HomeMy WebLinkAbout060893 CC AgendaAGENDA
TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
A REGULAR MEETING
TEMECULA COMMUNITY CENTER - 28816 PUJOL STREET
JUNE 8, 1993 - 7:00 PM
At approximately 9:45 PM, the City Council will
determine which of the remaining agenda items
can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00
PM and may continue all other items on which
additional time is required until a future meeting.
All meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 PM
EXECUTIVE SESSION: 5~3:o":Closed seUio. of the City Council acting as the Redevel!ii!:!i;
:opment AgenCy PurSuant to Govt. Code Sections 54956.8 regarding real property
acquisition, 54957.6 regarding labor negotiations and salary and fringe benefits.:
Next in Order:
CALL TO ORDER:
Invocation
Flag Salute
Ordinance: No. 93-13
Resolution: No. 93-44
Mayor J. Sal Mur~oz presiding
Pastor Sofia Sadler, Harvester Church of Temecula
Mayor Pro Tem Roberrs
ROLL CALL:
Birdsall, Parks, Roberrs, Stone, Mu~oz
PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS
PUBLIC FORUM
This is a portion of the City Council meeting unique to the City of Temecula. At the
meeting held on the second Tuesday of each month, the City Council will devote a
period of time (not to exceed 30 minutes) for the purpose of providing the public with
an opportunity to discuss topics of interest with the Council. The members of the City
Council will respond to questions and may give direction to City staff. The Council is
prohibited, by the provisions of the Brown Act, from taking any official action on any
matter which is not on the agenda. If you desire to speak on any matter which is
listed on the agenda, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with
the City Clerk.
2/agendN060893
~- I Oe/O2f13
For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk
before the Council gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual
speakers.
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be
enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless
members of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent
Calendar for separate action.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Standard Ordinance Adoption Procedure
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions
included in the agenda.
2
Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve the minutes of May 11, 1993;
2.2 Approve the minutes of May 25, 1993;
3
Resolution ADDrOving List of Demands
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
4 City Treasurer's RePort
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Receive and file report.
21agenda/OBOBg3
06.'02/~3
5
BudQet Adjustment for Microfilm Purchase and Insurance Internal Fund
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1
5.2
Approve a residual equity transfer of $69,520,00 from General Fund
Undesignated Fund Balance to the Copy Center Internal Service Fund Account
for the purchase of microfilm reproductive equipment.
APpropriate $40,000 from the Insurance Internal Service Fund to Account No.
300-199-999-5207 - Claims.
6
7
Resolution DesiQnatinq City's A{~ent for Obtainina Federal Disaster Assistance
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
DESIGNATING AN AGENT TO ACT IN THE CITY'$ BEHALF FOR THE PURPOSE
OF OBTAINING CERTAIN FEDERAL ASSISTANCE
General Plan Contract Amendment for Supplemental Work Performed in Conjunction
with Completion of the General Plan
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1
Amend the General Plan Contract by $27,750. for the completion of the Work
Program.
8
Award of Weed Abatement Services
RECOMMENDATION:
8.1 Award a contract for weed abatement services on an as-needed basis to: Smith
Tractor Services (Primary Contractor) and Rory Rieck (Secondary Contractor) '
8.2 Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the appropriate agreements.
2/leendl/060883
3
" O8~2~3
Cooperative Aqreement with County of Riverside for the Community Development
Block Grant Prooram
RECOMMENDATION:
9.1
Approve the three-year cooperative agreemtn with the County of Riverside for
the administration of the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG)
Program.
SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES
10 Temporary Sion Ordinance
RECOMMENDATION:
10. 1 Read by title only and adopt an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 93-12
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
AMENDING PORTIONS OF ORDINANCE NO. 348 AND 92-16 PERTAINING TO
THE REGULATION OF TEMPORARY SIGNS
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before a public
hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the
approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the
projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or
someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondences
delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing.
11 Develooment Processinq Fees
(Continued from the meeting of May 11, 1'993)
RECOMMENDATION:
11.1 Adopt an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 93-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ADOPTING A DEVELOPMENT PROCESSING FEE STRUCTURE FOR PLANNING,
ENGINEERING AND BUILDING SAFETY SERVICES AND REPEALING
RESOLUTION NO. 90-81
21egenddOe0883 4
06/02/93
12 ADDeal Of Planning Commission Decision - PA-93-0038 - Minor CUP
(Continued from the meeting of May 25, 1993 - A request to convert an existing
young adult nightclub into an adult only nightclub which will allow the selling and on-
site consumption of alcohol)
RECOMMENDATION:
12.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DENYING
pa 93-0038, MINOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, AFFIRMING THE PLANNING
COMMISSION DECISION TO DENY SAID APPLICATION TO ALLOW THE
CONVERSION OF AN EXISTING YOUNG ADULT NIGHTCLUB INTO AN ADULT
ONLY NIGHTCLUB WHICH WILL ALLOW THE SELLING AND ON-SITE
CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOL LOCATED AT 28822 FRONT STREET
13
Five-year Aooroval Period for Plot Plans. Public Use Permits, and Conditional Use
Permits
RECOMMENDATION:
13.1
Direct staff to prepare an Ordinance allowing for two additional one-year
extensions of time for plot plans, public use permits and conditional use
permits.
14
Develooment Aqreement No. 91-01, Change of Zone No. 21, Tentative Parcel MaD No.
27314 - (Linfield School)
RECOMMENDATION:
14.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION N.O. 93-_.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DENYING '
DEVELOPEMTN AGREEMENT NO. 92-1, CHANGE OF ZONE NO. 21~ AND
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 27314, AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO ENSURE THE
DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROJECT AS SENIOR HOUSING, CONGREGATE CARE
FACILITY, SKILLED NURSING, PERSONAL CARE, A NINE HOLE PRIVATE GOLF
COURSE AND DEDICATION OF A 2.3 NET ACRE PARCEL TO THE CITY OF
TEMECULA FOR A SENIOR CITIZEN CENTER, A ZONE CHANGE FROM R-R
(RURAL RESIDENTIAL) TO R-3 (GENERAL RESIDENTIAL) AND TO SUBDIVIDE
A 96.7 ACRE PARCEL INTO 4 PARCELS AND A 48.4 ACRE REMAINDER
PARCEL LOCATED EAST OF TEMECULA HIGH SCHOOL, SOUTH OF RANCHO
VISTA ROAD AND NORTH OF PAUBA ROAD.
21aoefd~/Oe0893
06/02/93
COUNCIL BUSINESS
15
Temecula Shuttle - General Public Dial-A-Ride Proposal
RECOMMENDATION:
15.1 Review proposal submitted by Temecula Shuttle to implement a general Public
Dial-A-Ride Service and provide direction to Staff.
16
17
No Smokino Ordinance - City Parks
(Continued from the meeting of May 11, 1993)
RECOMMENDATION:
16.1 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 93~
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 92-37 SETTING FORTH PARK AND
RECREATIONAL FACILITY OPERATIONAL POLICIES AND REGULATIONS
Boys and Girls Club Fundine
RECOMMENDATION:
17.1 Approve loan agreement of $374,846 with the Boys and Girls Club for
construction of the Boys and Girls Club Facility.
18 ADDointmentS to Development Advisory Committee
RECOMMENDATION:
18.1 Appoint a representative from the'City Council and five members-at-large to the
Development Code Advisory Committee
19 Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce ReQuest for Grant - Tourism AdvertisinQ
RECOMMENDATION:
19.1
Consider the request of the Tourism 'Council of the temecula Valley Chamber
of Commerce for $5,000 to be used in an advertising campaign which will be
coordinated with the Vintner's Association.
2/aOende/060693
8 ~
oe~2a3
20
Settlement of Claim - Community Lutheran Church
RECOMMENDATION
20.1 Approve an agreement entitled:
20.2 Authorize the Mayor and the City Clerk to execute the agreement on behalf of
the City of Temecula.
CITY MANAGER REPORT
CITY ATTORNEY REPORT
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT
Next meeting: June 15, 1993, 7:00 PM, General Plan Public Hearing, 28816 Pujol
Street, Temecula California.
Next regular meeting: June 22, 1993, 7:00 PM, Temecula Community Center, 28816
Pujol Street, Temecula, California
2/~endWOBOB83
7
CALL TO ORDER:
President Patricia H. Birdsall
ROLL CALL:
DIRECTORS:
Mufioz, Parks, Roberts, Stone, Birdsall
PUBLIC COMMENT:
Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors, should
present a completed pink "Request to Speak" to the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state
your name and address for the record.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of May 11, 1993
1.2 Approve the minutes of May 25, 1993
2
Contract Amendment - Wimmer Yamada Associates - Pala Road Park Site
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1
Approve amendment of $21,038 to contract with Wimrner Yamada Associates
(WYA) to provide additional engineering services for the Pala Road park site >
2.2
Appropriate $21,038 in the Capital Projects fund (No. 210-190-120-5802)
from Development Impact Fees.
3
Acceptance of Easement Deeds for Slope Maintenance - Preslev ComPanies
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1
Accept easement deeds for the TCSD to provide slope maintenance services
within Tracts 23267-0, 23267-1, 23267-4 and 26861-1 within the Presley
Development.
2/egendNOBOae3 8 ~
0G/02/13
4
Teen Recreation Center Status Reoort
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Receive and file report.
DISTRICT BUSINESS
5 NaminQ of City Park Sites
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1
Consider and if desired, approve official names for a 28.6 acre community park
adjacent to Pala Road, a one (1) acre park in the Presley Development, a nine
(9) acre park site in the Presley Development and a nine (9) acre park site in the
Paloma Del Sol Development.
GENERAL MANAGERS REPORT - Dixon
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT - Nelson
BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT:
Next regular meeting June 22, 1993, 8:00 PM, Temecula
Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California
2tegendNOt10883
08/02/~3
CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Ronald J. Parks presiding
ROLL CALL: AGENCY MEMBERS: Brd~ll, Mu~oz, Ro~, Sty, Par~
PUBLIC COMMENT:
AGENCY BUSINESS
Anyone wishing to address the Agency, should present a
completed pink "Request to Speak" to the City Clerk. When you
are called to speak, please come forward and state your name
and address for the record.
Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1
1.2
Approve the minutes of May 11, 1992.
Approve the minutes of May 25, 1992.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
AGENCY MEMBER'S REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT: Next regular meeting June 22, 1993, 8:00 PM, Temecula
Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California
21egenele/OeOBg3 10 06/02/83 ""'
PROCLAMATIONS
AND
PRESENTATIONS
ITEM
1
ITEM
NO.
2
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
MAY 11, 1993
A regular meeting of the Temecula City Council was called to order on Tuesday, May 11,
1993, 7:20 P.M., at the Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula,
California. The meeting was called to order by Mayor J. Sal Mu~oz. Mayor Pro Tem Roberrs
led the flag salute.
PRESENT: 5
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Parks, Roberrs, Stone,
Mufioz
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Also present were City Manager David F. Dixon, Assistant City Manager Woody Edvalson,
City Attorney Scott Field, City Clerk June S. Greek and Recording Secretary Gail Zigler.
INVOCATION
Pastor James Field, First Baptist Church, presented the invocation.
PRESENTATIONS/
PROCLAMATIONS
Mayor Mur~oz proclaimed the month of May, 1993 as Water Awareness Month on behalf of
Eastern Municipal Water District.
Mayor Mu~oz proclaimed May 19, 1993 as Transit Appreciation Day, celebrating National
Transportation Week.
Mayor Mu~oz presented the following list of 6th and 7th grade students with awards for their
participation in the Bicycle Safety Essay Contest:
Placq Name
6th Grade Girls
1 st Dione Cunningham
2nd Ramona Cruz
3rd Cindi Cook
6th Grade Boys
I st Alex Paterson
2nd Luke Lindquist
CCMINS/11/93
School
Margarita Middle School
Margarita Middle School
Linfieid
Margarita Middle School
Margarita Middle School
Bike
Bike Helmet
$50 Savings Bond
Bike
Bike Helmet
611193
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
3rd Numair Khaled
7th Grade Girls
Margarita Middle School
MAY 11.1993
$50 Savings Bond
I st Alicia Oneil Linfield Bike
2nd Nora Addam Temecula Middle School Bike Helmet
3rd Vanessa Beeson Margarita Middle School $50 Savings Bond
7th Grade Boys
I st Kendall Bellini Linfield Bike
2nd Ken Hamamoto Linfield Bike Helmet
3rd Mike Avila Linfield $50 Savings Bond
PUBLIC FORUM
Stephen Boyer, 25205 Via Las Lomas, Murrieta, thanked the Council for all their work on the
Murrieta Creek Flood Control Plan and suggested that the Council send forth a letter or memo
to the Army Corp of Engineers, advising them that the Council, City Staff, public, County
Flood Control, etc., are working together on a feasible plan.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Mayor Mur~oz requested Item No. 10 be removed from Consent Calendar and continued after
the recess to allow Council time to review the staff report which was distributed prior to the
start of the meeting.
It was moved by Councilmember Stone, seconded by Councilmember Roberts to approve
Consent Calendar Items No. 1 - 9 and Item No. 11.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 5
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Parks, Roberts, Stone,
Mufioz
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Standard Ordinance Adootion Procedure
RECOMMENDATION:
CCMIN5/I 1193
-2- ~"~,
6/1193
4
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES MAY 11, 1993
1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions
included in the agenda.
Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
2.5
Approve the minutes of March 30, 1993;
Approve the minutes of April 6, 1993;
Approve the minutes of April 13, 1993;
Mayor Pro Tem Roberts asked that Page 11, reflect the correct vote as
follows:
AYES:
3 COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: 2 COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Approve the minutes of April 19, 1993;
Approve the minutes of April 20, 1993.
Birdsall, Parks,
Mur~oz
Roberrs, Stone
None
Resolution ADoroving List of Demands
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-33
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
City Treasurer's Reoort
RECOMMENDATION:
CCMINS/11193
6/1193
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES MAY 11, 1993
4.1 Receive and file the City Treasurer's report as of March 31, 1993.
e
ADorove Records Destruction Schedule
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1 Approve scheduled destruction of certain records as provided under the
City of Temecula approved Records Retention Policy.
Resolution Reconfirmina Lor,4l ;mergency
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-34
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
RECONFIRMING THE EXISTENCE OF A LOCAL EMERGENCY
e
Fourth Amendment to the Joint Powers Agreement Creatina the Riverside County
Habitat Conservation Agency
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1
Approve an amendment to Section 3.7.4 of the Joint Powers Agreement
creating the Riverside County Habitat Conservation Agency (the
"Agreement) and authorize the Mayor to sign the amended agreement.
Establishment of a Second Deferred Comoensation Plan Ootion
RECOMMENDATION:
8.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-35
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
ESTABLISHING A DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN
OF TEMECULA
CCMIN5/11/93
6/1193
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES MAY 11, 1993
9. Award of Professional Services Contracts for Civil En{;ineerin{;, Land Surveyin{;.
Structural Enqineerinq, and Soils Testin{; - Liefer Road Crossin{; (PW 93-02)
RECOMMENDATION:
9.1
Approve an operating transfer from the General Fund to the Capital
Improvement Fund in the amount of $29,300. (including 10%
contingency) for the design and construction of the Liefer Road
Crossing, Project Number PW 93-02.
9.2
9.3
9.4
9.5
Award a Professional Services Contract to NBS/Lowry for Civil
Engineering Services in the amount of $10,720 and authorize the Mayor
and City Clerk to execute the agreements.
Award a Professional Services Contract to NBS/Lowry for construction
staking services ir~ the amount of $700 and authorize the Mayor and
City Clerk to execute the agreements.
Award a Professional Services Contract to Leighton and Associates for
soils testing and observation in the amount of $10,968 and authorize
the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the agreements.
Award a Professional Services Contract to McDaniel Engineering for
structural engineering services in the amount of $4,250 and authorize
the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the agreements.
11.
Second Readin{; of Ordinance No. 93-09 - Establishinq Regulations for Use of Outdoor
Advertisinq Disolavs
RECOMMENDATION:
11.1 Read by title only and adopt an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 93-09
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTAB-
LISHING REGULATIONS FOR USE OF OUTDOOR ADVERTISING DISPLAYS
PUBLIC HEARINGS
12. ChanQe of Zone No. 23 - Safa Muhtaseb
Planning Director Gary Thornhill presented the staff report.
CCMIN5/11/93 -5-
611193
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
MAY 11.1993
Mayor Mufloz opened the public hearing at 7:50 P.M. There being no requests to
speak the public hearing was closed.
It was moved by Councilmember Stone, seconded by Councilmember Parks to approve
staff recommendation as follows:
12.1
Adopt a Negative Declaration for Change of Zone No. 23.
12.2
Read by title only and introduce an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 93-11
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY FOR THE CHANGE OF
ZONE APPLICATION CONTAINED IN CHANGE OF ZONE NO. 23, CHANGING
THE ZONE FROM R-3-4,000 (GENERAL RESIDENTIAL) TO C-0 (COMMERCIAL
OFFICE) ON PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RANCHO
CALIFORNIA ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 450 FEET EAST OF THE
INTERSECTION OF VIA LAS COLINAS AND RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD
KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 944-290-009.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES:
5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Parks, Roberrs, Stone,
Mufloz
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Mayor Mu~oz adjourned the meeting at 7:50 P.M. to the Temecula Community Services
District meeting. The City Council meeting was reconvened at 7:55 P.M.
13.
Development Processinq Fees
City Attorney Scott Field presented the staff report.
Mayor Mu~oz opened the public hearing at 8:10 P.M.
Russell Rumansoff, 27349 Jefferson Avenue, Temecula, representing the Economic
Development Corporation, advised the Council that the EDC Expediting Committee
voted in opposition to any increased fees at this time and they appreciated staff's
effort to decrease fees where possible. Mr. Rumansoff asked the Council to reconsider
any increases until the economy has had an opportunity to recover.
CCMIN5/11/93
6/1193
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
MAY 11o 1993
Lou Kashmere, 29115 Front Street, Temecula, stated there currently is no fee
structure for a Tentative Parcel Map with a in-fill improved or partially improved
property, where a development application fee has been paid and other review
processes have been completed. Mr. Kashmere feels that these fees should be similar
to those charged to revise an approved Plot Plan or CUP because it requires
significantly less time to review.
Planning Director Gary Thornhill concurred that the process is much faster and stated
he would support recommending a reduced fee.
Councilmember Parks stated that he was in favor of supporting staff recommendation
except for Exhibit 4 which he feels should be part of the planning application fee and
not set up as a seperate fee under Community Services.
Director Thornhill stated that concern was expressed to him regarding the review of
landscape plans. Director Thornhill stated that currently if someone came in with a
very large project, the fee could be very high. He suggested that he could consult with
local contractors and establish a cap fee for landscape review. Director Thornhill
suggested that the Council continue this item and allow staff time to make some
modifications.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Stone to continue
this item to the meeting of June 8, 1993.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 5
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Parks, Roberts, Stone,
Mu~ioz
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Mayor MuAoz declared a recess at 8:25 P.M. The meeting was reconvened at 8:45 P.M.
14. Redevelooment Assistance for Construction and Exoansion - Wal Mart Project
City Manager David Dixon requested this item be continued to the meeting of June 22,
1993.
Mayor Murioz opened the public hearing at 8:45 P.M.
Jo Subik, 39250 Deputy Road, Temecula, told the Councilmembers that she feels the
Wal Mart store will be a detriment to the community and is opposed to the city
providing financing or incentives.
CCMIN5/11/93
-7-
6/1/93
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES MAY 11.1993
It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Roberrs, seconded by Councilmember Birdsall to
continue this item to the meeting of June 22, 1993.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall,
Mur~oz
None
None
Parks, Roberts, Stone,
15.
Redevelooment Assistance for Construction and Exoansion - Professional Hospital
City Manager David Dixon presented the staff report.
Mayor Muftoz opened the public hearing at 8:50 P.M.
John Luttgens, President of the Medical Design Concepts, explained how the loan
program was developed for PHS and provided an overview of the current goal for
Professional Hospital Supply, AMMA and Medical Design Concepts.
Mayor Mur~oz stated that he feels employee credit should be an incentive for non-sales
tax generating business and that the City is being quite generous with the reduction
of the loan balance by increased sales tax.
Councilmember Stone stated that he feels the City is going out of its way to encourage
PHS to do business in Temecula with the sales tax reduction and is not comfortable
adding the employee credit.
Mr. Luttgens explained that it would be more cost efficient for Medical Design
Concepts to operate out of state, however~ based on the negotiations with the City
Manager, the owner of the company made the decision to stay in Temecula.
Mayor Mu~oz stated that he would like to see a commitment from PHS or Medical
Design Concepts, that they will remain in the City of Temecula for a specified number
of years and asked Mr. Luttgens if he would commit to that proposal.
Mr. Luttgens stated that he is more comfortable with tying the agreement to the length
of the loan as presented and would not want to commit to a specified number of
years. Mr. Luttgens explained that the sterilization facility is a single use facility and
Mr. Hoffe would not commit to building a facility of this nature if he was not planning
to keep the businesses in Temecula.
CCMIN5111193
6/1/93
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
MAY 11, 1993
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Roberrs to
approve staff recommendation as follows:
15.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-36
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVING THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY LENDING FUNDS TO
ASSIST PROFESSIONAL HOSPITAL SUPPLY, INC., AMERICAN MATERIAL
MANAGEMENT ALLIANCE,INC., MEDICAL DESIGN CONCEPT, INC., AND
JOHN HOFFEE IN EXPANDING INTO TWO MEDICAL DEVICES SUPPLY
FACILITIES IN THE CRYSTAL RIDGE BUSINESS PARK
The motion carried as follows:
AYES:
3 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Parks, Roberts
NOES:
2 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Murtoz, Stone
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
16. Redevelooment Assistance - OoeratinQ Fund Loan - Quicksilver
Councilmember Birdsall stepped down due to a possible conflict of interest.
City Attorney Scott Field presented the staff report.
Mayor Mu~oz declared a recess at 9:34 P.M. to change the tape. The meeting was
reconvened at 9:36 P.M.
Mayor Pro Tem Roberrs expressed concern that the stockholders of the company
refused to sign the loan documents.
City Manager Dixon stated that if the Letter of Credit is in good standing, it is all the
security needed for the loan.
Councilmember Stone stated that he would be in favor of approving staff's
recommendation as long as staff secures a guarantee that the Letter of Credit is in
good standing.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Stone to approve ·
staff recommendation, subject to verification of the Letter of Credit, as follows:
/'-- CCMIN5/11183
8/'1193
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES MAY 11, 1993
16.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-37
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVING THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY LENDING $60,000 TO
QUICKSILVER ENTERPRISES, INC., TO RESTORE FACILITIES DESTROYED BY
THE JANUARY, 1993 FLOODS
The motion carried as follows:
AYES:
4 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Parks, Roberrs, Stone, Mur~oz
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSTAIN: 1
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall
COUNCIL BUSINESS
10. Award of Contract - Special Counsel - Continued for one week (511 8~93) (5-0-0) RRIRP
City Manager David Dixon presented the staff report.
Mayor Mur~oz asked why the City does not use its current counsel.
City Manager Dixon advised that Burke Williams and Sorenson have not been working
in the area of labor relations for very long and he feels that the recommended firm
would better provide the City with the expertise in this area.
Mayor Mu~oz stated that he would like to see the City Council involved in the
interview process, specifically himself. Mayor Mur~oz stated that he would like more
time to review the staff report.
It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Roberts, seconded by Councilmember Parks to
continue this Item to the meeting of May 18, 1993.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 5
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Parks, Roberrs, Stone,
Mur~oz
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
CCMINS/11/93
6/1193
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
ABSENT: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS: None
MAY 11.1993
18.
Ordinance Amendino Park and Recreational Facility Ooeration Policies and Reaulations-
Smokino Policy for City Parks and Recreational Facilities
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Stone to continue
this Item to the meeting of June 8, 1993.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 5
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall,
Mu~oz
None
None
Parks, Roberts, Stone,
17.
Second Readina of Ordinance No. 93-10 -Addinq Sections to Graffiti Ordinance
Assistant City Manager Woody Edvalson presented the staff report.
It was moved by Councilmember Stone, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Roberts to
approve staff recommendation as follows:
17.1
Read by title only and adopt an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 93-10
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADDING
SECTIONS 6.14.304 THROUGH 6.14.308, INCLUSIVE, TO CHAPTER 6.14 OF
THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO GRAFFITI
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 4
NOES: 1
ABSENT: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Parks, Roberts, Stone, Mu~oz
Birdsall
None
19. Enabling Ordinance - Adoorion of Develooment linDact Fees
City Manager David Dixon advised the Council that during a meeting held today with
CCMIN511 1/93 -11 -
6/1193
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
MAY 11, 1993
many of the major industry leaders from the community and after a lengthy discussion,
it was recommended that this item be continued for sixty days to further explore
options and alternatives and understand the impacts this ordinance will have on the
current, expanding and future businesses.
It was moved by Councilmember Stone, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Roberrs to
continue this item for 60 days.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 5
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Parks, Roberrs, Stone,
Mur~oz
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Roberrs, seconded by Councilmember Stone to extend the
meeting at 11:00 P.M. to 11:15 P.M. The motion was uanimously approved.
20.
Consideration of Emolover/Emolovee Resolution
Assistant City Manager Woody Edvalson presented the staff report.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Roberts to
approve staff recommendation as follows:
RECOMMENDATION:
20.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-38
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
IMPLEMENTING EMPLOYER-EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATIONS RELATIONS POLICY
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Parks, Roberts, Stone, Mur~oz
NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: I COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall
CCMIN51I 1193 -12-
611193
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
CITY MANAGER REPORT
MAY 11, 1993
City Manager Dixon advised that he had received a memorandum from Director of Public
Works Tim Serlet asking that the Council appoint two members to participate on a joint
committee for resolving issues of the Murrieta Creek.
Mayor Mur~oz and Councilmember Parks volunteered to serve on the committee.
Councilmember Parks recommended cancelling the May 13, 1993 Assessment Districts 159
and 161 workshop, in order to allow staff and Council to attend the funeral for the Temecula
Police Officer who was killed in the line of duty.
CITY ATTORNEY REPORT
None
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Councilmember Parks stated that he is concerned with the perceived difficulty in getting a
sign permit through the City. Councilmember Parks suggested that staff may want to look
into a pamphlet or standard procedure for obtaining these permits.
Planning Director Thornhill stated that he has had no complaints, but would look into the
matter.
Councilmember Stone stated that he had several requests by citizens to look into property
maintenance ordinances and asked if Director Thornhill could assist him in getting some model
ordinances from other cities.
Mayor Mu~oz stated that staff should report on the periodic procedure for review by Code
Enforcement.
Mayor Mu~oz stated that he would be reporting on his trip to Sacramento at the May 18,
1993 Council meeting.
Mayor Mu~oz stated he has concerns with the Resolution for the Murrieta Creek and that it
lacked the spirit and the direction that was given.
City Clerk June Greek stated that the Murrieta and Temecula Council's action was to adopt
the same Resolution as proposed by the City of Murrieta and both Resolutions are identical.
She suggested some style modifications to address Mayor Mufioz's concerns.
City Manager Dixon suggested that staff bring it back in two weeks.
CCMIN5/11/93
61~193
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES MAY 11, 1993
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Roberrs, to adjourn at
11:15 P.M. The motion was unanimously carried.
The next meeting of the Temecula City Council will be held on Tuesday, May 18, 1993, 7:00
PM, General Plan Public Hearing, at Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street,
Temecula, California.
The next regular meeting of the Temecula City Council will be held on Tuesday, May 25,
1993, 7:00 P.M., Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California.
J. Sal Muf~oz, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
CCMIN5/11193 -14- 611/93
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
HELD MAY 25, 1993
A regular meeting of the Temecula City Council was called to order at 7:08 PM at the
Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California. Mayor J. Sal Mu~oz
presiding.
PRESENT 3 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Parks, Mur~oz
ABSENT: 2 COUNCILMEMBERS: Roberrs, Stone
Also present were Assistant City Manager Harwood Edvalson, City Attorney Scott F. Field,
and City Clerk June S. Greek.
INVOCATION
The invocation was given by Assistant Pastor Nick La Bruno, of the Calvary Chapel of
Temecula.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The audience was led in the flag salute by Councilmember Parks who asked that the men and
women who have died in the service of our country be remembered as Memorial Day
approaches.
PRESENTATIONS AND PROCLAMATIONS
Award of Valor - Juaneice Rigas
Mayor Mufioz introduced Deputy Mark Leggett who briefly described the heroism of 14-year
old Juaniece Riggs, who responded to an emergency situation and prevented a serious
accident. The mayor presented Juaniece with an Award of Valor signed by the members of
the City Council and expressed the City's gratitud.e for her bravery and presence of mind.
Inland EmPire Design Institute Achievement Award
Planning Director Gary Thornhill described the events which led up to the City being honored
with the Award of Distinction from the Inland Empire Design Institute for the Old Town
Temecula Specific Plan. Mr. Thornhill thanked the City staff and members of the Steering
Committee who were responsible for the preparation of the plan and presented the award to
the Mayor and City Council.
4-H Citizen Leadership Group
The Temecula Valley Wranglers, a 4-H group led by Mindy Bachelor, presented a skit that
highlighted some of projects that 4-H members are involved in.
Minutes\5/25\93
ol-
O5128/93
City Council Minutes
Mev 25, 1993
PUBLIC COMMENTS
John Dedovesh, 39450 Long Ridge Drive, discussed the increased numbers of illegally parked
vehicles for sale on various City streets and asked that code and law enforcement make
increased attempts to curb this problem.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Councilmember Birdsall advised that she would be abstaining from Consent Calendar item
number eight (8) due to a possible conflict of interest. Councilmember Parks stated that he
would like to review the bid document for item eight prior to it being made public.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Birdsall to approve items
1 through 10 as follows:
2
3
4
Standard Ordinance Adoorion Procedure
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included
in the agenda.
Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve the minutes of April 27, 1993
Resolution Aoorovina List of Demands
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-39
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
Combinina Balance Sheet March 3, 1993 and Statement of Revenues. Expenditures
and Chanaes in Fund Balance for the Nine Months Ended March 31, 1993
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1
Receive and File Report
Minutes\5/25%93 -2- 05/28/93
City Council Minutes
May 25. 1993
5 Installation of Five (5) Stop Sians
(Southbound Maskuaz Court @ East Loma Linda Rd., southbound Via Consuelo @
Loma Linda Rd., southbound Esplendor Court @ Loma Linda Rd., northbound Esmerado
Court @ Loma Linda Rd., and westbound East Loma Linda Rd., @ Loma Linda Rd.)
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 9340
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ESTABLISHING STOP SIGNS
6
"No Parkina" Zone - Rancho California Road at Via Las Colinas
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 9341
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ESTABLISHING "NO PARKING" ZONE ON RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AT
VIA LOS COLINAS
Installation of Stop Siqn Control at the Intersection of Mercedes and Sixth Streets
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 9342
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ESTABLISHING STOP SIGNS AT THE INTERSECTION OF MERCEDES AND
SIXTH STREET
Minutes\5/25~93
-3-
05128/93
City Council MinuTes
9
May 25. 1993
Final Parcel MaD No. 24586
A five (5) lot commercial subdivision located on 5.42 acres at the northwesterly corner
of Diaz Road and Via Dos Picos.
RECOMMENDATION:
9.1 Approve Final Parcel Map No. 24586
SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES
10 Ordinance ADorovina Chanae of Zone No. 23 - Safa Muhtaseb
RECOMMENDATION:
10.1
Read by title only and adopt an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 93-11
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY FOR THE CHANGE OF
ZONE APPLICATION CONTAINED IN CHANGE OF ZONE NO. 23, CHANGING
THE ZONE FROM R-3-4,000 (GENERAL RESIDENTIAL) TO C-O (COMMERCIAL
OFFICE) ON PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RANCHO
CALIFORNIA ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 450 FEET EAST OF THE
INTERSECTION OF VIA LAS COLINAS AND RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD
KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 944-290-009.
The motion carried by the following vote:
AYES:
3 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Parks, Mu~oz,
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 2 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Roberrs, Stone
e
Solicitation of Bids for the FY 93-94 Annual Street Maintenance Proaram
RECOMMENDATION:
8.1 Authorize the Public Works Department to solicit bids
implementation of the FY 93-94 Street Maintenance Program.
Minutes~5/25~93
for the
05128/93
City Council Minutes
The motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: 2 COUNCILMEMBERS: Parks, Mur~oz,
NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 2 COUNCILMEMBERS: Roberrs, Stone
ABSTAIN: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall
May 25. 1993
PUBLIC HEARINGS
11
12
ADoeal of Plannina Commission Decision - PA 93-0038, Minor Condition Use Permit
(A request to convert an existing teen night club to an adult night club at 28822 Front
Street, Suite 203.)
Planning Director Gary Thornhill presented the staff report recommending that the City
Council reaffirm the Planning Commission decision to deny the applicant's request.
Councilmember Birdsall advised that she would abstain from participating on this
matter due to the close proximity of a business owned by she and her husband.
City Attorney Scott Field advised the Council that since a quorum would not exists as
a result of Councilmember Birdsall's abstention, the matter should be continued to a
date when a quorum is present.
Mayor Mu~oz opened the Public Hearing at 7:42 PM
Charles T. Bell, 113E Bay Avenue, Newport Beach, CA, representing the applicant
objected to delays of this matter because of the cost to the applicant.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Birdsall to
continue the Public Hearing to the meeting of June 8, 1993. The motion was
unanimously carried, with Councilmember Stone and Mayor Pro Tem Roberrs absent.
Amendment to Ordinance Requlatina Temporary Sians
Planning Director Gary Thornhill introduced the staff report outlining the
recommendations of the Planning Commission.
Mayor Mu~oz stated that he would not oppose allowing an addition six month delay
of enforcement but he feels it is time the City begins to gain compliance with the
existing ordinance for the sake of overall aesthetics within the community. He also
Minutes\5/25\93
-5-
05128193
City Council Minutes May 25.1993
indicated he would be willing to allow certain temporary signs to remain in place for
up to 33% of the year.
Councilmember Parks stated a concern with eliminating all A-frame signs in areas other
than Old Town Temecula, and indicated he feels that allowing them to be used for at
least 16% of the year would be appropriate.
Council discussed the periods of time that should be permitted for attached and
detached temporary signs. Councilmember Birdsall suggested that enforcement be
instituted immediately, but that only a warning be issued within the first 90 days after
adoption of the ordinance.
The City Council, by consensus, deferred further consideration of this matter to a later
point in the agenda to allow staff to make the discussed modifications to the
ordinance.
RECESS
Mayor Mur~oz declared a recess at 8:08 PM, the meeting was reconvened immediately
following the Temecula Community Services District and the Temecula Redevelopment
Agency meetings at 8:47 PM.
13 Vesting Tentative Tract MaD 26941. Chanae of Zone No. 22
(A subdivision consisting of 133 acres northerly of DePortola Road, southerly of Pauba
Road and easterly of Butterfield Stage Road.)
Planning Director Gary Thornhill presented the staff report and indicated a correction
to the Conditions of Approval, eliminating condition No. 99 relating to Quimby Fees,
since this has been covered on the underlying map. He also advised that a condition
No. 33 should be added relating to trails to read, "Prior to the issuance of the first
occupancy permit, the equestrian trail along the entire easterly boundary shall be
completed. The trail shall be consistent with that shown in the Tentative Map and the
design guidelines prepared by Planning and Design Solutions".
Councilmember Birdsall clarified that this new condition is to follow condition No. 32,
not replace the condition shown as No. 33 in the staff report.
Mayor Mu~oz opened the pubic hearing at 8:58 PM.
John Wayland, 33342 Pauba Road, addressed the Council speaking on behalf of the
Pauba Ranchos Homeowners Association. He addressed access to Cee Cee Road and
stated the applicant will be required to install a road, to city standards and to be
maintained by the City, that will adjoin the country road maintained by the
Homeowners in the area. Mr. Wayland expressed concern that this may lead to
additional liability for the property owners in Pauba Ranchos.
Minutes\S/25\93
O5/28/93
CiW Council Minutes
May 25. 1993
City Engineer/Public Works Director Tim Serlet stated that he believes it is in the best
interests of the homeowners in the area to have standard paved roads installed at the
time of adjacent development. He advised that if the property owners have objections,
the condition can be eliminated since this road is not need to serve ingress or egress
needs of the residents of the new development.
Mr. Wayland also questioned if the equestrian/recreational trails within the proposed
development will be open to the public. Community Services Director Shawn Nelson
responded that the trail along Pauba Road would be an open, public trail and that the
trails within the proposed development will be maintained by the Crowne Hill
Homeowners Association and as such, access to the residents of Pauba Ranchos
would need to be granted, possibly by way of a reciprocal agreement between the two
organizations.
Mr. Wayland then addressed the dedication of Pauba Road and asked who would have
responsibility for maintenance of the Road when it is fully improved. Tim Serlet, Public
Works Director responded that the City will be responsible for maintaining the portion
that is within the City's boundaries (approximately 66%).
Perimeter walls and fencing were also discussed by Mr. Wayland who stated that the
Pauba Ranchos Property Owners Association would prefer to see three-rail wood
fencing on the eastern boundary of the development. Finally he questioned the height
that will be allowed for structures on the lots which lie within 200 feet of the existing
airstrip. Tim Serlet advised that this had been addressed by the Planning Commission
and that an avigation easement is required prior to recordation.
RECESS
Mayor Mufloz declared a one-minute break to change the tape at 9:26 PM
Ernie Egger, 27463 Enterprise Circle West, Temecula, representing the applicant,
Taylor Woodrow Homes, stated that the condition to improve Cee Cee Lane was
placed on the map prior to closing a cul-de-sac and the developer is not opposed to
deleting the condition to improve that road since it will not be possible for Crowne Hill
lots to access it due to existing topography. He also stated that the applicant would
not oppose a change in the condition to provide white rail fencing rather than block
walls on the easterly boundary of the development. With regard to the height
limitation, he stated that a natural 40 foot elevation change creates a buffer at the end
of the landing strip and should not pose a problem since the building heights on the
two adjoining lots will be 32 feet. The applicant requested that Condition 93 be
modified to allow septic systems wherever possible rather than requiring all lots to be
connected to the EMWD sewer system.
Public Works Director Serlet stated, that as a matter of policy, he would recommerld
sewer systems be required on all new development within the City. Councilmember
Parks indicated that if the applicant can show good percolation exists on the lots, he
would not be opposed to allowing use of septic systems.
Minutes\5/25%93
-7- O5128/93
City Council Minutes
May 25. 1993
Planning Director Gary Thornhill clarified that the applicant has referred to a 28-1ot
subdivision, when the proposal before the Council is for a 27-1ot subdivision, based
upon the Planning Commission's previous action.
Mr. Eggers stated that the applicant has redesigned the project to address the Planning
Commission concerns that the lots on Cee Cee Lane be all five-acre lots to buffer the
smaller residential lots and the Pauba Ranchos property.
It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Parks to
continue the public hearing to the meeting of July 13, 1993 and refer the concerns
regarding septic vs sewer systems and the design as it relates to the additional lot to
staff.
The motion was unanimously carried, with Mayor Pro Tem Roberts and Councilmember
Stone absent.
12. Amendment to Ordinance Reoulatine Temoorarv Signs(Continued)
City Attorney Scott Field requested additional clarification from the Council regarding
changes to be made to the ordinance prior to adoption. He asked if Council wished
to place a maximum number of days that a combination of temporary signs would be
permitted, and how the recommended percentages should be implemented.
Consensus direction was that 1) the period allowed in any given year would not
exceed 120 days; 2) that the allowed period for attached temporary signs would be
30 days on and 60 days off and 3) detached signs would be allowed on a not to
exceed 30 days, twice a year with at least a 60-day period between permits.
Councilmember Birdsall questioned how the one-year period would be structured and
suggested that to aid in monitoring the temporary permit periods a "sticker" system
be developed for placement on the permitted signs indicating the approved time period.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Birdsall to extend the
meeting at 10:00 PM for an additional 30 minutes. The motion was unanimously carried, with
Mayor Pro Tem Roberrs and Councilmember Stone absent.
14
APpointment of Plannine Commission Member
City Clerk June Greek presented the staff report, outlining the recommendations from
the Ad Hoc Committee consisting of Councilmember Parks and Councilmember Stone.
It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Parks to re-
appoint Linda Fahey to a second three-year term. The motion was unanimously carried
with Mayor Pro Tem Roberts and Councilmember Stone absent.
Minutes\S/25\93
-8- O5128/93
City Council Minutes
May 25. 1993
15 Lease of Microfilm EouiDment
City Clerk June Greek presented the staff report recommending the approval of a lease
with Burtronics Company for microfilm reproduction equipment to implement the City's
Records Management program.
Councilmember Birdsall asked if funds were available for the City to consider an
outright purchase rather than lease of this equipment. Finance Officer Mary Jane
McLarney stated that staff can research this and bring it back for consideration at a
later time.
Mayor Mu~oz asked how many cities in the Inland Empire are currently utilizing this
type of equipment. Barbara Bullard, representing Burtronics responded that
approximately 90% of the cities in Riverside and San Bernardino counties are
microfilming documents.
It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Parks to
approve staff recommendation, with the proviso that if it is economically feasible to
purchase this equipment a purchase agreement will be brought back to the Council for
approval. The motion was unanimously carried, with Mayor Pro Tem Roberts and
Councilmember Stone absent.
12
Amendment to Ordinance Regulatina Temporary Sians
City Attorney Scott Field read the changes to the proposed ordinance as follows:
"Section 4, Subsection C-1 In any year attached and detached temporary signage may
not be used in any combination.
Section 4, Subsection C-3 The maximum duration for detached promotional signage
is two (2), thirty (30) day periods per calendar year, provided that there shall be a
minimum sixty (60) day interval between any two thirty (30) day periods. The
maximum duration of attached promotional'signage is four (4), thirty (30) day periods
per calendar year, provided that there shall be a minimum sixty (60) day interval
between any two thirty (30) day periods.
Section 7, Subsection D-3 The maximum duration for attached promotional signs is
four, thirty (30) day periods per calendar year, provided that there shall be a minimum
sixty (60) day interval between any two thirty (30) day periods."
Minutes\5/25~,93
-9-
05/28/93
CiW Council Minutes
May 25, 1993
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Birdsall to
introduce an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 93-12
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
AMENDING PORTIONS OF ORDINANCE NO. 348 AND 92-16 PERTAINING TO
THE REGULATION OF TEMPORARY SIGNS
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES:
3 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Parks, Mu~oz,
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 2 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Roberrs, Stone
CITY MANAGER REPORTS
No report given.
CITY ATTORNEY REPORTS
No report given.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Councilmember Birdsall announced that two fund raisers would be held over the Memorial Day
weekend to benefit the children of Officer Kent Hindegardt and Allison Jacobs. She invited
all of the residents to enjoy a barn dance to be held in Old Town Temecula at the Midnight
Round-up on Saturday, May 29th and a Bowling Tournament to be held at Pinkys Bowl on
Memorial Day, May 31, 1993.
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Birdsall to adjourn at
10:24 PM to a meeting to be held on June 8, 1993, 7:00 PM, Temecula Community Center,
28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California.
ATTEST:
J. Sal Mu~oz, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
Minutes\5/25~93
-10o
05/28193
ITEM NO. 3
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS
SET FORTH IN EXItmIT A
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES P-ESOLVE,
DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A have been
audited by the City Manager, and that the same are hereby allowed in the amount of
$1,284,394.04.
Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 8th day of June, 1993.
ATTEST:
J. Sal Mu~oz, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
Resos 314
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA)
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby do certify that the
foregoing Resolution No. 93--- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of
the City of Temecula on the 8th day of June, 1993 by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOE:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
R=~o, 314 2 ~
CITY OF TEMECULA
LIST OF DEMANDS
05/20/93 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
05127/93 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
06/08/93 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
05/20/93 TOTAL PAYROLL:
TOTAL, LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 6/08/93 COUNCIL MEETING:
DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND:
$74,~2.97
$74,327.11
$1,039,093.06
$96,040.90
$1,284,394.~
CHECKS:
001
100
190
191
192
193
,,,,-~10
0
Z80
300
310
320
PAYROLL:
001
100
190
191
192
193
320
GENERAL
GAS TAX FUND
TCSD
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D
CAPITAL PROJECTS - TCSD
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY-CIp
INSURANCE FUND
VEHICLE FUND
INFORNATIONS SYSTEMS
COPY CENTER FUND
GENERAL (PAYROLL)
GAS TAX FUND (PAYROLL)
TCSD (PAYROLL)
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A (PAYROLL)
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B (PAYROLL)
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C (PAYROLL)
INSURANCE FUND (PAYROLL)
INFORMATION SYSTEMS (PAYROLL)
COPY CENTER FUND (PAYROLL)
TOTAL BY FUND:
$419,954.53
$45,080.53
$47,275.31
$4,116.67
$26,309,17
$24,644.01
$158,852.46
$448,425.41
$250.00
$1,715.06
$2,237,07
$8,961.46
$531.~6
$62,940.44
Sll,622,59
S15,497.39
$420.55
$?36.86
Sl,493.50
$600.93
$1,157.66
Sl,570.98
$1,188,353.1~
$96,040.'M)
$1,284,394.0~
PREPARED BY ICARNA MCINTYRE
I, ~v///~ '- )t//f~- ,g~,4)l~, CERTIFY
AR ~NIS~.LARN~,FINANCE CFFi'~~ ~
DAVE DIXON, CITY MANAGER
THAT THE FOLLONING IS TRUE AND CORRECT,
, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLON/NG ZS TRUE AND CORRECT.
VOUCHRE2
05/27/93
13:5~
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PER[OOS
PAGE
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
100 GAS TAX FUND
190 COMMUNITy SERVICES DISTRICT
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND
250 CAPITAL PROJECTS - TCSD
300 INSURANCE FUND
310 VEHICLES FUND
320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS
TOTAL
AMOUNT
352,138,28
35,498.04
16,523.09
561.00
20,116.38
158,743.46
447,983.84
1,440.00
1,615.97
4,4~.00
1,039,093,06
VOUCHRE2
05127193
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
10650
10664
10664
10664
10664
10664
10665
10665
10665
10665
10666
10666
10666
10667
10668
10668
10668
10668
10668
10668
10668
10668
10668
10668
10668
10668
10668
10668
10668
10668
10668
10668
10668
10668
10668
10668
10668
10668
10668
10668
10668
10669
10670
10670
13:54
CHECK
DATE
06/08/93
06/08/93
06/08/93
06/08/93
06/08/93
06108/93
06/08/93
06/08/93
06/08/93
06/08/93
06/08/93
06/08/93
06/08/93
06/08/93
06/08/93
06/08/93
06/08/93
06/08/93
06/08/93
06/08/93
06/08/93
06/08/93
06/08/93
06/08/93
06/08/93
06/08/93
06/08/93
06/08/93
06/08/93
06/08/93
06/08/93
06/08/93
06/08/93
06/08/93
06/08/93
06/08/93
06/08/93
06/08/93
06/08/93
06/08/93
06/08/93
06/08/93
06/08/93
06/08/93
VENDOR
NUMBER
000126
000126
000126
000126
000126
000178
000178
000178
000178
000231
000231
000231
000251
000285
000285
000285
000285
000285
000285
000285
000285
000285
000285
000285
000285
000285
000285
000285
000285
000285
000285
000285
000285
000285
000285
000285
000285
000285
000285
000285
000329
000~06
000406
VENDOR
NAME
SULLIVAN, CURTIS
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE
GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO
GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO
GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO
GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO
NBS/LO~RY
NBS/LOURY
NBS/LOk'RY
PLANNING CENTER, THE
SIR SPEEDY
SIR SPEEDY
SIR SPEEDY
SIR SPEEDY
SIR SPEEDY
SIR SPEEDY
SIR SPEEDY
SIR SPEEDY
SIR SPEEDY
SiR SPEEDY
SIR SPEEDY
SIR SPEEDY
SIR SPEEDY
SiR SPEEDY
SiR SPEEDY
SIR SPEEDY
SIR SPEEDY
SIR SPEEDY
SIR SPEEDY
SIR SPEEDY
SIR SPEEDY
SIR SPEEDY
SIR SPEEDY
SIR SPEEDY
SIR SPEEDY
SIR SPEEDY
SIR SPEEDY
URBAN DESIGN STUDIO
RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF
RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERZF
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERICOS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
REFUND/SULLiVAN CURTIS
PROVIDE MATERIAL AND LA
APRIL MONTHLY MAINT
APRIL MONTHLY NAINT
APRIL MONTHLY NAINT
CREDIT MEMO
LASERJET I I I MEN UPGRAD
TAX
386SL 25MHZ PC NOTEBOOK
TAX
TRAFFIC ~SIGNAL SYSTEM
DRAFT CAPITAL IMPRQVENE
1-15 INTERCHANGE
DEVELOPMENT CUDE PROCES
500 GOLD FOIL BUSINESS
500 GOLD FOIL BUSINESS
TAX
500 GOLD FOiL BUSINESS
500 BLACK & WHITE BUSIN
500 BLACK & WHITE BUSIN
500 BLACK & WH/TE BUSIN
TAX
500 GOLD FOIL BUSINESS
500 GOLD FOiL BUSINESS
500 GOLD FOIL BUSINESS
500 GOLD FOIL BUSINESS
TAX
500 BLACK & WHITE BUSIN
500 BLACK & WHITE BUSIN
500 BLACK & WHITE BUSIN
500 GOLD FOIL BUSINESS
TAX
500 BUSINESS CARDS; B/W
TAX
500/BUSINESS CARDS; B/W
TAX
BUILDING AND SAFETY PER
SHIPPING
TAX
500/BOX BUSINESS CARDS;
TAX
OLD TO~ SPECIFIC PLAN
LAW ENFORCEMENT/MAR
LAW ENFORCEMENT/MAR
ACCOUNT
NUHBER
001-2670
190-180-999-5212
190-180-999-5250
191-180-999-5510
193-180-999-5510
193-180-999-5510
001-170-999-5604
001-170-999-5604
001-170-999-5604
001-170-999-5604
100-164-999-5248
001-140-999-5248
100-164-999-5248.
001-161-999-5248
190-180-999-5220
190-180-999-5220
190-180-999-5220
190-180-999-5220
190-180-999-5220
190-180-999-5220
190-180-999-5220
190-180-999-5220
190-180-999-5220
190-180-999-5220
190-180-999-5220
190-180-999-5220
190-180-999-5220
190-180-999-5220
190-180-999-5220
190'180'999-5220
190-180-999-5220
190'180-999-5220
001-162-999-5220
001'162'999-5220
001-199-999-5220
001'199-999-5220
001-162-999-5222
001-162-999-5222
001-162-999-5222
250-190-129-5804
250-190-129-5804
001-161-999-5248
001-170-999-5288
001-170-999-5299
ITEM
AMOUNT
1,000.00
4,680.00
10,029.30
561.00
21,738.16
1,621.78'
334.00
25.89
1,250.00
96.88
2,900.00
500.00
1,500.00
2,353.50
36.00
36. O0
5.58
36.00
27.70
Z7.70
27.70
9.24
36. O0
36. O0
36.00
36.00
11.16
27.70
27.70
27.70
36. O0
9.24
27.70
2.15
27.70
2.15
965. O0
30.00
74.79
27.69
2.15
16,397.45
231,886.14
22,793.86
PAGE 2
CHECK
AMOUNT
1,000.00
35,386.68
1,706.77
4,900.00
2,353.50
1,648.75
16,397.45
VOUCHRE2
05127193
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
10670
10670
10670
10670
10670
10670
10671
10672
10673
10674
10676
10676
10677
106r6
10678
1O679
10679
106 79
10680
10680
10681
10681
10681
10682
10682
10682
1068]
10683
13:54
CHECK
DATE
06/08/93
06/08/93
06/08/93
06/08/93
06/08/93
06/08/93
06/08/93
06/08/93
06/08/93
06/08/93
06/08/93
06/08/93
06/08/93
06/08/93
06/08/93
06/08/93
06/08/93
06/08/93
06/08/93
06/08/93
06/08/93
06/08/93
06/08/93
06/08/93
06/08/93
06/08/93
06/08/93
06/08/93
06/08/93
06/08/93
06/08/93
VENDOR
NUMBER
000~06
000406
000406
000406
000406
000406
000411
000420
000434
000434
000712
000739
000749
000749
000757
000757
000881
000881
000883
000883
000883
000929
000929
000930
000930
000930
000951
000951
000951
000992
000992
VENDOR
NAME
RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF
RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF
RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERZF
RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF
RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF
RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOCX)
TRANS- PAC ] F ] C
SIERRA COMPUTER SYSTEMS
SIERRA COMPUTER SYSTEMS
FORD, STEVEN d.
ALEXANDER TRAFFIC SIGMA
GOLDEN STATE FENCE CO.
GOLDEN STATE FENCE CO.
CONCISE CONSTRUCTION
CONCISE CONSTRUCTION
OAKRIDGE LANDSCAPE/IRRI
OAKRIDGE LANDSCAPE/IRR]
MONTELEONE EXCAVATING
MONTELEONE EXCAVATING
NONTELEONE EXCAVATING
T.B. PENICK
T.B. PENZCK
NATIONAL EMBLEM
NATIONAL EMBLEM
NATIONAL EMBLEM
SOFTWARE SPECTRUM
SOFTWARE SPECTRUM
SOFTMARE SPECTRUM
RAMONA TIRE
RAMONA TIRE
CiTY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
LAW ENFONCEMENT/NAR
LAW ENFORCEMENT/MAR
LAW ENFORCEMENT/MAR
LAW ENFORCEMENT/MAR
LAW ENFORCEMENT/MAR
LAW ENFORCEMENT/MAR
MURRIETA CHANNEL CLEAN-
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES;
PRORRAMING ASSISTANCE
SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE -
PROF SERVICES CRC
RETENTION
INVOICE #10120 (ADDITIO
40' OF 6' CHAIN LINK FE
SERVICES THRU 05/18/93
RETENTION
PROVIDE LABOR, MATERIAL
RETENTION
EXTRA SQUARE A.C. FOOTA
A.C. REPAIRS; ASPHALT;
MO~ING OF PARIQ4AYS FROM
CONSTRUCTION OF THE CON
RETENTION
DESIGN #068404-O0/TEMEC
FREIGHT
TAX
i~1190 MORDPERFECT OFFIC
W104~ kK)RDPERFECT OFFIC
TAX
TIRES; 225/70R/19.5;MIC
MOUNT/BALANCE AND TAX
TOTAL CHECKS
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-170-999-5298
001-170-999-5290
001-170-999-5291
001-170-999-5281
001-170-999-5282
001-170-999-5262
001-166-999-5420
300-199-999-5207
320-199-999-5250
320-199-999-5211
250-190-129-5804
100-2035
190-180-999-5212
190-180-999-5212
210-199-801-5804
210-2035
210-190-1~-5804
210-2035
100-164-999-5402
100-164-999-5402
100-164-999-5402
250-190-129-5804
250-2035
001-170-999-5243
001-170-999-5243
001-170-999-5243
001-170-999-5221
001-170-999-5221
001-170-999-5221
310-164-999-5214
310-164-999-5214
ITEM
AMOUNT
20,374.40
6,714.16
6,458.73
17,394.12
2,865.60
16,723.38
1,415.00
1,440.00
873.00
3,600.00
7,080.00
1,459.00
585.00
739.37
138,724.62
13,872.46-
37,657.00
3,765.70-
3,539.04
21,100.00
5,000.00
489,860.00
48,986,00-
1,119.80
6.07
81.19
640.99
489.98
87.65
1,290.00
325.97
PAGE 3
CHECK
AMOUNT
325,210.39
1,415.00
1,~40.00
4,473.00
7,080.00
1,459.00
1,324.37
124,852.16
33,891.30
29,639.04
440,874.00
1,207.06
1,218.62
1,615.97
1,039,093.06
VOUCHRE2
05/27/93
11:09
CITY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE 8
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
100 GAS TAX FUND
190 COMMUNITy SERVICES DISTRICT
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND
300 INSURANCE FUND
310 VEHICLES FUND
320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS
330 COPY CENTER FUND
TOTAL
AMOUNT
36,919.62
8,04,1,81
20,391.00
1,520.4~
129.61
3,767.69
109.00
237.01
617.10
2,162.37
431.4,6
74,327.11
VOUCHRE2
05127193
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
10333
233805
233805
233805
233805
233805
233805
233805
233805
233805
233805
233805
233805
233805
233805
233805
233805
233805
255778
255778
255778
255778
255778
255778
255778
255778
255778
255778
255778
255778
255778
255778
255778
255778
255778
10585
10586
10587
10588
10588
10589
10590
10590
11:09
CHECK VENDOR VENDOR
DATE NUMBER NAME
05/06/93
05/20/93
05/20/93
05/20/93
05/20/93
05/20/93
05/20/93
05/20/93
05/20/93
05/20/93
05/20/93
05/20/93
05/20/93
05/20/93
05/20/93
05/20/93
05/20/93
05/20/93
05/20/93
05/20/93
05/20/93
05/20/93
05/20/93
05/20/93
05/20/93
05/20/93
05/20/93
05/20/93
05/20/93
05/20/93
05/20/93
05/20/93
05/20/93
05/20/93
05/20/93
05/27/93
05/27/93
05/27/93
05/27/93
05/27/93
05/27/93
05/27/93
05/27/93
000294 STATE COMPENSATION INS.
000444 FIRSTAX (EDD)
000444 FIRSTAX (EDD)
000444 FIRSTAX (EDD)
00044~ FIRSTAX (EDD)
000444 FIRSTAX (EDD)
000444 FIRSTAX (EDD)
000444 FIRSTAX (EDD)
O004Jd+ FIRSTAX (EDD)
00044~ FIRSTAX (EDD)
000444 FIRSTAX (EDD)
000444 FIRSTAX (EDD)
0004~ FIRSTAX (EDD)
000444 FIRSTAX (EDD)
000444 FIRSTAX (EDD)
000444 FIRSTAX (EDD)
000~,4 FIRSTAX (EDD)
000444 FIRSTAX (EDD)
000283 FIRSTAX (IRS)
000283 FIRSTAX (IRS)
000283 FIRSTAX CIRS)
00028] FIRSTAX (IRS)
000283 FIRSTAX (IRS)
000283 FIRSTAX (IRS)
000283 FIRSTAX (IRS)
000283 FIRSTAX (IRS)
000283 FIRSTAX (IRS)
000283 FIRSTAX (IRS)
000283 FIRSTAX CIRS)
000283 FIRSTAX (IRS)
000283 FIRSTAX (IRS)
000283 FZRSTAX (IRS)
000283 FIRSTAX (IRS)
000283 FIRSTAX CIRS)
000283 FIRSTAX (IRS)
WALKER, CLAUDIA
DAVINDER, NAAN
GREEK EASTERN ORTHODOX
ROt/E, RUSSELL
RCH./E, RUSSELL
ARTHOFFER, DANNY
000127 CALIFORNIAN - LEGAL
000127 CALIFORNIAN - LEGAL
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
EXPERIENCE MODIFICATION
000444 CAIT
000444 CAIT
000444 CAIT
000444 CAIT
000444 CAIT
000444 CAIT
000444 CAIT
000444 CAIT
000444 SDI
000444 SOl
000444 SDI
000444 SDI
00(Y,44 SDI
000444 SDi
000444 SDI
000444 SDI
000444 SOl
00028~ FICA/MED
000283 FICA/MED
00028~ FICA/NED
000283 FICA/NED
000283 FICA/NED
00028~ FICA/MED
00028~ FICA/MED
000283 FICA/NED
000283 FICA/MED
000283 USlT
000283 USIT
000283 USIT
000283 USIT
000283 USlT
000283 USIT
000283 USIT
00028~ USIT
MILEAGE/WALKER, CLAUDIA
ASSESSMENT REFUND/DAVIN
REFUND/GREEK EASTERN CH
REFUND/RC~E RUSSELL
REFUND/ROWE RUSSELL
REFUND, ARTHOFFER
EASTER ADVERTISEMENT, F
2 X 4" AD - $6.62 COL I
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001 - 1990
001-2070
100-2070
190-2070
191-2070
193-2070
300-2070
320-2070
330-2070
001-2070
100-2070
190-2070
191-2070
192-2070
19~-2070
300-2070
320-2070
330-2070
001-2070
100-2070
190-2070
191-2070
192-2070
193-2070
300-2070
320-2070
330-2070
001-2070
100-2070
190-2070.
191-2070
193-2070
300-2070
320-2070
330-2070
190-180-999-5258
193-180-4064
001-163-4380
190-180-4005
191-180-4005
191-180-4005
190-180-999-5254
001-120-999-5254
ITEM
AMOUNT
6,6T2.90
2,431.22
431.23
420.28
19.80
37.31
19.89
52.62
15.59
953.74
191.88
241.20
6.94
9.85
23.18
9.47
19,35
22.57
2,243.39
427.98
540.36
15.48
21.98
51.70
21.15
43.18
50.34
9,672.22
2,021.11
1,996.90
78.75
202.92
86.89
237.55
101.59
35.00
119.83
50.00
572.30
41.06
795.47
158.88
52.96
PAGE 2
CHECK
AMOUNT
6,672.90
4,906.12
i7,813.49
35.00
119.83
50.00
613.36
795.47
211.84
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA
05127193 11:09 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIOOS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM
NUMBER DATE NUIqBER NAHE DESCRIPTION
10591 05127/93 000135 CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER SIGNS
10592 05/27/93 O00137 CHEVRON U.S.A. INC. FUEL/POLICE
10592 05/27/93 000137 CHEVRON U.S.A. INC. FUEL/TCSD
10592 05/27/93 000137 CHEVRON U.S.A. INC. FUEL/I~S
10592 05/27/93 000137 CHEVRON U.S.A./NC. FUEL/CN
10592 05/27/93 000137 CHEVRON U.S.A. INC. FUEL/TCSO
10593 05/27/93 000174 GET PAGED LOST UNIT
10594 05127193 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT SUPPLIES
10594 05/27/93 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT OPEN P.O. FOR TCSD:
10594 05/27/93 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES
OF
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
100-164-999-5244
001-170-~99-5262
190-180-99~-5263
310-162-~99-5214
001-110-999-5262
310-180-~9~-5214
190-180-999-5238
001-150-999-5220
190-180-9~9-5220
190-180-~{~-5220
10595 05127193 000184 GTE 909-699-2475 PH 001-103-999-5208
10596 05/27/93 000206 KINKO'S COPIES 2 REAMS 81/2 X 11
NISC. MAINTENANCE SUPPL
10597 05/27/93 000209 L & M FERTILIZER
10598 05/27/93 000210 LEAGUE OF CALIF.CITIES LAH HANDBOOKS
;N,~ 05/27/93 000220 NAURICE PRINTERS QUICK NEIGHBORNO(X) HATCH NEgS
05/27/93 000220 NAURICE PRINTERS QUICK TAX
330-199-999-5222
100-164-999-5218
001-110-999-5228
001-170-~-5222
001-170-~9-5222
10600 05127/93 000228 MOBIL FUEL/TCSD 190-180-~99-5263
10600 05/27/93 000228 MOBIL FUEL/CITY MANAGER 001-110-999-5263
10600 05/27/93 000228 MOBIL FUEL/PUBLIC HORKS 100-164-9~-5263
10600 05/27/93 000228 MOBIL FUEL/PLANNING 001-161-9~9-5262
10600 05/27/93 000228 MOBIL FUEL/CITY MANAGER 001-110-999-5262
10600 05/27/93 000228 MOBIL FUEL/PLANNING 001-161-~-5262
10600 05/27/93 000228 MOBIL FUEL/B&S 001-162-~99-5263
10600 05/27/93 000228 MOBIL FUEL/PUBLIC ta)RKS 100-164-~99-5263
10601 05/27/93 000233 NELSON, SHAHN REIMB/SN
TEMPORARY SERVICES TO P
TEMPORARY SERVICES TO P
TEMPORARY SERVICES TO P
TEMPORARY SERVICES TO P
TEMPORARY SERVICES TO P
TEMPORARY SERVICES TO P
TENPOBARY SERVICES TO P
FILM PROCESSING
10602 05127/93 000239
10602 05/27/93 000239
10602 05/27/93 000239
10602 05/27/93 000239
10602 05/27/93 000239
1060Z 05/27/93 000239
10602 05/27/93 000239
OLSTEN TEMPORARY SERVIC
OLSTEN TEMPORARY SERVZC
OLSTEN TEMPORARY SERVIC
OLSTEN TEMPORARY SERVIC
OLSTEN TEMPORARY SERVIC
OLSTEN TEMPORARY SERVIC
OLSTEN TEMPORARY SERVIC
000243 PAYLESS DRUG STORE
10603 05/27/93
10604 05127/93 000246
10604 05127/93 000246
10604 05/27/93 000246
10604 05/27/93 000246
10604 05/27/93 000246
PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM
PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM
PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM
PERS EMPLOYEES' RET/REM
PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM
000246 PER REDE
0002/,6 PER REDE
0002/,6 PERS RET
000246 PERS RET
000246 PERS RET
190-180-999-5258
001-166-999-5118
001-140-999-5118
001-163-999-5118
001-166-999-5118
001-163-999-5118
001-140-999-5118
001-163-999-5118
001-162-999-5222
001-2130
100-2130
001-2390
100-2390
190-2390
ITEM
AMOUNT
267.00
44.77
10.98
437.38
49.21
160.~
50.00
59.26
8.00
51.01
17.73
21.44
116.11
150.00
297.00
23.02
41.59
79.97
202.81
43.81
38.02
18.90
12.04
131.49
19.98
176.19
27.69
75.51
20.98
247.50
67.12
201.36
23.69
42.94
171.76
10,744.02
1,770.12
2,151.77
PAGE 3
CHECK
AMOUNT
267.00
703.33
50.00
118.27
17.73
21.44
116.11
150.00
320.02
568
19.98
816.35
23.69
VOUCHRE2
05/27/93
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
11:09
CHECK
DATE
VENDOR
NUMBER
VENDOR
NAME
CITY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
10604 05/27/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREN 000246 PERS RET
10604 05/27/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES~ RETIREM 000246 PERS RET
10604 05/27/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREN 000246 PERS RET
10604 05/27/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 PERS RET
10604 05/27/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES~ RETIREM 000266 PERS RET
10604 05/27/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREN 000266 PERS RET
10604 05/27/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 SURVIVOR
10604 05/27/93 000266 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000266 SURVIVOR
10604 05/27/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000266 SURVIVOR
10604 05/27/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES~ RETIREN 000266 SURVIVOR
1060~ 05/27/93 0002/,6 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREN 000246 SURVIVOR
10604 05/27/93 000266 PERS EMPLOYEES/ RETIREM 000266 SURVIVOR
10604 05/27/93 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 - SURVIVOR
10606 05/27/93 000266 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREN 000246 SURVIVOR
10604 05/27/93 000266 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000266 SURVIVOR
10605
10605
10605
10605
10605
10606
10606
10606
05/27/93
05/27/93
05/27/93
05/27/93
05/27/93
05/27/93
05/27/93
05/27/93
05/27/93
05/27/93
05/27/93
05/27/93
05/27/93
05/27/93
05/27/93
05/27/93
05/27/93
05/27/93
05/27/93
05/27/93
05/27/93
05/27/93
05/27/93
05/27/93
05/27/93
05/27/93
05/27/93
05/27/93
05/27/93
10607
10607
10607
10607
10607
10607
10607
10607
10607
10607
10607
10607
000253
000253
000253
000253
000253
000262
000262
000262
0002?7
0002?7
0002?7
0002?7
000277
000277
000277
0002?7
000277
0002?7
0002?7
0002?7
000308
000308
000308
000320
000320
000325
000325
000325
000325
10608
10608
10608
POSTMASTER
POSTMASTER
POSTMASTER
POSTMASTER
POSTMASTER
RANCHO WATER
RANCHO WATER
RANCHO WATER
S & S ARTS AND CRAFTS
S & S ARTS AND CRAFTS
S & S ARTS AND CRAFTS
S & S ARTS AND CRAFTS
S & S ARTS AND CRAFTS
S & S ARTS AND CRAFTS
S & S ARTS AND CRAFTS
S & S ARTS AND CRAFTS
S & S ARTS AND CRAFTS
S & S ARTS AND CRAFTS
S & S ARTS AND CRAFTS
S & S ARTS AND CRAFTS
TEMECULA TDUNE ASSOCIAT
TEMECULA TOUNE ASSOCIAT
TEMECULA TOt4NE ASSOCIAT
TOWN CENTER STATIONERS
TOWN CENTER STATIONERS
UNITED WAY OF THE INLAN
UNITED WAY OF THE INLAN
UNITED WAY OF THE INLAN
UNITED WAY OF THE INLAN
10609
10609
10610
10610
10610
10610
POSTAGE/CC
POSTAGE/PLAN
POSTAGE/FINANCE
POSTAGE/PU
POSTAGE/TCSD
5/19/93 BILLING
5/19/93 BILLING
5/19/93 BILLING
BK-316 CRAFTERS HANDBOO
SG-530 BUTTERFLY COLLEC
GP-769 PIZZAZ PAPER JEW
PE-121 WHITE KRAFT PAPE
PE-333 CRITTERS II
PE-334 CRITTERS IV
PE-78 NATURE PRINT PAPE
CLJ-70 FINO BASIC SET I
ELMER'S INVISIBLE GLUE
SH-41 DELUXE PUMPKIN CA
FREIGHT
TAX
LOCKER RENTAL AT TO~N
SET UP AND CLEANING FOR
FLOOR CARE FOR CITY COU
OFFICE SUPPLIES
CREDIT ERASERS
000325 t~
000325 U~
000325 L~
000325 IJ~
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
191-Z390
192-2390
193-;Z:390
300-2390
320-2390
330-Z390
001-2.390
100-2390
190-2390
191-2~90
192-2390
193-2390
300-2390
320-2390
330-2390
001-120-999-5230
001-161-999-5230
001-160-999-5230
001-163-999-5230
190-180-999-5230
191-180-999-5240
193-180-999-5240
190-180-999-5260
190-181-999-5300
190-181-999-5300
190-181-999-5300
190-181-999-5300
190-181-999-5300
190-181-999-5300
190-181-999-5300
190-181-999-5300
190-181-999-5300
190-181-999-5300
190-181-999-5300
190-181-999-5300
190-180-999-5238
001-100-999-5234
001-100-999-5234
001-163-999-5220
001-163-999-5220
001-2120
100-2120
190-2120
300-2120
ITEM
AMOUNT
76.98
96.85
255.08
98.65
219,15
218.07
48.62
8.58
12.09
.42
,93
1.6~
.66
.93
1.86
13.95
15.95
24.50
23.90
13.95
85.91
2,961.85
389.35
3.99
25.18
14.99
59.95
5.50
5.50
15.00
17.75
3.49
12.95
25.10
12,73
15.00
135.00
96.00
58.33
4.85-
?7.25
9.25
17.50
.50
PAGE
CHECK
AMOUNT
15,920.72
92.25
3,437.11
202.13
266,00
53.48
104.50
VOUCHRE2
05/27/93 11: 09
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR
NUMBER DATE NUMBER
10611 05127/93 000326
10611 05/27/93 000326
10611 05/27/93 000326
10612 05127/93 000~0
10612 05/27/93 000340
10613 05/27/93 000358
VENDOR
NAME
UNZTOG RENTAL SERVICE
UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE
UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE
gHITE CAP
gHITE CAP
DZXOR, DAVID F.
CITY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REG]STER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
Z-SETS OF UNIFORMS; CLE
2-SETS OF UNIFORMS; CLE
UNIFORM RENTAL
TOOLS
TOOLS
REIMB/INTN'L CONF OF SH
10614 05127/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 4/12-5/12
10614 05/27193 000374 SOOTNERN CALIF EDISON 4/12-5/12
10614 05/27/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 4/12-5/12
10614 05/27/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 4/12-5/11
10614 05/27/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 4/12-5/11
10614 05/27/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 4/12-5/11
10614 05/27/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 4/12-5/11
10614 05/27/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 4/12-5/12
10614 05/27/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 4/12-5/11
10614 05/27/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
10614 05/27/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 4/13-5/12
10614 05/27/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 4/13-5/12
10614 05/27/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 4/13-5/12
ld 05/27/93 000388 ICBO PUBLICATIONS
10616 05/27/93 000389 USCM
10616 05/27/93 000389 USCH
10616 05/27/93 000389 USCM
10617 05/27/93 000414
10618 05/27/93 000426
10618 05/27/93 000426
10618 05/27/93 000426
10619 05/27/93 000428
10620 05/27/93 000451
10621 05127/93 000545
LONGS DRUG STORE
RANCHO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL
RANCHO/NDUSTR]AL SUPPL
RANCHO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL
000389 PT RETZR
000389 PT RETIR
000389 PT RETIR
FILM PROCESSING
CITY HALL; CLEANING SUP
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
CREDIT MEMO/FOOTING ERR
HORIZON WATER gATER CHG
KING ONE K-9
10622 05/27/93 000554
10622 05/27/93 000554
10632 05/27/93 000554
10623 05/27/93 000596
10624 05/27/93 000603
10625 05/27/93 000679
10625 05/27/93 000679
PAC TEL CELLULAR - S,D,
SMITH BROS. TEAM SPORTS
SMITH BROS. TEAM SPORTS
SMITH BROS. TEAM SPORTS
LEAGUE OF CA CITIES/LAF
80~ CONTRACT CLASS DOG
SD-1075255/MJ
STAFF/StJIM PROGRAM
FRE I GHT
TAX
WORKSHOP/LR
CABLE & WIRELESS CONNUN APRIL 16-NAY 15
BO-GRAPHICS #10 MHITE ENVELOPES
BO-GRAPHZCS TAX
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
100-164-999-5243
100-164-999-5243
190-180-999-5243
100-16/*-999-5218
100-164-999-5218
001-110-999-5258
191-180-999-5500
191-180-999-5500
191-180-999-5500
193-180-999-5240
193-180-999-5240
193-180-999-52/*0
193-180-999-5240
193-180-999-52/.0
193-180-999-52/.0
193-180-999-5240
193-180-999-5240
193-180-999-5240
190-180-999-52/*0
001-162-999-5228
001-2160
100-2160
190-2160
190-180-999-5220
001-199-999-5212
190-180-999-5212
190-180-999-5212
190-182-999-5240
190-183-816-5300
001-140-999-5208
190-180-999-5243
190-180-999-5243
190-180-999-5243
001-150-999-5258
320-199-999-5208
190-180-999-5525
190-180-999-5525
ITEM
AMOUNT
15.20
12.50
13.60
290.19
132.86
93.21
111.48
123.66
164.49
12.47
12.47
12.47
13.04
14.05
12./,7
12.47
12.47
12.47
12.47
16.23
92.24
132.00
241.22
19.49
326.47
13.33
.12-
59.70
468. O0
96.40
559.50
4.94
43.36
115.00
1,589.59
5O4.64
39.11
PAGE 5
CHECK
AMOUNT
41.30
423.05
93.21
526.48
16.23
/*65.46
19.49
339.68
59.70
468. O0
96.40
607.80
115.00
1,589.59
543.75
VOUCHRE2
05/27/93 11: 09
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR
NUMBER DATE NUMBER
10626 05/27/93 00070~
10626 05/27/93 000704
10626 05/27/93 000704
10626 05/27/93 000704
10627 05/27/95 000738
10627 05/27/93 000738
10628 05/27/93 000745
10629 05/27/93
10629 05/27/93
10630 05/27/93 000837
10631 05/27/95 000850
10(:32 05/27/93 000860
10633 05/27/93
10633 05/27/93
10634 05/27/93
10634 05/27/93
10635 05/27/93
10636 05/27/93
10637 05/27/93
10638 05/27/93
10639 05/27/93
10639 05/27/93
10639 05/27/93
106~0 05/27/93
10641 05/27/93 000971
10642 05/27/93 000980
10642 05/27/93 000980
10642 05/27/93 000980
10643 05/27/93 000981
10643 05127193 000981
10643 05/27/93 000981
10643 05/27/93 000981
10643 05/27/93 000981
VENDOR
NAME
SKS, INC,/INLAND OIL
SKS, INC,/INLAND OIL
SKS, INC,/iNLAND OIL
SKS, ]NC,/INLAND OIL
R.F. CONNUNICATZON SPEC
R.F. COMMUNICATION SPEC
AT & T - CELLULAR
000836 RANCHO MUFFLER
000836 RANCHO MUFFLER
STATE OF CALZFORN]A,
A.E.P.
J~H~, LOR]
000889 PACIFIC IRRIGATION SUPP
000889 PACIFIC IRRIGATION SUPP
000905 TEMECULA SHUTTLE SERV]C
000905 TEMECULA SHUTTLE SERVIC
000907 TEMECULA CAR WASH
000916 BANK OF AMERICA - CC
000938 FOXBRIAR FARMS
000943 GRAYNOR ENGINEERING
000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C
000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C
000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C
000958 ROBERT CARAN PRODUCTION
CALIFORNIA ENERGY CONMI
COAST IRRZGATION SUPPLY
COAST IRRIGATION SUPPLY
COAST IRRIGATION SUPPLY
R.H.F. INC
R,H.F. INC
R.H.F. INC
R.H.F. INC
R.H,F, INC
CZTY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
iTEM
DESCRIPTION
FUEL/C/TY MANAGER
FUEL/B&S
FUEL/PUBLIC WORKS
FUEL/TCSD
REPAIR ANO RECERTIFICAT
FREIGHT
619-987-1828 NJ
TOW STRAPS WITH HOOKS,
TAX
000837 FRAN TAX
RENEWAL
80X CONTRACT CLASS/KINO
IT-102 NIS CHEClO4ATE II
TAX
SHUTTLE/MUNOZ
SHUTTLE/MUNOZ
OIL CHANGES AND CAR WAS
4798020000010799/JG
80X CONTRACT CLASS/HORS
CONSULTING ON BANNER PO
MISC. BLUEPRINTS, ETC.
PRINTING/TCSD
PRINTiNG/PLAN
DESIGN AND CONDUCT JULY
PUBLICATIONS
IRRIGATION SUPPLIES
IRRIGATION SUPPLIES
IRRIGATION SUPPLIES
ASSY., CABLE POWER CABL
LABOR, 1 HOUR
RECERTIFICATION OF RADA
FREIGHT
TAX
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-110-~-5263
001-162-999-5263
100-164-~99-5263
190-180-999-5263
001-170-~-5215
001-170-~-5215
001-140-~9-5208
100-164-999-5242
100-164-999-5242
100-2140
001-161-~-5226
190-183-841-5300
190-180-999-5242
190-180-999-5242
001-100-999-5258
001-100-~99-5258
310-180-999-5214
001-120-999-5258
190-183-818-5300
100-164-~-5248
001-163-999-5268
190-180-999-5268
001-161-999-5250
190-180-~99-5250
001-161-~9-5228
190-180-~99-5212
190-180-999-5212
190-180-~99-5212
001-170-999-5215
001-170-999-5215
001-170-~99-5215
001-170-999-5215
001-170-999-5215
l TEM
AMOUNT
69.67
40.72
253.63
101.14
80.00
8.00
4.12
170.00
13.18
12.93
60. O0
168.00
297.08
23.02
40. O0
46. O0
18.73
139.46
320. O0
460. O0
139.27
62.06
7.00
10,000.00
65.95
393.29
53.34
45.56
45.45
45. O0
35.00
9.00
3.30
PAGE 6
CHECK
AMOUNT
465.16
88.00
4.12
183.18
12.93
60.00
168.00
320.10
86.00
18.73
139.46
320.00
460.00
208.33
10,000.00
65.95
492.19
137.75
VOUCHRE2 CiTY OF TEHECIJLA
05127193 11:09
~, VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ZTEN
NUNBER DATE NUNBER NANE DESCRIPTION
10644 05/27193 000982 BOIlSALL PETROLEUN CONST THREE DAYS LOADER TINE
10645 05/27/93 001002 FIRST INTERSTATE BANK o REINB/NJ
10645 05/27/93 001002 FIRST/NTERSTATE BANK - 5473&&&403910149/TS
10646 05/27/93 O01O04 DEPARTNENT OF FISH & GA EXTENSION AGREENENT
10647 05127/93 001005 PADGETT-TNONPSON SENINAR/DL
ACCOUNT
NUNBER
100'164'999-5402
001"140-~-5258
001'163-999-5258
210'190-120-5802
001'150-~-5258
ITEN
ANOUNT
800.00
34.47
156.85
109.00
125.00
PAGE 7
CHECK
AMOUNT
800.00
191.32
109.00
125.00
TOTAL CHECKS
74,327.11
VOUCHRE2
05/20/~J
11:02
CITY OF TEHECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE ?
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
100 GAS TAX FUND
190 COIeqUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
192. TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
250 CAPITAL PROJECTS - TCSD
280 REDEVELOPNENT AGENCY - CIP
300 INSURANCE FUND
310 VEHICLES FUND
320 %NFORNATION SYSTENS
330 COPY CENTER FUND
TOTAL
ANOUNT
30,896.63
1,560.68
10,361.22
2,035.23
26,179.56
759.94
z~,1.57
250.00
38.05
4.00
2,326.09
100.00
74,932.97
VOUCHRE2
05/20/93
~-
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
10525
10526
10530
10531
10531
10532
10532
10532
10532
10532
10532
1053Z
10532
10532
10532
10533
10'J~5
10535
10535
10535
10535
10535
10535
10536
10536
10536
10536
10536
10536
10536
10536
10537
10537
10538
10539
10539
10539
10540
11:02
CHECK
DATE
05/14/93
05/18/93
05/20/93
05/20/93
05/20/93
05/20/93
05/20/9~
05/20/93
05/20/93
05/20/93
05/20/93
05/20/93
05/20/93
05/20/93
05/20/93
05/20/93
05/20/93
05/20/93
05/20/93
05/20/93
05/20/93
05/Z0/93
05/20/93
05/20/93
05/20/93
05/20/93
05/20/93
05/20/93
05/20/93
05/20/93
05/20/93
05/20/93
05/20/93
05/20/93
05/20/93
05/20/93
05/20/93
05/20/93
05/20/93
VENDOR
NUMBER
OOO74O
000995
000120
000127
000127
000174
000174
000174
000174
000174
000174
000174
000174
000174
000174
000177'
000186
000192
000192
000192
000192
000192
000192
000192
000194
000194
000194
000194
000194
000194
000194
000194
000209
000209
000214
000239
000239
000239
000243
VENDOR
NAME
PICCA DELl
INLAND EMPIRE DESIGN IN
BICKNELL TRAVEL CENTER
CALIFORN]AN- LEGAL
CALIFORNIAN - LEGAL
GET PAGED
GET PAGED
GET PAGED
GET PAGED
GET PAGED
GET PAGED
GET PAGED
GET PAGED
GET PAGED
GET PAGED
GLENNIES OFFICE PROOUCT
HANKS HARDMARE
GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE
GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE
GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE
GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE
GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE
GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE
GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE
ICNA RETIREMENT
ICMA RETIREMENT
ICMA RETIREMENT
ICMA RETIREMENT
]CMA RETIREMENT
ICNA RETIREMENT
IrMA RETIREMENT
ICNA RETIREMENT
L & N FERTILIZER
L & M FERTILIZER
LUNCH & STUFF CATERING
OLSTEN TEMPORARY SERVZC
OLSTEN TEMPORARY SERVIC
OLSTEN TEMPORARY SERVIC
PAYLESS DRUG STORE
CITY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIDOS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
BENEFIT LUNCH
AWARDS PRESENTATION OLD
AIRFARE/MJM/CA LEGISLAT
TO10307T2/1662TA/281TF/
TOOO192T4/2787TC/1695Tj
B&S PAGERS/JUNE
TM:) PAGERS FOR TRAFFZC
TkK) PAGERS FOR TRAFFIC
TWO PAGERS FOR TRAFFIC
PAGER FOR POLICE DEPT.
PAGER FOR STUART NANOUS
PAGERS; PUBLIC WORKS DE
NONTHLY PAGER RENTAL
PAGER FOR RON ROBERTS,
TOM HAFELI PAGER RENTAL
OFFICE SUPPLIES
NISC HARDMARE
C2787 LASERJET lllsf TO
C~612 GLOBAL DG-90N 4~N
FRE I GHT
TAX
VERBATIM 4NN DLgON
TAX
CRED I T
INSURANCE PREM / NAY 19
INSURANCE PREN / NAy 19
INSURANCE PREN / NAY'19
INSURANCE PREM / NAy 19
INSURANCE PREM / NAy 19
INSURANCE PREM / NAY 19
INSURANCE PREM / NAY 19
INSURANCE PREM / NAY 19
TRIMMERS 25CC & HEDGETR
LOOP HNADLE TRIMMER
CATERING CITY COUNCIL
TEMPORARY SERVICES TO P
TEMPORARY SERVICES TO P
TEMPORARY SERVICES TO P
FILM PROCESSING SERVICE
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-150-999-5260
001-161-999-5260
001~140-999-5258
001-120-999-5256
001-161-999-5256
001 - 162-999-5238
001 - lr0-999-5242
001-140-999-5250
100-164-999-5238
001 - 170-999-5242
100-164-999-5238
100-164-999-52]8
190-180-999-5238
001 - 100-999-5250
320-199-999-5238
190-180-999-5220
001-199-999-5242
320-199-999-5221
320-199-999-5221
320-199-999-5221
320-199-~99-5221
320-199-999-5221
320-199-999-5221
320-199-999-5221
001-2080
100-2080
190-2080
191-2080
193-2080
300-2080
320-2080
330-2080
100-164-999-5242
100-164-999-5218
001-100-999-5260
001-166-999-5118
001-140-999-5118
001-163-999-5118
190-180-999-5250
ITEM
AMOUNT
138.00
70.00
141.00
130.87
138.58
33. O0
7.33
7.33
7.34
11.00
11.00
~4.00
88.00
11.00
11.00
48.8~
132.92
549.95
168.50
16.55
56.39
161.91
12,55
181.55-
9,208.77
1,025.68
1,428.64
62.38
76.24
38.05
562.02
100.00
28].71
41.17
127.00
33.57
29.36
199.68
19.56
PAGE 2
CHECK
AMOUNT
138.00
70.00
141.00
269.45
231.00
132.92
71~.30
12,501.78
324.88
127.00
262.61
19.56
VOUCHRE2
05/20/93
11:02
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME
10541
10541
10541
10541
10541
10541
10541
10541
10541
10541
10541
10541
10541
10541
10541
10542
10542
10542
10542
10542
10543
10544
10545
10545
10546
10547
10547
10548
10548
10548
10548
10548
10548
10548
10548
10548
10548
10548
10548
10548
10548
10548
10548
10548
05/20/93 000249 PETTY CASH
05/20/93 000249 PETTY CASH
05/20/93 000249 PETTY CASH
05/20/93 000249 PETTY CASH
05/20/93 000249 PETTY CASH
05/20/93 000249 PETTY CASH
05/20/93 000249 PETTY CASH
05/20/93 000249 PETTY CASH
05/20/93 000249 PETTY CASH
05/20/93 000249 PETTY CASH
05/20/93 000249 PETTY CASH
05/20/93 000249 PETTY CASH
05/20/93 000249 PETTY CASH
05/20/93 000249 PETTY CASH
05/20/93 000249 PETTY CASH
05/20/93 000253 POSTMASTER
05/20/93 000253 POSTMASTER
05/20/93 000253 POSTMASTER
05/20/93 000253 POSTMASTER
05/20/93 000253 POSTMASTER
05/20/93 000262 RANCNO WATER
05/20/93 000278 SAN DIEGO UNION TRIBUNE
05/20/93 000307 TEMECULA TROPHY
05/20/93 000307 TEMECULA TROPHY
05/20/93 000309 TEMECULA COPIERS
05/20/93 000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE
05/20/93 000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE
05/20/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
05/20/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
05/20/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
05/20/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EOISON
05/20/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EOISON
05/20/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALiF EDISON
05/20/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EOISON
05/20/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EOISON
05/20/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
05/20/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EOISON
05/20/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
05/20/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
05/20/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
05/20/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALiF EDISON
05/20/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EOISON
05/20/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF BISON
05/20/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
CiTY OF TEMEOULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH/TCSD
PETTY CASH/TCSD
PETTY CA, SH/TCSD
PETTY CASH/TCSD
PETTY CASH/TCSD
MAIL/CC
MAIL/FIN
MAIL/PLAN
NAIL/TCSD
NAIL/PW
LANDSCAPE WATER BILLS
OPEN P.O. FOR JOB ANNOU
AWARD TROPHIES
AWARD TROPHIES
COPIES
2-SETS OF UNIFORMS; CLE
UNIFORM RENTAL
03/31/93-04/30/93
04/01/93-04/30/93
0~/01/93-04/30/93
03/03/93-03/31/93
03/31/93-05/03/93
0~/01/93-05/03/93
0~/05/93-05/05/93
04/05/93-05/04/93
04/05/93-05/0~/93
04/05/93-05/05/93
04/05/93-05/05/93
04/05/93-04/05/93
04/05/93-05/05/93
0~/06/93-05/05/93
0~/06/93-05/05/93
04/06/93-05/05/93
O4/07/93-05/06/93
ACCOUNT
NLINBER
001-100-999-5260
001-110-999-5260
001-120-999-5220
001-150-999-5260
001-161-999-5258
001-161-999-5260
001-161-999-5220
001-163-999-5258
001-163-999-5260
100-164-999-5214
190-180-999-5220
190-180-999-5226
190-180-999-5300
190-180-999-5300
190-182-999-5300
001-120-999-5230
001-140-999-5230
001-161-999-5230
190-180-999-5230
001-16~-999-5230
193-180-999-5240
001-150-999-5254
190-182-999-5300
190-182-999-5300
001 - 171-999-5217
100-164-999-5243
190-180-999-5243
191-180-999-5500
190-180-999-5240
190-180-999-5240
191-180-999-5500
191-180-999-5500
191-180-999-5500
193-180-999-5240
193-180-999-5240
193-180-999-5240
193-180-999-5240
193-180-999-5240
193-180-999-5240
193-180-999-5240
190-180-999-5240
193-180-999-5240
193-180-999-5240
191-180-999-5500
ITEM
AMOUNT
25.00
12.89
71.55
18.21
17.98
18.48
5.38
10.52
27.23
8.93
16.16
28. O0
13,98.
51.99
10.78
27.90
59.75
23.90
19.90
219.00
4?7.23
275.28
14.57
25.86
75.00
12.50
13.60
156.76
12.57
12,57
42.28
130.95
158.73
12.90
12.81
12.47
12.90
12.90
16.82
12.90
12.47
12.47
12.47
132.13
PAGE 3
CHECK
AMOUNT
337.08
350.45
477.2
275.28
40.43
75.00
26.10
VOUCHRE2
05/20/93
11:02
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR
NUMBER DATE NUMBER
10548 05/20/93 000374
10548 05/20/93 000374
10548 05/20/93 000374
10548 05/20/93 000374
10548 05/20/93 000374
, 10548 05/20/93 000374
10548 05/20/93 000374
10548 05/20/93 000374
10548 05/20/93 000374
10548 05/20/93 000374
10548 05/20/93 000374
10548 05/20/93 000374
10548 05/20/93 000374
105/,8 05/20/93 000374
10548 05/20/93 000374
10548 05/20/93 000374
10548 05/20/93 000374
10548 05/20/93 000374
10548 05/20/93 000374
10549 05/20/93 000375
10549 05/20/93 000375
1 ' 05/20/93 000377
10551 05/20/93 000386
10551 05/20/93 000386
10551 05/20/93 000386
10552 05/20/93 000408
10553 05120193 000414
10554 05/20/93 000463
10555 05/20/93 000492
VENDOR
NAME
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN PALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN PALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN PALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN PALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN PALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN PALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN PALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CAL]F EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN PALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN PALIF TELEPHOR
SOUTHERN PALIF TELEPHON
STATE DEPT, OF TRANSPOR
LANZER VOICE PRODUCTS
LANIER VOICE PRODUCTS
LANIER VOICE PRODUCTS
AGRICREDIT ACCEPTANCE C
LONGS DRUG STORE
POLLARD, DONALD E.
MCLARNEY, MARY JANE
10556 05/20/93 000499 SCCCA
10557 05/20/93 000512
10558 05/20/93 000537
10558 05/20/93.000537
10558 05/20/93 000537
10558 05/20/93 000537
10558 05/20/93 000537
10558 05/20/93 000537
10558 05/20/93 000537
10558 05/20/93 000537
10558 05/20/93 000537
10558 05/20/93 000537
CADET UNIFORM
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDZ
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED]
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
04107193-05107193
04107193-05/07193
04/07/93-05/07193
0410~1~ - 05107/93
04109193 - 05107193
04/09/93 - 05/07/93
04/09/93-05/07/93
03/12/93-04/13/93
03/23/93-04/22/93
03/23/93-04/22/93
03/23/93-04/22/93
03/23/93-04/22/93
03/23/93-04/22/93
03/23/93-04/22/93
01/22/93-02/19/93
02/19/93-03/23/93
03/23/93-04/22/93
03123193-04122193
03/23/93-04/22/93
9092024751
909-202-4752
BILLING PERIOD MARCH 19
LEADERLESS TAPES
FREIGHT
TAX
TRACTOR LEASE
FILM PURCHASING
COUNTRY MESTERN DANCE C
EXPENSE REIMB/MJ
CITY CLERK'S ASSOC MEET
ENTRY RUG SERVICE; CiTY
3/31-4/30
3/31-4/30
2/Z8-3/31
3/31-4/30
3/31-4/30
4/01-4/30
3/31-4/30
3/31-4/30
3/31-4/30
3/31-4/30
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
190-180-999-5240
193-180-999-5240
193-180-999-5240
193-180-999-5240
193-180-999-5240
193 - 180- 999- 5240
193-180-999-5240
193-180-999-5240
001-199-999-5240
001 - 199-999-5240
001 - 199-999-5240
001 - 199- 999- 5240
001-199-999-5240
001-199-999-5240
001 - 199-999-5240
001-199-999-5240
001-199-999-5240
001 - 199-999-5240
001 - 199-999- 5240
001 - 163 -999-5208
190-180-999-5208
100-164-999-5405
001-161-999-5220
001-161-999-5220
001-161-999-5220
190-180-999-5239
190-180-999-5220
190-183-834-5300
001-140-999-5258
001-120-999-5258
001-199-999-5250
191-180-999-5500
191-180-999-5500
191-180-999-5500
191-180-999-5500
191-180-999-5500
191-180-999-5500
191-180-999-5500
191-180-999-5500
191-180-999-5500
191-180-999-5500
ITEM
AII4IXINT
13.24
12.90
12.90
12.04
12.04
12.04
12.04
13.87
452.71
811.69
732.53
186.61
151.37
127.56
125.39
405.60
74.82
122.54
106.35
78.00
2.40
6.24
846.02
21.00
~0.00
19.00
25. O0
34.25
36.19
42.03
17.80
18.91
18.47
8.76
35.90
39.08
39.138
41.02
PAGE 4
CHECK
AMOUNT
4,117.43
197.36
106.35
86.64
846.02
21.00
/,40.00
19.00
25.00
34.25
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA
05/20/9~ 11:02 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION
10558 05/20/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI 3/31-6/30
10558 05/20/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI 3/~1-4/30
10558 05/20/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI 3/31-4/30
10558 05/20/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI 3/31-4/30
10558 05/20/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED! 0~/01/93-0~/30/93
10558 05/20/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED[ 7/01-3/31 ~J,
10558 05/20/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI 3/31-4/30
10558 05/20/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDZ 3/31-4/30
10558 05/20/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI 3/31-4/30
10558 05/20/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI 3/31-4/30
10558 05/20/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORN[A EDZ 3/31-4/30
10558 05/20/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI 3/31-4/30
10558 05/20/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALiFORNiA ED] 3/31-4/30
10558 05/20/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED! 1/31-2/28
10558 05/20/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI 2/28-3/31
10558 05/20/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI 3/31-4/30
10558 05/20/93 000537 SCXJTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI 3/31-4/30
10558 05/20/93 000537 SOUTHERN CAL/FORNIA ED] 3/31-4/30
10559 05/20/93 000596 LEAGUE OF CA CITIES/LAF CONFERENCE
10560 05/20/93 000619 JANAR TECHNOLOGIES, INC BATTERY CHARGER SINGLE
10560 05/20/93 000619 JANAR TECHNOLOGIES, INC FREIGHT
10560 05/20/93 000619 JAHAR TECHNOLOGIES, INC TAX
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
191-180-~-5500
191-180-~-5500
191-180-~-5500
191-180-~-5500
192-180-~-5500
192-180-~-5500
191-180-~-5500
191-180-~-5500
191-180-~-5500
191-180-~-5500
191-180-~-5500
191-180-~-5500
191-180-~-5500
191-180-~-5500
191-180-~-5500
191-180-~-5500
191-180-~-5500
191-180-999-5500
001-161-999-5258
001-163-~-5242
001-163-~-5242
O01-163-~q~-5242
10561 05/20/93 000648 BANANA BLUEPRINT FINANCE CHARGES 250-190-129-5802
10561 05/20/93 000648 BANANA BLUEPRINT COPIES FOR CRC 250-190-129-5802
10561 05/20/93 000648 BANANA BLUEPRINT BLUELINE & DELIVERY 250-190-129-5802
10561 05/20/93 000648 BANANA BLUEPRINT DELIVERY CHARGES ONLY 250-190-129-5802
10561 05/20/93 000648 BANANA BLUEPRINT DELIVERY CHARGES 250-190-129-5802
10561 05/20/93 000648 BANANA BLUEPRINT DELIVERY CHARGES 250-190-129-5802
10562 05/20/93 000649 MUNOZ, SAL J. EXPENSE REIMB/SM
10563 05/20/93 000718 NRPA
RESOURCE MATERIAL
10564 05/20/93 000746 CENTER FOR URBAN POLICY THE NEU ILLUSTRATED BOO
10564 05/20/93 000746 CENTER FOR URBAN POLICY FREIGHT
10565 05/20/93 000753 LANDSCAPE STRUCTURES, I 260-00007 TIRE SUING T!
10565 05/20/93 000753 LANDSCAPE STRUCTURES, I FREIGHT
10565 05120193 000753 LANDSCAPE STRUCTURES, I TAX
10566 05/20/93 000754
ASSIST IN THE DRAFTING
ELLIOTT GROUP, THE
001-100-~-5258
190-180-~-5228
001-161-~-5228
001-161-~-5228
190-180-~-5212
190-180-~-5212
190-180-~-5212
190-180-~-5250
10567 05/20/93 0007~3 SCANTRON CORPORATION CUSTOM FORM (ORE SIDED) 320-1970
10567 05/20/93 000793 SCANTRON CORPORATION PRINTING (5,000) FORMS 320-199-999-5221
10567 05/20/93 000793 SCANTRON CORPORATION FREIGHT 320-199-999-5221
10567 05/20/93 000793 SCANTRON CORPORATZON TAX 320-1970
10567 05/20/93 000793 SCANTRON CORPORATION TAX 320-1~-~-5221
ITEM
AMOUNT
38.85
39.56
41.80
33.18
15,289.70
10,889.86
36.13
34.89
37.42
129.86
32.29
26.80
38.08
~4~.07
24.86
25,81
38.50
32.66
135.00
43.00
5.00
3.33
142.59
203.20
21.71
28.82
28.82
16.43
9.00
30.25
24.95
2.50
150.00
1.50
11.63
79.00
307.20
579,25
13.62
60.43
8.27
PAGE 5
CHECK
AMOUNT
27,531.56
135.00
51.33~ '
441.57
9.00
30,25
27.45
163.13
79.00
968.77
VOUCHRE2
05/20/93 11:02
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR
NUMBER DATE NUMBER
10568 05/20/93 000907
10569 05/20/93 000910
10569 05/20/93
10570 05/20/93 000916
10571 05/20/93 000919
10572 05/20/93 00094.1
10572 05/20/93 000941
10573 05/20/93 000954.
10573 05/20/93 000954
10573 05/20/93 000954.
10574 05/20/93 000957
10573 05/20/93 000980
10576 05/20/93 000994
1P"'~ 05/20/93 000996
1d),-8 05/20/93 000~7
10579 05/20/93 000998
VENDOR
MANE
TEMECULA CAR gASH
MARY MITCHELL TRUST, TH
000910 MARY MITCHELL TRUST, TH
SANK OF AMERICA - CC
TEMEOULA VALLEY UNIFIED
FABCO
FABCO
FIRST INTERSTATE BANK
FIRST INTERSTATE SANK
FIRST INTERSTATE SANK
TEMECULA VALLEY FILM
COAST IRRIOATIOR SUPPLY
FRIENDS OF THE TEMECULA
LOCAL GOVERNMENT PUBLIC
RANCHO CALIFORNIA/TENEC
TENECULA VLLY NAT'L LIT
CITY OF TEMEOULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCR I PT I OR
CAR gASH
CREDIT NENEO
MAY & JUNE RENT/TEEN CE
4.798020000010807 RP CRE
COMMUNITY SERVICE FUNDI
,080 ALUMINUM SHELF
TAX
54.736664.03910024.-DD APR
54.T3666/,O3910024.oDD APR
54.7'J&664039100/,0 PB APR
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
310-164-999-5214.
190-182-999-5~
190-182-999-5234
001-100-999-5260
001-100-999-5267
001-171-999-524.2
001-171-999-524.2
001-110-999-5258
001-110-999-5260
001-100-999-5258
PREPARATION OF A PRODUC 280-199-999-5264
TkK) TORO 360S & NOZZLES
CS FUNDING
1993 SUPPLEMENT
CS FUNDING
CS FUNDING
190-180-999-5212
001-100-999-5267
001-100-999-5228
001-100-999-5267
001-100-999-5267
TOTAL CHECKS
ITEM
AMOUNT
168.75-
6,918.65
53.90
1,000. O0
93.90
7.28
268.81
102.20
281.54
250.00
2,000.00
10,000.00
2,000.00
PAGE 6
CHECK
AMOUNT
4..00
6,74.9.90
53.90
1,000. O0
101.18
652.55
250. O0
78.66
2,000. O0
10,000,00
2,000.00
74.,932.97
ITEM NO.
4
APPROVAL
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
Mary Jane McLarney, Finance Officer
June 8, 1993
City Treasurer's Report as of April 30, 1993
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive and file the City Treasurer's
report as of April 30, 1993.
DISCUSSION: Reports to the City Council regarding the City's investment
portfolio and receipts, disbursements and fund balance are required by Government
Code Sections 53646 and 41004 respectively. The City's investment portfolio is in
compliance with the Code Sections as of April 30, 1993.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
ATTACHMENT:
City Treasurer's Report as of April 30, 1993
City of Temecula
City Treasurer's Report
As of April 30, 1993
Cash Activity for the Month of April:
Cash and Investments as of April 1, 1993
Cash Receipts
Cash Disbursements
Cash and Investments as of April 30, 1993
$ 41,416,193
2,523,757
(4,270,133)
$ 39,669,817
Cash and Investments Portfolio:
Type of Investment Institution Yield
! Cash City Hall
u,~neral Checking First Interstate
Interest Checking Bank of America 2.500%
Benefit demand deposits First Interstate
Benefit demand deposits Bank of America 1.100%
Local Agency Investment Fund State Treasurer 4.605%
Deferred Comp. Fund ICMA
Trust accounts-TCSD bonds Bank of America 2.762%
Trust accounts-RDA bonds Bank of America 2.762%
Balance
$ 800
:>~505
26,517
9,147
160
17,295,657
320,173
4,577,621
17,217,237
$ 39,669,817
(1)
(1)
(1)
(1)
(1)-This amount includes outstanding checks.
