HomeMy WebLinkAbout011194 CC AgendaAGENDA
TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
A REGULAR MEETING
TEMECULA COMMUNITY CENTER - 28816 PUJOL STREET
JANUARY 11, 1994 - 7:00 PM
At approximately 9:45 PM, the City Council will
determine which of the remaining agenda items
can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00
PM and may continue all other items on which
additional time is required until a future meeting.
All meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 PM
EXECUTIVE SESSION: 5:30 PM - Closed Seedon of the City Council pursuant to
Government Code Section 54956.9(a) to discuss pending litigation (New Community
Lutheran Church), Section 94956.9(b) to lscuss potential liegedon and Section
94957.6 regarding labor negotiations.
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. 94-01
Resolution: No. 94-01
CALL TO ORDER:
Mayor Ron Roberts presiding
Invocation
Pastor Kenn Coil, Neighborhood Church of the Nazarene
Flag Salute
Councilmember Birdsall
ROLL CALL:
Birdsell, Mufioz Parks, Stone, Roberrs
PRESENTATIONS/
PROCLAMATIONS
Proclamation - John Affolter Day
Presentation of Gavel to Incoming Mayor
Presentation by Brian Loew, Executive Director of Riverside
County Habitat Conservation Agency - Overview of Long Term
Habitat Conservation Plan for Stevens Kangaroo Rat
PUBLIC FORUM
This is · portion of the City Council meeting unique to the City of Temecula. At the
meeting held on the second Tuesday of each month, the City Council will devote a
period of time (not to exceed 30 minutes) for the purpose of providing the public with
an opportunity to discuss topics of interest with the Council. The members of theCity
Aget~e/011114 I 01/06/84
Council will respond to questions and may give direction to City staff. The Council is
prohibited, by the provisions of the Brown Act, from taking any official action on any
matter which is not on the agenda. If you desire to speak on any matter which is not
listed on the agenda, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with
the City Clerk.
For all other agenda items a 'Request to Speak' form must be filed with the City Clerk
before the Council gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual
speakers.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be
made at this time. A total, not to exceed, ten (10) minutes will be devoted to these
reports.
CONSENTCALENDAR
NOTICF TO THE PUBLIC
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be
enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless
members of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent
Calendar for separate action.
2
Standard Ordinance Adootion Procedure
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions
included in the agende.
Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve the minutes of November 30, 1993;
2.2 Approve the minutes of December 14, 1993.
Aeende/011114 2 01/06N
3
4
5
7
Resolution Aoorovino List of Demands
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1
Adopt e resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 94-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
City Treasurer's Reoort as of October 31.1993
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Receive and file the City Treasurer's report as of October 31, 1993.
City Treasurer's Reoort as of November 30. 1993
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1 Receive and file the City Treasurer's report as of November 30, 1993.
"No Parkino" Zone on Ynez Road from Rancho California Road to Rancho Hiohland
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 94-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF .THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ESTABLISHING 'NO PARKING' ZONE ON YNEZ ROAD FROM RANCHO
CALIFORNIA ROAD TO RANCHO HIGHLAND DRIVE
Soeed Limit on Margarita Road between Solana And Winchester
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 94-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA,
AMENDING SECTION 10.28 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE
REGARDING PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS ON CERTAIN STREETS
AOende/OI11M 31 01/0S/14
8
All Way Stoo. Pauba Road at Meadows Parkway
RECOMMENDATION:
8.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 94-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
ESTABLISHING "STOP SIGNS'
OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
9
10
11
Authorization to Execute Suoolemental Agreement for the Use of 19th Year
Community Develooment Block Grant Funds
RECOMMENDATION:
9.1
Authorize the Mayor to execute the Supplemental Agreement for the
19th Year Community Development Block Grant Funds.
Letter of Suooort for. AB-927 (Strengthen Anti-Pornooraohv Laws)
RECOMMENDATION:
10.1
Direct staff to prepare a letter indicating support for Assembly Bill No.
927 as it will be reintroduced in the 1994 Legislative Session.
Comoletion and Acceotance of Jefferson Avenue Storm Drain Imorovements at
Winchester Road. Project No. PW93-01
RECOMMENDATION:
11.1
Accept the Jefferson Avenue Storm Drain Improvements at Winchester
Road, Project No. PW93-01, as complete and direct the City Clerk to:
File the Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and
accept a one (1) year Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10%
of the contract;
Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after the
filing of the Notice of Completion if no liens have been filed.
Aeenk/O11104 4 01,/06/94
12
Contract Amendment No. 1 for Professional Survevino and Geotechnical Services for
the Ynez Road Widtning Project. PW9~-05. CFD 88-12
RECOMMENDATION:
12.1
Approve Contract Amendment No. I for additional Professional Services
for the Ynez Road Widening Project, PW92-05 for the following
professional services:
Professional Surveying Services by JFD Associates, Inc. in an
amount not to exceed $20,033.50.
Professional Geotechnical Services by Law/Crandall, Inc. in an
amount not to exceed $6,586.00.
13
Contract Chanae Orders No. 36 through No. 40 for Ynez Road Widening Project.
PW92-05. CFD 88-12
RECOMMENDATION:
13.1
Approve Contract Change Orders No. 36 through No. 40 for Ynez Road
Widening Project, PW92-05 for labor and equipment for various items
of work, in the amount of $12,711.68.
14
15
Fifth Amendment to the Joint Powers Aoreement Creatino the Riverside County
Habitat Conservation Agency to Allow Compensation of $100.00 for Board Meetina
Attendance
RECOMMENDATION:
14.1
Approve the attached amendment to Section 3.6 of the Joint Powers
Agreement Creating the Riverside County Habitat Conservation Agency
(the "Agreement") and Authorize the Mayor to sign the amended
Agreement.
Records Destruction Aooroval
RECOMMENDATION:
15.1
Approve scheduled destruction of certain records as provided under the
City of Temacula approved Records Retention policy.
AgeIda/011114 6 01/06/94
16 Pechanga Casino Status Reoort
RECOMMENDATION:
16.1
Receive and file report.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before a public
hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the
approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the
projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or
someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondences
delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing.
17
An Interim Ordinance Adooted by Urgency Measurers Reauiring a Conditional Use
Permit for the Establishment of Nightclubs. Teen Clubs. Dance Halls. Bars and Cocktail
Lounges. Billiard Halls. Massage Parlors and Video Game Arcades
RECOMMENDATION:
17.1
Issue a report describing the steps to address the condition that resulted
in the adoption of the Ordinance;
17.2
Adopt an Ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 94-
AN INTERIM ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
REQUIRING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF
NIGHTCLUBS, TEEN CLUBS, DANCE HALLS, BARS AND COCKTAIL LOUNGES,
BILLlARD HALLS. MASSAGE PARLORS AND VIDEO GAME ARCADES
18
Planning Aoolication No. 93-0179. Amendment No. 1. Second Unit Permit - ADoeal of
Conditions of APPrOVal NO. 31 and 42 (reauirement for the all-weather access to the
second unit)
(Continued from the meeting of 12/14~93)
RECOMMENDATION:
18.1
Direct the Planning Commission to consider amending Section
18.28.A.C.(10) of Ordinance No. 348 pertaining to the type of paving
material required for access to second dwelling units; and
A~mdaV011114 e 01~06~4
18.2 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 94.-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVING THE APPEAL OF PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 93-0179,
AMENDMENT NO. 1, SUBJECT TO THE CONDITION THAT IT COMPLY WITH
SECTION NO. 18.28.A.C.(10) OF ORDINANCE NO. 348 AS AMENDED
PERTAINING TO THE DEFINITION OF ALL-WEATHER ACCESS FOR
EMERGENCY VEHICLES
COUNCIL BUSINESS
19
ADoointment of Planning Commissioner
RECOMMENDATION:
19.1 Review the Ad-Hoc committee recommendations and appoint one
applicant to fill an unexpired term (ending June 4, 1994) on the
Temecula Planning Commission.
20
Ordinance Adooting Temecula Municioal Code
RECOMMENDATION:
20.1
Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 94-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA,
ADOPTING THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE
20.2
Direct the City Clerk to schedule a public hearing to be held on January
25, 1994 which includes consideration of the adoption of the Temecula
Municipal Code end the following secondary codes:
Ae
Ee
Riverside County Ordinances adopted by reference;
Uniform Building Code, 1991 Edition with appendices in
California State Amendments
Uniform Building Codes Standards, 1991 Edition
Uniform Mechanical Code, 1991 Edition, with appendices in
Califomia State Amendments.
Uniform Plumbing Code. 1991 Edition, with appendices in
California State Amendments.
Aeendd011114 7 01~06Jl4
21
Uniform Administrative Code, 1991 Edition.
Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings, 1991
Edition.
Uniform Housing Code. 1991 Edition; and
Uniform Swimming Pools. Soa and Hot Tub Code, 1991 Edition.
Selection of City Council Committee Assianments
RECOMMENDATION:
21.1
Select and appoint members of the City Council to act as Liaison to
various City Commissions and to sews on various ad-hoc sub-
committees for calendar year 1994.
22
Paloma del Sol - Agreement Between KRDC, Inc. and City Reoardina Acceotance of
Park. ADDrOVal Of Final Tract Mao No. 94135-3 and Modification of Target Density for
BRannino Area 6
RECOMMENDATION:
22.1
Approve the Agreement between Kemper Real Estate Development
Company and the City of Temecula regarding Paloma del Sol.
23
Agoroyal of Final Tract Mao No. ~4135.3
RECOMMENDATION:
23.1 Approve Final Vesting Tract Map No. 24135-3 subject to the Conditions
of Approval.
24
25
Status Reoort on Widening of Winchester Road Bridge Widenina and Logo Ramo,
Overland Overcrossina, and Margarita Road Widening North of Rancho California Road
(Placed on the agenda at the request of Councilmember Mufioz)
24.1 Receive and file report.
Discussion of Sister City Proaram
(BRaced on the agenda at the request of Mayor Robarts)
CITY MANAGER REPORT
CITY ATTORNEY REPORT
/~eend~O111N I 01/06/14
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: January 25, 1994, 7:00 PM, Temecula Community Center, 28816
Pujol Street, Temecula, California
Aeelde)011114 ·
TfMF~UI A CnMMUNITY SFRVICFS nltTRICT MFFTINR - fro be held at 8:001
CALL TO ORDER:
ROLL CALL:
PUBLIC COMMENT:
PRESENTATIONS:
CONSENT CALENDAR
President Jeff Stone
DIRECTORS:
Birdsall, Mufioz, Perks, Robarts, Stone,
Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors, should
present a completed pink 'Request to Speak' to the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state
your name and address for the record.
Presentation of Gavel to Incoming President
Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of November 30, 1993;
1.2 Approve the minutes of December 14, 1993.
2
Amendment to the Solicitation of Construction Bids for Soorts Park Slooe Repair
Project (PW93-06)
(Continued from the meeting of 12/14/93)
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1
Approve the construction plans and specifications and authorize the
Department of Public Works to solicit public construction bids for the
Sports Park Slope Repair Project (PW93-06).
3
Contract Amendment - California Landscaoe. Inc.
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Award contract for landscape maintenance services with California
Landscape, Inc. to include the addition of Paloma Del Sol Park.
A~eldl/011114 10 01/06/14
4 Grant Deed for Paloma Del Sol Park - Kemoer Communitv Develooment Comoanv
5
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1
Accept a grant deed from Kemper Community Development Company
for Paloma Del Sol Park, a 9.50 acre sports complex within the Paloma
Del Sol Development, subject to the vacation proceedings of Campanula
Way.
Acceotance of the nuitclaim Deeds for the Parkino Lot adjacent to Kent Hinterqardt
Memorial Park
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1
Accept the quitclaim deeds from the Murdy Foundation and Kemper
Community Development Company for the parking lot adjacent to Kent
Hintergardt Memorial Park.
6
Comoletion and Acceotance of the Riverton Park Imorovements Proiect No. PW93-
04CSD
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1
Direct City Clerk to:
· File the Notice of Completion and release the Performance Bond;
Accept a one (1) year Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10%
of the contract value upon acceptance of the improvements.
Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after
acceptance of the improvements if no liens have been filed to
that date.
6.2
Authorize the Director of Community Services to accept the park site
improvements upon completion of the maintenance period.
Amendment No. 9 to the Professional Services Agreement for a Project Coordinator
Durino Construction of the Community Recreation Center Project No. PW92-029B
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1
Approve Amendment No. 2, extending the Professional Services
Agreement for a Project Coordinator during construction of the
Community Recreation Center, Project No. PW92-29B in an amount not
to exceed &l 0,240.00.
AeendeR)1111a, 11 01/06/94
8
Contract Change Orders No. 10 throuah No. 11. Community Recreation Center - Phase
II. Project No. PW9~-~9B
RECOMMENDATION:
8.1
Approve Contract Change Orders No. 10 through No. 11 for the
Community Recreation Center - Phase II, Project No. PW92-29B, for
labor, material, and equipment in the amount of $34,519.14.
GENERAL MANAGERS REPORT - Dixon
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT - Nelson
BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT:
Next regular meeting: January 25, 1994, 8:00 PM, Temecula
Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California
Aeende/O11194 12 01/06/84
T~M~C~I ~ R~n~V~I OPM~NT A~ENC~ Mff~TIN~
CALL TO ORDER:
ROLL CALL:
PRESENTATIONS:
PUBLIC COMMENT:
AGENCY BUSINESS
I Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1
1.2
Chairperson Ronald J. Parks presiding
AGENCY MEMBERS: Birdsall, Mufioz, Roberrs, Stone, Parks
Presentation of Gavel to Incoming Chairperson
Anyone wishing to address the Agency, should present a
completed pink 'Request to Speak' to the City Clerk. When you
are called to speak, please come forward and state your name
and address for the record.
Approve the minutes of November 30, 1993;
Approve the minutes of December 14, 1993.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
AGENCY MEMBER'S REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT: Next regular meeting: January 25, 1995, 8:00 PM, Temecula
Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California
AeerdNO111N 1,~ 01/0NI4
PRESENTATIONS\
PROCLAMATIONS
The City of Temecula
PROCLAMATION
WIIEREAS, the Temecula Valley has long been served by a fine member of the
agricultural community, and
WHEREAS, he was the founder and first president of the Arabian Horse Association of
Temecula; and
WIIlItEAS, this citizen has served the greater Temecula Valley as a member of the San
Jacinto College Board of Trustees; and
WHEREAS, he has also been an active participant and member of The Friends of
French Valley Airport, dedicated to pwmoting the local airport and the promotion of safe air
traffic and travel within the Temecula Valley; and
WItEREAS, his interest and concern with protecting and preserving good water quality
within the valley has led him to serve on the Advisory Committee of the Rancho California
Water District; and
WHEREAS, he has actively pursued the cause of good government by being a generous
supporter of local, state and national political leaden,
NOW, TItEREFORE, I, I. Sat Mu~oz, on behalf of the City Council of the City of
Temecula, hereby proclaim January 11, 1994 to be
"JOHN AFFOLTER DAY"
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City
of Temecula to be affixed this 30th day of December, 1993.
J. Sat Mu~oz, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Council/City Manager
Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning
January 11, 1994
Long-Term Habitat Conservation Plan for the Stephens' Kangaroo Rat
PREPARED BY:
Craig D. Ruiz, Assistant Planner
BACKGROUND:
In 1990, the City of Temecula became a member of the Riverside County Habitat
Conservation Agency (RCHCA) Joint Powers Authority. The RCHCA is the organization
responsible for implementing the Section l O(a) Permit and the Short-Term Habitat
Conservation Plan (HCP) for the Stephens Kangaroo Rat (SKR). The HCP is administered
through an Agency Agreement with the California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) and
a Section 10(a) Permit from the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS).
DISCUSSION:
The permanent Long-term HCP will replace the RCHCAs existing SKR conservation program
and take provisions of SKR under the Short-Term HCP. The permanent HCP would be valid
for 30 years and would authorize incidental take of SKR on lands within the jurisdictions of
the RCHCA members.
It is important to note that the authorization provided by permanent HCP would only cover
incidental take of SKR. The HCP would not cover any other federally or state listed species,
including but not limited to the coastal California gnatcatcher.
The primary elements of the HCP plan will be:
Establishment of Core Reserve Areas - Approximately 12,500 acres of SKR
habitat is in five SKR core reserves that would be established, managed, and
expanded under the permanent plan. At least 2,500 acres of SKR habitat is to
be added to the core reserve system over time through acquisitions, dedications
and habitat enhancement and restoration.
R:%S~ST~.CC 1/51~4 tie
Habitat Mitigation - One acre of replacement habitat will be acquired and
conserved by the RCHCA for every one acre of occupied SKR habitat taken
under the new permit and agreement. If acres of take exceed acres of
replacement habitat by more than 10 percent, the City's ability to authorize
incidental take of SKR will be suspended until sufficient acreage of replacement
habitat has been acquired.
Mitioation Fee. The $1,950/acre mitigation fee currently collected in the short-
term HCP would be continued to be collected. The fee would be adjusted
annually based on the consumer price index (CPI). When the 2~500 acre
performance standard is met, the habitat replacement and mitigation fee
requirements will be re-evaluated by the RCHCA, USFWS end CDFG.
Incidental Take - If a project involves take of 1 O0 or more acres of SKR habitat,
the City would be required to provide the RCHCA, CDFG and USFWS 30 days
advance notice prior to City action on the project. The advanced notice would
allow the RCHCA, CDFG and USFWS to review and comment on large scale
projects prior to City Action. If a 100 acre project would exceed the 10
percent threshold mentioned above, the City would be unable to authorize the
take until the 10 percent margin is restored.
For General Plan Amendments (GPA) within ½ mile of a Core Reserve Area, 30
day advance notice to the RCHCA, CDFG and USFWS would be required. The
½ mile provision is relevant in that the City's Sphere of Influence is adjacent
to the Lake Skinner Core Reserve Area. The plan does not specify what level
of review would be provided by the RCHCA, CDFG and USFWS concerning
GPAs.
Please review the attached draft HCP and provide staff with your comments and concerns to
include in the City's official response the document.
ATTACHMENT:
Habitat Conservation Plan for the Stephens' Kangaroo Rat in Western Riverside
County, California -Volume I
ITEM
1
ITEM
NO.
2
MINUTES OF A SPECIAL JOINT MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
AND THE MURRIETA CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 30, 1993
A special meeting of the Temecule City Council and the Murrieta City Council was called to
order on Tuesday, November 30, 1993, 6:30 P.M., at the Murrieta City Hall Council
Chambers, 26442 Beckman Court, Murriata, California. City of Murrieta Mayor Jack
vanHaaster presiding.
PRESENT: 4 MURRIETA COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: 1
PRESENT: 4
MURRIETA COUNCILMEMBERS:
TEMECULA COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: I TEMECULA COUNCILMEMBERS:
Also present were Murrieta City Manager Jack Smith, Temecula City Manager David Dixon,
Murrieta City Clerk Kay Vinson and Temecula City Clerk June Greek.
Allen, Smith, Walsh,
vanHaaster
Gilliss
Parks, Roberrs,
Stone, Mui~oz
Birdsall
PUBLIC COMMENT
Jeanne Gillen, 38160 Avenida La Create, Murrieta, said she has always enjoyed the mountain
view from the both the 15 and 215 freeway, however, since the construction of the new
Homebase store in Murrieta, this view has been obstructed. Ms. Giilen asked members from
both City Councils to give the hillside views consideration in future planning.
COUNCIL BUSINFSS
1. Discussion of Santa Maraarita River/San Luis Ray Watershed Manaoement Plan
Murrieta City Manager Jack Smith summarized the staff report.
Murrieta City Mayor vanHaaster opened the public hearing at 7:10 P.M.
Jim Mocalis, 42290 Ivy Street, Murrieta, representing the San Diego Regional Water
Quality Control Board, offered to provide information upon request by both Councils.
Peter Archuleta, 3100 Vista Way, Hemet, representing the Santa MargaritalSan Luis
Ray Watershed Planning Agency, provided a summary of the establishment and
purpose of the Santa Margarita/San Luis Ray Watershed Planning Agency.
JCCMIN11130193 -1 - 12/09/93
JOINT
TEMI:CULAIMURRIETA CITY COUNCIL MINUT;S NOVFMBER 30, 1993
Murrieta Planning Director Stephen Herding reviewed the staff report, outlining
alternatives to avoid duplication of effort and to maximize resources.
Paul Romero, 4600 Crestmore Road, Riverside, representing the County of Riverside
Regional Perk & Open Space District, answered questions regarding the policy
committee for the Santa Margarita River Watershed Management Program.
Temecula Mayor Mufloz asked who participated in the Board meetings and if there
were any concerns expressed by the Board in joining the agency.
Mr. Romero said that at the last meeting the Board addressed the issue and expressed
their support of the Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) participation, but want to continue
with the ongoing activities of the County Task Force.
Murrieta Councilmember Gilliss arrived at 7:30 P.M.
Mayor Pro Tam Robarts asked where the funds for running the agency come from.
Mr. Archuleta explained the funds come from the member agencies. Mr. Archuleta
said at the last meeting the Commission approved an assessment for the members to
fund the scope of work for the watershed plan. He said he feels there needs to be a
coordinated effort in watershed planning, since there is no money for duplicated
efforts. Mr. Archuleta encouraged both Councils to join the JPA.
David Bartlett, 24197 Via Prime Vera, Murrieta, said he feels the Santa Margarita River
Watershed Management Plan is an ad-hoc committee attempting to take property
rights. He said he feels the Councilmembers have a sacred trust to protect the rights
of the property owners.
John Bell, 37527 Vineyard Knoll, Murrieta, concurred with Mr. Bartlett's concerns.
He said the Committee formed by County Supervisor Bob Buster is not represented by
members of the public, land owners or business owners. Mr. Bell submitted a list of
the members to the City Clerk. Mr. Bell said he did not support the City Council
entering into the JPA.
Jeanne Gillen, 38160 Avenida La Cresta, Murrieta, said she has served on the
Committee as a volunteer as well as many other commissions and committees. She
clarified it was Walt Abraham who formed the Santa Margarita Watershed Committee.
Ms. Gillen said she is concerned there has been no recreation element to the plan and
no input from the citizenary.
A letter was received from W.H. Rawlings, Murrieta, encouraging both City Councils
not to give responsibilities regarding watershed planning to a JPA that has no private
interest participation.
Temecula Mayor Muf~oz asked for comments from staff.
JCCIIN11120/93 -2-
12/O9/92
JOINT TEM;CULA/MURRIETA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES NOVEMBER 30, 1993
Temecula Planning Director Gary Thornhill suggested the Councils allow staff members
to work together on a recommendation.
Murrieta Planning Director Steve Herding agreed with Director Thornhill. He said the
purpose of tonights meeting was for staff to receive input from the Council.
Councilmember Allen said there are worthwhile and needed flood control problems that
are endangering Historic Old Town Murrieta. Councilmember Allen said he would
prefer dealing with a formal and legal authority.
Temecula Mayor Mufioz said he participated on the policy committee. He said he
would support continuing to move ahead with the current management program,
inviting the JPA to give input from their experience over the past 20 years.
Temecula Councilmember Parks said he is concerned about creating a new committee
when there is still another committee existing. He said the watershed management
plan and agreement needs to be updated.
Murrieta Councilmember Welsh suggested the watershed groups work with staff from
both cities and make a recommendation regarding the watershed management plan.
It was moved by Temecula Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Stone
to refer this item back to staff from both cities to work together on a recommendation.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 4 TEMECULA COUNCILMEMBERS: Parks, Roberrs,
Stone, Mu~oz
NOES: 0 TEMECULA COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: I TEMECULA COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall
AYES:
5 MURRIETA COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: 0 MURRIETA COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: 0 MURRIETA COUNCILMEMBERS:
Murrieta Mayor vanHaaster declared a recess at 9:00 P.M.
at 9:15 P.M.
Allen, Gilliss, Smith,
Walsh, vanHeaster
None
None
The meeting reconvened
JCCMIN11130193 -3- 12109193
JOINT TEMI:CUI' AIMURRIETA CITY COUNCIL MINUTFS NOV;MBI:R ~0, 199-~
2. Discussion of French Valley Airoort Master Plan
Larry Markham, Chairman of Friends of French Valley Airport, provided an update on
the status of the airport. He said the Friends of the French Valley Airport are working
on ensuring the airport is maximized to its fullest potential while being a good neighbor
to the surrounding environment.
Ron Sullivan, 3rd District Aviation Commissioner, asked the Council and staff of both
cities to support the airport master plan process.
Temecula City Manager David Dixon suggested the City Council have a study session
for staff to brief them on the airport master plan.
CiW Manager Reoorts
None
Ciw Attorney Reoorts
None
City Council Reports
Temecula Mayor Pro Tam Robarts asked for a status report of the joint traffic committee and
the grant application. Staff replied the grant is in process and another joint meeting will be
called.
Adjournment
It was moved by Murrieta Councilmember Walsh, seconded by Murrieta Councilmember Gilliss
to adjourn at 9:40 P.M.
The motion was unanimously carried with Temecula Councilmember Birdsall absent.
The next regular meeting of the Murrieta City Council will be held on Tuesday, December 7,
1993, at the Murrieta City Hall Council Chambers.
The next regular meeting of the Temecula City Council will be held on Tuesday, December 14,
1993, at the Temecula Community Center.
ATTEST:
Mayor J. Sal Muftoz
June S. Greek, City Clerk
JCCMIN11130193
-4- I
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
HELD DECEMBER 14, 1993
A regular meeting of the Temecula City Council was called to order at 7:21 PM in the
Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California. Mayor J. Sal Muftoz
presiding.
PRESENT 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsell, Parks, Robarts,
Stone, Mufloz
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Also present were City Manager David F. Dixon, City Attorney Scott F. Field, and City Clerk
June S. Greek.
EXECUTIVE SFSSION
A meeting of the City of Temecula City Council was called to order at 5:40 PMo It was
moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Stone to adjourn to Executive
Session pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a), Rancho Shopping Center v. City
of Temecula and Pechanga Reservation v. City of Temecula, and 54956.9(b). The motion was
unanimously carried.
The 'meeting was reconvened at 7:18 PM in regular session with all members present.
City Attorney Field announced that in addition to the items listed on the agenda, the City
Council met in Executive Session regarding Government Code Section 54956.9(a), City of
Temecula v. McDowall and 54956.9(c). City Attorney Field reported in a previous closed
session the City Council authorized staff to enter into a settlement regarding a portion of
Loma Linda Park, and the Council authorized a settlement of $10,000 which has been
accepted and the lien has been released.
INVOCATION
The invocation was given by Pastor John Flahiff, Christ's Church Presbyterian.
PLEDGE OF AI LEGlANCE
A Flag Ceremony was conducted by the Temecula Valley High School Junior ROTC, under the
direction of Col. Staven Price, United States Air Force, Rat.
Minutee~,l 2~,14't93 -1 - 01/04/94
City Council Minute Deeember 14. 1993
PRESENTATIONS/
PROCLAMATIONS
Mayor Mufioz read a previously mailed proclamation declaring November 28th through
December 4th as "National Home Care Week".
Mayor Mufioz presented Hydro-Row Filtration Systems, Inc. with a Certificate of Official
welcome. Vice President of Marketing Michael Baird thanked the City Council and accepted
the Certificate.
Councilmember Parks announced the 4th and 5th Grade winners of the bicycle safety poster
contests chosen by judges Mayor Pro Tam Robarts and Councilmember Parks.
Councilmember Jeff Stone assisted as the Tie-breaker judge. The following were awarded
bicycles for first place, safety helmets for second place and $50.00 Bonds for third place:
4th Grade Girls:
3rd Place
2nd Place
1 st Place
Marlsol Gonzales, Temecula Elementary School
Kathrine Pascua, Sparkman Elementary School
Tracy Eckard, Rancho Elementary School
4th Grade Boys:
3rd Place
2nd Place
I st Place
Emmanuel Gonzales, Temecula Elementary School
Makario Ruano, Temecula Elementary School
Ryan Neral, Linfield Elementary School
5th Grade Girls:
3rd Place
2nd Place
I st Place
Jessica Leigh, Rancho Elementary School
Corrie Brown, Nicolas Valley Elementary School
Stacy Valentino, Nicolas Valley Elementary School
5th Grade Boys:
3rd Place
2nd Place
1 st Place
James LeBlanc, Rancho Elementary School
Chris Lynes, Rancho Elementary School
Michael Kendall Redhawk Elementary School
PUBLIC FORUM
None
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Councilmember Birdsall reported she just returned from attending the National League of Cities
Conference in Orlando, Florida and felt it was a very successful conference.
Councilmember Parks reported he attended a SCAG meeting and wanted the Council to be
aware that the draft of the Regional Comprehensive Plan was approved for distribution and
asked staff to make the plan available for Council review and input.
Minutee%12%14%93 -2- 01/04/94
Ciw C~un~il Mir~ee Dx~er 14. 1993
Mayor Muf~oz asked for an update on the street widening project located at Mergerite Road
and Rancho California Road. Director of Public Works Tim Serlet reported that Dennis
Chinaeft, with Kernper, is putting together a street light program with estimates, and this
information should be available as early as next week.
Mayor Mufioz asked the a report be given on the status of the Winchester Bridge widening
and Overland Overpass.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Councilmember Birdsell stated she would abstain on Items 13 and 14 since she was not
present for the first reading of the ordinances.
Mayor Pro Tam Robarts asked that Item 6 be removed from the Consent Calendar.
Councilmember Stone requested that Item No. 8 be removed from the Consent Calendar.
Mayor Mu~oz removed Items 5, 9 and 11 from the Consent Calendar.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Stone to approve
Consent Calendar Items 1-4, 7, 1 O, 12, 13 and 14.
The motion carried by the following vote with Councilmember Birdsell abstaining on
Items 13 and 14:
AYES: 5
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall,
Mu~oz
None
None
Parks, Robarts, Stone,
2
Standard Ordinance Adootion Procedure
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions
included in the agenda.
Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve the minutes of October 26, 1993;
IVlinutes%l 2%14~93 -3- 01/04/94
Ciw Coundl Minutes Deoember 14. 1993
2.2
2.3
Approve the Minutes of November 9, 1993;
Approve the Minutes of November 23, 1993.
3
Resolution Aoorovino Iist of Demands
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-99
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
Combining Balance Sheets as of Seotember 30. 1993 and Statement of Revenues.
Exoenditures and Chanoes in Fund Balance. and the Statement of Revenues. Fxoenses
and Channes in Retained Earninos for the Three Months Ended Seotember 30. 1993
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1
Receive and file the Combining Balance Sheets as of September 30,
1993 and the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in
Fund Balance, and the Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes
in Retained Earnings for the Three Months Ended September 30, 1993;
4.2
Appropriate ;63,810 in Account 001-140-999-5248 "Consulting
Services" to pay a 15% fee for a ;425,397 sales tax recovery.
4.3
Appropriate ;75,000 to Account 001-199-999-5610 "Equipment" for
the purchase of video equipment to be located at the Community
Recreation Center.
Acceot Public Imorovements in Tract No. 22627-F
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1
Accept the Public Improvements in Tract No. 22627-F;
7.2
Authorize the reduction of Faithful Performance Street, and Sewer and
Water System Securities;
7.3
Accept the Faithful Performance Warranty Bond riders;
7.4
Direct the City Clerk to so notify the Developer end surety.
Aeeedd121.413 4 01,R)4/14
City Council Minutes Deoemher 14. 1993
10.
12.
l iefer Road Bridae end Rtreet ImDrovements Reimbursement Agreement With the
Rancho California Water District for the Reconstruction of the 1 ~-Inch Water Main
(PW93-O~)
RECOMMENDATION:
10.1
Approve and authorize the Mayor to sign the reimbursement agreement
with the Rancho California Water District for improvements in the
amount of $20,500 to be constructed by the City's Contractor for the
Liefer Road Bridge and Street Improvements Project (PW93-02).
Senior Center Comoletion Costs
RECOMMENDATION:
12.1
Approve an additional appropriation of funds to apply to Senior Center
Project PW92-03 in the amount of $24,500 to cover unanticipated costs
incurred in completing the project.
SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES
13.
Second Readina of Ordinance 93-19 Reo8rdino Park Facility Use
RECOMMENDATION:
13.1
Adopt an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 93-19
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ADOPTING PARK AND RECREATIONAL · FACILITY POUCIES AND
REGULATIONS ESTABLISHING GENERAL OPERATION POLICIES GOVERNING
SPECIAL USE PARKS, AND REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 91-37
The motion carried by the following vote:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
AYES: 4
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 0
ABSTAIN: I
Parks, Roberts, Stone, Mui~oz
None
None
Birdsall
Aelndl/121493 I 01.4~I,NMI,
Clw Cmandl Minutes Deedx~ 14. 1993
14.
Establishina Soeed Limits on Certain Streets
Second Reading of Ordin. nce 93-~1
RECOMMENDATION:
14.1 Adopt an ordinance entitled;
ORDINANCE NO, 93-21
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA,
AMENDING SECTION 12,02,010 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE
REGARDING PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS ON CBRTAIN STREETS
The motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Parks, Roberts, Stone, Muf~oz
NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSTAIN: I COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall
Travel Policv
Mayor Mufioz stated he noted an inconsistency between the staff report and the actual
policy, on page three, paragraph A, regarding business travel within the state and out
of state.
Finance Officer Mary Jane McLamey stated the policy will be corrected to coincide
with the staff report.
It was moved by Mayor Muftoz, seconded by Councilmember Parks to approve staff
recommendation to receive and file travel policy. The motion was unanimously carried.
Award of Vehicle I~ irchase
Mayor Pro Tem Roberts asked why the bids did not include propane-ready vehicles.
Finance Officer McLamey stated this is how all the bids have been handled in the past
and special State funds are available for conversion costs.
Mayor Pro Tem Roberrs asked why the lowest bidder was not awarded the bid. Ma.
McLarney explained that the propane tank would not fit on the vehicle that was low
bid.
· lemle/121413 8 Ol/O4/ll
Ciw Council Minute DeoMnber 14. 1993
RECESS
Mayor Muf~oz called a recess at 8:19 PM. The meeting was reconvened following the
previously scheduled Community Services District Meeting at 8:53 PM.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
15.
So,rce Reduction and Recycling ;:lement (SRRE) and the Household Hazardo-e Waste
Element (HHWE)
Senior Management Analyst Phyliss Ruse presented the staff report.
Valerie Bonhard, representing the consulting firm of Kleinfelder, presented a brief report
regarding the comprehensive planning document for waste management.
Councilmember Parks asked that the public be re-educated regarding the City's
recycling program.
Mayor Pro Tam Robarts stated he discussed this matter with Phyliss Ruse and
requested that educational information be included in the TCSD newsletter.
Mayor Muftoz opened the public hearing st 9:05 PM.
Hearing no requests to speak, Mayor Muf~oz closed the public hearing at 9:05 PM.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Stone to approve
staff recommendation as follows:
RECOMMENDATION:
15.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-100
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ADOPTING THE FINAL SOURCE REDUCTION AND RECYCLING ELEMENT AND
HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE ELEMENT AS PRESCRIBED BY THE
CALIFORNIA INTEGRATED WASTE MANAGEMENT ACT OF 1989
The motion was unanimously carried.
16.
Soecific Plan No. 164, Amendment No..~ (PA93-0145) and Tentative Tract MaD No.
27827 (PA93-0144). Rorioaugh
Director of Planning Gary Thornhill presented the staff report, reading changes to
Condition No. 59, in the event the developer constructs the median, it shall
accommodate a left turn pocket into Roripaugh Road. (p. 3 of staff report.)
· ~mle/121413 I 01,q)4JI4
City C~ur.:il Min~Te~ December 14. 1993
Mayor Muf~oz opened the public hearing at 9:20 PM.
D. "lan" Wilson, 30225 Sierra Madre Drive, addressed the Council in opposition to the
project as currently proposed, listing the transfer of density and conversion of zoning,
and proposed permanent restrooms on the park site.
Susan Souse, 40123 Cannee Court, opposed the project listing density transfer and
the perk as major areas of concern. She also objected to the "alley" style construction
that is being proposed.
Gary Souse, 40123 Cannee Court, spoke in opposition to the project, specifically due
to the "alley" type construction proposed.
Joe Axton, 30169 Sierra Madre, spoke in opposition to the zone change and stated
he feels this area will revert to mainly rental property.
Ed Mowles, 27595 Dandelion Court, President of Roripaugh Homeowners Association,
voiced his opposition to the project and stated he feels density has been increased
instead of decreased. He stated that proper notification was not given for this public
hearing and this item should be continued until proper notification has been obtained.
RECESS
Mayor Mufioz called a recess at 9:38 PM to change the tape. The meeting was
reconvened at 9:40 PM with all members present.
Sanford Edward, representing the applicant, Roripaugh Ranches, Inc., Box 2, explained
this project is the product of 18 months of work with staff, to design a project that
best met the needs of the community. He stated this new design, called "Neo-
Traditional, has been successful in Irvine, San Diego County and the alleys are
governed by strict CC&Rs. He stated the park, with permanent restroom facilities,
was something the City requested.
Councilmember Stone suggested staff re-notice this project to give all those who wish
to voice an opinion the opportunity to do so.
Mayor Mu~oz closed the public hearing at 10:04 PM.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Mayor Pro Tam Robarts to extend
the meeting 11:00 PM.
It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Robarts, seconded by Councilmember Stone to
continue the public hearing to January 11, 1993.
City Attorney Field suggested the public hearing be re-opened end continued to the
meeting of January 25, 1993 to allow re-noticing of the project.
~ealde/t21413 10 01R)4/14
City C~.andl Minute Deoember 14. 1993
Mayor Pro Tam Robarts amended his motion, Councilmember Stone amended his
second to continue the public hearing to the meeting of January 25, 1994 and directed
staff to re-notice the public hearing and notify all homeowners associations for
neighboring tracts. The motion was unanimously carried.
RECESS
Mayor Muftoz called a recess at 10:25 PM. The meeting was reconvened at 10:30
PM.
Hearing no objections, Mayor Mufioz reordered the agenda to accommodate those wishing to
speak on Item No. 25.
25. Discussion of Sion Ordinance
Director of Planning Gary Thornhill stated staff did not prepare a formal staff report on
this item, but were requesting direction from the Council.
Bruce Sparks, 27464 Commerce Center Drive, owner of Sparks Furniture, thanked
members of the Council for offering small business loans to aid businesses in obtaining
permanent signs, but requested that businesses simply be left alone and asked that
enforcement of the sign ordinance be suspended and the ordinance rewritten to allow
more freedom for business owners.
Minnie Jimenez, 41946 Main Street, owner of Natural Looking Nails, stated without
a banner, her business will not survive and asked that the sign ordinance be re-written.
She presented the City Clerk with signature of business owners in opposition to the
sign ordinance.
Jeanne Kearns, 27625 Jefferson Avenue, Ste 100, presented the City Clerk with
signatures of businesses against the sign ordinance and stated businesses did not
desire loans or further debt, but requested a re-working of the sign ordinance.
Don Gago, 41973 6th Street, addressed the Council in favor of re-writing the sign
ordinance to allow more freedom for business owners.
Councilmember Parks stated the City has a temporary sign ordinance because the
county ordinance did not allow any temporary signs. He stated he wants to be
sensitive to businesses but there need to be conditions governing these temporary
signs, and suggested that periods of time be extended for temporary signs when a
permanent sign is applied for.
Director of Planning Gary Thornhill made the following suggestions.
With respect to temporary signs, the current ordinance requirement is 45 days
with one 30 day extension. If Council desires, this could be modified to allow
interim signs for 6 months, with a possible extension of 6 months.
/4eede/121413. 11 QIR34/14
Ci'tv Council Minutee Deoembef 14, 1993
e
Require business owner to apply for 8 permanent sign prior to permitting a
second extension.
With regard to events, reduce requirement of time between events to 30 days
instead of 60 day period.
4. Allow two temporary signs, back to beck.
Councilmember Parks suggested this be agendized and recommended a lead person be
appointed from the business community to work with staff. Mr. Sparks stated he
would be willing to represent the business community end work with staff.
City Attorney Field advised the Council that since the current sign ordinance is a
zoning ordinance, amendments must go first to the Planning Commission, and
suggested that this matter be referred to the Planning Commission to expedite the
process.
Mayor Muf~oz requested that no citations be issued during this period, but requests for
voluntary compliance continue.
Chief Building Official Tony Elmo asked that the enforcement program be suspended
until this matter is resolved, stating his desire is to protect the credibility of the Code
Enforcement Officer.
Councilmember Birdsall stated she is in favor of reviewing this matter once more, but
three years ago businesses were involved in drafting the current sign ordinance, and
she hopes that this matter will not continue to surface every several years. She asked
the business community to "police themselves" to avoid problems that were present
three years ago before the sign ordinance took effect.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Stone to refer
this matter to the Planning Commission to conduct hearings regarding amendments to
the ordinance and further directed staff to waive enforcement for a period of 90 days.
The motion was unanimously carried.
17.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Stone to continue
the meeting until 12:00 AM. The motion was unanimously carried.
Planning Aoolication No. 93-0179. Amendment No. I - Second unit Permit - Aoneal
of Conditions of Aooroval No. 31 and 4~ (reouirement for the all-weather access to the
second unit- as soecificallv defined bv the Deoartment of Public Works)
Director of Planning Gary Thornhill presented the staff report.
Aeend~121413 12 01/0414
City Counoil IVinUTN December 14. 1~3
Mayor Muf~oz opened the public hearing at 11: 14 PM.
Paul Toomey, 34634 C81imine Road, Yucaipa, stated this is a typical second unit and
it has come as a surprise to the applicants that an all weather road is required and
requested that the interpretation of an all-weather road be reviewed.
Mayor Muftoz closed the public hearing at 11:25 PM.
Councilmember Parks stated he does not have a problem with a dirt road in this area
and stated he feels that a ~20,000 improvement is not necessary.
Mayor Muf~oz stated that if s dirt road is allowed, he feels the City should be held
harmless in case of emergency.
City Attorney Field asked if the Council wanted to amend Condition 42 to change the
definition of "all weather" road.
Director of Planning Gary Thornhill stated (1) he needs direction for future applications
to be consistent with approvals, and (2) if second units will be permitted without all-
weather access, the ordinance needs to be amended.
City Attorney Field suggested reopening the public hearing and continuing this item for
30 days.
Mayor Muf~oz re-opened the public hearing at 11:37 PM.
It was moved by Mayor Pro Tam Robarts, seconded by Councilmember Stone to
continue the public hearing to the meeting of January 11, 1994 and directed staff to
prepare an ordinance amendment to address defining a satisfactory surface material
for access to second dwelling units.
The motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Robarts, Stone, Mu~oz
NOES: I COUNCILMEMBERS: Parks
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Mayor Muf~oz reordered the agenda to hear Item 22 out of order. Mayor Muf~oz announced
that he and Councilmember Stone would abstain due to a potential conflict of interest.
.AgeIda/121413 13 01/04jt4
CAw Courtoil Minute Deeember 14. 1993
22. Reauest for Fee Waiver for Rod Run 1994 - Old Town Merchants Associatioo
Director of Planning Thornhill provided the Council with an estimate of fees that are
requested to he waived, with · total of $8,750.00.
Mike Thesing, 30291 Via Briss, Chairperson of Temecula 94 Rod Run, requested that
fees be waived and requested a donation of ;1 ,500.00 to provide portabletoilets for
the event. He stated that a percentage of profits will be donated to the Schriners
Hospital.
Councilmember Birdsell voiced s concern for profits being donated to a charity located
outside of the City.
RECESS
Mayor Pro Tem Robarts called a brief recess at 11:45 PM to change the tape. The meeting
reconvened at 11:45 PM.
Mayor Pro Tem Roberrs asked the status of the loan to the Old Town Merchants
Association, and stated it was his understanding that any profits from last year were
to be used to repay the loan.
Finance Officer Mary Jane McLarney advised that no repayment has been received by
the City on previous loans to the Old Town Merchants Association.
John Coute, 3083 Pepper, Highland, stated this is a premier event in Southern
California and events are always better received if s charity is involved.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Birdsall to extend
the meeting until 12:30 AM. The motion was unanimously carried.
Councilmember Birdsall suggested giving a ;5,000 sponsorship from the City's
promotional budget, instead of arbitrarily waiving fees which have no set dollar
amount.
It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Parks to
approve an allocation of $5,000 from the Promotional Budget for sponsorship of the
event.
The motion carried by the following vote:
AYES:
3 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsell, Parks, Robarts
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSTAIN: 2 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Mul%oz, Stone
Aeende/121493 . 14 01/iNNS
PRESENTATIONS\
PROCLAMATIONS
The City of Tetnecula
PROCLAMATION
WHEREAS, the Temeeula Valley has long been served by a fine member of the
agricultural community, and
WHEREAS, he was the founder and first president of the Arabian Horse Association of
Temecula; and
WHEREAS, this citizen has served the greater Temecula Valley as a member of the San
Jacinto College Boaxd of Trustees; and
WHEREAS, he has also been an active participant and member of The Friends of
French Valley Airport, dedicated to promoting the local airport and the promotion of safe air
traffic and travel within the Temecula Valley; and
WHEREAS, his interest and concern with protecting and preserving good water quality
within the valley has led him to serve on the Advisory Committee of the Rancho California
Water District; and
WHEREAS, he has actively pursued the cause of good government by being a generous
supporter of local, state and national political leaden,
NOW, THEREFORE, I, J. Sal Mu~oz, on behalf of the City Council of the City of
Temecula, hereby proclaim January 11, 1994 to be
"JOHN AFFOLTER DAY"
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City
of Temecula to be affixed this 30th day of December, 1993.
J. Sal Mu~oz, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
#
SUBJECT:
City Council/City Manager
Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning
January 11, 1994
Long-Term Habitat Conservation Ran for the Stephens' Kangaroo Rat
PREPARED BY:
Craig D. Ruiz, Assistant Planner
BACKGROUND:
In 1990, the City of Temecula became a member of the Riverside County Habitat
Conservation Agency (RCHCA) Joint Powers Authority. The RCHCA is the organization
responsible for implementing the Section l O(a) Permit and the Short-Term Habitat
Conservation Plan (HCP) for the Stephens Kangaroo Rat (SKR). The HCP is administered
through an Agency Agreement with the California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) and
a Section 10(a) Permit from the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS).
DISCUSSION:
The permanent Long-term HCP will replace the RCHCAs existing SKR conservation program
and take provisions of SKR under the Short-Term HCP. The permanent HCP would be valid
for 30 years and would authorize incidental take of SKR on lands within the jurisdictions of
the RCHCA members.
It is important to note that the authorization provided by permanent HCP would only cover
incidental take of SKR. The HCP would not cover any other federally or state listed species,
including but not limited to the coastal California gnatcatcher.
The primary elements of the HCP plan will be:
Establishment of Core Reserve Areas - Approximately 12,500 acres of SKR
habitat is in five SKR core reserves that would be established, managed, and
expanded under the permanent plan. At least 2,500 acres of SKR habitat is to
be added to the core reserve system over time through acquisitions, dedications
and habitat enhancement and restoration.
R:~S%STA~CC 1/~/94 ~i~
Habitat Mitioation - One acre of replacement habitat will be acquired and
conserved by the RCHCA for every one acre of occupied SKR habitat taken
under the new permit and agreement. If acres of take exceed acres of
replacement habitat by more than 10 percent, the City'e ability to authorize
incidental take of SKR will be suspended until sufficient acreage of repl~bcement
habitat has been acquired.
Mitigation Fee. The $1,950/acre mitigation fee currently collected in the short-
term HCP would be continued to be collected. The fee would be adjusted
annually based on the consumer price index (CPI). When the 2~500 acre
performance standard is met, the habitat replacement and mitigation fee
requirements will be re-evaluated by the RCHCA, USFWS and CDFG.
Incidental Take - If a project involves take of 100 or more acres of SKR habitat,
the City would be required to provide the RCHCA, CDFG and USFWS 30 days
advance notice prior to City action on the project. The advanced notice would
allow the RCHCA, CDFG and USFWS to review and comment on large scale
projects prior to City Action. If · 100 acre project would exceed the 10
percent threshold mentioned above, the City would be unable to authorize the
take until the 10 percent margin is restored.
For General Plan Amendments (GPA) within ½ mile of a Core Reserve Area, 30
day advance notice to the RCHCA, CDFG and USFWS would be required. The
½ mile provision is relevant in that the City's Sphere of Influence is adjacent
to the Lake Skinner Core Reserve Area. The plan does not specify what level
of review would be provided by the RCHCA, CDFG end USFWS concerning
GPAs.
Please review the attached draft HCP and provide staff with your comments and cor~cerns to
include in the City's official response the document.
ATTACHMENT:
Habitat Conservation Plan for the Stephens' Kangaroo Rat in Western Riverside
County, California -Volume I
ITEM
1
ITEM
NO.
MINUTES OF A SPECIAL JOINT MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
AND THE MURRIETA CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 30, 1993
A special meeting of the Temecula City Council and the Murrieta City Council was called to
order on Tuesday, November 30, 1993, 6:30 P.M., at the Murrieta City Hall Council
Chambers, 26442 Beckman Court, Murriete, California. City of Murrieta Mayor Jack
vanHaaster presiding.
PRESENT: 4 MURRIETA COUNCILMEMBERS: Allen, Smith, Walsh,
vanHaaster
ABSENT: I MURRIETA COUNCILMEMBERS: Gilliss
PRESENT: 4 TEMECULA COUNCILMEMBERS: Parks, Roberts,
Stone, Mufioz
ABSENT: I TEMECULA COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall
Also present were Murriete City Manager Jack Smith, Temecula City Manager David Dixon,
Murrieta City Clerk Kay Vinson and Temecule City Clerk June Greek.
PUBLIC COMMENT
Jeanne Gillen, 38160 Avenida La Cresta, Murrieta, said she has always enjoyed the mountain
view from the both the 15 and 215 freeway, however, since the construction of the new
Homebase store in Murrieta, this view has been obstructed. Ms. Giilen asked members from
both City Councils to give the hillside views consideration in future planning.
COUNCIL BUSINESS
1. Discussion of Santa Maroarita River/San Luis Rev Watershed Manaoement Plan
Murrieta City Manager Jack Smith summarized the staff report.
Murrieta City Mayor vanHaaster opened the public hearing at 7:10 P.M.
Jim Mocalis, 42290 ivy Street, Murrieta, representing the San Diego Regional Water
Quality Control Board, offered to provide information upon request by both Councils.
Peter Archuleta, 3100 Vista Way, Hemst, representing the Santa Margarita/San Luis
Rey Watershed Planning Agency, provided a summary of the establishment and
purpose of the Santa Margarita/San Luis Rey Watershed Planning Agency.
JCCMIN11130/93 -1 - 12/0~193
JOINT TEMI=CULAIMURRIETA CITY COUNCIL MINUTFS
NOVFMBFR 30, 1993
Murrieta Planning Director Stephen Harding reviewed the staff report, outlining
alternatives to avoid duplication of effort and to maximize resources.
Paul Romero, 4600 Crestmore Road, Riverside, representing the County of Riverside
Regional Park & Open Space District, answered questions regarding the policy
committee for the Santa Margarita River Watershed Management Program.
Temecula Mayor Mufioz asked who participated in the Board meetings and if there
were any concerns expressed by the Board in joining the agency.
Mr. Romero said that at the last meeting the Board addressed the issue and expressed
their support of the Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) participation, but want to continue
with the ongoing activities of the County Task Force.
Murrieta Councilmember Gilliss arrived at 7:30 P.M.
Mayor Pro Tem Robarts asked where the funds for running the agency come from.
Mr. Archuleta explained the funds come from the member agencies. Mr. Archuleta
said at the last meeting the Commission approved an assessment for the members to
fund the scope of work for the watershed plan. He said he feels there needs to be a
coordinated effort in watershed planning, since there is no money for duplicated
efforts. Mr. Archuleta encouraged both Councils to join the JPA.
David Bartlett, 24197 Via Prima Vera, Murrieta, said he feels the Santa Margarita River
Watershed Management Plan is an ad-hoc committee attempting to take property
rights. He said he feels the Councilmembers have a sacred trust to protect the rights
of the property owners.
John Bell, 37527 Vineyard Knoll, Murrieta, concurred with Mr. Bartlett's concerns.
He said the Committee formed by County Supervisor Bob Buster is not represented by
members of the public, land owners or business owners. Mr. Bell submitted a list of
the members to the City Clerk. Mr. Bell said he did not support the City Council
entering into the JPA.
Jeanne Gillen, 38160 Avenida La Cresta, Murrieta, said she has served on the
Committee as a volunteer as well as many other commissions and committees. She
clarified it was Walt Abraham who formed the Santa Margarita Watershed Committee.
Ms. Gillen said she is concerned there has been no recreation element to the plan and
no input from the citizenary.
A letter was received from W.H. Rawlings, Murrieta, encouraging both City Councils
not to give responsibilities regarding watershed planning to a JPA that has no private
interest participation.
Temecula Mayor Mu~ioz asked for comments from staff.
JCCMIN 11130193 - 2-12/09/93
JOINT T;:M;:CULA/MURRIETA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
NOVEMBER 30, 1993
Temecula Planning Director Gary Thornhill suggested the Councils allow staff members
to work together on a recommendation.
Murrieta Planning Director Steve Harding agreed with Director Thornhill. He said the
purpose of tonights meeting was for staff to receive input from the Council.
Councilmember Allen said there are worthwhile and needed flood control problems that
are endangering Historic Old Town Murrieta. Councilmember Allen said he would
prefer dealing with a formal and legal authority.
Temecula Mayor Mu~ioz said he participated on the policy committee. He said he
would support continuing to move ahead with the current management program,
inviting the JPA to give input from their experience over the past 20 years.
Temecula Councilmember Parks said he is concerned about creating a new committee
when there is still another committee existing. He said the watershed management
plan and agreement needs to be updated.
Murrieta Councilmember Walsh suggested the watershed groups work with staff from
both cities and make a recommendation regarding the watershed management plan.
It was moved by Temecula Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Stone
to refer this item back to staff from both cities to work together on a recommendation.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 4 TEMECULA COUNCILMEMBERS: Parks, Roberts,
Stone, Mufioz
NOES: 0 TEMECULA COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: I TEMECULA COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall
AYES: 5
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 0
MURRIETA COUNCILMEMBERS:
MURRIETA COUNCILMEMBERS:
MURRIETA COUNCILMEMBERS:
Allen, Gilliss, Smith,
Walsh, vanHaaster
Norle
None
Murrieta Mayor vanHaaster declared a recess at 9:00 P.M. The meeting reconvened
at 9:15 P.M.
JCCMIN11130/93 -3- 12/09/93
JOINT TEM;CUI '~/MURRIETA CITY COUNCIl MINUTFS NOVI:MBFR 30. 1993
2. Discussion of French Valley Airoort Master Plan
Larry Markham, Chairman of Friends of French Valley Airport, provided an update on
the status of the airport. He said the Friends of the French Valley Airport are Working
on ensuring the airport is maximized to its fulleat potential while being a good neighbor
to the surrounding environment.
Ron Sullivan, 3rd District Aviation Commissioner, asked the Council and staff of both
cities to support the airport master plan process.
Temecula City Manager David Dixon suggested the City Council have a study 'session
for staff to brief them on the airport master plan.
City Manaoer RePorts
None
City Attorney Reoorts
None
City Council Reoorts
Temecula Mayor Pro Tern Roberts asked for a status report of the joint traffic committee and
the grant application. Staff replied the grant is in process and another joint meeting will be
called.
Adjournment
It was moved by Murrieta Councilmember Walsh, seconded by Murrieta Councilmember Gilllea
to adjourn at 9:40 P.M.
The motion was unanimously carried with Temecula Councilmember Birdsall absent.
The next regular meeting of the Murrista City Council will be held on Tuesday, December 7,
1993, at the Murrieta City Hall Council Chambers.
The next regular meeting of the Temecula City Council will be held on Tuesday, December 14,
1993, at the Temecula Community Center.
ATTEST:
Mayor J. Sal Mur~oz
June S. Greek, City Clerk
JCCMIN11130193
-4- 12/09/93
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
HELD DECEMBER 14, 1993
A regular meeting of the Temecula City Council was called to order at 7:21 PM in the
Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California. Mayor J. Sal Mu~oz
presiding.
PRESENT 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Parks, Roberts,
Stone, Mufioz
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Also present were City Manager David F. Dixon, City Attorney Scott F. Field, and City Clerk
June S. Greek.
EXECUTIVE SI=SSION
A meeting of the City of Temecula City Council was called to order at 5:40 PM. It was
moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Counciimember Stone to adjourn to Executive
Session pursuant to Govemment Code SectiOn 54956.9(a), Rancho Shopping Center v. City
of Temecula and Pechanga Reservation v. City of Temecula, and 54956.9(b). The motion was
unanimously carried.
The 'meeting was reconvened at 7:18 PM in regular session with all members present.
City Attorney Field announced that in addition to the items listed on the agenda, the City
Council met in Executive Session regarding Government Code Section 54956.9(a), City of
Temecula v. McDowell and 54956.9(c). City Attorney Field reported in a previous closed
session the City Council authorized staff to enter into a settlement regarding a portion of
Loma Linda Park, and the Council authorized a settlement of $10,000 which has been
accepted and the lien has been released.
INVOCATION
The invocation was given by Pastor John Flahiff, Christ's Church Presbyterian.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
A Flag Ceremony was conducted by the Temecule Valley High School Junior ROTC, under the
direction of Col. Steven Price, United States Air Force, Ret.
Minutes%,12%14%93 -1 - 01/04/94
Ciw Council Minute Deoembqr 14. 1993
PRESENTATIONS/
PROC~ AMATIONS
Mayor Muftoz read · previously mailed proclamation declaring November 28th through
December 4th as "National Home Care Week".
Mayor Mufioz presented Hydro-Flow Filtration Systems, Inc. with a Certificate of Official
welcome. Vice President of Marketing Michael Baird thanked the City Council and accepted
the Certificate.
Councilmember Parks announced the 4th and 5th Grade winners of the bicycle safety poster
contests chosen by judges Mayor Pro Tam Robarts and Councilmember Parks.
Councilmember Jeff Stone assisted as the Tie-breaker judge. The following were awarded
bicycles for first place, safety helmets for second place and $50.00 Bonds for third place:
4th Grade Girls:
3rd Place
2nd Place
I st Place
Marisol Gonzales, Temecula Elementary School
Kathrine Pascua, Sparkman Elementary School
Tracy Eckard, Rancho Elementary School
4th Grade Boys:
3rd Place
2nd Place
I st Place
Emmanuel Gonzales, Temecula Elementary School
Makerio Ruano, Temecula Elementary School
Ryan Nerel, Linfield Elementary School
5th Grade Girls:
3rd Place
2nd Place
I st Race
Jessice Leigh, Rancho Elementary School
Corrie Brown, Nicolas Valley Elementary School
Stacy Valentino, Nicolas Valley Elementary School
5th Grade Boys:
3rd Place
2nd Place
I st Place
James LeBlanc, Rancho Elementary School
Chris Lynes, Rancho Elementary School
Michael Kendall Redhawk Elementary School
PUBLIC FORUM
None
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Councilmember Birdsall reported she just returned from attending the National League of Cities
Conference in Orlando, Florida and felt it was · very successful conference.
Councilmember Parks reported he attended a SCAG meeting and wanted the Council to be
aware that the draft of the Regional Comprehensive Plan was approved for distribution and
asked staff to make the plan available for Council review and input.
Minutee%l 2%14%93 -2- 01/04/14
City Counoil Minme~ Deeember 14. 1993
Mayor Mufioz asked for an ulxlate on the street widening Woject located at Margarita Road
and Rancho California Road. Director of Public Works Tim Serlet reported that Dennis
ChiMeif, with Kemper, is putting together a street light program with estimates, and this
information should be available as eedy as next week.
Mayor Mufioz asked the a report be given on the status of the Winchester Bridge widening
and Overland Overpass.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Councilmember Birdsall stated she would abstain on Items 13 and 14 since she was not
present for the first reading of the ordinances.
Mayor Pro Tern Robarts asked that Item 6 be removed from the Consent Calendar.
Councilmember Stone requested that Item No. 8 be removed from the Consent Calendar.
Mayor Mufioz removed Items 5, 9 and 11 from the Consent Calendar.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Stone to approve
Consent Calendar Items 1-4, 7, 1 O, 12, 13 and 14.
The motion carried by the following vote with Councilmember Birdsell abstaining on
Items 13 and 14:
AYES: 5
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsell,
Mufioz
None
None
Parks, Roberts, Stone,
2
Standard Ordinance Adootion Procedure
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions
included in the agenda.
Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve the minutes of October 26, 1993;
Minutee%l 2~14%93 -3- 01/04/94
CiW Council Minutes De~b~lr 14. 1993
2.2
2.3
Approve the Minutes of November 9, 1993;
Approve the Minutes of November 23, 1993.
3
Resolution Aoorovino list of Demands
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-99
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
Combin,no Balance Sheets as of Sentember 30. 1993 and Statement of Revenues.
Exoenditures and Chanaes in Fund Balance. and the Statement of Revenues. FXoenses
and Channes in Retained Earninas for the Three Months Ended Sentember 30. 1993
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1
Receive and file the Combining Balance Sheets as of September 30,
1993 and the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in
Fund Balance, and the Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes
in Retained Earnings for the Three Months Ended September 30, 1993;
4.2
Appropriate ~63,810 in Account 001-140-999-5248 "Consulting
Services" to pay a 15% fee for a $425,397 sales tax recovery.
4.3
Appropriate $75,000 to Account 001-199-999-5610 "Equipment" for
the purchase of video equipment to be located at the Community
Recreation Center.
Acceot Public Imorovements in Tract No. ~2627-F
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1
Accept the Public Improvements in Tract No. 22627-F;
7.2
Authorize the reduction of Faithful Performance Street, and Sewer and
Water System Securities;
7.3
Accept the Faithful Performance Warranty Bond riders;
7.4
Direct the City Clerk to so notify the Developer and surety.
Alendefl~1413 4 01~4/14
CiTy C~r~il Minutee De~n~-r 14. 1993
10.
12.
liefar Road Rridne and Street Imorovements Reimbursement Anreement With the
Rancho California Water District for the Reconstruction of the 1 ~-Inch Water Main
(PW93-O~)
RECOMMENDATION:
10.1
Approve and authorize the Mayor to sign the reimbursement agreement
with the Rancho California Water District for improvements in the
amount of $20,500 to be constructed by the City's Contractor for the
Liefer Road Bridge and Street Improvements Project (PW93-02).
Senior Center Comoletion Costs
RECOMMENDATION:
12.1
Approve an additional appropriation of funds to apply to Senior Center
Project PW92-03 in the amount of ;24,500 to cover unanticipated costs
incurred in completing the project.
SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES
13.
Second Readino of Ordinance 93-19 Regardino Park Facility Use
RECOMMENDATION:
13.1
Adopt an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 93-19
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ADOPTING PARK AND RECREATIONAL · FACILITY POLICIES AND
REGULATIONS ESTABLISHING GENERAL OPERATION POLICIES GOVERNING
SPECIAL USE PARKS, AND REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 91-37
The motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Parks, Roberts, Stone, Mufioz
NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSTAIN: I COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall
leenda/121413 6 01/04/14
City Coundl Mirlutee Deomd)M' 14. 1993
14.
Second ReKlinq of Ordinance 93-~)1
RECOMMENDATION:
14.1
Fstablishing Seed limits on Certain Streets
Adopt an ordinance emitled;
ORDINANCE NO. 93-21
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA,
AMENDING SECTION 12.02.010 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE
REGARDING PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS ON CERTAIN STREETS
The motion carried by the following vote: :
AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Parks, Roberrs, Stone, Mutioz
NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSTAIN: I COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall
Travel Policy
Mayor Muf~oz stated he noted an inconsistency between the staff report and the actual
policy, on page three, paragraph A, regarding business travel within the state and out
of state.
Finance Officer Mary Jane McLamey stated the policy will be corrected to coincide
with the staff report.
It was moved by Mayor Muftoz, seconded by Councilmember Parks to approve staff
recommendation to receive and file travel policy. The motion was unanimously carried.
Award of Vehicle Purchase
Mayor Pro Tem Robarts asked why the bids did not include propane-ready vehicles.
Finance Officer McLarney stated this is how all the bids have been handled in the past
and special State funds are available for conversion costs.
Mayor Pro Tem Robarts asked why the lowest bidder was not awarded the bid. Ma.
McLarney explained that the propane tank would not fit on the vehicle that was low
bid.
Jieende/121413 e ol/04/14
Ciw Coundl MinuTe~ Deoember 14. 1993
RECESS
Mayor Mu~oz called a recess at 8:19 PM. The meeting was reconvened following the
previously scheduled Community Services District Meeting at 8:53 PM.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
15.
So-rce Reduction and Recvclino Flement (SRRF) and the Household Hazardous Waste
Element IHHWE)
Senior Management Analyst Phyliss Ruse presented the staff report.
Valerie Bonhard, representing the consulting firm of Kleinfelder, presented a brief report
regarding the comprehensive planning document for waste management.
Councilmember Parks asked that the public be re-educated regarding the City's
recycling program.
Mayor Pro Tem Roberts stated he discussed this matter with Phyliss Ruse and
requested that educational information be included in the TCSD newsletter.
Mayor Muftoz opened the public hearing at 9:05 PM.
Hearing no requests to speak, Mayor Mufioz closed the public hearing at 9:05 PM.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Stone to approve
staff recommendation as follows:
RECOMMENDATION:
15.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-100
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ADOPTING THE FINAL SOURCE REDUCTION AND RECYCLING ELEMENT AND
HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE ELEMENT AS PRESCRIBED BY THE
CALIFORNIA INTEGRATED WASTE MANAGEMENT ACT OF 1989
The motion was unanimously carried.
16.
Soecific Plan No. 164. Amendment No..~ (PA93-O145) and Tentative Tract MaD No.
27827 (PA93-O144). Rorioau0h
Director of Planning Gary Thornhill presented the staff report, reading changes to
Condition No. 59, in the event the developer constructs the median, it shall
accommodate a left turn pocket into Roripaugh Road. (p. 3 of staff report.)
/4erie/121413' · 01/04/14
City Council Minute Deoem~r, 14. 1993
Mayor Mufioz opened the public hearing at 9:20 PM.
D. "lan" Wilson, 30225 Sierra Madre Drive, addressed the Council in opposition to the
project as currently proposed, listing the transfer of density and conversion of izoning,
and proposed permanent restrooms on the park site.
Susan Souse, 40123 Cannee Court, opposed the project listing density transfer and
the perk as major areas of concern. She also objected to the "alley" style construction
that is being proposed.
Gary Souse, 40123 Cannee Court, spoke in opposition to the project, specifically due
to the "alley" type construction proposed.
Joe Axton, 30169 Sierra Madre, spoke in opposition to the zone change and stated
he feels this area will revert to mainly rental property.
Ed Mowlea, 27595 Dandelion Court, President of Roripaugh Homeowners Association,
voiced his opposition to the project and stated he feels density has been increased
instead of decreased. He stated that proper notification was not given for this public
hearing and this item should be continued until proper notification has been obtained.
RECESS
Mayor Muf~oz called a recess at 9:38 PM to change the tape. The meeting was
reconvened at 9:40 PM with all members present.
Sanford Edward, representing the applicant, Roripaugh Ranches, Inc., Box 2, explained
this project is the product of 18 months of work with staff, to design a project that
best met the needs of the community. He stated this new design, called "Neo-
Traditional, has been successful in Irvine, San Diego County and the alleys are
governed by strict CC&Rs. He stated the park, with permanent restroom facilities,
was something the City requested.
Councilmember Stone suggested staff re-notice this project to give all those who wish
to voice an opinion the opportunity to do so.
Mayor Mu~oz closed the public hearing at 10:04 PM.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Mayor Pro Tam Robarts to extend
the meeting 11:00 PM.
It was moved by Mayor Pro Tam Robarts, seconded by Councilmember Stone to
continue the public hearing to January 11, 1993.
City Attorney Field suggested the public hearing be re-opened and continued to the
meeting of January 25, 1993 to allow re-noticing of the project.
AeeMef121413 10 01/04/14
City Courtoil Minute~ Deoeftter 14. 1993
Mayor Pro Tam Roberrs amended his motion, Councilmember Stone amended his
second to continue the public hearing to the meeting of January 25, 1994 and directed
staff to re-notice the public hearing and notify all homeowners associations for
neighboring tracts. The motion was unanimously carried.
RECESS
Mayor Mufioz called a recess at 10:25 PM. The meeting was reconvened at 10:30
PM.
Hearing no objections, Mayor Mufioz reordered the agenda to accommodate those wishing to
speak on Item No. 25.
25. Discussion of Sian Ordinance
Director of Planning Gary Thornhill stated staff did not prepare a formal staff report on
this item, but were requesting direction from the Council.
Bruce Sparks, 27464 Commerce Center Drive, owner of Sparks Furniture, thanked
members of the Council for offering small business loans to aid businesses in obtaining
permanent signs, but requested that businesses simply be left alone and asked that
enforcement of the sign ordinance be suspended and the ordinance rewritten to allow
more freedom for business owners.
Minnie Jimenez, 41946 Main Street, owner of Natural Looking Nails, stated without
a banner, her business will not survive and asked that the sign ordinance be re-written.
She presented the City Clerk with signature of business owners in opposition to the
sign ordinance.
Jeanne Kearns, 27625 Jefferson Avenue, Ste 100, presented the City Clerk with
signatures of businesses against the sign ordinance and stated businesses did not
desire loans or further debt, but requested a re-working of the sign ordinance.
Don Gago, 41973 6th Street, addressed the Council in favor of re-writing the sign
ordinance to allow more freedom for business owners.
Councilmember Parks stated the City has a temporary sign ordinance because the
county ordinance did not allow any temporary signs. He stated he wants to be
sensitive to businesses but there need to be conditions governing these temporary
signs, and suggested that periods of time be extended for temporary signs when a
permanent sign is applied for.
Director of Planning Gary Thornhill made the following suggestions.
With respect to temporary signs, the current ordinance requirement is 45 days
with one 30 day extension. If Council desires, this could be modified to allow
interim signs for 6 months, with a possible extension of 6 months.
/~enda/121413. 11 01RN/14
Ciw Coun4:il Minute ~ 14. 1993
Require business owner to apply for a permanent sign prior to permitting a
second extension,
e
With regard to events, reduce requirement of time between events to 30 days
instead of 60 day period.
4. Allow two temporary signs, back to back.
Councilmember Parks suggested this be agendized and recommended a lead person be
appointed from the business community to work with staff. Mr. Sparks stated he
would be willing to represent the business community and work with staff..
City Attorney Field advised the Council that since the current sign ordinance is a
zoning ordinance, amendments must go first to the Planning Commission, and
suggested that this matter be referred to the Planning Commission to expedite the
process.
Mayor Muftoz requested that no citations be issued during this period, but requests for
voluntary compliance continue.
Chief Building Official Tony Elmo asked that the enforcement program be suspended
until this matter is resolved, stating his desire is to protect the credibility of the Code
Enforcement Officer.
Councilmember Birdsall stated she is in favor of reviewing this matter once more, but
three years ago businesses were involved in drafting the current sign ordinance, and
she hopes that this matter will not continue to surface every several years. She asked
the business community to "police themselves" to avoid problems that were present
three years ago before the sign ordinance took effect.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Stone to refer
this matter to the Planning Commission to conduct hearings regarding amendments to
the ordinance and further directed staff to waive enforcement for s period of 90 days.
The motion was unanimously carried.
17.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Stone to continue
the meeting until 12:00 AM. The motion was unanimously carried.
Planning ADolication No. 93-0179. Amendment No. I - Second unit Permit -Aooeal
of Conditions of Aooroval No. 31 and 4~ {reauirement for the all-weather accels to the
second unit- as soecificallv defined by the Department of Public Works)
Director of Planning Gary Thornhill presented the staff report.
Aeendef121493 12 01/04/14
CAtv Coundl Minute December 14. 1993
Mayor Muf~oz opened the public hearing at 11:14 PM.
Paul Toomay, 34634 Calimine Road, Yucaipe, stated this is a typical second unit and
it has come as a surprise to the applicants that an all weather road is required and
requested that the interpretation of an all-weather road be reviewed.
Mayor Mui~oz closed the public hearing at 11:25 PM.
Councilmember Parks stated he does not have a problem with a dirt road in this area
and stated he feels that a $20,000 improvement is not necessary.
Mayor Mur~oz stated that if a dirt road is allowed, he feels the City should be held
harmless in case of emergency.
City Attorney Field asked if the Council wanted to amend Condition 42 to change the
definition of "all weather" road.
Director of Planning Gary Thornhill stated ( 1 ) he needs direction for future applications
tO be consistent with approvals, and (2) if second units will be permitted without all-
Weather access, the ordinance needs to be amended.
;l~aA;tso. rney Field suggested reopening the public hearing and continuing this item for
Mayor Mufioz re-opened the public hearing at 11:37 PM.
It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Robarts, seconded by Councilmember Stone to
Continue the public hearing to the meeting of January 11, 1994 and directed staff to
prepare an ordinance amendment to address defining a satisfactory surface material
for access to second dwelling units.
~he motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: 4
NOES: I
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Robarts, Stone, Mur~oz
Parks
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Mayor Muftoz reordered the agenda to hear Item 22 out of order. Mayor Muf~oz announced
that he and Councilmember Stone would abstain due to a potential conflict of interest.
Agend~/121411 13 01/04/14
City Couf~l Minute Deeember 14, 1913
22. Reauest for Fee Waiver for Rod Run 1994 - Old Town Merchants Associatiqn
Director of Planning Thornhill provided the Council with an estimate of fees 'that are
requested to be waived, with a total of $8,750.00.
Mike Thesing, 30291 Via Brisa, Chairperson of Temecula 94 Rod Run, requested that
fees be waived and requested a donation of 81 ,500.00 to provide portablet0ilets for
the event. He stated that a percentage of profits will be donated to the Schriners
Hospital.
Councilmember Birdsall voiced e concern for profits being donated to a charity located
outside of the City.
RECESS
Mayor Pro Tam Roberrs called a brief recess at 11:45 PM to change the tape. The meeting
reconvened at 11:45 PM,
Mayor Pro Tam Roberrs asked the status of the loan to the Old Town Merchants
Association, and stated it was his understanding that any profits from last year were
to be used to repay the loan.
Finance Officer Mary Jane McLamey advised that no repayment has been received by
the City on previous loans to the Old Town Merchants Association,
John Couta, 3083 Pepper, Highland, stated this is a premier event in Southern
California and events are always better received if a charity is involved.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Birdsall to extend
the meeting until 12:30 AM. The motion was unanimously carried.
Councilmember Birdsall suggested giving · $5,000 sponsorship from the City's
promotional budget, instead of arbitrarily waiving fees which have no set dollar
amount.
It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Parks to
approve an allocation of $5,000 from the Promotional Budget for sponsorship of the
event.
The motion carried by the following vote:
AYES:
3 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Parks, Robarts
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSTAIN: 2 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Mufioz, Stone
,l~eenk/121413 · 14 01)04/14
City Council Minutes December 14. 1993
Chairperson Ron Parks reopened RDA Meeting. City Attorney Field announced that the
public hearings by the City Council and Redevelopment Agency would be heard
currently. Action of the Redevelopment Agency is recorded in the Redevelopment
Agency Minutes.
18.
DiSDOSitiOn and Development Aoreement Between the Redevelooment Aoencv -Citv
of Temecule and the Donna L. Reeves Trust U.T.D. 7-25-93
City Attorney Field presented the joint staff reports. He announced that in addition to
the staff report, discussions were entertained to enter into an option agreement which
would allow Reeves to repurchase the Jefferson Road property at $2 million dollars for
up to 60 days prior to expiration of 12 months. He explained that during a 10 month
period, the City would have the ability to market the site with Reeves having the right
of first refusal.
Mayor Mur~oz opened the public hearing at 12:17 AM.
Mr. Aaron Jacoby, 355 S. Grand Avenue, 31st Floor, Los Angeles, representing the
Reeves Group, stated this additional agreement allows the Reeves group to help the
City find a buyer, He stated this action allows for the expansion of sales capability to
approximately 250-300 cars per month.
Dave Kennedy, applicant, stated the business function will be moved to the Ynez Site,
and the Company goal is to get full operation moved as soon as possible.
Mayor Mur~oz closed the public hearings at 12:25 AM.
It was moved by Councilmember Stone, seconded by Councilmember Parks to approve
staff recommendation as follows:
RECOMMENDATION:
18.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-101
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVING A DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, A PROPERTY
EXCHANGE AGREEMENT AND A LEASE BY AND BETWEEN THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND THE DONNA L.
REEVES TRUST U.T.D. 7-25-90
,~eenel/121413' 16 01/04/14
Ciw Council Minutes Deeember 14. 1993
19.
Use of Redevelooment Bond Proceeds for Construction of City Administrative Offices
and ~oroorate Yard
City Attorney Field presented the joint staff report.
Mayor Mufioz opened the public hearing 12:35 AM.
Pat Keller, P.O. Box 521, Temecula, addressed the Council and Agency in opposition
to the use of Redevelopment Funds for construction of a City Administrative Center.
Steve Taplay, 43939 Margarita Road, spoke in opposition to the use of RDA funds for
construction of a City Hall. He also stated he distributed a letter concerning rent the
City pays for current facility and would like the figures corrected for the record.
City Manager Dixon stated that the lease payment, plus tenant improvements is around
$30,000/month.
Howard Omdahl, 45850 Via Vaquero Road, addressed the Council and Agency stating
the Bank of America location is not the proper location for City Hall, and stated the
Crystal Ridge location, which he represents, would be a much better location for this
facility.
City Manager Dixon explained that what is before the Council and Agency is not
acquisition or acceptance of a site, but merely financing in the event that this site is
chosen for construction of a facility.
Mayor Mur~oz closed the public hearing at 12:50 AM.
Chairman Parks closed the RDA public hearing at 12:50 AM.
