HomeMy WebLinkAbout022294 CC AgendaAGENDA
TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
A REGULAR MEETING
TEMECULA COMMUNITY CENTER - 28816 Pujol Street
FEBRUARY 22, 1994 - 7:00 PM
At approximately 9:45 PM, the City Council will
determine which of the remaining agenda items
can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00
PM and may continue all other items on which
additional time is required until a future meeting.
All meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 PM
EXECUTIVE SESSION: 6:00 PM - pursuant to Government Code Sections:
1. § 54956.8 Real E~tate Negotiation CenferanGe with Real Property Negotiator:
Property. Parking Lot to Old Town Temecula Senior Center located st 41945 6th
Street. Negotiating Parties - Kemper Real Emte Development Corporation and City of
Temecula. under negotiation - Pdce and Terms of Payment and
2. §54956.9(b)1 Conference with Legal Counsel - Anticipated Litigation - Significant
Exposure to Litigation - New Community Lutheran Church
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. 94-06
Resolution: No. 94-15
CALL TO ORDER:
Mayor Ron Roberts presiding
Invocation
Pastor Tim Buttrey, Temecula Valley Christian Center
Flag Salute
Councilmember Birdsall
ROLL CALL:
Birdsell, Mufioz, Parks, Stone, Robarts
PRESENTATIONS/
PRESENTATIONS
Proclamation - Scholarship Awareness Week
Presentation by Small Business Development Center,
Corazzini
Presentation on "Aging" - Jane Farmer
Proclamation - American Cancer Society Daffodil Days
Teri
Agend~0222e4 I 02/17/14
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Council
on items that are not listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are
limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council about an item
n~t listed on the Agenda or on the consent Calendar, a pink "Requeat To Speak" form
should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address.
For all other agenda items a "Request To Speak' form must be filed with the City Clerk
before the Council gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual
speakers.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be
made at this time. A total, not to exceed, ten (10) minutes will be devoted to these
reports.
CONSENT CALENDAR
2
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be
enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless
members of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent
Calendar for separate action.
Standard Ordinance Adoorion Procedure
RECOMMENDATION
1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions
included in the agenda.
Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve the minutes of February 1, 1994;
Aoendd022294 2 02/17/14
7
8
9
10
Authorization to Renew Prooertv Insurance Policy
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1 Approve the renewal of the City's property insurance coverage with
Aetna Insurance Company in an amount not to exceed ~30,000, annual
premium.
French Valley Airoort Master Plan Uodate
RECOMMENDATION:
8,1 Receive and file report.
Acceotance of an Offer of Dedication - Portions of Camoanula Way and Acceotance
Into the City-Maintained Storm Drain Svstem- Storm Drain Facilities within Portions
of Camoanula Way
RECOMMENDATION:
9.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 94-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA,
CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE OFFER OF DEDICATION OF, PORTIONS OF
CAMPANULA WAY AND ACCEPTING STORM DRAIN FACILITIES WITHIN
PORTIONS OF CAMPANULA WAY INTO THE CITY-MAINTAINED STORM
DRAIN SYSTEM
BookinQ Fees
RECOMMENDATION:
10.1 Authorize the Mayor to execute the appropriate documents to resolve
the booking fees question pursuant to SB 2557.
AeendN022294 4 02/1
3
Resolution Aoorovino list of Demands
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1
Adopt · resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 94-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
4
~ 5
6
"No ParkinQ" Zone on Avenida Barca from Humber Drive to Via Monterey
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 94--
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ESTABLISHING "NO PARKING' ZONE ON AVENIDA BARCA FROM HUMBER
DRIVE TO RANCHO VIA MONTEREY
All-way Stoo. Rancho Vista Road at Meadows Parkway
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 94-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
ESTABLISHING 'STOP SIGNS"
Review and Aooroval of Fiscal Year 1993-94 Mid-Year Budaet
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1
OF TEMECULA
Adopt · resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 94-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
AMENDING THE RSCAL YEAR 1993-94 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET
~ -'aende~222~4 a 02,q 7/e4
SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES
11
Second Reading of Ordinance 94-05. Adootino Portions of the Old Town Soecific Plan
RECOMMENDATION:
11.1 Adopt an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 94-05
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ADOPTING PORTIONS OF THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN, AMENDING THE
OFFICIAL ZONING MAP FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA, AND AMENDING CITY
ORDINANCES 90-04, 92-16, AND 93-12
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before a public hearing
or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the
project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may
be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing
or in written correspondences delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public
hearing.
12
Amendment to Section No. 18.~8 A.C.(10) of Ordinance No. 348 Pertaining to the
Tvoe of Paving Material Reouired for access to Second Dwelling Units
RECOMMENDATION:
12.1
Read by title only and introduce an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 94,-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA,
AMENDING SECTION NO. 18.28.A.C.(10) OF ORDINANCE NO. 348
PERTAINING TO THE TYPE OF PAVING MATERIAL REQUIRED FOR
ACCESS TO SECOND DWELLING UNITS
'a43endNO22294 S 02/11/14
13
14
Planning Aoolication No. 93-0179. Amendment No. 1. Second Unit Permit - Aooeal of
Conditions of ADoroval No. 31 and 42 (reouirement for the all-weather access to the
second unit)
(Continued from the meeting of 01/11/94)
RECOMMENDATION:
13.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 94-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
REGARDING THE APPEAL BY RAYMOND AND ODETTE DETOBERT AND
MICHELLE HAPlOT AND APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 93-0179,
AMENDMENT NO. 1
Ordinance Amendino Land use Code reoardino Plot Plans. Conditional Use Permits and
Public Use Permits
(Continued from the meeting of 01/25/94)
RECOMMENDATION:
14.1 Read by title only and introduce an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO.' 94-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
AMENDING THE LAND USE CODE REGARDING THE TERM OF PLOT PLANS,
CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS, AND PUBLIC USE PERMITS
14.2
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 94-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE LAND USE
CODE REGARDING THE TERM OF PLOT PLANS, CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS,
AND PUBLIC USE PERMITS
Agenda/022294 8 02/17/14
15 Establishment of a Vehicle Imoound Cost Recovery Fee
16
(Continued from the meeting of 1/25/94)
RECOMMENDATION:
15.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 94-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ESTABLISHING A VEHICLE IMPOUND COST RECOVERY FEE
Amendment to Ordinance 348 to Add a New Section Providing ReQulations to Allow
for a Reduction in Sauare Footaoe to ADDrOved Residential Subdivisions
RECOMM=_NDATION:
16.1
Direct staff to prepare an Urgency Ordinance amending Ordinance 348
by adding a new section providing regulations to allow for a reduction
of square footage and changes to elevations to approved residential
subdivisions.
COUNCIL BUSIN
17 Consideration of Recommendation Regardino County Ambulance Services
RECOMM --'NDATION:
17.1 Support the County of Riverside pursuing ambulance services through
the competitive bid process.
18
AeeedefO22214
Soecific P an No. 164. Amendment No. 2 (PA93-0145) Rorioaucih
(Continued from 02-08-94)
RECOMMENDATION:
18.1
Re-introduce an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 94-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
AD 3PTING LAND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR SPECIFIC PLAN NO. I re4,
LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF NICOLAS ROAD AND NORTH
GE ~IERAL KEARNY ROAD
02~17/94
18.2
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 94-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ADOPTING SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 164, AMENDMENT NO. 2, (PLANNING
APPLICATION 930145), LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF
NICOLAS ROAD AND NORTH GENERAL KEARNY ROAD SO AS TO CHANGE
"THE ZONING" FOR PLANNING AREA 7 FROM VERY HIGH RESIDENTIAL (20
DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), TO HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (12 DWELLING
UNITS PER ACRE), TO ADD A THREE (3) ACRE PARK TO PLANNING AREA 7,
TO ADJUST THE BOUNDARIES BETWEEN PLANNING AREAS 7, 8 AND 9,
AND REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 93-07
18.3
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 94-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 27827 (PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. 93-0144) LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF NICOLAS ROAD
AND NORTH GENERAL KEARNY ROAD SO AS TO CREATE A 162 SINGLE
FAMILY LOT SUBDIVISION PLUS A THREE (3) ACRE LOT FOR A PUBLIC PARK
WITHIN SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 167, PLANNING AREA NO. 7 AND REPEALING
RESOLUTION NO. 94-08
19
2O
General Plan Consistency Handbook
RECOMMENDATION:
19.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 94-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVING THE GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY HANDBOOK
Performina Arts/Community Theater
RECOMMENDATION:
20.1 Consider the City's participation with the Temecula 'Valley Unified
School District in the construction and expansion of the Chapparal High
School Theater for use as a community performing arts theater.
Agendi/022294 I 02/17/94
DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS
CITY MANAGER REPORT
CITY ATTORNEY REPORT
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: March 8, 1994, 7:00 PM, Temecula Community Center, 28816
Pujol Street, Temecula, California
Agends/0222e4 9 O2/17/14
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SFRVICES nlSTRICT MFFTIN~ - (To be held at 8:00)
Next in Order:
CALL TO ORDER:
ROLL CALL:
PUBLIC COMMENT:
Resolution: No. 94-01
President Jeff Stone
DIRECTORS:
Birdsall, Mu~oz, Parks, Roberts, Stone
Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors, should
present a completed pink "Request to Speak" to the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state
your name and address for the record.
CONSENT CALENDAR
I Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of the meeting of February 8, 1994.
Review and Aooroval of the Fiscal Year 1993-94 Mid-Year Budoet
2
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 94-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 1993-94
ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGETS
Acceptance of Grant Deed for Remainder of Sam Hicks Monument Park
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Accept a grant deed from the Sam Hicks Monument Park Foundation for the
remaining parcel within Sam Hicks Monument Park.
AgenclN022284 10 02/17ill,
4
Contract Chanae Orders No. 1 ~ through No. 13 -Communitv Recreation Center -
Phase II. Project No. PW92-29B
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1
Approve Contract Change Orders No. 12 end No. 13 for the Community
Recreation Center - Phase II, Project No. PW92-29B, for labor, material,
and equipment in the amount of $20,356.68.
Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement for · Proiect Coordinator for the
Community Recreation Center. Project No. PW92-029B
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1
Approve Amendment No. 3, extending the Professional Services
Agreement for a Project Coordinator for the Community recreation
Center, Project No. PW92-29B, for an additional 36 days in an amount
not to exceed $9,760.00;
5.2
Appropriate funds in the amount of $9,760.00 from TCSD bond
proceeds to account number 250-190-129-5804.
DEPARTMENTAL REPORT
GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT - Dixon
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT - Nelson
BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS.
ADJOURNMENT: Next regular meeting March 8, 1992, 8:00 PM, Temecula Community
Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California
'e'eende/O22294 I 1 02/17N
TEMECULA REDEVELOPM;NT AGENCY MEETINn
Next in Order:
Resolution: No. 94-02
CALL TO ORDER:
ROLL CALL:
Chairperson Ronald J. Parks presiding
AGENCY MEMBERS: Birdsall, Roberts,
Parks
Stone, Mufioz,
PUBLIC COMMENT:
Anyone wishing to address the Agency, should present a
completed pink "Request to Speak" to the City Clerk. When you
are called to speak, please come forward and state your name
and address for the record.
AGENCY BUSINESS
2
Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of February 8, 1994.
Review and Aooroval of the Fiscal Year 1993-94 Mid-Year Budaet
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 94-
A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 1993-94 BUDGETS FOR THE
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FUNDS
Aeencle/022294 12 02/17/~4
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
AGENCY MEMBER'S REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT: Next regular meeting March 8, 1994, 8:00 PM, Temecula Community
Center, 28816, Temecula, California
AOend~O22294 13 02/17,14
PR S NTATIONS\
PROCLAMATIONS
The City of Temecula
PROCLAMATION
WHEREAS, the Temecuh Valley High School Scholarship Foundation is a nonprofit
organization chartered in 1987 with the Citizens Scholarship Foundation of America, Inc. for
the purpose of providing financial aid to Temecula Valley High School students aspiring to
higher education without regard to race, creed, color, sex oi: national origin, and
WHEREAS, in 1993 $68,000.00 in scholarships were awarded to deserving seniors as
a result of donations from individuals, firms, corporations and organizations from throughout
the Temccula/Murrieta area; and
WHEREAS, again this year the cost of tuition, books and housing is skyrocketing and
the current economic climate remains depressed; and
WHEREAS, some high school graduates are finding that the doors to a college education
may be closed to them without public awareness of the need and donations to assist these
scholars;
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Ronald H. Roberts, on behalf of the City Council of the City
of Temecula, hereby proclaim the week of February 20, 1994 to be
"Scholarship Awareness Week"
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City
of Temeeuh to be affixed this 22nd day of February, 1994.
Ron Robert,s, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
The City of Temecula
PROCLAMATION
WHEREAS, the daffodil is the first flower of spring and with spring comes the eternal
hope of a world free of cancer, and;
WHEREAS, the American Cancer Society has chosen the daffodil to symbolize this
hope, and;
WHEREAS, this year the Temocula Noon Rotary, working in concert with the American
Cancer Society will welcome spring during the annual Daffodil Days celebration, a fundraising
event designed to reach a goal of $80,000 in the Inland Empire, and;
WHEREAS, corporate, business and individual participation is essential to fund the
continuing research, education and rehabilitation programs in our community,
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Ronald H. Roberrs, on behalf of the City Council of the City
of Temecula, hereby proclaim the month of March to be,
"DAFFODIL DAYS MONTH"
in the City of Temecula and I call upon businesses and citizens to join in this program by
purchasing daffodils from the American Cancer Society to spread the hope and happiness of
spring to loved ones, friends, family and business associates or to send to cancer patients at local
health care facilities.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City
of Temecula to be affixed this 22nd .day of February, 1994.
Ron Roberts, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
ITEM
1
ITEM
NO.
2
MINUTES OF A SPECIAL MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
HELD FEBRUARY 1, 1994
A regular meeting of the Temecula City Council was called to order at 7:04 PM at the
Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Tamecula, California. Mayor Ron Robarts
presiding.
PRESENT 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Mui~oz, Parks,
Stone, Robarts
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Also present were City Manager David F. Dixon, City Attorney Scott F. Field, and City Clerk
June S. Greek.
INVOCATION
The invocation was given by Pastor Rick Izman, Temecula Valley Community Church
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The audience was led in the flag salute by Councilmember Parks.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None given.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Councilmember Mur~oz stated he met with Timothy Vonalt, from Goodhew Ambulance
Services, and requested that the matter of contract proposals for county emergency services
be placed on a future agenda for recommendations.
Mayor Pro Tem Stone also stated he met with the same gentlemen and would like to seek
bids from other companies for these services. City Manager Dixon stated this could be placed
on the agenda of February 22, 1994.
COUNCIL BUSINESS
1. Economic Devalooment WorkshoD
City Manager Dixon presented a report on Economic Development, using a set of
overheads to outline various types of funding sources which a City uses to provide
Minutes%2%01 ~94 -1 - 02/08/94
CiW Council Minute FebNew 1.1994
needed services. He also showed percentages to illustrate these services are broken-
down.
Kenneth Dodd, 30097 Via Velez Race, presented an overview of the City's
Promotional Program on a national scale. He explained that this has been an
awareness campaign, directed at making the name "Temecula" known throughout the
country. He reported that incentives are very important in attracting businesses to the
community and read · list of the top 10 incentives.
Councilmember Mufioz asked if most incentives are State funded. Mr. Dodd answered
they are a combined effort of state, county and cities.
Mr. Dodd stated the City must be in a position to have a prepared document as to
what it can offer to companies, and explained how important attitudes and perceptions
are in attracting new companies to an area.
Councilmember Parks stated he feels it is important to work with the State and County
in putting together a program to attract business. He reported that the City is also
competing with other countries.
City Manager Dixon reported the City is in negotiations now, competing with the
United Kingdom and Germany,
Mr. Dodd stated he feels a more "unified front" is needed from the Council to attract
business, and the Council needs to be closely aligned with the Economic Development
Council and the Chamber of Commerce.
Councilmember Mu~oz stated that the main emphasis of the promotion program was
to bring employers to the City, not tax dollars. He objected to the campaign being
described as an "awareness" campaign, and felt it is a promotional program.
City Manager Dixon said he feels the program the Council asked Mr. Dodd to do was
an awareness program, not one seeking sales tax revenues or to generate retailers.
He explained that one of the things that can be noted is more than ~1.3 million a year
are generated through tax increment within the RDA and a substantial amount is from
industrial facilities.
Dennis Chiniaeff, 29321 Via Norte, stated that prior to incorporation, the area
developers spent corporate millions to bring new jobs to the community, He explained
that this was accomplished because necessary infra-structure was built, He said he
believes incentives are: one, monetary which should be looked at as an investment
decision and which must bring a return to the City; two, the attitude that the City
offers to the business world; three, a fast track program to assist companies through
the development process. He stated that when people read of dissention and conflict,
it does not reflect a business friendly atmosphere. He stated that every City employee
should consider themselves an "ambassador" for City Hall.
Minutee%2%O 1%94 -2- 02/08/94
City tourrail Minutes Febmaw 1. 1994
Derek Thomas, 31820 Via Levantar, Chief Financial Officer of the EDC agreed with the
comments of Mr. Chiniaeff that a unified plan must be adopted. He explained it is
difficult for the EDC to know what to expect from the City, He asked the City support
the EDC in their efforts to hire a full-time Director.
Jeff Minkler, Area Manager for Kemper, 35790 Linda Rosea Road, stated he feels it
is important that the City Council adopt a policy on incentives so that no confusion will
exist.
Mayor Roberts asked how he would feel about the private sentor participating in
offering incentives to companies wishing to locate in the City. Mr. Minkler stated the
easiest way for the private sector to do this would be to offer lower prices on land.
Mayor Pro Tem Stone stated he feels the City Council is perceived incorrectly and not
all members are against incentives. He stated he is in favor of developing a matrix
outlining various incentives that might be offered depending upon the situation.
Councilmember Birdsall stated she feels that City needs to oparete like a corporate
structure and incentives should be viewed as an investment in the community.
Carliene Anderson, 41593 Winchester Road, Ste 105, distributed packets to the
Council, including the mission statement of the EDC. She suggested the City meet
with County and State representatives to put together a plan to attract businesses, and
keep them from going out of state. She said that a combined effort is needed when
competition is a way of life. She stated that incentives are a very important part of
this process, and incentives need not always be financial.
Councilmember Muftoz stated he agrees with the City participating in a combined
effort with the State and County. He says he favors incentives that are not financial.
Councilmember Parks asked if, based on working with the City over the last year, a
point person is needed. Ms. Anderson stated that Mr. Dixon has been an excellent
representative,-but since he will soon be taking another position, a representative to
work with the EDC should be appointed.
Mayor Pro Tem Stone asked Ma. Anderson how the EDC can insure jobs will not go
to Murrieta. Ms. Anderson stated that jobs in the area will benefit both communities,
whether they locate in Temecula or Murrieta.
Councilmember Parks stated he feels economic development is important for the entire
valley and jobs in the area should be the main emphasis, not whether they locate in
Temecula or Murrieta.
Councilmember Mui~oz asked if the County has been approached to join the EDC. Ms.
Anderson stated they are ~5001year members.
MinuTest,2~01 't94 -3- 02/08/94
Ciw Council IVinutee Febmew 1. 1994
Mayor Robarts called a recess at 8:48 PM. The meeting was reconvened at 9:05 PM with
all members present.
Evelyn Harker, 31130-85 So. General Kearny, emphasized the need to increase the
number of jobs in this area to increase the quality of life.
Joan Sparkman, 30554 San Pasqual Road, stated she feels the City needs to change
its attitude toward neighboring cities. She said she feels the City Council needs to
become the "Nordstroms" of the area, treating people with respect and giving them
the level of service they ned and desire.
Vivi Wells, 39460 Oakcliff Drive, stated she agrees with incentives as long as the City
gets its money beck. She asked that a specific point person be appointed to work with
the EDC.
City Manager Dixon said he understands the Council's direction that the City needs to
develop an incentive package that is clearly understandable. He reported the City of
Lancaster has a model that it uses to determine the benefits derived from various
companies. He stated he has run a model that gives guidelines that Temecula may be
able to adopt. He emphasized that each understanding must be separate and distinct.
He stated with respect to retail assistance from sales tax, that opportunity no longer
exists due to passage of the Eisanburg Bill which prevents such assistance.
Councilmember Mufioz stated he feels that the last item on a list of incentives to be
offered should be cash grants. He stated a structured criteria should be developed and
other means such as fast-tracking should be used before considering grants. He said
has represented clients who were trying to get programs through the City's system
and he has had to personally intercede to make things happen.
Councilmember Parks stated he would like to see a commitment for an economic
development program for this year be made with a specific staff representative
assigned to pursue sources of funding. He also recommended a policy on incentives
be developed to identify the City's official position.
Mayor Pro Tam Stone suggested that projects be assigned a Council liaison to help
move projects forward. He supported the need for a matrix listing incentives, based
on return for the community. He stated he feels a scaled-clown program should be
instituted this year with the Assistant City Manager as the point person. He said he
feels a special meeting is need to design the matrix, which needs to receive "buy-in"
by each member of the Council.
Mayor Roberts stated .he feels the EDC needs a paid, experienced General Manager and
staff. He said he still has problems with Temecula paying $10,000.00 as opposed to
Murrieta's $1,000.00. He said he feels a marketing program is still needed for the
IVinutee~2~01%94 -4- 02/08/94
City Courtoil Minute
FebNew 1, 1994
City, but on a smaller scale. He listed those things that have been brought out such
as incentives are acceptable with grants as a last resort and political stability and an
undivided City Council is needed to change the perception of the City as being anti-
business.
Councilmember Parks reported that the EDC has been instrumental in putting together
a workshop with Rancho California Water District, and have set up a long term
program with Eastern Municipal Water District.
Mayor Pro Tam Stone asked that Southern California be the focus of future marketing
instead of National.
City Manager Dixon stated he feels direction has been given to staff to prepare s
synopsis of the points agreed upon during the discussions and to place a policy/matrix
on a future agenda for consideration and/or action by the Council. Council consensus
was given.
Councilmember Mu~oz asked that subsequent meetings be recorded.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Mayor Pro Tam Stone to extend
the meeting until 10:30 PM. The motion carried 4-1 with Councilmember Birdsall in
opposition.
Position of City Maneoar
City Manager Dixon reported that the position of City Manager will be vacated at the
end of February and Council direction needs to be received on how to proceed. He
listed various alternatives as follows: one, fill the position from within and appoint the
Assistant City Manager as interim City Manager; two, fill the position with an interim
City Manager and three, to secure the services of an executive recruitment firm to
professionally conduct a recruitment for the position.
He explained that an interim City Manager could come from a list of retired City
Managers and that the Council should define if the Interim City Manager would
conduct the recruitment for a City Manager or whether a consultant should be hired
to do this recruitment. Mr. Dixon reported that recruitment for a permanent City
Manager should take between 90 to 120 days.
Mr. Dixon stated if Council desires to retain an interim City Manager, he would work
with the Mayor and Mayor Pro Tem to put together a list of 8 or 10 applicants for the
full Council to interview. He said such an appointment could be for a time certain or
until a permanent City Manager is hired.
Minutee~2~01 ~94 -5- 02/08/94
City Coundl Minutes
Februm 1, 1994
Vivi Wells, 39460 Oakcliff Drive, stated she feels the position of City Manager should
be more described than it has been in the past She read a list of suggested
qualifications and presented it to the City Clerk for the record.
Councilmember Parks stated he is in favor of hiring an interim City Manager because
he feels the Assistant City Manager is too busy with current activities. He emphasized
that he would like to hire a City Manager of equal or better calibre than the current
City Manager and would like to use the services of a professional recruitment team.
Councilmember Muf~oz said he is in favor of the Assistant City Manager serving as
Interim City Manager, since he is familiar with the community and would provide
continuity. He said that he feels the City Council should be directly involved in the
hiring of the new City Manager and a consultant should not be used. He stated he
would like to examine the compensation level, and establish guidelines in advance.
Councilmember Birdsall stated she is in favor of hiring an Interim City Manager, and
suggested that the Interim City Manager be used to recruit the permanent City
Manager. She stated that a time limit should be placed on this of three months, and
if after that time, no decision has been made, a consultant should be brought in.
Mayor Pro Tam Stone stated he is also in favor of hiring an Interim City Manager who
is not be a candidate. He said he feels this is an important position and should be
given to someone with extensive experience. He stated he feels the City Council
should be directly involved in the selection of the City Manager.
Mayor Robarts stated that he is in favor of hiring an Interim City Manager.
City Manager Dixon said a group of retired City Managers who provide this service are
available through the League of California Cities. He stated he could contact them
tomorrow and ask for a list of 8 or 10 candidates and the Council could collectively
choose candidates they would like to interview.
It was moved by Councilmember Birdsell, seconded by Mayor Pro Tam Stone to
instruct the City Manager to initiate the process to select an interim City Manager from
a group of non-applicant candidates, and to present these to the Council for
consideration within the next 30 days.
The motion carried by the following vote:
AYES:
4 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Parks, Stone, Roberts
NOES: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Mufioz
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Minute8%2~01%94 -~ 02/08/94
Ciw Coun;il Minute Febmew 1, 1994
It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Stone to direct
that criteria, provided by the City Council, be developed for selecting a City Manager.
This criteria is to be used by the interim City Manager to conduct a
recruitment/selection process which involves the members of the City Council.
Further, it was directed that the process be reviewed in 90 days to determine if it is
effective.
The motion carried by the following vote:
AYES:
4 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Mufioz, Stone, Roberts
NOES: I
COUNCILMEMBERS: Parks
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Councilmember Parks stated he feels · professional recruiter is needed to effectively
recruit for a I~osition such as City Manager and feels that three months will be wasted
by not proceeding with a consultant immediately.
City Manager Dixon stressed how important confidentiality is to the process.
CITY MANAGI:R REPORTS
None given.
CITY ATTORNEY REPORTS
None given.
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Councilmember Mufioz, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Stone to adjourn at
10:40 PM to a meeting on February 8, 1994, 7:00 PM, Temecula Community Center, 28816
Pujol Street, Temecula, California. The motion was unanimously carried.
ATTEST:
J. Sal Mufioz, Mayor
"" June S. Greek, City Clerk
Minutes~2\01 t94 -7- 02/08/94
ITEM NO.
3
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TlgvlECULA ~-LLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND
DElVlANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE,
DETERMINE AND ORDER .AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A have been
audited by the City Managcr, and that the same are hereby allowed in the amount of
$1,2~7,484.38.
Section ~. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED~ this 22nd day of February, 1994.
ATTEST:
Ron Robcrts, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[S AL]
STATE OF CAI-n~ORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE)
CITY OF TEMECULA)
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of ~e City of Temecula, hereby do certify ~ ~he
foregoing Resolution No. 94- was duly adopt~ sl a regular meeting of the City Council of the
City of Temecula on the 22nd day of February, 1994 by ~he fonowins ron can vo~e:
AYES: 0
COUNCH34P-MBERS: None
NOES: 0
COUNCIL_-MI~!MBE~: None
COUNt: None
June S. Greek, City Clerk
CITY OF TEMECULA
LIST OF DEMANDS
02/03/94 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
02/10/94 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
02/22/94 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
02/10/94 TOTAL PAYROU~
81~3,132.06
185,041.13
l!e2,947,32
S10e,363.87
TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 02/22/94 COUNCIL MEETING:
DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND:
CHECKS:
191
192'
210
2~
310
330
380
GENERAL
GA8 TAX
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FUND
TCSD
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ (CIP)
TCSD-CIP
RDA-CIP
SELF-INSURANCE
VEHICLES
INFORMATIONS SYSTEM8
COPY CENTER
FACILITIES
RDA-DEBT SERVICE
18,gl 1.80
17,278.36
~,587.58
PAYROLL:
001
190
191
193
300
320
330
340
GENERAL (PAYROLL)
GAS TAX (PAYROLL)
TCSD (PAYROLL)
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A (PAYROLL)
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C (PAYROLL}
SELF-INSURANCE (PAYROLL)
INFORMATION SYSTEMS (PAYROLL)
COPY CENTER (PAYROLL)
FACIUTIES
~88,428.72
S16,636.24
$15,933.85
8433.18
$1,717.65
8548.t0
t1,162.50
TOTAL BY FUND:
PREPARED BY KARMA INTYRE -
I, MARY J'I,~IE ;' FINANCE
FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
: DIXON, CITY MANAGEF
, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING 18 TRUE AND CORRECT.
$1,151,1 20,51
$106,363.87
$1,25'/,484.65
VOUCHRE2
02/0:3/9/,
17:07
CiTY OF TEHECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUll)
100 GAS TAX FUND
120 DEVELOPHENT IllPACT FUND
190 COIIqUN]TY SERVICES DISTRICT
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
280 REDEVELOIq, ENT AGENCY - CIP
300 INSURANCE FUND
310 VEHICLES FIJND
320 IMFORNATIUN SYSTENS
)30 COPY CENTER FUND
FACILITIES
TOTAL
/T
77,867.63
15,861.57
9,300.00
15,035.48
5,786.11
3,8~0.12
219.30
560.35
1,204.13
2,551.26
3,343.~0
37,562./,1
173,132.06
voucr
o2/o~. 17:o7
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VEIIDOR
H~ER DATE ~ER
13541 02/03/9A 000101
135~1 02/03/94 000101
13542 02/03/94 000102
13543 02103194 000105
13543 02/03/94 000105
135~, 02/03/94 000116
135U, 02/03/94 000116
135/,/, 02/03/94 000116
135z~c. 02/03/94 000116
135~4 02/03/94 000116
13546 02/03/94 000116
135~4 02/03/94 000116
135z~ 02/03/96 000116
135~ 02/03/94 000116
13545 02/03/96 000120
13545 02/03/94 000120
137 32/03/94 000120
13546 02/03/94 00012~
13547 02/03/94 000131
13547 02/03/96 000131
13568 02/03/94 000160
13548 02/03/94 000160
13568 02/03/94 000160
13548 02/03/96 000160
13548 02/03/94 000160
13548 02/03/94 000160
13548 02/03/94 000160
13549 02/03/94 0OO146
APPLE ORE
APPLE ORE
AMERICAN FENCE CO, OF C
AEI SECURITY, INC.
AEI SECURITY, INC.
AVP VISIOR PLANS
AVP VISIOR PLANS
AVP VISIOR PLANS
AVP VISIOR PLANS
AVP VISION PLANS
AVP VISION PLANS
AVP VISION PLANS
AVP VISION PLANS
AVP VISION PLANS
BICKNELL TRAVEL CENTER
BICKNELL TRAVEL CENTER
BICKNELL TRAVEL CENTER
CAL VEST RENTAL CENTER
CARL WARREN & CO., INC.
CARL WARREN & CO., INC.
COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN
COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN
COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN
COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN
COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN
COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN
COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN
COUNTS UNLINI'TED
13550 02/03/94 000155 DAVLIN
13550 02/03/94 000155 DAVLIN
13551 02/03/94 000156
13551 02/03/94 000156
13551 02/03/94 000156
13552 02/03/94 000165
13552 02/03/94 000165
13553 02/03/94 000177
000177
135:, J2/0~/94 000177
DENTICARE OF CALIFORNIA
DENT[CARE OF CALIFORNIA
DEMTICARE OF CALIFORNIA
FEDERAL EXPRESS
FEDERAL EXPRESS
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODtJCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
CITY OF TBECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEIq
DESCRIPTION
TEI4P HERVICE/ME 1/15/9~
TEMP SERVICE/ME 1/22/9~
TEMPORARY FENCE RENTAL
ALARM MOIdlTORING; CITY
ALARM MONITCRING SERVIC
INSIJRANCE PREMIUM/FEB.
INStJRANCE PREMIUM/FEB.
INSURANCE PREMIUM/FEB.
INSIJRANCE PREMIUM/FEB.
INSURANCE PREI41UM/FEB.
INSIJItANCE PREleIUM/FEB.
IN$IJRANCE PREMIUM/FEB,
]NStJRANCE PREMIUM/FEB,
INSURANCE PREMIUM/FEB,
COMFERENCE/S.FORDeJ.HEY
CORFERENCE/S.FORI),J.NEY
WORKSHOP/C. RUIZ
TRENCHER RENTAL
LAKE VILLAGE COI~ITY
NAJE~SKI, CRAIG
INSURANCE PREMIUM FEB 9
INSUILANCE PREMIUM FEB 9
INSURANCE PREMIUM FEB 9
INSURANCE PREMIUM FEB 9
INSURANCE PREMIUM FEB 9
INSURANCE PREMIUM FEB 9
INSURANCE PREMIUM FEB 9
TWO DIRECTIONAL LINK CO
VIDEO/AUDIO TAPE
AUDIO TAPING/PUBLIC SAF
INSURANCE PREHIUM/FEBRU
INSURANCE PREMIUM/FEBRU
INSURANCE PRENIUM/FEBRU
PRIORITY TUBE
STANDARD PAKTOBI$
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SU
MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES
ACCOUNT
NUNBER
280-199-999-5250
280-199-999-5250
190-180-999-5238
340-1~-~-5250
190-180-999-5250
001 -Z$10
I00-2310
190-2310
191-2310
19~-2310
~00-Z$10
530-2~10
34,0-2310
001-1180
001-161-999-5272
001-161-999-5258
001-161-999-5261
190-180-~-5238
300-199-99~-5205
300-1~-~;~-5205
001-2330
100-2:~0
190-2530
191-2330
193-2330
530-2,'130
:~0-2.330
100-1(~-9f9-5406
001-100-999-5250
001-1(~-~-5250
001-23~0
100-2,~0
001-150-999-5250
001-161-f~-5230
001-160-~-5230
001-120-~-5220
1~0-180-~-527.0
001-110-~-5220
001-160-~-5220
ITEM
ANOUNT
103.20
116.10
145.00
105.00
105.00
437.14
136.52
97.15
4,14
5.06
3.9~
15.75
15.75
26.95
138.00
103.00
1~4.00
101.82
265.00
129.25
130.75
9.75
132 .CO
11 .~8
16.02
19.50
25.50
800.~
701.67
153.3~
29.86
14.93
15.00
20.2:$
9.00
(:8.15
166.67
15.77
PAGE 1
CHE;K
AMOUNT
219.30
145.00
210.00
740.~0
385.00
101.82
394.25
363.00
800.00
855.01
59.79
29.23
VOUCHRE2 CiTY OF TENECULA
02/03/9~ 17:07 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
Flit ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEH ACCOUNT
NLIiER DATE NtJlIBER MANE DESCRiPTiON NUNBER
iTEN
MI3UIIT
CHE, CK
N4OUNT
13553 02/03/94 000177 GLENHIES OFFICE PROIRJCT HIS(. OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-140-999-5220
26.11
276.19
13556 02/03/96 000184 GTE CALIFORNIA ]NCORPOR 909-699-0128
320-199-999-5208
269.58
269.58
13555 02/03/96 000186 HANKS HARDVARE
MISt. SHALL TOOLS & SUP 3443-199-999-5242
308.36
13556 02/03/96 000201 JENNAOD
PROVIDE CUSTODZAL NAZNT 190-182-999-5212
400.00
400. O0
13557 02/03/96 000209 L & H FERTiLiZER, INC. HISC. PANTS
190-180-999-5242
22,25
22.25
13558 02/03/9~ 000210 LEAGUE OF CALIF.CITIES ANNUAL LEAGUE DUES 001-100-999-5226
5,013.00
5,013.00
13559 02/03/94 000228 14081L 883 930 379 2 DE(BIER 001-162-999-5263
13559 02/03/9~ 000228 NO61L 883 930 379 2 DE(BIER 001-161-999-5262
13559 02/03/9~ 000228 HOBIL 883 930 379 2 DECE!IER 190-180-999-5263
42.5,G
16.06
16.16
72.76
13560 02/03/9~ 000265
13560 02/03/96 000265
13560 02/03/9~ 000265
13560 02/03/96 000245
13560 02/03/96 000245
13560 02/03/94 000245
13560 02/03/94 000245
13560 02/03/94 000265
13560 02/03/96 000245
PERS (HEALTH INSUR.PREN
PERS (HEALTH INSUR.PREM
PERS (HEALTH INSUR.PREH
PERS (HEALTH ]NSUR,PREH
PERS (HEALTH INSUR,PREI4
PERS (HEALTH ]NSUR,PREIq
PERS (HEALTH INSUR,PREN
PERS (HEALTH INSUR,PREN
PERS (HEALTH ]NSUR.PREN
13561 02/03/96 000247 PESTIqASTER
INSURANCE PREN]UN/FEBRU 001-2090
INSURANCE PREN]UH/FEBRU 100-2090
INSIJRANCE PREHIUN/FEBRU 190-2090
[NStJRANCE PREHIUI4/FEBRLI 191-2090
iNSURANCE PREHIIJN/FEBRU 193-2090
INSURANCE PREMIUIq/FEBRU 300-2090
INSURANCE PREHILN/FEBRU 330-2090
INSURANCE PRENIUH/FEBRU 340-20~0
INSURANCE PREMIUH/FEBRU 001-150-99~-5250
RIGHT-OF-iZAY NEED CONTR 100-166-999-5602
13,979.09
3,836.81
3,981.84
135.95
669.7~
163.88
302.11
622.93
112,64
9,817.49
23,384.99
9,817.69
13562 02/03/94 00024~ PETROLANE
13562 02/03/94 0002/,8 PETROLANE
13562 02/03/96 00024,8 PETROLANE
FUEL 190-180-999-5263
FUEL 001-162-999-5263
FUEL/TCSO 1g0-180-999-5263
47.95
252.89
88.13
388.97
13563 02/03/94 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REINBIJAN 001-100-999-5258
13563 02/03/9~ 000269 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REINS/JAN 001-150-999-5262
13563 02/03/94 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REINS/JAM 001-150-999-5250
13563 02/03/96 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REINB/JAN 001-150-999-5265
13563 02/03/96 000269 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REINB/JAN 001-161-999-5260
13563 02/03/96 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REINB/JAN 001-163-999-5260
13563 02/03/96 000269 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH/TCSO 190-180-999-5222
13563 02/03/94 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH/TCSO 190-180-999-5260
13563 02/03/96 000269 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH/TCSO 190-181-999-5301
13563 02/03/9~ 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASN/TCSO 190-183-999-5320
13563 02/03/94 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASN/TCSD 190-183-999-5340
13563 02/03/94 000269 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH/TCSO 190-183-999-5370
7.96
1.75
17.63
16.00
61.08
43.19
19.40
49.06
59.03
18.98
27.31
22.04
3~3.63
13564 02/03/94 000253 POSTNASTER
13564 02/03/94 000253 PORTNASTER
EXPRESS HAIL DEC/JAN
EXPRESS HAIL DEC/JAN
190-180-999-5230
001-161-999-5230
9.95
13
13565 02/03/94 00025/, PRESS-ENTERPRISE COleAN SUBSCRIPTION 190-180-999-5226
13566 02/03/94 000262 RAN(NO UATER 11/22-12/20 193-180-999-52/d)
23.92
2,015.43
VOUC' CITY OF TENECULA
02/0. 17:07 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VEND(XI VENDOR ITL=M ACCOUNT
NtAqBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCltIPTIC)N NLliBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
13566 02/03/9/, 0Q0262 RANCHO kIATER 11/22-12/20 19Q-180-999-5260
13566 02/03/~ QQQZ62 RANCHO UATER 11/15-1Z/14 193-180-999-5260
13566 02/03/9/, 0Q0262 RANCHO UATER 11/15-12/14 193-180-999-5260
13566 02/03/94 000262 RANCHOL~ATER 11/15-12/14 193-180-999-5240
13566 02/03/9~ 000262 RANCHO k~ATER 11/15-12/14 193-180-999-5240
13566 02/03/~ 000262 RANCliO k/ATER 11/15-12/14 193-180-999-5240
13566 02/03/9~ 000262 RANCHO ~ATER 11/15-12/14 193-180-999-52~0
13566 02/03/94 000262 RANClIO tIATER 11112-12/14 193-180-999-5260
13566 02/03/94 000262 RANCHOIdATER 11/15-12/14 193-180-999-5240
13566 02/03/94 000262 RANCHO IdATER 11118-12116 193-180-999-5240
135&& 02/03/94 000262 RANCHO gATER 11/18-12/16 193-180-999-5240
13566 02/03/9~ 000262 RANCHO bUtTER 11/18-12/16 193-180-999-5260
13566 02/03/9~ 000262 RANCHO tdATER 11/18-12/16 190-180-999-5240
13566 02/03/9~ 000262 RANCHO IdATER 11/18-12/16 190-180-999-5260
13566 02/03/94 000262 RANCHO I~ATER 11122-12/20 193-180-999-5240
13566 02/03/94 000262 RANCHO UATER 11/29-12/30 190-180-999-5240
193.27
55.21
42.79
59.70
48.89'
66.44
56.41
161.85
27.96
108.24
53.72
66.59
28.99
27.~0
53.92
3,141.24
13567 02/03/94 000285 SIR SPEEDY 1000 BUSINESS LICENSE 001-160-9~-5222
13567 02/03/94 000285 SIR SPEEDY TAX 001-140-~-5222
13~/"02/03/94 000291 SPEE DEE OIL CHANGE & T REPAIRS 310-164-999-5214
13~ 02/03/96 000291 SPEE DEE OIL CHANGE & T REPAZRS/PU 310-16~-999-5214
156.63
12.14
20.99
77.87
168.77
13569 02/03/94 000303 TANGET STORE
RECREATION SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5301
192.32
192.32
13570 02/03/94 000307 TEMECULA TROPHY OD.
1357O 02/03/94 000307 TENEOULA TROPHY CO.
2 SETS OF POOL TROPHIES 190-182-999-5301
TROPHIES 190-182-999-5301
25.86
25.86
51.72
13571 02/03/94 000319 TOMARK SPORTS, INC. 4 UHEEL BARKER 190-180-999-5301
13571 02/03/94 000319 TONARK SPORTS, INC, FREIGHT 190-180-999-5301
13571 02/03/94 000319 TONARK SPORTS, INC. TAX 190-180-999-5301
200.00
13.15
15.50
228.65
13572 02/03/94 000320 TCNNE CENTER STATIONERS OFFICE SUPPLIES
001-163-999-5220
13573 02/03/94 000322 UNIGLONE BUTTERFIELD TR RON RORERTS S.F. AIRFAR
13573 02/03/94 000322 UNZGLONE BUTTERFIELD TR CONF/RP & RR
13573 02/03/94 000322 UNZGLONE BUTTERFIELD TR CONF/RP & RR
001 - 100-999-5258
001 - 100-999-5258
001-100-999-5258
138.00
1/,4.00
1~.00
426.00
13574 02/03/94 000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE 2 SETS OF ONIFORMS CLRA 100-164-999-5243
13574 02/03/94 000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE ONIFOR!q RENTAL 190-180-999-5243
13574 02/03/94 000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE UNIFRON RENTAL 190-180-999-5243
13574 02/03/94 QOQ326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE IJNIFORM RENTAL 190-180-999-524k3
13574 02/03/94 000326 ONZTOG RENTAL SERVICE RENTAL/UNIFORm 360-199-999-5250
13574 02/03/94 000326 UNZTOG RENTAL SERVICE BATS/RUG RENTAL 340-199-999-5250
16.10
16.10
16.10
3~.50
3~.50
140.30
13573 02/03/94 000342 ~INDSOR PARTNERS - RANC
13576 02/03/94 0003/,5 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI
13~ ~2/03/W, 000348 ZIGLER, GAlL
135~ J2/03/9~ 0003/~ ZIGLER, GAIL
RENT FEBRUARY
LEASE AGREEMENT; 5100 c
REFRESIH4EMTS/COUNCIL 2/
PARK DEDICATIOR/REFRESH
340-199-999-523~
330-1~9-~(~-5239
001-100-~-5~0
1~0-180-~)~-5381
29,665.15
2,9~.95
252.50
29,665.15
2,969.95
312.50
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TENECIJLA
02/03/9/, 17:07 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOIl VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NUMBER DATE INNBER NNqE DESCRIPTION NUllER
ITEN
NIOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
13582 02/03/9/* 0(X337/* SOUTHERN PALIF NDZSOM 12/23-01/26 540-199-999-52/*0
13582 O2/O3/9/, Q0037/* SOUTHERN PALIF EDISON 12/02-12/30/94 191-18Q-999-5319
13582 02/03/9/, 00037/* SOUTHERN PALIF EDIt)el 12/02-01/0& 191-180-999-5319
13582 02/03/9~ 00037/* SOUTHERN PALIF EDISON 9/09-12102 191-180-999-5319
13582 O2/03/94 O0O37/* SOUTHERN PALIF EDISm 12/Z0-01/Z2 190-181-999-52/*0
13582 O2/03/94 00037/, SOUTHERN PALIF EDISON 12/23-01/26 191-180-999-52/*0
13582 02/03/94 00037/* SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 12/23-01/26 191-180-999-5319
13582 O2/03/94 OO03?/* SOUTHERN PALIF EDISON 12/23-01/26 193-180-999-52/*0
13583 02/03/94 0003?5 SOUTHERN PALZFONNIA TEL PC550 MOTOROLA DIGZTAL 001-120-999-5208
13583 02/03/94 000375 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TEL MOTOROLA CIG LZGHT ADAP 001-120-999-5208
13583 02/03/94 000375 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TEL AC CHARGER CONDITIONFIt 001-120-~-5208
13583 02/03/94 000375 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TEL SLIH EXTENDED LIFE SATT 001-120-999-5208
13583 02/03/94 000375 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TEL SLIM EXTENDED LIFE BATT 320-199-999-5208
13583 02/03/94 000375 SOUTHERN PAL]FONNIA TEL TAX 001-120-999-5208
13583 02/03/94 000375 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TEL TAX 320-199-999-5208
13503 02/03/94 000375 SOUTHERN PAL]FORNIA TEL NC]6ILE REMOVAL 001-110-999-5208
13583 02/03/94 000375 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TEL 909-202-/.761 SN DEC 001-100-999-5208
6,64~.01
201.83
762.20
3,718.15
503.66
?.5.00
55.00
67.00
67.00
2/* .88
5.19
50.00
193.53
13,097.83
661.60
13584 02/03/94 000~00 ALEXANDER HAMILTON INST RENEI4 NANAGER'$ LEGAL 001-150-999-5228
13585 02/03/94 000~02 BERG, HARK REINiS. iiORK BOOTS OU1-162-999-52/*2
13586 02/03/94 000/,08 AGRICREDZT ACCEPTANCE C 67000/,180910QQ62/TRACTO 190-180-999-5239
/*5.60
100.00
846.02
8/,6.02
13587 02/03/94 000~0g VALLEN SAFETY SUPPLY SAFETY SHOVEL 6981 100-164-999-5218
13587 02/03/94 009409 VALLEN SAFETY SUPPLY FREIGHT 100-164-999-5218
13587 02/03/94 00040~ VALLEN SAFETY SUPPLY TAX 100-164-~-5218
83.70
4.94
95.12
13588 02/03/94 009414 LONGS DRUG STORE FILe PURCHASING 190-180-990-5250
49.32
49.32
13589 02/03/94 000~23 H & H CRAFT & FLORAL SU RECREATIONAL PROGRAM 190-180-999-5301
13.33
13.33
13590 02/03/94 000/(.26 RANCHO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL JANITORIAL SUPPLIES; CI 540-199-999-5212
13590 02/03/94 000/,26 RANCHO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL SUPPLIES 190-181-999-5212
13590 02/03/94 000/,26 RANCHO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL SUPPLIES 190-181-999-5212
260.51
87.29
35.58
13591 02/03/94 000430 GROUP AMERICA - VOLUNTA INS PREMIUM FEB 9/* 001-2510
13591 02/03/94 O00430 GROUP AMERICA - VOLUMTA INS PRIMION FEB 94 100-2510
13591 02/03/94 00(030 GROUP AMERICA - VOLUNTA INS PREMIUM FEB 94 100-2510
13592 02/03/94 000431 NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH, INSURANCE PREelUMIFEBRU 001-2340
13592 02/03/94 000431 NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH, INSUR~CE PREMIUM/FEBRU 100-2~0
13592 02/03/94 OOIX31 NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH, INSUltAlICE PRENIUM/FEBRU 190-23~0
13592 02/03/94 000431 NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH, INSURANCE PRENIUM/FEBRU 191-23/,0
13592 02/03/94 000~31 NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH, INSURANCE PREMIUM/FEBRU 193-2340
13592 02/03/94 000431 NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH, INSURANCE PRENIUM/FEBRU 300-23~0
13592 02/03/94 000431 RATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH, INSURANCE PREM]UM/FEBRU :330-23~0
13592 02/03/94 000431 RATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH, INSURANCE PREM]IN/FEBRU 3/*0-23~0
13592 02/03/94 000~31 NATIONAL DENTAL NEALTN, INSURANCE PRENIIJN/FEIPJJ 001-1180
13592 02103/94 000/,31 RATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH, INSURANCE PREMIUN/FEBRU 001-150-f99-5250
621.58
170.61
7.31
8.94
4.06
16.25
16.25
4,8.75
VOUC'/''' CITY OF TENECULA
02/0, 17:07 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOIl ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDDI~ VENI)OR ]TEll ACCOtJtlT
NLliBER DATE ~R ~ DESCItIPTION NNR
[TEN
ANOUNT
CHECK
AI, IDtRIT
13593 02/03/96 000672 PARADISE CHEVROLET CiTY HANAGER ~HICLE FIR 310-110-999-5216
94,1.85
941.85
13596 02/03/96 000693 TARGET STORE BILLING SONY VIDEO BATTERY PACK 100-16~-999-5218
13594 02/03/96 000693 TARGET STORE BILLING VIDEO CASSETTE TAPES 100-166-999-5218
13596 02/03/96 000693 TARGET STORE BILLING POt. ARIOD FILM (DOUBLE P 100-166-999-5218
13596 02/03/96 000693 TARGET STORE BILLING PRICE DIFFERENCE 100-166-999-5218
13596 02/03/96 00G693 TARGET STORE BILLING TAX 100-16~-999-5218
26.99
59.93
159.90
10.78-
18.98
253.0~
13595 02/03/96 0Q0537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED! 11/30-12/31
13595 02/03/96 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED] 11/30-12/31
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
350.3~
13596 02/03/96 000560 G. NElL CORPANIES DGG-O~6; BRAVO CAItDS 001-140-999-5220
13596 02/03/96 000560 G. HEIL CC)I!PAN]ES DGG-0637; TIME CARDS 001-160-999-5220
13596 02/03/96 000560 G. NElL CCHPANIES DGG-0816; SUGGESTION CA 001-160-999-5220
13596 02/03/96 000560 G. NElL CCIIPANIES DGG-0806; TEM CARDS 001-160-999-5220
13596 02/03/94 000560 G. NEIL CCIlPANIES FREIGHT 001-160-999-5220
13596 02/03/96 000560 G. NElL COHPANIES TAX 001-160-999-5220
6.90
6.90
6.90
6.90
6.57
.01
3A.18
13597 02/03/96 000565 PAC TEL CELLULAR - S.D. SD 1075255011596 001-140-999-5208
13597 02/03/96 000545 PAC TEL CELLULAR - S.D. SD-1075255/MJH 001-160-999-5208
135 32103194 000558 ADVANCED HOBILECOII4 HOBZLE SERVICE 320-109-999-5209
13598 02/03/96 000558 ADVANCED 11)BILECON NOIITHLY SERVICE 320-199-999-5209
94.18
116.6~
210.82
758.00
135~ 02/03/96 000576 HESA HONES CHANGE OF PERMITS 001-2660
13599 02/03/96 000576 MESA HONES CREDITS/LIBRARY FEES 120-109-6237
13600 02/03/96 000587 NUNOZ, HARIO N. OLD TOMI SR CENTER/l/16 1~0-181-~-5250
13600 02/03/96 000587 HUNOZ, MARIO N. OLD TOUN SR CTR 1/28/94 190-181-~-5250
87.96
9,300.00
200.00
200. O0
9,387.94
600.00
13601 02/03/96 000602 DEAN'S PHOTO
FILM AND FILM PROCESSIN 001-162-~-5250
19.6~
19.6~
13602 02/03/94 000603
13603 02/03/96 000638
13603 02/03/96 000638
13603 '02/03/94 000638
13606 02/03/96 00064.3
13606 02/03/94 000643
CABLE & WIRELESS COlliNd
CALIFONNIA DEPARTHENT 0
CALIFORNIA DEPARTHENT 0
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT 0
FONTHER HARDWARE
FORTHER HARDVARE
DEC 16-JAR 16 XCA811636 320-199-999-5208
SH] FEES 001-2280
SH] FEES 001-22~0
SH] FEES 001-162-4229
MISt. SUPPLIES AND EQUI 1~0-180-~-5212
HARDWARE SUPPLIES 1~0-180-999-5212
1,659.21
776.56
2,038.09
140.7'J-
172.60
1,659.21
2,675.92
13605 02/03/96 000678 RIVERSIDE COUNTY HEALTH PERIlIT TO OPERATE POOL 190-183-999-5310
200.00
200.00
13606 02/03/94 000686
13606 02/03/94 000686
17,606 02/03/94 000686
17,606 02/03/94 000686
13606 02/03/94 000686
13606 02/03/96 000686
VISIBLE COMPUTER SUPPLY
VISIBLE COMPUTER SIJPPLY
VISIBLE CCltPUTER SUPPLY
VISIBLE CCIIPUTER SUPPLY
VISIBLE COMPUTER SUPPLY
VISIBLE CCRPUTER SUPPLY
200; RQ-211611; 1993 W'2 001-160-999-5220
200; RQ-7910E; HATCHING 001-160-999-5220
200; RQ-9919C; 1993 109 001-160-999-5220
200; RQ-7951862; DOUBLE 001-160-999-5220
FREIGHT 001-140-999-5220
TAX 001-160-~-5220
51.60
19.15
30.15
15.78
10.50
9.03
136.01
136~ ,2/03/96 000765 GROUP AHERICA PREMZIJM FOR FEBRUARY 001-2360 570.00
VOUCHRE2 CiTY OF TENECULA
02/03/94 17:07 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ]TEN ACCOUNT
NUI4BER DATE NUI4BER leAHE DESCRIPTION NII4BER
ITER
AROUNT
CHECK
ANOUNT
13607 02103196 000765 GROUP NERICA PRERItll FOR FEIRUAIIY 100-2360
13607 02103/96 000765 GROUP ARERICA PREMIUM FOR FEBRUARY 190-2360
13607 02/03/96 000765 GROUP N, IERICA PRERIUN FOR FEBRUARY 191-2360
13607 02/03194 000765 GROUP ABlERIrA PItENIUN FOR FEBRUARY 193-Z360
13607 02/03/96 000765 GROUP ANER!rA liEIliUM FOR FEBRUARY 300-2360
13607 02103196 000765 GROUP ABlERIrA PRERILI! FOR FEBRUARY 320-2360
136O7 02/03/9~ OO0765 GROUP ANERIrA liENZUM FOR FEBRUARY 330-2360
13607 O2/03/94 0OO?65 GROUP AMERICA P~EMIUM FOR FEBRUARY 3~0-2360
13607 O2/O3/96 OO0765 GROUP ANERZrA PRENIUM FOR FEBRUARY OOl-2380
13607 O2/03/94 000765 GROUP AMERICA PREMiUM FOR FEBRUARY lOO-2380
13607 O2/03/94 000765 GROUP AMERICA PREMIU!~ FOR FEBRUARY 190-2380
136O7 O2/03/94 OO0?65 GROUP ~XERIrA liEmUM FOR FEBRUARY 191-2380
13607 02/03/94 000765 GROUP AHERIrA PRERIUM FOR FEBRUARY 193-2380
13607 O2/O3/94 OOO?65 GROUP ARERIrA liENIUM FOR FEBRUARY 3O0-238O
13607 O2/O3/94 000?65 GROUP ANERIrA liEIliUM FOR FEBRUARY 320-2380
13607 02/03/94 OO0765 GROUP AMERICA PREMIUM FOR FEBRUARY 33O-238O
13607 O2/O3/94 OO0765 GROUP AHERIrA PREMIUM FOR FEBRUARY 3A0-2380
13607 02/03/94 OOQ?65 GROUP ARERIrA PREMIUM FC~ FEBRUARY 001-25OO
13607 02/03/96 OO0765 GROUP AJ~ERZCA PRERZUM FOR FEBRUARY lOO-25OO
13607 02/03/96 000?65 GROUP AMERICA PREMIUM FOR FEBRUARY 190-2500
13607 02/O3/96 OO0?65 GROUP ANERZrA PREMiUM FOR FEBRUARY 191-2500
13607 02/03/96 000?65 GROUP AMERICA liEIliUM FOR FEBRUARY 193-2500
13607 O2/03/96 000?65 GROUP AMERICA PREMIUM FOR FEBRUARY 3OO-25OO
13607 02/03/96 000765 GROUP A~ERICA PREMIUM FOR FEBRUARY 320-2500
13607 02/03/96 000765 GROUP AHERZCA PREMiUM FOR FEBRUARY 330-25OO
13607 O2/03/96 OOO?65 GROUP AMERICA PREMiUM FOR FEBRUARY 3~0-2300
13608 02/03/96 000770 UCR EXTENSION CEQA ISSUES TRAINING 001-161-~-5261
128.25
133,00
6.28
16.72
6.75
9.50
9.50
9.50
932.78
226.77
196.67
5.89
20.91
7,76
18.67
8.7~
9.87
202.01
49.45
42.82
1.30
1.71
6.11
1.92
2.17
175 .OO
2,619.63
175.00
13609 02/03/96 O007gg CAL]FGRNIA HOHZCIDE ZNV REGISTRATIOR/2 ]NVESTIG 001-170-~-5261
150.00
150.00
1:$610 02/03/94 000820 W!NCHAK, KRIS MORKERS CONP FOR JAR 94 001-1182
1:$610 02/03/94 000820 WlNCHAK, KRIS LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND P lOO-180-~-5226
138.22-
650.00
311.78
13611 02/03/94 000863 IPHA NB4BERSHZP/GRANT YATES OO1-150-~-5226
210.00
210.00
13612 02/03/94 000878 BOYS & GIRLS CLUB DRAW 13 001-1500
13612 02/03/94 000878 BOYS & GIRLS CLUB DRAW 15 OO1-1500
13612 02/03/94 000878 BOYS & GIRLS CLUB DEBIT NENOAINDERBILLED 001-1500
13612 02/03/96 000878 BOYS & GIRLS CLUB DRAW 16 OO1-1500
13612 02/03/96 OO0878 BOYS & GIRLS CLUB DRAW 16 O01-1500
13612 02/03/96 00O878 BOYS & GIRLS CLUB DRAW 12 OO1-15OO
13613 02/03/96 000885 ACCIDENT RECONSTRUCTION SUBSCRIPTION RENEMAL 001-170-999-5261
16,600.25
8,572.82
.50
20,627.27
349.30'
1,726.02
f&.O0
~6,975.56
96.00
13614 02/03/94 000~10 KOLL NANAGEMENT SERVICE FEB. RENT/TEEN CTR lOO-182-;-523~
13615 02/03/94 0009~7 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C NISC. BLUEPRINT REliODU OO1-163-~-5260
13616 02/03/94 000969 GICN RENTALS PORTABLE NELDER lOO-166-999-5238
3,376.95
623.15
56.61
3,3?6.95
623.15
1
/
voucF""
o2/o~. 17=07
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR
NUNliER DATE NLMeBER NAME
13617 02/03/9/, 000950 CALIFORNIAN - DISPLAY
13617 02/03/94 000950 CAL/FORN]AN - DISPLAY
13618 02/03/94 00C)~74 RUIZ, CPjkIG
13619 02/03/9A OO098O COAST IRRZGATIOH SUPPLY
13619 02/03/94 00O980 COAST IRRIGATION SUPPLY
13620 02/03/9A OO0992 P, ANONA TIRE
13621 02/03/9~ 000993 FREEDOM COFFEE, INC.