Per Government Code Requirements, this Treasurer's Report is in compliance with
the City of Temecula's Investment Policy and there are adequate funds available
to meet budgeted and actual expenditures for the next thirty days of the City
of Temecula.
Prepared by Carole Serfling, Senior Accountant
ITEM
NO.
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
Mary Jane McLarney, Finance Officer
June 8, 1993
Budget Adjustments for Microfilm
Internal Service Fund
Equipment and
Jnsurance
Prepared by:
Grant M. Yates, Financial Services Administrator
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve:
A residual equity transfer of $69,520.00 from General Fund Undesignated Fund
Balance to the Copy Center Internal Service Fund for the purchase of microfilm
reproductive equipment.
Appropriate $40,000 from Insurance Internal Service Fund Balance to Account
No. 300-199-999-5207 Claims.
DISCUSSION: Microfilm Eouioment: On May 25, 1993 the City Council
approved the acquisition of microfilm reproductive equipment from Burtronics Business
Systems. The Council also directed staff to further investigate leasing versus
purchasing the equipment. The direction provid. ed was to find the most cost effective
financing method. Based upon the fact that the City is earning approximately a
4.605% return on our investments and the leasing rates were approaching 9%, staff
is recommending that the City purchase this equipment· The purchase price of the
equipment is $62,827.75 plus sales tax of $4,869.14, plus installation charges of
$1,400 and $500 for delivery charges brings a total cost of $69,596.91.
This residual equity transfer is requested to make the funds available in the Copy
Center Internal Service Fund to pay for the purchase of the equipment.
Insurance Fund: A transfer of $40,000 is requested from the InsUrance Internal
Service Fund Balance into account number 300-199-999-5207, Claims. All costs
associated with claims made against the City are recorded in this account. The costs
associated with various lawsuits, including Lake Village vs. City of Temecula, and
Moddafare vs. The City of Temecula, could not be determined at mid-year, therefore
this transfer from fund balance is requested.
ITEM NO. 6
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
June S. Greek, City Clerk
June 8, 1993
Resolution Designating Agent for Obtaining Federal Assistance
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
DESIGNATING AN AGENT TO ACT IN THE CITY'S BEHALF FOR THE PURPOSE
OF OBTAINING CERTAIN FEDERAL ASSISTANCE
BACKGROUND: The Office of Emergency Services for the State of California has asked
me to present the attached resolution for action by the Temecula City Council. This resolution
is in a form acceptable to OES and is required to pursue FEMA funds for the flooding which
occurred in January.
JSG
R:~ende.rpt\OES-Reeo
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA DESIGNATING AN AGENT TO ACT IN THE CITY'S
BEHALF FOR THE PURPOSE OF OBTAINING CERTAIN FEDERAL
ASSISTANCE
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE,
DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1.
That David F. Dixon, City Manager
or
Harwood Edvalson, Assistant City Manager
Or
Mary Jane Mcl-~rney, Finance Officer
is hereby authorized to execute for and in behalf of the City of Temecula, a public entity
established under the laws of the State of California, this application and to file it in the Office
of Emergency Services for the purpose of obtaining certain federal financial assistance under
P.L. 93-288 as mended by the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Assistance Act of 1988,
and/or state financial assistance under the Natural Disaster Assistance Act for flood, which
occurred in January of 1993.
Section 2. That the City of Temecula, a public entity established under the laws of
the State of California, hereby authorizes its agent to provide to the State Office of Emergency
Services for all matters pertaining to such state disaster assistance the assurances and agreements
required.
Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOFrED, this 8th day of June, 1993.
ATTEST:
J. Sat Mu~oz, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
Resos 313
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA)
I, June S. Greek, duly appointed City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby do certify
that the foregoing Resolution No. 93- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City
Council of the City of Temecula on the 8th day of June, 1993 by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
Resos 313
2 ~
C:,'ZltC£11CY SCIY~CC$
Federal P.A. No. -.~. 2- ~.-
DESIGNATION OF
APPLICANT'S AGENT RESOLUTION
tT RESOLVED BY THE
THAT
OF THE
(Name) ' (T~tle)
OR
"('Name) (talc)
OR
(Name)
hereby .',uthorbzd to c~cute Jar and i~x b~hatr of the , n pul~llc entity
c~c::l~lishcd under the law: of the ScaLe of ~lifornia. th~ application an~ to fi!~' k in th~ Otnc~ o~ Emcr~ucy Scrvic~,~
the pur~sc of obta~nin zr~ federal Gnanci~ ~tM~ under P.L. 93-~ as amended by thc R~crt T.
Stall~rd Disaster Relief a~
~er~ncy ~btaaco Act of 1~, and/or st:re
~n~t askLance under the N::tur;d
Oi.;~ter ~istanee Act for , which occu~d in of
(~. ~d, e~rthquakc, ct~) (month and ~ar)
THAT ihc e public endW csiabiishc~ under Htc h~ or ihc 5talc or
Cal;Ibrnla, hereby l~thor~e$ ii5 ag~m Lo pr~idc tj the SLat= 0~ or Emctgcn~ Services for all m~ttcrs p~rt~in~nB
~uch state d~or ~$~lance the assuranus a~d a~ccmcnu rcqu~.
Passed ~d approval this day of . D
(Name and title)
(Namc and t ;tie)
(Name and Title)
resolution passed and approved b~
· day of
CERTIFICATION
, duly appolnt~d and or
(.: ttk~)
, do hereby certify that the above It a true and correct eopy of a
of tl~ tm the
Dut c:
"(Ol'ficiM Peltion)
-.,..-~i3 rem t3O (!tm, %Zlgt) DAD rem
(SiJnatur~)
ITEM
NO.
7
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
City Council/City Manager
Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning ~>2''
DATE: June 8, 1993
SUBJECT: General Plan Contract Amendment for Completion Workprogram
RECOMMENDATION: It is requested that the City Council:
AMEND the General Plan Contract by ,~ 27,750.00 for the
completion of the Workprogram.
DISCUSSION:
Staff is requesting a budget augmentation in the amount of ,~ 27,750.00 to cover the cost
of additional work done as part of the General Plan Workprogram. The following table shows
the provisions of the original contract and the additional work required.
Original Contracts
5 Joint PC/CC Workshops
2 Planning Commission
Meetings
3 runs of Traffic Model
and Traffic Consultant
attendance at 1 PC
meeting
Single Draft General Plan
Additional Work
Additional Joint
PC/CC Meeting
4 Additional Planning
Commission meetings
Supplemental run of
Model and attendance
at 2"d PC Meeting
2"d Draft for City
Council
Comments J Cost
Additional Workshops ~ 1,959.00
required to discuss
Land Use Plan
Additional Meetings
Necessary to complete
Public Hearing process
Additional run for N.
General Kearny
extension alternatives
requested
2"d Draft necessary to
incorporate Planning
Commission
recommendations and
simplify presentation
to City Council
4,733.00
3,250.00
2,256.00
, _ R:%S\GENPLAN%AUGBUDGT.RIC 6/1/93 tie
~ 'Original Contracts. '~ Additional Work ~ ' Comments I Cost
Addendum to Draft EIR to Separate Final EIR Due to significant ~ 7,010.00
serve as Final EIR Document changes, separate
document document necessary
to simplify
presentation
Two City Council 6 additional City Additional meetings $ 6,000.00
Meetings Council meetings necessary to complete
Public Hearing process
Total: :~: ~: :': '~ S :25,208.00
FISCAL IMPACT:
Because the workprogram is not yet co~npleted, staff has added an additional 10 percent to
cover any further requested supplemental work. The planning Department can fund this
request through existing surplus from Account No. 0011619995248 .in the Fiscal Year 1992-
1993 operating budget.
R:\S%GENPLAN~AUGBUDGT,R1C 6/1/93 tj= ~
ITEM
NO.
8
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
APPROVAL:
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER ~
/
City Council/City Manager
Anthony Elmo, Chief Building Official
June 8, 1993
Award of Contra(~t for Weed Abatement Services
RECOMM EN DATION:
Approve an Award of Contract for weed abatement services on an as-needed basis
to:
Primary:
Smith Tractor Services
P.O. Box 527
Wildomar, CA 92595
Secondary:
Rory Rieck
15860 Oro Glen Drive
Moreno Valley, CA 92553
DISCUSSION:
In response to the severe fire hazards that exist throughout the City due to the
excessive vegetation growth, staff prepared a Request for Proposal (RFP) for
contractors to work with the Fire Department and Code Enforcement Division's Weed
Abatement Program. Approximately 41 RFP's were sent out with two (2) responses
being returned. Staff proposes to award contracts to a primary and secondary
contractor to ensure expeditious abatement of these conditions. The following is a
listing of the firms in order of ranking:
1. Smith Tractor Services
Discing
Up to one acre
More than one acre
935.00 per acre
945.00 per acre
Flail Mowing
Up to one acre
More than one acre.
937.00 per acre
947.00 per acre
Agenda Report
June 8, 1993
Page 2
2. Rory Rieck
Discing
Up to one acre
More than one acre
$35.00 per acre
$50.00 per acre
Flail Mowinq
Up to one acre
More than one acre
Non-submitted
Non-submitted
Posting of property began on April 13, 1993, with voluntary abatement requested
within a thirty (30) day period. Property not in compliance with the posted abatement
order is to be abated by the City authorized contractor. All abatement including an
administrative cost of $170.00 per acre, will be recorded against the property in the
form of a lien recorded in the office of the County Recorder.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Funds in the amount of $5,000 have been transferred from Account//999-5248,
Consulting Services, to Account//999-5537, Weed Abatement,, to pay for services
provided during this Fiscal Year. This account will be adjusted for '93 - '94 as the
need occurs to complete the weed abatement program.
Agenda,Rep~CCCMWeed. Abatement
ITEM
NO.
9
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
City Manager/City Council
FROM:
Mary Jane McLarney, Finance Officer
DATE: June 8, 1993
SUBJECT:
Cooperative Agreement with County of Riverside for the
Community Development Block Grant Program
Prepared by:
Grant M. Yates, Financial Services Administrator
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the three year cooperative
agreement with the County of Riverside for the administration of the Community
Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program.
DISCUSSION: The City of Temecula was recently offered direct entitlement
status for the CDBG Program starting in the 1994 Fiscal Year.
This offer of entitlement status would mean that the City of Temecuia is eligible to
receive CDBG funds directly from the Federal Government' s Housing and Urban
Development Agency (HUD). Currently, CDBG funds would be passed to the City
through the County who is responsible for administering the program.
In reviewing this option with officials from Riverside County and HUD, staff
determined that the City is eligible to receive $172,000 in the 1993-94 Fiscal Year
if we remain under the County program. The amount of money the City would receive
if we chose entitlement status would be $154,000 or $18,000 less than is available
if we continue with the County. The reason for this difference is that the funding
formula or criteria would change because of entitlement status. Riverside County
officials explained that the City's relatively new housing stock contains few
substandard units. These units are weighed heavily when calculating funding
allocations for entitlement cities.
The attached agreement will require the City to remain with the County for the next
three years. At the end of that time, the City will again be given the opportunity to
review and possibly select entitlement status.
FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact associated with approving the
three-year cooperation agreement.
Attachment:
Three-Year Cooperative Agreement
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
~ 15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
COOPERATION AGREEMENT
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS IMPLEMENTING
THE HOUSING AND COMMUNITy DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 1974
AS AMENDED BY
THE HOUSING AND URBAN RURAL RECOVERY ACT OF 1983
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE of the State of California,
hereinafter referred to as "COUNTY,,, and City of Temecula, an
incorporated municipality within the geographical boundaries of
the COUNTY, hereinafter referred to as "CITY,,, mutually agree as
follows:
1. GENERAL.
The Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as
amended by the Housing and Urban Rural Recovery Act of 1983, and as
amended by the Cranston-Gonzales National Affordable Housing Act
(Public Law 101-625) hereinafter referred to as the "Act", provides
that grant funds may be used for the development of viable urban
communities by providing decent housing and a suitable living
environment and by expanding economic oPPortunities Principally for
persons of low and moderate income.
COUNTY is qualified as an "Urban County,, under the Act.
CITY, by executing this Agreement, hereby gives notice of its
election to Participate in an Urban County Community Development
Block Grant program, hereinafter referred to as "CDBG programs,,.
Furthermore, COUNTy is hereby authorized to carry out activities
which will be funded by Community Development block Grants from
federal fiscal Years 1994, 1995 and 1996 aPPropriations and from
any program income generated by the expenditure of such funds.
COUNTy and CITY hereby agree to cooperate or to assist
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
in undertaking community renewal and lower income housing
assistance activities, specifically urban renewal and publicly
assisted housing.
2. ..TERM.
The term of this Agreement shall be for not less than a
period of three (3) years commencing on the date specified below
and extending through the federal fiscal years FY 1994, FY 1995
and FY 1996.
3. PREPARATION OF FEDERALLY REOUIRED FUNDING
APPLICATIONS.
COUNTY, by and through its Economic Development Agency,
subject to approval of COUNTY's Board of Supervisors, shall be
responsible for preparing and submitting to the Department of
Housing and Urban Development, hereinafter referred to as "HUD",
15 in a timely manner those reports and statements required by the
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
.24
25
26
27
28
Act and the federal regulations promulgated by HUD to secure
entitlement grant funding under the CDBG program.
4. COMPLIANCE WITH FEDERAL STATUTES. REGULATIONS AND
OTHER APPLICABLE STATUTES, REGULATIONS AND ORDINANCES.
(a) COUNTY and CITY will comply with the applicable
provisions of the Act and those federal regulations promulgated
by HUD pursuant thereto, as the same currently exists or may
hereafter by amended. (104(b) of Title I; Title 42 United States
Code S5301, et seq., and Title 24 Code of Federal Regulations
Part 570.) In addition, COUNTY and CITY will comply with Title VI
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. S~3601, et seq.); the
Fair Housing Act; Cranston-Gonzales National Affordable Housing Act
(Public Law 101-625); Section 109 Title I of the Housing and
2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
L5
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Community Development Act of 1974 (42 U-S-C.-S5309); Executive
Order 11063, as amended by Executive Order 12259; Section 109 of
the Act of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C.
S~4321, et seq.); the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real
Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. ~4630, et
seq.) and any other federal or state statute or regulation that is
applicable to use of entitlement grant funds.
(b) COUNTY and CITY shall:
1. Meet the citizen participation requirements of
570,301(a)(2) and provide citizens with:
A. the estimate of the amount of CDBG funds
proposed to be used for activities that will benefit
persons of low and moderate income; and
B. a plan for minimizing displacement of
persons as a result of activities assisted with CDBG
funds and to assist persons actually displaced as a
result of such activities.
(c) CITY shall follow a detailed citizen
Participation plan which:
1. provides for and-encourages citizen
Participation, with particular emphasis on participation by
persons of low and moderate income who are residents
of slum and blighted areas and of areas in Which funds
are proposed to be used, and provides for participation
of residents in low and moderate income neighborhoods;
2. provides citizens with reasonable and timely
access to local meetings, information and records
3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
relating to the grantee,s proposed use of funds, as
required by the regulations of the Secretary, and relating
to the actual use of funds under the Act;
3. provides for technical assistance to groups
representative of persons of low and moderate income that
request such assistance in developing proposals with the level
and type of assistance to be determined by the
grantee;
4. provides for public hearings to obtain citizen
views and to respond to proposals and questions at all stages of
the community development program, including at.least the
development of needs, the review of proposed activities and
review of program performance, which hearings shall be held after
adequate notice, at times an locations convenient to potential or
actual beneficiaries, and with accommodation for the
handicapped;
complaints
5. provides for a timely written answer to written
and grievances, within 15 working days where
Practicable; and
20
21
22
23
.24
25
26
27
28
6. identifies how the'needs of non-English speaking
residents will be met in the case of public hearings where a
significant number of non-English speaking residents can be
reasonably expected to participate.
(d) CITY shall develop a community development plan,
for the period of this Agreement, that identifies community
development and housing needs and specifies both short and
long-term community development objectives that have been
4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
12
13
14
[5
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
developed in accordance with the primary objective and
requirements of the Act.
(e) CITY is subject to the same requirements
applicable to subrecipients, including the requirement for a
written agreement set forth in 24 CFR 570,503."
CITY certifies, to the best of its knowledge,
(f)
and belief, that:
1.
No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or
will be paid, by or on behalf of the CITY, to any person for
influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of
any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of
Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection
with the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any
Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into
of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation,
renewal, amendment or modification of any Federal contract,
grant, loan or cooperative agreement.
2. If any funds other than Federally appropriated
funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for
influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of
any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of
Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress -in connection
with this Federal contract, grant, loan or cooperative agreement,
the undersigned shall complete and submit . standard Form-LLL,
"Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying,,, in accordance with its
instructions.
3. The CITY shall require that the language of this
5
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
.24
25
26
27
28
certification be included in the award documents for all
subawards at all tiers (including subcontracts, subgrants, and
contracts under grants, loans, and cooperative agreements) and
that all subrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly.
This certification is a material representation of
fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made
or entered into.
(g) CERTIFICATION REGARDING POLICY PROHIBITING USE
OF EXCESSIVE FORCE.
In accordance with Section 519 Public Law 101-144,
(the 1990 HUD Appropriations Act), the CITY certifies that: It
has adopted and is enforcing a policy prohibiting the use of
excessive force by law enforcement agencies within its
jurisdiction against any individuals engaged in non-violent civil
rights demonstrations, and that it has adopted and is enforcing
applicable State and local laws against physically baring entrance
to or exit from a facility or location which is the subject of such
non-violent civil rights demonstrations within jurisdictions.
(h) The City and County agree that Community
Development Block Grant funding for any activities
in or in support of any cooperating City, that does
not affirmatively further fair housing within its
own jurisdiction, or that
action to comply with
certification is prohibited.
COMPLIANCE WITH POLICY AND
impedes the County,s
its fair housing
PROGRAM OBJECTIVES.
Policy and program objectives as required by applicable
6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
~5
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
federal regulations or for the efficient administration of the
CDBG program will be adopted by COUNTY,s Board of SuPervisors.and
COUNTY and CITY will adhere to said policy and program
objectives.
6. SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT.
For each Fiscal year during the term of this Agreement,
COUNTY and CITY shall enter into a Supplemental Agreement that
will have a term coinciding with a Program Year and enumerate the
project(s) CITY will implement with its entitlement funds. Said
Supplemental Agreement willsset forth the time schedule for
completion of said project(s) and any funding sources, in
addition to entitlement funds, that will be used in completing the
project(s). If substantial compliance with the completion
schedule, due to unforeseen or uncontrollable circumstances,
cannot be met by CITY, the schedule for the project(s) may be
extended. If substantial progress toward drawdown of funds
is not made during the term of the Supplemental Agreement, the
entitlement funds associated with the project(s) may be
reprogrammed by COUNTY after appropriate notice is given
CITY.
COUNTY,s decision not to extend the completion schedule
associated with the project(s) or to reprogram the entitlement
funds associated with the project(s) will not excuse CITY from
complying with terms of this Agreement.
7. DETERMINATION OF PROJEC'TS TO BE FUNDED AND
DISTRIBUTION OF ENTITLEMENT FUNDS.
CITY will, prior to the commencement of a Program Year,
7
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1 designate those projects that it desires to implement with. its
2 entitlement funds said designation to comply with statutory and
regulatory provisions governing citizen's participation. Said
designation is to be reviewed by the COUNTY's Economic
Development Agency to determine that the project is eligible
under federal regulations for funding and consistent with both
federal and COUNTY policy governing use of Community Development
Block Grant (CDBG) funds.
COUNTY's Board of Supervisors will, consistent with
Paragraphs 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 of this Agreement determine the
distribution and disposition of all CDBG funds received by COUNTY
pursuant to the Act.
8. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT MANUAL.
CITY warrants that those officers, employees and agents
retained by it and responsible for implementing those projects
funded by CDBG funds have received, reviewed and will follow the
Community Development Block Grant Manual that has been prepared
by COUNTY and, by this reference, said Manual is incorporated
herein and made a part hereof.
9. REAL PROPERTY ACOUIRED OR PUBLIC FACILITY
CONSTRUCTED WITH CDBG FUNDS.
When CDBG funds are used, in whole or in part by CITY
to acquire real property or to construct a public facility, CITY
will comply with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(42 U.S.C. SS4321, et seq.), the California Environmental Quality
Act (Cal. Pub. Resources Code S~21000, et seq.), the Uniform
Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act
8
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
of 1970 (42 U.S.C. S~4630, et seq.), California Government Code
Sections 7260 et seq., as those Acts may be amended from time to
time and any federal or state regulations issued to implement the
aforementioned laws, and the Comprehensive Housing Affordability
Strategy, and the Housing Plan for the Community Development Block
Grant Program adopted by COUNTY.
In addition, the following is to occur:
(1) Title to the real property shall vest in CITY;
(2) the real property will be held by or the constructed
facility will be maintained by the CITY for a minimum period of
five (5) years;
(3) while held by CITY, the real property or the
constructed facility is to be used exclusively for the purpose for
which acquisition or construction was originally' approved by
COUNTy;
(4) CITY shall provide timely notice to COUNTy of any
action which would result in a modification or change in the use of
the real property purchased or improved, in whole or in part, with
CDBG funds from that planned at the time of acquisition or
improvement, including disposition..
(5) Written approval from COUNTY must be secured if
the property or the facility is to be put to an alternate use
that is or is not consistent with federal regulations governing
CDBG funds;
(6) Should CITY desire during the five (5) year period to
use the real property or the constructed facility for a purpose not
consistent with applicable federal regulations governing CDBG
9
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
funds or to sell the real property or facility, then:
(a) If CITY desires to retain title, it will have to
reimburse either COUNTY or the federal government an amount that
represents the percentage of current fair market value that is
identical to the percentage of current fair market value that is
identical to the percentage that CDBG funds comprised monies paid
to initially acquire the property or construct the facility; or
(b) if CITY sells the property or facility or
is required to sell the property or facility, CITY is to
reimburse either the COUNTy or the federal government an amount
that represents the percentage or proceeds realized by the sale
that is identical to the percentage that CDBG funds comprised
monies paid to initially acquire the property or construct the
facility. This percentage amount will be calculated after
deducting all actual and reasonable cost of sale from the sale
proceeds.
10. DISPOSITION OF INCOME GENERATED BY THE EXPENDITURE
OF CDBG FUNDS.
CITY shall inform COUNTY of any income generated by the
expenditure of CDBG funds received by CITY from COUNTY's. CITY
may retain any program income so generated. Any and all program
income may only be used for eligible activities in accordance
with all CDBG requirements, including all requirement,s for
citizen Participation.
COUNTY has the responsibility for monitoring and
reporting to HUD on the use of any such program income, thereby
requiring appropriate record keeping and reporting by CITY as may
10
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
.5
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
,24
25
26
27
be needed and requested by COUNTY.
In the event of a change in status of CITY or the
close-out of funds governed by of this Cooperation Agreement, any
and all program income that is currently on hand or received
subsequent to the change in status of close-out shall be paid to
COUNTY.
11. TERMINATION.
This Agreement may not be terminated by either CITY or
COUNTY, nor may the CITY or COUNTY withdraw from this Agreement
or any of the terms of this Agreement.
12. FORMER AGREEMENTS UTILIZING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
BLOCK GRANT FUNDS BETWEEN COUNTY AND CITY.
All agreements between CITY and COUNTY,S regarding the
use of CDBG funds for fiscal years 1975-76 through 1992-93 and
any supplemental agreements thereunder, shall remain in full
force and effect. If the language of this Agreement is in
conflict or inconsistent with the terms of any prior said
agreements between CITY and COUNTY, the language of this
Agreement will be controlling.
13. LIABILITY.
COUNTY shall assume no liability for the negligence of
CITY or of any officer, employee or agent thereof, and CITY shall
hold COUNTY free and harmless from any loss, damage or liability
that may arise out of the performance of this Agreement.
CITY shall indemnify COUNTY,S in the amount of any CITY
expenditure under this Agreement which is determined by HUD to be
improper, if such amount is charged against the COUNTY or
11
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
withheld from COUNTY'S share of funds under the Act.
CITY shall assume no liability for the negligence of
COUNTY or of any officer, employee or agent thereof, and COUNTY,S
shall hold CITY free and harmless for any loss, damage or
liability that may arise out of the performance of this
Agreement.
COUNTY shall indemnify CITY in the amount of any COUNTY'S
expenditure under this Agreement which is determined by HUD to be
improper, if such amount is charged against the CITY or withheld
from CITY'S share of funds under the Act.
Dated:
, 1993
ATTEST:
GERALD A. MALONEY
Clerk of the Board
By:
Deputy
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
By:
Chairman, Board of Supervisors
ATTEST:
CITY OF BANNING
By:
By:
,City Clerk Chief Executive Officer, Mayor
COUNTY COUNSEL CERTIFICATION
The Office of the County Counsel hereby certifies that
the terms and provisions of this Agreement are fully authorized
under state and local law and that the Agreement provides full
legal authority for the COUNTY to undertake or assist in
undertaking essential community development and housing
assistance activities specifically urban renewal and publicly
assisted housing.
WILLIAM C. KATZENSTEIN
County Counsel
By:
Deputy
12
ITEM NO. 10
ORDINANCE NO. 93-12
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING FORTIONS OF ORDINANCE NO. 348
AND 92-16 PERTAINING TO THE REGULATION OF TEMPORARy
SIGNS.
THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN
AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Findings. The City Council for the City of Temecula hereby finds the
following:
A. That the City Council is authorized by Section 65850(b) of State Planning and
Zoning Law, to adopt ordinances regulating signs and billboards;
B. That there is a need to improve the competitiveness of service and commercial
businesses and maintain the aesthetic quality of all areas in the City;
C. That there is a need to provide specific and historically appropriate temporary
signage in the Old Town area;
D. That regulating temporary signage is an effective method to improve the aesthetic
quality of all areas in the City;
E. That the overuse of temporary signs results in visual clutter, the deterioration of
the City's commercial and service districts, and the inefficient use of business advertising
resources;
F. That the City is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of the general
plan and there is a reasonable probability that this Ordinance will be consistent with the general
plan proposal now being considered and studied;
G. That pursuant to City Ordinance 90-04, the City Council adopted by reference
Riverside County Ordinance No. 348, which the Council has subsequently mended through
various City Ordinances;
H. The City Council adopted City Ordinance No. 92-16, amending Ordinance No.
348, on October 27, 1992; and,
I. That there is a need to mend Ordinance No. 92-16 to improve the ability of the
City to regulate and control temporary signs.
R:XORD~\9'~-12
Section 2. Paragraph aa of Section 19.2 of Article XIX of Ordinance No. 348 is
hereby amended to read as follows:
'aa. "Portable Sign" means a sign not designed to be attached to a
building or structure, vehicle or trailer. Examples of portable signs include, but are not limited
to: A-Frames, also known as sandwich boards, and T-Frames, also known as spring-loaded
signs. '
Section 3.
read as follows:
Section 19.2 of Article XIX of Ordinance No. 348 is hereby amended to
"dd. "Attached temporary sign' means a temporary sign which is
mounted, placed, or attached only to the permanent building where the business activity is
conducted.
ee. "Detached temporary sign' means a temporary sign which is
partially attached to a permanent building, attached to a temporary structure such as a pole or
pipe, or any combination of the above. Detached temporary signs do not include portable or
vehicle mounted signs.
if- "A-Frame" means a portable advertising device which is commonly
in the shape of an 'A', or some variation thereof, is located on the ground, is easily move.hie,
and is usually two-sided.'
Section 4. Subsection C of Section 19.9 of Article XIX of Ordinance No. 348 is
hereby amended to read as follows:
"C. Promotional Signs. Promotional signs are permitted in the C-I, C-P, C-P-S, C-
T, and M-SC zones and shall comply with the appropriate requirements listed below:
any combination.
In any year attached and detached temporary signage may not be used in
2. All promotional signs shall be located on the site where the use or activity
is located. The standards for the various types of promotional signs are as follows:
requirements:
Attached promotional signs shall comply with the following
(1) The maximum height of the top of any attached promotional
sign shall not exceed the top of the cave line or parapet wall of the building where the use or
activity is located.
R:'~ORII~V3-12
(2)
The dimensions shall not exceed any the following:
22
feet. (a) The surface area shall not exceed fifty (50) square
(3) feet.
(h)
The height (vertical dimension) shall not exceed three
(c) The width (horizontal dimension) shall not exceed
sixty percent (6055) of the business or store frontage, whichever is smaller.
requirements:
Detached promotional signs shall comply with the following
(1) The maximum height of the top of any detached promotional
sign shall not exceed six (6) feet above the ground.
(2) The surface area shall not exceed thirty two (32) square feet.
(3) Detached promotional signs shall be mounted to a frame.
The frame shall be constructed of attractive permanent materials and shall be constructed so that
not additional supports or bracing is required.
(4) No detached promotional sign may be permitted, placed,
erected or installed if the detached promotional sign blocks, restricts, or impairs any of the
following:
or activity;
(a)
(b)
The public's view of another business or activity;
The public's view of the signage for another business
vehicle; or,
(c)
The view or visibility of the operator of any motor
(d) The movement of any pedestrian or motor vehicle.
c. Promotional signs that are located on window surfaces shall not
exceed twenty five percent (25 %) of the non-door window area, except that no permit shall be
required for promotional window signs that cover ten percent (10%) or less of the non-door
window surface area.
3. The maximum duration for detached promotional signs is two thirty (30)
day periods per calendar year, provided that there shall be a minimum sixty (60) day interval
between any two thirty (30) day periods. The maximum duration for attached promotional signs
is four thirty (30) day periods per calendar year, provided that there shall be a minimum sixty
(60) day interval between any two thirty (30) day periods."
R:~ORD~'8~-12
Section $. Subsection D of Section 19.9 of Article XIX of Ordinance No. 348 is
hereby amended to read as follows:
'D. Grand Opening and Interim Signs. Grand opening and interim signs are
permitted in the C-I, C-P, C-P-S, C-T, and M-SC zones and shall comply with the appropriate
requirements listed below:
1. For each use or business activity; up to one (1) sign may be allowed.
Except for a use or business activity with frontage on two or more arterial streets, then up to two
(2) signs may be allowed.
2. Grand opening signs may be permitted once in the first ninety (90) days of
business operation.
3. Interim signs are for interim and emergency purposes and shall contain only
the business name and logo. No interim sign may be permitted unless an application for a permit
to construct a permanent sign has been filed with the Department of Building and Safety.
4. All Grand opening and interim signs shall be attached to the building where
the use or activity is located and shall comply with the following requirements:
a. The maximum height of the top of any sign shall not exceed the top
of the cave line or parapet wall of the building where the use or activity is located.
requirements: b. The dimensions of any sign shall not exceed any the following
feet.
(1)
(2)
The surface area shall not exceed thirty (30) square feet.
The height (vertical dimension) shall not exceed three (3)
(3) The width (horizontal dimension) shall not exceed fifty
percent (50%) of the business or store frontage, whidhever is smaller.
c. Grand opening and interim signs may be allowed for any period up
to forty-five (45) days. The Director of Planning may allow one time extension, for any period
up to thirty (30) days, with good cause. It is the responsibility for the proponent of the extension
to justify why the extension is appropriate."
Section 6. A new Subsection E of Section 19.9 of Article XIX of Ordinance No. 348.
The existing Subsection E is hereby renumbered to F. The new Section E hereby reads as
follows:
"E. Special Event Signs. Special event signs may be located anywhere in the City
(including in Historic Old Town Temecula), should be located on the site of the special event or
R:~ORDS~.93-12
,4
activity being advertised, and shall comply with the requirements listed below:
I. All special event interim signs which are located in a building or structure
shall be attached to the building or structure where the use or activity is located and shall comply
with the following requirements:
a. The maximum height of the top of any sign shall not exceed the top
of the cave line or parapet wall of the building where the use or activity is located.
requirements:
The dimensions of any sign shall not exceed any the following
feet.
(1)
(2)
The surface area shall not exceed thirty two (32) square feet.
The height (vertical dimension) shall not exceed three (3)
(3) The width (horizontal dimension) shall not exceed fifty
percent (50%) of the business or store frontage, whichever is smaller.
c. Special event signs may be allowed for any period up to forty-five
(45) days. The Director of Planning may allow one time extension, for any period up to an
additional forty-five (45) days, with good cause. It is the responsibility for the proponent of the
extension to justify why the extension is appropriate.
2. All special event interim signs which are not located in buildings or
structures shall be securely attached to poles or a structure on the site where the use or activity is
located and shall comply with the following requirements:
feet in height.
The maximum height to the top of any sign shall not exceed six (6)
requirements:
bm
The dimensions of any sign shall not exceed any the following
feet.
(l)
(2)
The surface area shall not exceed thirty two (32) square feet.
The height (vertical dimension) shall not exceed three (3)
feet.
(3)
The width (horizontal dimension) shall not exceed fifteen (15)
c. Special event signs may be allowed for any period up to forty-five
(45) days. The Director of Planning may allow one time extension, for any period up to an
additional thirty (30) days, with good cause. It is the responsibility for the proponent of the
extension to justify why the extension is appropriate.
R:~ORD~9"J-12
3. Special event signs for special community-wide events, such as the Tractor
Races and Wine and Balloons Festival, may be allowed additional supplemental and/or directional
temporary signage at the discretion of the Director of Planning. All supplemental temporary
signs should follow the criteria and standards contained in Sections 1 and 2 above. Supplemental
directional signage should not exceed thirty two (32) square feet on arterial roadways and twenty
four (24) square feet on minor roadways. The appropriate sizes and locations for all
supplemental and/or directional temporary signs shall be determined by the Director of
Planning."
Section 7. Subsection D of Section 19.10 of Article XIX of Ordinance No. 348 is
hereby mended to read as follows:
"D. Promotional Signs in Historic Old Town Temecula. Promotional signs in Historic
Old Town Temecula are permiRed in the C-l, C-P, C-P-S, and M-SC zones and shall comply
with the requirements listed below:
1. In any one year, attached and window signage may be used in any
combination provided that the total sign face area for all promotional signs, including attached
and window promotional signs, does not exceed twelve (12) square feet.
2. Promotional signs in Historic Old Town Temecula shall be attached to the
building where the use or business activity is located and shall comply with the following
requirements:
a. The maximum height of the top of any temporary sign shall not
exceed the top of the cave line or parapet wall of the building where the use or activity is
located. No promotional sign shall be erected or placed so as to interfere with normal pedestrian
and vehicular traffic.
b. The surface area shall not exceed twelve (12) square feet.
c. Promotional signs shall be made of non-glossy material with a fabric
or cloth-like appearance and shall use dull, non-primary, non-fluorescent, and non-iridescent
colors.
3. The maximum duration for attached promotional signs is four thirty (30)
day periods per calendar year, provided that there shall be a minimum sixty (60) day interval
between any two thirty (30) day periods."
Section 8. Subsection E of Section 19.10 of Article XIX of Ordinance No. 348 is
hereby amended to read as follows:
"E. Grand Opening and Interim Signs. Grand opening and interim signs are
permitted in the C-l, C-P, C-P-S, C-T, and M-SC zones and shall comply with the appropriate
requirements listed below:
R:~3RD~93-12
1. For each use or business activity; up to one (1) sign may be allowed.
Except for a use or business activity with frontage an two or more arterial streets, then up to two
(2) signs may be allowed.
2. Grand opening signs may be permitted once in the f'trst ninety (90) days of
business operation.
3. Interim signs are for interim and emergency purposes and shall contain only
the business name and logo. No interim sign may be permitted unless an application for a permit
to construct a permanent sign has been filed with the Department of Building and Safety.
4. All Grand opening and interim signs shall be attached to the building where
the use or activity is located and shall comply with the following requirements:
d. The maximum height of the top of any sign shall not exceed the top
of the cave line or parapet wall of the building where the use or activity is located.
requirements:
The dimensions of any sign shall not exceed any the following
(1) The surface area shall not exceed thirty (30) square feet.
feet.
(2)
The height (vertical dimension) shall not exceed three (3)
(3) The width (horizontal dimension) shall not exceed fifty
percent (50%) of the business or store frontage, whichever is smaller.
f. Grand opening and interim signs may be allowed for any period up
to forty-five (45) days. The Director of Planning may allow one time extension, for any period
up to thirty (30) days, with good cause. It is the responsibility. for the proponent of the extension
to justify why the extension is appropriate."
Section 9. CEOA Compliance The City Council finds that the regulation of
temporary signs in existing commercial, industrial, and retail zones has no possibility of having a
significant impact on the environment. As a result, the adoption of these regulations is exempt
from environmental review pursuant to the provisions of Section 15061(b)(3)of the State CEQA
Guidelines prepared pursuant to Section 21083 of the California Environmental Quality Act, as
amended.
. _ R:~ORD~\93-12 77 $~/93
Section 10. Effective Date This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty
(30) days after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and
cause copies of this Ordinance to be posted in three designated posting places.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this day, the __ day of__
,1993.
ATTEST:
J. SAL MU~IOZ
MAYOR
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, HEREBY DO CERTIFY that the
foregoing Ordinance No.93- was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular
meeting of the City Council "of the City of Temecula on the 25th day of May, 1993, and that
thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council
of the City of Temecula on the day of ,1993, by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
ITEM NO.
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER ~
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
City Council/City Manager
City Attorney Scott F. Field
DATE:
June 8, 1993
SUBJECT:
Development Processing Fees - Public Hearing
(Continued from meeting of May 11, 1993)
RECOMMENDATION:
Re-open continued Public Hearing and take testimony on the issues.
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ADOPTING A DEVELOPMENT PROCESSING FEE STRUCTURE FOR PLANNING,
ENGINEERING AND BUILDING SAFETY SERVICES AND REPEALING
RESOLUTION NO. 90-81
BACKGROUND: Under State law, cities may establish development processing fees that
do not exceed the cost of providing the services for processing development applications.
Historically, the City followed the County Fee Schedule with few exceptions by adoption of
Resolution No. 90-81 on July 24, 1990.
The study conducted by Cordoba Corporation last year showed that the existing fee'
schedule for user fees and charges is valid with certain modifications. The study concluded
that the City is recovering 92% of the total cost of providing current planning, engineering and
building and safety services· However, since the only historical data available for the study
was from the period when the firm of Willdan Engineering provided these services, the study
will need to be repeated in approximately eighteen (18) months when the City has completed
the transition to regular full-time staffing.
In the interim, based on the Cordoba study, City staff is proposing certain revisions to
the existing fee schedule to correct obvious inequities. Those modifications are set forth in
the proposed Fee Schedule attached to the Resolution as Exhibit "A" and are listed on
Attachment 3 (attached hereto) as "List of Fee Changes."
Agenda Report
Development Processing Fees
June 8, 1993
Page 2.
ATTACHMENTS: 1.
JSG
Resolution adopting a development processing fee structure for
Planning, Engineering and Building and Safety Services and
repealing Resolution No. 90-81
List of Fee Changes.
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING A DEVELOPMENT
PROCESSING FEE STRUCTURE FOR PLANNING,
ENGINEERING AND BUILDING SAFETY SERVICES
AND REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 90-81
WHEREAS, City Ordinance No. 90-14 provides that the City Council may adopt by
resolution a schedule of fees for land use matters and related functions and may subsequen~y
amend such schedule by resolution; and
WHEREAS, on July 24, 1990, by Resolution No. 90.81, the City Council adopted a
consolidated schedule of fees for land use matters and related functions; and
WHEREAS, certain revisions to the existing fee schedule have been recommended
based on the results of the "User Charges and Fees Study" dated March 11, 1992 conducted for
the City of Temecula by Cordoba Corporation; and
WHEREAS, a noticed public hearing has been held by the City Council at which time
all interested persons had the opportunity to appear and be heard on the matter of adopting the
revised schedule of fees which is identified below;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The City of Temecula hereby adopts Exhibit "A" attached hereto as its Fee
Schedule for Planning, Engineering and Building and Safety Services.
Section 2. Resolution No. 90-81 is hereby repealed.
Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and shall cause
the same to be posted as required by law.
Resos 309
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this May, 1993.
ATTEST:
J. Sa Mufioz, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula DO HEREBY CERTIFY that
Resolution No. 93- was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular
meeting thereof held on the day of May, 1993, by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Resos 309 ~
FEE S CHED ULE
Adopted
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
(909) 694-6400
CITY OF TEMECULA 'S
ALPHA INDEX FOR THE FEE SCHEDULE
Administrative Plot Plan
Air Quality Element Fee
Page
........................................ 22
........................................ 41
All other Applications (Initial Study Negative Declaration) ................... 52
Alternative and experimental Sewage Disposal Systems including
on-site evaluation plan review
..................................... 49
Amendment of Permit (change in number of hogs at permittee's option) .......... 31
Amendment of Permit (increase in maximum allowable number of hogs) .......... 31
Annexation Fees
............................................. 58
Appeal (Extension of Time) ...................................... 37
Appeal of Planning Commission Decision
............................. 46
Appeal to City Council
Appeal to Planning Commission
................................... 53
Appeals .................................................. 48
Appeals (subdivision) .......................................... 37
Appeals to Planning Commission, City Council .......................... 22
Application for a permit to remove one or more native living trees .............. 47
Application for an Appeal or Variance
............................... 32
Application involving land which lies within the boundaries of the maps ........... 32
Applications for Commercial Wind Energy Conservation System Permits
(Commercial Wind Energy Conversion System Permits) ..................... 52
Applications for Grading Permits
................................... 52
Applications for Tree Removal
.................................... 52
R.'XSIPI..4NNINGXI. ANDFEES. NEW 2 Reined June 1, 1993 v, gw
Page
Applications involving land which lies within the boundaries of the maps .......... 32
Archival Research Fee for Planning Information
......................... 57
Certificate of Historic Appropriateness ............................... 48
Certificate of Land Division Compliance (fee per parcel) .................... 37
Certificate of Land Division Compliance with waiver of Final Parcel Map
(fee per parcel) .............................................. 37
Certificate of Zoning Compliance and Plot Plans which require field inspection
by Land Use Divisions
......................................... 25
Change of Zone
............................................. 22
Checking Services
.......................................... 18-19
Conditional Use Permit
......................................... 22
Conditional Use Permit (Minor) ................................... 22
Conditional Use Permit (Mobile Home Park) ........................... 23
Conditional Use Permit (Recreational Vehicle Park) ....................... 23
Construction Observation
....................................... 20
Day Care Home (Large Family) ................................... 28
Development Agreement ........................................ 58
Disestablished or Diminishment of an Agricultural Preserve (City Council initiated) .... 55
Disestablished or Enlargement of an Agricultural Pieserve (application initiated) ...... 55
Environmental Impact Report (EIR) ................................. 54
Establishment or enlargement of an Agricultural Preserve (City Council initiated) ..... 55
Establishment or enlargement of an Agriculture Preserve (Applicant Initiated) ....... 55
Execution of a Land Conservation contract for land within and Established Agricultural
Preserve (City Council Initiated) 55
Extension of Time (Subdivision) ................................... 38
Extension of Time - (Conditional Use Permit) ........................... 23
R:L$1PLANN1NGILANDFF. E.$.NEW 3 Revised June 1, 1993 vgw
Page
Extension of Time - (Parcel Maps) .................................. 38
Extension of Time - (Plot Plans) ................................... 23
Extension of Time o (Public Use Permits) ............................. 23
Extension of Time - (Variances)
Extension of Time (Parcel Map)
................................... 24
................................... 38
Fault Hazard Report Review (CEQA) ................................ 53
Filing a Corner Record
......................................... 51
Filing a Record of Survey ....................................... 51
Filing Fees for Expired Recordable Subdivision Maps .................... 40-41
Filing of a Geologic Report for Approval ............................. 45
Final Statutory Condominium Map .................................. 41
Final Subdivision Map Filing ..................................... 41
Fire Safety Inspections (licensed care) ................................ 42
For each Parcel not in the same Land Division, larger that 10,000 sq. ft. in size,
not in an identifies crucial area and where no site evaluation is required
(subsurface disposal system) ...................................... 49
For Multiple Parcels within the same Land Division (subsurface disposal systems) .... 49
General Plan Amendment (Circulation) ............................... 24
General Plan Amendment Filed with a Specific Plafi ....................... 24
General Plan Amendment Filed without a Specific Plan ..................... 24
Geologic Waiver
............................................. 53
Hazardous Waste Facility Siting Permit
............................... 28
Holding Tank Approval ........................................ 50
If pursuant to Section 706 of the rules for the City of Temecula implementing the
California Environmental Quality Act, a previously prepared EIR is utilized as the
draft EIR
................................................. 53
R.'XSIPL.4NNING~L.4NDFF2S.~ 4 Revised June 1, 1993 vgw
Page
If the Project Sponsor prepared the draft EIR ........................... 53
Inspection Fee
.............................................. 31
Kennels (Consistency Determination) Ordinance No. 348 ................... 30
Kennels and Catteries which are processed under Section 18.45 ................ 28
Land Division Unit map Filing (Phasing) .............................. 38
Landscaping Plans
............................................ 59
Late Fee
.................................................. 31
Liquefaction Report ........................................... 53
Lot Line Adjustment ........................................... 38
Lot Revision After Checking ..................................... 39
Major Outdoor Event
.......................................... 29
Merger of Contiguous Parcels
..................................... 39
Minor Change (Parcel Map) ...................................... 38
Minor Change (Subdivision) ........................ ~ ............. 38
Minor Temporary Outdoor Event which is exempt from the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA) .......................................... 29
Minor Temporary Outdoor Event which is not exempt from the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) ................................. 29
New Permit Application Fee
..................................... 31
Notice of Non-Renewal
........................................ 55
Parcel Maps ............................................... 40
Permits
................................................ 20-21
Plan Checks and Inspections - Fire
.................................. 42
Plot Plans for projects which are exempt from the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA) and are not reviewed by any Governmental Agencies other
that the Planning Department ..................................... 25
R:~SIPLANNIblG~tN'DFEES. blEW 5 Revised June l, 1993 vgw
Page
Plot Plans for projects which are exempt from the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA), are under 10,000 square feet but are required to be
transmitted by the Planning Department to other Governmental Agencies for
review
................................................... 25
Plot Plans which are not exempt from the California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA) (projects under 10,000 square feet) ......................... 25
Plot Plans which are not exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
(projects over 10,000 square feet) .................................. 25
Preliminary Elective Evaluation of Sewage Disposal requirements prior to
application to Planning Department (includes evaluation of method of
water supply) ............................................... 50
Projects Continued at Public Hearing ................................ 59
Public Hearing Fees
........................................... 58
Public Use Permit
............................................ 26
Public Use Permit (Minor) ....................................... 26
Reclamation Plans submitted for vested operation conducted after 1/1/76 .......... 46
Refund of Fees
.............................................. 30
Refund of Fees of Ordinance No. 460
................................ 41
Regularly Scheduled Event which has not been held before and is exempt from the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) .......................... 29
Regularly Scheduled Event which has not been held before and is not exempt from the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) . .. ........................ 29
Regularly Scheduled Event which is preexisting and exempt from the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) ................................. 29
Request for Extension of Time to Complete off-site improvements .............. 39
Research Fee for Historic Verification
Research Fee for Planning Information
............................... 57
............................... 57
Reversion to Acreage .......................................... 39
Revised Parcel Map Filing (commercial and industrial parcel maps after two years
of original approval ........................................... 35
R: ISIPI"4N~NGILANDr'~r"F~' NEW 6 Revised June l, 1995 vgw
Page
Revised Parcel Map Filing (residential, commercial and industrial parcel maps;
within two years of original approval) ................................ 35
Revised Permit
.............................................. 46
Revised Permits which do not require a Public Hearing ..................... 24
Revised Permits which require a Public Hearing ......................... 24
Revised Residential Parcel Map (after two years of original approval) ............ 35
Revised Statutory Condominium Subdivision Map Filing (after two years of
original approval) ............................................. 33
Revised Statutory Condominium Subdivision Map Filing (within two years of
original approval) ............................................ 33
Revised Tentative Subdivision Map (aftei' two years of original approval) .......... 36
Revised Tentative Subdivision Map (within two years of original approval) ......... 36
Second Unit
............................................... 26
Setback Adjustment ........................................... 26
Sewer Verification where readily retrievable data is not available (i.e. subdivision or
parcel map files) includes FHA/VA approval forms for systems less that 1 year ...... 50
Site Evaluation and Sewage Disposal Plan Review for individual lots less than
10,000 sq. ft. in size and located outside critical sub-surface Sewage Disposal areas . . . 49
Site Evaluation in conjunction with Sewage Disposal Plan Review in critical
sub-surface Sewage Disposal areas as determined by the health officer ............ 49
Site Evaluation upon request by applicant or his agdnt, to establish preliminary
conditions of approval or verify site conditions
Special Districts Administration
................................... 21
Special Inspection Permit
....................................... 47
Special Service Letter
.......................................... 39
Specific Plan of Land Use
....................................... 26
Specific Plan - Road Specific Plan
................................. 26
R.'XSIPLANNINGLLANDFEE&NEW 7 Revised June l, 199.3 vgw
Page
Statutory Condominium Subdivision and Single-Family Residential Tracts and
Parcel Maps ............................................... 39
Street Name Approval after prior approval (all schedules) ................... 39
Street Names
Substantial Conformance
........................................ 46
Substantial Conformance for Commercial and Accessory Wind Energy Conversion System
Permits
.................................................. 29
Substantial Conformante for permits under Section 18.43 of Ordinance No. 348 ...... 26
Substantial Conformance for Specific Plans
............................ 27
Subsurface Sewage Disposal Plan re-review where a second review is needed
due to modifications, additions, or deletibns to a previously approved design ........ 49
Surface Mining Permit ............................ · ............. 46
Temporary Sign Permit
......................................... 27
Temporary Use Permit not to exceed six months
......................... 27
Tentative Commercial or Industrial Parcel Map sewers) .................... 34
Tentative Residential Parcel Map with Waiver of Final Map .................. 34
Tentative Residential Parcel Map without Waiver of Final Map ................ 34
Tentative Statutory Condominium Subdivision Map Filing (sewers) .............. 33
Tentative Statutory Condominium Subdivision Map .Filing (sub-surface disposal ...... 33
Tentative Subdivision Map in the R-2 or R-4 zone ........................ 36
Tentative Subdivision Map not in the R-2 or R-4 zone (sewers) ................ 35
Tentative Subdivision Map not in the R-2 or R-4 zone (sub-surface disposal) ........ 36
Vacation of Public Streets, Highways Code Section 8300, ET. SEQ .............. 56
Variance filed simultaneously with an application for a Land Division,
Conditional Use Permit, or Plot Plan
................................ 27
Variance Filed Alone
.......................................... 27
R:ISIPI'ANI~hrGILd'NDFE'F'S'NEW 8 Revised June 1, 199.~ vgw
Page
Vesting Statutory Condominium Subdivision Map Filing .................... 37
Vesting Tentative Parcel Map ..................................... 37
Vesting Tentative Single-Family Residential Tract
........................ 37
Waiver of Geologic Report ...................................... 45
Wind Energy Conversion System (Accessory) exempt from the California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA) ............................................... 28
Wind Energy Conversion System (Accessory) not exempt from the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA) .......................................... 28
Wind Energy Conversion System (Commercial) Permit ..................... 28
Wind Energy Conversion System Noise Study ........................... 28
Zoning Information Letter
....................................... 28
R:ISIPLAArNINGtI. AIV'DFEE, S. NEW 9 Revised June l, 1993 vgw
CITY OF TEMECULA 'S
ALPHA INDEX BY ORDINANCE
Page
Checking Services ................................... , ....... 18-19
Construction Observation
....................................... 20
Permits
................................................ 20-21
Special Districts Administration
................................... 21
ORDINANCE NO. 348
Administrative Plot Plan
........................................ 22
Appeals to Planning Commission, City Council
.......................... 22
Certificate of Zoning Compliance and Plot Plans which require field inspection
by Land Use Divisions
......................................... 25
Change of Zone
............................................. 22
Conditional Use Permit
......................................... 22
Conditional Use Permit (Minor) ................................... 22
Conditional Use Permit (Mobile Home Park) ........................... 23
Conditional Use Permit (Recreational Vehicle Park) ....................... 23
Day Care Home (Large Family) ................................... 28
Extension of Time - (Conditional Use Permit) ........................... 23
Extension of Time - (Plot Plans) ................................... 23
Extension of Time - (Public Use Permits) ............................. 23
Extension of Time - (Variances) ................................... 24
General Plan Amendment Filed with a Specific Plan
....................... 24
General Plan Amendment Filed without a Specific Plan ..................... 24
General Plan Amendment - (Circulation) .............................. 24
R.'LS~PLANNINGLLANDFEES. NEW 10 Revised June 1, 1993 vgw
Hazardous Waste Facility Siting Permit
Page
............................... 28
Kennels and Catteries which are processed under Section 18.45 ................ 28
Kennels (Consistency Determination) Ordinance No. 348 ................... 30
Major Outdoor Event
.......................................... 29
Minor Temporary Outdoor Event which is exempt from the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA) .......................................... 29
Minor Temporary Outdoor Event which is not exempt from the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) ................................. 29
Plot Plans for projects which are exempt from the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA) and are not reviewed by any Governmental Agencies other
that the Planning Department ..................................... 25
Plot Plans for projects which are exempt from the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA), are under 10,000 square feet but are required to be
transmitted by the Planning Department to other Governmental Agencies for
review
................................................... 25
Plot Plans which are not exempt from the California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA) (projects under 10,000 square feet) ......................... 25
Plot Plans which are not exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
(projects over 10,000 square feet) .................................. 25
Public Use Permit
............................................ 26
Public Use Permit (Minor) ..................... 26
Refund of Fees
...................... - ........................ 30
Regularly Scheduled Event which is preexisting and exempt from the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) ................................. 29
Regularly Scheduled Event which has not been held before and is exempt from the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) .......................... 29
Regularly Scheduled Event which has not been held before and is not exempt from the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) .......................... 29
Revised Permits which do not require a Public Hearing ..................... 24
Revised Permits which require a Public Hearing ......................... 24
R.'~SIPLANNINGILANDFEES. JVEW II Revised June 1, 1993 vgw
Page
Second Unit
............................................... 26
Setback Adjustment ........................................... 26
Specific Plan of l_and Use
....................................... 26
Specific Plan - Road Specific Plan
................................. 26
Substantial Conformance for permits under Section 18.43 of Ordinance No. 348 ...... 26
Substantial Conformante for Specific Plans
............................ 27
Substantial Conformance for Commercial and Accessory Wind Energy Conversion System
Permits
.................................................. 29
Temporary Use Permit not to exceed six months
......................... 27
Temporary Sign Permit
......................................... 27
Variance filed simultaneously with an application for a Land Division, Conditional
Use Permit, or Plot Plan
........................................ 27
Variance Filed Alone
.......................................... 27
Wind Energy Conversion System (Accessory) exempt from the California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA) ............................................... 28
Wind Energy Conversion System (Accessory) not exempt from the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA) .......................................... 28
Wind Energy Conversion System (Commercial) Permit ..................... 28
Wind Energy Conversion System Noise Study ........................... 28
Zoning Information Letter
....................................... 28
ORDINANCE NO. 431
Amendment of Permit (change in number of hogs at permittee's option) .......... 31
Amendment of Permit (increase in maximum allowable number of hogs) .......... 31
Inspection Fee
.............................................. 3i
Late Fee
.................................................. 31
New Permit Application Fee
........ , ............................ 31
R:LSXPLANNINGll.4NDFEES. NEW 12 Revised June 1, 1993 vgw
Page
ORDINANCE NO. 458
Application involving land which lies within the boundaries of the maps ........... 32
Applications involving land which lies within the boundaries of the maps .......... 32
Application for an Appeal or Variance
............................... 32
ORDINANCE NO. 460
Multi-Family Residential Tracts
Revised Statutory Condominium Subdivision Map Filing (within two years
of original approval) .......................................... 33
Revised Statutory Condominium Subdivision Map Filing (after two years
of original approval) .......................................... 33
Tentative Statutory Condominium Subdivision Map Filing (sewers) .............. 33
Tentative Statutory Condominium Subdivision Map Filing (sub-surface disposal ...... 33
Parcel Maps
Revised Parcel Map Filing (residential, commercial and industrial parcel maps;
within two years of original approval) ................................ 35
Revised Parcel Map Filing (commercial and industrial parcel maps after two years
of original approval ........................................... 35
Revised Residential Parcel Map (after two years of original approval) ............ 35
Tentative Commercial or Industrial Parcel Map (sewers) .................... 34
Tentative Residential Parcel Map with Waiver of Fihal Map .................. 34
Tentative Residential Parcel Map without Waiver of Final Map ................ 34
Single-Family Residential Tracts
Revised Tentative Subdivision Map (within two years of original approval) ......... 36
Revised Tentative Subdivision Map (after two years of original approval) .......... 36
Tentative Subdivision Map not in the R-2 or R-4 zone (sewers) ................ 35
Tentative Subdivision map in the R-2 or R-4 R-6 zone
..................... 36
R:ISIPI.-4N'NINCIIL,4NDFEF_~.NEW 13 Revi~ed June l, 1993 vgw
Page
Tentative Subdivision Map not in the R-2 or R-4 zone (sub-surface disposal) ........ 36
Vesting Tentative Map
Appeals (subdivision) .......................................... 37
Appeal (Extension of Time) ...................................... 37
Certificate of Land Division Compliance (fee per parcel) .................... 37
Certificate of Land Division Compliance with waiver of Final Parcel Map
(fee per parcel) .............................................. 37
Extension of Time (Subdivision)
Extension of Time (Parcel Map)
................................... 38
................................... 38
Land Division Unit map Filing (Phasing) .............................. 38
Lot Line Adjustment .......................................... 38
Minor Change (Subdivision) ...................................... 38
Minor Change (Parcel Map) ...................................... 38
Merger of Contiguous Parcels
..................................... 39
Reversion to Acreage .......................................... 39
Special Service Letter
.......................................... 39
Vesting Statutory Condominium Subdivision Map Filing .................... 37
Vesting Tentative Parcel Map ............. . ........................ 37
Vesting Tentative Single-Family Residential Tract
........................ 37
Amendment of Final Map
Air Quality Element Fee
........................................ 41
Filing Fees for Expired Recordable Subdivision Maps .................... 40-41
Final Subdivision Map Filing ..................................... 40
Final Statutory Condominium Map .................................. 41
Lot Revision After Checking ..................................... 39
R:~SIPLANNINGII..dNDFEE$.NEW 14 R~ed June 1, 1993 vgw
Page
Refund of Fees of Ordinance No. 460
................................ 41
Request for Extension of Time to Complete off-site improvements .............. 39
Statutory Condominium Subdivision and Single-Family Residential Tracts and
Parcel Maps ............................................... 39
Street Name Approval after prior approval (all schedules) ................... 39
ORDINANCE NO, oe46
Fire Safety Inspections (licensed care) ................................ 42
Plan Checks and Inspections - Fire
................................ 43-42
Fire Safety Insurance (Commercial/Industrial) ......................... 44-45
ORDINANCE NO, ot47
Filing of a Geologic Report for Approval ............................. 45
Waiver of Geologic Report ...................................... 45
ORDINANCE NO, oe,qoe
Appeal of Planning Commission Decision
Reclamation Plans submitted for vested operation conducted after 1/1/76 .......... 46
Revised Permit
Special Inspection Permit
....................................... 46
Substantial Conformance
............... · - ........................ 46
Surface Mining Permit
......................................... 46'
ORDINANCE NO, oc5'9
Application for a permit to remove one or more native living trees .............. 47
ORDINANCE NO, oe78
Appeals
.................................................. 48
Certificate of Historic Appropriateness
............................... 48
R.'ISIPLANN1NGLI..4NDFF_.ES. NEW 15 Ret.'ised June l, 1993 vlw
Page
ORDINANCE NO. 650
Holding Tank Approval ........................................ 50
For each Parcel not in the same Land Division, larger that 10,000 sq. ft. in size,
not in an identifies crucial area and where no site evaluation is required
(subsurface disposal system) ...................................... 49
For Multiple Parcels within the same Land Division (subsurface disposal systems) .... 49
Subsurface Sewage Disposal Plan re-review where a second review is needed
due to modifications, additions, or deletions to a previously approved design ........ 49
Preliminary Elective Evaluation of Sewage Disposal requirements prior to
application to Planning Department (includes evaluation of method of water supply) . . . 50
Alternative and experimental Sewage Disposal Systems including on-site evaluation
plan review
................................................ 49
Sewer Verification where readily retrievable data is not available (i.e. subdivision or
parcel map files) includes FHA/VA approval forms for systems less that 1 year ...... 50
Site Evaluation and Sewage Disposal Plan Review for individual lots less than
10,000 sq. ft. in size and located outside critical sub-surface Sewage Disposal areas . . . 49
Site Evaluation in conjunction with Sewage Disposal Plan Review in critical sub-surface
Sewage Disposal areas as determined by the health officer ................... 49
Site Evaluation upon request by applicant or his agent, to establish preliminary
conditions of approval or verify site conditions
.......................... 51
ORDINANCE NO. 653
Environmental Impact Report (EIR) ......... . ........................ 54
Filing a Record of Survey .
....................................... 51
Filing a Corner Record
......................................... 51
Establishment or enlargement of an Agriculture Preserve (Applicant Initiated) ....... 55
Establishment or enlargement of an Agricultural Preserve (City Council initiated) ..... 56
Execution of a Land Conservation contract for land within and Established Agricultural
Preserve (City Council Initiated) ................................... 55
Disestablished or Enlargement of an Agricultural Preserve (application initiated) ...... 55
R.'ISIPLANNINGLLANDFE~.NEW 16 Revia'ed June l, 1993 vgw
Page
Disestablished or Diminishment of an Agricultural Preserve (City Council initiated) .... 55
Annexation Fees
............................................. 58
Appeal to Planning Commission
................................... 53
Appeal to City Council
......................................... 54
Applications for Grading Permits
................................... 52
Applications for Commercial Wind Energy Conservation System Permits
(Commercial Wind Energy Conversion System Permits) ..................... 52
Applications for Tree Removal
.................................... 52
All other Applications (Initial Study Negative Declaration) ................... 52
Development Agreement ........................................ 58
If the Project Sponsor prepared the draft EIR
........................... 53
If pursuant to Section 706 of the rules for the City of Temecula implementing
the California Environmental Quality Act, a previously prepared EIR is utilized as
the draft EIR
............................................... 53
Fault Hazard Report Review (CEQA) ................................ 53
Geologic Waiver
............................................. 53
Landscaping Plans
............................................ 59
Liquefaction Report ........................................... 53
Notice of Non-Renewal
................ . ........................ 55
Projects Continued at Public Hearing ................................ 58
Public Hearing Fees
........................................... 58
Archival Research Fee for Planning Information
......................... 57
Research Fee for Planning Information
............................... 57
Research Fee for Historic Verification
............................... 57
Street Names
............................................... 56
Vacation of Public Streets, Highways Code Section 8300, ET. SEQ .............. 56
R.'IS~PI-..,4NNING~..ANDFF_~.NEW 17 Revised June l, 1993 vgw
CITY OF TEMECULA 'S FEE SCHEDULE
SECTION 1
The following fees shall be paid to the Public Works Department of the City of Temecula who shall make
disbursements to the proper funds and accounts.
1. CHECKING SERVICES
A. LEGAL DOCUMENTS
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Certificate of Correction ................................... $600
Certificate of Compliance ................................... 600
Certificate of Parcel Merger
Summary Vacation ................................. 600
............................... 920
Document Clearance and Processing ......... ' ....... 200
Condemnation (deposit)
Full General Vacation ................................... 2,000
.................................... 4,155
Public Dedications (not related to Map) .......................... 920
FINAL MAP CHECKING
Co
Parcel Map Except Schedule E
a. Planning Department ..........................54 + $1.00/lot
b. Public Works .............................750 + $20.00/1ot
c. Monument Review ................... 5% of mon. bond/S250 rain
d. Comprehensive Transportation Plan
......................... 4
Tract Maps and Schedule E Parcel Maps
a. Planning .................................101 + $1.00/lot
b. Public Works ...............................750 + $20/1ot
c. Monument Review ................... 5 % of mon. bond/S250 rain
d. Comprehensive Transportation Plan
......................... 8
3. Amended Maps (Parcel and Tract) ..................... (per sheet) 200
4. Fourth and subsequent submittal ....................... (per sheet) 100
3.
4.
5.
FEMA Study Review
a. CLOMR
b. LOMR ........................................ 5,000
c. LOMA ......................................... 1,000
Drainage up to 150 ac trib area
.............................. 1,200
Drainage over 150 ac trib area
............... :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Transportation Demand Management Study ........................ 250
R:ISiPLANNINGLLANDFEE$.NEW 18 Revised June l, 1993 yew
CITY OF TEMECULA 'S FEE SCHEDULE
FEES
D,
PLAN CHECKING
The initial submittal of improvement plans and f'mal maps for Public Works Department review shall be
accompanied by the design engineer's opinion of construction security cost estimate (based upon City of Temecula
Public Works Department Construction Security Worksheet) and full payment of land development checking fees
as specified herein. The Public Works Department shall approve the final construction cost estimate and establish
the final plan check fee. Should the initially submitted plan checking fees be determined to be inadequate, the
balance due shall be paid prior to the approval of any maps or plans.
1. Improvement Plans
Onsite - Fees shown in percent of final construction cost
estimate 4% of 1st $20,000
3.5% of next 80,000
3.25% over 100,000
Offsite - Fees shown' in percent of final construction cost estimate
4% of 1st 20,000
3.5% of next 80,000
3.25% over 100,00
Revisions - Fee shown or as directed by the City Engineer
200/sheet
Grading Plans
a,
One lot residential
(0-500 cy) 300
(over 500 cy) 500
b,
Plot Plans, Conditional Use Permits, Public Use Permits (0-5,000 cy) 500
(5,001-100,000 cy) 750
(+ $50 for each additional 10,000 cy over 100,000 cy) 1,000
C,
Stockpile
(0-5,000 cy) 300
(5,001-100,000 cy) 400
(over 100,000 cy) 500
Subdivisions
a,
Rough Grading Plan (0-5,000 cy) 500
(5,001-100,000 cy) 750
(+ $50 for each additional 10,000 cy over 100,000) 1,000
Precise Grading Plan
(up to 50 lots) 5/1ot
(+ $4/1ot, 51-100 lots) 250
(+ $3/1ot over 100 lots) 450
Plan Revision, fee shown or as directed by the Public Works Department
200/sheet
R"~S~PLANNING~rDFFI:~-NEW 19 Revised June l, 1993 vgw
CITY OF TEMECULA 'S FEE SCHEDULE
CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION
Fees for Construction Observation shall be paid prior to the issuance of the permit
A. IMPROVEMENTS
B,
,
ROUGH GRADING
PERMITS
Offsite and onsite parking lots - fees shown in percent of final construction cost estimate
4% of 1st $20,000
3.5% of next 80,000
3.25% of mount over 100,000
Overtime
cost plus 10%
(0-500 cy) 350
(501-10,000 cy) 500
(10,001-100,000 cy) 1,000
(over 100,000 cy) 1,300 + 50/10,000
over 100,001 cy
A,
B,
CONSTRUCTION - each fee listed herein includes a $25 issuance fee
1. Concrete Sidewalk
........................... 75 + 0.05/If over 100'
2. Pedestrian Bench
.........................................
3. Bus Stop Area (final construction cost estimate) ................ 25 + 5 %
4. Drainage Structure ............................... 25 + 500/each
5. Bridge (final construction cost estimate)
6. Parkway Drain ...................... 25 + 5%
7. Concrete Gutter ........................................... 65
................................... 75 + 0.15/If
8. Street Light (final construction cost estimate) ................... 25 + 5%
9. Commercial Driveway ..................................... 100
10. Residential Driveway
11. Curb/Curb and Gutter ....................................... 75
75 + 0.15/If
12. Excavation/Street Crossi'ni ......... ' .................... 1/lf (125 rain)
13. Excavation/Parall el ...........................
.............................. 0.25/1f (125 min)
OTHER PERMITS - each fee listed herein includes a $25 issuance fee
2.
3.
4.
,
Block Party ............................................. 25
Movie Filming .................................... 25 + 50/day
Tree Trimming ................................... 25 + 50/each
Utility Company
a. Blanket Permit 1
.......................... 25/month + 10/cut
b. Blanket Permit 2
.......................... 100/year + 20/cut
c. Minor/Major Construction Project ..................... 100/sheet
(or as determined by the Department of Public Works)
Service Cuts
.............................. 25 + 1/If of excavation
R.'LS~PLANNING~L4NDFEFj. NEW 20 Revised June 1, 1993 vgw
CITY OF TEMECULA 'S FEE SCHEDULE
C,
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
FEES
Main Line
..... 25 + 1/If of excavation (or as determined by the Department of Public Works)
USA Service No Fee
Street Closures
................................. $25 + 50/cal day
Pedestrian Protection
...................................... 125
Blockwall (incl. retaining) Final construction cost estimate ........... 25 + 5 70
Miscellaneous Construction ..... 5 + amt.determined by Public Works Department
Transportation Permits, oversized or overweight vehicles
a. Annual Permit
...................................... 60
b. Single Trip Permit
................................... 25
Any Permit issuance where inspection fees are paid under previous sections ..... 25
SPECIAL DISTRICTS ADMINISTRATION
Land and Assessment Division Applications
with Amended Assessment Diagram ..................... 375 + 15/parcel
Land and Assessment Division Applications without
Amended Assessment Diagrams ....................... 575 + 15/parcel
Special Districts Formation/Application .............. 170 of bond issue cost
(2,000 initial cost)
R.'~SiPLANNINGILANDFEES. NEW 21 Revised June 1. 1993 vgw
CITY OF TEMECULA 'S FEE SCHEDULE
SECTION 2
The fees for Ordinance No. 348, relating to land use shall be as follows:
The following fees shall be paid to the Planning Department of the City of Temecula who shall make
disbursement to the appropriate funds and accounts:
1. ADMINISTRATIVE PLOT PLAN
,
,
A. Planning .................................................. $176
B. Public Works
1. Comprehensive Transportation Plan
.............................. 14
APPEALS TO PLANNING COMMISSION, CITY COUNCIL
Planning .................................................. 325
Fire (if conditions are appealed) .................................... 215
Public Works (if conditions are appealed) .............................. 435
1. Comprehensive Transportation Plan .............................. 26
CHANGE OF ZONE
,
A,
B.
C.
D.
Planning ..........
Environmental Health ........................................2,746
Fire ............ [~[~[~[[~[[[[~[~[~[5~[[~~. 63
Public Works ................................................336
1. Traffic Study, if required 300
................................... 780
2. Comprehensive Transportation Plan ............................. 220
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
,
B.
C.
D.
E.
Planning ..................................................
Environmental Health .3,815
BFiuri; ......................................... 102
...................................................... 531
ding and Safety .................. ' ........................... 30
Public Works .................................... 1,086 + $5/1ot or site
1. Traffic Study, if required '
................................... 780
2. Comprehensive Transportation Plan ............................. 305
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (MINOR)
A,
C,
Planning ..................................................
Public Works ................................................ $590
1. Comprehensive Transportation Plan 155
Environmental Health .............................. 47
Fire ........................................... 57
....................................................... 96'
R:ISIPLANNINGbLANDFEEXNEW 22 Revised June l, 1993 vgw
CITY OF TEMECULA 'S FEE SCHEDULE
,
10.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (MOBILE HOME PARK)
A.
B.
C.
D.
FEES
Planning ........................
Environmental Health ......................... $3,533
~ ........... '; ..... ; .................................. 102
531
i~ wo~k~ ....:' :-:::::. :::::::::::::::::::::::: ~ :,' ~/io; g~ .i,~
1. Traffic Study, if required ' ' ' '
................................... 780
2. Comprehensive Transportation Plan ............................. 283
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (RECREATIONAL VEHICLE PARK)
B.
C.
D.
E.
Planning .................................................. 3,190
Environmental Health
Fire ............:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: lo2
l~u%lll~c531
Works ......:. i'~6 ~' ~/io; ~,r si,e
1. Traffic Study, if required ....... '
.................................. 780
2. Comprehensive Transportation Plan ............................ 255
EXTENSION OF TIME - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS
A,
B.
C.
D.
Planning .............
Environmental Health ...................................... 352
113
Public Works ................................................ 225
1. Traffic Study, if required
................................... 780
2. Comprehensive Transportation Plan .............................. 28
EXTENSION OF TIME - PLOT PLANS
A,
B.
C.
D.
Planning ................................................... 352
Environmental Health ........................ . ................... 69
Fire ...................................................... 113
Public Works ................................................ 225
1. Traffic Study, if required '
................................... 780
2. Comprehensive Transportation Plan .............................. 28
EXTENSION OF TIME - PUBLIC USE PERMITS
A,
B.
C.
D.
Planning ...................................................
Environmental Health 307
Fire .......... ' .......................................... 69
............................................ 113
Public Works ................................................225.
1. Traffic Study, if required
................................... 780
2. Comprehensive Transportation Plan .............................. 25
R.'IS~PLANNING~L4NDFFANEW 23 Revistd June 1, 1~3 vgw
CITY OF TEMECULA 'S FEE SCHEDULE
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
EXTENSION OF TIME - VARIANCES
FEES
A. Planning ..................................................
B. Environmental Health $261
D. Public Works 113
1. Comprehensive Transportation Plan
.............................. 21
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT FILED WITH A SPECIFIC PLAN
A. Planning ..................................................
B. Environmental Health 4, 128
D. Parks ..................................................... 366
E. Public Works ........................................... 355
..... 368
1. Comprehensive Transportation Plan ............................. 330
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT FILED WITHOUT A SPECIFIC PLAN
A. Planning .......................................... 4,249 + $38/acre
B. Environmental Health
D. Parks ..................................................... 366
E. Public Works ................................................ 355
368
1. Comprehensive Transportation Plan ............................. 340
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT - Circulation
A. Public Works
............................................... 3,906
REVISED PERMITS WHICH DO NOT REQUIRE A PUBLIC HEARING
A. Planning ................................................... 273
B. Fire ....................................................... 96
C. Public Works ...................... ' .......................... 105
1. Traffic Study, if required
................................... 780
2. Comprehensive Transportation Plan .............................. 22
REVISED PERMITS WHICH REQUIRE A PUBLIC HEARING
Planning ...........................
Fire ..................
Public Works ................................................ 94
1. Traffic Study, if required 155
................................... 780
2. Comprehensive Transportation Plan .............................. 47
A,
R.'~SIPLANNING~,,4NDFEES. NEW
24 Revised June l, 1993 vgw
CITY OF TEMECULA 'S FEE SCHEDULE
17.
18.
19.
20.
CERTIHCATE OF ZONING COMPLIANCE AND PLOT PLANS WHICH REQUIRE HELD
INSPECTION BY LAND USE DIVISIONS
A. Planning .................................................. $253
B. Director's Hearing for Outdoor Advertising per application (additional charge) ....... 262
C. Building and Safety
D. Public Works ............................................. 30
1. Comprehensive Transportation Plan .............................. 20
2. (additional charge for Outdoor Advertising per application
for a Director's Hearing per application) ........................... 21
PLOT PLANS FOR PROJECTS WHICH ARE EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA), ARE UNDER 10,000 SQUARE FEET BUT ARE
REQUIRED TO BE TRANSMITtED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO OTHER
GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES FOR REVIEW
A. Planning .............
B. Environmental Health ...................................... 548
1. Traffic Study, if required ................................... 780
2. Comprehensive Transportation Plan .............................. 44
PLOT PLANS FOR PROJECTS WHICH ARE EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) AND ARE NOT REVIEWED BY ANY
GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES OTHER THAT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT
A. Planning ................................................... 176
B. Public Works
I. Traffic Study, if required
................................... 780
2. Comprehensive Transportation Plan .............................. 14
PLOT PLANS WHICH ARE NOT EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL
QUALITY ACT (CEQA) (PROJECTS UNDER 10,00.0 SQUARE FEET)
Planning ........................................... . ......
Environmental Health 1,483
Fire .......................................... 117
1. Traffic Study, if required
................................... 780
2. Comprehensive Transportation Plan ............................. 119
B.
C.
D.
R.'XSIPL.,iNNINGLr..4NDrT_F~.NEW 25 Revised June 1, 1993 vgw
CITY OF TEMECULA 'S FEE SCHEDULE
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
FEE___ S
PLOT PLANS WHICH ARE NOT EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL
QUALITY ACT (CEQA) (PROJECTS OVER 10,000 SQUARE FEET)
A. Planning .................................................$3,815
B. Environmental Health
c. ............ ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::7
D. Public Works ...............................................1 086
1. Comprehensive Transportation Plan ............................. ' 119
PUBLIC USE PERMIT
B.
C.
D.
Planning ..................................................
Environmental Health 3,707
Public Works ............................................... 1,053
1. Comprehensive Transportation Plan ............................. 297
Parks
..................................................... 355
PUBLIC USE PERMIT (MINOR)
A,
C,
Planning .................................................. $590
Public Works ................................................ 155
1. Comprehensive Transportation Plan .............................. 47
Environmental Health
Fire ........................................... 57
SECOND UNIT
A,
B.
C.
D.
Planning ..................................................
Environmental Health 1,772
Fire ............
Public Works ................................................ 335
489
1. Comprehensive Transportation Plan ............................. 142
SETBACK ADJUSTMENT
A,
Planning ...................................................
Public Works 250
1. Comprehensive Transportation Plan
.............................. 20
SPECIFIC PLAN OF LAND USE
A,
B.
C.
D.
E,
Planning ........................................... 9,254 + $33/ga
Environmental Health '
Public Works ..... .......................................... 2,905
1. Comprehensive Transportation Plan ............................. 740
Parks
.................................................... 2,000
R.' [S~P~NG~.,ANDFEE$. NEIV
26 Revised June 1, 1993 vgw
CITY OF TEMECULA'S FEE SCHEDULE
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
FEES
SPECIFIC PLAN- ROAD SPECIFIC PLAN
A. Public Works
............................................... $4,039
SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMANCE FOR PERMITS UNDER SECTION 18.43 OF ORDINANCE NO.
348
A. Planning ...........................................
B. Public Works ......... 343
1. Comprehensive Transportation Plan
............................... 27
SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMANCE FOR SPECIFIC PLANS
B.
C.
D.
Planning ................................................... 1,319
Environmental Health ............................................. 57
Fire
138
1. Comprehensive Transportation Plan .............................. 106
Parks
...................................................... 75
TEMPORARY SIGN PERMIT
A. Planning ..................................................... 20
TEMPORARY USE PERMIT NOT TO EXCEED SIX MONTHS
A. Planning ................................................... 1,407
B. Environmental Health ............................................. 59
C. Fire
D. Building and Saie/y .............................................. 140
.............................................. 30
E. Public Works .................................................147
1. Comprehensive Transportation Plan .............................. 113
VARIANCE FILED SIMULTANEOUSLy WITH AN APPLICATION FOR A LAND DIVISION,
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, OR PLOT PLAN
A,
B.
C.
D.
Planning .................................................... 571
Environmental Health ............................................. 56
Fire
1. Comprehensive Transportation Plan ............................... 46
VARIANCE FILED ALONE
B.
C.
D.
E.
Planning .......................... ......................... 1,476
Environmental Health ............................................. 56
Fire
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Public Works
1. Comprehensive Transportation Plan
.............................. 118
R:t,SlPLANNINGIIANDFEE~.NEW 27 Revised June 1, 1993 vgw
CITY OF TEMECULA'S FEE SCHEDULE
35.
36.
38.
39.
FEES
ACCESSORY WIND ENERGY CONVERSION SYSTEM EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA)
A. Planning .................................................. $372
B. Fire .............................................. 360
C. Public Works ........
1. Comprehensive Transportation Plan
.............................. 30
ACCESSORY Wind Energy Conversion System NOT EXEMPt FROM THE CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA)
A. Planning ...................................................
B. Fire ...................................................... 553
C. Public Works 360
1. Comprehensive Transportation Plan
COMMERCIAL Wind Energy Conversion System PERMIT
A,
B.
C.
D.
Planning .................................................. 3,045
Environmental Health
Fire .......... ' .......................................... 54
3
Public works .... ' ........................................... 60
1. Comprehensi~,; ZF;a~l;o~t'if;n'l~l~ ............................. 668
Wind Energy Conversion System NOISE STUDY
A,
Environmental Health
..................................... 500 deposit
ZONING INFORMATION LETTER
A,
Planning .................................................... 18
Public Works
1. Comprehensive Transportation Plan .............................. 1
LARGE FAMILY DAY CARE HOME
B.
C.
D.
Planning .............................................. ~ .... 436
Environmental Health
Fire ........ ' .......................................... 83
Pub|it Works.. ~]]~]~]~ ..................................... 5S
1. Traffic Study, if reqUir~ ................................... 1,~78
................................... 780
2. Comprehensive Transportation Plan .............................. 35
R:~Sh°LANNING~L'4NDFEE$'NEW 28 Revised June 1, 1993 vgw
CITY OF TEMECULA 'S FEE SCHEDULE
40.
41.
42.
43.
45.
_.FEES
HAZARDOUS WASTE FACILITY SITING PERMIT
A. Planning ..........................................$10,683 + $36/ga
B. Environmental Health
.................................... 1,000 deposit
C. Public Works ...............................................1,214
1. Traffic Study, if required ................................... 641
2. Comprehensive Transportation Plan ....................... 855 + $3/ga
KENNELS AND CATrERIES WHICH ARE PROCESSED UNDER SECTION 18.45
A. Planning ........................
B. · ........................ 331
Environmental Health ' '
C. Public Works ........................................... 42
I. Comprehensive Transportation Plan
.............................. 26
MINOR TEMPORARY OUTDOOR EVENT WHICH IS EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA)
B.
C.
D.
Planning .............
Environmental Health ....................................... 15
Sheriffs ........................................... 57
8
1. Comprehensive Transportation Plan .............................. 8
MINOR TEMPORARY OUTDOOR EVENT WHICH IS NOT EXEMPT FROM THE
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA)
C,
Planning ...............
Environmental Health .................................... 424
168
1. Comprehensive Transportation Plan .............................. 34
MAJOR OUTDOOR EVENT
B.
C.
D.
Planning ......................... ' ...........................
Public Works ................................................. 65
8
Sheriff .......
Environmental Heai ............................................ 27
........................................... 57
REGULARLY SCHEDULED EVENT WHICH IS PREEXISTING AND EXEMPT FROM THE
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA)
Planning ....................................................
Public Works ................................................. 73
6
R" ISh°LANNING~I"ANDFE'ES' NEW 29 Revised June 1, 1993
CITY OF TEMECULA 'S FEE SCHEDULE
47.
48.
49.
50.
REGULARLY SCHEDULED EVENT WHICH HAS NOT BEEN HELD BEFORE AND IS
EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA)
A. Planning .................................................. $789
B. Public Works
1. Comprehensive Transportation Plan
REGULARLY SCHEDULED EVENT WHICH HAS NOT BEEN HELD BEFORE AND IS NOT
EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA)
A. Planning ................................................... 850
B. Public Works
1. Comprehensive Transportation Plan
SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMANCE FOR COMMERCIAL AND ACCESSORY Wind Energy
Conversion System PERMITS
A. Planning ................................................... 407
B. Public Works
1. Comprehensive Transportation Plan
.............................. 33
ORDINANCE NO. 348 CONSISTENCY DETERMINATION FOR KENNELS
A,
Planning .................................................... 25
Public Works
I. Comprehensive Transportation Plan .............................. 2
Whenever an application for a change of zone, permit, or variance is terminated for any reason,
the Planning Department may, in accordance with the Refund Policy Statement adopted by the
City Council, refund fees paid, upon the written request of the applicant. If any portion of the
application fees have been paid by the Planning Department to another jurisdiction, agency, or
department for the performance of services related to the application, the Planning Department
will not refund any such portion of their fees until the other jurisdiction, agency, or department
authorizes the Planning Department to do so. In the absence of such authorization, it will be the
applicant's responsibility to contact the other jurisdiction, agency, or department for a refund of
the fees paid to it, in accordance with the Refund Policy Statement.
REFUND OF FEES - ORDINANCE NO. 348
The Planning Department shall retain a processing fee of
$75.00 from the total amount to be refunded.
............................. 75
R:ISiPL4NNINGLL4NDFEF. S. NEW 30 Revistd June 1, 1993 vgw
CITY OF TEMECULA 'S FEE SCHEDULE
_FEES
SECTION 3
The fees for Ordinance No. 431, regulating and controlling the location and operation of hog ranches, shall be
as follows:
,
1. NEW PERMIT APPLICATION FEE
Planning ............ . . . $1,639
Public Works ..................................
1. Comprehensive Transportation Plan
............................. 131
INSPECTION FEE
A,
Planning .................... 16 per 100 hogs min of $127
Public Works ...............
1. Comprehensive Transportation Plan .............. 1 per 100 hogs rain of $10
LATE FEE
A. Planning ............
B. Public Works ...................... 25% of required inspection fee
1. Comprehensive Transportation Plan ............. 2 % of required inspection fee
AMENDMENT OF PERMIT (CHANGE IN NUMBER OF HOGS AT PERMITTEE'S OPTION)
A. Planning .................................................... 26
B. Public Works
1. Comprehensive Transportation Plan
.............................. 2
AMENDMENT OF PERMIT (INCREASE IN MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE NUMBER OF HOGS)
A. Planning ................................................... 169
B. Public Works
1. Comprehensive Transportation Plan
· "- ........................... 14
R.' tS ~ PLANNIN G ~IND FEE.$. NEW
Revised June 1, 1993 vRw
CITY OF TEMECULA 'S FEE SCHEDULE
FEES
SECTION 4
The fees for Ordinance No. 458, Relating to the regulation of flood hazard areas and implementing the National
Flood Insurance Program, shall be as follows:
APPLICATIONS INVOLVING LAND WHICH LIES WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE
MAPS DESCRIBED IN SECTION 3 OF ORDINANCE NO. 458, EXCLUDING PARAGRAPH E
,
A. Public Works
.................................... $410 + $180/bldg site
APPLICATIONS INVOLVING LAND WHICH LIES WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE
MAPS DESCRIBED IN SECTION 3, PARAGRAPH E ORDINANCE 458
A. Public Works
..................................... 410 + $180foldg site
APPLICATION FOR AN APPEAL OR VARIANCE
A. City Clerk .................................... · .............. 60
R:iSXPLANNING~t. ANDFEE.$.NEW 32 Revised June 1, 1993 vlw
CITY OF TEMECULA 'S FEE SCHEDULE
SECTION S
.FEES
The fees for Ordinance No. 460, relating to the division of land shall be as follows:
The following fees shall be paid to the Planning Director of the City of Temecula who will disburse the fees to
the appropriate funds and accounts.
MUL TI-FAMIL Y RESIDENTIAL TRACTS
,
,
TENTATIVE STATUTORY CONDOMINIUM SUBDIVISION MAP FILING (SEWERS)
A. Planning ................................... $4,764 + $65/unit + $21/ga
B. Environmental Health
D. Public Works .......................................... 877 + $8/ga
1. Traffic Study, if required
................................... 780
2. Comprehensive Transportation Plan ................ 381 + $5/unit + $2/ga
TENTATIVE STATUTORY CONDOMINIUM SUBDIVISION MAP FILING (SUB-SURFACE
DISPOSAL)
A. Planning ....................................4,764+ $65/unit + $2 1 /ga
B. Environmental Health
......................................... 1,144
C. Fire ......................................................544
D. Public Works ..........................................900 + $8/ga
1. Traffic Study, if required
................................... 780
2. Comprehensive Transportation Plan ................ 381 + $5/unit + $2/ga
REVISED STATUTORY CONDOMINIUM SUBDIVISION MAP FILING (WITHIN TWO YEARS
OF ORIGINAL APPROVAL)
A. Planning ..............................5,131 + $70/add unit + $22/add ga
B. Environmental Health
C. Fire ............ ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ~
D. Public Works ................................................300
1. Traffic Study, if required ...................................780
2. Comprehensive Transportation Plan ........... 410 + $6/add unit + $2/add ga
REVISED STATUTORY CONDOMINIUM SUBDIVISION MAP FILING (AFTER TWO YEARS
OF ORIGINAL APPROVAL)
B.
C.
D.
Planning .............................. 5,131 + $70/add unit + $22/add ga
Environmental Health
Public Works ................................................ 300
1, Traffic Study, if required ...................................780
2. Comprehensive Transportation Plan ........... 410 + $6/add unit + $2/add ga
R.' iSXPLANNING~IDFF_.F_.X NEW 33 Revised June l, 1993 vgw
CITY OF TEMECULA 'S FEE SCHEDULE
FEES
/"~ARCEL MAPS
,
,
TENTATIVE COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL PARCEL MAP (SEWERS)
B.
C.
D.
PIning .................................... $2,980 + $20/Iot + $20/ga
Environmental Health
· ' ......................................... 510
2. Comprehensive Transportation Plan ................. 238 + $2/lot + $2/ga
Parks
.............. .............................. , ........ 355
TENTATIVE RESIDENTIAL PARCEL MAP WITH WAIVER OF HNAL MAP
B.
C.
D.
Planning ........................................... 1,332 + $86/1ot
Environmental Health
· ' ......................................... 372
c Study, if i
2. · ·
Survey ............................................... 260
3. Comprehensive Transportation Plan ....................... 107 + $7/1ot
Parks
..................................................... 355
TENTATIVE RESIDENTIAL PARCEL MAP WITHOUT WAIVER OF FINAL MAP
B.
C.
D.
E,
Planning ...........................................1,213 + $90/1ot
Environmental Health
.......................................... 396
Fire ......................................................547
Public Works ..........................................618 + $5/1ot
I. Traffic Study, if required
................................... 780
2. Comprehensive Transportation Plan ........................ 97 + $7/1ot
Parks
..................................................... 355
REVISED PARCEL MAP HLING (RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL
PARCEL MAPS; WITHIN TWO YEARS OF ORIGINAL APPROVAL)
A,
B.
C.
D.
Planning ......................................... 351 + $84/add lot
Environmental Health
............ :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: 14o
Public Works ................................................ 159
248
1. Traffic Study, if required
................................... 780
2. Comprehensive Transportation Plan ..................... 28 + $7/add lot
Parks
..................................................... 178
R:IS!PLANNING~ANDFEE&NEW 34 Revised June l, 1993 vgw
CITY OF TEMECULA 'S FEE SCHEDULE
FEES
REVISED PARCEL MAP FILING (COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL PARCEL MAPS AFTER
TWO YEARS OF ORIGINAL APPROVAL)
10.
D,
E,
Planning ........................................ $351 + $44/add lot
Environmental Health ................... ~ ......................140
Fire ...................................................... 170
Public Works ................................................ 318
1. Traffic Study, if required ................................... 780
2. Comprehensive Transportation Plan ........................ 28 + $4/lot
Parks
..................................................... 178
REVISED RESIDENTIAL PARCEL MAP (AFTER TWO YEARS OF ORIGINAL APPROVAL)
A,
B.
C.
D.
Planning ............ .
Environmental Health ............................ 414 + $100/add lot
Public Works ........................................ 113
........ 318
1. Traffic Study, if required
................................... 780
2. Comprehensive Transportation Plan ..................... 33 + $8/add lot
Parks
..................................................... 178
SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TRACTS
11.
12.
TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP NOT IN THE R-2 OR R-4 ZONE (SEWERS)
A,
B.
C.
D.
E,
Planning ....................................2,857 + $82/1ot + $20/ga
Environmental Health
.......................................... 510
Fire ............ 544
1. Traffic Study, if required
................................... 780
2. Comprehensive Transportation Plan .................. 229 + $7/1ot + 2/ga
Parks
.................................. ................... 355
TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP IN THE R-2 OR R4 ZONE
A,
B.
C.
D.
E.
F,
Planning .................................... 4,990 + $90/1ot + $21/ga
Environmental Health
Building and Safety ............................................. 24
Public Works ......................................... 1,496 + $5/1ot
1. Traffic Study, if required
2. Comprehensive Transportation Plan ................. 399 + $7/1ot + $
Parks
..................................................... 355
R:ISIPLANNINGLLANDFF_.~.NEW 35 Revised June 1, 1993 vgw
CITY OF TEMECULA 'S FEE SCHEDULE
14.
TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP NOT IN THE R-2 OR R-4 ZONE (SUB-SURFACE DISPOSAL)
A. Planning ....................................$2,857 + $82/1ot + $20/ga
B. Environmental Health
......................................... 1,144
C. Fire ......................................................544
Do Public Works .........................................1,496 + $5/1ot
1. Traffic Study, if required ................................... 780
2. Comprehensive Transportation Plan ................. 229 + $7/1ot + $2/ga
Parks
..................................................... 355
REVISED TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP (WITHIN TWO YEARS OF ORIGINAL
APPROVAL)
B.
C.
D.
Planning ............................... 2,798 +$62/add lot + $19/add ga
Environmental Health
Public Works ................................................ 318
1. Comprehensive Transportation Plan ............ 224 + $5/add lot + $2 add ga
Parks
..................................................... 355
15. REVISED TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP (AFTER TWO YEARS OF ORIGINAL APPROVAL)
A,
B.
C.
D.
E,
Planning ...............................2,798 + $62/add lot + $19/add ga
Environmental Health
....................................... :.. 194
Fire ......................................................178
Public Works ................................................318
1. Comprehensive Transportation Plan ............ 224 + $5/add lot + $2/add ga
Parks
..................................................... 355
VESTING TENTATIVE MAP
16.
VESTING STATUTORY CONDOMINIUM SUBDIVISION MAP HLING
A,
B.
C.
D.
E,
Planning .................................... 4,983 + $90/unit+ $21/ga
Environmental Health ......................... ~ ...............1,144
Fire ...................................................... 544
Public Works ........................................ 1,574 + $63/ac
1. Traffic Study, if required ................................... 780
2. Comprehensive Transportation Plan ................ 399 + $7/unit + $2/ga
Parks
..................................................... 355
R:XSIPLANNINGXI..4NDFF2S. NEW 36 Revised June 1, 1993 vgw
CITY OF TEMECULA 'S FEE SCHEDULE
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
VESTING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP
A. Planning .................................... $4,846 + $88/1ot + $21/ga
B. Environmental Health
c. Fi~ ............
D. Public Works ........................................ 1,574 + $57/Iot
1. Traffic Study, if required ................................... 780
2. Comprehensive Transportation Plan ................. 388 + $7/lot + $2/ga
E. Parks
..................................................... 355
VESTING TENTATIVE SINGLE-FAMILy RESIDENTIAL TRACT
A. Planning .................................... 4,698 + $84/1ot + $20/ga
B. Environmental Health
D. Public Works ........................................ 1 574 +$57/1ot
1. Traffic Study, if required '
............ ~Z~ZZZ~Z~' ' '$
2.Comprehensive Tr~spo~a~io. Pl~ ....Z~ ~ ~i~'~
E. Parks ' '
..................................................... 355
APPEALS (SUBDIVISION)
A,
Planning ...................................................
Fire (If fire conditions are appealed) ................................. 331
215
Public Works ................................................ 126
1. Comprehensive Transportation Plan .............................. 26
APPEAL (EXTENSION OF TIME)
A. Planning ................................................... 331
B. Public Works
1. Comprehensive Transportation Plan
..............................
CERTIFICATE OF LAND DIVISION COMPLIANCE (FEE PER PARCEL)
A. Planning ...................................................
B. Environmental Health356
c. Vire ............:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: 126
D. Public Works 104
1. Comprehensive Transportation Plan
.............................. 8
CERTIFICATE OF LAND DIVISION COMPLIANCE WITH WAIVER OF FINAL PARCEL MAP
(FEE PER PARCEL)
A,
Planning ...................................................
Fire .......... ' ............................................ 100
Public Works 104
I. Comprehensive Transportation Plan
.............................. 28
R.' ISIPLANNINGLLANDFEES. NEW
37 Revised June 1, 1993 vgw
CITY OF TEMECULA 'S FEE SCHEDULE
24.
25.
27.
28.
EXTENSION OF TIME (SUBDIVISION)
A,
B.
C.
D.
Planning ..................................................$268
Environmental Health
........................................... 69
Fire ......................................................113
Public Works .............................................200
1. Comprehensive Transportation Plan ......................... ~. ~. 21
EXTENSION OF TIME (PARCEL MAP)
B.
C.
D.
Planning .....................................
Environmental Health .............. 274
............
Public Works ................................................ 200
1. Comprehensive Transportation Plan .............................. 22
LAND DIVISION UNIT MAP FILING (PHASING)
Planning ................................................... 187
Fire ...................................................... 104
Public Works ................................................ 147
1. Comprehensive Transportation Plan .............................. 15
LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT
Planning ................................................... 430
Environmental Health
1. Comprehensive Transportation Plan .............................. 34
MINOR CHANGE (SUBDIVISION)
Planning ................................................... 470
Fire ............................ . ..........................
Public Works ................................................ 104
124
1. Traffic Study, if required
................................... 780
2. Comprehensive Transportation Plan .............................. 38
MINOR CHANGE (PARCEL MAP)
Ao
Planning ................................................... 459
Fire ......................................................
Public Works ................................................ 104
124
1. Traffic Study, if required
................................... 780
2. ComPrehensive Transportation Plan .............................. 37
R.'IShW-,4NNINGtl. ANDrT_.ES. NEW -~8 Revist~l June l, 1993 vgw
CITY OF TEMECULA 'S FEE SCHEDULE
29.
30.
MERGER OF CONTIGUOUS PARCELS
Planning
Public W~r~ ............................................... $500
1. Survey ................................................ 65
2. Comprehensive Transportation Plan .............................. 40
REVERSION TO ACREAGE
31.
B.
C.
D.
Planning ...................................................392
Environmental Health
........................................... 69
Fire ......................................................104
Public Works
1. Comprehensive Transportation Plan
.............................. 32
SPECIAL SERVICE LETTER
A,
Planning ................................................... 183
Public Works
1. Comprehensive Transportation Plan .............................. 15
AMENDMENT OF FINAL MAP
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
STATUTORY CONDOMINIUM SUBDIVISION AND SINGLE-FAMILy RESIDENTIAL TRACTS
A. Planning ................................ 1,709 + $18/1ot change + $10/ga
B. Public ~oo~sp ............................................... 1,350
1. rehensive Transportation Plan ............ 137 + $1/lot change + $1/ga
PARCEL MAPS
A. Planning ..................................... 1,592 + $16/1ot + $9/ga
B. Public Works ............................................... 1,200
1. Comprehensive Transportation Plan ........................ 127 + $1/lot
REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO COMPLETE OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS
A. Public Works
................................................ 147
STREET NAME APPROVAL AFTER PRIOR APPROVAL (ALL SCHEDULES)
A. Public Works
..................................... 70 + $10/add street
LOT REVISION AFTER CHECKING
A,
Public Works
.............................................. $20/1ot
R.'LS~PI. ANNING~INDFEF_.5. NEW ..~9 Revi.~t~d June l, 1993 vgw
CITY OF TEMECULA 'S FEE SCHEDULE
~' 7LING FEES FOR EXPIRED RECORDABLE SUBDM SION MAPS
FEES
If a tentative tract map is submitted to the Planning Director within 90 days of the expiration date of an expired
recordable subdivision map on the same property and the new tentative tract map is no different than the lines
of the expired map, the land divider shall pay the f~ing fees specified in this subsection.
37..
IN LIEU OF THE FILING FEES PROVIDED FOR SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TRACTS
IN SUBPARAGRAPHS A~ B, AND C OF PARAGRAPH 3 OF SUBSECTION B OF THIS
SECTION, THE FOLLOWING FEES SHALL BE PAID:
38.
A. Planning .................................... $1,681 + $15/lot + $15/ga
B. Public Works .......................................... 750 + $5/1ot
1. Comprehensive Transportation Plan ................. 134 + $1/lot + $1/ga
IN LIEU OF THE FILING FEES PROVIDED FOR MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TRACTS
IN SUBPARAGRAPHS A AND B OF PARAGRAPH 1 OF SUBSECTION B OF THIS SECTION,
THE FOLLOWING FEES SHALL BE PAID:
39.
1. Planning ...................................... 1,829 + $16/ga
2. Public Works ..................................... 750 + $8/ga
a. Comprehensive Transportation Plan .................. 146 + $1/ga
IN LIEU OF THE FILING FEES PROVIDED FOR IN PARAGRAPHS tl AND 6 OF
SUBSECTION D OF THIS SECTION, THE FOLLOWING FEES SHALL BE PAID:
r INAL SUBDIVISION MAP FILING
A,
Planning ............................................. 101 + $1/lot
Public Works .......................................... 603 + $5/1ot
1. Comprehensive Transportation Plan .............................. 8
FINAL STATUTORY CONDOMINIUM MAP
40.
41.
C,
Planning ............................................. 101 + $1/lot
Public Works Up to 10 ae gross .......... ' ............ 600 + $25/ga 1,250 max
1. Comprehensive Transportation Plan .............................. 8 '
FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS SUBSECTION, AN EXPIRED RECORDABLE SUBDIVISION
MAP SHALL MEAN AN APPROVED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP FOR WHICH APPROVED
IMPROVEMENT PLANS AND MYLARS HAD BEEN SUBMITFED TO THE CITY ENGINEER,
THE FINAL MAP WAS READY FOR SIGNATURE, AND THE FINAL MAP COULD HAVE
BEEN RECORDED ON THE SUBMISSION OF APPROVED SECURITY AND AGREEMENTS.
THE DETERMINATION OF WHETHER ANY MAP CONSTITUTES AN EXPIRED
RECORDABLE SUB-DIVISION MAP SHALL BE MADE BY THE CITY ENGINEER.
NOTHING CONTMNED IN THE SUBSECTION SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED TO PREVENT OR
PROHIBIT THE IMPOSITION OF ADDITIONAL OR DIFFERENT CONDITIONS ON THE
NEW TENTATIVE MAP. THE FILING FEES CONTMNED IN THE SUBSECTION SHALL BE
APPLICABLE IF ANY CHANGES OR ALTERNATIVES ARE REQUIRED TO BE MADE TO
R.'iSXPLANNINGII. ANDFEES. NEW 40 Revised June l, 1993 vgw
CITY OF TEMECULA 'S FEE SCHEDULE
THE TENTATIVE MAP OR FINAL MAPS OR THE IMPROVEMENT PLANS AS A DIRECT
~T OF THE IMPOSITION-BY THE CITY OF ADDITIONAL OR DIFFERENT
CONDITIONS; HOWEVER, IF THE LAND DIVIDER MAKES ANY CHANGES OR
ALTERATIONS TO THE TENTATIVE OR FINAL MAPS OR TO THE IMPROVEMENT PLANS
WHICH ARE NOT THE DIRECT RESULT OF THE IMPOSITION OF ADDITIONAL OR
DIFFERENT CONDITIONS BY THE CITY, THE LAND DIVIDER SHALL BE REQUIRED TO
PAY ALL THE FILING FEES SPECIFIED IN SUBSECTIONS A THROUGH D OF THIS
SECTION.