It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Mayor Pro Tam Robarts to
approve staff recommendation with direction to amend Section 2 of the resolution to
approve a contribution of $4,000,000.00.
19.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-102
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVING THE EXPENDITURE OF TAX INCREMENT FUNDS BY THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF CITY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES AND A CORPORATION
YARD NORTH OF WINCHESTER ROAD AND WEST OF DIAZ ROAD
The motion was unanimously carried.
Aeendl/121413 1l 01R)4/14
City Courtoil Minute Deoember 14. 1993
It was moved by Councilmember Stone, seconded by Councilmember Parks to extend the
meeting until 1:20 AM. The motion was unanimously carried.
COUNCIL BUSINESS
20. Flection of Mayor
21. Election of Mayor Pro Temoore
23.
It was moved by Mayor Mu~ioz, seconded by Councilmember Parks to elect
Councilmember Ron Roberrs to serve as Mayor to preside until the end of calendar year
1994, and Councilmember Jeff Stone to serve as Mayor Pro Tempore who will assume
the duties of the Mayor in the Mayor's absence until the end of calendar year 1994.
The motion was unanimously carried.
Councilmember Birdsall briefly stepped down from the podium at 1:02 AM.
Uraencv Ordinance to Allow Property Clearance for Fire Protection Purooses
City Attorney Field presented the staff report.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Roberts to
approve staff recommendation as follows:
RECOMMENDATION:
23.1 Read by title only and adopt an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 93-23
URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
BRUSH FOR FIRE PROTECTION
AN
TEMECULA PERMITTING CLEARING OF
PURPOSES
The motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: I COUNCILMEMBERS:
Councilmember Birdsall resumed her seat at 1:04 AM.
Parks, Roberts, Stone, Muf~oz
None
Birdsall
Aeemie(12141,1 11 Ol/Oul)14
CAW Coundl IVliewTe December 14. 1993
24. Consideration of Settlement Aoreement - McDowell vs. City of Temecula
City Attorney Field presented the staff report and stated there is a typographical error
in the recommendation and the amount should read ~1,607,422.15.
Councilmember Stone voiced his opposition to the settlement, stating he feels the City
will be expending more funds than this property is worth.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Roberts to
approve staff recommendation as follows:
24.1
Consider approving the settlement agreement in the action entitled City
of Temecul- v. McDowell in the amount of ~1,607.422.15.
The motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: 3 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Parks, Roberts
NOES: I COUNCILMEMBERS: Stone
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSTAIN: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Mu~oz
CITY MANAGER REPORT
None given.
CITY ATTORNEY REPORT
None given.
AlmliW121493 11 01/04/94
City Council Minute December 14. 1993
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Roberts to adjourn at
1:13 AM to · meeting on January 11, 1994, 7:00 PM, Temecula Community Center, 28816
Pujol Street, Temecula, California. The motion was unanimously carried.
J. Sal Mufioz, Mayor
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
Aeene/121413 11 01/N,/N,
ITEM
NO.
3
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLL~ON OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND
DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECITLA DOES RESOLVE,
DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A have been
audited by the City Manager, and that the same are hereby allowed in the mount of
$2,131,~10.02.
Seaion 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution.
APPROVED AND ADO~, this llth day of January, 1993.
ATTEST:
Ron Roberts, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
Reeoe 343
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA)
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby do certify that the
foregoing Resolution No. 93- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the
City of Temecula on the 11th day of January, 1993 by the following roll call vote:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCH,MEMBERS:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
CI'P( OF TEMECULA
LIST OF DEMANDS
2/09/93 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
12/16/93 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
12129/93 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
$99,226.83
01/11/94 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
$1,641,250.66
12/16/93 TOTAL PAYROLL:
$108,951.82
TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 01/11/94 COUNCIL MEETING:
$2,131,510.02
DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND:
CHECKS:
001 GENERAL $668,883.31
100 GAS TAX ~86,442.13
190 TCSD $67,342.44
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A $10,948.73
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B $18,196.51
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C $26,006.33
194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D $674,605.80
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ (CIP) 1333,871.33
250 TCSD-CIP $182,654.55
~ RDA-CIP Sl 3,870.00
SELF-INSURANCE ~3,836.64
310 VEHICLES $1,728.71
320 INFORMATIONS SYSTEMS $16,522.33
330 COPY CENTER $7,245.96
340 FACILITIES $803.43
$2,022,558.20
PAYROLL:
001 GENERAL (PAYROLL) ~8,9.524.09
100 GAS TAX (PAYROLL) $I 7,459.61
190 TCBD (PAYROLL) $16,5S9.84
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A (PAYROLL) $433.41
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C (PAYROLL) $1,715.25
300 SELF-INSURANCE (PAYROLL) ~59.82
320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS (PAYROLL) $1,226.44
330 COPY CENTER (PAYROLL) S895.60
340 FACILITIES $777.76
$108,951.82
TOTAL BY FUND:
, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
~E DIXON. CITY MANAGER
$2.131,510.02
VOUCHRE2
12/09/93
15:46
CITY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHEClC REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE 6
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
100 GAS TAX FUND
190 COle4UN]TY SERVICES DISTRICT
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
280 REDEVELOPI4ENT AGENCY - CIP
:300 INSURANCE FUND
:310 VEHICLES FUND
320 INFORKATION SYSTENS
330 COPY CENTER FUND
340 FAC]LITIES
TOTAL
AHOUNT
6,157.14
1,641.67
4,537.66
900.97
12,400.00
270.00
559.93
4,876.7Z
1,461.41
274.88
33,080.38
VOUCHRE2 PAGE 2
12/P""'~ 15:46
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
1283O
12979
12979
12980
12980
12980
12~81
12~81
12f81
1L:~82
12982
12982
12982
1298
12/9B.~
1;
1298/,
12985
12986
12987
12987
12987
12988
12988
12988
12988
12989
12989
12989
12990
129~0
12~1
12991
12~1
13r..---
CHECK VENDOR VENDOR
DATE IlLleER MANE
12/02/93
12/09/93
1210~1rt3
· 1210919S
12/09/93
12/09/93
12/09/93
12/09/93
12/0~/93
12/09/93
12/09/93
12/09/93
12/0~/93
12/09/93
12/09/93
1Z/09/93
12/09/93
12/09/93
12/09/93
12/09/93
12/09/93
12/09/93
12/09/93
12/0~/93
1210~193
1210~193
12/0~/93
12109193
1210~1<~
12109193
12109193
12/09/f3
12/09/93
12/09/93
12/09/93
12/0~/93
12/0~/93
001240 OLD TOil TEMECULA FERCH
COX, MARY MARGARET
000100 ALLIED BARRICADE CONPAN
000100 ALLIED BARRICADE CONPAN
000101 APPLE ONE
000101 APPLE ONE
000101 APPLE ONE
000122 BSN SPORTS
000122 BSN SPORTS
000122 BSN SPORTS
000135
000135
000135
000135
CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER
CENTRAL CITIES S]GN SER
CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SIR
CENTRAL CITIES SIGN
000143
000143
000143
COPYLINE CORPORATION
COPYLINE CORPORATION
COPYLINE CORPORATION
000152 CALIFORNIA PARK & RECRE
000155 DAVLIN
000166 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO
000166
000166
000166
TEMECULA FLOMER CORRAL
TEMECULA FLOi~ER CORRAL
TEMECULA FLOMER CORRAL
000177
000177
000177
000177
GLENNIE$ OFFICE PlffiDUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRCOUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PROOUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
000184 GTE
000184 GTE
000184 GTE
000186 HANKS HARDMARE
000186 HANKS HARDMARE
000192
000192
000192
0001~2
0001~2
GLOBAL COMPUTER $UPPLIE
GLOBAL COMPUTER $UPPLIE
GLOBAL COleqJTER SUPPLIE
GLOBAL COMPUTER $UPPLIE
GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE
CITY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIORS
ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM
DESCRIPTION NUMBER AleXINT
FUNDING FOR OLD TOHN Sl 280-199-999-5264
**COX, NARY/DOL 08/11/9 300-19~-~9-5207
LARGE BACK BRACES FOR
TAX
100-1&~.-~-5218
100-164-99~-5218
TFJP.FOR FINANCE DEPT.
TENP.FOR FINANCE DEPT.
TEMP. ~BER 2.3, 1995
001-140-~-5118
001-140-9~9-5118
001-140-9~9-5118
8ZlXXXXX TABLE TENNIS H
FREIGHT
TAX
190-180-999-5301
190-180-999-5301
190-180-999-5301
DOTS
HINDING ROAD SIGNS
ROAD SIONS
TEHP NO PARKING SIGNS
100-164-~-5244
100-164-999-52z~
100-164-~-52~
100-164-~-5244
RICOH 5000 TONER FOR 55
FREIGHT
TAX
330-199-999-5220
330-199-999-5220
330-199-999-5220
MEllERSH I P/PARKER
190-180-999-5226
VIDEO/AUDIO TAPES
001 - 100-999- 5250
PRELIMINARY TITLE REPOR 280-1790
FLOMERS/RUTH CHESHER
FLOI4ERS/J. KIRCHGASSNER
FLOMERS/SANDEE FLAINER
001-2170
001-2170
001-2170
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE $U
MONTHLY ORGANIZER
MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES
001-110-999-5220
1~0-180-~-5220
001-140-~9~-5220
001-140J~9-5220
TCSD PHONE
909-695-3539 NOv
909-699-2309 NOV
320-199-~-5208
320-199-999-5208
320-199-~-5208
MISt SUPPLIES & EQUIPfiE 1~0-180-;-5212
MZSC. SMALL TOOLS & EQU ~0-199-~q~-5242
C220~ALQ200/300 RIBBON 320-199-;-5221
C2358 ALQ200/300 BLK RI 320-199-~q~-5221
C3589 HP LASERJET 4 TON 320-199-9~-5221
FREIGHT 320-19~-q~-5221
TAX 320-199-9~-5221
12,000.00
270.00
82.86
6.42
123.84
30.96
42.57
:~0.00
:~..00
26.35
134.69
221.30
202.03
53.87
5/~.00
5.~
42.16
110.00
373.03
400.OO
45.52
45.26
45.52
41.~
18.54
13.~
2,247.27
25.45
21.41
121.60
30.18
140.28
38.28
265.98
9.38
3~.45
CHECK
AMOUNT
12,000.00
270.00
89.28
197.37
4OO .35
611.89
592.08
110.OO
373.03
400.OO
136.30
108.62
2,294.13
151.78
~88,37
VOUCliE2
12/09/93
15:~6
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR
NUFIBER DATE NUI4BER
12f~2 1210~/g3 0001f3
12F73 12lOg/f3 000201
1299/, 12/09/9~ 000214.
12995 12/09/93 000224.
12996 12/09/93 000239
12997 12/09/93 00024.8
12997 12/09/93 00024.8
12998 12/09/93 000262
12999 12/09/93 000279
13000 12/09/93 000280
13000 12/09/93 000280
13001 12/09/93 000291
13001 12/09/93 000291
13001 12/09/93 000291
13002 12/09/93' 000305
13003 12/09/93 000306
13004. 12/09/93 000307
13004 12/0~;/93 000307
13004 12/09/93 000307
13005 12/09/93 000308
13006 12/09/93 000320
13007 12/0~;/z;3 000326
13007 12/09/93 000326
13007 12/09/93 000326
13008 12/0~;/93 000345
1300~; 12/09/93 000375
13010 12/09/93 000403
13011 12/09/93 000406
13012 12/09/93 0004,23
13012 12/09/93 000~23
CITY OF TEHECtJLA
VOUCHER/CHECK REG]STER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VENDOR
NAHE
ICHA
JENHACO
LUNCH & STUFF CATERING
FiELAD & ASSOCIATES
OLSTEN TEFiPORARY SERVIC
PETROLANE
PETROLANE
RAHCHO MATER
SAYRE, RICK
SC SIGNS
SC SIGNS
SPEE DEE OIL CHANGE & T
SPEE DEE OIL CHANGE & T
SPEE DEE OIL CHANGE & T
TARGET STORE
TEFiECULA VALLEY PIPE
TEFIECULA TROPHY
TEFiECULA TROPHY
TEMECULA TROPHY
TEMECULA T(NNE ASSOCIAT
TOIJN CENTER STATIORERS
UN]TOG RENTAL SERVICE
UN]TOG RENTAL SERVICE
UN]TOG RENTAL SERVICE
XEROX CORPOeATION BILLI
ITEM
DESCRIPTIOR
SET OF BOOKS REPORTS AN
TEEN CENTER JANITORIAL
PROJECT COMMITTEE LUNCH
PLAN CHECKING FEE/NOV
RECEPTIOR/B&S TEI4P
FUEL
FU~L
RP CERTIFICATION
REINB LUNCH WDEPUTY DA
PLANNING SIGNS
CITY COUNCIL SIGNS
REPAIR & MAINT. CITY VE
CORSICA LOF
REPAIR & HA]NT. CITY VE
RECREATION SUPPLIES
SMALL TOOLS
kEY CHAINS
LOGO-ONE SIDE/INFOR ORE
TAX
NOV SET UP/DEC RENT
OFFICE SUPPLIES
2 SETS OF UNIFORMS CLEA
2 SETS OF UNIFOR!4S CLEA
STERLING & REED UNIFORFi
FIETER USAGE; 5100 COPIE
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHOR 909-202-4.759 TE OCT
SHNiN SCOTT POOL & SPA POOL SERVICE & MAZNTEHA
RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF EXTRA DUTY PARK NANOR A
H & H CRAFT & FLORAL SU RECREATIONAL SUPPLIES
H & H CRAFT & FLORAL SU RECEEATIONAL SUPPLIES
ACCOUNT
liJllER
001-110-;-5228
1~0-181 -;-5212
1~0-180-;-5260
001 -, 162-999-524.8
001-162-999-511~;
190-180-999-5263
190-180-999-5263
100-164.-999-524.0
001-100-999-5260
001-161-999-5256
001-120-999-52/,/,
310-164.-999-5214.
310-162-999-5214.
310-164.-999-5214.
190-180-999-5301
190-180-999-5212
001-100-999-5265
001 - 100- 999- 5265
001 - 100-999-5265
001-1OO-999-52./,4.
190-180-999-5220
100-164-999-524.3
100-164-999-524.3
190-180-999-524.3
330-199-999-5259
001-162-999-5208
190-180-999-5212
001-170-999-5288
190-180-999-5301
190-180-999-5301
ITER
14.5.59
4.00.00
130.00
649.4.3
218.4.0
16.87
73.35
109.00
15.28
180,00
180.00
20.99
20.99
20.99
57.4.7
4.2.02
206.70
173.24.
29.45
615.00
87.55
5.25
17,77
16.10
62.15
843.4.0
10.70
27.50
PAGE 3
AMOUNT
165.59
4.00.00
130. O0
649.4.3
218.4.0
90.22
109.00
15.Z8
62'~
57.4.7
4.2.02
4.09.39
615.00
87.55
39.10
62.15
8/,3.4.0
VOUCHRE2 CiTY OF TEHECULA
12/~""~ 15:&6 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE 4
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VEIl)OR ITEM ACCOUNT
NLNBER DATE NUMBER NH DESCRIPTION lIMBER
ITEM
AHOUNT
CHECK
NI)UNT
13013 12/09/93 000~27 ARTESIA INPLEHENT
REPLACE SOLEHOED
310-180-999-5214
451
451.47
13014 12/09/93 000428 HORIZON MATER
DEC COOLER/NOV MATER 190-182-999-52&0
36.85
36.85
13015 12/09/93 000/~2 COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS ALARM MONITORING; CITY 3M)-199-999-5250
135.00
135.00
13016 12/09/93 000~78 FAST SIGNS
SIGNS/HOLIDAY PARADE 190-183-999-537Q
131.89
131.89
13017 12/09/93 000558 ADVANCED 14081LECOMH MONTH SERVICE CIINffiE 320-1~-;-5209
236.25
236.25
13018 12/09/93 000580 PHOTO MORKS
13018 12/09/93 000580 PHOTO MORKS
FILM, SLIDES/DEVELOM4EN 190-180-999-5301
CONVERT PICTURES INTO S 190-180-999-5250
72.68
71.12
143.80
13019 12/09/93 000587 HUNOZ, MARIO
SENION CENTER JANITOR 1~0-181J~9-5250
140.00
140.00
13020 12/09/93 000603 CABLE & WIRELESS CONUN 10/16-11/15/93 XCA81143 320-199-9f9-5208
13021 12/09/93 000637 BLACK VOICE NEWS, THE LEGAL ADVERTISING 001-120-999-5256
1,566.79
122.53
1,566.79
122.53
13022 12/09/~3 0006~3 FORTNER HAIU)WARE NISC SLIPPLIES 190-180-;-5212
13022 12/09/93 000643 FORTNER HARDMARE NISC SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5212
1' 12/09/93 000645 SMART & FINAL PROGRAM SUPPLLIES 190-180-999-5301
247.60
14.39
80.04
261.~
13024 12/09/93 000649 HIJNOZ, SAL J.
REINB CiTY DESIGN gORKS 001-1OD-999-5258
54.52
54.52
13025 12/09/93 000668 TINNY D. PRODUCTiONS ENTERTAINHENT/HOLIDAY p 001-150-999-5265
350.00
350.00
13026 12/09/93 000680 ANS-TMS POSTAGE 001-100-999-5230
13026 12/09/93 000680 ANS-TNS POSTAGE 001-110-999-5230
13026 12/09/93 000680 AHS-TNS POSTAGE 001-140-999-5230
13026 12/09/93 000680 AHS-TMS POSTAGE 001-150-999-5230
13026 12/09/93 000680 ANS-TNS POSTAGE 001-120-999-5230
13026 12/09/93 000680 ANS-TMS POSTAGE 001-161-999-5230
13026 12/09/93 000680 ANS-TNS POSTAGE 001-162-999-5230
13026 12/09/93 000680 ANS-TNS POSTAGE 001-163-999-5230
13026 12/09/93 000680 ANS-TMS POSTAGE 190-180-999-5230
13027 12/09/93 000704 SKS, INC./INLAND OIL FUEL 190-180-999-5263
13027 12/09/93 000704 SKS, INC./INLAND OIL FUEL 100-16/,-999-5263
13027 12/09/93 00070~ SKS, INC./INLAND OIL FUEL 001-162-999-5263
10.99
238.24
302
69.71
200.11
209.77'
77.98
224.15
183.38
42.93
289 .)0
37.51
1,516.38
13028 12/09/93 000~4 A & R OUSTON SCREEN PR! 15 JACKETS/ROCKY COLA 190-183-999-5380
13028 12/09/93 000724 A & R OUSTON SCREEN PRI SATIN AMARD JACKETS 190-183-~-5380
13028 12/09/93 000724 A & R OUSTON SCREEN PRI XXL JACKETS 190-183-999-5380
13028 12/09/93 000724 A & R OUSTON SCREEN PRI TAX 190-183-999-5380
452.55
420.00
64.00
37.51
974.06
13029 12/09/93 000907 TEMEOULA CAR WASH OIL CHANGES/CAR MASHES 310-164-999-5214
13029 12/09/93 000907 TENEOULA CAR MASH OIL CHANGES/CAR MASHES 310-110-999-5214
13r" 12/09/93 000946 DISCOUNT FEED & TACK K-9 DOG FO00 001-170-999-5327
35.35
10.14
86.16
45.49
86.16
VOUCHRE2
12/09/93
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUNBER
13Q31
13032
1305"J
130~
13035
13035
13035
13035
13036
13037
13037
13037
13037
13037
13037
13037
13037
13037
13037
13037
13038
13039
13039
13039
1304,0
13041
13042
13043
15:/,6
CHECK
DATE
12109193
12/09/93
12/09/93
12109193
12/09/93
12/09/93
12/09/93
12/09/93
12/09/93
12109193
12109193
12109193
12109193
12109/93
12/09/93
12109193
12109193
12/09/93
12/09/93
12/09/93
12/09/93
12/09/93
12/09/93
12109193
12109193
12109193
12/09/93
12/09/93
VENDOR
NNER
0009/,9
000980
00O993
001029
001056
001056
001036
001056
001076
001123
001123
001123
001123
001123
001123
001123
001123
001123
001123
001123
001209
001219
001219
001219
0012/.1
001242
001243
0012~/*
GlOI RENTALS
~ST IRRIGATION SUPPLY
FREEDCN COFFEE, INC,
DATA QUICK
EXCEL LANOSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
lIESTERN MASTE
KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIE
KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPL]E
KNOX INDUSTRIAL $UPPL]E
KNOX INDUSTRIAL $UPPLIE
KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIE
KNOX INDUSTRIAL $1,1PPLIE
KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIE
KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIE
KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPL]E
KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIE
KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIE
VAULT, THE
TENECULA VALLEY LASER R
TENECULA VALLEY LASER R
TENECULA VALLEY LASER R
REED, JIM
NAT/ONAL TECHNICAL INFO
PALNOUIST, HARY
GREENBERG, KRISTZN
CITY OF TB4ECIJLA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEN
DESCRIPTION
RENTAL OF GENERATOR/PAR
glLKINS RING/DIAPHRAGN
COFFEE SERVICE; CiTY HA
DATA SERVICE
NOV LANDSPMAINT
PROVIDE I.ABOR AND MATER
PROVIDE LABOR ~ MATER
LABOR
NOV 93 STD NO CHARGE
BOLT, RIVETS, ALLEN HEA
TAX
GR5 CAP SCREW
TAX
GR5 CAPSCREW
TAX
CREDIT/INVOICED WR AMOU
CREDIT/gRONGE DRDER
9/,7813 "Dn CELL BATTERI
94.781/* "C' CELL BATTER]
TAX
MICROFORM STORAGE BOXES
OZONE FILTER
SERVICE - CLEANING
TAX
REIN EXPENSES DURING PR
1987 CORPS lETLAND MANU
CONTRACTED CLASS PAYMEN
EXERCISE INSTRUCTOR PAY
ACCOUNT
NUNBER
1~0-183-FR-5370
W0-180-;-5212
::~0-1~-;-5250
320-1~J~q-5250
193-180-999-5/.15
193-180-999-5/.15
193-180-999-5/.15
193-180-999-5/.15
190-180-999-5238
100-16/*-999-5218
100-16/*-999-5218
100-16/*-999-5218
100-164-999-5218
100-16/*-999-5218
100-16/*-999-5218
100-16/,-999-5218
100-164-999-5218
100-164-999-5/.02
100-164-999-5/.02
100-164-999-5402
001-120-999-5220
320-199-999-5215
320-199-999-5215
320-199-999-5215
190-180-999-5260
001-163-999-5228
190-183-999-5330
190-183-9~-5330
ITB
55.00
9.50
405.97
200.00
120.00
175.00
/*55.00
5~6.15
/*2.33
~6.50
3.66
15.50
1.20
18/*.25-
50.10-
/,8.00
43.20
7,07
29.00
5.00
195.00
.39
70.69
29.0O
1/.5.60
204.80
PAGE 5
leOtiNT
55.00
9.50
109.70
90.79
900.97
655.00
519.20
29.00
20O.39
70.69
29.0O
1/.5.60
204.80
TOTAL CHECKS
VOUCHRE2 PAGE 7
12//""'~ 15:50
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERZOOS
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
100 GAS TAX FUND
190 CONI4UN[TY SERVICES DISTRICT
191 TCSO SERVICE LEVEL A
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
19'5 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND
250 CAPITAL PROJECTS - TCSD
300 INSURANCE FUND
310 VEHICLES FUND
320 INFORI4ATIOR SYSTEME
330 COPY CENTER FUND
340 FACILITIES
TOTAL
aT
122,955.93
21,977.86
18,016.~
9,508.4.0
18,196.51
2,396.75
/,5,695.87
9/2.55
755.12
1,458.0~
328.55
269,000.33
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEHECULA
12/16/93 15:50 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE I
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTZOR 1IIBER
1304~
12/15/93 001255 GEUBAUGH & SONS, INC. RELEASE OF JUDGENENT L[ 210-190-134-580~
317623 12/16/93 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 001-20fi)
317623 12/16/93 00028~ FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 100-2070
317623 12/16/93 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 190-2070
317623 12/16/93 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 191-20fi}
31762~ 12/16/93 O0O283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 00028~ FEDERAL 193-2070
317623 12/16/93 000?.83 FIRSTAX ([RS) 000283 FEDERAL 300-2070
317623 12116/93 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 320-20713
317623 12116193 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 330-2070
317623 12/16/93 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 3/,0-2070
317623 12/16193 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 HEDICARE 001-2070
317623 12116193 000283 FIRSTAX ([RS) 000283 HEDICARE 100-2070
317623 12/16/93 000283 FIRSTAX ([RS) 000283 MEDICARE 190-2070
317623 12/16/93 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 MED]CARE 191-2070
317623 12/16/93 00O283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 193-2010
317623 12116193 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 NEDICARE 300-2070
317623 12/16/93 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICAlRE 320-2070
317623 12/16/93 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 NED]CARE 330-2070
317623 12/16/93 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 000283 NED]CARE 3~0-2070
ITEM
AHOUNT
10,000.00
12,7.15.7V
2,880.22
2,281.89
84.62
269.61
8~.25
267.11
76.58
3.37
2,548.55
630.73
571.60
16.09
19.78
65.02
22.86
23.30
C~ECK
N:IaJNT
10,000.00
22,560.~6
396528 12/16/93 0002~4 FIRSTAX (EDD) O00A~ EDI 001-2070
396528 12/16/93 000~/:/: FIRSTAX (El)D) 000444 SO1 100-2070
396528 12/16/93. 000~4 FIRSTAX (EDD) 0004~4 SOl 190-2070
396528 12/16/93 000~ FIRSTAX (EDD) 00044~ EDI 191-2070
396528 12/16/93 0004~ FIRSTAX (El)D) 0004~ SOl 193-2070
396528 12/16/93 0004~4 FIRSTAX (EDD) 0004,~ SOl 300-2070
39/,528 12/16/93 000~ FIRSTAX (EDD) 0004/~ SOl 330-2070
396528 12/16/93 000/~ FIRSTAX (EDD) 0004~4 SOl 3/,0-2070
396528 12/16/93 O00~z, FIRSTAX (EDD) 0004~4 STATE 001-2070
396528 12/16/93 00044/, FIRSTAX (EDD) O004J~ STATE 100-2070
396528 12/16/93 000~ FIRSTAX (EDD) 0004~4 STATE 190-2070
396528 12/16/93 000~ FIRSTAX (EDD) 00064~ STATE 191-2070
396528 12/16/93 00044~ FIRSTAX (EDD) 0002~4 STATE 193-2070
394528 12/16/93 000~ FIRSTAX (EDD) 000644 STATE 300-2070
396528 12/16/93 000~ FIRSTAX (EDD) 000/,~ STATE 320-2070
396528 12/16/93 000~ FIRSTAX (EDD) 00044~ STATE 330-2070
~4~.58
120.01
160.16
7.22
26.93
3.05
10.25
10.~
3,3/,1.88
700.73
489.56
21.66
69.91
25.55
56.65
13.~8
5,482.16
13068 12/16/93 HALETIN, DAN HALETIN/REIMB NOTARY SE 1~0-180-~-5226
10.00
10.00
130~9 12/16/93 000100 ALLIED BARRICADE CONPAN LIGHT BLUB FOR LIGHT TO 100-1(~-;-5218
21.55
21.55
13050 12/16/93 000125 CALED FINANCING ECONOHIC DEVE 001-160-~-5258
130.00
130.00
13051 12/16/93 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, PUBLIC OFFICIAL BOND 300'1f9-~-5200
500.00
500.00
13052 12/16/93 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS HAIL/SYSTEM SOURCE 001-160-;-5230
9.00
13053 12/16/93 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PROOUCT MISt OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-161-;-5220
13053 12/16/93 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PROOUCT PENS 001-161-;-5220
13053 12/16/93 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PROOUCT NONATHLY TABBED CALENDA 001-161-999-5220
352.21
5.37
6.~
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEHECIJLA
12/?''''~ 15:50 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOtJNT
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER
ITF.~
AIK)UNT
CHECK
AII)UNT
13053 12/16/93 000177 GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISt, OFFICE SUPPLIES; 001-162-999-57.20
13053 12116193 000177 GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-1&0-999-5220
13053 12/16/93 000177 GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT HISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-160-999-5220
13053 12116193 OOO177 GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT NISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-160-999-5220
9.64
32.56
20.17
35.1)6
A59.03
13054 12/16/93 00018z, GTE
909-699-8632 NOV 93 320-1~-~9-5208
16.55
16.55
13055 12/16/f3 000186 HANKS HARDMARE
MISC. SUPPLIES ' NUTS, 100-164-999-5262
52.50
52.50
13056 12/16/93 000193 ICMA
GB-EFFECTIVE C00NtJNICAT 001-161-~-5228
32.65
32.65
13057 12/16/93 000196 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST 4 000196 DEF COHP 001-2080
13057 12116193 000196 ICNA RETIREMENT TRUST 6 00019~ DEF Cl)NP 100-2080
13057 12116193 000196 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST 6 00019/, DEF COMP 190-2080
13057 12116193 000194 ICNA RETIREMENT TRUST 6 000194 DEF CONP 191-2080
13057 12/16/93 000194 ICIIA RETIREMENT TRUST 6 000194 DEF CONP 193-2080
13057 12/16/93 000194 ICNA RETIREMENT TRUST 6 000194 DEF CCNP 300-2080
13057 12/16/93 000194 ICI4A RETIREMENT TRUST 6 000194 DEF CCNP 3/,0-2080
13058 12/16/93 000198 INTERNATIONAL _r'~I__NCIL 0 DUES THROUGH 1/95 001-110-999-5Z26
1,601.34
56~ .36
497.76
~.08
61
25
50.00
250.00
2,813.56
250.00
l~/J)rd~ 12/16/93 000206 KINKO'S COPIES COPIES 001-110-~-5222
13b~ 12/16/93 000209 L & M FERTILIZER HEED EATER SUPPLIES 100-164-999-5218
63.53
63.53
3A .60
13061 12/16/93 000216 LUNCH & STUFF CATERING CITY CCXJtlCIL MEETING 001-100-999-5260
80.00
80.00
13062 12/16/93 000219 MARTIN 1-HOUR PHOTO
13062 12/16/93 000219 HARTIN 1-HOUR PHOTO
PHOTO DEVELOPING AUTHOR 001-163-999-5250
PHOTO DEVELOPING AUTHOR 001-163-999-5250
82.50
105.12
187.62
13063 12/16/93 000239 OLSTEN TEMPORARY SERVIC RECEPTION WE 11/28/93 001-162-999-5119
165.60
165.60
13064 12/16/93 000243 PAYLESS DRUG STORE
FILM AND FILM PROCESSIN 001-162-999-5250
7.83
13065 12/16/93 0002A6 PERS EMPLOYEES, RETIREM 0002~6 PER REDE 001-2130
13065 12/16/93 0002~6 PERS EMPLOYEES' RET]REM 000266 PER REDE 100-2130
13065 12/16/93 0002/,6 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000266 PERS RET 001-2390
13065 12/16/93 0002~6 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 0002/,6 PERS RET 100-2390
13065 12/16/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 PERS RET 190-2390
13065 12/16/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 PERS RET 191-2390
13065 12/16/93 000246 PER$ EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 PERS RET 193-2390
13065 12/16/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 PERS RET 300-2390
13065 12/16/93 000266 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 PERS RET 320-2390
13065 12/16/93 000246 PERS EIIPLOYEES' RETIREIq 000246 PERS RET 330-2390
13065 12/16/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREN 000246 PERS RET 3~0-2390
13065 12/16/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREH 000246 SURVIVOR 001-2390
13065 12/16/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES, RETIREM 000246 SURVIVOR 100-2390
13065 12/16/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 SURVIVOR 190-2390
13065 12/16/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 SURVIVOR 191-2390
13065 12/16/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 SURVIVOR 193-2390
I:Y"" 12/16/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 SURVIVOR 300-2390
107.35
107.35
10,976.83
2,5T~.76
2,4,86.68
80.06
28/, .39
94.20
232.35
194.86
122.01
51.17
12.27
13.2~
.~2
1./~,
.46
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TENECULA
12/16/93 15:50 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOB ALL PERIODS
PAGE 3
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOB VENDOB ]TEN ACCOUNT
NUNBER DATE NUIIER NANE DESCK]PTIOB NUNBER
ITEN
ANOUNT
NeOUNT
13065 12/16193 0002/,6 PERS ENPLOYEES' RETIREN 0002/~ SUitVii 320-2390
13065 12/16/93 0002/,6 PERS EHPLOYEES' RETZREI, I 0002/,6 SURVIVOR 330-2390
13065 12/16/93 000266 PERS ENPLOYEES' RETIREM 0002/,6 SURVIVOR 360-3390
17,251.68
13066 12/16/93 0002/,8 PETROLANE FUEL 001-162-999-5263
1&&.37
1(~ .37
13067 12/16/99 000269 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH RE]II 190-183-999-5320
13067 12/16/93 000269 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH RE]II 190-180-999-5220
13067 12/16/93 000269 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REINB 1~0-181-~-5301
115.07
69.27
37.90
202.26
13068 12/16/99 000251 PLANNING CENTER, THE DEVELOPHENT CODE PROCES 001-161-99~-52~8
355.12
355.12
13069 12/16/93 000256 PRESS ENTERPRISE
CUSTODIAN JOB ANMOUNCEN 001-150-999-525&
13070 12/16/99 000262 RANCHO WATER 10/11-11/09/93 MATER 190-181-999-5260
13070 12/16/99 000262 RANCHO HATER MATER
13070 12/16/99 000262 RANCHO MATER MATER 191-180-999-52~0
13070 12/16/99 000262 RANCHO HATER MATER 199-180-~-5240
13070 12/16/99 000262 RANCNO HATER CREDIT FIRE HETER CHG 190-180-99~-5240
13070 12/16/93 000262 RANCHO MATER MATER 199-180-999-5260
90.70
26.59
2,132.0~
116.62
938.62
283.29-
7~6.10
3,674.68
13071 12/16199 000291 SPEE DEE OIL CHANGE & T REPAIR & NAINT. CITY VE 310-162-999-5216
13072 12/16/~3 000316 THOBNHILL, GARY LEAGUE OF CC/SAN FRAN 001-161-999-5258
20.99
62.00
13073 12/16/93 000320 TO~NE CENTER STATIONERS OFFICE SUPPLIES
190-180-999-5220
31.67
31.47
13074 12/16/93 000325 UNITED HAY OF THE INLAN 000325 Ug 001-2120
13074 12116/93 000325 UNITED HAY OF THE ]NLAN 000325 IN 190-2120
87.00
17.50
10~.50
13075 12/16/93 000326 UNZTOG RENTAL SERVICE
13075 12/16/~J 000326 UNZTOG RENTAL SERVICE
2 SETS OF UNIFORI4S CLEA 100-166-999-5243
FLOOR HAT SERVICES; CZT 3~0-199-999-5250
23.00
~.50
57.50
13076 12/16/93 0003/,8 ZZGLER, GAZL
HOLIDAY LIGHTS REFRESHN 190-183-999-5370
100.00
100.00
13077 12/16/93 000358 DIXON, DAVID F.
FINANCIAL HANAGENENT/1)E 001-110-;-5258
13078 12116193 000376 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 00-00-700-9656-01 000-0 191-180-999-5260
13078 12116193 000376 SOUTHERN CALZF EDISON 00-00-700-~&56-01080-0 191-180-~-5319
13078 12/16/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 00-00-700-9656-01080-O 191-180-~-5260
352.38
3,237.55
158.16
3,748.0~
1307~ 12/16193 000379 H. DEAN DAVZDSON
RESTROOH/SNACKBAR DES[G 210-190-136-5802
3,960.00
13080 12/16193 000389 USCIq/PEBSCO, (ONRA) 000389 PT RETZR 001-2160
13080 12/16/93 000389 USCH/PEBSCO, (OBRA) 000389 PT RETZR 100-2160
13080 12/16/93 000389 USC34/PEBSCO, (C]E. RA) 0(0):38o PT RETIR 190-2160
62.66
191.58
136.38
39O.62
13081 12/16/93 000409 VALLEN SAFETY SUPPLY SAFETY EIJIP & SUPPLIES 100-164-~-5242
13081 12/16/93 000609 VALLEN SAFETY SUPPLY TAX 100-16A-999-5242
13081 12/16/99 000/,09 VALLEN SAFETY SUPPLY SAFETY EQUIP & SUPPLIES 100-16~-999-5242
13081 12/16/93 000/,09 VALLEN SAFETY SUPPLY TAX 100-166-999-5262
664.10
49.87
64.40
6.50
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TENECULA
12/Y"~ 15:50 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VEIQOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NUISBER DATE NUMBER NN4E DESCRIPTION IIICBER
ITEM
ANGLINT
ANQUNT
13082 12/16/93 000423 H & H CRAFT & FLORAL SU PROGR~ SUPPLIES
190-180-999-5301
36.81
36.81
13083 12/16/93 000426 RANCHO iNDUSTRIAL SUPPL SENIOR CENTER SUPPLIES 190-181-~-5212
61.38
61.38
13084 12/16/93 000666 VISION CUNNIJNICJkTIOR SE 560250 26BUTTOR ADO OR
1308/, 12/16/93 0004J,6 VISION COIItlNICATION SE 700330 HANDSFREE UNIT
13084 12/16/93 000446 VISION CORI4UNICATIUN SE FREIGHT
13084 12/16/93 000/~6 VISION COI414UNICATION SE TAX
320-199-999-5242
320-199-999-5262
320-199-999-5262
320-199-999-5262
285. O0
126.00
9.00
31 .fi)
13085 12/16/93 000519 SOIJTH CIXJNTY PEST CONTR NOV 93 PEST CONTROL 3/,0-199-999-5250
13085 12/16/93 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR NOV PEST CONTROL/OLD BU 3~0-199-999-5250
62.00
42.00
84.00
13086 12/16/93 000525 PARKS, RONALD J.
13086 12/16/93 000525 PARKS, RONALD J.
LCC HAYORS & COUNCIL CO 001-i00-999-5258
95TH ANNUAL COliF LCC 001-100-999-5238
49.81
71.80
121.61
13087 12/16/93 080537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI 10/31-11/30/~3
13087 12/16/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDi 10/31-11/30/93
13087 12/16/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDZ 10/31-11/30/93
13087 12/16/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI 10/31-11/30/93
13087 12/16/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDZ 11/01-11/30/93
13087 12/16/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFONNZA EDZ 10/31-11/30/93
I~/O~Z 12/16/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI 10/31-11/30/93
1' 12/16/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDi 10/31-11/30/93
1~_, 12/16/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI 10/31-11/30
13087 12/16/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI 10/31-11/30
13087 12/16/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI 10/31-11/30
13087 12/16/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED] 10/31-11/30
13087 12/16/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED! 11/31-11/30
13087 12/16/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED! 06/15-11/30/93
13087 12/16/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI 10/31-11/30/93
13087 12/16/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED! 09/30-10/~1/93
13087 12/16/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED! 10/31-11/30/93
13087 12/16/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED! 10/31-11/30
13087 12/16/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI 10/31-11/30
13087 12/16/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED] 10/31-11/30/93
13087 12/16/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI 11/01-11,30
13087 12/16/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI 10/31-11/30/93
13087 12/16/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDZ 10/31-11/30
13087 12/16/93 080537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI 10/31-11/30
13087 12/16/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDZ 10/31-11/30
13088 12/16/93 000621 MESTERH RIVERSIDE COUNC 93 MEMBERSHIP DUES
13089 12/16/93 000722 SOUTHERN CAL. ASSOC. OF RENEW MEMBERSHIP
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
191-18Q-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
192-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
001-100-999-5226
081-162-999-5226
41.61
69.65
20.~
~.~
8.~
~.37
~.22
39.50
~.57
45.51
63,57
18,196.51
133.19
117.71
33.02
63.~
30.~
30.~
25.00
23,596.25
8,500.00
25.00
13090 12/16/93 000726 A & R CUSTOM SCREEN PRI 19 HOOOED SIrcATS 190-183-999-5380
13090 12/16/93 000726 A & R CUSTOM SCREEN PRZ 16 JACKETS/DIAliNg) BOYS 190-183-99~-5380
~89.80
521.51
911.31
13091 12/16/93 000765 AT & T * CELLULAR
619-987-1828-1 NJIq NOV 081-160-999-5208
13P 1z/16/93 000~56 lPS SERVICES, INC. SENIOR CENTER 210-199-801-58Q~ 3,6'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'38.50
VOUCHRE2 PAGE 5
12/16/93 15:50 ~
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDDR VENDOIl
NUMBER DATE NLJNBER NAME
13092 12/16/93 000756 IPS SERVICES, INC,
13093 12/16/93 000757 CONCZSE CONSTRUCTZON
13093 12116193 000757 CONCISE IDNSTRUCTION
13093 12/16/93 000757 CONCISE CONSTRUCT]ON
13093 12/16/93 000757 CONCISE CONSTRUCTION
13093 12/16/93 000757 CONCISE CONSTRUCTION
13093 12/16/93 000757 CONCISE CONSTRUCT]ON
13094 12/16/93 0007(~ DOS GRINGOS
13095 12/16/93 0007'91 CPSRPC
CITY OF TBIECtJLA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIOI)S
ITEM ACCOUNT
DESCRIPTION NWIBER
RETENTION 210-20~5
AIMlffi FON EXTRA M3RK 210-199-801-580~
BUILDING PORTION OF PRO 210-199-801-580A
CONCISE CONSTRUCTION 210-1~-801-5806
ADJUSTlENT 210-1~-801-580~
RETENTION 210-2035
EXTRA WORK 210-1~-801-5804
SANTA BREAKFAST
1~0-183-~-5370
CPRS COliF FEB 3-6 1993 190-180-999-5258
13096 12/16/93 000822 DWIGHT FRENCH & A$SOCIA PARTIAL RETENTION
100-2035
130~7 12/16/93 000883 NONTELEONE EXCAVATING EXTRA WORK REQUIRED FOR 100-16~-999-5401
13097 12116193 000883 MC)NTELEORE EXCAVATING 288~1VALLEJO CONSTRUCT 100-16~-999-5401
13098 12/16/93 000~10 KOLL MANAGEMENT SERVICE DEC f3 RENT 1~0-182-~-5234
13099 12/16/93 000918 OAK-RIDGE INTERNATIONAL PAPER & DRILL PARTS 330-199-999-5242
13100 12/16/93 000937 C.M. ENGINEERING ENGINEERING SERVICE/MID 210-190-119-5802
13100 12/16/93 000937 C.M. ENGINEERING CR/FINAL REPORT NOT CON 210-190-119-5802
13101 12/16/93 0009/,7 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C MISC. BLUEPRINT REPROOU 001-163-999-5268
13102 12/16/93 0009/,9 GKN RENTALS TWO MONTHS SKIPLOADER R 100-16~-999-5238
13103 12/16/93 000963 HOGAN, DAVID APA STATE CONFERENCE 001-161-999-5258
13104 12/16/93 000~60 COAST IRRIGATION SUPPLY 123(12 ORATE (53 190-180-~-5212
13105 12/16/93 000~2 RAI4ONA TZRE TIRE SERVICES FOR CZTY 310-1~-~-5214
13106 12/16/93 001002 FIRST INTERSTATE BANK - 5473(~03910032 NJM NO 001-140-~-5260
13106 12/16/93 001002 FIRST INTERSTATE BANK - 5~T'j(~03910057 NOV SN 190-180-~-5260
13106 12/16/93 001002 FIRST ZNTERSTATE BANK - 56~03910081 NOV RR 001-100-~-5260
13106 12/16/93 001002 FIRST INTERSTATE BANK - 547'~5~03910149/TS 001-163-~-5260
13107 12/16/93 001013 HINDERLITER deLN~AS & A GALES TAX AOUZT AGREENE 001-140-~-5268
13108 12/16/93 0010~6 REXON, FREEDMAN, KLEPET 200513-00ON NOV 93 001-130-~-5247
13109 12/16/93 001054 CALBO ANNUAL BUSINESS MEETING 001-162-999-5258
13110 12/16/93 001058 ACCURATE LANDSCAPE SP~TS PARK IRRIGATION
13111 12/16/93 001065 USCM/PEBSCO (DEF. CONP. 001065 DEF IDIIP
13111 12/16/93 001065 USON/PEBSCO (DEF. CONP. 001065 DEF COMP
13111 12/16/93 001065 USCM/PEBSCO CDEF. CONP. 001065 DEF CONP
1~)-180-~-5212
001-2080
100-2080
1~0-2080
ITEM
N~3UNT
4,525,00
129,Z47.:38
55,241.40-
3,001.6()-
89.98
854.50
1,030.00
3,615.61
3,042.00
12,600.00
3,376.95
116.59
475.00-
58.19
26.60
193.18
95.25
369.07
1.00
9.27
3Z3.60
76,98~.91
192.00
315.00
248.69
3,367.15
167.00
157.30
CHECK
3,276.65
27,015.00
854.50
1,030. O0
3,615.61
15,6/,2.00
3,374.93
116.59
411 .,..,.
58.19
26.40
193.18
95.25
3~.07
620.8~
192.00
315
24,8.69
VOUCHRE2 PAGE 6
12/Y"" 15:50
CiTY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERICOS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NtNBER DATE NIJMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NLI4BER
13111 12/16/93 001065 USCM/PEBSCO (DEF. CONP. Q01065 DEF COMP 3QQ-21380
13111 12/16/93 001065 USCN/PEBSCO (DEF. CONP. 001065 DEF CORP 320-2080
13112 12/16/93 001121 CREATIVE VIDEO PRCOUCTi FILMING OF CHRISTHAS PA 190-180-999-5301
13113 12/16/93 001173 KNOX INDUSTRIAL $IJPPLIE CAPSCREW 100-1t4-999-5218
13116 12/16/9~ 001152 M & P U!I)ERGROUND, iNC. RETENTIOR/CRC P~92-0898 250-2035
13115 12/16/93 001165 ENTERTAINMENT PUGLICATI INLAND EMPIRE ENTER. BU 190-183-999-5320
13116 12/16/93 001179 TREBOR COMPANY, THE
13116 12/16/93 001179 TREBOR COMPANY, THE
13117 12/16/9~ 001193 COMP LISA
13118 12/16/93 001196 MCKINLEY, STEW
X-LARGE ~HIT VEST 100-1(~-99~-5218
TAX 100-16~-99~-5218
MISC COMRJTER StJPLIES 320-199-999-5221
ENTERTAINMENT FOR VOLUN 190-180-999-5301
13119 12/16/93 001212 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS 17-8276-036-1651-1 NOV 190-181-999-5260
13120 12/16/93 001232 COMMERCIAL FURNISHING, VINYL INSTALLED 210-199-801-5804
· 17 12/16/93 001267 CENTRAL MONITORING CORP MONITORING ALARIq SYSTEM 190-181-999-5250
13122 12/16/93' OO125O mLLZANS, DiCK CONST & INSTALL DESK AT 190-180-999-5601
13173 12/16/93 001251 LONG BEACH UNIFORM CO., CiTY OF TEMECULA CODE 001'162'999'5220
13123 12/16/93 001251 LONG BEACH URIFORN CO., TAX 001-162-999'5220
13126 12/16/93 001252 FAHEY, LINDA LEAGUE OF CA CITIES CON 001'161'999'5258
13125 12/16/93 001253 RAGAN COIIIJNICATIONS WORKING COIINNICATOR 001'161'999"5226
13126 12/16/93 001256 TENECtJLA STAMP & 6RAPHI HOLIDAY SIGHTS BUTTORS 190-183'999'5370
13127 12/16/93 001256 HARRIOTT RESERVATIORS/CPSRPC CON 19O'180'999'5258
13128 12/16/93 001257 ZAX ELECTRONIC PUBLICAT $UBSCR]PTION/CAL]F PEAC 001'170'999'5262
13129 12/16/93 001258 BETTER LOCAL 60VERNIqENT COIN]SS]ONERS TRAINING 19O'180'999'5258
13130 12/16/93 001259 DANIEL$, DONNA (TONA) DJ SEN]OR CHRiSTHAS DAN 19O-181'999'5301
13131 12/16/93 0012&0 C.P.R.S. PARK OPERATION C.P.R.S. CONFERENCE/BH 190'180'999'5258
13132 12/16/93 001261 KNOX COMPANY, THE EMERGENCY ENTRY/KNOX BU 190'181'999-5250
TOTAL CHECKS
l TEN
NI)UNT
3
312.50
125.00
20.93
972.55
108.80
29.50
2.29
97.63
75.00
8.68
1,035.00
114.46
835.00
60.00
4.65
352.33
97.00
173,86
588.73
177,79
18.00
200.00
60.00
148.00
CHECK
AMOIJNT
3,987.42
125.00
20.93
972.55
108.80
31
97.43
73.00
8.68
1,035.00
114.66
835.00
6~ .65
352.33
97.00
173,86
588.73
177.79
18.00
200.00
148.00
269,000.33
VOUCHRE2 PAGE 8
12/2~/93 12:18 ~
CITY OF TE!qECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
100 GAS TAX FUND
190 CONI4UMZTY SERVICES DISTRICT
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
210 CAPITAL INPROVENENT PROJ FUND
280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP
300 INSURANCE FUND
310 VEHICLES FUND
320 INFORNATION SYSTENS
330 COPY CENTER FUND
TOTAL
ANOUNT
20,238.9z,
7,189.20
13,080.82
965.33
1,84,1.62
69,899.8~
100.00
1 ,~,7.33
3,533.~7
~,226.83
VOUCHRE2 PAGE 1
12//""~t 12:18
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
13137
13138
13139
13140
13141
13142
13143
13144
13144
131~
13144
13145
13145
13-u~
13,.o
13146
13146
13147
13148
13148
13149
13149
13149
13150
13150
13150
13150
13151
13151
13151
13151
13151
13151
13151
13151
CHECK
DATE
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12129/93
12/29/93
12129/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
VENDOR
NI. IqBER
000100
000102
000120
000127
000127
000127
000127
000135
000135
000135
000137
000137
000137
000144
000155
000155
000156
000156
000156
000165
000165
000165
000165
000170
000170
000170
000170
000170
000170
000170
000170
000175
NAME
GARRIS], MARIA
RICE FIRE PROTECTION
A!~ST DEVELOMqENT, INC
THE TOIIAN COMPANY
ALLIED BARRICADE CONPAN
AMERICAN FENCE COMPANY
BICKNELL TRAVEL CENTER
CALl FONNIAN - LEGAL
CALl FONNIAN - LEGAL
CALIFORNIAN - LEGAL
CALl FORNIAN - LEGAL
CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER
CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER
CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER
CHEVRON U.S.A. INC.
CHEVRON U,S,A. INC.
CHEVRON U.S.A. INC.
COSTCO WHOLESALE
DAVLIN
DAVLIN
DENT]CARE OF CALIFONN[A
DENTICARE OF CALIFORNIA
DENTICARE OF CALIFORNIA
FEDERAL EXPRESS
FEDERAL EXPRESS
FEDERAL EXPRESS
FEDERAL EXPRESS
FRANKLIN QUEST CCIe:~ANY
FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY
FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY
FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY
FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY
FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY
FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY
FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY
GFOA
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ZTEN
DESCRIPTION
REINB FOR NOTARY SERV
RICE FIRE PROTECT[ON/RE
AI~ST/REFUND FEES
TONAN COMPANY/REFUND GR
LIGHT BULB FOR LXGHT TO
TEMPORARY FENCE RENTAL
TOUR PROJECTS SANTA CRU
OPEN P.O. PUBLIC NOTICE
OPEN P.O. PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARIN
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARIN
SIGNS, POST AND RELATED
SIGNS, POST AND RELATED
SIGNS, POST AND RELATED
709-819-697-2 NOV. FUEL
789-819-697-Z NOV. FUEL
789-819-697-2 NOV. FUEL
5 POLAROID CAMERAS
AUDIO TAPE; PLANNING
VIDEO/AUDIO TAPE
INSURANCE PREMIUN/JANUA
INSURANCE PREMXUM/JANUA
INSURANCE PREMION/JANUA
MAlL/PLANNING
POSTAGE/FINANCE
POSTAGE/BUILD & SAFETY
POSTAGE BUILD & SAFETY
COMPACT STORAGE BINDER
CLASSIC STORAGE BINDERS
NONARCH STORAGE BINDER
SOFT BRIEF CASE
FREIGHT
TAX
CLASSIC STORAGE BINDERS
TAX
GFGA AWARD APPLICATION
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
190'180'999'5250
001-171-4036
001-2650
001-163-4372
100-164-999-5218
190-180-999-5238
210-190-137-5802
001-120-999-5256
001-120-999-5256
001-161-999-5256
001-161-999-5256
100-164-999-5244
100-164-999-52z~
100-164-999-52/~.
001-161-999-5262
001-170-999-5262
001-110-999-5263
001-170-999-5242
001-161-999-5250
001-100-999-5250
001-2.'7~0
100-2.~0
001-150-999-5250
001-161-999-52~0
001-140-999-5230
001-162-999-5230
001-162-999-5230
001-161-999-5220
001-161-999-5220
001-161-999-5220
001-161-999-5220
001-161-999-5220
001-161-999-5220
001-161-999-5220
001-161-999-5220
001-140-999-5250
i TEN
AMOUNT
5.00
261.00
9,103.00
700. O0
134.69
145.00
1,384.00
178.74
118.86
149.46
51.88
102.36
228.59
103.~
10.96
20,75
65.91
150.80
150.00
707.11
29.86
14.95
15.00
13.50
22,00
13.50
15.25
4.95
6.95
11.95
39.95
6.95
5.48
62.55
4.85
415.00
CHECK
AROrJNT
5.00
261. O0
9,103.00
7O0.00
134.69
145.00
1,384.00
498.94
434.39
97.62
150,80
857.11
59.79
64.25
143.63
415.00
VOUCHRE2
12129193
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
13153
13153
13153
13153
13153
13154
13154
13155
13156
13157
13157
13157
13'157
13158
13158
13158
13158
13158
13158
13158
13158
13158
13158
13158
13158
13158
13159
13159
13160
13161
13161
13162
13162
13163
13164
13164
13164
13164
13164
13164
12:18
CHECK
DATE
12/29/93
12/29193
lZ/29/93
lZ/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
lZ/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
1Z/Z9/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
lZ/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12129193
12129/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
lZ/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
VENDOR
NLllER
000177
000177
000177
000177
000177
00018~
000184
000205
000206
000228
000228
000228
000228
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000254
000254
000255
000262
000262
000280
000280
000291
000294
000294
000294
0002~4
000294
O002W~
VENDOR
NAME
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PROOUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GTE
GTE
KIDS PARTIES, ETC,
KINKO~S COPIES
MOBIL
MOBIL
MOBIL
MOBIL
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PRESS ENTERPRISE
PRESS ENTERPRISE
PRO LOCK & KEY
RANCHO WATER
RANCHO WATER
SC SIGNS
SC SIGNS
SPEE DEE OIL CHANGE & T
STATE COMPENSATIOR INS.
STATE COMPENSATION INS.
STATE COMPENSATION INS.
STATE COMPENSATION ]NS.
STATE COMPENSATION INS.
STATE COMPENSATION INS.
CITY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
MISC, OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISC, OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISC, OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISC, OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISC, OFFICE SUPPLIES
001-140-999-5220
001-140-~-5220
001-140-~-5220
001-140-~9~-5220
001-140-~-5220
909-695-3564
320-1~9-~9~-5208
100-164-~-5208
ENTERTAINMENT BRKFST W/190-18~-999-5320
CARD STOCK GENERAL PLAN 001-161-99~-5222
883 930 379 6 OCT
88~ 930 379 6 OCT
883 930 379 6 OCT
883 930 379 6 OCT
001-161-99~-5262
001-110-~9~-5263
320-1~-~-5262
001-162-99~-5263
PETTY CASH/CITY
PETTY CASH/CITY
PETTY CASH/CITY
PETTY CASH/CITY
PETTY CASH/CITY
PETTY CASH/CITY
PETTY CASH/CITY
PETTY CASH/CITY
PETTY CASH/CITY
PETTY CASH/CITY
PETTY CASH/CITY
PETTY CASH/CITY
PETTY CASH/CITY
100-164-~-5218
001-140-~9~-5260
001-150-~-5260
001-150-~9-5260
001-161-~-5262
001-161-~-5220
001-161-9q~-5250
001-161-~-5260
001-162-999-5260
001-163-~99-5250
001-100-9~-5220
001-100-~99-5258
001-100-999-5260
OPEN Po FOR ADVERTISING 001-161-999-5256
SUBSCRIPTION 12/16-2/15 190-180-999-5226
DUPLICATE KEY
190-180-999-5212
NOV WATER SERVICE
NOV WATER SERVICE
1~-180-999-5240
190-180-~-5240
SIGNS 001-120-~-52~,
OPEN PO FOR S & C SIONS 001-161-~-5256
REPAIR & NAINT, CITY VE 310-162-~-5214
ANNUAL DEPOSIT & SURCHA
ANNUAL DEPOSIT & SURCHA
CREDIT NISCLASSIFICATIO
CREDIT NISCLASSIFICATIO
CREDIT MISCLASSIFICATIO
CREDIT MISCLASSIFICAT]O
001-150-~-5250
001-1640
001-110-~-5112
001-120-~-5112
001-140-~-5112
001-150-999-5112
ITEM
AMOUNT
8,62
19,29
139,81
59,35
18.59
35.25
36.66
150.00
14,98
14.58
36.99
16.39
26.69
28.06
15.50
~.03
6.00
21.28
14.37
4.77
46.08
14.37
7.47
25.00
15.00
133,Z0
14.55
3,23
Z,626,64
268.35
135.00
135,00
423.44
8,859.00
7,571.40'
2,5&0.76'
6,245.71 -
1,818.88-
PAGE 2
CNE.CK
~ROIJNT
245.66
71.91
150.00
14,98
94,65
266.92
147.75
3.23
2,894,99
270.00
VOUCHRE2 CiTY OF TENECULA
12/7''~ 12:18 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIOOS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRiPT]ON NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AROUNT
13164 12/29/93 00029A STATE COMPENSATION INS. CREDIT M]SCLASSIFICATiO 193-180-999-5112
13164 12/29/93 000294 'STATE COMPENSATION iNS. CREDIT MISCLASSIFICATiO 300-199-999-5112
13164 12/29/93 000294 STATE COMPENSATIOR INS, CREDIT MISCLASSIFICATIO 320-199-999-5112
13164 12/29/93 000294 STATE CONPENSATIOR INS. gORKERS COMP/DEC 93 001-2.:370
13164 12/29/93 000294 STATE COMPENSATION INS. WORKERS COMP/DEC 93 100-2370
13164 lZ/29/93 000294 STATE COMPENSATION INS, WORKERS CORP/DEC 93 190-2370
13164 12/29/93 000294 STATE COMPENSATION INS, MORKERS CORP/DEC 93 191-2370
13164 12/29/93 000294 STATE COMPENSATION iNS, MORKERS COMP/DEC 93 193-2370
13164 12/29/93 000294 STATE COMPENSATION INS, WORICERS CORP/DEC 93 300-2370
13164 12/29/93 000294 STATE COMPENSATION INS, WORKERS COMP/DEC 93 320-2370
13164 12/29/93 00029~ STATE COMPENSATION iNS, WORKERS CORP/DEC 93 330-2370
13164 12/29/93 000294 STATE CONPENSAT[OR INS. WORKERS COMP/DEC 93 001-1182
13164 12/29/93 000294 STATE CORPENSATIOR INS. WORKERS CORP/DEC 93 001-161-999-5112
1,257.1~-
453.61-
1,598.73-
9,057.89
4,465.66
2,938.55
201.21
422,~5
66.90
220.52
314.34
151.6,$
4.03
5,619.89
131'65 12/29/93 000305 TARGET STORE
RECREAT[OR SUPPLIES lg0-180-~-5301
29.25
29.25
131&& 12/29/93 000307 TENECULA TROPHY TROPHIES 190-182-999-5301
25.8&
25.8&
13167 12/29/93 000320 TiE CENTER STATIONERS OFFICE SUPPLIES 190-180-{~-5220
13167 12/29/93 000320 TOWNE CENTER STATIONERS OFFICE SUPPLIES 190-180-~-5220
13167 12/29/93 000320 TO~NE CENTER STATIONERS OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-1&1-~-5220
13/lX-7 12/29/93 000320 TiE CENTER STATIONERS OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-163-99~-5220
f 12/29/93 000320 TOWNE CENTER STATIONERS OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-163-999-5220
39,62
9.72
61.12
9.20
36.51
156.17
13168 12/29/93 000322 UNIGLOBE BUTTERFIELD TR AIRFARE/OAKLAND JAN 13- 001-100-999-5258
13168 12/29/93 000322 UNIGLOBE BUTTERFIELD TR AIRFARE/SACRAMENTO JAN 001-100-999-5258
144.00
150.00
294.00
13169 12/29/93 000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE UNIFORM SET UP 190-180-999-5243
13169 12/29/93 000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE UNIFORM RENTAL 190-180-999-5243
13169 12/29/93 000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE 2 SETS OF UNIFORNS CLEA 100-164-999-5243
13169 12/29/93 000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE 2 SETS OF UNIFORMS CLEA 100-164-999-5243
13169 12/29/93 000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE UNIFORH RENTAL 190-180-999-5243
13169 12/29/93 000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE CREOIT 190-180-999-5243
13169 12/29/93 000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE CREDIT/NOT WEARABLE 190-180-999-5243
13169 12/29/93 000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE UNIFORM RENTAL 190-180-999-5243
13169 12/29/93 000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE UNIFORM RENTAL 190-180-999-5243
132.69
5.33-
23.00
23.00
16.10
2.50-
2.50-
16.10
16.10
216.66
13170 12/29/93 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI LEASE AGREEMENT/JAN 5"30-199-999-5219
2,969.95
2,969.95
13171 12129/93 000352 RIVERSIDE COUNTY ASSESS NAP COPIES
190-180-999-5224
30.50
30.50
13172 12/29/93 000364 GREEK, JUNE S.
ELECTIOR LAW 12/07-12/1 001-120-999-5261
52.00
52.00
13173 12/29/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 08/12/93-12/02/93 191-180-999-5319
13173 12/29/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 11/02/93-12/0~/93 191-180-999-5319
13173 12/29/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 11/02/93-12/0~/93 191-180-999-5319
13173 12/29/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 11/17/93-12/03/93 190-180-999-5240
13173 12/29/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF BISON 11/05/93-12/08/93 191-180-999-5319
13173 12/29/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 11/05/93-12/08/93 191-180-999-5319
13173 12/29/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EOISON 10/23/93-11/19/93 190-181-999-5240
163.00
37.11
150.15
28.47
245.86
952.53
1,643.46
VOUCHRE2 PAGE
lZ/~9/93 12:18 ~
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
13174
13174
13174
13174
13174
13174
13174
13174
13174
13174
13174
13174
13174
13174
13174
13175
13176
13177
13178
13179
13179
13180
13180
13180
13181
13182
13183
13183
13183
13183
13183
13183
13183
13183
13183
13184
13185
13186
CHECK
DATE
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
lZ/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
lZ/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
lZ/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
VENDOR
NUMBER
000375
000375
000375
000375
000375
000375
000375
000375
000375
000375
000375
000375
000375
000375
000375
000388
0013/,00
000402
000408
000409
000409
000423
000423
000423
000~26
000427
000431
000/,31
000431
000431
000431
000431
000431
000431
000431
000471
000519
000525
VENDOR
NANE
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TEL
.SOUTHERN CALl FORNIA TEL
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TEL
SOUTHERN CAL/FORNIA TEL
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TEL
SOUTHERN CAL]FORN]A TEL
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TEL
SOUTHERN CAL/FORN]A TEL
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TEL
SOUTHERN'CALIFORNIA TEL
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TEL
SOUTHERN CALIFORN]A TEL
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TEL
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TEL
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TEL
ICBO
ALEXANDER HAMILTON INST
BERG, PARK
AGRICREDIT ACCEPTANCE C
VALLEN SAFETY SUPPLY
VALLEN SAFETY SUPPLY
H & H CRAFT & FLORAL SU
H & H CRAFT & FLORAL SU
H & H CRAFT & FLORAL SU
RANCHO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL
ARTESIA IMPLEMENT
NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH
NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH
NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH
NATIORAL DENTAL HEALTH
NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH
NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH
NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH
NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH
NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH
IGOE & COMPANY
SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR
PARKS, RONALD J.
CITY OF TENEOULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERKCOS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT
NUNBER
909-202-4751TS
909-202-4752 $N
909-202-4753/BH
909-202-4754/KH
909-202-4755/SN
909-202-4756/TH
909-202-4757/JG
~-202-4758/RR
90~-202-4759/TE
909-202-4762/HE
909-202-4763/PB
909-202-4764 BB
909-202-4765 BB
~09-202-4767/GT
909-202-4769/JS
100-164-~9-5208
190-180-~99-5208
lf0-180-999-5208
1~0-180-~-5208
190-180-999-5208
320-1~-~q9-5208
001-120-999-5208
001-100-999-5208
001-162-~-5208
001-100-999-5208
001-100-~-5208
100-164-q9~-5208
100-164-999-5208
001-161-~99-5208
001-100-999-5208
'92-g3 TITLE 24 UPDATE 001-162-999-5226
PUBLICATION/HUMAN RESOU 001-150-~-5228
REINB\CERTIFICATIOR PAX 001-162-999-5261
JANUARY .LEASE
190-180-999-5239
SAFETY EQUIP & SUPPLIES 100-164-~-5242
TAX 100-164-999-5242
RECREATIONAL SUPPLIES
RECREATIONAL SUPPLIES
RECREATIONAL SUPPLIES
190-180-999-5301
190-180-999-5301
190-182-999-5301
SUPPLIES 190-181-~-5212
REPAIRS 310-180-999-5214
INSURANCE PREMIUM/JANUA O01-Z.v~O
INSURANCE' PREMIUM/JANUA 100-2340
INSURANCE PREMIUM/JANUA
INSURANCE PREM]UM/JANUA 191-2340
INSURANCE PREMIUM/JANUA 195-2340
INSURANCE PREMIUM/JANUA 300-2340
INSURANCE PREMIUM/JANUA 330-Z.',',v~0
INSURANCE PREMIUM/JANUA 001-1180
INSURANCE PREMIUM/JANUA 081-150-999-5250
FLEX PLAN AOMIN FEE/NOV 001-150-~99-5250
PEST CONTROL/NOV.
1~0-181-~9-5250
TRAMCON 2000 10/25-10/2 001-100-999-5258
ITEM
AMOUNT
74.12
141.18
37.85
49.28
38.43
35.04
37.74
57.90
51.57
80.19
46.40
55.61
59.78
172.92
5.00
45.00
846.02
503.35
38.48
27.84
21.09
38.56
28.93
164.48
621.58
170.61
130.00
7.31
8.94
4.06
32.50
48.75
15.00
29.00
34.79
· CHECK
NqOUNT
875.65
172.92
5.00
45.00
541.83
87.49
28.93
164.48
1,038.75
268.76
29. O0
----~.
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TENECULA
12/2"'~'~ 12:18 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PER[COS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAHE DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
ITEN
ANOUNT
CHECK
/INOIJNT
13187 12/29/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI 10/~1-11/30
13187 lZ/29/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI 10/31/93-11/30/93
191-180-999-5319
191-180-999-5319
40.43
42.45
82.88
13188 12/29/93 000587 MUNOZ, IqARIO
JANITORIAL 12/6-12/17 190-181-999-5250
210.00
210.00
13189 12/29/93 000603 CABLE & WIRELESS CONNUN NOV 16- DEC 15
320-199-999-5208
1,633.08
1,633.08
13190 12/29/93 000611 TEXACO REFINING & HARKE FEDERAL GAS TAX
001-110-999-526~
36.33
36.33
13191 12/29/93 000677 RANCHO SIGN & SCREENPRI BANNER HOLIDAY HONE TOU 190-180-999-5301
360.96
360,96
13192 12/29/93 000704 SKS, INC./INLAND OIL FUEL 001-110-999-5263
13192 1Z/Z9/93 000704 SKS, INC./INLAND OIL FUEL 001-162-999-526~
13192 12/29/93 000704 SKS, INC./INLAND OIL FUEL 100-164-999-526~
13192 1Z/29/9~ 000704 SKS, INC,/INLAND OIL FUEL 190-180-999-5263
19.51
62.16
407.38
65.76
554.81
13193 12/29/93 000724 A & R CUSTOM SCREEN PRI T-SHIRTS, TANK TOPS,~I~E 190-11G-~-5380
13193 12/29/93 000724 A & R CUSTOM SCREEN PRZ T-SHIRTS,TANK TOPS,SMEA 190-183-999-5380
484.88
37~. 97
864.85
13194 12/29/93 000727 NFPA
FIRE PROTECTION ASSOCIA 001-171-f99-5226
95.00
95.00
1~ 12/29/93 000756 Ips SERVICES, INC. RETENTION 210-2035 34,004.83
13,.o 12/29/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA PRENION FOR JANUARY 001-2360
13196 12/29/93 000765 GROUP AHERICA PREMION FOR JANUARY 100-2360
13196 lZ/29/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA PREM]ON FOR JANUARY 190-Z360
13196 12/29/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA PRIMION FOR JANUARY 191-2360
13196 12/29/93 000765 GROUP AHERICA PREMION FOR JANUARY 19~-2~60
13196 12/29/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA PREMION FOR JANUARY 300-Z360
13196 12/29/93 000765 GROUP AHER]CA PREMIUM FOR JANUARY 320-2~60
13196 12/29/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA PREM]ON FOR JANUARY 330-Z]60
13196 12/29/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA PREM]ON FOR JANUARY 001-2380
13196 12/29/93 000765 GROUP AERICA PREMIUM FOR JANUARY 100-2380
13196 12/29/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA PREMIUH FOR JANUARY 190-2380
13196 12/29/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA PRIMION FOR JANUARY 191-2380
13196 12/29/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA PREMION FOR JANUARY 193-2380
13196 12/29/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA PREMION FOR JANUARY 300-Z380
13196 12/29/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA PREMIUM FOR JANUARY 320-2380
13196 12/29/93 000765 .GROUP AMERICA PREM]ON FOR JANUARY 330-Z~80
13196 12/29/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA PREMIUM FOR JANUARY 001-2500
13196 12/29/93 000765 GROUP AHERICA PREMIUM FOR JANUARY 100-2500
13196 1Z/Zg/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA PREMItJN FOR JANUARY 190-2500
13196 12/29/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA PREMION FOR JANUARY 191-2500
13196 1Z/Zg/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA PREMION FOR JANUARY 193-2500
13196 12/Z9/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA PREMIUM FOR JANUARY 300-2500
13196 12/29/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA PREMION FOR JANUARY 320-2500
13196 1Z/Z9/93 000765 GROUP AMERICA PREMION FOR JANUARY 330-2500
13197 12/29/93 000770 UCR EXTENSION M:)RKSHOP/PHILLIS RUSE 190-180-999-5258
1T"' 12/29/93 O001B9 CELSOC SEMINAR 1/31/94 & 02/01 001-163-999-5261
570.00
128.25
133. O0
4.28
14.72
4.75
9.50
19.00
932.78
226.77
194.67
5.89
20.91
7.76
18.67
18.59
202.01
49.45
42.82
1.30
4.60
1.71
4.11
4,09
36.50
710.00
34,004.U
2,619.63
36.50
710,00
VOUCHRE2 PAGE 6
12/29/93 12:18 /'~
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
13199
13200
CHECK
DATE
12/29/93
12/29/93
VENDOR
NUMBER
0008~
000905
VENDOR
NAIqE
CITY OF TEHECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIOOS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
PRESENTATION PROOUCTS 6PK TAPE
TEMECULA SHUTTLE SERVIC RANCHO SPRTS PRK PROJ C
13201 12/29/93 000949 GKN RENTALS GENERATOR
13202
13203
13203
13203
13204
13205
13206
13207
13207
13207
13207
13207
12129193
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/9]
12129193
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/9]
13208
13208
13208
13209
13210
000950
000992
000992
000992
001006
001022
001028
001085
001085
001085
001085
001085
001122
001122
001122
001130
001153
001160
001189
001189
001189
CALIFORNIAN - DISPLAY JOB ANNOUNCEMENTS
RAHONA TIRE
RAffi)NA TIRE
RAHONA TIRE
REPAIRS
TIRE SERVICES CITY VEHI
CREDIT ROAD HAZARD WARR
13211
13212
13212
13212
13213
13213
13213
13213
13213
13213
13Z13
13213
13213
13214
13215
BURTRORICS BUSINESS SYS PAPER SUPPLIES
THOHPSON PUBLISHING GRO REFERENCE BOOKS
MEYER, CHUCK
INSTALLAT]ON OF RHETORE
L.N. CURTIS & SONS
L.N. CURTIS & SONS
L.N. CURTIS & SONS
L.N. CURTIS & SONS
L.N. CURTIS & SONS
PILOT GAUGE (PIEZONETER
LINE GAUGE, '2.5" SIZE,
CAP GAUGE, 2.5" SIZE, S
FREIGHT
TAX
SCOTCH PAINT CORPORAT]O 5 GALLON RECYCLE PAINT
SCOTCH PAINT CORPORATiO PAINT
SCOTCH PAINT CORPORAT]O PAINT
MK BATTERY
BATTERIES FOR CITY VEHI
FIRE PROTECTION PUBLICA 35268; BUILDING CONST.
PACTEL CELLULAR-LA 6015202120193/TH
NURRIETA DEVELOPMENT CO "EMERGENCY' REPAIR TO S
MURRIETA DEVELOPMENT CO SENIOR CENTER SE~ER LAT
NURRIETA DEVELOPMENT CO EMERGENCY REPAIR
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-161-999-5220
210-190-137-5802
190-180-999-52]8
001-150-999-5254
310-162-999-5214
310-162-999-5214
310-162-999-5214
001-163-999-5220
190-180-999-5228
320-1950
001-171-999-5242
001-171-999-5242
001-171-999-5242
001-171-999-5242
001-171-999-5242
100-164-999-5218
100-164-999-5218
100-164-999-5218
310-164-999-5214
001-171-999-5228
320-199-999-5208
190-180-999-5212
210-199-801-5804
210-199-801-5804
00119] CONP USA 875484 MEDi SEKURIT LOC 320-199-999-5242
00119] CONP USA FREIGHT 320-199-999-5242
001193 CONP USA TAX 320-199-999-5242
001193 CONP USA 227673 CD CADDY 320-199-999-5221
001193 CONP USA 849960 gRIST PAD 320-199-999-5221
001193 CONP USA FREIGHT 320-199-999-5221
001193 COMP USA TAX 320-199-999-5221
001193 CONP USA 8]7492 TEAC 1./d, FLOPPY 320-199-999-5215
001193 CONP USA TAX 320-199-999-5215
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS 11/30-12/16
001212
001219
TEMECULA VALLEY LASER R AC HIGH VOLTAGE UNIT
190-180-999-5240
320-199-999-5215
ITEM
AMOUNT
177.15
100.00
55.00
14.72
336,65
315.55
112.86-
97,62
157.23
800.00
263.75
157.40
117.60
7.22
41
35.93
85.12
147.56
53.91
15.00
58.65
4,554.00
8,411.00
6,000.00
147.42
4.00
10.69
54.4~,
24.43
4.00
5.71
149.16
10.81
200.00
C. ECK
177.15
100.00
55.00
14.72
539.34
97.6Z -
157.23
800.00
58;
268.61
53.91
15.00
58.65
18,965.00
410.66
11.84
VOLICHRE2
12/7''''~
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
13215
13215
13215
13215
13216
13216
13216
13216
13216
13216
13216
13217
13218
13219
13220
132~z
13223
13224
13225
12:18
CHECK
DATE
12/29/93
12129193
12/29/93
12/29/93
12129193
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
12/29/93
VENDOR
NUMBER
001219
001219
001219
001219
001222
001222
001222
001222
001222
001222
001222
001247
001262
001263
001264
001265
001266
001267
001268
001269
CITY OF TENEOULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NAHE DESCRIPTION NUMBER
TEMECULA VALLEY LASER R LABOR PERFORMED
TEMEOULA VALLEY LASER R TAX
TEHECULA VALLEY LASER R OZONE FILTER
TEMECULA VALLEY LASER R TAX
320-199-999-5215
320-199-999-5215
320-199-999-5215
320-199-999-5215
ALPHA COlet~ICATIONS
ALPHA COMMUNICATIONS
ALPHA COIeeJNICATIONS
ALPHA COMMUNICATIONS
ALPHA COMHUNICATIONS
ALPHA COIIeJNICATIONS
ALPHA COMMUNICATIONS
RENTAL CREDIT
DEC PAGER RENTAL
DEC PAGER RENTAL
DEC PAGER RENTAL
DEC PAGER RENTAL
DEC PAGER RENTAL
DEC PAGER RENTAL
190-180-999-5238
190-180-999-5218
001-162-999-5238
320-199-999-5238
100-164-999-5238
001-170-999-5242
001-140-999-5250
CENTRAL NONITONING CORP NONITON SENIOR CENTER 190-181-999-5250
LAYLANDER, CHUCK
RODF[MG EVALUATION FOR 280-1700
HARVEY, SCOTT
TUITION REIMBURSEMENT 001-150-~99-5259
PRICE COSTCO
RENEWAL OF MEMBERSHIP 001-140-9~-5226
INTEGRATED DESIGN PRODU MAINTENANCE SPIRAL NACH 330-1~9-~-5242
AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOC AICP STUDY GUIDES
001-161-999-5261
DMV RENEWAL
REGISTRATION CITY HANAG 001-110-999-5Z26
PRINCETON ARCHITECTURAL THE NEXT AHERICAN METRO 001-161-99~-5228
LIEBERT, CASSIDY & FRIE SPECIAL SERVICES
001-150-999-5248
ITEN
ANOUNT
60.00
15.50
35.00
2.69
11.00-
99.00
33.00
11.00
62.3~
18.33
7.33
106.72
100.00
400.00
48.49
175.00
25.00
321.00
28.45
156.00
PAGE 7
CHECK
· AMOUNT
313.19
220.00
106.72
100.00
400.00
48.49
175.00
25.00
321. O0
28.45
156.00
TOTAL CHECKS
99,226.83
VOUCHRE2 PAGE
12/29/93 13:01 ~
CITY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
100 GAS TAX FUND
190 COII4UNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D
ZlO CAPITAL INPROVENENT PROJ FUND
250 CAPITAL PROJECTS - TCSD
280 REDEVELOPHENT AGENCY - CIP
300 INSURANCE FUND
320 INFORMATION SYSTENS
330 COPY CENTER FUND
TOTAL
ANOUNT
419,531.30
59,633.40
21,701.32
475.00
20,864..~
674,605.80
?..38,275.63
191,682.00
1,170.00
8,220.24
1,~05.03
1,&41,Z50.&&
VOUCHRE2
12/7''~ 13:01
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR
NUNBER DATE NUffiiER NANE
ITEH ACCOUNT
DESCRIPTION NUNBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
tJ~OUNT
13229 01/11/94 000107 ALHAMBRA GROUP
13229 01/11/94 000107' ALHNIRA GROUP
CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 100-164-999-5248
LONA LINDA PARK IMPROVE 210-190-134-5802
90.00
4,220.00
4,310.00
13230 01/11/94 000123
13230 01/11/94 000123
13230 01/11/94 000123
13230 01/11/94 000123
13230 01/11/94 000123
13230 01/11/94 000123
13230 01/11/94 000123
BURKE WILLJAMS & SORENS
BURKE WZLLIANS & SOltENS
BURKE WZLL/AMS & SORENS
BURKE WILLIAHS & SO!tENS
BURKE WILLIANS & SO!tENS
BURKE WZLLZAMS & SORENS
BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENS
LEGAL SERVICES/OCT. 93
LEGAL SERVICES/NOV.