13621 02/03/9~ 000993 FREEDOM COFFEE, INC.
13621 02/03/9~ 000993 FREEDOM COFFEE, INC.
13622 02/03/9A 001047 BOAT TECH MARINE & SKI
13623 02/03/9~ 00105A CAI. ZFORHZA BUILDING OFF
1362~ 02/03/94 001076 ~ESTERN IJASTE
1362~ 02/03/9~ 001076 ~ESTERH ~ASTE
13& 2/03/04 001103 FREEDOIl MATERIALS
13625 02/03/94 001103 FREEDOM MATERZALS
13626 02/03/9A OO1122 SCOTCH PAINT CORPORATIO
13627 0210319~ 001209 VAULT, THE
13628 02/03/94 0012/,8 PAPER DIRECT
13629 02/03/94 001280 PETROLANE - REPAIRS
13630 02/03/9A 001293 RIVERSIDE COUNTY AGRISU
13631 02/03/94 001295 BEHAVIOR ANALYS]~ TRAIN
13632 02/03/9~ 001296 RED LION HOTEL
13633 02/03/9~ 001297 CALIFORNIA TRUCK EQUII~
13634 02/03/94 001298 UNIVERSITY EXTENSION
13635 02/03/94 00129~ RIVERSIDE COUNTY BUILDI
CITY OF TENECULA
VOLJCIIER/CNECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTIOM
PAID ADS FOR CHRISTHAS
DISCX3UNT
REIMB/CEGA gORKSHOP
IRRIGATION PARTS AND EQ
IRRIGATION PARTS AND EQ
HOOD/BRAKE CABLE
CREDIT
AC_r~_JNT
NUllER
190-180-999-5254
190-180-999-5254
001-161-999-5261
190-180-~99-5212
190-180-999-5212
310-162-9~-521/,
3~0-199-999-5250
COFFEE SERVICE FOR CiTY 340-199-999-5250
COFFEE SERVICE FOR CiTY 3Z,0-199-999-5250
REPLACE REAR TIRE
CLASS I MEMBERSHIP LABE
RENTAL ON TOILETS
RENTAL/PORTABLE TOILETS
8 BAGS 100 LB SILICA SA
TAX
PAINT & SUPPLIES
MICROFOM & DATA STORAGE
CHRISTleAS CARDS
VEHICLE RAINTEN/iCE
RENEU REGISTRATION/PEST
TRAINING CLASS FEB 1~-1
CHIA CONF/2 ]NVEST]GATO
REPLACE TOOL BO~ HINGE
I,R:)RKSHUP/CRAIG BUIZ
COUNTY ORDINANCE
001-170-999-521/,
001-1(>2-999-5228
190-180-999-5238
190-180-99~-5238
100-164-~-5218
100-16~-999-5218
100-164-999-5218
001-120-99~-5250
001-162-999-5222
310-180-999-521~
190-180-999-5226
001-170-999-5261
001-170-999-5261
100-164-999-5215
001-161-999-5261
001-120-~9-5222
TOTAL CHECKS
ITEM
AHOUNT
198.60
19.86-
1A5.00
515.01
57.96
39.38
123.15-
121.56
10.00
192.23
30.00
455.00
200.00
25.20
1.95
162.87
176.68
58.85
10.00
228.00
1~8.2z~
30.60
195.00
5.00
PAGE 7
CHECK
AHOUNT
178.74
145.00
5?2.97
39.38
8.A1
192.23
30.00
655.00
27.15
162.87
176.68
58.85
10.00
228.00
1~8.2A
30.60
195.00
5.00
173,132.06
VOUCHRE2
02/10/94
16:16
CITY OF TENECLILA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOil ALL PERIODS
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
100 GAS TAX FUND
1~0 CONI4UNITY GERV]CES DISTRICT
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
210 CAPITAL I!4PROVENENT PROJ FIJtR)
250 CAPITAL PROJECTS - TCSD
280 REDEVELOPI4ENT AGENCY - CZP
300 INSURANCE FUND
310 VEHICLES FUNO
INFORIqATION SYSTEHS
330 COPY CENTER FUND
340 FACILITIES
TOTAL
NIXINT
4),267.3&
10,316.67
9,119.27
245.67
2,01).45
6,759.50
6,458.20
263.61
4,727.10
243.88
8F,,0~1.13
vou(r CITY OF TBIECULA
02/~ 16:16 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NLIHBER DATE NDI4BER NMIE DESCHIPTIOR NLIiBER
ITEM
AleXlilT
CHECK
ANOUNT
13535 02/09/94 001306 HARCH AIR FORCE BASE ROON DEPOSIT
001-100-999-5258
200.00
200.00
353813 02/10/96 OOO~ FIRSTAX (EDD) 0004~4 SOl 001-2070
353813 02/10/9A 000/.-~ FIRSTAX (EDD) 000644 ND! 100-2070
353813 02/10/9~ 0004,/~ FIRSTAX (EDD) 00064~ SOl 190-2070
353813 02/10/9~ 000~ FIRSTAX (EDO) 0004/k~ SOl 191-2070
353813 02/10/96 00~ FIRSTAX (EDD) OOL~.~ SOl 193-2070
353813 02/10/96 OOO444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 00044~ SOl 3Q0-2070
353813 02/10/96 ~ FIRSTAX CEDD) ~ SOl 320-2070
353813 02/10/96 000/~-~ FIRSTAX (EDD) 00O644 NDZ 33Q-2070
353813 02/10/96 00~ FIRSTAX CEDD) 000~ SOZ 3~0-2070
353813 02/10/94 OOO~ FIRSTAX (EDD) ~ STATE 001-2070
353813 02/10/96 000~ FIRSTAX (EDD) 00e/:~ STATE 1Q0-2070
353813 02/10/94 00042~ FIRSTAX (EDD) 00~ STATE 190-Z070
353813 02/10/96 O00444 FIRSTAX CE003 OOO~.-~ STATE 191-2070
353813 02/10/96 OOO444 FIRSTAX CEDD) OCX:X4~ STATE 193-2070
353813 02/10/94 0004~ FIRSTAX CEDD) 00~.~ STATE 3Q0-2070
353813 02/10/96 00O4/,4 FIRSTAX (EDD) OOe~ STATE 32O-2070
353813 02/10/94 000~44 FIRSTAX (EDD) QOO~.~ STATE 330-2070
3737" 02/10/9~ 000283 FIRSTAX (ZRS) 000283 FEDERAL 001-2070
37'~ 02/10/9~ 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 100-2070
373762 02/10/9~ 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 190-2070
373762 02/10/9~ 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 191-2070
373762 02/10/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 193-2070
373762 02/10/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 300-2070
373762 02/10/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 320-2070
373762 02/10/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 3)0-2070
373762 02/10/9/, 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 HEDiCARE 001-2070
373762 02/10/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 NEDICARE 100-2070
373762 02/10/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 HEDICARE 190-2070
373762 02/10/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 HEDICARE 191-2070
373762 02/10/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 NEDICARE 193-2070
373762 02/10/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 NEDICARE )00-2070
373762 02/10/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 NEDICARE )20-2070
373762 02/10/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 HEDICARE 330-2070
373762 02/10/96 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 NEDICARE 3/,0-2070
397685 01/28/96 001300 FIRSTAX (QTR ADJUSTNENT 001300 ADJ TAXE 001-2070
1,261.96
302.10
27'5.68
8.56
28.56
9.90
32.37
10.25
12.39
2,655.67
676.68
679.18
20.96
25.13
55.29
15.71
9,973.83
2,739.06
2,201.81
82.55
245.0/,
81.28
2/,6.26
89.27
2,847.32
673.88
614.62
19.06
22.10
22.86
27,64
9.72
5,718.79
20,022,28
13639 02/10/96 HAYO, GARY TCSO REFUND/14AYO, GARY 19O-183-6982
30.00
30.00
136~0 02/10/96 BORDERS, KIN TCSD REFUND/BOIIDERS, KI 19O'183'6982
90.00
9O.00
13641 02/10/94 i/ALLY DYE CONSTRUCTION ENG REFUND/1JALLY DYE CO 001'163'4379
40.00
13642 02/10/96 LULY'S BL REFUND/LULY'S 001-19O-6056
35.00
35,00
13643 02/10/96 SPORTS LOOK PIZT. A EL REINB/SPORTS LOOK P! 001-19O-6056
13c, 02/10/96 000101 APPLE ONE TEI4POitARY SERVICES FOR 280-19O-999-5250
35.00
103.20
35.00
103.20
VOUCHRE2
02/10/96
16:16
CITY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CNECKREGISTER
FOG ALL PERlOGS
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NLIIER
CHECK
DATE
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
ITEM
AROUNT
CHECK
136~5
13~5
136J~
1:3647
13647
13~J,8
13648
13648
136~8
13648
13649
13649
13649
13649
13649
13649
13650
13650
13~50
02/10/96.
02/10/96
02/10/96
02/10/94
02/10/.9~
02/10/96
02/10/9~
02/10/9/,
02/10/96
02/10/96
02/10/96
02/10/9/,
02/10/94,
02/lO/We
02/10/96
02/10/96
02/10/96
02110196
02/10/96
0001~8
0001~8
0001~6
00018~
000184.
OOO184.
000184
000184
000184,
0O0186
000186
CITICORP NORTH NERICA
CITICORP NOGTH HRICA
COUNTS UNLIMITED
FEDERAL EXPRESS
FEDERAL EXPRESS
GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GTE CAL1FOGNIA INCOGPOR
GTE CALIFOGNIA INCOGPOR
GTE CALIFOGNIA INCORPOR
GTE CALIFOGNIA INCORPOR
GTE CALIFOGNIA ]NCORPOR
GTE CALIFOGNIA ]NCORPOR
HANKS HARDtIARE
HANKS HARDMARE
HANKS HARDVARE
PHONE SYSTEH PAYMENT
PHONE SYSTEM PAYMENT
TRAFFIC CENSUS PROGRN4
PRIOGITY HAIL
PRIOGITY HAIL
OGWiNIZER/PORTFOLIO
NISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISC. OFFICE SIJPPLIES
RETURNED OGGANIZER
909-69~-1900 JAN
009-6W,-1989 JAN
009-69~-1900 DEC
009-694-6400 JAN
009-695-3539 JAN
009-699-2309
MISC. SMALL TOOLS & SUP
INV)~12f
MISC. SUPPLIES ' NUTS,
13651 02/10/96 000196 ZCHA RETIREMENT TRUST 6 O001f~ DEF CONP
1)651 02/10/96 0001~4 Z(34A RETIRElENT TRUST 6 000196 DEF COI4P
13651 02/10/94 0001~, ICNA RETIRElENT TRUST 6 0001~(, DEF CONP
13651 02/10/96 000196 [CHA RETIRElENT TRUST 6 000196 DEF COl4P
13651 02/10/96 000194 [CMA RETIREMENT TRUST 6 0Q0196 DEF COMP
13651 02/10/96 OO0196 IC~A RETIREMENT TRUST 4 Q00196 DEF COW
13651 02/10/94 000196 ICNA RETIRElENT TRUST 4 OOO196 DEF COMP
JENNACO
LUNCH & STUFF CATERING
02/10/9~
02/10/94
13652
13653
000201
000214
PROVIDE CUSTODIAL HAINT
02107C/C MEETING
13654 02/10/96 000246 PERS EleLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 PER REDE
13654 02/10/96 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 PER REDE
13656 02/10/96 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 PERS RET
13654 02/10/96 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRBI 000246 PERS RET
13654 02/10/96 000246 PERS ENPLOVEES' RETIREM 000246 PERS RET
13656 02/10/94 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREN 000246 PERS RET
13654 02/10/94 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 PERS RET
13654 02/10/96 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 PERS RET
13656 02/10/96 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 PERS RET
13654 02/10/96 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 PERS RET
13654 02/10/96 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 PERS RET
13654 02/10/96 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 SURVIVOR
13654 02/10/96 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 SURVIVOR
13656 02/10/94 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' ItETIREN 000246 SURVIVOR
320 - 199- 999 - 5391
320-2800
100-164-999-5406
001-110-999-52:50
001-140-999-5230
001-140-999-5220
001-140-999-5220
001-140-999-5220
001-140-999-5220
001-140-999-5220
320-199-999-5208
320-199-999-5208
320-199-999-5208
320-199-999-5208
320-199-999-5208
320-199-999-5208
344)-199-999-5242
100-164-999-5242
100-164-999-5242
001-2080
100-2080
190-2080
191-2080
19~-2080
300-2080
340-2080
100-182-999-5212
001-I00-999-5260
001-2130
100-2130
001-2390
100-2390
190-2390
191-2390
193-2390
3000-2300
320-2300
330-2390
340-2390
100-Z$90
2~7.~7
1,12~.60
800.00
19.00
9.50
73.00
36.53
47.95
17.53-
52.53-
983.91
1,152.07
415.35-
55O.95
21.37
20.3~
~.41
118.~
2,173.01
564.16
496.96
3~.08
41.66
25.36
50.00
400. O0
80.00
107.35
107.35
11,364.78
2,?03.05
2,459.15
80.06
284.39
95.92
232.35
122.01
58.24
12.54
13.02
1,427.57
800.00
28.5O
87.42
2,313.29
)
236.52
3,385.23
400. O0
80.00
VOUC'~'' CITY OF TBIECULA
02/1, 16:16 VOUCHER/CHECI~ REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEN ACCCXJNT
NUNBER DATE NUNBER NAME DESCRIPTIOR NtBIBER
ITEM
ANOUNT
CHErJC
AIKX. INT
13656 02/10/94 00024~ PERS EMPLOYEES' RET]REN 08024~ SURVIVOR 191-23~0
13656 02/10/96 0002~6 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 0802/~ SURVIVOR 193-23~0
13656 02/10/96 OOO266 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREH 080266 SURVIVOR 300-2390
13656 02/10/W, 0002/,6 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREN O002~& SURVIVOR 320-23~0
13656 02/10/W, 00024~ PERS EHPLOYEES' RETIREN 000266 SURVIVOR
13656 02/10/W, 0002/~ PERS EMPLOYEES' RETZRB! 0002/,6 SURVIVOR :~0-23~0
.62
1.~4
.93
.~r3'
17,750.18
13655 02/10/9~ 000269 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH 001-150-~9-5260
13655 02/10/~6 000269 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH 320-1~-~-5262
13655 02/10/94 000269 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH 001-162-~-5262
13655 02/10/94 000269 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH 001-161-~j~-5250
13655 02/10/g6 000269 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH 081-161-~-5220
13655 02/10/W, 000269 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH 001-161-~;~-5258
13655 02/10/94 000269 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH 081-1~3-~-5260
13655 02/10/9/+ 000269 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH 081-163-999-5220
18.71
27.85
6.57
12.~3
10.73
30.00
55.5~
56.57
218.~0
13656 02/10/9/+ 000251 PLANNING CENTER, INC. T DEVELOPMENT CODE PROCES 001'161'999'52~8
13656 02/10/9/+ 000251 PLANNING CENTER, INC. T GENERAL PLAN CONTRACT 001-161-~-5248
281.56
593./~
875.00
13657 02/10/9/+ 000253 POSTMASTER KAImF. A lID CLC~__.~RE NOTIC 001-163-~-5230
13~, ,~2/10/9/+ 00025/+ PRESS-ENTERPRISE CClFAN DISPLAY RDVERTZSEIIENT/S 1~0-180-~-525~
56.8?.
133.20
56.82
133.20
13659 02/10/9/+ 000268 RIVERSIDE COUNTY HANITA JANUARY 94 K-RAT PAY!fEN 001-2300
3,000.00
13660 02/10/9/+ 000277 S & S ARTS AND CRAFTS ESCAPADES GAlE 190-180-999-5301
13660 02/10/9/+ 000277 S & S ARTS AND CRAFTS CAULDRON OF HALLMEN I 1~0-180-~)9-5301
13&~0 02/10/94 000277 S & S ARTS AND CRAFTS RAG RASETS 1~0-180-~-5301
13660 02/10/9/+ 000277 S & S ANTS AND C!L~FTS PLAYTIME PUPPETS 190-180-999-5301
13660 02/10/9/+ 000277 S & S ARTS AND CRAFTS BINGO 190-180-g99-5301
13660 02/10/9/+ 000277 $ & S ARTS AND CRAFTS FOAM DART GARE SAFTEE 190-180-999-5301
13660 02/10/96 000277 S & S ARTS AND CRAFTS AC-63-BUTTOR PARTS g/llY 190-180-999-5301
13660 02/10/9/+ 000277 S & S ANTS AND CRAFTS BIGG]E CAKES 190-180-999-5301
13660 02/10/96 000277 S & S ARTS AND CRAFTS FREIGHT 190-180-999-5301
31.~
7.95
20.99
?.3.89
19.~
10.69
~.~
33.50
211 .~5
136~1 02/10/96 00027g SAYRE, RiCK
REI!I/SHERIFF'S ABARD D GOl-100-gs~-5260
64.00
64.00
13662 02/10/9/+ 000307 TENECULA TROPHY CO. PLACQUE FOR CITY NANAGE 001-2170
67.12
13663 02/10/94 000308 TEMECULA TOgN AS$OCIAT] RENT 2/9~-SET UP & CLEA 081-100-999-5236
576.00
576.00
13666 02/10/96 0003Z5 UNITED gAY OF THE INLAN QQQ3Z5 UU 081-2120
13666 02/10/96 000325 UNITED ttAY OF THE INLAN 000325 Ug 108-2120
1366~ 02/10/96 000325 UNITED gAY OF THE INLAN 008325 UV lg0-2120
83.25
2.25
17.00
102.50
13665 02/10/94/, 000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE 2 SETS OF UNIFORMS CLEA 100-164-999-5263
13665 02/10/96 080326 UNZTOG RENTAL SERVICE M TAGS 108-164-~-52/+3
13665 02/10/W, 000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE 6 SETS OF UNIFORIIS 100-164-~-5263
13665/.02/10/94 000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE NAT RENTALS 3~0-199-999-5250
13(x J2/10/94 000332 VAND~PE CHOU AS$OCIATi PLAN CHECKS JANUARY 96 001-162-~-5268
30.00
1.~
25.~
~.50
528
~0.23
528.65
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TENECULA
02/10/9~ 14:16 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIOOS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NUMBER DATE i M DESCRIPTION lilJBER
]TEN
cHECK
13667 02/10/~ 0003~8 ZIGLER, GAIL REFHESHIENTS C~O 190-180-9;9-5260
30.00
30.00
13668 02/10/94 000370 BIRDGALL, PATRICIA REIN LEAGUE OF CA CITIE 001-100-~;~-5258
3&.20
13669 02/10/94 000389 USCII/PEBSCO, (ONEA) 000389 PT RETIR 001'2160
1)&&~ 02/10/94 00038~ USCI4/PEBSCO, (ONEA) 000~ PT RETIR 100-2160
1:3669 02/10/94 000389 USCN/PEBSCO, (OBRA) 000389 PT RETZR 190'2160
97.80
87.00
121.70
306.50
13670 02/10/f4 000395 ECONOMIC DEVELOPtENT CO BOOTH FEE AT TRERDS 200 280-199-~9-52~
575.00
575.00
13671 02/10/~ 00040~
13671 02/10/~ 000~0~
13671 02/10/W~ O00&O~
13671 02/10/9/* O00&O~
13671 02/10/~ 000~0~
13671 02/10/~ 00040~
VALLEH SAFETY SUPPLY
VALLEN SAFETY StJPPLY
VALLEN SAFETY SI. FPLY
VALLEN SAFETY SUPPLY
VALLEN SAFETY SUPPLY
VALLEN SAFETY SUPPLY
ADAPTER AV2000 100-164-~-5218
XL 16832&0 COVEEALLS VI 100-164-999-5218
)(XL 16832/*0 COVEPALLS V 100-1~4-999-5218
)O0(L 16832/*0 COVERALLS 100-1~4-f99-5218
FREIGHT 100-1~4-999-5218
TAX 100-164-999-5218
25.2~
45.00
45.00
5.23
10.24
172.76
13672 02/10/94 000~28 HORIZON VATER VATER CHARGE 190-182-999-5240
76.15
76.15
13673 02/10/W, OOGG81 GEOTECHNZCAL & ENVIRONM PRO GEOTECHNZCAL INVEST 280-199-805-5802
13&7/* 02/10/94 0004~ CALIFORNIA ASSOC. FOR L CALED ANNUAL IENBERSHIP 001-110-;-5226
780.00
55.00
13675 02/10/W, 000580 PHOTO gORKS DEV/PR]NTS/SLIDES 100-180-999-5301
18.(Y,
18.0/,
1:5676 02/10/9/* O005W} LEAGUE OF CA CITZESILAF REGISTRATION/Pg OFFICE 001-103-~-5261
510.00
510.00
13677 02/10/94 0006~3 FORTNER HARDgARE
NISC. SUPPLIES AND EQU! 100-180-FF)-5212
70.72
70.72
13678 02/10/~, 000645 SMART &F]NAL
OPEN P.O. FOR RECREATIO 100-180-~-5301
64.T1
13679 02/10/W, 000~53 LUCKY STORE
COOKIE NOMSTER CLASS SU lf0-183-~-5320
50.00
50.00
13680 02/10/94 000680 AHS-TNS RECHARGE POSTAGE ACCCXJN 001-100-;-5230
13080 02/10/W, 000080 AHS-TNS RECHARGE POSTAGE ACCOUN 001-110-~-5230
13680 02/10/94 000680 AHS-TMS RECHARGE POSTAGE ACCOUN 001-120-999-5230
13680 02/10/W, 000680 AHS-THS RECHARGE POSTAGE ACC(XJN 001-1/*0-~-5230
13680 02/10/94 000680 AHS-THS RECHARGE POSTAGE ACCOUN 001-150-999-5230
13680 02/10/94 000680 AHS-TNS RECHARGE POSTAGE ACCOUN 001-161-999-5230
13680 02/10/94 000680 ANS-TN$ RECHARGE POSTAGE ACCOUN 001-1~0
13680 02/10/94 000680 AHS-TMS RECHARGE POSTAGE ACCOUN 001-163-999-5230
13680 02/10/94 000680 N4S-TMS RECHARGE POSTAGE ACCOUN 1fO-180-~qg-5230
13680 02/10/94 001)680 ANS-TMS RECHARGE POSTAGE ACCOUN 320-199-999-5230
13681 02/10/~4 00070~ SKS, INC./INLAND OIL FUEL 1gO-180-;-52&3
13681 02/10/W, 00070& SKS, ]NC./INLARD OIL FUEL 001-162-~-52d3
13681 02/10/W, 00070/, SKS, ]NC./INLANO OIL FUEL 100-164-~Jg-52d3
13681 02/10/~/, 00070/, SKS, INC./INLAND OIL FUEL 1~0-180-~-52d3
13681 02/10/W, O0070& SKS, INC./INLAND OIL IqJ~L 001-162-;-5;7.~3
1)681 02/10/W, O0070& SKS, INC./INLAND OIL FUEL 100-164-;-5263
13681 02/10/W, 000704 SKS, INC./INLAND OIL FUEL 001-110-ffg-52d3
2.61
25.00
191.14
77/,
132
218.67
54.62
110.19
176.60
6.49
41.72
324.~
78.83
59.B
3~.~
23.80
1,69Z.59
VOU(7/"' C%TY OF TE14ECULA
02/1, 14:16 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITE14 ACCOUNT
NUHBER DATE NUI4BER MANE DESCRIPTION NU146ER
ITEH
N4OLRIT
CHE~
AJ4OtJNT
13682 02/10/9~ 000712 FORD, STEVEN J. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES C 250-190-129-581X
13682 02/10/9/, 000712 FORD, STEVEN J. DEC 93 CRC PROJECT CO-O 250-190-129-5804
13683 02/10/9~ 000?28 RARSEY BACKFLOM & PLLNB BACKFLOM PREVENTION DEY 190-180-999-5250
13683 02/10/94 000?28 RANSEY BACKFLOU & PLLNB BACKFLOIJ PREVENTIOR DEV 193-180-999-5415
13683 02/10/9~ 000?28 RAHSEY BACKFLW & PLIJII BACKFLOg PREVENTION DEV 190-180-999-5250
13684 02/10/9~ 00075~ ELLZOTT GROUP, THE PLAN CHECK SERVICES 193-180-999-5250
3,200.00
2,560.00
92.00
400.02
199.98
5,760.00
692.00
900.00
13685 02/10/94 000837 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TA 000837 FRAIl TAX 001-2140
13685 02/10/94 000837 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TA 000837 FIL4N TAX 100-2140
93.49
93.50
186,99
13686 02/10/94 000881 OAKRIDGE LANDSCAPE/]RR] ADD'L UORK/NOg]NG & TRE 210-190-134-580~
13686 02/10/94 000881 OAKRIDGE LANDSCAPEIIRRI LANDSCAPE & 90 DAY RAIN 100-16~-999-5401
473.00
297.00
770.00
13687 02/10/94 000927 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE SOIL TECH 11/02
250-190-129-5804
64.00
13688 02/10/94 0009/,6 DISCOUNT FEED & TACK IMS CHUCK 4IN FOOl) 6OI-170-999-5327
53.85
53.85
13689 02/10/94 000993 FREEDO~ COFFEE, INC.
13f*""02/10/94 000~3 FREEDOM COFFEE, INC.
COFFEE SERVICE FOR CITY 3&0-199-999-5250
COFFEE SERVICE FOR CITY 340-199-999-5250
156.39
.25-
156.14
13690 02/10/94 001002 FIRST INTERSTATE BANK - 5~03910032 NJII JA 001-140-999-5258
13690 02/10/94 001002 FIRST INTERSTATE BANK - 5473666403910940 PB JAN 001-100-999-5258
13690 0Z/10/94 001002 FIRST INTERSTATE BANK - 54z73,~f,~03910073 RP JAN 001-100-999-5258
1369O 02/10/94 001002 FIRST INTERSTATE BANK - 54'7'4~03910081 JAN RR 001-100-999-5258
1369O 02/10/94 001002 FIRST INTERSTATE BANK - 5473,~%03910164 NOV SM 001-100-999-5258
307.94
99.75
140.08
38O.67
108J0-
818.6~
13691 02/10/94 001028 MEYER, CHUCK
CABLE INSTALLATION (CRC 250-190-129-5804
800.00
800.00
13692 02/10/94 001065 USON/PEBSCO (DEF. COle>. 001065 DEF CONP 001-2080
13692 02/10/94 001065 USC3q/PEBSCO (DEF. C014P. 001065 DEF COI~ 100-2080
13692 02/10/94 001065 USC3q/PEBSCO (DEF. COMP. 001'065 DEF CDMP 190-2080
13692 02/10/94 001065 USCN/PEBSCO (DEF. CONP. 001065 DEF CONP 300-2080
13692 02/10/94 001065 USC14/PEBSCO (DEF. CONP. 001065 DEF C014P 320-2080
13693 02/10/94 001096 BOLAR, HIRSCH & JENNING 14ISC RESEARCH
001-140-999-5248
3,04.0.30
197.98
156.32
3.46
312.50
100.00
3,710.56
160.00
13694 02/10/94 001142 RARKHAN & ASSOCIATES ENGINEERING SERVICES AS 190-180-999-5250
13694 02/10/94 OO1142 HARKHAM & ASSOCIATES ENGINEERING SERVICES AS 190-180-9O9-5250
13694 02/10/94 001142 lIARKHAN & ASSOCIATES ENGINEERING SERVICES AS 190-180-999-5250
&6.00
87.60
125.00
2/8.6O
13695 02/10/94 001152 14 & P UNDERGROUND, INC. UNDERGROUND UTILITY JOl 250-190-129-580~
135.50
135.50
13696 02/10/94 001193 CONP USA, INC. 262691 FUTURE DON/kIN SC 001-170-999-5221
13696 02/10/9~ 001193 CORP USA, INC. FREIGHT 001-170-999-5221
13696 02/10/94 001193 CONP USA, INc. TAX 001-170-999-5221
102.~
5.00
7.~
115.75
1:3697/._02/10/94 001212 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS 12127-1/26 190-181-999-5240
1367 J2/10/94 001240 OLD TINN TE14ECOLA NERCH ROD RUN '94 SPONSORSHIP a!0-199-999-5264
130.9o
5,000.00
130
5,000.00
VOUCHREZ
02/10/94
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NtJNBER
13700
13701
13701
13701
13701
13701
13702
13703
1370~
1370~
13705
13706
14:16
CHECK
DATE
02/10/94
02/10/94
02/10/94
02/10/94
02/I0/W,
02/1
02/10/~4
02/10/96
02/10/9~.
02/10/94
02/10/94
02/1
02/10/94
VENOOR
I.IBER
001270
001279
001280
001280
001280
001280
001280
001302
001303
001304
001304
001305
001307
VENDOR
leAHE
G.R. GLEDSON CONSTRUCTI
RANCHO NEMS
PETROLARE - REPAIRS
PETROLARE - REPAIRS
PETROLARE - REPAIRS
PETROLARE - REPAIRS
PETROLARE - REPAIRS
SENATE RULES CORNITTEE
ANERZCA'S FINEST D]XIEL
INDIO, CITY OF
INDIO, CITY OF
PUBLIC RETIREHENT JOURN
F[ELDINGS
CITY OF TENEClJLA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITBI
DESCRIPTION
INSTALL SLIDE SECTION P
DISPLAY AD FOR COIII. N]T
FUEL/B&S
FUEL/B&S
SERVICE FOR PROPANE VEH
VEHICLE REPAIR
SERVICE FOR PROPANE VEH
SPECIAL DISTRICT RIL]C
HENBERSHIP DUES
HAYORS & COUNCILS COlIF
CITY NANAGER
ACCOUNT
NLNBER
190-180-9~-5212
001-100-999-5254
001-162-999-5263
001-162-999-5263
310-162-999-5214
310-162-999-5214
310-162-999-5214
001-163-999-5228
190-180-999-5226
001 - 100-999-5258
001-110-9~-5258
RETIRElENT TRAINING SEN' 001-140-~-5258
6V BATTERIES 100-164-~-5218
TOTAL CHECKS
ITEN
NIOUNT
100.00
125.00
9,8~
6.59
288.67
124.15
247.60
4.31
10,00
26.00
13.00
270.00
52.17
~ 6
CHECK
ANOUNT
100,00
125.00
676.90
4.31
10.00
39.00
270.00
85,061.13
02/1
15:14
CITY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAG~
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
100 GAS TAX FUND
190 COleUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
19) TC$1) SERVICE LEVEL C
210 CAPITAL INPROVENENT PROJ FUND
250 CAPITAL PROJECTS - TCSD
280 REDEVELOPNENT AGENCY - CIP
TOTAL
mT
23,668.81
~6,355.82
30,590.98
475.00
24,418.38
567,279.03
196,925.00
3,23~.30
8~2,W~7.32
VOUCHRE2
02/10/9/,
15:14
CITY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUNBER
CHECK
DATE
VENDOR
NUHBER
NANE
ITEN
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT
NUI4BER
ITEN
AI4OUNT
CHECK
N4OUNT
13710
13711
13711
13711
13711
13711
13712
13712
13712
13712
13712
13712
13713
13714
13716
13714
13716
02/22/96
02/22/94
02/22/9/,
02/22/94
02/22/~4
02/22/94
02/22/94
02/22/94
02/22/~4
02/22/96
02/22/96
02/22/94
02/22/94/,
02/22/96
02/22/94
02/22/94
02/22/~4
000123
000126
000126
000126
000126
000126
000135
000135
000135
000135
000135
000135
000230
000238
000238
000238
000238
BURKE MILLIAHS & SOltENS
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE HA
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE HA
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE HA
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE HA
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE HA
CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER
CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER
CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER
CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER
CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER
CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER
NUNI FINANCIAL SERVICES
FINAL TOUCH HARKETING
FINAL TOUCH HARKETING
FINAL TOUCH NARKETING
FINAL TOUCH HARKET]NG
DEC RETAINER SERVICES
IONTHLY LDSP NAINTENANC
LANDSCAPE NAINTENANCE
NEDIANS SERVICE AREA
KENT HINTERGARDT PARK
[RRIGATIOR REPAIRS ' RI
TYPE I BARRICADES
TAX
BIKE LANE ll)RD/SYH
NISC. HARDHARE FOR SIGN
NISC. HARDMARE FOR SIGN
SIGN & HARDHAND
ASSESSIlENT ADHINISTRATI
COORDINATION TABLOID DE
PRODUCTIGN/AD FILH
EDITORIAL SUPPORT
TAX
001-130-999-5246
1~0-180-999-5250
190-180-W9-5250
191-180-999-5415
190-180-999-5250
190-180-999-5212
190-180-999-5212
190-180-9~-5212
100-164-999-52z~
100-1~4-~-5244
100-164-999-52~4
190-180-999-5370
280-1~-~-5264
280-199-~-5264
280-199-999-5264
280-199-~-5264
3,150.00
4,068.66
175.00
675.00
3,326.31
417.76
456.00
35.34
113.78
534.96
20.69
306.01
1,574.74
~50.00
120.00
2,000.00
164.30
3,150.00
8,442.73
1,466.76
1,574.76
3 "~30
13715
13715
13715
13715
13715
13715
13715
13716
13716
13716
13717
13717
1)718
13719
13719
13719
137Z0
137~0
13720
137Z1
137~1
02/22/94
02/22/96
02122196
02/22/96
02/22/96
02/22/96
02/22/96
02/22/96
02/22/9~
02/22/94
02/22/94
02/22/94
02/22/96
02/22/96
02/22/94
02/22/94
02/22/96
02/22/96
02/22/94
02/22/94
02/22/94
000260
000260
000240
000260
000260
000260
000260
000539
000539
000539
000678
000678
000712
000864
0008~
000864
000929
000929
000929
001013
001013
ORANGE COUNTY STRIPING
ORANGE COUNTY STRIPING
ORANGE COUNTY STRIPING
ORANGE COUNTY STRIPING
ORANGE COUNTY STRIPING
ORANGE COUNTY STRIPING
ORANGE COUNTY STRIPING
WII4HER YN4ADA ASSOCIATE
WINHER YA!4ADA ASSOCIATE
WINNER YANADA ASSOCIATE
RIVERSIDE COUNTY HEALTH
RIVERSIDE COUNTY HEALTH
FORD, STEVEN J.
CORONA CLAY CO.
CORONA CLAY CO.
CORONA CLAY CO.
T.B. PENICK & SONS, INC
T.B. PENICK & SONS, INC
T.B. PENICK & SONS, INC
HINDERLITER deLANAS & A
HINDERLITER deLANAS & A
AREA'S 2, 3 AND 4
RESTRIPING & STENCILING
STRIPING WORK
RESTRIPE CITY WIDE REPA
2ND COAT RANCHO CAL ND.
NEW "25" N.P.H. LEGENDS
RESTRIPING & STENCIL CR
PALA ND PARK LDSP SERVI
PROFESSIONAL SER. IO/1-
NOV 9) PALA ND PARK
ANIHAL CONTROL
ANINAL CONTROL
CO-ORD SERVICES JAN 94
'ANGEL NIX' BRICKDUST
'HOUND NIX' CLAY HATER/
TAX
CRC/SPORTS PARK CONSTRU
CHANGE ORDER 5 CONPLETI
RETENTION
CONTRACT SERVICES FOR C
CONTRACT X PANfiT FOR
100-166-ggg-5410
100-164-999-5410
100-164-999-5410
100-164-~-5410
100-164-~99-5410
100-164-999-5410
100-164-999-5410
210-1~0-120-5802
210-190-120-5802
210-190-120-5802
001-172-~-5255
001-172-~-5255
250-190-129-580~
190-180-99f-5212
190-180-999-5212
1f0-180-99~-5212
250-190-129-580~
250-190-129-5804
250-2035
001-140-99~-52~8
001-140-~-52~8
1,566.50
10,000.00
5,900.00
9,364.19
2,500.00
32.00
7,000.00
1,545.00
2,088.44
61.59
5,151.80
4,963.61
6,020.00
2,250.00
1,500.00
290.e3
208,765.00
3,351.71
21,211.71'
900. O0
9,523.40
36,362.69
3,695.03
10,095.41
6,020.00
4,060.63
190,905.00
10,~40
13722 02/22/94 001014 COUNTRY SIGNS & DESIGNS CONSTRUCT]ON OF PRE-CAS 190-180-999-5244 3,537.60
02/~
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
13722
13722
13723
13723
13723
13723
13723
13723
13723
13723
13723
13723
13723
13723
1372~
13725
13725
1~_
CHECK
DATE
02/22/~
02/22/W.
02/22/94
02/22/94
02/22/94
02/22/94
02/22/W.
02/22/94
02/22/94
02/22/94
02/22/94
02/2Z/~4
02/22/~4
02/22/94
02/22/94
02/22/9~
02/22/W~
VENDOR
NUMBER
001014
001014
001056
001056
001056
001056
001056
001056
001056
001056
001056
001056
001056
001056
001072
001270
001270
00128~
NAME
COlJIITRY SIGNS & DESIGNS
COUNTRY SIGNS & DESIGNS
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
BANK OF MERICA NT & SA
CITY WIDE ELECTRONIC SY
CITY W[DE ELECTRORIC SY
AAA PAVING COMPANY
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PER]CI)S
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
CONSTRUCTION OF FOUNDAT
TAX
JANUARY LDSP NAINTENANC
DEC SLOPE A
SLOPE A JAN NAINT
DEC BR]DLEVALE/VIRANDA
BRIDLEVALE/V]RANDA LDSP
PROVIDE ALL LABOR All) M
LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENT
TURF RENOVATION
3 SOIL ~LES
1 RECOIIqENDATIGN
I.,AliDSCAPE MAINTENANCE
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE
CONST FUND ACCT 1173839
VAN]OUS ELECTRONIC ]NST
TAX
STREET IMPROVEMENTS
ACCOUNT
Ht,I, IEER
1~0-180-~-52~,
1~0-180-~-52~
lf$-180-~)~-5415
1~-180-~-5415
1~-180-9~-5415
19~J-180-f~-5415
1~J-180-~-5415
19r5-180-9~-5415
1~0-180-~-5212
190-180-~-5212
1~0-180-~-5212
1~O-180-~-5212
195-180-9~-5415
193-180-~-5415
1~-181-~;)-5212
1~0-181 -~q~-5212
100-166,-~-5402
ITEM
AMOUNT
2,667.50
206.7~
11,302.24
4,295.00
4,295.00
405.97
405.97
1,314.20
7,020.00
300.00
135.00
40.00
1,500.00
900.00
563,584.00
2,422.00
187.71
9,017.71
PAGE 2
CHECK
N,~:XmT
6,611.83
31,913.38
563,58~.00
2,60~.71
9,017.71
TOTAL CHECKS
892,~7.32
ITEM NO.
4
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAl
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
February 22, 1994
'No Paring' Zone on Avenida Barca from Humbar Drive to Via
Monterey
PREPARED BY: Martin C. Lauber, Traffic Engineer ~'/~'~'
RECOMMENDATION:
The Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution
entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 94-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ESTABLISHING 'NO PARKING' ZONE ON AVENIDA
BARCA FROM HUMBER DRIVE TO RANCHO VIA MONTEREY.
BACKGROUND:
The Traffic Division of the City of Temecula Public Works Department has received a request
to restrict paring on Avenida Barca, between Mergerits Road and Vie Monterey, from 2:00
p.m. to 3:00 p.m. Monday through Friday. The citizens concerns focussed on public safety
regarding driver and pedestrian movements associated with school operations. At the
Public/Traffic Safety Commission a petition with 34 signatures was submitted supporting the
request.
Traffic signal plans are currently being reviewed by Caitrans for the intersection of Avenida
Barca and Margarita Road. For optimum traffic signal operations, left turn pockets will be
added to both approaches to Margarita Road on Avenida Barca.
Due to available roadway widths, parking must be restricted from Humbar Drive to Via
Monterey along both sides of Avenida Barca. Those vehicles displaced by the restriction will
be able to stage on Margarita Road adjacent to Avenida Barca for student loading and
unloading. These locations' will provide students with the opportunity to cross with the
crossing guards at the intersection. Once signalized, students can utilize the pedestrian
indications included with all new traffic signals.
-1 - p~rpt~94~O222~beroe.hdr
Existing vehicular and pedestrian traffic on Avenida Barca was observed during school peaks.
Staff observed illegal U-turns, blocked driveways, double parking and dangerous backing
maneuvers north of Margarita Road. We also noted pedestrians crossing midblock on Avenida
Barca between parked vehicles increasing the potential for accidents.
Due to existing traffic patterns and the future construction of a new traffic signal, staff
recommends establishing a "No Parking" zone on Avenida Barca from Humbar Drive to Via
Monterey.
FISCAL IMPACT:
FY93-94:
Funds are available in the Department of Public Works
Striping/Stenciling - Account No. 100-164-999-5410 and
Signs - Account No. 100-164-999-5244.
Red Curb - 300 L.F. at e.58/LF =
No Parking Signs - 6 at ~125.00 =
Total
$174.00
8750.00
$924.00
Attachments:
Resolution No. 94-
Exhibit "A" Proposed Parking Restriction
-2- pwO~agd~V)222%Jxme.hdr
RESOLUTION NO. 94-
A RESOLUTION OF ~ CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY
OF TEMECUIA ESTAm.BRING *NO PARIcING, ZONE
ON AVENIDA BARCA FROM HUMBER DRIVE TO VIA
MONTEREY
The City Council of the City of Temeeula doe~ r~,~olve, determine and order as follows:
Section 1. Pursuant to Seaion 10.16.160, of the Temecula Municipal Code~ "No
Parking" zone is hereby established in the City of Temecula on both sides of Avertida Barca
from Humber Drive to V'm MortteaW as shown on Exhibit *A *.
Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVEB AND ADOPTED, by the CAW Council of the City of Temecula
at a regular meeting held on the 22nd day of February, 1994.
June S. Greek, City Clerk
4- pwOb'~agdf1M%94~O222%beroa.hdr
0
,I i ..,I T I I
v::)l:lvla
I I I I · i"1L I I I1~
VQINqAV
W
.y
0
ITEM 5
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
/~Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
February 22, 1994
All Way Stop, Rancho Vista Road at Meadows Parkway
PREPARED BY:
Martin C. Lauber, Traffic Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
The Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution
entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 94-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ESTABLISHING 'STOP SIGNS'
BACKGROUND:
Staff had been asked to analyze the possibility of adding two (2) stop signs on Rancho Vista
Road at Meadows Parkway which would make it an all-way stop.
The California Department of Transportation Traffic Manual identifies criteria along with three
(3) specific warrants for the consideration of multi-way stops. Although these three (3)
warrants are not met, other factors that may be considered include, sight distance, local travel
patterns and any other site specific impacts.
A field review revealed that southbound vehicles on Meadows Parkway, have substandard
visibility of vehicles approaching from the east on Rancho Vista Road. This limitation also
exists for pedestrians crossing-on their way to and from school. Existing traffic volumes
entering on Pauba Road and Meadows Parkway are nearly balanced with a 48%-52% split.
Considering the discussion at the Commission regarding the effect of limited visibility, driver
behavior and the near balance of vehicles entering the intersection, staff supports the
Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommendation for two (2) additional stop signs for Rancho
Vista Road at Meadows Parkway.
r:~agdrpt~g4~O222~adlwey. ftplejp
FISCAL IMPACT:
Two (2) stop ahead signs, st ~125.00 = $250.00
Two {2) stop signs, at ~ 125.00 each = $250.00
Eight (6) legends at $24.00 = ~144.00
Limit line - 64 L.F. at $0.45 = $28.80
Four (4) all-way signs, at $5.00 = ~20.00
TOTAL $692.80
FY 93-94:
Funds are available in the Department of Public Works
Signs - Acct No. 100-164-999-5244.
NOTE:
All work to be done by City Maintenance Crews except pavement markings
which are awaiting new stencil truck.
Attachment:
Resolution No. 94-
r:~gdrpt~94%0222~llwmy.eq}iejp
RF.,~LUTION NO. 94-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA ESTARL/~!/NG "STOP" S/GNS
The City Council of the City of Temm~ does resolve, determine and order as follows:
Section 1. Pursuant to Section 10.12.100 of the Municipal Code, the fortowing
'STOP' sign locations are hereby established in the City of Te~.
Section 2.
~solution.
Westbound Rancho Vista Road @ Meadows Parkway
Fastbound Rancho Vista Road @ Meadows Parkway
The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this
PASSED, APPROV~ AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula
at a regular meeting held on the 22nd day of February, 1994.
Ron Roberrs, Mayor
ATTEST:
June S. Greek
City Clerk
[SEAL)
r:,~gdrpt'~4~O22..2~llw~/,ml~p
ITEM NO. 6
~PPROV~T.
INANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
City Manager/City Council
FROM:
MaW Jane McLarney, Finance Officer
DATE:
February 22, 1994
SUBJECT:
Review and Approval of the Fiscal Year 1993-94 Mid-Year Budget
PREPARED BY: Luci Romero, Financial Services Administrator
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO 94-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 1993-94 ANNUAL
OPERATING BUDGET
DISCUSSION: Each year the City conducts a mid-year review of its fiscal year operating
budget. The purpose of this review is to conduct an analysis of revenues and expenditures
to ensure that the City maintains a prudent and healthy fiscal position. The Finance
Department staff has performed an analysis of revenues. Additionally, all City departments
have reviewed their operating budgets and the have submitted year-end expenditure
projections. The mid-year review includes the General Fund, Gas Tax Fund and Internal
Service Funds.
Activity in each of the funds is presented in accordance with the following schedules:
Schedule A - Budget Summary: Illustrates Fund Balance activity in terms of both the
currently adopted budget and the recommended mid-year amended budget. Schedule
A presents the beginning fund balance, revenues, expenditures and transfers, and the
projected fund balance based upon this activity.
Schedule B - Revenue Detail: Illustrates the revenue detail by fund source in terms of
current projections, year-to-date received at 12/31/93, and mid-year revised
projections.
Schedule C - Expenditure Summary: Illustrates summaries of expenditures by each
department within the fund. The expenditure categories are Personnel Services,
Operating Expenditures, and Capital Outlay. A discussion of the significant changes.
within each fund is presented below.
Gmu;RAI FUND
General Fund Schedule A, Budget Summary, illustrates a July 1,1993, beginning fund balance
of 88,686,042. The mid-year adjusted June 30, 1994, ending fund balance represents an
increase of $332,319.
General Fund Schedule B, Revenue Detail, illustrates that current projected revenue is
$12,930,146. The amended year-end revenue projection is $11,743,122, a decrease of
$1,187,024, or approximately 9%.
Significant decreases in revenues are as follows:
Structural Fire Tax: Although the revenue projection has been decreased $1,373, 179,
it should be noted, that this is due to a revised method of accounting for Fire Services
revenues and expenditures. Thus, a corresponding decrease will be reflected in the
Fire Services expenditures, resulting in no net change to the General Fund.
Iicenses. Permits. end Services Cheroes: Projected Engineering revenues have been
decreased $300,000 to reflect that revenue anticipated from some larger development
projects will not be received. Fire Plan Check/Inspection Fees have also been
decreased $15,000 in accordance with year-to-date revenue received.
Projected increases in revenues are as follows:
Prooertv Tax: The projection has been revised to reflect the Teeter Plan remittance.
The Teeter Plan distribution schedule specifies that 85.5% of the property tax revenue
will be remitted to the City during the current fiscal year. Additionally, the City will
receive a one-time Teeter Plan distribution for prior year delinquent taxes. The revised
year-end Property Tax revenue projection results in an increase of $176,423.
Sales Tax: Based upon the revised year-end analysis, this revenue projection has been
increased $68,000.
General Fund Schedule C, Expenditure Summary, illustrates that General Fund expenditures
have been decreased $1,519,343, or approximately 12%.
Significant reductions in expenditures are as follows:
Fire Services Deoartment: As indicated previously in the discussion of revenue
decrease, expenditures have been reduced to reflect the Fire Services contract net
billing of the Structural Fire Tax credit.
Salarv Savinas From Untilled Personnel Positions: The Planning Department has salary
savings from an unfilled Planning Technician. The Engineering Department has savings
from untilled Associate Engineer and Engineering Technician positions.
Sales Tax Reimbursement: The Costco sales tax reimbursement of $110,000 has
been moved to the Redevelopment Agency budget, in accordance with the
reimbursement agreement.
2
Significant increases in expenditures are as follows:
City Attornev neoartment: Reflects an increase of 887,000 due to unenticipated
litigation; i.e., WaI-Mart, McDowell.
Buildino & Safety Department: Reflects an overall increase of ~29,186 due to
personnel related expenditures. Based upon an increase in building permit activity, the
Building & Safety Department has requested to fund · previously untilled Building
Technician position. Additionally, appropriations have been included for pert-time end
contract code enforcement and inspection services.
GAS TAX FUND
Gas Tax Fund Schedule A illustrates that s nominal fund balance will be reflected at June 30,
1994. However, it should be noted that the transfers from the General end Local
Transportation Funds will be adjusted at year-end to reflect year-end actuals in expenditures.
The result will be a zero fund balance.
Gas Tax Fund Schedule B illustrates mid-year revised revenues of e576,899. This e9,541
increase is due to an increase in the investment interest end reimbursements projections.
Gas Tax Fund Schedule C illustrates year-end expenditures of $2,041,382, · decrease of
$15,770. Expenditure reductions ere primarily attributable to an untilled Public Works
Inspector position.
INTERNAL SFRVICE FUNDS
The Internal Service Funds are utilized to finance and account for activities involved in
rendering services to departments within the City. The Insurance Fund is used to finance and
account for the City's risk management and insurance programs. The Vehicles Fund is used
for the operation, maintenance and timely replacement of City vehicles. The Information
Systems Fund is used to account for the cost of providing electronic data processing
equipment and software and central telephone services.
The Copy Center Fund is used to account for the cost of providing central mailing and
reprographic services. The Facilities Fund is used to account for the cost of providing facility
maintenance and operations.
Increases in expenditures ere reflected in the Vehicles, Copy Center and Facilities Funds. The
Vehicles Fund increase is due to higher than anticipated maintenance costs in the City
Manager's Department. The Copy Center Fund increase results from unanticipeted costs for
maintenance agreements. The Facilities Fund increase is due to increased costs for City Hall
maintenance. Although these increases result in higher service charges to City departments,
the increases do not significantly impact the departments.
SPt:CIAL RL=VENUI: FUNDS & CAPITAL PROJI:CT FUND
Exhibit I Special Revenue Funds and Exhibit II Capital Projects Fund are presented to illustrated
mid-year activity within each of the funds.
3
AUTHORIZFD POSITIONS
Exhibit III illustrates the City-wide allocation of personal. The total number of authorized
positions remains unchanged. Currently, there are 101.0 authorized positions.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The mid-year adjusted budget projections result in an increase in the year-end fund balance
of $332,319.
Attachments: Resolution
General Fund Schedules A through C
Gas Tax Fund Schedules A through C
Internal Services Funds Schedules A through C
Exhibit I Special Revenue Funds:
- Reimbursement District Fund
- Development Impact Fund
- Community Development Block Grant Fund
- Measure "A" Fund
- Local Transportation Fund
Exhibit II Capital Projects Fund
Exhibit III - Personnel Allocation By Department (City-wide)
4
RESOLUTION NO. 94-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY
OF TEIVlECULA AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 1993-94
ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET
WHKU~AS, each year a mid-year ~ is conducted of City operating budgets.
Wlik;REAS, the purpose of this review is to conduct an analysis of revenues and
expenditures to ensure that the City maintains a prudent and healthy fiscal position.
WH~:uR~,S, the mid-year review has been completed and the recommended adjustments
are reflected in Schedules A through C of the City's General Fund; Gas Tax Fund; and Internal
Service Fun&.
The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby resolve as follows:
Section 1. That the Fiscal Year 1993-94 General Fund Annual Operating Budget is
hereby amended in accordance with Schedules A through C.
Section 2. That the Fiscal Year 199394 Gas Tax Fund Annual Operating Budget is
hereby amended in accordance with Schedules A through C.
Seetlon 3. That the Fiscal Year 1993-94 Internal Service Funds Budget is hereby
amended in accordance with Schedules A through C.
Section 4. That all the terms and conditions of Resolution No. 9349, which adop~ the
Fiscal Year 1993-94 budget shall remain the same.
PASS!~, APPROVI~ AND ADOPTED this 22nd day of February, 1994.
ATTEST:
Ron Robeits, Mayor
June S. ~ City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF C.ALr~ORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TI~VIECULA)
I l:tl~l~l~y CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the CiW~
Council of the City of Temecula a~a regular meeting thereof, held on the 22nd day of Febnmry,
1994, by the following vote of the City Council:
COUNCrLMEMBERS:
NOBS:
COUNCrLMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCrL~:
lune S. Greek, City Clerk
Revenue
ExpendINN
Excess of Revenues Over Expenditures
Transfers from (to) Other Funds
Inoreaee (deerNee) in Fund Balenee
Fund Balance. July 1, 1993
Fund Balance, June 80, 1994
12,g~0.146 $
11.731~te~
1.198,783
(1,1 is,me2)
(.t2oe) s
4,3eL828
11.743,122
10~12,020
1.531.102
(1.lee.eel)
331.110
9,017.152
SCHEDULE A
vAeuue~.
FAVI(UNFAV)
S (1.187.Q~4)
332.319
-Property Tax
-Property Tax (Unseeumd)
· Frenehbe Fees
-Sales end Use Tax
-Property Trensfer Tax
-Tmnebnt Oemapeney Tax .
-BtnmNmlFIreTex
-Business Lioenses
-Engineering:
-BuScling
-Planning
-Fire Pin Cheek end InBp.
4nvestment Interest
-Motor Vehicle in Lieu
-Off Road Vehble In Lieu
-Vehicle Code Fines
-AB 2766
-Cepital Improvement Program
-Community Sewices District
-liedevelopment Agenay
-Contributions
-Grants
-Overhead Reimbursement
-Temporary Outdoor Event
-Perking CiteSone
,Rental Income
-Other
TEETER PLAN ONE TIME ADJUST.
824,040
0
680,000
5.800,000
130.000
450,000
1,373.179
275,000
1,061,026
0
54,000
18.000
266~01
213,600
75,000
2O,OOO
o
0
0
0
0
0
Gr.N""V' ~
REVENUE DETAIL
BY FUND 80UFICE
FYgG-e4 FYg~e4
YrD REVISED
12/31/83 PROJECTION
ii&ii&&&ilil&&&&&&&&
293J47
40,71
237284
2,834 ,,132
75,9;1
211,439
0
45,675
131,1H
65,517
27.630
108,191
545,846
357
24,047
0
1,061,026
357
54,(XX)
18,000
213,600
0
12,753
5,010
2,000
0
106,800
0
0
12.753
297
5,010
2,000
66.443
11,743,122
SCHEDULE B
FAVI(UNF'AV)
176423
40,795
0
68,000
0
0
(~,STSJT9)
0
0
0
0
0
('~S.O00)
0
0
0
357
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
12,753
297
5,010
2,000
66,443
(1,187,024)
~., ab-e4
Capital Outlay
Total Dep-b,idt 100
Personnel Services
opemung Expendre..
