 161/120/The Vault
161 ..,/30/1H7 9763 PLot PLan 9763 PP 0005 Film 3821HIAO001
GrotF ! 161/120/The Vault
161 04/06/1H7 9752 PLot PLan 9752 PP 0005 Film ]821141A0001
Group i 161/120/The Vault
16104/07/1987 9761 PLot PLan 9761 PP 0005 Film )821H1AO001
Group [ 161/120/The Vault
161 04/07/1~87 9762 PLot PLan 9762 PP O00S Film 3821NIAO001
Group ! 161/120/The VauLt
161 06/1/,/1987 9591 PLot PLan 9591 PP 0006 FiLm 3E1N1AQQ01
Group ! 161/1:~0/The VauLt
161 06/14/1987 9789 PLot Pten 9789 P~ 0005 FiLm 38~¶IllAQ001
Group [ 161/1:~0/The VauLt
161 06/16/1987 9765 PLot PLan 9765 PP 0005 FILm 38~lH1AO001
Group % 161/120/The VauLt
161 04/16/1987 9772 PLot PLan 9772 PP 0005 FiLm 3821141AOQ01
Group [ 161/120rrhe vault
161-.N-/17/1987 9767 PLot PLan 9767 PP 0005 FiLm 3821NIAO001
Group ! 161/120/The VauLt
161 04/17/1987 9770 PLot PLan 9770 PP 0005 FiLm 3821141A0001
Group ! 161/120/The VauLt
R~ESTY...RR061 City of TmzecuL8 Page
~1~/199~ Datruction StBt~ Listing
D~. Item Rat. FiLe Reference # Storage I1edia
Ref. Date Ref. Brief I)escri~ion Type Security Ct.s Store Location Location Refet~.~e
161 ~/2~1987 9798 Plot Plan 9798 ~ 0005 FiLm 3821M1AO001
Group I 161/12~The VauLt
161 ~/2~1981 9/90 Pt~ Plan 9790 PP 0005 Film 3821NIAO001
Group ] 161/12~The VauLt
161 ~/2~1987 9791 Plot PLan 9791 ~ 0005 FiLm 3821N1AO001
Oro~ i 161/120/The VauLt
161 05/02/1987 9810 Plot PLan 9810 ~ 0005 FiLm 3821N1AO001
Group I 161/12~The VauLt
161 ~/~/1987 9802 Plot Plan 9802 PP 0005 Film ~821H1AO001
Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 05/~/1987 980~ PLot PL~ 980~ ~ 0005 Film ~821N1AO001
Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 05/M/1987 9805 Plot PLan 9805 ~ 0005 FiLm ~821NIAO001
Group ! 161/120/The Vault
161 05/08/1987 9838 Plot Plan 9~8 ~ 0005 FiLm 3821N1AO001
Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 05/11/1987 9839 Plot Plan 9839 ~ 0005 Film 3821N1AO001
Group ! 161/120/The Vault
161 05/12/1987 9807 Plot Plan 9807 PP 0005 FiLm 3821Hl&O001
Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 05/1~/1~7 9808 Plot Plan 9808 PP 00~ Film ~821H1A~01
Group ] 161/12~The Vault
161 05/1~/1987 9809A PLot Plan 9809A ~ OOB FiLm 3821NIAO001
Group ! 161/120/The VmuLt
161 05/13/1987 9833 PLot PLan 9~3 ~ OOQ5 FiLm 3821N1AIX)Q1
Group i 161/120/The VauLt
161 05/1~/1987 98~1 PLot PLan 9861 PP QQff FiLm 3821.1A0001
Group i 161/120/The VauLt
161 05/18/1987 981~ PLot PLan 981~ ~ QOQ5 FiLm 3821.1A0001
Group I 161/12Q/The VauLt
161 05/1~1087 9816 PLot PLan 9816 ~ ~ FiLm 3821NIAOOO1
Group I 161/12Q/The VauLt
161 ~/18/1987 9820 PLot PLan 982Q ~ QO05 FiLm 3821N1A0801
Group ! 161/120/The vault
161 05/19/1987 9828 PLot PLan 9828 ~ QOQ5 FiLm ~821N1AOOOl
Group ! 161/12Q/The VauLt.
R~ESTY...RR~I Ctty of TaBSCutS Page 5
021~/199~ Detructim Status ListiN -12:37:~
Dec !tm Ret. FiLe Reference # $torage Nedia
Ref. Bate Ref. Brief D.cription Type 'Security CLass Storage Location Location Reference
161 ~/1~1~7 9836 PLot PLm 9e36 ~ QOQ5 Film 3821N1AQOQ1
Group z 161/1~nhe Vault
161 e/1~1~? 9835 PL~ PLm ge35 ~ (XX)5 F! Lm 3821N1AQO Q1
Group I 161/120~he Vault
161 05/1~1~7 9836 PLot Pt~ 9836 ~ 00~ Film 3821N1AQO01
Group ! 161/12~The Vault
161 ~/01/1~7 9827 PLot Pt~ 9827 ~ ~ Film 3821.1A0001
Group Z 161/12Q/The Vault
161 ~10111~7 98/48 PLot PL~ 9668 ~ 0005 Film 3821.1A0001
Group ! 161/1~he Vault
161 ~/~/1~7 ~ PLot PL~ 98~ ~ QQQ5 Film 3821M1AOOOl
Group z 161/l~/The Vault
161 ~/~/1~7 ~ PLot PL~ 9876 PP 0005 Ftlm 3821N1AOOO1
Group I 161/1~he Vault
161 ~/1~1987 9636 PLot PLm 963~ PP 0005 FILm 3821N1AOOO1
~ Group z 161/1~b Vault
161 ,~/~/1~7 98~ PLot PL~ ~ ~ QOQ5 Film 3821N1AOOO1
Group I 161/12Q/The Vault
161 ~/~/19~ ~56 Plot Plan ~56 ~ QO0 Film 3821NIAO01
Group I 161/12Q/The Vault
161 ~/~/19~ ~53 PLot Pton ~53 PP 006 FiLm 3821H1AO001
Group i 161/120/The VauLt
161 ~/28/1988 ~28 PLot Plan 9628 ~ 0005 FILm 3821N1AO001
Group I 161/1~/The V~utt
161 0~18/1988 ~? PLot PiN ~? ~ 000300011g0 FiLe 3821NIAO001
Group I 161/l~/The Vault
161 02/21/1990 ~ PLot Pt~ 800~ pp ~ Film 3821M1AO001
Group I 161/1~/The Vault
86 Records Processed
ITEM
NO.
9
APPROV~T.
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT :
TO:
FROM:
City Council/City Manager
Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
DATE:
March 8, 1994
SUBJECT:
Release Faithful Performance Warranty Bonds and Material and
Labor Bonds in Tract No. 21674-F.
PREPARED BY: ~ Albert Crisp, Permit Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council authorize the release of Street, and Water and Sewer Improvement
Faithful Performance Warranty Bonds and Material and Labor Bonds in Tract No. 21674-F, and
direct the City Clerk to so advise the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors.
BACKGROUND:
On January 12, 1990, the City Council approved the Final Map for Tract No. 21674-5, and
the Riverside County Board of Supervisors entered into subdivision agreements with
Mesa Homes (now Kemper Real Estate Development Co.)
27555 Ynez Road, Suite 200
Temecula, CA 92591
for the improvement of streets, and installation of sewer and water systems. Accompanying
the subdivision agreements were surety bonds issued by Lumbermens Mutual Casualty
Company as follows:
1. Bond No. 3S 687 485 000 in the amount of $259,000.00 to cover street
improvements.
2. Bond No. 3S 687 486 00 in the amount of $32,000.00to cover water improvements.
3. Bond No. 3S 687 487 00 in the amount of $41,000.00to cover sewer improvements.
Pege 1 of 2 pwO2%agdrpt~94~,0308~tr21674F.exo
Bond No's. 3S 687 485 00, 3S 687 486 00, and 3S 687 487 00 in the amounts of
~ 129,500.00, 816,000.00, end $20,500.00, respectively, to cover material and labor
for street, water, and sewer improvements.
On December 17, 1991, the City Council accepted these improvements and retained the
following secured amounts for a one (1) year maintenance period:
Streets: Bond No. 3S 687 485 00 $25,900.00
Water: Bond No. 3S 687 486 00 $3,200.00
Sewer: Bond No. 3S 687 487 00 $4,100.00
TOTAL: $33,200.00
The developer was required to post Material and Labor Bonds to ensure payment to suppliers
ahd workers. These bonds ere maintained in effect for a minimum period of time determined
by statute after the Governmental Agency has accepted the public improvements. Since no
claims have been filed with the City Clerk, and adequate time has passed, Staff recommends
that the City Council authorize the release of the Material and Labor Bonds.
The warranty period having been exceeded, and any and all necessary repairs and
replacements having been satisfactorily completed, Staff also recommends the release of the
Faithful Performance Warranty Bonds (3S 687 485 00, 3S 687 486 00, and 3S 687 487 00).
The affected street is Corte Salinas.
Attachment: Vicinity Map
Page 2 of 2 pwO2%egdrpt%94%O308%tr21674F.exo
To Ceem
Project Site
\ /
Kale l's4OOO'
'ITEM NO. I0
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAl
CITY ATTORNEY ~
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
March 8, 1994
Final Parcel Map No. 27509
PREPAREI~~m D. Faul, Assistant Engineer - Land Development
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council approve Final Parcel Map No. 27509 subject to the Conditions of
Approval.
BACKGROUND:
Tentative Parcel Map No. 27509, Amendment No. 3, was approved by the City of Temecula
Planning Director, Gary Thornhill, on February 18, 1993. The Developer has met all of the
Conditions of Approval.
Final Parcel Map No. 27509 is a two (2) parcel lot commercial subdivision of 3.25 acres
located on the westerly side of Diaz Road between Rancho California Road and Rancho Way.
The site currently has an existing packing house located on Parcel No. 2 of the Parcel Map.
Surrounding land uses include vacant land and manufacturing uses. The site is zoned
manufacturing service commercial (M-SC) as are adjacent parcels. The established zoning on
the property conforms with the land use designation on the General Plan for the City of
Temecula.
The following fees have been deferred for Final Parcel Map No. 27509:
Area Drainage Fees
Staphen's K-Rat Mitigation Fees
Fire Mitigation Fees
Public Facilities Fee
Traffic Signal Mitigation Fees
Due prior to grading permit
Due prior to grading permit
Due prior to building permit
Due prior to building permit
Due prior to building permit
No bonds are required because there are no public improvements associated with this parcel
map,
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
ATTACHMFNTS:
2.
3.
4.
5.
Development Fee Checklist
Project Location Map
Final Parcel Map No. 27509
Conditions of Approval
Fees & Securities Report
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEVELOPMENT FEE CHECKLIST
CASE NO.: Parcel MaD No. 97509
The following fees were reviewed by Staff relative to their applicability to this
project.
FEE
Habitat Conservation Plan (K-Rat)
Flood Control (ADP)
Public Facility
Traffic Signal Mitigation
Fire Mitigation
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Due prior to grading permit
Due prior to grading permit
Due prior to building permit
Due prior to building permit
Due prior to building permit
r:%agdmt%g4%O308%pm275091~p
p,,ANCHO
2,
I/ICINITY MAP
N~T TO 5'C,41,E
i
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Tentative Parcel Map No. 27509, Amendment No. 3.
Project Description: To subdivide a 3.35 lot into
two lots in the Manufacturing Service Commercial
(M-SC) zone.
Assessor's Parcel No.: 921-040-024
Approval Date: February 18, 1993
Expiration Date: February 18, 1993
e
Thetentative subdivision shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act
and to all the requirements of Ordinance. 460, unless modified by the conditions listed
below.
e
The subdivider shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City. of Temecula, it
agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City
of Temecula, its advisory agencies, appeal boards or legislative body concerning
Tentative Parcel Map No. 27509, Amendment No. 3 which action is brought within
the time period provided for in California Government Code Section 66499.37. The
City of Temecula will promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim; action, or
proceeding against the City of Temecula and will cooperate fully in the defense. If the
City fails to promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding or
fails to cooperate fully in the defense, fie subdivider shall not, thereafter, be
responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City of Temecula.
.Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid prior to recordation of the final map.
Future development. of Parcel No. 2 will require subsequent approvals. · ....
The applicant shall comply with the environmental health recommendations outlined
in the County Health Department's transmittal dated July 13, 1992, a copy of which
is attached.
The applicant shall comply with the flood control recommendations outlined in the
Riverside County Rood Control District's letter dated July 14, 1992, a copy of which
is attached. If the project lies within an adopted flood control drainage area pursuant
to Section 10.25 of City of Temecula Land Division Ordinance 460, appropriate fees
for the construction of area drainage facilities shall be collected by the City prior to
issuance of Occupancy Permits.
The applicant shall comply with the fire improvement recommendations outlined in the
County Fire Department's letter dated October 14, 1992, a copy of which is attached.
8. Lots created by this subdivision shall comply with the following:
Lots created by this subdivision shall be in conformance with the development
standards of the Manufacturing Service Commercial (M-SC) zone.
PRIOR
Graded but undeveloped land shall be maintained in a weed-free condition and
shall be either planted with interim landscaping or provided with other erosion
· control measures as approved by the Director of Building and Safety.
TO RECORDATION OF THE RNAL MAP
An Environmental Constraints Sheet (ECS) shall be prepared in conjunction with the
final map to delineate identified environmental concerns and shall be permanently filed
with the office of the City Engineer. A copy of the ECS shall be transmitted to the
Planning Department for review and approval. The approved ECS shall be forwarded
with copies of'the recorded final map to the Planning Department and the Department
of Building and Safety. The following notes shall be placed on the ECS sheet:
This property is located within thirty (30) miles of Mount Palomar 'Observatory.
All proposed outdoor lighting systems shall comply with the California Institute
of Technology, Palomar Observatory recommendations.
10. The following shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Director:
a. A copy of the Final Map~ -
b. A copy of the Rough Grading Plans.
c. A copy of the Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS).
PRIOR TO GRADING PERMIT
11.
Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall comply With the provisions
of Ordinance No. 663 by paying .the appropriate fee .set forth in that ordinance for
Parcel No. 2 only. Should Ordinance No. 663 be superseded by the provisions of a
Habitat Conservation Plan prior to the payment of the fee required by Ordinance No.
663, the applicant shall pay the fee required by the Habitat Conservation Plan as
implemented by County ordinance or resolution.
12. The following shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Director:
a. A copy of the Final Grading Plans.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
The following are the Department of Public Works Conditions of Approval for this project, and
shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All questions regarding the true
meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the appropriate staff person of the Department
of Public Works.
it is understood that the developer correctly shows on the tentative map or site plan all
existing and proposed easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage
courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and
revision.
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
13.
A Grading Permit for either rough or precise (including all on-site flat work and
improvements) construction shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works
prior to commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained road right-
of-way.
14.
An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior
to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City
right-of-way.
15. All. improvement plans, grading plans, landscape and irrigation plans shall be
coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements
contiguous to the site.
16.. Pursuant to Section 66493 of the Subdivision Map Act;any subdivision which is part
of an existing Assessment District must comply with the requirements of said section.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS:
~7. The final grading plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be
reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works.
18.' All lot drainage shall be directed to the driveway by side yard drainage swales
independent of any other lot.
19.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit, developer must comply with the requirements of
the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State
Water Resources Control Board.. No grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice
of Intent has been filed or the project is shown to be exempt.
20.
The earth swale alo{qg. southerly and westerly of the project shall be grass-lined.
Ultimate design and improvements shall be provided at plot plan stage.
21.
Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the developer shall receive written clearance
from the following agencies as deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works:
{Amended at the Planning Director's Healing, February 18, 1993)
San Diego Regional Water Quality
Planning Department
Department of Public Works
Riverside County Health Department
General Telephone
Southern California Edison Company
Southern California Gas Company
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
A Soils Report shall be prepared by a registered soils engineer and submitted to the
Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check, The report shall
address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the
construction of engineered structures and pavement sections,
The erosion control plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and submitted
to the Department of Public Works for review and approval.
Graded but undeveloped land shall be maintained in a .weed-free condition and shell be
either planted with interim landscaping or provided with other erosion control measures
as approved by the Department of. Public Works,
A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the prevailing Area
Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new development. The charge is
payable to the Riverside County Rood Control and Water Conservation District prior
to issuance of permits. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has been
already credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid.
The developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or slope easements for
off-site work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public
Works.
A Flood Plain Development Permit and drainage study shall be submitted to the
Department of Public Worksfor review and approval. The drainage study shall include,
but not be limited to, the following criteria:
Drainage and flood protection facilities which will protect all structures by
diverting site runoff to streets or approved storm drain facilities as directed by
the Department of Public Works.
Adequate provision shall be made for the acceptance and disposal of surface
drainage entering the property from adjacent areas.
The impact to the site from any flood zone as shown on the FEMA flood hazard
map and. any necessary mitigation to protect the site.
d. Identify and mitigate impacts of grading to any adjacent floodway.
The location of existing and post development l O0-year floodplain and
floodway shall be shown on the improvement plan.
The subdivider shall accept and properly dispose of all off-site drainage flowing onto
or through the site. In the event the Department of Public Works permits the use of
streets for drainage purposes, the provisions of Article XI or Ordinance No, 460 will
apply. Should the quantities exceed the street capacity, or use of streets be prohibited
for drainage purposes, the subdivider shall provide adequate facilities as approved by
the Department of Public Works,
A drainage channel and/or flood protection well will be required to protect the
structures by diverting sheet runoff to Streets, or to a storm drain.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
PRIOR
35.
36.
37. '
The subdivider shall protect downstream properties from damages caused by alteration
o'~ the drainage patterns; i.e., concentration or diversion of flow. Protection shall be
provided by constructing adequate drainage facilities, including enlarging existing
facilities or by securing a drainage easement.
A drainage easement shall be obtained from the affected property owners for the
release of concentrated or diverted storm flows onto the adjacent property. A copy
of the drainage easement shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for
re.view.prior to recordation. The location of the recorded easement shall be delineated
on the grading plan.