LEGAL SERVICES/NOV.
LEGAL SERVICES/NOV,
LEGAL SERVICES/NOV.
LEGAL SERVICES/NOV.
LEGAL NOV. 93 RDA
001-130-999-5246
001-130-999-52/.6
300-199-999-5207
001-1280
190-180-999-5246
001-130-999-5246
001-130-999-52~6
3,150.00
1,630.79
415.43
2,387.10
18,786.21
15,480.42
48,295.29
13231 01/11/94 000126
13231 01/11/94 000126
13231 01/11/94 000126
13231 01/11/94 000126
13231 01/11/94 000126
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE
INSTALLATION OF DRAINAG
INSTALLATION OF DRAIN L
ADD LANDSCAPE NAINTENAN
LANDSCAPE NAINT
MEDIANS SERVICE AREA
190-180-999-5250
190-180-999-5250
190-180-999-5250
190-180-999-5250
191-180-999-5415
2,687.55
3,811.00
175.00
4,048.66
475.00
11,197.21
13232 01/11/94 000131 CARL WARREN & cO.
13232 01/11/94 000131 CARL WARREN & CO.
13232 01/11/94 000131 CARL WARREN & CO.
13232 01/11/94 000131 CARL WARREN & CO.
1:~ 01/11/94 000131 CARL WARREN & CO.
1: 01/11/94 000131 CARL WARREN & CO.
132~ 01/11/94 000131 CARL WARREN & CO.
13232 01/11/94 000131 CARL WARREN & CO.
13232 01/11/94 000131 CARL WARREN & CO.
13232 01/11/94 000131 CARL WARREN & CO.
MILLER, CHARLES & SHARO
SOUTHERN CAL EDISON
SOUTHERN CAL EDISON
KENNINGTON, JAMES H.
NORALES-GARC1A
STRAIGHT LINE GLASS
MARY COX *LOSS 8/24/92
HORALES*LOSS 07107193
AMNONS* LOSS 7106193
BOHORQUEZ *LOSS 7/10/f3
300-199-999-5205
300-199-999-5205
300-199-999-5205
300-199-999-5205
300-199-999-5205
300-199-999-5205
300-199-999-5205
300-199-999-5205
300-199-999-5205
300-199-999-5205
196.13
236.75
253.75
174.13
225.38
151.13
68.13
22.75
63.13
157.88
1,549.16
13233 01/11/94 000153 CR&R INCORPORATED
WASTE/RECYCLING 7/93-12 194-180-999-5315
674,605.80 674,605.80
13234 01/11/94 000164 ESGIL CORPORATION
PLAN CHECK FOR NOV 1~3 001-162-999-5248
4,447.63 4,447.6,5
13235 01/11/94 000178
13235 01/11/94 000178
13235 01/11/94 000178
13235 01/11/94 000178
GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO
GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO
GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO
GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO
HP DRAFTPRO PLUS PEN PL 320-1970
TAX 320-1970
4860X-66 VESA W/SNB RAM 320-1970
TAX 320-1970
3,939.00
305.27
3,690.00
285.97
8,220.24
13236 01/11/94 000202 J.F. DAVIDSON
13236 01/11/94 000202 J.F. DAVIDSON
Professionat surveying 210-165-630-5804
DESIGN SERVICES FOR RAN 210-190-137-5802
1,765.00
3,900.00
5,665.00
13237 01/11/94 000220
13237 01/11/94 000220
13237 01/11/94 000220
13237 01/11/94 000220
13237 01/11/94 000220
13238 01/11/94 000267
13239 01/11/94 000269
13239 01/11/94 000269
lY"" 01/11/94 000269
NAURICE PRINTERS QUICK
NAURICE PRINTERS QUICK
NAURICE PRINTERS QUICK
NAURICE PRINTERS QUICK
NAURICE PRINTERS QUICK
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE D
RIVERSIDE OFFICE SUPPLY
RIVERSIDE OFFICE SUPPLY
RIVERSIDE OFFICE SUPPLY
DIVIDERS FOR ANNUAL REP
COVER & BACK ANNUAL REP
BLANK PAPER FOR ANNUAL
BLACK COMB BINDERS
TAX
001-140-999-5222
001-140-999-5222
001-140-999-5222
001-140-999-5222
001-140-999-5222
JULY 1-SEPTEMBER 30 001-171-~-5251
COPIER/LASER PRINTER PA 330-199-999-5220
TAX 330-199-999-5220
COPIER/LASER PRINTER PA 330-199-999-5220
1,003.15
1,396.44
424.00
36.00
36.37
538.00
41.70
1,230.00
2,895.96
55,544.92
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TENECULA
12/29/93 13:01 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOB ALL PERIOOS
PAGE 2
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOB VENDOR ITEM
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION
13239 01/11/94 000269 RIVERSIDE OFFICE SUPPLY TAX
13240 01/11/94 000271 ROBERT BE]N, kl4 FROST & DESIGN OF NARGAR]TA RD.
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
330-199-999-5220
210-165-606-5802
ITEM
AMOUNT
95.33
2,246.59
CHECK
AMOUNT
1,905
2,246.59
13241 01/11/94 000310 TENECULA CREEK INN MEETING/DD 001-110-999-5260
13241 01/11/94 000310 TENECULA CREEK INN MEET[NG/SN 190-180~999-5260
13241 01/11/94 000310 TEMECULA CREEK INN CCleqlSSIONERS DINNER 001-100-999-5265
59.53
4&.91
2,273;00
Z,379.44
13242 01/11/94 000332
13242 01/11/94 000332
13243 01/11/94 000357
VANDORPE CHOU ASSOCIATI
VANDOBPE CHOU ASSOCIATI
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANS.
ADDITIONAL PLAN CHECK F
PLAN CHECK NOV. 1~3
FY 93-94 TRAFFIC SIGNAL
001-162-~9-5248
001-162-~-5248
100-164-~-5405
959.53
493 ~ ~
27,672.42
1,453.28
27,672.42
132/,4 01/11/94 000406 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF LAW ENFORCEMENT
13244 01/11/94 000/,06 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF LAW ENFOBCEMENT
13244 01/11/94 000~06 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF LAW ENFOBCENENT
13244 01/11/94 000406 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF LAW ENFONCEMENT
13244 01/11/94 000406 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF LAW ENFOBCENIENT
13244 01/11/94 000406 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF LAW ENFOBCEMENT
13244 01/11/94 000~06 RIVERSIDE COUNTY $HERIF LAW ENFOBCEMENT
13244 01/11/94 000~06 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHER[F LAW ENFOBCEMENT
13244 01/11/94 000406 RIVERSIDE COUNTY $HERIF LAW ENFOBCEMENT
fOOT 199 001-170-999-5288
[OCT 199 001-170-999-5299
/OCT 199 001-170-999-5298
~OOT 199 001-170-999-5290
/OCT 199 001-1230
/OOT 199 001-170-999-5291
fOOt 199 001-170-999-5281
fOOt 199 001-170-999-5282
/OOT 199 001-170-999-5262
207,882.55
15,981.17
17,827.60
5,838.40
5,546.48
5,546.48
18,054,09
2,722.32
15,978,90
295,377
13245 01/11/94 000481 GEOTECHN/CAL & ENVIRONM PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICA 280-199-805-5802
1,170~00
1,170.Uu
13246 01/11/94 000508 SAFEGUARD BUSINESS SYST CHECKS 001-140-999-5222
13246 01/11/94 000508 SAFEGUARD BUSINESS SYST LASER CHECKS 001-140-999-5222
13247 01/11/94 000678 RIVERSIDE COUNTY HEALTH ANIMAL CONTROL/OCTOBER 001-172-999-5255
13248 01/11/94 000689 CANPBELL'S LIGHTING SIG REPLACE TRANSFOBMERS 190-180-999-5212
13248 01/11/94 000689 CAMPBELL'S LIGHTING SIG MOVE & REPAIR CONDUIT 190-180-999-5212
15249 01/11/94 000712 FOBD, STEVEN J. Amendmnt No. 1 to Purc 250-190-129-5804
13249 01/11/94 000712 FORO, STEVEN J. NOV CRC FEES 250-190-129-5804
13250 01/11/94 000754 ELLIOTT GROUP, THE PLAN CHECK & REVIEWS 190-180-999-5250
13250 01/11/94 000754 ELLIOTT GROUP, THE LDSP PLAN CK & REVIEWS 193-180-999-5250
13250 01/11/94 000754 ELLIOTT GROUP, THE LANOSCAPE REVIEW 001-161-999-5250
13250 01/11/94 000754 ELLIOTT GROUP, THE PROVIOE UPOATE LOSP STA 193-180-999-5250
13250 01/11/94 000754 ELLIOTT GROUP, THE AMOUNT INCOBRECTLY INVO 193-180-999-5250
1,214.03
84.28
5,764,91
249.27
1,229.83
5,280.00
480.00
900.00
225,00
1,750,00
800.00
200.00-
13251 01/11/94 000818 SIGNAL MAINTENANCE, INC RETENTION 210-2035 12,670.75
13252 01/11/94 000820 WINCHAK, KRIS NAP PLAN CHECK & LEGAL 001-163-999-5249
13252 01/11/94 000820 WINCHAK, KRIS CREDIT WORKERS CONP PRE 001-1182
13253 01/11/94 000845 NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITI MEMBERSHIP THRU FEB 95 001-100-999-5226
13254 01/11/94 000881 OAKRIDGE LANDSCAPE/IRRI VIA LOBO LANDSCAPE 100-164-999-5401
2,250.00
151.63-
2,290.00
5,369.00
1,298.31
5,764.91
1,47~.10
5,760.00
3,475.00
12,670.75
2,098.37
2,290.00
5,369J3~
VOUCHRE2 PAGE 3
12/7""" 13:01
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
13255
13255
13255
13256
13256
13257
13257
13258
13258
13258
13259
13259
13259
13259
13259
13259
13259
1:
132..,y
13259
13259
13260
13261
13261
13261
13262
13262
13262
13262
13263
1326~
1326~
CHECK
DATE
01/11/94
01/11/94
01/11/94
01/11/94
01/11/94
01/11/94
01/11/94
01/11/94
01/11/94
01/11/94
01/11/94
01/11/94
01/11/94
01/11/94
01/11/94
01/11/94
01/11/94
01/11/94
01/11/94
01/11/94
01/11/94'
01/11/94
01/11/94
01/11/94
01/11/94
01/11/94
01/11/94
01/11/94
01/11/94
01/11/94
01/11/94
01/11/94
01/11/94
VENDOR
NUMBER
00088~
00088~
00088~
000929
000929
000979
000979
001007
001007
001007
001056
001056
001056
001056
001056
001056
001056
001056
001056
001056
001056
001056
001058
001124
001124
001124
001132
001132
001132
001132
001191
001231
001231
VENDOR
NAME
MONTELEONE EXCAVATING
MONTELEONE EXCAVATING
MONTELEONE EXCAVATING
T.B. PENICK
T.B. PENICK
DEL RIO ENTERPRISE
DEL RIO ENTERPRISE
NPG CORP.
NPG CORP.
NPG CORP.
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANOSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
ACCURATE LANDSCAPE
CUNNINGHAM-DAVIS CORP.
CUNNINGHAM-DAVIS CORP.
CUNNINGHAM-DAVIS CORP.
ACCURATE CONSTRUCTION,
ACCURATE CONSTRUCTION,
ACCURATE CONSTRUCTION,
ACCURATE CONSTRUCTION,
C & C GRADING & PAVING
AZTEC TECHNOLOGY CORP.
AZTEC TECHNOLOGY CORP.
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERZOOS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
WORK ORDER NO. 93-94-81
28841VALLEJO CONSTRUCT
JOHN UARNER RD
CRC CONSTRUCT]ON
TB PEN]CK RETENT]ON
EMERGENCY P.O. FOR HAZ-
la3RK ORDER #93-94-79
gORK ORDER #93-94-72
EXTRA WORK FOR PO #1476
PAUBA RD CURB
SLOPE AREA A NAINTENANC
NOV LANDSCAPE NAINTENAN
IRRIGATION CONTROLLER R
TRZN (18) EUCALYPTUS/LO
LABOR TO REPAIR 2n FEBC
MATERIAL (REPAIR KIT) V
LABOR AND MATERIAL TO I
LABOR AND MATERIAL TO R
PREP SLOPE AND PLANT SH
PROVIDE LABOR TO TRIM C
PROVIDE LABOR TO REPAIR
DEC. LANDSCAPE MAINT.
DEC. MAINTENANCE
PROVIDE LABOR~ MATERIAL
RIVERTON PARK
RETENTION
STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENT
STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENT
ACCURATE CONST RETENTIO
I:q,193-01 JEFFERSON AVE S
I, N3RK ORDER NO. 93-94-83
20~X40' STEEL CARGO CON
TAX
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
100-16~-999-5402
100-164-999-5401
100-164-999-5401
250-190-129-5804
250-2035
100-164-999-5430
100-164-999-5402
100-164-999-5402
100-164-999-5402
100-164-999-5402
193-180-999-5415
193-180-999-5415
193-180-999-5415
193-180-999-5415
193-180-999-5415
193-180-999-5415
19~-180-999-5415
193-180-999-5415
193-180-999-5415
193-180-999-5415
193-180-999-5415
193-180-999-5415
190-180-999-5250
210-190-131-5804
210-190-131-5804
210-2035
210-165-630-5804
210-165-630-580~
210-2035
210-165-630-5804
100-164-999-5402
100-164-999-5610
100-164-999-5610
ITEM
AMOUNT
2,300.00
400.00
890.00
206,580.00
20,658.00'
1,921.88
5,800.00
3,075.00
T52.00
430,00
1,073.75
4,295.00
125.00
1,350.00
75.00
45.00
300.00
420.00
520.00
150.00
384.00
11,302.24
6,172.00
163,929.74
7,870.26
17,180.00-
4,300.00
8.00
6,539.26-
61,084.55
8,049.24
2,695.00
208.86
CHECK
AMOUNT
3,590.00
185,922.00
7,721.88
4,237.00
20,039.99
6,172.00
154,620.00
58,853.29
8,13/,9.24
2,903.86
TOTAL CHECKS
1,641,250.66
ITEM
NO.
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
/
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: Mary Jane McLarney, Finance Officer
DATE: January 11, 1994
SUBJECT: City Treasurer's Report as of October 31, 1993
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive and file the City Treasurer's
report as of October 31, 1993.
DISCUSSION: Reports to the City Council regarding the City's investment
portfolio and receipts, disbursemen~ and fund balance are required by Government
Code Sections 53646 and 41004 respectively. The City's investment portfolio is in
compliance with the Code Sections as of October 31, 1993.
FISCAL IMPACT:
ATTACHMENTS:
Norle
1. City Treasurer's Report as of October 31, 1993
2. Schedule of Fund Balances as of October 31, 1993
City of Temecula
City Treasurer's Report
As of October 31, 1993
Cash Activity for the Month of October:
Cash and Investments as of October 1, 1993
Cash Receipts
Cash Disbursements
Cash and Investments as of October 31, 1993
41,131,409
1,437,579
(1,601,235)
40,967,753
Cash and Investments Portfolio:
Type of Investment
Petty Cash
General Checking
Benefit Demand Deposits
Local Agency Investment Fund
Deferred Compensation Fund
Deferred Compensation Fund
Defined Contribution Fund
Trust Accounts-TCSD Bonds
Trust Accounts-RDA Bonds
Institution
City Hall
First Interstate
First Interstate
State Treasurer
ICMA
PEBSCO
PEBSCO
Bank of Amedca
Bank of America
Yield
4.380%
2.704%
2.704%
Balance
800
25,275
4, 179
18,874,952
281,407
132,795
15,208
4,364,550
17,268,587
'40,967,753
(1)
(1)
(1)-This amount is net of outstanding checks.
Per Govemment Code Requirements, this Treasurer's Report is in compliance with
the City of Temecula's investment policy and there are adequate funds available
to meet budgeted and actual expenditures of the City of Temecula for the next
thirly days.
Prepared by Tim McDermott, Senior Accountant
City of Temecula
Schedule of Fund Balances
As of October 31, 1993
Total Assets $
Less: Liabilities
Total Fund Balances
Less: Reserved Amounts (1)
Less: Designated Amounts (2)
Unreserved, Undesignated
Fund Balances $
Community
Services Redevelopment
City District Agency
24,255,962 $ 2,876,427 $ 22,717,506
5,643,843 1,342,732 2,960,770
18,61 2, 119 1,533,695 19,756,736
2,632,603 1,533,695 5,080,089
10,431,908 14,676,647
5,647,608 $ 0 $ 0 $
Total
49,649,895
9,947,345
39,902,550
9,246,387
25,108,555
5,547,608
(1) Includes amounts reserved for encumbrances, land held for resale, long-term notes receivable, low/rood housing,
and debt service.
(2) Includes amounts designated for economic uncertainty, debt service, and continuing appropriations.
ITEM
5
CITY MANAGER ~
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: Mary Jane McLarney, Finance Officer
DATE: January 11, 1994
SUBJECT: City Treasurer's Report as of November 30, 1993
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive and file the City Treasurer's
report as of November 30, 1993.
DISCUSSION: Reports to the City Council regarding the City's investment
portfolio and receipts, disbursements and fund balance are required by Government
Code Sections 53646 and 41004 respectively. The City's investment portfolio is in
compliance with the Code Sections as of November 30, 1993.
FISCAL IMPACT: None
ATTACHMENTS: 1. City Treasurer's Report as of November 30, 1993
2. Schedule of Fund Balances as of November 30, 1993
City of Temecula
City Treasurer's Report
As of November 30, 1998
Cash Activity for the Month of November:
Cash and Investments as of November 1, 1993
Cash Receipts
Cash Disbursements
Cash and Investments as of November 30, 1998
$
$
40,967,753
1,575,572
(2,220,359)
40,322,966
Cash and Investments Portfolio:
Type of Investment
Petty Cash
General Checking
Benefit Demand Deposits
Local Agency Investment Fund
Deferred Compensation Fund
Deferred Compensation Fund
Defined Contribution Fund
Trust Accounts-TCSD Bonds
Trust Accounts-RDA Bonds
Institution
City Hall
First Interstate
First Interstate
State Treasurer
ICMA
PEBSCO
PEBSCO
Bank of America
Bank of America
Yield
4.365%
2.732%
2.732%
Balance
800
130, 107
4,876
18,074,953
281,407
132,795
15,208
4,374,573
17,308,247
40,322,966
(1)
(1)
(1)-This amount is net of outstanding checks.
Per Government Code Requirements, this Treasurer's Report is in compliance with
the City of Temecula's investment policy and there are adequate funds available
to meet budgeted and actual expenditures of the City of Temecula for the next
thirty days.
Prepared by Tim McDermott, Senior Accountant
City of Temecula
SChedule of Fund Balances
As of November 30, 1993
Total Assets $
Less: Liabilities
Total Fund Balances
Less: Reserved Amounts (1)
Less: Designated Amounts (2)
Unreserved, Undesignated
Fund Balances $
Commurljty
Services Redevelopment
City District Agency
24,256, 125 $ 2,347, 91 6 $ 22,761,179
5,790,988 1,189,306 3,001,705
18,465, 137 1,158,61 0 19,759,474
5,586,939 1,158,61 0 5,085,376
7,535,399 14,674,093
5,342,798 .$ 0 $ 0 $
Total
49,365,220
9,981,999
39,383,221
11,830,925
22,209,497
5,342,798
(1) Includes amounts reserved for encumbrances, land held for resale, long-term notes receivable, Iow/mod housing,
and debt service.
(2) Includes amounts designated for economic uncertainty, debt service, and continuing appropriations.
ITEM NO.
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAl
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Tim D. Sarlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
January 11, 1994
"No Parking" Zone on Ynez Road from Rancho California Road to
Rancho Highland Drive
PREPARED BY:
Martin C. Lauber, Traffic Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
The Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution
entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 94-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ESTABLISHING "NO PARKING" ZONE ON YNEZ
ROAD FROM RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD TO RANCHO
HIGHLAND DRIVE
BACKGROUND:
The Traffic Engineering Division has prepared a Striping Plan for Ynez Road south of Rancho
California Road to accommodate the road reconfigurations constructed during the recent Ynez
Road improvement project. The Ynez Road improvements have provided for two (2) through
lanes southbound at the intersection with Rancho California Road. In order to properly
transition traffic to one (1) lane south of the Rancho California Road intersection, the
appropriate taper would preclude parking, which staff feels is appropriate.
FISCAL IMPACT
FY 93-94: Funds are available in the Department of Public Works Striping/Stenciling
Account No. 100-164-999-5410.
600 feet of red curb ~ 60.581L.F. = ~348.00
Attachment:
Resolution No. 94-
Exhibit "A"
-1- pwOS%egd~t~94%0111%011 lbJeu
RESOLUTION NO. 94- ,_~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF T~IECULA F.~TABTJ~H/NG "NO PARKING' ZONE
ON YNEZ ROAD FROM RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD TO
RANCHO HIGm~AND DRIVE
The City Council of the City of Temecula does resolve, determine and order as follows:
Secilon 1. Pursuant to Section 12.08.216ofOrdinanceNo. 91-16, which the City has
adopted by reference, the following *No Parking* zone is hereby established in the City of
Temecula:
'No Parking' on both sides of Ynez Road from Rancho California Road
to Rancho Highland Drive as shown on Exhibit 'A '.
Section 2.
The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this
Re,~lution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPT!~, by the City Council of the City of Temecula
at a regular meeting held on the llth day of January, 1994.
Ronald H. Robens, Mayor
A~rEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
-2- pwOS~egdrpt%94%0111%011 lb.leu
YNEZ
II
ROAD
RANCHO
CALIFORNIA
ROAD
-- -- - -- RED CURB
RANClIO HIGHLAND DRIVE
i
I
No
EXHIBIT "A"
ITEM
NO.
7
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL ~R~.
CITY ATTORNEY /c-
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
January 11, 1994
Ordinance 94- Prima Facie Speed Limits on Certain Streets
PREPARED BY: Martin C. Lauber, Traffic Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
entitled:
That the City Council introduce and read by title only an ordinance
ORDINANCE 94-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, AMENDING SECTION 10.28 OF THE TEMECULA
MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS ON
CERTAIN STREETS
BACKGROUND:
Margarita Road was recently improved from Winchester Road south to Solana Way. Staff
conducted a Traffic and Engineering Survey for Speed Zoning, as required by the California
Vehicle Code, to determine if the existing maximum speed limit is reasonable. Staff found the
critical speed (85th percentile) varied from 50 mph to 53 mph at three locations along this
corridor.
The critical speed is that speed at or below which 85 percent of the traffic is moving. Speed
limits should be established preferably at or near the critical speed. The establishment of a
speed limit of more than five (5) miles per hour below the 85th percentlie speed should be
done with great care considering prevailing speeds, accident records, and those highway
traffic and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver.
This portion of Margarita Road is partially improved, without concrete curbs, gutters,
sidewalks, and street lights. In addition, the roadway follows a curvilinear alignment with
some unexpected driveway locations near Solana Way where the existing vertical curve do
not provide sufficient sight distance to support the critical speed. Due to these unusual
conditions, not readily apparent to the motorist, staff recommends a posted speed of 45 mph.
Onis Ol -1-
FISCAL IMPACT:
Install four (4) "45 Miles Per Hour" signs (4 @ $125 each) = $500
ATTACHMENTS:
Ordinance 94-
Ods 01 -2-
ORDINANCE NO. 94-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA, AMENDING SECTION 10.28 OF THE
TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING PRIMA
FACIE SI'Em~B LIMITS ON CERTAIN STREETS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN
AS FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, The City of Temecula finds and determines that from time to time it is
necessary to add or modify existing prima facie sr, ccd limits within the City for certain streets,
or pans of streets.
SECTION 1. Section 10.28.010(d) of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended
to add the following streets:
*Nsune of Street nnd
Portion Affected
Declared Prima
Facie Speed Limit.
Miles Per Hour
Margarita Road - Winchester Road to
Solaria Way
SECTION 2. Severability. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this
Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any
sentence, paragraph, or section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the
validity of the remaining pans of this Ordinance.
SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall
cause the same to be posted as required by hw.
SECTION 4. l~.ffecfive r~te. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30)
days after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause
copies of this Ordinance to be posted in three designated posting places.
SECTION S. The City Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance and a certified
copy of the full text of this Ordinance shall be posted in the office of the City Clerk at least five
days prior to the adoption of this Ordinance. Within 15 days from adoption of this Ordinance,
the City Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance, together with the names of the
Councilmembers voting for and against the Ordinance, and post the same in the office of the
City Clerk.
Oeis 01
PASSED AlPROVED.AND ADOPTED this day of ,1994.
Ronald H. Roberts, Mayor
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the forgoing
Ordinance No. 94- was dully introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular
meeting of the City Council on the day of , 1994, and that thereafter, said
Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regHlnr meeting of the City Council on the
day of , 1994, by the following vote:
0 CO~CILMEMBERS:
NOES:
0 CO~C~ERS:
ABSENT: 0 CO~CILlV~ERS:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
Ords 01
ITEM NO.
8
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAl
CITY ATTORNEY ~..~,~
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
January 11, 1994
All Way Stop, Pauba Road at Meadows Parkway
PREPARED BY:
Martin C. Lauber, Traffic Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 94-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ESTABLISHING "STOP SIGNS"
BACKGROUND:
Staff had been asked to analyze the possibility of adding two (2) stop signs on Pauba Road
at Meadows Parkway which would make it an ell-way stop.
The California Department of Transportation Traffic Manual identifies criteria along with three
(3) specific warrants for the consideration of multi-way stops. Although these three (3)
warrants are not met, other factors that may be considered include, sight distance, local travel
patterns and any other site specific impacts.
A field review revealed that northbound vehicles on Meadows Parkway, stopped at the stop
sign, have substandard visibility of vehicles approaching from the west on Pauba Road. This
limitation also exists for pedestrians crossing on their way home from school. Existing traffic
volumes entering on Pauba Road and Meadows Parkway are nearly balanced with a 45%-55%
split.
Based on limited visibility and the near balance of vehicles entering the intersection, staff
recommends two (2) additional stop signs for Pauba Road at Meadows Parkway.
pwOE~egdq~t~94~011 l~llwey.elle 0111
FISCAL IMPACT: ~_~
Two (2) stop ahead signs, at ~125.00 = $250.00
Two (2) stop signs, at ~125.00 each = ~250.00
Eight (8) legends at e24.00 = $192.00
Limit line - 30 LF. at 80.45 = ~13.50
Four (4) all-way signs, at $5.00 = e20.00
TOTAL $725.50
Funds are available in the Department of Public Works Signs Account Number 100-164-999-
NOTE:
All work to be done by City Maintenance Crews except pavement markings
which are awaiting new stencil truck.
Attachment:
Resolution No. 94-
pwO5%agdrpt~94~011 l~llway.ftp 0111
Section 2.
Resolution.
RESOLUTION NO. 94-
A RESOLUTION OF ~ CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TF_,MECULA ESTABLISHING "STOP" SIGNS
The City Counc~ of the City of Temecula does resolve, determine and order as follows:
Section 1. PtLrsuant to Section 10.12.100 of the Municipal Code, the following
"STOP" sign locations are hereby established in the City of Temecula.
A. Westbound Pauba Road (~ Meadows Parkway
B. Eastbound Pauba Road @ Meadows Parkway
The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this
PASSED, APPROVE!} AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula
at a regular meeting held on the llth day of January, 1994.
Ronald H. Roberrs, Mayor
ATTEST:
June S. Greek
City Clerk
[SEAL]
Re,o, 01
ITEM
NO.
APPROVAT.
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
Mary Jane McLarney, Finance Officer
January 11, 199~
Authorization To Execute Supplemental Agreement For The Use
of 19th Year Community Development Block Grant Funds
PREPARED BY: Luci Romero, Financial Services Administrator
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council authorize the Mayor to execute the
Supplemental Agreement for the 19th Year Community Development Block Grant
Funds.
DISCUSSION: On March 23, 1993, the City Council approved the 19th year
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) fund projects. The U.S. Department of
Housing Urban Development (HUD) provides CDBG funding for local projects which
meet at least one of the following nationally established goals:
Low/moderate income persons are primarily benefitted by the activity; or
The activity aids in the prevention or elimination of slums or blight; or
The activity meets an urgent (emergency) community development need.
The City's 1993-94 approved projects are as follows:
Alternatives to Domestic Violence .
Sam Hick Park Handicapped Access Improvements
Operation School Bell
Pujoi Street Improvements
10,000
30,000
10-_O()0
22,660
Execution of the CDBG 19th Year Supplemental Agreement facilitates CDBG funding
for the above projects.
FISCAL IMPACT: None.
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
12
13
14
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
File: 1.TM001, 012, 014, 1,053
SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT FOR THE USE OF
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE of the State of California, herein
called, "COUNTY," and the City of Temecula, herein called "CITY,"
mutually agree as follows:
1. GENERAL. COUNTY and CITY have executed a Cooperation
Agreement dated August 28, 1990, whereby CITY elected to
participate with COUNTY, which has qualified as an ".Urban County"
for purposes of receiving Community Development Block Grant (CDBG)
funds, and to assist and undertake essential community development
and housing assistance activities pursuant to the Housing and
Community Development Act of 1974, as amended, hereinafter referred
to as "Act". Said Cooperation Agreement dated August 28, 1990, is
incorporated herein by reference and made a part of this Agreement
as if each and'every provision was set forth herein.
2. PURPOSE. CITY promises and agrees to undertake and
assist with the community development activities, within its
jurisdiction, by utilizing the sum of $172,660, CDBG Entitlement
Funds, as specifically identified in Exhibits "A," "B," "C," and
"D," respectively, which are attached hereto and by this reference
are incorporated herein, for the.projects:
Alternatives to Domestic Violence $10,000
Sam Hicks Park Handicapped Access Improvements $30,000
Operation School Bell $10,000
Pujol Street Improvements $122,660.
CITY shall obtain COUNTY's approval, through the Economic
Development Agency, of the projects plans and specifications prior
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
to CITY's construction of same. CITY promises and agrees to
utilize and maintain the projects for a minimum period of five (5)
years or the life of the project, whichever is less.
3. TERM OF AGREEMENT. This Agreement shall become
effective upon execution and shall continue in full force and
effect for a period of one (1) year from July 1, 1993 to June 30°
1994, and proceed consistent with the completion schedule set forth
in Exhibits "A," "B," "C," and "D." If substantial compliance with
the completion schedule, due to unforeseen or uncontrollable
circumstances, cannot be met by CITY, the schedule for the projects
may be extended. If substantial progress toward completion, as
determined by COUNTY, of the projects is not made during the term
of the Supplemental Agreement, the entitlement funds associated
with the projects may be reprogrammed by COUNTY after appropriate
notice is given CITY.
4. DISPOSITION OF FUNDS. COUNTY's Board of Supervisors
shall determine the final disposition and distribution of all funds
received by COUNTY under the Act consistent with the provisions of
Paragraphs 2 and 3 of this Agreement. COUNTY, through its Economic
Development Agency, shall:
(1) make payment of the grant funds to CITY as
designated in Exhibits "A," "B," "C," and "D," and (2)'monitor the
project activity to ensure compliance with, applicable federal
regulations and the terms of this Agreement. CITY shall comply
with timely drawdown of funds by submitting monthly requests for
reimbursement. All disbursements of grant funds will be on a
reimbursement basis and made within thirty (30) days after the CITY
has submitted its letter identifying payments made and requesting
2
1~ reimbursement.
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
5. COOPERATION WITH HOUSING ASSISTANCE ACTIVITIES. CITY
shall cooperate with COUNTY in undertaking essential community
development and housing assistance activities, specifically urban
renewal and public assistance housing, and shall assist COUNTY in
carrying out its housing assistance plans, Comprehensive Housing
Affordability Strategy, and other requirements of the Community
Development Block Grant Program.
CDBG Housing Plan.
6. LEAD AGENCY FOR
CITY shall adhere to the COUNTY
COMPLIANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL OUALITY ACT (CEOA]. Pursuant to Section 15051(d) of
Title 14 of the California Administrative Code, CITY is designated
as the lead agency for the projects that are the subject matter of.
this Agreement.
7. HOLD HARMLESS AND INDEMNIFICATION. CITY shall comply
16 with all applicable laws, rules and regulations, and shall
17 indemnify, save'and hold harmless COUNTY and its agency members and
18 their respective agents, servants and employees of and from any and
19 all liabilities, claims, debt, damages, demands, suits, actions and
20 causes of action of whatsoever kind, nature or sort including, but
21 not by way of limitation, wrongful death, expenses of the defense
22 of said parties, and the payment of attorney's fees, arising out of
23 or in any manner connected with the performance by CITY under this
24 Agreement.
25 8. RECORDS AND INSPECTIONS.
26 a. CITY shall establish and maintain records in
27 accordance with 24 C.F.R. Part 570 and Part 85 and OMB Circular A-
87 as applicable and as they relate to the acceptance and use of
3
1 federal funds under this Agreement.
2 b. CITY shall maintain a separate account for CDBG
3 Entitlement funds received as set forth in Exhibits "A," "B," "C,"
4 and "D."
5 c. CITY shall, during the normal business hours, make
6 available to COUNTY and to the Department of Housing and Urban
7 Development for examination and copying all of its records and
8 other materials with respect to matters covered by this Agreement.
9 ~"d. CITY shall not retain all program income as
10 defined in Section 570,500 of Title 24 of the Federal Code of
.11 Regulations.
12 9. FEDERAL REOUIREMENTS. CiTY shall comply with the
13 provisions of the Act and any amendments thereto and the federal
14 regulations and guidelines now or hereafter enacted pursuant to the
15 Act. More particularly, CITY is to comply with those regulations
16 found in Part 85 and Part 570 of Title 24 of the Code of Federal
17 Regulations. CiTY is to comply with OMB Circular A-87, or any
18 subsequent replacement. CITY is to abide by the provisions of the
19 Community Development Block Grant Manual, prepared by COUNTY and
20 cited in the above-mentioned Cooperation Agreement.
21 10. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. CITY and its agents, servants
22 and employees shall act ~t all times in an independent capacity
23 during the term of this Agreement, and shall not act as, shall not
24 be, nor shall they in any manner be construed to be agents,
25 officers or employees of the COUNTY.
26 11. TERMINATION.
27 a. CITY. CITY may not terminate this Agreement
28 except upon express written consent of COUNTY.
4
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
federal, state
rendering any
untenable; or
b. COUNTY. Notwithstanding the provisions of
Paragraph lla, COUNTY may suspend or terminate this Agreement upon
written notice to CITY of action being taken and the reason for
such action:
(1) In the event CITY fails to perform the
covenants herein contained at such times and in such manner as
provided in this Agreement; and
(2) In the event there is a conflict with any
or local law, ordinance, regulation or rule
of the provisions of this Agreement invalid or
(3) In the event the funding from the Department
of Housing and Urban Development referred to in Paragraphs 1 and 2
above is terminated or otherwise becomes unavailable.
c. Upon suspension of this Agreement, CITY agrees to
16 return.any unencumbered funds which it has been provided by COUNTY.
17 In accepting said funds, COUNTY does not waive any claim or cause
18 of action it may have against CITY for breach of this Agreement.
19 d. Upon suspension of this Agreement, CITY agrees not
20 to incur any additional cost with regard to the projects that are
21 cited in the written notice as necessitating the suspensions.
22 12. NONDISCRIMINATION. CITY shall abide by Sections
23 570,601 and 570,602 of Title 24 of the Federal Code of Regulations
24 which requires that no person in the United States shall on the
25 grounds of race, color, national origin, or sex, be excluded from
26 participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to
27 discrimination under any program or activity funded in whole or in
part with Community Development funds.
5
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
13. PROHIBITION AGAINST CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
a. CITY and its assigns, employees, agents,
consultants, officers and elected and appointed officials shall
become familiar with and shall comply with the CDBG regulations
prohibiting conflicts of interest contained in 24 CFR 570.611,
attached hereto as Exhibit "C__I" and by'this reference incorporated
herein.
b. CITY and its assigns, employees, agents,
consultants,'officers, and elected and appointed officials shall
become familiar with and shall comply with Section A-11 of the
County's CDBG Policy manual, attached hereto as Exhibit "C__I" and by
this reference incorporated herein.
c. CITY understands and agrees that no waiver of
exception can be granted to the prohibition against conflict of
interest except upon written approval of HUD pursuant to 24 CFR
570,611 (d). Any request by CITY for an exception shall first be
reviewed by COUNTY to determine whether such request is appropriate
for submission to HUD. In determining whether such request is
appropriate for submission to HUD, COUNTY will consider the factors
listed in 24 CFR 570,611 (e).
d. Prior to any funding under this Agreement, CITY
shall provide COUNTY with a list of all employees, agents,
consultants, officers and elected and appointed officials who
are in a position to participate in a decision making process,
exercise any functions or responsibilities, or gain inside
information with respect to the CDBG activities funded under
this Agreement. CITY shall also promptly disclose to COUNTY any
potential conflict, including even the appearance of conflict,
6
1 that may arise with respect to the CDBG activities funded under
this Agreement.
3 e. Any violation of this section shall be deemed a
4 material breach of this Agreement, and the Agreement shall be
5 immediately terminated by the COUNTY.
6 14. PROJECT ELIGIBILITY. As to CITY or its claimants,
7 COUNTY shall bear no liability for any later determination by the
8 United States Government, the Department of Housing and Urban
9 Development or any other person or entity that CITY.is'or is not
10 eligible under 24 C.F.R. Part 570 to receive CDBG funds.
11 15. EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES TO BE CAUSED BY PROJECT. City
12 agrees to require and to require any lessee or assignee to notify
13 Riverside County JTPD (Jobs Training Partnerships Department) and
14 GAIN - Department of Public Social Services of any and all job
openings that are caused by this project.
16 16. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. It is expressly agreed that this
17 Agreement embodies the entire agreement of the parties in relation
18 to the subject matter thereof, and that no other Agreement or
19 understanding, verbal or otherwise, relative to this subject
20 matter, exists between the parties at the time of execution.
21 17. MINISTERIAL ACTS. The Director of the COUNTY's
22 Economic Development Agency or his or her designee(s) are
23 authorized to take such ministerial actions as may be necessary or
24 appropriate to implement the terms, provisions, and conditions of
25 this Agreement as it may be amended from time to time by COUNTY.
26
27
1 18. MODIFICATION OF AGREEMENT. This Agreement may be
2 modifiedor amended only by a writing signed by the duly authorized
3 and empowered representative of COUNTY and CITY respectively.
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24.
25
26
27
28
DATED:
ATTEST:
GERALD A. MALONEY
Clerk of the Board
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
.By:
Chairman, Board of'Supervisors
By:
Deputy
(Seal)
DATED:
ATTEST:
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
City Clerk
By:
Mayor
8
EXHIBIT A FILE: 0. 102
Page 1
SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT
Cock .fative Agency: Alternatives to Domestic Violence
Address: P.O. Box 910, Riverside, CA 92502
Project Title: Alternatives to Domestic Violence
Location: Western Riverside County
Description: This agency serves battered spouses who are victims of domestic
violence. CDBG funds will be utilized to offset costs a~sociated with the
operation and administration of the agency's toll free crisis line, three
regional outreach centers which provide advocacy and counseling services,
emergency food, clothing and shelter as well as community education
presentations.
This project serves limited clientele; therefore, the attached document for
Direct Benefits needs to be filled out and submitted to the County of Riverside
EDA on a monthly basis. Should there be no services rendered, submit a form
indicating NO SERVICE.
Pro/iect Budget:
Cost
CDBG ADDroved
1) Architect/Engineer Design Costs $
2) Administration Costs
75,865 10,000
3) Planning Costs
4) Acquisition Costs
5) Construction Costs
6) Relocation Costs
7) Equipment Costs
8) Other Costs
9) Operation/Maintenance
10) Contingency
TOTAL $ 75,865 $ 10,000'
,Note: This project is being administered on behalf of the City of Temecula by
theCounty of Riverside. See Countywide Sponsor's Agreement between the County
ar lternatives to Domestic Violence governingthe expenditure of these 19th year
CDb~ funds (File #0.102).
EXHIBIT B
Page 1
FILE:
1.TM012
SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT
Cooperative Agency: City of Temecula - Community Services District
Address: 43174 Business Park Dr., Temecula, CA 92590
Project Title: Sam Hicks Park Handicapped Access Improvements
Location: Mercedes and Moreno St.. Temecula0 CA
Description: The City of Temecula plans to utilize CDBG funds to construct park
improvements designed to-remove architectural barriers for handicapped persons at
Sam Hicks Park. These improvements will include the installation of interior
sidewalks, play area curbing, handicapped picnic tables, handicapped drinking
fountain and a safe-play resilient surface in the tot lot play equipment area.
The proposed modifications will assist the City of Temecula in complying with ADA
requirements.
Project Budget:
Cost
CDBG ADDroved
1) Architect/Engineer Design Costs $
2) Administration Costs
3) Planning Costs
4) Acquisition Costs
5) Construction Costs
6) Relocation Costs
7) Equipment Costs
8)-Other Costs
9) Operation/Maintenance
10) Contingency
TOTAL $
30,000 30,000
30°000 $ 30,000
EXHIBIT B
Page 2
FILE:
1. TM0 12
Tim, ~ble Implementation Schedule
Milestone
Prepare Plans, Specifications
and Bid Documents
Advertise for Bid
Award Contract
Notice to Proceed
Construction
Start Date
11/01/93
02/15/94
04/01/94
04/15/94
05/01/94
Completion Date
02/01/9'4
03/15/94
04/01/94
06/~0/94
EXHIBIT B
Page 3
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
ANNUAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
PROJECT SUMMARY
PERIOD OF APPLICABILITY
TO
1. NAME OF APPLICANT
County of Riverside
2. APPLICATION/GRANT NUMBER
B-93-UC-06-0506
x Original (each year)
.Revision, Date
Amendment, Date
FROM
July 1, 1993
5. NAME OF PROJECT
Sam Hicks Park Handicapped
Access Improvements
8. ENTITY WITH RESPONSIBILITY FOR CARRYING OUT THE PROJECT
City of Temecula Community Services District
June 30° 1994
6. PROJECT NUMBER 7. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW STATdS
1.TM012 Categorically Excluded
9. TELEPHONE NUMBER
(909) 694-6480
10. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
The City of Temecula plans to utilize CDBG funds. to construct park
improvements designed to remove architectural barriers for handicapped persons at
Sam Hicks Park. These improvements will include the installation of interior
sidewalks, play area curbing, handicapped picnic tables, handicapped drinking
fountain and a safe-play resilient surface in the tot lot play equipment area.
The proposed modifications will assist the City of Temecula in complying with ADA
requirements.
ELIGIBILITY: 570.201(k)
BENEFIT: 570.208(a)(2)
Check if continued on additional page(s) and attach.
11. CENSUS TRACT(S)/ENUMERATION DISTRICT(S)
Presumed Benefit Limited Clientele Activity
12. ANTICIPATED ACCOMPLISHMENTS
Project will assist the City of temecula in complying with ADA requirements.
Project will also enhance recreational opportunities for handicapped residents in
the City.
Check if-continued on additional pages(s) and attach.
13. CDBG 'COMPONENT ACTIVITIES PROGRAM YEAR FUNDS(in thousands of $)
(List component activities using names CDBG OTHER
of activities shown in Part A, COST Low/Mod Other Amount Source
SUMMARY, Form HUD-7067.) Benefit Benefit
(a)
Architectural Barriers Removal
(b) (c) (d) (e)
S30,000 S S
14. Totals $30,000
15. Total Costs To Be Paid With Community Development Grant Funds
(Sum of Columns b and c) $30,000
EXHIBIT C r"iLL: 1.TMO14
Page 1
SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT
Cooperative Agency: City of Temecula
Address: 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula
Project Title: Operation School Bell
Location: P.O, Box 1212, Temecula0 CA 92593
Description: The Assistance League of Temecula Valley operates the Operation
School Bell program which provides proper school clothing'to needy youth from
qualified households attending school in Temecula, Murrieta and Lake Elsinore.
CDBG funds will be used to purchase enough clothing for approximately 150
children.
This project serves limited clientele; therefore, the attached document for Direct
Benefits needs to be filled out and submitted to the County of Riverside EDA on
a monthly basis, Should there be no services rendered, submit a form indicating
NO SERVICE.
Pro~iect Budget:
Cost
CDBG ADDroved
1) Architect/Engineer Design Costs $
2) Administration Costs
3) Planning Costs
4) Acquisition Costs
5) Construction Costs
6) Relocation Costs
7) Equipment Costs
8) Other Costs 10,000
(purchase clothing supplies)
9) Operation/Maintenance
10) Contingency
.~. TOTAL $ 100000
10,000
$ 10,000
EXHIBIT C
Page 2
1.i'M014
Timetable Implementation Schedule
Milestone
Obtain bids for clothing
Purchase clothing
Submit claim for clothing
to City
Begin Distribution of clothing
Submit Status Report
Complete project
Start Date
11/01/93
12/01/93
01/01/94
02/01/94
Completion Date
12/01/93
12/15/93
0i/i5/94
02/28/94
06/30/94
EXHIBIT C
Page 3
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
ANNUAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
FROM
July 1. 1993
5. NAME OF PROJECT
Operation School Bell
PROJECT SUMMARY
PERIOD OF APPLICABILITY
TO
1. NAME OF APPLICANT
County of Riverside
2. APPLICATION/GRANT NUMBER
B-93-UC-06-0506
June 30, 1994
Original (each year)
Revision, Date
Amendment, Date
6. PROJECT NUMBER 7. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW STATUS
1.TM014 Exempt
8. ENTITY WITH RESPONSIBILITY FOR CARRYING OUT THE PROJECT
Assistance League of Temecula Valley
9. TELEPHONE NUMBER
(909) 677-8566
Bonnie Hinman
10. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
The Assistance League of Temecula Valley operates the Operation School Bell
program which provides proper school clothing to needy youth from qualified
households attending school in Temecula, Murrieta and Lake Elsinore. CDBG funds
will be used to purchase enough clothing for approximately 150 children.
ELIGIBILITY: 570.201(e)
BENEFIT: 570.208(a) (2)
Check if continued on additional page(s) and attach.
11. CENSUS TRACT(S)/ENUMERATION DISTRICT(S)
Limited Clientele Activity
12~ ~TICIPATED ACCOMPLISHMENTS
Program anticipates clothing approximately 600 eligible children during the
coming program year from throughout Southwest Riverside County area.
Check if continued on additional pages(s) and attach.
13. CDBG COMPONENT ACTIVITIES PROGRAM YEAR FUNDS(in thousands of $)
(List component activities using names CDBG
of activities shown in Part A, COST Low/Mod
SUMMARY, Form HUD-7067.] Benefit
Other Amount
Benefit
(a) (b) (c) (d)
Public Service $10,000 $ $
OTHER
Source
(e)
14. Totals
$10,000 S $
15~-Total Costs To Be Paid With Community Development Grant Funds
(Sum of Columns b and c) $10,000
EXHIBIT D
Page 1
PILE: I.UD~
SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT
Cooperative Agency: City of Temecula Public Works Dept.
Address: 43174 Business Park Dr.
Project Title: Pu~ol Street Improvements
Location: Pujol Street between 1st Street and the Temecula Town Association
Description: The "City of Temecula will utilize CDBG. funds to construct
improvements to Pujol Street in Old Town Temecula. The improvements will include
roadway widening and the installation of curb, gutter and sidewalk on East side
of Pujol Street from the Temecula Town Association to First Street.
Project Budget:
Cost
CDBG ADDroved
1) Architect/Engineer Design Costs
2 .dministration Costs
3) Planning Costs
4) Acquisition Costs
5) Construction Costs
6) Relocation Costs
7) Equipment Costs
8) Other Costs
9) Operation/Maintenance
10) Contingency
TOTAL
$ $
122,660 122,660
$ 122,660 $ 122,660
EXHIBIT D
Page 2
Timetable Implementation Schedule
Milestone
Prepare Plans, Specifications
and Bid Documents
Advertise for Bid
Award Contract
Notice to Proceed
Construction
Start Date
07/01/93
10/01/93
11/30/93
12/15/93
01/0~/94
Completion Date
09/01/93
11/09/93
11/30/93
03/01/94
EXHIBIT D
Page 3
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
ANNUAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
FROM
PROJECT SUMMARY
PERIOD OF APPLICABILITY
TO
July 1. 1993
FILE: 1.OD3
1. NAME OF APPLICANT
County of Riverside
2. APPLICATION/GRANT NUMBER
B-93-UC-06-0506
June 30, 1994
x Original (each year)
Revision, Date
Amendment, Date
5. NAME OF PROJECT
Pujol Street
8. ENTITY WITH RESPONSIBILITY FOR CARRYING OUT THE PROJECT
City of Temecula Public Works Dept.
6. PROJECT NUMBER 7. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW STATUS
1.053 Negative Declaration
9. TELEPHONE NUMBER
(909) 694-6411
10. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
The City of Temecula will utilize CDBG funds to construct improvements to
Pujol Street in Old Town Temecula. The improvements will include roadway widening
and the installation of curb, gutter and sidewalk on East'side of Pujol Street
from the Temecula Town Association to First Street.
ELIGIBILITY: 570.201(c) BENEFIT: 570.208(b)(1)
Check if continued on additional page(s) and attach.
11. CENSUS TRACT(S)/ENUMERATION DISTRICT(S)
Slum and Blight Removal
t~ ~NTICIPATED ACCOMPLISHMENTS
Project will enhance traffic and pedestrian circulation as well as improve
existing drainage conditions. Project will eliminate a slum and blighting
condition as identified in the Redevelopment plan.
Check if continued on additional pages(s) and attach.
13. CDBG COMPONENT ACTIVITIES PROGRAM YEAR FUNDS(in thousands of $)
(List component activities using names CDBG
of activities shown in Part A, COST Low/Mod
SUMMARY, Form HUD-7067.) Benefit
Other Amount
Benefit
(a)
Public Facilities and Improvements
(b) (c) (d)
$122,660 $ $
OTHER
Source
(e)
14. Totals $122,660 $ $
1. 9otal Costs To Be Paid With Community Development Grant Funds
(Sum of Columns b and c) $122,660
Pron~D~on Against Conilia-- oI lnneresn
EXHIBIT CI , page 1 of 4
570.611 Conflict of interest.
(a)
(1)
Applicability.
In the procurement of supplies, equipment, construction, and services'by
recipients, and by subrecipients (including those specified at
S 570.204(c)), the conflict of interest provisions in 24 CFR 85.36 and
OMB Circular A 110, respectively, shall apply.
(2)
In all cases not governed by 24 CFR 85.36 and OMB Circular A-110, the
provisions of this section shall apply. Such cases include the
acquisition and disposition of real property and the provision of
assistance by the recipient, by its subrecipients, or to individuals,
businesses and other private entities under eligible activities which
authorize such assistance (e.g., rehabilitation, preservation, and other
improvements of private properties or facilities pursuant to
S 570.202, or grants, loans and other assistance to businesses,
individuals and other private entities pursuant to S 570.203, § 570.204.
or § 570.455).
(b) Conflicts prohibited. Except for the use of CDBG funds to pay salaries
and other related administrative or personnel costs, the general rule is that no
persons described in paragraph (c) of this section who exercise or have exercised
any functions or responsibilities with .respect to CDBG activities assisted under
this part or who are in a position to participate in a decision-making process or
gain inside information with regard to such activities, may obtain a personal or
financial interest or benefit from a CDBG assisted activity, or have an intere'~,
in any contract, subcontract or agreement with respect thereto, or the procee,.-
thereunder, either for themselves or those with whom they have family or business
ties, during their tenure or for one year thereafter. For the UDAG program, the
above restrictions shall apply to all activities that are a part of the UDAG
project, and shall cover any such interest or benefit during, or at any time
after, such person's tenure.
(c) Persons covered. The conflict of interest provisions of paragraph (b) of
this section apply to any person who is an employee, agent, consultant, officer,
or elected official or appointed official of the recipient, or of any designated
public agencies, or subrecipients which are receiving funds under this part.
(d) ExcePtions: threshold requirements. Upon the written request of the
recipient, HUD may grant an exception to the provisions of paragraph (b) of this
section on a case-by-case basis when it determines that such an exception will
serve to further the purposes of the Act and the effective and efficient
administration of the recipient's program or project. An exception may be
considered only after the recipient has provided the following:
(1)
A disclosure of the nature of the conflict, accompanied by an assurance
that there has been public disclosure of the conflict and a description
of how the public disclosure was made; and
Prohibition Against Conflicts-of Interest
EXHIBIT CI, page 2 of 4
(e)
(2)
An opinion of the recipient's attorney that the interest for which
the exception is sought would not Violate State or local law.
Factors to be considered for exceptions. In determining whether to grant
a requested exception after the recipient has satisfactorily met the
requirements of paragraph (d) of this section, HUD shall consider the
cumulative effect of the following factors, where applicable:
(i)
Whether the exception would provide a significant cost benefit or an
essential degree of expertise to the program or project which would
otherwise not be available;
(2)
Whether an opportunity was provided for open competitive bidding or
negotiation;
(3)
Whether the person affected is a member of a group or class of low
or moderate income persons intended to be the beneficiaries of the
assisted activity, and the exception will permit such person to
receive generally the same interests or benefits as are being made
available or provided to the group or class;
(4)
Whether the affected person has withdrawn from his or her functions
or responsibilities, or the decision-making process with respect to
the specific assisted activity in question;
(5)
Whether the interest or benefit was present before the affected
person was in a position as described in paragraph (b) of this
section;
(6)
Whether undue hardship will result either to the recipient or the
person affected when weighed against the public interest served by
avoiding the prohibited conflict; and
(7)
Any other relevant considerations.
.Prohibition Against Conflicts of Interest
Exhibit CI, page 3 of 4
Community Dvlpmt.
Block Grant
Policy Manual
I.D. # A-11
(pg. 1 of 2)
TOPIC:
CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODED
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AGENCY
DATE: October 1989
This Conflict of Interest Code is written to comply with Federal Regulations (24
CFR Part 85). These Regulations. "Administrative Requirements for Grants and
Cooperative Agreements to State, Local and Federally Recognized Indian Tribal
.Governments" require that grantees and sub-grantees will maintain a written code
of standards of conduct governing the performance of their employees engaged in
the award and administration of contracts.
1) No employee, officer or agent of the grantee shall participate in the
selection, in the award or in the administration of a contract supported
Federal Funds if a conflict of interest, real or apparent, would be involved
2) Such a conflict will arise when:
i) The employee, officer or agent;
ii) Any member of the immediate family;
iii) His/Her partners, or;
iv) An organization which employs, or is about to employ any of the above
has a financial or other interest in the firm's selection for award.
3) The grantee's or sub-grantee's officers, employees or agents will neither
solicit nor accept gratuities, favors or anything of monetary value from
contractors or parties to sub-agreements except as noted in Section 4.
4) A grantee's or sub-grantee's officers, employees or agents will be presumed
to have a financial interest in a business if their financial interest exceeds the
following:
i) Any business entity in which the official has a direct or indirect
investment worth one thousand dollars ($1,000) or more.
ii) Any real property in which the official has a direct or indirect interest
worth one thousand dollars ($1,000) or more. ~
Prohibition Against Conflicts of Interest
Exhibit CI, page 4 of 4
TOPIC:
DATE:
iii)
iv)
v)
5)
Community Dvlpmt.
Block Grant
Policy Manual
I.D. # A-11
(pg. 2 of 2)
CONFLICT. OF INTEREST CODE
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AGENCY
October 1989
Any source of income, other than gifts and other than loans by a
commercial lending institution in the regular course of business on terms
available to the public without regard to official status, aggregating
two hundred fifty dollars ($250) or more in value provided to, received
by or promised to the official within 12 months prior to the time when
the decision is made.
Any business entity in which the official is a director, officer,
partner, trustee, employee, or holds any position of management.
Any donor of, or any intermediary or agent for a donor of, a gift or
gifts aggregating two hundred fifty dollars ($250) or more in value
provided to, received by, or promised to the official within 12 months
prior to the time when the decision is made.
For purposes of Section 4, indirect investment or interest means any
investment or interest owned by the spouse or dependent child of an
official, by an agent on behalf of an official, or by a business entity
or trust in which the official, the official's agents, spouse, and
dependent children own directly, indirectly, or beneficially a 10-percent
interest or more.
ITEM NO. 10
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY ~
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
June S. Greek, City Clerk
January 11, 1994
Letter of Support for ABo927
RECOMMENDATION: Direct staff to prepare a letter indicating City Council support of
Assembly Bill No. AB-927 as it will be reintroduced in the 1994 Legislative Session.
BACKGROUND: The City Council has received correspondence dated December 27, 1993
from Trudy K. Thomas requesting an official letter of support for AB927. Staff has been
advised that this bill is tentatively scheduled to be heard in the Assembly Public Safety
Committee during the week of January 10th,. so a letter could be transmitted to the
committee via FAX if this is the Council's desire.
JSG
R:~gende.fl~',ABI27 I
4tq86 cjHaxJno~tla t__~t~z~ · c/lt[.~izta, Cc4 9~6z · 9o9 /6T/-a?6~
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
FROM:
December 27, 1993
June Greek, City Clerk - City of Temecula
Trudy Thomas, Chairperson, SW Riverside County Care
Coalition
Letter of Support for AB927
Please see attached documents, We are requestinS a letter of
support for AS927 as it will be reintroduced in January of the
i°~4 Le'i .
... ~ slative Session Either a letter from the City or from
individual Councilmen and Staff would be appreciated.
Mill =~.' ~ ~, of January, (the dat~ o~ your
~ It, Sacramento +h~ ll~h ,
r~c'-xt ~o~,r,~ meeting) but i car, have a representative receive the
...... = ,,.
~r o, suppot+ Please contact me at 677-4761 or
Thar, l~ you.
NaT ONg CBwER
for Children and Families
AB-927 - "THE SEXUALLY EXPLOITED CHILDREN'S ACT"
IOAID OF ~ECTOIS
H. I~OEIfi' SHOWERS, ~SQIJtE
Paint. Gem'~n & (rqe P.C.
Wgsmgan. O.C
~N[ WAJID. ESOUIRE
ImmmlL~wCeefef~Chdom~&fenlg
Pame. Poe,f, lkmv, Word & Cevnn
ElINEST ALAN. ESOIJW,[
I~ml Ce~m te,' Atem
M~5. JIJDY BUICK
/uexonam. Va'.mn~
~S. DEE
Nomaol (ommgn.
h~x. V.k!~
DR JEERY IORI(
Cm
OOI.D P. I~KMtP, [50UIR[
Po~me
Km~, ~r~ & I(jeco~
DR IUCIVdlD LIND
im',m~ 5,feint, (.hn~ late
I~OBERI IAC~. ESOUE
RICF~D 5(HWMB, ESOelE
W~. D.C
JOHN [ S~JiBO,
REVEREND MY WOLr
According to the SexuaUy Exploited Child- Unit of the Los Angeles Police Department,
the sexual exploitation of children is manifested in three primary categories: 1) the physical
molestation of children; 2) child prostitution; 3) child pornography. All three categories are
interests of the pedophile, for without such individuals them would be litde demand for these
perversities. Some pedophiles seek employment or volunteer programs involving children.
Pornographic material depicting children involved in sexual activities is frequdntly
utilized to do the following: 1) sexually stimulate the toolester; 2) alesensitize children and
educate them as to the desire of the toolester; 3) blackmail children into silence; 4) facilitate
the molestation of additional children. The disribution of child pornography involves an
international, underground "cottage" network of pedophiles. '
California's current law is far too lenient and fails to protect all of Calffornia's children.
For example, possession of child pornography is a misdemeanor offense, but only ff the child
depicted is under 14 years of age. The distribution of child pornography is a misdemeanor
offense, but only ff the child depicted is under 17 years of age. Federal law and the laws of
several other states protect all children under the age of 18 and make these offenses felonies.
AB-927 will do the following:
Raise the age to under 18 years in all child pomography and sexual exploitation statutes.
This is crucial for two masons: (1) Quite often child development experts will disagree as to
whether a child is under 14 years, even though they can all agree that the child is under 18
years; therefore, when this happens, a possession case can't be prosecuted successfully; (2)
Raising the age to under 18 years would make these laws consistent with California's laws
which prohibit sexual conduct involving a person under 18 years.
(Plans are underway to intreduce other pwvisions which were in AB-927 as separate Bills in
1994. They will strengthen these hws further.)
AB-927 does not change any substantive definitions in the current laws whatsoever.
Therefore, it creates no First Amendment or any other constitutional problems. The U.S.
S~preme Co-rt has consistently held that child l;~ornography is not protected bv the First
Amendmen*.. New York v. Ferber, 458 U.S. 747 (1982) and Osborne v. Ohio, 169 L.Ed.2d
98 (1990).
This Bill, which was drafted by the National Law Center for Children and Families, is
scheduled to be reheard in the Assembly Public Safety Committee in January, 1994.
10~/93
,'~tiotuzl Office
3.97.5 Univemn.- Drive. Suite 320
Faiffax. Virgnnia 220.=0
("03~ 6914626 · ('03:691-4600 FAX
l~st Coast Office
121 E..Dyer Road. Suite 220
Santa Aria. Calfforma 9~05
· C714) 43-5-9090 · (714) ,i3'~4B23 FAX
California and Child Pornography
Santa Rosa Press Democrat, October 23, 1993 - Sonoma County man was convicted on 76 counts of
felony child molestation recorded on a videotape. The children, ages 4, 6, and 7 were coerced into
sex acts with adults, including their mother and each other.
Los Angeles, KNBC T.V, Ocwber 22, 1993 - News at 5:00 and 6:00 P.M. 59 year-old male held on
one million dollar bond after his arrest for possession of child pornography by Riverside County
Sheriffs Department Officers seized over 100 Polaroid photos, over 20 videotapes of 100 boys
ages 10-16, and over 100 "kiddie pore' magazines. Three boys have been identified; many believed
to be homeless, nm-aways who accepted food or money in exchange for sex with the suspect who
resides in Palm Springs.
Los Angeles, October 5, 1993, KNBC "Nightside News" - L.A.P.D. Sexually Exploited Child Unit
requested public's help in identifying adult male and fernale in photos depicting their graphic,
explicit sexual molestation of a girl estimated to be 3 years old.
Los Angeles T'~nes,/uly 9, 1993, page A1. - Garden Grove, CA - A complaint filed alleged that
foster parents turned their home inw a hostel for child sexual abuse wha-~ children were sexually
abused and used in pornographic movies.
Orange County Register, May 29, 1993, page Metro 4. - Garden Grove, CA -'Man arrested on
charges of having made lewd videos of young children, mostly ages 9 - 12, in his home and during
phow shows at Cypress College. The tapes were sold through his company, Pleasure Time Videos.
Modesto Bee, May 27, 1993 - A 51 year-old computer consultant is accused in a 17 count indictment
of kidnapping, lewd and lascivious conduct with children ages 7 to 10 and production of videotapes,
some of which depict him molesting the children.
Orange County Regist~, May 4, 1993, page 1. - Orange, CA - A 12 year old girl, who was used to
satisfy the sexual perversions of a couple who videotaped it all, died at age 26 afar a life of drug
abuse and work as a "pore' star.
* U.P.L Wire Service, April 22, 1993. - Los Angeles and Orange Counties - Four men arrested in a
child pore ring. Photos of girls as young as 3 years old were found.
Los Angeles Times, April 20, 1993, page B1. - Midway City, CA - Orange County Sheriff's
Deputies arrested a 30 year old Midway City man who they alleged moleswxi a 10-year old neighbor
and recorded the aas on a video camera.
San Bernardino Sun, April 2, 1993. - San Bemartlino County, CA. - A retired California Highway
Patrol Captain was arrested for offering child pore in exchange for sex with two girls, ages 9 and 11.
A search produced between 600-800 videos and thousands of photographs of child pornography.
Miarni U.P.I. Wire Service, March 4, 1993. - Search wan'ants for a computefizexl child pornography
ring were served in 30 cities in the United States including s~,en California cities...Westminst~, Los
Angeles, Los Gaws, Petalurea, Lakeside, Moreno Valley and San Francisco. "The thing that is so
uoubling about this hi-tech child porn is that it can be endlessly duplicated, endlessly sold, and the
child involved is endlessly victimized," said Customs spokesman, Michael Sheehan.
* L.A. Daily Jounml, February 8, 1993, page 3. Santa Barbara, CA - Tapes were found of an uncle's 3
year sex torture of his niece. The abuse began when the niece was 13 years old. The evidence was
discovered among his X-rated video collection.
10/",5/93
This may be reprin~d in its original form - without charge and 1mot written approval.
SATURDAY
:JULY31, 2993
My Vi, ew/Guest Column
to bE on clnLd pomograY-.V
~ ~ssst lalme prison ~ for %hese exploners of snni~r w i~ have been upheld by
~,~nsi,m-~ our ch~
If Mr. Ro~e~ ever publXshes a po- Tnue champs would have made
]jucad thesaurns. lne xerms 'oog CalLlorma law consm~en~ wi~ the
az~ pony snow."smoke az~ nut- federa/Law and rue laws of many
ton,' au~ 'polir. ical anyel amd de- omer raw. s.
cepz;i~' have ~ be ~ as
s.vnonvms.
In ~iifornia the~ are more
than 60,000 conwcmd sex oftend-
en, 79 penant of wnnm molested
crimes ax~ recorded cn ~im or vide-~
ompe- This is whs~ child pornogra-
phy is -- a crime scene
pn~ntn'aph- In Califorma. lhe pos-
sumon of chikl pornoiTaphy is
pureshed as a ,-,-demeanor of-
iense bm nnly Lf the child depicted
isunder
--i~-.e--or' nfensa. CeruinJy.
we Calfformans value our children
more Tinart tkn.~
Zu adaiuon. the bill would have
opez~ California's se~ offender
~[L,,,sn'aUon z~conis ',o
nons that work primarily wnh
plo.vees or volunmen who would
smnnec~U~selswsmanvotherway.
The bill as =,---~-y was
t~.~,~i--- ~n ~ ,7. The cam*
~v, ee Was .nmsed or five
ersls _,rid two BEp'h~iP"n% ~ iS
;,,-~-ed by Democrat Bob E pie of
l:L-.pub~.---= snppon~ ~n~ bilk now.
One of Mx. ~pple's
w~or~ him w mou=e about hi~
sinon m'x AB92~ .'1~. Eppie w~.r~
the U.S Supreme Coun-
AB17 reFulaw-s "material hann-
public news tacit. h.
adult supen'i~Xon of newsracks
winch eop,~in ~ max~x'~zd and
which are ioeav~l within 2,50 tset
of s school
As you can see, it is about as effec-
tive s$ m~ mental capan~ of the
pnxium's of me man.
~nnt rocket menU.~, bin, ~n you
don~ have w be to f~,ure out ti~tt if
you locate v~r newsrack 250 or
~ad pornography have enu~j.v dif-
ieren~ defimnons m the law. tlasi-
for adu~s w puren&se Dm
non. 1~ focuses nn wh~n~r
eipi~n~ of ~ ~ is a minnr.
Child pomo~alm.y foeu.~a on
wixe~er me p~rson ~epxca~ m me
· Because nnly one of ~
er-u lad the ~olinel sumaeh
vot~ no, v;ney failed w ~
I~willnere, hun~mmesan~mm-
:: ~ April, a Te/:i.Ted California leuer of response:
-- H~ghwa Pam~l eap,-i,~ was at- '~ ~id not vo~e on AB927 benuse
rested ~Y me .c,.~, Bernardino
" .I had previously supponsd AZI17
~ County sneri~s depamnen~ for of- which provided for the m~vimu/n
1 fenng ch:dd pornography m return control' (alloweg by the Supreme
for sex with xwo girls, 9 and 1L A Court} of child pornography.
', ~ Of ~ hozne produced hun- WhexJner we like it or not, ~hi" ~ ~f yon want W provide be~er
sue has b~n defined by the u- x~t~nu for CaliXornia's chil~
~,' dn'sds of videoups and tk~us&uds S
~ .the aqe ~ ~ engaged m sex acr. s role is i,--,u,t by courL dec~sioz~ despicable scr. s on film or vide-
; w~ others. TUe Supreme Court wi3J utti- or. apes. born those who use these
i; ~ J.f cauvic't~, he could face a mateiv determine what ieE4=l~Uon crime scene pJ~tograp~s r,o
1,p--i~um one-vearjail s-n,~pce Or is con~P/tion~ 8n~l beheve that other ~ ~ T. In~se ~ m
' a free of SLS00'. or bor. t~ for nsses- ABI~ wi~ wir, hsmnd ~neix scruUny them w b~an~2nail d~iid~en, and
r. sion d child pornography. ~ A,-i- and AB 927 ~ n~t." from ~hose who furdn~ n-ploi~
-~ oz~, he jould have received 12 w Epple's rsponse q,,,,li6es fo~ in- these vi:nmized children bv
?= 22yursinpristmforeaehpieeeof dusmninlheabovesmngofpoliti- mere posse,~on nf these
" eal synonym& ~raphs and mpe~, you nesd
· : pornoEraphy.. w the
· t · d~i/aren. ~ ~alue theix AB17 h2s BOthin" wha?~Boevel' ~ fflake VOU l:~S
dO with ~ moWntphy, and Ca.l.ifo/nia
:,- t~ h
· AB927, The Senreally Exploi d Mx. Zpple sh~n~ know that. Ris Then, you must hold them
?. : Chikiren's An. w~uld have co-,-~i,_t~ confiucted the eanng cmmt. sble.
" s~rengthened Calfforma's child on ABI? as wall His conclusion Jasct LaRue irsesior cousul
~. porno phv laws by ~g the fna~ AB927 is no~ consti~ur. ional is the National Law Cev,er.ior
-- age o~r~ iffecugl chilaren w un- ludicrous. asd Familiu...~e is ~c asuwr of
" tier 18 an~ wou/d haw made ~e Child pornography has no cons~ AB927.
WE SUPPORT AB927
Please add our name in support of AB927 - "THE SEXUALLY EXPLOITED CHn-DREN'S
ACT'. We want to join with other citizens from various backgrounds, pwfessions, churches,
political affiliations and other orgsni,qtions throughout California supporting this Bill, which will
strengthen the current California hw to more adeqtuttely proltct our children from sexual
exploitation. I understand that my name will be listed with other citizens in support of the above-
stated Bill and this does not commit us to involvement in any activities or projects unless we give
prior consent.
Organization
Signature Date
Phone number
Please mail to:
Natonal Law Center for Children and Families
1221 E. Dyer Rd., Ste. 220
Santa Ana, CA 92705
This may be reprinted in its original form - without charge and prior written approval.
ITEM NO.
11
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
/r~Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
January 11, 1994
Completion and Acceptance of the Jefferson Avenue Storm Drain
Improvements at Winchester Road, Project No. PW93-01
PREPARED BY:
Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council accept the Jefferson Avenue Storm Drain Improvements at Winchester
Road, Project No. PW93-01, as complete and direct the City Clerk to:
File the Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a one
(1) year Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract, and
Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after the filing of the
Notice of Completion if no liens have been filed.
BACKGROUND:
On September 14, 1993, the City Council awarded a contract for the Jefferson Avenue Storm
Drain Improvements, Project No. PW93-01, to Accurate Construction Inc. for $61,084.55.
The project included installation of underground storm drain pipes to convey water across the
east side of the Jefferson/Winchester intersection to reduce the flooding during storm periods.
And removal of the existing concrete cross gutter to provide a smoother transition across
Jefferson Avenue.
The Contractor has completed the work in accordance with the approved plans and
specifications and within the allotted contract time to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
The construction retention for this project will be released thirty-five (35) days after the Notice
of Completion has been recorded.
pwO4%agdfpt%94V)111%pw93-01 .ao~ 1228
FISCAL IMPACT: ---,
The contract amount for this project was ;61,084.55 with e contingency of ;6,108.46. The
total cost of the project will increase due to a change in the final bid quantities of $4,308.00,
bringing the total project cost to ;65,392.55. This project is · Capital Improvement Project
and is being funded from Measure A.
Attachment: Notice of Completion
Maintenance Bond
pwO4~mgdrpt%94%0111%pw93-01 .ace 1228
RECORDING REQUES s eu BY
AND RETURN TO:
CITYCI.BII(
CITY OF TEMECULA
43174 bineee Peek I)vive
Terneerie, CA 92590
IPACE ABOVE THII LINE FOR
RECORDER'I USE
NOTICE OF COMPLETION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT:
1. The City of Temecula is the owner of the property hereinafter described.
2. The full address of the City of Temecula is 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula,
California 92590.
3. A Contract was awarded by the City of Temecula to Accurate Construction Inc. to
perform the following work of improvement:
PW93-01 Storm Drain on Jefferson Avenue at Wincheater Road.
4. Said work was completed by Mid company according to plans and specifications and
to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works of the City of Temecula and that said work was
accepted by the City Council of the Cit~ of Temecula at a regular meeting Thereof held on January 11,
1994. That upon said contract the CBIC Contractors Bonding and Insurance Company was surety
for the bond given by the said company as required by law.
5. The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the City of
Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, and is described as follows: PROJECT PW 92-12.
6. The street address of said property is: INTERSECTION OF JEFFERSON AVENUE AND
WINCHESTER ROAD.
Dated at Temecula, California, this _ day of
· 1994.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
CITY OF TEMECULA
SS
JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California and do hereby certify under penalty of
pedury, that the foregoing NOTICE OF COMPLETION is true and correct, and that said NOTICE OF
COMPLETION was duly and regularly ordered to be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder of
Riverside by said City Council.
Dated at Temecula, California, this day of
· 1994.
JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk
Fonm/CIP-O01 Rt, v. 12-5-91 pwO4%pwO3-O1%oompletn.not 121393
REC'E!'VED'
JAN - 5 1994
CITfOFT~,,.. CULA
ENGINEERING DEPARTTMENT
CITY OF TEMECULA. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
BOND NO. CA 7484 M PREMIUM:INCLUDED
MNNTENANCE BOND
PROJECT NO, PWe).01
JERtFRION A~ STORM DIMav #" .,jVEMENTS
A T illVCil,,$taw ROAD
KNOW ALL MEN BY TH!IE PRr~ENTE THAT;
ACCURATE CONSTRUCTION, INC. 3.732 "D" CERRITOS AVE., LOS
N4ME ~RI) ADDRESS OF CON/~ C/OR
ALAMITOS, CA 90720
CALIFO_RNIA CORPORATION
. heroinafter caned Pdncil, d. and
.. CgNTRACTORS BONDING AND INSURANCE COMPANY, 23172
LAGUNA HILLS, CA 92653 NAMEAI~AD~(~~
PLAZA POINTE DRIVE NO. 185
herOinafter Galled SURETY. are Mid end firmly bound unto CITY OF TEMECULA,
hare~nalter callad OWI~R, in the ensl sum of _ S IX THOUSAND O_NE HUNDRED E~G.H~ 'AND, 4 ~ / 100' S
~ (41 6,108.4~ ) In lawfd money of the United STate, for tile eyelint a
which sum we41 end Truly to be made. we bind ourselves. successors and assigns, ]olrkly and
severely, firmly by them presents.
THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION is such that whereas, the Prlndpal entered into I cedein
Conyact with the OWNER, dsted the 14TH day el SEPTEMBER., 19 9~ a copy Of which is
hereto attached end made a pert hereof lot the cemltructlon of PROJICT NO. PW)3-O¶ ~
WHIREAt. said CoatraGS provtdee that tim Pdn~tpel wRt furnish a bond condltjoned to gu~J entee
for the pedal el ~ year altar epixovel ef the final estimate on said job. by the OWNER, Niainst
all defects in workrnansfdp and mrlels which may becme ellarent dudrig said perit~; end
WHEFIEA$. the laid Contract has brain completed, and was epproved on
lg 9_J_4,
JANUARY llTH
NOW, THEREORE, THE CONDITION OF TFII OBUOATION iS SUCH, dot if within ore y If
the date of approval of the maid Coatroot, the work done under the tams of eekf ConlTiot
disclose poor w,xkmlrlhip In the exlcutlon of said work. and the carrying OUt Of the terms of said
Contract, or It sisal appeal mm defeatire materials were furnished thereunder, then this o!~ligetion
shall reme|n in full fmoe end vIFtue, otherwin this instrument shall bo void.