Capital OutJay
Total Department 110
Personnel Services
Operating Expendhums
Capital Outlay
Personnel Services
Operaling Expenditures
Capital Outlay
Total Department 130
Personnel Services
Operating Expenditures
Capital OuUay
Total I:)cl::-b~mnt 140
Personrml Services
Opm,aUn~ Expenditures
Capital Outlay
Total Departn, mm 150
GENERAL FUND
EXPENDrTURE BUMMARY
BY DEPARTMENT
SCHEDULE C
PAGE 1
BUDGET ~ 12/31/83 APR:IOPRIATION FAV/(UNFAV)
50,e23 35,550 60,561 (938)
234,007 93,914 253,382 (19,375)
0 0 0 0
209,630 129,473 313,043 (20,313)
350,76'/ 164,434 340,674 10,093
120,220 51,637' 100,597 19,623
2.400 0 2,400 0
473,387 216,071 443,671 29,716
0 0 0 0
390.029 lm:),841 402.237 (12,2o6)
0 0 0 0
225,000 187,367 312,c)cx) (8'/',0o0)
0 0 0 0
527,705 229,667 514,135 13,570
300,342 173, 171 315,344 (15,002)
0 0 0 0
828,047 402,838 829,479 (1,4,q2)
63,g15 34,609 76,603 (12.,688)
0 0 0 0
2o9.938 ,e.sse 22o.soe (lo,eeo)
GENERALRND
EXPENDITtJRE SUMMARY
BY DEPARTMENT
SCHEDULE C
PAGE2
F'YI;3-O4 FYm-O4 FYm-O4 FY93-84
CURRENT YTD AMENDED ADjLJ$1MENT
BUDGET {i 12/31/69 APPROPRIATION FAVI(UNFAV)
715, 1 g6 314,214 644, 182 71,004
380,824 163,933 321,822 38,g02
575 0 575 0
1,076,595 478,147 966,889 100,906
0 0 0 0
662,505 277,572 641,122 51,383
207, 106 88, 675 201,148 5,958
11,500 0 11,500 0
911,111 366,~47 853,770 57,341
0 0 0 0
4, 107,471 1,775,879 4, 103,971 3,500
0 0 3,500 (3,500)
4, 107,471 1,775,879 4, 107,471 0
0 0 0 0
1,855,165 62,646 481,986 1,373,179
3,500 0 3,500 0
0 0 0 0
86,000 80,000 86,000 0
0 0 0 0
Operaling ~
Capital Ouliey
Total Department 191)
TOTAL GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURE
PUBLIC WORKS
OPERATING TRANSFER OUT
QENEFIALFUI~
EXPENDITURE BUMMARY
BY DEPARTMENT
SCHEDULE C
PAGE 3
BUDGET O 12/31/93 APPROPRIATION FAV/(UNFAV)
0 0 0 0
450,000 0 340,000 110,000
94,955 19,gt g4,gS5 0
544,955 19,855 434,955 110,000
11.731,363 4,368,328 10,21 2,020 1,51 9,343
1 ,lgg,ggl2 58'/,496 1 ,lie, ill2 0
12,g81,355 4,g55,824 11,412,012 1,518,343
SCHEDULE A
Revenue
ExpendiNree
Exoeu of Revenue Over ExpelxSbxe
Tranefere from (to) Other Funds
Inereue (deereue) in Fund Balance
Fund Balene, July 1, 1993
Fund Balance. June 30, 1994
BUDGET
FYg3-N
AMENDED
BUDGET
FAVI(UNFAV)
$ 567358 I 324.649 $ 576,899 $ 9,541
25.311
(24.802) S 18.446 509 25,311
S 509 S 25.311
-investment Interest
· .G~s Tax 2106
..Gas Tax 2105
..Gas Tax 2107
-(3~s Tax 2107.5
-Fleimbursemen13
T rarmfer from
General FundA..TF
QA8 TAX FUND
REVENUE DETNL
BY FUND SOURCE
SCHEDULE B
12/31/83 PROJECTION FAVI(UNF.AV)
0 4,105 4,496 4,496
0 74,822 136,166 136,186
0 g;,302 158,860 158,860
0 6,000 5,674 5,674
0 5,045 5,045 5,045
324,649 576,890 9,541
1,177.145 2,041,891 9,541
o=p~ ou~y
Total Department 164
QASTAXR. JND
EXPENDITURE BUMMARY
BY DEPARTMENT
BUDi3ET ~ 12/31/g3 APPROPRIATION FAVI(UNFAV)
*,,~,etttt.e~,t,tt, ttt. ere ****tt. ee, H,eea~a~,.~el~e,e ,-.et,teee, lee,ee,.ie,,.e~e e,,.e,e,e,e~e, ee, eee, e, eelee, e
800,551 358,464 776,281 24,270
1,1 94,877 739,137 1,203,377 (8,500)
61,724 61,0g6 61,724 0
2,057'.152 1,158,6ti 2,041,382 15,770
8CI-IEDt,I.E A
Increase (decrease) in Retained Earnings
Retained Earnings. July 1. 1993
Retained E,,ming~. June 30. 1994
1g~,117 $ 104,809
19~.~63 146,862
(836) $
(las.~4e)
(le,oes)
FYg344
AMENDED
BUDGET
198,176
19e,176
(185,24~)
VARIANCE
FAV/(tJNFAV)
$ (N1)
1,777
836
$ 836
VEHICLE8
INTERNAL SERVICE FUND
BUDGET BUMMARY
8C:t,,IEDI, R~A
Revenue
Increase (demise) in Petalned Earnings
Retained Earnings, July 1, 1993
Petalned Earnings, June 30, 1994
I:Ygs-e4 FYgS-94 FYgG. N I:Yga. N
CURRENT Y'rD AMENDED VARL~NCE
BUDGET ~ 12/31/g~ BUDGET FAVI(UNFAV)
loe.~61 $ 56.158
$ 110,461 $ 800
10~,561 48.966 110.461
7,170
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
INTEFINAL 8EFMCE FUND
BUDGET 8UMMArlY
8CHEDULEA
Revenue
Expensel
Increase (decmile) in Retained Elmings
Retained Earnings, July 1, lg93
Retained Esrnings, June 30. 1~4
F'YgO-04 I:Y93-04 FY93-94 FY9344
CURRENT YI'D AMENDED VAIllANCE
BUDGET ~ 12/31/90 BUDGET FAV/(UNFAV)
364,026 $ 182.244
(1.2e6) $
36,818
142,334
39,910
359,504 $ (4.522)
350,504
38.0e3
1,285
$ o8,oeo $ 1.2e6
COPY CENTER
INTERNAL SERVICE FUND
BUDGET SUMMARY
8CHEDUL.EA
Revenue
Expenses
Irmreue (decrease) in Retained Earn~
Retained Earnings, July 1, 1903
Retained EaLmings, June 30, 1994
FYe3-N FYB3-e4 FYg3-B4 FYg~i..N
CLRRENT YT'D AMENDED
BUDGET i) 12/31/93 BUDGET FAVI(UNFAV)
$ 119.014 $ 60,358
119,114
(loo) $
(2ez/4)
$ 141.762 $ 22.748
141,762
46.9~2
100
$ 46,952 $ 100
FACIUTIE8
SCHEDULE A
~eve~ue
Expenses
Increase (decrease) in Retained Earnings
Retained Earnings, July 1, 1993
Retained Earnings. June 30, 1994
476,297 $ 238.148
VARIANCE
FAVI(tJNFAV)
$ 481,717 $ 5,420
476,297 230,833 481,717 (5,420)
S 7,515
-Charge For Services
TOTAL FUND 300
-ira'cA t~e,~t Irltmtlt
-Charge For 8ervi~
TOTAL FUND 310
-Investment Interest
-Charges For Services
TOTAL FUND 320
-Investment Interest
-Charges For Services
TOTAL FUND 330
-Investment Interest
-Charges For Services
TOTAL FUND 340
INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS
REVENUE DETAIL
BY FUND 8OURCE
SCHEDULE B
FY93-94 FYg3-94 FYg3-N FYg3-94
CURRENT Yi'D REVISED ADJUSTMENT
BUDGET t 12/31/93 PROJECTION FAVI(UNFAV)
0 5,249 5,249 5,249
199,117 99,560 182,g~7' (6.1g0)
199,117 104,809 198,176 . (941)
0 1,326 1,326 1,326
199,661 54,330 109, 135 (528}
109,861 56,156 110,481 800
0 232 500 500
354,026 182,012 359,004 (5,022)
354,026 182,244 359,504 (4,522)
0 848 848 848
119,014 59, 510 140,914 21 ,gO0
119,014 60,358 141,762 22,748
0 0 500 500
476.297 238,148 481,217 4,920
476,297 338,148 481,71 7 5,420
1,268,115 541,71 5 1,291,620 23,505
Depreciation
Total Department 110
Depreciation
~tal Department 162
Operating Exper,:litures
Depreciation
Total Department 164
Operating Expendi. wes
Depreciation
Total Department 180
INTERNALSERVICEFUNDS
EXPENDITURE B~MARY
BYD~ARTME~
8CHEDU. E C
FYO3-N FYge-N FY93-04 FY93-64
CURRENT YTD AMENDED ADJUSTMENT
BUDQET i) 12/31/63 APPROPRIATION FAV/(UNFAV)
****.et*tl/ll&ll&li,,l e~-,,,,,a+eee,,,,-,,akee,k,*e,-, .ett. e***t**.e***e**.e**
28,817 10,584 24,840 1 ,T/'7
173,336 136,378 173,336 0
0 0 0 0
196,953 146,962 166,176 1,777
3,865 1 ,g83 3,865 0
4,ees 2,2e6 5,ems (coo)
10,000 5, 158 10,000 0
24,024 12,014 24,1324 0
34,1324 17, 172 34,024 0
13,500 5,715 13,500 0
30,716 12,859 30,716 0
44,216 18,574 44,216 0
7,500 5,192 7,500 0
19,0H 5,782 19,0H 0
26,556 10,974 26,556 0
Total DqwS'ne~ 1 ge
Perlonnel ~
Oper~ng ExpendiNre~
c..,p~ ou,ey
Total Deparlment 1 ~
INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS
EXPENDITtJI:IE BUMMARY
BY DEPARTMENT
SCHEDULE C
Ez~e2
BUDGET ; 12/31/13 APPROPRIATION FAV/(UNFAV)
63,680 28,474 59,195 4,487
301,61 1 115,860 300,311 1,300
0 0 0 0
365,291 142,334 359,504 5,787
29,841 11 ,gO3. :29,740 101
89,2'/3 76,729 112,022 (22,749)
0 0 0 0
119,114 88,832 141,782 (22,648)
./.. :! ;.: . ::.
Personnel 8m'vices 55,873 20,000 51,217 4,686
Operating Expenditures 420,424 210,633 430,500 '4-0/6)
Capita~ O~ey 0 0 0 0
Total Department 1 It
476,297 230,r~__ 48~,717 (s,420)
1,270,316 657,547 1,291,620 (21,304)
Revenue
Expenditures
Increase (decrease) in Fund Balance
Fund Balm, July 1, 1993
Fund Balance, June 30, 1994
CITY OF TEMECULA
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
REIMBURSEMENT DISTRICT
BUDGE SUMMARY
FY 93-94 FY 93-94
BUDGET @ 12/31/93
$ 147,278
$ 118,968 118,968
(118,968) $ 28,31 0
(817,'~)
EXHIBIT I
Page I
Revenue
Operating Transfers Out
Increase (decrease) in Fund Balm
Fund Balance, July 1, 1993
Fund Balance, June 30, 1994
$
$
CITY OF TEMECULA
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT
BUDGET SUMMARY
FY 93.94
BUDGET
3,456,857
7,003,581
(3,546,724) $
6,522,459
2,975,735
FY 93-94
12/31/93
,851,81 9
225,000
,626,819
Revenue
Expenditures
Excess of Revenues Over Expenditures
Operating Transfers Out
Increase (decrease) in Fund Balm
Fund Balance, July 1, 1993
Fund Balance, June 30, 1994
Revenue
Operating Transfers Out
Increase (decrease) in Fund Balance
Fund Balance, July 1, 1993
Fund Balm, June 30, 1994
CITY OF TEMECULA EXHIBIT I
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS Page 2
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT
BUDGET SUMMARY
R93-N
BUDGET
1~,261
~,~1
1~,460
1~,460
(19,365)
118,095
12/31/93
4,665
4,665
CITY OF TEMECULA
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
MEASURE 'A'
BUDGET SUMMARY
BUDGET @ 12/31/93
$ 668,129 $ 273,078
33,129 $ 273,078
$ 878,185
CITY OF TEMECULA
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
LOCAL TRANSPORTATION
BUDGET SUMMARY
EXHIBIT I
Page 3
Revenue
Operating Transfers Out
Increase (decrease) in Fund Balance
Fund Balance, July 1, 1993
Fund Balance, June 30, 1994
FY 93-94 FY 93-94
BUDGET @ 12/31/93
$ 42,800 $ 25,678
314,000 265,000
(~7~,~00) $ (239,3~)
502,711
$ 231,51 1
CITY OF TEMECULA
CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND
BUDGET SUMMARY
EXHIBIT II
Revenue
Expenditures
Excess of Revenues Over Expenditures
Operating Transfers In
Increase (decrease) in Fund Balm
Fund Balance, July 1,1993
Fund Balance, June 30, 1994
FY 9394 FY 9394
BUDGET @ 12/31/93
$ 1,527,200 $ 601,573
10,61 5,098 4,320,087
(9,087,898) (3,718,514)
(280,929) $ (3,493,514)
322,488
$ 8,848,528
P~RS0NN~-T ,_,A~ -I~OC~TIoN Ry DEPAR~,NT
(~ull T,,-e l~luivakuts ~
EXHIBIT
Page 1
Mid Year
~ Adjusted
1993-94 1993-94
1993-94
Deltauncut Total
5.00 0.00 5.00
5.00 0.00 5.00
c~y
Senior Management Analyst
Exec~ve Am~m-mt
Adminisw~ve Secretary
Human Resomx:~ Admlni,m.alor
personne~ s~
Department Total
DesCent: CrfY _c~-m~K
IZk~manmmU Total
1.~ 0.~ 1.~
1.~ 0.~ 1.~
1.50 0.~ 1.~
2.~ 0.~ 9.~
5.50 0.00 5.50
PF R QNN T . T ,T. .CATTON
~u11 T~me ]~!utvale~ts ]Lr~!,
EXHIBIT III
Page 2
DEPA RT NT I
MidYear
Am~xF-ed Adjusted
1993-94 1993-94 1993-94
Finance Officer
Chi~ Accounmm
Fmaucial Services Admlnimtqlior
SeuiorAx:couumai
Adminimtmtive Jlx:r,~y
Accouuting Speci,,.~
Accounting A-,..misT,,nt
1.~ 0.~ 1.~
1.~ 0.~ 1.~
0.~ 0.~ 0.~
1.~ 0.~ 1.~
0.~ 0.~ 0.~
3.00 0.00 3.00
2.50 0.00 2.50
10.00 0.00 10.00
~ of Planning
Senior Planner
Associate Planner
Assistant Planner
Planning Technician
Administrative Secretary
Office Specialist
Office A.e. si,~nt
1.00 0.00 1.00
2.00 ~.~ 1.~
2.00 ~.~ 1.60
2.00 0.00 2.00
3.00 0.00 3.00
1.00 0.00 1.00
1.00 0.00 1.00
1.00 0.00 1.00
Department Total
13.00 (0.60) 12.40
Detainment:
BUTT-nING AND S~
Chief Building Official
Senior Building tnspeaor
nwdiding In_npector II
Code Enforcement Officer
Building Xn_~inaor I
Building Technician
AdminiSnltive Secrellty
Office Assistant
DepartmentT~ 11.00 0.00 11.00
PF RSONNISI ,ALx OCb T ON ny DF, PARTMI NT
(Full Time Bquivalems listed, Continued)
EXHIBIT III
PaSe 3
Mid Year
Authorized Adjusted
1993-94 1993-94
1993-94
City Bngineer/Dimaor of Public Works
Principal ~ineer
Pemit ~aL, ineer
Associate ~qZineer
Senior Public Works InSpector
Assistant nngineer
Public Works In~i~*ctor
Adminim'rative Secxetary
Offi~ Ae. sistnnt
~mxt Tom1
PUBLIC WORKS
0.50 0.00
1.00 0.00
1.00 0.00
1.00 0.00
1.00 0.00
2.00 0.00
1.00 0.00
2.00 0.00
1.00 0.00
0.50 0.00
1.50 0.00
0.50
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
1.00
2.00
1.00
0.50
1.50
12.50 0.00 12.50
City r~glneer/Director of Public Works
Traffic Bngineer
Maintenance Superintendent
Senior Public Works Inspector
Public Works Inspector
Traffic Technician
Lead Mainte~nce Worker
Admlni~trafive ~
Yninten*nce Worker
Office A~istant
0.50 0.00
1.00 0.00
1.00 0.00
1.00 0.00
1.00 0.00
1.00 0.00
1.00 0.00
1.00 0.00
1.00 0.00
2.00 0.00
0.50 0.00
2.00 0.00
1.50 0.00
0.50
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
0.50
2.00
1.50
14.50 0.00 14.50
Pt~R~oNl~w. AJ J QCATwON
EXHIBIT III
Page
ev D. EPARTM~.NT ....
INTRQNAT. Sla~VICB FtYNDS
INSURANCE
Finsncisl Services Admini.,unsmr
Adminl,m,ative ~y
INFORMATIONS SY~
Information Systems aAdminisu'ratOr
COPY CENTER
Admini.,mltjve Technician
FACII-TITR~
MidYear
Authorized Adjust~
1993-94 1993-94 1993-94
0.25 0.00 0.25
0.25 0.00 0.25
Maimchance Worker
Custodian
Total lntetml Service Funds
Bml~¢!:~ O~ AGRNCY
PLANNING
4.50 0.00 4.50
Senior Planner
Associate Planner
0.~ 0.~ 0.~
0.~ 0.~ 0.~
EXHIBIT III
Page 5
PERSONN~,~]~,f~cAT~ON BY DFPARTI~NT
Authorized
1993-94
CCiIMUNITY S!~RVICllS
MidYear
]Vrsinte, m~_ Supc- ;,,t(--Itmt
Recreation Supendsor
Admininnalive ,~Cxv..lky
Maiu~ Worker
Vo~ CooMinator
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
1.00
2.00
2.00
1.00
?.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
1.00
2.00
2.00
1.00
?.00
Department Total
SHRVICE LEVEL A
14.00
14.00
T ~ndSCape
l:kiaftmeut Total
IX'eartm~t: SHRVICB T.TZVI:n. B
O.45
0.45
0.00
0.00
0.45
0.45
Office Assistant
Department ToUd
Dep~rtment: SERVICB T_T~/~T. C
1.00
1.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
1.00
Mamgcmcat AssL, mmt
T-,,,dsc~ Impmot
Total
1.00
0.55
1
0.00
0.00
1.00
0.55
Toud co~mu~ services13.11lo.o~~
EXHIBITIll
Page 6
Mid Year
1993-94 1993-94
1993-94
G'I~q]:II~A]'o l:rU]qT~
City Council 5.00 0.00 5.00
City Manager 5.00 0.00 5.00
Human Resomr. es 3.00 0.00 3.00
City Clzrk 5.50 0.00 5.50
Finance 10.00 0.00 10.00
PlanninZ 13.00 (0.60) 12.40
P-,,fldinz and Safety 11.00 0.00 11.00
~gineednZ 12.50 0.00 12.50
GAS TAX
Public Works 14.50 0.00 14.50
flq'Im~NAL SPm~VIC~- PUNnS
Insurance 0.50 0.00 0.50
Infonnation Services 1.00 0.00 1.00
Copy C~nter 1.00 0.00 1.00
Facilities 2.00 0.00 2.00
RRT~]~'V~ DPiVIRNT AGRNCY
Planning 0.00 0.60 0.60
COMM'UN1TY S~RVICu:t~
Community Services 14.00 0.00 14.00
Service Level A 0.45 0.00 0.45
Service Level B 1.00 0.00 1.00
Service Level C 1.55 0.00 1.55
TOTAL AEYlI-IO:RY73~n POSITIONS
101.00
ITEM NO.
7
~ PPROVI~ T.
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
City Manager/City Council
FROM:
Mary Jane McLarney, Finance Officer
DATE:
February 22, 1994
SUBJECT:
Property Insurance Renewal
PREPARED BY: Luci Romero, Financial Services Administrator
RECOMMENDATION: Approve the renewal of the City's property insurance coverage
with Aetna Insurance Company in an amount not to exceed $30,000, annual premium.
DISCUSSION: The City's current property insurance policy is provided by Aetna
Insurance Company. The policy coverage includes various insured locations (including
earthquake coverage), valuable papers, and electronic data processing equipment.
In addition to the proposal from Aetna, proposals were also received from: 1 ) Golden Eagle;
2) American States; 3) Deans & Homer; 4) California Insurance Group; 5) Mercury Casualty;
6) Fireman's Fund; and 7) Swett & Crawford. Due to the current moratorium on new
earthquake coverage, ell of the carriers were unable to provide earthquake coverage for the
City's insured locations.
The most significant change in the policy renewal is the inclusion of the new Community
Recreation Center (CRC). The addition of the CRC to the insured locations on the policy
increases the premium approximately 400%.
The proposal submitted by Aetna continues to provide the necessary coverage. Thus, staff
recommends renewal of the policy with Aetna Insurance Company in an annual premium
amount not to exceed $30,000. The premium amount has not been finalized to date,
however, the City's insurance broker has indicated that the amount will be well within the not
to exceed limit.
FISCAL IMPACT: The premium will be paid in semi-annual payments. Adequate
funds for the payment of the installment which is due in the current fiscal year, have been
appropriated in the Insurance Internal Service Fund.
ITEM
NO.
8
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
APPROVAL
City Council/City Manager
Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning
February 22, 1994
French Valley Airport Master Plan Update
Prepared By:
Matthew Fagan, Assistant Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
Receive and File
BACKGROUND
The following is a chronology of the French Valley Airport Master Plan:
The Phase I Report (Chapters 1-3) was sent to Staff .on July 13, 1993. This report
included information regarding inventory, forecasts and facility requirements for the
Airport. Staff attended a meeting on July 30, 1993, which at that time discussed the
Phase I Report. Comments on the Phase I Report were sent to the consultant on
September 14, 1993 (see attachment).
II.
The Phase 2 Report (Chapter 4) was received by Staff on October 14, 1993. This
report contained six development alternatives. Staff attended a meeting on October
21,1993, at which time, the Phase 2 Report was discussed. Comments on the Phase
2 Report were sent ot the consultant on November 22, 1993 (see attachment).
III.
An Addendum to the Phase 2 Report was received by Staff on January 28, 1994. This
report expanded the previous development alternatives discussed in the original Phase
2 Report. Four .alternatives were analyzed, with the focus on existing and future
impacts to land use, safety and noise. The consultant has recommended an alternative
that includes a 6,000 foot long runway, with a 3,400' parallel runway to the east. A
meeting to discuss the Addendum was held on February 4, 1994. Staff attended the
meeting.
The consultant for the project estimates that the Draft Environmental Impact Report and a
Final draft Comprehensive Land Use Plan will be available for review in March 1994. The Plan
will ultimately go before the Board of Supervisors and needs to be aiDproved by the Federal
Aviation Administration.
Please see me if you would like to see copies of the above referenced Reports, or if you have
any questions.
R:~T~CI. IVLY.CC 2/~94 kib 1
Attachments:
1. Letter Dated September 14, 1993 - Page 3
2. Letter Dated November 22, 1993 - Page 4
it:~TA~CIt'VLy.CC 2/0/~S klb 2
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
LETTER DATED SEPTEMBER 14, 1993
City of Temecula
19 43174 Business Park Drive · Temecula, California 92590
September 14, 1993
(909} 694-1989 · FAX 1909) 694-199c.
Mr: James M. Harris, P.E.
Coffrnan Associates, Inc.
11022 N. 28th Drive, Suite 240
Phoenix, AZ 85029
SUBJECT: City of Temecu la Planning Department Comments for French Valley Airport
Master Plan Phase 1 Report
Dear Mr. Harris:
The City of Temecula Planning DeparUnent has reviewed the above referenced Report and often
the following comments for your consideration:
Exhibit 1H - Historical and Forecast Population: This exhibit should include population
forecasts for the City of Temecula. Based upon estimates contained in the City' s Draft
General Plan, the population within the City of Teme~ula is projected to be 62,300 by
the year 2,000 and 87,800 by the year 2010. Population forec~Ets for the City' s northern
Sphere of Influence Area, where the airport is to be located, is projected to be 34,200
by the year 2000 and 67,500 by the year 2010. Please incorporate these population
forecasts into Exhibit 1H and utilize these forecasts in your analysis.
Exhibit 1L - Gene~liTcd Existing Land Uses: The following uses should be included on
this exhibit:
The Temecula Valley Unified School District high school site, located north and
west of Winchester Road, and south and east of the Santa Gertrudis Creek, near
the intersection of Nicolas and Winchester Roads (refer to the City's Draft
Preferred Land Use Plan for the approximate locate of this site).
b. The site of the Rivcnon Lane Park (see attached map for approximate location).
Cs
The school sites identified in the Silverhawk Specific Plan; Planning Areas No.
5 and 8 have been identified as potential sites (see attached map for approximate
location).
R:'~FAGANM%FRNCHVLY%FVAMI~HI.COM 9114/93
Mr. Harris
French Valley Airport
Page 2
The existing sensitive noise receptors (including churches) and those which will
be developed during the plan should be identified. Figure 84 of the City of
Temecula Draft General Plan has is included as an attachment and identifies
sensitive rec~tor locations within proximity to the airport.
Page 2-17 states that the avenge distances to all major air carrier airports is 100 miles;
this information is incorrect. Actual mad distances to the nearby commercial airports
are as follows: 58 miles to San Diego International Airport, 60 miles to Ontario
International Airport, 64 miles to John Wayne Airport (Orange County), and 100 miles
to Los Angeles International Airport. Titis will have an effect on the travel patterns and
demands for commuter service at French Valley Airport.
Table 3A on Page 3-6. Why is column included for Class D aircraft in the table? The
table states that Class C aircraft have a gross weight between 12,500 pounds and 300,000
pounds. What is the gross weight for Class D aircraft? Please expand the information
contained within this table for clarity.
Table 3C on Page 3-9 contains information which needs to be further explained in the
report. The analysis of larger aircraft with sixty and ninety percent useful loads is not
clearly discussed in the report. In addition, if the analysis which is provided is being
used to justify the expansion of the runway, then the runway should be expanded to the
north, away from population concentrations.
Exhibk 3B - Airside Facility Requirements is unclear. Please explain why short term
and ultimate airport facilities the same. In addition, please include the source of the
information contained in the matrix.
Exhibk 3C - Landside Facility Eequirements states that there is one (1) existing
commuter tie down at the airport. Is this information correct? Please verify the number
of existing commuter tie downs at the airport.
Projected airport needs should be ascer~nined from existing businesses/industries within
the airport vicinity. Growth patterns for these businesses/industries, as wen as their
aircraft/flight needs will provide valuable information in terms of the role of the future
airport needs.
A copy of the City of Temecula Draft Preferred Land Use Plan is enclosed for your reference.
Although this plan has not been adopted, it can be used as a guide for further analysis regarding
the Airport Master Plan and its impact on the surrounding area.
R:~FAGANM~FRNCHVLY~FVAMPPHI.COM 9/14/93 tjs
Mr. Harris
French Vnlley Airport
Page 3
The City of Temecula Planning Department appreciates the opportunity to comment on Phase
11Lepon for the French Valley Airport Master Plan and looks forward to reviewing future
documents relative to this project. We are available to offer any assistance and information that
you would require concerning the areas surrounding the French Valley Airport.
Should you have any questions, please contact Matthew Fagan at (909) 694-6400.
R:\FAGANI~FRNCHVLY'xFVAMPPHI.COM 9/14/93 tjs
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
LETTER DATED NOVEMBER 22, 1993
R:Wf~CHVLY.CC 2/N9~ lab 4
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive · Temecula, California 92590
(909) 694--1989 · FAX [909) 694--1999
November 22, 1993
Mr. James M. Hart'is, P.E.
Coffman Associates, Inc.
11022 N. 28th Drive, Suite 240
Phoenix, AZ 85029
SUBJECT: Comments for French Valley Airport Master Plan Phase 2 Report
Thank you for the opportunity to review the Phase 2 Report for the French Valley Airport
Facility Master Plan. The French Valley Airport is within the future urban service area (Sphere
of Influence) for the City of Temecuh as defined by the Local Agency Formation Commi,~sion,
and is included in the Planning Area for the City General Plan.
The City of Temecuh is concerned about noise and safety impacts from the facility on the
current and future residents in the French Valley and Nicolas Valley areas. Should the rimway
be extended, the City of Temecuh would prefer that any future extensions be done to the north,
away from the existing urb~niTed areas. This would help to reduce any future noise impacts
from an expanded facility.
In addition, the alternatives presented in the Phase 2 Report do not appear to integrate the airside
and landside facilities. The alternatives in the Report should integrate these facilities into
complete alternatives to enable a meaningful analysis. This integration of the ainide and
landside facilities is especis~y important if the provision of commercial air service is a
component of the preferred alternative.
Thank you again for the opportunity to review the Phase 2 Report. If you have any questions
regarding our concerns, or it we can be of assistance in preparing the Master or Land Use Plans,
please contact Matthew Fagan at (909) 694-6400.
Sincerely,
Gary Thornhill
Dir~tor of Planning
cc: Judy Ross, Aviation Division
R:~FRNCh'VLY.AffilPHA,~EI.LTR 11/22/93 tin
ITEM
NO.
9
APPROVAl
CITY ATTORNL~f_~
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
February 22, 1994
Acceptance of an Offer of Dedication - Portions of Campanula Way and
Acceptance Into the City-Maintained Storm Drain System - Storm Drain
Facilities within Portions of Campanula Way
PREPARED BY: Jim D. Fsul, Assistant Engineer - Land Development
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council adopt s resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 94-_
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE OFFER OF
DEDICATION OF, PORTIONS OF CAMPANULA WAY AND
ACCEPTING STORM DRAIN FACILITIES WITHIN PORTIONS OF
CAMPANULA WAY' INTO THE CITY-MAINTAINED STORM
DRAIN SYSTEM
BACKGROUND:
On January 25, 1994, the City Council of the City of Temecula spproved an Offer of
Dedication for the realignment of Campanula Way. On February 8, 1994, the City Council of
the City of Temecula approved an acceptance of an Offer of Dedication and an acceptance
into the City-maintained street system of a portion of the realigned Campanula Way.
Kemper Real Estate Development Company (KRDC) also has improved, to City standards,
storm drain facilities within Campanule Way to provide drainage to the Palores Del Sol Park
Site. KRDC, Inc. has constructed these drainage facilities as a condition of the Development
Agreement for Paloma Del Sol. These facilities are located in a portion of Campanula Way not
previously accepted by the City.
PwOb'~Ndq~t%94%O222~mpwey.eep
FISCAL IMPACT:
Sufficient funds are available in Public Works Drainage Facilities Maintenance Account No.
100-164-999-5401.
ATTACHMENTS:
Resolution No. 94-
with Exhibits "A-B", inclusive.
pwO~gdrpt~i~O~wm/.eap
RESOLUTION NO. 94-
A ~LUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECUIA, CALIFORNIA, ACt3aq~NG TI~OFFER OFDI~DICATION
OF PORTIONS OF CAMPANULA WAY AND ACui~ItNG STORM
DRAIN FACn~rrlES WItHIll A PORTION OF CAMPANULA WAY INTO
THE CITY-MAINTAINED STORM DRAIN SYSTEM
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE
AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Wlfl;IREAS, Kernper Real Estate Development Company (KRDC) has offered for dedication
to the City, Campanula Way, and the Offer of Dedication has been recorded as Instrument No.
Campnnula Way, the legal description of which is set forth in Exhibit *A" and is depicted in
Exhibit 'B".
WHimRAS, the City desires to accept the Offer of Dedication for those portions of
Campanula Way as depicted in Exhibit "B";
WH~:REAS, the City desires to accept into the City-maintained storm drain system the
improved storm drain facilities with portions of Campanula Way as depicted in Exhibit "B" ;
NOW, THERRFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Temecula as
follows:
Section 1. That the City of Temecula accepts the Offer of Dedication for those portions of
Campanula Way described in Exhibits "A" and "B" aUached haeW.
Section 2. That the City of Temecula accept into the City-maintained store drain system
those storm drain facilities within portions of Campanula Way described in Exhibits "A" and
"B' attached hereto.
Section 3. The City Clerk shall c6firy the adoption of this resolution and accept the Offer
of Dedication for the property desaibed in Exhibits "A" and "B" attached herere.
PASSED, APPROVEB, AND ADOFrED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at
a regular meeting held on the 22rid day of February, 1994.
Ron Robeits, Mayor
pwO6~gdqm94%O222~mwnpway.map
A~T:
June S. Greek
city
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
CITY OF TEMECULA
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that
Resolution No. 94- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 22nd day of February, 1994, by the following
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMB~:
COUNCH,MEMBERS:
COUNCH-,MEMBERS:
vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
pwOS~egdrpt%94%O222%oempwey.,,q~
EXHIBIT "A' TO RESOLUTION NO. 94-
Accepting the Offer of Dedication and accepting into the City-
maintained storm drain system, storm drain facilities within
portions of Campanula Way.
(Legal description attached)
ROBERT BEIN, WILLIAH FROST AND ASSOCIATES
28765 Single Oak Drive
Temecul a, Ca1 t fornt a 92590
EX!IIBIT "A"
lEGAl DESCRIIr[ION
RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR CAMPANULA WAY
ACCESS TO PARK SITE
3anuary 24, 1994
ON 400488-M4
Page I of 3
Those certain parcels of land situated in the City of Temecula, County of
Riverside, State of California, being those portions of Parcel 2 of Parcel Map
No. 23432 filed in Book 159, Pages 38 through 6] of Parcel Maps in the Office of
the County Recorder of said Riverside County, described as follows:
"- DARCFL 1 (Stret Rtuht-of-ia'v)
CG:..:"CING at the intersection of the centerline of Meadows Parkway with
cente~./ne of Campanula Way as shown on said parcel map, said inters
hereinaf~. being referred to as Point "A";
Thence along s.,_4 centerline of Campanula Way South 54'00'00" W~
to the beginning _~ a tangent curve concave herly and h.
lOOO.OO feet; - -, e~ter
Thence along said curve -.Isterly 691.21 f
39'36'12";
23.00 feet
a radius of
a central angle of
Thence tangent from said
of a tangent curve
~rth 86'23'48
.asterly
feet to the beginning
of 1000.00 feet;
Thence along .51
46'12'35" to
h a central angle of
Thence continuim
angle of 7'36'13"
132 '1 feet through a central
Thence tangent from curve North 5'00' West 64 to a point on a
curve in the sou* y line of De Road (]00.00 as shown
on said parce , said curve being concave northwesterly and a radius
of 1250.00 a radial line of said curve from said ~t bears
North 32 West, said point being hereinafter referred to as Po* 'B";
Thl
ong said curve and southeasterly line northeasterly 71.72 feet
angle of 3'17'15";
Robert Bein, William Frost & Associates
Right-of-Way for Campanula Way
Access to Park Site
January 24, 1994
3N 400488-M4
Page 2 of 3
· non-tangent froe said curve South 10'46'23" West 31.58 line
para d/or concentric with and 50.00 feet northerly and y from
the afore d line running between id Point "A" B";
para · no~e1 the following courses:
South 32'35'00" East to a tangent curve concave
northeasterly and of
Thence along said
7'36'13";
through a central angle of
Thence leavi
South 4
parallel concentric line,
West 50.00 to the TRUE POllIT OF BEGINNING.
said curve
0.228 Acres, more or less.
PARCEL 2 (Drainage)
BEGINNING at Point "B" as hereinbefore described in Parcel 1, said point being
on a curve in the southeasterly line of De Portola Road (100.00 feet wide) as
shown on said parcel map, said curve being concave northwesterly and having a
radius of 1250.00 feet, a radial line of said curve from said point bears
North 32'35'00' West;
Thence along said curve and southeasterly line southwesterly 71.72 feet through
a central angle of 3'17'15";
Thence non-tangent from said curve South 75'56'23" East 31.58 feet to a line
parallel and/or concentric with and 50.00 feet southerly and southwesterly from
the aforedescribed line running from Point "A" to Point "B" as hereinbefore
described in Parcel 1;
Thence North 57'25'00" East 50.00 feet to said line running from Point "A" to
Point "B";
Thence along said line North 32'35'00" West 20.91 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING:
0.030 Acres, more or less.
PARCEL 3 (Drainage)
A strip of land 30.00 feet*wide, the centerline of which is described as follows:
COIeiENCING at Point'B" as hereinbefore described in Parcel 1;
Robert Bern, Utlliam Frost & Associates
Right-of-liay for Campanula liay
Access to Park Site
January 24, 1994
JN 400488-H4
Page 3 of 3
Thence along the aforedescribed 11ne running from Point "A" to Point "B"
heretnbefore described tn Parcel ] South 32'35'00" East 64.4] feet to the
beginning .of a tangent curve tn said line concave northeasterly and having
radius of ]000.00 feet;
Thence along said curve southeasterly 89.91 feet through a central angle of
5'09'05" to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
Thence radially from said curve South 52']5'55" llest 25.00 feet to the POTlIT OF
TERNINATZON,
Said strip of land shall be lengthened or shortened northeasterly so as to
terminate tn said line running from Point "A'to Point "B".
CONTAZNZNG:
0.017 Acres, more or less.
SUBJECT TO all covenants, rights, rights-of-way and easements of record.
EXHZBZT "B" attached and by this reference made a part hereof.
~%~CEL e~.~ Lawrence L. Bacon, L.S. 3527
L.S. 3527
~p. 6 - 30 - 96 *
POL, 4
PARCEL MAP
PARCEL
NO. 23452
159 / 38-61
SHEET
PCL. 4
PARCEL
~,~'
PC'L. I
PCL. 5
23432
MAP NO.
159 I 38-61
PCL.
..
PCL. ' Y 51
NIt//WAY
EXHIBIT "B" sKETCH
TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION
CAMPAAIU/A WAY
ACCESS T~ PIIRKSlT~:
S#ET I ~F ~ Stl:-Lrr5
dAt~. Z4,/~4~4L J.N. 4oo4ee,.M4
EXHIBIT "B" TO RESOLUTION NO. 94-
SUBJECT ACCEPTANCE - STORM DRAIN FACILITIES WITHIN PORTIONS OF
CAMPANULA WAY
(Vicinity Map Attached)
ITEM NO. 10
~PPROV~T.
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council
David F. Dixon
City Manager
February 22, 1994
Booking Fees
PREPARED BY: City Clerk June S. Greek
RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the Mayor to execute the appropriate documents to
resolve the booking fees question pursuant to SB 2557.
BACKGROUND: Staff will finelize a staff report on this item end forward it to you under
separBte cover.
Swj
'APPROVAL
CITY-ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER ~
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
A GENDA REPORT
City Council
David F. Dixon
February 22, 1994
Booking Fees Pursuant to SB 2557
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council authorize the Mayor to sign appropriate
documents relative to the settlement of the booking fee issue.
STAFF REPORT:
Senate Bill 2557 was signed by the Governor on or about July 1, 1990. It provided
the County with authority to charge fees for booking prisoners into the county jail by
police officers of the City. The County adopted Resolution 650, Ordinance 702
effective March 21, 1991 which provided for criminal justice administrative fees
(booking fees) to be retroactive to July 1, 1990. The County then proceeded to send
invoices to various cities in the county and has continued that process through
December 1993. A number of cities in the county filed suit against the County for
relief of the aforementioned booking fees, especially retroactivity of these booking
?
fees.
The City of Temecula did not join the lawsuit but we have been asked to be a party
to the settlement agreement so that the County can be assured that the issue of
booking fees with all of the cities in the county is resolved once and for all.
You will recall that the County notified the City of Temecula that if the booking fee
issue was not resolved during fiscal year 1993-1994 they would cease to provide
contract services to the City of Temecula for police protection. The County's position
at the time of the notification was that they would settle the booking fee issue and
continue to provide public safety services (i.e. Sheriff service). If the City of
Temecula would agree to pay booking fees from March 1993 through fiscal year
1993-1994 and continue paying booking fees as long as their ordinance was in effect.
Over the past several months we have been meeting to resolve the issue and in our
AGENDA REPORT:
February 17, 1994
Page 2
BOOK~NG FEES
recent discussions we have come to a resolution of the booking fees. This resolution
was brought about collectively with the majority of the cities in the county working
as a cohesive group and bringing forth a solution to the problem. Therefore, the
resolution for the City of Temecula and other contract cities is that we will only be
obligated for booking fees from September 1993 through this fiscal year and through
the coming years pursuant to the County's Ordinance 702. It is anticipated that we
will have booking fees of approximately $10,000 per month and for fiscal 1993-1994
it will total approximately $100,000. Booking Fees will continue as long as the
County's Ordinance 702 is in effect. Also, the County has received a credit for past
retirement payments and a credit of more than $222,000 will be coming to the City.
Therefore, we will have a positive in this transaction of more than $122,000.
The final ~ettlement documents have not yet been prepared but I would recommend
that the City Council authorize the Mayor to sign the appropriate documents once
they have been reviewed by the City Attorney.
ITEM NO. I I
ORDINANCE
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
~A ADOPTING PORTIONS OF THE OLD TOWN
SPECIFIC PLAN, AMENDING ~ OFFICIAL ZONING MAP FOR
THE CITY OF TIEMECUIA, AND AMENDING CITY
ORDINANCES 90-04, 92-16, AND 93-12
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEIVlECULA DOES I-~REBY ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Findings. The Temecula City Council hereby makes the following findings:
A. The City Council adopted the General Plan on November 9, 1993.
B. The maintenance and protection of historic Old Town Temecula is an important
issue and concern to the citizens of Temecuh.
C. The General Plan for the City of Temecula calls for the preparation of a Specific
Plan for Old Town Temecuh.
D. The Specific Plan for the Old Town will establish regulations and programs to
address the land use, architectural design, economic development, business revitalization, and
historic preservation issues in and around Old Town.
E. The Planning Commission has determined that the Old Town Specific Plan is
consistent with the General Plan for the City of Temecuh.
F. The City Council approved and adopted the Old Town Specific Phn on
October 26, 1993.
G. The Board of Supervisors adopted Ordinance 578 which provided for the
protection of historic resources and the creation of Historic Preservation Districts on October
23, 1979.
H. The Board of Supervisors designated portions of Old Town Temecula as a Historic
Preservation Districts on October 14, 1980.
I. The City Council adopted Ordinance 90-04, which adopted by reference
Riverside County Ordinance No. 578, which the Council has subsequenfiy amended through
various City Ordinances.
5~rds\94-05 I
J. The City Council expanded the boundary of Historic District on November 12,
1991 to include all the areas which are currently covered by the Old Town Specific Plan.
K. The City Council adopted Ordinance 92-16 providing standards for temporary
signs in commercial and service districts on October 16, 1992. Ordinance 92-16 was amended
by Ordinance 93-16 on June 8, 1993.
L. To ensure compatibility with and consistency between the various City Ordinances
and the Old Town Specific Plan it will be necessary to repeal or amend some of these
M. The Planning Commission approved the Plan and recommended that it be adopted
by the City Council on June 7, 1993.
N. The notice of the proposed Ordinance was posted at City Hall, County Library,
Rancho California Branch, the U.S. Post Office and the Temecuh Valley Chamber of
Commerce.
O. A 'public hearing was conducted on February 8, 1994, at which time interested
persons has an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition.
P. The Negative Declaration for the Old Town Specific Plan was certified by the
City Council on February 8, 1994.
Section 2. The Land Use and Development Standards conutined in Section HI of
Attachment 1, the Old Town Specific Plan, are hereby adopted as the Development Standards
for this Specific Plan (SP) Zone pursuant to Section 17.28 of Riverside County Ordinance No.
348, as adopted by reference pursuant to City Ordinance 90-04.
Section 3. The Official Zoning Map for the City of Temecula is hereby amended to
change the Zoning Districts within the boundary of the Specific Plan as shown on Exhibit 2 of
Specific Plan, from C-1 (General Commercial), C-P (Restricted Commercial), C-P-S (Scenic
Highway Commercial), M-SC (Manufacturing-Service Commercial), R-1 (One Family
Dwellings), R-2 (Multiple Family Dwellings), R-3 (General Residential), R-R (Rural
Residential), and W-1 (Watercourse, Watershed & Conservation Areas), to "SP Specific Plan*.
Section 4. Section 15 of Ordinance No. 90-04 is hereby amended to read as follows:
"Ordinance Nos. 575, 576, 577, 579, 580 and 581, are hereby adopted by
reference."
Section 5. Subsection z. of Section 19.2. of Article XIX of Ordinance No. 348, which
was adopted by City Ordinance 92-16 is hereby amended to read as follows:
"z. "Temporary Sign Event" means any number of consecutive days,
up to thirty (30), for the display of any promotional sign."
5~-ds~94-05 2
Section 6. Subsection co. of Section 19.2. of Article XIX of Ordinance No.
which was adopted by City Ordinance 92-16 is hereby mended to r~a__d as follows:
~g8,
"ec. "Historic Old Town Temecula" means all the land use districts
within the Old Town Specific Plan, except for the Highway Tourist Commercial and Community
Commercial Districts. '
Section 7. Subsection C.2. of Section 19.10. of Article XIX of Ordinance No. 348,
which was adopted by City Ordinance 92-16, and amended by City Ordinance 93-12, is hereby
amended as follows:
"2.
Portable signs, including but not limited to animals, human beings, A-
Frames, T-Frames, and those of a similar nature located on private
property, except as pennitu~ by the Old Town Specific Plan."
Section 8. Subsection C.9. of Section 19.10. of Article XIX of Ordinance No. 348,
which was adopted by City Ordinance 92-16 is hereby repealed.
Section 9. Subsection d of Section 19.10 of Article XIX of Ordinance No. 348, which
was adopted by City Ordinance 92-16 is hereby amended to read as follows:
"D. Promotional Signs in Historic Old Town Temecula. Promotional signs in Historic
Old Town Temecula are permitted in the Community Commercial, Tourist Retail Core,
Community Commercial & Tourist Support, and with appmved commercial uses in the Tourist
Serving Residential Districts and shall comply with the requirements of the Old Town Specific
Plan. Window signs which are consistent with the provisions of the Old Town Specific Plan do
not require a permit."
Section 10. The introductory paragraph of Subsection E. of Section 19.10. of Article
XIX of Ordinance No. 348, which was adopted by City Ordinance 92-16 is hereby amended to
read as follows:
"E. Grand Opening and Interim Signs in Historic Old Town Temecula. Grand
opening and interim signs in Historic Old Town Temecula are permitted in the Community
Commercial, Tourist Retail Core, Community Commereial/Tourist Support Districts, with
approved commercial uses in the Tourist Serving Residential District, and shall comply with the
requirements listed below:"
Section 11. F. nvironmental Compliance. An Initial Environmental Study was prepared
for this project. The Initial Environmental Study determined that no additional impacts beyond
those impacts identified in the Environmental Impact Report for the General Plan. Therefore,
a Negative Declaration is hereby certified for this project.
Section 12, P. ffec~ve Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty
(30) days after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and
cause copies of this Ordinance to be pested in three designated pesting places.
5Xotds\94-05 3
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADO~, this day, the 22nd day of February, 1994.
Ron Roberts, Mayor
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
5Xordm~94-05 4
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERS~E) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, I-IF~RF. Ry DO CERTIFY that the
foregoing Ordinance No. 94-05 was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular
meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 8th day of February, 1994, and that
thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council
of the City of Temecula on the 22nd day of February, 1994, by the following roll call vote:
AYES: 3
COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Parks,
NOES: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS: None
COUNCH.,MEMBERS: None
ABSTAINED: 2
COUNCILMEMBERS: Mu~oz, Stone
June S. Greek, City Clerk
5\ords\94-05 5
· ITEM NO. 12
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY ',~,
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Gary Thornhill, Director of Planningy~'
February 22, 1994
An Amendment to Section 18.28.A.C.(10)of Ordinance No. 348 Pertaining to
the Type of Paving Material Required for Access to Second Dwelling Units
Prepared By:
Matthew Fagan, Assistant Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council:
Read by title only and introduce an Ordinance entitled:
"AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF CITY OF
TEMECULA, AMENDING SECTION NO. 18.28.A.C.(10)OF
ORDINANCE NO. 348 PERTAINING TO THE TYPE OF PAVING
MATERIAL REQUIRED FOR ACCESS TO SECOND DWELLING
UNITS"
BACKGROUND
The City Council, at their January 11, 1994 meeting directed the Planning Commission to
consider an Amendment to Section No. 18.28.A.C(10)of Ordinance No. '348 - a requirement
for all-weather access for emergency vehicles to any second unit placed more than 150 feet
form a public right-of-way. This ordinance amendment would allow staff to exercise some
"flexibility" to the existing requirements.
The Planning Commission approved an Amendment to Section No. 18.28.A.C(10) of
Ordinance No. 348 at their February 8, 1994 meeting by a 4-1 vote (Commissioner Hoagland
voted in opposition to the Amendment). They recommended language in the Ordinance
Amendment that would require the applicant to maintain the roadway. In addition, they
recommended that the waiver be executed prior to the issuance of building permits. This
language has been included in the Ordinance Amendment contained within this report
(reference Attachment No. 1 ).
FISCAL IMPACT
None.
R:\STAFFRPT\PAVE-0RD.CC 21141~ ktb 1
Attachments:
Ordinance No. 94- - Page 3
Planning Commission Staff Report - Page 7
Draft Planning Commission Minutes - Page 8
R:\STAFFRPT\PAVE-ORD.CC 2/16/9~ ktb 2
A'I'I'ACHMENT NO. 1
ORDINANCE NO. 94-
R:\STAFFRPT\PAVE-0RD.CC 2114194 ktb 3
ATrACHIVInNT NO. 2
ORDINANCE NO. 94-
AN ORDINANCE OF TRY~ C1TY COUNCIL OF CITY OF
TI~!ECULA, ~ING SECTION NO. 18.28.A.C.(10) OF
ORDINANCE NO. 348 PERTAINING TO ~ TYPE OF
PAVING MATERIAL REQUIIH~D FOR ACCESS TO
SECOND DVtrl~JJJ~Cv UN]'r8
CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY OF TEMECULA, STATE OF
CALIH)RNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. City Oulinance No. 90-04 adopted by reference certain portions of the Non-
Codified Riverside County Ordinances, including Ordinance No. 348. Section 18.28.a.c.(10)
of Ordinance No. 348 is hereby amended to read as follows:
"(10)
Any second unit placed more than 1S0 feet from a public right-of-way sh~ll be
required to provide all-weather access for emergency vehicles from a publicly
maintained wad. Asphaltic or concrete paving is required for all-weather access;
however, this requirement may be waived ff all of the following conditions are
met:
A soils report (prepared by a licensed son or civil engheer) is submiUed
to the Depar~ent of Public Works for approval. The report shall
determine the stability of the soils at the project site and contain
recommendations for alternative material types and any associated
drainage facilities that will support a 30,000 pound emergency vehicle.
Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall ~ a
waiver, releasing the City of Temecula of any liability in the event that
emergency vehicles cannot u~!iTe the drive lane.
The all-weather access shall be continuously maintained by the property
owner such that it will support a 30,000 pound emergency vehicle at all
The City of Temecuh will not accept or msintsin the roadway until it has
been improved to City of Temecula Standards as identified in the
Circulation Blement of the General Plan."
Section 2. Severability. The City Council hereby declares that the pwvisions of this
Ordinance is sevemble and ff for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any
sentence, pamgx~h, or section of this ordinance to be invalid, such decisions shall not affect
the validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance.
R:\STAFFRPT\PAVE-ORD.CC 2/15/9~ ktb 4
Section 3. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its
passage. The City Cleric shall certify to the adoption of thi.~ Ordinance. The City Cledc shall
publish a summary of this Offfinance and a certified copy of the full text of this Ordinance shall
be posted in the office of the City Clerk at least five days prior to the adoption of this
Ordinance. Within 15 days from adoption of this Ordimnce, the City Clerk shall publish a
summary of this Ordirmnce, together with the names of the Councilmemben voting for and
against the Ordinance, and post the same in the office of the City Clerk.
Section 4. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of
199.
ATTEST:
RON ROBBRTS
MAYOR
~lune S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
R:\STAFFRPT\PAVE-QRD.CC 2/15/96 ktb 5
STATB OF CP, LrFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss
CITY OF T!~tLr'l.r!A)
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the
foregoing ~ No. 94-_ was duly introduced and placed upon i~s tint reading at a regular
meeting of the City Council on the day of , 199_, and thai therea~r, said
Ordinance was duly adopted and passed a regular meeting of the City Council on the ~ day
of , 1994 by the following ton call vote:
COUNCII31EMBER$:
NOES:
COUNCrLMEMBERS:
COUNC~LM]~J~P~:
lune S. ~, City Clerk
Scott F. Field
City Attorney
R:\STAFFRPT\PAVE-ORD,CC Z/15/~ ktb 6
ATI'ACHMENT NO. 2
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
FEBRUARY 7, 1994
R:\STAFFRPT\PAVE-ORD.CC 2/14/W, ktb 7
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Planning Commission
Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning~''
February 7, 1994
An Amendment to Section 18.28.A.C.(10) of Ordinance No. 348 Pertaining to
the Type of Paving Material Required for Access to Second Dwelling Units
Prepared By:
Matthew Fagan, Assistant Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
ADOPT Resolution No. 94- recommending approval of an
amendment to Section 18.28.A.Co(10) of-Ordinance No. 348
entitled:
"AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF CITY OF
TEMECULA, AMENDING SECTION NO. 18.28.A.C.(10) OF
ORDINANCE NO. 348 PERTAINING TO THE TYPE OF PAVING
MATERIAL REQUIRED FOR ACCESS TO SECOND DWELLING
UNITS"
BACKGROUND
On November 1,1993 the Planning Commission approved Planning Application No. 93-0179,
Amendment No. 1, for a second dwelling unit. At that meeting, the Commission was
informed that pursuant to Section 18.28.A.C.(10) of Ordinance No. 348, any second unit
placed more than 150 feet from a public right-of-way shall be required to provide all-weather
access for emergency vehicles. Current ordinance provisions require a 28' wide asphaltic
concrete paved road. The applicant, in this case, would have been .required to provide
approximately 500 feet of 28 foot wide asphaltic concrsted paved road to provide all-weather
access per Ordinance No. 348. The applicant expressed that would be a hardship for them.
The Commission approved the project with no modification to this requirement.
Subsequently, the applicant filed an appeal to the City Council appealing the Conditions of
Approval requiring street improvement plans and the strict interpretation of "all-weather"
aCCeSS.
The City Council, at their January 11, 1994 meeting, seeked to provide some relief for
applications of this type. They directed the Commission to consider an Amendment to
Section No. 18.28.A.C(10) of Ordinance No. 348 - a requirement for all-weather access for
emergency vehicles to any second unit placed more than 150 feet form a public right-of-way.
This ordinance amendment will allow staff to exercise some "flexibility" to the existing
requirements. The draft Ordinance Amendment is included in this report as Attachment No.
2.
R:~TAReRYI~PA~.~ 2~1/94 Idb 1
DISCUSSION
Staff prepared the language for the Ordinance Amendment at the direction of the City Council.
It was the Council's intent to provide relief from the existing requirement for one specific type
of paving material for "all-weather" access. The language was provided by the City Attorney,
the Riverside County Fire Department, the Planning Department and the Department of Public
Works. The draft Ordinance was included in the City Council Staff Report dated January 11,
1994.
The recommended language for the amendment to Section 18.28.a.c.(10) of Ordinance No.
348 is indicated in bold:
"Any second unit placed more than 150 feet from a public right-of-way shall be required to
provide all-weather access for emergency vehicles from a pubiidy maintained mad. Asphaltic
or concrete paving is required for all-weather access; however, this requirement may be
waived if all of the following conditions are met:
A soils report (prepared by a licensed soil or civil engineer) is submitted
to the Department of Public Works for approval. The report shall
determine the ability of the soils at ~e project site and contain
recommendations for altamative material types and any associated
drainage facilities that will support a 30,000 pound emergency vehicle.
The applicant records a waiver against the property, releasing the City
of Temecula of any liability in the event that emergency vehicles cannot
utilize the ddve lane.
The City of Temecula will not accept or maintain the roadway until it
has been improved to City of Temecula Standards as identified in the
Circulation Bement of the General Plan."
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
This Ordinance Amendment is Categorically Exempt from the California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15303 of the CEQA Guidelines. This exemption applies to
the construction and location of limited numbers of new structures including single-family
residences not in conjunction with the building of two or more such units. Construction of
a driveway to the structure is a logical component of this section. In addition, because of
limited City-wide second unit application, the cumulative impact of this Ordinance Amendment
will not be significant.
Attachments:
PC Resolution - Blue Page 3
Draft Ordinance - Blue Page 6
R:~rAPI~Pr~A~aD.PC 2/1~ ~b 2
A'!'rACHMENT NO. 1
RESOLUTION NO. 94.-
ATrA~ NO. 1
RESOLUTION NO. 94 -
A RESOLUTION OF TffE FLANNING CO1VIM't.~SION OF
~ CITY OF TEMECULA RECO~INC, APPROVAL
OF AN AMENDMENT TO SECTION NO. 18.28.A.C.(10) OF
ORDINANCE NO. 348 PERTAINING TO ~ TYPE OF
PAVING MATERIAL REQUI~ FOR ACCESS TO
SECOND DW~-r.~IG UNITS
WHKR~,~, the Planning Commition considered an Amendment to Section No.
18.28.a.c.(10) to Ordinanc~ No. 348 on February 7, 1994, at a duly noticed public hearing as
prescribed by law, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in
support or in opposition;
WHERE&S, at said public hpmring, upon hearing and considering all testimony and
arguments, ff any, of all persons deserving to be heard, the Commi,~ion considered all facts
NOW, T~'~FORE, ~ PLANNING COMMtgSION OF ~ CITY OF
TEME~ DOES RESOLd, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOIJ~OWS:
Section 1. That the above recitations are tn~e and corre~.
S~tion 2. Findin~,s.
A. The Planning Comminsion in recommending approval of an Amendment to SeCtion
No. 18.2g.a.c.(10) to Ordinan~ No. 348 makes the following findings, to wit:
1. It is the Mission of the City of Temecula to mnintnin a safe, secure, clean,
healthy and orderly community.
2. It is necess3ry to re-examine the regulations of the zoning ordinance
relating to the type of paving material required for access to second dwelling units.
3. The On~nan~ Amendment will not have a significant impa~t on the
environment since the project is a Class 3 Categorical Exemption pursuant to the C~liforllia
Environmental Quality Act.
4. The Ordinnnc~ Amendment will result to the logical development of the
City, and is compatible with the present and future development of the surrounding property.
5. The Ordinance Amendment is compatible with the health, safety and
weftare of the community.
R:~T~AVB-OID.PC ~1/9~. klb 4
Section 3. l~vironmcntal Cofflpllan~,. This ~~ ~c~t h ~~y
~ ~m tc ~o~ h~m~ ~ ~ (~A) p~ e S~ 15303
· c ~A G~aideline& ~ ~~on ~ ~ ~ ~~on ~d 1~ ~ !im~
nm~n of ff m~ ~g ~g~y ~~ n~ ~ ~nj~on wit ~ b~g
of mo or mo~ inch ~U. Com~n ~ a ~veway m ~ m~ b a 1o~ ~m~t
of ~ ~on. ~ ~~, ~q~ ~ lim~ C~-w~ ~ ~t ~~on, ~ m~ve
~ of ~ ~ ~~ w~ ~ ~ ~.
Seefion 4. PASSliD, APPROVED AND ADOPTRB thi.~ 7th day of February, 1994.
STEVEN J. FORD
CHAIRMAN
I/m'.~ty CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 7th day of
February, 1994 by the following vote of the Commition:
PLANNING CO1VHVHSSIONERS:
NOES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
G~Y~ORNtm~-
SECRECY
R:~TAI~mltFI~IsAVB-ORD.PC 2/1/~S ldb 5
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
DRAFT ORDINANCE NO. 94.-
R:~rAFF]/Pr~AVB-OP.D.ImC 2flY94 itJb 6
ATTA~ NO. 2
ORDINANCE NO. 94-
AN ORDINANCE OF ~ CITY COUNCIL OF CITY OF
TEMECULA, AMENDING SECTION NO. 18,28,A,C,(10) OF
ORDINANCE NO. 348 PERTAINING TO Tvff. TYPE OF
PAVING MATERIAL REQUIRRB FOR ACCESS TO
SECOND DWEr .T 3NG UNITS
CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY OF TEMECULA, STATE OF
CAT,rsORN~, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. City Ordin.-ce No. 90-04 adopted by reference cert~i- portion of the Non-
Codified Riverside County Ordinances, including Ordinance No. 348. Section 18.28.a.c.(10)
of Ordinance No. 348 is hereby mended to read as follows:
(lo)
Any second unit phced more th3n 150 feet from a public right-of-way shall be
required to pwvide all-weather access for emergency vehicles from a publicly
m~inmined road. Aspbaltic or concrete paving is required for all-weather access;
however, thi.~ requirement may be waived if all of the following conditions are
met:
A soils report (prepared by a licensed soft or civil engineer) is submitted
to the Department of Public Works for approval. The report shah
determine the stability of the soils at the project site and contain
recommendations for alternative mamrial types and any associated
drainage facilities that will support a 30,000 pound emergency vehicle.
The applicant records a waiver, releasing the City of Temecula of any
liability in the event that emergency vehicles cannot utiliTe the drive lane.
The City of Temecuh will not accept or msalnt~in the roadway until it has
been improved to City of Temecuh Standards as identified in the
Circulation Element of the General Plan.
Section 2. Severability. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of thi.~
Ordinance is seven~ble and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shah hold any
sentence, paragraph, or section of this ordinance to be invalid, such decisions shah not affect
the validity Of the _remsaining parts of this Ordinance.
Seaion 3. Notice of Adoption. Within 10 days after the adoption hereof, the City Clerk
of the City of Temecula shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and cause it to be posted
in at least three public places in the City.
Sectinn 4. Taking Effea. This ordinance shall take cffea 30 days after the date of its
adoption.
R:~STAFFRFI~AV~ORD.pC ~'I/94 Mb 7
Section ~. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPT~ this
day of
,199.
RON ROBHRTS
MAYOR
ATTE3T:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss
crrY OF
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temec~,l,,, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Ordinance No. 94-_ was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular
meeting of the City Council on the day of , 199_, and that ~, said
Ordinance was duly adopted and passed a regular meeting of the City Council on the __th day
of , 1994 by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCrt-~rP~[BERS:
COUNt:
COUNTERS:
lune S. Crreek, City Clerk
Scott F. Field
City Attorney
R:~I'AFFRP'I~AVB-ORD.PC 2/1~ Hb 8
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
FEBRUARY 7, 1994
R:\STAFFRPT\PAVE-ORD.CC 2/1&/9~. kLb 8
Se
EJjMiNINa nnlilllmeel0N MINtJTI:~
J~UF :C FARiNa ITa:MS
7.
DRAFT
Proposed amendment to Ordinance No. 460 to elmplify the current rules for merging
mjlatenclard parcels.
Planner David Hogan presented the staff report.
Chairman Ford opened the public headng at 7:20 P.M.
Chairman Ford suggested · defirddon of property owner be included in the ordinance
or draft the ordinance to refer to the owner of record.
Commluione Hoegland suggested a definition of owner be induded and rote the
owner is the 'dtle holder of record or all tide holders of record'.
Assistant City Attorney Grsg Diaz asked if the Commission prefers consent or nodce
of the first or second trust deed property owners.
The overall consensus of the Commission is to accept notice of additional title holders.
It we moved by Commisdonar Hcogland, seconded by Commisdoner Blair to close
the public headrig at 7:20 P.M. and Adopt Resolution No. g4- recommending that
the City Council adept an ordinance amending Section 16.7 of Ordinance No. 460
pertaining to the merger of condguous parcels.