AIR OUALITY ELEMENT FEE
42.
IN ADDITION TO THE FEES SET FORTH IN SUBSECTION A, B AND E. OF THIS SECTION,
THE APPLICANT FOR ANY RESIDENTIAL; TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP OR
RESIDENTIAL PARCEL MAP SHALL PAY A FEE OF $11 PER LOT AND THE APPLICANT
FOR ANY STATUTORY CONDOMINIUM SUBDIVISION MAP SHALL PAY A FEE OF $11 PER
UNIT OR THE PURPOSES OF PREPARING AND IMPLEMENTING AN AIR QUALITY
ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN.
A. AIR QUALITY ELEMENT FEE
1. Planning ....................................... $11/lot or unit
REFUND OF FEES OF ORDINANCE NO. 460
43.
44.
WHENEVER AN APPLICATION FOR A LAND DIVISION OR RELATED APPLICATION IS
TERMINATED FOR ANY REASON, THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT MAY, IN ACCORDANCE
WITH REFUND POLITY STATEMENT ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL, REFUND FEES
PAID, UPON THE WRITTEN REQUEST OF THE APPLICANT. IF ANY PORTION OF THE
APPLICATION FEES HAS BEEN PAID BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO ANOTHER
JURISDICTION, AGENCY, OR DEPARTMENT FOR THE PERFORMANCE OF SERVICES
RELATED TO THE APPLICATION, THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT WILL NOT REFUND
ANY SUCH POTION OF FEES UNTIL THE OTHER JURISDICTION, AGENCY, OR
DEPARTMENT AUTHORIZES THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO DO SO. IN THE
ABSENCE OF SUCH AUTHORIZATION, IT WILL BE THE APPLICANT'S RESPONSIBILITY
TO CONTACT THE OTHER JURISDICTION, AGENCY, OR DEPARTMENT OR A REFUND
OF THE FEES PAID TO IT, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REFUND POLICY STATEMENT.
THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT SHALL RETAIN A PROCESSING FEE OF $75 FROM THE
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE REFUNDED
................................... 75
R: IS~P~NGZANDFEES. NE~ 41 Revised lame 1, 1993
CITY OF TEMECULA 'S FEE SCHEDULE
SECTION 6
The fees for Ordinance No. 546, relating to fire protection regulations shall be paid to the Fire Chief and
deposited into the general fund, and shall be as follows:
PLAN CHECKS AND INSPECTIONS- FIRE
1. PLAN CHECKS - BUILIHNGS
Fire
..................................................... $558
SITE INSPECTIONS (WHERE REQUIRED)
Fire
...................................................... 138
3. DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE LETTERS (INCLUDING SELF-ADDRESSED, STAMPED
ENVELOPE)
A,
Fire
....................................................... 84
MAJOR INDUSTRIAL PROJECT, RESEARCH REPORTS
A. Fire (time & charges - deposit) ..................................... 560
FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS, PLAN CHECKS INSPECTIONS
,
A,
Fire
...................................................... 558
"HOOD DUCT" SYSTEM PLAN CHECK AND INSPECTIONS
,
A,
Fire
...................................................... 354
FOLLOW-UP INSPECTION FOR "NONCOMPLIANCE"
A,
Fire
...................................................... 138
FIRE SAFETY INSPECTIONS (LICENSED CARE)
1. First Inspection (New License)
A. 6 or less
B,
1. Fire
7 or more
Fire
................................................. 162
R"LSh°LANNINGtL4NDFEES'NEW 42 Revised June 1, 1993 vgw
CITY OF TEMECULA 'S FEE SCHEDULE
FEES
2. Inspection for Change in License
A. Fire
...................................................... $81
3. Annual Inspection (No Change in Occupancy)
A. Fire
....................................................... 40
4. Follow-up Inspection for "Noncompliance"
A. Fire
....................................................... 16
FIRE SAFETY INSURANCE (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL}
1. Retail Buildings/Locations
A. Up through 2,499 sq. ft.
1. Fire .................................... · .............. 58
B. 2,500 through 4,999 sq. ft.
1. Fire
.................................................. 82
C. 5,000 sq. ft. or more
1. Fire
................................................. 124
2. Manufacturing
A,
Fire
...................................................... 124
,
Commercial
A. Up through 4,999 sq. ft.
1. Fire
.................................................. 82
B. 5,000 sq. ft. or more
I. Fire
............................................ ..... 124
Restaurants
Up through 4,999 sq. ft.
1. Fire
.................................................. 82
R.'ISXPI-ANNINGtI.,ANDFEF_.$.NEW 43 Revised June I, 1993 vgw
,
CITY OF TEMECULA 'S FEE SCHEDULE
FEES
B. 5,000 sq. ft. or more
1. Fire
................................................ $124
Hotel/Motels/Apartments
A. Fire (per story) ........................................ 82 + $3/unit
Mobile Home RV Parks - Incidental Use Areas
A. Fire
........................................... 82 + $3/site over 20
Follow-up Inspection for "Noncompliance"
A. Fire
...................................................... 121
Miscellaneous
A. Tank Installation Use or Permit, and Inspections
1. Fire (one tank) plan check permit & inspection
includes propane tanks .......................... 208 + $32/add tank
Water System Flow Test
Fire (per hydrant) ............................................. 171/per hyd
Special Inspections (Access, Clearance, Housekeeping, etc.
A. Fire
...................................................... 121
R.'L$~PLANNINGIIANDFF, EXNEW 44 Revised June l, 1993 vgw
CITY OF TEMECULA 'S FEE SCHEDULE
FEES
SECTION 7
The fees for Ordinance No. 547, relating to the implementation of the Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zones Act,
shall be as follows:
FILING OF A GEOLOGIC REPORT FOR APPROVAL
A. Planning - par up to 10 ac
.............................. $451 + $16/add ac
B. Public Works
1. Comprehensive Transportation Plan ................ 36 + $2/add ac max 50
WAIVER OF GEOLOGIC REPORT
B,
Planning .............................................. 58 + $324
upon submission to State Geologist of recommendation of approval of waiver by the City
Engineer
Public Works
1. Comprehensive Transportation Plan
.......................... 5 + $26
upon submission to State Geologist of recommendation of the City Engineer
R.. iSIPLANNING~4ND FEES. NEW
45 Revised June 1, 1993 vgw
CITY OF TEMECULA 'S FEE SCHEDULE
FEE___ S
SECTION 8
The fees for Ordinance No. 555, relating to the implementation of the Surface Mining and Reclamation Act of
1975, shall be as follows:
1. SURFACE MINING PERMIT
,
Planning .................................................$3,723
Environmental Health
.......................................... 141
Public Works ...............................................1,339
1. Traffic Study, if required ................................... 780
2. Comprehensive Transportation Plan
Parks ............................. 298
..................................................... 355
RECLAMATION PLANS SUBMITrED FOR VESTED OPERATION CONDUCTED AFFER
JANUARY 1, 1976
,
A,
Planning ......
Public Works... ::ZS:SZ: .................................... 1,727
..................................... 410
1. Traffic Study, if required ................................... 780
2. Comprehensive Transportation Plan ............................. 138
APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION
Planning ................... 3~
Public Works (if road conditions are appealed) ~~ ....................
1. Comprehensive Transportation Plan
.............................. 25
SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMANCE
,
A,
Planning ................................................... 199
Public Works
1. Comprehensive Transportation Plan '
.............................. 16
REVISED PERMIT
Planning ................................................... 785
Public Works
1. Comprehensive Transportation Plan
.............................. 63
R.'ISIPLANNINGILANDFEF~NEW 46 Rtvisat June 1, 1993 vgw
CITY OF TEMECULA 'S FEE SCHEDULE
SECTION 9
The fees for Ordinance No. 559, relating to the removal of trees, shall be as follows:
1.
_FEES
APPLICATION FOR A PERMIT TO REMOVE ONE OR MORE NATIVE LIVING TREES
A. Planning .................................................. $214
B. Public Works
1. Comprehensive Transportation Plan
.............................. 17
R: IStPLANNINGtl. ANDFF_.F~. NEW
47 Revi~ed June 1, 199.3 vgw
CITY OF TEMECULA 'S FEE SCHEDULE
FEE___~S
SECTION 10
The fees for Ordinance No. $78, providing for the establishment of historic preservation districts shall be as
follows:
1. CERTIFICATE OF HISTORIC APPROPRIATENESS
,
PIning .................................................. $189
Parks .....................................................
Public Works 111
I. Comprehensive Transportation Plan
..............................
APPEALS
PIning ................................................... 106
Public Works
1. Comprehensive Transportation Plan
.............................. 8
R:ISIPLANNINGLLANDFEES. NEW 48 Revised June 1, 1993 vgw
CITY OF TEMECULA 'S FEE SCHEDULE
,
,
FEES
SECTION 10
The fees for Ordinance No. 650, regulating the discharge of sewage in the City of Temecula and providing
penalties for violations shall be as follows:
FOR EACH PARCEL NOT IN THE SAME LAND DIVISION, LARGER THAN 10,000 SQ. FT.
IN SIZE, NOT IN AN IDENTIFIES CRUCIAL AREA AND WHERE NO SITE EVALUATION IS
REQUIRED (SUBSURFACE DISPOSAL SYSTEM)
A. Environmental Health .......................................... $153
FOR MULTIPLE PARCELS WITHIN THE SAME LAND DIVISION (SUBSURFACE DISPOSAL
SYSTEMS)
A. For each of the first four (4) Parcels
Environmental Health
....................................... 55
For each parcel with the same land division after the first four (4) parcels within that land
division
Environmental Health
....................................... 55
SUBSURFACE SEWAGE DISPOSAL PLAN RE-REVIEW WHERE A SECOND REVIEW IS
NEEDED DUE TO MODIFICATIONS, ADDITIONS, OR DELETIONS TO A PREVIOUSLY
APPROVED DESIGN
A,
Environmental Health
............................................ 55
ALTERNATIVE AND EXPERIMENTAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEMS INCLUDING ON-SITE
EVALUATION PLAN REVIEW
Environmental Health
........................................... 656
SITE EVALUATION IN CONJUNCTION WITH ~EWAGE DISPOSAL PLAN REVIEW IN
CRITICAL SUB-SURFACE SEWAGE DISPOSAL AREAS AS DETERMINED BY THE HEALTH
OFFICER
A,
Environmental Health
........................................... 197
SITE EVALUATION AND SEWAGE DISPOSAL PLAN REVIEW FOR INDIVIDUAL LOTS LESS
THAN 10,000 SQ. FT. IN SIZE AND LOCATED OUTSIDE CRITICAL SUB-SURFACE SEWAGE
DISPOSAL AREAS
A,
Environmental Health
........................................... 172
R.' ISXPLANNINGIIANDFEE& NEW 49 Revi~ed June 1, 1993 vgw
CITY OF TEMECULA 'S FEE SCHEDULE
10.
FEES
SEWER VERIHCATION WHERE READILY RETRIEVABLE DATA IS NOT AVMLABLE (I.E.
SUBDIVISION OR PARCEL MAP HLES) INCLUDES FHA/VA APPROVAL FORMS FOR
SYSTEMS LESS THAN 1 YEAR
A,
Environmental Health
........................................... $58
SITE EVALUATION UPON REQUEST BY APPLICANT OR HIS AGENT, TO ESTABLISH
PRELIMINARY CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OR VERIFY SITE CONDITIONS
Environmental Health
........................................... 120
HOLDING TANK APPROVAL
A,
Environmental Health
....................................... ' .... 119
PRELIMINARY ELECTIVE EVALUATION OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL REQUIREMENTS PRIOR
TO APPLICATION TO PLANNING DEPARTMENT (INCLUDES EVALUATION OF METHOD
OF WATER SUPPLY)
A,
Environmental Health
............................................ 69
R:ISIPLANNINGIIANDFEES. NEW 50 Revised June l, 1993 vgw
CITY OF TEMECULA 'S FEE SCHEDULE
FEES
SECTION 12
The fees for Ordinance No. 653, establishing fees for examination of Records of Survey and corner Records by
the City of Temecula shall be as follows:
1. FILING A RECORD OF SURVEY
A. Public Works
1. Survey .............................................. $600
2. HLING A CORNER RECORD
A. Public Works
1. Survey ................................................ 7
R:IS~PLANNINGLLANDFF25. NEW 5l Revised June 1, 1993 vgw
CITY OF TEMECULA 'S FEE SCHEDULE
SECTION 13
FEES
Rules for the City of Temecula Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
The fees and EIR deposits for environmental review pursuant to the "Rules for the City
Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act" shall be as follows:
1. NO FEE SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR THE FOLLOWING PROJECTS:
A.
of Temecula
Projects which are categorically exempt from environmental review by the State Guidelines of
the Rules for the City of Temecula Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA), unless an Initial Study is conducted to determine if the project is exempt.
City project when the fee will be paid into the same fund into which it is deposited.
Requests to improve and accept a road into the City Maintained Road System.
Preparation of an Initial Study on an application to change the zoning designation on a parcel
when the application is required to be filed as a Condition of Approval on a previously approved
application.
The fees required for requests to conduct initial studies relating to the following applications shall be paid to the
Planning Department of the City Of Temecula as follows:
/,_-...
APPLICATIONS FOR GRADING PERMITS
,
A. Planning ..................................... $594 + $5/ac max 2,179
B. Public Works
1. Comprehensive Transportation Plan
.............................. 48
APPLICATIONS FOR COMMERCIAL WIND ENERGY CONSERVATION SYSTEM PERMITS
(Commercial Wind Energy Conversion System Permits)
A. Planning ........................... 420 + $5/ga max of $1997 + $278/gnw
B. Public Works
1. Comprehensive Transportation Plan ...................... 34 + $22/gnw ·
APPLICATIONS FOR TREE REMOVAL
,
A. Planning ................................................... 207
B. Public Works
1. Comprehensive Transportation Plan
.............................. 17
ALL OTHER APPLICATION (Initial Study Negative Declaration)
A. Planning ...................................... 568 + $5/ga 2,061 max
B. Public Works
1. Comprehensive Transportation Plan
.............................. 45
R:tSXPLANNINGtl.,4NDFEF_.S. NEW
32 Revised June 1, 1993 vgw
CITY OF TEMECULA 'S FEE SCHEDULE
FEES
Whenever two or more applications are filed concurrently by the same applicant for the same property, only one
fee for the preparation of the Initial Study shall be required.
The deposits required for the preparation of the draft EIR shall be paid to the Planning Department of the City
Of Temecula as follows:
IF THE PROJECT SPONSOR PREPARED THE DRAFT EIR
A. Planning ............. $6 202
C. Parks .......................
D. Public Works ............................. 422
1. Comprehensive Transportation Plan ............................. 496
2. Traffic Study, if required ................................... 780
IF PURSUANT TO SECTION 706 OF THE RULES FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA
IMPLEMENTING THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, A PREVIOUSLY
PREPARED EIR IS UTILIZED AS THE DRAFt EIR
,
A. Planning ................................................. 1,021
B. Environmental Health ........................................... 378
C. Parks ..................................................... 422
D. Public Works
1. Comprehensive Transportation Plan
FAULT HAZARD REPORT REVIEW (CEQA)
Planning for the first 10 acres
Public Works ..................... 516 + $18/add ac - max 734
1. Comprehensive Transportation Plan
for the first 10 acres
........................ 41 + $2/add ac - max 58
GEOLOGIC WAIVER
Planning ·
........................... 121 + $366 when submitted to the State
Public Works
1. Comprehensive Transportation Plan ....... 10 + $:29 when submiRed to the State
LIQUEFACTION REPORT
A,
Planning ................................................... 349
Public Works
1. Comprehensive Transportation Plan
.............................. 28
APPEAL TO PLANNING COMMISSION
A,
Planning .................................................... 93
Public Works
1. Comprehensive Transportation Plan
.............................. 7
R: ~IPLANNINGII..ANDFEE.$. NEW
Re~ed June 1, 1~;~3 vgw
CITY OF TEMECULA 'S FEE SCHEDULE
APPEAL TO CITY COUNCIL
Planning .................................................. $115
Public Works
1. Comprehensive Transportation Plan
.............................. 9
R:ISXPLANN1NGLLANDFEES. NEW 54 Redsrid June 1, 1~9.~ vgw
CITY OF TEMECULA 'S FEE SCHEDULE
FEES
SECTION 14
Rules and Regulations Governing Agricultural Preserves in the City of Temecula Fees
The fees for Agricultural Preserve Applications pursuant to the Rules and Regulations Governing Agricultural
Preserves in the City of Temecula shall be as follows:
,
,
1. ESTABLISHMENT OR ENLARGEMENT OF AN AGRICULTURE PRESERVE (Applicant
Initiated)
A,
ESTABLISHMENT OR
COUNCIL INITIATED)
Planning ............................. $1,371 + $103/owner's application +
$103 contract upon approval - non refund
Public Works
1. Comprehensive Transportation Plan ............... 110 + $8/owner's per +
$S/contract upon approval - non refund
ENLARGEMENT OF AN AGRICULTURAL PRESERVE (CITY
A. Planning
B. Public W{;rid ..................................... 103 + $1 03/contract
1 Comprehensive Transportation Plan
· · ..................... 8 + $8/contact
EXECUTION OF A LAND CONSERVATION CONTRACT FOR LAND WITHIN AND
ESTABLISHED AGRICULTURAL PRESERVE (City Council Initiated)
A. Planning (per contract)
B. Public Works .......................................... 103
1. Comprehensive Transportation Plan
.............................. 8
DISESTABLISHED OR ENLARGEMENT OF AN AGRICULTURAL PRESERVE (APPLICATION
INITIATED)
A. Planning (non-refundable)
B. Public Works .............. ' ......................... 1,245
1. Comprehensive Transportation Plan
............................. 100
DISESTABLISHED OR DIMINISHMENT OF AN AGRICULTURAL PRESERVE (CITY
COUNCIL INITIATED)
No Fee
NOTICE OF NON-RENEWAL
Planning .................................................... 53
Public Works
1. Comprehensive Transportation Plan
.............................. 4
R:ISIPI. ANNINGILANDFEES. NEW 55 Revised June 1, l~J vgw
CITY OF TEMECULA 'S FEE SCHEDULE
FEES
SECTION 15
The fees fixing procedures to vacate and accept City highways and property offered for dedication, shall be paid
to the Director of Public Works of the City of Temecula and shall be as follows:
VACATION OF PUBLIC STREETS, HIGHWAYS CODE SECTION 8300, ET. SEQ.
A. General Vacations
1. Public Works
Summary Vacations
......................................... $4,155
1. Public Works
STREET NAMES
........................................... 920
A. Change requiring Public Hearings
B,
Public Works
................................... 210 + 65/name
Over-the-Counter Approval
Public Works
........................................ 65/name
R:~SIPI-.4NNINGXI..ANDFEEXNEW 56 Rev'ited June 1, 1993 vgw
,
CITY OF TEMECULA 'S FEE SCHEDULE
SECTION 16
ARCHIVAL SEARCH FEE FOR PLANNING INFORMATION
A. Planning .................................................
$27 per hour of staff time expended, computed at $6.75 per each
xA hour or fraction thereof for information or documents which are
not readily available and accessible.
RESEARCH FEE FOR PLANNING INFORMATION
A.
FEES
$27/hr
Planning .................................................. 45/hr
$45 per hour of staff time expended, computed at $11.25 per each
~ hour or fraction thereof for information or documents which are
not readily available and accessible.
RESEARCH FEE FOR HISTORIC VERIFICATION
A. Planning .................................................. 48/hr
R.' kS l P IMNNI N G ~iND FEES. NEW
57 Revised June l, 1993 vgw
CITY OF TEMECULA 'S FEE SCHEDULE
FEES
SECTION 17
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
A,
Planning ................................................. $4,000
Public Works ................................................ 550
ANNEXATION FEES
Planning ................................................ 710
Public Works ' '
.............................................. ;. 240
**Applicant is required to pay LAFCO Fees
PROJECTS CONTINUI~ AT PUBLIC HEARING
Planning ...............................2,000 deposit + time and material
Public Works
............................ 1,000 deposit + time and material
PUBLIC HEARING FEES
A. Planning Department ........................................... 150
R.'ISXPLANNINGLLANDFEES. NEW 58 Revised June 1, 1993 vgw
CITY OF TEMECULA 'S FEE SCHEDULE
SECTION 18
LANDSCAPING PLANS
A. Onsite and offsite, 4% of final construction up to three submittals
............................................. cost estimate
B. Fourth and subsequent submittal
$100/sheet
R.' I S I PLANNI N G tI, AND FEES. NEW
Revised June 1, 1993 vgw
City of Temecula
Planning Department
LIST OF FEE CHANGES
Tenant Improvement
Change of Use
Single Family Residence
Signs (except sign programs)
Additions to Single Family
Home Occupations
Change of Copy
Old Town Architectural Review
Minor Outdoor Event (For Profit)
Minor Outdoor Event
(Not For Profit)
Major Outdoor Event
(Not For Profit)
Conditional Use Permit
(Existing Building)*
Public Use Permit
(Existing Building)*
Second Unit Permit
Lot Line Adjustment
DRC Landscape Plan Review
Construction Document Review
Landscape Plan Review
Landscape Plan Check**
Landscape Inspection
Construction Inspection
None $ 30.00
None $ 30.00
None $ 30.00
$ 190.00 $ 30.00
None $ 30.00
None $ 20.00
None $ 20.00
None $ 20.00,
$ 190.00 $190.00
$ 190.00 $107.00
$ 190.00 $ 157.00
$5,863.00 $ 945.00
$6,246.00
$2,886.00
$1,160.00
None
None
Portion of Application
Fee
Portion of $190
consistency Check Fee
None
None
$ 945.00
$ 945.00
$ 960.00
$ 200.00
$ 270.00
per sheet
$ 200.00
$ 270.00
per sheet
$ 225
per inspection
$ 225.00
per inspection
R.'|~$LPL, INNING~.ANDFE. F~.NEW 60 Revised June 1, 1993 vgw
Commercial/Industrial ~ $7,115 $1,849.00
* Pursuant to Council direction, while the current fees show as $5863.00 and $6246.00, the City has been
collecting the fee of $945.00 for those uses that require conditional or public use approval that are going into
an existing building.
Landscape irrigation plans and detail sheets only. Unused portion of fee will be refunded for large submittals
with repetitive plans.
R.'XS~PLANNING~NDFEEXNEW 61 Revixed June 1, 1993 vgw
City of Temecula
Community Services Department
LIST OF FEE CHANGES
Specific Han Land Use
Substantial Conformance for
Specific Hans
Tentative Subdivision Map in R-4
Revised Tentative Map
$355.00
Not established for
TCSD
Not established for
TCSD
Not established for
TCSD
Proposed Fee
$2,000.00
$75.00
$355.00
$355.00
R.'IS~PLANNINGIL4NDFEF_.S. NEW 62 Revised June 1, 1993 vgw
Application
FEMA - CLOMR
FEMA - LOMR
Transportation Demand
Management Study
0 - 500 cy
501 - 10,000 cy
10,000 - 100,000 cy
Over 100,000 cy
Grading Permit
0 - 50 cy
51 - 100 cy
101 - 1,000 cy
1,001 - 10,000 cy
10,001 - 100,000 cy
Over 100,000 cy
Monthly Blanket Utility
Permit 1
Permit 2
Minor/Major Construction Project
Main Line
City of Temecula
Public Works Department
LIST OF FEE CHANGES
Current Fee [ Proposed Fee
5,000 5,000
5,000 1,000 (1)
None 250 (2)
N/A 350 (3)
N/A 500 (3)
N/A 1,000 (3)
N/A 1300+50/10,000 cy (3)
Over 100,000 (3)
15 Eliminate
22.50 Eliminate
22.50 + Eliminate
10.50/add 100 cy
117 + Eliminate
9/add 1,000 cy
198 + Eliminate
40.50/add 10,000 cy
562 + Eliminate
22.50/add 10,000 cy
N/A
N/A
None
25 + l/If of Excavation
25/month + 10/cut
100/year + 20/cut
$100/sheet or as
determined by the City
Engineer (rain $100)
25 + 1/lf of Excavation
or as determined by the
City Engineer (5)
R:tSIPLANNINGILANDFF_.ES. NEW 63 Revised J~ne 1, 1993 vgw
ITEM NO. 12
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER /~1~_
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning
June 8, 1993
PA93-0038, a request to convert an existing young adult nightclub into an
adult only nightclub which will allow the selling and on-site consumption of
alcohol.
Prepared By:
Craig D. Ruiz, Assistant Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
It is requested that the City Council:
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
DENYING PA93-0038, MINOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, AFFIRMING
THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION TO DENY SAID
APPLICATION TO ALLOW THE CONVERSION OF AN EXISTING YOUNG
ADULT NIGHTCLUB INTO AN ADULT ONLY NIGHTCLUB WHICH WILL
ALLOW THE SELLING AND ON-SITE CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOL
LOCATED AT 28822 FRONT STREET.
BACKGROUND
In June of 1991, Administrative Plot Plan No. 153 was approved for the Valley Beat teen
nightclub. In April of 1992, the applicant subsequently received City Council approval for
Conditional Use Permit No. 19 for this same use.
On February 23, 1993, the applicant filed a Minor Conditional Use Permit (CUP) application
in accordance with Ordinance No. 93-07 (Adult Business Ordinance) for the conversion of an
existing young adult nightclub to an adult nightclub. Ordinance No. 93-07 requires a CUP for
the establishment of bars and cocktail lounges. The CUP was filed as a Director approval;
however, because of concerns relating to compatibility of the proposed use, the matter was
referred by the Planning Director to the Planning Commission for consideration.
On April 5, 1993, the City of Temecula Planning Commission voted 5-0 to deny PA93-0038,
Minor Conditional Use Permit.
R:\S\STAFFRPTBSPA93.CC 5127/93 kJb 1
DISCUSSION
The primary issue of concern raised by the Planning Commission during the public hearing for
this project was the proximity between the proposed nightclub and the Temecula Teen Center
and the Skate City skating rink. The location of the proposed use would be approximately
400 feet from both the teen center and the skating rink. The Temecula Teen Center and
Skate City skating rink are uses that cater primarily to minors.
The Planning Commission found that the proposed nightclub in this location would result in
an incompatibility of land uses. This finding was based on the fact that the teen center and
the skating rink would operate during essentially the same hours as the proposed nightclub.
The Planning Commission also found that the sale and on-site consumption of alcohol this
close to the teen center and the skating rink would pose a threat to the general health, safety
and welfare of the community. Based upon these two findings the Commission denied the
applicant's request.
Also discussed during the public hearing was a concern raised by three citizens that there was
a history of excessive noise coming from the teen club's sound system. The citizens
explained that music would travel across Interstate 15 and could be heard at their residences
in the Rancho Highlands development.
FISCAL IMPACT
None.
Attachments
2.
3.
4.
5.
Resolution No. 93- - Page 3
Planning Commission Denial Resolution (April 5, 1993) - Page 7
Planning Commission Minutes, April 5, 1993 - Page 8
Planning Commission Staff Report, April 5, 1993 - Page 9
Applicant Letter of Rebuttal and Exhibit - Page 10
R:\S\STAFFRPT~gPA93.CC 5/27/93 klb ~)
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
R:~S\STAFFRPT~3sPA93.CC 5/27193 klb 3
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF ~ CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY
OF TEMECULA DENYING PA93-0038, MINOR
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, AFFIRMING ~
PLANNING COMMI~SION'S DECISION TO DENY SAm
APPLICATION TO ALLOW ~ CONVERSION OF AN
EXISTING YOUNG ADULT NIGHTCLUB INTO AN ADULT
ONLY NIGHTCLUB WHICH WILL ALLOW ~ SELLING
AND ON-SITE CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOL LOCATEB
AT 28822 FRONT STREET.
WF~-REAS, in accordance with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and
Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference, Mr. Stosan Mitich fried
PA93-0038, Minor Conditional Use Permit, proposing to allow the conversion of an existing
young adult nightclub into an adult only nightclub which will allow the selling and on-site
consumption of alcohol located at 28822 Front Street.
WHF.~, the proposed project is located in close proximity to the Temecula Teen
Center and the Skate City Skating Rink, two uses that cater primarily to minors;
WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly incorporated City
shall adopt a General Plan within thirty (30) months following incorporation. During that 30-
month period of time, the City is not subject to the requirement that a General Plan be adopted
and that its decision be consistent with the General Plan if certain findings are made;
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 18.28 of Riverside County Ordinance No. 348, a
conditional use permit must be denied unless the applicant demonstrates that the proposed use
will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the community;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing pertaining to said
Conditional Use Permit on April 5, 1993, at which iime interested persons had opportunity to
testify with either in support or opposition to said Conditional Use Permit and;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after having considered
all information presented, the Planning Commission denied said Conditional Use Permit;
WHEREAS, Mr. Stosan Mitich fried an appeal of the Planning Commission decision;
WHEREAS, said Appeal application was processed in the time and manner prescribed
by State and local law;
and;
WHEREAS, the City Council received a copy of the Staff Report regarding the Appeal;
R:\S\STAFFRFr~38pA93.CC 5/27/93/fro
WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a public hearing pertaining to said Appeal on
June 8, 1993, at which time interested persons had opportunity to testify either in support or
opposition to said Appeal;
NOW, TI~-REFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THF, CITY OF TEM~ECULA
DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Findings. The Temecula City Councfi hereby denies PA93-0038,
Minor Conditional Use Permit based upon the following findings:
A. The appellant has failed to demonstrate the proposed project will not be
detrimental to the health, safety and general weftare of the community.
B. The proposed project is not consistent with Ordinance No. 348 since the use does
not meet all the requirements of Section 18.28 of Ordinance No. 348 which requires that a
proposed use not pose a threat to public health, safety and general weftare of the community.
C. The project, as proposed, will adversely affect the public health and welfare on
the grounds the use will allow the selling and on-site consumption of alcohol in close proximity
to the Temecula Teen Center and the Skate City skating rink.
D. The project, as proposed, would result in an incompatible land use on the
grounds the use will allow the selling and on-site consumption of alcohol in close proximity to
the Temecula Teen Center and the Skate City skating rink.
Section 2. Environmental Compliance. The proposed project is not subject to
the California Environmental Quality Act per Section 15061(b)(3).
R:\S\STAFFRPT~38PA9:t.CC 5/27/93 klb 5
Section 3. PASSED, APPROV~-D AND ADOPTED this 8th day of June, 1993.
ATTEST:
SAL Mtn oz
MAYOR
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFO~)
COUNTY OF RIVERSm~ SS
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, I4g~y DO CERTIFY that the
foregoing Ordinance No.93- was duly introduce~! and placed upon its first reading at a
regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 13th day of April, 1993, and
that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City
Council of the City of Temecula on the 13th day of April, 1993, by the following roll call vote:
CO~CILMEMBERS:
NOES:
CO~Cn-n,m'tvlBEl~:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
JUNE S.
CITY CLERK
R:\SXSTAFFRPTX38PA93.CC 5127193 lab 6
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
PLANNING COMMISSION DENIAL RESOLUTION
APRIL 5, 1993
R:~S\STAFFRPT~$PA93.CC ,5127193 klb 7
ATrACHMI~NT NO. 1
PC RESOLUTION NO. 93-08
A RESOLUTION OF ~ PLANNING COMMIRSION OF
~ CITY OF TEMECUIA DENYING PA,q3-0038, MINOR
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO CONYERT AN EXISTING
TEEN NIGHTCLUB INTO AN ADULT ONLY NIGHTCLUB
AND TH'E SELLING AND ON-SITE CONSU54YFION OF
ALCOHOL LOCATED AT 28812 FRONT STREET, SUITE
203, PARCEL NUMBER 922-093-002.
WI~REAS, Charles Mitlch ~ed PA93-0038, Minor Conditional Use Permit in
accordance with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision Ordinances,
which the City has adopted by reference;
W1TEREAS, said Minor Conditional Use Permit application was processed in the time
and manner prescribed by State and local law;
WITEREAS, the Planning Commission considered said Conditional Use Permit on April
5, 1993 at which time interested persons had an opportunity to .testify either in support or
opposition;
VvqtEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, the Commission
recommended denial of said Conditional Use Permit;
NOW, TI:IF. REFORE, ~ PLANNING COMMISSION OF TFrE CITY OF
TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Findings. That the Temecula Planning Commission hereby makes the
following findings:
A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly incorporated city shall
adopt a general plan within thirty (30) months folio-wing incorporation. During that 30-month
period of time, the city is not subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or the
requirements of state law that its decisions be consistent with the general plan, if all of the
following requirements are met:
B. The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of the general plan.
C. The Riverside County General Plan, as amended by the Southwest Area
Community Plan, (hereinafter "SWAP") was adopted prior to the incorporation of Temecula as
the General Plan for the southwest portion of Riverside County, including the area now within
the boundaries of the City. At this time, the City has adopted SWAP as its General Plan
guidelines while the City is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of its General
Plan.
R:XS\STAFFRPT~38PA93.pC 4/6/93 tj, 6
D. Pursuant to Section 18.28(e), no Conditional Use Penit may be'a~_unless
the applicant demonstrates the proposed use will not be detrimental to the health, sifety and
welfare of the community, and further, that any Conditional Use Permit approved shall be
subject to such conditions as shall be necessary to protect the health, safety and general welfare
of the community.
E. The Planning Commission, in denying the proposed Conditional Use Permit,
makes the following f'mdings, to wit:
1. There is a reasonable probability that PA93-0038i, Minor Conditional Use
Permit will be consistent with the City's future General Plan, Land Use Component which will
be completed in a reasonable time and in accordance with State law due to the fact that the
project is consistent with existing zoning of General Commercial and the Draft General Plan
Land Use designation of Service Commercial. (Amended by Planning Commission on April
5, 1993.)
2. The proposed project is not consistent with Ordinance No. 348 since the
use does not meet all the requirements of Section 18.28 of Ordinance No. 348 which requires
that a proposed use not pose a threat to public health, safety and general welfare of the
community.
3. The project, as proposed, will adversely affect the public health and
welfare on the grounds the use will allow the selling and on-site consumption of alcohol in close
proximity to the Temecula Teen Center and the Skate City skating rink.
4. The project, as proposed, would result in incompatible land uses on the
grounds the use will allow the selling and on-site consumption of alcohol in close proximity to
the Temecula Teen Center and the Skate City skating rink.
5. The proposed project is not subject to the California Environmental Quality
Act per Section 15061Co)(3).
Section 2. Environmental Compliance. The proposed project is not subject to the
California Environmental Quality Act per Section 1-5061(b)(3).
Section 3. Conditions. The City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby denies
PA93-0038, Minor Conditional Use Permit to convert the existing teen nightclub to an adult only
nightclub and allow the selling and on-site consumption of alcohol located at 28822 Front Street,
Suite 203, APN 922-093-002. The project has been recommended for denial; therefore, no
conditions have been prepared.
R:\S\STAFFRPT~38PA93.pC 4/6/93 tjs 7
Section 4. PASSED, APPROVE. r~ AND ADOFrED this 5th day of April, 1993.
I..INDA L. FAKEY
I WE. RERy CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 5th day of April,
1993 by the following vote of the Commission:
AYES: 5
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 0
PLANNING COMMISSIOn: BLAIR, CHINIAEFF, FAHEY,
FORD, HOAGLA. ND
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIOn:
/ GA.~Y THORNHILL
SECRETARY
R:\S\STAFFRPT~38PA93.pC 4/6/93 tim
8
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
APRIL 5, 1993
R:\S\STAFFRPT~SPA93.CC 5/27/93 klb 8
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
DRAFT
APRIL 5.1993
retail uses.
Bruce Wade, applicant, High Society Family Billiards, advised the Commission that he
owns several billiards locations and has not received a citation for selling alcohol to a
minor. Mr. Wade also advised that he does not sell alcohol unless you are playing a
game of pool.
It was moved by Commissioner Hoagland, seconded by Commissioner Chiniaeff to
close the public hearing at 7:30 P.M. and recommend Adoption of Resolution No. 93-
· approving PA 93-0025, Minor Conditional Use Permit based on the Analysis and
Findings contained in the staff report and subject to the Conditions of Approval.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 5
COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Chiniaeff, Ford, Hoagland, Fahey
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
Commissioner Chiniaeff restated that if parking becomes a problem for the center,
parking may be restricted or must be provided, and could possibly impact future
proposed leases for the complex.
8. PA 93-0038, Minor Conditional Use Permit
Proposal to convert an existing teen night club to an adult night club located at 28822
Front Street, Suite 203, Temecula.
Planner Craig Ruiz presented the staff report.
Chairman Fahey questioned why the General Plan Consistency states that the site will
likely be consistent with the City's future adopted. General Plan, when the proposed
use poses a threat to public health, safety and general welfare.
Debbie Ubnoske suggested that a ~)licy be a~lded requiring that the site be consistent
with the General Plan's futu~ U_~'~~
Chairman Fahey opened the public hearing at 7:30 P.M.
Chuck Bell, representing Industrial Developers, I 13 East Bay Avenue, Newport Beach,
stated that the land use is contradictory in Items 1 and 4 and the applicant is
proposing the legal use under the zoning of the site. He stated that staff did not
include what would be detrimental to public health, safety and welfare, in drinking of
alcohol in moderation. Mr. Bell stated that he feels there is less use at the Teen
Center, than there was at the Teen Nightclub. He added that he feels the project is
a significant distance from the Skating Rink and the Teen Center. Mr. Bell corrected
PCMIN4/05/93
/--- -6- 419/93
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
DRAFT
APRIL 5, 1993
that staff report description of the property by amending the 10,140 square feet to
4,800 square feet. Mr. Bell stated that the applicant had received no opposition from
existing tenants.
Sto~Vlitich, 28822 Front Street, Temecula, expressed that he feels the skating rink
and the teen club are rarely used and the proposed club will not interfere with either
of these projects.
Leroy LeBlanc, 44041 Quiet Meadow Road, Temecula, spoke in opposition to the
proposed project. Mr. LeBlanc stated that he experienced excessive noise and foot
traffic during the operation of the teen nightclub.
Don Alberts, 44089 Northgate Court, Temecula, spoke in opposition to the proposed
project. Mr. Alberts advised 'that he also was negatively impacted by the teen
nightclub. Mr. Alberts pointed out that he feels there was a relation to the opening of
the teen nightclub and the increase in graffiti in his housing development.
Stoh~Mitich stated that during the operation of the teen nightclub, if there were
complaints from neighbors, the club operators would work with the neighbors to
rectify the problem.
Commissioner Chiniaeff stated that the staff reports indicates findings have been made
which show that the project is not a compatible use, with the youth activities currently
in the same area as the proposed project.
Commissioner Blair concurred with Commissioner Chiniaeff.
It was moved by Commissioner Chiniaeff, seconded by Commissioner Ford to close the
public hearing at 7:55 P.M. and Adopt Resolution No. 93- denying PA93-0038,
Minor Conditional Use Permit, based on the analysis and findings contained in the staff
report.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 5
NOES: 0
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
Blair, Chiniaeff, Ford, Hoagland, Fahey
None
Chairman Fahey declared a recess at 7:55 P.M. The meeting reconvened at 8:05 P.M.
Develooment Aareement No. 92-1 (DA 92-1 ), Chanae of Zone No. 21 and Tentative
Parcel MaD No. 27314
A request to subdivide a 96.7 acre parcel into 4 parcels and a 48.4 acre remainder
parcel, a Development Agreement to ensure the development of the project as senior
PCMIN4/05/93 -7- 4/9/93 '~
ATTACHMENT NO. 4
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
APRIL 5, 1993
R:\S~STAFFRFI'~SpA93.CC $/27/93 klb 9
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
April 5, 1993
Case No.: PA93-0038, Minor Conditional Use Permit
Prepared By: Craig D, Ruiz, Assistant Planner
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Department Staff recommends that the Planning
Commission:
ADOPT Resolution No. 93-_. denying PA93-0038, Minor
Conditional Use Permit based on the Analysis and Findings
contained in the Staff Report.
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT:
PROPOSAL:
LOCATION:
EXISTING ZONING:
SURROUNDING
ZONING:
PROPOSED LAND USE
DESIGNATION:
EXISTING LAND USE:
SURROUNDING
LAND USES:
Charles Mitich, Dimensions Nightclub
A request to convert an existing young adult nightclub into a
adults only nightclub which will allow the selling and on-site
consumption of alcohol.
28822 Front Street, Suite 203
C-P (General Commercial)
North:
South:
East:
West:
C-P (General Commercial)
C-P (General Commercial)
Interstate 15 (I-15)
C-1/C-P (General Commercial)
Service Commercial
General Commercial
North:
South:
East:
West:
Retail/Commercial
Retail/Commercial
Interstate 15 (I-15)
Vacant
R:\S\STAFFRPT\38PA93.pC 3131/93 t~
BACKGROUND
On February 23, 1993, the applicant filed a Minor Conditional Use Permit (CUP) application
in accordance with Ordinance No. 93-07 for the conversion of an existing young adult
nightclub to an adult nightclub. Ordinance No. 93'07 requires a CUP for the establishment
of bars and cocktail lounges.
Originally, the young adult nightclub was approved through Administrative Plot Plan No. 153
in June of 1991. The applicant also received City Council approval for Conditional Use Permit
No. 19 in April of 1992 for this same use. This additional approval was required as a result
of a shooting incident that had occurred in March of 1992. This modification was filed as a
Director approval; however because of concerns relating to compatibility of the proposed use,
the matter was referred to the Planning Commission for consideration.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposed use is located at 28822 Front Street, Suite 203. The use occupies an
approximately 10,140 square foot, two story suite. Presently, the site is used for the
Dimensions young adult nightclub. The Minor Conditional Use Permit is a request to convert
the existing nightclub into an adults. only nightclub and to allow the selling and on-site
consumption of alcohol. '
ANALYSIS
A Conditional Use Permit should not be granted unless the applicant demonstrates that the
proposed use will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the
community. The location of the proposed use would be approximately 400 feet from both
the Temecula Teen Center and Skate City skating rink. The Temecula Teen Center and Skate
City skating rink are uses that cater primarily to minors.
It should be noted that the Teen Center will relocate to the Community Resource Center upon
completion of construction. However, the relocation is not anticipated to occur before
January of 1994.
While the location of this use is 28822 Front Street, the site is orientated to the I-15 freeway
and is not visible to Front Street. The orientation of the building makes this use difficult to
patrol and monitor by the Temecula Police Departr~ent.
While this use is permitted in the General Commercial zone, in staff's opinion, the use in this
particular location is not compatible with the surrounding uses. The Temecula Teen Center
and Skate City will generally be open during the same hours as the proposed nightclub. The
sale and on-site consumption of alcohol in close proximity to the Temecula Teen Center and
Skate City skating rink would result in an incompatibility of land uses.
The Alcohol Beverage Control Board (ABC) considers the Teen Center to be a sensitive use.
Sensitive uses within 600 feet of a liquor license request are notified of such a request. If
objections are raised, the appeal must go before a hearing body of the ABC.
R:\S\STAFFRPT\38PA93.pC 3131193 tie 2
ZONING AND FUTURE GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCy
The project site is zoned C-P (General Commercial) and the adjacent parcels are also zoned
General Commercial. While the proposed project is consistent with the requirements of the
C-P Zone, the use is not consistent with Section 18.28 of Ordinance 348 which requires that
a proposed use not pose a threat to public health, safety and general welfare of the
community.
The proposed Draft General Plan Land Use Designation is Service Commercial. It is
anticipated that the site will likely be consistent with the City's future adopted General Plan.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
Staff has determined the project is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act per
Section 15061 (b)(3).
SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS
While the project is consistent with Section 9.1 of Ordinance No. 348 (the General
Commercial Zone) the proposed use does not meet the requirement of Section 18.28 of
Ordinance 348 for Conditional Use Permits. Section 18.28 requires that proposed uses not
pose a threat to public health, safety and general welfare of the community. Due to the
proximity of the proposed nightclub to the Temecula Teen Center and the Skate City skating
rink, the proposed use has the potential to pose a threat to the health, safety or general
welfare of the community.
FINDINGS
e
e
There is a reasonable probability that PA93-0038, Minor Conditional Use Permit will
be consistent with the City's future General Plan, which will be completed in a
reasonable time and in accordance with State law due to the fact that the project is
consistent with existing zoning of General Commercial and the Draft General Plan
Land Use designation of Service Commercial.
The proposed project is not consistent with Ordinance No. 348 since the use does not
meet all the requirements of Section 18.28 of Ordinance No. 348 which requires that
a proposed use not pose a threat to public t~ealth, safety and general welfare of the
community.
The project, as proposed, will adversely affect the public health and welfare on the
grounds the use will allow the selling and on-site consumption of alcohol in close
proximity to the Temecula Teen Center and the Skate City skating rink.
The project, as proposed, would result in incompatible land uses on the grounds the
use will allow the selling and on-site consumption of alcohol in close proximity to the
Temecula Teen Center and the Skate City skating rink.
The proposed project is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act per
Section 15061 (b)(3).
R:\S\STAFFRPT~38PA93.pC 3/31/93 tie 3
Attachments: 1.
2.
Resolution - Blue Page 5
Exhibits - Blue Page 9
A. Vicinity Map
B. Site Plan
R:\S~STAFFRPT%38PA93.pC 3/31193 tie 4
ATTACHMENT NO. 5
APPLICANT'$ LETTER AND EXHIBIT
R:\S\STAFFP, FZ~SPA93.CC 5/27/93 klb '~ 0
April.6, 1993
A PR 0 6 1993
!', .....i ~,,;..: .
Exhibi=s 1 & 2
Use of Teen Center will be leaving shortly. The Teen Center closes at 10:00 p.m.,
far sooner than proposed club would close. Them is a wall between Teen Center
and the subject property.
Security guards would eliminate pot. ential loitering problems.
There ere two buildings that physically separate the nightclub and skating rink.
Skating rink would close far sooner than the proposed club. There is also a 3 ft.
grade separation between the two properties.
About 20-25 jobs can be created locally,
We have taken measures to eliminate sound problems across the freeway by
building a wall. Since then, we have received no complaints. This happened
approximately one month after the club opened.
Any potential problems can be resolved through the C.U.P. process.
ITEM NO. 13
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning;'7''
June 8, 1993
Five Year Approval Period for Plot Plans, Public Use Permits, and Conditional
Use Permits
RECOMMENDATION:
Direct staff to prepare an Ordinance allowing for two
additional one-year extensions of time for plot plans,
public use permits, and conditional use permits
BACKGROUND
On January 12, 1993, the County of Riverside Board of Supervisors adopted an Ordinance
which allows for three (3) one-year extensions of time for plot plans, public use permits, and
conditional use permits. Previously, the County's Ordinance allowed for one (1) one-year
extension of time for these applications. On March 16, 1993, the City of Murrieta adopted
a similar Ordinance.
The City of Temecula's staff, in recognition of existing economic conditions, and in an effort
to establish a consistent process between both the cities of Murrieta and Temecula, and the
County of Riverside, initiated an amendment to Ordinance 348, Sections 18.28, 18.29 and
18.30 through the adoption of an Ordinance to allow for two (2) additional one-year
extensions of time.
The above recommendation was presented to the, City' Coordinating Committee and the
Committee felt the additional extensions would be most helpful to the business community.
It was also the consensus of the Coordinating Committee that the City of Temecula achieve
a level of consistency with respect to length of approval with both the City of Murrieta and
the County of Riverside.
This matter was heard at the April 5, 1993 Planning Commission Hearing. The Commission
was concerned that by allowing additional extensions of time there might be County cases
still in the system that might be extended. Staff assured the Commission that this was not
the case and the Commission voted 4-1, with Commissioner Hoagland opposed, to initiate an
Ordinance allowing for two additional years for projects to be constructed. Commissioner
Hoagland's concern was that the additional two years provided applicants too much time to
construct their projects. It was the Commission's opinion, with Commissioner Hoagland in
opposition, that the five year approval process would benefit businesses by providing them
additional time in which to obtain funding and begin construction.
R:\S\STAFFRPT\CCEOT.IViEM SI14193 tlb 1
FISCAL IMPACT
While no formal fiscal impact study has been prepared, it is staff's opinion that a positive
fiscal impact will be generated by allowing potential businesses an additional two years in
which to obtain funding. In this economy, this additional time may provide businesses a
greater opportunity to construct in the City and begin generating revenue for the City.
R:\S~STAFFRPT~CCEOT.MEJVl 5/14/93 klb 2 ~'~',
ITEM NO.
14
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER /Tj,
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning
June 8, 1993
Development Agreement No. 92-1, Change of Zone No. 21, Tentative Parcel
Map No. 27314, Amendment No. 3 - Linfield
RECOMMENDATION:
It is requested that the City Council:
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA DENYING DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 92-1,
CHANGE OF ZONE N0.21, AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO.
27314, AMENDMENT NO, 3 TO ENSURE THE DEVELOPMENT
OF THE PROJECT AS SENIOR HOUSING, CONGREGATE CARE
FACILITY, SKILLED NURSING, PERSONAL CARE, A NINE HOLE
PRIVATE GOLF COURSE AND DEDICATION OF A 2.3 NET ACRE
PARCEL TO THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR A SENIOR CITIZEN
CENTER, A ZONE CHANGE FROM R-R (RURAL RESIDENTIAL)
TO R-3 (GENERAL RESIDENTIAL) AND TO SUBDIVIDE A 96.7
ACRE PARCEL INTO 4 PARCELS AND A 48.4 ACRE REMAINDER
PARCEL LOCATED EAST OF TEMECULA HIGH SCHOOL, SOUTH
OF RANCHO VISTA ROAD AND NORTH OF PAUBA ROAD.
BACKGROUND
The Planning Commission made a motion to approve Development Agreement No. 92-01,
Change of Zone No. 21 and Tentative Parcel Map No. 27314, Amendment No. 3; however,
the motion failed to pass on a 2-2 vote, resulting in a recommendation of denial with
Commissioner Blair abstaining because of a conflict of interest. The Commission was
concerned about the Development Agreement and the lack of environmental information, both
of which resulted from the absence of a specific development proposal (i.e. Plot Plan).
In the Commission's opinion, the Development Agreement was not flexible in regards to
potential changes (i.e. lot sizes); they were also concerned that no specific project was
proposed.
It is necessary to provide a brief explanation on why a Development Agreement was for this
R:~S\STAFFRPT\21CZ.CC 6/2/93 klb 1
project. Since the development of this project as a senior housing complex required a zone
change from R-R to R-3, staff was concerned about the potential development of the site as
a high density apartment complex permitted under the R-3 zone. One way to insure the
development of the site as a senior housing complex as opposed to high density apartments
was to record a Development Agreement. As a result, the zone change is tied to the
developer's performance on the construction of the project as specified in the Development
Agreement.
The Development Agreement requires the developer to comply with a Development Schedule,
(refer to Exhibit "C" of Attachment No. 3, Page 20 which is within attachment No. 3 of this
report).
It was the Commission's opinion that because there was no specific project proposal, the
environmental impacts of this project could not be adequately assessed (i.e. noise and light
impacts from the two schools on either side of the project which might raise an issue
regarding the compatibility of the project with the adjacent schools). Furthermore, the Traffic
Study only assessed the impacts of 240 dwelling units on Parcel 2 where 380 units could
ultimately be built·
The two Commissioner's who voted for the project requested that the Development
Agreement be simplified to just require the development of a senior housing project and to
allow an opportunity to further mitigate the environmental impacts of the project at the Plot
Plan stage. The other two Commissioners felt they could not recommend approval of this
project without the benefit of a specific development project (I.e. plot plan).
FISCAL IMPACT
None.
Attachments:
2.
3.
4.
Resolution No. 93- - Page 3
Draft Planning Commission Minutes (April 5, 1993) - Page 7
Planning Commission Staff Report (April 5, 1993) - Page 8
Development Fee Checklist - Page 9
R:\S\STAFFRPT~21CZ.CC 6/2/93 Id'o 2
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
R:~SXSTAFFRI~T\21CZ.CC 6/2193 lab 3
ATTACItM~.NT NO. 1
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF ~ CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA DENYING DEVEI OPMY-NT AGREEMF. NT
NO. 92-1, CHANGE OF ZONE NO. 21, AND TENTATIVE
PARCEI. MAP NO. 27314, AMENDMI~.NT NO. 3 TO
ENSURE ~ DEVELOPMI~NT OF THE PROJECT AS
SENIOR HOUSING, CONGREGATE CARE FACILITY,
SKII.I.ED NURSING, PERSONAL CARE, A NINE HOLE
PRIVATE GOLF COURSE AND DEDICATION OF A
NET ACRE PARCEl. TO ~ CITY OF TEMECULA FOR
A SENIOR CITIZEN CENTER, A ZONE CHANGE FROM R-
R (RURAL RESIDENTIAL) TO R-3 (GENERAL
RESIDENTIAL) AND TO SUBDIVIDE A 96.7 ACRE
PARCEL INTO 4 PARCELS AND A 48.4 ACRE
REMAINDER PARCEL LOCATED EAST OF TEMECULA
HIGH SCHOOL, SOUTH OF RANCHO VISTA ROAD AND
NORTH OF PAUBA ROAD.
WI-W~REAS, Linfield School fried Development Agreement No. 92-1, Change of Zone
No. 21, and Tentative Parcel Map No. 27314, Amendment No. 3 in accordance with the
Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has
adopted by reference;
WHEREAS, said applications were processed in the time and manner prescribed by State
and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered said applications on April 5, 1993,
at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition;
~, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, the Commission
recommended denial of said applications;
WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a public hearing pertaining to said applications
on June 8, 1993, at which time interested persons had opportunity to testify either in support or
opposition to said applications; and
WHEREAS, the City Council received a copy of the Commission proceedings and Staff
Report regarding the applications;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
DOES RF-~OLVE, DETER.MINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
R:\S\STAFFP, PT~ICZ.CC 6/2/93 kib 4
Section 1. Findings. That the Temecula City Council hereby makes the foilowing
findings:
A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly incorporated city shall
adopt a general plan within thirty (30) months following incorporation. During that 30-month
period of time, the city is not subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or the
requirements of state law that its decisions be consistent with the general plan, if all of the
following requirements are met:
general plan.
The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of the
2. The planning agency finds, in approving projects and taking other actions,
including the issuance of building permits, each of the following:
a. Them is a reasonable probability that the land use or action
proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which
will be studied within a reasonable time.
b. Them is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or
interference with the future adopted general plan ff the proposed use or action is ultimately
inconsistent with the plan.
c. The proposed use or action complied with all other applicable
requirements of state law and local ordinances.
B. The Riverside County General Plan, as amended by the Southwest Area
Community Plan, (hereina~er "SWAP") was adopted prior to the incorporation of Temecula as
the General Plan for the southwest portion of Riverside County, including the area now within
the boundaries of the City. At this time, the City has adopted SWAP as its General Plan
guidelines while the City is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of its General
Plano
C. The City Council in denying the pr6posed applications, makes the following
findings, to wit:
Change of Zone No. 21
1. The impacts of the Change of Zone could not be determined on the
surrounding properties due to insufficient information provided by the applicant. As a result,
impacts such as glare, noise, and traffic likely to be increased by the proposed change of zone
could not be adequately assessed and a presumption that the proposed zone change would have
a negative impact on surrounding land uses was required to be made.
Tentative Parcel Map No. 27314, Amendment No. 3
1. The Tentative Parcel Map could not be approved since the Change of Zone
R:XS\STAFFRPT~21CZ. CC 612193 irdb 5
application was denied.
Section 2. Conditions. That the City of Temecula City Council hereby denies
Development Agreement No. 92-1, Change of Zone No. 21, and Tentative Parcel Map No.
27314, Amendment No. 3 to ensure the development of the project as senior housing, congregate
care facility, skilled nursing, personal care, a nine hole private goff course and dedication of a
2.3 net acre parcel to the City of Temecula for a senior citizen center, a zone change from R-R
(Rural Residential) to R-3 (General Residential) and to subdivide a 96.7 acre parcel into 4
parcels and a 48.4 acre remainder parcel located east of Temecula High School, south of Rancho
Vista Road and north of Pauba Road.
Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPT!~-!~ this 8th day of June, 1993.
ATTEST:
J. SAL MU OZ
MAYOR
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
C/TY OF TEMECB)
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City
Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 8th day of June, 1993
by the following vote of the City Council:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
C OLrNCKIVIBIBERS:
COLrNCRA4RMBERS:
COUNC~LMB,IBERS:
JUNE S. GI~R~
CITY CLERK
R:XS\STAFFRPT\21CZ.CC 6/2/93 lab 6
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES (APRIL 5, 1993)
R:\S\STAFFP, PT~21CZ. CC 6/2193 klb 7
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT (APRIL 5, 1993)
R:\S\STAFFRPT~21CZ. CC 6/2/93 klb 8
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES APRIL 5, 1993
existing enants.
Stoney Mit~ h, 28822 Front Street, Temecula, expressed that h~ the skating rink
and the teen lub are rarely used and the proposed club will ~)~ interfere with either
of these proje s.
Leroy LeBlanc, 4 41 Quiet Meadow Road, Temecula spoke in opposition to the
proposed project. r. LeBlanc stated that he experie ed excessive noise and foot
traffic during the ope tion of the teen nightclub.
nightclub. Mr. Alberts point out that he feel: here was a relation to the opening of
t there were
complaints from neighbors, the would work with the neighbors to
rectify the problem.
Commissioner Chiniaeff stated tha' ff reports indicates findings have been made
which show that the project is no ible use, with the youth activities currently
in the same area as the pro project.
Commissioner Blair concurr with Commissio er Chiniaeff.
It was moved by Commi io Chiniaeff, seconde by Commissioner Ford to close the
public hearing at 7:55 .M. and Adopt Resolution o. 93- denying PA93-0038,
M~nor Conditional Us Permi , based on the analysis a findings contained in the staff
reiPort. ~
The motion cart' , I as follows:
: : . ~lZ~re Ch~maeff For Hoagland Fahey
Chairman declared a recess at 7 55 P M Th 05 P M
, : . . · : . .
9. Development Aareement No. 92-1 (DA 92-1 ), Change of Zone No. 21 and Tentative
Parcel MaD No. 27314
A request to subdivide a 96.7 acre parce~ into 4 parcels and a 48.4 acre remainder
parcel, a Development Agreement to ensure the development of the project as senior
housing, congregate care facility, skilled nursing, personal care, a nine hole private golf
course and dedication of a 2.3 net acre parcel to the City of Temecula for a Senior
PCMIN4/05/93 -7- 4t9193
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
APRIL 5, 1993
Citizen Center, and a Zone Change from R-R (Rural Residential) to R-3 (General
Residential) located at Linfield Christian School, east of Temecula High School, south
of Rancho Vista Road and North of Pauba Road.
Commissioner Blair stepped down due to a conflict of interest and excused herself
from the remainder of the meeting.
Senior Planner Debbie Ubnoske presented the staff report. Ms. Ubnoske advised of
minor changes to the Public Works Conditions of Approval and changes made to the
Development Agreement by the Planning Department as follows:
Page 6, 4.(b); Page 14, 16.3(e); and Page 15, 19.(f).
Commissioner Chiniaeff expressed concern that the Development Agreement states
that the environmental impacts of the agreement have been reviewed and the negative
impacts have been mitigated, However no plot plan has been submitted.
Planning Director Gary Thornhill clarified that the Development Agreement applies to
the Tentative Parcel Map and the Change of Zone and not the Plot Plan.
Chairman Fahey expressed concern that based on the conceptual plot plan, the
applicant will not be able to get the proposed densities for the project with all the
issues adequately mitigated.
Chairman Fahey opened the public hearing at 8:25 P.M.
Kim Eldridge, 41090 Avenida Verde, Temecula, Director of Development at the Linfield
School, advised the Commission that the applicant understands that there are a lot of
issues that will come up at the plot plan stage, however they are willing to work with
the City in whatever respect they want to make sure that the project is compatible
with what the City wants. Mr. Eldridge told the Commission that the applicant is
trying to get the entitlemerits initially.
Commissioner Hoagland expressed that he feels the idea of a senior center between
two high schools is an incompatible use.
Commissioner Chiniaeff stated that he does not have enough detail in the findings to
make a decision on the compatibility of the project.
Chait"man Fahey stated that she has no problems with the concept of the proposed
project, however she is not satisfied with the language in the Development Agreement.
Planning Director Thornhill advised the Commission they could refer this item back to
staff for clarification of issues regarding the Development Agreement or continue the
item and request the applicant to apply for a plot plan.
PCMIN4/05/93 -8- 4/9/93
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
APRIL 5, 1993
It was moved by Chairman Fahey, seconded by Commissioner Ford to recommend to
the City Council Change of Zone No. 21 and Tentative Parcel Map 27314, Amendment
No. 3, provided the Development Agreement reflects the original intentions which were
to restrict it to a senior project, requiring full mitigation of all issues at the plot plan
stage.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 2 COMMISSIONERS: Ford, Fahey
NOES: 2 COMMISSIONERS: Chiniaeff, Hoagland
ABSENT: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSTAIN: 1 COMMISSIONERS: Blair
PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT
Planning Director Gary Thornhill advised of the following:
Advised the Commission of the outcome
for property owners. Director Thornhill
on April 7, 1993.
a Old Town Specific Plan meeting
that the next meeting will be
Distributed a memorandum from Bria~
County Habitat Conservation Age~
Gnatcatcher as an endangered s
.oew, Executive Director of the Riverside
regarding the listing of the California
Installation of the Sierra Tracki
Invited the Commissioners tc
Department.
System has been completed at City Hall.
9 Draft Budget prepared for the Planning
PLANNING COMMISSION DISCUSSI(
Commissioner Hoagland comm~
Journal titled "How Well Do You
staff on their ability to use the
OTHER BUSINESS
that he ad read an article in the Planning Commissioner
Your Ti e" and Commissioner Hoagland complimented
spent aetings very well.
None
PCMIN4/05/93 -9-
419/93
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Planning Commission
Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning
April 5, 1993
MEMORANDUM
Development Agreement No. 92-1, Change of Zone No..21, Tentative Parcel
Map No. 27314, Amendment No. 3; Unfield School
Prepared by:
Saied Naaseh
RECOMMENDATION:
RECOMMEND Adoption of Negative Declaration for Development
Agreement No. 92-1 ,' Change of Zone No. 21, Tentative Parcel
Map No. 27314, Amendment No. 3; and
ADOPT Resolution No. 93- recommending Approval for
Development Agreement No. 92-1, Change of Zone No. 21, and
Tentative Parcel Map No. 27314, Amendment No. 3 based on
the Analysis and Findings contained in the Staff Report, subject
to the attached Conditions of Approval and subject to the City
Council action on changing the land use designation of Parcel No.
2 from public Institutional to High Density Residential prior to
adoption of the General Plan.'.
BACKGROUND
This project was continued from the March 1, 1993 Planning Commission meeting. At the
March 1, 1993 meeting, two commissioners were absent and one stepped down due to a
conflict of interest. Although an action could have been taken, the Commission recommended
a continuance to allow for all the commissioners to hear the item. The public hearing was
opened by the Commission and one person from the audience expressed some concerns about
the conceptual site plan for the Linfield School site which was not under consideration that
night.
R:%S~STAFFRFT~7314.PC2 3/31/93 tie 1
ANALYSIS
The only changes to the 'March 1, 1993 staff report are to the Public Works' conditions of
approval. Tl%ese changes are very minor. The changes to the conditions of approval are for
clarification purposes and do not change the content of the conditions. Staff is also
recommending three changes to the Development Agreement. Following are the
recommended changes to the Development Agreement:
Paae 14 ,
"16.3. (e) Constitute a project requiring a Subsequent or Supplemental Environmental Impact
Report pursuant to Section 21166 of the Public Resources Code."
Staff is recommending that this be deleted.
PaQe 6
"4.(b) Should the Owner: (i) fail to obtain all Subsequent Development Approvals to develop
and complete the Project, or (ii) breach the Development Schedule, Owner agrees to City
amending the land use designation to Low Medium Donaity Reaidontial or Public Institutional,
and amending the zoning to Single Family Reoidontial (R 1) or Public Institutional."
Staff is recommending that the amended language be approved.
PaQe 15
"19.(f) Upon a findin. g of material breach of this Agreement, and the failure of Owner to
successfully challenge the same in a court of law, City may not only terminate this
Agreement, but also shall amend the land use designation of the Property to Public
Institutional In,3titutionol or Low. Medium Dorv3ity Residential, and amend the zoning to Public
Institutional Single Family Residential (FI 1 ); Owner further agrees to such amendments."
Staff is recommending that the amended language be approved.
Attachments:
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Resolution No. 93- - Blue Page 3
Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 9
Development Agreement - Blue Page 26
Planning Commission Minutes, March 1, 1993 - Blue Page 27
Memorandum to Planning Commission, March 1, 1993 - Blue Page 28
Planning Commission Staff Report, March 1, 1993 - Blue Page 29
R:~S~STAFF~7314.PC2 3/31/93 tie 2
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
PC RESOLUTION NO. 93-'
R:%S~STAFFRPT'%27314.pC2 3/31/93 tie 3
PC RE~OLUTION NO. 9:3-
A RESOLUTION OF Ti:tY. PLANNING COMMISSION OF
~ CITY OF TI~!ECUIA RECO~ING APPROVAL
OF DEVELO~ AGREEMEYr NO. 97.-1, CHANGE OF
ZONE NO. 21 TO CHANGE ~ ZONING FROM R-R TO
R-3, AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 27314,
~lvtt~r NO. 3 T0. SUBDIVIDE A 96.9 ACRE
PARCEI, INTO FOUR (4) PARCF-L~I AND A Rb'~L4JNDER
PARCEL SUBJECT TO ~ CITY COUNCIL ACTION ON
CHANGING THF. LAND USE DF--~IGNATION OF PARCF. L
NO. 2 OF TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 27314,
AMEND~ NO. 3 FROM PUBLIC INSTITUTIONAL TO
HIGH-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL LOCATED NORTH OF
PAUBA ROAD, SOUTH OF RANCHO VISTA ROAD AND
EAST OF ~ TEMECULA V.ALLEy mGH SCHOOL.
WllF-REAS, The Lin~eld School filed Development Agreement No. 92-1, Change of
Zone No. 21 and Parcel Map No. 27314, Amendment No. 3 in accordance with the Riverside
County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted
by reference;
WHEREAS, said applications were processed in the time and manner prescribed by State
and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered said applications on April 5, 1993,
at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition;
WItF~REAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, the Commission
recommended approval of said applications;
NOW, TIt'ER!~J~ORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF ~ CITY OF
TEMECULA DOES RF-~OLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Findings. That the Temecula Planning Commission hereby makes the
following findings:
A. Pursuant 'to Government Cede Section 65360, a newly incorporated city shall
adopt a general plan within thirty (30) months following incorporation. During that 30-month
period of time, the city is not subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or the
requirements of state law that its decisions be consistent with the general plan, if all of the
following requirements are met:
general plan.
The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of the
F~:%S%STAFFRPT%.27314.PC2 3/31/93
2. The planning agency finds, in approving projects and taking other actions,
including the issuance of bufiding permits, each of the following:
a. There is a reasonable pwbability that the land use or action
proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which
will be studied within a reasonable time.
b.' There is little or no pwbability of substantial detriment to or
interference with the future adopted general plan if'the proposed use 'or action is' ultimately
inconsistent with the plan. '
c. The proposed use or action complied with all other applicable
requirements of state hw and local ordinances.
B. The Riverside County General Plan, as mended by the Southwest Area
Community Plan, (hereinafter "SWAP") was adopted prior to the incorlxntiun of Temecuh as
the General Plan for the southwest portion of Riverside County, including the area now within
the boundaries of the City. At this time, the City has adopted SWAP as its General Plan
guidelines while the City is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparelion of its General
Plan.
C. The Planning Commission in recommending appwval of said applications makes
the following findings, to wit:
Development Agreement No. 92-1
General Plan.
The City is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of its
2. Them is a reasonable pwbability that the project will be consistent with
the general plan proposal presen~y being considered subject to the City Council approving a
High-Density Residential designation for Parcel No. 2 of Tentative Parcel Map No. 27314,
Amendment No. 3, since the project wffi be compatible with surrounding uses and will carry out
the policies intended for the General Plan.
3. There is little or no pwbability of substantial detriment to or interference
with the future adopted general plan if the project is ultimately inconsistent with the plan, since
this project will not have a negative impact on the surrounding uses.
4. The project complies with all other applicable requirements of state hw
and local ordinances.
5. The environmental impacts of the agreement have been reviewed and all
measures deemed feasible to mitigate adverse impacts thereof have been incorporated into the
City appwvals for the project.
R:%S~STAFFRFr1'~7314.PC2 3/31/93 tie 5
6. No other mitigation measures for environm~ntalimpacts created by the
project, as presen~y approved shah be required for development of the project unless mandated
by laws.
7. The City may, pursuant to and in ~ce with its rules, regulations,
and ordinances, conduct an environmental review of subsequent discretionary entiflements for
the development of the ~ or any changes, amendments, or modifications to the property.
The City, as a result of such review, my impose additional measures (or cOnditions) on studies
to mitigate as. permitted by law the adverse environmental impacts .of. such development
enti~ement which Were. not considered or mitigated at the time of approval of the .project.
Change of Zone No. 21
1. There is a reasonable probability that Change of Zone No. 21 will be'
consistent with the City's future General Plan subject to the City Council approving a High-
Density Residential designation for Parcel No. 2 of Tentative Parcel Map No. 27314,
Amendment No. 3, which will be completed in a reasonable time and in accordance with State
Law, due to the fact that the future development of the site wffi be controlled by a Development
Agreement which is consistent with City'S policies for the new General Plan. '
2. There is not a likely probability of substantial detriment to or interference
with the future General Plan, if Change of Zone No. 21 is ultimately inconsistent with the plan,
due to fact that the development of the site wffi be controlled by a Development Agreement
which is consistent with the City's policies for the future General Plan.
Tentative Parcel Map No. 27314. Amendment No. 3
1. Them is a reasonable probability that Tentative Parcel Map No. 27314,
Amendment No. 3 wffi be consistent with the City's future General Plan subject to the City
Council approving a High-Density Residential designation for Parcel No. 2 of Tentative Parcel
Map No. 27314, Amendment No. 3, which will be completed in a reasonable time and in
accordance with State law. The project, as conditioned, conforms with existing applicable city
zoning ordinances and. development standards.
2. Them is not a likely probability of substantial detriment to, or interference
with the City' s future General Plan, if the proposed use is ultimately inconsistent with the Plan,
since the future development of the site will be controlled by a Development Agreement which
is consistent with the City's policies for the new General Plan.
3. The proposed use or action as conditioned complies with State planning
and zoning laws. Reference local Ordinances No. 348,460; and California Governmental Code
Sections 65000-66009 (Planning and Zoning Law).
s
health or welfare.
The project as designed and conditioned will not adversely affect the public
R:~S%STAFFRFT~7314.pC2 3/31/93 tie 6
5. The project is compatible with surrounding land uses since the proposal
will not have a negative impact on the existing school sites to the east and west and the existing
and propose~. single-family dwellings to the north and south.
6. The project has acceplable access to dedicated rights-of-way which ar~
Open to, 'and useable by, vehicular inf~. The project draws access from Pauba Road and
Rancho Vista Road, improved dedicated City rights-of-way. Project access, as designed and
condi~oned, conforms with applicable City lv,-ngineering standards and ordinances.
7. The proj~t as designed and condi~o~ed will not adversely affect the built
or natural environment as determined in the Environmental Analysis' for this project.
8. Said findings are supported by minutes, maps, exhibits and environmental
documents associated with this application and herein incorporated by reference, due to the fact
that they are referenced in the attached Staff Report, Exhibits, Environmental Assessment, and
Conditions of Approval.
F.. As conditioned pursuant to Section 3, the Paw~l Map proposed is compatible with
the health, safety and weftare of the COmmUnity.
Section 2. Environmental Compliance. An Initial Study prepared for this project
indicates that .the proposed project will not have a significant impact on the environment with
the incorporation of the mitigation measures into the project design, and a mitigated Negative
Declaration, is hereby granted.
Section 3. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby
recommends approval of Development Agreement 92-1, Change of Zone No. 21, and Tentative
Parcel Map No. 27314, Amendment No. 3-located north of Pauba Road, south of Raneho Vista
Road and east of the Temecula Valley High School subject to City Council approval of a High-
Density Residential designation for Parcel No. 2 of Parcel Map No. 27314, Amendment No. 3
and subject to the following conditions:.
A. Attachment No. 3, attached hereto.
R:%S%STAFFRPT~27314.PC2 3/31/93 tie 7
Section 4. PASSED, AI'FROVI~ AND ADOPTED this 5th day of April, 1993.
I HER!~,Ry CERTIFY that the foregoing Re~lution .was duly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Temecuh at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 5th .day of April,
I993 by the following vote of the Commission:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
G~Y~ORN'HHJ,
S~RET~Y
R:%S%STAFFRP1~7314.pC2 3/31/93 tie 8
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
R:%S~STA,","~,~"T%27314.pC2 3/31/93 tie 9
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Tentative Parcel Map No. 27314, Amendment No. 3
Project Description: To create four (4) parcels and a
remainder parcel
Assessor's Parcel No.: 955-020-002
Approval Date:
Expiration Date: .. "
WITHIN FORTY-BGHT (48) HOURS OF THE APPROVAL OF THIS PROJECT
The aPplicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or
money order payable to the County Clerk in the amount of One Thousand Three
Hundred dollars ($1,300.00), which includes the On Thousand Two Hundred and Fifty
Dollar ($1,250.00) fee, in compliance with AB 3158, required by Fish and Game Code
Section 711.4(d)(2) plus the Fifty. Dollar (e50.00) County administrative fee to enable
the City to file the Notice of Determination required under Public Resources Code
Section 21152 and 14 California Code of Regulations 15075. If within such forty-
eight (48) hour period the applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning
Department the check required above, the approval for the project granted herein shall
be void by reason of failure of condition, Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c).
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
The tentative subdivision shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act
and to all the requirements of Ordinance No. 460, unless modified by the conditions
listed below. A time extension may be approved in accordance with the State Map
Act and City Ordinance, upon written request, if made 30 days prior to the expiration
date.
The subdivider shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Temecula, it
agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City
of Temecula, its advisory agencies, appeal boards or legislative body concerning
Tentative Parcel Map No. 27314, Amendment No. 3, which action is brought within
the time period provided for in California Government Code Section 66499.37. The
City of Temecula will promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or
proceeding against the City of Temecula and will cooperate fully in the defense. If the
City fails to promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action~ or proceeding or
fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the subdivider shall not, thereafter, be
responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City of Temecula.
If subdivision phasing is proposed, a phasing plan shall be submitted to and approved
by the Planning Director.
The project and all subsequent projects within this site shall be subject to Development
Agreement No. 92-1.
R:~S~STAFFRFT~7314.PC2 3/31/93 tj8 10
10.
11.
The applicant shall consult the Army Corps of Engineers and the California Department
of Fish and Game prior to designing the site plan for the project to mitigate the impacts
to the wetlands as identified in the Figure 2 of Biological Report which includes the
unve{}etated alluvial wash and the Southern Willow Scrub. A proof of this consultation
shall be submitted to the Planning Department along with the Plot Plan or Conditional
Use Permit applications. These applications shall not be deemed complete without the
proof of consultation with both of these agencies.
All-development proposals within this project shall be subject to further approvals of
the City of Temecula which include but are not limited to Plot Plans' and Conditional
Use Permits.
A full disclosure shall be made to all prospective residents, whether buyers or renters,
that the existing Temecula Valley High School football stadium, tennis courts and other
related facilities will be used extensively for ball games, practices, rock concerts and
community activities. These events occur during both the daytime and evening hours
and will generate considerable noise and light. The Temecula Valley Unified School
District will not accept responsibility for the impact that these activities may have on
the neighboring complexes, nor will any of these conditions be subject to mitigation
by the district. The disclosure shall be made at the time of initial marketing and
through individual grant deeds. The specific form of the disclosure shall be approved
by the Planning Director and the City Attorney prior to issuance' of building permits.
The proposed project will be impacted by the Temecula Valley High School stadium
noise and light. The following shall be implemented prior to approval of any Plot Plans
or Conditional Use Permits:
A noise study shall be submitted. This study shall examine the impact of the
stadium on the proposed residences. Mitigation measures shall be included in
the study including but not limited to building setbacks from the westerly
property line, walls, landscaping, building orientation and building design.
These mitigation measures shall reduce the maximum interior noise level to 45
Ldn and the exterior noise level to 65 Ldn. Tests shall be conducted during
sporting events and other special events scheduled for the stadium.
A light impact study shall be Submitted. Mitigation measures shall be
incorporated into the project design including but not limited to building
setbacks from the westerly property line, walls, landscaping, building
orientation and building design. These .mitigation measures shall reduce the
impact to a level of insignificance as determined by the Planning Director.
The entrance gates to the private roads in the multi-family senior complex, if proposed,
shall be set back sufficiently to allow for stacking of cars to avoid blocking the right:of-
way. This condition shall be complied with prior to approval of the Plot Plan.
A pedestrian friendly circulation system shall be designed tO separate the pedestrian
and auto circulations by linking parking lots, building and recreation areas together by
accent paving, cross walks, lighting, landscaping and signage.
R:~,SLSTAFFRPT~7314.pC2 3/31/93 tim 11
12.
The architecture and the landscaping of the project shall take into account the
surrounding single-family units and schools and effectively buffer them with
landscaping or create a pleasing facade to the neighboring properties especially the
single;family units.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS
13.
14.
A Mitigation Monitoring Program shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning
Director.
A copy of the ROugh Grading plans shall be submitted ;~o and approved by the Planning
Director. .
15.
A Biology Study shall be prepared for the subject pr'operty by a Biologist and submitted
to the Planning Director for review. Should Stephens' Kangaroo Rat (Dipodomys'
stephensi) habitat or other sensitive habitat be determined to exist upon the site, then
mitigation measures shall be included in the Mitigation Monitoring Program. If no
habitat is determined to exist, then the applicant shall comply with the provisions of
Ordinance No. 663 by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that ordinance. Should
Ordinance No. 663 be superseded by the provisions of a Habitat Conservation Plan
prior to the payment of the fee required by Ordinance No. 663, the applicant shall pay
the fee required by the Habitat Conservation Plan as implemented by County Ordinance
or Resolution.
16.
17.
A qualified Paleontologist/archaeologist shall be chosen by the developer and approved
by the Planning Director for consultation and comment on the proposed grading with
respect to potential Paleontological/archaeological impacts. Should the
Pa. leontologist/archaeologist find potential is high for impact to significant resources,
pnor to commencement of the grading operations a meeting between the
Paleontologist/archaeologist, Planning Director staff and the excavation and grading
contractor shall be arranged. Mitigation measures shall be approved by the Planning
Director and included in a Mitigation Monitoring Program. When necessary, the
Paleontologist/archaeologist or representative shall have the authority to temporarily
divert, redirect or halt grading activity to allow recovery of fossils.
The following shall be submitted to'and approved bY the'Planning Director:
A. A copy of the Conceptual Landscape Plans to include:
(1) Drought tolerant plants.
(2)
All plants meeting the following minimum size requirements:
(a)
(b)
(c)
All trees shall be a minimum of 15 gallon with at least 50
percent of trees with a minimum of 24 inch box.
All shrubs shall be a minimum of 5 gallons.
All ground cover shall be a minimum of 8" on the center
R:%S%STAFFRPT%.27314.pC2 3/31/93
(3) Landscaping for the following:
(a) The golf course.
(b) Typical slope conditions.
(c) Private common areas including all improvements.
(d)
Shrub planting to completely screen perimeter walls .adjacent to
a public right-of~way equal to sixty-six (66) feet or larger.
(e) Parkways.
(f) All other interior landscaping.
{g)
Screening the residences on Parcel No. 2 from the stadium with
a combination of different species of fast growing and tall trees.
{h)
All existing trees. Any existing trees that are removed as a
result of this project shall be replaced with a ratio of 5:1. This
replacement shall be over and above other ordinance
requirements,
(4) Hardscaping for the following:
(a) Pedestrian trails within private common areas.
(5) The height, location and the following materials for all walls and fences:
(a)
DecOrative block for the perimeter of the project adjacent to a
public right-of-way equal to sixty-six (66) feet or larger.
(b)
Wrought iron or decorative block and wrought iron combination
to take advantage of views. '.
(c) Wood fencing shall be used 'only in the interior of the project.
A copy of the construction, landscape and irrigation plans consistent with the
conceptual landscape plans.
Ce
A Security Performance Bond shall be secured with the Planning Director to
insure the installation of landscaping along the westerly property line to screen
the high school stadium immediately after grading operations have been
completed.
PRIOR TO RECORDATION OF THE FINAL MAP
18. The following shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Director:
A. A copy of the Final Map
R:%S%STAF~?314.PC2 3/31/93 tj~ 13
A copy of the Rough Grading Plans
A copy of the Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) with the following notes:
(1)
This property is located within thirty (30) miles of Mount Palomar
Observatory. All proposed outdoor lighting systems shall comply with
the California Institute of Technology, Palomar Observatory
recommendations.
(2) .The 100 year flood plain areas shall be delineated. ' '
(3) Drainage easements shall be' kept free of buildings and obstructions.
(4)
A fifty (50) foot wide easement shall be recorded on both sides of the
wetland habitats as identified in the Biological Report and shall be
designated a biological open space. The area within this easement may
be incorporated into the design of the golf course. (This condition may
be waived by the Planning Director if the applicant submits proof of
mitigation acceptable to the Department of Fish and Game and the Army
Core of Engineers that waves the requirement for this easement).
A copy of the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&R's)
(1)
CC&R's shall be reviewed and approved' by the Planning Department.
The CC&R's shall include liability insurance and methods of maintaining
open space, recreation areas, parking areas, private roads, exterior of all
buildings and all landscaped and open areas including parkways.
(2)
No lot or dwelling unit in the development shall be sold unless a
corporation, association, property owner's group or similar entity has
been formed with the right to assess all properties individually owned or
jointly owned which have any rights or interest in the use of the
common areas and common facilities in the development, such
assessment power to be sufficient to meet the expenses of such entity,
and with authority to control, and the-duty 'to maintain, all of said
mutually available features of the development. Such entity shall
operate under recorded CC&R's which shall include compulsory
membership of all owners of lots and/or dwelling units and flexibility of
assessments to meet changing costs of maintenance, repairs, and
services. Recorded CC&R's shall permit enforcement by the City for
provisions required as Conditions of Approval. The developer shall
submit evidence of compliance with this requirement to, and receive
approval of, the city prior to making any such sale. This condition shall
not apply to land dedicated to the City for public purposes.
(3)
Every owner of a dwelling unit or lot shall own as an appurtenance to
such dwelling unit or lot, either (1) an undivided interest in the common
areas and facilities, or (2) a share in the corporation, or voting
membership in an association owning the common areas and facilities.
R:LS~STAFFRRr~7314.PC2 3/31/93 tie 14
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS
19.
No building permits shall be issued by the City for any residential lot/unit within the
project boundary until the developer/owner or his/her sucCessor's-in-interest provides
evidence of compliance with public facility financing measures. A cash sum of one-
hundred dollars ($100.00) per lot/unit shall be deposited with the City as mitigation
for public library development.
20.
A 9400.00 per dwelling unit fire mitigation fee shall be assessed prior to issuance of
'building permits.
21.
A phasing plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning "Director for the
installation of the landscaping for parcel 2.
22.
Roof-mounted mechanical equipment shall not be permitted within the of the'
subdivision, however solar equipment or any other energy saving devices shall be
permitted with Planning Director approval.
23.
A copy of the construction, landscape and irrigation plans consistent with the
conceptual landscape plans shall be submitted and approved.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF OCCUPANCY PERMITS
24.
If deemed necessary by the Planning Director, the applicant shall provide additional
landscaping to effectively screen various components of the project.
25.
The applicant shall sign an agreement and/or post a bond with the City to insure the
maintenance of all landscaping within each parcel for a period of one year.
26.
All the conditions of approval shall be complied with to the satisfaction of the Director
of Planning, Public Works, Community Services and Building and Safety.
27. All landscaping for parcels 1,3 and 4 shall be installed.
28. The landscaping for 'parcel 2 shall be installed according ~.o a phasing plan.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
29.
It is understood that the developer correctly shows on the tentative map all existing
and proposed easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage
courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further
review and revision.
30.
A Grading Permit for either rough or precise (including all on-site flat work and
improvements) construction shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works
prior to commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained road right-
of-way.
R:%S~STAFFRFT~27314.PC2 3/31/93 tie 15
31.
32.
33.
PRIOR
34.
,35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
40.
An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior
to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City
right.-of-way.
All improvement plans, grading plans, and landscape and irrigation plans shall be
coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements
contiguous to the site.
. Pursuant to Section 66493 of the Subdivision Map Act,.any subdivision which is part
of an existing AsseSsment District must comply with the requirements of said section.
TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS
A copy of the grading and improvement plans, along with supporting hydrologic and
hydraulic calculations, shall be submitted to the Riverside County Flood Control and
Water .Conservation District for approval prior to recordation of the final map or
issuance of any permit. A permit from Riverside County Flood Control and Water
Conservation District is required for work within their right-of-way.
The final grading plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer end shall be
reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works.
All lot drainage shall 'be directed to the driveway by side yard drainage swales
independent of any other lot.
The developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board.
No grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent has been filed or the
project is shown to be exempt.
The developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies:
· San Diego Regional Water Quality
· Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
· Planning Department
· Department of Public Works'
· Riverside County Health Department
· Community Services District
· General Telephone
· Southern California Edison Company
· Southern California Gas Company
A Soils Report shall be prepared by a registered soils engineer and submitted to the
Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall
address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the
construction of engineered structures and pavement sections.
An erosion control plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and submitted
to the Department of Public 'Works for review' and approval.
R:LSLSTAFFI:~7314.pC2 3/31/93 tie 16
41.
42.
43.
44.
45.
46.
47.
48.
49.
Graded but undeveloped land shall be maintained in a weed-free condition and shall be
either planted with interim landscaping, or provided with other erosion control
measures as approved by the Department of Public Works.
A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the prevailing Area
Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new development. The charge is
payable to the Riverside County Rood Control and Water Conservation District prior
to issuance of permits. if the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has
already been credited to this property, no new charge needs to be ·paid..
The developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval .or easements for any off:
site work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public
Works at no cost to any agency.
The developer shall accept and properly dispose of all off-site drainage flowing onto
or through the site. In the event the Department of Public Works permits the use of
streets for drainage purposes, the provisions of Section XI of Ordinance No. 460 will
apply. Should the quantities exceed the street capacity, or use of streets be prohibited
for drainage purposes, the developer shall provide adequate facilities as approved by
the Department of Public Works.
The developer shall protect downstream properties from damage caused by .alteration
of the drainage patterns; i.e., concentration or diversion of flow. Protection shall be
provided by constructing adequate drainage facilities, including enlarging existing
facilities or by securing a drainage easement, or by incorporating on-site detention
basin facilities such that the downstream 100-year 'Q' is not increased as a result of.
the development of this project.
A drainage easement shall be obtained from the affected' property owners for the
release of concentrated or diverted storm flows onto the adjacent property. A copy
of the drainage easement shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for
review prior to recordation. The location of the recorded easement shall be delineated
on the grading plan.
A permit from the Riverside County Flood Control and' Water 'Conservation District is
required for work within their right-of-Way.
A site balanced mass grading plan for the entire project shall be approved by the
Department of Public Works prior to the issuance of any individual parcel's grading
permit and the individual grading plan shall conform to the mass grading plan.
Prior to the issuance of an individual parcel's grading permit, the associated future site
plan shall be approved. It is understood that the project site plan as submitted is for
the purpose of reviewing non-engineering issues. Specific engineering criteria will be
evaluated with future site plan applications. Proposed future site plans shall include,
but not be limited to, the following elements:
Existing and proposed storm drain facilities shall be shown on the future
proposed site plans along with associated easemerits. A drainage study shall
be provided to indicate said facilities and verify the adequacy of existing
R:%S%STAFFRPT~7314.pC2 3/31/93 tie 17
50.
51.
downstream facilities, otherwise the drainage study shall address the
requirements for on-site detention facilities designed to accommodate the 100-
year design runoff without negatively impacting the downstream facilities.
Proposed and existing sewer mains and lift station(s) shall be shown on future
site plans to ensure adequate service and readily available fall for the proposed
project. '
Proposed' and existing water mains..shall be shown on future site plans to
ensure that-service is readily available to the' proposed project.
Private roads included in future site plans MUST be designed to meet City Public Road
Standards or otherwise approved by the Department of Public Works. This should
include but may not be limited to:
Minimum road widths of 32-feet paved with 50-feet/60-feet right-of-ways or
easements (shown on typical section).
Knuckles being required at 90° 'bends' in the road.
Separation between on-site intersections shall meet current City Standards
(200-ft. minimum).
Cul-de-sac geometrics shall meet current City Standards.
Minimum safe horizontal centerline radii shall be required (all centerline radii
should be identified on the site plan).
90° parking immediately adjacent to the private streets shall be located a
minimum safe distance from intersections.
Distance to the nearest existing off-site access point on Rancho Vista Road and
· Pauba Road shall be identified on the site plan.
Identify whether gates will be proposed at entrances to project. If so,
configuration, stacking distance, and turn'around ability will need to be
reviewed and approved by the Fire Department and the Department of Public
Works during the Site Plan review stage.
All intersections shall be perpendicular (90°).
All driveways providing access to two or more buildings shall be designed as
a cul-de-sac or a loop road.
The future site plan application for the Senior Center shall reflect the rec~uirement for
a turn-around at the end of the driveway or loop extended around the buildings.
R:%S\STAFFRPT%27314.pC2 3/31/93 tim 18
52.
53.
54..
PRIOR
55.
56.
57.
The grading plan shall be designed to reflect the relocation of the existing reservoir on
the easterly edge of the project to be wholly contained within the remainder parcel.
The preliminary soils report submitted in conjunction with the project grading plan shall
addreiss the dike design necessary to accomplish this.
The grading plan shall be designed to reflect the relocation of the existing access road
to school facilities within the remainder parcel off-site.
Site plan applications which include development impacts over and above' those.
identifie~l in the approved Tentative Parcel Map/Development Agreement Traffic Study
(dated June, 1992) shall include an updated traffic study. This study may include, and
the Department of Public Works may condition, additional mitigation measures as
warranted.
TO THE ISSUANCE OF ENCROACHMENT PERMITS
All necessary grading permit requirements shall have been completed and approved.
Improvement plans including, but not limited to, streets, parkway trees, street lights,
driveways, drive aisles, parking lot lighting, drainage facilities and paving shall. be
prepared by a registered Traffic Engineer on 24" x 36" mylar sheets and approved by
the Department of Public Works..Final plans (and profiles on streets) shall show the
location of existing utility facilities and easements as directed by the Department of
Public Works.
The following criteria shall be observed in the design of the improvement plans to be
submitted to the Department of Public Works:
Flow line grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over
A.C. paving.
Be
Driveways shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula Standard Nos.
207/207A and 401 .(curb and sidewalk).
Street lights shall be installed. along the public streets adjoining the site in
accordance with Ordinance No. 461 and shall be shown on the improvement
plans as directed by the Department of Public Works.
Concrete sidewalks shall be constructed along public street frontages in
accordance with City Standard Nos, 400 and 401.
Improvement plans shall extend 300 feet beyond the project boundaries or as
otherwise approved by the Department of Public Works.
Minimum centerline radii shall be in accordance with City Standard No. 113 or
as otherwise approved by the Department of Public Works.
Ge
All reverse curves shall include a 100-foot minimum tangent section or as
otherwise approved by the Departmen~ of Public Works.
R:~,S%STAFFRPT~7314.PC2 3/31/93 tj8 19
58.
59.
60.
61,
62,
63.
PRIOR
64.
65.
All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees or as
approved by the Department of Public Works.
Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersections and
adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility.
All concentrated drainage directed towards the public street shall be conveyed
through under-sidewalk drains.
The minimum centerline grade for streets shall be 0.50 percent or as otherwise
approved by the Department of Public Works.
Improvement plans per City Standards for the private streets or drives shall be required
for review and approval by the Department of Public Works.
All utility systems including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer, and cable TV shall
be provided for underground, with easements provided as required, and designed and
constructed in accordance with City Codes and the utility provider. Telephone, cable
TV, and/or security systems shall be pre-wired in the residence.
All utilities, except electrical lines rated 33kv or greater, shall be installed underground.
All conditions of the grading permit and encroachment. permit shall be complied with
to the satisfaction of the Public Works Department.
A construction area traffic control plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer
and approved by the City Engineer for any street closure and detour or other disruption
to traffic circulation as required by the Department of Public Works.
TO RECORDATION OF FINAL MAP
Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid.
The developer shall construct or post security and enter into an agreement
guaranteeing the construction of the following public improvements within 18 months
in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the
Department of Public Works:
Street improvements, which may include, but are not limited to: pavement,
curb and gutter, sidewalks, drive approaches, street lights, signing, traffic
signals, and other traffic control devices as appropriate;
Storm drain facilities; '-
Landscaping (slopes and parkways);
D. Erosion control and slope protection;
E. Sewer and domestic water systems; and
R:~.S%STAFFRPT~27314.PC2 3/31/'93 tie 20
66.
67.
68.
69.
70.
71.
F. Undergrounding of proposed utility distribution lines.
As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
San Diego Regional Water Quality
Rancho California Water District
Eastern Municipal Water District
Riverside County Rodd Control and Water Conservation District
City of Temecula Fire Bureau ' '
Planning Department
Department of Public Works "
Riverside County Health Department
CATV Franchise
Community Services District
General Telephone
Southern California Edison Company
Southern California Gas Company
Fish and Game
Army Corps of Engineers
All road easements and/or street dedications shall be offered for dedication to the
public and shall continue in force until the City accepts or abandons such offers. All
dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the Department of
Public Works.
Complete half-street improvements in Pauba Road and Rancho Vista Road shall be
provided, or bonds for the street improvements may be posted, within the dedicated
right-of-way in accordance with City Standard No. 102 (88-ft/64-ft).
The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site property
interests, and if he/she should fail to do so, the developer shall, prior to submittal of
the final map for recordation, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements
pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act, Sections 66462 and 66462.5. Such agreement
shall provide for payment by the developer of all costs incb~red 'by the City to acquire
the off-site property interests required in connection with the subdivision. Security of
a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in
an appraisal report obtained by the developer, at the developer's cost. The appraiser
shall have been approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal.
Vehicular access shall be restricted on Pauba Road and Rancho Vista Road and so
noted on the final map with the exception of those access points and intersections
recommended per the approved Traffic Report and identified on the approved Tentative
Parcel Map.
A signing and striping plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and
approved by the Department of Public Works for Pauba Road and Rancho Vista Road
and shall be included in the street improvement plans.
R:%S%STAFFRPT~73'I4.PC2 3/33/93 tjo 2 1
72. Plans for a traffic signal shall be recommended by a registered Traffic Engineer and
shall be signed by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by the Department of Public
Works for the intersection of Pauba Road and Margarita Road and shall be included in
the ~treet improvement plans with the second plan check submittal,
73, A school zone signing and striping plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer
and approved by the Department of Public Works for the school site within this project.
This will be separate from the street improvement plans and will cover any and all
· streets necessary to provide the appropriate signing and striping,
74. Prior to designing any of the above plans, contact the 'Department of. Public ,Works fo~
the design requirements,
75.
Bus bays will be provided at all existing and future bus stops as determined by the
Department of Public Works.
76. A Transportation Demand Management program will be required.
77. Corner property line cutoff shall be required per Riverside County Standard No, 805,
78. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be required and shall be
delineated and noted on the final map.
79.
80.
81.
82.
83.
Easements for sidewalks for public uses shall be dedicated to the City where sidewalks
meander through private property,
An easement for a joint use driveway shall be provided prior to approval of the final'
map or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first.
Easements, when required for roadway slopes, landscape easements, drainage
facilities, utilities, etc., shall be shown on the final map if they are located within the
land division boundary. All offers of dedication and conveyances shall be submitted
for review and recorded as directed by the Department of Public Works. On-site
drainage facilities located outside of road right'of-way shall be contained within
.drainage easements and shown on the final map. 'A note shall be added 'to the final
map stating "drainage easements shall be kept free of buildings and obstructions."
Prior to recordation of the final map, an Environmental Constraints Sheet (ECS) shall
be prepared in conjunction with the final map to delineate identified environmental
concerns and shall be permanently filed with the office of the City Engineer. A copy
of the ECS shall be transmitted to the Planning Department for review and approval.
The following information shall be on the ECS:
The delineation of the area within the 100-year floodplain;
Special Study Zones.
The developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an ECS
recorded with any underlying maps related to the subject property.
R:~S%STAFFRPT~7314.pC2 3/31/~3 tie 22
84.
85.
86.
The developer shall deposit with the Department of Public Works a cash sum as
established per lot, as mitigation towards traffic signal impacts. Should the developer
choose to defer the time of payment of the 'traffic signal mitigation fee, he may enter
into ~ written agreement with the City deferring said payment to the time of issuance
of a building permit.
The developer shall notify the City's CA'IV Franchises of the Intent to Develop.
CondUit shall be installed' to CATV Standards at time of street improvements,
A declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&R's) shall be prepared by
the developer and submitted to the Director of Planning, City Engineer, and City
attorney. The CC&R's shall be signed and acknowledged by all parties having any
record title interest in the property to be developed, shall make the City a party
thereto, and shall be enforceable by the City. The CC&R's shall be reviewed and
approved by the City and recorded. The CC&R's shall be submitted to the following
Engineering conditions:
The CC&R's shall be prepared at the developer's sole cost and expense.
The CC&R's shall be in the form and content approved by the Director of
Planning, City Engineer, and the City Attorney, and shall include such provisions
as are required by this approval and as said officials deem'necessaryto protect
the interest of the City and its residents.
The CC&R's and Articles of rncorporation of the Property Owner's Association
are subject to the approval of Planning, Department of Public Works, and the
City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrent with the final map. A
recorded copy shall be provided to the City.
The CC&R's shall provide for the effective establishment, operation,
management, use, repair and maintenance of all common areas, drainage and
related facilities.
The CC&R's shall pro. vide that if the property is .not maintained in the Condition
required by. the CC&R's, then the City, after making due demand and giving
reasonable notice, may enter the' property and perform, at the owner's sole
expense, any maintenance required thereon by the CC&R's or the City
ordinances. The property shall be subject to a lien in favor of the City to secure
any such expense not promptly reimbursed.
(1)
All parkways, open areas, on-site slopes and landscaping shall be
permanently maintained by the association or other'means acceptable
to the City. Such proof of this maintenance shall be submitted to
Planning and the Department of Public Works prior to issuance of
building permits.
R:%S%STAFFRPT~27314.PC2 3/31/93 tim 23
PRIOR
87.
88.
89.
PRIOR
90.
91.
92.
(2)
Reciprocal access easements and maintenance agreements ensuring
access to all parcels and joint maintenance of all roads, drives or parking
areas shall be provided by CC&R's or by deeds and shall be recorded
concurrent with the map, or prior to the issuance of building permit
where no map is involved.
TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS
A precise grading plan shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review
and approval. 'The building pad shall be certified by a ~egistered Traffic Engineer for
location and ele~/ation, and the Soils Engineershall issue a Final Soils Report addressing
compaction and site conditions, " · ' ·
Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code,
the approved grading plan, the conditions of the grading permit, City Grading'
Standards, and accepted grading construction practices. The final grading plan shall
be in substantial conformance with the approved rough grading plan.
The developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities
imposed upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public facility
mitigation as required under the EIR/Negative Declaration for the project. The fee to
be paid shall be in the amount in effect at the time of payment of the fee. If an interim
or final public facility mitigation fee or district has not been finally established by the
date on which developer requests its building permits for the project or any phase
thereof, the developer shall execute the Agreement for payment of Public Facility fee,
a copy of which has been provided to developer. Concurrently with executing this
Agreement, developer shall post a bond to secure payment of the Public Facility fee.
The amount of the bond shall be $2.00 per square foot, not to exceed $10,000. The
developer understands that said Agreement may require the payment of fees in excess
of those now estimated (assuming benefit to the project in the amount of such fees).
By execution of this Agreement, the developer will waive any right to protest the
provisions of this Condition, of this Agreement, the formation of any traffic impact fee
district, or the process, levy, or collection of any traffic mitigation or traffic impact fee
for this project; provided that developer is not waiving its right to protest the
reasonableness of any traffic impact fee, and. the amount thereof.
TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY
All improvements shall be completed and in place per the.approved plans, including but
not limited to, curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, drainage
facilities, parkway trees and street lights on all interior public streets.
All signing and striping shall be installed per the approved signing and striping plan.
The traffic signal at Pauba Road and Margarita Road shall be installed and operational
per the special provisions and the approved traffic signal plan. (At the developer's
request, the City will enter into a reimbursement agreement for costs over and above
the approved project's impacts, as dictated by future approved traffic studies.)
R:\S%STAFFRFrFL27314.PC2 3/31/93 tie 24
93.
All school zone signing and striping shall be installed per the approved school zone
signing and striping plan.
94.
The developer shall provide 'STOP" controls at the intersection of local streets with
arterial streets as directed by the Department of Public Works.
95.
96.
Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersection and adjacent
to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance as directed by the Department of
Pub!ic Works.
o
Asphaltic emulsion (fog seal) shall be .aPplied only as directed by the Department of'
Public Works at a rate of 0.05 gallon per square yard. Asphalt emulsion shall conform
to Section Nos. 37, 39, and 94 of the State Standard Specifications.
OTHER AGENCIES
97.
The applicant shall comply with the environmental health recommendations outlined
in the Riverside County Health Department's transmittal dated July 1, 1992, a copy
of which is attached.
98.
The applicant shall comply with the fire improvement recommendations outlined in the
County of Riverside Fire Department's letter dated May 4, 1992, a copy of which is
attached.
99.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Eastern Municipal
Water District transmittal dated March 12, 1992, a copy of which is attached.
100. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Rancho California
Water District transmittal dated May 7, 1992, a copy of which is attached.
101. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Riverside Transit
Agency transmittal dated March 2, 1992, a copy of which is attached.
102.
The applicant. shall comply With the recommendations outlined in the. Temecula
Community Services District transmittal dated August 12, 1992, a copy of which is
attached.