~igr~d and aeaJed this 30TIt day of DECEMBER . lg 93.
CONTRACTORS BONDING AND INSURANCE COMPANY
LINDA D. COATS
ATTORNEY IN FACT
Fritiei" "
ACCURATE CONSTRUCTION, II'C ·
PRINCIPAL
[Fl~le)
APFROViD A9 TO FORM:
By:.
Sco~ F; ~eld, City Attorney
~Name)
MAINTENANCE BOND
ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT
State of CALIFORNIA
Count~ of LOS ANGELES
On 12/30/93before me,
Date
personally appeared
CHRISTOPHER J. COATS, NOTARY PUBLIC ,
Name, Title o! ORicer - e.I. 'jane Doe, Notary Public*
LINDA D. COATS ,
Nome(s) o/SiSm~s)
[]
personally known to me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to
be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed []
to the within instrument and acknowledged to
me that he/she/they executed the same in his/ []
her/their authorized capaclty(les), and that by
GOMM. ~9694~rso~) acted, executed the Instrument.
Al"l'Elq'flON NOTARY: Althoulh the inlormation requested below Is OPllON~L, it could p~event fraudulent attachment of this ce~i~cate to unautho~v. ed documents.
THIS CERTIFICATE
MUST BE ATTACHED
TO THE DOCUMENT
DESCRIBED AT RIGHT:
Title or Type of Document
Number of Pages
Date of Document
OPTIONAL SECTION
CAPACITY CLAIMED BY 51GNEI~---
[] Individual(s)
[] Corporate
Officer(s)
Titus}
Partner(s)
Attorney-in-Fact
Other:
MscALPA,OI-CAI22892
ii~ihm~alWedami.~mmlmpmmmmmimmmy. im. lmdtimCmm~HDA D. COATS
betd~dtheCan~nv~he~eauf~ybe~d~wk~hm~e~inmtetimebe~p~e~edby~t~d~i~T~i~mm~~m~ cseddbmseameybeappreeed
by;kL, 1'kiwibrbemTWeL
ieiiadg)RMINlRwtbeteect~FmeedNtemeymueteelketklleelmdi~deempllemdtlwlxedlo~ lepptie~,lke Nme dtim ldncipd, bmme dlhe eWig~lhe pead smn, Uie
RLTkielmgeraTbid;aedmmy edlodktbe~NrJitalioeer. l eemetdeddinlmimeeeemmmleleml, iramr.
BafbafahiddNmsne;eumyimidar4efadedbewdiee;fimeNical~epirdiee ddelobeckedlfadfedhinmymfilmnFewwdNtefmey.
~r~mmW~mmdempm~mmm~e~m~mdmmmmmmbmmd(Lm..~mmm~mm~mi~mkmb~mbem~mm~em;mmm~$~'2ii~"~mbemdim~m~W~i
(b)~hePee~sum~mm~/kedmtgumMeedbythe~md~eimees/ad~d~abd~:"x(o~kert~mnm~~m~Mm(q~m~~m~W~
~iB~JJ~F~iR~b~emb~wermmed~bmme~mm.~Ktim~mmtedpeeermndmd~mii~oemaeed~m~d~i~i~n~~q~e~
immnmmmmmmte~mmm~mm~mmmmmmmmm/m~m~ii~i~m~m~mmimmmmmm`e~dmm~ramL~d~~~~~b~i~~h~
m~lDe~mmtlmdemcqmbe~mndmmemmldNklibDmmimmmmmmlmmle~WmmmlmfimimtkePmmm~d~
Fei~i.~)RIItfiilllmllmeulkmdledlmleeemv oi lke Cmmmpemy to erfl/ em mm~jly med elel;fmmmmm d l~ foregaieg mmetmm mm m enV Linmiml ~ m #llm'r,m~ im
dek9aiedtetke~eg~metmeem~amimmbmmedm~d~m~o~iem~tebiedt~mCeqmmmyd~~m~e~d~eqm~mi~b
Sec~Ny dtke C4mpeny: R.L Tk id, Bedim TliW or Atom Creel.
~ ~ Ihet IIm akjnatmel (indudikJ cedfiialme Iket lie Pele~ d ACeriley ia atdl in lorc8 end dlacq d R.L. Tkm or kebefe fkieL. end Nolely Pub/it, and l~e
hq~ e lNamie9 ef~ lay Li~llid Poser oi AIofaef cmlleinm9 fkb iald the folegei~g readulionm ee wel me tke Litneed Power d Alof~ey lead~ e endl ee ib Iren~mb~m, fay be
tm;mimile; reed muc, h I. inded Ibeer d Altmnm/mMII be dmmmmd en minireel in ell elmilL
~ t~RIIB! fief eli mmoklmna im4opled peer ~ !odly appmml ag Ike mbee nemea ime ellN~e),-i n4ecl lm !he G~lllleey We e euperaede(I.
e~xed
R,L. Thiel
8TATE OF CALiFORNiA -- COUNTY OF ORANGE
(~NTRACIT3R8 BONDING AND INSURANCE CIX41aAN*t'
On ) / 0 4 / (:) 3 ~bmi~re mm,vdemm~m zMm9e~m~'idmyFim~dic mandim ttmi~mtm~fCd~mrei~Cmmm~yd~pa~LT~m~mT~k~mi~
IheperaemmwlloseilmmafeambacfbedlotkewilhimLimiledFeeef~Atkmnef~kk~i~ Jlofaet~dtheymlldlheaemeiltfleiaudlmizedmqal;lmmendU~by~eir~i
Lniad Pomr d Al~'ney CBiCeaecsad tim Lmmded l~eeer el Ata~aey.
· ITEM NO. 12
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVA~
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Tim D. $erlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
January 11, 1994
Contract Amendment No. 1 for Professional Surveying and Geotechnical
Services for the Ynez Road Widening Project, PW92-05, CFD 88-12
PREPARED BY:
Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council approve Contract Amendment No. 1 for additional Professional
Services for the Ynez Road Widening Project, PW92-05 for the following professional
services:
Professional Surveying Services by JFD Associates, Inc. in an amount not to
exceed 920,033.50
e
Professional Geotechnical Services by Law/Crandall, Inc. in an amount not to
exceed 96,586.00
DISCUSSION:
During the construction of the Ynez Road Widening Project additional professional
services were required for the following:
Survevino and Staking:
Additional surveying services were required as a result of changes to the contract
during the construction of the road improvements including revisions to the storm drain
line "A" and "D", extension of the median curb, location of revised handicap ramps,
additional driveways locations, curb grade and centerline staking for excavation of the
widen portions to establish the proposed subgrade, for a total of 919,283.50.
Surveying for extra work items include staking for the clearing operation and rough
grading along the south side of Solana Way, for a total of ~750.00.
A total of $2,910.00 will be deducted from the contractor's last progress payment for
re-staking various locations where staking was removed by the contractor's
construction.
SUBTOTAL $20,033.50
Soil Testino:
Additional field test for the removals of unsuitable material were required in various
areas including south of $olana Way, north of Empire Creek, south of Motor Car
Parkway, north of Rsncho California Road and for the rough grading on the south side
of Solana Way.
SUBTOTAL
$6,586.00
FISCAL IMPACT:
The cost of the additional surveying and staking in the amount of ~20,033.50, geotechnical
services in the amount of $6,586.00, for · total of $26,619.50 to provide professional
services. Funds are available from Community Facilities District 88-12.
pwO4%egdfpt%94%0111%amenynez.no1 1229
AMEND~ NO. 1
LF. Davidson Associates, Inc.
Ynez Road Widening Proj~
PURCHASE ORDER NO. 13824
The Agreement dated March 23, 1993 between the City of Temecula, and LF. Davidson
Associate, .Inc. (herein referred to as * Agreement*) is hereby amended as follows:
Professional Land Surveying Services for Ynez Road Widening, Project No. PW92-05
RE: Professional Land Surveying Services
Ynez Road Widening Project
Section 1
I. The scope of services as listed in exhibit "A" of the "Agreement' will remain unchanged.
Section 2
Compensation for services shall be total of all services described in this Amendment and shall
not exceed twenty thousand and thirty-three Dohrs and fifty cents
All above costs are eligible for funding through Community Facilities District 88-12. The total
cost of this element of the pwject is summarized below:
Original Contract Amount $ 54,187.00
Proposed Amendment No. 1 $ 90.033.50
Total Contract Amount $ 74.220.50
Section 3
All other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain the same.
The parlies hereto have executed this Agreement on the date and year above written.
B,y: ~ ~ , /~t//~ / ,...,
APPROVBD AS TO FORM:
By:
CITY OF TEMECULA
Scott F. Field, City Attorney
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
AMENDMENT NO. 1
Law/Cnmdall, Inc.
Ynez Road Widening Project
PURCHASE ORDER NO. 13823
The Agreement dated March 23, 1993 between the City of Temecula, and Law/Crandall, Inc.
(herein refen'ed to as * Agreement") is hereby amended as follows:
Professional Geotechnical Services for Ynez Road Widening, Project No. PW92-05
RE: Professional Geotechnical Services
Ynez Road Widening Project
Section 1
I. The scope of services as listed in exhibit "A" of the "Agreement" will remain unchanged.
Section 2
Compensation for services shall be total of all services described in this Amendment and shall
not exceed six thousand and five hundred and eighty-six Dollars and no cents ($6,586.00).
All above costs are eligible for funding through Community Facilities District 88-12. The total
cost of this element of the project is summarized below:
Original Contract Amount $ 31,400.00
Proposed Amendment No. 1 $ 6.586.00
Total Contract Amount $ 37.986.00
Section 3
All other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain the same.
The parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date and year above written.
CONSULTANT CITY OF TEMEC~A
By:
Steven J. Ford
By:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Scott F. Field, City Attorney
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
ITEM NO. 13
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
January 11, 1994
Contract Change Orders No. 36 through No. '40 for Ynez Road
Widening Project, PW92-05, CFD 88-12
PREPARED BY: ~-a,Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council approve Contract Change Order No. 36 through No. 40 for Ynez Road
Widening Project, PW92-05 for labor and equipment for various items of work, in the amount
of $12,711.68.
BACKGROUND:
During the construction of the Ynez Road Widening Project the following items of work have
resulted in a change to the contract:
CHANGE ORDER NO. 36
Provide four panels for the illuminated street name signs at the Town Center entrance to
revise the street name lettering.
SUBTOTAL: $634.20
CHANGF ORDER NO. 37
Remove a 1" PVC conduit for the existing parking lot lights in front of the Acura Dealership
and relocate it behind the new sidewalk.
SUBTOTAL: $823.23
pwO4~gdfpt~931,0111%pw92..05 122793
CHANGF ORDI=RNO. 38
Contract change order number 27 directed the contractor to install new electrical conduits and
wiring for the auto dealership perking lot lighting for an estimated cost of $3,180.00
The actual installation cost is $4,248.20, for · different of $1,068.20.
SUBTOTAL: $1,068.20
CHANGE ORDER NO. 39
Remove additional debris material that accumulated on the site, prior to and during
construction to an approved disposal site.
SUBTOTAL: $4.213.74
CHANGE ORDER NO. 40
During. the placement of the Line "D" storm drain pipe an additional 32 feet of 48" RCP pipe
was required. This additional length of pipe allowed for the storm drain outlet to extend past
the new slope embankment. The actual cost to extend Line "D" storm drain an additional 32
feet of 48" RCP pipe and install a head wall was $7,427.37 minus an amount provided for
in contract change order no. 35 ($1,455.06) for · balance of $5,972.31.
SUBTOTAL: $5,972.31
TOTAL: $12,711.68
FISCAL IMPACT:
On January 26, 1993, the City Council awarded a contract for the construction of Ynez Road
Widening from Rancho California Road to Palm Plaza, to Vance Corporation for
$2,612,811.29. Contract Change Order No.'s 01 through 35 were approvad for a total
amount of $448,614.04. Contract Change Order No.'s 36 through No. 40 are in the amount
of $12,711.68. Therefore, an additional $12,711.68 must be appropriated for the Ynez Road
Widening Project from CFD 88-12. There are adequate funds available in the CFD 88-12
construction account.
Attachments:
Contract Amendments
pwO4%egd~pt%93%0111~w92-05 122793
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive · Ternecula, California 92590
(909) 694-1989 ° FAX (909) 694-1999
CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 036
CONTRACT NO. PW92-05
PROJECT:
Ynez Road Widen,no - CFD 88-1
SHEET 1. of _1_
TO CONTRACTOR: Vance Coreoration
NOTE:
This change order is not effective until aooroved by the Enaineer
THIS CHANGE PROVIDES FOR:
An INCREASE in the following item:
Provide four panels for the illuminated ~treet name dgne at the Town Center entrance to
revise the street name lettering.
TOTAL: $634.20
Original Contract Amount: ...................................
Adjusted Contract Amount: ...................................
Change Order No. 036 .......................................
Total Contract Amount: .....................................
2,612,811.29
3,061,425.33
$ 634.20
3,062,059.53
Adjustment of Working Days: ................................. O
Approved: Principal Engineer By: z~~ y, Date:
all services necessary for the work above specified. and will accept as full payment therefore the prices °hewn above.
Dated Accepted:
Contractor:
(company's ~;me)
(signatu )
Name: L (~ -
-
(print)
If the contractor doe° not eign acceptance to thie order. hie attention ie dire~ed to the requirement° of ~e apeelf,oat, one ee
to proceeding with the ordered work end filing · written proteat within the time therein specified.
pwO4%cip%projecte%pw92-OS%cco%oeo36.e;o 010394
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive · Temecula, California 92590
1909l 694-1989 · FAX {9091 69 9
CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 037
CONTRACT NO. PW92-05
PROJECT:
Ynez Road Widenine - CFD 88-1 ~
SHEET 1__ of .j..
TO CONTRACTOR: Vance Corporation
NOTE:
This chanue order is not effective until aDDroved by the Engineer
THIS CHANGE PROVIDES FOR:
An INCREASE in the following item:
AS
Remove a 1" PVC conduit for the existing paring lot lights in from of the Acura Dealership
and relocate it behind the new sidewalk.
TOTAL: $823.23
Original Contract Amount: ....................................
Adjusted Contract Amount: ...................................
Change Order No. 037 .......................................
Total Contract Amount: .....................................
2,612,811.29
3,062,059.53
$ 823~-I
3,062,88;
Adjustment of Working Days: .................................
Approve.: Principal Engineer By: ~t-_/)~~ Date:/-
all seaices necessaw for the wo~ above specified. end ill ~cept M full payment letafore ~e prices ehown above.
Dated Accepted:
Contractor:
(com~me)
Name:
(print)
If the contractor does not sign acceptance to thie order, hie attention i$ directed to the requiremente of the specifications
to proceeding with the ordered work end filing · written protect within the tim therein epecifiecl.
pwO4%dp~wojects%pw12-OS~ce%cco37.cco 010394
City of Temecula
'43174 Business Park Drive · Ternecula, California 92590
(9091 694-1989
· FAX (9C)9) 694-1999
CONTRACT CHANGE= ORDER NO., 038
CONTRACT NO. PW92-05
PROJECT:
Ynez Road Widening - CFD 88-1
SHEET I of 1__
TO CONTRACTOR: Vance Corooration
NOTE:
This chanoe order is not effective until aooroved by the Eneineer
THIS CHANGE PROVIDES FOR:
An INCREASE in the following item:
Contract change order number 27 directed the contractor to install new electrical conduits and
wiring for the auto dealership paring lot lighting for an erdmated cost of 13,180.00. The
actual installation cost is 14,248.20, for a different of 11,068.20.
TOTAL: 11,068.20
Original Contract Amount: ...................................
Adjusted Contract Amount: ...................................
Change Order No. 038 .......................................
Total Contract Amount: .....................................
2,612,811.29
3,062,882.76
1,068.20
3,063,950.96
Adjustment of Working Days: ................................. 0
Approved: Principal Engineer By: Date:/- ~f -~
We the unclereigned contractor have given careful conel ratio o the change propoeed eP~l hereby agree. ;~thie propoaal
is epproved, that we will provide all equipm~'areful c~: i:, l,the~ey otherwiee be noted above, and perform
all services neceeeery for the work above epecified, end will accept aa full payment therefore the price ehown above.
Dated Accepted:
Contractor:
(comp n~'s name)
By: .,~ ~c,- Title:
L.~(signature)
Name: ~" - ~,v~c (~
(print)
If the contractor doee not eign acceptance to thie order, hi attention ie directed to the requirernente of the epecificatione ee
to proceeding with the ordered work and filing a written protect within the time therein apetitled.
pwO4%oip%projecte%pw92-O5%cco%oco38.cco 010394
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive · Ternecula, California 92590
(909) 694-1989 · FAX (909) 69,,/9
PROJECT:
TO CONTRACTOR:
NOTE:
CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 039
CONTRACT NO. PW92-05
Ynez Road Widenino - CFn 88-12
Vance Corporation
This chanae order is not effective until anDroved by the Enoineer
THIS CHANGE PROVIDES FOR:
An INCREASE in the following item:
Remove additional debris materld that accumulated on the site, prior to
construction to an approved disposal site.
Original Contract Amount: ...................................
Adjusted Contract Amount: ...................................
Change Order No. 039 .......................................
Total Contract Amount: .....................................
Adjustment of Working Days: .................................
SHEET I of 1
and dudng
TOTAL: $4,213.74
$ 2,612,811.29
$ 3,063,950 ~
$ 4,213
$ 3,068,164.70
0
Approved: Principal Engineer By: Date://-"~-
all services necessary for the work above specified, and will accept es full payment therefore the prices shown above.
Dated Accepted:
Name: .
(print)
Contractor:
Title:
If the contractor does not sign acceptance to this order, hie attention ie directed to the requirements of the specifications es
to proceeding with the ordered work and filing · written protest within the time therein specified,
pwO4%cip%projects%pw12-OS~cco%cco39.cce 010394
City of Temecula
I43174 Business Park Drive · Ternecula, California 92590
(909) 694-1989 · FAX (909) 694-1999
CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 040
CONTRACT NO. PW92-05
PROJECT:
Ynez Road Widening - CFD 88-12
SHEET _!_ of _!_
TO CONTRACTOR: Vance CorPoration
NOTE:
This change order is not effective until aDoroved by the EnD,near
THIS CHANGE PROVIDES FOR:
An INCREASE in the following item:
During the placement of the Line "D' ~torm drain pipe an additionai 32 feet of 48" RCP pipe
was required. This additional length of pipe allowed for the storm drain outlet to extend past
the new slope embankment. The actual cost to extend Une "D' storm drain an additional 32
feet of 48" RCP pipe and install a head wall was $7.427.37 minus an amount prodded for
in contract change order no. 35 ($1,455.06) for a balance of $5,972.31.
TOTAL: 15,972.31
Original Contract Amount: ...................................
Adjusted Contract Amount: ...................................
Change Order No. 040 .......................................
Total Contract Amount: .....................................
2,612,811.29
3,068,164.70
5,972.31
3,074,137.01
Adjustment of Working Days: ................................. Q
is approved, that we will provide all equipment, furnish all m~; otherwise be noted above, and perform
ell services necessary for the work above specified, and will accept a~ full payment therefore the prices shown above.
Dated Accepted: t/~A~ Contractor:
(compan~'~Zs name)
/ (signature)
Name: ~.~
(print)
If the contractor does not sign acceptance to this order,
to proceeding with the ordered work and filing a written protest within the time therein specified.
pwO4%dp~,orcjects%pwg2-OS~cso~,P,~o40.cco 010394
ITEM NO. 14
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVA
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning
January 11, 1994
Fifth Amendment to the Joint Powers Agreement Creating the Riverside County
Habitat Conservation Agency to Allow Compensation of 9100.00 for Board
Meeting Attendance
PREPARED BY:
Craig D. Ruiz, Assistant Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the attached amendment to Section 3.6 of the Joint
Powers Agreement Creating the Riverside County Habitat
Conservation Agency (the "Agreement") and Authorize the
Mayor to sign the amended Agreement.
BACKGROUND:
In 1990, the City of Temecula became a member of the Riverside County Habitat
Conservation Agency (RCHCA) Joint Powers Authority (JPA). The RCHCA is the organization
responsible for implementing the Section 10(a) Permit and the Short-Term Habitat
Conservation Plan (HCP) for the Stephens Kangaroo Rat (SKR). The HCP is administered
through an Agency Agreement with the California Department of Fish and Game (DF&G) and
a Section 10(a) Permit from the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
DISCUSSION:
The proposed amendment to the Agreement entitles members of the Board and their
alternates to receive compensation in the amount of 9100.00 for the attendance at and
participation in regular and special meetings of the RCHCA Board. Currently, the Agreement
precludes Board members from receiving compensation for attendance at RCHCA Board
meetings.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
A'I'I'ACHMENT:
Fifth Amendment to Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement Creating the Riverside
County Habitat Conservation Agency - Page
R:\S~STA~~f.AGR 12/17193 1j$ 1
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
FIFTH AMENDMENT TO JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT
CREATING THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION AGENCY
R:~S~STAFFRPT~JPAMBIqDS.AGR 12/17/93
YZF'LI ~ TO U'OZIT
O:F IlKNFER. I Ir~Ewl,Bli'E CiF, ZL'Z'ZNG
THIS FIFTH AMENDMENT TO ~OINT EXERCISE OF POWERS AGREEMENT
CREATING RIVERSIDE COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION AGENCY
Amendments) is made by and between THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, THE
CITY OF RIVERSIDE, THE CITY OF HEMET, THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE,
THE CITY OF MORENO V~xr.ts~y, THE CITY OF PEItRIS, THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, and THX CITY OF CORONA (collect4vely referred to as the
sPaz~ciess or the sMsmbsr Agenciess).
I~RCTTAT.-q
WHEREAS, THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, ~ CITY OF HEMET, THE CITY
OF LAKE ELSINORE, THE CITY OF MORENO V~T.T.~y, ~ CITY OF PERRIS and
THE CITY OF RIVERSIDE entered into that certain agreement entitled
~oint Exercise Of Powers A~reement Creating Riverside County
Habitat Conservation Agency (the sA~emmmnts); and
WHEREAS, the First Amendment To ~roint Exercise Of Powers
Agreement Creating Riverside County Habitat Conservation Agency
made THE CITY OF TEMECULA a par~y to the Agreement; 'and
WHEKF~, the Third Amendment To ~oint Exercise Of Powers
A~reement Creating Riverside County Habitat Conservation Agency
made THE CITY OF CORONA a par~y to the A~reemtnt; and
WHEREAS, the Member Agencies desire to further amend the
A~reement as follows.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties a~ree as follows:
1. The last sentence of the last paragraph of Section 3
sBoard of Directors' is hereby deleted end replaced by the
following:
DEO& 1725: 9/'50/93
'Members of the Board and their alternates shall be
entitled to compensation in the amount of One
Hundred Dollars ($100.00) per meeting for
attendance at end participation in regular and
special meetings of the Board. Except as
hereinabove expressly provided, members of the
Board and their alternates shall not be entitled to
any other salary or compensation for attendance at
or participation in meetings of the Board or for
any similar services rendered on behalf of the
Agency. m
2. The terms and conditions of the Agreement not expressly
amended by this Fifth Amendment shall continue in full force and
effect.
3. This Fifth Amendment shall become effective on the date
that execution of this Fifth Amendment is authorized by the last of
the governing bodies of the Member Agencies.
· IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Fifth
Amendment as of the date last set forth below and agree to abide by
its ~erms from that date forward.
Dated:
Attest:
Clerk of the Board
Dated:
Attest:
City Clerk
(Signature page continued)
COUFL~OFBZVIBBZDI
By:
Chairman, Board of Supervisors
CITY OF RZVIBSZDI
By:
Mayor
DEOG1725:9/50/93 --2 --
Dated:
Attest:
City Clerk
Dated:
Attest:
City Clerk
Dated:
Attest:
City Clerk
Dated:
Attest:
City Clerk
Dated:
Attest:
City Clerk
Dated:
Attest:
City Clerk
CZ'rZ' 01 HIMaT
By:
Mayor
CITY 01 Z.,,llkZl IZJZIO. BI
Mayor
Mayor
CITY OF PSiall
Mayor
CZTq&OF T~l~'Ula
Mayor
CITY OF COB2Ma
Mayor
DEC~1725:9/'50/93 --3 --
ITEM
NO.
15
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
City Clerk
January 11, 1994
Records Destruction Approval
RECOMMENDATION: Approve scheduled destruction of certain records as provided
under the City of Temecula a!~proved Records Retention Policy.
BACKGROUND: On March 22, 1992, the City Council approved Resolution No. 92-17
which authorizes the destruction of certain city records which have become outdated,
obsolete or are excess documents, in compliance with Sections 34090 through 34090.7 of
the Government Code.
The records management program, administered by the City Clerk's Office, is in the process
of microfilming all inactive records that are over two (2) years old. The attached exhibit
details plot plans for the years 1974 through 1988 which have been copied to microfilm.
Three microfilm copies have been prepared, one to be kept in the Planning Department, one
in the City Clerk's records vault and one in permanent off-site storage.
The City Attorney has reviewed this request and has signed Exhibit "1" of the Annual Review
as provided for in Resolution No. 92-17.
ATTACHMENTS:
JSG
Destruction of Records Request
Resolution No. 92-17
Exhibit "1" (Executed by City Attorney)
RESOLUTION NO. 92-17
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA AUTHORIZING THE
DESTRUCTION OF CERTAIN CITY RECORDS AS
PROVIDED BY SECTION 34090 OF THE
GOVERNMENT CODE OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA
WItEnd&S, the keeping of numerous records is not necessary after a certain period of
time for the effective and efficient operation of the government of the City of Temecula; and
WHERE&S, Section 34090 of the Government Code of the State of California provides
a procedure whereby any City record which has served its purpose and is no longer required
may be destroyed; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code Section 34090, the City Attorney has
reviewed and approved the Destruction of Obsolete Records Policy, attached hereto as Exhibit
"1" and incorporated by reference herein;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOL~ by the City Council of the City of Temecula
as follows:
SECTION 1. The records of the City of Temecula as set forth in groups on Schedule
I, Which schedule is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, are hereby
authorized to be destroyed as provided by Section 34090 of the Government Code of the State
of California and in accordance with the provisions of said schedule upon the request of the
department head and with the consent in writing of the City Attorney, without further action by
the City Council of the City of Temecula.
SECTION 2. The provisions of Section 1 above do not authorize the destruction of:
a. Records affecting the title to real property or liens thereon
b. Court records
c. Records required to be kept by statute
d. Records less than two (2) years old
The minutes, ordinances, or resolutions of the City Council of the City of
Temecula or of any City boards, committee or commission
31ssos 92-17 -1-
SECTION 3. Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 2, the duplicates of records not
less than five (5) years old which are no longer required are hereby authorized to be destroyed
as set forth in the attached Schedule A.
SECTION 4. The destruction of any record as provided for herein shall be by burning,
shredding or other effective method of destruction and said destruction shall be witnessed by the
City Clerk or her designee.
SECTION 5. The term *records° as used hercin shall include documents, instruments,
books, microfilm or papers.
PASSi~-r~, APPROVED AND ADOPTRD, by the City Council of the City of Temecula
at a regular meeting held on the 24th of March, 1992.
ATrF. ST:
Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
3/Ruo, 92-17 -2-
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMEC~ )
I, JUNE S. GI~I~-RK, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, HEI~I~.Ry DO CERTIFY that
the foregoing Resolution No. 92-17 was duly adopted a regular meeting of the City Council of
the City of Temecula on the 24th day of March, 1992, by the following roll call vote;
AYES: 5
COUNCIL~-~ERS:
Birdsall, Moore, Lindemans, Mufioz
Parks
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
June S. Greek, City Clerk
3/Resos 92-17 -3-
CITY OF TEMECULA
DESTRUCTION OF OBSOLETE RECORDS POLICY
A. PURPOSe.
To provide the timely destruction of outdated, obsolete and excess documents and records
which are of no use legally or otherwise to the various city departments, in compliance with
Sections 34090 through 34090.7 of the Government Code.
B. POI-ICY
It shall be the policy of the City of Temecula that the City Clerk or her designee shall
routinely destroy - by burning, shredding, erasure, or other permanent method of obliteration -
outdated, obsolete and excess documents and records in accordance with the following
procedures and subject to the following retention schedules. No record may be destroyed unless
specified in this Policy.
C. PROCEDURRq
The City Clerk or her designee shall submit a written request for permission to destroy
the documents, books, receipts, and other records (hereinafter "records") enumerated in this
Policy when:
1. It is determined that the record is obsolete and of no further use to the department
and the record is not needed for, or the subject of discovery of, pending claims or litigation
involving the City.
2. It is determined that the record is eligible for destruction according to the
following Records Retention Schedules and any other criteria for destruction have been complied
with.
3. The City Clerk's office shall submit a written request for destruction to the
department head listing the records to be destroyed, showing the age and type of record and the
applicable retention schedule.
4. Destruction shall not occur until the department head, approves, in writing, the
request for destruction after checking with the City Attorney, as necessary, to verify the
document is not involved in a pending claim or litigation involving the City. The department
head may deny the destruction of any record or condition the destruction on the prior
microf~ming of the record in accordance with Section E of this policy.
3/1~,~o, 92-17 -4-
5. Once permission to destroy has been given, The City Clerk's office shall oversee
and witness the destruction. When destruction has been completed, the date and manner of
destruction and the attestation that the City Clerk or designee witnessed the destruction shall be
listed on the request form. The request for destruction together with the written approval of the
department head shall be maintained in a separate file kept by the City Clerk.
6. Disposal of any records, once destroyed as provided herein, may be made
pursuant to any recycling program or policy of the City.
D. RETi~.NTION SCH~.f~UI.Kq
In compliance with Government Code Sections 340~0 and 34090.5, the following Records
Retention Schedule (Schedule A) has been established to implement and maintain this Policy.
E. VIDF. O AND AUDIO SCI-IF.r}U~
Duplicates of records, less than two years old may be destroyed, if no longer required,
without micwfilming. Video and audio recording mediums are considered duplicate records if
and when the City keeps another record such as written minutes of the event which is recorded.
However, a video medium shall not be destroyed for a period of at least 5 years after the event
recorded thereon.
F. LITIGATION SCHEDULES
These records must be kept for five (5) years or until such time as their relevance to, and
need in pending litigation or claims against the City is resolved through settlement with prejudice
or final court adjudication.
2.
civil lawsuits.
Written claims presented under the Government Tort Claims Liability Act.
Records related to, or involved in, pending criminal investigations and actions or
E. MICROFILMING
Microfling, when authorized in this Policy, shall be performed in compliance with all
of the following conditions:
3/Rs,os 92-17
1. The record, paper, or document is photographed, microphotographed, reproduced
by electronically recorded video images on magnetic surfaces, recorded in the electronic data-
processing system, recorded on optical disk, reproduced on film or any other medium which
does not permit additions, deletions or changes to the original document, or reproduced on film,
optical disk, or any other medium in compliance with the minimum standards or guidelines, or
both, as recommended by the American National Standards Institute or the Association for
Information and Image Management for recording of permanent records or nonpermanent
records, whichever applies.
2. The device used to reproduce the record, paper, or document on film, optical
disk, or any other medium is one which accurately and legibly reproduces the original thereof
in all details and which does not permit additions, deletions or changes to the original document
images.
3. The photographs, microphotographs or other reproductions on film, optical disk
or any other medium are made as accessible for public reference as the original records were.
4. A true copy of archival quality of the film, optical disk, or any other medium
reproductions shall be kept in a safe and separate place for security purposes.
No page of any record, paper or document shall be destroyed in any page cannot be
reproduced on film with full legibility. Every non-reproducible page shall be permanently
preserved in a manner that will afford easy reference.
ANNUAL REVIEW BY CITY ATTORNEY
The City Clerk shall be responsible for requesting an annual review of this Policy by the
City Attorney. This request shall be made through the City Manager.
Pursuant to the requirements of Government Code Section 34090, I hereby give my consent to
the destruction of records under the direction of the City Clerk pursuant to this Policy
City Attorney Date:
City of Temecula
/---
3/Resos 92-17
.Group
:No. ·...
III
IV
V
Vl
VII
VIII
IX
X
XI
XII
XIII
Schedule A
CITY OF TEMECULA RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE
Records affecting time to real property or liens
thereon
Records required to be kept permanently by
statute
Minute, ordinances end resolutions of the
City Council or Boards end Commissions.
Documents with lasdng hietodal,
administrative, legal, fieold, or eases'oh value.
Records which do nut require permanent
espies for store purposes
Correspondence, operational reports end
information upon which City policy has been
established.
Duplicates of V above, when retention is
necessary for reference
Records requiring retention for more then five
years but no more than fifteen years by
statute or administration value,
Duplicates needed for administrative purposes
for five - fifteen years.
All other odginal City records, or instruments,
books or papers that are considered public
documents not included in Groups I through
VIII
Duplicates end other documents not public
records required to be malnteined for
administrative purposes.
Duplicate records requiring retention for
administrative purpose suoh as reference
material for making up budgets, for planning,
end programming.
Reference files. (Copies of documents which
duplicate the record copies filed elsewhere in
the City; documents which require no action
end ere non-record; rough drafts, notes,
feeder reports, end similar working papers
accumulated in preparation of a
communication, study or other document,
end cards, listings, indexes and other papers
used for controlling work).
X 2 P If Micro
X 2 P If Micro
X 2 P If Micro
X 2 P If Micro
X 4
X 2 10
X'. 2
X 2 13
4 yra.
12
2
15
Note: Any item san be
destroyed if two copies
of microfilm done with
one in safe storage and
accomplished properly.
Destruction years only
apply if not on film.
Note: Any item not on
microfilm and subject to
destruction will not be
destroyed without
written permission of
the department head
end the City Attorney.
Note: Regardless of
Office Retention period
as listed, eadier transfer
to the Retrieves Center
is authorized.
X 2 13 15
X 2 1 3
Note: Original council
minutes, ordinances,
resolutions end official
bonds will nut be
destroyed even if
microfilmed.
X X 2 3 5
X 3 3
X 1 1
3/Resoe 92-17 -7-
Continued...
XIV
XV
XVI
Transitory files, including letters of transmitTel
(when nut · public record) suspense copies when
reply has been received, routine requests for
information end publication, tracer letters, feeder
reports, end other duplicates copies no longer
Original documents diopoeable upon occurrence of
an eves or an a~tion (i.e., audit, job completion,
completion of contract, ere.) or upon obsolescence,
supersession, revocltion.
Policy files end reference sets of publications.
XVII
Duplicates or non-record documents required for
administrative needs but destroyable on occurrence
of an event or an setion.
X x
X
X
3
Indef
Indef
3
ledef
Indef
3
Note: Destroy upon supersession or
obsolescence.
3,'Rems 92-17 ..8-
DESCRIPTION OF PFRMANENT RECORDS
Attachment to Schedule "A"
Group I
Records - Affecting Property Title or Liens
Group I documents shall not be subject to destruction, except if micro filming or reproduction
by other medium which does not permit additions, deletions or changes to the original document is performed
in strict accordance with the provisions of Government Code Section 34090.5.
Building and Safety: Utilities: Deeds Parks:
Building Permits Lights Signs Bikeways
Capital Improvements: Water Curbs Landscaping
Plans Power Gutters Right-of-way
Drawings Cablevision Walks Weed Abatement
Checks &Inspection Television Bikeways Striping
Basements Maps: Drainage: Hou sing
Street Names &Numbers Streets Flood Control General Plan:
Liens Light Soil Erosion Amendments
'Condemnations Trees Hydrology Zoning
Assessments Signals Parking
Group H
Group IH
Group IV
A.
B
C
Group V
Records Required to be kept by Statute
Minutes, Ordinances and Resolutions of City Council or Boards and Commissior~'
Announcements, Notices, Affidavits, Agendas, Minutes, Resolutions, Ordinances,
Proclamations, Supporting Exhibits
Documents with lasting administrative, legal, fiscal, historical or research value.
Administrative - Personnel cumulative records, Reviews, Action, Promotions, Time Records,
Leave, CETA, Policy and Procedures, OSHA Inspections, Affirmative Action Program, any like
above.
Fiscal - Audit - Annual and Semi-annual, Monthly Budget AHocations, Appropriations,
Expenditures, Encumbrances, Journals and Ledgers, Inventory, Payroll, Receipts, Collections,
Cash, Check Register, Capital Property, Business License, Fees, Schedules, Grants, Bonds,
Trust Funds, Revenue Sharing, Treasurer's Register.
Historical City Organization Charts, Service Organizations, Chamber of Commerce,
Homeowners' Associations, City Flower/Tree, Teen Centers, Schools, Universities, Press
Releases, Department Staff Summaries, Report and Statistical Analyses.
Bicycle Licenses, Purchase orders and requisitions, Contracts or Agreements, despite a
shorter term provided therein and Entertainment/Special Event Permits
3/Re, sos 92-17
TO: City Clerk
FROM: Gail Zigler,
Office Specialist
DATE: December 22, 1993
SUBJECT: Destruction of Records Request
Attached is e print out of Plot Plans (Retention Type PP) dating from 1974 through
1988. These records have been microfilmed in triplicate with a copy distributed to
the City Clerk's Records Vault, the Planning Department and a copy to the Vault in
San Diego.
The following have reviewed and approved this destruction request.
Pursuant to the requirements of Government Code Section 34090, I hereby give my
consent to the destruction of records under the direction of the City Clerk pursuant
to the City of Temecula's adopted Destruction of Obsolete Records Policy.
Department Heed:
City Attorney:
Date
Scott/F~/~m>df, yc
Date
R:%forms\destruct.rqe
R~ESTY...RRQ61 City of Temmcutm Do¢. Ref ......... 161 hp 1
12/15/1993 D~truction Statul Listing Retention Type... ~ 16:15:~8
Detractlea Date. 12/30/1993
D~. Item Rat. FiLe Reference # Store Nedie
Ref. Date R~. Brief D~cri~ion Type Security CLB~ Storage L~ation - Location Referf
161 03/1~/197~ 1678 PLot PLan ~ 000200011386 FiLm 3821N1AO001
GrQ4F i 161/12~The VauLt
161 ~/15/197~ 1717 PL~ PLan 1717 ~ 000300011397 FiLm 3821H1AO001
Gro~ i 161/12~The VauLt
161 05/1~197~ 1712 PLot PLan 1712 PP 000300011397 FiLm 3821H1AQO01
GroLF ! 161/12~The VauLt
161 11/08/197~ 178~ PLot PL~ 1788 ~ 000300011602 FILl 3821N1AOOO1
Group ! 161/l~/The VauLt
161 01/10/19~ 1~1 PLot PLan 1821 PP 000300011605 FiLm 3821H1AO001
Groqo i 161/120~he VauLt
161 ~/1~19~ 1682 PLot PLm ~ 0~200011391 FiLm 3821H1AOO01
Group I 161/1~/The VauLt
161 05/02/19~ 1~1 PLot PLan ff 0002000113~ FiLm 382INLAY01
Group ! 161/120/The VauLt
161 10/2~/19~ 2117 PLot PLan 2117 PP 00030001¶~20 FiLm 3821H1AO001
Group ] 161/120/The VauLt
161 11/2A/19~ 2159 PLot Ptm 2159 ~ 000300011&~ FiLm 38~1N1AO~1
Group i 161/12Q/The VauLt
161 1~/1Z/19~ Zl~ PLot PLan Zl~ ~ 0003000116Z6 FILm 38Z1M1AO001
GPoup i 161/12~The VauLt
161 05/~5/1976 1~7 PLot PL~ 1~ PP 00030~11~ F~Lm 3821~1A~01
Group ] 161/1ZO/The VauLt
161 06/1~19~ Z619 PLot PLan ~19 PP 000300011631 FiLm 387.1~1A0001
Group ] 161/12Q/The VauLt
161 0~28/19~ 2~99 PLot Pt~ ~ PP 00~00011~33 Fi[m 3821H1A~01
Group ] 161/120/The VauLt
161 ~/2~/19~ 2538 PLot PL~ 2538 PP 00~00011~7 FiLm 3821HIAO001
Group ] 161/120/The VauLt
161 09/~/19~ 25~ PLot PLan 2582 PP 000300011~46 FiLe 382INLAY01
Group ] 161/120/The VauLt
161 09/28/19~ 2539 Ptot PLan ~39 PP 000300011442 Fite 3821H1A~01
Group ] 161/120/The VauLt
161 11/08/19~ 26~0 PLot PLan 26~0 ~ 000300011~9 FiLe 3821H1A~01
Group ! 161/120/The VauLt
161 11/08/1976 265~ PLot PLan ~5~ ~ 000300011~65 Fite 3821~1A0~1
Group [ 161/12~The VauLt
RRDESTY...RR061 CIty of TeB/~UL8 Page
12/15/1993 Destruction $tatuc Lilting 16:15:~8
D/o~-~ item Rat, FILe Refererie # Storage lledia
i = Data Ref. Brief Descri~ion Type Security CLma Storage Lucation Lo~ition Reference
161 11/15/19~ 26~ PLot PLan 266~ ~ 090)00011/,69 FiLm 3821N1AO001
Group I 161/120~he VauLt
161 11/18/1976 2665 PLot PLan 2665 ~ 0903000116~ FILm 3821N1AO001
Group [ 161/120/The VauLt
161 11/~/1976 2~5 PLot PLan 2~5 ~ 000300011657 FILm 3821N1AO001
Group ! 161/1ZO/The VauLt
161 05/25/1977 2811 PLot PLan ~11 ~ 0903000116~ FiLe 3821N1AO001
Group Z 161/120/The VauLt
161 ~/~/1977 3003 PLot PLan 3003 ~ 000300011480 FiLm )821H1AO001
Group ! 161/120/The VauLt
161 0~12/1977 3085 PLot PLan 3085 PP 090300011~85 FiLe 3821H1AO001
Group I 161/120~he VauLt
161 ~/1~1977 3171 PLot PLan 3171 ~ 0903090116~ FiLm 3821N1AO001
Group [ 161/1~/The VauLt
161 ~/13/1977 3216 PLot PLan 3216~ ~ 000300011697 FiLm 3821NIA(X)01
Group ! 161/120/The VauLt
.~ ...............................................................
': ~0/0~1977 3139 PLot PLan 3139 PP 000300011/,88 FiLm 3821N1AO001
Group ! 161/120/The VauLt
161 10/11/1977 3266 PLot PLan 3266 ~ 000300011501 FiLm 3821NIA0901
Group ! 161/120/The VauLt
161 11/23/1977 ~17 PLot PLan 3317 ~ 009300011515 FILe 387.1N1AO001
Group ! 161/120/The VauLt
161 12/16/1977 :~56 PLot PLan ~56 ~ 000300011526 FiLm 3821NIAO001
Group ! 161/1~/The VauLt
161 12/29/1977 7~67 PLot PLan 3~67 ~ 000300011531 FiLm 3821N1AO001
Group ! 161/120/The VauLt
161 01/11/1911 3515A PLot PLan 3515A ~ 0903000115~8 FiLm 3821N1AO001
Group ! 161/120/The VauLt
161 01/12/1911 33~ PLot PLan 33~ PP 000300011509 FILm 3821N1AO001
6~.; ! 161/1ZO/The VauLt
161 01/16/19~ ~ PLot PL~ ~ ~ 09~00011537 FiLm 3821NIAO001
Group I 161/120/The vauLt
161 01/1~19113&99 PLot PLan )~99 ~ 000300011543 FiLm 3821HIAO001
~ Group ! 161/12~The VauLt
161 02/02/1978 33~ PLot PLan 33~ ~ 000300011521 FiLm 3821N1AO001
Group ! 161/120/The VauLt
RRDESTY...RRQ61 City of TeemcuLl Page 3
12/t5/1993 Destruction Status Listing 16:15:68
D~. Item Rat. FILe Reformnee # Storage ledia
Ref. Date Ref. Brief Ducri~ton Type SeN:urity CLass Storage Location Location Refers ~
161 ~/1~1978 ~6Z3 PLot PLan 3623 ~ QOQSOOQ11569 FiLe 3821N1AOQQ1
Group ] 161/12Q/The VauLt
161 ~/11/1978 36~7 PL~ PLan 36/,7 ~ 0003000115~ FiLm 3821N1AO~1
Group [ 161/12~The VauLt
161 ~/~/1978 3795 PLot PLan 3795 PP 00~011580 FILm ~21H1AO001
Group ] 161/120/The VauLt
161 05~1/1978 3603 PLot PLan 3603 ~ 000300011562 FILm 3821H1AO001
Group ] 161/12~The VauLt
161 0~16/1978 3786 PLot PLan 3786 PP 000300011580 FiLm 3821Nl&O001
Group i 161/120/The VauLt
161 07/~/1978 3917 PLot PLan ]917 ~ 00030001159~ FiLm 3821H1AO001
Group ] 161/120~he VauLt
161 0~2~1978 ]918 PLot PLan3918 ~ 000300011606 FiLm 3821H1AO001
Gro~ ] 161/120/The VauLt
161 0~25/1978 3891 PLot PLan 3891 ~ 000300011589 Fits 3821H1AO001
Group ! 161/120/The VauLt
................................................................. ~
161 0~28/1978 3898 PLot PLan 3898 ~ 0003~0115~ FiLm 3821H1AO001 '
Group i 161/120/The VauLt
161 ~/16/1978 39~ PLot PLan 39~ ~ 00~00011609 FiLm 3821N1AO001
Group i 161/120/The VauLt
161 10/19/1978 ~4)97 PLat PLan 6~7 ~ ~030001170~ FiLm 3821H1AO001
Group i 161/120/The VauLt
161 12/01/1978 6016 PLat PLan 6016 ~ 000300011616 FILm 3821NIAO001
Group ~ 161/120/The VauLt
161 12/01/1978 6139 PLat PLan 6139 ~ 000300011686 FiLe 3821N1AO001
Group i 161/120/The'VauLt
161 12/05/1978 60~ PLat PLan 6028 ~ 000300011622 FiLm 3821N1AO001
Group i 161/120/The VauLt
161 12/~/1978 ~0~ PLat PLan 60~ ~ 000300011628 FiLm 3821NIAO001
Group ! 161/120/The VauLt
161 12/13/1978 6181 PLat PLan 6181 ~ 000300011695 FILm 3821MIAO001
Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 01/M/19~ &l~ PLot PLan 6125 ~ 000300011~1 FiLe 3821N1AO001
Group I 161/120/The VauLt
161 01/~/1979 6a7 PLot PLan 6287 PP QQQSOQQ11733 FiLe ~821MIAQQQ1
Group I t61/120~he VauLt
RItDESTY...RR061 City of Tamecute Page &
12/15/1993 Destruction Status Listing 16:15:/,8
Dg;__ item R~. File Reference # Storage l4edte
K i Date Ref. grief Descri~ion Type Security CL.s Store Location Location Reference
161 02/~/19~ 6~5 PLot PLan 6~5 ~ QQQ)OQ011~9 FILm 3821N1AO01
Group I 161/12Q/The Vault
161 03/~/1979 4363 PLot PLan 4363 PP 000300011743 Film 3821N1AO001
Group ! 161/120/The Vault
161 03/0~19~ 41~ PLot PLan 41~ ~ 00~011~9 File 3821NIAO~l
Group ! 161/120/The Vault
161 ~/12/1979 4)87 Plot Plan 4387 PP ~0~11~0 FILm 3821H1AO001
Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 ~/~/19~ ~97 PLat PLan 4&97 ~ 00030001175 Film 3821N1AO001
Group I 161/1~/The Vault
161 ~/2~19~ 45~ PLot PLan 45~ ~ 000)00011767 Film )821NIAO001
Group i 161/1~/The Vault
161 ~/26/19~ 4~2 PLot Plan 4~2 PP OM)M011~6 Film )821NIAO001
Group [ 161/120/The Vault
161 08/1~1979 4786 PLot PLan 4786 ~ ~00011~1 Film )821N1AO001
Group [ 161/120/The Vault
.y---- ...............................................................
1 ~9/05/1979 4~2 Plot Plan 4~2 ~ 000300011782 Film ~821NIAO001
Group i 161/120/The Vault
161 09/1~1979 41~ Plot Plan 41H ~ ~0)00011669 Film )821N1AO001
Group i 161/120/The Vault
161 ~/2~19~ 4145 Plot Plan ~145 ~ ~07~0011691 Film )821H1AO001
Group i 161/12~The Vault
161 11/01/19~ A8~8 PLot PLan AS&8 PP 000300011~5 File 3821N1AO001
Group i 161/1ZO/The Vault
161 11/02/19~ 4971 PLot PLan 4971 ~ ~00011~9 Film 3821NIAO001
Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 11/0~19~ 4785 Plot PLan 4785 ~ 000300011832 Film 3821H1AO001
Group i 161/120/The Vault
161 12/~/19~ 5056 PLot PLan 5056 ~ 000300011862 Film 3821N1AO001
Group i 161/120/The Vault
161 12/26/19~ 45~ PLot PLan 45~ ~ ~0300011767 Film 3821N1AO001
Group i 161/120/The Vault
161 01/1A/1980 &896 PLot PLan 4~96 ~ 00030001185~ FIlm 3821NIAO~1
/"' Group i 161/120/The Vault
161 01/16/19~ 58A9 PLot PLan 5~9 ~ 000300012026 Film 3821N1AO001
Gro~ I 161/120~he Vault
RRDESTY...RR061 City of Tamecute Pap 5
12/15/1FF3 Destruction Statue Lilting 16:15:68
D~. Item Rat. FiLe Reference # SIlage NKlia
Ref. Bate R~. Brief Description Type SKwtty Ctao Storage Location Location Refers ~'~
161 01/26/1960 68~ PLot PLan 68~ ~ 000300011~2 FiLm 3821N1AO001
Group i 161/120/The VauLt
161 01~1/1960 A2~ PLot PLan A2~ ~ 000300011710 FiLm 3821NIAO001
Group ! 161/120~he VauLt
161 02/21/1~80 50~ PLot PLan 50~ ~ 00~0001t867 FiLm 3821H1AO001
Group Z 161/120/The VauLt
161 02/~/1980 5229 PLot PLan 5229 ~ 000300011881 Fits 3821N1AO001
Group t 161/120/The VauLt
161 ~/11/198) &138 PLot PLan &138 PP 00030~116~ FiLm 3821H1AO001
Group I 161/120/The VauLt
161 ~/05/1980 5~7 PLot PLan 5~7 ~ 00030001188& FILm 38ZlN1AO001
Group i 161/120/The VauLt
161 ~/08/1980 5260 PLot PLan 5260 ~ 000300011891 FiLm 3821H1AO001
Group ] 161/120/The VauLt
161 ~/05/1980 5)~ PLot PLan 53~ ~ 00~011913 FiLm 3821H1AO001
Group I 161/120/The VauLt
................................................................. ~
161 0~22/1980 5615 PLot PLan 5615 ~ 000300011~5 Fits 3821HIAO001 ', ~
Group Z 161/1201The Vault
161 0~2A/1980 55&3 PLot PLan 5543 ~ 0~3000119~ FiLm 3821.1AQQ01
Group Z 161/12Q/The VAuLt
161 ~/ZO/19~ 5~ PLot PLan 5622 ~ 00~011906 FiLm )BZl.IAOOOl
Group ! 161/120/The VauLt
161 B/2~1960 5663 PLot PLan 5663 ~ 00~011965 FiLm 3821H1AO001
Group i 161/120/The VauLt
161 0~15/19~ 5719 PLot PLan 5719 ~ OOQ3QQQll9?? FiLm )821N1AQOQ1
Group i 161/120/The VAuLt
161 10/16/1980 559? PLot PLan 559? ~ 0003000119~0 FiLm 3821.1A0001
Group i 161/120~ VauLt
161 10/22/1980 5O85 PLot PLan 5O85 PP 000~)00118~ FiLm 3821N1AO001
Group i 161/12Q/The VauLt
161 10/2~1980 ~50 PLot PLan 5~0 ~ 00~00011~7 FiLm 3821H1AO001
Group I 161/12Q/The VauLt
161 11/1~1980 5~63 PLot PLan 5463 ~ 0~300011~1 FiLm 3821.1A0001
Group ! 161/1ZO/The VauLt
161 12/05/1980 5596 PLot PLan 5598 ~ 000300011~7 FiLm 3821N1AO001
Group I 161/12Q/The VauLt
RRDESTY...RR061 City of Ternscuts Page 6
12/15/1993 Destruction Btatul Listing 16:15:68
D~r,-, item Rat. FiLe Reference # Storage Nedia
~ Date Ref. Brief Descri~ion Type S~urity CLass Storage L~ation LoomLion Reference
161 12/05/1980 5666 PLot PLan 5664 ~' O6~000119~ FiLm 2821H1AO001
Group I 161/120/The VauLt
161 12/05/1980 5~5 PLot PLan 5~5 ~ 000300011960 FiLm 3821N1AO001
Group [ 161/120~ha VauLt
161 12/11/1960 5783 PLot PLan 5783 ~ O603002005 FiLm 3821N1AO001
Group I 161/120/The VauLt
161 01/~/1981 5920 PLot PLan 5~0 PP O60~000159~ FiLm 3821N1AO001
Group ] 161/120/The VauLt
161 02/02/1981 5988 PLot PLan 5988 ~ 000300012081 FiLm 3821NIAO001
Group I 161/120/The VauLt
161 02/20/1981 5281 PLot PLan 5281 ~ 000300011898 FiLe 3821NIAO001
Group ] 161/120/The VauLt
161 02/21/1981 185 PLot PLan 1~5 ~ 000300011410 FiLm 3821N1AO001
Group [ 161/120/The VauLt
161 03/13/1981 55~ PLot PLan 55~ ~ 0O6300011933 Fits 3821M1AO001
Group [ 161/120/The VauLt
,~--- ...............................................................
~ J3/13/1981 5776 PLot PLan 5776 ~ 000300011992 FiLm 3821N1AO001
Group % 161/1ZO/The VauLt
161 ~/13/1981 5937 PLot PLan 5937 ~ O60300012~0 FiLm 3821M1AO001
Group i 161/120~he VauLt
161 ~/13/1981 5969 PLot PLan 5969 PP O6~00012050 FiLm 3821N1AO001
Group I 161/120/The VauLt
161 B/1~1981 60~ PLot PLan 6076 PP 000300012100 Fi Lm 3821N1AO001
Grcqo i 161/120/The VauLt
161 ~/2~1981 6131 PLot PLan 6131 PP 0003 FiLm 3821~1^__a001
Group ! 1611128/The VauLt
161 ~0/1981 6116 PLot PLan 6116 ~ O603 FiLm 3821N1AO(X)1
Gro~ [ 161/12Q/The VauLt
161 ~/08/1981 6003 PLot PLan 6(X)3 ~ O603QQQ12086 Fi Lm 3821N1AOO61
Group ! 161/120/The VauLt
161 ~/12/1981 5983 PLot PLan 5983 PP 000300O12O61 FiLm 3821.1AO601
Group i 161/1ZO/The VauLt
161 0~1~1981 6118 PLot PLan 6118 ~ 0003 FiLm 2821N1AO601
~ Group Z 161/12Q/The VauLt
161 07/1~1981 6191 PLot PLan 6191 ~ 00O3 FiLm 3821.1AOOO1
Group i 161/1~he VauLt
RIU)ESTY...RR~I City of TeamcaLm P~le ?
12/15/1993 Destructiofi Status Lietl~ 16:15:~8
D~. Item Ret. FiLe Reference # Storage Nedis
Ref. Date Ref. Brief D.cri~ton Type Security CLass store Location Location Befer~
161 0~B/1981 6030 PLot PLan 6030 PP 000300012095 FiLm 3821N1AO001
Group I 161/120~he VauLt
161 ~/12/1981 61~ PL~ PLan 6183 ~ 00(5 Fits ~821N1AOO01
Grc&F ! 161/120/The VauLt
161 ~/19/1981 63H PLot PLan ~58 ~ 0003 FiLm 3821H1AO001
Group i 161/120/The VauLt
161 ~/~/1981 6323 PLot PLan 63~ PP ~ Ft LB 3821H1AO001
Group i 161/12~The VauLt
161 ~/31/19616371 PLot PLan 6371 PP 0003 FiLm )a21N1AO001
Group ! 161/120/The VauLt
161 ~0/1981 ~¶6 PLot PLan ~16 PP 0003 FiLm 3821H1AO001
Group i 161/120/The VauLt
161 10/05/1961 6~ PLot PLan 6i~22 PP 0003 FiLm 3821N1AO001
Group i 161/120/The VauLt
161 11/13/198163~ PLot PLan 6320 ~ 00~ FiLm )821H1AO001
Group ! 161/120/The VauLt
.................................................................
161 11/13/198163~ PLot PLan 6378 ~ ~ FiLm 3821H1AO001
Group ! 161/120/The VauLt
161 11/1)/19816380 PLot PLan 6380 PP 00~ FiLm 3821H1AO001
Group i 161/120/The VauLt
161 12/1~/1981 ~13 PLot PLan 6513 PP 00~ FiLm 3821N1AO001
Group [ 161/12~The VauLt
161 1~/16/198163~ PLot PLan 63~ PP 00~ film 3821N1AO001
Group ! 161/120/The VauLt
161 12~0/1981 ~51 PLot PLan ~51 ~ 00~ FiLm 3821N1AO001
Group ! 161/120~he VauLt
161 01/15/1982 ~56 PLot PLan ~56 PP 00~ FiLm 3821N1AO001
Group ! 161/l~/The VauLt
161 02/11/1982 6326 PLot PLan6326 PP 0003 FiLm 3821N1AO001
Group ! 161/120/The VauLt
161 02/12/1982 6806 PLot PLan G SO6 ~ 000) FiLm 3821H1AO001
Group ! 161/120/The VauLt
161 ~/01/1982 ~11 PLot PLan 6311 PP 0003 FiLm 3821N1AOOOl
Group ! 161/120/The VauLt
161 ~/~/1962 6267 PLot PLan 6267 ~ 0003 FiLm 3821N1AO001
6ro4F I 161/120/The VauLt
RRDESTY...RR061 City of Teemcull Page 8.
12/15/1993 Destruction Statue Listing 16:15:~8
D/~-~ Ztem Rat. File Reference # STorage Nedis
~ DmTe lef. Brief Description Type Security CLass Storage Location Location Reference
161 ~/08/1982 5815 PLat PLan 5815 PP 000300012012 Film 3821N1AOO01
Group ! 161/120/The Vault
161 0612611982 671Q PLot PLan 6770 PP QQQ3 Film 3821N1AQQ01
Group Z 161/120/The Vault
161 07/16/1982 6272 PLot PLan 6272 PP OQ03 Film $B21.1AOOO1
Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 08/03/1982 6826 PLat PLan 6826 PP 0003 Film 3821H1AO001
Group i 161/120/The Vault
161 08/24/1982 6823 PLot PLan 6823 PP 0003 film 3821H1AO001
Group ] 161/120/The Vault
161 08/30/1982 --&J~_2 PLot PLan 6862 PP 0003 Film 3821HIAO001
Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 09/02/1982 6867 PLot PLan 6867 PP 0003 Film 3821H1AO001
Group ! 161/120/The Vault
161 10/31/1982 6937 PLot PLan 6937 PP 000~ Film 3821H1AO001
Group ] 161/1ZO/The Vault
./-- ...............................................................
~ dl/1~1982 6951 PLot PLan 6951 PP 0003 Film ~821N1AQO01
Group % 161/120/The Vault
161 12/1~1982 6988 PLot PLan 6988 PP 0003 Film 3821HIAO001
Group Z 161/120/The Vault
161 01/05/1983 69~2 PLot PLan 69/,2 PP 0003 Film 3821N1AO001
Group i 161/120/The Vault
161 01/06/1983 6812 Plot Plan 6812 PP 0003 Film 3821H1AO001
Group Z 161/120/The Vault
161 01/17/1983 ?033 PLot PLan ?033 PP 0003 Film 3821N1AOO01
Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 01/18/1983 7018 PLot PLan 7018 PP Q0(23 Film 3821N1AQ(X)1
Group I 161/12Q/The Vault
161 01/19/1983 7026 PLot PLan 7024 PP 0003 Film :3821NIAO001
Group ! 161/120/The Vault
161 03/01/1983 ?067 PLot PLan ~7 PP QQ03 Film 3821N1AO(01
Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 03/28/1983 7091 PLot PLan 7091 PP 0(03 Film 3821N1AQ(X)1
/" Group I 161112Q/The Vault
161 ~/2Z/1983 1028 PLot PLan 7028 PP 0003 Film 3821N1AO001
Group I 1611120/The Veult
RRDESTY...RR061 City of Teamcute Pege 9
12/15/1993 Destruction Status Listing 16:15:&8
D~. ]tam Rat. Fits Reference # Stor~e NKlia
Ref. Date Ref. Brief Description Type Securt~ CLass Storage L~ation Location Refers ~'~
161 05/2~19~ 7176 Plot PLan 7176 PP 0003 FILm 3821HIAO001
Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 06/20/t983 7213 PLot PLan 7213 ~ 0003 FILm 3821H1AO001
Group [ 161/120/The Vault
161 ~/20/1963 7214 PLot PLan 7214 ~ 0003 FILm 3821H1AO001
Group [ 161/1ZO/The Vault
161 06/~/1983 7222 PLot PLan 72~ ~ 0003 Film 3821H1AO001
Group Z 161/120/The Vault
161 ~/~/1983 7230 PLot Plan 7230 ~ 0003 Ft Lm 3821H1AO001
Group ! 161/12~The Vault
161 0~/19~3 71~ PLot PLan 71~ ~ 0003 Film 3821H1AO001
Group i 161/120/The Vault
161 0~1~1983 7255 PLot PLan 7255 ~ 0003 Film 3821H1AO001
Group ] 161/120/The Vault
161 ~/05/1983 77.81 PLot PLan 7281 ~. O00) Film 3821H1AO001
Group I 161/120/The Vault
................................................................ ~
161 09/~/1983 ~,'~0, Plot PLan ~,~, PP 00~ Film 3821H1AOO01
Group Z 161/120/The Vault
161 ~/~/1983 7262 PLot PLan 72~ PP 0003 Film )aZlNIAO001
Group ! 161/12Q/The Vault
161 09/15/1993 ~71 PLot PLan ~71 ~ 0003 Film 3821H1AO001
Group i 161/120/The Vault
161 ~/~/1983 7212 PLot PLan 7212 ~ 0003 Fits )821N1AO001
Group i 161/120/The Vault
161 10/~/1983 ~ Plot PLan 73~ ~ 00~ Film 3821H1AO001
Group Z 161/120/The.Vault
161 10/21/1983 7291 PLot Plan 7291 ~ 00~ Film 3821H1AO001
Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 10/21/1983 7292 PLot PLan 7292 ~ ~ Film 3821H1AO001
Group I 161/l~/The Vault
161 11/16/1983 ~11 Plot PLan ~11 PP 0003 Fits 3821N1AO001
Group i 161/120/The Vault
161 11/18/1983 ~ PLot Plan ~ PP 0003 Fits 3821N1AO001
Group i 161/120/The Vault
161 12/15/1963 7453 PLot PLan ~53 ~ QQ03 Film 3821N1AQQ01
Group ! 161/12Q/The Vault
RIIDESTY...RR061 City of TamecuLl Page 10
12/15/1993 Destruction Status Liatin~ 16:15:/~
]tee Rat. FiLe Reference # Storage Nedi8
Date Ref. Brief Description Type Security CLass Store L~atton L~etion Reference
161 12~0/1963 7390 PLot PLan 7390 ~ OOQ3 FiLm :3821HIAOQ01
Group I 161/120/The VauLt
161 01/~/1986 7666 PLot PLan 7666 PP 0003 FiLm 3821NIAO001
Group I 161/120/The VauLt
161 01/28/19~ 7660 PLot PLan 7660 ~ 0003 FiLm 3821N1AN01
Group I 161/120/The VauLt
161 03/~/1984 ~08 PLot PLan ~08 PP 0003 FiLm 3821N1AO001
GrcN4~ ! 161/120/The VauLt
161 ~/24/1986 ?~3 PLot PLan ?~3 PP OQQ3 FiLm 3821.lACXX)l
Group ! 161/120/The VauLt
161 05/25/1986 76~ PLot PLan 76~ PP 0O03 FiLm 3821.1AQ001
Group i 161/120~he VauLt
161 05/25/198~ ~14 PLot PLan 7814 PP Q(X)3 FiLm 3821N1AQOQ1
Group I 161/120/The VauLt
161 ~/29/1984 ~49 PLat PLan 75/,9 ~. 0003 FiLm 3821N1AO001
Group ! 161/120/The VauLt
- ~ ...............................................................
1~ ~02/1984 7897 PLot PLan 7897 PP 00~ FiLm 3821N1AO001
Group Z 161/12~The VauLt
161 0~05/1984 7796 PLot PLan 7796 PP 00~ FiLm 38~lN1AO001
Group ! 161/120/The VauLt
161 0~/19~ 7~5 PLot PLan ~35 PP ~6 FiLm 3821N1AO001
Group I 161/120/The VauLt
161 0~/1984 7896 PLot PLan 7896 PP 0~3 Fi Lm 3821NtAO001
Group i 161/120/The VauLt
161 0~11/1966 ~89 PLot PLan ~ ~ 0003 FiLm 3821N1AO001
Group I 161/120/The VauLt
161 0~1)/19~ ~87 PLot PLan ~87 PP 0003 FiLm 3821NIAO001
Group I 161/120/The VauLt
161 0~1~1986 ~27 PLot PL~ ~27 ~ 0003 FiLm 3821N1AO001
Grc~4~ i 161/120~he VauLt
161 0~2Q/1986 7815 PLot PLan 7815 PP Q(X)3 FiLm 3821H1AQ(X)1
Group ! 161/1ZO/The VauLt
161 M~l/1984 786? PLot PLan 786? PP QQQ3 FiLm 3821mAOOO1
~ Group Z 161/12Q/The VauLt
161 ~/10/19~ 7832 PLot PLan 7832 PP QOQ3 FiLm 3821NIAOOO1
Group I 161/120/The VauLt
RIIDESTY...RR061 City of TeascaLa Page 11
12/15/1993 Destruction Btatul 'LiE!trig 16:15:48
D~. Item Rat. FiLe Reference # Storage 14edla
Ref. Date Ref. Brief Descri~ion Type Security Ct.a Storage Location Location Refere
16109/14/198~ 7661 PLot PLan 7661 PP 0003 FiLm 3821.1A0001
Group i] 161/120/The VauLt
16109/14/198~ 78~ PLot PLan 78~ ~ O(X)3 Film 3821.1A0001
Group ! 161/12Q/The VauLt
16109/1~1984 8052 PLot PLan 8052 PP QOQ3 Ft Lm 3821.1A0001
Group ! 161/12~The VauLt
16109/2~19~ 7892 PLot PLan 7892 ~ QOQ3 FiLm 3821NtAQQQ1
Group ! 161/12Q/The VauLt
161 09/28/1964 8094 PLot PLan 809~ ~ ~ FiLm 3821M1AOOO1
Group ! 161/12Q/The V~uLt
161 10/~/198~ 8082 PLot PLan 8C)~2 PP QQ~ FiLm 3821N1AOOOl
Group ! 161/12Q/The VmJLt
161 10/1~198~ 8119 PLot PLan 8119 PP ~ FiLm 3821.1AOOOl
Groul~ ! 161/12Q/The VauLt
161 1Q/19/1984 8133 PLot PLan 8133 PP QOQ3 FiLm 3821N1AOO01
Group ! 161/1tO/The VauLt
161 10/~/198~ 8026 PLot PLan 8026 ~ QO~ FiLm 3821M1AOOO1
Group i 161/1~he VauLt
161 10/26/198~ 81~ PLot PLan 8154 PP 0003 FiLm 3821H1AOQOl
Group z 161/120~he VauLt
161 11/13/1984 8059 PLot PLan 8059 ~ QOC)3 FiLm 3821.1A0001
Group ! 161/12Q/The VauLt
161 11/15/198~ 8198 PLot PLan 8198 PP QQQ3 FiLm 3821N1AOOO1
Group ! 161/120/The VauLt
161 12/1~/198~ ~38 PLot PLan 8038 PP OQ~ FiLm 3821NIAOOO1
Group ! 161/120/The Vault
161 12/14/1984 8112 PLot PLan 8112 PP QQ~ FiLm 3821N1AQQQ1
Group Z 161/12Q/The VauLt
161 01/29/1985 .?T PLot PLan ~?? PP OO~ FiLm 3821N1A(XX)1
Group [ 161/1~he VauLt
161 02/05/1985 8326 PLot PLan g26 PP QQ~ FiLm 3821N1AOOOl
Group Z 161/120/The VauLt
161 02/~/1985 8149 PLot PLan 8149 ~ QOQ3 FiLm 3821N1AOO01
Group ! 161/12Q/The VauLt
161 02/~/1985 8252 PLot PLan 8252 PP QQ03 FiLm 3821N1AQO01
Group i 161/120~he VauLt
RRDESTY...RR061 City of Temecuta Page 12
12/15/1993 Destrim:Lion Status' Liatfnl 16:15:/,8
D~ [tm Rat. FiLe Reference # StorsgeNedia
i ~ Data Ref. Brief Descri~im T~e Security CLass Storage L~itim L~ltim R~arence
161 02/28/1985 g13 PLat PL~ g13 ~ 0063 FiLm 3821NIAQQQ1
Group Z 161/120~he V~Lt
161 ~1~/1985 8206 PLat Ptm 8208 ~ QQQ3 FiLm 3821.1A0001
Group i 161/12Q/The VauLt
161 ~/12/1985 ~Q5 PLot PL~ ~05 PP QO~ FiLm 3821N1AOO01
Group I 161/l~/The VauLt
161 ~/22/1985 ~81 PLot PL~ 8281 ~ OOQ3 FiLm 3821N1AQQ01
Group ! 161/12Q/The V~Lt
161 ~/02/1~5 8298 PLot PL~ 8292 ~ 0O03 FiLm 3821N1AOOOl
Group ! 161/12Q/The V~Lt
161 ~/~/1~5 8~67 PLot PL~ 8A62 ~ QOQ$ FiLm 3821N1AQQQ1
Group ! 161/12Q/The V~Lt
161 ~/~/1~5 8~65 PLot PLan 8~65 PP OQQ3 FiLm 3821H1AOOOl
Group ! 161/l~/The VauLt
161 ~/~/1985 ~ PLot PLm ~ ~ QO03 FiLm 3821N1AQQQ1
Group i 161/12Q/The VauLt
./~- ...............................................................
~ ~/1~1985 ~ PLot PL~ ~ ~ QOQ3 Fi Lm 3821.1A0001
Group ! 161/12Q/The VauLt
161 ~/1~1~5 8366 PLot PL~ 8366 ~ OQQ3 FiLm 3821.lAQQQ1
Group ~ ' 161/12Q/The VauLt
161 ~/~/1~5 ~ PLot PLan ~ ~ 0003 FiLm 3821NIAOOO1
Group ! 161/12~The VauLt
161 05/02/1~5 ~38 PLot PL~ 8538 ~ QOQ~ FiLm 3821NIAOOO1
Groq~ ! 161/1~he vault
161 05/03/1~5 E19 PLot PLm ~19 ~ 0003 FiLm 3821.1A0001
Group ! 161/120~he VauLt
161 05/~/1~5 ~27 PLot PL~ ~27 ~ 000] FiLm 3821H1AO001
Group ] 161/120/The VauLt
161 05/~/1985 836~ PLot PLm 836~ ~ QQQ3 FiLm 3821N1AQOQ1
Group i 161/120~he VauLt
161 ~/~/1985 8365 PLot PLan 8365 ~ QQQ3 FiLm 3821.1A0001
Group i 161/l~/The VauLt
161 05/1~1985 ~17 PLot PL~ ~17 ~ 0003 FiLm 3821N1AO001
~ Group ] 161/120/The VauLt
161 05/~/1~5 8586 PLot PL~ ~ ~ OOIX FiLm 3821N1AO001
Group ] 161/120/The VauLt
RitDESTY...RR061 City of TamecaLm Page 13
12/15/199) Destruction Status Listing 16:15:&8
DK. Item R~. FiLe Reference # Storage 14edja
Ref. Date Ref, Brief Description Type Security CLass Storage Location Location Refere ~'~
161 05/31/1965 8392 PLot PLan 8392 ~ QQ03 FiLm 3821NIAQQ01
Grot4~ i 161/120/The VauLt
161 05~1/1985 8420 PLot PLan 84~ PP QQQ3 FiLm 3821.1AOOO1
Group ! 161112Q/The VauLt
161 ~/28/1985 8435 PLot PLan 8435 ~ 00~ FiLm )821N1AO001
Group ! 161/1ZO/The VauLt
161 ~/28/1985 84~ PLot PLan 8472 PP 0003 FiLm :3821N1AO001
Group ! 161/120/The VauLt
161 ~/Z~1985 8496 PLot PLan 8496 ~ 0003 FiLm 3821N1AO001
Group [ 161/1~/The VauLt
161 ~/28/1985 ~ PLot PLan 8500 ~ 0003 FiLm :382INLAY01
Group ! 161/120/The VauLt
161 0~1~1985 8437 PLot PLan 8437 PP , QOQ3 FiLm 3821HIA~01
Group ! 161/12Q/The VauLt
161 0~12/1985 ~26 PLot PLan 85~ ~ O00& FiLm 3821H1AX)OQ1
Group ! 161/120/The VauLt
161 0~1~1985 8489 PLot PLan 8489 PP QO03 FiLm 3821HIAQ(X)l
GrcxJp i 161/120/The VauLt
161 0~24/1985 8685 PLot PLan 8685 PP QQ~ FiLm 3821H1A~Q1
Group i 161/120/The VauLt
161 o~z6/1985 8425 PLot PLan 8425 ~ QO~ FiLm 3821N1AOO01
Group I 161/120/The VauLt
161 0~/1985 ~ PLot PLan 85~ PP 0(0 FiLm 3821N1AOO01
Gro4Jp i 161/12Q/The VauLt
161 08/~/1985 8433 PLot PLan 8433 ~ Q~3 FiLm 3821NIAOOO1
Group ! 161/12Q/The VauLt
161 0~/1985 8784 PLot PLan 878~ PP 0084 FiLm 3821N1AOOO1
Group ! 161/12Q/The VauLt
161 ~/~/1985 8782 PLot PLan 8782 ~ QQ84 FiLm 3821NIAOOO1
Group i 161/12Q/The VauLt
161 09/09/1985 8788 PLot PLan 8788 ~ 00~ Fi Lm 3821N1AQQ01
Group ! 161/120/The VauLt
161 ~/1Q/lga5 8793 PLot PLan 8793 ~ IX)IX FiLm 3821N1AQQ01
Group i 161/1~/The VauLt ~
161 ~/13/1985 843& PLot PLan 84~ ~ QQQ3 FiLm 3821N1AOOOl
Group i 161/120nhe VauLt
RRDESTY...RR061 City of Teemcuts Page
12/15/1993 Destruction Status Lilting 16:15:/~B
~ item Ret. File Reference # Storage Nedi8
Date Ref. Brief Description Type Security CLass Storage Location Location Reference
161 10/02/1985 88~3 PLot PLan 88~3 PP OQ(O Film 3821H1AOQ01
Group ! 161/120/The Vault
161 10/24/1985 87/~ PLot PLan 874~ PP O0(X Film 3821H1AO001
Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 10/24/1985 ooz~.~. PLot PLan PP OOIX Film 3821M1AO001
Group I 161/12Q/The Vault
161 11/06/1985 8797 PLot PLan 8797 PP 000~ Film 3821M1AO001
Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 11/13/1985 8810 PLot PLan 8810 PP 000/, Film 3821N1AO001
Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 11/13/1985 8891 PLot PLan 8891 PP 00~ Film 3821H1AO001
Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 11/27/1985 8759 PLot PLan 8759 PP 0004 Film 3821H1AO001
Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 12/02/1985 8758 PLot PLan 8758 PP 000~ Film 3821H1AO001
Group ! 161/120/The Vault
./~-- ...............................................................
12/05/1985 8819 PLot PLan 8819 PP O0(X Film 3821H1AOOO1
Group ] 161/120/The Vault
161 12/06/1985 86~2 PLot PLan 86AZ PP 000~ Film ]821H1AOO01
Group Z 161/120/The Vault
161 12/06/1985 ~ PLot PLan 88~ PP OOO~ Film 3821N1AOO01
Group Z 161/lZO/The Vault
161 12/16/1985 8091 PLot PLan 8091 PP OQ03 Film ~821.1A0001
Group ] 161/120/The Vault
161 12/20/1985 8738 PLot PLan 8?38 PP QQ(X Film 3821M1AOOO1
Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 12/20/1985 8955 PLot PLan 8955 PP 000~ Film 3821H1AO001
Group [ 161/120/The Vault
161 12/31/1985 8963 PLot Plan 8963 PP OO~ Film 3821H1AQQ01
Group i 161/120/The Vault
161 01/06/1986 898~ PLot PLan 898~ PP 0004 Film 3821H1AO001
Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 01/08/1986 88&t Plot PLan PP 000~ Film ~821H1AO001
/~ Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 01/24/1986 8632 PLot PLan 8632 PP 0004, FiLm 3821H1AO001
Group I 161/120/The Vault
RRDESTY...RR061 City ~ TemecuLs Page 15
12/15/1FFJ Destruction Status Listing 16:15:&8
D~. Item Bet. File.Reference # Storage Nedis
Ref. Date lef. Brief Description Type Security CLass Storage Location Location Refer~
161 01/24/198~ 8853 PLot PLan PP O00& Film 3821NIAO001
Group i 161/120/The Vault
161 01/24/1~8~ 8859 PLot PLan 8859 PP 000~ Film 3821N1AO001
Group ! 161/1!0/The Vault
161 01/)1/1~66 ~ PLot PLan ~00~ PP 000~ Film :H21H1AO001
Group ! 161/120/The Vault
161 02/05/1~66 ~067 PLot PLan ~067 PP O00& Film )821H1AO001
Group ] 161/120/The VauLt
161 02/06/1986 gO21 PLot PLan ~021 PP 00~ Film 3821H1AO001
Group ! 161/120/The Vault
161 02/07/1~86 87(~ PLot PLan 8769 PP 0004 Film )821H1AO001
Group ] 161/120/The Vault
161 02/14/lf66 8742 PLot PLan 8742 PP O00& Film H21H1AO001
Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 02/27/1~86 90~8 PLot PLan ~ PP' O00& FILm )821H1AO001.
