The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About112393 CC AgendaAGENDA TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL A REGULAR MEETING TEMECULA COMMUNITY CENTER - 28816 Pujol Street NOVEMBER 23, 1993 - 7:00 PM At approximately 9:45 PM, the City Council will determine which of the remaining agenda items can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00 PM and may continue all other items on which additional time is required until a future meeting. All meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 PM EXECUTIVE 'SESSIO'N:: ":'5:30' 'i~M '- ClOsed SesSion of 'the City council Pursuant to. Government Code Section 549'56.9(a) Pechanga Reservation v.. City'of Temecula and City of Temecula v. McDowell and 54956.9(b). .. · CALL TO ORDER: Invocation Flag Salute ROLL CALL: PRESENTATIONS/ PRESENTATIONS Next in Order: Ordinance: No. 93-19 Resolution: No. 93-94 Mayor J. Sal Mu~oz presiding Pastor Gary Ruly, HIS Church Christian Center Councilmember Birdsall Birdsall, Parks, Roberts, Stone, Mur~oz California Family Week Certificate of Appreciation - Dennis Chiniaeff Santa Margarita Watershed Presentation A4)ende/112393 I 11117/13 PUBLIC COMMENTS --~ A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Council on items that are not listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council about an item not listed on the Agenda or on the consent Calendar, a pink "Request To Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address. For all other agenda items a "Request To Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk before the Council gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made at this time. A total, not to exceed, ten (10) minutes will be devoted to these reports. CONSENT CALENDAR NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless members of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. Standard Ordinance Adootion Procedure RECOMMENDATION 1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. 2 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve the minutes of September 7, 1993; ,a~ende/112393 2 11117,13 3 Resolution ADorovina List of Demands RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 93- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A 4 Award of Contract for Puiol St. and First St. Street Widenine (Project No. PW92-09) RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Award a contract for the Pujol St. & First Street Widening, Project PW92-09, to IPS Services, Inc. for $73,393.31, and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract; 4.2 Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $7,339.33, which is equal to 10% of the contract amount. Completion and Acceotance of Sidewalk Imorovements on the south side of Rancho Vista Road between Mira Loma Drive and the Community Recreation Center, Project No. PW92-12 RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Accept the Sidewalk Improvements on the south side of Rancho Vista Road between Mira Loma Drive the Community Recreation Center, Project No. PW92-12, as complete and direct the City Clerk to: File the Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a one (1) year Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract; Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after the filing of the Notice of Completion if no liens have been filed. #Clods/112393 3 11 I17/83 7 8 9 10 A41enda/112393 "No Parking" Zone on Ynez Road North of Winchester Road RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 The Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 930 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING "NO PARKING" ZONE ON YNEZ ROAD FROM WINCHESTER ROAD TO A POINT 540' NORTH Travel Policy (Continued from the meeting of 11/09/93) RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 Continue to the meeting of 12/14/93. Pala Community Park PW93-03 CSD - Acceotance of Offer of Dedication - Temecula Lane and Loma Linda Road RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 93- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN OFFER OF DEDICATION FOR STREET AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES, BUT NOT ACCEPTING INTO THE CITY- MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM, PORTIONS OF LOMA LINDA ROAD AND TEMECULA LANE Final VestinQ Tract Mao No. 24135-3 RECOMMENDATION: 9.1 Approve Final Vesting Tract Map No. 24135-3 subject to the Conditions of Approval. Award of Bid for TCSD Vehicle RECOMMENDATION: 10.1 Award the purchase of the vehicle to Fuller Ford. The purchase price is $12,495, excluding tax. 4 11 I17,'92 11 Liability Insurance Renewal RECOMMENDATION: 11.1 Approve the renewal of the City's Municipal General, Automobile, and Public Officials Errors and Omissions Liability insurance policy with Insurance Company of the West in the amount of $103,000 annual premium. 12 Construction of Solana Way From Motor Car Parkway to Marqarita Road RECOMMENDATION: 12.1 Approve the construction plans and specifications and authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit construction bids for the full width widening of Solana Way including sidewalk on the southwest side from Motor Car Parkway easterly to Margarita Road. PUBLIC HEARINGS 13 Operational Policies. Regulations and Fee Schedule for Indoor Facility Public Use RECOMMENDATION: 13.1 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 93- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING PARK AND RECREATIONAL FACILITY OPERATIONAL POLICIES AND REGULATIONS, ESTABLISHING GENERAL OPERATION POLICIES GOVERNING SPECIAL USE PARKS, AND REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 91-37 13.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 93- RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A REVISED FEE SCHEDULE FOR THE USE OF CITY PARKS COUNCIL BUSINESS 14 ReQulation of Vehicle ParkinQ to Conform with Reouirements of the Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Prooram (AVA) RECOMMENDATION: 14.1 Staff will finalize the report and transmit under separate cover. A~tdl/112393 i 11117/13 16 17 18 19 Resolution Reauestina Consolidation with November Election in Odd Numbered Years RECOMMENDATION: 15.1 Adopt · resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 93- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA IN SUPPORT OF THE CONSOLIDATION OF ALL LOCAL, NON-PARTISAN ELECTIONS IN NOVEMBER OF ODD-NUMBERED YEARS Ordinance Establishing Prima Facie Soeed Limits on Certain Streets RECOMMENDATION: 16.1 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE 93- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, AMENDING SECTION 12.02.010 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS ON CERTAIN STREETS Construction of North General Kearnev Road Between Calle Madero and Nicolas Road RECOMMENDATION: 17.1 Review the alternatives proposed for the completion of North General Kearney Road between Calle Madero and Nicolas Road and provide direction to staff. Status Reoort on Detailed Imolementation Strategy and Reoional Air Quality Programs (Continued from the meeting of 11/09/93) RECOMMENDATION: 18.1 Review the attached material and direct staff to prepare specific implementation programs for the Council's consideration. Discussion of Investigation Into Alleaed Imorooer Conduct Directed at Members of the City Council (Placed on the agenda at the request of Mayor Mur~oz) /tende/112383 8 11117/13 DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS CITY MANAGER REPORT CITY ATTORNEY REPORT ADJOURNMENT Next meeting: Joint Meeting with the City of Murrieta, November 30, 1993, 7:00 PM, Murrieta City Council Chambers, 26442 Beckman Court, Murrieta, California. Next regular meeting: December 14, 1993, Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California. Agerole/112393 7 11 II 1/93 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING - (To be held at 8:00) CALL TO ORDER: ROLL CALL: PUBLIC COMMENT: President Patricia H. Birdsall DIRECTORS: Mur~oz, Parks, Roberts, Stone, Birdsall Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors, should present a completed pink "Request to Speak" to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address for the record. CONSENT CALENDAR I Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the minutes of October 26, 1993. PUBLIC HEARING 2 Citv's Parks and Recreation Master Plan RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. CSD 93- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ADOPTING THE PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN DEPARTMENTAL REPORT GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT - Dixon DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT - Nelson BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS 12393 I 11117/93 ADJOURNMENT: Next meeting: November 30, 1993, Immediately following Joint City Council Meeting, Murrieta City Council Chambers, 26442 Beckman Court, Murrieta, California. Next regular meeting: December 14, 1993, 8:00 PM, Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California 2393 9 11 I17/92 TEMECULA' REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING EXECUTIVE SESSION:': 5:30 PM - CloSed SesSiOn of the Temecula Redevelopment Agency pursuant to G0Vemment Code Section 54956.9(b). CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Ronald J. Parks presiding ROLL CALL: AGENCY MEMBERS: Birdsall, Roberrs, Stone," Parks Mur~oz, PUBLIC COMMENT: Anyone wishing to address the Agency, should present a completed pink "Request to Speak" to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address for the record. AGENCY BUSINESS Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the minutes of October 26, 1993. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT AGENCY MEMBER'S REPORTS ADJOURNMENT: Next meeting: November 30, 1993, Immediately following Joint City Council Meeting, Murrieta City Council Chambers, 26442 Beckman Court, Murrieta, California. Next regular meeting: December 14, 1993, 8:00 PM, Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California. Ageride/112303 10 11 I11/13 PRESENTATIONS\ PROCLAMATIONS The City of Temecula PROCLAMATION WHEREAS, the family has been the vehicle of survival and stability in every culture from ancient Egypt to present-day America; and WFIER~AS, individuals first find identity within the family circle, realize their relationship to others and to a Supreme Being, and discover there exists moral absolutes such as truth and honest, fight and wrong; and WHEREAS, the family group is the first unit of government, the primary place where individuals learn rules of conduct and infractions for disobedience; where respect, honor and wholesome standards of behavior are practiced, and where individuals learn to interact, communicate, acquire social skills and form and express personal views; and WHEREAS, to focus on family, give thanks for its existence and encourage wholesome family life, it has become traditional for the President and Congress of the United States to proclaim the week in which Thanksgiving Day falls as 'National Family Week*; NOW, THEREFORE, I J. Sat Mu~oz, on behalf of the City Council of the City of Temecula, hereby proclaim the week of November 21 through November 27, 1993 to be: "California Family Week" IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City of Tem~ula to be affixed this 23rd Day of November, 1993. J. S u~oz May Ju reek, City Clerk ITEM NO. ITEM NO. 2 MINUTES OF A SPECIAL MEETING OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL HELD SEPTEMBER 7, 1993 A regular meeting of the Temecula City Council was called to order at 5:36 PM at Temecula City Hall, 43174 Business Park Drive, Tamecula, California. Mayor J. Sal Mur~oz presiding. PRESENT 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Parks, Roberrs, Stone, Mu~oz ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None Also present were City Manager David F. Dixon, City Attorney Scott F. Field, and City Clerk June S. Greek. COUNCIL BUSINESS Consideration of a Zoning Moratorium on the Establishment. Construction and Develooment of Automobile Service Stations City Attorney Scott Field presented a staff report outlining the proposed urgency ordinance declaring a moratorium on the development, construction and use of automobile service stations, and explained that a 4/5ths vote is necessary to pass an urgency ordinance. Frances Bunt, 31448 Corte Montiel, spoke in opposition to placing a service station at the gateway corner of the City. Russell Rumansoff, 27349 Jefferson Avenue, Ste 206, representing the Temecula/Murrieta Economic Development Corporation Expediting Committee, stated the Expediting Committee is against a moratorium, and in the past there has been a desire for more service stations. Greg Treadway, 40550 Calla Modero, stated his main concern is with the traffic at the intersection of Rancho California Road and Ynez Road. Richard Kurtz, 43500 Ridge Park Drive, #201, representing the Temecula/Murrieta Economic Development Corporation Outreach Committee, spoke in opposition to the moratorium and spoke in favor of property owners' right to develop their property. Larry Markam, 41750 Winchester, Ste N, representing the applicant, voiced the applicant's opposition to the moratorium. He explained the applicant has gone through an extensive review process, with multiple modifications, and feels it would be unfair to be required to stop at this late date. Minutee~9%7~,93 - 1 - 09/09/93 City Council Minutes September 7, 1993 Donna Wilkenson, 42365 Agena, spoke against the placement of a service station at the corner of Rancho California Road and Ynez Road. Edward Anderson, 27431 Bolandra Court, representing Mr. and Mrs. Spears, the land owners of the property on which Chilis Restaurant is located, stated they are not against the development of the ARCO station, but they support any concern the management of Chili's might have. Arlene Bartz, 42081 Yea Beso Del Sol, objected that she was not aware of the project before it went to the Planning Commission and voiced her opposition to the Arco AM/PM station at this location. Sharron Gleason, 27740 Jefferson Avenue, #100, objected to the process by which this project was approved. Felicia Hogan, 30077 Mira Loma, spoke in opposition to the location of the Arco Station. Nick Voltaggio, 39813 Creative Drive, objected to the placement of a service station at the gateway corner of the City. Ida Sanchez, 41750 Winchester Road, stated she works for Markam and Associates and processed this application. She said every necessary step was followed, including proper notification and advertizement. Don Airhouse, 9405 Sawtooth Way, San Diego, representing ARCO, stated this service station will not be located on the corner of Rancho California Road and Ynez Road. He explained a large restaurant is planned for the corner and this structure will not be visible from Rancho California Road. He also stated Kemper contacted the owners of Chilis Restaurant and they support the project. Rebecca Weersing, 41775 Yorba Avenue, spoke in opposition to the project due to the location. Evelyn Buchanon, 31174 Riverton, spoke in opposition of the Arco Station at the approved location. David Wilson, 39605 Solana Way, spoke regarding the need to look at and plan the entire intersection prior to approving any development. Gordon Johnson, of the Californian, stated that the applicant did go through all the necessary advertising for approval of this project. Mayor Mu~oz asked why the owners of Chilis did not receive notice of this project. IVinutoe%9%7%93 -2- 09/09/93 City Coundl Minutes Sereember 7, 1993 Director of Planning Gary Thornhill answered that the City relies on the County Assessors rolls for noticing purposes and occasionally the lists provided by title companies are not as current as they should be. Councilmember Parks asked the zoning designation of this area. Mr. Thornhill stated it is CPS (Scenic Highway Commercial). Mayor Muf~oz spoke in favor of the moratorium, stating this would give the Council the opportunity to further examine the project. Mayor Pro Tam Robarts, stated he favors the moratorium, explaining he feels this is more a "quality of life" decision, rather than an economic decision. He listed his main concerns as the liquor license granted and noticing problems. Councilmember Parks listed his concern regarding noticing, however stated he is opposed to a moratorium on all gas stations. He stated he feels his greatest concerns have been mitigated through conditions placed on the project. Councilmember Birdsall stated she was informed of this matter in advance, by way of the Planning Commission packet, as were all members of the City Council. Councilmember Stone spoke in favor of the moratorium and stated he feels the approval policy of the City needs to be changed. He spoke specifically against the placement of a service station at the gateway of the City. City Attorney Field explained to the City Council the provisions of the proposed moratorium, stating it establishes a halt on a certain class of development so that it may be studied. He also explained that an applicant could receive an exemption from the moratorium through an appeal process, and reviewed the period of time a moratorium could be in effect. Councilmember Birdsall asked if any other gas stations are proposed at this time. Director of Planning Thornhill answered no other applications have been received. City Manager Dixon clarified the point that if the Council should deny an exemption from the moratorium, it would not be denying the project, only the moratorium. Councilmember Parks asked if there is any other method to review this project if the moratorium is not passed. City Attorney Field responded this is the only avenue by which further review of this project can occur. Minutes%9%7%93 -3- 09/09/93 CiW Council Minutes September 7, 1993 It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Roberts, seconded by Councilmember Stone to al~prove Urgency Ordinance No. 93- entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 93- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DECLARING A MORATORIUM ON THE DEVELOPMENT, CONSTRUCTION AND USE OF AUTOMOBILE SERVICE STATIONS. (URGENCY ORDINANCE) The motion failed to receive the required 4/5 support by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: 3 COUNCILMEMBERS: Roberts, Stone, Mur~oz 2 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Parks 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Mayor Pro Tern Roberts, seconded by Councilmember Parks to adjourn at 7:37 PM. The motion was unanimously carried. ATTEST: J. Sal Mu~toz, Mayor June S. Greek, City Clerk Minutes%9%7%93 -4- 09/09/93 ITEM NO. 3 RESOLIYrION NO. 93- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A have been audited by the City Manager, and that the same are hereby allowed in the mount of $1,430,189.95. Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 23rd day of November, 1993. ATTEST: J. Sai Mu~oz, Mayor June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] 5Xr~sos\93-87 1 STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMECULA) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby do certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 93- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 16th day of November, 1993 by the following roll call vote: AYES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None June S. Greek, City Clerk 5Xt'~sos\93-87 2 ' 11/04/93 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 11/10/93 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 11/23/93 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 11/04/93 TOTAL PAYROLL: CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS $752,972.13 $40,758.58 $530,084.25 $106,374.99 TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 11/23/93 COUNCIL MEETING: DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND: CHECKS: 001 1 O0 190 191 193 210 250 280 300 330 340 390 GENERAL GAS TAX TCSD TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ (CIP) TCSD4:;IP RDA-CIP SELF-INSURANCE VEHICLES INFORMATIONS SYSTEMS COPY CENTER FACILITIES TCSD DEBT SERVICE PAYROLL: 001 100 190 191 193 300 320 330 GENERAL (PAYROLL) GAS TAX (PAYROLL) TCSD (PAYROLL) TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A (PAYROLL) TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C (PAYROLL) SELF4NSURANCE (PAYROLL) INFORMATION SYSTEMS (PAYROLL) COPY CENTER (PAYROLL) TOTAL BY FUND: $723,737.84 $65,554.46 $61,379.54 $27,084.17 $25,972.88 $350,800.86 $5,521.17 $3,828.34 $3,402.89 $7,438.46 $8,729.43 $55,869.53 $2,861.34 $67,439.88 $17,437.41 $16,069.73 $465.97 $1,755.05 $542.11 $1,210.92 $1,453.92 $1,430,189.95 $1,323,814.96 $106,374.99 $1,430,1 89.95 PREPAR D BY KARM C;INTYRE F I,/._, ~, DIXON, CITY MANAGER ,HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. . HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOVVING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. VOUCHRE2 11/0~/93 11:21 CITY OF TENECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE 8 -'~,,, FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 100 GAS TAX FUND 190 CClIIJNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 280 REDEVELOPI4ENT AGENCY - CIP 300 INSURANCE FUND 310 VEHICLES FUND 320 INFORHATION SYSTEHS 330 COPY CENTER FUND :~0 FACILITIES TOTAL AHOUNT 662,401.67 14,314.67 '20,50~.77 3,141.16 1,720.92 2,~.67 1,153.48 2,783.62 2,885.91 6,971.43 752,972.13 VOUCHRE2 11/Of'''~ 11:21 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER 12563 11/0~/93 12564 11/04/93 12565 11/04/93 000116 12565 11/04/93 000116 12565 11/04/93 000116 12565 11/04/93 000116 12565 11/04/93 000116 12565 11/04/93 000116 12565 11/04/93 000116 12565 11/04/93 000116 12566 11/04/93 000131 12566 11/04/93 000131 12567 11/04/93 000135 12567 11/04/93 000135 12567 11/04/93 000135 12567 11/04/93 000135 000138 12569 11/04/93 000140 12569 11/04/93 000140 12569 11/04/93 000140 12569 11/04/93 000140 12569 11/04/93 000140 12569 11/04/93 000140 VENDOR NAME FIELDSTONE RANCHO CALIF PERHAM, NIKKI AVP VISION PLANS AVP VISION PLANS AVP VISION PLANS AVP VISION PLANS AVP VISION PLANS AVP VISION PLANS AVP VISION PLANS AVP VISION PLANS CARL WARREN & CO. CARL WARREN & CO. CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER CITICORP NORTH ARERICA CITICORP NORTH AMERICA COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN COLONIAL LIFE & ACC]DEN 12570 11/04/93 000155 DAVLIN 12571 11/04/93 000156 12571 11/04/93 000156 12571 11/04/93 000156 12572 11/04/93 000162 12572 11/04/93 000162 12572 11/04/93 000162 12573 11/04/93 000165 12574 11/04/93 000166 12573 11/04/93 000170 12575 11/04/93 000170 12575 11/04/93 000170 12575 11/04/93 000170 DENTICARE OF CALIFORNIA DENTICARE OF CALIFORNIA DENTICARE OF CALIFORNIA EGGHEAD DISCOUNT SOFTUA EGGHEAD DISCOUNT SOFTWA EGGHEAD DISCOUNT SOFTWA FEDERAL EXPRESS FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION OVERPAYMENT REFUND/FIEL TCSD REFUND/PERHAM, NIK NOVEMBER PREMIUM NOVEMIIER PREMIUM NOVE~ER PREMIUM NOVEI48ER PREMIUM NOVEMBER PREMIUM NOVEMBER PREMIOM NOVEMBER PREMIUM NOVEIIEER PREMIUM ALkERUD/3/21/93 BXGPONOI07/31193 W-37 "BUMP" 30" X 30" W-6 "15 MPH" TAX W-37 "BUMP" 30n X 30" NOV PYMT NOV PYMT NOVEMBER PREMIUM NOVEMBER PREMIUM NOVEMBER PREMIUM NOVEMBER PREMIUM NOVEMBER PREMIUM NOVEMBER PREMIUM VIDEO/AUDIO TAPE NOVEMBER PREMIUM NOVEMBER PREMIUM NOVEMBER PREMIUM 513812 WP INFORM UPGRAD FRE I GHT TAX NAIL/JG POLICY OF TITLE INSUP, AN 10368; ANILINE ZIPPER B 11191; MASTER FILLER FRE 1GHT TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-2660 190-183-4982 001-2310 100-2310 190-2310 191-2310 193-2310 300-2310 330-2310 O01 - 1180 300-199-999-5205 300-199-999-5205 100-164-999-52~, 100-164-999-5244 100-164-999-52/~, 100-164-999-52AJ, 320-2800 320-199-999-5391 001-2330 100-2330 190-2330 191-2330 193-2330 330-2330 001-100-999-5250 001-2340 100-2340 001-150-999-5250 320-199-999-5221 320-199-999-5221 320-199-999-5221 001-120-999-5230 190-180-999-5250 001-140-999-5220 001-140-999-5220 001-140-999-5220 001-140-999-5220 ITEM AMOUNT 101.24 39.00 421.39 127.32 97.15 4.14 5.06 3.94 31.50 24.95 116.00 595.78 42.73 213.52 19.86 109.26 1,102.57 325.00 130.75 9.75 132.00 11.48 14.02 45.00 701.67 29.86 14.93 15.00 272.00 8.50 21.08 13.50 422.50 80.00 30.00 9.50 9.26 PAGE 1 CHECK AMOUNT 101.24 39.00 715.45 711.78 385.37 1,427.57 3~3. O0 701.67 59.79 301.58 13.50 422.50 128.76 1252/"~1/04/93 000177 GLENN[ES OFFICE PRODUCT SUPPLIES 001-120-999-5220 37.83 VOUCHRE2 CiTY OF TENECULA 11/04/93 11: 21 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS PAGE 2 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NU14BER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER [TEN A14OUNT CHECK ANOUNT 12576 11104193 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT SUPPLIES 001-161-999-5220 12576 11/04/93 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5220 12576 11/04/93 000177 GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5220 12576 11/04/93 00O177 GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5220 12576 11/04/93 000177 GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5220 12576 11/04/93 000177 GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5220 12576 11/04/93 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT 141SC, OFFICE SUPPL]ES; 001-162-999-5220 12576 11/04/93 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5220 30.12 48.22 19.29 59.17 8.92 1.78 63.~J 2.22 271.48 12577 11/04/93 000194 [CNA RETZRE14ENT 000194 DEF CONP 001-2080 12577 11/04/93 000194 IC14A RETIRE14ENT 000194 DEF CONP 100-2080 12577 11/04/93 000194 lC14A RETIRE14ENT 000194 DEF CONP 190-2080 12577 11/04/93 000194 ICKA RETIRE14ENT 000194 DEF CONP 191-2080 12577 11/0/,/93 000194 ZClqA RETIRE14ENT 000194 DEF CONP 193-2080 12577 11/04/93 000194 ICNA RETIREMENT 000194 OEF CUMP 300-2080 12577 11/04/93 000194 ZCNA RETIREMENT 000194 OEF CONP 330-2080 2,166.01 564.16 496.96 34.09 41.65 25.36 50.00 3,378.23 12578 11/04/93 000201 JENNACO CLEANING TEEN CTR 190-181-~-5212 400.00 400.00 12579 11/04/93 000205 KIDS PARTIES, ETC. CARNAVAL GAME RENTALS 190-183-999-5370 45.00 45.00 12580 11/04/93 000206 KINKO'S COPIES PRINTING 001-161-999-5222 12580 11/04/93 O0020& KINKO'S COPIES PRINTING 190-180-999-5222 12581 11/04/93 00020~ L & 14 FERTILIZER SHEARS 190-180-~-5242 12581 11/04/93 00020~ L & 14 FERTILIZER SHOVEL 1~0-180-~-5242 12581 11/04/93 00020~ L & N FERTILIZER REPAIRS 1~0-180-~-5242 12581 11/04/93 00020~ L & 14 FERTILIZER PARTS & REPAIRS 190-180-~-5242 8.40 10.72 19.36 57.62 111.89 44.13 233.00 12582 11/04/93 000219 HARTIN 1-HOUR PHOTO PHOTO DEVELOPING AUTHOR 001-163-999-5250 86.97 86.97 12583 11/04/93 000224 14ELAD & ASSOCIATES PLAN CHECK FEES 001-162-~-5248 871,28 871.28 12584 11/04/93 000238 FINAL TOUCH HARKETING HARKET%NG PROGRAM CONTR 280-199-999-5264 2,66&.67 2,&&&.67 12585 11/04/93 000243 PAYLESS DRUG STORE FILl4 PROCESSING 1~0-180-~-5250 25.8~ 25.83 12586 11/0~/93 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR.PRE14 INS PRE141UM-NOV 1993 001-2090 12586 11/04/93 000245 PERS (HEALTH [NSUR.PRE14 INS PRE141UM-NOV 1993 100-2090 12586 11/04/93 000245 PERS (HEALTH [NSUR.PRE14 INS PREMIUM-NOV 1993 190-2090 12586 11/00/93 000245 PERS (HEALTH [NSUR.PRE14 INS PRE141UM-NOV 1993 191-2090 12586 11/04/93 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR.PREN INS PREMIUM-NOV 1993 193-2090 12586 11/00/93 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR.PREN iNS PRE141UM-NOV 1993 300-2090 12586 11/00/93 000245 PERS (HEALTH [NSUR.PREN INS PRE141UM-NOV 1993 330-2090 12586 11/00/93 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR.PREM/NS PREMIUM-NOV 1993 001-150-999-5250 13,658.09 3,674,27 3,721.68 135.95 469.74 143.88 725.04 116.05 22,6~.70 12587 11/04/93 000246 PERS E14PLOYEES' RETIRE14 000246 PER REDE 001-2130 12587 11/04/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE14 000246 PER REDE 100-2130 12587 11/00/93 000246 PERS E14PLOYEES' RETIREN 000246 PERS RET 001-2390 12587 11/00/93 000246 PER$ EMPLOYEES' RETIREN 000246 PERS RET 12587 11/00/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIRE14 000246 PERS RET 190-2390 107.35 107.35 11,350.09 2,532.71 2,323.08 VOUCHRE2 11/0/'~ 11:21 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER 12587 11/()4/93 000246 12587 11/04/93 000246 12587 11/04/93 000246 12587 11/04/93 000246 12587 11/04/93 000246 12587 11/04/93 000246 12587 11/04/93 000246 12587 11/04/93 000246 12587 11/04/93 000246 12587 11/0/,/93 000246 12587 11/0~/93 000246 12587 11/0~/93 000266 12587 11/04/93 000266 12588 11/04/93 000248 12589 11/04/93 000249 12589 11/04/93 000269 12589 11/04/93 000249 12589 11/04/93 000249 12589 11/04/93 000269 1/04/93 000269 12L~ 11/04/93 000249 12589 11/04/93 000249 12589 11/06/93 000249 12589 11/04/93 000249 12589 11/06/93 000249 12589 11/04/93 000249 12589 11/04/93 000249 12589 11/04/93 000249 12590 11/04/93 000266 12591 11/04/93 000278 12592 11/04/93 000283 12592 11/0~/93 000283 12592 11/0~/93 000283 12592 11/04/93 000283 12592 11/04/93 000283 12592 11/0/,/93 000283 12592 11/04/93 000283 12592 11/04/93 000283 12592 11/04/93 000283 12592 11/04/93 000283 12592 11/04/93 000283 12592 11/04/93 000283 12592 11/04/93 000283 12592 11/04/93 000283 125r""tl/04/93 000283 VENDOR NAME PERS EMPLOYEES' RET/REM PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM PERS EMPLOYEES' RETZREM PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM PETROLANE PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH RIGHTHAY SAN DIEGO UNION TRIBUNE FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (1RS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (iRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX(IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION 0002~6 PER$ RET 000246 PERS RET 0002~6 PERS RET 0002~6 PERS RET 000246 PERS RET 000246 SURVIVOR 000266 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 0002~6 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 0002~6 SURVIVOR FUEL CiTY PETTY CASH CITY PETTY CASH CITY PETTY CASH CITY PETTY CASH CiTY PETTY CASH CITY PETTY CASH CITY PETTY CASH CITY PETTY CASH CITY PETTY CASH C%TY PETTY CASH CITY PETTY CASH CITY PETTY CASH TCSD PETTY CASH CITY PETTY CASH CITY PETTY CASH PORTABLE TOILETS TRAFFIC TECH AD 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 NEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 NED I CARE 000283 MED Z CARE 000283 NED l CARE 00028~ MEDZCARE 00028~ MEDICARE ACCOUNT NUMBER 191-2390 193-2390 300-2390 320-2390 330-2390 001-2390 100-2390 190-2390 191-2390 193-2390 300-2390 320-2390 330-23~0 100-164-~99-5263 001-2172 001-140-~-5260 001-162-~99-5220 001-163-999-5220 001-161-999-5260 001-150-999-5260 320-199-999-5220 001-2172 001-161-999-5230 001-161-999-5220 001-150-999-5262 001-150-999-5265 320-199-~-5242 001-162-999-5220 001-163-999-5220 190-180-999-5238 001-150-999-5254 001-2070 100-2070 190-2070 191-2070 193-2070 300-2070 320-2070 330-2070 001-2070 100-2070 190-2070 191-2070 193-2070 300-2070 320-2070 ITEM AMOUNT 87.76 293.81 94.20 232.35 226.87 59.16 11.62 12.09 .42 1.z~ .93 1.86 3.56 61.00 20.00 23.53 8.62 19.29 10.00 4.31 ~4.50 38.95 15.07 22.40 62.44 49.04 9.~6 4.31 140.49 208.84 10,286.73 2,995.72 2,232.32 268.17 8~.25 247.11 7~.~5 2,397.66 632.72 553.~) 17.65 62.01 19.24 45.02 PAGE 3 CHECK AMOUNT 17,443.55 3.56 372.92 140.49 208.84 VOUCHRE2 11/04/93 VOUCHER/ CHECK NLNBER 12592 12593 12593 12594 12595 12596 12596 12597 12597 12597 12597 12597 12597 12598 12598 12598 12599 12600 12601 12602 12603 12603 12603 12603 12603 12603 12604 12605 12605 12605 12606 12606 12606 12606 12606 12606 12606 11:21 CHECK DATE 11/04/93 11/04/93 11/06/93 11/04/93 11/04/93 11/04/93 11/04/93 11/0~/93 11104,193 11/04/9~ 11/0~/93 11/06/9'~ 11104193 11/04/93 11/04/93 11/04/93 11/06/93 11/06/93 11/04/93 11/06/93 11/06/93 11/06/93 11/06/93 11/04/93 11/04/93 11/04/93 11/04/93 11/04/93 11/06/93 11/04/93 11104193 11104193 11104193 11104193 11 ~04~93 11104193 11104193 VENDOR NUMBER 000283 000285 000285 000291 000305 000325 000325 000326 000326 000326 000326 000326 000326 000~.0 000360 000360 000~,2 000345 000~.8 00036~ 000374 000376 000376 000376 000374 000374 000375 000389 000389 000389 000406 000406 000406 000406 000406 000406 000406 VENDOR NAME FIRSTAX (IRS) SIR SPEEDY SIR SPEEDY SPEE DEE OIL CHANGE & T TARGET STORE UNITED MAY OF THE INLAN UNITED MAY OF THE INLAN UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE ~HITE CAP ~HITE CAP WHITE CAP WINDSOR PARTNERS - RANC XEROX CORPORATION BILLI ZIGLER, GAIL GREEK, JUNE S, SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON USCN/PEBSCO, (OBRA) USCN/PEBSCO, COBRA) USCH/PEBSCO, (ORRA) RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION 000283 MEDICARE 1000 EA. ,5" X 1.5" STI TAX REPAIR & NAINT. CITY VE RECREATION SUPPLIES 000325 tN 000325 UNIFORMS 2 SETS OF UNIFORMS CLEA 2 SETS OF UNIFORMS CLEA RENTAL RENTAL FLOOR MAT SERVICES; CIT TOOLS TAX ttGOOF OFF" GRAFFITI REM NOVEMBER RENT LEASE AGREEMENT; 5100 C THREE SPECIAL DESSERTS REIMB FOR LEAGUE MEETIN 09/27-10/26/93 9/27-10/26 9/27-10/26 9/27-10/26 9/27-10/26 9/27-10/26 909-202-4752 SN 000389 PT RETIR 000389 PT RET[R 000389 PT RETIR LAW ENFORCEMENT/APRIL LAW ENFORCEMENT/APRIL LAW ENFORCEMENT/APRIL LAW ENFORCEMENT/APRIL LAW ENFORCEMENT/APRIL LAW ENFORCEMENT/APRIL LAW ENFORCEMENT/APRIL ACCOUNT NUMBER 330-2070 001-150-999-5220 001-150-999-5220 310-164-999-5214 190-182-999-5301 001-2120 190-2120 190-180-999-524~ 100-164-999-5263 100-16~-999-5243 190-180-999-5243 190-180-999-5263 360-199-999-5250 100-164-999-5262 100-164-999-5242 100-164-999-5242 3~0-199-999-5234 330-199-999-5239 190-180-999-5301 001-120-999-5258 3~0-199-999-5240 191-180-999-5260 191-180-999-5319 190-180-999-5240 190-182-999-5260 193-180-999-5240 190-180-999-5208 001-2160 100-2160 190-2160 001-170-999-5288 001-170-999-5299 001-170-999-5298 001-170-999-5290 001-170-999-5291 001-170-999-5281 OO1-170-999-5282 ITEM ANOLINT 46.16 67.00 3.65 127.96 87.0O 17.50 156.02 23.00 23.00 16.10 16.10 34.50 270.56 20.97 19.27 29,798.92 2,969.95 95.00 98.58 4,594.41 407.94 2,288.75 4,049.86 419.70 432,03 92.51 23.78 185.58 176.26 217,751.40 21,902.48 20,183.39 4,962.64 4,378.80 15,625.52 2,865.60 PAGE CHECK AMOUNT 20,067.42 50.65 76.79 127.96 106.50 2,969.95 95.00 98 · 58 12,192.69 92.51 385.62 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TENECULA 11/Qt"" 11:21 VOUCHER/CHECK REG]STER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 12606 11/04/9~ 000406 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERZF LAW ENFORCEMENT/APRIL 001-170-999-5262 12606 11/0~/93 000/,06 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF LAW ENFORCEMENT NAY 001-170-999-5288 12606 11/04/93 000/,06 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF LAW ENFORCEMENT NAY 001-170-999-5299 12606 11/04/93 000/,06 RIVERSIDE COUNTY $HERIF LAW ENFORCEMENT NAY 001-170-999-5298 12606 11/04/93 000406 RIVERS]DE COUNTY SHERIF LAW ENFORCEMENT NAY 001-170-999-5290 12606 11/04/93 0001,06 RIVERS/DE COUNTY SHER]F LAW ENFORCEMENT NAY 001-170-999-5262 12606 11/04/93 000606 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHER]F LAW ENFORCEMENT NAY 001-170-999-5281 12606 11/04/93 000/,06 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF LAW ENFORCEMENT NAY 001-1230 12606 11/04/93 000406 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERZF LAW ENFORCEMENT NAY 001-170-999-5282 12606 11/04/93 000406 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF LAW ENFORCEMENT NAY 001-170-999-5291 16,767.54 211,855.56 18,750.82 20,565.41 5,838.40 17,270.64 15,273.30 2,919.20 2,865.60 2,919.20 602,695.50 12607 11/04/93 000~08 AGRICRED[T ACCEPTANCE C TRACTOR LEASE - TC$O (4 190-180-999-5239 8~6.02 846.02 12608 11/04/93 O00~Z] H & H CRAFT & FLORAL SU RECREATION SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5301 12608 11/04/93 00042] H & H CRAFT & FLORAL SU RECREATION SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5301 12608 11/04/93 000423 H & H CRAFT & FLORAL SU RECREATION SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5301 24.62 38.06 62.28 124.96 12609 11/04/93 000/,31 NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH, INS PREMIUM - NOV 1993 001-23Z,0 12&09 11/04/93 000/,31 NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH, ]MS PREM]UM- NOV 1993 100-23~0 12609 11/04/93 000431 NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH, INS PREMXUM - NOV 1993 190-2~0 12609 11/04/93 000~31 NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH, INS PREMIUM - NOV 1993 191-2340 000~31 RATIONAL DENTAL H~LTH~ XNS PREMX~ - NOV 1~3 300-~0 126~ -41/~/93 00~1 ~TK~AL DENTAL HEALTH, iNS PRENK~ - NOV 1~3 330-~0 12609 11/~/9~ 00~31 NATI~AL DENTAL H~LTH, iNS PREN[~ - NOV 1~ 001-11~ 12609 11/~/~ 00~31 NATX~AL DENTAL H~LTH, INS PRENI~ - NOV 1~3 001-150-~-5250 605.33 130.00 7.31 8.94 4.06 32.50 48.75 15.00 1,006.25 12610 11/04/93 00044/, FIRSTAX CEDD) 000~4 SDi 001-2070 12610 11/04/93 0004/~ FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 100-2070 12610 11/04/93 0004/,4 FIRSTAX (EDD) O00Z~/~ SDI 190-2070 12610 11/04/93 0004~ FIRSTAX (EDD) 0004~, $DI 191-2070 12610 11/04/93 00042~ FIRSTAX (EDD) 0004/~ SDI 193-2070 12610 11/G6/93 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 00044~ $DI 300-2070 12610 11/02,/93 0002~4 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000~ $DI 320-2070 12610 11/04/93 O004J~ FIRSTAX (EDD) OOO~ $DI 330-2070 12610 11/04/93 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) O00Z~ STATE 001-2070 12610 11/04/93 001)/.~ FIRSTAX (EDD) O00Z~, STATE 100-2070 12610 11/04/93 0004~, FIRSTAX (EDD) 000,~ STATE 190-2070 12610 11/04/93 O00z~ FIRSTAX (EDD) 000~ STATE 191-2070 12610 11/04/93 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 0002~4 STATE 193-2070 12610 11/04/93 000~4~ FIRSTAX (EOD) 0004~4 STATE 300-2070 12610 11/04/93 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 320-2070 12610 11/04/93 0004~4 FIRSTAX (EDD) 0002~4 STATE 330-2070 12611 . 11/04/93 000/,59 TUMBLE JUMBLE PAYMENT FOR CONTRACT CL 190-183-~9~-5330 528.96 120.93 163.77 7.92 27.79 2.81 15.52 20.69 2,551 737.86 26.47 56.03 25.56 56.45 13.98 618.40 4,8L~.08 618.40 12612 11/06/93 000471 IGOE & CUMPANY FLEX PLAN ~DMIN FEES OC 001-150-999-5250 266.50 266.50 12613 11104193 000525 PARKS, RONALD J. LAKE TAHOE/JUNE 2-4/RP 001-100-999-5258 12613 11/04/93 000525 PARKS, RONALD J. REIME LEAGUE OF CC MTG/001-100-999-5258 126Y""'1/04/93 000525 PARKS, RONALD J. LEAGUE/OCT 11-13/RP 001-100-999-5258 11.82 12.65 12.38- VOUCHRE2 PAGE 6 11/0~/93 11:21 ~ CITY OF TENECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER VENDOR NAME ZTEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 12614 11/04/93 000558 12614 11/04/93 000558 12615 11/04/93 000596 ADVANCED MOBILECOlel ADVANCED NORILECONN LEAGUE OF CA CITIES/LAF MONTHLY ELSINORE BASE U 25978 INVOICE ADJUSTMEN EMPLOYEE RELATIONS UORK 320-199-999-5209 320-199-999-5209 001-150-999-5261 236.25 75.00- 380.00 161.25 380.00 12616 11/04/93 0006~2 12616 11/04/93 000642 12616 11/06/93 000642 12616 11/04/93 000642 12616 11/04/93 000642 CITY OF TEMEOULA - FLEX CITY OF TEMECULA - FLEX CITY OF TEMECULA - FLEX CITY OF TEMECULA - FLEX CITY OF TENECULA - FLEX FLEX BENEFIT/11/O~/93 FLEX BENEFIT/11/04/93 FLEX BENEFIT/11/O~/93 FLEX BENEFIT/Ill04/93 FLEX BENEFIT/Ill04/93 001-1020 190-1020 100-1020 300-1020 330-1020 3,050.71 516.66 50.00 21.25 16.25 3,654.87 12617 11/0~/93 000645 SMART & FINAL 12617 11/06/93 000645 SItART & FINAL RECREAT]OR SUPPLIES RECREAT]ORAL SUPPLIES 190-182-999-5301 190-180-999-5301 90.02 ~.64 173.66 12618 11/06/93 0006~9 NUNOZ, SAL J. REIMB LEAGUE OF CC MTG/001-100-999-5258 97.86 97.86 12619 11/06/93 000680 AMS-TMS 12619 11/06/93 000680 AMS-TMS 12619 11/04/93 000680 AMS-TMS 12619 11/06/93 000680 AMS-TMS 12619 11/04/93 000680 AMS-TMS 12619 11/0~/93 000680 AMS-TMS 12619 11/04/93 000680 AMS-TMS 12619 11/0~/93 000680 AMS-TMS 12619 11/0/,/93 000680 AMS-TMS 12620 11/06/93 000696 BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA POSTAGE RE/MB. POSTAGE REIMB. POSTAGE REIMB. POSTAGE REIMB. POSTAGE REIMB. POSTAGE REIMB. POSTAGE REINIi. POSTAGE REINB. POSTAGE REIMB. 