R:~SXSTAFFRFT~7314.PC2 3/31/93 tie 25
ATi'ACHMENT NO. 3
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
R:%S%STAFRRPT~7314.pC2 3/31/93 t~ 26
RECORDED AT THE REQUEST OF
City Clerk
City of Temecula
WEEN RECORDED RETURN TO
City Clerk
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
DEVELOPMENT
CITY OF. TEMECULA
and
THE LINFIELD SCHOOL
R:~STA~D.TWO 3/31/93 ~s - 1 -
DEVELO~
BETWEEN
CITY OF TEM~CULA
and
THE LINFIELD SCHOOL
.This Development Agreement ("Agreement.) iS entered
into to be effective on the dace it is recorded with the
Riverside County Recorder (the "Effective Date.) hy and among the'
City of Temecula, a California municipal"corporation ('City") and
the persons and entities listed below ("Owner"):
THE LINFIELD SCHOOL
RECITALS
A. The legislature of the State of California has
adopted California Government Code Section 65864-65869.5
("Development Agreement Legislation") which authorizes a city to
enter into a binding development agreement with persons having
legal or equitable interests in real property located within a
city's municipal boundaries for the development of such
property.
B. Pursuant and subject to the Development Agreement
Legislation, the City's police powers and City Resolution No.
91-52, City is authorized to enter into binding agreements with
persons having legal or equitable interest in real property
located within the City's municipal boundaries under which such
property may be developed in the City.
C. In lieu of obtaining approval of'a Specific Plan
for the development of the Property, Owner has requested City to
consider entering into a development agreement relating to the
Property.
D. By electing to enter into this Agreement, City
shall bind future members of the City. Council of City by. the
obligations specified herein and further.limit the future'
exercise of certain governmental.and proprietary powers of and
members of the City Council.
E. The terms and conditions of this Agreement have
undergone extensive review by the staff of the City and the City
Council of City and have been found to be fair, just and
reasonable. '
F. City finds and determines that it will be in the
best interests of its citizens and th$ public health,. safety .and
welfare will be served by entering into this Agreement.
G. All of the procedures of the California
Environmental Quality Act have been met with respect to this
Agreement.
H. City was incorporated on December 1, 1989.
Pursuant to California Government Code Sections 65360 and 65361,
the City has forty-two (42) months following incorporation to
prepare and adopt a general plan. During this 42-month period,
the City may approve development projects without being subject
to the requirement that its decisions be consistent with the
R:~STA~Ln,TWO 3~1~ ~s - 2 -
general plan so long as the findings set forth in Section 65360
and the conditions of approval of the California Office Of
Planning.and Research are met.
"I. Pursuant to City Ordinance No. 90-4, the City has
adopted the County of Riverside's land use, subdivision and
mitigation fee ordinances as amended by City Ordinance Nos. 90-05
through 92-15. Pursuant to City ResOlution No. 90-31, the City
has adopted the Riverside County Southwest Area Co~iunity Plan
("SWAP"), as a planning _~uideline during the preparation of the
City's General Plan. ' .. .
J. The City Council of City hereby finds and
determines.that:
(1) The City is proceeding in a timely fashion
with the preparation of its general plan.
(2) There is a reasonable probability that the
Project will be consistent with the draft
general plan proposal presently being
considered.
(3) There is little or no probability of
substantial detriment to or interference with
the future adopted general plan if the
Project is ultimately inconsistent with the
plan.
(4) The Project 'complies with all other
applicable requirements of state law and
local ordinances.
K. Owner is the fee owner of a ninety-six and nine-
tenths (96.9) acre parcel of undeveloped land located South of
Rancho Vista Road, east of Temecula Valley High School and north
of Pauba Road, hereinafter referred to as the "Property" as
described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part herein
by this reference. This Agreement applies to the development of
a forty-eight and three-tenths (48.3)'acre portion of the
Property, comprised of Lots 1-4 of Tentative Parcel Map No
27314. '
L. City and Owner;desire that the Property be
developed as a Senior Citizen Housing Development.as further
described herein.. '
M. The City Council of City hereby finds and
determines that:
(1) The environmental impacts of this Agreement
have been reviewed and all measures deemed feasible to
mitigate adverse impacts thereof have been incorporated into
the City approvals for the Project.
(2) No other mitigation measures for
environmental impacts created by the Project, as presently
approved shall be required for development of the Project
unless mandated by law.
(3) City may, pursuant to and in accordance with
its rules, regulations, and ordinances, conduct an
environmental review of subsequent discretionary
entitlements for the development.of the Property or any
changes, amendments, or modifications to the Property. The
City, as a result of such review, may impose additional
measures (or conditions) to mitigate as permitted by law the
R:~AFFRI~.TWO 3~|~ ~, - 3 -
adverse environmental impacts of such development
entitlement which were not considered or mitigated at the
time of approval of the Project.
(4) Should the Owner propose more than 240
dwelling units for parcel 2 of the property then the
· environmental impacts of those additional units shall be
evaluated, and the City may condition the project as-necessary to
mitigate such additional units.
N. Within forty-eight (48) hours of the effective
date of this Agreement, Owner shall deliver to'the Planning
department a check payable to the County Clerk in the amount of
One Thousand Two Hundred Seventy~Five Dollars (1,300.00),.which
i~cludes the One Thousand Two Hundred Fifty Dollars ($1,250.00)
fee required by Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(d)(2) plus the
Twenty-Five Dollar ($50.00) County administrative fee to enable
the City to file the Notice of Determination required under
-Public Resources Code Section 21152 and 14 Cal. Code of
Regulations 15075. If within such forty-eight (48) hour period
the Owner has not delivered to the Planning Department the check
required above, this Agreement shall be void by reason of failure
of condition, Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c).
O. City Council of City has approved this Agreement'
-by Ordinance No. adopted on , 1993, and effective
on , 1993.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the above Recitals
and of the mutual covenants hereinafter contained and for other
good and valuable.consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of
which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree:
1. Definitions. In this Agreement, unless the
context.otherwise requires:
(a) "Congregate Care Facility, is a congregate
care residential facility developed pursuant to Riverside County
Ordinance No. 460, and Sections 8.1, 8.2, 19.101, 19.102 and
19.103 of Riverside County Ordinance No. 348.
(b) "City" is the City. of Temecula.
(c) "Development Approvals".means all those
discretionary land. use entitlements necessary to develop the
Property, including, but not limited to, zoning changes,
tentative subdivision maps, plot plans, and conditional use
permits.
(d) "Development Exaction" means any requirement
of City in connection with or pursuant to any Land Use Regulation
or Development Approval for the dedication of land, the
construction of improvements or public facilities, or the payment
of fees in order to lessen, offset, mitigate or compensate for
the impacts of development on the environment or other public
interests.
(e) "Development Plan" means the development of
the Property as depicted in Exhibit G.
(f) "Existing Development Approvals" means those
certain Development Approvals in effect as of the effective date
of this .Agreement with respect to the Property, including,
R:~S~STAFFRPT~L~rF~uLD.T~/O 3]3|/93 ~s - 4 -
without limitation, the "Existing Development Approvals" listed
in Exhibit B which were approved by the City of Temecula.
(g) "Land Use Regulations. means all ordinances,
resolutians, codes, rules, regulations and official policies of
City, governing the development and use of land including without
limitation, the permitted use of land, the density or intensity
of use, subdivision requirements, the maximum height and size of
proposed buildings, the provisions for reservation or dedication
of land for public purposes, and the design, improvement and
construction standards and specifications applicable.to the
development of the Property which are a matter of public record
on the Effective Date of this Agreement. "Land .Use Regulations.
does not include any County or City ordinance, resolution, code,
rule, regulation, or official policy, governing:
(1) The conduct of businesses, professions,
and occupations;
(2) Taxes and assessments;
(3) The control and abatement of nuisances;
(4) The granting of encroachment permits and
the conveyance of right~ and interests which provide for the
use of or the entry upon public property;
(5) The exercise of the power of eminent
domain.
(h) "Senior Citizen Housing Development. means a
multi-family development intended for persons 55 years of age or
older, as further defined at' California Civil Code Section 51.3.
(i) "Subsequent Development Approvals. means all
Development Approvals required subsequent to the Effective Date
in connection.with development of the Property.
(j) "Project" is the development of the Property
with the following specific uses: (i) multifamily senior housing
complex; (ii) congregate care facility; (iii) skilled nursing
facility; (iv) personal care facility, and (v) Seniors' Corfu.unity
Center; and (vi) a nine (9) hole private golf course.
(k) "Owner. means the person having a legal
interest in the Property;
i(1) "Subsequent Land Use Regulation. means any.
Land. Use Regulation adopted and effective.after the Effective
Date of this Agreement.
(m) "Property" is the real property referred to
in Exhibit "A".
2. Interest of Owner. Owner represents that he has a
legal interest in the Property and that all other persons holding
legal or equitable interests in the Property are to be bound by
this Agreement.
3. Exhibits. The following documents are referred to
in this Agreement, attached hereto and made a part hereof by this
reference:
R:'~STAF~iNFIELD.TWO 3/31/93 Ijs - 5 -
Exhibit
Des ignat ion
Description
Legal Description of the
Property
Referred to
in Paragraph
K
B Existing Development 1 (f), 15.2
Approvals
C DevelOpment Schedule .. .- 9, 10
D Public Facility Fee .. 14.2
Agreement
E Fee Credit 14.3
F
Deed Restriction
10
G
Developmept Plan
9
'4. Term. .
(a) The term of this Agreement shall commence on
the Effective Date and shall extend for a period of ten (10)
years thereafter, unless this Agreement is terminated, modified
or extended by circumstances set forth in this Agreement or by
mutual consent of the parties hereto.
(b) Should the Owner: (i) fail to obtain all
Subsequent Development Approvals to develop and complete the
Project, or (ii) breach the Development Schedule, Owner agrees to
City amending the land use designation to Public Institutional,
and amending the zoning to Public Institutional.
(c) Notwithstanding any other provisions of this
Agreement, upon the sale or lease of any lot, dwelling or unit to
a member of the public or other ultimate user, this Agreement
shall terminate with respect to any such lot, dwelling, unit or
space, and such lot, dwelling-, unit..Or space shall be released
and no longer be subject'to this Agreement without the execution
or recordat'ion of any further document upon satisfaction of both
of the'following conditions:
(1) The lot has been finally subdivided and
individually (and not in "bulk") sold or leased to a member
of the public or other ultimate user; and,
(2) A Certificate of Occupancy has been
issued for a building or the lot, and the fees set forth
under Section 14 of this Agreement have been paid.
Notwithstanding the sale of any individual lot,
dwelling, unit or space as set forth herein, the Owner shall
remain liable to perform any and all outstanding obligations,
still unperformed or uncompleted at the time of sale, with
respect to said lot, dwelling, unit or space required by this
Agreement or as a condition of any development approval. The
Owner shall condition the sale and deed sufficiently to ensure
the completion of said obligations.
R:~TAFFRF~Leql~NLD.TV;O 3F31~F3 ~s - 6 -
5. Assignment.
5.1 Right to'Assign. The Owner shall have the
right to.sell, transfer, or assign the Property in whole or in
part (provided that no such partial transfer shall violate the
Subdivision Map Act, Government Code Section 66410, et aL~.~, or
Riverside County Ordinance No. 460, as the same was incorporated
by reference into the Tamecula Municipal Code by Ordinance No.
90-04) to.any person, partnership, joint venture, firm, or
corporation at any time during the term of this Agreement;
provided, however, that any such eale, transfer, or.assignment
shall include. the assignment and assumption of the rights,
duties, and obligations arising under or from this Agreement and
be made in strict compliance with.the following conditions
precedent:
(a) No sale, transfer, or assigrunent of any
right or interest under this Agreement shall be made unless
made.together with the sale, transfer, or assignment of all
or a part of the Property.
(b) Concurrent with any such sale, transfer
or assignment, or within fifteen (15) business days
thereafter, the Owner shall notify City, in writing/of such
sale, transfer, or assignment and shall provide City with an
executed agreement, in a form acceptable to the City
Attorney, by the-purchaser, transferee, or assignee and
providing therein that the purchaser, transferee, or
assignee expressly and unconditionally assumes all the
duties and obligations of the Owner under this Agreement.
Any sale, transfer, or assignment not made in strict
compliance with the foregoing conditions shall constitute a
default by the Owner under this Agreement. Notwithstanding the
failure of any purchaser, transferee, or assignee to' execute the
agreement required by Paragraph (b) of this Subsection, the
burdens of this Agreement shall be binding upon such purchaser,
transferee, or assignee, but the benefits of this Agreement shall
not inure to such purchaser, transferee, or assignee until and
unless such agreement is executed.
5..2 Release of Transferring Owner.
Notwithstanding any sale, transfer, or assignment, a .transferring
Owner shall continue to be obligated under this Agreement unless
such transferring Owner is given a release in writing by City,
which release shall be provided by City upon the full
satisfaction by such transferring Owner of all of the following
conditions:
(a) The Owner no longer has a legal or
equitable interest in all or any part of the Property except
as a beneficiary under a deed of trust.
(b) The Owner is not then in default under
this Agreement.
(c) The Owner has provided. City with the
notice and executed agreement required under Paragraph (b)
of Subsection 5.1 above.
(d) The purchaser, transferee, or assignee
provides City with security equivalent to any security
previously provided by Owner to secure performance of its.
obligations hereunder.
R:~S~STAFF~.TWO 3/31/93 tj, - 7-
5.3 Subsequent Assignment. Any subsequent sale,
transfer, or assignment after an initial sale, transfer, or
assignmen. t shall be made only in accordance with and subject to
the terms and conditions of this Section.
6. Mortgacee Protection. The parties hereto agree
that this Agreement shall not prevent or limit Owner, in any
manner, at 0wner's sole discretion, from encumbering the Property
or any portion thereof or any improvement thereon by any
mortgage, deed of trust, or other security device securing
financing with respect to the Property. City acknowledges that
the lenders providing such financing may'require certain'
Agreement .interpretations and agrees upon .request, from time to
time, to meet with the Owner and representatives of such lenders
to negotiate in good faith any such request for interpretation.
City will not unreasonably withhold its consent to any such
requested interpretation provided such interpretation is
consistent with the intent and purposes of this Agreement. Owner
shall reimburse City for any and all of City's costs associated
with said interpretations and shall make reimbursement payments
to City within thirty (30) days of receipt of an invoice from
City.
Any Mortgagee of the Property shall be entitled to the
following rights and privileges:
.(a) Neither entering into this Agreement nor a
breach of this Agreement shall defeat, render invalid, diminish
or impair the lien of any mortgage on the Property made in good
faith and for value, unless otherwise required by law.
(b) The Mortgagee of any mortgage or deed of
trust encumbering the Property, or any part thereof, which
Mortgagee has Submitted a request in writing to the City in the
manner specified herein for giving notices, shall be entitled to
receive written notification from City of any default by the
Owner in the performance of the Owner's obligations under this
Agreement.
(c) If City timely receives a request from a
Mortgagee requesting a copy of any notice of default given .to the
Owner under the terms of this Agreement,.City shall.provide a
copyof that notice to the Mortgagee within ten.(10) days of
sending the notice of default to the Owner. The Mortgagee shall
have the right, but not the obligation, to cure the default
during the remaining cure period allowed such party under this
Agreement.
(d) Any Mortgagee who comes into possession of
the Property, or any part thereof, pursuant to foreclosure of the
mortgage or deed of trust, or deed in lieu of such foreclosure,
shall take the Property, or part thereof, subject to the terms of
this Agreement. Notwithstanding any other provision of this
Agreement to the contrary, no Mortgagee shall have an obligation
or duty under this Agreement to perform any of the Owner's
obligations or other affirmative covenants of the Owner
hereunder, or to guarantee such performance, provided however,
that to the extent that any covenant to be performed .by Owner is
a condition precedent to the performance of a covenant by City,
the performance thereof shall continue to be a condition
precedent to City's performance hereunder, and further provided
R:~q~STAFFRPT~I./NF1BI..D.TWO 3/31/93 ~js - ~-
that any sale, transfer or assignment by any Mortgagee in
possession shall be subject to the provisions of Section 6.3 of
this Agreement.
" (e) Any Mortgagee who comes into possession of
the Property, or any portion thereof, pursuant to subsection (d)
above and who elects not to assume the obligations of the Owner
set forth herein shall not be entitled to any rights to develop
which have or may have vested as a result of this Agreement.
7. Binding Effect of Agreement. The burdens of this
Agreement bind and the benefits of the Agreement inure to :.the
successors-in~interest to the parties to it.
8. R~lationshi~ of .Parties. It is understood.~hat
the contractual relationship between City and Owner is such that
the Owner is an independent contractor and not the agent of City.
9. Project Zoning. Pursuant to the Existing
Development Approvals, the Project description contained at
Section 16.1 of this Agreement, and the Development Plan, the
Property has been rezoned from Rural-Residential (R-R) to General
Residential (~-3} to permit Project development. The land use
designation under the City's Draft General Plan is Public
Institutional and High Density Residential. The rezoning and
proposed land use designation.is conditional upon the completion
of the Project pursuant to the Development Schedule. Any
substantial breach of .the Existing Development Approvals,
Development Schedule or Development Plan shall constitute a
material breach of the Agreement.
10. Development Schedule.
(a) Owner shall develop the Property pursuant to
the Development Schedule contained in Exhibit C.
(b) Concurrently with recording Parcel Map No.
27314, Owner shall record a deed restriction in substantially the
form of Exhibit F, as to Parcels 1-4 of said Tract, restricting
occupancy in the Project to persons fifty-five (55) years of age
and older.
(c) The parties acknowledge that Owner cannot at
.this time predict when, or the rate at which phases of.the
Property will be developed. Such decisions 'depend upon numerous
factors which are.not within. the .control of Owner, such as market
orientation and demand, interest rates, absorption, completion
and other similar factors. Since the California Supreme Court
held in Pardee Construction Co. v. City of Camarillo, 37 Cal. 3d
465 (1984), that the failure of the parties therein to provide
for the timing of development resulted in a later adopted
initiative restricting the timing of development to prevail over
such parties, agreement, it is the parties, intent to cure that
deficiency by acknowledging and providing that the Owner shall
have the right to develop the Property in such order and at such
rate and at such times as the Owner deems appropriate within the
exercise of its subjective business judgment, subject only to any
timing or phasing requirements set forth in the Development
Schedule.
11. Hold Harmless. Owner agrees to and shall hold
City, its officers, agents, employees and representatives.
harmless
from liability for damage' or claims for damage for
personal injury including death and claims for property damage
R:~TAFFRPT~L/NF~LD.TWO 3~!~ ~s - 9 -
which may arise from the direct or indirect operations of the
Owner or those of his contractor, subcontractor, agent, .employee
or other.person acting on his behalf which relate-to the Project.
Owner agrees to and shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless
the City and its officers, agents, employees and representatives
from actions for damages caused or alleged to have been caused by
reason of 0wner's activities in co~n_ection with the Project.
.This hold harmless agreement applies to all damages and
claims for damages suffered or alleged to have been suffered by
reason of the operations referred to in this paragraph~
regardless of whether or not City prepared, supplied,'or'approved
plans or specifications or both for the Project.and regardless of
whether or not the insurance policies referred to herein are
applicable.
Owner further agrees to indemnify, hold harmless, pay
all costs and provide a defense for City in any action
challenging the validity of this Agreement or the Project.
12. Litigation.
12.1 Third Party Litigation Concerning Agreement.
Owner shall defend, at its expense, including attorneys fees,
indemnify, and hold harmless City, its agents, officers and
employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against City, its
agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void, or
annul the approval of this Agreement or the approval of any
permit granted pursuant to this Agreement. City shall promptly
notify Owner of any such claim, action, or proceeding, and City
shall cooperate in the defense. If City fails to promptly notify
Owner of any such claim, action, or proceeding, or if City fails
to cooperate in the defense, Owner shall not thereafter be
responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless City. City
may in its discretion participate in the defense of any such
claim, action, or proceeding.
12.2 Environmental Assurances. Owner shall
indemnify and hold City, its officers, agents, and employees free
and harmless from any liability, based or asserted, upon any act
or omission of Owner, its officers, agents, employees,
subcontractors, predecessors-in-interest,.successors, assigns' and
independent contractors for any violation of any federal, state,
or local law, ordinance or regulation relating to industrial
hygiene, solid or hazardous waste or to environmental conditions
on, under or about the Property. Said violations shall include,
but not limited to, soil and groundwater conditions, and Owner
shall defend, at its expense, including'attorneys fees, City, its
officers, agents and employees in any action based or asserted
upon any such alleged act or omission. City may, in its
discretion, participate in the defense of any such action.
13. Third Party Litigation Concerning the General
Plan. City is a newly incorporated city falling within the scope
of Government Code Sections 65360 and 65311 and thus not subject
to the requirement that a General Plan be adopted or that
development decisions be consistent therewith so long as the City
makes certain findings, which the City has made at Section J. of
this Agreement. Notwithstanding these findings City shall have
no liability in damages under this Agreement for any failure of
City to perform under this Agreement or the inability of Owner to
R:XS'~STAFFRPTXLINF~J,D.TWO 3/31/93 tjs - 10 -
develop the Property as contemplated by the Development Plan of
this Agreement as the result of a judicial determination that on
the Effegtive Date, or at any time thereafter, the findings made
under Section 65360 and 65361 or the future General Plan, are
invalidated or inadequate or not in compliance with law.
14. Public Benefits. Public Improvements and
Facilities.
14.1 Intent. The parties acknowledge 'and agree
that development of the Property will result in substantial
public needs which will not be fully met by development of the
Project and further acknowledge'and agree that this Agreement
confers substantial private benefits on the Owner which should be
balanced by commensurate public Denefits. Accordingly, the
parties intend to provide consideration to the public to balance
the private benefits conferred on the Owner by providing more
fully for the satisfaction of the public needs resulting from the
Project.
14.2 Impact Fees.
(a) The developer(s) of the Property shall pay a
capital or impact fee for road improvements and public facilities
the City may adopt for development ("Public Facilities Fee"), in
the amount in effect at the time of payment of the fee. (The
term "developer(s) of the Property or Project. as .used in this
Section shall mean the person(s) who seeks a building permit to
construct structures on the.Property. These individuals shall
hereinafter be referred to as the "Developer..) If an interim or
final public facility mitigation fee or benefit district has not
been finally established by the date on which Developer requests
its building permits for the Project or any phase thereof, the
Developer shall execute an Agreement for Payment of a Public
Facility Fee, in substantially the form of Exhibit D.
(b) Owner shall pay all other impact fees
provided for under the Land Use Regulations, including, but not
limited to the Residential Impact Fee (pursuant to Riverside
County Ordinance No. 659) and Flood Control, Fire, Library,
Traffic Mitigation and K-Rat Fees.
1.4.3 Fee Credits and 'Schedule. In exchange for'
the dedication of land, the construction of"improvements and the
payment of fees, Owner shall be entitled to Fee Credits set forth
in Exhibit E.
14.4 Waiver. By execution of this Agreement,
Owner waives any right to object to the imposition of the
provisions of Section 15 of this Agreement, the adoption of any
interim or final Public Facility Fee, or the process, levy, or
collection of any interim or final Public Facility Fee for this
Project; provided that Owner is. not waiving its right to protest
the reasonableness of any interim or final Public Facility Fe~,
and the amount thereof.
15. Reservations of Authority.
15.1 Limitations, Reservations, and Exceptions.
Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, the
following Subsequent Land Use Regulations shall apply to the
development of the Property, including, but not limited to:
R:\S~STAFFRFI'~INF~I D.TWO ~lfJllg'J tjs - 11 -
(a) Processing fees and charges imposed by
City to cover the estimated actual costs to City of
progessing applications for Development Approvals or for
monitoring compliance with any Development Approvals granted
or issued.
(b) Procedural regulations relating to
hearing bodies, petitions, applications, notices, findings,
records, hearings, reports, recou~endation, appeals, and any
other matter of procedure.
· (c) Regulations'governing construction
standards and.specifications including, without limitation~
the City's Building Code, Plumbing Code, Mechanical Code,
Electrical Code, Grading Code and Fire Code.
(d) Subsequent Land Use Regulations which
are not in conflict with the Project.
15.2 Subsequent Development Approvals. This
Agreement shall not prevent City, in acting on Subsequent
Development Approvals from applying Subsequent Land Use
Regulations, even if they conflict with the Existing Land Use
Regulations, Existing Development Approvals or the Development
Plan. Further, this Agreement shall not prevent City from denying
'or conditionally approving any Subsequent Development Approval on
the basis of the Existing or Subsequent Land Use Regulations.
15.3 MOdification or Suspension by State or
Federal Law. In the event that State or Federal laws or
regulations enacted after the Effective Date of this Agreement
prevent or preclude compliance with one or more of the provisions
of this Agreement, such provisions of this Agreement shall be
modified or suspended as may be necessary to comply with such
State or Federal laws or regulations, provided, however, that
this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect to the
extent it is not inconsistent with such laws or regulations and
to the extent such laws or regulations do not render such
remaining provisions impractical to enforce.
15.4 Regulation by Other Public Agencies. It is
acknowledged by the parties that other public agencies not within
the control of City. possess authority to regulate aspects of the
development of the Property separately from or jointly with City
and this Agreement does not'limit the authority of such other
public agencies.
15.5 Vesting Tentative Maps. If any tentative or
final subdivision map, or tentative or final parcel map,
heretofore or hereafter approved in connection with development
of the Property, is a vesting map under the Subdivision Map Act
(Government Code Section 66410, et sea.) and Riverside County
Ordinance No. 460, as the same was in6orporated by reference into
the Temecula Municipal Code by Ordinance No. 90-04, and if this
Agreement is determined by a final judgment to be invalid or
unenforceable insofar as it grants a vested right to develop to
the Owner, then and to that extent the'rights, obligations, and
protections afforded the Owner and City respectively, under the
laws and ordinances applicable to vesting maps shall supersede
the provisions of this Agreement. Except as set forth
immediately above, development of the Property shall occur only
as provided in this Agreement,' and the provisions in this
R:~AFFRFP~F, LD.TWO 3~1~ Os - 12 -
Agreement shall be controlling over any conflicting provision of
law or ordinance concerning vesting maps.
16. Development of the Property.
-. 16.1 Project. The Property shall be developed
with the following uses, and only the following uses:
(a) Senior Citizen Housing Development on
Parcel 2 of Parcel Map 27314, up to 20.dwelling units per
net acre with a'target density of 10 'dwelling units per
acre;
(b) Nine (9) hole private golf.course for
the sole use of'private residents on Parcel 2 of 'Parcel Map
27314;
(c) senior's Co~Lunity center with a minimum
of 3,500 square feet on Parcel I of the Parcel Map 27314;
(d) Congregate Care Facility on Parcel 3 of
Parcel Map-27314; and
(e) Skilled Nursing and Personal Care
Faciiities.on Parcel 4 of Parcel Map 27314.
No change, modification, revision or alteration of
these uses or of the Project may be made without the prior
amendment of this Agreement.
16.2 RiGhts tO Develop. The permitted uses of the
Property, the density and intensity of use, the maximum height
and size of proposed buildings, and provisions for reservation
and dedication of land for public purposes shall be those set
forth in Section 16.1 and the Development Plan. The Project
shall remain subject to all Subsequent Development Approvals
required to complete the Project as contemplated by the
Development Plan.
16.3 Changes and Amendments. Notwithstanding
Section 16.1, the parties acknowledge that refinement and further
development of the Project will require Subsequent Development
Approvals and may demonstrate that changes are appropriate and
mutually desirable in the Project. In the event the Owner finds
that a change in the Project is necessary or appropriate, the
Owner shall apply for a Subsequent Development Approval to
effectuate such change and. City shall process and act on such
application in accordance with' the Subsequent. Land Use
Regulations. If approved, any such change in the Project shall
be incorporated herein as an addendum to this Agreement and may
be further changed from time to time as provided in this Section.
Unless otherwise required by law, as determined in City's
reasonable discretion, a change to the Project shall be deemed
"minor,, and not require an amendment to this Agreement provided
such change does not:
(a) Alter the permitted uses of the Project
as a whole; or,
(b) Increase the density or intensity of use
of the Project as a whole; or,
(c) Increase the maximum height and size of
permitted buildings; or,
(d)- Delete a requirement for the reservation
or dedication of land for public purposes within the Project
as a whole; or,
R:~S~STAF~.TWO 3/31/93 lie -13-
(e) Constitute a project requiring a
Subsequent or Supplemental Environmental Impact Report
purs. uant to Section 21166 of the Public Resources COde.
17. Periodic Review of Compl.~ance with Agreement.
(a) Pursuant to City Resolution No. 91-52, as it
.may be subsequently amended, City shall review this Agreement at
least once during every twelve (12) month period from. the date
this Agreement is execu=ed. The Owner or successor shall
reimburse City for the actual and necessary costs of this review.
(b) During each periodic reviewby City,-the
Owner is required to demonstrate good faith compliance'with the
terms of the Agreement. The Owner agrees to furnish such
evidence of good faith compliance as City in the exercise of its
discretion may require.-
18. Amendment or Cancellation of Agreement. This.
Agreement may be amended or canceled in whole or in part only by
mutual consent of the parties and in the manner.provided for in
Government Code Sections 65868, 65867 and 65867.5. If the
Amendment is requested by the Owner or successor, the
Owner/successor agrees to pay City any Development Agreement
Amendment fee then in existence as established by City Council
Resolution, or if no such fee is established, to reimburse City
for the actual and necessary costs of reviewing and processing
said Amendment.
19. Breach of Agreement.
(a) The City reserves the right to terminate this
Agreement in the event of a material breach of any of its
material terms or any material term of any applicable federal,
state or local statute or regulation, which breach is not cured
following written notice and a reasonable opportunity to cure.
In finding such a breach:
(i) City does not waive any claim of defect
in performance by Owne~ implied if on periodic review the City
does not propose to modify or terminate the Agreement.
(ii) Non-performance shall not be excused
because of a failure of a .third person;. and
(iii)'Non-performance shall be excused only
when it is prevented or delayed by acts of God or an emergency
declared by the Governor.
(b) The notice to cure period shall be thirty
(30) days (except in cases of emergency where a shorter time may
be prescribed consistent with the nature of the emergency).
Where thirty (30) days is insufficient time for the Owner to cure
the notified breach, Owner shall be deemed in compliance with the
provisions if, within that thirty-day time period Owner begins
good faith efforts to cure such breach and shall present a
specific and reasonable timetable to the City for the cure of the
notified breach. If the breach is not cured within such time
period or within such additional time period specified in such
notice, the Planning Director shall cause to be noticed a public
hearing before the City Council.
(c) The Council shall hold a public hearing, upon
ten (10) days written notice duly given to Owner and published
notice provided to the public. Owner may appear at the public
hearing before the Council and present information, orally or in
R:~\~A~n:ID.TWO 3/31~ ~s - 14 -
documented form, that it ~eems relevant and appropriate to the
Council's deliberations. Based on the evidence presented at the
public h~aring, the Council shall determine by resolution whether
the Agreement should be terminated. Nothing herein is intended
to limit Councilis right to make other determinations which are
reasonably related to the Agreement.
(d) The City Council'shall cause Owner to receive
written notice of any action taken following the public hearing.
(e) Within not less than thirty (30) days of
receiving notice of the Ckty Council~s action, Owner shall be
entitled to initiate an action in state court to seek judicial
review pursuant to California. Code of'Civil. Procedure Section
1094.5. In the event Owner initiates such a review, the
Council's determination shall be stayed pending a final order of
the court.
(f) Upon a finding of material breach of this
'Agreement, and the failure of Owner to successfully challenge the
same in a court of law, City may not only terminate this
Agreement, but also shall amend the land use designation of the
Property to Public Institutional and amend the zoning to Public
Institutional; Owner further agrees to such amendments..
(g) All other remedies at law or in equity which
are not otherwise provided for in the Agreement or in City's
regulations governing development agreements are available to the
parties to pursue in the event there is a breach.
20. Damages Upon Termination. It is acknowledged by
the parties that City would not have entered into this Agreement
if it were to be liable in damages under or with respect to this
Agreement or the application thereof.
In general, each of the parties hereto may pursue
any remedy at law or equity available for the breach of any
provision of this Agreement, except that City, and its officers,
employees and agents, shall not be liable in damages to Owner or
to any assignee, transferee of Owner, or any other person, and
Owner covenants not to sue for or claim any damages for breach of
that Agreement by City. - ;
21. Attorneys' Fees and Costs. If legal action by
either party is brought because of breach of this Agreement or to
enforce a provision of this Agreement, the prevailing party is
entitled to reasonable attorneys fees and court costs.
22. Notices. All notices required or provided for
under this Agreement shall be in writing and delivered in person
or sent by certified mail, postage prepaid. Notice required to
be given to City shall be addressed as follows:
To City: City Clerk
City of Temecula
43172 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92390
R:~S~%'TA~!NFIBLD.TWO 3/31/93 lj, ' 15 -
Notices required to be given to Owner shall be addressed as
follows:
.To Owner:
A party may chan~e the address by givin~ notice in writing to 'the
other party and thereafter notices shall be addressed and.
t~ansmitted to the new address.
23. Rules of Construction and Miscellaneous Terms.
(a) The singular'includes the plural; the
masculine gender includes the feminine; "shall" is mandatory,
."may" is permissive.
(b) If a part of this'Agreement is held to be
invalid, the remainder of the Agreement is not affected.
(c) If there is more than one signer of this
Agreement their obligations are joint and several.
(d) The time limits set forth in this Agreement
-may be extended by mutual written consent of the parties in
accordance with the procedures for adoption of the Agreement.
(e) This Agreement is made and entered into for.
the sole protection and benefit of the parties and their
successors and assigns. No other person, including but not
limited to third party beneficiaries, shall have any right of
action based upon any provision of this Agreement.
(f) This Agreement may be executed by the parties
in counterparts, each of which so fully executed counterpart
shall be deemed an original irrespective of the date of
execution.
24. .Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in
any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an
original, but all of which when.taken together shall constitute
one and the same instrument. '
IN WITNESS WHEREOF this Agreement has been executed by
the parties on the day and year first above written.
"CITY,
Attest:
By:
MAYOR
City Clerk
R:\S~TAFFRY~L~rF~,LD.TWO 3/31;93 ~s - 16 -
Approved as to form:
City Attorney
By.:
Name:
Title:
By:
Name:
Title:
Notary
[ALL SIGNATURES.SHALL BE ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE A NOTARY PUBLIC.
EXECUTION ON BEHALF OF ANY CORPORATION SHALL BE BY TWO CORPORATE
OFFICERS.]
R:~TAFFRPT~.INI~r ~.T~/O 3/31/9~J Ijs - 17 -
DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPEaTY
BEING A PORTION OF THE P, ANCHO TEMECUI~, AS GRANTED BY U.S. GOV'T
TO LUIS VIGNES BY PATENT DATED 1-18-1860, AS SHOWN BY LIBER 1
PAGE 37, REC'S OF SAN. DIEGO CO., AN PARCELS 1,2,3.'0F P.M. 83/97-
100 REC'S RIVERSIDE CO. 'LOCATED IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, .'
CALIFORNIA.
R:~S~-qTAFFRPT~INFIBLD.TWO 3/'31/93 tjs
EXHIBIT wBn
EXISTING DEV~T.OpMENT APPROVALS
Tentative Parcel Map No. 27314
Change 0f Zone No. 21
R:~S~STA~-TWO 3/31/~3 !is - 19 -
EXHIBIT ace
Dx'VELO~ SCHEDULE
Within five (5) years of the effective date of this
-Development A~reement, Owner shall have substantially
begun construction of each of the following uses:
Twenty (20) dwelling unitS' of the Senior Citizen
Housing Development, and
The Congregate Care Facility, Skilled Nursing
Facility, or Personal Care Facility
"Substantially begun construction. shall mean obtaining
a building permit and having an approved and inspected
foundation.
Prior to the issuance of the certificate of occupancy
for the first unit of the multi-family senior housing
complex, Owner shall have constructed and obtained a
certificate of occupancy for the Senior Citizen Center,
and shall have completed the Golf Course·
"Completed the Golf Course" shall mean construction and
completion of all structures, six months growth of the
grass and certification of the course by a Licensed
Landscape Architect.
Within five (5) years of the effective date of this
Development ~greement, Owner shall have recorded Parcel
Map 27314 and have obtained all Subsequent Development
Approvals for the Senior Citizen Housing Development,
the Congregate Care Facility, the Skilled Nursing
Facility, the Personal Care Facility, and the Golf
Course.
Within the term of this Development Agreement, Owner
shall have obtained certificates of occupancy for all
buildings identified in the Subsequent Development
Approvals. '
R:~S%STAFFRPT~LINIm~w D.TV;O 3/31/93 Ijs - 2 0 -
PUBLIC FACILITY F~ AGREEMENT
R:~S~STAFFRFr%LINFIELD.T~/O 3/31/93 tjs - 2 1 -
E21~Z3T?
Upon obtaining a certificate of occupancy Owner shall
.dedicate to the City the Senior Citizen Center
described in Exhibit C. In exchange for dedication of
the Senior Citizen Center and completion of the Golf
Course, Owner shall receive a 'full credit against its
Quimby Fees'required pursuant to. Riverside County
Ordinance No. 460.
R:~S\STAFFRPT~L~.TWO 3/31/93
EXHIBIT eFs
DERD RESTRICTTON
RECORDING REQUESTED BY:
WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
CI.TY CLERK
CITY OF TEMECULA
43174 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA 92590
DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIONS
This DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIONS made this
, 1992, by (.
hereinafter referred to as "Declarant..
.)
day of
WHEREAS, Declarant is the owner of Parcels 1-4 of Parcel Map
No. 27314 (the "'Property.); and
WHEREAS, Declarant intends to sell the .above described
property,' restricting it in accordance with a common plan
designed to preserve the value and residential qualities of said
land, for the benefit of its future owners.
NOW, THESEFORE, Declarant declares that said real property
shall be held, transferred, encumbered, used, sold, conveyed,
leased, and occupied, subject to the covenants and restrictions
hereinafter set forth expressly and exclusively for the use and
benefit of said property and of each and every person or entity
who now or in the future owns any portion or portions of said
real property..
1. Land Use and Buildin~ Type.. No person may occupy
any dwelling'unit located on the Property'unless he or she is at
least fifty-five (55) years of age, or otherwise qualifies for
residency pursuant to California Civil Code Section 51.3.
2. T~rm. These covenants are to run with the land
and shall be binding on all parties and all persons claiming
under them for a. period of thirty (30) years from the date these
covenants are recorded, after which time said covenants shall be
automatically extended for successive periods of ten (10) years
unless an instrument signed by a majority of the then owners of
the lots, and the City of Temecula, has been recorded, agreeing
to change said covenants in whole or in part.
3. Enforcement. Enforcement shall be by proceedings
at law or in equity against any person or persons violating or
attemptingto violate any'covenant either to restrain violation
R:\S\STAFFRPT~M]qILD.TWO 3F31~3 ~, - 23 -
or to recover damages. The City of Temecula may enforce any
covenant of this Declaration.
4. Attorneys Fees. Should any party bring an action
against the other for the' purpose of enforcing the terms of this
Stipulation, or for damages arising from its breach, then in such
event, the prevailing party shall be entitled to its reasonable
attorneys fees and costs in addition to any other award entered
by the Court.
5. Severability. Inva~idation.of any'one of these.
covenants by 'judgment or court order shall in no wise.. affect any
of the other provisions which shall remain in full force and
effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Declarant has executed this Declaration
of restrictions.the day and year first above written.
DECLARANT:
Signature
Name:
Address:
R:~TrAFFRF~L~FIBLD.TWO 3/31/93 ~s - 24 -
DEVELOPMENT PLAN
R:~S~STAFFILDT~LINFIE~D.TWO 3/31/93 ~js - 25-
ATTACHMENT NO. 4
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, MARCH 1, 1993
R:%S~STAFFRF'r~7314.PC2 3/31/93 tie 27
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
MARCH 1, 1993
A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Planning Commission was called to order Monday,
March 1, 1993, at 6:00 P.M., Vail Elementary School, 29915 Mira Loma Drive, Temecula,
California. The meeting was called to order by Vice Chairman Billie Blair.
PRESENT: 3 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Chiniaeff, Hoagland'
ABSENT: 2 COMMISSIONERS: Ford, Fahey
Also present were Assistant City Attorney John Cavanaugh, Senior Planner Debbie Ubnoske,
Senior Planner John Meyer and Minute Clerk Gall Zigler.
PUBLIC COMMENT
None
COMMISSION BUSINESS
1. Approval of Aaenda
It was moved by Commissioner Chiniaeff, seconded by Commissioner Hoagland to
approve the agenda.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 3
NOES: '.0
ABSENT: 2
COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Chiniaeff, Hoagland
COMMISSIONERS: None
COMMISSIONERS:' Ford, Fahey
PUBLIC HEARING
2. Chanae of Zone No. 23
Proposed zone change for a 6.1 acre parcel from R-3-4,000 to C-O. Located o.n the
south side of Rancho California Road, approximately 450 feet east of the intersection
of Via Las Colinas and Rancho California Road.
Matthew Fagan presented the staff report.
,~ PCMIN03101193 -1- 3/10/93
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES MARCH 1, 1993
.Com. missioner Hoagland asked if the applicant has a plot plan.
Safa Muhtaseb, 39930 Whitewood Road, Unit 106, Murrieta, owner and applicant,
stated that he is working on the zone change at this time and when completed, the
project will proceed to the engineering stage.
It was moved by Commissioner Chiniaeff, .seconded by Commissioner Hoagland to
close the public hearing .at 6:20 P.M. and Recommend Adoption of the Negative
Declaration for Change of Zone No. 23 and Recommend Adoption of Resolution No.
PC 93-04 recommending Approval of Change of Zone No. 23.
The motion carried as fol'lows:
AYES:
3 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Chiniaeff, Hoagland
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: 2 COMMISSIONERS: Ford, Fahey
Outdoor Advertisina Disolav Ordinance
Matthew Fagan presented the staff report.
Commissioner Chiniaeff questioned why the provisions dealing with hardship cases
were eliminated.
Assistant City 'Attorney John Cavanaugh: advised that because it is difficult to
determine what a hardship is, it leaves an opportunity for anyone to declare a hardship,
therefore the City Attorney recommends deleting the hardship clause.
Vice Chairman Blair opened the'public hea'ring at 6:25 P.M.
Commissioner Chiniaeff questioned if there is a "sunset"' clause on non-conforming
signs.
Assistant City Attorney Cavanaugh advised that non-conformity creates an issue
where if the City required non-conforming signs to come down, the City would have
to compensate the owner.
It was moved by Commissioner Hoagland, seconded by Commissioner Chiniaeff to
close the public hearing at 6:25 P.M. and Adoot Resolution No. PC 93-05
recommending the City Council adopt the Ordinance No. 93 - (next) relative to outdoor
advertising displays and deletion of language in Section 4(A) dealing with hardship
CeSBS.
PCMIN03101/93 -2- 3/10193 ~
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES -MARCH 1, 1993
The.motion carried as follows:
AYES:
3 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Chiniaeff, Hoagland
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
· ABSEN:!': 2
COMMISSIONERS:
Ford, Fahey
Amendments to the Ordinance Reaulatino TemDora'rv Sians
Dave Hogan presented the staff report.
commissioner' Chiniaeff suggested the following modifications: 1) Item 4, Page 1.5, be
modified with .a clearer definition of special events; 2) Old Town issues should be in
conformance with the Old Town Specific Plan; and 3) Page 16, E(1) should provide
examples of. hardship cases.
Dave Hogan advised that the 'Old Town section will be superseded by the Old Town
Specific Plan when it is adopted.
Assistant City Attorney Cavanaugh advised that hardship cases will be evaluated by
staff.
Vice Chairman Blair opened the public hearing at 6:35 P.M.
Commissioner Hoagland said that he feels that none of the recommended changes
should be made. He added that he feels a proliferation and/or continued proliferation
of temporary signs takes away from the aesthetic appearance of the community and
274 days a year for allowable signage is excessive. Commissioner Hoagland
suggested leaving the ordinance as is until the comprehensive sign ordinance is
adopted. Commissioner Chiniaeff and Vice Chairman. Blair Concurred.
It was moved by Commissioner Hoagland, seconded by commissioner Chiniaeff to
close the public hearing at 6:45 P.M. and recommend Dqniel of Resolution No. PC 93-
06recommending that the City Council amend portions of Ordinance No. 348 and 92-
16 pertaining to the regulation of temporary signs.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES:
3 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Chiniaeff, Hoagland
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: 2 COMMISSIONERS: Ford, Fahey
~ PCMIN03/01/93 -3- 3/10/93
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
· MARCH 1. 1993
Develooment Aoreement No. 92-1 {DA 92-1) Chanoe of Zone No. ~1 and Tentative
Parcel MaD No. 27314
A request to subdivide a 96.7 acre parcel into 4 parcels and a 48.4 acre remainder
parcel, a Development Agreement to ensure the development of the project as senior
housing, congregate care'facility, skilled nursing, personal care, a nine hole private golf
course and dedication of a 2.3 net acre parcel to the City of Temecula, and a Zone
Change from R-R (Rural Residential) to R-3 (General Residential). 'Linfield Christian
School.
Vice Chairman Blair stepped down due to a conflict of interest based on the close
proximity of her personal residence with the proposed project.
Commissioner Chiniaeff suggested continuing this item until all Commission members
are present.
Commissioner Hoagland opened the public hearing at 6:50 P.M.
Roger D. Prend, 3788 McCray Street, Riverside, representing the applicant, agreed to
continue the item for one month.
Carmine A. Latrecchia, 31533 Corte Pacheco, TemecLila, expressed concern that the
access road, exits and enters off of Rancho Vista Road, which carries a high volume
of traffic traveling at high rates of speed. Mr. Latrecchia asked for consideration with
regards to the lighting of the sports fields, which will have a significant 'impact on his
personal residence. Additionally, Mr. Latrecchia asked that the project provide
adequate parking for special events.
It was moved by Commissioner Chiniaeff, seconded by Commissioner Hoagland to
continue the public hearing on Development Agreement No. 92-1 (DA 92-1 ) Change
of Zone No. 21 and Tentative Parcel Map No. 27314 to the meeting of April 5, 1993.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES:
2 COMMISSIONERS: Chiniaeff, Hoagland
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSTAIN: 1 COMMISSIONERS: Blair
ABSENT: 2 COMMISSIONERS: Ford, Fahey
PLANNING DIRECTOR REPORT
None
PCMIN03101/93 ,$, 3/10~93 '
PLANNING .COMMISSION MINUTES
PLANNING-COMMISSION REPORT
None
MARCH 1.1993
OTHER BUSINESS
None
ADJOURNMENT
Vice Chairman Blair declared the meeting adjourned at 7:00 P.M.
The next regular meeting of the City of Temecula Planning Commission will be Monday, April
5, 1993, 6:00 P.M., Vail Elementary School, 29915 Mira Loma Drive, Temecula, California.
Chairman Linda Fahey
Secretary
~ PCMIN03101193 -S- 3/10193
ATTACHMENT NO. 5
MEMORANDUM TO PLANNING COMMISSION, MARCH 1, 1993
R:~S%STAF'FRPT~Ta14.pC2 3/31/93 t~ 28
TO:
FROM:
PREPAI~rr'~ BY:
DATE:
SUB.~CT:
lV~11ORANDUM
Planning Commi,~sion -
Gary Thornbin, Dire~r of Planning
Saied Naaseh, Associate Planner
March 1, 199t
PA92-0001, Change of Zone No. 21, Tentative Parcel Map No. 27314, .
Amendment No. 3 - Linfield School
Staff recommends the following amendment to the Development Agreement:
.Page 6, Section 4.b.
Co) Should the owner: (i) fail to obtain all Subsequent Development Approvals to
develop and complete the Proje~'t, or (ii) breach the Development Schedule, Owner agrees to
City amending the land use designation to Low Modium Density Ilmaidontinl or Public
Institutional, and amending the zoning to Singlc Ftraily Rcsidential (R I) Public Institutional.
Page 15, Section 19.f
(f)' Upon a finding of material breach of this Agreement, and the failure of Owner to
successfully challenge the same in a court of law, City may not only terminate this Agreement,
but also shall amend the land use designation of the Property to Public Institutional or Low
Medium Density Residential and amend the zoning to Single r~rafly Residential (R 1) Public
Institutional; Owner further agrees to such amendments.
Furthermore, staff recommends the following amendments to the Conditions of Approval:
Replace the word "Traffic" with 'Civil" in Condition No(s) 35, 40, 63, 71 and
73.
o Replace the word "grade" with "grading" in Condition No. 52.
Condition No. 44 shall read as follows:
Plans for a traffic signal shall be recommended by a registered Traffic Engineer
and shall be signed by a registered Civil Engineer and appmved by the
Department of Public Works for the intersection of Pauba Road and Margarita
Road and shall be included in the street improvement plans with the Second plan
check submittal.
R:~SIS'fAFFRPT'dPA~2.R~:lVl 311/93 tj$
ATTACHMENT NO. 6
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT, MARCH 1, 1993
R:%,S'~STAFFRPT'~273"I4.pC2 a/31/93 ti~ 29
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Planning Commission
Gary.Thornhill, Director of Planning ~
March 1, 1993
Development Agreement No. 92-1, Change of Zone No. 21, Tentative
Parcel Map No. 27314, Amendment No. 3; Linfield School
Prepared by:
Saied Naase.h, Associate Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
RECOMMEND Adoption of Negative Declaration for Development
Agreement No. 92-1, Change of Zone No. 21 and Tentative
Parcel Map No. 27314, Amendment No. 3; and
ADOPT Resolution No. 93- 'recommending Approval for
Development Agreement No, 92-1, Change of Zone No. 21,
Tentative Parcel Map No. 27314, Amendment No. 3 based on
the Analysis and Findings contained in the Staff Report and
subject to the attached Conditions of Approval and subject to the
City Council action on changing the land use designation of
Parcel No. 2 from Public Institutional to High Density Residential
prior to adoption of-the General Plan.
BACKGROUND
This project was reviewed and continued off calendar by. Planning Commission on August 17,
1992. Staff was directed to work with the applicant on a' number of issues raised by the
Commission. These issues included changes to the Development Agreement language,
existing trees on site, the golf course, noise and light impacts from the Linfield School
Stadium, access and traffic, future plans for the Linfield School site and grading. Staff and
the applicant have been working together to address all the issues and concerns raised by the
Planning Commission. The following table includes these issues and explains how they have
been addressed:
R:~S~STAFFRPT~7314.1~C 2/24/93 Idb ]
Development Density 20 dwelling units per acre or 240 units. Text has been modified to include up to 20 dwell(nil
Agreement Needs to be consistent.
Page 3, Environmental Findings 1, 2 and 3 are
conflicting {refer to the August 17, 1992 Staff
Report, 'Attachment No. 6).
SeniOr Center size and dollar amount to be spend
needs to be specified.
units per acre with a target density of 10 dwelling
units per acre. Refer to page 13, Section 16.1 .a.
No change has been proposed. Findings No. 1 and 2
refer to this approval. Finding No. 3 refers to future
approvals.
Te.~ has been modified on page 13, Section 16.1.c
and Exhibit G of the Development Agreement has
· been modified. to require a minimum of 3,500 square
feet for the Senior Center.
Specimen
Trees
Senior Center and golf course completion needs to
be up front.
Page 12,#9 - the General Plan Land Use' Designation
"will likely be high density" which was unknown at
the time the project was heard by the Planning
Commission {refer to the August 17, 1992 Staff
Report, Attachment No. 6).
Specify building heights and sizes.
Page 10,#6 - Specify that changes shall not' include
elimination or a reduction in size of the Senior
Center, elimination 'of'the nine (9) hole golf course
and increase in the number of dwelling units or
density {refer to the August 17, 1992 Staff Report,
Attachment No. 6).
Show all existing trees on the landscape plans and
identify a replacement ratio if the trees have to be
removed to accommodate development
The dollar amount has not been specified consistent
with the Community Services Department policy.
No change has been proposed (refer to Exhibit C of
the Development Agreement).
The General Plan Land Use Designation
recommended by Planning Commission to City
Council is Public Institutional for the entire project
site. Staff has amended the recommendation for
this project to include a Commission
recommendation to the City Council for an
amendment to the land use designation of Parcel No.
2 of Tentative Parcel Map No. 27314 to high density
reaidentlal. The rest of the parcels and the proposed
uses of Senior Center, congregate facility and
nursing and personal care facility will be consistent
with the Public Institutional land use designation.
No change has been proposed to the text, since the
Zoning Districts will specify the building heights for
the project. Building sizes will be dictated by the
future development proposals.
The text has been modified te eliminate
modifications to the Development Agreement.
Since the site plans and the landscape plans are
conceptual, the existing trees have not been
identified on the plans; However, Condition No.
17.A.3.h. has been added that requires future
development applications (plot plans, conditional use
permits, etc.) to show the existing trees on the
landscape plans and if their removal is necessary
replacement will be on a 5:1 ratio.
R:~LSTAFFRFI'~97314.1n~ 2/24/93 klb 2
Issue
~ Course
Age
Restrictions
Access/
Traffic
Relocation of
Structures
and Features
Description of the Issue
Specify whether it is a private golf course intended
for the ijse of the project residents or is it intended
to be a private golf course to be used by the public,
Does the fact that this is a private goff course and it
will be used only by the project residents change
the Quimby fee requirements? '
Will parking be provided for the goff course? '
Structures within the golf course need to be
identified on the site plan.
Need to define when the golf course is considered
complete.
No Quimby fees or equivalent are paid until 59
units, congregate, personal and nursing facilities
have been built.
Impacts of the stadium need to be evaluated (i.e.
noise and light)..
The age restriction needs to be clarified in terms of
the qualifier.
Need reciprocal access easements for Parcels 2, 3
and 4 until they are built to provide access to the
school site.
Need to place more restrictions on the access
points shown on the map (i.e. right rum only).
Are there any plans that indicate where the gym
and the ball fields will be moved to?
The lake is being split by a parcel line. What is
going to happen to it?
· Proposed Solution to
:Relolve ~he .Issue
The golf course is intended to be private and be
used by residents of the project {refer to Page No.
13 Section 16.1 .b, of the Development Agreement),
No, Either way the golf course will satisfy a portion
of the Quimby requirements.
No. The conceptual site plan 'does not provide
pa~jng for the golf course, since it is intended for
private use only~
Since the site plan is conceptual, the number and
location of the structures are not known. The future.
development applications will include the details of
the development (including these structures).
The Development Agreement text has been modified
to define the completion of the goff course as
construction and completion of all structures, six
months growth of the grass and certification of the
course by a licensed landscape architect {refer to
Exhibit C of the Development Agreement).
No change is proposed since there is no nexus
between'the congregate care, personal care and
nursing facility and the Quimby fees.
A noise study and light impact analysis will be
conducted prior to approval of a plot plan for the
multi-family senior complex to mitigate the impacts
to insignificant levels (refer to Conditions 9.A. and
9.B.).
The deed restriction (Exhibit F of the Development
Agreement Section 1 ) is consistent with state law.
Condition No. 86.E.2. has' been added .to resolve this
concem.
The Traffic Study recommends full movements for
these access points. Furthermore, Ordinance 460
allows full movement for access aisles if they are
more than 330 feet apart. No change has been
proposed.
These facilities will be moved to the existing school
site in the future, which will require further City
approvals (refer to the conceptual school site plan).
The parcel map has been conditioned to construct a
dike within the remainder parcel, which will keep the
lake on the remainder parcel {refer to Condition No.
52).
R:~q~'TA~I4.pC 2/24/93 IrJb 3
Issue
GradinO
Description of the Issue
A grading plan needs to be prepared in order to '
identif~ the impacts to the project.
A' condition needs to be added to restrict mass
grading pdor to a plot plan approval.
Parcel No. 1 contains 25 % slopes. How useable is
this parcel?
Proposed Solution to
: · · Resolve the Issue
.
A conceptual grading plan has been prepared and
included in the packet for Planning Commlasion's
review.
Condition Nos. 48 and. 49 have been added that
require submittal and approval of a mass grading
plan. Furthermore, a grading permit will not be
issued for an individual parcel until a plot plan is
approved for this parcel..
A conceptual grading plan has been prepared which
shows the parcel may be developed as a senior
center. However, refinement will be necessary at
the plot plan stage.
R:~S~STAF~314.1eC 2/24/93 Idb 4
ANALYSIS
Conceotual Site Plan and Desion Issues
It is staff's opinion that all of Planning Commission's concerns have been addressed as
outlined in the Background Section. The proposed conceptual site plan illustrates how the site
may be developed. The ultimate site plan for development of this project may have a different
layout. The conceptual site plan has a number of design deficiencies,' such as improper
circulation for the multi-family complex and "inadequate fire truck turn around for. the Senior
Center site. Howe.~er, each component of this project will receive additional ..reviews by the
City and specific site design issues .will be dealt with at that stage.
Staff has met with Commissioners Fahey and Hoagland to discuss the conceptual site plan.
They both expressed concerns regarding the Conceptual Site Plan and raised specific on site
design issues (i.e. circulation, noise, location of the Senior Center, drainage, etc.). Concurs"
with these concerns and have conditioned the project to address them with future
development proposals.
Draft General Plan Issues
The Draft General Plan has already been reviewed and recommended by Planning Commission
to the City Council with a Public Institutional land use designation for the project site. The
proposed uses such as the congregate care, skilled nursing and personal care and the Senior
Center are all consistent with this designation. However, the age restricted, multi-family
project (Parcel No. 2 of Tentative Parcel Map No.27314, Amendment No. 3) will need to be
designated High Density Residential on the General Plan. Therefore, if the Planning
Commission determines that this project should be recommended to the City Council for
approval, the land use designation of Parcel No. 2 will need to be changed by the City Council
to High Density Residential. Since the Planning Commission already recommended to the City
Council approval of the land use element, with a designation of Public Institutional for Parcel
No. 2, it is now necessary that the Planning Commission recommend concurrently with this
project that the City Council revise the land use element to High Density Residential. In
addition, the City Council will have to take an action on the land use component of the
General Plan prior to approVing this project. It should be noted that the City Council does not
need to wait until formal adoption of the General Plan. to.take action. on this project.
However, in .the event that the City Council adopts the land use element of the General Plan
prior to consideration of this project, an application for a General Plan Amendment will have
to be filed prior to any final action on this project.
Project Density Issues for Parcel No. 2
The project density for the age restricted multi-family is up to 20 dwelling units per net acre
with a target density of 10 dwelling units per net acre. The gross acreage for this parcel is
38 which could result in 760 dwelling units at 20 DU/AC. However, the most likely number
of units for a project of this type would be approximately 380 dwelling units, or a target
density of 10 DU/AC. The Traffic Study mitigation measures are based on 240 dwelling units.
If the future proposals for Parcel No. 2 exceed 240 dwelling units, the Traffic Study will need
to be updated or new studies will be required (refer to Condition No. 54).
R:XSX-~TAFFRF~27314.pC 2/24/93 ir~ " 5
ZONING, DRAFT GENERAL PLAN AND SWAP CONSISTENCY
The proposed project includes a change of zone from R-R to R-3. This change will allow the
developmen~ of the project site .as a senior housing complex as dictated within the
Development Agreement. Staff is supportive of this change of zone, since it will result in a
desirable senior housing project consistent with the surrounding land uses.
Project approval by the Planning Commission is subject to City Council approval of a High
Density Residential designation fbr Parcel No. 2. of Tentative Parcel Map No. 27314,
Amendment No. 3. Once this occurs, the project would be consistent with the Draft General
Plan. The Draft General Plan land use map currently shows the project site as Public
Institutional since it is now one parcel which contains the Linfield School.
The SWAP designation for the project site is Residentialj minimum one acre lot size. The City
of Temecula is supportive of the approval of this project since it will result in a desirable senior
housing project consistent the surrounding land uses.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
An Initial Study was prepared for this project and with the adoption of mitigation measures
which have been included in the Conditions of Approval, all the anticipated impacts have been
reduced to a level of insignificance. Therefore, a Negative Declaration has been prepared and
recommended for adoption.
FINDINGS
Develovment Aereement No. 92-1
1. The City is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of its General Plan.'
e
e
There is a reasonable probability that the project will be consistent with the general
plan proposal presently being considered subject to the City Council approving a High-
Density Residential Designation for Parcel No. 2 of Tentative Parcel Map No. 27314,
Amendment N0.3, since the project will be Compatible with surrounding uses and will
carry out the. policies intended for the General Plan.
There is little or no probability. of substantial detriment to or interference with the
future adopted general plan if the project is ultimately inconsistent with the plan, since
this project will not have a negative impact on the surrounding uses.
The project complies with all other applicable requirements of state law and local
orffinances.
The environmental impacts of the agreement have been reviewed and all measures
deemed feasible to mitigate adverse impacts thereof have been incorporated into the
City approvals for the project.
No other mitigation measures for environmental impacts created by the project, as
presently approved, shall be required for development of the project unless mandated
by laws.
R:~S~STA~I4.pC 2/24/93 k/b 6
The City may, pursuant t0 and in accordance with its rules, regulations, and
ordinances, conduct an environmental review of subsequent discretionary entitlements
for the development of the property or any changes, amendments, or modifications to
the p~operty. The City, as a result of such review, may impose additional measures
(or conditions) on studies to mitigate, as permitted by law, the adverse environmental
impacts of such development entitlement which were not considered or mitigated at
the time of approval of the project.
ChanQe of Zone No. 21
1..
There is a reasonable probability that Change .of Zone No. 21 will be consistent with
the City's future General Ran subject to the City Council approving a High-Density
Residential Designation for Parcel No. 2 of Tentative Parcel Map No. 27314,
Amendment No. 3, which will be completed in a reasonable time and in accordance
with State Law, due to the fact that the future development of the site will be
controlled by a Development Agreement which is consistent with City's policies for the
new General Plan. '
w
o
There is not a likely probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the
future General Plan, if Change of Zone No. 21 is ultimately inconsistent with the plan,
due to fact that the development of the site will be controlled by a Development
Agreement which is consistent with the City's policies for the future General Plan·
The project is compatible with surrounding land uses since this project will not have
negative impacts on the existing school sites to the east and west and the existing and
proposed single-family dwellings to the north and south.
g
The proposal will not have an adverse effect on the environment, since mitigation
measures have been incorporated into the project design to reduce the impacts to a
level of insignificance.
Tentative Parcel MaD No. 27314. Amendment No. 3
There is a reasonable probability tha;t TentatiVe Parcel Map No. 27314, 'Amendment
No. 3 will be consistent with the City's future General Plan subject to City Council
approving a High-Density Residential Designation for Parcel No. 2 of Tentative Parcel
Map No. 27314, Amendment No. 3, which will be completed in a reasonable time and
in accordance with State law. The project, as conditioned, conforms with existing
applicable city zoning ordinances and development standards.
There is not a likely probability of substantial detriment to, or interference with the
City's future General Plan, if the proposed use is ultimately inconsistent with the Plan,
since the future development of the site will be controlled by a Development
Agreement which is consistent with the City's policies for the new General Plan·
The proposed use or action as conditioned complies with State planning and zoning
laws· Reference local Ordinances No. 348,460; and California Governmental Code
Sections 65000-66009 (Planning and Zoning. Law).
R:XSXSTAFFRJrrX27314.PC 2/24/93 klb 7
The project as designed and conditioned will not adversely affect the-public health or
welfare,
The project is compatible with surrounding land uses since the proposal will not have
a negative impact on the existing school sites to the east and west and the existing
and proposed single-family dwellings to the north and south.
The p~oject has acceptabl~ access to dedicated rights-of-way which are open to, and
useable by, vehicular traffic. The project draws access from Pauba Roadand Rancho
Vista Road, improved dedicated City rights-of-way; Project access, as designed and.
conditioned, conforms with applicable City' EngineeFing standards and ordinances.
The project as designed and conditioned will .not adversely affect the built or natural
environment as determined in the Environmental Analysis for this project.
.Said findings are supported by minutes, maps, exhibits and environmental documents
associated with this application and herein incorporated by reference, due to the fact
that they are referenced. in the attached Staff Report, Exhibits, Environmental
Assessment, and Conditions of Approval.
Attachments:
5.
6.
7.
Resolution No. 93- -- Blue Page 9
Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 15
Exhibits - Blue Page 32
A. Site Plan
B. Tentative Parcel Map
Initial Environmental Study - Blue Page 33
Development Agreement - Blue Page 34
Planning Commission Minutes, August 17, 1992 - Blue Page 35
Planning Commission Staff Report, August 17, 1992 - Blue Page 36
R:N3~"TAFFRPI'~/314.pC 2/24/93 klb 8 '
ATTACHMENT NO, 1
PC RESOLUTION NO. 93-'
R:~S~TA~I4.1n~C 2/24/93 idb 9
PC RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF ~ PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECO~ING APPROVAL
OF DEVELO~ AGRE~VIENT NO. 92-1, CHANGE OF
ZONE NO. 21 TO CHANGE ~ ZONING FROM R-R TO
R-3, AND TENTATIVE .PARCEL MAP NO. 27314,
A1Vts~IVt]~T NO. 3 TO SUBDIVIDE .~ 96.9. ACRE
PARCEL INTO FOUR (4) PARCEL~ AND ~, REMAINDER
PARCEl. S~ TO ~ CITY COUNCIL ACTION ON
CHANGING ~ LAND USE DESIGNATION OF PARCEL
NO. 2 OF TENTATIVE PARCEI. MAP NO. 27314,
~MENT NO. 3 FROM PUBLIC INSliTull ONAL TO
HIGH-DENSITY RESIDENII4L LOCATED NORTH OF
PAUBA ROAD, SOUTH OF RANClIO VISTA ROAD AND
EAST OF ~ ~ VALLEY mGH SCHOOL.
Wig. hi?AS, The Linfield School fled Development Agreement No. 92-i, Change of
Zone No. 21 and Parcel Map No. 27314, Amendment No. 3 in accordance with the Riverside
County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted
by reference;
WHERE,, said applications were proces~ in the time and manner prescribed by State
and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered said applications on March 1, 1993,
at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify 'either in support or opposition;
W!~-I~F. AS at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, the Commission
recommended approval of said applications; ...
Now,' THEREFORE, Tiff, PLANN G' COMMmS ON OF crrY oF
TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Findings. That the Temecula Planning Commission hereby makes the
following findings:
A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly incorporated city shall
adopt a general plan within thirty (30) months following incorporation. During that 30-month
period of time, the city is not subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or the
requirements of state law that its decisions be consistent with the general plan, if all of the
following requirements are met:
general plan.
The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of the
n:~s~r^vmu, r~14.~ 7.~93 u, 10
2. The planning agency finds, in approving projects and taking other actions,
including the issuance of building permits, each of the following:
a. There is a reasonable probability-that the land use or action
proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which
'will be studied within a reasonable time.
b. There is little or no probability of subsumti~! detriment to or
interference with the future a~t. opted general plan if the proposed use or aCtiOn is ultimately.'
inconsistent with the plan.
c. The proposed use or action complied with all other applicable
requirements of state hw and local ordinances.'
B. The Riverside County General Plan, as mended by the Southwest Area
Community Plan, (hereinafier "SWAP") was adopted prior to the incorporation of Temecuh as
the General Plan for the southwest portion of Riverside County, including the area now within
the boundaries of the City. At this time, the City has adopted SWAP as its General Plan
guidelines while the City is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of its General
Plan.
C. · The Planning Commission in recommending appwval of said applications makes
the following fmdings, to wit:
Development Agreement No. 92-1
1. The City is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of its
General Plan.
2. There is a reasonable probability that the project will be consistent with
the general plan proposal presently being considered subject to the City Council. approving a
High-Density Residential desiguation for Parcel No: 2 of Tentative Parcel Map No. 27314,
Amendment No. 3, since the project will be compatible with surrounding uses and will carry out
the policies intended for the General Plan.
3. There is little or no pwbability of substantinl deXriment to or interference
with the future adopted general plan if the project is ultimately inconsistent with the plan, since
this pwject will not have a negative impact on the surrounding uses.
4. The project complies with all other applicable requirements of state hw
and local ordinances.
5. The environmental impacts of the agreement have been reviewed and all
measures deemed feasible to mitigate adverse impacts thereof have been incorporated into the
City approvals for the project.
6. No other mitigation measures for environmental impacts cTeated by the
project, as presently approved shall be required for development of the projec:t unless mandated
by lawS.
7. The City may, pursuant to and in accordance with its rules, reffulafions,
and ordinances, conduct an environmental review of subsequent di~retionary enti~ements for
the development of the propen3r or any chanffes, amendments, or modifications to the property.
The City, as a result of such review, my impose additional measures (or conditions) on studies
to mitigate as' permitted by law the adverse environmental impa~s of such development
entitlement which were' not considered or mitigated at the time of approval of the project.
Chanlfe of Zone No. 21
1. There is a reasonable probability that Change of Zone No. 21 will be
consistent with the City's future General Plan subject to City Council approving a High-Density
Residential designation for Parcel No. 2 of Tentative hre~l Map No. 27314, Amendment No.
3, which will be completed in a reasonable time and in ac, c,o~c~ with State Law, due to the
fact that the future development of the site will be controlled by a Development Agreement
which is consistent with City's policies for the new General Plan. '
2. There is not a likely probability of substantial detriment to or interference
with the future General Plan, if Change 'of Zone No. 21 is ultimately inconsistent with the plan,
due to fact that the development of the site will be controlled by a Development Agreement
wkich is consistent with the City's policies for the future General Plan.
3. The pwject is compatible with surrounding land uses since this project will
not have negative impacts on the existing school sites to the east and west and the existing and
proposed single-family dwellings to the north and south.
4. The proposal wffi not' have-an adverse effect on the environment, since
mitigation measures .have been incorporated: into the project design to reduce the impacts to a
level of insignificance.
Tentative Parcel Map No. 27314. Amendment No. 3
1. There is a reasonable probability that Tentative Parcel Map No. 27314,
Amendment No. 3 will be consistent with the City's future General Plan subject to City Council
appwving a High-Density Residential designation for Parcel No. 2 of Tentative Parcel Map No.
27314, Amendment No~ 3 which will be completed in a reasonable time and in accordance with
State hw. The project as 'c~nditioned conforms with existing applicable city zoning ordinances
and development standards.
2. There is not a likely probability of substantial detriment to, or interference
with the City' s future General Plan, if the proposed use is ultimately inconsistent with the Plan,
since the future development of tl~e site will be controlled by a Development Agreement which
is consistent with the City's policies for the new. General Plan.
3. The proposed use or action as conditioned complies with .State planning
and ZOning laws. Reference local Ordinances No. 348, 460; and California Governmental Code
Sections'65000-66009 (Phnning and ZOning Law).
health or welfare.
The project as designed and conditioned will not adversely affect the public
5. The project is compatible with surrounding land uses since the proposal
wffi not have a negative impact on the existing school sites to*the east and west and the existing
and proposed single-family dwellings to the noah and south..
6. The project.has acceptable access to dedicated rights-of-way which are
open W, and useable by, vehicular traffic. The project draws access from Pauha Road and
Rancho Vista Road, impwved dedicated City rights-of-way. Project access, as designed and
'condi~oned, conforms with applicable City Engineering sUmdards and ordinances.
7. The project as designed and conditioned will not adversely affect the built
or natural cnvironmcnt as determined in the Environmental Analysis for this project.
8. Said findings are supported by minutes, maps, exhibits and environmental
documents associated with this application and herein incorporated by reference, due to the fact
that they are referenced in the attached Staff Report, Exhibits, Environmental Assessment, and
Conditions of Approval.
F. As conditioned pursuant to Section 3, the Parcel Map pwposed is compatible with
the health,, safety and welfare of the community.
Section 2. Environmental Compliance. An Initial Study prepared for this' project
indicates that the proposed project will not have a significant impact on the environment with
the incorporation of the mitigation measures into the project design, and a Negative Declaration,
is hereby granted.
Section 3. Conditions. That the City. of Temecuh Planning Commission hereby
recommends approval of Development Agreement 92-1, Change of Zone No. 21, and Tentative
Parcel Map No. 27314, Amendment No. 3 located at north of Pauba Road, south of Rancho
Vista Road and east of the Temecuh Valley High School subject to City Council approval of a
High-Density Residential designation for Parcel Map No. '27314, Amendment No. 3 and subject
to the following conditions:
'A. Attachment No. 3, attached hereto.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOFrED this 1st day of March, 1993.
R:~-q~TAFFRF~314.pC 2/24/93
13
LINDA FAHBY
I ~!~,Ry CERTII~ that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 1st day of March,
1993 by the following vote of the Commission:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSB -r':
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COIIMISSIONERS:
G~Y~ORNI-IrtL
S~RET~Y
R:~swr^mom27s14.~ 2r. ss -, 14
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
R:~S~STA~314.pC 204/93 bJb '-
'CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Tentative Parcel Map No. 27314, Amendment No. 3
Project Description: To create four (4) parcels and a
remainder parcel
Assessor's Parcel No.: 955-020-002
Approval Date:
Expiration Date:
WITHIN FORTY-BGHT {48) HOURS OF THE APPROVAL OF THIS PROJECT
'1. The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or
money order payable to the County Clerk in the amount of One Thousand Three Hundred
dollars ($1,300.00), which includes the. On Thousand Two Hundred and Fifty Dollar
($ ! ,250.00) fee, in compliance with AB 3158, required by Fish and Game Code Section
711.4(d)(2) plus the Fifty Dollar (~50.00) County administrative fee to enable the City to
file the Notice of Determination required under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and
14 California Code of Regulations 15075. If within such forty-eight (48) hour period the
aPPlicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check required
above; the approval for the project granted herein shall be void by reason of failure of
condition, Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c).
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
e
'3.
The' tentative subdivision shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act
and to all the requirements of Ordinance No. 460, unless modified by the conditions listed
below. A time extension may be approved in accordance with the State Map Act and
City Ordinance, upon written request, if made 30 days prior to the expiration date.
The subdivider shall defend, indemnify; and hold harmless the City of TemeCula, it agents,
officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City of
Temecula, its advisory agencies, appeal' boards or legislative body concerning Tentative
Parcel Map No. 27314, Amendment No. 3, which action is brought within the time period
provided for in California Government Code Section 66499.37. The City of Temecula will
promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the City
of Temecula and will cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify
the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the
defense, the subdivider shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify; or hold
harmless the City of Temecula.
If Subdivision phasing is proposed, a phasing plan shall be submitted to and approved by
the Planning Director.
The project and all subsequent projects within this site shall be subject to Development
Agreement No. 92-1. '
R:~S~T~i4.pC 2r24/93 ~b 16
10.
11.
The applicant shall consult the Army Corps of Engineers and the California Department
of Fish and Game prior to designing the site plan for the project to mitigate the impacts
to the-wetlands as identified in the Figure 2 of Biological Report which includes the
unvegdtated alluvial wash and the Southern Willow Scrub. A proof of this consultation
shall be submitted to the Planning Department along with the Plot Plan or Conditional Use
Permit applications. These applications shall not be deemed complete without the proof
of consultation with both of these agencies.
All development proposals within this project shall be subject to. further. approvals of the
City of Temecula which include but are not limite~l 'to Plot Plans and Conditional Use-
Permits... '
A full disclosure shall be made to all prospective residents, whether buyers or renters,
that the existing Temecula Valley High School football stadium, tennis courts and other
related facilities will be used extensively for ball games, practices, rock concerts and '
community activities. These events occur during both the daytime and evening hours and
will generate considerable noise and light. The Temecula Valley Unified School District
will not accept responsibility for the impact that these activities may have on the
neighboring complexes, nor will any of these conditions be subject to mitigation by the
district. The disclosure shall be made at the time of initial marketing and through
individual grant deeds. The specific form of. the disclosure shall be approved by the
Planning Director and the City Attorney prior to issuance of building permits..
The proposed project will be impacted by the Temecula Valley High School stadium noise
and light. The following shall be implemented prior to approval of any Plot Plans or
Conditional Use Permits:
A. A noise study shall be submitted. This study shall examine the impact of the
stadium on the proposed residences. Mitigation measures shall be included in the
study including but .not limited to building setbacks from the westerly' property
line, walls, landscaping, building orientation and building design. These mitigation
measures shall reduce the maximum interior noise level to 45 Ldn and the exterior
noise level to 65 Ldn. Tests shall be conduct. ed during sporting events and other ..
special events scheduled for the stadium. ·
A light impact study shall be submitted. Mitigation measures shall be incorporated
into the project design including but not limited to building setbacks from the
westerly property line, walls, landscaping, building orientation and building design.
These mitigation measures shall reduce the impact to a level of insignificance as
determined by the Planning Director.
The entrance gates to the private roads in the multi-family senior complex, if proposed,
shall be set back sufficiently to allow for stacking of cars to avoid blocking the right-of-
way. This condition shall be complied with prior to approval of the Plot Plan.
A pedestrian friendly circulation system shall be designed to separate the pedestrian and
auto circulations by linking parking lots, building and recreation areas together by accent
paving, cross walks, lighting, landscaping and signage.
~:XS'k~rAFI~t!~r~7314.PC 2/24/9'3.]rJb 17 ·
12.
The architecture and the landscaping of the project shall take into account the
surrounding single-family units and schools and effectively buffer them with landscaping
or crea. tea pleasing facade to the neighboring properties especially the single-family units.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS
13.
A Mitigation Monitoring Program shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning
Director.
'14.
A copy of the Rough Grading plans shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning
Director.
15.
16.
17.
A Biology Study shall be prepared for the subject property by a Biologist and submitted
to the Planning· Director for review. Should Stephens' Kangaroo Rat (Dipodomys
stephensi) habitat or other sensitive habitat be determined to exist upon the site, then
mitigation measures to be included in the Miti0ation Monitoring Program. If no habitat
is determined to exist, then the applicant shall comply with the provisions of Ordinance
No. 663 by paying the appropriate fee set ,forth in that ordinance. Should Ordinance No.
663 be superseded by the provisions of a Habitat Conservation Plan prior to the payment
of the fee required by Ordinance No. 663, the applicant shall pay the fee required by the
Habitat Conservation plan as implemented by County ordinance or resolution.
A qualified Paleontologist/archaeOlogist shall be chosen.by the developer and approved
by the Planning Director for consultation and comment on the proposed grading with
respect to potential Paleontological/archaeological. impacts. Should the
Paleontologist/archaeologist find potential is high for impact to significant resources, prior
to commencement of the grading operations a meeting between the
Paleontologist/archaeologist, Planning Director staff and the excavation and grading
contractor shall be arranged. Mitigation measures shall be approved by the Planning
Director and included in a Mitigation Monitoring Program. When necessary, the
Paleontologist/archaeologist or representative shall have the authority to temporarily
divert, redirect or halt grading activity to allow recovery of fossils.
The following Shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Director:
A. A copy of ~e Conceptual Landscape Plans to include:
(1) Drought tolerant plants.
(2)
All plants meeting the following minimum size requirements:
(a) ' All trees shall be a minimum of 15 gallon with at least 50 percent
of trees with a minimum of 24 inch box.
(3)
(b) All shrubs shall be a minimum of 5 gallons.
(c) ' All ground cover shall be a minimum of 8" on the center
Landscaping for the following:
R:LSLSTAFFR.~I4.pC 2F/,4./~3 Ir, Jb 18
(a) The golf course.
(b) Typical slope conditions.
(c) Private common areas including all improvements.
(d)
Shrub planting to completely screen perimeter Walls adjacent to a
public right-of-way equal to sixty-six (66) feet or larger.
· (e) Parkways.
(f) All other interior landscaping.
(4)
(g)
Screening the residences on Parcel No. 2 from the stadium with a
combination of different species of fast growing and tall trees.
(h).
All existing trees. Any existing trees that are removed as a result
of this project shall be replaced with a ratio of 5:1. This
replacement shall be over and above other ordinance requirements.
Hardscaping for the following:
(a) Pedestrian trails within private common areas.
(5) The height, location and the following materials for all walls and fences:
(a)
(b)
Decorative block.for the perimeter of the project adjacent to a Public
Right-of-Way equal to sixty-six (66) feet or larger.
Wrought iron or decorative block and wrought iron combination to
take advantage of views.
Be
(c) Wood fencing shall be used only in the interior of the project.
A copy of the construction, landscape and irrigation 'plans consistent with the
conceptual landscape plans.
Ce
A Security Performance Bond shall be secured with the Planning Director to insure
the installation of landscaping along the westerly property line to screen the high
school stadium immediately after grading operations have been completed.
PRIOR TO RECORDATION OF THE FINAL MAP
18.
The following shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Director:
A. A copy of the Final Map
B. A copy of the Rough Grading Plans
C. A copy of the Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) with the following notes:
P-:XSXSTAFFRPT~Y~I4J~ :2~3 I 19
(1)
(2)
This property is located within thirty (30) miles of Mount Palomar
Observatory. All proposed outdoor lighting systems shall comply with the
California Institute of Technology, Palomar Observatory recommendations.
The 100 year flood plain areas shall be delineated.
(3) Drainage easements shall be kept free of buildings and obstructions.
(4)
A fifty (50) foot wide easement shall be recorded on both sides of the
· wetland habitats as identified in the .Biological Report and shall be
designated a biological open space. The area within thiseasement may be
incorporated into the design of the golf course. (This condition may be
waived by the Planning Director if the applicant submits proof of mitigation
acceptable to the Department of Fish and Game and the Army Core of
Engineers that waves the requirement for this easement).
A copy of the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&R's)
(1)
(2)
CC&R's shall be reviewed and epproved by the Planning Department. The
CC&R's shall include. liability insurance and methods of maintaining open
space, recreation areas, parking areas, private roads, exterior of all
buildings and all landscaped and open areas including parkways.
No lot or dwelling unit in the development shall be sold unless a
corporation, association, property owner's group or similar entity has been
formed with the right to assess all properties individually owned or jointly
owned which have any rights or interest in the use of the common areas
and common facilities in the development, such assessment power to be
sufficient to meet the expenses .of such entity, and with authority to
control, and the duty to maintain, all of said mutually available features of
the development. Such entity shall operate under recorded CC&R's which
shall include compulsory membership of all owners of lots and/or dwelling
units and flexibility of. assessments to meet Changing costs of maintenance,
repairs, and services. Recorded CC&R's shall permit enforcement by the
City for provisions required as Conditions of'A'pproval. The developer shall ·
submit evidence of compliance with this requirement to, and receive
approval of, the city prior to making any such sale. This condition shall not
apply to land dedicated to the City for public purposes.
(3)
Every owner of a dwelling unit or lot shall own as an appurtenance to such
dwelling unit or lot, either (1) an undivided interest in the common areas
and facilities, or (2) a share in the corporation, or voting membership in an
association owning the common areas and facilities.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS
19.
No building permits shall be issued by the City for any residential lot/Unit within the
projecf boundary until the developer/owner or his/her successor's-in-interest provides
evidence of compliance with public facility financing measures. A cash sum of one-
hundred dollars ($100.00) per lot/unit shall be deposited with the City as mitigation for
public library development.
20.
A $400.00 per dwelling unit 'fire mitigation fee shall be assessed prior to issuance of
building permits.
21.
A phasing plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Director for the
installation of the landscaping for parcel 2.
22.
Roof-mounted mechanical equipment shall not be permitted within the of the subdivision,
however solar equipment or any other energy saving devices shall be permitted with
Planning Director approval.
23.
A copy of the construction, landscape and irrigation plans consistent with the conceptual
landscape plans.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF OCCUPANCY PERMITS
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
PUBLIC
If deemed necessary by the Planning Director, the applicant shall provide additional
landscaping to' effectively screen various components of the project.
The applicant shall sign an agreement and/or post a bond with the City to insure the
maintenance of all landscaping within each parcel for a period of one year.
All the Conditions of Approval shall be complied with to the satisfaction of the Director
of Planning, Public Works, Community Services and Building and Safety.
All landscaping for parcels 1, 3 and 4 shall be installed.
The landscaping for parcel 2 shall be installed according tc~ a phasing plan.
WORKS DEPARTMENT
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
29.
30.
31.
It is understood that the developer correctly shows on the tenta~,~ve map all existing and
proposed easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage courses, and
their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and revision.
A Grading Permit for either rough or precise (including all on-site flat work and
improvements) construction shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior
to commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained road right-of-way.
An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way.
R:~STAFFRFI'~?314-1sC 2/24/93 klb 21 ·
32.
33.
PRIOR
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
All improvement plans, grading plans, and landscape and irrigation plans shall be
coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous
tO the ~ite.
Pursuant to Section 66493 of the Subdivision Map Act, any subdivision which is part of
an. existing Assessment District must comply with the requirements of said section.
TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS
A copy Of the grading and improvement plans, along. with' supporting hydrologic and .
hydraulic calculations, shall be submitted to the Riverside County Rood Control.and Water
Conservation District for approval prior to reCordation of the final map or issuance of any
permit. A permit from Riverside County Rood Control and Water Conservation District
is required for work within their right-of-way.
The final grading plan shall be prepared by a' registered Traffic Engineer and shall be
reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works.
All lot drainage shall be directed to the driveway by side yard drainage swales
independent of any other lot.
· The developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No
grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of. Intent has been filed or the project
is shown to be exempt. '
The developer. shall receive written clearance from the following agencies:
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
San Diego Regional Water Quality.
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
Planning Department
Department of Public Works
Riverside County Health Department
Commur~ity Services District
General Telephone
Southern California Edison Company
Southern California Gas Company
A Soils Report shall be prepared by a registered soils engineer and submitted to the
Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address
all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the construction of
engineered structures and pavement sections.
,
An erosion control plan shall be prepared by a registered Traffic Engineer and submitted
to the Department of Public Works for Teview and approval.
Graded but undeveloped land shall be maintained in a weed-free condition and shall be
either planted with interim landscaping, or provided with other erosion control measures
as approved by the Department of Public Works.
R:~STAFPRPT~334.pC 2/'~4/93 ]rJb 22
42.
43.
44~
45.
46.
47.
48.
49.
A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the. prevailing Area
Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new development. The charge is payable
tothe-Riverside County Rood Control and Water Conservation District prior to issuance
of perrhits. 'If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been
credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid.
The developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or easements for any off-site
work performed on adjacem properties as directed by the Department of Public Works at
no cost to any agency,
The developer shall accept and properly dispose of all off-site drainage flowing onto 'or
through the site, In the event the Department of Public Works permits the use of streets
for drainage purposes, the provisions of Section XI of Ordinance No, 460 will apply,
Should the quantities exceed the street capacity, or use of streets be prohibited for
drainage purposes, the developer shall provide adequate facilities as approved by the
Department of Public Works,
The developer shall protect downstream properties from damagecaused by alteration of
the drainage patterns; i.e., concentration or diversion of flow. Protection shall be
provided by constructing adequate drainage facilities, including enlarging existing facilities
or by securing a drainage easement, or by incorporating on-site detention basin facilities
such that the downstream 100-year 'Q~ is not increased as a result of the development
of this project.
A drainage easement shall be obtained from the affected property owners for the release
of concentrated or diverted storm flows onto the adjacent property. A copy of the
drainage easement shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review prior
to recordation. The location of the recorded easement shall be delineated on the grading
plan:
A permit from .the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District is
required for work within their right-of-way.
A site balanced, mass grading. plan for the entire project 'shall be approved by the
Department of Public Works prior to the issuance of any individual parcel's grading permit
and the individual grading plan shall conform to the mass grading plan.
Prior to the issuance of an individual parcel's grading permit, the associated future site
plan shall be approved. It is understood that the project site plan as submitted is for the
purpose of reviewing non-engineering issues. Specific engineering criteria will be
evaluated with future site plan applications. Proposed future site plans shall include, but
not be limited to, the following elements:
Existing and proposed storm drain facilities shall be shown on the future proposed
site plans' along with associated easements. A drainage study shall be provided
to indicate said facilities and verify the adequacy of existing downstream facilities,
otherwise the drainage study shall address the requirements for on-site detention
facilities designed to accommodate the 100-year design runoff without negatively
impacting the downstream facilities. '
R:~SLSTAl~"P, Fr~7314.pC 2/24/93 Idb 23
50.
51.
52.
53.
B. Proposed and existing sewer mains and lift station(s) shall be shown on future site
plans to ensure adequate service and readily available fall for the proposed project.
C. 'Proposed and existing water mains shall be shown on future site plans to ensure
that service is readily available to the proposed project.
Private roads included in future site plans MUST be designed to meet City Public Road
Standards or otherwise app~oved by the Department of Public Works. This should include
but may not be limited to:
A. Minimum road widths of 32-fee~ paved .with. 50-feet/60-feet' right-of-ways Or
easements (shown on typical section).
B. Knuckles being required at 90° 'bends' in the road.
Separation between on-site intersections shall meet current City Standards (200-
ft. minimum).
Cul-de-sac geometrics shall meet current City Standards.
Minimum safe horizontal centerline radii shall be required (all centerline radii should
be identified on the site plan).
90° parking immediately adjacent to the private streets shall be located a minimum
safe distance from intersections.
Distance to the nearest existing off-site access point on Rancho Vista Road and
Pauba. Road shall be identified on the site plan.
Identify whether gates will. be proposed at entrances to project.. If so,
configuration, stacking distance, and turn-around ability will need to be reviewed
and approved by the Fire Department and the Department of Public Works during
the Site Plan review stage.
All intersections shall be perpendicular (900).·
All driveways providing access to two or more buildings shall be designed as a cul-
de-sac or a loop road.
The future site plan application for the Senior Center shall reflect the requirement for a
turn-around at the end of the driveway or loop extended around the buildings.
The grading plan shall be designed to reflect the relocation of the existing reservoir on the
easterly edge of the project to be wholly contained within the remainder parcel. The
preliminary soils report submitted in conjunction with the project grade plan shall address
the dike design necessary to accomplish this.
The grading plan shall be designed to reflect the relocation of the existing access road to
school facilities within the remainder parcel off-site.
54.
PRIOR
55.
56.
57.
Site plan applications which include development impacts over and above those identified
in the aiDproved Tentative Parcel Map/Development Agreement Traffic Study (dated June,
1992).~hall include an updated traffic study. This study may include, and the Department
of Public Works may condition, additional mitigation measures as warranted.
TO THE ISSUANCE OF ENCROACHMENT PERMITS
All necessary grading permit requirements shall have been completed and approved.
Improvement plans including, but not'limited to, streets, parkway'trees, street lights,
driveways, drive aisles, parking lot lighting, drainage facilities and paving shall be prepared
by a registered Traffic Engineer on 24' x 36" mylar sheets and approved by the
Department of Public Works. Final plans (and profiles on streets) shall show the location
of existing utility facilities and easements as directed by the Department of Public Works.
The following criteria shall be observed in the design of the improvement plans to be
submitted to the Department of 'Public Works:
Flow line grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over
A.C. paving.
Driveways shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula Standard Nos.
207/207A and 401 (curb and. sidewalk).
Street lights shall be installed along the public streets adjoining the site in
accordance with Ordinance No. 461 and shall be shown on the improvement plans
as directed by the Department. of Public Works.
Concrete sidewalks shall be constructed along public street frontages in
accordance with City Standard Nos. 400 and 401.
Improvement plans shall extend 300 feet beyond the project boundaries or as
otherwise approved by the Department of Public Works.
Minimum centerline radii shall be in accordance with City'Standard No. 113 or as '
otherwise approved by the Department of Public Works.
All reverse curves shall include a 100-foot minimum tangent section or as
otherwise approved by the Department of Public Works.
All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees or as
approved by the Department of Public Works.
Landscaping shall be limited in the corner.cut-off area of all intersections and
adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum.sight distance and visibility.
All concentrated drainage directed towards the public street shall be conveyed
through under-sidewalk drains.
R:~S~STA~314.pC 2/24/93
58.
59.
PRIOR
The minimum centerline grade for streets shall be 0.50 percent or as otherwise approved
by the Department of Public Works.
Impro~/ement plans per City Standards for the private streets or drives shall be required
for review and approval by the Department of Public Works.
60. All utility systems including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer, and cable TV shall be
provided for underground, with easements provided as required; and designed and
constructed in accordance with City Codes and the utility provider. Telephone, cable TV,
and/or security systems shall be pre-wired in the residence. '. ' . '
61. All utilities, except electrical lines rated 33kv or greater, shall be instailed underground'
62. All conditions of the grading permit and encroachment permit shall be complied with to
the satisfaction of the Public Works Department. '.
63. A construction area traffic control plan shall be designed by a registered Traffic Engineer
and approved by the City Engineer for any street closure and detour or other disruption
to traffic circulation as required by the Department of Public Works.
TO RECORDATION OF FINAL MAP"
64. ·
65.
Any delinquent property 'taxes shall be paid.
The developer shall construct or post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing
the construction of the following public improvements within 18 months in conformance
with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public
Works:
Street improvements, which may include, but are not limited to: pavement, curb
and gutter, sidewalks, drive approaches, street lights, signing, traffic signals, and
other traffic control devices as appropriate;
Storm drain facilities;
Landscaping (slopes and parkways);
D. Erosion control and slope protection;
E. Sewer and domestic water systems; and
F. Undergrounding of proposed utility distribution lines.
66.
67.
68.
69.
70.
71.
72.
As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
San Diego Regional Water Quality.
Rancho California Water District
Eastern Municipal Water District
Riverside County Rood Control and Water Conservation District
City of Temecula Fire Bureau
Planning Department
Department of Public Works
Riverside County Health Department
CATV Franchise
Community Services District
General Telephone
Southern California Edison Company
Southern California Gas Company
Fish and Game
Army Corps of Engineers
All road easements and/or street dedications shall be offered for dedication to the public
and shall continue in force until the City accepts or abandons such offers. All dedications
shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the Department of Public Works.
Complete half-street improvements in Pauba Road and Rancho Vista Road shall be
provided, or bonds for the street improvements may be posted, within the dedicated right-
of-way in accordance with City Standard No. 102 (88-ft/64-ft).
The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site property
interests, and if he/she should fail to do so, the developer shall, prior to submittal of the
final map for recordation, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant
to the Subdivision Map Act, Sections 66462 and 66462.5. Such agreement shall provide
for payment by the developer of all costs incurred by the City to acquire the off-site
property interests required in connection with the subdivision. Security of a .portion of
these costs sha'll be in the form of a cash' deposit in the amount given' in an appraisal
report obtained by the developer, at the developer's cost.. 'f;he appraiser shall have been'
approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal.
Vehicular access shall be restricted on Pauba Road and Rancho Vista Road and so noted
on the final map with the exception of those access points and intersections
recommended per the approved Traffic Report and identified on the approved Tentative
Parcel Map.
A signing and striping plan shall be designed by a registered Traffic Engineer. and
approved by the Department of Public Works for Pauba Road and Rancho Vista Road and
shall be included in the street improvement plans.
Plans for a traffic signal shall be designed by a registered Traffic Engineer and approved
by the Department of Public Works for the intersection of Pauba Road and Margarita Road
and shall be included in the street improvement plans with the second plan check
submittal.
R:~SLqT~314.pC 2/24/93 ]rJb
73.
74.
75.
76'.
77.
78.
79.
80.
81.
82.
83.
84.
A school zone signing and striping plan shall be designed by a registered Traffic Engineer
and approved by the Department of Public Works for the school site within this project.
This will be separate from the street improvement plans and will cover any and all streets
necesiary to provide the appropriate signing and striping.
Prior to designing any of the above plans, contact the Department of Public Works for the
design requirements.
Bus bays will be provided at all existing and future bus stops as .determined by the
Department of Public Works.
A Transportation Demand Management Program will be required.
Corner property line cutoff shall be required per Riverside County Standard No. 805.
Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be required and shall be delineated
and noted on the final map.
Easements for sidewalks for public uses shall be dedicated to the City where sidewalks
meander through private property.
An easement for a joint use driveway shall be provided prior to approval of the final map
or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first.
Easements, when required for roadway slopes, landscape easements, drainage facilities,
· utilities, etc., shall be shown on the final map if they are located within the land division
boundary. All offers of dedication and conveyances shall be submitted for review and
recorded as directed by the Department of Public Works. On-site drainage facilities
located outside of road right-of-way shall be contained within drainage easements and
shown on the final map. A note shall be added to the final map stating "drainage
easements shall be kept free of buildings and obstructions."
Prior to recordation of the final map, an Environmental Constraints Sheet (ECS) shall be
prepared in conjunction with the final map to deiineate identified environmental concerns
and shall be permanently filed with the office of the City Engineer. A copy of the ECS
shall be transmitted to the Planning Department for review and approval. The following
information shall be on the ECS:
The delineation of the area within the 100-year floodplain;
Special Study Zones.
The developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an ECS
recorded with any underlying maps related to the subject property.
The developer shall deposit with the Department o~ Public Works a cash sum as
established per lot, as mitigation towards traffic signal impacts. Should the developer
choose to defer the time of payment of the traffic signal mitigation fee, he may enter into
a written agreement with the City deferring said Payment to the time of issuance of a
building permit. .
R:~S~%'TAPPR]sI'~7314.PC 2/24/93 lrJb 28
85.
-86.
The developer shall notify the City's CATV Franchises of the Intent to Develop. Conduit
shall be installed to CATV Standards at time of street improvements.
A declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&R's) shall be prepared by
the developer and submitted to the Director of Planning, City Engineer, and City attorney.
The CC&R's shall be signed and acknowledged by all parties having any record title
interest in the property to be developed, shall make the City a party thereto, and shall be
enforceable by the City. Yhe CC&R's shall be reviewed and approved by the City and
recorded. The CC&R's shall be submitted to the following Engineering. conditions:
o,
The CC&R's shall be prepared at the developerrs sole.cost and expense.
The CC&R's shall be-in the form and content approved by the Director of Planning,
City Engineer, and the City Attorney, and shall include such provisions as are
required by this approval and as said officials deem necessary to protect the
interest of the City and its residents. .
The CC&R's and Articles of Incorporation of the Property Owner's Association are
subject to the approval of Planning, Department of Public Works, and the City
Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrent with the final map. A recorded copy
shall be provided to the City.
The CC&R's shall provide for the effective establishment, operation, management,
use, repair and maintenance of all common areas, drainage and related facilities.
The CC&R's shall provide that if the property is not maintained in the condition
required by the CC&R's, then the City, after making due demand and giving
reasonable notice, may enter the property and perform, at the owner's sole
expense, any maintenance required thereon by the CC&R's or the City ordinances.
The property shall .be subject to a lien in favor of the City to secure any such
expense. not promptly reimbursed.
(1)
(2)
All parkways, open areas, on-site slopes and landscal~ing shall be
permanently maintained by the association or other means acceptable to
the City. Such proof of this maintenance shall be submitted to Planning
and the Department of Public Works prior to issuance of building permits.
Reciprocal aocess easements and maintenance agreements ensuring access
to all parcels and joint maintenance of all roads, drives or parking areas
shall be provided by CC&R's or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrent
with the map, or prior to the issuance of building permit where no map is
involved.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS
87.
A precise grading plan shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review
and approval. The building pad shall be certified by a registered Traffic Engineer for
location and elevation, and the Soils Engineer shall issue a Final Soils Report addressing
compaction and site conditions.
]~:~S~FAFFRP'D~314.pC 2/24/93 klb 29
89.
Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code,
the approved grading plan, the conditions of the grading permit, City Grading Standards,
and accepted grading construction practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial
conforfnance with the approved rough grading plan.
The developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities
imposed upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public facility
mitigation as required under the EIR/Negative Declaration for the project. The fee to be
paid shall be in the amount in effect at the time of payment of the fee. If an interim or
final public facility m!tigation fee or district has not been finally established 'by the date
on which developer requests its building permits for the Project or any phase thereof, the
developer shall execute the Agreement for payment of Public Facility fee, a copy of which
has been provided to developer. Concurrently with executing this Agreement, developer
shall post a bond to secure payment of the Public Facility fee. The amount of the bond
shall be $2.00 per square foot, not to exceed 810,000. The developer understands that
said Agreement may require the payment of fees in excess of those now estimated
(assuming benefit to the project in the amount of such fees). By execution of this
Agreement, the developer will waive any right to protest the provisions of this Condition,
of this Agreement, the formation of any traffic impact fee district, or the process, levy,
or collection of any traffic mitigation or traffic impact fee for this project; provided. that
developer is not waiving its right to protest the reasonableness of any traffic impact fee,
and the amount thereof. ·
PRIOR
90.
91.
92.
93.
TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY
All improvements shall be completed and in place per the approved plans, including but
not limited to, curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, drainage
facilities, parkway trees and street lights on all interior public streets.
All signing and striping shall be installed per the approved signing and striping plan.
The traffic signal at Pauba Road and Margarita Road shall be installed and operational per
the special provisions and the approved traffic signal plan. (At the developer's request,
the City will enter into a reimbursement'agreement for costs over and above the app~oved
project's impacts, as dictated by future approved'traffic Studies.)
All school zone signing and striping shall be installed per the approved school zone signing
and striping plan.
94.
95.
The developer shall provide "STOP" controls at the intersection of local streets with
arterial streets as directed by the Department of Public Works.
Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersection and adjacent to
driveways to provide for minimum sight distance as directed by the Department of Public
Works.
96.
Asphaltic emulsion (fog seal) shall be applied only as directed by the Department of Public
Works at a rate of 0.05 gallon per square yard. Asphalt emulsion shall conform to
Section Nos. 37, 39, and 94 of the State Standard Specifications.
R:XSXSTAFFR~,rX2'~4.~ 2r~ tm 30.
OTHER AGENCIES
97.
The applicant shall comply with the environmental health recommendations outlined in
the RiVerside County Health Department's transmittal dated July 1 1992, a copy of
which is attached, '
98.
The applicant shall comply with the fire improvement recommendati'ons outlined in the
CounW of Riverside Fire Department's letter dated May 4, 1992, a copy of which is
attached.
99.
The applican~ shall comply with the recommendations Outlined in the .Eastern Municipal
Water District transmittal dated March 12, 1992, a copy of which is attached.
100. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Rancho California
Water District transmittal dated May 7, 1'992, a copy of which is attached.
101.
102.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Riverside Transit
Agency transmittal dated March 2,. 1992, a copy of which is attached.
The applicant shall comply with .the recommendations outlined in the ' Temecula
Community Services District transmittal dated August 12, 1992, a copy of which is
attached.
R:~\STAFFRP~I4.pC 2/241{)3 ]rib 31
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
HEALTH SERVICES AGENCY
9851 Magnolia · Rivehide, CA 92503
July 1, 1992
KgiNETBB. COREN
Dim,or
(714) 358-7808
CITY OF TEMECULA
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
ATTN: Saied Naaseh:
RE: TENTATIVE TRACT NAP NO. 27'314: BEING A PORTION OF THE
RANCHO TEMECLJLA, AS GRANTED BY U.$. GOVERNMENT TO LUIS
VIGNES BY. PATENT DATED 1-18-19~0, AS SHOWN BY LIBER 19 PAGE
;~7, RECORDS OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, AN PARCELS 192,&3 OF
PARCEL; MAP B3/97-100 RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, LOCATED
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA,
( 4 LOTS )
Dear Gentlemen:.