The site is in an area identified on the flood hazards maps as Rood Zone "B". All
structures shall be protected from this hazard.
The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site property
interests, and if he or she should fail to do so, the developer shall at least 120 days
prior to submittal of the final map of approval, enter into an agreement to complete the
improvements pursuant to Government Code Section 66462 at such time as the City
acquires the property interests required for the improvements. Such agreement shall
provide for payment by the developer of all costs incurred by the City to acquire the
off-site property interests required in connection w..ith the subdivision. Security of a
portion of these costs shall be in the form of cash deposit in the amount given in an
appraisal report obtained by the developer, at the developer's cost. The appraiser shall
have been approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal.
~ior to issuance of grading permits, a qualified paleontologist aholl bc rctainod by thc
developer for consultation and comment on the propoaod grading with respect to
potentia! polcontologioal impacts. Should the paloontologiat find the potential is high
for impact to significant rcsouroos, a pro grading mo0ting botwcon thc paleontologist
and thc oxoa,,ation and gr-~ding contractor shall bo arranged. When noocso-~ry, the
paleontologist or roprcsontativc 3hall havc the authority to temporarily divert, rodiroct
or halt grading activity to allow recovery of fo~,~ils. (Amended at the Planning
Director's Hearing, February 18, 1993)
TO THE ISSUANCE OF ENCROACHMENT PERMITS: ."
All necessary grading permit requirements shall have been submitted/accomplished to
the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works.
Improvements plans, including but no limited to, streets, parkway trees, street lights,
driveways, drive aisles, parking lot lighting, drainage facilities and paving shall be
prepared by a registered Civil Engineer on 24' x 36" mylar sheets and approved by the
Department of Public Works. Final plans (and profiles on streets) shall show the
location of existing utility facilities and easements as directed by the Department of
Public Works.
The following criteria shall be observed in the design of the improvement plans to be
submitted to the Department of Public Works:
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
PRIOR
43.
Flow line grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over
A.C. paving.
Driveways shall conform to the applicable City Standard Nos. 207/207A and
401 (curb and sidewalk).
All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees or as
approved by the Department of Public Works.
de
All concentrated draina~je directed towards the public street shall be conveyed
through under-sidewalk drains.
The minimum centerline street grade shall be 0.50 percent or as otherwise approved
by the Department of Public Works.
Improvement plans per City Standards for the private streets or drives shall be required
for review and approval by the Department of Public Works.
All utility systems including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer, and cable TV shall
be provided for underground, with easements provided as required, and designed and
constructed in accordance with City Codes and the utility provider.. Telephone, cable
TV, and/or security systems shall be pre-wired' in the residence.'
All utilities, except electrical lines rated 33kv or greater,'shall be installed underground.
All conditions of the Grading Permit and Encroachment Permit shall be complied with
to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works.
TO RECORDATION OF FINAL MAP:
The developer shall construct or post security and enter into an agreement
guaranteeing the construction of the following public improvements in conformance
with applicable City Standards and subject to 'approval by the Department of Public
Works. .
a. Street improvements, which may include, but not limited to: pavement, curb
and gutter, sidewalks, drive approaches, street lights, signing, traffic signals,
and other traffic control devices as appropriate.
Storm drain facilities.
c. Landscaping (slopes and parkways).
d. Erosion control and slope protection.
e. Sewer and domestic water systems.
f. All trails, as required by the City's Master Plans.
g. Undergrounding of p~oposed utility distribution lines.
45.
46.
48.
49.
50.
As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
San Diego Regional Water Quality
Rancho California Water .District
Eastern Municipal Water District
City of Temecula Fire Bureau
Planning Department
.Department of Public Works
Riverside County Health Department
CA'IV Franchise
General Telephone
Southern California Edison Company; and
Southern California Gas Company
All road easements and/or street dedications shall be offered for dedication to the
public and shall continue in force until the City accepts or abandons such offers. All
dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the Department of
Public Works.
Sufficient right-of-way along Diaz Road shall be conveyed for public use to provide for
a 50-foot half-width right-of-way. Existing improvements shall be reviewed prior to
recordation of the final map; and if not per current standards of the City of Temecula,
they shall be replaced to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works.
Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be required and shall be
delineated and noted on the final map.
An easement for a joint use driveway shall be provided prior to approval of the final
map or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first.
Easements, when required for roadway slopes, landscape easements, drainage
facilities, utilities, etc., shall be shown on the final map if they are located within the
land division boundary.. All offers of dedication and conveyances shall be submitted
for review and recorded as directed by the Department of Public Works. On-site
drainage for facilities located outside of road right-of-way shall be contained within
drainage easements and shown on the final map. A note shall be added to the final
map stating "drainage easements shall be kept free of buildings and obstructions."
An Environmental Constraints Sheet (ECS) shall be prepared in conjunction with the
final map to delineate identified environmental concerns and shall be permanently filed
with the office of the City Engineer. A copy of the ECS shall be transmitted to the
Planning Department for review and approval. The following information shall be on
the ECS:
a. The delineation of the area within the 100-year floodplain,
b. Special study zone,
51.
The developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an
Environmental Constraint Sheet recorded with any underlying maps related to the
subject property.
52.
53.
PRIOR
The developer shall deposit with the Department of Public Works a cash sum as
established, per lot, as mitigation towards traffic signal impacts. Should the developer
choose to defer the time of payment of traffic signal mitigation fees, he may enter into
a written agreement with the City deferring said payment to the time of issuance of
a building permit.
The developer shall notify the City's CA'iV Franchises of the .Intent to Develop..
Conduit shall be installed to CATV Standards at time of street improvements.
TO BUILDING PERMIT:
54.
A precise grading plan shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review
and approval. 'The building pad shall be certified by a registered Civil Engineer for
location and elevation, and the Soils Engineer shall issue a Final Soils Report addressing
compaction and site conditions.
55.
· 56.
Grading of the' subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code,
the approved grading plan, the conditions of grading permit, City Grading Standards,
and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial
conformance with the approved rough grading plan.
Developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities imposed
upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public facility mitigation as
required underthe EIR/Negative Declaration for the project..The fee to be paid shall
be in the amount in effect at the time of payment of the fee. If an interim or final
public facility mitigation fee or district has not been finally established by the date on
which developer requests its building permits for the project, or any phase thereof, the
developer shall execute the Agreement for payment of Public Facility fee, a copy of
which has been provided to developer. Concurrently with executing this Agreement,
developer shall post a bond to secure payment of the Public Facility fee. The amount
of the bond shall be $2.00 per square foot, not to .exceed $10,000. Developer
understands that said Agreement may require the payment of fees in excess of those
now estimated (assuming benefit to the project in the amount of such fees). By
execution of this Agreement, developer will waive any right to protest the provisions
of this Condition, of this Agreement, the formation of any traffic impact fee district,
or the process, levy, or collection of any traffic mitigation or traffic impact fee for this
project; provided that developer is not waiving its right to protest the reasonableness
of any traffic impact fee, and the amount thereof.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY:
57.
All improvements shall be completed and in place per the approved plans, including bUt
not limited to, curb and gutter, A.C, pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, drainage
facilities, parkway trees and street lights on all interior public streets,
58.
59.
60.
61.
62.
63.
The subdivider shall provide "STOP" controls at the intersection of local streets with
arterial streets as directed by the Department of Public Works.
Asphaltic emulsion (fog seal) shall be applied only as directed by the Department of
Public Works at a rate of 0.05 gallon per square yard. Asphalt emulsion shall conform
to Section Nos. 37, 39 and 94 of the State Standard Specifications.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Riverside County
Fire Department transmittal dated October 14, 1992, a copy of which is attached.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Riverside County
Rood Control District's transmittal dated July 14, 1992, a copy of which is attached.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Riverside County
Health Department transmittal dated July 13, 1992, a copy of which is attached.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Rancho California
Water District transmittal dated July 15, 1992, a copy of which is attached.
CITY OF TEMECULA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT
PARCEL MAP NO. 27509
IMPROVEMENTS
Street and Drainage
Water
Sewer
TOTAL
Maintenance Retention
Monument Security
DATE: February 18, 1993
FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE MATERIAL & LABOR
SECURITY SECURITY
$ 0.00 $- 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
$ 0.00 ~ 0.00
$ 0.00
$ 0.00
Note: No bonds are required because there are no public improvements associated
with this parcel map.
DEVELOPMENT FEES
City Traffic Signing and Striping Costs
RCFCD Drainage Fee Due
Fire Mitigation Fee Due
Signal Mitigation Fee - SMD #
Road and Bridge Benefit Fee
Other Development Fees
$ 0.00
$ T.B.D.*
$ T.B.D.*
$ T.B.D.*
$ N/A
$ N/A
SERVICE FEES
Planning Fee
Comprehensive Transportation Plan
Plan Check Fee
Inspection Fee
Monument Inspection Fee
Fees Paid To Date
Balance of Fees Due
54.00
4.00
750.00
0.00
0.00
808.00
0.00
* T.B.D. - To Be Dete~ed
r,~NdrptSM~eWm27SOg/eJp
ITEM NO. I 1
ORDINANCE NO. 94-06
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF CITY OF
TEMECULA, AMENDING SECTION NO. 18.28.A.C.(10)
OF ORDINANCE NO. 30 PERTAINING TO TTTF~ TYPE
OF PAVING MATERIAL REQUI~ED FOR ACCESS TO
SECOND DWELLING UNrrS
THE CITY'COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, STATE OF
CALIFO~, DOES ORDAIN AS FOT-LOWS:
Section 1. City Ordinance No. 90-04 adopted by reference certain portions of the
Non-Codi~ed Riverside County Ordinances, including Ordinance No.' 348. Section
18.28.a.c.(10) of Ordinance No. 348 is hereby mended to read as follows:
"(10) Any second unit placed more than 150 feet from a pubtic right-of-way shall be
required to provide all-weather access for emergency vehicles from a pubficly
maintained road. Aspbaltic or concrete paving is required for all-weather
access; however, this requirement may be waived if all of the following
conditions are met:
A soils report (pr,~wed by a licensed soil or civil engineer) is
submitted to the Depamnent of Public Works for approval. The report
shall determine the stability of the soils at the project site and contain
recommendations for alternative material types and any associated
drainage facilities that will support a 30,000 pound emergency vehicle.
Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall record a
waiver, releasing the City of Temecula of any liability in the event that
emergency vehicles cannot utilize the drive lane.
The all-weather access shall be conanuously maintained by the property
owner such that it will support a 30,000 pound emergency vehicle at all
times.
The City of Temecula will not accept or maintain the roadway until it
has been improved to City of Temecula Standards as identified in the
Circulation Element of the General Plan. *
Section 2. Severability. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this
Ordinance is severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any
sentence, paragraph, or section of this ordinance to be invalid, such decisions shall not affect
the validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance.
0rde 94-06
Seerion 3. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days afUn' its
passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. The City Clerk
shall publish a summary of this Ordinance and a certified copy of the fill] text of this
Ordinance shall be posted in the office of the City Clerk at least five days prior to the
adoption of this Ordinance. Within 15 diys"f/6t~' adopti~m~0'f this Ordinance, the City Clerk
shall publish a summary of this Ordinance, together with the names of the Councilmembers
voting for and against the Ordinance, and post the same in the office of the City Clerk.
Seerion 4.' PASSk':B, APPRO~ AND ADOFrED titis 8th day of March, 1994.
ATTEST:
Ron Robens, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss
crrY OF TEMECULA)
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify ~ ~he
foregoing Ordinance No. 94-06 was duly introduced and placed upon i~s first reading at a
regular meeting of the City Council on ~he 22nd day of February, 1994, and that thereafter,
said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed a regular meeting of the City Council on the 8th
day of March, 1994 by the following wll call vote:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
CO~CH..,MBV[BERS:
CO~CILMEMBERS:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
· ITEM NO. 12
ORDINANCE NO. 94-07
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ADOPTING LAND DEVF~LOPMENT STANDARDS FOR
SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 164, LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST
CORNER OF NICOLAS ROAD AND NORTH GENERAL KEARNY
ROAD
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The official zoning map of the City of Temecula, entitled
"Temecula/Rancho California Area" as adopted pursuant to Section 34 of Ordinance No. 90-
04, is amended as shown which map is made a pan of this ordinance.
Section 2. Article XVIIa of Ordinance No. 348, as adopted by reference pursuant to
Ordinance 90-04, is amended by adding thereto a new Section 17.46 to read as follows:
Section 17.46 SP ZONE REQUIREMENTS AND STANDARDS FOR SPECIFIC PLAN
NO. 164.
a. Planning Area 1.
(1) The uses permitted in Planning Area 1 of Specific Plan No. 164 shah be the
same as those uses permitted in Article VI, Section 6.1 of Ordinance No. 348.
(2) The development standards for Planning Area 1 of Specific Plan No. 164 shall
be the same as those standards identified in Article VI, Section 6.2 of Ordinance no. 348,
except that the development standards set froth in Article VI, Section 6.2(a), Co), (c), (d),
and (e)(1), (2), and (3) shall be deleted and replaced by the following:
A. Building height shall not exceed two stories, with a maximum height of
thirty-five feet (35').
B. Lot area shall be not less than ten thousand (10,000) square feet. The
minimum lot area shall be determined by excluding that portion of a lot that is used solely
for access to the portion of a lot used as a building site.
C. The minimum avenge width of that portion of a lot to be used as a
building site shall be seventy feet (70') with a minimum average depth of one hundred feet
(100'). That portion of a lot used for access on "flag" lots shall have a minimum width of
twenty feet (20').
5\orals\94-07 I
D. The minimum frontage of a lot shall be seventy feet (70'), except that
lots fronting on knucldes or cul-de-sacs may have a minimum frontage of thirty feet (30').
E. The front yard shall be not less than twenty-five feet' (25'), measured
from the existing street line or from any future street line as shown in any Specific Plan of
Highways, whichever is nearer the proposed structure.
F. Side yards on interior and through lots shall be not less than ten feet
(10'). Side yards on comer and reverse comer lots shall be not less than twenty-five feet
(25') from the existing street line or from any future street line as shown on any Specific
Plan of Highways, whichever is nearer the proposed structure, upon which the main building
sides, except that where the lot is less than fifty feet (50') wide the yard need not exceed
twenty percent (20%) of the width ofthe lot.
G. The rear yard shall not be less than twenty feet (20').
In addition, the following standards shall also apply:
AA: No lot shall have more than twenty-five percent (25 %) of its net area
covered by Buildings or structures.
the curb.
BB.
No garage shall be situated closer than thirty feet (30') from the face of
(3) Except as provided above, all other zoning requirements shall be the same as
those requirements identified in Article VI of Ordinance No. 348.
b. Plannin~ Area 2.
(1) The uses permiRed in Planning Area 2 of Specific Plan No. 164 shall be the
same as those uses permitted in Article VI, Section 6.1 of Ordinance No. 348.
(2) The development standards for Planning Area 2 of Specific Plan No. 164'shall
be the same as those standards identified in Article VI, Section 6.2 of Ordinance No. 348,
except that the development standards set forth in Article VI, Section 6.2(a), Co), (c), (d),
and (e)(1) and (2) shall be deleted and replaced by the following:
A. Building height shall not exceed two stories, with a maximum height of
thirty-five feet (35').
B. Lot area shall be not less than four thousand (4,000) square feet. The
minimum lot area shall be determined by excluding that portion of a lot that is used solely
for access to the portion of a lot used as a building site.
5\ords\94-07 2
C. The minimum average width of that portion of a lot to be used as a
building site shall be thirty-five feet (35') with a minimum average depth of eighty feet (80').
That portion of a lot used for access on "flag" lots shall have a minimum width of twenty
feet (20').
D. The minimum frontage of a lot shall be forty feet (40'), except that lots
fronting on knuckles or cul-de-sacs may have a minimum frontage of thirty feet (30').
E. The front yard shall be not less than' thirty feet (30'), measured from
the existing street line or from any future street line as shown in any Specific Phn of
Highways, whichever is nearer the proposed structure.
F. Side yards on interior and through lots shall be not less than five feet
(5'). However, if a zero lot line design is utilized, the alternate side yard may not be less
than ten feet (10'). Side yards on comer and reverse corner lots shall be not less than ten
feet (10') from the existing street line or from any future street line as shown on any Specific
Plan of Highways, whichever is nearer the proposed structure, upon which the main building
sides, except that where the lot is less than fifty feet (50') wide, the yard need not exceed
twenty percent (20%) of the lot.
In addition, the following standard shall also apply:
AA. No lot shall have more than sixty percent (60%) of its net area covered
by buildings or structures.
(3) Except as provided above, all other zoning requirements shall be the same as
those requirements identified in Article VI of Ordinance No. 348.
c. Planning Area 3.
(1) The uses permitted in Planning Area 3 of Specific Plan No. 164 shall be the
same as those uses permitted in Article VI, Section 6.1 or Ordinance No. 348.
(2) The development standards for Planning Area 3 of Specific Plan No. 164 shall
be the same as those standards identified in Article VI, Section 6.2 of Ordinance No. 348,
except that the development standards set forth in Article VI, Section 6.2(a), Co), (c), (d),
and (e)(1) and (2) shall be deleted and replaced by the following:
A. Building height shall not exceed two stories, with a maximum height of
thirty-five feet (35').
B. Lot area shall be not less than four thousand (4,000) square feet. The
minimum lot area shall be determined by excluding that portion of a lot that is used solely
for access to the portion of a lot used as a building site.
5~ords\94-07 3
C. 'The minimum average width of that portion of a lot to be used as a
bufiding site shall be thirty-five feet (35 ') with a minimum average depth of eighty feet (80').
That portion of a lot used for access on "flag" lots shall ~have a minimum width of twenty
feet (20').
D. The minimum frontage of a lot shall be forty feet (40'), except that lots
fronting on knuckles or cul-de-sacs may have a minimum frontage of thirty feet (30').
E. The front yard shall be not less than thirty feet (30'), measured from
the existing street line or from any future street line as shown in any Specific Plan of
Highways, whichever is nearer the proposed structure.
