HomeMy WebLinkAbout092893 CC AgendaAGENDA
TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
A REGULAR MEETING
TEMECULA COMMUNITY CENTER - 28816 Pujol Street
SEPTEMBER 28, 1993 - 7:00 PM
At approximately 9:45 PM, the City Council will
determine which of the remaining agenda items
can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00
PM and may continue all other items on which
additional time is required until · future meeting.
All meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 PM
EXECUTIVE SESSION: 5:30 PM - Closed Session of the City Council pursuant to
Govemment Code Sacdon 54956.9{b) - Zone Change 93-0043
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. 93-17
Resolution: No. 93-77
CALL TO ORDER:
Mayor J. Sal Mur~oz presiding
Invocation
Associate Pastor Pat Dezort, World Harvest Outreach
Flag Salute
Councilmember Parks
ROLL CALL:
Birdsall, Parks, Roberrs, Stone, Mufioz
PRESENTATIONS/
PROCLAMATIONS
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Presentation to City of Temecula - Certificate of Achievement
for Excellence in Financial Reporting for Fiscal Year 1992
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Council
on items that are not listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are
limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council about an item
not listed on the Agenda or on the consent Calendar, a pink "Request To Speak' form
should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name end address.
~gend~OI2113 I 01/23/13
For all other agenda items a "Request To Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk
befor~ the Council gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual
speakers.
CITY COUNCIL RI:PORTS
Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be
made at this time. A total, not to exceed, ten (10) minutes will be devoted to these
reports.
CONSENTCALENDAR
2
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be
enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless
members of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent
Calendar for separate action.
Standard Ordinance Adootion Procedure
RECOMMENDATION
1.1
Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions
included in the agenda.
Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
-2.1
Approve the minutes of August 17, 1993;
2.2
Approve the minutes of August 31, 1993;
3
Resolution Aoorovinq List of Demands
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1
Adopt a resolution emitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
Aeende/OI211l 2 09/23/13
4
Combining Balance Sheets as of June 30. 1993 and the Statement of Revenues.
Exoenditures and Changes in Fund Balance. and the Statement of Revenues. Exoenses
and Chanaes in Retained Earnines for the Year Ended June 30.1993
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1
Receive and file the Combining Balance Sheets as of June 30, 1993 and
the Statement of Revenues, 'Exl~enditures and Changes in Fund Balance,
and the Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Retained
Earnings for the Year Ended June 30, 1993.
Resolution to Particioate in the Alternative Method for Distribution of Tax Levies and
Collections and of Tax Sale Proceeds Adooted by the County of Riverside
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA MADE
PURSUANT TO SECTION 4715 OF THE REVENUE AND TAXATION CODE OF
THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA AGREEING TO PARTICIPATE IN THE
ALTERNATIVE METHOD FOR DISTRIBUTION OF TAX LEVIES AND
COLLECTIONS AND OF TAX SALE PROCEEDS ADOPTED BY THE COUNTY OF
RIVERSIDE
6
Adootion of Travel Policv
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1 Approve travel policy.
7
Resolution Establishina Pettv Cash Fund ~for the City of Temecule
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
ESTABLISHING A 'PETTY CASH" FUND
OF TEMECULA
,a~ende/082103 3 01/23/93
9
10
11
12
Final Vestina Tract Mao No..~6861-F
RECOMMENDATION:
8.1 Approve Final Vesting Tract Map No. 26861-F subject to the attached
Conditions of Approval.
Final Vestin. Tract Mao No. 23125-1
RECOMMENDATION:
9.1 Approve Final Vesting
Conditions of Approval.
Tract Map No. 23125-1 subject to the attached
Access to State and LocBI Summary Criminal History Information
RECOMMENDATION:
10.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
AUTHORIZING ACCESS TO SUMMARY CRIMINAL HISTORY INFORMATION
THROUGH FINGERPRINT CHECKS
Vacation of a Portion of Second Street
RECOMMENDATION:
11.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA,
CALIFORNIA OF NOTICE OF INTENTION TO VACATE A PORTION OF SECOND
STREET SOUTHWESTERLY OF FRONT STREET AND SETTING A PUBLIC
HEARING THEREON PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY PROVIDED BY CHAPTER
3, PART 3, DIVISION 9 OF THE STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE
Award of Contract for Puiol St. and First St. Street Widenin. (Project No. PW92-09)
RECOMMENDATION:
12.1
Waive any irregularities and inform bidders in connection with the Pre-
Bid conference and site inspection, find that Highgrade Engineering, Inc.
is the lowest responsible bidder, and award a contract for Pujol St. &
First St. Street Widening, Project No. PW92-09, to for ~72,595.25, end
authorize the Mayor to execute the contract;
~gendaR)92113 4
12.2
Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the
contingency amount of $7,259.53, which is equal to 10% of the
contract amount.
13
Contract Chanae Orders No. 14. and 17 through 20 for Ynez Road Widenino Project.
PW9:}-05. CFD88-1 ~
RECOMMENDATION:
13.1
Approve. Contract Change Orders No. 14, and 17 through 20 for Ynez
Road Widening Project, PW92-05 for labor and equipment for various
items of work, in the amount of S76,703.33.
14
Community Facilities District 88-12. Reimbursement Aoreements for Work Performed
Durina the Construction of Ynez Road Widening Project (PW92-O5)
RECOMMENDATION:
14.1
Approve 8 reimbursement agreement with Rancon Realty Limited
Partnership for improvements to be constructed by the City's Contractor
for the Ynez Road Widening Project PW92-05, in the amount of
$27,769.27.
15 Lease of Shared Yard Facility for Public Works and Community Services Departments
RECOMMENDATION:
15.1
Approve the lease agreement between Richard Gabriel and the City of
Temecula, for property located at 28763 Front Street (corner of Front
and l st Street) for use as a combined public works and community
services department maintenance yard; and authorize the Mayor to
execute the agreement.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
16
Resolution Amendino Expenditure of Tax Increment Funds of The RedeveloDment
Agency for Construction of Senior Citizen Center
RECOMMENDATION:
16.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
AMENDING THE EXPENDITURE OF TAX INCREMENT FUNDS OF THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A SENIOR CITIZEN
CENTER IN A REDEVELOPMENT AREA
/Weeda/OI21e3 ·
17
Aooeal of Plannino Commission Aooroval of PA93-0009. Tentative Parcel Mao No.
25059. First Extension of Time and PA93-0010. Plot Plan No. 34. First Extension of
Time - Crystal Ridge
RECOMMENDATION:
17.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 93-0009, FIRST EXTENSION OF
TIME FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 25059 TO SUBDIVIDE A 5.51 ACRE
PARCEL INTO 4 PARCELS LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF RIDGE PARK
DRIVE APPROXIMATELY 70 FEET SOUTH OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD
AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 945-130-0003
17.2
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 93-0010, FIRST EXTENSION OF
TIME FOR PLOT PLAN NO. 34 TO CONSTRUCT A 102,243 SQUARE FOOT
OFFICE BUILDING, A 7,872 SQUARE FOOT RESTAURANT, A 7,000 SQUARE
FOOT RESTAURANT AND A FOUR LEVEL PARKING STRUCTURE ON A 5.51
ACRE PARCEL LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF RIDGE PARK DRIVE
APPROXIMATELY 70 FEET SOUTH OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AND
KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 945-130-003
COUNCIL BUSINESS
18 Status Reoort on Vendino Carts
(Continued from the meeting of 9/14/93)
RECOMMENDATION:
18.1
Provide direction to staff on the regulation of vending carts.
19 Certification of Referendum Petitions
RECOMMENDATION:
19.1
Receive end file the City Clerk's Certificate of Sufficiency;
19.2
Provide instruction to staff on the desired future course of action.
20
Discussion of Aooroval Matrix
(Continued from the meeting of 9/14193)
RECOMMENDATION:
20.1 Provide direction to staff relative to amendments to the existing
Ordinance.
21
Community Services Commission Aooointment
RECOMMENDATION:
21.1
Review the Ad-Hoc Committee recommendations and appoint one
applicant to serve 8 full three-year term on the Temecula Community
Services Commission.
22
Consideration of Fundine ReQuest for Local Health Clinic Sponsored by Shard Hospital
of Murrieta
(Placed on the agenda at the request of Mayor Mutioz)
DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS
CITY MANAGER REPORT
CITY ATTORNEY REPORT
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: October 12, 1993, 7:00 PM, Temecula Community Center,
28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California
'TEMECULA :COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETINn - Fro be :held at 8:00)
Next in Order:
CALL TO ORDER:
President Patricie H. Birdsall
Ordinance: No. 93-01
Resolution: No. 93-07
ROLL CALL:
DIRECTORS:
Mu~oz, Parks, Roberts, Stone, Birdsall
PUBLIC COMMENT:
Anyone wishing to. address the Board of Directors, should
present a completed pink "Request to Speak" to the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state
your name and address for the record.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Combinina Balance Sheet as of June 30. 1993 and the Statement of Revenues.
Exoenditures and Changes in Fund Balance for the Year Ended June 30.1993
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1
Receive and file the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes
in Fund Balance for the Year Ended June 30, 1993;
1.2
Transfer $37,808 from various recreation operating accounts to Project
Employees' Salaries.
2
3
Resolution Establishina a Petty Cash Fund for Temecula Community Services District
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 93-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ESTABLISHING A 'PETTY CASH' FUND
Namino of CRC Amohitheater
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1
Approve naming the Amphitheater in the Temecula Community
Recreation Center as the Thomas H. Langley Amphitheater.
~181di012113 ·
DISTRICT BUSINESS
4 Rancho Del Sol Landscaoe Improvements
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Receive and file report regarding the slope maintenance survey of
property owners along Margarita Road within the Rancho Del Sol and
Verano Developments.
GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT - DIxon
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT - Nelson
BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT: Next regular meeting October 12, 1992, 8:00 PM, Temecula Community
Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California
TEMECU~ 'REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY":MEETiNG' .i .... · ..... · :.
CALL TO ORDER:
ROLL CALL:
Chairperson Ronald J. Parks presiding
AGENCY MEMBERS: Birdsall, Roberts,
Parks
Stone, Mufioz,
PUBLIC COMMENT:
Anyone wishing to address the Agency, should present a
completed pink 'Request to Speak" to the City Clerk. When you
are called to speak, please come forward and state your name
end address for the record.
AGENCY BUSINESS
Combinino Balance Sheet as of June 30. 1993 and the Statement of Revenues.
Exoenditures and Changes in Fund Balance for the Year Ended June 30.1993
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1
Receive and file the Combining Balance Sheet as of June 30, 1993 end
the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures end Changes in Fund Balance
for the Year Ended June 30, 1993.
1.2
Appropriate $3,274 for Other Outside Services (legal costs relating to
the Rancho West Apartments) in the Low/Moderate Housing Set Aside
Fund.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
AGENCY MEMBER'S REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT: Next regular meeting October 12, 1993, 8:00 PM, Temecula Community
Center, 28816, Temecula, California
Aeendd)12113 10 01/23~3
ITEM
NO.
1
ITEM
NO.
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, AUGUST 17, 1993
A regular meeting of the City of Temecula City Council was called to order on Tuesday,
August 17, 1993, 7:05 P.M., at the Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street,
Temecula, California, Mayor J. Sal Mufioz presiding. Mayor Pro Tem Roberrs led the flag
salute.
PRESENT: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Parks, Roberrs, Stone,
Mufioz
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Also present were City Manager David F. Dixon, Assistant City Manager Herwood T.
Edvalson, City Attorney F. Scott Field, City Clerk June S. Greek and Recording Secretary Gail
Zigler.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Councilmember Parks asked for consensus from the Council to re-assign him as the delegate
to the Riverside County Habitat Conservation Agency and to appoint Mayor Mufioz as
alternate. The overall consensus from the Council was approval.
Mayor Mufioz advised that he attended a transportation planning meeting at the invitation of
3rd District Supervisor Kay Cincineros, to study a transportation corridor projected to extend
from the San Diego County line to the metrolink in Hemet.
Mayor Mufioz advised that he received a route analysis of RTA Line 23, and during July 1993,
4,435 passengers were serviced by Line 23 in Temecula.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. Citv of Temecula General Plan, Imolementation ProQram, Environmental Imoact Reoort
and Mitiqation Monitoring Proqram
Draft Land Use Plan:
Planning Director Gary Thornhill asked the Council's permission to allow the Director
of Public Works to discuss the issue of the North General Kearny extension.
CCMINOII17/93 -1 - 1/30/93
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
AUGUST 17.1993
Mayor .Pro Tem Roberts end Councilmember Birdsell stepped down due to a conflict
of interest.
Director of Public Works Tim Serlet presented the staff report for Tract 23583 and
access alternatives in Meadowview. Director Serlet advised that staff is requesting
direction from the Council on which alternative route they would like staff to bring
back to the Council for approval.
Councilmember Parks stated he is in favor of Alternative No. 3.
Councilmember Stone stated that the Council's intent by not extending North General
Kearney Road was to reduce traffic impacts in Meadowview and to remain consistent
he feels the Council should support Alternative No. 2.
Mayor Mu~oz asked Director Serlet what staff's preferred alternative was.
Director Serlet stated staff preferred Alternative No. 3, based on easiest fire response
and reduced congestion.
The Council consensus was as follows:
Support staff recommendation (Alternative No. 3) for North General Kearny Road
between Calle Norte and Calle Madera in the Circulation Element.
(Councilmember Birdsall and Mayor Pro Tem Roberts abstained due to a potential
conflict of interest.)
Mayor Mufioz opened the public hearing at 7:25 P.M.
Grouo IV- Westside Foothills
Howard OmClahl, 45850 Via Vaquero Road, Temecula, asked for clarification of the
Business Park designation.
Planner David Hogan stated that the General Plan envisions two different zoning
designations to implement business park: 1) office, manufacturing end warehousing;
and 2)light industrial.
Councilmember Parks stated that he would support lIP and high density mixed together
on Map 44.
Howard Omdahl, owner of Map 51, said that he does not want this parcel to have a
different designation than the other parcels in the business park.
Planner Hogan stated that the recommendation was to make this parcel consistent
with the overall business park.
CCMIN08/17193 -2- 8/30/03
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES AUGUST 17.1993
The overall consensus of the Council was as follows:
Support staff recommendation for Group IV (Westside Foothills, Map Nos. 15, 39,
42.1,43, 44, 46 and 51 ) with the exception that Map 44 will be designated for High
density, Business Park and Open Space as shown on the draft Land Use Map.
Grouo V- Nicolas Valley
Sanford Edward, 110 Newport Center Drive, Newport Beach, representing Roripaugh
Ranch, Inc., stated that on Parcel No. 8 (a 800 acre parcel and a 160 acre parcel) staff
recommends three dwelling units per acre, however the Planning Commission has
indicated they would like to see a Specific Plan. Mr. Edward stated the applicant
would like the low designation changed to a low-medium designation to allow approval
of three dwelling units per acre without having to apply for a General Plan amendment.
Director Thornhill asked for time to allow staff to discuss this issue with the applicant
and bring it back to the Council.
Larry Lynch, 14352 Chandler Boulevard, Van Nuys, representing D.L. Equitias, the
owner of the Bella Vista Properties, indicated support of staff recommendation. Mr.
Lynch commended staff and the City Council on the City's General Plan process.
Richard Stevens, representing The Keith Companies, 22690 Cactus, Moreno Valley,
supporting the request by Sanford Edwards for Roripaugh Ranch, Inc.
The overall consensus of the Council was as follows:
Map No. 8 - The target density will be established at three (3) units per acre. Maps
16, 23, 27, 35, 55, 56, 57, 59, and 61 - supported the Planning Commission
recommendation to place all. of the maps in a Special Study Area.
Mayor Mu~oz declared a recess at 8:05 P.M. and excused himself due to illness. The meeting
reconvened at 8:20 P.M. with Mayor Pro Tem Roberrs presiding.
Land Use MaD Clean-Up
Request N0. 30:
Councilmember Stone said he feels this area is over designated with commercial
zoning. He said that based on the policies of the General Plan and the close proximity
to the school district bus barn location, he feels an industrial or business park
designation would be more appropriate.
Csaba Ko, representing Kemper Development for Map No. 30, stated that he views
this site as a large user site.
cc~aNo~w. -a- ewe
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
AUGUST 17.1993
Councilmember Birdsall said she feels this is a prime location for commercial
development.
Councilmember Parks stated he feels a business park designation is not as compatible
as a commercial. designation.
Planning Director Thornhill said that either designation would be appropriate. He said
that the issue is more whether the commercial is spread out or compact along the
highway.
Councilmember Parks stated he does not support a business park designation with the
proposed school bus barn and asked for the Councils support of the commercial
designation.
Mayor Pro Tern Robarts said he is concerned with the traffic generated by additional
commercial along this corridor.
Staff agreed to bring this item back at the next general plan hearing.
Reouest No. 31:
Dean Allen, 27450 Ynez Road, (representing Johnson & Johnson), advised the Council
that the Vested Tentative Map on the property expired and was redesigned with higher
density than the original map.
Councilmember Stone said he is concerned about the buffering of this property from
the Woodcrest Homes and with the number of high density projects adjacent to this
property.
Planning Director Gary Thornhill stated there is buffering and an elevation gradient
between the high density and the residential.
The overall consensus was in support' of staff recommendation for a 'land use
designation of high density.
Dean Allen, representing Imocal for Map 13 which is adjacent to Map 31, requested
a small portion of the property on the west-side be designated commercial and the
remainder designated medium density.
Planning Director Gary Thornhill advised the Council that the Planning Commission is
not in support of Mr. Allen's request. Director Thornhill said that he feels there should
be low-medium density adjacent to the residential because there is less of a grade on
this property. He advised that the applicant has the option of applying for a General
Plan amendment, but recommended that the Council adhere to the Planning
Commission recommendation.
CCMIN08/17183 -4- 1/30/13 ·
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
AUGUST 17. '1993
City Manager David Dixon advised that a General Plan amendment was applied for
however denied by the Planning Commission.
The consensus of the Council was to deny a change of designation.
Dean Allen, representing a piece of property south on Rancho California Road just past
Moraga, requested an R-2 designation,
Director Thornhill advised that staff is concerned with the property's location relative
to the surrounding single family homes.
The Council directed this item back to staff for further review and a follow-up report.
Staff requested that the parcel East of Map No. 42.6 near the intersection of Diaz and
Rancho California Road be amended to match the land use for Map No. 42.6.
Reouest No. 10:
Councilmember Birdsall said she feels very low density is not the answer for this
property due to its close proximity to the ARCO gas station/mini-mart.
The overall consensus of the Council was to designate the land use for this area
offi ce/professi ona l.
John Moramarco, P.O. Box 906, Temecula, asked if the City has received any
information from Col Trans regarding additional access along State Highway 79 South.
Growth Manaoement/Public Facilities Element (School Facilities Policv):
City Attorney Scott Field presented the staff report summarizing the City's legal
position to the Council.
Dave Gallaher, Director of Facilities Development, Temecula Valley Unified School
District, 31350 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, distributed a copy of a suggested
change in language, as presented by the school district, to the City Council and legal
counsel.
Lettie Boggs, Temecula Valley Unified School District, 31350 Rancho Vista Road,
Temecula, presented and reviewed the long-range planning map for TVUSD.
Cheryl Langley, 40451 Calle Fiesta, Temecula, addressed the Council with her
concerns regarding overcrowding in schools and the quality of education.
Alex Bowie, 4920 Campus Drive, Newport Beach, attorney for TVUSD, presented the
school district's request for an amendment to the language in the school facilities
policy.
CClVIINO811 7193 -t- i
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES AUGUST 17..1993
Councilmember Stone asked what the City's legal risk would be, if the language
proposed by the school district was incorporated in the general plan. Alex Bowie said
that issues may be raised by the developers on a project by project basis.
Mayor Pro Tam Robarts asked if the school district would represent the City of
Temecula in the event of a lawsuit. Alex Bowie stated he feels that is a reasonable
request from the City.
City Attorney Field advised the Council that the two pages of language presented were
not addressed when legal counsel made their recommendation. Attorney Field said he
has no problem with the language in the way it is being presented to the Council.
Councilmember Parks asked for time to review all the information presented tonight.
He said he is concerned about giving up development approval rights based on what
the school district says requires mitigation.
It was the overall consensus of the City Council to continue the Growth
Management/Public Facilities Element (School Facilities Policy) to the next general plan
hearing with the understanding that the City Attorney will review the documents
presented at this hearing to make any minor wording modifications necessary for a
final determination.
CITY MANAGER REPORT
None
CITY ATTORNEY REPORT
None
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Parks to adjourn at
10:20 P.M. The motion was carried unanimously with Mayor Muf~oz absent.
The next regular meeting of the Temecula City Council will be held on Tuesday, August 24,
1993, 7:00 PM, Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California.
The next General Plan Public Hearing will be held on Tuesday, September 21,1993, 7:00 PM,
Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California.
ATTEST:
Mayor J. Sal Muftoz
City Clerk June S. Greek
CCMINO8/17193
4- 1/30/13
MINUTES OF AN ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, AUGUST 31, 1993
An adjourned regular meeting of the City of Temecula City Council was called to order on
Tuesday, August 31, 1993, 6:10 P.M., at the Tamecula City Hall Main Conference Room,
43174 Business Park. Drive, Temecula, California. Mayor J. Sal Mur~oz presiding.
Councilmember Stone led the flag salute.
PRESENT: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Parks, Stone, Mur~oz
ABSENT: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Roberts
Also present were Assistant City Manager Harwood Edvalson, City Clerk June S. Greek and
Recording Secretary Gall Zigler.
PUBLIC 'COMMENTS
Jayme Christian, 30762 Calle PiCa Colada, Temecula, presented the City Council with a
petition requesting installation of speed undulations, approved by 78% of the homeowners
on Calle PiCa Colada.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Councilmember Parks advised he artended a WRCOG meeting on August 30, 1993. He said
a special task force is being formed to review solid waste and green waste removal and
recycling· Councilmember Parks recommended Mayor Pro Tem Roberrs be appointed to that
task force committee. The Council concurred by consensus.
Mayor Mu~oz advised the Council of a meeting with Zev Buffman, developer of the
Blockbuster Pavilion in Devore. Mayor Mu~oz said Mr. Buffman presented him with a plan
for the Old Town area and suggested the Council hold a workshop so that Mr. Buffman can
present what he envisions for Old Town Temecula.
COUNCIL BUSINESS
CCMIN08/31193
Status of Assessment Districts 159 and 161
Edward Cooper, Administrative Engineer, Riverside County Transportation Department,
introduced the following representatives:
Greg Aguilar, Trans Pacific Consultants, responsible for design of the district.
Paul Thompson, Albert A. Webb & Associates, responsible for methodology of
-1- 09111193
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES AUGUST 31, 1993
the speed and portions of the construction inspection.
Frank Sherkow, Director of Transportation and Land Management, Riverside
County Transportation Department.
Dave Barnhart, County Transportation Manager, .Riverside County
Transportation Department.
Greg Aguilar distributed an August 30, 1993 Assessment District 159 Status Update
Report and provided an overview of the projects.
Frank Sherkow discussed the fiscal status of Assessment District 159.
Mayor Pro Tem Roberts arrived at 7:00 P.M.
Mayor Mu~oz stated he feels traffic conditions along Highway 79 South, between Pale
Road and Interstate 15, are very dangerous due to lack of infrastructure. He asked the
Council to consider re-arranging some of the projects in Assessment District 159 to
place them on a higher priority level for completion.
Councilmember Parks said another concern is the flooding that happened along
Highway 79 South.
Councilmember Birdsall expressed concerns that the intersection at La Paz and
Highway 79 South is becoming very dangerous and asked if temporary traffic control
devices could be placed at this intersection.
Paul Thompson advised that the District cannot use its funds for temporary measures
of less than five (5) years, however the City could place those temporary
improvements.
Councilmember Birdsall suggested the City and the. County consider a cost share
program to expedite installing traffic signals at dangerous intersections.
Director of Public Works Tim Serlet advised that the City has approached Cal Trans
several times about placing a stop sign at La Paz and Highway 79 South, however the
requests have been denied.
Mayor Mu~oz declared a recess at 7:10 P.M. The meeting was reconvened at 7:30
P.M.
Greg Aguilar distributed an August 30, 1993 Assessment District 161 Status Update
Report and provided an overview of the projects.
Rick Robbins, 40144 Villa Venecia, Temecula, representing the Martinque and
Portofino Tax Inquiry Committee, addressed the Council with concern that the County
CCMIN08131193 -2- 0911 1193
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
AUGUST 31..1993
is not responding to the requests for tax relief from the Martinque and Portofino
property owners. Mr. Robbins told the Council that the committee has continued to
obtain engineering reports, etc., which conclude that the residents of Martinque and
Portofino are paying for improvements which they are not directly benefiting from as
follows:
Flood Control Channel
Widening of Winchester Road
Mr. Robbins said the opinion of the property owners is that they should not have been
placed in the Supplemental Assessment District at all. He said that the County has
refused to respond to their letters or address their complaints.
Paul Thompson stated that the County has allocated $125,000 towards reducing the
tax bill.
Frank Sherkow advised that the County has corresponded with the committee and the
County Supervisor's office has tried to provide answers and responses to the issues.
He said the County is in the process of selecting a firm to perform an audit.
Steve Sander, 40213 Holden Circle, Temecula, said he feels the burden of the
infrastructure construction should be shared by landowners outside the district.
Csaba I(o, I(emper Community Development Company, presented a letter from
President Brian Noreen, expressing concerns about the lack of management and cost
overruns. Mr. Ko stated that the original cost of improvements has doubled and
Kemper Development feels that the increase, based on environmental issues, could
double the assessments. He also said the initial improvements under A.D. 88-12 did
not include loop ramps at I-15 and Winchester Road/Rancho California Road and there
was no talk of the Overland crossing.
Councilmember Parks explained that as the needs .of the community grew, the
Assessment District grew.
Frank Sherkow explained that the landowners had the initial Assessment District
before the County was asked to participate. He said the supplemental is a proposal
at this time and the County has asked all the property owners to come forward and
prioritized the improvements based on their immediate needs.
Mayor Mu~oz asked Mr. Ko if Kemper is opposed to the Supplemental Assessment
District.
Mr. Ko explained that Kemper is not opposed to the Supplemental, however they want
to know how the assessments will be spread for the various improvements.
Clarence Hecklinski, 30056 Milano, Temecula, told the Council that the builder advised
CCMIN08131193 -3- 0911 1193
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
AUGUST 31. 1993
the property owners they were not in the flood plan, however the FEMA maps still
show the properties in the flood plain. He said there is very little that AD 161 offers
to the Martinque and Portofino property owners. Mr. Hecklinski said he feels that the
Assessment should be reduced to the cost of the acquisition.
Bill Reed, 40232 Donomore, Temecula, said he feels that the Martinque and Portofino
property owners get no special benefit from Highway 79 North and the cost of
improvements should be allocated to all property owners in the city.
The overall consensus of the Council was to make the improvements of Highway 79
North to Auld Road the highest priority as well as the intersection of Winchester and
Nicolas Roads.
CITY MANAGER REPORT
None
CITY ATTORNEY REPORT
None
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Councilmember Stone, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Roberts to adjourn at
9:30 P.M. The motion was unanimously carried.
The next meeting of the Temecula City Council will be held on Tuesday, September 7, 1993,
Workshop on Council Norms, 6:00 PM, Main Conference Room, Temecula City Hall, 43174
Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
The next regular meeting of the Temecula City Council will be held on Tuesday, September
14, 1993, 7:00 PM, Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California.
ATTEST:
Mayor J. Sal Mu~oz
City Clerk June S. Greek
CCMIN08131193
-4- 0911 1193
ITEM NO.
3
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF THE ~ COUNCIL OF ~ CITY OF
TE.MECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS
SET FORTH IN Ex-msrr A
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE,
DETI~.MINE AND ORDER AS FOTJ-OWS:
Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A have been
audited by the City Manager, and that the same are hereby allowed in the mount of
$960,903.51
Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOFrED, this 28th day of September, 1993.
ATTEST:
J. Sal Mu~oz, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
Reso$ 333 I
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OP RIVERSIDE) SS
crrY OF TEM CULA)
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby-do certify that the
foregoing Resolution No. 93- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the
City of Temecula on the 28th day of September 1993 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: 0
NOE: 0
ABSENT: 0
COUNCH.,M~MB~: None
COUNCILMP~MBERS: None
COUNCK.MEMBERS: None
June S. Greek, City Clerk
Ruos 333
CITY OF TEMECULA
LIST OF DEMANDS
09109/93 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
09/18/93 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
09128/93 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
09/09/93 TOTAL PAYROLL:
$124,074.69
$196,020.52
$535,088.74
$105,719.56
TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 05/28/93 COUNCIL MEETING:
DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND:
CHECKS:
001 GENERAL $165,972.71
100 GAS TAX $55,409.54
190 TCSD $41,222.72
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A $6,295.65
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B $3,477.04
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C $15,519.71
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ (CIP) $65,988.00
250 TCSD4::IP $415,610.00
280 RDA-CIP $46,550.58
/.---t00 SELF-INSURANCE $1,548.77
0 VEHICLES $139.56
320 INFORMATIONS SYSTEMS $13,513.98
330 COPY CENTER $3,531.82
340 FACILITIES $404.37
PAYROLL:
001 GENERAL (PAYROLL) $68,053.09
100 GAS TAX (PAYROLL) $14,390.33
190 TCSD (PAYROLL) $17,990.01
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A (PAYROLL) $414.90
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C (PAYROLL) $1,692.62
300 SELF-INSURANCE (PAYROLL) $533.80
320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS (PAYROLL) $1,206.26
330 COPY CENTER (PAYROLL) $1,458.55
$960,903.51
$855,163.95
$105,719.56
TOTAL BY FUND: $960,903.51
PREPARED BY KARMA MCINTYRE
~///4/t4/'~, ~ ~ %~ tj BY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING
I'MARY J~NE ~/~, FINANCE O='~~~
, A -
IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
VOUCHRE2
09/09193
15:19
CiTY OF TENECULA
VOUCNER/CHECI~ REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGg-.~ ,
FUND
001
100
190
191
193
280
300
310
320
:330
3,/,0
TITLE
GENERAL FUND
GAS TAX FUND
COtl4UNITY SERVICES DiSTRiCT
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
TCSD SERV]CE LEVEL C
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
iNSURANCE FUND
VEHICLES FUND
INFORNAT[UN SYSTENS
COPY CENTER FUND
FACILITIES
TOTAL
AI~T
68,658.67
16,517.56
26,396.68
6,765.31
1,756.39
200.00
1,568.77
41.98
1,757.43
2,5:3~.81
124,074.69
VOUCHRE2
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NLINBER
11731
11821
227~46
227l~6
227~46
227446
227~6
227~46
227~46
227446
227446
.227~,6
227~46
227~46
227446
227/~6
2274~,6
294379
294379
294379
294379
294379
294379
294379
294379
294379
294379
294379
294379
294379
11825
11826
11827
11828
11829
11830
15:19
CHECK
DATE
09/02/93
09/02/93
09109193
09109193
09109193
09/09/93
09/09/93
09/09/93
09/09/93
09/09/93
09/09/93
09/09/93
09/09/93
09/09/93
09/09/93
09/09/93
09/09/93
09/09/93
09/09/93
09/09/93
09/09/93
09/09/93
09/09/93
09/09/93
09/09/93
09/09/93
09/09/93
09/09/93
09/09/93
09/09/93
09/09/93
09/09/93
09/09/93
09/09/93
09/09/93
09/09/93
09/09/93
09/09/93
09/09/93
09/09/93
09/09/93
VENOOR
MUNBER
000588
000~53
000283
00028~
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
VENDOR
NAME
CCAPA CONFERENCE
POSTMASTER
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
F/RSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (/RS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
F/RSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FiRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
BULLARD~ LINDA
JONES, GARY
LANCASTER, JAMES
DEAN, LARRY
CARRILLO, VICTOR
ATTEBERY, SCOTT
SMITH, GARY
CITY OF TENECtJLA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
APA CONFERENCE OCT 3-6T
POSTAGE FOR EHPLOYRENT
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000?.83 FEDERAL
000285 FEDERAL
000283 NED I CARE
O00~J3 NED I CARE
000283 NED I CARE
000283 NED I CARE
000283 NED I CARE
OD0283 NED ] CARE
000283 NED I CARE
000283 NED 1 CARE
000/~ SDI
000~ SO l
00064~ SD l
000/~4 SO I
000/~4 SD I
0004~ SDI
000~ SOl
000444 SDI
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
00044~ STATE
000/,44 STATE
0002~4 STATE
O004~r~ STATE
O00z~4 STATE
000444 STATE
**CLAIM NO. 75-BULLARD,
JONES/REFUND GOLF
LANCASTER/REFUND GOLF
DEAN/REFUND GOLF
CARRILLO/REFUND GOLF
ATTEBERY/REFUND GOLF
SMITH/REFUND GOLF
ACCOUNT
NUliER
001 - 161 - 999- 5258
280-199-999-526~
001-2070
100-2070
190-2070
191-2070
193-2070
300-2070
320-2070
330-2070
001-2070
100-2070
190-2070
191-2070
193-2070
320-2070
330- 2070
001-2070
100-2070
190-2070
191-2070
193-2070
300-2070
320-2070
330-2070
001-2070
100-2070
190-2070
191-2070
193-2070
300-2070
320-2070
330-2070
300-199-999-5207
001-2172
001-2172
001-2172
001-2172
001-2172
001-2172
ITEM
AIqOUNT
580. O0
200.00
10,380.85
2,329.73
2,269.54
76.16
239.25
84.50
247.11
80.57
2,413.67
517.07
626,40
15.21
59.01
19.24
45.02
46,28
651.08
133.45
222.25
6.82
26.45
8.62
20.18
20.73
2,577.10
555.45
473.35
19.05
46o9~
26.81
56.45
12.78
175.00
100.00
100.00
50.00
50.00
50.00
50.00
PAGE 1
CHECK
AN(XJNT
580.00
200. O0
19,449.63
4,857.53
175.00
100.00
100.00
50.00
50.00
50.00
50.00
VOUCHRE2
09109193
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
11832
11833
11833
11833
11833
11833
11833
11833
11833
11834
11836
11834
11835
11835
11835
11835
11836
11836
11836
11836
11836
11836
11837
11837
11837
11838
11839
11839
11839
11839
11840
118~1
11841
11842
11842
11842
1184.2
11842
1184,2
11842
15:19
CHECK
DATE
09109193
09/09/93
09109193
09109193
09/09/93
09109/93
09109193
09/09/93
09/09/93
09/09/93
09/09/93
09/09/93
09/09193
09109193
09/09/93
09/09/93
09/09/93
09/09/93
09/09/93
09/09/93
09/09/93
09/09/93
09/09/93
09/09/93
09/09/93
09/09/93
09/09/93
09/09/93
09/09/93
09/09/93
09/09/93
09/09/93
09/09/93
09/09/93
09/09/93
09/09/93
09/09/93
09/09/93
09109193
VENDOR
NUMSER
000116
000116
000116
000116
000116
000116
000116
000116
000127
000127
000127
000131
000131
000131
000131
000140
000140
000140
000140
000140
000140
000156
000156
000156
000175
000177
000177
000177
000177
000184
000186
000186
000194
000194
000194
000194
000194
000194
000194
CITY OF TL=NECIJLA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIllOS
VENDOR ITEH ACCOUNT ITEH
NAME DESCRIPTION NtJNBER ANOtJNT
BLUNDELL, DENNIS
FOUNDATION HEALTH COl!IN)
FOUNDATION HEALTH CORPO
FOUNDATION HEALTH CORPO
FOUNDATION HEALTH CCIRPO
FOUNDAT]OR HEALTH CORPO
FOUNDATION HEALTH CORPO
FOUNDAT]OR HEALTH CORPO
FOUNDATIOR HEALTH CORPO
CALIFORNIAN - LEGAL
CALIFORNIAN - LEGAL
CALIFORNIAN - LEGAL
CARL BARREN & CO.
CARL BARREN & CO.
CARL BARREN & CO.
CARL BARREN & CO.
COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN
COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN
COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN
COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN
COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN
COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN
DENTICARE OF CALIFORNIA
DENTICARE OF CALIFORNIA
DENTICARE OF CALIFORNIA
GFOA
GLENNIES OFFICE PROOUCT
GLENN/ES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GTE
HANKS HARDBARE
HANKS HARDBARE
BLUNDELL/REFUND GOLF 001-2172
INSURANCE PREMIUM/SEPT
INSURANCE PREMIUM/SEPT
INSURANCE PREMIUM/SEPT
INSURANCE PREMIUM/SEPT
INSURANCE PREMIUM/SEPT
INSURANCE PRENIUMISEPT
INSURANCE PREMIUNISEPT
INSURANCE PREMIUM/SEPT
001-2310
100-2310
190-2310
191-Z$10
193-2310
300-2310
3'~J)-2310
001-1180
JUNE ADS
JUNE ADS
JUNE ADS
**CLAIM 75 BULLAND, LIN
"CLAIM 64 RIHA, PHILL]
**CLAIM 42 COLEMAN, RON
**CLAIM 61STEBART, MAR
001-120-999-5256
190-180-999-5228
001-161-999-5256
INSURANCE PREMIUN/SEPT
INSURANCE PREMIUM/SEPT
INSURANCE PREMIUN/SEPT
INSURANCE PREMIUM/SEPT
INSURANCE PREMIUM/SEPT
INSURANCE PREMIUM/SEPT
300-199-999-5205
300-199-999-5205
300-199-999-5205
300-199-999-5205
001-2330
100-2330
190-2330
191-2330
193-2330
330-2330
INSURANCE PREMIUM/SEPT
INSURANCE PRENILN/SEPT
INSURANCE PREMIUM/SEPT
001-2..~0
100-2340
001-150-999-5250
ELECTED OFFICLAS OD TO 001-140-.999-5228
OFFICE SUPPLIES
NlSC. OFF/CE SUPPLIES;
NlSC. OFFICE SUPPLIES
OPEN PO FOR SUPPLIES
909-695-1260
001-120-999-5220
001-140-999-5220
001-140-999-5220
001-161-999-5220
320-199-999-5208
MISC. NAINT. SUPPLIES 100-164-999-5218
NlSC. SHALL TOOLS & EQU 340-199-999-5242
ICNA RETIREMENT 00019~ DEF CONP 001-2080
ICK~ RETIREMENT 00019~ DEF COMP 100-2080
ICNA RETIREMENT 000194 DEF CORP 1~)-2080
ICHA RETIREMENT O001~W, DEF COle 191-2080
ICHA RETIREMENT 00019/, DEF CONP 193-2080
ICHA RETIREMENT 000194 DEF CONP 300-2080
ICHA RETIREMENT 00019~ DEF CONP 330-2080
100.00
399.09
143.07
97.15
4.14
5.06
3.94
31.50
24.93
205.21
317.50
61.95
134.50
29~.88
2~5.25
218.38
130.75
9.75
132.00
11.48
14.02
45.00
29.86
14.93
15.00
14.00
53.36
25.47
109.01
31.44
199.40
255.17
38.05
2,279.81
564.16
4~6.~6
3~.08
41.66
25.36
50.00
PA.G~
CHECK
AMOUNT
100.00
58~
945.01
3~3.00
59.79
14.00
217.28
199.40
293.22
3,492 '~".
VOUCHRE2
09/""~ 15:19
CITY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR
NUIIER DATE NUliER
VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM
NAME DESCR/PT/OR NUMBER AMOUNT
CHECK
ANOUNT
118z,3 09/09/93 000206
118~3 09/09/93 O0020&
118~4 0910919~ 000214
KINKO'S COPIES
KINKO'S COPIES
LUNCH & STUFF CATERING
H]SC. PRINTING SERVICES 3"j0-199-999-5220
NZSC. PRINTING SERVICES 330-199-999-5220
OPEN P.O. CC DIMMERS 001-100-999-5260
17.67
21
80.00
39.11
80.00
11845 09/09/93 000224 MELAD & ASSOCIATES PLAN CHECK
001-162-999-52~8
180.00
180.00
11846 09/09/93 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR.PREM PREMIUM FOR SEPT
11846 09/09/93 000245 PEAS (HEALTH ]N~JR.PREM PREM]IJH FOR SEPT
11846 09/0~/93 000245 PEAS (HEALTH INSUR.PREH PREM/IJM FOR SEPT
11846 0~/09/93 000245 PEAS (HEALTH INSUR.PREM PREMIUM FOR SEPT
11846 09/09/93 000245 PEAS (HEALTH ]NSUR.PREN PRENItll FOR SEPT
11846 09/0g/93 000245 PEAS (HEALTH ]NSUR.PREN PREMIUM FOR SEPT
11846 09/09/93 000245 PEAS (HEALTH INSUR.PREM PREMIUM FOR SEPT
118~6 09/09/93 000245 PEAS (HEALTH INSUR.PREM PREMIUM FOR SEPT
001-2090
100-2090
190-2090
191-2090
193-2090
300-2090
330-2090
001 - 150-999-5250
13,814.0~
3,518.32
3,285.98
135.95
~69.1'~
143.88
725.0~
100.95
22,193.90
11847 09/09/93 0002~6 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREN 0002/,6 PER REDE
11847 09/09/93 000246 PEAS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 0002/,6 PER REDE
11847 09/09/93 000246 PEAS EMPLOYEES' RETIREH 000246 PEAS RET
118/,7 09/09/93 000246 PEAS EMPLOYEES' RETZREM 0002/,6 PEAS RET
118/,7 09/09/93 0002/,6 PEAS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 0002/,6 PEAS RET
1.:},eJ-709/09/93 000246 PEAS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 0002~6 PEAS RET
1 09/09/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREN 0002~ PEAS RET
11,,-,r 09/09/93 0002/,6 PEAS EHPLOYEES' RETIREN 000246 PEAS RET
118/,7 09/09/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RET[REM 000246 PEAS RET
11847 09/09/93 000246 PEAS EMPLOYEES' RETIREN 000246 PEAS RET
118~7 09/09/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREH 000246 SURVIVOR
11847 09/09/9] 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 0002/,6 SURVIVOR
11847 09/09/9] 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREH 000246 SURVIVOR
118~7 09/09/9] 000246 PEAS EMPLOYEES' RETIREH 000246 SURVIVOR
118~7 09/09/9] 000246 PEAS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 SURVIVOR
11847 09/09/93 000246 PEAS EMPLOYEES' RETIREH 000246 SURVIVOR
11847 09/09/9] 000246 PEAS .EMPLOYEES~ RET|REH 000246 SURVIVOR
118~7 09/09/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 SURVIVOR
001-2130
100-2130
001-2390
100-2390
190-2390
191-2390
193-2390
300-2390
320-2390
330-2390
001-2390
100-2390
190-2390
191-2390
193-2390
300-2390
320-2390
330-2390.
107.35
107.35
11,399.48
2,271.
1,~86.83
75.77
279.14
94.20
232.35
224.03
59.17
10.68
11.16
1.~
.~6
.93
'1.86
118A8 09/09/9] 000266 RIGHTWAY
RENT OR PORTABLE TOILET 100-164-999-5238
57.39
57.39
118~9 09/09/9] 000291 SPEE DEE OIL CHANGE & T REPAIR & NAINT. CITY VE. 310-162-999-5214
118~9 09/09/9] 000291 SPEE DEE OIL CHANGE & T REPAIR & NAINT. CITY VE ]10-164-999-5214
20.99
20.99
11850 09/09/9] 000294 STATE CONPENSATZOR INS. MORKERS COHP/SEPT 001-2370
11850 09/09/93 000294 STATE COMPENSATION INS. MORKERS CONP/SEPT 100-2370
11850 09/09/9] 000294 STATE COMPENSATION INS. I, IORKERS COMP/SEPT 190-2370
11850 09/09/93 000294 STATE COMPENSATION INS. gORKERS CONP/SEPT 191-2370
11850 09/09/9] 000294 STATE COMPENSATION INS. i40RKERS CONP/SEPT 193-2370
11850 09/09/9] 000294 STATE COMPENSATION INS. k/ORKERS CONP/SEPT 320-2370
11850 09/09/93 000294 STATE COMPENSATION INS. klORKERS COMP/SEPT 330-2370
11850 09/09/9] 000294 STATE COMPENSATION INS. IJORKERS COMP/SEPT 001-1182
9,203.~
3,955.49
4,086.87
428.15
110.53
229.91
332.39
25.35
18,372.15
09/09/93 000302 SYSTEM SOURCE FLAT BRACKETS;PLANNING 3/,0-199-999-5242 25.00
09/09/9] 000302 SYSTEM SOURCE TAX 3Z,0-199-999-5242 1.94 26.94
VCXJCHRE2 CITY OF TENECIJLA
09/09/93 15:19 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOX ALL PERZOOS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOX VENDOX ITEM ACCOUNT
NLIHBER DATE NtIIBER MANE DESCRXPT]OX NLINBER
ITEM
ANOIJNT
CHECK
ANOUNT
11852 0~/0~/93 000308 TEHECULA TOMIE ASSOCIAT JULY RENT/CLEANING 001-100-~-523~
11852 0~/0~/93 000308 TEHECULA TOgNE ASSOCIAT JULY RENT/CLEANING 001-I00-~9-5234
11852 09/09/93 000308 TEMECULA TOMIE ASSOCIAT JULY/AUG 001-100-~-52~
11853 09/09/93 000317 THOXSBOXNE, ALICIA EDUCATIONAL REZMBURSEME 001'150'~'5259
312.00
/*~7.00
711.00
400.00
1,470.00
400.00
11854 O~/09/~J 000320 TOll CENTER STATIONERS MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-16~-~-5220
315.75
315.75
11855 09/0~/~) 000322 UNZGLONE BUTTERF]ELD TR AIRFARE LEAGUE OF CA CI 001-100-~-5258
133.00
133.00
11856 09/09/93 000325 UNITED HAY OF THE INLAN 000325 IN 001-2120
11856 0~/09/93 000325 UNITED HAY OF THE INLAN 000325 IN 1~0-2120
87.00
17.50
104.50
11857 09/09/93 000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE 2 SETS OF UNIFORMS CLEA 100-1~-~-5263
11857 09/09/93 000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE FLOOR HAT SERVICES; CIT 340-1~-~-5250
11858 09/09/93 000)~5 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI XEROX 5100 TONER
11858 09/09/93 000~/,5 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI TAX
:[S0-1~-~-5220 '
330-1~-~-5220
12.50
34.50
775.00
60.07
47.00
835.07
11859 09/09/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 7/26-8/26 191-180-~-52/*0
11859 09/09/93 00037/* SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 7/26-8/26 191-180-~-5319
11859 09/09/93 00037/* SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 7/26-8/26 lf0-180-~-52/*0
11859 09/09/93 000376 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 7/26-8/26 1~0-182-99~-52/*0
11859 09/09/93 000376 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 7/26-8/26
11860 09/09/93 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 909-202-/.770 DD 001-110-~-5208
73.92
3,865.38
3,99/,.73
1,076.65
/,11 .~8
201.31
9,/.22,66
201.31
11861 09/09/93 000389 USCN/PEBSCO, COBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 001-21&0
11861 09/09/93 000389 USCN/PEBSCO, COBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 100-2160
11861 09/09/93 000389 USCN/PEBSCO, COBRA) 000389 PT RETIR 1~)-2160
11862 09/09/93 000398 CALIFORN'IA HUNICIPAL CMTA I)RKSHOP 001-140-~-5261
8.&~
90. O0
5/.1.16
150.00
639.80
150.00
11863 09/09/93 000630 GROUP AHERICA - VOLUNTA INSURANCE PREMIUM/SEPT 001-2510
11863 09/09/93 000630 GROUP AHERICA - VOLUNTA INSURANCE PREMIUM/SEPT 100-2510
11863 09/09/93 000630 GROUP AHERICA - VOLUNTA INSURANCE PREMIUM/SEPT 190-2510
256.70
22.80
89.00
368.50
11864 09/09/93 000431 NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH
1186~ 09/09/93 000631 NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH
11864 09/09/93 000631 NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH
11864. 09/09/93 000431 NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH
11864 09/09/93 000631 NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH
11864 09/09/93 000431 NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH
11866 09/09/93 000431 NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH
11864 09/09/93 000431 NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH
11864 09/09/93 000431 NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH
INSURANCE PREMIUM/SEPT
INSURANCE PREHIUH/SEPT
INSURANCE PREHIUH/SEPT
INSURANCE PREHIIN/SEPT
INSURANCE PREHIUN/SEPT
ZNSURANCE PREMIUM/SEPT
INSURANCE PREM]UH/SEPT
INSURANCE PREMIUM/SEPT
INSURANCE PRENIUH/SEPT
001-2~40
100-2340
190-23/*0
191-2340
1~-2340
300-2..'.~0
330-23~0
001-1180
001-150-9~-5250
605.33
138,11
130.00
7.31
8.94
4.06
32.50
15.00
~0.00
11865 09/09/93 000666 WHITEHEAD, RHONDA
11866 09/09/93 000471 IGOE & COMPANY
TENNIS CLASSES
FLEX PLAN ADHIN/AUG
190-183-~-5330
001-150-~-5250
268.80
255.50
268.80
25,--'-~
VOUCHRE2
09/"'~ 15:19
CiTY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERICOS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME
iTEM ACCOUNT ITEM
DESCRIPTION NLNBER AMOUNT
CHECK
ANOUNT
11867 09/09/93 000673 CALIFORNIA REDEVELOPHEN
11868 09/09/93 000~99 SCCCA
11868 09/09/93 000499 SCCCA
REDEVELOPNENT: CALIF SU 001-160-999-5228
SEMINAR/JUNE GREEK OO1-120-999-5261
SEMINAR OCTOBER 4, 1993 001'140'999'5261
27.68
25.00
25.00
27.~8
50. O0
11869 09/09/93 000521 STEWART, BRUCE M.
STREET ADDRESSING/AUG 001-162-999-5250
360.00
360.00
11870 09/09/93 000565 PAC TEL CELLULAR - S.D. SO 1075255081593 JULY 9 001-160-999-5208
11871 09/09/93 000553 NAGIC NOUNTAIN TICKiT SALES 190-183-999-5350
11872 09/09/93 000557 JOHNSON REPEATER NONTHLY PALONAR BASE, N 320-199-999-5209
75.50
3,270.50
186.00
75.5O
3,270.50
186.00
11873 09/09/93 000558 ADVANCED NOBILCOHN MONTHLY ELSZNORE BASE U 320-199-999-52(}9
11876 09/09/93 000625 VOOS, CHARLES REINB MORK BOOTS 001-162-999-5262
11875 09/09/9] 000642 CITY OF TENECULA - FLEX REIMB FLEX BENEFIT 001-1020
11875 09/09/93 0006~2 CiTY OF TEMECULA - FLEX REINB FLEX BENEFIT 190-1020
11875 09/09/93 0006~2 CiTY OF TEMECULA - FLEX RE]II FLEX BENEFIT 100-1020
11875 09/09/93 000642 CiTY OF TEMECULA- FLEX REING FLEX BENEFIT 330-1020
I 09/09/93 000668 TINNY D. PROOUCTIORS TEEN DANCE 190-183-999-5320
195.30
100.00
3,071.96
516.66
50.00
16.25
250.00
195.30
100.00
3,656.87
250.00
11877 09/09/93 000676 AUTOMOTIVE SPECIALTIES INSTALL TRAILER WIRING 100-164-999-5215
11877 09/09/93 000676 AUTOMOTIVE SPECIALTIES REWIRE SLOt4 LIGHT/TRAIL 100-164-999-5215
77.41
128.93
11878 09/09/93 000726 A & R LUSTON SCREEN PRI BUTTON DOtal JERSEYS 190-183-999-5380
11878 09/09/93 000726 A & R LUSTON SCREEN PRI TAX 190-183-999-5380
11878 09/09/93 000726 A & R LUSTON SCREEN PRI SATIN AWARDS JACKETS 190-183-999-5380
11878 09/09/93 000726 A & R CUSTOM SCREEN PRI TAX 190-183-999-5380
11879 09/09/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA
11879 09/09/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA
11879 09/09/9] 000765 GROUP AMERICA
11879 09/09/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA
11879 09/09/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA
11879 09/09/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA
11879 09/09/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA
11879 09/09/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA
11879 09/09/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA
11879 09/09/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA
11879 09/09/9] 000765 GROUP AMERICA
11879 09/09/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA
11879 09/09/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA
11879 09/09/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA
11879 09/09/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA
11879 09/09/9] 000765 GROUP AMERICA
11879 09/09/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA
l~m'~, 09/09/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA
1: 09/09/9] 000765 GROUP AMERICA
PREMIUM/SEPT
PREMIUM/SEPT
PREMIUM/SEPT
PREMIUM/SEPT
PREMIUM/SEPT
PREMIUM/SEPT
PREMIUM/SEPT
PREMIUM fSEPT
PREMIUM/SEPT
PREM]UM fSEPT
PREMIUMSSEPT
PREMIUMSSEPT
PREM]UMfSEPT
PREMIUM tSEPT
PREMiUM fSEPT
PREMiUM fSEPT
PREMIUM tSEPT
PREMiUM tSEPT
PREMIUMsSEPT
001-2360'
100-2360
190-2360
191 - 2360
193-2360
300-2360
320-2360
330- Z360
001-2380
100-23~0
190-2380
191-2380
193-2380
300-2380
320-2380
330-2380
001-2500
1 O0 - 2500
190 - 2500
264.00
20.46
420.00
32.55
570.OO
109.25
123.50
4.28
16.72
6.75
9.50
19.00
960.70
198.89
185.02
5.89
20.91
7.76
18.67
18.59
203.76
43.32
4O.70
737.01
VOUCHRE2
09/09/9~
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
11879
11879
11879
11879
11879
11880
11881
11882
11883
1188/,
11885
11885
11885
11885
11885
11886
11887
15:19
CHECK
DATE
09109/93
09/09/93
09/09/9~
09/09/9~
09/09/93
09/09/9~
09/09/93
09/09/93
09/09/93
09/09/93
09/09/9~
09/09/93
09109/93
09109/93
09/09/93
09/09/9~
09/09/93
VENDOR
NIMBER
000765
000765
000765
000765
000765
000826
000883
000886
000901
001058
001065
001065
001065
001065
001065
001117
001121
GROUP AMERICA
GROUP AMER I CA
GROUP AMERICA
GROUP AMERICA
GROUP AMERICA
TRAVEL TRUST
HONTELEONE EXC, AVAT[NG
KHALSA, ATNA KAUR
CPRS DISTRICT ELEVEN
ACCURATE LANDSCAPE
USCM/PEBSCO (DEF. roMP.