The Department of Environmental Health has reviewed
Tentative Tract Map No.. 27514 and recommends:'
A water system shall be installed according to plans and
specifications as approved by the water company and the
Health Department. Permanent prints of the plans of the
water system shall be submitted in triplicate, with a
minimum scale not less than one inch equals 200 feet, along
with the original drawing to the County Surveyor. The
prints shall show the internal pipe diameter, location
valves and fire hydrants; p~pe and joint specifications, and
the si=e of the main at the junction'of the new system to
the existing system. The plans shall cGmply in all respects
'with Div. 5, Part 1, Chapter 7 of the California Health and
Safety Code, California Administrative Code, Title
Chapter 16, and General Order No. 105 of the Public
Utilities Commission of the State of California, when
applicable. The plans shall be signed by a registered
engineer and water comDany with the following certification:
"I certify that the design of the water system in Tract Map
27514 is in accordance with the water system expansion plans
of the Rancho California Water District and that the water
services, storage, and distribution system will be adequate
to provide water service to such Tract Map."
~ c~92~
(714) 358-50~a
City of Temecul a
Page Two
Attn: Sai ed Naaseh
J bl y I, 19~2
This certification does not constitute a guarantee that-i't
will supply w&ter to such Tract Map.at any specific
quantities, flows or pressures for fire protection or any
other purpose". This certification shall be signed by a
responsible official of the water company. The plans must
be submitted to The County Surveyor's Office to review at
least two weeks prior to the request for the recordation of
the final maD.
This subdivision has a statement from Rancho California
Water District agreeing to serve domestic water to each and
every lot in the subdivision on demand providing
satisfactory financial arrangements are completed with the
subdivider. It will be necessary for financial arrangements
to be ma~e prior to the recordation of the final map.
This subdivision is within the Eastern Municipal Water
District and shall be connected to the sewers of the
District. The sewer system shall be installed according to
plans and specifications as approved by the District, the
County Surveyor and the Health Department. Permanent prints
of the plans of the sewer system shall be submitted in
triplicate, along with the original drawing, to the County
Surveyor. The prints shall show the internal pipe diameter,
specifications and the size of the sewers at the junction of
the new system to the-existi.ng.system. A single. plat
indicating location of sewer lines and.'water lines shall be
a portion of the sewage plans and.profiles.
The Olans shall be signed by a registered engineer and the
sewer district with the following certification: "I certify
that the design of the sewer system in Tract Map No. 27514
is in accordance with the sewer system expansion plans of
the Eastern Municipal Water District and that the waste
disposal system is adequate at this time to treat the
anticipated wastes from the proposed Tract Map."
City of Temecul a
Page Three
· Attn: Sai ed Naaseh
~uly 1, 1992
The 01ans must be submitted to the County Survevor's Office
to review 'at.least two weeks orior to the request for the
recordation of the final mao.
It will be necessary for financial arrangements to be
completely. finalized prior to recordation of the final map.
It will by necessary for the annexation proceedings to be
completely finalized prior to the recordation of the final
map.
Si ncer el y,
~m/~.H.S.· IV
Department of Environmental Health
SN:dr
· -- " RIVERSIDE COUNTY
· 210 WEST SAN JAClNTO AVENUE · PEXRIS, CALIFORNIA 92370
~ ' C/14) 6~7-3183
MAY 4,-1992
TO; CITY OF TEMECULA
ATTEN; PLANNING DEPARTMENT
RE: TENTATIVE TRACT 275~4
CHANGE OF ZONE No. 21
AMENDED No. I
With' resoect to the review and/or approval of the above refer-'
enced project, the Fire DeDartment has no comments or conditions
regarding the tract map and will address all necessary FAre
Protection measures when the plot plan or project developement
plan is reviewed.
All 'Questions regarding the meaning of conditions shall be re-
ferred to the Planning and.Engineering Staff.
RAYMOND H. REGIS
Chief Fire Department Planner
Michael E. Gray,
Fire Captain Specialist
F) INDIO OFFICE
79-733 C, mmtry Club Dr4,~ Sub= F, ~ CA 92201
(619) 34_2-~J~___ · FAX (619) 77,q-2072
PLANNING riMS!ON
['IRIVERS~OFFIC~
3760 12th Saul, J~ CA 92501
(714) 275-4777 · FAX (714) 369-7451
March 12, lggZ
(Oa~e)
RIverside County Health Department
c/o Albert A. Webb Associates
3788 McCray 5treeE
R~verslde, CA 92506 '
Gentlemen:'
Re: Availability of Santtary Seer $ervfce for
:. 13 199Z
Tentative Parcel Nap 27324
14e hereby advtse you Pelattve to the avatlab~lfty of santtary sewer service
for the above referenced proposed development as follows:
The property to be occupqed by the subject proposed development:
/-XX7 ZS PRESENTLY LOCATED w~thtn the boundary 11nee of tMs DtstHct's
~mprovement Dlstrict No. U-8 and ~s eltg~ble to recetve sanitary
sewer servl ce, '
Z__/IllST BE ANNEXED to this Otstr~ct.'s Improvement Dtstr~ct No.
following which It wtl1 be eligible to recetve santtary sewer
servtce,
/"7' met BE INCLUDED tn a new Dtstr~ct Improvement d~strict, assess-'
men: dtstrtc~ or other program to be formed and Implemented for
the Pu~ose of providing santtary sewer facilities and service
for the generaT area within which th~s proposed 'development ts
1. ocated, following which tt wfll be eltgtble to recetve sanitary
sewer serv~ce,
provided:
z)
z)
If you have any questions or con~ents regarding the foregoing, do not
to contact th~s office,
Very ~Puly your_ ,
Assistant Dtrecl:or of Customer Service
The develope~ completes all. necessary ffna~c~8l and other
arrangements Chorefore, as de=ermlned by the Dtstr~ct, w~th the
Dlstrtct by September 1993 ;
That no LZMFTZNG CONDFFZONS exist which ARE BEYOND thts DZb'rRZCT'S
CONTROL or CANNOi B~ COST EFFECTZVELY and/or reasonably satlsfieO
by the DIstrict, which conditions my ~nclude but are not limited
to, acts of God, REGULATORY AGENCY REQUZRENENT$ or decisions,
or-legal acttons tn~tlatee by o~ers;
hesitate
'~aiZ %: P,sr Office R,x R~O0 , S~n]acinrn. Glibrhea g25Rl~l~O0 , Tetep~ x714~ 925-7676 , Fu c71.1~ 9~5T
,Main Office: 20. i5 & ~n.l~ntn Sty. ~nJ~inr. · G~rx,mer ~n'ic~'E~i~i~ An~ ~ g ~kla~ A~. Hc~:. C~
FOR DISTRICT USE ~H~
1.
Names and Addresses of Involved Parties:
Involvement Name
Owner of Property Ltnfteld School
Address
31950 Peuba Road
Temecula, CA 92590
'Developer
Developer's Engineer
Albert A. ~bb Ass'oc,
3788 NcCray Street
R1versfde. CA qP,~O6
General Location of the involved property:
North side of Pauba Read. We~t nf ~,i~r
Brief legal description of the tnvolved property:
Tentative Parr, j1 H~p :r7314
Number of proposed lots/parcels 4 Parcels
Estimated number of dwelling units (or equivalent)
Other pertinent information
Zoned Senior Citizen. Convalescent
Small scale map of the subject proposed development
Area
96.7 (in acres)
Irahobo
Wmr
May 7, 1992
Mr. Saied Nnasch
City of Tcmecula
Planning Department
43180 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92390
Water Avm'iab~ity
Tentative Tract Map 27314
Change of Zone 21
Dear Mr. Naaseh:
Please be advised that the above-referenced properly is located within the
boundaries of Rancho California Water District CRCWD). Water service,
therefore, would be available upon completion of financial arrangements
between RC"WD and the property owner.
Water availab~ity would be contingent upon the property owner signing an
Agency Agreement which assigns water management rights, if any, to RCWD.
If you have any questions, please contact .Ms. Senga Dohcrty.
Sincerely,
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT
Steve Brannon, P. E.
Manager of Development Engineering
cc: Senga Doherty, Engineering Technician
I
- 7'A
RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY
1825 THIRD STREET · RIVERSDE. CA 92507-3484 · BUS. [714] 684-08513 FAX [714}
March 2, 1992
Saled Naaseh
City of Ternecula
Planning Department
43174 Business Park Drive
Ternecula, CA 92590
RE: TT 27314
Dear Said:
We do net currently provide service to the site mentioned above but based on the size of the
project and our own plans for future growlh, we are requesting that a bus turnout or a pad for a bus
stop be incorporated into the general design.
Ideal site for the bus turnout would be on northside comer of Paube Road adjacent to Pamel 3 just
before main entrance to the senior citizen housing.
If possible, we would also like to request that peclestdan walkways and wheelchair curb be
provided near the tumout location specified above. I can indicate the exact location for the
turnout as the project progresses.
Thank you for the opportunity to review and .comment on this project. Your efforts to keep us
updated on the stmus of this request will be very much appreciated. Please let us know when this
project will be completed.
Should you require additional information or specifications, please don't hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
Barbara A. Bray
Transit Planner
ss/jsc
PDEV #151
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
REFERENCE:
SAm'r~ NAASEH
SKAWNNI=:t-~ON
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNIYY SERVICES
AUGUST 12, 1992
TENTATIVETRACT NO. 27314, ~MENT NO.2
The Temecula Community Senric~ Disn~ (TCSD) staff has reviewed the conditions as
s~t forth in tlie City of Temecula Conditions of Approval and recommends APPROVAL
of Tentative Tract Map No. 27314, Amendment No. 2,'subject to the d~eloper or his
assignee conforming to the TCSD Quimby Ordinance No.' 460.93 as attached.
All questions r~garding the m~ning of the attached conditions shall be referred to the
'TCSD.
Gary King
~ryl Yasinosky
Debbi~ Ubnoflc~
All proposed slopes, open space, and parkland inumded for-dedication to the TCSD for
maintenance purposes shall be identified on the final map by numbered lots and indexed to
identify said lot numbers as a proposed TCSD maintenance areas. "
Exterior slopes (as defined as: those slopes contiguous to public streets that have a width of 66'
or grater), shall be offered for dedication W the TCSD for maintenance purposes following
compliance to existing City Standards and completion of an application process. All other slopes
shall bc maintained by an established Home Owners Association CHOA).
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
EXHIBITS
R:~STA~I4,]"~ 2/24/1~ ~ 32
CITY OF TEMECULA
./
/7
./
/
/
CASE NO.:
~XHIRIT: A
==~ DATE:
Development Agreement No. 92-01
Change of Zone No. 21
Tentative Parcel Map No. 27314, ~,mendment No. 3
Mnrch 1, 1~)3
,:\5~3TA~314.?C 2/24/93
SITE PLAN
CITY OF TEMECULA
"rR2s075ol
CASE NO.:
Development Agreement No. 92-01
Change of Zone No. 21
Tentative Parcel Map No. 27314, Amendment No. 3
~:XHmIT: B TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP
P.C. DATE: March 1, '1993
ATTACHMENT NO. 4
INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY
R:~S~TA~!4.pC 2/24/~3 kib 33
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
INITIAL ENVIRO~AL STUDY
H
BACKGROUND
Name of Proponent:
Address and Phone
Number of Proponent:
Linfield Christian School.
31950 Pauba Road .
Temecula, CA 92592
3. Date of Environmental
Assessment:
4. Agency Requiring
Assessment:
June 20, 1992
CITY OF TEMECULA
5. Name of Proposal,
if applicable:
6. Location. of Proposal:
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
N/A
Surrounded by Panba Road to the south and Rancho
Vista Road to the north and 700 feet east of Margarita
Road
(Explanations of all answers are provided on attached sheets.)
C,
do
Will the proposal result in:
Unstable earth conditions or in
changes in geologic substructures7
Disruptions, displacements, compac-
tion or overcovering of the soil? '
Substantial change in topography
or ground surface relief features?
The destruction, covering or modi-
fication of any unique geologic or
physical features?
Ye~
.X
Maybe No
_ X
-- ..X
_ X
R:XS%STAFFRPT%27314.1ES 2/23/93 Idb
2. Air.
a.
b,
3. Water.
a.
be
C,
d,
R:\S~,STAFFRPT~27314.1ES 2123/93 Idb
Any substantial increase in wind or
water erosion of soils, either on
or off site?
Changes in deposition or' erosion
of beth sands, or changes in
silta~on, deposition or erosion
which may modify the channel of a
river or stream or the-bed of the
ocean or any bay, inlet or lake?
Exposure of people. or property
to geologic hazards such as earth
quakes, landslides, mudslides,
ground failure, or similar hazards?
Will the proposal result .in:
Substantial air emissions or
deterioration of ambient air
quality?
The creation of objectionable
odors?
Alteration of air movement,
moisture, or temperature, or any
change in climate, whether locally
or regionally?
Will the proposal result in:
Substantial changes in Currents, or
the course or direction of water
movements, in either marine or
fresh waters?
Substantial changes in absorption
rates, drainage patterns, or the
rate and amount of surfac~ runoff?.
Alterations to the course or flow
of flood waters?
Change in the amount of surface
water in any water body?
X
Ma_vt~
X
X
X
X
X
..X
.X
X
ee
ge
Discharge into surface waters, or
in any alteration of surface water
quality, ingluding, but not limited
to, temperature, dissolved oxygen
or turbidity?
Alteration of the direction or rate
of flow of ground waters?
Change in ~ quantity of ground
waters, either through direct addi-
tions or withdrawals, or through
interception of an aquifer by cuts
or excavations?
Substantial reduaion in the amount
of water otherwise available for
public water sapplies?
Exposure of people or property to
water related hazards such as flood-
ing or tidal waves?
Plant Life. Will the proposal result in:
a,
c,
d,
Change in the diversity of species,
or number of any native species of
plants (including trees, shrubs,
grass, crops, and aquatic plants)?
Reduction of the numbers of any
unique, rare, or endangered species.
of plants? .. ..
Introduction of new species of
plants into an area of native
vegetation, or in a barrier to the
normal replenishment of existing
species?
Substantial reduction in acreage
of any agricultural crop?
Yes
X
.X
Maybe
.X
X
.X
..X
X
R:\S\STAFFRPT~27314.1ES 2123/93 Idb
10.
Animal Life. Will the proposal result
in:
ae
Change in the diversity of species,
or numbers of any species of animals
(birds, land animals including rep-
organisms or inseas)?
Reduction of the numbers of any
unique, rare or rodangered species
of animals?
Deterioration to existing fish or ·
wildlife habitat?.
Noise. Will the proposal result in:
a. Increases in existing noise levels?
Exposure of people to severe noise
levels?
Light and Glare. Will the proposal
produce substantial new light or glare?
Land Use. Will the proposal result in a
substantial alteration of the present or
planned land use of an area? -
Natural Resources. Will the proposal
result in:
a,
Substantial increase in the rate of
use of any natural resources?
Substantial depletion of any non-
renewable natural resource?
Risk of Ulmet. Will the proposal
involve:
a,
A risk of an explosion or the release
of hazardous substances (including,
but not limited to, oil, pesticides,
chemicals or radiation) in the event
of an accident or upset conditions?
Yes
X
Maybe
X
X
X
..X
X
X
.X
X
R:%S\STAFFRPT%27314.1E$ 2123/93 klb
11.
-12.
13.
14.
Possible interference with an emerg-
ency response plan or an emergency
evacuation plan?
Population. Will the proposal alter
the location, distribution, density, or
growth rate of the human population of
an area?
HOusing. -Will the proposal affect.
existing housing or create a 'demand for
additional housin~
Transportafion/Ciradafion. Will the
proposal result in:
Generation of substantial additional
vehicular movement?.
Effects on existing parking facili-
ties, or demand for new parking?
C,
Substantial impact upon existing.
transportation systems?
Alterations to present patterns of
circulation or movement of people
and/or goods?
e,
Alterations to waterborne, rail or
air traffic?
f, -
Increase in traffic hazards to motor
vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians?
Public Services. Will the proposal have
substantial effect upon, or result in a
need for new or altered governmental
services in any of the following areas:
a. Fire protection?
b. Police protection?
c. Schools?
d. Parks or other recreational.
facilities?
Yes
X
X
Ma_vb,
.X
X
...X
X
X
X
X
.X
R:%S%STAFFRFT'~27314.1ES 2123/93 Idb
16.
17.
18.
ee
'M, intenAnCe Of public facilities,
including roads?
f. Other govern~ service~:
Eaeqy. Wiil the proposal result in:
Use of substantial amounts of fuel
or energy?
be
Substantial hcrease in demand
upon existing sources of energy,..
or require the development of new
sources of energy?
Utilities. Will the proposal result in
a need for new systems, or substantial
alterations to the following utilities:
a. Power or natural gas?
b. Communications systems?
c. Water?
d. Sewer or septic tanks?
e. Storm. water drainage?
f. Solid waste and disposal?
Human Hea!ffi.-'.Will the proposal
result in:
Creation of any health hazard or
potential health hazard (excluding
mental health)? ..
be
Exposure of people to potential
health hazards?
Aesthetics. Will the proposal result
in the obstruction of any scenic vista
or view open to the public, or will the
proposal result in the creation of an
aesthetically offensive site open to
public view?
R:\S%STAFFRFT'%27314.1ES 2123/93 klb
Yes
Maybe No
_ X
--. X
-- X
· . X
__ X
-- .X
X
19.
Recreation. Will the proposal result in
an impact upon the quality or quantity
of existing recreational opportunities?
Cultural Resources.
ae
Will the proposal result in the
alteration of or the destruction
of a prehistoric or historic
archaeological site?
be
Will the proposal result in adverse
physical or aesthetic effects to a
prehistoric or historic building,
structure, or object?
Cs
Does the proposal have the potential
to cause a physical change which
would affect unique e~hnic cultural
values?
de
Will the proposal restrict existing
religious or sacred uses within the
potential impact area?
2 I. · Mandatory Findings of Significance.
a,
Does the project have the potential
to degrade the quality of the
environment, substantially reduce
the habitat of a fish or wildlife
species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self
sustaining levels, threaten to
eliminate a plant or animal or
eliminate important examples of
the major periods of California
history or prehistory?
bs
Does the project have the-potential
to achieve short-term, to the
disadvantage of long-term, environ-
mental goals? (A short-term
impact on the environment is one
which occurs in a relatively brief,
definitive period of time while long-
term impacts will endure well into
the future.)
Yes
X
Ma_vbe
X
X
X
X
X
R:\S\STAFFRPT%27314.1ES 2123/93 Idb
Does the projea have impacts which
are individually limited, but cumu-
latively considerable? (A project's
im,nact on two or more separate
resources may be relatively small,
but where the effect of the total of
those impacts on the environment
is significant.)
Does the project have environmental
effects which will cause substan-
tial advene effects On human beings,
either directly or indirectly?.
Yes
X
X
R:~'S\STAFFRPT'%27314.1ES 2123/93 Idb
HI DISCUSSION OF ~ ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
1 .c.d.
I.e.
1.f.
1.g.
Air
2.b.
2.c.
No. The proposed project is not anticipalzd to cause changes in geologic substructures
and create unstable earth conditions. 'Since this approval does not provide entitlements
for structures, no mitigation measures are necessary at this point. 'However, the Public
Works Department is responsible for implementation of necessary mitigation measures
prior .to issuance of grading permits w insure stable earth conditions for the project.
Yes. The approval of this project will not cause disruptions, displacements, compaction
or overcovering of the soil. The ultimate development of this site will eventually cause
these conditions. However, these conditions will not cause a substantial impact on the
environment as no substantial changes in Wpography are necessary.
No. The project site does not contain unique geologic or physical features as determined
by a site inspection. Therefore, no substantial changes in wpography or ground surface
relief futures will result. There is no substantial environmental impact:
Maybe. The ultimate buildout of the projea may result in wind and water erosion of
soils as a result of grading. However, standard mitigation measures during the grading
stage including watering the disturbed areas to prevent dust and proper erosion control
during and after the grading will reduce the impacts to a level of insignificance.
No. The site drainage for this projea will be channeled through existing improvements
and the runoff from this projea is not anticipated to cause any offsite erosion. No
significant impacts are anticipated.
No. The project site is not located in an earthquake~ landslide, mudslide, ground failure
hazard zones as determined in the Southwest Area Plan (SWAP). No significant impacts
are anticipated.
No. The construction equipment associated with the construction of the project and the
traffic generated by the ultimate residents and user's of the project are the major
contributors to air emissions. However, these impacts are not considered significant
since the construction is for a limited time only and the traffic generated from a senior
housing project is not significant.
No. Objeaionable odors are usually associated with commercial and industrial uses.
Since this project is exclusively residential in nature there are no significant impacts.
No. Due to the size of the project site and its location within the South Coast Air Basin,
the alteration of air movements, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate would
not occur in conjunction with the ultimate development of the proposed project. No
significant impacts are anticipated.
R:\S\STAFFRPT~27314,1ES 2/23/93 Idb
Water
3.a.
3.c.
3.d.
3.e.
3.f.
3.g.
3.h.
3.i.
Plant Life
No. The ultimate development of the proposed projea will not result in increased storm
water flows in any marine or fresh waters. No significant impacts are anticipated.
Yes. By covering the project site with concrete, uphalt and landscaping, the absorption
rate of the site under existing conditiom would be reduced and the amount of surface
runoff would be hcreased. The existing 120 inch storm drain is sufficient to carry this
runoff; therefore,. no sighi~caut impacts are anticipated.
Maybe. The ultimate buildout of the project will result in construction of dwelling units
in the flood plain. The pads for these dwellin~s will be elevated above the flood plain.
No significant impacts are anticipated to the course or flow of flood waters.
No. The construction of impervious surfaces on the project site will not substantially
alter the existing drainage patterns norproposed drainage patterns bec__ause of the size and
location of the project. No significant impacts are anticipated.
No. Swrmwater runoff and possibly irrigntlon runoff from the proposed project would
ultimately flow into the Santa Margarita River. Runoff polhtants will be typical of those
of urbanized areas, including mowr oil, pesticides, berbicides and fertilizers. This
impact will be mitigated by the clearance issued by the State Water Resources Control
Board. This clearance will insure compliance with the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (hIPDES). No significant impacts are anticipated.
No. The runoff from the project is conveyed to Murrieta and Temecula Creeks which
flow into the Santa Margarita River. Both Murrieta and Temecula Creeks and the Santa
Margarita River recharge the Found water in the Murrieta-Temecula basin. The runoff
from this project is not anticipated to change the direction or rate of flow of ground
waters. No significant impacts are anticipated.
No. The project site is within Rancho Water District and will not draw from the ground
water for their everyday use. Therefore, no significant impacts are antic!pated.
No. Rancho Water District has indicated the availability'of water to serve this project.
Therefore, there is no potential for substantial reduction in the availability of water. No.
significant impacts are anticipated.
Maybe. A portion of the project site is within the flood plain. However, the project will
be conditioned to construct the dwelling units above the flood plain limit per the FEMA
standards which will mitigate any impacts to people and property from water related
hazards such as flooding. No significant impacts are anticipated.
4.a.c.
Yes. The Biological Assessment prepared for the project site determined existence of
Non-U.S. waters wedand on the site. The project is conditioned for obtaining clearances
from Fish and Game and Army Corps of Engineers prior to approval of any development
R:\S%STAFFRPT%27314.1ES 2/23f83 Idb ~,
4.b.c.
5.b.
5.c.
Noise
6.a.
6.b.
applications. The project in general will introduce new species of plants and will
eliminate the native plants present at this time. However,. none of the existing species
are considered sensitive. No significant impacts are anticipated.
No. The proposed project will not reduce the numbers of any unique, rare, or
endangered species of plants as determined by the Biological Assessment. The project
site is not presea~y being used for agricultural purposes; therefore, no significant impacts
are anticipated.
Maybe. The ultimate devdopment of the site may eliminate some of the native animals
on the site however, some may survive in an urban environment. The only additions to
the animal life are expected to be household pets. The impact of this development is not
considered significant for this category.
No. The biological study recommended a focused K-Rat survey which identified no
Steven's Kangaroo Rats on the site.. No other sensitive or endangered species were
identified on the site by the biological study. Therefore, no significant impacts are
anticipated.
No. Since there is no significant habitat for any sensitive species' other than the wetland
there is no significant impact. The weftands will be protected by two fifW (50) foot
easements and will be incorporated into the design of the golf course.
No. The ultimate development of the site will not significantly increase the existing noise
levels. The short term impacts are associated with the construction of the project and the
long term impacts will mos~y result from the traffic generated by this project. Due to
the size and location of this project these impacts are not considered significant.
Maybe. The proposed project. abuts an existing high school stadium. The noise
generated from this stadium is expected to impact at least a portion of the senior housing
project. Since the exact location and type of the dwelling units is not known at this time,
a detailed noise study will be required to mitigate the impacts of the stadium noise on this
project. The mitigation measures may include building orientation, design features,
landscaping, etc. No significant impacts are anticipated.
Light and Glare
No. The project will not result in a significant increase in the light and glare of the area.
Furthermore, the project will be conditioned to comply with Mt. Palomar lighting.
requirements. All lights will be conditioned to be directed on site, therefore, reducing
the impact on the neighboring proponies to a level of insignificance.
R:\S\STAFFRPT~27314.1ES 2/23/93 klb
The light and glare produced from the high school stadium will impact' this project which
has been conditioned to deal with this impact. The conditions will be enforced at the plot
plan stage and include building orientation, building design, setbacks, etc.
Land Use
Yes. This project includes a zone change from R-R to R-3. The R-R zoning designation
'permits low density single family development with minimum .S acr~ lots and a variety
of commercial uses. The R-3 zoning designation will. create high density senior housing ~
and the supporting uses which will be dictated by the Development Agreement. 'This
change will not result in a significant impact because of the .low impact nature of senior
housing.
Natural Resources
'9.a.b.
No. Implementation of the proposed project would increase the rate of consumption of
both renewable and nonrenewable natural rmources during construction and project
operation. Natural. resources consumed during construction would be aggregate
materials, timber, and energy resources for on-site construction equipment and for
transport vehicles which would bring supplies to the site. At build out, energy resources
required during project operation would include gasoline, natural gas for heating and
cooling, electricity for lighting, and appliances. As all of these resources are readily
available commercially, the proposed project would not have a significant impact on
natural resources.
Risk of Upset
lO.a.
No. The proposed project is residential in nature and it is not expected to house any
material with the potential for an explosion or the release of hazardous substance. The
gasoline in the tanks of the residents' and the visitors' cars and the pmticides used for
maintenance of the landscaping are not expected to create significant impacts.
lO.b.
No. The proposed project will be reviewed by the Fire Department at the Plot Plan
stage; therefore, all response time and emergency vehicle turnarounds will-be examined
at that stage: No significant impacts are anticipated.
Population
ll.a.
No. The ultimate build out of the project will increase the senior citizen population in
the project vicinity. This increase could be in the form of out of town residents moving
into the city, relocation of Temecula residents in the area or a combination of the two.
This impact is not expected to be significant.
Ho~inp
12.
Yes. This project will have a positive impact on the housing in the region since it will
provide additional housing for senior citizens. No negative significant impact is
anticipated.
R:\S\STAI::FRPT~27314.1ES 2/23/93 Idb -' ~
T~rtation/Circulafion
13.a.c.
Maybe. The project will generate approximately 1,610 daily vehicle trips, 130 of which
are expected to occur during the evening peak hour. According to the traffic study, the
major intersections impacted by this projea will operate at Level of Service C or better.
No significant impacts are anticipated since mitigation measures have been incorporated
into the project. These mitigation measures include improving Pauba Road and Rancho
· Vista Road bordering the project to their ultimate half-section widths as secondary
highways (88 feet right-of-way) in conjunction with development. A painted median with
left turn pockets will be provided fo.r traffic on Rancho Vista Road 'and on Pauba Road
desiring to turn left into the project entrances. The project will be required to participate'
in the future construction doff-site capital improvements through established procedures.
13.b.
No. The project will not create additional demand on existing paricing facilities since the
proper number of parking spaces will be provided for the site as required by Ordinance
No. 348. Therefore, no significant impacts are anticipated.-
13.d.
No. The development of this project will not cause any alterations to present patterns of
circulation or movement of people and/or goods since the major roads are already
established in the vicinity of the projea. Therefore, no significant impacts are
anticipated.
13.e.
No. This projea will not cause alterations to waterb0rne, rail or air traffic due to the
nature of the project, its geographic location, and local transportation system. Therefore,
no significant impacts are anticipated.
13.f.
Maybe. Project-related traffic could ereate new traffic hazards to motor vehicles,
bicyclists, and pedestrians, both on and off the project site. Points of conflict would be
created as a result of additional points of ingress and egress along Pauba Road and
Rancho Vista Road.. Internal circulation patterns could also result in potential hazards
to pedestrians.
The following measures need to be incorporated inW the project design to reduce the
impacts of the project to an insignificant level:
The gate for the proposed senior housing should be setback from the Right-of-
Way to allow for proper stacking of cars behind the gate.
Vehicular and pedestrian entries to the project should be clearly identifiable to
visiWrs through the use of signage, l~ardscaping and landscaping.
Circulation within the site should be designed to minimiTe conflicts between
automobiles and pedestrians.
A pedestrian friendly design needs to be incorporated into the project design
providing adequate pedestrian circulation. Accent paving, crosswalks,
landscaped walkways and adequate lighting should be used to identify and
enhance pedestrian walks.
,...__ R:\S\STAFFRPT",27314.1ES 2123193 klb
Consideration should be given to providing safe pedestrian access through
parking areas and from the public street walkways to building entrances.
Public 5m-vices
'14.a.
No. Mitigation fe~ of $400.00 dollars for each unit will be coilrood to mitigate the
impam of this d~e, iopmeat on Fir~ Service. The Fire Department Will review the Hot
Plan for this project to insure sdequsW service. No significant impacts are anticipated.
14.b.
No. The City of Temecula is contracting through the 'Riverside 'County Sheriffs
Department for law enforcement services. This contract provides for thirty-one sworn
officers and seven non-sworn officers. Additional services are provided to the City
through various divisions within the Sheriff's Department. The average response time
for priority one calls is 6.5 minutes and according to the Sheriffs Department this
response time is well within industry sUmdards for adequate service levels. The City
intends to maintain a ratio of I officer per 1,000 residents. No significant impacts are
anticipated. ,
14.c.
No. The proposed project is an exclusively senior housing project. No school aged
children are anticipated to be generated from this project. No significant impacts are
anticipated.
14.d.
No. The proposed project will include a private golf course and other active amenities.
A senior center might also be a part of this project which will create new activities for
the residents. No significant impacts are anticipated.
14.e.
No. The project will cause increased traffic on city streets; however, this is not
considered a significant impact (refer W No. 13).
14.f.
Ener2v
15.a.b.
Maybe. The future projea residents will be using governmental services such as
libraries; however, a $100.00 per dwelling unit mitigation fee imposed on this project
will mitigate the impact. No significant impacts are anticipated.
No. The implementation of the proposed project would increase the rate of consumption
of fuel and other energy resources. During construction, construction equipment would
be consuming energy resources. At buildout, energy resources would be required during
project operation, such as gasoline, natural gas and electricity. However, the proposed
project would not result in the use of substantial mounts of fuel or energy which are
commercially abundant. No significant impacts are anticipated.
R:~S\STAFFRPT~27314.1ES 2123/93 klb
Utilities
16.a.b.c.
d.e.f.
No, All the utilities and services are within close proximity to the project site and will
be extended to the project site with agreements between the developer and the individual
agencies. No significant impacts are anticipated.
Human Health
17.a.b. No, ..The nature of the proposed uses permitted on the'project Site'is not such that they
would create potential health hazards. No significant impacts are anticipated. "
Aesthetics
18.
Recreation
Maybe. The project will go through further review in terms of architecture and
landscaping when a Plot Plan application is flied. All aesthetics issues will be dealt with
at that stage. At that time close attention shall be given to the impacts, if any, to the
existing single family dwellings to the north of the project site and the existing schools
on the west and east of the site. No significant impacts are anticipated.
19.
Yes. The proposed project will include a private golf course and other active ameni~es.
A senior center may also be a part of this project which will create new activities for the
residents. These impacts are considered positive and will not cause significant negative
impacts.
Cultural Resources
20.a.b.c.d.
No. The proposed project will not have a significant impact on prehistoric or historic
cultural resources according to the University of California Eastern Information Center.
This conclusion was made upon completion of a Phase I study. A condition will be
imposed on the project to have a qualified archaeologist present at the time of grading
as required by the Eastern Information Center. '.
R:\S\STAFFRPT~27314.1ES 2/23/93 klb
ENVI~O~AL DETERMINATION
On the basis ~f this initial evaluation:
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significsnt
effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be
prepared.
· I fin_d that although the proposed'project could have 'a signi-
ticant effect on the environment, there will not be a signi-
ticant effect on this case because the mitigation measures
described 0n attached sheets and in the Conditiom of Approval
have been added to the project.
A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED.
I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on
the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is
required.
X
February 2. 1993
Date
For
C1TYOFTEMECULA
R:\S%STAFFRPT%27314.1ES 2/24/93 Idb ~-,.
ATTACHMENT NO. 5
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
R:~S~r~314.pC 2J24/93 IrJb 34
RECORDED AT THE REQUEST OF
City Clerk
City of Temecula
WHEN RECORDED RETUIN TO
City Clerk
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
DEVELOPMENT A~puuwuqT.
B~'t~asamd
CITY OF TBMBC'T, ak
TNle LINFIELD SCHOOL
R:~\STAF~D.DA 2/23/93 Ir. Jb -1-
DEVELOPMgNT
CITY OF
and
TR~ L:IIYFIF, LD'SClIOOL
This Development Agreement ("Agreement,) is entered
into to be effective on the date it is recorded with the
Riverside County Recorder (the ,Effective Date") by and among the'
City of Temecula, a California municipal' corporation ('"City") and
the persons and entities listed below ("Owner"):
THE LINFIELD SCHOOL
A. The legislature of the State of California has
adopted California Government Code Section 65864-65869.5
("Development Agreement Legislation") which authorizes a city to
enter into a binding develo~nent agreement with persons having
legal or equitable interests in real property located within a
city's municipal boundaries for the development of such
property.
B. Pursuant and subject to the Development Agreement
Legislation, the City's police powers and City Resolution No.
91-52, City is authorized to enter into binding agreements with
persons having legal or equitable interest in 'real property
located within the City's municipal boundaries under which such
property my be developed in the City.
C. In lieu of obtaining approval of a Specific Plan
for the development of the Property, Owner has requested City to
consider entering into a development agreement relating to the
Property.
D. By electing to enter into this Agreement, City
.shall bind future members of the City Council of City by the
obligations specified herein and further limit the future.
exercise of certain governmental.and proprietary powers of and
members of the City Council.
E. The terms and conditions of this Agreement have
undergone extensive review by the staff of the City and the City
Council of City and have been found to be fair, just and
reasonable.
F. City finds and determines that it will be in the
best interests of its citizens and the public health, safety and
welfare will be served by entering into this Agreement.
G. All of the procedures of the California
Environmental Quality Act have been met with respect to this
Agreement.
H. City was incorporated on December 1, 1989.
Pursuant to California Government Code Sections 65360 and 65361,
the City has forty-two (42) months following incorporation to
prepare and adopt a general plan. During this 42-month period,
the City may approve development projects without being subject'
to the requirement that its decisions be consistent with the
R:~AFFRFI'daNF~/~.DA 2/23~ ~ - 2 -
general plan so long as the findings set forth in Section 65360
and the conditions of approval of the California Office Of
Planning.and Research are met.
I. Pursuant to City Ordinance No. 90-4, the City has
adopted the County of Riverside's land use, subdivision and
mitigation fee ordinances as amended by City Ordinance Nos. 90-05
through 92-15. Pursuant to City Resolution No. 90-31, the City
has adopted the Riverside County Southwest Area Conmmnity Plan
("SWAP"), as a planning guideline during the preparation of the
City's General Plan.
J. The .City Council'of 'City hereby finds and
determines that:
(1) The City is proceeding in a timely fashion
with the preparation of its general plan.
(2) There is a reasonable probability that the
Project will be consistent with the draft
general plan proposal presently being
considered.
(3} There is little or no probability of
substantial detriment to or interference with
the future adopted general plan if the
Project is ultimately inconsistent with the
plan.
(4) The Project complies with all other
applicable requirements of state law and
local ordinances.
K. Owner is the fee owner of a ninety-six and nine-
tenths (96.9) acre parcel of undeveloped land located South of
Rancho Vista Road, east of Temecula Valley High School and north
of Pauba Road, hereinafter referred to as the "Property,, as
described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part herein
by this reference. This Agreement applies. to the development of
a forty-eight and three-tenths (48.3) acre portion of the
Property, comprised of Lots 1-4 of Tentative Parcel Map No.
27314.
L. City and Owner desire. that the Property be
developed as a Senior Citizen Housing Development. as further
described herein.
M. The City Council of C~ty hereby finds and
determines that:
(1) The environmental impacts of this Agreement
have been reviewed and all measures deemed feasible to
mitigate adverse impacts thereof have been incorporated into
the City approvals for the Project.
(2) No other mitigation measures for
environmental impacts created by the Project, as presently
approved shall be required for development of the Project
unless mandated by law.
(3) City my, pursuant to and in accordance with
its rules, regulations, and ordinances, conduct an
environmental review of subsequent discretionary
entitlements for the development of the Property or any
changes, amendments, or modifications to the Property. The
City, as a result of such review, may impose additional
measures (or conditions) to mitigate as permitted by law the
R:~STA~H~.DA 2/231~ ~ -3-
adverse environmental impacts of such development
entitlement which were not considered or mitigated at the
time of approval of the Project.
(4) Should the Owner propose more than 240
dwelling units for parcel 2 of the property then the
.environmental impacts of those additional units shall be
evaluated, and the City may condition the project as necessary to
mitigate such additional units.
N. Within forty-eight (48) hours of the effective
date of this Agreement, Owner shall deliver to .the Planning
department a check.payable to the County'Clerk in the amount of.
One Thousand Two Hundred Seventy-Five Dollars (1,300.00), which
includes the One Thousand Two Hundred Fifty Dollars ($1,250.00)
fee required by Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(d)(2) plus the
Twenty-Five Dollar ($50.00) County administrative fee to enable
the City to file the Notice of Determination required under
Public Resources Code Section 21152 and 14 Cal. Code of
Regulations 15075. If within such forty-eight (48) hour period
the Owner 'has not delivered to the Planning Department the check
required above, this Agreement shall be void by reason of failure
of condition, Fish and GamelCode Section 711.4(c).
O. City Council of City has approved this Agreement
by Ordinance No. adopted on 1993 and effective
on , 1993. ' '
'NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the above Recitals
and of the mutual covenants hereinafter contained and for other
good' and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of
which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree:
1. Definitions. In this Agreement, unless the
context otherwise requires:
(a) "Congregate Care.Facility. is a congregate
care residential facility developed pursuant to Riverside County
Ordinance No. 460, and Sections 8.1, 8.2, 19.101, 19.102 and
19.103 of Riverside County Ordinance No. 348.
(b) "City".is the City of Temecula.
(c) "Development Approvals"'means all those
discretionary land use entitlements necessary to develop the
Property, including, but not limited-to, zoning changes,
tentative subdivision maps, plot plans and conditional use
permits. '
(d) "Development Exaction" means any requirement
of City in connection with or pursuant to any Land Use Regulation
or Development Approval for the dedication of land, the
construction of improvements or public facilities, or the payment
of fees in order to lessen, offset, mitigate or compensate for
the impacts of development on the environment or other public
interests.
(e) "Development Plan" means the development of
the Property as depicted in Exhibit G.
(f) "Existing Development Approvals. means those
certain Development Approvals in effect as of the effective date
of this Agreement with respect to the Property, including,
R:~q~TAFI:~.DA 2/23/93 klb -4-
without limitation, the ~Existing Development Approvals. listed
in Exhibit B which were approved by the City of Temecula.
(g) "Land Use Regulations. means all ordinances,
resoluti&ns, codes, rules, regulations and official policies of
City, governing the development and use of land including without
limitation, the permitted use of land, the density or intensity
of use, subdivision requirements, the maximum height and size of
proposed buildings, the provisions for reservation or dedication
of land for public purposes, and the design, improvement and
construction standards and specifications applicable to the
development of the'Property which are a matter of public record
on the Effective Date of this Agreement. "Land Use Regulations.
does not include any County or City ordinance, resolution, code.
rule, regulation, or official policy, governing:
(1) The conduct of businesses, professions,
and occupations;
(2) Taxes and assessments;
(3) The control and abatement of nuisances;
(4) The granting of encroachment permits and
the conveyance of rights and interests which provide for the
use of or the entry upon public property;
(5) The exercise of the power of eminent
domain.
(h) "Senior Citizen Housing Development. means a
multi-family development intended for persons 55 years of age or
older, as further defined at California Civil Code Section 51.3.
(i) "Subsequent Development Approvals" means all
Development Approvals required subsequent to the Effective Date
in connection with development of the Property.
(j) "Project" is the development of the Property
with the following specific uses: (i) multifamily senior housing
complex; (ii) congregate care facility; (iii) skilled nursing
facility; (iv) personal care facility, and (v) Seniors' Community
Center; and (vi) a nine (9) hole private golf course.
(k) "Owner. means the person having a legal
interest in the Property;
(1) "Subsequent Land Use Regulation,, means any
Land Use Regulation adopted and effective-after the Effective
Date of this Agreement.
(m) "Property" is the real property referred to
in Exhibit "A".
2. Interest of Owner. Owner represents that he has a
legal interest in the Property and that all other persons holding
legal or equitable interests in the Property are to be bound by
this Agreement.
3. Exhibits. The following documents are referred to
in this Agreement, attached hereto and made a part hereof by this
reference:
R:\S~qTAFFRFI~LENFIBLD.DA 2/23/93 k]b -5-
Exhibit
Designation Description
Legal Description of the
Property
Referred to
in Paragraa3h
K
B
Existing Development
Approvals
1 (f), 15.2
C Development Schedule.. 9~ 10
D Public Facility Fee 14..2.
Agreement.
E Fee Credit 14.3
F Deed Restriction 10
G Development Plan 9
(a) The term of this Agreement shall commence on
· the Effective Date and shall extend for a period of ten (10)
years thereafter, unless this Agreement is terminated, modified
or extended by circumstances set forth in this Agreement or by
mutual consent of the parties hereto.
(b) Should the Owner: ('i)' fail to obtain all
Subsequent Development Approvals to develop and complete the
Project, or (ii) breach the Development Schedule, Owner agrees to
City amending the land use designation to Low Medium Density
Residential or Public Institutional, and amending the zoning to
Single Family Residential (R-l) or Public Institutional.
(c) Notwithstanding any other provisions of this
Agreement, upon the sale or lease of any lot, dwelling or unit to
a member of the public or other ultimate user, this Agreement
shall terminate with respect to .any such lot, dwelling, unit or
space, and such lot, dwelling, unit or space 'shall be released
and no longer be subject to this Agreement without the execution
or recordation of any further document upon satisfaction of both
of the following conditions:
(1) The lot has been finally subdivided and
individually (and not in "bulk") sold or leased to a member
of the public or other ultimate user; and,
(2) A Certificate of Occupancy has been
issued for a building or the lot, and the fees set forth
under Section 14 of this Agreement have been paid.
Notwithstanding the sale of any individual lot,
dwelling, unit or space as set forth herein, the Owner shall
remain liable to perform any and all outstanding obligations,
still unperformed or uncompleted at the time of sale, with
respect to said lot, dwelling, unit or space required by this
Agreement or as a condition of any development approval. The
Owner shall condition the sale and deed sufficiently to ensure
the completion of said obligations.' '
R:~S'~fAFFP'PT~-!-D.DA 2/23/93 klb ' 6-
5. Amsi~ent.
5.1 Right to Assign. The Owner shall have the
right to.sell, transfer, or assign the Property in whole or in
part (provided that no such partial transfer shall violate the
Subdivision Map Act, Government Code Section 66410, et seq,, or
-Riverside County Ordinance No. 460, as the same was incorporated
by reference into the Temecula Municipal Code by Ordinance No.
90-04) to. any person, partnership, joint venture, fi~.L, or
corporation at any time during the term of this Agreement;
provided, however, that any such'sale, transfer, or assignment
shall include.the assignment and.assumption of the rights,
duties, and obligations arising under or from this Agreement and
be made in strict compliance with the following conditions
precedent:
(a) No sale, transfer, or assignment of any
right or interest under this Agreement shall be made unless
made together with the sale, transfer, or assignment of all
or a part of the Property.
(b) Concurrent with any such sale, transfer
or assignment, or within fifteen (15) business days
thereafter, the Owner shall notify City,. in writing, of such
sale, transfer, or assignment and shall provide City with an
executed agreement, in a form acceptable to the City
Attorney, by the purchaser, transferee, or assignee and
providing therein that.the purchaser, transferee, or
assignee expressly and unconditionally assumes all the
duties and obligations of the Owner under this Agreement.
Any sale, transfer, or assignment not made in strict
compliance with the foregoing conditions shall constitute a
default by the Owner under this Agreement. Notwithstanding the
failure of any purchaser, transferee, or assignee to execute the
agreement required by Paragraph (b) of this Subsection, the
burdens of this Agreement shall be binding upon such purchaser,
transferee, or assignee, but the benefits of this Agreement shall
not inure to such purchaser, transferee, or assignee until and
unless such agreement is executed.
5.2 Release of Transferring Owner.
Notwithstanding any sale, transfer, or assignment, a transferring
Owner shall continue to be obligated-under this Agreement unless
such transferring Owner is given a release in writing by City,
which release shall be provided by City upon the full
satisfaction by such transferring Owner of all of the following
conditions:
(a) The Owner no longer has a legal or
equitable interest in all or any part of the Property except
as a beneficiary under a deed of trust.
(b) The Owner is not then in default under
this Agreement.
(c) The Owner has provided City with the
notice and executed agreement required under Paragraph (b)
of Subsection 5.1 above.
(d) The purchaser, transferee, or assignee
provides City with security equivalent to any security
previously provided'by Owner to secure performance of its
obligations hereunder.
R:~SLqTAF~D.DA 2/23/93 klb -7-
5.3 Subsequent Assignment. Any subsequent sale,
transfer, or assignment after an initial sale, transfer,. or
assignment shall be made only in accordance with and subject to
the terms and conditions of this Section.
.that this ~'reemM°rtga~ee PTotect.~on. The parties hereto agree
or any portion Uhereof or any improvemenU Uhereon by any
mortgage, deed of trust, or other security device securing
financing with.respect to'the Property. City acknowledges that
the lenders providing such financing ma~ require certain
Agreement interloretat~ons andsagrees upon request, from time to
time, to meet with the Owner and representatives of such lenders
to negotiate in good faith any such request for interpretation.
City will not unreasonably withhold its consent to any such
requested interpretation provided such interpretation is
consistent with the intent and purposes of this Agreement. Owner
shall reimburse City for any and all of City's costs associated
with said interpretations and shall make reimbursement payments
to City within thirty (30) days of receipt of an invoice from
City.
Any Mortgagee of the Property shall be entitled to the
following rights and privileges:
(a) Neither entering into this Agreement nor a
breach of this Agreement shall defeat, render invalid, diminish
or impair the lien of any mortgage on the Property made in good
faith and for value, unless otherwise required by law.
(b) The Mortgagee of any mortgage or deed of
trust encumbering the Property,. or any part thereof, which
Mortgagee has submitted a request in writing to the City in the
manner specified herein for giving notices, shall be entitled to
receive written notification from City of any default by the
Owner in the performance of the 0wner's obligations under this
Agreement.
(c} If City timely' receives a request from a
Mortgagee requesting a copy of any.notice of default given to the
Owner under the terms of 'this Agreement, City shall provide a
copy of that notice to the Mortgagee within ten (10) days of
sending the notice of default to the-Owner. The Mortgagee shall
have the right, but not the obligation, to cure the default
during the remaining cure period allowed such party under this
Agreement.
(d) Any Mortgagee who comes into possession of
the Property, or any part thereof, pursuant to foreclosure of the
mortgage or deed of trust, or deed in lieu of such foreclosure,
shall take the Property, or part thereof, subject to the terms of
this Agreement. Notwithstanding any other provision of this
Agreement to the contrary, no Mortgagee shall have an obligation
or duty under this Agreement to perform any of the Owner's
obligations or other affirmative covenants of the Owner
hereunder, or to guarantee such performance, provided however,
that to the extent that any covenant to be performed by Owner is
a condition precedent to the performance of a covenant by City,
the performance thereof shall continue to be a condition
precedent to City's Performance.hereunder, and further provided
R:~S'~rAF~INFIILD.DA 2/23/93 klb
-8-
that any sale, transfer or assignment by any Mortgagee in
possession shall be subject to the provisions of Section 6 3 of
this Agreement. ' '
(e) Any Mortgagee who comes into possession of
the Property, or any portion thereof, pursuant to subsection (d)
above and who elects not to assume the obligations of the Owner
set forth herein shall not be entitled to any rights to develop
which have or may have vested as a result of this Agreement.
7. Binding Effect of Agreement. The burdens of this
Agreement bind and the benefits of the Agreement ~nure to'.the
successors-in~interest to the parties to its.
8. Relationehip of Parties. It is undersEood that
the contractual relationship between City and Owner is such that
the Owner is an independent contractor and not the agent of City.
9. Proiect Zoning. Pursuant to the Existing
Development Approvals, the Project description contained at
Section 16..1 of 'this Agreement, and the Development Plan, the
Property has been rezoned from Rural-Residential (R-R) to General
Residential (R-3) to permit Project development. The land use
designation under the City's Draft General Plan is Public
Institutional and High Density Residential. The rezoning and
'proposed land use designation'is conditional upon the completion
of the Project pursuant to the Development Schedule. Any
substantial breach of..the Existing Development Approvals,
Development Schedule or Development Plan shall constitute a
material breach of the Agreement.
10. Development Schedule.
(a) Owner shall develop the Property pursuant to
the Development Schedule contained in Exhibit C.
(b) Concurrently with recording Parcel Map No.
27314, Owner shall record a deed restriction in substantially the
form of Exhibit F, as to Parcels 1-4 of said Tract, restricting
occupancy in the Project to persons fifty-five (55) years of age
and older.
(c) The parties acknowledge that Owner cannot
this time predict when, or the rate at which phases of. the
Property will be developed. Such decisions"depend upon numerous
factors which are not within the.control of Owner, such as market
orientation and demand, interest rates, absorption, completion
and other similar factors. Since the California Supreme Court
held in Pardee Construction Co. v. City of Camarillo, 37 Cal. 3d
465 (1984), that the failure of the parties therein to provide
for the timing of development resulted in a later adopted
initiative restricting the timing of-development to prevail over
such parties, agreement, it.is the parties, intent to cure that
deficiency by acknowledging and providing that the Owner shall
have the right to develop the Property in such order and at such
rate and at such times as the Owner deems appropriate within the
exercise of its subjective business judgment, subject only to any
timing or phasing requirements set forth in the Development
Schedule.
11. Hold Harmless. Owner agrees to and shall hold
City, its officers, agents, employees and representatives
harmless from liability for damage or claims for damage for '-
personal injury including death and claims for property damage
R:~S~STAFFRPT~L~ELD.DA 2/23~ ~ '- -9-
which may arise from the direct or indirect operations of the
Owner or those of his contractor, subcontractor, agent, employee
or other.person acting on. his behalf which relate to the Project~
Owner agrees to and shall indemnify,
defend, and hold harmless
the City and its officers, agents, employees and representatives
from actions for damages caused or alleged to have been caused by
reason of 0wner's activities in connection with the Project.
This hold harmless agreement applies to all damages and
claims for damages suffered or alleged tohave been suffered by
reason of the operations referred to in this paragraph,
regardless of whether or not City prepared, supplied, or approved
plans or specifications or both for the Project and regardless of
whether or not the insurance policies referred to herein are
applicable.
Owner further agrees to indemnify, hold harmless, pay
all costs and provide a defense for City in any action
challenging the validity of this Agreement or the Project.
12. L.~tigation.
12.1 Th.~rd Party Litigation Concerning A~reem~nt.
Owner shall defend, at its expense, including attorneys fees,
indemnify, and hold harmless City, its agents, officers' and
employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against City, its
agents officers or 1
, , emp oyees to attack, set aside, void, or
annul the approval of this Agreement or the approval of any
permit granted pursuant to this Agreement. .City shall promptly
notify Owner of any such claim, action, or proceeding, and City
shall cooperate in the defense. If City fails to promptly notify
Owner of any such claim, action, or proceeding, or if City fails
to cooperate in the defense, Owner shall not thereafter be
responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless City. City
may in its discretion participate in the defense of any such
claim, action, or proceeding.
12.2 Environmental Assurances. Owner shall
indemnify and hold City, its officers, agents, and employees free
and harmless from any liability, based or asserted, upon any act
or omission of Owner, its officers~ agents, employees,
subcontractors, Predecessors-in-interest, successors, assigns ~nd
independent contractors for any violation of'any federal, state,
or local law, ordinance or regulation-relating to industrial
hygiene, solid or hazardous waste or to environmental conditions
on, under or about the Property. Said violations shall include,
but not limited to, soil and groundwater conditions, and Owner
shall defend, at its expense, including attorneys fees, City, its
officers, agents and employees in any action based or asserted
upon any such alleged act or omission. City may, in its
discretion, Participate in the defense of any such action.
13. Third Party Litigation Concerning the General
Plan. City is a newly incorporated city falling within the scope
of Government Code Sections 65360 .and 65311 and thus not subject
to the requirement that a General Plan be adopted or that
development decisions
be consistent therewith so long as the City
makes certain findings, which the City has made at Section J. of
this Agreement. Notwithstanding these findings City shall have
no liability in damages under this Agreement for any failure of-
City to perform under this Agreement or the inability of Owner to
R:~AFFRPT~rFIELD.DA 2~ ~ - 10 -
develop the Property as Contemplated by the Development Plan of
this Agreement as the result of a judicial determination that on
the Effective Date, or at any time thereafter, the findings made
under Section 65360 and 65361 or the future General Plan, are
invalidated or inadequate or not in compliance with law.
14. Public Benefits. Public Improvements and
Facilities.
14.1 Intent. The parties acknowledge and agree
that development of the Property will result in substantial
public needs which will not be fully. met by'development of the
Project and further acknowledge and agree that this Agreement
confers substantial private benefits on the Owner which should be
balanced by commensurate public benefits. Accordingly, the
parties intend to provide consideration to the public to balance
the private benefits conferred on the Owner by providing more
fully for the satisfaction of the public needs resulting from the
Project.
14.2 Impact Fee..
(a) The developer(s) of the Property shall pay a
capital or impact fee for road improvements and public facilities
the City may adopt for development ("Public Facilities Fee"), in
the amount in .effect at the time of payment of the fee. (The
term "developer(s) of the Property or Project" as used in this
Section shall mean the person(s) who seeks a building permit to
construct structures on the Property. These individuals shall
hereinafter be referred to as the "Developer..) If an interim or
final public facility mitigation fee or benefit district has not
been finally established by the date on which Developer requests
its building permits for the Project or any phase thereof, the
Developer shall execute an Agreement for Payment of a Public
Facility Fee, in substantially the form of Exhibit D.
(b) Owner shall pay all other impact fees
provided for under the Land Use Regulations, including, but not
limited to the Residential Impact Fee (pursuant to Riverside
County Ordinance No. 659) and Flood Control, Fire, Library,
Traffic Mitigation and K-Rat Fees.
14.3 Fee Credits and Schedule'. In exchange for
the dedication of' land, the construction of improvements and the
payment of fees, Owner shall be entitled to Fee Credits set forth
in Exhibit E.
14.4 Waiver. By execution of this Agreement,
Owner waives any right to object to the imposition of the
provisions of Section 15 of this Agreement, the adoption of any
interim or final Public Facility Fee, or the process, levy, or
collection of any interim or final Public Facility Fee for this
Project; provided that Owner is not waiving its right to protest
the reasonableness of any interim or final Public Facility Fee,
and the amount thereof.
15. Reservations of Authority.
15.1 Limitations. Reservations. and Exceptions.
Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, the
following Subsequent Land Use Regulations shall apply to .the
development of the Property, including, but not limited to:
R:~qTAFFRPT~.DA 2fZ3/93 kab - 11 -
15.2 SubAe~uent Development Approvals. This
Agreement shall not preveat City, in acting on Subsequent
Development Approvals from applying Subsequent Land Use
Regulations, even if they conflict with the Existing Land Use
Regulations, Existing Development Approvals or the Development
Plan. Further, this Agreement shall not prevent City from denying
or conditionally approving any Subsequent Development Approval on
the basis of the Existing or Subsequent Land Use Regulations.
15.3 Modification or Suspension by State or"
Federal Law. In the event that State or Federal laws or
regulations enacted after the Effective Date of this Agreement
prevent or preclude compliance with one or more of the provisions
of this Agreement, such provisions of this Agreement shall be
modified or suspended as may be necessary to comply with such
State or Federal laws or regulations, provided, however, that
this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect to the
extent it is not inconSistent.with such laws or regulations and
to the extent such laws' or regulations do not render such
remaining provisions impractical to enforce.
15.4 Regulation by Other Public Agencies. It is
acknowledged by the parties that other public agencies not within
the control of City possess authority to.regulate aspects-of the
development of the Property separately from or jointly with City
and this Agreement does not limit the authority of such other
public agencies.
15.5 Vesting Tentative Maps. If any tentative or
final subdivision map, or tentative or .final parcel map,
heretofore or hereafter approved in connection with development
of the Property, is a vesting map under the Subdivision Map Act
(Government Code Section 66410, e~ sea.) and Riverside County
Ordinance No. 460, as the same was indorporated by reference into
the Temecula Municipal Code by Ordinance No. 90-04, and if this
Agreement is determined by a final judgment to be invalid or
unenforceable insofar as it grants a vested right to develop to
the Owner, then and to that extent the rights, obligations, and
protections afforded the Owner and City respectively, under the
laws and ordinances applicable to vesting maps shall supersede
the provisions of this Agreement. Except as set forth
immediately above, development of the Property shall occur only
as provided in this Agreement, and the provisions in this
R:~TAF~t~T~L~VF~LD-DA 2~ ~ -12-
(a) Processing fees and charges imposed by
City to cover the estimated actual costs to City of
processing applications for Development Approvals or for
monitoring compliance with any Development Approvals granted
or issued.
(b) Procedural regulations relating to
hearing bodies, petitions, applications, notices, findings,
records, hearings,~reports, recommendation, appeals, and any
other matter of procedure.
~ (c) Regulations governing construction
s~andards and specifications. includ£ng, without limitation,
the City's Building Code, Plumbing Code, Mechanical Code,
Electrical Code, Grading Code and Fire Code.
(d)~ Subsequent Land Use Regulations w~ich
are not in conflict with the Project.
Agreement shall be controlling over any conflicting provision of
law or ordinance concerning vesting maps.
16. Development of the Property.
'. 16.1 Project. The Property shall be developed
with the following uses, and only the following uses:
(a) Senior Citizen Housing Development on
Parcel 2 of Parcel Map 27314, up to 20 dwelling units per
net acre with a target density of 10 dwelling units per
acre;
(b) Nine (9) hole private.golf course for
the sole use of'private residents on Parcel'2 of Parcel Map
27314; '
(c) Senior's Co~unity Center with a minimum
of 3,500 square feet on Parcel I of the Parcel Map 27314;
(d) Congregate Care Facility on Parcel 3 of
Parcel Map 27314; and
(e) Skilled Nursing and Personal Care
Facilities on Parcel 4 of Parcel Map 27314.
No change, modification, revision or alteration of
these uses or of the Project may be made without the prior
amendment of this Agreement.
16.2 Rights to Develop. The permitted uses of the
Property, the density and intensity of use, the maximumheight
and size of proposed buildings, and provisions for reservation
and dedication of land for public purposes shall be those set
forth in Section 16.1 and the Development Plan.. The Project
shall remain subject to all Subsequent Development Approvals
required to complete the Project as contemplated by the
Development Plan.
16.3 Changes and Amendments. Notwithstanding
Section 16.1, the parties acknowledge that refinement and further
development of the Project will require Subsequent Development
Approvals and may demonstrate that. changes are appropriate and
mutually desirable in the Project. In the event the Owner finds
that a change in the Project is necessary or appropriate, the
Owner shall apply for a Subsequent Development Approval to'
effectuate such change and. City shall process and act on such"
application in accordance with the Subsequent Land Use
Regulations. If approved, any such change in the Project shall
be incorporated herein as an addendum to this Agreement and may
be further changed from time to time as provided in this Section.
Unless otherwise required by law, as determined in City's
reasonable discretion, a change to the Project shall be deemed
"minor" and not require an amendment. to this Agreement provided
such change does-not:
(a) Alter the permitted uses of the Proj.ect
as a whole; or,
(b) Increase the density or intensity of use
of the Project as a whole; or,
(c) Increase the maximum height and size of'
permitted buildings; or,
(d)- Delete a requirement for the reservation
or dedication of land for public purposes within the Project
as a whole; or,
R:~S~STA~.DA 2/'23/93 Irab -13-
(e) Constitute a project requiring a
Subsequent or Supplemental Environmental Impact RepOrt
pursuant to Section 21166 of the Public Resources Code.
17. Periodic Review of ConniVance w~thAgreement.
(a) Pursuant to City Resolution No. 91-52, as it
.may be subsequently amended, City shall review this Agreement at
least once during every twelve (12) month period from the date
this Agreement is executed. The Owner or successor shall
reimburse City for the actual and necessary costs of this review.
.(b) During each.periodic review.by City, the
Owner is required to'demonstrate good faith-compliance.with the
terms of the Agreement. The Owner agrees to furnish such
evidence of good faith compliance as City in the exercise of its
discretion may require.
18. Amendment or Cancellation of Agreement. This
Agreement may be amended or canceled in whole or in part only by
mutual consent of the parties and 'in the manner provided for in
Government Code Sections 65868, 65867 and 65867.5. If the
Amendment is requested by the Owner or successor, the
Owner/successor agrees to pay City any Development Agreement
Amendment fee then in existence as established by City COuncil
'Resolution, or if no such fee'is established, to reimburse City
for the actual and necessary costs of reviewing and processing
said Amendment.
19. Breach of Agreement.
(a) The City reserves the right to terminate this
Agreement in the event of a material breach of any of its
material terms or any material term of any applicable federal,
state or local statute or regulation, which breach is not cured
following written notice and a reasonable opportunity to cure.
In finding such a breach:
(i) City does not waive any claim of defect
in performance by Owner implied if on periodic review the City
does not propose to modify or terminate the Agreement.
(ii) Non-performance shall not be excused
because of a failure of a third person~ and
(iii) Non-performance shall be excused only
when it is prevented or delayed by acts of. God or an emergency
declared by the Governor.
(b) The notice to cure period shall be thirty
(30) days (except in cases of emergency where a shorter time may
be prescribed consistent with the nature o~ the emergency).
Where thirty (30) days is insufficient time for the Owner to cure
the notified breach, Owner shall be deemed in compliance with the
provisions if, within that thirty-day time period Owner begins
good faith efforts to cure such breach and shall present a
specific and reasonable timetable to the City for the cure of the
notified breach. If the breach is not cured within such time
period or within such additional time period specified in such
notice, the Planning Director shall cause to be noticed a public
hearing before the City Council.
(c) The Council shall hold a public hearing, upon
ten (10) days written notice duly given to Owner and published
notice provided to the public.. Owner may appear at the public
hearing before the Council and present information, orally or in
R:~TAFFRPT~.DA 2/23~ ~ -14-
documented form, that it deems relevan~ and appropriate to the
Council's deliberations. Based on the evidence presented at the
public hearing, the Council shall determine by resolution whether
the Agreement should be terminated. Nothing herein is intended
to limit Council's right to make other determinations which are
reasonably related to the Agreement.
(d) The City Council shall cause Owner to receive
written notice of any action taken following the public hearing.
(e) Within not less than thirty (30) days of
receiving notice of the City Council's action, Owner. shall be
entitled to initiate an action in scare court to seek judicial
review pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure..Section
1094.5. In the event Owner initiates such a review, the
Council's determination shall be stayed pending a final order of
the court.
(f) Upon a finding of material breach of this
Agreement,~ and the failure of Owner to. successfully challenge the
same in a court of law, City may not only terminate this
Agreement, but also shall amend the land use designation of the
Property to Institutional or Low-MediumDensity Residential, and
lamend the zoning to Single Family Residential (R-l); Owner
further agrees to such amendments.
(g) All other remedies at law or in equity which
are not otherwise provided for in the Agreement or in.City's
regulations governing development agreements are available to the
parties to pursue in the event there is a breach.
20. Damages Upon Termination. It is acknowledged by
the parties that City would not have entered into this Aqreement
if it were to be liable in damages under or with respect'to this
Agreement or the application thereof.
In general, each of the parties hereto may pursue
any remedy at law or equity available for the breach of any
provision of this Agreement, except that City, and its officers,
employees and agents, shall not be liable in damages to Owner or
to any assignee, transferee of Owner, or any other person, and
Owner covenants not to sue for or claim any damages for breach of
that Agreement by City. '
2i. Attorneys' Fees~and Costs.' If'fegal action by
either party is brought because of breach of this Agreement or to
enforce a provision of this Agreement, the prevailing party is
entitled to reasonable attorneys fees and court costs.
22. Notices. All notices required or provided for
under this Agreement shall be in writing and delivered in person
or sent by certified mail, postage prepaid. Notice required to
be given to City shall be addressed as follows:
To City: City Clerk
City of Temecula
43172 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92390
R:~qTA~HqF~,LD.DA 2/23/93 klb -15-
Notices required to be given to Owner shall be addressed as
follows:
.To Owner:
A party may Change .the address by giving nOtice'in writing to the
other party and thereafter notices shall be.addressed and
transmitted to the new address.
23. Rule. of Construction ana M~scellaneo,,s Terms.
(a) The singular includes the plural; the
masculine gender includes the feminine; "shall" is mandatory,
"may" is permissive.
(b) If a part of this Agreement is held to be
invalid, the remainder of the Agreement is not'affected.
(c) If there is more than one signer of this
Agreement their obligations are joint and several.
(d) The time limits set forth in this Agreement
may be extended by mutual written consent of the parties in
accordance with the procedures for adoption of the Agreement.
(e) This Agreement is made and entered into for
the soleprotection and benefit of the parties and their
successors and assigns. No other person, including but not
limited to third party beneficiaries, shall have any right of
action based upon any provision of this Agreement.
(f) This Agreement may be executed by the parties
in counterparts, each of which so fully executed counterpart
shall be deemed an original irrespective of the date of
execution.
24. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in
any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an
original, but all of which when taken together shall constitute
one and the same instrument.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF this Agreement has been executed by
the parties on the day and year first above written.
Attest:
By:
MAYOR
City Clerk
R:~S~TAP'FItF~L~tI~.DA 2/23/93 kib ' 16-
Approved as to form:
City Attorney
By:-
Name:
Title:
OWNER ·
By:
Name:
Title:
Notary
[ALL SIGNATURES SHALL BE ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE A NOTARY PUBLIC.
EXECUTION ON BEHALF OF ANY CORPORATION SHALL BE BY TWO CORPORATE
OFFICERS.]
R:~STA~INFIMLD.DA 2a3/~3~ klb -17-
~Z!?rTa'r~ mXm
DESC~.IPTION OF ~ PIOPERTY
BEING A PORTION OF THE RANCHO TEMECULA, AS GRANTED BY U.S. GOV'T
TO LUIS VIGNES BY PATENT DATED 1-18-1860, AS SHOWN BY LIBER 1
PAGE 37; REC'S OF SAN DIEGO CO., AN PARCELS '1,2,3.0F P;M.'.83/97-
100 REC'S RIVERSIDE-C0. LOCATED IN THE CiTY'0F TEMECULA, '
.CALIFORNIA',.
R:\S~STAFFRFTXI.INFILD.DA 2/23/93 Idb - 18 -
~rrlq'lBIT wBm
· XISTING DEVELOPEeWT/WPROVALS
Tentative Parcel Map No. 27314
C~mnge of Zone No. 21
R:~q~TA~w n.DA 2/23/93 kab ' 19 -
Within five (5) years of the effective date. of this
DeVelopment Agreement, Owner shall have substantially
begun construction of each of the following uses:
a. Twenty'(20) dwelling units of the Senior Citizen-
Housing Development, and
The Congregate Care Facility, Skilled Nursing
Facility, or Personal Care Facility
"Substantially begun construction. shall mean obtaining
a building permit and having an approved and inspected
foundation·
Prior to the issuance of the certificate of occupancy
for the first unit of the multi-family senior housing
complex, Owner shall have constructed and obtained a
certificate of occupancy for the Senior Citizen Center,
and shall have completed the Golf Course.
"Completed the Golf Course" shall mean construction and
completion of all structures, six months growth of the
grass and certification of .the course by a Licensed
Landscape Architect.
Within five (5) years of the effective date of this
Development Agreement, Owner shall have recorded Parcel
Map 27314 and have obtained all Subsequent Development
Approvals for the Senior Citizen Housing Development,
the Congregate Care'Facility, the Skilled Nursing
Facility, the Personal Care Facility,. and the Golf
Course.
Within the term of this Development Agreement, Owner
shall have obtained certificates of occupancy for all
buildings identified in the Subsequent Development
Approvals.
R:\S~TAFFR~.DA 2/23/93 IrJb - 2 0 -
R:~-q~STA~.DA 2/23/93 k~ - 2 '] -
Recording requested by, and
When recorded mail
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
Attn: City Clerk
)
)
)
)
).
)
AGREEMENT FOR PAYMENT OF PUBLIC FACILITY FEE
This Agreement is made this day of
by and between the City of Temecula ("City") and
("Developer").
RECITALS
A. Developer is the owner of real property (the
"Property") in the City of Temecula described as follows:
Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by
reference
pursuant to
Developer proposes'to develop the Property
'(the "Project") .
Recording of this Agreement is fee exempt pursuant to Goverkment
Code Section 6103 as it is recorded for the benefit of the City of
Temecula, a public agency.
-1-
sff/llT33't-~GR (IO~G~I)
-. C. City has determined that the Project will impact
traffic and the demand for other public facilities within the
City as identified in .the for
.the Pro~ect~. ~eSe i~ac~s ~st.~e ~itiga~ed ~y.pay'ment of a.fee
for ad~tiona'l road and pt~:~liC ~aci~ty constr~ct~on,. w~ich fee
shall ~e ~dentified as set fo~-~ereinafter.
D. The City proposes to impose a public facility fee
upon new developments within the City in order to construct
additional public facility improvements to serve and benefit new
developments, including the Project. These fees shall be known
as the "Temecula City-wide. Public Facility Fee Program" or
"Public Facility Fee."
E. Condition No. of the Project requires that
Developer execute this Agreement prior to issuance of a building
permit or conditional use permit, or recordation of the final
map, as provided specifically in the conditions of approval.
F. In order for-Developer to proceed without full
payment of the Public Facility Fee in a'timely manner, City and
Developer have determined to enter into this Agreement.
G. The term "public facility" shall refer to public
and municipal infrastructure, suchas roads, highways, flood
control facilities, city hall, police stations, community
centers, theaters, parks and similar public infrastructure.
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows:
1. Public Facility Fee:
(a) The City Council will establish the amount of
the Public Facility Fee at some time in the future. The Fee will
be based upon the square footage of each development, the vehicle
trips generated by each development, or similar measure(s). The
Public Facility Fee also shall establish the sp&cifiC improve-,
ments to be constructed and their cost, the benefit assessment
area and the method by which ~he fair share, pro-rata obligations
of each property are to be established based on impact on traffic
and demand for .public facilities.
(b) Developer shall pay the Public Facility Fee
on each building at such time it receives its certificate of
occupancy or final inspection, which ever occurs first.
(c) The Council also may establish an Interim
Public Facility Fee to be followed by a Final Public Facility
Fee. If only the Interim Public Facility Fee'has been
established at the time the Developer seeks issuance of its
certificate of occupancy or final inspection, whichever occurs
first, then Developer shall pay the Interim Fee prior ~o issuance
of the certificate of occupancy or-final inspection, whichever
occurs first. Later, when the Final Public Facility Fee i~
established, the Developer will be reimbursed for any difference
between the Interim and Final Fee if the Interim Fee exceeds ~he
Final Fee, and shall pay the shortfall if the Final Fee exceeds
the Interim Fee.
sff/l17333.AOR
.. (d) If the certificate of occupancy or final
inspection occurs prior to the establishment of the Interim or
Final Public Facility Fee, then the Developer shall pay a deposit
of Two Dollars ($2.00) per square foot, not to exceed Ten
Thousand Dollars ($10,000) prior to the issuance of the
certificate of occupancy or final inspection. The' deposit shall
be a credit egainst the Interim or Final Public Facility Fee. A
letter of credit or certificate of-deposit may be provided in
lieu of the deposit.
(e) If either the Final or Interim Public
Facility Fee is established after the issuance ~of the certificate
of occupancy or final inspection, the Developer shall pay the
Interim or Final Public Facility Fee ten (10) days after
receiving notice from the City that it has been established.
(f) Notwithstanding the above, Developer shall
provide City with written notification of the opening of any
escrow for the sale of the Project and shall provide in the
escrow instructions that if the Interim Or Final Public FaCility
Fee has been established, the Fee'shall be paid to the City from
the sale proceeds in escrow prior to distributing the proceeds to
Developer/seller.
(g)
City shall record a release of this Agreement
upon payment of all Public Facility Fees owing and shall provide
Developer with a copy of such release.
aft,'! 17333.AGR (10/'MNgl)
2. Use of Public Fac4].~tv Fee:
The Public Facility Fee collected pursuant to =his
Agreement shall be used only to cons~ruc~c City-wide'traffic and
public facility improvements, which improvements are deemed to be
of benefit tO Project, and for expenses incidental =hereto.
There is a reasonable relationship between the Projec~ and the
Public Facility Fee in that the Project will impact traffic and
existing public facilities, and Consequently, will require
expansion of the City-wide s~reet and highway system, and public
· facilities in order to meet the added demand resulting from the
Project, The a~ount of the Public Facility Fee to be collected
from Project represents the cost of facilities necessary to meet
the incremental increase in traffic and demand for public
facilities resulting from the Project.
3. Information Provided:
Developer shall provide to City, upon City's request
%
therefor, any and all information regarding access to the
Project, %raffic flow, trip generation factors and such other
information as is reasonably necessary to establish the Public
Facility Fee.
4.
Security for Public Fac~!itv Fee:
(a) If the Interim or Final Public Facility Fee
has been established prior to issuance of a building permit or
other entitlement described in Recital E, then, concurrent with
stY~II7333.AGR (10/30/91)
the e~ecu=ion of this Agreement, Developer shall provide an
irrevocable letter of credit or other form of security approved
by City, in a form approved by the City Attorney, in an amount
equal to the to~al Public Facility Fee fox the Project. The
amount of security may be increased upon City's request should
there be an increase in the amount of the Public Facility Fee.
The amount of security also may be reduced upon Developer~s
payment of Public Facility Fees outstanding. However, except for
the deposit provided for in Section 1, no letter of credit is
required if neither the Interim or Final Public Facility Fee has
not been established as of the date of execution of this
Agreement.
(b) As an alternative to collecting the fee from
the letter of credit, if ~he Developer fails to pay the Public
Facility Fee within thil~zy (30) days of the date demand is made,
the City may assess a penalty of ten percent (10%) of the amount
owing and make said Fee,-inclusive of penalty, a lien upon the
described real property bylrecording a no~ice that said Fee is
due under the terms of' this AgreEment with the County Recorder of
Riverside County. The notice shall state the fact that said Fee,
inclusive of penalty, is due under the terms of this Agreement
and shall state the amount, together with the fact that it is
unpaid and draws interest on the Fee and penalty at the rate set
forth at California Revenue & Taxation Section 19269 until paid.
(c) The City may as an alternative to =he lien
procedure set forth above, bring legal action to collect the
Public Facility Fee due. The Developer agrees that.if legal
action by the City is necessary to collect the Fee ~he Developer
agrees to pay the ' City'a reasonable sum' as att0rney~s fees and
court costs, together with penairy and interest determined
according to Paragraph 4 (b) of this Agreement.
5. A~reement Runs With T.mnd:
This Agreement pertains to and'runs with the
Property. This Agreement binds the successors in interest of
each of the parties.
6. Waiver:
By execution of this Agreement, Developer waives
any right to protest the provisions of Condition No. of
the Project, this Agreement, the formation of any Public Facility
fee district, but not the nexus between any Public Facility fee
and the Project.
· 7. Binding Aureement:
This Agreement shall'be binding upon Developer,
Developer,s successors and assigns.
8. Amendment/No Continuing Waiver:
This Agreement may be modified or amended only in
writing, signed by both parties. This Agreement contains the
full and complete understanding of the parties and supersedes any
and'aIR.prior oral or w~itten agreements or representations. A
waiver of any term or condition of ~his Agreement by either par~y
shall not be deemed a continuing Waiver thereof.
9. AttorneVs" Fees:
.Should either party determine that it is necessary
to file a legal action to enforce or interpret the provisions of
this Agreement, the prevailing party in that litigation shall be
entitled to its reasonable costs, including but not limited to
attorneys" fees.
10. Notice:
Notice shall be deemed given under this Agreement
when in writing and deposited in the United States mail, first-
class, postage prepaid, addressed as follows:
CITY: DEVELOPER:
'City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
A=tn: City Clerk
11. Miscellaneous Provisions
(a) If any provision of this Agreement is adjudged
invalid, the remaining provisions shall not be affected.
(b) If there is more than one (1) signer of this
Agreement as Developer, their obligations are joint and several.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties or their duly authorized
representatives have executed this Agreement as of the date set
out above.
CITY. OF TEMECULA
By: By:
David S. Dixon
City Manager
By:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By:
Scot= F. Field
City Attorney
ffr~Z~Z~ m~s
Upon obtaining a certificate of occupancy Owner shall
dedicate to ~he City the Senior Citizen Center
described in Exhibit C. In exchange for dedication of
the Senior Citizen Center and con~letion ofthe Golf
Course, Owner shall receive a lull credit against its
.Quimby Fees required pursuant to Riverside County
Ordinance No. 460.
R:~S'~qTA~T I~.DA 2/23/93 lr. ab
DEED RESTRICTTON
RECORDING REQUESTED BY:
WHEN RECOEDEDMAIL TO:
CITY CLERK
CITY OF TEMECULA
43174 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA 92590
DECLARATION OF REST~[ICTIONS
This DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIONS made this
, 1992, by (.
hereinafter referred to as "Declarant..
.)
day of
WHEREAS, Declarant is the owner of Parcels 1-4 of Parcel Map
No. 27314 (the "Property.); and
WHEREAS, Declarant intends to sell the above described
property, restricting it in accordance with a coh~ton plan
designed to preserve the value and residential qualities of said
land, for the benefit of its future owners.
NOW, THEREFORE, Declarant declares that said real property
shall be held, transferred, encumbered, used, sold, conveyed,
leased, and occupied, subject to the covenants and restrictions
hereinafter set forth expressly and exclusively for the use and
benefit of said property and of each and every person or entity
who now or in the future owns any portion or portions of said
real property.
1'. Land Use and Building Type. No person may occupy
any dwelling unit located on the Property unless he or she is at
least fifty-five (55) years of age, or otherwise qualifies for
residency pursuant to California Civil Code Section 51.3.
2. T~. These covenants are to run with the land
and shall be binding on all parties and all persons claiming
under them for a period of thirty (30) years from the date these
covenants are recorded, after which time said covenants shall be
automatically extended 'for successive periods of ten (10) years
unless an instrument signed by a majority of the then owners of
the lots, and the City of Temecula, has been recorded, agreeing
to change said covenants in whole or in part.
3. Enforcement. Enforcement shall be by proceedings
at law or in equity against any person or persons violating or
attempting to violate any covenant either to restrain violation
R:~S~STA~INFI~LD.DA 2/23/93 k]b - 2 3 -
or to recover damages. The City of Temecula may enforce any
covenant of this Declaration.
4. Attorneys Peem. Should any party bring an action
against the other for the purpose of enforcing the terms of this
Stipulation, or for damages arising from-its breach, then in such
event, the prevailing party shall be entitled to its reasonable
attorneys fees and costs in addition to any other award entered
by the Court.
5. Severab~l'ity. Invalidation .of any'one of these
covenants by judgment or court ordershall in no wise-affect any
of the other provisions which shall remain in full force and
effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Declarant has executed this Declaration
of restrictions the day and year first above written.
DECLARANT:
Signature
Name:
Address:
R:~S~STAFF~.DA 2f23~3 IFab - 2 4 -
DBlr~LO~ PT.aN
=.= -.'- ~.-r.-"'=:'r- ==.=.-
uSES,.
', /
ATTACHMENT NO. 6
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
AUGUST 17, 1992
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
MONDAY, AUGUST 17, 1992
· A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Planning Commission was called to order Monday,
August 17, 1992, 6:00 P.M., Vail Elementary School, 29915 Mira Loma'Drive, Temecula,
California, Chairman John E. Hoagland presiding.
PRESENT: '5
ABSENT: 0
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
Blair, Chiniaeff, Fahey, Ford, H0agland
None
Also present were AsSistant City Attorney John Cavanaugh, Planning Director Gary Thornhill,
Senior Planner Debbie Ubnoske and Minute Clerk Gall Zigler.
PUBLIC COMMENT
None
COMMISSION BUSINESS
1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Chairman Hoagland requested Item No. 6 be taken as the first item of business after
approval of the agenda.
It was moved by Commissioner Blair, seconded by Commissioner Fahey to approve the
agenda with Item No. 6 as the next order of business. The motion was unanimously
carried.
NON-PUBLIC HEARING iTEM
Plannine Commission Chairman and Vice Chairman Election
Commissioner Ford nominated Dennis Chiniaeff as Chairman.
Commissioner Blair nominated Linda Fahey as Chairman.
Commissioner Chiniaeff withdrew his name from .nomination and Commissioner
Fahey's nomination as Chairman was unanimously approved as follows:
PCMIN8/1 7192
~ -1-
119192
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
ABSTAIN: 2 COMMISSIONERS:
PUBLIC HEARING
Chiniaeff, Ford
AUGUST 17, 1992
3. Variance No. 12
.Proposal to erect two freestanding signs-one six foot high sign adjacent tO Jefferson
Avenue and. one. twenty-five foot high sign adjacent to Interstate 15 with copy for the
Hungry' Hunter and Jan Wailerr R.V.. on each sign. ·.
Matthew Fagan presented the staff report.
Chairman Fahey opened the public hearing at 6:10 P.M.
Larry Bradley, Sign Tech Electrical Advertising, representing the applicant, concurred
with the staff report.
It was moved by Commissioner Chiniaeff, seconded by Commissioner Blair to close the
public hearing at 6:10 P.M. and adopt Resolution No. 92-(next) approving Variance No.
12 based on the analysis and findings contained in the staff report and subject to the
Conditions of Approval.
The motion was unanimously approved as follows:
AYES:
5 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Chiniaeff, Ford, Hoagland, Fahey
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
Tentative Tract Man No. 25277 and Change of Zone No. 5724
Proposal is a request to subdivide a 47.7 acre parcel into 96 single family lots and 5
open space lots and a zone change'from R-R to R-1.
Saied Naaseh advised that the item has been rescheduled to the meeting of September
21, 1992.
It was moved by Commissioner Chiniaeff, seconded by Commissioner Hoagland to
continue Tentative Tract Map No. 25277 and Change of Zone No. 5724 to the
meeting of September 21, 1992.
The motion was unanimously approved.
5. Development AQreement No. 92-1 {DA 92-1|, Change of Zone No. 21 and Tentative
PCMINB/17/92 -3.- ·
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES AUGUST 17, 1999
Parcel Mao No. 27314, Amendment No. 2
Proposal is a request to subdivide a 96.9 acre parcel into 4 parcels and a 48.4 acre
remainder parcel, A Development Agreement to ensure the development of the project
as senior housing, congregate care facility, skilled nursing, personal care, a nine hole
private golf course and dedication of a 2.3 net acre parcel to the City of Temecula, and
a Zone Change from R-R (Rural Residential) to R-3 (General Residential).
Commissioner Blair stepped down due to a conflict of interest.
Saied Naaseh presente. d the staff report.
Roger D. Prend of Albert A. Webb Associates, 3788 McCray Street, Riverside,
architect representing the applicant, stated that they are in concurrence with the staff
report, however, commented on the severity of the five (5) year time limit and
suggested some additional language allowing the Planning Commission or the City
Council to use their judgemerit based on the amount of financial contribution or
improvement to the property instead of a five year limit, in the event of financial
difficulties. Mr. Prend added that the idea behind the development is to have a zone
change and a conceptual site plan/parcel map to allow a developer to come in and
finance a project and the development agreement is the guarantee for the right to do
the development as it is being proposed.
Commissioner Ford questioned whether the golf course is proposed to be public or
private.
Roger D. Prend stated that although it is proposed as private, the applicant would like
not to restrict it at this time and give the developer that option.
Chairman Fahey opened the public hearing at 6:30 P.M.
John Telesio, 31760 Via Telesio, Temecula;stated that he is in support of the project,
however requested clarification of the following: what'.is the meaning of senior
housing,' and that the School portion will remain zoned R-R. Mr. Telesio also expressed
concern that the senior housing portion of tills development is proposed adjacent to
the high school which might present a problem due to noise and lighting from football
and other school oriented events.
Bob Pipher, 41825 Green Tree Road, Temecula, expressed his concern that the area
remain zoned R-R.
Bob Kosslyn, representing Temecula Valley Unified School District, also expressed a
reservation with the proposed senior project adjacent to the high school which may
generate noise and light pollution during school events. Mr. Kosslyn requested that a
disclaimer be Dresented in any purchase or rental agreement.
PCMIN 8/17/92
919/92
ING=, :~' COMMISSION MINUTES
Commissioner Ford expressed the following cc~ncerns:
AUGUST 17, 1999
Is there adequate parking for a public golf course?
A reciprocal access agreement is in .place until the future plans for the school
are completed.
What is the definition of a completed golf course as referenced in the
development agreement? '
Commissioner Ford e>~pressed these concerns regarding the development agreement':
* Page 18, 16.1 The number of units proposed in the development agreement
is not concurrent with that stated in the market report, clarify the request.
* Page 22, 18(E) Correct to read Pauba and Rancho Vista Road.
Page 23, 19(C) States that the grading must all be at one time and asked if the
developer been conditioned for immediate adherence to an erosion control
condition.
Page 24', 21 (A) Suggest that instead of 'developer" should read "owner" or
"successor".
Page 26, (31) Request staff to clarify the reference to specimen trees.
Page 26, (36) should read "entrance gates".
Page 26, (42) should include a requirement for clearances from the Army Corp
of Engineers, Fish and Game, and Fish and Wildlife.
Page 29, review and clarification of access points.
Commissioner Chiniaeff stated that conceptually the project appears to be good for the
community, however, he felt that the Commission was' being asked to make
environmental findings that the Commission is not able to make regarding the following
matters:
grading impacts and erosion control
number of units planned
* public vs. private golf course traffic impacts
impacts of dividing parcel 2 whose property line is on the lake
* traffic impacts
° impact of the stadium adjacent to the project and the proposed mitigation
a general plan presumption that this area will be zoned high density
Commissioner Chiniaeff also expressed these concerns regarding the development
agreement:
PCMINell 7192
Ir.,.~..~,-p: ........PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
requested clarification of Page 3, M-2 and M-3.
AUGUST 17. 1992
reference to the potential for amendment and interpretations; suggest outlining
what cannot be amended.
makes reference tO maximum building heights and sizes of proposed buildings,
however, the Commission has not been.provided that information.
Commissioner Chiniaeff concluded that he feels that the request was premature based ·
on the information provided to the Commission to make a .recommendation.
Commissioner Hoagland stated that he concurred that the project appeared good
conceptually, however, this is a major development and requires a major development
review. Commissioner Hoagland expressed concern regarding the following:
what the impacts to the project and the surrounding residents would be if the
school relocates the gym and other facilities as stated.'
* buffering of the school and the project with respect to noise, lighting, etc.
It was moved by Commissioner Hoagland, seconded by Commissioner Chiniaeff to
continue off-calendar, Development Agreement No. 92-1 (DA 92-1 ), Change of Zone
No. 21 and Tentative Parcel Map No. 27314, Amendment No. 2 to allow the developer
to work with staff on some of the specific items discussed.
Commissioner Ford added that the specifications of the senior center should be
included in the development agreement.
The motion was unanimously approved as follows:
AYES: 5
NOES: '0
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
Blair, Chiniaeff, Ford, Hoagland, Fahey
None
PLANNING DIRECTOR REPORT
Gary Thornhill reported the following:
Final technical sub-committee meeting scheduled for Tuesday, August 18th, on
Growth Management. Also planning' a Town Hall meeting for August 27th and
a joint City Council/Planning Commission meeting for September 3rd.
Anticipate going to public hearing with the General Plan the third week of
October.
PCMINBI1 7192
Temporary Sign Ordinance' will come back to the Commission in three weeks.
Staff has been authorized to enforce removal of signs in public right-of-way and
8/1182
ATTACHMENT NO. 7
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
AUGUST 17, 1992
Case No.:
RECO~ATION:
STAFF I~gPORT- PLANNING
CrrYOFTI 4 LA
PLANNING CO1VIMI~SION
August 17, 1992
Development Agrsnent No. 92-1, Change of
Zone No. 21, Tt~tafive Parcel Map No. 27314,.
AmendmentN0. 2 -
l>repax~ By: 3aied Naaseh
]tF. CO~ Adoption of Negative Declaration for.
Development Agreement No. 92-1, Change of Zone No. 21 and
Tentative Parcel Map No. 27314, Amendment No. 2; and
ArlOPT Resolution No. 92-. recommending Approval for
Development Agreement No. ~2-1, Change of Zone No. '21 and
Tentative Paroel Map No. 27314, Amendment No. 2 based on the
Analysis and-Findings contained in the Staff Report and subject to
th~ ~lmch~l Conditions of Approval.
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPUCANT:
Linf-zld Chri,~in. School
Alben A. Webb Associates
PROPOSAL:
A request for approval of Development Agreement No.' 92-1 (refer to Attachment No. 6) to
ensure the development of the site as a multi-family senior complex, congregate care, personal
care and skilled nursing facilities, a nine-hole goff course and the dedication of a senior center
to the City of Temecuh (refer to Exhibit "D"); a request for approval of Change of Zone No~
21 to change the zoning from Rural Residential ('R-R). to General Residential (R-3) for parcels
1 through 4 of the Parcel Map (refer to Exhibit "F") and a request for approval of Tentative
Parcel Map No. 27314, Amendment No. 2 to create four (4) parcels and a Remainder Parcel
(refer to Exhibit "E").
LOCATION:
Fast of Temecuh Valley High School, south of Rancho Vista Road
and north of Pauh Road
s~rA~,nrrss4Tm.~c vsw 1
ZONING: RoR (Rural l~eside~-l)
SURROUNDING
ZONING:-
PROPOSED ZONING:
EXISTING LAND USE:
North:
South:,
East:
West:
Specific Plan (SP 219, Palore; Del SoD
Rural Peside,,~l (R-R)
bat
R-3 (General Residenti,d)
Linfield School Site
SURROUNDING
IAND USES:
PROJECT STATISTICS
North:
South:
Bast:
West:
Single Pamily Dwellings
Vacant (lMloma del Sol)
Single Family Dwc!llngs
Temecula Valley High School
Life of the Development AgTeement
Number of Parcels
Total acres
Parcel 1/Senior Center Site
Parcel 2flVlulti-fam~y Complex
Parcel 3/Congregate Facility
Parcel 4/Skilled Nursing, Personal Care
Remainder Parcel/I,in~eld School
BACKGROUND
15 years
4 plus a Remainder Far.~l
96.9 acres
2.3 acres
38.0 acres
6.2 acres
2.0 acres
48.4 acres
This project was submitted to the City of Temecula on 'December 17,' I991. Three (3)
Development Review Committee meetings were seimeduled on. January 16, 1992, February 27,
1992 and May 7, 1992. On June 15, 1992 the application was' deemed complete and was
scheduled for: Planning Commission HearinS.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This project consists of a Development Agreement, a Zone Change and a'Parcel Map.
following represents a' summary of the individual applications:
Development Arreement 92-1
The purpose of this Development Agreement (D.A.) is to ensure the future development of
parcels 1 through 4 of Parcel Map No. 27314 Amendment No. 2 as a multi-family senior
complex, congregate care, personal care and ~ nursing facilities, a nine (9) hole privat~
golf course and the coustruction and dedic,,don of a seatior center on Parcel 1. A deed
swr^mu, n273a~ra~c ,s- 2
restriction will limit the age of all r~ide~ts within this project to 55 or older. This D.A. is tied
to the Change of Zone application to ensure the development of the above mentioned uses.
Specific .language in the D.A. reve, x~ back the Zoning and the Genex~ Plan Land Use
designations from R-3 and High Density to R-1 and Low Medium Density or Public Institutional
if the developer does not begin substantial consmz~ of the multi-family senior complex and
The. development of the site wffi comply. with all the nxluh~ of Ordinance No. 348,
however, if new standards are adopted by the Cjty.by the '.~ the applicant applies for further
entitlement.s, new standards will apply to the project.
Change of Zone No. 21
The current zoning on the property is Rural Pe$ide~ti.! (rder to A~c"mcnt No. 7) and ie
applicant is requesting a change of zone to General P~ideml.! (refer to Al~chment No. 8) for
parcels I through 4 of the Parcel Map. The remslm~r pal%~] felltinS the R-R zoning
designation.
Tentative Parcel Map No. 77314. Amendmps~t No. ?
This parcel map will allow the parcelization of a 97.9 acre parcel which includes the Ijnfield
School site which will be designated as a Remainder Parcel. Parcel No. 1 will be constructed
as a senior center and will be dedicated to the City for operation and maintenance. Parcel No.
2 will be developed as a multi-family senior complex with an integrated nine (9) hole golf
coune. Parcel No. 3 will be set aside for the Congregate Care facility and Parcel No. 4 will
be developed as Personal Care and Skilled Nursing facilities. Access to Parcel 1 is provided by
two 30 foot wide driveways, access to Parcel 2 is provided by two 30 foot wide driveways, one
on Pauba Road and one on Rancho Vista Road, Parcel 3 will have one exclusive 30 foot access
drive aisle and a shared drive aisle with Parcel 4 with the same width. The Remainder Parcel
will be served by the existing driveway.. Several structures including the school's gymnasium,
three storage structures and a residence and a baseball field exist on the site and will be removed
to allow the construction of the project, These facilities lmve been incorporated into the
proposed master plan for the Linfield School. ' '
Two narrow, 20 foot wide drainage ditches enter the northwestern comer of the site, converge,
and then terminate in the unvegetated alluvial wash which is identified as a Blue Line Stream
on the USGS maps. The drainage ditches contain a low quality Sonthem Willow Scrub which
qualifies as wetland habitat as identified in the BiOlogical Report.
ANALYSIS
Development Agreement 92-1
Since the development of this project as a senior housing complex required a zone change from
R-R to R-3, Staff was concerned.about the potential development of the site as a high density
apamnent complex permitted under the R-3 zone. One way to insure the development of the
ms'rAnmyru'ui4TTM.iw: v~w 3
The D.A. requires the developer Iv comply with a Development Sci~nle, (refer ID Exhibit "C'
of A.ncbment No. 6). The following ,~pn.s~ats the developer's responsibilities under this
agreement.
Within five (5) years of the e~ecti~ date of tiffs Development Agn~ent, Owner shall
have subst=nfi=Hy begun ~uuction Of each of the following uses: '
a. Twenty (20) dwelling units of the Senior Citizen Housing Development, and
The Congregate Care Facility, Skilled Nursing Facility, or Personal Care Facility.
"Substantially be~,uu con~' shall mean oblaining a building permit and having an
approved and inspecttvl foundafiou.
After twenty-five (25) percent of the dwelling units within the-multi-family senior
housing complex have received Occupancy Permits and prior to the next Occupancy
Permit issuance within this complex, owner shall have constructed and. obtained a
Certificate of Occupancy for the Senior Citizen Center, and shall have completed the golf
course.
Within five (5) years of the effective date of this Development Agreement, Owner shah
have recorded Paxeel Map No. 27314 and' have obtained all subsequent development
appwvals for the Senior Citizen Housing' Development, the CongroOm Care Facility,
the Skilled Nursing Facility, and'the Personal Care Facility.
4. Within the term of this Development Agreement Owner shall have obtained Cezii~cates
of Occupancy for all buildings identified in .the ~bsequent development appwvals.
Failure to meet. any of these deadlines wffi .result in a breach of the D.A., and the city wffi
initiate the reversion of the zoning designation and the Genentl Plan Land Use designation from
R-3 and High Density Residentinl to R-1 and Low Medium Density Residential or Public
Institutional.
In order to satisfy the Quimby Act requirements which are usually collected prior to the
recordation of the Final Map, the applicant wffi receive a fitty (50) percent credit towards the
construction of the private golf course. The conceptual site plan for the project (refer to Exhibit
"D") shows no public parking spaces for this facility, therefore, it wffi be used exchsively by
the residents of the complex. The remslning fifty (50) percent of the Quimby requirements is
satisfied by the construction and dedication of the Senior Center site which will actually exceed
the Quimby Act requirements. Both of these facilities wffi be built after twenty-five (25) percent
developer could have 20 aimproved foundations for the mulfi-fam~y senior complex and have
revived th~ approval for th~ fomutafion of either tbe ~ ~ ~ ~ nu~g
~~ ~ ~ci1~e~, ~ ~ve ~ ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ or ~e
~or
~n~r or ~ ~ff ~.
Change of 7one No. ?1
This Change of Zone from R-R to R-3 was neces~ry to allow the develeper to apply for the
entitlemenU n'ecessnry to build the senior housing complex as identified in the D.A. Moreover,
titis zone change is 'conditional" upon the pe~onnnnce of the developer in regards to the
development of the site as specified in the Development Schedule of the ~),A, (refer to Exhibit
"E" of Atrn~*hment 6).
ral lan designations will reven backfrom g.3andHigh~ Residential tog-1 and
Low Medium Density Residewlnl or Public ln._qitutional.
Tentative Parcel Mqp No. 77314. Amendment No. 2
The proposed map wffi subdivide the 98.9 acre pat~ into four (4) parcels and a Remainder
Parcel. The Senior Center site is located on Paw. ei No. 1. Due to the existing topography, the
whole site will probably have to be mass graded in order for this parcei to be developed.
Otherwise, the parcel by itself wffi be difficult to grade and .build on.
Since the D.A.. requires
the developer to construct and dedicate the site to the City prior to release of the first occupancy
penit for the multi-family complex Staff does not foresee a potentlnl problem with the
topography. '
Compatibility with the Surrounding Uses
The site will be hordered by existing single-family residential to the north and proposed single-
family to the south, and two schools to the east and west. Staff has not been contacted by either
of the two Home Owners Associations (HOAs), Villn Avanti to the north and Green Tree to the
east,' expressing opposition to the project. 'Both of these HOAs have been notified of the Public'
Hcaxing.
However, the Temecuh Valley Unified School Di~rict has expressed concern about the pwject
and has requested a Conditional of Approval be added to protea their interests (refer to
Condition No. 34 and Attachment No. 11 ). Staff shares the concerns of the School District
since the proposed senior citizen complex will be surrounded by two schools which could impact
this pwject. The existing stadium wffi generate light and noise that wffi need to be mitigated
at the plot plan stage (refer to Condition No.35). '
ZONING, FUTURE GENERAL PLAN AND SWAP CONSISTENCY
The pwposed project includes a change of zone from R-R to R-3. This change will allow the
development of the projea site as a senior housing complex as dictated. within the D.A. The
City of Temecuh is supportive of fixis change of zone since it will result in a desirable senior
housing project consistent with the surrounding land uses.
swra~p.~ruTs~rrrK~c v~w 5
The first daft of the pruferred land me map shows the project site as Public htstimtional since
TI~ SWAP d~gnation for the project site is residential minimum ol~ acre lot size The City
· ENVIR. O~~ DETERMINATION
· An Initial Study 'was prepared. for fixis project and'with the adoption of mitigation measures
which have been inClude~ in the Conditions of Approval all the anticipated impacts have been
reduced to a level of in~ieni~amCe. '
The~ore, a Negative Declaration has been prepared and
recommended for adoption. The fonowin~ s~mm~,,-i,~_ tlz ~on measures.
Structures proposed in the 63
Flood Plain wMch has ~
create. x:l as a result of
surface drainage entering
the site- -__ ....
Existence of wetlands on
the site
Temecula Valley High
School stadium noise and
lights
entering th~ property from
adjacent areas
A mitigation measure that is
acceptable to the Army
Corps of Engineers, Fish
and Game and Fish and
W~dlife
33
These impacts shah be dealt
with at the Plot Plan stage
and include mitigation
m~asures such as building"
orientation, bu~ding design
features such as o~er hangs,
landscaping and setbacks
35
~s'ram. mmurrac~c ,v, 6
Traffic impact of the *
project bn the public street
system with 1,610 daily
vehicle Uips including 130
pe~k hour trips and th~
operation of a major
inte.nection at level of
service C or beUer ·
Internal circulation impacts'
to cars and pedemians
~FumRoadand
project site
TbeSatefortbe
multi-family senior
back sufficiently to
allow for st~ciring of
36 & 37
Impaas w Fir~ S~rvices
Impacts to Library Services
A pedestrian friendly
circuhtion system
shall be designed to
.separv. ethe
pedestrian circuh~on
from the auto
circu]ation by !inking
padring lots,
bufidings and
recreation .areas
u tUerbyacce
paving, crosswalks,
lighting, hndscaping
and signage
A $400.00 per dwelling unit
fire mitigation fee shall be
assessed against the pwject
A $100.00 per dwelling unit
library mitigation fee shall
· be assessed against the
pwject
38
21
s~r~3u,r~73~4Trm. pc v~e 7
Aesthetics Impact to the
surrouuding uses
SUM1VIARY/CONCLUSIONS
39
The senior citizen complex shah be wnmmiaed as specified in the Developanent Agremnent.
At the same time the D.A. prevents the constmclion of high density apartments once the zoning
is changed to R-3. The develolzr has five (5) years to start the consUuaion of the project and
fifteen (15) years to complete the projea. The consreaction and dedication of the Senior Center
and the construction and operation of the golf course arc required after twenty-five (25) percent
of the dwelling units within the multi-family senior housing complex have received Occupancy
Permits and prior to the next Occupancy Permit issuance within this complex.
Staff feels that the approval of the Development Agreement, Zone Change and the Parcel Map
will start the foundation of a senior citizen complex that will receive more defiled xtwiew at the
Plot Plan stage to ensure the projects consiste-~t with the existing and proposed uses surrounding
the site.
FINDINGS
Development Agreement 'No. 92'1
The City is proceeding in a timely fashion With the preparation of its Geneva/Plan.
There is a reasonable probability that the D.A. will be consistent with the General Plan
proposal presently being considered, since the pwjea will be compatible with
surrounding
uses and will carry out the-policies intended for the C, enemi Phn.
Therefore, there is a reasonable probability that the D.A. will be consistent 'with the
future General Plan.