F. Side yards on interior and through lots shall be not less than five feet
(5'). However, if a zero lot line design is utilized, the alternate side yard may not be less
than ten feet (10'). Side yards on comer and reverse comer lots shall be not less than ten
feet (10') form the existing street line or from any future street line as shown on any Specific
Plan of Highways, whichever is nearer the proposed structure, upon which the main building
sides, except that where the lot is less than fifty feet (50') wide, the yard need not exceed
twenty percent (20%) of the width of the lot.
In addition, the following standard shall also apply:
AA. No lot shall have more than sixty percent (60%) of its net area covered
buildings or structures.
(3) Except as provided above, all other zoning requirements shall be the same as
those requirements identified in Article VI of Ordinance No. 348.
d. Planning Area 4.
(1) The uses permitted in Planning Area 4 of Specific Plan No. 164 shall be the
same as those uses permitted in Article VI, Section 6.1 of Ordinance No. 384.
(2) The development standards for Planning Area 4 of Specific Plan No. 164 shall
be the same as those standards identified in Article VI, Section 6.2 of Ordinance No. 348,
except that the development standards set forth in Article VI, Section 6.2(a), (b), (c), (d),
and (e)(1) and (2) shall be deleted and replaced by the following:
A. Building height shall not exceed two stories, with a maximum height of
thirty-five feet (35').
B. Lot area shall be not less than four thousand (4,000) square feet. The
minimum lot area shall be determined by excluding that portion of a lot that is used solely
for access to the portion of a lot used as a building site.
5~ord.X94-07 4
C. The minimum average width of that portion of a lot to be used as a
building site shall be thirty-five feet (35') with a minimum average depth of eighty feet (80').
That portion of a lot used for access on "flag" lots shall have a minimum width of twenty
feet (20').
D. The minimum frontage of a lot shall be forty feet (40'), except that lots
fronting on knuckles or cul-de-sacs may have a minimum frontage of thirty feet (30').
E. The front yard shall be not less than thirty feet (30'), measured from
the existing street line or from any future street line as shown in any Specific Plan of
Highways, whichever is nearer the proposed structure.
F. Side yards on interior and through lots shall be not less than five feet
(5'). However, if a zero lot line design is utilized, the alternate side yard may not be less
than ten feet (10'). Side yards on corner and reverse corner lots shall be not less than ten
feet (10') from the existing street line or from any future street line as shown on any Specific
Plan of Highways, whichever is nearer the proposed structure, upon which the main building
sides, except that where the lot is less than fifty feet (50') wide, the yard need not exceed
twenty percent (20%) of the width of the lot.
In addition, the following standard shall also apply:
AA. No lot shall have more than sixty percent (60%) of its net area covered
by buildings or structures.
(3) Except as provided above, all other zoning requirements shall be the same as
those requirements identified in Article VI of Ordinance No. 348.
e. Planning Area 5.
(1) The uses permitted in Planning Area 5 of Specific Plan No. 164 shall be the
same as those uses permitted in Article VI, Section 6.1 of Ordinance No. 348.
(2) The development standards for Planning Area 5 of Specific Plan No. 164 shall
be the same as those standards identified in Article VI, Section 6.2 of Ordinance No. 348,
except that the development standards set forth in Article VI, Section 6.2(a), Co), (c), (d),
and (e)(1) and (2) shall be deleted and replaced by the following:
A. Building height shall not exceed two stories, with a maximum height of
thirty-five feet (35').
5~ord.X94-07 5
B. Lot area shall be not less than four thousand (4,000) square feet. The
minimum lot area shah be determined by excluding that portion of a lot that is used solely
for access to the portion of a lot used as a building site.
C. The minimum average width of that portion of a lot to be used as a
building site shall be thirty-five feet 05') with a minimum average depth of eighty feet (80').
That portion of a lot used for access on "flag" lots shall have a minimum width of twenty
feet (20').
D. The minimum frontage of a lot shall be forty feet (40'), except that lots
fronting on knuckles or cul-de-sacs may have a minimum frontage of thirty feet (30').
E. The front yard shall be not less than thirty feet 00'), measured from
the existing sweet line or from any future street line as shown in any Specific Plan of
Highways, whichever is nearer the proposed structure.
F. Side yards on interior and through lots shall be not less than five feet
(5'). However, if a zero-lot line design is utilized, the alternate side yard may not be less
than ten feet (10'). Side yards on comer and reverse comer lots shall be not less than tea
feet (10') from the existing street line or from any future street line as shown on any Specific
plan of Highways, whichever is nearer the proposed structure, upon which the main building
sides, except that where the lot is less than fifty feet (50') wide, the yard need not exceed
twenty percent (20%) of the width of the lot.
In addition, the following standard shall also apply:
AA. No lot shall have more than sixty percent (60%) of its net area covered
by buildings or covered by buildings or structures.
(3) Except as provided above, all other zoning requirements shall be the same as
those requirements identified in Article VI of Ordinance No. 348.
f. Planning, Area 6.
(1) The uses permitted in Planning Area 6 of Specific Plan No. 164 shall be the
same as those uses permitted in Article VI, Section 6.1 of Ordinance No. 348.
(2) The development standards for Planning Area 6 of Specific Plan No. 164 shall
be the same as those standards identified in Article VI, Section 6.2 of Ordinance No. 348,
except that the development standards set forth in Article VI, Section 6.2(a),' (b), (c), (d),
and (e)(1) and (2) shall be deleted and replaced by the following:
5~ord,\94-07 6
A. Building height shall not exceed two stories, with a maximum height of
thirty-five feet (35').
B. Lot area shall be not less than four thousand (4,000) square feet. The
minimum lot area shall be determined by excluding that portion of a lot that is a used solely
for access to the portion of a lot used as a building site.
C. The minimum average width of that portion of a lot to be used as a
building site shall be thirty-five feet (35') with a minimum average depth of eighty feet (80').
That portion of a lot used for access on "flag" lots shall have a minimum width of twenty
feet (20').
D. The minimum frontage of a lot shall be forty feet (40'), except that lots
fronfing on knuckles or cul-de-sacs may have a minimum frontage of thirty feet (30').
E. The front yard shall be not less than thirty feet (30'), measured from
the existing street line or from any future street line as shown in any Specific Plan of
Highways, whichever is nearer the proposed structure.
F. - Side yards on interior and through lots shall be not less than five feet
(S'). However, if a zero--lot line design is utilized, the alternate side yard may not be less
than ten feet (10'). Side yards on corner and reverse corner lots shall be not less than ten
feet (10') from the existing street line or from any future street line as shown on any specific
Plan of Highways, whichever is nearer the proposed structure, upon which the main building
sides, except that where the lot is less than fifty feet (50') wide, the yard need not exceed
twenty percent (20%) of the width of the lot.
In addition, the following standard shill also apply:
AA. No lot shall have more than sixty percent (60%) of its net area covered
by buildings or structures.
(3) Except as provided above, all other zoning requirements shall be
the same as those requirements identified in Article VI of Ordinance No. 348.
g. Planning Area
(1) The uses permitted in Planning Area 7 of Specific Plan No. 164 shall be single
family residential and park.
(2) The development standards for Planning Area 7 of Specific Plan No. 164'shall
be as follows:
thirty-five feet (35').
Building height shall not exceed two stories, with a maximum height of
5\ords\94-07 7
square feet.
Lot area shall .be not less than Three Thousand Four Hundred (3,400)
C. The minimum width of a lot shall be Forty feet (40') and the minimum
depth shall be Eight-Five feet (85').
D. The minimum frontage of a lot shall be forty feet (40'), except that lots
fronting on knuckles or cul-de-sacs may have a minimum frontage of Fifteen feet (15').
E. Minimum yard requirements area as follows:
(1) The front yard shall be not less than Ten feet (10'), measured
from the front property line.
(2) Side yards on interior and through lots shall be not less than
Five feet (5'). However, if a zero-lot line .design is utilized, the alternate side yard may not
be less than Ten feet (10') from the existing side property line.
(3) The rear yard shall not be less than Five feet (5').
(4)
Pool setbacks shall be 3 feet for side yard and 3 feet for rear
yard.
Patio cover setbacks shah be 3 feet for side yard and 3 feet for
(6) Room/building additions shall adhere to the same setback
requirements as those of the main structures.
(7) Yard Encmachments. Where yards are required by this
ordinance, they shall be open and unobstructed from the ground to the sky and kept free of
all structural encroachments, except as follows:
a. Outside stairways or landing places, if unroofed. and
unenclosed, may extend into a required side yard for a distance of not exceed three (3) feet
and/or inw the required rear yard a distance of not to exceed five (5) feet.
b. Cornices, canopies, and other similar architectural
futures not providing additional floor space within the building may extend into a required
yard not to exceed one (1) foot. Eaves may extend three (3) feet to a required yard. One
(1) pergola or one (1) covered but unenclosed passenger landing may extend into either side
yard provided it does not reduce the side yard below five (5) feet and its depth does not
exceed twenty (20) feet.
5\ordsX94-07 8
F. Automobile parking shall provide one (1) two car garage per each
dwelling unit.
(3) Except as provided above, all other zoning requirements shall be the same as
those requirements identified in Ordinance No. 348.
h. Planning Area 8.
(1) The uses permitted in Planning Area 8. of Specific Plan No. 164 shall be single
family residential.
(2) The development standards for Planning Area 8 of Specific Plan No. 164 shall
be as follows:
A. Building height shall not exceed two stories, with a maximum height of
thirty-five feet (35').
B. Lot area shall be not less than Ten Thousand (10,000) square feet.
C. The minimum width of a lot shall be Eighty feet (80') and the
minimum depth shall be One hundred twenty five feet (125').
D. The minimum frontage of a lot shall be Eighty feet (80'), except that
lots fronting on knuckles or cul-de-sacs may have a minimum frontage of Twenty feet (20').
E. Minimum yard requirements area as follows:
(1) The front yard shall be not less than Twenty feet (20'),
measured from the front property line.
(2) Side yards on interior and through lots shall be not less than
Five feet (5'). However, if a zero-lot line design is utilized, the alternate side yard may not
be less .than Ten feet (10') from the existing side property line.
(3) The rear yard shall not be less than Twenty feet (20').
(4)
Pool setbacks shall be 3 feet for side yard and 3 feet for rear
yard.
Patio cover setbacks shall be 3 feet for side yard and 3 feet for
(6) Room/building additions shall adhere to the same sethack
requirements as those of the main structures.
5\orals\94-07 9
(7) Yard Encroachments. Where yards are required by this
ordinance, they shall be open and unobstructed from-the ground to the sky and kept free of
all structural encroachments, except as follows:
a. Outside stairways or landing places, if unroofed and
unenclosed, may extend into a required side yard for a distance of not exceed three (3) feet
and/or into the required rear yard a distance of not to exceed five (5) feet.
b. Cornices, canopies, and other similar architectural
features not providing additional floor space within the building may extend into a required
yard not to exceed one (1) foot. Eaves may extend three (3) feet to a required yard. One
(1) pergola or one (1) covered but unenclosed passenger landing may extend into either side
yard provided it does not reduce the side yard below five (5) feet and its depth does not
exceed twenty (20) feet.
dwelling unit.
Automobile parking shall provide one (I) two car garage per each
(3) Except as provided above, all other zoning requirements shall be the same as
those requirements identified in Ordinance No. 348.
i. Planning Area 9. (Commercial "B ")
(i ) The uses permitted in Planning Area 9 of Specific Plan No. 164 shall be the
same as those uses permitted in Article IX, Section 9.1 of Ordinance No. 348, except that
the uses permitted pursuant to Section 9.1(a)(1), (5), (6), (7), (9), (14), (15), (17), (22),
(23), (28), (29), (35), (39), (42), (45), (48), (49), (50), (51), (53), (54), (59), (61), (66),
(68), (69), (75), (77), (79), (80), (82), (84), (86), (89), (91), (92), and 03); and Co)(1), (3)
through (8), (10) through (12), and (14) through (20) shall not be permitted. In addition, the
permitted uses identified under Section 9. l(a) shall also include churches.
(2) The development standards for Planning Area 9 of Specific Plan No. 164 shall
be the same as those standards identified in Article IX, Section 9.4 of Ordinance No. 348,
except that the development standard set forth in Article IX, Section 9.4Co) shall be deleted
and replaced by the following:
A. The front yard shall be not less than twenty-five feet (25') and the rear
yard shall be not less than twenty feet (20'). The front sethack shall be measured from the
specific plan street line. The rear sethack shall be measured from the specific plan street
line. The rear setback shall be measured from the existing rear lot line or from any recorded
5\ords\94-07 10
B. There are no side yard requirements, except were the side yard abuts a
residentially zoned area, in which case buildings shall be set back twenty-five feet (25') from
the side lot line. Each side setback shall be measured from the side lot line, or from the
specific plan street line.
In addition, the following standards shall also apply:
AA. No lot shall have more than fifty percent (50%) of its net area covered
by buildings or structures.
BB. The minimum frontage of a lot shall be twenty-five feet (25').
CC. The minimum average width of that portion of a lot to be used as a
building site shall be twenty-five feet (25') with a minimum avenge depth of one hundred
feet .(100').
(3) Except as provided above, all other zoning requirements shall be the same as
those requirements identified in Article IX of Ordinance No. 348.
j. Planning Area 10. (Office)
(1) The sues permitted in Planning Area 10 of Specific Plan No. 164 shah be the
same as those uses permitted in Article IX, Section 9.1 of Ordinance No. 348, except that
the uses permitted pursuant to Section 9.1(a)(1), (5), (6), (7), (9), (14), (15), (17), (22),
(23), (28), (29), (35), (39), (42), (45), (48), (49), (50), (51), (53), (54), (59), (61), '(66),
(68), (69), (75), (77), (79), (80), (82), (84), (86), (89), (91), (92), and (93); and Co)(1), (3)
through (8), (10) through (12), and (14) through (20) shall not be permitted. In addition, the
permitted uses identified under Section 9.1 (a) shall also include churches.
(2) The development standards for Planning Area 10 of Specific Plan No. 164
shah be the same as those standards identified in Article IX, Section' 9.4 of Ordinance No.
348, except that the development standard set forth in Article IX, Section 9.4(b) shah be
deleted and replaced by the following:
A. The front yard shall be not less than twenty-five feet (25') and the rear
yard shall be not less than twenty feet (20'). The front setback shall be measured form the
specific plan street line. The rear setback shall be measured from the existing rear lot line or
from any recorded alley or easement; if the rear line adjoins a street, the rear setback
requirement shall be the same as required for a front setback.
B. There are not side yard requirements, except where the side yard abuts
a residentially zoned area, in which case buildings shah be set back twenty-five feet (25')
from the side lot line. Each side setback shall be measured from the side lot line, or from
the specific plan street line.
5~ords~94-07 ! 1
In addition, the following standards shall also apply:
AA. No lot shall have more than fifty percent (50%) of its net area covered
by buildings or structures.
BB. The minimum frontage of a lot shall be twenty-five feet (25').
CC. The minimum average width of that pertion of a lot to be used as a
building site shall be twenty-five feet (25') with a minimum average depth of one hundred
feet {100').
(3) Except as provided above, all other zoning requirements shall be the same as
those requirements identified in Article IX of Ordinance No. 348.
k. Planning Area 11. (Natural Open Space)
(1) The uses permitted in Planning Area 11 of Specific Plan No. 164 shall be the
same as those uses permitted in Article VHIe, Section 8.100 of Ordinance No. 348. In
addition, the permitted uses identified under Section 8.100(a) shall also include undeveloped
open space and public parks.
(2) The development standards for Planning Area 11 of Specific Plan No. 164
shall be the same as those standards identified in Article VIIle. Section 8.101 of Ordinance
No. 348.
(3) Except as provided above, all other zoning requirements shall be the same as
those requirements identified in Article VIHe of Ordinance No. 348.
Section 3. This Ordinance shall be in full force. and effect thirty (30) days after its
passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. The City. Clerk
shall publish a summary of this Ordinance and a certified copy of the full. text of this
Ordinance shall be posted in the office of the City Clerk at least five days prior to the
adoption of this Ordinance. Within 15 days from adoption of this Ordinance, the City Clerk
shall publish a summary of this Ordinance, together with the names of the Councilmembers
voting for and against the Ordinance, and pest the same in the office of the City Clerk.
5XordsX94-07 12
Section 4. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 8th day of Mare. h, 1994.
Ron Roberts, Mayor
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
. 5~ords\94-07 13
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify
that the foregoing Ordinance No. 94-07 was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading
at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 22nd day of February, 1994, and that
thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City
Council of the City of Temecula on the 8th day of February, 1994 by the following roll call
vote:
AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS:. Birdsall, Mufioz, Parks, Stone
NOES: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Roberrs
· ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
June S. Greek, City Clerk
5~ords\94--07 14
ITEM NO. 13
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY ~
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Gary Thornhill, Director of
March 8, 1994
Planni'~~L~
Contiguous Parcel Merger Ordinance
PREPARED BY:
David W. Hogan, Associate Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
It is requested that the City Council:
1. Open the Public Hearing and receive testimony;
2. Close the Public Hearing; and
3. Read by title only and introduce an ordinance entitled:
"AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA
AMENDING SECTION 16.7 OF ORDINANCE NO. 460 PERTAINING TO
THE MERGER OF CONTIGUOUS PARCELS"
BACKGROUND:
The current City (County) subdivision standards for merging adjacent parcels creates a process
which is inefficient, cumbersome, and inconsistent with the provisions of the Subdivision Map
Act. Currently, the City cannot efficiently merge properties which are covered with a single
development or are smaller than required by the zoning/development code. The proposed
amendment to Ordinance 460 would allow for the efficient merger of contiguous parcels either
at the request of the property owner or at the direction of the Director of Planning and meet
the requirements of the Subdivision Map Act.
DISCUSSION:
The State Subdivision Map Act sets specific standards for the provisions of merger ordinances.
No parcels may be merged unless there is a valid local ordinance which is consistent with the
requirements of the State Subdivision Map Act. The provisions for a 'city initiated parcel
merger are identical to the merger requirements contained in the Map Act.