The motion carded as follows:
AYES: 5 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Fahey, Hoegland, Salyer, Ford
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
An Ameeiklaent to I;e cl:a., He. 18.28.A.C.(10) of Of 4Olnce No. 348
Proposal to amend Ordinance No. 348 partairdng to the type of paving matodd
required for access to second dwelling units.
Planner Matthew Fagan presented the staff report.
Chairman Ford opened the public headng at 7:25 P.M.
Commialoner Hoegland questioned the legality of Sendon (B) of the amendment
regarding recordedon of a waiver.
EI,~iililin ~'qIIMISSION MINttiTle
Assistant CAW Attorney Gag Diaz aid by recording a waive against the property,
provide evidence the property owners is accepting some dsk.
Commissioner Hoegland suggested staff ask the Firs Department for their comments
regarding action (A) of the amendment. He said he feels the City should have input
regarding acceptable materials. Commissioner Hoegland suggested the City should
evaluate a couple of alternatives or guidelines for conforming to Section (A) of the
amendment. Commissioner Hoegland laid he feels the language is fine however, he
liked the previous requirement for a 28' AJC read and if you did not have the
requirement for dmt, then a second unit is not acceptable.
Principal Engineer Ray Casoy mild staff b concerned with making deign
recommendations.
Chairman Ford ex4x. e_-xe ~' concern there is no timing related to the recordellen of the
waiver against the property and suggested amending the ordinance to read "pdor to
issuence of building permit". Cheirmsn Ford added That he feels a maintenance clause
stating dw property owner ia responsible for the mmintenence of ~he readway should
be included.
It wee moved by Commisdonsr Febey, seconded by Commlakioner Blair to doe the
public headng st 7:30 P.M. and to Adopt Resolution No. 94- recommending
approval of an amendment to Section 18.28.A.C.(10) of Ordinance No. 348, with the
following changes: B. It Is the applicsnt's mspenibOity to maintain the access such
that it wgl continua to support 8 30,000 pound emergency veNcle.; C. The applicant
records a waiver against the preparty, releaing the City of Temecule of any liability
in the event that emergency vehicles cannot utilize the ddve lane, pdor to the iuuance
of building permits.
The motion carded st follows:
AYES:
4 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Fahey, Salyer, Ford
NOES: I COMMISSIONERS: Hoegland
ABSENT: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
PLANNING DIRwCTO R'S PwPOR'I'
Planning Director Gary Themhill rsperted the fo~owlng:
Kemper Development is planning to resurrect some of their dormant projects and staff
would like consensus from the Commission on holding an additional meeting on Mareh
21, 1994 to review some of ease projects. The consensus of the Commission was
to meet on March 21, 1994.
ITEM NO. 13
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAl
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning
February 22, 1994
Planning Application No. 93-0179, Amendment No. I - Second Unit Permit -
Appeal of Conditions of Approval No. 31 and 42 (requirement for the all-
weather access to the second unit)
Prepared By:
Matthew Fagan, Assistant Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 94-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA REGARDING THE APPEAL BY RAYMOND AND
ODETTE DETOBERT AND MICHELLE HAPlOT AND APPROVING
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 93-0179, AMENDMENT NO. I
BACKGROUND:
This item was originally heard by the City Council st their December 14, 1993 end was
continued until January 11, 1994. The item was continued again at this meeting, and the
applicant requested that it be brought before the City Council on the same date that an
amendment to Section No. 18.28.A.C.(10) of Ordinance No. 348 is to be heard by the City
Council (The Planning C. ommission approved an Amendment to Section 18.28.e.c.(10) of
Ordinance No. 348 by a 4-1 vote at their February 8, 1994 meeting).
Staff was directed at the January 11, 1994 Council meeting to rectify the outstanding issue
regarding a requirement for street improvement plans for the project. Public Works Staff has
discussed the issue with the applicant's representative and recommends that the following
conditions of approval be amended for the project:
Condition No. 31 shall read as follows:
In lieu of the normal requirement to prepare a set of plan and profile improvement plans as
street right-of-way documents, Public Works Staff will accept grading plans with the addition
of a centerline profile and the necessary street specifications. The plan and profile shall show
the location of existing utilities and facilities within the right-of-way as directed by the
Department of Public Works.
R:~TAPFRPT%l'79PA93.CC3 2/14/94 k~ 1
Condition No. 42 shall read as follows:
Adequate right-of-way shall be dedicated along Jeffery Heights Road and Aussie Avenue to
provide for s 60 foot full width right-of-way including a cul-de-sac at their tarmini and required
corner property line cut off in accordance with City Standards.
A. An all-weather access shall be designed by a registered Engineer and constructed to be
consistent with Section 18.28a.c.(10) of Ordinance No. 348 as amended.
B. The driveway and the access to the site shall be designed and constructed relative to the
ultimate design of Aussie Avenue or Jeffery Heights including a turn around at the terminus
as directed by the Department of Public Works.
C. The improvements shall accommodate the natural drainage course crossing the road. All
necessary permits shall be obtained from appropriate agencies; i.e. the Department of Fish and
Game, Army Corps· of Engineers, and Regional Water Quality Control Board, as deemed
necessary by the Department of Public Works.
It should be noted that if the Council adopts the Amendment to Section 18.28.a.c.(10) of
Ordinance No. 348, it shall go into effect thirty (30) days from the date of the second reading
of the Ordinance Amendment. This would require the applicant to wait until the thirty (30)
day period is over to obtain building permits.
FISCAL IMPACT
b/pne.
Attachments:
Resolution 94- - Page 3
Conditions of Approval (Planning Application No. 93-0179, Amendment No. 1 ) -
Page 7
R:~TAPPRPT~I'~gPA9~.CC3 ~1~1. ~ 2
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
RESOLUTION NO. 94-
R:~TAFIrR]~179PA93.CC3 2/10/94 Idb 3
-- ATFA~ NO. 1
I~Y-~JOLUTION NO. 94--
A RESOLUTION OF THR CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY OF
T~tECULA REGARDING THE APPEAL BY RAYMOND AND ODETTE
DEROBERT AND MIC!~JJ.R HAPIOT AND APPROVING PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. 93-0179, AMENDMENT NO. 1.
WI~EREAS, Raymond and OdeOc Deroben and Michelle Hapiot filed Planning
Application No. 93-0179 in ~ce with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning
and Subdivision Ordinance, which the City has adopted by reference;
WH~tI~AS, said Planning Application was processed in the time and manner prescribed
by State and local hw;
~, the Planning Commi.~sion considered said Planning Application on
November 1, 1993, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by hw, at which time
interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or in opposition;
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and
argmnents, ff any, of nil persons deserving to be heard, said Commission considered all facts
rehting to Planning Application No. 93-0179, Amendment No. 1;
WHRRRAS, at the conclusion of the Commls:sion hearing, the Commission approved
said Planning Application;
WHEREAS, an appeal of the Planning Commi.~sion decision for conditions of approval
pertaining to the definition of all-weather access for emergency vehicles was made in accordance
with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, and Phnning OrdinalIces, which the City has
adopted by reference;
WBRRRAS, said Appeal application was processed in the time and manner prescribed
by State and local hw;
W~'~-~,S, the City Council conducted a public hearing pertaining to said Appeal on
December 14, 1993, at which time Staff was directed to prepare an Amendment to Section No.
18.28.A.C.(10) pertaining to the definition of all-weather access for emergency vehicles; and
WHEREAS, the City Council considered said Appeal on January 11, 1994, at a duly
noticed public hearing as prescribed by hw, at which time interested persons had an opporUmity
to testify either in support or in opposition;
WHEREAS, the City Council continued said Appeal until an Amendment to Section
18.28.a.c.(10) of Ordinance No. 348 came before them;
R:~T~I79PA93.CC3 ~10/9~ klb 4
WHEREAS, the City Council considered said Appeal on January 11, 1994, at a duly
noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time interested persons had an opportunity
to testify either in support or in opposition;
WngnRJi$, punurn to the appeal, the City Council ¢onsidex~ the application De
Novo;
A. The City Council, in ~pproving of the proposed Planning Application, makes the
following findings, to wit:
2. The ~ use or action complies with all other applicable requirements
of state law and local ordinances. The pn~sed project is consistent with Ordinance No. 348.
The project meets the criteria prescribed under Section 18.28.a. (Second Unit Permit) of
Ordinance No. 348.
3. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the
public health, safety and general welfare; conforms to the logical development of the land and
is compatible with the present and future logical development of the surrounding property. The
project meets the criteria prescribed under Section 18.28.a. (Second Unit Permit) of Ordinance
No. 348. The proposal will not have an adverse effect on surrounding property, because it does
not represent a significant change to the present or planned land use of the area. The project
conforms with applicable land use and development regulations.
4. The proposed project will not have a significant impact on the environment
since the project is a Class 3 Categorical Exemption pursuant to the California Environmental
Quanty Act.
B. As conditioned pursuant to Section 4, the Planning Application proposed conforms
to the logical development of its proposed site, and is compatible with the present and future
development of the surrounding property.
Section 3. l~vironm~.~l Con~plizmce. The proposed project will not have a significant
impact on the environment since the project is a Class 3 Categorical Exemption pursuant to the
California Environmental Quality Act.
Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula City Council hereby approves
Planning Application No. 93-0179, Amendment No. 1 to construct a second dwelling unit
located at 31550 Calle Girasol and known as Assessor's Parcel No. 914-480-006 subject to the
following conditions:
A. Exhibit A, attached hereto.
R:~rAFFP, PT~I?9PA93.CC3 2/10/94 klb 5
-'- S{~tion 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPT!~ this llth day of January, 1994.
ATTBST:
RON ROBERTS
MAYOR
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SBAL]
STATE OF CALIFO~)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
crrY TaMB:ULA)
I ln~RERy CERTWf that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City
Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the llth day of January,
1994 by the following vote of the Council:
COUNTERS:
NOES:
COUNCH~IBERS:
COUNCII,IVl]~IBERS:
/UNES. GP, E[~
CITYO-n~,K
R:ISTAFFRP~179PA93.CC3 2/10/94 ]rib 6
A'I'I'ACHMENT NO. 2
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
R:~STAFFRI~179PA93.CC3 2/10/94 ]db 7
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No. 93-0179, Amendment No.1 - Second Unit Permit
Project Descdpljon: A request to construct a new 2,195 square foot dwelling unit on
a parcel which already contains an existing 1,536 square foot structure. The new unit
will become the pdmaW unit end the existing structure will become the secondary unit.
The project is located in the Rural Residential (R-R 2 1/2) zone. The project site is
located st 31550 Calla Giresol.
Assessor's Parcel No.: 914-480-006
Approval Date:
Expiration Date:
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
General Requirements
e
The use hereby permitted by this Planning application is to construct a new 2,195
square foot dwelling unit on a parcel which already contains an existing 1,536 square
foot structure· The new unit will become the primary unit and the existing structure
will become the secondary unit.
The permittee shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Temecula, its
agents, officers, and employees from any claims, action, or proceeding against the City
of Temecula or its agents, officers, or employees to attach, set aside, void, or annul,
an approval of the City of Temecula, its advisory agencies, appeal boards, or legislative
body concerning Planning Application No. 93-0179, Amendment No. I - Second Unit
Permit. The City of Temecula will promptly notify the permittee of any such claim,
action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula and will cooperate fully in the
defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the permittee of any such claim, action or
proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the permittee shall not, thereafter,
be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City of Temecula.
The second unit shall be used for family members or rental purposes only and may not
be sold as a separate unit unless the lot is subdivided pursuant to all applicable laws
and local ordinances.
The second unit shall be used as a dwelling unit only, and no businesses or home
occupations of any kind may be conducted from or in the second unit·
This approval shall be valid for five (5) years.
The project shall be consistent with Section 18.28.a of Ordinance No. 348.
The development of the premises shall conform substantially with that as shown on
the site plan marked Exhibit A, or as amended by these conditions.
R:~TAFFR~179PA93.C'C3 7/10/94 klb 8
8. Building elevations shall be in substantial conformance with that shown on Exhibit B. ~
Wood Siding: Earthenware (Frazee 5203 M)
Wood Trim: Candlewax (Frazee 4500 W)
Roof: Composition Shingle
Within Forty-Bght (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project
a
The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or
money order payable to the County Clark in the amount of Seventy-Eight Dollars
($78.00) County administrative fee to enable the City to file the Notice of
Determination required under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California
Code of Regulations Section 15075. If within such forty-eight (48) hour period the
applicant/developer has not delivered to tha Planning Department the check required
above, the approval for the project granted herein shall be voided by reason of failure
of condition.
Prior to the Issuance of Grading Permits
10.
Tho applioont shall oomply with Ordinanoo No. GC3 by paying tho foo roquirod by that
ordinanoo whioh is boaod on (tho grooo aoroogo of tho peroolo propoood for
dovolopmont), Should Ordinonoo No. £S3 bo ouporoodod by tho provioiono of e I labitot
Conaorvotion Plan prior to tho peymont of tho fooo roquirod by Ordinanoo No. (:C3, tho
opplioant shall pay tho foo rocluirod undor tho I labitat Conoorvotion Plan o~
implomontod by County ordinanoo or rooolution. (Deleted at the Planning Commission
hearing on November 1, 1993).
Prior to the Issuance of Building Permits
11.
All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use
allowed by this permit.
BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT
12.
The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions of the 1991 edition of the
Uniform Building, Plumbing and Mechanical; 1990 National Electrical Code; California
Administrative CoEle Title 24 Energy and Handicapped Regulations and the Temecula
Coda.
13. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings prior to submittal for plan review.
14.
The applicant shall provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original
signature on plans submitted for plan review.
15.
The applicant shall provide electrical plan including load calcs and panel schedule,
plumbing schematic and mechanical plan for plan review.
R:~'FAFFg. P~I'79PA93.CC3 2/10/94. Idb 9
· ~'- PUBUC WORKS DEPARTMENT
The following are the Department of Public Works Conditions of Approval for this project, and
shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All questions regarding the true
meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the appropriate staff parson of the Department
of Public Works.
It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the tentative site plan all existing and
proposed easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage courses, and their
omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and revision.
General Requirements
16.
A Grading Permit for either rough or precise (including all onsite flat work and
improvements) grading shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior
to commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained road right-
of-way.
17.
An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior
to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City
right-of-way.
18.
All improvement plans, grading plans, landscape and irrigation plans shall be
coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements
contiguous to the site.
Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits
19.
The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board.
No grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or
the project is shown to be exempt.
20. The Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies:
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board
Planning D~partment
Department of Public Works
Riverside County Health Department
Community Services District
General Telephone
Southern California Edison Company
Southern California Gas Company
21.
A Grading Plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by the
Department of Public Works. The plan shall comply with the Uniform Building Code,
Chapter 70, City Standards, and as required in these Conditions of Approval.
R:~qTAPPRPT~I79PA93.CC3 2/10/94 IrJb 10
A Soils Report prepared by a registered Soils Engineer shall be submitted to the
Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall
address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the
construction of engineered structures and pavement sections.
23.
Graded but undeveloped land shall be maintained in a weedfree condition and shall be
either planted with interim landscaping or provided with other erosion control measures
as approved by the Department of Public Works.
24.
A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the prevailing Area
Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new development. The charge is
payable to Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District prior to
issuance of any permit. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has been
already credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid.
25.
The Developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or slope easements for
offsite work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public
Works.
26.
A drainage easement shall be obtained from the affected property owners for the
release of concentrated or diverted storm flows onto the adjacent property. A copy of
the drainage easement shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for
review prior to recordation. The location of the recorded easement shall be delineated
on the precise grading plan.
27.
The Developer shall accept and properly dispose of all off-site drainage flowing onto
or through the site. In the event the Department of Public Works permits the use of
streets for drainage purposes, the provisions of Section XI of Ordinance No. 460 will
apply. Should the quantities exceed the street capacity, or use of streets be prohibited
for drainage purposes, the Developer shall provide adequate facilities as approved by
the Department of Public Works.
28.
The Developer shall protect downstream properties from damages caused by alteration
of the drainage patterns; i.e., concentration or diversion of flow. Protection shall be
provided by constructing adecluate drainage facilities, including enlarging existing
facilities or by securing a drainage easement.
29.
The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an
Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to
the subject property.
Prior to the Issuance of Encroachment Permits
30.
All necessary grading permit requirements shall have been accomplished to the
satisfaction of the Department of Public Works.
R:~qTAFFRPT~179PA93.CC3 2/10/94 ldb 11
31.
In lieu of the normal requirement to prepare a set of plan and profile improvement plans
as street right-of-way documents, Public Works Staff will accept grading plans with
the addition of a centerline profile and the necessary street specification. The plan and
profile shall show the location of existing utilities and facilities within the right-of-way
as directed by the Department of Public Works.
32.
The Developer shall construct or post security and an agreement shall be executed
guarantaeing the construction of the following public and private improvements in
conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department
of Public Works.
A. Street improvements
B. Storm drain facilities
C. Sewer and domestic water systems
33. All required fees shall be paid.
Prior to Issuance of Building Permit
34. The Developer shall receive written clearance from the following. agencies:
Riverside County Fire Department
Planning Department
Department of Public Works
35.
All necessary construction or encroachment permits have been
submitted/accomplished to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works.
36. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the Department of Public Works
37.
All building pads shall be certified by a registered Civil Engineer for location and
elevation, and the Soil Engineer shall issue e Final Soils Report addressing compaction
and site conditions.
38.
The Developer shall deposit with the Engineering Department a cash sum as
established per acre/unit as mitigation for traffic signal impact.
39.
The Developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities
imposed upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public facility
mitigation as required under the EIR/Negative Declaration for the project. The fee to
be paid shall be in the amount in effect at the time of payment of the fee. "If an interim
or final public facility mitigation fee or district has not been finally established by the
date on which the Developer requests its building permit for the project or any phase
thereof, the Developer shall execute the Agreement for payment of Public Facility fee,
a copy of which has been provided to the Developer. Concurrently, with executing
this Agreement, the Developer shall post a bond to secure payment of the Public
Facility fee. The amount of the bond shall be 02.00 per square foot, not to exceed
010,000. The Developer understands that said Agreement may require the payment
R:~fI'~I79PA93.CC3 2/10/94
of fees in excess of those now estimated (assuming benefit to the project in the
amount of such fees). By execution of this Agreement, the Developer will waive any
right to protest the provisions of this Condition, of this Agreement, the formation of
any traffic impact fee district, or the process, levy, or collection of any traffic
mitigation or traffic impact fee for this project; orovided that the Developer is not
waiving its right to protest the reasonableness of any traffic impact fee, and the
amount thereof.
Pdor to Issuance of Certification of Occupancy
40. The Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies:
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
Rancho California Water District
Eastern Municipal Water District
General Telephone
Southern California Edison
Southern California Gas
Planning Department
Department of Public Works
41.
All improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and City
standards, including but not limited to curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive
approaches, parkway trees, street lights on all interior public streets, signing, striping,
traffic signal interconnect, and traffic signals.
42.
Adequate right-of-way shall be dedicated along Jeffery Heights Road and Aussie
Avenue to provide for a 60 foot full width right-of-way including a cul-de-sac at their
termini and required corner property line cut off in accordance with City Standards.
An all-weather access shall be designed by a registered Engineer and
constructed to be consistent with Section 18.28a.c.(10) of Ordinance No. 348
as amended.
The driveway and the access to the site shall be designed and constructed
relative to the ultimate design of Aussie Avenue or Jeffery Heights including a
turn around at the terminus as directed by the Department of Public Works.
The improvements shall accommodate the natural drainage course crossing the
road. All necessary permits shall be obtained from appropriate agencies; i.e. the
Department of Fish and Game, Army Corps. of Engineers, and Regional Water
Quality Control Board, as deemed necessary by the Department of Public
Works.
43.
In the event road or off-site right-of-way are required to comply with these conditions,
such easements shall be obtained by the Developer; or, in the event the City is required
to condemn the easement or right-of-way, as provided in the Subdivision Map Act, the
Developer shall enter into an agreement with the City for the acquisition of such
easement at the Developer's cost pursuant to Government Code Section 66462.5,
which shall be at no cost to the City.
OTHER AGENCIES
44.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Rancho
California Water District transmittal dated October 14, 1993, a copy of which is
attached.
45.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Riverside County
Health Department transmittal dated October 1, 1993, a copy of which is attached.
46.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Riverside County
Fire Department transmittal dated October 25, 1993, a copy of which is attached.
R:~TAFFRP~I79PA93.CC3 2/10/94 Idb 14
Wmr
Deaf Kuibml
Preu6,n~
Jeffrey L. Minitier
Kelpis H. Daily
· ~aney K. Hughes
Csaisa F. Ko
Lisa D. Peterson
Richard D. StefTey
John F. HenniKar
C,,..eeral Mamaear
Phillip L. Forbes
Din. ru~r k,~ Finante ·
E. P. "T~b' Lemons
Dlrea,~' M' Fnk'lnt, ennl[
~enneth C. Dolly
D:rt, ct~r ,~ Operations
& .%ironschance
Perr~ R, Louek
tCe~ntt~|ler
Linda .~1. Fregoso
~)i,trsa :'~cn,ury
Jannine[L Enlistrand
& !J~nrikson
October 14, 1993
RECEIVED
0 C T 18 15 3
Mr. Matthew Fagan
City of Temecula
Planning Department
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590-3606
Water Availability
APN 914480-006, PA93-0179
Second Unit Permit
Dear Mr. Fagan:
Please be advised that the above-referenced property is located within the
boundaries of RancOo California Water District (ECWD). Water service,
therefore, would be available upon completion of financial arrangements between
RCWD and the property owner.
Water availability would be contingent upon the property owner signing an
Agency Agreement which assigns water management rights, if any, to R.C~VD.
If you have any questions, please contact Ms. Senga Doherty.
Sincerely,
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT
Steve Brannon, P.E.
Development Engineering Manager
S8:SO:eb08/F186
cc: Senga Doherty, Engineering Technician
RancOo Lalitornia Water Di,triet
TO:
FROM
RE:
County of Riverside
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
C1TY OF TEMECULA PLANNINGD~.
SECOND UNiT PEgMIT NO. PA93-0179
DATE: October 1, 1993
RECEIVED
0 CT ~ 5 1993
~ns 'd ........... ,
The Department of Environmental Health has reviewed the Second Unit Permit No. PA93-0179 and will
requirc the following items PRIOR TO BUZLDING PIAN APPROI/AL:
Adequate/satisfactory detailed soils pcrcolation testin8 in accordance with the procedures outlined in the
Riverside County Waste Disposal Booldet entitled "Waste Disposal for Individnal Homes, Commercial
2. A "will-serve" letter for potable water from the appropriate agency providing water mace.
3. Three detailed drawn to scale ( 1 "=20~ of the proposed subsurface sewage disposal system and floor
plan/plumbing schedule to ensure septic tnnk si~ing.
SM:dr
(909) 275-8980
RiVERSIDE C O UNTY
FIRE DEPARTMENT
210 Ve~..ST SAN JACIiNTO AVENUE · PERRXS, C..,%i'-YR3RNIA 99_.~70 · (909) 657-3183
October 25, 1993
TO: Pl~.~ing Department
ATTEN: Matthew Fags-
RE: PA93-0179
With respect to the conditions of approval for the above referenced
second unit permit, The Fire Deparr_ment recommends the following
fire protection measures be provided in accordance with the City of
Temecula Ordinances and/or recognized fire protection standards:
The water mains shall be a minimum of 6" diameter and shall be
capable of providing a potential fire flow of 500 GPM for 2 hour
duration at 20 PSI residual operating pressure
The required fire flow shall be available from a standard fire
hydrant (6"x4"x2 1/2") within 500 feet of the property.
The applicant/developer shall be responsible to submit written
certification from the water company noting location of the
existing fire hydrant and the existing water system is capableof
delivering 500 GPM fire flow for a 2 hour duration at 20 PSI
residual operating pressure. If a water system currently.does not
exist, the applicant/developer shall be responsible to provide
written certification that financial arrangements have been made to
provide them.
The required water system, including fire hydrants, shall be
installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any
combustible building materials-being placed on the job site.
Driveways over 150 feet in length shall have a turn around' at the
second unit, capable of accoa~t~dating fire apparatus.
Any secondunit placed more than 150 feet from any public right-of-'
way Shall be required to'provide an all-weather access for
emergency vehicles. Access shall not have an up or down grade of
more than 15%. Access will not be less than 12 feet in width
will have a vertical clearance of 13'6". Access will be free of
sharp confined turns. Access will be designed to withstand the
weight of any type of emergency vehicle. Access will have a
turning radius of 45 feet capable of accoam~odating fire apparatus.
~RE PREVE~'TF1ON DIV~ION
~ RIVE~IDE OFFIa PI..ANNING SECTION ~ INDIO OFFi~
37~ 12th Si~t, ~versi~, CA 9~01 '
(909) 27547~ · FAX (909) 3~-~5 1
79-733 C. ounu7 Club Driv~ Sui~ F, Indio, CA 92201
(619) 863-8886 · FA~ {619) 863-7072
All buildings shall be constructed with fire retardant roofing
material as described in Section 3203 of the UniformBuilding Code.
Any wood shingles or shakes shall be a Class "B" rating and shall
be approved by the fire Department prior to installation.
Street address shall be posted, in a visible location, minimum 4
inches in height, on the street side of the building with a
contrasting background.
Prior to Ehe issuance of building permits, the developer shall
deposit, with the City' of Temecula, the sum of $400.00 per unit
mitigation for fire protection impacts.
All questions regarding the meaning of ~hese conditions shall be
referred to the Fire Department Planning and engineering section.
RAYMOND H. REGIS
Chief Fire Department Planner
by~~/~/~
Laura Cabral
Fire Safety Specialist
ITEM NO.
,TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY. ATTORNEY '~
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER ,,*
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning~r//
February 22, 1994
Ordinance Amending the Land Use Code Regarding the Term of Plot Plans,
Conditional Use Permits, and Public Use Permits
Prepared By: Debbie Ubnoske
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Read by title only and introduce an Ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 94-_
=AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING THE LAND USE CODE REGARDING THE
TERM OF PLOT PLANS, CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS, AND
PUBLIC USE PERMITS.'
2. Adopt · Resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 94-
"RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE
AMENDING THE LAND USE CODE REGARDING THE TERM OF
PLOT PLANS, CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS, AND PUBLIC USE
PERMITS."
BACKGROUND
At the April 5, 1993 Planning Commission meeting, staff recommended the Commission
amend Ordinance 348 to allow for two additional one year extensions of time for Plot Plans,
Conditional Use Permits, and Public Use Permits. At this meeting, the Commission expressed
a concern relative to extending the life of permits they had never seen and requested staff
research the number of Council epproved projects which had not expired and bring it beckto
the Commission. Staff researched City approvals for the period from April 1990 to June
1990 which was the period of time the City Council acted solely to approve or deny projects.
During this period, the City Council acted on eight County transferred plot plans end no
conditional use permits or public use permits. Of the eight plot plans acted on, all have either
been constructed or have expired. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission meeting,
the Planning Commission directed staff to prepare an Ordinance providing for two additional
years to allow applicants additional time to construct their projects. Commissioner Hoegland
was opposed to such an Ordinance. He felt giving applicants an additional two years was not
in the City's best interest.
At the December 6, 1993 Planning Commission meeting, the Ordinance was presented and
approved by the Commission three to one with Commissioner Noagland in opposition.
Pursuant to prior Council direction, Sention 4 of the attached Ordinance allows permittees to
request reinstatement of expired City approved applications within six months of the date the
Council adopts this Ordinance. The reinstatement hearing will be conducted by the Planning
Director. For example, if the City had approved a conditional use permit on the date of
incorporation, December 1, 1989, the permit would have expired on November 30, 1991.
Under Section 4 of this Ordinance, the Planning Director could grant the permittee up to three
one-year extensions of time. The effect of this would be to extend the permit to November
30, 1994. If the conditional usa permit had been approved on December 1, 1990 and had
expired on November 30, 1992, the Planning Director could now grant two additional
extensions in the following years to extend it up to November 30, 1995.
Staff will contact all applicants who will be able to avail themselves of these additional time
extensions.
FISCAL IMPACT
Adoption of this Ordinance could result in a positive fiscal impact in that it will provide
businesses additional time in which to obtain funding and begin construction of their projects.
Attachments:
Resolution No. 94- - Page 3
Ordinance No. 94- - Page 6
Planning Commission Staff Report - Page 11
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
RESOLUTION NO. 94,-
RESOLUTION NO. 94-
RF.,~LUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ~OMMENDING ADOPTION OF AN
ORDINANCE AMENDING THE LAND USE CODE
REGARDING THE TERM OF PLOT PLANS,
CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS, AND PUBLIC USE
WH!~FAS, City Ordinance No. 90-04 adopted by reference certain portions of the non-
codified Riverside County Ordinances, including Ordinance No. 348 ("Land Use Code"); and
WREREAS, such regulations provide for extensions of time for plot plans, conditional
use permits, and public use permits; and
WH~:REAS, the City of Temecula wishes to provide for an additional period of time to
allow for the development of approved projects; and
WHERv-4kS, a public heating was conducted on December 6, 1993, January 25, 1994
and February 22, 1994 at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in
support or opposition; and
WHEREAS, notice of the proposed Ordinance was posted at City Hall, County Library,
Rancho California Branch, the U.S. Post Office and the Temecula Valley Chamber of
Commerce; and
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOT~LOWS:
Section 1. That the City Council of the City of Temecula hereby finds that there are no
County cases remaining that would be able to avail themselves of these additional extensions of
time.
Section 2. That the City Council of the City of Temecula hereby finds that the proposed
Ordinance providing for two additional one year extensions of time will benefit businesses in the
City of Temecula.
Section 3. That the City Council of the City of Temecula hereby finds that this
Ordinance is exempt through Section 21080 of the California Environmental Quality A~t.
Section 4. That the City Council of the City of Temecula hereby recommends adoption
of the proposed additional extension of time Ordinance. The Ordinance is incorporated into this
Resolution by this reference.
it:~STAFFRPr~,ANDUS~.CC ~/14/94 tjs 4
Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 22nd day of February, 1994.
RONA~ .r~ ROBERTS
MAYOR
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City
Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 22nd day of February,
1994 by the following vote of the Council:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNC~:
COUNTERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
/ S.
crrYcLKp, K
R:~sr,,,~Da, nL, ksDums. cc 2/14/g~ ~ [i
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
ORDINANCE NO. 94-
ORDINANCE NO
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY
OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE LAND USE CODE
REGARDING ~ TERM OF CONDITIONAL USE
PERMITS, PUBLIC USE PERMITS AND PLOT PLANS
~ CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TE~ECULA DOES HEREBY
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Seelion 1. Article XVIII, Section 18.30(f) of Riverside County Ordinance No.
348, as adopted by reference pursuant to City Ordinance No. 90-04, and as amended pursuant
to City Ordinance No. 91-09, is hereby amended to read as follows:
"f. APPROVED PERIOD. The approval of a plot plan shah be valid for a
period of two years from its effective date within which time the construction
authorized must be substantially begun or the occupancy authorized be in use;
otherwise, the approval shall be void and of no further effect.
Notwithstanding the faregoing, the permittee may, prior to the expiration of the
plot plan, apply for up to three (3), one (1) year extensions of time in which to
use the plot plan. Each extension of time shah be granted in one (1) year
increments only.
An application for an extension of time shall be made to the Phnning Director,
on forms provided by the Phnning DeparUnent and shah be filed with the
Plnnning Department, accompanied by the approp, late filing fee. Within thirty
(30) days following the filing of an application for an extension of time, the
Planning Director may approve, conditionally approve or deny the application.
An extension of time may be granted by the Phnning Director only upon a
determinntion that the propcity and use are consistent with the General Plan,
Land Use Ordinance, and all other City Ordinances and regulations. ff an
extension is granted, the total time allowed for use of the approval shah not
exceed n period of five (5) years, calculated from the effective date of the
The term "use" shall mean the beginning of a substantial con~on of the use
that is authorized, which construction must thereafter be pursued diligen~y to
completion, or the actual occupancy of existing buildings or land under terms of
the authorized use. The effective date of a plot plan shall be deln'mined pursuant
to Section 18.26 of this Ordinance.'
Section 2. Article XVHI, Section 18.28(0 of Ordinance No. 348, as adopted by
reference pursuant to City Ordinance No. 90-04, is hereby amended to read as follows:
"e. APPROVPr~ PERIOD. The approval of a conditional use permit shah be
valid for a period of two years from its effective date within which time the
eonstruetion authorized must be substnvtlnlly. begun or the occupancy authorized
be in use; otherwise, the approval shall be void and of no flirther effect.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the permittee may, prior to the expiration of the
conditional use permit, apply for up to three (3), one (1) year extensions of time
in which to use the plot plan. ~-qch extension of time shah be granted in one (1)
year increments only.
An application for an extension of time shah be made to the Planning Director,
on forms provided by the Planning Depamnent and shall be filed with the
Planning Department, accompanied by the appropriate filing fee. Within thirty
(30) days following the filing of an application for an exUmsion of time, the
Phnning Director my approve, conditionally approve or deny the application.
An extension of time may be granted by the Planning Director only upon a
determination that the pwpeny and use are consistent with the General Phn,
Land Use Ordinance, and all other City Ordinances and reguhtions. If an
extension is granted, the total time allowed for use of the approval shall not
exceed a period of five (5) years, calculated from the effective date of the
The term "use" shall mean the beginning of a substantial construction of the use
that is auth~, which construction must thereaf~ be pursued diligently to
completion, or the actual occupancy of existing buildings or land under terms of
the authoxjzBt use. The effective date of a conditional use permit shall be
determined pursuant to Section 18.26 of this Ordinance."
Section 3. Article XVHI, Section 18.29(e) of Ordinance No. 348, as adopted b.y
reference pursuant to City Ordinance No. 9004, is hereby mended to x~td as follows:
"e. APPROVPr~ PERIOD. The approval of a public use permit shall be valid
for a period of two years from its effective date within which time the
construction authm-iz~! must be substantially begun or the occupancy authorized
be in use; otherwise, the approval shah be void and of no further effect.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the permittee may, prior to the expiration of the
public use permit, apply for up to three (3), one (1) year extensions of time in
which to use the plot plan. Each extension of time shall be granted in one (1)
year increments only.
An application for an extension of time shall be made to the Planning Director,
on forms provided by the Planning ~ent and shall be filed with the
Planning Department, accompanied by the appropriate filing fee. Within thirty
(30) days following the filing of an application for an ~xtension of time, the
Planning Director may approve, conditionally approve or deny the application.
An extension of time may be granted by the Planning Director only ulxm a
dete~on that the property and use are consistent with the General Plan,
Land Use Ordinance, and all other City Ordinances and regulations. If an
extension is granted, the total time allowed for use of the approval shall not
exceed a period of five (5) years, calculated from the effective date of the
The term "use" shall mean the beginning of a substantial consreaction of the use
that is authorized, which construction must thereafar be pursued diligently to
completion, or the actual occupancy of existin__g buildings or land under terms of
the authorized use. The effective date of a public use pennit shall be determined
pursuant to Section 18.26 of this Ordinance."
Section 4. Notwithstanding the above, any plot plan, conditional use permit or
public use permit which the City approved since incorporation and which has expired, may be
reinstated pursuant to the procedure set forth above. In order to reinstate any such permit, the
permittee must make an application to reinstate within 180 days of the effective date of this
Section $. Severability. ff any provisions of this Ordinance or the application
thereof to any period or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other
provisions or applications, and to this end, the provisions of this Ordinance are declared to be
severable.
Section 6. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after
its passage. The City Clerk shah catify to the adoption of this Ordinance. The City Clerk shall
publish a summary of this Oldinance and a certified copy of the full text of thig Ordinance shall
be posted in the office of the City Clerk at least five days prior to the adoption of this
Ordinance. Within 15 days from adoption of thig Ordinance, the City Clerk shall publish a
summary of this Ordinance, together with the names of the Councilmembers voting for and
against the Ordinance, and pest the same in the office of the City Clerk.
ATTEST:
Ronald Roberts, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
R:~rAFRFrU.ANDUSB. CC ~IS/9~ ~ 9
STATE OF CAY IFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )
CITY OF ~ULA )
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecuh, California, do hereby
certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 9~._ was duly introduced and phced upon its first
reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the day of , 1994, and that
thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a reg~l_s_r meeting of the City Council
of the City of Temecula on the __ day of , 1994, by the following roll call vote:
COUNCn-MEMB~:
NOES:
COUNCU~W,mMBERS:
COUNCIl. MISfitS, S:
R:~sr~usa. cc ~71sN4 ~,
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Planning Commission
'Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning~''~'
December 6, 1993
Ordinance Amending the Land Use Code Regarding the Term of Plot Plans.
Conditional Use Permil~., and Public Use Permits
Prepared by: Dabble Ubnoske
RECOMMENDATION:
RECOMMEND Adopting Resolution 93-
adoption of an Ordinance emitled:
recommending
"AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING THE LAND USE CODE REGARDING THE
TERM OF PLOT PLANS, CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS, AND
PUBLIC USE PERMITS."
BACKGROUND
At the April 5, 1993 Planning Commission Meeting, staff recommended fiat me Commission
amend Ordinance 348 to allow for two additional one year extensions of time. Some
concerns were expressed by the Commission at the meeting relative to extending the life of
projects the Commission had never seen.
Staff researched Cih' approvals for the period from April 1990 to June 1990 which was the
period of time the City Council acted solely to approve or deny projects. During this period,
the CiW Council acted on eight County transferred plot plans. No conditional use or public
use permits were acted on. Of the eight plot plans acted on, all have eitlqer been constructed
or have expired.
At the conclusion of the Planning Commission Meeting, the Planning Commission directed
staff to prepare an Ordinance providing for two additional years to allow applicants additional
time to construct their projects. Commissioner Hoagland was opposed to such an Ordinance.
He fert giving applicants an additional two years was not in the City's best interests.
DISCUSSION
It is staff's opinion that the five year approval process would benafit businesses by providing
them additional time in which to optain funding and begin construction, It is further ataff's
opinion that there are no cases remaining from the County which would be able tO avai!
themselves of this additional time,
Section 4 of me attached Ordinance allows permittees to re{luest reinstatemere of expired
City approved applications within six months of me date the Council adopts this Ordinance.
The minatatemem hearing will be conducted by the Planning Director, For example, if the City
had approved a conditional use permit on the date of incorporation, December 1, .1989, the
permit would have expired on November 30, 1991, Under Section 4 of this Ordinance, the
Planning Director could gram the permmee up to three one-year extensions of time, The
effect of this would be to extend the permit to November 30, 1994, If the conditional use
permit had been approved on December 1, 1990 and had expired on November 30, 1992, the
Planning Director could now gram one extension at this time to extend the. permit to
November 30, 1993, and then gram two additional extensions in the following--years to
extend it up to November 30, 1995, -..
ENVIRONMENTAL D~INATION
Adoption of this Ordinance is exempt ~qroUgh Section 21080 of the Califomia Environmental
Quality Act,
Attachments
Resolution No, 93~- Blue Page 3
Ordinance No. 9~__.- Blue Page 6
Iq:~JT&ImR~ 11 ~ hie 2
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
RF. SOL~ITION NO. ~
p~'-~OLETION OFTre;'- PLANNING COlVlM'~.~SION OF T~F.
CITY OF TEM~CULA P,,ECO~ING ~ CITY
COUNCIL ADO Fr. AN ORDINANCE ~iNG ~
LAND USE CODE REGARDING THX TEEM OF PLOT
PLANS, CONDrrIONAL USE FERMrrS, AND PUBLIC USE
w s-. ,.:~'-4.S, City Oxdl,',=-,'.e No. 90-04 adopied by rdex'ence __~',,,_~,, portions of the non-.
cod. ffled Riverside County Ordln=n,-es, indutll-.~ Ordin=,~ce No. 348 C'r =,~d Use Code"); and
WH~:~,~iS, such xegulations provide for ex~-~ons of time for plot plans, conditional
use pcnniu, and public use permits; and
WH~:~-4~, the City of Temecula wishes to provide for an additional period of time to
allow for the development of approved projects; and
WRv~',4S, a public hearing was conducted on December 6, 1993, at which time
interested persons had an oppomn~ to testify either in support or ol~poskion; and
WW~R~'.A.S, notice of the pwpos~! Ordln-nc~ was posted at City Ft-n, County Library,
"ncho Cniiiornia Branch, the U.S. Post Office and the Temecula Valley Chamber of
_jmmcrcc; and
NOW, 'rHK~:~ORE, ~ PLANNING COMI~-~SION OF Tm~. CITY OF
TEvEECULA DOES RESOLVE, DEI'EKMINE AND ORDER AS FO! LOWS:
Section 1. That the planning Cowmk-~ion of the City of Temecula ber~by finds that
there ar~ no County cases rem~inin~ that would be able to avail themselves of these additional
extensions of time.
Section 2. That the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula hereby finds that the
proposed Ordinance providing for two additional one year extensions of time wffi benefit
businesses in the City of Temeaxla.
Section 3. That the Planning Commk~ion of the City of Temecula hereby finds that this
Ordinance is exempt through Section 21080 of the r'=fifonm Environmental Q,,=Hty Act.
Seaion 4. That the Planning Commksion of the City of Temecula ~ recommends
to the City Council adoption of the proposed additional enension of time Ordi-=n~. The
Ordinance is incorponmd into thk Re,~lution by thk zeference and marked Exhibit "A" and
dar~l December 6, 1993, for identification.
R:~.$~'TAIq:alIPI'%LANDUSF..F~ I1,~0j13 Idi 4.
Section 5. PASSED, .a. PPRO~ AND ADOFI'ED ibis (r,.b dsy of Decmnber, 1993.
S'i.=v.r_,l F. FORD
CItAIRM. AN
I ~Y f~at'x~u''xr thsu ~z'foxe-s°in~ P,~so~ was duly adoprod by ~hc Planning
Commi-~,don of ~he City of Teme~d~ sX a ~ mee~iv,~ fizl~of, held on ~ 6~h day of
December, 1993 by
AYES:
NOF, S:
'ABSIHqT:
~G COMMISSION*ERS:
PLANNING COMMISSION]~RS:
PLANNING COMMISSION]i:RS:
G~Y~ORNI~-
SECREtlY
11;29/93 idb 5
ATFACHMENT N0.2
ORDINANCE NO. 93-
ORDINANCE NO 93-_
AN ORDINANCE OF ~ CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY
OF ~ ~ING TKE LAND IJ~ CODE
REGARDING ~ ~ OF CONDITIONAL USE
PERMr~, PUBLIC EHE PERMI~ AND FLOT ~
~ ~ COUNCIL OF Tsr~, crr~ OF ~ DOES m~-~y
ORDA.I~ AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. ~ XVIII, Seezion 18.30(f) of Riverside County Oviin-,,ce No.
348, as adopted by r~fc, e~c~ punuant to City Ova-nee No. 90-04, and as =rnefi,i~d pursuant
to City .Ordi-:nce No. 91439, is bereby .nmemtied W zad as follows:
"f. APPROVED ~OD. The appzova! of a plot plan shall be valid for a
period of two yeazs from its effeclive date wizhin which rime the consmxction
authoxized must be s,,bs,~,n~my begun or the occ~,ncy mnhorized be in use;
Notwith-~malnE the fcn~eoiug. the F',' ...;.ec may, In'ior w the expiredon of fine
plot plan, apply for. up m three f3), one (1) year exumsions of time in which m
use the plot plan. ~.ach r, rre~ of rifle shaIl be gmzned in one (1) year
incr=men~ only.
An appliu/ion for an exrgnsion of ~ne. shall be made w fine Planning Dirr. ctor,
on forms provided by the 1D|'nrrin_~ ~e~ ~ Sba~ be filed with fine
planning ~ accoml,~l~ied by the ~al~y, uyx~te ffi~_v fee. W~fhin thirty
(30) days following fine ffilng of an appLk:adon for an c/xen-~inn of time, fine
Planning Director my approve, conditionaIly alvpxove or deny fine application.
· An extension of time may be granted by fine Planning ~ only upon a
deterwin~rion that the l.,,ol/-a,y and use are con~-~.~,~ with the General Plan,
~,xd Use Or~in=nce, and all other City Or~nces and xzgulations. If an
extension is gnnu~, the total time aIlowed for use of the appwv-al shall not
exceed a period of five (5') years, c~n=,ed from the effective date of the
The ~ "use' sbaJ1 mean the beg; .... ;hE of a subsUurrl,,1 consu'ucdon of fine use
fina~ is authorized, which c. onsm~on mus~ ~ be trm'sued dilig~gly ro
comphnion, or the acnual oc'~:,mcy of ~ri~ing b:,~rllnF or land under terms of
fine aufino~zcd use. The effective daze of a plot plan shall be deu~...;.,r4 pursuant
w Section 18,26 of ~hi.~ Ofrllr~nr,~,"
R:~%~..STA~NDI.~E.F~ 11/21/33 klb 7
Section 2. Article XVI]X, Seaion l 8.28(f) of Ord~nce No. 348, as ~dopr~:!
r~f~rcnc= purF,,n~ w City Ordizauc~ No. 90-04, is hereby amended to read as follows:
valid for a p~iod of two y~ms from ~ dr~ive da~ wi~hln which dine the
consn-uaion sutoriz~ 'mus~ be subs~,,~ny b~,un or'tbe occupan:y anthoriz~
be in u.~; odzrwiz, dz zppwval shall be void and of no funh~
Notw~-~nd~nE the f~, the pe,,.,~t*~ may, prior w the expinfion of the
condiionnl use pezmit, apply for up w three (3), one (1) year ex~ensious of drnc
in which to use the plot plan. Eacli 6xlension of lime shml] be ~ranted in one (1)
year inc=emems only.
An application for an ean~n-~ion of ~ ~,.~n be un=ri~- m the tnmnnln~ Direaor,
on forms ~ by the pi,n~i%~ Depamnen~ and ,h=n be filed with the
l~=nn~ng Deparm~un, accomyanied by dz si,p,~p,is~ ~ni,,g fee. Within thirty
(30) days following the f[lln_~ of all spplicmton for an exlension of lime, the
Pl=~mh~L ~ may sppwv~, ~y sppmve or deny the applicslion.
An e~-~e~cm of time may be ~-~nVH by the p}gnn~n~ ~ only upon a
T~qd Use Oxd~ngn~, and all other ~xt70x~nc~s and x~la~ons. I~ an
exce~l · period of five (~ yes.~, c~lc~l~red fwm r~ eftcalve dar~ of the
approval.
The term 'use' shall mean the beglnnlnE of a subsmznia] consmwtion of the use
thax is authorized, which consrnaion mus~ tbercm~r be pursued a~igently w
completion, or the acnal occupancy of e:ri~nE bv~riln~ or ]and under rgrms of
the authorized use. The effective daze of a condidonnl use permit shall be
d~rmined pursuam w Seaion 18.26 of this Ordinance.'
"e. APPROVED PERIOD. The approval of a public use permit sb:n be valid
for a period 6f two ycan from its effeclive da~ within which time the
consms~on authorized must be subsmrnlally begun or the occupancy authorized
bein use; ~herwise, tbcappzoval sba]I be void and of no fur, her~
NOtwith~nrGnE the fo,~soiug, the permince may, prior w the e~piraion of the
public use permit, apply for up to thxee (3), one (1) year ex~s~ of lime in
which w use the plo~ p!~n. Each e~n.~ion of time sh:;ll be graftted in one (1)
year increments only.
An applicaxiou for an e~xxen-',,ion of time shall be n.,,,,.i~ to the p1,nning l:~,
on forms provided by the Pl,,nning l:)~lnX and shall be filed with.
p!nefllng Depamnent, accompanied by the ayyxOpL.~Xe filing fee. Within ~
R:~IS~TA~I~ 11/2b~J3 klb 8
(30) days foliowin2 the ~lin2 of an applicaxion for an erietalon of dmc, the
p~,,m~n~ ~ my appxove, con,4iHonally appxove or deny the applicaxion.
An cnenxion of time may be rained by the p~o,,,,i... Dix=ct~- only upon a
T ~nnrl TJ.~ C)~nnnc'~, 11~ ~11 ~ C::j~'y C)z'rl~nnc'~s zl~ l'~L~Txln~On.~. ~
extension is 2umed, the wml time allowed for use'of the approval shall noc
cxceed a pcxiod of five (5') years, c~lc,,i,,ed from the effective date of thc
The tam "use' 'shall mean the ~ng of a subsxanfial conm'uction c~f the use
that is axxxhm:ized, which consnucxion must tht.,,.a.r~-r bc punucd fmi~=~x. ly w
complexion, or the acxml oca~ncy of '~nE b~rjldlngS or hnd under ternis of
the authox~ed use. The effective date ~f a public use penn/t shall be
pureant to Section 18.26 of ~ix Ord~nnn~c.'
Section 4. NOtwith-~ndlnE the abovc, any plot plan, conditional use permit or
public use pcnnit which the CiW q~wed since inco,~,~,;on and which has expired, may be
r~insmted pursuant to the procedure set forth above. In order to x~jn-~te any such pertnit, the
permittee must make an q3plitmxion to x~n.~r=~ within 1~ days af the effective dam of this
Ordinance.
Section S. Severehilly. ff any provisions of ~-~ Orfl~=n~e or ~ ~~on
· c~f wny ~ or ~,m~n~ h ~ ~d, ~ ~~ ~ not ~ o~
pwvisions or ~m~, ~d w thi~ ~d, ~c pw~ d ~ ~~ ~ ~ w ~
~vcmblc.
~:~'~'TA~PC: 11/29J93 Idle 9
Section 6. This OrrJir~n~ shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after
its passage. The ~ Clerk: _.h:11 cetd~ tO the adoptlop of ttlb Orrih',2nre add cause copies Of
this Ordin~ce to be posted and peb.-.hed as mqttitmt by law.
A'IuJ~'J.':
June S. Gteek, C..by C3=k
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALn:O~ )
coT. n, rrY OF ~E )
CrrYOFTSMr:C'In-A )
I, June S. GteeJc, City Clerk of the City of Ternecho., Ca/ifom~ do hereby
ce~if'y that the fo~go~ng Otdiw. nCe No. 93-_ was duly intwduced and placed upon its first
reading at 'a regular meeting.of the City Council on the day of , 1993, and that
thel'~tfl~, said Ordi~senCe ~ dl~ ~ ~ pl.~sed ~t a ~ meew~g of the City Collnc:il
of the City of Temecuh on the__ day of ,1993, by the fonowing mn call vote:
COUNcTr-MEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCTT-MEM3ERS:
COUNTERS:
ITEM NO.
15
/xT~PROV/xT.
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
Mary Jane McLarney, Finance Officer
February 22, 1994
Establishment of a Vehicle Impound Cost Recovery Fee
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 94-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ESTABUSHING A VEHICLE IMPOUND COST
RECOVERY FEE
DISCUSSION: Section 22651 of the Califomia Vehicle Code authorizes the removal or
tow of a vehicle by a police officer. The Temecula Police Department impounded
approximately 1300 vehicles during the period of January 1,1993 through October 1 O, 1993.
The towed vehicles account for traffic violations; driver's arrested for various criminal
offenses, and vehicles towed for miscellaneous perking violations. The tow and subsequent
release of a vehicle involves completion of an impound form; issuance of a case number;
calling and waiting for the tow; data entry of vehicle information onto police and state
computer systems; preparation of tow notices to the registered and legal owners of the
vehicle; verification of valid driver's license, vehicle registration and ownership, and/or consent
of owner for another person to operate the vehicle prior to release; preparation of the release
and follow-up report; end verification of tow release.
Effective January 1, 1994, cities are specifically authorized to charge fees to cover the
administrative costs relating to the removal, impound, storage or release of impounded
vehicles. AB 481, Chapter 614 Statutes 1993, added Section 22850.5 to the Vehicle Code
which specifically authorizes the charging of these fees as long as the charges are reasonably
and directly related to the provision of the service. However, the City of Temecula des not
currently have a process for recovering these costs. The implementation of an administrative
fee, which corresponds to the costs of the service, provides a cost recovery mechanism.
The tow and release procedure requires administrative support from police officers,
communications operators and public safety clerks. The average accumulated time spent on
the tow and release is one hour. Administrative cost recovery is recommended for the
following four circumstances in which a vehicle would be towed:
When · vehicle is perked or left standing upon a highway for 72 or more hours
in videtion of a local ordinance authorizing removal and after adequate warning
has been posted on the vehicle.
When a vehicle is found upon a highway, any public lands, or an off-street
parking facility with a registration expiration date in excess of one year before
the date it is found.
Ce
When an officer issues the driver of · vehicle a notice to appear for being
unlicenssd or driving with · suspended license and there is no passenger in the
vehicle who has a valid driver's license and authorization to operate the vehicle.
When an officer arrests any pereon driving or in control of a vehicle for an
alleged offense and the officer is, by this cede or other law, required or
permitted to take, and does take, the person into custody.
It should be noted that, Section 22852 of the Vehicle Cede provides the registered and legal
owners of a towed vehicle the opportunity for · hearing to determine the validity of the
vehicle storage resulting from the tow. If reasonable grounds are not established in the
hearing, the Police Department is responsible for the administrative fee and tow charge.
Currently, the owner of an impounded vehicle must have current registration, no outstanding
parking citations, and a valid driver's license, prior to release. The administrative fee would
be imposed prior to release. The fee would be collected at the same time that other
outstanding charges are satisfied in conjunction with release of the vehicle.
It is proposed that the City of Temecula impose a e45 fee to cover the administrative costs
of impounding a vehicle. The fee would only be assessed on those vehicles whose owners
had some degree of negligence. The City would reserve the right to waive the fee due to
extenuating circumstances, such as the towing of a disabled vehicle.
FISCAL IMPACT: A conservative estimate of the projected revenue is $45,000,
based upon 1,000 impounded vehicles per year.
RESOLUTION NO. 94-
A IIE~~ON OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TE~ECULA EST~,nt-t,~m~TG A VEHICLE IMPOUND COST
RECOVERY FEE
WHEREAS, the Riverside County Sheziff's Depamnent, sting u the Temec,,is Police
Deparunent i,n~mnds or stores numerous mi various vehicles from highways, public property, or private
property, in the City of Tesneeula during the nomml course of duty; and
WHEREAS, the Riverside County Sheriff's DepsUas2t sting ss the Teme~ds Police
Depamaen~ i,mpounds or storm vehicles pursusnt ~o its suthority under Csliforah Vehicle Code secfiom
226.S0 through 22669; and
WItEREAS, Vehicle Code Section 22850.5 added by Assembly bill 481, Chapter 614
Statutes of 1993, became effective lamsy 1, 1994, specifically attthorizing cities by ordinance or
resolution to establish an adminisi~ai~ve charge relating to the removal, im!~.und, storage, or release or
vehicles; and
WHEREAS, stolen vehicle vic~m-~ should be exetnpt from service fees for im,notindment
and release of stolen vehicles; and
WHEREAS, situations may arise that warrant the exercise of prudent discretion ID forego
or excuse the proposed service fee.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CrFY OF TBMECULA DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Pursuant W California Vehicle Code Section 22850.5, that the fee for this
service charge shall be Forty-Five Dollars ($45.00) and fee shah be effective upon the adoption of this
Resolution.
Section 2. That victira~ of stolen vehicles shall be exempt from paying said service fees
when their vehicles are released from impound.
Section 3. That the Riverside County SherifFs Depamnent acting as the Temecula Police
Department may in the exercise of its discretion forego or excuse the service fee when deemed
appropriate.
Section 4. That the City Manager is hereby amhorized to review and adjust said fee
annually or as costs of services increase.
Section S. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of ,1994.
Ronald H. ~, Mayor
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF ~ORNIA)
COUNTY OF ~E) SS
crrv
I, tune S. Greek City Cleat of the City of Temeade, California, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Resolution 94-__ was duly ~ at a reSular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Temecula on the 22nd day of February, 1994, by the innowing mn can vom:
COUNCILiiEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMt~ER3:
lune S. Greek, City Clerk
-ITEM 16
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning~;'~''
February 22, 1994
Amendment to Ordinance 348 to add a new section providing regulations to
allow for a reduction in square footage to approved residential subdivisions
RECOMMENDATION:
Direct staff to prepare an Urgency Ordinance amending
Ordinance 348 by adding a new section providing regulations to
allow for a reduction of square footage and changes to elevations
to approved residential subdivisions.
BACKGROUND
In the last month, there have been a number of proposals to downsize previously approved
residential subdivisions. Coincidentally, the Planning Department has received numerous
phone calls from property owners concerned about the impact these smaller homes may have
on their property values. Currently, Ordinance 348 has no provisions for staff to regulate
changes to approved subdivisions, with the exception of R-2 subdivisions. While staff
recognizes the current economic climate and it's effect on the development communities
efforts to market larger homes, we also recognize the potential impacts on existing homes.
Staff feels a "downsizing" Ordinance may be a tool by which staff can assure that the new,
smaller product types are compatible with existing residential units.
FISCAL IMPACT
None
Attachments:
R:~rAFI;]Le'r~DOWNS]ZE 2/3/94 Idb 1
ITEM
17
~PPROV~T.
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
Jim Wright
CFD Division Chief
February 22, 1994
Consideration of Recommendation
Services
Regarding County Ambulance
PREPARED BY: City Clerk June S. Greek
RECOMMENDATION: Support the County of Riverside pursuing ambulance services
through the competitive bid process.
BACKGROUND:
you under separate cover.
JSG
The staff will finalize a staff report on this item and forward it to
ITEM NO. 18
~PPROVAT.
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
City Manager/City Council
FROM:
Scott F. Field
City Attorney
DATE:
February 22, 1994
SUBJECT:
Specific Plan No. 164, Amendment No. 2 (PA93-0145) Roripaugh
PREPARED BY:
City Clerk June S. Greek
RECOMMENDATION:
Re-introduce an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 94.-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ADOPTING LAND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 164,
LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF NICOLAS ROAD AND NORTH
GENERAL KEARNY ROAD
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 94-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ADOPTING SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 164, AMENDMENT NO. 2, (PLANNING
APPLICATION 930145), LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF
NICOLAS ROAD AND NORTH GENERAL KEARNY ROAD SO AS TO CHANGE
"THE ZONING' FOR PLANNING AREA 7 FROM VERY HIGH RESIDENTIAL (20
DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), TO HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (12 DWELLING
UNITS PER ACRE), TO ADD A THREE (3) ACRE PARK TO PLANNING AREA 7,
TO ADJUST THE BOUNDARIES BETWEEN PLANNING AREAS 7, 8 AND 9,
AND REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 93-07
City Council Agenda Report
Page Two
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 94-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 27827 (PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. 93-0144) LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF NICOLAS ROAD
AND NORTH GENERAL KEARNY ROAD SO AS TO CREATE A 162 SINGLE
FAMILY LOT SUBDIVISION PLUS A THREE (3) ACRE LOT FOR A PUBLIC PARK
WITHIN SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 167, PLANNING AREA NO. 7 AND REPEALING
RESOLUTION NO. 94-08
BACKGROUND:
separate cover.