001-100-999-5230 001-110-999-5230 001-120-999-5230 001-140-999-5230 001-150-999-5230 001-161-999-5230 001-162-999-5230 001-163-999-5230 190-180-999-5230 GENERAL LIABILITY/EXPLO 001-170-999:5235 5.44 255.61 144.63 :~.7.85 39.8~ 216.07 82.16 229.01 228,71 99.00 1,569.31 99.00 12621 11/04/93 000730 EDVALSON, HARgO00 LEAGUE/OCT 16-19/HE 001-110-999-5258 627.98 627.98 12622 11/06/93 000752 STONE, JEFFREY E. LEAGUE/OCT 16-19 001-100-999-5258 715.81 715.81 12623 11/0~/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA 12623 11/06/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA 12623 11/04/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA 12623 11/0~/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA 12623 11/06/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA 12623 11/06/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA 12623 11/06/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA 12623 11/06/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA 12623 11/04/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA 12623 11/0~/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA 12623 11/0~/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA 12623 11/06/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA 12623 11/06/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA 12623 11/0~/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA 12623 11/0/,/93 000765 GROUP AMER I CA 12623 11/0/,/93 000765 GROUP AMER I CA 12623 11/04/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA 12623 11/04/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA 12623 11/04/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA INS PREMIUM - NOV 1993 INS PREMIUM - NOV 1993 INS PREMIUM - NOV 1993 INS PREMIUM - NOV 1993 INS PREMIUM - NOV 1993 INS PREMIUM - NOV 1993 INS PREMIUM - NOV 1993 INS PREMIUM - NOV 1993 INS PREMIUM - NOV 1993 INS PREMIUM - NOV 1993 INS PREMIUM - NOV 1993 INS PREMIUM - NOV 1993 INS PREMIUM - NOV 1993 INS PREMIUM - NOV 1993 INS PREMIUM - NOV 1993 INS PREMIUM - NOV 1993 INS PREMIUM - NOV 1993 INS PREMIUM - NOV 1993 INS PREMIUM - NOV 1993 001-2360 100-2360 190-2360 191-2360 193-2360 300-2360 320- 2360 330 - 2360 001-2380 100-2380 190-2.380 191-2380 193-2380 300- 2380 320 - 2380 330-2380 001-2500 100-2500 190-2500 570.00 118.75 133.00 6.28 16.72 4.75 9.50 19.00 932.78 216.99 196.67 5.89 20.91 7.76 18.67 18.59 202.01 66.86 62,82 VOUCHRE2 11/0/''~ VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 12623 12623 12623 12623 12623 12624 12625 12626 12626 12626 12626 12627 12627 12627 12628 12628 1 12629 12630 12630 12630 12631 12631 12631 12632 12632 12632 12633 12634 12635 11:21 CHECK DATE 11/04/93 11/04/93 11/04/93 11/04/93 11/04/93 11/04/93 11/0~/93 11/04/93 11/04/93 11/04/93 11/04/93 11/04/93 11/0~/93 11/04/93 11/04/93 11/04/93 11/04/93 11/04/93 11/04/93 11/04/93 11/04/93 11/04/93 11/04/93 11/04/93 11/04/93 11/04/93 11/04/93 11/0~/93 11/04/93 11104193 11/04/93 11/04/93 VENDOR NUMBER 000765 000765 000765 000765 000765 000919 000960 000992 000992 000992 000992 001006 001006 001006 001065 001065 001065 001065 001065 001120 001123 001123 001123 00116~ 001164 001164 001178 001178 001178 001198 001208 001212 VENDOR NAME GROUP AMERICA GROUP AMERICA GROUP AMERICA GROUP AMERICA GROUP AMERICA TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED ASSOCIAT[OR OF RECORDS RANONA TIRE RANONA T ! RE RAMONA T I RE RANONA T ] RE BURTRONICS BUSINESS SYS BURTRONICS BUSINESS SYS BURTRONICS BUSINESS SYS USCM/PEBSCO (DEF. COMP. USCN/PEBSCO (DEF. CONP. USCN/PEBSCO (DEF. COMP, USC:X/PEBSCO (DEF, CONP, USCN/PEBSCO (DEF. COMP, ESOY, VITO P. JR. KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIE KNOX INDUSTRIAL $UPPLIE KNOX ]NDUSTRIAL SUPPLIE GABRIEL, RICHARD GABRIEL, RICHARD GABRIEL, RICHARD CMS BUSINESS FORMS CNS BUSINESS FORMS CNS BUS[MESS FORMS WHITE HOUSE SEPTIC TANK CRAFTSMEN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS C%TY OF TENECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION INS PREMIUM - NOV 1993 INS PREMIUM - NOV 1993 INS PREMIUM - NOV 1993 ]MS PREMIUM - NOV 1993 INS PREMIUM - NOV 1993 SUPPLIES/DAY CANP RECORDS & INFO NSMT SEN TIRE SERVICES CITY VEHI TIRE SERVICES CITY VEHI TIRE SERVICES CITY VEN] TIRE SERVICES CITY VEHI CRED]T/CUTTER STAND NA/NTENANCE AGREEMENT;E MAINTENANCE 001065 DEF CONP 001065 DEF CONP 001065 DEF CUMP 001065 DEF CONP 001065 DEF CUMP STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING 560-2999 MANURE FORK 524-8001 GFCZ SAFETY CO TAX LEASE AGREEMENT WITH/C] LEASE AGREEMENT WITH/C] LEASE AGREEMENT WITH/CI SELF MAILERS; BUSINESS FREIGHT TAX PUMP SEWAGE PUMP TANKS 17-8274-036-1451-1 10/2 ACCOUNT NUMBER 191-2500 193-2500 300-2500 320-2500 330-2500 190-180-999-5301 001-120-999-5260 310-162-999-5214 310-162-999-5214 310-162-999-5214 310-162-999-5214 330-199-999-5220 330-199-999-5217 330-199-999-5217 001-2080 100-2080 190-2080 300-2080 320-2080 100-164-999-5248 100-164-999-5218 100-164-999-5218 100-164-999-5218 310-164-999-5234 310-180-999-5234 310-162-999-5234 001-140-999-5220 001-140-999-5220 001-140-999-5220 190-180-999-5250 190-181-999-5212 190-181-999-5240 ITEM AMOUNT 1.30 4.60 1.71 4.11 4,09 120.97 99.00 128.75 40.00- 50.98- 569.06 150.00- 1,695.00 1,125.00 3,365.75 147.98 256.32 3.47 312.50 800.00 248.20 49.79 23.09 1,050.00 735.00 315.00 737.25 26.80 57.14 132.50 145.00 12.30 PAGE 7 CHECK AMOUNT 2,595.76 120.97 99.00 606.83 2,670.00 4,086.00 800.00 321.08 2,100.00 821.19 132.50 165.00 12.30 TOTAL CHECKS 752,972.13 VOUCHRE2 11/10/~:3 15:23 CITY OF TEHECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE 5 FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 100 GAS TAX FUND 190 COleeJNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 210 CAPITAL INPROVENENT PROJ,FUND 280 REDEVELOPNENT AGENCY - CIP 310 VEHICLES FUND ]20 ]NFORHATIOR SYSTENS TOTAL AHOUNT 6,598.83 1,293.13 15,632.29 692.89 273.88 21.00 619.27 6,552.55 60,758.58 VOUCHRE2 11/10'/~' 15:23 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE 12559 11/03/93 12636 11/04/93 12640 11/10/93 12641 11/10/93 12642 11/10/93 VENDOR NUHBER 0001~4 000612 12643 11/10/93 000100 12643 11/10/93 000100 12643 11/10/93 000100 12644 11/10/9] 000105 12645 11/10/93 000112 12645 11/10/93 000112 12645 11/10/93 000112 12645 11/10/93 000112 1264~a...._11/10/93 000122 126, 1/10/93 000122 1264~ ,1/10/93 000122 12646 11/10/93 000122 12646 11/10/93 000122 12647 11/10/93 000146 VENDOR NAME COSTCO tJHOLESALE TJENTZ, ED ITEM DESCRIPT/OR BIKE SAFETY POSTER CONT DEPOSIT/MUSICIANS FOR C PERUCHETTI, MICHAEL REFUND/PERUCHETTI, MICH OLSON, LAURETTA REINB/OLSON FABRIC ATLANTIC RICHFIELD CONP REFUND/ATLANTIC RICHFIE ALLIED BARRICADE CONPAN ALLIED BARRICADE COIqPAN ALLIED BARRICADE CONPAN TENSION SPRINGS (50127) RING SPACERS (50102) TAX SECURITY, INC. TEEN CENTER ALARM SERVI AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOC AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOC AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOC AMERICAN PLANNING ASSIX: MEMBERSHIP 1/94-12/94 MEMBERSHIP 1/94-12/94 MEMBERSHIP 1/94-12/W, MEMBERSHIP 1/94-12/9~ ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-2270 001-100-999-5265 190-180-4107 210-199-801-580~ 001-2660 100-164-999-5218 100-164-999-5218 100-164-999-5218 190-180-999-5250 001-161-999-5226 001-161-999-5226 001-161-999-5226 001-161-999-5226 BSN SPORTS ~32XXXXX CLAHP & NET 190-180-999-5301 BSN SPORTS NAFIXXXX DELUXE PADDLE 190-180-999-5301 BSN SPORTS NA8106BX 190-180-999-5301 BSN SPORTS FREIGHT 190-180-999-5301 BSN SPORTS TAX 190-180-999-5301 COUNTS UNLIMITED TRAFFIC CENSUS PROGRAM AUDIO TAPE PLANNING NTG 12648 11/10/9] 000155 DAVLIN OVERNIGHT FLAIL FEDERAL EXPRESS TEMECULA FLOMER CORRAL FLOMERS/SUNSHINE FUND OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES M]SC. OFFICE SUPPLIES GLENNIES OFFICE PROOUCT GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT 12649 11/10/93 000165 GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO INTERNAL SCSI CO RON HI GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO 8BIT SCSI INTERFACE CAR GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO FREIGHT GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO TAX 12650 11/10/9] 000168 12651 11/10/93 000177 12651 11/10/93 000177 12651 11/10/93 000177 12651 11/10/93 000177 12652 11/10/93 000178 12652 11/10/9] 000178 12652 11/10/93 000178 12652 11/10/93 000178 12653 11/10/93 000184 GTE 12653 11/10/93 000184 GTE 1265] 11/10/93 000184 GTE 12653 11/10/93 000184 GTE 909-695-3539 OCT 1993 909-699-0128 OCT 1993 9C)9-699-2309 OCTOBER 19 909-694-1989 OCT 1993 100-164-999-5406 001-161-999-5250 001-162-999-5230 001-2170 190-180-999-5220 190-180-999-5220 001-140-999-5220 001-140-999-5220 320-199-999-5221 320-199-999-5221 320-199-999-5221 320-199-999-5221 320-199-999-5208 320-199-999-5208 320-199-999-5208 320-199-999-5208 ITEM AMOUNT 284.40 50.00 266.25 2~ .88 532.73 8.00 48.00 4.34 105.00 15.00 194.00 138.00 129.00 84.00 45.00 48.00 17.70 13.72 600.00 150.00 23.97 87.82 56.99 34.42 19.54 26.40 350.00 60.00 4.00 31.77 25.85 905.63 23.21 2,108.70 CHECK AMOUNT 284.40 50.00 266.25 273.88 532.73 60.34 105.00 476. O0 208.42 600.00 150.00 23.97 87.82 137.35 ~5.77 3,063.39 1265r-'-1/10/93 000186 HANKS HARDgARE RECREATIONAL SUPPL]ES 190-180-999-5301 11.16 VOUCHRE2 11/10/93 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 12654 12654 12654 12654 12655 12655 12656 12656 12656 12656 12656 12657 12657 12657 12658 12658 12658 12658 12658 12658 12658 12658 12658 12658 12658 12658 12658 12658 12658 12658 12659 12660 12660 12660 12660 12661 12662 12663 1266S 12663 12663 12663 15:23 CHECK DATE 11/10/93 11/10/93 11/10/93 11/10/93 11/10/93 11/10/93 11/10/93 11/10/93 11/10/93 11/10/93 11/10/93 11/10/93 11/10/93 11/10/93 11/10/93 11/10/93 11/10/93 11/10/93 11/10/93 11/10/93 11/10/9'5 11/10/93 11/10/93 11/10/93 11/10/93 11/10/93 11/10/93 11/10/9~ 11/10/93 11/10/93 11/10/93 11/10/93 11/10/93 11/10/93 11/10/93 11/10/93 11/10/93 11/10/93 11/10/93 11/10/93 11/10/93 11/10/93 VENDOR NUMBER 000186 000186 000186 000186 000214 000214 000241 000241 000241 000241 000241 0002~8 00021,8 000248 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000255 000282 000282 000282 000282 000291 000306 000319 000319 000319 000319 00O319 VENDOR NAME HANKS HARDMARE HANKS HARDMARE HANKS HARDMARE HANKS HARDHARE LUNCH & STUFF CATERING LUNCH & STUFF CATERING ORANGE SPORTING GOODS ORANGE SPORTING GOODS ORANGE SPORTING GOODS ORANGE SPORTING GOODS ORANGE SPORTING GOODS PETROLANE PETROLANE PETROLAHE PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PRO LOCK & KEY SCMAF SCNAF SCNAF SCMAF SPEE DEE OIL CHANGE & T TEMECULA VALLEY PIPE TONARK SPORTS, INC. TOIqARK SPORTSe INC. TONARK SPORTS, INC. TDNARK SPORTS~ INC. TONARK SPORTS~ INC. CITY OF TENECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REG]STER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION MISC. TOOLS & SUPPLIES HARDgARE SUPPLIES HARDMARE SUPPLIES SPORTS PROGRAM HARDgARD COUNCIL MEETING REFRESH COUNCIL MTG REFRESHMENT DEBEER TC12 SOFTBALLS TAX DE BEER TC-12 SOFTBALL FREIGHT TAX FUEL PETROLANE GAS FUEL CITY PETTY CASH CITY PETTY CASH CITY PETTY CASH CITY PETTY CASH CITY PETTY CASH CITY PETTY CASH CITY PETTY CASH CITY PETTY CASH CITY PETTY CASH PETTY CASH/CITY PETTY CASH/CITY PETTY CASH/CITY PETTY CASH/CITY PETTY CASH/CITY PETTY CASH/CITY PETTY CASH/CITY REKEY SENIOR CENTER MEMBERSHIP 1994/SN MEMBERSHIP DUES/PARKER MEMBERSHIP DUES/NC GAVR 1994 MEMBERSHIP DUES/JO OIL CHANGE/PU MISC HARDWARE SUPPLIES 10500 HEAVY DUTY DRAG M 10992 HEAVY ALUMINUM BA 11432 HEAVY 48" SHOVELS 111,64 100' MATER HOSE FREIGHT ACCOUNT NUMBER 100-164-999-5242 190-180-999-5212 190-180-999-5301 190-183-999-5380 001-100-999-5260 001-100-999-5260 190-183-999-5380 190-183-999-5380 190-183-999-5380 190-183-999-5380 190-183-999-5380 190-180-999-5263 310-162-999-5214 190-180-999-526~ 001-150-999-5260 001-162-999-526S 001-163-999-5260 001-140-999-5220 001-163-999-5220 001-100-999-5260 001-140-999-5220 001-100-999-5258 001-161-999-5220 190-180-999-5222 190-180-999-5260 190-180-999-5220 190-180-999-5220 190-181-999-5301 190-18~-999-5350 190-183-999-5370 190-181-999-5212 190-180-999-5226 190-180-999-5226 190-180-999-5226 190-180-999-5226 310-164-999-5214 190-180-999-5212 190-180-999-5301 190-180-999-5301 190-180-999-5301 190-180-999-5301 190-180-999-5301 ITEM AMOUNT 211.57 ~,~ 5.81 7.~ 80.00 20,00 474,00 36.74 276.50 18.05 21.43 57.05 250.71 86,75 39.32 10,01 75.00 12.87 4.31 21.00 49.51 22.00 52.80 21,55 41.65 10.31 2.36 59.41 6.O0 61.70 257.75 15.00 15.00 15,00 15.00 34.47 25.07 396.00 80.00 30.00 85.00 29.61 PAGE 2 CHECK AMOUNT 310.92 100.00 826.72 394.51 489.80 25 7.75 60. O0 3~.47 25.07 VOUCHRE2 11/lt'''~ 15:2] VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE 12663 11/10/93 12664 11110193 12665 11/10/93 12666 11/10/93 126~7 11/10/93 12667 11/10/93 12667 11/10/93 12668 11/10/93 12669 11/10/93 12669 11/10/93 12670 11/10/93 12671 11/10/93 126~2..11/10/93 126,_ 11/10/93 1267~ 11/10/93 12674 11/10/93 12675 11/10/93 12676 11/10/93 12677 11/10/93 12678 11/10/93 12678 11/10/93 12678 11/10/93 12678 11/10/93 1267~ 11/10/93 1267~ 11/10/93 1267~ 11/10/93 1267~ 11/10/93 1267~ 11/10/93 12680 11/10/93 12681 11/10/93 12681 11/10/93 12681 11/10/93 CiTY OF TENEOULA ~q)UCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS VENDOR VENDOR iTEM NUMBER NAHE DESCRIPT/OR 000319 TOMARK SPORTS, INC. TAX 000403 SHAWN SCOTT POOL & SPA POOL SERVICE & MAINTENA 00042~ H & H CRAFT & FLORAL SU SUPPLIES 000428 HORIZON WATER OCT WATER 000430 GROUP AHERICA - VOLUNTA PRENIUH - NOV 1993 000430 GROUP AHERICA - VOLUNTA PRENIUH - NOV l~jr'~ 000430 GROUP AMERICA - VOLUNTA PREMIUM - NOV 1~ 000492 HcLARNEY, HARY JANE REIHB/CRA INSTITUTE COU 000558 ADVANCED HOBILECOII4 OCT MOBILE COVERAGE 000558 ADVANCED HOBILECOI,14 NOV. MOBILE COVERAGE 000587 MUNOZ, HARZO JANITORIAL SERVICES/SE 000(:43 FONTHER HARDHARE MISC HARDWARE SUPPLIES 0006/~. ASCE MEMBERSHIP RENEMAL 0006/,5 SHART & FINAL SUPPLIES 000645 SMART & FINAL CANDY FOR HALLOMSEN CAR 000653 LUCKY STORE TURKEY SHOOT SUPPLIES 000689 CAHPBELL'S LIGHTING SIG REPLACE LAHPS & INSTALL 000693 TIGER SOFTWARE MINI-DIAL INTERFACE & C 000695 iNSTITUTE OF TRANSPORTA ITE NEHBERSHIP RENEMAL/ 000704 SKS, INC./INLAND OIL FUEL 000704 SKS, INC./INLAND OIL FUEL 000704 SKS, INC./INLAND OIL FUEL 000704 SKS. INC./INLAND OIL FUEL 000727 NFPA FIRE PROTECTION HANDBOO 000727 NFPA INDUSTRIAL F/RE HA~RDS 000727 NFPA FIRE PROTECTION SU/DE T 000727 MFPA FRE/GHT 000727 NFPA TAX 0007~7 HARTLEY, BRUCE TU/TION REIMBURSEMENT 000910 KOLL MANAGEMENT SERVICE RENT/TEEN CENTER 000910 KOLL MANAGEMENT SERVICE RENT/TEEN CENTER 000910 KOLL MANAGEMENT SERVICE RENT/TEEN CENTER ACCOUNT NUMBER 190-180-~-5301 190-180-999-5212 190-180-~-5301 1~0-182-~-5240 001-2510 100-2510 1~0-2510 001-140-999-5261 320-199-~-520~ 320-19~-~99-520~ 190-181-999-5250 190-180-~-5212 001-163-99~-5226 190-181-999-5301 1~0-183-~-5370 190-183-~9~-5320 190-180-999-5212 320-199-~-5221 001-1&~-~-5226 001-110-~-5262 190-180-9~-52~ 001-162-~-5263 100-164-~-526~ 001-171-~-5228 001-171-~-5228 001-171-999-5228 001-171-~-5228 001-171-999-5228 001-150-~-5259 190-182-~9~-5234 190-182-~-5234 190-182-~99-523~ ITEM AMOUNT 45.80 90. O0 69.98 36.85 257.80 22.80 89. O0 122.63 225.00 225.00 200.00 7~.90 160.00 49.36 199.91 40. O0 152.76 206.90 178.00 21 111.16 42.10 334.85 94.50 67.50 67.75 4.15 16.96 400. O0 3,374.95 3,374.95 3,374.95 PAGE 3 CHECK AMOUNT 666.41 90.00 69.98 36.85 369.60 122,63 450,00 200.00 7~.90 160.00 249.27 40.00 152.76 206.90 178.00 509.76 250.86 400.00 10,124.85 VOUCHRE2 11/10/93 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 12682 126B 1268~ 12685 12686 12686 12~ 12686 12687 12687 12687 12688 12688 12689 12689 12689 12689 12689 12689 12689 12689 12689 1 Z689 12689 12690 12691 12692 15:23 CHECK DATE 11/10/93 11/10/93 11/10/93 11/10/93 11/10/93 11/10/93 11/10/93 11/10/93 11/10/93 11/10/93 11/10/93 11/10/93 11/10/93 11/10/93 11/10/93 11/10/93 11/10/93 11/10/93 11/10/93 11/10/93 11/10/93 11/10/93 11/10/9~ 11/10/93 11/10/93 11/10/93 11/10/93 VENDOR NU!iER OOO957 000992 001041 001056 001057 001057 001057 001057 001161 001161 001161 001179 001179 001193 001193 001193 001193 001193 001193 001193 001193 001193 001193 001193 001216 001217 001218 VENDOR NAME TEMECULA VALLEY FILM RANONA TIRE ARMSTRONG, DENNIS EXCEL LANDSCAPE PRO-SCAPE, INC. PRO-SCAPE, INC. PRO-SCAPE, INC. PRO-SCAPE, INC. COAST RESTAURANT SUPPLY COAST RESTAURANT SUPPLY COAST RESTAURANT SUPPLY TREBON COMPANY, THE TREBOR COMPANY, THE COMP USA CONP USA CONP USA COMP USA CONP USA COMP USA COMP USA COMP USA COMP USA COMP USA COMP USA APWA c/o LA COUNTY DEPT CENTER FOR CONTINUING S RANK OF COMMERCE CITY OF TENEOULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM ACCOUNT DESCR]PTION NUMBER LOAN 001-1500 TIRE SERVICES CiTY VEHI 310-180-999-5214 TUITION REIMBURSEMENT 001-150-999-5259 SEPT 93 LANDSCAPE NAINT 193-180-999-5415 /RR]OATION REPAIR, RANC ANNUAL LANDSCAPE NAINTE PROVIDE TEMPORARY LANDS APPLY FUNGICIDE TO CiTY 191-180-~99-5415 191-180-999-5415 1fO-180-f99-5250 193-180-999-5415 PK2 74 5/8" POSTS 2A48NK2 METROSEAL SHELV TAX 190-180-999-5242 190-180-999-5242 190-180-999-5242 X-LARGE WHIT VEST TAX 100-164-999-5218 100-164-999-5218 800100 CIqPD RTI01+ KEYB 320-199-999-5221 84,9960 ilR l ST PAD 851921 MOUSE PAD 864,522 PC PiNER CORD 6' 8~5484 MEDI SEKURIT 703304 ATT 25~ HANDSET 863925 VGA EXT 6' HD15 864301 KEYBD 6~ 5DIN M 863355 SER CABLE 6~ DB2 FRE I GHT TAX 320-199-999-5221 320-199-999-5221 320-199-999-5221 320-199-999-5221 320-199-999-5221 320-199-999-5221 320-199-999-5221 320-199-999-5221 320-199-999-5221 320-199-999-5221 REGISTRATION/NPDES WRKS 001-163-999-5261 CAL]F ECONOMIC GR{34TH E 001-140-999-5226 7 TRW REPORTS 280-199-999-5250 I TEN AMOUNT 2,500.00 33~.09 368. O0 11,302.24 155.48 337.41 300.54 172.50 167.40 700.20 67.24 59.00 4.57 156.24 58.95 45.00 29.00 13.31 9.44 19.90 13.80 5.40 10.00 25.45 50,00 210,11 21.00 PAGE 4 CHECK AMOUNT Z,500.O0 334.09 368.00 11,302.24 965.93 63.57 386.49 50.00 210.11 21.00 TOTAL CHECKS 40,758.58 VOUCHRE2 PAGE 3 11/1P""' 15:48 CITY OF TENECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 100 GAS TAX FUND 190 COIIqUN/TY SERVICES D/STRICT 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 210 CAPITAL INPROVENENT PROJ FUND 250 CAPITAL PROJECTS - TCSD 280 REDEVELOPNENT AGENCY - CZP 300 INSURANCE FUND 330 COPY CENTER FUND 340 FACILITIES 390 TCSD DEBT SERVICE TOTAL A!IXJNT 54,737.3~ 69°946.66 25,/,42.~8 13,888.51 25,6~9.00 350,800.86 833.50 ~,67~.86 1,758.00 1,~Z, 1,i'0 2,861 .::~. 530,08~.?.5 VOUCHRE2 CZTY OF TENECULA 11/10/93 15:68 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE 1 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAIqE DESCRIPTION NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 12696 11/23/93 PERUCHETTI, MICHAEL A. REFUND/PERUCHETTI, NICH 001'161'6103 12696 11/23/93 PERUCHETTI, MICHAEL A. REFUND/PERUCHETTI, NICH 001'161"6129 12695 11/23/93 HARKHAM & ASSOCIATES REFUND/MARKHAM & ASSOC. 001'161'6119 12695 11/23/93 HARKHAle & ASSOCIATES REFUND/HARKHAN & ASSOC. 001-161-6129 2,028,13 291,50 1,112,25 516.15 2,319.63 1,628.60 12696 11/23/93 000123 BURKE VILLIANS & SOREMS SERVICES OVER RETA]NER/001-130-999-52~6 12696 11/23/93 000123 BURKE UILLIANS & SORENS RETAINER/NOV 1993 001-130-999-5246 12696 11/23/93 000123 BURKE UILLIANS & SORENS PROF SERVICES THROUGH 0 300-199-999-5207 12696 11/23/93 000123 BURKE MILLJAMS & SORENS PROF SERVICES THROUGH 0 001-130-999-5266 12696 11/23/93 000123 BURKE ~ILL]ANS & SORENS PROF SERVICES THROUGH 0 001-1280 12696 11/23/93 000123 BURKE ~ILLIANS & SORENS PROF SERVICES THROUGH 0 190-180-999-5266 12696 11/23/93 000123 BURKE gILLIANS & SORENS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/S 001-130-999-5266 12696 11/23/93 000123 BURKE UZLLZANS & SORENS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/S 280-199-999-5266 3,601.23 3,150.00 2,676.86 25,053.06 258.86 1,927.56 6,717.65 833.50 42,216,70 12697 11/23/93 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE HONTHLY HAINT FOR OCTOB 190'180-999-5250 12697 11/23/93 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE PROVIDE ALL LABON AND M 190-180'999'5212 12697 11/23/93 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE PROVIDE LABOR AND HATER 190'180'999-5212 4,048.66 770.00 1,127.30 12698 11/23/93 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, INSURANCE PREMIUM 250-190-129-5806 5,190.00 5,190.00 12699 11/23/93 000163 COPY LINE CORPORATION 12700 11/23/93 000251 PLANNING CENTER, THE HAINTENANCE BASE CHARGE 330-199-999-5217 CODE AUGMENTATION 001-161-999-5268 1,758.00 3,787.82 3,78 .... 12701 11/23/93 000271 ROBERT BEIN, k~4 FROST & PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/S 210-165-606-5802 1,800,00 1,800.00 12702 11/23/93 000302 SYSTEM SOURCE 12702 11/23/93 000302 SYSTEM SOURCE 12703 11/23/93 000/,06 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHER]F 12703 11/23/93 000606 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF 12706 11/23/93 000676 ARBOR-PRO TREE SERVICE 12705 11/23/93 000678 RIVERSIDE CO. HEALTH SE 12706 11/23/93 000712 FORD, STEVEN J, 12707 11/23/93 000883 NONTELEONE EXCAVATING 12708 11/23/93 000929 T,B. PENICK 12708 11/23/93 000929 T,B. PEN]CK 12708 11/23/93 000929 T,B. PENICK 12708 11/23/93 000929 T,B, PENICK 12709 11/23/93 000979 DEL RIO ENTERPRISE 12709 11/23/93 000979 DEL RIO ENTERPRISE 12709 11/23/93 000979 DEL RIO ENTERPRISE 12710 11/23/93 001007 NPG CORP, BOOKCASE,SHELVES ETC OVERHEAD BIKE PATROL/AUGUST 1{~3 BIKE PATROL/SEPTEMBER 1 PREVENTIVE NAINT ANIHAL CONTROL/SEPT. PROJECT CO-OBD FEES OCT ~ORK ORDER ~3-96-39 CONTINGENCY FOR CRC RETENTION CONTINGENCY CONSTRUCTION OF CRC RETENTION gORKONDER 93-96 VORK ORDER 93-96 f/55 MORK ORDER 93-96 #57 BORK ORDER i~93-96-8 EXT ~60-199-999-5219 360-199-999-5219 001-170-999-5326 001-170-999-5326 100-16~-999-5602 001-172-999-5255 250-190-129-5804 100-164-999-5602 250-190-129-5804 250-2035 250-190-129-580~ 250-2035 100-164-999-5602 100-164-999-5602 100-164-999-5602 100-164-999-5602 1,262.84 178.86 2,136.00 1,958.55 6,100,00 6,601.16 6,800.00 2,610.68 49,056.13 4,905.61- 326,069.99 32,603.71' 1,219.75 6,612.68 6,672.25 3,265.00 1,641.70 4,096.55 6,100,00 6,601.16 6,800.00 2,610.68 337,595.00 10,304.68 VOUCHRE2 PAGE 2 11/lf"" 15:48 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER 12710 11/23/93 001007 12710 11/23/93 001007 12710 11/23/93 001007 12711 11/23/93 001037 12711 11/23/93 001037 12711 11/23/93 001037 12711 11/23/93 001037 12712 11/23/93 001056 12713 11/2~/93 001058 12713 11/23/93 001058 12714 11/23/93 001124 12714 11/23/93 001124 12715 11/23/93 001151 12715 11/23/93 001151 12716 11/23/93 001168 12~""" 1/23/93 001180 127'~ - 11/23/93 001180 12717 11/23/93 001180 12718 11/23/93 001181 12718 11/2~/93 001181 12719 11/23/93 001191 12720 11/23/93 001195 VENDOR N/tHE NPG CORP, NPG CORP. NPG CORP, FALLBROOK LANDSCAPE & N FALLBROOK LANDSCAPE & M FALLBROOK LANDSCAPE & M FALLBROOK LANDSCAPE & N EXCEL LANDSCAPE ACCURATE LANDSCAPE ACCURATE LANDSCAPE CUNNINGHAM-DAVIS CORP, CUNNINGHAM-DAV]S CORP. PAC/FIC EGUIP~ENT &/RR PACIFIC EGUIP~ENT & IRR BANK OF AMERICA J ,A.M,S, J ,A,M,S, J ,A,M.S, SOUTH BAY SECURITY IRON SOUTH BAY SECURITY IRON C & C GRADING & PAVING CENTRAL SECURITY SERVIC CITY OF TENECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION VIA LOeO CHARNEL ACCESS R & R APPROX 282' 6" A. R & R DRIVEHAY APPROACT ANNUAL LANDSCAPE NAINTE ANNUAL LANDSCAPE HAINTE ANNUAL LANDSCAPE HAINTE ANNUAL LANDSCAPE NAINTE LANDSCAPE NAINT FOR OCT LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ADDITIONAL ]RRIGATIOR RIVERTON PARK CONSTRUCT RETENTION CUSHMAN 4 WHEEL TRUCKST TAX TCSD BOND ADMIN CHARGES ADMINISTRATION AND HEAR ADMINISTRATION AND HEAR ADMINISTRATION AND HEAR EXTRA MORK IN ASSOCIATI EXTRA WORK IN ASSOCIATi MORK ORDER ~-94 f/62 PRE MIRE AT CRC TOTAL CHECKS ACCOUNT NUMBER 100-164-999-5401 100-164-999-5402 100-164-999-5402 193-180-999-5415 193-180-999-5415 193-180-999-5415 19~-180-999-5~15 19~-180-999-5415 190-180-999-5250 190-180-999-5250 210-190-131-5804 210-2035 190-180-999-5610 190-180-999-5610 390-1990 001-162-999-5248 001-162-999-52~8 001-162-999-52~8 190-26~0 210-199-801-580~ 100-164-999-5402 250-190-129-5804 ITEM AMOUNT 19,930.00 990.00 975.00 412.68 209.85 789.30 11,302.24 6,172.00 377.86 26,270.26 2,627.03' 9,276.00 718.89 2,861.34 650.00 525.00 350.00 1,024.23 255.77 5,791.50 1,215.86 CHECK AMOUNT 25,140.00 2,586.27 11,302.24 6,549.86 23,6~3.23 9,~4.89 2,861 1,525.00 1,280.00 5,791.50 1,215.86 530,084.25 ITEM NO. 4 TO: APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY ~ FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works\City Engineer November 23, 1993 Award of Contract for Pujol St. & First St. Street Widening (Project No. PW92-09) PREPARED BY: Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1. Award a contract for the Pujol St. & First Street Widening, Project PW92-09, to IPS Services, Inc for $73,393.31, and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract and; 2. Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $7,339.33, which is equal to 10% of the contract amount. BACKGROUND: On July 13, 1993, the City Council approved the construction plans and specifications, and authorized the Department of Public Works to solicit public construction bids. The project includes installation of curb & gutter, sidewalk, pavement and street lighting to widen the east side of Pujol Street from the Town Association to First St. The engineer's estimate for this project was $75,000. Five bids for the project were publicly opened on October 28, 1993 and November 9,1993. The bids received were as follows: 1. IPS Services, Inc ............................ $73,393.31. 2. Accurate Construction ....................... $77,307.10. 3. Gosney Construction ......................... $77,552.50. 4. E.A. Mendoza ............................. $77,885.00. 5. Dobson Equipment Rentals, Inc .................. $78,798.85. Bids were originally received on September 9, 1993 but were rejected and re-bid. -1 - pwO4%agdrpt%93%1123\pw92-O9.awd 1105 IPS Services, Inc. recently completed, to the City Engineer's satisfaction, the construction of the parking lot improvements at the Senior Center. The construction schedule is for 30 working days, with work expected to begin at the beginning of December and be completed at the beginning of February. A copy of the bid summary is available for review in the City Engineer's office. FISCAL IMPACT: This project is a Capital Improvement Project and is being funded from Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds. The total project amount of $80,732.64 includes the Contract amount of ~73,393.31 plus the 10% contingency of $7,339.33. The project funds are budgeted in account #210-165-628-5804. -2- pwO4%egdrpt\93\1123~w92-O9.ewd 1105 CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CONTRACT FOR PROJECT NO. PW92-09 PUJOL ST. & fST ST. STREET WIDENING THIS CONTRACT, made and entered into the 23rd day of November, 1993, by and between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CITY", and IPS Services, Inc,, hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR." WITNESSETH: That CITY and CONTRACTOR, for the consideration hereinafter named, mutually agree as follows: 1.8. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The complete Contract includes all of the Contract Documents, to wit: Notice Inviting Bids, Instructions to Bidders, Proposal, Performance Bond, Labor and Materials Bond, Plans and Specifications entitled PROJECT NO. PW92-09, Insurance Forms, this Contract, and all modifications and amendments thereto, the State of California Department of Transportation Standard Specifications (1992 Ed.) where specifically references in the Plans and Technical Specifications, and the latest version of the Standard Soecifications for Public Works Construction, including all supplements as written and promulgated by the Joint Cooperative Committee of the Southern California Chapter of the American Associated General Contractors of California (hereinafter, "Standard Specifications") as amended by the General Specifications, Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications for PROJECT NO. PW92-09. Copies of these Standard Specifications are available from the publisher: Building News, Incorporated 3055 Overland Avenue Los Angeles, California 90034 (213) 202-7775 The Standard Specifications will control the general provisions, construction materials, and construction methods for this Contract except as amended by the Plans and Specifications of this Contract. In case of conflict between the Standard Specifications and the other Contract Documents, the other Contract Documents shall take precedence over and be used in lieu of such conflicting portions. Where the Plans or Specifications describe portions of the work in general terms, but not in complete detail, it is understood that the item is to be furnished and installed completed and in 'place and that-only the best general practice is to be used. Unless otherwise CONTRACT CA-1 pwO1~pw92-Og~bidpkg 100593 e specified, the CONTRACTOR shall furnish all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and incidentals, and do all the work involved in executing the Contract. The Contract Documents are complementary, and what is called for by anyone shall be as binding as if called for by all. Any conflict between this Contract and any other Contract Document shall be resolved in favor of this Contract. SCOPE OF WORK. CONTRACTOR shall perform everything required to be performed, shall provide and furnish all the labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable equipment, and all utility and transportation services required for the following: PROJECT NO. PW92-09 PUJOL ST. & 1 ST ST. STREET WIDENING All of said work to be performed and materials to be furnished shall be in strict accordance with the Drawings and Specifications and the provisions of the Contract Documents hereinabove enumerated and adopted by CITY. The plans and specifications for the referenced project are hereby made a part of this contract. CITY APPROVAL. All labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services shall be furnished and work performed and completed under the direction and supervision and subject to the approval of CITY or its authorized representatives. CONTRACT AMOUNT AND SCHEDULE. CITY agrees to pay and CONTRACTOR agrees to accept in full payment for the work above-agreed to be done, the sum of: Seventy three thousand three hiredred and ninety three DOLLARS and thirty.one CENTS ($73,393.31), the total amount of the base bid. CONTRACTOR agrees to complete the work in a period not to exceed THIRTY (30} working days, commencing with delivery of Notice to Proceed by CITY. Construction shall not commence until bonds and insurance are approved by CITY. CHANGE ORDERS. All change orders shall be approved by the City Council, except that the City Manager is hereby authorized by the City Council to make, by written order, changes or additions to the work in an amount not to exceed the contingency as established by the City Council. PAYMENTS. On or about the thirtieth (30th) day of the month next following the commencement of the work, there shall be paid to the CONTRACTOR a sum equal to ninety percent (90%) of the value of the work completed since the commencement of the work. Thereafter, on or about the thirtieth (30th) day of each successive month as the work progresses, the CONTRACTOR shall be paid such sum as will bring the payments each month up to ninety percent (90%) of the previous payments, provided that the CONTRACTOR submits his request for payment prior to the last day of each preceding month. The final payment, if unencumbered, or any part thereof unencumbered, shall be made.sixty .(60) days after CITY acceptance of the work and the CONTRACTOR filing a one-year warranty with the CITY on a warranty form provided by the CITY. Payments shall CONTRACT CA-2 pwO1%pw92-O9~idpkg 100593 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. may be obtained at cost at the City Clerk's office of Temecula. CONTRACTOR shall post a copy of such wage rates at the job site and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum. CONTRACTOR shall comply with the provisions of Sections 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code. Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, CONTRACTOR shall forfeit to the CITY, as a penalty, the sum of ~25.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any work done under this Contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of the Contract. Contractor agrees to utilize Federal job classifications for submittal of certified payroll and further agrees to pay all its employees the higher of the prevailing State or Federal wages. LIABILITY INSURANCE. CONTRACTOR, by executing this Agreement, hereby certifies: "1 am aware of the provision of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which requires every employer to be insured against liability for Workers' Compensation or undertake self- insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this Contract." TIME OF THE ESSENCE. Time is of the essence in this Contract. INDEMNIFICATION. All work covered by this Contract done at the site of construction or in preparing or delivering materials to the site shall be at the risk of CONTRACTOR alone. CONTRACTOR agrees to save, indemnify, hold harmless and defend CITY, its officers, employees, and agents, against any and all liability, injuries, or death of persons (CONTRACTOR's employees included) and damage to property, arising directly or indirectly out of the obligations herein undertaken or out of the operations conducted by CONTRACTOR, save and except claims or litigations arising through the sole active negligence or sole willful misconduct of the CITY. CONTRACTOR'S INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION. No plea of ignorance of conditions that exist or that may hereafter exist or of conditions of difficulties that may be encountered in the execution of the work under this Contract, as a result of failure to make the necessary independent examinations and investigations, and no plea of reliance on initial investigations or reports prepared by CITY for purposes of letting this Contract out to bid will be accepted as an excuse for any failure or omission on the part of the CONTRACTOR to fulfill in every detail all requirements of this Contract. Nor will such reasons be accepted as a basis for any claims whatsoever for extra compensation or for an extension of time. GRATUITIES. CONTRACTOR warrants that neither it nor any of its employees, agents, or representatives has offered or given any gratuities or promises to CITY's employees, agents, or representatives with a view toward securing this Contract or securing favorable treatment with respect thereto. CONFLICT OF INTEREST. CONTRACTOR warrants that he has no blood or marriage relationship, and that he is not in any way associated with any City officer or employee, · or any architect, engineer, or other puerperal of the. Drawings and Specifications for this CONTRACT CA-4 pwO1~ow92-O9%bidpkg 100593 be made on demands drawn int he manner required by law, accompanied by a certificate signed by the City Manager, stating that the work for which payment is demanded has been performed in accordance with the terms of the Contract, and that the amount stated in the certificate is due under the terms of the Contract. Partial payments \on the Contract price shall not be considered as an acceptance of any part of the work. WARRANTY RETENTION. Commencing with the date the Notice of Completion is recorded, the CITY shall retain a portion of the Contract award price, to assure warranty performance and correction of construction deficiencies according to the following schedule: CONTRACT AMOUNT $25,000- $75,000 $75,000- ~500,000 Over$500,000 RETENTION PERIOD RETENTION PERCENTAGE 180 days 3% 180 days 2% One Year 1% 10. Failure by the CONTRACTOR to take corrective action within twenty-four (24) hours after personal or telephonic notice by the CITY on items affecting use of facility, safety, or deficiencies will result in the CITY taking whatever corrective action it deems necessary. All costs resulting from such action by the CITY will be deducted from the retention. The amount of retention provided for her. in shall not be deemed a limitation upon the responsibility of the CONTRACTOR to carry out the terms of the Contract Documents LIQUIDATED DAMAGES: EXTENSION OF TIME. In accordance with Government Code Section 53069.85, CONTRACTOR agrees to forfeit and pay to CITY the sum of One Thousand Dollars (~ 1,000.00) per day for each calendar day completion is delayed beyond the time allowed pursuant to Paragraph 4 of this Contract. Such sum shall be deducted from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. Such sum shall be deducted from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR will be granted an extension of time and will not be assessed liquidated damages for unforeseeable delays beyond the control of and without the fault or negligence of the CONTRACTOR including delays caused by CITY. CONTRACTOR is required to promptly notify CITY of any such delay. WAIVER OF CLAIMS. Unless a shorter time is specified elsewhere in this Contract, on or before making final request for payment under Paragraph 6 above, CONTRACTOR shall submit to CITY, in writing, all claims for compensation under or arising out of this Contract; the acceptance by CONTRACTOR of the final payment shall constitute a waiver of all claims against CITY under or arising out of this Contract except those previously made in writing and request for payment. CONTRACTOR shall be required to execute an affidavit, release and indemnify agreement with each claim for payment. PREVAILING WAGES. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each craft, classification,-or type of workman needed to execute this Contract, from the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations. These rates are on file with the City Clerk. Copies CONTRACT CA-3 pwO1 ~pw92-Og~bidpkg 100593 17. 18. 19. project. CONTRACTOR further warrants that no person in his/her employ has been employed by the CITY within one year of the date of the Notice Inviting Bids. CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT. After the completion of the work contemplated by this Contract, CONTRACTOR shall file with the City Manager his affidavit stating that all workmen and persons employed, all firms supplying materials, and all subcontractors upon the Project have been paid in full, and that there are no claims outstanding against the Project for either labor or materials, except certain items, if any, to be set forth in an affidavit covering disputed claims or items in connection with a Stop Notice which has been filed under the provisions of the laws of the State of California. SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTOR Corporations: The signature must contain the name of the corporation, must be signed by the President and Secretary or Assistant Secretary, and the corporate seal must be affixed. Other persons may sign for the corporation in lieu of the above if a certified copy of a resolution of the corporate board of directors so authorizing them to do so is on file in the City Clerk's office. Partnerships: The names of all persons comprising the partnership or co-partnership must be stated. The bid must be signed by all partners comprising the partnership unless proof in the form of a certified copy of a certificate of partnership acknowledging the signer to be a general partner is presented to the City Clerk, in which case the general partner may sign, Joint Ventures: Bids submitted as joint ventures must so state and be signed by each joint venturer. Individuals: Bids submitted by individuals must be signed by the bidder, unless an up-to-date power of attorney is on file in the City Clsrk's office, in which case said person may sign for the individual. The above rules also apply in the case of the use of a fictitious firm name. In addition, however, where the fictitious name is used, it must be so indicated in the signature. SUBSTITUTED SECURITY. In accordance with Section 22300 of the Public Contracts Code, CONTRACTOR may substitute securities for any monies withheld by the CITY to ensure performance under the Contract. At the request and expense of the CONTRACTOR, securities equivalent to the amount withheld shall be deposited with the CITY or with a state or faderally chartered bank or an escrow agent who shall pay such monies to the CONTRACTOR upon notification by CITY of CONTRACTOR's satisfactory completion of the Contract. The type of securities deposited and the method of release shall be approved by the City Attorney's office. CONTRACT CA-5 pwOl~pw92-Og~bidpkg 100593 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. RESOLUTION OF CLAIMS. Any dispute or claim arising out of this Contract shall be arbitrated pursuant to Section 10240 of the California Public Contracts Code. NOTICE TO CITY OF LABOR DISPUTES. Whenever CONTRACTOR has knowledge that any actual or potential labor dispute is delaying or threatens to delay the timely performance of the Contract, CONTRACTOR shall immediately give notice thereof, including all relevant information with respect thereto, to CITY. BOOKS AND RECORDS. CONTRACTOR's books, records, and plans or such part thereof as may be engaged in the performance of this Contract, shall at all reasonable times be subject to inspection and audit by any authorized representative of the CITY. UTILITY LOCATION. CITY acknowledges its responsibilities with respect to locating utility facilities pursuant to California Government Code Section 4215. REGIONAL NOTIFICATION CENTERS. CONTRACTOR agrees to contact the appropriate regional notification center in accordance with Government Code Section 4216.2. TRENCH PROTECTION AND EXCAVATION. CONTRACTOR shall submit its detailed plan for worker protection during the excavation of trenches required by the scope of the work in accordance with Labor Code Section 6705. CONTRACTOR shall, without disturbing the condition, notify CITY in writing as soon as CONTRACTOR, or any of CONTRACTOR's subcontractors, agents, or employees have knowledge and reporting is possible, of the discovery of any of the following conditions: The presence of any material that the CONTRACTOR believes is hazardous waste, as defined in Section 25117 of the Health end Safety Code; ii. Subsurface or latent physical conditions at the site differing from those indicated in the specifications; or III. Unknown physical conditions at the site of any unusual nature, different materially for those ordinarily encountered and generally recognized as inherent in work of the character provided for in this Contract. Pending a determination by the CITY of appropriate action to be taken, CONTRACTOR shall provide security measures (e.g., fences) adequate to prevent the hazardous waste or physical conditions from causing bodily injury to any person. CITY shall promptly investigate the reported conditions. If CITY, through, and in the exercise of its sole discretion, determines that the conditions do materially differ, or do involve hazardous waste, and will cause a decrease or increase in the CONTRACTOR's cost of, or time required for, performance of any part of the work, then CITY shall issue a change order. In the event of a dispute between CITY and CONTRACTOR as to whether the conditions materially differ, or involve ,hazardous waste, or cause a decrease or ~ increase in the CONTRACTOR's cost of, or time required for, performance of any CONTRACT CA-6 pwO1~pw92-O9Maidpkg 100593 26. 27. 28. 29. part of the work, CONTRACTOR shell not be excused from any scheduled completion date, and shall proceed with all work to be performed under the contract. CONTRACTOR shall retain any and all rights which pertain to the resolution of disputes and protests between the parties. INSPECTION. The work shall be subject to inspection and testing by CITY and its authorized representatives during manufacture and construction and all other times and places, including without limitation, the plans of CONTRACTOR and any of its suppliers. CONTRACTOR shall provide all reasonable facilities and assistance for the safety and convenience of inspectors. All inspections end tests shall be performed in such manner as to not unduly delay the work. The work shall be subject to final inspection and acceptance notwithstanding any payments or other prior inspections. Such final inspection shall be made within a reasonable time after completion of the work. DISCRIMINATION. CONTRACTOR represents that it has not, and agrees that it will not, discriminate in its employment practices on the basis of race, creed, religion, national origin, color, sex, age, or handicap. GOVERNING LAW. This Contract and any dispute arising hereunder shall be governed by the law of the State of California. WRITTEN NOTICE. Any written notice required to be given in any part of the Contract Documents shall be performed by depositing the same in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid, directed to the address of the CONTRACTOR as set forth in the Contract Documents, and to the CITY addressed as follows: Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590-3606 CONTRACT CA-7 pwO1%pw92-O9%bidpkg 100593 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Contract to be executed on the date first above written. DATED: CONTRACTOR By: Print or type NAME Print or type TITLE DATED: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY OF TEMECULA By: J. Sal Mu~oz, Mayor Scott F. Field, City Attorney ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk CONTRACT CA-8 pw01%pw92-O9~bidpkg 100593 ITEM 5 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY ~~ FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer November 23, 1993 Completion and Acceptance of the Sidewalk Improvements on the south side of Rancho Vista Road between Mira Loma Drive and the Community Recreation Center, Project No. PW92-12 PREPARED BY: Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council accept the Sidewalk Improvements on the south side of Rancho Vista Road between Mira Loma Drive and the Community Recreation Center, Project No. PW92-12, as complete and direct the City Clerk to: File the Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a one (1) year Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract, and Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after the filing of the Notice of Completion if no liens have been filed. BACKGROUND: On September 14, 1993, the City Council awarded a contract for the Sidewalk Improvements on the south side of Rancho Vista Road between Mira Loma Drive and the Community Recreation Center, Project No. PW92-12 to Gosney Construction Backhoe & Equipment. Improvements included installation of concrete sidewalk, handicap access ramps, and the relocation of existing fences. The Contractor has completed the work in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and within the allotted contract time to the satisfaction of the City Engineer· The construction retention for this project will be released thirty-five (35) days after the Notice of Completion has been recorded. pwO4%egdrpt%93~1123%pw92-12.ecc 1109 FISCAL IMPACT: The contract amount for this project was $26,488.10 with a contingency of $2,648.81. The total cost of the project will increase due to e change in the final bid quantities by 212.70, bringing the total project cost to $26,700.80. This project is being partially funded from Bicycle and Pedestrian Project Funds (SB 821) which are administrated by the Riverside County of Transportation Commission in the amount of $18,000. The remainder of the project is being funded through Development Impact Funds. Attachment: Notice of Completion Maintenance Bond pwO4~agdrpt~93\1123~pw92-12.ecc 1109 RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND RETURN TO: CITY CLERK CITY OF TEMECULA 43174 Buaineaa Perk DHve Temeeula, CA 92590 SPACE ABOVE THIS UNE FOR RECORDER'S USE NOTICE OF COMPLETION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT: 1. The City of Temecula is the owner of the property hereinafter described. 2. The full address of the City of Temecula is 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California 92590. 3. A Contract was awarded by the City of Temecula to Gosney Construction Backhoe & Equipment to perform the following work of improvement: PW92-12 SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RANCHO VISTA ROAD BETWEEN MIRA LOMA DRIVE AND THE COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER. 4. Said work was completed by said company according to plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works of the City of Temecula and that said work was accepted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on November 23, 1993. That upon said contract the DEVELOPERS INSURANCE COMPANY was surety for the bond given by the said company as required by law. 5. The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, and is described as follows: PROJECT PW 92-12. 