The only component of the proposed ordinance which is not identical to the provisions of the
Subdivision Map Act is the section for a property owner initiated parcel merger. Based upon
an evaluation of the requirements of the Map Act, staff determined that the primary reason
for the detailed procedures was the need to ensure that the property owner was aware of the
City's intent to merge the parcels.
R:\STAFFRPT'~!ERGE.CC 3/1/9~ ktb 1
If the property owner has requested the merger, it is safe to assume that the property owner
-is aware of the merger. As a result, the merger process has be simplified by removing the
special noticing and hearing requirements from the proposed Ordinance. This approach has
been approved by the City Attorney. In his opinion, the streamlined merger standards for
owner initiated parcel merger is consistent with the requirements of the Subdivision Map Act.
The Planning Commission considered the proposed Ordinance on February 7, 1994. No one
offered testimony during the Public Hearing. The Commission then directed staff to further
clarify the definition of property owner and ensure that all the owners of the affected property
be notified of the proposed merger. The Planning Commission then adopted Resolution 94-04
recommending that the City Council adopt the proposed Ordinance.
The proposed Parcel Merger Ordinance will provide standards and requirements concerning the
merger of legally created and preexisting contiguous parcels. As a result, adoption of this
Ordinance does not have the potential to cause · significant impact on the environment.
Therefore, the Director of Planning has determined that the project is exempt from California
Environmental Quality Act, pursuant to Section 15061 (b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines.
GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY:
The proposed Parcel Merger Ordinance will support the General Plan by allowing for the
efficient utilization of adjacent or substandard parcels throughout the City. As a result, Staff
has determined that the proposed Ordinance is consistent the long-term goals of the City
General Plan.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The adoption and implementation of this Ordinance will not have a significant fiscal impact on
the City.
Attachments:
2.
3.
4.
5.
Ordinance - Page 3
PC Resolution No 94- - Page 10
Staff Report and Commission Minutes - Page 11
Current Parcel Merger Provisions - Page 12
State Standards for Local Merger Ordinances - Page 13
R:\STAFFRPT'%.IIERGE.CC 3/1/~ ktb 2
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
ORDINANCE NO. 94__
R:\STAFFRPT'q~ERC~E,CC 3/1/9~.' ktb 3
ORDINANCE NO. 94-
AN ORDINANCE OF Ts:FF~ CITY COUNCIL FOR THF~ CITY
OF TEMECULA AMENDING SECTION 16.7 OF
ORDINANCE NO. 460 PERTAINING TO THF~ MI~GER OF
CONTIGUOUS PARCH,8
The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby ordain as fonows:
Section 1. Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby makes the
following findings:
A. That the City Council is authox'iz. ed under Section 66451.11 of the Subdivision
Map Act ("Map Act"), to adopt a local ordinance regulating the merger of contiguous parcels
under common ownership;
B. That there are a number of parcels in the City of Temecula which are under
common ownership and that do not meet the minimum standards for the zoning district in which
they are located;
C. That there is a need in the City to provide an appropriate and effective method
to merge contiguous parcels to enable the appropriate development of these contiguous parcels;
D. That this Ordinance provides for the merger of contiguous parcels and will address
this problem; and,
E. That this Ordinance complies with all the applicable requirements of State hw and
local ordinances.
Section 2. Section 16.7 of Article XVI of Ordinance No. 460 is hereby mended in
full to read as follows:
"SECTION 16.7 MPRGER OF CONTIGUOUS PARCP]S.
A. PURPOSE. The purpose of this section is to pwvide pmcednres by which the City may
require or provide for the merger of two or more contiguous parcels under common ownership. '
This Ordinance has been adopted in COmplinnCe With the provisions of Sections 66451.11 of the
Subdivision Map Act and complies with the provisions of Sections 66451.10 through 66451.21
inclusive, of the Subdivision M~p Act, which pwvides the City with authority for the merger
of contiguous parcels.
B. WHEN PARCELS MAY BE M~GED. The Director of Planning or the owner of any
contiguous parcel may initiate the merger of any parcel which meets the requirements of
Subsection C. The Director of Phnning, Phnning Commi.sion or City Council may require the
owner of any contiguous parcel to request the merger of any or all contiguous parcels within the
boundaries of the Old Town Specific Plan in conjunction with the approval of any plot plan or
conditional use permit.
R:\STAFFRPT\MERGE.CC 3/1/94 ktb 4
C. lVn~Gt~ REQ~. The merger of a parcel with a contiguous parcel(s) may
only occur if aH the following requirements are satisfied:
1. If any contiguous parcels are held by the same owner or owners.
2. That at least one of the affected parcels is undeveloped and does not contain a
structure for which a building permit was issued or for which a b!~lding permit was not required
at the time of construction, or is developed only with an accessory structure or other structure
which is sited or partially sited on a contiguous parcel.
3. That one or more of the following conditions applies to the affected parcel:
a. At least one of the parcel(s) involved comprises less than S ,000 square feet
in area at the time of the determin3tion of merger.
b. The parcel was legally created in compliance with all applicable laws and
ordinances in effect at the time of its establishment.
c. The parcel does not meet slope stability standards.
d. The parcel does not meet current standards for sewage disposal and
domestic water supply.
e. The parcel has. inadequate access or provides for jn_~d_~late
maneuverability for motor vehicles or safety equipment.
f. The development of the parcel would create health and safety hazards.
g. The parcel is inconsistent with the City's General Plan, any approved
Specific Plan, or the provisions of the City's zoning and development code.
4. That the parcels when merged will not:
a. Be inconsistent or create a conflict with the City Zoning Ordinance or
General Plan, or any approved Specific Plan.
b. Create a conflict with the location of any existing structures.
c. Deprive or restrict another parcel of access.
d. Cream new lot lines.
D. CITY INITIATED ~GER.
1. Prior to merging any contiguous parcels, the ~ of Planning shall, by
Certified Mail to the ~ owner(s) of record at the address shown on the latest available
assessment role of the County of Riveaide, mail a Notice of Intent to Merge which notifies the
R:\STAFFRPT\NERGE.CC 3/1/W, ktb 5
owner(s) that the affected parcels may be merged pursuant to the provisions of this Section'. The
notice shall include the statement that the Owner(s) will be given the ~nity to request a
hearing and to present evidence that the proposed contiguous parcel merger does not meet the
criteria for a merger. For the purpose of this Ordinance, a property owner is any person
holding any portion of the rifle for any involved property.
2. The Notice of Intent to Merge shall be recorded with the Riverside County
Recorder on the d_n_t_e that the notice is given to all property owner(s) of record.
3. Within thirty (30) days of the recontafion .of the Notice of Intent to Merge, the
owner of the affected propcxty must file a request for a hearing regarding the proposed merger,
with the Planning Depamnent.
a. If the owner of the affected prope~ does not file a request for a heating
within the thirty (30) day time period specified above, the ~ of Planning shall determine
whether or not to merge the conliguous parcels. To merge contiguous parcels the Director of
Planning shah make the following findings:
i. The merged parcel complies with the appwyxiate pwvisions of the
Subdivision Map Act and all applicable City Requirements for the merging of contiguous
parcels.
ii. The merged parcel does not adversely affect the purpose and intent
of the City's General Plan or the public health, safety, and welfare.
b. If the owner of the affected lxope~ requests a heating on the merger,
then Phnning Commition, after a hearing, shall make the determination whether or not the
affected parcels are or are not to be merged.
4. The Phnning Department shatl set a time, date, and location for the heating upon
receiving a request for a heating from the property owner of the affected property or on the
thirty-first day following the recordatiou of the Notice of Intent to Merge. - The hearing shall be
conducted within sixty (60) days following the receipt of the owner's request, but may be
continued with the mutual consent of the Planning Commi.~sion and the property owner. Notice
of the hearing shah be given to the property owner(s) by Certified Mail.
5. At the heating the property owner shah be given the opportunity to present
evidence that the affected property does not meet the merger requirements set forth in this
Subsection C of this Section. At the conclusion of the hearing, the Planning Commi.~sion shah
make a determination to whether the affected parcels are to be merged or not to be merged. To
merge contiguous parcels the Planning Commi.~sion shall make the following findings:
a. The merged parcel complies with the app~ provisions of the
Subdivision Map Act and all applicable City Requirements for the merging of contiguous
R:\STAFFRPT~qERGE,CC 311194 ktb 6
b. The merged parcel does not adversely affect the purpose and intentof the
City's General Plan or the public health, safety, and welfare.
6. If the Plsnnitlg Commi.~4ion aletea'mines that the subject parcels shall be merged,
it shah cause the Notice of Intent to Merge to be recorded as provided for in Section 66451.12
of the Government Code. If notification cannot be made at the time of the hearing to the parcel
owner in pcrson, notification shall be lnado by Certified 1V[ail. The Commi.qion Shall notify the
owner of its' determination no later than five worirlnE days after the conclusion of the hearing.
7. If the Plsnning Commi.~sion determines that the parcels should not be merged, the
Commi.~sion shall insllllct the Diroaor of Plsnnlng to tElease the Notification of Intent to Merge
and mail a copy of the release to the property owner.
B. PROPBRTY OV~qBR REQ~~ MBRGER.
1. When the owner or owners of record of any contiguous parcel, as defined in
Subsection C, requests the merger of two or'more contiguous parcels, application shall be made
on the forms and in the manner specified by the Director of Planning.
2. Upon receipt of complete application requesting the merger of any contiguous
parcels, a Notice of Intent to Merge shall be recorded with the Riverside County Recorder and
a copy shall be sent to the property owner(s).
3. Within thirty (30) days of the recordation of the Notice of Intent to Merge, the
Director of Planning shall determine whether the affected parcels are to be merged. To merge
contiguous parcels the Director of Planning Shall make the following findings:
a. The merged parcel complies with the
Subdivision Map Act and all applicable City Requirements
parcels.
aFpropfiate provisions of the
for the merging of contiguous
b. The merged parcel does not adversely affect the purpose and intent of the
City's General Plan or the public health, safety, and welfare.
4. If the Director of Planning determines that the subject parcels shall be merged,
it shah cause the Notice of Merger to be recorded as pwvided for in Section 66451.12 of the
Government Code. If notification cannot be made at the time of the hearing to the parcel owner
in pen, notification shah be made no later than five working days after the conclusion of the
5. If the Direaor of Planning determines that the parcels should not be merged, the
Director of Planning shall release the Notification of Intent to Merge and mail 'a copy of the
release to the property owner.
R:\STAFFRPT\NERGE.CC 3/1/9~ ktb 7
P. BI:FBCTIV~ DATB OI: MvtRGt~. The merger of any contiguous parcels shall become
effective upon recordation of the Notice of Merger with the County Recorder. The Notice of
Merger shall specify the date of the Planning Commi~ion's aleremind'on, the names of the
recorded owners, and a legal description of the ~es.
G. APPEAL OF MBRG~. TIme appeal of the Plmmjn~ CommLqiou's delenninaHon to
merge coati~uous parcels to the City Council shall be made in accordan~ with the sppeal
provisions conwined in the Muuicipal Code."
Section 3. Severability The City Council hereby declares that the provisions
of this ~ce are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold
any sentence, paragraph, or section of this ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect
the validity of the remaining pa~ of this ordinance.
Section 4. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its
passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. The City Clerk shall
publish a summary of thi~ Ordinance and a certified copy of the full text of this Ordinances hall
be posted in the office of the City Clerk at least five days prior to the adoption of this
Ordinance. Within 15 days from adoption of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall publish a
summary of this Ordinance, together with the names of the Councilmembers voting for and
against the Ordinan~, and post the same in the office of the City Clerk.
Section 5. PASSlal, APPROV!a~, AND ADOPTIi]! this 8th day of March, 1994.
RON ROBBRTS
MAYOR
A'ITEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerl~
[SEAL]
R:\STAFFRPT\NERGE.CC 311/94 ktb 8
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
C1TYOFTBMECULA
I, June S. ~, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, Cnllfornia, do hereby certif7 that
the fomgoin_g Ontinsnc~ NO. 9 - was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at
a regular meeting of the City Council on the 8th day of March, 1994, and that thereafter, said
Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Temecula on the __ day of , by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCH-MEMBERS
COUNCHAiEMBERS
COUNCH-MEMBERS
IUNES. GI~PI~K
CITYCI-mRK
R:\STAFFRPT\HERGE.CC 311196 ktb 9
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 9404
R:\$TAFFRPT~IERGE.CC 31119~ klb 10
ATTA~ NO. 1
PC RESO~ON NO. 94-
A ms~OLtrrION OF Tm~ PLANNING COMMISSION FOR
~ CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMvNDING THAT ~
CITY COUNCIL ADOPT AN ORDINANCE ENTITL~, AN
ORDINANCE OF ~ CITY COUNCIL FOR Tifi?- crrY OF
I'~MECULA AMENDING SECTION 16.7 OF ORDINANCE
NO. 460 PERTAINING TO Tgr. -Ms31GER OF
CONTIGUOUS PAR(~n R*
codified Rivehide County OrdirmnceS, loCi,cling OrdinanCe NO. 460 ('An Ordinance Regulating
the Division of i ~nd"); and,
WH s'-cs'.4,S, inch zBgula~ms do not camin adequate provisions c:¢mc~nin$ the merger
of contiguous parcels; and,
WsE~tt&S, That there ate a number of ptr~s in the City of Temecula which are
under ~OmmOB ownetBhip add that do not meet the minimnm standards for the ZOning district
in which they are located; and,
Wus:um'.&S, That there is a need in the City .to provide an a~p,o~,iate and effective
method to merge contiguous parcels to enable the app, opx;ate development of these contiguous
parcels; and,
~E&S, That the City Coundl is authoaL~by Section 66451.11 ofthe Subdivision
Map Act, to adopt a local ordln, nce regulating the merger of contiguous pazcels; and,
WHKM~&S, That this Ordinance provides forthe merger of contiguous pa.rcds and will
address this problem; and,
WHs:gEAS, That this Ordinance complies with all the applicable requirements of State
hw and local orain~nc~s; and,
W~, notice of the pmpos~ Ovtltswe was posted at City Hall, County Li'bmry,
Rancho C, Mifcrmia Branch, the U.S. Post Offic~ and the Temecala Valley Chamber of
Commerce; and,
Wus:atEAS, a public heating were cond,,oted on February 7, 1994, at which time
interested persons had an oppommity to testify either in support or ~on.
NOW, I'HI~:MWkOR,~ ~ PLANNING COMMte, SION OF Tmr. CITY OF
TIMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOT,T OWS:
~SCtiOn 1. That the pinnnhlg Commiuion aftbe C~ of Temecula hereby finds that the
proposed Pazce/Mcrgcr Ofdhmn,'c w~l provide for the eStabHthmcm of effective zcgulations to
Section 2. That the yinnning COmmLe-SjOD of the City Of Temenda ~ finds that the
proposed Parcel Merger Ozxlln~nee will probably be ccmd-.q~ with the OM Town. Specific Plan
Section 3. That the pt~rmlng ~ommi~ion af the City of Temecula .further finds that the
prolx~sed Pawel Merger Ozdl,m,re is conelmmt with the General p!nn.
Seelion 4. That the Planning Commi.~sjon of the City of Temec-lsa finthE finds that the
proposed Pazcel Merger Ordinance does not have the potemdnl to oause a significam impacts on
Qual~ Act, as ,,mc,~'Jed, punuam to Section 15061 (b) (3).
Section 6. PASSED, APPROVEn, AND ADOPTED this 7th day of Febnary, 1994.
-SrisvRN J. FORD
C:HAIR~
I Hm:l,ncwlr ~TIIFY that the forego~ ReSOhltiOD was duly adopted by the Yhm,dng
Commi.~sion of the City of Temecula at a regular meetlug thereof, lmld on the ?th day of
Febnmry, 1994 by the following vote of the Commigsion:
AYP.5:
NOES:
ABStn'4T:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
GARY THORNroT I.
S1~ARY
.:~sr, n,F~m.nMemF_pc~ ~r~m4 km 5
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT AND MINUTES
R:\STAFFRPT\HERGE.CC 3/1/96 kLb 11
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
MEMORANDUM
Planning Commission
Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning
February 7, 1994
Contiguous Parcel Merger Ordinance
Prepared By: David W. Hogan
RECOMMENDATION:
ADOPT Resolution No. 94- entitled:'
"A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR THE
CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY.
COUNCIL ADOPT AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED AN ORDINANCE
OF THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA
AMENDING SECTION 16.7 OF ORDINANCE NO. 460
PERTAINING TO THE MERGER OF CONTIGUOUS PARCELS"
BACKGROUND
The purpose of this amendment to Ordinance No. 460 is to address problems with the current
parcel merger process which were identified during the approval of the Midnight Roundup.
The current City (County) subdivision standards for merging adjacent parcels creates a
process which is inefficient, cumbersome, and inconsistent with the provisions of the.
Subdivision Map Act. Currently, the City cannot efficiently' merge properties which are
covered with a single development or are smaller than required by the zoning/development
code.
DISCUSSION
The State Subdivision Map Act sets specific standards for the provisions of merger
ordinances. No parcels may be merged unless there is a valid local ordinance which is
consistent with the requirements of the State Subdivision Map Act. Based upon an evaluation
of the requirements of the Map Act, staff determined that the primary reason for the detailed
procedures was the need to ensure that the property owner was aware of the City's intent
to merge the parcels. The provisions for a city initiated parcel merger are virtually identical
to the merger requirements contained in the Map Act.
The only component of the proposed ordinance which is not identical to the provisions of the
Subdivision Map Act is the section for a property owner initiated pe~cel merger. If the
property owner has requested the merger, it is safe to assume that the property owner is
aware of the merger. As a result, the process can be simplified by removing the special
noticing and hearing requirements from the proposed Ordinance. This approach has been
approved by the City Attorney. In his opinion, the streamlined merger standards for owner
initiated parcel merger is consistent with the requirements of the State Subdivision Map Act.
R:%STA~E.PC11/25/94
The proposed Parcel Merger Ordinance would repeal the existing Section 16,7 and replace it
with the following:
Section A.