Group [ 161/120/The Vault
................................................................. ~-,
161 0]/07/1986 88/,1 PLot PLan PP 0004 Film ~821N1AO001 .'
Group ! 161/120/The Vault
161 0)/10/1~i6 90(i PLot PLan ~)66 PP 0004 Film ~821N1AO001
Group ] 161/120/The Vault
161 0)/21/1986 8207 PLot PLan 8207 PP 000) Film )821H1AO001
Group ] 161/1!0/The Vault
161 0]/21/1~86 8~0 PLot PLan 89)0 PP 0004 Film ~8~1H1AO00
Group ! 161/120/The Vault
161 03/21/1~8~ 8f~1 PLot PLan 8931 PP 0004 Film ]821H1AO001
Group ! 161/120/The Vault
161 0]/21/lg86 8fJ2 PLot PLan 8F~2 PP O00& Film ~821H1AO001
Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 03/21/1~86 8~1 PLot PLan 8~1 PP O00& Film ~821H1AO001
Group ! 161/120/The Vault
161 ~/04/1~8t5 ~ PLot PLan ~)89 PP O00& Film ]821H1AO001
Group ! 161/120/The Vault
161 ~/11/lg96 8W~ PLot PLan 8~ PP 00~ Film )821H1AO001
Group ! 161/120/The Vault
161 05/02/lg96 912~ PLot PLan 912~ PP 00~ Film 3821HIAO001
Group ! 161/1!0/The Vault
RRDESTY...RR061 City of Te~ecuts Page 16
12/15/1~3 Destruction Ststus Listing 16:15:~8
D~-- item .Rat. File Reference # Storsgel4edis
I , Date Ref. Brief Description Type Security CLass Storage Location Location Reference
161 05/06/1986 9192 PLot PLan 9192 PP 000/~ Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 05/07/1986 9150 PLot PLan 9150 PP 0004 Film 3821N1A0001
6roup ! 161/120/The Vault
161 05/08/1986 5886 PLot PLan 5886 PP 000300012077 Film 3821N1AO001
Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 05/08/1986 9138 PLot PLan 9138 PP 000/, Film 3821N1AO001
3821~1A0001 161/120/The Vault
161 05/09/1986 894/, PLot PLan 89/,A PP 0004 Film 3821N1AO001
Group i 161/120/The Vault
161 05/13/1986 914~ PLot PLan 91/,4 PP 0004 Film 3821N1AO001
Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 05/22/1986 9151 PLot PLan 9151 PP 0004 Film 3821N1AO001
6roup Z 161/120/The Vault
161 05/23/1986 9034 PLot PLan 9034 PP 0004 Film 3821NIAO001
Group i 161/120/The Vault
,/~ ...............................................................
~ J5/23/1986 9160 PLot PLan 9160 PP 0004 File 3821N1AO001
Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 05/2~1986 9161 PLot PLan 9161 PP 0004 Film 3821N1AO001
Group L 161/120rrhe Vault
161 06/05/1986 9166 PLot PLan 9166 PP 0004 Film 3821N1AO001
Group Z 161/120/The Vault
161 06/09/1986 9196 PLot PLan 9196 PP 0004 film 3821N1AO001
Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 06/16/1986 3516 PLot PLan 3516 PP 000300011556 Film 38ZlHlAO001
Group ] 161/120/The Vault
161 06/20/1986 9130 PLot PLan 9130 PP 0004 Film 3821N1AO001
Group ! 161/120/The Vault
161 06/20/1986 9210 PLot PLan 9210 PP 000/, Fttm 3821MIAO001
Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 06/20/1986 9211 PLot PLan 9211 PP 000~ Film 3821~1A0001
Group ! 161/120/The vault
161 06/20/1986 9212 PLot PLan 9212 PP 000~ Film 3821M1AO001
~ Group Z 161/120/The vault
161 06/2~1986 9Z~ Plot Plan 9Z~ PP O00& Film 3821HlAO001
Group ! 161/120/The Vault
RROESTY..,RR061 City of Teemcuts Page 17
12/15/1993 Destruction States Ltsttng 16:15:68
Rat. FiLe Reference # Storage fiedie
Doc. Item ~
Ref. Date Ref. Brief Description Type Security CLass Storage Location Location Refere ~
161 06/27/1986 9020 PLot PLan 9020 PP O01X FiLm 3821N1&O001
Group i 161/120/The VauLt
161 0612711986 9105 PLot PLan 9105 PP OQO FiLm 3821N1AOOQ1
Group I 161/120/The VauLt
161 0710111986 9096 PLot PLan 9096 PP 000~ FiLm 3821H1AO001
Group ! 161/120/The VauLt
161 07/01/1986 9233 PLot PLan 9233 PP 000 Fitm 3821M1AQQ01
Group ! 161/1201The VauLt
161 07109/1986 9258 PLot PLan 9258 PP O00~ Fj Lm 3821N1AOOO1
Group I 161/120/The VauLt
161 07/11/1986 9039 PLot PLan 9039 PP 000~ FiLm 3821N1AO001
Group i 161/120/The VauLt
161 07/11/1986 908? PLot PLan 9087 PP O0(X FiLm 3821mA0001
Group ! 161/12Q/The VauLt
161 07/11/1986 911:5 PLot PLan 911:5 PP O00z, FiLm ~821NIAO001
Group I 161/120/The VauLt
161 0712211986 9281 PLot PLan 9281 PP 000~ Fitm 3821H1AO001
Group I 161/120/The VauLt
161 07/2l,/1986 9168 PLot PLan 9168 PP OOQ4 Fi Lm 3821NIA(X)Q1
Group ! 161/120/The VauLt
161 0712~,11986 9178 PLot PLan 9178 PP 000~ FiLm 3821N1AOOO1
Group ! 161/120/The VauLt
161 07/25/1~86 ~N)68 PLot PLan 9068 PP 0004 Fi Lm 3821NIAO001
Group I 161/120/The VauLt
161 0712911986 9278 PLot PLan 9278 PP 0004 Fi Lm :5821N1AO001
Group ! 161/120/The VauLt
161 07/29/1986 928/, PLot PLan 928~ PP 0004 Fitm 3821N1AO001
Group I 161/120/The VauLt
161 0712911986 9285 PLot PLan 9285 PP 0004 Fitm 3821NIAO001
Group I 161/120/The VauLt
161 08/05/1986 7859 PLot PLan 7859 PP 000:5 Fitm ~821N1AO001
Group I 161/120/The VauLt
161 08/08/1986 9060 PLot PLan 9060 PP 000/, FiLm ~821M1AO001
Group ! 1611120/The VauLt
161 08/22/1986 9115 PLot PLan 9115 PP QO0~ FiLm :5821MIAO001
Group I 161/120/The VauLt
IUtDESTY...RR061 City of TtuLa Page 18
12/15/1993 Destruction Status Listing 16:15:~8
D, Qr-- item Rat. FiLe Reference # Storage Hedia
[ Date Ref. Brief Description Type Security CLass Storage Location Location Reference
161 08/22/1986 9156 PLot PLan 9156 PP O00& FiLm :3821N1AO001
Group Z 161/120/The VauLt
161 09/12/1986 9155 PLot PLan 9155 PP OQO~ Film 3821N1AQO01
" Group ! 161/12Q/The Vault
............ ~ .....................................................
161 09/12/1986 9163 PLot PLan 9163 PP OQO~ Film 3821N1AQO01
Group ! 161/120/The Vault
161 09/12/1986 9262 PLot PLan 9242 PP O00& Film 3821N1AQO01
Group ! 161/120/The Vault
161 o9/lz/1986 9263 PLot PLan 9243 PP C)OO& Film 3821M1AQQ01
Group ! 161/120/The vault
161 09/26/1986 9023 PLot PLan 9023 PP QO(X Film 3821NIAOOOl
Group I 161/1ZO/The Vault
161 10/10/1986 9193 PLot PLan 9193 PP OOO& Film 3821N1AOOOl
Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 10/10/1986 919~ PLot PLan 919~ PP QO(~ Film 3821NIAQOQ1
Group I 161/12Q/The Vault
'~ d0/10/1986 9195 PLot PLan 9195 PP 0004 Film 3821NIAO001
Group ! 161/120/The Vault
161 10/10/1986 9287 PLot PLan 9287 PP 0004 Film 3821MIAO001
Group L 161/120/The VauLt
161 10/26/1986 9164 PLot PLan 9164 pP 000~ Film 3821N1AO001
Group I 161/120/The VauLt
161 10/24/1986 9223 PLot PLan 9223 PP 0004 Film 3821N1AO001
Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 11/0~1986 9200 Plot PLan 9200 PP 0004 Film 3821HIAO001
Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 11/0~1986 9231 PLot PLan 9231 PP 0004 Film 38Z1H1AO001
Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 1110711986 9232 PLot PLan 9232 PP 0004 Film 3821H1AQQ01
Group i 161/120/The VauLt
161 11/07/1986 92~4 PLot PLan 92~4 PP 00~ Film :38ZlN1AO001
Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 01/09/1987 9191 PLot PLan 9191 PP 0004 Film 3821H1AO001
/"' Group [ 161/120/The Vault
161 03/20/1987 9246 PLot PLan 9266 PP 000~ Film 3821N1AO001
Group I 16111201The VauLt
RBDESTY...RR061 City of Teascute Page 19
12/15/lfF5 Destruction $tatul Listing 16:15:~8
D~. item Rat. FiLe Reference # Storage fiedie
Ref. Date Ref. Brief Description Type Security CLass Storale Location Location lefere ~
161 ~/02/1987 8851 PLot PLan ~ 00~ Fits )aZlH1AO001
Group i 161/120/The VauLt
161 ~/24/1987 1~0 PLot PL~ ~ 000200011352 FiLm 3821N1AO001
Group i 161/120/The VauLt
161 0~10/1~87 91~8 PLot PL~ 91~8 PP 00~ Fits 3821H1AO001
Group I 161/120/The VauLt
161 0~10/1967 ~ PLot PLan ~06 ~ 000~ FiLm 3821H1AO001
Group ! 161/120/The VauLt
161 0~10/1~87 9207 PLot PLan 9207 PP 000~ FiLm 382.1H1AO001
Group [ 161/120/The huLL
161 11/~/1~67 9213 PLot PLan 9213 ~ 00~ FiLm ~821H1AO001
Group i 161/120/The VauLt
161 06/06/1~88 8~ PLot PLan lt54 PP 00~ Fits 3821N1AO001
Group ] 161/l~/The VauLt
161 ~/~/1~88 8053 PLot PLan ~53 ~ 00~ FiLm ~821N1AO001
Group I 161/120/The VauLt
................................................................. ~
161 0~18/1988 41~7 PLot PLan ~7 PP 0~300011~0 Fits 3821H1AO~1
Group ! 161/120/The VauLt
333 Records Processed
ITEM
16
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
~-'II~ANCE OFFICER
/ CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning '~
January 11, 1994
Pechanga Casino Status Report
Prepared By:
Saied Naaseh, Associate Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
Receive and File
BACKGROUND
The initial Pechanga Task Force held their first meeting on December 15, 1993. At this
meeting the members introduced themselves and the purpose of the Task Force was
discussed (refer to Attachment No. I for the meeting agenda and all other information that
was distributed to the members). Furthermore, the environmental review process and
environmental impacts of the project were discussed as well as the applicability and collection
of sales tax. The next meeting of the Task Force will be on January 26, 1993 with the time
and.place to be announced at a later date.
The purpose of the Task Force is to bring together all the parties involved and ensure
identification and mitigation of all the environmental impacts.
The Task Force discussed the differences between Environmental Assessments (EA) and
Environmental Impact Statements (EIS). Essentially, if all significant impacts on the quality
of the human environment of the project are not or cannot be mitigated, an EIS will be
required. The determination of significance of an impact and whether this impact has been
fully mitigated is ultimately the responsibility of the National Indian Gaming Commission (refer
to Attachment No. 2 for more information regarding the National Indian Gaming Commission's
National Environmental Policy Act Procedures).
The environmental consultant for the project described fourteen (14) categories of impacts
that will be discussed in the EA. The Task Force added three (3) new impacts to the list;
these are: Social and Economic Impacts, Impacts on Police and Fire Services and Impacts on
Property Values. Additionally, Wildlife Corridor Impacts and Channel Stability Impacts were
added to the Biological Resources and Hydrology sections, respectively.
The Task Force had some questions regarding the applicability of sales tax to this project.
According to the City Attorney, all businesses owned by the Reservation and operated on the
Reservation land are exempt from sales tax. Gambling activities are not subject to sales tax.
Further research is being done by the City Attorney on the applicability of sales tax if other
non-Indian partners, such as Grand Casinos, are involved in this project.
R:\S~STAFFRlq'~ECHANOA.CC2 115194 tjs 1
FISCAL IMPACT
None
Attachments:
1. Pechanga Task Force Meeting No. 1 Agenda - Page 3
2. National Indian Gaming Commission o National Environmental Policy Act Procedures -
Page 4
R:\S\STAlqqtIq~PI~,ANOA.~"'2 1/3~4 tjs Z)
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
PECHANGA TASK FORCE MEETING NO. I AGENDA
R:~S\STAFI;RIrI'~[aI~"HA~OA.CC'2 I/3/94
,-- PECHANGA TASK FORCE
MEETING 1
AGENDA
12/15/93
I. INTRODUCTIONS
II. PURPOSE OF TASK FORCE
III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
IV. REVIEW OF ACTIVITIES TO DATE
V. PERMIT AND ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROCESS
A. DEFINITIONS
B. SCOPE OF ISSUES
C. TIMING
VI. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS/RECOMMENDATIONS
VII. NEXT MEETING DATE
VIII. ADJOURNMENT
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
Ae
Terminology
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Environmental Assessment CEA)
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
Record of Decision
Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI)
Lead Agency/Cooperating Agency
B. Federal Agency Guidelines
Comparison of EA and EIS
2.
3.
4.
5.
EA as initial analyses
Formal public scoping - EIS/EA
Formal public review prior to draft decision - EIS/EA
NEPA/CEQA emphasis on public involvement
Scope and depth of analyses
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
Ae
Terminology/Parallels with NEPA
2.
3.
4.
5.
Initial Study (IS)/compare with EA
Environmental Impact Report (EIR)/eompare with EIS/EA
Findings of Fact/Record of Decision
Negative Declaration (ND)/compare with FONSI
Lead Agency, Responsible Agency
B. CEQA guidelines and agency guidelines
DEFINITIONS
Environmental Assessment (EA). Systematic multi-disciplinary and comprehensive technical
study idea~tifying and focusing on potential environmental impacts. EA is prepared when
potential environmental impacts are considered resolvable.
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). Expanded comprehensive technical studies
summarized in a structured format for easy public understanding. EIS is prepared when
scope of project is regional or of national scope, and clearly creates adverse impacts to
the environment (i.e., regional land fill, reservoirs, and interstate/freeways).
Environmental Impact Report (EIR). Comprehensive environmental document required under
CEQA often used with both EAs and EISs.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROCESS ----
SCOPE OF ISSUES TO BE REVIEWED
1. LAND USE
2. TRAFFIC CIRCULATION
3. WATER AVAIl,ABILITY
4. SEWAGE TREATMENT
5. AIR QUALITY
6. NOISE
7. VISUAL AESTHETICS
8. CULTURAL RESOURCES
9. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
10.' DARK SKrF, S/LIGHTING
11. HYDROLOGY
12. WATER QUALITY
13. GEOLOGY/SOILS
14. PUBLIC SAFETY
Columnists ,
D.C. games and Trump cards
By Dick Pewell
"Chief Among Issue" columnist
The man next to me nudged
gently and asked, "Have you seen
Donald Trump yet? They say he's
in the room." I looked about but did
fludying my notes.
Suddenly strobes flashed and
cameras clicked. Trump had
arrived. He moved about my corner
of the room, giving the reporters
and camera crew plenty of opportu-
not see him. The Congressional nity for photographs and video tape.
hearing room was small, but packed . He smiled and greeted three people
to the gills with television crews, in front of me by name and nodded
photographers, and other news
media people, besides those of us
who would soon be testifying.
Nervously, I focused my
attention again on my outline of
remarks that I would soon present to
the congressional subcommittee. I
had been over my notes a thousand
times before, but somehow this
setting was unique, different than
had expected, filled with nervous
energy and electrici~
A few moments er, an
attractive woman named Ciaudia
Weinstein came over to where l was
sitting and introduced herself. She
was an assistant producer of
Minutes." I had watched her earlier
move easily about the room with an
all-knowing sense of confidence, as
if she knew who everybody in the
room was and what they were
thinking about.
Skillfully, she asked several
questions that immediately put me
at ease. She smiled and said, 'I think
it would be better if I called you
later. Could you give me your
phone number. I don't want to
interrupt your preparation for the
subconunittee." I gave her my
number and gratefully went back to
an acknowledgement to me as well.
Then promptly at 9:30 a.m. the
hearings began.
Why was this hearing important
and what was going on? Well,
Confress wanted farst hand infor-
mation on how Indian casinos arc
dealing with crime, especially
organized crime. Is organized crime
a threat and how are casinos and
law enforcement dealing with the
problem? Will there be problems
with the mob in the future? Con-
gress wanted to know if new laws
should be c~cated or changes made
in existing laws.
Are these questions important to
Minnesotsus? You bet they are.
Minnesota has fortunately been
relatively free of organized crime as
we think of it out East. We are free
fri~in crime families telling our
businesses with whom they will do
business and where they will buy
their supplies. And that's the way
we want to keep it. People like
Trump would like to see Indian
casino gambling halted, thus
ensuring profits for New Jersey or
Las Vegas, but are having a hard
time finding facts that indicate
organized crime is in~ltrating
Indian casinos. The FBI's Jim
Moody, a section chief of the
Organized Crime and Drug Divi-
sion, testified that there were no
current cases of mob involvement
with Indian casinos, nor did he have
knowledge that casinos were being
infiltrated. Other federal officials
gave clean bffis of health as well to
the Indian organizations.
Congress was not tackling the
relative merits of casino gambling
or the ethics of gambling itseft. It
simply wanted a clear, unbiased and
balanced view of what was actually
taking place in Indian casinos
today. I am glad Congress has these
concerns and is looking after those
of us who host gaming.
It was also nice to testify
without being on the hot spot with
either the city or the reservation.
Never did anyone try to tell me
what to say or how to say it. I
simply told the Subcommittee what
I saw as a police official with the
saeond largest Indian ~aming casino
in the world in my jurisdiction. The
city paid my wage for the day of
testimony and the Mdewakanton
covered my travel and lodging
expenses. I am grateful to both for
the opportunity and the education I
received from this venture. It was
simply another positive step in
building relationships and trust
between two entities that must work
together to achieve a secure future
for their children.
Dick Powell is chief of the Prior
Lake Police Department.
Ups and Downs
Newspaper staff members 6nd ruders ace welcome to submit item for this column. Staff writers' initials will
be used instead offnil name to avoid unnecessary cepetition. The full name ofnon-staff wrtters will be used. Each
item should be 100 words or less, and the writer must include his or her name. addcess and phone number.
Congratulatory or thank-yon notes of public interest will be accepted. Not all Items will be run.
*Thumbs up to the Alpha Women's Center for offering frec pregnancy tests and helping women with any needs
they might have during crisis pregnancies. -- Margacet Koch
*Thumbs down to the woman who decided to pick deeoratlve weeds along County Road 21 while parking her car
in the fight driving lane of the busy roadway recently. That kind of casual attitude is bad enough under normal traffic
eonditious, but with detoured traffw on County Road 21 increasing the volume of cars these days, it was downright
danszerou.~. --
From a Police Chief's Perspective
by Dick lowell
Editor's Note: The following anicle by Prior Lake Police Chief Dick Powell has been submitted
to Casino Magazine for publication. It offers a positive perspective of communit3' cooperation and
interaction.
Seventeen years ago, things were much
different than they are today in the Mdewakanton
Sioux Community in Prior Lake, Minnesota.
Economic development was limited to the few
people involved in the recycling of copper
telephone wire. The insulation was simply burned
f~om the wire and the copper collected. Later,
a business evolved under the direction of the late
Norman Crooks. Crooks disposed of diseased
elm wood principally delivered from the greater
Minneapolis-St. Paul metropolitan area. This
business was lucrative, but soon yielded to
inexpensive cigarettes and bingo. The Sioux
Community came of age and casino gambling
followed.
Throughout this evolution, life was not easy
for me as the Police Chief of prior Lake and the
Sioux Community. Tw~ political factions within
the Sioux Community were often at odds. Bitter
feelings and sometimes violence surfaced at tribal
meetings. I walked a tightrope between the two
factions and tried not to be viewed as a proponent
of either group. I would love to take credit for
solving the community's problems, but the
answer came from within. Tribal voting was done
temporarily by mail instead of at the community
center. Some important meetings were held away
from Indian country to ease stress and most
importantly, a tribal court was established to solve
community problems.
Much of the credit must go to people like
Henry Buffalo and other tribal court members.
Police now were able to do police work for the
community, and the community was managing
its own civil affairs. A milestone had been
reached. Blockaded roads, one of my worst
nightmares, ceased to exist. Occupied community
buildings, where one faction tested the strength
of other, disappeared, and the community
continued to develop.
All of this did not happen, however, without
incident. One night about twenty unhappy people
tested the authority of the prevailing faction. The
group chose to occupy a Casino building after
closing hours. The Tribal Chairman requested
that the police remove the trespassers. I tried to
resolve the problem, but it was clear that the
occupiers were going to make a statement. and
they did. Finally, I asked the Chairman to make
citizens' arrests and then, I did my job. Soon,
my policemen ran out of handcuffs, but the
protesters promised to behave as if they were
handcuffed and all went off to jail with dignity.
Today, the protesters still have my respect for their
co-operation. Tribal member and Secretary./
Treasurer Darlene Malta said it best recently.
"We have all grown up a lot;'
Today things are much different. Public Law
280 is generally accepted. The Indian community
probably has fewer problems than the white
cormnunity per capita. Yes, Little Six Casino
calls for police assistance frequently, but that is
to be expected from a business so large and
active. Indian leaders have stepped forward to
support the City of Prior Lake and its police
department. They have demonstrated their
support verbally and financially, dedicating
dollars to "pay their own way" for their newly-
created businesses. An outpouring of money has
also gone to other worthy causes within the
greater community.
As a Police Chief, my agenda now includes
numerous regularly scheduled meetings with
Indian leaders and their business subordinates.
I feel comfortable at tribal meetings where all
factions and leaders participate equally. I can
speak candidly and not fear that I am appearing
to be partial to one side or another.
When I attend other meetings or receive calls
from across the United States about Indian
gambling, I speak proudly about our Minnesota
Indian country and the Shakopee Mdewakanton
Sioux. I tell them about how Little Six employs
more people than any other business in our
county. I also tell them we have only seen the tip
of the iceberg. Watch this economy over the next
ten years. Times are changing in Indian Country
and I am glad to be part of it.
Dick Powell is the Police Chief of Prior Lake. Minnesnu:.
He is a past Board member of the Minnest~ta Otie~ qf Poli~ 'c
Association and has taught for the Minnesota Burcart of
Criminal Apprehension.
6 lapi OaFs
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
NATIONAL INDIAN GAMING COMMISSION
NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT PROCEDURES
R:\S~STAFFR.PT~ECHANOA.CC2 1/3194 tit 4
Pederd Islbler I Vol. SO. No. 67 I Friday, April 9. 1993 I Papmad Rules
Dated: Mssch 30, 1993.
Susan M. Weismms,
Secretary.
IFR Dec. 93-8232 Filed 4-8-03; I:4S
delivered to the Commission between
the hours of 9 e.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, or faxsd to {202) 632-
7066 [not s tnU-free number]. Comments
may be inspected by ths public be(weaa
the hours of 9 tin. and noon sad 2 p.m.
to 5 p.m.. Monday throuSh Fri,hy.
Susan C. arlmta st (202) 632-7003, oxt.
34, er by facsimile st (2o2) 632-7oe~
(not toll-free numbers).
Background
The Indian Gamin8 bsulato~ Act
(ICRA. or the Act)., 25 U.S.C 2701 ot
seq., was signed into isw on October 17,
NATIONAL INDIAN GAllNil
COMMISSIOfi
25 CFR Part 511 .
RIN 3141-AA~6
Procedures
AGENCY: National Indian C, enlnI
Commission.
SUMMARY: The NsUonal Indian Gaming
Commission is reposing this rule for
the purpose of ~scn'bing ths
procedures the Commission proposes to
adopt pursuant to the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1909.
These proposed reZuLstlona anpplement
the regulations promulgated by the
Council on Environmental Quality.
DATES: Comments must be received by
May 10, 1993.
ADDRESSES: Comments my be mailed
to: NEPA Rule Comments, NstJenal
Indian Gaming Commission, suite 250,
1850 M St., NW., Wuhin~ton, DC
20036-5803. Comments rosy be
gamin8 (regulstsd undsr nsgo6atsd
triba]4tats com]~cts}.
The Commissson also published final
rules regarding its review and approval
of tribal gamin ordinances and
resolutions us~;r sections 2710 and
2712 of the Act (58 FR 5502 0anuary 22,
1993]], Privacy Act procedures IS8 FIt
5_8_14 Uanuary 22, 1993]), compliance
~d safercement r__c~c~Hures under
sections 2705 andP;706 of tie Act
FR 5833 Oanuary 22, 1993]), and review
and spprovsl of management contracts
under sections 2711 and 2712 of the
ICRA (58 FR 5818 (Janusry 22, 1993}}.
Section 2711(h) of the IGRA transferred
to the Commission the suthority of the
.with the Commission exsn:ising a
limited rob.
On A 15, 19gi, ths Commission
:~ tequirins clase IT 8maIn8 operations to
-j
compute and pay to tim Com mtqion b supplemant, rathor thn sulmms~, the
annual bss required by section 2717 d CEQ's mS~htions. Tbe proposed
the IGR,~L On April 9. 1992 (57 FR re6ulaUmts lain ths Commis~ion'l
12382), the Commission published a po~ciss m~r~ng the um of
final rule that doffass by statubry environmsatal lrdormatioa in its
terms, notsbly c]srifying the distinctions plsaning and dscision-nmkin8. Tbs
betwan chss II gamin~ (mauhtsd by re~Isfions glee would require ths
tribes sad the Commission] and class m Commission to be responsible for ths
manag~n_ent contracts.
The Commission also published
proposed rules regarding disclosure of
informstion under the Freedom of
Information Act (57 FR 55212
(November 24, 1992]).
The reguletions proposed today
proride slrateSies and procedures the
Commission proposes to sdopt pursusnt
to the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969 (NEPAL 42 U.S.C. 4321 e~
seq. ConFess enacted NEPA to
encourqe a nstionsl policy of
protectj .enhsnctng, and restolinB the
quality ~e human environment. The
Counct| on Envimnmentsl Quality
[CEQ.). established pursuant to NEPA,
promulgated implementing regulations
1988. The ICRA established the - at 40 CI~ puts 1501 through 1508
Natlena! Indian GamIng Commjmjon NEPA and the CE~'s regulations require
{NIC, C, or the Commission]. 'f'no IGRA
every federal a ency to estsblish
classaries pains inlo clau I, clsss IT p urea anTstrsteaies that give
and clsss lIT. TIm tribes hart ~xclusive appropriate consideration to the
Jurisdiction over class I gamin~. Class I1 environmental consequences of federal
gaming is ]
rsau ated by the tribes and the agency actions.
Commission. Class lql ndng is
rggulated by lndivtd~s~et~ribes end Itsare National EnTtronmmnal PUticy Act
under negoUeled tribal-state compacts. Proceduree
preparation of environram,Jag ana]yms
ConcSrnin,a actions of the Commission
that ma have a significant impact on
the qu~'ty of the human anviromnsnL
s y.
Accordin j 518.4 ofths posmd
regulations sets forth the ;i~cies ths
Commission is propoain6 to slept to
ensure compliance with NEPA trsd tbs
Public psrtic[pstion is an
sspect of the NEPA
AccordinSly, SS18.S of the reposed
-sulatiom providesto
ensure such public involvement. Under
that section, the Commission proposes
to give notice to ths public af ths
8vai r of anvironmanLal documents
Secretsry of the Interior undw 25 U.S.C. prepahr~ o.t, ths NEPA process. -This
81 to review and appm management seaion wo~dur~o ube ths
contracts concerning Indian gaming. CommiltjOO to provir~; public notice of
Sections 2710(d)(9] and 2711 of the NEPA-mlstsd hastings and public
IGRA rgquire lribes to submit new meetings concerning proposed federal
managmnent contrscts to the Chairman actions in wtticJa thm Commlvion is
of tIM Commission for his or her review
anyaired. Ths way in which notics will
and approval and provide standards for be provided will be ctslsrm in,d on a
approval. Sad. ion 2712 centsins
case by cam basis dspmndin6 upon the
standsrds and procsturm for tie magnitude and affscts ofa particaxlar
Chairman's review of axisring
NEPA contain rsqui~emants for the
desi~nat~n of lead and coopsra '
agencies for propessd actions ~t~ox~o ving
morn ~ one federal agency. A
detstminstion of agency status as a lead
or conperatin8 areracy is -,~ds using
various factm~ set out in the CEQ's
regulations. A lead sl~ncy has ths
uhimats ass onsibility for the centsat of
an EA or ~. A coo rating agen is
responsible for ths ~elopment 3
informatkm and the preparation of
environmsntal analyses st ths reqtmst of
the lsad sgoncy.
The Commission believes that in any
instances wham it is involved in fits
The purpose of thes0 pro_pog~___ provisions for the Commiuion's role as
regulations is to inform the pubtic of the m lead or coo rating ags in
Commlulo,, proposes to ado t pmuant preparation or environmemal
to NEPA. TM propos~ regu~Uons documents is massa.-7.
preparation of environmental
documents, other federal agencies will
-also be involvsd due to various fadstel
actions, Such fedaral sctions could
include the leading of federal monies to
a tribe for activitiss mhted to tribal
sming, or approving a leess of tribal
f~ds for gamin In such cases, the
Commission wi~! coopareas in the
preparation of environmental
documents. Sodion 518.7 contains
18354 Federal ReSister / Vol. 58. No. 67 / Friday. April O. 1993 / Proposed Rule
Under NEPA, reposed qenc7 agencies may, however, permit a y
actions fit one o~u~ categories. First. other than the agency to pm ~stsj
a proposed action which norms]!y has When an agency allows a th~mp~rty
no significant impact on the quality of pm sn EA the a ncy is required to
Categorical Exclusion. Actions listed as contained in the f.A, and is rssponaib ·
Categorical Exclusions normally do not for the accuracy. scope. and content of
require the preparation of
environmental documents. The
Commission believe that most of its
actions fall into this category, Section
la
518.9 of the pro osed tions.
actions.
The second category corn rises
actions normally requiring ~e
preparation of an Environmental
Assessment (EA). An EA must be
prepared when the environmental
consequences of · particular action ire
unclear end need to be further defined.
Preparation of an EA leads to one of two
results. If the EA reveals that the
prnposed action may have · significant
irapad on the quality of the human
environment, reparation den
Environmen~sFlmpact Statement (EIS)
(discussed below) is required. On the
other hand. if the EA reveals that the
proposed action will have no significant
impact on the quality of the human
environment. a finding of no significant
im d (FONSI) is .required. '
~e Commission believes the
Chairman's authority, under sections
2711 and 2712 of the ICRA, to approve
ma--~agement contracts end
modifications to management contracts
may triter the HEPA process and
require the preparation of an EA when
such contracts contain provisions for
the development and construction of
gaming operations or parts thereof.
Section 518A0 proposes to require the
preparation of an EA in such cases.
Section 518.10 also provide general
procedures for the preparation of all
EAs.
The third category consists of actions
normally requir~n8 the pro ereteen of an
EIS. An EIS is necessm7 w~en a
proposed action may have a significant
impact on the quality of the human
environment. An EIS is a detailed
written statement containing a full
discussion dell significant
environments] impacts of and
alternatives to · proposed action. An
EIS is necessary when, u · result of an
EA. there is I finding that a proposed
action will have a signf~cant impact on
the quality of the human environment.
rounder NEPA and the CE~'s
regulations, federal qenciea ere
required to take full re sibllity fur
the occuracT, scope, an~tant of
environmental documents. Federal
the document. Federal agencies may
also hire third party contractore to
disclosure statement denying any
financis] or other interest, in the
outcome of the pro osed federal action.
Section 518,12 im;~;menta these
provisions,
Rquistory Mattera
Executive Order 12292 and the
Regulatoz7 FJexibfiity Act
The Commission has determined that
this document is not s major rule under
Executive Order 12291. The proposed
rare will not have any significant effects
on the economy or result in major
increases in costs or prim for
consumers, individual industries,
federal, state, or local governments,
agencies or eographical regions. The
proposed ~a~e will not hays any edvere
effects on competition. employment.
investment, productivity, innovation, or
the export/import market.
Pursuant to the l~eguletory Flexibility
Act, 5 U.S.C. 601 et esq., the
Commission has determined that this
proposed rule 'will not have a significant
economic impact on s substantial
number of small entities. Because this
pro osed rule is procedural in nature. it
wilfn°ot impose substantive
requirements that could be deemed
impacts within the scope of the IGRA.
Paperwork Reduction Act
The information collection
uirementa contained in this pro osecl
~r~; have been submitted to the O~ca
of Mana eraeat and Budget (ely!B] for
approv~as required by 44 U.S.C. 3501
et sag. The collection of this information
will not be required until it has been
approved by OMB.
National Environmental Policy Act
The Commission has determined that
this proposed rulerookie does not
constitute e major fsde~a~action
significantly affecting the quality of the
human environment and that no
detailed statement is required pursuant
to the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969.
Executive Order I2778
The Chairman of the NICC hu
Order 12778, "Civil Justice Reform." 56
FR 55195. October 25. 1991.
Dttsd: ~ 23, 1993.
Chairman, National Indian Gaming
Ganunission.*
List of Subjects in Z5 CFR Part
requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the
c~odrumble. chapter m of title 25 of the
· of Federal Regulations is proposed
to be eraended by adding part 518 to
subchapter A.
PART 51 e-NATiONAL
ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT
PROCEDURE2
518.1 Ptupose and scol~ *
518.2 Definitions under this pro't..
51a.3 Ensponsibllites.
518.4 Policy,
518.5 Public involvement.
518.6 Adoption of mviously drafted
other Federal qencks.
518.7 lead and cooperating agencies.
518.8 Types of sctions.
518,9 Cstegorical exclusioDs,
518.10 Environmental assessments.
518.11 Environmental impact statements.
~18.1Z Propmotion of environmental
usessments and environmental impact
statements.
Authority: 25 U.S.C. 2701 et seq.; 42 U.S.C
4321 et
ISt&l
This part contains the regulations of .
the National Indian Gaming
Commission (NIGC, or the Commission)
implementin8 the Nations]
Environmental Po~cy Act of 1969
[NEPA] [42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.). NEPA
established a national policy for the
protection, enhancement. end
restoration of the buman environment.
The Council on Environments] Quality
(CEQ}, established pursuant to NEPA,
promulgated implementing regulations
at 40 CFR parts 1501 through 1508.
NEPA and the CEQ's letone require
all Federal a enciea tor~eJelop
procedures ~at give appropriate
consideration to the environments]
consequences of proposed federal
agency actions that will affect the
quality of the human environment. This
pefi su piemanes the NEPA regulations
promu~ated by the CEQ.
IS1&2 Dsfiwdtkwmuadert~kpert
As used in this pert~ the following
terms have the fled meaninge:
in sealions 2r;] end 2Co]{2] of Exocutivo signtficsmt effect on the human a
Federal legbeer I YoL g, No. S? ! Pridsy, April 9, 1993 I h,,Fofed Rules
18355
environment and_ which have
~- found to have no such ok and
which haltiNt ms anvilfret-_ ' I
usesnet nor ml environmetal
impact stststnent is ~
(b) CoopeatEn/ mesa any
Federal aSmc~ o~h~e~e~ · ked agec
which has J~'bdJct~oo, by law or spsdsl
expertise, with respect to any
environmental impact involved in a '
proposal (of a reasonable alternative) for
legislation or other major Federal action
significantly affecting the quality of the
human environment, A State or local
agency of stmfiar quslificsUons or,
when the effects ate on a rasewstien, en
Indian tribe, may by agreement with the
lead agency become s coopeaeng
agency.
(c) Cumulotive jml~ct is the impact
on the environment which results from
the incremental impact of an action ·
when added to oths past, present, end
reasonably foreseeable future actions
regardless or what agency (Feelers] or
non-Federal) or person underttkss such
other actions. Cumulative impacts can
result from individually minor but
col]ectively significant actions taking
place over s period of Ume,
(d) Effects include:
(1) Direct effects, which are caused by
the action and occur at the same time
/"' and p]ace,
(z) IncLirect effects, which &re caused
by the action end am hter inC'.me or
fsfiher removed in distance, but era still
re&sonaMy foreseeable, Indizect effects
ms include Fowth indudng efface
~m~other effects related to induced
chen es in the pattern of land use,
po;~ation density or growth rate, and
related effects on air and water end
other natural systems, including
ecosystems,
(3) "Effects" and "impacts' as used in.
this part are synon ous, Effucts
includes ecologica~;(su°ch as the effects
one is necessary.
(2) An suvironmentsl assessant
shall include brief discussions of the
need for the proposal, of alternatives as
required by secUon 102(2)(E) of NEPA,
of the environmental impure of the
reposed action and alternativns, and a
Esttn8 of agencies and penone
consultad.
(i) Environmentel document includes
the documents contained in pungraphs
(e_L~8_), (h), sad (m) of this section.
(g) Environmantel im!~ct stolemeat
means a detailed written statement as
re uired b~ section 102(2)(C) of NEPA.
~) Finding o/no =igni~cant impact
means · document prepared by the
Commission. when the Commission is
acting es e !sed agency. briefly
presenting the reasons why en action.
other than · categorica) exclusion. will
not have a dgnlficant effect on the
human envbonment end for which an
environmetal im act statement
therefore wfii not ~ prepared. It shall
include en environmental euessment or
e summary of en environmental
assessment and shall note en other
environmental documents related to it.
If the assessment is included. the
finding need not repeat any of the
.discussion in the assessment but may
interpreted comprehensi~ely to include
the natural and physical environment
end the relationship of people with thet
environment, This meens that economic
or social effe~s are not intended by
themselves to requLre preparation of an
environmental impact statement. When
an anvironmsntal impact statement is
prepared and economic, social, natural,
or physical environmental effects are
(U) Aid in compliance with NEPA maintenance oparsttons during the lib
wlsan n~ mvbtmmental Impact of the action.
statement is nscaassry. (S) Cornpan for an impact by
(ill) Fscfiitate prspsralion of-,, replacing or p~ss~i'~f°: sukstituta
snvtronmsntaltmp~et statement wisa resource ot snvirortmsnit
(]) NEPA process means all me&sums
necessaxy for compliance with the
that an environmental impact statement
will is sd and considered. The
[1) Descriis the proposed action
possible alternatives,
(2) Describe the proposed aceping
process including whether, when, and
where any acepin8 meetin will be held.
(3) State the name sad aScLress of the
NEP^ Officer.
(n) Scope consists of the range of
actions, alternatives, and impacts to be
considered in an envLronmental impact
ststernent. 'l'ae scope of an individual
statement may depend o~ its
relationships to other statements. To
determine the scope of environmental
impact statements, sgendes shad
consider 3 types of actions, 3 types of
alternatives, and 3 types of impacts.
The include:
(1~ Act/on. (i) Connected actions,
which means that they are closely
related and therefore should be
discussed in the same im act statement.
Actions are connected if ~ey:,
(A) Automatically trigger other
actions which may rer[uire
environmental imp, act statements.
(B) C.,snnot or will not proceed tmJess
other actions sre taken previously or
simultsnetmsly,
( ) Are interdependent parts ors
lsr~ scUon and depend on the larger
action for their Justification.
(ij) Cumulative actions, which when
viewed with other proposed actions
hsvs c~Lmulativsl significant impacts
and should there~, be discussed in
have ~th ~s~ ~d ds~ p ~ ~ bility for pining an ~ml~ or phy. An ~ may
e~ ,van if ~ ~ ~ environS! lmps~ ~slem~ wi~ to ~~ ~s ~ ~
· ; sH~ will {1} Arming ~ lmpa~ slt~ by ~m ~s ~ way Io s ~taly
not ~i~ a ~ln ~ion ~ ~s of ~ ~s ~mbi~ imps of si~ aaions
(e) Environmental ass6sment resins:
{1) A concise public document f~
which the Commission is responsibla
that serves to:
(i) Briefly provide sufficient avidsea
(2) Minlmizin8 impscts by limitin8
the deStee or magnitude of sn action
and Its im Immmtalion.
rahabilitsting. or nstoria8 the ~
onvizonment.
(4] Reducing or eliminating an Impsct
over tires by preservstioe sssl
or reasonable alternatives to such
actions is I0 t~sst them in a single
alternative.
(ii) Other ruesenable counes d
actions.
(iii) MittGallon measures (not in the
proposscl action).
18358
Federal itagimr I Vol. Sa, No. 67 I Friday. April 0, 1993 I F, olx21s~ Rubis
(3} Impacts. (i) Direct impacts.
(iS) Indirect impacts.
(iii} Cumulative impacts.
(o) Signipcanfly, u umd in NEPA and
tl~is part, requires consideration of both
context and Intensity:
(1) ContexL l~is means that the
si~ni~canca of An action must be
eralyzecl in several contexts such u
society as a whole, the affected region,
the affected inteFests, end the !oc~ty.
Sj|~ni~cafice varies with the letting of
the proposed oction. For instance, in the
use of e site-specific action,
significance would usually depend
upon the effects in the locale rather than
in the world u a whole. Both short end
long term effects ere relevant.
(2) Intensity. This refers to the
severity or impact. Responsible of~ctals
must be&r in mind that more than one
egen may make decisions about
pertiac~aspects ors major action. The
following should be considered in
evaluating intensity:
(i) Impacts that may be both beneficial
end adverse. A significant effect may
exist even if the Commission believes
that on balance the effect will be
beneficial.
(iS) The degrae to which the proposed
action effects public health or safety.
(iii) Unique characteristics of the
geographic sea such u proximity to
historic or cultu:al tesoui~el, perk
lands, prime farmlands, weftands, wild
end scenic rivers, or acelogically critical
8.ross.
(iv) The degree to which the effects on
the quality of the human environment
are likely to be highly cont:overeilL
(v) The deSrue to which the possible
effects on the human environment ere
highly uricart&in or involve unique or
unknown risks.
(v0 The deSFee to which the action
may establish a precedent for furtAre
actions with significant effects or
re resents a decision in principle about
a ~tura consideration.
(vii) Whether the action is related to
other actions with individually
insignificant but cumu]etively
significant im s. Significance exam
if it is reason;l~e~o anticipate a
cumulatively signii"icant impact on the
environment. Significance cannot be
avoided by terming an action temporary
or by breaking it down into small
component pertL
(viii) The degree to which the action
may salverely effect direracts, sites,
highways, structures, or objects listed in
or eligible for listin8 in the National
Register of H~storic Places or my caum
loss of destruction of significant
scientific, cu]tursl, or hisloricel
(ix) The degree to which the action available reports to reduce duplication
may adversely affect an endangered or and ark;
threatened species or its habitat that !ass (2~amUP~ar~fio~n$, defined under the
been determined to be critical under the
CEQ's insulations as the coverage of
Endangered Spades Act of 1973 {18 pnerel matters in environmental
documents with nattower sta{ements or
U.S.C. 1531-1544).
(x) Whether the action threatens a
violation of Federal. Sate. or local law
or requirements imposed for the
protsction of the environment.
(p) Tiering rel~era to the coverage of
general matters in brooder
environmental impact statements with
subsequent nortower statements or
environmental analyses referencing the
general discussions and concentrating
solely on the issues specific to the
statement subsequently reparod.
Tierin8 is s propriete Yw~en the
sequence orltstements or analyses is:
[1) From s program, plan, or policy
environmental impact statement to ·
p m, plan, or policy statement or
specific statement or analysis.
(2) From an environmental impact
statement on a specific actiQn st an early
stage to a supplement or a subsequent
statement or analysis st a later stage.
Tierin8 in such cases is appropriate
when it helps the lead agency to focus
on the issues which are ripe for decision
end exclude from consideration issues
already decided or not yet ripe.
JSlaJ Reepontildll6et
The Chairman shall desionste an
employee of the Commission to serve
the NEPA Officer. Such person shah
ensure compliance with NEPA and
related laws. regulations. policies, and
programs.
J518.4 PoJ~y.
(a] It is the policy of the Commission
to comply with all provisions of NEPA
end related laws end regulations.
(b) To the fulleat extent possible.
Commission shell utilize a systematic.
interdisci linary approach to insure the
integrato~Pt~ of the natural and social
sciences end the environmental design
eras in planning and decision-rookieS--
that may have an impact on the human
environment.
(c) The Commission shall prepare
environmental documents in a clear and
concise manner. addressing
pertinent environmental issues. If
environmental documents are pro ersd
by soreanne other than the ComeTsalon.
the Commission shall take
res oneability for the scope and contents
afro documents pursuant to § 518.12.
{1) Substitute or combine
environmental documents with other
analyses, inca rating the general
discussions ~ffo~:~sin8 on the issues
at hand (40 CFR 1508.28); and
(3) incorporate other environmental
documents to reduce the bulk of
environmental effects and values in
ad uste detail so the can be compared
to oe or economic an Yt ical
analysea. Environmental documents end
appropriate analyses shah be circulated
and reviewed st the same time as other
planhie8 documents related to an
develop, and describe appro riate
alternatives to recommendedcourses of
action in any proposal which involves
unresolved conflicts concerning
alternative uses of available resources.
(f] The Commission shall provide for
cases where actions are planned b
private applicants or other non-federal
entities before Federal involvement so
that:
(1] Policies or designated staff are
available to advise potential applicants
of studies or other information
foraseeabl required for later federal
{2) Appropriate State and local
sSenciea, and Indian tribes, are involved
early in the process whoa their
involvement is reasonably foreseeable.
(S~ The Commission shah plan for the
cost of analyses and preparation of
environmental documents during the
budSetary process ralating to the
p_mFem or project.
rn) sr prior consultation with ths
Commi-.,o. may dovi.t.
its normal NEPA procadums in
emerSoncy situations. Such
uranSemants shell be limitsd ~o actions
necessary to control the immediate
impacts of an emergency situation.
JSlU J~ k,~mP,. .... sa~.
(el Genera/iy. The Commission shall
make diligent efforts to involve the
public in pro ariq NEPA documents by
rovidin8 p;~lic notice of NEPA-re]ated
~eertnas. public meetings, end the
availability of environmental
documents.
{b) Env/ronmenfn/dec,meats.
Environmental documents and other
documents related to the NEPA process
shall be sveihble to the public for
review at the NIGC. 1850 M Street, NW.,
suite 250. Washington. DC 20036. or
upon request. Documents shall be made
Federal bibtar /
svsiishle to the public without charge,
except that for voluminous documents,
the Commission may chsrp the
ulster for the cost of duplication.
re?c~] Heorin~s and public meetings. The
Commission shall hold or sponsor
public hearings or meetings in
accordance with NEPA and the CEQ's
regulations when them is substantial
environmental controversy conc®rning a
reposed action. substantial interast in
~olding · hearing. or when another
agency with jurimdiction over the
proposed action requests a hearing or
public meeting. Requests by another
agency must include a statement of
reasons wha hearing on a proposed
action will ~ helpful. Ira draft EIS will
be considered at a hearing or public
meeting, the drafi lag shall be made
available to the public at least 15 days
in advance of the hearing. If the purpose
of the hearing or public meeting is to
develop information for a draft lag. no
such document need bs made available.
{d} Notice. Notice of public 'hearings
or meetings shall be provided accenting
to the following .requirements:
{1} Tbo Commission shall mail notice
of hearings and public meetings to those
who have requested it regarding a
particular proposed action;
{2} In the ces~ of an action with effects
of national concern. the Commission
shall publish notice of hearings and
public meetings in the Federal Register
and shall mail notice to all national
organizations expected to be interested
in the matter; and
{3} tn the case of an action of locel
concern. the Commission shall provide
notice individually to those patens or
entities expected to be internted. or by
publication in local newspapers or
newsletters that may be expected to
media. or posting of notice on and off
the ·its in the area whore the action is
to occur.
o~oe rodMsJ s90n~m.
When the Commission determines ,
that preparation of environmental
documents is necessary, the
Commission may adopt previously
drafted EAs or ]aSs, or portions thereof.
prep·red by another Federal agency for
use in a currant EA or lag. provided that
the original document resets the
standards for an adequate EA or EIS
under the r~gulations. If the actions
covered in the original document and
the proposed action are substantially the
same, the Commission need not -
redrculate the adopted Federal
document, except as a final EA or lag
Vol. 58, No. 67 I Friday, AprU O, 1903 / Proposed Rule
18357
If the Commiasi6n acts as a cooperating
agency pursuant to § 518.7. it may
adopt. without rocirculating. the EA or
EIS ore lead al~ency if, after an
independent review of the document,
the Commission concludes that its
comaants and suggestions have been
satisfied. When the Commission ado ts
an EA or EIS which is not final, or wCen
the pro action being assessed is
rafsPrr~tK to~to the CEQ bocausa of
interagency disagreement, or the
ststement's adequacy is the subject of s
judicial action which is not final, the
Commission shall specify this
information in the current EA or ]aS,
[~'&?
The Commission shall cooperate with
other Federal and state agencies, Indian
tribes, individuals, or entities to ensure
that NEPA considerations are addressed
early in the plannin process. When a
proposed action of ~e Commission
trillere the NEPA process, the
Commission shall consult with other
agencies to determine the extent of
Federal involvement in various aspects
of the proposed action. If several
agencies will be involved due to various
Federal actions, the Commission shall
comply with the requirements in the
CF_~'s regulations (40 CFR 1501.5 end
1501.6] for determining the scope of its
involvement either as a lead or
cooperating agency.
iSleS Types~sct~M.
The following are the cetagories of
proposed actions associated with the
Commission's programs and activities:
(a) CoteaorjcQ] exclusions. Actions
which normally do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the quality of the human environment
and which therefore do not mquira the
preparation of an Environmental
assessment (EA) or an Environmental
impact statement []aS].
{b) Actions normoily requirjn
preporation of on EA. Actions let do
not meat the criteria under paragraph (a]
df this section, end whose effects are not
defined well enough to permit an early
determination that an los is required.
The purpose of an EA is to allow the
Commission to determine whether a
proposed action will bsve a significant
effect on the environment, rasulting in
the need for preparation of either a
finding of no significant impact [FONSI]
or an loS.
(c] Ac~on· requir~n~ t~e pr~ ration
o/on EIS. Actions that normal' y~n~vo a
significant effect on the quality of the
human environment and that normally
require the preparation of an
JS1tl CABark-' esdMelofi~
{a) Categorical exclusions. The
followin8 are actions of the Commissioc
that meet the criteria for categorical
exclusions and normally do not ruquire
the reparation of an EA or an
(1~ Routine administrutive activities
such as personnel activities, internal
organizational chan~.ss. budget matters.
inventories, collection of data and
information nocasssx7 to can7 out the
Commission's duties, educational end
informational programs and activities,
establishing a schedule of fees. and
collecting such f~ms from the operators
of each class H gaming atlivity regulated
by the Commission. pursuant to 25
U.S.C 2717;
(2] Monitoring class il gaming
conducted on Indian lands, including
the inspectkm of books, records. and the
promesas where class II gaming is
conducted as provided under 25 U.S.C.
2706C0);
(3} Conducting or causing to be
conducted beckyround investigations oir
persons or entities with · financial
interest in, or having management
responsibility for, msnagemeat
contracts for class II gsming operations
under 25 U.S.C. 2706Co)(3);
(4] Issuing certificates of self-
regulation to Indian tribes pursuant to
25 U.S.C. 2710(c);
(5) The CheLrnmn's approval of class
II end class [] tribal gaming ordinances.
resolutions, and of modifications to
such ordinances and resolutions under
25 U.S.C. 2710Co), 2710(d], and 2712[b};
{6} The Ch~irman's approval of
management contracts and of
modifications to management contracts
under 25 U.S.C.. 2711[b] and 2712(c],
except that when the manoRsmear
contract or modification provides for the
development or construction of a
{b) Exceptions to cotqoricl
exclusions. If them are extraordinary
circ~mstences which require the
Commission to conduct appropriate
studies to determine If the categorical
exclusion classification is proper for a
particular action. the Commission shall
conduct or cause to be conducted such
studies. including. if necessary, the
preparation of an EA concerning the
action. Such extraordinary
circumstanc-os includo:
[1) Actions that may have si ificant
adverse effects on public heal~a~r
safety;
{2} Actions that may hav~ highly
controversial env&onmental affects;
|3} Actions that may hays highly
uncertain environmental affects or
involve unique or unknown
environmental risks;
38358 Federal Rqbter I Vol, 58, No, 67 I Friday, April 9, 1993 ! Proposed Rule
(4} Actions, re|ee~d to othar actions,
that individually he, insi ficant
environmental effects but ~
{5) Actions that may establish a
precedent for future actions or thee
re resent a decision in principle about
a TJture consideration with significant
environmental effects.
Jsl&lO EMommmesssf,.s.M&
{a) Ad/ons rmyu/r/ng ~he preparelion
o/on E4. If the prepared action is not
c, utegoricelly excluded and prepration
of an EA will mist in determining
environmental impacts of s propooed
action, the Commission shall be
responsible for the preparation of an EA
in accordance with § 158.12. The
Chairman*s approval or modification of
management canines that provide for.
the development and construction of
gamins facilities, or parts thereof,
normally will require the preparation of
~o) Form end con2nf. An EA may be
prepared in any format, provided that it
is prepared in · clear and concise
manner and contains all of the
information necessary to determine
whether a proposed m~tion may have a
significant impact on the human
environment. The Commission shall
involve environmental agencies,
applicants, and the public to the extent
practicable in preparing EAs in
accordance with § 518.5. An EA shall
include:
(1} A brief discussion of the need for
th?z~]~t;rs~dee~vc~°:ij the proposed
action:
(3) ^dveru and beneficial
environmental impacts of the proposed
action; end
[4) ^ list of agencies and parsons
consulted in the preparation of the EA.
(c) Wr/ffen dc~sions. Based on the
information contained in on EA,
Commission shall determine whether to
prepare a FONSI or, whether there is
need for the preparation of an EIS. If the
Commission determines that
preparation of s FeNSt is appropriate,
the Commission shall prepare a written
decision in combination with the EA,
(d) Time tim~tL If, based on the
information contained in an EA, the
Commission determines that s proposed
action will have no significant impact
on the quality of the human
environment, it shall repare s FeNSt.
The Commission shal~mako the FONSI
available to the ainfac~ed public in
accordance with § 518.5, Under certain
circumstances, the Commission shell
make a FeNSt available for public
review for 30 days before
Commission makes a final
determination and before any action
may 'n. A FONSI shall be marie
availab~ for public reviww prior to a
final deearrninaUon when:
{1) The proposed action is closely
similar to one which normally requires
the pre sation of an !~S; or
(2) ~'~: nature of the proposed action
is one without precedent.
9518.11 Envkeamentel
statementre,
{a) Adions requiting the preparation
o/on EIS. The Commission shall be
responsible for the preparation of an EIS
in accordanc~ with § 518.12{c), when
is determined that the approval or
modification of a management contract
containing provisions for development
and conatruction of gaming facilities
will hera a significant impact on the
quality of the human environment. In
preparing an EIS, the Commission shall
cam ly with all provisions of the CE~'s
regu~;tions as set forth in 40 CFR parts
~502 through
{b] Implementing the EIS. The
d~cision concerning a proposed action
for which an EIS has been prepared
shall be documented in a R~c, ord of
!~cision {ROD). The Commiuion, when
acting as lead agency or in cool~kration
with other agencies, shall monitor
activities subt~luant to the issuance of
an ROD to ensure that its provisions are
carried out. The Commission shall also
implement any mitigation activities
identified in the ROD. When acting as
· e lead agency in an action, the
Commission shall:
{1} Include appropriate mitigation
requirements in the ROD;
~2} Upon r~lu~t, inform other
agencies involved in the N~PA proc.~s
oftha progress of mitigation allarts; and
{.q} Upon request, make available to
the public the results of relevant
monitoring.
~5~.~ ~oparedan o~ ~vltonmomst
aoo~um~nto and mvh, onmorw~ Impa~t
{a} Information. The Commiui~n may
require the applicant{s} seeking
approval of a management contract or
modification to submit environmental
information for use in the preparation of
environmental documents. The
Commission shall evaluate th~
information submitted and shah take
res onsibility for its accuracy.
~] Environmental assessmenb. If the
Commission, actin8 as a lead or
cooparati n8 agency, permits another
party, such as the applicant(s) of a
management contract or · third l~rty
evalasso the tn~mafion submitted and
shah varify and be mmponsibie for the
accuracy, mo0pm, and content of the E ~
(c) kw/tonmenfa/ira/Me ~atemen,
The Conunjuion, whdm acting as a lad
or cooperating agmacy, shah prmlMre or
aid in the prelmreeion of an EIS. When
actin as a lead qmacy, the CommiMion
may ~ire a third party, selected by the
Commission. to prwpam an EIS. When
the Coffunission clam to hire s third
party contractor, the Commission shall
prepare a disclosure statement to he
executed by the contractor specifying
that the contractor ha no financial or
other intersst in the outcome of the
action. Also. when b Commission
hires a third party contractor. the
Commission shall furnish guidance on
the proposed sctioa and shall
,lp, narttcipate in the pre arealan of the EIS.
· Conam salon sh:~l also i
independently ~vsluate the information
submitted and shall verify and be
responsible for the accuracy, scope, and
content of the EIS.
[FR Dec. 03--70(t4 Fikd 4-=8-~3; 8:45 aml
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Coaet Guard
33 CFR Pert 117
[CGD13-e3-4~
Drawbridge OlmraUoa FleguisUona;
Youage 9my and Low~ and Clark
Rivet, OR
ACTION: Notice or proposed
SUUMARY: At the request of the Oregon
Departmeat ot Treasportation. the Coast
Guord proposes a cban to the
regulations gaveruing ~e New Youngs
Bay BHdge echoes Younga Bay. mile 0.1.
the Old Youngs Bay BridSe across
Youn Bay, mile 2.4, and the Lewis
and ~sar~ River BridSe ecross the Lowis
and Clark Rivsr, mile 1.0, at Astoria,
Oregon. This cheap would require that
four hours advance notice be given for
opening any of the three drawspans
from 9 p.m. to 5 a.m. This proposal is
being roads becsuss in · period of 30
months, only 19 opmainga were mads
for the passage of vessels during the
cited hotin. This action would relieve .
the owner of the bridges from having a
eraon constantly available st the
Cridges. This change should still
provide for the reasonable needs of
navigation. ----.
DATES: Comments sSould be received
or before ]day 24, t993
ITEM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVA
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning
January 11, 1994
An Interim Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Temecula adopted by
Urgency Measures Requiring a Conditional Use Permit for the Establishment of
Nightclubs, Teen Clubs, Dance Halls, Bars and Cocktail Lounges, Billlard Halls,
Massage Parlors, and Video Game Arcades
Prepared By:
Matthew Fagan, Assistant Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Department Staff recommends that the City
Council:
Issue a report describing the steps taken to address the condition that
resulted in the adoption of the Ordinance; and
2. Adopt an Ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 94-
AN INTERIM ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA REQUIRING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR
THE ESTABLISHMENT OF NIGHTCLUBS, TEEN CLUBS, DANCE
HALLS, BARS AND COCKTAIL LOUNGES, BILLlARD HALLS,
MASSAGE PARLORS, AND VIDEO GAME ARCADES
BACKGROUND
Ordinance No. 93-05, entitled "An Urgency Ordinance of the City Council of the City of
Temecula Declaring a Moratorium on the Establishment of Nightclubs, Teen Clubs, Dance
Halls, Bars and Cocktail Lounges, Billlard Halls, Massage Parlors, and Video Game Arcades
Without a Conditional Use Permit" was adopted by the City Council on February 9, 1993.
Ordinance No. 93-05 was in effect for forty-five (45) days and expired on March 26, 1993.
Ordinance No. 93-07 went into effect on March 26, 1993 for a period of ten months and
fifteen days, and will expire on February 9, 1994. The Ordinance that is before the City
Council would be in effect for one additional year and will expire on February 9, 1995 unless
repealed by the adoption of the City's Development Code.
R:\S\STAFFRF~J'P-ORD.CC 1/3194 tjs
DISCUSSION
Pursuant to Government Code 65858(d), ten days prior to the expiration of an Interim
Ordinance or any extension, the legislative body shall issue a written report describing the
measures taken to alleviate the condition which led to the adoption of the Ordinance. The
Discussion Section of the agenda report shall serve as the written report required pursuant to
State Law.
Extension of Interim Ordinance
Staff is in the process of preparing a permanent Development Code that will be consistent
with the City's General Plan. It is anticipated that uses requiring a Conditional Use Permit
including nightclubs, teen clubs, dance halls, bars and cocktail lounges, billiard halls, massage
parlors, and video game arcades will be addressed in the Code. Staff is now completing its
meetings with the Development Code Advisory Committee and hopes to present the draft
Development Code to the Planning Commission in January. Because of this time frame it is
necessary to extend Ordinance No. 93-07.
Prior to the adoption of Ordinances No. 93-05 and 93-07, the uses which are included in the
Interim Ordinance required only Plot Plan approval under Ordinance No. 348. If one of these
uses was proposed in an existing building, then staff would have processed the request as
a tenant improvement. This would have been an over-the-counter, staff level approval. The
purpose of Interim Ordinance is to require a conditional use permit for these uses. The
conditional use permit process allows the City greater control in order to regulate potentially
sensitive uses and assure their compatibility with adjacent uses.
FISCAL IMPACT
The extension of the Interim Ordinance will not result in any fiscal impacts to the City.
Attachments:
1. Ordinance No. 94- - Page
R:%S%STAFFRPI'%CUP-ORD.CC 1/3/94 tit 2
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
ORDINANCE NO. 94-
R:\S\STAFFRFI~CUI~-ORI).CC 1/3/94
ORDINANCE NO. 94-
AN INTERIM ORDINANCE OF ~ CITY COUNCIL OF
~ CITY OF TEhlECULA REQUIRING A CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT FOR ~ ~T.,-~k.IIT,Tg~ OF
NIGHTCLUKq, Ti~.RN CLUBS, DANCE HALLS, BARS AND ·
COCKT~H, LOUNGES, BILLIARD H~LI~, MASSAGE
PARLORS~ AND VIDEO GAME ARCADES
THY~ CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY OF ~A DOES !tERERy ORDAIN
AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Findings That the Temecula City Council hereby makes the following
findings:
A. That it is the Mission of the City of Temecula to maintain a safe, secure, clean,
healthy and orderly community;
B. That it is necessary to re-examine the regulations of the zoning ordinance relating
to the establishment of nightclubs, teen clubs, dance halls, bars and cooltrail lounges, b'filiard
halls, massage parlors, and video game arcades without a conditional use permit;
C. That in order to m-examine said reguhtion s, a requirement for the approval of
a conditional use permit for the establishment of such uses was adopted pursuant to Ordinances
No. 93-05 and 93-07.
D. That said study had already begun, and that it is necessary, pending completion
of said study and the enactment of regulations based thereon, that the requirement for a
conditional use permit for the establishment of nightclubs, teen clubs, dance halls, bars and
cocktail lounges, billiard halls, massage parlors, and video game arcades be extended;
E. That if such ordinance were not extended, establishment of such nightclubs, teen
clubs, dance halls, bars and cocktail lounges, billinrd halls, massage parlors, and video game
arcades without a conditional use permit would be undertaken that 'may compromise the public
health, safety and weftare.
Section 2. That notwithstanding any provision of the City of Temecula Ordinance 90-04,
during such time as this ordinance is in full force and effect, no person shall establish a
nightclub, teen club, dance hall, bar and cocktail lounge, b'~liard hall, massage parlor, and video
game arcade without a conditional use permit. No officer, employee or agent of the City shah
issue any permit or other enti~ement which would have the effect of allowing a nightclub, teen
club, dance hall, bar and cocktail lounge, billiard hall, massage parlor, and video game arcade
without a conditional use permit, during such time as this ordinance is in full force and effect,
and in addition, any permit or other entitlement issued shall be revoked.
R:\S\STAFFRIvBCUP-ORD.CC 1/3194 ~s 4
Section 3. This Urgency Ordinance is enacted under the authority of the California
Government Code Section 65858 and shall be of no further force and effect twelve (12) months
from February 9, 1994.
Section 4. This Ordinance is adopted pursuant to Government Code Section 65858, is
hereby declared an urgency measure and shall take effect on February 9, 1994.
Section 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Interim Ordinance adopted
by urgency measures and cause copies of this Ordinance to be posted and published as required
by law.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this llth day of January, 1994.
ATIEST:
RON ROBERTS
MAYOR
JUNE S. GBI~RK
CITY Ct~RK
STATE OF CALmORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMF_,CULA )
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Interim Ordinance No. 94- was duly adopted and passed as an urgency measure
at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 11th day of January, 1994, by the following
vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCn~MmMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
XUNE S.
CITY
R:~S\STAFFI,FI~CUP-ORD.CC 13194
ITEM
NO.
18
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPRO~
CITY A'I'I'ORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Gary Thornhill, Director of Plannsng
January 11, 1994
Planning Application No. 93-0179, Amendment No. 1 - Second Unit Permit -
Appeal of Conditions of Approval No. 31 and 42 (requirement for the all-
weather access to the second unit)
Prepared By:
Matthew Fagan, Assistant Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
Planning Department Staff recommends that the City Council:
DIRECT the Planning Commission to consider amending Section 18.28.A.C.(10)
of Ordinance No. 348 pertaining to the type of paving material required for
access to second dwelling units; and
ADOPT Resolution No. 94- , approving the appeal of Planning Application
No. 93-0179, Amendment No. 1, subject to the condition that it comply with
Section No. 18.28.A.C.(10) of Ordinance No. 348, as amended.
BACKGROUND
This item was originally heard by the City Council at their December 14, 1993 meeting.
However, after discussion, the matter was continued until January 11, 1994 with direction
to staff to prepare an amendment to Ordinance No. 348 modifying the definition of a
satisfactory paving surface material for access purposes to second dwelling units.
Planning Staff contacted the Riverside County Fire Department to determine the standard that
they use for all-weather access. Fire Department staff stated that, in this particular instance
they utilized the City of Temecula standards for all-weather access. They also informed Staff
that their major criteria was that a 30,000 pound fire truck be able to have access to the site.
They stated that other types of paving material would be acceptable, but the integrity of their
ability to support the fire truck must be demonstrated in a report by a qualified engineer.
The present access requirement is established in the City Zoning Code (Ordinance 348). In
order to amend the Zoning Code, State Law requires that the Planning Commission must first
consider the matter at a noticed public hearing. After receiving the Commission's
recommendation, and conducting its own hearing, the Council may amend the Zoning Code
accordingly. Staff recommends that the Council direct the Planning Commission to consider
the following amendment (indicated in bold) to Section 18.28.a.c.(10) of Ordinance No. 348:
"Any second unit placed more than 150 feet from a public right-of-way shall be required to
R:~S~.STAFFRFf~179PA93.CC2 113194 idb
provide all-weather access for emergency vehicles from s publicly maintained road. Asphaltic
paving is required for all-weather access; however, this requirement may be waived if all of
the following conditions are met:
A soils report (prepared by s licensed soil or civil engineer) is submitted
to the Department of Public Works for approval. The report shall
determine the stability of the sdls at the project site and contain
recommendations for altamative material types and any associated
drainage facilities that will support a 30,000 pound emergency vehicle.
The applicant records a waiver against the property, releasing the City
of Temecula of any liability in the event that emergency vehicles cannot
utilize the drive lane.
The City of Temecula will not accept or maintain the roadway until it
has been improved to City of Temecula Standards as identified in the
Circulation Element of the General Plan."
The language has been reviewed and approved by the City Attorney and the Department of
Public Works.
Regarding the appeal, Staff recommends that Condition of Approval No. 42 be amended to
include the following language: "An all-weather access road shall be provided along either
Aussie Avenue or Jeffrey Heights Road from Calle Girasol to the proposed driveway to the
site per Ordinance No. 348, or as it may be amended." Staff recommends that Condition of
approval No. 31 (requiring street plans for improvements) remain as written.
FISCAL IMPACT
None.
Attachments:
Resolution No. 94- - Page 3
Conditions of Approval - Page 7
Draft Ordinance No. 94- - Page 15
R:~S~STAFFRF~179PAg~.CC2 1/3/94
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
RESOLUTION NO. 94-
R:\S\STAFFRPT~179PA93.CC2 1/3/94 kib ~
ATTACHMENT NO. I
RESOLUTION NO. 94.-
R:~S~STAPFRPT~I79PA93.CC2 1/3194 klb 3
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
· RESOLUTION NO. ~t-
A RESOLUTION OF ~ CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING ~ APPEAL OF PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. 93-0179, AMENDMENT NO. 1, SUBJECT TO ~ CONDITION
THAT IT COMPLY WITH SECTION NO. 18.28.A.C.(10)OF ORDINANCE
NO. 348 AS AMENDEr} PERTAINING TO 'rv~ DEFINITION OF ALL-
WEATHER ACCESS FOR EMERGENCY VIn~CLF~.
Wt!RRRA. S, Raymond and OdeRe D~robert and MicheHe Hapoit fried Planning
Application No. 93-0179 in accordance with the Riverside County land Use, Zoning, Planning
and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference;
WItRRR&S, said Planning Application was processed in the time and manner prescribed
by State and local law;
WH'EREAS, the Planning Commission considered said Planning Application on
November 1, 1993, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time
interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or in opposition;
V~crEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering aH testimony and
arguments, if any, of all persons deserving to be heard, said Commission considered all facts
relating to Planning Application No. 93-0179, Amendment No. 1;
WHRREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, the Commission approved
said Planning Application;
WI~,RR~S, an appeal of the Planning Commission decision for conditions of approval
pertaining to the definition of all-weather access for emergency vehicles was made in accordance
with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, and Planning Ordinances, which the City has
adopted by reference;
WI~-RR~kS, said Appeal application was processed in the time and manner prescribed
by State and local law;
WtlRREAS, the City Council conducted a public hearing pertaining to said Appeal on
December 14, 1993, at which time Staff was directed to prepare an Amendment to Section No.
18.28.A.C.(10) pertaining to the definition of all-weather access for emergency vehicles; and
WH~,~, the City Council considered said Appeal on January 11, 1994, at a duly
noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time interested persons had an opportunity
to testify either in support or in opposition;
R:\S\STAFFRFrXI79PA93.Ct22 1/3194 klb 4
WHEREAS, the City Council received a copy of the Staff Report regarding the Appeal;
A. The city council, in approving of the proposed Planning Application, makes the
following findings, to wit:
1. The project is consistent with the General Plan.
2. The proposed use or action complies with all other applicable requirements
of state law and local ordinances. The proposed project is consistent with Ordinance No. 348.
The project meets the criteria prescribed under Section 18.28.a. (Second Unit Permit) of
Ordinance No. 348.
3. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the
public health, safety and general weftare; conforms to the logical development of the land and
is compatible with the present and future logical development of the surrounding property. The
project meets the criteria prescribed under Section 18.28.a. (Second Unit Permit) of Ordinance
No. 348. The proposal will not have an adverse effect on surrounding property, because it does
not represent a significant change to the present or planned land use of the area. The project
conforms with applicable land use and development regulations.
4. The proposed project will not have a significant impact on the environment
since the project is a Class 3 Categorical Exemption pursuant tO tile California Environmental
Quality Act.
B. As conditioned pursuant to Section 4, the Planning Application proposed conforms
to the logical development of its proposed site, and is compatible with the present and future
development of the surrounding property.
Section 3. Environmental Compliance. The proposed project will not have a significant
impact on the environment since the project is a Class 3 Categorical Exemption pursuant to the
California Environmental Quality Act.
Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Tcmecula City Council hereby approves
Planning Application No. 93-0179, Amendment No. 1 to construct a second dwelling unit
located at 31550 Calle Gimsol and known as Assessor's Parcel No. 914-480-006 subject to the
following conditions:
A. Exhibit A, attached hereto.
R:~S~STAFl~RI~I/9?A93.CC2 1/3/94 klb B
Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 1 lth day of January, 1994.
RON ROBERTS
MAYOR
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA)
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City
Council of the City of Temecuh at a regular meeting thereof, held on the llth day of January,
1994 by the following vote of the Council:
COUNTERS:
NOES:
COUNCH~MEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
JUNE S. GI~K
CITY CLERK
R:~S\STAFFRFIlI'/gPA93.CC2 1ll/94 k]b [~
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
R:\S~TAl~I79PA93.CC2 lf3/~t lrJb 7
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No. 93-0179, Amendment No.1 - Second Unit Permit
Project Description: A request to construct a new 2,195 square foot dwelling unit on
a parcel which already contains an existing 1,536 square foot structure. The new unit
will become the primary unit end the existing structure will become the secondary unit·
The project is located in the Rural Residential (R-R 2 1/2) zone. The project site is
located at 31550 Calle Girasol.
Assessor's Parcel No.: 914480-006
Approval Date:
Expiration Date:
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
General Requirements
e
The use hereby permitted by this Planning application is to construct a new 2,195
square foot dwelling unit on a parcel which already contains an existing 1,536 square
foot structure. The new unit will become the primary unit and the existing structure
will become the secondary unit.
The permittee shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Temecula, its
agents, officers, and employees from any claims, action, or proceeding against the City
of Temecula or its agents, officers, or employees to attach, set aside, void, or annul,
an approval of the City of Temecula, its advisory agencies, appeal boards, or legislative
body concerning Planning Application No. 93-0179, Amendment No. I - Second Unit
Permit. The City of Temecula will promptly notify the permittee of any such claim,
action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula and will cooperate fully in the
defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the permittee of any such claim, action or
proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the permittee shall not, thereafter,
be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City of Temecula.
The second unit shall be used for family members or rental purposes only and may not
be sold as a separate unit unless the lot is subdivided pursuant to all applicable laws
and local ordinances.
The second unit shall be used as a dwelling unit only, and no businesses or home
occupations of any kind may be conducted from or in the second unit.
This approval shall be valid for five (5) years.
The project shall be consistent with Section 18.28.a of Ordinance No. 348.
The development of the premises shall conform substantially with that as shown on
the site plan marked Exhibit A, or as amended by these conditions.
R:\S\STAFFRPT~I79PA93.CC2 113/94 klb 8
8. Building elevations shall be in substantial conformance with that shown on Exhibit B.
Wood Siding: Earthenware (Frazee 5203 M)
Wood Trim: Candlewax (Frazee 4500 W)
Roof: Composition Shingle
Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project
e
The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or
money order payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Seventy-Eight Dollars
(878.00) County administrative fee to enable the City to file the Notice of
Determination required under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California
Code of Regulations Section 15075. If within .such forty-eight (48) hour period the
applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check required
above, the approval for the project granted herein shall be voided by reason of failure
of condition.
Prior to the Issuance of Grading Permits
10.
Thc applioant shall oomply with Ordinanoo No. 8C3 by paying tho foo rocluirod by that
ordinonoo whioh is basod on (the gross noraago of the paroo~ proposod for
dovolopmont). Should Ordinanoo No. 663 bo ouperoodod by tho provisiono of a I labitat
Conoorvotion Ran prior to tho paymont of tho fooo roquirod by Ordinonoo No. 8~:3, thc
applioont shall pay tho foo roquirod undor tho I lsbitot Conaorvation Ran ac
implomontod by County ordinanoo or rosolution. (Deleted at the Planning Commission
hearing on November 1, 1993).
Prio~ to the Issuance of Building Permits
11.
All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use
allowed by this permit.
BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT
12.
The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions of the 1991 edition of the
Uniform Building, Plumbing and Mechanical; 1990 National Electrical Code; California
Administrative Code Title 24 Energy and Handicapped Regulations and the Temecula
Code.
13. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings prior to submittal for plan review.
14.
The applicant shall provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original
signature on plans submitted for plan review.
15.
The applicant shall provide electrical plan including load calcs and panel schedule,
plumbing schematic and mechanical plan for plan review.
R:~S~STAFFRPT~I79PA93.CC2 1/3194 klb 9
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
The following are the Department of Public Works Conditions of Approval for this project, and
shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All questions regarding the true
meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the appropriate staff person of the Department
of Public Works.
It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the tentative site .plan all existing and
proposed easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage courses, and their
omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and revision.
General Requirements
16.
A Grading Permit for either rough or precise (including all onsite flat work and
improvements) grading shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior
to commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained road right-
of-way.
17.
An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior
to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City
right-of-way.
18.
All improvement plans, grading plans, landscape and irrigation
coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing
contiguous to the site.
plans shall be
improvements
Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits
19.
The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board.
No grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or
the project is shown to be exempt.
20. The Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies:
San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board
Planning Department
Department of Public Works
Riverside County Health Department
Community Services District
General Telephone
Southern California Edison Company
Southern California Gas Company
21.
A Grading Plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by the
Department of Public Works. The plan shall comply with the Uniform Building Code,
Chapter 70, City Standards, and as required in these Conditions of Approval.