USCM/PEBSCO (DEF. COI4P.
USCM/PEBSCO (DEF. COlqP.
USCN/PEBSCO (DEF. CONP.
USCIq/PEBSCO (DEF. COIqP.
SANTA BARBARA, CITY OF
CREATIVE VIDEO PRODUCTI
CITY OF TENEOULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
PREHIUI4/~EPT
PREMI IM/SEPT
PREMIUM/SEPT
PREMIUM/SEPT
PREMIUM/SEPT
AIRFARE FOR APA CONFERE
RIVERTON & CALLE GRISTO
YOGA CLASS PAYMENT
REGISTRATION SEPT 28 SE
IRRIGATION REPAIR AT RA
001065 DEF COHP
001065 DEF COMP
001065 DEF CONP
001065 DEF CONP
001065 DEF CONP
CSFHO t~EEKEND TRAINING
PRODUCE PROGRAM VIDEO
ACCOUNT
NUIiER
191-2500
193-2500
300-2500
320-2500
330-2500
001-161-999-5258
100-16~.-999-5402
190-183-999-5330
190-180-999-5258
190-180-999-5212
001-2~0
1OD-2~0
1~-2~0
3~-2~0
320-2~0
001-140-999-5261
1~0-180-~q-5301
ITEM
AMOUNT
1.30
~,.60
1.71
/,.11
296. O0
980.00
172.80
190.00
34~0.1 ~.
3,090.69
222.98
236.32
3 .,~7
312.50
275.00
210.00
CHECK
AMoulrr
2,555.02
296.00
980.00
172.80
190.00
~0.1A
2~
210.00
TOTAL CHECKS
12/,,07~,.69
15:59
CITY OF TENECULA
VOUCNER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERI(X)S
PAGE
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
100 GAS TAX FUle
190 CCN4UNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
192 TCSO SERVICE LEVEL B
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND
280 REDEVELDPMENT AGENCY - CIP
310 VEHICLES FUND
320 INFORHATION SYSTEMS
33o coPY CENTER FUND
7~,0 FACILiTiES
TOTAL
AHOUNT
50,933.11
1,301.85
5,339.78
1,154.62
3,477'.0~.
936 ./,0
85,988.00
65,050.58
97.58
439.57
997.11
30~.88
196,020.52
VOUCHRE2
'09/16/95
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUffiiER
11889
11890
11890
11891
11895
11896
11897
11897
11897
11897
11898
11899
11900
11901
11902
11902
11903
11904
11904
11905
11905
11905
11905
11905
11905
11905
11905
11906
11906
11907
11908
11908
11909
15:59
CHECK
DATE
09/15/95
09/15/93
09/15/93
09/15/93
09/16/93
09/16/93
09/16/93
09/16/93
09/16/93
09/16/93
09/16/95
09/16/93
09/16/93
09/16/93
09/16/93
09/16/93
09/16/93
09/16/93
09/16/93
09/16/93
09/16/93
09/16/93
09/16/93
09/16/93
09/16/93
09/16/93
09/16/93
09/16/93
09/16/93
09/16/93
09/16/93
09/16/93
09/16/93
VENDOR VENDOR
NUMBER NARE
000175 GFOA
000596 LEAGUE OF CA CZTIES/LAF
000596 LEAGUE OF CA CZTIES/LAF
000845 NATIORAL LEAGUE OF CITI
NCX)ICA, ROeERT
PARAGON STEAK HOUSE
STAHL, LUIS
STAHL, LUIS
STAHL, LUIS
STAHL, LUIS
PUTMAN, LES
SMR DRYWALL, INC,
000101 APPLE ONE
000107 ALHAMBRA GROUP
000127 CALIFORNIAN - LEGAL
000127 CALIFORNIAN - LEGAL
000136 CHESHERS' CUSTON EMBRO[
000162 EGGHEAD DISCOUNT SOFTWA
000162 EGGHEAD DISCOUNT SOFTWA
000177
000177
000177
000177
000177
000177
000177
000177
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENN]ES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENN]ES OFFICE PRODUCT
000186 HANKS HARDgARE
000186 HANKS HARDgARE
:
000201 JENNACO
000206 KINKO'S COPIES
000206 KINKO'S COPIES
000214 LUNCH & STUFF CATERING
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTZOR
GFOA BUDGET AI~ARD FEE
OCT 16-19
OCT 16-19
ANNUAL CORGRESS OF CITI
REFUND/GOLF T./NODICA
REFUND/BOND/PARAGON STE
REFOND/STAHL
REFUND/STAHL
REFUND/STAHL
REFUHD/STAHL
REFUND/GOLF T/PUTMAN
REFUND\GOLF T\SMR DRYgA
TEMPORARY SERVICES IN F
REPRODUCTION CHARGES
PUBLIC NOTICES JULY
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARIN
HATS GOLF TOURNAMENT
155671 INTEL NETPORT II
TAX
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
CREDIT:MEMO
MISC. SUPPLIES
RECREATIONAL SUPPLIES
SEPT JANITORIAL CNG,
RDA COPY CHG
PRINTING SERV.
DINNERS
ACCOUNT
NI.NBER
001-1/d)-999-5250
001-110-999-5258
001-100-999-5258
001-100-999-5258
001-2172
001-2650
001-171-4036
001-2210
001-161-410~
001-16~-6388
001-2172
001-2172
001-140-999-5118
100-164-999-52~8
001-120-999-5256
001-161-999-5256
001-2172
320-199-999-5221
320-199-999-5221
190-180-999-5220
001-140-999-5220
001-140-999-5220
001-120-999-5220
001-140-999-5220
001-162-999-5220
001-140-999-5220
001-120-999-5220
190-180-999-5212
190-180-999-5301
190-181-999-5212
280-199-999-5250
330-199-999-5220
001-100-999-5260
ITEM
AMOUNT
200.00
23O.5O
975.00
325.00
200.00
4,250.00
113.00
69.00
274.00
22.00
200.00
100.00
170.10
12.00
190.50
99.12
525.88
383.00
29.69
219.68
12.97
2.52
6.78
32.27
2.86-
23.71 -
68.53-
32.67
188.02
400.00
50.58
32.25
80.00
~ECK
IT
200.00
1,205.50
325.00
200.00
4,250.00
478.00
200.00
100.00
170.10
1,
289.62
525.88
412.69
179.12
220.69
4O0.00
82.8~
VOUCNRE2
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NIJNBER
11910
11911
11912
11912
11913
11913
11913
11913
11913
11913
11913
11916
11914
1'i915
11916
11916
11917
11917
11917
11918
11919
11920
11921
11922
11923
11924
11926
11924
11924
11925
15:59
CHECK VENDOR VENDOR
DATE NUMBER MANE
00116/93
09/16/93
09/16/93
09/16/93
09/16/93
00/16/93
09/16193
00/16/9~
09116193
09116193
09/16/93
09/16/93
09/16/93
09/16/93
09/16/93
09116193
09/16/93
09/16/93
09/16/93
09/16/93
09/16/93
09/16/93
09/16/93
09/16/93
09/16/93
09/16/93
09/16/93
09116193
09/16/93
09/16/93
09/16/93
09/16/93
09/16/93
09/16/93
000219 HARTIN 1-HOUR PHOTO
000233 NELSON, SHAUN
000241 ORANGE SPORTING GC/~S
000241 ORANGE SPORTING GOODS
000249 PETTY CASH
000249 PETTY CASH
000249 PETTY CASH
000249 PETTY CASH
000249 PETTY CASH
000249 PETTY CASH
000249 PETTY CASH
000262 RANCHO WATER
000262 RANCHO HATER
000268 RIV. CO. HABITAT CORSER
000305 TARGET STORE
000305 TARGET STORE
000305 TARGET STORE
000305 TARGET STORE
000305 TARGET STORE
000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE
000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE
000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE
000339 WEST PUBLISHING CONPANY
O003AO WHITE CAP
000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI
000355 R]VERSZDE COUNTY REG]S,
000358 DIXON, DAVID F.
000362 RODRIGUEZ, JOHN
000374
000374
OO0374
000374
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CAL/F EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF ED]SON'
000380 LAIDLAW TRANSIT
000426 RANCHO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL
CITY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIOOS
ITEN
DESCRIPTION
PHOTO DEVELOPING AUTHOR
TUITION REINB.
DEBEER TC12 SOFTBALL
TAX
REIMB.
REIffil.
REINB.
Ellel.
REINB.
REIMB.
REI!el.
01-06-29600-0 7/12-8/10
7/16-8/13
K-HAT AUGUST
561/,60 POLARIOD CANERA
5615/,7 35 HM CANERA
56002, 2 PACK POLARIOD F
TAX
RECREATION SUPPLIES
2 SETS OF UNIFORMS CLEA
UNIFORM RENTAL
CLEANING UNIFORM RENTAL
PUBL]CAT]ONS
1 PAIR SAFETY TOE BOOTS
NETER USAGE; 5100 COPIE
SIGNATURE VERIFICATION
REINB FLEX PLAN
REIHB UORK BOOTS
0~13-00/02/93
07/13-09/02/93
08109-09108193
08109-09108193
BUS TRANSPORTATION TO K
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
ACCOUNT
NUNHER
001-163-999-5250
001 - 150-999-5259
190-18-999-5380
190-18~-999-5380
001-1(:3-999-5260
001-1/,0-999-5260
001 - 110-999-5220
001-162-999-5258
320-199-999-5220
001-163-999-5220
001-140-999-5Z60
190-181-999-5240
1~-180-999-5~0
001 -Z300
100-16~-999-5218
100-164-999-5218
100-164-999-5218
100-164-999-5218
190-180-999-5301
100-164-999-5243
190-180-999-5243
190-180-999-5243
001-120-999-5228
100-164-999-5243
330-1~-~-5239
001-120-999-5250
001-110-999-5113
001-162-999-5242
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
190-18~-999-5340
190-180-999-5212
Z TEN
Ne3JMT
35.97
400.00
711.00
55.10
53.01
~.~
7.~
12.~
26.~
5.~
6.50
9.61
936.60
5,245 · 50
199.98
270.00
37.7'5
11.89
40.05
13.60
13.60
24.26
90.00
964.86
961.60
246.80
52.79
13.26
13.26
225.87
51 .~7
418.00
41.38
PAGE 2
CHECK
ANOLINT
35.97
766.10
135.06
9~6.01
5,245 · 50
599.60
67.25
24.26
90.00
964.86
961.60
2A6.80
52.79
303,86
418,00
41.38
VOUCHRE2
09/16/9'3
VC)UCHER/
CHECK
NIJMBER
11927
11928
11929
11929
11929
11929
11929
11929
11929
11930
11930
11930
11930
11930
11930
11930
11930
11930
11930
11930
11930
11930
11930
11930
11930
11930
11930
11930
11930
11930
11930
11930
11930
11930
11931
11932
11932
11932
11932
11932
11932
11933
1193~
15:59
CHECK
DATE
09/16/9'3
09/16/93
09/16/93
09/16/93
09/16/93
09/16/93
09/16/93
09/16/9'3
09/16/9'3
09/16/9'3
09/16/9'3
09/16/93
09/16/93
09/16/93
09/16/93
09/16/93
09/16/93
09/16/93
09/16/93
09/16/93
09/16/93
09/16/93
09/16/93
09/16/93
09/16/93
09/16/93
09/16/93
09/16/93
09/16/93
09/16/93
09/16/93
09/16/93
09/16/93
09/16/93
09/16/93
09/16/93
09/16/93
09/16/93
09/16/93
09/16/93
09/16/93
09/16/93
09/16/93
VENDOR
NIMBER
OO0~2
000515
000524
000524
000524
000524
000524
000524
000524
000537
000537
000537
000537
00053?
000537
000537
000537
000537
000537
000537
000537
000537
000537
000537
000537
000537
000537
000537
000537
000537
000537
000537
000537
000537
000576
000580
000580
000580
000580
000580
000580
000596
000611
COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS
TEMECIJLA VALLEY CHAMBER
VAN TECH
VAN TECH
VAN TECH
VAN TECH
VAN TECH
VAN TECH
VAN TECH
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED/
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDZ
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI
SOUTHERN CALIFORNZA EDI
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI
SOUTHERN' CALIFORNIA EDI
SOUTHERN CAbIFORNIA EDI
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED/
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIAEDI
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDZ
MESA HONES
PHOTO gORKS
PHOTOVC)RKS
PHOTOVORKS
PHOTO gORKS
PHOTO gORKS
PHOTO gORKS
LEAGUE OF CA CITZES/LAF
CITY OF TENEOULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEN
DESCRIPTION
ALARM MONITORING; CITY
TV CHAMBER/RDA-
XXL LV 115 VEST
XL LV 115 VEST
L LV 115 VEST
XL TS 102 T-SHIRT
L TS 102 T-SNIRT
DIR IMPRINT
TAX
08/01-08/31/9'3
08/01 - 08/31/93
07/311-08/31193
07/31-08/31/93
08/01 - 08/3 1/9'3
07/31/-08/31/9'3
07/31 - 08/31/93
07/31-08/31/9'3
07/31-08/31/9'3
07/31-08/31/9'3
07/31 - 08/31/9'3
07/31-08/31/9'3
07/31-08/31/9'3
08/01-08/31/93
07/31 - 08/31/9'3
07/31-08/31/9'3
07/31-08/31/93
0?/31 - 08/31/93
07/31 - 08/31/93
07/31 - 08/31/93
07/31-08/31/9'3
07/31 - 08/31/93
07/31 /08/31/93
07/31 - 08/31/93
07/31 - 08/31/93
REFUND
FILM/SLIDES
F/LM/SLIDES
FILM/SLIDES
DEVELOPMENT & FILM
CRED/T MEMO
F/LM PROCESSING FOR FIR
OCT 16-19
TEXACO REFINING & MARICE FUEL CM
AC_rOJ_NT
NLtiER
34,0-199-999-5250
280-199-999-5264
100-164.-999-5218
100-164-999-5218
100-164-999-5218
100-164-999-5218
100-164-999-5218
100-164-999-5218
100-164-999-5218
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
191-180-9O9-5319
191-180-9O9-5319
191-180-999-5319
191-180-~-5319
191-180-9O9-5319
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
192-180-999-5319
191-180-9O9-5319
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
191-180-9O9-5319
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
001-2650
190-180-999-5301
190-180-999-5301
190-180-999-5301
190-180-999-5301
190-180-999-5301
001-171-999-5250
001-110-999-5258
001-110-999-5262
ITEH
AI40~T
135.00
45,000.00
32.90
130.05
130.05
39.00
26.00
63.90
30.59
31.~6
38.8O
18.56
15.42
8.76
33.95
38,50
37.42
39.05
38.61
38.85
38.67
33.36
3~.54
36.5O
118.90
30.59
26.9'3
36.89
.29.25
37.02
36.02
28.76
180.00
21.56
15.68
69.83
35.66
50.00-
11.58
205.00
33.55
CHECK
Ale3JNT
135.00
45,000.00
452.49
4,327.80
180.00
104.31
205.00
VOUCHRE2
09/""%3
15:59
CITY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PER]ODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER
ITEM
ANOIJMT
CHECK
ANOUNT
11935
11935
11936
11937
11937
11937
11937
11937
11937
09/16/93
09/16/93
0006~3 FORTNER HARDWARE OPEN PURCHASE ORDER FOR 190-180-999-5212
000643 FORTMER HARDWARE NISC SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5212
09/16/93 000645 SMART & FINAL M[SC ITEMS 190-182-999-5301
09/16/93 000724 A & R OUSTON SCREEN PRI HOODED SWEATSHIRTS (2) 190-183-999-5380
09/16/93 000724 A & R CUSTOM SCREEN PR] HOOOED SgEATSHIRTS XXL 190-183-999-5380
09/16/93 000724 A & R OUSTON SCREEN PRI TAX 190-183-999-5380
09/16/93 000724 A & R LUSTON SCREEN PR] SATIN AWARDS JACKETS 190-183-999-5380
09/16/93 000724 A & R OUSTOR SCREEN PRI XXL SATIN AgARDS JACKET 190-183-999-5380
09/16/93 000724 A & R LUSTON SCREEN PR! TAX 190-183-999-5380
./,6
43.72
214.92
35.82
19.43
420.00
64.00
37.51
908.24
43.72
791.68
11938
11938
11938
11938
11938
11938
09/16/93 000757 CONCISE CONSTRUCTION BUILDING PORTION OF PRO 210-199-801-580~
09/16/93 000757 CONCISE CONSTRUCTION 10% CONTINGENCY OF COlIT 210-199-801-580~
09/16/93 000757 CONCISE CONSTRUCTZOR AgARD FOR EXTRA WORK 210-199-801-5804
09/16/93 000757 CONCISE CONSTRUCTION RETENTION 210-2035
09/16/93 000757 CONCISE CONSTRUCTION CREDIT CARPENTRY 210-199-801-580~
09/16/93 000757 CONCISE CONSTRUCT]ON RETENTION(CREDIT MEMO) 210-2035
11939 09/16/93 000878 BOYS &GIRLS CLUB DRAW ~8 001-1500
1~ 09/16/93 000907 TENECULA CAR WASH WASH PW 310-164-999-5214
09/16/93 000907 TEMECULA CAR WASH WASH PW 310-164-999-5214
1,.~d 09/16/93 000907 TEMECULA CAR WASH FUEL/WASH PW 310-164-999-5214
11940 09/16/93 000907 TEMECULA CAR WASH FUEL/WASH PW 310-16~-999-5214
11940 09/16/93 000907 TEMEOULA CAR ~ASH WASH PW 310-164-999-5214
11940 09/16/93 000907 TEMELULA CAR WASH HASH PW 310-16/,-999-5214
11940 09/16/93 000907 TENECULA CAR WASH WASH PW 310-164-999-5214
11940 09/16/93 000907 TEMELULA CAR WASH WASH PW 310-16~-999-5214
11940 09/16/93 000907 TEMEOULA CAR WASH WASH Pg 310-16~-999-5214
11940 09/16/93 000907 TEMELULA CAR WASH WASH ~ 310-164-999-5214
11940 09/16/93 000907 TEMECULA CAR WASH WASH PW 310-164-999-5214
11940 09/16/93 000907 TEMECULA CAR WASH WASH CITY VAN 310-180-999-5214
41,930.00
48,604.00
9,175.00
9,971.00-
5,000.00-
500.00
3~,86~ .50
4.00
4.00
19.35
9.79
25.14
4.00
4.00
5.50
7.00
4.00
6.80
4.00
85,;L~8.00
3~,864.50
97.58
11941 09/16/93 000933 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT 0 PURCHASE TRAFF]C SIGN S 001-163-999-5228
28.00
28.00
11942 09/16/93 000944 McCAIN TRAFFIC SUPPLY CONTROLLER TESTING FOR 210-165-611-5804
750.00
750.00
11943 09/16/93 000980 COAST IRRIGATION SUPPLY RB-320 PCC W/RE CONNECT 190-180-999-5212
11943 09/16/93 000980 COAST IRRIGATION SUPPLY RB-240.PCC WIRE CONNECT 190-180-999-5212
11943 09/16/93 000980 COASTIRRIGATION SUPPLY TAX 190-180-999-5212
11943 09/16/93 000980 COAST IRRIGATION SUPPLY IRRIGATION SUPPLUIES 190-180-999-5212
212.80
579.45
61.40
25.~8
879.13
11944 09/16/93 000988 SOLANO PRESS BOOKS MASTERING NEPA BOOK 001-161-999-5228
40.04
11945 09/16/93 000993 FREEDON COFFEE, INC. COFFEE SERVXCE; CITY HA 3~0-199-999-5250
11946 09/16/93 001002 FIRST INTERSTATE BANK - 5473666~03910057-SN 190-180-999-5260
11946 09/16/93 001002 FIRST INTERSTATE BANK - 5473666~03910149-TS 001-163-999-5260
09/16/93 001076 WESTERN WASTE RENTAL 190-180-999-5238
54.73
27.80
455.00
82.53
455.00
VOUCHRE2
09/16/93 15:59
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR
NLNBER DATE NUHBER
11968 09/16/9] 001088
119A9 09/16/g3 001103
119~.9 09/16/93 001103
11969 09/16/93 001103
119/,9 09/16/9] 001103
11969 09/16/93 001103
11950 09/16/93 001126
11951 09/16/95 001127
11952 09/16/93 001128
11953 09/16/93 001129
CITY OF TEHECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VENDOR ITEH ACCOUNT ITEH
NAHE DESCRIPTION INNBER ANOUNT
RORY RIECK TRACTOR MORK k'EID ABATENENT CONTRACT
FREEDON NATERIALS
FREEDON NATER]ALS
FREEDON NATERIALS
FREEDON HATERIALS
FREEDON NATERZALS
100 POUND BAGS 60 GRIT
DEPOSIT OR PALLET
FRE l GHT
TAX
CREDIT FOR PALLET & TAX
LAND DESIGN PUBLISHING LANDSCAPE BOOK
SYHPOSILN 9]' URBAN/ENV M3RKSHOP LAND,SPECIES D
VOLUNE SERVICES
DEPOSIT CITY PICNIC
DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S GRA CONFERENCE SEPT 2~
001-162-999-54~0
100-164-999-5218
100-166-999-5218
100-166-999-5218
100-1~-999-5218
100-164.-999-5218
001-161-999-5228
001-161-999-5261
001-150-999-5265
001-110-999-5258
135,00
91.00
10.00
20.00
9.38
10.78-
59.00
60.00
200.00
30.00
CHECK
ANOUMT
135 .oo
119.60
59.00
60.00
200.00
30.00
TOTAL CHECKS
196,020.52
VOUCHRE2
16:A6
CITY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGZSTER
FOR ALL PER[COS
PAGE
FUND TZTLE
001 GENERAL FUND
100 GAS TAX FUND
190 CI)I4HUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
250 CAPZTAL PROJECTS - TCSD
280 REDEVELOPt4ENT AGENCY - CIP
320 ZNFORHATIOR SYSTEHS
TOTAL
ANGIJNT
46,581.13
37,590.13
9,A86.46
375.12
12,828.92
415,610.QQ
1,3OQ.OO
11,316.98
535,088.74
VOUCHRE2
09/16/93
VOUCHER/
CHECK:
NU!IER
11955
11955
11955
11956
11957
11957
11957
11957
11958
11958
11958
11958
11959
11960
11960
11960
11960
11960
11960
11960
11960
11960
11960
11960
11960
11960
11960
11960
11961
11962
1196:3
1196/,
11~&~
11964
11~64
11966
11964
11965
11966
16:666
CHECK
DATE
09128195
09128195
09128195
0912819)
09128193
09/28/95
09128193
0912819)
0912819)
0912819)
09912819)
09/28/93
09/28/93
09/28/93
09/28/93
09/28/9~
09/28/93
09/28/9)
09/28/93
09/28/93
09/28/9)
09/28/9)
09/28/9)
09/28/93
09/28/9)
0912819)
09/28/93
09/28/93
09/28/93
09/28/93
09/28/93
09/28/93
09/28/95
09/28/93
09/28/9)
09/28/93
09/28/93
VENDOR
NUMBER
000106
000106
000106
000164
000178
000178
000178
000178
000226
000226
000226
000226
000271
000285
000285
000285
000285
000285
000285
000285
000285
000285
000285
000285
000285
000285
000285
000285
000332
000357
0006603
000437
000437
000437
0006637
000437
0006637
000459
000712
ALFAX
ALFAX
ALFAX
ESGIL CORPORATION
GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO
GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO
GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO
GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO
MICRO AGE COMPUTER CENT
MICRO AGE COffiatJTER CENT
MICRO AGE COMPUTER CENT
MICRO AGE COMPUTER CENT
ROBERT BEIN, ~ FROST &
SIR SPEEDY
SIR SPEEDY
SIR SPEEDY
SIR SPEEDY
SIR SPEEDY
SIR SPEEDY
SIR SPEEDY
SIR SPEEDY
SIR SPEEDY
SIR SPEEDY
SIR SPEEDY
SIR SPEEDY
SIR SPEEDY
SIR SPEEDY
SIR SPEEDY
VANDORPE CHOU ASSOCIATZ
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANS.
SHAll SCOTT POOL & SPA
NOREL,AND & ASSOCIATES
MORELAND & ASSOCIATES
NOREL,AND & ASSOCIATES
MORELAND & ASSOCIATES
MORELAND & ASSOCIATES
NOSELAND & ASSOCIATES
TUMBLE JUMBLE
FORD, STEVEN J.
CITY OF TEHECOLA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERZOOS
ITEH
DESCRIPTIOR
FOLDING CHAIRS (1180))
FREIGHT
TAX
8/1-8rsl
16- SVGA COLOR HONITOR
TAX
80386SX-33MZ 8SLOT 4~!B
TAX
HB/LETT PACKARD LASERJE
US ROBOTICS 14.6 FAX/NO
TAX
TAX
JULY CHGS,
BUSINESS CARD STOCK; GO
BUSINESS CARD STOCK; GO
BUSINESS CARD STOCK; OO
BUSINESS CARD STOCK; GO
BUSINESS CARD STOCK; GO
BUSINESS CARD STOCK; GO
BUSINESS CARD STOCK; GO
BUSINESS CARD STOCK; GO
BUSINESS CARD STOCK; GO
/,-PART CONTINUOUS FORMS
TAX
500/BUSINESS CARDS; GOL
TAX
BUSINESS LICENSE APPLIC
TAX
AUGUST PLAN CK
SIGNAL & I~.GHTING HAINT
POOL SERVICE & HAINTENA
CITY AUDIT
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
SINGLE AUDIT
CITY AUDIT
REDEVELOIq4ENT AGENCY
SINGLE AUDIT
TUMBLING CLASSES
AUGUST SERVICES
ACCOUNT
IRNBER
190-180-999-5262
190-180-999-5262
190-180-999-5262
001-162-999-52668
320-199-999-5221
320-199-999-5221
320-1970
320-197Q
320-197Q
320-199-999-5221
320-1970
320-199-999-5221
001-166-999-5423
001-100-999-5220
001-110-999-5220
001-150-999-5220
001-160-999-5220
001-161-999-5220
001 - 162-999-5220
001-163-999-5220
001-120-999-5220
190-180-999-5220
001-160-999-5222
001-1660-999-5222
001-130-999-52~6
001-130-999-52666
001-1660-999-5220
001-1660-999-5220
001-162-999-5268
100-2030
190-180-999-5212
001-160-999-52668
280-199-999-52668
001-1660-999-52~8
001-1Q)-999-524.8
280-199-999-524,8
001-160-999-52668
190-18:3-999-5330
250-190-129-5806
ITEN
AMOtJNT
2,230.80
355 .GO
172.89
6,373.97
735.00
56.96
6,692.00
503.13
2,928.00
368.00
226.92
26.97
6, 178.38
~6.58
125.16
69.32
221 .~
207,95
69.32
277.26
69.32
277.22
977,21
73.76
~.00
2,79
156.63
12.16
1,965.19
29,707.63
1,282.00
2U,.60
300.OO
300.00
5,522.35
1,000.00
1,000.00
1,301.60
7,380.00
PAGE 1
,,,..-...~
CHECK
AHOUNT
2,758.69
66,373,97
7,787.09
3,529.89
6, 170.38
2,926.06
1,965.19
29,707.63
1,282,GO
8,7,66.75
1,301.60
VOUCHRE2 PAGE 2
09/""q3 16: ~
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
11967
11967
11968
11968
11969
11969
11970
11970
11970
11970
11971
11971
11972
11973
11973
11974
11974
CHECK
DATE
09/28/93
09/28/93
09/28/93
09/28/93
09/28/93
09/28/93
09/28/93
09/28/93
09/28/93
09/28/93
09/28/~
09/28/9~
09128193
0912819~
09/28/93
09/28193
09128193
09128193
09/28/93
09/28/93
VENDOR
NUMBER
000754
000754
000884
000884
000929
000929
001007
001007
001007
001007
001018
001018
001056
001057
001057
001057
001057
001057
001067
001067
VENDOR
MAlE
ELLIOTT GROUP, THE
ELLIOTT GROUP, THE
LARUE PAINTING
LARUE PAINTING
T.B. PENICK
T.B. PENICK
NELSON PAVING & SEALING
NELSON PAVING & SEALING
NELSON PAVING & SEALING
NELSON PAVING & SEALING
EARTH PRODUCTS RECYCLIH
EARTH PRODUCTS RECYCLIN
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
PRO-SCAPE, INC.
PRO'SCAPE, INC.
PRO'SCAPE, INC.
PRO-SCAPE, INC.
PRO-SCAPE, INC.
NITY-L[TE
NITY-LZTE
CITY OF TEMECIJLA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
PLAN CK SERVICES
PLAN CI( SERV.
GRAFFITI EllOVAL/AUGUS
GEAFFITI REI4OVAL/AUGUST
ACCOUNT
NUHBER
193-180-999-5250
190-180-999-5250
100-166-999-5602
100-166-999-5602
CONSTRUCTION OF THE COM 250-190-129-580~
RETENTION 250-2035
SCOPE OF gORK INVOLVED:
SCOPE OF UORK INVOLVED:
R&r 14' X 7' DEPRESS/ON
SCOPE OF gORK INVOLVED:
100-166-999-5602
100-166-999-5602
100-166-999-5/,02
100-166-999-5602
CREEK CLEANUP 001-166-999-5601
GRINDING & REMOVAL OF T 001-166-999-5401
AUGUST LANDSCAPE
193-180-999-5615
LABOR TO INSTALL 16" PO
MATERIALS FOR SPRINKLER
LABOR FOR INITIAL CLEAN
AUG. CHGS
Ti,/OHONTHS LANDSCAPE HA
191-180-999-5415
191-180-999-5615
193-180-999-5615
191-180-999-5615
193-180-999-5615
RT 3672 FX BEIGE FX LEG 190-180-999-5262
TAX 190-180-999-5262
ITEM
AMOI. JNT
900.00
225.00
1,227.50
85.00
453,589.00
45,359.00'
2,250.00
270. O0
325.00
3,725.00
25,000. O0
650.00-
11,302.26
21.00
16.71
3:56.00
290.&8
3,380.00
261.95
CHECK
A~OUNT
1,125.00
1,312.50
608,250.00
6,570.00
24,350.00
11,302.24
1,001.80
3,6~1.95
TOTAL CHECKS
535,088.76
ITEM
NO.
4-
APPROVAL ~
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
City Manager/City Council
FROM:
Mary Jane McLarney, Finance Officer
DATE:
September 28, 1993
SUBJECT:
Combining Balance Sheets as of June 30, 1993 and the Statement of
Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance, and the
Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Retained Earnings for
the Year Ended June 30, 1993.
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive and file the Combining Balance
Sheets as of June 30, 1993 and the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and
Changes in Fund Balance, and the Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in
Retained Earnings for the Year Ended June 30, 1993.
DISCUSSION: The attached financial statements reflect the unaudited
activity of the City for the year ended June 30, 1993.
Please see the attached financial statements for analytical review of financial activity.
ATTACHMENTS:
Combining Balance Sheet as of June. 30, 1993
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund
Balance for the Year Ended June 30, 1993
Combining Balance Sheet (Proprietary Fund Type) as of June 30,
1993
Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Retained
Earnings for the Year Ended June 30, 1993
~ mmm X~9
~ mm LLImm
0 0 '~
.M_
ITEM
5
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROV/~T.
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
Mary Jane McLarney, Finance Officer
September 28, 1993
Resolution No. 93- to participate in the Alternative Method for
Distribution of Tax Levies and Collections and of Tax Sale Proceeds
Adopted by the County of Riverside
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA MADE PURSUANT TO SECTION 4715 OF THE
REVENUE AND TAXATION CODE OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA AGREEING TO PARTICIPATE IN THE
ALTERNATIVE METHOD FOR DISTRIBUTION OF TAX
LEVIES AND COLLECTIONS AND OF TAX SALE PROCEEDS
ADOPTED BY THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
DISCUSSION: The County of Riverside has approached the City of
Temecula to adopt a plan to amend the method of allocating property taxes. Under
the new method the City would receive 100% of the current year levy when due for
both the City general property tax and the Temecula Community Services District
assessments. This will serve to even out the cash flow and make the annual revenue
estimation process easier. The City will forfeit all penalties and interest the County
receives on the collection of delinquent taxes because the City will effectively collect
the taxes/assessments "on time." This loss will be partially offset by the investment
income earned on the "delinquent" taxes collected.
The City's delinquency rate is 9% on general property taxes of approximately
$900,000. The City is currently only entitled to penalties and interest collected in the
second year of delinquency. The County retains the penalties levied in the first year.
RESOLUTION NO. 95-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY.COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA MADE PURSUANT TO SECTION 4715 OF
~ REVENUE AND TAXATION CODE OF THE STATE
OF CALIFORNIA AGREEING TO PARTICIPATE IN THE
ALTERNATIVE METHOD FOR DISTRIBUTION OF TAX
LEVIES AND COLLECTIONS AND OF TAX SALE
PROCEEDS ADOP1TX} BY THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
WHEREAS, Chapter 3 of Part 8 of Division 1 of the Revenue and
Taxation Code of the State of California (hereinafter the "Revenue and Taxation Code"),
beginning with Section 4701 thereof, authorizes the County of Riverside (hereinafter the
"County") to adopt the alternative method of distribution of tax levies and collections and of tax
sale proceeds (hereinafter the "Alternative Method of Distribution of Taxes") as set forth herein;
and
WHEREAS, the City of Temecula is a public district and taxing agency
for which the County levies and collects taxes but for which the County treasury is not the legal
depositary; and
WHEREAS, Section 4715 of the Revenue and Taxation Code allows a
public district for which the County treasury is not the legal depository to agree, by resolution,
to participate in the Alternative Method of Distribution of Taxes; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Temecula desires to
participate in Alternative Method of Distribution of Taxes;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, FOUND, DETERMINED
AND ORDERED, in regular session assembled on September 28, 1993, that the City Council
of the City of Temecula agrees to particpate in the Alternative Method of Distribution of Taxes
commencing in Fiscal Year 1993-94, which commences July 1, 1993, and requests the Board
of Supervisors of the County of Riverside to approve this Resolution pursuant to Section 4715
of the Revenue and Taxation Code.
5~-esos~332 1
This resolution shall take immediate effect upon its adoption and shall
remain in effect for each fiscal year thereafter unless rescinded-pursuant to the provisions of
Chapter 3, Part 8 of Division 1 of the Revenue and Taxation Code.
ATIEST:
J. Sal Mufioz, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
5Xremi~332 2
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss
CITY OF TE.MECI~A )
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, I-IF. IH~.RY DO CERTIFY that the
foregoing Resolution No. 93-__ was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City
Council of the City of Temecula on the day of , 1993, by the following roll call
vote:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
5\r~sos~332
ITEM NO.
6
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEYER~
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
Mary Jane McLarney, Finance Officer
September 28, 1993
Adoption of Travel Policy
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council approve the attached travel policy.
DISCUSSION: The attached policy incorporates an item discussed by Council to
allow reimbursement for alcoholic beverages purchased in a business setting as
specifically authorized by the City Manager. No other changes have been made.
CITY OF TEMECULA
ADMINISTRATIVF TRAVF!: POI ICY AND PROCFDURF
It is the policy of the City to reimburse City officials and designated City staff for the
expenses of travel related to City business according to the statement of policy and
procedures set forth below.
POLICY
Administrative travel is limited to the following classifications of expenditures for the
benefit of the City in connection with "out-of-City" trips:
A. Authorized Travelers
Except for elected officials, Commissioners, and Council-appointed
employees, attendance at conferences shall be limited to one
representative of the City. The City Manager may authorize the
attendance of additional City employees, if deemed appropriate, if travel
funds are available in the department's operational budget. Any number
of elected officials, Commissioners or Council-appointed employees may
attend conferences provided that funds for such purposes are specifically
provided for, and included within the annual departmental budget. In the
absence of an annual appropriation, such travel must receive
authorization in advance of expenditure by the City Council.
Conference travel for employees shall be limited to department heads,
assistant department heads, division heads or positions of highly
technical or professional nature as designated. In all cases, specific
travel expenses must be justified in the annual departmental budget and
approved by the City Manager. Every effort shall be made to avoid the
simultaneous absence of both the department head and the assistant
department head.
B. Transportation
Use of air, train, taxi, private car or bus shall be selected on the basis of the
least total cost to the City after all expense items are tabulated. Analysis
should be made based upon travel time versus actual salary costs lost by
commuting.
Authorized travel time shall be based on that required by the most appropriate
mode of public transportation.
When the use of private automobile is approved, reimbursement shall be at the
current IRS mileage rate.
When City vehicles are used, a credit card can be obtained for all routine
purchases of gasoline and oil. On the Travel Expense Report, the notation
should state "City Vehicle Used". If any repairs are necessary, they will be
reimbursed upon presentation of the necessary receipts. The use of City
vehicles should be included on the Travel Expense Report at the current mileage
rate allowance and then deducted as an expense paid directly by the City.
When the use of public air carrier transportation is approved, travel for all
personnel shall be in coach class or equivalent service. Private automobile use,
to and from the airport, shall be reimbursed for all miles at the current rate as
stated above. Day parking, as well as taxis to and from the airport, will be
reimbursed only with receipts.
While traveling, the use of rental vehicles should be limited. Courtesy shuttle
service, buses, or limousine service should be utilized between airports and
meeting locations whenever possible. Rental vehicles will be permitted when
alternate transportation would be more expensive or impractical. When rental
vehicles are used, economy vehicles should be utilized or those vehicle sizes
adequate to seat multiple City travelers comfortably.
Lodging
Lodging shall be obtained at the most economical rate available for safe, clean
and quality accommodations. Lavish or oversized accommodations cannot be
justified. Conference headquarter hotels are encouraged, as they reduce the
costs of.other modes of transportation between meetings and conference sites.
Lodging expenses and meals for spouses or other family members are not
reimbursable. Any such additional expenses must be paid for by the City
officer or employee directly, or in advance of scheduling, if the City makes
travel arrangements.
Business-related telephone charges which are added to the lodging bill may be
reimbursed. Reimbursement shall be made for two (2) telephone calls of a
personal nature for each full day of travel, not to exceed ~10.00 per day.
Reimbursement for lodging shall be at the actual cost of lodging for the City
officer or employee only, including related taxes and service charges.
Other Exl~enses
1. Registration:
Actual cost of registration will be reimbursed if paid by the City officer
or employee. To the extent possible, pre-registration should be used and
costs paid directly by the City in.advance.
2. Reimbursement Limit:
A "reimbursement limit" amount of $50 per day for each full day
involved in travel on City business for distances over 45 miles from the
City limits is authorized. A "full day" is defined as travel and training
involving more than five consecutive hours of travel and conference
time. Less than five consecutive hours is defined as a half day; the
"reimbursement limit" amount will then be computed at half rate.
Receipts are required.
"Reimbursement limit" will cover all expenses other than registration,
transportation, and lodging.
A "reimbursement limit" amount of $100 per day is approved for travel
to the following cities: New York; San Francisco; Chicago; and
Washington D.C.
PROCEDURE
A. Travel Authorization: Annual Budget
Business or conference travel requests estimated to exceed $1 O0 shall be
submitted with the department's annual budget request, on the appropriate
travel and training request form. Scheduled business travel Within the state
requiring more than one day, and requests for travel out of state require City
Council authorization for City employees.
B. Forms Required
The Finance Officer shall establish such forms as are necessary and appropriate
to provide accurate records of travel requests and travel expense
reimbursement in accordance with City policy and IRS reporting requirements.
All travel forms must be completed in advance and contain the necessary
signatory authorizations.
No reimbursement will be provided without receipts.
C. Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)
Compensation requirements with respect to time spent in attending lectures,
meeting, training programs or similar activities. during work time shall be
counted as working time only if authorized in advance and in writing by the
City Manager. No such authorization shall be given unless the lecture, meeting,
program or other activity is directly related to improving the employee's ability
to perform his/her current job.
Time spent in attending lectures, meetings, training programs and similar
activities shall not be counted as working time where such attendance is
outside of the employee's regular working hours exceot in situations where the
employee is directed by his/her department head to attend such lecture,
meeting, training program or similar activity. In this case, employees, entitled
to overtime shall be compensated in accordance with the approved Personnel
Rules and Regulations with respect to overtime.
D. Travel Time
Time spent by an employee traveling between the employee's residence and
the regular work place is not work time and shall not be treated as hours
worked.
Where an employee is requested by his/her department head to.travel outside
the City, time spent traveling between the employee's home and assigned
destination shall be treated as time worked only to the extent that it exceeds
the amount of time normally taken by the employee to travel between his/her
residence and regular City work place.
E. Definitions
City when used shall mean the City of Temecula.
Conference Travel shall be defined as travel to attend meetings or conferences
that are primarily for the educational or professional enrichment of the
participant and not to transact specific business of the City, but for which the
City will receive a secondary indirect benefit.
Business Travel shall be defined as travel at which attendance of the participant
is required to conduct specific items of City business.
Elected Official means a member of the City Council.
Commissioner means any person appointed by the City Council to an officially
established advisory board, commission, committee or task force of the City.
City Employee means any person regularly employed by the City on a full-time
basis, elected officials and members of advisory commissions or boards.
Council-Appointed Employee means an employee appointed by and directly
responsible to the City Council.
10.
11.
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
Utilize this form for all transactions involving training and travel requests in
conjunction with approved training.
Utilize this form for all mileage reimbursements in conjunction with City
business.
All mileage will be reimbursed at the current IRS rate.
Prepaid column is for those expenses paid in advance through the City
Purchase Requisition/Purchase Order process.
Cash allowances column is for those monies paid to traveler directly.
Receipts must accompany form if reimbursement is requested.
Forms may necessitate completion before and after travel, depending upon
nature and amount of reimbursements requested.
Authorized signatures must be secured prior to submittal to Finance. If not
secured, forms will not be processed.
Department heads may approve travel expenses and reimbursements up to
$1 O0 without City Manager approval.
Items not reimbursable
Items specifically prohibited include reimbursement for personal items. alcoholic
beverages, except as noted below. non-business related entertainment. meals
included in the registration or air travel fee. and meals in connection with half-
day or one-day training seminars. Expenses incurred by the employee's family
are also prohibited.
It is understood that in certain business settings it is appropriate for the City
Council or Council Members to include alcoholic beverages in expense
reimbursements, with the City Manager's approval.
Submissions of Travel Exoense Reoort.
Travel Expense Reports must be submitted to the Finance Department within
ten (1 O) working days after the trip is concluded.
ITEM
NO.
7
APPROV/~T.
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY · MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
Mary Jane McLarney, Finance Officer
September 28, 1993
Resolution No. 93-_ to Establish Petty Cash Fund for the City of
Temecula
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt e resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ESTABLISHING A "PETI'Y CASH" FUND
DISCUSSION: The City Council established a petty cash fund in 1990 of
$500. Based on the increase in the level of city activity staff is requesting an increase
in the petty cash fund from $500 to $800. All transactions in the fund require
appropriate approvals and are subject to selection in the course of the annual audit.
P,.'WORTONL~4GENDA,~.AGN 09108195
RESOLUTION NO. 9~-__
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING A "PETTY CASH" FUND
WHEREAS, there are numerous occasions when small purchases must be made
for or on behalf of the City; and
WHEREAS, it is appropriate that a petty cash fund be established to provide for
the purchase of these smaller items;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. There is hereby established a renewable petty cash fund to
be maintained in the office of the Finance Officer.
Section 2. The amount of the fund shall be $800.00 and;
Section 3. Vouchers, receipts, or other evidence of payment shah be
required before reimbursement shah be made from said petty cash fund, in such form as shah
be required by the Finance Officer.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 281h day of September 1993.
ATTEST:
J. Sal Mu~oz, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
5\resosX331 I
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, I-1ERERY DO CERTIFY that the
foregoing Resolution No. 93-__ was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City
Council of the City of Temecuh on the day of , 1993, by the following roll call
vote:
AYES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
5XresosX.331 2
ITEM
NO.
8
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
APpPd~V~.~L~
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
D~,/~Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
September 28, 1993
Final Tract Map No. 26861-F
PREPARED BY:
Dennis Armstrong, Assistant Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council APPROVE Final Vesting Tract Map No. 26861 -F subject to the attached
Conditions of Approval.
BACKGROUND:
On May 20, 1991, the City of Temecula Planning Commission approved Vesting Tentative
Tract Map No. 26861. The Vesting Tentative Map was approved by the Temecula City
Council at their meeting of July 2, 1991. The most recent phase, Final Tract Map 26861-3
was approved by the City Council at their meeting of January 12, 1993.
Vesting Final Tract Map No. 26861-F is a proposed 37 unit single family detached
condominium development of approximately 3.27 acres located adjacent to the southerly side
of Highway 79 between Pala Road and Margarita Road. The site is currently vacant, but has
been rough graded. The applicant is Presley of San Diego.
The following fees have been deferred for Vesting Final Tract Map No. 26861-F:
Fire Mitigation Fees Due Prior to Building Permits
Traffic Signal Mitigation Fees Due Prior to Building Permits
See Development Fee Checklist (Attachment No. 1) and Fees and Securities Report
(Attachment No. 6) for additional fee information.
-1 - pwl 3%egenda\report 041393
The following securities issued by The American Insurance Company have been posted for
Vesting Final Tract Map No. 26861-F:
Faithful Labor and Bond
Performance Materials Number
Streets &Drainage $ 65,500.00 $ 33,000.00
Water $ 28,000.00 ~ 14,000.00
Sewer ~ 18,000.00 ~ 9,000.00
Signal Mitigation
Fire Mitigation
5,550.00
4,800.00
111 3301 9510
111 3301 9502
111 3301 9494
111 2722 6725
111 2722 6758
SUMMARY:
Staff recommends that the City Council APPROVE Vesting Final Tract Map No. 26861-F
subject to the attached Conditions of Approval.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Development Fee Checklist
2. Project Location Map
3. Vesting Final Tract Map No. 26861
4. Conditions of Approval
5. TCSD Agreement
6. Fees and Securities Report
-2- pw 13%egenda%report 041393
ATTACHMENT 1
DEVELOPMENT FEE CHECKLIST
-3- pwl 3%egenda~,report 041393
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEVELOPMENT FEE CHECKLIST .
CASE NO. Final Tract MaD No. 26861-F
The following fees were reviewed by Staff relative to their applicability to this project.
Fee
Habitat Conservation Plan (K-Rat)
$19501ac.
Parks and Recreation (Quimby)
See Attachment No. 5
Public Facility
$21S.F. or $10,000 max.
Traffic Signal Mitigation
$1501unit
Fire Mitigation
$400/unit
Condition of ADoroyal
Condition No. 20
Condition No. 21('
Time of Comdiance
Prior To Grading
Permit Issuance
Satisfied
(
Condition No. 47 Satisfied
Condition No. 51
(
Condition No. 12
Deferred to Building
Permit Issuance
Deferred to Building
· Permit Issuance
Area Drainage Fees
Condition No. 68
N/A
Regional Statistical Area (RSA)
N/A N/A
FINDINGS:
Staff finds that the project will not be consistent with the City's General Plan once adopted.
The project is not a part of a specific plan.
-4- pwl 3~agendaVeport 041393
ATTACHMENT 2
LOCATION MAP
-5- pwl 3%agenda%report 041393
RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD
~,,_~TA 7~ HWY. 79
SIT
WOLF VALLEY
LOOP
VICINITY
NO SCALE
MAP
ATTACHMENT 3
COPY OF FINAL MAP
-6- pwl 3~,agenda%report 041393
· -r r~
F- C)
?,~, t~o.
i
ATTACHMENT 4
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
-7- pwl 3%egenda%report 041393
City of Temecula
43172 Business Park Dnve .Temec,~la, California 92390
Ronalcl J. Par~
P~mcia H. ~irclsall
Mayor FTO Tem
I(~rel F. Ljncl,~Tsans
Coun~.mem~
Peg Moore
C~unc~lrn,R"n~:~er
J. Sal Mu~oz
Caunolmerr~e~
David R Dixon
[714169~-1989
FAX 1714169.4-1999
July 11, 1991
Mr. Raymond A. Casey
Presley of San Diego
15010 Avenue oF Science, Suite 200
San Diego, CA 92128
SUBJECT: Final Conditions of Approval
For Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26861
Dear Mr. Casey: .
On July 2, 1991, the City of Temecula Planning Commission approved
Vesting Tentative Trac~ Map No. 26861 subject to the enclosed Conditions
of Approval. Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26861 is a proposal to
develop lu, Z singie family detached condominium units on approximately lu,
acres located on the south side of Highway 79 between Paia Road and
Margarita Road-
This approval is effective until July 2, 1993 unless extended in accordance
with Ordinance L$60, Section 8. L~, Written request for a time extension must
be submitted to the City of Temecula a minimum of 30 days prior to the
expiration date.
if you have any further questions regarding this subject, please contact
the Planning Department at (71u,) 69~-6~00.
Sincerely,
i ar
Case Planner
Gary Thornhill
Planning Director
RA/GT:ks
CC:
Engineering Department
Fire Department
Case File
PLA/~ IN~TH28861\k$
ATTACHMENT ! I
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No, 26861
Project Description: Development of 1~2 sinale
family condominium units on aooroximatelV lu,. 68
acres of tend situated south of Hiahwav-79 between
Pale Road and Mareafire Road,
Assessor~s Parcel No,: 926-01 6-025
Rannino Department
1. The tentative subdivision shall comply with the Sta~e of California Subdivision
'Map Act and to all the requirements of Ordinance ~,60, Schedule A, unless
modified by the conditions listed below. A time extension may be approved.in
accordance with the State Map Act and City Ordinance, upon written req.ue~,
if made 30 days prior to the expiration date.
2. This conditionally approved vesting tentative tract map will expire two years
after the approval date, unless extended as provided by Ordinance u,60. The
expiration date is July Z, 1993,
3. Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid prior to recordation of the final
map ..
Legal access as required by Ordinance 460 shall be provided from the tract
map boundary to a City maintained road,
5. All road easements shall be offered for dedication to the public and shall
continue in force until the governing body accepts or abandons such offers.
All dedicatior~s shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the City
Engineer. Street names shall be subject to approval of the City Engineer.
5. Easements, when required for roadway slopes, drainage facilities, uti|ities,
etc., shall be shown on the final map if they are located within the land
division boundary. All offers of dedication and conveyances shall be'
submitted and recorded as directed by the City Engineer.
7. Subdivision phasing, including any proposed common 'open space area
improvement phasing, if appiicable, shall be subject to Planning Department
approval. Any proposed phasing shall provide for adequate vehicular access
to ail lots in each phase, and shall substantialiy conform to the intent and
purpose of the subdivision approval.
8. Prior to the recordation of the final map, Change of Zone No. 5 shall be
approved by the City Council and shall be effective. Lots created by this tend
division shall be in conformante with the development s~andards of'the zone
ultimately applied to the property.
9. A maintenance district shall be established for maintenance along Highway 79,
the developer/applicant shall'pay for all costs relating to er, ablishment of the
district.
10. A Homeowners Association shall be established for maintenance of Open
Space/Common Area and the developerJapplicant shall pay for all costs
relating to establishment of the Homeowners Association.