There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future
adopted General Plan ff the D.A. is ,,lfim,teJy inconsistent with the plan, since this
pwjea will be compatible with the surrounding uses.
sxs'r~z~ru~zrrrM.~ vsw 8
e
The D.A. complies with all other applicable requiremems Of stale Law and Local
OrdinanCeS.
deemed feasible to mili~Ue adverse impacts fizreof have been incorporated into the City
No other mitig~tlon measures for mvironme,~l iml~t~ c'mat~ by ti~ project, as
presently approved shall be required for development of the pwject unless mandated by
hws. ·
The City may, pursuant to and in accordance with i~s rules, re~htions, and ordinances,
conduct an environmental P3view of subsequeS disc~imsa~ entltlements for the
development of the yrolx~ty or any chan~es, nmesdments, or modifications w the
property. The City, as a resul~ of such zeview, may impose additional measures (or
conditions) to mitiEate, as pel, milled by hw, the advefie eDvirOnmental impaas of such
development entitlement which were not considered or mifiFed at the time of approval
of the D.A.
Chani, e .of Zone No. 21
Them is a reasonable probability tha~ CbanSe of Zone No. 21 will be consistent with the
City's future General Plan, which will be completed in a reasonable time and in
accordance with State Law, due to the fact that the future development of the site wffi
be controlled by a Development Agreement which is wnsist~ with City's policies for
the new General Plan.
,
Them is not a likely pwbability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future
General Plan, ff Change of Zone No. 21 is Ultimately inconsistent with the plan, due to
faa that the development of the site wffi be controlled by a Development ~ent
which is consistent with time City's policies for the finnre General Plan.
The pwjea is compatible with surrounding land .uses' since this projea will not' have
· negative impacts on the existing school sites to the east and west and the existing and
proposed single-family dwellings to the north and south.
e
The proposal wffi not have an adverse effect on the environment, since mitigation
measures have been incoqxn~ to the project desi~ and conditions of approval to
reduce the impacts to a level of inSignifiCance.
Tentative Parcel M~p No. 27314
There is a reasonable probability that Tentative Parcel Map No. 27314 will be consi-qent
with the City's future General Plan, which wffi be compleled in a reasonable time and
in accordance with State Law. The projea, as condi~oned, conforms with existhE
applicable city zoning ordinances and development standards.
swrans,nrn~crm.x,c n- 9
There is not a likely probability of substantial deelment t0, or interference with the
City's future General Plan, if the proposed use is ultimately inconsistent with the Plan,
since the future development of the site will be controlled by a Development Agreement
The proposed use or action as condifioned complies with State plnnninff and zoning laws
P, efermwe local OxdlrnnceS No. 348, 460;' aud Californi, Govexnmenml Code S~
6sooo-66oo9 hnninS and zo g hw).
The project as designed and ~ndi~oned wffi no~ adversely nffec~ time public health 'or.
weftare since aJl impaL-~ have been mlti~te4J to a knv~ Of insignifiCance~
The projea is compatible with surmundi~ land uses since the proposal will not have a
negative impact on the existing school sites to the east and west and the existing and
proposed single-family dwelllnEs to the north and south.
The pwject has. acceptable access to de~ic~te~ tights-of-way which are open w, and
useable by, vehicular traffic. The project draws access from Pauba Road and Rancho
Vista Road, improved dedicated City rights-of-way. Project access, as designed and
condi~oned, .conforms with applicable City l:ngineexing standards and Ordin=nceS.
The project as designed and conditioned will not adversely affect the built or uamral
environment as determined in the Environmental Analysis for this project.
Said Findings are supported by minutes, maps, exhibits and environmental docmnents
associated' with this application and herein incorporated by rderence, due to the fact that
'.they are referenced in the attached Staff Report, Exhibits, Environmental Assessment,
and Conditions of Approval.
STAFF
RECO~ATION:
]tVCO~ Adoption of Negative Declaration for
Development'Agreement No. 92-1, Change of Zone No.--21 and
TenUttive Parcel. Map No. 27314, Amendment No. 2; and
AfM3PT Resolution No. 92-. recommending Approval for
Development Agreement No. 92-1, Change of Zone No. 21 and
Tentative Parcel Map No. 27314, Amendment No. 2 based on the
Analysis and Findings contained in the Staff Report and subject to
the attached ConditiOns of ~val.
s~rA--arr~ntrrr~.z.c ~s, 10
2.
3.
4.
s
10.
11.
12.
13.
Resolutions - blue page 12
O~insnCe,~ - blue page 18
Conditions of Appwval - blue page 19
Exhibits - blue page 35
a.
b.
C.
d.
e.
f.
Concopmal Site Plan
Tentative hrcel lVI~ No. 27314,' ~kme-~dment No. 2.
Change of Zone No. 21
g. Conceptual Elevations
Initial Envizonmental Study - blue page 36
Development Agreement - bluo psgc 53
Sections 5.1 and 5.2 of Olx41nnnce No. 348, Rural l~sidemin! Zoning Standards -
blue page 54
Sections 8.1 and 8.2 of Ordinance No. 348, General Residential Zoning Standaids -
blue page 55
Sections 18.5 and 18.6 of OFllnnnc'~ No. 348, Stalidazd$ for Planned Residen~nl
Developments & Planned ]~e, sjdemini Developments-Senior Citizens - blue page 56
Sections 19.101, 19.102 and 19.103 of OrdinanCe No. 348, Congregate Care Facilities
Standards - blue page 57
School District Letter - blue page 58
Arthur Anderson Study, Development Program Recommendations - blue page 59
Miscellaneous .Con'espondenCe - blue page'60
s~Am~n.m,e.m.t,c ~ 11
ATTA~ NO. 1
RESOLUTIONS
s~r~mu,r~4rm.~ ,v, 12
ATFA~ NO. 1
RF~OLUTION NO. 92-
A RESOLUTION OF Tm?~ PLANNING COMMISSION OF
T~r- CITY OF TEMECULA RECO~ING APPROVAL
OF DEV~ OPMENT AGR~ NO, 92-1, CHANGE OF
ZONE NO. 21 TO CHANGE ~ ZONING FROM R-R TO
R~3, AND TENTATIVE PARCh- MAP NO~ 27314,
~I~FT NO. 2 TO SUBDIVIDE A 96.9 ACRE.
PARCRL INTO FOUR (4) PARCEL8 AND A R!~IAINDER
PARCRI. LOCATED NORTH OF PAUBA ROAD, ,SOUTH OF
RANCHO VISTA ROAD AND EAST OF Tn'R ~
V~LLRy HIGH SCHOOL,
VIrHER!?.4~, The Lin~ead School filed Development Agremnem No. 92-1, Chz,,~Ec of
Zone No. 21 and Parcel Map No. 27314, .Amendment No. 2 in accordance with the Riverside
County Land Use, Zoning, Phnning and Subdivision OITlimanCeS, which the City has adopted
by reference;
Wnrl~,EAS, said applications were processed in the time and manner prescribed by State
and local hw;
BSIk'~F.4,S, the Phnning Commission considered said applications on August 17, 1992,
at which time in~ persons had an opponu~ty to testify either in support or opposition;
Vv'~'~EAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, the Commi.~sion
recommended approval of said applications;
r ow, vnn oa , co nsmor oF' crr oF
TsnviE DOE aESOLVE, DETntMZf .,OrV OaDER as wuows:
Section 1. Findings. That the Temecuh Planning Commission hereby makes the
following findings:
A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly incorporated city shah
adopt a general plan within thirty (30) months foliowing incoxporation. During that 30-month
period of time, the city is not subjea to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or the
requirements of state hw that its decisions be consistent with the general plan, if all of the
following requirements are met:
general plan.
The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of the
s~ramu, x~4ma.~ n- 13
2. The planning a~ucy finds, in appmving projects and taking other actions,
including the issuance of building ]n'miU, each of the following:
a. There is a reasonable probability that the !and use or action
proposed will be consilent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which
will be maclied within a re-~au,ble time. ·
b. There is lilfle or no ptobab~ of subsantial detriment to or
interference with the future adopted general plan ff the proposed use or action is ultimately
inconsistent with the plan. · .. ' '
c. The proposed use or action complied with all other applicable
requirements of slate hw and local ort6n--noes.
B. The Riverside County General Plan, u mended. by the Southwest Area
Community Plan, Cnemim~er '~t'AP') was adopted prior to the inwrpom~on of Temecuh as
the General Plan for the southwest poniou of Riverside County, including the area now within
the boundaries of the City. At this time, the City Ins adopted SWAP as its General Plan
guidelines while the City is proceetlinE in a timely fashion with the preparation of its General
Plan.
C.. The Planning Commission in recommending approval of said applications makes
the following findings, to wit:
Development Agreement No. 92-1
General Plan.
The City is procee~inff in'a timely fashion with the preparation of its
2. 'There is a reasonable probability that the pwjea will be consistera with
the general plan proposal presen~y being considered, since the project wffi be compatible with
surrounding uses and will carry out the policies intended 'for the General Plan2
3. Them is little or no probabiliW of substantial detriment to or interference
with the future adopted general plan ff the projea is ultimately inconsistent with the plan, since
this project will not have a negative impact on the surrounding uses.
4. The project complies with all other applicable requirements of state hw
and local ordinances.
5. The environmental impacts of the agreement have been reviewed and all
measures deemed feasible to mitigate adverse impacts thereof have been incorporated into the
City approvals for the project.
6. No other mitigation mmsures for environmental impacts created by the
project, as presently appwved shall be required for development of the project unless mandated
by hws.
swr~uapT~nz4~-M. pc ~s~ 14
7. Th~ City may, ~ to ~ in tccoxdu~ with its rul~, regulations,
and ol~inances, conduct an mvironme-ffal ~ of sub~lue~ ~ enti~~ for
the dcvel.opmcnt of the pxopcdty or any changes, smmutme~, or modifications to th~ ptx~,tty.
The City;as a rexult of such review, may impo~ additional m~asures (or conditions) to mitigate
as p~rmitted by hw ti~ adv~ ~nvixonm~mal impa~ of such d~elopm~t ~titlem~nt which
were not considered or mltig~.d ~ the time ef ~ of the projea.
Change of .7one No. 21
1~ There is a masonable pmlmbilily that Change of Zone No. 21 will. be
consistent with the City's fum~ General Plan., which will be completed in a reasonable time and
in accordance with State Law, due to the fact that the futm-e development of the site will be
controlled by a Development Agreeanent which is con-~i~t~ with City's policies for the new
General Plan.
2. There is not a likely probability of substantial detriment to or interference
with the future General Plan, ff Change of Zone No. 21 is ultimately inconsistent with the plan,
due to fact that the development of tie site will be controlled by a Development Agreement
which is consistent with the City's policies for the funfie General Plan.
3. The projea is compatible with sunounding land uses since this project will
not have negative impacts on the existing school sites to the east and west and the existing and
proposed Single-family dwellings to the north and south.
4. The proposal will not have an adverse effect on the environment, since
mitigation measui'es have been inco~ into the projea design and conditions of approval
to reduce the impacts to a level of in.~ignificance.
Tentative Parcel M~p No. 27314. Amendment No. 2
1. There is a reasonable probability that Tentative Parcel Map No. 27314,
Amendment No. '2 .will be consistent. with the. City's future General Plan.,' which .will be
completed in a reasonable time and in accordance with State =law.. The project, as concli~oned,
conforms with existing applicable city zoning ordinances 'and development standards.
2. There is not a likely probability of substantial detriment W, or interference
with the City' s future General Plan, ff the proposed use is ultimately inconsistent with the Plan,
since the future develoZnnent of the site will be controlled by a Development Agreement which
is consistent with the City's policies for the new General Plan.
3. The proposed use or action as conditioned complies with State l~lanning
and zoning hws. Reference local Ordinances No. 348, 460; and California Governmental Code
Sections 65000-66009 (Planning and Zoning Law).
health or welfare.
The pwject as designed and conditioned will not adversely affect the public
swrA~wr-m.~ ,p 15
will not have a negative impact on the e0d~ng school sites to the east and west and the existing
and propo~ single-family dwellings to the north and south.
6. The project has accqmtble access to rk. dicste~J fights-of-way which are
open to, and useable by, ve~iq,lnr traffzc. The project draws access from Pauba Road and
Rancho Vista Road, improved ,~dicsted City tights-of-way. Project access, as designed and
condidoned, conforms with applicable City ~n~ineering standards and OrrlinnnCeS.
?- 'The project as desigp*d and conditioned Will not adversely affect the buil~
· or natural environment u dctcrmlnod in the Envjronmemtal Analysis for this project.
8. Said findings az~ mq,,lx,-tu:! by n,i,:olc. s, maps, exhibits and environmental
documents associated with this application and herein incoxpontecl by reference, due to the fact
that they arc referenced in the =ttnP. hed Staff Pepon, Exhibits, Environmental Assessment, and
Conditions of App--~.
F. As conditioned pursuant t~ SBC'I2ON rrt, the Parcel Mnp proposed is compatible
with the health, safety and welfare of the community.
Section 2. l=nvironrnentnl Cotr~llnncc. AJI lnltinl Study prcpazcd for this project
indicates that the proposed project will not have a signifiimnt impact on the environment with
the incorporation of the mitigation measures into the project design, and a Negative Declaration,
is hereby granted.
Section 3. Conditions. That the City of Temecuh Phnning Commission hereby
recommends appwval of Development Agreement 92-1, Change of Zone No. 21, and Tentative
Parcel Map No. 27314, Amendment No. 2 located at north of Pauh Road, south of Rancho
Vista Road and east of the Tomecub Valley High School subjea to the following conditions:
A. Attachment No. 3, attached hereto.
Section 4. PASSED, AFPROVED AND ADOPTED this 17th day of August, 1992.
JOHN E. HOAGLAND
swrapppyn~4vnt~c ,p 16
I n S~:R s<Ry CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Temec-in at a ~ meeting then:of, held on the 17th day of
August, 1992 by the following vote of the COmmi,tb'iO!l:
AYES:
NOK~:
ABSENT:
'I~-ANNING COMMISSIiON'BRS:
PLA,NN~G COMMISSlONIKRS:
PLANNZNG COMMISSIO~f'
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
ORDINANCES
s~r~!4Tl3d, pC vSw
18
D~t,~TED BY STAFF
ATTA~ NO. 3
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
s~r~m~r~,rr~c~c .,. 19
CITYOFTI~I~"ULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Tentative Pan:el Map No: 27314, Amendment No. 2
Proje~ Desaip~on: A reque~ ~ subdivide a 96.9 acre
~ ~ 4 ~ alid a l~rnminder
Assessor's'Parcel No.: 946-070-080
The tentative subdivi~__on abaft comply with the Sta~ of Califor~s Subdivision Map Act
and to all the requirements of Orah,,nce 460, unless modified by the conditions listed
below. A time exXen.~ion my be spproved in accordance with the Sln~e Map Act and
City Ordln~nCe, upon wrinen n~!uest, ff made 30 days prior to the expiration date.
This conditionally approved tentslive map will expire two yesrs after the approval date,
unless enended as provided by Ordi~nce 460. The expiration daXc is
Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid prior to recordafion of the final map.
Legal access as required by ~ce 460 shall be provided from the tract map
boundary to a City maintained road.
Subdivision phasing, if applicable, shall be subject to Planning Departmere approval.
Any proposed phasing shall provide for adequate vehicular access to all lots in each
phase, and shall substantially conform t0 the intent and purpose of the subdivision
, approval.
A Homeowners Associntion shall be established for maintenance of Open Space/Common
Area and the developer/applicant shall pay for all costs relating to establishment of the
Homeowners Association.
A copy of the final grading plan shall be submined to the Planning Department for
review and approval. An on-site cut and fill slopes shall:
Be limited to a maximum slope ratio of 2 to 1 and a maximum vertical height of
~ (30) feet. Setbacks from top and bottom of dopes shall be a minimum of
one-half the slope height.
B. Be contour-graded to blend with existing natural contoun.
SWrAFi~sT~I4TrM.pC ~w
2O
e
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16..
17.
All slopes over three (3) feet in beight shall be S.n,tscaped and irrigated according to me
Ciiy Development Code. A de~.ed b-,dscaping and irrigation plan prepa~ by a
qualified professional, shall be submilKd to the City Planning Departm~t;t for zzwiew and
approval prior tO iSSl-unCe Of buikfing permits.
The-applicant shall comply with the environm~! health recommendations outlined in
the County. Health Dqat~ent's trsn.~nittnl dated July .1, 1992i a .copy of which is
The applicant shah comply with the fire improvement recomme-ndmlons outlined in the
County Fire Departmenrs letter dated May 4, 1992, a copy of which is attached.
All proposed construction shah comply with the Cafifornia Tn~tute of Technology,
Palomar Observatory Otndoor ~-ig~ng PoncT, as ~ in the' Southwest Area p~an.
The developer shall be responsible for msimensnCe a!ld lipkeep of all slopes,. landscaped
areas and irrigation systems until such time as those operations are the responsibilities
of other parties as approved by the Planning Director.
The appficant shah comply with the recommellda~olls 0lltlitled in the Rancho Water
transmittal dated May 7, 1992, a copy of which is attached.
The appficant shall comply with' the recommendations outlined in the RTA transmittal
dated March 2, 1992, a'copy of which is attached.
The appficant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Temecula
Community Services DistriCt trsnSmiltsul 'dated August 12, '1992, a c0pyof which is
attached. ·
Prior to recordation of the final map, an Enviromneetal Constraints Sheet (BC5) shah
be prepared in conjunction with the final map to delineate identified environmental
concerns and shall be permanently filed with the office of the City Engineer. A copy of
the ECS shall be transmitted to the Planning Depa,~ent for review and approval. The
approved ECS shah be forwarded with wples of the recorded final map to the Planning
Department and the Depamnm of Building and Safety.
The following notes shall be placed on the Environmental Constraints Sheet:
A. This property is located within thirty (30) miles of Mount Palomar Observatory.
swr~n,ptp~a4-n~.pc ,p 21
A fifty (50) foot wide e~,~-mem sludl be recorded on both sides of the wetland
habitm as iden~ in the Biological Report and shall be designated a biological
open space. The area within this easement may be incmpozated into the design
of the golf course.
Drainage easements shall be iu:pt free of buildings and obstructions.
The lO0-year floodplain area shall be de~ne~red.
Prior to the i~,,-,,ce of building pezmits de~ileO common open space area
hnd~ng and iuiga~on plau~ gall be submined for Phnning Depamnent
approva/for the phase of development in process. The plans shall be certified
by a l~ndsc'~pe architect, and .shall provide for the following:
Permanent automatic irrigation systems shall be installed on all landscaped
·IAndscape screening where required shall be designed to be opaque up to
a minimum height. of six (6) feet at maturity.
All utility service areas and enclosures shall be screened from view with
landscaping and decorative harriers or baffle treatments, as appmved by
the Planning Director. Utilities shall be phced underground.
Parkways shall be hnd,~ped to provide visua/screening or a transition
into the primary use area of the site. Landscape elements shall include
earth benning, ground cover, shrubs and specimen trees. 'Front yards
shall be landscaped and street trees planted.
Wall plans shall be submitted for ·the project perimeter' and-along
~,tar~a,--:.4~ Road. Wooden fencing shall. not .be allowed on the perimeter
of the project. All lots with slopes leading down from the lot shall be
pwvided with gates in the wall for maintenance access.
hndscaping plans shall incoxpm-ate the use of specimen accent trees at
key visual focal points within the projea.
Where street trees cannot be planted within right-of-way of interior streets
and pwject parkways due to insufficient road right-of-way, they shall be
planted outside of the road right-of-way.
I ~ndsc~ping plans shall incorporate native and drought tolerant plants
where appropriate.
s~rax,nt, ruTsz4-rr~.~c v~w 22
i.
jo
ALl e0cisting speclme., trees and significast rock outcroppings on the
subject iao~.,ty shall be shown on the projea's Zr,,dlnE plans and shall
note thOSe tO be rmnoved, re~oc~ted and/or wr~ine~.
All trees shall be minimum double staked. Weaker and/or slow growing
trees simil be sted staked.
19.
conceptual grading plan shall be submitted to the Planning Director for approval.
The plan shah be used as a g-ideliw~. for subsequent defiled grading plans for
indi'.vidual phases of development and shall inchute the following:
(1)
. Techni~t~les which wffi be utilized to px,~went erosion and sedimentation
.during and after the grading process.
(2)
Approximate tim~ frames for grading and identification of areas which
may be graded during the higher probability rain months of January
through Mat~.
(3) Preliminary pad and roadway elevations.
Be
(4) Areas of unpon~ gridinS outsid~ of a particu~ phase.
All cut slopes located adjacent to ungrnd__ecl natural terrain and exceeding ten (10)
feet in vertical height sixall be contour-graded incorporating the following grading
techniqueS:
(1)
(2)
The angle of the graded slope shall be gradually adjusted to the angle of
the natural terrain.
Angular forms shall. be discouraged.. The. graded form shall reflect the
natural rounded terrain.
(3)
The toes and tops of slopes shall be rounded with curves with radii
designed in pn>yo, tion to the total height of the slopes where drainage and
stability permit such rounding.
(4)
Where cut or fill slopes exceed 300 feet in horizontal length, the
horizontal contoun of the slope shall be curved in a continuous,
undulating fashion.
Prior to the issuance of grdding permits the developer shall provide evidence to
the Director of Building and Safety that '~ adjacent off-site manufactuFed slopes
have recorded slope easements and that slope maintenance r'~ponsibitities have
been ~igne~ as approved by the Direaor of Building and Safety.
sxs'r~r~,ru~zrrrM.ec ,p 23
20.
21.
na · y paying the appwih~e fee set forth in that
ordinance. Should Ordinance No. 663 be superseded by the provisions of a
Habitat Consen,afion Plan prior to the payment of the fee required by Ordinance
No. 663, the applicant shall pay the fee required by the Habitat Conservation Plan
as implemented by County ordinance or resolution.
S.' Prior to i.~,,,,~ of gradin__g permits, erosion control landscaping shall be
provided c~n~st~t with Or,~inanc~ No. 457.78.
F..' An overall conceptual landscape plan shall be-submitted to. the Planning
Department for approval prior to is,sate of any grading permits. This plan shall
v~.~.'g~u~vkl~areas which wffi be isnd~ including front yards, slopes
parkways, etc. C~ i,,~lscape plans for each phase shall be submitted
for approval tO the Phl!l~ ~ prior to i,Issmnce of any building permits
for that phase.. All common area lsnt~R"4pin~ for each phase shall be installed
prior to isSlumce Of the ~ for any building in that phase.
Prior W the iSSV.nCe Of ~ permitS, a qualified paleol~]ogist shal] be retailled by
the developer for consulUnion and comment on the proposed grading with respect to
potential paleontological impam. Should the paleomologist find the potential is high for
.impact to significant resources, a pre-grade meeting between the paleontologist and the
excavation and grading contractor shal/be arranged. When necessary the paleontologis~
or representative slutll have the authority W ten~porarily divert, ~ or halt grading
activity to allow recovery of fossils.
Prior to the issuance ofBun.nlNG P~Mrl's the following conditions shall be satisfied:
No building permits shall be issued by the City for any residential lot/unit within
the project boundary until the dsvelopsr's successor's-in-inmmst provides
evidence of compliance with public facility financing measures. A cash .sum of'
one-hundred dollars' ($100).per lot/unit' shall be deposited with the'City as
mitigation for public library d~velopment.
All building plans for all new structures shall inco~, all required elements
from the subdivision's appmved fh~ protection plan as approved by the County
Fire Manhal.
All dwellings to be wnsmuxed within this subdivision shall be designed and
constructed with fire maxdant (Class A) roofs as approved by the Fire Manhal.
Roof-mounted mechanical equipment shall not 'be permitted within the
subdivision, however solar equipment or any other energy saving devices shall
be permitted with. Planning Depamnent approval.
24
22.
23.
24.
BuildinS separation between all iadldlngs i~im4in~ Fareplaces shall not be less
than ten (10) feel
All !=ndsc~in$ and izriFnlon sladl be in-ealleri in accordance -wbh approvcd plans
prior To the iesponce of occ,vl~ncy perrobs. If seasonal conditions do not permit
phnfing, interim ls~~ and erosion comzol measures shall be utiliT~l as
appzoved by lt~ Plannin~ ~ and tJsi Dizector 'of ~,.~in~ and Safe...
and
All io,vlsc.~inE irri~q~, shall be ins-ned in acwadance with appwved plans
ent withjjM-Jje~pk T,,~ for tie refuse e w include the
u 'i,-'on of a smallpick-up track equipped with a lift mechanism in order to
move the containers out and back into the project; flus, prohibiting the entering
of large refuse trucks into the project. Said agreement shall be submitted to the
Plsnning Director for ~.
The subdivider shall defend, indemnify, and hoM harmless the City of Temectda, its
agents, officer, and employees from any claim, action, or proct.~-fing a~ainst the City of
approval of the City of Temecula, its advisor~ agencies, ~ boards or blishfive body
concerning Tentative Parcel Map No~ 27314,' Amendment No. 2, which action is brought
within the time period provided for in California Government Code Section 66499.37.
The City of Temecula wffi promptly notify ~e subdivider of any such chim, action, or
proceeding arainst the City of Temecuh and wffi cooperate fully in the defense. ff ~e
City fails to promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding or
fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the subdivider shall not, thereafter, be responsible
to defend, hdemnifjr, or hold im~nless 'the City of Tem.ecula.
The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site propeffy
interests, and ff he or she should fail to do so the developer shall at least 120 days prior
to submittal of the final map for approval, 'enter into an agreement to complete the
impwvements pursuant to Government Code Section 66462 at such time as the City
acquires the property interests required for the improvements. Such agreement shall
provide for payment by ~e developer of all 'costs incurred by ~e City to acquire the off-
site property in~ rsquimd in connection with the subdivision. Security of a portion
of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal
report obt~ed by the developer, at ~e devdoper's cost. The appraiser shall have been
appmved by the City prior to commencement of the 'appraisal.
Sk.~TAFI:IPT'~ZZi4T'f'M.I,C vlw ~
All utility systems including gas, electric, telephone, water, Sewer, and cable TV shall
be provided for under/roumt, with essements provided as required, and designed and
consu~ct~ in accordance with City Codes and ,ti~ utility provider Telephone, cable
T~, and/or security sysu~ms shall be pre-w~ in the resjdwces. '
26. AH utilities, except elec~c~! lines rated 33kv or greamr, shall be installed underground.
Covenants, Conditions. and l~estri~ons/R~n~al Access ~sements:
27.
29.
28.
The Covenants, Conditions and l~csiricti0m (CC&R's) shall be reviewed' and approved
by the Planning Department prior to final approval of the tract maps:' The CC&R's shah
include liability insurance and methods of m,iminlng the ope~ space, recrea~oll areas,
parking areas, private roads, and exterior of all buildings.
No lot or dwelling unit in the development shall be mid unless a corporation, assoch~on,
property owner's group, or similar entity has been formed with the fight to assess aH
properties individually owned or joinfly owned which have any fights or interest in the
use of the common areas and common f~cilitie~ in the development, such assessment
power to be suffwient to meet the expenses of such entity, and with authority to control,
and the duty to mnint~in, sll of ~ mutually available feanr~ of the development.
Such entity shall operate under reconied CC&R's which shall include compulsory
membership of all owners of lots and/or dwelling units and flexibility of
assessments to meet changing costs of mnintermnce, repairs, and services. Recorded
CC&R's shall permit enforcement by the City of Provisions required by the City as
Conditions of Approval. The developer shall submit evidence of compliance with this
requirement to, and receive approval of, the City prior to making any such sale. This
condition shall not apply to land dedicated to the City for public purposes.
Maintenance for all inndsc. aped and open areas, including parkways, shall be pwvided
for in the CC&R's.
30. Every owner of a dwelling unit Or lot shall'own as an appurtenance to'such dwelling unit
or lot., either (1) an undivided. interest in the' common-axeas and faciliU'es, or ('2) a 'share
'in the corporation, or voting membership in an association, owning the common areas
and facilities.
All existing specimen trees on the subject pwl/,dty shall be preserved wherever feasible.
as appwved by the Planning Director.
32.
Within forty-eight (48) hours of the approval of the project, the applicant/developer shall
deliver to the Planning Department a cashiers check or money order payable to the
County Clerk in the amount of One Thousand, Two Hundred, Seventy-Five DOlin~
($1,275.00), which includes the One Thousand, Two Hundred, Fifty Dollars ($1,250.00)
fee, in compliance with AB 3158 required by Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(d)C2)
plus the Twenty-Five Dollar ($25 ~00) County ndmini,mative fee to enable the City to file
the Notice .of Determination required under Public Resomces Code Section 21152 and
SISTAI~rRFI'~'B!4TTM. PC
26
condition, Fish and Gaxne Cod~ ~ection 711.4(c).
33.
35.
of F3sh and Crame prior to de~igplnE ~e site plan for the project to mitigate the impacts
tO the wetlaRds ~ ide..dlC. ed in thc FIgRIB 2 of the Biological Report which includes the
unvegetated alluvial wash and the Southern W'fflow Scrub. A proof of this consultation
shall ~ submitted to the lq,nnlnE Dq}amnmt along. with the Plot Plan or Conditional.
Use Permit applications. These applications .shall not be deemed complete without the
proof of co~mwlfnrlon with both of thcse agencies.
A full disclosure sial] be made to aH prospective residents, whether buyers or renters,
that the e~,einl~ Temec, ln Valley High School football s~alpm, tenni.~ COUlB and other
community activilies. These events occur duzing both the daytime and evening hours and
will genera _t~ considerable noise and light. The Temecttla Valley Unified School District
will not accept reslxm-_,n_'b~ for the impnet that these activiti~ may have on the
neighboring comple~_es '~r will any of these conditions be subject to mltig~tlon by the
district. The disclo~u~ shah be made at the time of initi~' nutrketing and through
individual grant deeds. The specific form of the disclosure shall be approved by the
Phnning Dizector and the City Attorney prior to i~mmnCe of b-iiding permits.
The proposed project will be impacted by the Temecuh Valley High School stadium
noise and fight. The following shall be implemented prior to approval of any Plot Plans
or Conditional Use Permits:
A noise study shall be submitted. Thk study shall examine the impact of the
stadium on the proposed residences. Mitigation measures shall be included in the
study including but not limited to building setbacks from the westerly pwperty
line, walls, landscaping, building orienutfion .and building design..-.These
mitigation measures shall reduce ~e maximum-interior noise level to 45 Ldn and
the exterior noise level to 65 Ldn.
36.
37.
Mitigation measures shall be incorporated into the project design including but not
g gn. These mitigation measures shall reduce
the impact to a level of insignificanCe as determined by the Planning Director.
The entrance gate~ to the private roads in the multi-family senior complex, ff pz~sed,
shah be set~cir sufficiently to allow for stacking of cars to' avoid blocking the right-of-
way. This condition shah be complied with prior to approval of the Plot Plan. '
A pedestrian fzien~y circtdation system shah be designed to separate the pede. s~d,n and
aura citcuhtions by linking parking lots builtfrog and reaza~on azeas
paving, cross walks, lighting, !nnds~a~ and signage. tog.ether by accent
s~'r~~,n-m.~ , 27
38.
43.
39.
40. The development of this project shaH' comply w'fat Development Agreement No. 92: 1.
PUBLIC WORgg DEPARTMENT
The following are the Depamnmt of Public Works Conditions of Approval for this project, and
shall be completed at no cost to any Govu~mm Agency. All questions regarding the true
meaning of the conditions shall be ~ to the ayg,~pahte staff person of the Department of
Public Works.
It is understood that the Subdivider has correctly shown on the tentative map all existing and
proposed ear~Anents,. traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage courses, and their
omission may require the project to be x~submill~ for further rt~iew and revision.
PRIOR TO RECORDATION OF THE FINAL MAP:
41.
42.
Pursuant to Seaion 66493 of the Subdivision Map Act, any subdivision which is pan of
an existing. Assessment District mug comply with the requirements of said section.
As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
- Rancho California Water District;
- '- Eastern Municipal Water DiStrict; A/~...'
- Riverside County Flood Control district; \ ·
- City of Temecuh Fire Bureau; '
Planning Department; ' \ '
- Riverside County Health Depamneat; .
- CATV Franchise; .
- Parks and Recreation Department;
- General Telephone; .
- Southera C, aliforni~ Gas Company.
All mad easements and/or sweet dedications shall be offered for dedication to the public
and shall continue 'in force until the City accel~ or abandom such often. All
dedications shall be free from all enoanbrances as appmved by the Depamnent of PUblic
Works.
swr,~-nz?sa4rru. pc ,p, 28
45.
46.
47.
48.
Pauba Road and Rancho Vista Road shall be impnmved with a half-width of 32 feet of
asphalt concrete pavemeut, or bouds for the street inxpmvements may be posted within
the dedicated right-of-way in accordance with City Standard No. 102, (88'/64')L'
Iu the eveut road or off-site right-of-way are required to comply with these couditious,
deveJopcr shall euter intd au agrccmcnt with the City for the acquisition of such e~cjmcnt
at the developor's cos~ pursuant to Government Code Section 66462,5, .which shall be
~: no cost: to the C'ny.
Vehicular access shall be zestricted on Pauba Road and lancho V'~a Road and so noted
on the final map with the excelxion of access points and su~ iat~tlom as shown on
An easement for ajoint use driveway between shah be ~ betwe, mparcels 3 and
4 prior to approval of the Final ~ or issuance of builcting permits, whichever occurs
fu'st.
boundary. All offers of de~i~tion and conveyances shall be submined and rccordecl as
directed by the Dcpamncnt of Public Works.
d shall be enforceable by the City. The CC&R's shall be reviewed and aleroved by
The CC,~cR's shall be prepared at the developer's s01e cost and expense.
The CC&R's shall be in the form and couteut approved by the Director of
Plannine City Pn~ineer and the City Anomey, and shall include such provisions
as are ~uired by this approval and as said officials deem uecessary to protect
the interest of the City and its residcuts.
The CC&.R's and Articles of Incorporation of the Ptolx,,ty 0wncr's Association
are subject to the approval of Planning, Department of Public Works, and the
City Attorney. They shall be rccorded concurrent with the final map. A
recorded copy shall be provided to the City.
Thc CC,&.R's shah provide for the e~ective establishment operation,
s~r~n,a~r~m,rrac~c ,p 29
The CCZr~'s shall provide tim the p. olx~ty shall be developed, cpcnu~ and
maintained so as not to crm~ a public n-i~nCC.
The CC.&R's shall provide that if the pmpcaty is not maintained in the condition
required by the CCd~R's, then the City, after making due dem~-d and giving
reasonable notice, may enter the.piopczty and. lzrform, at the owner's sole
expelBe, any mninRmmnCe z~lliz~,d ~ b~ th~ CCd~R's or the City
OrdinsmCeS. The. p/olx, aty shah be Irabject to s fiefl in favor of the City to secure
any such expense not promp~y reimbursed.
1. All parkways, open areas, 'onsite-slopes. and innrJsc~ing shall be
permanemly maintained by the association or other means ~ble to
.~~~2.~ City.' Stlah pipof of this msuintemsunce_ ~ be submitted to Planning
the Depaztment of PubfiC Works prior to ism,~-ce Of building punnits.
· ~pwcal access casements and maintenance agreements ensuring access
" "all parcels and joint mnintemnnce of all roads drives Or parking areas
be'p.-o~ by CC&R's or by deeds'and shall be recorded
concurrent with the map, or prior to the iSS.nnce Of btl~ding permit where
no map is involved.
50.
The subdivider shall construct or post security and an agreement shall be executed
-guaranteeing the construction of the following public improvements in conformance with
appficable City standards.
Street improvements, including, but not limited to: pavement, curb and gutter,
sidewalks, drive approaches, street fights, signing-, striping, and other traffic
control devices as ap~ropzlate.
B. Storm drain facilities.
Landscaping (street.parkway and slope protection).
Sewer and domestic water systems..
51.
E. Undergrounding of proposed utility distribution lines if required.
The street design and improvement concept of this project shah be coordinated with
adjoining developments.
52.
Street fights shall be provided along streets adjoining the subject site in accordance with
the requirements Of OrdinsmCe No. 461 and as approved by the Depamnent of Pubtic
53.
Prior to recordation of the final map, the deyeloper shah deposit with the Deparunent of
· Pubtic Works a cash sum as established, per lot, as mitigation towards traffic signal
impacts. Should the developer choose to defer the time of payment of traffic signal
S~STAFPXPI'~/314TTM. pC
30
54.
55.
56.
57.
58.
59.
61.
62.
63.
mitigation fee, he my enter into a written agreement with the City deferring said
payment to the time of im,-,~. of a building permit
Aft-street and driveway ctmcdi,,c int~om slnll be at 90 degrees or as spproved by
the Depamnent of Public Works.
hnlnevemes plans shall he based upon a ceutcdi~ profile e~te, u~inC a mlnlmUDl Of 300
feet beyond t!~ project bO. ndsrles at a grade and alignment as approved by the
Department of Public Works.
A minimum centerline street grade shall be 0.50
An driveways shah conform to the applicable City of Temecuh standards and shah be
shown on the street improvement plans in accordance with City Standard 207A and 401
(curb sidewalk).
The subdivider shah subnxit two ('2) prints of a co-.va~Jznsive grading plan to the
Department of Public Works either prior to tec~ldallon of the final map or prior to
grading permit. The plan shall comply with the Uniform Building Code, Chapter 70,
and as may be additionally pwvided for in these Conditions of Approval. The plan shall
be drawn on 24" x 36" mylar by a Registered Civil Engineer.
A geological report shall be ~ by a qualified engineer or geobgist and submitted
as directed by the Deparunent of Public Works at the time of application for grading plan
check.
The subdivider shall submit two (2) copies of a soils report to the Deparunent of Public
Works at the time of application for grading plan check. The report shall address the
soils stability and geological conditions of the site.
A drainage study shall be submiu~ to and approved by the Depamnent of Public Works.
All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the Departmm' of Public Works.
On-site drainage facilities, located outside'of road right-of-way, shah be contained within
drainage easements shown on the final map. A note shah be added to the final map
stating "Drainage easements shah be kept free of buildings and obstruction."
Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drnin:!Ee
entering the protnly from adjacent areas. '
The subdivider shall protea downsUeam pwpcaties from damages caused by alteration
of the drainage patterns; i.e., concentration or diversion of flow. Protection shah be
pwvided by constructing adequate drainage facilities, including enlnrging existing
facilities or by securing a drainage easement.
The developer shall record an Environmental Constraint Sheet de-line~utlng the area within
the lO0--year floodplain. ' '
S~rrAI~I4TrM.InC
31
Prior to final map, tie subdivider shaH' notify tie City's CATV Franchises of the Intent
to Develop. Conduit shah be installed to CATV' Staa(Jazds It time of street
in?.provementso
PRIOR TO ISSUANCB OF GRADING PERMITS:
67.
68.
Prior to i.Q~mnce of a ~ pe331~ d~oper must comply with the requirements of
the National. Pollutant Disc~ mimi,mt~m System (NPDHS) permit from the State
Water l~sources Control Board. No Fadi~c shan. be .p~fmiU~ until a I~PDHS clearance
69.
Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and an
encroachment permit shall be obtained from the Depamnent of Public Works.
70.
A grading permit shall be obtained froan the Department of Public Works prior
commencement of any grading outside of tlz City-mnlnu, lned road right-of-way.
7'1.
No grading shah taiz place prior to all related improvement plans being substantially
complete, appropriate clearance lette~ have been obtained, and approval of the grading
plan has been granted by the Department of Public works.
72.
If grading is to take place between the months of ~ and April inclusive, erosion
control and runoff mitigation plans will be requited. All plans shall be submitted with
appropriate notes as directed and approved by the Department of Public Works.
73.
Prior to any grading permits being issued a flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The
charge shah equal the prmmiling Area Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of
new development. The charge is payable to the Flood Control District and proof of
payment must be submitted to the City prior to issuance of permits. If the full Area
Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already credited to this pfopc~ty, no new
charge needs to be paid.
A permit from the County Flood Control Distria is r~qu~ircd' for work within their right-
of~way. ' · ·
PRIOR TO BUrr-r~ING PERMrF:
74,
75.
A precise grading plan shall be sub~___~ to the Department of Public Works for review
and approval prior to the developtnent of any parcel. The building pad shall be certify!
by a registered Civil Engineer for location and elevation, and the Soils Engineer shall
issue a Final Soils P, cpon addressing compaction and site conditions.
Grading of the subject property shah be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code,
City Grading Standards and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be
in substantial conformante with the approved rough grading plan.
swr^Fn.~.~m.pc n* 32
76.
ulxm te p. opc, iy or project, inc],uting ilm for Usffic and public faciiiiy miiigalion as
re~.uired under ~he EIR/Ne~Xive Declar~on for time projecL The fee'~o be paid shall
be-in te amoum in effec~ sX/e lime of payment of tlz fee. If an inierim or final public
facility mifil~6on fee or diraici has not been finally established by the dale on which
shall ~xet~e az A~.xmaz~ fur lmymms of Publk Faciliiy fee, a copy of which has been
provided Io d~'velctmer. Com~, wit eset-mi,!g this A/rmemeni, developer shall
pos~ securily io secure. psymms of it~ Public Faciliiy fee.. The mount of lhe security
s~s, be $2.00 per '.square foo~, mX Io eucceed $10,000. Devel~ undermXuds ~ sai'd
Agreement may require the payment of fees in excess of those now estimated (assuming
developer will waive any fight to .promst the provisions of this Condition, of this
Agreement, the formation of any uaifxc impact fee district, or the process, levy, or
collection of any traffic mitip"on or.URic impact fee for this project; provided that
developer is not waiving its right ~o protest the xmmsonabbmess of any traffic impact fee,
and the mount thereof.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CI~IlFICATES OF OCCUPANCY:
Construct full street improvements including but not iimitn4 tO, curb and gutter, A.C.
pavement, sidewalk, drive appxuaches, parkway trees and street lights on all interior
public streets.
78.
Existing city roads requiring construction shall remain Open to traffic at all times with
adequate detoun during construction. Traffic control plans shah be Ixovided as directed
by the Department of Public Works, and may be required to be prepared by a registered
Civil Engineer.
TranSportation ~-r~Fineering
PRIOR TO RECORDAT/ON OF THE FINAL MAP:
79.
A'siguing and striping plan shah be designed by aregistered Civil Eugineer and approved
by the Department of Public Works for Pauba Road and Rancho Vista Road and shall be
included in the street improvement plans.
80.
Prior to designing any of th~ above plans, conuU Transpon~on Engineering for the
design requirements.
81.
Bus bays wffi be provided at all existing and firmre bus stops as determined by the
Depamnent of Public Works..
swr~,evM. w: ~ 33
PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ANY ENCROACHMENT PER,MITS:
82.
· a:/d approved by the City ~,~L, ineer for any street closure and demur or other disruption
to traffic circulation as mluired by the Det}mmxent of Public Works.
PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF OCCUPANCY PERMITS:
83, All signing and striping shall be instnned per the approve! signing and striping plan,.
84. Landscaping shall be' limitai in the .cOrner cut-off area of all ~ons and adjacent
to driveways to provide for minimum sight di-~nnC~.
July 1, 1992
COUNTY OF R]VERS]DE
HEALTH SERVICES AGENCY
9851 Magrsta * RSverside, CA 92503
{714) ~58-7808
CITY OF TEMECULA
43174 BuSiness Park' Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
ATTN.- Saied Naaseha
RE; TENTATIVE TRACT NAP NO. 27314z BEING A PORTION OF THE
RANCHO ;b--~UI.A, ASSRANTED BY U.S. 80Vr~,IJ~ICNTTO LUIS
VIBNES BY PATENT DATED 1-18-19b0, AS SHOWN BY LZBER 19 PASE
37, RECORDS OF ~tN DIEGO COUNTY, AN PARCELS 1,29&3 OF
PARCELl ~ B3/97-100 RECORD8 OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, LOCATED
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALZFDRNIA,
(4 LOTS)
Dear Gentlemen:
.The Department ~ Environmental Health has reviewed
Tentative Tract Map No. 27314 and recommends:
A water system shall be installed according to plans and
· sPecifications as approved by the water company and the
· Health Department. Permanent prints of the plans of the
water system shall be submitted in triplicate, with a
minimum scale not less than one inch-equals 200 feet, along
with the original drawing to the County Surveyor. The
prints shall show the internal pipe diameter, location of
valves and fire hydrants; pipe and joint specifications, and
the.size of the mai. n at the junction.of the new system to
the existi.ng system. The .plan.s. shallcomply in al'l respects
with Div. 5, Part 1, Chapter ? of the California Health and
Safety Code, California Administrative Code, Title 11,
Chapter 16, and General Order No. 10~ of the Public
Utilities Commission of the State of California, when
applicable. The plans shall be signed by a registered
engineer and water company with the following certification:
"I certify that the design of the water system in Tract Map
27314 is in accordance with the water system expansion plans
of the Rancho California Water District and that the water
services, storage, and distribution system will be adequate
to provide water service to such Tract Map."
C714) 351-50~1
City of Temecul a
Page Two
A. ttn: Saied Naaseh
~ul y 1, 1992
Th£s certification.does not Constitute a guarantee thlt it
wi. ll supply water to such TraCt Map at any specific.
quantities, flows Dr pressures for fire protection or any
other purpose".- This certification shall be signed by a
responsible official o~ the water company. The plans must
be submitted to The County Surveyor's O~fice to review at
least two weeks prior to the reouest for the recordation o+
the final maD,
This subdivision has a statement from Rancho California
Water District agreeing to serve domestic water to each and
every lot in the subdivision on demand providing
satisfactory financial arrangements are completed with the
subdivider. It will be necessary for financial arrangements
to be made prior to the recordation of the final map.
This subdivision is within the Eastern Municipal Water
District and shall be connected to the sewers of the
District. The sewer system shall be installed according to
plans and specifications as approved by the District, the
County Surveyor and the Health Department. Permanent prints
of the plans of the sewer system shall be submitted. in
triplicate, al6ng with the original drawing, to the County
Surveyor. The prints shall show the internal pipe diameter,
specifications and the size of the sewers at the junction of
the new system to.the existing system. -A single plat
indicating location of Sewer lines and water lines shall be
a portion of'the sewage .plans and profiles.
The plans shall be signed by a registered engineer and the
sewer district with the +oilowing certification: "I certify
that the design of the.sewer system in Tract Map No. 27314
is in accordance with the sewer system expansion plans of
the Eastern Municipal Water District and that the waste
disposal system is adequate at this time to treat the
anticipated wastes from the proposed Tract Map."
City o~ Temecu] a
Page Three
A.~tn: Sai ed Naaseh
July 1, 1992
The D]anS must. be submitted ta the County Survevor's Office
to review atl.east t~ weeks nrior to the reouest ~or the-
retardation o~.the ~tnal maD.
It will be necessary ~er ~inancial arrangements to be
completely ~inallzed prior to recordation o~ the final map.
It will b~ necessary ~or the annexation proceedings to be
completely ~inalized prior to the recordation o~ the ~inal
map.
.Sincerely,
m/ Martznez, .H.S. IV
Department o-F Environmental Health
SM:dr
GLENJ.
FIRE
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
FIRE DEPARTMENT
2IOWF--STSAN~AVENUEopERRI$,~~~
(714) 657-3~3
MAY 4 :. 1992
TO; CITY OF TEMECULA
ATTEN~ PLANNING DEPARTMENT
RE: TENTATIVE TRACT 27314
CHANGE OF ZONE No. 21
AMENDED No.I
With respect to the review and/or approval of the .above refer-
enced project, the Fire Department has no comments or conditions
regarding the tract map and will address all necessary Fire
Protection measures when the plot plan or project developement
plan is reviewed.
All questions regarding the meaning of conditions shall be re-
ferred to the Planning and Engineering Staff.
RAYMOND H. REGIS
Chief Fire Department Planner
by ~/~
Michael E. Gray,
Fire Captain Specialist
~INDIOOFIkl(],
79-733 Couna.'r Ckb Drlv~Suie F. lndio, CA r2201
(619) 3424886 · FAX (61~) .5.2072
PLANNING DIVISION
3760 12eh Saett, Ri~CA Y/~OI
('714) 2754777 · FAX (714) ..t69.7451
R~C[IV~D c"~"~'~-c~,''' ---
1992 :--.,~ 13 1992
(Da~e)
RIverside County Health Department
c/o Albert A. Wbb Associates
3788 NcCray Street
R~verslde, CA 9z506 -
'Gentlemen:.
· ~k,,a,l~ e ~, m'&lele A/iiO~IAT[",
,..,
Availability of $anttary Seer Service for Tentative Parcel Nap 273:I4
Re:
k/e hereby advtse ;you relathe ~o the availability of santtary seer service
for the above referenced proposed development as follows:
The property to be occupied by the subject proposed development:
Z5 PRESERTT. Y LOCATig) w~thln the boundary lines of thts Dtsl;rict's
/'X~ ~mprovement Dlstr~c~ No. U-8 and Is e119161e to recetve sanitary
seer servtce, '
~ NUST BE ANNEXED. to th~s Otstrtct's Zmprovement Dtstrtct No.
'fo]lo~ng wii{ch tt w111 be e1191ble to receive santtary seer
IIrvt ce,
/'"7 .liST BE ZNCLUDED tn a new Dlstr~ct Improvement d~strtct, assess-"'
-- merit dtStr~Ct or other program to be formed and Implemented for.
the Purpose of providing santtary sewer facilities and service
for the general area wtthtn which th~s proposed development ts
located, following which tt w~71 be eltgtble ~o recetve sanitary
seer $erv~ cet
Provided:
The developer. completes all necessary-ffnanc.lal 'and other
2)
2) That no LZIIFTTNG CONDZTZONS extst wh(ch ARE B~TgND thts DZSTRZCT'S
CONTROL or C/Olllui ~sl: CObl i:PPcCIIVELT and/or reasonabl satlsfi
Zf you have any questions or comments regarding ~he foregoing, do not hesitate
to contact thts off(ca,
Assistant Dfrector of Customer Servfce
z~:il %: p,.~ Office Fk~ R.~O0 . San.Ira:into. C, liforni: 92~R I-14.100 · Telephone ~71~ 925-76T(~. F=x ~71.h 929432~?
~('Jin Ofi~&~: .'DIS .~. ~n)m~nm .qffeef. ~n.lac'imn · Customer .%~'ic~'E~ineerini t~nnec 140 F. Qa'idand Avenue. Hornet.
Names and Addresses of Znvolved Part4es:
Involvement Name
Owner of Property
L~nfteld School
Address
31950 Pauba Road
Teeer~la, CA 92590
-Developer
.1.
Developer's Eng~aeer
Albert 'A. i/ebb Assoc.
RIvet-side. CA
Generel Locatton of the tnvolved property: North std~ of Pauba Rnael.
B~ief legal des=rtptton of the ~nvolved property:
Tentative Par~l ma ?7.q14
Area 96.1 (in acres)
Number of proposed lots/parCels 4 Parcels
Estimated number of delllng units (or equivalent)
Other pertinent informatIOn
Zoned Sentor CSttzen. Conv, le~cent
Small scale map of the subject proposed development
I~..,'d .f ]-hn,ctor~.
(',rob/F. Ko
Ralph H. Daily
~aney K. HuMh~
Je~y L Mink~
~ D. Pele~n
Hieha~ I). Nte~ey
John F.
~. P. '~oh" [~mon~
Kenneth ('. I~ty
Pe.~- R. ~uck
MrCormWk. Kidman
& Hehren~
Mr. Saied Naas~h
City of Temecuh'
Plnnnhlg Dcparllllellt
43180 Businert Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92390
Water Avm'iability
Tentative Tract Map 27314
Change of Zone 21
Dear Mr. Naa~eh:
Please be advised that the above-referenced property is located within the
boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD). Water service,
therefore, would be available upon completion of financial arrangements
between RCWD and the property owner.
Water ava~nbflity would be contingent upon the property owner signing an
Agency Agreement which assigns water management rights, if any, to RCWD.
If you have any. questions, please contact Ms. Senga Doherty.
Sincerely,
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT
Steve Brannon, P. E.
Manager of Development Engineering
51:aJ16?.IF186
co: Sengn Doherty, Engineering Technician
Itmneho Callfertile Water DMtrit, t
.
2~nl~l Ih;,, ]~,NJi| . |'--t ()fih~- |J.x .~NII7 * Te.mmihl. ('alifiifllia !r'.,rKq~llOI7 · ,714,GTei-IlOl · FAX t714s676-1~1.:i
March 2, 1992
RIVERS/DE TRANSIT AGENCY
1825 THIRD STRET, llVB:BE)E. CA 925073484, BUS. 1'714) 884-0850 FAX [714] 684-1007
Saled Naaseh
Pinning Departmen~
48174 Business Park Drive
Temeoula, CA 92590
RE: Tr 27314
Dear Saisd:
We do not currently Wovlde em4ce to the site mentione above but based on the size of the
project ancl our own plans forfuture gRxeth, we m requesting that a bus tumout ora pad for a ~
Ideal site for the bus turnout wou:d be on northside mr of Pauba Road adjacent to Parcel 3 just
before main entrance to the senior citizen housing.
If possible, we would also like to request that pedestrian wa!kwaim and wheelchair curb be
pmvidad near the turnout location specified above. I can indicate the exact location for the
turnout as the project progresses.
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this project. Your efforts to keep us
updated on the status of this request will be very much appreciated. Please let us know when this
project will be completed.
Should you require additional inlorrnmion or spedrr, alions, plea don't hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely, ..
Barbara A. Bray
Transit Planner
SS~sc
PDEV #151
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
REFERENCE:
SltAWN ~ -~ON
DII~,CTOR OF COMMUN1T~
AUGUST 12, 1~)2
TENTA~ TRACT NO. 27J14, AMRNDJ,mNT NO.2
set forth in the City of Tem~,~,, Condi~ohs.of Appmva~ and reco."i-ends APPROVAL
of Tentative Tract Map No. 27314, Amendment No. 2, subject to the developer or his
assignee conforming to the TCSD Quimby Ordinance No: 4150.93 as attached.
All questions regarding the mpning of the nt~ched conditions shall be referred to the
TCSD.
Beryl Yuino q,
Debbie Ubnosk~
TEMEC LA COMM rrn' S mWCES msT cr
Prior to the recordafion Of the final map, the applicant or his assignee, shall offer for dedication
2.3 acres of parkland and execute a Letmr of Agreement with the TCSD, to construct a Senior
Center Facility and required parking in accordance with City Standards and the Development
Agreement.
All proposed slopes, open space, and parkhnd intended for dedication to the TCSD for
maintenance purposes shall be identified on the final map by numbered lots and indexed to
identify said lot numbers as a propo~ TCSD maintenance areas.
Exterior slopes (as defined as: those slopes contiguous to public streets that have a width of
or greater), shall be offered for decli~tlon to the TCSD for maintenance purposes following
Compliance to existing City Standards and completion of an application process. All other slopes
shall be maintained by an established Home Owners Association (HOA).
ATTACI~VH~FF NO. 4
~l'I~
· CITY OF TEMECULA
L
V"l~ INITY
CASE NO.: Development Agreement No. 92-1, Change of Zone No~ 21, Teamfive Parcel Map
No. 27314, Amendment No. 2 '
ExHmrr: A VICINITY MAP
P.C. DATE: August 3, 1992
CrrYOFTEMECULA
SWAP - Exhibit B
l
· I
ZONING - Exhibit C l)*~.o.on: R-R
Case No.: Development Agreement No. 92-1, Change of Zone No. 21, Temative Parcel Map No. 27314,
Amendment No. 2
P.C. Date: August 3, 1992
S~'T~I4TTM, pC
CITY OF TEMECULA
/
/
/
/
CASE NO.: Development Agreement No. 92-1, Change of Zone No. 21, Tentative Parcel Map
No. 27314, Amendment No. 2
EX~rB~T: D CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN
P.C. DATE: August 3, 1992
· CITY OF TEMECULA
r-,ENEIML 'NOTES
CASE NO,: Development Agreement No. 92-1, Change of Zone No. 21, Tentative Parcel Map
No. 27314, Amendment No. 2
EXHIBrr: E TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 27314, AMEND. NO. 2
'P.C. DATE: August 3, 1992
CITY OF TEMECULA
GENERAL NOTES
/
/~"7"
CASE NO.: Development Agreemat No. 92-1, Change of Zone'No. 21, Tentative Parcel Map
No. 27314, Amendment No. 2
EXHIRIT: F
' P.C. DATE: August 3, 1992
s~'T~14'r'rMJ~c
CHANGE OF ZONE NO. 21
CITY OF TEMECULA
Independant Living Unit8
Linfieid Village
CASE NO.: Devdopment Agreement No. 92-1, Change of Zone No. 21, Tentative Parcel Map
No. 27314, Amendment No. 2
Exm~rr: G1 CONCEPTUAI~ ELEVATIONS
'P.C. DATE:.-August 3, 1992
CITY OF TEMECULA
Congragate Care Facilities
Linfield Village
CASE NO.: Development Agreement No. 92-1, C~-,,ge of Zone No. 21, Tentative Parcel Map
No. 27314, Amendment No. 2
EXHm~: G2 CONCEPTUAI~ ELEVATIONS
· P.C. DATE: August 3, 1992
S~rAPPRPIM7314TTM.pC yaw
CITY OF TEMECULA
Independant Living Units
Linfield Village
~Fenieculla,
CASE NO.: Development AFeenent No. 92-1, Chm, f,e of Zone No. 21, Tentative Parcel Map
No. 27314, Amendment No. 2 o
EXHIBIT: G3 CONCE~AL ELEVATIONS ~
- P.c. DATE: August 3, 1992
-_.___
ATTA~ NO. S
INITIAL ENV[RO~AL STUDY
swr~nx~rra~c ,p 36
crrY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
INITIAL i2~'IRONM!~'TAL fflI1DY
H
· BACKGROUND
Name of Proponent:
Number of Proporator:
31~j0 Psnba'Road
T~fls. CA 9.~92
3. Dine of Envirozm~ml~
Assessment:
J.m~-?0. 1~2
CFFY OF ~CUI .&
5. Name of Proposal,
if applicable:
6. Location of Proposal:
N/A
S. wro~mdsd by Panba Road ro ltae south and Rancho
Vi~ Road m ~ nnt~ and. 700 feet east of Msrprita
Road
ENVIO~AL IMPACTS
(Explanations of all answers are provided on allached sheets.).
1. Earth. wnl the proposal resuh in:
Yes Nay. t No
-b..
Unstable earth c~nditiom or in
changes in geologic substrunnnss?
D ru iom cornpat-
lion or overcoverin~ of ~he soil?
Substantial change in topography
or ground_ sin'face relief features?
The destruction, wvering or modi-
fication o~ any unique geologic or
physical features?
X
X
swrApm,n~a4rn4.pc ,p 37
Any substantial increase in wind or
whey_ erosion of mils, either on
or off sire?
of beach ssnds, ordmges in
v~,~tm, deposition or erosion
which may mod~y the 'dznnel of a.
river or stream or the'bed of the '.
ocean or any bay, inlet or lake?
Exposure of people or propmy
to geologic b---his such as earth
quakes, landslides, windSlideS,
ground failure, orsimilarhazards?
Air. Will the proposal result in:
Substantial air emissions or
deterioration of ambient air
qu fl.
The creation of objectionable '
odon?
Alteration of air movement,
moisture, or t~,supcntore, or any
change in cllmn~__-, whether locally
or re2iona!ly?
Water. Will the proposal result in:
Substantial changes in currents, or"
the come or direction of water.
movements, in either marine or
fresh waters?
Substantial changes in absorption
rates, drainage p_~____-~m, or ~he
rate ncl amount of surface runoff?.
Alterations to the come or flow
of flood waters?
Change in the amount of surface
water in any water body?.
X
M.y_b No
X
_ X
_ X
_ X
X
_ X
swr~.m, ruTs~,rra~c v, 38
he
Dischsr~e iso surfzce wsers, or
in any altersion of surfu wsua
qu ity, iuc udinS, but nmi
to, w,,qu~ dissolved oxyZea
orturbidizy?
Altmlianofibedireaionorrse
of flow of 2round wsers? .
wmm, either throu~ direct sddi-
~ons or withdrawsIs, or timraSh
isac~,ptio. n of an squifer by cuts
or exsmvZiom?
Substmzial reduction in ~ amounx
of w~_~ otherwise nsilsble for
public wazer supplies?
Exposure of people or property to
water relsed huards such ms flood-
ins or tidal waves?
Phnt Life. Will th~ proposal result in:
de
ChsnZe in the diversity of species,
or number of my rimire species of
~rmss, crops, rand mqufic plms)?
Reduction of the numbers of any
uaique~ rare, Or endangered 'species
of plhnts? ..
Introduction of new species of
plants inw an area of native
vegetation, or in a barrier to the
normal replenlshme~t of existing
species?
Subsuunial reduction in acreaZe
of any sZriculmral crop?
Maybe
X
X
X
s~An, z~z,rm.~ ,v,, 39
10.
AnimalLife, Willthepropoulrmult
in:
a.
or numbers of say species of msimais
(birds, land animals inch,dinf rep-
tiles, fish sad ,h4l~,~ bmhh:
· ozT_~mien-t or imeca~
of animals?
Der~rioranon ~o exi~i~ rmh or
wildlife habitat?
Noise. Wi/l the propoul result in:
a. Increases in existing noise levels?
F-xpmtwe of people m ~ mi~
levels?
Light snd Clare. Will the proposal
produce substantial new light or Slare?
Land Use. Will the proposal result in a
substantial alteration of the present. or
planned land use of an area?
Natural Resources. Will the proposal
result in: '. -
Substantial increase in the rate of
use of any natural resources?
Substantial depletion of any non-
m~w~le nmm~l resource?
Risk of Upset. W~l the proposal
involve:
A risk of an explosion or the release
of hazardous substances ('including,
but not limited to, oil, pesticides,
chemicals or radiation) in the evm
of an accident or upset conditions?
X
X
X
X
swt~s47tu.x,c vsw 40
11.
12.
13.
14.
Possible ~f~re~:e with m emer$-
ency response plan ~
~on pl~?
Popuhfion. W'ffi the proposal
growth rse of the human populslon of
existing housing or cx~te s deuand for
additional housing?
Trazspomfioa/C~oa. Will the
proposal result in:
Effects on existing psrking radii-
ties, or demand for new parking?.
Subslm~tial im,nSa upon existing
transporUstion sysunns?
Alterations w preses~ pmxerns of
circulation or movement of people
sad/or goods?
Alterations to wnt__s!t)onle, rail or
air traffic?
Increase in traffic hazards W moWr
vehicles; biCyclisls or 'pedestriaus?
Public Services. Will the proposal have
substantial effea upon, or result in a
need for new or altered govemmemal
services in stay of the following mess:
a. Fire protection?
b. Police protection?
Schools?
Parks or other recreational
facilities?
X
X
_ X
_ X
swr~~4rm.l,c ,=,, 41
15.
16.
'17.
18.
Msln~,.~ce of public facilities,
includinZ rosds?
Xmra. WmSe'Proposdresultin:
a.
Use of s~tbst.ntisl mnounm of fuel -
or enerZy?
be
Subsumtial inchrose in dinhand
uponexisth sourcasoranetS ,
or require the development of new
Ultlities. Will the proposal result in
a need for new systmm, or subs-m.-a
alterafiom to the following utilities:
a. Power or natural gas?
b. COmmnniC~tiOnS sysl~in~?
c. Wster~
d. Sewer or septic tanks?
e. Storm waxer drainaSe?
f- Solid waste and disposal?
Human Health. Will .the proposal
result. in:
be
Creation of any health hazard or
potential health hazard (excluding
mental health)?
Exposure of people to potmial
health hazards?
Aesthetics. Will the proposal result
in the obstruction of any scenic vista
or view open to the public, or will the
proposal result in the creation of an
aesthetically offensive site open to
public view?
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
s~sT~su, na~z4~n~,c vsv 42
19.
21.
of e0dsting rmmional oppommities?
Will the propossl result in the
satmarion of or the desmuaign.
· of a prehi~ric or historic
archaeological site? '
WHl the proposal result in sdvene
physical or sesdsetic effects to a
prehistoric or historic building,
sttucn~, or object?.
Does the proposal have the potaxtial
to cause a physical chang~ which
would affect unique ethnic cultural
values?
Will the proposal restrict existing .
religious or sacred uses within the
potential impsct area?
Mandatory Fmdinp 'of Significance.
Does the project have the potential
to degrade the quality of the
environment, substantially reduce
the habitat of a fish or wadlife
species~ cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self
sustaining levels, threaten to -
e]iminst~_ a plant or animal or
eliminate important examples of
the major periods of California
history or prehistory?
Does the project have the potential
to schieve short-term, to the
disadvantage of long-term, environ-
mental goals? (A short-r~rm
impact on the environment is one
which occurs in a relatively brief,
definitive period of time while long-
term impacts will endure well into
the future.)
X
-- X
_ X
_ X
_ X
_ X
Does the project have impacts which
are iadividu~y limis2, b~s cumu-
lsdvely considerable? (A project's
im~,sct on two or more sepsrare
but where tbe effect of the totsd of
flmse ixnpsm on th~ ~n~o.~.~
is
Does the project hav~ ~uviromum~
df~Zs which will caase subsum-
tiai sdven~ eftera on lmman baings,
either dim:tly or indirectly?
~esMa~¢No
X
X
m DIS~ON OF THE .ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
1.a.
l.b.
1 .c.d.
I.e.
1.f.
1.g.
2.b.
No. The proposed project is not anticipated to came changes in geologic submzutmn~
and erem unstable earth conditiom. 'Since this approval does not provide entitlemenu
for structures, ao .mitigSion mmsurm ar~ m,t'e~,-,y st this point. However, the Public
Works Dcl~ is re.s~o. sible for impl~-,~-.ltlon of ,~esssry mitigation measures
prior to issuance of grading permits to insure stable earth conditions for the project.'
Yes. ~ae spproval of this project will not csuse disruptions, displscements, compaction
or overcov~mg of ths soil. 'Ins ul~m,,~ dsvelopment of this site will eventually cause
these conditiom. 'However, these eonditlom w~l not mm a substantial impact on the
environment as no substantial changes in topography are neeespry.
No. The project aim does not comin uniq~ geologic or physical features as determined
by a site impection. Thersfors, no subs,-,~-: changes in topography or Found surface
relief features will result. There is no substantial environmemal impact.
Maybe. The ultinu~ bu~dout of the projut may result in wind and water erosion of
soils as a result of g~ading. However, standard mitigation measures during the grading
stage including watering the dinrbed arm to prevent dust and proper erosion control
during and afmr the grading will reduce the impam to a level of insignificance.
No. The sire drainage for this projest will be channeled through existing improvements
and the runoff from thl; project is not anticipsed to cause any offaim erosion. No
significant impam are auticipmst.
No. The project sire is not located in an earthquake, landslide, mudslide, ground failure
hazard zones as determined in the Soutwest Area Plsn (SWAP). No significant impacts
are anticip~.
No..Tlie construction equipment associated with the construction of the project and the'
traffic generated by the ultimate residents. and user's of the project are the major
contributors to air emissions. However, these impacts are not considered significant
since the construction is for. a ]imi~Mt time Only and the traffic gellerated from a se~liof
housing project is not significant.
No. Objectionable odors are usually'associated with commercial and industrial uses.
Since this-project is exclusively residential in nature there are no significant impacts.
S~$T~I4TTM.pC vgw
2.c.
Water
3.b.
3.c.
3.d.
3.h.
3.i.
No. Due to the size of the project site and its location within the South Coast Air Basin,
the alteration of air movements, moistttre or teanp~ature, or any change in climate would
not occur in conjtmetion with the ulri,,~r~ development of the proposed project. No
si~ulficant impam are anticipated.
No. The ultimge developram of ~be proposed project will not result in increased storm
w~ flows h any mar~ or fresh watsn. No signifitmnt ixntm:ts are anticipher.
Yes. By covering the pwjea site with concrete, asphalt and landscaping, the absorption
ra2 of the site under endsting conditiom would be reduced and the amount of surface
run_off would be increased. The exiting 120 inch storm drain is sufficient to carry this
Maybe. The ultinute buildout of the project will result in construction of dwelling units
in the flood plain. The pads for these dwellings will be elevated above the flood plain.
No significant impam ars ,-,",~ipsed to ts course or flow of flood waters.
No, The construction of impervious surfaces on the project site will not substantially
alter the existing drainage patterm nor proposed drainage pstn:_~.ns becaUe of the size and
locationof the project. No significant impacts are anticipated.
No. Stormwater-runoff and possibly irrigation runoff from the proposed projea would
ultimately flow into the Santo Margarita River. Runoff pollutants will be typical of those
of urbanized are, as, including motor oil, pestleida, herbicides and fertilizen. This
im,naa will be mitigamd by the clearance issued by the State Water Resources Comrol
Board. This clearance will insure compliance with the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimi_nation System (NPDES). No significant impam are anticipated.
No. The runoff from the'projea is conveyed to' Murrieta and Temec,,!a Creeks which
flow inw the Santa Margarita River. 'Both Murrieta and Temec~,ia Creeks and the Santa
Margarita River recharge the ground water in the Murrieta-Temecula basin. The runoff
from this project is not antiCipn_t__,_~d_ to change the direction or rate of flow of ground
waters. No significant impacts. are anticipated.
No. The project site is within Rancho Water District and will not draw from the ground
water for their everyday use. Therefore, no significant impam are anticipated.
No. Rancho Water District has indicated the availability of Water to serve this project.
Therefore, there is no potential for substantial reduction in the availability of water. No.
significant impam are anticipated.
Maybe. A portion of the project 'site is within the flood plain. However, the project will
be condifioned to construct the dwelling units above the flood plain limit per the FEMA
standards which will mitigate any impam to people and property from water related
hazards such as flooding. No significant impam are anticipated.
S~STAFFRF~ZB!4TTM,pC vgw
Plant Life
4.a.c.
4.b.c.
Aninud lJfe
5.a.
5.b.
5.c,
NoiSe
6.a.
6.b.
Yes, The Biological ,~-~,~ prepared for the projea site determined existence of
Non-U.S. waters wetland on the si~. The project is co~itlcmod for preserving this
wetland by requiring a flay (5o) foot e-_~,,-~ on e-~ side of the wetlands thereby
preserving the we~iands which will be hgoq~oro_!,_,J into the design of the golf course.
The proj~:t in gmzral will introdu~ a~w species of plsms and will e]iminnt_~ the native
plants present at this tht~. However, none of the existing species are considered
No, The proposed project will not retlnee the nmnlmrs of'any unique, rare, or
endangered species of plants as determined by the Biological Assessment.. The projea
site is not presently being used for agricultural purposes; therefore, no significant impacts
are anticipated.
Pdaybe, The II~dmntm- dfvglopn!~nt of the ll~ B!ay dimlnmm ~OID~ of the native nnimnls
on the site however, some may survive in an urban environrant. The only additions to
the animal life are expected to be household pets. The in~,act of this development is not
considered significant for this category.
No, The biological study recommended a focused K-Rat survey which identified no
Steveo's Kangaroo Rats on the site. No other smsitive or endangered species were
identified on the' site by time biological study. Therefore, no significant impacts are
anticipated.
No. Since there is no significant habitat for any sensitive species other than the wetland
there is no si_~,nificunt impact. The wetlands will be protr, zd .by two fifty (50) foot
easements and will be incorpor~___od_ into the design of the golf course.
No, The ultimate development of the site will not significanfiy increase the existing noise
levels. The.short term impacts are associated with the construction of the project and the ·
long term impacts will mostly result from the tnffic genern_!~ by. this projea. Due te
the size and location of this project these impacts are not considered significant.
Maybe, The proposed project abuts an existing high school stadium. The noise
generated from this stadium is expected to impact at least a portion of the senior housing
project. Since the exact lcr, ation and type of the dwelling units is not known at this time,
a detailed noise study will be required tO mitigate the impacts of the stadium noise on this
project. The mitigntion measures may include building orientation, design features,
landscaping, etc. No significant impacts are anticipated.
S~STAFF3tF/'~i314TTM, pC qw
47
141,ht and Glare
No. The project will not result in a significant increase in the light and glare of the area.
Furthermore, the project will be eonditioned to comply with Mr. Palomar lighting
requlrmms. All lights will be conditioned m be diretrod on site, therefore, reducing
the impact on the mighboring propatios m a level of imiSni~cance.
The light and glare prodm~ from the high school stadimn will impaa this project which
has been conditioned to deal wigs this imr,sX. The wnditions will be enforced at the plot
plan stage and' inciude building ~, tmilding design, setb~, etc.
.land Use
Yes. This project includes a zone change from R-R to R-3. The R-R zoning designation .
permits low density single family development with minimnm ,5 acre lob and a variety
~dc~=mer~iai ,m. es. The R-3 zonin_a desip,,tion will create high density senior homing
supporting uses which will be dicxged by the 'Development Agreement. This
change will not result in a signifiesat ~ because of the low impaa nature of senior
housing. '
Natural Resources
9.a.b.
No. Imple, n~tation of the proposed project would increase the rate of consumption of
both renewable and nonrenewable nemral resources during consmuxion and project
operation. Natural resources consumed during construction would be aggregate
materials, timber, and energy resources for on-site' consu'uaion equipme~ and for
transport vehicles which would bring supplies to the site. At build out, energy resources
required during project operation would include gasoline, nann'al gas for heating and
cooling, electricity for lighting, and al~liances. As all of these resources are readily
available commercially, the proposed project would not have a significant 'impact on
natural .resources.
Risk of Upset
,lO.a.
lO.b.
No. The proposed project is residential in nature and it is' not expected to house any
material with the potential for an explosion or the release of hazardous substance. The
gasoline in the tanks of the residentS' and the visitors' cars and the pesticicles used for
maintenance of the landscaping are not expected to create significant impacts.
No. The proposed project will be reviewed by the Fire D~Eunm at the Plot Plan
stage; therefore, all response time and emergency vehicle turnarounds will be examined
at that stage. No significant impacts are anticipated.
S~T~I4TTM.pC vgw
48
Population
ll.a.
No. The ultim~_e- build out of the project will increase the senior citizen population in
the project vicinity. This increase could be in the form of out of town residents moving
into the city, relocation of Temoa, la residents in the area or a combination of the two.
This impact is not expeaed m be significant.
Housinf
12.
Yes. This project will have a positivs impact on the housing in:the region since it will
provide additional homing for senior citizens. No nerve significant impact is
anticipated. .
Trsnq}ortatio~/Cireslsfion
13.a.c.
~3 .b.
13.d.
13 .f.
Maybe. The project will generate appto~,;~tMe~y 1,610 dally vehicle trips, 130 of which
are expected to occur during the evening peak hour. According to the traffic study, the
major intmecliom impacted by this project will operate. at Level of Service C or better.
No significant impam are anticipated since mitiga~n measures have been incorporated
into the project. These miti_~syion measures include improving Pauba Road and Rancho
Vista Road bordering the project to their ultimate half-section widths as secondary
highways (88 feet right-of-way) in conjunction with development. A painted median with
left turn pockets will. be provided for tratTw on Rancho Vim Road and on Pauba Road
desiring to turn left into the project entrances. The project will be required to participate
in the future construction of off-site capital improvehams through established procedures.
No. The project will not treat, additional dmamd on e=dsting parking facilities since the
proper number of parking spaces will be provided for the size as required by Ordinance
No. 348. Therefore, no significant impacts are anticipated.
No. The development of this project will not cause any alt~/~jons to present pauerns of
circulation or movemint of people and/or goods since the major roads are already
established in the vicinity of the project. Therefore, no significant impacts are
anticipated.
No. This project w~l not cause .alt~aiions to 'waiterborne, rail or air traffic due to the
nature of the project, its geographic location, and local uanspom~on system. Therefore,
no significant impacts are anticipated.
Maybe. Projea-related traffic could create new traffic hazards to motor vehicles,
bicyciists, and pedestrians, both on and off the project size. Points of conflict would be
created as a result of additional poims of ingress and egress along Panba Road and
Rancho Vista Road. -Internal. circulation patterns could also result in potential hszards
to pedestrians.
S~TAFFRFI'~I4TrId.pC v~p
49
The following measures need to be incorporated into the project design to reduce the
impacts of the project to an insignificant level:
The gate for the propreed senior housing should be setback from the Right-of-
.Way to allow ftw proper star, king of ears behind the gate,
Vehicular and pedestrian entri~ ID ti~ projea should be clearly identifiable to
visimn throuSh the use of siSnage, hardscapin~ and
· Circulation within the silt. should be designed to minimi,e coilflit'Is .between
· autOmobiles and psiestrins. ·
A pedestr~ friendly tiesip needs to be incorporated into the projea design
providing adequa~ pedeswian circulation. Aweat paving, crosswalks,
landscaped walkways and adequate lighting should be used to identify and
ew~hnnt'e. perlestriCt wa!i~. ·
Public Sewices
'Considersion should be given to providing safe pedeswian access through
parting areas and fi'om the public street walkways to building entrances.
14.a.
14.b.
14.c.
No, Mitigation fee of $400.00 dollan for each unit will be collected to mitigate the
impacts of this ~lopment on Fire Service, The Fire Department will review the Plot
Plan for this projea in insure adequate senrico. No significant impacts are anticlp,_.t~.
No, The City of Te, necola is contracting litrough the Riverside County Sheriff's
Department for law eatforccataent services. This contract provides for thirty-one sworn
officers and seven non-sworn riBten. Additional services are. provided to the City
through various divisions within the Sheriffs Department. The average respouse time
for priority one calls is 6.5 minutes and according to the Sheriffs Department this
response time is well within industry standards for adequate service levels. The City
intends tO msuintnin a ratio of 1 officer per 1,000 residents. No significant impacts are
anticipated.
No, -The proposed projea is .an .exclusively senior housing project. No school aged
children are anticipated to be gener_.~__ from this projea. No significant impacts are
anticipated.
14.d.
14.e.
No, The proposed project will include a private golf course and other active amenities.
A senior center might also be a part of this project which will create new activities for
the residema. No significant impacts a~e anticipated.
No, The project will cause increased traffic on city streets; however, this is not
considered a significant impact (refer to No. 13).
SXSTAFFRFI'~73147'I-M. pC: v~w
5O
14.f.
Maybe. 'The 'future project residents will be using governmental services such as
libraries; however, a $100.00 per dwelling unit mitigation fee imposed on this project
will mitigate the iml,act. No significant impau:ts are anticipated.
15.a.b.
Utilities
be consuming energy resources. At buildout, energy resources would be required during
project operation, such as gasoline, natural gas and ele~ttlcit~. However, the p.~sed
project .would not resttit ill the rise Of SlVbSrantial alliOU~ of fuel or energy which are.
commercially abundant. No si~ impacts are anticipated.
16.a.b.c.
d.e.f.
No. All the utilities and services are willfin close pfoxlmity to the project site and will
be extended to the project sits with ag,,~,laMs betwere the developer and the individual
Human Health
17.a.b.
Aesthetics
No, The nature of the proposed uses permitted on the project site is not such that they
would create potential health hazards. No significant impacts are anticipated.
18.
Recreation
19,
Maybe, The project will go through further review in terms of architecture and
landscaping when a Plot Plan application is filed. All aesthetics issues will be dealt with
at that stage. At that time close attention shall be given to the impacts, ff any, to the
existing single family dwellings to the north of the projea site and the existing schools
on the west and east of the site. No significant im,nacts are anticipated.
Yes, The proposed project will include a private golf course and other active anmities.
A senior center may also be a pan of this project which will create new activities for the
residents. These impacts are considered positive and will not cause si~ificant ne4ative
impacts.
Cultural Resources
20.a.b.c.d.
No, The proposed project will not have a signifw, am impact on prehistoric or historic
cultural resources according to the Univenity of California Eastern Information Center.
This conclusion was. made upon completion of a Phase I study. A condition will be
imposed on the projea to have a qualified archaeologist present at the time of grading
as required by the F. astvn Information Center.
$XST~I4TTM.pC ~
51
!~VIRO~~ D~.MINAT/ON
On the basis of this ~ evaluation:
I find that the proposed project COUI~ NOT have a significant
effect on the envlromumt, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be
I find that although the proposed ptojea could have a signi-
fica~ effe~ on the envi, ouu~dt, there wiil not be asigni-
ticant effect on this ease because tim mltigs6on u~sut~s
described on aUached sheets and in the Conditions of Approval
have been added to the project.
A NEGATIVE DECLARATION .WILL BE PREPAIsle.
I find the proposed project MAY hsvs a signifim~'sffs:t on
the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT P-BlURT is
required.
June 25 L 1992
Date
X
For
CITY OF T!:~-M'~-CUI-A
S~'eT~!4TTM. PC .
52
ATTA~ NO. 6
DEV~OPS~'~r
53
RECORDED AT THE ~EQUEST OF
City Clerk
City of Temecula
WHEN RECORDED RETURNTO
City Clerk
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
RECEIVED
JUL 3 O 1992
A~'d ............
DEV~LOPIIIIITAGilaEMENT
CITY OF tEllZ~
and
THE LZNFZELD scHooL
'4.5 (7r27/92)
Mib?,XATZON MID DEVBLOPM:BX? AGRB~q.Efi,
Ba;~L'w,,:r,,d
CZTY OF T~4:BCULA
TKB LZXIFZBLD BaliOOL
This Development ("Agreement.) is entered into to be
effective on the date it is recorded with the Riverside County
Recorder (the "Effective Date"). by and-among the City Of
Temecula, a California municipal corporation ("City") and the
persons and entities listed below ( "Owner- ):
THE LINFIELD SCHOOL
A. The legislature of the State of California has
adopted California Government Code Section 65864-65869.5'
("Development Agreement Legislation,,) which authorizes a city to
enter into a binding development agreement with persons having
legal or equitable interests in real property located within a
city's municipal boundaries for the development of such
property.
B, Pursuant and 'subject'to the Development Agreement
Legislation, the City's police powers and City Resolution No.
91-52, City is authorized tO enter into binding agreements with
persons having' legal or"equitable interest in real property
located within the City's municipal. boundaries under which such
property may be developed in the City.
C. In lieu of obtaining approval of a Specific Plen
for the development of the Property, Owner has requested City to
consider entering into a development agreement relating to the
Property.
D. By electing to enter into this Agreement, City
shall bind future members of the City Council of City by the
obligations specified herein and further limit the future
14s~.sOm/e~a
-1-
exercise of certain governmental and proprietary powers of and
members of the City Council.
E. The terms end conditions of this Agreement have
undergone extensive review by the staff of the City and the City
Council of City and have been found to be fair, just and
reasonable.
F. City finds and determines .that it will be in the
best.'int'erests of its citizens end thepublic health, Safety and.
welfareSwill be served by entering 'into 'this Agreement:
G. All of the procedures of the California
Environmental'Quality Act have been met with respect to this
Agreement.
H. City was incorporated on December 1, 1989.
Pursuant to California Government Code Sections'65360 and 65361,
the City has forty-two (42) months following incorporation to
prepare and adopt a general plan. During this 42-month period,
the City may approve development projects without being subject
to the requirement that .its decisions be consistent with the
general plan so long as the findings set forth in Section 65360
and the conditions of approval of the California Office Of
Planning and Research are met.
I. Pursuant to City Ordinance No. 90-4, the City has
adopted the County of Riverside's land use, subdivision and
mitigation fee ordinances as amended by City Ordinance Nos. 90-05
through 92-15. Pursuant. to City Resol-ution No. 90-31, the City
has adopted the Riverside County Southwest Area Community Plan
("SWAP"), as a planning guideline-during the preparation of the
City's General Plan.
J. The City Council of City hereby finds and
determines that:
(1) The City is proceeding in a timely fashion
with the preparation of its general plan.
(2) There is a reasonable probability that the
Project will be consistent with the general
~lan proposal presently being considered.
(3) There is little or no Probability of
substantial detriment to or interference with
the future adopted general plan if the
Project is ultJanately inconsistent with the
plan.
(4). The Project complies with all other
applicable requirements of state law and
local ordinances.
K. Owner is'the fee owner of a ninety-six and nine-'
tenths (96.9) acre parcel of undeveloped land located South of
Rancho Vista Road, east of Temecula Valley High'School and north
of Pauba Road, hereinafter referred to as the "Property- as
described in Exhibit sAs attached hereto and made a part herein
by this reference. This Agreement applies to the development of
a forty-eight and three-tenths (48.3) acre portion of the
Property, comprised of Lots 1-4 of Tentative Parcel Map No.
2.7314.
L. City and Owner desire that the Property be
developed as a Senior Citizen Housing Development as further
described herein.
M. The City Council of City hereby finds and
determines that:
(1) The environmental impacts of this Agreement
have been reviewed and all measures deemed feasible to
mitigate. adverse impacts.thereof have been incorporated into
..the City aPProvals'for.the Project.
(2) No other mitigation measures for
environmental impacts created by the Project, as presently
approved shall be required for development of the Project
unless mandated by law.
.(3) City may, Pursuant to and in accordance with
its rules, regulations, and ordinances, conduct an
environmental review of subsequent discretionary
entitlements for the development of'the Property or any
changes, amendments, or modifications to the Property. The
-3-
City, as a result of such review, may impose additional
measures (or conditions) to mitigate as permitted by law the
adverse environmental impacts of such development
entitlement which were not considered or mitigated at the
time of approval of the Project.
N. Within foray-eight (48) hours of the effective
date of this Ageement,-Owner shall deliver to the Planning
department a check payable to the County'.C~erk in'the amount of
One Thousand Two H~ndred Seventy-Five Dollars (1,275.00)., which
includes the One Thousand Two Hundred Fifty Dollars ($1,250.00)
fee required by Fish end Game Code Section 711.4(d)(2) plus the
Twenty-Five Dollar ($25.00) County administrative fee to enable
the City to file the Notice of Determination required under
Public Resources Code Section 21152 and 14 Cal. Code of
Regulations 15075. If within such forty-eight (48) ho.ur period
the Owner has not delivered to ~he Planning Department the check
required above, this Agreement shall be void by reason of failure
of condition, Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c).
O. City Council of City has approved this Agreement
by Ordinance No. adopted on , 1992, and effective
on , 1992.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the above Recitals
and of the mutual covenants hereinafter contained and for other
good and valuable cons!deration,.the receipt. and sufficiencyo. of
which is' hereby acknowledged, the parties agee:
1. Definitions. In this Agreement, unless the
context otherwise requires:
(a) "Congregate Care Facility" is a congregate
care residential facility developed pursuant to Riverside County
Ordinance No. 460, and Sections 8.1, 8.2, 19.101, 19.102 and
19.103 of Riverside County Ordinance No. 348.
(b) "City" is the City of Temecula.
t5
-4-
14874~ (7/27/92)
(c) 'Development Approvals- means all those
discretionary land use entitlements necessary to develop the
Property, including, but not limited to, zoning changes,
tentative subdivision maps, plot plans, and conditional use
permits.
(d) SDevelopment Exaction- means any requirement
of City'in connection'with or pursuant to any Land Use RegulatiOn
Or DeVelopment Approval for the dedication of' land,.the
construction of improvements or public facilities, or the payment
of fees in order to lessen, offset, mitigate or compensate for
the impacts of development on the environment or other public
interests.
(e) 'Development Plan' means. the development of
the Property as depicted in Exhibit G.
(f) 'Existing Development Approvals- means those
certain Development Approvals in effect as of the effective date
of this Agreement with respect to the Property, including,
without limitation, the 'Existing Development Approvals- listed
in Exhibit B which were approved by the City of Temecula.
(g) "Land Use Regulations- means all ordinances~
resolutions, codes, rules, regulations and official policies of
City, governing the development and use. of land including without
limitation, the Permitted use of land, the density or intensity
of use, subdivision requirements, the maximum height and size of
proposed buildings, the'Provisions'for-reservation or'dedication
of land for public purposes, and the design, improvement and
construction standards and specifications applicable to the
development of the Property which are a matter of public record
on the Effective Date of this Agreement. 'Land Use Regulations-
does not include any County or City ordinance, resolution, code,
rule, regulation, or official policy, governing:
(1)
and occupations ~
(3)
The conduct of businesses, Professions,
Taxes and assessments;
The control and abatement of nuisances;
-5-
(4) The granting of encroachment permits and
the conveyance of rights and interests which provide for the
use of or the entry upon public property;
(5) The exercise of the power of eminent
domain.
(h) "Senior Citizen Housing Development" means a
multi-family development intended for persons 55 years of age or
Older, as further defined at .California Civil Code Section 51.3.
(i)' "Subsequent Development Approvals" means all
Development Approvals required subsequent to the Effective Date
in connection with development of the Property.
(j) "Project" is the development of the Property
with the following specific uses: (i) multifamily senior housing
complex; (ii) congregate care facility; (iii) skilled nursing
faci'lity; (iv) personal care facility, and (v) Seniors' Community
Center; and (vi) a nine (9) hole private golf course.
(k) "Owner".means the person having a legal
interest in the Property;
(1) "Subsequent Land Use Requlation- means any
Land Use Re.gulation adopted and effective after the Effective
Date of this Agreement.
(m) "Property" is the real property referred to
in Exhibit "A".
2. Tnterest of Owner. Owner represents that he has a
legal interest in the Property and.that all other persons. holding
legal or equitable interests in:the Property .are to be bound by
this Agreement.
3. ~xh~bits. The following documents are referred to
in this Agreement, attached hereto and made a part hereof by this
reference:
-6-
Exhibit
Desianat.~on
DesCription
Legal Description
Property
of the
Referred to
~n ParaaraDh
K
B
Existing DevelOpment
Approvals
l(f), 15.2
C
D
Development Schedule
Public Facility Fee
Agreement
9, 10
14.2
E
F
Fee Credit
Deed Restriction
Development Plan
(a)
14.3
10
9
The term of this Agreement shall commence on
the Effective Date and 'shall extend for a period of fifteen (15)
years thereafter, unless this Agreement is terminated, modified
or extended by circumstances set forth in this Agreement or by
mutual consent of the parties hereto.
(b) Should the Owner: (i) fail to obtain all
Subsequent Development Approvals to develop and complete the
Project, or (ii) breach the Development Schedule, Owner agrees to
City amending the land use designation to Low Medium Density
Residential or Institutionall and amending the zoning to Single
Family'Residential (R-l)..
(c) Notwithstanding any other provisions of this
Agreement, upon the saleor lease 6f any lot, dwelling or unit to
a member of the public or other ultimate user, this Agreement
shall terminate with respect to any such lot, dwelling, unit or
space, and such lot, dwelling, unit or space shall be released
and no longer be subject to this Agreement without the execution
or recordation of any further document upon satisfaction of both
of the following conditions:
1~74,5
(1) The lot has been finally subdivided and
individually (and'not in "bulk") sold or leased to a member
of t~he public or other ultimate user; and,
(2} A Certificate of Occupancy has been
issued for a building or the lot, and the fees set forth
under Section 14. of this Ageement have been paid.
Notwithstanding the sale of any individual lot,
dwelling~ unit or space as set .forth herein, the Owner'Shall
remain liable to perform any.and all outstanding obligations,
still unperformed or uncompleted at the time of sale, with
respect to said lot, dwelling, unit or-space required by this
Agreement or as a condition of any development approval. The
owner shall condition the sale and deed sufficiently to ensure
· the completion of said obligations.
5. Ass~anment.
5.1 R~aht to Assign. The Owner shall have the
right to sell, transfer, or assign the Property in whole'or in
part (provided that no such partial transfer shall violate the
Subdivision Map Act, Government Code Section 66410, etS~g~, or
Riverside County .Ordinance No. 460, as the same was incorporated
by reference into the Temecula Municipal Code by Ordinance No.
90-04) to any person, partnership, joint venture, firm, or
corporation at any time during the term of this Agreement;
provided, however, that any such sale, transfer, or assignment
shall include the assignment .and assumption of the rights,_
-duties, and obligations 'arising under-Or from this Agreement and
be made in strict compliance with the following conditions
precedent:
'4 .S Omen)
(a) No sale, transfer, or assignment of any
right or interest under this Agreement shall be made unless
made together with the sale, transfer, or assignment of all
or a part of the Property.
(b) Concurrent with any such sale, transfer
or assignment, or within fifteen (15) business days
thereafter, the Owner shall notify City, in writing, of such
-8-
sale, transfer, or assignment and shall provide City with an
executed agreement, in a form acceptable to the City
Attorney, by the purchaser, transferee, or assignee and
providing therein 'that the purchaser, transferee,.or
assignee expressly and uncondit~onally assumes all the
duties and obligations of the Owner under this Agreement.
Any Sale, transfer, or assignment not made in strict
compliance with the foregoing.conditionS shall constitute a
default by the Owner under this Agreement; Notwithstanding the
failure of any purchaser, transferee, or assignee to execute the
agreement required by Paragraph (b) of this Subsection, the
burdens of this Agreement shall.be binding upon such purchaser,
transferee, or assignee, but the benefits of this Agreement shall
not inure to such purchaser, transferee, or assignee until and
unless such agreement ks executed.
5.2 Release of T~ans~e~.4ng Owner.
Notwithstanding any sale, transfer, or assignment, a transferring
Owner shall continue to be obligated under this Agreement unless
such transferring Owner is given a release in writing by City,
which release shall be provided by City upon the full
satisfaction by such transferring Owner of all of the following
conditions:
(a) The Owner no longer has a legal or
equitable interest in all or any part of the Property except
as.a beneficiary under a deed of trust.
(b) .The Owner is not'then in default under.
this Agreement.
(c) The Owner has provided City with the
notice and executed agreement required under Paragraph (b)
of Subsection 5.1 above.
(d) The purchaser, transferee, or assignee
provides City with security equivalent to any security
previously provided by Owner to secure performance of its
obligations hereunder.
0/'27/92)
-9-
-- .15.3 S-~seauent Ass~anment. Any subsequent sale,
transfer, or assignment after an initial sale, transfer, or
assignment shall be made only in accordance with and subjec~ to
the terms and conditions of ~his Section.
6. N°r~ca~aee P~otec~c~on. ~he pa~cies hereto agree
that this Agreement shall not prevent or limit Owner, in any
manner, at Owner,s sole discretion, from encumbering the Property
or any portion 'thereof or anyimpr0vement thereon'by. any .:
mortgage, deed of trust, or other security device securing
financing with respect to the Property. City acknowledges that
the lenders providing such financing may require certain
Agreement interpretations and modifications and agrees upon
request, from'time to time, to meet with the Owner and
representatives of such lenders to negotiate in good faith any
such request for interpretation or modification. City. will not
unreasonably withhold its consent to any such requested
interpretation or modification provided such interpretation or
modification is consistent with the intent and purposes of this
Agreement. Owner shall reimburse City for any and all of City's
costs associated with said negotiations, interpretations, and
modifications and shall make reimbursement payments to City
within thirty (30) days of receipt of an invoice from City.
Any Mortgagee of the Property shall be entitled to the
following rights and privileges:
(a) Neither. entering into this Agreement nor a
breach of this Agreement shall defeat, render invalid,' diminish
or impair the lien of any mortgage-on the Property made in good
faith and for value, unless otherwise required by law.
(b) The Mortgagee of any mortgage or deed of
trust encumbering the Property, or any part thereof, which
Mortgagee has submitte~ a request in writing to the City in the
manner specified herein for giving notices, shall be entitled to
receive written notification from City of any. default by the
Owner in the performance of the Owner's obligations under this
Agreement.
'4.S Ur27/92)
-10-
34~74,.~
(c) If'City timely receives a request from a
Mortgagee requesting a Copy of any notice of default given to the
Owner under the terms of this Agreement, City shall provide a
copy of 'that notice to the Mortgagee within ten (10) days of
sending the notice of default to the Owner. The Mortgagee shall
have the right, but not the obligation, to cure the default
during the remaining cure period allowed such party under this
Agreement.
'(d) Any Mortgagee who comes into possession of
the Property, or any part thereof, pursuant to foreclosure of the
mortgage or deed of trust, or deed in lieu of such foreclosure,
shall take the Property, or part thereof, subject to the terms of
this Agreement. Notwithstanding any other provision of this
Agreement to the contrary, no Mortgagee shall have an obligation
or duty under this Agreement to perform any of the Owner's
obligations or other affirmative covenants of the Owner
hereunder, or to guarantee such performance, provided however,
that to the exwcent that any covenant to be performed by Owner is
a condition precedent to the performance of.a covenant by City,
the performance thereof shall continue to be a condition
precedent to City's performance hereunder, and further provided
that any sale, transfer or assignment by any Mortgagee in
possession shall be subject to the provisions of Section 6.3 of
this Agreement.
(e) Any Mortgagee who comes into possession Of
the Property, or any portion thereof,'pursuant to subsection (d)
above and who elects not to assume-the obligations of the Owner
set forth herein shall not be entitled to any rights to develop
which have or may have vested as a result of this Agreement.
7. B4nd.~na ~ffect of AGreement. The burdens of this
Agreement bind. and the benefits of the Agreement inure to the
successors-in-interest to the parties to it.
8. Relat~onsh4D of Parties. It is understood that
the contractual relationship between City and Owner is such that
the Owner is an independent contractor and not the agent of City.
-11-
9. .Proiect Zonina. Pursuant to the Existing
Development Approvals, the Project description contained at
Section 16.1 of this Agreement, and the Development Plan, the
Proper=y has been rezoned from Rural-Residential (R-R) to General
Residential (R-3) to permit Project development. The land use
designation under SWAP is presently one (1) acre minimum; under
the new General Plan to be adopted, the Property will likely be.
designated high density residential. 'The rez0ning and proposed
land use designation is conditional upon the completion of the
Project pursuant to the Development Schedule. Any substantial
breach of the Existing Development Approvals, Development
Schedule or Development Plan shall constitute a material breach
of the Agreement.
10. Development Sched, le.
(a) Owner shall develop the Property pursuant to
the Development Schedule contained in Exhibit C.
(b) Concurrently with recording Parcel Map No.
27314,'Owner shall record a deed restriction in substantially the
form of Exhibit F, as to Parcels 1-4 of said Tract, restricting
occupancy in the Project to persons fifty-five (55) years of age
and older.
(c) The parties acknowledge that Owner cannot at
this time predict when, or.the rate at which phases of the
Property will be developed. Such decisions depend upon numerous
factors which.are not within the control of Owner, such as market
orientation and .demand,' interest rates,. absorption, completion
'and other similar factors. Since the California Supreme Court
held in Pardee Construction Co. v. C.~tv of Camaril~o, 37 Ca1.3d.
465 (1984), that the failure of the parties therein to provide
for the timing of development resulted in a later adopted
initiative restricting the timing 0f development to prevail over
such parties, agreement, it iS the parties, intent to cure that
deficiency by acknowledging and providing that the Owner shall
have the right to develop the Property in such order and at such
rate and at such times as the Owner deems appropriate within the
~4.5 Ur27~2)
-12-
exercise of its subjective business judgment, subject only to any
timing or phasing requirements set forth in the Development
Schedule.
11. Hold Hsrmless. Owner agrees to and shall hold
City, its officers, agents, employees and representatives
harmless from liability for d~mage or claims for damage for
Personal injury including death end claims for property damage
which may arise from the direct or'indirect operations/of the .
owner or those of his contractor, subcontractor, agent, employee
or other person actin~ on his behalf which relate to the Project.
Owner agrees to and shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless
the City and its officers, agents, employees and representatives
from actions for damages caused or alleged to have been caused by
.reason of Owner's activities in connection with the Project.
This hold harmless agreement applies to all damages and
claims for damages suffered or alleged to have been suffered by
reason of the operations referred to'in this paragraph,
regardless of whether or not City prepared, supplied, or approved
plans or specifications or both for the Project and regardless of
whether or not the insurance policies referred to herein are
applicable.
Owner further agrees to indemnify, hold harmless, pay
all costs andprovide a defense for' City in any action
challenging the validity of this Agreement or the Project.
12. T..~tiaat~on..-
12.1 Th.~rd Party x.itiaation Concern~na Aareement;
owner shall defend, at its expense,- including' attorneys fees,
indemnify, and hold harmless City, its agents, officers and
employees from any claim, action, or-proceeding against City, its
agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void, or
annul the approval of this Agreement or the approval of any
permit granted pursuant to this Agreement. City shall promptly
notify Owner of any such claim, action, or proceeding' and City
shall cooperate in the defense. If City fails to promptly notify
Owner of any such claim, action, or proceeding, or if City fails
-13 -
to cooperate in the defense, Owner shall not thereafter be
responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless City. City
may' in-..its discretion participate An the defense of any such
claim, action, or proceeding.
12.2 .~v.~ronmen~al'Assurances. Owner shall
indemnify and hold City, its officers, agents, and employees free
and harmless from any liability, based or asserted, upon any act
or omission of Owner, its officers, agents, employees,.'
subcontractors, Predecessors-in-interest~ successors, assigns and
independent contractors for any violation of any federal, state,
or local law,'ordinance or regulation relating to industrial
hygiene, solid or hazardous waste Cr to environmental conditions
on, under or about the Property. Said violations shall include,
but not limited to, soil and groundwater conditions, and Owner
shall defend, at its expense, including attorneys fees, City-, its
officers, agents and employees An any action based or asserted
upon any such alleged act or omission. City may, in its'
discretion, Participate in the defenseof any such action.
13. Third P~rtv ?..~t~oat~on Concernino the General
~J~. City is a newly incorporated city falling within the scope
of Government Code Sections 65360 and 65311 and thus not subject
to the requirement that a General Plan be adopted or that
development decisions' be consistent therewith so long as the City
makes certain findings, which the City has made at Section J. of
this Agreement. Notwit.hstanding these-findings City shall. have
no liability in damages 'under this Agreement for any failure of
City to perform under this Agreement or the inability of Owner to
develop the Property 'as contemplated by the Development Plan of
this Agreement as the result of a judicial determination that on
the Effective Date, or at any time thereafter, the findings made
under Section 6~60 and 6~61 or the future General Plan, are
invalidated or inadequate or not in compliance with law.
14. Public ~enef~tso l~blic ImProvements and
Facilities.
14.1 Tntent. The parties acknowledge and agree
that development of the Proper~cy will result in substantial
public-needs which will not be fully met by development of the
Project and further acknowledge and agree that this Agreement
confers substantial private benefits on the Owner which should be
balanced by commensurate public benefits.. Accordingly, the
parties intend to provide consideration to the public to balance
the private. benefits conferred'on'the Owner by providing more
fully for the satisfaction of the public needs.resulting from the
Project.
14.2 Tmpmct Fees.
(a) The developer(s) of the Property shall pay a
capital or impact fee for road improvements and public facilities
the City may adopt for development ("Public Facilities Fee".), in
the amount in effect at the time of payment of the fee, (The
term "developer(s) of the Property or Projectw as used in this
Section shall-mean the person(s) who seeks a building permit to
construct structures'on the Property. These individuals shall
hereinafter be referred to as the "Developer-.) If an interim or
final public facility mitigation fee or benefit district has not
been finally'established by the date on which Developer requests
its building permits for the Project or any phase thereof, the
Developer shall execute an Agreement for Payment of a Public
Facility Fee, in substantially the form of Exhibit D.