Section B.
Section C.
Section D.
Section E.
Section F.
Section G.
The purpose of the Ordinance;
Describes when parcels may be merged;
Provides the requirements which must be met to merge parcels;
Establishes procedures for City Initiated parcel merger;
Establishes procedures for Property Owner Requested parcel merger;
Describes when the parcel merger becomes effective; and,
Establishes an appeal process.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
The proposed Parcel Merger Ordinance will provide standards and requirements concerning
the merger of legally created and. preexisting contiguous parcels. As a result, adoption of this
Ordinance does not have the potential to cause a significant impact on the environment.
Therefore, the Director of Planning has determined that the project is exempt from California
Environmental Quality Act, pursuant to Section 15061 (b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines.
GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY
The proposed Parcel Merger Ordinance will support the General Plan by allowing for the
efficient utilization of adjacent or substandard parcels throughout the City. As a result, Staff
has determined that the proposed Ordinance is consistent the long-term goals of the City
General Plan.
FINDINGS
The proposed Parcel Merger Ordinance will provide for the establishment of effective
regulations to merge contiguous parcels when needed to ensure efficient land
development.
The proposed Parcel Merger Ordinance is consistent with the requirements of the State
Subdivision Map Act.
3. The proposed Parcel Merger Ordinance is consistent with the General Plan.
There is a reasonable probability that the proposed Parcel Merger Ordinance will not
interfere with' the future Old Town Specific Ran if it is ultimately determined to be
inconsistent with the policies contained in said Plan.
Attachments:
2.
3.
4.
PC Resolution No. 94- - Blue Page 3
CC Ordinance No. 94- - Blue Page 6
Current Parcel Merger Provisions - Blue Page 13
State Standards for Local Merger Ordinances - Blue Page 14
Ft:%STAFFRFq'VdBr.~LPC11/25/94 Idb 2
ATTACHMENT NO. 4
CURRENT PARCEL MERGER PROVISIONS
(ORDINANCE 460)
R:\STAFFRPT'~IERGE.CC 3/1/9~. kl.b 12
:aCTION 16.7. IqERGING OF CONTIGUOUS PARCELS.
Notwithstanding the precetlng sections, four or fear contiguous parcels
under camnon ownership may be merged without reverting to acreage, praytried
that the merger ts approved by the Pllnntng Director and In tnstnnent
evidencing such merger ts rlcorded with the County ionMr.
Applications to ee~e contiguous parcels shall be made to the Planntng
Dtrector on forms provided by the Plannt hlmrtment, and shall be
d
eccgapltshe by the fee slmmctfied tn Slctalan 17.1 of thts ordinance, and
the fol 1 owe ng:
An exhtbtt, drawn to scale, delineating tiredsting parcel beund/rtes
and the locatton of extstteg structures and erosants.
2. Cop4es of grant deeds for the existtrig parcels.
An exhtbtt, drawn to scale, deltneaMng the boundaries of the parcel
after the merger,
4. A legal description of the nay parcel as urged.
5. Preliminary tttle report.
6. tit1 tten consent of all owners of record Interest.
The Planntng DIrector shall transmit I cmpleted application to the County
Surveyor. for review and recamendmtIon end stall grant approval of the
request for merger tf:
The parcels to be merged are, at the time of merger, under cmmon
ownership and written consent Ms been obtatned frga 411 record
owners.
The larce~ as merged will be consistent with the zontng of the
property.
The larcel as merged will not con~tct with the location of any
extsttng structures on the property.
The parcel as merged will not be deprived access as a result of the
merger.
5. Access to the adjoining larcels will not be restricted by the merger.
No new lot 1tries are created through the merger.
The Pl anntng Dt rector shal 1 subrot t to the County Recorder for recordate on
the new legal description and exhibit within 20 days after it Ms been
approved by the Planntng Director.
A'i'I'ACHMENT NO. 5
STATE STANDARDS FOR LOCAL MERGER ORDINANCES
(STATE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT)
R:\STAFFRPT\NERGE.CC 3/1/~ ktb
I alropmtrlimittlmaufimrjtyofaltnlqencywamblviderw~mPeuto ~hefollowingl~or,~sawithin
(1) Lat ik~
I (2)~amp~dm~WOtCOfiU:fimlOfafinal0tplR:elnmp'
I, (5)Hssn~4s~s:cmswhichissdequsmf~rvehic~srs~dsafetye~i~s~msccessss~msntmve~bi~ity~
· (6) Itsd~.ve. iopmutwouldcxumisslshwssfcsyhsurds-
lot si~ s density mndm~
applicable Io ptn:r~ m be mespd.
This subdivism shall not spply ff one of the ftilowin~ conditions exist:
(A) OnorbefweJuly 1, 1981, cnewmmeofth~comiguous~t~unitsofiandisenfotcublYmminf~
set fwth in Sectim 421 o~lhgRgvtsu~"~d TssafionCodr-
(B) On July 1. 1981. cse~'nms=of ltm cmtig.y~,s pmuls er units oflsnd is fimbulmd ss dr/med in
subdivism (f) ofSo:fion Sll04, ctis landdevtged toan agfit-,mm,al useas defined in mbdivisim (b) of
51201.
(C) OnJuly 1. l~81.on~orma~offi~comi$uomlmu~sonmiuofLmii~kxmmiwill~2,(XX}fmtof
~mmim~nwh~chmn~mmm~ccum.~c.~lmimm.alremmm~emrm:m~umim--~e~-.--~mmd~w~m~mm.~rnm~
extra~ionisbeingmadepursutnttoaus~pennitismmdbYthelo~alaPttT.
19H FkmmlabZamWb and D&utnr
(D) Onluly l. 1981. o~ or mote of lM con*ig, melmam~etmimofland i$ kx:ammd within 2.(300 feetof
afutmmcmunmt~minmlexm.x" aismmdmmmomaplmftrwhichausepetmitotoiefPmnit
c.o,,i~4,.,. imrre__k or mira of !and ~
CalifominCommlAaof1976(Diviam2OoftlmPmbikP,:
alandusspim, lmmmadmbyfomalamimofmaC-,.o _:aComm!~purmmtmthspau/,aiom
ofthsCalifomiaCommlAaofl976inammmld~!qp~pemitdmcimmorinan mfF o~ullandme
plm~lsmlrmormM,,,vvodimmi,~'~" ""~ oa/dmfglmamaofalamimeplmpormm
Fa. lmmsesofpa,~,,,.~a(C),ml(D)ofthiswixlivi~m."mimn!~smm'me-,J~ -~"mems~s. oE.
hydmK.,mll:k~ Favel, or mad ea "1%
Note: Stm. 1984, Ch. 102, sbo fesds:
Ugsd0"~pm~ SEC.~.&itblh~inumtofth~vt~i.'-~em~,in~m~wM4~glMfuxt~of~inn6~dSl-llof~
devdopmmund~rthezouingotdmn~ofdmkx:alagm~applka~wanYmtlmuehermimoflmd.
ofl983andsla!lthefitmml~cm~ocdammcon,~lpfi,~admmgsikimt. asda?J&amYofPrse'i~nf~-
amending Semion66451.19, ofthe GowmunmuCode. mrelie~mmmlim ofthsobliF'km mmafia Pmeml
notkeofpomuial~inthatspm:if~no0c~m~mlmimimbegivmPmmmntmSmimmf~451-13
and 66451.19 ofthsGo~,,m,.~Code, am "msnded bY thb m-
adopt a ~ottlinan~ whkh complim with 'tlme lxumr~iom~and whkh my tMm
merger rr. ordm- of the ~onty in whkh the real ptupmY i$1ocami. anmkeofmetger~g~emmesdthe
~ ownm ~ psrtiodarly desm'bh~g the
(Arechad ~ Stars. 1984. C~ 102. ~]ecti~e .April 30. 198~. See no2s folio~ing SS 66~1.10 aed
66451 .]I.)
s,,a~ ,,.e ~m. t o.r 6~4SLl3. Priortorecordinganmi~of~,tbelocalammeYshaileamsmbemaBedbYmnifiedmm'lm
theowneroftheolmporumitytor~luemtabearingonda,-,,-inationofsmmamimlmmmt~tlmmat~
hearing tim the pmpmy does not meet the czimh for mergsr- The nmi~ of intmtio~ m 'd.~k,'-~ m
mhall be fried for nr.4xd with the reaxder of the county in whkh the ml proproy b izated ou ~mda~dm
(Amendsl by Stats. 1984, Ck l O2. Effective April' 30.1984. Ste notes foliow~ S~ ~$ l JO aul
6(,4~1.2 2.)
Owntr'snquttfor (a4$1.14. Atanydn~within30daysafm'.~c~d~ofd~nmi2ofimmimmde""wi~smm. lk~m
hsrkgon of0~tqmmipmpmymayfikwiththeloalqa'Yamlumtfwal2mingmdr-k.--' "'
da.... i..-4en of (Amtnded by $tats. 1984. Ch. 102. l~ctive Apra ~0. 1984:
sintaw 664~1.I1.)
66481.11Uim~gampmtforalmringmdr~,iami~ofmmfromthsomm'°fdmalimmmd
Hm~Wm propettylmmmutoSa:tim66451.14. thelo~alagem~shal!fixadms, dg. mdPlgsforalmmimgmb~
i .,. ,-..~ao! cudu, tcd bymskgimdvelxxiyormadvisutyapm~y, mishanmmifYtbePmlm~.owuerofthatfim~
~ · 1831': "l, ZemlmSamdD~a%,,, Midram
tm: wbic~ v~ u r t- ~d. or lor which me owmr hm Ryplied fer m lmiiding ps~*****~_ during ~ iMiod
between January 1. 1986. lnd IM effeglive dl~ d tbis ectim~
(Added I~ F,--. 1986, CL 727. ~ S-gt~ . H. 198S.)
6645L20. Prior lo PN'rd~r mmergero~dinu~which was in_ ** *- n mJmmm7 1, 1984. in otderlo bring
jlinm compihnce wilh Secdon66451.ll, tbe~,' .~.c body oflbe Jocmi mlency mbm!l xJoPtm f
30 days pdar m sdmxim d ~ madM ,- "
(Added I~ SuuL 1983, Ci~ 84~. See ,me ldb,inl &mien 6~1~0.)
(445L21.Prim'loO,eee_13t~ dsmm'germdi,Mar~k, cc, n& --*~wiihSectioa66451.11.by8cityarccxugy
mthavingamez~sr og!: -- -~ mJanum'y 1, 1984, 1be~kliskdve ixdy shdl adoPta,.: w~dmion oE immdm
mmJolxanefpmfN :emdfixadmemdp/geforaRMicbmri~ou~p,~,;~dadimn~which
legisladvebodyskdlcamsanoticedt2bmdngmbeppNaeh,'din~bemamerPmm'b~bYSmim6061.
(b)S,-,,.-m~nemdpImedmhmd~
(c) Smsdmat~hmdngdllu~v..w. dlxnmswm~head-
(Adde~ I~ Sum. 1983. CIL N~. See ms .[eWewk~ Sectkin 66151JOJ
(Secaion d6U12.~ tltmattla (~4~129 rel~ied by Sum. 1984. C~. 102. Effecaive Aprii 30. 1984.
following Sacdon ~4~ l J l.)
66OL30. Anypm~.borunitsoflandforwhichsnod2ofmerSerbadnotbemm:mdedmor~~
1, 1984, shdl bedmmednotmbav~meqed ffm3mu~ 1, 1984:
(a)'/klmcelmmseacbor~k~fo/Io--~4crim~
(l)~sikm~5,0OOsqusmhetinm
(2) Wss uemed in c,.-.,!~i- ~.c with ~ .... b hws mtd c,,dimnc~ in eff~m dme dme of its cremion.
(4) .Mau dope demiry mnakds.
(:5) Hu lepl xc~s which is Mequsm for vehicubr md Me~y e,q,.~,/m gcms mdu~
(6)~oflbepmrcelwouldam~nobe~horufetym
CT)Thoplrceiwouklbocon~ste~lwilh2PPPlicableFmra]Phnsmim~mPP~K'~bi~~2
(b) And. wizhrespectm sm:b pagel, nm~o~efollowiagco~uig
(l) On orbe~omJuly 1, 1981 ,one ormo~of2conligutmpsreelsorunilsoflmlisemfogs~Ys-dl~-2d
r. tfwthinSectim421 of~eRevetmeandTamimCode.
(2) OuJuly 1. 1981, one or mot~ of ~ cr~r,'-,~psrcels ot units of land is ~d~rlmd Is
mbdivisim(f)ofSecdon Sll04. oris hmd devo2d man agdculmml use as dsfined in aobd~a~m(b) d
Sec~on 51201.
tbesileouwhichmexisdngcou....-~hlmineulmmwceuau ':~" u~isbeingmd~wbelbsrornollb~
(4)On july I. 1981. oue ormm~oEIbe comipoas lmrc~or mits ofbnd is iocsmJ willn2~0fee~oE
afummcc, m,.,v.~alminnmlm :':fsimssshownonapimforwhichaumpennitwmlmrlmmi/
mmbmizinf~c~mlmin=~ruom~,~r"~hmsbanimmalbYm=iocmlmBm~.
( 5) W.nhin fim cmsml mam. m ddmM in Seaim ~O l O3 of t~ pultc l~ y v ~
anigums~w uniu disnd Ims, ln~wnJuly 1. lg~l, bmn idm~s.M wd~-~v~-,-d mtminld
i~t,,ffiCu,wltli,l=lOluRxxtrrsi~d-,i developme~sm:!wbemlbl~idemificllkmerd~*-~v,'"m;~J~hMejler(A)
been inclmkd in ~b~ !md me pim ponim of m iocal comal ProPmn PrePmed md m&~Nl Parmml m ed~
Calll'omi Cmslal Act d1976 (Dividm 20 d lbe Public Resmm:~ Code), or (B) !rkr lo lb~ m~ d
a lmd um pim, bem made by forml mkm of lkg ~ Comud Cow~ia~m Pumamt m lbs v'vr~°m
oflbe Ca!ffornia Comml Act o~1976 in acoami d~dop,,,ot pemd/~orin m ~k. ,,~.,d imd um
plan werkproFam crsnappmvaliuue Mm'-T~ "~ on whichdm pq._ v'D~daimdumplmpmsmm
mthopmvhimsoffi~CalifomiaCmsmAaisbamt
smndsdsforma.gerspecifsalinSectim66451-11-Atkt~.
(Amended
664~l~,l')wilhin the30.daypaiodspedfasd in Seaires 66451.14, thsosnffdom notfilearequutfora
~ in r- dm~ w~h Sa~m 66451.16, ~he ~ agm~ ma~, at an,/A~n~a~.~r~fmsiz a
detmninafionlhattho~ims:dssetobemaPloramnonobemerged- ' ' merger
ralu~d by Sa:fion 66~1.L5.
(Amended I~ $mu. 1984, C.k. 102. Fleeave ~ $0,1984. ~ aow. s.~liowinZ $ecr~n~ ~(~4~1JO and
~shall notbe metged, it shall mms lo b~nnmkdin lhs mmmff'l~'~in'~l in Ssnion664~l-12a
~ele~m~f~henodce~fim~ti~nmth~k""iz~~m.~aza~~dpursuanttoSecti~~6645~~~3~andshal~mail
iazr than lanuary 1, 19g6, m:otd anotieeofmetger fotany pan~!mergedltiormJanuarY 1, 1984. Af~e~
January 1, 1986, no par~l merged prior u>lamarY l, 1984, shall be comideml merged mlena notiz of
mcrger has L, e~__mmakdlxiztoJammzY l, 1986.
(b) Notwitlt~,-,s4i~g the pso,ia~xzs of Sections 664~51.12 to 664~1.1g, inclusive. a city or county having
arnergsr~ill~ieeg.~o6Jal~lazy l. 1984,11tly, t~llilJuly 1, 1984, cominue wdfecttbe merger
ofpan:elspmsmntto thattmiinm~.umlesstheparcetswouldbedmmednotmhavemaZedPmmmtt°tbe
criteriaspeci~edinSecti~6645~.3~.T~calag~ncysh~llre~an~c~dmergerfw~ypm~z~sma~ed
pmmmutothatmdinmce.
(c) Atleast30dayspriorto~anoticeofmergerPunummsubdivisim(a)°r(b),thel°calagmcY
time~d~te~~ndp~~ceatwhich~~~~wnermaypms~evidencem~h~~egisla~iveb~dy~r~dvis~ryag~ncyas
psr, eborunits, or m~ of them, umilnr-htb~sssh~lsn:~ormiu°fhndhsvebem~Y~~
(e) Thefaikaeofal~=alagencYtoaxnllYwiththemquirensmu°/anypd°rhwemblishingreq~
forthe merger of ctmtiguous prcels ot units of land held in ~ornmon ownenhip, shall nmd~r voidable any
acsims did notcoa~y wilh thelri~law, oracomemersaju~decladng lhat llgsCtims°fthe~
did not comply with ti21tior law, no fUrtlMS'JaOC~Cdh~r undm' tig ptovisioos of this division we local
comigutmpam~lsotuniu, otanyoflhem. untilmr. h timeasth~pan~lsotuninoflandha~been lawfully
664SLl~.(a)Coundmmots~an20,000squatsmilesinsizssha!lhamuntiUannarY 1, 1990,mg~mlanoti~
uni~n lhe noti~ofmerger h~been m:tmhsd ltitt mJanua~ I, 1990. Counlim m:mding nmioss of metget
(b)ThisseaionstmilnotbeapplimblemanYlmn:dsorunigss~fi~hmmtthsaim~°fmhdi~(a)
~.4s/,' -
ITEM NO. 14
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager n~~~,/
Gary Thornhill, Director of Plan
April 5, 1994
Ordinance Amending the Land Use Code Regarding the Term of Plot Plans,
Conditional Use Permits, and Public Use Permits
Prepared By: Debbie Ubnoske
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Read by title only and introduce an Ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 94-__
"AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING THE LAND USE CODE REGARDING THE
TERM OF PLOT PLANS, CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS,. AND
PUBLIC USE PERMITS.'