11. The applicant shall comply with the environmental health recommendations
outlined in the County Health Department's transmittel dated January 2~,,
1991, a copy of which is at"tached.
12. The applicant shall comply with the fire improvement recommendations outlined
in the County Fire Department~s letter dated March 7, 1991, a copy of which
is attached.
13. All proposed construction shall comply 'with the California Institute of
Technoiogy, PalGroat Observatory Outdoor Lighting Policy, as outlined'in the
Southwest Area Plan.
1 u,. Lots created by this subdivision shall comply with the following:
a. Lots created by this subdivision shall be in conformance with the
development standards of the R-3 (General Residential ) zone.
b. Graded but undeveloped land shatl be maintained in a weed-free
condition and shall be either planted with interim landscaping or
provi'ded with other erosion control measures as approved by the
Director of Building and Safety.
15. The developer shall be responsible for maintenance and upkeep of all s|opes,
landscaGed areas and irrigation systems until such time as those operations
are ~:he ~-esponsibiiities of other parties as approved by the Planning Director.
16. Prior to the issuance of Gi~ADING PERMITS the following conditions shall be
satisfied:
t l) Prior to the issuance of grading permits cletaiied common open space
area landscaping and irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning
Department approval for the phase of development in process. The
plans shall be certified by a landscape architect, and shall provide for
the following:
a. Permanent automatic irrigation systems shal.t be instailed on all
landscaped areas requiring irrigation.
Landscape screening where required shall be designed to be
opaque up .to a minimum height of six (6) feet at maturity·
All utility service areas and enclosures shall be screened fro~.
view with landscaping and decorative barriers or baffle
treatments, as approved by the Planning Director. Utilities shall
be pieced underground.
Parkways shall be landscaped to provide visual screening or a
transition into the primary use area of the site. Landscape
elements shall include earth betruing, ground cover. shrubs and
specimen trees- Front yards. shall be landscaped and street trees
planted.
Wall plans shall be submitted for the project perimeter and along
Highway 79. 'A' Street, and Via Rio Temecula- Wooden fencing
shall not be allowed on the perimeter of the project. All lots with
slopes leading down from the tot shall be provided with gates in
the wall for maintenance access.
Landscaping plans shall incorporate the use of specimen accent
trees at key visual focal points within the project.
Where street trees cannot be planted within right-of-way of
interior streets and project parkways due to insufficient road
right-of-way. they shall be planted outside of the road right-of-
way.
Landscaping plans shall incorporate native and drought tot,rat
plants where appropriate.
All trees shall be minimum double staked. Weaker and/or slow
growing trees shall be steel staked·
if the project is to be phased. prior to the approval of grading
permits. an overall conceptual grading plan shall be submitted to
the Planning Director for approval. The plan shall be used as a
guideline for subsequent detailed grading plans for individual
phases of development and shall include the following:
1. Techniques which will be utilized to prevent erosion and
sedimentat/on during and after the grading process.
?.. Approximate ti~te frames for grading and identification of
areas which may be graded during the higher probability
· rain months of January through March.
3. Preliminary pad and roadway elevations.
u,. Areas of temporary grading outside of a particular phase.
17.
Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the developer shall
provide evidence to the Director of Building and Safety that all
adjacent off-site manufactured slopes have 'recorded slope
easements and that slope maintenance responsibilities have been
assigned as approved by the Director of Building and Safety.
Prior to the issuance of grading permits, a qualified paleontologist shall be
retained by the developer for consultation and comment on the proposed
arading with respect to potential paleontologicai impacts. Should the
~ateontologist find the potential is high for impact to significant resources, a
pre-grade meeting between the paleontologist and the excavation and grading
contractor shall be arranged. When necessary, the paleontologist or
reoresentative shall have the authority to temporarily divert, redlrect or halt
grading activity to allow recovery of fossils.
Prior to the issuance of BUILDING PERMITS the following conditions shall be
satisfied:
a. No building permits shall be issued by the City for any residential
lot/unit within the projec'~ boundary until the developerms successoris'
in-interest provides evidence of compliance with public facility
financing measures- A cash sum of one-hundred dollars {el00) per
lot/unit shall be deposited with the City as mitigation for public library
development-
b. Prior to the submittal of buiidin9 plans to the Department of Building
and Safety an acoustical study shall be performed by an acou~icai
engineer to establish appropriate mitigation measures that shall be
applied to individual dwelling units within the subdivision to reduce
ambient interior noise levels to ~,5 Ldn.
c. All building plans for all new structures shall incorporate, all required
elements from the subdivisionms approved fire protection plan as
approved by the County Fire Marshal.
d. Prior to the issuance of building permits, composite landscaping and
irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning Department approval.
The plans shall address all areas and aspects the tract requiring
landscaping and irrigation to be installed including, but not limited to,
parkway planting, street trees, slope planting, and individual front
yard landscaping.
e. All dwellings to be constructed within this subdivision shail be designed
and constructed with fire retardant t Class A) roofs as approved by the
Fire Marshal·
f. Roof-mounted mechanical equipment shall not be permitted within the
subdivision, however solar equipment or any other energy saving
devices shall be permitted with Pianning Department approval.
g. All street side yard setbacks shall be a minimum of ten { 10) feet.
4
19.
:Z0.
22.
h. All front yards shall be provided with lands~ping and automatic
irrigation, "
Prior'to the issuance of OCCUPANCY PERMITS the following conditions shall
be satis-fled: .....
All landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in accordance with
approved plans prior to the issuance of occupancy pertnits. If seasonal
conditions do not permit planting, interim landscaping and erosion
control measures shall be utilized as approved by the Planning Director
and the Director of Building and Safety.
All landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in ac=ordance with
approved plans and shall be verified by City field inspection.
Not withstanding the preceding conditions, wherever an acoustical
'study is required fop noise attenuation purposes, the heights of all
required wails shall be determined by the acoustical study where
applicable.
Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall comply with the
provisions of Ordinance No. 663 by paying the appropriate fee set forth in
that ordinance. Should Ordinance No. 663 be superseded by the provisions
of a Habitat Conservation Plan prior to the payment of the fee required by
Ordinance No. 663, the applicant shall pay the fee required by the Habitat
Conservation Plan as implemented by County ordinance or resolution.
Prior to recordation of a final map, the subdivider shall submit to the Planning
Director an agre"-ment with the Community Services District which
demonstrates to the satisfaction of the City that the !and divider has satisfied
Quimby Act requirements in accordance with Section 10.35 of Ordinance No.
460. The ~reement shall be approved by the City Council.
The subdivider shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of
Temecula, its aQents, officer, and employees from any claim, action, or
proceeding against the City of Temecula or its agents, officer, or employees
to attach, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the City of Temecula, its
advisory agencies. appeal boards or legislative'body concerning Vesting
Tentative Tract Map No. 26861, which action is brought within the time period
provided for in California Government Code Section 66u,99.37. The City of
Temecula will promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or
proceeding against the City of Temecula and will cooperate fully in the
defense. if the City fails to promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim,
action. or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the subdivider
shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless
the City of Temecula.
Prior to occupancy of Phase One. the construction of the recreation area shall
be completed.
5
~_L$. The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site
property interests, and if he or she should fail to do so, the developer shall
at least 120 days prior to submittal of the final map for approval, enter into
an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Government Code
. .Section 66~,62 at such time as the City acquires the property interests
" required for the improvements- Such agreement shall provide for payment by
the developer of all costs incurred by the City to acquire the off-site property
interests required in connec+~ion with the subdivision. Security of a portion
of these costs shail be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an
appraisal report obtained by the developer, at the developer~s cost. The
appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to commencement of the
appraisal.
25. All utility systems including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer, and cable
TV shall be provided for underground, with easements provided as required,
and designed and constructed in accordance with City Codes and the utility
provider. Telephone, cable TV, and/or security systems shall be pre-wired
in'the residence.
26. All utilities, except electrical tines rated 33kv or greater, shall be inCa!led
underground.
Covenants, Conditions and R estrictionsi R eciprocai Access F_asements:
27. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions {CCSi~'s) shall be reviewed and
approved by the Planning Department prior to final approval of the tract
made. The CCSR~s shall include liability insurance and methods of main .t~.i.ning
th~ open space, recrea~;ion areas, parking areas, private roads, all buildings.
in common open areas, and all interior slopes.
28. No lot or dwelling unit in the development shall be sold unless a corporation,
association, property owner's group, or similar entity has been formed with
the right to asSess all properties individually owned or jointly owned which
have ~ny rights or interest in the use of the common areas and common
facilities in the development, such assessment power to be sufficient to meet
the expenses of such entity, and with authority to control, and the duty to
maintain, all of said mutually available features of the development. Such
entity shall operate under recorded CCF, R's which shall include compulsory
membership of all owners of lots andJor dwelling units and flexibility of
assessments to meet changing costs of maintenance, repairs, and services.
Recorded CCF, R's shall permit enforcement by the City of Provisions required
by the City as Conditions of Approval. The developer shall submit evidence
of compliance with this requirement to, and receive approval of, the City prior
to making any such sale. This condition shall not apply to !and dedicated to
the City for public purposes.
29. Every owner of a dwelling unit or 1or shall own as an appurtenance to such
dwelling unit or lot, either { 1 ) an undivided interest in the common areas and
facilities, or {Z) as share in the corporation, or voting membership in an
association, owning the common areas and facilities.
6
3O.
31.
The front yard landscaping shall be maintained by the Homeowners Association
and shall be identified in the Covenants, Conditions and Res=rictions
(CCZ;Rts).
Maintenance for all exterior walls, landscaped and 0pe.n areas, including
parkways, shall be provided for in the CCS;R's, "
Within forty-eight [L~8) hours of the approval of this projec*~, the
applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashiers check
or money order payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Eight Hundred,
Seventy-Five Dollars {$875.00) which includes the Eight Hundred, Fifty
Dollar {$850.00) fee, in compliance with AB 3158, required by Fish and Game
Code Section 711.~{d){3) plus the Twenty-Five Dollar {$25.00).County
administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination
required under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and lu, Cat. Code of
Regulations 1509~. if within such forty-eight t~8) hour period the
h
applicantJdeveloper has not delivered to the Planning Department the c eck
required above, the approval for the project granted herein shall be void by
reason of failure of condition, Fish and Game Code Section 711. ~( c) .
Enaineerina Deoartment
The following are the ~ngineerin9 Department Conditions of Approval for this
project, and shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All questions
re~_ardin9 the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the Engineering
Department.
It is understood that the Developer correctly shows all existing easements, traveled
ways, and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be
resubmitted for further consideration.
33.
The DevelOper shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act,
and all applicable City Ordinances and Resolutions..
The final map shall be prepared by a licensed !and surveyor or registered
Civil Engineer, subject to all the requirements of the State of California
Subdivision Map Act and Ordinance No. u,60.
PRIOR TO RECORDATION OF THE FINAL MAP:
35. As deemed necessary by the City Engineer or his representat~ive,
developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies:
m
m
San Diego Regional Water Quality;
Rancho California Water District;
Eastern Municipal Water District;
Riverside County Flood Control district;
City of Temecula Fire Bureau;
Planning Department;
Engineering Department;
Riverside County Health Department;
CATV Franchise;
7
the.
37.
CaiTrans; and
Parks and. R ecreation Department.
All road easements and/or s',reet deCtications shall be offered for dedication t'o
the public and shall continue in force until the City a-c:epts or abandons such
offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the
City Engineer.
B, C, D, E, F, and G Streets shall be private streets and shall be improvec~
with )S feet of asphalt concrete pavement including rolied curb, or bonds for
the street improvements may be posted, 5 foot utility easements shall be
dedicated running parallel on both sides. of street, A 5 foot sidewalk shall be
constructed on one side minimum of all private streets.
Dedication shall be made or shown to exist to provide for a 71 foot half street
right-of-way for State Highway Route 79 {3~2' right-of-way).
Construct half street improvements in a 39 foot dedicated right-of-way plus
one 12-foot lane, or bonds for the street improvements may be posted, in
accordance with County Standard No. 111{78'/56~). The improvements for
sl~reet "A" may be phased per the approved phasing pian and as directed by
the C. ity Enginear.
In the event that State Highway 79 is not constructed by Assessment District
~59 prior to issuance of Certificates of Occupancy for Phase One, the
developer shall design and construct a decetermtion lane west of Street "A"
and an acceleration lane east of Street "A~, per CalTrans standards. State
Highway 79 improvements shall be bonded for prior to Final Map.
"A" Street access shall be limited to right turning movements in and right
turning movements out only. There shall be no left turns permitted and no
provision for such movements shall be provided for on Highway 79 South.
Vehicular access shall be restricted on Highway 79 and so noted on the final
map with the exception of approved public road connections as approved by
the City Engineer.
Dedicate a 38 foot minimum easement for public utilities and emergency
vehicles access for all private streets and drives.
Corner property line cut off shall be required per Riverside County Standard
No. 805.
Easements, when required for roadway slopas, landscape easements, drainage
facilities, utilities, etc., shall be shown on the final map if they are located
within the land division boundary. All offers of dedication and conveyances
shall be submitted and recorded as directed by the City Engineer,
A declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CCSR~s) shall be
prepared by the developer and submitted to the Director of Planning, City
Engineer and City AttOrney, The CC~;R's shall be signed and acknowiedgr''~
by all parties having any record title interest in the property to be develope~
shall make the City a party thereto, and shall be enforceable by the City.
The CCSR~s shall be reviewed.3nd approved by the City and recorded. The
CCSR's shall be subjecl; to the following conditions:
The CC~;Rts shall be prepared at the developer's sole cost and expense.
The CC~;R's shall be in the form and content approved by the Director
of Planning, City Engineer and the City Attorney, and shall include
such provisions as are required by this approval and as said officials
deem necessary to protect the interest of the City and its residents.
The CCSRms and Articles of incorporation of the Property Own,tins
Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering
Divisions and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrent
with the final map. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City.
The CC~,Rms shall provide for the effective establishment, operation.
management. use, repair and maintenance of all common areas and
facilities.
The CC~;R's shall provide that the property shall be developed.
operated and maintained so as not to create a public nuisance.
The CCSR's shall provide that if the property is not maintained in the
condition required by the
demand and giving reasonable notice. may enter the property
errorre, at the ownerss sole expense, any maintenance requirede
subject to a lien in favor of the C~ty Y
promptly reimbursed-
i. The declaration shall contain language prohibiting further
subdivision of any lots, whether they are lettered lots or
numbered
ii. All parkways, open areas, and landsc3ping shall be permanently
maintained by homeowner~s association or other means acceptable
to the City. Such proof of this maintenance shall be submitted
to the Planning and Engineering Divisions prior to issuance of
building permits.
iii. P, eciprocal access easements and maintenance agreements
ensuring access to all parcels and joint maintenance of all roads.
drives or parking areas shall be provided by CCSRts'or by deeds
and shall be recorded concurrent with the map or prior to the
issuance of building permit where no map is involved-
x:25861-11.v~x%
50.
Facilities Agreement with the City of Ternecula wh,ch provedes p yment
of the sum of money pe~ residential unit then established by Resolution of the
City.Council, prior to the issuance of any building permits for any individual
lots.
The subdivider shall construct or post security and an agreement shall be
executed guaranteeing the construction of the following public improvements
in conformance with applicable City standards,
a. Street improvements, including, but not limited to: pavement, curb
and gutter, sidewalks, drive approaches, street lights, signing,
striping, and other traffic control devices as appropriate.
b. Storm drain facilities,
c. Landscaping,
d. Sewer and domestic water systems,
e. Undergrounding of existing and proposed utility distribution lines.
The street design and improvement concept of this project shall be coordinated
with adjoining developments-
Street lights shall be provided along streets adjoining the subject site in
accordance with the standards of Ordinance N0. L~61 and as approved by the
City Engineer.
51. Prior to recordation of the final map, the developer shall deposit with the
Engineering Department 'a cash sum as established, per lot, as mitigation
towards traffic signal impat-s, Should the developer choose to defer the time
of payment of traffic signal mitigation fee, he may enter into a written
agreement with the City deferring said payment to the time of issuance of a
building permit.
5l. Street names shall be subject to the approval of the City Engineering
Department-
53. The minimum centerline radii shall be 300' feet or as approved by the City ..
Engineer.
54. All street centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees or as approved by the
City Engineer,
55. Improvement plans shall be based upon a centerline profile extending a
minimum of 300 feet beyond the project boundaries at a grade and alignment
as approv~d by the City Engineer,
56. A minimum centerline street grade shall be 0,50 percent,
10
57. Street improvement plans per City Standards for the private streets or drives
shall be required for review and approval by the City Engineer.
58. The subdivider shall submit four prints of a comprehensive grading plan to
the Enaineering Department. The plan shall comply with the Uniform Building
Code, T:::hapter 70', and as may be additionally provided for in these Conditions
of Approval .- The plan shall be drawn on 2~" x 36" mylar by a Registered Civil
Engineer.
59. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and
submitted at the time of application for grading plan check.
60. The subdivider shall submit four copies of a soils report to the Engineering
Department. The report shall address the soils stability and geological
conditions of the site.
61. A drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer.
All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer.
52. On-site drainage facilities, located outside of road right-of-way, shall be
contained within drainage easements shown on the final map. A note shall be
added to the final map stating "Drainage easements shall be kept free of
buildings and obstructions."
63. A copy of the improvement plans, grading plans and final map, along with
supporting hydrologic and hydraulic calculations should be submitted to the
Riverside County Flood Control District for review.
The subdivider shall ac=ept and properly dispose of all off-site drainaS
flowing onto or through the site. In the event the City Engineer permits th~
use of streets for drainage purposes, the provisions of Article XI of
Ordinance-~No. ~60 will apply.' Shouid the quantities exceed the street
capacity, or use of streets be prohibited for drainage purposes, the
subdivider shall provide adequate facitlties as approved by the Engineering
Department.
65. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface
drainage entering the property from adjacent areas.
66. Prior to final map, the subdivider shall notify the City's CATV Franchises of
the Intent to Develop. Conduit sha|l be installed to CAI'V Standards at time
of street improvements-
67. Developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities
imposed upon the property or project. including that for traffic and public
facility mitigation as required under the EI R/ Negative Declaration for the
project. The Fee to be paid shall be in the amount in effect at the time of
payment of the fee. if an interim or final public facility mitigation fee or.
district has not been finally established by the date on which Developer
requests its building permits for the project or any phase thereof, the
Developer shall execute the Agreement for Payment of Public Facility Fee, a
copy of which has been provided to Developer. Concurrently, with executing
this Agreement, Developer shall post a bond to secure payment of the Pu)~iic
Facility Fee. The amount of the bond shall be $2.00 a square foot, not to
exceed $10,000. Developer unders*kands that said Agreement may require the
payment of fees in excess of those now estimated tassuming benefit to the
project in the amount of such fees}. By execution of this agreement,
Developer will waive any right to protest the provisions of this Condi!;ion, of
this Agreement, the formation of any traffic impact fee district, or the
process, levy, or collection of any traffic mitigation or traffic impact fee for
this Project: provided that Developer is not waiving its right to protest the
reasonableness of any traffic impact fee, and the amount thereof.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS:
68; A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the prevailing
Area Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new development. The
charge is payable to the Flood Control District prior to issuance of permits.
if the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already credited to
this property, no new charge needs to be paid.
69. A permit shall be required from CelTtans for any work within the following
right-of-way:
State HiGhway 79
PRIOR
70.
71.
TO BUILDING PERMIT:
A precise grading plan shall be submitted to 'the Engineering Department for
review and approval. The building pad shall be ca~ified by a registered Civil
Engineer for location and elevation, and the Soil Engineer shall issue a Final
Soils Repor~ addressing comPac+-ion and site conditions-
Developer- shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities
imposed upon the propercy or project, including that for traffic and 'public
facility mitigation as required under the EiR/Negative Declaration for the
project. The Fee to be paid shall be in the amount in effect at the time of
payment of the fee. If an interim or final public facility mitigation fee or
district has not been finally established by. the date on which Developer
reqGests its building permits for the pr0jec~ or any' phase thereof, the
Developer shall execute the AQreement for Payment of Public Facility Fee. a
copy of which has been provid~ci to Developer. Concurrently, with executing
this Agreement, Developer shall post a bond to secure payment of the Public
Facility Fee. The amount of the bond shall be $Z.00 a square foot, not to
exceed $10,000. 'Developer understands that said Agreement may require the
payment of fees in excess of those now estimated |assuming benefit to the
project in the amount of-such fees). By execution of this Agreement,
Developer wilt waive any right to protest the provisions of this Condition, of
this AQreement, the formation of any traffic impact fee distric*~, or the
' procesS, levy, or collection of any traffic mitigation or traffic impact fee for
this Project; l~rovided that Developer is not waiving its right to protest the
reasonableness of any traffic impact fee, and the amount thereof-
~:2586z-~.~L~
12
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY:
73.
C~nstruct all street improvements as conditionado including but not limited t
curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway
and s~eet lights on all interior private and public streets.
Existing city roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all
times with adequate detours during construction.
As haltic emulsion (fog seal) shall be applied not less than 1u, days following
placement of the asphalt surfacing and shall be applied at a rate of 0.05 gallon
per square yard. Asphalt emulsion shal! conform to Section Nos. 37, 39, and
9L~ of the State Standard Specifications-
Transoortation Enalneerino
PRIOR TO RECORDATION:
75. A signing and striping plan shall be designed by a registered Traffic
Engineer, and approved by the City Engineer, for State Route 79 and
Street, and shall be included in the street improvement plans.
76. Prior'to designing any of the above plans, contact Transportation Engineering
for the design criterza.
PRIOR TO ISSUANC-= OF ANY ENCROACHMENT PERMITS:
77. A construction area traffic control plan shall be designed by a registerJ*,~
Traffic Engineer and approved by the City Engineer for any street cios
and detour or other disruption to traffic circulation as required by the
Engineer..
PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF OCCUPANCY PERMITS:
78. All signing and striping shall be installed per the City requirements and the
approved signing and striping plan.
79. A stop sign shall be installed at the following location:
'A" Street at State Hiahwav No. 79
SO. A secondary paved access road shall be constructed with a 28' minimum width
of asphalt concrete pavement within the dedicated right-of-way, in accordance
with Catirene and Riverside County standards, to the intersection of SR 79
and Lime Street or 5R79' and Margarita Road to facilitate left turning
movements on to and from SR79-
81. The developer shall contribute 50 percent (50~3 of the cost for design and
construction of the signal at the intersection of State Route 79 South and Lime
Street minus the assessed traffic signal mitigation fee.
A:26861-~.V'D~
Deaar"tment of Buiidina and Safety
82. Submit appraved Tentative Trac*- Map to the Department of Building and
Safety for addressing and street name review.
83. School fees shall be paid to Temecula Unified School Disl;~ict, prior to permit
issuance-
Bu,. Lighting on site pool area and recreation area shall comply with Mount Palomar
Lighting Ordlnan:e ~655.
85. Submit pool plans to Riverside County Hea|th Department for review prior to
structural plan review by the Department of Building and Safety.
Pool ex:avatlon area Shall be fenced immediately the same day as ex:avation
is complete. All plumbing trenches shall be fenced.
8?. Obtain clearances from Land Use and from Building and Safety Depa.rtments.
88. Provide a geological report at tln~e of submittal for plan review.
GLEN J. NEWMAN
FIRE CHIEF
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
FIRE DEPARTMENT
210 WEST SAN JACINTO AVENUE * PERRIg, CALIFORNIA 92370
(714) 657-3183
MARCH 7, 1991
T0: CI'l~C OF TEI~ECIH~
ATTN: PL,*dqNING/RIC~ AYALA
RE: TRACT 26861
With respect to the conditions of approval for the above referenced land
division, the Fire Department recommends the following fire protection
measures be provided in accordance with Riverside County Ordinances and/or
recognized fire protection standards:
FIRE PROTECTION
Schedule A fire protection approved standard fire hydrants, (6"x4"x2½")
located one at each street intersection and spaced no more than 330 feet
apart in any direction, with no portion of any lot frontage more than 165
feet from a hydrant. Minimum fire flow shall be 1000 GPH for 2 hours
duration at 20 PSI.
Applicant/developer shall furnish one copy of the water system plans
to the Fire Department for review. Plans shall be signed by a registered
civil engineer, containing a Fire Department approval signature block,
and shall conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire
flow. Once plans are signed by the local water company, the originals
shall be presented to the Fire Department for signature.
The required water system, including fire hydrants, shall be installed
and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible
building material being placed on an individual lot.
MITIGATION
Prior to the recordation of the final map, the developer shall deposit with
the City of Temecula, a cash sum of $400.00 per unit as mitigations for
fire protection impacts. Should the developer choose to defer the time of
payment, he/she may enter into a written agreement with the County deferring
said. payment to the time of issuance of the first building permit.
Prior to final inspection of any building, the applicant shall prepare
and submit to the Fire Department for approval, a site plan designating
required fire lanes with appropriate lane painting and/or signs. Parking
will be allowed only on one side of private streets.
~] INDIO OFFICE
79-733 Country Club Drive, Sukt F, lndlo, CA 92201
(619) 342-8886 · FAX (619) 775-2072
PLANNING DIVISION
Cl RIVERSIDE OFFICE
3760 12th Sm~ Ri~de, CA 92501
(714) 275-4777 * FAX (714) 369-7451
41002 Coomy Cen~ D~v~ Suke 225, Ten~cuk CA 92390
(714) 69~5070 · FAX (714) 69~5076
~ ~rinted on recycled ~a~er
TRACT 26861 PAGE 2
Blue-dot reflectors shall be mounted in private streets and driveways
to indicate location of fire hydrants. They shall be mounted in the
middle of the street directly in line with fire hydrants.
All questions regarding the meaning of conditions shall be referred to
the Planning and Engineering staff.
RAYMOND H. REGIS
Chief Fire Department Planner
'~"~'~ I f~, ~<'] .' -~' ," ' ','~
By
Laura Cabral~ Fire Bafety Specialist
LC/tm
MINUTE ACTION OF TEE CITY COUNCIL OF
CITY OF TEVn~CIILA, CALIFORNIA
DATE: July S, 1991 ,
TO:
Gary ThomhiI1
Cky of Tm~'uh Planning Dcparuncnt
1V~-RTING OF: July 2, 1991
AGENDA 1TEd
No.: Imm 10'
SUBJECT:' Vestin2 Tentative TracZ 1Vlap No, 26861
The toodon w~ madc by Coundlmcmber Bh-dsall, seconded by Councilrn~rnbcr Moor:
to approvc stuff rec, ommendadon with the toodillon in th~ condidoru of approval to
r:move "cx-=rior building w-as as wd as" from Condition No. 30 and to add "exmdor
walls" to Condition No. 31.
10.1 " Adopt tam addendure to ~ No. 281 for V~sxing Tentative Tract MaD No.
26361.
10.2
Adopt a r~oIudon ~ndd:d:
RE~OLUrION NO. 91-70
A RF~OLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CiTY OF
~CULA APt'ROVING VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO.
26861 TO DEVEIX)P A 14.68 ACRE pAR(T~r. ~FrO 142 SINGLE FA,M/LY
DETACHED CONDOMINK]I~ ~ LOCATED ALONG ~ SOUTH
SIDE OF ~'rGHWAY 79 BETWEEN' PALA AND MARGAR1TA ROADS
AND Is,~"NOWN AS ASSESSOR'S pARC~:~r- NO. 926-016-925
Th: toodon w~ carde~i by the following yore:
AYES: 4 COUNCrr-MS~BRS:
Birdnil, Moor=, Muaoz, Par~
NOES: 1
COUNCILIaSM3ERS: Lind:rnans
ABSent:' 0 COUNCElvIEM]BBI~S: Non:
STAT~ OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF ~IDE) ss ":
c. zrY OF ~CULA )
I, lun: S. ~ CL.] Ci~.k of me City of Tem~,ala, C~ut~ornia, DO ]:i~.t~=~Y CIKP, TIFY,
under penalty of pe~'ury, the forgoing to bc the o~ncial action taken by the City Council az the
above m~,~n~.
IN WrrN~S ~OF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this ~th day of July, 1991.
[SBAL]
ATTACHMENT 5
TCSD AGREEMENT
-8- pwl 3%agendat, report 041393
City of Temecula
43174 13uszness Park Dnve · Ternecula. California 92590
Ronaid .L parits
Mayor
pattlcla H. Birdsall
Mayor Pn:) Tam
Karel F. Uncleroans
CouncjlmernDe~
Counalmeml:~
J. Sal Mufioz
COunalmernDe'
David F. [31x~n
Ci~ Maria9er
(7141 694-1989
FAX (714) b94-,1999
September 30, 1991
Ray Casey
Presley of San Diego
15090 Avenue of Science, Suite 201
San Diego, CA 92128
RE:
TRACT MAP NO. 23267 AND 26861 CLEARANCE AS TO PARK
LAND DEDICATION AND/OR IN LIEU FEES,
Dear Mr. Casey:
TCSD Staff has reviewed the conditions as set forth in the County of
Riverside/CitY of Temecula Conditions of Approval and recommend that
the City Council APPROVE Tract No, 23267 and 26861 subject to the
developer or his assignee entering into an agreement with the Temecula
CommunitY Services. District to conform to the following:
1. Neighborhood Park "A" which consists of a One acre park located
within Sub Tract No. 23267-4 shall be' developed to TCSD
standards and the attached conceptual design prior to the
issuance of the 50th building permit.
2. Neighborhood Park. "B" located witl~in Sub Tract No. 23267-2
consists of an approximate 2.9 acre reservoir which the developer
has'agreed to drain and level to be contiguous with the remaining
6.3 acres of proposed park land to meet his current Quimby-
Requirement and to allow for a total land dedication within this
tract of approximately 9.2 acres. The total 9.2 acres shall be
developed to TCSD standards and the at'cached conceptual design
prior to issuance of. the 50th building permit for Tracts No.
23267-1,2, and 3.
3. To date: all known interior slope areas are hereby conditioned to
be maintained by an established Home Owners Association (HOA)-
Exterior slopes bordering an arterial street may be dedicated to the
TCSD for maintenance following compliance to TCSD standards an
completion of the application process.
Should you have further questions my telephone number is {714) 694-
6480.
Applicant or his assignee agrees to the aforementioned conditions as
signified below. -
Applica t DaTe
Yours tTuly,
CITY F TE .
., es Administrator
C
./
ATTACHMENT 6
FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT
-9- pw 13%egende%report 041393
CITY OF TEMECULA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT
TRACT MAP NO. 96861-F
DATE: September 9~. 1993
IMPROVEMENTS
Streets and Drainage
Water
Sewer
TOTAL
FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE
SECURITY
$ 65,500.00
$ 28,000.00
$ 18,000.00
$ 111,500.00
MATERIAL & LABOR
SECURITY
$ 33,000.00
$ 14,000.00
$ 9,000.00
$ 56,000.00
*Maintenance Retention
11.500.00
Monument Security
0.00
DEVELOPMENT FEES
City Traffic Signing and Striping Costs
RCFCD Drainage Fee Due
Fire Mitigation Fee
Signalization Mitigation Fee - SMD # $
Road and Bridge Benefit Fee
Other Developer Fees
$ 0.00
$ 0.00
$ 14.800.00
$ 5,550.00
$ 0.00
$ 0.00
SERVICE FEES
Planning Fee
Comprehensive Transportation Plan
Plan Check Fee Due
Inspection Fee Due
Monument Inspection Fee
109.00
8.00
5,493.75
4.673.75
250.00
Total Fees Due
Total Fees Paid To Date
Balance Of Fees Due
$ 10,527,50
$ 10.577.50
$ 0.00
*10% Of The Total Faithful Performance Security To Be Retained For One Year
From The Acceptance Date Of The Improvements By The City.
-10- pwl 3%ageride%report 041393
.ITEM
NO.
9
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
APPROv
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
/fi2~Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
September 28, 1993
Final Tract Map No. 23125-1
PREPARED BY: Dennis Armstrong, Assistant Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council APPROVE Final Vesting Tract Map No. 23125-1 subject to the attached
Conditions of Approval.
BACKGROUND:
On September 14, 1988, the Riverside County Planning Commission approved Vesting
Tentative Tract Map No. 23125 Amended No. 2 and Change of Zone No. 5122. Approval by
the Riverside County Board of Supervisors followed on October 25, 1988.
Since that time, the area encompassed by the Vesting Map has been incorporated into the
City, and the map has been granted. three Extensions of Time. The most recent Extension of
Time was approved by the Planning Director on February 11, 1993. Vesting Tentative Tract
Map No. 23125 Amended No. 2 expires October 20, 1993, and is no longer eligible for further
extensions.
Vesting Final Tract Map 23125-1 is a proposed 44 lot single family detached housing
development of approximately 19.1 acres located adjacent to the easterly side of Butterfield
Stage Road and the northerly side of De Portola Road. The site is currently vacant. The
applicant is The Toman Company.
Improvement plans for grading, streets, storm drain; sewer and water have been approved by
the County of Riverside and found to be acceptable by Staff. Improvements will be inspected
by the City.
-1 - pw 13%ageride%report 041393
The following fees have been deferred for Vesting Final Tract Map No. 23125-1:
Fire Mitigation Fees Due Prior to Building Permits
Traffic Signal Mitigation Fees Due Prior to Building Permits
See Development Fee Checklist (Attachment No. 1) and Fees and Securities Report
(Attachment No. 6) for additional fee information.
The following securities issued by INSCO, DICO have been posted for Vesting Final Tract Map
No. 23125-1:
Faithful Labor and
Performance Materials
Streets &Drainage $ 451,500.00
Water $ 91,000.00
Sewer ~ 96,500.00
Monumentation $ 4,212.00
Signal Mitigation ~ 6,300.00
Fire Mitigation $ 16,800.00
226,000.00
45,500.00
48,500.00
SUMMARY:
Staff recommends that the City Council APPROVE Vesting Final Tract Map No. 23125-1
subject to the attached Conditions of Approval.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Development Fee Checklist
2. Vesting Final Tract Map No. 23125-1 and Vicinity Map
3. Conditions of Approval
4. TCSD Agreement
5. Fees and Securities Report
-2- pw13~.agenda~.report 041393
ATTACHMENT 1
DEVELOPMENT FEE CHECKLIST
-3- pwl 3~,agenda'~report 041393
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEVELOPMENT FEE CHECKLIST
CASE NO. Final Tract MaD No. 231 ~5-1
The following fees were reviewed by Staff relative to their applicability to this project.
Fee
Habitat Conservation Plan (K-Rat)
$1950/ac.
Parks and Recreation (Quimby)
See Attachment No. 5
Public Facility
$21S.F. or $10,000 max.
Traffic Signal Mitigation
$1501unit
Fire Mitigation
$400/unit
Area Drainage Fees
Library Mitigation
$1001unit
Regional Statistical Area (RSA)
FINDINGS:
Condition of ApPrOVal
Condition No. 1
2nd Extension
Condition No. 47
3rd Extension
Condition No. 40
3rd Extension
Condition No. 9
Condition No. 15
Time of Comdiance
Prior To Grading
Permit Issuance
Prior to 63rd
Building Permit
Prior To Building
Permit Issuance
Deferred to Building
Permit Issuance
Deferred to Building
Permit Issuance
Condition No. 20 ~ N/A
3rd Extension
Condition No. 3
2nd Extension
Prior To Building
Permit Issuance
N/A N/A
Staff finds that the project will be consistent with the City's General Plan once adopted.
The project is not a part of a specific plan.
-4- pwl 3%ageride%report 041393
ATTACHMENT 2
COPY OF VICINITY MAP AND FINAL MAP
-6- pwl 3'tagenda%report 041393
TRACT NO. 23125-1
ATTACHMENT 3
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
-7- pwl 3\agenda\report 041393
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23125, Third
Extension of Time.
Project Description: Third one-year extension of
time for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23125,
a subdivision of 88.4 acres into 212 single famity
residential lots and 13 open space lots.
Assessor's Parcel No.: 926-070-020,
926-330-004
Approval Date: February 11, 1993
Expiration Date: October 20, 1993
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS:
The tentative subdivision shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act
and to all the requirements of Ordinance 460, unless modified by the conditions listed
below.
e
The subdivider shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Temecula, it
agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City
of Temecula, its advisory agencies, appeal boards or legislative body concerning
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23125, Third Extension of Time which action is
brought within the time period provided for in California Government Code Section
66499.37. The City of Temecula will promptly notify the subdivider of any such
claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula and will cooperate fully in
the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim,
action, or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the subdivider shall not,
thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City of Temecula.
3. Subdivision phasing shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Director.
Tentative Tract Map No. 23125, Third Extension of Time shall comply with all previous
Conditions of Approval for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23125, Vesting Tentative
Tract Map No. 23125, first extension of time, Vesting Tentative Tract Map No.
23125, second extension of time, (copies of which are attached) unless superseded
by these Conditions of Approval.
PRIOR TO THE RECORDATION OF RNAL MAP:
e
Prior to recordation of the final map, an Environmental Constraints Sheet (ECS) shall
be prepared in conjunction with the final map to delineate identified environmental
concerns and shall be permanently filed with the office of the City Engineer. A copy
of the ECS shall be transmitted to the Planning Department for review and approval.
The approved ECS shall be forwarded with copies of the recorded final map to the
Planning Department and the Department of Building and Safety. The following notes
shall be added to the Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS):
R:~'I$1'AFFRFI'a317,~3.COA 7J17;93 Idb
"This property is located within thirty (30) miles of Mount Palomar Observatory.
All proposed oLrtdoor lighting systems shall comply with the California Institute
of Technology, Palomar Observatory recommendations."
be
"County Environmental Impact Report No. 263 was prepared for this property
and is on file at the Riverside County Planning Department."
Ce
"A portion of this 'project lies within the 100-year flood plain." The 100-year
flood plain shall be delineated on fie ECS sheet.
The applicant shall submit for Planning Director approval a mitigation monitoring
program that complies with County Environmental Impact Report No. 263 and the
attached conditions of approval prior to recordation of the Final Map or Grading Permit
issuance, whichever occurs first,
The application shall provide written clearance from the California Department of Fish
and Game for the processing of a 1603 Streambed Alteration Permit Agreement.
The application shall provide written clearance from the Los Angeles District, Army
Corps of Engineers for the processing of a Section 404 permit.
DEPARTMENT OF PUBUC WORKS
The following are additional Conditions of Approval of the Department of Public Works for this
project, and shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency, All previous
Conditions of Approval shall remain in force except as amended or superseded by the
following requirements. All questions regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be
referred to the appropriate staff person of the Department of Public Works.
It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the tentative site plan all existing and
I~roposed easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage courses, and their
omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and revision.
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
ge
A Grading Permit for either rough or precise (including all on-site flat work and
improvements) construction shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works
prior to commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained road right-
of-way.
10.
An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior
to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City
right-of-way.
11.
All improvement plans, grading plans, landscape and irrigation
coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing
contiguous to the site.
plans shall be
improvements
R:~$~r~I25-3.COA 2/WY3 Idb
12.
PRIOR
13.
14..
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
Pursuant to Section 66493 of the Subdivision Map Act, any subdivision which is part
of an existing Assessment District must comply with the requirements of said section.
TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS:
The final grading plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be
reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works,
All lot drainage shall be directed to the driveway by side yard drainage swales
independent of any other lot,
Prior to issuance of a grading permit, developer must comply with the requirements of
the National Pollutant Discharge Bimination System (NPDES) permit from the State
Water Resources Control Board, No grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice
of Intent has been filed or the project is shown to be exempt,
Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the developer shall receive written clearance
from the following agencies:
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
San Diego Regional Water Quality;
Riverside County Rood Control and Water Conservation District;
Planning Department;
Department of Public Works;
Riverside County Health Department;
General Telephone:
Southern California Edison Company; and
Southern California Gas Company,
A Soils Report shall be prepared by a registered soils engineer and submitted to the
Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall
address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the
construction of engineered structures and pavement sections,
An erosion control plan shall be prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer and submitted
to the Department of Public Works for review and approval.
Graded but undeveloped land shall be maintained in a weed-free condition and shall be
either planted with interim landscaping or provided with other erosion control measures
as approved by the Department of Public Works.
A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the prevailing Area
Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new development. The charge is
payable to the Riverside County Rood Control and Water Conservation District prior
to issuance of permits. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has been
already credited to this property-, no new charge needs to be paid.
The developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or easements for off-site
work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public Works.
22.
23.
24.
PRIOR
25.
26.
27.
28.
The subdivider shall accept and properly dispose of all off-site drainage flowing onto
or through the site. In the event the Department of Public Works permits the use of
streets for drainage purposes, the provisions of Article XI or Ordinance No. 460 will
apply. Should the quantities exceed the street capacity, or use of meets be prohibited
for drainage purposes, the subdivider shall provide adequate facilities as approved by
the Department of Public Works.
The subdivider shall protect downstream properties from damages caused by alteration
of the drainage patterns; i,e,, concentration or diversion of flow, Protection shall be
.provided by constructing adequate drainage facilities, including enlarging existing
facilities or by securing a drainage easement,
A drainage easement shall be obtained from the affected property owners for-the
release of concentrated or diverted storm flows onto the adjacent property, A copy
of the drainage easement shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for
review prior to recordation, The location of the recorded easement shall be delineated
on the grading plan,
TO THE ISSUANCE OF ENCROACHMENT PERMITS:
All necessary grading permit requirements shall have been submitted/accomplished to
the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works.
The following criteria shall be observed in the design of the improvement plans to be
submitted to the Department of Public Works:
Flow line grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P..C.C. and 1.00% minimum over
A.C. paving.
be
Street lights shall be installed along the public streets adjoining the site in
accordance with Ordinance 461 and shall be shown on the improvement plans
as directed by the Department of Public Works.
All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees or as
approved by the Department of Public Works.
de
Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cutoff area of all intersections and
adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility.
All concentrated drainage directed towards the public street shall be conveyed
through under-sidewalk drains.
All driveways shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula Standards and shall be
shown on the street improvement plans in accordance with City Standard Nos. 207
and 208.
All driveways shall be located a minimum of two (2) feet from the side property line,
29.
All utility systems including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer, and cable TV shall
be provided for underground, with easements provided as required, and designed' and
constructed in accordance with City Codes and the utility. provider. Telephone, cable
TV, and/or security systems shall be pre-wired in the residence.
30.
31.
All utilities, except electrical lines rated 33kv or greater, shall be installed underground,
A construction area traffic control plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer
and approved by the City Engineer for any street closure and detour or other disruption
to traffic circulation as required by the Department of Public Works.
PRIOR TO RECORDATION OF RNAL MAP:
32.
The developer shall construct or post security and enter into an agreement
guaranteeing the construction of the following public improvements in conformance
with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public
Works,
Street improvements, which may include, but not limited to: pavement, curb
and gutter, sidewalks, drive approaches, street lights, signing, and other traffic
control devices as appropriate,
b. Storm drain facilities.
Ce
Landscaping (slopes and parkways).
Erosion control and slope protection.
e. Sewer and domestic water systems.
f. All trails, as required by the City's Master Plans.
g. Undergrounding of proposed utility distribution lines.
33.
As deemed necessary by the Department of Public works, the developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
San Diego Regional Water Quality
Rancho California Water District
Eastern Municipal Water District
Riverside County Rood Control and Water Conservation District
City of Temecula Fire Bureau
Planning Department
Department of Public Works
Riverside' County Health Department
CATV Franchise
Caltrans
Community Services District
General Telephone
Southern California Edison Company; and
Southern California Gas Compar}y
]t:~'TAF'F]tFr'~13125-3.COA ~ klb
34.
35.
36.
37.
PRIOR
38.
39.
40.
Easements, when required for roadway slopes, landscape easements, drainage
facilities, utilities, etc., shall be shown on the final map if they are located within the
land division boundary. All offers of dedication and conveyances shall be submitted
and recorded as directed by the Department of Public Works. For on-site drainage
facilities, a note shall be added to the final map stating "drainage easements shall be
kept free of buildings and obstructions."
The developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an
Environmental Constraint Sheet recorded with any underlying maps related to the
subject property.
Prior to recordation of the final map, the subdivider shall notify the City's CA'I"V
Franchises of the Intent to Develop. Conduit shall be installed to CA'iV Standards at
time of street improvements.
Legal all-weather access as required by Ordinance 460 shall be provided from the tract
map boundary to a paved City maintained road,
TO BUILDING PERMIT:
A precise grading plan shall be submitrod to the Department of Public Works for review
and approval. The building pad shall be certified by a Registered Civil Engineer for
location and elevation, and the Soils Engineer shall issue a Final Soils Report addressing
compaction and site conditions.
Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code,
CiW Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall
be in substantial conformance with the approved rough grading plan.
Developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities imposed
upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public facility mitigation as
required under the EIR/Negative Declaration for the project. The fee to be paid shall
be in the amount in effect at the time of payment of the fee. If an interim or final
public facility mitigation fee or district has not been finally established by the date on
which developer requests its building permits for the project, or any phase thereof, the
developer shall execute the Agreement for payment of Public Facility fee, a copy of
which has been provided to developer. Concurrently with executing this Agreement,
developer shall post a bond to secure payment of the Public Facility fee. The amount
of the bond shall be $2.00 per square foot, not to exceed $10,000. Developer
understands that said Agreement may require the payment of fees in excess of those
now estimated (assuming benefit to the project in the amount of such fees). By
execution of this Agreement, developer will waive any right to protest the provisions
of this Condition, of this Agreement, the formation of any traffic impact fee district,
or the process, levy, or collection of any traffic mitigation or traffic impact fee for this
project: provided that developer is not waiving its right to protest the reasonableness
of any traffic impact fee, and the amount thereof.
It:Lf~TAFFR]q'~I25-3.COA 2/9/93 Idb
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIRCATES OF OCCUPANCY:
41.
All improvements shall be completed and in place per apl3roved plans, including but not
limited to, curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway trees,
and street lights on all interior public streets.
42.
Landscaping installed in the comer cutoff area of all intersections and adjacent to
driveways shall be reviewed and approved in the field for minimum sight distance as
directed by the Department of Public Works.
43.
A 32-foot wide secondary access road shall be constructed within a recorded private
road easement as approved by the Department of Public Works.
4'5.
46.
Asphaltic emulsion (fog seal) shall be applied not leas than 14 days following
placement of the asphalt surfacing and shell be applied at a rate of 0.05 gallon per
square yard. Asphalt emulsion shall conform to Section Nos. 37, 39, and 94 of the
State Standard Specifications.
The developer shall provide "STOP" controls at the intersection of local streets with
arterial streets as directed by the Department of Public Works.
All signing and striping shall be installed .per the approved signing and striping plans.
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
47.
The applicant shall comply the recommendations outlined in the CommuniW Services
Department transmirml dated September 10, 1991, a copy of which is attached.
City of Ternecula
4,117~ Busmness P~rk Dnve · Temecula, C~liforn~ gZ~gO
September 10, 1991
Ronald J, Parks
PairIota H. Birdsall
M~,or Pr; Tern
Karel F. Lindemans
Councilrefiner
Peg Moore
Counamm,-m~er
J. Sal Mu~oz
CouncztmemDer
David F. DIxon
Ci~ Manager
(714) 694-1989
FAX 1714) 694-1999
Mr. Dave Gilbert
Sterling Builders
19762 MacArthur Blvd., Suite 200
!rvine, CA 927! 5
SUBJECT: TRACT NUMBER 23125
Dear Mr. Gilbert:
I have reviewed the proposed development of Tract No. 23125 as it relates
to Park Land Dedication and slope maintenance and conclude with the
following:
The exterior (perimeter) slopes proposed in the aforementioned tract
may be dedicated to the TCSD by way of an irrevocable offer to
dedicate for landscape maintenance purposes, upon compliance to
existing standards as approved by the TCSD, and upon completion
of the application process.
The proposed tract consists of 212 single family residential homes.
The Parkland Dedication Requirement (Quimby) is 2.75 acres or
payment of the equivalent fair market value plus 20% for off-site.
improvements.
The proposed tract has identified a 2.75 acre active park, to comply with
the required parkland dedication·
The Sterling Ranch Final Environmental Impact Report No. 263 dated March
25, I988 indicates that an 8 acre park will be developed. This requirement
can be found on page 11 Section (b.) Park Site. The proposed 8 acre park
site is shown on Exhibit 11-2C. and consists of a 2.75 acre active park and
a 5.25 acre wetland.
In addition to the 8 acres, approximately 10 acres of undeveloped open
space contiguous with the proposed park site, will be dedicated to the
TCSD.
The proposed 2.75 acre active park site shall be developed to TCSD
standards prior to the issuance of the 63rd building permit.
The exterior slope maintenance areas proposed to be maintained by the
TCSD shall be properly identified on the final map.
Should you have any further Guestions my telephone number is (71 ~.) 694-
6480.
Applicant or his assignee agrees
ApOlicant/Signature
Very truly,
to the aforementioned conditions as
Date
CiTY (
.- /
)Sar
~ment Services Administrator
AMENDMENT NO. 01 TO LETi'ER OF AGREEMENT
DATED:Seotember 13. 1991
Seotember 17.1992
The Letter of Agreement dated Seotember 13. 1991 between the City of Temecula,
Communi~ Services Department (TCSD) and C,,rrent Owner of Tract No. 23125.
(hereinaf~er referred to as "Agreement") is hereby amended as follows:
Re: ADDITIONAL DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS
Section 1
TCSD conditions are hereby amended to include additional recluirements as follows:
Applicant shall cooperate with TCSD in providing and improving open space
trails to inter-link with proposed and/or existing trails ajoining this proper~y, to
TCSD standards.
Applicant shall develop proposed island medians on Buyerfield Stage Road, per
TCSD standards.
Section 2
All other terms and conditions of the Letter of Agreement shall remain the same.
The parties hereto have executed this Amendment on the date and year above
written.
CITY OF TclMECULA
AUG 5'1 19S2
ADDITIONAL C~DITIONS OF APPaOVAL
CITY OF TEMECULA
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23125
Second Extension of Time
City council Approval Date: November !2, 1991
Expiration Date: October 20, 1992
Pl---~ng Department
Unless previously paid, prior to the issuance of a grading
permit, the applic-nt shall comply wi~h ~he provisions of
Ordinance No. 663 by paying the a.r~ropriate fee set forth in
that ordinance. Should Ordi-ance No. 663 be supersededbythe
provisions of a Habitat ConservationPlan prior to the payment
of the fee required by Or~nsnce No. 663, the applicant shall
pay the fee required by the Habitat Conservation Plan as
implemanted by County o~dimance or resolution.
The park land dedication requirement shall be a predetermined
amount based on the use =-d number of units proposed. If the
Park land requirement cannon be met, the applicant shall be
required to pay a predetermined Quimby Act Fee in the amount
equal to the fair market value of the required park
acreage (Plus 20% for offsite improvements).
No building permits shall be issued by the City for ~y
residential lot/unit within the project boundary until the
deve!oper's successor's-in-interest provides evidence of
compliance with public facility financing measures. A cash
sum of one-hundred dollars ($100) per lot/unit shall be
deposiced with the City as mitigation for public library
development.
This conditionally approved Extension of Time for Vesting
Tentative Tract Map No. 23125 will expire one (1) year after
the original expiration da:e, unless extended as provided by
Ordim~nce 460. The expiration date is October 20, 1992.
The subdivider shall comply with the original Conditions of
Approval for Tentative Tract Map No. 23125 (see attached)
except as amended herein.
Prior to recordation of Vesting Tentative Tract No. 23125,
Change of Zone No. 17 shall be effective.
The applicant shall comply with the California Department of
Fish and Game (Streambed Alteration Agreement 5-38!-90)
reco~,enda=ions ouu!ined in =he =ransmi:tal daued Au_cusu 18,
1990, a copy of which is annached.
The applicant shall comply winh the Los Angeles Disuricz,
Corps of Engineers recommendations ou:!ined in the transmlzzal
dated February 8, 1991, a copy of which is antached.
Engineering Depar=memt
The following are =he Engineering Depar=menn Conditions of Approval
for Zhis project, and shall be comple=ed an no cosu :o any
GovernmennAgency. All quesnions regarding =he =rue meaning of the
conditions shall be referred no =he Engineering Deparr,ment. The
developer shall com. ly winh all previous Condi=ions of Approval
except as amended by the following condinions.
I= is understood =hat the Developer correctly shows all existing
easements, traveledways, and drainage courses, and their omission
may require .the project to be resubmi=ted for further
consideration.
PRIOR TO RaCORDATION OF TK~ FINAL MAP
9. As deemed necessary by ~he City Engineer or his
representative, the developer shall receive wrintenclearance
from the following agencies:
Rancho California Waner Dis=rich;
Eastern Municipal Water District;
Riverside County Flood Control district;
Ciny of Temecula Fire Bureau;
Pl~--ing Depar=ment;
Engineering DeparT, me=t;
Riverside County Health Deparnmenn;
CATV Franchise;
Parks and Recreation DeparUment; and
Temecula Communiny Services Disnricz.