Staff will finalize e staff report on this item end forward it to you under
swj
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
City Council/City Manager
FROM:
Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning
DATE:
February 22, 1994
SUBJECT: Specific Plan No. 164, Amendment No. 2 (PA93-0145) Roripaugh
PREPARED BY:
Saied Naaseh, Associate Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council:
1. Read by title only and re-introduce an Ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 94-_
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ADOPTING LAND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
FOR SPECIRC PLAN NO. 164, LOCATED ON THE
NORTHWEST CORNER OF NICOLAS ROAD AND NORTH
GENERAL KEARNY ROAD
2. Adopt a Resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 94-._
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULAAPPROVING SPECIRC PLAN NO. 194,
AMENDMENT NO. 2 (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 93-0145)
LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF NICOLAS ROAD
AND NORTH GENERAL KEARNY ROAD, CHANGING THE
ZONING FOR PLANNING AREA 7 FROM VERY HIGH DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL (20 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO HIGH
DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (12 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE),
ADDING A THREE (3) ACRE PARK TO PLANNING AREA 7,
ADJUSTING THE BOUNDARIES BETWEEN PLANNING AREAS
7, 8, AND 9, AND REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 94-07
R:~TAFFItPT~I45PA93.CC6 2/IN94 Idb 1
3. Adopt a Resolution entitled:
RF~OLUTION NO. 94-_
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 27827
(PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 93-0144) LOCATED ON THE
NORTHWEST CORNER OF NICOLAS ROAD AND NORTH
GENERAL KEARNY ROAD, CREATING A 162 SINGLE FAMILY
LOT SUBDIVISION PLUS A THREE (3) ACRE LOT FOR A
PUBLIC PARK WITHIN SPECIRC PLAN NO. 164, PLANNING
AREA NO. 7, AND REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 9408.
BACKGROUND:
The City Council completed the public hearing process on Amendment No. 2 to Specific
Plan No. 164 (Roripeugh) on January 25, 1994. At that meeting, the City Council made
various changes to the Specific Plan Amendment, including determining that Planning Area
8 remain Office (i.e., office with limited commercial uses). However, because the General
Plan designation for planning Area 8 was a medium density residential, it was Staff's
recommendation that the property be rezoned to low-density residential as a "holding"
zone. A General Plan amendment would then be processed to change the land use
designation of Planning Area 8 to Professional Office and the property would then be
rezoned to Office after the General Plan Amendment was complete.
At the conclusion of the hearing, Council introduced an Ordinance and adopted a
Resolution to approve the Specific Plan Amendment. The Council also adopted a
Resolution to approve the Tentative Tract Map for Planning Area 7. Finally, the Council
directed that the City and Roripaugh enter into a Memorandum of Understanding providing
that the City would initiate and Roripaugh would support a General Plan Amendment for
Planning Area No. 8 to redesignate it as a Professional Office, and that Roripaugh would
process a Specific Plan Amendment to reflect this General Plan revision.
DISCUSSION:
After further consideration end discussion with the applicant, Staff has concluded that
rather than amending Planning Area 8 from Office to Low Density Residential, and then
amending it back to Office, it would be preferable to take no action regarding Planning
Area 8. This would result in the zoning remaining Office. The City would then process a
General Plan Amendment to revise the Land Use Designation from Medium Density
Residential to Professional Office.
Accordingly, it is necessary for the Council to reintroduce a new Ordinance reflecting this
change. In addition, there were other revisions made at the City Council hearing to the
Resolutions approving the Specific Plan and approving the Tentative Tract Map that were
not reflected in the Resolutions which were adopted. Consequently, it is requested that
the Council adopt new resolutions to incorporate all the changes made at the January 25,
1994 City Council hearing.
R:~TAImlm!PI~i4~PA93.CC6 2/1~94 ldb 2
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Ordinance No. 94-_- Page 4
2. Resolution No. 94-_- Page 17
3. Resolution No. 94-_- Page 21
R:~STAFFRP~I4~PA93.CC6 2~1b~4 Idb 3
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
ORDINANCE NO. 94.-
R:~TAFFB~'~I4SPA93.CC6 2/INN Idb 4
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
ORDINANCE NO. 94-_
AN ORDINANCE OF ~ CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY OF
T~!ECULA ADOPTING IAND DEVn O~ STANDARDS
FOR SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 164, LOCATED ON THr.
NOR'lIIWi~qT CORNER OF NICOLAS ROAD AND NORTH
GENERAL K~.4d/NY ROAD
CITY COUNCIL OF THF~ CITY OF 'rD/IECI_I~, STATE OF
C~LWO~, DOES ORDAIN AS FOllOWS:
Section 1. The official zoning map of the City of Temecula, entitled
"Temecula/Rancho California Area" as adopted pursuant to Section 34 of Ordinance No. 90-
04, is amended as shown which map is w~_t~- a part of this ordinance.
Section 2. Article X'VIIa of Ordinance No. 348, as adopted by reference pursuant to
Ordinance 9004, is mended by n_d_dipg thereto a Ile-w Section 17.46 to read as follows:
Section 17.46 SP ZONE REQ~, AND STANDARDS FOR SPECIFIC PLAN
NO. 164.
a. Planning~ Area 1.
(1) The uses permitted in Planning Area I of Specific Plan No. 164 shah be the
same as those uses permitted in Article VI, Section 6.1 of Ordinance No. 348.
(2) The developmoat standards for Planning Area I of Specific Plan No. 164 shah
be the same as those standards identified in Article VI, Section 6.2 of Ordinance no. 348,
except that the development standards set froth in Article VI, Section 6.2(a), Co), (c), (d),
and (e)(1), (2), and (3) shall be deleted and replaced by the following:
A. Bulkling height shall not exceed two stories, with a maximum height of
thirty-five feet (35').
B. Lot area shall be not less than ten thousand (10,000) square feet. The
minimum lot area shall be determined by excluding that portion of a lot that is used solely
for access to the pertion of a lot used as a building site.
C. The minimum average width of that pertion of a lot to be used as a
building site shah be seventy feet (70') with a minimum average depth of one hundred feet
(100'). That portion of a lot used for access on "flag" lots shall have a minimum width of
twenty feet (20').
D. The minim.m frontage of a lot shall be seventy feet GO'), except that
lots fronting on knuckles or cul-de-sacs may have a minimum frontage ofthirty feet (30').
R:~qTAFFRP~I4~PA93.CC6 2/18/94
E. The front yard shall be not less than twenty-five feet (25'), measured
from the existing street line or from any future street line as shown in any Specific Plan of
Highways, whichever is nearer the proposed ~.
F. Side yards on interior and through lots shall be not less than ten feet
(10'). Side yards on corner and reverse comer lots shall be not less than twenty-five feet
(25') from the existing street line or from any future street line as shown on any Specific
Phn of Highways, whichever is nearer the proposed smumn~, upon which the main building
sides, except that where the lot is less than fifty feet (50') wide the yard need not exceed
twenty percent (20%) of the width of the lot.
G. The rear yard shall not be less than twenty feet (20').
In addition, the following standards shall also apply:
AA. No lot shall have more than twenty-five percent (25 % ) of its net area
covered by Buildings or structures.
the curb.
BB.
No garage shall be situated closer than thirty feet (30') from the face of
(3) Except as provided above, all other zOning requil~ements shall be the same as
those requirements identified in Article V1 of Onfinance No. 348.
b. Planning Area 2.
(1) The uses permitted in Planning Area 2 of Specific Plan No. 164 shah be the
same as those uses permitted in Article VI, Section 6.1 of Ordinance No. 348.
(2) The development standards for Planning Area 2 of Specific Plan No. 164 shall
be the same as those standanis identified in Article VI, Section 6.2 of Oxdinance No. 348,
except that the development standards set forth in Article VI, Section 6.2(a), Co), (c), (d),
and (e)(1) and (2) shall be deleted and replaced by the following:
A. Building height shall not exceed two stories, with a ma~mum height of
thirty-five feet (35').
B. Lot area shall be not less than four thousand (4,000) square feet. The
minimum lot area shall be determined by excluding that portion of a lot that is used solely
for access to the portion of a lot used as a building site.
C. The minimum average width of that portion of a lot to be used as a
building site shall he thirty-five feet 05') with a minimum average depth of eighty feet (80').
That portion of a lot used for access on "flag" lots shall have a minimum width of twenty
feet (20').
R:~-~TAFPIP~14~PA93.CC6 ~1~1. Mb 6
D. The minimum fT0fltage Of a lot shall be forty feet (40'), except that lots
fronting on knuckles or cud-de-sacs may have a minimum ffonl3go Of thiwty feet (30').
B. The front yard shall be not less than thirty feet (30'), measured from
the existing street line or from any fiau~ street line as shown in any Specific Plan of
Highways, whichever is nearer the proposed structure.
F. Side yards on interior and through lots shall be not less than five feet
(5'). However, if a zero lot line design is utilized, the alternate side yard may not be less
than ten feet (10'). Side yards on comer and reverse comer lots shall be not less than ten
feet (10') from the existing street line or from any future street line as ~hown on any Specific
Plan of Highways, whichever is nearer the proposed structure, upon which the main building
sides, except that where the lot is less than fifty feet (50') wide, the yard need not exceed
twenty percent (20%) Of the lot.
In adch'~on, the following standard shah also apply:
AA. No lot shall have more than sixty percent (60%) Of its net area covered
by buildings or structures.
(3) Except as provided above, all other zoning requirements shah be the same as
those requirements identified in Attictc VI of Ordinance No. 348.
c. Planning ,Area 3.
(1) The uses permitted in Planning Area 3 of Specific Plan No. 164 shall be the
same as those uses permitted in Article VI, Section 6.1 or Ordimnce No. 348.
(2) The development standards for Planning Area 3 of Specific plan No. 164 shah
be the same as those sUtndards identified in Article VI, Section 6.2 of Ordinance No. 348,
except that the development standards set forth in Article VI, Section 6.2(a), Co), (c), (d),
and (e)(1) and (2) shall be deleted and replaced by the following:
A. Building height shah not exceed two stories, with a maximum height of
thirty-five feet (35').
B. Lot area shah be not less than four thousand (4,000) square feet. The
minimum lot area shah be determined by excluding that portion of a lot that is used solely
for access to the portion of a lot used as a building site.
C. The minimum average width of that portion Of a lot to be used as a
building site shall be thirty-five feet (35') with a minimum average depth Of eighty feet (80,).
That potlion of a lot used for access on "flag" lots slmH have a minimum width of twenty
feet (20').
D. The minimum frontage of a lot shah be forty feet (40'), except that lots
fronting on knuckles or cul-de-sacs may have a minimum frontage of thirty feet (30').
R:~TAFPRPT%I45PA93.CC6 2/18/94 kJb 7
B. The front yard shall be not less than thixty feet (30'), measured from
the existing street line or from any future street line as shown in any Specific Plan of
Highways, whichever is nearer the proposed structure.
F. Side yards on interior and through lots shall be not less than five feet
(5'). However, if a zero lot line design is utilized, the ~ltertmte side yard my not be less
than ten feet (10'). Side yards on corner and reverse comer lots shah be not less than ten
feet (10') form the existing street line or from any future street line as shown on any Specific
Plan of Highways, whichever is nearer the proposed structnre, upon which the main building
sides, except that where the lot is less than fifty feet (50') wide, the yard need not exceed
twenty peacent (20 ~) of the width of the lot.
In addition, the following standard shall also apply:
AA. No lot shall have more than sixty percent (6(} % ) of its net area covered
buildings or structures.
O) Except as provided above, all other zoning requirtm~ents shall be the same as
those requirements identified in Article VI of Ordinnnce No. 348.
d. Pinnning Area 4.
(1) The uses permitted in Planning Area 4 of Specific Plan No. 164 shall be the
same as those uses perufitted in Article VI, Section 6.1 of Ordinauce No. 384.
(2) The development standards for Planning Area 4 of Specific Plan No. 164 shah
be the same as those standards identified in Axticle VI, Section 6.2 of Ordinance No. 348,
except that the development standards set foxth in Article VI, Section 6.2(a), Co), (c), (d),
and (e)(1) and (2) shah be deleted and replaced by the following:
A. Building height shall not exceed two stories, with a maximum height of
thirty-five feet (35').
B. Lot area shall be not less than four thousand (4,000) square feet. The
minimum lot area shall be 'determined by excluding that portion of a lot that is used solely
for access to the portion of a lot used as a building site.
C. The minimum average width of that portion of a lot to be used as a
building site shah be thirty-five feet (35') with a minimum average depth of eighty feet (80').
That portion of a lot used for access on "flag" lots shall have a minimum width of twenty
feet (20').
D. The minimum frontage of a lot shall be forty feet (40'), except that lots
fronting on knuckles or cul-de-sacs my have a minimum frontage of thirty feet (30').
R:~STAIq311v~I45PA93.CC6 2/1~/94 Idb 8
E. The front yard shall be not less than thirty feet 00'), measured from
the existing street line or from any future street line as shown in any Specific Plan of
Highways, whichever is nearer the proposed structure.
F. Side yards on interior and through lots shah be not less than five feet
(5'). However, ff a zero lot lille design is i/tillved, the -Itemsto side yard my not be less
than ten feet (10'). Side yards on corn~ and reverse corner lots shall be not less than ten
feet (10') from the existing sum line or from any future street line as shown on any Specific
Plan of Highways, whichever is nearer the proposed structure, upon which the main building
sides, except that where the lot is less than fifty feet (50') wide, the yard need not exceed
twenty percent (20%) of the width of the lot.
In addition, the following standard shah also apply:
AA. No lot slual have more than sixty percest (60 ~ ) of its net area covered
by buildings or strucmx~.
(3) Except as provided above, all other zoning requirements shah he the same as
those requirements identified in Article VI of Ordinance No. 348.
e. Phnnin~ Area 5.
(1) The uses permitted in Planning Area S of Specific Phn No. 164 shall be the
same as those uses permiRed in Article VI, Section 6.1 of Ordinance No. 348.
(2) The development standards for Planning Area S of Specific 'Plan No. 164 shall
be the same as those standards identifiM in Article VI, Section 6.2 of Ordinance No. 348,
except that the development standards set forth in Article VI, Section 6.2(a), (b), (c), (d),
and (e)(1) and (2) shall be deleted and replaced by the following:
A. Building height shall not exceed two stories, with a maximum height of
thirty-five feet 05').
B. Lot area shall be not less than four thousand (4,000) square feet. The
minimum lot area shall be determined by excluding that portion of a lot that is used solely
for access to the portion of a lot used as a buikling site.
C. The minimum average width of that portion of a lot'W be used as a
building site shall he thirty-five feet 05') with a minimum average depth of eighty feet (80').
That portion of a lot used for access on "flag" lots shall have a miniroBin width of twellty
feet (20'). ·
D. The minimum frontage of a lot shall be forty feet (40'), e0tcept that lots
fronting on knuckles or cul-de-sacs may have a minimum frontage of thirty feet (30').
R:~rAF!qtPT~I4$PA93.CC6 2/18/~kt kb 9
the existing street line or from any future street line as shown in any Specific Plan of
Highways, whichever is nearer the proposed structure.
F. Side yards on interior and tixmgh lots shall be not less than five feet
(5'). However, if a zero-lot line design is u~li~, the alteax~ side yard may not be less
than ten feet (10'). Side yards on corner and reverse comer lots shall be.not less than ten
feet (10') from the existing street line or from nay future street line as shown on nay Specific
plan of Highways, whichever is nearer the proposed structure, upon which the mnin bui/ding
sides, ncg~ that where the lot is bss than fifty feet (50') wide, the yard need not exceed
twenty percent (20 % ) of the width of the lot.
In addition, the following standard shall also apply:
AA. No lot shah have more than sixty pereem (60%) of its net area covered
by buildings or covered by buildings or structures.
0) Except as provided above, all other zoning requirements shah be the same as
those requirements identified in Article VI of Ordinance No. 348.
f. Fianninr Area 6.
(1) The uses ponnitted in Ptnnning Area 6 of Specific Plan 'No. 164 shall be the
same as those uses permitted in Article VI, Section 6.1 of Ordinance No. 348.
(2) The development standards for Planning Area 6 of Specific Plan No. 164 shall
be the same as those sUmdards identified in Article VI, Section 6.2 of Oxdinance No. 348,
except that the development standards set forth in Article VI, Section 6.2(a), Co), (c), (d),
and (e)(1) and (2) shall be deleted and replaced by the following:
A. Building height shah not exceed two stories, with a maximum height of
thirty-five feet (35').
B. Lot area shall be not less than four thousand (4,000) square feet. The
minimum lot area shall be detez~ined by excluding that portion of a lot that is a used solely
for access to the portion of a lot used as a building site.
C. The minimum average width of that portion of a lot to be used as a
building site shall be thirty-five feet (35') with a minimum average depth of eighty feet (80').
That portion of a lot used for access on "flag" lots shall have a miniqlum width of twenty
feet (20').
D. The minimum frontage of a lot shall be forty feet (40'), except that lots
fronting on knuckles or M-de-sacs may have a minimum frontage of thirty feet (30').
B. The front' yard shah be not less than thirty feet (30'), measured from
the existing street line or from any future street line as shown in nay Specific Plan of
Highways, whichever is nearer the proposed structure.
R:WrAFFRPT~!4SPA93.CC6 2/18/94 Idb '10
F. Side yards on interior and through lots shah be not less than five feet
(5'). However, if a zero-lot line design is utiliT_sl, the alternate side yard may not be less
than ten feet (10'). Side yards on comer and reverse comer lots shah be not less than ten
feet (10') from the existing street line or from any future street line as shown on any specific
Plan of Highways, whichever is nearer the proposed structure, upon which the main building
sides, except that where the lot is less than fifty feet (50') wide, the yard need not exceed
twenty percent (20~) of the width of the lot.
In addition, the following standard shah also apply:
AA. No lot shall have more than sixty l~i~zat (60 ~ ) of its net area covered
by buildings or stmctuw~.
(3) Except as provided above, all other zoning requirements shall be
the same as those requirements identified in Arlicle VI of OMinance No. 348.
g. Phnning Area 7.
(1) The uses perufitted in Planning Area 7 of Specific Plan No. 164 shall be single
family residentlnl and park.
(2) The development standards for Planning Area 7 of Specific Plan No. 164 shall
be as follows:
A. Building height shah not exc, oed two stories, with a maximum height of
thirty-five feet (35').
square feet.
Lot area shah be not less than Three Thousand Four Hundred O, 400)
C. The minimum width of a lot shall be Forty feet (40') and the minimum
depth shah be Eight-Five feet (85').
D. The .minimum frontage of a lot shall be forty feet (40'), except that lots
fronting on knuckles or cul-de-sacs may have a minimum frontage of Fifteen feet (15').
E. Minimum yard requirements area as follows:
(1) The front yard shall be not less than Ten feet (10'), measured
from the front property line.
(2) Skic yards on interior and through lots shall be not tess than
Five feet (5'). However, if a zero-lot line design is utili74~d, the altorllate side yard may not
be less than Ten feet (10') from the existing side property line.
(3) The rear yard shall not be less than Five feet (5').
R:~TAFFRPT%i4.SPA93.CC6 2/11/94 klb '[ '[
(4) Pool sefosc~ shall be 3 feet for side yard and 3 feet for rear
Patio cover .selbach shah be 3 feet. for side yard and 3 feet for
(6) Room/h~lding additions shall adhere to the same setback
requirements as those of the main structures.
(7) Yard Encroachmerits. Where yards are required by this
ordinance, they shah be open and tmobsmsaed from the ground to the sky and kept free of
all structural oncro~chments, except as follows:
a. Outside stairways or landing places, ff unroofed and
unenclosed, may extend into a required side yard for a digance of not exceed three (3) feet
and/or inW the required rear yard a distance of not to exceed five (5) feet.
b. Cornices, canopies, and other similar architectural
features not providing additional floor space within time building may extend into a required
yard not to exceed one (1) foot. Eaves may extend three (3) feet to a required yard. One
(1) pergob or one (1) covered but unenclosed passenger landing may extend into either side
yard provided it does not reduce the side yard below five (5) feet and its depth does not
exceed twenty (20) feet.
dwelling unit.
Automobile paridng shah provide one (1) two car garage per each
(3) Except as provided above, all other zoning requirements shah be the same as
those requirements identified in Ordinance No. 348.
h. Pismning Area 8.
(1) The uses permitted in Planning Area 8 of Specific Plan No. 164 shall be single
family residential.
(2) The development standards for Planning Area 8 of Specific Plan No. 164 shall
be as follows:
A. Building height shall not exceed two stories, with a maximum height of
thirty-five feet (35').
B. Lot area shall be not less than Ten Thousand (10,000) square feet.
C. The minimum width of a lot shall be Eighty feet (80') and the
minimum depth shah be One hundred twenty five feet (12S').
R:~TAFFR.P~145PA93.CC6 ~/18/94, ldb 'J 2
D. The minimum frontage of a lot shah be Eighty feet (80'), except that
lots fronting on knuckles or cul-de-sacs may have a minimum frontage of Twenty feet (20').
B. Minimum yard requirements area as fonows:
(1) The front yard shall be not less than Twenty feet (20'),
measured from the front property line.
(2) Side yards on interior and through lots shah be not less than
Five feet (5'). However, if a zero-lot line design is utilized, the alternate side yard may not
be less than Ten feet (10') from the existing side property line.
(3) The rear yard shah not be less than Twenty feet (20').
1>ool setbacks shah be 3 feet for side yard and 3 feet for rear
(s)
Patio cover setb~ct~ shall be 3 feet for side yard and 3 feet for
(6) Room/building additions shall adhere to the same setback
requirements as those of the main structures.
all structural encroachmen[s, except as follows:
a. Outside stairways or landing places, if unroofed and
uncnclosed, may extend into a required side yard for a distance of not exceed three (3) feet
and/or into the required rear yard a distance of not to exceed five (5) feet.
b. Cornices, canopies, and other similar architectural
features not providing additional floor space within the building may extend into a r~luired
yard not to exceed one (1) foot. Eaves my extend three (3) feet to a required yard. One
(1) pergola or one (1) covered but unenclosed passenger landing may extend into either side
yard provided it does not reduce the side yard below five (5) feet and its de~ does not
exceed twenty (20) feet.
Fm
dwelling unit.
Automobile parlclng shall provide one (1) two car garage per each
(3) Except as provided above, all other zoning Iequifemeat$ shall be the same as
those requirements identified in Ordinance No. 348.
R:~qTAFFRF~I45PA93.CC6 2/1g/94 ldb 13
i. PJann~nl, Anm 9. (Commerci~ 'B')
(1) The uses permitted in Plantdug Area 9 of Specific Plan No. 164 shall be the
same as those uses pexmittcd in Axticle IX, Section 9,1 of Ordinnnce NO. 348; except that
the uses permit~ pursuant to Section 9.1(a)(1), (5), (6), (7), (9), (14), (15), (17), (22),
(23), (28), (29), (35), (39), (42), (45), (48), (49), (50), (51), (53), (54), (59), (61), (66),
(68), (69), (75), (77), (79), (80), (82), (84), (86), (89), (91), (92), and (93); and (b)(1), (3)
through (8), (10) through (12), and (14) through (20) shah nat be permitted. In addition, the
permittni uses iden~fied under Section 9.1 (a) shall also inclucle churches.
(2) The dcwelopment standnxds for planning Area 9 of Specific Plan No. 164 sl~nl l
be the same as those standards idend~ed in Article IX, Section 9.4 of Ordinance No. 348,
except that the development standaM set forth in Article IX, Section 9.4(b) shah be deleted
and replaced by the following:
A. The front yard shnil be not less than twenty-five feet (25') and the rear
yard shall be not less than twenty feet (20'). The front setback shah be measured from the
specific plan street line. The rear setback shah be measured from the specific plan street
line. The rear setback shall be mcasmu~ from the existing rear lot line or from any recorded
alley or easement; if the rear line adjoins a street, the rear setback requirement shnll be the
same as required for a front setback.
B. There are no side yard requirments, except were the side yard abuts a
resicleDtinlly zoned area, in which case buildings shah be set back twenty-five feet (25') from
the side lot line. Bach side setback shall be meamx~ from the side lot line, or from the
specific plan street line.
In addition, the following standazds shall also apply:
AA. No lot shall have more than fifty percent (50%) of its net area covered
by buildings or structures.
BB. The minimum frontage of a lot shall be twenty-five feet (25').
CC. The minimum average width of that portion of a lot to be used as a
building site shah be twenty-five feet (25') with a minimum average depth of one hundred
feet (100').
(3) Except as provided above, all other zoning requirements shall be the same as
those requirements identified in Article IX of ~ No. 348.
j. Plnnniqf Area 10. (Office)
(1) The sues permitted in P18nning Area 10 of Specific Plan No. 164 shah be the.
same as those uses permitted in Article IX, Section 9.1 of Onlin~ce No. 348, cxccpt that
the uses permitted pursuant to Section 9.1(a)(1), (5), (6), (7), (9), (14), (15), (17), (22),
(23), (28), (29), (35), (39), (42), (45), (48), (49), (50), (51), (53), (54), (59), (61), (66),
R:~STAFFRPT~I4.SPA93.CC6 2/18/94 k]b 14
(68), (69), (75), (77), (79), (80), (82), (84), (86), (89), (91), (92), and (93); and Co)(1), (3)
through (8), (10) through (12), and (14) through (20) shall not be peruitS. In addition, the
permitted uses identified under Section 9.1 (a) shall also include churches.
(2) The development sUmdards for Planning Area 10 of Specific Plan No. 164
shall be the same as tho~ ~ identified in Article IX, Section 9.4 of Ordinance No.
348, except that the development standard set forth in Article IX, Section 9.4Co) shall be
deleted and replaced by the following:
A. The front yard shall be not less than twenty-five feet (25') and the rear
yard shall be not less than twenty feet (20'). The front setback shall be measured form the
specific plan street line. The rear setback shall be measured from the existing rear lot line or
from any recorded alley or easement; if the rear line adjoins a street, the rear setback
requirement shall be file ~ame as required for a front setback.
B. There are not side yard req~ents, except where the side yard abuts
a residentially zoned area, in which case buildings shall be set back twenty-five feet (25')
from the side lot line. Each side setback shall be measured from the side lot line, or from
the specific plan street line.
In addition, the following standards shall also apply:
AA. No lot shall have more than fifty percent (50%) of its net area covered
~ by buildings or structures.
BB. The minimum frontage of a lot shall be twenty-five feet (2~').
CC. The minimum average width of that portion of a lot to be used as a
building site shall be twenty-five feet (25') with a minimum average depth of one hundred
feet (100').
(3) Except as provided above, all other zoning requinnnents shah be the same as
those requirements identified in Article IX of Ordinance No. 348.
k. Plannin~ Area 11. (Natural Open Sl:mce)
(1) The uses permitted in Planning Area 11 of Specific Plan No. 164 shall be the
same as those uses permitted in Article VIIIe, Section 8,100 of Ordinance No. 348. In
addition, the permitted uses identified under Section 8.100(a) shall also include undeveloped
open space and public parks.
(2) The development standards for Planning Area 11 of Specific Plan No. 164
shall be the same as those standards identified in Article VHIe. Section 8.101 of Ordinance
No. 348.
(3) Except as provided above, all other zoning requirements shall be the same as
those requirements identified in Article VIIIc of Ordinance No. 348.
R:XSTAFFRPr~I45PA93.CC6 ~l~l kJb 15
shall publish a summary of this Ordinance and a certified copy of the full text of this
Ordinance shall be posted in the offace of the City Clerk at least. five days prior to the
adoption of this Ordinance. Within 15 days from adoption of this Ordinance, the City Clerk
shall publish a sl~mm=ry of this Ordiliallce, together with the names of the Coul~imembers
voting for and against the Ordinance, and post the same in the office of the City Clerk.
Section 4. PASSED, APP OVED, AND ADOPT!~ this
__ day of
ATTBST:
RON ROBBRTS
MAYOR
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALI~O~
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITYOFTHMILr'ULA
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify
that the foregoing Ordinance No. 9 was duly introduced and placed upon its first
reading at a xt%,ular meeting of the City Council on the __ day of , 1~.,_,
and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the
City Council of the City of Temecuh on the day of , by the following
roll call vote:
AYKS:
NOKS:
ABSENT:
COUN_Crr
COUNCK,MnMBERS
COUNCILMEMBERS
rUN~S.G~
C1TYCT-nP, K
R:~TAFPRFI~I45PA~3.CC6 2718~st kJb 'J 6
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
RESOLUTION NO. 94-
R:~STAPPRFI~I45PA93.CC6 2~18/94 klb '] 7
~IXJTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF ~ CITY COUNCIL OF T~- CITY OF
T]~4ECUIA APPROVING SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 164,
AlViRNDI~qI~/T NO. 2 (PIANNING APPLICATION NO. 93-010)
LOCATED ON THR NORTH WEST CORNER OF NICOLAS
ROAD AND NORTH GENERAL KEARNY ROAD, CHANGING
TRY- ZONING FOR PIANNING AREA 7 FROM VERY ~tGH
DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (20 DWRI-T -~NG UNITS PER ACRE)
TO HIGH DENStrY RESIDENTIAL (12 DWR~ .IJNG UNITS PER
ACRE), ADDING A TmtRR (3) ACRE PARK TO PLANNING
AREA 7, ADJUSTING T~- BOUNDARIES Bs:'r~Vs:K,{
PLANNING AREAS 7, 8 AND 9, AND I~EPEALING
RESOL~ON NO. 9407
WRRRR&S, Leo Rofipmgh filed PA93-0145 in accordance with the Riverside
County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted
by reference;
WHIi~,EAS, said Specific Plan Amendment application was processed in the time and
manner prescribed by State and local hw;
WHRRP. JiS, the Planning Commission consi___da~! said Specific plan Amendment on
November 1, 1993 at which time inte~ed persons had an ognmity to testify either in
support or opposition;
WH!~RJ,8, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, the Commission
recommended approval of said Specific Plan Amendment;
WIIERR~kS, the City Council conducted public hearings pertaining to said Specific
Plan Amendment on December 14, 1993, and January 2.5, 1994, at which time interested
persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition to said Specific Plan
Amendment;
WIlERE/kS, the City Council received a copy of the Commi,~sion proceedings and
Staff Report regarding the Specific Plan Amendment;
NOW, THRRRPORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THR CITY OF TIi~iECULA
DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS
R:~STAFFRP~I45PA93.CC6 2/1V94 klb '[ 8
Seaion 1. FincliniC. The City Council in appmvinZ the proposed Specific Plan
Amendment, makes the following findings:
1. The-project is annp__~_le with surrounding land uses of sinZle-family
residential since it is separated by Nicolss Road and the Santa Gemudis Creek and impacts
have been reduced to a level of in$i~mi~cance.
2. The proposed action is consistent with the City's General Plan.
3. The proposal win not have an adverse effect on surrounding property,
because it does not repxesem a siZnificant change to the planned land use of the area, due to
the fact that the proposed land use is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Element and
the overall density is being reduced.
4. The project will have a positive impact on the surrounding land uses
since it is intnxiucing an additional new park to the area.
Section 2. l~'~viro,,,.-e.:toi Comi,i~,.nee. A Inltisl Study was prepared for Specific
Plan No. 164, Amendment No. 2 and Tentative Tract Ms.n No. 27827 and it revealed no
signifi~ impaN that have not been mitigated to an insignificant level. Therefore, Staff
recommends adoption of a Negative Declaration. The City Council has reviewed and
considered the proposed Negative Declaration and comme~'rs received thereon and the
Negative Declaration is hereby approved.
Seaion 3. Conditiom. Amendment No. 2 (P-oxipauZh Estates) to Specific Plan No.
164 which is aUached as Bxhibit A, is hereby approved, subjea to the text of Amendment
No. 2 being revised consistent with the instructions set forth in Exhibit B. The City
HanninE Director shall determine if Amendment No. 2 has been revised consistent with
Exhibit B.
Section 4. This Resolution supersedes and replaces Resolution No. 9407.
Seaion S. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution.
Section 6. PASSEB, APPROVEB AND ADOPTED this
1994.
__dayof ,
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
R:WrAFFRPI~I45PA93.CC6 2/18/94
STATE OF CAI-rI~ORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) SS.
CrI'YOFTEMK'I,KA )
I HimtRy CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was ckdy adopted by the City
Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on theday of
,1994, by the following vote of the Council:
COUNCrLI~IBERS:
NOF_~:
COUN~EP~:
COUNTERS:
CITY Ct-n~K
R:L~TA121rRP~I4~PA93.CC6 ~/18/94 ]LIb 20
EXHIBIT A
RORIPAUGH
SPECIFIC
--AMENDMENT
ESTATES
PLAN
N OI 2
PREPARED FOR:
D AV/ED LP.
PREPARED BY:
Lohr + Associates Inc
AUGUST 16.199:~
~ L°hr+Ass°ciates lncJ.
RORIPAUGH ESTATES
SPECIFIC PLAN 164
AMENDMENT NO. 2
TABLE OF~
ITEM PAGE
SUMMARY 1A
LIMITS OF S.P.A. NO. 2 (EXHIBIT) 2A
CIRCULATION ELEMENT (EXHIBIT) 3A
ROADWAY CROSS-SECTIONS (EXHIBIT) 4A
EQUESTRIAN TRAILS (EXHIBIT) 5A
DEVELOPMENT PLAN/ZONING 12A
DEVELOPMENT PLAN (EXHIBIT) 13A
PLANNING AREA 7 28A
PARKSITE LANDSCAPE (EXHIBIT) 28B
PLANNING AREA 7 (EXHIBIT) 29A
PLANNING AREA 8 30A
PLANNING AREA 8 (EXHIBIT) 31A
PLANNING AREA 9 32A
PLANNING AREA 9 (EXHIBIT) 33A
ORDINANCE NO. 348.3078 I
StatUARY
This second amendment to Roripaugh Estates Specific Plan No. 164
changes the land use for Planning Areas 7 & 8 from very high
Density Residential and neighborhood Commercial to High Density
Residential. It also adjusts the areas of these Planning Areas
slightly reducing Planning Areas 8 & 9 and increasing Planning
Area 7.
Exhibit 2A shows the limits of Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 with
respect to the overall Specific Plan.
All other land uses and design standards as outlined in Amendment
No. 1 of Specific Plan 164 as approved by the Riverside County
Board of Supervisors on Sept. 19, 1988 shall remain in effect.
A three acre park has been included in P.A. 7. ~aximum densities
of 243 DU and 121DU apply to P.A.~s 7 & 8 respectively with the
provision for a density transfer to allow a total of 364 D.U.
within the two planning areas.
Modified street sections have been developed for local residential
streets based on right of way widths of 46 feet and 50 feet.
I-
Z
b.I
Z
Z
C)
j I l Jr .~
Z
,,I
0')
U.
I,-
,J
ILl
Z C~
bJ '~
Z ~
iAN"rA
ROADWAY
CROSS-SECTIONS
It' I1' Ill' !Z°
· =lu6ar~ aa~ '')'''' ......TYPICAL SECrlOAI
'E"EN T,ql i'fRET
R:AAIAf!NG l~R~q 7
50'
,,r,jS' 16' 18' J 5' I3'
"":. """'~"'~' ;~I c,,,, f
MIIIE6tlI'E
T~PICAL ~ECTIO&I
R,B,C ~ i~ 57REET~
PL,qlt!!d!ld~ AREA 7
I',~ I 5" I=' i 16'
I/OiIIILK
SillIll R.C. PIIVEMENF
REAitEFaII~E BR3E / """' ' ...... J ...........
TYPfCRL SECTION.
I~.~NNIN6 ',qRER 7. · .
AMENDMENT NO. 2
F ORIPAUGH ESTATES
DAV / ED, L.P.
4A
,EXHIBIT 2A
· B Lohr+Associat.es IrK:
1.1.1
DEVELOPMENT PLAN
A. LAND~SE DENSIT~
The Roripaugh Estates is a multiple-use development
consisting of commercial, residential, open space,
and park areas. Residential land use is further divided
into sub-areas for more detailed land use type. The
residential portion of the plan proposes a total of
803 dwelling units in a variety of product types.
Planning Area 7 & 8 containing 23.6 acres and 10.1
acres respectively and are designated High Density
Residential 7-12 D.U./AC.(Gross)
A density transfer between Planning Area 7 & 8 shall be allowed
for a total of 364 D.U.'s within those planning areas.
12A
LIJ
z
7. PLAIHIINC AREA 7: High Density
° Area: 23.6 Acres
o Density:
12 D.U./AC. (Gross)
° Max No. of DU's: 243
o Permitted used:
Detached single-family housing
o Description:
High Density residential bordered
by Nicolas Road, Santa Gertrudes Creek,
and High Density.
° Planning standards:
- Access to Area 7 via Nicolas Road by dedicated roadways.
- Grid Road and Alley Alignments.
Class II Bike Trail along Nicolas Road (see Exhibits
4a and 15)
28A
- Detached Housing types.
- Landscape of proposed park site will be in accordance
with Exhibit 8G-B. PaSe 28B.
Density transfer between P.A. 7 & 8 shall allow for
a total of 364 D.U. In the event that one of these
planninS areas is developed at a lessor density the
unused units shall be applied to the remaininS planning
area.
Product type and typical plottinS and front yard
landscape plans shall be provided with the concurrent
processinS of the tentative map.
PAGE 2 OF 28A
Z
Z
Z
EXHIBIT "8G-B"
'
28B
.. ?.
7. PLANNING AREA 8: HIGH DENSIT~
o Area: 10.1 Acres
Density:
12 D.U./AC. (Gross)
Maximum No. of DU's: 121 - or as otherwise allowed
by the density transfer.
° Permitted uses: Attached/Detached housing.
Description: High Density residential bordered by
Nicolas Road, Santa Gertrudes Creek, High Density,
residential and commercial.
Planning standards:
Access to Area 8 via Nicolas Road and Planning
Area 9 to be determined at Plot Plan Phase consistent
with Exhibit 8H-A.
Class II Bike Trail along Nicolas Road
(see Exhibits 4a and 15).
- Attached/Detached housing.
30A
Buffered from adjacent commercial site by 25 foot wide
landscape strip.
Density transfer between P.A. 7 & 8 shall allow for
a total of 364 D.U. In the event that one of these
planning areas is developed at a lessor density the
unused units shall be applied-to the remaining planning
area.
PAGE 2 OF 3OA
'IIIIIIiti,
/~' 'S'~!'17'1~I1tllttt, EQUESTRIAN TRAIL
"" "' ~'o,Z',,,,,,,,, :',~,,,
1111111111,
C ,q ~. ~. i?lllllllllll, g
PLANNING AREA 8
9
F
AREA 9
NEIGHBORHOOD
COMMERCIAL
AREA 8
AREA 7
HIGH DENSITY
ARTERIAL-
HIGHWAY
IIO'R.O.W.
FUTI,[RE
c=~ CCESS
L
SCALE I"= 200'
~,~,~,,~ N I C O
AREA II
PARK "B"
BIKE TRAIL,
(5'WIDTH)
MEDIUM HIGH
DENSITY
AMENDMENT NO. 2
AREA
DENSITY
MAX. DENSITY
MAX. NO. OF D.U.'S
I0.1 AC.
HIGH
12 D.U./AC.,
121,
DENSITY TRANSFER SHALL' BE
ALLOWED BETWEEN P.A. 7 E~8
TO J~CHIEVE THE ASSIGNED 364
D.U. S
RORIPAUGH
ESTATES
DAV / ED., LP.
EXHIBIT 8'H-A
31A
9. PLANNING AREA 9: NEIGHKRH(X)DCON(IICIAL
o Area: 20.18 acres
Land Description: Commercial
o Description: Commercial site backing onto Santa Gertrudes
Creek. A local street provides access from intersection
of Roripaugh Road and Nicolas. An in-out only access
can be used from Winchester Road. The development
bordered by Winchester Road to the north, Area 8 a
commercial office site to the south, and a commercial
site and Park "B" to the west of Nicolas Road.
Planning Studies
- Access to Nicolas Road via a local street and direct
acces~ to Nicolas and in-out access"Off Winchester Road.
- Buffered from adjacent project sites by landscape.
- Class II Bike Trail along Nicolas Road.
- Access shall be provided to P.A. 8 consistent with Exhibit
8I-A.
32A
- Equestrian Trail along Santa Gertrudes Creek/open
space/conservation area (see Exhibits 4B and 16).
- Landscape standards for streets and slopes, see Details
- Park "B" is across street (See Exhibit 21).
PAGE 2 OF 32A
PLANNING AREA 9
AREA 9
AREA 8
HIGH DENSITY
~.ARTERIAL
GHWAY
,54' R.O.W.
SCALE I"=,tO0'
CLASS lr
BIKE 'TRAIL
( 5' Wl DTH)
AREA I0
COMMERCIAL
ARTERIAL HIGHWAY
I10' R.O.W.
AREA 20, 18 AC,
LAND USE . NEIGHBORHOOD
COMMERCIAL
LAND DESCRIPTION __COMMERCIAL
AMENDMENT NO. 2
F OIRIPAUGH ESTATES
DAV / ED ,. L.P.
B,
EXHIBIT 8I:-A
Lohr+Associates Inc
ORDINANCE NO. 348.3078
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF .TEMECULA
AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 348 RELATING TO ZONING
g. Plannin~ Area 7:
(1) The uses permitted in Planning Area 7 of Specific Plan No.
15~ shall be single family residential and park.
(2) The development standards for Planning Area 7 of Specific
Plan No. 16~ shall be as follows:
A. BulldinE height shall not exceed two stories, with a maximum
height of thirty-five feet (35').
B. Lot area shall be not less than Three Thousand Four Hundred
(~ ~00) square feet
C. The minimum width of a lot shall be Forty feet (~0') and
the minimum depth shall be Eighty-Five feet (85').
D. The minimum frontage of a lot shall be forty feet (~O'),except
chat lots froncing on knuckles or cul-de-sacs may have a minimum frontage
of Fifteen feet (15').
E. Ninimum yard requiremencs area as follows:
(1) The front yard shall be not less than Ten feet (10'),
measured from the front property line.
(2) Side yards on interior and through lots shall be not less
than Five feec (5'). However, if a zero-lot line design is utilized,
~he alternate side yard may not be less than Ten feet (10') from the
existing side property line.
(3) The rear yard shall not be less than Five feet (S').
(4) Pool setbacks shall be 3 feet for side yard and 3 feet for
-rear yard
{5) Patio cover setbacks shall be 3 feec for side yard and 3
feet for rear yard
(6) Room/building additions shall adhere to the same setback
requirements as chose of the main structures.
(7) Yard Encroachments. Where yards are required by this
ordinance. they shall be open and unobstructed from the ground
to the sky and kept free of all structural encroacnments. except
as follows:
Outside stairways or landing places, if unroofed and
unenclosed, may extend into a required side yard for a
distance of not to exceed three (3) feet and/or into the
required rear yard a distance of not to exceed five (5) feet.
Cornices, canopies, and other similar architectural features
not providing additional floor space within the building
may extend into a required yard not to exceed one (1) foot.
Eaves may extend three (3) feet into a required yard. One
(1) pergola or one (1) covered but unenclosed passenger
landing may extend into either side yard provided it does
not reduce the side yard below five (5) feet and its depth
does not exceed twenty (20) feet.
II.
F. Automobile parking shall provide one (i) two car garage per
each dwelling unit.
3. Except as provided above, all other zoning requirements shall
be the same as those requirements identified in Ordinance No. 3~8.
G. Plannin~ Area 8:
(1) The uses permitted in Planning Area 8 of Specific Plan
16~ shall be multi family residential.
(2) The development standards for Planning Area 8 Of Specific
Plan No. 164 shall be as follows:
A. Building height shall not exceed three stories, with a maximum
height of fifty feet (50').
B. Lot area shall be not less than 7200 square feet. The minimum
lot are shall be determined by excluding that portion of a lot that is
used solely for access to the portion of a lot used as a building site.
C. the minimum front and rear yards shall be twenty feet (20')
for buildings that do not exceed one-story in height. Any building which
exceeds one-story in height'shall be set back from the front and rear
lot lines no less than twenty-five feet (25'). The front set back shall
be measured from the front property line. The rear setback shall be
measured from the existing rear lot line or from any recorded alley or
easement; if the rear line adjoins a street, the rear setback requirement
shall be the same as required for a front setback.
D. The minimum side yard shall be fifteen feet (15') for buildings
that do not exceed one-story in height. Any building which exceeds one-
story in height shall be set back from each side lot line fifteen feet
(15') plus five feet (5') for each additional story. If the side yard
lII.
F. Automobile parking shall provide one (1) two car garage per
each dwelling unit.
3. Except as provided above, all other zoning requirements shall
be the same as those requirements identified in Ordinance No. 348.
G. PlanninR Area 8:
(1) The uses permitted in Planning Area 8 of Specific Plan No.
164 shall be multi family residential.
(2) The development standards for Planning Area 8 of Specific
Plan No. 164 shall be as follows:
A. Building height shall not exceed three stories, with a maximum
height of fifty feet. (50').
B. Lot area shall be not less than 7200 square feet. The minim-m
lot are shall be determined by excluding that portion of a lot that is
used solely for access to the portion of a lot used as a building site.
C. The minimum front and rear yards shall be twenty feet (20')
for buildings that do not exceed one-story in height. Any building which
exceeds one-story in height shall be set back from the front and rear
lot lines no less than twenty-five feet (25'). The front set back shall
be measured from the front property line. The rear setback shall be
measured from the existing rear lot line or from any recorded alley or
easement; if the rear line adjoins a street, the rear setback requirement
shall be the same as required for a front setback.
D. The minimum side yard shall be fifteen feet (15') for buildings
that do not exceed one-story in height. Any building which exceeds one-
story in height shall be set back from each side lot line fifteen feet
(15') plus five feet (5') for each additional story. If the side yard
III.
(15') plus five feet (5') for each additional story. If the side yard
adjoins a street, the side setback requirement shall be the same as
required for a front setback.
E. No threesstory building shall be closer than twenty feet (20')
to any other main building on the same lot and not two-story building
shall be closer than fifteen feet (15') to any other main building on
the same lot and no one-story building shall be closer than ten feet to
any other main building on the same lot.
F. LOT COVERAGE PERMITTED. In no case shall more than sixty (60)
per cent of any lot be covered by buildings.
G. Private open space requirements shall include 150 square feet
for each dwelling unit located on the ground floor and 100 square feet
for each dwelling unit located above the ground floor.
H. Common Open Space - A three quarter acre site shall be provided
for development of recreational amenities which may include basketball,
volleyball, barbecue, picnic areas, tot lots and open lawn areas.
I. Automobile parking:
1. Single Bedroom or studio dwelling unit: 1.25 spaces
per dwelling unit.
2. Two bedroom dwellings: 2.25 spaces per dwelling unit. Such
spaces shall be located within 200 feet of the building to be
served by these spaces.
3. Three or more bedroom dwellings: 2.75 spaces per dwelling
unit located within 200 feet of the building to be served by
these spaces.
J. Every main buildinS hereafter erected or structurally altered
shall have a lot or BuildinS site Gross area of not less than twenty one
hundred seventy eight {2,178)~square feet for each dwelling unit in such
main building.
C3) Except as provided above, all other zoning requirements shall
be the same as those requirements identified in Ordinance No. 348.
EXHIBIT B
CHANGES TO ~MENT NO. 2
All refer~ to the de~,_~y transfer betwee~ Phnning Areas 7 and 8 shall be deleted.
The total dweflln~ unit count for the specific plnn shall be updated to reflect the
elimination of all mside~tl=l units in Planning Area 8.
All exhibits and text shall be updated to reflect the correct zoning for Planning Area 8
as approved by City Council.
R:~AASBHS~I45PA93.CHG ~17,~4 m
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
RESOLUTION NO. 94-
1~:~TAFFRF~I4SPA93.OC6 2/1884.
RF, SOLU'IION NO. 94-
A RESOLUTION OF ~ CITY COUNCIL OF ~ C1TY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 27827
(PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 93-0144) LOCATED ON ~
NOR'tz!wF.~T CORNER OF NICOLAS ROAD AND NORTH
GENERAL KEARNY ROAD, CREATING A 162 SINGT-g FAMn.Y
LOT SUBDIVISION PLUS A TH!t~'~, (3) ACRE LOT FOR A
PUBLIC PARK WIT--IN S~C PLAN NO. 164, PLANNING
Altg& NO. 7 AND ltEPF.,AT.rNG RESOLUTION NO. 94-08
WHEuE&S, Leo Roripaugh filed a request for PA93-0144 (Tentative Tract Map No.
27827) in accordance with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision
Ordin~ncn, which the City has adopted by reference;
WHEREAS, the Planning Comml.e4ion considered said application on November 1, 1993
at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition;
WIP.~EAS, at the conclusion of the Commi.~sion hearing, the Commi.~sion
recommended approval of said application;
W'It]Ei~AS, the City Council considered said application on December 14, 1993, and
January 25, 1994, at which time interested persons had an oppommiW to testify either in support
or opposition;
WHEREAS~ at the conclusion of the Council hearing, the Council approved said
application;
NOW, Tm~gFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF TFIF~ CITY OF TEMECULA
DOES RF.8OLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOrJOWS:
Section 1. Findings. That the Teme~ia City Count! hereby makes the following
findings:
A. Purmmnt to Section 7.1 of Couuty 0txiinauce No. 460, no subdivisiou may be
appmved uuless the following fmdiugs are made:
specific plans.
2. That the design or improvement of the proposed land division is consistent
with applicable general and specific plans.
3. That the site of the proposed land division is physically suitable for the
type of development.
R:~qTAFI~I4SPA93.CC6 2/18794 klb 22
4. That the site of the proposed hncl division is physically suitable for the
proposed density of the development.
S. Tlmt the design of the proposed land division or proposed improvements
are not likely to cause substnnfisl ellVirOnmelllBJ dalnage or subgantially and umvoidably injure
6. That the design of the proposed land division or the type of impwvements
are not likely to cause serious public health problems.
7. That the design of the proposed land division or the type of improvements
will not conflict with menU, acquired by the public at large, for access through, or use of,
property within the proposed land division. A land division may be approved ff it is found that
alternate easements for access or for use will be provided and that they will be substantin!iy
equivalent to ones previously acquired by the public. This subsection shall apply only to
easements of record or to easements established by judgment of a court of competent
jurisdiction.
B. The Council in ~g the ~ project, makes the fortowing findings:
1. The proposed use or action as conditioned complies with State and Local
Planning and Zoning Laws.
2. The propo~ action is consistent with the City's General Plan.
3. The Planning Commi.~sion has considered the effect of its action upon the
housing needs of the region and has balanced these needs against the public service needs of the
residents and available fiscal and environmental resources (Gov. Cod Section 66412.3) and finds
that the project is consistent with the General Plan. Additionally, it will provide more diversity
in the housing types avaihhle to the residents of the City of Temecuh.
4. The proposed project will not restfit in discharge of waste' into the existing
sewer system that is in viol_n_~on of the requirements as set out in Section 13000 et see_. of the
California Water Code since the project has been conditioned to comply with Bastern Municipal
Water District's requirements.
conditioned.
The project has acceptable access by means of dedicated right-of-way as
6. The project is consistent with the intent of the original project approved
by the County of Riverside.
7. The project is consistent with the provisions of Specific Plan No. 164,
Amendment No. 2.
R:~TAPFRPl~i45PA93.CC6 ~ll~ IrJb 23
8. Said Fhdings are supported by mimRes, maps, exhibits and environmental
documents assochted with this application which are herein incorpont~ by rderence. Said
documents arc referenced in the attached Staff Report, Exhibits, Bavironmel~al Assessment, and
Conditions of Approval.
Section 2. Environmental Compliance. A Initial Study was prepared for Specific Plan
No. 164, Amendment No. 2 and Tentative Tract Msp No. 27827 and it revealed no significant
impacts that have not been mitigated to an insignificant level. Therefore, Staff recommends
adoption of a Negative Declaration. The City Council has w~riewed and considered the pwposed
Negative Declaration and all comments received thereon and the Negative Declaration is hereby
approved.
Section 3. Conditiorm. That the City of Temecula City Council hereby approved the
said application subject to the following conditions:
A. Exhibit A, attached hereto.
Section 4. This Resolution supersedes and replaces Resolution NO. 94-08.
Section S. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution.
Section 6. PASSED, APPROVEB AND ADOPTED this
1994.
ATTBST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
R:~TAPFIP~14$PA~.CC6 ~/l~kt klb 24
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
ClTYOI~TEVmCULA
I ltlfltF2SY CERTIl~ that the f~ Resohstio~ was duly adopted by the City
Council of the City of Temecula at a reEular meetin___~ thereof, held on the' day of
,1994, by the following vote of the Council:
COUNCK/dBMBBRS:
NOI~S:
COUNt:
COUNCH~iB/VIBERS:
IUNES. GRE~
CITYCL~RK
R:',,qTAFFRP~Id~PA9"J.CC6 2YLS/94 k~ 2[5
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No. 93-0144 (Tentative Tract Map No. 27827)
Project Description: A request to subdivide a 22.6 acre parcel into 162 single family
dwelling lots and 8 three (3) acre open space lot for a public park (Rodpaugh Cottages)
Assessofa Parcel No.: 911-150-035 and 911-150-038
Approval Date: January 25, 1994
Expiration Date: January 25, 1996
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Within Forty-Bght (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project
The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or
money order payable to the County Clerk in the amount of One Thousand Three
Hundred Twenty-Eight Dollars ($1,328.00), which includes the One Thousand Two
Hundred Fifty Dollars ($1,250.00) fee, in compliance with AB 3158, required by Fish
and Game Code Section 711.4(d)(2) plus the Seventy-Eight Dollars ($78.00) County
administrative fee to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination required under
Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section
15075. If within such forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant/developer has not
delivered to the Planning Department the check required above, the approval for the
project granted herein shall be void by reason of failure of condition, Fish and Game
Code Section 711.4(c).
General Requirements
The tentative subdivision shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act
and to all the requirements of Ordinance No. 460, unless modified by the conditions
listed below. A time extension may be approved in accordance with the State Map
Act and City Ordinance, upon written request, if made 30 days prior to the expiration
date.
The subdivider shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Temecula, it
agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City
of Temecula, its advisory agencies, appeal boards or legislative body concerning
Tentative Tract Map No. 27827, which action is brought within the time period
provided for in California Government Code Section 66499.37. The City of Temecula
will promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the
City of Temecula and will cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly
notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully
in the defense, the subdivider shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend,
indemnify, or hold harmless the City of Temecula.
R:~qTAFFRPT~I44PA93F.COA 2/14/94 k]b 1
If subdivision phasing is proposed, a phasing plan shall be submitted to and approved
by the Planning Director.
This project and all subsequent projects within this 'site shall be consistent with
Specific Plan No. 164, Amendment No. 2.
5
The project and all subsequent projects within this site shall be consistent with
Development Agreement No. 37 or any restatements or amendments thereto.
All street lights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted
to the Department of Building and Safety for plan check approval and shall comply
with the requirements of Riverside County Ordinance No. 655.
A Mitigation Monitoring Program shall be submitted and approvad by the Planning
Director prior to recordation of the Final Map or issuance of Grading Permits which
ever occurs first.
Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits
A copy of the Rough Grading plans shall be submitted and approved by the Planning
Director. The plans shall include a note for dust control indicating:
A. All active areas shall be watered at least twice a day.
Non-toxic soil stabilizers shall be applied to all unpaved roads in grading and
construction areas according to the manufacturer's specifications.
Wheel washers shall be installed where vehicles exit unpaved areas into paved
roads.
All dirt hauling trucks shall be covered or they shall maintain at least two (2)
feet of freeboard.
10.
The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Ordinance No. 663 by paying the
appropriate fee set forth in that ordinance. Should Ordinance No. 663 be superseded
by the provisions of a Habitat Conservation Plan prior to the payment of the fee
required by Ordinance No. 663, the applicant shall pay the fee required by the Habitat
Conservation plan as implemented by County ordinance or resolution.
11.
The applicant shall demonstrate by submittal of a written report that all mitigation
measures identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Program have been satisfied for this
stage of the development,
Prior to Recordation of the Final Map
12.
The following shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Director:
A. A copy of the Final Map
B. A copy of the Rough Grading Plans
R:~qTAFFRPI~I44PA93P.COA ~14/~t kit, 2
A copy of the Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) with the following notes:
(1)
This property is located within thirty (30) miles of Mount Palomar
Observatory. All proposed outdoor lighting systems shall comply with
the California Institute of Technology, Palomar Observatory
recommendations, Ordinance No. 655.
(2) This project is within a 100 year flood hazard zone.
A copy of the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&R's)
(1)
CC&R's shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director. The
CC&R's shall include:
(a)
Uability insurance and methods of maintaining, :!!:-;:, extedor of
all buildings, monument signs for the project, side yard
landscaping, Nieeloo Ilood IPcrkwcy by the Home Owners
Association. (Amended By Planning Commission on November
1, 1993).
(b)
Tho individual lot landoooping, tho wall along Nioolos Read, and
tho oxtorior of tho buildingo oholl bo maintoinod by tho individual
homoownoro. (Amended By Planning Commission on November
1, 1993).
(c)
The wall along Nicolas Road shall be maintained by the Home
Owners Association paintad tho original oolor by tho individual
homoownoro. (Amended By Planning Commission on November
1, 1993).
(d) No parking shall be allowed on the driveways.
(e)
Roll-up garage doors shall always be used to replace the original
garage doors for units with shared driveways.
(f)
The garage door openers and the lights on the buildings and the
pole lighting that light the alleys shall be maintained and
operational at all times. (Amended by City Council on January
25, 1994).
(2)
No lot or dwelling unit in the development shall be sold unless a
corporation, association, property ownsr's group or similar entity has
been formed with the right to soeass d properlle individually owned or
jointly owned which have any rights or interest in the use of the
common areas and common facilities in the development, such
assessment power to be sufficient to meet the expenses of such entity,
and with authority to control, and the duty to maintain, all of said
mutually available features of the development.' Such entity shall
operate under recorded CC&R's which shall include compulsory
R:~STAFFRFI~I44PA93F. COA 2/14/94 klb 3
membership of all owners of lots and/or dwelHng units and flexibility of
-sseel:imnts to meet changing costs of maintenance, repairs, and
service. Recorded CC&R's shall permit enforcement by the City for
proddoes required as Conddoes of Approval. The developer shall
submit evidence of compliance with this requirement to, and receive
approval of, the city prior to making any such sale. This contrition shall
net apply to land dedcetsd to the City for public purposes. (Amended
By Planning Commission on November 1, 1993).
(3)
Every owner of a dwe~ing unit-or lot shall own as an appurtenance to
such dwelling unit or lot, either (1) an undivided interest in the common
areas and facilities, or (2) a share in the corporation, or voting
membership in an association owning the common areas and facilities.
(Amended By Planning Commission on November 1, 1993).
The project shall be consistent with the requirements of the French Valley
Airport Plan when the plan is adopted,
The applicant shall demonstrate by submittal of a written report that all
mitigation measures identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Program have been
satisfied for this stage of the development,
Prior to Issuance of Building Permits
13. The following shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Director:
A. Construction landscape plans consistent with the following:
(1) City Standards.
(2) The approved Typical Conceptual Landscape Plans.
(3) Automatic irrigation for all landscaped areas.
(4)
Complete screening of all ground mounted equipment from the view of
the public from streets and adjacent property.
(5)
Front yard and slope landscaping within individual lots prior to issuance
of the first building permits within each of the phases of the Final Map,
(6)
Change the California Sycamore in the Nicolas Road Conceptual Plans
to London Plane Tree.
B, Wall and fence plans consistent with the following:
(1)
All walls and fences shall be a minimum of six (6) feet measured from
the highest grade or as otherwise specified below.
(2)
A six foot six inch (6' 6") high decorative block wall or a combination
decorative block wall and berming (measured from the finished pad
R:~3TAFPRP~l,I,IPA93F.COA 2/14/94 kib 4
14.
elevation) shall be constructed on the mar property lines for lots 1
through 22, 103, 104 and 162, and on the side property lines for lots
1, 22, 103 and 162. These walls shall have a surface density of at
least 3.5 pounds per square foot, and shall have no openings or cracks
(Refer to Preliminary Noise Analysis prepared by Mestra Grave
Associates, August 11, 1993).
(3)
Decorative block walls shall be required for the side yards for corner lots
and along the western property line (lots 103 through 121 ).