· .. (b) Owner shall pay .all: other impact fees
provided for under the Land.Use RegulationS, including~ but'not
.'limited to the Residential Impact Fee (pursuant to Riverside
County Ordinance No. 659) and Flood Control, Fire, Library,
Traffic Mitigation and K-Rat Fees.
14.3 Fee Credits and Schedule. In exchange for
the dedication.of land, the construction of improvements and the
payment of fees, Owner shall be entitled to Fee Credits set ~orth
in Exhibit E.
14.4 Waiver. By execution of this Agreement,
Owner waives any right to object to the imposition of the
-15-
provisions of Section 15 of this Agreement, the adoption of any
interim or final Public Facility Fee, or the process, levy, or
collection of any interim or final Public Facility Fee for this
Project; provided that 'Owner is not waiving its right to protest
the reasonableness of any interim or final Public Facility Fee,
and the amount thereof.
15. 'Reservations of Authority.
15.1 T.~m~t~tions. Reserv~t.~ns. and' ~xceDtions.
Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, the
following Subsequent Land Use Requlations shall apply to the
development of the Property, including, but not limited to:
(a) Processing fees and charges imposed by
City to cover the estimated actual costs to City of
Processing'applications for Development Approvals or for
monitoring compliance with any Development Approvals granted
or issued.
.(b) Procedural regulations relating to
hearing bodies,.petitions, applications, notices, findings,
records, hearings, reports, recommendation, appeals, and any
other matter of procedure.
(c) Regulations governing construction
standards and specifications including, without limitation,
the City's Building Code., Plnm~ing Code, Mechanical Code,
Electrical Code, Grading Co~e and Fire Code.
(d) SUbsequant Land Use-.Regulations which
are'in conflict with the Development P~an.
15.2 Subsequent Development ADDrOVslS. This
Agreement shall not prevent City, in acting on Subsequent
Development Approvals from applying Subsequent Land Use
Regulations, even if they conflict with the Existing Land Use
Regulations, Existing Development Approvals or the Development
Plan. Further, this Agreement shall not prevent City from denying
or conditionally approving any Subsequent Development Approval on
the basis of the Existing or Subsequent Land Use Regulations.
-16-
14174.5 (7/27/92)
15.3 Mod~ficat{on or Suspension 'by State or
Federal T.aW. In the event that State or Federal laws or
regulations enacted after the Effective Date of this Agreement
prevent or preclude compliance with one or more of the Provisions
of this Agreement, such provisionS of this Agreement shall be
modified or suspended as maybe necessary to comply with. such
State or Federal laws or regulations, provided, however, that
this.Agreement shall remai. n in.full force and effect' to the
extent it is not inconsistent with such laws or regulations and
to the extent such laws or regulations do not render such
remaining provisions impractical to enforce.
15.4 Reaulat~on by Other Puh~.~c Agencies. It is
acknowledged by the parties that other public agencies not within
the control of City possess authority to regulate aspects of the
development of the Property separately from or jointly with City
and .this Agreement does not limit the authority of such other
public agencies.
15.5 VestSrio Tentative Ma~s. If any tentative or
final subdivision map, or tentative or'final parcel map,
heretofore or hereafter approved in connection with development'
of the Property, Is a vesting map. under the Subdivision Map Act
(Government Code Section 66410, etp_tq.) and Riverside COunty
Ordinance No. 460, as' the same was incorporated by reference into
the Temecula Municipal Code by Ordinance No. 90-04, and if this
Agreement is determined'by.a final'jUdgment to be invalid or
unenforceable insofar as. it grants a vested right to develop to
the Owner, then and to that extent 'the rights, obligations, and
protections afforded the Owner and City respectively, under the
laws and ordinances applicable to vesting maps shall supersede
the provisions of this Agreement. .Except as set forth
immediately above, development of the Property shall occur' only
as provided in this Agreement, and the provisions in this
Agreement shall be controlling over any conflicting provision of
law or ordinance concerning vesting maps.
16. Development of the ProDertV.
-17-
· - 16.1 Proiect. The Property shall be developed
with the following uses, and only the following uses:
(a) Senior Citizen Housing DevelOpment on
Parcel 2 of Parcel Map 27314, not to exceed 20 dwelling
units per net acre; ~
(b)
Parcel Map 27314;
Nine (9) hole golf course 'on Parcel 2 of
(c) Senior's Community Center on Parcel 1.of
the Parcel Map 27314; .
(d). Congregate Care Facility on Parcel 3 of
Parcel Map 27314; and
(e) Skilled Nursing and Personal Care
Facilities on Parcel 4 of Parcel Map 27314.
No change, modification, revision or alteration of
these uses or of the Projec~c may be made without the prior
amendment of this Agreement.
16.2 R4Qhts to Develop. The Permitted uses of the
Property, the density and'intensity of use, the maximum height
and size of proposed buildings, and Provisions for reservation
and dedication of land for public purposes Shall be those set
forth in Section 16.1 and the' Development Plan. The Project
shall remain subject to all. Subsequent Development Approvals
required to complete the Project as contemplated by the
Development Plan.
.. 16.3 Chanaes and Amendments. Notwith'standing.
Section 16.1, 'the parties acknowledge that refinement and further
development of the Project wili re~uire Subsequent Development
Approvals and may demonstrate that changes are appropriate and
mutually desirable in the Project. In the event the Owner finds
that a change in the Project is necessary or appropriate, the
owner shall apply for a Subsequent Development Approval to.
effectuate such change and City shall process and act on such
application in accordance with the Subsequent Land Use
Regulations. If approved, any such change in the Project shall
be incorporated herein as an addendum to this Agreement and may
'4.s~m~
14~74.~ (7/27/92)
be further changed from time to'time as Provided in this Section.
Unless otherwise required by law, as determined in City,s
reasonable discretion, a change to the Project shall be deemed
"minor" and not require an amendment to this Agreement provided
such change does not:
(a) Alter the permAtted uses of the Project
as a whole; or,
(b) 'Increase. the density or intensity Of use.
of the Project as a whole; or, ..
(c) Increase the maximum height and size of
permitted buildings; or,
(d) Delete a requirement for the reservation
or dedication of land for public purposes within the Project
as a whole;' or,
(e) Constitute a project requiring a
Subsequent or Supplemental Environmental Impact Repor~
pursuant to Section 21166 of the Public Resources Code.
17. Period.~c Review of ComD.~ance with Aureement.
(a) Pursuant to City Resolution No. 91-52, as it
may be subsequently amended, City shall review this Agreement at
least once during every twelve (12) month period from the date
this Agreement is executed. The Owner or successor shall
reimburse City for the actual and necessary costs of this review.
(b) During each periodic review by City, the
Owner is required to demonstrate good faith compliance with the
terms of the Agreement. The.Owner.agrees to furnish such
evidence of good faith compliance ~s City in the exercise of its
'discretion may require.
18. ~mendment or Cancellation of A~reement. This
Agreement may be amended or canceled An whole or in part only by
mutual consent of the parties and in the manner provided for in
Government Code Sections 65868, 65867 and 65867.5. If the
Amendment is requested by the Owner or successor, the
Owner/successor agrees to pay City any Development Agreement
Amendment fee then in.existence as established by City Council
-19-
Resolution, or if no such fee is established, to reimburse City
for the actual and necessary costs of reviewing and Processing
said Amendment.
19. Rre~ch of Aareement.
(a) The City reserves the right to terminate this
Agreement in the event of a mater~al breach of any of its
material terms or any material term of any applicable federal,
state or'local statute or regulation, Which breach is not cured·
following written notice and.a reasonabie opportunity toecure.
In finding such a breach:
(i) City does not waive any claim of defect
in performance by Owner implied if on periodic review the City
does not propose to modify or terminate the A~eement.
(ii) Non-performance shall 'not be excused
because of a failure of a third person; and
(iii) Non-performance shall be excused only
when it is prevented or delayed by acts of God or an emergency
declared by the Governor.
(b) The notice to cure period shall be thirty
(30) days (except in cases of emergency where a shorter time may
be Prescribed consistent with the nature of the emergency).
Where thirty (30) days is insufficient time for the Owner to cure
the notified .breach, Owner shall be deemed in compliance with the
provisions if, within that thirty-day time period Owner begins
good faith efforts to cure such breach and shall present a
specific and reasonable timetable to .the c'~ty~for the cure of the
notified breach. If the breach is-not cured within such time
period or within such additional time period specified in such
notice, the Planning Director shall cause to be noticed a public
hearing before the City Council.
(c) The Council shall hold a public hearing, upon
ten (10) days written notice duly given to Owner and published
notice provided to the public. Owner may appear at the public
hearing before the Council and present information, orally or in
documented form, that it deems relevant and appropriate to the
-2O-
Council,s deliberations. Based on the evidence presented at the
public hearing, the Council shall determine by resolution whether
the Agreement should be terminated. Nothing herein iS intended
to limit Council's right to make other determinations which are
reasonably related to the Agreement.
(d) The City Council shall cause OWner to receive
written notice'of any action taken.following the public hearing.
(e). Within not less than thirty (3'0). days of..
receiving notice of'the City Council#s action, Owner shall be
entitled to initiate an action in state court to seek judicial
review pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure Section
1094.5. In the event Owner initiates such a review, the
Council's determination shall be stayed pending a final order of
the court.
(f) Upon a finding of material breach of this
Agreement, and the failure of Owner to successfully challenge the
same in a court of law, City may not only terminate this
Agreement, but also shall amend the land use designation of the
Property to Institutional or Low-Medium Density Residential, and
amend the zoning to Single Family Residential (R-1); Owner
further agrees to such amendments.
(g) All other remedies at law or in equity which
are not otherwise provided for 'in the Agreement or in City's
regulations governing development agreements are available to the
parties. to pursue in .the event there.is a breach.
20. Damaaes UDOn Termination. 'I~.iS acknowledged
the parties that City would not have entered into this Agreement
if it were to be liable in damages under or with respect to this.
Agreement or the application thereof.
In general, each of the parties hereto may pursue
any remedy at law or equity available for the breach of any
provision of this Agreement, except that City, and its officers,
employees and agents, shall not be liable in damages to Owner or
to any assignee, transferee of Owner, or any other person, and
-21-
Owner covenants not to sue for or claim any damages for breach of
that Agreement by City.
21. Attorneys, Fees ~nd Costs. If legal ac~cion by
either party is brought because of breach of this Agreement or to
enforce a provision of this Agreement, the prevailing party is
entitled to reasonable attorneys fees and 'court costs.
22. 'Not~cen.. All .notices required or provided for
under this Agreement shall be in writing.and delivered in person
or sent by certified mail, postage prepaid. NoticereqUired to
be given to City shall be addressed as follows:
To City: City Clerk
City of Temecula
43172 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92390
Notices required to be given to Owner shall be addressed as
follows:
To Owner:
A party may change the address by giving notice in'writing to the
other party and thereafter notices shall'be addressed and
transmitted to the new address.
23. Rules of Construction and Miscellaneous Terms.
(a) The 'singular'includeS the plural; the
masculine gender includes'the feminine; "shall" is mandatory,
"may- is permissive.
(b) If a part of this Agreement is held to be
invalid, the remainder of the Agreement is not affected.
(c) If there is more than one signer of this
Agreement their obligations are joint and several.
(d) The time limits set forth in this Agreement
may be extended by mutual written consent of the parties in
accordance with the procedures for adoption of the Agreement.
~som~ -22-
(e) This Agreement is made and entered into for
the sole protection and benefit of the parties and their
successors and assigns. No other person, including but not
'limited'to third party beneficiaries, shall have any right of
action based upon any provision of this Agreement.
(f) This Agreement'maybe executed by the parties
in counterparts, each of which so fully executed counterpart
shall be'deemed an original irrespective .of the'date of;
execution.
24. Co-nterD-rts. This Agreement may be executed in
any number of .counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an
original, but all of which when taken together shall constitute
one and the same instrument.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF this Agreement has been executed by
the parties on the day and year first above written.
"CITY"
Attest:
By:
MAYOR
City Clerk
Approved as to form:
City Attorney
"OWNER"
· By:
Name:
Title:
14874.S am~g2)
-23-
By:
Name:
Title:
Notary
[ALL SIGNATURES SHALL BE ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE A NOTARY PUBLIC.
EXECUTION ON BEHALF OF ANY CORPORATION SHALL BE BY' TWO CORPORATE
OFFICERS. ]
-24-
DeB~tTI~TO]~ 01 ~
14~'/4.4
EXHIBIT "B"
WTTBT.TN~ DwV~.~pMw~TAppROV3T. R
Tentative Parcel Map No. 27314
change of zone No.'21
EXHIBIT .C~
D~'~ OPM~r Sc~r~mU~ ~
.I.
Within five'(5) years of the effective date of this Development A2,ccm~t, Owner shall have substantially begun
construction of each of the following uses:
A. Twenty (20) dwelling units of the Senior Citizen Housing Development, and
B. The Congregate Care Facility, Skilled' Nursing Facility, or Personal Cede Facility
'Substantially begun construction' shall mean obtai~-a building permit and having an lipproved and inspected
foundation. · ·
After twenty-five C25) percent of the dwelling units within the multi-family senior housing complex have received
Occupancy Permits and prior to the next Occupancy Permit issuance within this complex, owner shall have
constructed and obtained a Certificate of Occupancy for the Senior Citizen Center, and shall have completed the
golf coune.
Within five (:5) years of the effective date of this Development Agreement, Owner shall have recorded Parcel Map
No. 27314 and have obtained all subsequent development approvals for the Senior Citizen Housing Development,
the Congregate Care Facility, the Skilled NUrsing Facility, and the Personal Care Facility.
Within the term of this Development Agreement, Owner shall have obtained Certificates of Occupancy for all
buildings identified in the subsequent development approvals.
S~AFFIFPa7314TTM.]~
PURT,TC FACTT,TTY ~
Recording requested by, and
When ~ecorded mail to:
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
Attn: City Clerk
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
AGREEMENT FOR PAYMENT OF PUBLIC FACILITY FEE
This Agreement is made this 'day of
by and between the City of Temecula ("City") and
("Developer").
"Property" )
RECITALS
Developer is the owner of real property (the
in the City of Temecula described as follows:
Exhibit A, attached hereto-and incorporated herein by
reference
B'
.pursuant to
Developer. proposes.to develop the Property
(the "ProjeUt").
Recording of this Agreement is fee exempt pursuant to Government
Code Section 6103 as it is recorded for the benefit of the City of
Temecula, a public agency.,
-1-
C. City has determined ~hat the Project will impact
traffic and the demand for other public facilities within the
City as identified in the
the Project. These ~pacts must be' mitigated by payment of a fee
for additional road and public facility conStructiOn, which fee
shall be identified as set forth heroinafter.
D. The City proposes to impose a public facility fee
upon new developments within the City in order to construct
additional public facility improvements to Serve and benefit new
developments, including the Project. These fees shall be known
as.the "Teme~ula City-wide Public Facility Fee'Program- or
"Public Facility Fee."
E. Condition No. of the Project requires that
Developer execute this Agreement prior to issuance of a building
permit or conditional use permit, or recordation of the final
map, as provided specifically in the conditions of approval.
F. In order for Developer to proceed without full
payment of the 'Public Facility Fee in a'.timely manner, Cit~ and
Developer have determined to enter into this Agreement.
G. The term "public facility- shall refer to public
and municipal infrastructure, such as roads, highways, flood
control facilities, city ha!l, police stations, COmmtlnity
centers, theaters, parks and similar Public.infrastructur~.
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows:
1. Public Fac~l~tv Fee:
(a) The City Council will establish the amount of
the Public Facility Fee at soma tJ~a in the future. The Fee will
be based upon the square footage of each development, the vehicle
trips generated by each development, or similarmeasure(s). The
Public FacilityFee also shall establish'the specific improve-'
ments to be constructed and 'their cost, the benefit assessment'
area and the method by which the fair share, pro-rata obligations
of each property are to be established based on J~pact on traffic
and demand for public facilities.
(b) Developer shall pay the Public Facility Fee
cn each building at such t~me it receives its certificate of
occupancy or final 'inspection, which ever occurs first.
(c) The Council also may establish an Interim
Public Facility Fee to be followed by a Final Public Facility
Fee.'. If only the Interim Public Facility Fee has.been
established at the time the Developer seeks issuance of its
certificate of occupancy or'final inspection, whichever occurs
first, then Developer shall pay the Interim Fee prior to issuance
of the.certifiCate of occupancy or 'final inspection, whichever
occurs first. Later, when the Final Public Facility Fee is
established, the Developer will be rej~bursed for any difference
between the Interim and Final Fee 'if the Interim Fee exceeds the
Final Fee, and shall pay the shortfall if the Final Fee exceeds
the Interim Fee.
(d) If the certificate of occupancy or final
inspection occurs prior to the establishment of the Interim or
Final Public Facility Fee, then the Developer shall pay a deposit
of Two Dollars ~$2.00) per square foot, not to exceed Ten
ThoUsand Dollars ($10,000) prior to the issuance of the
certificate of occupancy or '~inal ~nspec~ion~ The deposit shall
be a credit against the Interim or Final Public Facility Fee. A
letter of credit or cer~ificate of deposit may be provided in
lieu of the deposit.
(e) If either the Final or Interim Public
Facility Fee is established after the issuance of the certificate
of occupancy or final inspection, the Developer shall pay the
Interim or Final Public Facility Fee ten (.10) days after
receiving notice from the City that it has been established.
(f) Notwithstanding the above, Developer shall
provide City with written notification of the opening of' any
escrow for the sale of the Project and shall provide in the
escrow instructions tha~ if the InterAm or Final Public Facility
Fee has been'eStablished, the Fee shall be paid to the City from
the sale proceeds in escrow prior to distributing the proceeds to
Developer/seller.
(g) City shall record a release of'this Agreement
upon payment of all Public Facility Fees owing and shall provide
Developer with a copy of such release.
- 2. Use of Public F-c434tv Fee:
The Public FacilityFee collected pursuant to this
Agreement shall be used only to Construct C~ty-wide traffic and
public facility improvements, which improvements are deemed to be
of benefit to Project, and for expenses incidental thereto.' '.
There is a reasonable relationship betwean the Project and the
Public Facility Fee in that the Pro~ect will impact traffic and
existing public facilities, and conse~uantly, will require
expansion of the City-wide street and highway system, and public
facilities in order to meet the added demand resulting from the
Project. The amount of the Public Facility Fee to be collected
from Project represents the cost of facil~ties necessary to meet
the incremental increase in traffic and demand for public
facilities resulting from the Project.
3- Tnformat~on Provided:
Developer shall provide to City, upon Cityms request
therefor, any and all information regarding access to the
Project, ~raffic..flow~ trip generation factors and such other
information as is reasonably necessary'to establish the Public
Facility Fee.
4. Security for ~c Fac~tv Fee:
(a) If the Interim or Final Public Facility Fee
has been established prior to issuance of a building permit or
other entitlement described in Recital E, then, concurrent with
~he execution of ~his Agreement, Dsveloper shall provide an
irrevocable letter of credit or o~her form of security approved
by City, in a form approvsd by ~he City Attorney, in an amount
equal to the total Public Facility Fee for the Project. The
amount of security' may be increased upon' Ctty'l' request should
there be an lncrease in the amount of the' Public Facility Fee.
The amount of securlty also may be reduced upon Developer's
payment of Public Facility Fees outstanding. However, except for
the deposlt provided for in Section 1, no letter of credit is
required if neither the Interim or Final Public Facility Fee has
not been established as of the date of execution of this
Agreement.
(b) As an alternative to collecting the fee from
the letter of credit, if the Developer fails to pay the Public
Facility Fee within thirty (30).days of the date demand is made,
the City may assess a penalty of ten percent (10%) of the amount
owing and make said Fee, inclusive of penalty, a lien upon the
'described real propeTty by' recording a nOtiCe that said Fee is
due Under the terms of. this Agreement with the County Recorder of
Riverside County. The notice shall state the fac~ that said Fee,
inclusive of penalty, is due under the terms of this Agreement
and shall state the amount, together with the fac~ that it is
unpaid and draws interest on the Fee and penalty at the rate set
forth at California Revenue & Taxation SectiOn 19269 until paid.
. (c) The City may as an alternative to the lien
'procedure set forth above, bring legal action to collect the
Public Facility Fee due. The Developer agrees that if legal
action by ~he City is necessary to collect the Fee the Developer
agrees tO pay. the City a reasonable sum as attorney.'s fees 'and
court costs, together with penalty and Anterest determined
according to Paragraph 4 (b) of this Agreement.
5. A~eement Runs W4th T~nd:
This Agreement pertains to and runs with the
Property. This Agreement binds the successors in interest of
each of the parties.
6. Wa{ver:
By execution of this Agreement, Developer waives
any right to protest the provisions of Condition No. of
the Project, this Agreement, the formation of any Public Facility
fee district, but not the nexus. between any Public Facility fee
and the Project.
7. B{nd~n~. Aareement:
This Agreement shall be binding upon Developer,
Developer,s successors and assigns.
8. ~mendment/No Cont~nuina Waiver:
This Agreement may be modified or amended only in
writing, signed by both parties. This Agreement contains ~he
full and complete understanding of the parties and supersedes any
and all prior oral or written agreements or representations. A
waiver of any term or condition of this Agreement by eithar par~y
shall not be deemed a continuing waiver thereof.
9. Attorneys' Fees:
Should either'party determine'that it is necessary
to file a legal action to enforce or interpret'the provisions of
this Agreement, the prevailing party in that litigation shall be
entitled to its reasonable costs, including but not limited to
attorneys' fees.
10. Notqce:
Notice shall be deemed given under this Agreement
when in writing and deposited in the United States mail, first-
class, postage prepaid, addressed as follows:
CITY: DEVELOPER:
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
Attn: City Clerk
11.
invalid,
Agreement as Developer, their
M~ Sce.ll aneous Prov{ s{ one
(a) If any provisO'on of this'Ageement is adjudged
the remaining provisions shall not be affected.
(b) If there is more than one (1) signer of this
obligations are joint and several.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, ~he parties or-~heir duly authorized
representatives have executed this Agreement as of the date set
out above.
CITY'OF TEMECULA
DEVELOPER
By:
David S. Dixon.
City Nanagar
By:
APPROVED AS TO FORH:
By:
SCott F. Field
City Attorney
Form df Condition:
Developer shall pay a building permit or any capital fee for
road improvements and public facilities ~mposed upon the proper~y
or project, including that for traffic and public facility
mitigation as'required under the EIR/Ne~ative Declaration for the
project, in the amount in effect at the time of payment of the
fee. If an interim or final public facility mitigation fee or
district has not been finally established by the date on which
.Developer requests its building permits for the 'project or any
phase thereof, the Developer shall pay a deposit of $2.00 per
square foot, not to exceed $10,000, and execute the Agreement for
Payment of Public .Facility Fee, a copy of which has been provided
to Developer. Developer understands that 'said Agreement may
require the payment of fees in excess of those now estimated
(asSuming benefit to the project in the amount of such fees) and
specifically Waives its right to protest such increase.
In imposing this condition, the City finds as follows:
1. The fee collected will be used for City-wide'road and
public facility improvements.
2. The road and public facility improvements (or portions
thereof) to be financed will serve the project by providing
access, reducing congestion, and providing adequate public
facilities, such as, but not limited to, City Hall, police
station, fire station, community center and parks.
-i-
~- There is a need for such road and public facility
improvements for the project as the project will generate traffic
onto the roads to be improved and demand for additional public
facilities.
4. 'There is a reasonable relationship between the amount
of the fee and the cost of the road and public facility
improvements in that the amount of the fee is no more than the
amount'of benefit to be received by each unit from access to and
use of ~he road and public facility improvements.
LETTER OF CREDIT
i(To be on Letterhead of Issuing Financial Institution)
CITY OF TEMECULA
43172 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92390
Re:
Instrument of Credit Delivered'as Performance
Security.for Public Facilities Fee.
Gentlemen:
[name of financial institution] , a
financial institution· subject to regulation by the State of
California or the Federal Government of the United States of
America, delivers to the City of Temecula this instrument of
credit as security for performance of the Agreement For
Payment Of Public Facilities Fee, dated by and
between the City of Temecula and
· and
referred to herein and by this reference made a pert hereof·
subject to the following conditions:
I. We pledge that we hold and will hold. on
deposit the sum of Ten Thousand dollars ($10,000.00) as
trust funds guaranteed for payment to City of Temecula to
secure faithful performance by
· (hereinafter referred to as "Principal") of the
Agreement for payment of Public Facility Fee.
Upon demand by the'City Manager of the City of
Temecula, the whole or any portion of said funds shall be
paid forthwith to the City should the Principal fail to
perform any of its obligations'to the City under the
Agreement For'Payment Of Public Facility, Fee.
II. No amendment to the Agreement For Payment Of
Public Facility Fee, agreed to by City of Temecula and
Principal, shall relieve us from liability on this letter of
credit. We hereby give consent for any such amendments to
be made without further notice to or consent by us. We
hereby hold ourselves bound without regard to and
independently of any action against Principal whenever
taken. We further agree that if City of Temecula sues on
this letter of credit, we will pay, in addition to the face
value of this letter, all its reasonable costs· expenses and
attorneys fees incurred by it in successful. ly enforcing such
obligation, to be awarded and fixed by the court· and to be
-1-
sff/LTR110111
taxed as costs and to be included in the judgment
rendered.
This instrument of credit is irrevocable.
.Financial Institution Principal
therein
(Name).
(Title)
I swear under penalty of
perjury that I have authority
to bind the above-named
financial institution to the
terms of this letter of
credit.
Executed at
California, on
· 19 .
By ~
By:
(Name)
(Title)
(Name)
(Title)
Signature
Approved as to Form:
'By~
Scott F. Field
City Attorney
CITY OF TEMECULA
-2-
sff/LTRll0111
Upon obtaining a certificate of occupancy.Owner shall
dedicate'to the City the Senior Citizen Center
described in Exhibit. C.' In ~xchange for dedication of
the Senior Citizen Center end completion of the Golf
Course, Owner shall receive a full credit against its
Quimby Fees required pursuant to Riverside County
Ordinance No. 460.
~.5&~)
DRRr~ RRSTRTCTTON
RECORDING REQUESTED BY:
WHEN RECORDEDMAIL TO:
CITY CLERK
CITY OF .TEMECULA'
43174 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA 92590
DRCT.ma~tTTON OF 9wBTRTCTZONB
This DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIONS made this
· 1992, by (.
hereinafter referred to as "Declarant.-
I! )
day of
WHEREAS, Declarant is the owner of Parcels 1-4 of Parcel Map
No. 27314 (the "Property-); and
WHEREAS, Declarant intends to sell the above described
pro.perry, restricting it in accordance 'with a common lan
'.NOW, THEREFORE, Declarant declares that said real property
shall be held, transferred, encumbered, used· sold, conveyed,
leased, and occupied, subject to the covenants and restrictions
hereinafter set forth expressly and exclusively for the use and
benefit of said property and. of each and every person or entity
~ast fifty five 55 ea Property unless he or she is at
' ( ) y rs of age, or otherwise qualifies for
residency pursuant to California Civil Code Section 51.3.
under them for a period of thirty (30) years from the date these
covenants are recorded, after which time said covenants shall be
automatically extended for successive periods of ten (10) years
unless an instrument signed by a majority of the then owners of
the lots, and the City of Temecula~ has been recorded, agreeing
to change said covenants in whole or in part.
14874.,~ (7/Z7,,e)2)
3. ~-nforcement. Enforcement shall be by proceedin s
P g ~olate any covenant either to restrain violation
or to recover damages. The City of Temecula may enforce any
.covenaht of this Declaration.
4. 'Attorneys Fees. Should any par~y bring an action
against the other for the purpose of enforcing the terms of this
Stipulation, or for damages arising from its breach, then in such
event, the prevailing party shall be entitled to its reasonable
attorneys fees and costs in addition to any other aWard'entered
by the Court. -
5. SeverAh.414tv. Invalidation of any one of these
covenants by Judgment or court order shall in no wise affect any
of the other provisions which shall remain in full force and
effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Declatent has executed this Declaration
of restrictions the day and year first above written.
DECLARANT:
Signature
Name:
Address:
'4~ Omen)
ATTA~ NO. 7
SECTIONS ~.1 AND ~,2 OF ORDINANCE NO. 348
RURAL I~'-qlDENTIAL ZONING STANDARDS
S~"'F,~"FRFF~2'7314TTM.p~ vrw
ARTICLE V
R-R ZONE (RURAL-RESIDENT/AL)
SECTION S.l. USES.PERNITTED IN R-R ZONE.
Residential and Ltght rtcultural Uses,
(1) Any use permittedATe A-1 Zone, subject to the conditions set
forth thoreta, unless heroinafter modified.
(2) nobtlehme, used as a one-fmll~ residence, subject to the
fol 1 ow4 eg conall tt one:
a, nobt)ehmes shall .have a floor area'.of not'l.ess that 450
square feet,
b. The ares between. the Found level and the floor of a
mob11 ehome she11 be screened frgn dew by an opaque s k~ rt
enttrely around the. mobilehome.
The follo~ng uses shall be pemttted ;H. ov~ded approval of a plot plan
shell first have been obtatned pursuant to the provisions of Sectton
18.30:
(1) F~shtng lakes, camnettle1 and eoncmnerCtal.
321 Guest ranches and motels.
Educational *~nst4tut~ons, libraries, museums and post office.
(4) Golf, tennis, polo or country clubs, archery and golf and dr~vtn9
ranges.
(5) Commercial uses for the convenience of and 1*net dental to any of
(6)
'8)
the above permitted uses ~hen located upon the same lot or parcel
of land.
Feed and gratn sales.
ilurser~es and garden supply stores.
Pet shops and pet supply shops.
Real estate offices.
(d)
~10) Stgns, on-stte advertising.
(11) Arts, crafts and curio shops.
Public Uttllty Uses.
(1) Structures end Installations necessary to the conservation and
clove1 opment of .water .such. as .dins, pt peltnes, water condutts,
tanks, canals., reservoirs, walls and the. necessar~ pumptrig. and
· water production factltUes.
(2) Structures and the pertinent fac~il'tttes 'necessary and tactdental
to the development and Iraremission of electrical power and gas
such is ~droelectr~c power plants, booster or conversion plants,
transmission 1tees, pipelines and the 11ke.
'3) Redto broadcasting stations.
,541 Telephone transmission l?nes, telephone exchan es and offtces.
Railroads, Including the necessa~ facilities ~n connection
therout th.
(6) Telev4ston broadcasting startank, antennas, and cable
Installations, and microwave relay stations.
The fol lovln9 uses are larmttted protided a conc~ttonal
has been granted:
( 1 ) At rpo rt or 1 anc~ ng f1 el d. .
19
use permtt
Auto arecking Jards.
Any mtnt.g operation ~htch Is exmpt fr2 t~ pro~stons of the
California ~ffKe M~nf~ ~d Reclinelion Act of' 1975 and
Rtve~t~ ~n~ kdtna~e No. 555.
CBe~, ~t or Man.
a. bttWe ibis,
b. ~tmohfie se~ce staten and ~aJr garages ~th or
'~t~ut t~ concursor ,lo of Wr nd ~N ~r off-praises
coupU on. -. '.
c. Baker~ s~ps, ~ncl'u~ hking only ~n Jnc~nta~ %o'
sale on :he ~Jses.
d. Ba~r s~ps ~d H~ s~pa.
e. Ba~ and ~c~atl l~n~s.
~- B~lllard and ~ol halls.
g. Cleanl~ and d~Jng sh~s.
ntal ser~ces, JKludJng ~tJlle~,
mows., san,~, ~r sa~, cment and pluter mJxe~ not
exc~dJng 20 cubJc ~eet In capacid, and other slmSlar
e~ent.
k. Food, meat, Nultr~ and ~oduce
markets.
. F~zen ~od locke~.
m. Hardva~ s~s.
n. L~ndrles and laundrmats.
o. LJ~Jd ~trole~ ser~ce stations, ~th or ~t~ut the-'
concurrent sale of Her and ~ne ~r off-p~Jses
cons~p~lon.pro~d the% Jr s~ra~ tan~ a, abo,
t~ total capacl~ of all ~nks s~11 ~t exceed 10,000
gallons. Stora~ tanks. shall H ~Jnted a Nutral color and
sha~l no% have an~ ad~rtJsJng paJnted or placed on %~Jr
~ace.
(4)
p. Ltquor stores.
q. (t)eleted)" .'- ..
r. Parking lo13 and parking buildings, pursuant tO the
rovtsfons. of hctton (matmobile storage space).
s. ~PDel eted) 18.12
t. Professional offtces.
.. (I)eleted)
v. Refreslnent stands.
w. Restaurants and other eattrig establlsMents.
x. Shoe stores and repatr shops.
y. (Oeleted)
z. Stirtons, bus, rilltold and tlxl.
aa. TIre slles and servSce.-
bb. Tourtst toforaatJon centers.
cc. Underground bulk fuel storage.
dd. Auctton houses and yards.'
Dune .buggy parks.
Frutt and vegetable packing plants
and stmtlar uses.
20
Hog ranches, subject to the provisions of Ordinance No. 43Z.
Hunttrig clubs~
(32) Lm~her production of a cronerein1 nat~re, Including cmmerctal
loggtng or c~merctal development of Ulher end lunber mfils.
(23) I1acMne shops.
:(:14) The aanufacture of:
a. Brick, ttle or terra-cotta.
b. Caneat and caReat products.
co Gypsum.
16 Rigrant agricultural uorkers Bobflelme larks.
.17. Pen-fed cattle olarattons, livestock saleyards, livestock a~ctton
yards, end dstrJr fires.. " ' ·
(~8) BRace tracks, Including but not 1tat'ted 1;O. contests between
sotmobiles, horses, go-carts, and motorcycles, but not Including
contests Ixtteen Man betfigs enly.
(19) IteCreattonal vehicle larks.
(20) Rifle, ptstol, skeet, or trapshooting
ranges.
(21) BRodeo arenas.
ItTra11 btke parks.
Tratler and 'beat storage.
(24) (Deleted)
Neat culttrig tad lacklFing plants, provided there is no
slaughtering of antmils or rendering of
Hater well drilltrig, operations and service
(29) (Deleted)
(30) Hobtlehme parks, develolad pursuant to Sectton 19.93 of thts
ordinance.
The folioring uses are larmttted provided that the operator thereof
holds a pemtt to conduct surface mtntng operations Issued pursuant to
RIverside County' Ordinance No. 555 whtch has not been revoked or
suspended.
C1) Any mtntn9 operation that ts sub:leer to the California Surface
Hintrig .lad Itec!a~ltton Act of 1975.
Kennels and cutterIns are tarrattled provtded they are approved
pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.45 of this ordinance.
Any use that ts not specifically 11sled In subsections b. and d. may
be constdsred a tarmilled or conditionally Fennltted use provided that
the Pllnntng Nrector finds that the proposed use ts substantially the
Same In character and tritenatty.as those 11sled tn the designated
subsections. Such a use ts subject to the pemtt Irocess which
governs the category tn which tt fa~ls.
knended Effecttve:
11-11-82 (Ord. 348.2204)
12-23-82 (Ord. 348.2140)
.21
/
08-02-84
04-04-87
06*30.88
05.04-89
07;20.89
(Ord. 348.2338)
'Oral. 348.2669)
Ord. 348.2856'
Ord. 348.3023
,Oral. 348~3043',
SECTION 5.2. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, IdlErs I structure ts erected or a
use ts Bade $n the R-R Zone that ts first specifically permitted tn another
zone classification, such structure or use shell meet the develolamnt standsrd~
and rulattons of the zone fn uhfch such structure or use ts first
specifics117 permitted, unless such requtrmnents are hereafter motrifted.
a. One 'fmt1~ residences shall not 'exceed 40 feet tn-heTght. No other
butldtng or structure shall exceed 50 feet tn hetght, unless s hetght
up to 75 feet for imtld~ngs, 105 feet for other structures, or greater
than 105 feet for broadcasting antennas ts approved pursuant to
hctton 18.34 of this ordnance.
b. 'Lot Ares. One-half acre, with e mlnt.mum average width of 80 feet,
lnclueing the ares to the center of adjacent streets, shall be the
etaimam stze of any lot except as follo~s:
(1) Publlc Utilities, 20,000 squire feet with I mtnfm~ enrage lot
~dth and ~_~p~b_of--~OO-feet,
c, Automobile storage space sha]l be provided as required by SecUon
28.~ 'of thts ordinance,
knended effectt yea
09-04-62 07-26-69
09-15-65 3~.39Z ~-2~70
01-Z9-66 (~d. 348.422: 09-30-70
0~02-67 :348.5Z8:
'Ord. 348.638)
,Oral.
(Ord. 348.783 )
(Ord. 348.905)
Fomerly Arttote
Z Z!-ranumbered
Art. V'and mended:
05-04-72
08-09-73
05-30.74
06-20.74
11-07-74
· 03-20.75
07-10.75
(Ord. 348.1023)
'Ord. 348.1189:
'Ord. 348.1327
'Ord. 348.1340:
Oral. 348.1377
Oral. 348.1429'
-:0 d. a48.14se:
r
10.02-7S
12-10.75
02-03-77
04-21-77
09*08*77
04-1-2-79
'11-29-7g
07-02-81
11-11-82
12-23-82
05-19-83
08-02-84
10.06.89
22
:Oral. 348.1470'
'Ord. 348.1481.
. Ord. 348.1545
. :Ord. 348.1S64:
'Oral. 348.1588'
. Ord.
.Oper. 01.01-80)
Ord. 348.1968'
,0rd..'348.2104'
0rd.'348.2140'
:Ord. 348.2162
.Ord. 348.2338'
~Orj:l. 348.3053)
ATTACHI~':NT NO. 8
SECTIONS 8.1 AND 8.2 OF ORDINANCE NO. 348
GENERAL RESIDENTIAL ZON/NG STANDARDS
ARTICLE VIII
t-3 :ZONE (SENERA:. ItESIDENTIAL)
The foil·ring regulstJons shall apply tn s11 R-3 Zones:
SEerlOll e.1. USES' PERMITTED.
· . The foil·vial uses shell .be perattted protided approval of · .lot plan
Shall first hie been ·bratned pursuant to the provisions of ~ectlon
18.30:
(1; Any use peat tied t-n the R-2 Zone.
32 Apartment Muses.
', Nonprofit clubs and lodge halls.
r4' Frsternt-T~ led sorortV Muses.
. S Hotels, mort Mtels, aed motelS.
6: Nora·r7 ScMols for prescMol day care.
,7, lesttroll·us for the aged licensed by the 'California State
De srlment of Soctsl tieliar· or the County Deps truant of Public
Veil fare. r
':! RedSca1 end dental off$'ces.
Cht ropractic offices.
..10) Llv Offices.
(11) Architecture1, engineering, end cmmontty planning offices;
r
protided there ts no outde· storage of materials, equipment, or
vehicles, other than passenger cars.
n
Co gregate care. residential fatalities.
Accessor~ buildings, to · spectfic permitted use, provtded that the
accessory bulldtng ts established Is In tactdent to lprlnctpil use and
does .not change the character of that use. -
Ce
On-alia slgns, offtxed to butldlng ells, stating the none of the
structure, use, or Institution, not to exceed S percent of the surface'
ares of the exterior face of.the vsll upon uhlch the Stgnts located.
The folioring uses shall be peat tied protided a conditional use pemtt
ts oh.lathed pursuant to this ordinance:
(1) nobt)ehome parks, developed 'pursuant to kctton ig,g2 o~. this
oro~ nanco. ..
'2~ (De1 ·ted) "
.3 Parking Ires for conmarcia1 uses.
'~47 Everite uurse~ ache·l, chtld care end baby-sttt4ng facilities
vhere ~3 or more unrelated children are kept under supervision'by
· person ltcensed by the State De srlment of Soctal trial/are or
Riverside County Department of PuE11c gall·re (bring an~ hours
between S p.m. and 8 i'e'-
(S) Congregate care residential fsct11Ues, developed pursuant to
Section 19.103 of this ordinance.
ee
Planned residential d~velopments, provided · land dtvtston ts ·pproved'
purSuant to the provisions of Ordinance No. 460 and the develo~ent
standards te hctloe :~8.5 or :~8.6 of thts ordinance.
f, Kennels ·rid celt·ties Ire pemtttad provided they ·re approved pursuant
to the 'l~ovistons of Sectton 18.45 of this ordinance.
Mended Effect1 ve:
Z2-23-82 'Ord, 348,~)40'
06-28-84 Ord, 348,~34:Z'
04;04-87. '0 d, 348,2669'
r
01-25-.87 ,Oral, 348,2543:.
SECTION 8:2. DEVELOPI~NT 5TMDARD$, The telloving standards of
develol2nent shall apply tn the l-3 Zone, except that planned residential
develol~nents shell comply kdth the develol~ent standards contained tn Sectlee
Z8. S of thts oral1 niece.
ae
The ate¶mum lot area shall .he 7200 square feet vlth a etalaura average
vidth of 60 feet and I mtnlm~ average depth of :~00 feet, unless
different mtntmums ire. specifically roqutred tna particular area.
The atntm~ front and rear yards sh~11 be :~0 feet for Iwtldtngs that do
no exceed 35 feet tn he1 hi. A~y rtton of I butldtn9 kd~tch exceeds
35 feet tn hetght Shall C set becC°fran the front and roar lot 1tees
no less than lO feet plus Z feet for each foot by ahtch the betght
exceeds 35 feet. The front litbeck Shill be measured frm any extstl~-
or future street line Is sho~m on any spectftc street plan of the
County. The rear setback shall be measured fr~n the extsttng rear lot
1tee or Iron any recorded alley or Is·meet; tf the rear 1tee adjotnsa
street, the rear setback requlrment shall be the-sane as requt red for
a front setback.
c. The mtntmum ·1de yard shell be 5 feet for bJtldlngs that do no exceed
35 feet tn height. Af~ purl¶on of · Iwtldtn vhtch exceeds 35 feet tn
height shall be set lack frm each side lot ~tne 5 feet I)lus 2 feet for
each foot"b.v vhtch the hetght exceeds 35 feet; 1f the side yard adjoins
a street, the stde setback requlrment Shill be the ·me Is requtred
for I front letbeck. IIo structural encrelc~ents shall be
8
thts ordt niece.
lie lot S~411 hie mere then 50 percent of 1Is net ·tea covered vtth
ktldings or Structures.
The mextaum rat1· of floor ·Tea to lot area shall not be Fester than
tee to one, not tncluc~ng busmeet floor area.
All itldtngs and structures shall not exceed SO feet tn height, unless
ahetght up to 75 feet ts specifically peat tied under the provisions
of hotlee X8.34 of thts ordinance.
g. De1 eted.
h. AutauobTle storage 'space shall be protided as requtred.ky SectSon 18.12
of thts ord1 nancl.
- Mended 'Effecttve:
01-15.64 'Ord. 348.251:
01-19-66
06*07-67
09-23-70
09-16-71
· 05-04,-72
06-21-73
09-13-73
05-30*?4
12-10-75
04,-12-79
03-16-82
12-23-82
08-29-85
'Ord. 348,422'
Ord. 348.507
,Ord. 348.777
'Ord. 348.920,
Ord.
Oral. 348.1201'
Ord. 348.1327.
Oral. 348.1481
Ord. 348.1688:,
:Ord. 348.2510)
43·
ATTA~ NO. 9
SECTIONS 18.5 AND 18.6 OF ORDINANCE NO. 348
STANDARDS FOR HANNING RESIDENTIAL DEVELO PMEN'I~ &
PLANNING RF~IDENTIAL DEVI~ O~ - SENIOR cll'~S
56
SEETIC)N 28.4. SPECIAL STUDIES Zl)NES - GEOLOGIC REPORT REQIJIREIkENT.~.
a~ In addttton to the requirefleets of this ordinance, 811 applicant, s, fo~
a spectftc plan of land use, conditional use ~mlt, Wbl~c use permtt,
plot plan or daveloment J~an or certificate of occu anc approval, for
a project, as aloftned tn verstda Count/Ordinance C. ~7.. w~thtn a
s#ectal studies z~ne dallneated by the State bologtst rsuant to
kctton 26Z1 et seq. of the hbllc Resources Coda, shal~ucmply ~lth
,11 of the provisions of RIverside County Ordinance No. 541, and no
Rmtt or ,ppmval subject thereto shall be ranted t
except n
accord, rice itth the Invtslom thereof.
· be
No application subject to the provtsfom of this sectton shall be
constdared as cm leted for filthy, and the ttme' 11mtliattons for
processing an application shall not be~4n to ~un, unttl all
requt rments undar Ordinance leO. S47 have been campie.ted.
SECTION 18.S. $TAI~RD$ FOR PLMNED RESIDENTIN. DEYELOPI~NTS. Planned
residential clavelopments shall be constructed tn accordance ~lth the
heretnafter 11sted requirements. In adriftton thereto, planned reslenttal
davelopments shall be subject to, and shall canply ulth, such adctlttonal
conditions and requtrments as a~e datermined to be necessl~ tn approvtng the
development to make tt cmNttble ~th the camuntty tn ~hlch ttts proposed to
be located.
(3)
A subdivision map, Prepared substantially tn ~ccordance with the
conelttons of ~oval ~of and ~ ~qut~en~ of thts
sectton, shall ~ ~coPMd W~uant ~ ordnance NO. 460.
DENSITY, OPEN AREAS AI~ HEIGHT LIMITATIONS. Not less than 40~ of
the net area of a project shall be used for open area or
recreatlonal facilities, or a cg~btnatt0n thereof. The net area
of. a project shall be 'datermined by excluding all streets, dr4ves
and automobile storage areas, The total ember of d~elltn9 units
tn a project shall not exceed that. uhtch ~ould be peat trod tf
the project ere s standard lot davelopment. The hetght of
bullSings shall not exceed that vhtch ts peattrod tn the zone tn
ahtch the project ts located. The maxtam pealtrod danstt, y and
hatght 11mtts my be reduced.If ttts datemined to be necessary
for'a planned development to achieve compatlbtltty-Vtth the area
tn ~htch the davelolaent ts located,'
YARD SITBACKS, Butlding setbacks fro a ProJect's exterior
streets and boundary 1tees shall be the sane as those prescribed
by the zone tn ,htch the project ts located. In no case shall
such butlding setbacks for any project be less than those
prescribed tn the R-3 Zone. The.mtntmm butlding setlack fro
tntertor drtves abel1 be ten feet.
(4) STREETS, Streets, ~htCh may be pemttted to be private, shall be
requt red tn accordance utth the prorlstons of Ordinance No.' 460.
149
(s)
RESIDENT];& ST~JCTURES. The nanher of delltrig u~tts tn one
butlding shell not exceed INo tn the R-2 Zone and all other zones
that pemtt planned residential clevelolaents as me R-I use, or
etght d~elltng uMts tn one lallding tn the R-2 end R-Z-A Zones.
The nanher of dwell trig untts tne bUtlding tn the R-3 Zone and
ell other zones that pemtt planned residential develoFments as
an l-3 use shill not exceed that perufiled bJf the l-3 Zone
development senate. liestdentta] buJldlngs shall have a
Etateen' ground floor 11vtng area of ~000 square fat and each ..
'dNelllng untt tni butldi shell have the M.ntman floor 11vtng
area requtred by betton Zn~.:l:~ of thtS ordinance.
(6)
RECREAT];ONAL BU];LDZIIGS. Recreational, 'publlc assembly and
strutlet lull dingo may be perutiled Mthtn a project tf they are
tntended for the prtmary use of persons rusldtng vlthtn the
project and are located so us not to be detrimental to adjacent
propert1 es.
(7) IqAZNTENANCE OF CONteN AREAS. A cmnuntty ussoctatton ~lth the
unqualified fight to'assess the ovners of the dvelllng untts for
ell maintenance, operational and other costs of the cmnon areas
facilities and the corntaunt association .shall
and conttnuousl3 maintained. :iTAe ussoctatton shallbe established
and have the
rtght to 1 ten the get ts of the owners who default t n the' pe.v~ent
of thetr assessments. The assoctatton's 1ten shall not be
subordinate to any encmbrance other than a deed of trust or
mortgage made tn good fatth and for value "htch is of record
prtor to the recorderton of the lien of the ussoctatton. Prtor.
to recordatton of the ftnal subdivision mlp, the developer shall
submtt for approval the declaratlon of covenants, conditions and
.restrictions for the project. The approved declaration shall be
recorded at the ttme of the recording of the ftnal subdivision
map ..
(8). TRASH AREAS. Adequate enclosed trash ptckup areas, convenient to
the residents "h1'ch they are tnten-ded to serve, shall be provided
t n the project.
SCREENZNG. A stx-foot htgh masonry wall shell be constructed on
any project bUundery 1tee .here the adjacent property ts zoned
for a lover residential denstrY then tat zone tn .htch the
project ts located.
HALl:HAYS. FIve-foot vide paved pedestrian kelkeys shall be
Installed between the d~e111ng untts and the recreational areas
of the project.
(11) ACCESS. Vehicular access opentags tntoa project shall be
1trotted to one for each 400 feet of INbllc street frontage;
however, al 1 projects she11 be pare1 tied be access ch-t yes
regardless of the smount of frontage.
(12) PARtiNG.
An,mobile storage space requtred shall be as
determined at the the of tssuance of the conditional use penn1,;
hoeere tn no event shall there be less than 1.5 plrldng spaces
for each one bedram ant t and not less than 2.5 spaces for each
untt vtthtn be or ere bedrooms. The requtred parktrig spaces
shall'he pro.ideal entirely vtth the develolaent. Public street
purldug led tundra paricing shill not be counted tn this
requt ranant,
SECTION. 2.6.- PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVEL~NTS - SENION CITIZENS.
(1-)' linen 'tt ls proposed by in p!tcant that eccupancy of a planned
residential development belTtatted to sent. or citizens', the
application for the land divtston shall tnclude the starmen,
that the dayclaimant ts sad be 1tatted Senior
Cltizen Residential Deve~rt~tapmelo~eapment. to to a
(2)
Senior CItizen Planned Residential Develolsents shall be
constructed in accordance vtth a11 of the development
requtrments.of Section 18.5, except as madtried herein:
DESIGN. The overall development shall be designed for ease of
use by persons of edvanced age.' Not less than one accessible
route for the handicapped to all on-site facilities shall be
protided. Idhere public fadlilies extst, such as bus stops,
sidewalks and drop-off zones, accessible routes for the
handicapped shall be provtded~
b. LOCATION. Developments shall he located tn areas vhlch offer
servtces to the aged, such is transportation, shopping,
recreation and nutr4tton proFens. .
c. ELEVATORS. No buildtrig shall be constructed that exceeds one
· stor~ in height unless it contains elevators for the use of
the occupants. Residential buildings uhtch exceed one story
shall provide add4ttonal elevators tf they Ire needed due to
the. amber of untts or project design.proposed. Elevators
shall he spiced tn order to stntstze the yolk trig 'distance
frs the elevators to the residential untts.
d. RECREATION. Camart recreational facilities or bullet rigs
designed for senior clttzen use shall he praytried for the use
of the occupants.
HEDICAL. Ikdtcal offtces and convalescent facilities, not
Including hospitals, say be required for the use of the
occupants.
f. PARKING. The rimhat of requtred an,mobile storage spaces
shall be datemined tn accordance vith Sac,ton 18.12 of this
ordinance at the time of the approval of the project;
151
however, n~t~dthstending any prorlston tn thts ordinance to
the centrat/, I t~enty percent reduction tn the total n~ber
of rkiutred vehicle perking spaces for residential Purposes
maiy he allowed tf appropriate, end en additional five percent
reduction may he allwed If the applicant proposes
alternative senior ctttzen transportation progrms; hwever,
tn no cue shall the reduction of parking slices exceed 25
percent of the total spaces requtred by Section 18.12 of this
ordinance. Public.street parking and t4ndem pa-king shall
not be counted in this rkiutranent. All rkiu~red perking
spaces shall be located entirely ,d~Mn the development,
.accessible to the units which they serve, and no parking
space shall be located Bore than :t50 feet Iron" the untt it is
des1 gned to serve. Parktng rkiut rments for other fact 1 ttt es
vithtn the development shall be sub:tact to the provisions of
Sectton 18.12 of this ordinance end may not be reduced.
HANDICAPPED PARK:ZNG. Not less than ten percent of the
required parking spices shall be designed and designated for
use by the handicapped. Handicapped parking spaces shall be
distributed evenly throughout the parking areas.
AGE RESTP, XCT]:ONS. The covenants, concHitons and restr4cttons
for the .cleveloFaent shall rkiutre that each permanent
resident tn each d~elltng unit shall be 55 years of age or
over. ·
I(AND]:CAPPED UNZTS. At least ten percent of the residential
units shall be adaptable for the handicapped. Those units
shall meet the standards set forth by the Deparl~ent of
Noust ng and Comaant ty Dave1 opment, Tt 11 e 24,. Part Z Z of the
Ca1 t forni a Aclntnt stratt ve Code.
Amended Effect4 yea
06-28-84 (Ord. 348.234Z)
SECT:ION 18.7. ZONZN6 FOR SENZOR C:I:TZZEN .DEVEJ. OPHENTS. lihenever a planned
· residential development for sentor ctttzens has been COnstructed Pursuant to
Secttons 18.5 and 18.6, or, whenever the Boird detemtnes that In area should
be considered for sentor ctttzen zontng, the area Be7 be Set for hearing
pursuant to the provisions of Sectton 20.:Z, et ski., to consider zoning that
would 1tmtt the occupancy of dwelling units vlthtn the area under construction
to the heretnafter 11sled mtntmum ages.
kfhenever the zoning s3ebol tn a zone classification on any offtctal zontng
plan map is followed'by the tntttals 'S.C.D." (Exanple: R-:I-S.C.D.), each
dwelltrig untt tn the area so zoned, that is occupied, shall be occupied by.at
least one person not less than 50 years of age and no person under :Z8 years of
age shal~ pemanently restde tn any dwelltng untt tn the.:zoned area.
152
ATTA~ NO. 10
SECTIONS 19.101, 19.102 AND 19,103 OF ORDINANCE NO. 348
CONGREGATE CARE FAC~.rI~,q STANDARDS
S~qTAPFRIPT'~I4TTM.pC. vrw
ARTICLE XIXd
CONGREGATE CARE RESIDENTIAL FACILITIES
SECTIOI~ 19.101. INTENT. It is the intent of the Board of Supervisors in
adopting this Article to provide alternative housing opportunities for those
· persons. capable of independent living who do not need the level of care
provided at convalescent facilities, The Board finds that this. Article will
provide needed housing for those persons who have been identified as impacted
groups by the Housing Elanant of the Canprehenstve General Plan. The Board
also' finds that this Article will provide a stan. dard for.distingUishing between
congregate care 'rest dentf el factlt ties and other mu1 tt-fmmtly uses.
SECTION 19,102. DEVELOPNENT STANDARDS, The following starterda of
development shall apply for congregate .care residential facilities.
a. Density. The allowable clanstry for a project shall not exceed the
density permitted by the un~rlytng zoning classification or the
applicable General Plan Land Use Category, .whichever is less.
b. Location'. The project shall be located in accordance with all
applicable developmental and locattonal guidelines under the
Comprehensive General Plan and shall be located in those areas
which-offer appropriate services for the residents of these
facilities, including necessary medical, transportation, shoppin;,
recreational and nutritional progrms.
c.. Elevators. No building shall be constructed that exceeds one
story in height unless it contains elevators for the use of the
occupants. Elevators shall be spaced in a manner which will
minimize the walking distance from the elevators to the
res'i dante al units.
d. Dwel 1 i nq Units.
1. The net livable area for each unit shall not be less .than 4DO
square feet for an efficiency unit, 550 square feet for a
one-bedroom unit, and 700 square feet for a two-bedroom unit.
2. Not less than four percent of the residential units shall be
~aCcesstble. for .the handicappod, and all other units 'shall be
adaptable for the handicapped. The hand-leap units shall '.be
distributed equally throughout the project. All handicap
units shall meet the stan~mr~ set forth in Title 24, Part II
of the California Aministrattve Code.
3. Kitchenettes may be permitted provided that they are sized to
meet the immediate needs of the occupants of the untt.
4. No more than thtrty percent of the units shall be efficiency
untts.
e. Hallways and Walkwan..Hallways should be kept to a minimum
length to avoid the appearance of an overstz~ home or an
institution. Five-foot wide paved pedestrian walkways shall be
installed between the dwelltrig units and the recreational areas of
the project. All hallways and pedestrian walkways shall be
maintained with a mtnim~ of five feet of unobstructed width and
280
adequate vertical-clearance to provide unobstructed walking
capability. Not less than one accessible route for the
handicapped to all on-site facilities shall be provided. Hallways
shall be designed to acc~nmodate the use of walkers, canes or
.. other mechanical assistance.
f. O n Space and Recreation Facilities. Not less than forty percent
~Fethe net area of the project.shall be used for open space,
recreational facilities, or a combination thereof. Not less than
twenty-ftv~ Nrcent of the required open space area shall be used
for active recreational facilities, such as pool, spa, tennis, an0
'gardentrig.by residents. Recreattonal,.publtc assembly and similar
.butl'o~ngs may be permitted w~l~htn the project if they are intende=
for the primary use of person residing within the project and are
located so as not to be detrimental to adjacent properties.
Yard Setbacks. Building setbacks frun a proJect's exterior
streets an0 boun~ry lines shall be the ss~e as those prescribe0
· by the 'zone in which the project is locate~; however, in no case
shall such building setbacks for any project be less than those
prescribed in the R-3 Zone.- The mintram building setback for
interior drives and parking areas shall be ten feet.
he
Buildin, HetOht. The height of buildings shall not exceed that
which is permitted in the zone in which the project is locate0.
The maxim~n permitted height limits must be reduced if it is
determined to be necessary for a planne0 development to achieve
c~npatibility with the area in which the development is locate~.
Trash Areas. Adequate enclosed trash pickup areas, convenient to
the resio)nts which they are intended to serve, shall be provi~e¢
in the project· Trash areas will be screen, 0 by a six-foot high
decorative bl ,ok wal 1.
Screeninq. A six-foot high decorative' block wall shall be
constructed on all project boundary lines to provide adequate
security an~ privacy. The exterior side of all block walls shall
-be coated with a protective coating that will facilitate the
removal. of' graffi ti.
Parkin;;. The ma~ber of required automobile storage spaces shall
be determined in accordance with Section 1B.12 of this ordinance
at the time of the approval of the project; however,
notwithstanding any provision of this ordinance to the contrary, a
twenty percent reduction in the total nanbar of required vehicle
parking spaces for rest dentt al* purposes may be allowed t f
appropriate, and an additional five percent reduction may be
allowed if the applicant proposes alternative senior citizen
transportation programs; however, in no case shall the reduction
of parking spaces exceed twenty-five percent of the total spaces
required by Section 18.12 of this orOlnance~ Public street
281 ~
parktng and tan~en parking shall not be counted in 'this
requtranent. All required parking spaces shall be located
entirely within the development, 'accessible to the units which
they serve, and no parking space shall be located more than 150
feet frcm the unit It ls designed to'serve. Parking requirments
for other facilities within the eveloi~ent shall be subject to
the provisions of Section 18,12 if this ordinance and may not be
reduced. Not less than ten percent of the required parking spaces
shall be designed and designated for use by the handicapped;
provided, however, that there shall..be It least one'desiilned and
designated handicapped parking space provided for each' handicapped
resident, Handicapped parking spaces shall. be distributed evenly
throughout the parking areas.
Access, The nanbar and location of vehicular access openings into
a project shall be as specified by the Road Cemissioner,
Projects must be located on a street with a minimum 66-foot
rt ght-of-way.
Supportive Services· Services that support the residents shall be
provided· At a miniram the following services.shall be provided.
1. Laundry Facilities· One (1) washing machine and dryer shall
be provided for every twenty (ZO) roans.
2. Housekeeping and Linen Service· At a minimum, weekly service
shall be provi dad.
3. Cm~nuntcattons. A "panic button," intercam or other' similar
device .shall be provi{led in each re;n so cmmanication with
the central office/security desk. is available.
4. Central Dining. A central dining roe shall be provided. The
size of the room shall be sufficient to accem~odate all of
residents. The minimm roe size shall be the product of the
proposed maximum nmber of residents in the facility
multiplied by five square feet per resident; however, in no
instance shall the central dining roam be less than 350 square
feet.
5. Niscellaneous Facilities. The following services are
pemi tted wi thin a Congregate Care Resi denti al Fatal i ty
provided .they '~ not exceed five percent of the total building.
of the. facility.. :
I:)Barber and Beauty Shops'·
Reltgtous Facilities.
(c) Cammartial uses that are canparable with the proposed
use and provide a service to the residents. Such uses
may be open to the general publtc,
Public Transit Access, A publtc transit turnout shall be included
within the project's design,
SECTION 19.103. DEVELOPNENT STANDARDS - INCREASED DENSITY.
19 above, unless otherwise 1tatted by I Cemmunity Plan, may
be pemitted if the project meets the following additional
gui de1 ands,
282
Area Services. The following services must be located
t~e following prescribed ~stances:
(a) ~gh~hood Shopping Center: 2/Z m~le.
(b) Recreation-Facilities ~h mentt~es ~s~gned for ~he
el erly:. 2 mtle.
(c) ~spttal FacUlty: 20 m~tes by ~bl~c or ~vate
tra~ ~ltt on.
(d) ~ed~cal Settees (DoctorSchrist): ~o m~es.
settees shall ~an the ~o~s~on o~ health care by
1teemed ra~ttt~onen at f~xe: locat~o~ ~ng
o~ft ce hou ~.
'(e) ' ~ency ~ces (F~armedtc): ftve mt~es
mer~ncy ~h~cl~.
(~) C~ntty ~r~ces (Soctal, E~cattona~, e~.): two
mt~es.
(g) Hass Transit Facility:
(~) ~ a ~ductton ~n t~ ~qu~ed pa~k~n~ spa~es
~requested then the ~act~t~ ~us~ ~ ~oca~e~
(Z) ~ a reduction ~n the required pa~k~ng spa~es
not ~quested, then t~ ~a~t~ty ~st ~
~/Z ~e o~ the pro~e~t unless tra~at~on ~ s
p~ov~ ~e~ by t~ ~a~ ~ tty.
P~o~e~t Des~ n. P~o~ec~s p~oposed un~ thtS se~ton sha~
mee~ the ~o~o~n~ requ~en~s, tn a~on to a~ '
~equtr~en~s o~ Sectton ~g.~OZ(c) through (n),
a. ~n SDa~e.
Pr~ va~e ODe~ SDace. Each unt ~ sha~ ~ ~ prov~ ~e~
p~vate us·able o~n spa~e. Pat~os sha~ ~ at ~eas~
~O0 square ~ee~ tn .area· Balconies sha~ ~ a~
80 square ~eet ~n area.
(a) Not less than ~orty-~e ~cent o~ the
area o~ a p~o~e~t sha~ ~ use~ ~o~ c~on o~n
spa~e. Not ~ess than ~enty-~ive ~cen~
the required c~on o~n spa~e area sha~
.used ~or :act~.ve ~creat~ ona~ ~a~ 1 ~ t~ es, such
as I>ool, spa, tennts, anti getdarting by
restc~ents. ·
(b) :]ncloor recreational/leisure space shall be
provtded tn the fore of a multipurpose or
recreational ~oam. The stze of the roa~ sha~l
be based on the ratio of 25 square feet of
floor area per unit provided. Zn no instance
shall the tom be less than 2,0DO square fee~.
Access. The n~nber and location of vehicular access
openings into a IroJect shall be as specified b~ the
Road Cammtss~oner. Projects must be located on a
street ~dth a minimum 66-foot :tght-of-vay, ~thtn
250 feet 'of a mass transit factl.tt~, or musZ prov~cie
approprt a~e transportat1 on for rest dents.
283
Denstry. A denstry 1norease of :100 percent over that permitted tn
Section 19.10;(a) above, unless othervise 1trotted by a Cemuntty Plan.
may be permitted tf the project. meets the folioring additional
gui de1 tnes.
1. Area Services. The following servtces must be located ~ithtn the
fol lo~ing prescribed distances:
a. Neighborhood Shopptng Center: :1/4 mtle.
b. Recreation Facilities with anentties destined for the elderly:
]mtle.
c, . Hospital Facility: 20 minutes by'public or private'
tra ns portltt on, :
d, Nedtcal Servtces (Doctor/Dentist): .one mile, Nedfcal services
shall mean the provision of health care by licensed
practitioners at fixed locations ~urtng standard office hours.
e. Emergency Services (Ftre/Parenedtc): five rotnut.as by energenc,v
yah1 cl as,
f. Cemmuntty Serfices (Soda1, Educational, etc,): one mile,
g. Hass Transtt Facility:
(:1) Zf a reduction in the required parking spaces ts request,c:
then the faciltty must be locat.ed vithtn Z50 feet of the
project,
(2) If a reduction in the required parking spaces is not
requested, then the facility must be w4thin :1/4 mile of
the project unless transportation is provided by the
Pro_~ect Desicjn. Projects proposed under this section shall mee~
the follo~n9 requtrenents, in addition to all requirenents of
Section :19.:102(c) through in).
a. 0~;; Space.
Pri vat, Open Space. Each untt shall be provided k-i th
private us,able open space. Patios shall be at least
:100 square feet tn area. Balconies shall be at least 8~
square feet tn area.
(2) Con~non 0 en Space.
(a) Not ~es.$ than fifty percent of the net area of a
project shall 'be used for cmmon open' space. No
less .than twenty-five.percent of the required crayon.
open'space w~11 be used for active recreational
facilities, such' as pool, spa, tennis, or gardening
by rest ~nts.
(b) ZnUoor recreationdill,taut, space shall be provided
tn the form of a multi purpose or recreational tom.
The size of the roe shall be based on the ratio of
:15 square feet'of rioor area per unit provided. %n
no tnst.ance shall the rom be less than Z,O00
square feet,
be
Access, The manbar and location of vehicular access openings into
a project shall be as specified by the Road Cemisstoner.
Projects must be located on a street w~th a minimum 66-foot
right-of-way, wtthtn 150 feet of a mass transit facility, or must
provide appropriate transportation for residents.
284
An 'increased dens~i ty pro.~ect must be located a Dtntn:u~ o~stance
frm any other 1noreased enstty pro~ect equal to the proouct of
the nmNr of untts' d the 1 arpr project multt pl ted by 50 feet;
proridee, ~ver, that tn no event shall t~ m~ni~ ~stance
'-Nteen an~ ~ ~nc~ased ~t~ p~jec~ ~ less than Z,320
feet.
SECTZON 19,104, RESTRICTIOI6,
a, The development shall be open to those Pasteants who ar~ capable of
demonstrating th.e mental cmpetence end phystcal abtllty to leave a
butldtng wtthout assistance of any other person,.
b, The prO;ject propOnent shall not proride envy setrice ~h'ich would requ'ire'
a 1'icense to be tssued by the.State of California, Th'is 'includes, but
ts not 1'imtted to, the follovrlng:
1, Ass'istance tn dress'ing, groom(ng, beth'ing and other personal
hygtene;
2. Ass'istence ~th taktng'med~catton;
3, Central stor'ing and ~strtbutton of meritcat'ions;
4. Arrangement of and assistance ~lth medical and clental care; and
5, Naintenance and supervision of restSant monies or property.
Added Effect~ ve:
1-15-87 (Ord. 348.2643)
285.
'ATrA~ NO. 11
SCHOOL DZSTRICT T-~--l-rER
S~VrAFF'P,z~7314T'Fi~.pC
TEMECULA VALLEY
Unified School District
8UPEIqlNTENDEkFT
Pmrmml. Novotney. EcLD.
BOARD OF EDUCATION
Dr, Dav,cl Eu,cl~
Roi~ Vlnoerltllk
Join F. Sparkmen
Waft SwiCkll
Mee~e,
Barbara Tooker
March 9, 1992
The City of Temecula
Planning Department '
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, Ca. 92590
Attention: Saied Naaseh
Subject: Change of Zone No. 21, Tentative Tract Map No. 27314
We would like to Take This opportunity TO address The above referenced Change
of Zone and Tentative Tract Map submitted by the Linfield Christian School.
This project consists of 50.4 acres subdivided into a nine (9) hole gold course
and a senior citizen housing and nursing complex,
· We are very concerned about the compatibility of This project due to its location
-next to the Temecula Valley High School complex. This complex consists of
the football stadium and other athletic fields, tennis courts, and the main
campus. The footballstadium experiences heavy usage throughout the daytime
and evening hours, and is contiguous to the proposed development. During the
day, it is not uncommon for the high school to host pep rallies for the entire
student body (over 2,000 students), as well aS. other activities which in the
past have included U.S. Armed Services helicopter landings and "rock" bands.
Evening activities include home games for the Temecula Valley High School
football team, which. will now increase in frequency and attendance size due
to the reconfiguration of the. league. Other athletics such as track and field
competition and related sports are also common during daytime and evening
hours; This stadium receives intensive use by The community, which includes
football, soccer and related events. The noise level and bright evening lights
from this stadium will adversley affect the quality of living for the neighboring
project.
The newly constructed tennis courts are due for installation of coin operated
lights, and will be open to the community after school hours, These lights will
contribute To the evening lighting situation which may also have a negative
impact on this project. It should also be noted that the School's public address
31350 Rancho Vista Road/Temecula. CA 92592 1 {714) 676-2661
system is audible from The proposed development:s site,. and this system is
utilized throughout the school day.
Therefore, due to the extensive use of all of the high school's facilities
throughout The year by both the school district and the community at large, we
feel that the above referenced project is incompatible. Although we will not
oppose this project, we would like to state that under no circumstances will we
accept any' responsibility for the impact our stadium, tennis courts and other
related facilities will have on the neighboring senior housing and nursing
complex, nor will we conform To any demands made in the future should any
of these facilities become an issue with this development. We also request that
a full disclosure be made to any prospective buyer or renTer of this proposed
project that The above referenced conditions exist, and that these conditions are
not subject To mitigation.
Thank you for your time and interest concerning this matter.
T~.ecula Valley Unified School District
Dr. Patricia Novo~tne
Superintendent
PNIbk
ATTA~ NO. 12
· ARTHUR ANDERSON STtJDY
DEV~ OPMENT PROGRAM RECO~A~O~
59
Patio Residential
ConSreSate
Skilled BursinS/
Personal Care
Senior Center
Total
T-4~iebi Site
240 30
200 6.75
78 ]..~t].
It/jL
ll'/a 2.49-
5.1.8 52.68
7.91
29.63'
43.09
0.00
0.00
9.83
Source: A~berc A. Webb &Associates, LanTVeselyArchiteccs;
Arthur Andersen ReaZ Estate Services Group.
· he master pZan encompasses 52.6 acres vhich for desiSnpurposes has been
segregated into five planninS-areu correspondinS to the di~erent uses
included. PlanninZ Area Z, desiSned for active adult patio/tovnhome Products,
has 30.34 acres, vhile PlanninS Area II, desiSned for the conSreSace care
layinK faciliL7, has s total 6.'75 acres. 3~e skilled nursinS/persona~ care
faciliLT has been planned on .1.al acres in PlinninS Area ~, vhlle r. he
course encompasses ~1.29 acres in PlanninS Area iV. Finally, r~he senior
'community eenter vat. bin Plm-,t~ Area-V has been desjaZzed on. 2~49 acres. A
total of. 5~8 dvellinS units are included in the master plan, yieldinS an
overall densiLT of 9.83 units per acre.
Active Adult Patiorlo~mhomes mnd Golf Course
PlazminSAre$ I includes 240 patio/tovnhomes clustered in duplex and ~ourplex
str~ctures, (See 2able IX-2). Each m~Lt has been desilnedvith a rear patio
vhich opens up to either open space or loll course frontale. 2ovahome units
DEVTL'T-fil~ pRO~TI'AM k,-CO .... --,uAqeZOlq~
have been p~aced at the interior of the fourpip- clusters to allow for second
floor or loft ~ndov opportunities, Vhich is · major msrketin$ issue for ~hese
tTpes of units vi~h patio units positioned a~ ~he end of clusters. Fourplexes
have bean clustered in ~he Ticinit7 of 2olf course greens so ~ha~ .prime 2olf
'Course Vievs comp.easate for higher densities vi~h respect to pricing. and'
marke~abilitT .'
FOur to five floor pin are recommended for Uhe developmant, wi~lx an average
unit size of approximately 1,150 square feet. An average base price of j105 per
square foot in 1992 dollars is ~hought to be achievable wi~h an average unit
premium of jl0,000. The recommended phasing plan calls for r~hree incremants of
developmant, each vi~h 80 units and constructed in successive years from 1993 to
1995. Monthly absorption 'is estimated at five to eight units. A 5,000 to 6,500
square foot recreational facilit7 should be ~he canterpiece of ~he communit7
of'ferin2 a range of exercise facilities along vi~h activit~y rooms for billiards,
cards and related activities.
the golf copse usocial:ed vit. b the de~elo:ime~t ~m a ~1 ~e ~ole ~e~.
a ~272 ~ul ~ee, ~ to s 15 ~:c~c dtaco~c ~m daily g:e~- fees
ass~ 40 ro~ ~~, ~s ~ fee ts rec~ed u a dtsco~
proZru .co ~eo~ers ~ ~e c~~,.. ~ 1,200 squre 'foOt. pro.
shop/s~arcer Zaci~i~ is rec~~ ~or ~e Course~ No fo~ or beverage
facilities are recom~ed for ~co~oraci~ in ~ sca~er faci~i~ based on
its prox~i~ ~o residnCial ~s,
LIt. hough ve have noc completed aa/y market Investigations vtr. h respect to r. he
potential performance of r. he course, ve believe r. bat it is · communtLT amenity
vhtch vtll produce stgnlftcan~ value, Eve as a sam11 course it* provides r. he
cormunity vir~ enhanced marketability to s. ~arge~ m~rke~ vhich is keen on
recreational activities and lifesLTle and alloys ~he project ~o compete .
eff. ec=ively vi~h or~her competitive communt~ies offering i similar amezit7, In
addition, ~he course produces .substantial financial returns for the proJec~ by
allovin& frontage premiums for ~he patio/~ovnhomes aside from the opera~ini
revenue generated by r. he Course .i~self,
Conareaa=e Care T.tVtne Factlttw
A 200-unit Con2regate Care Living Facility has been designed in Yl"'""t-!
Area II, (See Table IX-3), vith the unit miz of 40 studio units, SO 1-bedroom
units, 80 2-bedroom mLi~S and a common area of 25,000 square feet. ~he averale
studio ~Li~ size in the proJec~ has been designed at 420 square feet~ while the
average 1-bedroom is 650 square feet. Units vtth 2-bedrooms have been designed
at 1,000 acidare ~eet. Gmmon c'ea ~eaturea :L~ 1:he proJec". are recomxended
tuclu~e k/tchen facilities of approximately 1,000 square feet, dining
v! .th seatin2 capacit7 of 130 interior seats and erieriot patio 25 seats.
Recreation facilities should iuclude: ac~ivit7 rooms for ~ards, television,
library and billiards; .service facilities such as .a beauty salon, barber. shop
and conv-ntence store: an exercise facility, a. pool/spa~ and men's and vomen°s
locker rooms.
Achievable mon~J~ly rental rates expressed in 1992 dollars are esthnated at g998
per montJx for stud/o units, gl,500 per month for i bedroom units and g2,037 for
2 bedroom units. An achievable double occupancy fee is at g475 in 1992
dollars. Stablized occupancy .has been projected at 90 percen=, occurtin2 in
1996.' The recommended service packa2e included in the montaxl~ rontal' fee
meals per month, veekl~ mid and linen service, unit roedice/alert
utilities .and scheduled transportation.
DF.A"Ip,JflrIrX' 'PRI~pAWI 'gql~C'O
Pm'vm4~l ~rea II
Con/relate Care Livin/racilit7
Develoj ,,t_ tro~ lec,: -'-~ions
200
Averm~e ga.'Lt Size
- Studio
- !'Bedroom-
- 2-Bedroom
420 eq.
:650 eq.
ZOO0 mq.
Unit Mix - S~udio
- 1-Bedroom
- 2-Bedroom
40
80
80
Percentlee
20o02
40.02
Bates (Z992)
Studio
2-Bedroom
2-Bedroom
Double Occsz;mncy (additional)
MOnt:hlV
$ 998
2,502
2,037 ·
475
Per So. Ft.
$ 2.37
2,31
2,04
Sr~bilizedOccupmlc7
Subilized Year
Service Pac]mSe Included hlntiX Fee: - 45 fiNesis Per Month
- Weekly MAid mad Linens
- Unit Medical ilert Systems
- Utilities
- Trauspoz~ation
izet Features .'.
MArketinS Office
rdtchen' Facilities'
D~dml Facilities
Lo~nBe/Canl Room
Exercise Boom
Salon tad Barber Shop
Library
T.V. Room
idministrsti-re Office
Convenience Shop
Mail Room
BiLllard ROom
Pool/Spa
Men's Locker Room
Women*s LoCker Room
(Joint v~th m]~ed mJ-u6 fae:!.lJ.t'y)
90.0~
1996
25,000 sq, ft.
~,000 eq. ft.
155 seats
175 spaces
DlSrrr.n~ FIOCi'AM
led Nur~i~e/Personal Csre F.-ci]
50-bed skilled nutsin2 facilit7 linked ~ole~er ~ 5~t persoul ure
facili~ is rec~ed h pl:-e4~ ~ III, (See Table ~). ~e l~e
be~e~ ~e ~o facili~ies Is a ~,200 s~e fooC c~ area desired
-a~inis~ra~ive o~f~ces, a d~ facili~ ~' 60 seats, ~~ faCili~ o~
abouc 600 sq~re ~eeC, a lo~e~ ro~'2 a libra~. ~e s~lled nursi~
facili~ is reco~ed ~o bye 6 pr!vace ro~ ~ ~ s~-privace roon. ~e
axerqe size of bo~ ~e pers~ c~e ~cs 2 ~e ~lled nursi~ roon are
es~aced a~ ~0 s~re feeu.
The ackievable avera2e monthly service fee for personal care x~t~s iS esCfinaUed
at 52,055, while skilled nursin2'ra~es for private and senzi-private
accommodations are estima~ed at 5125 and 2100, respec~ively (1992 dollars).
Based on the occupancy charac~eris~ics of o~her facili~ies, an occupancy mix
the proposed facility has bean es~ima~ed as 50 percan~ privaUe insurance, 37
percent HediCal and 13 percanS Medicare. S~ablized occupancy has been projected
at 90 percent for ~he skilled nutsin2 facilit7 and 85 percen~ for ~he personal
care facili~y. The first s~ablized year for bo~h ~he personal care ~acilit7 and
~he skilled nursing facility is projected ~o' be 1996.
TAN~IX-4
Nunbet of Skilled BursinS Beds
- Private .
-~Sesd-Privace '~
!haber of Pe~ _,?,-'t Gaze Un:l. ts
AveraSeDniC Size - Personal Care
- Sldlledllursing
2killedluraingDaJJ~late8 C1992) - Pri?a~e
- Semi-Private Room
Pmonal Cue~m-hl~Service Fee (1992) - - Single Occupancy.
- Double Occupancy (additional)
Skilled lluntxqOc~M.'l.z - Private Insurance
- NediCal
- NediCare
S~abilized - Skilled Nutsin2
- Personal Care
S~abil~zed Tear
C~
.flu Feecoru
AdlLtniscrative 'Offices
Dixdn2 Facilities (60 seaca)
r~itchen Facilities (1,000 sq.
Lounge Area/T.V. Room
Library
.. 50
6
44
5O
400 sq.
400 sq.
$125
95
$2,055
$450
85Z
1996
12,200 8q.
Senior-0rie~ced Co~,micv Center
A 2.49 acre parcel mz T. he site has ben se.C_ aside for development as a senior-
oriented corntumult7 caster. It is us~md Chac this parcel will be deeded Co ami
developed b~ the CiC7 o~ Temecula. Cmaversscions with individuals in the CiCT's
parks and recreation-department ideatilled Che coammicies of lrvine and Rucho
Bernetrio as having model facilities and prolrams. As pare of our market
analysis ve conducted a survey of the ceaxcers ia these communiCies u yell as a
number of others.
In general, the facilities ra~ed in size from approzimacel~ 10,000 co 15,000
· square feec, situated on between 1 and 2 acres. T~pically, a cenuer consists
a large multi-purpose room, card room, libra7, kitchen, and adminiscracive
offices. In some facilities There is a cma~erence room or larSer auditorium' as
well.
The centers provide a .wide array of recreational proSrams and activities in
addiCiom co.a daily hoc lunch program. These accivicies include card clubs,
educational classes, exerCise'classes,. doctor screenings, legal advice,
shopping and site-seeing excursions. The facilities provide services co.becWeex
100 and 250 semiors daily. Facilic7 profiles for chose senior centers surveyed
follows.
Basic Features
SUBJECT TO CP, ANGE
IRVINE SENIOR CENTER
Irvtne, CA
Summary of Services
Nov-91
0perfdng Hours: 8:00am - 5:00pm M-F Contact Person: JarL Calhoun
Size: Approximately 2 Acres Telephone Number: 714/724-6800
· Building:. 11,000 SQ FT . Addr~__-_-: 3 Sandburg Way
..; . Single Story . Irvine, CA
Year Built: 1978 (Culver & Sandburg)
Recreational Facilities
The ii~ucture consifts of 2 offices for the full*tim personnel and I office for the staff; a conference room;
a card room with an approximate capacity of 110 persons housing 10-12 card Tables seating 4 persons
each; 8 multi-purpose room with an approximate capacity of 175 persons; a library;, 8 full service kitchen; and
a ballroom with a stage.
Recreational PTogmmslAcdvtties
Programs Coordinated with Local and State Programs
City-Sponsored TRIPS Progreta
Outreach Program
Live Bands Playing Big Band-Era Music
Language CJasses
Relaxation Classes
Aerobics
Billiards
· Food Services
Bingo
The center offers a daily hot hunch meal program serving approximately 40 persons daily.
The price for the meals varies with age (i.e,, Senior / Nonsenior) and hot verses cold.
Comments
Last year, over 1 O0 volumeere donated more than 25,000 hours. In adcltdon, much of the equipment and
furniture used by the center am dormad, The mating varies as The number of ssnim and the number
of program offmad varies. Another source of ftmda ls through rental income for the use of some of the
facilities for weddings, receptions, meetings, workshops. seminars, classes, etc.
SUB.iF..CT ';'C)
Basic Features
Opersdng Hours:
She:
Building:
Year Built
8:30~m - 4:30pro M-F
Approximately 1 Acre
'SQ FT Not Available
Sin01. Stow
1989
Contact Person:
Telephone Number:
Address:
Fencis Bass
6191 487-9324
18402 Bernardo Ddve
Rancho Bernetrio, CA
92127
Recreational Fedides
The structure consists of Ipproxinmtlly 6 offices, 3 of which ~ TO the.senior center for me
Director, Office Manager, and Staff; a large multi-pumas. room (hag) with an appro~mate
capacity of 130 parsons; 8 smaller multi-purpose room (hall) with an approximate capicily
of 30 persons; a patio for certain outdoor functions; a small computer room; a smafi kitchen with basic
appliances; a separate privately-owned liebowling facility;, and l separate privaTely-owned Tennis
court fqcility.
Recreational Pro0re,,.slAcevide
Dances
Cards (Bridge, Pinnocle,. Etc,)
Fund Raising Events (Bake Sales, Waik-a-thons, Etc.)
Excercise Classes (Aerobica, Karate, ETc.).
Medicare Consultation
%~fKIow / Widower Group Meadrigs
Travel Club ( Small Tripe)
Educational Classes Writing, Geography, Etc.)
Fashion Shows
Bingo (Fridays)
Computer Classes
Legal Advice
Doctor Screenings
Lawn Bowling
Tennis
Food Services
No Daily Services
Pot Lucks and Picnics. are Common
Comments
Employees:
Full-Tim Director
NIl-Tim Office Manager
Part*Tim Maintenance Assistant
Part-T~ne Representative ProVided by Adult Protective Services
Varying Part-Time Staff Depending on the Daily Activities
This is a very active senior co.mr with dab/vide approximating 100-200 persons. There are approximately
100 regular volunteers providing over2,000 hours of service per mr:' Staff and volunteers put out a
monthly newsletTer I calendar to all members. The laced Chamber of Ca.mere. distributes limited copies
of the newalert. r, end all others ale mailed to the members only. The center receives no funding from
the city and minimal funding from the state. It re~as mainly on limited donations, extensive fund-raising,
and periodic hall renteLi. The center is 2 Years old and has approximately 1500 members. The center's
equipment and furniture are both donated and purchased.
E~b Features
Operating HourS:
Size:
-. Building:
Year Built:
· :00am - 5:00pro M-F
Approximately 2 Acres
· 15,400 SQ .IT
Two Story
1989 (New}
The struc~Jra is approximately 28~300 ere feet in size, I~Wevir, the eanie' center'only occupies 54% er
15,400 ~luare feeT. The structure consists of · reception area; I lounge. with · fireplace, sofas,. chairs,
end · big-screen TV; en auditorium whioh b 2,500 e4uara feet in alz8 end divisible into 3 smaller mores
if needed; 4 of fie, - 1 far the coerdinamr and 3 re' approximately 5 other fall- and gert-time mzff; a small
conference mum; an art studio; a dance studio; · game room; an outdoe' courtyard with badaM
faciliti,; · ribraW; · full-sea kitchen; and · dining room which is 2,500 solera feet in size.
Recreational Programs/Activities
Bingo
Card·
Exercbe CLssse· through Mar·cost· College
Foreign Language Classes
Musicals
Dance·
Doctor Screenings [Skin, Eyes, Etc.)
Am end Crafts
Movie·
Legal Counseling (Mainly WilLs)
Various Seminars
Board Game
Insurance Counseling
Travel Premimations
Nu~,;~n Program
Bus Services
Food Service
Lunch is served daily to seniors for · donation of $1.50 and to all others at · cost of 42.50. The' aversge
menu consists of an aplxlizer, main course, hit.. vegetable, occasional dam and · choice of milk,
ms, or coffee which is served to approximately 150' persons a day. -Them is also · daily 'meals on wheels".
program in which meals are derivered to the homes of al~mximatsly 50'senior· who are unable to.
visit the center. Daily meals era not cooked at'me center but ·re catered in from me local nu~,~0n center.
Comments
Full-Time Employees:
C, oordinator
Secretary
Ntmtdon Site Manager
Part-Tune Employees: 2 Facity Maintenance An·slam·
3 Ven Drivers
MancOl.,jut All·tint to Coordinator
2 Receptionists
The center tax approximately 15G. reOuler volunteers who dotram over 3,000 hours of malt time per year.
The center receives most of its funding from the city parks 8ncl recreation fund as welJ as Ijmi~ad grants
from the American Agency on Aging. Additional avenues are eblained Through faciliZy rehi, ts fix
weddings, receDtions, meetings, etc. The .building is Misted with the Car·shad Unified Scheol Disaiat as
well es the local nu~,;~;on center. A newdetw / calendar is distributed to all members on a menthlv basil.
Basic Features
Operating Hours: ' -
S~-e:
Building:
Year Buil~
8:00am - 4:00pro M-F
· Approximately 2 Acres
13,000 SQ FT
Single Stow
1980
Cornam Person: Maureen
Telephone Number. 6191966-4144
Address: 455 Country Club Lane
0ceanside, CA 82054
The structure consists 'of 3 off'ms - 1 housing .the Dimmr, I hOusing the Assistant Dimmr, end I housing
parslegels, tax adviers, and insurance advisors; a large m~lti-gumoss room used for the nutrition and
recreation progrants with mn approXimate capacity of 240 persons; a randlet multi-purpose room divisible
into either 1 large room wiffi an approximate capacity of 150peruone or 6 smaller room with an approximate
capacity of 30 persons each; a full-service kitchen; and an outdoor facility for shuffleboard and horseshoes.
Recreational Programs/Activities
Seminars (VVilson Trust, Social SecuriTy, Medicers)
Exercise Classes
Line, Round, and Tap Dancing
Cards
Board Game
Blood Pressure Tests
Ear and Eye Exams
Fund-Raising {Craft Fairs, Pancake Breakfasts, Raffles)
Travel Program
Legal Counseling
Edumtional Classes
Arm and Crafts
Choir Group
Nu~,;iion Program
Shuffleboard
Horselhoaa
Food Services
Lunch is served daily to seniors for · donation of $1.75 and to all others at a cost of $2.50. The average
menu consists of an appetizer, main come, fruit, vegetable, dessert, and · choice of milk, tea,
or coffee, There ls also I'dally "moais on wheels" program in which meals are delivered to the homes
of those seniors. who are unable TO viSiT me center.
Comment~
Full-Time Employees:
Director
Assistant Director
Maintenance Asiarant
PaR-Time Employees:
2 Additional Maintenance AssisTants
The carrier has at leeat 12 regular volunteers on a daily basis and alaproximaTely 200 each month.
In addition, a volunteer or senior, member donates time daily as the cenTer'a receptionist. The mr
receives STate funding mainly for its nui,;i~on center and very limited city funding. IT does rabe additional
funds through the rental of ill facilities tot weddings, raceDlions, meetings, etc. The income derived trr
rsrrtai activities ls given beck to the City of Oceanside for use in various city ptog~m,4 such as
the aenior center. A newsletter / calendar is distributed to ell .b.e.,d~s.& on 8 mO,,bLdy basks.
Basic Features
Operating Hours:
She:
Building:
Year Built:.
BJE T TO CNA.NG ' '
9:00am - 5:00pro M-F
-Approximately '2 Acres
Approximately 15,000 SQ FT
Two Story
1976
Comct Person:
Telephone NumbeP,
Adclrees:
Ron Cole
'714 / 929-0086
305 East Devonshire
P.O. Box 387
Hemet, CA 92546
Recreational Facilities
The structure consists of 7 offices utilized by the enter manager, information manager, volunteer ·
coordinator, nu~;~;on manager, ind vsrioul full. and I}art-time sixif;, 8 multi-purpose room with an approximate
capacity of 400 persons (divilible into 2 rooms if needed); i senior wing with an approximate capacity of
200 persons (divisible into 2 rooms if needel: a. dining room with an appmximam capacity of 180 parsons;
and a full service kitchen.
Recreational ProgremslActivitie
Nutritio~ Program
Prime of'Life Program
Blood Pressure Tests.
Medical'Seminars
Occasional Doctor Screenings
Outreach Program
Travel Program
Housing Program
Sunday Sing-Alongs
Bus Services
Retired Senior Volunteer Program
ArmsndCrafta
Partners Help Program
Cede "
Board Games
Dancercise
Swinging Singles Group
Bgliard$
Dance Cia~es
Food Services
Lunch is served daily To seniors for a donation of $1.50 and To all others at a varying rate. The average
menu. consists of an appetizer, main coerce, fruit, vegetable, dessert, and a choice of milk, tea, or coffee.
There is also a daily 'meals on wheels" program in which meals are delivered To the homes of those'
seniors who are unable to visit the center. '
Comments
Full-Time Employees:
Center Manager
Information Manager
Nutrition Manager
Volume Coordinator
STaff Assistant
Part-Time Employees: Rental Assistant. for Set-Up end Cleaning
The canTer has approximately 12 dail~ volumesre assisting as many ms 400 daily visitore.' The center
receives a decent amount of city Jnd state fuming and also has an occasional fund-raiser. In addition
to the employees listed above, the center also contracts with a local cleaning company for representatives
to come and clean the facilities on a regular basis. A newsletter / Galende is distributed To all
members on a monthly basis.
Basic Features
Operating Hours: '~ 8:00am - 5:00pro M-F Contact, Person: K~ran
S'.;e: -. . Approximately 2 Acres Telephone Number: 619/323-5689
Building: 12,000 SQ FT _ Addmax: 480 South Sunrise
'Single Stow him Springs, CA
Year Built: 1990 92262
Recreational Facilities
The slzucture 'consists of eppmximmaly 6 offices which' are u~ed by or for (1) The executive director,
(2) the administrative aistsnt, (3) the 0utreach director, [4) Board meetings, (5) special meetings, and
(6} 6 office staff;, main lounge with a fireplace, sofas, end chairs for small conversations; an
auditorium with an approximate capacity of 285 persons; a multi-purpose room with an approximate
capacity of 150 parsons; s full-service kitchen; a library; an ar~ and crafts room; a community room;
and 5 counseling rooms.
Recreational Programs/Activities
Medical Counseling (Medicare, Prescription Drugs, Etc.)
Medical Screening
Blood Pressure Tests
Dance Classes
Exercise aasses
Arts and Crafts Classes
Distribution of Local Travel Agency Discounts
Fund-Raising {Senior Olympics. Black-Tie Ball, Senior Expo)
Seminars
Bingo
Foreign Language Classes
Orchestra Group
Choir Group
Board Games
Cards
Food Services
Lunch is served daily to guests of all ages fo~ a donation of $1.50. The average menu consists of
an appetizer, main course, fruit, vegetable, dessert, and. s choice of milk, tea. or coffee.
Comments
Full-Time Employees:
Executive Director
Administrative A~simant
Outreach Director
Secretary
Maintenance Assisr3nt
Part-Time Employees:
Trde 5 Program .Representative Provided by The City of Riveraide
The center has approximately 100 regular velunteere each month. ApproxinllTIiy 150 SeniOrs visit
the center each day. The center ,receives limited city Ind state funding. It raises some revenue through
fund-raising activities and me remainder Through the rental of its facitilites for weddings, receptions, etc.
A newelattar./calendar is distributed to ell members on a monthly basis.
ATTA~ NO. 13
~sc~,w.~,ovs co~x~c~
S~TA~I4TTM,pC
4JQ. I.1B
July 2, 1992
Mr. and Mrs. Robert Pipher
41825 Green Tree Road
Temecula, CAlifornia 92592
Dear Bob and Dotti~:
Jim Adare and I would like to thank you for taking the time to meet with us on the 10th' of
June. We appreciate you positive comments re~arding our plans for the development of the
school property. We want to build a facility here that will blend in well with our
community and our neighborhood.
If you should have any other questions, be sure to ca!!. Also, we will keep you informed as
we progress.
Sincerely,
Kim W. 'Eldridge
Director of .Development
'P. S. We will be setting up a meeting with John and Lindy Telesio when Jim returns from
his trip.
:~!950 Pauba ~oad I Temecula, C.,alilorm 92592 1 71,1..67(>.8111
July 2, 1992
Mr. Ken Lewsader', President
Villa Avanti H.O.A.
c~o Elite Community ManaEement
27710 Jefferson Avenue, Suite 106
Temecula, CAlifornia 92590
Jim Adare and I would like to thank you for taking the time to meet with us on the 17th of
June..We appreciate your positive comments regarding our plans for the development of
the school property. and we hope the colored picture of the project was helpful to you in
showing our plans to your board.
As The Lirdield School grows, we desire to be a good community neighbor and we would
appreciate any concerns or comments as we progress.
Thanks again.
Sincerely,
Mr. Kim W. Eldridge
Director of Development
te
31950 Pauba Pad I Tenzn~ Cdifvmin ~25~2 1 714-676~8111
"D*' )iMENT 'FUND,
RALPH DOIEINEITE
C'.htol Ex(~.u~wI OIl~-'er
July 14, 1992
Mr. K~rel Lin~emans
city of Temecula
43172 ~usiness Park Dr.
Temecula, CA 92390
To the Temecula [lanning Committee and City Council:
As Chief Executive Officer of Church Development Fund and Founder
of Christian Retirement living,.Inc., I assure you of the vital
interest of the Christian Churches of the states of California and
Arizona in the Senior-Oriented Residennial Community of Temecula.
We have been earnestly seeking a place for the senior members of
our 250 churches in California and the 60 churches in Arizona.
This development on the Linfiel'd Chriz=ian School property appears
to be the ideal location.
I have carefully perused the Market and Financial Analysis and
Recommendation for this project prepared by the Arthur Anderson Co..
of Los Angeles. I am most impressed with the quality and
thoroughness of this presentation.
It is my hope that the Planning committee and City Council of
Temecula will give the green lig)lt to this most needed development.
The combination of Patio/Townhomes, Congregate Care and Skilled
Personal Care complex will provide a unique community for the
growing senior population'of SOuthern california. We would bemost
pleased to direct the Senior members .of our churches to take
residence in such a community.
neerely 'rs,
RD: lrl
A Financial Meislry Sef~ the ~ CNItgflel of CIlitOrlNI
905 S. Euclid Slreet. Fullerton. C, allfomia 92632 TeloDtmne: (~'14) 44%0804 · FAX (?14) 447-8585
ATTACHMENT NO. 4
DEVELOPMENT FEE CHECKLIST
R:\S~STAFFRPT~ICZ. CC 6/1/93 klb 9
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEVELOPMENT FEE CHECKLIST
CASE NO. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 27314, AMENDMENT NO. 3
The following fees were reviewed by Staff relative to their applicability to this project.
Fee
Habitat Conservation Plan
(K-Rat)
Parks and Recreation
(Quimby)
Public Facility
(Traffic Mitigation)
Public Facility
(Traffic Signal Mitigation)
Public Facility
(Library)
Fire Protection
Flood Control
(ADP)
Condition of ADDrOval
Condition No. 15
Condition No. 5
Condition No. 89
Condition No. 84
Condition No. 5
Condition No. 98
Condition No. 42
R:\S\STAFFRPT~21C2.CC 611193 kro 10
ITEM NO. 15
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
/f~Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
June 8, 1993
Temecula Shuttle - General Public DiaI.AoRide Proposal
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council review the attached proposal submitted by Temecula Shuttle to
implement a General Public Dial*A-Ride Service and provide direction to Staff.
BACKGROUND:
Temecula Shuttle is requesting that the City Council award them the exclusive right to operate
the Dial-A-Ride program as described in the attached proposal for a period of five (5) years.
The proposed public transportation service would consist of a fleet of radio dispatched
propane-powered mini-vans that would be available from 6:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. on
weekdays and from 6:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m. on weekends, 365 days per year. The vans
would respond to calls on a first-received basis and would also provide regularly scheduled
pick-ups on a daily, weekly, or monthly basis. The system would operate exclusively within
the City Limits of Temecula with the possible exception of areas like local hospitals or the
police station. The Public/Traffic Safety Commission has reviewed the proposal and listened
to a presentation but did not take an official action on the proposal.
Temecula Shuttle anticipates that the pilot program consisting of two vans could be
operational within ninety (90) days of Council approval. To implement the proposed program
it would be necessary for the Council to appropriate approximately $110,000 to purchase
vehicles, equipment, and advertising.
The proposal anticipates that the City of Temecula will pursue Transportation Development
Act funds through the Riverside County Transportation Commission to fund the program's
annual operating cost. The additional revenue generated through the fare box may be used
to expand the program.
The program as proposed would place the operator in charge of all day-to-day operations
(similar to the City's waste contract) with the City being responsible for setting fare box
-1- PwO5~agdrpt~93~ehuttle.tem 060193
revenues, advertising, program administration, and pursuing grants funds. The cost analysis
attached to the proposal indicates that the average annual cost for a three {3) year period
would be approximately $252,000.
While a General Public Dial*A-Ride system can reduce traffic congestion, air pollution, and
provide greater flexibility to the traveling public, there is still a question as to whether this
service is cost effective in Temecula at this time. No statistical data was submitted with the
proposal to indicate a magnitude of demand. The cost analysis also does not take into
consideration the additional City expenses necessary to monitor and administer the program.
The additional City incurred expense could increase the annual cost of the program by
$75,000 a year to $327,000.
After reviewing the proposal, the Council may wish to request qualifications/proposals from
various operators that provide this service to obtain the most cost efficient service prior to
entering into an exclusive contract with any one them.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The proposal requests a one-time appropriation of $110,000 to cover start-up expenses.
The average annual operating expenditures may be funded through Transportation
Development Act grant funds.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Temecula Dial-A-Ride Proposal
2. Public/Traffic Safety Commission Minutes
3. Temecula Shuttle Letter 4/27/93 - Fees
4. Temecula Shuttle Letter 5/10/93
cc: Public/Traffic Safety Commission
-2- PwO5%agdrpt%93\ehuttle.tem 060193
Chairman Guerriero asked that a report from the Fire Department on the '"first
responder" be placed on the next available agenda.
3. Temecula Shuttle
Ed Dool, owner and operator of Temecula Shuttle, gave a Presentation on a proposed
Dial-A-Ride service which he will be presenting to the City Council and distributed a
copy of a transit rider survey which is currently be conducted. Mr. Dool explained that
he will be asking the City Council to approve funding for two vehicles and $20,000 for
start-up costs.
Chairman Guerriero asked Mr. Dool if he had contacted RTA about a Dial-A-Ride
service which could be implemented in Temecula.
Mr. Dool stated that Temecula is scheduled for a Dial-A-Ride program in 1995 through
the RTA.
Chairman Guerriero stated that he would like to see the results of the Transit Rider
Survey.
Chairman Guerriero declared a recess at 8:25 P.M. The meeting reconvened at 8:35 P.M.
City Parkina Ordinance
Sgt. Jim Domenoe distributed a copy of Ordinance 91-16 and asked that the
Commissioners review the Ordinance and make suggestions for possible modifications
or amendments, which will be brought back to the Commission for discussion.
Chairman Guerriero suggested that the Commission, working with the Police
Department formulate a weekly "Traffic Safety" column in one of the local
newspapers.
Director Serlet suggested that staff discuss the idea with the local newspapers' and
report back to the Commission.
e
Soeed Humos
Tim Serle't presented the staff report. He suggested that staff prepare a Speed Hump
policy for review and discussion by the Commission.
Chairman Guerriero stated he would like to tour the areas where speed humps which
have been implemented in San Diego prior to discussing a proposed policy.
P/TSMIN02/25/93
-2-
3/06/93
Chairman Guerriero asked that a report from the Fire Department on the "first
responder" be placed on the next available agenda.
3. Temecula Shuttle
Ed Dool, owner and operator of Temecula Shuttle, gave a presentation on a proposed
Dial-A-Ride service which he will be presenting to the City Council and distributed a
copy of a transit rider survey which is currently be conducted. Mr. Dool explained that
he will be asking the City Council to approve funding for two vehicles and $20,000 for
start-up costs.
Chairman Guerriero asked Mr. Dool if he had contacted RTA about a Dial-A-Ride
service which could be implemented in Temecula.
Mr. Dool stated that Temecula is scheduled for a Dial-A-Ride program in 1995 through
the RTA.
Chairman Guerriero stated that he would like to see the results of the Transit Rider
Survey.
Chairman Guerriero declared a recess at 8:25 P.M. The meeting reconvened at 8:35 P.M.
City Parkina Ordinance
Sgt. Jim Domenoe distributed a copy of Ordinance 91-16 and asked that the
Commissioners review the Ordinance and make suggestions for possible modifications
or amendments, which will be brought back to the Commission for discussion.
Chairman Guerriero suggested that the Commission, working with the Police
Department formulate a weekly "Traffic Safety" column in one of the local
newspapers.
Director Serlet suggested that staff discuss the idea with the local newspapers and
report back to the Commission.
Soeed Humos
Tim Serlet presented the staff report. He suggested that staff prepare a Speed Hump
policy for review and discussion by the Commission.