10.
Prior-to final map, the subdivider shall notify the City's
CATV Franchises of the Inuent to Develop. Conduit shall be
installed to CATV St~-dards at time of street improvements.
11.
Pursuant to Section 66493 of =he Subdivision Map Act any
Subdivision which is par= of an existing Assessment District
must comply with the requirements of said section.
PRIOB TO ISSUANC~ OF GRADING PERMITS
12.
Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees
shall be paid and an encroachment permit shall be obtained
from the City Engineer's Office.
13. A grading permit shall be obtained from the Engineering
Department prior to commencement of any grading cutside cf the
City-maintained road right-of-way.
PEZOE TO BUILDING PEPaCT
14.
A precise grading ply- shall. be submitted to the Engineering
Department for reviewan d approval. The building pad shall be
cer-.ified by a registered Civil Engineer for location m-d
elevation, and the Soil Engineer 'shall issue a Final Soils
Report addressing compaction and site conditions.
Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with
the UniformBuilding Code, City Grading Standards and accepted
grading practices. The final grading plam shall be in
substantial conform~-ce with =he alproved rough grading ply-.
16.
Developer shall pay~uy capital fee for road improvements and
public facilities imposed upon =he property or project,
including .that for traffic ~-~ public facility mitigation as
required under the EIR/Negative Declaration for ~he project.
The fee to be paid shall be in ~he amount in effect at the
time of payment of =he fee. If an innarm or final public
facility mitigation fee or district ~=m not bean finally
established by =he dane on which developer requests its
building permits for =he project or ~-y phase thereof, the
developer shall execute =he Agreement for payment of Public
Facility fee, a copy of which has bee=provided no developer.
Concurrennly., with executing =his Acjreemenn, developer shall
post a bond no secure payment of the Public Facility fee. The
amcunt of the bond shall be $2.00 per square foot, non zo
exceed $10,000. Developer umderstandsr. hat saidAgreement may
require the payment of fees in excess of =hose now estimated
(assuming benefit to the project in theamount of such fees).
By exec~tion ofthisAgreemenn, developer willwaive any right
to protest the provisions of taxis Condition, .of this
Agreement, the formation of ~-y traffic impact fee district,
or the process, lev~, or collection of m-y traffic mitigation
or traffic impact fee for this project; prov~ea =hat
developer is not waiving its right to protest =he
reasonableness of any traffic imp_act fee, and the amount
thereof.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CEBTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY
17.
If cons=run:ion of improvements are phasedan d completed prior
to development occurring on adjacent properties, a 28' wide
secondary access road shall be provided winhim a recorded
.private road easement as approved by the City Engineer.
~8
Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open
to traffic at all times with adequate detours during
construction.
Transportation Engineering
~BI0~ TO E~COP, D~ON OF Ta~ FINAL MAP
19.
A signing plan shall be desi,cmed by a Registered CAvil
Engineer and amproved by the City Engineer for all internal
streets with 66' of right-of-way or less and shall be shown on
the street improvement plans.
20. Condition No. 32 of the P/verside County Road letter dated
June 28, 1988, shall be deleted.
Temecula C~ ....... ,-4t7 Service District (TCSD) Department
21.
The exterior (perimeter) Slopes proposed in the Tract Map No.
23125 (lots 213 and 214) may be dedicated no the TCSD by way
of an irrevocable offer to dedicate for landscape maintenance
purposes, upon compliance =o existing sc~-dards as approved by
the TCSD, and upon completion of the application process.
22.
The Parkland Dedication Requirement (Quimby) is 2.75 acres of
improved parklar~ Co be de~Lcaced Co the TCSD prior
issuance of 63rd Building Permit.
23.
24.
Prior to recordation of the fizal map, the applic}-U shall
offer for dedication 2.75 acres of land (1on 218) and execute
wiZh the TCSDand agreememt to imp. rove the proposed 2.7S acre
park in accordance with TCSD standards an the time of
execution for park purposes within the area currennly
designated as a wetland. In the evenn that in is determined
no be infeasible to provide parklandwinhin the wetland area,
applicant shall provide the requiredamount of l~-d dedication
and improvements at an alter-~te location within the project
site. The responsibility for the maintenance and im~rovemenn
of the remaining open space area (lot 217) shall be borne by
the applicant and/or h~meowners associatiom until such time
than improvements as required by State and Federal law are
satisfied.
Apprdximately 11.1 acres of undeveloped open space contiguous
with the proposed park site identified as Lot 215 and
approximately 2.6 acres of wetland identified as Lot 217 shall
be dedicated to the TCSD upon completion and acceptance of
required improvements, and prior to the issuance of the 63rd
Building Permit.
25.
All interior slopes (lots 219 through 225) including Lot 216
shall be maintained by ~- HOA.
26.
The exterior slope maintenance areas (lots 213 and 214)
proposed to be maintained by the TCSD shall be properly
identified on the final map.
27.
Riverside County Condition Nos. 18, d and e shall be replaced
by the following condition:
All non-arterial slopes shall be maintained by the esta~!ished
homeowners association for the subject tract (Vest!-_~
Tentative Tract Map No. 23125).
Prior to recordation of the final map, a grading plan for the
project shall be approved by the City Engineer.
ATTACHMENT 4
C~TY OF T~CUL~
ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS OF A~PEOVAL
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23125
First Extension of Time
City Council Approval Date: October 22, 1991
Expiration Date:
October 20, 1991
Pl---ing Department
1. Unless previously paid, prior to the issuance of a grading
pe_~nit, the applicant shall comply with the provisions of
Ordinance No. 663 by paying the appropriate fee set forth in
that ordi-~nce. Should Ordi~s"ce No. 663 be superseded by the
provisions of a Habitat Conservation Pla, prior to the payment
of the fee required by Ordinance No. 663, the applicant shall
pay the fee required by the ~abitat Comservation Plan as
implemented by County ordinance or resolution.
2. TX.~ jul~ivi~, 31all ~z~i~c fat Ehc =cdi~Zia~ ~{ ~=,k
IT. COZLDA~ICN sf fi_xl ~, a3 auZh~zia~i 3y City cf T~.ezula
0~di~ec l~e. leO.D3.
The park land dedication requirement shall be a predetermined
amount based on the use ~-d number of units proposed. If the
park land requirement c~--ot .be met, the applicant shall be
required to pay a predetermined Quimby Act Fee in the amount
equal to the fair market value of the required park land
acreage (Plus 20% for offsite improvements).
No building permits shall be issued by the City for
resident'ial lot/unit within the project boundary until the
developer's successor's-in-interest .provides evidence of
compliance with public facility financing measures. A cash
sum of one-hundred dollars ($100) per lot/unit shall be
deposited with the City as mitigation for public library
development.
This conditionally approved Extension of Time for Vesting
Tentative Tract Map No. 23125 will expire one (1) year after
the original expiration date,-unless extended as provided by
Ordinance 460. The expiration date is October 20, 1991.
The subdivider shall com~ly with the origi~l Conditions of
Approval for Tennative Tract Map No. 23125 (see attached)
except as amended herein.
Prior :o recorda=ion, Change of Zone No. 17 shall
effective.
The applicann shall comply wish =he California Departme~_z cf
Fish and Game ( S :reamed A1 :era:ion Agreemen: 5 - 381 - 90
reco=:nendaCions outlined in the c=~--~miCzal dated Augus= 18,
1990, a copy of which is as:ached.
The applican: shall comply with the Los Angeles Dis=ritz,
Corps of Engineers recommendations oun!inedinthe transmit:a!
dated Februar7 8, 1991, a copy of which is annached.
'm',",gimeerimg Departmere=
The following are :he Engineering Depar'amect Conditions of Approval
for :his projet:, am~ shall be com~le:e~ an no cos:
GovermmentAgemcy. AllqueStions regarding=he true mem-ing of the
conditions shall be referred to the Engineering Department. The
developer shall com~ly with all previous Condi:ions of Approval
excep: as amended by the following conditions.
I: is understood than :he Developer correcZ!y shows all exiszing
easements, traveled ways, and drainage courses, and :heir omission
may require :he project to be resubmiCted for furuher
considera:ion.
P~IOR TO EECOEDATION OF THE FINAL MAP:
As deemed necessary by the Ci:y Engineer or his
represen:anive, the developer shall receive wrintenclearance
from the following agencies:
Rancho California Water District;
Eastern Municipal Water Dis:rio=;
Riverside County Flood Couurol disUric:;
City of Temecula Fire BureaU;
Plannimg Department;
Engineering Department;
Riverside Counuy Health Department;
CATV Franchise;
Parks and Recreation Departmen:; and
Temecula Co..~.,.,-~:y Services District.
10.
Any Notice of I_tc_tic_ Zo n===~cx inte the T~_csula Ce._~_ity
Ccr~icc Dist_is%, Cc_~'ic: kvcl "C" (Lazd~.a~c
final ~ap.. ~! ~OSE3 i_volvc~ i~ Di~t. ict ~--=~tic~ shall
11.
Notice of Intz:tien to ~cx into t~c T---~-cula
Ez-~'icc District, Sat:ice Level "A"
zub.ittc~ to TCSD prisz to r.--zordanian of Ehc fial
:2.
d~v:l 3=e;
Prior no fi.al map, the subdivider shall notify :he Cizy's
CATV Franchises of the Intenn no Develop· Conduit shall be
installed no CATV Standards an time of street improvemenns.
13.
Pursuann no Section 66493 of the Subdivision Map Act ~y
Subdivision which is pare of an existing Assessment Dis:riot
must comply with ~he requirements of said section.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS:
14.
Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees
shall be paid and an encroachment permit shall be obtained
from the City Engineer's Office.
15.
A grading permit shall be obtained from the Engineering
Depar=menn prior no co-w~-c~menn of any grading outside of the
City-maintained road right-of-way.
PRIOR'TO BUILDING PERMIT:
16.
A precise grading pl=- shall be submitted to the Engineering
Depar=menn for review an d approval. The building pad shall be
certified by a registered Civil Engineer for location
elevation, and the Soil Engineer shall issue a Final Soils
Reporn addressing compaction and sine conditions.
17.
Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with
the UniformBuilding Code, CityGrading Standards and accepted
grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in
subsnannial confor.~mce with .the approved rough grading plan.
18.
Developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and
public facilities im~.osed upon the property or project,
including ~han for traffic and public facility mitigation as
required under ~he EIR/Neganive Declaration for ~he project.
The fee to be paid shall be in the amount in effect at the
time of paymenn of the fee. If an interim or final public
facility mitigation fee or district has non been finally
established by the date on which developer requests ins
building permits for :he project or any phase thereof, the
developer shall execute the Agreemenn for paymenn of Public
Facility fee, a copy of which has been provided to developer.
Concurrennly, with executing this Agreement, developer shall
post a bond to secure paSanent of the Public Facility fee. The
amounn of the bond shall be $2.00 per square foot, non no
exceed $10,000. Developer understandsnhat saidAgreement may
require the payment of fees in excess of those now estimated
(assuming benefit no the project in T. he amount of such fees)·
By execution of nhis Agreemenn, developer willwaive any right
no protest the provisions of this Condition, of this
Agreement, the formation of any traffic impact fee district,
or the process, levy, or collection of any traffic mitigation
or traffic impact fee for this project; p~ov~e~. that
developer is not waiving its right to protest the
reasonableness of ~-y traffic impact' fee, and the amour:
thereof.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY:
19.
If construction of im~rovementsarephasedandcom~leted prior
to developmeat occurring on adjacemt properties, a 28' wide
secondary access road sh. ll be provided within a recorded
private road easement as approved by the City Engineer.
Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain. open
to traffic at all times with adequate detours during
construction.
TramsporCaCiou e-gimeer~g
PRIOR TO P. ECOPaATION OF THM FINAL MA~:
21.
A signing plan Shall be designed by a Registered Civil
Engineer and approved by the City Engineer for all
streets with 66' of right-of-way or less ~d shall be shown on
the street improvement plans.
22.
Condition No. 32 of the Riverside County Road letter dated
June 28, 1988, shall be deleted.
Temecula C~ ....... ,-ity Setvine DisCriot (TCSD) Departmeat
23.
The exterior (perimeter) slopes proposed in the Tract Map No.
23125 may be dedicated to the TCSD by way of ~- irrevocable
offer to dedicate for landscape maint--~-ce purposes, upon
compliance to existing st~-dards as approvedby the TCSD, and
upon completion of the application process.
The Parkl~d Dedication Requirement (Quimby) is 2.75 acres of
improved parkland to be dedicated to the TCSD prior to
issuance of 63rd Building Pe_~nit.
25.
Approximately 12 acres of undeveloped open space contiguous
with the proposed park site identified as Lot "C" shall be
offered for dedication to the TCSD upon completion of required
improvements,_and prior to the issue-co of the 63rd Building
Permit.
26.
All interior slopes including Lot "D" shall be mintained by
an HOA.
27.
The exterior slope maintenance areas proposed to be maintained
by the TCSD shall be properly identified on the final map.
28.
29.
3O.
Riverside County Condition Nos. 18, d and · shall be replaced
by=he following condition:
All non-arterial slopes shall be maintained by the established
homeowners association for the subject tract (Vesning
Tentative Tract Map No. 23125).
Prior to recordation of =he final map, the applicant shall
offer for dedica=ion 2.75 acres of.land (lon "A") and execune
with the TCSD ~-d agreeman= to improve =he proposed 2.75 acre
park in accor~-ce with TCSD standards an the time of
execunion for park purposes winhi= ~he area currenn!y
desig-~ted as a we=land. In the eveut that it is determined
uo be infeasible Co provide parklandwinhin the we=land area,
applicm-t shall provide the required amounn of l--d dedication
and improvemenns a= an alnerna=e locanion wi=hin nhe projecn
site. The responsibility for the maintenance and imp_rovement
of =he remaining open space area (lon "B') shall be borne by
the applicant ~-a/or homeowneD association until such time
nhan improvemenus as required by Stane and Federal law are
satisfied.
Prior to recordation of the final map, a grading plan for the
projecn.shall be approvedby the City Engineer.
RZVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTHENT
SUBDZVZSZON
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 23125
AHENDE) NO. 2
DATE.:
STANDARD CONDITIONS
1. The subdivider shall defend, indemnify, and hold hamless the County of
· Riverside, its agents, officers, and employees fra~ any claim, action, or
c"' proceeding against the County of Riverside or its agents, officers, or.
c employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the County
-~ ~f Riverside, its advisory agencies, appeal boards or legislative body
·
~ concerning Vesting Tentative Tract No. 23125, which action is brought
about within'the time period provided for in California Government Code
;ection 66499.37. The County of Riverside will promptly notify the
) rubdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the County of
~ ~iverside and will cooperate fully in the defense. If the County fails to
~ro~ptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding or'
~ :ails to cooperate fully in 'the defense, the subdivider shall not,
> ,thereafter, be responsible. to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the
c County of Riverside.
The tentative subdivision shall comply with the State of California
Subdivision I~ap Act and to all the requirements. of Ordinance 460, Schedule
A, unless mo<lified by the conditions. listed below,
This conditionally approved tentative map will expire two years after the
County of Riverside Board of Supervisors approval date, unless extended as
provided by Ordinance 460.
The final map shall be prepared by a licensed land surveyor subject to all
the requirements of the State of California Subdivision l~ap Act and
Ordinance 460,
5. The subdivider shall submit one copy of a soils report to the Riverside
County Surveyor's Office and two copies to the Deparl~ent of Building and
Safety. The report shall address the soils stability and geological
conditions of the site.
6. If any grading is proposed, the subdivider shall submit one print of
comprehensive grading plan to the Oepar~ent of Building and Safety- The
plan shall comply with the Unifom Building Code, Chapter 70, as mended
r
by Ordinance 457 and as maybe additionally p ovided for in these
conditions of approval.
VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT RO, 23125, Amcl, ~Z
C~mditions of Approval
Page 2
7. A grading permit shall be obtained from the Deparl=ent of Building and
Safety prior to cannoncement of any grading outside of county maintained
road right of Nay.
Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid prior to recordation of the
final map.
The subdivider shall comply with the street improvement recoff~endations
outlined in the Riverside County Road Department's letter dated 6-28-88, a
copy of which is attached.
10. Legal access as required by Ordinance 460 shall be provided from the tract
map boundary to a County maintained road.
11, All road easements shall be offered for dedication to the public and shall
continue in force until the governing body accepts or abandons such
offers. All dedications shall be free from all encun~rances as approved
by the Road Comnissioner. Street names shall be subject to approval of
the Road Commissioner.
Easements, when required for roadway slopes, drainage facilities,
utilities, etc., shall be shown on the final map if they are located
within the land division boundary. All offers of dedication and
conveyances shall be submitted and recorded as directed by the County
Surveyor.
13. Water and sewerage disposal facilities shall be installed in accordance
with the provisions set forth in the Riverside County Health Deparl=ent's
letter dated 6-23-BB, a copy of which is attached.
~:"** 14. The subdivider shall comply with the flood control recommendations
~,.{'- =:~. out)d by the Riverside County Flood Control District's letter dated
.-;~:~ -*."*..~6-ZB-BB.x a copy of which is attached. · If the land division lies within an
~.~. ~;,~/;~o~(~ea'flood control drainage area pursuant to Section 10.25 of Ordinance
" '.' ,,' 460, appropriata fees for the construction of area drainage facilities
shall be collected by the Road Commissioner.
15.
?he subdivider shall comply with the fire improvement recommendations
outlined in the County Fire Parshal's letter dated 6-22-BB, a copy of
which is attached.
16.
subdivision phasing, including any proposed common open space area
improvement phasing, if applicable, shall be subject to Planning
Oeparl=ent approval .. Any proposed phasing shall provide for adequ e
vehicular access to all lots in 'each phase, and shall substantia Y
conform to the intent and'purpose of the subdivision approval.
17. Lots.created by this subdivision shall comply with the following:
YESTI~G TEiqTATIVE TitACT MO. 23125, Amd. 12
Conditions of Approval
Page 3
a. All lots shall have a minimum size of 7200 square feet net.
b. All lot length to width ratios shall be in conformance with Section
3.8C of Ordinance 460.
Graded bJt undeveloped land shall be maintained in a weed-free
condition and shall be either planted with interim landscaping or
provided with other erosion control measures as approved by the
Director of Building and Safety.,
Prior to RECORDATXON of the final map the following conditions shall be
satisfied:
Prior to the recordation of the final map the applicant shall submit
written clearances to the Riverside County Road and Survey Department
that all pertinent requirements outlined in the attached approval
letters from the following agencies have been met:
County Fire Oepart~nent
County Rood Control
County Health Oepart~nent
County Planning Department
Prior to the recordation of the final map, Change of Zone No. 5122
shall be approved by the Board of Supervisors and shall be effective.'
Lots created by this land division shall be in conformance with the
developnent standards of the zone ultimately applied to the property.
;. p~or to -=co~dation of the final map, the project ,i~e shall be
· nncxad it, to L"JA
Prior to recordation of the final map, the subdivider shall convey to
the County fee simple title, to all common or common open space areas,
free and clear of all liens, taxes, assessment, leases (recorded and
unrecorded) and easements, except those easements which in the sole
discretion of the County are acceptable. 'As a conditions precedent to
the County accepting title to such areas, the subdivider shall submit
the following documents to the Planning Deparl~nent for review, which
documents shall be subject to the approval of that depar~ent and the
Office of the County Counsel:
1)
z)
A declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions; and
A'sample document conveying title to the purchaser of an
individual lot or unit which provides that the declaration of
covenants, conditions and restrictions is incorporated therein by
reference.
YEST]RG TEXTATIYIE TRACT NO. 23125, And.
Conditions of Approval '
Page 4
The declaration of covenantS, conditions and restrictions subm.,itted
for review shall (a) provide for a term of 60 years, (b) provide for
the establisi~nent of a property owners' association comprised of the
owners of each individual lot or unit and (c) contain the following
provisions verbatim:
· Notwithstanding any provision in this Declaration* tO the
contrary, the following provision shall apply:
Oftce
restrictions shall be recorded at the same time that the final map
recorded.
The property owners' association established herein shall. if
dornmnt, be activated, by incorporation or otherwise, at the
request of the County of Riverside, and the property owners'
association shall unconditionally accept frcm the County of
Riverside, upon the County's demand, title to all or any part of
the 'common area', more particularly described on Exhiblt'A'
attached hereto. The decision to require activation of the
property owners' association and the decision to require that the
association unconditionally accept title to the 'connon area'
shall be at the. sole discretion of the County of Riverside.
In the event that the common area, or any part thereof, is
conveyed to the rope~ty owners' association, the association.
thereafter shal~ own such 'common area', shall manage and
continuously maintain such 'common area', or any part thereof,
absent the prior written consent of the Planning Director of the
County of Riverside or the County's successor-in-interest- The
property owners' association shall have the right to assess the
owners of each individual lot or unit for the reasonable cost of
maintaining such 'common area', and shall have the right to lien
the property of any such owner who defaults in the payment of a
maintenance assessment. An assessment lien, once created, shall
be prior to all other liens recorded subsequent to the notice of
assessment or other document creating the assessment lien.
This Declaration shall not be terminated, 'substantially' amended
or. property deannexed therefrom absent the prior written consent
.of the Planning Director of the County of Riverside or the
County's successor-in-interest. A proposed amendmentshall be
considered 'substantial' if it affects the extent, usage or
maintenance of the 'common area'.
In the event of any conflict between this Declaration and the
Articles of Incorporation, the Bylaws, or the property owners'
association Rules and-Regulations, if any, this Declaration shall
control .'
approved, the declaration of covenants, conditions and
is
VESTIll; TEXTAT~VE TRACT RO. ~3125, Am~. ~2
.Conditians of Approval
Page 5
19.
e. The developer shall be responsible for maintenance and upkeep of all
slopes, landscaped areas and irrigation systems until such tim as
those operations are the responsibilities of other parties as approved
by the Planning Director.
f. Prior to recordation of the final map, an Environmental Constraints
Sheet (ECS) shall be prepared in conjunction with the final map to
delineate identified environmental concerns and shall be .permanentl
filed with the office of the County Surveyor. A copy of the EC$ shal~
be tranmitted to the Planning Department for review and approval.
The approved ECS shall be forwarded with copies of the recorded final
map to the Planning Department and the Department of Building and
Safety.
g. The following note shall be placed on the Environmental Constraints
Sheet: 'County Environmental Impact Report No..263 was prepared for
this property and is on file at the Riverside County Planning
Department.
Prior to the issuance of GRADZNG PE.t~ITS the following conditions shall be
satisfied:
a. All mitigation for seismic and liquefaction hazard shall be that which
is found in.Environmental Impact Report No. 263.
b. The following tree preservation guidelines shall be incorporated in
the projects approved grading, building and landscaping plans as
appropriate:
1. Every effort shall be made to prevent encroac)ent of structures,
grading or trenching within the dripline or twenty-five (Z5) feet
of the trunk of any treest whichever is greater.
2. If encroac~nent within the dripline is unavoidable, no more than
one third of the root area shall be disturbed, grading or covered
with impervious materials. The root area is considered to extend
beyond the dripline a distance equal to one half the radius.
3. Building, grading or improvements shall not occur within ten {10)
feet of any tree trunk.
4. Retaining walls shall be constructed where necessary to preserve
natural rade at least one-half the distance between the trunk and
the dripVine. Walls shall be designed with a post or caisson
footing rather than a continuous footing to minimize root damage.
Y[STZN; TE)fTATIYE TRACT II0. 23125,
Cond i ti ms of Approval '
Page 6
Alteration of natural drainage shall be avoided to the greatest
extent poss i bl ·.
Runoff channelled near trees 'shall not substantially change nomal
soil moisture characteristics on a seasonal basis.
Runoff shall not be directed towards the base of trees so' that the
base of the trees remain in wet soil for an extended period.
iihe~e natural topography has been altered, drainage away frm
trunks shall be provided where necessa~l to ensure that water will
not stand at the crown.
8. Sedimentation and stltation in the drainage ways shall be.
controlled where necessa~ to avoid filling around the base of the
trees.
9. LAnd uses that wauld cause excessive soil compaction within the
1 f trees shall be avoided. Zf the areas are planned for
drip ine o
recreation, provide trails to restrict compaction tO a smalq area.
Heavy use under trees shaql be avoided unless measures to miniraze
compaction are undertaken.
Z0. Landscaping or irrigation shall not be installed within ten (10)
feet of any trees.
c. All existing native specimen trees on the subSect property shall be
h
preserved wherever feasible. Where they cannot be preserved t ey
shall be relocated or replaced with specimen trees as approved by the
Planning Director. Replacement trees shall be noted on approved
landscaping plans.
d. If any archaeological resources are uncovered: during grading or
trenchin , all activities shall cease and an archaeologist shall be
consulted. Any recommendations of the archaeologist shall be adhered
to.
All cut slopes located adjacent to 'ungraded
exceeding ten (10) feet in vertical height shall
incorporating the following grading techniques:
1)
z)
3)
natural terrain and
be contour-graded
The angle of the graded slope shall
angle of the natural terrain,
Angular forms shall be discouraged.
the natural rounded terrain.
be gradually adjusted to the
The graded'form shall reflect
The toes and tops of slopes shaql be rounded with curves with
radii designed in proportion to the total height of the slopes
where drainage and stability permit such rounding.
VESTIRG TERTATIYE TRACT R0. 73125,/~d. t2
Conditio~s of Approval
Page 7
4) Where cut or fill slopes exceed 300 feet in horizontal length, the
horizontal contours of the slope shall be curved in a continuous,
undul ating fashion,
f, Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the developer shall provide
evidence to the Director of Building and Safety that all adjacent
off-site manufactured slopes .. have recorded slope easements and that
slope maintenance responsibilities have been assigned as approved by
the Director of Building and Safety.
g. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, a qualified paleontologist
shall be retained by the developer for consultation and connent on the
proposed grading with respect to potential paleontological impacts.
Should the paleontologist find the potential is high for impact to
significant resources, a pro-grade meeting between the paleontologist
and the excavation and grading contractor shall be arranged. When
necessary, the pal eontol og i st or representative shal 1 have the
authority to temporarily divert, redirect or halt grading activity to
allow recovery of fossils.
Prior to the issuance of BUILDING PERNITS the following conditions shall
be satisfied:
a. No building permits shall be issued by the County of Riverside for any
residential lot/unit within the project boundary until the developer's
successor's-in-interest provides evidence of compliance with publ ic
facility financin measures. A cash sum of one-hundred dollars ($100)
per lot/unit shall
with the Riverside County Depar~nent
· be deposited
of Building and Safety as mitigation for public library develorrnent.
Prior to the submittal of building plans to the Department of Buildin
and Safety an acoustical study shall be performed by an acousticaV
engineer to establish appropriate mitigation measures that shall be
ap lied to individual dwelling units within the subdivision to reduce
a~J~i noise level to 45 Ldn, · '
ent interior s
c. All street lights an other outdoor lighting shall be shown on
el ectrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and Sa · y
f tf
for plan check approval and shall comply with the requirements o
Riverside County Ordinance No. 655 and the Riverside County
Comprehensive General Plan.
Prior to issuance of building permits, detailed park site and riparian
area development lens shall be submitted to the Planning Department
for approval. T~ese plans shall conform with guidelines found in the
approved design manual (Exhibit H). The park shall include active
YESTI]IG TE)ITATZYE TRACT N0.2:31.25, ,lid. ~2
roodit'ions of Approval
Page 8
fe
recreational feal~res such as picnic t~bles, barbecue areas, tot lots,
etc.
For the security and safety of future residents, the
a, Proper lighting in open areas;
b. Visibility of doors and windows
buildings;
c, Fencing heights and materials;
d. Adequate off-street parking; and
e. A clearly understood method of
emergency response.
following crime
site and building
from the street and between
street numbering to facilitate
Prior to the issuance of building permits, composite landscaping and .
irrigation plans shall be Submitted for Planning Department approval.
The plans shall address all areas and aspects ~he tract requiring
landscaping and irrigation to be installed including, but not limited
to, parkway planting, street trees, slope planting, and individual
front yard landscaping, and shall conform to the standards set forth
in the tract's approved Design Nanual (Exhibit H).
The plans shall be certified by'a landscape architect, and shall
provide for the following:
1. Permanent automatic irrigation systems shall be installed on all
landscaped areas requiring irrigation, and shall incorporate drip
irrigation wherever possible.
· Parkways and landscaped I~iiding setbacks shall I~ landscaped to
provide visual screening or a transition into the primary use area
o.f the site. Landscape elements shall include earth berming,
ground cover, shrubs and specimen trees in conjunction with
meandering sidewalks, benches and other pedestrian amenities where
appropriate as approved by the Planning Department.
Landscaping plans shall incorporate the use of specimen accent
trees at key visual focal points within the project.
Where street trees cannot be planted within right-of-way of
interior streets and project parkways due to insufficient road
right-of-way, they shall be planted outside of the road
right-of-way.
~RG TEMTAllYF' TRACT NO. 23125,
Conditions of Approval
Page 9
5. landscaping plans shall incorporate native and drought tolerant
plants ~er~ appropriate.
6. All trees shall be minimum double staked. Weaker and/or slow
growing trees shall be steel staked.
7. Front and rear yard landscaping shall incorporate the use of shade
trees.
Roof-mounted mechanical equipment shall ~ot be permitted within the
subdivision, however solar equipment or any other energy saving
devices shall be permitted with Planning Depar~ent approval.
All front yards shall be provided with landscaping and automatic
irrigation.
A plot plan shall be submitted to the Planning Oepar~ent pursuant to'
Section 18.30 of Ordinance No. 348 accompanied by all applicable
filing fees, as a plot plan that is not subject to the California
Environmental Quality Act and is not transmitted to any governmental
agency other than the Riverside County Planning Deparl=nent. The plot
plan shall ensure the conformance of the final site development with
the tract's approved Design Hanual (Exhibit !q), and shall contain the
fol 1 owing el ements-:
1. A final site plan showing the lots, building footprints, all
setbacks, fences and/or walls, and floor plan and elevation
assignments to individual lots.
2. One (1) color and materials sample board (maximum size of B X 13
inches by 3/B inch thick) containing precise color, texture and
material swatches or photographs {.which may be from suppliers;
brochures). Indicate on the board the name, address and phone
numbers of both the sample board preparer and the project
applicant, tract number, and the manufacturer and product numbers
where possible (trade names also acceptable).
3. One (1) copy of the architectural elevations colored to represent
the selected color combinations, with symbols keyed to the color
and materials board. The written color and material descriptions
shall be located on the elevation.
4. Six (6) copies of each of glossy photographic color prints (size B
X 10 inches) of both color and materials board and colored
architectural elevations for permanent filing, hearing body review
and agency distribution. All writing must be legible.
VESTING TEITATIVE TRACT MO. ~3125, Amd. #2
Conditions of Apprawal
Page 10
Said plot plan shall require the approval of the Planing Director
rior to the issuance of any buildin permits for lots included within
~he plot plan. The submittal of plot plans prior to the issuance of
building permits my be phased provided:
1. A separate plot plan shall be submitted to the Planing Oepar~ent
for each phase, which shall be accompanied by appropriate filing
fees,
2. Each individual plot plan shall be approved
Director prior to the issuance of building
included within that plot plan.
Prior to the issuance of OCCUPANCY PERMITS the following conditions
be satisfied:
a.. Wall and/or fence locations shall conform to approved site plan.
by the Planning
permits for: lots
shall
b. All landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in accordance with
approved plans prior to ,the issuance of occupancy permits. If
seasonal conditions do not permit planting, interim landscaping and
erosion control measures shall be utilized as approved by the Planning
Director and the Director of Building and Safety.
c. Prior to occupancy, bike paths shall be installed along De portola
Road and Butterfield Stage Road.
d. All landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in accordance with
approved plans and shall be verified by a Planning Department field
inspection.
e. Not withstanding the preceding conditions, wherever an acoustical
study is required for noise attenuation purposes, the heights of all
required ~mlls shall be determined by the acoustical study where
applicable.
f. Prior to occupancy, the park site and riporion enhancement area shall
be developed in accordance with approved plans.
GN:sc
g/02/88
INT~-DE~ART.g_TNTAL Mr. MOKANDUM
COCFRTY OF RIVERSIDE
Road and Survey Departmenn
.May 11, 1988
PLANNING
3: Lee johnson, Principal Engineering Technician
FRO,M= Edwin Studor, Transpor=ation Planner
RE: Tentative Tract 23125 (Sterling Ranch) - Traffic Study
We have reviewed the Traffic Study for Tentative Tract
23125, and generally agree with the analysis relative to. traffic
an8 circulation.
Based upon our review of this proposal, i= is recomended
that the following considerations be given in developing
conditions .of approval for this project.
The project proponent shall participate in the Traffic
Signal Mitigation Program as approved by the Board of
Supervisors.
Butterfield Stage R~ad and De Portola Road, adjacent to the
project, should be improved to an arterial highway (110'
foot right-of-way).
A 150 foot left turn lane pocket should be provided for
traffic on Butterfield Stage Road and De Portola desiring :o
turn left into each project entrance.
ES:AE:lg
cc: Planning Department
Subdivision file
ATTACHMENT 4
TCSD AGREEMENT
-8- pwl 3%agenda\report 041393
lionaid J, ParIts
MB.vor
Particle H, Birdsall
May~: ,:,'~
Karel F, Lf~demans
P,~J Moore
Mr. Dave Gilbert
Sterling Builders
19762 MacArthur Blvd., Suite 200
in, ins, CA 92715
SUBJECT: TRACT NUMBER 23125
Septeml3er 10, 1991
J. Sal Muftoz
Dear Mr. Gilbert:
David R Dixon
C;D/Mana,c~
(7141 ~94-1989
FAX (714! ~94-1c799
I have reviewed the proposed development of Tract No. 23125 as it reiates
to Park Land Dedication and slope maintenance and conclude with the
following:
The exterior (perimeter) slopes proposed in the aforementioned tract
may be dedicated to the TCSD by way of an irrevocable offer to
dedicate for landscape maintenance purposes, upon compliance to
existing standards as aD0roved by the TCSD, and upon completion
of the application process.
e
The proposed tract consists of 21 2 single family residential homes.
The Parkland Dedication Requirement (Quimby) is 2.75 acres or
payment of the equivalent fair market value plus 20% for off-site.
improvements.
The proposed tract has identified a 2.75 acre active park, to comply with
the required parkland dedication.
The Sterling Ranch Final Environmental Impact Report No. 263 dated March
25, 1'988 indicates that an 8 acre park will be developed. This requirement
can be found on page 11 Section (b.) Park Site. The proposed 8 acre park
site is shown on Exhibit 11-2C. and consists of a 2.75 acre active park and
a 5.25 acre wetland.
In addition to the 8 acres, approximately 10 acres of undeveloped open
space contiguous with the proposed park site, will be dedicated to the
TCSD.
The proposed 2.75 acre ac:ive park site shall be developed 1:o TCSD
s~andarc~s prior to the issuance of the 63rd building permit.
The exterior.slope maintenance areas proposed to be maintained by the
TCSD shall be properly identified on the final map.
Should you have any further questions my telephone number is (71 ~.) 694.-
6480.
Applicant or his assignee agrees
si ified below
Applicant/Signature
Very truly,
the aforementioned
Date
INc.
conditions as
CiTY
/~~~
/~,/~.C..ULA
~ment Services AdminisTrator
AMENDMENT NO. 01 TO LETTER OF AGREEMENT
DATED:SeDternber 13.1991
September 17. ! 992
The Le~er of Agreement dated September 13. 1991 between the City of Temecula,
Community Services Department (TCSD) and Current Owner of Tract No. 23125,
(hereinafter referred to as "Agreement") is herei3y amen0ed as follows:
Re: ADDITIONAL DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS
Section 1
TCSD conditions are hereby amended to include additional.requirements as follows:
Applicant shall cooperate with TCSD in providing and improving open space
trails to inter-link with proposed and/or existing trails ajoining tills property, to
TCSD standards.
A.oDlicant shall develop proposed island medians on Butteffield Stage Road, per
TCSD standards.
Sec:ion 2
All other terms and conditions of the Letter of Agreement shall remain the same.
The parties hereto have executed this Amendment on the date and year above
written.
By:
By: ,~~OF,/~~CULA
ah/L/Kin~D
ATTACHMENT 5
FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT
-9- pwl 3\agenda~,report 041393
CITY OF TEMECULA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT
TRACT MAP NO. 23125-1
DATE: Seotember 28.1993
IMPROVEMENTS
Streets and Drainage $
Water $
Sewer $
TOTAL $
FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE MATERIAL & LABOR
SECURITY SECURITY
451,500.00 $ 226,000.00
91,000.00 $ 45,500.00
96,500.00 $ 48,500.00
639,000.00 $ 320,000.00
*Maintenance Retention
$ 63.900.00
Monument Security
$ 4.212.00
DEVELOPMENT FEES
City Traffic Signing and Striping Costs
RCFCD Drainage Fee Due
Fire Mitigation Fee
Signalization Mitigation Fee - SMD #..~_
Road and Bridge Benefit Fee
Other Developer Fees
$ 0.00
$ 0.00
$ 16,800.00
$ 6.300
$ 0.00
$ 0.00
SERVICE FEES
Planning Fee
Comprehensive Transportation Plan
Plan Check Fee Due
Inspection Fee Due
Monument Inspection Fee
$ 145.00
$ 8.00
$ 2,230,00
$ 21,117,50
$ 421.00
Total Fees Due
Total Fees Paid To Date
Balance Of Fees Due
$ 23.921.50
$ 2.000.00
$ 21.921.50
· 10% Of The Total Faithful Performance Security To Be Retained For One Year
From The Acceptance Date Of The Improvements By The City.
-10- pw13~egende'~report 041393
ITEM NO. 10
APPROVAL
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Council
David Dixon
City Manager
September 28, 1993
Access to State and Local Summary Criminal History Information
PREPARED BY: Grant Yates, Human Resources Administrator
RECOMM EN DATI ON:
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
AUTHORIZING ACCESS TO SUMMARY CRIMINAL HISTORY
INFORMATION THROUGH FINGERPRINT CHECKS.
BACKGROUND:
The City feels it is necessary to conduct thorough background investigations,
including fingerprinting checks, on potential City employees. The fingerprinting will
allow the City to .gain access to an applicants criminal history information. Currently
the City is prohibited from legally obtaining this information from the State
Department of Justice.
The attached resolution and policy need to be adopted by the City Council in order for
the City to receive criminal history information uncovered through a fingerprint search.
In addition, the policy allows the City to reject an applicant for employment if that
person has been convicted of a misdemeanor involving moral turpitude or a felony
offense. The policy does allow the City Manager the authority to disregard the
conviction if mitigating circumstances exist.
In addition, a policy regulating taxi cabs in the City will be coming before the City
Council in the near future. This draft policy requires that all taxi cab drivers who are
granted a license in the City be fingerprinted to check for criminal history. This
resolution will also allow the City to receive criminal history information on these
individuals.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The cost to process the fingerprints with the State Department of Justice is $35.00
per applicant. The funds for this process are available in the Human Resources
Budget.
SUBJECT: FINGERPRINTING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PERSONNEL POLICY
Adopted:
Revised:
PURPOSE:
To facilitate the City's ability to perform complete background checks on its employees,
new City employees will .be fingerprinted and their backgrounds researched to ensure
that there is nothing which would hinder their ability to perform their job satisfactorily
or create any unnecessary liability for the City.
POLICY:
Except as otherwise hereinafter provided, no person convicted of a misdemeanor
involving moral turpitude or a felony shall be eligible for employment in the
service of the City; however, the City Manager may disregard such conviction
if he/she finds and determines that mitigating circumstances exist, such as, but
not limited to, evidence of rehabilitation, length of time elapsed since conviction,
the age of such person at the time of conviction, or the fact that the
classification applied for is unrelated to such conviction.
II.
Only the City Manager, Assistant City Manager, City Attorney, and the Human
Resources Administrator are authorized to have access to the "State Summary
Criminal History Information" as provided for in Section 11105 of the Penal Code
of the State of California.
RESOLUTION NO. 93_ ~,,
A RESOLU~ON OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA AUTHORtZING ACCESS TO SUMMARY
CRIMINAL HISTORY INFORMATION THROUGH
WHEREAS, Penal Code Sections 1110503)(10) and 1330003)(10) authorize cities, counties, and
districts to access state and local summary criminal history information for employment,
licensing, or certification purposes, and
WHEREAS, Penal Code Sections 1110503)(10) and 1330003)(10) requires that there be a
requirement or exclusion from employment, licensing, or certification based on specific criminal
conduct on the part of the subject of the record, and
WHEREAS, Penal Code Sections 1110503)(10) and 12330003)(10) require the city council,
board of supervisors, or governing body of a ~ity, county, or district to slxx:ifically authorize
access to summary criminal history information for employment, licensing, or certification
purposes.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT the City of Temecula is hereby authorized
to access summary criminal history information for employment, licensing or certification
purposes, and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT the City of Temecula shall not consider a person who
has been convicted of a felony or a misdemeanor involving moral turpitude eligible for
employment or licensing; except that such conviction may be disregarded if it is determined that
mitigating circumstances exist, or that the conviction is not related to the employment or license
in question.
ATTEST:
J. Sat Mu~oz, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
5~resos~330 I
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, HEREBY DO CERTIFY that the
foregoing Resolution No. 93-_. was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City
Council of the City of Temecula on the day of , 1993, by the following roll call
vote:
AYES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
5\resos~30 2
ITEM NO. I 1
APPROVAL ~
CITY ATTORNEY .
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
/]~Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
September 28, 1993
Vacation of a Portion of Second Street
PREPARED BY: Dennis Armstrong, Assistant Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-_
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA OF NOTICE OF INTENTION TO
VACATE A PORTION OF SECOND STREET SOUTHWESTERLY
OF FRONT STREET AND SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING
THEREON PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY PROVIDED BY
CHAPTER 3, PART 3, DIVISION 9 OF THE STREETS AND
HIGHWAYS CODE
BACKGROUND:
On March 23, 1993 the City of Temecula Planning Director approved Minor Conditional Use
Permit No. PA93-0030, Amendment No. 3. The permit is for a western dance hall to be
located in an existing 27,164 square foot building. The vacation of a portion of Second Street
is a requirement of Condition of Approval No. 37 of said Minor Conditional Use Permit
PA93-0030, Amendment No. 3.
The western dance hall, Midnight' Roundup, is currently open for business. The al~plicant
agreed to record the vacation of a portion of Second Street prior to one year from the
approval date of the permit. Staff has received property owner authorization to vacate each
portion of Second Street as depicted on the exhibits. Specifically, that portion of Second
Street to be vacated lies southwesterly of From Street and northeasterly of River Street
(Murrieta Creek), and serves as a an access to and as a portion of an existing parking area
currently being used by the western dance hall.
-1- pwOl~egdrpt~formet 082492e
The streets end highways code requires that:
Where such street rights-of-way are determined to be unnecessary for proposed or
future street usage and that the local agency or other petitioners seek to vacate said
street that a Resolution of Intention to Vacate be adopted, and that certain notices be
published and posted along the line of the street proposed to be vacated.
The publishing of notice in a newspaper of local circulation for at least two successive
weeks prior to the hearing.
The posting of notices of vacation along the line of the street proposed to be vacated
at least two weeks prior to the date set for the hearing,
The date of the hearing shall not be less than fifteen days from the adoption of this
Resolution of Intention to Vacate.
The proposed publishing dates will be the weeks of October 10-16, 1993, and October 17-23,
1993. Posting of notices is to be completed on or before October 12, 1993, and the public
hearing is to be held no earlier than October 26, 1993. Therefore, the first City Council
meeting satisfying these legal constraints is October 26, 1993.
FISCAL IMPACT=
None.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Exhibit "B"
2. Exhibit "D"
3. Exhibit "F"
-2- pwOl~egdrp~format 082492,,
RESOLUTION NO. 93-_
A ~LUTION OF THF~ CITY COUNCIL OF THE C1TY OF
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA OF NOTICE OF INTENTION TO
VACATE A PORTION OF ~ECOND STI~EET
SOUniw~TERLY OF FRONT STREET AND SETTING A
PUBLIC HEARING THEREON PURSUANT TO THE
AUTHORITY PROVIDED BY CHAFFER 3, PART 3, DIVISION 9
OF THE STl~F~ETS AND mGHWAYS CODE
NOW, Tm~~, THE CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY OF
DOES HE~y RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOIlLOWS:
Section 1: That the City Council of the City of Temecula intends to vacate
that portion of a public right-of-way in the City of Temecula, described as follows:
"That portion of that street known as Second Street extending south from the intersection with
Front Street, as shown on the map on file in the office of the City Clerk."
That said street is lawfully or officially known and reference is hereby made to the map or plan
or file in the office of the City Clerk for further particulars and to the proposed vacation of said
street that it is intended to reserve and except from the proposed vacation above referred to the
following public service easement:
Ova and upon the proposed vacation of said portion of Second Street an easement to consU'uct,
place, operate, inspect, maintain, repairo.replace, and remove such aerial and underground
public utility and public sen, ice facilities as may be necessary upon, over, and across the above
easement thereof herein vacated.
Section 2: That on the 26th day of October, 1993, at the Temecula Community
Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecuh, California at the hour of 7:00 PM, or as soon thereafter
as 'the matter may be heard, any and all persons interested in or objecting to the proposed
vacation may be heard on said question of vacation.
Section 3: The City Clerk of the City of Temecula hereby is authorized and
directed to post a *Notice of Public Hearing* in three (3) public places within the City of
Temecula within fifteen (15) days of the adoption of this resolution.
Section 4: The City Clerk of the City of Temecula hereby is authorized and
directed to post a "Notice of Public Hearing" along the street to be considered for vacation in
accordance with Chapter 3, Part 3, Division 9 of the Streets and Highways code.
5~mos~329 I
Section $: The City Clerk shall certify to the posting of "Notice of Public
Hearing" as set forth in the above sections 3 and 4.
Section 6: The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution.
PASSED, APPROVI~r~ AND ADOPTED this 28th day of September, 1993.
ATT~T:
I. Sal Mufioz, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
5Xresos~329 2
ITEM NO. 12
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works\City Engineer
September 28, 1993
Award of Contract for Pujol St. & First St. Street Widening (Project No.
PW92-09)
PREPARED BY:
Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects
Scott F. Field, City Attorney
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council:
Waive any irregularities and inform bidders in connection with the Pre-Bid conference
and site inspection, find that Highgrade Engineering, Inc. is the lowest responsible
bidder, and award a contract for Pujol St. & First St. Street Widening, Project No.
PW92-09, to for $72,595.25, and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract and;
Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency
amount of $7,259.53, which is equal to 10% of the contract amount.
BACKGROUND:
On July 13, 1993, the City Council approved the construction plans and specifications, and
authorized the Department of Public Works to solicit public construction bids· This includes
installation of curb & gutter, sidewalk, pavement and street lighting. The engineer's estimate
for this project was $80,000.
Five bids for the project were publicly opened on September 9, 1993. The bids received were
as follows:
2.
3.
4.
5.
Highgrade Engineering, Inc ..................... $72,595.25.
A. L. Chavaz Enterprises, Inc ................... $77,158.55.
Kruger-McGraw Construction Co ................. $80,448.20.
Accurate Construction, Inc ..................... $82,650.20.
Granite Construction Co ....................... $91,332.10
-1 - pwO4%egdrpt%93%0914%pw92-Og.ewd 091S
Highgrade Engineering, Inc. has not performed any work for the City but has performed well
in other areas of Riverside County based on comments from references of previous work.
The construction schedule is for 30 working days, with work expected to begin mid-October
and be completed at the end of November. ·
A copy of the bid summary is available for review in the City Engineer's office.
A bid protest has been received from the second low bidder, A.L. Chavez Enterprises, Inc.
which is described in the attached correspondence between the City, Chavez and the City
Attorney.
In summary, Chavez argues that Highgrade should be disqualified because Highgrade did not
attend the Pre-Bid Conference. The City Attorney has interpreted the Conference to be non-
mandatory, but the Associate Engineer may have stated at the Conference that the
Conference was mandatory.
In the opinion of staff, Highgrade's absence from the Conference did not effect the integrity
of the bid procedure because any ambiguities to the Project raised at the Conference were
clarified by way of written Addendum. Consequently all bidders bid' the identical project.
Section 8 of the Instruction to Bidder for the Project authorize the Council to waive
irregularities and informalities in the bid and bidding. Based upon the fact that Highgrade's
absence from the Conference did not effect the dollar amount of the bids, it is requested that
the Council waive any irregularity or informality in connection with the Pre-Bid Conference and
award the contract to Highgrade Engineering, Inc.
FISCAL IMPACT:
This project is a Capital Improvement Project and is being funded from Federal Government
with Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds. The total project amount of
$79,854.78 includes the Contract amount of $72,595.25 plus the 10% contingency of
$7,259.53. The project funds will be appropriated from account #210-165-628-5804.
Attachment:
Letter of September 9, 1993 from A.L. Chavez Enterprises, Inc. to City
Letter of September 15 and 17, 1993 from City Attorney to
A.L. Chavez Enterprises, Inc.
Letter of September 16, 1993 from A.L. Chavez Enterprises, Inc.
to City Attorney
Excerpt from Instruction to Bidder
-2- pwO4%agclrpt%93%0914~ow92-09 .awd 0915
Office
1307 W. 6th St.
Suite 136
Corona, CA 91720
\. GENERAL' ENGINEERING)
A,L, CHAUEZ
L:': .. EBITERPRISE~,,
'~,CONTRACTOR,/
Stcrte Contractors License ~8687
(909) 73,5~, FAX (999.) 738-9783
Mail
RO. Box 9
Corona, CA
91718-0009
September 9,1993
Ci~' of Te. mecula
Public Worh Dc, panment
43174 Busne.~ Park Driv~
Temecula, Ca. 92590
Re: Bid Proposal on ProjEct No.
Pujo[ St. · 1st St: Widming
Arm: Sco~ Harvey
PW92-09
Facsimile***
Ce~fiai Mail
Dear Mr. I-hrvey,
I am pror~ng today 's bid results duc to the fact tha~ at the Pr~Bid Conference, You stated that the
Pre-Bid conference was mandatory and the low bidder today is not on the list of a~endee's a~ this
confcr~c¢.
A.L Chavcz Ent~priscs,hc.
CITY OF TEMZClr~A
DEPARTHINT OF ~UBLIC WORKS
To: File
Date:
Auglls= 31, 1993 ~ 10:00 a.m.
Proje~ TitIe: Pujol S=. & Firs= S=. S~ree= Widening
PW92-09
/
nwO4~In~p~oje~s~wS2.OS~rsbid (}83~93
TOTal_ P. 83
q
1310 IBONDE:ROI.A IDItlVs'
IUiTE. I
GANARILL0, ~Atp/F~RINIA
(lOll ,ellT,,q14el
L. AW OlrlvlC::ri
.1BQQ IRIITQI. I'rNllt
IUf'TIE lakO
lelCllkC. iLf.. ¢~'14) 7111-li4.8
I1,1 Ws'l't IUtTH !I?I~L'T, IVlt~
(ll3l
1'l~l,IGOlsf[ll: (Isi] ilei-II~O0
VT,1L E~I2RYMTT.P. f, U,-q, Nn_TT.
(g0g) 735-9783
:)is. Sandra Hilton
A.L. CHAVEZ ENTERPRISES, INC.
1307 ~. 6','~ Streets Suite 136
Post O~ice Box 9
Corona, CA 91718-0009
Bid Proposal on Project No. PW 92-09
PuJol Street and First $~reet Widening
Dear Ms. Hlltonz
Your letter of September 9, 1993 regardin~ Project
No. PW92-09 has been re~erred to my oZficeZor a reaponseo
First, tlie "Instructions to Bidders" did not state the
Pre-Bid Conference was mandatory. The Instructions do not state
bidders "shall attend the Conference'~ but merely that "the
Conference shal}.[be] at" City Hall. .
Second, it is my understanding that,. ~ollowing the Pre-
Bid Conference, Xddend~m No. 1 was issued. Consequently,
although ~he apparent low bidder was not at the Pre-B~d
Conference, he bid the identical project as did your firm.
Sonetheless, iZ you believe that attendance at the
Conference caused you to submit a highe~ bidehen you would have
otherwise, please let me know the basis for your claim. If you
could provide such evidence, I will,be-pleased to discuss it with
the City En~ineer, to daterains if it may have affected the
Ms. 8andra Hilton
Sep=ember 15, · 1993
Page 2
integrity.of the bid process. As we plan on asking the City
Council ~0 award the contact on Se ~ember 28, 1993, it is
/mportant~hat If you wash to provide en/ch evidehce, it be
presented to.my office no later than September 20# 1993.