(4)
Wrought iron, decorative block or wrought iron combination wallsshall
be required to take advantage of views for rear yards along the northerly
property line (lots 121 through 154) and lots 155 through 162 and the
side yard for lot 154.
(5)
Wood fencing shall be used for all side and rear yard fencing when not
restricted by (b), (c) and (d) above.
(6)
Tho wall along Nioolos Read oholl bo oonotruotod ontiroly, inoluding tho
footingo, within tho individual icto or, d not within tho publio right of
~':.¥. (Amended By Planning Commission on November 1, 1993).
Precise grading plans including all structural setback measurements consistent
with the approved rough grading plans and the approved plottings.
Elevations, floor plans and colors and materials consistent with the approved
plans.
E. The Model Home Complex Plot Plan (if applicable) which includes the following:
(1) Site Plan with off-street perking
(2) Construction Landscape Plans
(3) Fencing Plans
(4) Building Elevations
A Noise Analysis shall be submitted for review and approval for the interior
spaces within the project. The maximum interior noise level shall be 45 CNEL.
Ge
The pole end light standards for the alleys. (Added by City Coundl on January
25, 1994).
Roof-mounted mechanical equipment shall not be permitted within the subdivision;
however, solar equipment or any other energy saving devices shall be permitted with
Planning Director approval.
R:~STAFIaRPT~i44PA93F. COA 2/14/N Idb 5
15.
The applicant shall demonstrate by a written report that all mitigation measures
identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Program have been satisfied for this stage of the
development.
Pdor to luuance of Occupancy Permits
16.
If deemed necessary by the Planning Director, the applicant shall provide additional
landscaping to effectively screen various components of the project.
17.
Front yard and slope landscaping and all fencing within individual lots shall be
completed for inspection.
18.
All the Conditions of Approval shall be complied with to the satisfaction of the
Directors of Planning, Public Works, Community Services and Building and Safety.
19.
Roll-up garage doors with automatic garage door openers shall be provided for units
with shared driveways. Automatic garage door openers shall be provided for all units.
20.
The wall and the associated landscaping along Nicolas Road shall be installed prior to
issuance of the first occupancy permit within each of the phases of the Final Map that
front Nicolas Road.
21.
The monument signs for the project shall be maintained by the Home Owners
Association opplioont and ohall bo romovod, if within right of way, prior to ioouonoo
of tho Ioet final roloaoo of tho projoot. (Amended By Planning Commission on
November 1, 1993).
22.
All pole lighting in the alleys shall be installed pdor to issuance of the first occupancy
permit of any building in that alley. (Added by City Coundl on January 25, 1994).
23.
All potential home owners shall be prodded with a copy of the White Report
containing all pertinent information prior to the purchase of each home. (Added by
City Council on January 25, 1994).
24.
The applicant shall demonstrate by a written report that all mitigation measures
identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Program have been satisfied for this stage of the
development.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
The following are the Department of Public Works Conditions of Approval for this project, and
shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All questions regarding the true
meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the appropriate staff person of the Department
of Public Works.
General Requirements
R:~TAPPiFrXI44PAgZF.COA 2/14/94 IrJb 6
25.
It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the Tentative Tract Map all
existing and proposed easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and
drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for
further review and revision.
26.
A Grading Permit for either rough or precise (including ell on-site flat work and
improvements) grading shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior
to commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained road right-
of-way.
27.
An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works.prior
to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City
right-of-way.
28.
All 'improvement plans, grading plans, landscape and irrigation plans shall be
coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements
contiguous to the site.
29.
Pursuant to Section 66493 of the Subdivision Map Act, any subdivision which is part
of an existing Assessment District must comply with the requirements of said section.
Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits
30.
A copy of the grading and improvement plans, along with supporting hydrologic and
hydraulic calculations shell be submitted to the Riverside County Flood Control and
Water Conservation District for approval prior to recordation of the final map or the
issuance of any permit. A permit from Riverside County Rood Control and Water
Conservation District is required for work within their Right-of-Way.
31.
A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed
and approved by the Department of Public Works. The plan shall comply with the
Uniform Building Code, Chapter 70, City Standards, and as additionally required in
these Conditions of Approval.
32.
All lot drainage shall be directed to the driveway and/or the alley by side yard drainage
swales independent of any other lot.
33.
The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an
Environmental Constraint Sheet recorded with any underlying maps related to the
subject property.
34.
The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board.
No grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed with
the Regional Water Quality Control Board or the project is shown to be exempt from
that agency.
R:~TAFPRF~I44PA93F.COA 2/14/94 klb 7
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
Regional Water Quality Control Board, San Diego Region;
Riverside 'County Flood Control and Water Conservation
Planning Department;
Department of Public Works;
Riverside County Health Department;
Community Services District (TCSD);
General Telephone;
Southern California Edison Company; and
Southern California Gas Company.
A Soils Report shall be prepared by a registered Soils Engineer and submitted to the
Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall
address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the
construction of engineered structures and pavement sections.
An Erosion Control Plan in accordance with City Standards, shall be prepared by a
registered Civil Engineer and submitted to the Department of Public Works for review
and approval.
The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading
and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and
subject to approval by the Department of Public Works.
Graded but undeveloped land shall be maintained in a weed free condition and shall be
either planted with interim landscaping or provided with other erosion control measures
as approved by the Department of Public Works.
A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the prevailing Area
Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new development. The charge is
payable to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District prior
to issuance of any permit. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has
already been credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid.
The Developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or easements for any off-
site work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public
Works at no cost to any agency.
The Developer shall accept and properly dispose of all off-site drainage flowing onto
or through the site. In the event the Department of Public Works permits the use of
streets for drainage purposes, the provisions of Section XI of Ordinance No. 460 will
apply. Should the quantities exceed the street capacity, or use of streets be prohibited
for drainage purposes, the Developer shall provide adequate facilities as approved by
the Department of Public Works.
R:~TAPPRPT~I44PA93F.COA 2/14~ IrJb 8
43.
The Developer shall protect downstream properties from damages caused by alteration
of the drainage patterns; i.e., concentration or diversion of flow. Protection shall be
provided by constructing adequate drainage facilities, including enlarging existing
facilities or by securing a drainage easement.
A Rood Plain Development Permit and Drainage Study shall be submitted to the
Department of Public Works for review and approval. The drainage study shall include,
but not be limited to, the following criteria:
Drainage and flood protection facilities which will protect all structures by
diverting site runoff to streets or approved storm drain facilities as directed by
the Department of Public Works.
Adequate provision shall be made for the acceptance and disposal of surface
drainage entering the property from adjacent areas.
The impact to the site from any flood zone as shown on the FEMA flood hazard
map and any necessary mitigation to protect the site.
D. Identify and mitigate impacts of grading to any adjacent floodway.
45.
The location of existing and post development 100-year floodplain and
floodway shall be shown on the improvement plan.
The site is in an area identified on the Rood Hazard Maps as Flood Zone "A" and is
subject to flooding of undetermined depths. Prior to the approval of any plans, this
project shall comply with Ordinance No. 91-12 'of the City of Temecula, and with the
rules and regulations of FEMA for development within Rood Zone "A', which may
include obtaining a letter of map revision from FEMA.
46.
The following storm drain facilities shall be provided along with the facilities as shown
on the Tentative Map. The requirement for the underground facilities is to mitigate the
surface runoff onto Nicolas Road, the potential maintenance of the nuisance runoff
created by this development, and negate the provision of additional drainage facilities
downstream since Assessment District 161 did not accommodate this development's
proposed runoff in sizing the downstream drainage facilities.
Catch basins shall be installed at the intersection of "G" Street and Nicholas
Road to eliminate the cross gutter.
The site shall be designed to minimize the contributory onsite runoff to Nicolas
Road at "A' Street by providing additional catch basins and storm drain pipes
or by redesigning the grades near the intersection of Nicolas Road and 'A'
Street.
Prior to the Issuance of Encroachment Permits
47.
All conditions of the grading permit and encroachment permit shall be complied with
to the satisfaction of the Public Works Department.
R:~I'APFRP~I44PA931a,COA 2/14~Jk~ Idb 9
48.
49.
50.
Improvement plans, including but not limited to, streets, parkway trees, street lights,
driveways, drive aisles, parking lot lighting, drainage facilities and paving shall be
prepared by a registered Civil Engineer on 24" x 36" mylar sheets and approved by the
Department of Public Works, Final plans (and profiles on streets) shall show the
location of existing utility facilities and easements as directed by the Department of
Public Works,
The following criteria shall be observed in the design of the improvement plans to be
submitted to the Department of Public Works:
Flowline grades shall be 0,5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum.over
A.C. paving.
Sm
Driveways shall conform to the applicable City Standard Nos, 207, 207A, and
208.
Street lights shall be installed along the public streets adjoining the site in
accordance with Ordinance No. 461 and shall be shown on the improvement
plans as directed by the Department of Public Works.
Spacing of pole lights in the alleys shall be determined by the City Engineer.
(Amended by City Council on January 25, 1994).
5 foot wide concrete sidewalks shall be constructed per City Standard Nos.
400 and 401 specifications,
Improvement plans shall extend 300 feet beyond the project boundaries or as
otherwise approved by the Department of Public Works.
Gm
Minimum centerline radii shall be in accordance with City Standard No. 113 or -
as otherwise approved by the Department of Public Works.
All reverse curves shall include a 100-foot minimum tangent section or as
otherwise approvad by the Department of Public Works.
All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees or as
approved bY the Department of Public Works.
J. All units shall be provided with zero clearance garage doors.
Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersections and
adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility.
All concentrated drainage directed towards the public street shall be conveyed
through under-sidewalk drains.
All driveways shall be located a minimum of 2 foot from the side property line unless
otherwise provided for with a joint use easement for ingress/egress.
R:~TAFI~I44PA93F.COA %/14/9w{. kJb 10
51.
In order for the City to agree to accept and maintain the proposed alleys, they shall be
subject to the following conditions:
· The alleys shall be concrete paved.
· No utilities shall be installed within the alleys.
Parking shall not be permitted along the alleys on trash and sweeping days and
they shall be signed accordingly. (Amended by the City Coundl on January 25,
1994).
Lights shall be installed on each garage and/or every house.
The Developer shall file an application with TCSD for inclusion of the alleys
within Service Level 'R' to provide for the maintenance of the alleys.
52.
All utility systems including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer, and cable TV shall
be provided for underground, with easements provided as required, and designed and
constructed in accordance with City Codes and the utility provider. Telephone, cable
TV, and/or security systems shall be pre-wired in the residence.
53. All utilities, except electrical lines rated 33kv or greater, shall be installed underground.
54.
A construction area Traffic Control Plan shall be deigned by a registered Civil Engineer
and reviewed by the Department of Public Works for any street closure and detour or
other disruption to traffic circulation as required by the Department of Public Works.
55.
The stop bar at the southbound Warbler Circle approach shall be positioned five (5)
feet from Nicolas Road curb line,
56. All required fees shall be paid.
Prior to Recordation of Find Map
57. Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid.
58.
The Developer shall construct or post secudty and enter into an agreement
guaranteeing the construction of the following public/private improvements within 18
months in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the
Department of Public Works.
Street improvements, which may include, but are not limited to: pavement,
curb and gutter, sidewalks, drive approaches, street lights, alley pole lights,
signing, traffic signals and other traffic control devices as appropriate.
(Amended by City Coundl on January 25, 1994.).
B. Storm drain facilities.
C. Landscaping (slopes and parkways).
R:~qTAFFRP~I44PA93F.COA 2/14/94 k]b 1 I
D. Erosion control and slope protection. ~-~
59.
60.
61.
62.
E. Sewer and domestic water systems.
F. Undergrounding of proposed utility distribution lines.
As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board;
Rancho California Water District;
Eastern Municipal Water District;
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District;
City of Temecula Fire Bureau;
Planning Department;
Department of Public Works;
Riverside County Health Department;
Cable TV Franchise;
Community Services District;
General Telephone;
Southern California Edison Company;
Southern California Gas Company;
Department of Fish and Game; and
Army Corps of Engineers.
All road easements and/or street dedications shall be offered for dedication to the
public and shall continue in force until the City accepts or abandons such offers. All
dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the Department of
Public Works.
A utility maintenance easement in favor of the Home Owners Association shall be
recorded in conjunction with the recordation of the Final Map over the twenty (20)
Foot alleys and five (5) feet on either side of the alleys. (Added by City Courtall on
January 25, 1994).
The draft Circulation Element of the proposed General Plan calls for an 18 foot wide
raised landscaped. median along Nicolas Road per City Standard No. 100.
Consequently, should Assessment District (AD) 1 61 not construct the median, the
Developer shall be required to construct the median along the property frontage or pay
the fair share cost of the improvements in lieu of construction of the improvements to
provide for the raised landscaped median par City Standard No. 100.
In the event that the Developer constructs the median, it shall accommodate a left turn
pocket into Roripsugh Road. The median shall be continuous at "A' Street to restrict
access to right turn in/out movement if the it is to remain at its currently designed
location. The median shall also be designed to accommodate a 150 foot left turn
pocket into Warbler Circle and "G" Entry Street and "D" Street and Nicolas Road
should the Developer choose to relocate the access to that location. If the median is
not constructed, the Developer shall accommodate the above by striping accordingly.
R:~TAPFRF~144PA93P.COA 2/14/9,4 Idb 12
63.
64.
65.
66.
67.
68.
69.
70.
71.
72.
Sufficient right-of-way along "G" Entry Street shall be dedicated for public use to
provide for a 60 foot full width right-of-way and shall be improved with concrete curb
and gutter located 18 feet on both sides of the centerline and 36 feet of asphalt
concrete pavement, or post bonds for the street improvements, as determined by the
Department of Public Works.
Sufficient right-of-way along "A", "B", "C", and the remainder of "G" Street shall be
dedicated for public use to provide for a 50 foot full width right-of-way including the
standard knuckle, and shell be improved with concrete curb and gutter located 18 feet
on both sides of the centerline and 36 feet of asphalt concrete pavement, or post
bonds for the street improvements, as determined by the Department of Public Works.
Sufficient right-of-way along "D" , · E" , and · F" Streets shall be dedicated for public use
to provide for a 46 foot full width right-of-way and shall be improved with concrete
curb and gutter located 16 feet on both sides of the centerline and 32 feet of asphalt
concrete pavement, or post bonds for the street improvements, as determined by the
Department of Public Works.
Sufficient right-of-way along the Alleys shall be dedicated for public use to provide for
a 20 foot full width right-of-way and the entire width shall be improved with concrete
pavement, or post bonds for the alley improvements, as determined by the Department
of Public Works.
The Developer shall file an application with TCSD for inclusion of the alleys within
Service Level 'R' to provide for the maintenance of the alleys.
Corner property line cut off shall be required per Riverside County Standard No. 805.
The Developer shall make a good faith effort .to acquire the required off-site property
interests, and if he or she should fail to do so, the Developer shall, prior to submittal
of the final map for recordation, enter into an agreement to complete the
improvements pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act, Section 66462 and Section
66462.5. Such agreement shall provide for payment by the Developer of all costs
incurred by the City to acquire the off-site property interests required in connection
with the subdivision. Security of a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash
deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the Developer, at the
Developer's cost. The appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to
commencement of the appraisal.
Vehicular access shall be restricted on Nicolas Road and so noted on the Final Map as
approved by the Department of Public Works.
A Signing and Striping plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and
approved by the Department of Public Works for Nicholas Road and shall 'be included
in the street improvement plans.
Prior to designing any of the above plans, contact the Department of Public Works for
the design requirements.
R:~TAFI~I~MI,AJJF.COA 2/14/94 !db 13
73.
74.
75.
76.
77.
78.
79.
80.
Bus bays and shelters shall be provided at locations as determined by Riverside Transit
Agency and the Department of Public Works.
The joint use driveway easements shall be shown on the Final Map. No building
permits for units with joint use shall be issued until the Final Map has been recorded,
Easements, when required for roadway slopes, landscape easements, drainage
facilities, utilities, etc,, shall be shown on the Final Map if they are located within the
land division boundary. All offers of dedication and conveyances shall be submitted
for review and recorded as directed by the Department of Public Works, On-site
drainage facilities located outside of road right-of-way shall be contained within
drainage easements and shown on the final map. A note shall be added to the final
map stating 'drainage easements shall be kept free of buildings and obstructions."
An Environmental Constraints Sheet (ECS) shall be prepared in conjunction with the
final map to delineate identified environmental concerns and shall be permanently filed
with the office of the City Engineer. A copy of the EC$ shall be transmitted to the
Planning Department for review and approval. The following information shall be on
the ECS.'
A. The delineation of the area within the 100-year floodplain.
The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an
Environmental Constraint Sheet recorded with any underlying maps related to the
subject property.
The Developer shall deposit with the Department of Public WOrks a cash sum as
established, per lot, as mitigation towards traffic signal impacts. Should the Developer
choose to defer the time of payment of traffic signal mitigation fee, he may enter into
a written agreement with the City deferring said payment to the time of issuance of
a building permit.
The Developer shall notify the City's cable TV Franchises of the Intent to Develop.
Conduit shall be installed to cable TV Standards at time of street improvements.
A declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&R's) shall be prepared by
the Developer and submitted to the Director of Planning, City Engineer, and City
Attorney. The CC&R's shall be signed and acknowledged by all parties having any
record title interest in the property to be developed, shall make the City a party
thereto, and shall be enforceable by the City. The CC&R's shall be reviewed and
approved by the City and recorded. The CC&R's shall be submitted to fie following
Engineering conditions:
A. The CC&R's shall be prepared at the Developer's sole cost and expense.
The CC&R's shall be in the form and content approved by the Director of
Planning, City Engineer, and the City Attorney, and shall include such provisions
as are required by this approval and as said officials deem necessary to protect
the interest of the City and its residents.
I~:~TAFFRP~I44PA93F.COA 2/14/94 Idb 14
The CC&R's shell be recorded concurrent with the Final Map. A recorded copy
shall be provided to the City.
De
The CC&R's shall provide for the effective establishment, operation,
management, use, repair and maintenance of all private areas,
The CC&R's shell provide that the property shall be developed, operated end
maintained so as not to create a public nuisance.
Fe
The CC&R's shall provide that if the property is not maintained in the condition
required by the CC&R's, then the City, after making due demand and giving
reasonable notice, may enter the property and perform, at the Owner's sole
expense, any maintenance required thereon by the CC&R's or the City
ordinances. The property shall be subject to a lien in favor of the City to secure
any such expense not promptly reimbursed.
Prior to Issuance of Building Permits
81.
A Precise Grading Plan shell be submitted to the Department of Public Works for
review and approval, The building pads shell be certified by a registered Civil Engineer
for location and elevation, and the Soils Engineer shall issue a Final Soils Report
addressing compaction and site conditions.
82.
Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code,
the approved grading plan, the conditions of the grading permit, City Grading
Standards and accepted grading construction practices. The final grading plan shall
be in substantial conformance with the approved rough grading plan.
83.
The Developer shall pay the Public Facilities and Services Mitigation Fee as per the
amended Development Agreement as reviewed and approved by the City.
Prior to Issuance of Certificates of Occupancy
84.
All improvements shall be completed and in place par the approved plans, including but
not limited to, curb and gutter, A.C, pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, drainage
facilities, parkway trees and street lights on all interior public streets,
85. All signing and striping shall be installed per the approved signing end striping plan.
86.
The traffic signal at Nicolas Road and Winchester Road shall be installed and
operational per the special provisions and the approved traffic signal plan.
87.
The Developer shall provide "stop" controls at the intersection of local streets with
arterial streets as directed by the Department of Public Works.
88.
Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersection and adjacent
to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance as directed by the Department of
Public Works.
89. Asphaltic emulsion (fog seal) shall be applied only as directed by the Department of
R:~TAFFRI~I44PA93F.COA 2Y14Y94 Idb 15
Public Works at a rate of 0.05 gallon per square yard. Asphalt emulsion shall conform
to Section Nos. 37, 39, and 94 of the State Standard Specifications.
90.
In the event that the required improvements on Nicolas Road along the property
frontage of this development are not completed by AD 161, the Developer shall
construct the required half width improvements per City Standard No. 100 or as
otherwise determined by the Department of Public Works.
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
General Requirements
91.
A Class II Bicycle Lane on Nicolas Road shall be designed and constructed in
conformity with the City's Park and Recreation Master Plan and in concurrence with
the completion of the street improvements.
92.
Construction of the public park site, perimeter landscaping and medians shall
commence pursuant to a pre-job meeting with the developer and the City Maintenance
Superintendent. Failure to comply with the TCSD review and inspection process may
preclude acceptance of these areas into the TCSD maintenance program.
93.
The developer, or the developer's successors or assignees, shall maintain the park site,
parkway landscaping and medians until such time as those responsibilities are accepted
by the TCSD.
94.
All parks shall be improved and dedicated to the City free and clear of any liens,
assessment fees, or easements that would preclude the City from utilizing the property
for public park purposes. A policy of title insurance and soils assessment report shall
also be provided with the dedication of the property.
95.
All perimeter walls, interior slopes and open space shall be maintained by the individual
property owners.
Prior to Recordation of the Final Map
96.
Prior to recordation of the first phase, the developer or his assignee shall enter into an
agreement and post security to improve lot number 163, a three (3) acre site, as a
public park facility, pursuant to City Ordinance No. 460.93 (Quimby). Lot No 163 shall
be identified as a public park site and offered for dedication to the City on the final
map.
97.
Prior to recordation of the final map, the subdivider shall post security and enter into
an agreement to improve the parkway landscaping and landscaped medians within
Nicolas Road right-of-way in conformance with the City of Temacula Landscape
Development Plan Guidelines and Specifications. All proposed slopes, landscaping and
medians intended for dedication to the TCSD shall be identified on the final map as a
proposed TCSD maintenance area.
R:~TAFPRR~I44PA93P.COA ~14/94 kJb 16
98.
Landscape construction drawings, consistent with the approved conceptual landscape
plans, for the public park site, parkway landscaping, and medians shall be reviewed
and approved by TCSD staff prior to recordation of the final map. Conceptual
landscape plans shall include a half-court basketball court, All paring apacea ahall be
eliminated from the park site design, (Added by City Council on January 25, 1994).
Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy
99.
Actual development and dedication of the park to the City shall be completed
prior to issuance of the 34th certificate of occupancy, or within eighteen
months of recordation of the first phase of the final map, whichever comes
first.
100.
Prior to issuance of any certificate of occupancy, the developer or his assignee shall
submit, in a format as directed by TCSD staff, the most current list of Assessor's
Parcel Numbers assigned to the final project.
OTHER AGENCIES
101.
The applicant shall comply with the environmental health recommendations outlined
in the Riverside County Health Department's transmittel dated July 27, 1993, a copy
of which is attached.
102.
The applicant shall comply with the flood control recommendations outlined in the
Riverside County Flood Control District's letter dated September 20, 1993, a copy of
which is attached. If the project lies within an adopted flood control drainage area
pursuant to Section 10.25 of City of Temecula Land Division Ordinance No. 460,
appropriate fees for the construction of area drainage facilities shall be collected by the
City prior to issuance of Occupancy Permits.
103.
The applicant shall comply with the fire improvement recommendations outlined in the
County of Riverside Fire Department's letter dated August 3, 1993, a copy of which
is attached.
104. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Eastern Municipal
Water District transmittal dated July 29, 1993, a copy of which is attached.
105. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Rancho California
Water District transmittal dated October 14, 1993, a copy of which is attached.
I~:~'TAFFRP'~I44PA93F. COA 2/14~s4 Idb 17
COUNTY' OF R.IVERSIDF, * HEALTH 5~;WICE5 AG=J',ICY
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
RECEIVED
CTrY OF TEME~ PLANNING DEPAKTMENT
43 174 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE
TEMECULA, CA 99_590
ATTN:
AUG 0 1993
R.E: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 27827: BEING A SUBDM SION OF A
PORTION OF LOTS 182 AND 183 OF THE TEMECULA LAND AND
WATER COMPANY, AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 8, PAGE 359
OF MAPS, SAN DIEGO COUNTY RECORDS, TOGETHER WITH THOSE
PORTIONS OF HAMILTON AFERUE, BANANA STREET, AND APRICOT
STREET, TOGETHER WITH A PORTION OF THE RANCHO TEMECULA
AS SHOWN PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 1, PAGE 37 OF PATENTS IN
THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY,
ALL BEING IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVEP, SIDE,
STATE OF CALIFORNIA.
(163 LOTS)
Dear Gentlemen:
The Deparnnent of Environmental Health has rmriewed Tentative Tract Map No.
27827 and recommends:
A water p/stem shall be h~qalled.acc ording to ph._~ and specifi cad. ons as a ove d
bv the witer cornpan and the Health D~parunent. P~xnnexit1 prints of ~el~lans
o~ the water system ';~all be subtinned in '_ _-n,!plicate, ~ a ?n~n~mum scale not less
than one incli e_qUals 200 feet, along with the original dry_wing to the City of
Tcmecula. The pi-in5 shall show the mmrnal p_ip_e diameter, locauon of valves and
fire hydrants; pi~e and 'oint Specifications, anii the size of the main at the junction
of th~ new svstem to ~e exiddng_ system. The lans sh,U comply in all re ects
with Div. 5, Part 1, Cha ter 7 of ~he California ~F;alth and SafeW Code, C-H~omia
Admjnj-qrafive Code ~e 11 Chapter 16, and General Order No. 103 of the
Public Utilities Commission of~he Stare of C,HFornia, when applicable. The plans
shall be signed by a re '_giStcred en'.gineer and water company With the following
ccrdficaon: "l cerd_fy that the design of the water systcm in Tract Map No.
27827 is in accordance with the water svst~m cxp~qon p ~m~ of the P, hncho
C-lffomia Water District and that the v/ater sentrees, storaz, and dism~bu~on
system will be adequate to provide water service to suah' Tna Map". This
c'dcation does not constiv, v~ a guarantee that it will _supply water to such Tra~
Map at any specific .quantifies flows or lm~c_ssures for fir~ tec'don or any other
conrpany. The plans must be $ubmitmffto the Ci~v o~emegula's Office to review
at least two w~eks tnior to the reouest for the re~oraaUon of the final ma~.
prg_viding s~ri-~aory financial arranScxneaxts arc c lctcd with the subdivider. It
~ be necessary for financial arran,zanents to be ~ prior to the recordati0n of'-
John M. Fanning, Director
4065 County Circle Drive * Riverside, CA 92503, Phone (909) 358-5316 * FAX (909) 358-5017
(Mailing Aaclrlss - P.O. Bo~ 7600 * RivemiOe, CA 92513-7600)
Pa~e 2
Ark SaiedNasseh
July 27, 1993
This subdivision is withh~ the w-~ter~ Muni~ Water Distri~ =d ~ be
~ca~.lS-ofzles. The p_hms s
· s~ver distiia with the f~Ib_wing,
s~wer syszm in Tract _Map No. 278'27 is in accord,m~e with the sewer system
~_xp,m-~ion pl'~'~ ct[ the ~ M~mieipal Wszer District anti that th~ waste
diSposal svstezn is aclequNe_ at t~ri_~ tizn~ to tresz the anti ' ated wastes from ·
It will be necessary for financial axran~_crnc~,~ to be cmnplctely ~n~li?ed prior to
rccordafion of the 'f:mal map.
Sincerely,
Sam Martincz, En~imml H~alth Specialist IV
SM:clr
(909) 275-8980
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND
WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
c:
'q- Zo- q'5
otsparcmrna~orsulxlivismnpnorto~ofme~najma;}- Feestobepaddahmjdlgeattmfaleinefiectat1~eljmeofrecordmmn,
or H deterFro:l. It the tirnl of isstanc~ of the g pelTIljt.
~;I, il:FIA! INFf~FI--ATIr'!N
C~ear~n~e~radin~m~~r~mer~na~p~r~v~d~h~u~dn~t~e~h~nun~meC~hasaeM~Md~~~~a
~qispmiectinvevesaFederalr.,.~a,qJencfM ~;;.,adAgency(FEMA)nappede_,e.~__!dain.~antheC3tYahoutdmquimmeal;;icamlo
~..,.wide all readies. r'~'d"~'tS, mer~tmhe~,b,,,,mmnretNimdmmeet FF, MA~ mmtm~addlurh'mrrecluimtmlhe maltaant
eOtmnaC4xsditionaJi.eRm'ofMapRevilon(CLOMR)Wim'togradng, r dal~ormherf~eill:q:womclfalmeeje~mrlclll'mmrOlb
Revimon (LOMR)' W to ~.
If a natural wmemexse ~r rnmnt:ed f -u:~- - Plam iz irnecled bY thiz Pm)e~ the C,~/ zheuld remm~ N lcljcml m ~ a ~ l~lll~
AgreemenllmmmeCalit~mDe;- b,.a.a~RshandGarneendaCienWmerAc~Seclk:naO4PmmitlmmtheU-S-ArmYC4aO~d
Etlgiral. a, orqm~ffllrl~.~,l.f4Mf"&rM. ~IM~III lig~i~thlP113ilCtlelllffl~b'iMIllhllef'-~' ,.,,f.d~ACleanWmerAC~ ~
· 404 Wamr Qu~Ca,fiificamm maybe mquire~trom me locad CaJilomia Regiond Wamr Quality Contml Bofd Wto ksstance°f the C°rps
ownership ot ~ tablilies on wfmefi requesI ot me "~, Faltit~$ must I~
it~zac~ will be r~luir~l tot Distm::l Immptmt~, Pt~n Cltme~ ir :r : ~n K
,~. .... ,.tl/r ...... w~ati~ns~ef mam mmea aife nefua~y~imi~ed~bems~aped~i=kaefem~me~:)im~k~indueing~:Nsm= Mamer[:kana~ Plan
lacilitms. om,r regional ~.__,~4_ ,,~,.~.,,; and drainage facidas whk=h endd b, ,/.,f '-'u.,d · legiod ,,,.-,,~ ,.it er --r -' ~ ot · ff,-..mr I=tan symen.
and Divric~mm OrmnaO, Ftan feas(d--N~-I= ,..,.a ,,_'l~] -'~fees).ln adddon, kdr,,,dlke et mgenerd natm i, lnfovidet
TheDism~hasnmreviewedlhelxmxmeclpmje~indemilmdN.kd_hek~dqm:ked,,~, .... fdbdonotinEnyweymm=itumorim~y~
am:~va~=ran~t. · .... aotm~lummomimm=wtmmmM~m--m~--haml.lad~hulmamlmlmyem/°ttmrsumissue:
RIVERSt.DE o,,.../t
RIVERSIDE COUNTY -.
FIRE DEPART "
~TTEN:
Temecula Planning Department
Tentativ~ Tract ~T817
August
With respect to the conditions of approval for the aDove refer-
enced ian~ =ivi,,ion, the Fire Department recommends the following
fire ~rotection measures be provide~ in accordance ~ith Riverside
County Ordinances and/or recognized fire protection ,,tanOarOs:
i. Sc~ecuie A fire ~rot~cti~n. An aoQroved ,,tan~ar-~ fire
.~r~n=~, (&.">~"x2 I./2'') io=ated one at each street intersection
~n= ~s~=~ no more than ~0 feet apart or no Deftion ~f lot
..... ~._~= more than 155 feet from a hydrant. Minimum fire flow
~nail De I000 SPM for 2 hour~ duration at 20 PSI.
2. A:mlicant/deveiooer snail furni,,h one c=.~y of the water plane
=~ the Fire Deoar~ment for review. Plan,, shall De --igned De a
reci~t~red civil engineer, c---nt~ining a Fire Department adDroYal
~i~nature ~i~ck. an~ M~al! conform ~o hydrant type, location,
sDacin~ and minimum fire flow. Once Qlane are ~igned by the local
water company', the original-- shale De presented to the Firs
Deoartmen~ for signature.
Blue dot reflectors shall be mounted in private street-- and
~r~veway~ to indicate location of fire hydrants. They shall be
mounte~ in the middle of the street directly in line with fire
4. The reOuired water mystem, including fire hydrants, Ehall be
in~=alle~ an~ accs~ted Dy the a~pro:rlate water agency prior t,=
any --omou~ti~ie Duil~ing materlz~l being place~ on an in;ividual
lot.
'~ RIVERSIDE OFFICE
37~0 12lh Sm~k Rivmiag. CA g~,501
(gOg) ,'~/547?/* FAX ~)0~) 3~1451
HRE PREVENTION DIVISION
H.ANNING'SECTION
:D INDIO OFFIC:/
'/9*733 C~. ¢=lub Drivr, .Seine F. i~. CA
1619) 863-1116 · FAX 1619) 863*'7072,
5. Pri~r tc the rec=r=ati~n Df the f~n~ maD? the Uevtl~Der
~n&ll .oeDoE~t, with the City of Temecu~a? a ;alh ium of ~400.00
Der ~ot/un~t. a; mitigmtiDn for fire prote;tSon im~a:t~. ShoulC
the develooer chooee to Uefer the ~imm of Daym~nt, he/~ne may
enter into a written agreement ~ith the =ounty oeferr~ng saia
~ayment to the time ~f im~uance ~f the first builoing mermlt.
ferred t~ the Planning and Engineering Staff.
RAYMOND H. REGIS
Chief Fire DeDartment Planner
Laura Cabtel:
Fire Safety SQeclali--t
jF,,~istern ./YkunicipaL W at er ]tJiszrict
iuly 29, 1993
RECEIVED
Saied Naaseh, Case Planner
City of Temecv~n
Manning Depamn~t
43 I74 Buaincs Park Drive
Tcm~cula, CA 92590
SUBJECT: Tract 27827 (PA 93-0144)
Dear Mr. Naaseh::
We have reviewed the r~nt. eri~is trarlsmi~ by your office which describe the subject project
Our comments are outlined below:
General
It is our understanding me subject project is a proposal to subdivide 22.5 acres located between
Nicolas Ed. and the Santo Gern'udis Crc~ at the northwest corner of the inmrsection of Nicolas
and North General K~.rney Rch., into 163 sin~e family residential lots with alleys and a 3.0
acre park site.
The subject project is located within the District's sanitary sewer service area. However, k must
bc undustood the available service capabilities of the Dhuict's system are continually changing
due to the occurrence of development within the Disuict and proEmms of systems improvement.
As such, the provision of ~m-vice will be based on the defiled plan of service requirements, the
timing of the subject project, the staun of the Disuia's permit to operate, and the service
agreement between the District and the developer of the subject project.
The developer must arrange for the ~on of a de~il,.~ plan of service. The detailed plan.
of service win in,fic~,e the location(s) and size(s) of system improvements to be .made by the
developer (or others), and which are considered neces~,,7 in order w provide adequate leveh
of service. To arrange for the prepan~on of a plan of service, the developer should submit
information describing the subject project to the Disuia's Cuswmer Service Department, (909)
925-7676, extension 409, as follows: . .
lvlsil To: Pos: Office Boz 8500 · SanJscimo, California ~2~81-8300 · Tdepbone 609) ~25-7676 · Pax (909) ~-02~7
Mare Off~:: 204~ S. $aa Jginm Avmug,$m~Jgiam · C.,.-ome-~/r-.l;,',---:f~Ams=: 440 F_ O~khml A~mae, Hema, C.A
City of Tm~ula
Tract 27827
July 29, 1993
Page 2
'Wzitmn request for a 'plan of service'.
l~f. mimum ~00.00 deposit ~ ~sits may be requir~ for extensive
development projects or projects loci,e6 in 'cliffjc,,!t to sen, e' geographic areas).
P]zns/mz~os describing the exact lontion and nalxu'e of the subject project.
Eipecially helpful rnnr~i~!s inc.2ucie graciing plans and phasing plans.
Ranitnrv ,~ewer
The subjca l:rwje~'t is considered tributary to the Di,~i~'s Tcrnccula Valley Pegions/Wat~
l'teclama~n F~ty CrVRI,VP, F) :
The nearest existing TVRWRF system sanitary sewer facilities to the subject project are as
follows:
15-inch diameter gravity-flow sewer aligned along Nicolas Rd. between Roripaugh and
North General Keamey Rds.
Other L~sues
The District requires that onsite sewers be located within the proposed public roadways and not
alle.vways.
Should you have any questions regarding these comments, please feel free to contact this offxce
at (909) 925-7676, extension ,~68.
Very. truly yours,
EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT
David G. Crosley ~ce
Senior,Engineer-Customer ,~
Department
DGC/ck
AB 93-835
(wl~mwk-'ri~?Sl? .clz)
SZ~T Ry:TFM~na~
Ik
1anne ear
;10-14-83; 13:02;
9096946477;~ 2/3
Mz. SaicdNaa~
City afTm'm~d-
!'h...;.~ IX4,m,~---t
43174 ;-~,.-~ Park f)tive
Te-~-c-;% CA 92590-3606
SUBJECt: Taut No. 27827
The ,-~-Hn!~ RCWD water stom~ and distn'bufon systcm may aot bc ndequa~c
to provide dm,,,-,,;,- wnmr rex1 ~z¢ pmtmtimt m-via:s to Ow p,,,pc,~ xcfuk..~d
above ~th~/~_~,,,~ .... ,~, Dbtric( No. 161 (AD-16D. ~ following inRn-msfion
iS int,~mI,A to explnin tbc Di.qlzict's ptaitionin providing~mtcr~n-vice to thisIron,
Tlu: funn~ orw=z~ service withl- AD-161 is dcp~,~ qxm/hc prc, a,... ty ownc~
nnd the County of Rivcrsidc approving sul~l~,dml finnncing of w'J~r fr.:n'li~es
to scrvicc the pmp=ttics within RCWD boundaric~
sysmm can st;port ~a;~.,,,s doveloln~ prior to d~e co..~.ud~on
water supply b~-;ihl,-s. Bascd upon an -,Idit;Onn! hydrddic m,~hysis perFormed by
Trans-Pacil"~ P .=;n, . :qg ~ and acnm] rmid ~zc flow msLt, Ih=
mmsupportmaddiTion/maxinmmd~yfiowof40011~. 'Ibis flow
· q,,-,.'~ to ~ 380 tzidml t ~;,~ zmils a~ 115 acres of co, m,,..,,.~l
dovr;lopmmt or a n>mbination oftruth. 't"n~g som~ ~,-:t~iom to
1.150-foot ci.-vatioa am/~a,,..-dal dc~~t is rnnit=d to pmper6=s along
tbc W;~-h~,. Ra~l r4midor at elevatio,s mm~r L.125 feel Uadcr
mm/iao~ ttm Dimrim c3n m=~ ~c z~~ daqy 4c ...... ac iacluding
flow ell,000 lpmutltb=cc~memial ~ ~-whindudi~amaziamm
· . __ .....
m ' ~"'' ' Imlmellmlmksl
, ~'lanninz Deparnnent
0etober 14, 1993
PaF Two
The District will m:~-!X a~mff ~1~1{~"~ m~ a~~-~ ~ ~~ m~ ~~
fi~el~~~~ ~~~fm~~~l~~t
mc ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ f~ ~ ~'~ m ~~ of ~ ~ ~ ~
~p~ ~
For them protgr~m thnl tgqugg sm'vim aagr ~ avm'lablc gapm:ity is dc4i~i,,,4 of if tlmy do not nazi
thc elevation conditions stated above, th= ~tm of the impl,---~",,g ~ idzmi~mt for Ar~
15I will bc req'mred prim'm instalhlion of the me2z~s=.vice. Thos~k .... :j~ting f'~ilitics nr~ ~
below:.
I. A 54-inch wamr nmin, parAid In W;,,- -~,.~'~r Rand, rtttn 1-15 Io Matgsrila Road;
A DS0 Pressur~ Zon~ Immp slation nenf ~ kdx.,~da.iitm o[ ~ Rmmd nnd ~~
Ro~;
A wsmr main in l~mrprita ~ tint i~ 30 incjms in ,4;-,,,,4,.r from ttg pusup marion to Rami~
Glen Drive, 30 inclu= to Dnt= ~ ..,,d 30 inchea along Dam S~ to Witu:hest=- Road;
24-inch waterline from thc intcnection of Margadta Road and Wipeh,.~,,,- Road to North
Kenmy Road:
5. A corm~tion ~o ZIg 13SO Pr~sut~ Zot~ nt North Gtmmal Kmmy Read and Nitrains Road.
As ~ above., it may be ~-cc--,ey ibr fig devdoper to upgtad~ tl~ e.~ri-~nf wamr sysu:m to pmvi&:
sufficient prt:mu~ for dorr~"~c nnd l'Ire i~,,,ta:tion Ianlmm~ It nmy also he n~'~:e.,.-..y for the dgvdo~
u> install off-site facilities to mot the demands of this t~,a~-,ty. Howgv~, this does not mnstimte a
gumantee thnz RCWD wall sut~ly warn- to said pat'c~ at my slgdfxe quantity, flow, or lm:ssum for tim
protection or for nny oth~. ~ W'dl~- nvnilnbHhy would b~ conii~ent upon ti~ pu!~Aty ownn'
sil,ming an Agency Ag,.z.,~.jxt ~ nsd~ ~ mn~,~.dl ~ if nny, to RCWD.
! r you sixodd hnve any ques6nn~ plms~ conlant m,
Sinc~rdy,
RANClIO CI~L!~-'ORNIA WATI!R DISTRICT
Sentra Dolgt~, Eng;,~,.. ;,q~ Tcehnic~',q
ITEM NO. 19
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY ATI'ORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning
February 22, 1994
General Plan Consistency Handbook
PREPARED BY:
David W. Hogan, Associate Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
It is requested that the City Council:
ADOPT Resolution No. 94- entitled:
"A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVING THE GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY HANDBOOK'
BACKGROUND:
In the process of beginning to implement the City's new General Plan, a number of questions
have been raised concerning the issue of consistency with the newly adopted General Plan.
As a result, Staff has prepared the attached Handbook to provide a standard methodology to
guide implementation of the Plan.
DISCUSSION:
The purpose of the General Plan Consistency Handbook is to provide a standard methodology
for determining whether or not a proposed development project, ordinance or program is
consistent with the City General Plan. The Handbook has been designed so that as the
programs are implemented, they can be incorporated into this procesS. The General Plan
Consistency Handbook has been prepared using the following references:
·
l
·
The 1993 State Planning, Zoning and Development Laws;
The State of California General Plan Guidelines; and
The adopted City General Plan.
To facilitate the use of the Handbook, all the Goals in the General Plan, as well as the policies
relating to the Village Center Concept have been included as Attachments. A copy of the
Handbook is included in Attachment No. 1 to this Staff Report. The draft Handbook was
considered by the Planning Commission on February 7, 1994. The Commission suggested
that additional language, which has been added, to clarify how inapplicable or unrelated goals
and policies are addressed during the consistency process. A copy of the Planning
Commission Resolution and Staff Report are included in Attachments 3 and 4, respectively.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:
The proposed Handbook will provide a standard methodology for implementing the adopted
General Plan for the City of Temecula. As a result, approval and use of this Handbook does
not have the potential to cause a significant adverse impact on the environment and is exempt
from California Environmental Quality Act.
FUTURE GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY:
The General Plan Consistency Handbook will ensure consistent implementation of the City's
General Plan; as a result, approval of this Handbook is cons. latent with the General Plan.
FISCAL IMPACT:
No additional fiscal impact or cost, beyond minimal copying costs, are anticipated as a result
of the approval of the General Plan Consistency Handbook.
Attachments:
2.
3.
4.
General Plan Consistency Handbook - Page 3
Resolution No. 94- - Page 4
Resolution No. PC 94-02 - Page 7
Planning Commission Staff Report - Page 8
R:~HOOAND~OPCH.CCI 2/14/94
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY HANDBOOK
R:~ttOOAND~OPCH. CCI 2/14/94 edl 3
City of Temecula
GENERAl, PLAN CONSISTENCY HANDBOOK
January 2.0, 1994
Pr~pm-e~ by:
Advance Planning Division
Planning Department
City of Tcmccula
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION
1.1
1.1
1.t
1.4
1.5
1.6
1.7
PURPOSE 1 "
ROLE OF THE GENERAL PLAN IN LOCAL GOVERNMI~',rr .................. 1
WHAT IS GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY?. ............................. 1
WHAT GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY ............................... 2
WHAT GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY IS NOT .......................... 3
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE GENERAL PLAN AND OTHER PLANS .......... 3
NEW DIRECTIONS IN THE GENERAL PLAN ............................ 4
DETERMINATION
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
2.5
2.6
OF CONSISTENCY ............ 5
GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY IN THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCESS BEFORE THE
DEVELOPMENT CODE IS APPROVED ................................. 5
GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY IN THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCESS AFTER THE
DEVELOPMENT CODE IS APPROVED ................................. 6
GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY AND THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCESS .... 6
GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY IN STAFF AND AGENDA REPORTS .......... 15
GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY IN RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES ........ 15
OTHER AGENCY CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN ............... 15
CONCLUSION .................................... 16
APPENDICES
A. LIST OF GENERAL PLAN GOALS BY ELEMENT ........................ 18
B. POLICIF_,S IMPLEMENTING THE VILLAGE CENTER CONCEPT ............... 24
Genera/P/an ~ H~
INTRODUCTION
The purpose of the General Plan Consistency Handbook is to provide a standard
methodology for determining whether or not a proposed development project,
ordinance or program is consistent with the City General Plan. This methodology
is intended to provide a minimum threshold for determining general plan
consistency. As additional programs and processes are adopted, the consistency
process will change.
1.2 ROI ,~. OF ~ GENERAL PIAN IN LOCAL GOVERNMENT
The General Plan is the City's overriding long-term development and activity policy
document. The future vision for the community in the General Plan is provided in
the goals and policies contained within each element. According to State Law, the
General Plan is supposed to be the City's ultimate source in determining what a
community's long-term objectives are. According to the Governor's Office of
Planning and Research, all governments engaging in land use planning must base
their official regulatory land use, development, and subdivision controls on the
goals, policies and programs identified in the Plan.
The Goals in the General Plan are intended to provide a general intent or purpose
toward which the City will direct its efforts. The Policies under each Goal are
intended to provide a specific statement of principle to guide or direct governmental
decision making. Most of the detail in the General Plan is located in the policy
statements.
1.3 WHAT IS GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY?
The term "General Plan Consistency" has two different meanings. The first
meaning is the requirement that all the elements of the general plan be internally
consistent. The second meaning refers to the need for all development approvals
and City programs to be consistent with the goals and policies contained in the
adopted general plan.
Internal consistency means that all elements of the Plan must be based upon the
same assumptions and conditions. It also means that each clement must be
complimentary to and integrated with every other element. This requirement applies
to all elements, whether mandatory and optional, which have been adopted by the
City Council. This form of consistency is also very important when considering
General Plan Amendments.
The second meaning of General Plan Consistency is the requirement for all land use ~'
and planning decisions, as well as other City programs, to be consistent with the
adopted general plan. According to established legal precedent, the fundamental
rule for determining the consistency of a governmental action, program, or project
with the Gencral Plan is as follows: "
'... when considering all of a projea's aspects, does it further the goals,
objectives and policies of the general plan and (at a minimum) not obstrua
their attainment or realization ?'
This very broad and far-reaching statement has significant implications on City
operations and the development review process. Being consistent with the General
Plan does not mean being consistent or compatible with just the Land Use Map or
a single policy. It means being in compliance with the Vision of the Future
described in the General Plan (taken as a whole) and any individual elements.
For many projects and programs, the majority of the goals and policies in the
General Plan will not apply. In those cases when a policy statement (or goal) does
not apply to a project or activity, that project is considered to be consistent with the
General Plan as long as it does not adversely impact or impair the furtherance of the
value(s) stated in the policy.
1.4 WHAT GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY IS
When a Goal or Policy potentially applies to a specific project or action, the
proposed project must be consistent with the General Plan. Listed below are several
examples of what General Plan consistency is.
Adopting a specific program described in the Implementation Measur~ of any
General Plan Element.
Having a specific Implementation Program action stating that a particular
action should occur or function should be undertaken.
Having Goals and Policies in several elements of the General Plan which have
some relationship to a project or action, stating that the action should occur or
that the particular issue should be considered and which is not contradicted by
any other Goals or Policies.
When a Goal or Policy does not apply or relate to a proposed project, the project
is considered to be consistent with the General Plan if the project does not adversely
impair or impact the accomplishment of the Plan's long-term vision for the future.
2
WHAT GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY IS NOT
When attempting to explain General Plan consistency, it is often easier to describe
what it is not rafter than what it is. Listed below are a number of examples of what
General Plan consistency i$J!9.I.
Interpreting a goal or policy in a way which is inconsistent with the other
goals, policies, maps, diagrams, or text of the Plan.
Using a policy statement that when taken out of context, could be loosely
interpreted to support or justify a project.
Interpreting an individual element in a way which is inconsistent with the other
elements of the Plan.
Considering one or more elements to be either superior or subordinate, to any
other element(s) in the Plan.
1.6 RELATIONSraP BETWEEN THE GENERAL PLAN AND OTI~R PLANS
Before the actual consistency process is discussed, the issue ofinter-plan consistency
needs to be addressed. All City approved, or amended, specific and master plans
must be consistent with the General Plan, just like any other development
application, program or function. If the proposed or amended plans are not
consistent with the adopted General Plan, the inconsistent components of those plans
may not be adopted. This standard also applies to the Parks and Recreation Master
Plan and the Old Town Specific Plan.
The Parks and Recreation Master Plan has been integrated with the General Plan
through Open Space and Conservation Element Goals 1 and 8. The Old Town
Specific Plan has been integrated with the General Plan through Land Use Element
Goal 6 and Open Space and Conservation Element Goal 6. All development
applications, programs, and activities must be consistent with these other documents.
When the Old Town Specific Plan or the Parks and Recreation Master Plan does not
address a specific relevant issue, the direction contained in the General Plan is the
guiding factor or principle.
1.7 NEW DIRECTIONS IN THE GENERAL PLAN
The City General Plan contains a number of changes which will affect the current
development review process. These changes represent departures from the City's
(and County's) standard approaches to planning and development. These changes
may also be the most difficult components of the Plan to implement.
The major changes which will result from the adoption of the General Plan are
highlighted below.
%
The active encouragement of clustered commercial development (often in
neighborhood and village centers) and the discouragement of automobile
oriented strip commercial development.
The preservation of local environmental, aesthetic and biologic resource areas
into permanent open space areas.
The requirement that all development incorporate bike and trail network
components into their designs. This includes connections to adjacent
residential, commercial, and employment centers.
The requirement for non-automobile oriented development in and around the
Village Centers.
The implementation of development and design standards for special areas
within the community including: individual neighborhood and community
areas, Village Centers, the south Highway 79 corridor, large lot, semi-rural
residential communities, and hillside areas.
The prevention of development in any floodway and the minimizing of
development into floodplain and the use of non-structural methods for flood
control whenever possible.
4
Genera/P/an Cons/mncv Handbook
DETERMINATION OF CONSISTENCY
GENERAL H. AN CONSISTENCY IN THF~ DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
PROCESS BEFORE THE DEVELOPMF~NT CODE IS APPROVED
The period prior to the adoption of the Development Code will be a very difficult
time for the City. We will be trying to review development projects for their
consistency with the General Plan while using a partially inconsistent Zoning
Ordinance. The key to successfully navigating this treacherous ground is to take
extra time in the review process and carefully examine the Goals and Policies in the
General Plan.
The Plan contains several items which represem a departure from the City's
previous approach to planning and development. These changes in direction are
highlighted in Section 1.7 of this Handbook.
The Consistency process contained in this Handbook is used to determine whether
a project is consistent with the General Plan. The Pre-Developmcnt Code
consistency process is the same as described in Section 2.3 of this Handbook. The
main points to remember during this period are as follows:
Before any development project, specific plan, development agreement,
subdivision map or time extension is approved, the decision making body must
find that the project is consistent with the City General Plan.
Even when the project was consistent with a former county ordinance, the
Southwest Area Plan, or any policy, tradition, practice or procedure, the
project cannot be approved if it is inconsistent with the. adopted City General
Plan.
It is not important what previous City policy was; if the General Plan disagrees
with this former policy, then the former policy is inconsistent and is no longer
valid in the decision making process.
When the strict interpretation of the City Zoning code would create an
inconsistency with any goals or policies in the General Plan, the General Plan
is AI-WAYS the controlling document.
For tenant improvements and business licenses in existing buildings, review the
proposed use and its conformity with the Land Use Designation identified on the
Land Use Map. If the proposed land use is consistent with the General Plan Land
Use Designation, it meets the General Plan consistency test.-
5
Note: The Business Park (BP) and Very Low Density Residential (RL) Land Use
Designations will be implemented by several zones in the future Development Code.
Before the draft zoning map is available for public review, if the use is permitted
in either zone, then it is probably consistera with the General Plan.
After the draft Development Code and zoning map are available for public review,
it will become easier to determine General Plan consistency for tenant improvements
and business licenses. This determination process will be even easier after the draft
Development Code and Zoning Map are approvod by the Planning Commission.
GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY IN ~ DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
PROCESS AFTER THE DEVELOPMENT CODE IS APPROVED
After the Development Code has been approvod, the process for determining
General Plan consistency will become easier. Because the Development Code must
be consistent with the General Plan, meeting the development requirements in the
Development Code also ensures the consistency of a project with the City General
Plan. Complete consistency requires a propc,~td project to be consistent with the
Development Code and the consistency guidelines described in Section 2.3 of this
Handbook.
C, enerd Plan consistency review, like the Iniad Environmental Study, must
be done early in the process before completeness is determined and prior to
the first Development Review Comm.'.atee meeting.
GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY AND THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
PROCESS
These guidelines are not intended to provide an exhaustive list of issues to consider
or a single all-reaching method to follow when reviewing a project for consistency
with the General Plan. Instw_d, it is intended to provide a process for determining
general consistency of any planning application with the City General Plan and is
based solely upon the Goals contained in the General Plan. It is very important that
the specific policies be used to evaluate the consistency of a project or activity with
the General Plan. The City General Plan contains 63 broad goal statements that
provide overall intent for nearly 350 specific policy statements. The need to be
familiar with the Goals and Policies in the General Plan cannot be overstated. The
basic General Plan consistency process consists of the following steps:
Initial PrOject Screening. Review the application to determine what type of
project is being proposed, where it is located, and what the local conditions
and issues are in the vicinity of the project.
6
m
Initial Goals SeTcoping. Review the Goal statements within the Plan to identify
possible areas of compatibility and inconsistency. For example:
Does the project appear to support the accomplishment of the goal; or,
does the goal not apply or relate to the proposetl project?
· Does the project appear to be contrary or counter productive to the goal?
A list of the Goals is included in Appendix A of this Handbook. A list of the
Policy statements which implement the Village Center Concept is included in
Appendix B.
Land Use Issues. Use the Land Use and Air Quality Elcmcnts to dcterminc
if the proposed project is consistent with the Plan. Specifically, is it consistent
with the:
Land Use Designation. Are the land uses in the proposed project
consistent with the Land Use Designation on the Land Use Map?
Land Use Element policies and programs. Will the project result in:
An ideal mix of residential, commercial, industrial, recreational,
cultural, public and open spaces in the village centers?
A City of diversified development character where rural and
historic areas are protected and co-exist with newer urban
development?
iii. The protection and enhancement of residential neighborhoods?
iv. The preservation and enhancement of local environmental and
biologic resources?
Vs
The prevention of development in any floodway and the minimizing
of development in floodplain?
vi. A land use pattern that encourages public transit, bicycling and
walking?
The encouragement of clustered commercial development and the
discouragement of automobile oriented strip commercial
development?
7
Genera/P/an Conanencv H~
viii. The support of reffional land use ~rowth patterns contained in the
appropriate regional and subregional plans?
C. Air Quality Element policies and programs. Will the project result in:
i. A future land use pattern which will result in improved air quality
(and the enhanced use of public and other alternative forms of
transportation) in Temecula?
ii. The implementation of the needed transportation control measures?
D. Village Center concept. Will the project result in:
i. A project consistent with the Village Center Concept?
ii. A project which encourages the use of non-automotive modes of
transportation in the every day life of local residents?
iii. The integration of residential, commercial, industrial, recreational,
cultural, public, and open spaces land uses in a manner which will
reduce the number of future vehicle trips?
E. Old Town Specific Plan. If the project is located in Old Town, is it
consistent with the Goals, Objectives, Development Standards, and
Design Guidelines?
F. Parks and Recreation Master Plan objectives and requirements?
Envirovm,..ntnl Constraints. Resource and Safety Issues. Use the Open
Space/Conservation, Public Safety, Air Quality, and Noise Elements to
determine if the proposed project is consistent with the Plan. Is the project
located in any of the following environmental constraint or issues areas?
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
An Alquist-Priolo Special Study Zone.
An identified liquefaction zone.
A dam inundation area.
A 100 or 500 Year Floodplain.
A Wildland Fire area.
An area with significant biological resources.
A 65-CNBL noise area.
The Area of Influence for the French Valley Airport.
The Mount Palomar Lighting District.
8
Genera/P/an Cor. s/stencv H~
Specifically, is the project consistent with the:
A.
Open Space and Conservation Element policies and programs.
project result in:
Will the
i. The protection and conservation of surface, Found, and imported
water resources?
ii. The conservation of important biological habitats, species, and
wildlife corridors?
iii.The conservation of open space areas for a balance of recreation,
scenic enjoyment, and protection of natural resources and features?
iv. The protection of prime agricultural land from premature
conversion to urbanized uses?
v. The preservation of significant historical and cultural resources?
vi. The protection of dark skies from intrusive light sources which may
impact the Palomar Observatory?
vii. The preservation of local environmental, aesthetic and biologic
resource areas into permanent open space areas?
viii. Preventing development in the floodway and reducing development
in any floodplain?
Public Safety Element policies and programs. Wffi the project result in:
i. The protection of the public from geologic instability, seismic
events and flooding hazards?
ii. The protection of the public from hazardous materials and waste?
Circulation Element policies and programs. Does the project:
i. Need to provide a General Plan designated roadway?
ii. Result in a truck transportation network which minimizes noise and
air pollution impacts?
9
e
Genera/P/an Ctm. stmnev Handbook
Air Quality Element policies and programs. Will the project result in
enhanced mobility and reduced air pollution emissions?
Noise Element policies and proFares. Will the project result in:
i. Improved separation between significant noise generators and
sensitive receptors?
ii. The control and reduction of noise between different land uses?
iii. The reduction of noise impacts from transportation sources?
Parks and Recreation MEter Plan objectives and requirements?
Housing Issues. If housing is to be provided or removed as a result of the
proposed project, use the Housing Element to determine if the proposed project
is consistent with the Plan. A key question to consider is: does the project
support implementation of the City housing program?
Specifically, is the project consistent with the Housing Element policies and
programs? Will the project result in:
A wide range of affordable housing opportunities for all income
groups?
The removal of governmental constraints to the maintenance,
improvement and development of housing?
iii. The conservation of the existing affordable housing stock?
iv. Equal housing opportunity for all residents in Temecula?
PrOject Desitm and Layout. Use the Community Design, Air Quality,
Circulation, Noise, and Land Use Elements to determine if the proposed
project is consistent with the Plan. Is the project located in any of the
following special design standard areas?
The Old Town Area.
The South 79 Office/Commercial corridor.
The Winchester/Ynez Village Center.
The Town Center Plaza area.
An entry gateway or corridor.
·
·
·
·
·
lO
· A rural community.
· A billside area.
Specifically, is the project consistent with the:
A.
Community Design Element policies.
i.
Will the project result in:
The enhancement of the City's image related to its regional and
natural setting and its tourist orientation?
ii. Design excellence in the site planning, architecture, landscape
architecture and signage?
iii. The preservation and enhancement of the positive qualities in
individual districts or neighborhoods?
iv. A streetscape system that provides a cohesive community image?
v. The protection of the public's view of significant natural features?
vi. The maintenance and enhancement of public spaces and resources?
vii. Community gathering areas which provide social, civic, cultural
and recreational opportunities?