2. Adopt a Resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 94-
'RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF 'AN ORDINANCE
AMENDING THE LAND USE CODE REGARDING THE TERM OF
PLOT PLANS, CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS, AND PUBLIC USE
PERMITS. '
BACKGROUND
The Council requested staff to compile a list of applications that would be affected from this
change, which resulted in this item being continued from February 22, 1994, March 8, 1994
and April 8, 1994.
Attachment
1. Applications Potentially Affected by Ordinance (Chart) - page 2
2. Continued City Council Report dated February 22, 1994- page 3
· :'~T.A~'US~.CC2 3/29/94 vgw 1
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
APPLICATIONS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED BY ORDINANCE
MIIMORANDUM
FROM:
C ty Cmme C ty
DATE:
Council Requested Information Relative to Five Year Eam~o~ of Time for Plot
Plans, Conditional Use Permils, and Public Use Permits
Per your request at the City Council Re~rinI, February 7.2, 1994, please find enclosed
information relating to City approved proires that could benefit from the Council's adoption of
the additional time extension Ordinance, ('m Imlicular, Section 4 relating to the resurrection of
expired city approved projects).
Should you have any questions, or ff I can be of any s.~sistance, please feel free to contact either
me or my raft. at your conveni,~ce.
Attachments:
1. Five Year Extensions - page 2
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
FIVE YEAR I~'r~ONS
11001
11234
11339
11376
11604
11621
11759
11654
11767
4109191 Walsh
3/16/92 220 Unit
E.x.p. 3/16/93 Apt/Cond
6/19190 Ikdford
2~
Bpildings
5106191 Coop Auto
Exp. 5106193 Service Center
91,216 sq. ft.
6105190 De1 Hotel
2 story 7,992 sq.
Rnildings
9118190 Coast Line Equity
93,735 sq. ft.
Industrial Park
8/28/90 Koll Company
PhaseII
116,368 sq. ft.
Business Park
11192
11/30/90
1/01/91
South of'Margafita Road, arproximately 400 feet east'
of MomgaRmd and 550 feet north of Rancho
California Road.
(921-3~0-002,003)
Northwest cm'n~ of Rancho Califomia road and
Yn~z Road. ((1) buikling built)
Tow~~
North side of Rio Nedo. Street., 720 feet southwest of
(909-~)
West side of Front Street at,p,o~itrmtely 2300 feet
south of First Street.
Southeast comer of Ranclio Way and Business Park
Drive.
(921-020-061)
North of Winchester Road, west of Ynez Road.
(910-200-074)
Cimmino
17,352 sq. ft.
Industrial
Building
108,671 sq. ft.
2.53 acre,
warehouse
North side of Enterprise Circle south, south of
Winchester Road.
(909-270-023)
28705 Las l:tnciendi=.,
(921-050-016)
6 bay self serve
car wash
28853 Front Street (922-100-023) Approx. 1,150 sq.
ft..51 acres
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
CONTINUED CITY COUNCIL REPORT
DATED FEBRUARY 22, 1994
R:~ST~t.~n. CC2 3/l~N ~'W 3
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning ~;'p/
February 22, 1994
Ordinance Amending the Land Use Code Regarding the Term of Plot Plans,
Conditional Use Permits, end Public Use Permits
Prepared By: Debbie Ubnoske
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Read by title only and introduce an Ordinance entttled:
ORDINANCE NO.
"AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING THE LAND USE CODE REGARDING THE
TERM OF PLOT PLANS, CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS, AND
PUBLIC USE PERMITS."
2. Adopt a Resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 94-
'RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE
AMENDING THE LAND USE CODE REGARDING THE TERM OF
PLOT PLANS, CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS, AND PUBLIC USE
PERMITS. '
BACKGROUND
At the April 5, 1993 Planning Commission meeting, staff recommended the Commission
amend Ordinance 348 to allow for two additional one year extensions of time for Plot Plans,
Conditional Use Permits, end Public Use Permits. At this meeting, the Commission exl~essed
a concern relative to extending the life of permits they had never seen and requested staff
research the number of Council approved projects which had not expired and bring it beck to
the Commission. Staff researched City approvals for the period from April 1990 to June
1990 which was the period of time the City Council acted solely to approve or deny projects.
During this period, the City Council acted on eight County transferred plot plans and no
conditional use permits or public use permits. Of the eight plot plans acted on, all have either
been constructed or have expired. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission meeting,
the Planning Commission directed staff to prepare an Ordinance providing for two additional
years to allow applicants additional time to construct their projects. Commissioner Hoagland
was opposed to such an Ordinance. He felt giving applicants an additional two years was not
in the City's best interest.
At the December 6, 1993 Planning Commission meeting, the Ordinance was presented and
approvad by the Commission three to one with Commissioner Hoagland in opposition.
Pursuant to prior Council direction, Section 4 of the attached Ordinance allows permittees to
request reinstatement of expired City approved applicationS. within six months of the date the
Council adopts this Ordinance. The reinstatement hearing will be conducted by the Planning
Director. For example, if the City had approved a conditional use permit on the date of
incorporation, December 1, 1989, the permit would have expired on November 30, 1991.
Under Section 4 of this Ordinance, the Planning Director could grant the permittee up to three
one-year extensions of time. The effect of this would be to extend the permit to November
30, 1994. If the conditional use permit had been approved on December 1, 1990 and had
expired on November 30, 1992, the Planning Director could now grant two additional
extensions in the following years to extend it up to November 30, 1995.
Staff will contact all applicants who will be able to avail themselves of these additional time
extensions.
FISCAL IMPACT
Adoption of this Ordinance could result in a positive fiscal impact in that it will provide
businesses additional time in which to obtain funding and begin construction of their projects.
Attachments:
Resolution No. 94-__- Page 3
Ordinance No. 94- - Page 6
Planning Commission Staff Report - Page 11
R:~ST,~,R~rr~d~DUU. CC 2/14~ O, 2
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
RESOLUTION NO. 94-
RESOLUTION NO. 94-
RF, SOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA RECOMMENDING A1X)PTION OF AN
ORDINANCE AMENDING THE 1AND US"'E CODE'
REGARDING THE TERM OF PLOT PLANS,
CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS, AND PUBLIC USE
WHB~E/~S, City Ordinance No. 90-04 adopted by reference certain portions of the non-
codi~ed Riverside County Ordinances,. including Ordinance No. 348 ('Land Use Code"); and
WHEREAS, such regulations provide for extensions of time for plot plans, conditional
use permits, and public use permits; and
WHEREAS, the City of Temecula wishes to provide for an additional period of time to
allow for the development of approved projects; and
W!tEREAS, a public hearing was conducted on December 6, 1993, January 7.5, 1994
and February 22, 1994 at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in
support or opposition; and
WHEREAS, notice of the proposed Ordinance was posted at City Hall, County Library,
Rancho California Branch, the U.S. Post Office and the Temecula Valley Chamber of
Commerce; and
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOIJOWS:
Section 1. That the City Council of the City of Temecula hereby finds that there are no
County cases remaining that would be able to avail themselves of these additional extensions of
time.
Section 2. That the City Council of the City of Temecula hereby finds that the pwpos~
Ordinance providing for two additional one year extensions of time will benefit businesses in the
City of Temecula.
Section 3. That the City Council of the City of Temecula hereby finds that this
Ordinance is exempt through Section 21080 of the California Environmental Quality Act.
Seaion 4. That the City Council of the City of Temecula hereby recommends adoption
of the proposed additional extension of time Ordinance. The Ordinance is incorporated into this
Resolution by this reference.
Section S. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this. 22nd day of February, 1994.
RONA~ .n ROBERTS
MAYOR
I HERF. ny CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City
Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 22nd day of February,
1994 by the following vote of the Council:
AYP. S:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNTERS:
COUNTERS:
COUNCIL~n~,fi~ERS:
JUNE S. G~PPK
CITYCLERK
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
ORDINANCE NO. 94-
ORDINANCE NO 94-_
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY
OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE LAND USE CODE
REGARDING THE TERM OF CONDITIONAL USE
PEILMITS, PUBLIC USE PERMITS AND PLOT H.,ANS
~ CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Article XVHI, Section 18.30(0 of Riverside County Ordinance No.
348, as adopted by rderence pursuant to City Ordinance No. 90-04, and as amended pursuant
to City Ordinance No. 91-09, is hereby amended to read as fonows:
'f. APPROVED PERIOD. The approval of a plot plan shall be valid for a
period. of two years from its effective date within which time the construction
authorized must be substantially begun or the occupancy authorized be in use;
otherwise, the approval shall be void and of no further effect.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the permittee may, prior to the expiration of the
plot plan, apply for up to three (3), one (1) year extensions of time in which to
use the plot plan. Each extension of _time shall be granted in one (1) year
increments only.
An application for an extension of lime shall be made to the Planning Director,
on forms provided by the Planning Departnumt and shall be filed with the
Planning Department, accompanied by ~ appropriate filing fee. Within thirty
(30) days following the filing of an application for an extension of time, the
Planning Director may approve, conditionally approve or deny the application.
An extension of time may be granted by the Planning Director only upon a
determination that the pfoyaty and use are ccm~_qent with the General Plan,
Land Use Ordinance, and all other City Ordinances. and regulations. If an
extension is granted, the total time allowed for use of the approval shall not
exceed a period of five (5) years, calculated from the effective date of the
approval.
The term *use' shall mean the beginning of a substantial construction of the use
that is authm'ized, which construction must thereafter be pursued diligen~y to
completion, or the actual occupancy of existin~ buildings or land under terms of
the authorized use. The effective date of a plot plan shall be deUn'mined pursuant
to Section 18.26 of this Ordinance.*
~:~srAmm~mcc 2n4s4 ,~ 7
Section 2. Article XVIH, Section 18.28(0 of Ordinance No. 348, as adopted by
reference pursuant to City Ordinance No. 90-04, is hereby amended to read as follows:
"e. -APPROVED PERIOD. The approval of a conditional use permit shah be
valid for a period of two years from its effective date within which time the
consmactitm authorized must be substanaally. begun or the occupancy authorized
be in use; otherwise, the approval shah be void and of no further effect.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the permittee may, prior to the expiration of the
conditional use permit, apply for up to three (3), one (1) year extensions of time
in which to use the plot plan. F~,eh extension of time shah be granted in one (1)
year increments only.
An application for an extension of time shall be made to the Planning Director,
on forms puntided by the Planning Department and shall be filed with the
P|~mning Department, accompanied by the appropllnte filing fee. Within thirty
(30) days foliowing the filing of an application for an extension of time, the
Planning Director may approve, conditionally approve or deny the application.
An 'extension of time may be granled by the pIx~nnlng Director only upon a
determination that the property and use are consistent with the General Plan,
Land Use Ordinance, and all other City Ordinances and regulations. If an
extension is granted, the total time allowed for use of the approval shall not
exceed a period of five (5) years, calculated from the effective date of the
approval.
The term "use" shall mean the beginning of a substantial construction of the use
that is authorized, which construction must thereafter be pursued diligen~y to
completion, or the actual ~ of existing buildings or land under terms of
the authorized use. The effective date of a conditional use permit shall be
determined pursuant to Section 18.26 of this Ordinance."
Section 3. Article XVIH, Section 18.29(e) of Ordinance No. 348, as adopted by
reference pursuant to City Ordinance No. 90-04, is hereby mended to read as follows:
'e. APPROVED PERIOD. The approval of a public use permit shall be valid
for a period of two years from its effective date within which time the
construction authorized must be substantially begun or the occupancy authorized
be in use; otherwise, the approval shall be void and of no further effect.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the petmitt~ may, prior to the expiration of the
public use permit, apply for up to three (3), one (1) year exUmsions of time in
which to use the plot plan. Each extension of time shah be granted in one (1)
year increments only.
An application for an extension of time shall be made to the Planning ~,
on forms provided by the Planning Department and shall be filed with the
Planning Department, accompanied by the appropriate filing fee. Within thirty
(30) days following the filing Of an application for an extension of time, the
Planning Director may approve, conditionally approve or deny the application.
An extension of time may be granted by the Planning Director only upon a
determination that the prope~y and use are consistent with the General Plan,
Land Use Ordinance, and all other City Ordin3nces and l~gUla~OnS. If an
extension is granted, the toUd time allowed for use of the approval shall mX
exceed. a period of five (5) years, calculated from the effective date of the
approval.
The term "use" shall mean the beginning of a substantial construction of the use
that is authorized, which construction must thereafter be pursued diligcn~y to
completion, or the actual occupancy of existing buildings or land under terms of
the authorized use. The effective date of a public use permit shall be determined
pursuant to Section 18.26 of this Ordinance."
Section 4. Notwithstanding the above, any plot plan, conditional use permit or
public use permit which the City approved since incoxporation and which has expired, may be
reinstated pursuant to the procedure set forth above. In order to zcinstate any such permit, the
permittee must make an application to reinstate within 180 days of the effective date of this
Ordinance.
Section 5. Sevemb'~i~. If any provisions of this Ordinance or the application
thereof to any period or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other
provisions or applications, and to this end, the provisions of thi~ Ordinance axe dcc]al~d to be
sevemble.
Section 6. This Ordinance sh311 be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after
its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. The City Clerk shah
publish a summary Of this Ordinance and a ceriified copy of the full text of tixis Ordinance shall
be pesteel in the office of the City Clerk at least five days prior to the adoption of this
Ordinance. Within 15 days from adoption of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shah publish a
summary of this Ordinance, together with the names of the Councilmembers voting for and
against the Ordinance, and pest the same in the office of the City Clerk.
ATTEST:
Ronald Roberrs, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
R:XSTAJnmPrU,ANDUSB.CC 2/15~s ~ 9
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )
CITY O1~ TEMECULA )
I, June S. GnU, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby
certify that the foregoing Ordlnnnce No. 9~_ was duly introduced and placed upon its first
reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the day of , 1994, and that
thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted snd passed at a regular meeting of the City Council
of the City of Temecula on the__ day of , 1994, by the following roll carl vote:
COUNTERS:
NOES:
COUNt:
COUN_c~AIBMBERS:
R:WrA~nFnLANDUS~.CC 2ns/~ ~ 10
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
M!gjIORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Planning Commission
Gary Thomhill, Director of Planning~'~'
December 6, 1993
Ordinance Amending the Land Use Code Regarding the Term of Plot Plans,
Conditional Use PermitS., sod Public Use Permits
Prepared by: Dabble Ubnoske
RECOMMENDATION:
RECOMMEND Adopting Resolution 93-
adoption of an Ordinance entitJed:
recommending
"AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING THE LAND USE CODE REGARDING THE
TERM OF PLOT PLANS, CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS, AND
PUBUC USE PERMITS."
BACKGROUND
AT the April 5, 1993 Planning Commission Meeting, staff recommended .that the Commission
amend Ordinance 348 to allow for two additional one year extensions of time. Some
concerns were expressed by the Commission at the meeting relative to extending the life of
projects the Commission had never seen.
Staff researched CiW approvals for the period from April 1990 to June 1990 which was the
period of time the CiW Council acted solely to approve or deny projects. During this period,
the City Council acted on eight County tTansferred plOt plans. No conditional use or public
use permits were acted on. Of the eight plot plans acted on, all have either been constructed
or have expired.
At the conclusion of the Planning Commission Meeting, the Planning Commission directed
staff to prepare an Ordinance providing for two additional yeare to allow applicants additional
time to construct their projects. Commissioner Hoegland was opposed to such an Ordinance.
He felt giving applicarrr~ an additional two yeare was not in the City's best interests.
DISCUSSION
It is staff's opinion that the five year approval process would benefit businesses by providing
them additional time in which to omain funding and begin construction, It is further staff's
opinion that there are no cases remaining from the County which would be able tO avai!.
themselves of this additional time,
Section 4 of me attached Ordinance allows permittees to reaues~ reinstatement of expired
City approved applications within six months of me date the Council adopts this Ordinance.
The reinstatement hearing will be conducted by the Planning Director. For example, if The City
had aDproved a conditional use permit on the date of incorporation, December 1, 1989, the
permit would have expired on November 30, 1991. Under Section 4 of this Ordinance, the
Planning Director could gram the permittee up to three one-year extensions .of Time. The
effect of this would be to extend the permit to November 30, 1994. If the conditional use
permit had been approved on December 1, 1990 and had expired on November 30, 1992, the
Planning Director could now gram one extension at this time to extend the permit to
November 30, 1993, and then gram two additional extensions in the following--years to
extend it up to November 30, 1995. ...
ENVIRONMENTAL DEiIRMINATION
Adoption of this Ordinance is exempt throUgh Section 21080 of the Califomia Environmental
Quality Act.
Attachments
Resolution No. 93~- Blue Page 3
Ordinance No. 93- - Blue Page 6
Idle
ATTACHMENT NO. '1
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
R:~T PC 11/21/13 Idle 3
RESOLUTION NO. ~
I~ROLUTION OF THE PIANNING CO1VIMISSION OF ~
~ OF TINECIXA RECO~ING ~ crrY
COUNCIL ADOPT. AN ORDINANCE AMENDiNG Tnx
LAND USE CODE REGARDING TnT. TERM OF FLOT
PLANS, CONDmONAL USE FERMrrS, AND PLrSLXC USE
~~.4S, a public heazing was ¢o-~ct~ on D~cemb~r 6, .1993, at which
intcres'tr. zl persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition; and
wn-n~u~, notice of the F, OpOsedt Oraln--ce was posted at City Fr=n, County Library,
./--lancho C~lifomia Branch, the U.S. Post Office and the Temecula Valley Chamber of
~mmerC. c; and
NOW, ~K'~ORE, ~ PLANNING COMMISSION OF TnT. CITY OF
TEVIECULA DOES RESOLVE, DE'rERMIN~ AND ORDER AS FOI-I-OWS:
Seaion 1. That the Planning Commission of the City of Ternec-}~ hereby fuels thai
at= no County cases l~mninlng thai wouAd be able to avail themselves of these additional
extensions of rime.