Sincerely,
IO'M~2
Scott F. Field
City Attorney.
CITY OF TEMECULA
Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer, Capital Projects
1307W. 0thSL
Suzte 136
Corona, CA 91720
GENERAL 'ENGINEERING
A.L. CHAVEZ
EI~!TERPRISES, INC-
CONTRACTOR
~ 735.5005 · FAX (909) 73~,'~783
Mail
RO, Box 9
Corona, CA
91718-0009
Sq;steaber Z6, 1993
**VTJ~ F&CB:IXZL2,*
**VIA ~u-iB~ IQtIZ,**
92-09, F~tJo1 Stree~ add
~b/s is in response ~o ~our le~er daVad 15 september, 19)3, that
was faxed to our office.
ILl;, , o .o
During the pre-bid conference, Scott Facvey v~s asked b~
b'h, eok.l~ger of Al~a~d & Puyear, Inc. ~ this conference
mandatory ~nd · prexequlaite to being able to sulmit a bid
~at ~ey wou~ ~e a 1~ of a~e~ e~gn~ a~ ~ a~nb
~ld ~eive a ~, ~h~ el~a~9 ~Y dO~ u ~ ~
~a~ ~s m~ ~ o~ O~y as ~11 as ~e ~
~e re-b~ c~fgen~ ~ ~= ~e not ~n aE~~ w~ld
~ a[[o~ o bid on ~ls pmje~.
~e ~re e~eral a~l~ i~m ~rought ~ d~
~nm for ~~1~ (~o ~l~ m~ ~e m~
~~atLen) could n~ de~iti~ly an~- Be sta~ tha~
~ ~ ~s s~on~io a~ bid aa ~- ~s ts ona rayon
Z ~ fo~ ~at ~~ w~ would ~ bi~t~ ~e Job
~e ~e-b~d, e~ ~ere f~e was ~t i~luec~ ~ ~e
~est~on as ~e the r~t of ~e
X?[4?55S648 P. ~
13,age 2
~d, h~ utim~ was ~ ~lu~ ~ b ltm ~s~sed ~
~d
~8tl~ ~ at ~e t~ of ~e ~-b aa~~ce. -
· he J~portant Lssue we are u~sutng is not so much whether our
l~ioir~ ~s influenced by :~ biddare w~ ~lv~, or vhe~
~ ~ ~ s~s ~Ob ~ ~ did, ~t the ~ ~t a ~at~ent
~s ~s by a ~prss~~ve of
hold
a ~~ ~re-r~lsl~ for ~lng
Z have t~o otb~r coAtfactors who stranded the pre-bid
~ ~ s~t~ ~ will~ese ~ set f~
w~, ~~ ~ ~g able to su~i~ x bid f~ ~s
z~ ~ls imsua Is ~t sattl~ ~ors ~e ci~ ~uncil m~ing
Sept. ~r Zs, 1~93~ ~ v21 pl~ ~o ~ ~ attendance to rep~s~
~4m a~ ~ha~ ~ime,
5andre X,. Hilkon
89-16-1993 10:3Bo, H
Da~.e: ,~a~st, 31t 1993 e 10:00 ~.~.
11192 -09.
'1"
II1, Sab-U{~na 7000 thr~Uglq 7146 of the Busing=4 end Professions Code of ~he State of
California, On the date and at The Time of aulxnil;tN of the Bidder'$ proposal, the ]xime
COntreutor shag have · CaBs8 A con~a~tor'$ tiGerBe, or a coml~naUon of ~pe~!alty Clare C
licenses sufficient to cover ell the work ~0 IX performed by him.
Bid opening will publi;ly preceed immediately following the expiration or me Time allotted
1or submitting a bid for the work,
and Site Inspection will be held on the 31st dew of August, 1093 at the
,: 8 CA 82580, Phone No. |gO6}
I~/e ,J!ing Wages: Pursuant to the Labor Code, the City has obtained from the Director of
The Department of Industrial Relations, State of C411forrda, his detem~inatkxa of general
prevailrig Teams cff per diem wages.applicable To the work, invading emDiOyot payments for
hNdth end welfare, pension, ~f; 16(41 and rimget puqtoees, as met forth on a schedule
wh;oh le on file et the offioe of the CIty Cle~ end which wI la mode ervodJal;le to any
intersated pemon upon reque~ The City slug lag dmrmbad epfdtCeble wage m for
FedNally funded contracts puturn 10 The Davis-Be;on Act, coplee of whi;h are inoluded
In ~d made · part of The centtic1: domems. The gentrector and each mubcanTr~mr ;hell
pay the higher of: .
e4
The prevailing wage rates as del:erndn~ by the Secretary of Labor ;Nmuerrt to the
provisions of the I:)avt;-I?a_~gn ~ wage demon epplloable to the p~4eot Iocatiorc
The general prevadling rate bf per diem we; se ascertained and puktldmd by the
State o1 Celitornie, Department of Industrial Relation~,
NOT~J This i~oject Ls Feelerrob finenoecl bY the U.S. Depmb,dnt of Haulrig end Urlan
Development (24 CFR, Part 67) and subjOot to cen;81n mqUiramm, inoluding payment of
Federal Ixev~ling wage, oomphnce with "Section 3" Affimmtlve Actjan Requirement&
Ex~gutivo Order tl 1248 and others. The afromentioned n descrilad in the *Speesal
Federal Provisions" section of the bid documentt AddNonat information mining to the
Federal requlmmam3 ~ on file with the t"jvemide County Eeenomio Divdopment AgenCy,
F.x=ept fat pubtic works I~oJects of Two Thousand ~ ($2.000.00) or !me, the
contractor and any eulaontra;L~m under him. shag pay not lets ~hen me general prevalgng
we0e ratse (State or Federal, whlehever is higherL m ag workera employed in t~e execution
of ~ Contrsot.
The Citlr of Tameavis barruby notl/ks ell bidders k will affirmatively ireurn met, in any
~ontraGT entered into putguam to thb advert~le,,lnz, minority ar~ womet~owned businns
irttg,~dJaei will be afforded NIl opportunity TO mJbm~ blde in raaponae tothie invitelion ~
wm not ~ d~iminmd against m the grOan(t; of mc~, color, or n~Dn~[ grlgln in
eonsTdemtlon of en ewlrd,
NOTI~ INVTTING E. DS NI-I pwol~,4t-oeWN~kt o4.o~n
I
I
I
I
$tbll"TE I
C:AldaklRIL,I,O, CAI,|FOIglkIhB~ IZOJdD
TES. ECOPeKEI: I,~OI) 4li-gl'td.
Bu'm~, Wx~uxxs & SO~SNSEN
3I:C)IO leilalliTC)~. 387Rs'Eq'
i4.11"rc 4B4Q
F.A'"'tIMU, r,. 1714,17Wl-Iid. lP
I,,0W AFTGELrl, 4=AL,,elrORNIA IOOll7
|lllal i;lloOlOO
7(t-CCC.JelEilf: (ll,~1131-17DO
Septmaber l?, 3.993
v"rA FACSTMTT.I~. & U.B. )4~,.TT,
(90g) 735-9783
Ms. Sandra Hilton
A.L. CHAVEZ ENTERPRISES, INC.
1307 W. 6th Street, Suite 136
Post Office Box 9
Corona, CA 91718-0009
Bid Proposal on Project No. PW 92-09
Pujol Street and First Street Widening
Dear Ms. Hilton:
Thank you very much for your letter of September
1993, in response to my September 15~:h letter.
In your September 16th letter, you raise two points.
First, you suggest that you based your bid, in par~:, upon who you
were bidding against. If this was the case, then how did your
apparent belief that High Grade Engineering would not be bidding
effect your own bid.
Second, you state that: "The addendum issued only
clarified whether we were to include costs for raising the Fire
Hydrant ~nd Telco risers, not all itemm discussed." However, you
do not identify w~at the other items discussed were. As I asked
you in my previous letter, I would like to know specifically what
the item are that you believe were discussed at the pre-bid
meeting that were no= covered by the addendum, which caused you
to sulnnit a higher bid.
Ms. Sandra Hilton
September 17, 1993
Page 2
wheth~ Bi ~L l~est ~alifie~ biddy, ~at I need
~e
to know fmm you is what ~idence you ~ve, if ~y, ~at indicate
~a~ High ~rade i$ not ~ali=ied to ~rfo~ ~ls proje~.
I would appreciate receiving your response no later
than the morning of September 21, 1993, so that I may present
this matter promptly to the City Council for consideration at its
meeting on September 28, 1993.
Don Spagnolo,
Sincerely,
scott F. Field
City Attorney
CITY OF TEKECULA
Principal Engineer, Capital Projects
1307 W. 6~2t.
Suite 136
Com,~, CA 9172D
A.L. CHAVEZ
ENTERPRISFS, !!MC_
CONTRACTOR ,
(90~ 735-~(X)5, FAX (909)
Mall
RO. Box9
Corona, CA
91718-0(139
Dear le~. Fteld~
**Vli FA~.~33aZ/~e
1~ 92-09, Yale1 ~set aM
This Is in response to your letter dated 17 mep~,l~:~, 1993, that
VaLE ~axed to our oZttce.
The issue ! brought fetch in previous correspondence seems to
have been ;ampletel/side stepped by yeursel..f in your reply
leCtmr xegarenoedabove,
X. L. ChmveB Ene_e~prisee, Znc,, 48 protesting the apparent low
bidder on the lasts ~ba~; "prospective bidders- were required to
a~tend a manda~ffry pre-bid conference. The other issues you have
chosen to highlight and em to want to seke more significant
than they truly are not relevant to the protes~ ~tled by ~hts
company ledlately after bid opening, as required by the "Green
Boa 8ptct~tcationsw Which govern this york.
find it hard to believe that a city attorney MOUld even dream
of asXtng ~ie oc~uy to give ~lz anti the Ctt of Tmcula
:euoas v~y J1 '.fade ~neer~n; is nob "~alt~te~. to ~r~
~o~er eo~r~or. ~i,~y, as ~ts ~t~ m ~ a
~s~i~w or eldest r~~le" bl~, ~ el~f~ quZltfi~
bierw· By n~ at~d~g b ~e-bid CO~.~ce~ HighSads
~tng ~* ~e~fore ~n-temponstve a~ ~e~ b~ ~ould M
SEP-21-93 TLjE 15:50
BWS COS TR IIF_.SR
Fn~ NO, 7147555648 P. 06
11) :L ?;L4'i"3:9'3646 P. I~
Mr, loot'l: Field
l:,age I
~egu~dJ~n~o ~ssue? ~ cho~ae o~ d~apo$tt~on
S~ ~he City o: Temscula chooses not to honor a pre-bid
adlxeI'ed f.o in good £etitll by ~hil c~n~ ~
~ ~ I~te~es o~ ~e ~hto~e ~e-bid c~~,
~e vLI1 ~ ~ h ~solv~ ~ ~e C~t~ Council at bit
a~t~ o~ le~ 22~
s~aral~,
Sandra L. ~tltcn
b.e:inaf. or
SX,atdd.~
Illlisa Miltner, Law O~ices o~ Perkins & Kiltnat
Don Iptgnclv, ~rinctpal Sngineer~ CalxLtal Projects
,_- 3. MODIFICATIONS AFTER BID OPENING
8
A modification which is received from an otherwise successful bidder and which makes the
terms of the bid more favorable to the City will be considered at anytime it is received and
may thereafter be accepted.
WITHDRAWAL OF RIDS
Bids may be withdrawn by written request received from bidders odor to the time set for
opening of bids.
INTERPRETATION OF PI ANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
Should a bidder find discrepancies in, or omissions from the Plans or Specifications, or
should he be in doubt as to their meaning, he shall at once notify the City Engineer. Should
it be found that the point in question is not clearly and fully set forth, a written Addendum
will be sent to ell persons receiving a set of documents. The City will not be responsible
for any oral instructions.
ADDENDA OR BUII ;TINS
Any Addenda or information issued during the time of bidding, or forming a part of the
documents loaned to the bidder for the preparation of his bid, shall be coverod in the bid
and shall be made a part of the Contract.
OPENING OF BIDS
Bids will be publicly opened and read, at the time and date set in the Notice Inviting Bids,
in the City Clerk's Office, City of Temecula.
AWARD OR REJECTION OF BIDS
The City reserves the right to reject any and all bids, accept or reject alternates, and waive
irregularities or informalities in the bid and bidding.
The award of the Contract, if it be awarded, will be to the lowest responsible bidder whose
proposal complies with the requirements prescribed.
All bids will be compared on the basis of the Engineer's estimate of the quantities of work
to be done:
CONTRACT BONDS
9.1
r-eneral. Before execution of the Contract by the City, the Contractor shall file with
the Engineer surety bonds satisfactory to the City in the amounts and for the
purposes noted below. Bonds shall be duly executed by a responsible corporate
surety, authorized to issue such bonds in the State of California and secured through
an authorized agent with an office in California. The Contractor shall pay all bond
premiums, costs, and incidentals.
INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDER IB-3 pwO1%pwe2-Oi~pkg 060793
ITEM NO. 13
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY A'I'i'ORNEY ~
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
,/~ Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
September 28, 1993
Contract Change Orders No. 14, and 17 through 20 for Ynez Road
Widening Project, PW92-O5, CFD 88-12
PREPARED BY: Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council approve Contract Change Orders No. 14, and 17 through 20 for
Ynez Road Widening Project, PW92-05 for labor and equipment for various items of work,
in the amount of ~76,703.33.
BACKGROUND:
During the construction of the Ynez Road Widening Project the following items of work
have resulted in a change to the contract:
Chanqe Order No. 14 (Reimbursed by Rancho California Water District)
The construction plans for this project called out to relocate an existing fire hydrant to the
back of sidewalk on the west side of Ynez Road, approximately 500' south of Motor 'Car
Parkway. During the excavation an existing 24" storm drain was in conflict with the
ultimate fire hydrant location. Therefore, e field fabrication is necessary, to maneuver the
lateral around the storm drain.
Subtotal: $1,025.64
ChanQe Order No. 17 (Partial Charge to J.F. Davidson Assoc.)
During the grading operation the design of Solana Way was modified to provide a better fit
with the existing improvements. However, the proposed changes required the contractor
to regrade areas along the south side of Solana Way.
Also, the Contractor was required to regrade areas along Ynez Road because the project
surveyors provided incorrect information.
The work listed above will be back charged to the Project Surveyor, J.F. Davidson in the
amount of $2,573.23.
pwl 5%egd~pt%93%Og28~ow92-OS 092893
The project plans required various utility companies to relocate existing facilities. Many of
these must be adjusted to the curb and gutter, therefore, curb and gutter must be
constructed prior to this work being completed. During completion of their work, the
utility companies damaged new curb and gutter in many locations. This damage resulted
in the Contractor removing and replacing portions of the new curb and gutter.
Unsuitable sub-grade material was encountered in the right turn pocket at Rancho
California Road. The Contractor was required to remove this material, install a geotextile
fabric and place additional aggregate base material based on a recommendations by the
Soils Engineer.
The work listed above will be charged to CFD 88-12 in the amount of $20,458.91
Subtotal: $23,032.14
Chanoe Order No, 18 (Reimbursed by Rancho California Water District )
Several water district facilities were encountered in the excavation of the existing road
bed, including a one 2" and three 1" air vacuum valves, and an 8" and 1 O" detector
check valve. In addition, the Contractor was also required to repair several wire test
stations which are connected to the water main that were not originally constructed to
Rancho California Water District specifications. The Contractor must adjust the elevation
of two large utility vaults near ACS which were not previously identified.
Subtotal: $19,705.95
Change Order No. 19
The Contractor was required to remove unsuitable material to complete the extension of
the box culvert on the east side of Ynez Road just northerly of Nissan of Temecula. The
unsuitable material was replaced with a mixture of rock and dry material at the direction of
the soils engineer.
Subtotal: $ 5,170.33
Chanae Order No. 20 (Reimbursed by Rancon)
The construction plans were prepared to allow for future access to property owned by
Rancon Financial. However, no design information was available for the water facilities
required to serve the site. Design information is now available to construct these facilities
along with the street widening.
Subtotal: $27,769.27
The total amount of contract changes listed above is $76,703.33, of which $51,074.09
will be reimbursed to CFD 88-12.
pwl 5%agdrpt%93%O928%pw92-O5 092893
FISCAL IMPACT:
On January 26, 1993, the City Council awarded a contract for the construction of Ynez
Road Widening form Rancho California Road to Palm Plaza, to Vance Corporation for
$2,612,811.29. Contract Change Order No.s 01 through 13, 15 and 16 were approved
for a total amount of $328,963.19. Contract Change Order No.s 14 and 16 through 20
are in the amount of $76,703.33 of which $51,074.09 will be reimbursed. Therefore, an
additional $76,703.33 must be appropriated for the Ynez Road Widening Project from CFD
88-12. There are adequate funds available in the CFD 88-12 construction account.
pwl b'~gdrpt%93~Og28%pw92-O5 092893
ITEM NO. 14
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
September 28, 1993
Community Facilities District 88-12
Reimbursement Agreements for Work Performed During the
Construction of the Ynez Road Widening Project (PW92-05)
PREPARED BY:
Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council approve a reimbursement agreement with Rancon Realty Limited
Partnership for improvements to be constructed by the City's Contractor for the Ynez
Road Widening Project PW 92-05, in the amount of $27,769.27.
BACKGROUND:
During the design of the Ynez Road Widening Project utility improvements to the adjacent
vacant property were requested. Rancon Realty Limited Partnership owns property on the
east side of Ynez Road just north of Town Center. They are requesting that certain
improvements, including water and street improvements, be constructed by the City's
Contractor, Vance Corporation, in the amount of $27,769.27
The amount to be reimbursed by Rancon Realty is based on costs provided by the Vance
Corporation and reviewed by both City staff, and Rancon representatives and found to be
acceptable.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The cost of the improvements and any other costs associated with this agreement will be
reimbursed by Rancon Realty Limited Partnership in the amount of $27,769.27.
pwl 5~agdrpt~93%0928%pwg2-OS.ewd 092893
REIMBURSEMENT AGRREMRNT
BETWEEN
CITY OF TFAVIECULA
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 88-12
YNRz ROAD WIDENING
PROJECT NO. PW 92-05
AND RANCON
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 28th day of September 1993,
is by and between the City of Temecula, a California Municipal Corporation 01ereinafter
referred to as "CITY*) representing Community Facilities District 88-12; and RANCON
REALTY 1I, a California Limited Partnership (hereinafter referred to as *RANCON').
RANCON is the owner of certain property located in CFD 88-12 at
and described as Assessors Parcel Number
In consideration of the mutual promises, covenants and conditions herein
contained, the parties hereto agree as follows:
Section 1. PURPOSE OF THE AGREEMENT. The purpose of this
Agreement is to establish the reimbursement to CITY by RANCON for the cost of
constructing certain water and street improvements in connection with the Ynez Road
Widening Project, hereinafter referred to as *PROJECT.'
Section 2. PROJECT COST. RANCON shall reimburse City for one hundred
percent (100%) of the actual costs (hereinafter referred to as "REIMB~~") for the
construction of certain water and street improvements within the PROJECT area consisting of
the following items as shown within the attached Bid schedule Spreadsheet. The
REIMBURSEMENT shall not exceed the following cost.
A. Items to be Reimbursed
Bid Amount
Bid Items 6, 80, 86, 107,
109, 110, 111, 112 & 113
$27;767.27
Costs are based on construction bid based on the items and quantities shown in
the attached bid schedule. CITY has evaluated and analyzed the bid received and selected
the VANCE CORPORATION to perform the work (hereinafter referred to as
"CONTRACTOR"). RANCON shall maintain as a contingency an amount equal to five
percent (5 % of the total estimated costs of the Project). Prior to the approval of any change
orders associated with the project, CITY shall obtain approval from RANCON before
authorizing CONTRACTOR to proceed.
Section 3. REIMBURSEMENT SCHEDULE CITY shall make payment
to CONTRACTOR for work performed. Actual costs shall be identified and billed to
RANCON for payment. RANCON shall reimburse the CITY on the following basis:
Be
Fifty percent (50%) of the estimated REIMBURSEMENT shall be due
and payable to CITY fourteen (14) days after execution of this
Agreement.
Fifty percent (50%) REIMBURSEIVm~NT to CITY by RANCON shall
be due and payable within thirty (30) days after the entire project is
accepted as complete by CITY and RANCON.
Section 4. PROJECT MANAGEMENT It is acknowledged that RANCON
has reviewed and approved the water and street improvement plans prepared by ROBERT
BEIN, WILLIAM FROST & ASSOCIATES dated 3/24/93. Management and administration
of the terms expressed herein shall be performed by CITY for the PROJECT. CITY agrees
to designate Mr. Don Spagnolo as the contact for CITY in regard to this agreement.
RANCON agrees to designate Manha Canon as a point of contact for RANCON to facilitate
the reimbursements identified herein.
Section 5. INSPECTION. CITY shall provide inspection for certain
constructed facilities, specifically, Bid Items 1 through 9 of the attached Bid 'Schedule.
RANCON shall pay all costs for inspection of Bid Items 1 through 9 provided, however, the
costs for inspection shall reasonably reflect the proportion of the REIMBURSEMENT to the
PROJECT and in no event shall the costs of inspection exceed five percent (5 % ) of the
REIMBURSEMENT. RANCON shall reimburse said inspection fees within thirty (30) days
after being invoiced by the City.
Section 6. REMF-DIER. Should RANCON fail to reimburse CITY
pursuant to the schedule set forth at Section 3 and 5 above, RANCON shall owe CITY
interest accrued monthly on the unpaid balance; interest shall be established according to the
maximum legal rate. The City may collect any monies due, plus interest, from any sales tax
reimbursement owed RANCON, pursuant to the Sales Tax Agreement between CITY and
RANCON dated
follows:
Section 7.
RANCON:
NOTICES.
All notices under this Agreement shall be sent as
CITY:
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
Either party may change its address for notices by notifying the other party.
All notices given at the most recent address specified shall be deemed to have been property
given.
This Agreement is dated as of the date set forth above.
RANCON:
RANCON, INC., a California corporation
CITY:
CITY OF ~ULA
By:
I. SAL MUNOZ, MAYOR
ATrF_,ST:
JUNE S. GREEK, CITY CLERK .
ITEM NO.
15
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY ~~
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
·
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
September 28, 1993
City Council/City Manager
Harwood T. Edvalaon, Assistant City Manager
LEASE OF SHARED YARD FACILITY FOR
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENTS
PUBLIC WORKS AND
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the attached lease agreement between Richard Gabriel and the City of Temecula, CA,
for property located at 28763 Front Street (corner of Front and 1st Street) for use as a
combined public works and community services department maintenance yard; and authorize
the Mayor to execute the agreement.
BACKGROUND:
Under the terms of its previous contract for maintenance services, the public works
department has used the proposed lease property as a maintenance yard. Now that control
of the property has reverted to the fee owner, it is appropriate that the City enter into a lease
agreement with the property owner for continued use of the land.
The proposal to continue use of the current site has several points of merit:
(1)
The joint use of the facility will remove community services storage bins from the
Sports Park, improving the aesthetics, and allowing better access to TCSD equipment
during inclement weather; and
(2)
Retaining use of the current site will eliminate an expenditure of $4,000 to relocate
existing public works equipment; and
--- (3) The existing site provides acceptable access to all parts of the City; and
(4) --,,
By parking public works and community services vehicles at the secured maintenance
yard site, vehicles are distributed away from the centralized location of City Hall, which
is an advantage for risk management purposes; and
(5)
The twelve month lease provides the City with a 30 day termination provision should
a change of location be desired within the next twelve months.
FISCAL ANALYSIS:
The lease rate for the property is $700.00 per month. The City will maintain all landscaped
areas and parkways within and adjacent to the parcel. It is anticipated that this will be a
minimal expense absorbed into the routine yard maintenance.
The lease payments will be recorded as operating expenditures in the Vehicle Internal Service
Fund.
LEASE
(28763 Front Street, Temecula)
THIS LEASE is made and entered into as of this I st day of September, 1993, by and
between RICHARD GABRIEL, hereinafter known as "LESSOR", and THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, hereinafter known as "LESSEE", is made by LESSOR and accepted by
LESSEE on each of the following conditions and terms, to wit:
1. nUIET POSSESSION: LESSOR hereby covenants that, on paying the rent
and performing the covenants herein contained, LESSEE shall and may peaceably and
quietly have, hold, and enjoy the demised premises for the agreed term.
2. DFMISED PRFMISFS: The demised premises are as follows: Unimproved
real property located at 28763 Front Street, Temecula, California and described as a
portion of Parcel I of Parcel 7475. The portion of Parcel I which constitutes the
demised premises is depicted in Exhibit "A" attached hereto.
3. USE: LESSEE may use the demised premises for any lawful purpose.
4. TERM: The term of this Lease shall be for a period of twelve (12)
months, commencing September 1, 1993. Notwithstanding the terms described
herein, LESSEE may, at any time during the term of the Lease, terminate the Lease
upon thirty (30) days prior written notice to LESSOR.
5. RENT: LESSEE agrees to and shall pay to LESSOR at 16229 Sunset
Trail, Riverside, California 92506, or such other place as LESSOR may from time to
time designate, as rent for the premises a monthly rental of $700.00 per month,
payable in advance on the first day of each and every month, commencing September
1, 1993.
6. UTILITIES: LESSEE shall pay before delinquent all charges for gas, heat,
electricity, water, sewer, power, telephone service and all other services or utilities
used in, upon, or about the demised premises by LESSEE.
7. REPAIRS: MAINTENANCE: LESSEE acknowledges that it has inspected
the demised premises and all improvements thereon and accepts the same in their
present condition. Upon termination of this Lease, or any extension thereof, LESSEE
shall, at its sole cost and expense, remove from the property all trash and debris and
shall leave the premises in their original condition or such other conditions as may
have been agreed upon by LESSOR in writing. LESSOR hereby authorizes
construction by LESSEE of a fence within the demised premises, which fence is to be
removed, at LESSOR'S election, upon the expiration or sooner termination of this
Lease. The location of the fence and gates to be constructed within the fence will be
as depicted in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. LESSEE shall not generate, store or
dispose of upon, or under the demised premises, any toxic or hazardous substances
or materials, as defined by federal, state or local statues or regulations. LESSEE will
be solely responsible for the remediation of any contamination of the demised
premises by such hazardous or toxic substances which may have occurred during any
period other than the term of this lease. LESSOR will be solely responsible for the
remediation of any contamination of the demised premises by such hazardous or toxic
substances which occurred prior to LESSEE's tenancy. LESSEE will maintain all
landscaped areas and parkways within the demised premises, and will also maintain
parkways adjacent to or included within Parcels 2 and 3 of Parcel Map 7475:
provided, however, in the event LESSOR leases parcel 2 or parcel 3, LESSEE will be
released from its obligation to maintain landscaped areas within parcel 2 or parcel 3,
whichever is leased.
8. REPAIRS: MECHANICS' LIENS: LESSEE may not proceed with any work
of construction or repair of the demised premises without first obtaining the written
consent of LESSOR.
LESSEE shall not permit to be enforced against the demised premises any
mechanics' lien or similar lien or claim arising out of construction or repairs on the
demised premises. Before the commencement of any work of construction or
improvement on the demised premises, or of any substantial repairs, alterations,
additions or restoration in or about said premises, LESSEE shall give LESSOR written
notice thereof, specifying the nature and location of the intended work and the
expected date of commencement.
LESSOR reserves the right to any time to post and maintain on said premises
such notices as may be necessary to protect LESSOR against liability for all such liens
and claims.
9. NON-LIABILITY FOR LESSOR DAMAGES: This Lease is made upon the
express condition that LESSOR is to be free from all liability and claim for damages
by reason of any injury to any person or persons including LESSEE, or property of any
kind whatsoever and to whomsoever, during the term of this Lease or any extension
thereof, or any occupancy hereunder. LESSEE hereby covenants and agrees to
indemnify and save harmless LESSOR from all liability, loss, cost or obligation on
account of or arising out of any injuries or losses however occurring during the term
of this Lease, excepting such thereof as may have been incurred by the negligence or
intentional acts of LESSOR or its agents or as otherwise provided in Paragraph 7
above. LESSOR likewise covenants and agrees to indemnify and hold harmless
LESSEE from all liability, loss, cost or obligation on account of or arising out of any
claims, injuries or losses however occurring which are unrelated to LESSEE's use and
occupancy of the premises pursuant to this Lease or which may have occurred during
any period other than the term of this Lease, excepting such thereof as may have
been incurred by the negligence or intentional acts of LESSEE or its agents or as
otherwise provided in Paragraph 7 above.
10. LIABILITY INSURANCE: At all times during the term of this Lease,
LESSEE shall keep in force at .its sole expense, public liability and property damage
insurance with respect to the leased property, which shall name the LESSOR among
those insured. The amount of coverage of the public liability and property damage
insurance shall be no less than $500,000.00 for combined single limit. LESSEE shall
deliver to LESSOR a Certificate of the insurer showing compliance with this
paragraph.
The LESSEE shall file a written request with insurance carriers to notify the
LESSOR in writing prior to any cancellation of any insurance. LESSEE agrees that if
LESSEE does not keep such insurance in full force and effect, then LESSOR may but
shall not be required to, obtain the necessary insurance and pay any premiums
thereof. Any amounts so paid shall be deemed as additional rent and shall be paid as
such on the next day upon which new rents become due.
11. ASSIGNMFNT OR SUBI FTTING: LESSEE may sublet the property to any
tenants for any purpose permitted by law, provided however that LESSEE shall notify
LESSOR of the name of each subtenant and the terms of the subtenant agreement.
LESSEE further agrees to pay as additional rent, all rent received by LESSEE from
subtenants in excess of the rent described in paragraph 5 above. Payments of
additional rent due under this paragraph shall be made within 30 days after receipt
thereof by LESSEE. Despite any subletting, LESSEE shall remain responsible to
LESSOR for all obligations under this Lease Agreement, including the cleanup
obligations provided in Paragraph 7.
12. LESSOR'S RECOVFRY ON BREACH: If the LESSEE breaches this Lease
and abandons the premises before the end of the term, or if LESSEE's right to
possession is terminated by LESSOR because of LESSEE's breach hereof, LESSOR
shall have the rights as outlined in Civil Code Section 1951.4 and further shall be
entitled to recover all lost rent for the balance of the term of this Lease as provided
in Civil Code Section 1951.4(a)(3), or LESSOR may, at Lessor's option continue the
Lease as provided in the next paragraph below.
13. CONTINUATION OF LEASE AFTER BRANCH: Even though LESSEE has
breached this Lease and abandoned the premises, the Lease shall, at the option of
LESSOR, continue in effect for so long as the LESSOR does not terminate the
LESSEE's right to possession, and the LESSOR may enforce all his rights and remedies
under the Lease, including the right to recover the rent as it becomes due under this
Lease. For the purpose of this paragraph, LESSOR's acts of maintenance or
preservation, efforts to relet the premises or appointment of a receiver to protect
LESSOR's interest under the Lease shall not constitute a termination of LESSEE's right
to possession.
14. INSOLVENCY OF LESSEE: LESSEE agrees that in the event all or
substantially all of its assets be placed in the hands of a receiver or trustee, and in the
event such receivership of trusteeship continues for a period of ten (10) days, or
should LESSEE make an assignment for the benefit of creditors or be adjudicated a
bankrupt, or should LESSEE institute any proceedings under any state or federal
bankruptcy act wherein LESSEE seeks to be adjudicated a bankrupt, or seeks to be
discharged of its debts, or should any involuntary proceeding be filed against such
LESSEE under such bankruptcy laws and LESSEE consents thereto or acquiesces
therein by pleading or default, than this Lease or any interest in and to the demised
premises shall not become an asset in any such proceedings, and, in any of such
events and in addition to any and all rights or remedies of LESSOR hereunder or as
provided by law, it shall be lawful for LESSOR at his option to declare the term hereof
ended and to re-enter the demised premises and take possession thereof and remove
all persons therefrom and LESSEE shall have no further claim therein or thereunder.
15. HOLDING OVER: Any holding over after the expiration of the term of this
Lease or sooner termination hereof, with the express or implied consent of LESSOR,
shall be construed to be a tenancy only from month to month, and LESSEE shall pay
the monthly rent provided hereunder and shall otherwise be on the terms and
conditions herein specified, so far as applicable.
16. CONDEMNATION: The parties acknowledge that independent of this
Lease, LESSEE may elect to widen the cul de sac which is adjacent to the demised
premises and to construct a bridge at the end of such cul de sac. Any condemnation
award resulting from such street widening and bridge construction or from any other
eminent domain proceeding affecting the demised premises will be payable solely to
LESSOR and LESSEE will assert no interest in any such condemnation proceeds. The
parties further acknowledge that in the event of any such condemnation, the leased
premises will be valued without regard for this Lease and the rents payable hereunder,
it being understood that such rents are less than the fair rental value of such property.
In the event that as a result of this Lease, LESSOR or the demised premises are
subjected to land use approval requirements (zoning, plot plans or similar matters), as
a result of which the City of Temecula or any other governmental entity having
jurisdiction over the demised premises requires exactions or dedications as a condition
of approval, LESSOR may elect to cancel and terminate this Lease rather than
proceeding with such land use approvals, exactions and/or dedications.
17. PARTIAL INVALIDITY: If any term, covenant condition or provision of
this Lease is held by a Court of competent 'jurisdiction to be invalid, void or
unenforceable, the remainder of the provisions hereof shall remain in full force and
effect and shall in no way be affected, impaired, or invalidated thereof.
18. SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST: This Lease and each and every covenant
herein contained shall, subject to the provisions as to assignment, apply to and bind
the heirs, successors, executors, administrators and assigns all parties hereto; and all
of the parties hereto shall be jointly and severally liable hereunder. No amendment,
addition, revision, or abrogation of the Lease shall be valid unless it is in writing duly
subscribed by the parties hereto.
19. LESSOR'$ ENTRY: LESSEE shall permit LESSOR and LESSOR's agent
to enter onto said premises at a reasonable time, or by appointment, for the purpose
of inspection, or for the purpose of making repairs or alterations.
20. SUBORDINATION/ATI'ORNMENT: If a lender requires that this Lease be
subordinated to any encumbrance against the demised premises, this Lease shall be
subordinated to such encumbrance provided the lender first agrees that in the event
of foreclosure title shall be taken or conveyed subject to the terms of this Lease.
LESSEE shall attorn to any purchasers at foreclosure sale, or to any grantee by deed
in lieu of foreclosure. LESSEE agrees to execute any written documents reasonably
required by a lender to accomplish the purposes of this paragraph.
21. REMEDIES CUMULATIVE: The rights and remedies of LESSOR shall
include those set forth herein and those conferred by law. Such rights and remedies
shall be cumulative to the fullest extent permitted by law.
22. HEADINGS, INTERPRETATIONS: The headings of sections herein are for
convenience only and shall not affect the meaning or interpretation of the contents
hereof. Whenever the context herein so require, the masculine gender includes the
feminine and/or neuter gender and the singular number includes the plural.
23. NOTICES: Any notice under this Lease must be in writing and may be
either served personally upon recipient or to the addresses specified below. Either
party may change such address from time to time by written notice to the other.
Notices so mailed shall be deemed delivered at the expiration of the second day after
date of mailing.
24. ATTORNEY'S FEES: In the event of litigation between the parties arising
out of this Lease, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover reasonable attorney's
fees and costs of suit.
25. ENTIRE AGREEMENT: This Lease contains the entire Agreement of the
parties, and there are no Agreements either written or oral, other than as herein
stated. This Lease may be amended only by a written Agreement signed by the
parties hereto, or their successors in interest.
LESSEE: LESSEE:
RICHARD GABRIEL
THE CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
ADDRESS OF LESSOR:
ADDRESS OF LESSEE:
16229 Sunset Trial
Riverside, CA 92506
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92390
ITEM 16
APPROVAT.
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
RECOMMENDATION:
City Manager/City Council
Mary Jane McLarney, Finance Officer
September 28, 1993
Resolution to amend the Expenditure of Tax Increment Funds of the
Redevelopment Agency for Construction of e Senior Center
That the City Council adopt the following resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING THE EXPENDITURE OF TAX INCREMENT
FUNDS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF A SENIOR CITIZEN CENTER IN A
REDEVELOPMENT AREA.
DISCUSSION: In order to use Redevelopment Agency (RDA) tax increment to
finance the Senior Center and in accordance with Health and Safety Code Section 33679 it
is necessary to conduct a public hearing and make the following findings:
That the buildings, facilities, structures, or other improvements are of benefit to the
project area, or the immediate neighborhood in which the project is located, regardless
of where the improvement is within another project area, or in the case of a project
area in which substantially ell of the land is publicly owned, that the improvement is
a benefit to an adjacent project area of the agency.
That no other reasonable means of financing such buildings, facilities, structures, or
other improvements are available to the community (Health and Safety Code Section
33445).
The Senior Center will provide a facility for the use of senior residents of the Redevelopment
Area which is presently unavailable to them. Its funding will come partially from Community
Development Block Grant funds, however these funds are insufficient to finance the total cost
IL. WOJrTONI,,tA GEND45'L~C2E A GN
of construction of the Center. No other funds are available to the City for this purpose. It is
therefore necessary to commit tax increment funds if the center is to be build. The
Redevelopment Plan authorizes construction of Public Facilities in the Redevelopment Area.
The Council previously authorized an expenditure of up to $1,000,000 with RDA funds for
the Senior Center. Due to an increase in the construction cost, it is necessary to increase the
level of RDA funding to $1,500,000.
The expenditure has been reviewed and approved by the Old Town RDA Advisory Committee.
Attachment: Resolution No. 93-
~-- RESOL~ON NO. 93-__
A I~E~OLUTION OF THF~ CITY COlINCH, OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE EXPENDITURE OF TAX
INCREMENT F[JNDS OF THE liRBEVELOPMENT
AGENCY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A SENIOR
CITIZEN CENTER IN A REDEVT~T~GPlV~NT ~.A.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE
AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1.
and declares as follows:
The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby finds, determines
A. The City of Temecula is constructing a senior center located on a 2.75 acre site,
northeast of the center line of Mercedes Street, in Redevelopment Project No. 1-1988
redevelopment area. The Temecula Redevelopment Agency will be financing one million, five
hundred thousand dollars ($1,500,000) of the cost of the project from the proceeds of
redevelopment bends, which it has issued, the debt service on which will be paid from tax
increment funds received by the Agency;
B. The Senior Center and all of the associated improvements being constructed
regarding the center are of benefit to the project area in that they will provide an essential
service to the residents of the area not presently available and provide an aesthetic improvement
C. No other reasonable means of financing the pro~sed senior center are available,
and if tax increment funds are not used to help finance the cost of construction, available funds
will be insufficient to complete the project;
D. The redevelopment plan for Redevelopment Project No. 1-1988 redevelopment
area provides for the installation and construction of public facilities which benefit the area;
E. A public hearing in substantial compliance with the requirements of California
Health and Safety Code Section 33679 has been held, a notice has been published in a newspaper
of general circulation in the community for at least two successive wceks prior to the Public
Hearing.
Section 2. Based upon the foregoing, the City Council of the City of Temecula
hereby determines that the senior center is necessary for the benefit of the Redevelopment
Project No. 1-1988 redevelopmerit area and that the proposed contribution to its financing is the
only reasonable means available to insure its completion. The City Council does hereby approve
contribution of one million, five hundred thousand dollars ($1,500,000) of tax increment funding
to construction of a senior center in the Redevelopment Project No. 1-1988 redevelopmerit area.
Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution.
APPROVED AND ADO~ this day of __., 1993.
ATTEST:
J. Sal Mufioz, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAl]
STATE OF CALIFO~)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA)
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that
the foregoing Resolution 93_ was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the
City of Temecula on the _ day of__., 1993, by the following roll call vote:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCH,MEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
ITEM
TO:
FROM:
DATE;
SUBJECT:
APPROV~
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER ~/
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Gary Thornhill, Director of Planninl~~
September 28, 1993
Appeal of Planning Commission Approval of PA93-0009, Tentative Parcel Map
No. 25059, First Extension of Time and PA93-0010, Plot Plan No. 34, First
Extension of Time
Prepared by: Craig D.Ruiz, Assistant Planner
RECOMMENDATION: It is requested that the City Council:
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 93-0009, FIRST EXTENSION OF
TIME FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 25059 TO SUBDIVIDE A 5.51 ACRE
PARCEL INTO 4 PARCELS LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF RIDGE PARK
DRIVE APPROXIMATELY 70 FEET SOUTH OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD
AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 945-130-0003
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 93-0010, FIRST EXTENSION OF
TIME FOR PLOT PLAN NO. 34 TO CONSTRUCT A 102,243 SQUARE FOOT
OFFICE BUILDING, A 7,872 SQUARE FOOT RESTAURANT, A 7,000 SQUARE
FOOT RESTAURANT AND A FOUR LEVEL PARKING STRUCTURE ON A 5.51
ACRE PARCEL LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF RIDGE PARK DRIVE
APPROXIMATELY 70 FEET SOUTH OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AND
KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 945-130-003 '
BACKGROUND
On January 15, 1991, the Temecula City Council approved the above referenced projects.
On October 7, 1991, the City of Temecula Planning Commission approved a Minor Change
application for Tentative Parcel Map 25059.
R:%S~"TAFFRPT%OPA93.CC 9120/93 vgw
The first extension of time for these two items as heard at the July 19, 1993 Planning
Commission meeting. The Commission continued the item to the August 2, 1993
Commission meeting and directed staff to clarify issues raised by the applicant regarding the
addition of new conditions of approval and the length of the extension of time.
DISCUSSION
New Conditions of ADoroval
The applicant feels that staff does not have the authority to add any new conditions of
approval. The applicant believes the added conditions are not related to health and safety
issues. Also, the applicant feels that because the City has not adopted the Draft General Plan,
the project does not need to be consistent with the Draft General Plan.
Specifically, the applicant objects to conditions number 3 through number 22. These new
conditions are all standard conditions of approval. The new conditions relate to new City and
Federal standards for grading, erosion control, National Pollutant Discharge Emission System
(NPDES) and the Western Bypass Corridor road.
The Public Works staff has recommended that the approval of the extension be subject to
additional conditions as presented to the Planning Commission at the July 19, 1993 hearing
in compliance with the City's current standards and as required to protect the general health
and safety of the community. Also, the Assistant City Attorney stated at the August 2, 1993
meeting that the City does indeed have the ability to add new conditions of approval to a
previously approved project. The Assistant City Attorney also stated that State law requires
the project to be in compliance with the Draft General Plan in the absence of an adopted
General Plan.
LenQth of Extension of Time
At the July 19, 1993 meeting, the applicant stated that, because the project is conditioned
to provide for offsite improvements in an amount in excess of $100,000, an automatic three
year extension should be granted as allowed by the Subdivision Map Act.
However, Section 66452.6 of the Subdivision Map Act specifies that: "if the subdivider is
required to expend one hundred twenty-five thousand dollars ($125,000) or more to
construct, improve, or finance the construction or improvement of public improvements
outside the property boundaries of the tentative map, excluding improvements of public rights-
of-way which abut the boundary of the property to be subdivided and which are reasonably
related to the development of that property, each filing of a final map shall extend the
expiration of the approved or conditionally approved tentative map by 36 months from the
date of its expiration or the date of the previously filed final map, whichever is later."
R:~.S'~STAFFRFl'%gPA93.CC 9122/93 vgw 2
To date, the applicant has not met any of the following requirements for a three year
extension of time:
1. The filing of a final map
2. The filing of multiple final maps as part of a phased project
3. The expenditure of $125,000
If the applicant meets the above requirements at the time of the filing of the final map, the
three year extension may be granted at that time. At this stage of the approval process, the
applicant's request for the three year extension is inapplicable.
Attachments:
2.
3.
4.
5.
Resolution 93- - Page 4
Resolution 93- - Page 9
Conditions of Approval - Page 14
Previously Adopted Conditions of Approval - Page 15
July 19, 1993 and August 2, 1993 Planning Commission Staff
Reports - Page 16
July 19, 1993 and August 2, 1993 Planning Commission
Minutes - Page 17
Exhibits - Page 'l 8
A. Vicinity Map
R:%S%STAFFRFT%IaA93.CC 9/22/93 vgw 3
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
RESOLUTION NO. 93-_
R:%S%STAFFFFr%gPA93.CC 8120/93 vgw 4
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 93-
0009, FIRST EXTENSION OF TIME FOR TENTATIVE TRACT
MAP 25059 TO SUBDIVIDE A 5.51 ACRE PARCEL LOCATED ON
THE WEST SIDE OF RIDGE PARK DRIVE APPROXIMATELY 70
FEET SOUTH OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AND KNOWN AS
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 945-130-0003
WHEREAS, Preferred Equities Development, Inc. filed a Planning Application No 93-
0009, First Extension of Time for Tentative Parcel Map No. 25059 in accordance with the
Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning end Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has
adopted by reference;
WHEREAS, said Extension of Time application was processed in the time and manner
prescribed by State end local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered said Extension of Time on June 19,
1993, and August 2, 1993, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify
either in support or opposition;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, the Commission approved
said Extension of Time;
WHEREAS, Preferred Equities Development, Inc. filed an Appeal of the Planning
Commission's decision to approve Planning Application No. 93-0009, First Extension of Time
for Tentative Parcel Map No. 25059 in accordance with the Riverside County Land Use,
Zoning, Planning and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference;
WHEREAS, said Appeal application was processed in the time and manner prescribed
by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a public hearing pertaining to said Appeal on
September 28, 1993, at which time interested persons had opportunity to testify either in
support or opposition to said Appeal; and
WHEREAS, the City Council received a copy of the Staff Report regarding the
.Extension of Time;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE,
DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Findings. That the Temecula City Council hereby makes the following
findings:
R:%S~,STAFFFIPT~ePA93.CC 9120/93 ' vgw 5
A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly incorporated city shall
adopt a general plan within thirty (30) months following incorporation. During that 30-month
period of time, the city is not subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or the
requirements of state law that its decisions be consistent with the general plan, if all of the
following requirements are met:
general plan·
The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of the
2. The planning agency finds, in approving projects and taking other
actions, including the issuance of building permits, each of the following:
a. There is a reasonable probability that the land use or action
proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or
which will be studied within a reasonable time.
b. There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or
interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately
inconsistent with the plan·
c. The proposed use or action complied with all other applicable
requirements of state law and local ordinances.
B. The Riverside County General Plan, as amended by the Southwest Area
Community Plan, (hereinafter "SWAP") was adopted prior to the incorporation of Temecula
as the General Plan for the southwest portion of Riverside County, including the area now
within the boundaries of the City. At this time, the City has adopted SWAP as its General
Plan guidelines while the City is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of its
General Plan.
C. The proposed Subdivision is consistent with the SWAP and meets the
requirements set forth in Section 65360 of the Government Code, to wit:
general plan.
The City is proceeding in a timely fashion with a preparation of the
2. The City Council finds, in approving projects and taking other actions,
including the issuance of building permits, pursuant to this title, each of the following:
a. There is reasonable probability that Planning Application No. 93-
0009, First Extension of Time for Tentative Parcel No. 25059 as proposed will be consistent
with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which will be studied within a
reasonable time.
b. There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or
interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately
inconsistent with the plan.
c. The proposed use or action complies with all other applicable
requirements of state law and local ordinances.
R:%S%STAFFRPT~gPA93.CC 9120/93 vgw 6
D. The City Council, in approving Planning Application No. 93-0009, makes the
following findings, to wit:
1. There is a reasonable probability that Tentative Parcel Map No. 25059
will be consistent with the City's future General Plan, which will be completed in a reasonable
time and in accordance with State Law. The project, as conditioned, conforms with existing
applicable city zoning ordinances and development standards. Furthermore, the proposed
office/commercial development is consistent .with the is consistent with the future General
Plan Land Use Designation of Business Park.
2. There is not a likely probability of substantial detriment to, or interference
with the City's future General Plan, if the proposed use is ultimately inconsistent with the
Plan, since the surrounding land uses are proposed to be commercial and business park.
3. The proposed use or action as conditioned complies with State planning
and zoning laws, local Ordinance Nos. 348 and 460; and California Governmental Code
Sections 65000-66009 (Planning and Zoning Law).
4. The project as designed and conditioned will not adversely affect the
public health or welfare since all impacts have been mitigated to a level of insignificance.
6. The project as designed and conditionod will not adversely affect the
built or natural environment as determined in Negative Declaration, and the conditions of
approval for this project.
7. Said Findings are supported by minutes, maps, exhibits and
environmental documents associated with this application and heroin incorporated by
reference, due to the fact that they are referenced in the attached Staff Report, Exhibits,
Environmental Impact Report, and Conditions of Approval.
E. As conditioned pursuant to Section 3, the Plot Plan proposed conforms to the
logical development of its proposed site, and is compatible with the present and future
development of the surrounding property.
Section 2. Environmental Comoliance. Adoption of the previously adopted Negative
Declaration for Tentative Parcel Map No. 25059 is recommended.
Section 3o Conditions. That the City of Temecula City Council hereby recommends
approval of Planning Application No. 93-0009, First Extension of Time for Tentative Parcel
Map No. 25059 to subdivide a 5.51 acre parcel into 4 parcels.
A. Attachment No. 3, attached hereto.'
Section 4. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution.
R:~STAFFRFT~PA93.CC 8120f83 vgw 7
Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 28th day of September, 1993.
J. SAL MU~iOZ
MAYOR
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA)
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council
of the City of Temecula at · regular meeting thereof, held on the 28th day of September,
1993 by the following vote of the Council:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
JUNE S. GREEK
CITY CLERK
R:~S~STAFFRPT~gPA93.CC 9120/93 vgw 8
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
RESOLUTION NO. 93-_
R:~q~q'I'AFFFIPT%gPA93.CC 9/20/83 vgw 9
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 93-
0010, FIRST EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLOT PLAN NO. 34 TO
CONSTRUCT A 102,243 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE BUILDING, A
7,872 SQUARE FOOT RESTAURANT, A 7,000 SQUARE FOOT
RESTAURANT AND A FOUR LEVEL PARKING STRUCTURE ON
A 5.51 ACRE PARCEL LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF RIDGE
PARK DRIVE APPROXIMATELY 70 FEET SOUTH OF RANCHO
CALIFORNIA ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.
945-130-0003
WHEREAS, Preferred Equities Development, Inc. filed an Planning Application No 93-
0010, for a First Extension of Time for Plot Plan No. 34 in accordance with the Riverside
County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted
by reference;
WHEREAS, said Extension of Time application was processed in the time and manner
prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered said Extension of Time on June 19,
1993, and August 2, 1993, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify
either in support or opposition;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, the Commission approved
said Extension of Time;
WHEREAS, Preferred Equities Development, Inc. filed an Appeal of the Planning
Commission's decision to approve Planning Application No. 93-0010, First Extension of Time
for Plot Plan No. 34 in accordance with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning end
Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference;
WHEREAS, said Appeal application was processed in the time and manner prescribed
by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a public hearing pertaining to said Appeal on
September 28, 1993, at which time interested persons had opportunity to testify either in
· support or opposition to said Appeal; and
WHEREAS, the City Council received e copy of the Staff Report regarding the
Extension of Time;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE,
DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
R:%S%STAFFFFr~gPA93.CC 9120/93 vgw 10
Section 1. Findings. That the Temecula City Council hereby makes the following
findings:
A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly incorporated city shall
adopt a general plan within thirty (30) months following incorporation· During that 30-month
period of time, the city is not subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or the
requirements of state law that its decisions be consistent with the general plan, if all of the
following requirements are met:
1. The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of the
general plan.
2. The planning agency finds, in approving projects and taking other
actions, including the issuance of building permits, each of the following:
a. There is a reasonable probability that the land use or action
proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or
which will be studied within a reasonable time.
b. There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or
interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately
inconsistent with the plan·
c. The proposed use or action complied with all other applicable
requirements of state law and local ordinances.
B. The Riverside County General Ran, as amended by the Southwest Area
Community Plan, (hereinafter "SWAP")was adopted prior to the incorporation of Temecula
as the General Plan for the southwest portion of Riverside County, including the area now
within the boundaries of the City. At this time, the City has adopted SWAP as its General
Plan guidelines while the City is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of its
General Plan.
C. The proposed application is consistent with the SWAP and meets the
requirements set forth in Section 65360 of the Government Code, to wit:
general plan.
The City is proceeding in a timely fashion with a preparation of the
2. The City Council finds, in recommending approval of projects and taking
other actions, including the issuance of building permits, pursuant to this title, each of the
following:
a. There is reasonable probability that the said application will be
consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which will be studied
within a reasonable time since the project is cons!stent with the existing SWAP and zoning
designation.
b. There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or
interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately
inconsistent with the plan since the project is compatible with surrounding development.