B. Community Design Plans.
i.
ii.
nl.
C. Air Quality Element policies and programs.
i.
Will the project implement the:
Appropriate local and/or citywide community design concepts?
Interconnection of open space areas?
Village Center concept?
Will the project result in:
The enhanced use of public and other alternative forms of
transportation?
The implementation of the needed transportation control measures?
11
Circulation Element policies and programs. Will the project result in:
i. A Level of Service 'D * or better during peak hours?
ii. A Level of Service 'C' or better during non-peak hours? "
iii. Enhanced traffic safety on City streets?
iv. A regional transportation system that safely and efficiently moves
goods and people?
v. An adequate supply of parking?
vi. Alternatives to motorized travel throughout the City?
vii. A safe and efficient truck circulation system?
viii. Encouraging the use of alternative forms of transportation including
public transit, bicycling and walking?
Open Space and Conservation Element policies and programs.
project result in:
i. The conservation of energy resources?
ii. The conservation of open spaces?
iii. A high quality park and recreation system?
iv. A trail system that serves both recreational and transportation
needs?
Noise Element policies and programs. Will the project result in:
i. The separation of significant noise generators and sensitive receptor
areas?
ii. The control of noise between land uses?
iii. The consideration of noise issues in the planning process?
iv. Minimizing noise impacts from transportation sources? '~
Wffi the
12
G. Land Use Element policies and programs. Will the project result in:
The encouragement of alternate modes of transportation, including
public transit, bicycling, and walking?
ii. The implementation of the village center concept?
H. Parks and Recreation Master Plan objectives and requirements?
Public Facilities and Infrastructure. use the Growth Management/Public
Facilities, Circulation, and Open Space and Conservation Elements to
determine if the proposed project is consistent with the Plan. Specifically, is
the project consistera with the:
A. Growth Management/Public Facility Elemem policies and programs.
Will the project result in:
An effective and cost efficient sheriff, fire, and emergency medical
service within the City?
Adequate facilities which support the community's social, cultural,
civic, religious, and recreational needs?
iii. A water and waste water infrastructure system which supports
existing and future development?
iv. An effective, safe, and environmentally compatible flood control
system?
A safe and efficient solid waste collection, transportation, recycling
and disposal system?
vi. An adequate electric, natural gas, and telecommunication system?
vii. The incorporation of bike and pedestrian trail network components
in all projects?
Open Space and Conservation Element policies and programs. Will the
project result in:
i. A high quality park and recreation system?
13
A trail system that serves both recreational and transportation
needs?
o
iii. The implementation of the Park and Recreation Master Plan?
Bconomic Develqpment. Regional Growth. and Jobs:Housinf Issues. Use the
Air Quality, Housing, Growth Management, and Economic Development
Elcmcnts to determine if the proposed project is consistent with the Plan.
Specifically, is the project consistent with the:
Growth Management/Public Facility Element policies and programs.
Will the project result in:
An orderly and efficient pattern of growth that enhances the quality
of life?
The cooperative management of growth among local governments
within Riverside County?
Economic Development Element policies and programs. Will the project
result in:
The diversification of the local economy to include a range of
"clean' manufacturing, retail and service activities?
ii. The maintenance of a sound financial foundation for City
government?
Establish a diverse education and training and job placement system
which will develop and maintain a high quality work force in
Tcmccuh?
iv. The promotion of the advantages to doing business in Tcmecula?
v. The development of Temecula as a comprehensive and recognizable
tourist destination center?
Air Quality Element policies and programs. Will the project result in
the use of transportation system management and demand management
strategies?
14
D. Land Use Element policies and programs. Will the project result in:
i. The orderly annexation and development of unincorporated areas?
The support of regional land use growth patterns contained in the
approp, late regional and subregional plans?
2.4 GENERAL PLAN.CONSISTENCY IN STAFF AND AGENDA REPORTS
When preparing Staff Reports to the Planning Commission and Agenda Reports to
the City Council the heading of Village Center Concept should always included
immediately following the General Plan Consistency heading. This addition will
further integrate the Village Center Concept into the decision making process within
the City. Consistency with the Village Center Concept is also very important when
considering any future General Plan Amendments.
GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY IN RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
Like development and capital improvement program projects, City ordinances and
resolutions need to be consistent with the long-term vision for the future contained
in the General Plan. This consistency finding will generally be located in the
whereas or finding sections of the ordinances and resolutions. It is recommended
that the appropriate General Plan references always be included in ordinances and
resolutions. This will provide an additional basis and foundation for the City's
action and can be useful if the ordinance or resolution is later challenged in a court
of law.
2.6 OTHER AGENCY CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN
Section 65403(c) of State Planning and Zoning Law requires that each special
district, uni~ed,.clementary and high school district, and joint powers agency which
constructs or maintains public facilities essential to the growth and maintenance of
an urban population must submit its capital improvement program to the City for a
determination of its consistency with the City's General Plan. The capital
improvement program must be submitted to the City at least 60 days prior to its
proposed adoption by the governing body of that special district.
According to State Law, the local agency or district may not carry out any part of
its capital improvement program if the City has determined that it is inconsistent
with the City General Plan, or any other applicable plan. However, the district or
local agency may overrule the City's finding and carry out its capital improvement
program.
15
P/an ~ Hadbook
3. CONCLUSION
In conclusion, the importance of ensuring that all the City's actions are consistera
with the General Plan cannot be overstated. For the appropriate City decision
making body to approve a project or proposal, any areas of inconsistency between
thc General Plan and the proposal must be eliminated prior to project approval or
adoption.
ff the proposed project is not modified to be consistera with the General Plan, then
according to State Law, the project cannot be ~od. In addition, in the evem
of any legal challenge to a City approval or decision, the courts will consider the
consistency of the proposal with the City General Plan in making their decision.
16
C, enera/P/an Cons/stencv
APPENDICES
17
6enera/P/an Cons/aencv Handbook
LIST OF GENERAL PLAN GOALS BY ELEMI~NT
18
LAND USE )~I]~3~IENT
A complete and integrated mix of residential, commercial, indusUial, recreational,
cultural, public and open space land uses.
A City of diversified development character where rural and hi~oric areas are
protected and co-exist with newer mban development.
3. A land use pattern that will protect and enhance residential neighborhoods.
A development pailern that preserves and enhances the environmental resources of the
Study Area.
A land use pattern and intensity of dcvdopment that encourages alternate modes of
translxnUflen, including Wansit, bicycling, and walking.
A Plan for Old Town that enhances the economic viability, preserves historic
structures, addresses parking and public improvement needs, and emblishes design
standards to enhance and maintain the character and economic viab'ffity of Old Town.
Orderly annexation and development of unincorporated areas within Temecula's Sphere
of Influence.
8. A City which is compatible and coordinated with regional land use patterns.
CIRCULATION
Strive to maintain a Level of Service "D" or better at all intersections within the City
during peak hours and Level of Service "C" or better during non-peak houn.
2. Enhance traffic safety on City meets.
A regional transportation system that accommodates the safe and efficient movement
of people and 'good$ to and from the COmmUnity.
An efficient City cixculation system through the use of transportation system
management and demand management strategies.
An adeq~ supply of private and public paridng to meet the needs of w~idents and
visitors to the City.
6. Safe and efficient alternatives to motorized travel throughout the City.
7. A track circulation system that provides for the safe and efficient transponati0n of
commodities and also minimive,s nois~, air poliution, and traffic impacts to the City.
HOUSING ~l.VuV!l:n~
19
5.
OPEN SPACR/CONSRRVATION
A diversity of housing opportunities that satisfy the physical,
needs of existing and future residents of Tetnecula.
Affordable housing for all segments of Temecttla.
Removal of governmental constraints in the maintenance,
development of housing, where appropriate and legally possible.
Conservation of the existing affordable housing stock.
Equal housing oppommity for all residents in Tenam.
7.
8.
9.
social and economic
improvement and
A high quality parks and recreation system that meets the varying recreational needs
of residents.
Conservation and p~ of surface water, groundwater and imported water
resources.
Conservation of important biological habitats and protection of plant and animal species
of concern, wildlife corridors, and general biodiversity.
Conservation of energy. resources through the use of available technology and
conservation practices.
Conservation of open space areas for a balance of recreation, scenic enjoyment, and
protection of natural resources and features.
Preservation of significant historical and cultural resources.
Protection of prime agricultural land from premature conversion to urbanized uses.
A trail system that serves both recreational and transportation needs.
Protection of dark skies from intrusive fight sources which may impact the Palomar
Observatory.
GROW'H:I MANAGEMPNT/PURI-~C FAcII.rrlR~ RI.pqVfRNT
1. Cooperative management of growth among local governments within Riverside County.
Orderly and efficient pattoms of growth within Temeada that enhances the quality of
life for residents.
Effective and cost efficient sheriff, fire and emergency medical service within the City.
A quality school system that contains adequate facilities and funding to educate the
youth of Temecula.
Public and Quasi-public facilities and sen/ices which provide for the social, cultural,
civic, religious, and recreational needs of the community.
A water and waste water infrastructure system that supixn'ts existing and future
development in the Study Area.
7. An effective, safe and environmentally compatible flood control system.
A solid waste management system that provides for the safe and efficient collection,
wansponation, recovery and disposal of solid wastes.
Adequate electrical, natural gas, and telecommunication systems to meet the demand
of now and existing development.
PUBLIC SAFETY
Protection from natural hazards associated with geologic innability, seismic events, and
flooding.
Protection of the public and environmental resources from exposure to hazardous
materials and waste.
A safe and secure community free from the threat of personal injury and loss of
property.
4. An effective response of emergency* services following a disaster.
NOISE
Land use planning that provides for the separation of significant noise genentors from
sensitive receptor areas.
2. The control of noise between land uses.
3. Consider noise issues in the planning pKr. ess.
4. Minimi-e noise impacts from Wanspoliation noise sources
AIR OUALITY m-nMENT
1. Improvement of air quality through proper ]and use planning in Temecnia.
2. Hahanc~ mobility to minimiTe air poHuUmt emjnions.
21
3. Incorporate energy conservation practices and recycling to reduce emissions.
4. Effective coordination of air quality improvement efforts in the Western Riverside area.
COMMUNITY DI~-~IGN m-~ME~FF
1. Bnhancem~nt of the City's ~ rela~d to i~ re~ional and natural setting and its
tourist orientation.
new development and modifications to existing development.
3. Preservation and enhs~-.ment of the posffive qualities of jndividual districts or
neighborhoods.
4. A streetscape system that provides cohesivehess and enhances community image.
5. Protection of public views of si~mificant natural features.
6. Maintenance and enlmncement of the City's public spaces and resources.
7. Community J~athering areas which provide social, civic, cultural and recreational needs ._~
of the community.
~:~ONOMIC DK~ O~
1. Development of a strong base of clean manufacturing activities which employs a skjl|ed
labor force and can be successfully integrated into Temecula's community character.
2. Diversif'tcation of the economic base to include a range of manufacturing, retail, and
service activities.
3. Maintain an economic base to provide a sound fiscal foundation for the City as well
as quality community facilities and Mgh service levels.
4. l~tabJ~,~h a diverse education and training and job placement system wMch will develop
and maintain a Mgh quality work force in Temecula.
5. Promote the advantages to businesses of locating in Temecula, including cost
advantages, amenities, housing, community activities and civic services.
Develop Temecula as a comprehensive, recognizable tourist destination, with a range
of attractions throughout and beyond the sphere of influence.
Genera/P/an Cons/.ftencv Handbook
POLICfES IMPLE34gNTING THE VHJ~AGE CENTER CONCEPT
Policy 1.3
Policy 1.7
Policy 5.2
Policy 5.3
Policy 5.4
Policy 5.5
Policy 5.6
Policy 5.7
Policy 5.8
Policy 5.9
Policy 5.10
PoHcy 5.11
Policy 8.2
LAND USE Pt.P~rRNT
Require the development of unified or clustered community-level and
neighborhood-level commercial centers and discourage development of strip
commercial uses.
Require the preparation of specific plans as designated on the Specific Plan
0verhy to achieve the com~ve planning and phasing of development and
Require the provision of pedestrian and bicycle iinim~s from residential areas to
open space/recreation faci~ties, commefcinl and employment centers.
Encourage variety in the design of sidewalh and trails with respect to alignment
and surface materials to provide a convenient and enjoyable experience for the
users.
Provide grade separated bike paths along major arterials where feasible. Ensure
that non-grade separated bike paths are designed for safety.
Designate V'~!age Centers on the land Use Plan to provide areas within the
COmmURity that are litban in character, OOHlRill a !nixttlfe of compatible uses, and
are designed to reduce or eliminnte the need for the automobile in trave!ling to
or within the VHI~e Centers.
Encourage higher density re~devas$, mixed use development, and supporting
public and community facilities within Village Centers.
Establish design guidelines, development standards, and incentive programs for
uses within VH!~e Centers.
Develop a plan to link VHlage Centers by trniln and potential wansit systems
including bus, shutfie and light rail.
Ensure that the architecture, landscape desig~ and site plnnning within V'ffi~e
Centers emphasizes a pedestrian scale and safe and convenient access between
Ensure that adequate public gathering areas or plazas are incorporated within
VHlage Centers to allow for social interactien and community activities.
Discourage the development of strip commercial centers that increase auto-
dependency.
Provide a system of open space that is coordinated with regional open space uses
to comprehensively address the management and conservation resources.
Policy 8.4
Policy 3.6
Poticy 4.4
Policy 4.5
Policy 4.6
Policy 4.7
Policy 4.8
Policy 6.5
Continue to participate with the Western Riverside Council of Governments in the
preparation of plans and programs addressing regional issues, including the
Growth Management Strategy, Comprehensive Transportation Plan, Water
Resources SWategy, and School Facilities Plan.
CIRCULATION ~t.nMENT
Coordinate with Western Riverside Council of Governments to identify, protect,
and pursue opportunities for a light rail transit along major Wansportation
corridon which connect Temecula to offier. popul_afion centers.
Require new developmen~ to ineoxporate design features which facilitate wansit
service and encourage Wansit ridership such as bus pullout ~, covered bus
stop facilities, efficient trail systems through projects to transit stops, and
incoxpox~on of paiemian walkways that pass through subdivision boundary
walls.
Require specific plans and mher mixed use projects to provide an internal system
of trails linking s~hools, shopping centers, transit, and other public facilities
within residential axeas.
Provide a comprdensive system of Class I and/or Class H bicycle lanes to meet
the needs of cyclist traveling to and from work and other destinations within the
City.
Encourage a ,nix of uses wiffiin a project designed to'maximize internal trip
making, maximize the use of paricing facilities, and to promote a shift from auto
use to pedestrian and bicycle modes of travel.
Encourage the pwvision of additional regional public transportation services and
support facilities, including park-and-ride lots near the 1-15 freeway and within
Adequate linkages shah be provided for non-motorized mode, between residential
areas and commercial/employmem activity centen, public institutions, and
recreation axeas.
Policy 1.3
Policy 1.6
HOUSING
Require a mixture of diverse housing types and densities in new developments
around ~e village centers to enhance ~eir people-orientation and diversity.
Promote the development of compatible mixed use projects tha_t_ promotes and
enhances the village concept, facilitates the efficient use of public facilities, and
supports alternative nansit options.
Policy 1.10
Policy 3.1
Policy 8.1
Policy 8.3
Policy 8.4
Policy 2.4
Policy 2.5
Policy 2.7
Policy 1.2
Policy 2.1
Policy 2.3
Genera/P/an Cmu/.ftenev Handbook
OlYs~ SPACWCONSERVATION
MaximiTe pedestrian and bicycle access to existing and new park facilities when
appropriate.
R~quire development proposals to idmify significant biological resources and
provide mitigation including the use of adequate buffering; selective preservation;
the provision of replacement habitats; the use of sensitive site planning techniques
including wildlife corridor/recreafiol~l trails; and other appropriate measures.
Provide a city-wide recreation real system that connects to the County's regional
trail system through adoption of a Master Plan of Tr~iln that provides for
bicycling, equestrian, hiking and jogging trails and support facilities.
Require proposed development to provide Wail connections to the city-wide Wail
system as defined by the Parks and Recreation M~ster Plan and Master Plan of
Require development plans to identify locations for an intemal Wails/sidewalk
system that iinkn land uses and provides convenient travel to transit facilities.
GROWTH MANAG~/mNT/PUBI IC FA(~ JTIES gr-!~!ENT
Encourage development of VH!a~e Centers, as defined in the Land Use and
Community Design Elements to reduce public sentice costs and environmental
impacts through compatible land use relationships, and efficient circulation and
open space systems.
Encourage new development that helps to create and maintain a balance between
jobs and housing opportunities.
Discourage the use of assessment districts that promote urban sprawl and
premature urb~niTafion in rural agricultural areas.
AIR OUALITY nLPMnNT
Encourage in-fill development near activity centers and along transportation
corridors.
Implement transportation demand mamgement techniques to reduce motor vehicle
trips, including walking, bicycling, rideshating, local transit, staggered work
schedules and telecommunications.
Pursue development of a public transit system including local shuttle and bus
routes, and bicycle and pedestrian trails that are linked to regional light rail.
Policy 2.4
Policy 1.1
Policy 2.2
Policy 3.2
Policy 3.4
Policy 4.1
Policy 6.1
Policy 7.1
Policy 7.4
Genera/P/an Condsencv Handbook
Promote alternatives to motorized translxyrtation by establishing a convenient and
efficient system of bicycle mutes and pedestrian walkways.
COIV~'UNITY DESIGN
Promote the development of a comprehensive system of trsiis and open space
areas that connect schools, public recreation areas, residential areas and
commercial centers.
Promote a cohesive and integrated pattern of development for large undeveloped
areas, by reqniring the preparation of Specific Plans.
Preserve the scale and character of residential development by creating
appropriate transitions between lower density, rural areas, and higher density
development.
Improve the pedestrian orientation, convenience and safety of commercial centers
through the pwvision of pedesUian amenities such as benches, plaT~ areas,
information kiosks and other street furniture, and through carerid site planning
Promote the development of a continuous sidewalk and trail system throughout
the City.
Provide for street furniture in areas with high pedestrian activity and pwvide for
shade trees in shopping areas.
Encourage the development of public spaces and pln~s within commercial
develoinnents that can accommodate cultural and social events and function as
community gathering areas.
Encourage development of common areas and facilities within residential
developments to provide gathering areas for social and recreational activities.
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
RESOLUTION NO. 94-
R:XHOOAIqDXOICI.I.eC1 ~I4/N. nil 4
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
RESOLUTION NO. 94-
A RESOL~ON OF ~ CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY
OF ~ APPROVING ~ GENERAL PLAN
CONSISTENCY HANDBOOK.
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted the first General Plan for the City of Temecula
on November 9, 1993; and
WHEREAS, the Plan does not contain adequate guidelines addressing the day-to-day use
and implementation of the General Plan; and
Wln~R~S, the City of Temecula desires to provide standard guidelines concerning the
use and implementation of the General Plan; and
WHERFAS, the General Plan Consistency Handbook will provide the needed guidance
and direction to consisten~y implment the City's General Plan; and
WIiRnR~kS, the City Planning Commission considered the Otmeml Plan Consistency
Handbook at its F~mary 7, 1~4 meeting; and
WITEIIRJ, S, the Planning Commission recommended that the Council approve the
General Plan Consistency and adopted PC Resolution, 94-?.9?.; and
W!~JIRJkS, notice of the proposed Handbook was posted at City Hall, County Library,
Temccula Branch, the U.S. Post Office and the Tm~xa~a VallL7 Chamber of Commerce; and
WHEREAS, the General Plan Consistency Handbook was considered at the February
22, 1994.
NOW, T!:!RIIRPORE, ~ CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY OF TEMECULA
DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOIJOWS:
Section 1. Environmental Complionce. The proposed project is exempt from
the provisions of the C~lifornia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section
15061C0)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines.
Section 2. Approval of the Handbook. The General Plan Consistency
Handbook is approved for use in the implementation of the City General Plan.
Section 3.
1994.
PASSE1), APPROV!~ AND ADOPTED this 22rid day of Febnmry,
RON ROBERTS
MAYOR
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SnAIl
STATE OF CALIFO~)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITYOFTEMECULA )
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, }IRREBY DO CERTIFY that the
fo~-going Resolution No.94- was duly introduced and placed upon its first _t~dlng at a
regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 22nd day of February, 1994,
by the following roll call vote:
COUNCn-MmMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COlINCH, MEMBERS:
3UNES. G~
CITY Ct-PP, K
R:~HOGAND~tIPCH.CC12/14/94 sdl 6
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION
R:~HOGAND~GPCH.CCI 2/14/94
ATTA~ NO. 2
PC RESOLUTION NO. 94-02
A RESO~ON OF Tnr~ PLANNING COMMISSION FOR
THF, CITY OF T~MECULA RECO~ING THAT ~
COUNCIL APPROVE OF Tnr~ GENERAL PLAN
CONSISTENCY HANDBOOK.
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted the first General Plan for the City of Temecula
on November 9, 1993; and
WHEUE~,S, the Plan does not contain adequate guidelines addressing the day-to-day use
and implementation of the General Plan; and
WHKUE~S, the City of Temecula desiw, s to provide standard guidelines concerning the
use and implementation of the General Plan; and
WHERFAS, the General Plan Consistency Handbook will provide the needed guidance
and direction to consistently implement the City's G~--neral Plan; and
WHEREAS, notice of the proposed Handbook was posted at City Hall, County Library,
Rancho California Branch, the U.S. Post Office and the Temecuh Valley Chamber of
Commerce; and
VHI!~,EAS, the General Plan Consistency Handbook was considered at the Febnmry
7, 1994, meeting of the Commition at which time interested persons had an opportunity to
testify either in support or opposition.
NOW, T!~ERI~.FORE, ~ HANNING COMMISSION OF ~ CITY OF
TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RECOhlMEND THAT Tnv. COUNCIL FOR ~ CITY
OF TJE2~IF. LtlA APPROVE Tnv. GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY HANDBOOK TO
GUIDE ~ IIVIF,,I~erATION OF TBY, CITY GENERAL PLAN.
Section 1. PASSED APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 7th day of February, 1994.
STHVEN J. FORD
CHAIRMAN
I HEI~ERY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resohation was duly adopted by the Planning
Commi.~sion of the City of Temeeula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 7th day of
February, 1994 by the following vote of the Commission:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
NOES:
PLANNING COMMISSIOn:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
G~Y~ORNIr~L
S~RET~Y
ATTACHMENT NO. 4
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
R:~IOOAND~OI~"H.CCI ~'148~. aal 8
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Planning Commission
Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning
February 7, 1994
General Plan Consistency Handbook
Prepared By: David W. Hogan
RECOMMENDATION:
ADOPT PC Resolution No. 94-
resolution entitled:
recommending approval of a
"A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR THE
CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE COUNCIL
APPROVE OFTHE GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY HANDBOOK"
BACKGROUND:
In the process of beginning to implement the City's new General Plan, a number of questions
have been raised concerning the issue of consistency with the newly adopted General Plan.
As a result, Staff has prepared the attached Handbook to provide a standard methodology to
guide implementation of the Plan.
DISCUSSION:
The purpose of the General Plan Consistency Handbook is to provide a standard methodology
for determining whether or not a proposed development project, ordinance or program is
consistent with the City General Plan. The Handbook has been designed so that as the
programs are implemented, they can be incorporated into this process without major
modification.
The General Plan Consistency Handbook has been prepared using the following documents:
1. The 1993 State Planning, Zoning, and Development Laws;
2. The State of California General Plan Guidelines; and,
3. The Pre-final version of the adopted City General Plan.
To facilitate the use of the Handbook, all the Goals in the General Plan, as well as the policies
relating to the Village Center Concept have been included as Attachments. A copy of the
Handbook is included in Attachment No. I to this Staff Report.
A draft of the Handbook has been reviewed by the City Attorney. The Attorneys comments
included several suggested revisions to Sections 1.3 and 2.3. These comments have been
incorporated into the attached Draft of the Handbook.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
The proposed Handbook will provide a standard methodology for implementing the adopted
General Plan for the City of Temecula. As a result, approval and use of this Handbook does
not have the potential to cause a significant adverse impact on the environment. Therefore,
the Director of Planning has determined that the project is exempt from California
Environmental Quality Act, pursuant to Section 15061 (b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines. ·
FUTURE GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY:
The General Plan Consistency Handbook will ensure consistent implementation of the City's
General Plan end, as a result, approval of this Handbook is consistent with the adopted
General Plan.
Attachments:
1. General Plan Consistency Handbook - Blue Page 3
2, PC Resolution No, 94- - Blue Page 4
R:~TAFFRP~GPC*H. PCI 2/14/~ i~ 2
ITEM NO.
2O
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY ~_
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Herwood T. Edvalson, Assistant City Manager~
February 22, 1994
PERFORMING ARTS/COMMUNITY THEATER
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council consider the City's participation with the Temecula Valley Unified School
District in the construction and expansion of the Chapperal High School Theater for use as a
community performing arts theater.
BACKGROUND:
Several months ago representatives of the community, including City Council and staff
representatives, school district officials, members of the Arts Council, Kemper Officials, etc.,
made the trip to Poway to observe the success with which the Poway school district and City
collaborated to make a performing arts facility available to the community. These same
representatives also reviewed a proposal to convert the existing cinema theaters in the Tower
Plaza to a smaller performing arts theater.
Council consideration is required at this time in order to provide direction to the school district
in their design end construction of the high school auditorium. In order to maintain the
district's time lines for design of the high school, a decision concerning City participation has
been requested by February 25, 1994.
Attached to this staff report are three alternatives that have been prepared for discussion.
Option One is the high school's original theater configuration. Option Two is the configuration
that most closely resembles the type of performing arts facility that Poway has created.
Option Three is an intermediate proposal designed what could be accomplished at the high
school with · $1,000,000contribution from the City. For your information, attached to this
staff report is a letter from the Arts Council and a sketch of the Tower Plaza Theater.
FISCAL ANALYSIS:
An almost infinite variety of possibilities exist for City participation in a community performing
arts center.' Much of the City's funds have been committed to its Capital Improvement
Program (CIP). One possible source of funding would be from Developer Impact Fees currently
collected for municipal facilities. This project currently falls outside of the CIP. Alterations
in timing and facilities in future parks might be used to cover a contribution to a theater
project.
The per unit costs for a project at the high school might be estimated at $100 per square foot
for ancillary space, e.g., green room, actor's dressing rooms, etc.; $120 per additional seat;
and $200,000 in architects fees for redesign of the project.
TEMECULA VALLEY
Unified School District
SUPERINTENDENT
Pa~cia B. Novotney, Ed.D.
January 25, 1994
I Woody Edvalson, Assistant City Manager
CITY OF TEMECULA
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
Fax: (909) 694-6488
BOARD OF EDUCATION
Rosie Vanderhaak
Joan F. Sparkman
Dr. David Eurich
Walt Swictda
Bamara T0okef
SUBJECT: Chapanal High Performing Arts Fadlity
Dear Mr. Edvalson:
At your request, we have developed a conceptual 400-seat Chaparrai High Performing Arts Facility for the City's
consideration, as an alternative to the conceptual 800-seat Poway style theater previously developed. This new
alternative would look more like a larger high school facility then a large community facility like Poway's.
The 400-seat alternative proposed in the attachment could be designed and constructed for completion with the
high school by 1997, with the following joint District/City participation:
Construction Project Cost.'
District funding $1.85 million
(cost of the base 300-seat high school facility)
City funding $1.0 million
Joint-Use Agreement:
This facility would be primarily serving the educational needs of the
high school program, before and after school. Because of the additional 100-seat capacity, this
facility would additionally be useful for community performances, during time periods not used
by the high school.
Ongoing maintenance and operation costs and staffing would be shared by the District and the
City in a manner to be determined, agreeable to both. parties.
Please note that the 400-seat alternative developed is one of many combinations of the ancillary facilities and
features which could be incorporated in a $2.85 million dollar facility, constrained primarily by total building square
footage.
As mentioned to you, although we have previously developed January 1994 as the deadline for confirming a joint-
use facility, we could probably work to achieve the schedule, if City funding and the joint-use agreement can be
confirmed by February 25.
Please call if you have questions. Hard copy to follow via U.S.Mail with better copy of proposal.
Sincerely,
....
Director of Facilities Development
Attachment
cc:
Patricia B. Novotney, Ed.D., Superintendent
John Brooks, Assistant Superintendent Business Services
Lettie Boggs, Coordinator of Facilities Planning
Fred Guslda, Trittipo and Associates
31350 Rancho Vista Road / Ternecula, CA 92592 / (909) 676-2661
(DAVE:CiTY4OOS.EAT)
TUUSD P.01
FRCILITZES ID:909-695-7~:~5 3RN 25'94 .14:28 No,O05
,, '~ , ~.,--r. ~
,- : s II .# · ,
· : .I "t !
~CHOO~D~'lli~T
Temeadm. ~ 92692
~UBJECT= Tm Vd.y P& Iofn '~1Anw C~ntef ~ Chapmad High Bohod
lOOKkiltkmdaeabmkta~sSOOanttlmaterls
40O meet thetie - s~l~.oxlmJ~tly 1,200 stir_h;-' s,f,
6,900 :;.L ef mdFli.anr' eqm Metage ~o I~ mid ss
Weiectotd:4m¶7,6OOL(./e2.BmlbeonmmatkmaofL
.NmlIs4:)&A,~SOClAI~
2386 ~ Ave. l ,SdCe1~ l ~ CA r20~ r,c~(b'ig)931-85~.~(619)~13.1-G5'/7
· · · · ·
:. I IJJJ "
Z
,-- °z ,,'r' .,,
,,=, uP
,- E~ o, '
=~o= -~<
ug ...o
z ~ i- (DO Zu)
z0 = o,..uP
Z ~ ,9 ~' "' --J,~ ,',5ox°~<
0."<"'
0 ~ ~ Z tr I- n"g"rm, a.I-
i- _~ Ci ~ Z Z
0 O0 0 Z o®' d ®o®o®oo
oNrCD z
· · · · ·
._1
_J
<~
rr
T
rrI/
II I
A preliminary study by the Am Council of Temecula Valley, led by Facilities
Chairman Dr. Jeff Honon, has concluded that now is the time to seriously consider the
establishment of a permanent Performing Am Facility for the Temecula Valley. The
number of local music, cultural and artistic groups and associations has risen in
number, activity and ongoing support to the point where establishment of permanent
facilities can be feasible.
It has become evident, also, that lack of such a facility will inhibit growth of
cultural activities and prevent current orgsnlr~tions from being as active as they would
like to be in our area. They currently must search out facilities in Lake Elsinore and
North San Diego County in which to perform because there is nothing suitable locally
in which to perform . The best facility in the Valley at present is at Murrieta High
School at 451 seats. Along with a smaller facility at Elsinore High School, they have
the only Orchestra Pits in the area and possess very reasonable acoustics.
As cultural efforts grow and sophisticate, we are finding a large population of
people experienced in music, dance and theater who were quietly living in the valley
waiting for somethi~:tg to happen. They are now coming forth and stimulating additional
refinement and vision to the cultm'al community. A local dance studio has suggested,
for example, that with a proper facility they would like to organize a Ballet company.
There are also people experienced in Big Band and Civic Light Opera who would
become active with a place to pCt fOHth
Needs would best be described as short term and long term. We have had'
meetings with representatives of most of the valley' s cultural groups. Each meeting was
Temecula Performing Arts Facility
punctuated with a unanimous wish and excitement for a fully functional local venue. By
fully functional we mean capable of handling virtually all local needs for at least a few
years to come. Capable of seating at least 400 people, full dressing area, green room,
40 to 45 foot Fly Loft for sets, backdrops and curtains, adequate wing area four set
handling and storage, a proper entrance area for refreshments and ticket sales, adequate
rest rooms for the public and performers. All design, execution, equipment and seating
must be of the highest quality to insure high regard and enthusiasm from both
pe~ormers and the theater going public.
Short term solutions began with a timely offer from the Kemper orgnnln~tion to
consider converting the existing SoCal Cinema to a Performing Arts Facility. A
feasibility study underwritten by the Arts Council and done by the Bluerock Pamership
indicates that to create a fully functional facility, we could remove the center wall from
between the two theater slots, build a stage, orchestra pit, and fly loft by extending the
present building toward the freeway, and build wings on both sides of the building. All
other facilities are there in one form or another at present. Estimated construction cost
(with ample room for contingencies) is in the range of $1.9 Million dollars. There are
some significant mutual benefits to this consideration. One is that by generating
considerable foot traffic within the Tower Plaza we could materially assist Kernper in
its revitalization of the plaza. The. landscaping is aRnc~ve, and there is certainly the
expectation that businesses would establish there which would cater to the theater goer
with products and services designed to make an evening at the theater more enjoyable.
Dinner/theater packages, specialty dessert and coffee houses and the like are certainly
to be expected. Most onsite and offsite improvements are already in place, as well as
excellent freeway visability for a Marquee at the rear.
2
Temecula Performing Am Facility
A separate free standing Facility from scratch must be considered to place the
Tower p):~vn alternative into proper perspective. The architects have suggested that the
$1.9 nM!lion dollar budget would build a slightly smaller structure on undeveloped land
as long as there was no land cost, utilities were currently to the site, and the City/utility
fee structure could be kept to a minimal mount. An ongoing analysis perhaps should
always keep this option in mind in case future Philanthropic events make this a more
attractive alternative. For the moment, however the Plan seems to be the best option.
Long term planning would dictate the presence of a larger, more flexible venue.
The presence of a 400 seat facility for at least five years wouM allow a level of activity
and audience development to evolve which would then nammHy require a larger, fully
capable venue. We feel that the community would be best served by a facility very
similar to the Poway Center for the Performing Arts adjacent to Poway High School.
In that case a partnership between the School District and the City of Poway allowed
construction of a beautiful and fully capable 815 seat structure. Design, construction,
and execution was superb, quality is very high. A facility that community can be
extremely proud of for years. to come. The facility serves Poway and adjacent
communities with a great variety of education and theater, also serving the High School
by providing facilities for a high quality music, dance and theater program for its
students.
An unfortunate reality is that the vast majority of High School students today
have never attended a live cultural event. With this arrangement that pwblem can be
easily remedied, opening up new vistas of personal growth for our school. children.
Outside organizations can be imported to provide Civic Light Opera, Ballet, Opera,
and Orchestral music as well as a whole variety of popular'and educational programs
our local associations may not be able to provide.
Temecula Performing Arts Facility
The opportunities accorded by the timing of construction of newly approved
Chapparal High School will allow for exactly this kind of event to occur in Temecula.
A meeting of representatives from the Temecuh Unified School District, Temecula
City Council, Arts Council, various cultural associations, and the Temecula City
Manager came to a unanimous opinion declaring this a high priority due to the window
of opportunity being presented on both the Tower Plaza facility and Chappanl High,
the opportunity to accomplish a major facility via a City/School District partnership at
Chapparal using the resources of both entities to accomplish something neither would
be able to accomplish alone makes a great deal of sense. The budget would approach
$6 to 8 million dollars with $1.85 rniillon coming from the School District and the
balance probably coming from a combination of City resources, Corporate donation,
private donation, and certain outside sources such as the Endowment for the
Performing Arts. The rehtive balance would have to be determined. The meeting
consensus was that an overall plan including both short term and long term facilities
should be pursued.
Even though such a major project may seem a little large for our own
community, we envision Temecula becoming a destination point for theater for people
from miles around who do not have such opportunities. Fwm Fallbrook to Hemet to
Lake Elsinore encompasses a substantial population to draw from. It would be a
development such as we now enjoy within the Restaurant business, where there are far
more restaurant seats than our population alone can support. The fact is that we have
become a destination point for people from surrounding areas whose communities do
not have such choices.
4
Temecula Performing Arts Facility
The potential is there, the opportunity is there, the will is there, and we are
quite sure the means is there. The 400 seat facility could be reality within a year with
the 800 seat facility built in five years.
I
T~meeni~ Performlf~ Arf~ Thp~ter
/nmst/gat/~ M~t/~g
Oaober 6, 1993
Salient' Facts:
Facilities after conversion: -- -.
- -.. ~...: "
Mens and womas ~ssing mats-'."
~n Room ""
-. ., -~'
Fly Loft: 40 to 45 foot. "' " ""
Compulmized H~ti,tS system..= -=. -~~
Quality sound sysma ~--- - -4.
S:-stimnted monthly sI2ndanc~: 5000 propie
In-House ticlet office
Dess~ and btvm'idge sales area
Highly visible freeway marquee
Rent: CAM (about 30 cemper. foot per month) plm ~ly some rent
(negotiable) offered by Kernper!based on 7000 Square Feet
(pt~Hmlnary).
Construction Budget:
Fees, Permits and Inspection:
Contingencies:
$1,516,000
$303,000
$273,000
$2,092,000
(prelimir,,try leasability plan and budget by the Blurock Parmership, designers
of the Poway Center for the Performing Arts)
DEPARTMENTAL
'REPORTS
'CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
APPROVAL:
CITY A'I'I'ORNEY
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Council/City Manager
Anthony Elmo, Chief Building Official ~
February 22, 1994
Building and Safety January 1994, Activity Report
RECOMMENDATION:
Receive and file.
DISCUSSION:
The following is a summary of activity for January 1994:
Building Permits Issued ............................................ 172
Building Valuation ........... ~ ............................. ~9,347,709
Revenue Collected ......................................... $85,141.34
Housing Starts ....... .. ........................................... 89
Building Inspections ............................................. 1725
Agenda Report
FebmaW 22, 1994
Page 2
Code Enforcement Actions ......................................... 205
Active Cases Pending .............................................. 156
Closed Cases .................................................... 34
V:I,TONYIII!~rrmJAN'I4.Ret
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER [~/~,
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning
February 22, 1994
Monthly Report
RECOMMENDATION: Receive and File
Discussion:
The following is a summary of the Planning Department's
caseload and project activity for the month of January 1994:
Caseload Activity:
The department received applications for 7 administrative cases and 3 for public
hearing cases for the month of January as follows:
EIR (Sponsor Prepares)
Lot Line Adjustment
Parcel Map
Ongoing Projects:
Old Town Soecific Plan: The Plan, was approved by the City Council February
8, 1994.
Development Code: The consultant is working on a Public Hearing Draft. A
final AdviSory Committee meeting will be scheduled ands joint Planning
Commission/City Council workshop has been scheduled for February 28, 1994.
French Valley Airoort: The City provided comments on the ALUC's preferred
alternative for French Valley Airport on February 4, 1994.
Water Efficient LandscaM Ordinance The Draft Ordinance was recommended
for approval by the Planning Commission on February 7, 1994. This item will
be scheduled for a March City Council meeting.
R:~IONTHLY.IqFT~1994UAN 2114/94 vgw 1
Temec: ,la Renional nenter RoecifiC Plan end FnvironmentAI Impact Report: This
Specific Plan was presented at a Planning Commission Workshop on May 4,
1992 where the Commissioners gave direction to the applicant and staff. The
Specific Plan is scheduled for a PC workshop on March 21, 1994.
Environmental Impact Report '340 prepared for the Temecula Regional Canter
was approved by the Planning Commission on June 21, 1993 and certified by
the City Council on July 13, 1993.
Winchester Hills and Camoos Verdes Roeci~c Bans and Fnvironmental Imoact
Reoorts: These Specific Bans were discussed at a Banning Commission
Workshop on May 4, 1992 where the Commissioners gave direction to the
applicant and staff. The Notice of Completion for the Cam poe Verdes EIR went
to State Clearinghouse July 10, 1992. Both of these Specific Plans went to
the DRC meetings on January 5, 1993. Campoe Verdes Specific Plan is
scheduled for a March 21, 1994 Banning Commission workshop.
Murdv Ranch Soecific Ban and Fnvironmental linDact Report: This Specific
Plan was presented to the Planning Commission at a Workshop on April 6,
1992. The Commission provided Staff and the applicant direction relative to
design issues. The applicant has incorporated these changes into the Specific
Plan. This Specific Ban will be sc!'eduled for a Planning Commission meeting
upon completion of the Development Agreement and the Congestion
Management Plan. An addendum to the EIR is currently being reviewed by
staff.
Johnson Ranch Specific Plan: The Specific Plan has been to a Development
Review Committee meeting and is currently being amended to incorporate
staff's comments. The EIR has been submitted and is being reviewed by staff.
Attachments:
1. Count & Valuation Summary by Type - page 3
2. Revenue and Status Report - page 4
R:VklONTHLY.RFT%1884%JAN 2/14/94 vgw 2
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
COUNT AND VALUATION SUMMARY BY TYPE
JANUARY 1993
R:~IONTl-lLY.RPT~1~g4.UAN 2/14/84 yew 3
REPT155 COUNT &VALUATION ILIaANY BY TYPE PAG~ 1
02/0?/96 16:56 SubtotaL: Crmtr Type
Dmt~' ge 1 01/01/g& Thru 01/31/9~ JANUAIIY 199& Date TYlx: 1
Ty~ ,SeLect ):PLAN
A/P/D Type Construction type Co~t Sq Feet VaLuation Fees Paid
A PLANNING CASE-6/9/93
CERT OF CQI4PLAiAIVE FPN
EIR (SPOIlSOIl PREPARES)
LOT LINE ADJUSTNEWT
NINOIt/14AJOI EVENT/PROFIT
PtCL NAP-Cell IAD I~/INP
PLOT PLAN ADI41NISTIUkTIVE
1 O .00 .IX)
1 O .00
I O .00 8,278.00
I O .00 960.00
I O .00 190.00
1 0 .00 1,8&9.00
10 O .00 12,701.00
TOTAL ee
10 O .O0 12,701.00
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
REVENUE STATUS REPORT
R:~VKNTHLY.FFT%1884U,N~I 2114/94 vgw 4
REVPRISg
02,,0~,'~
O01
161
ACCGNT #
6101
6102
4103
6106
4105
4106
6107
6108
6109
6110
6111
6112
6113
6114
4115
6116
4117
4118
6119
6120
6121
4122~
4123
41~4
6125
4126
4127
4128
41~9
6130
6131
6132
413~
6135
4136
4137
6138
6139
41/0
4141
4142
414J,.
4145
6166
GENERAL FUND
PLANNING
DESCRIPTION
RNENDED FINAL IMP
APPEALS
aRT. OF LAND DIV. (3)I4PLIANCE
EXTENSION OF TIlE
SINGLE FANILY TRACTS
NULTI-FANILY TRACTS
PARCEL IMPS
LOT LINE ADJUST!4Brr
KINat C~MI~:
PARCEL IIERGER (2-4 LOTS)
REC0RDABLE SIRDIVISION NAPS
REVERSION TO ACREAGE (5+LOTS)
SPECIAL SERVIC~ LETTER
GEC:OID UNIT'PERMITS
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
CONSISTENCY CHECKS
GENERAL PUUi MENDNEJlT
PLOT PLAN
PUBLIC USE PERMIT
REVISED PERNIT
SKCIFIC PLAN
SUBSTANTIAL CONFORIMNCE
TB4ORARY OUTIX)OR EVENT
TENPGIIARY USE PERNiT
VARIANCE
ZONING INFORMATION LETTER
CEQA (INITIAL S11X)IES)
GEQA ENVIROHENT IMPACT REPORT
DEVELOIN4ENT AGREEHENT
GEOLOGY 0RD. 54,7 APZ
LAFCO
PARCEL MP/I, IAIVER
HERB
ANENDED FINAL TRACY/PNt, IMP
CERTIFICATE Of CORRECTION
CCIDO TRACT IMP
REVERSION TO ACREAGE
LOT REVISION AFTER CHEat
LOT LINE ADJUST. PLAN CHEGC
CERT. OF a214PLIANCE PLAN CHEC~
(33ND. CERT. 0f CCNPL. PLII.
GERT. OF PNt. HERB PLAN C3C
CITY OF TENECIJI.A
REVENUE STATUS REPQtT
JAIMRY 1996
ADJUSTED
ESTINATE
.00
.00
.0O
.0O
.OO
.00
.O0
JANUARY
.O0
.00
.00
.IX)
.IX)
.(X)
.(30
.00
.00
.IX)
.00
.00
571.00
18.00
10,4~2.00
.00
.IX)
.IX)
.00
.IX)
.O0
.IX)
.00
.IX)
.O0
.IX)
.IX)
PAGE
975.00-
1,072.13
2,5TT.OO-
'18,&66.00-
.00
2,700.00-
2,500.00-
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
260.00-
1,969.75-
9,985.00-
.00
.00
148,Z59.25
3,707.00-
273.00-
500.00-
.00
3,80&.00-
.00
571.00-
18.00-
3,5~7.71-
10,4~2.00-
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.IX)
.00
.00
.00
.IX)
.00
.00
1.2
Lc',~tlN2
001
161
ACCI3UlIT#
r,1&9
&151
&152
&153
415~
&155
&156
&169
4261
09:2&:56
Gf~IIERAL FUI)
PLANNIlE
DESCalPTIOM
VACATIONS PLAN (3(
IX)CIMENT PltOCESSING
CONDB4NATXC)N PLAN CHECJ(
REF. RSICNI TO ACRE. PLAN CHEa(
PARCEL NAP PUiN CHECK
TRACT IMP PLAN CHECK
4,TH & ILLS. lIMITTALl
LCIM REVZEU
DRAIILME fTLI)Y REVIEV
IMPlOW !Ii~ECTION ON-SITE
K-RAT STLI)Y FEEl
FAST 11L&Q( PLANNING
F01NA FAST TRA(X
IN NOUIEFt. M CHECKI
ANNEXATION FEES
TEHP01tAItY USE PE!I4IT
LARGE FilLY DAY CARE
PYaPI~EJI IMft'E FACILITY
LAND DZV UNIT NAP
LAI)SCAPE PLAN NIX:
PLANNING
CITY Of TEHECULA
REVENUE &'TAM REPORT
JAIMRY 199&
.4DJUITED
EITIIMTE
1SO,OOO.O0
mY
8,315.11
.IX)
.OO
.O0
561.00
6,935,00
PAG~ 2
BALANf~ .X COL
,00
76,167.92 &9,2
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICEP~
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
A(iENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Tim D. Sealer, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
February 22, 1994
Public Works Monthly Activity Report
RECOMMENDATION:
Attached for City Council's review and filing is the Department of Public Works' Monthly
Activity Reports for January, 1994.
~egdmt~O222~meeetrpt
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Monthly Activity Report
JANUARY, 1994
Submitted by: Tim D. Serlet
(~Prepared by: Don Spagnolo
Date: February 10, 1994
WORK UNDER CONSTRUCTION:
CRC:
The Contractor has installed all exterior building doors and glass window walls in the
gallery. All interior doors & extedor Iouvers will be installed shortly. Installation of
the interior cabinetwork, suspended ceilings, and fire and security systems are on
going. The wood floor in the gym is being installed along with the carpet and vinyl
floor in the multi-purpose room.
Riverton Park:
The 120 day maintenance period began on December 30, 1993. Maintenance of the
park is ongoing during this period. The contractor is responsible for fertilizing and
weeding the planted areas of the park as specified in the contract bid documents.
Some areas of the site receive very little sunlight during the winter season. Low
temperatures and lack of sunlight have reduced the amount of hydroseed that has
germinated. The contractor is scheduled to rehydroseed the slow growth areas during
the middle of the month. It is anticipated that the park site improvements will be
accepted by the end of April.
Pala Communitv PArk:
Due to the subsurface water conditions encountered, studies are being performed to
analyze the effects of reducing the scope of the project.
PUjol Street Improvements:
A contract was awarded to IPS Services at the November 23, 1993 City Council
meeting. The pre-construction meeting was held on January 5, 1994. The contractor
should start work by the end of February.
pwO4~momottpt~ipUenuey 02/11/94
Monthly Activity Report
January, 1994
Page 2
Margarita Road Sidewalk Improvements:
A contract was awarded to Joslen Construction at the January 25, 1994 City Council
meeting. A pre-construction meeting will be held at the end of February.
PROJECTS BEING BID:
SpOrtS Park Slope Repair:
Public bids are being solicited for the Sports Park Slope Repair improvements, Project
No. PW93-06. The bid opening is scheduled to take place on February 24, 1994.
Solana Way Street Imorovements:
The bids were opened on January 20, 1994 and once the CFD 88-12 reimbursement
agreements are finalized by the adjacent owners, staff will recommend to City Council
to award the project to Yeager Construction, the apparent lowest bidder.
WORK IN DESIGN
Winchester Road Interim Ramo Improvements:
The consultant has submitted plans to obtain an encroachment permit from Caltrans
on February 8, 1994.
Winchester Road Loop:
The consultant has submitted the revised Project Report to Caltrans and the plans
were submitted to Caitrans on December 27th for their review.
Ynez Road Landscape Improvements:
Final plans were submitted at the end of January for review. Construction is schedule
to start in early spring.
Kent Hintergardt Memorial Park:
The first plan check comments for the plans and specifications for the concession
stand and rest room facilities at Kent Hintergardt Memorial Park, Project No. PW94-
01 CSD, have been returned to the architect. The revised plans and specifications
should be returned to the City for the second plan check before the end of the month.
;,wO4~THam:mt~ipUenuey 02/11/94
Monthly A~ Report
Janwry, 1994
Page 3
I om~ I inda Park - Ih
The revised improvement plans and specifications for Phase II improvements of Lome
Linda Park, Project No. PW94-O2CSD, have been ratumed to the City for second plan
check. The second plan check comments will be returned to the architect before the
end of the month.
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
l iefer Road. John Werner Road. Rantiq90 Road and Walcott Corridor:
Staff has completed the process of reviewing the proposals for the above road
projects and the firms with the highest ranking have been selected. Staff is now in
the process of notifying all participants of the results.
pwO4Vnoeotmt~dpUanue~ 02/1
TRAFFIC DIVISION
Monthly Activity Report
For January, 1994
Submitted by: Tim D. Serlet~~
Prepared by: Marry Lauber/~'/,~/
Date: February 1 O, 1994
I. TRAFFIC RFnUESTS
TRAFFIC REQUESTS: Nov Dec Jan
Received 7 17 16
Completed I 9 9
Under Investigation 6 6 7
Scheduled for Traffic Commission 3 2 0
II.
ON GOING PROJECTS:
Demonstrated Speed Monitoring Awareness Radar Trailer for Safe Traffic Cities
Task Force. This is part of the gram selection process through the Riverside
County Office of Education. The Program has currently allocated $6,000 but
might increase with matching funds. Total cost runs approximately $10,000.
Met with Caltrans to complete field review for Barrier Rail Replacement Program
- Empire Creek at Front Street - ($22,300)
C. Status of Design Projects - (See table below)
Nicolas Road/Winchester Road
Avenida Barca/Margarita Road
Margarita Road/S.R. 79 (S) **
Emergency Vehicle Pre-
Emption System
100% 90%
100% 90%
40% 0%
70% Preparing RFP
* * On hold awaiting funding commitment from Caltrans for matching funds.
r,~. !_bVt%UefrlcW4'denuery 02/10/114e~
LAND DEVELOPMENT
Monthly Activity Report
Special Projects
January, 1994
Submitted by: Tim D. Serlet
Prepared by: Raymond A. Casey
FFMA/OFS RFIMBURSFMFNT:
Staff is continuing to coordinate with the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and the
State Office of Emergency Services (OES) representatives in seeking reimbursement for costs
incurred by the City due to the January 1993 floods and ensuing disaster declaration, OES has
reimbursed the City an additional ~34,603 for a total of $235,857 to date,
LIEFER ROADIBRIDGF IPROJFCT Nn, PW93-O~h
· project is currently under construction. The existing utilities have been relocated and the
auutment over-excavation is ongoing. The next construction stage will be the forming and placing
of the bridge foundations and abutments.
pwOb'lmoaetmMev%94%januwy 021093
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
MEMORANDUM
Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
Brad Buron, Maintenance Superintendent
February 1, 1994
Monthly Activity Report - January 1994
The following activities were performed by Public Works Department, Street Maintenance Division
in-house personnel for the month of January 1994:
II.
III.
IV.
Ve
SIGNS
A. Total signs replaced
B. Total signs installed
C. Total signs repaired
TREES
A. Total trees trimmed for sight distance and street
sweeping concerns
POTHOLES
A. Total square feet of potholes repaired
CATCH BASINS
A. Total catch basins cleaned
RIGHT-OF-WAY WEED ABATEMENT
A. Total square footage for right-of-way abatement
GRAFFITI REMOVAL
A. Total locations
A. Total S.F.
VI.
23
41
19
49
108
168
4,500
52
8,404
Also, City Maintenance staff responded to 10 service order requests ranging from weed abatement,
tree trimming, sign repair, A.C. failures, litter removal, and catch basin cleanings.
This is compared to 17 service order requests for the month of December, 1993.
The Maintenance Crew has also put in 43 hours of overtime which includes standby time, P.M.
surveillance {weekends only), and response to street emergencies.
-1 - pwOE~roede~aG~pt/4~01 020794
---. MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT - January, 1994
Page 2
ORANt4;: COUNTY STRIPINn AND STI:NCll INn COMPANY rms comoleted the followino:
·
156,652 L.F. of new and repainted striping
0 L.F, of sand blasting
0 L.F. of red curb
0 new and repainted legends
The total cost for Orange County striping service was $13,246.17 compared to $36,362.49 for
December, 1993.
The total cost for Street Maintenance performed by Contractors for the month of January, 1994 was
$38,342.70 compared to $54,809.61 for the month of December, 1993.
Account No. 5402
Account No. 5401
$28,696.12
89,646.50
CC:
Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects
Raymond A. Casey, Principal Engineer - Land Development
Martin C. Lauber, Traffic Engineer
-2- pwOS~romde~mpt~4~01 020794
MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT - January, 1994
Page 3
STREET MAINTENANCE CONTRACTORS
The following contractors have performed the following project for the month of December.
DEL RIO CONTRACTORS
Account No. 5401
Date: January 20, 1994
Deportola Channel
Remove debris and silt grade channel to flow install riprap 279' in length to protect Deportola Street.
Total rip-rap 310 tons
ARBOR-PRO TRFF SFRVIC;
Account No. 540:~
Date: January 4, 1994
42994 Agena Street and surround area
Trimmed 6 trees for mail delivery, trash pick-up & sweepers
Total trees 6
NELSON PAVING AND SEALING
Account No. 5409
Date: January 5, 1994
40415 Calla Fiesta N/E of Via Norte
TOTAL COST: $9,646.50
TOTAL COST:
50.00
Saw cut approximately 44 lin. ft. of asphalt paving, remove, and dispose of legally. Place SS-1H
material prior to placement of asphalt paving. Asphalt patch approximately 240 sq. ft. with A/R
4000 3/8" asphalt material; Clean asphalt paving to install asphalt overlay. Place SS-1H material
prior to asphalt overlay. Furnish and place 1" ( + or -) of AIR 4000 3/8" fine asphalt material in order
to construct asphalt overlay. Clean cracks free of debris and vegetation, treat cracks with ground
sterilizer, and fill cracks with ample amount of crack filler material.
Total S.F. 240
Total A.C. 6 Tons
TOTAL COST: e1,936.0u
4- pwOb'Voecle%a~trpt~J4~01 020794
MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT - January, 1994
Page 4
AAA PAVINn CO.
Account No. 540~
Date: January 24, 1994
North General Kearney Road between Margarita and Calle Pitm Colada
Apply tack coat and install. 10' thick asphalt overlay
Apply petromat fabric prior to installing asphalt
Total A.C. 149 Tons
Total S.F.A.C. 20,592 @ .2361S.F.
Total S.F. Fabric 39,600 ~) .105/S.F.
MONTELEONE EXCAVATING
Account No. 540~
Date: January 28, 1994
Rancho California Road elo Kaiser Parkway - Slope Repair
2.
3.
4.
Export of 75 Tons of material
Re-establish original flowline
Widen walkway approx. 3' wide. by 80' long·
Re-grade slope to 2:1
NELSON PAVING
Account No. 540~
Data: January 26, 1994
Jefferson Street ~) Calle Cortez
Repair two banner poles
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL COST:
$9,017.71
$975.00
86,800.00
-4- pwOS%roade~eots1~t~94%01 020794
MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT - January, 1994
Page 5
Pt:STMAST;R S;RVICFS
Account No. 5409
Date: Month of January
Right-of-way weed control program
Completion to date: 124 sites; 839, 102 sf (50.4%)
TOTALCOST:
~9,817.49
pwOS~reede~e~trpt%94~01 020794
CITY OF TEMECULA
DATE
01-04-94
01-10-94
01-10-94
01-12-94
01-14-94
01-19-94
0/~-~4-94
0 ,-z5-94
01-27-94
01-27-94
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
WORK COMPLETED
JANUARY 1994
SERWCE ORDER REQUEST LOG
LOCATION
31630 Pio Pico Road
100 Calla Cortez
31067 Corte Anza
30463 Danube Court
32381 Circle Latour
Front Street across from Shire
Antique Shop
Rancho Calif. Road W/O Calle Tajo
Rancho Calif. Road E/O Margarita
42224 Roanoake Street
30121 Via Arboleda
REQUEST
Potholes
Pothole
Sweeper concern
Tree trimming
Pothole
Broken grate
Graffiti
Hazardous materials spill
Trash pick-up concern
Trash pick-up concern
WORK COMPLETED
01-05-94
01-11-94
01-11-94
0:1-12-94
01-14-94
01-19-94
01-25-94
01-25-94
01-27-94
01-27-94
TOTAL SOR'S 10
BDATE
01-03-94
01-05-94
01-05-94
01-05-94
01-05-94
01-05-94
01-05-94
01-05-94
01-07-94
01-07-94
01-07-94
01-07-94
01-07-94
01-10-94
01-10-94
01-11-94
01-11-94
01-11-94
01-11-94
01-11-94
01-12-94
01-12-94
01-12-94
01-12-94
LOCATION
Ecluity Drive N/O County Center
Montelegro 6) Pio Pico
Pio Pico ~) Redondela
Montelegro S/O McGabe
McGabe ~ Amarita
Amarita @ Santiago
Margarita ~) Golf Course
Temeku Golf Course
Temecula Cemetary
Humber ~ Rancho Calif. Road
Margarita ~) Southern Cross
Rancho Calif. Rd. ~ Tajo
Rancho Vista @ Tajo
28497 Pujol Street
La Serena ~) Camino Corto
La Serena @ Via Puerta
Camino del Este
Camino del Este @ Camino Verde
Via Puerta @ Camino Verde
Margarita ~) Rancho Vista
E.M.W.Do R.O.W.
28497 Pujol
Pujol @ Main Street Bridge
Rancho Vista ~ Calls Rio Vista
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
WORK COMPLETED
JANUARY 1994
GRAFFITI REMOVAL
WORK COMPLETED
Removed 40 S.F. of Graffiti
Removed 20 S.F. of Graffiti
Removed 10 S.F. of Graffiti
Removed 10 S.F. of Graffiti
Removed 8 SoF. of Graffiti
Removed 2 S.F. of Graffiti
Removed ' 4 S.F. of Grsffiti
Removed 758 S.F. of Graffiti
Removed' 320 S.F. of Graffiti
Removed 240 S.F. of Graffiti
Removed 20 S.F. of Graffiti
Removed 35 S.F. of Graffiti
Removed 132 S.F. of Graffiti
Removed 140 S.F. of Grsffiti
Removed 758 S.F. of Graffiti
Removed 403 S.F. of Graffiti
Removed 16 S.F. of Graffiti
Removed 871 S.F. of Graffiti
Removed 368 SoF. of Graffiti
Removed 8 S.F. of Graffiti
Removed 396 S.F. of Graffiti
Removed 60 S.F. of Graffiti
Removed 10 S.F, of Graffiti
Removed 442 S.F. of Graffiti
- 1 - pwO3Veed8%~i)1 ,Grefliti 020894
Grq=lTI - January, 1994
01-12-94
01-14-94
01-14-94
01-20-94
01-21-94
01-24-94
01-24-94
01-25-94
01-25-94
01-26-94
01-26-94
0/"*~-94
02-z8-94
01-31-94
01-31-94
01-31-94
01-31-94
Yukon ~) Red River
La Serene Between Via Aguila &
Via Puerta
Ynez (i) Tower Plaza
41859 Skywood
26469 Ynez
Pujol Apt. Complex
28550 Pujol
Rancho Calif. Rd. between Tajo &
Baja Vista
43025 & 43280 Business Park Dr.