Seaion 2. That the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula here~ finds that the
proposed Ordinance pwvHi-g for two additional one year ~-sions of time will benefit
businesses in the City of Temecula.
Section 3. Tha~ the Planning Commission of the City of Temecuh hex~y finds flit
Ordinance is exempt through Seaion 21080 of the C~,llfornia E. mrizonmrn-1 Q.,dlty Act
Seaion 4. That the Planning Cm-mi.~sion of the City of Temecula ~ recommends
to the City Council adoption of the proposed additional ertl~o~ of lime Onti-=-c~. The
Ordhl3/tCC is izlcorJ)oraEed into thi_~ Rcsolufion by thi,~ rdezen~ and marked Exhibit "A" and
datexi December 6, 1993, for iden~on. . .
./~---
R:II, S'rA .... I~: 11r~/93 idle
4
Seaion 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 6tb day of December, 1993.
~ F. FORD
_r'~a. IRMAN
AYES:
NOF.,S:
'ABSENT:
PLANNING COlV~SIONIEI~:
PLANNING COlVfiVD~SION]EP-S:
PLANNING CO1VIMISSION]t~:
SECRETLY
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
ORDINANCE NO.
R:NSliTA,.,.,'~:'T%LAIINILleC 11~9/13 idle
ORDINANC~ NO 93-_
AN ORDINANCE OF TKE CITY COUNCIL OF Tm~. ClTY
OF TEMECULA AMENDING TEE LAND USE CODE
P, EGARDING TRY, TERM OF CONDITIONAL USE
TKE CITY COUNCIL OF ~ ~ OF T~viECULA DOES n'k-n~ay
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Azlicle X'VIII, Section 18.30(t') of Riversid~ County Ovi;-,,,,ce No.
348, as adopted by refm'en~ pm'suant w C.:a'y Oralr.,r,,-e No. 90-04, and as ,,mrpded pursuam
to City Ox~ir,~n~e No. 91-09, is lm-.by ?m,m,~,~ to zmd as follows:
'f. APPROVED FKRIOD. The appwval of a plot plan shall be valid for a
period of two yean from ~ gffective daze w~h~ which time the consuuaion
aurtn4zcd mu~ be subs~m~=ny begun or the occupancy antb~ be in use;
otherwise, the approv~ ,h~n be void and of no furor effect.
NOtwith.~r=rHinE the foregoing, the l,c,...;-~c may, prior w the expizadon of the
plot plan, apply for.up w ttn~ f3), one (1) year e~r, msions of time in which w
use the plot plan. Each err~n~cm of dine shall be gran~ in one (I) year
incr~mems only.
An applicazion for an cxumsion of ~me shall be made w the Planning Director,
on forms pwvidr. d by the .p!=.~r~ Depanmenn and sbaI1 be filed with the
plnn,ing Deparune~ accoml~ded by the al~yxop~qze filing fee. Within thiz~
(30) days foBowing the fi/ing of an atupBca~on for an gngnsion of ~ime, the
planning Dizeaor my approve, condidomlly alcove or deny the application.
· An extension of time my be granted by the p!~nflng Dizeclxn' only upon a
determination that the ytopc~y and use are coe-~i~.er~ with the General Plan,
I~nd Use Oralinane=, and all other City Orrlin=nces and re~m,i=tirms. If an
extension is granted, the toutl time allowed for use of the atoproyal shall not
e. xccgd a pcziod of five (5) years, ~ind=,-d fxom the dfcctive date of the
approval.
The u=m "use" sba/1 mean fiae b¢~;.,d;.~ of a sub~ua~ consm~aion of ~e ~
~ h n~, w~ c~z m~ ~~ ~ ~ dm~y w
w S~ 18.26 d ~ ~i,,,~.'
Seaion 2. Article XVIII, Seaion 18.28(f) of Ord~s,,ce No. 348, as adopted by
r~ference pursuan~ to City Or~h,,mce No. ~)-04, is tzreby amended zo read as follows:
"e. APPROVED PERIOD. The ~pwval of a wnditio~ use permit shall be
valid for a period of two yentts ~ its effeaive date wirhi~ which time the
consm~aion sutlzzizzd must be ;,b.~.~.d;,ny begun or'tbe c~:cul~-~y. suthozized
be in use; otherwise, tiz zpptoval ~hnrl be void and of no further effect.
~ al:rplicsXion fcyr an e~sicm d time sixall be ,v,,.~_ to ~ l~.ndnE Dix~,
on fonns ~ by ~ Pi~-,,+,,.- Depsmnent and shall be filect with the
p},,v,nlng Dq:m~mexX, acco..,s~ied by the .+,+,,.,+,,2ar~ fnh, g fee. Within thirty
('30) days following tlz f;lin,; of an application for an e:n=nsion d time, the
plnrmln~ ~ may ~, conditionally q:qn'ove or deny the application.
An enension of tlmc may be s,-.nt/~ by the Planning Director only upon a
detemination that the p, oi/-,,Y and use are consistent with the General Plan,
Land Use Ordln.nce, and all other C..ky Ordin-nCeS and zegulati~. If an
cxc~d a period of five (5) y~trs, calcuhted from the effective date of the
approval.
The term "use" Sh.n mean the bet, inning of a substantial construction of the use
thsz is authorized, which construction must thereafter be pursued dfligen~y to
completion, or the actual ocatpancy of e.,d-elng buildings or land under terms of
th~ authorized use. The effective date of a conditional use permit sb.n be
demrmined pureant to Seaion 18.26 of ~i, Ordinance."
Seaion3. Article XVIII, Section 18.29(e) of Ordinanc~ No. 348, as adopted by
r~f=r~ncc puz~uant to City orr"n.n-e No. 90-04, is hereby mended to read as follows:
"e. APFROViD PKP, IOD. The approval of'a public use permit sb-n be valid
for a period of two years from in effeclivc daze widdn which lime the
consh-uclion autho~ed must be subsmvH=ny begun or the occupancy authorized
be in use; othcrwisc, the approval sh~n be void and of no further effea.
N0twirhS~ndlng the foxt~in~, the pc~u~r~ may, pd~ w ~ ~on of ~
pub~ ~ ~, ~ly for ~ w ~ ~), = (1) y~ ~ d ~e ~
w~ch w ~ ~ p~ p]~". ~ ~ of ~e s~n ~ ~ h ~ (1)
y~ ~en5 o~y.
R:%$~STA~ 11/29/93 IdlB 8
(30) days following the ~l:mg of an app.,--rlo,, for an extg~on of mc, thc
E: ,m~,E ~ my gppmvc, condifiom.Dy at]prove or dgny the applit:ation.
An extension of dine may be _ormnt~ by'the pi-nn;ng Dizlg:mr oDly upon* a
detezmin~rrlon that the p~opc~y and use az~ con*gi-grrnr with the Genera.1 Plan,
T ned USe OrriirmnC~, a/IC[
ex-r~sicm is granted, the total ri,,,c alloweel for use'of the approval sha.U not
exceed a period. of five (~ yean, c~k~nn~.t from tt~ effective date of the
The tenn 'use" 'shall mean the beEimdng of a v,br~,nd.~ construction c~f the use
that is autbozized, which consgrug/ion must thuu. Et~ be pursued dfi~ge:ntly to
CODZp]Lefi05, O~ tile acDlaJ OCCtXID~nCY Of e~-i-,.'ing ~riidlnp Or ]lzzd uDc~r ~ of
t. bc aUtzo~z~ use. Tb~ effec~ve dalg of a public use permi~ _,h,n be der.=mi-ed
pursuant m Section 18.26 of ,hi.~ OV'iin,n~."
Section 4. NOtwirh-randlng the above, any plot plan, conditional use permit or
public use p~nit which the City appmved since inco,po,d/jon and which has expire, may be
reinstated pursuant to the procedure set fcr~ above. In order to rrlnsr~te any such permit, the
permince must makg an application to l~i,~-r~re, ~ 180 days of the effective date of
Ord~.~ce.
Seaion 5. Sever-hfiiU. If any provisiom of thi~ C)ZHh~rre or the app]icazion
therr. of to any period or cizD,m-e~-c~ is hfJd invalid, such invalidity stroll not affea other
provisions or applications, and to this end, the provisions of thi.~ ~ce az~ cieclar~ to be
et:,,~.~I'AF;IIPT,d. Alqa:NJIE. PC 11r~la
9
~une S. Gx~k, Ci~ Clerk
[SSAL]
STATE OF C.a ~ -T=ORNIA )
COUNTY OF RlVSBS)DI~ )
c1~ OFT~SCTjI~ )
I, June S. 0zeek, City Cleric of the City of
~-r~Fta, said Ord~---ee was du~ sdoped and passed at a reSu~ ,~ee,~ d the C~ Council
of the City of Temecuh on the __ day of ,1993, by the following roll call vote:
COUHCT'r MEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNTERS:
COI.TNGI.,.MEMBEILS:
,:ms.r,L, wwwjNo~s,c ,/=ss3 ,.,,. 10
ITEM NO.
15
APPROV/~ T,
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
City Manager/City Council
FROM:
Mary Jane McLarney, Finance Officer
DATE:
March 8, 1994
SUBJECT:
Inducement Resolution/TEFRA Hearing
RECOMMENDATION:
Read by title only and introduce an Ordinance entitled Ordinance
No. 94-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA,
CALIFORNIA, DECLARING THE NEED FOR AN
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, AND
DECLARING THAT SUCH AUTHORITY SHALL
FUNCTION WITHIN THE CITY
Adopt a resolution entitled Resolution No. 94-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA, ON BEHALF OF THE
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA, · ACCEPTING THE
APPLICATION OF TENSION ENVELOPE
CORPORATION
DISCUSSION: The City has been approached by Tension Envelope Corporation to issue
Industrial Development Bonds to finance their new facility in Temecula. In order to do so City
Council must adopt the attached Resolution No. 94- and Ordinance No. 94- to activate an
Industrial Development Authority and accept an application from the company.
Attachments:
Resolution No. 94-
Ordinance No. 94-
ORDINANCE NO., 94-_
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL 0F THE CITY
OF TEMECIIA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING THE NI;IEB
FOR AN INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,
AND DECLARING THAT SUCH AUTHORITY SHALL
FUNCTION ~ THE CITY
The City Council of the City of Temecula, California (the "City"), does ordain as
follows:
Section 1. Findingg.
1.1 Them exists within the City of Temecula economically distressed areas
which may be bene~ted by efforts to prevent the loss of erAsting jobs and to create new jobs.
1.2 The health, welfare and safety of the people of the City make it
necessary to provide an alternative method of financing certain facilities in order to prevent
the loss of existing jobs within the City, and increase employment opportunities, and
otherwise contribute to the economic development of the City.
1.3 The California Industrial Development Financing Act, California
Government Code Sections 91500 and following ("the Act"), has created within the City a
public, corporate instrumentality of the State of California, known as the Industrial
Development Authority of the City of Temecula ("the Authority"), to exercise such powers
and accomplish such purposes as may be granted an set forth in the Act.
1.4 Section 91520 of the Act provides that the Authority shall not transact
any business or exercise any powers under the Act unless, by Ordinance, the City Council
declares that there is a need for the Authority and that the Authority shah function.
Section 2. Declaration of Need for Authority.
2.1 The City Council hereby finds and declares, within the meaning of
Section 91520 of the Act, that there is within the City a need for an industrial development
authority.
2.2 The City Council hereby further finds and declares that the Authority
shah function within the City.
2.3 The Authority is hereby empowered to transact business and to exercise
all powers as permitted by law.
Section 3. Referendum.
5\ords~authority I
3.1 Pursuant to Subdivision (b) of Section 91520 of the Act, this Ordinance
is subject to the provisions for referendum set forth in Article 2, commencing with Section
4050, of Chapter 3 of Division 5 of the California Election Code.
Section 4. Notice of Ad~otion.
4.1 Within fifteen (15) days after the adoption of this Ordinance, the City
Clerk shall certify to such adoption and cause copies hereof, so certified, to be posted in at
least three public places within the City.
4.2 Promptly after the adoption of this Oniinance, the City Clerk shall
certify to such adoption and cause a copy hereof, so certified, to be sent to the California
Industrial Development Financing Advisory Commission, together with a list of the members
of the Board of Directors, the Officers, the executive employees of the Authority, and the
name, address and phone number of the Executive Director of the Authority as being the
person to be contacted concerning business of the Authority.
Section $. gffective Date.
5.1 This Ordinance shah be in full force and effect 30 days after its
passagc. The City Clerk shall certify to thc adoption of this Ordinance. The City Clerk
shall publish a summary of this Ordinance and a certified copy of the full text of this
Ordinance shall be posted in the office of the City Clerk at least five days prior to the
adoption of this Ordinanace. Within 15 days from adoption of this Ordinance, the City Clerk
shall publish a summary of this Ordinance, together with thc names of the Councilmembers
voting for and against the Ordinance, and post the same in the office of the City Clerk.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOFrED by the City Council and signed by the Mayor and
attested by the City Clerk this day of March, 1994.
A~T:
Ron Roberts, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
5~ords~smhority 2
STATE OP CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA)
I, June Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that
Ordinance No. 94--- had its first reading on March __, 19_, and had its second' reading on
March _, 1994, and was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula, at a regular meeting of said Council, thereof held on the __ day of March, 1994,
by the following roll call vote:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABS~: COUNCILMEMBERS
June S. Greek, City Clerk
5~ords~amhority 3
RESOLUTION NO. 94-_
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA, ON BEHALF OF THE INDUSTRIAL
DEVF~LO PMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF
TI~IECULA, ACCEFrING THE APPLICATION OF
TENSION ENVELO~ CORPORATION
WHEREAS, the City of Temecula (the "City") is in the process of activating the
Industrial .Development Authority of the City of Temecula (the "Authority") and proposes to
appoint the City Council of the City to act as the Board of Directors of the Authority; and
WHEREAS, Tension Envelope Corporation, a Delaware corporation (hereinafter the
"Company') has submitted its application (hereinafter the *Application*) for the issuance of
bonds to finance a proposed project (hcreinafter the *Project*) as described therein; and
WHEREAS, said Project involves the acquisition of a parcel of land and the existing
building thereon in Temecula, the renovation and rehabilitation thereof and the acquisition
and installation therein of machinery and equipment; and
WHEREAS, the City, on behalf of the Authority, wishes to secure for the people of
the City the public benefits which will accrue as a result of financing the Project; and
.WHEREAS, the Staff of the City, on behalf of the Authority, has reviewed said
Application and has prepared its report with regard thereto;
NOW TI4EREFORE, THE CITY OF TEMECULA, ON BEHALF OF THE
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF TEMF, CULA,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, FIND AND DETERMINE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Application of the Company for financing pursuant to the
California Industrial Development Financing Act, which commences at Section 91500 of the
Government Code of the State of California (hereinafter the *Act*), is hereby accepted.
Section 2. The City, on behalf of the Authority, hereby finds and determines with
respect to said Application as follows:
A. It is likely that the undertaking of the Project will be a substantial
factor in the accrual of the employment benefits for the residents of the City which will
result from the use of the facilities, all as proposed in the Application. These public benefits
will substantially exceed any public detriment from the issuance of bonds in the maximum
5~z~sos~,t~nsion I
principal amount proposed in the Application.
B. The financing of the Project and the resultant operation of the Project
will generate employment benefits for the community by increasing the number of persons
employed within the City. The Company estimates initial employment of approximately 125
employees. Moreover, the Company estimates that its sales will increase over their current
level upon completion of the Project.
C. The use of the facilities to be financed pursuant to the Application
qualifies under Government Code Section 915003 (a) (1) as an industrial use for the
manufacture of envelopes.
D. The Project, as proposed in the Application, is in accord with the
purposes and requirements of the Act in that the Project will enhance and promote economic
development and increase opportunities for useful employment, all as set forth in the
Application.
Section 3. The City, on behalf of the Authority, hereby declares its present
intention to cause 'the Authority to issue tax-exempt bonds on behalf of the Company to
finance the Project in a principal amount in no event to exceed $6,S00,000 and for the
purpose described in the Application.
Section 4. The bonds shall be issued in ~ce with the Act, and shall be
secured by the Project, together with any additional security necessary to insme the
marketability of the bonds issued.
Section 5. In no event shall the bonds constitute a pledge of the faith and credit of
the City, the State of California, or any political subdivision of the State, and the City shall
not be liable to make any appropriations for repayment of the bonds. The bonds shall
constitute a special obligation of the Authority payable solely from the revenues or other
sources provided for in a loan agreement and p~ings to be provided for hereafter.
Section 6. Acceptance of the Application in no way obligates the City or the
Authority to undertake the financing of the Project.
Section 7. It is the purpose and intent of the City, on behalf of the Authority, that
this resolution constitute official action toward the issuance of obligations by the Authority
for the Project in accordance with the regulations and rulings promulgated by the Unites
States Department of the Treasury under Section 103 of the internal Revenue Code of 1986,
as amended.
Section 8. In accordance with Section 91530(0 of the Act, the officers of the
Authority, when activated, are hereby authorized and directed to cause the Application to be
submitted to the City Council of the City for approval of the Project.
5~r~soe\lension 2
Section 9. A copy of the Application shall be filed with the City Clerk of the City.
Concurren~y, a notice of the acceptance of the application and the filing with the City shall
be published in a new~ of general circulation in the City pursuant to Section 91530 (e)
of the Act. Such notice shall name the Company, state the estimated maximum bond issue,
and briefly summarize the Project and refer to the Application for further particulars.
Section 10. In accordance with Section 91531 (a) of the Act, the officers of the
Authority, when activated, are hereby authorized and directed to request that the California
Industrial Development Financing Advisory Commission (bereinaf~ the "Commission")
make the determinations authorized by Section 91531 of the Act. In furtherance of the ·
request, the officers of the Authority, when activated, are hereby authorized and directed to
cause the Application, the fee of the Commission (but solely from funds supplied by the
Company) and other information required by the Commission for its purposes to be
forwarded to the Commission.
Section 11. In accordance with Section 91533 (1) of the Act, the Company shall be
required to pay atl workers employed in the construction of the manufacturing facility a wage
that is not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for ward of a similar
character in the locality in which the work is performed and not less than the general
prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work.