R:%St, STAFFRFT%gPA83.CC 9120/93 vgw 11
c. The proposed use or action complies with all other applicable
requirements of state law and local ordinances since it complies with Ordinance No. 348.
D. Pursuant to Section 18.30(c), no plot plan may be approved unless the
following findings can be made:
1. The proposed use must conform to all the General Plan requirements and
with all applicable requirements of state law and City ordinances.
public health,
is compatible
2. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the
safety and general welfare; conforms to the logical development of the land and
with the present and future logical development of the surrounding property.
E. The City Council, in recommending approval of the proposed Plot Plan, makes
the following findings, to wit:
1. There is a reasonable probability that PA93-0010, First Extension of Time
for Plot Plan No 34, will likely be consistent with the City's future General Plan, which will
be completed in a reasonable time and in accordance with State Law due to the fact that the
proposed commercial/office buildings are consistent with the existing Industrial Park zoning
and the Draft General Plan Land Use Designation of Business Park.
2. This project is consistent with the Southwest Area Plan (SWAP) since
it is designated as Restricted Light Industrial on the plan.
3. This project is consistent with the Industrial Park zone since it meets all
the requirements for this zone.
4. This project will not have a significant impact on the environment since
all the impacts have been mitigated to a level of insignificance.
5. The proposed project is suitable for the site since it accommodates all
the structures, the necessary parking, landscaping and circulation for the site.
F. As conditioned pursuant to Section 3, the Plot Plan as proposed conforms to
the logical development of its proposed site, and is compatible with the present and future
development of the surrounding property.
Section 2. Environmental Comoliance. Adoption of the previously adopted Negative
Declaration for PI0t Plan No. 34 is recommended.
Section 3. Conditions. That the City of Temecula City Council hereby approves
Planning Application No. 93-0010, First Extension of Time for Plot Plan 34 to construct a
102,243 square foot office building, a 7,872 square foot restaurant, a 7,000 square foot
restaurant and a four level parking structure on a 5.51 acre parcel located on the west side
of Ridge Park Drive approximately 70 feet south of Ranch California Road and known as
Assessor's Parcel No. 945-130-003 subject to the following conditions:
A. Attachment No. 2, attached hereto.
R:~S~STAFFRIrI~PA93.CC 9120/93 yew 12
Section 4. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 28th day of September, 1993.
J. SAL MUROZ
MAYOR
ATTEST:
June So Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA)
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council
of the City of Temecula at · regular meeting thereof, held on the 28th day of September,
1993 by the following vote of the Council:
AYES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
JUNE S. GREEK
CITY CLERK
R:%S~T'AFFRFT%gPA93.CC 8120/93 vgw 13
ATTACHMENT NO. 3'
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
R:%S%STAFFRPT~gPA93.CC 9120/93 vgw 14
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Tentative Parcel Map No. 25059
Project Description: First one-year extension of time for Tentative Parcel Map
No. 25009, a subdivision 5.51 acres into 4 parcels.
Assessor's Parcel No.: 945-130-003
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
Tentative Parcel Map No. 25059, First Extension of Time shall comply with all
Conditions of Approval for Tentative Map No. 25059 (copies of which are attached)
unless superseded by these Conditions of Approval.
The tentative subdivision shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act
and to all the requirements of Ordinance 460, unless modified by the conditions listed
below. A time extension may be approved in accordance with the State Map Act and
City Ordinance, upon written request, if made 30 days prior to the expiration date·
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
The Developer shall comply with all the Condition of Approval set for the Tentative Parcel Map
25059 as approved by the City of Temecula City Council on January 15, 1991. The following
are the Department of Public Works additional Conditions of Approval for this project, and
shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All questions regarding the true
meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the appropriate staff person of the Department
of Public Works.
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
A Grading Permit for precise (including all on-site flat work and improvements) grading
shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any
construction outside of the City-maintained road right-of-way.
An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior
to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City
right-of-way.
All improvement plans, grading plans, landscape and irrigation plans shall be
coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements
contiguous to the site.
R:~S~STAFFRFT~gPA93.PC 7112/93 klb 5
PRIOR
7.
10.
11.
12.
13.
PRIOR
14.
15.
16.
Pursuant to Section 66493 of the Subdivision Map Act, any subdivision which is part
of an existing Assessment District must comply with the requirements of said section.
TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS
The final grading plan shall be prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer and shall be
reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works.
The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board.
No grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or
the project is shown to be exempt.
A Soils Report shall be prepared by a registered Soils Engineer and submitted to the
Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall
address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the
construction of engineered structures and pavement sections.
An erosion control plan in accordance with the City Standards shall be prepared by a
registered Civil Engineer and submitted to the. Department of Public Works for review
and approval.
Graded but undeveloped land shall be maintained in a weed free condition and shall be
either planted with interim landscaping or provided with other erosion control measures
as approved by the Department of Public Works.
The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading
and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and
subject to approval by the Department of Public Works.
A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the prevailing Area
Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new development. The charge is
payable to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District prior
to issuance 'of any permit. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has
already been credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid.
TO RECORDATION OF FINAL MAP
Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid.
The Developer shall construct or post security and enter into an agreement
guaranteeing the construction of the following public/private improvements within 18
months in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the
Department of Public Works,
A. Erosion control and slope protection.
The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an
Environmental Constraint Sheet recorded with any underlying maps related to the
subject property.
R:\S~STAFFRPT~gPAS3,PC 7112193 klb 6
17.
18.
The Developer shall notify the City's cable 'iV franchises of the Intent to Develop.
Conduit shall be installed to cable TV standards.
The DevelolSer shall record a written offer to participate in, and waive all rights to
obiect to the formation of an Assessment District, a Community Facilities District, or
a Bridge and Major Thoroughfare Fee District for the construction of the proposed
"Western Bypass Corridor." The form of the offer shall be subject to the approval of
the City Engineer and City Attorney.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS
19.
A Transportation Demand Management Program will be required if there is a potential
for more than 100 people to be employed at this site.
20.
A precise grading plan shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review
and approval. The building pad shall be certified by a registered Civil Engineer for
location and elevation, and the Soils Engineer shall issue a Final Soils Report addressing
compaction and site conditions.
21.
Grading of the subiect property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code,
the approved grading plan, the conditions of the grading permit, City Grading
Standards and accepted grading construction practices. The final grading plan shall
be in substantial conformance with the approved rough grading plan.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY
22.
All existing improvements damaged or broken due to the construction of this proiect
shall be repaired or removed and replaced as directed by the Department of Public
Works per current City Standards.
R:\S',STAFFRFT~PA93.PC 7112/93 Idb 7
TO:
FROM:
RE:
County of Riverside
CITY OF TEMECULA
ATTN: Craig Ruiz
DATE:
HEALTH SERVICES AGENCY
GREG DELLENBACH, Environmental Health Specialist IV
PLOT PLAN NO. 34, 1ST EXTENSION OF TIME (PA-93-0010)
RECEIVED
FEB 0 8 L
........
The Department of Environmental Health has reviewed Case No.
PA93-0010, 1st Extension of Time for Plot plan No. 34.
Our comments of 10,09-9- will remain as stated with the
change in name for the contact person in Hazardous Materials
to Mike Daly.
We have no objections to extending this Plot Plan.
GD:dr
DOI,¢-GA-O02 (Re,, 4/92)
Ciif' of Temecula
Plannidg Department
RECEIVED
DEVELOPlVng~NT REVIEVt CO1VllVllrfb-~:
PROIECT TRANSMITTAL
FEB 18 1993
hn5 'd .............
The attached project has been scheduled for the Development Review Committee Meeting
of February 4, 1993.
Your written comments or attendance is requested. Please transmit written comments prior
to February 1. 1993.
The me~ting will bc held at:
City of Tcmccula
planning Department
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
If you have any questions r~garding this project, please contact Craig Ruiz at (909) 694-6400.
Project Tnformation:
Case No.:
PA93-0010, 1st Extension of Time for Plot Plan No. 34
Applicant:
Proposal:
Location:
Intended
Environmental Action:
A.P.N.:
Case Planner:
Status:
CorillTlents:
Preferred Equities
A proposed 276,000 square foot offxce/restaurant development of
5.5 acres.
West side of Ridge Park Drive, south of Rancho C~Iifomia
Road
Re-certify previously adopted Negative Declaration
940-310-033,034, 037
Craig Ruiz
X. New Project
Resubmittal: Previous DRC Date:
~ project was fLrSt approved January 15, 1991.
The Riverside County Fire Department recommends
approvalon the extension of time on PP 34 PA
93-0010. Please refer to the original letter
of condition dated 10/09/90.
R:%SXDRC'~10PA93.TR.N 1/21193 Idb
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
PA93-0010, Plot Plan No. 34, First One Year Extension of Time
Project Description: A request for a one year time extension for Plot Plan No. 34, a
seven (7) story office building totaling 102,243 square feet, a 7,872 square foot
restaurant, a four (4) level parking structure containing 134,933 square feet, and a
building pad for a proposed 7,000 square foot restaurant on 5.51 acre site.
Assessor's Parcel No.: 945-130-003
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
PA93-0010, Plot Plan No. 34, First Extension of Time shall comply with all previous
Conditions of Approval for Tentative Map No. 25059 (copies of which are attached)
unless superseded by these Conditions of Approval·
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
The following are the Department of Public Works additional Conditions of Approval for this
project, and shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency· All questions
regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the appropriate staff person
of the Department of Public Works.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS:
e
The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board.
No grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or
the project is shown to be exempt·
Permanent landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to the Planning
Department and the Department of Public Works for review.
The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading
and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and
subject to approval by the Department of Public Works.
.Graded but undeveloped land shall be maintained in a weedfree condition and shall be
either planted with interim landscaping or provided with other erosion control measures
as approved by the Department of Public Works.
The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an
Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to
the subject property.
R:~S~TAFPRJr~IOPA93.PC 7114/93 kib {~
PRIOR
8.
e
11.
PRIOR
12.
All required fees shall be paid.
TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT:
A Transportation Demand Management Program will be required if there is a potential
for more than 1 O0 people to be employed at the .site.
The underlying Parcel Map 25059 shall be recorded.
The Developer shall notify the City's cable TV franchises of the intent to develop.
Conduit shall be installed to cable TV standards.
The Developer shall show proof of a recorded written offer to participate in, and waive
all rights to object to the formation of an Assessment District, a Community Facilities
District, or a Bridge and Major Thoroughfare Fee District for the construction of the
proposed "Western Bypass Corridor". The form shall be subject to the approval of the
City Engineer and City Attorney.
TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY
All existing improvements damaged or broken due to the construction of this project
shall be repaired or removed and replaced as directed by the Department of Public
Works per current City Standards.
~X,flSTAFPRFDIOPA93.PC 7114/93 Idb 7
J.H. HARET~
Coun=y Fir~ Chief
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
tqgE DEPARTMENT
210 WEST SAN JACINTO AVENUE · PERKIS, CALIFORNIA 92370
(714) 657-3183
February 8, 1993
TO:
ATTN:
RE:
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING DEPARTMENT.
CRAIG RUIZ
pA95-0c)09 PARCEL MAP N0.25059
1st. EXTENSION OF TIME
The Fire Department has a objections, comments or conditions
the granting of the extension of time.
All Ouestions regarding the meaning of conditions shall be
ferred to the Planning and Engineering Staff.
RAYMOND H. REGIS
Chief Fire Department Planner
Michael E. Gray, /
Fire Captain Specialist
for
[i~ R~VEREDE OFFIC:F-
]760 17.d~ ~,.,.w, R~r~. CA 92501
(7141 ZTS-~7T7 · FAX (7141 5.69-7451
pFa~v=u'~-~N DIVI3ION
SECTION
CI INto OFFIC:~
75.733 Ce,._.~.., CL~ O~ $":-- F, ~ CA 9ZZO!
(619) 863--1886 ;'AX (6191 863-;072
11:04
RECE!vkD
FEB
City of Temecula
Planning Department
pROIECT TRANSMITTAL
The attached project has beeaa sdxeduled for the Devdopment Review Committee Me~ting
of FebruarY 4, 1993.
Your written comments or att~ndaxtc~ is requested. Please tra~rrnit written comments prior
,to FebruarT 1, 199~.
The meaing will be held at: City of Teme~ula
planning Department
,~3174 Busin~sa Park Drive
Tem~culx, CA 92590
If you have any questions regaxding this project, please contact Craig Rttiz at (909) 694-6400.
Project 7-formation:
Case No.:
Applicant:
Proposal:
Location:
Intended
lEnvironmentzl Act}on:
A.P.N.:
Case Plaxu'mr:
Status:
Comments:
K~93-0010, 1st Extension of Tkne for I'lot :Plan No. 34
Prierred ~lui~ies
A proposexi 276,000 square fcxn off'tcedrestaurant development of
5.5 ac~s.
West side of :Ridge Park Drive, south of Rancho Ca.ljforn~a
Road
I~-e~rtify previously adopted Negative Declantion
940-310-033,034, 037
Craig Ruiz
New Project
R~subrni__"~l: previous DRC Dam:
is project was fixit approvext lanuary 15, 1991.
Ths Kiverside County fize Department recommends
approval-on the extension of ~ne on PP 34 PA
92-0010. Piesea refer to th~ original letter
of condition dated 10/09/90.
Ranch0
Water
February 3, 1993
RECEIVED
FEB 0 B 199,
Anfd ............
Board of Dir,ao~:
Doug Kulb~r~
Prtsmdent
Jeffrey L. Mirdder
St. Vk-~ President
Ralph H. Daily
Nsncy ~ Hughes
Csabs F. Ko
Lisa D. P,terson
Richard D. St,ffey
John F. Hereliar
C, ener~l Manlier
Phillip L Forbes
Director of Finance -
Kenneth C. L$~-mIF
& 3,1aintemma~
Perr~ tL Louck
Coneml|er
Linds ,~L Fregolo
Dts~nc~ ~ret~ry
,Jennings. ~n~s~rand
& Henrik~on
L~Is[ CourtseA
Mx. Craig Ruiz
City of Temecula
Planning Department
43180 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
Water Availability, Parcel Map 25059
PA93-0009, First Extension of Time
Dear Mr. Ruiz:
Please be advised that the above-referenced property is located within the
boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD). Water service,
therefore, would be available upon completion of financial arrangements
between RCWD and the property owner.
Water availability would be contingent upon the property owner signing an
Agency Agreement which assigns water management rights, ff any, to RCWD.
If you have any questions, please contact Ms. Senga Doherty.
Sincerely,
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT
Steve Brannon, P. E.
Manager of Development Engineering
Sa:SO:aj30/F186
cc: Senga Doherty, Engineering Technician
Ihtnch., CallbertHa Writer District
TO:
County of Riverside
HEALTH SERVICES AGENCY
CITY OF TEMEC~
ATTN: Craig Ruiz
DATE:
RECEIVED
FEB 13 8 1993
A~'d ........,,_,
02-01-93
~-GREG DELLENBACH, Environmental Health Specialist IV
FROM:
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 25059, 1ST EXTENSION OF TIME
RE: PA93-0009
The Department of Environmental Health has reviewed Case No.
PA93-0009, 1st Extension of Time for Tentative Parcel Map
NO. 25059.
This Department has approved this map on 08-20-91. The
sewer "will-serve" letter from Eastern Municipal Water
District dated 05-09-90 required "the developer to complete
all necessary financial and other arrangements...as
determined by the District by November 1991."
The Department of Environmental Health will, therefore,
require a current "will-serve" letter from Eastern Municipal
Water District at time of issuance of a Building Department
application.
Other than this requirement, we have no objections to the
Tentative Parcel Map from being extended.
GD:dr
ATTACHMENT NO. 4
PREVIOUSLY ADOPTED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
R:~S%STAFFRP~gPA93.CC 9120/93 vgw 15
A'I'I'ACHMENT I
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Parcel Map No. 25059
Minor Change No. 1
PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT.
A. Revise Condition No. 37 to read as follows:
37.
Prior to issuance of the first building permit, plans for traffic
signals, as warranted by an amended traffic study subject to the
final approval of the Department of Public Works, shall be
designed by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City
Engineer for the intersections of Rancho California Road at Ridge
Park Drive and Rancho California Road at Vincent Moraga.
B. Revise Condition No. 38 to read as follows:
38.
Prior to issuance of the first building permit, a signing and striping
plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and approved
by the City Engineer the intersection of Rancho California Road at
Ridge Park Drive to the intersection of Rancho California Road at
Vincent Moraga as directed by the Department of Public Works.
Based on the approved Traffic Study, these plans shall be
designed to provide for 300' of left turn storage capacity on
westbound Rancho California Road to southbound Ridge Park
Drive and southbound Vincent Moraga.
C. Delete Condition No. 39. in its entirety
D. Revise. Condition No. 40 to 'read as follows:
40.
Prior to issuance of the first building permit, the subdivider shall
submit an amended traffic study prepared by a registered Traffic
Engineer to determine the subdivider's percent of cost and the
warrants for both signals. The developer shall front the
construction costs of the signals as warranted for Rancho
California Road at Ridge Park Drive and Rancho California Road at
Vincent Moraga. The amended traffic study shall be subject to
the final approval of the Department of Public Works.
S%STAFFRPT%25059.PM 4
E. Revise Condition No. 41 to read as follows:
41.
Prior to issuance of the first building permit, the developer shall
enter into a reimbursement agreement with the City of Temecula
for the remaining percentage of the construction costs, above his
pro rata share, for construction of the signals, as warranted, for
Rancho California Road at Ridge Park Drive and Rancho California
Road at Vincent Moraga.
F. Revise Condition No. 42 to read as follows:
42.
Prior to issuance of the first building permit, plans for traffic signal
interconnect shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and
approved by the City Engineer along Rancho California Road from
Diaz Road to Ridge Park Drive.
G. Revise Condition No. 43 to read as follows:
43.
Prior to designing any of the above plans, contact the Department
of Public Works for the design requirements and the necessary
agreements.
Additionally, the following conditions should be changed to read "PRIOR TO THF~,
ISSUANCE OF OCCUPANCY PERMITS:
H. Revise Condition No. 44 to read as follows:
44.
Prior to occupancy of any portion of the site, all signing and
striping shall be installed and operational per the approved signing
and striping plan.
I. Revise Condition No. 45 to read as follows:
45.
Prior to occupancy of any portion of the site, the traffic signals for
the intersections of Rancho California Road at Ridge Park Drive
and Rancho California Road at Vincent Moraga shall be installed
and operational as warranted per the special provisions and the
approved traffic signal plan.
J. Revise Condition No. 46 to read as follows:
46.
Prior to occupancy of any portion of the site, all traffic signal
interconnects shall be installed per the approved plan and as
directed by the Department of Public Works.
$~STAFFRPT~25OSB.PM 5
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Plot Plan No: 34
Project Description: 276,312.5 Square Foot
Office/Restaurant Development
Assessor~s Parcel Nos.: 940-310-033, 034,
and 037
Plannincl Department
1. The use hereby permitted by this plot plan is for the development of a
276, 312.5 square foot officeJ restaurant development containing one ( 1 ) seven
(7) story office building (102,243.5 square feet and 91 feet high); one {1 )
7,872 square foot restaurant; one (1) four (4) story parking structure
{134,933 square feet}; and a future building pad only for a proposed 7,000
square foot restaurant on a 5.51 acre site.
2. The permittee shall defend, indemnify, and hoid harmless the City of
Temecula, its agents, officers, and employees from any claims, action, or
proceeding against the City of Temacula or its agents, officers, or employees
to'attack, set aside, void, or annul, an approval of the City of Temecula, its
advisory agencies, appeal boards, or legislative body concerning Plot Plan
No. 34. The City of Temecula will promptly notify the permittee of any such
claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula and wi)) cooperate
fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the permittee of any
such claim, action or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the
permittee shall not, thereafter, be responsibie to defend, indemnify, or hold .
harmless the City of Temecula.
3. This approval shall be used within two (2) years of approval date; otherwise,
it shall become null and void. By use is meant the baginning of substantial
construction contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period
which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the baginning of
substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. This approval shall
expire on January 15, 1993. ·
The development of the premises shall conform substantially with that as
shown on Plot Plan No. 34 marked Exhibit A, or as amended by these
conditions.
5. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly
upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way.
6. The applicant shall comply with the Engineering Department~s Conditions of
Approval which are included herein.
STA FFR PT\PP34 18
11o
10.
Prior to the issuance of grading or building permits, three (:3) copies of a
Parking, Landscaping, Irrigation, and Shading Plans shall be submitted to t~
Planning Department for approval. The location, number, genus, speci
and container size of the plants shall be shown. Plans shall meet ,,,
requirements of Ordinance No. :3z~8, Section 18.12. and shall be accompanied
by the appropriate filing fee.
All landscaped areas shall be planted in accordance with approved landscape,
irrigation, and shading plans prior to the issuance of occupancy permits. An
automatic sprinkler system shall be installed and all landscaped areas shall be
maintained in a viable growth condition. Planting within ten {10) feet of an
entry or exit driveway shall not be permitted to grow higher than thirty (30)
inches.
A minimum of 571 parking spaces shall be provided in accordance with Section
18.12, Riverside County Ordinance No. 348. 571 parking spaces shall be
provided as shown on the Approved Exhibit B. The parking area shall be
surfaced with asphaltic concrete paving to a minimum depth of 3 inches on ~
inches of Class II base.
A minimum of 8 handicapped parking spaces shall be provided as shown on
Exhibit B. Each parking space reserved for the handicapped shall be
identified by a permanently affixed reflectorized sign constructed of porcelain
on steel, beaded text or equal, displaying the International Symbol of
Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square inches in area and
shall be centered at the interior end of the parking space at a minimum height
if 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space finished grade,
or centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space finishe~-
grade, ground, or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuoL
piece, at each entrance to the off-street parking facility, not less than 17
inches i3y 22 inches, clearly and conspicuously stating the following:
"Unauthorized vehicles not displaying distinguishing
placards or license plates issued for physically
handicapped persons may be towed away at owner~s
expense. Towed vehicles may be reclaimed at
or by telephone ,,
In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall
have a surface identification sign duplicating the Symbol of Accessibility in
blue paint of at least 3 square feet in size.
Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall obtain clearance
and/or permits from the following agencies:
Planning Department School District
Engineering Department Riverside County Flood Control
Environmental Health Fire Department.
STAFFRPT\Pp3~ 19 "'
12.
13.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
A Plot Plan application for a Sign Program shall be submitted and approved by
the Planning Director prior to occupancy.
Building elevations shall be in substantial conformance with that shown on
Exhibit C.
Materials used in the construction of all buildings shall be in substantial
conformance with that shown on Exhibit C {Color Elevations) and Exhibit D
{Materials Board), with the exception of the green monolithic glazing (Item
"B") which shall be non-reflective.'
Roof-mounted equipment for the two {2) proposed restaurants shall be
shielded from ground view. Screening material shall be subject to Planning
Department approval. .
No roof-mounted equipment shall be permitted for the proposed seven story
office building and four story parking structure within the project site.
All trash enclosures shall be constructed prior to the issuance of occupancy
permits. Each enclosure shall be six feet in height and shall be made with
masonry block and a steel gate which screens the bins from external view.
Landscaping plans shall incorporate the use of specimen canopy trees along
streets and within the parking areas.
All street lights and other outdoor lightin9 shall be shown on electrical plans
submitted to the Department of Building and Safety for plan check approval
and shall comply with the requirements of Riverside County Ordinance No.
655.
This project is located within the vicinity of a subsidence zone. Prior to
issuance of any building permit by the Department of Building and Safety, a
letter of clearance from the Riverside County Geologist shall be submitted or
a California Licensed Soils Engin=cr or Geologist shall submit a report to the
Building and Safety Department identifying the potential for subsidence.
Where hazard of subsidence is determined to exist, appropriate mitigation
measures must be demonstrated.
If determined to be within the Habitat Conservation Plan Study Area, prior to
the issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall comply with Ordinance
No. 663 by paying the fee required by that ordinance which is based on the
gross acreage of the parcels proposed for development. Should Ordinance No.
663 be superseded by the provisions of a Habitat Conservation Plan prior to
the payment of the fees required by Ordinance No. 663, the applicant shall
pay the fee required under the Habitat Conservation Plan as implemented by
County ordinance or resolution.
23 Class I bicycle racks shall be provided in convenient locations as approved
by the Planning Director to facilitate bicycle access to the project area.
STAFFRPT\Pp3t4 20
Prior to the issuance of building permits, performance securities, in amounts
to be determined by the Director of Building and Safety to guarantee the
installation of plantings, walls, and fences in accordance with the approve ~
plan. and adequate maintenance of the Planting fqr one year, shall be file~
with the Department of Building and Safety.
Prior to the issuance of occupancy permits, all required landscape planting
and irrigation shall have been installed and be in a condition acceptable to the
Director of Building and Safety. The plants shall be healthy and free of
weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed
and in good working order.
25.
All utilities, except electrical lines rated 33kv or greater, shall be installed
underground.
26.
Prior to the sale of any structure as shown on Exhibit D, a land division shall
be recorded in accordance with Riverside County Ordinance No. L~60 and any
other pertinent ordinance.
27.
28.
Prior to the issuance of grading permits and Jot building permit, the developer
or his successor's interest shall submit a mitigation monitoring program which
shall describe how compliance with required mitigation measures will be met
and the appropriate monitoring timing of the mitigation. The applicant shall
reimburse the City for all monitoring activity cost.
All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to Occupancy or
any use allowed by this permit.
29.
30.
The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site
property interests, and if he or she should fail to do so, the developer shall
at least 120 days prior to submittal for building permit, enter into an
agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Government Code Section
66L~62 at such time as the City acquires the property interests required for the
improvements. Such agreement shall provide for payment by the developer
of all costs incurred by the City to acquire the off-site property interests
required in connection with the project. Security for a portion of these costs
shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal
report Obtained by the developer, at the developer's cost. The appraiser
shall have been approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal.
Prior to the issuance of buildin9 permits, a certificale of Parcel Merger or Lot
Line Adjustment shall be approved by.the Engineering Department.
Riversid~ County Fire Del~artment
The Fire Department is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or
construction of all commercial buildings using the procedure established in
Ordinance 5~6.
STAFFRPT\PP34 21 ~
32.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
z~O.
42.
43.
Provide or show there exists a water system capable of delivering 2000 CPM
for a 2 hour duration at 20 PSI residual operating pressure, which must be
available before any combustible material is placed on the job site.
A combination of on-site and off-site super fire hydrants 16"x4"x2 1/2x2 1/2 ),
will be located not less than 25 feet or more than 165 feet from any portion of
the building as measured along approved vehicular travelways. The required
fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant{ s) in the system.
The required fire flow may be adjusted at a later point in the permit process
to reflect changes in design, construction type, area separation or built-in
fire protection measures.
Install a complete fire sprinkler system in all buildings requiring a fire flow
of 1500 GPM or greater. The post indicator valve and fire department
connection shall be located to the front, within 50 feet of a hydrant, and a
minimum of 25 feet from the building{ s) . A statement that the buiidingl s) will
be automatically fire sprinklered must be included on the title page of the
building plans.
Install a supervised waterflow monitoring fire alarm system. Plans must be
submitted to the Fire Department for approval prior to installation, .as
required by the Uniform Building Code.
A statement that the building will be automatically fire sprinklered must
appear on the title page of the building plans.
Install panic hardware and exit signs as per Chapter 33 of the Uniform
Building Code. Low-level exit signs, where exit signs are required by
Section 33141 a) .
Certain designated areas will be required to be maintained as fire lanes.
install portable fire extinguishers with a minimum rating of 2A-10BC. Contact
a .certified extinguisher company for proper placement of equipment.
Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant/developer shall' be
responsible to submit a check or money order in the amount of $558.00 to the
Riverside County Fire Department for plan check fees.
Prior to the issuance of building permits, the developer shall deposit with the
Riverside County Fire Department, a check or money order equaling the sum
of 25 cents per square foot as mitigation for fire protection impacts. This
amount must be submitted seDarately from the plan check review fee.
Building "C" must meet highrise life safety requirements per Riverside County
Ordinance 546, Section 801, parking garage install Class I II standpipe system.
Final conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed in the
Building and Safety Office.
~-- STAFFRPT\pp34 22
Enqineerinq Department
The following are the Engineering Department Conditions of Approval for tl-"~
project. and shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All questioL_
regarding the tru~ meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the Engineering
Department.
It is understood that the Developer correctly shows all existing easements, traveled
ways, and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be
resubmitted for further consideration.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS:
The developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies:
Rancho California Water District;
Eastern Municipal Water District;
Riverside County Flood Control district;
City of Temecula Fire Bureau;
Planning Department;
Engineering Department;
Riverside County Health Department; and
CATV Franchise.
The developer shall submit four {L~) copies of a soils report to the Engineering
Department. The report shall address the soils stability and geological
conditions of the site.
A 9radin9 permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Department prior t
commencement of any grading outside of the City-maintained road right-d-
way.
50.
51.
52.
If grading is to take place between the .months of October and April, erosion
control plans will be required. Erosion control plans and notes shall be
submitted and approved by the Engineering Department.
Prior to any work being performed in public right'of-way, fees shall be paid
and an encroachment permit shall be obtained from the City Engineerms Office.
The developer shall provide clearance from all applicable agencies and pay all
fees prior to the approval of plans.
All work done within the City right-of-way shall have an encroachment permit.
A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the prevailing
Area Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new development. The
charge is payable to the Flood Control District prior to issuance of permits.
If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already credited to
this property, no new charge needs to be paid.
STAFFRPT\PP3q 23
53.
A drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer.
All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City' Engineer.
All concentrated drainage directed toward the public street shall be diverted
through the undersidewalk drains.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT:
55. A precise grading plan shall be submitted to the Engineering Department for
review and approval. The building pad shall be certified by a registered Civil
Engineer for location and elevation, and the Soil Engineer shall issue a Final
Soils Report addressing compaction and site conditions.
Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall deposit with the
Engineering Department a cash sum as established per acre as mitigation for
traffic signal impact.
56.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATION OF OCCUPANCy:
57. Street lights shall be provided along streets adjoining the subject site in
accordance with the standards of Ordinance No. ~61 and as approved by the
City Engineer.
58.
Developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities
imposed upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public
facility mitigation as required under the EIR/Negative Declaration for the
project, in the amount in effect at the time of payment of the fee. If an interim
or final public facility mitigation fee or district has not been finally
established by the date on which Developer requests its building permits for
the project or any phase thereof, the Developer shall execute the Agreement
for Payment of'Public Facility Fee, a copy of which has been provided to
Developer. Developer understands that said agreement may require the
payment of fees in excess of those now estimated (assuming benefit to the
project in the amount of such fees) and specifically waives its right to protest
such increase.
Transportation Enqineerinq
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDINC PERMITS:
59.
Plans for a traffic signal shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and
approved by the City Engineer for the intersection of Rancho California Road
and Ridge Park Drive.
60.
A signin9 and striping plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer
and approved by the City Engineer for the intersection of Rancho California
Road and Ridge Park Drive. Based on the Traffic Study, these plans shall be
designed to provide for 300~ of left turn storage capacity on westbound
Rancho California Road to southbound Ridge Park Drive.
.~_ STA FFR PT\ PP34 2z&
61.
62.
The developer shall contribute L~6 percentage for the construction costs of the
signal at Rancho California Road and Ridge Park Drive.
The developer may enter into a reimbursement agreement with the City for
remaining percentage of the construction costs, above his pro rate share, for
the signal at Rancho California Road and Ridge'Park Drive,
63.
Credit shall be given toward the developeris signal mitigation fees for the
design and construction of the signal at Ridge Park Drive and Rancho
California Road.
Plans for traffic signal interconnect shall be designed by a registered Civil
Engineer and approved by the City Engineer along Rancho California Road
from Diaz Road to Ridge Park Drive.
65.
Prior to designing any of the above plans, contact Transportation Engineeri.ng
for the design requirements.
PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF OCCUPANCY PERMITS:
66.
All signing and striping shall be installed per the approved signing and
striping plan.
67.
The traffic signal at Rancho California Road and Ridge Park Drive shall be
installed and operational per the special provisions, and the approved traffic
signal plan.
68.
All traffic signal interconnects shall be installed per the approved plan.
STAFFRPT\PP3q 25 -----,,
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Tentative Parcel Map No: 25059
Project Description: Four (~4) Lot Industrial
Subdivision
Assessor's Parcel No.: 9~0-310-033, 03u,
and 037
Planninq DeiDartment
The tentative subdivision shall comply with the State of California Subdivision
Map Act and to all the requirements of Ordinance ~60, Schedule E, unless
modified by the conditions listed below. A time extension may be approved in
accordance with the State Map Act and City Ordinance, upon written request,
if made 30 days prior to the expiration date.
This conditionally approved tentative map will expire two years after the
approval date, unless extended as provided by Ordinance ~60. The expiration
date is January 15, 1993.
The final map shall be prepared by a licensed land surveyor subject to all the
requirements of the State of California Subdivision Map Act and Ordinance
zl.60.
Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid prior to recordation. of the final
map.
Legal access as required by Ordinance ~60 shall be provided from the tract
map boundary to a City maintained road.
All road easements shall be offered for dedication to the public and shall
continue in force until the governing body accepts or abandons such offers.
All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the City
Engineer. Street names shall be subject to approval of the City Engineer.
Easements, when required for roadway slopes, drainage facilities, utilities,
etc., shall be shown on the final map if they are located within the land
division boundary. All offers of dedication and conveyances shall be
submitted and recorded as directed by the City Engineer.
Subdivision phasing, including any proposed common open space area
improvement phasing, if applicable, shal. I be subject to Planning Department
approval. Any proposed phasing shall provide for adequate vehicular access
to all lots in each phase, and shall substantially conform to the intent and
purpose of the subdivision approval.
STAFFRPT\PP31~ 32
10.
11.
12·
15.
An Association shall be established for maintenance of Lot 4. Open
Space/Common Area and the developer/applicant shall pay for all costs
relating to establishment of the Property Owners Association.
A copy of the finai grading plan shall be submitted to the Planning Department
for review and approval. All on-site cut and fill slopes shall:
a. Be limited to a maximum slope ratio of 2 to 1 and a maximum vertical
height of thirty (:30) feet. Setbacks from top and bottom of slopes shall
be a minimum of one-half the slope height.
b. Be contour-graded to blend with existing natural contours.
c. Be a part of the downhill lot when within or between individual lots.
All slopes over three (3) feet in height shall be landscaped and irrigated
according to the City Development Code. A detailed landscaping and
irrigation plan, prepared by a qualified professional, shall be submitted to the
City Planning Department for review and approval prior to issuance of grading
permits.
All proposed construction shall comply with the California Institute of
Technology, Palomar Observatory Outdoor Lighting Policy, as outlined in the
Southwest Area Plan.
Lots created by this subdivision shall comply with the following:
Lots created by this subdivision shall be in confo,~,i~ance with the ~
development standards of the I-P {Industrial Park) zone.
Graded but undeveloped land shall be maintained in a weed-free
condition and shall be either planted with interim landscaping or
provided with other erosion control measures as approved by the
Director of Building and Safety.
The developer shall be responsible for maintenance and upkeep of all slopes,
landscaped areas and irrigation systems until such time as those operations
are the responsibilities of other parties as approved by the Planning Director.
Prior to recordat/on of the final map, an Environmental Constraints 5heel
{ECS) shall be prepared in conjunction with the final map to delineate
identified environmental concerns and shall be permanently filed with the
office of the City Engineer. A copy of the EC5 shall be transmitted to the
Planning Department for review and approval. The approved ECS shall be
forwarded with copies of the recorded final map to the Planning Department
and the Department of Building and .Safety.
STAFFRPT\PP3~ 33
16.
Prior to the issuance of GRADINC PERMITS the following conditions shall be
satisfied:
Prior to the issuance of grading permits detailed common. open space
area landscaping and irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning
Department approval for the phase of development in process. The
plans shall be certified by a landscape architect,-and shall provide for
the following:
Permanent automatic irrigation systems shall be installed on all
landscaped areas requiring irrigation.
Landscape screening where required shall be designed to be
opaque up to a minimum height of six (6) feet at maturity·
All utility service areas and enclosures shall be screened from
view with landscaping and decorative barriers or baffle
treatments, as approved by the Planning Director. Utilities shall
be placed underground·
ee
Parkways shall be landscaped to provide visual screening or a
transition into the primary use area of the site. Landscape
elements shall include earth betruing, ground cover, shrubs and
specimen tr===. Front yards shall be landscaped and street trees
planted.
Landscaping plans shall incorporate the use of specimen accent
trees at key visual focal points within the project.
Where street trees cannot be planted within right-of-way of
interior streets and project parkways due to insufficient road
right-of-way, they shall be planted outside of the road right-of-
way.
Landscaping plans shall incorporate native and drought tolerant
plants where appropriate.
All existing specimen trees and significant rock outcroppings on
the subject property shall be shown on the projectts grading
plans and shall note those to be removed, relocated and/or
retained.
All trees shall be minimum double staked. Weaker and/or slow
growing trees shall be steel staked.
STA FFR PT\PP34 34
17.
If the project is to be phased. prior to the approval of grading
permits, an overall conceptual grading plan shall be submitted
the Planning Director for approval. The plan shall be used as
guideline for subsequent detailed grading plans for individu~.
phases of development and shall include the following:
Techniques which will be utilized to prevent erosion and
sedimentation during and after the grading process.
Approximate time frames for grading and identification of
areas which may be graded during the higher probability
rain months of January through March.
Preliminary pad and r~adway elevations.
Areas of temporary grading outside of a particular phase·
All cut slopes located adjacent to ungraded natural terrain and
exceeding ten (10) feet in vertical height shall be contour-
graded incorporating the following grading techniques:
The angle of the graded slope shall be gradually adjusted
to the angle of the natural terrain·
Angular forms shall be discouraged. The graded form
shall reflect the natural rounded terrain.
:3. The toes and tops of slopes shall be rounded with curves
with radii designed in proportion to the total height of the
slopes where drainage and stability permit such rounding.
Where cut or fill slopes exceed 300 feet in horizontal
length.' the horizontal contour~s of the slope shall be
curved in a continuous. undulating fashion.
Prior to the issuance .of grading permits. the developer shall
provide evidence to the Director of Building and Safety that all
adjacent off-site manufactured slopes have recorded stope
easements and that slope maintenance responsibilities have been
assigned as alPproved by the Director of Buildin9 and Safety.
Prior to the issuance of grading permits. a qualified paleontologist shall be
retained by the developer for consultation and co,,,,ent on the proposed
grading with respect to potential paleontological impacts. Should the
paleontologist find the potential is high for impact to significant resources, a
pre-grade meeting between the paleontologist and the excavation and grading
contractor shall be arranged. When necessary, the paleontologist or
representative shall have the authority to temporarily divert, redirect or halt
9radin9 activity to allow recovery of fossils.
STAFFRPT\PP3~ 35 ~'
18.
19.
20.
21.
Prior to the issuance of BUILDING PERMITS the following conditions shall be
satisfied:
Prior to the submittal of building plans to the Department of Building
and Safety an acoustical 'study shall be performed by an acoustical
engineer to establish appropriate mitigation measures that shall be
applied to-individual dwelling units within the subdivision to reduce
ambient interior noise levels to z&5 Ldn.
All building plans for all new structures shall incorporate, all required
elements from the subdivision~s approved fire protection plan as
approved by'the County Fire Marshal.
Prior to the issuance of building permits, composite landscaping and
irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning Department approval.
The plans shall address all areas and aspects the tract requiring
landscaping and irrigation to be installed including, but not limited to,
parkway planting, street trees, slope planting, and individual front
yard landscaping.
Prior to the issuance of OCCUPANCY PERMITS the following conditions shed}
be satisfied:
All landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in accordance with
approved plans prior to the issuance of occupancy permits. If seasonal
conditions do not permit planting, interim landscaping and erosion
control measures shall be utilized as approved by the Planning Director
and the Director of Building and Safety.
All landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in accordance with
approved plans and shall be verified by City field inspection.
Not withstanding the preceding conditions, wherever an acoustical
study is required for noise attenuation purposes, the heights of all
required walls shall be determined by the acoustical study where
applicable.
Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall comply with the
provisions of Ordinance No. 663 by paying the appropriate fee set forth in
that ordinance. Should Ordinance No. 663 be superseded by the provisions
of a Habitat Conservation Plan prior to the payment of the fee required by
Ordinance No. 663, the applicant shall pay the fee required by the Habitat
Conservation Plan as implemented by County ordinance or resolution.
The subdivider shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of
Temecuta, its agents, officer, and employees from any claim, action, or
proceeding againat the City of Temecula or its agents, officer, or employees
to attach, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the City of Temecula, its
advisory agencies, appeal boards or legislative body concerning Tentative
Parcel Map No. 25059, which action is brought within the time period provided
""" STAFFRPT\PP3q 36
23.
for in California Government Code Section 66499.37. The City of Temecula will
promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceedir~
against the City of Temecula and will cooperate fully in the defense. If 1
City fails to promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, o,-
proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the subdivider shall dot,
thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City of
Temecula.
22.
The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site
property interests, and if he or she should fail to do so, the developer shall
at least 120 days prior to submittal of the final map for approval, enter into
an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Government Code
Section 66462 at such time as the City acquires the property interests
required for the improvements. Such agreement shall provide for payment by
the developer of all costs incurred by the City to acquire the off-site property
interests required in connection with the subdivision. Security of a portion
of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an
appraisal report obtained by the developer, at the developer~s cost. The
appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to commencement of the
appraisal.
All utility systems including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer, and cable
TV shall be provided for underground, with easements provided as required,
and designed and constructed in accordance with City Codes and the utility
provided. Telephone, cable TV, and/or security systems shall be pre-wired
in the residence.
All utilities, except electrical lines rated 33kv or greater, shall be installed-~
underground.
Covenants. Conditions and Restrictions/Reciprocal Access Easements:
25.
26.
The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions {CC~;R's) shall be reviewed and
approved by the Planning Department prior to final approval of the tract
maps. The CCF, RIs shall include liability insurance and methods of maintaining
the open space. recreation areas, parking areas, private roads, and exterior
of all buildings.
No lot or dwelling unit in the development shall be sold unless a corporation,
association, property owner~s group, or similar entity has b::n formed with
the right to assess all properties individually owned or jointly owned which
have any rights or interest in the use of the common areas and common
facilities in the development, such assessment power to be sufficient to meet
the expenses of such entity, and with authority to control, and the duty to
maintain, all of said mutually available features of the development. Such
entity shall operate under recorded CCF, R~s which shall include compulsory
membership of all owners of lots and/or dwelling units and flexibility of
assessments to meet changing costs of maintenance, 'repairs, and services.
Recorded CCF, R's shall permit enforcement by the City of Provisions required
by the City as Conditions of Approval. The developer shall submit evidence
STAFFRPT\Pp3~ 37
of compliance with this requirement to, and receive approval of, the City prior
to making any such sale. This condition shall not apply to land dedicated to
the City for public purposes.
27.
~Every owner of a dwelling unit or lot shall own as an appurtenance to such
dwelling unit or lot, either ( 1 ) an undivided interest in the common areas and
facilities, or (2) as share in the corporation, or voting membership in an
association, owning the common areas and facilities.
28.
Maintenance for all landscaped and open areas, including parkways, shall be
provided for in the CC8;R~s.
Enqineerinq Department
The following are the Engineering Department Conditions of Approval for this
project, and shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All questions
regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the Engineering
Department.
It is understood that the Developer correctly shows all existing easements, traveled
ways. and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be
resubmitted for further consideration.
29.
The Developer shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act,
and all applicable City Ordinances and Resolutions.'
The final map shall be prepared by a licensed land surveyor or registered
Civil Engineer, subject to all the requirements of the State of California
Subdivision Map Act and Ordinance No. L~60.
PRIOR TO RECORDATION OF THE FINAL MAP:
31..
The developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies:
- Rancho California Water District;
- Eastern Municipal Water District;
- Riverside County Flood Control district;
- City of Temecula Fire Bureau;
- Planning Department;
- Engineering Department; ·
- Riverside County Health Department; and
- CATV Franchise.
- CalTrans
STA FFR PT\ PP34 38
32.
33.
A declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions {CCSR's) shall be
prepared by the developer and submitted to the Director of Planning. Citv-~
Engineer and City Attorney. The CCSR's shall be signed and acknowledge
by all parties having any record title interest in the property to be developed,
shall make the City a party thereto, and shall be enforceable by the City.
The CCF, R~s shall be reviewed and approved by the City and recorded. The
CC~;R's shall be subject to the following conditions:
a. The CCF, R's shall be prepared at the deveioper's sole cost and expense.
b. The CCSR's shall be in the form and content approved by the Director
of Planning, City Engineer and the City Attorney, and shall include
such provisions as are required by this approval and as said officials
deem necessary to protect the interest of the City and its residents.
c. The CCF, R's and Articles of Incorporation of the Property Owner's
Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering
Divisions and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrent
with the final map. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City.
d. The CCSR~s shall provide for the effective establishment, opef-ation,
management, use, repair and maintenance of all common areas and
facilities.
The CCF, R's shall provide that the property shall be developed,
operated and maintained so as not to create a public nuisance.
The CCSR's shall provide that if the property is not maintained in the
condition required by the CCF, R's, then the City, after making due
demand and giving reasonable notice, may enter the property and
perform,' at the owner~s sole expense, any maintenance required
thereon by the CCSR's or the City ordinances. The property shall be
subject to a lien in favor of the City to secure any such expense not
promptly reimbursed.
Street lights shall be provided along street_~ EKjjoining the subject site in
accordance with the standards of Ordinance No. q61 and as alpproved by the
City Engineer.
Prior to recordation of the fin~.} map, the developer shall deposit with the
Engineering Department a cash sum as established, per lot, as mitigation
towards traffic signal irnDa,.~s. Should the developer choose to defer the time
of payment of traffic signal mitigation fee, he may enter into a written
agreement with the City deferring said payment to the time of issuance of a
building permit.
c. FAFFRPT\PP34 39
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY:
35.
Developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities
imposed upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public
facility mitigation as required under the EIR/Negative Declaration for the
project, in the amount in effect at the time of payment of the.fee, If an interim
or final public facility mitigation fee or district has not been finally
established by. the date on which Developer requests its building permits for
the project or any phase thereof, the Developer shall execute the Agreement
for Payment of Public Facility Fee, a copy of which has been provided to
Developer. Developer understands that said Agreement may require the
payment of fees in excess of those now estimated {assuming benefit to the
project in the amount of such fees) and .specifically waives its right to protest
such increase,
Transportation Enqineerinq
PRIOR TO RECORDATION:
36.
37.
Plans for a traffic signal shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and
approved by the City Engineer for the intersection of Rancho California Road
and Ridge Park Drive.
A signing and striping plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer
and approved by the City Engineer for the intersection of Rancho California
Road and Ridge Park Drive. Based on the Traffic Study, these plans shall be
designed to provide for 300' of left turn storage capacity on westbound
Rancho California Road to southbound Ridge Park Drive.
38.
Credit shall be given toward the developers signal mitigation fees for the
design and construction of the signal at Ridge Park Drive and Rancho
California Road.
39.
41.
42.
The developer shall contribute 46 percentage for the construction costs of the
signal at Rancho California Road and Ridge Park Drive.
The developer may enter into a reimbursement agreement with the City for the
remaining percentage of the construction costs, above his pro rata share, for
the signal at F~ancho California Road and Ridge Park Drive.
Plans for traffic signal interconnect shall be designed by a registered Civil
Engineer and approved by the City Engineer along Rancho California Road
from Diaz Road to Ridge Park Drive.
Prior to designing any of the above plans, contact Transportation Engineering
for the design requirements.
STAFFRPT\PP34 ~0
PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF OCCUPANCY PERMITS:
All signin9 and striping shall be installed per the approved signing and
striping plan.
The traffic signal at Rancho California Road and Ridge Park Drive shall be
installed and operational per the special provisions and the approved trdF~ic
signal plan.
~5. All traffic signal interconnects shall be installed per the approved plan.
STAFFRPT\PP3~
ATTACHMENT NO. 5
JULY 19, 1993 AND AUGUST 2, 1993
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORTS
R:%S%STAFFRPT%gPA93.CC 9120/93 vgw 16
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
· PLANNING COMMISSION
July 19, 1993
PA93-0009, Tentative Parcel Map 25059, First Extension of Time
Prepared By: Craig D. Ruiz, Assistant Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Department Staff recommends that the Planning
Commission:
APPROVE PA93-0009, Tentative Parcel Map 25059, First
Extension of Time Subject to the Attached Conditions of
Approval.
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT:
Preferred Equities
REPRESENTATIVE:
Anthony Polo
PROPOSAL:
A request for a one year time extension for Tentative Parcel Map
25059, a four lot subdivision of 5.51 acres.
LOCATION:
Westerly side of Ridge Park Drive, approximately 70 feet south
of Rencho California Road.
EXISTING ZONING:
I-P (Industrial Professional)
SURROUNDING ZONING:
North:
South:
East:
West:
I-P (Industrial Professional)
I-P (Industrial Professional)
I-P (Industrial Professional)
I-P (Industrial Professional)
PROPOSED LAND USE
DESIGNATION:
Business Perk
EXISTING LAND USE:
VBcBnt
SURROUNDING
LAND USES:
North:
South:
East:
West:
Vacant
Vacant
Vacant
Vacant
It~l'AR:IlaT~PA93.1eC 7114193 i 1
BACKGROUND
The proposed project was previously approved by the Temecula City Council on January 15,
1991. The project was processed and approved concurrently with Plot Plan No. 34.
Pursuant to the recently modified Approval Authority Ordinance, all extensions of time are
now heard by the Planning Commission as Consent Calendar Items.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The project is for the subdivision of 5.51 acres into four parcels. The proposed parcels will
accommodate one office building, two restaurants and a four level parking structure. The
building pads have previously been mass graded as part of the underlying map.
ANALYSIS
The primary issue for this project has been the adding off a new condition of approval relevant
to the Western Bypass Corridor. Condition No. 18 states "The Developer shall record a
written offer to participate in, and waive all rights to object to the formation of an Assessment
District, a Community Facilities District, or a Bridge and Major Thoroughfare Fee District for
the construction of the proposed "Western Bypass Corridor." The form of the offer shall be
subject to the approval of the City Engineer and City Attorney." All new and previously
approved projects subject to City approval that may impact the Western Bypass Corridor have
been required to meet this condition.
ZONING, FUTURE GENERAL PLAN AND SWAP CONSISTENCY
The project site is zoned Industrial Professional (I-P) and adjacent parcels are also zoned I-P.
The proposed Draft General Plan Land Use Designation is Business Park. The SWAP
designation is Restricted Light Industrial. The proposed project is consistent with the
requirements of the I-P Zone and Ordinance No. 348.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
For the original approval of this project a Negative Declaration was issued under the CEQA
guidelines. The project is unchanged from that which was originally approved. Therefore, no
further environmental assessment on PA93-0009, Tentative Parcel Map No. 25059, First
Extension of Time is required. Mitigation measures contained in the conditions of approval
will mitigate potential impacts which will be created by the project.
SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS
The proposed project was previously approved by the City of Temecula. The project before
the Commission is unchanged from that which was previously approved. Minor changes to
the Conditions of Approval have been made to comply with new laws and City ordinances and
to protect the general health and safety of the citizens of Temecula.
The proposed project is consistent with the presen~ and future zoning and General Plan Land
Use Designations. All potential environmental impacts were addressed during the previous
approval and mitigations were incorporated into the conditions of approval.
It%S%STAFRiel~aAI3.1eC 7114/93 klb 2
FINDINGS
The findings for the original approval for Tentative Parcel Map No. 25059 are found
to remain valid except as amended her. in.
No subsequent changes are proposed in the project which would require revisions to
the previously certified Negative Declaration due to the involvement of new significant
environmental impacts not considered in the previously approval of this project.
3. No new information of substantial importance to the project has become available.
There is a reasonable probability that Tentative Parcel Map No. 25059, First Extension
of Time will be consistent with the City's Draft General Plan, which will be completed
in a reasonable time and in accordance with State law. The Draft General Plan Land
use designation for the site is Business Park. The proposed development is consistent
with the Business Park zone.
e
The proposed use or action complies with State planning and zoning laws. The
proposed use complies with City of Temecula Ordinance No. 348 and Ordinance 460·
The site is suitable to accommodate the proposed land use in terms of the size and
shape of the lot configuration, circulation patterns, access, and intensity of use, due
to the fact that the Proposed subdivision complies with the standards of Ordinance No.
348 and Ordinance 460·
The project as designed and conditioned will not adversely affect the public health or
welfare, due to the fact that the Conditions of Approval include mitigation measures.