6. The street address of said property is: INTERSECTION OF RANCHO VISTA ROAD AND MIRA LOMA DRIVE. Dated at Temecula, California, this _ day of ,1993. STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) CITY OF TEMECULA ) ss JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California and do hereby certify under penalty of pedury, that the foregoing NOTICE OF COMPLETION is true and correct, and that said NOTICE OF COMPLETION was duly and regularly ordered to be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder of Riverside by said City Council. Dated at Temecula, California, this day of ,1993. JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk FormdC!:P-001 Rev. 12-5-91 pwO4~w92-O8\completn.not O72193 ITEM NO. 6 APPROVAL i~ CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer November 23, 1993 "No Parking" Zone on Ynez Road North of Winchester Road PREPARED BY: Martin C. Lauber, Traffic Engineer RECOMMENDATION: The Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 93- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING "NO PARKING" ZONE ON YNEZ ROAD FROM WINCHESTER ROAD TO A POINT 540' NORTH. BACKGROUND: The Traffic Division has prepared a striping Plan for Ynez Road north of Winchester Road including County Center Drive and Equity Drive to its ultimate configuration. The ultimate configuration of Ynez Road will consist of five (5) lanes; four (4) twelve foot through lanes and a twelve foot two way left turn lane. The striping configuration on County Center Drive and Equity Drive will consist of two (2) thirteen foot through lanes and a fourteen foot two way left turn lane. Parking will be accommodated on both sides of County Center Drive, Equity Drive, and most of Ynez Road. Due to the reduction of street width on Ynez Road, 540 feet north of Winchester Road, staff recommends that this portion be designated as a "No Parking" zone to accommodate for uniform lane configurations. At the October 28, 1993 Public/Traffic Safety Commission meeting, the Commission recommended that the City Council approve the "No Parking" zones on Ynez Road from Winchester Road to a point 540' north of Winchester as shown on Exhibit "A". -1 - pwl 5\agdrpt%93%1123~1123stop.lau FISCAL IMPACT 590 feet of red curb ~ $0.58/L.F. = $342 Attachments: Resolution No. 93- Exhibit "A" -2- pwl 5%agdrpt%93%l 123%1123etop.lau RESOLUTION NO. 93- A RESOLUTION OF ~ CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECI~A ESTABLISHING *NO PARKING" ZONE ON YNI~.Z ROAD FROM WINCI~'F-~TER ROAD TO A POINT 540' NORTH. The City Council of the City of Temecula does resolve, determine and order as follows: Section 1. Pursuant to Section 12.08.216 of Ordinance No. 91-16, which the City has adopted by reference, the following "No Parking" zone is hereby established in the City of Temecula: A. "No Parking" on Ynez Road from Winchester Road to a Point S40' North of Winchester Road as shown on Exlfibit "A ". Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution. PASSI~, ,4~PPROVED ~ ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 23rd day of November, 1993. J. Sal Mu~oz, Mayor ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] -3- pwl 5\agdrpfi93%1123%1123etop.lau ITEM NO. 7 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: PREPARED BY: RECOMMENDATION: APPROVi~L CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council Mary Jane McLarney Finance Officer November 23, 1993 Adoption of Travel Policy City Clerk June S. Greek Continue to the meeting of December 14, 1993, to allow staff time to develop requested information. svvj ITEM NO. 8 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer November 23, 1993 Pala Community Park PW93-03CSD Acceptance of Offer of Dedication -Temecula Lane and Loma Linda Road PREPARED BY: Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 93-_ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN OFFER OF DEDICATION FOR STREET AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES, BUT NOT ACCEPTING INTO THE CITY-MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM, PORTIONS OF LOMA LINDA ROAD AND TEMECULA LANE. BACKGROUND: On October 26, 1993 the City Council awarded the construction contract for Pala Community Park to Martin J. Jaska, Inc. The 28.6 acre park is located along the southerly side of Temecula Creek approximately 1500' north of the intersection of Pala Road and Loma Linda Road. The park has been designed such that access and water service will be constructed within portions of Temecula Lane and Loma Linda Road. These portions of Loma Linda Road and Temecula Lane were offered to the County of Riverside for public utility and road purposes on Parcel Map No. 8856, but were not accepted by the County Board of Supervisors. These roads are essential for access to the proposed park site and at this time staff recommends their acceptance for right-of-way purposes only. An offer remains open unless the governing authority rejects the offer and summarily vacates the agency's interests. Upon completion of the work, staff will recommend acceptance of these streets into the City-maintained street system. I ~agdrpt~93\ 1026\8econdvac FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact has been identified in accepting the offer of dedication for these road segments. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution No. 93- with Exhibits "A-B", inclusive. 2 %agdrpt%93\1026\secondvec RESOLUTION NO. 93- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY OF TEMECULA, CAIJFORNIA, ACCEFfiNG AN OFFER OF DEDICATION FOR STREET AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURI~SF~, BUT NOT ACCEFrING INTO THE CITY-MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM, PORTIONS OF LOMA IJNDA ROAD AND TEMECULA LANE. The City Council of the City of Temecuh does resolve, determine and order as follows: WFrF. REAS, the portions of Loma Linda Road and Temecula Lane as depicted in Exhibit "A " attached hereto, have been offered for dedication to the County of Riverside on Parcel Map No. 8856; WI~REAS, the offer of dedication of these portions of Loma Linda Road and Temecula Lane was not accepted by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Riverside; WHEREAS, the legal description for these portions of Loma Linda Road and Temecula Lane is set forth in Exhibit "B" , attached hereto; WHEREAS, the City desires to accept the offer of dedication for these portions of Loma Lincla Road and Temecula Lane; NOW, TtlERI~-FORE, BE IT RESOLVEB by the City Council of the City of Temecula as follows: Section 1. That the City of Temecula accept the offer of dedication of the portions of Loma Linda Road and Temecula Lane as dedicated on Parcel Map No. 8856 and described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto. Section 2. That the City of Temecula does not accept these portions of Loma Linda Road and Temecula Lane into the City-maintained street system at this time. Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 23rd day of November, 1993. J. Sat Mu~oz, Mayor ATTEST: June S. Greek City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY OF TEMECULA I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 93- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 23rd day of November, 1993, by the following vote: COUNCH,/VIEMBERS: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBFAS: COUNCII/VIF/VIBERS: COUNCILlVnu-MBERS: EXHIBIT "A" TO RESOLUTION NO. 93- SUBJECT DEDICATION - PORTIONS OF LOMA LINDA ROAD AND TEMECULA LANE ! PAZA EXHIBIT "B" TO RESOLUTION NO. 93- Offers of dedication for road and public utility purposes made on Parcel Map No. 8856, but not accepted by The Riverside County Board of Supervisors: Lots "B", "C", "E" and "F" on Parcel Map No. 8856 recorded in Book 41, pages 72 and 73 of Parcel Maps. ITEM NO. APPROVAL ~ CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER _ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: City Council/City Manager Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: November 23, 1993 SUBJECT: Final Vesting Tract Map No. 24135-3 PREPARED BYeJim D. Faul, Assistant RECOMMENDATION: Engineer That the City Council approve Final Vesting Tract Map No. 24135-3 subject to the Conditions of Approval. BACKGROUND: Tract No. 24135 was originally submitted to Riverside County Planning Department on January 3, 1989. The Tentative Vesting Tract Map was approved by the Board of Supervisors on May 23, 1989. Final Vesting Tract No. 24135-3 contains ninety-seven (97) residential lots and six (6) open space lots within 25.83 gross acres. The tract is located on the southeast corner of Margarita Road and Santiago Road. This tract is part of the Meadows Specific Plan (SP 219) and Development Agreement No. 4. The applicant is KRDC, Inc. The following fees have been paid for Final Vesting Tract Map No. 24135-3: Signal Mitigation Fee Fire Mitigation Fee Stephen's K-Rat Fee $14,550.00 38,800.00 50,368.50 The following fees have been deferred for Final Vesting Tract Map No. 24135-3: Public Facilities Fee Flood Control Fee (ADP) Due prior to Building Permit N/A, per RCFCD letter dated 9-17-93 -1 - pw 15%egdrpt%93%24135-3.agn 1123 The requirement of Quimby Fees (park fees) was to be satisfied pursuant to the Amended and Restated Development Agreement between the City of Temecula and KRDC, Inc. (formerly Bedford Development Company) and Mesa Homes, which became effective on January 31, 1992. Among other things, this Development Agreement provides for the granting of several improved parks to the City. The first park area to be granted to the City is located in the southeast portion of Paloma Del Sol. The park improvements are completed and the City would be in a position to accept the improvements, except for the fact that a dispute has arisen concerning the allocation of an assessment lien under Assessment District 159 to the site. This dispute is set forth in detail in the attached correspondence. Staff is hopeful that this dispute can be resolved in the next month. Staff is not recommending at this time that the recordation of this map be delayed as a result of this dispute. Final Vesting Tract No. 24135-3 was granted an extension of time by the "Amendment and Restatement of Development Agreement - Paloma Del Sol" recorded February 18, 1993. The following bonds have been posted for Final Vesting Tract Map No. 24135-3: Faithful Labor & Subdivision Performance Material Monument Street and Drainage $308,000 $154,000 Water $69,500 $34,750 Sewer $70,000 $35,000 Survey Monuments $35,500 FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Development Fee Checklist Location Map Copy of Map Conditions of Approval Fees and Securities Report Letter of October 28, 1993, from Scott F. Field, City Attorney to Bryan Norren, KRDC Letter to Bryan Noreen to David Dixon, City Manager, dated November 4, 1993 -2- pw 15%egdrpt%93%24135-3.agn 1123 CITY OF TEMECULA DEVELOPMENT FEE CHECKLIST Final Vestino Tract Mao No. 24135-3 The following fees were reviewed by Staff relative to their applicability to this project. Fee Habitat Conservation Plan (K-Rat) Parks and Recreation (Quimby Fees) Public Facility (Traffic Mitigation) Public Facility (Traffic Signal Mitigation) Public Facility (Library) Fire Protection Flood Control (ADP) Condition of Aooroval Condition No. 26.b See Staff Report N/A See Road Department Letter Dated 4/17/89, Item 22 N/A See Fire Department Letter Dated 2/24/89 Condition No. 14 N/A per RCFCD letter dated 9-17-93 -3- pw15%agdrpt%93%24135-3.egn 1123 VIClN.'TY MAP A/D T TO SCALE f DATE: June 8, 1989. ' iVE )iDE counc.u PLanninG DEP CiilEnC' TO: Surveyor Road 8utldtng & Safety Flood ranttel Health F I re fTotectl on TENTATIVE VESTING TRACT YAP NO. 24135 Amd. SPECIFIC PLANS TEAM The ltverside County 9oard of SupervSsors has taken the following action on the above referenced tentative vesting map: ,L, RPPROVED tentative map subject to the attached conditions sibmttted). (no waiver request · DElllED tentative map based on the attached findings. APPROVED tentative map subject to attached conditions and DENIED request for waiver of the final map. .. .APPROVED tentative map and APPROVED request for waiver of the final map. subject to all XPPROVEO 'Extension of Tim to 'previously approved conditions. APPROYED Extension of Time Frevtously approved conditions. DE!l]EDExtenston of Time APPROVEDwIt!~trawal of tentative map. N~PROVED Minor Change to revise originally '"approved conditions as shown (attached), to subject to all DENIED requestfor Minor Change. ItPPROVED Minor Cl~m~geEt~Dwatve the final map. Bannin] indio 4080 LEMON STREET, 9TM FLOOR RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92501 (714) 787-6181 NL Very truly yours, E~' /YERSZDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT ~"ger $. $treeter, Planning Director bb . yr . RS Ron Goldman - Principal Planner 46-~09 OASIS STREET, ROOM 304 INDIO, CALIFORNIA 92201 (619) 342-8277 PLANN3N3E~AR~/~T S~B~ETDLEB~: Nay 15, 1989 I r~ O O r'~ r-~ ~~: V~'ZZNG ~ NO. 24131/~d. No. i - VESTING ~CT. NO 24132 ~. ~. 2 - ~~ ~ ~. 24133 ~. ~ I- ~~ ~ ~. 241~ ~, ~. I - ~ ~ ~. 24135TM ~. I - ~ ~ ~. 24136~.~. 1-~~~. 24~7 ~. ~. I - ~o~ ~~ - ~sori~ D~~ I - ~ ~~ ~ - 698.1 ~ '2,519 - ~1~ A- ~ ~g AND FILE the abov~ ~ ~r~-ee ac~ed cm by ~he Planning C~,,,assion GA April 12, 1989. =HE PZANNING Gi~a~ISSIC~: ADO~u ~e Negative Declaraticm for Envi~a,en~al Assessment Nos. 33433, 33470, 33383, 33469, 33434, 33413, and. 33414 based on =he findings incorporated in ~he en~=al assesmnent and ~he c~nclusion ~hat the proposed projec~ will no~ have a significant effec~ on the envirurmmnt; and ESS: CO: gs AGENDA NO. 11A V~ NO' S 24131, 24132 24133, 24134, 24135, 24136 24137 April 19, 1989 Page 2 APPROVE) VESTING ~ ~uZT NO 24131/~g. NO. 1, subject to the attached c~x~itiicrm and based c~ the findings and c~mclusions '%no~o~ated in the Planning Ga,-.dssicm m/nutes dated April 12, 1989; and, ~ VESTING =~ZKTIVE TRACT NO. 24132 Amd. No. 1, subject to the attached c=mditiofis and based cm ~he findings and conclusions incorporated in the Plann/ng C~,.~issicm minutes dated April 12, 1989; and, APFROVE~ VESTM TMNEATIVE TRACT NO. 24133 A~d. No. 2, subject to the attached c~diti~ and based on the find/n. gs and conclusions incorporated in the Planning C~,..assicfi minutes dated April 12, 1989; and, APPENE3 VESTING T~EKTIVE TROT NO. 24134 ~md No. I subject to the attached c~nditicfis and based on the findings and conclusions incorporated in the P/anning C~,.,assion minutes dated April 12, 1989; and, APPROVe) VF2ZING ~N2ATIVE ~ NO. 24135 a~d No. 1, subject to the attached conditions and based on the findings and conclusions incorporated in the Planning C~issicn minutes dated April 12, 1989; and, APPENED VESTING ~ TRACT NO. 24136 a~d No. 1, subject to the attached ccnditiccs and based on the findings and conclusions incorpormted in the P/anning C~a~ssic~ m~nutes dated April 12, 1989; and~ inc~atad in the P~-nn~g Ccmmissicfi ~4~xtes dated ~ 12, 1989. '. .. RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING CONNISSION MINUTES APRIL 12, 1989 (AGENDA ITEH 5-4 - Reel 1025, Std~ I and 2 - Tapes No. 3A, '38, 4A) VESTING TRACT HAP NO. 24131 - EA 33433 - Bedford Properties - Rancho California Area -Ftrst $upervtsortal Dtstrtct- easterl~ of Nargartta Rd, southerly of Pauba lid - 441 lots - 105.4~ acres - SP Zone - Schedule A wtth VESTING TRACT HAP NO. 24132 - EA 33470 - 223 lots - 90.2~ acres - SP Zone - Schedule A and VESTZNG TRACT HAP NO. 24133 - EA 33383 - 693 lots - 163.7~ acres - SP. Zone - Schedule A and VESTING TRACT HAP NO. 24134 - EA 33469 - 310 lots - 91.2~ acres - SP Zone - Schedule A and VESTING TRACT KAP NO. 24135 - EA 33434 - 325 lots - 83.5~ acres - SP Zone - Schedule A and VESTING TRACT HAP NO. 24136 - EA 33413 - 400 lots - f§.8~ acres - SP Zone - Schedule A and VESTING TRACT HAP NO. 24137 - EA 33414 - 147 lots - 64.3~ acres - SP Zone - Schedule A Hearings were opened at 3:30 p.m. and were closed at 4:19 p.m. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adoption of the Negatlve Declaration for EA Nos. 33433, 33470, 33383, 33469, 33434, 33413, and 33414 and approva~ of Testing Tentative Tract Nos. 24131 Amended No. 1, 24132 Amended No. 2, 24133 Amended No. 1, 24134 Amended No. 1, 24135 Amended No. 1, 24136 Amended No. 1, and 24137 Amended No. 1 based on the findtngs and conclusions listed In the staff report. Staff advised that the vesttng tracts are to implement the western portion of The P s Meadows Specific Plan (S 219), whtch ~ located east of Margar~ta Road, west of Butterfte~d Stage Road, north of Htghway 79 and south of Pauba Road. The proposal ts to subdivide approximately 698.1 acres into 2,529 restdentta~ lots and 100 open space lots/school sttes. Zontng on site ts SP. Surrounding zoning ts SP, R-R, R-A, R-a-2~, R-A-5, A-1-10 and C-P-S. The site consists of ro}11ng terratn except for the southern portion which ts flat, and ts vacant wtth the exception of a portion of Vesttn9 Tract 24137, which has some percolatton ponds. The site had been used for dry farming where topography penMtted. The site is located near other adopted Spectfic Plans such as Vat1 Ranch (SP 223) and Redhawk (SP 217) to the south, as we31 as approved tracts to the east. The proposed deve~opnent conlores wtth the residential clanstries and destgn standards of the speclftc p~an. Vesttn9 Tract 24131 wt]1 dtvtde 105.4 acres lnto 440 single famtllf lots, wtth 13 open space lots, and was ended for a mtnor redestgn of the tract to facilitate circulation. Vesttn9 Tract 24132, Amended No. 2 proposes to dtvtde 30.2 acres Into 214 stngle faintly lots wtth 11 Junior h gh school stte. The tssue open space lots Including an elementary and of slope stability was a-concern of all the tracts and ms revtewed b,~ the County Geologist. Vesting Tract 24133 proposes to dtvtde 163.7 acres into 693 stngle faintly lots and 23 open space lots and has an extenshe paseo system whtch links to an acttve recreation area. The Ftre Department was concerned about internal-circulation and worked to avoid cutting through the paseo area. The cross secttbns of the greenbelt/paseo area ts on file. Vesting Tract 24134 proposes to dtvtde 91.2 acres tnto 311 stngle famtl~ lots and 19 open space lots, which tncluded a 2.5 acre lot for a day care center. Vesttrig Tract Nap 24135 proposes to dtvtde 83.5 acres tnto 325 stngle famtly lots and 19 open space lots. 'Vesting Tract Nap 24136 proposes to divide 99.8 acres tnto 400 41 RZVERSZDE COUNTY PLANNING COle4ISSTON MINUTES APRIL 12, 1989 single famtly lots and 8 open space lots. There tsa htstortc site on this map and on Tract 24137 and a letter on this site was incorporated within the staff report. All concerns have been resolved. Tract 24137 proposes to divide 64.3 acres tnto 146 stngle famtly lots, a 9.1 acre commercial lot and 7 open space lots. A liquefaction study ms prepared for thts tract and was revtewed by the County Geologist to hts satisfaction. Staff modtfted the conditions of approval as follows: Condttton-tB-e for Tracts 24133, 24134, 24135 and 24137: "Trash bins, loadtng areas and Incidental storage areas located In recreation areas shall be located away and vtsually screened from surrounding areas with the use of block walls and landscaping." Condition 18-f amended to read "bike access to recreation areas." ConditiOn 21 to be replaced by standard language for the property owners association maintaining the common areas rather than the strict CSA requirements. Condition 26-a shall be deleted since none of the tract areas are in the study area for the Stephens Kangaroo Rat or within the known occupied habitat. Condition 26-c should be modified to read: Prior to issuance of butldtn~ rather than grading pemtts. Condition 29 should be added to all the tracts, referring to the CEQA monitoring of the mitigation measures. ComtSsloner Beadling said that there is 100 acres either for schools or open space. She asked tf they took the school sites out, how much open space would they have. Staff advised that there are 243 acres devoted to recreation and open space outside of the school sites. Commissioner Beadltng asked whether there was a provision for a clubhouse, and staff advised that there are plans for recreation centers within the plan. Staff will recetve plot plans for the open space areas. Lee Johnson, Road Department, advised that item No. 4 for Tract 24133 should be amended to read4_~66 instead of 44/66. TESTIMONY OF PROPONENT: Mike Ryan, Bedford Properties, 27405 Ynez Road, Rancho California, said that they concur with the staff report and all conditions of approval except for one. He said-that the condition appears in all the tracts. They would ltke added to item 16 of the Road Department letter dated March 7, 1989 "or as approved by the Road Commissioner." Mr. Johnson concurred with that proposed amendment. 42 RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING CO!~ISSION MINUTES APRIL 12, 1989 TESTXFIONY OF OPPONENTS*: Felix Probandt, P, O,Box 1150, Tenecula, said that all his comments related to the tssue of wastewater disposal, tn particular, the Eastern Fiuntctpal Water Dtstrtct/Rancho California Mater Reclamation Factltty (hereafter called the Eastern Sewer Plant). He had hts assistant present a sertes of transparencies which Fir. Probandt used to illustrate his potnts. His residence ts located at 43789 Rendova Place. FIr. Probandt satd that the transparencies are generally of documents~hat the Commissioners have already received, and he emphasized the tnformat)on found In those documents. Fir. Probandt satd that the conditions of approval tnclude a condftton that the environmental assessment shall utilize the evaluation of impacts addressed in the EIR prepared 'for Specific Plan No. 219. Under 'impacts" the information was provided that the project will generate approximately 1.81 million gallons per day average peak dry weather sewage flow, and that the peak dry weather sewage flow is estimated to be 3.08 million gallons per day to be treated by the Eastern Sewage Plant. Another document states that the site lies within the Jurisdictions of the Rancho California Water District and the Eastern Fiunicipal Water District. He said that Eastern, not Rancho, will provide sewer service. The San 53 letter has remarks which state that prior to the first LDC, the attached requested information is to be introduced to the E.H.S. The Health letter dated August 9, 1988 to the Rancho California Water District discussed the "will service" letter. He noted that a typical response to a Health Department letter was 'yes" to the question of whether there was adequate capacity. Eastern Fiunicipal Water District's response to a 'will serve" letter has a statement that 'service might be precluded by the San Diego Region Water Quality Control Board.' A second copy of a San 53 has the statement that sewer may require off site sewer facilities subject to the treatment plant capacity of the San Diego Regional Water quality Control Board. The San Diego Water Board's Order No. 88-94 had to do with discharge specifications and certain difficulties Eastern was experiencing in discharging which was in violation of the 'basin plan' as well as capacity. Order No. 88-101 was issued for a time schedule for the Eastern ~nictpal Water District to rectify the problems. He said because of the agreement with Camp Pendleton and the Rancho Dtstrictm Eastern is being allowed three3~ars to work out the violations, but they can only go to three million a day, and in order to be -able to discharge three million gallons, they mst comply with certain report dates for the next three years. The report concludes that Eastern shall submit to the Regional Board on or before each compliance date a Report of Compliance or Noncompliance with each task. The last page was a table which indicated that the tracts average peak sewage flow comes to 0,788mtllion gallons a day (FIGD). He pointed out that water is introduced to this flow to dilute it. The monthly reportShows an average 04'2,260 million gallons by the end of February, ~th a maxtmmn of 2.423 MGD. He said that under the present operating status of the Eastern Water District, there is no reasonable assurance that Eastern will be able to treat and discharge the wastewater flows coming out of the subject tracts for which environmental assessments are in question. 43 RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES APRIL 12, 1989 Mr. Probandt satd that EIR 235 for SP 2%9 was defective because Information that could not have been known at the ttme of the [XR was certified as complete. The San D{ego Regional Board Orders and the action by the Rancho California Board and the Patinas all took place subsequent to the October 1988 Board of $uperrlsors approval of the subject EIR. No negative declaration can be Issued hcause there extsts substantial evtdence that each project or tract tn question may have a significant effect on the environment. The revtew process presented was In violation of due process and that the pertinent agency (the Department of Health) did not follow lts o~n rules In the approval process. Con~ntsstoner Beadltng said that what was basically betng said ts that the plant ts at capactty now and thts project cannot be Included. Mr. Probandt satd that Eastern Is tn violation of the bastn plan. The keter code of the State of California has a 11st of rules'which allows any member of the public to protest an order of the Board. One of the procedures was to protest to the State Water Resources Board. He said that by the t(me thts project ts built, he didn't beqteve that he can be assured that the project wtll not be tn violation of the 3 NGD. Conntsstoner Beadling asked whose responsibility this Mr. Vtckers said that Eastern indicated that they had the capacity and would serve these tracts. Cmtsstoner Beadling noted that from what Mr. Probandt ts saying, Eastern cannot provtde the capacity. Mr. Vtckers said that that statement could be subject to a dispute by Eastern. They cannot sit tn Judgment of whether or not Eastern ts or ts not tn violation. That tssue would have to be heard tn San Dtego before the Water qualtty Control Board down there. What the developer has ts a letter from Eastern Municipal saying that there ts capacity. Mr. Vtckers advised that they should not be substituting their Judgment for etther Eastern or the Water qualtty Control Board over whether or not there ts capacity. Comtssloner Purvtance satd that he dtd not believe that thts was tn the purvtew of the Conntsston, to check whether there are proper assurances from the proper agencies. However, tf the San Dtego ~QCB say that Eastern Is persisting In vtolatlng the bastn plan, It would seem as tf the WQCB has the power to tssue a cease and destst order which would prohtbtt them from allowing more hookups or whatever other actton they choose to take. Coazntssloner Iresson satd that there ts a Hello Roos tn that area, but he did not know tf part of that dlstrtct ~as for the development of a sewage plant. He felt that Eastern has a obligation when they wrote thetr letter saying that they have capacity, ahd the Cemtsston has to constder that Eastern will do tt. If Eastern gets additional capactt , there ts no problem; tf not, then Eastern and the developer ~111 have a problem. The Commission has to go b~ what docmentatfon Is ghen the. Mr. Probandt satd that he ~as a11egtng that the developer cannot get capactty because of Eastern's own statements. He satd that what he was trytrig to show 44 / RZVERSZDE COUNTY PLANNZNG COHHZSSZON HZNUTES APRIL 12, 1989 Wtth the transparencies of the documents ls that the statement fram the Health Department has e "yes" check for capacity, but that does not man anything. k/hat does man something is the letter Eastern sent dated 12-19-88 which states that "servtce mtght be precluded by IIQCB-Si)." Nr. Probehalt satd that tf thts project develops further, Eastern w~ll testif that this ts not a binding conwnttment, and ts not a contract to serve. ~he potnt he ts saytrig ts that the developer cannot get a negative declaration tf there exists substantial evidence that the project, in thts case the tracts, wtll have a significant environmental tmpact. Therefore, he was presenting the Information in that context. Nr. Vtckers asked tf sewage was a part of Specific'Plan 219 and E/R 235 and were mitigation measures a part of that. Staff advised that it was. Fir. Vickers pointed out that added to the conditions today .were conditions regarding environmental monitoring and recording. Cmwnissioner Beadling said that she was concerned that the developer w~ll grade the land, then find that he cannot build. What they will end up ~th ts land that has been disturbed and ts subject to eroston. Nr. Probandt satd that he roved onto his property after the Board approved the specific plan. He would have been at these heartngs before this, had he moved into the area earlier. He ts tr~ng to establish evidence that these tracts my have a significant tmpact on the environment. tn order to get this problem resolved. Nr. Vickers said that the environmental findings tn the EIR address the ~ssue of sewage and the mitigation of that problem. He noted that a condition ms added today for monitoring and reporting, and advised that the development could be stopped at various stages if it ts not at the right level. ConTntssioner Purrlance satd that he dtd not belteve tt was the Commisston's role to make the detemtnatton that Nr. Probandt wants. Whether or not the developer ts followtdg the requirements of the Regtonal Idatar Qualtty Control is between the developer and that agency. Nr. Probandt reiterated that this ~s an environmental assessment that ts betng considered and the Commission cannot tssue a negative declaration under these circumstances based on substantial evidence that this project my affect the environment. Commissioner Purrlance advised that County Counsel ts saylng that the plan calls for these thtngs to be mitigated and that the conditions have been Ended so the project ts monitored. Therefore, the negative.declaration ts perfectly legal. The beartng ms closed st 4:19 p,m. FZNDZFiGS AND CONCLUSIONS: Seven Tentathe VeSttng Tract Nos. 24131, 24132, 24133, 24134, 24135, 24136 and 24137 have been submitted; the subject tracts are located enttrely ~thtn adopted S dftc Plan No. 219; the seven vesttng tracts have been destgned to the development standards of Adopted Specific Plan !~o. 219; Environmental hsessment Nos. 33433, 33470, 33469, 33434, 33413, end 33414, based on the flndtngs of Environmental impact Report No. 235, prepared for $pectfic Plan No. 219, tndtcate that the environmental trapacts can be avotded or mitigated to an acceptable level, except for cumulative Atr Quallty ~mpacts, ~htch cannot be fully mitigated; a statement of Overriding Ftndtngs 45 RIVERSZDE COUNTY PLANNZNG CONJ"4ZSSZON HINUTES APRZL 12, 1989 for cumulative Air Qualtty tmpacts was approved by the Board of Supervisors on October 4, 1988; and, Development Agreement No. 4 has been recorded for Spectfic Plan No. 219. The proposed tracts conform to Spectftc Plan No. 219; conform to the requirements of Ordinance Nos. 348 and 460; based on the environmental determination made tn Environmental Assessment Nos. 33433, 33470, 33383, 33469, 33434, 33413, and 33414, the subject vestlng tracts will not have a significant effect on the environment, wtth the exception of cumulative Air Qualtty tmpacts which caqnot be fully mitigated; ands the ahovo r-'erenced Envt~onmentaq Assessments include the Statement-of Overriding Ftndtngs for cumulative A(rQualtty tmpacts approved by the Boar of Supervisors on October 4, 1988, therefore, the envtromnental tmpacts have been mitigated to an acceptable level through project destgn and the conditions of approval, NOTION: Upon morton by Commissioner Bresson, seconded by Cgnmissioner Beadling and unanimously carried, the Commission adopted the Negative Declarations for EA Nos. 33433, 33470, 33383, 33469, 33434, 33413 and 33414 and approved Tentative Tracts No. 24131 Amended No. 1, 24132 Amended No. 2, 24133 Amended No. 1, 24133 Amended No. 1, 24134 Amended No. 1, 24135 Amended No. 1, 24136 Amended No. 1, and 24137 Amended No. 1 subject to the amended conditions of approval and based on the above findings and conclusions. In answer to Commissioner Bresson, Nr. Vtckers advised that on the previous item, the Development Agreement was in place. These are new vesting maps within the Specific Plan. 46 Zoning Area: Rancb~ ~ ~ ~ ~ornia Supervisorial District: First E.A. Number: 33433, 33470, 33383, 33469, 33434, 33413, 33414 Specific Plan Section Vesting Tract Nos.: 24131 Amenc~ent No. 1 24132 ;i~enc~nent No. 2 24133 Amendment No. 1 24134 A~endment No. 1 24135 A~en~ent No. 1 24136 Amendment No. 1 24137 Amendment No. 1 Planning C~mm~ission: 4-12-89 /~3en~a Iten No.: 5-4 1. Applicant: 2. Engineer: Pabert Bein, William Frost & Associates 3. Type of Rec/uest: To subdivide 698.1 acres into seven vesting r ~'~5~,~ (24131, 24132, 24133, 24c~~413 24136, and 24137) 2,529 residential lots and 100 open space lots/school sites. 4. Location: The tracts are located within the Meadows Specific P/an [No. 219). The site is in the State Highway 79 corridor in the Rancho California area of Southwestern Riverside County. Specifically, the subject tracts are located east of MargBrita Rd. and west of Butterfield Stage Rd., ~tely north of Highway 79, and south of Pauba P~. 5. Existing Zone: 6. Surrounding Zoning: SP, R-R, R-A, R-A-2 1/2, R-A-5, A-l-10, C-P-S 7. Site (haracteristics: ~he site of the subject trac~s ocmsists of rolling terrain except for the southern portion of the site, which is flat. '~he site ~ been used for dry farming Mbere the ~y permitted. With the exoeption of percolation prods on a portion of Vesting Tract 24137, ~11 of the site is vacant. St~ff Report Ves=/ng TraCe Nos. 24131/~nded No. 1 24132 ~Bnded No. 2 24133 ~r~k~a No. 1 24134/~ended No. 1 24135 ~mended No. 1 24136 ~mended No. 1 24137 ammded No. I Page 2 8. Area Characteristics: e 10. Land Division Da~a: · he seven subject vesting tracts are located in Southwestern Paverside County in the Rancho California area. ~he tracts are near c~.her adDUced S~ecific P/arts, such as Vail Ranch (Specific Pl-n 223) and Redhawk (Specific Plan 217) to the South as well as approved ~racts to the east. LAND USE: ~rk~ted Specific Plan No. 219 CGRR~SPCN3ING SIN~. FA~n.¥ ACREAGE PIANNING AREAS IOTS 24131 A~d. No. I 105.4 24132 A~d. No. 2 90.2 24133 A~d. No. i 163.7 24134 An~. No. I 91.2 (~4135 A~d. ~k~. 1}{83.5 24136 A~d. No. I 99.8 24137 ATe. No. i 64.3 15, 22 440 30, 31, 32 214 16, 19, 20, 21 693 18, 33, 34 311 1,p 8 400 1, 2-a 146 698.1 Tract No. 24131 .knerdnent. No. I ~eelth Flood ConV_rol: Fir~ ~ U~L: ~,~la~ng and Safety: 3-07-89 3-20-89 3-27-89 2-27-89 1-18-89 4-14-89 Ce~ SPACE CCM~RCT~L 1DTS/SCH00L 1DTS SITES 0 13 0 11 0 23 0 19 0 ~D 0 8 I 7 2,529 I 100 See letters dated: Tract No. 24132 ~mencb~Yc No. 2 "' 'Road De~er~uent: 3-06-89 ~ealth Depa~U,~..l;: 3-20-89 Flood C0rfczol: 3-24-89 Fire Del::a~U~=r. aL: 3-21-89 Bn~-l,it~g and Safety: 3-06-89 Revised ~oad De~C: 4-17-89 Vesting Tract Nos. 24131 anended No. 1 24132 ~mended No. 2 24133/~ended No. 1 24134 Amended No. 1 24135/~ended N~.. 1 24136 ]~nerK~d ~o. 1 24137/~ended No. i Page 3 Tract No. 24133 A~endnen= No. I Flood O3ntroh Fire De~uU~ent: Building and Safety: 3-06-89 2-27-89 3-27-89 2-24-89 3-06-89 4-17-89 Tract No. 24135 Amencknent No. i oad DeparU nt: H~th DeparUmnt: Flood Control: Fire ~ h,ent: Building and Safety: Revised Road Dell.: 3-06-89 2-27-89 3-27-89 2-24-89 3-06-89 4-12-89 Tract No. 24137 ~nendment No. I Tract No. 24134 Amendment No. I Me~th De~t: Flood Control: Fire Dep~U~ent: Buil_a~ng and Safety: 3-06-89 3-20-89 3-27-89 2-24-89 3-06-89 4-17-89 Tract No. 24136 ;m~ncknent No. i Road Dep~U,ent: Heal~_h DeparUnent: Flood Control: Fire Depa~U~ant: Buil~ ng and Safety: Revised Road .Dept.: 3-06-89 2-27-89 3-27-89 2-24-89 3-06-89 4-12-89 Road Depa~h,ent: Hea.lt, h DeparUmnt: Flood Control: Fire DeparUmnt: Building and Safety: County Geologist: 3-07-89 2-27-89 3-27-89 2-24-89 3-06-89 1-30-89 4-12-89 Seven Vesting Tentative Trac~s ba~e been filed within adopted Specific Plan No. 219 ~he ~e~_dow~). Vesting Tentative Tract No. 24131 proposes to divide 453 lots c~ 105.4 acres. Vestin~ Tentative Tract No. 24132 will divide 214 lots c~ 90.2 a~s. In the interior of the ,~rec4fic plan, Vesting Tract No. 24133 c~msists of 716 lots c~ 163.7 a~s. Vesting Tract No. 24134, located in the northwest corner of the ,~pec~{c Plan area, will divide 91.2 acres into 330 lots. vesting Tract ' the western most Nortim of the Specific Plan, includes ~4' Vesting Tract N0. 24136 will divide 99.8 acres into 408 lots. Fir~lly, Vesting Tract No. 24137, in the south~ern Nortic~ of the Specific P]~n adjacent to Highway 79, proposes to divide 64.3 ac~s into 154 lots. Staff Report Vesting =Tact Nos. 24131 a~ended No. 1 24132 Amended No. 2 24133/%~ended No. 1 24134/%~ended No. 1 24135/~mmx~d No. 1 24136 ~ No. 1 24137/~ended No. I Page 4 Back~m~d Specific Plea No. 219, adopted by the Board of Supervisors c~ October 4, 1988, includes 5,611 chell/ng units cm 1389 acres. ~%e seven tracts implement the western portic~ of the Specific Plan. Envircmmental Impact Report No. 235 assessed the full rBnge of envirurzental concerns associated with the Specific Plan. All identified potential ix~zects, except for cumulative effects cm air quality, were reduced to an acceptable level throug~ mitigaticm measures incorporated into the project, conditions of approvB/end pro~ect design. The envircrmBntal impact report is the basis for the envircrmmntal assesm~ents for the subject tracts. Environmental Assessment Nos. 33433, 33470, 33383, 33469, 33434, 33413, and 33414 indicated that all potential impacts for the tracts can be mitigated to an acceptable level. Project Consistenc~ with }rk~ted Specific Plan The subject tracts were thoroughly reviewed for consistency with ~bpted Specific Plan No. 219. The residential densities and layout confozm to the ~.~nd Use Plan. l~ttin~, as shown on the tract maps, will aco~,.,~date the zoning provisions of the zcming ord/nance adopted in conjunction with the Specific Plan. =he vesting tract maps and corres~c~i.ng conditions of in Section III.B of the Specific P/an. Issues dealt with at the design stage of the tracts have included internal r-~mlation within the tracts, mitigation of historic resouroes, and geologic issues. Firstly, interna/~4~-c-l~tion was a c~mcern in ~1'1 of the tracts under ooasideraticm, exoM~ for Vesting Tract No. 24137. ~hese c~noerrm were worked out thrcug~ minor zedesign. ~e second issue was the mitigation of historic resources, ~ich wes discussed extensi%~ly betwee~ the a~plicant and the Oounty Parks De~e~U.~.t. _It ~as ~eteunined that the h~--toric resources within the tracts under oormideration could be adequately mitigated. FiD~l]y, geologic oc~c~-~ included liquefaction for Vestin~ Tract 24137 and slope stability for w l 1 of the tracts. Reports were prepered on each issue and li~uefactic~ -~ssue for Tract 24137 are presented in a-letter ~ated 1-30-89. With regard to slope stabih'ty, the Geologist fou~ that the reo~.-~.daticas of the reports were acceptable and should be incorporated into the development and constructic~ of the tracts. Staff Report Vesting Tract Nos. 24131 Rmended No. 1 24132 Amended No. 2 24133 amended No. 1 24134/%~ended No. 1 24135/~ended No. 1 24136/~en~ed No. 1 24137/~-de~ No. I Page 5 1. Seven Tentative Vesting Tract Nos. 24131, 24132, 24133, 24134, 24135, 24136, and 24137 have been suhnit~ced. 2. ~he subject tracts are located entirely within adopted Specific Plan No. 219. 3. The seven vesting tracts have been designed to ~ development stan~ds of Adopted Specific Plan No. 219. ~W--v~m~tal Assessment Nos. 33433, 33470, 33383, 33469, 33434, 33413, and 33414, based on the findings of En~tal Impact .Report No. 235, prepared for Specific P/an No. 219, indicate that the envirormental impacts can be a~oided or mitigated to an acoeptable level, ey~ept for cmmalative Air ~ity impacts, which cannot be fully mitigated. A statenent of Overriding Findings for cumulative Air Quality impacts was approved by the Board of Supervisors on 0c~Ober 4, 1988. 5. Develo[ment ]~Frmmnt No. 4 ~-~ been recorded for Specific Plan No. 219. 1. The proposed tracts cc~fom to Specific Plan No. 219. 2. The proposed vesting tacts 348 and 460. o~%fonn to the requ~,ents of ~ce No. Nos. 33433, 33470, 33383, 33469, 33434, 33413, and 33414, the subject ~ tracts w/l/not have a signifi_~nt effect on the emF~mmt, with ~he exceg~im of cumxlative Air ~ality i~ ~hic~ _~_nnot be fully Staterant of O~uilm'g Fi.a~ngs for ~-~,~-~ve Air Quality impacts .a~proved by the Board of S~Tvlsors on October 4, 1988. /~A-x~x~ of a Negative De~l~at3rm for Envi~a~al Assessment Nos. 33433, 33470, 33383,. 33469, 33434, 33413, and 33414 based on the findir~ that the project design and the c~r~i~ of a~=ovaZ~ and~ APFENAL of Vesting Tentative Tract No. 24131 ~ No. 1, subject to the atecached ccalditicms of apprmml; and, S~aff Report Vesting Tract Nos. 24131 a~_nded No. 1 24132/~ended No. 2 24133/~ended No. 1 24134 amend No. 1 24135/%mended No. 1 24136/~em3ed No. 1 24137/~na~y~ No. I Page 6 of Vesthl Tentative Tract No. 24132 )amnded coB.d.i.tt x,. of and, No. 2, subject to the ~ of Vesting Tentative Tract attached cc~ditiorm of approvB/~ and, No. 24133/~endedNo. 1, subject to the of Vesting Tentative Tract No. 24134 A~mded No. 1, subject to the conditions of approve; and, APP)OVAL of Vesting Tentative Tract No. 24135 Amended No. 1, subject to the attached conditions of appxval; and, APPEVAL of Vesting Tentative Tract No. 24136 Amended No. 1, subject to the attached conditions of approval; and, APPEXrAL of Vesting Tentative Tract No. 24137 Amended No. 1, subject to the attached conditions of approval. CO:cj ;C.A.T-TERED · \. VAC RANCH "~. r \,~ I~p. BEDFORD PROPERT E I · Use 2529 LOTS I S ( Atel RANCHO CALIF lit $up. Dbt ,-~,m r ' Sec. 8 T. 8 S.,R.2W Auesser's Ik. 923 Pg. 23' ' -. Circulation HIGHWAY (~ EXP VAR .-:.:lfiT. g'~iii. RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTHENT SUBDIVISION CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 24135 AHENDED NO. I STANDARD CONDITIONS The su~dlvtder shall defend, indemnify, and hold hamless the County of Riverside, its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the County of Riverside or its agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the County agencie p al beards or legislative body of Riverside, its advisory ~2c~ concerning Vesting Tentative Tract 3~ No. I which action Amended is brought about within the time period provided for in California Government Code Section 6649g.37. The County of Riverside will promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the County of Riverside and will cooperate fully in the defense. If the County fails to promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the subdivider shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the County of Riverside. The tentative subdivision shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Nap Act and to all the requirements of Ordinance 460, Schedule A, unless modified by the conditions listed below. This conditionally approved tentative map will expire two years after the County of Riverside Board of Supervisors approval date, unless extended as provided by Ordinance 460. The final map shall be prepared by a licensed land surveyor subject to all the requirements of the State of California Subdivision Nap Act and Ordinance 460. The subdivider shall submit one copy of a soils report to the Riverside County Surveyor's Office and two copies to the Department of Butlding and Safety. The report shall address the sotls stability and geological conditions of the site. · If any grading is proposed, the subdivider shall submit one print of a comprehensive grading plan to the Department of Building and Safety. The plan shall comply with the Uniform Building Code, Chapter 70, as amended by Ordinance 457 and as may be additionally provided for in these conditions of approval. TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 24135, Condl tl ons of Approval Page 2 7. A grading pemit shall be obtained from the Department of Building and Safety prior to commencement of any grading outside of county maintained road right of way. 8. Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid prior to recoraation of time final map. 9. The subdivider shall comply with the street improvement recommendations outlinT~d in the Riverside County ROao Department's letter clated i-6-tigs 4-12-89 a copy of which is attached. (Amended - Plannin~ Commission - April 12, 1989) 10. Legal access as required by Ordinance 460 shall be provided from the tract map boundary to a County maintained road. 11. All road easements shall be offered for dedication to the public and shall continue i n force until the governi n9 body accepts or abandons such offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the Road Commissioner. Street names shall be subject to approval of the Road Conmnissioner. 12. Easements, when required for roadway ~lopes, drainage facilities, utilities, etc., shall be shown on the final map if they are located within the land division boundary. All offers of dedication and conveyances shall be submitted and recorded as directed by the County Surveyor. 13. Water and sewera9e disposal facilities shall be installed in accordance with the provisions set forth in the Riverside County health Department's letter dated 2-27-89 a copy of which is attached. 