R:\S\STAR;1t-w~I791*A93.CC2 1/3/94 kJb 10
32.
The Developer shall construct or post security and an agreement shall be executed
guaranteeing the construction of the following public and private improvements in
conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department
of Public Works.
A. Street improvements
B. Storm drain facilities
C. Sewer and domestic water systems
33. All required fees shall be paid.
Prior to Issuance of Building Permit
34. The Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies:
Riverside County Fire Department
Planning Department
Department of Public Works
35.
All necessary construction or encroachment permits have been
submitted/accomplished to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works.
36. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the Department of Public Works
37.
All building pads shall be certified by a registered Civil Engineer for location and
elevation, and the Soil Engineer shall issue a Final Soils Report addressing compaction
and site conditions.
38.
The Developer shall deposit with the Engineering Department a cash sum as
established per acre/unit as mitigation for traffic signal impact.
39.
The Developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities
imposed upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public facility
mitigation as required under the EIR/Negative Declaration for the project. The fee to
be paid shall be in the amount in effect at the time of payment of the fee. If an interim
or final public facility mitigation fee or district has not been finally established by the
date on which the Developer requests its building permit for the project or any phase
thereof, the Developer shall execute the Agreement for payment of Public Facility fee,
a copy of which has been provided to the Developer. Concurrently, with executing
this Agreement, the Developer shall post a bond to secure payment of the Public
Facility fee. The amount of the bond shall be 92.00 per square foot, not to exceed
e 10,000. The Developer understands that said Agreement may require the payment
of fees in excess of those now estimated (assuming benefit to the project in the
amount of such fees). By execution of this Agreement, the Developer will waive any
right to protest the provisions of this Condition, of this Agreement, the formation of
R:'xS',..~TAFFR.P~!79PA93.CC2 1/3/94 klb 12
any traffic impact fee district, or the process, levy, or collection of any traffic
mitigation or traffic impact fee for this project; provided that the Developer is not
waiving its right to protest the reasonableness of any traffic impact fee, and the
amount thereof.
Prior to Issuance of Certification of Occupancy
40. The Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies:
Rancho California Water District
Eastern Municipal Water District
General Telephone
Southern California Edison
Southern California Gas
Planning Department
Department of Public Works
41.
All improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and City
standards, including but not limited to curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive
approaches, parkway trees, street lights on all interior public streets, signing, striping,
traffic signal interconnect, and traffic signals.
42.
Adequate right-of-way shall be dedicated along Jeffrey Heights Road and Aussie
Avenue to provide for a 60 foot full width right-of-way including a cul-de-sac at their
termini and recluired corner property line cut off in accordance with City Standards.
An all-weather access road shall be provided along either Aussie Avenue or Jeffrey
Heights Road from Calle Girasol to the proposed driveway to the site per Ordinance
No. 348, or as it may be amended.
The driveway and the access to the site shall be designed and constructed relative to
the ultimate design of Aussie Avenue including a turn around per City standards at the
terminus.
In order to provide for a paved section along Aussie Avenue, the improvements shall
accommodate the natural drainage course crossing the-road. All necessary permits
shall be obtained from appropriate agencies; i.e. the Department of Fish and Game,
Army Corps. of Engineers, and Regional Water Quality Control Board.
43.
In the event road or off-site right-of-way are required to comply with these conditions,
such easements shall be obtained by the Developer; or, in the event the City is required
to condemn the easement or right-of-way, as provided in the Subdivision Map Act, the
Developer shall enter into an agreement with the City for the acquisition of such
easement at the Developer's cost pursuant to Government Code Section 66462.5,
which shall be at no cost to the City.
R:\S\STAFFRPT~I79PA93.CC2 1/3/94 klb 13
OTHER AGENCIES
44.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Rancho
California Water District transmittal dated October 14, 1993, a copy of which is
attached.
45.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Riverside County
Health Department transmittal dated October 1, 1993, a copy of which is attached.
46.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Riverside County
Fire Department transmittal dated October 25, 1993, a copy of which is attached.
R:~S\STAFFRPT~179PA93.CC2 1/3194 klb 14
ancho
Wmr
Board or Directors:
Dou~ Kulb~rg
Prt~a~nt
~e~rey L, ~[in~er
$r. Vice PNsi~nt
~ph H. Daily
~an~ ~ Huffhe
C~bm F, So
Lia D, Peteran
Rich~ D. StetTey
Olllcers:
Jehn F. Fiennillar
General .%[anaeer
Phillip L, Forbes
Dirt, vtor ,ff Finant'e-
Treu.~urt, r
E. P. 'l)oh" Lemons
Kenneth C. Denly
& Masnten:ant'e
Pert!.° Ft. Luuek
C,mtrn|ler
Linda .%1. Fre!~oso
· Jennin~(s. F'ngstrnnd
& }Jenrikson
October 14, 1993
R- CEIV'-"D
OCT 18 15S3
Mr. Matthew Fagan
City of Temecula
Planning Department
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590-3606
SUBJECT:
Water Availability
APN 914-480-006, PA93-0179
Second Unit Permit
Dear Mr. Fagan:
Please be advised that the above-referenced property is located within the
boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RC%VD). Water service,
therefore, would be available upon completion of financial arrangements between
RCWD and the property owner.
Water availability would be contingent upon the property owner signing an
Agency Agreement which assigns water management rights, if any, to RCWD.
If you have any questions, please contact Ms. Senga Dohert!/.
Sincerely,
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT
Steve Brannon, P.E.
Development Engineering Manager
SB:S0:eb08/F186
cc: Senga Doherty, Engineering Technician
Ranchn Lalifomia Wntt, r Di~tr:et
jJ~,..;l llhzll..,d * :'-t,"llk.t. il,~tNe:7 * T...::.~!:Lt.C.,;:'~,r.-.i.~'J'-~-:.,I~.' * ~,1+;,,;7,~-411)1 * F":':
TO:
FROM
RE:
County of Riverside
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING DEPT.
Matthew F
,~T~:nhew r n~
MAK en Health Specialist IV
SECOND UNIT PERMIT NO. PA93-0179
DATE: October 1, 1993
RECEIVED
CO! 5 1993
J~Bs'd ..............
The Dcpa~uuent of Environmental Health has reviewed the Second Unit Permit No. PA93-0179 and will
require the following items PRIOR TO BUILDING PLAN APPROVAL:
Adequate/satisfactory detailed soils percolation testing in accordance with the pro~dures outlined in the
Rivehide County Waste Disposal Booklet entitled *Waste Disposal for Individual Homes, Commercial
and Industrial.
2. A "will-serve" letter for potable water from the appropriate agency providing water service.
3. Three detailed drawn to scale (1 "=20') of the proposed subsurface sewage disposaJ system and floor
plan/plumbing schedule to ensure septic rank sizing.
SM:dr
(909) 275-8980
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
FIRE DEPARTh/ENT
210 WEST SAN JACIFTO AVENUE * PERilS, Cexr rgrORNIA 92570 · (909) 657-3183
October 25, 1993
T0: P!an~ing Department
ATTEN: Matthew Fagan
RE: PA93-0179
With respect to the conditions of approval for the above referenced
second unit permit, The Fire Department recoaattends the following
fire protection measures be provided in accordance with the City of
Temecula Ordinances and/or recognized fire protection standards:
The water mains shall be a minimum of 6" diameter and shall be
capable of providing a potential fire flow of 500 GPM for 2 hour
duration at 20 PSI residual operating pressure
The re_quired fire flow shall be available from a standard fire
hydrant (6"x4"x2 1/2") within 500 feet of the property.
The applicant/developer shall be responsible to submit written
certification from the water company noting location of the
existing fire hydrant and the existing water system is capable of
delivering 500 GPM fire flow for a 2 hour duration at 20 PSI
residual operating pressure. If a water system currently does not
exist, the applicant/developer shall be responsible to provide
written certification that financial arrangements have beenmade to
provide them.
The re,cuired water system, including fire hydrants, shall be
installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any
combustible building materials being placed on the job site.
Driveways over 150 feet in length shall have a turn around' at the
second unit, capable of accoaa:~odating fire apparatus.
Any secondunit placed more than 150 feet from any public right-of-
way shall be required to provide an all-weather access for
emergency vehicles. Access shall not have an up or down grade of
more than !5%. Access will not be less than 12 feet in width and
will have a vertical clearance of 13'6" Access will be free of
sharp confined turns. Access will be designed to withstand the
weight of any type of emergency vehicle. Access will have a
turning radius of 45 feet capable of accommodating fire apparatus.
FIRE PREVEN~ON DIVISION
~ RIVERSIDE OF~CE PLANNING SECTION ~ INDIO OFFICE
37~ 12th St~t, Riv~ide. CA 92501 79-733 Count~ Club D~ve, Suitu F, lndio, CA 92201
(909) 275~7~ · FAX (909) 369-74~1 (619) 863-8886 * FAX (6 19) 863-7072
All buildings shall be constructed with fire retardant roofing
material as described in Section 3203 of the UniformBuilding Code.
Any wood shingles or shakes shall be a Class "B" rating and shall
be approved by the fire Department prior to installation.
Street address shall be posted, in a visible location, minimum 4
inches in height, on the street side of the building with a
contrasting background.
Prior to 'the issuance of building permits, the developer shall
deposit, with the City of Temecula, the sum of $400.00 per unit
mitigation for fire protection impacts.
All questions regarding the meaning of these conditions shall be
referred to the Fire Department Planning and engineering section.
RAYMOND H. REGIS
Chief Fire Department Planner
Laura Cabral
Fire Safety Specialist
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
DRAFT ORDINANCE NO. 94-
R:\S~qTAFF'RPT~I79PA93.CC2 1/3/94 kib '] 5
ATrACttlVtnNT NO. 3
ORDINANCE NO. 94-
AN'ORDINANCE OF TIff. CITY COUNCIL OF CITY OF
TII~!ECULA, AMk'INDING SECTION NO. 18.28.A.C.(10) OF
ORDINANCE NO. 348 PERTAINING TO THt TYPE OF
PAVING MATERIAL REQUIREu FOR ACCESS TO
SECOND DWELLING UNITS
TIff. CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY OF TEMECULA, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. City Ordinance No. 90-04 adopted by reference certain portions Of the Non-
Codified Riverside County Ordinances, including Ordinance No. 348. Section 18.28.a.c.(10)
of Ordinance No. 348 is hereby amended to read as follows:
(10)
Any second unit placed more than 150 feet from a public right-of-way shall be
required to provide all-weather access for emergency vehicles from a publicly
maintained mad. Asphaltic paving is required for all-weather access; however,
this requirement may be waived if all of the following conditions are met:
A so~s report (prepared by a licensed soil or civil engineer) is submitted
to the Department of Public Works for approval. The report shah
determine the stability of the soils at the project site and contain
recommendations for alternative material types and any associated
drainage facilities that will support a 30,000 pound emergency vehicle.
The applicant records a waiver, releasing the City of Temecula of any
liability in the event that emergency vehicles cannot utilize the drive lane.
Ce
The City of Temecula will not accept or maintain the roadway until it has
been improved to the City of Temecula Standards as identified in the
Circulation Element of the General Plan.
Section 2. Severability. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this
Ordinance is severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shah hold any
sentence, paragraph, or section of this ordinance to be invalid, such decisions shall not affect
the validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance.
Section 3. Notice of Adoption. Within 10 days after the adoption hereof, the City Clerk
of the City of Temecula shah certify to the adoption of this ordinance and cause it to be posted
in at least three public places in the City.
Section 4. Taking Effect. This ordinance shall take effect 30 days after the date of its
adoption.
R:~S\STAFFRFI~I79PA93.CC2 1/3/94 Idb I 6
PASSE1), APPROVED AND ADOPTED this __ day of ,199_.
RON ROBERTS
MAYOR
ATTBST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
STATE OF CALH~ORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss
CITY OF TEMF~)
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Ordinance No. 94--- was duly introduced and placed upon its fLrSt reading at a regular
meeting of the City Council on the __ day of , 199_, and that thereafter, said
Ordinance was duly adopted and passed a regular meeting of the City Council on the __th day
of __, 1994 by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCH.M]IMBERS:
COUNCH~MEMBERS:
COUNCH,MEMBERS:
APPROV~',r. AS TO FORM:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
Scott F.Field
City Attorney
R:\S\STAFFRFr%I79PA93.CC2 1/3/94 klb ] 7
ITEM NO.
19
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
City Clerk
January 11, 1993
Planning Commission Appointment
APPROE~~(
CITY ATTORN
FINANCE OFFI
RECOMMENDATION: Review the Ad-Hoc Committee recommendations and appoint one
applicant to fill an unexpired term (ending June 4, 1994) on the Temecula Planning
Commission.
BACKGROUND: Pursuant to Council's adopted policy and procedure for making
appointments and re-appointments, the term of Commissioner Dennis Chiniaeff, who resigned,
was advertised in two local newspapers of general circulation. The applications received were
forwarded to the Council's Ad-Hoc committee members for the Planning Commission, and
Councilmembers Parks and Mu~oz have submitted the following recommendations:
Councilmember Parks recommends the appointment of Rick Soltysiak.
Councilmember Mu~oz recommends the appoinment of Arthur W. Salyer.
Attached are copies of the applications which were received by the filing deadline of May 4,
1993.
ATTACHMENTS: Copies of Applications for Appointment
CITY OF TEMECULA
APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO COMMISSION
Qudiftatiet Requirement: Realdam of City of TeNcub
COMMISSION ON WHICH YOUWISH TO SERVE:
Planning Commission
NAME: Rich bol'uysia~
ADDRESS: 30519 Wailea Court
YEARSRESIDENT
OF TEMECULA: 7
HOME PHONE: WORK PHONE:
676-1470 676-1470
OCCUPATION: '
Civil Engineering Consultant
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND/DEGREES:
BS/CE Marquette University, Milwaukee, Wisconsin - 1979
Registered Civil Engineer, State of California - 1983
LIST ANY RIVERSIDE COUNTY OR OTHER CITY COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION ON WHICH
YOU HAVE SERVED AND THE YEAR OF SERVICE:
Temecula and Murrieta Coordinating Committee since 1991
ORGANIZATIONS TO WHICH YOU BELONG: (Professional, technical, community, service):
Murrieta Chamber of Commerce/Temecula-Murrieta Economic Development
Corporation
BRIEFLY ,STATE WHY YOU WISH TO SERVE ON THIS COMMISSION, AND WHY YOU
BELIEVE YOU ARE QUALIFIED FOR THE POSITION. BE SPECIFIC IUse additional paper ~
necessary):
See Attached
I understand that arty or dl kdo,,, ti~ on this form may be verified. I curtsam to the release of this
PLEASE NOTE: Applications will be kept on file for cormiderrdon of future vacancies.
Retum to: City Clerk's Office, 43174 Business Park Drive, Ta.,acula, CA 92390 (714) 694-1989
2/forms/COM-O01
DESIRE TO SERVE ON PLANNING COMMISSION
I consider myself fortunate to have lived and worked in the
Temecula area since 1986. During these past seven years my family
and I have established both professional and social roots within
the community. During this period I have also developed a sense of
civic pride and would be honored to serve on the Planning
Commission and assist in making decisions which play a role in
shaping our city's future.
Serving on the Planning Commission would provide me the opportunity
to contribute back to the community. My professional background
qualifies me to make informed decisions on complex development
issues the Commission often faces. I believe well planned and
organized growth are essential elements to ensuring the future
success of our young city.
OUALIFICATIONS TO SRRVE ON PT.ANNING COMMISSION
My professional background, centered around civil engineering,
ranges from experience as a County Civil Engineer, to Director of
Engineering in a consulting firm, to Project Manager in a land
development company. Currently I am the sole proprietor of my own
consulting firm.
With previous experience as both a consultant and project manager
in land development; I have addressed planning commissions, city
councils, and county boards of supervisors on many applications for
land development. I have extensive experience in the overall land
development process from entitlements to construction.
Having worked with all the local servicing agencies on many
projects, I also understand local agency project requirements and
how they relate to the land division phase in an effort to ensure
necessary infrastructure to adequately support the individual
project demands.
My professional experiences with property within the Temecula city
limits all occurred prior to city incorporation. Additionally, all
my current professional service contracts are either capital
improvement projects with the City of Murrieta, or County of
Riverside, or involve private development outside the City of
Temecula. Therefore, I am also able to serve with no foreseeable
conflicts of interest.
CITY OF TEMECULA
APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO COMMIS~I ~N
Qualification ReQuirement: Resident of City of Temecula
COMMISSION ON WHICH YOU WISH TO SERVE:
NAME: 't~r'Fkul' uJ.
ADDRESS:
HOME PHONE:
OCCUPATION:
EMPL O ~ERI ADDRESS :
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND/DEGREES:
YEARS RESIDENT
OF TEMECULA: ~ ~///~_
WORK PHONE 3'o
LIST ANY RIVERSIDE COUNTY OR OTHER CITY COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION ON WHICH
YOU HAVE SERVED AND THE YEAR OF SERVICE:
ORGANIZATIONS TO WHICH YOU BELONG: (Professional, technical, community, service):
BRIEFLY STA~ WHY YOU WISH TO SERVE ON THIS COMMISSION, AND WHY YOU
BELIEVE YOU ARE QUALIFIED FOR THE POSITION. BE SPECIFIC (Use additional paper H
I understand that any or all information on this form may be verifmd. I c~nsent to the release of this
P~Lr~c'.~2~pliCat~s w ' ~ pt on/lie for consi'~tion ~f fitture vacancies.
Return to: City Clerk's Office, 4317~~elss Park Drive, Temecula, CA 92390 (714) 694-1989
2/forms/COM-O01
Arthur W. Salyer
I feel that I am capable of serving the City of Temecula on
the Planning Commission for the following reasons:
EDUCATION
I have an undergraduate degree in engineering. This Will
allow me to understand the technical complexities of plans.
zone changes, and technical information utilized. I also
have Masters Degree in Business Administration. This will
allow me to better understand the business aspects of the
various proposals.
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
I have 20 years of increasingly levels of experience in
industry. I have built and operated a number of factories
in various parts of the country. I understand what it
takes to be successful in business. Managing factories in
small and large towns has allowed me to truly understand
the need of balance between commercial growth and the
quality of community life. I understand the need for
balance between commercial and housing development. I
understand the need to provide both housing opportunities
for all parts community irregardless of personal financial
resources. A key element to running a successful
manufacturing operations is long and short range planning.
These skills will help me to understand and effectively
deal with the complexities of community planning.
INDEPENDENCE
I am not affiliated with any potential special interest
group in the community. My business affiliations are all
~n Les Angeles County. The only property I own or intend
to own in the Temecula area is my personal home. This will
allow me to be true independent in decision making. I can
work with all of the factions incorporating them into an
effective community plan. My lack of active' affiliations
in other community groups will allow to commit the time to
the Planning Commission.
COMMITMENT TO THE COMMUNITY
I have lived in Temecula for 3 1/2 years. I have three
children. I am committed to insuring that the quality of
our community continues.
PERSONAL PHILOSOPHY
I believe in the value of balance in planning. We need to
balance the needs of all the factions in the community:
Agriculture, Commercial, Industrial, Government, and
Housing. Each of these factions need to have a well
planned and understood role in community planning for our
area to grow strong.and secure. No single faction can be
allowed to dominate the planning strategy. All must be
integrated.
It is t'he function of the Planning Commission to represent
all of the members of our community fairly. Good long term
planning is essential to maintain the prosperity and life
style of the community.
Thank you for y.,o~r consideration.
Arthur W. Sa~'yer
Ouadifw, ation Requbs,,.e~st: lice|dent of City of Temecula
COMMISSION ON WHICH YOU WISH TO SERVE:
PLANNING
NAME: RON WALTON
ADDRESS: 30075 YNF.,Z ROAD
TE2~CU~, CA
HOME PHONE:
694-0324
OCCUPATION: RESTAURANTEUR AND REAL ESTATE BROKER
EMPLOYER/ADDRESS:
TEXAS LIL'S , 28495 FRONT STREET, OLD TOWN TEMECUI.A
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND/DEGREES:
WORK PHONE:
YEARS RESIDENT
OF TEMECULA: 4½
677-3345
TWO YEAR COLLEGE
LIST ANY RIVERSIDE COUNTY OR OTHER CITY COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION ON WHICH
YOU HAVE SERVED AND THE YEAR OF SERVICE:
OLD TOWN TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE
ORGANIZATIONS TO WHICH YOU BELONG: IProfessiond, technical, community, service):
RANCHO-TEMECULA-MURRIETA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS, CALIFORNIA RESTAURANT
ASSOCIATION
BRIEFLY. STATE WHY YOU WISH TO SERVE ON THIS COMMISSION, AND WHY YOU
T~T~Ec~3~IVELY FOLLOWED THE FORMATION AND GROWTH OF THE ~ITY TO DATE. I HAVE OBSERVED
DIRECTION IN WHICH THE CITY SHOULD BE HEADING. SINCE .I OWN OR FRANCHISE OTHER
BUSINESSES IN TORRANCE, FULLERTON WESTMINSTF~ NORCO, AND MORENO VALLEY, I HAVE HAD
A LOT OF EXPERIENCE IN DEALING WI~H THOSE VARIGUS PLANNING COMMISSIONS AND THE PUBLIC
AT LARGE. I HAVE UTMOST RESPECT AND UNDERSTANDING OF THE RESPONSIBILITY PLACED ON
A PLANNING COMMISSIONER. I BELIEVE MY BUSINESS AND REAL ESTATE BACKGROUND WILL
SERVE AS MY QUALIFICATION FOR THIS POSITION.
! unders.tand . ~ on th, is form my be vedfkid. I consent to 1he release of this
·'<,u, :
Return to: City Clerk'$ Office, 43174 Busbess lark Drive, Te.,~e:c!a, CA 92390 (714) 694-1989
2/forme/COM-O01
CITY OF TEMECULA
APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO COMMISSION
Qualiftation Requirement:
COMMISSION ON WHICH YOU WISH TO SERVE:
NAME: Timothy Jay Nillet
ADDRESS: 45052 Corte Bella Donna
699-7133
'HOME PHONE:
OCCUPATION:
Attorney at law
EMPLOYER/ADDRESS: 27349 Jefferson Avenue,
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND/DEGREES:
B.S Accounting - USC 1961
Llb. - USC '1964
Resident of City of Temecule
Planning
YEARS RESIDENT
OF TEMECULA:
WORK PHONE: 699 - 9966
Suite 105 Temecula
LIST ANY RIVERSIDE COUNTY OR OTHER CITY COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION ON WHICH
YOU HAVE SERVED AND THE YEAR OF SERVICE:
None
ORGANIZATIONS TO WHICH YOU BELONG:lProfessional, technicel, community, sewice):
State BAR, Riverside County BAR
BRIEFLY STATEWHY YOUWISH TO SERVE ON THIS COMMISSION, AND WHY YOU
BELIEVE YOU ARE QUALIFIEDFOR THE POS~ION. BE SPE~FIC (Ueeadd~nal paper ~
necessa~): I have a personal interest in good planning. I would
enjoy being involved with the planning process and having an ability
Having practiced real estate law for r I believe I
would bring another dimension to the Planning Commission as it is
presently configureC.
CITY OF TEMECULA
APPUCATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO COMMISSIC
Qualification Requiremere: Re,lent of City of TeNcub
COMMISSION ON WHICH YOU WISH TO SERVE:
NAME: Lorin D. Phipps
ADDRESS: 34670 Capitol Street
HOME PHONE?Cmocula' C-lif_ 92j92
(909) 699-9810
OCCUPATION:
Planning Commission
YEARS RESIDENT 4½
OF TEMECULA:
WORK PHONE:
(909)694-4128
Real estate salesman and General Contractor
EMPLOYER/ADDRESS:
27715 Jefferson Ave. Suite 113 Temecula, Ca. 92590
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND/DEGREES:
B.A. degree PoliticalScience
LIST ANY RIVERSIDE COUNTY OR OTHER CITY COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION ON WHICH
YOU HAVE SERVED AND THE YEAR OF SERVICE:
N/~,
ORGANIZATIONS TO WHICH YOU BELONG: (l~ofessionel, technical, community, seNice):
~.C.A _ m,O e. - O.N.P.R.A. - Chri~t's Church
BRIEFLY STATE WHY YOU WISH TO SERVE ON THIS COMMISSION, AND WHY YOU
BELIEVE YOU ARE QUALIFIED FOR THE POSITION. BE SPE~RC (UM edd~ion~ laHr ff
necesssW): I am a native born Californian who has resided in California on
a permanent basis. I have seen the development of many cities, being
involved in the construction business for the past 31 years. I plan
to live the balance of my life in Temecula. I Know how important
planning decisions are in the future development of the character and
living environment of a city. I believe I can provide an educated
and professional approach that will help the majority of our residents
have a fine city in which to live for many years to come.
lunde~tend ~s~yordlbfommtao~o, ffib b~meybewe~Fmd. l~e~t~the~esse ~ ~b
information for publicity os~s.
SE NO will be conskieratimt of future vBcancies.
Retum to: City Clerk's Office, 43174 !kebe~ Park Drive, Temecula, CA 92390 (714) 694-1989
2/fom~lCOM-O01
CITY OF TEMECULA
APPUCATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO COMMISSIO I
Qualification Requirement:
COMMISSI~:)~ ON WHICH YOU WISH TO SERVE:
NAME:
ADDRESS:
HOME PHONE:
Resident of City of Temecule
YEARS RESIDENT
OF TEMECULA:
WORK PHONE: ~,f-~- ,.,";e,. Z" ~
OCCUPATION:
EMPLOYER/ADDRESS:
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND/DEGREES:
LIST ANY RIVERSIDE COUNTY OR OTHER CITY COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION ON WHICH
YOU HAVE SERVED AND THE YEAR OF SERVICE:
ORGANIZATIONS TO WHICH YOU BELONG: (l~ofessional, technical, community, service):
BRIEFLY STATE WHY YOU WISH TO SERVE ON THIS COMMlISION, AND WHY YOU
BELIEVE YOU ARE QUALIFIED FOR THE POSITION. BE SPECIFIC (Use additional paper if
I understand that any or all information on this form may be verified. I consent to the release of this
information for publicity purposes.
~'N~f%~l,%
SIGNATURE: ~ ~,~,,~-,\ DATE: ,' [--Z- ~
/
2/forme/COM-O01
CITY OF TEMECULA
APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO COMMISSI(~~,
Oualif~,atjon Requirement: rlesidt:~t of City of Teacub
COMMISSION ~N V~IICH YOU WISH TO SERVE:
NAME: ~.' :~c,,/L ~. 2i~c-~ .^ _~.
HOME PHONE: ~J ~, ~- ~1 /
YEARS RESIDENT
OF TEMECULA:
WORK PHONE:
OCCUPATION: ~e T/'t{ d ~: e~'/'~ C. ro ,,:., ,.z 2e //e/,t:~ c_l,L L: o ~:::~, u2.? y~, ~. ,.fev3 y ,.r t_'
EMPLOYER!~kDDRESS:
A//'~ o
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND/DEGREES: ,~", 11 ~r,_J~ ~ ~.. y~ ~. - -
LIST ANY RIVERSIDE COUNTY OR OTHER CITY COMMITFEE OR COMMISSION ON WHICH
YOU HAVE SERVED AND THE YEAR OF SERVICE:
ORGANIZATIONS TO WHICH YOU BELONG: IProf, eeaional, technical, community, serviceh
BRIEFLY STATE WHY ~;3~LI WISH TO SERVE ON T
N, AND WHY YOU
BELIEVE YOU ARE QUALIFIED FOR THE POSITION. BE S~CIFIC IUse additional paper if
information for publicity purposes.
-- 6
(714) 694-1989
2/foffns/COM-O01
CITY OF TEMECULA
APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO COMMISSION
Qualification Requirement: ResMent of City of Temecub
COMMISSION ON WHICH YOU WISH TO SERVE:
NAME:
ADDRESS: Chris Martinelli
30255 Corte Cantania
HOME PHONE:
909-694-0853
OCCUPATION:
part-time marketing
EMPLOYER/ADDRESS: "
Analytic Artistry Inc. 30255
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND/DEGREES:
YEARS RESIDENT
OF TEMECULA:
Temecula CA 92591
WORK PHONE:
9n9-695-1007
co-ordinator for an engineering software
Corte Cantania Temecula CA 92591
CO.
Bachelor's Degree in Business Administration, CSULB
Graduate of the Realtors' Institute. GRI designation
LIST ANY RIVERSIDE COUNTY OR OTHER CITY COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION ON WHICH
YOU HAVE SERVED AND THE YEAR OF SERVICE:
Get A Grip Committee-1993
Traffic Subcommitte of General Plan, 1992-3
ORGANIZATIONS TO WHICH YOU BELONG: IProfessional. tech, ical. community. service):
Chairman, Temecula Neighborhood Watch
~ Community Partnership-anti-drug//
BRIEFLY STATE WHY YOU WISH TO SERVE ON 1'HIS COMMISSION, AND WHY VOsubstance
BELIEVE YOU ARE QUALIFIED FOR THE POSITION. BE SPECIFIC (Use additional paper abuse
necessaW):
Please see attached sheet mmittee
I understand that any or all infoffnation on this form may be verified. I consent to the release of this
· ' r ic, purposes.DATE
Return to: City Cterk's Office, 43174 Business Perk Drive, Temecula, CA 92390 {714) 694-1989
2/fonl~e/COIV~X) l
June Greek
City Clerk, City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula Ca 92591
11/17/93
Dear Ms. Greek,
Enclosed is my application for a position on the.Planning Commis-
sion.
I believe that I am qualified for this position because of my
educational, business, and personal credentials. In 1982 I gradu-
ated (with honors) from California State University at Long Beach
with a bachelor's degree in business administration. I have taken
numerous courses in law, contracts, management, group dynamics,
real estate, economics, and the like. My past experience as a
real estate agent gives insight into land use issues. As a co-
owner of a small corporation in this city, I am aware of many of
the economic issues that businesses face.
Before moving to Temecula in late 1990, my family studied all of
Southern California, looking for that ideal mix of demographics,
"community spirit", economic potential, and climate. We are
happy we chose the city of Temecula and plan to live here for
many many years. I want to serve on the Planning Commission be-
cause I care about the city and want to make a contribution to
its future.
I am very active in the community and have artended many differ-
ent commission and city council meetings and thus have an under-
standing of how the city "works."
Since I have no children living at home, and am self-employed, I
am able and willing to devote the twelve to fifteen hours per
meeting to read, research, and visit the sites as required to
perform my duties. I will listen to all input and try to make
informed decisions.
Best regards,
Chris Martinelli
cc: City Council Members
Planning Commission Members
ITEM 20
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
City Manager/City Council
FROM:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
DATE:
January 11, 1994
SUBJECT:
Ordinance Adopting Temecula Municipal Code
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 94-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA,
ADOPTING THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE
Direct the City Clerk to schedule a public hearing to be held on January 25, 1994
which includes consideration of the adoption of the Temecula Municipal Code and the
following secondary codes:
C®
Ee
G.
H.
Riverside County Ordinances adopted by reference;
Uniform BuildinQ Code, 1991 Edition with appendices in California State
Amendments.
Uniform BuildinQ Codes Standards, 1991 Edition
Uniform Mechanical Code 1991 Edition, with appendices in California State
Amendments.
Uniform Plumbino Code, 1991 Edition, with appendices in California State
Amendments.
Uniform Administrative Code, 1991 Edition.
Uniform Code for the Abatement of Danoerous Buildinas, 1991 Edition.
Uniform Housing Code, 1991 Edition; and
Uniform Swimmine Pools. SPa and Hot Tub Code, 1991 Edition
BACKGROUND: The City Clerk, working with the City Attorney's office and the 'firm of
Book Publishing Company of Seattle, Washington has completed the task of editing, compiling
and publishing the permanent and general ordinances of the City of Temecula in a document
R:~Oe~ikrpt%mufdcede 1
AGENDA REPORT - Adoption of Municipal Code
January 11, 1994
Page 2.
to be known as the Temecula Municipal Code. This process has resulted in a single loose-leaf
reference book which sets forth the existing body of law in chapter fashion.
Government Code Section 50022.6 requires that true and correct copies of the Codes to be
adopted by reference be available at least 15 days prior to a public hearing to consider
adoption of the Ordinance. The required advertising has been placed, to meet the 15 day
publication requirements, therefore the public hearing as required by the code and the second
reading can accomplished at the meeting of January 25, 1994.
After adoption of the Municipal Code, all future City ordinances will be forwarded to Book
Publishing Company who will continue with the compilation and who will issue annual or
semi-annual supplements which can be inserted into the code book binders. These
supplements will also include revised index pages.
JSG
R:~eende.retVnunk:ele 2
ORDINANCE NO. 94-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA, ADOPTING THE TEMECULA
MUNICIPAL CODE.
WHEREAS, the City of Temecula has contracted with Book Publishing Company (BPC),
Seattle, Washington to compile, edit and publish a codification of the permanent and general
ordinances of the City of Temecula; and
WHEREAS, there is now, on file in the office of the City Clerk for public inspection,
one copy of a document en~~ed Temecula Municipal Code;"
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN
AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Adoption There is hereby adopted the "Temecula Municipal Code," as
compiled, edited and published by BPC.
Section 2. Title-Citation-Reference This code shall be known as the Temecula
Municipal Code and it shall be sufficient to refer to said code as the "Temecula Municipal Code"
in any prosecution for the violation of any provision thereof or in any proceeding at law or
equity. It shall be sufficient to designate any ordinance adding to, amending, correcting or
repealing all or any part or portion thereof as an addition to, amendment to, correction or repeal
of the Temecula Municipal Code. Further reference may be had to the rifles, chapters, sections
and subsections of the Temeeula Municipal Code and such references shall apply to that
numbered rifle, chapter, section or subsection as it appears in the code.
Section 3. Reference Applies to All Amendments. Whenever a reference to this code
as the "-Temecula Municipal Code" or to any portion thereof, or to any ordinance of the City
of Temecula, codified herein, the reference shall apply to all amendments, corrections and
additions heretofore, now or hereafter made.
Section 4. Title. Chapter and Section Headings. Title, chapter and section headings
contained herein shall not be deemed to govern, limit, modify or in any manner affect the scope,
meaning or intent of the provisions of any rifle, chapter or section hereof.
Section 5. Reference to Specific Ordinances. The provisions of this code shall not
in any manner affect matters of record which refer to, or are otherwise connected with
ordinances which are therein specifically designated by number or otherwise and which are
included within the code, but such reference shall be construed to apply to the corresponding
provisions contained within this code.
5\ords\60 I
Section 6. Ordinances l~.~edvl Prior to Adoption of the Code. The last ordinance
inchded in this code was Ordinance93-16 passed August 24, 1993. The following ordinances,
passed subsequent to Ordinance 93-16, but prior to adoption of this code, are hereby adopted
and made a pan of this Code: Ordinances 93-17, 93-18, 93-19, 93-20 and 93-21.
Section 7. ~ffect of Code on Past Actions and Obligations. The adoption of this code
does not affect prosecutions for ordinance viohtions committed prior to the effective date of this
code, does not waive any fee or penalty due and unpaid on the effective date of this code, and
does not affect the validity of any bond or cash deposit posted, filed or deposited pursuant to the
requirements of any ordinance.
Section 8. ConstitutionaiRy. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase
of this code is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect
the validity of the remaining portions of this code.
Section 9. Taking Effect. This ordinance shall take effect 30 days after the date of its
adoption.
PASSED, APPROVEI~ AND ADOPTED this day of
,1994.
ATTEST:
, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
5~ds~60 2
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA)
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Ordinance No. 94- was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a
regular meeting of the City Council on the day of January, 1994, and that thereafter, said
Ordinance was duly adopted and pa~sed a regular meeting of the City Council. on the day
of January, 1994 by the following roll call vote:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
5~orda~O 3
ITEM NO. 21
ITEM NO. 22
APPROVAL ~,~
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICE
CITY MANAGER ·
CITY OF TEMECULA
STAFF REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Attorney/City Manager
Scott F. Field, City Attorney
January 11, 1994
Paloma del Sol: Agreement Between KDRC, Inc. and City Regarding
Acceptance of Park, Approval of Final Tract Map No. 24135-3 and
Modification of Target Density for Planning Area 6
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the Agreement between Kemper
Real Estate Development Company and the City of Temecula regarding Paloma del Sol.
DISCUSSION: The proposed Agreement is intended to resolve three related disputes
between the City and Kemper regarding Paloma del Sol.
First, the Development Agreement for Paloma del Sol provides for the dedication and
improvement of parks, paseos and open space to the City in lieu of parkland dedication
pursuant to the City's Quimby Ordinance. In particular, the Development Agreement
provided for the dedication and improvement of an 8 acre Park to the City at the
intersection of Campanule and De Portola Ways. (During the final design phase of the
Park, its size increased to 9.5 acres). The Park is now complete and ready for acceptance.
However, Staff has delayed acceptance of the Park until an Assessment District 159 lien
of $633,000 is removed from the property. Kemper has taken the position that the City
should accept the Park subject to the lien.
Second, Kemper applied to the City for final map approval of Tract Map No. 24135-3,
located within Paloma del Sol. The Council continued this matter off calendar pending
resolution of Paloma del Sol Park dispute. Kemper contends this action violates the
Subdivision Map Act.
Third, the Park is located in what was previously Planning Area 6 of the Paloma del Sol
Specific Plan. Originally, PA-6 comprised 37.8 acres of land end had target density of 5'90
units or 15 dwelling units per acre. In December 8, 1992 when the Park was added, PA-6
was reduced to 29.8 acres, and the Park was added as PA-37. The target density for PA-
AGENDA REPORT - Palores Del Sol Agreement
January 11, 1994
Page 2
6 was also reduced to 492 units, which resulted in e maximum density of 16.5 dwelling
units per acre.
In the course of researching the Assessment District lien issue, it was discovered that PA-
6 actually comprises of 37.9 acres. Given this fact, City Staff and Kemper representatives
have met and reached a resolution of these three disputes through the attached
Agreement. Briefly, the terms of the Agreement are as follows:
Kemper agrees to apply to Assessment District 159 to respread the
assessment and remove the lien from the Park.
Kemper agrees that all dedications to the City of park land and open space
are to be free and clear of all liens and encumbrances, except those
accepted by the City.
Kemper will apply for an amendment to the Paloma del Sol Specific Plan to
adjust the target density for PA-6 to reflect the newly found acreage. The
City will process the amendment at no cost. The Specific Plan Amendment
will adjust the maximum density for PA-6 to 590 units or 16.5 dwelling units
per acre, whichever is less. While City Staff will process a Specific Plan
amendment, there is no commitment that either the Planning Commission or
the City Council will approve the Amendment.
The City Council will approve Final Map No. 24135-3. Kemper shall waive
any claims it may have concerning the City's initial decision not to approve
the Final Map.
FISCAL IMPACT: The Agreement relieves the City of any responsibility to assume the
$633,000 Assessment District 159 lien in connection with acceptance of the Park. The
cost of processing the Specific Plan Amendment is estimated to be $4,496.50.
ATTACHMENTS:
Agreement between Kemper and the City regarding Paloma del Sol.
Paloma del Sol Specific Plan, Amendment Map No. 3, approved December 8,
1992.
Paloma del Sol Specific Plan, Amendment Map No. 2, approved March 26,
1992. .
A61~~ RI~ARDING PALOMA DXL SOL
This Agreement regarding Paloma de1 Sol is entered into
by and between the City of Tamsouls, m California municipal
corporation ("City") and XDRC, Inc., a Californ~s corporation
(NOwneT·) to be effec~ive on aanuary 11, 1994, with reference to
the following~
A. Owner is the developer of a mixed use subdivision,
commonly referred to and known as "Paloma.del Sol" approved by
the City's Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No. 3 CaBpacific
Plan') and incorporated into the ~mJndment and Restatement of
Develo ant Agreement between City and Owner recorded with the
Riverside County Recorder on February 18, 1993 as Document No.
62043 (eDevelolment Agreement").
B. The Specific Plan describes Planning Area 6 as
including 29.8 gross acres.
C. Located within the Specific Plan, Planning Area 37
is an 'S Acre Park" which is in fact a e9.5 Acre Park." The City
has refused to accept the 9.5 Acre Park because the parkland is
subject to an assessment lien imposed under Assessment District
159.
D. Owner has filed with =he City Council of City
('*City Council") for &pproval Final Vesting Tract Map No. 24135-3
("Final)(ape) which is part of the Paloma del 2ol subdivision.
On NoV.-m~-~ 23, 1994, the City Council at their regular meeting
continued off agenda consideration of the Final Map.
· . After conducting the final engineering
calculations for the Specific Plan, the Owner's civil engineering
consultant has certified that the correct and actual gross
acreage for Planning Acre 6 should be 36.3 acres. This will.
result in a difference cf an 6.5 acre increase in the acreage for
the 8pecif~c Plan, Planning Area 6.
F. tit and Owner wish to set forth in this Agreement
the terms and conditions under whichz (1) the Assessment District
159 assessment lien encumbering the 9.5 Acre Park shall be
removed and reapread; (2) the correct acreage and density shall
be shown on the Specific Plan, Planning Area 6S end (3) the Final
Map will be placed beck before the City Council for approval.
~ za'~tss
1. City agrees to accept the 8.5 Acre Park offered
for dedication by Owner.
Within ten (10) days of recording of the grant
deed for the 9.5 Acre Park, Owner shall appl to Assessment
District IS9 for removal of the ~ssessment D~strict lien from
Planning Area 37. Owner shall suppor~ and not object to the
removal of the axisSing assessment district lien on the Specific
Pla~, Planning &r~a 37 and the raspreading of &ssessment DistriCt
159 over other planning Areas within ~he 2paCific Plan as
determined by the Assessment District 159 Engineer pursuant to
California Streets & Highways Code SS 8733, 8740.1 and 8740.2 and
Government Code S 66493(2)(d). Following removal of the lien,
Owner shall provide City with title insurance providing that fee
title to the 9.5 Acre Park is vested with the City, free and
clear of all liens and encumbrances.
3. City shall place the Final Map on its January
1994, regular City Council meetin ageride for approval. Subject
to City Council approval of the F~nal Nap, Owner waives any legal
claims, including damages, it may have against the City in
i o
4. City shall process, at no cost or fees to be paid
by O~ner, an amendment to the Specific Plan to increase the
maximum number of dwelling units permissible in the Specific
Plan, Planning Area 6 to 590 dwellin units. The total density
shall not in any event exceed the existing target density of 16.5
dwelling units par acre for Planning/tree 6,
5. The City staff shall recommend to the Planning
Commission of city and to the City Council approval of an
amendment to the Specific Plan as sac forth in this Agesmeet.
6. City has determined that the amendment to the
Specific Plan as provided in this Agreement shall not require an
amendment to the Development Agreement. The actions required by
City and Owner pursuant to this Agreement shall be deemed "minor"
clarifications to the Existing Development Approvals set forth in
the Development Agreement.
7. Owner agrees that all dedications of parkland,
greenbelts, slopes, passsos, and open space shall be transferred
Co the City free and clear of all liens, taxes, assessments, and
easements of record except for any easements acceptable to City
in City's sole discretion. In connection with all such
dedications, Ovne~ shall provide City with title insurance.
s. City and Ovner u~derstand and agree Chat approval
of the amendment Co the Specific Plan ~s a discretionar~ decision
vhich can only be made following notice and public hearing. The
parties acknowledge that nothing contained In t~is Agreement
shall be construed as a procommitment on the part oZ the City
Planning Comaission or the City Council to approve any amendment
to the Specific Plan. Non-discretionar~ actions of the City and
the City a~ Ovne~.
CITY OF TN(ECUI~
ATTBST$
By:_
Ron RoberOs
Mayor
By:.
June S. Greek
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By=
~cott F. Field
City Attorney
NOWNER~
KDRC, INC., a California
corporation
By~
By:.
CITY OF TEMECULA
CASE NO.:
EXHIBIT: F
P.C. DATE:
Change of Zone No. 18, Specffic Plan No. 219, Amended No. 2
SPECIFIC PLAN REVISION MAP
January 27, 1992
CITY OF TEMECULA
ROADWAY LANDSCAPE TREATMENT
P
36
NEIGHBORHOOD
COMMERCIAL
2.5 AC.
POTENTIAL ACCESS POINT
CASE NO.:
EXHIBIT: C
P.C. DATE:
Change of Zone No. 18, Specific Plan No. 219, Amended No,
SPECIFIC PLAN AREA
January 27, 1992
ITEM NO.
23
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICEI~_
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
City Council/City Manager
/r~Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
January 11, 1994
SUBJECT: Final Vesting Tract Map No. 24135-3
PREPARED B~~Jim D. Faul, Assistant Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council approve Finel Vesting Tract Map No. 24135-3 subject to the Conditions
of Approval.
BACKGROUND:
Tract No. 24135 was originally submitted to Riverside County Planning Department on
Jahuary 3, 1989. The Tentative Vesting Tract Map was approved by the Board of
Supervisors on May 23, 1989.
Final Vesting Tract No. 24135-3 contains ninety-seven (97) residential lots and six (6) open
space lots within 25.83 gross acres. The tract is located on the southeast corner of Margarita
Road and Santiago Road.
This tract is part of the Meadows Specific Plan (SP 219) and Development Agreement No. 4.
The applicant is KRDC, Inc. The following fees have been paid for Final Vesting Tract Map
No. 24135-3:
Signal Mitigation Fee
Fire Mitigation Fee
Stephen's K-Rat Fee
$14,550.00
38,800.00
50,368.50
The following fees have been deferred for Final Vesting Tract Map No. 24135-3:
Public Facilities Fee
Flood Control Fee (ADP)
Due prior to Building Permit
N/A, per RCFCD letter dated
9-17-93
-1- pwOb"~egdrpt~94%0111%24135-3.egn 010494
The requirement of Quimby Fees (park fees) was to be satisfied pursuant to the Amended and
Restated Development Agreement between the City of Temecula and KRDC, Inc. (formerly
Bedford Development Company) end Mesa Homes, which became effective on January 31,
1992. Among other things, this Development Agreement provides for the granting of several
improved parks to the City.
The first park area to be granted to the City is located in the southeast portion of Paloma Del
Sol. The park improvements are completed and the City would be in a position to accept the
improvements, except for the fact that a dispute has arisen concerning the allocation of an
assessment lien under Assessment District 159 to the site. This dispute is set forth in detail
in the attached correspondence.
Staff is hopeful that this dispute can be resolved in the next month. Staff is not
recommending at this time that the recordation of this map be delayed as a result of this
dispute.
Final Vesting Tract No. 24135-3 was granted an extension of time by the "Amendment and
Restatement of Development Agreement - Paloma Del Sol" recorded February 18, 1993.
The following bonds have been posted for Final Vesting Tract Map No. 24135-3:
Faithful Labor & Subdivision
Performance Material Monument
Street and Drainage
Water
Sewer
Survey Monuments
$308,000 $154,000
$69,500 $34,750
$70,000 $35,000
635,500
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
ATTACHMENTS:
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Development Fee Checklist
Location Map
Copy of Map
Conditions of Approval
Fees and Securities Report
Letter of October 28, 1993, from Scott F. Field, City Attorney to Bryan Norren, KRDC
Letter to Bryan Noreen to David Dixon, City Manager, dated November 4, 1993
-2- p~rpt%94~011 l~24135-3.egn 010494
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEVELOPMENT FEE CHECKLIST
Final Vestina Tract MaD No. 94135-3
The following fees were reviewed by Staff relative to their applicability to this project.
F~
Habitat Conservation Plan
(K-Rat)
Parks and Recreation
(Quimby Fees)
Public Facility
(Traffic Mitigation)
Public Facility
(Traffic Signal Mitigation)
Public Facility
(Library)
Fire Protection
Flood Control
(ADP)
Condition of Aooroval
Condition No. 26.b
See Staff Report
N/A
See Road Department
Letter Dated 4/17/89, Item 22
N/A
See Fire Department
Letter Dated 2/24~89
Condition No. 14
N/A per RCFCD letter dated 9-17-93
-3- pwOStalldept~4%011 l~24135-3.mgn 010494
6 f:Of~tati~
'rY MAP
A[DT TO SCALE
I,I, .
DATE:
June 8, 1989.
RiVErsiDE COUrt;,u
PLAnnin DEPARaTIEn '
TO:
Surveyor
Road
Butldtng &.Safety
Flood Co trol
Health
Fire-Protection RE: TENTATIVE VESTING TRACT NAP NO, 24135 Amd.
$PEClF/C PLANS TEAN
The ltverstde County Board of Superfisors has taken the following actton on the above
referenced tentative vesttn9 map:
,, APPROVED tentative map subject to the attached conditions (no watver request
$mbelttBI).
DBIIED tentative mp based on the attached findings.
APPROYED tentative map subject to attached conditions and DENIED request for
waiver of the final map.
APPROY~ tentargive' map and APPROVED request for vatvet of the ftnal map.
APPROVED Extension of Ttme to
previously approved conditions. .
subject to 811
APPROYED Extension of Ttme to
previously approved conditions.
DEKI£D ExtensJon of Ttme ...........................................
subject to all
APPROVEDwtthdrawal of tentative mp.
,. APPROYED Mtnor Change to revtse originally "approved
(attached).
conditions as
shown
, DENlED nquest for MInor Change.
II~PROV~D Rlnor Cbl;geEt~Dvatve the ftnal map.
NL Very truly yours,
En' lVERSIDE COUIfiT PLANNING DEPARTMENT
E~./~j~loger $, $treeter, Planntng Dtrector
JT . .~,~-
~FI~~' RS ... Ron Goldman - Principal Planner
4080 LEMON STREET, 9TM FLOOR
RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92501
(714) 787-6181
46-~209 OASIS STREET, ROOM 304
INDIO, CALIFORNIA 92201
(619) 342-8277
,//
Hay 15. 1989
· i%·%
D.
q-
6.
D~
·
0
*'4E:S'ZZNG =IRAC= leO. 24131 Md. No. I - Va:STZa~ ~- NO 24132
3au::t. No. 2 - VE:STZNG ~ NO. 24133 Jeff. No I- *VE:STING
'31RACT NO. 24134 Md~ No. I - *VEb*'I'Z~ ~ACT NO. 24135 and. No.
I - *V~STZNG ~ NO. 24136Nad. No. 1-*VE:STING=I~CT NO.
24137 a~d. No. I - Bedford Properties - Supervisorial
District I - Pancho California Area - 698.1 Acres '2,519 lc~s
- Sche~ne A- SP Zoning
~/XZIVE AND FTvR the above men~icrmd _P~ee acted cfi by the Planning
Ga,,assicm cfi ~ril 12, 1989.
~E P~ CII44ISSICIq:
A~C~xw ~ae Negati,a Declaration for ~a,~x~ ~se~ ~s.
3~33, 3~70, 33383, 33469, 3~, 33413, ~. 3~14 ~ ~ ~
~~i~ ~t ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ a si~fi~t
RSS: CO: gs
AGENDA NO.
11A V~ NO'S 24131, 24132
24133, 24134, 24135, 24136
24137
April 19, 1989
Page 2
~ V~STZNG ~ ~ NO 24131/~d. No. 1, subject to the
attached cuadit/u~ ~ ~ m ~ f~~ ~
~~t~ ~ ~ P~ ~,~si~ ~ ~ ~ril ~,
19891 ~,
APENED %~'ZING =~23LTZVE =RACT NO. 24132/N~. No. 1, subject to
the a=tached ccr~it_ic~s and based cm the find/rigs and conclusions
incorporated in the Planning Ccmmiss~ minutes dated April 12,
1989; and,
AFFRCNED VESTIM3 =~EATIVE TRACT NO. 24133 J~d. No. 2, subject to
the attached conditions and based m the fiDa~.ngs and ccnclus=ons
incorporated in the Planning C~assicm minutes dated April 12,
1989; and,
APPR3U~) %~STING ~ E NO. 24134 J~d No. 1 subject to the
attached ccmditicrm and based cm the findings and conclusions
incorporated in the Plmming C~,.{ssicm minutes dated April 12,
1989; and,
APPENED VESTING =2NZRT/VE ~RACT NO. 24135 3i~ No. 1, subject to the
attached ccm~iitic~s a~ based cm the findings and ccmclus~ons
incozp~mted in the Planning ~sim minutes dated April 12,
1989; and,
APPEND) VESTING ~ =K~CT NO. 24136 3~d No. 1, ~ubject to
the attached conditions and based c~ the findings and c~nclus~ons
1989; and,
/
RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING CO~ISSION FLTNUTES
APRIL 12, 1989
(AGENDA ITEM 5-4 - Reel 1025, Std~ 1 and 2 - Tapes No. 3a, *3B, 4A)
VESTING TRACT HAP NO. 24131 - EA 33433 - Bedford Properties - Rancho California
Area -Ftrst Supervisortel Dtstrict - easterly of Hargartta Rd, southerly of
Pauha Rd , 441 lots - 105.4+ acres - SP Zone - Schedule A with VESTING TRACT
HAP NO. 24132 - EA 33470 - 223 lots - 90.2+ acres - SP Zone - Schedule A and
VESTING TRACT HAP NO. 24133 - EA 33383 - 693 lots - 163.7+ acres - SP. Zone -
Schedule A and VESTING TRACT RAP NO. 24134 - EA 33469 - 310 ]ors - 91.2+ acres
- SP Zone - Schedule A and VESTING TRACT HAP NO. 24135 - EA 33434 - 325 lots -
83.5+ acres - SP Zone - Schedule A and VESTING TRACT IMP NO. 24136 - EA 33413 -
400 lots - SF§.8~ acres - SP Zone Schedule A and VESTING TRACT FlAP O. 24137 -
EA 33414 - 147 lots - 64.3+ acres - SP Zone -
Schedule A
Heartngs ere opened at 3:30 p.m. and were closed at 4:19 p.m.
STAFF IECOI~!ENDATION: Adoptlon of the Negattve Declaration for EA Nos. 33433,
33470, 33383, 33469, 33434, 33413, and 33414 and approval of Testtng Tentative
Tract Nos. 24131 Amended No. 1, 24132 Amended No. 2, 24133 Amnded No. 1, 24134
Amended No. 1, 24135 Amended No. 1, 24136 Amended No. 1, and 24137 Amended No.
1 based on the ftndtngs and conclusions 11sted tn the staff report. Staff
advtsed that the vesttrig tracts are to Implement the western portton of The
Neadows Spectftc Plan (SP 119), whtch ts located east of Hargartta Road, west
of Butterfield Stage Road, north of Highway 79 and south of Pauba Road. The
proposal ts to subdivide approximately 698.1 acres tnto 2,529 residential lots
and 100 open space lots/school sttes. Zontng on stte ts SP. Surrounding
zontng ts SP, R-R, R-A, R-a-2~, R-A-5, A-1-10 and C-P-S. The site conslsts of
rolllng terratn except for the southern portton whtch ts flat, and ts vacant
wtth the exception of a portton of Vesttng Tract 24137, which has some
percolatton ponds. The stte had been used for dr,~ farmtrig where topography
permitted. The stte ts located near other adopted Spectftc Plans such as Vat1
Ranch (SP 223) and Redhawk (SP 217) to the south, as well as approved tracts to
the east.
The propose development conforms with the residential densities and destgn
standards of the speclftc plan. Vesttrig Tract 24131 wt11 dtvtde 105.4 acres
tnto 440 stngle faetly lots, with 13 open space lots, and was ended for a
rot nor redestgn of the tract to facilitate circulation. Vesttag Tract 24132,
. t 1
Mended No. 2 proposes to dtvtde 30.2 acres tnto 214 s ngle famtly lots with 1
open space lots Including an elementaPJ and Juntor htgh school stte. The tssue
of slope stability was a *concern of all the tracts and ms revtewed by the
County Geologist. Vesttrig Tract 24133 proposes to d~vtde 163.7 acres into 693
stngle famtly lots and 23 open space lots and has an extensive paseo system
~htch 11nks to an acttve recreation area. The Fire Department was concerned
about Internal-circulation and Norled tO avotd
c~tt ng through the paseo ar~a.
The cross secttbns of the greenbelt/paseo area Is on ftle. Vesting Tract 24134
proposes to dtvtde 91.2 acres tnto 311 stngle famtly lots and 19 open space
lots, whtch tncluded a 2.5 acre lot for a day care center. Vesttrig Tract Hap
24135 roposes to dtvtde 83.5 acres into 325 stngle famtly lots and 19 open
space ~ots. Vesttng Tract Hap 24136 proposes to dtvtde 99.8 acres Into 400
41
t,
RIVERSTDE COUNTY PLANNING COHN/SSZON HINUTES
APRIL 12, ' 1989
stngle famtly lots and 8 open space lots. There ts a htstortc stte on this map
and on Tract 24137 and a letter on thts stte was Incorporated ~lthtn the staff
report. All concerns have been resolved. Tract 24137 proposes to dirtale 64.3
acres tnto 146 stngle family lots, a 9,1 acre commercial lot and 7 open space
lots, A liquefaction study was prepared for thts tract and was revtewed by the
County Geologist to hts satisfaction.
Staff modified the condtttons of approval as follows:
CondtttonlB-e for Tracts 24133, 24134, 24135 and 24137: "Trash btns,
loadtng areas and Incidental storage areas located tn
recreation areas shall be located away and vtsually screened
from surrounding areas wtth the use of block walls and
landscaping."
Condition 18-f amended to read "bike access to recreation areas."
ConditiOn 21 to be replaced by standard language for the property owners
association matntatnlng the common areas rather than the strict
CSA requirements.
Condftton 26-a shall be deleted stnce none of the tract areas are in the
study area for the Stephens Kangaroo Rat or wtthtn the known
occupied habitat.
Condition 26-c should be modtfted to read: Prior to tssuance of bulldtng
rather than gradtng pemtts.
Condition 29 should be added to all the tracts, referring to the CEQA
monitoring of the mitigation measures.
Comtssloner Beadltng satd that there ts 100 acres etther for schcols or open
space. She asked tf they took the school sttes out, how much open space would
they have. Staff advised that there are 243 acres devoted to recreation and
open space outstde of the school sttes. Commissioner Beadltng asked whether
there was a provision for a clubhouse, and staff advised that there are plans
for recreation centers wtthln the plan. Staff wtll receive plot plans for the
open space areas. Lee Johnson, Road Department, advised that ttem No. 4 for
Tract 24133 should be amended to read 4_J/66 tnstead of 44/66.
TESTZNONY OF PROPONLqIT:
F!tke Ryan, Bedford Properties, 27405 Ynez Road, Pancho California, said that
they concur rlth the staff report end a11 conditions of approval except for
one. He said-that the condition appears tn all the tracts. They would 11ke
added to 1tern 16 of the Road Department letter dated Hatch 7, 1989 "or as
approved by the Road Commissioner." FIr. Johnson concurred ~lth that proposed
amendment.
42
RZVERS/DE COUNTY PLANNZNG COW4ZSSZON HZNUTES
APRIL 12, 1989
TESTIHONY OF OPPONENTS':
Fellx Probandt, P. O.Box 1150, Temecula, satd that all hls co,nents related to
the tssue of wastewater disposal, tn particular, the Eastern Huntct al Hater
Dtstrtct/Rancho California Eater Reclamation FactltV (hereafter called the
Eastern Sewer Plant). He had hls assistant present a sertes of transparencies
which Hr. Probandt used to Illustrate hts potnts. Hts residence ts located at
43789 Rendova Place. Hr. Probandt satd that the transparencies are generally
of documents.~hat the Commissioners have already received, and he 8nphastzed
the Information found tn those documents.
Hr. Probandt satd that the conditions of approval tnclude a condition that the
environmental assessment shall uttltze the evaluation of tmpacts addressed In
the E/R prepared *for Spectftc Plan No. 219. Under "~mpacts" the Information
was provided that the project wtll generate approximately 1.81 mt111on gallons
per day average peak dry weather sewage flow, and that the peak dry weather
sewage flow ts estimated to be 3.08 mt111on gallons per day to he treated by
the Eastern Sewage Plant. Another document states that the stte 11es ~thtn
the Jurisdictions of the Rancho California ~/ater Dtstrtct and the Eastern
Nuntctpal Hater DIstrict. He satd that Eastern, not Rancho, wtll provtde sewer
servtce. The San 53 letter has remarks whtch state that prtor to the first
LDC, the attached requested lnfomation ts to be Introduced to the E.H.S. The
Heaqth letter dated August 9, 1988 to the Rancho California Hater Dtstrtct
discussed the "wtll service" letter. He noted that atyptcal response to a
Health Department letter was "yes" to the questton of whether there was
adequate capacity. Eastern Nuntctpal Hater Distrtct's response to a "wtll
serve" letter has a statement that "servtce mtght be precluded by the San Dtego
Ragton I~ater Quality Control Board." A second copy of a San 53 has the
statement that sewer ma~ require off stte sewer facilities subject to the
treatment plant capactty of the San Diego Raglone1 Hater Quallty Control Board.
The San Dtego Hater Board's Order No. 88-94 had to do wtth discharge
specifications and certaln difficulties Eastern was experiencing In discharging
whtch was tn violation of the "basln plan" as well as capacity. Order No.
88-101 was tssued for a ttme schedule for the Eastern Nuntctpal Hater Dtstrtct
to recttfy the problems, He satd because of the agreement wtth Camp Pendleton
and the Rancho DIstrict, Eastern ts belng allowed three years to work out the
violations, but they can only go to three m1111on a day, and tn order to be
'able to discharge three mt111on gallons, they rest comply vtth certatn report
dates for the next three ~elrs. The report concludes that Eastern shall submit
to the Regtonal Board on or before each compliance date a Report of Compliance
or Noncompliance wtth each task. The last page was a table whtch Indicated
that the tracts average peak sewage flow comes to 0.788 mt111on gallons a day
(NGD). He potnted out that water ts Introduced to thts flow to dtlute tt. The
monthly report..shows an average of 2,260 mtllton gallons by the end of
February, rlth I maxtame of 2,423 I(GD. He said that under the present
operating status of the Eastern Idatar DIstrict, there Is no reasonable
assurance that Eastern ~11 be able to treat and discharge the wastewater flows
comtng out of the sub;lect tracts for whtch environmental assessments are ~n
question.
43
R:ZVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNTNG CO~TSSZON FIiNUTES
APRTL 12~ 1989
Hr, Prohandt satd' that EIR 235 for $P 219 was defective because ~nfonnation
that could not have been known at the time of the EIR was certified as
complete, The San Dtego Regtona~ Board'Orders and the action by the Rancho
California Board and the Pietines a]] took piece subsequent to the October 1988
Board of Superrlsors approval of the subject EIR, No negatJve declaration can
be issued because there exists substantial evtdence that each project.or tract
tn questton my have a significant effect on the environment, The revtew
process presented was tn violation of due process and that the pertinent agenc,v
(the Department of Hea~th) dtd not follow Its own ru~es tn the approval
process.
Comtsstoner Beadltng satd that what was basically betng satd ts that the plant
ts at capactty now and thts project cannot be Included. Nr. Probendt said that
Eastern ts tn violation of the bastn plan. The inter code of the State of
California has a 11st of rules 'whtch allows any member of the publlc to protest
an order of the Board. One of the procedures was to protest to the State 14ater
Resources Board. He satd that by the ttme thts project ts butlt, he didn't
belteve that he can be assured that the project wtll not be tn violation of the
3 NGD. Con~tsstoner Beadltng asked whose responsibility thts Is.
Nr. Vtckers satd that Eastern Indicated that they had the capactty and would
serve these tracts. Commissioner Beadlerig noted that from what Nr. Probandt ts
saytrig. Eastern cannot provtde the capacity. Nr. Vtckers satd that that
statement could be b
su .tect to a dtspute by Eastern. They cannot stt tn
Judgment of whether or not Eastern ts or ts not tn violation. That Issue would
have to be heard tn San Dtego before the I~ater quallty Control Board down
there. Idhat the developer has ts a letter from Eastern Nuntctpal saytng that
there ts capacity. Fir. Vtckers advtsed that they should not be substituting
thetr Judgment for either Eastern or the Hater Quallty Control Board over
whether or not there ts capacity.
Coff~tsstoner Purrlance 'satd that he dtd not belteve that thts was tn the
purview of the Conznlsston. to check whether there are proper assurances from
the proper agencies. However, tf the San D~ego RklQCB say that Eastern ts
persisting tn violating the be$tn plan, tt would seem as tf the MICB has the
power to tssue a cease and destst order whtch would prohlbtt them from allowtng
more hookups or whatever other actlon they choose to take.
Conznlssloner Bresson satd that there ts a Nello Roos tn that area, but he dtd
not know ff part of that dtstrtct ms for the development of a sewage plant.
He felt that Eastern has a obligation when they w~ote thetr letter saytrig that
they have capecity, and the Comntsston has to constrict that Eastern w111 do It.
Zf Eastern gets additional capact . there ts no problem; tf not, then Eastern
and the developer wtll have a probream. The Commission has to go by what
docmentatfon ts Fiven them.
Nr. Probendt satd that he was alleglng that the developer cannot get capactty
because of Eastern~s own statements. He satd that what he was trytrig to show
RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING COHHISSION MINUTES ·
APRIL 12, 1989
wtth the transparencies of the documents ~s that the statement from the Hea]th
Departaent has · "yes* check for capacity, but that does not mean anything.
lihat does mean mthtn9 ts the letter Eastern sent dated 12-19-BB which states
that 'service might be precluded by IIQCB-SD.* Iqr. Prolandt said that if this
project develops further, Eastern ~111 testtf that this ts not a btndtng
comttment, and ts not a contract to serve. ~he potnt he ts saytrig ts that the
developer cannot get a negattve declaration 4f there exists substantial
evtdence that the project, tn thts case the tracts, wtll have a significant
envtronment~] trapact. Therefore, he ms presenting the tnfomatton tn that
con text.
fir. Vtckers asked tf sewage was a part of Spactftc Plan 219 and E/R 235 and
were mitigation measures a part of that. Staff advtsed that tt was.
Vickers painted out that added to the conditions today were conditions
regarding environmental monitoring and recording. Co~tsstoner Beadling said
that she was concerned that the developer wtl] grade the land, then find that
he cannot build. ithat they will end up wtth is land that has been disturbed
and ts subject to eroston.
Nr. Probandt satd that he moved onto his property after the Board approved the
specific plan. He would have been at these hearings before this, had he moved
tnto the area earller. He ts tr3ring to establish evtdence that these tracts
my have a significant impact on the environment.in order to get thts problem
resolved. Nr. Vlckers satd that the environmental ftndtngs tn the EZR address
the issue of sewage and the mitigation of that problem. Ne noted that a
condition was added today for monitoring and reporting, and advised that the
development could be stopped at various stages tf tt is not at the right level.
Con~ntsstoner Purrlance said that he dtd not belteve tt was the Commtsston's
role to make the determination that Hr. Probandt wants. lihether or not the
developer ts followtrig the requirements of the Ragtonal liater Quality Control
is between the developer and that agency. Nr. Probandt re!terated that this is
an environmental assessment that ts betng considered and the Commission cannot
tssue a negative declaration under these circumstances based on substantial
evtdence that thts project may affect the environment. Coantsstoner Purrlance
advtsed that County Counsel ts saytng that the plan calls for these thtngs to
be mitigated and that the conditions have been amended so the project ts
*monitored. Therefore, the negattve.doclaratton ts perfectly legal,
The hearing ms closed at 4:19 p,m.
FZNDZNGS AND CONCLUSIONS: Seven Tentative Vesttrig Tract Nos. 24131, 24132,
24133, 24134, 24135, 24136 end 24137 have been sulmttted; the subject tracts
enttrely vith~n adopted S dftc Plan llo. 219; the seven vesttng
ere located been destgned to the devell:eopment
tracts have
standards of Adopted $pactftc Plan
No. 219; Env!ronmental Assessment Nos. 33433, 33470, 33469, 33434, 33413, and
33414, based on the findings of Environmental lapact Report No. 235, prepared
for Specific Plan No. 219, tndtcate that the envtromental trapacts can be
avoided or mitigated to an acceptable level, except for cumulathe Air Quality
~mpacts, ~htch cannot be fully mitigated; a statement of Overriding Ftndtngs
45
R/YERSIDE COUNTY PLANNZNG COI~ISSXON HZNUTES
APRZL 12, 1989
for cm~ulattve Air Quallty trapacts ms approved by the Board of Supervisors on
October 4, 1988; and, Development Agreement No, 4 has been recorded for
Speclflc Plan No, Zig, The proposed tracts conform to Spectftc Plan No. 219;
conform to-the requirements of Ordinance Nos, 348 and 460; based on the
environmental determination made tn Environmental Assessment Nos. 33433, 33470,
33383, 33469, 33434, 33413, and 33414, the subject vesttng tracts wtll not have
a significant effect on the environment, wtth the exception of cumulative Air
Qualtty trapacts whtch cannot be fully mitigated; and, the akovo r-'erenced
Envtronmentaq Assessments tnclude the Statement. of Overriding Ftndtngs for
cumulative Al'r Quallty 1rapacts approved by the Boar of Supervisors on October
4, 1988, therefore, the environmental trapacts have been mitigated to an
acceptable level through pro~lect destgn and the conditions of approval.
NOTION: Upon motion by Commissioner Bresson, seconded by Commissioner Beadling
and unanimously carried, the Con~ission adopted the Negative Declarations for
EA Nos. 33433, 33470, 33383, 33469, 33434, 33413 and 33414 and approved
Tentative Tracts No. 24131/mended No. 1, 24132 Amended No. 2, 24133 Amended
No. 1, 24133 Amended No. 1, 24134/mended No. 1, 24135 Amended No. 1, 24136
Amended No, 1, and 24137 Amended No. 1 subject to the amended conditions of
approval and based on the above findings and conclusions.
In answer to Commissioner Bresson, Nr, Vtckers advised that on the previous
item, the Development Agreement was in place. These are new vesting maps
within the Specific Plan.
46
Zcming Area: Pancho California
Supervisorial District: First
E.A. Number: 33433, 334'70, 33383,
33469, 33434, 33413,
33414
Spec/fic Plan Sectice
vesting Trac'c Nos.: 241313m~_n~ment No. 1
24132 J~en~ment No. 2
24133 ~mendment No. 1
24134 ~ No. 1
24135 .Amendment No. 1.
24136/~m~t No. 1
24137/~en~me~t No. 1
P~ CuauissiGn: 4-12-89
~rJenda Ita~ No.: 5-4
C)
C~
Applicant:
Type of 1Rec/ue.~:
4. location:
Jober~ Bein, W~ 11 ~ ~n Frost & Associates
5. E~as~ing Z~ne:
To subdivide 698.1 acres into seven
~sting r ~v~5,~ (24131, 24132, 24133,
24c~~4132 24136, and 24137)
2,529 resident/al lo~s
and 100 open space lots/school sites.
The r~aCcs are located within ~he
Meadows Specific P~n 0~o. 219). The
site is in the S~ate Highway 79
of Sou=hwes~ern Riverside County.
Specifically, the subject tracts are
located eas~ of Margari=a Rd. and ~
of Butter~ield Stage Rd., 4q~ea{ately
north of Highway 79, and south of Pauba
SU.,.,,.,:,,d~4 ng Zc~.ng:
SP, R-P~ R-~ R-A-21/2, R-A-5, A-1-10,
C-P-S
7. Site Charac~cs:
=he sate of the subjec~ tracts ~msis~s
of ro~ ~ 4ng te~,ain ~ f~ ~
~ ~m ~ ~ sate, ~ ~
~t. '~ si~ ~ ~ ~ f~ ~
~~. ~ ~ ~~ of
~~ ~ ~ a ~~ of
V~ ~ 24~7, ~ of ~ si~e ~
Vesr./ng Tract: Nos. 24131 A,~Ua~:~'~ NO. 1
24132 j~mdedNo. 2 ·
24133 Ja~nd,k,9 No. 1
24134~No. 1
24135/m~xk~No. 1
24136 ~mended 1io. 1
24137 ;~egJed No. I
PacJe 2
8. Area Characterista. cs:
e
10. T~nd DiviSiC~ Data:
S~cific P~-.s, such as Vail Ranch
(Specific Plan 223) and Paeawk
(Specific Plan 217) to the Sou~h as
w_ll as ~ tracts to the east.
LAND USE: ~edSpecific Plan No. 219
~Ct~~ING SIN~. FAM~.¥
~ PLANNIN3 AREAS IDTS
24131Amd. No. I 105.4
24132Amd. No. 2 90.2
24133Amd. No. i 163.7
241342~xi. No. I 91.2
1 83.5
24136Amd. No. i 99.8
24137~. ~. I ~.3
15, 22 440
30, 31, 32 214
16, 19, 20, 21 693
18, 33, 34 311
8 400
1, 2-a 146
TO=ALS 698.1
Flood CaYcrol:
3-07-89
3-20-89
3-27-89
2-27-89
1-18-89
4-14-89
Oa~S2~CIAL LOTS/SCHOOL
1DTS SITES
0 13
0 11
0 23
0 19
0 ~D
0 8
i 7
2,529 I 100
See letters ~ated:
Tra~c NO. 24132 A,,e'aa,r~zat No. 2
*Road DeFe~,L: 3-06-89
Bealth ~: 3-20-89
Flood Ccffcrol: 3-24-89
Fire DeFerSnine: 3-21-89
Building and Safety: 3-06-89
l~vised ~ Degc: 4-17-89
Vestin~ Tract Nos. 24131 Irataxied 14o. 1
24132~,-.,_y~No. 2
24133 ]mm'g:led 14o. 1
24134 :.dr_~%er.l 14o. 1
24135 ]mm'dmd 1~.. 1
24136 ]m,err. b'-t 14o. 1
24137 ,pme,rr'--4 14o. I
Page 3
Tract No. 24133 auendaent No. I
3-06-89
2-27-89
3-27-89
2-24-89
3-06-89
4-17-89
Tract No. 24135/~nendment No. I
M~lth DeparUuent:
Flood Cor~rol:
Fire Dep~ U~nt:
Building and Safety:
Revised 1:toad Dept..:
3-06-89
2-27-89
3-27-89
2-24-89
3-06-89
4-12-89
Tract No. 24134/~endaent No. I
Flood Ooatrol:
Building and Safety:
3-06-89
3-20-89
3-27-89
2-24-89
3-06-89
4-17-89
Tract No. 24136 A~endment No. I
Health Del:z~'p-nt:
Flood Cantrol:
F~ ~ U.~t:
~~g ~d ~y:
3-06-89
2-27-89
3-27-89
2-24-89
3-06-89
4-12-89
Tract No. 24137 ]m~rKt~ent No. I
M~th DeparUmnt:
Flood Control:
Building and Safety:
County Geologist:
ReviaedRoadZept.:
3-07-89
2-27-89
3-27-89
2-24-89
3-06-89
1-30-89
4-12-89
Seven Vesting Te~a~ve Tra~cs have been filed within adored ,~pec4~ic Plan
No. 219 fibs Meadows). Vesting Tentative Tract No. 24131 ~c~x~es to divide
453 ~ m 105.4 acres. Vesting Tentative Tract No. 24132 will divide 214
~ m 90.2 a~so
In the iZarior of ~he Specific Plan, Vesting Tract No. 24133 mis~ of 716
of =be ~pec__4 ~4c Plan area, will divide 91.2 acres ~ 330 l~cs.
Plan, incluc~s ~4' 3~f
99.8 acres ~ 408 lo~. Finally, Vet/rig Tract 14o. 24137, in ~he
pTa.a of c ec44'ic adjace HiCk, my 79, to
St_~f Report
Vesting Tract Nos. 24131 ]Ben~ed No. 1
24132/~ended No. 2
24133/tinended No. 1
24134/~enc~dNo. 1
24135 a~.--..b~J No. 1
24136/~.--~ No. 1
24137 ~ No. I
Page 4
Specific P/aa No. 219, adopted by the Board of Su~rvi~)rs c~ October 4, 1988,
includes 5,611 dw~_~14~g units ~11389 acres. The seven tracts implement the
western portia~ of the Specific Paan.
EnTiromBntal Impact Report No. 235 assessed the full range of enviramental
concerns associated with the Specific Plan. All identified potentis/impacts,
except for cumulative effects cm air ~mlity, were reduced to an acceptable
level throug~ mitigeticm ~-~=es inoorporBted into the project, oanditions of
approval and project ~esign. =he envixam~ntal impact report is the basis for
the envi~c~s.~atal assasm~ents for the subject =ra~cs.
Assesm~ent Nos. 33433, 33470, 33383, 33469, 33434, 33413, and 33414 indicated
that all potential/rapacts for the tracts can be mitigated to an a_cvJeFJ_=ble
level.
Project Consistency with/irkSted Specific Plan
The subject tracts were thoroughly reviewed for ccmsistency with Adopted
Specific Plan No. 219. =he residential densities and layout ccmfomn to t/le
T~nd Use Plan. lott/n~, as shown cm tba tract maps, will acous.odate the
zoning provisicas of the zoning ordinance adopted in cc~junctia~ with the
Specific plnn. =he vesting t_-Bct m~os and o~e~axm~L~ng conditions of
in Section III.B of t~e srec-4~c Plan.
Issues dealt with at the ~esign stage of the tracts ha~e included internal
cir~,lnticm within the tracts, mitigaticm of h'~-e..or'ic: resouroes, and geologic
issues. FirBl~y, interzm/,._4'r,?,l:n4-{c~n kaS a omxmrn in all of the t. rac~s
under co~sictsrat/cm, ex~mp~ for Vest/rig Tract No. 24137. ~ese c~xmrns were
the County Parks De~e~U~st. _It. was datemined that the historic zesour~es
geologic cn~c~--m ~.luded liquefactic~ for Vestin~ Tract 24137 and slope
stability for a~ ~ of the tracts. l%eports were prepared c~ each issue and
liquefacticm '~sue for Tract 24137 are presented in a-letter dated 1-30-89.
of the ~ were ~e and s~,l~ be inco,~o,,ted into the dayelephant
and constructam of the tracts.