The project is compatible with surrounding proposed land uses. The harmony in scale,
bulk, height, intensity, and coverage creates a compatible physical relationship with
adjoining properties, due to the fact that similar uses are proposed for properties in the
vicinity of this project.
The proposal will not have an adverse effect on surrounding property, because it does
not represent a significant change to the planned land use of the area, due to the fact
that the proposed use is compatible proposed land use designation of Business Park.
10.
11.
All lots have acceptable access to existing and proposed dedicated right-of-ways which
are open to, and are us.able by, vehicular traffic as evidenced on the Tentative Parcel
Map showing access to Ridge Park Drive.
Said findings are supported by maps, exhibits and environmental documents associated
with these applications and her.in incorporated by reference.
Attachments:
Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 4
Previously Adopted Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 8
Exhibits - Blue Page 9.
A. Vicinity Map
B. SWAP Map
C. Zoning Map
R:%S~STAFFFIsT%OPAO3.PC 7114/93 Idle
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
July 19, 1993
PA93-0010, Plot Plan No. :34, First Extension of Time
Prepared By: Craig D. Ruiz, Assistant Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Department Staff recommends that the Planning
Commission:
APPROVE PA93-0010, Plot Plan No. 34, First Extension
of Time Subject to the Attached Conditions of Approval.
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT:
Preferred Equities
REPRESENTATIVE:
Anthony Polo
PROPOSAL:
A request for a one year time extension for Plot Plan No. 34, a
seven (7) story office building totaling 102,243 square feet, a
7,872 square foot restaurant, a four (4) level parking structure
containing 134,933 square feet, and a building pad for a
proposed 7,000 square foot restaurant on 5.51 acres.
LOCATION:
Westerly side of Ridge Park Drive, approximately 70 feet south
of Rancho California Road.
'EXISTING ZONING:
I-P (Industrial Professional)
SURROUNDING
ZONING:
North:
South:
East:
West:
I-P (Industrial Professional)
I-P (Industrial Professional)
I-P (Industrial Professional)
I-P (Industrial Professional)
PROPOSED LAND USE
DESIGNATION:
Business Park
EXISTING LAND USE:
Vacant
SURROUNDING LAND USES:
North: Vacant
South: Vacant
East: Vacant
West: Vacant
BACKGROUND
The proposed project was previously approved by the Temecula City Council on January 15,
1991. The project was processed and approved concurrently with Tentative Parcel Map No.
25059.
Pursuant to the recently modified Approval Authority Ordinance, all extensions of time are
now heard by the Planning Commission as Consent Calendar items.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The project is a request for a one year time extension for Plot Plan No. 34 which includes a
seven (7) story office building totaling 102,243 square feet, a 7,872 square foot restaurant,
a four (4) level parking structure containing 134,933 square feet, and a building pad for a
proposed 7,000 square foot restaurant on 5.51 acres.
ANALYSIS
The primary issue for this project has been adding a new condition relevant to the Western
Bypass Corridor. Condition No. 18 states "The Developer shall record a written offer to
participate in, end waive all rights to object to the formation of an Assessment District, a
Community Facilities District, or a Bridge end Major Thoroughfare Fee District for the
construction of the proposed "Western Bypass Corridor." The form of the offer shall be
subject to the approval of the City Engineer and City Attorney. All new. and previously
approved projects subject to City approval that may impact the Western Bypass Corridor have
been required to meet this condition.
ZONING, FUTURE GENERAL PLAN AND SWAP CONSISTENCY
The project site is zoned Industrial Professional (I-P) and adjacent parcels are also zoned I-P.
The proposed Draft General Plan Land Use Designation is Business Park. The SWAP
designation is Restricted Light Industrial. The proposed project is consistent with the
requirements of the I-P Zone and Ordinance No. 348.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
For the original approval of this project a Negative Declaration was issued under the CEQA
guidelines. The project is unchanged from that which was originally approved. Therefore, no
further environmental assessment on PA93-0010, Plot Ran No. 34, First Extension of Time
is required. Mitigation measures contained in the conditions of approval will mitigate potential
impacts which will be created by the project.
SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS
The proposed project was previously approved by the City of Temecula. The project before
the Commission is unchanged fro~ that which was previously approved. Minor changes to
the Conditions of Approval have been made to comply with new laws and City ordinances and
to protect the general health and safety of the citizens of Temecula.
FINDINGS
The findings for the original approval for Plot Plan No. 34 are found to remain valid
except as amended her·in.
No subsequent changes are proposed in the project which would require revisions to
the previously certified Negative Declaration due to the involvement of new significant
environmental impacts not considered in the previous approval of this project.
3. No new information of substantial importance to the project has become available.
e
There is a reasonable probability that PA93-0010, Plot Plan No. 34, First Extension of
Time, will be consistent with the City's Draft General Plan, which will be completed
in a reasonable time and in accordance with State law. The Draft General Plan Land
use designation for the site is Business Park. The proposed development is consistent
with the Business Park zone.
The proposed use or action complies with State planning and zoning laws. The
proposed use complies with City of Temecula Ordinance No. 348 and Ordinance 460.
e
The site is suitable to accommodate the proposed land use in terms of the size and
shape of the lot configuration, circulation patterns, access, and intensity of use, due
to the fact that the proposed subdivision complies with the standards of Ordinance No.
348 and Ordinance 460.
The project as designed and conditioned will not adversely affect the public health or
welfare, due to the fact that the Conditions of Approval include mitigation measures.
The project is compatible with surrounding proposed land uses. The harmony in scale,
bulk, height, intensity, and coverage creates a compatible physical relationship with
adjoining properties, due to the fact that similar uses are proposed for properties in the
vicinity of this project.
The proposal will not have an adverse effect on surrounding property, because it does
not represent a significant change to the planned land use of the area, due to the fact
that the proposed use is compatible with the proposed land use designation of
Business Professional.
10.
All lots have acceptable access to existing and proposed dedicated right-of-ways which
are open to, and are us·able by, vehicular traffic as evidenced on the Tentative Parcel
Map showing access to Ridge Park Drive.
11.
Said findings are supported by maps, exhibits and environmental documents associated
with these applications and herein incorporated by reference.
Attachments:
Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 5
Previously Adopted Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 9
Exhibits - Blue Page 10
A. Vicinity Map
B. SWAP Map
C. Zoning Map
R:%S%STAFFIFI~I0i~Af3.1~C 7114/t3 ki 4
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Planning Commission
FROM:
Gary Thornhill, Planning Director
DATE:
August 2, 1993
SUBJECT:
PA93-0009, Tentative Parcel Map No. 25059, First Extension of Time and
PA93-0010, Plot Plan No. 34, First Extension of Time
Prepared by:
Craig D. Ruiz, Assistant Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Department Staff recommends that the Planning
Commission:
RE-AFFIRM The previously adopted Negative Declaration
for Tentative Parcel Map 25059; and
APPROVE PA93-0009, Tentative Parcel Map 25059, First
Extension of Time Subject to the Attached Conditions of
Approval; and
RE-AFFIRM The previously adopted Negative Declaration
for Plot Plan No. 34; and
APPROVE PA93-0010, Plot Plan No. 34, First Extension
of Time Subject to the Attached Conditions of Approval.
BACKGROUND
On January 15, 1991, the City of Temecula City Council approved the above referenced
projects. On October 7, 1991, the City of Temecula Planning Commission approved a Minor
Change application for Tentative Parcel Map 25059·
These two items were previously heard at the July 19, 1993 Planning Commission meeting.
The Commission continued the item to the August 2, 1993 Commission meeting and directed
staff to clarify the status of the minor change as it relates to this proposal ant to traffic signal
mitigation.
R:\S~STAFFRPT%gPA93.PC2 7/27/93 tie 1
DISCUSSION
Previous Conditions of Approval
The October 7, 1991 approval of the Minor Change for Tentative Parcel Map 25059 modified
nine Public Works conditions of approval relative to traffic signals and traffic striping. The
amended conditions provide for an additional traffic signal and the associated striping at the
intersection of Rancho California Road and Vincent Moraga Drive while deferring the traffic
conditions to the building permit stage.
The Planning Commission expressed concern that the amended conditions, due to the minor
change, were not included in their July 19, 1993 staff report. Subsequently, the previously
amended conditions of approval have been included in the August 2, 1993 staff report and
remain valid except where superseded by the current conditions of approval.
Length of Extension of Time
At the July 19, 1993 meeting, the applicant's representative stated that because the project
is conditioned to provide for offsite improvements in an amount in excess of 9100,000, an
automatic three year extension should be granted.
However, Section 66452.6 of the Subdivision Map Act specifies that: "if the subdivider is
required to expend one hundred twenty-five thousand dollars (~125,000) or more to
construct, improve, or finance the construction or improvement of public improvements
outside the property boundaries of the tentative map, excluding improvements of public rights-
of-way which abut the boundary of the property to be subdivided and which are reasonably
related to the development of that property, each filing of a final map shall extend the
expiration of the approved or conditionally apprOved tentative map by 36 months from the
date of its expiration or the date of the previously filed final map, whichever is later."
To date, the applicant has not met the following requirements for a three year extension of
time:
1. The filing of a final map
2. The filing of multiple final maps as part of a phased project
3. The expenditure of ~ 125,000
If, at the final map stage, the applicant meets the above requirements the three year extension
may be granted at that time. Consequently, the applicant's request for the three year
extension is inapplicable at this stage of the approval process.
New Conditions of Aooroval
The applicant feels that the adding of new conditions of approval to the project is
unwarranted, However, Public Works staff recommends that the approval of the extension
be subject to additional conditions as presented to the Planning Commission at the July 19,
1993 hearing, in compliance with the City's current standards and as required to protect the
general health and safety of the community.
R:~.S~STAFFRFT~9PA93.PC2 7/27/93 fie 2
Attachments:
Conditions of Approval - Blue Page
Previously Adopted Conditions of Approval - Blue Page
Exhibits - Blue Page
A. Vicinity Map
R:t,S~STAFFRFT~PAV3.PC2 7127/93 tie 3
ATTACHMENT NO. 6
JULY 19, i 993 AND AUGUST 2, 1993
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
R:%S'~STAFFRPT~BPA93.CC 8120/93 vgw 17
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: I COMMISSIONERS:
DRAFT
JULY 19.1993
None
Blair
2.2 Approval of June 21, 1993 Planning Commission Minutes-
It was moved by Commissioner Chiniaeff, seconded by Commissioner Hoegland
to approve the minutes of the June 7, 1993 Planning Commission meeting.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES:
4 COMMISSIONERS: Chiniaeff, Ford, Hoegland, Fahey
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: I COMMISSIONERS: Blair
NON-PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
Items No. 3 end No. 4 were presented to the Planning Commission jointly.
3. PA93-0009. First Extension of Time for Tentative Parcel Mao No. 25059
A proposal for a four lot subdivision of a 5.51 acre site in the Industrial Park (I-P) Zone.
Located on the westerly side of Ridge Park Drive, approximately 70 feet southerly of
Rancho California Road.
4. PA93-0010. Extension of Time for Plot Plan No. 34
A proposal"to construct a seven story office building (102,243 square feet), two
restaurants and (7,872 square feet and 7,000 square feet) on a four-level parking
structure (134,933 square feet) on 5.51 acres. Located on the westerly side of Ridge
Park Drive, approximately 70 feet southerly of Rancho California Road.
Anthony Polo, Avalon Consultants, 42200 HaCienda Drive, Murrieta, representing the
applicant, Preferred Equities Development Corporation, advised staff and the
Commission that there is an approved minor change on the map from October 1991
which is not reflected in the Conditions of Approval. Mr. Polo asked for clarification
regarding the length of the time extension. Mr. Polo stated that Ordinance 460 and
the Subdivision Map Act allows for a three year extension if the developer is
c~>nditioned to build $100,000 or more of off-site improvements. Mr. Polo stated that
this map is conditioned to build two signals off-site.
7121/93
PCMIN07119/93 -2-
It wasmoved by Commissioner Hoagland to continue this item for two weeks to allow
staff and the applicant an opportunity to.resolve their issues.
The motion failed due to lack of a second.
Principal Engineer Ray Casey advised the Commission that staff's interpretation of the
latest Subdivision Map Act, dictates that 3 year extensions are based on the first map
being recorded in a phased manner, which has not happened with this applicant.
Anthony Polo stated that the applicant has been conditioned to support the Western
By-Pass Corridor which the applicant approves of in general, however, the applicant
feels that the condition is not applicable because A) it has not been approved as part
of the General Plan and; B) because it has not been approved as part of the General
Plan the developer is concerned with any changes to the corridor. Mr. Polo stated that
the developer requests the right to oppose the proposed Western By-Pass Corridor
should it negatively impact the property. Mr. Polo stated that added conditions are
held to General Plan amendments or health and safety issues and the applicant does
not feel the multiple changes which he has been given address General Plan
amendments or health and safety issues.
Planning Director Gary Thornhill stated that the Western By-Pass Corridor is a
significant feature of the General Plan and the City Council and Planning Commission
have approved it by consensus.
Commissioner Chiniaeff suggested amending the condition to read "subject to the
adoption of the General Plan".
Director Thornhill advised that should the plan not be adopted, the Condition would not
be applicable.
Principal Engineer Ray Casey advised the Commission that staff has concerns regarding
erosion control and additional NPDS requirements. Mr. Casey stated that staff feels
these issues apply to the general health, safety and welfare.
I( was moved by Commissioner Hoagland, seconded by Commissioner Chiniaeff to
continue Item No. 3 and Item No. 4 to the meeting of August 2, 1993.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES:
4 COMMISSIONERS: Chiniaeff, Ford, Hoagland, Fahey
NOES:
0 COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: 1
COMMISSIONERS: Blair
PCMIN07/19193 -3- 7121/83
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
DRAFT
AUGUST ~. 1993
PA93-0009. First Extension of Time for Tentative Parcel MaD No. ~5059 end PA93-
0010. Extension of Time for Plot Plan No. 34
Proposal for s four lot subdivision of s 5.51 acre site in the Industrial Park (I-P) zone
and to construct a seven story office building (102,243 s.f.), two restaurants (7,872
s.f. and 7,000 s.f.) and a four-level parking structure.
This project was continued from the July 19, 1993 Planning Commission Meeting.
Planner Craig Ruiz presented the case.
Commissioner Chiniaeff inquired about the applicants expenditure of funds. Ray Casey
from the Department of Public Works, stated that no funds had been spent to date for
improvements or financing through an Assessment District.
The representative, Anthony Polo, Avalon Consultams, questioned Planning staff's
ability to add new conditions to the project. Mr. Polo also argued that the added
conditions did not relate to the health and safety of the citizens of Temecula nor to the
General Plan. In addition, Mr. Polo felt that because he was required to provide public
facilities which would cost in excess of $125,000 the project was entitled to athree
year extension of time.
Staff stated that the applicant did not meet the three requirements necessary to
receive a three year extension of time. The applicant had not (1) expanded $125,000,
(2) a final map was not recorded, and (3) the project was not part Of a phased final
map.
Commissioner Chiniaeff stated that the conditions added to the project were standard.
Assistant City Attorney John Cavanaugh stated that the City has the authority to
impose new conditions of approval to a previously approved tentative map through the
extension of time process.
It was moved by Commissioner Fahey, seconded by Commissioner Chiniaeff to
approve PA93-0009, first extension of time for Tentative Tract Map No. 25059 and
PA93-0101, First Extension of Time for Plot Plan No. 225.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES:
5 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Chiniaeff, Ford, Hoagland and Fahey
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
I~,SM=I, ANC~2,I3 9115f83.1~ 4
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: I COMMISSIONERS: Blair
DRAFT
JULY 19. 1993
2.2
Approval of June 21, 1993 Planning Commission Minutes.
It was moved by Commissioner Chiniaeff, seconded by Commissioner Hoagland
to approve the minutes of the June 7, 1993 Planning Commission meeting.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 4 COMMISSIONERS: Chiniaeff, Ford, Hoagland, Fahey
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: I COMMISSIONERS: Blair
NON-PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
Items No. 3 and No. 4 were presented to the Planning Commission jointly.
3. PA93-0009. First Extension of Time for Tentative Parcel Mao No. 25059
A proposal for a four lot subdivision of a 5.51 acre site in the Industrial Park (I-P) Zone.
Located on the westerly side of Ridge Park Drive, approximately 70 feet southerly of
Rancho California Road.
4. PA93-0010, Extension of Time for Plot Plan No. 34
A proposal"to construct a seven story office building (102,243 square feet), two
restaurants and (7,872 square feet and 7,000 square feet) on a four-level parking
structure (134,933 square feet) on 5.51 acres. Located on the westerly side of Ridge
Park Drive, approximately 70 feet southerly of Rancho California Road.
Anthony Polo, Avalon Consultants, 42200 HaCienda Drive, Murrieta, representing the
applicant, Preferred Equities Development Corporation, advised staff and the
Commission that there is an approved minor change on the map from October 1991
which is not reflected in the Conditions of Approval. Mr. Polo asked for clarification
regarding the length of the time extension. Mr. Polo stated that Ordinance 460 and
the Subdivision Map Act allows for a three year extension if the developer is
conditioned to build $100,000 or more of off-site improvements. Mr. Polo stated that
this map is conditioned to build two signals off-site.
7121
PCMIN0711 8193 -2-
DRAFT
I~ wasmoved by Commissioner Hoagland to aominue this item for two weeks to allow
staff and the applicant an opportunity to-resolve their issues.
The motion failed due to lack of a second.
Principal Engineer Ray Casey advised the Commission that staff's interpretation of the
latest Subdivision Map Act, dictates that 3 year extensions are based on the first map
being recorded in a phased manner, which has not happened with this applicant.
Anthony Polo stated that the applicant has been conditioned to support the Western
By-Pass Corridor which the applicant approves of in general, however, the applicant
feels that the condition is not applicable because A) it has not been approved as part
of the General Plan and; B) because it has not been approved as part of the General
Plan the developer is concerned with any changes to the corridor. Mr. Polo stated that
the developer requests the right to oppose the proposed Western By-Pass Corridor
should it negatively impact the property. Mr. Polo stated that added conditions are
held to General Plan amendments or health and safety issues and the applicant does
not feel the multiple changes which he has been given address General Plan
amendments or health and safety issues.
Planning Director Gary Thornhill stated that the Western By-Pass Corridor is a
significant feature of the General Plan and the City Council and Planning Commission
have approved it by consensus.
Commissioner Chiniaeff suggested amending the condition to read "subject to the
adoption of the General Plan".
Director Thornhill advised that should the plan not be adopted, the Condition would not
be applicable.
Principal Engineer Ray Casey advised the Commission that staff has concerns regarding
erosion control and additional NPDS requirements. Mr. Casey stated that staff feels
these issues apply to the general health, safety and welfare.
It was moved by Commissioner Hoagland, seconded by Commissioner Chiniaeff to
continue Item No. 3 and Item No. 4 to the meeting of August 2, 1993.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES:
4 COMMISSIONERS: Chiniaeff, Ford, Hoagland, Fahey
NOES:
0 COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: I
COMMISSIONERS: Blair
PCMIN0711 gl93 -} 7121 t13 ~'~'
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
DRAFT
AUGUST ~. 1993
PA93-O009. First Fxtension of Time for Tentative Parcel MaD No. ~5059 end PA93-
0010. Extension of Time for Plot Plan No. 34
Proposal for · four lot subdivision of a 5.51 acre site in the Industrial Park (I-P) zone
and to construct a seven story office building (102,243 s.f.), two restaurants (7,872
s.f. and 7,000 s.f.) and a four-level parking structure.
This project was continued from the July 19, 1993 Planning Commission Meeting.
Planner Craig Ruiz presented the case.
Commissioner Chinieeff inquired about the applicants expenditure of funds. Ray Casey
from the Department of Public Works, stated that no funds had been spent to date for
improvements or financing through an Assessment District.
The representative, Anthony Polo, Avalon Consultants, cluestioned Planning staff's
ability to add new conditions to the project. Mr. Polo also argued that the added
conditions did not relate to the health and safety of the citizens of Temecula nor to the
General Plan. In addition, Mr. Polo felt that because he was recluired to provide public
facilities which would cost in excess of $125,000 the project was entitled to a three
year extension of time.
Staff stated that the applicant did not meet the three requirements necessary to
receive a three year extension of time. The applicant had not (1) expanded $125,000,
(2) a final map was not recorded, and (3) the project was not part of a phased final
map.
Commissioner Chiniaeff stated that the conditions added to the project were standard.
Assistant City Attorney John Cavanaugh stated that the City has the authority to
impose new conditions of approval to a previously approved tentative map through the
extension of time process.
It was moved by Commissioner Fahey, seconded by Commissioner Chiniaeff to
approve PA93-0009, first extension of time for Tentative Tract Map No. 25059 and
PA93-0101, First Extension of Time for Plot Plan No. 225.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES:
5 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Chiniaeff, Ford, Hoagland and Fahey
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
Ik~P,.ANCOMIdUq3dlNB-2.B3 1115/i3.1ie 4
ATTACHMENT NO. 7
EXHIBITS
R:~S%STAFFRP'P, gPA93.CC 9120/93 vow 18
CITY OF TEMECULA
· RANCH~. ~ ~"' ~,,,,~,],,.5' ~-~',,x~,
JOB
SITE ' ~
VICI
CASE NO.: PA93-0009
EXHIBIT: A
P.C. DATE: SEPTEMBER 20, 1993
VICINITY MAP
R:~S~STAFFRP'I'~gPA93,CC 9120/93 vgw
19
ITEM
NO.
18
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROV/A_~
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning~2'2'~' '
September 28, 1993
Status Report on the Regulation of Vending Carts
RECOMMENDATION: Provide direction to staff on the regulation of vending carts.
BACKGROUND:
This item was continued from September 14, 1993, because representatives of the Old Town
Merchants Association were not present.
HOGAND\VI~IDC. ART.CC2 1
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPRO~
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Gary Thornhill, Director of Plann|ng,
September 14, 1993
Status Report on the Regulation of Vending Carts
PREPARED BY:
David W. Hogan, Associate Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
Provide direction to staff on the regulation of vending carts.
BACKGROUND:
On August 24, 1993, the Old Town Merchants Association addressed the Council concerning
the vending cart near the intersection of Front and Main Streets. The merchants requested
that the City provide additional regulations to control vending carts and that no additional
permits be issued. As a result, the Council directed staff to review the issue and to provide
options as to how the City could regulate and/or control vending carts.
DISCUSSION:
Reaulation of Vendina Carts
Because of the ambiguity of the City's zoning ordinance (Ordinance 348), relative to this
issue, the only requirement for vendors to operate is with the issuance of a City business
license. However, the business license program has little land use regulatory authority. Its'
primary purpose is to ensure that local businesses operate in conformance with other City
regulations.
Although Ordinance 348 does not have any specific provisions dealing with vending carts,
there are two permit processes which could be used to more strongly regulate vending carts
on private property. The two permitting options are the use of Plot Plans in commercial zones
and the use of Minor Outdoor Event .Permits. In the past, the City has approved similar
recurring activities, such as the Farmers Market, with Minor Outdoor Event Permits.
Vendine Carts and the Old Town Specific Plan
The draft Specific Plan for Old Town Temecula which was approved by the Old Town Steering
Committee and the City Planning Commission contains provisions which would permit vending
carts within the public right-of-way in Old Town.
~!OGAND~VENDCART.CCI 1
The draft Specific Plan contains provisions which:
· Allows the Planning Director to determine the locations where carts would be allowed;
· Sets standards for the operation of the business utilizing the vending cart; and,
Requires that all vending carts have a Vending Permit |approved by the Building and
Safety, Finance, Planning, and Public Works Departments).
Staff is 'currently working with the Old Town Merchants Association to address the
Associations' concerns with vending carts. The Merchants Association recommendations will
be presented for the Councils consideration when the Old Town Specific Plan is considered.
In addition, it is the intent of staff to include vending carts into fie new Development Code
which is currently under development and will be presented to the Council in early 1994.
OPTIONS:
The following are options as to how the Council could address the regulation of vending carts.
If it is the intent of the Council to allow vending carts without regulation; then
it is recommended that the current system be continued.
If it is the intent of the Council to allow vending carts with some regulation;
then it is recommended that Minor Outdoor Event Permits be required for all
vending carts. This option could include requiring that all existing vending carts
obtain a Plot Plan or Minor Outdoor Event Permit.
If it is the intent of the Council to not allow any additional vending carts; then
it is recommended that no additional licenses or permits be issued for vending
carZs.
If it is the intent of the Council to not allow ~ny vending carts; then it is
recommended that no additional licenses or permits for vending carts be issued
and that all existing carts be removed or abated.
~HOOAND~VmqDC~Fr. CC~ 2
ITEM NO. 19
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
June S. Greek, City Clerk
September 28, 1993
Referendum - Ordinance No. 93-13
RECOMMENDATION:
Receive and File the City Clerk's Certificate of Sufficiency.
Provide instruction to staff on the desired future course of action·
BACKGROUND:
At the City Council meeting of July 27, 1993, Ordinance No. 93-13 was adopted amending
the official zoning map for a Change of Zone application which was contained in Planning
Application No. PA93-0043. This changed the zone from rural residential to C-P-S (Scenic
Highway Commercial) on property located on the southeast corner of Ynez and Winchester
Roads. On August 24, 1993, a referendum petition, which seeks to place the matter of the
zoning on the ballot, containing 2,404 signatures was presented to the City Clerk.
The petitions were delivered by the City Clerk to the Riverside County Registrar of Voters on
August 26, 1993 for verification· The County Registrar conducted a 100% validation of
signatures up to 1,450 signatures· The required number of valid signatures required was
1,444 which represents 10% of the 14,439 registered voters in the City.
Several options are available to the City Council as a result of the verification of the
referendum petitions. The City Council may:
Direct the City Clerk to submit the ordinance to the voters at the next regular
municipal election.
e
Direct the City Clerk to submit the ordinance to the voters at a special election,
which could be held no sooner than 88 days after the order of the Council.
R:~geele.rl~t~Refefe~dum 1
Agenda Repo~
Referendum- Ordinance 93-13
Page 2.
3. Repeal the ordinance.
Ootion No. I Should the City Council choose the first option, the cost as projected by the
Riverside County Registrar's office would be approximately $21,080.94, based on a charge
of $1.46 per registered voter. As with all consolidated elections, the City would incur some
additional costs such as advertising and miscellaneous administrative costs. A conservative
estimate for the total cost would be $24,000.
Ootion No. 2 The second option, submitting the question to the voters at a special election,
would present two choices. The first would be to schedule a special election at the earliest
possible date and hold a "stand alone" election, which would not be consolidated with a
County-wide election. I have researched the cost of using all City staff, and working through
a private elections firm for printing of the ballots, absentee ballots, voters pamphlet, setting
up counting equipment, miscellaneous election supplies and translations. The cost of this type
of election would be approximately $34,000., in hard costs, not including City personnel
costs. If the City were to hold a special election and request the County Registrar's Office
to conduct it, the cost would be approximately $2.91 per registered voter or $42,017.49.
Ootion No. 3 If the City Council chose the third option, there would be no election costs,
however, the Elections Code provides that if the ordinance is repealed, the City Council
cannot reenact the ordinance for a period of one year (EC 4055).
Regardless of the option taken, the City Council cannot reenact the ordinance for one year
from the date of either its repeal by the legislative body or disapproval by the voters.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The fiscal impacts as presented in the discussion portion of this report would be dependent
upon the action taken by the City Council.
ATTACHMENTS:
Certificate of Sufficiency
Ordinance No. 93-13
JSG
R:~eeende~n~efeendum 2
CITY OF TEM! CIILA
1989
CERTIFICATE OF SUFFICIF~NCY
State of California)
County of Riverside) ss.
City of Temecula )
I,/LINE S. GIH:-~K, City Clerk of the City of Temecuh, State of California, do hereby certify
as follows concerning the petition entitled REFERENDUM AGAINST ORDINANCE NO. 93-13
which was submitted to the office of the City Clerk of the City of Temecula on August 24,
1993.
That upon examination of said petition by the RegisWar of Voters of the County of Riverside,
it was found to contain 2,404 total signatures of which 1,450 signatures were found to be valid
and 455 insufficient. The remaining 499 signatures were not checked having ruched the
requisite amount of valid signatures.
Further, that said number of valid signatures, 1450, exceeds the number required for sufficiency,
which number is 1,444, consitituting 10% of the 14,439 registered voters in the City of
Temecula as of the date of the applicable report, dated February 11, 1993, to the Secretary of
State concerning the number of registered voters in the jurisdiction.
Dated:
September 24, 1993
J u~. '~'ree k~C~t~k'° ~')
42174 bUSINESS PAI~K DRIVE * TEAeCULA. CALIFORNIA 9t25c]0 · PHONE (714) 694-1989 · FAX (714) 694-1999
ORDINANCE NO. 93-13
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF T[IF~ CITY
OF TEMECULA, AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING
MAP OF ~ CITY FOR THE CHANGE OF ZONE
APPLICATION CONTAINED INPLANNING APPLICATION
NO. PA93-0043, CHANGING THE ZONE-FROM R-R
(RURAL RF, SID~) TO C-P-S (SCENIC mGHWAY
COMMERCIAL) ON PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE
SOFIIIEAST CORNER OF YNEZ AND WINCHESTER
ROADS, AND KNOWN AS PORTIONS OF ASSESSOR'S
PARC~ NUMBERS 910-130-046 AND 910-130-047.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF T~iF, CULA, STATE OF
C,&IJFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Public hearings have been held before the Plnnning Commission and City
Council of the City of Temead~, State of California, pursuant to tlz Planning and Zoning law
of the'State of California, and the City Code of the City of Temec-i~= The zoning district as
shown on the attached exhibit is hereby approved and ratified as part of the Official Zoning Map
for the City of Temecula as adopted by the City and as may be nmended hereafter from time to
time by the City Council of the City of Temecula, and the City of Temecula Official Zoning
Map is amended by placing in effect the zone or zones as ~ in P!nnning Application No.
PA93-0043 (Change of Zone) and in the above ti~e, and as shown on zoning map attached
hereto and incorponted herein.
Section 2. Notice of Ad~ptlon. Within 10 days after the adoption hereof, the City Clerk
of the City of Temecula shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and cause it to be posted
in at least three public places in the City.
Section 3. Taldng l~.ffect. This ordinance shall take effect 30 days after the date of its
adoption.
Section 4. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Ordinance.
Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 27th day of July, 1993.
ATTEST:
G~Ci~~rk
e'S~ *' ~ ~
[SEAL]
./' J. Sal Mtioz, Mayor
5~rds~3-13 I
STATB OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
city O~'r~v~CULA)
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, H~:~aY DO CERTIFY that the
foregoing Ordinance No. 93-13 was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular
raceling of the City Council on the 13th day of July, 1993, and that ~, said Ordinance
was duly adopted and passed a regular meeting of the City -Council on the 27~h day of July, 1993
by the following roll call vote:
AYES: 3 COUNTERS: Birdsall, Parks,
NOES: 1 COUNCH,MRMBERS: Stone
ABSENT: 1 COUNCH...MR~MBERS: Mmloz
S~>rds~3-13 2
!i
CITY OF TEMECULA
i|
SC
CASE NO.: PA93-0043
F"vHIBIT: L
, -,.;. DATE: JUNE 7, 1993
CHANGE OF ZONE
ITEM 20
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning~')/
September 28, 1993
Approval Authority Matrix
RECOMMENDATION: Provide direction to staff relative to amendments to the existing
Ordinance.
BACKGROUND:
This item was continued from the September 14, 1993 City Council Meeting.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
R:\S\STAFFRFr~APP-AUTH.CC3 9120193 tie
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY A'I'FORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager.
Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning ~/'~'
September 14, 1993
Discussion of Approval Authority Ordinance
Prepared By:
Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning
RECOMMENDATION:
Provide direction to staff relative to amendments to the existing
ordinance.
BACKGROUND
At the City Council meeting of August 24, 1993 the Council requested staff to place this
matter on the agenda for discussion. Because of concerns expressed over the approval
process for a proposed mini-market/gas station, the Council decided to re-examine the
approval authority for this and other potentially controversial uses being proposed.
DISCUSSION
The City Council, in an attempt to streamline the approval process for development projects,
approved Ordinance No. 92-14 on May 26, 1992. This ordinance, as reflected in the attached
Approval Authority Matrix (see Attachment No. 1 ), authorized the Planning Commission and
staff to approved certain projects, depending upon the scale and complexity of the proposal,
that were previously considered at the Council level.
However, in delegating this authority down to the lower levels, the Council desired to retain
the ability to appeal any decision of the staff or Planning Commission. Consequently,
language was included in the ordinance which provided that any councilmember could appeal
a decision within the required 10 day appeal period simply by contacting staff and requesting
that the item be placed on a future council agenda for consideration.
Attachments: 1.
2.
Approval Authority Matrix - Page 2
Staff Report (May 26, 1992) - Page 3
R:~rAFFRPT~PPAUTH.CC2 9f3~93 kJb 1
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
APPROVAL AUTHORITY MATRIX
R:~S~'TAFFRPT~PPAUTH.CC2 9~/93 I 2
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
ITEM
ertificate of Compliance
Change of ZonelOrdinence Amendment.
Conditional Use Permit {Existing Building)
Conditional Use Permit INot in Existing Building)
Final Map
General Plan Amendment
Parcel Merger
Lot Line Adjustment
Parking Adjustment
Plot Plan for Antennae end Off-Site Advertising
APPROVAL AUTHORITY "EXHIBIT A"
STAFF *PLAN. DIRECTOR *PLAN.
· · * · COMMISSION
X
X
°CITY
COUNCIL
Recommendation X
X
X
X
X
Recommendation
13.
14.
11. Plot Plan Under' l 0,000 Sq. Ft.
Exempt from CEQA
12. Plot Plan Under 10,000 Sq. Ft.
Non Exempt from CEQA
Plot Plan Over 10.000 Sq. Ft.
Public Use Permit Under 10,000 Sq. Ft.
Exempt from CEQA.
r~ublic Use Permit Under 10,000 Sq. Ft.
Non Exempt from CEQA.
16. Public Use Permit Over 10,000 Sq. Ft.
17. Reversion to Acreage
18. Second Dwelling Unit Permit
19. Special Care Facility
20. Sl~ecific Plan/Amendment
21. Substantial Conformance
22. Temporary Use Permit (Under 6 Months}
23. Temporary Use Permit (Over 6 Months}
24. Tentative Parcel Map (Residential
Less that 5 Lots)
Tentative Parcel Map (Commercial/industrial)
Tentative Tract Map (More than 5 Lots)
Time Extension - City Approve Projects
Time Extension - County Approved Projects
25.
26.
27.
28.
2*q- Variance
2
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Recommendation X
X
X
X
X
:ed Public Hearing. 300 Ft. for Ranning Director Approval, 600 Ft. for Ranning Commission and City Council Approval.
·' ~ne Planning Director may refer any matter assigned to the Director or Staff to the Planning Commission.
SLSTAFFRPT~PPAUTH.CCx
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
STAFF REPORT (MAY 26, 1992)
R:~X,~FA~PPA'JTH.CC'2 9/3~)3 kJb 3
APPROVAL
~TY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF~
AGENDA RRP0RT
City Council/City Manager-
Plaun~ug Department
May 26, 1992
Approval Authority Ordinance
RECOMMENDATION:
BACKGROUND
The Planning Department Staff recommends that the City Council
adopt Ordinance No. 92:, upholding the Planning Commi~on's
approval of an ordinance regulating the approval of land u~e
regulations.
In response to past concerns expressed to Staff by the Council relative to speeding up the
processing of development applications, Staff initiated an amendment to the' existing approval
ordinance which staff believes will substantially reduce processing time for a number of project
types.
Under County processing requirements, projects (depending on their scale) wer~ approvable by
either Staff, Planning Director with public heating, Planning Commission, or the Board of
Supervisors. When the City incorporated December, 1989, the City Council amended the
County procedures.
When the City formed the Planning Commission in June of 1990, approvals were largely
advisory to the Council.
In August of 1990, the Council adopted Ordinance No. 90-19, which outlined approval authority
for all development proposals, (see Attachment 4). This ordinance still did not provide for
Planning Director approvals of discretionary projects and only allowed the Planning Commission
to approve relatively minor projects.
/"' -~'~'TA~PPAUTH.CCx I
The Planning Commission ~ r~vi~w~i de~veloprnent applications for tlz last 20 months. In
addition, consultant Planning Staff has b~n r~placed by City employ~s. Cons~u~nfly, th~
level of both CommissiOn and Staff experience has risen to a point where additional approval
authority is warranted.
Prior to scheduling the' proposed changes to the approval' authority ordinance, Staff presented
the revisions to both the City Coordinntlng Committee and the Economic Development
Committee. Both committees were enthusiastic about the proposed changes and felt that their
implementation would result in substantially improved processing times.
At their January 27, 1992 meeting, the Planning Commission recommended some revisions be ·
made. Planning Commissionen' recommendations on Matrix #1 (page 8) were made as shown
on Matrix ~r2.
Item numbers 3, 18, 22, 23, 24, and 27, on Matrix #1, were moved from Director approval to
Commission approval and are referenced as the numbers 3, 19, 24, 25, 26, and 29 as shown on
Matrix//2.
Item no. 8, on Matrix #1, was moved to Staff approval from Director approval
Item No. 21, on Matrix #1, was revised to require temporary use permits beyond six months
to be approved by the Commission. The commission then continued the matter to February 3rd,
for consideration of the revised Approval Authority Matrix with their recommended changes,
and recommended adoption of the proposed amendments to the Council.
FISCAL EVIPACT
None
Attachments:
Approval .Authority Matrix
(PInning Commission Recommended) - page 3
Ordinance No 92-__ - page 5
Planning Commission minutes of January 27 and February 3, 1992 - page 9
Planning Commission Staff packet, January 27, 1992, with the Planning Staff
recommended matrix attached - page 10
Later of support, Temecula, Mumeta EDC dated January 23, 1992 - page 11
vgw
ATrA~ NO. 1
AI'PROVAL AUTHORtrY MATRIX
$%.$TAFFRPT%AP~Airf!~.{~Cx 3
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
'10.
APPROVAL
erti~cate of Compliance
Change of ZonelOrd)trance Amendment.
Conditional Use Permit {Existing Bulkling)
CondITional Use Pennit (Not in Existing Building)
Final Map
General Plan Amendment
Parcel Merger
Lot Line Adjustment
Perking Adjuatmont
Plot Plan for Antennae end Off-Site Advertising
AUTHORITY
STAFF
X
"EXHIBIT A"
"'PLAN. DIRECTOR 'PLAN.
ee COMMISSION
X
*CITY
COUNCIL
Recenmendotion X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
11.
12.
13.
14.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23,
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
2o
5,~-~
Plot Plan Under 10,000 Sq. Ft. Exempt from CEQA
Plot Plan Under 10,000 SO. Ft. Non Exempt from CEQA
Plot Plan Over 10,000 SO.Ft.
Public Use Permit Under 10,000 SO. Ft.
Exempt from CEQA.
?ublic Use Permit Under 10,000 Sq. Ft.
Non Exempt from CEQA.
Public Use Permit Over 10,000 Sq. Ft.
Reversion to Acreage
Second Dwelling Unit Permit
Special Care Facility
Specific Plan/Amendment"
Substantial Conformance
Temporary Use Permit IUnder 6 Months)
Temporary Use Permit (Over 6 Months)
Tentative Parcel Map (Residential Less that 5 Lots)
Tentative Parcel Map (Commercial/industrial)
Tentative Tract Map {More then 5 Lots)
Time Extension - City Approved Projects
Time Extension - County Approved Projects
Variance
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Recommendation X
X
X
X
X
:ed Public Hearing, 300 Ft. for Ptanning Director Approval, 600 Ft. for Planning Commission and City Council Approval.
· ne Planning Director may refer any matter assigned to the Director or Staff to the Planning Commission.
S'~I'A~PPAUTH.C{~ 4
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
ORDINANCE N0.92-__
S,%b-fA~I~eA,,J-fH.CCx 6
ORDINANCE NO. 92-1~2
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TRY. CrrY
OF TEMECULA I~EFEAr-~IG ORDINANCE NO. 90-19 AND
ESTABY-Bn:rrNG DECISION-MAKING 'AlYrHORrrY FOR
SUBDIVISION AND LAND USE APPIZCATION$ '
WHEREAS, on December 1, 1989, the City of Temecttla was extabli~ed ~ a duly
organized municipal corporation of the State of California;
WNEREAS, pursuant to City Ordinance No. 90-04, the City adopted certain portions
of the non-codified Riverside County Ordinances, including Ordinance No. 348 ('Land Use
Code') and Ordinance No. 460 (*Subdivision Use Code*-) for the City of Tcmecula; .
'Wl:nmR,s,S, on October 9, -1990, the City Council of the City of Temecuh adopted
Ordinance No. 90-19 establishing decision-rv=lcing authority for subdivision .and land use
applications in order to provide for a smooth transition from the County of Riverside to the City
of Temecuh involving such land use applications;
WHEREAS, in recognition of the faa that most land use applications are now originating
in the City of Temecula, it is the desire of the City Council to maine more efficient and to
establish a line of authority for the review and appwval process involving development
applications.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY .COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TE1VIE~A
DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLI~WS:
Section 1.
is hereby repealed;
Ordinance No. 90-19, adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula
Section 2. Riverside County Ordinance No. 348 and Ordinance No. 460, as adopted
by City Ordinance No. 90-04, are hereby amended to adopt the development application
procedures identified in Exhibit "A", attached hereto. '--
Section 3. Where combined development applications are submitted for consideration,
to the extent any portion of the application would be considered for appwval by the highest
reviewing body, as set forth in Section 2, then the entire combined application shall be
considered by the reviewing body.
Section 4. Any application for extension of an approved tentative map, parcel map,
or vesting tentative map considered in accordance with the procedures conned herein shall pay
the same fee as if the application were for the original map approval.
5lOrds92-14 -I-
-/
Section 5. Any interested person may file an appeal to a final decision by the
Planning Commission to the City Council. Together with the applicable filing fee establish~
by Resolution of the City Council, such appeal must be filed with the City Clerk within ten (10)
days of the date the matmr was decided by the Planning C. omrn!-~-ion. For purposes of this
Section, any City Council member may appeal a decision by the Planning Commission without
payment of any fee 'for the appeal.
Section 6. Except as otherwise provided therein, any other land division or
development application may be submitted to the City Planning Director for approval. If the
Planning Director determines that the proposed application is comparable to one of the approvals
described in Section 2, he shall direct that such application be submitted to either the Planning
Commission or City Council for consideration pursuant to the procedures set forth at Section 2.
Section 7. To the extent the provisions of Ordinance Nos. ~8 and 460 are not
supexseded by the provisions of this City Ordinance, including notice and hearing requiremems,
said remaining provisions shall remain effective.
Section 8. The City Clerk shall certify as to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause
copies of this Ordinance to be posted and published as required by law.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 9th day of lun~, 1992.
Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor
ATTEST:
June~Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
510~[s~1-14
-2-
STATE OF CATJI=ORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CrrY OF TEMECULA)
I, June S. Greek, City Cl~rk of the City of Temecula, do hel-e, by certify that the
foregoing Ordinance No. 92-14 was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular
meeting of the City Council on the 26th 'day of May, 1992, and that the, said Ordinance
was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 9th day of June,
1992, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: 5
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 0
COUN~M]JERS:
COUNCII,Mlt~KIIS:
COUNCILI~-M]JERS:
Lindemans, Moore, Parks, Munoz,
Birdsall
None
None
City Cie~k
5/Or~s92-14
-3-
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
The Planning Commission
Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning
January 27, 1992
Approval Authority Ordinance
The attached approval authority matrix, if approved, would provide for more expedient
processing of applications by City Staff. The proposed revisions and their effect are
summarized below:
Conditional Use Permits (C.U.P.'s) in an existing building (T.I) would be approvable by
the Director rather than the Planning Commission,
Public Use Permits (P.U.P.'s) under 10,000 square feet in size and exempt from CEQA
would be approvable by Staff (Director); P.U.P.'s and P.P. under 10,000 square feet
and not exempt from CEQA would be approvable by the Director (with a public
hearing); P.U.P.'s and plot plans over 10,000 square feet would be approvable by the
Planning Commission. Currently, all P.U.P.'s and plot plans require Planning
Commission approval and/or City Council (in excess of 50,000 square feet) approval.
Second dwelling units would be approvable by the Director with public hearing, rather
than the Planning Commission, per current ordinance.
Substantial Conformance determinations would be approvable by the Director, rather
than Planning Commission.
All commercial and industrial parcel maps and residential parcel maps would be
approvable by the Director at a public hearing. At the present time, the Commission
approves all tentative parcel maps (T.P.M.'s) under 20 acres in size; the Council
approves all T.P.M.'s in excess of 20 acres,
All tentative tract maps would have final approval by the Planning Commission,
regardless of size. Currently, the same criteria as stated above in item 6 applies to
approvals.
The Planning Commission
Approval Authority
Page 2
7. Time extension requests on maps, P.U.P.'s, plot plans, and C,U.P.'s previously
approved by the City would be approvable by the Director with public hearing, Time
extension requests on applications siSproved by the County would require Planning
Commission approval. Currently, time extension requests are approvable by the
Commission and/or Council depending on the size of the project.
The net effect of instituting these changes would, in Staff's opinion, result in a measurable
decrease in processing times; for affected applications, this could amount to four weeks or
more in some cases.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Banning Commission recommend approval of Ordinance
No. 92-_, an interior Ordinance regulating the approval of land
use regulations.
vgw
0
u
)-
I--
x X X X
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
OF
JANUARY 27 AND FEBRUARY 3, 1992
s~s~^~'~,r~,~,^tm4.ccx 10
ATTACHMENT NO. 4
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF PACKET
DATED
JANUARY 27, 1992
WITH PLANNING STAFF RECOMMENDED MATRIX ATTACHED
ATTACHMENT NO. 5
LETTER OF SUPPORT
TEMECULA, MURRIETA EDC
DATED
JANUARY 23, 1992
s~rA~-~-~A~,^~r~.cc,= 12
ITEM NO.
21
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
City Clerk
September 28, 1993
Community Services Commission Appointment
RECOMMENDATION: Review the Ad-Hoc Committee recommendations and appoint one
applicant to serve a full three-year term on the Temecula Community Services Commission.
BACKGROUND: Pursuant to Council's adopted policy and procedure for making
appointments and re-appointments, the soon to expire term of Commissioner William D Hillin
was advertised in two local newspapers of general circulation. The applications received were
forwarded to the Council's Ad-Hoc committee members for the Community Services
Commission, and Councilmembers Birdsall and Stone have recommended the appointment
of Jeff Comerchero.
Attached are copies of the applications which were received by the filing deadline of
September 5, 1993.
ATTACHMENTS: Copies of Applications for Appointment
CITY OF TEMECULA AIj'.2· 1 ~ '~:-:. 3E
APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO COMMISSIO
Qualification Requirement: Resident of City of Temecula
COMMISSION ON WHICH YOU WISH TO SERVE:~ '
OCCUPATION: '. ~C ~ ~. "
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND/DEGREES: ~(Y [ '
.~....
,,~ ;~ ~ ~,'~ ~
~2'EARs RESIDENT
OF TEMECULA: ?
WORK PHONE: ;~/,_,~/~ ~
LIST ANY RIVERSIDE COUNTY OR OTHER CITY COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION ON WHICH
YOU HAVE SERVED AND THE YEAR OF SERVICE: .... :' -' =:~*~*'--":.' ;- - ' --. '-:'*
ORGANIZATIONS TO WHICH YOU BELONG: {Professional, technical, community, Service): ...:-
* eRIEFLY STATE WHY YOU 'wiSH .l~.o_$;nvc-o~lq,~'~-'uMM,b~loN, AND WHY YOU := ~-**:~.-.---'~
BELI~ YOU ARE QUAUFIED ~OR THE POSmON. ': BE SPECIFIC ~use' add~'nd*p~r 'ff ~-:;:~-~:~::
. · . -,. . - , ~ .~;, --,: -, - .... ._ .~, .: ,.- ...._ - . ~._ - -:: ":~::~-/- ~'~-
:. .... __ , ~ .-, .... _ .... ,, .; .... . , ,. . ...... . **_~ ............ . ........ ~, ~ , ~, , ~ ,,
. , . - , ,,*--':, *:'~:*'-- - '-7 .- , ;*' ~-~ ' ; ' ...... ' -. * ' ~,.
.. - , , , -,, - * _ ~ ~:~,~.~ .,~.:
,
. ,-'~: ~*. ..... -~.,..-- .-.-. ..,-:.,-.:-~.~:,,,~:_'~ *:::~: ~.*
P~SE NO~~~L il ~ ke~ on ~ for ~nsMe~ d ~re vamc~,. -. ...' _ :2: . -
Retum to: City Clerk's Office, 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula, CA92390 (714) 694-1989 ....
2/fomm/COM-O01 ' - ........
CITY OFTEMECULA COMMISS~N -.o,: 2 ~':':' ~i --
APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO
!aB~ ~
· ~, ,
Qualification Requirement: Resident of City of Temecul
COMMISSION ON WHICH YOU WISH TO SERVE:
Community Services Commission
NAME: Jeff Comerchero YEARS RESIDENT
ADDRESS:
41981 Avertida Vista Ladera
HOME PHONE:
699-6061
OCCUPATION:
Manufacturer f s Representative
EMPLOYER/ADDRESS:
1368 Lincoln Avenue, San Rafael, CA 94901
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND/DEGREES:
OF TEMECULA:
4 1/2
WORK PHONE:
699-6475
1967 - BA Sociology
LIST ANY RIVERSIDE COUNTY OR OTHER CITY COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION ON WHICH
YOU HAVE SERVED AND THE YEAR OF SERVICE:
ORGANIZATIONS TO WHICH YOU BELONG: (Professional, technical, community, service):
BRIEFLY STATE WHY YOU WISH TO SERVE ON THIS COMMISSION, AND WHY YOU '
BELIEVE YOU ARE QUALIFIED FOR THE POSITION. BE SPECIFIC (Use additional paper if
necessary): · ,. "- ,.,
I have a stong belief that one has a duty to serve their community in some
capacity. I have two young sons who enjoy the parks in this area and "-'
I have been very active for a number of years in local sports (softball
for adults, etc. ) I feel my previous experience in coaching and
as a participant as well as my business expertise as a self-employed
representative for several major international toy manufacturers gives
me some good insight into this area. ': - · .... :' '- '
I understand that any or all information on this form may be verified. I consent to the release of this ': :'
information for pu it,/purpose :'
SIGNATU~,.~ ~ DATE: 8/26/93
Return
/
2/formslCOM-OO1
Office, 43174 Business Perk Drive, Temecula, CA 92390 (714) 694-1 9~/~
ITEM N O. 2 2
TELEPHONE MESSAGE
TO:
FROM:
City Council
Dave Dixon
Leanna Bradley
Supervisor Buster's Office
275-1010
DATE: Sept. 13, 1993
SUB J: Health Clinic
You are invited to attend a meeting in Supervisor Buster's
Temecula office on Thursday, September 23, at 2:00 p.m.
to discuss opening a community medical clinic. The head
of public health and Dr. Novotney will be there.
Sue Steffen
[Previous correspondence on the subject is attached for the
City. Council's review].
HEALTHCARE
M U R R I E T A
August 31, 1993
Honorable Sal Munoz, Mayor
Ciry of Temecula
Temecula City Hall
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
Dear Sal,
As you know, Sharp HealthCare Murrieta is working with several agencies to bring a much
needed Community Clinic to the County Administration Center in Temecula. h is clear that in
order to accomplish our goal we will have to have support from the cities and various
community groups to raise the funds required to open the doors. I am, therefore, attaching a
proposal outlining what we hope to accomplish and by this letter, am requesting your assistance
in bringing to the City Council our petition for a $35,000 grant that will assist us in meeting our
goal.
We clearly recognize that the current economic situation makes funds scarce, however, the
services that a coininanity clinic would make available, do not now exist on a "no cost" or
"sliding scale" basis for the homeless, the anin-~u'ed citizens or for employees of the many small
businesses in this area who provide less than adequate insurance.
I would be pleased to meet with you or other members of the Council personally and an-~wer any
questions if you feel that would be appropriate.
Thanks in advance for any help you might be able to give in this matter.
Sincerely,
' L
"JVice t? ~dent ~s
CC:David Dixon/'
Senior Vice Presidem Edwards
(9091 696-6000 25500 Medical Center Drive MmTieu. CA 92562-9972
PROPOSAL
EPISCOPAL CO1VIMUN1TY SERVICES
SHARP HEALTHCARE MURIHETA
Background:
Sharp HealthCare Murrieta ("Sharp"), in cooperation with Episcopal Community Services
CECS"), the County of Riverside, City of Murrieta, and City of Temecula, proposes to establish
a community health center to provide primary medical care for the soulher part of Riverside
County. It is proposed to utilize the newly constructed facility in the Walt Abraham County
Administration Center in Temecula. Among the services to be provided are: general medical,
pediatric, gynecology, well-child exams, immunizations, prevention of communicable diseases,
and other medical needs of the current uninsured/tmderinsured population in the region.