14. The subdivider shall comply with the flood control recommendations outlined by the Riverside County Flood Control District's letter eated 3-27-89 a copy of which is attached. If the land division lies within an adopted flood control drainage area pursuant to Section 10.25 of Ordinance 460, appropriate fees for the construction of area drainage facilities shall be collected by the Road Comissioner. 15. The subdi vider shal 1 comply with the fi re improvement recommenaations outlined in the County Fire Marshal's letter dated 2-24-8g, a copy of which is attached. 16. Subdivision phasing, including any proposed common open space area improvement phasing, if applicable, shall be subject to Planning Department approval. Any proposed phasing shall provide for adequate vehicular access to all lots in each phase, and shall substantially confore to the intent and purpose of the subdivision approval. T~TATZVE TRACT NO. 24135, Amd. tl Conditions of Approval Page 3 19. The subdivider and all successors in interest shall comply with the provisions of Development Agreement No. 4 and Spectfic Plan No. 219. a) b) Lots created by this subdivision shall comply with the following: All lots shall have a minimum size of 5,000 square feet. CorNer lots and through lots, if any, shall be provided with additional area pursuant to Section 3.BB of Ordinance 460 and so as not to contain less net area than the least amount of net area in non-corner and non-through lots. c} Lots created by this subdivision shall be in conformance with the development standards of the Specific Plan zone. d) Graded but undeveloped land shall be maintained condition and shall be either planted with interim provided with other erosion control measures as Director of Building and Safety. in a weed-free landscaping or approved by the e) Trash bins, loading areas and incidental storage areas, located in recreation areas shall be located away and visually screened from surrounding areas with the use of block walls and landscaping. (Amended - Planning Commission - April 12, 198g) f) Bike racks and bike lockers in sufficient quantity shall be provided in convenient locations to facilitate bike access to the pFe~eet area recreation areas. (Amended - Planning Commission - April 12, 1989) Prior to RECORDATION of the final map the following conditions shall be satisfied: Prior to the recordation of the final map the applicant shall submit written clearances to the Riverside County Road and Survey Department that all pertinent requirements outlined in the attached approval letters from the following agencies have been met: County Fire Department County Flood Control County Health Department County Parks Department A property owners' association with the unqualified right to assess the owners of the individual units for reasonable maintenance costs shall be' established and continuously maintained. The association shall have the right to lien the property of the owners who default in the payment of their assessments. Such lien shall not be subordinate to any encumbrance other than a first deed of trust provided such deed of trust is made in good faith and for value and is of record prior to the lien of the association. TENTATIVE TRACT N0. 24135. And. #1 Condttfons of Approval Page 4 Pree~ Io eeeePdat~ee of like rifle; mF~ like sebd~vCde~ skall eeflvey leo tile enweeeitded~ end easemeRlin eMoepS Shone easemeats wheels 4n SIne se~e d~seiteSeee of the GeMely eFe eooepSab;ev As eendiSeens pFesedenS te the Geeely aseepS~eg S~S:;e So seek areasT the swbdev~deF she;1 swbm~S She fe;lew~e9 dosemoons ~e ~he P~ann~n9 QepaF~me,& ~eF Pev&ewT ~eh deswmee~s sha;~ be swb~ee~ te She aFpFeva; of tha~ depaplmen~ and She effuse e~ She Geeely Gewnse~+ ½~ A desioitaS~en of neveRsells neediS&oRs and eesSr&eS~ens~ and ;~ A sampie desomenS conveying S441e Se She peltshanson ef an ~ndiv~det; eend~S~ens afld PenSinVeStoRs ts ~neeitpeitaSed Siseite~n by eefeiteneev The des;atelieR ef neveRaRSon oendiS~ees end eesSit.~S~ens submiSSed ireview ski:;1 ~a~ pitevade felt a SeFm ef 6g yeainns ~b½ pitevade flit She esSib~.iekmenS of a ~epe,Sy e~eits: assesiaSCee eempw~sed of tile e~ews of each ¢ndiv~dea~ let e~ unit and ~e½ sendsin ~ise fe~lewen9 pitsvisions TIle pFeFeFSy ewne~s~ asses~aSCen esSabl~sised ke~e~n sisalis 4f deansneT be seS~vaSeds by 4eeeitpepaSeen nit eSiseFw~ses aS She reqeesS of She Geeely Of R~veits~des end liise prepsFly ewneFe~ asses&aS~en ska~; demands t~S;e So el; ev any pains of the AeelFInoR awea~s meFe prepeitSy ownnits'- asses~aS~en and She decision So eeqeeite SISal She asseseaSeee enSende. S&enaliy sesepS t&Sle leo the zeeenen area-' ska;1 be aS She se:;e d~seiteS&en of She ;eaRly of Rivestinder ;e ~ke evens likes eke ewemen seeaT er eey FoPS likeneels 4s eeeveyed leo ewe gush ~emen 'eeea-'s ska;1 enRage and eeeS~eeeesly ma(.nSa~n soots like r~gisS leo essese 4he eweeFs of eesk 4ede. vtdeal -tel ef sees ~ep tile Peasenab:in less of maenSoeneflg sueis Aimrimes eeeo-'v led ski:;:; have SIne r~gisS So l~efl liise prepewly Of any seek eweell echo dellells ~n the eFealed? skal; be prier lie ol; eSker ~ees eeeeFded subsequelS leo tile TEHTATIVE TRACT N0. 24135, Amd. #1 Conditions of Approval Page 5 ;kis 9es~aFa&ien skeW4 nob be ~eenieaSeds ~subsSanSia~y~ amemded oF pwepew~y deaneeNed SheFe~wem absen~ She pp~eP ww~SSen sensen& ~e~ She P;ann~ng D~Feelew e~ ~ke Geun&y ~f R~veFs~de eF &ke Geun~y~s sueeesseF-(n-tn&eFesST A pFepesed amendmen& she;; be eeesideFed. ~subs&anSCa~z 4~ 4~ a~ee&s ;,ke eNSeeSs usage eFma~eSenanee e~ ~ke !eeRgReR aPeBIT ;~ &ke evens e~ any eee~;~s~ beSween ~k~s 9es~aFa~en end ~ke Av~s~es e~ .;neeFpereSienT lke ByTawsT eF eke FPepeF~y ewneFs~ asses~a&~e, Ru~es and Rege~a~iees~ 4~ seys ~k&s 9es~aFa&ien skeW4 eee&Fe~,~ enee app~eved~ eke dee;aFa&~en 64 sevenanSh send~&~ens and Fes~F~e&~e~s ska~ be veeeFded e& &ke same ~me ~ka& &ke ~na~ map 4s ~eseFded, (Deleted - Planning Commission - April 12, 1989) Prior to recordatton of the final subdivision map, the subdivider shall submit the following documents to the Planning Department for review, which documents shall be subject to the approval of that department and the Office of the County Counsel: 1) A declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions; and 2) A sample document conveying title to the purchaser of an individual lot or unit which provides that the declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions is incorporated therein by reference. The declaration of covenants,* conditions and restrictions submitted for review shall (a) provide for a minimum term of 60 years, (b) provide for the establishment of a property owners' association comprised of the owners of each individual lot or unit, (c) provide for ownership of the common area by either the property owners' association or the owners of each individual lot or unit as tenants in common and {d) contain the following provisions verbatim: "Notwithstanding any provision in this Declaration to the contrary, the following provision shall apply: continuously mantatn particularly described as lots A through V on Vesting l)act Hap No. 24135 Amended No. i attached hereto, and shall not sell or transfer the 'consnon area', or any part thereof, absent the prior written consent of the Planning Director of the County of Riverside or the County's successor-in-interest. The property owners' association shall have the right to assess the owners of each individual lot or unit for the reasonable cost of maintaining the 'common area' and shall have the right to lien the TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 24135, And. Conditions of Approval Page 6 property of any such owner who defaults in the payment of a maintenance assessment. An assessment lien, once created, shall be prior to all other liens recorded subsequent to the notice of assessment or other document creating the assessment lien. This Declaration shall not be terminated, 'substantially' amended or property deannexed therefrom absent the prior written consent of the Planning Director of the County of Riverside or the County's successor-in-interest. A proposed amendment shall be considered 'substantial' if it affects the extent, usage or maintenance of the 'common area '. In the event of any conflict between this Declaration and the Articles of Incorporation, the Bylaws or the property owners' association Rules and regulations, if any, this Declaration shall control." Once approved, the declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions shall be recorded at the same time that the final map is recorded. (Added - Planning Connlsslon - April 12, 198g) The developer shall comply with the following parkway landscaping conditions: 1} Prior to recordatton of the final map the developer shall file an application with the County for the formation of or annexation to, a parkway maintenance district for Vesting Tentative Tract No. 24135 Amended No. I in accordance with the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, unless the project is within an existing parkway maintenance di strict. 2) Prior to the issuance of building permits, the developer shall secure approval of proposed landscaping and irrigation plans from the County Road and Planning Department. All landscaping and irrigation plans and specifications shall be prepared in a reproducible format suitable for permanent filing with the County Road Department. 3) The developer shall post a landscape performance bend which shall be released concurrently with the release of subdivision performance bends, guaranteeing the vlabiltty. of all landscaping which will be installed prior to the assumption of the maintenance responsibility by the district. 4) The developer, the developer's successors-in-interest or assignees, shall be responsible for all parkway landscaping maintenance until such time as maintenance is taken over by the district. 5) The developer shall comply with the standards and exhibits in Specific Plan No. 219. TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 24135, Amd. #1 Conditions of Approval Page 7 23. The developer shall be responsible for maintenance and ~pkeep of all slopes, landscaped areas and Irrigation systems unttl such time as those operations are the responsibilities of other parttes as approved by the Planning DIrector. 24, Street 11ghts shall be provtded withtn the subdivision in accordance with the standards of Ordinance 461 and the following: 1) Concurrently with the ftllng of subdivision Improvement plans with the Road Department, the developer shall secure approval of the proposed f - street 11ght layout first from the Road Department's traf ic engineer and then from the appropriate uttltty purveyor. 2) Following approval of the street lighting layout by the Road Department's traffic engineer, the developer shall also file an application with LAFCO for the fomation of a street lighting district, or annexation to an existing lighting district, unless the site is within an existing lighting district. 3) Prior to recordation of the final map, the developer shall secure conditional approval of the street lighting application from LAFCO, unless the site is within an existing lighting district. 4) All street lights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and Safety for plan check approval and shall comply with the requirements of Riverside County Ordinance No. 655 and the Riverside County Comprehensive General Plan. 25. Prior to recordatlon of the final map, an Environmental Constraints Sheet {ECS) shall be prepared in conjunction with the final map to delineate identified environmental concerns and shall be pemanently filed with the office of the County Surveyor. A copy of the ECS shall be transmitted to the Planning Department for review and approval. The approved ECS shall be forwarded with copies of the recorded final map to the Planning Department and the Department of Building and Safety. A. The following note shall be placed on the Environmental Constraints Sheet: "County Slope Stability Report No, 89 was prepared for this property and is on ftle at the Riverside County Planning Department, Specific items of concern in the report are as follows: slope stability." 26. Prior to the issuance of GRADING PERMITS the following conditions shall be satisfied: TENTATXVE TRACT NO. 24135, And. #1 Conditions of Approval Page 8 be Ce P~+oF ~o &he 4sswanse e~ g~ad+eg perm~ts~ the app~ieaet sha~ .brain e~eawanee fwem ~he MrS, F~sk and ~d~fe ;e~v~ee, e,e~,ating te the eMtstenee e~ the ~tephens-' Kangaroo Rat site, (Deleted - Planning Commission - April 12, 1989) Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall' comply with Ordinance No. 663 by paying the fee required by that ordinance. Should Ordinance No. 663 be superseded by the provisions of a Habitat Con;ervation 'Plan prior to the payment of the fees required by Ordinance No. 633, the applicant shall pay the fee required under the Habitat Conservation Plan as implemented by County ordinance or resolution. Prior to the issuance of gFadieg building permits detailed common open space area landscaping and irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning Department approval for the phase of development in process. The plans shall be certified by a landscape architect, and shall provide for the following: {Amended - Planning Commission - April 12, 1989) 1. Permanent automatic irrigation systems shall be installed on all landscaped areas requiring irrigation. 2. Landscape screening where required shall be designed to be opaque up to a minimum height of six (6) feet at maturity. All utility service areas and enclosures shall be screened from view with landscaping and decorative barriers or baffle treatments, as approved by the Planning Director. Utilities shall be placed underground. Parkways and landscaped building setbacks shall be landscaped to provide visual screening or a transition into the primary use area of the site. Landscape elements shall include earth berming, ground cover, shrubs and specimen trees in conjunction with meandering sidewal ks, benches and other pedestrian amenities where appropriate as approved by the Planning Department. . S. Landscaping plans shall incorporate the use of specimen accent trees at key visual focal points Within the project. Where street trees cannot be interior streets and project right-of-way, they shall be right-of-way. planted within right-of-way of parkways due to insufficient road planted outside of the road 7. Landscaping plans shall incorporate native and drought tolerant plants where appropriate. TENTATZVE TRACT NO. 24135, AIM. Condtttoas of Approval Page g All extsttng spectmen trees and significant rock outcroppings on the subject property shall be shown on the project's gradtng plans and shall note those to be removed, relocated and/or retained. 9. All trees shall be minimum double staked. growing trees shall be steel staked, Weaker and/or slow 10..The plans shall conform to those shown in Specific Plan No. 219. de Any oak trees removed with four (4) inch or larger trunk diameters shall be replaced on a ten (10} to one (1) basis as approved by the Planning Director. Replacement trees shall be noted on approved landscaping plans. The following tree preservation guidelines shall the projects approved grading, building and appropriate: be incorporated in landscaping plans as Every effort shall be made to prevent encroachment of structures, grading or trenching within the dripline or twenty-five (25) feet of the trunk of any trees, whichever is greater. If encroachment within the dripline is unavoidable, no more than one third of the root area shall be disturbed, graded or covered with impervious materials. The root area is considered to extend beyond the dripline a distance equal to one half the radius. Building, grading or improvements shall not occur within ten (10) feet of any tree trunk. Retaining walls shall be constructed where necessary to preserve natural grade at least one-half the distance between the trunk and the dripline. Walls shall be designed with a post or caisson footing rather than a continuous footing to minimize root damage. Alteration of natural drainage shall be avoided to the greatest extent possible. Runoff channelled near trees shall not substantially change normal soil mistore characteristics on a seasonal basis. Runoff shall not be directed towards the base of trees so that the base of the trees remain in wet soil for an extended period. Where natural topography has been altered, drainage away from trunks shall be provided where necessary to ensure that water will not stand at the crown. TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 24135,/mid. Conditions of Approval Page 10 Sedtmentatton and st]ration tn the dratnage ~ays shall be controlled where necessary to avotd ftlltng around the base of the trees. Land uses that would cause excessive sot1 compactIon within the drtpltne of trees shall be avotded. If the areas are plann~ for recreation, provide tratls to restrtct compactton to a small area. Heavy use under trees shall be avoided unless measures to minimize compactton are undertaken. Landscaping or irrigation shall not be installed within ten (10) feet of any trees. All existing native specimen trees on the subject property shall be preserved wherever feasible. Where they cannot be preserved they shall be tel,cared or replaced with specimen trees as approved by the Planntng DIrector. Replacement trees shall be noted on approved landscaping plans. All approved grading and building plans shall reflect the utilization of post and beam foundations or the appropriate combination of split level pads and post and beam foundations when development is proposed on natural slopes of fifteen percent or greater measured over a horizontal distance of thirty (30) feet. If the project is to be phased, prior to the approval of grading permits, an overall conceptual grading plan shall be submitted to the Planning Director for approval. The plan shall be used as a guideline for subsequent detailed grading plans for individual phases of development and shall include the following: 1) Techniques which will be utilized to prevent erosion sedimentation during and after the grading process. and 2) Approximate time frames for grading and identification of areas which may be graded during the higher probability rain months of January through March 3) Preliminary pad and roadway elevations 4) Areas of temporary grading outside of a particular phase Driveways shall be designed so as not to exceed a fifteen (15) percent grade· Grading plans shall conform to Board adopted Hillside Development Standards: All cut and/or fill slopes, or individual combinations thereof, which exceed ten feet in vertical height shall be modified by TENTATZVE TRACT NO. 24135, Amd. t1 Conditions of Approval Page 11 an appropriate combination of a spectal terracing (benchlng) plan, Increased slope ratto (i.e., 3:1), retaining walls, and/or slope planttrig combtned with Irrigation. All driveways shall not exceed a fifteen percent grade· All cut slopes located adjacent to ungraded natural terrain and exceeding ten (10) feet in vertical height shall be contour-graded incorporating the following grading techniques: 1) The angle of the graded slope shall be gradually adjusted to the angle.of the natural terrain. 2) Angular forms shall be discouraged. The graded form shall reflect the natural rounded terrain. 3) The toes and tops of slopes shall be rounded with curves with radii designed in proportion to the total height of the slopes where drainage and stability permit such rounding. 4) Where cut or fill slopes exceed 300 feet in horizontal length, the horizontal contours of the slope shall be curved in a continuous, undulattng fashion. Natural features such as water courses, specimen trees and significant rock outcrops shall be protected in the siting of individual building pads on final grading plans. me Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the developer shall provide evidence to the Director of Building and Safety that all adjacent off-site manufactured slopes have recorded slope easements and that slope maintenance responsibilities have been assigned as approved by the Director of Building and Safety. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, a qualified paleontologist shall be retained by the developer for consultation and comment on the proposed grading with respect to potential paleontological impacts. Should the paleontologist find the potential is high for impact to significant resources, a pre-grade meeting between the paleontologist and the excavation and grading contractor shall be arranged. When necessary, the paleontologist or representative shall have the authority to temporarily divert, redirect or halt grading activity to allow recovery of fossils. Prior to the issuance of BUILDING PERNITS the following conditions shall be satisfied: 1) The project shall comply with the requirements of Development Agreement No. 4. TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 24135, Amd. tl Conditions of Approval Page 12 2) Prior to the submittal of building plans to the Department of Building and Safety an acoustical study shall be performed by an acoustical engineer to establish appropriate mitigation measures that shall be applied to individual dwelling units within the subdivision to reduce ambient interior noise levels to 45 Ldn. 3) PrtGr to the issuance of butl.dtng permits, composite landscaping and irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning Department approval. The plans shall address all areas and as~e~ts of the tract requiring landscaping and irrigation to be tnstal including, but not limited to, parkway planting, street trees, slope planting, and individual front yard landscaping per the requirements of Specific Plan No. 219. 4) All dwellings to be constructed within this subdivision shall be designed and constructed with fire retardant (Class B) roofs as approvedby the County Fire Marshal. 5) Roof-mounted mechanical equipment shall not be permitted within the subdivision, however solar equipment or any other energy saving devices shall be permitted with Planning Department approval. 6} Roof-mounted equipment shall be shielded from view of surrounding property. 7) Building separation between all buildings excluding fireplaces shall not be less than ten (10) feet. 8) All street side yard setbacks shall be a minimum of ten (10) feet. g} All front yards shall be provided with landscaping and automatic irrigation. Prior to the issuance of OCCUPANCY PERNITS the following conditions shall be satisfied: 1) Wall and/or fence locations and materials shall conform to the approved wall and fence ~reatment plan in Specific Plan No. 219. 2) All landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in accordance with approved plans prior to the issuance of occupancy permits. If seasonal conditions do not permit planting, interim landscaping and erosion control measures shall be utilized as approved by the Planning Director and the Director of Building and Safety. 3) All landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in accordance with approved plans and shall be verified by a Planning Department field inspection. TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 24135,/end. Conditions of Approval Page 13 4) Not vrlthstandtng the preceding conditions, wherever ~an acoustical study ts required for noise attenuation purposes, the heights of a]] required walls shal] be determined by the acousttca] study where appltcable. Concrete sidewalks shall be constructed throughout the subdivision in accordance with the standards of Ordinance 461 and Specific Plan No. 219.. Street trees shall be planted throughout the subdivision tn accordance with the standards of Ordinance 460 and Spectflc Plan No. 219 Prior to the tssuance of a building permit, the subdivider shall prepare and submtt a written report to the Planntng Director of the County of Riverside demonstrating compliance w~th those conditions of approval and mitigation measures of thts map and E.A. No. 33434 which must be satisfied prior to the issuance of a building permit. s) 6) The Planning Director may require inspection or other monitoring to such compliance. {Added - Planning Commission - April 12, 1989) assure cO:cj:gs OFFICE OF ROAD COMMISSIONER & COUNTY SURVEYOR Riverside County Planning Commission 4080 Lemon atreet Riverside, CA 92501 April 12, 1989 MaPe~-6r-}g89 C. Ob'WTY A,DNNtSTIm. ATTV[ (Ivrt, R I, UJUNC 4Z)C)R,E~ !m O. BOx IOeo R.f~T.J~U)(. CAUTOR.%LA 'm2502 (l' 14; rl7.~,554 Ladies and Gentlemen: Re: TR 24135 - Amend Wl Schedule A - Team SP - SND#9 *As Amended at P.C. 4-12-89 With respect to the conditions of approval for the referenced tentative land division map, the Road Department recommends that the landdivider provide the following street improvement plans and/or road dedications in accordance with Ordinance 460 and Riverside County Road Improvement Standards (Ordinance 461). It is understood that the tentative map correctly shows acceptable centerline profiles, all existing easements~., traveled ways, and drainage courses with appropriate O's, and that the omission or unacceptability may require the map to be resubmitted f~. further consideration. These Ordinances and the following conditions are essential parts and a requirement occurring in ONE is as. binding as though occurring in all. They are intended to be complementary and to describe the conditions for a complete design of the improvement. All questions regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the Road Commissioner's Office. 1. The 'landdivider shall protect downstream properties from damages caused by alteration of the drainage patterns, i,e., concentration of diversion of flow. Protection shall be provided by constructing adequate drainage facilities including enlarging existing facilities and/ or by securing a drainage easement. All drainage easements shall be shown on the final map and noted as follows: 'Drainage Easement - no building, obstructions, or encroachments by land fills are allowed". The protection shall be as approvedby the Road Department. 2. The landdivider shall accept and properly dispose of all offsite drainage flowing onto or through t~e site. In the event the Road'Commissioner permits the use of streets for drainage purposes, the provisions of Article XI of Ordinance No. 460 will apply. Should the quantities exceed the street capacity or the use of streets be prohibited for drainage purposes, the subdivider shall provide adequate drainage facilities as approved by.the Road Department. TR 241)5 - Amend #1 14e4se~+r-) April 12, 1989 Pa9e 2 Major drainage is involved on this landdivision and its resolution shall be as approved by the Road Department. Street "M" shall be improved within the dedicated right of way in accordance with modified County Standard No. 100, (84'/108' as approved by th~ Road Commissioner). Streets "B", "P", "L" (north of Street "N"), and Street "E" (at Pio Pico Road) shall be improved within the dedicated right of way in accordance with modified County Standard No. 104, Section A. (50'/70' with entry median as approved by the Road Commissioner). The remaining interior streets shall be improved within the dedicated right of way in accordance with County Standard No. 104, Section A. (40'/60') Margarita Road shall be improved with concrete curb and gutter located 43 feet from centerline and match up asphalt concrete paving; reconstruction; or resurfacing of existing paving as determined by the Road Commissioner within a 55 foot half width dedicated right of way in accordance with County Standard No. 100. Street "A" shall be improved with 34 feet of asphalt concrete pavement within a 45 foot part width dedicated right of way in accordance with modified County Standard No. 103, Section A. (24'/33', as approved by the Road Commisioner) Pio Pico Road shall be improved with 34 feet of asphalt concrete pavement within a 45 foot part width dedicated right of way in accordance with County Standard No. 103, Section A. (22'/33') Corner cutbacks in Conformance 'with County Standard No. 805 shall be shown on the final map and offered for dedication· Improvement plans shall be based upon a centerline profile extending a minimum of 300 feet beyond the project boundaries at a grade and alignment as approved by the Riverside County Road Commissioner. Completion of road improvements does not imply acceptance for main- tenance by County. TR 24135 - Amend ll P4r{4q-(h-(~69 April Page 3 12, 1989 4. 15. 18. 19. 0e 23. Standard cul-de-sacs'and knuckles and off-set cul-de-sacs shall be constructed throughout the landdivision. Asphaltic emulslon (fog seal) shall be applied not less than fourteen days following placement of the asphalt surfacing and shall be applied at a rate of 0.05 gallon per square yard. Asphalt emulsion shall conform to Section 39 and 94 of the State Standard Specifications. The landdivider will provide left turn lanes on Pio Pico Road and Street 'A' at all interior intersections as approved by the Road Department. The landdivider shall provide utility clearance from Rancho California Water District prior to the recordation of the final map. The maximum centerline gradient and the minimum centerline radii shall be in conformance with County Standard #114 of Ordinance 461. All centerline intersections shall be at 90° with a minimunV mqas~ed from flow line~ ~ ~ ~T~-~v~ ~ "'- Concrete sidewalks shall be constrhcted throughout the landdivision in accordance with County Standard No. 400 and 401 (curb sidewalk). The minimum lot frontages along the cul-de-sacs and knuckles shall be 35 feet. All driveways-shall conform to the applicable Riverside County Standards and shall be shown on the street improvement plans. A minimum of four feet of full height curb shall be constructed between driveways. The minimum garage setback shall be 30 feet measured from the face of curb. Prior to the recordation of the final map, the developer shall deposit with the Riverside County Road Departmann; a cash sum of $150.00 per lot as mitigation for traffic signal impacts. Should the developer choose to defer the time of payment, a written agreement may be entered into with the County deferring said payment to the time of issuance of a building permit. Electrical and communications trenches shall be provided in accordance with Ordi.ance 461, Standard 817. TR 241~[5 - Amend #1 .MarcJ~-&,-~l~ April 12, 1989 Page 4 27. 28. 29. Lot access shall be.restricted on Margarita Road, Street "M". Plo Pico Road, and Street "A" and so noted on the final map. Landdivisions creating cut or fill slopes adjacent to the streets shall provide erosion control, sight distance control and slope easements as approved by the Road Department. When blockwalls are required to be constructed on top of sl6pe, a debris retention wall shall be constructed at the street right of way line to prevent silting of sidewalks as approved by the Road Commissioner. The street design and improvement concept of this project shall be coordinated with Specific Plan No. 219. Street lighting shall be required in accordance with Ordinance 460 and 461 throughout the subdivision. The County Service Area (CSA) Administrator determines whether this proposal qualifies under an existing assessment district or not. If not, the land owner shall file an application with LAPCO for annexation into or creation of a "Lighting Assessment District" in accordance with Governmental Code Section 56000. Street lights shall be installed in accordance with Ordinance 460 and 461 at all intersections of roads constructed or improved within the subdivision. The county Service Area {CSA) Administrator determines whether the subdivision is within an existing assessment district. If not, the land owner shall file an application with LAFCO for annexation into or creation of a County Service Area in accordance with Governmental Code Section 25210.1. All private and public entrances and/or intersections opposite this project shall be coordinated with this project and shown on the street improvement plans. A striping plan is required for Margarita Road, Pio Pico Road, Street "M" and Street "A'. The removal of the existing striping shall be the responsibility of applicant. 'Traffic signing and striping shall be done by County forces with all incurred costs borne by the applicant. Should this' project lie within any assessment/benefit district, the applicant shall prior to recordation make application for and pay for their reapportionment of the assessments or pay the unit fees in the benefit dishriot unless said fees are deferred to building permit. TR 24135 - Amend 11 -MarGb-6,-&eig Apri 1 12, 1989 Page 5 The following conditions from Specific Plan No. 219 - Vail Meadows shall also apply: All road improvements, unless otherwise noted, shall be constructed to ultimate County Standards in accordance with Ordinance No. 460 and 461 as a requirement of the implementing subdivisions for the Specific Plan, subject to approval by the Road Commissioner. The proposed "Gateway Road' is approved, in concept, subject to the submittal and ~eview of design details. Any landscaping within public road rights of way will require approval by the Road Commissioner and assurance of continuing maintenance through the establishment of a landscape maintenance district or similar mechanism as approved by the Road Commissioner. The Rancho Villages Assessment is an integral component of the planning for this area. Prior to the recordation of tract maps within this specific plan or any other project located within the assessment district, the final actions necessary for formation of the district must be completed. Should the district fail, the project proponent shall, prior to the recordation of any tract maps within the specific plan boundaries, provide for road improvements in accordance with Table XV-Implementation Schedule for On- Site Roadway Improvements and Table XVI-Implementation Schedule for Off-Site RRadway Improvements, as attached. In response to the concerns 'voiced by Caltrans relative to cumulative impacts indicating the need to implement demand management strategies and/or provide for the development of additional highway corridors, the project proponent has agreed to fund such a study to be conducted under the direction of the Road Department as prescribed by Caltrans. The study is currently in progress. Very truly yours, E1 mer Baumgarten Subdivision Engineer ' EB:Jw County of Riverside TO: FROM: RE: RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPT. DATE: February TRACT Ke 24135, Amended No. 1 27, 1989 E~vlromnental Health Services has revteved Amended No. 1 dated February 23,192~Our current c~ments will remain as stated in our letter dated January 11, 1989. SM:tac FEB ~ 8 1989 {BEN. FORM 4. fray. __ ,COUNTY oF RIVERSIDE , DEPARTMENTof HEALTH RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPT. Riversidet CA 92502 ATTN: Caris Ormsby RE: TRACT MAP 24135: Parcels 8 and 9 of Parcel Map 23432 (325 Lots) 8aJlgNIO BANNING. CA 8a'220 ,,-.-, · alA BLABCA 7~dO MARG4,iERITA COllOin C4:~OedA. CA rlTlO IIO NORTH STATE NEM~T. CA Ill4'n IlllO 46-109 OASl· IfltEE-Y IMDK. Ca llZOl 10tli IrflASEPi Calf; ~. CA. SIll0 lal'O LHd~N ITSSET emvinS~. C~ h*&O~' tlVlcR&l~(, CA I;e. Ol Gentlemen: The Depart~nent of Public Health has reviewed Tentative Map No. 24135 and recommends that: A water system shall be installed according to plans and specifications as approved by the water company and the llealth Department. Permanent prints of the plans of' the water system shall be submitted in triplicatel with a minimum scale not less than one inch equals 200 feett along with the original drawing to the County Surveyor. The prints shall show the internal pipe diameter, location of valves and fire hydrants; pipe and Joint specifications, and the size of the main at the Junction of the new system to the existing system. The plans shall comply in all respects with Div. 5, Part 1, Chapter 7 of the California Health and Safety Code, California Administrative Code, Title 22, Chapter 16, and General Order No. 103 of the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California, when applicable. The plans 'shall be siSned by a registered engineer and water company with the following certification: 'I certify that the-design of the water system in Tract Hap 24135 is in accordance with the vat.at system expansion plans of the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District and that the water service, storage and distribution system will be adequate to provide water service-to such tract. This certification does not constitute a Guarantee that it will supply water to such tract at any specific quantities,. flows or pressures for fire protection or any other purpose", This certification shall be siSned by a responsible official of the water company. The plans must be submitted to the County Surveyor's Office to review at least two weeks prior to the request for the recordation of the final map. ~Pe t~: Riv~rslde County Ylm-~ing Dept. Page T~o ATTN: Chrts OTtoshy January 11, 1989 This DeparUnent has a statement from =he Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District agreeing to serve dom&stic water. to each and every lot in the subdivision on defraud, providing satisfactory financial arrangements are completed with the Subdivider. It will be necessary for the financial arrangements to be made prior to the recordation of the final map. This Department has a statement from the Elsinore Valley Municipal Wa/er District agreeing to alloy the subdivision sewage system to be connected to the sewers of the District. The sewer system shall be installed according to plans and specifications as approved by =he District, the Count~ Surveyor and the Health Department. Perm-nent prints of the plans of the sever system shall be submitted in triplicate, along with the original drawin8, to the County Surveyor. The prints shall show the internal pipe diameter, location of manholes, complete profiles, pipe and Joint specifications and the size of =he sewers at the Junction of the new s~stem to the existing system. A single plat indicating location of sewer lines and water lines shall be a portion of the sewa8e plans and profiles. The plans shall be signed by a registered engineer and the sever district with the following certification: "I certify tha't the design of the sewer system in Tract PLap 24135 is in accordance with the sewer s~s=em expansion plans of the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District and that the waste disposal ayetam is adequate at this time to treat the anticipated wastes from the proposed tract". The plans must be submitted to the County guTrePorts Office to .review at least two weeks ~rior to the request for the recordation of the final map- It will be necessary for the financial arrangements to be made prior to recordation of the final map. Sincerely, Enviromnen~al Health Services ~" Subject: Tract 24135 Page 2 All buildings shall be constructed with fire retardant roofing material as described in Section 3203 of the'Uniform Building Code. Any rood shingles or shakes shall have a Class "B" rating and shall be approved by the Fire Deparr~nent prior co installation. HITICATION Prior to the recordation of the final map, the developer shall deposit vith the Riverside County Fire Department, a cash sum of $400.00 p~r lot/unit as mitigation for fire protection impacts. Should the developer choose to defer the time of payment, h&/she may enter into a srritten agreement with the County deferring said payment to the time of issuance of the first building permit. All questions regarding the meaning of condi~ions shall be referred to the Planning and Engineering staff. RAYNOND H. REGIS Chief Fire Department Planner Kur~ Han~vell, Fi~e SaEety Specia~is~ ~a (619) :~42-8886 FIRE PROTECTION AiaDLEN J. NEk,"I'iA~ 2-2~-89 4080 lzmon SUefi, Suite ~ CA 92501 (~14) 787-6606 TO: ATTN: RE: PLANNING DEPARIHENT CHRIS ORHSBY TRACT 24135- E~ENDED tl Wlth respect to the conditions of approval for the above referenced land division, the Flre Department recommends the following fire protection measures be provided in accordance wlth Riverside County Ordinances and/or recognized fire protection standards: FIRE PROTECTION Schedule "A" fire protection approved standard 'fire hydrants, (6"x4"x2~") locateu one at each street intersection and spaced no more than 330 feet apart in any direction, vtch no portion ofany lot frontage more than 165 feet from a hydrant. l~Lnimum fire flow shall be 1000 GPM for 2 hours duraclon a= 20 PSI. Applicant/developer sh~ll furnlsh one copy of =he wa=er system plans to the Fire Department for review. Plans shall conform to fire hydrant types, location and spaclng, and, the system shall meet the flre flow requirements. Plans shall be signed/approved by a registered civil engineer and the local water company with the following certification: "1 certify that the design of the water system is in accordance with =he requirements prescribed by =he Riverside County Fire Department." The required water system, including fire hydrants, shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building material being placed on an individual lot. _. HAZARDOUS FIRE AREA The land division is located in the "Hazardous Fire Area" of Ktverstde County as sho~n on a map on file with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors. Any building constructed on lots created by this land division shall comply with the special construction provisions contained in Ktverstde County Ordinance 546. All road medians to be set back 30 feet from curb line at all intersections- Riverside County Planning Department Re= Vesting Tract 24135 Amended Map No. i -2- March 27, 1989 4. All lots should be graded to drain to the adjacent street or an adequate outlet. The 10 year storm flow should be contained within the curb and the 100 year storm flow should be contained within the street right of way. When either of these criteria is exceeded, additional drainage facilities should be installed. Drainage facilities outletting sump conditions should be designed to convey the tributary 100 year storm flows. Additional emergency escape should also be provided· The property's street and lot grading should be designed in a manner that perpetuates the existing natural drainage patterns with respect to tributary drainage area, outlet points and outlet conditions, otherwise, a drainage easement should be obtained from the affected property owners for the release of concentrated or di- verted storm flows· A copy of the recorded drainage easement should be submitted to the District for review prior to ~he recordation of the final map. Temporary erosion control measures should be implemented immediately following rough grading to prevent deposition of debris onto downstream properties or drainage facilities. Development of this property should be coordinated with the development of adjacent properties to ensure that watercourses remain unobstructed and stormwaters are not diverted from one watershed to another. This may require the construction of temporary drainage facilities or offsite construction and grading· A portion of the proposed project is in a floodplain and my affect swaters of the United Statess swatlands" or =Jurisdictional streambeds=, therefore, in accordance with~he requirements of the National Flood Insurance-- Program and Related Regulations (44 CFR, Parts 59 through 73) and County Ordimance No- 458~ A copy of appropriate correspondence and necessary permits from those government agencies from which approval is required byFederal or State law (such as Corps of Engineers 404 permit or Department of Fish and Game 1603 agreement) should be provided to the District prior to the final District approval of the project. KENNETH L_ EDWARDE ~Nlllr INOINIIR RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT IIIVE'IIIIDE', GAL.IItOIINIA ItlOt March 27, 1989 1111 MARKEr I'I'llE'I'T P. O. BOX 1033 ITJ, F, PHONE (114) 111-lOll Riverside County Planning Department County Administrative Center Riverside, California Attention= Specific Plan Section Chris Ormsby Ladies and Gentlemen: Re: Vesting Tract 24135 Amended Map No. 1 This is a proposal to divide about 83 acres in the Rancho Cal- ifornia area. The site is to the north of Highway 79 between Margarita Road and Butterfield Stage Road. This project is a part of Specific Plan 219, Vail Meadows. The area consists of well defined ridges and natural watercourses which traverse this property. Local offsite flows are tributary to the site's northeast and southeast boundaries. A storm drain is proposed along Pio Pico Road to collect the flows from the southeast. This storm drain would be connected to an existing 120-inch diameter storm drain across the school site to the southeast as shown on the Exhibit B. Another storm drain is pro- posed across the middle of this property. This storm drain would discharge the flows into two existing 42-inch diameter culverts under Margarita Road as shown on the tentative map. Onsite flows and other local offsite flows would be conveyed with streets and the above two storm drains. Following are the District's recommendations: The 100 year offsite tributary flows should be collected and safely conveyed through the site to an adequate outlet. Onsite drainage facilities located outside of road right of way should be contained within drainage easements shown on the final map. A note should be added to the final map stating, 'Drainage easements shall be kept free of buildings and obstructions'. Offsite drainage facilities should be located within publicly dedicated drainage easements obtained from the affected property owners. The documents should be recorded and a copy submitted to the District prior to recordation of the final map. -3- March 27, 1989 Riverside County Planning Department Rez Vesting Tract 24135 Amended Map No. i 1. Major flood control facilities are being proposed. These should be designed and constructed to District standards including those related to alignment and access to both inlets and outlets. The applicant should consult the District early in the design process regarding materials, hydraulic design and transfer of rights of way. All flood control facilities should be constructed to District standards. And all facilities that the District will assume for maintenance will require the payment of a one time maintenance charge equal ~o the 'present worth" of maintenance costs from the time of acceptance through 1998. 