PASS~r}, APPROVI~J~, AND ADOFrED at a regular meeting of the City Council
of the City of Temecula this _ day of March, 1994.
ATTEST:
Ron Roberts, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
5~e, sos~t~nsion 3
ITEM 16
APPROVAL
CITY OF TEMECULA
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
March 8, 1994
City Council
Ronald E. Bradley, City Manager Z~'
Allocation of Funds for Continued Concept Study of Old Town Entertainment
Center
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council approve an amendment to the Memorandum of Understanding between
the City of Temecula, the Redevelopment Agency and T.Z.B.G., Inc. (Zev Buffman) and
allocating ~ 125,000 from the Redevelopment Agency for use in researching the feasibility of
a private/public partnership.
BACKGROUND:
On October 12, 1993, the City, Redevelopmerit Agency and Mr. Buffman entered into a
Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) to negotiate a public/private partnership for the
development of specific entertainment venues in the Old Town Temecula area.
Pursuant to the MOU, Mr. Buffman and City staff have engaged in discussions about the
establishment of a project in the Old Town. At the February 28, 1994, joint City
Council/Planning Commission meeting, Mr. Buffman made a presentation to provide an update
on the progress made during the first six months of the MOU. Mr. Buffman proposed that the
City and he enter into an agreement to share the cost for further research and feasibility
studies on the project.
An amendmentto the MOU would provide the language necessary to describe the cost-sharing
agreement for the research and feasibility studies.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Mr. Buffman has proposed that the costs for further research and feasibility studies be split
equally between the Agency and himself. It is further proposed that the combined cost of the
studies would not exceed $250,000. The Agency's share of that amount is not to exceed
$125,000.
Because the project, if constructed, will ultimately result in public facility and infrastructure
improvements in a redevelopment area it is recommended that $125,000 be appropriated from
the Redevelopment Agency's fund balance.
Attachments:
(1) Amendment to MOU (to be provided at the Council meeting).
ITEM
17
TEMECULA COMMUNITY
SERVICES DISTRICT'
ITEM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAl
CITY ATTORNEY ~_
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
Community Services Board of Directors
Ronald E. Bradley· General Manager
March 8, 1994
Award of Construction Contract for Sports Park Slope Repairs
Project No. pw93-O6CSD
PREPARED BY:
hawnD Nelson Diirector of Commumty Services
on Spa;nolo Pr;nc pal Engineer Cap:tal Projects
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Board of Directors:
Award a contract forthe Sports Park Slope Repairs, Project PW93-06CSD, to American
Contracting, Inc. for $223,445.00, and authorize the President to execute the contract
and;
Authorize the General Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the
contingency amount of $22,344.50, which is equal to 10% of the contract amount.
3. Appropriate $246,000.00to account No. 210-166-648-5804.
e
Authorize a transfer of 8246,000.00 from T.C.S.D. fund balance to the Capital
Projects-Disaster Relief fund.
BACKGROUND:
During the storms of January 1993, the Sports Park suffered damage to the slope below
Margarita Road and to the trapezoidal earthen channel meandering through the park. On
January 11,1994 the Board of Directors approved the plans and specifications for the Sports
Park Slope Repairs, Project No. PW93-06CSD, and authorized the Department of Public
Works to solicit public bids for construction.
The bids were publicly opened on February 24, 1994. The project includes the excavation and
reconstruction of the damaged portion of the slope below Margarita Road, the irrigation and
landscaping of the reconstructed slope, and the excavation and reconstruction of portions of
the earthen trapezoidal channel. The engineer's estimate for this project is $308,109.
-1- pw13~agdept~i4103OB~pwS3-O6.ewd 0228
Sixteen bids were received for the project and the results are as follows:
1. American Contracting, Inc ..................... 'e223,445.00.
4.
5.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
C.E. Wilson Corporation ...................... e227,865.05.
Kemmis Equipment, Inc ....................... ~289,912.85.
Larson Construction ......................... ~290,326.30..
Dave Otteson Co ............................ 8297,370.00.
L.D. Anderson, Inc .......................... $302,241.00.
Cunninghem-Davis Corp ...................... 8304,255.90.
Civil Works Corp ........................... e314,262.60.
Jim Hubbs Construction ...................... $319,964.00.
Commercial Contractors, Inc ................... $322,125.00.
Gillespie Construction, Inc ..................... ~326,731.00.
Los Angelel Engineering, Inc .................... $332,238.00.
One Tractor Doze It All ....................... $354,612.00.
Kruger McGrew Construction Co ................ $382,839.00.
Soil Engineering Const., inc .................... '$447,655.00.
Ryco Construction, Inc ....................... $589,565.00.
American Contracting, Inc. has performed work similar in scope to the Sports Park Slope
Repairs, PW93-06CSD, for other agencies and builders within Riverside County. Based on
comments we have received from the references listed in the bid documents, the work
completed by American Contracting, Inc. has been acceptable.
The construction schedule is for 45 working days. Work is expected to begin in early April,
1994 and be completed by the end of May, 1994.
A copy of the bid summary is available for review in the City Engineer's office.
-2- pw13~egdrpt'~4%O308~ow93-O6.ewd 0228
FISCAL IMPACT:
The project is being funded through Fund Balance in the TCSD - Community Services, Parks,
and Recreation budget. The slope repair and channel improvement portions of the project are
eligible for reimbursement from the Federal Emergency Management Agency(FEMA). The
original reimbursement estimate prepared by FEMA in conjunction with the City is e6,513 for
the slope repair and ~46,132 for the channel improvements. The total project amount is
~245,789.50,which includes the contract amount of ~223,445.00plus the 10% contingency
of $22,344.50.
4- pw13%agdm694~O308%pw93..O6.ewd 0228
CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
CONTRACT
FOR
IViO.,ECT NO. PIN93.06
THIS CONTRACT, made and entered into the 8ffi day of March. 1994, by and between the
City of Temecula, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CITY", and A...alc-q
Contracting, Inc., hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR."
WITNESSETH:
That CITY and CONTRACTOR, for the consideration hereinafter named, mutually agree as
follows:
1,8.
CONTRACT DOCUMFNTS. The complete Contract includes all of the Contract Documents,
to wit: Notice Inviting Bids, Instructions to Bidders, Proposal, Performance Bond, Labor and
Materials Bond, Plans and Specifications entitled PROJECTNO. PW93-06, Insurance Forms,
this Contract, and all modifications and amendments thereto, the State of California
Department of Transportation Standard Specifications (1992 Ed.) where specifically
referenced in the Plans and Technical Specifications,. and the latest version of the Standard~
Soecifications for Public Works Construction. including all supplements as written an,
promulgated by the Joint Cooperative Committee of the Southern California Chapter of the
American Associated General Contractors of California (hereinafter, "Standard
Specifications") as amended by the General Specifications, Special Provisions, and
Technical Specifications for PROJECT NO. PW93-06. Copies of these Standard
Specifications are available from the publisher:
Building News, Incorporated
3055 Overland Avenue
Los Angeles, Califomia 90034
(213) 202-7775
The Standard Specifications will control the general provisions, construction materials, and
construction methods for this Contract except as amended by the General Specifications,
Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications for Project No. PW93-06.
In case of conflict between the Standard Specifications and the other Contract Documents,
the other Contract Documents shall take precedence over and be used in lieu of such
conflicting portions.
Where the Contract Document describes portions of the work in general terms, but not in
complete detail, it is understood that the item is to be furnished and installed completed and
in place and that only the best general practice is to be used. Unless otherwise specified,
the CONTRACTOR shall furnish all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and incidentals, and
do all the work involved in executing the Contract.
CONTRACT CA-1 pwOS~jp~prejeete~pwS3-O6~dpkg.
The Contract Documents am complementary, and whet is called for by anyone shall be as
binding as if called for by ell, Any conflict between this Contract and any other Contract
Document shell be resolved in favor of this Contract,
.~nOPF OF WnRK, CONTRACTOR shall perform everything required to be performed, shaft.
provide and furnish all the labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable equipment, and all *.
utility and transportation services required for the following:
All of said work to be performed and materials to be furnished shall be in strict accordance
with the Drawings and Specifications and the provisions of the Contract Documents
hereinabove enumerated and adopted by CITY.
CITY ApPRnVA~. All labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services shall be furnished and
work performed and completed under the direction and supervision and subject to the
approval of CITY or its authorized representatives.
CONTRACT AMOUNT ANn RCH;nUI F. CITY agrees to pay and CONTRACTOR agrees to
accept in full payment for the work above-agreed to be done, the sum of: TWO HUNDRED
TWENTY THREE THOUSAND FOUR HUNDRED FOURTY FIVE DOLLARS and NO CENTS
($223,445.00),the total amount of the base bid.
CONTRACTOR agrees to complete the work in a period not to exceed forty-rave (45)
working days, commencing with delivery of Notice to Proceed by CITY, Construction shall
not commence until bonds and insurance are approved by CITY,
CHANGE ORnFRS. All change orders shall be approved by the City Council, except that
the City Manager is hereby authorized by the City Council to make, by written order,
changes or additions to the work in an amount not to exceed the contingency as
established by the City Council.
PAYMENTS. On or about the thirtieth (30th)-day of the month next following the
commencement of the work, there shall be paid to the CONTRACTOR a sum equal to ninety
percent (90%) of the value of the work completed since the commencement of the work.
Thereafter, on or. about the thirtieth (30th) day of each successive month as the work
progresses, the CONTRACTOR shall be paid such sum as will bring the peymente each
month up to ninety percent (90%) of the previous payments, provided that the
CONTRACTOR submits his request for payment prior to the last day of each preceding
month. The final payment, if unencumbered, or any pert thereof unsncumbered, shell be
made sixty (60) days after CITY acceptance of the work and the CONTRACTOR filing a
one-year warranty with the CITY on a warranty form provided by the CITY. Payments shell
be made on demands drawn in the manner required by law, accompanied by a certificate
signed by the City Manager, stating that the work for which payment is demanded has been
performed in accordance with the terms of the Contract, and that the amount etated in the
certificate is due under the terms of the Contract. Partial payments ~on the Contract price
shall not be considered as an acceptance of any part of the work.
CONTRACT CA-2 p~erojem%pwgl-06tiikg.
WARRANTY RFTFNTInN. Commencing with the date the Notice of Completion is recorded ~
the CITY shell retain e portion of the Contract award price, to euure warranty performance
and correction of construction deficiencies according to the following schedule:
CONTRACT AMOUNT
825,000- 875,000
875,000- 8500,000
Over 8500,000
RFTFNTION PFRIOn
180 days
180 days
One Year
RFTENTInN PFRCI:NTAGt=
3%.
82,250 + 2% of amount in
excess of 875,000
810,750 + 1% of amount
in excess of 8500,000
10.
LInUIDATFD DAMARES: FXTFNSION OF TIMF. In accordance with Government Code
Section 53069.85, CONTRACTOR agrees to forfeit and pay to CITY the sum of One
Thousand Dollars (81,000.00) per day for each calendar day completion is delayed beyond
the time allowed pursuant to Paragraph 4 of this Contract. Such sum shell be deducted
from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. Such sum shall be
deducted from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR
will be granted an extension of time and will not be assessed liquidated damages for
unforeseeable delays beyond the control of and without the fault or negligence of the
CONTRACTOR including delays caused by CITY. CONTRACTOR is required to promptly
notify CITY of any such delay. -~
WAIVER OF CLAIMS. Unless a shorter time is specified elsewhere in this Contract, on or
before making final request for payment under Paragraph 6 above, CONTRACTOR shell
submit to CITY, in writing, all claims for compensation under or arising out of this Contract;
the acceptance by CONTRACTOR of the final payment shall constitute a waiver of all claims
against CITY under or arising out of this Contract except those previously made in writing
and request for payment. CONTRACTOR shall be required to execute an affidavit, release
and indemnify agreement with each claim for payment.
PREVAILING WAGES. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the
State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per diem
wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each craft,
classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Contract, from the Director of the
Department of Industrial Relations. These rates are on file.with the City Clerk. Copies may
be obtained at cost at the City Clerk's office of Temecula. CONTRACTOR shall post a copy
of such wage rates at the job site and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage rates as a
minimum. CONTRACTOR shall comply with the provisions of Sections 1773.8, 1775,
1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code.
Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, CONTRACTOR shell forfeit to the
CITY, as a penalty, the sum of 825.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each
laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any
work done under this Contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of
the provisions of the Contract.
CONTRACT CA4 pwOb'~dp~preieotelpwe3-O6~ldpkg.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
TIMF OF THF FSRFN~F. Time is of the essence in this Contract.
INDFMNIFICATION. All work covered by this Contract done at the site of construction or
in preparing or delivering materials to the site shall be at the risk of CONTRACTOR alone.
CONTRACTOR agrees to save, indemnify, hold harmless and defend CITY, its officers,
employees, and agents, against any and all liability, injuries, or death of parsons
(CONTRACTOR'semployees included) and damage to property, arising directly or indirectly
out of the obligations harein undertaken or out of the operations conducted by
CONTRACTOR, save and except claims or litigations arising through the sole active
negligence or sole willful misconduct of the CITY.
CRATUITIFS. CONTRACTOR warrants that neither it nor any of its employees, agents, or
representatives has .offered or given any gratuities or promises to CITY's employees,
agents, or representatives with a view toward securing this Contract or securing favorable
treatment with respect thereto.
CONFLICT OF INTFR;ST. CONTRACTOR warrants that he has no blood or marriage
relationship, and that ha is not in any way associated with any City officer or employee, or
any architect, engineer, or other puerparel of the Drawings and Specifications for this
project. CONTRACTOR further warrants that no person in his/her employ has been
employed by the CITY within one year of the date of the Notice Inviting Bids.
CONTRAnTOR'S AFFIDAVIT. After the completion of the work contemplated by this
Contract, CONTRACTOR shell file with the City Manager his affidavit stating that all
workmen and persons employed, all firms supplying materials, and all subcontractors upon
the Project have been paid in full, and that there are no claims outstanding against the
Project for either labor or materials, except certain items, if any, to be set forth in an
affidavit covering disputed claims or items in connection with a Stop Notice which has been
filed under the provisions of the laws of the State of California.
RESOLUTION OF CI-~,IMS. Any dispute or claim arising out of this Contract shell be
arbitrated pursuant to Section 10240 of the California Public Contracts COde.
NOTICE TO CITY OF I AROR DISPUTES. Whenever CONTRACTOR has knowledge that any
actual or potential labor dispute is delaying or threatens to delay the timely performance of
the Contract, CONTRACTOR shall immediately give notice thereof, including all relevant
information with respect thereto, to CITY.
BOOKS AND RECORpS. CONTRACTOR's books, records, and plans or such part thereof
as may be engaged in the performance of this Contract, shall at all reasonable times be
subject to inspection and audit by any authorized representative of the CITY.
INSPFCTION. The work shall be subject to inspection and testing by CITY and its
authorized representatives during manufacture and construction and ell other times and
places, including without limitation, the plans of CONTRACTOR and any of its suppliers.
CONTRACTOR shall provide all reasonable facilities and assistance for the safety and
convenience of inspectors. All inspections and tests shall be performed in such manner as
to not unduly delay the work. The work shell be subject to final inspection and acceptance
notwithstanding any payments or other prior inspections. Such final inspection shall be
made within a reasonable time after completion of the work.
CONTRACT CA-4 pwOSX~p~g~%pwe3-OSXbapke.
20.
DISCRIMINATION. CONTRACTOR represents that it has not, and agree~ that it will no' "~
discriminate in its employment practices on the basis of race, creed, religion, national origin,
color, sex, age, or handicap.
21.
ROVFRNINn I AW. This Contract and any dispute arising hereunder shall be governed by.
the law of the State of California.
22.
WRITTEN NOTICE. Any written notice required to be given in any part of the Contract
Documents shall be performed by depositing the same in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid,
directed to the address of the CONTRACTOR as set forth in the Contract Documents, and
to the CITY addressed as follows:
Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Tamecula, CA 92590-3606
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Contract to be executed on the date
first above written.
DATED:
CONTRACTOR
By:
Print or type NAME
Print or type TITLE
DATED:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Ron Robarts, Mayor
Scott F. Field, City Attorney
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
CONTRACT CA-S pwO~dp~pr~itet.',pws3-O~.
ITEM
NO.
2
REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY
ITEM
1
APPROVAL
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
March 8, 1994
Agency Chairman and Board
Ronald E. Bradley, Executive Director
Approval of Funding MechaniSm for Special Studies- Old Town Temecula
Project
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Agency Board approve:
(1) An amendment to the Memorandum of Understanding between the City of
Temecula, the Redevelopment Agency and T.Z.B.G., Inc. (Zev Buffman); and
(2) An appropriation of ~125,000 from the Redevelopment Agency fund balance to
Account # 280-199-999-5248for use in researching the feasibility of a private/public
partnership.
BACKGROUND:
On October 12, 1993, the City, Redevelopment Agency and Mr. Buffman entered into a
Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) to negotiate a public/private partnership for the
development of specific entertainment venues in the Old Town Temecula area.
Pursuant to the MOU, Mr. Buffman and City staff have engaged in discussions about the
establishment of a project in the Old Town. At the February 28, 1994, joint City
Council/Planning Commission meeting, Mr. Buffman made a presentation to provide an update
on the progress made during the first six months of the MOU. Mr. Buffman proposed that the
City/Agency and he enter into an agreement to share the cost for further research and
feasibility studies on the project.
An amendment to the MOU would provide the language necessary to describe the cost-sharing
agreement for the research and feasibility studies.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Mr. Buffman has proposed that the costs for further research and feasibility studies be split
equally between the Agency and himself. It is further proposed that the combined cost of the
studies would not exceed $250,000. The Agency's share of that amount is not to exceed
$125,000.
Because the project, if constructed, will ultimately result in public facility and infrastructure
improvements in a redevelopment area it is recommended that $125,000be appropriated from
the Redevelopment Agency's fund balance.
Attachments:
(1) Amendment to MOU (to be provided at the Council meeting).