Partners:
Sharp is part of the Sharp HealthCare system, a San Diego based non-for-profit organization.
The Sharp HealthCare network includes five hospitals, four skilled nursing facilities, 13 clinics
and numerous allied health care facilities. Sharp opened a 49-bed acute care hospital in Mun-icta
in February, 1992, as the fast phase of what is to become a major medical center in the years
ahead. Sharp recently announced that a 151-bed facility will be built on the present site and will
be opened by late 1996.
ECS is a large, multi-faceted human services agency that provides health care, chemical
dependency prevention, treatment and recovery, child development, housing, job training,
counseling, and emergency services. Services are rendered to the homeless, the working poor,
children in poverty, children with developmental deficiencies, the underinsured, the unemployed,
the mentally ill, the chemically dependent, the illiterate, displaced workers, and the general
public. The agency has more than 30 services sites and has been providing services for over
60 years.
Need:
At present, the cities of Murrieta and Temecula do not have clinical facilities within their
boundaries to service the populations delineated above. Those who cannot afford the services
of a physician because of poverty or lack of insurance do not receive preventive treatment and
must often seek out the emergency department of the two acute care hospitals within reach, even
when the illness does not fall under the category of emergency care. This is costly care and
poor use of emergency facilities. It often prevents or seriously delays access to emergency
facilities for those with true emergency needs. Because emergency facilities do not offer such
services as prenatal exams and instruction, immunizations, and/or the treatment of chronic
illness, low income community members often go unattended and untreated. The proposal for
this new primary care clinic will mitigate this situation. Under the leadership of Sharp, the
cooperating agencies are seeking the resources needed to make this clinic a reality.
Services to be Provided:
Women, infants and children
Perinatal services
Care during pregnancy
Delivery by local obstetrician
Post-partum care for both mothers and infants
Pediatric specialty care
Child health and disability prevention programs
Monitoring developmental deficiencies
Treatment of primary care level problems
Programs for indigent children
Pediatric nutrition counseling
Medical evaluation programs for women, infants, and children
Pregnancy counseling/~-n]nccolo~y
Educational programs
Medical care
Referrals
Internal medicine for adult care of chronic and/or acute medical conditions
Preventive services
Immunizations
HIV testing and counseling
Health education
TB skin testing
Nutrition counseling
For the HIV positive
For adults with chronic ailments
To prevent or stop negative health habits
smm~vnq93~pigo~d.oo~ ~,ge 2
For partners with developmentally impaired children
Homeless health care
Cast management
Assistance with supplies of food, clothes, blankets
Referrals
Outcome Objectives:
The presence of the proposed clinic at the County Administration Building will serve the citizens
of Murrieta, Temecula, and surrounding communities with the following expected outcomes:
It will bring into full operation a County facility originally intended to serve the
community but presently being used at a minimum level due to lack of County funding.
It will provide a conveniently located facility to which physicians and emergency
department personnel can send the non-emergency uninsured/underinsured patients for
service, thereby lightening the pressure on physician's offices and hospitals.
It will provide a site for educational sessions and one-on-one counseling services to stress
the need for medical care, child development screening, sexually transmitted disease
screening (STD), HIV screening, pregnancy testing, perinatal care and health education.
It will provide individual support and follow-up to determine whether clients keep
appointments, whether they understand the treatment recommended and whether they
return for follow-up.
It will increase the compliance rate of the popuhtion served in following up on referrals.
for medical care, family services, STD screening and treatment.
It will increase the awareness among the conmiles served of the services available at
the center, under either the center's auspices or those of the County.
It will reduce the number of birth defects and developmental disabilities that can result
from women using alcohol, drugs, and tobacco during pregnancy.
It will develop brief health histories and case files on clients referred for service to
measure the effectiveness of the outreach program in fostering utilization of the health
center and the impact of an educational program in promoting positive health choices and
behaviors.
It will result in an increased understanding among the clients served of the health risks
related to poor nutrition, use of tobacco, use of alcohol and drugs.
Request for Financial Support:
ECS will need approximately $124,300 from non-fee sources in order to open and provide the
first twelve months of operation. It is the plan of ECS to establish an operation that in
subsequent years will be nearly self-sufficient in terms of generating fees necessary to support
the operation of the center. However, it is anticipated that some level of help from the
community, private donors and the County of Riverside will be necessary to meet the full range
of needs that will be encountered. Unforumately, ECS is not in a position to initiate operation
of the center until it has operating capital with which to work.
The partners in this vemure are seeking help from the community in raising the initial funds to
open the clinic. Up to $50,000 will be contributed by Sharp HealthCare .Murrieta. Space will
be provided at no cost by the County Department of Health.
HEALTHCARE
M U R R I E T A
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
June 23, 1993
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Proposed Community Clinic Committee
Jerrold M. Novotney, Sharp Vice President
Education and Community Ouu'each
Reminder of the next meetin~
Enclosed please fred a brief summary of the topics covered at our June 1 lth meeting.
Please note that the next,meeting will be at the Clinic in the County building in Temecula
at 4:00 P.M. on Jtme/28th. Based upon further discussion with various parries, I have reason
to believe that given continued enthusiasm, we have the pieces necessary to make the clinic a
reality. Jean Serafy and I will be meeting before the 281h to try to draft a proposal that can be
submitted to the 'two cities. Bob Buster's office has indicated the possiblity of matching funds
based upon our proposal. Since I will be away for the month of July and the fact that we are
on a rather short time line I would like to move the proposal along as rapidly as possible, and
will be looking to you for correction/expansion of Jean's and my initial draft at the 281h
meeting. Since this matter is of some import to our communities, I sincerely hope that we will -
have full attendance at the meeting.
SHMIUMN9B\Be~er.M~no
(909~ 696-6000 ~500 Medical Center Drive Murrieu. CA 92562-99~'2
COMMUNITY CLINIC (PROPOSED)
Meeting Date:
Attending:
June 11, 1993
[Addresses & Telephone Numbers on Page 3]
Dave Dixon, City Manager, City of Temecula
Bob Edwards, CEO, Sharp HealthCare Murrieta
Sam Mowad, Adminstrator, Fallbrook Community Clinic
Jerry Novotney, VP, Sharp HealthCare Muftieta
Cindra Rowell, Ass't Public Health Admin, County of Riverside
Jean Serafy, Director, Family Health Centers, Episcopal Cornre. Svs.
Jack Smith, City Manager, City of Murrieta
Margaret Szezepaniak,-Ass' t Public Health Admin. County of Riverside
Louise Wright, Exee Ass't, Sharp HealthCaxe Murrieta
Purpose of the Meeting:
To discuss the feasibility of a joint venture to open a community
clinic to serve the Temeeula/Murrieta area.
Discussion:
County of Riverside:
County Of Riverside built a 5,000 square foot building for a health facility, but
does not have the funding available to operate.
County is paying monthly rental on the empty space. Would be willing to trade
rent for someone running the clinic.
Goal would be to open by the end of the year (1993).
County Council is reponsibility for bidding process. Can go to single source bid
if willing to proceed in this direction.
County of Riverside and Episcopal Community Service willing to draft an
Memorandum of Understanding.
Fallbrook Community Clinic
Open 4 days per week.
Fully staffed by volunteer physicians (retired in many cases); each volunteers one
full day per week.
One paid clinical nurse; one paid physician.
Average 140 new patients per month.
Draw from a wide area - including Temecula & Murrieta.
Page 1
Sl-l]~(l'~Clinic.O01 Jun~ 14, 1993
Sharp HealthCare Murrieta
Space in present facility is already stretched - no room for a clinic.
Sharp HealthCare may have some seed money available.
Will survey the medical staff for their committment.
Clinic would take the burden off the emergency room of the hospital, which is
used as a clinic by Medi-Cal/uninsured patients.
Sharp HealthCare Murrieta is the only medical facility in the area with a Medi-
Cat contract.
Episcopal Community Services
Opemxes 5 community clinics: Fallbrook, Encinitas, Oceanside, Chula Vista, San'
Diego (Downtown)
Interested in managing the operation of this facility, but does not have cash for
start-up.
Estimate start-up of $200,000 needed - will be on a break-even basis after 3
months. (Fallbrook Wok 3 months to break-even). Expenses are $50,000 -
$60,000 per year on a continuing basis.
Already has a Mission Statement, Budget Projection, Brochures, and Business
Plan.
Staffing program would include 2 full time employees. Volunteers include:
clericaYRN/MD/and possibily Clinical Nurse Practitioners.
Estimate being open 2-3 days at first, based on the need in this area
Hires own billing service.
Familiar with payment programs, i.e., MISP (Medically Indigent), EAPC
(F_,xpanded Access), Medi-Cat, MUA (Medically Underserved).
Nominal fee per visit charged to patient.
City of Murricta & CiW of Temecula
Temecula has a fixed bus route to this site at the present time. Murrieta has
Dial-A-Ride program available.
City funds (Temecula) for 93/94 are already applied for.
Both City Managers are willing to write letters to support the program, and to
investigate funding assistance possibilities.
Funding suggestions
·
·
·
·
·
EDC - Dave MacElroy
Irvine Foundation
United Way - Riverside - Ray Humphries
City of Temecula has CDGB funds - city has no enfitlements
City of Temecula - only a small mount of block grant is committed - Old Town.
They receive 60-70 requests per year and fund 4 or 5 programs.
HUD, Federal, etc. funded by 1/2 cent sales tax per year.
Check with Bob Buster for funds that have not been allocated.
NEXT MRETING:
SHl~ll'~Clinic.O01
Monday, June 281h - 4:00 pm- Clinic site
lime 14. 1991
Distribution
Dave Dixon, City Manager
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590-3606
(909) 694-1989
FAX (909) 694-1999
Jack R. Smith, City Manager
City of Murrieta
26442 Beckman Court
Murrieta, CA 92562
(909) 698-1040
FAX (909) 698-4509
Robert M. Edwards, CEO
Sharp HealthCare Murrieta
25500 Medical Center Drive
Murrieta, CA 92562
(909) 696-6101
FAX (909) 698-7!67
Jerrold M. Novotney, VP
Education & Community Outreach
Sharp HealthCare Murriet
25500 Medical Center Drive
Murrieta, CA 92562
(909) 696-6110
FAX (909) 698-7167
Cindra Rowell
Assistant Public Health Administrator
County of Riverside - Health Services Dept
4065. County Circle Drive
Riverside, CA 92503
(909) 358-5121
FAX (909) 358-4529
Margaret Szczepaniak
Assistant Public Health Administrator H
County of Riverside - Health Services Dept
4065 County Circle Drive
Riverside, CA 92503'
(909) 358-5415
FAX (909) 358-4529
M.G. "Sam" Mowad, Administrator
Fallbrook Community Clinic
120 W. Hawthorne St.
Fallbrook, CA 92028
(619) 728-3816
(619) 728-0685
M. Jean Serafy, Director
Family Health Centers
Episcopal Community Services
3776 Fourth Avenue
San Diego, CA 92103
(619) 260-8128
Beeper (619) 2884963
Psgo3
S!lMlXClini~.001 Jan= 14, 1993
It will result in an increased understanding among the clients served of the health risks
related to poor nutrition, use of tobacco, use of alcohol and drags.
Request for Financial Support:
ECS will need approximately $124,300 from non-fee sources in order to open and provide the
first twelve months of operation. It is the plan of ECS to establish an operation that in
subsequent years will be nearly self-sufficient in terms of generating fees necessary to support
the operation of the center. However, it is anticipated that some level of help from the
COmmUnity, private donors and the County of Riverside will be necessary to meet the full range
of needs that will be encountered. Unfortunately, ECS is not in a position to initiate operation
of the center until it has operating capital with which to Work.
The partners in thi.~ venture are seeking help from the community in raising the initial funds to
open the clinic. Up to $50,000 will be contributed by Sharp HealthCare Murrieta. Space will
be provided at no cost by the County Department of Health.
~--
HMlX.lMN93XF, piscopsl.001 l~e 4
DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL:
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Anthony Elmo, Chief Building Official-'E'~
September 28, 1993
Building and Safety August, 1993, Activity Report
RECOMMENDATION:
Receive and file.
DISCUSSION:
The following is a summary of activity for August, 1993:
Building Permits Issued ...................................... 159
Building Valuation .................................. ~. ,~7,288,122
Revenue Collected ..................................... $92,859
Housing Starts ............................................. 59
New Commercial Starts .......................... 2 = 35, 172 Sq. Ft.
Commercial Additions/Alterations .................... 8 = 23, 134 Sq. Ft.
Building Inspections ...................................... 1,945
V:%WI~AGENDA.REI~Aug'93.Rpt
Agenda Report
September 28, 1993
Page 2
Code Enforcement Actions ................................... 345
Active Cases Pending ....................................... 112
Closed Cases .............................................. 39
V:%WP%AGENDA.REP%Aug'93.Rpt
Z
Z
0
Z1.0
sss§
I ....
I"'
0 f'/)
'T'
f~ I--
i.¢: Z
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER ~r~,
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning ~'
September 28, 1993
Monthly Report
RECOMMENDATION:
Receive and File
Discussion:
The following is a summary of the Planning Department's
caseload and project activity for the month of August 1993:
Caseload Activity:
The department received 7 applications for administrative cases and 5 public hearing
cases for the month of August. The following is a breakdown of case type for public
hearing items:
Conditional Use Permit
Development Agreement
Extension of Time: Subdivision
Minor Public Use Permit
Variance w/Concur Permit
Ongoing Projects:
General Plan: To date, the Council has reached a consensus on all the elements
but housing. That element, as well as, the Environmental Impact Report and
Mitigation Monitoring Program will be discussed at the September 21st City
Council meeting.
Old Town Soecific Plan: Staff is working with the Old Town Merchants Town
Association to set up a Main Street organization for Old Town. The Plan will
be scheduled for City Council review upon completion of the General Plan.
Develooment Code: A draft code is being reviewed by the Development Code
Advisory Committee. The committee has met twice and will meet again on
September 30th.
R:~S~MONTHLY.RPT~1993%AUG.93 9113t93 vow 1
French Valley Airport: The County has received a grant from the Federal
Aviation Administration, to prepare the Airport Facility Master Plan for French
Valley Airport. The comprehensive Land Use Plan and Master Plan will be
developed concurrently. The City has provided comments to the consultant on
Phase I of the Draft Master Plan.
Temecula Reoional Center SPeCifiC Plan and Environmental Impact RepOrt: This
Specific Plan was presented at a Planning Commission Workshop on May 4,
1992. The Commissioners gave direction to the applicant and staff. This
Specific Plan went to a DRC meeting January 5, 1993. Staff is awaiting
submittal of additional information. Environmental Impact Report 340 prepared
for the Temecula Regional Center was approved by the Planning Commission
on June 21, 1993 and certified by the City Council on July 13, 1993.
Winchester Hills and CamDos Verdes Specific Plans and Environmental Imoact
Reports: These Specific Plans were discussed at a Planning Commission
Workshop on May 4, 1992. The Commissioners gave direction to the applicant
and staff. The Notice of Completion for the Campos Verdes EIR went to State
Clearinghouse July 10, 1992. Both of these Specific Plans went to the DRC
meetings on January 5, 1993. Staff is awaiting submittal of additional
information.
Murdv Ranch Soecific Plan and Environmental Imoact Report: This Specific
Plan was presented to the Planning Commission at a Workshop on April 6,
1992. The Commission provided Staff and the applicant direction relative to
design issues. The applicant has incorporated these changes into the Specific
Plan. This Specific Plan will be scheduled for a Planning Commission meeting
upon completion of the Development Agreement and the Congestion
Management Plan.
Johnson Ranch Soecific Plan: Staff has met with the applicant and a revised
Specific Plan will be submitted. At their June 7, 1993 meeting, the Planning
Commission recommended appointing two Commissioners to sit on a sub-
committee to assist in the development of the Specific Plan. Those two
Commissioners have subsequently met and provided direction to the applicant.
Attachment:
1. Count & Valuation Summary by Type - page 3
2. Revenue and Status Report - page 4
R:~S~IONTHLY.RPT~lgg3UMJG.93 9113/93 yew 2
ATTACHMENT N0.1
COUNT AND VALUATION SUMMARY BY TYPE
JULY 1993
R:%S%MONTHLY.FFI'~1993~4M3Go93 8/14,93 vgw 3
REPT155 CCXJNT & VALUATION SUNNARY BY TYPE PAGE 1
09/13/93 11:08 SubtotaL: Cnstr Type
Date Range 1 08/01/93 Thru 08/31/93 AUGUST 1993 Date Type: 1
~ CSeLect ):PLAN
A/P/D Type
A PLANNING CASE
Construction type Count Sq Feet Vatuation Fees Paid
--CONDITIONAL USE PERNIT
---DEVELOPtENT AGREEIENT
--EXTENSION OF TIHE-GUBD[V
PHASING NAP-LND DIV UNT
LOT LINE ADJUSTlENT
--NINOR PUBLIC USE PERNIT
PLOT PLAN ADNZNISTRATIVE
SETBACK ADJUSTENT
SUBSTAN CONFGRN-GENERAL
~VAR]ANCE U/CONCUR PERHIT
1 0 .00 6,588.75
1 0 .00 .00
1 0 .00 671.00
1 0 .00 453.00
2 0 .00 1,920.00
I 0 ,00 945.00
2 0 .00 380.00
1 0 .00 270.00
1 0 .00 370.00
1 0 ,00 1,067.00
12 0 ,00 12,(~4.75 *
TOTAL ** 12
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
REVENUE STATUS REPORT
R:%S%MONTHLY.RPT~1993~s, UG.93 9113/93 vgw 4
REVPRIN2
161
ACCOUNT #
4101
A102
~103
~104
A105
4106
A107
~108
~109
Al10
~111
Al12
~113
~11~
4115
4116
4117
4118
4120
4121
~,_~
4125
4126
4127
4128
4129
4130
4151
41~2
4133
4135
4136
4137
4138
4140
4141
4142
414~
4144
4145
15:40:45
GENERAL FUND
PLANNING
DESCRIPTION
AHEI)ED FINAL HAP
APPEALS
CERT. OF LAND DIV. COMPLIANCE
EXTENSION OF TIME
SINGLE FAMILY TRACTS
HULTI-FANILY TRACTS
PARCEL NAPS
LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT
MINOR CHANGE
PARCEL MERGER (2-4 LOTS)
RECORDABLE SUGDIVISION NAPS
REVERSION TO ACREAGE (5+LOTS)
SPECIAL SERVICE LETTER
SECOND UNIT PERHITS
CHANGE OF ZONE
CONDITIONAL USE PERHIT
CONSISTENCY CHECKS
GENERAL PLAN ANENDHENT
PLOT PLAN
PUBLIC USE PERHIT
REVISED PERHIT
SETBACK ADJUSTMENT
SPECIFIC PLAN
SUBSTANTIAL CONFONNANCE
TEHORARY OUTDOOR EVENT
TEHPORARY USE PERMIT
VARIANCE
ZONING INFORMATION LETTER
CEQA (INITIAL $TUD/ES)
CEQA ENVIROHENT/HPACT REPORT
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
GEOLOGY CEQA
GEOLOGY ORD, 547 APZ
LAFCO
PARCEL HAP/VA]VER
HERGER
AMENDED FINAL TRACT/PAR. NAP
CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION
CONDO TRACT NAP
REVERS[OR TO ACREAGE
LOT REVISION AFTER CHECK
LOT LINE ADJUST. PLAN CHECK
CERT, OF CORRECT, PLAN CHECK
CERT. OF COMPLIANCE PLAN CHECK
COND, CERT, OF COHPL, PLN, CK,
CERT, OF PAR, MERGER PLAN CK
CiTY OF TENECULA
REVENUE STATUS REPORT
AUGUST 1993
ADJUSTED
ESTIMATE
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
,00
,00
150,000.00
,00
,00
,00
,00
,00
.00
,00
.00
.00
,00
.00
.00
,00
.00
,00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
,00
.00
.00
.00
,00
,00
,00
NJGtJST
REVENUE
.00
650.00
.00
131.00
.00
'.IX)
.00
460.00
.00
.OG
.00
.00
.00
.00
.OG
4,405.00
.00
,00
352.00
,00
,00
25o.oo
.OG
1,2~8.00
.00
,00
571.00
.OO
667.20
.00
.00
.OO
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.O0
.00
.00
19~-96
REVEINE
PA6E 1
BALANCE Z COL
.00 .00
650.00 650.O0-
.IX) .00
2,225.00 2,225.00-
18,666.00 18,666.00-
.IX) .00
1,205.00 1,205.00- ***
1,580.00 1,580.00- ***
.00 .OG
.00 .00
.00 .00
.00 .00
.00 .00
.00 .00
2,7&6.00 Z,TA6.00- ***
8,Z15.00 8,215.00- ***
.IX) .00
.00 .00
2,629.00 1/,7,371.00 1.8
.00
273.00 273.00- ,w,,
500.00 500.00-
.00 .00
1,Z68.00 1,268.00-
.00 .00
.00 .00
571.00 571.00- ***
18.00 18.00-
3,90~.00 3,90&.00- ***
.00 .00
.00 .OG
.00 .00
.00 .00
.00 .00
.00 .00
.00 .00
.00 .00
.00 .00
.00 .00
.00 .00
.OG .00
.00 .00
.00 .00
.00 .IX)
.00 .00
.00 .00
,/~..-
REVPR Z N2
09/08/9)
001
161
ACCOUNT #
4150
4151
4152
4153
4155
4156
4157
6169
6170
6175
6180
6200
6260
4369
6370
15:60:65
GENERAL FUND
PLANNING
DESCRIPTIQN
VACATIONS PLAN CK
DOCUI4ENT PROCESSING
CONDENNATION PLAN CHECK
REVERSION TO ACRE. PLAN CHECK
PARCEL NAP PLAN CHECK
TRACT HAP PLAN CHECK
AllENDED NAP PLAN CHECK
6TH & SUBS. SUBHITTALS
FEHA STUDY REVIEW
LOHA REVIEW
DRAINACE STUDY REVIEV
!I4PROVE INSPECTION ON-SITE
K-RAT STUDY FEES
FAST TRACK PLANNING
FORHA FAST TRACK
IN HOUSE PLAN CHECKS
TEI4PORARY USE PERHIT
ACCESSORY WIND ENERGY
LARGE FARILY DAY CARE
HAZARDOUS I~ASTE FACILITY
LAND DIV UNIT NAP
LANDSCAPE PLAN CHECK
PLANN I NG
CITY OF TEHECULA
REVENUE STATUS REPORT
AUGUST 1FFJ
ADJUSTED
ESTINATE
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
150,000.00
AUGUST
REVENUE
.00
.OO
.00
.O0
.00
.OO
.0O
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.OO
.00
560.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
12,356.20
1993-9&
REVElitS
.00
18i'.00-
2,855.00-
101,938.00
PAGE 2
XCOL
APPROVAl
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
'~Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
September 28, 1993
Public Works Monthly Activity Report
RECOMMENDATION:
Attached for City Council's review end filing is the Department of Public Works' Monthly
Activity Reports for August, 1993.
pwOb'~gdmt%e3%O928~aot~pt
TRAFFIC DIVISION
Monthly Activity Report
September 1993
Submitted b/~T~im D. Serlet
Prepared by: Marty Lauber
I. TRAFFIC REnUESTS
TRAFFIC REQUESTS: July Aug
Received 8 16
Completed 12 12
Under Investigation 1 2
Scheduled for Traffic Commission 0 O
II.
ON GOING PROJECTS:
A. Draft taxi-cab ordinance submitted to staff end Public Traffic Safety Commission for
review and comment.
B. Traffic signals.
1. Margarita Road/Avenida Barca - design 95% completed
2. Nicolas Road/Winchester Road - design 95 % completed
3. S.R. 79(s)/Margarita Road - base date research completed
Safe Route to School Committee - Initiate High School safety investigation.
Investigate all options for Emergency Pre-emption System (Opticom).
Inventory of existing sidewalks underway.
Riverside Transit Agency
1. Investigate route changes such as providing a stop adjacent to the new Senior
Center and northern connection to Riverside System.
G. Traffic signal turn on for Ynez Road at Town Center/Tower Plaza, north.
H. Refine signal timing along Ynez Road Corridor.
C.
D.
E.
F.
pwl 5%tnoeotrpt~Traffio~muguetju 091693
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Monthly Activity Report
September, 1993
Submitted by: Tim D. Serlet
Prepared by: Don Spagnolo
WORK IN PROCESS:
Ynez Road:
The Contractor has recently completed construction of the center section of the roadway, including
the medians and paving. Traffic has been redirected to the center four lanes so that the Contractor
can repair any damages to the outside lanes and to provide room to repair adjacent irrigation
systems and re-grade behind the new sidewalks. All traffic lanes will be open adjacent to the
shopping centers upon completion of the above work. The contractor will be working on relocating
the traffic signals at Solana Way and Motor Car Parkway and grading the widened portion north
of Solana Way.
CRC:
lork is continuing on the outside of the building especially in the parking area, where the
Contractor has completed the curbing and most of the paving. The majority of the decorative
concrete has been placed in the pool area and the amphitheater. The outside of the multi-purpose
room will be stuccoed in the coming weeks with the color coat to follow. Inside the building most
of the dry wall has been completed except for the teen room and locker facilities.
Riverton Park:
A pre-construction meeting was held on September 16, 1993, with the contractor Cunningham-
Davis, to address procedures during construction. The Contractor is scheduled to start the project
by grading the site on September 27, 1993.
Jefferson Avenue Storm Drain:
A contract has been awarded to Accurate Construction, who will be submitting their executed
contract to the City. A pre-construction meeting will be scheduled after all contract documents
have been received.
Rancho Vista Sidewalks:
A contract has been awarded to Gosney Construction who will be submitting their executed
/"9ntract to the City. A pre-construction meeting will be scheduled after all contract documents
,ave been received.
pwlS%moectrpt%P, ip%eeetember 091793 .
Pujol Street Improvements:
Bids were opened for the project on September 9, 1993.
to the apparent low bidder will be considered on September 28, 1993.
Senior Center:
Completed
Margarita/La Serena Traffic Signals:
Completed
PROJECTS OUT TO BID:
Pala Communiw Park:
Bids for this project will be opened on September 30, 1993.
PROJECTS UNDER DESIGN:
SI)orts Park Slooe Repair:
Final design plans have been submitted for review by the City.
A recommendation to award 8 contrr-'-.
pw15%mo~trpt%Qip%september 091793
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
MEMORANDUM
Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
Bred Buron, Maintenance Superintendent
September 15, 1993
Monthly Activity Report - August 1993
The following activities were performed by Public Works Department, Street Maintenance Division
in-house personnel for the month of August, 1993:
I. SIGNS
A. Total signs replaced 36
B. Total signs installed 27
C. Total signs repaired 17
I1. TREES
A. Total trees trimmed for 32
sight distance end street
sweeping concerns
III. POTHOLES
A. Total square feet of 50
potholes repaired
IV. CATCH BASINS
A. Total catch basins 4
cleaned
V. RIGHT-OF-WAY WEED ABATEMENT
A. Total square footage for 41,400
right-of-way abatement
Also, City Maintenance staff responded to 32 service order requests ranging from weed abatement,
tree trimming, sign repair, A.C. failures, litter removal, and catch basin cleanings.
This is compared to 26 service order request of the month July, 1993.
The Maintenance Crew has also put in 73 hours of overtime which includes standby time, P.M.
surveillance (weekends only), and response to street emergencies.
pwO~reade~mpt~93%08 0914
MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT - AUGUST, 1993
Page 2
ORANGE COUNTY STRIPING AND STENCILING COMPANY has comoleted the following:
, 3,435 L.F. of new and repainted striping
· 1,000 L.F. of sand blasting
· 125 L.F. of red curb
· 10 new and repainted legends
The total cost for Orange County striping service was $1,906.80 compared to $1,209.55 for July,
1993.
LARUE PAINTING (Graffiti Removal Contractor) has completed the followinn:
· 29 Locations for removals compared to 92 locations for July, 1993
· 3,750 S.F. of removals compared to 22,050 S.F. for July, 1993
The total cost for graffiti removal service was $1,31 2.50 compared to $4,497.50 for the month
July, 1993.
The total cost for Street Maintenance performed by Contractors for the month of August, 1993 was
$9,812.50 compared to $21,858.99 for the month of July, 1993.
cc: Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects
Raymond A. Casey, Principal Engineer - Land Development
Marry C. La~aber, Traffic Engineer
pwO~readfa~pt%93%08 0914
MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT - AUGUST, 1993
Page 3
STREET MAINTENANCE CONTRACTORS
The following contractors have performed the following project for the month of July.
MONTELEONE EXCAVATING
Account No. 5402
Date: August 24, 1993
Margarita Road north and south of Solana Way
Shoulder graded 2250'
Account No. 5402
Date: August 27, 1993
Riverton Road @ Calle Gristrol
Grade and remove spoils, paved 28' x 10' V ditch for nuisance water
Total A.C. 6.5 Tons
Account No. 5402
Date: August 17, 1993
Rancho California Road @ Riesling Court
Remove & replace 238 S.F. of A.C. street failure
Total A.C. 5.5 Tons
NELSON PAVING & SEALING
Account No. 5401
Date: August 18, 1993
Ridge Park Drive w/o Moraga
Rancho California Road w/o Ridge Oak Drive
Clean, remove debris and re-establish drainage
TOTAL COST: $2,950.00
TOTAL COST: ~1,930.00
TOTAL COST: ~2,200.00
TOTAL S.F. = 572
TOTAL A.C. -- 13.5 Tons
TOTAL COST: ~1,700.00
pwOE%roede%eotrpt%93%O8 0914
MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT - AUGUST, 1993
Page 4
RANCHO PAVING
Account No. 5402
Date: August 12, 1993
46000 Classic Way
Removed & replaced 16' S.F. Street Failure
TOTAL A.C. -- 5 Tons
TOTAL COST: $250.00
Account No. 5402
Date: August 5, 1993
Rancho California Road 100' west of Ridge Park Drive
Weed abated 3,910 S.F. of R.O.W. weeds
Account No. 5402
Date: August 13, 1993
Elinda Road
Removed and replaced 38.5 S.F. of A.C. street failure
TOTAL COST:
TOTAL COST:
$400.00
$382.50
TOTAL COST ACCT #5401 $1,700.00
TOTAL COST ACCT #5402 $ 8,112.50
The total cost for maintenance for August is $9,812.50.
pwOb'%roede~aotq~t%93%08 0914
J DATE
08-02-93
08-03-93
08-03-93
08-03-93
08-03-93
08-04-93
08-04-93
08-04-93
,-09-93
08-11-93
08-12-93
08-13-93
08-16-93
08-16-93
08-16-93
08-17-93
08-18-93
08-18-93
08-18-93
08-18-93
08-19-93
08-19-93
,'~-20-93
LOCATION
Rancho Vista @ Mira Loma
Rancho Vista @ Loma Portola
41657 Ave De La Reina
31365 Paseo Goleta
Moontide
29676 Rancho Calf. Rd.
39233 Rising Hill
29976 Ave Cima De Sol
Margarita Rd.
42168 Stonewood Rd.
30879 Buena Ventura
Tournament Ln. @ Bayhill
31246 Comotilo
Mira Loma Dr.
40107 Holden Circle
30025 Cevande
44077 North Gaye
40487 Yardley Cto
1005 Zapata (Riverside)
3320 Hwy. 79
31222 Comotilo Ct.
Rancho Calif. & Calle Aragon
43930 Flores Drive
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
WORK COMPLETED
AUGUST 1993
SERVICE ORDER REQUEST LOG
IREQUEST
Trees blocking signals
Trash in R.O.W.
Painting of curb
Sweeper concern
Manhole sinking
Water Valve cover missing
St. name sign repair
Refrigerator in R.O.W.
Telephone poles look ugly
Manhole cover loose
Sweeping concern
Repair St. name sign
Pick-up trash bags
Marking on Mira Loma
Blue bin not picked-up
Sweeping concern
C & G R & R Request
Trash pick-up concern
28100 Front St.
Trash pick-up concern
Pick-up trash bags
St. failure
Replace wodden S.N.S.
I WORK COMPLETED
08-02-93
08-03-93
08-05-93
08-05-93
08-06-93
08-05-93
08-05-93
08-04-93
08-09-93
08-11-93
08-12-93
08-13-93
08-16-93
08-16-93
08-16-93
08-17-93
08-18-93
08-18-93
08-18-93
08-18-93
08-19-93
08-19-93
08-19-93
-1- pwO3%roadslwkmnpltd%08. 090793
SERVICE ORDER REQUEST - July, 1993 ~
08-23-93
08-24-93
08-25-93
08-25-93
08-25-93
08-26-93
08-26-93
08-27-93
08-30-93
Front ~ Santiago
31232 Puas Dr.
Rancho Vista e So. Cross
30675 Feather St.
Manzano ~ Santiago
Ynez E/O Santiago
30510 Mira Loma Dr.
Ave. Barca ~ Margarita
Ynez @ Santiago
Potholes
Trash not picked-up
Catch Basin needs cleaning
Glass in street
Culvert clogged
Potholes
Removal of dead tree
Sidewalk repairs needed
Weed in R.O.W.
08-23-93
08-24-93
07-25-93
08-25-93
08-25-93
08-26-93
08-26-93
08-27-93
08-30-93
TOTAL SOR'S 32
-2- pwO3\roedslwkcmpltd%08. 090793
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
WORK COMPLETED
AUGUST 1993
i DATE
08-18-93
08-19-93
I LOCATION
Bayhill & Olympic
Clubhouse & Bayhill
CA TCIV BASIN
WORK COMPLETED
Cleaned and secured 2 basins
Cleaned and secured 2 basins
TOTAL CATCH BASINS CLEANED
4
-1 - pwO3%roads%wkompltd%93~k08.C8 090793
DATE
08-03-93
08-03-93
08-03-93
08-05-93
08-10-93
08-11-93
08-16-93
08-17-93
08-31-93
08-31-93
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
WORK COMPLETED
AUGUST 1993
LOCATION
Front ~i) La Haciendas
5th St. {i) Front
Monte Verde ~i) Via Norte
E. Mira Loma to Santa Suzanne
Calle Medusa
Calle Rio Vista ~i) Calle Argo
Felix Valdez 6th St. & Pujol
Front St S/O 1st
Margarita S/O Rancho Vista
Rancho Vista ~) Santa Suzanne
TREES
WORK COMPLETED
Trimmed I tree
Trimmed 3 trees
Trimmed I tree
Trimmed 4 trees
Trimmed 2 trees
Trimmed 12 trees
Trimmed 5 trees
Trimmed 8 trees
Trimmed 4 trees
Trimmed 2 trees
TOTAL ' 32 trees trimmed
pwO3~roeck~wkcmpltcl~93~8.u'e 090793
I DATE
08-02-93
08-02-93
08-02-93
08-02-93
08-02-93
08-02-93
r"' ;-03-93
08-04-93
08-05-93
08-09-93
08-10-93
08-12-93
08-17-93
08-23-93
08-23-93
08-24-93
08-25-93
08-26-93
08-30-93
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
WORK. COMPLETED
AUGUST 1993
I LOCATION
Montezuma ~ Jefferson
Jefferson to Winchester
Del Rio ~ Las Haciendas
Montezuma to Calls Cortez
Blackdeer Loop ~b Diaz
Diaz ~ Rancho Way
Del Rio ~ Front
Main St. Bridge
E. Mira Loma to Santa Suzanne
Rancho Vista ~ El Greco
Rancho Vista, Mira Loma to Ynez
Front St. @ Del Rio Plaza
Front St. S/O I st
Front St. N/O Del Rio Plaza
Rainbow Cyn Rd. N/O City Limits
Front St. N/O Del Rio Plaza
Rainbow Cyn Rd. S/O City Limits
Rainbow Cyn Rd. S/O City Limits
Kaiser Pkwy & Rancho Calif. Rd.
WEED ABATEMENT
WORK COMPLETED
Abated
Abated
Abated
Abatsd
Abated
Abated
Abated
Abated
Abated
Abated
Abated
Abated
Abated
Abated
Abated
Abated
Abated
Abated
Abated
100 S.F. ROW
2,500 S.F. ROW
1,000 S.F. ROW
1,500 S.F. ROW
2,000 S.F. ROW
600 S.F. ROW
100 S.F. ROW
500 S.F. ROW
4,500 S.F. ROW
1,000 S.F. ROW
3,500 S.F. ROW
300 SoF. ROW
4,300 S.F. ROW
8,000 S.F. ROW
1,000 S.F. ROW
3,500 S.F. ROW
18,000 S.F. ROW
1,000 S.F. ROW
15,000 S.F. ROW
TOTAL $.F. WEED ABATEMENT 41,400
' 1 ' pwO3%ro~ls%wkcmpltd%08 .Wee 0907)3
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
WORK COMPLETED
AUGUST 1993
SIGNS
DATE
08-03-93
08-03-93
08-03-93
08-03-93
08-03-93
08-03-93
08-03-93
08-03-93
08-03-93
08-06-93
08-09-93
08-09-93
08-10-93
08-10-93
08-10-93
08-10-93
08-10-93
08-11-93
08-11-93
08-11-93
08-11-93
LOCATION
6th & Mercedes
Main St. (i~ Front
5th St. to Front
6th @ Pujol
Vincent Moraga {i~ R.C. Rd.
Avertida Del Sol 0 Via Norte
Via Puerta (i La Serene
R.C. Rd. ~ Butterfield
Corte Madere ~i) El Greco
Solana & Margarita
Yard
Bandan Ct. (1) Huron
Ynez ~) Rancho Vista
Santa Cecilia @ Escolacata
Ave Barca ~i) Margarita
Calle Katherine @ Leigh Ln.
Chardonay Hills
Kahwea ~ Calle Medusa
Kahwea ~) Via Norte
Via Norte ~i) Solana
'Via La Vide
WORK COMPLETED
Replaced R-1
Replaced R-1 (Graffiti)
Replaced R-1
Replaced R-1 (Graffiti)
Replaced R-1 (Graffiti)
Replaced R-1 (Graffiti)
Repaired R-1
Replaced R-1 (Graffiti)
Replaced W-53
Replaced R-1 48"
Installed R-26 (Specialty Sign) 2 "N"
Replaced 3 R-1 (Graffiti)
Replaced 2 R-49
Replaced R-1 (Graffiti)
Replaced R-1 (Graf~ti)
Replaced R-1 (Graffiti)
Replaced 5 R-1 (Graffiti)
Installed 2 W-53
Installed 2 W-53
Replaced R-1 (Graffiti)
Replaced R-1 (Graffiti)
pwO3%roeds~wkcmpltd~.g3%OB.egn 090793
July, 1993 (Continued)
08-11-93
08-12-93
08-12-93
08-12-93
08-12-93
08-13-93
08-13-93
08-16-93
08-16-93
08-16-93
08-16-93
08-16-93
08-17-93
."'~-18-93
08-19-93
08-19-93
08-20-93
08-20-93
08-23-93
08-23-93
08-26-93
08-27-93
08-27-93
08-27-93
08-27-93
08-27-93
08-30-93
/""'-30-93
68-30-93
08-31-93
San Luis ~) Somona
Diaz ~i) Winchester
Long Valley {i) Roanoake
Humber ~) Roanoake
Sky Terrace {i) So, Cross
3rd ~]) Front St,
Bay Hill & Tournament
6/0 Front ~i) Main
Front St NIO Main
6th @ Felix Valdez
6th N/O Pujol
Felix Valdez EIO Vincent Moraga
Front St, ~i) Midnight Round-Up
Winchester Creek Development
Moreno {i) Front
Pujol ~b 6th
Corte Encinas
Margarita & Solana
Station #12
Pauba (i) Margarita
Humbel ~i) Rio Grande
Del Rio ~i).Las Haciendas
Medusa ~) Wellington
Riverton ~]) Medusa
Ynez NIO Rancho Vista
Yukon {i) Rancho Calif, Rd,
Margarita S/O Pauba
Cima Del Sol & Margarita
Aranda & Solana
Margarita SIO Rancho Vista
Installed W-53
Replaced R-1 (Graffiti)
Replaced R-1 (Graffiti)
Replaced R-1 (Graffiti)
Installed W-9, W-6 Replaced R-1 (Old)
Repaired R-1
Repaired S.N.S.
Installed R-2 "25" (Old)
Replaced R-2 "25" (Old)
Installed W-5 "RT" & W-6 "15"
Installed W-5 "LT" & W-6 "15"
Replaced 2 "N" Markers (knocked-down)
Installed "Municipal Parking"
Replaced "N" W-53 - R-1 (Graffiti)
Repaired R-18
Repaired R-l's & R-17A
Installed N,H,W, Sign
Repaired R-1
Installed 2 R-11
Replaced R-2 "45" (Knock-down)
Repair S,N,S,
Replaced Type "N" & W-56 (Stolen)
Repaired R-1
Repaired R-1
Replaced W-41 (Knock down)
Replaced 3 Bike Lane Signs
Repaired W-17
Replaced R-1 (Graffiti)
Repaired R-1
Installed 7 R-26D
.I
Signs - July, 1993 (Continued)
08-31-93 Margarita ~) Rancho Vista
Repaired W-41 & 3 R-26D
TOTAL SIGNS REPLACED
TOTAL SIGNS INSTALLED
TOTAL SIGNS REPAIRED
36
27
17
./
COMMUNITY SERVICES
DISTRICT
ITEM
NO.
1
APPROVA T.
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY .MANAGER
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/Board of Directors
FROM: Mary Jane McLarney, Finance Officer
DATE: September 28, 1993
SUBJECT: Combining Balance Sheet as of June 30, 1993 and the Statement of
Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance for the Year Ended
June 30, 1993
RECOMMENDATION: The Board of Directors:
1. Receive and file the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund
Balance for the Year Ended June 30, 1993.
Transfer $37,808 from various recreation operating accounts to Project
Employees' Salaries.
DISCUSSION: The attached financial statements reflect the
activity of the TCSD for the year ended June 30, 1993.
unaudited
Please see the attached financial statements for analytical review of financial activity.
ATTACHMENTS; Attachment "A" Budget Transfers
Combining Balance Sheet as of June 30, 1993
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund
Balance for the Year Ended June 30, 1993
ATTACHMENT "A"
BUDGET TRANSFERS
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
TRANSFER
FROM:
ACCT. No. I
190-183-
809-5300
190-183-
907-5300
190-183-
810-5300
190-183-
819-5300
190-183-
905-5300
190-183-
906-5300
190-183-
909-5300
Description
Summer Daycamp
Coed Softball
Swim Lessons
Teen Club
Men's Softball
Women's Softball
Men's Basketball
TRANSFER
TO:
Amount ACCT. No. Description
$ 15,020 190-183- Project Emp
999-5119 Salaries
5,081
7,106
4,313
3,560
2,575
153
Amount
37,808
?J
0
E
?-
m._
(',,I . ('q
ITEM
NO.
2
APPROVAT.
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
AGENDA REPORT
Community Services Board of Directors
Mary Jane McLarney, Finance Officer
September 28, 1993
Adopt Resolution No. CSD 93~ to Establish a Petty Cash Fund for
Temecula Community Services District
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 93-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ESTABLISHING A "PETTY CASH" FUND
DISCUSSION: The City Council established a petty cash fund in 1990 of
$300 for Temecula Community Services District. Based on the increase in the level
of city activity staff is requesting an increase in the petty cash fund from $300 to
$500. All transactions in the fund require appropriate approvals and are subject to
selection in the course of the annual audit.
RESOLUTION NO. CSD9~..._
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING A "PETTY CASH" FUND
WHEREAS, there are numerous occasions when small purchases must be made
for or on behalf of TCSD; and
WHEREAS, it is appropriate that a petty cash fund be established to provide for
the purchase of these smaller items;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA DOES tlERERY RESOLVE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. There is hereby established a renewable petty cash fund to
be maintained in the office of the Finance Officer.
Section 2.
The mount of the fund shall be $500.00 and;
Section 3. Vouchers, receipts, or other evidence of payment shall be
required before reimbursement shall be made from said petty cash fund, in such form as shall
be required by the Finance Officer.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 281h day of September 1993.
ATTEST:
]. Sat Mu~oz, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
5Xrcsos.csd\08 I
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss
CITY OF ~ULA )
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, HEREBY DO CERTIFY that the
foregoing Resolution No. 93~ was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City
Council of the City of Temecuh on the 28th day of September, 1993, by the following wll call
vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
CO~CILIdEMBERS:
CO~CIL~ERS:
CO~CILIIEMBERS:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
ITEM
NO.
3
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
DAVID F. DIXON, CITY MANAGER
SEPTEMBER 28, 1993
TEMECULA COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER
PREPARED BY:
'~SHAWN D. NELSON, COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors:
Approve naming the amphitheater in the Temecula Community Recreation Center as
the Thomas H. Langley Amphitheater.
DISCUSSION: On September 14; 1993, the Board of Directors approved
the name Temecula Community Recreation Center as the official name for the CRC
with either the amphitheater or the gymnasium to be named after Tom Langley,
President of the CRC Foundation. The Board directed staff to contact the CRC
Foundation to determine whether they would prefer the amphitheater or the
gymnasium to be named after Tom Langley. The Foundation has selected the
amphitheater as their preference.
Therefore, it is recommended to name the amphitheater the Thomas H. Langley
Amphitheater.
FISCAL IMPACT:
NOFIE,
This One's for the Children
President
Thomas H. Langley
First Vice-President
Timmy Daniels
~ecreto~/
Ke.y Donoho
Treasurer
Leigh Engdahl
Direclots
Melody Brunsting
Ruth Chesher
Bob Cmwthers
Geoffrey Gaier
Debbie Gutknecht
Evelyn Harker
Jon Hays
Rocky Hill
John Hunneman
'~'Rober~ Lapidus
tale Machen
Deane Manning
Joann Markham
George Mar~in
5tewar~ Morris
Sal Munoz
Lynne 5onders
Vic 5oroydorion
Janet 5coot
Dan Stephenson
Dave S~ovall
Alice Sullivan
Lauro Turnbow
Steve Turnbow
Dave Wilson
Dear Temecula City Council:
The Community Recreational Center board would
like to express our sincere gratitude for your
decision to give special recognition to Tom
Langley within the new facility. We also
appreciate the opportunity to express our
preference as to where this recognition will
occur.
After consideration, we would like to accept
Councilmember Jeff Stone's suggestion to name the
amphitheater the Thomas H. Langley Amphitheater.
We believe that this particular venue is ideal
because Tom has spent the last four years
speaking before crowds - large and small - on
behalf of the CRC.
Once again, we-would like to thank you for your
commitment and vision in building the CRC. While
this facility will be a showpiece and example of
Temecula excellence, it will also provide our
youth with positive recreational alternatives.
We anxiously look forward to the Grand Opening of
the center and know it would be impossible
without you and the city staff's superior
execution of the project.
Thank you, again, for the opportunity you have
provided us to recognize Tom Langley's efforts.
Sincerely,
The CRC Board of Directors
27475 Ynez Road, Suite 240 · Temecula, CA 92591
ITEM
NO.
4
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
DAVID F. DIXON
SEPTEMBER 28, 1993
RANCHO DEL SOL LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS
PREPARED BY:
RECOMMENDATION:
Bruce A. Hartley, Maintenance Superintendent
That the Board of Directors:
Receive and file report regarding the slope maintenance survey of property owners
along Margarita Road within the Rancho Del Sol and Verano Developments.
DISCUSSION: Community Services Department staff was directed by the
Board of Directors to conduct a survey of the residents of the Verano and Rancho Del
Sol Developments. The property owners were asked to respond as to whether or not
they would agree to be assessed for improving and maintaining the landscaping on the
exterior slopes of their developments along Margarita Road.
In the Verano Development, Tract No. 20987, 26 residents responded to the City's
survey with 25 residents voting against the proposal of the City maintaining the slope
areas. In the Rancho Del Sol Development, Tracts 20153 and 20154, 106 residents
responded with 103 homes against the proposal.
The homeowners of the Rancho Del Sol Development have taken the initiative to form
the Rancho Del Sol Homeowner's Club. It is their intent to be an active organization
by October 1, 1993. The purpose of this "club" is to collect membership fees,
generate newsletters, implement improvements to the neighborhood, and address
landscape maintenance issues with homeowners that fail to take appropriate care of
their property. It is apparent from the response of the survey and the activities of the
homeowners, that the residents plan on addressing the slope maintenance issue
themselves through the establishment of a homeowner's club. Therefore, it is
recommended to allow the residents the opportunity to address this issue.
3b~e~leeVdele~gn
DEPARTMENTAL
REPORT
CITY ATTORNEY
FII~NCE OFFICER
CITY !~NI~GER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
DAVID F. DIXON, CITY MANAGER
SEPTEMBER 28, 1993
DEPARTMENTAL REPORT
PREPARED BY: (~ SHAWN D. NELSON, COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR
Staff has been working with the Temecula Museum Foundation to determine a
permanent location for the Temecula Museum. The Museum Foundation has
requested to construct the museum facility and rehabilitate the church building at Sam
Hicks Monument Park utilizing the $500,000 budgeted in the City's Redevelopment
Agency. In return, the museum will provide access from Moreno Road to the Senior
Center as a part of the project's improvements. Further, the Museum Foundation has
stated that no additional rent monies will be requested from the City if the museum
can be constructed at the park. This item will be considered by the Community
Services Commission on October 11, 1993 and the City Council on November 9,
1993.
The City is currently out for public bid on Pala Community Park. Bid opening is
scheduled for September 30, 1993. Award of bid is scheduled for the Board of
Directors on October 26, 1993.
The Parks and Recreation Master Plan was reviewed and approved by the Community
Services and planning Commissions. The Master Plan will be forwarded for
consideration by the City Council after the General Plan has been adopted.
The Kent Hindergardt Memorial Park located in the Presley Development is currently
on 90 day maintenance and should be dedicated to the City this fall. Also, this park
is being constructed by the developer to meet the Quimby requirements for the
Presley subdivision project.
The construction of Paloma Del Sol Park is near completion. This park will consist of
two lighted ballfields with soccer overlays, restroom/snack bar facility, and parking
improvements. This park is expected to be dedicated to the City in October, 1993.
The dedication ceremony for the Old Town Temecula Senior Center is scheduled for
September 25, 1993. Also, the City will implement a daily Nutrition For Seniors
Program as soon as the facility is opened. This program is totally funded by the
Office on Aging other than the City has to provide a facility for the program. All costs
of staffing, food preparation, and administration will be borne by the Office on Aging.
Phase II of the Community Recreation Center (CRC) Project is moving forward with
the roofs and ceilings for the gymnasium and multi-purpose room completed. Staff
is now working with the CRC Foundation to determine equipment and furniture needs
for the CRC. It is anticipated that the CRC will be completed in December, 1993.
Staff is in the process of selecting a landscape architect and forming a project
committee comprised of skateboarders and Teen Council members to develop a design
for the skateboarding area. This project will be called the Rancho California Sports
Park Improvement Project.
A pre-construction meeting for the construction of Riverton Park was held on
September 16, 1993, with a Notice to Proceed issued for September 27, 1993.
Staff will be meeting with the Temecula Town Association to execute a lease
agreement for the Northwest Sports Complex in the near future.
Staff is also meeting with a local recycling vendor in Temecula to determine the
feasibility of purchasing picnic tables, park benches, trash receptacles, and other
products with recycled materials.
REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY
ITEM
NO.
1
TRANSFER
FROM:
ACCT. No.
165
ATTACHMENT "A"
ADDITIONAL APPROPRIATIONS
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
Description
Fund Balance
TRANSFER
TO:
Amount ACCT. No. Description
$ 3,274 165-199- Other Outside
999-5250 Services
I Amount
$ 3,274
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
RECOMMENDATION:
1.
APPROVAL _~
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
AGENDA REPORT
Executive Director/Redevelopment Agency Members
Mary Jane McLarney, Finance Officer
September 28, 1993
Combining Balance Sheet as of June 30, 1993 and the Statement of
Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance for the Year Ended
June 30, 1993
The Agency Members:
Receive and file the Combining Balance Sheet as of June 30, 1993 and the
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance for the
Year Ended June 30, 1993.
Appropriate $3,274 for Other Outside Services (legal costs relating to the
Rancho West Apartments) in the Low/Moderate Housing Set Aside Fund.
DISCUSSION: The attached financial statements reflect the unaudited
activity of the Redevelopment Agency for the year ended June 30, 1993.
Please see the attached financial statements for analytical review of financial activity.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment "A" Additional Appropriations
Combining Balance Sheet as of June 30, 1993
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund
Balance for the Year Ended June 30, 1993
t- >
E el::::
J