3. A copy of the improvement plans, grading plans and final map along with supporting hydrologic and hydraulic calculations should be submitted to the District via the Road Department for review and approval prior to recordation of the final map. Grading plans should be approved prior to issuance of grading permits. Questions concerning this ma~ter may be referred ~o Robert Chiang of this office at' 714/787-2333. Very truly yours, co: Robert Bein, and Associates KENNETH L. EDWARDS RCzpln January 18,. 1989 I Administrative Center * 1777 Atlanta Avenue Riverside, CA 92507 Riverside County Planning ~epartment Attentio~ Ron Goldman County Administrative Center 4080 Lemon Street. ' Riverside, CA 92501 Vesting Tract 24135 Ladies and Gentlemen: The Land Use Division ~f the Department of Building and Safety has the following comments and conditions= Prior to the issuance of building permits, the developer shall obtain Planning Department approval for all on-site and off- site signage advertising the sale of the subdivision pursuant to Section 19.6 of Ordinance 348. Prior to issuance of building permits, proposed lighting must be in conformance with Mount Palomar Lighting Plan, Zone B, per Ordinance 655. Fireplaces may encroach 1' into required minimum 5' side'yard setback. Mechanical equipment may not be located in required minimum 5' side yard setback. Very truly yours, Thomas H. lngram, Directo~ DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING AND SAFETY Administration (714) 682-8840 · (714) 787-2020 b'rATE (:~ CAUFOiRNIA~INES$, TIAhlSIN:NRTAT1ON AND HOUSI~ AGENCY ,:PARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION k,-~TRSCT l, P.O. IOX 231 TDD ('/14) 383.409 January 3, 1989 JAN 6 CeEC~C~ DC-4JKMEJIAN, Geecruet Development Review 08-Riv-79-17.376 Your Reference: VT 2~135 Planning Department Attention Mr. Chris Ormsby County of Riverside q080 Lemon Street Riverside, CA 92501 Dear Mr. Ormsby: Thank you for the opportunity to review the proposed Vesting Tract 2q135 located adjacent to Nargarita Road and north of Pio Pico Road in Rancho California. Please refer to the attached Development Review Form which documents Gaittans' requirements for this project. Conformance with these conditions is required for issuance of an Encroachment Permit. If any work is necessary within the state highway right of way, the developer must obtain sn encroachment permit from the Caltrsns District 8 Permit Office prior to beginning work. If additional information is desired, please call Mr. Thomas J. Neville at (714) 383-438q. Very truly yours, ~LEWANDOWSKI District Permits Engineer Att· CALM DEVELOPNEWT REVIEW FORM (Your Reference) *- --. Plan Checker . .. : .~ ~ ., ..,* . : .-.':,.-. WE WOULD LIXE TO NOTE: ": ~'~** .i~ :..,. · :**"'*~ =~.* * 7 · ~ c*. .... t Date I%/- 79 -17. :5~-'-, (Co Rte PM) W~en plans are sub{Erred, please nonform to the requirements of the attached wHandout". This wtll expedite the review process and time required for Plan Check. Although the traffic and drainage generated by this proposal do not appear to have a stgnific~-nt effect on the state highway system, consideration must be given to the cumulative effect of continued development in this area, Any measures necessary to mitigate the cumAlatlve impact of traffic and drainage shall be provided prior to or with development of the area that necessitates the~. It appears that the traffic and drainage generated by this proposal could have a significant effect on the state highway system of the area. ~_ny measures necessary to mitigate the traffic and drainage impacts shall be included with the development. This portion of state highway is included in the California ~aster Plan of State Highways Eligible for Official Scenic Highway Designation, and in the future your agency my wish to have this route officially designated as a state scenic high~y. This portion of state highway has been officially designated as a s~ate scenic highway, and development in this corridor should be ccxnpatible with the scenic highway concept. It is recognized that there is considerable public concern about noise levels adjacent to heavily ~f~veled highways. hnd development, in order to be cornpat ~ with this concern, may require special noise attenuaLi~n measures. Development _. property should include any necessary noise att~uation. WE REQUEST THAT TPZ ITEMS CHECKED BELOW BE INCLUDED IN THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR THIS PROJECT: Normal right of way dedication to pruvide __ half-width on the state highway, Normal street improwenents to gmovide__ half-width on the state hig~h~?y, Curb and gutter, State Standard __ along the state high~2y, Parking shall be pmhibited along the state high~y by painting the curb red and/or by the proper placement of "no parking" signs, radius m returns be provided at intersec. tions with the state high~y, A standard k~elchair ramp must be pruvided in t,be returns, A positive vehicular barrier along the property fruntage shall be provided to limit physical access to the 'state highway, _ Vehtcttlar access shall not be developed directly to the state highway, .;. . Vehicular access to t~e state highmy shall be provided by existing public road nonnec~ions, ¥ehicular access to the state .~...y shall be provided. by __ standard driveways, * -* Vehicular access shall no~ be p~ded within of the intersection at Vehicular .access to the state higlT~ay shall be provided by a road-type comnect'- .... Form 8-PD19 (Rev. 5/8?) ',Continued on reverse) Date: January 3, 1989 ~'- 79-,7.~7G (Co-Rte-PM) (Your Reference) ADDITIONAL~0MMENTS: Due to magnitude of this proposal and the constructicn exp!oszDn (residential, commercial), the contract should contribute to all Hlghway improvements necessary 5o m~-intaln t,he e.xis~ing ~r~fflc flc~.: patterns. In addition, i5 appear~ that this development is vl~hln Ranchc V~-la~e Assessment Diszr;cZ and ~herefore reccrz. eni %h= owner ~ar~lc~pa~e in the assessments for the Vehicular access connections shall be paved at least within the slate highway right or w~y. Access points to the state highway shali be developed in a manner that ~rill prov sight distance for mph alonE the state highway. Landscaping along the state highway shall be low and forgiving in nature. A left-turn lane, including any necessary widening, shall be provided on the state highway at ' Consideration shall be given to the provision, or future provision, of signalization and lighting of t.he intersection of and the state highway. A traffic study indicating on- and off-site flow patterns and volt~nes, probable impacts, and proposed mitigation measures shall be prepared. Adequate'off-street parking, which does not reqdire backing onto the state highway, shall be provided. Parking lot shall be developed in a manner that will not cause any vehicular movenent conflicts, including parking stall entrance and exit, w~thin of the entrance from the state highway. Handicap parking shall not be developed in the busy driveway entrance area. Care shall be taken when developing this property to preserve and perpetuate the existing drainage pattern of the state highway. Particular consideration should be given to cumulative increased storm runoff to insure that a highway drainage ~/~oblem is not created. y necessary noise ~.t~tenuation shall be provided as part of the development of this property. Please refer to attacheC additional ccenents. WE REQUEST: A copy of any conditions of approval or revised approval. v/' A copy of any doe~nents providing additional state highway right of way upon recordation of the map. WE REQUEST THE OPPORTUNITY TO REVIEW DURING THE APPROVAL PROCESS: Any proposals to further develop this property. A copy of the traffic or enviromental study, V/ A check print of the Parcel or .T~aet Map. t/A check print of the Plans. for any improvements within the state highway right of waY- _,. JA check print of the Grading and Drainage Plans for this property when availabl~ January 17, 1989 Be~'d ef D~,~cto~: Riehm'd D. 8teffe~ President d~ee ~ D~by St. Vice ~sident ~ph D~ly Doug Kulberg Jon ~ Lun~ deff~y L M~er T, C. Rowe Officers: Stan T. Mius General Manager PhiLlip L Forbes Director of Finance- Treasurer Thomu E McA!iester Director of Operations & Doffs V. Baker D~u~ Se~ta~ McCormick & Fadman Leg-~ Compel Riverside County Planning Department 4080 Lemon Street, 9th Floor Riverside, California 92501-3657 Subject: Water Availability Reference: Vesting Tract 24135 Gentlemen: Please be advised that the above-referenced property is located within the boundaries of Rancho California Water District. Water service, therefore, would be available upon completion of financial arrangements between RCWD and the property owner. Water availability would be contingent upon the property owner signing an Agency Agreement which assigns water management rights, if any, to RCWD. If you have any questions, please contact Senga Deherty at (714) 676-4101. Very truly yours, RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT Bob Lemons, P.E. Acting Director of Engineeri.ng roz2/d tlsf RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT 28061 DIAZ ROAD · POST OFFICE BOX 174 · TEMECULA, CA 92390-0174 · (714) 676-4101 · FAX (714) 676-0615 · ZE, tern Municipal'Water Disti-ict ~.~ R~verside C~. Planning Dept. 4080 'Lemon S~.. 9th FloOr R~vers~de, Ca 92501 /'~_t!:%~tAL t2/ The District is responding to your request for comments on the subject project relative to water and/or sewer service. The items checked below apply to this project review. The subject project: / Is not within EMWD's: water service area sewer service area /Will be required to construct/provide the following facilities if to be served by ENWD: !~eWer Service A~y and all necessary regionally sized onsite and offsite gravity sewers and appurtenantworks that might include monitoring manholes, lift stations, force-- mains, and effluent disposal/use. Sewers will not be allowed along lot lines/private land. Fee payment and participation in regional sewers, treatment, and,effluent disposal must be met. Only wastes acceptable to EHWD regulations will be allowed. EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT Planning Department 2045 S. San Jacinto Street · Pose Office B, mx R.~00 · Son Jacimo. Oli/ornia 92.~83-1300 · Telcphc,ne (71 4) 925-7676 UNITED STATES POST OFFICE DATE: OUR REF: SUBJECT: TO: COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS · · RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 4080 LEMON ST., 9thFLOOR RIVERSIDE, CA 92501 FUTURE MODE OF DELIVERY= CENTRALIZED CONTACT WITH THE U. S. POSTAL SERVICE IS REEQUIRED BY DEVELOPER/BUILDER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION FOR DELIVERY TYPE AND LOCATIONS. GROWTH MANAGEMENT COORDINATOR Soutl~em California Edison Company P. O. BOx 410 1OO'L.ONG BEACH BOULEVARD LONG BEACH. GAL.IIrO4tlNIA 14::)1OI Riverside County Road Department P. O. Box 1090 Riverside, CA 92502 Attention: Subdivision Section SUBJECT: Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 24135 January 20, 1989 Please be advised that the division of the property sho~n on Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 24135 will not unreasonably interfere with the free and complete exercise o[ any easement(s) held by Southern California Edison Company within the boundaries of said vesting tentative tract map. This letter should not be construed as a subordination of the Company's rights. title and interest in and to said easement(s). nor should this letter be construed as a waiver of any of the provisions contained in said easement(s) or a waiver of any costs for relocation of affected facilities. In the event that the development requires relocation of facil- ities, if any, on the subject property by right of easement or otherwise, the owner/developer will be requested to bear the cost of such relocation and provide Edison with suitable replacement rights. Such costs and replacement rights are required prior to the performance of the relocation. If additional information is required in connection with the above mentioned subject, please call Dennis C. Bazant at (213) 491-2644. DCS/bjw 16160-24ffi:'C co: Very truly yours Robert Bein. William Frost & Associates RiVERSiDE COUnt,u PLannin DEPARCmEn DATE: December 28, 1988 TO: Assessor 8utldtng and Safety Surveyor - Dave Duda Road Department Health - Ralph Luchs Fire Protection Flood Control Otstrict Fish & Game U.S. Postal Service - Ruth E. Oavtdson U.S. Fish & MIldlife Services COJuHISSIdNER MALT ABRAHAM RIVERSZDE COUNTY PARKS EASTERN )tJN/CZPAL MATER COMPANY RANCHO CALZF MATER COMPANY SO CALZF EDISON SO CALIF GAS COMPANY GENERAL TELEPHONE CAL TRANS 18 ,, .... ,___ ....... ELS INORE UNIFI~D"~CHOOL'~I~TRIC~ TEHECULA UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT VESTING TRACT 24135 - (Sp Pl) - E.A. 33434 - Bedford Properties - Robert Beir Willtam Frost & Assoc. - Rancho California Area - First Superv~sortal Distrtct- Adjacent to Margarita, N. of Pio Pico Road - SP Zone - 83.5 Acres 325 lots - Schedule A - No Watver- Hod 118 - A.P. 923-230-002 Please review the case described above, along wtth the attached case map. A Land Oiviston Conmntttee meettrig has been tentatively scheduled for January23, 1989. clears, it wtll then go to publlc hearing. Your con~nents and recommendations are requested prior to January23, 1989 tn order that we.my fnclude them tn the staff report for thfs'parttcular case. Should you have any questions regarding this item, please do not hesttate to contact Chrts Ormsby at 787-1363. Planner CIY,~ENTS: The Elstnore Union Htgh School District facilities are overcrowded and our educational programs seriously tmpacted by increasing student population caused by new residential, conmnerctal and Industrial construction. Therefore, pursuant to California Government Code Section 53080 of AB 2926 and SB 327, this district levies a fee agatnst all new development projects wtthtn 1is boundaries. DATE: 1/4/89 SIGNATURE PLEASE print name and tttle ~;080 LEMON STREET, 9TM FLOOR RIVERSIDE CALIFORNIA 92501 (714) 787-6181 Dr. Larry Haw, Superintendent 46-209 OASIS STREET, ROOM 30, INDIO, CALIFORNIA 9220' (619) 342-827' / ~ IN~ TB.-DBIIARTMBNTAI- LETTER February 9, 1989RTVEl _._ RIVERSIDE TO: Chr~s Ormsby, Planner, County Planntng FRON: Harc Braver, Assistant Park Planner, County Pirk~ SUBJECT: Tentative Tracts: 24131, 24132, 24134, 24135, 24136, 24137 Yall Headors SP 219/EZR 235 The Riverside County Parks Department appreciates the opportunity to review the above referenced and offers the following comments: Parks and Recreations The Development of the proposed tracts vt11 have mtnlmal tmpact on existing regional park facilities. The County Parks Department also has a county-wide recreation trail system. As Indicated by this departaent's response to S.P. 219/EZR 235, Hay 25, 1988 and the Planntng Department's conditions of approval October 4, 1988, the developer arms to provtde recreation tratls along the south stde of the Pauba Road right-of-ray and along the north side of the De Portola Road right-of-way. The latter ts to cross De Portola Road at the development's western most boundary, follow the boundary due south and extt the stte tnto private property to the vest. Tentative tracts 24132 and 24134 wtll impact the hubs Road recreation trat1 and tentative tracts 24136 and 24137 will tmpact De Portola Road Tratl. The above mentioned tracts make no reference to tratls or Ira11 easements. The Parks Department rill 'requtre these trail locations to be sho~n on all tract maps and that they be graded tn an acceptable manner. The Parks Department also requests that tt be 11sled as clearance agenci for maps and gradtng planntngs dealing wtth thts project. Cultural and Htstortc Resources' _~entative iract 24131, 2413Z, Z4134, 24135: Conditional apFoval ts granted for T.T. 24131, 24132, 24134, and 24135 vtth regard to Cultural and H~stortc Resources only. DIleAIITMINTAL LIt'fIR COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE PLANNZNG DEPARTHENT January 31, 1989 T0: ~hrts 0rmsby -Spectftc Plans FRON: Steven A. Kupfeman, Engineering reologist ~ RE: Tentative Tract 24135 Slope Stability Report No. 89 The following report has been revtewed relattve to slope stability at the subject stte: · Slope Stability Analysts, Tentative Tract 24135, The Neadows at Rancho California, Rancho California, CA," by Converse Consultants, dated December 5, 1988. Thts report datemined that: 1. All slopes proposed for the subject tract at or below a height of 35 feet wtll be grossly stable, 2. Both cut and ftll slopes have a high potential for eroston of sandy materials and resultant surftctal Instability. 3. Low strength parameters exist for claystones and siltstones. This report recommended that: 1. Geologtc Inspection of a11 cut slopes should be conducted durtng gradtng. 2, Buttress ftlls my be required for cut slopes wtth adverse materials or conditions. Proposed slopes at the stte should be planted soon after construction and ri11 requtre maintenance to perform tn a satisfactory manner through ttme, Thts report satisfies the General Plan requirement for a slope stability report. The recomendattons tn thts report shall be adhered to in the destgn and construction of thts project, SAK: rd Conditions for Approval: Should any prehistoric or htstortc resources be discovered or uncovered durtng the gradtng process, all work tn that area vtll cease unttl the resource ts evaluated by an archaeologist, or historian and mitigation ts determined and approved by the Htstory Dtvtston of the RIverside County Parks Department and the Archaeological Research Untt,' University of California, Riverside. Tentative Tract 24136: Conditional approval ts granted for T.T. 24136. Conditions for Approval: At the ttme of the alignment of De Portola Road the htstortc resource Rtv-3390-H yes not known. This stte yes found ms a result of the Htstory Otvtston's ortgtnal mitigation for conditional approval of the EZR tZ19 (Nay 25 1988). Although Rtv-3390-H ts located south and east of T.T.2413G, the realignment of De Portola Road must be resolved before ftnal approval of this T.T.24136 ts given by the History DIvision. Tentative Tract 24137: Conditional Approval ts granted for T.T.24137. Conditions for Approval: Street "A", which cuts south and east off De Potrole Road, should not be cut or graded, etc., untt1 mitigation by data collection ts completed for Rtv-1728, Rtv-1729 and Rtv-3391-H. The road rill tmpact all three of these sites at present. Any work tn T.T.24137 mast evotd parcel t6 and Rtv-1728 unttl all archaeological work 1s completed tn that area. The use of heavy equipment anywhere south of De Portola Road mast be avoided until all archaeological work ts completed and protective measures are taken to ensure the safety and future existence of the cultural and historic resources tn that area. Protective measures should constst of fencing around Rtv-3390-H, betng sure not to allow fencing to impact the stte. All mayable surface htstortc resources south of Oe Potrole Road should be photographed, recorded and mapped, after vhtch, they may be moved wtthtn the fenced area at Rtv-3390-H. ~o~ever, the project archaeologist mast direct and supervise the mayanent and placement of these resources to Rtv-3390-H to me sure their placement ~tll not impact the sfte. Although T.T.24137 ts vest of Riv-3390-H, the realignment of De Potrole Road ~ust be resolved and the above conditions met before ftnal approval ts granted to the Htstor~Otvtston. Fa/XP~o376S RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND NOTICE OF DETERMINATION c...o.C.od EA No. ~Sq ~ NEGATIVE DECLARATION Based on the Initial Study, tt has been determined that the proposed project will not have significant environmental effect. PROJECT DESCRIRTZON AND LOCATION: ,fee ~ed Zw~t~Z Stt~y Roger S. Streeter, Planntng Dtrector C~PL~ED By ~/~ ~( ~ Tt tl e ~te ~*~- ~ Case No.(~d) ~ ~' ~ N~. ~(~ Land Dtv Sch Appl/Rap ~/~x. ~ ,,~ ~vel opabl e Lots ~te Su~tted ~--7~-~ Open Space Lots Existing Zones ~p Changes of Pmposed Zones Only Zoning Acreage P/L Oe 77T Oev. Ac ,/l O.Sp. Ac ~ ADOPTED D~ard of Supervisors Person verifying adoption nni ng *Conni ss i on , Area Planning Council Date ~_/ali'~ni ng Di rector D (Other) HEARING BODY OR OFFICER rl Bard of Supervisors ~lanning Comnission D Area Planning Council D Pli'~ning Director 13 (Other) NOTICE OF DETERMINATION ACTION ON PROJECT ir/~proval a Disapproval Date Oevelopable Lots 2Z5' Dev.Ac Open Space Lots /f O.Sp. Ac Changes of Approved Zones Only Zones -. Acreage The project will not have a significant effect on the environment and a Negative Declaration Person verifying t ~ / Title ~P/A.~9~t~ 77F RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 7 4080 LEMON STREET, 9TH FLOOR R~'-°~IDE, CA 92501 1~ L'~,o Ort~H, nal- Cgna.nt7 Clm'ic 2~J C=-;,,n,r - Csso 111o 295-'31 P, ev. 10183) COUNTY STAMP :IiVE:DiDE counc.u -PLAnnlne DEP, IClTIEII;, Ei~~~AL A3~EIENT FORM: EiiVIFIOeII~,~AL/ke~MENT f_A.) IIER: 33434 I~N"zT ~ TYI~) AND liJMBER~(I) Vestinq Tract 24135 ~ I~ Bedford Propoerti es tlmAIE OF f'~ ~'.~l~)~, EJ~ Chris 0rmsby, Planner III L ImOJECT IIFOMMATION ITANDAFID EVALUATION MODI. LE NUMBER(m): ~ ~ ~q iiESCi~IF~ rmelude & ._¢:mmd ~Wnimum I~ mize and uses as mpl~): The site is located within approved Specific Plan No. 219. ~ 1OTAL PRC)dEG'T ARF, k ACRES ~-~-.R r~ #%e-~c)R$ RARCEJ, N04sY. 923-730-002 D. EXI~'rlNGZ/:~G: SP 1~lt4EImR~INCX:)NFORMANCE? E FR~EDZ~G: IS ll(I~ROP0~INCONFORMANCE?-'~,-- F. ~I~E. ETRF. FE~ENb'IE~ The site is located East of Margarita portion of Specific Plan No. 219. ~EECIII)N, ~IP. t&AJ~ ~PTION ()R AI'rAOH A LEGAL DESGRIPTION: Township 8S, Range 2W ~fF OF~ t~XI OF llf ix~ll.~ ENVI~NTkL ElllNG OF THE PROJECT ~ AND II SURROUNDING~ The site consists of rolling hills which have been tilled. The site is vacant at present. IL COM-mm~)l~llV~ GENERAL MAN OPEN IPACE AND CONSERVATION DESIQNATION )mm m;mmmim metalram) m end roamed -~ M ~r ;.srt d ~ mlm m~mm k M ~=i:lm d ~mm:C:~ Pknm," ~ ~ ~ ~ ~m~ ~~. ~~~N~C~V~ ~B~D~V~ ~ ~~dk~~mm~~~m~n~~~~'';'~m~ ¶. t:NmENSRM:ENNDCt,;TTmlVATIONIdAPDES~NATION(m): Anprnv~H ~pecific Pl;n ,n l. LA~USEPI~Nt~ Soutl~west Territory Land Use Pl~nn~-o A~ ,L C01e&IiTYP(XJCYARE~I:Nf(: off Palomar 0bservatorv Street ~ighting Policies & CC~L.IiTYPL~FAI~: Southwest Area Plan (under study) l, C01AA~PLANDE~TICXimX ~Alff: 81jkIdARyOF~AFF~CTiNGFRCXm0SAJJThe comprehensive policies and Project desiqn component described in Specific Plan No. ~lq ~ ~F~pllr~hl~ tn thp project. More specifically, the focus of the applicable policies is on Planning Area 17, which encompasses the entire PrOPOSal. For ttl p, ,_ )m .'~. inidcmte wfi~ · ,yam (Y) or no (N) whether any public: families and/or matrices itsues may mignfficmntiy reflect mmmrkmd yes (Y), write data mem,m:m~, t~snc,~,s ~,fm'~in~s ~lact, mnd initiation measures under Secticm V. PUBUC FACIUTIES AND SERVICES 1. Y Ckq=ulmion(F1D.~V.l.lV.11. Dkctmsln 10JL... 8,c. VExiMk~Ramed&Requimcl R(w:ts) laa Tmls (Fig. IV.12 - IV.13) W,W(AgemylJUmN 8ew,r(Agen=ytaWs) Fire tmht:mm (IrGN. le-N.1B) Ihmmm .~r/m mm (Fig N. il - N.18) Idmok ~ W.17 - W. lm bed Wine (1~ N.I? - NAB) Pede end IkQeekn II~ NAB - N2O) ~N ,tY 11,.Y.__ Equeebian Trails Fig. IV.19 - W.24/ Fliv. Co. 800 Sc~e EOuenimn Tit Maps) utim~ (Flg. N25 - N.26) L.bades Frog. N.17 -N.18) Hem~ SenAte (Fig. IV.17 - N.18) Nrpe~ {iqg. L18.2 · IL18.4. 1.18,8 - mm18.10 & IV.27 - N.36) 15Y__ I:)tmamR,_rv ~,_lm 2. i)amdmWmlnlindY, lmfeF,--;-'vm'cmmismmtMIhmePolk:4M~~~%~N~~tmm~Nnmt. · ;,~l, m ,a,: _mm, edmant wm~le Cr,,,(x.mm'mMIve Genest Imam? If no(.e.q:dmdn: i IF,. ENVTRO~AL It'Ttill)S AND FIF, SOURCES ASSESSMENT (CA, tie One). This lilt; ,. -": A is Illoeeslry to d_ lw.,,i'j the ~ lind uee SUltanLilly ratings in SeCtion III.B. IWthe k,-.- ;":- Nl,eb. ,:lifilgmllefe~,,-,;ilnldktb~GeltldPtln- Fotlnytlluemlrkeciyes(Y)w~te eik~dall lixarOel, lk .: li CgmllJItl~~Of!lct l~l lnYmltj~ation mluurel ur~llrSeClicmV- Abo. whee inclicated, t2k'Nh. F_ {4,~t[IBrldllu~lbityOrfli:)blliXlplbityfllblg(s). (SeeCietb.~ltbottorriOllhilplge). HAZARD5 ~N ~ S PS U R 2. I:[B GrmandshakMgZone(RgVt.1) 4. Y & V1.12 · 1~84 AJCUZ Report M.A.F.B.) ,urdZoresiFi;Vt.1) t~ A B' C Fig, V1.~) tactm~F~U R Oqg- VL3) D ue Zone (Fig. V1.1) 13. N Railroad Noise (Fig. V1.13 - Vt.16) (F',e. v:.4~ ~4.__N (~ ~ · c o ~Fi;, w.~ Highway Noise (Fig. VI.17 - VL29) ()A B C D (Fig, V1.11) ~ S PS U R Rex:kraft Hazed (On-site hapecti~n) Expensive Sob (U.S.D.A. Soil Conservation Sevte t Surveys) Erosion (U.S.DA Soli Coneerva~n Sefvk:eSoaSu, veys) Wmd Ersoskxt&Blowsand(Fig. Vl.1, OrcL460,84ic. 14,2 & On:L,484) I)em lnundatm kea0:ig. Vl.7) 4~ U R Ok;- VIJ) 7. N 10N...~_ 15.__ 16. N 17. Y 18. Y 19._.~ 20. N 21. H 22.. N 23, N 24.__ 25.__ Other Noise NA A B C D (Fig, V1.11) Project Generated Noise Affecting Noise Selve Uses (Fig. Vt.11 ) Noise SereStirs Project (RG. %/1.11 ) Air Quality IrN~cts From Project Proje~.. Sensitive to Air QuaJity Water Qualily Impacts From Project Project Sensitive to Wlter Quality Hau,-clous Materisis and Wastes Hazardous Rre Ares (Fig. VI.30 - VL31) Other Other RESOURCES 27.__.. MorNearmAgricullumlPm~ 31. N Definitions for Land Use 84titability and Noise Acceptability Ratings NA - IMI AR:i~hll 8 - Germlfiy .Sue-~le PS - Plovlionslly Suitable U - Cmmlly~ R - Flel;btcld A - ~ly Acceptable 9- C,~a~,eV _i:f'~ll C - GetlMIIlyUr~jccl..ible D - I. anclUseDiscoumi~l 4 · V. IIFOFIMArION IOUFICEI, FINDINGS OF FACT AND MrI1G&I'ION MEASURES ADDITIONAL IIFC)RMATIQN REQUIRED BEFORE ENVIRONMENTAL. A$-P-J:SSMENT CAN BE COMPLETED: DATE DATE ADEQUACY ECTION/ IFC)RMA'rlON NFORMATION NFOFIMATION DETISqMNAl10N ISSUE NO. REQUIRED REQUESTED RECEIVED {YES/NO,DATE) B. For each illme marked yes (Y) under Sections III.B end W.B, klent~y lhe Sectjon end issue number and clo the ktowtng, inlhe formatks mhown belovr.. 1. Lift Idl Iddiliofad re.~ dltl Ioufces, including a~mckl~ Cee)luItad. 2. Slate all find'rags of fact regarding environmental cof~ems. 3. State specific mitigate measures. If idenUfisble without requiring an environmentat impact report (E.I.R.) 4. ff additional k'dormltjcm Is flclulred before the environmental useslment can be completecl, refer to Subsect';n A. 5. If addltiona/cheats el neeclm:l to complete this section, check the box at the end of the section and attach the ia=e lr, ry Iheets. SECTION/ ISSUE NO. IIIB.3 IIIB.4,B IIIB.17 SOURCES, AGENCIES CONSULTED, FINDINGS OF FACT, M~IGATION MEASURES: The General Plan designation for land use suitability pertaining to O~nUn~ha~nO ~ c,~t~hl~ Pnf~nt(al ~mi~art~ ran. hP m~tigatPd tn an acceptable level throuah conformance with the Uniform Building Code and County ordinances. Potential siqnificant impacts related to slopes and erosion includes the visual appearance of permanently altered land forms' severe erosion of unprotected slopes and possible slope instability. The potential impact pertaining to visual appearance is mitigated by Development Standards outlined in Section ))IA.6 of Specific Plan No. 219. The potential for erosion is being studied in a slope stability study and the development of specific requirements for alluvial/colluvtal removal at the tract stale. Temporary groundcover will be provided to prevent erosion during the construction phase a~ indicated in EIR No. 235. Potential noise impacts will be determined by noise studies to be rnndmmrt~d alnng rnadw~ty~- Mitigation will include heiqht of attention wall and any other reconmnended by the noise study. Monitoring and n~pnrtin~ i~ rp~HrPd. D. IMe'Peftoflselxz}ieclsltelsln'mnot~asOPenSIxce",mdlnotlnmC°mmm~,~te ,'W.'zak'ss 1, 2, 3, 6 and 7. Coral:ice ,1;_m mt~c:ns 4, 5, 6 and 7 I It is in · Community F'lan. 1. Land ~ ~L.,~'/(~) recmv-,y ~ maSx:wt the r,,.;osed Wolect A~ irda, Im~d (i.e. &,Vestal. Qr,,,,,m. 'd. er.) Cruxrant lend tie. meidentjl. AI~ Indi~te ind u. ty~ & ID.1 b~D2. wgt~~~ms:dvmd atlN~k~t nm~? Expi~: 4. Ccs'mTus'uty F'tsn designstiofXz): ~ tm 'lhe f..~ ~ ;onQslent wtth the Ix}licie~ ~d ~p~ ~ ~ ~mm~ I:'~? L btN s,,,vVC, SSJ css'npatible edlh existing end Ixolxecl Buffcling land uses? Ilncd, el/k~ 7. Based on Ca, inltiei Curly. Is IN ;,,.; ::mem omteitent with IN Con4x~ens~ Gene~ P~? I no&, _ A .~cm by Secl~ and ~ Numbe h:ee ~ ldmrkUfyk~ kx:ore~.l~!esT ~r~r~s~~pr~]~i~~kxn8~sndcQnssn/Nkx~desig~s.tk;m.c~:x~.~ie~the~cr~vin~: 1... ~mmml~mdmmig, m~m~s~ 2. Im ee ;.,.;_:~V QQsaIm dh Is Nemle'e~aXm)'/I ~ ~ Based en Ii Irdlld sludy, Is tse ix.;;:amlt ~.,,-,lleent wllh g'm ~ GenemJ Plan? Irml, ~'k.':! by Seclion and Issue llmtm em issues klentilying k',crlis/fic~' V. INFO MMATION IOUMCES, FINDINGS OF FAm~I' AND MITIGATION MEASURES (Gontlnued) IIIB.18 IIIB.26 TTTR.?A TVR 1 i1-15 8OURDE$,AGENCIESCONSULTED, FINDINGS OFFACT, MITIGA~ON MEASURES: A statement of overridinq findings was adopted by the Board of Supervisors for cumulative effects on air quality Which cannot be fully mitiaated. Although a small portion of the Site has soils suitable for agriculture based on the General Plan, it was determined in EIR No. 235 that there would be no significant impact due to the loss of agricultural land. The ~it~ i~ within the historic range of the Stephens' Kangaroo Rat. A biological report prepared for The Meadows Specific Plan (SP 219} indicated +h~f nnn~ nf thp ~pprip~ were located nn the ~it~ nf thp tract. Therefore, no mitiqation was required. Th~ ~,,~ h~v~ h~n d~r~m~d and ~ddrp~d in ~pprifir Plan Nn. 219. Correspondinq environmental review is thoroughly discussed in EIR rio. 235. Impacts have been reduced to an acceptable level. VL ENVIRONMENTAL. NPACT DETERMINATION: !l TIme ~ el reel lave · eignli:emt efleci m the mmwionment and a ~~ ~t~ ~y ~ CITY OF TEMECULA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT FINAL VESTING TRACT NO. 24135-3 DATE: November 23.1993 Streets and Drainage Water Sewer TOTAL Faithful Performance Security $ 308,000 69,500 70.000 $ 447,500 Material & Labor Security $ 154,000 34,750 35.000 $ 223,750 Maintenance Retention (10% for one year) (or Bonds if work is completed) $ 97.700 (Based on total improvements of $977,000) Development Fees Monument Security City Traffic Signing & Striping Costs RCFC Drainage Fee (N/A) Signalization Mitigation Fee - SMD #9 Road & Bridge Benefit Fee Other Developer Fees Checking & Insection Fees Plan Check Fee Inspection Fee Due Monument Inspection Fee Fee Paid to Date (Credit) Total Inspection/Plan Check Fees Due 35,500 0 0 14,550 0 0 $ 23,720,19 $ 32,065.39 $ 1,147.58 $ 56,933,16 $ 0 -4- pwl 5%agdrpt%93%24135-3.agn 1123 NOV-15-93 fi0~ 11:49 BNS C0STA rF_.SA FAX 140. 7147555648 P. 05 SOel'~ I 0 lAW OIPIrlCI~ IUI'I~ 41r,40 'CO~i'TA NIl, A, 'CALIFORNIA Ig~,"ll Octobez 28~ 1993 Nr. Bryon Noreen XRDC, INC. 27555 ~neZ Road Suite 200 Te~cula, CA 92591 Re: Paloma del Sol Develolment kJreesent xP~*_~tance of . Grant Deed for Park located in Planning 3trea 6 Dear Nr. Noreen: I Previouelyspoketoyourattorney, Basuel&lhadeff, regardlngCity accePtance ofthenslghborhoodpark located ~n Planning Area 6 of Palosadel Sol. Nr. Alhadeff suggested that Z ~o 'nicatedirectly vithyoU, Sections 12.5 and 12.6 of Develolmentk/reeaent provide that Xespervoulddevelop and grant in ~eeto the City an 8 acre park locatedwithin Planning~rea 37 (wPA--3?I). The park has now been completed, and Shawn Nelson, the Cmmunity Services DIrector, had orLginallyproposedtorecomsend acceptance oZ the grant deed at the October 26, 1993 CouncilMeeting. Hoeever, the. City discovered that there v as a $633,000 lien fros~ssessment District No. 159 (BAD 159m) on ParcelNo. 2 of ParcelNap 23432, latch Parcel includes the Park site. Nro Nelson asked Csaba Xo of your company to remove this encumbrance. When Itr, Xo refused, Nr. Nelson took the park acceptance of~ the October 26th ~genda, and delayed Indefinitely the planned November 1, 1993 openlng day ceremony for the park. 0n behalf ofthe City of ~e~ecula, Z amasking you to reconsldarthis decision and arrange for the ~rant of the park NOV-15-93 HON 11:50 P. 07 B~S COSTA HESA P~X NO. 7147555848 October 28, 1993 Page 2 On behalf of the City of Temecula, I am asking you to reconsider this decLsicm and arrange. for the grant of the park free o~ this encm~rance. ~xa basis of this request is as foilors: l. Section 12.5 of the Development Agreesmnt provides that Kenper is to grant the park in fee to the City. Civil Code Section 1113 provides that vhenevor a grant deed ks executat conveying a fee simple estate, there ks an biDlied covenant that at the time of execution, the estate is wfree from encumbrances done, made or suffered by the grantor, or any person claiming under hla. e Civil Code Section 1114 deZine8 -encumbrancesm to include #~axes, assessments and all liens upon real property.- ltr. Ko's teAreal to 'ali-dnate the AD 159 assessment lien violates this covenant to provide clear title. As this covenant is laplied An the Development Agreaent, failure to provide clear title also amounts to a breach of the Develolment Agreement, Failure of leaper to prOmp~l~ ante this breach by conveying title alear of t~e AD IS9 assesmerit lien Ray result the City initiating proaeedisgs to tarahate U~o Developaent lgreeaent o 2.. It is apparently Mr. Xo's contention that the City should be responsible foe the xq 159 lien because the creation of the park acreage resulted in a loss of developsent units. However, it now appears that the park will not prevent leader from achieving the 590 unit target density for P~-6. Develolment of Palm del Sol is governed by the Palm Del Sol Specific Plan ("SP"). Pk-6 of the BP, Amendment-No, l, had a target density of 590 units at a density of 15 du/acre spread over 37,8 acres, Amendment No, 3 of the SP provided for an 8 acre park and 492 units at a density of 16.5 du/acre spread over 29.8 aczes, upon reviewing this matter with the kssesssent District Engineer for XD 159, we learned that the actual total acreage of PA-l~ P&-6 and PA-37 is 83,Z3 acres, However, according to the Specific PIan, PA-1, PA-6 and PA-37 are cumllatlvely .74.2 acres. The difference between the two is 8,89 acres, This could yield an additional 146.69 dwelling units at 16.5 du/acre, or a total of 638.39 units in PA-6, NOV-IS-93 HON ]1:49 B~ C(B'TA HF. SA October 28# 3.993 Page 3 F~ NO. 7147555648 P. 06 It is my understanding that gemper my prefer to allocate (;him add~tional acreage to in~-.--re the patio to acres and increase the o0amerelal acreage in PA-1. Regardless# these additional acrH !woNride Fdmptr substantial development potential, and are the appropriate place for Xemp~r to reallocate the assessment lien, I suggest Kernper apply for an amendment to the 2P to add acreage to PA-x# PA-6 and PA-37 ~ad address the newly found 9 acres. 3. It has been the consistent Practice of the Assessment Engineer for AD 3.59 to reallocate auy assessment to e surrounding properties within the subdivision When a park has en added by the subdivider. A case in point is Parcel Nap 23432, ~hich originally created Palarea del Sol. When this Map vas recorded# the assessment was reallocated to remove any lien for each of the park sites mini school sites. The Emma practice should be applied hare. Moreover, in this case, reallocation is particularly appropriate given that the additional 9 acres will permit Kernper to maintain the same assessment per dwelling unit even after the assessant is reallocated. To this end# the city is applying to XD 159 to reallocate the assessment. 4. Finally, we have also discovered that there are other enctudn-an~es on the park. Car F-qula Way is a recorded street that has been realigned to abut the park. The recorded street runs through the park. Before the park my be accepted# lemper must apply for vecetion of aoldu Campanulm Way and dedication of the new alignment. Again, on bd:mlf of the City, and particularly the adults and children who will be users or this park, and to cure th~ breach of the Development Agreesent, I request that you arrange for the removal of the assessment lien from the park# and the realignment o~ Campanula Way. NOV-15-93 HO~ 11:51 BOS COSTA HESA P~X Net 7147555848 P. 08 October 28, 1993 Page · Please feel fee to call me if you have any questions or if I may be of further assistance. Sincerely, Scott F. Field Cit~ Attorney CITY OF ~ City Councilmebers David D~xon, City Manager Mr. ShawnNelson, Dire~co~o£ C= 'mityServices Dennis Xllmmek, Zsq. (per Section23 of theDevelolment Agreement) Dennis O'Netl, Esc~. (per 2e~xtlOn 23 of f-.heDavelopment Agreement) NOV-15-93 HON 11:47 BI, IS COSTA MESA F~ NO. 7147555648 P. 03 K~ Community Devdopment Company O~v~,itmot'r. en~r.e~SS4mnSe~ent~ 27555 Ynez Road. Subg2OR. Tanecuh. Califmnia92591,909/694-0666 · Fax: 9~91694=0749 November 4, 1993 Cily of 4~174 }~n.- Park Drive Temecnla, CA 92590 !~: PaJorn~ del Sol On Novmnbe~ 1, 1993, I received a letIra- from City Allrainy ~cott FJ, dd concerning padr localcd in Planning Area 6. In his _k~___, Mr. Field pmpu, ts to ,...~ref ent the Cty in advising ng _f~__t ~ I~nd'_er of th= subject Park will not be azeped with an~ AD 159 enchoftlzse issues. Mr. Fzld h~dicstes thst Imrsusnt ¢o Sectjim 12.5 of oar Dev~ A~ ~ the city, ]rgznVer is zequired to 'gnnt t~pazk" in fee mtbe City. very spe~r-,~-knpa~ rden~ to, 1~ ~ s!~ i,rr~ve, ~d owaer mYo~ ~ sssoc~-das shall d,,dhte, or csuseto~~infee...toCityandCityagteesWatz~pazkhnd,...- Sectionl2.8 provides that we are to tfans~ to the C~y this subject Park. The City xequeged frotn Ciba Ke of oar olBc~ that a gnmt deed be used. When Mr. Ko accepted the form of grant deed and prqmed the docnm~a~cm and mbmitml it to means that the ptopeny is to be "ft~ frmn _e~s, mbrss~," ~.w~l~ th~ ~,Je, ssm,~ district Ijcn. We can ~l]d lloffiing in ele Devd~ Agtt~tlQg, nor an~ of our file8, which clear of any ~,qse~zff~.-t lien. the City is under an affix'mati~ obligation to accept the Park and provide all of the credits we are entitled to. The only obligation placed upon Knnper was to provide the Park with cerlain improvements and then to transfer that Park to lhe City. Ptttmll~ to Section 12.5, fiz City is under affirmative obligation to now accept the Park. NOV-IS-93 HON ]1:48 P. 04 Mr. Dave Dixon Novemlx~ 4, 1993 Page2 B~S COSTA HESA F~X NO. 7 ] 47555848 I RESIt. I~'laTE IP~ildaln~k~r[ i I Development A~,Aucnt or that he believes it m'x4:.~,.a,~r the City "hid""""""""~o ptocccdln..as" to te-mi~teourDovelogme~'Ap,/~d Tbat~ndofmmctioneercainlydoemnotfurther Themmeeendrmscmfortdumingtoactz~_thetrm__f~_eroftlmPaxkxelal~wa contention by Mj:. l=~e,&ci~~ now has an n~Imlnnnl 8.89 mmm ove~which m Next, Mr. Field hxli,~es that the City is applying me A~r.m~r Distria 159 to "realloea~" the oms~t~c ,d . I have mhndy notified Mr. Pal Tt,~,,qm0n of Wdmb & owns. p~ ID resolve tl]lz C~p~nelm Way issue. We are in the ~ d ~~ ~ ~~ w~ Unless you cs, a advise me of any doctunentation or provide us any doc~s which lead to a contraxy ~ sta~ ~ Ihe City nmst accq~ the l~a~sf-~ of the Park u Sisztely, k~KPER COMMUNITY DBVEt~PMENT CO. ec: Scott Field, Esq.m/ Denois Kminn~m=, Ksq. Dennis O'Neil, Bsq. ITEM N O. 10 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Mary Jane McLarney, Finance Officer November 23, 1992 Award of Vehicle Purchase PREPARED BY: Luci Romero, Financial Services Administrator RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council award the purchase of the vehicle to Fuller Ford. The purchase price is $12,495, excluding tax. DISCUSSION: On October 7, 1993, the City sent out an Invitation to Bid on the purchase of a two-door extended cab two-wheel drive pick-up. The bid packets were mailed to 16 vendors. The deadline for receipt of the bids was November 4, 1993. Five bids were received, as follows: 1. Fuller Ford (Chula Vista) $12,495.00 2. Schumacher Auto Sales (Temecula) $12,582.15' 3. Paradise Chevrolet (Temecula) $15,103.50* 4. Norm Reeves Chrysler Jeep Dodge (Temecula) $15,741.00' 5. Associates Commercial Corp. (Texas) $25,000.00 * Price reflects 1% sales tax discount for City of Temecula vendors. The bid submitted by Fuller Ford meets the specifications and is the lowest bid. FISCAL IMPACT: The vehicle will be acquired as a capital asset through the Vehicle Internal Service Fund. In anticipation of the purchase of this vehicle, it has been included in the FY 1993-94 depreciation schedule payments. ITEM N O. 11 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Manager/City Council Mary Jane McLarney, Finance Officer November 23, 1992 Liability Insurance Renewal PREPARED BY: Luci Romero, Financial Services Administrator RECOMMENDATION: Approve the renewal of the City's Municipal General, Automobile, and Public Officials Errors and Omissions Liability insurance policy with Insurance Company of the West in the amount of $103,000 annual premium. DISCUSSION: The City's current liability insurance policy with Insurance Company of the West expires on December 1, 1993. Staff, in conjunction with the City's insurance broker, Mike Bush, who represents CaI-Surance, reviewed the options available from various municipal insurance carriers, including Planet, Crum & Forester, Cigna, Municipal Mutual, and Insurance Company of the West. Based upon this analysis, staff recommends renewal of the policy with Insurance Company of the West (ICW) at an annual premium amount of $103,000. ICW offers one of the broadest policy forms available; all of the other carriers provide at least one coverage on a claims made basis. ICW was also evaluated on the basis of knowledge of the industry; stability; and service. Additionally, ICW has provided responsive, quality service to the City over the past year. There are no changes in the policy, which calls for coverage of $1,000,000 plus $4,000,000 in excess coverage. The policy is written on an occurrence form and includes a $50,000 Self-Insured Retention (SIR) level. The Temecula Community Services District and the Temecula Redevelopment Agency are also named as insured. FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate funds for the premium amount have been appropriated in the Insurance Internal Service Fund, account number 300-199-999- 5200. .ITEM NO. 12 TO.' FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER~ CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECL LA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Scott F. Field, City Attorney November 23, 1993 Construction of Solana Way from Motor Car Parkway to Margarita Road RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the construction plans and specifications and authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit construction bids for the full width widening of Solana Way, including sidewalk on the southerly side, from Motor Car Parkway easterly to Margarita Road. BACKGROUND: The current widening of Ynez Road includes the improvement of a section of Solana Way from the intersection of Ynez Road easterly to Motor Car Parkway. The construction of this section of Solana Way is necessary for the optimum operation of the intersection of Ynez Road and Solana Way. However, the completion of Solana Way from Motor Car Parkway easterly to Margarita Road was not included by the City Council in the improvements to be constructed with the first bond sale and was not included in the Sales Tax Reimbursement Agreement. The Sales Tax Agreement for Ynez Road generally requires the property owner to pay the development related road cost (2 lanes), and the City to pay for the major thoroughfare cost ( 1 lane) through sales tax reimbursement. Staff is presently working with the owners abutting Solana Way to extend that same principle to the cost of extending Solana Way. A revised Sales Tax Reimbursement Agreement would provide that CFD 88-12 would fund the construction, but the property owners would not receive sales tax reimbursement for the cost of the improvements. If the additional construction were to be completed through a separate Public Works Contract, the competing bid process may reduce the construction cost and that additional time frame will allow for the negotiation of a Reimbursement Agreement with the property owners. If the property owners and the City fail to reach agreement, the Council has the option to reject all bids, build a specific section of the road, or fund the entire construction from a different funding source. It is anticipated that bids would be solicited during December, 1993 and construction would start in February, 1994. pwl 5%agdrpt%93%1123%solanawey.egn 112393 Alternatively, if the City Council elects to construct the remaining portion of Solana Way through a change order to the existing Ynez Road Contract (PW92-05), the funds for payment of the construction will need to be appropriated from unreserved General Fund Balance. Additionally, there is no mechanism currently in place to provide for reimbursement of those funds to the City. A change order has been negotiated with the City Contractor and it is attached for your review. As the Contractor is presently moving equipment off the job site, the final price may increase slightly. FISCAL IMPACT: Public Works Contract with funding through Community Facilities District 88-12 and a Sales Tax Reimbursement Agreement. A change order to the existing Ynez Road Contract would require an appropriation of _+_ $218,000 from Unreserved General Fund Balance. pwl 5%,aOdrpt%93%1123%eolanawey.egn 112393 ITEM NO. 13 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY ~ FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Shawn D. Nelson, Director of Community Services November 23, 1993 Operational Policies, Regulations and Fee Schedule for Indoor Facility Public Use. PREPARED BY: Herman D. Parker, Recreation Superintendent RECOMMENDATION: 1 ) Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ,_ ORDINANCE NO. 93- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING PARK AND RECREATIONAL FACILITY OPERATIONAL POLICIES AND REGULATIONS, ESTABLISHING GENERAL OPERATION POLICIES GOVERNING SPECIAL USE PARKS, AND REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 91-37 2) Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 93- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A REVISED FEE SCHEDULE FOR THE USE OF CITY PARKS BACKGROUND: The Community Services Department has opened the doors of the new Old Town Temecula Senior Center and will soon hold the grand opening of the Temecula Community Recreation Center. These new facilities have stimulated several requests for reservations and facility rentals. The attached ordinance establishes policies and regulations for outdoor parks, indoor City facilities, and special use parks used by the general public. The attached resolution adopts a fee schedule, by user group, for reserved use of outdoor parks, indoor facilities, group picnic ~-- facilities and special use parks. The revised park ordinance is identical to the earlier version, except for new policies concerning Special Use Parks (Section 2,5) and alcoholic beverages (Section 23). The revised fee schedule is identical to the earlier version, except for Indoor Fee and Special Use Park Fees. Copies of the proposed ordinance and the proposed resolution are attached for your review. FISCAL IMPACT: Fees collected for the rental of City facilities will assist in off-setting the cost of utility, custodial and upkeep expenses incurred by the Community Services Department. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEME.- CULA ADOFrlNG PARK AND ~TIONAL FACILITY POLIC~.S AND REGULATIONS ESTABLISHING GENERAL OPERA- TION POLICIES GOVERNING SPECIAL USE PARKS, AND REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 91-37 WItEREAS, the City Council of the City of Temecula has authority over the public parks and recreational facilities within the jurisdictional boundaries of the City of Temecula; and WHERFAS, the City Council may adopt regulations binding upon all persons governing the use of City parks and recreational facilities and property, and may deem a violation of any such regulation a misdemeanor; and WHEREAS, the City Council may identify Special Use Parks; and WIIEREAS, the City Council by adopting Ordinance No. 91-37 on October 8, 1991, adopted certain operational policies and procedures pertaining to park and recreational facilities; and WHEREAS, the City Council is now desirous of amending such adopted policies and procedures; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Ordinance No. 91-37 is hereby repealed. Section 2. Definitions: Definitions: The following words shall have the meaning indicated when used in these regulations: A. "Park" means any community park, neighborhood park, special use or any other recreational facility maintained by the City of Temecula. B. "Board" means the Board of Directon of the Temecula Community Services District, or any other person authorized by the Board, pursuant to hw, to act in its stead. Cs of Temecula. "Commission" means the Community Services Commission for the City I D. "Amplified sound" means music, sound wave, vibration, or speech projected or transmitted by electronic equipment, including amplifiers. E. "Knife or dagger" means any knife, or dagger having a blade of three inches or more in length; any ice pick or similar sharp stabbing tool; any straight-edge razor blade fitted to a handle. F. "Vehicle" means any device by which any person or property may be propelled, moved, or drawn, excepting a device moved by human power. G. "Vehicular travel" means travel by a vehicle. H. "DirecWr" means the Director of Community Services. Section 3. Rules and Regulations Applicable in City Parla: The following rules and regulations apply in all City parks, including Special Use Parks, unless expressly stated otherwise elsewhere in these reguhtions. Section 4. Duty to Comply: No person shall enter, be, or remain in any park unless he complies at all times with all of the City ordinances and regulations applicable to such park and with all other applicable hws, ordinances, rules and reguhtions. Section 5. ~:qual Opportunity: Any and all individuals shall be provided equal opportunity for the use of any park and any recreational program without regard to physical limitation, age, race, color, national origin, religion, political beliefs or sex. Section 6. Operation of Vehicles: A. Roads for Public Use: The provisions of the California Vehicle Code are applicable in the City parks upon any way or place of whatever nature which is publicly maintained and open to the use of the public for purposes of vehicular travel. All violations of said Vehicle Code shall be enforced and prosecuted in accordance with the provisions thereof. B. Surfaces Other than Roads for Public Use: Skateboards: No person shall drive or otherwise operate a vehicle in a park upon surfaces other than those maintained and open to the public for purposes of vehicular travel, except upon temporary parking areas as may be designated from time to time by the Commission, and further excepting vehicles in the service of the City, animal control vehicles, law enforcement vehicles, and motorized wheelchairs. No person shall ride or operate a skateboard in any designated City park unless that person is wearing a helmet, elbow pads, and knee pads. Any person failing to do so will be subject to citation under this Ordinance. ords~57 2 Section 7. Solicitation Prohibited: No person shall practice, carry on, conduct or solicit for any commercial occupation, business, or profession in any City park, or sell or offer for sale any food, beverage, merchandise, article, or anything whatsoever in any City park. This section shall not apply to any person acting pursuant to a conWaet with the City of Temecula or the Temecula Community Service. s District, or under a permit granted by the Commission or Director. Section 8. Prohibition of Animals in Park. No person shall cause, permit, or allow any animal owned or possessed by him, or any animal in his care, custody, or control to be present in any City park except: (A) Equine animals being led or ridden under reasonable control upon any bridle paths or trails provided for such purposes. (B) Equine or other nnimnl s which are hitched or fastened at a place expressly designated for such purpose. (C) Dogs or cats when led by a cord or chain not more than six (6) feet long, or when confined within the interior of a vehicle. (D) Dogs which have been specially trained and are being used by blind or disabled persons to aid and guide them in their movements. (E) Small pets which are kept on the person of the possessor at all times. (F) In connection with activities authorized in writing by the Commission. (G) Fowls or animals turned loose at the direction of the Commission. Section 9. Duty to Cnre for Animals: It shall be the mandatory duty of all persons owning, possessing, in control of, or otherwise responsible for a dog, cat, or an equine animal in a park to pwmptly collect, pick up, and remove all fecal matter left behind by said animal in or upon any park; provided, however, that this subsection shall not apply to guide dogs for blind or disabled persons or to equine animals on bridle paths. Section 10. Amplified Sound in Parks: (A) Purpose: The City Council enacts this legislation for the sole purpose of securing and promoting the public health, comfort, safety, and welfare of its citizenry. While recognizing that certain uses of sound amplifying equipment are protected by constitu- tional rights of free speech and assembly, the City Council nevertheless is permitted and obligated to reasonably reguhte the use of sound amplifying equipment in order to protect the correlative constitutional rights of the citizens of this community to privacy and freedom from the public nuisance of loud and unnecessary sound. 3 (B) Permit Required for Amplifiers: It shall be unlawful for any person to install, use, and operate within a park a loudspeaker or any sound amplifying equipment for the purposes of giving instruction, directions, tal~, addresses, or lectures, or of transmitting music to any persons or groups of persons in any park, or in the vicinity thereof, except when installed, used, or operated in compliance with one of the foliowing provisions: 1. By authorized law enforcement or the Director, or 2. Under a reservation or permit issued by the Director, and when operated in accordance with terms of said reservation or permit. (C) Granting and Denial of Permit: In determining whether to grant or deny a permit, the Director shall be guided by the foBowing considerations: 1. The constitutional free speech and assembly rights of all persons, including the applicant; persons in the park; property; 2. The possible effects upon the peaceable passage or presence of 3. The potential for disorder or unlawful injury to persons or 4. The potential invasion of other persons' rights of privacy; 5. The possible unlawful breach or disturbance of the peace; and 6. Any actual conffict with other scheduled park uses or events. The Director shall not deny a permit on the basis of any dislike for or disagreement with the content of any proposed talks, addresses, lectures, or musical presentations. The DirecWr may, however, deny a permit for any such events which are designed for the purpose of advocating imminent lawless conduct. (D) Power Source for Amplifiers: Amplifiers permitted in parks shall be operated only through a power source provided by the City, a battery, or a generator. Section 11. Prohibition of Firearms. Fireworla. and Toy Weapons: No person shall carry or discharge firearms, firecracken, rockets, torpedoes, or other types of explosives, or carry or discharge any gun, or pistol, or any sling shot or similar device, or any bows and arrows, or any other object capable of propelling a projectile, or carry or use any object calculated to make a noise sufficient to disturb the peace or quiet of the park, or bring into any park any of the above objects or articles. Fireworks may be permitted for special events 4 only with formal approval from the Community Services Commission and the Fire Depart- ment. Section 12. Prohibition of Dangerous Weapons: The provisions of the California Dangerous Weapons' Control Law are applicable in City parks and shall be enforced and prosecuted in accordance with the provisions thereof. No person shall carry on his person, in plain view, any knife with a blade in excess of 3 inches. Daggers are strictly prohibited. Section 13. Exceptions to Applicability: The provisions of Section 12 shall not be deemed to prohibit the carrying of ordinary tools or equipment for use in a lawful occupation or for the purpose of lawful recreation. Section 14. Dama~inff Property: No person shall cut, break, injure, deface, or disturb any tree, shrub, plant, rock, building, cage, pen, monument, fence, bench, or other structure, apparatus, or property, or pluck, pull up, cut, take, or remove any shrub, bush, plant, or flower, or mark or write upon, paint, or deface in any manner any building, monument, fence, bench, or other structure within any City park. Section 15. Damnt, ing l ~nd: No person shall cut, dig, or remove any wood, tuff, grass, soil, rock, sand, gravel, or ferlilizer within any City park unless approved by the Director of Community Services. Section 16. Golf: No person shall phy or practice the game of golf, including chipping, putting, driving or any other type of phy or practice which includes the hitting of golf or similar type ball with a golf or similar type club within any City park. Section 17. Water: No person shall swim, fish in, bathe, wade in, release pet animals in, or pollute the water of any fountain, pond, lake, stream, or reservoir within any City park except by permission of the Commission. Section lg. Fires and Fire, places: No person shall kindle a fire within any City park except in fireplaces provided for that purpose or in barbecues approved by the Commis- sion, except by permission of the Director. Section 19. Waste l .iquids and Refuse: No person shall wash dishes, or empty salt water or other waste liquids, or leave garbage, cans, bottles, papers, or other refuse anywhere in any City park other than in the receptacles provided therefor. Section 20. Loitering at Night: No person shall be or remain in any City park between the hours of eleven (11:00) o'clock p.m. and six (6:00) o'clocic a.m. of the following day without permission of the Director. The pwvisions of Sections 26 and 27 shall govern the granting or denial of such permission. onis~57 Section 21. Meetings: No person shall hold any meeting, service, sporting event, concert, exercise, parade or exhibition in any City park without first obtaining a Use Permit from the Director. The provisions of Sections 26 and 27 shall govern the issuance or denial of a permit under this Section. Section 22. Alcoholic Beverages: A. No person shall consume any alcoholic beverage within any City park, unless formally approved by the Commission. B. (1) Notwithstanding the above, the sale or consumption of alcoholic beverages at any indoor City public facility is permitted only with approval of the Director. A temporary license from the California Dcpamnent of Alcoholic Beverage Control, and proof of $1,000,000.00 (one million dollars) liquor liability insurance coverage and liability insurance coverage identifying the City of Temecula as additional insured is also required. (2) No person under the age of 21 is permitted to consume alcoholic beverages in any City park or facility. (3) Security may be required for events in which alcohol is served, depending upon the type of event at the discretion of the Director. C. Sale and Consumption of Alcoholic Beverages in Special Use Parks. (1) No person or organization shall sell or consume alcoholic beverages in a Special Use Park, unless formally approved by the Director of Community Services. (2) Alcoholic beverages must be consumed in designated areas. (3) A temporary license from the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control, $1,000,000.00 (one million dollars) liquor liability insurance and liability insurance identifying the City of Temecula as additional insured is also required. (4) No person under the age of 21 (twenty-one) is permitted to consume alcoholic beverages in any Special Use Park. (5) Security will be required for events in which alcohol is sold, as well as events where alcohol is not served. ords~57 6 Section 23. Controlled Substances: The provisions of the California Uniform Controlled Substances Act are applicable in City parks and shall be enforced and prosecuted in accordance with the provisions thereof. Section 74. Glass Containers: City park. No person shall possess any glass container in any Section :25. Flying Balloons or Planes: No person shall use any City park as a primary launch site for hot air balloons unless formally approved by the Commission. Motorized airplanes, and gliders are prohibited on any City park site. Section 26. Use Policies: A. Reserved Use: Reserved use (defined as exclusive, permitted use for one or more occasions) of parks shall require obtaining a *Use Permit* in a form established by the Director of Temecula Community Sentices (*District*). The City Council may establish use fees by Resolution. B. Unreserved Use: Use of all parks, except for special use parks, will be based on first come, first serve basis. No "Use Permit" is required for this purpose. If a user group wishes to reserve the use of a park, a "Use Permit" shall be required, with all applicable fees, rules, regulations, terms and conditions enforced. C. Multiple Park Reservations: If more than one recreational facility is reserved (e.g., two sports fields), applicable fees and deposits shall be charged for each park reserved. D. Sponsored Uses: Any City sponsored or co-sponsored reserved use shall be deemed a use for City purposes, and shall be exempt from all fees, deposits and permit requirements. Such determination shall be made by the Director. E. User Gwups: User groups designations shall be used to establish or form the basis variable fee schedules for use permits. The following User Groups are hereby established. activities. Gwup I - TCSD-sponsored or co-sponsored leisure and recreational Group H- Youth groups conducting non-profit youth oriented sports activities, and non-profit athletic/civic organizations conducting community oriented leisure or sports activities. ords~7 7 Group HI - Base standard rate for community users on a non-profit basis. Group IV - Profit making, commercial businesses or non-resident organizations conducting activities that are for profit and are either open or closed to the public. F. Recurring Use: Recurring use is generally defined as uses of parks on a regularly scheduled basis for more than one occasion (i.e, leagues, etc. ) G. Nonrecurring Use: Nonrecurring use is generally defined as use on a one time only or special event basis (i.e., annual picnic, parties or company sponsored events). A fee and permit are required only when reserved use by an organization is requested. H. Exemption: Due to special or unusual circumstances, the Community Services Commission may exempt user groups H, HI and IV from fees for the use of recreational facilities. It is the responsibility of the specific user group to formally request exemption from the Community Services Commission. The request should stipulate the special or unusual circumstances that necessitate exemption. I. Scheduling Priorities: Scheduling priorities shall be by user groups as indicated previously with Group I having precedence over H, Group H over HI, etc. In the event of conflict, the Director reserves the right to schedule any group. Scheduling of reserved uses will be carried out by the Director or his/her designee in a fair and equitable manner, to serve the leisure and recreation needs of the citizens of the City. J. Sports Field and Facility: It is recognized that recreational facilities and sports fields vary in type and location. However, fee schedules shall generally apply equally to all sports fields and facilities depending on the levei of service required for any individual facility. K. Fee Payment: User Permit fees are due and payable at the City of Temecula offices 72 hours prior to the use of the Park. Charges assessed for damages and grounds cleanup shall include only City's actual cost and are due and payable upon demand to the user. When fees are due and payable at the time a permit is issued, refunds are permitted if suffxcient notice is given to the City upon cancellation with five (5) working days notice for nonrecurring groups. L. Sales and Uses: User groups, desiring to use park for fund-raising purposes shall be allowed to do so subject to generally applicable policies and fees. Food concessionaires and other uses which are determined by the Director to be solely a commer- cial undertaking, and without educational, recreational or cultural benefit to the community, shall be selected pursuant to City public bidding procedures. ords~57 8 M. Inclement Weather: Inclement weather is generally defined as weather which, in the judgment of the Director, has left parks in a condition which, if the parks are used, presents a risk of damage to the parks or injury to users. The Director shall have the authority to deny use of all or any portion of a park to a user based on inclement weather. The Director reserves the exclusive right to determine that a park use is precluded by inclement weather, and no refund of fees shall be made on grounds of bad weather or field condition unless the Director makes such determi- nation. N. nenial of Facility Use: The Director shall have the authority based on cause to deny use of all or any portion of a park to any group or individual who has abused the privilege of park use as included in but not limited to the general policies and rules governing the use of parks. O. Ijability Insurnnce: (1) All user groups conducting reserved sporting or special event activities that will attract fifty (50) or more patrons (i.e., tournaments, clinics, fairs, festivals, concern, performances, camps, etc.) will be required to provide the Director with a certificate of insurance in the amount of one million dollars ($1,000,000.00) naming the City of Temecuh and the Temecula Community Services District as additional insured. (2) Insurance for Special Use Parks. (a) All user groups are required to provide the Director wiffi an insurance policy and an original certificate of general liability insurance in the amount of one million dollars ($1,000,000.00) naming the City of Temecula as additional insured which is subject to review and approval by the City Risk Manager. Co) Vendor' s liability, liquor liability and Worker 's Compen- sation Insurance may also be required, at the discntion of the City Risk Manager. P. General Compliance: User groups agree to comply with all applicable governmental agencies' ordinances, statutes and regulations and to assume full responsibility for payment of all sales use and possessory interest taxes. Section 27. Reservations for Special Use parks: A. The City Council may designate by resolution Special Use Parks. Special Use Parks are closed to the public except by Use Permit. ords~57 9 B. Any event or activity sponsored or co-sponsored by the City of Temecula shall have reservation precedence over any other interim event or activity that has requested the use of a Special Use Park. C. No event will be scheduled which is in conflict with another event. D. All event applications must be approved by the Director. Any event which will place a major impact on the Special Use Permit may be subject to Commission approval. E. An application for use of a Special Use Permit must be completed, signed and submitted ninety (90) calendar days prior to the event date. prior to use. All insurance requirements and fees must be submitted thirty (30) days G. If the appropriate apph'cation, fees, deposits and insurance have not been received by the City within thirty (30) days prior to the event, the City reserves the right to cancel said event. H. The City reserves the right to enter and inspect Special Use Permit at any time. The user group is required to pwvide the City with appropriate information and credentials for such purposes. I. The City will not be responSible under any circumstances for the property or equipment of the user group or his/her exhibitors, concessionaires, employees or entertainment. J. The City reserves the right to refuse or cancel the use of Special Use Park site if an event or activity is deemed unsuitable in nature, or may cause undue or unusual damage to the facilities. K. Events will be booked within a twelve (12) month period. Any event scheduled beyond a twelve (12) month period will be considered tentative unless a lease agreement has been approved by the City Council. L. Returning user groups in good standing with the City shall have first option for the use of facilities with corresponding days from year to year unless a separate lease agreement has been approved by the City Council. M. The scheduling of events on the following holidays will be considered on a case by case basis and at the discretion of the Director: Independence Day, Thanksgiv- ing, day after Thanksgiving, Christmas Eve, Christmas Day, New Year's Eve, New Year's Day, Easter, and other holidays. onls~7 10 Section 28. Certification: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause the same to be posted in the manner prescribed by law. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this__ day of ,199~. ATTEST: J. S~Munoz, Mayor June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMECULA) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance __ was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the day of , and that thereaft~, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council on the day of , by the following roll call vote: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: June S. Greek, City Clerk ords~5 7 11 RESOLIrrlON NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A REVISED FEE SCHEDULE FOR THE USE OF CITY PARKS WHEREAS, the City of Temecula desires to provide public access to indoor and outdoor city recreation facilities and to Special Use Park sites and recreation facilities; and WHEREAS, to help defray costs associated with providing the required staffing, utility costs, maintenance, and other services at such facilities, it is necessary to establish fees to reimburse the City for its operational expenses; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Temecula may establish by Resolution a Fee Schedule for the use of City parks; NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby resolve, determine, and order as follows: Section 1: The revised fee schedule for Indoor Facility Use, attached hereto as Exhibit "A" is hereby adopted. Section 2: The fee schedule for Outdoor Facility Use, attached hereto as Exhibit "B" is hereby adopted. Section 3: The fee schedule for Special Use Park sites, attached hereto as Exhibit "C" is hereby adopted. Section 4: The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOFrED this day of , 1993. ATTEST: J. Sal Munoz, Mayor June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] R:X~,o, X295 I STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) CITY OF TEMECULA) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of Temecula DO I-IFJF-RY CERTIFY that Resolution No. 93-__ was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the day of , 1993, by the foilowing vote: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: CO~CK,MEMBERS: ABSENT: CO~CII,MEMBERS: June S. Greek, City Clerk R:~P, eos~295 2 EXHIBIT City of Temecula Community Services Department I. Indoor Use Indoor Reserved Use: 1. All reserved use of public recreational facilities requires review and approval of a "Facility Request Form" by City staff. Facility Request Forms may be obtained at Temecuh City Hall, located at 43174 Business Park Drive. Requests must be submitted at least seven (7) working days prior to the intended use and all appropriate fees must be paid at the time of the request. 2. Facility Use Permits shall be issued only to responsible adults, age 21 years or older, who must comply with all rules and regulations. Such person is responsible for payment of all applicable charges and must be present at the function for which use is authorized. 3. A refundable cleaning deposit of $100 may be required with the completed request and applicable fees, depending upon the use of indoor facilities. Upon receipt, the facility will be reserved for the applicant pending it's availability and review by City staff. The deposit will be returned if the facility is found to be in a condition similar to it being found immediately before the activity. The applicant may expect the returned deposit, or an appropriate portion thereof, within twenty (20) working days after the scheduled event. Should repairs to the facility be necessary that exceed the funds deposited, the City will hold the applicant financially responsible for such repairs. 4. No facility shall be scheduled more than six (6) months in advance. 5. Facilities are provided "as is" with limited support items. A preview of the facility will be encouraged before a request is submitted to ensure facilities meet applicant's needs. 6. A $5.00 processing fee will be levied by the City if an applicant cancels reservations within five (5) days of the event. 7. Until the required Facility Request Form, cleaning deposit, rental fees, required insurance, and other requirements are received by the City, the City shall have the right to cancel the applicants request. All required insurance verifications must be submitted at least seventy-two (72) hours prior to the use of the facility. R:~nmsN295 3 8. The City retains the right to deny any building utilization request that is inconsistent with the goals and policies of the City Council of the City of Temecula, Community Services Department. 9. The applicant is responsible for all set-up and clean-up. Necessary clean- up not performed by user will be conducted by the City and applicable costs will be assessed to the user's cleaning deposit. 10. All use is restricted to the day of rental. A facility will not bc available for set-up the day before, or clean-up the day after use without additional fees. 11. User must comply with instructions of City employee(s) on duty or risk immediate eviction from public premises. All noise, music amplification, etc. must be kept at a reasonable sound level as determined by security or the staff person on duty. The City staff member may cancel a function at any time if persons involved in the function are not conducting themselves in a lawful manner and/or are causing damage to City property. The authorized applicant is responsible for the supervision and actions of those in attendance. 12. The City is not responsible for any lost or stolen articles. 13. No City equipment or furnishings shall be removed from the premises. 14. Decorations must be approved prior to installation and must be removed immediately after event. All decorations must be of a flameproof material. No nails, tacks, tape or other materials considered harmful or defacing to building is permitted. 15. The City may require security personnel at applicant's expense on functions deemed necessary or in the best interest of the City. 16. All admission fees charged by the applicant require City approval. Additional permits or licenses may be required. City of Temecula Community Services Department Fee Schedule INDOOR FACILITY USE GROUP I TCSD-Sponsored or co-Sponsored leisure and recreational activities. FACILITY: KITCHEN SMALL lViF-~'ING ROOM LARGE MEETING ROOM SMALL MULTI-PURPOSE ROOM LARGE MULTI-PURPOSE ROOM GYMNASIUM AMPHITHEATER SMALL PICNIC (49 PARTICIPANTS OR LESS) LARGE PICNIC (50-100 PARTICIPANTS) No Charge No Charge No Charge No Charge No Charge No Charge No Charge No Charge No Charge ~ R:~eo~95 5 City of Temecula Community Services Department Fee Schedule INDOOR FACILITY USE GROUP H Youth groups conducting non-profit youth oriented sports activities, and non-profit athletic/civic organizations conducting community oriented leisure or sports activities. FACILITY: KITCHEN $ 5.00/3 Hour Min. $ 3.0 0 e a. add'l. hour SMALL MEETING ROOM LARGE MEETING ROOM $10.00/3 Hour Min. $15.00/3 Hour Min. $5.00 ca. add'l. hour $6.00 ea. add'l. hour SMALL MULTI-PURPOSE ROOM LARGE MULTI-PURPOSE ROOM $ 20.00/3 Hour Min. $ 25.00/3 Hour Min. $6.00 ca. add'l. hour $7.00 ca. add'l. hour GYMNASIUM $ 20.00/3 Hour Min. $5.00 ca. add'l. hour AMPHITHEATER: No Entry Fee Entry Fee $ 20.00/3 Hour Min. $ 75.00/3 Hour Min. $5.00 ea. add'l. hour $20.00 ea. addq. hour SMALL PICNIC (49 PARTICIPANTS OR LESS) $ 15.00/4 Hour Min. $5.00 ea. add'l. hour LARGE PICNIC (50-100 PARTICIPANTS) $ 25.00/4 Hour Min. $6.00 ea. add'l. hour R:Xte.,oaX295 6 ~' City of Temecula Community Services Department Fee Schedule INDOOR FACILITY USE GROUP HI Base standard rate for community users on a non-profit basis. FACILITY: KITCHEN SMALL MEETING ROOM LARGE MEETING ROOM SMALL MULTI-PURPOSE ROOM LARGE MULTI-PURPOSE ROOM GYMNASIUM AMPHITHEATER: No Entry Fee SMALL PICNIC (49 PARTICIPANTS OR LESS) LARGE HCNIC (50-100 PARTICIPANTS) Minimum 3 Hour Use $10.00/3 Hour Min. $ 25.00/3 Hour Min. $ 30.00/3 Hour Min. $ 75.00/3 Hour Min. $ 90.00/3 Hour Min. $100.00/3 Hour Min. $100.00/3 Hour Min. $ 30.00/4 Hour Min. $ 50.00/4 Hour Min. $7.00 ca. add'l. hour $8.00 ea. add'l. hour $10.00 ea. add'l. hour $15.00 ea. add'l. hour $20.00 ca. add'l. hour $20.00 ea. add'l. hour $'20.00 ea. add'l. hour $10.00 ea. hour $12.00 ea. add'l. hour City of Temecula Community Services Department Fee Schedule INDOOR FACILITY USE GROUP IV Profit making, commercial businesses or non-resident individuals and organizations conducting activities that are for profit and are either open or closed to the public. FACILITY: KITCHEN SMALL MEETING ROOM LARGE MEETING ROOM SMALL MULTI-PURPOSE ROOM LARGE MULTI-PURPOSE ROOM GYMNASIUM AMPHITHEATER: No Entry Fee Entry Fee SMALL PICNIC (49 PARTICIPANTS OR LESS) LARGE PICNIC (50-100 PARTICIPANTS) $ 40.00/3 Hour Min. $ 50.00/3 Hour Min. $ 60.00/3 Hour Min. $150.00/3 Hour Min. $180.00/3 Hour Min. $200.00/3 Hour Min. $200.00/3 Hour Min. $375.00/3 Hour Min. $ 60.00/4 Hour Min. $100.00/4 Hour Min. $10.00 ea. add'l. hour $16.00 ea. add'l. hour $20.00 ea. add'l. hour $30.00 ea. add'l. hour $40.00 ea. add'l. hour $40.00 ea. add'l. hour $40.00 ea. add'l. hour $45.00 ea, add'l. hour $20.00ea. hour Ruo,326 8 EXHIBIT "B" City of Temecula Community Services Department Fee Schedul~ OUTDOOR FACILITY USE Fee Payment: The fees applicable to the use of facilities are contained heroin and are due and payable at the TCSD office (72) hours prior to the use of that facility. H. Outdoor Use GROUP I H HI IV Softball/Baseball Field* No Field Preparation No Lights Lighted 0 0 0 12.00 0 5.00 12.00 20.00 Soccer/Football Field* No Field Preparation No Lights Lighted 0 0 0 12.00 0 5.00 12.00 20.00 Tournaments/Sports Clinics (per field per day) No Field Preparation 0 0 75.00 150.00 4. A $5.00 Administrative fee will be charged for processing refunds! Individuals who do not reside within the boundaries of the City of Temecula registering for a TCSD sponsored activity or facility will be subject to a $10.00 per person non-residency fee. Fees listed heroin are on an hourly basis per group, per field unless otherwise noted. R:Xre4oaX295 9 Payment for Special Use Parks A. All fees and deposits must be submitted to the City of Temecula prior to the user group's event. Should the user group fail to submit all required payments and insurance, the City reserves the right to cancel the reservation or event. B. Contracts of $2,500.00 or more require a 30% non-refundable deposit due ten (10) working days from the date the contract is issued. The full balance is due and must be paid thirty (30) days prior to the event. Contracts of less than $2,500.00 require a 50% non-refundable deposit due ten (10) working days from the date the contract is issued. The full balance is due and must be paid thirty (30) calendar days prior to the event. C. The terms 'set-up' or 'tear down' shall include the use of the facility for moving in and out equipment, and preparation of the facility for performance of an event or activity. The charge for these periods is 15 % of the daily rental cost of the facility per day. This fee may be adjusted for Group Two user Groups. D. The charge for use of the facility shall apply to the periods of occupancy of the facility between the hours of 6:00 a.m. and 12:00 midnight. No event shall be permitted to continue after 12:00 midnight unless agreed in writing and approved by the Director of Community Services. E. All rental requests require a security deposit of 25 % of the one day facility rental fee to ensure the facility and equipment are left in good condition. Security deposits are a guarantee against loss, damage or maintenance required to restore the facility to the condition it was prior to the event. The user group is responsible for all clean-up, and failure to comply will result in the forfeiture of the deposit. F. A $25.00 fee will be charged on any check returned to the City for any reason. The individual or organization shall then be required to pay all rental fees and deposits by cash, cashiers check or money order. G. All costs deemed necessary and incurred by the City on behalf of a user group will be billed. City of Temecula Community Services Department Fee Schedule Special Use Park Sites Group I TCSD-sponsored or co-sponsored leisure and recreational activities 6:00 a.m. to 12:00 midnight Group H No Charge Youth groups conducting non-profit youth oriented sports activities, and non-profit athletic/civic organizations conducting community oriented leisure or sports activities. 6:00 a.m. to 12:00 midnight GroUp m Base standard rate for community users on a non-profit basis. 6:00 a.m. to 12:00 midnight $375.00 per day and any fees negotiated by contract. $525.00 per day and any fees negotiated by contract Group IV Profit making, commercial business or non-resident individuals and organizations conducting activities that are for profit and are either open or closed to the public. $900.00 per day and any fees negotiated by contract 6:00 a.m. to 12:00 midnight R:~tso,~.95 11 ITEM NO. 14 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: PREPARED BY: APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council Tony Elmo, Building Official November 23, 1993 Regulation of Vehicle Parking to Conform with Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Program (AVA) Requirements of City Clerk June S. Greek BACKGROUND: The staff will finalize a staff report on this item and forward it to you under separate cover. JSG ITEM NO. 15 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY ~ FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council June S. Greek, City Clerk November 9, 1993 Resolution Requesting Consolidation With November Election in Odd- numbered years. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 93- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA IN SUPPORT OF THE CONSOLIDATION OF ALL LOCAL, NON-PARTISAN ELECTIONS IN NOVEMBER OF ODD-NUMBERED YEARS BACKGROUND: The Riverside County Registrar has requested that all of the non-partisan elections which are currently consolidated with the November General Elections in even- numbered years be moved to November of odd-numbered years. The purpose of this is to effect cost savings by reducing the size of the ballots and the number of issues to be voted upon. Registrar Frank Johnson is seeking a "cooperative realignment" of the municipal and other non-partisan elections currently scheduled to be held in November of 1994. Included in the realignment would be Special Districts, School Districts, Water Districts and 24 cities in Riverside County. The Registrar's Office proposes to group the ballots by regions (Attachment A). Some of the advantages of the proposed realignment are: Cities scheduled for elections in 1994 and 1996 would defer election costs for one year and at that time could realize cost savings of from 20% to 55%. R:'aOendaj'pt%Odd Year Celtion RIme Agenda Report - Resolution Requesting Election Consolidation in Odd-Numbered Years November 9, 1993 Page 2. Regional elections would be created allowing concentration by office seekers on matters of regional/local concern. Existing resources could be utilized rather than having to increase personnel and equipment. (At the County Registrar's Office) 4. Future cost increases would be lessened and would be more controllable. Disadvantages of the proposal are: The anticipated turn-out for regional elections would be 40% to 50% of the electorate. The average for general elections has been averaging 70%. All of the jurisdictions must agree to this proposal to effect the projected cost savings. The proposed odd-year consolidation would extend the terms of office of all members by one year. Three of the five members of the City Council would have their terms extended from 1996 to 1997 as shown in Attachment B. The City Council seats of Councilmembers Birdsall and Parks will be scheduled for re-election at the November, 1994 General election since these two positions have already been extended once. The elections code only permits one extension of a term, for no more than twelve months. Therefore, the two council seats that are filled at the November, 1994 election would be up for re-election in 1999. The Riverside County Board of Supervisors approved the recommendation of the Registrar of Voters to seek a cooperative realignment on April 20, 1993. The request is that the cities involved adopt a resolution, as presented in this staff report, by December 1, 1993. If the cities in the County who are included in this proposal support it unanimously, the election ordinance will have to be amended. If there is not sufficient support, the change will not go forward· FISCAL IMPACT: The County Registrar has projected savings could be approximately $3,400. to 9,300. per election for a city the size of Temecula. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution Supporting Consolidation in Odd-numbered Years Proposed Election Consolidation by Region Realignment Schedule of Election Newspaper Articles JSG R:~egene,em~Odd Yee' Cemeidetien Reee 2 RESOLUTION NO. 93- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF TE1VIECULA IN SUPPORT OF THE CONSOLIDATION OF ALL LOCAL, NON-PARTISAN ELF~CTIONS IN NOVEMBER OF ODD-NUMBERED YEARS WHEREAS, the Registrar of Voters presently conducts elections for substantially all the municipalities and special districts in the County of Riverside in conjunction with e.lection of statewide partisan offices in November of even-numbered years; WHEREAS, the cost of conducting such non-partisan elections in conjunction with statewide partisan offices in November of the even-numbered years has increasingly escalated; WHEREAS, substantial cost reductions could be achieved and passed on to municipalities and special districts if their elections were conducted separately from statewide partisan elections; WHEREAS, on April 20, 1993, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Riverside endorsed the Registrar of Voters' proposal for a cooperative realignment of the election cycle, to create two election cycles: statewide partisan offices in November of the even-numbered years and local non-partisan offices in November of the odd-numbered years; WHEREAS, the purpose of such a cooperative realignment is to achieve the lowest possible cost for conducting elections; WHEREAS, the cost benefits of such a cooperative alignment may only be realize if all of the municipalities and special districts in Riverside County choose to conduct their non-partisan elections in November of odd-numbered years; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DECLARED, DETERMINED AND ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. By adoption of this Resolution, the City Council of the City of Temecula indicates its support for the cooperative realignment of the election cycle into tow election cycles: statewide partisan offices in November of the even-numbered years and local non- pardsan offices in November of the odd-numbered years. However, City Council support for such a cooperative realignment is conditional upon all other municipalities and special districts in Riverside County joining in such a cooperative realignment. Section 2. The Registrar of Voters of the County of Riverside is hereby requested to notify the City Clerk of the City of Temecula if and when other municipalities and special districts within the County have indicated their support for such cooperative realignment of the election cycle. Upon such notification, it is the intent of the City Council of the City of Temecula to adopt an ordinance pursuant to Government Code Section 36503.5 requesting R:~Rcsos~38Co) consolidation of its municipal election with an election to be conducted in November of odd- numbered years. Section 3. It is further the intent of the City Council of the City of Temecula, if consolidation in November of odd-numbered years is accomplished, to extend the terms of all current office holders by no more than twelve (12) months, except the terms of current office holders whose terms were previously extended pursuant to City Ordinance No. 89-10 shall not be extended any further, but rather their election shall be conducted in November 1994. Section 4. The City Clerk is directed to forward this Resolution to the Board of Supervisors of the County of Riverside and shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution and enter it into the book of original Resolutions. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED on this 23rd day of November, 1993. J. S. Mu~oz, Mayor ATr~T: June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] RAResos~338Co) 0 wo~8,~ CITY OF TEMECULA 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 Attachment "B" Contact: June Greek, City Clerk Telephone: (909) 694-1989 CURRENT STATUS Current Election Date - November 8, 1994 Nomination Period: July 18, 1994 - August 12, 1994 Councilmember: Term Endino: Pat Birdsall Ron Parks No later than 12/2/94 No later than 12/2/94 Current Election Date; November 5, 1996 Nomination Period: July 15, 1996- August 9, 1996 Councilmember: Term Endino: J. Sal Mu~oz No later than 12/3/96 Ron Roberrs No later than 12/3/96 Jeffrey E. Stone No later than 12/3/96 FUTURE RECURRENT ELECTIONS Proposed Election Date: November 8, 1994 Nomination Period: July 18 - August 12, 1994 Councilmember: Term Endino Pat Birdsall Ron Parks Proposed Election Date: November 4, 1997 Nomination Period: July 14, 1997- August 8, 1997 No later than 12/2/99 No later than 12/2/99 Councilmember: Term Endino J. Sal Mu~oz Ron Roberrs Jeffrey E. Stone No later than 12/2/97 No later than 12/2/97 No later than 12/2/97 REFERENCE: Government Code Section 36503.5 authorizes cities to change the date of their general municipal election. Terms of current officeholders would be increased by 12 months if city changes election date from November even-year to November odd-year. ACTION REQUIRED: Resolution requesting change of election date should be submitted to the Registrar of Voters for forwarding to the Board of Supervisors by December 1, 1994. R:%Election.94~terms B-Z0 · Thursday, September 16, Igg3 · THE PP, F_,S~ENTERm~ · ~, · County registrar to ask that all local elections move to odd years By ~ean The Prem, Enterprue · Riverside County Registrar of Voters Frank Johnson Is preparing to launch n campaign to ask cities and omer local jurisdictions to move their elections to odd'num- bered years. County. state and federal elec- tions would con,nue in even-num- bered yean. while regional and locnl elections would be held in --- odd-numbered years. That would ease pressure on voters, many of whom encoun- tered a lO-card, 20-sided ballot in 1990 because maay local elections were consolidated with statewide balloting, Johnson said. "We got a lot of communications from people wantlag to know ff everybody had ItsIt their minds on ~ why we were saturating tile voters so much." he said. Taere was a stgnillcaat dropoff rate in votlag on some issues. and many proptuitions were rejected. Johnson said. "We suspect a lot of people. out of sheer protest. just went tt2rongh and voted the negative." The hefty ballots strained the electloa depsrtmeat's resmrces and increased cosIs of virtually all aspects of tile election. Jamson said. He Is seeking a "cooperative re~"S, rnent" of elections of cities. hoping It is saileyed for November 1905. State taw reqtfires mat elec- titms for couaty omcm be In evew numbered yeats. he said. One of the ressons many local jth-isdlctlonS moved elections to coincide wits slstewtde ballotlag wss to .sve money. Johnson said if they cooperate in a regional-local e~'Uoa cycle. '~ey'd get the ad- vantage of the cost savings this would brln~ about without disadvantaSe of the volume the logSlits." For elected omces up for a vote in November 1994, ~e local gov- erning bodies could extend the terms uatil the November 1995 In the last live yean, state legislation Ires permitted local ju- son in chsnge their elections. Nearly tRi percent were consoli- dated with the November 1990 election tn the county. Two yea~ ago, the Board of Supervisors S- sued a moratorium oa nddltioaai moves because they would have exceeded the count~s ability to handle the election. ITEM 16 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY~ FINANCE OFFICE CITY MANAGER \ TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager /~Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer November 23, 1993 Ordinance 93- Prima Facie Speed Limits on Certain Streets PREPARED BY: Martin C. Lauber, Traffic Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE 93- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, AMENDING SECTION 12.02.010 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS ON CERTAIN STREETS BACKGROUND: On August 23, 1993, Margarita Road was opened to traffic from Winchester Road to Murrieta Hot Springs Road. A citizen notified staff that Margarita Road north of Winchester Road had no posted speed limit. Staff conducted a Traffic and Engineering Survey for speed zoning to determine if the existing Maximum Speed Limit (55 MPH) is re8sonable. Staff found the eighty-fifth percentile speed to be 52 miles per hour. City Staff recommends posting Margarita Road from Winchester Road to the northern City limits at 50 miles per hour. FISCAL IMPACT: Install four (4) '50 Miles Per Hour" signs (4 @ $125 each) -- $500 ATTACHMENTS: Ordinance 93- -1- pwl S~,egdq>t~.93\epeedlim.ord 1123 ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, AMENDING SECTION 12.02.010 OF THE TI2VIECULA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING PRIMA FACIE SPF~EB r.lMl'l~ ON CERTAIN STREETS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEIVIF_EULA DOES I:[ER~-RY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, The City of Temecula finds and determines that from time to time it is necessary to add or modify existing prim facie speed limits within the City for certain streets, or parts of streets. SECTION 1. Section 12.02.010(d) of the Temecuh Municipal Code is hereby amended to add the following streets: "Name of Street and Portion Affected Declared Prima Fncie Speed limit. Miles Per Hour Margaxita Road - Winchester to North City Limit SECTION 2. Severability. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any sentence, paragraph, or section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining pans of this Ordinance. SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be posted as required by hw. SECTION 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause copies of this Ordinance to be posted in three designated posting places. SECTION 5. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its passage; and within fifteen (15) days after its passage, together with the names of the City Councilmembers voting thereon, it shall be published in a newspaper published and circulated in said City. -2- pw 15%agdrpt%93~epeedlim.ord 1123 PASSED APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of ,1993. J. Sal Mufioz, Mayor ATrEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS crrY OF TEMECULA ) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the forgoing Ordinance No. 93- was dully introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the day of , 1993, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and pa~sed at a regular meeting of the City Council on the day of , 1993, by the following vote: 0 CO~CILMEMBERS: NOES: 0 CO~CILlWR~ERS: ABSENT: 0 COUNCKAVlEMBERS: June S. Greek, City Clerk -3- pwl 5%agdrpfi93%speedlim.ord 1123 ITEM 17 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer November 23, 1993 Construction of North General Kearny Road between Calle Madero and Nicolas Road RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council review the alternatives proposed for the completion of North General Kearny Road between Calls Madero and Nicolas Road, and provide direction to staff. BACKGROUND: During the discussions of the circulation element of the General Plan, a concern was raised regarding the ultimate width of the proposed street improvements required for North General I<.earny Road as a condition of the recordation of Tract 23583. Tract 23583 was conditioned to construct North General Kearny Road to a 64 foot roadway with curb and gutter within a 88 foot right-of-way from the existing improvements west of Nicolas Road to Calls Madero. The existing improvements east of Nicolas Road and adjacent to Tracts 22786 and 23583 consist of a 64 foot roadway with curb and gutter and sidewalk, within an 88 foot right-of- way. If the bonded improvements for Tract 23583 are constructed as required by the recordation of the Tract Map, a four (4) lane secondary roadway will exist between Nicolas Road and Calle Madero. Additionally the right-of-way along the northerly side of North General Kearny adjacent to Tract 23583 was increased to 110 feet to allow for slopes. As a result of the discussion at the November 9, 1993 Council meeting, staff is re-submitting the following three (3) alternatives that were reviewed at the Council meeting of August 17, 1993 for reconsideration. Terminating North General Kearny Road at proposed Corte Coelho, and constructing a cul-de-sac just southerly of Deer Meadow Road. ® Terminating North General Kearny Road at extended Calle Olvera, and constructing a cul-de-sac just southerly of Deer Meadow Road. pw 15%egdrpt%g3%1123~genkeerny.egn 1123 Reducing the proposed 64 foot wide paved roadway to 40 foot wide paved roadway within a 66 foot right-of-way from Calle Madera northerly with a transition to the presently constructed 64 foot wide portion southerly of Deer Meadow Road. Staff contacted the various departments, utilities, and agencies most likely to be affected by the proposed changes in both the roadway classification and physical width and accessibility elements. A summary of the responses from these parties can be seen in Exhibit "A". The consensus of the respondents is that a through street best serves their short and long term purposes. Any vacation of the street right-of-way will necessitate provision of, at the minimum, public utility easement reservations and the construction and maintenance of an access roadway for said utilities. The relocation of projected future traffic volumes to other local streets will likely occur in varying degrees with each of the alternatives with the least significant impact occurring under Alternative No. 3. Vacation of portions of North General Kearny will be required under all of the proposed alternative alignments. Staff will evaluate the several options arising from the City Council's direction and/or selection of the preferred alignment. Any excess land areas would revert to underlying fee owners or fronting lot ownerships. Each alternative would also require revisions to existing approved improvement and grading plans and improvement bonds and agreements. These revisions would be performed by the developer at their cost. However, this would be more than offset by anticipated reductions in construction costs. Staff is requesting Council direction on which alternative the City should pursue. Based on that direction, staff will bring back a Resolution of Intent to Vacate for Planning Commission recommendation and City Council action. FISCAL IMPACT: NONE ATTACHMENTS: 1. Exhibit "A", Resource Agency Responses 2. Alternate No. 1 3. Alternate No. 2 4. Alternate No. 3 pwl 5~agdrpt~93~l 123~,genkeerny.agn 1123 EXHIBIT "A" Resource Agency Responses The Gas Comoanv: Alternatives One and Two do not meet their long-range program or existing investment in pipe and supply provisions which were based on the SWAP (Southwest Area Plan). Alternative Three meets their needs. They would, however, consider a graded roadway and easement through any vacated or amended road alignment. Eastern Municioal Water District: The District favors Alternative Three but would consider an easement along any vacated road. This is the District's proposed access into Meadowview for future sewer service. Riverside County Fire Deoartment: The Fire Department indicates that they consider this road their future "Initial attack" access into the Meadowview area from the proposed fire station. The connection made under alternate no. 3 represents an important reduction in response time as compared to other access points. This fire station is anticipated to be in service within the next year. Rancho California Water District: The District indicates that there is an existing 12-inch water main along this street alignment with a 16-inch water main planned for the later nineties. Alternate Three is preferred with Alternative Two acceptable, subject to conditions. Their systems are also based on the SWAP alignment and the fact that the street has already been dedicated. Southern California Edison Comoanv: The Edison Company does not have facilities within the possible street vacation but would request public utility easement reservation as provided under the Streets and Highway Code for street vacations. GTE California: GTE's major feed from the Meadowview area is contained within an existing easement which runs along the westerly edge of the NGKR right-of-way between Calle Madera and the southerly limits of Tract No.22786. GTE requires access to this easement and would seek a general easement reservation in any portion of NGKR which is vacated. Riverside County Sheriff's Deot: The Department recommends either Alternative One or Two as they address the local residents concern with traffic volumes and speed anticipated from through traffic on NGKR. Some minor re-routing of Traffic is expected with the opening of Caile Olvera which is currently a dead-end street. Closure of NGKR avoids the problems which occurred on Calle Pina Colada, Calle Medusa, and Avenida De La Reina. City Plannine Deoartment: The Department favors Alternative Three as providing the best neighborhood and area-wide circulation. This plan also eliminates the alternatives of a very long cul-de-sac (Corte Coelho) and the creation of a potential loitering area by dead-ending NGKR as proposed under Alternatives One and Two. ITEM NO. 18 APPRO~ CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Council/City Manager Gary Thornhill, Director of Plannin~ November 23, 1993 Status Report on the Detailed Implementation Strategy and Regional Air Quality Programs PREPARED BY.' David W. Hogan, Associate Planner RECOMMENDATION: Review the attached material and Direct staff to prepare specific implementation programs for the Council's consideration. BACKGROUND: The purpose of this Agenda Report is to provide the Council with information regarding the effectiveness of the Transportation Control Mechanisms (TCMs) identified in the August 24th Agenda Report, inform the Council about the effectiveness of the various TCM's, and to get the Council's guidance and direction on which transportation control mechanisms the City should implement. DISCUSSION: SubreQional ADoroach On August 24, 1993, the Council was presented with information concerning the transportation control mechanisms (TCMs) identified by the Air Quality Management District and the member agencies of the Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG). Since the August meeting, the WRCOG Board has finalized the subregional approach to the implementation of the various TCM's. This information has been added to Attachment 1. The strategy calls for six core strategies which will be implemented throughout Western Riverside County and additional measures which will be implemented by all the governments in the Area Planning District. In addition, the cities and the County can implement any additional measures desired by the local government. Riverside County and the Cities of Temecula, Murrieta, Canyon Lake and Lake Elsinore are in the Southwestern Planning District. AIRQ~AIRQUAL3.CC The Western Riverside County Core Transportation Control Measures are: 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Economic Development (Jobs:Housing Balance); Alternative Mode Support Facilities; Public Information and Promotion; Increasing Alternative Transportation Modes; TDM Design Guidelines; and, Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements· The Southwestern Planning District Transportation Control Measures are: 2. 3. 4. 5. Shuttle Services; Telecommuting; Teleconferencing Facilities; Mixed Use/Land Use Design to Encourage Biking and Walking; and, Onsite Child Care· Effectiveness of the TCM's In response to a request from the City Council for quantification of the proposed TCM's, staff has attempted to quantify both the short and long term effectiveness of each measure identified in the Subregional Approach· The effectiveness of each TCM is discussed in terms of its' short-term and long-term effectiveness at reducing the number of vehicle trips· The short-term effectiveness is measured in terms of a percent of the total number of trips which the City would be responsible for reducing in 1994 if the City had a specific trip reduction target. The long-term effectiveness consists of the relative effectiveness of the measure (per the AQMD) and an estimate as to how effective the measure would be at reducing trips in the years 2000 and 2010. As indicated in Attachment 2, some of the transportation control measures are more effective at providing short-term trip reductions while others will be more effective at reducing trips in the future. Backstoo Rule If a local government fails to participate in the regional trip reduction program or fails to meet its' trip reduction targets, then the Air Quality Management District will invoke a special rule to achieve additional trip reductions. The District released a draft of the proposed Backstop Rule (Rule 1504) for public review and comment on October 20, 1993. The District wants comments by November 29, 1993· The draft Rule proposes to establish a process by which a local government or subregion would be allowed to implement any or all of the transportation control measures to achieve their local trip reduction target. The District would then evaluate the local program to determine it effectiveness and categorize the local government accordingly. If the local or subregional program does not reduce enough vehicle trip to meet its' target, then additional trip reduction activities would be required from local businesses· If an area chooses to not implement the program, it is automatically classified as a Category III City. The District's local government classification program and Backstop Rule is shown below. AIRQ~AIRQUAL3,CC 2,., AQMD PERCENT OF LOCAL CATEGORY TARGET ACHIEVED Greater than 90% II 75 to 89% III Less than 75% ADDITIONAL MEASURES REQUIRED OF LOCAL BUSINESSES BY THE DISTRICT No additional trip reduction measures or activities are required. Business with between 50 and 99 employees will be required to submit and implement trip reduction plans. Business with between 50 and 99 employees will be required to submit and implement trip reduction 'programs and implement a program where employees would have to pay to park their vehicles while at work. FUTURE ACTIVITIES: In the next few months, staff will begin preparing a number of implementation programs and ordinances to implement these transportation control measures and the Air Quality Element of the General Plan. Where appropriate, some these items will eventually be incorporated into the City's Development Code. FISCAL IMPACTS: The costs of implementing these programs are unknown at this time. ATTACHMENTS: 1. August 24, 1993 Agenda Report - Page 4 2. Summary of Trip Reduction Methods by Area Planning District and Local Government - Page 5 AIRQ~IRQUAL3,CC 3 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 AUGUST 24, 1993 AGENDA REPORT AIRQ~IRQUAL3.CC APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning August 24, 1993 Status Report on the Detailed Implementation Strategy and Regional Air Quality Programs PREPARED BY: David W. Hogan, Associate Planner RECOMMENDATION: Review the attached material and direct Staff to prepare specific implementation programs for the Council's consideration PURPOSE: The purposes of this Agenda Report are to inform the Council about the status of regional air quality programs, to discuss the City's role in the process, and to get the Council's guidance and direction on which trip reduction methods the City should use. BACKGROUND: The South Coast Air Basin has some of the worst air quality in the countr~ and has been designated a nonattainment area for Ozone, Nitrous Oxides, Carbon Monoxide and Particulate Matter. Because of the poor regional air quality, the South Coast Air Quality Management District (District) has been required by both the Federal and State Clean Air Acts to prepare an biennial air quality management plans since the 1970's. The next Air Quality Management Plan is currently being prepared by the District. The current Air Quality Management Plan (Plan) resulted in trip reduction targets and also contained a number of control measures which local governments were expected to implement. In response to this requirement, WRCOG developed a subregional or areawide approach to air quality implementation. This approach was endorsed by the District and eventually approved by the City Council on November 24, 1992. DISCUSSION: Subreqional Approach At this time the City is in the process of participating with WRCOG and its' member agencies in the implementation of the Subregional Air Quality Program. The City Council approved a resolutionsupporting WRCOG's Subregional Air Quality Program on November 24, 1992. The program identified a number of activities which the City would support and pacticipate in. The table below summarizes the status of the City's implementation efforts. AIRQ~AIRQUAI,2. CC STATUS OF SUBREGIONAL APPROACH IMPLEMENTATION IMPLEMENTATION ACTIONS Adopt a resolution supporting WRCOG's Subregional Approach. Adopt a Transportation Demand Management Ordinance to meet the requirements of the Congestion Management Program and the Air Quality Management Plan. Promote voluntary programs to meet the goals of the air quality and congestion management programs. Agree to participate in the development of future area and subregional air quality action plans (Detailed Implementation Strategies) to meet trip reduction targets. Develop trip reduction programs for City employees. Agree to provide information to WRCOG to document local implementation measures. STATUS Completed; the City Council approved a Resolution on November 24, 1992. Completed; the City Council adopted an Ordinance on January 28, 1993. The City is currently exceeding this requirement by including an Air Quality Element in the General Plan. This activity is ongoing and is a primary focus of this Agenda Report. City Staff is currently reviewing how other firms and agencies operate their own trip reduction programs. City Staff is cooperating with WRCOG to document our air quality activities. The schedule prepared by the District envisions that cities will notify them about the measures they intend to adopt by June 30, 1993 and adopt the strategies, programs, measures, and ordinances by the end of 1993. Trio Reduction Tarqets One of the requirements of the Plan is to begin to reduce the number and length of vehicle trips within the region by 2010. This has resulted in trip reduction targets for 1994, 1997, 2000, and 2010. The four countywide trip reduction targets which resulted were based upon a combination of the number of jobs and the number of housing units. The District then encouraged the subregional agencies such as WRCOG to further breakdown the targets and assign specific trip reduction targets to individual cities. However, the cities in Western Riverside County decided not to assign trip reduction targets to individual cities and to work as a region to reduce the trips that could be reduced. This means that the WRCOG area will either succeed or partially succeed as a whole at meeting its' trip reduction target. The 1994 trip reduction target for the WRCOG area is 31,417 vehicle trips per day. WRCOG will provide the District with a estimate of the total number of vehicle trips being reduced by the measures the WRCOG members have agreed to implement. AIRQ~AIRQUAL2.CC 2 If a local government fails to participate in the regional trip reduction effort (or if a subregion fails to meet its' trip reduction targets) the Air Quality Management District could invoke a "backstop rule" to implement additional transportation control programs to achieve the target. The District is currently working on a draft of the Backstop Rule. It is expected that a draft of the rule will be available for public review and comment later this fall. Area Plannine Districts To implement this regional approach, WRCOG has established six Area Planning Districts (APD's) which cover the WRCOG area. Each District represents a contiguous area with similar opportunities and constraints. Temecula is in the Southwest Planning District which includes the Cities of Canyon Lake, Lake Elsinore, and Murrieta, as well as adjacent unincorporated communities of Wildomar, Sun City and Menifee. The City of Temecula is cooperating with the other Southwest APD agencies to address the Temecula Valleys' particular needs. The initial preferred trip reduction methods have been consolidated in meetings with the Staff of the Cities within the Southwest District, the County, and WRCOG. The preliminary trip reduction methods for all the Area Planning Districts are shown in Attachment No. 1. A supplemental description of potentially feasible transportation control measures and the type of vehicle trips they are most effective at reducing is included here in Attachment No 2. This list is similar to the list which was provided to the City Council at its' March 23, 1993, meeting. Many of these measures will only be effective at reducing vehicle trips in Temecula over the long term. Included in Attachment 2 is a description of the type of vehicle trips that each measure is intended to address. The types of vehicle trips have been categorized into three groups: commute, non-commute, and non-work. Commute trips, which represent 31% of all trips regionwide, are the vehicle trips between the home and the work place. Non-commute work trips, represent 8% of all trips, consist of work related trips which occur during the work day. Non-work trips, representing 61% of all vehicle trips, include a wide range of personal trips, such as going to the store, running errands, or transporting family members. Detailed Implementation Strateav The Detailed Implementation Strategies (DIS) contains the activities and measures that local governments will implement to achieve the trip reduction targets mandated by the District. The DIS and Action Plan will identify those measures to be implemented within each APD. This Detailed Implementation Strategy for the Southwest Area Planning District is included in Attachment No. 3. FUTURE ACTIVITIES: In the next six months, City Staff will begin preparing a number of implementation programs and ordinances to implement these transportation control measures and the Air Quality Element of the General Plan. Where appropriate, some these items will eventually be incorporated into the City's Development Code. FISCAL IMPACTS: The costs of implementing these programs are unknown at this time. AIRQ~AIRQUAL2.CC 3 ATTACHMENT NO. 2 SUMMARY OF TRIP REDUCTION METHODS TO MEET THE 1994 SUBREGIONAL TARGET AIRQ~AIRQUAI..3,CC 5 ATTACHMENT NO. 2 SUMMARY OF TRIP REDUCTIONS TO MEET THE 1994 SUBREGIONAL TARGETS TRIP REDUCTION METHODS AND DESCRIPTIONS INCREASING ALTERNATE TRANSPORTATION MODE OPTIONS - Provide other means of transportation in the future to encourage the use of eltemative8 to the single- occupant vehicle. [REGIONWIDE CORE TCM] SHUTTLE SERVICE - Provide shuttle or transit 8errices between the various housing, service and employment districts. [PLANNING AREA TCM] BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS - Require bicycle parking, lockers, end/or shower facilities st ell employment, commercial and transit enters, and provide a drywide bicycle route nsMork. [REGIONWIDE CORE TCM] CONDUCT EDUCATION. INFORMATION, AND PROMOTIONAL ACTIVITIES - Undertake a pubtic education campaign to increase public awareness of the problems end solutions to air quality. [REGIONWIDE CORE TCM] ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND THE CREATION OF LOCAL JOBS - Expand the local employment base to provide additional employment opportunities for local residents. [REGIONWIDE CORE TCM] RIDESHARING PLAN FOR EMPLOYERS WITH 50 TO 99 EMPLOYEES - Require Employers with between 50 end 99 employees to prepare trip reduction plans. Multi-tenant sites could also be included. PERCENT OF THE 1994 REDUCTION TARGETm WHICH MIGHT BE REDUCED o% < 1% <1% GENERAL PLAN POLICIES THAT SUPPORT THIS TCM LU: 5.1, 5.2 CIR: 1.4, 3.4, 3.5, 3.6, 3.7, 4.5. 4.9. 6.5 HOU: 1.6 OSC: 8.1, 8.3 GMPF: 1.1 AQ: 2.3, 2.4 CIR: 1.4, 3.4, 4.8 AQ: 2.3 LU: 5.1, 5.2, 5.3, 5.4 CIR: 4.6, 6.1, 6.4, 6.5 OSC: 8.1, 8.3, 8.4 OD: 1.1, 1.4 AO.: 2.3, 2.4 6% AQ: 4.2, 4,3 TCM EFFECTIVENESS AND THE LONG TERM TCM EFFECTIVENESS AQMD rJ-I-,-CTIVENESS OF THIS TCM IS UNKNOWN. LONG-TERM EFFECTIVENESS 2000: Medium-High 2010: Very High AQMD EFFECTNENESS OF THIS TCM IS UNKNOWN. LONG-TERM EFFECTIVENESS 2000: Medium 2010: Low-Medium AQMD EFFECTIVENESS OF TCM IS APPROXIMATELY 112%. LONG-TERM EFFECTIVENESS 2000: Medium-High 2010: Medium-High AQMD EFFECTIVENESS OF TCM IS APPROXIMATELY 2%. LONG-TERM EFFECTNENESS 2000: Medium-Low 2010: Low o% LU: 1.5, 8.4 AQ: 1.1 GMPF: 2.5 ECD: 1.1, 1.2, 2.1 11% CIR: 1.4, 4.10 AQMD EFFECTNENES8 IS UNKNOWN. HOWEVER IT IS EXPECTED TO ACCOUNT FOR THE MAJORITY OF THE LONG TERM TRIP REDUCTIONS. LONG-TERM EFFECTIVERESS 2000: Medium 2010: Medium-High AQMD EFFECTIVENESS OF TCM IS APPROXIMATELY 7%. LONG-TERM EFFECTIVENESS 2000: Low-Medium 2010: Low (1) The percentage of City l~ip8 reduce have been deedoped using the Air Quality ~t Dimzim' standard trip quenti~calion methodology and assuming the the City proFern would not ~ require that the TCM be immediately inq}ienelted by existing businessel in existing devdopment. (2) The fedalive effectiveness eatjrnltes h nleasufel ability to Ichieve 2000 and 2010 trip reduction tatgel and to make sigrd~csnt change in subregional transportation patterns. Higher growth rate for Ioced profesedoned/office enl}ioyment, end in arm surrounding the viigo centers could increase the effectiveness of some of thee measure. AIRQ%AIRQUAI.3.CC 6 TRIP REDUCTION METHODS AND DESCRIPTIONS NON-EMPLOYER BASED < 196 RIDESHARE MATCHING - Organize citywide rideshare programs. This could also include establishing of a Commuter Information Center to support the ridesharing activities among smaller employers. ALTERNATE MODE SUPPORT 0% FACILITIES - Provide bus turnouts, stops, shelters, reserved van pod parking, end other feelties to support the use of alternative modes of transportation. [REGIONWIDE CORE TCM] TELECOMMUTING AND WORK 7% AT HOME - Require employers with between 50 and 99 employees provide teiecommuting program for their employees. [PLANNING AREA TCM] TELECOMMUTING AND 0% TELECONFERENCING CENTERS - Require all new subdivisions to provide or contribute to talecommuting and teleconferencing facilities. [PLANNING AREA TCM] MIXED USE/LAND USE DESIGN 0% TO ENCOURAGE BIKING AND WALKING - Require new development to provide a variety of land use types and facilities to encourage the usa of alternative form of transpor- tation and discourages the use of single occupant yahides. [PLANNING AREA TCM] LAND USE INTENSIfiCATION 0% AROUND TRANSIT STATIONS - Increase future land use densities and intensities around existing transit centers. [CITY TCM] EXISTING DEVELOPMENT 0% RELATED TO NEW COMMUTER RAIL STATIONS - Increase land use density/intensity around proposed transit centers. PERCENT OF THE 1994 REDUCTION TARGETm WHICH MIGHT BE REDUCED GENERAL PLAN POLICIES THAT SUPPORT THIS TCM CIR: 1.4 LU: 5.1 CIR: 1.4, 3.4, 4.4 AQ: 2.1, 2.3, 2.4 AQ: 2.1 LU: 1.5 AQ: 2.1 LU: 1.3, 5.1, 5.2, 5.5, 5.6, 5.7, 5.11 CIR: 4.5, 4.7, 4.9, 6.5 HOU: 1.6 OSC: 8.4 AGe 1.2, 2.1 LU: 5.1, 5.5, 5.6, 5.7, 5.8, 8.4 HOU: 1.6 AGe 1.2, 2.1 TCM EFFECTIVENESS AND THE LONG TERM TCM EFFECTIVENESS AQMD EFFECTIVENESS OF TCM IS APPROXIMATELY 2%. .. LONG-TERM EFFECTIVENESS 2000: Low 2010: Low AQMD EFFECTIVENESS OF TCM IS APPROXIMATELY 1%. LONG-TERM EFFECTIVENESS 2000: Medium 201 O: Low AQMD EFFECTIVENESS OF TCM IS APPROXIMATELY 2%. LONG-TERM EFFECTNENESS 2000: Low-Medium 2010: Low-Medium AOMD ~r~CTNENES8 OF THIS TCM IS UNKNOWN. LONG-TERM EFFECTIVENESS 2000: Low-Medium 2010: Low-Medium AQMD EFFECTIVENESS OF TCM IS APPROXIMATELY 5 TO 10%. LONG-TERM EFFECTNENESS 2000: Low-Medium 2010: High AQMD EFFECTIVENESS OF TCM IS APPROXIMATELY 6%. LONG-TERM EFFECTIVENESS 2000: Low 2010: Medium-High AQMD EFFECTIVENESS OF TCM IS APPROXIMATELY 0%. LONG-TERM EFFECTIVENESS 2000: Nil 2010: Nil (1) The percentage of City tripe reduced haas been daadoped using the Air Quality Management Districts' standard trip quentification methodology semxninO that the City Ixogram would not normally require that the TCM be immediately imlakmented by existing businesses in existing devdopment. (2) The rsistive effectivenee etirnltse the measures ability to achieve 2000 end 2010 thp reduction targets end to make significant change in subregional trenspoftstion petteens. Higher growth rates fix local professional/office employment, end in ere, surrounding the viiiego ce,qter8 could increase the effectiveness of some of these measures. AIRQ~AIRQUAI,3,CC 7 TRIP REDUCTION METHODS AND DESCRIPTIONS ON-SITE CHILD CARE 0% FACILITIES - Require that large employment canters provide for and support on-site child care facilities. [PLANNING AREA TCM] REDUCED PARING SPACE 0% REQUIREMENTS - Reduce the number of perking span required, establish a maximum number of perking span for non-residential development, or require that extra parking spaces be committed to Park-N- Ride or public transit uses. [PLANNING AREA TCM] USE OF ALTERNATIVELY 0% FUELED VEHICLES, - Design for and actively encourage the use of alternative fueled vehicles. This could include use electric vehicle charging stations or the use of golf carts in large planned developments. [CITY TCM] TRANSIT DEMAND MANAGEMENT (TDM) DESIGN GUIDELINES - Adopt an ordinance to address street standards, peNtdan and bikeways, mixed use development to encourage the use of sltemstive transportstion. [REGIONWIDE CORE TCM] ENHANCE ENFORCEMENT OF 0% POLLUTING VEHICLES - Greater emphasis on the enforcement of laws against 'smoking vehicles ". [CITY TCM] PERCENT OF THE 1994 GENERAL PLAN TCM EFFECTIVENESS AND REDUCTION TARGETm POLICIES THAT THE LONG TERM TCM WHICH MIGHT BE REDUCED SUPPORT THIS TCM EFFECTIVENESS LU: 5.1 AGMD ~I-i~CTNENESS OF TCM AQ: 2.1 IS APPROXIMATELY li%. (Incorporated into other measures) ClR: 1.4, 3.5 LU: 5.1 CIR: 4.5 AQ: 2.6 (incorporated into other measures) AQ: 2.5 LONG-TERM EFFECTIVENESS 2000: Low-Medium 2010: Low-Medium AQMD ~.~.CTNENESS OF THIS TCM IS UNKNOWN. LONG-TERM EFFECTIVENESS 2000: Low-Medium 2010: Low THIS TCM WOULD REDUCE AIR POLLUTION WHILE NOT REDUCE VEHICLE TRIPS. LONG-TERM EFFECTNENESS 2000: Low-Medium 2010: Medium LONG-TERM i':H-e-CTIVENESS 2000: NoT applicable 2010: Not applicable Not included in AQMD TCM Ordinance Handbook. LONG-TERM EFFECtiVENESS 2000: Nil 2010: Nil (1) The pecantags of City trips reduce have been developed using the Air Quality IVbnegement Districts' standard trip cluantfficstion methodology and assuming tint the City lxogram would not noNally require ~hot the TCM be invnediatdy imidemented by existing businesses in existing devdopment. (2) The rdstive effectiverten estimate tie measure ability to achieve 2000 and 2010 trip redu=tio. targets end to make mgni~cent changes in subregional transportation patterns. Higher gro~vth rate for Iocat Ixofesionadloffice eml:doynant, and in areas surrounding the village cantata could increase the effectiveness of some of tiers measure, AIRQ%AIRQUAL3.CC 8 ITEM NO. 19 DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT APPROVAL: CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER ~_ TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Council/City Manager Anthony Elmo, Chief Building Official November 23, 1993 Building and Safety October, 1993, Activity Report RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. DISCUSSION: The following is a summary of activity for October, 1993: Building Permits Issued ............................................ 176 Building Valuation ........................................ $11,194,842 Revenue Collected ......................................... $97,926.24 Housing Starts ................................................... 75 New Commercial Starts ................................ 3 =75,098 Sq. Ft. Commercial Additions/Alterations ......................... 6 = 13,649 Sq. Ft. Building Inspections ............................................ 2,530 Agenda Report V:%WP%AGENDA.REI~Sept'93.Rpt November 23, 1993 Page 2 Code Enforcement Actions ......................................... 267 Active Cases Pending ............................................. 142 Closed Cases .................................................... 61 V:%WP~AGENDA.REP~SeleT'93.Rlat APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER /~, TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council ~ Gary Thornhill, Director of Planni November 23, 1993 Monthly Report RECOMMENDATION: Receive and File Discussion: The following is a summary of the Planning Department's caseload and project activity for the month of October 1993: Caseload Activity: The department received 7 applications for administrative cases and 4 public hearing cases for the month of October. The following is a breakdown of case type for public hearing items: Change of Zone Minor Public Use Permit Minor Public Use Permit Public Use Permit Ongoing Projects: * General Plan: Council approved on November 9, 1993 Old Town Soecific Plan: Staff continues working with the Old Town Merchants Association and the Temecula Town Association to set up a Main Street organization for Old Town. The Plan will be scheduled for City Council review in January 1994. Develooment Code: A draft code is being reviewed by the Development Code Advisory Committee. The committee has met three times and met again on October 28th. R:~S~MONTHLY.RFT~1993~,OCT.93 11 116/93 vgw 1 French Valley Airoort: A preliminary draft of a portion of the Airport Facility Master Plan for French Valley Airport has been sent to the City for review. Temecula Reaional Center Specific Plan and Environmental Impact Report: This Specific Plan was presented at a Planning Commission Workshop on May 4, 1992. The Commissioners gave direction to the applicant and staff. This Specific Plan went to a DRC meeting January 5, 1993. Staff is awaiting submittal of additional information. Environmental Impact Report 340 prepared for the Temecula Regional Center was approved by the Planning Commission on June 21, 1993 and certified by the City Council on July 13, 1993. Winchester Hills and CamDos Verdes Soecific Plans and Environmental Impact Reoorts: These Specific Plans were discussed at a Planning Commission Workshop on May 4, 1992. The Commissioners gave direction to the applicant and staff. The Notice of Completion for the Campos Verdes EIR went to State Clearinghouse July 10, 1992. Both of these Specific Plans went to the DRC meetings on January 5, 1993. Staff is awaiting submittal of additional information. Murdv Ranch Soecific Plan and Environmental Imoact Reoort: This Specific Plan was presented to the Planning Commission at a Workshop on April 6, 1992. The Commission provided Staff and the applicant direction relative to design issues. The applicant has incorporated these changes into the Specific Plan. This Specific Plan will be scheduled for a Planning Commission meeting upon completion of the Development Agreement and the Congestion Management Plan. Johnson Ranch Soecific Plan: The Specific Plan has been submitted and is currently being reviewed by staff. Attachment: 1. Count & Valuation Summary by Type - page 3 2. Revenue and Status Report - page 4 R:\S\MONTHLY.RPT~1993%OCT.93 11 116/83 vgw 2 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 COUNT AND VALUATION SUMMARY BY TYPE JULY 1993 R:%S~,MONTHLY.RPT~1993~OCT.93 11116/93 vgw 3 REPT155 11/16/93 12:11 COUNT & VALUATION SUMMARY BY TYPE Subtotal: Cnstr Type Date Range 1 10/01/93 Thru 10/31/93 OCTOBER 1993 Date Type: 1 T~s (Select):PLAN A/P~u Type Construction type Count Sq Feet A PLANNING CASE-6/9/93 CERT OF LAND DIV COMPLY CHANGE OF ZONE EXT OF TIME/PLOT PLANS MINOR CONDITIONAL USE,PM MINOR EVENT - NON PROFIT MINOR PUBLIC USE PERMIT PLOT PLAN ADMINISTRATIVE PUBLIC USE PERMIT SUBSTAN CONFORM-GENERAL i 0 -1 0 1 0 I 0 3 0 i 0 1 0 1 0 i 0 11 0 TOTAL ** 11 0 ATTACHMENT NO. 2 REVENUE STATUS REPORT R:~,S~MONTHLY.RPT~1993~0CT.93 11 I16/93 vgw 4 REVPRiN2 11/16/93 ACCOUNT # 4147 4148 4149 4150 4151 4152 4153 4154 4155 4156 4157 4169 4170 4180 4200 4206 4226 4260 4261 4262 4369 437~ 12:34:40 GENERAL FUND PLANNING DESCRIPTION VACATIONS PLAN tIC DOCUNENT PROCESSING CONDEMNATION PLAN CHECK REVERSION TO ACRE, PLAN CHECK PARCEL NAP PLAN CHECK TRACT NAP PLAN CHECK AMENDED NAP PLAN CHECK 4TH & StieS, $UBN[TTALS FENA STUDY REVIE~ LONA REVIEV DRAINAGE STUDY REV]EU IHPROVE INSPECT]ON ON-SITE K-RAT STUDY FEES FAST TRACK PLANNING FONNA FAST TRACK IN HOUSE PLAN CHECKS ANNEXAT[ON FEES TENPORARY USE PERNIT ACCESSONY WIND ENERGY LARGE FAMILY DAY CARE HAZARDOUS HASTE FACILITY LAND DIV UNIT NAP LANDSCAPE PLAN CHECK REVENUE TO DATE GENERAL FUND CITY OF TEMECULA REVENUE STATUS REPORT OCTOBER 1993 ADJUSTED ESTIMATE .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 150,000.00 150,000.00 OCTOBER REVENUE .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 350.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 1,705.00 8,932.00 8,932.00 1993-9~ REVENUE .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 1,420.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 187.00 5,865.00 63,271.00 63,271.00 PAGE BALANCE .00 .00 .00 .00 '.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 1,420.00- .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 187.00- 5,865.00- 86,729.00 86,TZ9.00 X COL m 42.2 42.2 REVPRIN2 11/16/~3 001 161 ACCOUNT # 4101 4102 4103 4104 4105 4106 4107 4108 4109 4110 4111 4112 4113 4114 4115 4116 4117 4118 4119 4120 4121 4122 4123 4125 4126 4127 4128 4129 4130 4131 4132 4133 4134 4135 4136 4137 4138 4139 4140 4141 4142 4143 4144 4145 4146 12:34:40 GENERAL FUND PLANNING DESCRIPTION AMENDED F]NAL NAP APPEALS CERT. OF LAND DIV. COMPLIANCE EXTENSION OF TIME SINGLE FAMILY TRACTS MULTI'FAMILY TRACTS PARCEL NAPS LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT MINOR CHANGE PARCEL MERGER (2"4 LOTS) RECORDABLE SUBDIVISION NAPS REVERSION TO ACREAGE (5+LOTS) SPECIAL SERVICE LETTER SECOND UNIT PERMITS CHANGE OF ZONE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CONSISTENCY CHECKS GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT PLOT PLAN PUBLIC USE PERMIT REVISED PERMIT SETBACK ADJUSTMENT SPECIFIC PLAN SUBSTANTIAL CONFORNANCE TEMORARY OUTDOOR EVENT TEMPORARY USE PERMIT VARIANCE ZONING INFORMATION LETTER CEQA (]NITIAL STUI)IES) CEQA ENVIRONENT IMPACT REPORT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT GEOLOGY CEGA GEOLOGY ORD. 547 APZ LAFCO PARCEL NAP/WAIVER MERGER AMENDED FINAL TRACT/PAR, NAP CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION CONDO TRACT NAP REVERSION TO ACREAGE LOT REVISION AFTER CHECK LOT LINE ADJUST, PLAN CHECK CERT. OF CORRECT, PLAN CHECK CERT. OF COMPLIANCE PLAN CHECK CORD. CERT. OF CONPL. PLN. CK. CERT. OF PAR. MERGER PLAN CK CITY OF TEMECULA REVENUE STATUS REPORT OCTOBER 1~3 ADJUSTED ESTIMATE .00 .00 ,00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ,00 ,00 .00 ,00 ,00 .00 .00 ,00 ,00 150,000.