StaffPaport
Vest/rag Tract Nos. 24131 2t~,rae.i 14o. 1
24132 aqmended No. 2
24133 ~ 14o. 1
24134 Jqas~v4ma No. 1
24135 auert. ded 14o. 1
24136 ~ No. 1
24137 -%.~'_-<3 No. i
Page 5
1. Seven Tentative Vesting Tract Nos. 24131, 24132, 24133, 24134, 24135,
24136,'lnd 24137 have been su~nitted.
2. =he subject tracts are located entizely within adopted Specific Plan No.
219.
3. Tne sevenvestingtractskmve~eendesigned to the develcFa~nt standards
of j~cgcedSpecific P~a~No. 219.
Envic~muental Assessmer~ Nos. 33433, 33470, 33383, 33469, 33434, 33413,
and 33414, based cm the findings of Envicca~aer~al 1rapact .Report No. 235,
prepared for Specific P/an 14o. 219, indicate that the ernrlrc~veltal
inloacts _P~q be a~Dided or mitigated to an accegcable level, except for
camlat/ve Air Quality hupacts, which cannot be fully mitigated. A
statement of Overriding Findings for ct~=tive Air Quality in~acts was
a~roved by the Board of Supervisors cm 0ctcber 4, 1988.
5.' Develc~a~ent/~greem~cNo. 4 ~m~been recordeaforSpecific Plan No. 219.
1. The proposed tracts conform to S~cific Plan No. 219.
The proposed vesting tracts outCorm to the requj_-wenta of Ordinance
348 and 460·
Nos. 33433, 33470, 33383, 33469, 33434, 33413, and 33414, the subject
vesting tracts w~3~ not have a significant effect m the envitame~t, with
the exceF~_cn of c,-,-,~tive Air Quality ~"T,,~e 'amich'cannot be fully
Sta~ of ~ F~a~cjs for ctxm,~tive Air Quality impacts
k/A-x~4 of a Negative De~-3=,',at:l.f:m for Erxv'~-x,---A='t Assesanent Nos. 33433,
33470, 33383,. 33469, 33434, 33413, a~d 33414 besed cm the finding that the
project design and the omdi~ of ~; and,
aPPKNAL of Vesting Tentative Tragc No. 24131 ~uz_faed No. 1, subject to the
attached cax~itiu of aL-,a.~c,v'al; 'and,
Staff Report
Vesting Tract Nos. 24131/%~nded No. 1
24132/~ended No. 2
24133 ammded No. 1
24134/~mended No. 1
24135 ]emnded No. 1
24136 A~xK~ed No. 1
24137/%m~aa No. i
Page 6
~ o£ Ve, st~ Tentative Tract 14o. 24132 J~nended No. 2, subject to the
attached .col.'ticks o~ ai4~ov-3; and,
of vesting Tentative Tract
caxiitions of aRamval~ and,
No. 24133/~n~ea No. 1, subject to the
of Vesting Tentative Tract No. 24134/~ended No. 1, subject to the
~ditions of spprovB1; and,
APPIqOVAL of Vesting Tentative Tract No. 24135/~mended No. 1, subject to the
attached conditions of ~; and,
~ of Vesting Tentative Tract No. 24136 Amended No. 1, subject to the
attached ccmditials of ~; and,
~ of Vesting Tentative Tract No. 24137 Amended No. 1, subject to the
attached conditicrm of ai3proTdl.
o0:cj
· ~VAC
I LAND USE
, VAC
IEI
'1
~ ;CAT-T!
m.A..'r-T-ERF, D
· VAC
· . \
":i ' "~' \'~ \
' 'P"/~ °'~° MAP (
"'; I}AI}p. BEDFORD PROPERTIE"""'~ "~
Use 2529 LOTS
· Arel RANCHO CALIF lit S,p. Dlst ~ ..~.. r
~ ~ 2 o o o' I/wvE'~/Z:~ ClXav77
RZVERSZDE COUNTY PLANNZNG DEPARTMENT
SUBDZVZSZON
CONDZTTONS OF APPROVAL
VESTZNG TENTATZVE TRACT NO. 24135
AMENDED NO'. I
STANDARD CONDZTZONS
The su~dtvtder shall defend. tnde,mtfy. and hold hamless the County of
RIverside. tts agents, officers, and employees from'any clatm. actton. or
proceeding agatnst the County of Riverside or tts agents. officers. or
employees to attack, set astde, votd, or annul an approval of the County
agencte Pal boards or legislative body
of RIverside, its advtsory ~~3~ended No. I which action
concerning Vesting Tentative Tract
is brought about within the time 'period provided for tn California
Government Code Sectton 66499.37. The County of Riverside will promptly
nottry the subdivider of any such clatm, action, or proceeding agatnst the
County of RIverside and will cooperate fully in the defense. Zf the
County fatls to promptly nottry the subdivider of any such clatm, action,
or proceeding or fatls to cooperate fully tn the defense, the subdivider
shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, Indemnify, or hold
hamless the County of Riverside.
The tentative subdivision shall comply with the State of California
Subdivision Map Act and to all the requirements of Ordinance 460, Schedule
A, unless modified by the conditions listed below.
This conditionally approved tentative map will expire two years after the
County of Riverside Board of Supervisors approval date, unless extended as
provided by Ordinance 460.
The final map shall be prepared by a licensed land surveyor subject to all
the requirements of the State of California Subdivision Map Act and
Ordinance 460.
The subdivider shall submit one copy of a soils report to the RIverside
County Surveyor's Office and two copies to the Department of Butlding and
Safety. The report shall address the sotls stability and geological
conditions of the site. ·
If any grading is proposed, the subdivider shall submit one print of a
comprehensive grading plan to the Department of Butldtng and Safety. The
plan shall coeply with the Untform Butldtng Code, Chapter 70, as amended
by Ordinance 457 and as may be additionally provided for tn these
conditions of approval.
TENTATZVE TitACT N0. 24135, Mo. ,.
Conditions of Approval
Page 2
7. A gradin pemtt shall be obtatned from the Department of Butlain9 and
Safety pr~
outstale of maintai ned
or to commencement of any grading
COUnty
road fight of way,
8. Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid prior to recoraaUon of the
fi no1 map.
9. The subdivider shall comply wtth the street improvement recommendations
outltnkd in the Riverside County Road Oepartment's letter dated i-S-ag~
4-12-89 a copy of which ts attached. (Amended - Planntn~ Commission -
April 12, 1989)
Legal access as required by Ordinance 460 shall be provlaed from the tract
map boundary to a County maintained road.
11. All road easements shall be offered for dedication to.the public and shall
conttnue tn force until the governing body accepts or abandons such
offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved
by the Road Commissioner. Street names shall be subject to approval of
the Road Commissioner.
12. Easements, when requ i red for roadway bl opes, drai name faci 11 ties,
utilities, etc., shall be shown on the final map if they are located
wi thin the 1 and di vi si on boundary. A11 offers of dedi cati on and
conveyances shall be submitted and recorded as directed by the County
Surveyor.
13. Water and sewera9e disposal facilities shall be installed in accordance
with the provisions set forth in the Riverside County health Department's
letter dated 2-27-89 a copy of which is attached.
14. The subdivider shall comply with the flood control . recommendations
outlined by the Riverside County Flood Control District's letter dated
3-27-89 a copy of which t s attached. If the 1 and di vi si on l i es wi thin an
adopted flood control drainage area pursuant to Section 10.25 of Ordinance
460, appropriate fees for the construction of area drainage facilities
shall be collected by the Road Coaaisstoner.
15. The subdivider shall comply ~th the fire improvement recommendations
outlined in the County Fire Marshal's letter dated 2-24-89, a copy of
which is attached.
16. Subdivision phasing, including any proposed common open space area
improvement phasing, if applicable, shall be subject to Planning
Department approval. Any proposed phasing shall provt de for aaecluate
vehicular access to all lots in each phase, and shall substantially
confom to the intent and purpose of the subdivision approval.
TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 24135,/end.
Conditions of Approval
Page 3
17. The subdivider and all successors in interest shall comply with
provisions of Development Agreement No. 4 and Specific Plan No. 219.
18. Lots Created by this subdivision shall comply with the following:
a) All lots shall have a minimum size of 5,000 square feet.
19.
0e
the
b)
Corner lots and through lots, if any, shall be provided with
additional area pursuant to Section 3.BB of Ordinance 460 and so as
not to contain less net area than the least amount of net area in
non-corner and non-through lots.
c) Lots created by this subdivision shall be in conformance with the
development standards of the Specific Plan zone·
d)
Graded but undeveloped land shall be maintained
condition and shall be either planted with interim
provided with other erosion control measures as
Director of Building and Safety.
in a weed-free
landscaping or
approved by the
e)
Trash bins, loading areas and incidental storage areas, located in
recreation areas shall be located away and visually screened from
surrounding areas with the use of block walls and landscaping.
{Amended - Planning Commission - April 12, 1989)
f)
Bike racks and bike lockers in sufficient quantity shall be provided
in convenient locations to facilitate bike access to the pwe~eet aFea
recreation areas. (Amended - Planning Commission - April 12, 1989)
Prior to RECORDATION of the final map the following conditions shall be
satisfied:
Prior to the recorder,on of the final map the. applicant shall submit
written clearances to the Riverside County Road and Survey Department
that all pertinent requirements outlined in the attached approval
letters from the following agencies have been met:
County Fire Department
County Flood Control
County Health Department
County Parks Department
A property owners' association with the unqualified right to assess the
owners of the individual units for reasonable maintenance costs shall be'
established and continuously maintained. The association shall have the
right to lien the property of the owners who default in the payment of
their assessments. Such lien shall not be subordinate to any encumbrance
other than a first deed of trust provided such deed of trust is made in
good faith and for value and is of record prior to the lien of the
association.
TEHTATZVE TI~CT NO. 24135, AEd. tl
Conditions of Approval
Page 4
GeeMty fee m4mph t+t~e. to a~ asssos o~ assmen open spa. aweas. fpee
end .e~eaw ef al~ qtenS. 4~iKes. assessment. ~eases ~eee~ded and
wnweeoPded, and easements. eNeep~ those ea.emen. ~h4ek 4n the sole
Geent~ aceopting ttt~e to seek aweas. the aebdiv4dew ska;~ swimit the
ska~ be seb~eet te the appweva~ o~that depawtment and the Qfftee o~ the
Gewnky GeeRoe;+
sample deeMmen, eenveytq title te the pwwehaseP of an ind~vtdwal
emit whisk p~evtdes that the desks,antes e.f so,eRas,s,
The dee~awatieM ef e~eRaRts. sendinteRs and weSt~tettOnS ewbmttted ~oF
~evte. sha~/ca, pPevtde fop a tess of 6Q ~eawe, ,b½ pMovtde ~e~ the
establishment of a p~epewty ew~ewe~ easeeta,ion eemp~tsed of 4he ewnews e~
eaeh 4nd4vtdual ~e{ eP un+~ and ~e½ eenta4n the fel~ewtRg pPev+siens
ANetvd,4..thstandtRg any pPevis~en tn 4hii DesksPa,ten 4e the eeRtwaPy~
the ~el~ew~ng pPevtsteR shall aPPlY+
p~epe~ty ewRePs~ assestatteR established he~elR
GeuRty O4F Rivewelds, and the pepsPly ewReweA
unconditionally seeapt ~Pem the GeMany o~ R4veps4de, WpeR the Gewnty&s
papt46w~aPly deseptbed as ~ets A thPewgh
the sob dieswetteR e~ the GeMely e{
.the event 4hat the eemmen awes, ep any paPS tke~ef, 4s eaR,eyed te
evm seek ZOORISeR -awea&~ shall senage and seRttneees~yJsitntatR seek
Aemn aweaZ, 0~ any pap, theweary absent the pp4m, ww~ttew eaRsent
4he PlaRRlq D4-Peste~ ef4he GeWRty e4rR+veweide e4,4he ~OeRIyAS
sacassess-in-tale,sol, The peepspry OWRepSA seasedition shall hive
weasonabh east of ms4n~s4nhg seek noesten aweaz, end sha~ have the
p&ght te l&en the pweper&y .f any sash OURe~ ~ho defaults 4R the
settee sf assessment ew ethe~ deemsst ewes,in! the assessseat ~ten.
/
TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 24135,/bad. #1
CondtUons of Approval '
Page 5
],.
;his DesksTulles ska~l set be leFmtsstedw Asubstesttal~yz amended e~
pwepew~y deanseNed tkewe~wem absent ike pwte~ wwttleR sensent s~ the
P~SSStS9 eimmskew of ~ke Geun~y e~ Riverside ei, ~ke Goum~y~s
sueeessew-in-tske~eskv A F~eFesed mmesdment ska~ be sensidewed
ASUbSlSstta~ 4~ 4t s~ests ~ke esiest~ usage ewsa~ntesanse ef ~he
AssseeR ewesA,
eke event e~ lay eesf~tet between (his Des~aFat~eR asd ~ke Ar~teles e~
.tsee~pewsitenv the By~awsv ew the pwepepty sweepsA easeRiskieR Ru~es and
Regu~atteRs~ 4~ amy3 4Its Dee~a~atieR sha~4 eent~e~,n
Ones apFwevedT lie deedswaiVes e~ sevensmisT eesd~t~ess and wes~wie~ioss
ska~ be ~eeewded at tke same ~&me ~kst ~ke fisa~ map is Peee~dedv
(Deleted -Planntng Commission - April 12, 1989)
Prior to recordatton of the final subdivision map, the subdivider shall
submit the following documents to the Planning Department for review,
which documents shall be subject to the approval of that department and
the Office of the County Counsel:
1) A declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions; and
2)
A sample document conveying title to the-purchaser of an individual lot
or unit which provides that the declaration of covenants, conditions
and restrictions is incorporated therein by reference.
The declaration of covenants,, conditions and restrictions submitted for
review shall (a) provide for a minimum term of 60 years, (b) provide for
the establishment of a property owners' association comprised of the owners
of each individual lot or unit, (c) provide for ownership of the common
area by either the property owners' association or the owners of each
individual lot or unit as tenants in common and (d) contain the following
provisions verbatim:
"Notwithstanding any provision in this Declaration to the contrary,
the following provision shall apply:
continuously mantatn particul a rly descrl bed as
lots A through V on Vesting I r)ct Nap No. 24135 Amended No. 1 attached
her, to, and shall not sell or transfer the 'cormnon area', or any part
thereof, absent the prior written consent of the Planning Director of
the County of Riverside or the County's successor-in-interest.
The property owners' association shall have the right to assess the
owners of each individual lot or unit for the reasonable cost of
maintaining the 'common area' and shall have the right to lien the
TBTATIVETRACTRO. 24135, Amd. el
Condtttomms of Approval
Page 6
2e
property of any such owner who defaul'ts in the payment of a
maintenance assessment. An assessment lien, once created, shall be
prtor to all other liens recorded subsequent to the notice of
assessment or other document creattng the assessment lien.
Thts Declaration shall not be temtnated, 'substantially' amended or
property deannexed therefrom absent the prior written consent of the
Plarmtng Director of the County of Rherstde or the County's
successor-in-interest. A proposed amendment shall be considered
'substantial' tf it affects the extent, usage or maintenance of the
*common area*.
In the event of any conflict between this Declaration and the Articles
of Incorporation, the Bylaws or the property owners' association Rules
and regulations, if any, this Declaration shall control."
Once approved, the declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions
shall be recorded at the same time that the final rap Is recorded. (Added
- Planning Commission - April 12, 1989)
The developer shall comply with the following parkway landscaping
conditions:
1)
Prior to recordatton of the final map the developer shall file an
application with the County for the fomation of or annexation to, a
parkway maintenance district for Vesting Tentative Tract No. 24135
Amended No. I in accordance with the Landscaping and Lighting Act of
1972, unless the project is within an existing parkway maintenance
district.
2)
Prior to the issuance of building pemtts, the developer shall secure
approval of proposed landscaping and irrigation plans from the County
Road and Planning Department. All landscaping and irrigation plans
and specifications shall be prepared in a reproducible format suitable
for pemanent filing with the County Road Department.
3)
The developer shall post a landscape performance bond which shall be
released concurrently with the release of subdivision performance '
bonds, guaranteetng the vtabtltty. of all landscaping which will be
Installed prior to the assumption of the maintenance responsibility by
the district.
4)
The developer, the developer's successors-in-interest or assignees,
shall be responsible for all parkway landscaping maintenance. until
such time as mintenance is taken over by the district.
5) The developer shall comply with the standards and exhlbtts In Specific
Plan No. 219.
TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 24135, AId. #1
Conditions of Approval
Page 7
The developer shall be responsible for maintenance and ~pkeep of all
slopes, landscaped areas and Irrigation systems untt1 such ttme as those
operations are the responsibilities of other parties as approved by the
Planntng DIrector,
Street 11ghts shall be provtded wtthtn the subdivision In accordance with
the standards of Ordinance 46Z and the following:
Z) Concurrently vrlth the ftllng of subdivision Improvement plans ~ith the
Road Department, the developer shall secure approval of the proposed
street light layout first from the Road Department's traffic engineer
and then from the appropriate utility purveyor.
z)
Follo~ng approval of the street 11ghttng layout by the Road
Department's traffic engineer, the developer shall also file an
application wtth LAFCO for the fomatton of a street lighting
district, or annexation to an extsttng 11ghting district, unless the
stte Is vrlthtn an extsttng 11ghttng district.
3)
Prior to recordatton of the ftnal map, the developer shall secure
conditional approval of the street lighting application from LAFCO,
unless the site ts wtthln an extstlng 11ghtlng district.
4)
All street ltghts and other outdoor 11ghttng shall be sho~n on
electrical plans submitted to the Department of Butldtng and Safety
for plan check approval and shall comply ~th the requirements of
Riverside County Ordinance No. 655 and the RIverside County
Comprehensive General Plan.
Prior to recordation of the final map, an Environmental Constraints Sheet
(ECS) shall be prepared tn conjunction with the final map. to delineate
identified environmental concerns and shall be permanently filed with the
office of the County Surveyor. A copy of the ECS'shall be transmitted to
the Planning Department for revte~ and approval· The approved ECS shall
be forwarded with coptes of the recorded final map to the Planning
Department and the Department of Building and Safety.
The following note shall be placed on the Environmental Constraints
Sheet: 'County Slope Stability Report No, 89 was prepared fo~ this
property and ts on ftle at the RIverside County Planntng Department.
Spectftc ttems of concern tn the report are as follows: slope
stability.'
Prtor to the lssuance of GRADZNG PERNZTS the following conditions shall be
satisfied:
TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 24135, Amd. #1
Conditions of Approval
Page 8
be
P~oF ~e the 4sseaeee e~ g~ad~eg pee.~la~ 4he app;~ea.~ ska~ ebia~.
e~eawaeee fPem lhe Vvi. Fish and
e,~sleeae ef lke iteWkeesz KaegaPee Rat s$le. (Deleted -Planntng
Conm~tsston -Aprtl 12. 1989)
Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall comply
with Ordinance No. 663 by paying the fee required by that ordinance.
Should Ordinance No. 663 be superseded by the provisions of a Habitat
Con;ervatton 'Plan prior to the payment of the fees required by
Ordinance No. 633, the applicant shall pay the fee required under the
Habitat Conservation Plan as implemented by County ordinance or
resolution.
Prior to the issuance of g~adieg building permits detailed con~non open
space area landscaping and irrigation plans shall be submitted for
Planning Department approval for the phase of development in process.
The plans shall be certified by a landscape architect, and shall
provide for the following: (Amended - Planning Commission - April 12,
1989)
1. Permanent automatic irrigation systems shall be installed on all
landscaped areas requiring irrigation.
2. Landscape screening where required shall be designed to be opaque
up to a minimum height of six {6) feet at maturity.
All utility service areas and enclosures shall be screened from
view with landscaping and decorative barriers or baffle
treatments, as approved by the Planning Director. Utilities shall
be placed underground.
Parkways and landscaped building setbacks shall be landscaped to
provide visual screening or a transition into the primary use area
of the site. Landscape elements shall include earth benning,
ground cover, shrubs and specimen trees in conjunction with
meandering sidewal ks, benches and other pedestrian amenatlas where
appropriate as approved by the Planning Department.'
.5. Landscaping plans shall incorporate the use of specimen accent
'trees at key visual focal points Within the project.
Where street trees cannot be
interior streets and project
right-of-way, they shall be
right-of-way.
planted within right-of-way of
parkways due to insufficient road
planted outside of the road
7. Landscaping plans shall incorporate native and drought tolerant
plants where appropriate.
TENTATZVE TRACT NO. 24135° Amd. tl
Condtttoes of Approval
Page 9
de
A11 extsting specteen trees and significant rock outcroppings on
the subject propert~ shall be shovm on the project's gradtrig plans
and shall note those to be removed, ~elocated and/or retained.
9. All trees shall be mtnlmum double stake.
gro~ng trees shall be steel staked.
Weaker and/or slow
10..The plans shall confom to those sho~n in Spectftc Plan No. 219.
Any oak trees removed vrith four (4) inch or larger trunk diameters
shall be replaced on a ten (10) to one (1) basis as approved by the
Planning Director. Replacement trees shall be noted on approved
landscaping plans.
The following tree preservation guidelines shall
the projects approved gradtrig, building and
appropriate:
be Incorporated In
landscaping plans as
Every effort shall be made to prevent encroachment of structures,
grading or trenching wtthtn the drtpllne or twenty-five (25) feet
of the trunk of any trees, whichever ts greater.
If encroachment wlthtn the drtpltne ts unavoidable, no more than
one thtrd of the root area shall be disturbed, graded or covered
wtth impervious materials. The root area is considered to extend
beyond the drtpllne a distance equal to one half the radius.
Building, gradtrig or Improvements shall not occur wtthtn ten (10)
feet of any tree trunk.
Retaining walls shall be constructed where necessary to preserve
natural grade at least one-half the dtstance between the trunk and
the dripline. Walls shall be destgned ~th a post or catsson
footing rather than a continuous foottrig to mtntmtze root damage.
Alteration of natural drainage shall be avoided to the greatest
extent possible.
Runoff channelled near trees shall not substantially change normal
sotl motsture charactertstlcs on a seasonal basis.
Runoff sba11 not be directed towards the base of trees so that the
base of the trees remain tn wet sot1 for an extended pertod.
Nhere natural topography has been altered, drainage away from
trunks shall be provtded where necessary to ensure that water w111
not stand at the crown.
/' /
TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 24135, A,d. I1
Conditions of Approval
Page 10
Sedtmentatton and stltatton in the drainage ~ays shall be
controlled where necessary to avotd ftlltng around the base of the
trees,
Land uses that would cause excessive sot1 compactton withtn the
drtpltne of trees shall be avoided. If the areas are planned for
recreation, provtde tratls to restrtct compactton to a small area.
ileavy use under trees shall be avoided unless eeasures to minimize
compactton are undertaken.
Landscaping or Irrigation shall not be Installed wtthtn ten (10)
feet of any trees.
All existing native specimen trees on the subject property shall be
preserved wherever feasible· Where they cannot be preserved they
shall be reiDcared or replaced with specimen trees as approved by the
Planning Director. Replacement trees shall be noted on approved
landscaping plans.
All approved grading and building plans shall reflect the utilization
of post and beam foundations or the appropriate combination of split
level pads and post and beam foundations when development is proposed
on natural slopes of fifteen percent or greater measured over a
horizontal distance of thirty (30) feet·
If the project is to be phased, prior to the approval of grading
permits, an overall conceptual grading plan shall be submitted to the
Planning Director for approval. The plan shall be used as a guideline
for subsequent detailed gradtng plans for individual phases of
development and shall include the following:
1) Techniques which will be utilized to prevent erosion
sedimentation during and after the grading process.
and
2)
Approximate time frames for grading and identification of areas
which may be graded during the higher probability rain months of
January through March
3) Preliminary pad and roadway elevations
4) Areas of temporary grading outside of a particular phase
Driveways shall be deslgned so as not to exceed a fifteen (15) percent
grade.
Grading plans shall conform to Board adopted Hillside Development
Standards: All cut and/or ftll slopes, or individual combinations
thereof, which exceed ten feet in verttcal height shall be modified by
TENTATZVE TRACT NO. 24135, Alad. tl
Conditions of Approval
Page 11
7 ·
an appropriate combination of a spectal terracing (benchtng) plan,
Increased slo~tt rat1, (t.e., 3:1), retaining walls, and/or slope
planttrig com ned wtth Irrigation. A11 drheways shall not exceed a
fifteen percent grade.
All cut slopes located adjacent to ungraded natural terratn and
exceeding ten (10) feat in verttcal hetght shall be contour-graded
incorporating the following gradtng techniques:
1) The angle of the grade slope shall be gradually adjusted to the
angle.of the natural terrain,
2) Angular foms shall be discouraged· The graded fom shall reflect
the natural rounded terrain·
3)
The toes and tops of slopes shall be rounded with curves with
radii designed in proportion to the total height of the slopes
where drainage and stability permit such rounding,
4)
Where cut or ftll slopes exceed 300 feet in horizontal length, the
horizontal contours of the slope shall be curved in a continuous,
undulating lashton.
Natural features such as water courses, specimen trees and significant
rock outcrops shall be protected in the stttng of individual butlding
pads on final gradtng plans.
Prior to the issuance of gradtng permits, the developer shall provtde
evtdence to the Dtrector of Butldtng and Safety that all adjacent
off-site manufactured slopes have recorded slope easements and that
slope maintenance responsibilities have been assigned as approved by
the Dtrector of Butldtng and Safety.
Prior to the issuance of grading permits, a qualified paleontologist
shall be retained by the developer for consultation and comment on the
proposed grading ~th respect to potential paleontologtcal impacts.
Should the paleontologist ftnd the potential ts htgh for tmpact to
significant resources, a pre-grade eeettng between the paleontologist
and the excavation and gradtrig contractor shall be arranged. klhen
necessary, the paleontologist or representative shall have the
authority to temporarily dtvert, redtrect or halt gradtrig acthtty to
allow recovery of fosstl s.
Prtor to the tssuance of BUZLD/NG PERNZTS the following conditions shall
be satisfied:
1) The project shall comply wtth the requirements of Development
Agreement No. 4.
/ /
TENTATZVE TRACT NO. ;4135, Amd. tl
Conditions of Approval
Page 12
2)
3)
4)
Prtor to the submittal of butldtng plans to the Department of Butlding
and Safety an acoustical study shall be perfomed by an acoustical
engtneer to establish appropriate mitigation measures that shall be
applted to Individual dwelltng untts within the subdivision to reduce
ambient tntertor notse levels to 45 Ldn,
PrtGr to the tssuance of bulldlng pemtts, composite landscaping and
Irrigation plans shall be submltted for Planning Department approval.
landscaping and Irrigation to be ~ Including, but not 1trotted
to, parkway planting, street trees, slope planting, and Individual
front yard landscaping per the requirements of Specific Plan No. 219.
All dwellings to be constructed wtthtn thts subdivision shall be
destgned and constructed wtth fire retardant (Class B) roofs as
approved by the County Fire Marshal.
5)
Roof-mounted mechanical equipment shall not be permitted withtn the
subdivision, however solar equipment or anY other energy savlng
devtces shall be pemttted with Planntng Department approval.
6) Roof-mounted equipment shall be shtelded from view of surrounding
property.
7) Butldtng separation between all buildings excluding fireplaces shall
not be less than ten (10) feet.
8) All street stde yard setbacks shall be a mtnimum of ten (10) feet·
9) All front yards shall be provtded wtth landscaping and automatic
irrigation.
Prtor to the tssuance of OCCUPANCY PEPJqZTS the following conditions shall
be sat1 sft ed:
1) kla11 and/or fence locations and materials sba11 confom to the
approved wall and fence .treatment plan tn Spedftc Plan No. 219.
2)
All landscaping and Irrigation shall be Installed tn accordance with
approved plans prtor to the tssuance of occupancy pemtts. Zf
seasonal conditions do not pemtt planting, tntertm landscaping and
erosion control measures shall be uttllzed as approved by the Planntng
Dtrector and the Dtrector of Butldtng and Safety.
3)
All landscaping and Irrigation shall be Installed tn accordance with
approved plans and shall be verified by a Planntng Department field
Inspection.
TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 24135,
Coadtttons of Approval
Page 13
4)
Not withstanding the preceding conditions, wherever 'an acoustical
study ts requtred for notse attenuation purposes, the hetghts of
requtred wails shall be determined by the acoustical study where
applicable.
s)
Concrete sidewalks shall be constructed throughout the subdivision tn
accordance with the standards of Ordinance 461 and Specific Plan No.
219.,
6) Street trees shall be planted throughout the subdivision tn accordance
with the standards of Ordinance 460 and Spectftc Plan No, 219
Prtor to the tssuance of a butldtng pemtt, the subdivider shall prepare
and submtt a wrttten report to the P]annlng Dtrector of the County of
Riverside demonstrating comp]tance wlth those conditions of approva] and
mitigation measures of thls map and E.A. No. 33434 whtch must be satisfied
prtor to the tssuance of 8 but]dtng permtt.
The Planning Director may require Inspection or other monitoring to assure
such compliance. (Added - Planning Commission - Apt11 12, 1989)
CO:cj:gs
OFFICE OF ROAD COMMISSIONER & COUNTY SURVEYOR
Riverside County Planning Commission
4080 Lemon ~treet
Riverside, CA 92501
April 12, 1989
Mam.e+m-6r-l~89
P O. IOX momO
MJ~I:J~. CALI~OI.,I, ff~O~
l?|4; :17.6554
Ladies and Gentlemen:
Re: TR 24135 - Amend #1
Schedule A - Team SP - SND#9
*As Amended at P.C. 4-12-89
With respect to the conditions of approval for the' referenced tentative
land division map, the Road Department recommends that the landdivider
provide the following street improvement plans and/or road dedications in
accordance with Ordinance 460 and Riverside County Road Improvement
Standards (Ordinance 461). It is understood that the tentative map
correctly shows acceptable centerline profiles, all existing easements,_.
traveled ways, and drainage courses with appropriate O's, and that their
omission or unacceptability may require the map to be resubmitted for
further consideration. These Ordinances and the following conditions are
essential parts and a requirement occurring in ONE is as- binding as
though occurring in all. They are intended to be complementary and to
describe the conditions for a complete design of the improvement. All
questions regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred
to the Road Commissioner's Office.
1. The landdivider shall protect downstream properties from
damages caused by alteration of the drainage patterns,
i,e., concentration of diversion of flow. Protection
shall be provided by constructing adequate drainage
facilities including enlarging existing facilities and/
or by securing · drainage easement. All drainage
easements shall be shown on the final map and noted as
followsz 'Drainage Easement - no building, obstructions,
or encroachments by land fills are allowed". The
protection shall be as approved by the Road Department.
2. The landdivider shall accept and properly dispose of
all offsite drainage flowing onto or through the site.
In the event the Road-Commissioner permits the use of
streets for drainage purposes, the provisions of Article
XI of Ordinance No. 460 will apply. Should the
quantities exceed the street capacity or the use of
streets be prohibited for drainage purposes, the
subdivider shall provide adequate drainage facilities
as approved by.the Road Department.
TR 2il)5 - Amend #1
ae~W~-~r-lge9 April 12, 1989
Page 2
Major drainage is involved on this landdivision and its
resolution shall be as approved by the Road Department·
Street 'M' shall be improved within the dedicated right of
way in accordance with modified County Standard No. 100,
(84'/108' as approved by th~ Road Commissioner].
Streets 'B', ,p,,, .L, (north of Street 'N'), and Street "E"
(at Pio Pico Road) shall be improved within the dedicated
right of way in accordance with modified County Standard
No. 104, Section A. (50'/70' with entry median as approved
by the Road Commissioner].
The remaining interior streets shall be improved within the
dedicated right of way in accordance with County Standard
No. 104, Section A. (40'/60')
Margarita Road shall be improved with concrete curb and
gutter located 43 feet from centerline and match up asphalt
concrete paving; reconstruction; or resurfacing of existing
paving as determined by the Road Commissioner within a 55
foot half width dedicated right of way in accordance with
County Standard No. 100.
Street "A" shall be improved with 34 feet of asphalt
concrete pavement within a 45 foot part width dedicated
right of way in accordance with modified County Standard
No. 103, Section A. {24'/33', as approved by the Road
Commisioner)
Pio Pico Road shall be improved with 34 feet of asphalt
concrete pavement within a 45 foot part width dedicated
right of way in accordance with County Standard No. 103,
Section A. (22'/33')
Corner cutbacks in Conformance 'with County Standard No. 805
shall be shown on the final map and offered for dedication.
Improvement plans shall be based upon a centerline profile
extending a minimum of 300 feet beyond the project
boundaries at a grade and alignment as approved by the
. Riverside County Road Commissioner. Completion of
road improvements does not imply acceptance for main-
tenance by County.
TR 24135 - Amend ~1
Ksr{~-&s-ieee. April 12, 1989
Page 3
3e
4e
18.
19.
23.
Standard cul-de-sacs 'and knuckles and off-set cul-de-sacs
shall be constructed throughout the landdivislon~
Aspbaltic emulsion {fog seal) shall be applied not less
than fourteen days following placement of the asphalt
surfacing and shall be applied at a rate of 0.05 gallon per
square yard. Asphalt emulsion shall conform to Section 37,
39 and94 of the State Standard Specifications.
The landdivider will provide left turn lanes on Pio Pico
Road and Street "a' at all interior intersections as
approved by the Road Department.
The landdivider shall provide utility clearance from
Rancho California Water District prior to the recordation
of the final map.
The maximum centerline gradient and the minimum centerline
radii shall be in conformance with County Standard #114 of
Ordinance 461.
All centerline intersections shall be at 90° wi~h a inimunV
5 ' ~;ent m~a~ed from flow line) ~ n¢ ~T/~-,v¢~m&//4 "'-
Concrete sidewalks shall be constr~cted throughout the
landdivision in accordance with County Standard No, 400
and 401 (curb sidewalk),
The minimum lot frontages along the cul-de-sacs and
knuckles shall be 35 feet.
All driveways. shall conform to the applicable Riverside
County Standards and shall be shown on the street
improvement plans. A minimum of four feet of full height
curb shall be constructed between driveways.
The minimum garage setback shall be 30 feet measured from
the face of curb.
Prior to the recordatton of the final map, the developer
shall deposit with the Riverside County Road Department;
a cash stun of $150.00 par lot as mitigation for traffic
signal Impacts. Should the developar choose to defer the
time of payment, a written agreement may be entered into
with the County deferring said payment to the time of
lssuance of a building parmlt.
Electrical and communications trenches shall be provided in
accordance with Ordiaance 461, Standard 817.
TR 241~5 - Amend #1
.Marcb-~,-~l~J Apt1]
Page 4
12, 1989
28.
29.
30.
32.
Lot access shall be restricted on Margarita Road, Street
NM'. PiO PtCo Road, and Street 'A' and so noted on the
final map.
Landdivtsionscreating cut or fill slopes adjacent to the
streets shall provide erosion control, sight distance
control and slope easements as approved by the Road
Department.
When blockwalls are required to be constructed on top of
s18pe, a debris retention wall shall be constructed at the
street right of way line to prevent silting of sidewalks as
approved by the Road Commissioner.
The street design and improvement concept of this project
shall be coordinated with Specific Plan No. 219.
Street lighting shall be required in accordance with
Ordinance 460 and 461 throughout the subdivision. The
County Service Area (CSA) Administrator determines whether
this proposal qualifies under an existing assessment
district or not. If not, the land owner shall file an
application with LAFCO for annexation into or creation of a
"Lighting Assessment District" in accordance with
Governmental Code Section 56000.
Street lights shall be installed in accordance with
Ordinance 460 and 461 at all intersections of roads
constructed or improved within the subdivision. The county
Service Area (CSA) Administrator determines whether the
subdivision is within an existing assessment district. If
not, the land owner shall file an application with LAFCO
for annexation into or creation of a County Service Area in
accordance with Governmental Code Section 25210.1.
All private and public entrances and/or intersections
opposite this project shall be coordinated with this
project and shown on the street improvement plans.
A striping plan is required for Margarita Road, Pio Pico
Road, Street 'M" and Street "A~. The removal of the
existing striping shall be the responsibility of applicant.
'Traffic signing and striping shall be done by County forces
with all incurred costs borne by the applicant.
Should this* project lie within any assessment/benefit
district, the applicant shall prior to recordation make
application for and pay for their reapportionment of the
assessments or pay the unit fees in the benefit district
unless said fees are deferred to building permit.
TR 24135 - Amend tl
-March-i,-agig April 12, 1989
Page 5
The following conditions from Specific Plan No. 219 - Vail
Meadows shall also apply:
All road improvements, unless otherwise noted, shall be
constructed to ultimate County Standards in accordance with
Ordinance No. 460 and 461 as a requirement of the
implementing subdivisions for the Specific Plan, subject to
approval by the Road Commissioner. The proposed "Gateway
Road" is approved, in concept, subject to the submittal and
~eview of design details.
Any landscaping within public road rights of way will
require approval by the Road Commissioner and assurance of
continuing maintenance through the establishment of a
landscape maintenance district or similar mechanism as
approved by the Road Commissioner.
The Rancho Villages Assessment is an integral component of
the planning for this area. Prior to the recordation of
tract maps within this specific plan or any other project
located within the assessment district, the final actions
necessary for formation of the district must be completed.
Should the district fail, the project proponent shall,
prior to the recordation of any tract maps within the
specific plan boundaries, provide for road improvements in
accordance with Table XV-lmplementation Schedule for On-
Site Roadway Improvements and Table XVI-Implementation
Schedule for Off-Site ~oadway Improvements, as attached.
In response to the concerns 'voiced' by Caltrans relative to
cumulative impacts indicating the need to implement demand
management strategies and/or provide for the development of
additional highway corridors, the project proponent has
agreed to fund such a study to be conducted under the
direction of the Road Department as prescribed by Caltrans.
The study is currently in progress.
Very truly yours,
Elmer Baumgarten
Subdivision Engtneer
· £B:Jw
County of Riverside
FROM:
RE:
RIVERSIDE COUI~TY PLANNING DEPT. DATE: February
_ris Ormsby
6AMMARTIN~~VIRONHENTALHEALTH SPECIALIST IV
TRACT NAP 24135, Amended No, I
27, 1989
Environmental Health Services has reviewed Amended No. 1
dated February 23,192~Our currant c~---.ents ~rlll remain
as stated in our letterdated January 11, 1989.
SN:tac
J"FEB Z 8 1989 "";''
GEN. FORM 4, (]bv. ~
/
/
COUNTY OF i IVERSIDE
DEPARTMENT
of HEALTH
January 11, 1999
RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPT.
4080 Lemon Street
Riverside, CA 92502
ATTN: Chris Ormsby
RE: TRACT MAP 24135: Parcels 8 and 9 of Parcel Map 23~32
(325 Lots)
IlliI,TII liltfillS
RAMlET ITIqEIT
JaNesiNG. C;A ella0
Gentlemen:
The Department of Public Health has revieved Tentative Map
No. 24135 and reconnnends that:
IS3 II~TI4 8AC)AD%WAY
8LTVI4E. ~j. Ils'le,
.rail It&lga
TJdO MAMGUERITA
IIIVl~lll2}f.. CA lmiOd
~ellOla
COPtOga.
IS0 NOATN STATE IT.
14EIdET. Ca Isl4l
de-lOt O/JIB ITIIELrT
IND.. CA IlZO I
litel ItllllOI!
80116 FIIAIIM
iPALI IPIIIII
li'&$ Ta,HCIUITZ,eCC~
pa~em ldq~M~S. C.A SIll!
mill
Pillill. CA 91270
$lll Id122JOl eaWl}.
A water system shall be installed according to plans
and specifications as approved by the water company and
the Health Department. Permanent prints of the plans of'
the water system shall be subn~ttted in triplicate, with a
minimum scale not less than one inch equals 200 feet, along
with the original drawing to the County Surveyor. The
prints shall show the internal pipe diameter, location of
valves and fire hydrants; pipe and Joint specifications, and
the size of the main at the Junction of the new system
to the existin2 system. The plans shall comply in all
respects with Div. 5, Part 1, Chapter 7 of the California
Health and Safety Code, California Aa~4n4strative Code,
Title 22, Chapter 16, and General Order No. 103 of the
Public Utilities Commission of the State of California,
when applicable. The pls-a'shall be signed by a registered
engineer and water company with the following certification:
"I certify that the. des,an of the water system in Tract Map 24135
is in accordancewith the water system expansion plans of the
Elsinore Vallsy~micipal Water District and that the water
service, storage and distribution systemwill be adequate
to provide water service.to such tract. This certification
does not constitute a 8uarantee that ,twill supp17water to
such tract at any specific quantiCies,.flows or pressures
for fire protection or any other purpose". This certification
shall be siSned by a responsible official of the water company.
The plans must be subndtted to the County SurveTor's Office to
review at least two weeks prior to the request for the
recordation of the final map.
eeeeu:
Rtnrstde Counny Pls-~{ng Depn.
'Page Two
ATRq: Chrls Ormsby
January 11~ 1989
This DeparOnenn has a stmtemenn from the Elsinore Valley Municipal
We=at Dishrich agreeing =o serve dom&s=ic waner. no each and every
lot in =he subdivision on d--and, providing satisfactory financial
arrangemeans are completed vith =he Subdivider. In rill be necessary
for the financial arrangements to be made prior to nhe recordanion
of =he final map.
This DeparUnean has a sCaC~eat from the Elsinore Valley Municipal
Wa6er Disnrict agreeing to alloy the mubdivision sevage sysnem to
be connecned to the sewers of =he Disnrict. The sewer sysnem
shall be installed according to plans and specificanions as approved
by the Dishrich, =he Coun~ Surveyor and the Bealth Deparunen=.
Permanent prints of nhe plans of the sewer sysnem shall be submi==ed
in nriplicane, along vi=h nhe original drawing, to the Counny Surveyor.
The prinns shall shew the innernal pipe diemener, locanion of manholes,
complene profiles, pipe and ~oinn specifications and the size of nhe
sewers an the Juncnion of =he new sysnem no the exisninZ sysnem. A
single plan indicaning locanion of sewer lines and wa=er lines shall
be a portion of the sewage plans and profiles. The plans shall be
signed by a regis~ered enZine. er and the sewer disnrict winh the followin~
certification: "I cerT/fy =ha= the design of the sewer sysnem in
Tracn Nap 24135 is in accordmncevith nhe sewer sysnem expansion plans
of the Elsinore Valley Municipal Waner Disnrict and nhan nhe
wasne disposal sysnem is adequane an this time no nrean nhe annicipa=ed
washes from =he proposed tracn". The plans mus= be submin=ed no nhe
Coun=y Surveyor's Office to review a~ leash ~wo weeks prior no nhe
request for rhe recorda=ion of the final map.
In will be necessary for the financial arrangements no be made prior
to recordanion of Che final map.
Sincerely,
Environmental Real=h Services
pianlnO&r%'-* ~nSC)rx:e
46-2(~ C),is SiNe, Suite 405
kdio, CA 9220i
(619) 342-8886
~TION wm4 THE
DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY
FIRE PROTECTION
AI~F,,NJ. ~
TIP,/:
2-24-89
Pimmb~&r~-_ '--4C)!k~
4OBO Lemon.~Rei, Sujte IlL
P..~rak. C&925C)l
(714)
TO:
ATTN:
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CHRIS OEMSBY
TRACT 24135- AMENDED
With respect to the conditions of approval for the above referenced land division,
the Fire Department recommends the followinK fire protection measures be provlded
in accordance with Riverside County Ordinances and/or recognized fire protection
standards:
FlEE PROTECTION
Schedule "A" fire protection approved standard 'fire hydrants, (6"x4"x2~") located
one at each street intersection and spaced no more than 330 feet apart in any
direction, with no portion ofany lot frontage more than 165 feet from a hydrant.
Hinimum fire flow shall be 1000 GPM for 2 hours duration at 20 PSI.
Applicant/developer sh~ll furnish one copy of the water system plans to the FAre
Department for review. Plans shall conform to fire hydrant types, location and
spacing, and, the system shall meet the fire flow requirements. Plans shall be
signed/approved by a registered civil engineer and the local water company with
the following certification: 'I certify that the design of the water system is
in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Riverside County Fire
Department."
The required water system, including fire hydrants, shall be insta3/ed and accepted
by the appropriate water aSency prior to any combustible building material being
placed on an individual lot.
HAZARDOUS FIRE AREA
The land division is located in ~he "Hazardous Fire Area" of Riverside County as
shown on a map on file with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors. any building
constructed on lots created by this land division shall comply with the special
construction provisions contained in Riverside County Ordinance 546.
All road medians to be set back 30 feet from curb line at all intersections-
Subject: Tract 24135
Page 2
All buildings shall be constructed wiCh fire retardant roofing material as
described in Seccion 3203 of Che'Uniform BuildinS Code. Any rood shingles
or shakes shall have a Class "B" raCinS and she//be approved by the Fire
Department prior =o installation.
HITIGATION
Prior to Ehe recorda=ion of the finalmap, =he developer shall deposit with the
Riverside CounEy Fire Department, a cash sum of $400.00 p~r lot/unit as mitigation
for fire protee=ion impacts. Should the developer choose to defer the Eime of
payment, h~/she may en=er into a written aSreement wi=h the County deferring said
payment ~o the Eime of issuance of Ehe first building permit.
All questions regarding the meaning of conditions shall be referred Eo =he
Planning and Engineering staff.
RAYNOND H. REGIS
Chief Fire Department Planner
By
Kurt Bantwell, Fire Safety Specialist
ama
KENNETH L. !::DWARDI
eNiILe INilNleI!I
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND
WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
IIIVIRII~I, GALIle~IINIA IllOl
M rch 27, 1989 a
Illl IlallKTr IVllltP'r
P. O. BOX loll
TI, I,,I:I~NONe (7141 717-1011
Riverside County
Planning Department
County Administrative Center
Riverside, California
Attentions Specific Plan Section
Chris Ormsby
Ladies and Gentlemen=
Vesting Tract 24135
Amended Map No- I
This is a proposal to divide about 83 acres in the Rancho Cal-
ifornia area. The site is to the north of Highway 79 between
Margarita Road and Butterfield Stage Road. This project is a
part of Specific Plan 219, Vail Meadows.
The area consists of well defined ridges and natural watercourses
which traverse this property. Local offsite flows are tributary
to the site's northeast and southeast boundaries. A storm drain
is proposed along Pio Pico Road to collect the flows from the
southeast. This storm drain would be connected to an existing
120-inch diameter storm drain across the school site to the
southeast as shown on the Exhibit B. Another storm drain is pro-
posed across the middle of this property. This storm drain would
discharge the flows into two existing 42-inch diameter culverts
under Margarita Road as shown on the tentative map. Onsite flows
and other local offsite flows would be conveyed with streets and
the above two storm drains.
Following are the District's reconnnendations=
The 100 year offsite tributary flows should be collected
and safely conveyed through the site to an adequate
outlet.
Onsite drainage facilities located outside of road right
of way ahould be contained within drainage easements
shown on the final map. A note should be added to the
final map stating, sDrainage easements shall be kept free
of buildings and obstructionss·
Offsite drainage facilities should be located within
publicly dedicated drainage easements obtained from the
affected property owners. The documents should be
recorded and a copy submitted to the District prior to
recordation of the final map.
-2- March 27, 1989
Riverside County
Planning Department
Rez Vesting Tract 24135
Amended Map No. i
4- All lots should be graded to drain to the adjacent street
or an adequate outlet.
The 10 year storm flow should be contained within the
curb and the 100 year storm flow should be contained
within the street right of way. When either of these
criteria is exceeded, additional drainage facilities
should be installed.
Drainage facilities outletting sump conditions should be
designed to convey the ~ributary 100 year storm flows·
Additional emergency escape should also be provided.
The property's street and lot grading should be designed
in a manner that perpetuates the existing natural
drainage patterns with respect to tributary drainage
area, outlet points and outlet conditions, otherwise, a
drainage easement should be obtained from the affected
property owners for the release of concentrated or di-
verted storm flows. A copy of the recorded drainage
easement should be submitted to the District for review
prior to the recordation of the final map.
Temporary erosion control measures should be implemented
iu.,,ediately following rough grading to prevent deposition
of debris onto downstream properties or drainage
facilities.
Development of this property should be coordinated with
the development of adjacent properties to ensure that
watercourses remain unobstructed and stormwaters are not
diverted from one watershed to another. This may require
the construction of temporary drainage facilities or
offsite construction and grading.
0e
A portion of the proposed project is in a floodplain and
my affect =waters of the United States', =wetlandss or
-Jurisdictional streambeds', therefore, in accordance
with the requirements of the National Flood Insurance-'
Program and Related Regulations (44 CFR, Parts 59 through
73) and County Ordinance No. 458z
A c oFf of appropriate correspondence and necessary
permits from those government agencies from which
approval is required byFederal or State law (such as
Corps of Engineers 404 permit or Department of Fish
and Game 1603 agreement) should be provided to the
District prior to the final District approval of the
project.
R~verside County
Planning Department
Re~ Vesting Tract 24135
Amended Map No. I
-3-
March 27, 1989
Major flood control facilities are being proposed. Th~se
should be designed and constructed to District standards
including those related to alignment and access to both
inlets and outlets. The applicant should consult the
District early in the design process regarding materials,
hydraulic design and transfer of rights of way.
All flood control facilities should be constructed to
District standards. And all facilities that the DistrAct
will assume for maintenance will require the payment of a
one time maintenance charge equal to the 'present worthm
of maintenance costs from the time of acceptance through
1998.
A copy of the improvement plans, grading plans and final
map along with supporting hydrologic and hydraulic
calculations should be submitted to the District via the
Road Department for review and approval prior to
recordation of the final map. Grading plans should be
approved prior to issuance of grading permits.
Questions concerning this matter may be referred to Robert Chiang
of this office at' 714/787-2333.
Very truly yours,
KENNETH L. EDWARDS
/J_OHN H..~ASHUBA
Senior Civil Engineer
Robert Bein, William Frost
and Associates
RCxpln
~anuary 18,. 1989
Administrative Center, 1777 Atlanta Avenue
Riverside, CA 92507
Riverside County Planning ~epartment
Attentio~z Ron Goldman
County Administra~ive Center
4080 Lemon Street.
Riverside, CA 92501
RE: Vesting Tract 24135
Ladies and Gentlemenz
The Land Use Division ~f the Department of Building and Safety
has the following comments and conditionsz
Prior to the issuance of building permits, the developer shall
obtain Planning Department approval for all on-site and off-
site signage advertising the sale of the subdivision pursuant
to Section 19.6 of Ordinance 348.
Prior to issuance of building permits, proposed lighting must
be in conformance with Mount Palomar Lighting Plan, Zone B.
per Ordinance 655.
Fireplaces may encroach 1' into required minimum 5' side'yard
setback.
Mechanical equipment may not be located in required minimum
side yard setback.
Very t~uly yours,
Thomas H. lngram, DirectOr
DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING AND SAFETY
Administration (714) 682-8840 · (714) 787-2020
~ es
STATE OF C,,AUFORNL~ IUSeWS$, TIANStarrAllON AND NOUING AOINCY
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
January 3, 1989
Development Review
08-Riv-79-17.376
Your Reference:
VT 2q135
Plannini Department
Attention Nr. Chris Ormsby
County of Riverside
q080 Lemon Street
Riverside, CA 92501
Dear Nr. Ormsby:
Thank you for the opportunity to review the proposed Vesting
Tract 24135 located adjacent to Nargarita Road and north of Pio
Pico Road in Rsncho California.
Please refer to the attached Development Review Form which
documents Caltrans' requirements for this project. Conformsnee
with these conditions is required for issuance of an Encroachment
Permit.
If any work is necessary within the state highway riSht of way,
the developer must obtain sn encroachment permit from the Caltrsns
District 8 Permit Office prior to beginning work.
additional information is desired, please call Nr. Thomas J.
Neville at (71q)
Very truly yours,
..~tr'.'N'~.N, LEWANDOWSEI
District Permits Engineer
Att·
(Your' Refe'e~e)
.- --. Plan Checker
WE WOULD LIKE TO NOTE:
CALTRANS DEVELOPr4E~ REVE~ FQ
Date
(C~ Rte PM)
· I~en plans are sutanitted, please conform to the requirements of the attached
.. wHandoutw. This will expedite the review process and time required for Plan Check.
Altho~h the traffic and drainage generated by this proposal do not appear to have
a significant effect on the state highway systeu, consideration must be given to
the cmnulative effect of continued develotxnent in :his area· Any measures
necessary to mitigate the ctmulative impact of traffic and drainage srmll be
provided prior to or with develotxnent of the area that necessitates them.
b/ It appears that the traffic and drainage generated by this proposal could have a
significant effect on the state highway system of the area. Any measures necesssry
to mitigate the traffic and drainage impacts shall be included with the development.
:..
This portion of state highway is included in the California Master Plan of State
Highways Eligible for Official Seelie Bighway Designation, and in the future your
agency may wish to have this route officially designated as a state scenic high~y.
This portion of state highway has been officially designated as a state scenic
highway, and develo~xnent in this corridor should be canpatible with the scenic
highway concept.
V/ It is recognized that there is considerable public concern about noise levels
adjacent to heavily %x~veled highways. Land development, in order to be compatible
with this concern, my require special noise attenuat&on measures. Develo~nent of
property should include any necessary noise att~uation.
WE REQUEST THAT TFJE ITEMS CHECKED BELOW BE INCLUDED IN TdE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR
THIS PROJECT:
Normal right of way dedication to provide rail-width on the state highway.
Normal street improvements to provide half-width on the state hi[~h~y.
Curb and gutter, State Standard__ along the state highway.
Parking shall be prohibited along the state high~y by painting the curb red
and/or by the proper placement of "no parking" siena.
radius curb returns be provided at intersec. tions with the state highway.
l'~ndard wheelchair ramp must be provided in t.he returns.
A positive ~ehieular barrier along the property frontage shall be provided to limit
physical access to the 'state highway.
Vehicular seeass shall not be developed directly to the state highway.
;. Vehicular seeass to the state hiShu~7-shall be provided by existing public road
connections.
Vehicular acee~___~ to the state b~.SM.'.~. &ball be provided.by standard
driveways. '. ':-:l:..
Vehicular access shall ~ot. be provided within of the intersection at
Vehicular .acce~ to the state hi~y shall be provided by a reed-type connection.
Form 8-PD19 (Rev. 5/87) ~.Cont~nued on reverse)
Date: January 3, 1989
79- ~'~TG
(Co-E=e-PM)
(Your Reference)
ADDITION~T. ~0MM~NTS:
Due to magnltude of this proposal and ~he constructlcn exp!oszon
(residential, commercial), the con=rac~ should contribute to alZ
H~ghway ~mprovemen=s necessary to maln=aln the exlsting ~rafflc flcw
patterns. In addition, i~ appears =hat thzs development
Rancho V~!lage Assessment Di~zr:ct and =herefore reccrr..enl
owner ~artic'-pa%e in the assessments for ~he
\
Vehicular access connections shall be paved at least within the state highway right
of ~'~y.
A~ess points to t,he at,abe highway shall be developed in a manner t,hat ~-11 provide
-~ight, distance for __ ~ alon& the state highway.
-,.-..
Landscaping along the sta~e hig. huay shall be lo~ and forgiving in nat,ure.
A left,-turn lane, including any necessary '~ddening, shall be provided on the st,at,e
highway at, .... .
L/Consideration shall be given ~o the provision, or future provision, of
-~ignalization and lighting of t.he interaection of /~ ~/~-~-~ ~4~Z~
and the st,at,e highway.
A traffic study indieating on- an~ off-site fio~ ~atterns and vol~es, pnobable
~mpact,s, and proposed mitigation measures shall be prepared.
~dequat,e'ofY-st,reet parking, ~hich does not reqdire backing onto t,he st,ate hi~h~nay,
shall be provided.
Parking lot, ~hall be deve~ol~,d in a manner that ~-11 not cause any vehicular
movenent conflict,s, including parking stall entrance and exit, ~r~thin of
t,he ent. ranee from the state highway.
Handicap parking shall not be developed in t,he busy driveway entrance area.
Care shall be taken ~4~en developing t. his property to preserve and peerpet,uate the
exist,ing drainage pattern of the stat,e highway. Particular consideration ~hould be
given to cumulat,ive increased st,otto runoff to ~nsu~e that. a highsray drainage
L~noblem ~s no~ creat,ed.
y necessary noise ~.~J~enuation ~hall be provided as part of the development of
~h~s property.
Please refer to attacheC additional cc~ents.
REQUEST:
A copy of any conditions of approval or revised approval.
v/* A copy of any doem~nts providing additional state highmy right of way upon
recordation of the map.
WE REQUEST THE OPPORTUNITY TO REVIEW DURII~G THE APPROVAL PROCESS:
Any proposals to further develop this property.
A copy of the traffic or envlromental study.
~_/' A check print of the Parcel or .l)~et Hap.
~/A check print of the Plans. for any. 'improvements krlthtn the state highway right of
way.
check print of the Grading and ])rainage' Plans for this pro.perry when available.
D. Jm
,/.;era&era
D, IkF. laea
Riverside C~. Planning Dept.
4080 Lemon. St., 9th
Riverside, Ca 92501
SUBjECT: t"'~'(Z,Lr-T' ?_u..~.%~-~ "~'~'t.t'~_('~p q'l ) - Lbc,., ']?..'~,/'~'~
The Dtstrict ts responding to your request for comments on the subject project
relative to water and/or sewer service. The Items checked below apply to this
project review.
The subject project:
//Zs not Within EMWD's:
water service area
sewer service area-
//'Will be required to construct/provide
be served by EM~D:
the following facilities tf to
!~eWer Servtce
A~y and all necessary regionally sized onstte and offstte gravity sewers and
appurtenantworks that might (nclude monitoring mnholes, 1tit stations, force-
mains, and effluent disposal/use. Sewers will not be allowed along lot
lines/private land. Fee payment and participation tn regtonal sewers,
treatment, and.effluent dtsposal must be met. Only wastes acceptable to EHHO
regulations will be allowed.
EASTERN HUNICIPAL HATER DISTRICT
Planning Department
204.5 S. SanJacinto Street · Post Office B,,x R.~00 · San Jacinm, California g2.~8]$-i~00 · TelcpIg,ne f7]4) 92.5-7676
January 17, 1989
Bom'd of
Richard D. EllfieX
President
James A~ Darby
~. Vice President
Ralph Daily
DouZ Ku|ber2
Jon )k landin
Jeffrey I, Minider
T. C. Rowe
Officers:
8tan T. MiTls
General Manaler
Phillip I, Forbes
D~ec~or of F~nance-
Treasurer
Thomu E McAliester
Director of 0perstions
& Mainteunce
Doris V. Baker
District Secretary
McCormick · Kidman
LeZal Counsel
Riverside County Planning Department
4080 Lemon Street, 9th Floor
l~tverside, California 92501-3657
Subject: Water Availability
Reference: Vesting Tract 24135
Gentlemen:
Please be advised that the above-referenced
property is located within the boundaries of Rancho
California Water District. Water service,
therefore, would be available upon completion of
financial arrangements between RCWD and the property
owner.
Water availability would be contingent upon the
property owner signing an Agency Agreement which
assigns water management rights, if any, to RCWD.
If you have any questions, please contact Senga
Doherty at (714) 676-4101.
Very truly yours,
RANCHO C~tTFORNIA WATER DISTRICT
Bob Lemons, P.E.
Acting Director of Engineeri.ng
F012/dpt15f
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT
28061 DIAZ ROAD · POST OFFICE BOX 174 · TEMECULA, CA 92390-0174 * (714) 6764101 · FAX (714) 676-0615
DATE:
OUR REF:
UNITED STATES POST OFFICE
COI~ENTS AND RECONNEND,~TIONS
TO:
· ·
RIVERSIDZ COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
4080 LEMON ST., 9th FLOOR
RIVE.RSIDZ, CA 92501
FUTURE MODE OF DELIVERYz CENTRALIZED
CONTACT WITH THE U. S. POSTAL SERVICE IS REQUIRED BY
DEVELOPER/BUILDER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION POR DELIVERY
TYPE AND LOCATIONS.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT COORDINATOR
/
Southern California Edison Company
P. O, BOX 410
1OO LONG BEACH BOULEVARD
I,,QNG BEACH. CALIIrO~NIA IOIOI
Riverside County
Road Department
P, O. Box 1090
Riverside, CA 92502
Attention: Subdivision Section
SUBJECT: Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 24135
ra 111 d9 J -IlJe/
January 20. 1989
Please be advised that the division of the property shown on
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 24135 will not unreasonably
interfere with the ~ree and complete exercise oZ any easement(s)
held by Southern Cali~ornia Edison Company within the boundaries
of said vesting tentative tract map,
This letter should not be construed as a subordination of the
Company's rights. title and interest in and to said easement(s).
nor should this letter be construed as a waiver of any of the
provisions contained in said easement(s) or a waiver of any costs
for relocation of affected facilities.
In the event that the development requires teloration of facil-
ities. if any. on the subject property by right oZ easement or
otherwise. the owner/developer will be requested to bear the cost
of such relocation and provide Edison with suitable replacement
rights. Such costs and replacement rights are required prior =o
the performance of the teloration.
l~ additional information is required in connection wi=h the
above mentioned subject. please call Dennis C. Bazant a= (213)
491-2644.
DCB/bJW
16160-24WPC
Very Cruly yours,
aIO~,~'L . oN
cc:
Robert Rein. William Frost G A~'S0ciates
R: iDE CO UnCu,
PL&nninG DEP RClilEn;
DATE: December 28, 1988
TO: Assessor
Butldtng and Safety
Surveyor - Dave Duda
Road Department
ltealth - Ralph Luchs
Ftre Protection
Flood Control DIstrict
Ftsh& Game
U.S. Postal Servtce- Ruth E. Davtdson
U.S. Ftsh& HtldllfeServtces
COJ~qlSSIC~NER HALT ABRAHAN
RIVERSIDE COUNTY PARKS
EASTERN ]WJNICIPAL HATER CONPANY
RANCHO CALIF HATER CONPANY
SO CALIF EDISON
S0 CALIF GAS CONPANY
GENERAL TELEPNONE
CAL TRANS t8 .... ._,...
[LS INORE UN]FIi::~"'~C!'iOO"E~"~ISTR:IC, T;.'--
TENECULA UNZON SCHOOL DISTRICT
VESTING TRACT 24135 - (Sp Pl) - E.A.
33434 - Bedford Properties - Robert Be~r
William Frost & Assoc. - Rancho
California Area - First Superr(sofia1
Dtstrtct- AdJacent to l4argar~ta, N. of
P~o Ptco Road - SP Zone - 83.5 Acres
325 lots - Schedule A - No Waiver - Nod
118 - A.P. 923-230-002
Please revtew the case described above, along wtth the attached case map, A Land
Diviston Comettee meet(ng has been tentatively scheduled for January23, 1989, if
dears, It w111 then go to public heartrig,
Your co,~ents and recoarnendatlons are requested prtor to January23, 19~9 tn order that
we.my fnclude tfiem in the staff report for thTs*parttcular case.
Should you have any questions regarding this ttem, please do not besttare to contact
Chrts Omsby at 787-1363.
Planner
CONNDITS:
The Elsenote Union Htgh School Dtstrtct facilities are overcrowded
and our educational programs seriously tmpacted by Increasing
student population caused by new residential, connerctal and
industrial construction.. Therefore. pursuant to Caltfornla
Government Code Section 53080 of AB 2926 and SB 327, this dtstrtct
levtes a fee agatnst all new development pro~ects wtthtn
boundaries.
DATE: 1/4/89 SIGNATURE
PLEASE print name and title
-!080 LEMON STREET, 9TM FLOOR
RIVERSIDE CALIFORNIA 92501
(714) 787-6181
Dr. Larry Haw, Superintendent
46-209 OASIS STREET. ROOM 30.
INDIO. CALIFORNIA 9220*
(619) 342-827 '
INTI.-DIIBAIIII'MINTAL LITI'II:I
· telgig
February 9, 1989kRrR~~
TO: Chris Orsby, Planner, County Planning
IRON: Parc Brewer, Assistant Park Planner, County Pirk:X:~~
SUBJECT: Tentathe Tracts: 24131, 24132, 24134, 24135, 24136, 24137
Vat1Neadws SP 219/EZR 235
The RIverside County Parks Department appreciates the opportunity to review
the above refe'enced and offers the folioring coments:
Parks and Recreations
The DevelopEent of the proposed tracts wtll have miniml impact on existing
regtonal park facilities.
The County Parks Department also has a county-vide recreation trat1 system.
As Indicated by thts department's response to S.P. 219/[ZR 235, Nay 25, 1988
and the Planning Department's conditions of approval October 4, 1988, the
developer ns to provtde recreation tratls along the south stde of the Pauba
Road right-of-Nay and along the north stde of the De Portola Road
rtght-of-~ay. The latter ts to cross De Portola Road at the development's
western most boundary, follo~ the boundary due south and extt the stte tnto
prtvate property to the ~est. Tentative tracts 24132 and 24134 wtll tmpact
the Pauba Road recreation tratl and tentative tracts 24136 and 24137 wtll
tmpact De Potrole Road Trat1. The above mentioned tracts make no reference to
tratls or tratl easements. 1he Parks Department w111 'require these trail
locations to be shorn on a11 tract maps and that they be graded tn an
accept4ble manner, The Parks Department also requests that It be 1ts ed as
t
clearanoe agency for maps and gradtng planntngs dealing vtth this pro;lect,
Cultural and Htstorfc Resources'
_lentalive iract 24]31, Z414Z, 94134, 24135:
Conditional approval ts granted for T.T. 24131, 24132, 24134, and 24135 with
regard to Cultural and Htstorfc Resources only.
Conditions for Anprova]:
Should any prehistoric or htstortc resources be discovered or uncovered during
the gradtrig process, all york tn that ·re· wt11 cease until the resource ts
evaluated by an archaeologist, or historian and mitigation ts determined and
· pproved by the Htstory Dtvtston of the RIverside County Parks'Department and
the Archaeological Research Untt,* University of C·]tfornt·, Riverside.
Tentative Tract 24136:
Conditional approval ts granted for T.T. 24136.
Conditions for Approval:
At the ttm~ of the alignment of De Porto1· Road the historic resource
Rtv-339O-H vas not known. Thts stte was found as · result of the Htstory
Dtvtston*s ortgtn·l mtttgutton for conditions1 approval of the EXR #219
(Hay 25 1988). Although Rtv-3390-H ts located south and east of T.T.24136,
the realignment of De Porto1· Road must be resolved before final approval of
this T.T.24136 is given by the History Division.
Tentative Tract 24137:
Conditional Approval ts granted for T.T.24137.
Conditions for Approval:
Street 'A", vhtch cuts south and east off De Porto1· Road, should not be cut
or graded, etc., unttl mitigation by data collection ts completed for
Rtv-1728, Rtv-1729 and Rtv-3391-H. h
T e road vtll tmpact all three of these
sttes at present.
Any work tn T.T.24137 must ·votd parcel 16 End Rtv-1728 untt1 all
archaeological work ts completed tn that ·re·. The use of heavy equipment
anJNhere south of De Portola Road must be avoided untt1 all archaeological
work is completed and protective measures are taken to ensure the safety and
future existence of the culture1 end htstorlc resources tn that area.
Protective measures should consist of fenctng around Rtv-3390-H, being sure
not to ·11ov fenctng to t act the stte. All movable surface htstortc
resources south of De Por~oa~· Road should be photographed, recorded and
mpped, after vhtch, they my be moved vtthtn the fenced area at Rtv-3390-H.
Hovevet, the project archaeologist must dtrect end supervise the movment end
placement of these resources to Rtv-3390-H to Bake sure thetr placement vtll
not tapaCt the stte.
Although T.T.24137 ts vest of R;Iv-3390-H, the realignment of De Porto1· Road
oust be resolved and the above conditions met before ftnal approval ts granted
to the Htstory DIvision.
ns/lo,i/o376s
DIleAMITMINTAL LIt'I'll1
COUNTY OF RIVERBIDE
PLANNZNG DEPARTHENT
aanuary 31, 1989
T0: ~hrts Oresby - $pectftc Plans
FRON: Steven A. Kupferman, Engineering Geologist ~
RE: Tentative Tract 24135
Slope Stability Report No. 89
The following report has been revtewed relattve to slope stability at the
subject stte:
· Slope Stability Analysts, Tentative Tract 24135, The Keadows at Rancho
California, Rancho California, CA,' by Converse Consultants, dated December
5. 1988.
Thts report determined that:
1. All slopes proposed for the subject tract at or below a hetght of 35
feet wtll be grossly stable.
2. Both cut and ftll slopes have a htgh potential for eroslon of sandy
materials and resultant surftctal Instability,
3. Low strength paraeeters extst for claystones and siltstones.
Thts report recommended that:
1. Geologtc Inspection of all cut slopes should be conducted durtng
gradtng.
2. Buttress ftlls my be required for cut slopes wtth adverse mtertals or
conditions.
Proposed slopes st the stte should be planted soon after construction
and wt11 requtre maintenance to perform tn a satisfactory manner
through ttee.
Thts report satisfies the General Plan requirement for a slope stability
report. The recomendattons tn thts report shall be adhered to tn the destgn
and construction of thts pro3ect.
SAK:rd
R/VERS/DE COUNTY PLANNZNG DEPARTHE)IT
NEGAT]VE DECLARATZON AND NOTZCE OF DETERHZNAT/ON
EA No. :g~q~ '~
NEGATIVE DECLARATZON
Based on the/nitial Study, tt has been determined that the proposed project will not'have a
significant environmental effect·
PR~ECT DESCRX P. TZON AND LOCATION:
Roger S. Streeter, Planning Director
CONPLETED
Date 5o~-~ . ~/
Tt 11 e ~4~t)~-
Land Div Sch
Developable Lots
Open Space Lots
Existing Zones ~P
Changes of Proeosed
Zones Only Zoning
Acreage
ADOPTED
Q~ning D~rector
,~Z~' Dev. Ac }
/~ O.Sp. Ac t~
HEARING BODY OR OFFZCER
g ard of Supervisors
lanning Contnission
13 Area Planning Council
rllrli~ning Director
O (Other)
NOTZCE OF DETERNZNATZON
ACTION ON PROOECT
ir/~proval
13 Disapproval
Date
Developable Lots 2Z~' Dev.Ac Open Space Lots /9 O.Sp. Ac
ch,.9, of AZoP.P;,o--d_l.JII I
Zones Only Acreage I
The project will not have a significant effect on the environment and a Negative Declaration
RIVERS/DE COUNTY PLAttING DEPARTHENT
4080 LEHON STREET, 9TH FLOOR
RIVEP~ZDE, CA 92501
1~ ~.~ite Original - County Clerk
2,~1 C--rAry - Came File
3~ ~:~k - Sch~uling
10113)
COUNTY STAMP
=IiVE: iDE countu,
PLAnninG DEPA=IClTIEnC
ENVIRONMENTAL, ASSESSMENT FORM: ITANDARD EVALUATION
!I~AL k:_:IM!:NT ~,,A,) IIJIdBEP~ 33434 MODULE ~B~s):
~ ~ ~) ~ ~~ Vest~no Tract 24135
~ ~ Bedford Propoert~ es
~ ~ ~ ~ Chris 0ruby, Planner IZI
~CT ~O~~
within approved Specific Plan No. 219,
The site is located
PROJECT AREk ACRES R.~. ~
~ea=~C)!I$ !qldqCEL NO.(s): 923-23D-002
D. EXISTING ZI:~G: SP B ll(PRC~INr,~(:)RK~CE?
~ tqqC)P~~i;le~Ne: IS lt4EPROK~INCC~C)Rm~NCE?
F. ~ql=IEE'rRF, FEIIENCE~c The site is located East of Nargarita RB.. ~n fh~ Wp~f~rn
portion of Specific Plan No, 219,
(3- 8E~I1ON, TOWNSHP, RAN(3EDESCRIPTIONC)RATrA~"~IALECiALDE$CRIPTION: Township 85, Range 2W
The site consists of rolling hills which have been tilled, The site is vacant at
present.
L ~ GillRAt. RAN OPEN IPACl Nmm'D CONSERVATION DEIIONA110N
~] ill~rl:art dlmFmiKljlm lm la'AmasNotDaignsid mOtmn BPace"- Cr,.,,plmtm Sectionm UL N
KlN, mclD4mmm~.v~t
c:beva. Ccxmmmm,m~m. WK&mmd EamW).Vmml vl.
IL
~ (Ctmb One). This kk ,. - "n · t0 romeely to dl it-,,-Y,I h ~ land nee suitability ratings in Section III.B.
.& Inmm~wmsamrQerm(N}ueethera~.a~&d'-,-e / ,hannffud/ormissmsmay'dgnman~affectorbeaffg'Wd
tylhe r,.,,,_--t Misfu..cldllgumeam eomalmd inlho Cs,,,p,.-hp,,;%e O4meral l:bn- Fcrany iseue marka~yes Ct)wme
mkaeorddn~nae~wme,~ . :'e t c~w/ie~f. Bndingoo~bclandanymltigallonmeasumsundor~eceonV. Abo. wherelr~a~ed,
HAZARDS
Zofms(Fig. Vl.1) · Vt.12 · 1984 NCUZ Report, M.s.F.B.)
U R (Fig. VL3) ~ A B C D (1i6, V1.11)
(~~~ZoM(FiO. VL1) 13. N Railroad Noifa (Fig. Vl.13-Vl.16)
Ps u e Fe. w4; N A e c D
Zone Fk; vu) H~ehway No~e (F~O. VU7 - v~9)
s,.U_.
7_N
e_Y
s,N
11), N
11-N
S PS U R
FlockM Hazard (On41te Inapection)
ConsefvaUm ,Service Soil Surveys)
f.~cWon (U.S,DA. Soll C4mseNstion
WindErsodm&BIcMsandFi0. Vt-1,
OKL46C),kl4.2& On:L484)
Dem lnundaim Am Fig, Vl.?)
rk~e~ Fig. VL1)
(F~ VLS)
FiO- VLa)
15. ,. Other Noise
NA A B C D (Fig, %/I.11)
16. __N .Pmiect Generate Noise Affect~g
Noise Sensitive Uses (FIB. V!.I 1 )
'i?._.Y_ Noi~,Sensm.~(F"e.V:.ll)
18.__Y NrQualitylmpacts From Project
1 S. ~ PTOje~., Sensitive to Air Quality
20. ,,,JL. Water Quality Impacts From Project
21. H Project Sensitive to Water Quality
22.. __N Hazardous Materials and Wastes
23.N Hazardous Fire Ama (Fig. Vt.30-VI.31)
24.__ Other
25._.._ Other
27__ InarkanASdculbJra!Pmtewe
2L.y..
raN__
REBOURCB
ecenk= I~ghwsys Fig, VL4S)
HistodcRnoumes~~-~)
(R0, VL32-V1,33&VI,46-VL48)
(Ps~=rf.::oBic -' Rmam:ao Map)
Definluons for Land Use lultabtllty and Noise Acceptability Ratings
NA - .NotAI iJe:-ha 8 - 6enemayBultal~ PS - Providma.ySu.abme
u - C.,,mrdy .Um, ldde e - Re,Wkmd A - ~ Accept~
9 - Cc,,,diOc,,-r~A~alle4w C - 6eamnyU. ccap'-No D - LandUoeDi:o~aged
¶. CXmE~f~ANC)CX:)NS~A~M~INAllON(m}: Aoprnv~H ~ecific P1;n Nn ~lq
f, LANDUSEP~I Sout6west Territory Land Use
~ ~~~F~: off Pal~a~ Observatory S~ree~ I~gh~n~
~ ~~~FH: Southwest Area Plan (under study)
t ~~~~)~~The comprehensive policies and pro~ect
desiqn component described in Soecific Plan Nn. ~lq ,r, ~,h~, tn +h,
project. More specifically, the focus of the applicable policies is on
Planning Area 17, which encompasses the entire proposal.
Fm:mr d r.,,,_:m.'mq, inidcmle wlth mYm r0or n0tN)whelhe m'mY Public lm::ilties encllormefvices m,--~mmy mi~fficm~Uymttmct
car be raftmaid by ~ propommi. All mfm'mnomd figatom m cxmtmkwcl in N Gr.,,.4:M'mhm~ Gerwml Ptmn. ~ any imm~
mm~ yes On, write data mourcm~ ,gmn=!m m c~nm~. findings of bci, rand nWt~gmtion remus under Seetim V.
PUBUC FACILITIES AND SERVICES
1. Y Clemdmtim~.N.14V.11.)in 10,.N__
kV~PUmreelRequeedRoedm)
lie Tmmm ~ N.12 - N.13)
W~mm'(Agen=yl,.eeerm)
~meer(Ae,ncyLeamm)
Firm ~ Fig. N.1I -NAB)
Ihmm kAy memo w,l? - Iv. is)
Ichmmmmlm fmlg. IV.1T - IV. II)
~ Wade (Fig. IY.17-1V.181
Ilml~ltR! _/'_~(Imig, IV, ll-IV, l:))
13,.Y.__.
14Y__.
,,s.L.
Equeedmn Trails FaG. NAB - N241
Riv. Co~BO0 Scale Fqu mA dn Tfmjt Idaps)
Utaiem Fig. N2S · N.26)
I..Ixmdlm (Fig. N.I? - N.18)
/ Smnmk:mmm tlrmg. N.I? - N.18)
AklNNI (Fig. Ll1.2 - L18.4,
1.11,1 - LI&lO · IV,27 - IV,36)
Diml%_rm .,d , __m
C g, el mlmrt ef lm pmm:mlmct k~k",Mol:md BPmca:Pkm'm',"MEMAr m'IW'mho Vmmemm~P°micY
s~w.a", m km m~mm ~m mpm:~c ~ ~ to tm r,s,-pxmk mad or.,n,lYat: I'm
1. 8mmlem~lmrdmdmmflmm~Qm(m~
~. ffmmmdongdmlnlWmm~.lmlm;--;m~"oo~mIUx~twahmmPoeclmmmm~fdmmd~mS~nm ofthmmp~.~l~mUdocoff~
D. lelorpeftoflipmlecllllelBIn"AmeenotDeeigfkBtedllOplm~",andinotlnm~m~,~'~
laueladkxa 1, 2, t e lind 7. ~/,.,;11 ,'p ,diDnl 4, E, 6 and ? I I Is In · Community Plan.