43339 Business Park Drive
Paloma del Sol (9 locations)
(Pio Pico e Montelegro)
Winchester EIO Diaz
28497 Pujol
28497 Pujol
28535, 28516, 28545 Pujol
27423 Ynez Road
27555 Ynaz Road
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
260 S.F. of Graffiti
450 S.F. of Graffiti
12 S.F. of Graffiti
120 S.F. of Graff'~i
6 S.F. of Graffiti
1,120 S.F. of Graffiti
150 S.F. of Graffiti
120 S.F. of Graffiti
90 S.F. of Graffiti
150 S.F. of Graffiti
126 S.F. of Greffiti
90 S.F. of Graffiti
300 S.F. of Graffiti
196 S.F. of Graffiti
12 S.F. of Grsffiti
45 S.F. of Graffiti
86 S.F. of Graffiti
TOTAL LOCATIONS 5.~
TOTAL S.F. 8.404
-2- imwO3Veede~wk~lOl .Gmffitl 020894
CITY OF TEMECULA
DATE
01-.03-g4
01-.04-g4
01-06-94
01-19-94.
01-25-94.
01-31-94.
01-31-94.
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
WORK COMPLETED
JANUARY 1994
C,A TCH BASINS
I LOCAT!ON
lama 3 (See Dally for locations) I
I Area 3 (See Dally for locations) I
Area 3 (See Dally for locations)
Area 3 (See Dally for locations)
Area I thru 4 (Rain)
Area 4 (See Dally for locations)
Area 3 (See Dally for locations)
I WORK COMPLETED
Cleaned and secured
Cleaned and secured
Cleaned and secured
Cleaned and secured
Cleaned and secured
Cleaned and secured
Cleaned and secured
QUANTITY
48 basins
41 basins
31 basins
16 basins
13 basins
12 basins
7 basins
TOTAL CATCH BASINS
CLEANED AND SECURED 168
-1- pw03~ede%wkempiM~4~01.CB 020794
DATE
0 1-03-94
01-03-94
01-04-94
(r 9-94
ol -04-94
ol-04-94
ol-o5-94
ol -05-94
ol -o6-94
ol -o6-94
o1-12-94
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
WORK COMPLETED
JANUARY 1994
TREE
LOCATION
Coronade Drive ~) Ynez Road
Pauba Road E/O Ynez Road
VIlla Alturas e) Pauba
Ynez Road ~) Calla Halcon
42901 Domino Place
30194 Villa Alturae
Pauba Road W/O La Primavers
31540 Pio Pico Road
24781 Lea VIoletas
Mira Lores et Clubhouse
Rancho VIsta ~) Meadows
Parkway
TRIMMING
WORK COMPLETED
Trimmed I tree for
Trimmed I tree for
Trimmed I tree for
Trimmed I tree for
Trimmed I tree
Trimmed I tree
Trimmed 37 trees
Trimmed 2 tree
Trimmed I tree
Trimmed I tree
Trimmed 2 trees
sight distance
sight distance
sight distance
sight distance
for sight distance
for sight distance
for sight distance
for sight distance
for sight distance
for sight distance
for sight distance
TOTAL 49 trees rimmed
i)wO3boeclB~wk~t01 .t/e 020794
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
WORK COMPLETED
JANUARY 1994
IDATE
01-04-94
01-05-94
01-06-94
01-10-94
01-10-94
01-11-94
01-28-94
WEED ABATEMENT
LOCATION
Jededlah Smith ~1~ Hwy. 79 $.
Pauba WIO La Primavera
Pauba E/O La Pdmevera
I Winchester O Jefferson
Humbar Between Red River &
Danube Court
Rancho Calif. Rd. 1/2 W/O City
Limit
30900 Buena Suerte
WORK COMPLETED
Cleared
Cleared
Cleared
l Cleared
Cleared.
Cleared
Cleared
300 $.F.
685 $.F.
1,700 S.F.
200 S.F.
95 S.F.
1,500 S.F.
20 S.F.
R.O.W. Weeds
R.O.W. Weeds
R.O.W. Weeds
R.O.W. Weeds
R.O.W. Weeds
R.O.W. Weeds
R.O.W. Weeds
TOTAL S.F.
WEEDS ABATED
-1 - pwO3Veede%wkemldlgA01 .Wee 020794
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
WORK COMPLETED
JANUARY 1994
DATE LOCATION
01-03,94 I Santiago E/O Ynez
01-03-94
01-03-94
De Portola W/O Mergerits
De Portola W/O Margarits
Area #2 (See Dally for locations)
SIGNS
01-06-94
01-11-94
01-12-94
0 1-12-94
01-12-94
01-13-94
01-18'94
01-19-94
Jadedish Smith ~) Margarits
Ynez ~) Palm Plaza
Margarits Road ~it De Portola
Meadows'Parkway ~) Pauba
N. Gen'l Kearney (i) Cross
Margarits Between Winchester & Solana
6th 0 Felix Valdez
Margarits ~) Gen'l Keamey
Rancho Vista EIO El .Greco
01-19-94
01-19-94
01-19-94
01-19-94
01-20-94
01-,-26-94
01-27-94
Margarits ~1) Rancho California Road
Calla Medusa NIO Monoquie Circle
Calla Medusa ~) Kaweah
Rancho California Road ~) Humbar
Calla Medusa N/O Evers
Randto Vista EIO Margarits
Rancho Vista FJO Margarits
WORK COMPLETED
, _~--,
Repaired W-41
Repaired 10 signs (See Dally)
Replaced 3 signs (See Dally)
Repaired 4 signs
Replaced 9 signs
Replaced I R-1 Graffiti
Replaced I K-Marker Missing
Replaced W-53 Faded
Installed 3 R-l. 2 W-17. 3 R-1A
Installed 2 R-2 "25"
Installed 4 R-2 "45"
Replaced W-5 Missing
. Installsad G-7-1
Replaced R-2 "45" I R-1 Graffiti
(Missing)
Repaired. "Bike Routs" end RTA Schedule
Replaced R-2 "25" faded
Replaced 2 R-1 faded
Repaired 2 R-2 "45"
Replaced R-2 "25" faded
Installed 11 R-26/R-18 Modified W-11
Removed 76 Signs (Bee Dally)
Installed W-11, R-63, W-75 4 carsonitss
pwO3Voede%wkmqdtd~4%01 .age1 020894
IlGNI oJemmry, 1184 ¢II
01-31-94
Rancho Ca!if. Rd. E/O Meadows
Parkway
I Via Norta E/O Paseo Sereno
Installed
IReplaced
5 Carsonites '"N" Marker
I carsonita
TOTAL SIGNS REPLACED ~-q
TOTAL SIGNS INST/q I Fn 41
TOTAL SIGNS REPAIRED 19
'
pw03~reade~wkemlmltd~41D1 .sgn 020894
~J
TEMECULA COMMUNITY
SERVICES DISTRICT
ITEM
1
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
HELD FEBRUARY 8, 1994
A regular meeting of the Temecula Community Services District was called to order at 11:21
PRESENT: 5 DIRECTORS: Birdsall, Parks, Mufioz, Roberts,
Stone
PM.
ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None
Also present were City Manager David F. Dixon, City Attorney Scott F. Field end June S.
Greek, City Clerk.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None given.
CONSENT CALENDAR
It was moved by Director Roberts, seconded by Director Muftoz to approve Consent Calendar
Items 1.
AYES: 5 DIRECTORS: Birdsall, Mufioz, Parks, Roberts, Stone
NOES: 0 DIRECTORS: None
ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None
Minutes
1.1
Approve the minutes of the meeting of 25, 1994.
GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT
None given.
COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR REPORT
None given.
CITY ATTORNEY REPORT
None given.
Mbtutls1020894 -1- 02/18/94
CSD Minutes Feburary 8. 1994
DIRECTORS REPORTS
Director Birdsall announced she is awaiting appointment to the National League of Cities
Committee on Community Services, and should have word in the next 10 days.
Director Roberrs asked that the matter of a memorial in the Kent Hintergardt park be placed
on the next agenda.
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Director Muf~oz, seconded by Director Roberts to adjourn at 11: 12 PM to
· meeting on February 22, 1994 at 7:00 PM, Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol
Street, Temecula, California. The motion was unanimously carried.
Jeff Stone, President
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk\TCSD Secretary
Minul~W020694 -2- 02JI
ITEM
NO.
2
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY ~_~
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
General Manager/Board of Directors
FROM:
Mary Jane McLarney, Finance Officer.
DATE:
February 22, 1994
SUBJECT:
Review and Approval of the Fiscal Year 1993-94 Mid-Year Budget
PREPARED BY: Luci Romero, Financial Services Administrator
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO CSD 94-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AMENDING THE
FISCAL YEAR 1993-94 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGETS
DISCUSSION: Each year a mid-year review is conducted of the Temecula Community
Services District (TCSD) fiscal year operating budgets. The purpose of this review is to
conduct an analysis of revenues and expenditures to ensure that the TCSD maintains a
prudent and healthy fiscal position. The Finance Department staff has performed the analysis
of revenues. Additionally, TCSD staff has reviewed the operating budgets and has submitted
year-end expenditure projections.
Activity in each of the funds is presented in accordance with the following schedules:
Schedule A - Budget Summary: Illustrates Fund Balance activity in terms of both the
currently adopted budget and the recommended mid-year amended budget. Schedule
A presents the beginning fund balance, revenues, expenditures and transfers, and the
projected fund balance based upon this activity.
Schedule B - Revenue Detail: Illustrates the revenue detail by fund source in terms of
current projections, year-to-date received at 12/31/93, and mid-year revised
projections.
Schedule C - Expenditure Summary: Illustrates summaries of expenditures by each
department within a fund. The expenditures categories are Personnel Services,
Operating Expenditures, and Capital Outlay.
Schedule A illustrates a projected fund balance of e 1,120,379at June 30, 1994, an increase
of 8554,819 over the beginning fund balance.
Schedule B illustrates a revised revenue projection of ~3,146,490,an increase of $554,630,
or approximately 18%. The increase in revenue to primarily attributable to the one time Teeter
Plan adjustment of $504,804, for prior year property tax delinquencies.
Schedule C illustrates increases and decreases in expenditures which net out positively.
Requested increases in expenditures include tree trimming and sod/turf at Rancho California
Sports Park. Additionally, amended appropriations reflect the installation of perimeter split rail
fencing at Kent Hintergardt Memorial Park.
Mid-year adjustments in the remaining TCSD Departments do not impact the current
assessments. The adjustments for TCSD Service Levels A through D are as follows:
Service Level A: Revenues reflect an increase of $39,162, due to Investment Interest
and the Teeter Plan one-time adjustment. No net increase in expenditures.
Service Level B: Revenues reflect an increase of $21,039, primarily due to Investment
Interest and the Teeter Plan one-time adjustment. Expenditures reflect a decrease due
to salary savings.
Service Level C: Revenues reflect an increase of $53,299, primarily due to Investment
Interest and the Teeter Plan one-time adjustment. No net increase in expenditures.
Service Level D: Revenues reflect an increase of $131,148, primarily due to
Investment Interest and the Teeter Plan one-time adjustment. No net increase in
expenditures.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The mid-year adjusted budget projections result in an increase in the year-end fund balance
of $554,819 and no impact on current assessment rates.
Attachments: Resolution
Schedules A through C:
- TCSD
- Service Levels A through D
Exhibit I Capital Projects and Debt Service Funds
Exhibit II - Personnel Allocation By Department
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 94-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 1993-94 ANNUAL
OPERATING BUDGETS
WHEREAS, each year a mid-year review is conducted of all Temecula Community
Services (TCSD) operating budgets.
WHEREAS, the purpose of this review is to conduct an analysis of revenues and
expenditures to ensure that the Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) maintains a
prudent and healthy fiscal position.
WHEREAS, the mid-year review has been completed and the recommended adjustments
are reflected in Schedules A through C of all TCSD operating budgets.
The Board of Directors does hereby resolve as follows:
Section 1. That the Fiscal Year 1993-94 TCSD operating budgets are amended in
accordance with Schedules A through C.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 22nd day of February, 1994.
ATTEST:
Jeff Stone, President
lune S. Greek, City Clerk/District Secretary
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMEC~A)
I HERI~.Ry CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Board of
Directors of the Temecula Community Services District at a regular meeting thereof, held on
the 22rid day of February, 1994, by the following vote of the Board of Directors:
BOARDMEMBERS:
NOES:
BOARD1VIE1VIBERS:
ABSENT: BOAP, D1VIERIBERS:
June S. Greek, City Clerk/District Secretary
8CHE~)UI.~ A
Revenue
ExpendiNres
Excess of Revenues Over Expenditures
Transfers fTom (to) Other Funds
Increase (decrease) in Fund Balehoe
Fund BalBnce. July 1, 1993
Fund Balance, June 30, 1994
FYea-e,i FYeS-N F'Yea-N F'Yea-N
~ YTD AMENDED VARIANCE
BUDQET i 12/31/93 BUDGET FAV/(UNFAV)
2,591.860 $ 84,845
3.146,490
2,163.321 1,063,310 2.163,132
$ H4,m
42e~ae {968.465} 983,ase 554,8~9
(S0S.000)
554,819
$ 554,819
TEMECXA.A COkedLNk~TY 8ERVK:E8 DIb"'ll~CT
e4ERVICELEVELA
BUDGET 8UMMArlY
SCHEDULE A
Revenue
Expendlturee
Inomsse (d®omsse) In Fund Balanes
Fund Balm, duly 1,199~
Fund Balanoe, June 30, 1994
FY9844 FY93-;4 FYOS-G4 Fy9344
CURRENT YTD AMENDED VARIANCE
BUDGET @ 12)'31/93 BUDGET FAV/(UNFAV)
$ 157,004 $ e4S
196.466 $ 89,162
157,304 72,429 157,304
$ ('/1,781) 39,162 39.162
62,762
52,762
$ 91,627 $ 39,162
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICE8 DISTRICT
8ERVICELEVELB
B~ BUMMARY
SCHEDULE A
Revenue
Ex. pendtn'es
Increase (decrease) in Fund Balance
Fund Balanoe, July 1, 19,03
Fund Balance, June 30, 1994
F"Yoa-N FYOa-N FYos.o4 FYe344
CURRENT YI'D AMENDED VARIANCE
BUDGET ~ 12/31/93 BUDGET FAVI(UNFAV)
$ 191,786 $ 2,676
212,804 S 21,0~
191,766 77.828 179,816 11 .N9
$ (75,152) 32,068 32,ee8
$ 121,696 $ 32,988
TEMECULA COMMUNITY 8F. RVICE8 DISTRICT
8ERVTCELEVELC
BUDGET SUMMARY
SCHEDULEA
RIIVe~ILle
Expenditures
Ine'eese (demame) in Fund Balance
Fund Balance. July 1. 1993
Fund Balanca, June 30, 1994
FYOe44 FYOa-O4 FY93-94 I:YOe-N
CLR:IRENT YI'D AMENDED VARIANCE
BUDGET ~ 12/31/92 BUDGET FAV/(UNFAV)
422.801 $ 14,6~0
476.1 O0 I 53,29~
441.60~ 296,459 441,603
(le,eo2)
228J17
210,015
228,817
263,314 $ 53,299
SCHEDULE A
Revenue
Expenditures
Increase (decmue) In Fund Balanoe
Fund Balance, July 1, 1993
Fund Balance. June 30, 1994
Fvee44 Fves-e4 FVea-N Fvea~4,
CUIIRENT YTD AMENDED VARIANCE
BUDGET ~ 12/31/93 BUDGET FAV/(UNFAV)
$ 1.379,730 $ 811
1,419.000
(4,7s.~)
1.510.878
1A19,000
91,878
126,417
$ 131,148
131,148
S 131,148
-jlfllll.,~irltl
-Miscel|aneous
-investment Innrat
-Operating Tramlea In
-Public Use Permit
TOTAL DEFT 180
-Contribulioris
TOTAL DEFT 181
· ~L. ,~: ,'.: -.., :,L ,
-Aquaffc~
-Classes/Aclivffie~
-Contracted CIm
.-Day Camp
-Excursions
-Field Rentals/Lights
-Indoor Rentel/
-Spedel Events
-Sports
TOTAL DEPT 183
TEETER PLAN ONE TIME ADJUST.
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
REVENUE DETAIL
BY FUND SOURCE
SCHEDULE B
~,,agel
FY93~4 FY93-94 FY93-94 FY93-94
CURRENT YTD REVISED ADJIa"'TMENT
BUDGET ~) 12/31/93 PROJECTION FAV/(UNF,AV)
2,415,360 1,088 2,415,360 0
0 0 0 0
0 475 475 475
0 .3,211 48,307 48,307
0 0 0 0
0 1,044 1,044 1,044
0 0 0 0
2,415,360 5,817 2,465, 186 49,826
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
28,500 17,550 28,500 -', 0
2,000 1,205 2,000 0
20,000 7,256 20,000 0
37,500 17,763 37,500 0
7,500 4,819 7,500 0
12,000 2,741 12,000 0
3,(XX) 0 3,000 0
7,000 3,266 7,000 0
59,000 24,425 59,000 0
0
79,026 176,500 0
-AsseBmer~
-Investment Interest
-,Smt Lighting Fees
TELrrER PLAN ONE TIME ADJUST.
TOTAL FUND 1 91
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICE8 DISTRICT
REVENUE DETAIL
BY FUND SOURCE
SCHEDULE B
BUDGET (~ 12/31/83 PROJEOTION FAVI(UNF&V)
157.304 0 157.304 0
0 648 3.146 3.146
0 0 0 0
0 0 36.016 36.016
157,304 648 196,486 39.162
-Aseessmena 191,762 21 191,765 0
-Inve~,,,ent Interest 0 1.412 3.835 3.835
-Street I.igMing Fees 0 1,243 1,243 1,243
TEETER PLAN ONE TIME ADJUST. 0 0 15,961 15,g91
TOTAL FUND 192
/_:Asses___.-ments
lecovery of Assessments
-Investn~ent Interest
-Public Use Permit
-Specific Plan
-Dedication Fees
-Landscape Ran Check
-Landscape Inspeclion
TEETER PLAN ONE TIME ADJUST.
TOTAL FUND 193
-Assessments
-Investmere Interest
TEETER PLAN ONE TIME ADJUST.
TOTAL FUND 194
191,785 2,576 21 2,804 21
422,801 0 422,801 0
0 0 0 0
0 3,749 8,456 8,456
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 7,526 7,526 7,526
0: 3,375 3,3/S
0 0 33,942 33,B42
422,801 14,850 476,100
1.376.730 0 1.370.730 0
0 811 27.595 27,595
0 0 103.553
1.379.730 811 1.510.878 131.148
Tot~ Depm
Personned ,Services
Operating Expenditures
Capital Outlay
Total Department
TEMECULA COMMUNITY 8ERVK:IS DISTRICT
EXPENDmX:IE 84.NMARY
BY DEPARTMENT
CURRENT YI'D AMENDED ADJUSIit9~
BUDGET ~ 12/31/93 APPROPRIATION FAV/(UNFAV)
610,385 266,815 626,406 (16,021)
1,122,943 568,269 1,086,922 36,021
32,450 20.119 52,450 (20,000)
1,765,778 855,223 1,7ei,778 0
46,070 10,933 47,914 (1,844)
34,580 11,91 6 32,736 1,844
0 0 0 0
80,650 31,849 80,650 0
71 ,g'/9 34,910 71 ,TgO 18~
47,750 24,854 47.750 I~, 0
0 0 0 0
119,729 59,773 119,540 189
Personnel Services 76,403 56,904 91,093 (14,600)
Operating Expires 120,671 49,561 106,071 14,600
Capital Outlay 0 0 0 0
Total Department
TCSD
OPERATING TRANSFER OUT
197,164 106,465 197,164 0
2,163,321 1,053,310 2,163,132
2,668,321 1,053,310 2,668, 132 18~
ope~ng ~
cap~ o~
TOTAL FUND 191
Personnel Services
Operating Expenditures
Capital Outlay
TOTAL FUND I g2
Personnel 8erv~m
~_--Operating Expenditures
;apital Outlay
TOTAL FUND 193
TOTAL FUND 194
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
EXPENDlit. RE 8UMI/_a~Y
BY DEPARTMENT
SCHEDULE C
FY9344 FY9344 FYg344 FY9344
CURRENT YTD AMENDED N3JUSTMENT
BUDQET O 12/31/83 APPROPRIATION FAAV/(UNFAV)
20,002 12,088 22,667 (2,8136)
137,30; 60,341 134,607 2,685
0 0 0 0
26,253 326 14,304 11,949
165,512 77,502 165,512 0
0 0 0 0
1 91,765 77,828 179,816 11,9't9
372,651 264,588 366,407 6,244
0 0 0 0
441,603 296,460 441,603 0
0 0 0 0
1,41 9,000 674,606 1,41 9,000 0
0 0 0 0
1,41 9,000 674,606 1,41 9,CXX) 0
TOTAL ALL TCSD DEPARTMENTS
4,877,993 2,176,632 4,865,855 12,138
TEMECULA COMMUNITY ;4;RVICE~ DI~'RICT
CAPITAL PROJECT8 FUND
BUDGET BUMMARY
EXHIBIT I
Revenue
Expenditures
Excess of Revenues Over ~ilures
Operating Tr'm'mfem In
Increase (decrease) in Fund Balm
Fund Balm, July 1, 1 ll9
Fund Balance, June 30, 1994
BUDGET
$ 3,065,477
(3,0eS,4n)
2,6"75,410
$ 1,429,271
4,~
3,~,g
Revenue
Expenditure
Excess of Revenue~ Over Expendlares
Operating Tmrmfem In
Increase (decrea~) in Fund Balm
Fund Balm, July 1, lgg3
Fund Balance, June 30, I gg4
1EMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICE8 DISTRICT
DEBT SERVICE FUND
BUDGET BUMMARY
FYg3-94
BUDGET
1,101,608
F'V'a~94
@ 12/31m
S 50,152
EXHIBIT II
PRR~ONNF, T. AT~LDcATJON ry DPPARTMF, NT
Aummi~d
CO~ SI~RVIC!~
MidY~m'
1993-94
Director of Comm,m~y Services
Seuior Mam$maeat Aamlyst
Recrcadoa Smqx-aime,,de,,,
Maimemnce Sujx..;.~lc-n,'te~
Rccreadon Supervisor
Admlniem~ve Secretary
Msintensnce WoxJ~
Vol~ ~
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
1.00
2.00
ZOO
1.00
9.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
1.00
2.00
2.00
1.133
?.00
Departmeat Total
~" I:~~: S]~RVICE LEV'g,, A
14.00
14.00
Detriment: SEIRVICE LEVEL B
0.45
0.45
0.00
0.00
0.4~
0.4S
Deearmmnt: S:B:RVIC:E LEV]~ C
1.00
1.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
1.00
1 ,,,miscs, l:e h~SpeClOT
lklazmmat Toad
1.00
0.55
0.00
0.00
1.00
0.~
Tot~ Commu~t~ Services ~0.0~~
ITEM NO. 3
APPROVAl
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
Board of Directors
FROM:
David F. Dixon, General Manager
DATE:
February 22, 1994
SUBJECT: Acceptance of Grant Deed for Remainder of Sam Hicks
Monument Park.
PREPARED BY: ~.~ ~ Beryl Yasinosky, Management Assistant
/
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors:
Accept a grant deed from the Sam Hicks Monument Park Foundation for the remaining parcel
within Sam Hicks Monument Park.
BACKGROUND: On October 9, 1990, City Council accepted a grant deed and
land lease agreement from the Sam Hicks Monument Park Foundation for the dedication of
Sam Hicks Monument Park to the City. The park is located at the southeast corner of Moreno
Road and Mercedes Street. The amenities of the park currently offer a tot lot area, shade
trees, and picnic tables. However, a master plan of the park will be forthcoming to the Board
of Directors which will include the construction of a museum, renovation of the church
building, rest room facilities, walking paths, and other site improvements.
The entire park facility is actually comprised of two separate parcels. The larger parcel,
identified as 921-070-016, was dedicated to the City on October 9, 1990. The smaller
parcel, identified as 922-023-011, has remained with the Sam Hicks Monument Park
Foundation, even though both parcels have been maintained by the TCSD as Sam Hicks
Monument Park since acceptance of the first grant deed.
FISCAL IMPACT: Costs for maintaining this park have already been included within
the TCSD Rates and Charges for Community Services, Parks, and Recreation for FY 1993-94.
No additional costs will be incurred by the acceptance of the grant deed for this parcel.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Site/Location Map.
2. Staff Report 10/9/1990 and grant deed for first parcel.
3. Copy of grant deed for second parcel.
r:%yeeinobk%eemhks
042284
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
MEETING DATE
SUBJECT:
CITY MANAGER/CITY COUNCIL
SCOTF F. FIELD, CITY ATTORNEY
OCTOBER 4, 1990
OCTOBER 9, 1990
SAM HICKS PARK
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council accept the offer of dedication of
Sam Hicks Park subject to the reverter contained in the Grant Deed and the
Declaration of Restrictions, and subject to the Old Town Temecula
Foundation approving the revised land lease for the Museum.
DISCUSSION: Last July, the City Council considered the offer from the Sam
Hicks Park Foundation to dedicate Sam Hicks Park to the City~ The CSD has
budgeted funds to maintain the Park. The Old Town Temecula Foundation
has an existing lease of a portion of the Park and they intend to raise funds
to build and operate a museum.
When the City Council considered this matter last July, they directed the
City Attorney to attempt to revise the documents to clarify how the Park
would be used, and to seek to renegotiate the museum lease in order to
reduce the lease term, improve the terms of insurance, and establish a time
for construction of the museum.
The City Attorney revised the documents and sent them out for review by
the parties on August 6, 1990, and the Park Foundation replied on
September 10th. Accordingly, the restrictions on the property have been
expanded to allow the Park to be used for a historical, educational, public
park or public recreational purposes. This is a broader definition than the
limitation to park uses as originally proposed by the Foundation. The
Foundation has insisted that the reverter clause be retained in the property.
~/~GD14757
However, it has been modified to include the requirement that the
Foundation first notify the City of any alleged breach of the use restriction
and be given an opportunity to cure the breach before any attempt is made
to recover the property.
We have also revised the land lease to a forty (40) year term with 'a twenty
(20) year option. This is an improvement from the forty and forty year term
originally proposed. We have also included a five year construction schedule
in the lease as well as modifying the insurance provisions to require it to be
adjusted according to the CPI.
EXEMPT RECORDING REQUESTED BY
City of Temecula
PER GOV'T CODE § 6103
AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO
City of Temecula
43172 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92390
MAIL TAX STATEMENTS TO
City of Temecula
43172 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92390
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE
CORPORA TiON GRANT DEED
The undersigned grantor declares:.
FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged,
SAM HICKS MONUMENTPARK FOUNDATION, a non-profit corporation, a corporation
organized under the laws of the State of California, hereby grants to the CITY OF
TEMECULA, a body corporate and politic, the following described real property in the
City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California:
See Exhibit "A" attached hereto.
This conveyance is made subject to those covenants and restrictions contained in that
certain AgreemenT, executed by Nancy HauL'ice dated octobe= 9 ,19 90,
and recorded on Official Records of Riverside County, California and upon condition
that said property be used solely and perpetually for historical, educational, public park
and/or public recreational purposes. If said property is not used solely and perpetually
for historical, educational, public park and/or public recreational purposes, then
Grantor or its assigns, and successors, without paying any compensation for any
buildings or other improvements or betterments that may then be upon said premises,
and without making any compensation or incurring any liability for damages or losses
of any kind, shall have the power to terminate all right, title, and interest in the
property granted-by this deed to Grantee and its successors and assigns, in the
manner provided by law for the exercise of this power of termination, and shall
thereupon have and enjoy forever all property granted by this deed, as if'this
-1-
conveyance had not been made. Grantee, its assigns or successors, shall thereupon
immediately surrender possession of said property, and shall forfeit all rights thereto
as required hereunder.. Provided, however, that Grantor may not exercise this power
to terminate unless, within ninety (90) days after the breach of the use restriction,
written notice is given to the Grantee of the breach, and Grantee fails to correct the
breach within ninety (90) days after receiving notice of the breach of the use
restriction.
xecu d on April 9 , 19 91, at
President ~
Mail tax statements as directed above.
Temecula
, California.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA |
On this 9th day of April , in the year 199l, before me,
Susan W. Jones , a. notary public, personally appeared Nancy Maurice ,
proved to me on the basis of. satisfactory evidence to be the person who executed the
within instrument as president of the corporation therein named and acknowledged
to me that the corporation executed it.
Notary Public fo
State of California
My commission expires:
November 18 , 19 94
SLffiAN W. JONES
Notmy PuMc-Calfomla
RIVEaSIDE COUNnf
November 18. 1994
-2-
forth above.
CONSENT
The City of Temecula hereby consents to the grant of real property set
City of Temecula
By: R~onZl"jJ J. Parks
Mayor
Attest:
By:
~JJune S. Greek
City Clerk
Approved As To Form:
By:
Scott F Field
City AttOrney
-3-
EXHIBIT "A "
In the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, described as follows:
That portion of Lot 6, and of the unnamed road in Block 2, as shown by Map of
Subdivision of the Pauba Land and Water Company, in the County'of Riverside, State
of California, as shown by Map on file in Book 11, Page 507 of Maps, Records of San
Diego County, California, described as' follows:
Beginning at the most westerly corner. of Lot 32, BloCk 1, of the Town of Temecula
as shown by Map on file in Book 1 ~, Page 726 of Maps, Records of San Diego
County, California; thence South 44 degrees 25'05" West, along the Northwesterly
boundary of said town of Temecula, a distance of 141.45 feet to a point on the
Northerly right of way line of an unnamed road (60 feet wide) as 'described in
dedication and easement deed to the County of Riverside by deed recorded Apdl 22,
1969 as Instrument No. 39504 of Official Records of Riverside County, California;
thence Westerly continuing along said Northerly line being the arc of a tangent curve
concave Northerly and having a radius of 375.78 feet through a central angle of 19
degrees 01'17", a distance of 124.75 feet; thence North 17 degrees 08'42" East,
along the Easterly line of said unnamed road a distance of 290.87 feet; thence South
45 degrees 02'38" East, a distance of 271.1 6 feet to the point of beginning.
EXEMPT RECORDING REQUESTED BY
City of Temecula
· PER GOV'T CODE § 6103
AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
Office of the City Clerk
City of Temecula
43172 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
MAIL TAX STATEMENTS TO:
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE
GRANT DEED
The undersigned grantor declares:
FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged,
Sam Hicks Honument Park Foundation
hereby grants to the CITY OF TEMECULA, a body corporate and politic, the following
described real property in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of
California:
See Exhibit "A" attached hereto.
Executed on
Califo~_l~.' "'
013192
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
On,~,~f"',-- ~/'~'~ before me the unders' ned, A Notary Public in and for the State
of California, personally appeared
(or proved to me on the basis of satisfac~rr~ evidence) to be the person~d) whose nameJ~)
is/ar~subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that 4~elshe/the~ executed
the same in bis/her/thek-authorized capacity(iesh-and that by hislher/theirsignature(~) on the
instrument the person(~), or the entity upon behalf of which the personS) acted, executed the
instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
· Signature
CONSENT
The City of Temecula. hereby consents to the grant of real property set forth above, and is
accepted by order of the· Temecula City Council made on October 9, 1990.
ATTEST:
By: J~~.Gree'~k,'~
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By:
Scott F. Field, City Attorney
013182
3e/fetme/grerdeed
EXIIIBIT 'A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
SAM HICKS MONUMENT PARK
Parcel
Being a portion. of lots 17,18,19,20 in block 23, as shown on Map of the
Town of Temecula on file in Book 15, Page 726 of Maps, Records of the
Recorder of San Diego County, California, more particularly described
as follows:
That portion of said lots 17, l g, 19,20 lying northerly of the northerly
line of Mercedes Street, as described in a Deed to the County of
Riverside Recorded April 15, 1976 as instrument No. 50513 of Official
Records of Riverside County, California.
Said Parcel cA" contains 0.07 Acres more or less.
Subject to all covenants, conveyances, restrictions, reservations, rights,
right of way and casements, if any, of record.
See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by this reference made a part
hereof.
· ~ No. LS6240~
EXHIBIT
· 11 B II
A = 0'} 56' 15"
R · 4:~5.78'
L= 7.13'
TOWN
N 44° 25'05" E
/~.e,~
BLOCK 23
o2~, 23 22
OF T -:MECt LA
S.D.
25' 25'
SCALE: I" = 50'
NORTHERLY LINE
MERCEDES ST)
20 I 18
25; I
19.21'
N 44~' 22' 13" E
LEGEND
F///A
I. NDI CAT ES
CONTAINS
PARCEL "A",. A.P.N. 92f--023-011
O. 07 ACRES MORE OR LESS.
30' 30'
25'?
/
KRIS R. WINCHAK
LAND SURVEYING - PLANNING
SCALE: I
DRAWN 8Y: I( .V,/,
CHECKED BY: K.W.
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
SAM HICKS MONUMENT PARK
ITEM NO.
4
APPROVAl
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
Community Services Board of Directors
FROM:
David F. Dixon· General Manager
DATE:
February 22, 1994
SUBJECT:
PREPARED BY:
Contract Change Orders No. 12 through No. 13
Community Recreation Center - Phase II
Project No. PW92-29B
Dhawn D Nelson D:rector of Commumty Services
on Spa;nolo Pr;~c pal Engineer CapLI Projects
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Board of Directors approve Contract Change Orders No. 12 and No. 13 for the
Community Recreation Center - Phase II, Project No. PW92-29B, for labor, material· and
equipment in the amount of ~20,356.68.
BACKGROUND:
During the construction of the Community Recreation Center the following items of work have
resulted in a change to the contract:
CHANGF OR[)~'R NO. 19
Chemical Room Roof: The chemical storage room for both the community and wading
pools was designed without a roof structure. A deign has been provided to construct
a roof to match the architectural integrity of the existing structures. The roof will
provide security as well as protection from the sun and inclement weather for the
chemicals stored inside.
SUBTOTAL: $ 5,202.14
CHANG; ORDFRNO. 13
Ravseck Heater System: The heater's pump system for the athletic facilities needs to
be modified to meet the manufacturer's revised specifications for hot water circulation.
The modification requires that the original boiler pump be removed and two boiler
pumps of higher quality be installed.
pw13~gdrpt%94%0222%pw92-29b 021094
e
e
10.
Boiler Pumn l=lectric-l: Additional wiring needs to be installed to supply power to the
additional pump being added to the Raypeck Heater System.
Smoke Detectors: Electrical conduit and wiring needs to 'be installed to supply power
to the four (4) smoke detectors installed at various locations within the gymnasium
corridor, gallery, and multipurpose room.
Stage Area: The stage area walls and ceiling in the multipurpose room need to be
painted black to accommodate stage productions. This will provide a suitable back
drop for stage sets and lighting arrangements.
Handrails and ~-aurdrails: Handrails need to installed along three (3) stairways located
near the amphitheater, the northeast comer of the gym, and the stage. A gaurdrail
needs to be installed at the east end of the b/,ocher area for the community pool.
Rate Hardware: Install hardware to secure swing loaded gates in the open position.
The hardware will enable large groups of people and/or equipment to be passed
through the amphitheater and pool areas without the gates shutting behind them.
Pull Box: S.C.E. required the pull box to be increased in size to meet service connection
requirements.
Stainless Steel Covering: The Health Department required that a stainless steel wall
covering be installed adjacent to the food warmers in the kitchen.
Door Pulls: The door pulls need to be modified from 12" to 18" to accommodate the
specified panic bar hardware and satisfy the ADA requirements for door handle
accessibility.
Louvre Trim: Metal trim needs to be installed to complete the metal louvre installation
in the gymnasium. The metal trim will cover the louvre supports.
SUBTOTAL: $15,154.54
TOTAL: $.~0.356.68
FISCAL IMPACT:
The original contract was awarded in the amount of $4,196,400.00. Contract Change Orders
No.1 through No. 11 were approved for a total amount of $136,265.00. Contract Change
Orders No. 12 and 13 will increase the adjusted contract by an amount not to exceed
$20,356.68. The total adjusted contract amount for the project is $4,353,021.68.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Contract Change Order No. 12
2. Contract Change Order No. 13
pw131agdq}t~94%0222%pw92-29b 021094
City of Ternecula
43174 Business Park Drive · Temecula, California 92590
(909) 694-1989 · FAX [909) 694-1999
CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 12
CONTRACT NO. PW92-29B
PROJECT:
Commurdtv Recremlon Center - Phase II
SHEET ,.1.. of .2..
TO CONTRACTOR: T. P. Penick & Sons, Inc.
NOTE:
TNs change order is not effective until muDroved by the ;:rmineer.
THIS CHANGE PROVIDES FOR:
An INCRFASF in the following item:
Chemical Room Roof: The chemical storage room for both the community and wading
pods was designed without a roof structure. A design has been provided to construct
a roof to match the architectural integrity of the existing structures. The roof will
provide security as well as protection from the sun and inclement weather for the
chemicals stored inside.
TOTAL: $ 5,202.14
Original Contract Amount ................................. 84,196,400.00
Adjusted Contract Amount ................................. ;4,332,665.00
Change Order No. 12 ..................................... $ 5,202.14
Total Contract Amount .................................... ;4,337,867.14
Adjustment of Working Days .................................
10
Approved: Principal Engr. By: Cede:
pwi3~,.~p,,fZ-29b~o~mo.12 talON
CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 12 (~
CONTRACT NO. PW92-29B ,
SHEET _Z_ of _2_
We the undersigned contractor have given careful consideration to the change proposed and
hereby agree. If this proposal is approved,. that we will provide all equipment, furnish all
materials, except as may otherwise be noted above, and perform all services necessary for
the work.
Data AccaptaU: :?/'/
Name: ~/~/I~
(print)
If the contractor does not sign acceptance of this order, his attention is directed to the
requirements of the specifications as to proceeding with the ordered work and filing a written -
protest within the time therein specified.
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive · Temecula, California 92590
(909) 694-1989 · FAX (909) 694-1999
CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 13
CONTRACT NO. PW92-29B
Community Recreation Center - Ph.me II
SHEEr J_ of ~
TO CONTRACTOR: T. P. Penick & 8one, Inc.
NOTE:
This change order is not effective until anDroved bv the ;:naineer.
THIS CHANGE PROVIDES FOR:
An INCREASE in the following items:
RayDeck Heater System: The heater's pump system for the athletic facilities needs to
be modified to met the manufacturer's revised specifications for hot water circulation.
The modification requires that the original boiler pump be removed end two boiler
pumps of higher quality be installed.
Boiler PUmp Electrical: Additional wiring needs to be installed to supply power to the
additional pump being added to the Raypack Heater System.
Smoke netactors: Electrical conduit and wiring needs to be installed to supply power
to the four (4) smoke detectors installed at various locations within the gymnasium
corridor, gallery, and multipurpose room.
Staae Area: The stage area walls and ceiling in the multipurpose room need to be
painted black to accommodate stage productions. This will provide s suitable beck drop
for stage sets and lighting arrangements.
Handrails and Gaurdrails: Handrails need to installed along three (3) stairways located
near the amphitheater, the northeast corner of the gym, and the stage. A gaurdreil
needs to be installed at the east end of the bleacher area for the community pod.
e
Gate Hardware: Install hardware to secure spring loaded gates in the open position.
The hardware will enable large groups of people and/or equipment to be passed
through the amphitheater and pool areas without the gates shutting behind them.
Pull Box: S.C. E. required the pull box to be increased in size to meet service connection
requirements.
e
Stainless Steel Covering: The Health Department required that · stainless steel wall
covering be installed adjacent to the food warmers in the kitchen.
Door Pulls: The door pulls need to be modified from 12" to 18" to accommodate the
specified panic bar hardware and satisfy the ADA requirements for door handle
accessibility.
10.
CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 13
CONTRACT NO, PW92-29B
SHEET .2_ of _~_
Louvre Trim: Metal trim needs to be installed to complete the metal louvre installation
in the gymnasium. The metal trim will cover the louvre supports.
TOTAL: $15,154'.54
CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 13
CONTRACT NO. PW92-29B
SHEET _3_ of _3..
Original Contract Amount ................................. e4,196,400.00
Adjusted Contract Amount ............. ; ................... e4,337,867.14
Change Order No. 13 ..................................... $ 15,154,54
Total Contract Amount .................................... e4,353,021.68
Adjustment of Working Days .................................
25
Approved: Principal Engr. By: Date:
We the undersigned contractor have given careful consideration to the change proposed and'
hereby agree. If this proposal is approved, that we will provide all equipment, furnish all
materials, except as may otherwise be noted above, and perform all services necessary for
the work.
Date Accepted: =,~ -//-//-/~,~/'
By: /~Z_/I~'
(signature)
Name://'~YI~ ~O~F/'
(print)
(company's name)
Title:
If the contractor does not sign acceptance of this order, his attention is directed to the
requirements of the specifications as to proceeding with the ordered work and filing a written
protest within the time therein specified.
(121094
ITEM 5
APPROVAl
CITY ATTORNEY .~
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
Community Services Board of Directors
Dave Dixon, General Manager
February 22, 1994
Amendment to the Professional Service Agreement for
Coordinator for the Community Recreation Center
Project No. PW92-029B
a Project
PREPARED BY:
(~_Shawn .D. Nelson, Director of Community Services
Don Spagndo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Board of Directors:
Approve Amendment No. 3, extending the Professional Services Agreement for a
Project Coordinator for the Community Recreation Center, Project No. PW92-29B, for
an additional 36 days in an amount not to exceed e9,760.00.
Appropriate funds in the amount of ~9,760.00 from TCSD bond proceeds to account
number 250-190-129-5804.
DISCUSSION:
On December 8, 1992, the Board of Directors awarded a construction contract for phase II
of the Community Recreation Center to T.B. Penick & Sons, Inc. The adjusted contract
requires 255 working days to complete the project. The revised construction schedule requires
a final amendment to the Professional Services Agreement to extend the services of the
Project Coordinator an additional 36 days.
On March 24, 1993, Steven J. Ford entered into an Agreement with the City of Temecule for
Professional Services as a Project Coordinator for phase II construction of the Community
Recreation Center. The Agreement was amended to extend the services of the Project
Coordinator to coincide with the additional working days granted to the contractor.
Amendments No. I and No. 2 were approved November 29, 1993 end January 11, 1994
respectively.
pw13~agdq. t%94%O222~,frdanend.nd 0222
FISCAL IMPACT:
The original contract amount was for $52,800.00. The adjusted contract amount is
~68,420.00. Amendment No. 3 will increase the contract by $9,760.00 for a revised total
contract amount of $78,180.00. Approval of Amendment No. 3 will re~luire that the BoBrd
of Directors appropriate funds in the amount ~9,760.00 from TCSD bond proceeds to account
number 250-190-129-5804.
pw13%agdq~94%O222~frdemend.no3 0222
~l~f~T NO. 3
STEVEN J. FORD
CRC PR~ COORDINATOR
PURCHASE ORDER NO. 13849
The Agreement dated March 24, 1~3 Igtw~ th~ City ofTCroatia, and Steven L Ford (hea'ein
r~femd to as "Agreement") is hea~by amead~d aa follows:
Professional Servioe for the Community Remation Center
Projec~ Coordination Services
Community ~on Center
Sec~on I
I. The scope of mrviee~ as listed in exhibit * A" of t~.~ "A~ent" will ~ unchanged.
The need for an additional 36 working days for the proem require, that the aervieea of
the Project Coordinator be extended during this period.
Section
Compensation for services shall be total of all services described in this Amendment and shah
not exceed N'me Thousand Wine Hundred and Twenty Dollars ($9,760.00).
All above costs are eligible for funding through Tem~-ula Community Services District bond
proceeds. The total cost of this element of the project is summarized below:
Original Contract Amount
Amendment No, 1
Amendment No. 2
Adjusted Contract Amount
Proposed Amenthnent No. 3
$ 52,8(X).00
$ 5,280.00
$ 10.340.00
$ 68,420.00
$ 9.760.00
Total Contract Amount
$ 78.180.00
pw13~clrpt%94%O222Xfrclemend.no3 0222
Section 3
All other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain the same.
The parties hereto have executed this Agreemeat on the date and year above written.
ONSULTANT
B
By:
CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
, City Attorney
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, CityClerk
pw13~agdq~J4~O222~,kdemend.nckl 0222
DEPARTMENTAL
REPORT
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
Board of Directors
FROM:
David F. Dixon, General Manager
DATE:
February 22, 1994
SUBJECT: Departmental Report
PREPARED BY: ~ Shawn D. Nelson, Director of Community Services
DISCUSSION: Staff scheduled a Project Committee meeting for February 1, 1994 to discuss
the final design components for the Sam Hicks Monument Park Improvement Project. As a
result of this meeting, the project committee has approved the final design for this project.
It is scheduled that the master plan for this project will be reviewed by the Planning
Commission on March 7, 1994, the Community Services Commission on March 14, 1994,
and the Board of Directors on April 12, 1994. The Redevelopment Agency Agreement which
will provide funding for the Museum portion of the Project, will be presented to the Agency
at its April 12, 1994 meeting.
The Community Services Commission will discuss the installation of a memorial for Officer
Kent Hintergardt to be placed in Kent Hintergardt Memorial Park. Staff is anticipating support
by the Commission and will move forward with this project in the near future.
The dedication of Palome Del Sol Park is completed. This park will be utilized for Adult
Softball and Little League in March, 1994.
The Community Recreation Center (CRC) Project is moving forward st an excellent pace.
Staff is nearly completed with ordering the equipment and furniture needs for the CRC. It is
anticipated that the CRC will be completed towards the end of March, 1994. The dedication
ceremony will be scheduled for the end of March, 1994.
The firm of J. F. Davidson Associates Inc. facilitated a public workshop regarding the
skateboarding component of the Rancho California Sports Park Improvement Project on
Monday, January 31,1994 at 7:00 p.m. at the Old Town Temecula Senior Center. Input was
received in regards to skateboarding end roller hockey. A follow-up meeting with the project
committee will be scheduled for early March, 1994.
The construction of Riverton Park is now completed. It is anticipated that the 120 day
maintenance period will end in April, 1994. The park will be dedicated to the community in
May, 1994.
r.~e~egendie~deptOO4.edn 0214e4
Staff has met with the Temecula Town Association to execute a lease agreement for the
Northwest Sports Complex in the near future. The approval of this lease will be considered
by the Community Services Commission at the March 14, 1994 Commission meeting.
Staff is moving forward with the Loma Linda Park Project - Phase II. The plans are currently
in for plan check and it is hoped that this project will be out to bid by the end of February,
1994.
Staff started a new homebound meal program in January, 1994 for senior citizens who are
not able to travel to the Senior Center. Currently, the program has increased from 20 seniors
to 36 seniors per day who are participating in this program. Volunteers are assisting in this
program which is co-sponsored by the County of Riverside, Office on Aging Department.
Staff is currently working on potential construction options concerning the Pala Community
Park Project. During the past several weeks, this project was halted by the Public Works
Department because the ground was saturated with underground water, which resulted in
heavy equipment being unable to perform the required grading on the site. Further analysis
of the site has shown that the underground water table has risen from 9' to 12' below the
surface to the current level of 2' to 4' below the surface depending upon the area. Many
alternatives are currently being pursued by Public Works to determine what is the best course
of action to address this situation. This item will be forwarded to the Board of Directors for
consideration within the next 45 days.
r.~gendaa~deptOO4.mln -0214e4
REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY
ITEM
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
HELD FEBRUARY 23, 1993
A regular meeting of the Temecula Redevelopment Agency was called to order at 11:22 PM.
PRESENT:
5 AGENCY MEMBERS: Birdsell, Mufioz, Roberts,
Stone, Parks
ABSENT: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None
Also present were Executive Director David F. Dixon, General Counsel Scott F. Field and
Agency Secretary June S. Greek.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None given.
AGFNCY BUSINFSS
1. Minutes
It was moved by Agency Member Stone, seconded by Agency Member Mufioz to
approve the minutes of January 25, 1994. The motion was unanimously carried.
Stinulated Judoment Effectino T~'necula Redevelooment Aoencv
Executive Director David Dixon presented the staff report.
Agency Member Mur~oz asked if under Item No. 4, if this would permit the City to use
RDA funds for incentives such as has been the case in the past. Mr. Dixon explained
that AB-1290 prohibits the transfer of sales tax revenues from · city's general funds
to Redevelopment Agencies.
It was moved by Agency Member Birdsall, seconded by Agency Member Roberts to
approve staff recommendation as follows:
2.1
Approve and authorize the City Attorney to execute the "Interim Stipulation"
in the case entitled Dawes v. Citv of Temecula, Riverside Superior Court Case
No. 194468MF (consolidated with 194948.)
The motion was unanimously carried.
Temecula Redevd0~meat Aien~ M'mates FebmaEf 8. 1994
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
Executive Director Dixon reported there has not yet been a response from the RTC regarding
the Rancho West Apartments and stated the Agency will be informed as soon as word is
received.
GENERAL COUNSEL'S RFPORT
None given.
Ar-ENCY MEMBFRS REPORTS
None given.
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Agency Member Mufioz, seconded by Agency Member Stone to adjourn st
11:26 PM to a meeting on February 22, 1994, 8:00 PM. The motion was unanimously
carried.
Ronald J. Parks, Chairparson
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk/Agency Secretary
ITEM
NO.
2
CITY I,D~AGER ,
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
AGENDA REPORT
Redevelopment Agency/Executive Director
Mary Jane McLarney, Finance Officer
February 22, 1994
Review and Approval of the Fiscal Year 1993-94 Mid-Year Budget
PREPARED BY: Luci Romero, Financial Services Administrator
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 94-
A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 1993-94
BUDGETS FOR THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
FUNDS
DISCUSSION: The Temecula Redevelopment Agency (RDA) Funds consist of
Low/Moderate Income Housing Fund; the Capital Projects (CIP), Fund and the Debt Service
Fund. The mid-year adjustments to these funds are explained below.
LOWIMOD SET ASIDI: FUND
The year-end revenue projection reflects an increase of $217,875. This increase is
primarily attributable to a revision of the 20% set aside from the tax increment
distribution; to an increase in investment interest; and to the one time Teeter Plan
Adjustment.
CIP FUND
The revised revenue projection reflects a year-end estimate of investment interest.
Expenditure adjustments are reflected in the Personnel Services and Operating
Expenditures. Increases in Personnel Services are due to a distribution of personnel
costs for City staff who are involved in redevelopment activities. Operating expenses
reflect increases for trustee administration fees for the bond issuance and legal
services. Further, as indicated in the City's General Fund activity, the Costco sales
tax reimbursement is now reflected in the Redevelopment Agency budget. A
significant decrease in expenditures is reflected in the transfer of the Educational
Revenue Augmentation (ERAF) payment to the Debt Service Fund.
Di::BT SERVIC;: FUND
The most significant change in this fund is reflected in the method of accounting for ~"
the tax increment distribution. The current budget projection represents the estimated
~net amount of increment to be received after pass through adjustments. However, the
gross amount of the tax increment distribution is now being reflected in the year-end
revenue projection. Correspondingly, the pass through adjustments are now reflected
in the expenditures in this fund. Thus the net revenue is the relatively unchanged. The .'
increase in net revenue is due to investment interest and the one time Teeter Ran
Adjustment.
Significant expenditure adjustments are as follows: 1 ) The costs required for Trustee
Admin Fees has been projected to year-end; 2) The Passthrough Agreements are
reflected in accordance with the discussion of revenues in this fund; and 3) The ERAF
payment is being more appropriately reflected in this fund, it was previously in the CIP
Fund. Additionally, the state has revised the required ERAF payment, resulting in an
increased expenditure of approximately $100,000.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The CIP Fund is projected to have a $1 1,594,983 fund balance at June 30, 1994. This
represents an increase of $245,651, over the original projection. The Debt Service Fund is
projected to have a $4,434,357 fund balance at June 30, 1994. This represents an increase
of $538,592, over the original projection.
Attachments: Resolution
Schedules A through C:
-LowlMod Set Aside Fund
-CIP Fund
-Debt Service Fund
2
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 94-
A RESOL~ON OF THE REDEVFJOPMENT AGENCY OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA ~ING THE FISCAL
YEAR 1993-94 BUDGETS FOR THE TEMECULA
ItEDEVELOP54ENT AGENCY FUNDS
W!:!F~REAS, each year a mid-year review is conducted of all Temecula Redevelopment
Agency (RDA) funds.
W].m~S, the purpose of this review is to conduct an analysis of revenues and
expenditures to ensure that the Temecula Redevelopment Agency maintains a prudent and
healthy fiscal position.
WI~REAS, the mid-year review has been completed and the recommended adjustments
are reflected in Schedules A through C of the RDA-Low/Moderate Set Aside Fund; the RDA-
CIP Fund; and the RDA-Debt Service Fund.
The Board of Directors does hereby resolve as follows:
~ion 1. That the Fiscal Year 1993-94 Budget for the RDA-Low/lVloderate Set Aside
Fund is amended in a~ordance with Schedules A through C.
Section 2. That the Fiscal Year 1993-94 Budget for the RDA-CIP Fund is amcndcd in
accordance with Schedules A through C.
Section 3. That the Fiscal Year 1993-94 Budget for the RDA-Debt Service Fund is
mended in accordance with Schedules A through C.
PASSH~, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 22nd day of February, 1994.
ATTEST:
Ronald I. Parks, Chairperson
lune S.' Greek, City Clerk/Agency Secretary
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMEC~)
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Board of
Directors of the Temecula Redevelopmeat Agency at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 22nd
day of February, 1994, by the following vote of the Board of Directors:
AGENCY lgi~MBERS:
NOES:
AGENCY ~ERS:
ABSENT: AGENCY MEMBERS:
June S. Greek, City Clerk/Agency Secretary
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
LOWAVlODERATE SET A~DE
BIJD~ET BUMMARY
SCHEDULE A
Revenue
Ex~endituree
Increue (decrease) in Fund Balanoe
Fund Balance, July 1,199~
Fund Balance, June 30. 1994
FYg~84 I:Yea-N FY9344 FY93-N
CUIIRENT YTD AMENDED VARIANCE
BUDGET BUDGET FAVIOJNFAV)
$ 1.304.325 S 73.150
1,522,200
405,000 10,413 405.000
89g.325 8 62,737 1.117,200
4,6~,Q8
$ 217,875
217,875
$ 217,875
22-Feb-94
-Tax Increment
-Investment Interest
-Property Tax Increment
-ONE TIME TEETER PLAN ADJ.
,A,~ ,.'.'.: :.',.:.
TEMECULA REDEVELOF~ENT AGENCY
LOWNOD SET ASIDE
REVENUE DETNL
BY FUND SOURCE
$CHEDULE B
FY 93-94 FY 93-94 FY 93-94 FY 93-94
CURRENT YTD REVISED ADJUSTMENT
BUDGET e 12/31/93 PROJECTION FAV/(UNFAV~
1,304,325 0 1,357,233 52,908
0 7,3,150 146,300 146,300
0 0 0 0
0 0 18,667 18,667
1,304,325 7'3,150 1,522,200 217,875
-Property Tax Admin Feee
-Other Outside Services
-Acquisition-Rancho West
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
LOW/MOD SET ASIDE
EXPENDITURES
SCHEDULE C
FY 93-94 FY 93-94 FY 93-94 FY 93-94
CURRENT YTD AMENDED ADJUSTMENT
BUDGET APPROPRIATION FAV/(UNFAV) ,
0 0 0 0
250,000 10,413 250,000 0
155,000 0 155,000 0
405,0(X) 10,413 405,000 0
TEMECULA FIEDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND
BUDGET BUMMARY
SCHEDULE A
Revenue
Expenditures
Excess of Revenuas Over Expenditures
Operating Transfers Out
Increase (decrease) in Fund Balance
Fund Balance, July 1. 1993
Fund Balance. June 30. 1994
FYg3..84 FYg3-g4 FY93-94
CUFIFIENT YTD AMENDED
BUDGET BUDGET
$ 239,039
1,945,098 453,737
(1,94S,O~e) (2'~4.69S)
1,891.597
(3,836,695)
13,294,430
11,349,332
$ (214.698)
418,318
2,117,765
(1,699,447)
1.891,597
(3,591.044)
13,294,430
11,594.983
FAV/(UNFAV)
418,318
(172,667)
245,651
22-Feb-94
-Investntent Interest
-Bond Proceeds
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
CIP FUND
REVENUE DETAIL
BY FUND SOURCE
SCHEDULE B
FYg3-94 FYlt3.-N FYg3-94 FYB3-N
CURRENT YTD REVISED ADJUSTMENT
BUDGET @ 12/31/93 PROJECTION FAV/(UNFAV)
0 239,039 418,318 418,318
0 0 0 0
0 239,039 418,318 418,318
Pemonnel Service
Operating Expenditures
CIP
OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
CIP FUND
EXPENDITURES
$CHEDULE C
FY 93-94 FY 93-94 FY 9~94 FY 93-94
CURRENT YTD AMENDED ADJUSTMENT
BUDGET @ 12/31/93 APPROPRIATION FAV/(UNFAV)
0 300 57,086 (57,086)
474,098 415,187 589,679 (115,581)
1,471,000 38,250 1,471,000 0
1,891,597 0 1,891,597 0
3,836,695 453,737 4,009,362 (172,667)
TEMECtJLA FIEDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
DEBT SERVICE FUND
BUDGETtY
SCHEDULE A
Revenue
Expenditures
Increase (decrease) in Fund Balenee
Fund Balance, July 1, 1993
Fund Balance, June 30, 1994
1,447,408
3,386,686
475,506
(414,646)
FY 93-94
AMENDED
BUDGET
$ 5.825,521 $
4,577.850
1,047,671
FYg3-94
VAillANCE
FAVI(UNFAV)
3,669,034
(3,'13o,442)
538,~92
$ 4,434,357 $ 538,592
-Tax Increment
-Investment Interest
-Bond ~s
-ONE qqME TEETER PLAN ADJ.
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
DEBT SERVICE FUND
REVENUE DETAIL
BY FUND 8OUI:ICE
8CHEDULEB
FY 93-N FY 93-94 FY 93-94 FY 93-94
CURRENT YTD REVISED ADJUSTMENT
BUDGET @ 12/31/93 PROJECTION FAV/(UNFAV)
1,956,487 0 5,428,933 3,472,446
0 60,960 121,920 121,920
0 0 0 0
0 0 74,668 74,668
1 ,g56,487 60,960 5,625,521 3,669,034
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
DEBT SERVICE FUND
EXPENDITURES
SCHEDULE C
-Trustee Admin Fees
-Property Tax Admin Fees
-Passthrough Agreements
-ERAF
-Debt Service-Principal
-Interest
FY 93-94 FY 93-94 FY 93-94 FY 93-94
CURRENT YTD AMENDED ADJUSTMENT
BUDGET @ 12/31/93 APPROPRIATION FAV/(UNFAV)
0 4,402 9,160 (9,160)
0 0 0 0
0 0 2,9/1,208 (2,971,208)
o o lso,crra (lso,o73)
505,000 0 505,000
942,408 471,204 942,408 0
1,447,408 475,606 4,577,850 (3, 130,442)