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ,00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 OCTOBER REVENUE .00 .00 356.00 352.00 .00 .00 120.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 1,180.00 .00 .00 204.00- 3,707.00 .00 .00 .00 713.00 45.00 .00 .00 .00 608.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 1993-94 REVENUE .00 650.00 756.00 2,577.00 18,466.00 .00 1,325.00 1,810.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 260.00 2,746.00 9,985,00 .00 ,00 1,465.00 3,707.00 275.00 500.00 .00 1,981.00 3.00- .00 571.00 18.00 4,512.00 4,200.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 BALANCE .00 650.00- 756.00- 2.577.00- 18,466.00- .00 1.325.00- 1,810.00- .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 260.00- 2.746.00- 9,985.00- .00 .00 148,535.00 3,707.00- 273.00- 500.00- .00 1,981.00- 3.00 .00 571.00- 18.00- 4,512.00- 4,200.00- .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 PAGE I COL 1.0 REVPRIN2 11/16/93 12:34:40 GRAND TOTALS DESCRIPTION CiTY OF TENECULA REVENUE STATUS REPORT OCTOBER 1993 PAGE 3 ADJUSTED OCTOBER 1'99'3-94 BALANCE X COL ESTIIqATE REVENUE REVENUE REVENUE TO DATE 150,000,00 8,932.00 63,271.00 86,729.00 42.2 GRAND TOTALS 150,000.00 8,932.00 63,271.00 86,729.00 42.2 REVPRZN2 11/16/~ 12:34:40 CITY OF TEHECULA REVENUE RECAP REPORT OCTOBER lg93 PAGE 001-161 DESCRIPTION PLANNING GRAND TOTALS ADJUSTED ESTINATE 150,000.00 150,000.00 OCTOBER REVENUE 8,932.00 8,932.00 1993-~ REVENUE 63,271.00 63,271.00 BALANCE 86,729.00 86,729.00 COL 42.2 ~,2.2 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER ~_ TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City CoUncil/City Manager ,,~ Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer November 23, 1993 Public Works Monthly Activity Report RECOMMENDATION: Attached for City Council's review and filing is the Department of Public Works' Monthly Activity Reports for October, 1993. pwl 5~agdrpt\93~1123~tnoectrpt TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: MEMORANDUM Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Brad Buron, Maintenance Superintendent November 1, 1993 Monthly Activity Report - October 1993 The following activities were performed by Public Works Department, Street Maintenance Division in-house personnel for the month of October, 1993: II. III. IV. SIGNS A. Total signs replaced B. Total signs installed C. Total signs repaired TREES A. Total trees trimmed for sight distance and street sweeping concerns POTHOLES A. Total square feet of potholes repaired CATCH BASINS A. Total catch basins cleaned RIGHT-OF-WAY WEED ABATEMENT A. Total square footage for right-of-way abatement GRAFFITI REMOVAL A. Total locations A. Total S.F. VI. 10 8 8 44 271 1,174 15 4,124 Also, City Maintenance staff responded to 27 service order requests ranging from weed abatement, tree trimming, sign repair, A.C. failures, litter removal, and catch basin cleanings. This is compared to 16 service order requests for the month of September, 1993. The Maintenance Crew has also put in 82 hours of overtime which includes standby time, P.M. surveillance (weekends only), and response to street emergencies. -1- pwOS\roeds~actrpt~93%10 1108 MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT - October, 1993 "" \ Page 2 ORANGE COUNTY STRIPING AND STENCILING COMPANY has completed the followinq: · 0 L.F. of new and repainted striping · 0 L.F. of sand blasting · 0 L.F. of red curb · 0 new and repainted legends The total cost for Orange County striping service was $0.00 compared to $14,232.44 for September, 1993. Arbor Pro Tree Service has completed the following: 305 trees trimmed in City right-of-way for sight distance, trash collection and street sweepers access, total cost $6,100.00. The total cost for Street Maintenance performed by Contractors for the month of October, 1993 was $105,971.98 compared to 857,420.72 for the month of September, 1993. Account No. 5402 Account No. 5401 $71,655.98 $34,316.00 In addition, on Wednesday, October 13, 1993, the new procedures for informal bidding for Public Works Street Maintenance work orders of $25,000.00 or less for FY 93-94 went into effect and all remarks and "feed-back" from in-house Staff and/or Contractors have been all positive at this time. Also, City crews have checked, cleaned and secured approximately 75% of catch basins Citywide. CC: Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects Raymond A. Casey, Principal Engineer - Land Development Martin C. Lauber, Traffic Engineer -2- pwO5~roeds~actrpt~93~10 1108 0 (9 o. MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT - October, 1993 Page 3 STREET MAINTENANCE CONTRACTORS The following contractors have performed the following project for the month of July. NELSON PAVING Account No. 540~ Date: October 4, 1993 Rancho California Road ~ Calle Aragon Removed asphalt paving form area approximately 221 sq. ft in order to do exploratory dig for street depression. Disposed of legally. Removed soft sub grade and replaced with base material. Recompacted sub grade and asphalt patched back removed section then asphalt capped area. Total A.C. 4 Tons Total S.F. 221 Account No. 540~ Date: October 5, 1993 Deportola @ Jedediah Smith Overlay around catch basin Total A.C. I Ton Total S.F. 60 TOTAL COST: $2,122.0Q.,~ TOTAL COST: $475.00 Account No. 540~ Date: October 4, 1993 Kaiser Parkway @ Rancho California Road Removed asphalt paving from area approximately 495 sq. ft. in order to do exploratory dig for street depression. Removed soft sub grade and replaced with base material. Recompacted sub grade and asphalt patched back removed section then asphalt capped area. Total A.C. 9 Tons Total S.F. 495 TOTAL COST: $3,729.~ -3- pwO5%roede%e~trpt~93%10 1108 MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT - October, 1993 Page 4 Account No. 540~ Date: October 7, 1993 Rancho Vista between Via El Grecgo and Camino Romo Shoulder grading for erosion control 3000' .x 6'. Fill 3 areas of erosion 500' x 3' x 2'. Cut 375' shoulder area for ,E.O.P. clearance. TOTAL COST: 93,389.00 Account No. 5409 Date: October 11, 1993 Villa De Sur Drive ~) Deportola Road Removed and replaced various areas along street in approximately 420 sq. ft. Asphalt Overlayed areas approximately 5700 sq. ft. Removed and replaced approximately 200 In. ft. of asphalt curbline. * *EXTRA: Asphalt overlay another area in roadway approx. 1,088 sq. ft. Total A.C. 130 Tons Total S.F. 7,408 TOTAL COST: 99,975.00 Account No. 540~ Date: October 11, 1993 Calle Torcida 300' s/o Via Norte Removed sections if asphalt paving from roadway and disposed of legally. Replaced with new asphalt material. Approx. area removed and replaced 750 sq. ft. Removed and replaced asphalt curbline in area approx. 250 In. ft. Total A.C. 20 Tons Total S.F. 1,000 TOTAL COST: 94,125.00 -4- pwO5%roads%eetrpt~.93~10 1108 MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT - October, 1993 Page 5 Account No. 540~ Date: October 14, 1993 Manzano Drive n/o Pescado Road Remove end dispose of 151 In. ft. of asphalt curbline. Replace with new asphalt curb. Remove and dispose of 240 sq. ft. of failing asphalt roadway/flowline. Replace with new asphalt material to patch back to curb. Remove algae from flowline with high pressure washer and asphalt overlay flowline in area 1,850 sol. ft. Remove asphalt and dispose of from drain inlet and replace with new asphalt material in area approx. 37 sq. ft. Rebase eroded area of asphalt paving along roadway approx. 50 sq. ft. Total A.C. 22 Tons Total S.F. 2,328 TOTAL COST: $ 5,617.00 Account No. 5409 Date: October 7, 1993 Remove and replace approx. 931 sq. ft of concrete sidewalk area and dispose of legally. Remove and replace 12 In. ft. W/2' gutter and 11' 9" curb W/3' 6" gutter. **EXTRA: Remove and replace 300 scl. ft. of sidewalk area on Via Aguila. Remove and replace area on Via Puerta. Remove and replace 21 In. ft. 2' and 3' curb and gutter. Total P.C.C. 15 yards Total S.F. 1,394 TOTAL COST: $12,790.00 Account No. 5401 Date: October 11, 1993 Avenida Centenario & Villa Del Sur 25 tons 1" rock and asphalt patch street section in area approx. 200 sq. ft. Avenida Centenario - Furnish and place 98 In. ft. of 6" berm for curbline. *eEXTRA: Remove and replace 225 sq. ft. of asphalt paving from roadway at De Portola Road and Villa Del Sur Drive. Work order No. 93-94-32. Total A.C. 9 Tons Total S.F. 523 TOTAL COST: $3,245.00-., -5- pwO5%roade%e~trpt~93%10 1108 MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT - October, 1993 Page 6 Account No. 540.~ Date: October 12, 1993 Grade and compact native soil in order to place concrete headwall. Set foundation forms for placement of concrete material. Furnish and place concrete material in area approx. 50' x 3' x 3' for headwall in Via Lobo Channel. Fine grade V ditch as per Brad Buron at Calle Medusa, cross street Nicolas. Total P.C.C. 10 Yards Total S.F. 150 TOTAL COST: $3,030.00 Account No. 540.~ Date: October 20, 1993 Deer Meadow ~ Holden Circle Remove and replace driveway approach. Total P.C.C. 6 Yards Total S.F. 115 TOTAL COST: $975.00 Account No. 5402 Date: October 25, 1993 Remove and replace 282 In. ft. of 6" asphalt berm on Via Lobo North and South of Deer-meadow. Total A.C. 24 Tons Total L.F. 282 TOTAL COST: $990.00 Account No. 5401 Date: October 25, 1993 Excavate and compact native soil as needed in order to place base material in area 11,460 sq. ft. Place ground sterilizer prior to placement of base material. Furnish and place 6" of class No. 2 base material in area 11,460 scl. ft. and compact. Furnish and place 4' A/R 8000 asphalt material in area approx. 11,460 sq. ft. Remove and replace 325 sq. ft. of concrete sidewalks. Total A.C. 678 Tons Total P.C.C. 10 Yards TOTAL COST: $19,930.00 -6- pwOS%roads%ect~t%93%10 1108 MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT - October, 1993 Page 7 MONTt:LF:ONI: I:XCAVATING Account No. 540~ Date: October 13, 1993 Margarita Road s/o North General Kearney (Preventative Maintenance) Install 408' L.F. of 6" A.C. Berm. Install 3,266 S.F. of A.C. swales. Install 20 ton rip- rap. **EXTRA: Install V-ditch. Four hours labor for 2 men, one hour backhoe, 2 yards concrete on V-ditch (5 SAC J). Total A.C. 63 Tons Total S.F. 3,674 TOTAL COST: $9,292.00 Account No. 5402 Date: October 18, 1993 ~"' First Street w/o Front Street - Street Failure 2 10 x 10 patches R & R * *EXTRA: Remove and replace asphalt 12' x 3" x 4", 5 hours of labor x 2 men, 5 hours backhoe, 10 yards 2 sack sand slurry, 2 hours wacker compactor. Total A.C. 4.5 Tons Total S.F. 236 TOTAL COST: $2,610.48 Account No. 5401 Date: October 20, 1993 Ynez at Vellejo Construct 3' x 5' concrete box culvert for drainage. Total P.C.C. 35 Yards TOTAL COST: $12,450.00 -7- pwOS%roede%ectrpt%93%10 1108 MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT - October, 1993 Page 8 HOUSTON HARRIS Account No. 5401 Date: October 11, 1993 Riseling Hill Drive 12 hours cleaning 36" RCP, 3 hours video system DEL RIO CONTRACTORS Account No. 5401 Date: October 12, 1993 Margarita Road from Rancho California Road to Avertida Barca Remove and replace failed sidewalk Total P.C.C. 4 Yards Total S.F. 114 TOTAL COST: $1,936.00 TOTAL COST: $2,000.00 C & C GRADING AND PAVING Account No. 5402 Date: October 26, 1993 Calle Fiesta at Via Notre Remove and replace 2,430 of A.C., Overlayed 2,430 of A.C. Total A.C. 60 Tons Total S.F. 4,860 TOTAL COST: $ 5,781.50 -8- pwO5%roede%ectrpt~93%lO 1108 MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT - October, 1993 Page 9 CUNNINGHAM DAVIS CORPORATION Account No. 540~ Date: October 5, 1993 41135 Via Puerta & 41270 Via Aguila Remove and replace plus root prune sidewalks Total P.C.C. 2.5 Yards Total S.F. 168 TOTAL COST: $1,500.00 -9- pwOS~roede%ect~t%93%10 1108 ~DATE 10-04-93 10-05-93 10-05-93 10-05-93 10-06-93 10-08-93 10-11-93 10-11-93 1;:.. 'i-93 10-13-93 10-14-93 10-18-93 10-18-93 10-18-93 10-19-93 10-19-93 10-21-93 10-22-93 10-22-93 10-22-93 10-26-93 10-26-93 , 10~2,8-93 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION WORK COMPLETED OCTOBER 1993 SERVICE ORDER REQUEST LOG J LOCATION 29983 Valle Olvera Nicolas & Winchester The Village H.O.A. Hwy. 79 and Pala Road 30193 Via Norte 43810 Villa Del Sur 39531 Shadow View Court 31150 Santiago Road 43897 Northgate Avenue 30110 La Primavera 30556 Mira Loma Drive 42100 Main Street 31999 Vineyard Avenue 41910 Main Street 44115 Highlander Drive 45456 Clubhouse 29815 Marhill Circle 41848 Asteriod Way 41877 Enterprise Circle Starlight Ridge 42890 Agena 28327 Felix Valdez 30455 Shenandoah Court IREQUEST Tree trimming Oil Spill Street sweeper question Weeds Slope Repair A.C. repairs Edison vault sinking Street Repairs on San Pasqual Tree trimming Sidewalk failure Dead tree Pothole Trees trimming Debris R.O.W. Catch basin cleaning Catch basin lid Tree removal Root prune Channel cleaning Tree trimming Tree trimming Pothole repair Trash pick-up concern J WORK COMPLETED 10-04-93 10-05-93 10-05-93 10-07-93 10-07-93 10-08-93 10-15-93 10-15-93 10-13-93 10-13-93 10-15-93 10-18-93 10-18-93 10-19-93 10-19-93 10-19-93 10-21-93 10-22-93 10-22-93 10-22-93 10-26-93 10-26-93 10-28-93 -1 - pwO3%roadslwk,:mpltd%93%10. 110193 SERVICE ORDER REQUEST - October, 1993 10-28-93 10-28-93 10-29-93 10-29-93 42072 Paseo Rayo del Sol 30336 Milano Olymic Way 40395 Calle Fiesta Trash pick-up concern Tree trimming Potholes Tar in front of driveway 10-28-93 10-28-93 10-29-93 10-29-93 TOTAL $0R'$ 27 -2- pwO3%roedelwkcmpltd~,93~10. 110193 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION WORK COMPLETED OCTOBER 1993 SIGNS DATE 10-01-93 10-04-93 10-04-93 10,04-93 10-05-93 10-05-93 j~r06-93 1L ~1-93 10-07-93 1 O-12-93 10-14-93 10-14-93 10-18-93 10-18-93 10-20-93 10-21-93 10-21-93 10-25-93 LOCATION Montezuma ~i) Front Street Second Street (1) Front Street Pauba Road W/O Butterfield Stage Pauba Road W/O Butterfield Stage Via Halcon and La Serena Pauba Road at Meadows Parkway La Serena at transition Pauba Road EIO Margarita Del Rey Road W/O Felicita Rustic Glen ~) Margarita C. Pina Colada N/O Del Rey Road Tecomse at E. Loma Linda Main Street at Pujol Street Pujol Street at Main Street Front Street ~) Midnight Round-up Ynez S/O Rancho Vista Pauba E/O Ynez Road Calle Pina Colada ~) n. Gen. Kearney Replaced Replaced Repaired Repaired Repaired Installed WORK COMPLETED Replaced W-41 and R-61 (Old) R-1 (Old) R-2 '50" Knock down R-1 and S.N.S. R-1 R-2 "25" 3 Carsonites Replaced W-17 Replaced Repaired Installed Installed Repaired Replaced Installed Replaced Repaired Repaired W-65-1 (Bullet holes) W-9 S.N .S. 2 W-45 N.H.W. R-1 R-1 (Knock-down) 2 (Muni. Parking Signs) 2 W-41 (Graffiti) I W-41 (Graffiti) End Marker (Graffiti) TOTAL SIGNS REPLACED 10 TOTAL SIGNS INSTALLED 8 TOTAL SIGNS REPAIRED 8 pwO3%mede~wkcmplM%g3%egn 110293 DATE 10-04-93 10-04-93 10-05-93 10-05-93 10-06-93 10-06-93 10-08-93 10-12-93 10-18-93 10-18-93 10-18-93 10-19-93 10-19-93 10-19-93 10-25-93 10-28-93 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION WORK COMPLETED OCTOBER 1993 LOCATION Rancho California Road at Tajo Ynez N/O Town Center La Serena at General Kearney Via Puerta at La Serena Avenida della Reina Via Puerta 28801 Pujol Street 28581 Front Street 28653 Pujol Street 28465 Felix Valdez 30696, 30602, 30556 Mira Loma 28860 Front Street Calle Halcon at Elinda 28559 Pujol Street Margarita S/O N. Gen'l Kearney Santa Cecilia GRAFFITi REMOVAL WORK COMPLETED Removed 250 S.F. of Graffiti Removed 50 S.F. of Graffiti Removed Removed Removed 5 S.F. of Graffiti 4 S.F. of Graffiti 14 S.F. of Graffiti Removed 180 S.F. of Graffiti Removed 70 S.F. of Graffiti Removed 72 S.F. of Graffiti Removed 25 S.F. of Graffiti Removed 50 S.F. of Graffiti Removed 6 S.F. of Graffiti Removed 166 S.F. of Graffiti Removed 2 S.F. of Graffiti Removed 32 S.F. of Graffiti Removed 240 S.F. of Graffiti Removed 8 S.F. of Graffiti TOTAL LOCATIONS 18 TOTAL S.F. 1.174 -1- pwO3~roeds%wkcmpltd%93%10.Graff'nj 110193 J DATE 10-04-93 10-04-93 10-06-93 10-11-93 10-14-93 10-18-93 1 10-19-93 10-20-93 10-20-93 10-21-93 10-21-93 10-21-93 10-26-93 10-26-93 10-27-93 10-28-93 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION WORK COMPLETED OCTOBER 1993 LOCATION 2nd Street at Front Street Via Norte E/O Carmelita Circle Del Rey ~ Kaweah Pala Road ~ Loma Linda Loma Linda S/O Via Consuelo 28465 Felix Valdez Margarita between Moraga & Solaria Way Pauba Road and La Primavera Vallejo Channel Ynez N/O Pauba Ynez S/O Rancho Vista Rancho Vista E/O Ynez Road S. General Kearney at La Serena S. General Kearney at La Serena Winchester Road at Jefferson Winchester E/O Jefferson Via Lobo Channel WEED A BA TEMEN T WORK COMPLETED Cleared 750 S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds Cleared 4,000 S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds Cleared 1,700 S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds Cleared 1,500 S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds Cleared 3,000 S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds Cleared 200 SoF. of R.O.W. Weeds Cleared 2,000 S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds Cleared 5,050 S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds Cleared 8,500 S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds Cleared 250 S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds Cleared 750 S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds Cleared 750 S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds Cleared 11,250 S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds Cleared 6,000 S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds Cleared 2,050 S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds Cleared 500 S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds Cleared 9,000 S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds TOTAL R.O.W. WEED ABATEMENT 57,2~ $.F. -1- pwO3%roade%wkcmpltd~lO.Wee 110193 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION WORK COMPLETED OCTOBER 1993 DATE 10-01-93 10-04-93 10-07-93 10-11-93 10-12-93 10-13-93 10-13-93 10-14-93 10-19-93 10-20-93 10-20-93 10-20-93 10-21-93 LOCATION Area #1 (See dally for locations) Area #1 (See Daily for locations) Area #1 (See Daily for locations) Area #1 (See Daily for locations) Area #1 (See Daily for locations) Rancho Calif. Road ~i) Calla Aragon Area #1 (See Dally for locations) Area #1 (See Daily for locations) Margarita at Jedediah Smith 45456 Clubhouse Drive x?. 115 Highlander Area #2 (See Daily for locations) Area #2 (See Daily for locations) CA TCH BASINS WORK COMPLETED Cleaned and secured 24 Catch Basins Cleaned and secured 13 Catch Basins Cleaned and secured 49 Catch Basins Cleaned and secured 34 Catch Basins Cleaned and secured 25 Catch Basins Cleaned and secured I Catch Basin Cleaned and secured 12 Catch Basins Cleaned and secured 29 Catch Basins Cleaned and secured Cleaned and secured Cleaned and secured I Catch Basin I Catch Basin I Catch Basin Cleaned and secured 20 Catch Basins Cleaned and secured 32 Catch Basins - 1 - pw03%roads%wkcmpltd~93% 10.CB 110193 Cat~,h Basin-October, 1993 (Continued) 10-28-93 Area #2 (See Daily for locations) Cleaned and secured 29 Catch Basins TOTAL CATCH BASINS CLEANED AND SECURED 271 -2- pwO3%roads%wkcmpltd~93~,10.CB 110193 DATE 10-01-93 10-04-93 10-04-93 10-06-93 10-06-93 10-07-93 10-13-93 10-13-93 10-19-93 10-20-93 10-26-93 10-29-93 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION WORK COMPLETED OCTOBER 1993 I LOCATION Front Street at Montezuma 2nd Street at Front Street Vie Norte EIO Paseo Serreno Via Puerta at La Serene Del Rey Road at Del Reposo Del Rey Road W/O Felicita First Street at Cul-de-sac Pale Road S/O Loma Linda Pauba Road at Elinda Ynez NIO Pauba Winchester Road at Jefferson Agena at Southern Cross TREES WORK COMPLETED Trimmed 2 trees Trimmed 5 trees Trimmed I tree Trimmed 2 trees Trimmed 8 trees Trimmed 6 trees Trimmed 1 tree Trimmed 4 trees Trimmed 4 trees Trimmed 9 trees Trimmed I tree Trimmed I tree TOTAL a.,. b'ees rimmed pwO3~roade~wkcmpltd~93~10.tre 110193 LAND DEVELOPMENT Monthly Activity Report Special Projects October, 1993 Submitted by. Tim D. Serlet Prepared by,' Raymond A. Casey FFMA/OFS RFIMRURSFMFNT: Staff is continuing to coordinate with the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and the State Office of Emergency Services (OES) representatives in seeking reimbursement for costs incurred by the City due to the January 1993 floods and ensuing disaster declaration. To date we have received concurrence from representatives of both agencies totalling $729,000 in Damage Survey Reports (DSR) with an additional pending amount of $668,000 for the Murrieta Creek clean- up. The time frame for receiving those funds can vary from four (4) or five (5) months to as much as one (1) year or more depending on the amount of reimbursement and the complexity of each ~p~e, cific project. L,--FER ROAD: The cost of the project is estimated to be $188,000. The City will be reimbursed $20,000 from RCWD for the waterline relocation and up to 93.75% of the remaining costs from FEMA and OES. The other remaining 6.25% shall be funded through the proposed Zone "R" assessment for Liefer Road improvements. To date we have received $3,000 from OES. All amounts are approximate. pwOS%moectrpt%dev%ootober 110993 ~0 TRAFFIC DIVISION Monthly Activity Report For October, 1993 Submitted b~.~1'j D. Serlet 'm Prepared by: Marty Lauber Date: November 23, 1993 I. TRAFFIC REQUESTS II. TRAFFIC REQUESTS: Sept Oct Received 13 4 Completed 9 11 Under Investigation Scheduled for Traffic Commission ON GOING PROJECTS: 3 2 I 2 Completed inclusion of all staffs comments into taxi-cab ordinance to be brought back to Public/Traffic Safety Commission December 9, 1993 for final comments and recommendation to City Council. Traffic signals. 1. Margarita Road/Avenida Barca - Completing Design Drafting. 2. Nicolas Road/Winchester Road - Completing Design Drafting. 3. S.R. 79(s)/Margarita Road Incorporating Caltrans field review comments into design. Safe Route to School Committee - Completed data collection effort for High School safety investigation. Attended Public/Safety Traffic Commissioners Workshop with Commissioners Johnson and Coe. Applied for Barrier Rail Replacement Program Grant. Completed traffic signal controller upgrade for Ynez Road at Solana Way. Modified traffic signal timing along Ynez Road Corridor to accommodate for construction activities. pwl 5~oectrpt%traffic%ootober CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS Monthly Activity Report October, 1993 Submitted by.'~im D. Serlet Prepared by: Don Spagnolo Date: November 23, 1993 WORK UNDER CONSTRUCTION: Ynez Road: The Contractor has completed all of the median, and traffic signal improvements from Solana Way to the north end of the project. The Contractor is presently working on base paving the center lanes from Solana Way to the north end of the project. This work will be completed by November 13, 1993. The Contractor will cap pave the project during the week of November 15th and expects to complete clean-up of the project by the second week of December. CRC: A seal coat is being applied by the Contractor to the exterior masonry block of the gym, sound wall and retaining walls, after which an anti graffiti coating will be applied. The interior walls of the gym are being painted and will receive a final coat of paint in the next week. The Contractor is also in the process of completing the final touches on the outside of the building so that the windows and doors can be installed. The irrigation system for the project has been completed as well as a portion of the landscaping. Riverton Park: Installation of the main lines for irrigation and drinking water has been completed, and the irrigation laterals are being installed. The on-site drainage system is approximately 80% complete. The concrete footings and pad for the shade structure have been completed, and the concrete sidewalk system is about 65% complete. Playground equipment has been delivered to the site. Construction is expected to be complete by mid December. Jefferson Avenue Storm Drain: The Contractor has recently constructed the catch basin on the northeast and southeast side of Winchester Road and Jefferson Avenue and on the east side of Jefferson Avenue has installed approximately 90% of the underground pipe. All the work is being performed at night except for .the A.C. paving. pwl 5~moeotrpt\eip\october 1110 Rancho Vista Sidewalks: The project has been completed. A recommendation for acceptance will go to City Council on November 23, 1993. Pala Community Park: The contract was awarded to Martin J. Jaska, Inc. at the October 26, 1993 City Council meeting. The pre-construction meeting is scheduled for November 16, 1993. Construction of the site is expected to begin in late November. PROJECTS OUT TO BID: Pujol Street Imorovements: The project was re-bid with a bid opening of October 28, 1993. A recommendation to award a contract to the apparent low bidder will be presented at the November 23, 1993 City Council meeting. PROJECTS UNDER DESIGN: Soorts Park Slope Repair: Final design plans and specifications are nearly complete and are expected to be recommended for approval at the December 14, 1993 Council Meeting. Staff is in the process of obtaining the necessary permits for the channel improvements included in the plans and specifications as additive alternate no. 3. Margarita Road Sidewalk Improvements: Construction documents and specifications are being finalized by staff for sidewalk improvements on the east side of Margarita Road between Rancho Vista Road and Pauba Road. This project will be constructed with SB821 funds and is tentatively scheduled for construction during the last two (2) weeks of December, 1993. REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS Liefer Road, John Warner Road. Santiago Road and the Walcott Corridor: Staff is finalizing Requests for Proposals (RFP) for providing Professional Engineering Services to prepare plans, specifications and construction administration for the required road improvements. pwl 5~moectrpt~eip\october 1110 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ITEM NO. 1 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT TUESDAY, OCTOBER 26, 1993 A regular meeting of the Temecula Community Services District was called.. to order on Tuesday, October 12, 1993, 9:05 P.M., at the Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California· President Patricia H. Birdsall presiding. PRESENT: 5 ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: Muf~oz, Parks, Roberrs, Stone, Birdsall DIRECTORS: None Also present were City Manager David F. Dixon, Assistant City Manager Harwood Edvalson, City Attorney F. Scott Field, City Clerk June S. Greek and Recording Secretary Gail Zigler. PUBLIC COMMENT None CONSENT CALENDAR It was moved by Director Stone, seconded by Director Roberts to approve Consent Calendar Item No. I - 6. The motion was unanimously carried as follows: AYES: 5 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: Mufioz, Parks, Roberts, Stone, Birdsall DIRECTORS: None DIRECTORS: None e Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the minutes of the meeting of September 28, 1993. Acceotance of Grant Deed for Kent Hinteroardt Memorial Park - The Preslev Companies RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Accept a grant deed from The Presley Companies for Kent Hintergardt Memorial Park, a nine (9) acre park within Tract No. 23267-2, subject to the Presley Companies making suitable arrangements to clear title of the reservoir CSDMIN 1011 6193 - 1 - 11/02/93 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MINUTES OCTOBER 26, 1993 ~. easement. Such arrangements shall be approved by the Director of Community Services and the City Attorney. Award of Contract for Construction of Pala Community Park (Project No. PW93-03 CSD) RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Approve the plans and specifications for the construction of Pala Community Park, Project No. PW93-03 CSD; 3.2 Award a construction contract in the amount of $2,757,566. to Martin J. Jaska, Inc. and authorize the President to execute the contract; 3.3 3.4 Authorize the General Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency of $275,756.60 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount; Approve an agreement with Kingsway Development Corporation to reimburse the City $149,015. for off-site street and flood control improvements. Community Services Recreation Brochure RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Accept proposal of $20,893. from Graphics Unlimited to produce two (2) issues of the Community Services Recreation Brochure. Contract Amendment - California Landscaoe, Inc. RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Amend contract with California Landscape, Inc. for landscape maintenance services, to include John Magee Park, Kent Hintergardt Memorial Park, and the Medians Service Area. Contract Amendment - Excel Landscaoe RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Amend the contract for landscape maintenance services with Excel Landscape to include the addition of Slope Service Area "A". CSDMIN10/16/93 -2- 11/02/93 OCTOBER 96. 1993 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MINUTES DISTRICT BUSINESS 7. Flood Control Consideration - Northwest SPorts Comolex Community Services Director Shawn Nelson presented the staff report. It was moved by Director Stone, seconded by Director Roberrs to approve staff recommendation as follows: RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 Receive and file report concerning the feasibility of utilizing the Northwest Sports Complex for recreation and flood retention purposes. The motion was unanimously carried as follows: AYES: 5 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: Mufioz, Parks, Roberts, Stone, Birdsall DIRECTORS: None DIRECTORS: None Emergency Commercial Landscaoe Prooram Community Services Director Shawn Nelson presented the staff report. Mayor Mur~oz stepped down due to a potential conflict of interest. President Birdsall asked if the Crystal Ridge Business Park was an association such as a homeowners association and if so will the property owners be forced to enter into this agreement. Director Nelson advised all the property owners within the Crystal Ridge Business Park must sign the agreement and give permission to enter into this agreement with the City. He said Mr. Omdahl has submitted the signatures from the Crystal Ridge Business Park property owners to the City. President Birdsall asked if the City continues to provide this and develops an assessment next year, will it be a minimal service, or will the area have to be brought up to City standards. Director Nelson said staff would recommend continuing with the minimal service under an interim program to allow the property owner to get back on their feet. CSDMIN 1011 6193 -3- 11/02/93 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MINUTES OCTOBER 26.1993 ~ It was moved by Director Parks, seconded by Director Stone to approve staff recommendation as follows: RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 Approve the implementation of an emergency commercial landscape program for the City of Temecula; 8.2 Appropriate $17,000 from TCSD Service Level "C" Fund Balance to account #190-180-999-5240 to provide minimum landscaping services for Crystal Ridge Business Park; 8.3 Authorize the General Manager to execute a reimbursement agreement with Crystal Ridge Business Park concerning emergency commercial landscaping services. The motion carried as follows: AYES: 4 DIRECTORS: Parks, Roberts, Stone, Birdsall NOES: 0 DIRECTORS: None ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None ABSTAIN: I DIRECTORS: Mur~oz GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT None DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT None BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS President Birdsall advised she will not be attending the November 23, 1993 meeting due to a conflicting meeting with the National League of Cities Conference on Human Development Policy. Director Parks invited all members of the public to participate in the Holiday Lights and Festive Sights event. CSDMIN 10116/93 -4- '11/02/93 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MINUTES OCTOBER 26, 1993 ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Director Parks, seconded by Director Roberrs to adjourn at 8:45 P.M. The motion was unanimously carried. The next regular meeting of the City of Temecula Community Services District will be held on Tuesday, November 9, 1992, 8:00 PM, Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California. ATTEST: President Patricia H. Birdsall June S. Greek, City Clerk CSDMIN 10/1 6193 -5-. 11/02193 ITEM NO. APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY ~~.~~ FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: Board of Directors FROM: David F. Dixon, General Manager DATE: November 23, 1993 SUBJECT: Parks and Recreation Master Plan PREPARED BY: ~hawn RECOMMENDATION: D. Nelson, Director of Community Services Adopt a Resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. CSD 93- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ADOPTING THE PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN DISCUSSION: On November 9, 1993, the City Council approved the City of Temecula's first General Plan, which identifies strategies to promote the quality of life in Temecula and assist in properly planning for an expanding population and future development. In the Open Space Element of the General Plan, it recommends that the City complete a Parks and Recreation Master Plan to develop parks, trails, and open space strategies to address current needs and plan for future development requirements. On September 10, 1991, the City Council formed the Parks and Recreation Master Plan Committee comprised of Sal Munoz and Pat Birdsall from the City Council, Evelyn Harker from the Community Services Commission, and Bill Perlett, Barbara Pearson, Lettie Boggs, and Laverne Stafford from the community. The firm of Purkiss Rose - RSI Landscape Architecture was selected as the consultant to facilitate the development of the master plan document. Two public workshops were held in October and December of 1991 to receive public input regarding potential park sites, recreation facilities, multi-use trails, and operational requirements. Further, a telephone survey was completed with 400 residents to receive additional input regarding recreational needs in the community. The culmination of this input was included in the drafts that were presented to the Parks and Recreation Master Plan Committee. After several committee meetings, the master plan was approved by the committee and recommended to the Community Services Commission for approval. The master plan is divided into the following sections: 1 ,m~agend.lm~mistplmn.m:ln 111293 1. Executive Summary 2. Introduction Overview and summary of the master plan document. Provides current and historical information regarding the City. 3. Supply Analysis Identifies the current parks, facilities, and recreation programs. 4. Demand Analysis Determines the types of recreation programs and activities that the community desires. 5. Needs Assessment Identifies the parks and recreation facilities that are required to meet the recreation demand. 6. Implementation Plan Develops policies and strategies to implement the development of parks, recreation facilities, and multi-use trails. The Parks and Recreation Master Plan was approved by the Community Services Commission on November 9, 1992 and approved by the Planning Commission on February 22, 1993. The master plan was not forwarded to the Board of Directors for final approval because the City Council instructed staff to delay the approval of the master plan until the General Plan was adopted. FISCAL IMPACT: Costs associated with the development of parks and recreation facilities that are identified in the Parks and Recreation Master Plan for the next five (5) years are included in the City's Capital Improvement Plan for FY 1994-98. Attachments: Parks and Recreation Master Plan forwarded to Board of Directors under separate cover. 1 e~agendae~ne~lcplen.edn 111293 RESOLUTION NO. CSD 93- A RESOLUTION OF ~ BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ~ TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ADOFrING ~ PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN. WHEREAS, The City Council adopted the first General Plan for the City of Temecula on November 9, 1993; and WH!~REAS, The General Plan for the City of Temecuh calls for the preparation of a Master Plan to address park, trail, and recreation needs within the City; and WI~~, The Board of Directors directed the Community Services Department to prepare a detailed Master Plan to address the communities long-term needs for recreational facilities and programs; and WItF~REAS, The Master Plan will provide a long-term plan for all new and existing park facilities, trail and bikeway networks, and recreation programs within the City; and WttY. REAS, a draft of the Master Plan was completed on September 1, 1992; and WHEREAS, the Community Servic~ Commission approved the Plan on November 9, 1992; and WHERE., the Planning Commission approved the Plan on February 22, 1993; and WItEREAS, notice of the proposed Ordinance was posted at City Hall, County Library, Rancho California Branch, the U.S. Post Office and the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce; and WIt~REAS, a public hearing was conducted on November 23, 1993, at which time interested persons has an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition; NOW, THEREFORE, THY~ BOARD OF DIRECTORS FOR THE COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Environmental Compliance. An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared for the City of Temecula's General Plan. This EIR was approved by the City Council on November 9, 1993, which is inclusive of the Parks and Recreation Master Plan. Section 2. Adoption of the Plan. The Parks and Recreation Master Plan as amended, is hereby approved and adopted. PASSRD, APPROVRr~, AND ADOFrED, this day, the __ day of ,1993. Patrich H. Birdsall, President ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk\Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMECUI~) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk\Secretary of the City of Temecuh Community Services District, I-~.RRRy DO CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. CSD 93- was duly intwduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecuh on the __ day of , 1993, and that thereafter, said Resolution was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the __ day of __, 1993, by the following roll call vote: BOARD OF DIRECTORS: NOES: BOARD OF DIRECTORS: BOARD OF DIRECTORS: June S. Greek, City Clerk\Secretary DEPARTMENTAL REPORT APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER - ~_ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: Board of Directors FROM: David F. Dixon, General Manager DATE: November 23, 1993 SUBJECT: Departmental Report PREPARED BY: <~Shawn D. Nelson, Director of Community Services DISCUSSION: Staff has been working with the Temecula Museum Foundation to determine a permanent location for the Temecula Museum. The Museum Foundation requested to construct the museum facility and rehabilitate the church building at Sam Hicks Monument Park utilizing the ~500,000 budgeted in the City's Redevelopment Agency. In return, the museum will provide access from Moreno Road to the Senior Center as a part of the project's improvements. Further, the Museum Foundation has stated that no additional rent monies will be requested from the City if the museum can be constructed at the park. This request was approved by the Board of Directors on November 9, 1993. Staff is preparing to schedule a Project Committee meeting to determine the design components of this project in December, 1993. The City has scheduled a pre-construction meeting for the Pala Community Park Project. It is hoped that construction will begin on this park site in December, 1993. The Parks and Recreation Master Plan has been reviewed and approved by the Community Services and Planning Commissions. The Master Plan will be considered by the Board of Directors at the November 23, 1993 meeting. The Kent Hintergardt Memorial Park located in the Presley Development has completed the 90 day maintenance period. This park should be dedicated to the City in January, 1994. The construction of Paloma Del Sol Park is completed. This park consists of two lighted ballfields with soccer overlays, restroom/snack bar facility, and parking improvements. The City is currently working with Kemper Development Company, the developer who constructed the park, to determine the proposed dedication date for the site. Phase II of the Community Recreation Center (CRC) Project is moving forward at an excellent pace. Staff is now working with the CRC Foundation to determine equipment and furniture needs for the CRC. It is anticipated that the CRC will be completed in January, 1994, with a dedication date tentatively scheduled for February, 1994. r:.%a%agendaK~eptO01 .edn 111693 The Board of Directors selected the firm of J. F. Davidson Associates Inc. to provide the design services for the Rancho California Sports Park Improvement Project. A Project Committee comprised of members from the Board of Directors, Community Services Commission, skateboarders and Teen Council members will assist in developing a design for the skateboarding area. The construction of Riverton Park began on September 27, 1993. Construction is now underway with most of grading now completed. It is anticipated that the park construction will be completed in December, 1993, and ready for dedication in April, 1994. Staff will be meeting with the Temecula Town Association to execute e lease agreement for the Northwest Sports Complex in the near future. Also, a modification of the existing park use ordinance will be pursued to address this site as a special use park. This policy was reviewed and approved by the Community Services Commission on November 8, 1993. This item will be considered by the Board of Directors on December 14, 1993. Staff was able to obtain a right of entry letter from the property owner adjacent to Loma Linda Park to abate weeds that were on this site. Staff is planning on moving forward with improving this area once clear title is obtained. Our City Attorney is working with the final lien holder to resolve this issue. r:.%a%agenda:'%deptO01 .:dn 111593 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ITEM NO. MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY TUESDAY, OCTOBER 26, 1993 A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency was called to order on Tuesday, October 26, 1993, 8:45 P.M., at the Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California, Chairperson Ronald J. Parks presiding. PRESENT: 5 AGENCY MEMBERS: Birdsall, Roberts, Stone, Mu~oz, Parks ABSENT: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None Also present were City Manager David F. Dixon, Assistant City Manager Harwood Edvalson, City Attorney Scott F. Field, City Clerk June S. Greek and Recording Secretary Gail Zigler. PUBLIC COMMENT None AGENCY BUSINESS 1. Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the minutes of September 28, 1993. It was moved by Agency Member Roberts, seconded by Agency Member Stone to approve the minutes of September 28, 1993, deleting "the" under Adjournment. The motion was unanimously approved as follows: AYES: 5 AGENCY MEMBERS: Birdsall, Roberrs, Stone, Mufloz, Parks None NOES: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT City Manager David Dixon said the RTC has stated they will advise him by Friday, October 29, on the results of the bid the City of Temecula has submitted for the Rancho West Apartments. RDAMIN10/26/93 -1- 11/02/93 TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENCY MEMBER'S REPORTS None OCTOBER 26, 1993 ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Agency Member Murioz, seconded by Agency Member Roberrs to adjourn at 8:50 P.M. The motion was unanimously carried. The next regular meeting of the City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency will be held on November 9, 1993, 8:00 PM, Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California. Chairperson Ronald J. Parks ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk RDAMIN10/26193 -2- 11/02193