1. f,.llld ill iOgOry~) I~l:l l]'fy k) 81{Jppoi't h p,.;OllCf pfQiOCL ,4JlO kidicste 18/ld lie type
~. df D.1 ~ Inmm D.2, wl the dlbfmN~ be mmotved st eie lw, ak~gn,;nt sta~e? Exp&ein:
4. ~ Plan des~-mk~s):
~. is 1he m,,,.; ~ee d project ol)nsaant with the pod~ and desjOt'rations of the Community
lnot. eqijn:
the F,.pKs,s ccvnl:iaNe wi{h exiting and p~Qp;ied sixTouncling land ames?
lnot. em;a~
7. Bmecl en eds kind mimJdy, i the ;,,,.;oPt oormktmnt with h CofmXsmdmlsi~ 6enefmJ Pin?
E. lal er Imeld d Ire pedect Me IB in m Open Splice end C~Ter~&ti~ cimigeaJk~ c~.F'-sae e~e following:
z bhpmpmd em.ka w.h th. d..k B)?tf nol..
Breed en Ids Inlbl sludy. IB I~ :.,.._._;,-' consimmt sdlh ese Compe~sT'41vm General Pin?
· not, ~'t .i~c! by SdmciiOn 8rid Imue Nmni:w Ihoee bsum k:lenUfying
V. leFORMATION IOURCEI, FliI:)INO I OF FACT AND MITIGATION MEASURES
A ADD. ICIL': lieORMATIO N RE(XIIED BEFORE ENVIRONMENTAL ,eVRF-e*~iENT CAN BE COMPLETED:
DATE DATE ADEQUACY
8ECTION/ lIFOIIMATI(:)N NF~IRMATION NFORMATION
ISSUE NO. REQVIRED lIEQUESTED RECEIV;D
K For each issue roeeked yes (Y) I#der Sections fiLB and IV.B, Identify the Sectbe and Iaue number end do the
togowing, lnlN fomat as shown below:.
1. Ust alf addltiond relevanldNa eoutces, lncluding agencles cemutted.
2. hte all find'age of fact reOarding environmental conpens.
3. Slate sped~ ffdtigation manures, If ide~tlfeble without requiring an environmental impact relx~rt (E.I.R.)
4. ff addltioal iniommtion is fequh~ before the environmental eraeat can be completed, reler t~
Subsectb'~ A.
5. ffadditionMeheetsaze feededtocoml:ietethiseection, check the box at the end of the sectionancl attach
the ns:see, ry ~N~t~.
~ECTION/
ISSUE NO.
IIIB.3
IIIB.4,8
IIIB.17
~OURCES, AGENCIES CONSULTED, BNDINGS OFFACT, M~IGATION MEASURES:
The General Plan designation for land use suitability pertaining to
O~nUndchg~in0 (~ c,,ifmhl~ Pn+=nfiml 4minmrf~ rmn hp mitigmt~d tn an
acceptable level throuqh conformance with the Uniform Building Code
and County ordinances.
Potential sianificant imPaCtS related to slopes and erosion includes the
visual appearance of permanently altered land forms, severe erosion of
unprotected SlOPeS and possible slope instability. The' potential impact
pertaining to visual appearance is mitigated by Development Standards
outlined in Section t)IA.6 of ~pecific Plan No. 219. The potential for
erosion is being studied in a slope stability study and the development
of specific reouirements for alluvial/colluvtal removal at the tract staqe.
Temporary groundcover will be provided to prevent erosion during the
construction phase a~ indicated in ETR No. 235.
Potential noise impacts will be determined by noise studies to be
rnnd,rt~d mlnr)43 rnmdw~y~. H(t]gat]on will include heiqht of atteqftion
wall and any other reconmnended by the noise study, Monitoring and
[ClX)N/
IIIB.18
IIIB .26
INFORMATION ~ ImlklDINQI OF FACT AND MrrI~ATION IdEAIUREI (oontln~d)
~XIRI~.~A0~I~'I[S~LT[D. RNDII~OFFA~r, MITIGA~ON MEASURES:
A statement of overriding findings was adopted by the Board of
Supervisors for .cumulatlve effects on atr quallty~hiCh cannot be fully
mitigated.
Although a smal} portion of the Site has soils suitable for agriculture
based on the General Plan, tt was detemined in EIR No. 235 that there
would be no significant tmpact due to the loss of agricultural land.
The ~ite i~ within the historic range of the Stephens' Kar~aroo Rat. A
IVR 1
il-ls
biological report prepared for The Neadows Specific Plan (SP 219) indicated
that nnn~ nf th~ ~m~r~e~ were lockted nn the ~tt~ nf thp tract, Therefore.
no mitiqation was requirld.
Thp i~mm~ h~u~ hppn di~rmm~pd and addressed ~n ~p~rifir Plan Nn, ?19.
Correspondinq environmental review is thoroughly discussed in EIR No. 235.
Impacts have been reduced to an acceptable level.
**-'1. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT DETERMINATION:
'the mmulemS uS not have a emmdicent mmect on Us m~vkor.,.mnt and a NegaUve DeciaraUon my Im
Thm ~ mule Imvm · ~ db:t on the mn~bc~~,j,~ k,v.~r. them ~ not M a mignWtoant
dJect in Ihim :mine Imp' :m the adjgmtjon tortresume dmmcftmed in 8Kton V have been mpI~WKI to the
n
PmlWlW Chris
on the envkonment and ~n Envin:mnnmonml Kpm~ ~
.... ,~;tm: January/~/1989
CITY OF TEMECULA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT
FINAL VESTING TRACT NO. ~4135-3
DATE: November ~3.1993
Streets and Drainage
Water
Sewer
TOTAL
Faithful Performance
Security
$ 308,000
69,500
70.000
$ 447.500
Material & Labor
Security
$ 154,000
34,750
35.000
$ ~3,750
Maintenance Retention
(10% for one year)
(or Bonds if work is completed)
$ 97,700
(Based on total improvements of S977,000)
Develooment Fees
Monument Security
City Traffic Signing & Striping Costs
RCFC Drainage Fee (N/A)
Signalization Mitigation Fee - SMD #9
Road & Bridge Benefit Fee
Other Developer Fees
Checking & Insoection Fees
Plan Check Fee
Inspection Fee Due
Monument Inspection Fee
Fee Paid to Date (Credit)
Total Inspection/Plan Check Fees Due
35,500
0
0
14,550
0
0
23,720.19
32,065.39
1,147.58
56,933.16
0
-4- pwOb"lagdrptW4%0111%24135-3.egn 010494
NOV-15-93 H0~11:49 C(F" ~ES~ FPI iX 714755F"~ P. 05
Ocxtober 28, Z993
XE .,. Bryon Noree]l
IWJ:)C~ INC.
27555 XneZ Road
8u,ite 2oo
TeaacuZa. CA 92591
Re: Paloma del sol
· Grant Deed
Dear Mr. Noreen:
Devalopaent agreesent ;--el~tance
Park located in Plarddng Area
Sections 12.5 and 12.6 of 0*valop~nt~t provide
that Xespfwoulddevelop and grant in feet o the City an 8 acre
park located vlthin PlanningArea 37 (=PA-3?a). Thepark has now
been completed, and ShavnNels~n, thsCumunltySarvicls
Director, had orlginallypropossdtoreceesendaeceptanceof the
grant deed at the October 26 1993 CouncllNee~_ng Nowever the
City discove,~ed that there ~,m a SG33,000 lien ~o~ kBseB~m'e~ '
District No. 159 (aAD 159") on Parcel No. 2 of ParoelMap 23432,
which Parcel includes the Park site, ar. Nels0~askedCsabeXo
of your cosparty to remove this encumbrance. ~hsn Nr, Xo refused,
Mz'. Nelson took the park aooe~ of~ the October 261h Ageride,
On behalf of the City of Teseculao X mR. asking you to
reconsider this decision and arrange Zor the grant of the park
P. 07
October ::18, 1993
Page 2
On behalf of the City of -,~xe~,a-, I am asking you to
reconsider this declsioa mad arrange-for the grant of the park
tree of this entombcanoe. ~he basis of this request ls am
foll~sx
1. Sectjan Z2.S of tie DevsloSmsnt .t provides
that K--. ~x is to grant the park is fee to the ~~-Civll Code
section 1113 provides ~bat ~neVer a grant deed is executed
conveying a fee st~ple estate, there is an isplisd covenant that
at the time of execution, the estate is sfree fram
done, made or suffered by the grantor,
or any parson claiming
under him. w Civil Code 8e(~tion 1114 defines wencuadarancmss to
include "taxes, assessments and all liens upon reel property.
2 ,. It As apparently St. xo's contention that the City
should be responsible for the ~D 159 lion because the creation of
the park acreage resulted in a loss of development units.
Hoeever, it no~ appears that the park will not prevent Xesper
from a~hieving the 590 unit targe~ density for PA-6.
Developsent of Palm del Sol is governed by the Palm
Del Sol Specific Plan ("SP"). P&-~ of the 2P, ~-No. l,
had a target density of 590 units at · density of 15 du/aore
spread over 37.8 mores. Amendment N~. 3 of the 8P provided for
an 8 acre park and 492 ullits at a density of 16.5 d~/acre spread
over 29.8 acres.
upon reviewing this matter with the kssessmmat DistriCt
Engineer for M} 159, we learned that the actual total acreage of
Pl-l, PA-6 and PA-37 is 83.13 mores. However, a~ to the
Specific Ples, PA-1, PA-6 and Pa-3? are cnnnalatlvely ?4.2 acre.
The difference betwees the t~o is 8,89 ac~es, This could yield
an additional 146.69 dwelling units a= 16.5 du/acre, or a total
of 638.39 units in PA-6.
NOV-IS-93 HON 1]-'49 BRS CO"""' )t:SA
October 28 · 1993
Page 3
FAX NO. 714755F~'q
P. 06
Zt Is my undarm~ that gemper My prefer to
allocate this additional egreage ta t.n,~-:-'~,c the part to 9.5
acres and 1natease the oelmereJal Rareage In PA-1. ]~gax~lless,
these additional acres provlde rapar ~ttal develolment
potan 1el, and are the approprInte place for Xempe~ ~o reallocate
~evZy fonnA 9 acre.
3. Zt has been
icesmerit Bngluoe~ f:or iD 159 to reallocatm any assessment
beZn~ PFoi~,, withIn the subdivIsion when a pezk has
was3:, y ~i aim del $ol. tbam t~ts PMap°'
r~o~ld be a~lled be~e. Mo~.~v--,
~icq~larly aL~roprlate given t!~t b adAltt0~l ) acres vllZ
eve aZte~ the useassent 18 mlZooated. ~o U~e end, the City
is applylnq to kD 159 to zealloeate
4. Finally, ve bare also discovered that t~e~e
~ enouabz~ on t~e pa~. Campanula Way Is a 1. -'-ded
street that has been reallgned to ab~b the park. 2b reoarded
stzeet runs through the park. k/'ozm the park my be
Kernper must apply tor neation of so/de (~!p4~m kit
dedication of the new allgnmant.
again, on ]Mhalf of the city, and partleularly the
adults and chlldzen who will le usezs of thls )azk, m~ to curs
th~ breach of the Developaent ~greement, I request that you
arrange for the removml of the usmsmment lien fm the park, and
the realignment of Campanula Way.
HOV-I5-93 HOH 11:51 B$1S (XF""' liSA FP.X HO. 714755F"'q P. 08
~ 28, 1993
Page ·
Please Ieel fee to call me if you have any ~ions or
if I my be el further assistance,
Scott Y. Field
c~y AL~my
Mr. Shawn Nelson, Directmr of Community Services
Dennis _~14- ek, ls~. (pe~ 2e~tiun 23 of the Development
~reement)
Dennis O'Netl, Esq. (Ix~ Mien 23 o£ 4~e Development
XgTeeme~t)
NOV-IS-g3 HON ]1:47 ~ C(Y"" I~SA
~, I
NO. 71475'5F''t]
P, 03
27555 Ynn Road, Sadle2{~Tnnn:ula. Caltfomia 92591, 9091694-0666 · F'ax:9091694-0749
Nm'nnber 4, 1993
Mr. DaveDixmn
City of Tem~c,d-
43174 Businns Pa~ Drive
Te, n,-eql~t. CA 92~90
Re: :Phirim. del ~
On Novemlxz 1. 1993, Iwc~v,.d aleu~from Ci~Attonmy~Frjd nameruing
the Paloma dd Sol ~ A~,t, acd and ~he ~en,~,--, by the City So m:ept
Patk located in Planning At~ 6. luhil lelXer. lvfr. l:ieldpu,iru,.is to,.,..~.,s~fied:e Cky in
advisingmedatl~e t~mafcrofll~mbJeetPatkwill notbeaccqmsdwtthan~AD 1~9
refusalbylimCitytoacceptthclra_n_n_n_n_n_n_n_n_n_~oftlmpatlc. lwottldlnm-Ioconncntbrie~yon
eachof these issues.
Mr. Fr. ld indicates that ~-$ Io Section 12.5 of our Dev~ Ag,,.cnz~ with
caum to be ded~ut~ in f~...to City aM City sgms lo a:cq~patk laM,..., Section 12.8
bCity. Itwas only th=n~t~~. Fields' letter iqdk. wHngthataFantdeed
means that the t, nlx.-ty is m be "free fkmn e,rnmbram:es." h--~t~i~ I!s: ~.,.~fS,n,,nt district
tien. We can find nothing h the Devetol~ Ar.n.c~-.l, mt an3r of our files, Milch
i~icatc th= C~ ~ oer ~ I~ com~ ml ~ tlj mS jeer Rak fi'ec and
clear of any "~".~--.,,,-~' ]je'n.
th~ city is under an afrmm~ve oblig~,~m to sazel~ te Park and ta,,tkic all of the fledits
wcarce~titledto. ~ne only obligation placcd upon ~ was to pmvide tbc park with
cettaini~-,dtbentouamfertlmpatktotheCity. PurmmnttoScctionl2.~,
the City is under affirmative obligation to now actz~ the Padr.
NOV-15-93 HON 11:48
November 4o 199~
FAX NO. 7147555'
P. 04
Nen, Mr. Field hvaP~es that ~c City is apply~ w ,~--es~ew ~ 1~9 We
"reallocaZ" Ils -~s~s~w,4. I !mve dmsdy noiifiea Mr. ]kazl '%lmmpou of Webb &
Associates that w/riDe the C'ity nmy inquin: canrzruioi issues mhmd to fits/k,-seasn~mt
DBnia, itcertminlYcaonot~m~.,,,ortsbnymc6onwlaLreS~soZzWmymatK4anZzr
owns,
Finally, Mr. Fzld i~k-ales hal tins is ~v~np-hrm~m fiz Park ffia~
lobe resolved. lnfaa, Mr. Koofour offios lms wostzxl wil~fiae Cily innsolving lhsl
Ocwber27, ~993, Mr. Oisp of~e C/sy mnvised~. Komsso~ow~zlm~is should
proceed m nssolve ~ Csml~smh Way issue. Wc ale h
Unless you ma advise me of any 4o~,,,,,em~tion ff pmvi~. us say docsmpm~ which
!esdW aconlntry~slalzzlhemin, fi~Cilysmstmazlzbu~ofl~palkas
Citymustnowgramgaefeeaediisswwesreenddwiw.
Shn~ely,
KEMPER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CO.
ITEM NO.
24
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
,~Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
January 11, 1994
Status Report on Winchester Road Bridge Widening and Loop Ramp,
Overland Overcrossing, and Margarita Road Widening North of Rancho
California Road
RECOMMENDATION:
Receive and file.
BACKGROUND:
A brief status report of each project follows:
Winchester Road Looo
Discussions have been completed with representatives of the Federal Highway Administration
and Caltrans regarding the widening of the Santa Gertrudis Bridge. It was verbally agreed that
the City would be granted a design exception to the required transition length of the
northbound merging lane thereby eliminating the need to widen the Santa Gertrudis Bridge.
The project report was submitted to the Caltrans District Office on December 14, 1993, and
the bridge plans will be submitted to the Caltrans Division of Structures in Sacramento on
January 20, 1994. A project schedule is attached for your review.
Additionally a submittal to Caltrans to obtain an encroachment permit for Winchester Road
west of I-15 is scheduled for January 21, 1994. The project includes widening Winchester
adjacent to Jack-In-The-Box to provide an additional travel lane and widening the corner
section at the end of the south bound off ramp to improve right hand turning movements
adjacent to the Car Wash.
Overland Drive Overoass
Caltrans required the horizontal alignment be revised to remove a curve from the portion of
the structure that they will maintain. Our consultant, J.F. Davidson Associates Inc., is now
completing the project report and design work. A schedule is attached for your review.
-1- ped)S~gdrpt~94~011 l~winbw.mr 010594
Maroarita Road Widenino
Verbal agreement has been reached with representatives of Kemper Community Development
Company regarding reimbursement of the construction costs associated with the widening of
the east side of Margarita Road between Rancho California Road and La Serena Way to
ultimate width. The City will loan Kemper the funds necessary to construct the roadway and
Kemper will reimburse the City through s surcharge on building permits. Currently, Kemper
is preparing a street light plan and obtaining construction bids. The City Attorney's office is
preparing the reimbursement agreement and it will be brought to the Council for approval.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
-2- pwOb'~gdrptl141D111%winbw.nv 010594
WINCHESTER ROAD INTERCHANGE
Project Report
Actual Submittal
Anticipated Approval
December 14, 1993
April 4, 1994
Bridge Plans
Submittal
Anticipated Approval
January 20, 1994
June 3, 1994
PS &E
95% Submittal
Submit to HQ (After District Approval)
Submit Final PS & E
December 17, 1994
April 7, 1994
June 3, 1994
Begin Bid Package Preparation/
Sign Agreement
R/W Acquisition Approval Advertise
Award Contract
Begin Construction
June 20, 1994
October 17, 1994
December 19, 1994
January 4, 1995
-3- pwOS~gdrpt~94~0111%winbw.mr 010594
OVERLAND OVERCROSSING ~,,
Proiect Reoort
Actual Submittal
Anticipated Approval
February 28, 1994
June 24, 1994
Bridge Plans
Submittal
Anticipated Approval
March 31, 1994
July 15, 1994
PS&E
95% Submittal
Submit to HQ (After District Review)
Submit Final PS & E
March 18, 1994
April 15, 1994
September 12, 1994
Begin Bid Package Preparation/
Sign Agreement
RRV Acquisition Approval Advertise
Award Contract
Begin Construction
September 26, 1994
January 23, 1995
March 20, 1994
April 3, 1995
-4- pwOb"~gdfpt~94%011 l~winbw.nv 010594
ITEM
25
TEMECULA COMMUNITY
SERVICES
DISTRICT
ITEM
1
MINUTES OF A SPECIAL MEETING
OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 30, 1993
A special meeting of the City of Temecula Community Services District was called to order '
Tuesday, November 30, 1993, 6:35 P.M., Murrieta City Hall Council Chambers, 26442
Beckman Court, Murrieta. Vice President Jeff Stone presiding.
PRESENT: 4 DIRECTORS: Mufioz, Parks, Roberts, Stone
ABSENT: I DIRECTORS: Birdsall
Also present were City Manager David Dixon, Assistant City Manager Woody Edvalson, City
Attorney Scott Field and City Clerk June S. Greek.
PUBLIC COMMt:NT
None
CONSFNT CALENDAR
It was moved Director Parks, seconded by Director Roberts to approve Consent Calendar Item
No. 1.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
1.
4
0
1
Minutes
1.1
1.2
DIRECTORS: Mu~oz, Parks, Roberts, Stone
DIRECTORS: None
DIRECTORS: Birdsell
Approve the minutes of the meeting of November 9, 1993;
Approve the minutes of the meeting of November 23, 1993.
GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT
None
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY S;RVICES REPORT
None
CSDMIN11/30/93 -1 -
12/1 o/93
COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION NOVEMBFR 30. 1993
BOARD OF DIRI:CTORS RI:PORTS
None
ADJOURNMs:NT
It was moved by Director Parks, seconded by Director Roberts to adjourn at 6:40 P.M. The
motion was unanimously carried.
The next regular meeting of the City of Temecula Community Services District will be held on
Tuesday, December 14, 1993, 8:00 PM, Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street,
Temecula, California.
ATTEST:
President Patricia H. Birdsall
City Clerk June S. Greek
C81)MIN11/30/93 -2- 12/10/93
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
HELD DECEMBER 14, 1993
A regular meeting of the Temecula Community Services District was called to order at 8:35
PM, 22816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California. President Patricia H. Birdsall presiding.
PRESENT: 5 DIRECTORS: Mu~oz, Parks, Roberrs, Stone, Birdsall
ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None
Also present were General Manager David F. Dixon, City Attorney Scott F. Field and Agency
Secretary June S. Greek.
PUBLIC COMMFNT
None given.
CONSFNT CAI mMDAR
It was moved by Director Mui~oz, seconded by Director Parks to approve Consent Calendar
Items 1-3. The motion was unanimously carried.
Combining Ralance Sheet as of Seotember 30. 1993 and Statement of Revenues.
Exoenditures and Chennes in Fund ealance for the Three Months Fnded Seotember 30.
1993
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1
Receive and file the Combining Balance Sheet as of September 30,
1993 and the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in
Fund Balance for the Three Months Ended September 30, 1993.
2. Solicitation of Construction Bids for the Soorts Park SIooe Reoair Proiect (PW93-06)
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1
Approve the construction plans and specifications and authorize the
Department of Public Works to solicit public construction bids for the
Sports Park Slope Repair Project (PW93-06).
e
Award of Professional Services Contract for Materials Testing During the Constr-ction
of Pala ~ommunitv Park (PW93-O3CSD)
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1
Award a Professionel Services Contract to Geotachnical &
Environmental Engineers, Inc. (GEE) to provide material testing services
Minuas/121483 -1- 01/04/94
CSD Minutes
December 14. 1993
during the construction of Pale Community Perk, Project No. PW93-
03CSD, in the amount not to exceed $21,210 and authorize the
President to execute the contract.
DISTRICT BUSINESS
4. Election of President
It was moved by Director Roberrs, seconded by Director Mufioz to nominate Director
Jeff Stone as President of the TCSD to preside until the end of calendar year 1994.
The motion was unanimously carried.
5. Election of Vice President
It was moved by Director Parks, seconded by Director Roberrs to nominate Director
Patricia H. Birdsell to serve as TCSD Vice President until the end of calendar year
1994. The motion was unanimously carried.
6. Loma l inda Park Imorovements - Phase II
Recreation Superintendent Herman Parker presented the staff report.
It was moved by Director Parks, seconded by Director Stone to approve staff
recommendation as follows:
6.1
Appropriate $225,000 from Quimby Fees to the Capital Projects
Account for the construction of Loma Linda Park - Phase II.
The motion was unanimously carried.
It was moved by Director Parks, seconded by Director Stone to reconsider Item No. 2. The
motion was unanimously carried.
Solicitation of Construction Bids for' the Sports Park SIooe Reoair Project (PW 93-06)
Director Parks questioned the amount of expenditure in this area, and asked why such
· small percentage is being refunded by FEMA. Finance Officer Mary Jane McLarney
explained that FEMA auditors have to relate actual damage to the slope during the
rainstorm and the estimate is for complete repair of the slope.
Director Parks asked that this matter be continued to allow Board Members the
opportunity to review the plans and space for this work.
Minetee/121493 -2- 01/04/14
CSD Minutes December 14. 1993
It was moved by Director Parks, seconded by Director Stone to continue to the
meeting of January 11 th. The motion was unanimously carried.
GENERAL MANAGERS REPORT - Dixon
General Manager Dixon excused the absence of Director of Community Services Shawn
Nelson due to illness and complimented the Community Services Department staff for
preparing and stepping in at last moment.
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT - Nelson
None given.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS
None given.
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Director Stone, seconded by Director Parks to adjourn at 8:47 PM to a
meeting on January 11, 1994, 8:00 PM, Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street,
Temecula, California. The motion was unanimously carried.
Patricia H. Birdsell, President
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk/Board Secretary
~ell 21492 -3- O!/04494
ITEM
NO.
2
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
Community Services Board of Directors
Dave Dixon, General Manager
January 11, 1994
Amendment to the Solicitation of Construction Bids for the Sports Park
Slope Repair Project (PW93-06).
PREPARED BY:
(~hawn D. Nelson, Director of Community Services
Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Board of Directors approve the construction plans and specifications and authorize
the Department of Public Works to solicit public construction bids for the Sports Park Slope
Repair Project(PW93-06).
BACKGROUND:
As a result of the concerns raised at the December 14, 1993 Council Meeting and the
subsequent discussions with staff, the project will be revised so that the existing 1.5: 1 slope
will be reconstructed at a slope of 2:1 to increase the stability of the slope and reduce the
potential for erosion. Additionally, the materials excavated from the channel will be stockpiled
onsite and utilized for the proposed slope reconstruction. This will result in the following
changes to the engineer's estimate. The revised engineer's estimate for the slope repair is
$148,779 (formerly $135,079); for the associated landscaping and irrigation is $42,600; and
for the channel improvements is $116,730 (formerly $140,040).
The total estimated cost for construction of the items included in the base bid and additive
bids "A" and "B" is $308,109.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The project is being funded through Fund Balance in the TCSD - Community Services, Parks,
and Recreation budget. The slope repair and channel improvement portions of the project are
eligible for reimbursement from the Federal Emergency Management Agency(FEMA). The
original reimbursement estimate prepared by FEMA in conjunction with the City is $6,513 for
the slope repair and $46,132 for the channel improvements.
-1- pw13%agdl'p694%0111%pw93-OG,eup 0105
ITEM
NO.
3
APPROVA
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
Board of Directors
FROM:
David F. Dixon, General Manager
DATE:
December 10, 1994
SUBJECT:
Contract Amendment-California Landscape, Inc.
PREPARED BY: ~
RECOMMENDATION:
Bruce A. Hartley, Maintenance Superintendent
That the Board of Directors:
Amend contract for landscape maintenance services with California Landscape, Inc. to include
the addition of Paloma Del Sol Park.
BACKGROUND: Paloma Del Sol Park was built for dedication to the-City of
Temecula by Kemper Development Corporation. The City will be responsible for the
maintenance of the park as of January 26, 1994. The contractor currently responsible for
maintaining the City's Neighborhood Parks is California Landscape. This contractor submitted
the lowest bid for park maintenance when the public bid was released in March, 1993. It is
recommended that the maintenance of Paloma Del Sol Park be added to the existing contract.
FISCAL IMPACT: The cost for the maintenance of Paloma Del Sol Park will be
93582.81 per month. Sufficient funds have been budgeted in the existing Community
Services, Parks and Recreation Budget for Fiscal Year 1993-94.
AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
The Agreement dated May 11, 1993, between the City of Temecula, and California
Landscape, Inc., (hereinafter referred to as "Agreement") is hereby amended as
follows:
RE: Landscape Maintenance Services
Section 1
Term of the Agreement is extended through June 30, 1995.
Section 2
The Scope of Work is hereby amended by adding the following:
Landscape Maintenance Services per City of Temecula Specifications for the following
area: Paloma Del Sol Park.
Section 3
Compensation for services shall be total compensation of all services described in the
Amendment and shall be payable monthly not to exceed $3,582.81.
Section 4
All other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain the same.
The parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date and year above written.
CONTRACTOR
By: By:
California Landscal;)e, Inc.
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CITY OF TEMECULA
David F. Dixon
General Manager
Scott F. Field, City Attorney
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
3b~o~traet~cmi2.am, ln
ITEM
NO.
4
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY ~
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
Board of Directors
FROM:
David F. Dixon, General Manager
DATE:
January 11, 1994
SUBJECT:
PREPARED BY:
RECOMMENDATION:
Acceptance of Grant Deed for Paloma Del Sol Park - Kemper
Community Development Company.
Beryl Yasinosky, Management Assistant
That the Board of Directors:
Accept a grant deed from Kemper Community Development Company for Paloma Del Sol
Park, a 9.50 acre sports complex within the Paloma Del Sol Development, subject to the
vacation proceedings of Campanula Way.
BACKGROUND: On December 8, 1992, the City Council approved an Amendment
and Restatement of the Development Agreement between the City of Temecula and Bedford
Development concerning the Paloma Del Sol Specific Plan. Pursuant to this amended
Development Agreement (PA92-0013), Bedford was required to deliver to the City a fully
developed eight (8) acre sports park complex within Planning Area 37 of Specific Plan No.
219.
As sucessors in interest to Bedford Development, Kemper Community Development Co. is
dedicating a 9.50 acre park, named Paloma Del Sol Park, to the City. The park is located at
the southeast corner of De Portola Road and Campanula Way. The amenities of the park
include two (2) baseball fields with soccer overlays, ball field lighting, bleachers, a 1200
square foot rest room/snack bar facility, picnic tables, benches, signage, drinking fountains,
refuse receptacles, walkways and on-site parking.
The information regarding the vacation of Campanula Way has been submitted to the
Department of Public Works and is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the City Council
on January 25, 1994.
FISCAL IMPACT: Pursuant to the amended Development Agreement, Kemper
Community Development Co. will receive a maximum credit of ~2,000,000 towards City
Public Facilities Fees for developing Paloma Del Sol Park and a future 7.44 acre park site
based upon actual improvement costs.
Based on the preliminary construction cost estimate for this park, the Board of Directors
approved a preliminary fee credit of ~ 1,368,000 towards City Public Facilities Fees. Following
a final review and verification of all construction costs associated with the development of
this park, staff will be forwarding a consent item to the Board of Directors which will identify
the final credit amount to be received by Kemper for City Public Facilities Fees.
ATTACHMENTS:
Site/Location Map
Copy of Grant Deed
,v,.,., I
· ALLEY UNRE*LO ~l
H',~ ] CHRIS TI#N
H$
I
L%
/
Dd Sol Park"
$ SUNm
I"'-.
PALOMA DEL SOL PARK
Site/Location Map
1 EXEMPT RECORDING REQUESTED BY
City of Temecula
PER GOV'T CODE § 6103
AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
Office of the City Clerk
City of Temecula
43172 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
MAIL TAX STATEMENTS TO:
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE
GRANT DEED
The undersigned grantor declares:
FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged,
K/~DC, Inc., a CalifoTnia corporation
hereby grants to the CITY OF TEMECULA, a body corporate and politic, the following
described real property in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of
California:
See Exhibit "A" attached hereto.
Executed on October l lth , 19 93 , at Temecula
California.
(Signature) Csaba F. Ko, Vice PresidenE
~ (Title)
3;/letms/grBneeed 013192
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
On October 11, Z993 before me, the undersigned, A Notary Public in and for the State
of California, personally appeared Csaba :F. I(o , personally known to me
(or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s)
is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed
the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the
instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the
instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
r IIf ~
C .T.,A G.
~ My commission expires Oct. Z4. Zg~ ~
CONSENT
The City of Temecula hereby consents to the grant of real property set forth above.
City of Temecula
By:
J. Sal Mu~oz, Mayor
ATTEST:
By:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By: '
Scott F. Field, City Attorney
3~formNgranieed 013112 ~
LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR PARK SITE
THOSE PORTIONS OF CAMPANULAWAY, AND PARCELS 2 AND 3 OF PARCEL MAp
23432 RECORDED IN PARCEL MAP BOOK 159, PAGES 38 THROUGH 61
INCLUSIVE, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF RIVERSIDE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS.
COMMENCING AT A POINT AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE WESTERLY LINE OF
SAID PARCEL MAP NO. 23432, WITH THE CENTERLINE OF DE PORTOLAROAD,
SAID POINT BEING NORTH 73'26'04" EAST, 319.95 FEET FROM THE
INTERSECTION OF MARGARITA ROAD AND DE PORTOLAROAD AS SHOWN ON SAID
MAP, SAID POINT ALSO BEING THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE
NORTHWESTERLY AND RAVING A RADIUS OF 1,200.00 FEET;
THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CENTERLINE OF DE PORTOLA ROAD AND
SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 40'24'52", 846.44 FEET;
THENCE DEPARTING THE CENTERLINE OF DE PORTOLAROAD, SOUTH 56°58'48''
EAST, A DISTANCE OF 50.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHEASTERLY 100
FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID DE PORTOLA ROAD, 'SAID POINT BEING
THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHEASTERLY 100 FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE NORTH
33°01'12" EAST A DISTANCE OF 200.00 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A
CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY AND RAVING A RADIUS OF 1,150.00 FEET;
THENCE ALONG SAID CURVETHROUGH A CENTRALANGLE OF 01'28'23", 29.57
FEET;
THENCE DEPARTING SAID SOUTHEASTERLY 100 FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE,
SOUTH 51°41'43'' EAST, A DISTANCE OF 197.34 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 48°03'26"EAST, A DISTANCE OF 370.35 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 39°28'00'' WEST, A DISTANCE OF 733.15 FEET TO A POINT
ON A NON-TANGENT CURVE RAVING A RADIUS OF 950.00 FEET, TO WHICH A
RADIAL BEARS SOUTH 25°44'32'' WEST;
THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
31°40'28'', 525.18 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 32°35'00'' WEST, A DISTANCE OF 43.50 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 10°46'22'' EAST, A DISTANCE OF 31.58 FEET TO A POINT
ON A NON-TANGENT CURVE RAVING A RADIUS OF 1,250.00 FEET, TO WHICH
A RADIAL BEARS SOUTH 35'52'13" RAST, SAID POINT ALSO BEING ON SAID
SOUTHEASTERLY 100 FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF DE PORTOLA ROAD;
THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHEASTERLY 100 FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE,
NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
21°06'35", 460.54 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING-
LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR PARK SITE (CONT.)
CONTAINING 9.51 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
SUBJECT PARCEL INCLUDES PORTION OF "CAMPANULA WAY" AS SHOWN ON SAID
PARCEL MAP NO. 23432, WHICH IS TO BE "VACATED"
PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF:
JAMES A. DRENON, JR.
P.L.S. 6153
EXP. 3/31/94
-~'~'CA~ ;~
......
DATE
../-
Te4CT ~
//
ITEM
5
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY ~
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
Board of Directors
FROM:
David F. Dixon, City Manager
DATE:
January 11, 1994
SUBJECT:
Acceptance of the Quitclaim Deeds for the Parking Lot adjacent
to Kent Hintergardt Memorial Park.
PREPARED BY: (~ i~r Beryl Yasinosky, Management Assistant
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors:
Accept the quitclaim deeds from the Murdy Foundation and Kemper Community Development
Company for the parking lot adjacent to Kent Hintergardt Memorial Park.
BACKGROUND: On October 26, 1993, the Board of Directors approved the
acceptance of a grant deed from the Presley Companies for Kent Hintergardt Memorial Park,
a nine-acre community park within Tract No. 23267-2. However, the actual transfer of the
park to the City did not include the parking lot, which is a .26 acre portion of adjacent
property not owned by the developer.
The parking lot has been completed and quitclaim documents have since been obtained from
the Murdy Foundation and Kemper Community Development Company which transfer fee-title
interest and easement rights for this area to the City. The enclosed quitclaim documents have
been reviewed by staff to insure that all legal requirements have been satisfied. A policy of
title insurance has also been provided by the developer to accompany the transfer of title to
the City.
FISCAL IMPACT: The cost of maintaining the parking lot has beenincluded in the
TCSD FY 1993/94 budget for Community Services, Parks, and Recreation· The acquisition
costs of the parking lot were paid in full to the Murdy Foundation by the developer, the
Presley Companies.
ATTACHMENTS:
Vicinity/Location Map
Quitclaim Deed from the Murdy Foundation
Quitclaim (easement) Deed from KRDC, Inc.
R:;YeemOML~KH.Iq(I 1221R
EXEMPT RECORDING REQUESTED BY
City of Temecula
PER GOV'T CODE § 6103
AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
Office of the City Clerk
City of Temecula
431'74 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California 92590
Space above this line for recorder'$ use
QUITCLAIM DEED
FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged,
GEORGE E. TROTTERj AND MAXINE MURDY TROTTER,
Co-Trustees of the Trotter Trust, established May 6, 1974,
MAXINE MURDY TROTTER, Successor Trustee of the John A.
Murdy, III, Separate Property Trust, established February 10,
1976, and MURDY FOUNDATION, a California nonprofit
corporation,
do hereby REMISE, RELEASE AND FOREVER QUITCLAIM to
THE CITY OF TEMECULA, a body corporate and politic,
the following described real property in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of
California:
See EXHIBIT "A" attached hereto and by this reference made a
part hereof.
Dated:/D.-_'Tn- ~ ~
GEORGE E. TROTTER AND MAXINE MURDY
TROTTER, Co-Trustees of the Trotter Trust,
established May 6, 1974
~: _~_..~ ~ ~ ~~
MAXINE MURDY TRC~(~ER, Co-Trustee
1 O/13/93 - 1 -
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF ~
On /0-,20- ~:/
personally appeared
)
) ss.
)
· before
, Notary Public,
personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the
person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to
me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by
his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument, the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which
the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Signature
i~M ~)tA'!.d~99M12 ! 7 Zz
(Seal)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
0 n JO ~..~ ' ?3
personally appeared
)
) ss.
)
, before me,
Notary Public,
personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the
person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to
me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by
his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument, the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which
Signature
the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
~7
(Seal)
1 o/13/93 -3-
MAXINE MURDY TROTTER, Successor Trustee of
the John A. Murdy, III, Separate Property Trust,
established February 10, 1976
By:
R TT Successor Trustee
MURDY FOUNDATION, a California nonprofit
corporation
By:
Geo~e E. TrotterJ
CONSENT
The City of Temecula hereby consents to the quitclaim of real property set forth above.
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Ron Roberos, Mayor
ATTEST:
By:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By:
Scott F. Field, City Attorney
10/13/93 -2-
EXHIBIT "A" ""
THAT PORTION OF LITTT.~. TEMECULA RANCHO IN ~ CITY OF TEMECULA,
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN BY MAP ENTITE
"PARTITION MAP OF THE LITTLE TEMECqILA RANCBO", ON FILE IN ~
OFFICE OF ~ COUNTY CLERK OF THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, IN ACTION NO. 5756 IN ~ SUPER/OR COURT, OF SAID SAN
DIEGO COUNTY, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOr.TOWS:
BEGINNING AT AN A POINT ON THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF THAT PROPERTY
DESCIQTR~D IN DEED TO JOHN A. MURDY, JR. AND NORMAL. MURDY PER
INSTI~UMENT NO. 123991, RECORDED DECEMBER 30, 1966, O.R., IN THE
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID RIVERSIDE COUNTY, SAiD POINT
ALSO BEING THE MOST WESTERLY CORNER OF LOT 184 OF TRACT NO. 23267-2
AS RECORDED IN BOOK 237 PAGES 63 THROUGH 69 OF MAPS, OF SA/D
RIVERSIDE COUNTY, SAID POINT ALSO BEING ON ~ ARC OF A 1200.00
FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY, A RADIAL LINE TO SAID
POINT BEARS SOUTH 31o18'19- WEST; THENCE SOUTw~ASTERLY ALONG THE
ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 12°24 '51" A DISTANCE
OF 260.00 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE, RADI3~T.T.y,
SOUTH 18°53 '28'' WEST 40.00 FEET TO A POINT ON TWR. ARC OF A NON-
TANGENT 1240.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORT~-ASTERLY, A RADIAL
LINE TO SA/D POINT BEARS SOUTH 18 ° 53 ' 28" WEST; THENCE
NORTHWEST~y ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE
OF 14 ° 43 ' 20" A DISTANCE OF 3 18.62 FEET TO A POINT ON THE
SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF THAT EASEMENT GRANTED TO ~ CITY OF TEMECULA
PER INSTI~~ NO. 303462, RECORDED AUGUST 17, 1992, 0.R., IN THE
OFFICE 'OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID RIVERSIDE COUNTY, SA/D LINE
ALSO BEING THE ARC OF A NON-TANGENT 76.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE
NORTHERLY, A RADIAL LINE TO SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 17o57'26'' WEST;
T~'~NCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL
ANGT.~. OF 49 "16 ' 15" A DISTANCE OF 65.36 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
SAID PARC~r. CONTAINS 0.259 ACRES MORE OR LESS.
SEE EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED F;~ETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART
HEREOF.
14
/
/
/
(
VICINITY MAP
NO SCALE
531'lS'lq'WCl~)
OROBBT
M'IIAZ)
I
SCALE N r-2oo'
Engineers · Planners · Surveyors
M50 II Camla~ hi. Sglt~
~lrllbld, CeiUor,,I s 9~008
(exe) ~e -
184 .,~c3 N "~
05
II~OlCATES QUITCLAIM
DEED Ai;2EA
II~DICATES 44' ACCESS
~PEI~ INSTlaJvl~rr
NO. 123~91 I;~COI~DED
12-30-66, OJ~.
A POInTION Of= LITTLE TEtvECLLA
I~ANCI40 KNOWN AS PAi~TITION MAP
OF TIE 1,1TTLE T!SME~ I~ANCI,~'
ON FILE IN TIE CX=~ICE OF TIE
COLINI'Y CLEi~ OF TIE COLIVff OF
SAN DIEGO. STATE OF CALIF<XZNIA
IN ACTION NO. 5756 IN TIE
COLI~T OF SAID SAN DIEeO COLNT~.
F. XHIBr!'
EXEMPT RECORDING REQUESTED BY
City of Temecula
PER GOV'T CODE § 6103
AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
Office of the City Clerk
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
Space above this line for recorder's use
QUITCLAIM DEED
FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged,
KRDC, Inc., a Corporation, successor in interest to Rancho California, a
Partnership, composed of Kaiser Rancho California, a Inc., a Corporation;
Temecula Properties, Inc., a Corporation; and Temecula Investment
Company, a Corporation,
do hereby REMISE, RELEASE AND FOREVER QUITCLAIM to
THE CITY OF TEMECULA, a body corporate and politic,
the following described real property in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside,
State of California:
See EXHIBIT "A" attached hereto and by this
reference made a part hereof.
KRDC, Inc., a Corporation,
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
On October 14, 1993 before me, the undersigned, A Notary Public in and for the State
of California, personally appeared Sr~razt C. Noreen , personally known to me
(or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s)
is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed
the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the
instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the
instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
CYNTHIA G. ZAJD
Notary PuDlic California
CONSENT
The City of Temecula hereby consents to the grant of real property set forth above.
ATTEST:
City of Temecula
By:
Ron Roberos, Mayor
By:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By: ~ ~
F F
Scott . ield, Attorney
3clferrn$/grBndeed 013192
EXE/BIT "A"
THAT PORTION OF LITTLE TEMECULA RANCHO IN ~ CITY OF TEMECULA,
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN BY MAP ENTITLED
"PARTITION MAP OF THE .LITTLE TEMECULA RANCliO", ON FILE IN Th'R
OFFICE OF ~ COUNTY CLERK OF THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, IN ACTION NO. 5756 IN ~ SUPERIOR COURT, OF SAID SAN
DIEGO COUNTY, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOTx<3WS:
BEGINNING AT AN A POINT ON THE NORTHEASTERLY Ia2rE OF THAT PROPERTY
DESCRIBED IN DEED TO JOHN A. MURDY, JR. AND NORMAL. MURDY PER
INSTRUM]~-NT NO. 123991, RECORDED DECEMBER 30, 1966, O.R., IN THE
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SA/D RIVERSIDE COUNTY, SA/D POINT
ALSO BEING TEE MOST WESTERLY CORNER OF LOT 184 OF TRACT NO. 23267-2
AS RECORDED IN BOOK 237 PAGES 63 THROUGH 69 OF MAPS, OF SAID
R/VERSIDE COUNTY, SAID POINT ALSO BEING ON ~ ARC OF A 1200.00
FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY, A RADIAL L/NE TO SAID
POINT BEARS SOUTH 31°18'19'' WEST; TTtENCE SOUT;r~-ASTERLY ALONG THE
ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 12°24 '51" A DISTANCE
OF 260.00 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE, RADLAT.T.y,
soErlvJ~ 18o53,28,, WEST 40.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE ARC OF A NON-
TANGENT 1240.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTw~.ASTERLY, A RADIAL
LINE TO SA/_D POINT BEARS SOUTH 18 ° 53 ' 28" WEST; THENCE
NORTHWESTERLy ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE
~OF 14 o 43 · 20" A DISTANCE OF 3 18.62 FEET TO A POINT ON THE
]OUTHWESTERLy LINE OF THAT EASEMENT GRANTED TO ~ CITY OF TEMECULA
PER INSTRUMENT NO. 303462, RECORDED AUGUST 17, 1992, 0.R., IN THE
OFFICE'OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID RIVERSIDE COUNTY, SAID LINE
ALSO BEING THE ARC OF A NON-TANGENT 76.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE
NORTHERLY, A RADIAL LINE TO SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 17~57'26,, WEST;
THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL
ANGT.~. OF 49 o 16 ' 15" A DISTANCE OF 65.36 F~TRT TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
SAID PARCRT. CONTAINS 0.259 ACRES MORE OR LESS.
SEE EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART
FRREOF.
"' No. .aSg4 ""
14
531'la'lq'WC:R.)
184
0
·
NO SCALE
/,q
I
N r-=oo'
,'BOBBY
,fBAD
tINTOIl
hEineera · Planners. S,irveyora
88Bo El Carolrio hal. Suite 200
(8lO) 436 - i210
II',DICAT'c,S 4.4' ACCESS
EASISMENT PEi; INS~
NO. 123991 I;ECO;DED
12-~D-66, O.I;.
^OC'4P"88 ~
A POiZTION Oft LITTLE TEiVlECLLA
I~ KNOWN AS PARTITION MAP
OI= T1-E 'LITTLE TEIVLR::::I.I.A I;ANCI-IO'
ON I=ILE IN TIE CR=ICE OF TI-.E
SAN DIEQO. STATE Of= CALIF'tDliNIA
IN ACTION NO. 5756 IN TIE ,.qUPEi;ICE
CC)LEI' OP SAID SAN DEGO COt. NTY'.
ITEM NO.
APPROVA~~
CITY ATTORNE
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGE
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
Community Services Board of Directors
FROM:
David F. Dixon, General Manager
DATE:
January 11, 1994
SUBJECT:
Completion and Acceptance of the Riverton Park Improvements
Project No, PVV93-04CSD
PREPARED BY:
Shawn D. Nelson, Director of Community Services
Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer -Capital Projects
RECOMMENDATION:
1. That the Board of Directors direct the City Clerk to:
a. File the Notice of Completion end release the Performance Bond.
be
Accept a one (1) year Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract
value upon acceptance of the improvements.
Ce
Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after acceptance of the
improvements if no liens have been filed to that date.
That the Board of Directors authorize the Director of Community Services to accept
the park site improvements upon completion of the maintenance period.
BACKGROUND:
On August 10, 1993, the City Council awarded a contract for the Riverton Park Improvements
to Cunningham Davis Corp. in the amount of $312,000.00. The Contractor has completed
constructing the park site improvements as specified in the construction contract. The work
completed includes grading, construction of a decorative fence, sidewalk and an ornamental
shade structure, installation of an automatic irrigation system, landscaping, and multicolored
playground equipment.
All the improvements were constructed in accordance with the approved plans and
specifications within the allotted contract time to the satisfaction of the Director of
Community Services. The construction retention for this project will be released thirty five
(35) days after the Notice of Completion has been filed.
pw13%egdrpt%94%0111%pw93-O4.eoo 1227
The improvement plans and specifications require that the contractor maintain the park site
improvements for 120 calendar days prior to acceptance by the Director of Community
Services. At the end of the 120 days, the project will be accepted or the maintenance period
will be extended until such time that the maintenance period specifications have been met.
A warranty period commences on the day the Notice of Completion is recorded. Two (2%)
percent of the contract award price is retained during this period. Should the contractor
default on his maintenance responsibilities, the Warranty Retention will protect Community
Services from any maintenance costs incurred prior to acceptance of the improvements.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The contract amount for this project was $312,000 plus a contingency amount of $31,200.
Two contract change orders have been approved for an amount of $11,31 1.76, bringing the
total contract amount to $323,311.76. The project was constructed within the combined
contract and contingency amount of $343,200.00. Funds for this project were allocated from
Development Impact Fees.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Notice of Completion
2. Maintenance Bond
pw13%egdrpt~4%0111~w93-O4.ecc 1227
RECORDING REQUEb I rd,; BY
AND RETURN TO:
CrrYCLERK
crrY OF TEMECULA
43174 imkmee Perk Drive
Temeoula, CA 92690
IPACE ABOVE THli UNE FOIl
RECORDER'I U~E
NOTICE OF COMPLETION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT:
1. The City of Temecula is the owner of the property hereinafter described.
2. The full address of the City of Temecula is 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula,
California 92590.
3. A Contract was awarded by the City of Temecula to CUNNINGHAM DAVIS CORP. to
perform the following work of improvement: PW93-04CSD RIVERTON PARK.
4. Said work was completed by said company according to plans and specifmations and
to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works of the City of Temecula and that Mid work was
accepted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on January 11,
1994. That upon said contract the DEVELOPERS INSURANCE COMPANY was surety for the bond
given by the said company as required by law.
5. The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the City of
Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, and is described as follows:
PROJECT PW93-04CSD.
6. The street address of said property is: 30950 RIVERTON LANE.
Dated at Temecula, California, this _ day of
· 1994.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
CITY OF TEMECULA
Ss
JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California and do hereby certify under penalty of
perjury, that the foregoing NOTICE OF COMPLETION is True and correct, and that said NOTICE OF
COMPLETION was duly and regularly ordered to be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder of
Riverside by said City Council.
Dated at Temecula, California, this day of
· 1994.
JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk
Foma/C]~-001 itev. 12-5J)1 pwl 3~lp%projecte%pw93-O4.esd%oompletn.not 011194
CITY OF. TEME~LA, PUBUC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MAINTIdANCE BOND
PROJE~ NO. PWSS-G405D BOND
P. 2'3
NO: 144632P
KNOW ALL MEN BY THinE PRESENI'~ THAT:
ClRININGHAM-DAVIS CORP,11062 MULBERRY AVE,. FONTANA CA 92335
CORPORATION
a, ' , hereinsfra,' Galled Princai:k~, and
DEVELOPERS INSURANCE COMPANY, 1425 W FOOTHILL BLVD STE 120, UPLAND CA 91786
hereirmft~ called SURE'I'Y, are held end firmly laund umo CITY OF T~':MECULA,
hetlneflaroakdOWNEFl, inU~elar~lsum of ~-~TR.'~ O~S ~OUSAND
~T])~]) ~OL~S ~ HO CRNTS******************~OLL,MIS ~ O0/00'*************
CBITI i$. 31,900..00,**********) in bwfui mon6y of ~he I. tn~8;[ STaTes, f~ U~e ;aymem of
wha(~ sum weal and mjly to be msde, we bind ourselves. --".r-riemx's and assigns. joindy and
18VIfldy, firmly by ~'iese pritllhl3,. '
THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION is such that wbefeNl, lhe Principal entered into a oarman
ConicaCt with the OWNER, dated the 10TH dRIP Of AUGUST ., 1t 93. a oopV of wlti;h il
harm ~ and m~iKie a par~ hereof for the constrUot~ Of PROJECT NO. PWg34344:JSD.
WIIBTiAS, said Contract provides thut the Principal wgl furrdsh s bond condidoned to guNantee
fe the WIoU of ~}De year sfte approval of the firel estimate on ui(f Job, by the OWNER, against
all de~ects In workmenshiD and materials which may become al>lamnz dudnO aid period: end
WHEREAS, the said Contract has been completed, and was approved on 12-9
19, 93.
NOW, THEREFORIS, THE CONINTJON OF TH!8 OBLIGATION 18 SUCH, that if wtth[n one year from
the dam of approval of the sold Contract, the work done tmcJer the tern of Hid Contract shag
dispose poor w0rkmanehip i~ the exaction of sniff work, and the carrying out of the terms of seed
Contract, or it shmU appear that defective matedais were furnished thereunder, than This obligation
shall remain in full force and virtue, otherwise this instrument ehall be void,
i)ECEHBER
· · ¶9 93 .
P.3.,,;3
8A~%EF~ DE1~LOPERS INSURANCE COMPANY
R.E. GAIL
ATTOR~EY- IN-FACT
APPROVED al~ TO FORM:
PR~aC~PAL CUNNINGHAM-DAVIS CORP
ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SURETY (ATTORNEY-IN-FACT)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
SSe
On 12-7-93 , before me SANDRA J. COOLEY, personally
appeared R.E. GAIL personally known to me to be the person
whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged to me that he executed the same in his
authorized capacity, and that by his signature on the
instrument the person, or the entity upon behalf of which the
person acted, executed the instrument.
Witness my hand and off~~~~.e~l. ~/~
<j'~j,"Z* ,"~' '~'~..?=" ;l,\ ;,' "UP*.:: CALiFOrNIA
,~ ", ';.,, ~;:;: :' 2' '.:~ ."':- ~; ~.c;~.'o cou,,nv NO O f i f O rn i a
/ ","_. c::._i.::" :.:r ,.cram ~'3. rc3 f.'.at. ;9. 1995 )'
POWER OF ATTORNEY OF
INDEMNITY COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA
AND DEVELOPERS INSURANCE COMPANY NO 177654
P.O. BOX 19725, IRVINE, CA 92713 · (714) 263-3300
I~E: 1. A~~p~w~r~n~euth~r~tyhereingr~n~ed~ha~~~n~ny~ventterm~n~te~nthe31~td~yofM~rch~1~~6~
2. This Power Of Attorney is void if litere(! or ff any doraon is erased.
3. This Power of Attorney is void unless the seal is readable, the text is in brown ink, the SigrmNres ere in blue ink end this notice is in red ink.
4. This Power of Attorney should not be refused to fie Attorney(s)-In-Flct, but Should remain a barmanera lad of the obligee's records.
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that, except ILl expressly ~nited, INDEMNITY COMPANY OF CALFORNIA and DEVILOIItRI INIURAIICE COMPANY, de each
severefly, but not jointly, hereby rake, constitute and appoint
***Judith K. Austin, John C. Austin, R. E. Gail., jointly or severally***
the true and lawful Attorney(s)-In-Fsct, to rake, execute, clsiiver and acknowledge, for and on behalf of each of aid C~;~oralions sl Sureties, bond~ undertakings and corereels of
Suretyship in In amount not exceeding Two MHlion Five Hundred Thousand Doilrs ($2,500,000) in any Single undMllking; giving and glinting Unto laid Attorney(iNn-Fact full
power end luJthorlty to do and to perform every act nacelsery, requishe or prow to be done in connection therewith u ~ of elm corporations could do, IxJt reserving to eec~ Of
Slid COrporations full Ixa~r of substitution and revocltion; and all of the Ictl Of Slid Attor~s)-In-FIct, purllant to thele pillstill, are hereby rltlfie(I and cofifirmed.
The authority and powers COnferred by this Power of Attorney do not extend to any Of the following bondl, underlakinOI or contractl of Suretyship:
Bank depository bonds, mortgage deficiency bonds, mow guarantee bends, guarantees Of instellment paper, note guarantee bonds, ben¢is on tinanal inxttfuttofis, lease
bonds. insurance COmpany qualifying bonds, Nff-insurer'a bonds, tidalsly bonds or bail bonds.
This Power Of Attorney is granted and is signed by facsimile under and by authority Of the following rceolutidns adopted by the respective Boards Of Directors of INDgMNITY
COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA and DEVELOKelll INIURANCE COMPANY, effective iS Of Sepfofnlar 24, 1986:
RESOLVED, that the Chairman of the Board, the President and any Vice Presides of the cprt,~oretion be, and that each of them hereby is. authorized to execute Powers of Attorney,
qual~fying the ~tt~rney(s) named in the P~wers of Attorney to ex8cute~ ~n ~3ehalf of the m~ b~nd8~ undee1king~ and c~ntracts of Suretyship; ~nd that the Secretery of any i
ant Sacdry of the COrborstion be, and each of them hereby is, 8uthorizad to liteat the execueon of any Such Power of Attorney;
RESOLVED. FURTHER, that the signatures of such offider8 may be affixed to any Such Power of Attorney Or to any certfficate tainting thereto by facsimile, and any such Power of
Attorney or certificate bearing such facsimile signaloral shah be vsiid and binding upon the carporation when Io offixed and ifi the future wtth rN;act to any bond, undertoking of
COntract of Suretyship to which it is ached.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, INDEMNITY COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA and DEVELOPERS INIURANCE COMPANY have leverlily caused these prslents to be igned by their rsq)ac-
tlve President8 and attested by their relpectlve Secretaries this lit day of April, 1993.
INDEMNfT'Y COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA DEVELOPL~I INBUBANCE COMPANY
~I F. Vista, Jr, ~ ~n ) F. Vim Jr.
r P~idem · ~
A~EST A~T
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) SS.
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
On Aprtl 1, 1993, before me, Tirela Tlafua, personally appeared Dante F. VancentS, Jr, and Walter Crowell, bersonlHy known to me (os: provided to me on the bllil of v Ikfk I}ry
evidence) to be the lamon(s) whose name(s) is/am lubscrlbed to the within instrument and ecknowtedged to me thm hellhe/they executed the Same in his/herltheh' muGHxlzld
cepacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) On me instrument the person(s), or the entity udon bahaft Of which the penoNe) acted, executed the inmrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Signature
JellellllllellellSllllllllS'lll~41':lJljl~lll~
CERTIfiCATE
- The undersigned, as Senior Vice President of INDEMNITY COMPANY OF CAUFORNIA, end Senior Vice Prlident of DEVILOF!If8 INIUNANCE COMPANY, doel hltllby
certify thm me foregoing and attached Power of Attorney remains in full force and hal not been revoked; end turthermore, thlt the provisions of the relotutfonl of the relpleifve
Boards of Directors of Slid cofp(xltions let forth in the Power of Attorney, are in force as of the date Of this Certlftcme.
This Certlticato is executed in the City of Irvina, California, this 7TT~ dly o/ ]:)17'C]gI~F"R - 199 3
INITY COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA ~ DEVILOPIRI INIIRIANCE COMPANLF?r~,~~~
By ~'~ By ,
* .5. Fiobiger
Senior Vice President Senior VICe PrelMe~t
ID-310 REV. 4/93
ITEM
NO.
7
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
Community Services Board of Directors
David F. Dixon· General Manager
January 11, 1993
Amendment No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement for a Project
Coordinator During Construction of the Community Recreation Center
Project No. PW92-O29B
PREPARED BY:
Shawn D Nelson Diirector of Communiity Services
Don Spa;nolo Pr;nc pal Engineer Cap tel Projects
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Board of Directors approve Amendment No. 2, extending the Professional Services
Agreement for a Project Coordinator during construction of the Community Recreation Center,
Project No. PW92-29B in an amount not to exceed $10,240.00.
DISCUSSION:
On March 24, 1993 the City entered into an agreement with Steven J. Ford to provide
Professional Services as a Project Coordinator for construction of the Community Recreation
Center. An amendment to the agreement was approved for additional compensation for
extending the constructing time by 23 days which was granted the contractor, T.B. Penick
& Sons, Inc. for changes to the work being performed. The revised construction schedule
requires that the services of the Project Coordinator be extended an estimated 32 days in
order to provide complete services through to the end of the project. The scope of services
as listed in exhibit "A" of the Agreement will remain unchanged. Amendment No. 2 to the
Agreement will result in an increase to the contract in an amount not to exceed $10,240.00
pw13%agdrpt%94%0122%frdemend.no2 1229
FISCAL IMPACT:
The original contract amount was for ~52,800.00. Amendment No. I to the Agreement
increased the original contract amount $5,280.00. The adjusted contract amount is
$58,080.00. Amendment No. 2 to the Agreement will increase the contract by an amount not
to exceed $10,240.00 for a total contract amount of $68,320.00. Funds for Amendment No.
2 are available from TCSD bond proceeds in Account No. 250-190-129-5804.
ATTACHMErITS:
1. Amendment No. 2
pwl 3~agdrpt%94%0122%frdemend.no2 1229
AM~-NDlVn=~NT NO. 2
STBVEN J. FORD
CRC PROIF, CT COORDINATOR
PURCHASE ORDER NO. 13849
The A~'eement dated March 24, 1993 between the City of Temecula, and Steven J. Ford (herein
referred to as * AZreement*) is hereby mended as follows:
Professional Servi~ for the Community Recreation Center
RB: Project Coordination Services
Community Recreation Center
Section 1
I. The scope of services as listed in exhibit 'A' of the 'AZreement' will remain unchanZed.
The need for an additional 32 working days for the project requires that the services of
the Project Coordinator be extended during this period.
Section 2
Compensation for services shall be total of all savi~ described in this Amendment and shall
not exceed Ten Thousand Two Hundred and Forty Dollars ($10,240.00).
All above costs are eliZible for fundinE thwugh Temecula Community Services District bond
proceeds. The total cost of this element of the project is summarized below:
Original Contract Amount
Adjusted Contract Amount
Proposed Amendment No. 2
Total Contract Amount
$ 52,800.00
$ 58,080.00
$ 10,240.00
$ 68.320.00
pw131agdrpfi94~O122%frdenend.no2 1229
Section 3
All other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain the same.
The parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date and year above written.
By' -~ By:
&,/,Steven/~. Ford
CITY OF TEIVIECULA
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Scott F. Field, City Attorney
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
ITEM NO.
8
APPROVAl
CITY ATTORNEY ~
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
Community Services Board of Directors
FROM:
David F. Dixon, General Manager
DATE:
January 11, 1994
SUBJECT:
Contract Change Orders No. 10 through No. 11
Community Recreation Center - Phase II
Project No. PW92-29B
PREPARED BY:
(~3(-Shawn D. Nelson, Director of Community Services
Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer- Capital Projects
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Board of Directors approve Contract Change Orders No. 10 and No. 11 for the
Community Recreation Center - Phase II, Project No. PW92-29B, for labor, material, and
equipment in the amount of $34,519.14.
BACKGROUND:
During the construction of the Community Recreation Center the following items of work have
resulted in a change to the contract:
CHANGE ORDER NO. 10
Demo Curb. Ramo. and Asohalt: Modify curb and gutter, access ramps, and sidewalk
to meet American Disabilities Act (ADA) Handicapped Requirements. The locations are
at the NE corner of the gym and perking lot, the upper walkway from the perking lot
to the gym, and the westerly corner of the electric room and gym for entry into the
swimming pool area. The modification requires demolition of two areas and the
addition of concrete walkways, steps and access ramps.
Footing for Light Standard: Relocate one light so that a walkway can be added at the
NE corner of the gym to provide access to the parking lot. The construction change is
required to meet ADA requirements.
Additional Area Drains: Add three landscape drains to remove water away from
building areas. The locations are at the NE corner of the gym, the landscape wall
fronting the gym, and the sidewalk paving at the gallery entry.
pwl 3%egdrpt%94%0111%pw92-29b 123093
4. Asphalt Patch: Patch asphalt where curb and sidewalk was removed and/or
reconstructed to meet ADA requirements.
SUBTOTAL: $13,246.55
An estimated $5,000.00 will be deducted from the architect's last progress payment to
reimburse the City for the design modifications needed to meet ADA Handicap Requirements.
CHANGE ORDER NO, 11
10.
Area Drains: To eliminate ponding, install an additional area drains at the chemical
storage facility, the planter adjacent to the access ramp at the NW corner of the
electrical room, and at the concrete sidewalk adjacent to the pool equipment room.
Proiection Screen: Install conduit and wiring as needed to supply power to the
projection screen located in the stage area·
Monument Sign: Modify the monument sign located at the main entrance to
incorporate the change in name from "Rancho California Sports Park" to "Temecula
Community Recreation Center·"
Bracket SUPPOrtS: Install brackets to provide structural support for the counters at the
swimming pool and ampithaater pass through windows and the decorative lights at the
main entrance.
Backwash Tank: Install conduit, wiring, and service connections as needed to supply
power to the pump attached to the backwash tank.
Tile in Kitchen: Sat tile within the mop basin and extend the tile to a height of 8' in
the kitchen to meet Health Department requirements.
Roll Up Door: Install additional slats to properly seal the roll up door for the
ampitheater.
HVAC System: Modify the HVAC system within the Director's office, because of
construction constraints caused by the fire protection system and the height of the
ceiling.
Test Box: Install a test box in the plaza concrete outside of the kitchen to satisfy
Eastern Municipal Water District requirements.
Additional Conduit: Install additional conduit under the driveway approach and from
the audio-visual room at the ampitheater to the computer room by the gymnasium to
allow for future cable and electrical service.
SUBTOTAL: $21,272.59
TOTAL: $34.519.14
pw13~gdrpt~94~0111%pw92-29b 123093
FISCAL IMPACT:
The original contract was awarded in the amount of $4,196,400.00. Contract Change Orders
No.1 through No. 9 were approved for a total amount of $101,745.86. Contract Change
Orders No. 10 and 11 will increase the adjusted contract by an amount not to exceed
834,519.14. This increase will exceed the 88,254. 14 remaining in the approved contingency
amount of $110,000.00 by $26,265.00. The total adjusted contract amount for the project
is $4,332,665.00.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Contract Change Order No. 10
2. Contract Change Order No. 11
pw13~mgdq~t~94%0111%pw92-29b 123093
/
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive · Temecula, California 92590
(9091 694-1989 · FAX (909) 694-'
CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 10
CONTRACT NO. PW92-29B
PROJECT:
Community Recreation Center - Phase II
SHEET 1 of _Z_
TO CONTRACTOR: T, P, Penick & Sons, Inc,
NOTE:
This change order is not effective until aDoroved by the Engineer.
THIS CHANGE PROVIDES FOR:
An INCREASE in the following items:
Demo Curb. Ramo. and Asohalt: Modify curb and gutter, access ramps, and sidewalk
to meet American Disabilities Act (ADA) Handicapped Requirements. The locations are
at the NE corner of the gym and parking lot, the upper walkway from the parking lot
to the gym, and the westerly corner of the electric room and gym for entry into the
swimming pool area. The modification requires demolition of two areas and the
addition of concrete walkways, steps and access ramps.
Footina for Light Standard: Relocate one light so that a walkway can be added at the
NE corner of the gym to provide access to the parking lot. The construction change is
required to meet ADA requirements.
Additional Area Drains: Add three landscape drains to remove water away from
building areas. The locations are at the NE corner of the gym, the landscape wall
fronting the gym, and the sidewalk paving at the gallery entry.
e
Asphalt Patch: Patch asphalt where curb and sidewalk was removed and/or
reconstructed to meet ADA requirements.
TOTAL:S13,246.55
Original Contract Amount ................................. S4,196,400.00
Adjusted Contract Amount ................................. e4,298,145.86
Change Order No. 09 .--. ................................... $ 13,246.55
Total Contract Amount .................................... e4,311,392.~. 1
Adjustment of Working Days .................................
Approved: Principal enar. By:
CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 10
CONTRACT NO. PW92-29B
SHEET 2 of 2
We the undersigned contractor have given careful consideration to the change proposed and
hereby agree. If this proposal is approved, that we will provide all equipment, furnish all
materials, except as may otherwise be noted above, and perform all services necessary for
the work.
Date Acoe.ted: /' 3'
By: ~~s~ ure~~'L'
t
Name: 7/~_Y'7/~
(print)
Contractor: ~ ~ ~,~
(company's name)
Title: ~ ~/~
If the contractor does not sign acceptance of this order, his attention is directed to the
requirements of the specifications as to proceeding with the ordered work and filing a written
protest within the time therein specified.
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive · Temecula, California 92590
(909) 694-1989 · FAX (909) 694-1
CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 11
CONTRACT NO. PW92-29B
PROJECT:
Communltv Recreation Center - Phase II
SHEET _!.. of 2
TO CONTRACTOR: T. P. Penick & Sons, Inc.
NOTE:
This chanOe order is not effective until aDoroved by the Engineer.
THIS CHANGE PROVIDES FOR:
An INCREASE in the following items:
Area Drains: To eliminate ponding, install an additional area drains at the chemical
storage facility, the planter adjacent to the access ramp at the NW corner of the
electrical room, and at the concrete sidewalk adjacent to the pool equipment room.
Projection Screen: Install conduit and wiring as needed to supply power to the
projection screen located in the stage area.
Monument Sion: Modify the monument sign located at the main entrance to
incorporate the change in name from "Rancho California Sports Park" to "Temecula
Community Recreation Center."
Bracket SuPPOrtS; Install brackets to provide structural support for the counters at the
swimming pool and ampitheater pass through windows and the decorative lights at the
main entrance,
Backwash Tank: Install conduit, wiring, and service connections as needed to supply
power to the pump attached to the backwash tank.
Tile in Kitchen: Set tile within the mop basin and extend the tile to a height of 8' in
the kitchen to meet Health Department requirements.
Roll Uo Door: Install additional slats to properly seal the roll up door which was
incorrectly sized in the specifications.
HVAC System: Modify the HVAC system within the Director's office, because of
construction constraints caused by the fire protection system and the height of the
ceiling.
Test Box: Install a test box in the plaza concrete outside of the kitchen to satisfy
Eastern Municipal Water District requirements.
pwD~p~z~cts~nv92-2gV;c~c~o. ll 12.:0)3
CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 11
CONTRACT NO. PW92-29B
SHEET 2 of 2
10.
Additional Conduit: Install additional conduit under the driveway approach and from
the audio-visual room at the ampitheater to the computer room by the gymnasium to
allow for future cable and electrical service.
TOTAL: $21,272.59
Original Contract Amount ................................. 14, 196,400.00
Adjusted Contract Amount ................................. 14,311,392.41
Change Order No. 09 ..................................... $ 21,272.59
Total Contract Amount .................................... 14,332,665.00
Adjustment of Working Days .................................
Approved: Principal Engr. By: ~~j"'/" Date:
We the undersigned contractor have given careful consideration to the change proposed and
hereby agree. If this proposal is approved, that we will provide all equipment, furnish all
materials, except as may otherwise be noted above, and perform all services necessary for
the work.
Date Accepted: /"
/~~(signature)
Name: //~///i~7 //~'~'-/'/
(print)
(company's name)
Title: ~/ /~1~0~C'~
If the contractor does not sign acceptance of this order, his attention is directed to the
requirements of the specifications as to proceeding with the ordered work and filing a written
protest within the time therein specified.
REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY
ITEM
1
MINUTES OF A SPECIAL MEETING
OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 30, 1993
A special meeting of the City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency was called to order on
Tuesday, November 30, 1993, 6:40 P.M., at the Murrieta City Hall Council Chambers, 26442
Beckman Court, Murrieta. Chairperson Ronald J. Parks presiding.
PRESENT: 4
ABSENT: I
AGENCY MEMBERS:
AGENCY MEMBERS:
Muf~oz, Roberts, Stone, Parks
Birdsall
Also present were City Manager David F. Dixon, AssiBm City Manager Woody Edvalson, and
City Clerk June S. Greek.
PUBLIC COMM;NT
None
AGENCY BUSINFSS
Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of November 9, 1993;
1.2 Approve the minutes of November 23, 1993.
It was moved by Agency Member Stone, seconded by Agency Member Roberrs to
approve the staff recommendation.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 4 AGENCY MEMBERS: Muf~oz, Roberts, Stone, Parks
NOES: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: I AGENCY MEMBERS: Birdsall
FXFCUTIVE DIR;CTOR'S REPORT
None
RDAMIN11130/93 -1 - 1 W10/93
RFDEVFLOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES NOV;MB;R 30, 1993
AGENCY MEMBER'S REPORTS
Agency Member Muf~oz asked for a status update on the negotiations concerning the
judgement in Dawes vs the City of Temecula.
City Manager David Dixon advised the agency that the attorney for both parties have met end
reached agreement and a request for concurrent from the County should be presented to the
County in early January.
ADJOURNMFNT
It was moved by Agency Member Robarts, seconded by Agency Member Stone to adjourn at
6:50 P.M. The motion was unanimously carried with Agency Member Birdsall absent.
The next regular meeting of the Temecula Redevelopment Agency will be held on Tuesday,
December 14, 1993, 8:00 P.M., at the Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street,
Temecula, California.
ATTEST:
Chairperson Ronald J. Parks
June S. Greek, City Clerk
RDAMIN 11130/93 -2- 1 )./10/93
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING
HELD DECEMBER 14, 1993
A regular meeting of the Temecuie Community Services District was called to order at 8:50
PM, 22816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California. Chairperson Ronald J. Parks presiding.
PRESENT: 5 DIRECTORS: Birdsell, Mu~oz, Roberrs, Stone, Parks
ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None
Also present were General Manager David F. Dixon, City Attorney Scott F. Field and Agency
Secretary June S. Greek.
PUBLIC COMMENT
None given.
AGENCY BUSINESS
I Election of Chairperson
It was moved by Agency Member Birdsall, seconded by Agency Member Stone to
nominate Ronald J. Parks to serve as Chairperson of the Redevelopment Agency until
the end of calendar year 1994. The motion was unanimously carried.
2 Election of Vice Chairoerson
It was moved by Agency Member Robarts, seconded by Agency Member Stone to
nominate Agency Member Mufioz as Vice Chairperson who will assume the duties of
the Chairperson in his absence until the end of calendar year 1994. The motion was
unanimously carried.
3 Combining Balance Sheet as of Scotember 30. 1993 and Statement of Revenues.
Expenditures and Chan0es in Fund Balance for the Three Months Fnded Seotember 30.
1993
It was moved by Agency Member Stone, seconded by Agency Member Birdsell to
approve staff recommendation as follows:
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Receive end file the Combining Balance Sheet as of September 30,
1993 and the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in
Fund Balance for the Three Months Ended September 30, 1993.
The motion was unanimously carried.
4~])kli~12149~ -1- 01/0~94
Temecula Redevelopmerit Aeen~y M'nrates . December 14. 1993
RECESS
Chairperson Parks called a recess at 8:52 PM.
Chairperson Parks reopened the RDA Meeting at 12:10 AM. City Attorney Field announced
that the public hearings by the City Council and Redevelopment Agency would be heard
currently.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
4
Disoosition and nevelooment Agreement. Prooertv Exchanae and I ease Aoreement by
and between the Redevelooment Anencv of the City of Temecula and the Donna L.
Reeves Trust UTD 7-~5-90 for the Properties Located at ~7500 Jefferson Road and
26744 Ynez Road
City Attorney Field presented the joint staff reports. He announced that in addition to
the staff report, discussions were entertained to enter into an option agreement which
would allow Reeves to repurchase the Jefferson Road property at 82 million dollars for
up to 60 days prior to expiration of 12 months. He explained that during a 10 month
period, the City would have the ability to market the site, with Reeves having the right
of first refusal.
Chairperson Parks opened the public hearing at 12:17 AM.
Mr. Aaron Jacoby, 355 S. Grand Avenue, 31st Floor, Los Angeles, representing the
Reeves Group, stated the additional agreement allows the Reeves Group to help the
City find a buyer. He stated this action will allow for expansion of sales capability to
approximately 250-300 cars per month.
Dave Kennedy, applicant, stated the business function will be moved to the Ynez Site,
and the Company goal is to get the full operation moved as soon as possible.
Chairperson Parks closed the public hearing at 12:25 AM.
It was moved by Agency Member Stone, seconded by Agency Member Robarts to
approve staff recommendation as follows:
4.1
Approve the Resolution approving the Disposition and Development
Agreement, the § 031 Exchange Agreement, the Lease Agreement
between the Agency and Reeves regarding the properties located at
27500 Jefferson Road and 26755 Ynez Road, subject to approval by
the General Counsel as to the final form of the Agreements.
The motion was unanimously carried.
4LIIgA)iI~I21493 -2- 01/N/94
Temecula Redeveklpment AgenCy Minutes
l'~s~-mbe~ 14. 1993
5
Use of RedeveloDment Bond Proceeds for Construction of City Administrative Offices
and Corporate Yard
City Attorney Field presented the joint staff report.
Chairperson Parks opened the public hearing at 12:35 AM.
Pat Keller, P.O. Box 521, Temecula, addressed the Council and Agency in Opposition
to the use of Redevelopment Funds for construction of a City Administrative Center.
Steve Taploy, 43939 Margarita Road, spoke in opposition to the use of RDA funds for
construction of a City Hall. He also stated he distributed a letter concerning the lease
payments the City pays for its current facility and would like the figures reported in the
press corrected for the record.
Howard Omdahl, 45850 Via Vaquero Road, addressed the Council and Agency stating
the Bank of America location is not the proper location for City Hall, and suggested the
Crystal Ridge location, which he represents, would be a much better location for this
facility.
City Manager Dixon explained that. what is before the Council and Agency is not
acquisition or acceptance of a site, but merely financing in the event that this site is
chosen for construction of a facility.
Chairman Parks closed the public hearing at 12:50 AM.
It was moved by Agency Member Parks, seconded by Agency Member Stone to
approve staff recommendation with an amendment to the resolution title and Section
2 changing the appropriation to $4,000,000.00.
5.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 93-05
A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROPRIATING $4 MILLION DOLLARS FROM THE SERIES 1993
TAX ALLOCATION BONDS TO BE USED FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF CITY
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES AND A CORPORATION YARD NORTH OF
WINCHESTER ROAD AND WEST OF DIAZ ROAD
The motion was unanimously carried.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
None given.
4XRDA]iffiI21493
Temecula Redevelilgment A~ency Minutes December 14. 1993
AGENCY MEMBER'S REPORTS
None given.
ADJOURNMENT
Chairperson Parks adjourned the Redevelopment Meeting at 12:55 AM to s meeting on
January 11, 1994, 8:00 PM, Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula,
California.
Ronald J. Parks, Chairperson
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk/Agency Secretary
4~DAliN~I21493 4- 01/0al/94