Chairman Guerriero stated he would like to tour the areas where speed humps which
have been implemented in San Diego prior to discussing a proposed policy.
P/'FSMINO2/25/93
-2- 3106193
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEEFING
OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION
HELD APRIL 22, 1993
A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Public/Traffic Safety Commission was called to
order Thursday, April 22, 1993, at 7:00 P.M., Temecula City Hall Main Conference Room,
43174 Business'Park Drive, Temecula, California. The meeting was called to order by
Chairman Ron Guerriero. Commissioner Knopp led the flag salute.
PRESENT: 5 COMMISSIONERS: Johnson, Knopp, Perry, Sander, Guerriero
ABSENT: 1 COMMISSIONERS: Holliday
Also present were Director of Public Works Tim Serlet, Traffic Engineer Ben Dobbins, Fire
Chief Jim Wright, Battalion Chief Mark Browdowski, Officer Mark Legget-t, Temecula Police
Department and Recording Secretary Gall Zigler.
PUBLIC COMMENT
None
COMMISSION BUSINESS
~ 1. Minutes of March 25.1993
It was moved by Commissioner Perry, seconded by Commissioner Johnson to approve
the minutes of March 25, 1993 as mailed.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 5
NOES: O
ABSENT: 1
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
Johnson, Knopp, Perry, Sander, Guerriero
None
Holliday
2. Dial-A-Ride
Joan Ellis, Senior Services Coordinator for Riverside County Service Area 143,
provided an overview of the Murrieta Dial-A-Ride program. Ms. Ellis stated that the
program is designed to improve the quality of life for the disabled by providing
affordable transportation. Ms. Ellis stated that they would like to see the program
coordinated through the City of Temecula as well and the City of Murrieta is asking
that the City of Temecula contribute to the funding of the program.
PTSCOMMIN4/22/93
4126193
PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION APRIL 22.1993
Director of Public Works Tim Serlet advised that the Public/Traffic Safety Commission
was given a presentation by Ed Dool of Temecula Shuttle, on a Dial-A-Ride program
in which the City of Temecula was proposed to subsidize the program. He added that
the City is waiting for the results of a survey taken regarding the need for the service
in Temecula.
It was moved by Chairman Guerriero, seconded by Commissioner Sander that the
Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommend that the City of Temecula support the
existing CSA 143 Handicapped Dial-A-Ride and upon further information of need,
recommend to the City Council some entitlement towards the program being
established.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 5
NOES: 0
ABSENT: I
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
Johnson, Knopp, Perry, Sander, Guerriero
None
Holliday
Trauma Intervention ProQram
Wayne Fortner and Judy Brandt provided an overview of the T.I.P. program and duties
of the T.I.P. volunteers.
Commissioner Perry asked for an accounting of the $10,000 granted by the City of
Temecula.
Mr. Fortner stated that the funds were used for the following:
Program start-up costs
Training program
Printing
Materials
Insurance Policy
Mr. Fortner also stated that T.I.P. asks each participating City to pay a user fee of .15
(fifteen cents) per capita, per year for operations cost. Mr. Fortner advised that a
request for $3,000 from the City of Temecula for FY93 was approved and that the
same request has been made of the City of Murrieta, however there has been no
answer to date.
Commissioner Perry questioned whether the program coordinators have looked into
additional funding through the County Board of Supervisors.
FTSCOMMIN4/22/93
4/26/93
April 27, 1993
TernecUla
SHU rLE
Door Io ~or. Airport Service. Con~mercial. Private
Mayor Sal Munoz
City of Temeeula
43174 Business Park Dr.
Temecula, CA 92590
Re: Dail-A-Ride Proposal (General Public)(Share Ride)
'Dear Sal:
This is a very important, essential proposal and I respectfully ask that it be considered by
counsel.
In our past meetings and conversations I answered your concerns of duplication of service and
the question of funding were answered. I would like to address your further concerns regarding
the public subsidizing a taxi cab type of service. In addition, we have received approval by the
Public/Traffic Safety Commission.
Temecula Shuttle Dial-A-Ride proposal (attached) is not a taxi cab type of service rather a van
share ride type of service as stated in the proposal on page 3 section 4B under System Operation.
Our dispatchers would make every effort possible to schedule passengers together and be able
to stop and pick up other riders traveling in the same direction. Our goal would be an average
of seven to eight passengers per service hour. There would always be share riding in progress
where as a taxi cab service is a private party charter transportation, meaning that only one
person would be picked up and dropped off. As I have stated in our proposal, page 8, section
14 Fares and Transfers, the fare schedule would be determined by the City. There would be
different fare categories. Suggested fares might be as follows:
1)
2)
Regular $3.00
This would be for share ride type of customers, i.e., dispatchers would arrange origin
to destination transportation in a manner designed to accommodate the greatest number
of passengers over the shortest feasible route. When calls are received in the vicinity of
a routed van and capacity permits, the van would pick up additional passengers.
Frail Elderly/Handicapped $1.50
The transportation disabled can be grouped into four categories. They are persons who:
a. Use a wheel chair.
b. Use a mechanical aide such as a brace, crutch or artificial limb.
c. Have visual or hearing impairments.
d. Have mobility problems.
28657 Front Street . Suite A . Temecula. California 92590 . Telephone (714) 695-9999 . FAX (714) 699-4293 . TCP: 7708
Page 2
April 27, 1993
Mayor Sal Munoz
The Frail Elderly, those over 75 years of age and senior citizens between 60-75 with
mobility problems, must be transit disabled to qualify for the rate. Eligibility
requirements should not be set in concrete. Low income groups could be in this
category.
3)
Student & Children $2.00
This rate would be for students and children.
card°
They would have to show Student I.D.
4)
EPS (Express Priority Service) $6.00
This service would be for able body persons requesting immediate pick up.
received less than one hour prior to desired pick up time.)
(Calls
We will also have group fares and transfer rates for the fixed routes.
Our goal is to have a 45-50% fare box revenue. We feel that if we can keep that two car family
using the van share ride, it would save millions of dollars in road improvements, pollution,
improve traffic congestion and accidents. This year there were a reported 142 DUI (Driving
Under the Influence) arrests in Temecula over and above 1991 's figures. Our children and
citizens were put at risk and someone could have been killed. This number could easily have
been reduced if this type of service was available. This share ride proposal is designed to meet
and serve the needs of the citizens of Temecula into the 21st century.
We ask that you support and open discussion in City Hall and have City staff work with us to
answer their comments and concerns that have already been discussed with you.
Respectfully,
Ed Dool
Vice President
ED:dm
cc:
P. Birdsall
R. Parks
R. Roberts
J. Stone
D. Dixon
T. Serlet
May lO, 1993
Temec'Ola
SHUTTLE
Door Io Door. Airport Sen ice. Commercial. Pnvak,
NAYI41tlt
.......... ':E-E~~-'~Tr.,,~N-T-. 2
4.
5.
6.
Mr. Tim Serlett
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Dr.
Temecula, CA 92590
Subject: Temecula Shuttle General Public Dial-A-Ride Proposal
Dear Tim:
This is to address your comments and concerns of the proposal for the general public dial-a-ride
which will be on the council agenda June 8, 1993. We will answer them in order.
A. What is the need? Demand must be documented by a qualified source.
A general public dail-a-ride is not new and is something that was just not "thought up".
Dail-a-ride is part of a family of commuter assistance programs developed and helped
administered by the Riverside Transportation Commission.
Temecula Shuttle has been researching the need for this service for the past eight months
and has come up with qualified sources to back the need. First, there are the major
industrial employees of the city which are mandated by the federal and state laws to
implement share ride and low cost transportation so that their employees will not drive
to work. We have a list of these employees and contact persons that support and state
this will be a vital and essential need.
150 person transit survey.
We have the support and the backing of all the Home Owner's Associations (list and
phone numbers attached).
Backing of all health and hospitals in the area.
Temecula Chief of Police.
Mother's Against Drunk Drivers.
Temecula Chamber of Commerce.
28657 Fron~ Strcc~ . Suite A . Temecula. California 92590 . Telephone 1714~ 695-9999 . FAX ~T141 69~-42~43 . TCP: 7708
7. Temecula Senior Center.
8. Traffic & Safety Commission.
9. All major hotels and resorts.
We are listing three qualified sources that have reviewed and support our proposal. Mr. J.
Kaplan of J. Kaplan & Associates and Mr. Larry W. Wesemann of Barton-Aschman Associates
both are transportation analysts. Mr. Wesemann's comment was this would be a conceived area-
wide transit system that would service a variety of markets in an area that can help relieve traffic
congestion and provide mobility to those in need and give the community a positive image.
Also, Joan Ellis of Service District 143 has offered her personal support.
B. How much would it cost the city?
The proposal is asking the city for $110,000. This would be for two vans at
approximately $45,000 each and $20,000 for start up operating costs (see proposal). As
the proposal states, operator would work with staff to get pilot transit dial-a-ride off and
running at operator's cost.
How much additional staff would city need to implement the service.
From conversations from the City of La Mesa, Mr. John Schmitt (619)463-6611 who is
in charge of La Mesa Dial-A-Ride which is a general public dial-a-ride program and city
is similar in area and population has stated that he has not had to add any staff. He also
would be happy to discuss the program with you. They use an outside contractor for
service.
Mr. Karnes (C.E.O.), San Diego Trans System has visited Temecula and agrees that the
general public dail-a-ride should be implemented and stated that he or Mr. Jerry Kehoe
would be happy to answer your staff and city concerns (619)694-3596.
Also, we are providing information from the League of California Citys, Mr. Dwaln
West (916)444-5190 and a Transit Developrrient Plan from the City of Ridgecrest which
is a city with the same square mileage area approximately 24 miles (age group of 25 to
45 years) and a general public dial-a-ride that has been operational for 5 years. It will
help with staff information.
Are there funds available?
Yes. There are funds available. These are:
2.
3.
4.
T.D.A. funds (Transportation Development Act)
State Transit Assistance Funds
Federal Transit Administration
Urban Transportation Administration
Community Development Block Grant Funds
Measure A Funds
Fair Box Revenue
It should be noted that proposal is based on TDA funding.
The qualified sources mentioned in (C) would be able to answer all questions related to funding.
City staff would apply and qualify for these funds.
E. T~hnical Quali~c. ations:
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
California Corporation in good standing.
License with Public Utilities Commission CTCP7708-P).
License with City of Temecula.
Insured with an admired insurance carrier (filed with PUC) and...
15 years experience in transportation related field as owner/operator.
8 years with Torranee Police Dept. in Traffic & Transportation
18 months as Temecula Shuttle, Airport Shuttle, Van Charter Service, (R.T.S.)
Service, around town shuttle, door to door service.
Certificate of Worker's Compensation Insurance State of Calif. (State Fund)
Member of SPARC Asso~.
References:
a. VIP Coastal Transportation
Mr. Darryl Speach (800)464-0589
b. Lin Lines Transportation
Mr. Dan Johnson (800)952-5068
c. Hexfet America
Linda Amroziak 676-7500
d. Advanced Cardiovascular
Mr. David Olson 694-2400
Why Temecula Shuttle?
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
As the areas leading privately owned transportation provider (TCP 7708).
Knows the wants and needs of the area
Providing door-to-door service in the area for over 18 months
Educated in transportation and transit planning
Employing 15 on-call local drivers
Being a city licensed business and resident
Having the plus of a owner/operator looking out for the city's benefit and being
able to work with the city in an emergency and other transportation needs.
And because I am a Temeculan and in the past have rendered my services many
times (for free) for many of Temecula's needy.
Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce
Homeowner's Association
Alta Vista
..................... · ..................... (909)699-9563
P.O. Box 890143
Temecula, CA 92589-0143
Hill 27
29833 Carnino Del Sol
Temecula, CA 92592
La Serena
P.O. Box 9~,i ............... " ........................ (909)676-2590
Temeeula, CA 92593
Lake Village
P.O. Box 907 ........................................ (909)676-8575
Temecula, CA 92593
Los Ranchitos
....................................... (909)645-5882
P.O. Box 477
Temecula, CA 92593
Meadowview
P.O. Box 788
Temecula, CA 92593
Rancho Meadows
44501 La Paz
Temecula, CA 92592
ITEM 16
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
CITY COUNCIL
FROM:
DAVID F. DIXON, CITY MANAGER
DATE:
JUNE 8, 1993
SUBJECT:
ORDINANCE AMENDING PARK AND RECREATIONAL
FACILITY OPERATIONAL POLICIES AND REGULATIONS -
SMOKING POLICY FOR CITY PARKS AND RECREATION
FACILITIES
PREPARED BY: ~<~
RECOMMENDATION:
SHAWN D. NELSON, COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR
That the City Council introduce and approve the first
reading of the Ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 93-__
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
AMENDING ORDINANCE 91-37 SETTING FORTH PARK AND RECREATIONAL
FACILITY OPERATIONAL POLICIES AND REGULATIONS
DISCUSSION: On April 12, 1993, the Community Services Commission
approved and recommended to the City Coun&il to amend Ordinance No. 91-37 to
require individuals smoking any tobacco products in outdoor City parks, recreation
facilities, and trails to maintain a distance of twenty (20) feet from all non-smokers.
It was further recommended that the Northwest Sports Complex be INCLUDED in this
policy because it is less restrictive than banning smoking completely and compliance
of this policy should not create a negative impact on existing leases associated with
this facility.
The Commission cited that the intent of this smoking policy is to protect the health
and welfare of the citizens of Temecula who utilize city parks, trails, and recreation
facilities from the negative affects of secondary smoke.
In addition to requiring smokers to maintain a twenty (20) feet cushion to all non-
smokers, the Commission also recommended that smoking. be prohibited within
twenty (20) feet of the following outdoor park areas:
Public events including but not limited to sports events, entertainment,
speaking performances, ceremonies, pageants, and fairs where people
congregate.
2. Seating in dugouts and bleacher areas.
Within enclosed outdoor areas where air circulation may be impeded by
architectural, landscaping, or other barriers such as amphitheaters and
swimming pool areas.
4. Any place where food and/or drink is offered for sale.
5. Children's playground areas.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
ORDINANCE NO. 93-_
AN ORDINANCE OF TItE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA AMY~NDING ORDINANCE 91-37 SETTING
FORTH PARK AND RECREATIONAL FACILITY
OPERATIONAL POLICIES AND REGULATIONS
WITF. REAS, The City Council of the City of Temecula has authority over the public
parks and recreational facilities within the jurisdiction of the City of Temecula; and
WHEREAS, The Community Services Commission of the City of Temecula has
recommended that the City Council adopt regulations which would provide limitations for
smoking in outdoor City Parks and Recreational Facilities; and
WHEREAS, The City Council of the City of Temecula fmds the smoking of tobacco and
any other weed or plant is a positive danger of health and a material annoyance, inconvenience,
discomfort and a health hazard to those who are present in confined spaces or in close proximity
to the source of said smoke, and in order to serve public health, safety and welfare, the declared
purpose of this ordinance is to protect nonsmokers to the maximum extent possible, particularly
children, from secondhand smoke in all places stated and required in this ordinance.
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. General Policy: is hereby amended to add the following subsections:
Q. Smoking Policy: It is the intent of this policy to protect the health and
welfare of the citizens of Temecula who utilize city parks, trails, and recreation facilities from
the negative affects of secondary smoke. Therefore, individuals who choose to smoke in outdoor
park areas shah maintain at all times a twenty (20) foot distance from all non smokers.
Further, smoking shall be prohibited within twenty (20) feet of the following outdoor park areas:
Public events including but not limited to sports events, entertainment,
speaking performances, ceremonies, pageants, and fairs where people
congregate.
2. Seating in dugouts and bleacher areas.
Within enclosed outdoor areas where air circulation may be impeded by
architectural, landscaping, or other barriers such as amphitheaters and
swimming pool areas.
4. Any place where food and/or drink is offered for sale.
5. Children's playground areas.
Section 2. Penalties: Violation of any provision or failure to comply with any
requirement of this ordinance is an infraction.
ORDINANCE NO. 91-37
AN ORDINANCE OF T!tP. CITY COUNCIL OF TI:iY. CITY OF
TEMECULA ADOPTING PARK AND RECREATIONAL FACII.ITY
OPERATIONAL POLICIF..~ AND REGUIATIONS
WFrF. REAS, The City Council of the City of Temecula has authority Over the
public parks and recreational facilities within the jurisdiction boundaries of the City of
Temecula; and
WBEREAS, The Board of Directors may adopt regulations binding upon all
persons governing the use of City parks and recreational facilities and property, and may deem
a violation of any such 'regulation and misdemeanor.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEM2ECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN
AS FOLLOW:
SECTION 1. General Policy:
A. Equal Opportunity: Any and all individuals shall be provided equal
opportunity for use of any recreational facility and any recreational program without regard to
physical limitation, age, race, color, national origin, religion, political beliefs or sex.
B. Reserved Use: Reserved use (defined as exclusive, permitted use for one
or more occasions) of community, neighborhood and other recreational facilities shall require
obtaining a "Use Permit" in a form established by the City of Temecula Community Services
District (TCSD). The TCSD may establish use fees by Resolution.
C. Community Park (Unreserved) Use: Use of all community park facilities
(defined as a site that serves the City's residential areas) will be based on first come first serve
basis. No "Use Permit" is required for this purpose. If a user group wishes to resen, e the use
of a community park facility, a "Use Permit" shall be required, with all applicable fees, rules,
regulations, terms and conditions enforced.
D. Multiple Facility Reservatiohs: If more than one recreational facility is
reserved (e.g. two sports fields), applicable fees and deposits shall be charged for each facility
reserved.
E.- Sponsored Uses: Any use of recreational facilities scheduled for TCSD
sponsored or co-sponsored uses shall be deemed a use for TCSD purposes, and shall be exempt
from fees, deposits and permit requirements listed heroin. Such determination shall be made by
the Director of Community Services.
5/Ord$91-37
-1-
F. User Groups: User groups are established and defined as follows to
categorize groups using certain recreational facilities. User groups designations form the basis
for variable fee schedules for certain recreational facilities as provided elsewhere herein.
Group 1 - TCSD-sponsored or co-sponsored leisure and
recreational activities.
Group II - Youth groups conducting non-profit youth oriented
sports activities, and non-profit athletic/civic organizations conducting community oriented
leisure or sports activities.
Group III - Base standard rate for community users on a non-
profit basis.
Group IV Profit making, commercial businesses or non-resident
organizations conducting activities that are for profit and are either open or closed to the public.
G. Recurring Use: Recurring use is generally defined as uses of recreational
facilities on a regularly scheduled basis for more than one occasion (i.e. leagues, etc.)
H. Nonrecurring Use: Nonrecurring use is generally defined as uses of
recreational facilities on a one time only or special event basis (i.e., annual picnic, parties or
company sponsored events). A fee and permit is required only when reserved use by an
organization is requested.
I. Exemption: Due to special or unusual circumstances, the Parks and
Recreation Commission may exempt user groups II, III and IV from fees for the use of
recreational facilities. It is the responsibility of the specific user group to formally request
exemption from the Parks and Recreation Commission. The request should stipulate the special
or unusual circumstances that necessitate exemption.
J. Scheduling Priorities: Scheduling priorities shall be by user groups as
indicated previously with Group I having precedence over II, Group II over III, etc. In the
event of conflict, the Director of Community Services ("Director") reserves the right to schedule
any group. Scheduling of reserved uses will be carried out by the Director or his/her designee
in a fair and equitable manner, to serve the leisure and recreation needs of the citizens of the
Temecula Community Services District.
K. Sports Field and Facility: It is recognized that recreational facilities and
sports fields vary in type and location. However, fee schedules shall generally apply equally
to all sports fields and facilities depending on the level of service required for an individual
facility.
L. Fee Payment: The fees applicable to the use of facilities are due and
payable at the City of Temecula offices 72 hours prior to the use of that facility. Charges
assessed for damages and grounds cleanup shall include only City's actual cost and are due and
payable upon demand to the user. When fees are due and payable at the time a permit is issued,
5/Ords91-37
°2-
refunds are permitted if sufficient notice is given to the City upon cancellation with five (5)
working days notice for nonrecurring groups.
M. Sales and Uses: Authorized user groups, as described herein, which desire
to use facilities for fund-raising purposes shall be allowed to do so subject to policies and fees
contained herein. Food concessionaires and other uses which are determined by the TCSD to
be solely a commercial undertaking, and without educational, recreational or cultural benefit to
the community, shall be selected pursuant to City public bidding procedures.
N. Inclement Weather: Inclement weather is generally defined as weather
which, in the judgement of the Director, has left recreational facilities in a condition which, if
the facilities are used, presents a risk of damage to facilities or injury to users.
The Director shall have the authority to deny use of all or any portion of
a facility to a user based on inclement weather. The Director reserves the exclusive right to
determine that a use of TCSD facilities is precluded by inclement weather, and no refund of fees
shall be made on grounds of bad weather or field condition unless the Director makes such
determination.
O. Denial of Facility Use: The TCSD shall have the authority based on cause
to deny use of all or any portion of a facility to any group or individual 'who has abused the
privilege of facility use as included in but not limited to these general policies and general rules
governing the use of community and neighborhood park.
P. Liability Insurance: All user groups conducting reserved sporting or
special event activities, that will attract fifty (50) or more patrons (i.e. tournaments, clinics,
fairs, festivals concerts, performances, camps, etc.) will be required to provide the Director with
a certificate of insurance in the amount of one million dollars ($1,000,000.00) naming the City
of Temecula and the TCSD as additionally insured.
SECTION 2. Parks & Recreation Facilities Regulations:
DeFinitions: The following words shall have the meaning indicated when used in these
regulations:
A. "Park" means any community park, neighborhood park, or any other
recreational facility maintained by the City of Temecula.
B.- "Board" means the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community
Services District, or any other person authorized by the Board, pursuant to law, to act in its
stead.
of Temecula.
"Commission" means the Parks and Recreation Commission for the City
5/Ordsgl-37
-1-
D. "Amplified sound" means music, sound wave, vibration, or speech
projected or transmitted by electronic equipment, including amplifiers.
E. "Knife or dagger" means any knife, or dagger having a blade of three
inches or more in length; any ice pick or similar sharp stabbing tool; any straight-edge razor
blade fitted to a handle.
F. "Vehicle" means any device by which any person or property may be
propelled, moved, or drawn, excepting a device moved by human power.
G. "Vehicular travel" means travel by a vehicle.
SECTION 3. Duty to Comply: No person shall enter, be, or remain in any park unless
he complies at all times with all of the City ordinances and regulations applicable to such park
and with all other applicable laws, ordinances, rules and regulations.
SECTION 4. Rules and Regulations Applicable in City Parks: The following rules and
regulations apply in all City parks unless expressly stated otherwise elsewhere in these
regulations.
SECTION 5. Operation of Vehicles:
A. Roads for Public Use: The provisions of the California Vehicle Code are
applicable in the City parks upon any way or place of whatever nature which is publicly
maintained and open to the use of the public for purposes of vehicular travel. All violations of
said Vehicle Code shall be enforced and prosecuted in accordance with the provisions thereof.
B. Surfaces Other than Roads for Public Use: Skateboards: No person shall
drive or otherwise operate a vehicle in a park upon surfaces other than those maintained and
open to the public for purposes of vehicular travel, except upon temporary parking areas as may
be designated from time to time by the Commission, and further excepting vehicles in the
service of the City, animal control vehicles, law enforcement vehicles, and motorized
wheelchairs. No person shall ride or operate a skateboard in any park, except in designated
SECTION 6. Solicitation Prohibited: No person shall practice, carry on, conduct or
solicit for any occupation, business, or profession in any City park, or sell or offer for sale any
food, beverage, merchandise, article, or anything whatsoever in any City park. This section
shall not apply to any person acting pursuant to a contract with the City of Temecula or the
Temecula Community Services District, or under a permit granted by the Commission.
SECTION..7. Prohibition of Animals in Park: No person shall cause, permit, or allow
any animal owned or possessed by him, or any animal in his care, custody, or control to be
present in any City park except:
5/Ordsgl-37
(A) Equine animals being led or ridden under reasonable control upon any
bridle paths or trails provided for such purposes.
(B) Equine or other' animals which are hitched or fastened at a place expressly
designated for such purpose.
(C) Dogs or cats when led by a cord or chain not more than six (6) feet long,
or when confined within the interior of a vehicle.
(D) Dogs which have been specially trained and are being used by blind or
disabled persons to aid and guide them in their movements.
CE) Small pets which are kept on the person of the possessor at all times.
(F) In connection with activities authorized in writing by the Commission.
(G) Fowls or animals turned loose at the direction of the Commission.
SECTION 8. Duty to Care for Animals: It shall be the mandatory duty of all persons
owning, possessing, in control of, or otherwise responsible for a dog, cat, or an equine animal
in a park to promptly collect, pick up; and remove all fecal matter left behind by said animal
in or upon any park; provided, however, that this subsection shall not apply to guide dogs for
blind or disabled persons or to equine animals on bridle paths.
SECTION 9. Amplified Sound in Parks:
(A) Purpose: The City Council enacts this legislation for the sole purpose of
securing and promoting the public health, comfort, safety, and welfare of its citizenry. While
recognizing that certain uses of sound amplifying equipment are protected by constitutional rights
of free speech and assembly, the City Council nevertheless feels obligated to reasonably regulate
the use of sound amplifying equipment in order to protect the correlative constitutional rights
of the citizens of this community to privacy and freedom from the public nuisance of loud and
unnecessary sound.
(B) Permit Required for Amplihers: It shall be unlawful for any person to
install, use, and operate within a park a loudspeaker or any sound amplifying equipment for the
purposes of giving instruction, directions, talks, addresses, or lectures, or of transmitting music
to any persons or groups of persons in any park, or in the vicinity thereof, except when
installed, used, or operated in compliance with one of the following provisions:
1. By authorized law enforcement or park and recreation personnel
or
2. Under a reservation or permit issued by the Director, and when
operated in accordance with terms of said reservation or permit.
5/Onh91-37
-5-
(C) Granting and Denial of Permit: In determining whether to grant or deny
a permit, the Director shall be guided by the following considerations:
including the applicant;
The constitutional free speech and assembly fights of all persons,
persons in the park;
The possible effects upon the peaceable passage or presence of
3. The potential for disorder or unlawful injury to persons or property;
4. The potential invasion of others persons' rights of privacy;
5. The possible unlawful breach or disturbance of the peace; and
6. Any actual conflict with other scheduled park uses or events.
The Director shall not deny a pdrmit on the basis of any dislike for or disagreement with
the content of any proposed talks, addresses, lectures, or musical presentations. The Director
may, however, deny a permit for any such events which are designed for the purpose of
advocating imminent lawless conduct.
(D) Power Source for Amplifiers: Amplifiers permitted in parks shall be
operated only through a power source provided by the City, a battery, or a generator.
SECTION 10. Prohibition of Firearms, Fireworks. and Toy Weapons: No person
shall carry or discharge firearms, firecrackers, rockets, torpedoes, or other types of explosives,
or carry or discharge any gun, or pistol, or any sling shot or similar device, or any bows and
arrows, or any other object capable of propelling a projectile, or carry or use any object
calculated to make a noise sufficient to disturb the peace or quiet of the park, or bring into any
park any of the above objects or articles. Fireworks may be permitted for special events only
with formal approval from the Parks and Recreation Commission and the Fire Department.
SECTION 11. Prohibition of Dangerous Weapons: The provisions of the
California Dangerous Weapons' Control Law are applicable in City parks and shall be enforced
and prosecuted in accordance with the provisions thereof. No person shall carry on his person,
in plain view, any knife with a blade in access of 3 inches. Dagger are strictly prohibited.
SECTION 12. Exceptions to Applicability: The provisions of Section 10 shall not
be deemed to prohibit the carrying of ordinary tools or equipment for use in a lawful occupation
or for the purpose of lawful recreation.
SECTION 13. Damaging Property.: No person shall cut, break, injure, deface,
or disturb any tree, shrub, plant, rock, building, cage, pen, monument, fence, bench, or other
5/0 rds9 1-3 7
structure, apparatus, or property, or pluck, pull up, cut, take, or remove any shrub, bush, plant,
or flower, or mark or write upon, paint, or deface in any manner any building, monument,
fence, bench, or other structure.
SECTION 14. Damaging Land: No person shall cut, dig, or remove any wood,
tuff, grass, soil, rock, sand, gravel, or fertilizer, except park maintenance personnel.
SECTION 15. Golf: No person shall play or practice the game of golf, including
chipping, putting, driving or any other type of play or practice which includes the hitting of golf
or similar type ball with a golf or similar type club.
SECTION 16. Water; No person shall swim, fish in, bathe, wade in, release pet
animals in, or pollute the water of any fountain, pond, lake, stream, or reservoir except by
permission of the Commission.
SECTION 17. Fires and Fireplaces: No person shall 'kindle a fire except in
fireplaces provided for that purpose or in barbecues approved by the Commission, except by
permission of the Director.
SECTION 18. Waste Liquids and Refuse: No person shall wash dishes, or empty
salt water or other waste liquids, or leave garbage, cans, bottles, papers, or other refuse
anywhere other than in the receptacles provided therefor.
SECTION 19. Loitering at Night: No person shall be or remain in any City park
between the hours of eleven (11:00) o'clock p.m. and six (6:00) o'clock a.m. of the following
day without permission of the Director. The provisions of Section 9 (c) shall govern the
granting or denial of such permission.
SECTION 20. Meetings: No person shall hold any meeting, service, sporting
event, concert, exercise, parade or exhibition in any public park without first obtaining a permit
from the Director. The provisions of Section 9 (c) shall govern the issuance or denial of a
permit under this Section.
SECTION 21. Alcoholic Beverages: No person shall consume any alcoholic
beverage within any park, unless formally approvdd by the Parks and Recreation Commission.
SECTION 22. Controlled Substances: The provisions of the California Uniform
Controlled Substances Act are applicable in district parks and shall be enforced and prosecuted
in accordance with the provisions thereof.
SECTION 23.
City parks.
Glass Containers: No person shall possess any glass container in
5lOrd.,9 1-37
-7-
SECTION 24. Flying Balloons or Planes: No person shall use any City park as
a primary launch site for hot air balloons unless formally approved by the Park and Recreation
Commission. Motorized airplanes, and gliders are prohibited on City park site.
SECTION 25. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause
the same to be posted in the manner prescribed by law.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTFI} this 8th day of October, 1991.
ATTEST:
~une S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
Ronald J./~/k/2, Mayor
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA)
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Ordinance 91-37 was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular
meeting of the City Council on the 241h day of September, 1991, and that thereafter, said
Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 8th day
of October, 1991, by the following roll call vote.
AYES: 4
COUNCILMEMBERS: Moore, Lindemans, Munoz, Birdsall
NOES: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 1
COUNCILMEMBERS: Parks
~u~June S. Greek, City Clerk
5/Ords91-37
ITEM 17
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
CITY COUNCIL
FROM:
DAVID F. DIXON, CITY MANAGER
DATE:
JUNE 8, 1993
SUBJECT:
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB PROJECT
PREPARED BY: ~z
RECOMMENDATION:
SHAWN D. NELSON, COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR
MARY JANE MCLARNEY, FINANCE OFFICER
That the Board of Directors:
Approve loan agreement of $374,846 with the Boys and Girls Club for construction
of the Boys and Girls Club Facility.
DISCUSSION: On April 13, 1993, the City Council approved funding in the
amount of $374,846 for the Boys and Girls Club Project. However, the Council also
directed staff to prepare a loan agreement with the Boys and Girls Club that identifies
the terms of the loan repayment and provides a provision for the City to assume the
lease of the property with the Temecula Town Association if the Boys and Girls Club
defaults on the loan. Also, the Council directed staff to analyze the feasibility of the
Play and Learn School (PALS) program utilizing the facility during the morning hours
when the Boys and Girls Club is not operating..
Staff has prepared a loan agreement with the Boys and Girls Club that stipulates the
monthly payment of the loan at $3,078 per month for fifteen (15) years, Pursuant
to the attached loan agreement, the Boys and Girls Club would receive a maximum
of a 100% credit towards the monthly loan payments through service programming
hours of $1.05 per child per hour for the first twelve (12) months. Beginning with
month thirteen (13) through the remainder of the loan term, the Boys and Girls Club
would receive a maximum of a 50% credit towards the monthly loan payment through
service programming hours and the balance be repaid in a cash payment. Therefore,'
the Boys and Girls Club would begin to pay $1,539 per month beginning with month
thirteen (13) through the balance of the loan term.
Also, language has been included in the loan agreement that if the Boys and Girls Club
defaults on the loan payments, the City would be allowed to assume the lease terms
for the property.
Finally, staff has met with representatives of the Boys and Girls Club, PALS, and the
Department of Social Services, Community Care Licensing. As a result of these
meetings, the only modification required in the existing design of the Boys and Girls
Club facility to accommodate the PALS program would be to add perimeter fencing
along the back portion of the building with irrigation and grass improvements. PALS
is willing to pay the City $500 per month for using this facility. It is stipulated in the
loan agreement that the Boys and Girls Club sub-lease the facility to the City from
Monday through Friday from 7:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. The City, in turn, would lease
the facility to the PALS program. The lease with PALS and the financial terms would
be a separate agreement between PALS and the City of Temecula.
Staff has received a request from the Boys and Girls Club related to the loan
repayment terms and the PALS program. The Boys and Girls Club would like to
receive a 100% credit towards the monthly loan payment to the City through service
programming hours for the balance of the loan. Also, the Boys and Girls Club would
like to discuss the PALS program as a separate item and not be included with this loan
agreement.
Attached is a copy of the loan agreement with the Boys and Girls Club for your
review.
FISCAL IMPACT: Total loan amount is $374,846 for fifteen (15) years. This
amount includes all previously approved loans. The monthly payment is $3,078. The
loan would be repaid by the Boys and Girls Club receiving a maximum credit of 100%
of the monthly payment in service programming hours at $1.05 per hour per child for
the first twelve (12) months. Beginning with month thirteen (13) through the
remainder of the loan term, the Boys and Girls Club would receive a maximum credit
of 50% of the monthly loan payment for service programming hours and the balance
would be paid in cash.
A separate lease agreement with PALS and the City of Temecula will be executed at
a later date. PALS has agreed to pay $500 per month for this lease.
MAY 28 '93 14:4:3 TO cJScJ 694 6488 FROM Temecula Ualle~ Opt. T-975 P. 01
Fax Transmittal Memo
May 29, 1993
Mr. Shawn Nelson
Community Service Director
City of Temecula
4317 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California 92590
Dear Shawn:
The Board of Directors of the Boys and Girls Club of Temecula wishes
to request that the City Council approve the terms as originally
proposed in the loan request to the city dated Oanuary 12, 1993,
We, additionally, wish to request that the issue regarding usage of
the Boys & Girls Club of Temecula facility by Play & Learn SchoD1 be
considered as a separate item.
Sincerely,
Alan M. Winkelstein, O.D.
27475 Yen Road. f232
Temecu~. CA 92591
(909) 699~152e
OffN:erm
Aim Vtnkelelein
Pnes/~ejff
CaMe Aftida
V~oe/=reNdeat
Den Meguic
Je~ Miley
Frank Caecja~i
Jeck Femandez
Terry Giinmre
Oavid Le Pmrde
Jim Le Rue
Jeairm Overson
Jkn Peltingill
Alicia Rmnirez
John ~-mL~ro
Jim Steed
Joan Wehiig
Claudle Walker
MAY-28-93 FRI ]0:52 BgS OOSTA I1ESA .. FAX NO. 7147555648 P, 02
LOAN FUNDS
FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES
· emecula, California
June 8, 1993
Name of Borrower/
Grantee:
Amount Borrowed:
Interest Rate:
Summary of Terms:
Boys and Girls Club of Temecula, Inc., a
California non-profit corporation
("CLUB")
$374,846.00
Variable interest based on the average
Local Agency InVeStment Fund ("LAIF,,)
rate for the Previous six (6) months;
loan to be repaid as set forth in this
Agreement; city to provide statement of
current balance July 1, 1993, and every
six (6) months thereafter until debt
fully repaid.
Recitals:
W~EREAS, the CLUB desires to have a Permanent facility
located in Temecula for the benefit of the youth of the
City; and,
WHEREAS, the United Way of the Inland Valley,s Needs
Assessment reflects that very few non-profit organizations
provide services to youth in Temecula: and,
WHEREAS, twenty-seven percent (27%) of the City's
PoPulation constitute youth; and,
WHEREAS, the United Way's Needs Assessment concluded
that youth in the City were at-risk due to lack of
programming; and,
T030540.AGR
5128198 --1--
.MAy728-83 FRI ]0:52 BWS OOSTA..Y~.A ........ FAX NO. 7147555648 P. 03
WHEREAS, by providing programming early on, the Cit
and, ted problems, delxnquency, teen pregnancy, and crime;
WHERBAS, City has previously supported the youth and
child care services of the Boys and Girls Club by a loan of
thirty-one-thousand dollars ($31,000.00) to acquire the
modular building; and,
WHEREAS, the previous loan's repayment obligation,
secured by a UCC-1 Financing statement, is to be
consolidated with the loan funds Provided herein; and,
WHEREAS, City advanced funds for the project in the
amount of Twenty-thousand dollars ($20,000.00) which is
secured by a separate promissory note; and,
WHEREAS, the provision of the loan which is the subject
of this Agreement will ensure that area youth are served in
the future.
Agreement:
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises
and covenants contained herein, and for other good and
valuable consideration the receipt and sufficiency of which
are hereby acknowledged, City and CLUB agree as follows:
I. Loan Agreement Provision.
A. CLUB shall undertake to provide youth services in
the City of Temecula.
B. In consideration of the services to be performed
by CLUB for City, as set forth in'Paragraph A hereof, City
hereby lends to CLUB the sum of Three-hundred-seventy-four-
thousand-eight-hundred-£orty-six dollars ($374,846.00), to
be repaid as follows:
CLUB promises to pay to the order of the City
of Temecula, California, at 43174 Business
Park Drive, Temecula, California 9~590, the
principal sum of Three-hundred-seventy-four-
thousand-eight-hundred-forty-six dollars
I~OHO.NI
5/2a1~
-2-
.... II,qY-28-93 FRI 10:53 Bi,]S OOS.' _.I:I..ESB ................_7!47555648 P, 04
512a,~93
($374,846.00) with simple interest based on
the unpaid balance of that principal sum
until paid.
Repayment of the principal and interest is to
commence once the facility is dedicated and
open for operation. City agrees to accept as
payment on a monthly basis during the first
year of the repayment the provision by CLUB
of in-kind services to be provided by CLUB to
youth in the City of Temecula. During the
second and subsequent years of repayment,
CLUB shall make its payments fifty percent
(50%) An cash and fifty percent (50%) in-kind
services. The loan is to be fully amortized
over the life of the loan.
(a)
(b)
CLUB shall provide programming to youth
based on a rate of one dollar and five
cents ($1.05) per child per hour.
Repayment shall be fully amortized over
a fifteen (15) year period with an
estimated interest rate of five percent
(5%) with the actual interest rate based
on the City's return from the LAIF for a
monthly in-kind payment of Three-
thousand-seventy-eight dollars and
thirty cents ($3,078.30) during the
first year of repayment and for the
second and subsequent years, fifty
percent (50%) of the repayment shall be
in cash and fifty percent (50%) in-kind
services.
(C)
Based on subparagraph (b) above, CLUB
would be obligated to provide Two-
thousand-n~ne-hundred-thirty-two (2,932)
youth service hours per month during the
first year of repayment based on an
average of thirty seven (37) youths
receiving four (4) hours of programming
per day and during the second and
subsequent years, CLUB shall provide
One-thousand-four-hundred-sixty_six
(1,466) youth service hours per month
-3-
JIJN- 1-93 TOE 8:52 B~S OOSTA HESA F~ NO, 7147555648
P. 02
based on an average of seventeen and
one-half (17.5) youths receiving four
(4) hours of programming per day for the
fifty percent (50%) in-kind service
hours payment.
(d)
CLUB shall provide City reporting of
attendance to verify in-kind payments in
a form and manner acceptable to City's
Director of Finance.
The interest rate Provided in this Agreement
is variable. Interest shall be simple
interest based on the date of disbursements
to the CLUB and every six (6) months after
disbursement until the entire balance is
repaid· City shall calculate the interest
rate based on the Previous six (6) month
period· By way of example, the interest rate
for the July 1, 1993 to December 31, 1993
installment payment will be based upon the
LAIF interest rate for the July 1, 1993 to
December 31, 1993 period. In like fashion,
City will adjust the interest rate semi-
annually.
Each payment, when made, shall be credited
first to the interest then due and the
remainder shall be credited to principal.
Interest shall thereupon cease to accrue upon
the Principal so credited·
c. CLUB agrees that City may assign to the
Redevelopmerit Agency of the City of Temecula all its right,
title and interest in this Agreement at any time during the
term of this Agreement.
D. CLUB agrees that City shall have the right to take
a security interest in the facility and lease agreement
sufficient to protect Cityss loan and to ensure that the
first priority shall be given to ensuring that services be
provided to youth under this Agreement will continue to be
provided in the event CLUB is in default of or unable or
unwilling to provide such services in accordance with the
Provisions of this Agreement.
1030540.AC, R
5128193 -4 -
..... M. AY728-93 FRI 10:_5_4. BWS COST. A_ ...M~F:~__a ............-F..A.X..NO_'... 7!..47555848P. 06
E. CLUB agrees that if the three (3) or more in-kind,
cash, or combined payments are not made to City when due,
that the entire balance due on the loan, principal and
interest, shall then be due and owing to the City. Such
acceleration of the debt herein is in addition to, at City's
option, of foreclosure on City's security interest.
F. CLUB may at any time make cash payments to city in
lieu of or in addition to in-kind payments and may pre-pay
the balance of the loan at any time without penalty.
I1. Consolidation of Existing Loans/New Loan Amount.
A. The new loan granted herein shall consolidate two
existing loans and provide additional funds as set out
herein. Nothing herein shall, in any way operate to lessen,
defeat, annul, or terminate City's rights, interests,
security, or security interest under any existing loans
between the parties hereto.
B. There exists a loan between City and CLUB
consisting of a Promissory Note dated March 13, 1991, a
Financing Statement ("UCC-I,,) dated November 5, 1991, and
Security Agreement dated November 5, 1991. The total debt
contained in said documents is Thirty-one-thousand dollars
($31,000.00).
C. There exists a loan between City and CLUB
evidenced by a Promissory Note dated January 26, 1993, in
the amount of Twenty-thousand dollars ($20,000.00) for
architectural work and the preparation of bid documents.
D. Pursuant to this Agreement, City shall loan to
CLUB an additional sum of Three-hundred-twenty-three,
thousand-eight-hundred-forty-six dollars ($323,846) pursuant
to the provisions of Section III hereof.
The total debt consolidated and contained herein
;T;; 7 ,;_....:.,_
IlI. Loan Di.~burqemen..tS.
A. Prior to receiving any distribution hereunder,
CLUB shall submit to City,s Director of Finance, a line-item
budget for approval. CLUB shall also submit to City for
1030540,AOR '5--
II,qY-28:93 FP, I ]0:55 BUS .O.OST. R HER ....F/tX NO. 7147555648
P. 07
approval all contracts which contracts shall provide that
they are not valid unless and until the same are aPproved by
City.
B. Prior to receiving the second disbursement hereof,
CLUB shall submit to the City Attorney for approval of its
ground lease with the Temeoula Town Association. The City
Attorney shall review such lease to ensure that the lease
will enable the City to occupy and use the real property
subject to the lease in the event CLUB defaults in its
performance under this Agreement or City forecloses upon its
security interest therein. The second and all subsequent
disbursements shall be withheld until the city Attorney
authorizes such based upon the adequacy of the ground lease
Provisions.
C. Prior to each distribution as set forth below,
CLUB shall submit to City,s Director Of Finance all invoices
supporting that distribution. Each invoice shall be signed
as to approval by the CLUB's Director prior to submittal to
City.
D. CLUB shall at all times comply with all State and
local laws pertaining to the division or parcelation of real
property. CLUB shall be responsible for the payment of all
fees associated with any applications necessary to approve
any division of land. However, such costs may be added to
the loan amount granted hereunder.
E. Disbursement of loan proceeds shall be made after
each threshold set forth below:
1st Installment - For Permit Fees and
Grading.
2nd Installment - Following completion of the
Foundation and Site Preparation.
3rd Installment - Following Relocation and
Installation of Building on Site.
4th Installment - Following issuance by City
of the Certificate of Occupancy.
'a~o54o. Ac.n -6-
5128193
M~Y-28:93 FRI ]0:55 BWS COST~ MESh F~X NO. 714.7555648 P. 08
Sublease of Facility0
A. As a materlal, integral part of CLUB's
consideration offered to City in approving this transaction,
CLUB agrees to sublease the facility to City at no charge on
Mondays through Fridays between the hours of 7:00 a.m. to
1:00 p.m. for the term of this loan.
B. CLUB agrees that City may further sublease its
lease with CLUB subject to the reasonable approval of CLUB
which such approval shall not be unreasonably withheld.
City shall only be authorized to sublease its interest to
public, charitable, or educational organizations--IncludIng
non-profit corporations whose activity and use of the '
facility will complement the primary use of the facility by
CLUB o
c. CLUB further agrees that City shall have the right
to retain one-hundred percent (100%) of any rents, profits,
or proceeds received from a sublease and that such rents,
profits, or proceeds shall not be applied to any rent,
profit, payment, etc. due and owing from CLUB to City.
D. In the event that City subleases the facility as
provided herein, city shall insure that such sublease
contains appropriate indemnity and insurance provisions to
protect CLUB and the facility from any loss, cost, or
expense resulting from City's sublease of the facility.
V. General ProYisions.
A. Any notices to be given hereunder may be effected
either by personal delivery or by mail. Mailed notices
shall be addressed to the address of the parties to be
notified which appears below, but each party may change its
address by written notice given in accordance with this
paragraph. Notices delivered personally will be deemed
communicated as of actual receipt. Mailed notices will be
deemed communicated and received as of five (5) calendar
days following the date of mailing the notice.
City:
City of Temecula
Attn: Finance Department
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California 92590
10~O,540.AGR
51~8193
-7-
....... I1.R_Y-28-93 FR] i0!.56 BUS COSTA IIESf FAX N0. 7147555648
P, 09
CLUB:
Boys and Girls Club of Temecula Valley, Inc.
27475 Ynez Road, #234
Temecula, California 92590
B. In addition to the in-kind services reporting
required by paragraph I.B.2 hereof, CLUB shall prepare and
submit to the City Manager, or his/her designee, a quarterly
written report specifying the activities of CLUB during the
preceding quarter, which report shall also contain a
financial statement for CLUB certified by an officer of the
C. CLUB agrees that it will indemnify, protect,
defend, and hold City and its elected officials, officers,
employees, and agents, free and harmless from all claims for
r those of the CLUB,s officers, employees,
agents, or invitees in connection with the services rendered
hereunder to the maximum extent allowed by law.
D. CLUB shall secure from a good and responsible
company or companies authorized and admitted to do insurance
business in the State of California, pay for, and maintain
in full force and effect for the duration of this Agreement,
a policy of comprehensive automobile and workers'
compensation and employees. liability insurance in which
City is covered as an insureds with the CLUB and shall
furnish a Certificate of Liability Insurance to the City
Manager before execution of this Agreement with the City.
Notwithstanding any inconsistent statement in the policy or
any subsequent endorsement attached thereto, the protection
by the policy shall=
Include the City as a covered insureds
covering the services to be performed under
this Agreement, whether liability is
attributable to the CLUB or the City.
Include the City, its officers, employees,
and agents while acting within the scope of
their duties to be performed under this
Agreement against all claims arising out of,
or in connection with the Agreement.
1030540.AGI!
5128183
-8-
...... _11_~y_-..28-.93 O.:.S7 ............FaX :o....7.!47Ssse4aP.
3. Provide the following minimum limits:
(a) General Liability: $1,000,000 combined
single limit per occurrence for bodily
injury, personal injury, and property damage.
(b) Workers' Compensation and Employers
Liability: Worker,s Compensation limits as
required by the Labor Code of the State of
California and Employers, Liability limits of
$1,000,000 per accident.
The insurer shall agree to waive all rights
of subrogation against the City, its
officers, officials, employees, agents, and
volunteers for losses arising from the acts
or omissions of CLUB.
Bear an endorsement or shall have attached a
rider whereby it is provided that, in the
event of expiration or proposed cancellation
of such policy for any reason whatsoever, the
City shall be notified by registered mail,
postage prepaid, return receipt requested,
not less than thirty (30) days before
expiration or cancellation is effective.
Any deductible or self-insured retention must
be declared to and approved by the City. At
the option of the City, either the insurer
shall reduce or eliminate such deductible or
self-insured retention as respects the City,
its officers, officials, employees, and
agents; or the CLUB shall procure a bond
guaranteeing payment of losses and related
investigations, claim administration, and
defense expenses.
E. CLUB agrees that if any legal action is necessary
to enforce or collect amounts due under this Agreement, the
prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys'
fees in addition to any other relief to which that party may
be entitled. This provision shall be applicable to the
entire Agreement.
t o3o~o. AGa - 9 -
512819~
MAY-28-93 FRI ]0:57 BWS COSTA HF_SA FAX NO. 7]47555648
P. 11
F. Prior to the execution of this Agreement, CLUB
shall provide proof, satisfactory to the City Manager and
City Attorney, of its status as a valid non-profit
corporation in accordance with Section 501(c)(3) of the
Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C.S. Sec. 501(0)(3)).
G. The term of this Agreement shall be from
June S, 1993, until the CLUB repays the loan to the City.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this
Agreement to be signed by its officers duly authorized to do
cr.~:
BOYS AND GIRLS CIJJB OF
TEMECULA VALLEY, INC.
Name'.-
Title.'
Name:
Title:
CITY OF TEMECULA:
ATTEST:
J. SKLMUNOZ, MAYOR
JUNE S. GREEK, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
~COTT F. FIELD, CITY ATTORNEY
1030540. NIR
~12Sl93
-10-
JUN- 1-93 TUE 8:53 BWS OOSTA MESA FA× NO. 7147555848 P. 03
PROMISSoRy
]%.MO~: $323,846.00
Temecula, California
Date
FOR VALUE RECEIVED, on or before
[date] the undersigned individuals on behalf of the Boys and
Clrls Club of Temecula Valley, Inc., promises to pay the City of
Temecula, a California general law munlcipal corporation, or
order at 43174 Business Park Drive, TemeCula, California 92590,
or at such other place as the holder hereof may from time to time
designate in writing, the principal sum of three-hundred-twenty_
three-thousand-eight-hundred-forty_six dollars ($323,846.00),
with interest thereon after said date estimated at five percent
(5%) per annum, but which actual rate shall be based on holder,s
actual rate of return from the Local Agency Investment Fund.
The undersigned promises and agrees to make monthly
installment Payments of two'thousand-seven-hundred-nineteen
dollars-and-sixteen cents ($2,719.16) for such period of time
sufficient to meet the balance due under this Note. Payments to
be made to City of Temecula at the above referenced address.
ShoUld the Promisor fail to make any three or more payments, the
entire remaining balance shall become due and payable immediately
upon notice to the Promisor from the holder hereof or its legal
representative.
In accordance with that certain agreement dated
__, 199_ and identified as Agreement--Loan FundE For
Public Purposes, holder will accept/n-kind service payments as
set out in said agreement or cash for each payment hereunder.
If action is instituted on this Note, the undersigned,
on behalf of the Boys and Girls Club of Temecula Valley, Inc.,
promise to pay the holder thereof any expenses incurred thereby,
including, but not limited to, court ~osts and such other sums as
the Court may fix as reasonable attorney's fees.
This Note or any portion thereof may be prepaid at any
time without penalty.
2O304,~,.BTE ~
JLIN- 1-93 TUE 8:54 BWS COSTA MESA FAX NO. 7]47555848
P. 04
In agreement thereof, we execute this Note on behalf of
the Boys and Girls club of Temecula Valley, Inc. on the
day of
California. , 19 _ in the City of ·
PROMIBOR:
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF
TEMECUIA VALLEY, INC.
(signature)
Its:
(typed name)
(title)
Its:
(signature)
(typed name)
(title)
HOLDMR:
CITY OF TEMECULA, a California
general law municipal corporation
MAYOR
2030435. mE - 2 -
/,--
ITEM
TO.'
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER ~
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning .~'~
August 25, 1992
Appointments to Development Code Advisory Committee
RECOMMENDATION:
It is requested that the City Council:
APPOINT a representative from the City Council and five
members- at-large to the Development Code Advisory
Committee.
DISCUSSION:
As part of the continuing work program for the General Plan, The Planning Center has begun
work on the City's Development Code (zoning ordinance). To assist in the preparation of the
Code staff is recommending the City Council appoint an Advisory Committee to review and
provide direction on the Development Code. The purpose of the advisory committee is to
provide input on the procedures, standards and regulations contained within the proposed
code. Staff feels the advisory committee will play an important role in assuring the Code is
easy to use, implements the goals and policies of the General Plan, and protects the
community's public health, safety and welfare.
Staff proposes the advisory committee include an appointee by each Councilmember, as well
as a representative from the Council and Commission. Planning Department Staff and the
City Attorney will also serve on the Committee. -The advisory committee should include
representatives from the community, including perhaps a local planner, architect, landscape
architect, developer or representative from a local community group.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The approved budget for FY 92-93 has allocated 930,000 under Account No. 100-161-999-
5248.
S%DEVCODE~ADVCOMM.R1 C
ITEM NO. 19
APPROVAT.
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
A GENDA REPORT
City Council
David F. Dixon, City Manager
June 8, 1993
Grant for Tourism Advertising
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council consider the request of the Tourism Council
of the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce for $5000 to be used in an advertising
campaign which will be coordinated with the Vintner's Association.
STAFF REPORT:
Attached you will find a letter from the Tourism Council of the Temecula Valley
Chamber of Commerce requesting assistance in extendingthe length of an advertising
campaign which was created to offset the negative publicity generated by the January
flooding. The initial campaign was funded .with a grant of $25,000 from the
California Trade and Commerce Agency. Advertisements placed in connection with
the grant are expiring and the Tourism Council would like to extend the length of the
campaign. The Tourism Council is requesting $5000 from the City and $5000 from
the Temecula Valley Vintners Association to accomplish this goal. The Vintners have
committed $5000 toward the advertising campaign, predicated on the City's
participation.
FINANCIAL IMPA C T:
If the Council decides to act favorably on this request, staff will determine the
appropriate source of funding and will be prepared to share that information with the
City Council at the meeting of June 8, 1993.
27450 Ynez Rd., 6te. 104
Temecula, CA 92591
(909) 6/6-5090
May 18, 1993
Dave Dixon
City Manager
City of Temecula
Mr. Dixon,
The Tourism Council of the Temecu]a Valley Chamber of Commerce
recently secured assistance in the form of a grant totaling
$25,000 worth of prjnt advertising through the California Trade
and Commerce Agency. The funds awarded are to mitigate the
negative publj. cj=y created by the January floods, impacting the
local tourism industry with a substantial loss of business.
The Vintner's Association has guaranteed an add].tional sum of
monies to enhance the advertising effort already underway. The
Vintner,s Association is contributing $3,000, $5,000 ]f their
contribution is matched by the City of Temecula.
The City,s jnvolvement with this project will send a positive
signal to area tourist related businesses and will also indicated
to state level government the City of Temecuia's willingness to
stand behind the community in times of crisis.
The funds requested will be utilized ~0 extend the length of the
current advertising campaign. Enclosed are copies of the ads
that have been placed, as well as a schedule of the full
campaign.
Thank you for you consideration of our request
your response. ·
We eagerly await
Dave Wilson, Chairperson
Tomecula Valley Chamber of Commerce 'Tourism Council
CC:
Dearie Manning, President - Temecula Valley Chamber of
Commerce
Le]gh Engdahl, EMeuutive Director, '!~;CC
Scarleft Dwver. who owns Scar-
lett's Country hm in the Nap, Val-
ley· says tied same tiling. 'My kids
grew up here. and I still reahy
{oy children." Like Zolla. Dwver
l~as a crib and high chair. "plu~ a
couple of chickens the kids love to
feed."
Naturally· some inns are more
suitable for kids than others,
Dxx.wer cautions. "Parents should
look for rooms .xxith private en-
trances or that are detached from
mcst afIordabk." with rates of S49-
S¢;9 per night. Blon~ House. 1372
Minden I'drive. San Diego. Calif.
92111: ( G 1 H J 4 G7 -
A "world of ion,.,'-forSotten South-
ere hospitality and service" lures
Mrs. Carl Heller of Brea to the Wal-
lingford Inn in Ashland. Kan. She
likes the canopted bed. floral chine
and yards of lace found in the Wal-
lin~ord room. At $455-55 per
night. "resonable rates. too." Wal-
lingford Inn. P.O. Box 799. Ashland.
Kan. 67831: [316) 635-2129.
lit~(~l' :k~itltK'C[ ~Hltt' Ii~.N ft., il. ltkt~tlt
pine daybed plump with load,; of
pillows. In Serengeti. on the garden
level witl~ a private entrance. a
whicker basket stuffed with maga-
zincs nestles bem'een m-o wicker
chairs. In Chawton. where I staved.
a garden window box, hand-.4ten-
cried flowers on the wall and cher-
ub faces cozily transform the for-
mer mald's quarters.
.MI the decorations must make
for a dusting nightmare, but noth-
ing seems overdone. Eventhing
blends in peaceful hues. It gets a bit
snug with luE...*;t;
rooms.
~mbianc~: Th.
truvel. The u;tv
just returned ir',E
ruins in Bcliz~-. '.
passion xxith ti~ci:
travel tip slmct~
places such us
HannH.
.~ Gene Sweu
afternoon fire in
room at the 5 p.m.
engage y~ in tal~
11 tl:l;I.ll ;.ik
T1/FR YTHING
A Paradise of Simple Pleasures
While this is a golfer's paradise with courses designed by Mark O'Meara and Robert Trent Jones. there
is so much to explore ... A picnic in wine country among rolling vineyards and wildflowers, 11 vintners
offering award .'inning wines and champagne. ;he famous Balloon a~d Wine Festival on May 1 and 2,
and browsing through antique and specialt3, shops in historic Old Town.
g ;~ ~'; TEMECULA GET-AWAY Tour SiECtAL 1
~ INCLUDES:
*Walking lout of historic Old Town.
*Guided tasting mp through scen,c wine country. fo the
5' ~ ,4lEer hours. caIl' (9091 695.99997°r~' price of
L.
-. ~ Based upon space availability. Must present this ad. Offer expires 7/10/93
For more information on Paradise (the Temecula Valley) Contact:
Temccula Valley Chamber of Commerce * 27450 Yne: Rd.. Suite 104 * Temecula. CA 92591 * (909) 676-5090
GeUway Pachge~
hcludes 2 Nitos 10d~.g,
tor Castle or Cruise.
available. For reservatio:
805-5~
For reae~ons c
Ne~ A ezqn~ce
909-8C
BEAR MAI~
BIG
Sp~gla~tmvedtMt
the mox~ti~.t Weeg~:~
W~e[~y~ ~ad mght
1-800.4
~=; rutr
CAPISTRA1V0
& patios. Honeymoo~ & r
Rttes from S49 iacl
hi~bor. Carl to reserve
I.~00-2~
C0110NAD0 VI{
Ronamic b'ttway roor
walks, bikes, dazcelfiuse
6194~
HARBORR
HOUSE/S
Ideal loca~ou for b~.
bo,,eymmas, hz~y reumc
date 16 adults. Carnage
for 2. Private baths.
~ ata~ed. Rates
619-2~
For IH
F, carlett l)xvver. who ~nvns Scar-
lctt's Connit->' inn in the Napa X'a~-
icy. sitys the same thing. 'My kids
~'ew up here. and I still really en-
joy children." Like Zolla. DxxTer
has a crib and high chair. "plus a
couple of eh~kens the ~ds love to
feed·"
Naturally. some inns are more
suitable for kids than oihers,
Dx~3'er cautions. "Parents should
look for rooms .with private en-
trances or that are detached from
· m¢~t aflo~xlabk." .'ith mitt-~ t~
$1;.~ per night. Blom House. 1372
.Minden I)rive. San Diego. Calif.
92111: ((;19)
A "world of long-fin'gotten South-
ern hospitalit>' and senqce" lures
Mrs. Carl Hellor of Brea to the Wal-
lin~ord Inn in .-kshland. Kan. She
likes the canepied bed. floral chintz
and yards of lace found in the Wal-
lin.~ord room. At $455-55 per
night, "resonable rates, too." Wai-
lin~ord Inn, P.O. Box 799. Ashland,
Kan. 67831: (316) 635-2129.
H qlll II/
FVtCR YT'HING
pine daybed plump with loads of
pillows. 'in Serengeti. on the garden
level witi~ a private entrance. a
whicker basket stuffed with maga-
zincs nestles bem'een two ~x'icker
chairs. In Chawton. where I staved.
a garden window box, hand-~ten-
ciled flowers on the wall and cher-
ub faces cozily transform the for-
mer maid's quarters.
All the decorations must make
for a dusting nightmare, but noth-
ing seems overdone· Even'thing
blends in peaceful hues· It gets a bit
A Paradise of Simple Pleasures
While this is a golfer's paradise with courses designed by Mark O'Meara and Robert Trent Jones, there
is so much to explore ... A picnic in wine countr), among rolling vineyards and wildflowers, 11 vintners
offering award winning wines and champagne. the famous Balloon and Wine Festival on May 1 and 2,
and browsing through antique and specialty shops in historic Old Town.
TEMECULA GET-AWAY TOUR SPECIAL
INCLUDES:
*Walking tour of historic Old Town. 2 1
*Guided lasting trip through scenic wine country. for the
*A grapevine cutting to plant at home. price of
Call ~9o~ 676-5090 for resen'at,ons.
Afwr ho.rs. call.' 0091 695-9999.
Based ,,pen space availability. Must present this ad. Offer expires 7/10/93
· For more information on Paradise (the Temecula I/alley) Contact:
· , Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce * 27450 Yne: Rd.. Suite 104 * Temecula. CA 92591 * (909) 676-5090
snug with luggag
room s.
Arabianee: Tt~,
travel. The day I ~
just returned fror:
ruins in Belize. ~
passion wi~eir
travel tip s. . tL
places such ~q Sa
HawaH.
.~ Gene Swett
afternoon fire in th
room at the 5 p.m.
engage y~ in tal
ADOBE INN-SA
6etaway Padres:
~r ~e ~ C~. hc
805-54
For ~a~o~ ~
~PL~ B~t
909~
BE~ ~
BIG B~
Sp~g ~ ~d ~ t
~e m~. ~k~,
W~ 2nd ~g~ ~
1-80~
C~IST~O
1~0~2~
CORON~O ~(
~ ~way ~ b
~k ~. F~
w~, b~ ~
619~
HOUSE/~
I~ ]~ for ~
2. ~e h~s, ~
ITEM
20
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER ~
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
City Manager/City Council
FROM:
City Attorney
DATE:
June 8, 1993
SUBJECT:
Settlement of Claim and Release between the City of Temecula and New
Lutheran Church and the Pacific Southwest District - Lutheran Church
Missouri Synod [Lutheran Church Extension Fund].
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council:
Approve, in substantially the form presented, the Agreement entitled:
"SETTLEMENT OF CLAIM AND RELEASE BETWEEN THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AND NEW COMMUNITY LUTHERAN CHURCH AND THE
PACIFIC SOUTHWEST DISTRICT - LUTHERAN CHURCH MISSOURI
SYNOD [LUTHERAN CHURCH EXTENSION FUND]"
Authorize the City Manager to enter into the escrow and any other
necessary agreement including consulting agreement necessary to implement
the settlement.
o
Authorize the City Manager to enter into an engineering consulting
agreement to design a buildable lot of 7.72 acres at Pauba and Margarita
Roads, not to exceed $15,000.
DISCUSSION: Last November 10, 1992, the City Council denied an application for a
public use permit for the New Community Lutheran Church to build its worship facilities at
the corner of Santiago and Ynez Roads. Subsequently, the Church filed a tort claim
against the City on or about February 9, 1993.
R:\Agenda. Rpt~Church 1
Agenda Report
Settlement of Claim - Community Lutheran Church
June 8, 1993
Page 2.
Since then, City Staff and Church representatives have been negotiating a settlement
agreement, including a land exchange, with the objective that the Church would not be
materially better or worse off at the new site. To that end, the attached Settlement
Agreement has been negotiated. It provided in principal, as follows:
The Church Land at Santiago and Ynez Roads shall be exchanged for 7.72
acre buildable site on the City Land property, located within the Parkview
property at Pauba and Margarita Roads.
The City shall prepare a grading plan for the City Land, and shall rough grade
the City Land into a 7.72 acre buildable site. Simultaneously, the City shall
rough grade the adjacent section of Pauba Road.
The Church shall widen Pauba Road to four lanes and install curb, gutter and
sidewalks from Primavera Road to the City Land. The Church shall also
extend utilities to the City Land. The cost of this work is approximately the
same as the cost the Church would have incurred for off-site improvements
at the Church Land.
FISCAL IMPACT -
$15,000 - Grading Plan
$383,450. - Cost to Grade City Land and adjacent Pauba
Road
$205,450 -- City Land Excavation
$ 78,000 = Pauba Road Excavation
$ 49,000 = Pauba Road Crib Wall (To
Protect Ex-residences)
$333,450
$ 50,000 = 15% contingency
$383,450
Indeterminate loss of value in exchanging City Land for Church
Land.
Funds are available in the Public Works Consulting budget to
do the grading plan. An appropriation for the grading will be
requested when the grading contract is submitted to Council
for approval.
ATTACHMENTS:
Cost Estimates
Settlement Agreement
R:\Agenda. Rpt\Church 2 -~
PROJECT:
CHURCH SITE/PAUBA ROAD EXTENSION
COST ESTIMATE FOR FULL WIDTH WIDENING (88' ROW)
FROM PRIMAVERA ROAD EAST TO PROPOSED CHURCH SITE ACCESS
~ 1040 LF
Page 1
Church Site/Pauba Road
DATE: April 6, 1993
QUANTITY
UNIT
ITEM
UNIT
COST
AMOUNT
26,000 C.Y. Excavation
GRADING
3.00
$78.000.00
*Assuming disposal within City Parkview property to the North
39,100 S.F.
1,995 L.F.
80 L.F.
182 L.F.
2,264 L.F.
4,925 S.F.
2 EA.
650 S.F.
5 EA.
2,000 S.F.
1 L.S.
Subtotal
STREET IMPROVEMENTS
A.C. Paving $ 1.50
Curb & Gutter $ 6.00
Curb Only $ 5.50
A.C. Berm $ 2.50
Sawcut Ex Pvmt $ 1.130
Sidewalk 6' $ 2.9,25
Access Ramps $ 325
PCC X-Gutter $ 3.00
Street Lights $ 1,500
Access Road $ 3.00
Crib Wall $ 49,000
$78,000.00
$58,650.00
$11,970.00
$440.00
$455.00
$2,264.00
$11,081.25
$650.00
$1,950.00
$7,500.00
$6,000.00
$49,000.00
HotWATER IMPROVEMENTS
1 EA. Tap $
I EA. ~8" Wedge Value $
26 L.F. ~8' P.V.C. Main $
Subtoml
5.000 $
7O0 $
15 $
$149,960.25
$5,000.00
$700.00
$390.00
1,084
2
Subtotal
'SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
L.F. 8' P.v.C. Sewer Main $ 13 $
EA. 48" Manholes $ 3,000 $
$6,090.00
$14,092.00
$6,000.00
Subtotal
$20,092.00
Total: $
15% Contingency: $
Grand Total: $
$254,142.25
$38,121.34
$292,263.59
***Note existing GTE, S.C.E. & Cable Utilities will be relocated by their respective agencies at their cost.
PROPOSED CHURCH SITE GRADING
7 ACRES NET
COST ESTIMATE
PROJECT: Church Site/Pauba Road
QUANTITY UNIT
ITEM
Page 2
DATE: April 6, 1993
UNIT AMOUNT
COST
148,700 C.Y.
18,500 C.Y.
20,000 C.Y.
GRADING
Excavation ·
Alluvial Removal & Recompaction ·
Alluvial Removal & Recompaction (Offsite) *
1.00 $148,700.00
1.50 $27,750.00
1.50 $30,000.00
Total
*Quantifies are based off grading exhibit provided by the City of Temecula Superimposed on a 100' scale topo base.
**Export of 68,900 C.Y. to adjacent Park'view Property.
$148,700.00
0~, ~'tCa
SETTLEMENT OF CLAIM AND RELEASE BETWEEN
THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND NEW COMMUNITY
LUTHERAN CHURCH AND THE PACIFIC SOUTHWEST
DISTRICT - LUTHERAN CHURCH MISSOURI SYNOD
[LUTHERAN CHURCH EXTENSION FUND]
This Settlement and Claim and Release Agreement ("Agreement") is by and
between the City of Temecula ("City") and New Community Lutheran Church ("Church")
and the Lutheran Church Extension Fund - Missouri Synod ("LCEF") and shall become
effective only when executed by all parties hereto and when formally approved by the City
Council at a duly noticed meeting of the Council.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
The real property (Lot 86") which is subject matter of this Agreement is
property located in Riverside County in the City of Temecula at the southeast comer of
Santiago and Ynez Road ("Church Land"). The ti~e holder to Lot 86 is LCEF. LCEF and
Church have an agreement to enable Church to purchase the land from LCEF to enable
Church to erect worship facilities thereon.
During 1992, Church applied to City for a public use permit ("PUP") to erect
certain worship facilities on Lot 86.
On September 21, 1992, the City of Temecula Planning Commission
("Commission") considered the Church's PUP Lot 86 and denied the same.
Thereafter, the Church appealed the decision of the Commission to the City
Council ("City Council") of the City of Temecula.
On November 19, 1992, the City Council denied the Church's appeal.
The Church believes that both the denial of their PUP application for Lot 86
and the manner in which their PUP application was denied by the Commission and Council
violated their constitutional and other legal rights and that the Church has suffered monetary
damage as a result of those violations. The City disputes these allegations.
The City and the Church have met in an attempt to resolve the dispute between
themselves and have agreed upon a land exchange (the "Exchange") as a cornpromised
settlement of all claims which is memorialized by this Agreement.
R: \CityAUy~Chur~h. Agr I
1. LOCATION OF LAND TO BE EXCHANGED.
Church Land: Land, free of encumbrances, located at the southeast comer of
Santiago and Ynez Road which City if receiving from Church in this Land
Exchange ("City Land"). ("Church Land"). More particularly described in
Exhibit A hereto.)
Be
City land: Buildable land, free of encumbrances, acceptable to Church,
located south and adjacent to Panba Road and west of the existing City of
Temecula Sports Park which Church is receiving from City in this land
Exchange (City Land"). (More particularly described in Exhibit B hereto.)
2. ESCROW OF LAND TO BE EXCHANGED.
As soon as reasonably possible, the parties will open an escrow (the "Escrow")
at Rosewood Escrow, providing that the parties will exchange the City Land for the Church
Land. The Church will receive comparable buildable City Land from the City in an amount
not less than Church's current buildable Church Land, i.e., 7.72 acres. The City Land shall
include the surrounding slopes. The instructions for said escrow shall contain provisions
which reasonably require the parties to obtain title insurance (each party at its own cost),
pro-rate property taxes (if any) as of date of close of escrow, and to assure themselves that
the property land exchange is geologically sound and free of toxic wastes and suitable for
construction. The Escrow shall close within 180 days of opening, or shall be terminated.
3. UTILITY CONNECTIONS.
Church agrees that it will bear all costs necessary to bring all utilities to the
_site of the City Land being exchanged with the Church at no cost to the City.
4. STREET IMPROVEMENTS.
Prior to issuance of a certificate of oi:cupancy for any building on the City
Land, Church shall design, widen and construct Pauba Road to four lanes, plus curb, gutter
and sidewalk on the north side of the street, from Primavera Road west to the City Land.
The Church shall pay all engineering, design, grading, permit, and construction costs,
provided that the City shall rough grade Pauba Road concurrently with rough grading the
City Land. As a condition to the closing of the Escrow, Church shall provide the City with
City approved rough grading plans for Pauba Road prior to the close of the Escrow.
R:\CityAtty\Churgh .Agr 2
5. COSTS & FEES INCURRED IN EXCHANGE.
City and Church shall each bear one-half (1/2) of the Escrow costs and fees
incurred in connection with the Exchange, including but not limited to title insurance fees.
Each party shall bear its own legal fees.
6. ZONE CHANGE AND PUBLIC USE PERMIT.
Prior to and as a condition of the clog of Escrow, the Church shall obtain
approved Land use entitlement for the City Land, including a zone change and plot plan
necessary for construction of a Church on the City Land. The City is under no obligation to
approve any land use applications, and the Church is not obligated to authorize the closing of
Escrow until it receives land use enti~ements satisfactory to the Church. If the Church does
not receive satisfactory land use entiflements within 120 days of the opening of Escrow, the
Escrow and this Agreement shall terminate.
7. GRADING OF CITY LAND FOR CHURCH USE.
Prior to the close of escrow, City shall prepare a plan to rough grade the City
Land into a 7.72 buildable site. City agrees that within one hundred and eighty (180) days
after closing of the escrow, approval of land use enti~ements for worship facilities on the
City Land in a form acceptable to the Church, and delivery of approved grading plans for
Pauba Road, whichever occurs last, City shall complete rough grade and compact the City
Land. City agrees that it shall bear all said costs of rough grading the City Land incurred in
yielding a buildable pad of not less than 7.72 acres. Church should bear the responsibility of
its own cost, for preparing site for construction beyond the rough grading stage.
,
CHURCH'S RELEASE OF PENDING/IMMINENT LEGAL CLAIMS
COND1TIONED.
Conditioned upon the closing of Escrow and the approval of Land Use
entitlement for the Church's worship facilities on the City Land, Church agrees as follows:
A,
Church and LCEF and their owners, partners, officers, agents, employees, members,
assigns and successors-in-interest, release City from any and all rights, claims,
demands, and damages of any kind, known or unknown, asserted or unasserted,
existing or arising on or before the date of execution of this Agreement and resulting
from or related to the conditions or the allegations of the ton claim which the Church
and LCEF filed with the City on or about February 9, 1993, which is attached as
Exhibit D hereto. Church and LCEF understand and agree that all of their rights
under Section 1542 of the Civil Cede of California or any similar law of any state or
R:\CityAUy~,Church .Agr 3
Cw
territory of the United States are hereby expressly waived. Said section reads as
follows:
"Section 1542. General Release - Claims Extinguished. A
general release does not extend to claims which the creditor
does not know or suspect to exist in his favor at the time of
executing the release, which, if known by him, must have
materially affected his settlement with the debtor."
It is understood and agreed that this Agreement represents settlement of disputed
claims and is not to be construed as representing an admission of liability on behalf of
any party to this Agreement. The parties, however, intend to buy their peace and to
forever provide a full and complete release and discharge from any and all liability
arising out of the transactions, matters, and events more particularly identified
hereinabove.
Parties expressly warrant, represent and agree that in executing this Agreement, they
do so with full knowledge of any rights which they have or may have with respect to
this Agreement and with respect to the hereinabove referenced claim.
The parties acknowledge that after entering into this Agreement, they may discover
different or additional facts concerning the subject matter of this Release or their
understanding of those facts. The parties therefore, expressly assume the risk of such
facts being so different and agree that this Agreement shall, in all respects, be
effective and not subject to rescission, cancellation or termination by reason of any
such additional or different facts.
ATYORNEY FEES/COSTS INCURRED IN REGARD TO ENFORCEMENT OF
THIS AGREEMENT.
Should any party thereto employ an attorney for the purpose of enforcing or
construing this Agreement, or any judgment based on this Agreement in any legal proceeding
whatsoever, including; insolvency, bankruptcy, arbitration, declaratory relief, or other
litigation, including appeals or rehearings, the prevailing party shall be entitled to receive
from the other party reimbursement for all attorney's fees and costs, including, but not
limited to, service of process, filing fees, court and court reporter costs, investigative costs,
expert witness fees, and the cost of any bond whether taxable or not. Should any judgment
or final order be issued in that proceeding, such reimbursement shall be specified therein.
The "prevailing party" means that party determined by the court to most nearly prevail, and
not necessarily the one in whose favor a judgment is granted.
R:XCityAuy\Church .Agr 4 ~
10. CONSTRUCTION OF TERMS.
This Agreement and the terms thereof shall be constructed and enforced in
accordance with the Laws of the State of California.
11. BINDING ON SUCCESSORS.
All the terms of this Agreement shall be binding upon, and inure to the benefit
of, and be enforceable by, the parties hereto and their respective legal representatives,
successors and assignees.
12. EXECUTION OF ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS.
The parties hemto agree to execute such additional documents as may be
reasonably necessary or appropriate to implement the terms and provisions of this
Agreement.
13. COUNTERPARTS.
This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which so executed
shall be deemed an original; and such counterparts shall together constitute but one
Agreement.
R: ~CityAuy \Church. Agr 5
.~-
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto set their hand the day
and year set forth opposite each party respective name.
CHURCH
DATED: ,1993
President
a Non-Profit Organization
LCEF
DATED: , 1993
Gerald E. Wentit, Vice President
Lutheran Church Extension Fund-
Missouri Synod, a Non-Profit
Organization
CITY
DATED: , 1993
By:
J. Sal Munoz, Mayor
City of Temecula
By:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM
By:
Scott F. Field
City Attorney
R:\CityAUy\Chur~h.Agr 6 ~
TEMECULA COMMUNITY
SERVICES DISTRICT
AGENDA
ITEM
1
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
MAY 11, 1993
A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Community Services District was called to order
on Tuesday, May 11, 1993, 7:50 P.M., at the Temecula Community Center, 22816 Pujol
Street, Temecula, California. The meeting was called to order by President Patricia H. Birdsall.
PRESENT: 5 DIRECTORS: Mu~oz, Parks, Roberts, Stone, Birdsall
ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None
Also present were City Manager David Dixon, Assistant City Manager Woody Edvalson, City
Attorney F. Scott Field, City Clerk June S. Greek and Recording Secretary Gail Zigler.
PUBLIC COMMENT
None
CONSENT CALENDAR
It was moved by Director Parks, seconded by Director Stone to approve Consent Calendar
Items No. I - 4.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 5
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 0
DIRECTORS: Mu~oz, Parks, Roberrs, Stone, Birdsall
DIRECTORS: None
DIRECTORS: None
Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of April 13, 1993.
,/~,, CSDMIN5/11193 -1- 611193
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MINUTES
MAY 11, 1993
Aqreement and Bonds to Improve Neiohborhood Park Site - Van Daele Develooment
Corporation
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1
Approve an agreement and accept surety bonds provided by the
developer to improve the neighborhood park within Tract No. 22627-0,
Van Daele Development Corporation.
Aqreement and Bonds to Improve Neiqhborhood Park Site - Preslev Companies of San
Dieao
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1
Approve an agreement and accept surety bonds to improve a 9.2 ace
neighborhood park within Tract 23267-2 and allow the developer to
obtain an additional fifty-two (52) building permits.
Landscape Maintenance Contract APProvals
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1
Award contracts to Fallbrook Landscape, Excel Landscape, California
Landscape, Accurate landscape and Pro-Scape, Inc. to provide
landscape maintenance services for the Temecula Community Services ·
District for FY 1993-94.
GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT
None
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT
Director Nelson advised that beginning June 24, 1993 and continuing through August 26,
1993, a Substance Abuse and Teen Counseling Program will be offered at the Teen Center
from 12:00 PM to 2:00 PM. Bunny Collins, with the Riverside County Department of Mental
Health, has offered to donate her time, free of charge, for this first summer session.
CSDMIN5/11/93 -2- 6/1193
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MINUTES
BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS
None
MAY 11, 1993
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Director Parks, seconded by Director Stone to adjourn at 7:55 P.M.
The next regular meeting of the City of Temecula Community Services District will be held on
Tuesday, May 25, 1993, 8:00 PM, Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street,
Temecula, California.
President Patricia H. Birdsall
June S. Greek, City Clerk
~ CSDMINS/11/93 -3- 6/1193
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
HELD MAy 25, 1993
A regular meeting of the Temecula Community Services District was called to order at 8:25
PM in the Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, President Patricia H. Birdsall
presiding.
PRESENT: 3 DIRECTORS:
Parks, Mu~oz, Birdsall
ABSENT: 2 DIRECTORS:
Roberrs, Stone
Also present were Assistant City Manager Harwood Edvalson, City Attorney Scott F. Field and
June S. Greek, City Clerk.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None given.
CONSENT CALENDAR
It was moved by Director Parks, seconded by Director MuAoz to approve items number I and
2 on the consent calendar as follows:
Combinina Balance Sheet and Statement of Revenues, Exoenditures and Chanaes in
Fund Balance for the Nine (9) Months Ended March 31, 1993
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1
Receive and File Report
t
AcceDtance of Mass GradinQ for the Community Recreation Center Phase 1 - PW 92-
.029)
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1
Accept the mass grading for the Community Recreation Center - Phase
1, project 92-029 as complete and direct the City Clerk to file the Notice
of Completion.
2.2
Accept a one-year Maintenance Bond (10% of contract amount) and
authorize release of the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after
filing the Notice of Completion if no liens have been filed.
Minute~ TCSO 0625=83
1 05128/~3
The motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: 3 COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT:
1.2
Parks, Mu~oz, Birdsall
None
2 COUNCILMEMBERS: Roberrs, Stone
Approve the minutes of February 23, 1993.
e
TCSD Prooosed Rates and Charges for FY 1993-94 and EstablishinQ a New Benefit
Zone Entitles Service Level "R"
Community Services Director Shawn Nelson presented the staff report outlining the
provisions of the resolutions setting the public hearings to consider the TCSD rates and
charges. He also outlined the provisions of the resolution dealing with the amendment
to the appeal process.
Director Mu~oz questioned the intent of the new service level "R". Director Nelson
explained that this is being established to handle costs for unimproved roads within the
City.
Director Parks asked if the appeal process provides for ample opportunity to file an
appeal. City Attorney Scott Field explained the time period allowed follows closely the
County's time schedule for property tax assessments. He stated this procedure allows
the tax bill to be adjusted prior to the issuance of the annual assessments rather than
requiring payment by the property owner with a reimbursement sometime later if the
appeal is granted.
It was moved by Director Mu~oz, seconded by Director Parks to approve staff
recommendations 3.1 and 3.2 as follows:
3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 93-01
A RESOLUTION OF THE COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ACCEPTING THE FILING OF A REPORT ON THE PROPOSED
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT RATES AND CHARGES FOR
FISCAL YEAR 1993-94 AND SETTING A TIME A PLACE FOR PUBLIC HEARING
IN CONNECTION THEREWITH
Minu~ee TCSO 062683 2 06128/93 ~
3.2 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 93-02
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ESTABLISH
A BENEFIT ZONE ENTITLED SERVICE LEVEL "R" WITHIN ITS BOUNDARIES
AND SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING IN CONNECTION
THEREWITH
Director Parks asked if the reason for the proposed increase in Service Level A is based
on the anticipated cost of graffiti removal. Community Services Director Nelson
advised the Board that staff will be preparing two scenarios at the time of the public
hearing to show two programs for consideration regarding graffiti removal, one using
in-house services and one contract services.
The motion was unanimously carried, with Directors Roberrs and Stone absent.
It was moved by Director Mu~oz, seconded by Director .Parks to approve staff
recommendation 3.3 as follows, with the exception that the appeal period may be
extended with the understanding that the property owner will be responsible for costs
incurred after the July 1, filing deadline.
3.3
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION CSD 93-03
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICTAMENDING THE PROCESS FOR APPEALING
THE ADOPTION OF RATES AND CHARGES AGAINST PROPERTY WITHIN THE
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT.
The motion was unanimously carried with Directors Roberts and Stone absent.
GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT
No report given.
COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR REPORT
None given.
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Director Parks, seconded by Director Mu~oz to adjourn at 8:44 PM to the
Mint,tee TCSD 062683 3 06128/93
next regular meeting to be held at the Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street,
Temecula on June 8, 1993, 8:00 PM. The motion was unanimously carried with Director
Roberrs and Director Stone absent.
Patricia H. Birdsall, President
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, TCSD Secretary
Minutes TCSD 062613 4 06128/i3 '~%
ITEM
NO.
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER/~:~
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
FROM:
DAVID F. DIXON, CITY MANAGER
DATE:
MAY 26, 1993
SUBJECT:
CONTRACT AMENDMENT FOR WIMMER YAMADA
ASSOCIATES - PALA ROAD PARK SITE
PREPARED BY:
RECOMMENDATION:
SHAWN D. NELSON, COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR
That the Board of Directors:
Approve amendment of 921,038 to contract with Wimmer Yamada Associates (WYA)
to provide additional engineering services for the Pala Road park site.
2. Appropriate 921,038 in the capital projects fund (210-190-120-5802) from
Development Impact Fees.
DISCUSSION: On August 25, 1992, the Board of Directors awarded a contract
of $185,400 to WYA to provide design services for the 28 acre park site located adjacent to
Pala Road. On January 26, 1993, the Board approved an amendment of $17,000 for design
of an additional restroom facility and offsite access improvements.
As a result of the design process, it has been determined that additional work is required to
comply with State and Federal Regulatory Agencies, i.e., Federal Emergency Management
Agency (FEMA), Army Corps of Engineers. This additional work includes modifying the
existing floodplain/HEC-2 studies and request of a Conditional Letter of Map Revision through
FEMA; FEMA plan check fees; conducting trapping studies for Stephens' Kangaroo Rat as
recommended in the Stephens' Kangaroo Rat Habitat Assessment report dated April 28,
1993; and processing a Nationwide permit required by the Army Corps of Engineers.
,,~,., r:\C~AFadas~AIe~mb.~'YA
052693
A recap of the additional expenses are as follows:
1. HEC-2 study and FEMA plan check fees
,950
2. Stephens' Kangaroo Rat Trapping Study
6,500
Corps of Engineers Section 404 Nationwide
Permit No. 26 Consultant Fees
2,588
$21,038
It is therefore recommended that the contract with WYA be amended to include the additional
engineering and architectural design services for this project with a not-to-exceed amount of
921,038. With the completion of the above services, the construction documents for the
park site on Pala Road will be ready for formal public bid this summer.
FISCAL IMPACT: Total costs of
$225,538. It is requested to appropriate
Development Impact fees.
the design services contract with WYA is
$21,038 in the capital projects fund from
r:~C~'adas~ASt13da. WYA ~
052~3
AMENDMENT NO. 03 TO CONTRACT ORDER NO. 12838
Pala Road Park Site
May 26. 1993
The Agreement dated August 25. 1992. 199:3, between the City of Temecula, and
Wimmer and Yamada Associates WYA) (heroinafter referred to as "Agreement") is
hereby amended as follows:
RE: Additional Services
Section I
Scope of Work is hereby amended to include additional services as described in
Exhibit "A" (attached).
Compensation for these additional services is a not to exceed $21,038 to be paid in
one (1) lump sum following completion of said service.
Section 2
All other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain the same.
The parties hereto have executed this Amendment on the date and year above
written.
By:
CONSULTANT
By:
CITY OF TEMECULA
J. Sal Mu~oz, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Scott F. Field, City Attorney
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
EXtlmlT A
PALA RD. PARK
HF.C.-2 STUDY AND FF-MA PLAN ~--HF,.CK F, FES
Perform tlec-2 analysis for application of a floodplain amendment and a flood way map
revision to permit installation of fill within floodplain area and second reslroom buildlng.
within floodway area. Fee includes process. application, and approvals.
~I'EPHEN'S IC_AJqGAROO RAT TRAPPING ~FUD~
To perform a trapping study to confirm presence or non-pre~ence of the Stcphcn's
Kangaroo I~t. Since this spccics is listed as an endangered species the Dept. of Fjsh and
Wildlife requires that the verification study be complctcd. If species k found on this site,
the city will enter into a mitigation program through a land credit exchange.
CORPS OF ~NGINEERS SECTION 404 NATIONWIDE PERMIT 26
CONSUI-TANT FEES
To perform neces~mt), study and research for determination of Army Corps jurisdiction
on project site which would require additional appli~dt~on for a 404 permit. F.~cpctk~e
includes consul 'tant team meeting with Army Corps staff to present documentation proving
that current d~ign is acceptable under a nationwide permit (26) program (less than 2 ac.
impact on WctlancLs area.)
ADDITIONAl. FEE .~CHEDULE
The total fee for services as described above wiJl be the lump sum amount of TWENTY
ONE THOUSAND THIRTY EIGHT DOLLARS ($21,038.00).
y YAAIAJM. FA.qLA k lF2111 D. ~IIIIQN. ~, P,IalICI~ W. ,~.~kli(alKV, A.edJ,, PBmtll~kLI
Firm AVkNtiE & ~kqk DI~ CAIJI'~It~IA llZ lOl - Mgr2,32..tQ04, FAX 61W2,12de, ld
JI.)I-I~JLqIN AVEM. t~ · Rq'l~ 10] · T-~l~i'ffi.A, CAi.IFrlNiA e;2~90,714/bq4.(,~3, FAX 714~u4~.~5
CA RI'.,i: 15ill. t'L~V AKll 121~5
ITEM
NO.
3
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER /~,
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
DAVID F. DIXON, CITY MANAGER
JUNE 8, 1993
ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENT DEEDS
MAINTENANCE - THE PRESLEY COMPANIES
FOR
SLOPE
PREPARED BY:
RECOMMENDATION:
~c~,x BERYL YASINOSKY, DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANT
That the Board of Directors:
Accept easement deeds for the TCSD to provide slope maintenance services 'within the
Presley Development.
DISCUSSION: The enclosed easement deeds have been reviewed by staff to
insure that legal and landscaping requirements have been satisfied. The slope landscaping
areas have been inspected by our Maintenance Superintendent and are acceptable to our
standards. Copies of the site plans for the TCSD landscape areas are also attached for your
review. The following tracts are recommended for acceptance for slope maintenance
purposes:
1. Tract 23267-0
2. Tract 23267-1
3. Tract 23267-4
4. Tract 26861-1
FISCAL IMPACT: Cost to maintain the slope areas is included within the TCSD
Rates and Charges for FY 1'993/94 - Service Level C.
r:~C~Agendas\Presley.527
lHOSE PORTIONS OF LOTS 1 THROUGH 50~ TRACT NO. 25267-4. IN THE
CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS
RECORDED IN BOOK 256, PAGES 21 THROUGH 24 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF
THE COUNTY RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF R I VERS I DE, DESCR I BED AS
FOLLOW:
BEGINNING AT THE MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER OF LOT I OF TRACT
NO. 25267-4, SAID POINT ALSO BEING ON THE EASTERLY LINE OF LOT "A"
OF SAID TRACT NO. 23267-4; THENCE ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF
SAID LOTS i THROUGH 5 OF SAID TRACT, NORTH 16'56'43" WEST
202.89 FEET TO THE MOS1 WESTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 5, SAID POINT
ALSO BEING ON THE NORTHWESTERLy LINE OF LOT "5" OF SAID TRACT NO.
23267-4; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHWESTERLy LINE OF SAID LOT 5~ NORTH
24°10'07" EAST 35.65 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 5;
THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 5, NORTH 74'00'00" EAST
77.61 FEET TO THE NORTHEASTERLy LINE OF SAID LOT 5; THENCE ALONG
THE NORTHEASTERLy LINE OF SAID LOT 5~ SOUTH 55'28'21" EAST 4.78I
THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTHEASTERLy LINE, SOUTH 72'06°18" WEST 41.52
FEET; THENCE SOUTH 72'25'0i)" WEST 37.44 FEET; THENCE SOUTH
6e°~4'2e" EAST 4.55 FEET~ THENCE SOUTH 18'57'~7" WEST 27.78 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 72'21'10" WEST 4.21 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 14'48'56" EAST
20.97 FEETI THENCE SOUTH 16'56'47" EAST 44.99; THENCE SOUTH
16'46'51" EAST 44.88 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 16'50°05.. EAST 4'5.28 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 16'58'49" EAST 44.78 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF
SAID LOT l; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 1, SOUTH
74'00°00" WEST 8.62 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
SAID PARCEL "A" CONTAINS .056 ACRES MORE OR LESS
SEE EXHIBIT "C" ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART
HEREOF.
PARCEL "B"
TCSD LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE EASEMENT WITHIN
PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAy
THOSE PORTIONS OF LOTS "A" AND "8" OF TRACT NO. 25267-4, IN THE
CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS
RECORDED IN BOOK 236, PAGES 21 THROUGH 24 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF
THE COUNTY RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOW:
BEGINNING AT THE MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER OF LOT 1 OF TRACT NO. 25267-
4. SAID POINT ALSO BEING ON THE EASTERLY LINE OF LOT "A" OF SAID
TRACT; THENCE ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT "A", NORTH
16°36'45" WEST 202.89 FEET TO THE MOST WESTERLY CORNER OF LOT 5 OF
SAID tRACT, SAID POINT ALSO BEING ON THE SOUTHEASTERLy LINE OF LOT
"B" OF SAID TRACT; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHEASTERLY LINE, NORTH
24°10'07'' EAST 55.65 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT "B";
THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE, NORTH 74'00'00" EAST 77.61 FEET
TO THE MOST NORTHERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 5; THENCE ALONG SAID
NORTHERLy LINE OF SAID LOT 5, SOUTH 55'28'2i" EAST 4.78 FEET;
THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 5, NORTH 72'06'18"
EAST 2.52 FEET; THENCE NORTH 55'28'21" WEST 7.26 FEET; THENCE SOUTH
74'C~0'00" WEST 82.22 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 24'50'26" WEST 58.74 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 16'56'45" EAST 202.89 FEET TO THE SOUTHEASTERLy LINE
OF SAID LOT "A"; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHEASTERLy LINE, NORTH
73°23'17" EAST 6.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
SAiD PARCEL "B" CONTAINS 0.036 ACRES MORE OR LESS.
SUBJECT TO ALL COVENANTS, RIGHTST RIGHT OF WAY AND EASEMENTS OF
RECORD.
SEE EXHIBIT "C" ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART
HEREOF.
3.N. 225-89 5/06/95 GLI~/SBE
S ~¢ ~oc
[3~ ~,00.00' j~'~f' LINE DATA ' ·
· ~OfESSIO,_4t~'2 Lq NtG'3G'47'W 44.qq'
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE EASEMENT
' Q NL P, g-:~,,.f~, THOSE PORTIONS OF LOTS 1 THROUGH 5 AND
CII~OSI~Y En~ineer~ · Pla:~ur~e:yor~ OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF THE
~E~ 5850 El Caratrio Re61, Suite 200 UNTY OF RIVERSIDE
:~E::LI~TT(::),,T~TCarlshad, Callfornl. 92008
· Assoc~T~s (.~9) ,ss - ~2x0 EXHIBIT "C"
=~ecorded at request of and re~urn To:
Clerics Department
of Temecula
-~3174 Business Park Drive
7emecula, CA 92590
FF)r-c RECORDING
O, ~s-zrurnent is for the benefi~ of
:he City of Temecula and is entitled
:o be recorded without fee
:Gov~. Code 6103).
IRREVOCABLE OFFER TO DEDICATE
Parcel: TRACT NO. 23267-4
LOTS 6 THROUGH i0 AND
LOTS "A" AND "B"
Projec=. OLD VAIL RANCH
:OR A VALUABLE CONSIDEBA~ON, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged,
THE PRESLEY COMPANIES, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION
(" Grantor"), hereby irrevocably offers to dsdic3te to the City of Temecula (" Grantee "), together
.vith the' right to further grant or l~ansfer the same to others, a perpetual easement and right-of-way for
naintaining, operating, altering, repairing, and replacing equipment and landscaping over and within the boundaries
af that certain real property located in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, more particularly described in
-~xhibit "A" attached hereto, which is incorporated heroin by this reference (the "Easement Area").
"GRANTOR RESERVES THOSE 'CERTAIN RIGHTS DESCRIBED ON EXHIBIT "B',' ATTACHED HERETO."
f GRANTEE, or its governmental entiD/, successors, or assigns, determines it is unable, incapable, or unwilling to
naintain said Easement Area, maintenance shall, after notice, become the responsibility of GRANTOR, with all
:ovenants and agreements of this easement extending to and becoming obligations of all heirs, executors,
~.dministrators, successors and assigns of the GRANTOR.
GJC~/~AA A ~ ~
5--; o-To
GERAL~ P. NORDEMAN
SR. VICE PRESIDENT
;TATE OF CALIFORNIA)
:OUN3'Y OF RIVERSIDE ) s.s.
Dpeared ¢t , personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of
stjsfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and
cknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his~er/their authorized capaciD/lies), and that by
is/lner/their signatu~o~s) on the instrument the person(s), or the e,,d/y upon behalf of which the person(s) acted,
×ecuted the instrument.
JITNESS my hand and official seal.
CEFFi'IRCATE Of ACCEPTANCE
is to certify that the interest in real property conveyed by me within irrevor_.~ble Cfffer To Dediczte to the City of
.=rnecuJa, a political corporation and/or governmental agency, is hereby a__r~?pted by order of the Cjry Council The date below
the Grantee consents to the recorda~on thereof by its duly authorized officer.
June S. Greek, City C3erk
0131g2
EXHIBIT "B"
TO
IRREVOCABLE OFFER TO DEDICATE
Grantor hereby reserves for itself and VERANDA AT BRIDLEVALE HONEOt,fNERS
ASSOCIATION, a California nonprofit mutual benefit corporation ("Association") the right,
but not the obligation, to plant flowering plants within the Easement Area. The party who
exercises this right shall be responsible for the maintenance of the flowering plants and their
removal or replacement when appropriate or at such time as the Grantee requests removal.
Grantee shall have no obligation to maintain, remove or replace any plants placed in the
Easement Area by Grantor's or the Association's exercise of this right.
5/5/93
EXHIBIT "A" ~ ~x~ ~-~/.~
PARCEL "A" - TCSD LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE EASEMENT
THOSE PORTIONS OF LOTS 6 THROUGH 10 OF TRACT NO. 25267-4, IN THE
CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS
RECORDED IN BOOK 256, PAGES 21 THROUGH 24 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF
THE COUNTY RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:
BEGINNIN6 AT THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF LOT 6 OF TRACT NO. 25267-
4; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 6, SOUTH 74'00°00"
WEST 80.85 FEET TO THE SOUTHWESTERLy LINE OF SAID LOT 6; THENCE
ALONG SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE, NORTH 56'40'5e" WEST 55.28 FEET TO
AN ANGLE POINT THEREIN, SAID POINT ALSO BEING A POINT ON THE
EASTERLY LINE OF LOT "A" OF SAID TRACT; THENCE ALONG SAID EASTERLY
LINE OF SAID LOT "A", NORTH 16'56°45" WEST 242.02 FEET TO THE
NORTHERLY LINE OF LOT 10 OF SAID TRACT; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY
LINE OF SAID LOT 10, SOUTH 81°25'24°. EAST e.21 FEET; THENCE LEAVING
SAID NORTHERLY LINE, SOUTH 16'51'16" EAST 40.04 FEET; THENCE SOUTH
16'5~°40" EAST 40.05 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 16'48'50" EAST 45.16 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 16°54'45" EAST 45.01 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 16°41'01'. EAST
44.~e FEET; THENCE SOUTH 16'44'08" EAST 22.31 FEET; THENCE NORTH
35'06'04" EAST 5.27 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 56'1~'18" EAST 26.07 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 32'57'28" WEST 5.24 FEET; THENCE NORTH 74'53'10" EAST
38.71 FEET;' THENCE NORTH 75'04'08" EAST 44.82 FEET TO A POINT ON
THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 6; THENCE ALONG SAID
SOUTHEASTERLy LINE, SOUTH 25°25'25" WEST 7.~2 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
SAID PARCEL "A" CONTAINS .067 ACRES MORE OR LESS
SEE EXHIBIT "C" ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART
HEREOF.
PARCEL "B" - TCSD LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE'EASEMENT WITHIN
PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAy
THOSE PORTIONS OF LOTS "A" AND "B" OF TRACT NO. 23267-4, IN THE
CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS
RECORDED IN BOOK 236, PAGES 21 THROUGH 24 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF
THE COUNTY RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEASTERLy CORNER OF LOT 6 DF SAID TRACT NO.
23267-4, SAID POINT ALSO BEING ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF LOT "B" OF
SAID TRACT; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 6 SOUTH
74'00'00" WEST 80.83 FEET TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 6;
THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLy LINE OP SAID LOT 6, NORTH 56°40'5~..
WEST 35.28 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT THEREIN, SAID POINT ALSO BEING A
POINT ON THE EASTERLY LINE'OF SAID LOT "A" OF SAID TRACT; THENCE
ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINEm NORTH 16'36°45" WEST 242.02 FEET TO THE
NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT lO OF SAID TRACT; THENCE LEAVING SAID
EASTERLY LINE DF SAID LOT "A", NORTH 73'23'17" WEST 6.00 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 16°36'45" EAST 242.02 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 58'48°23"
EAST 59.11 FEET; THENCE NORTH 74'00°00" EAST 84.16; THENCE NORTH
25'25'25" EAST 10.52 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 75°04'08" WEST 2.62 FEET TO
A POINT ON THE SOUTHEASTERLy LINE OF SAID LOT 6; THENCE ALONG SAID
SOUTHEASTERLy LINE, SOUTH 25'25'25" WEST 7.e2 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
SAID PARCEL "B" CONTAINS .041 ACRES MORE OR LESS.
SUBJECT TO ALL COVENANTS, RIGHTS, RIGHT OF WAY AND EASEMENTS OF
RECORD.
SEE EXHIBIT "C" ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART
HEREOF.
JN 225/08e 05/14/~5 I LB/S:Z
Engineers · Planners · : urveyors
5850 ~_~ Can~Lao Real Suite ~00
(6lg) 438 - 1210
~ ~ sve o
VICINITY IVlAP
NO SCALE
I INDICATES LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE
EASEMENT IN FAVOi20I= TCSD - PAI~CEL
(AI;2EA · 0.067 AC.)
[ ~.': .'?-l.',,:',%;[I IN:)ICATES LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE
EAS~ IN InAVOI~ OF TCSD WITNIN
PUBLIC I;21P=~IT-OF--WAY - PAI;2CEL "'B'
(AI~EA - O.O41 AC.)
2~
7 . ao
'~"?":?"":':" "'~,H ' '~ ~"j~~
:.;. '.".'.'.~'44'o8'w zz 3~' ~d "',
~ '. :. :. :': ". :.". ~94 'o0'oo-~ "86.5a" ."
.,. .... . ,, _.; ;,...... ],. ;; ... N25'25'ZS'E
VI ::LOT6 ~ POR~0N OF LOTS 6 ~ROUGH 10 AND
LOT A POQUITO
PORTIONS OF LOTS "A" AND "B" OF
TRACT NO. 23267-4, AS RECORDED
IN BOOK 236, PAGES 21 THROUGH 24
OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE
COUNTY RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF
RIVERSIDE
FXHIBIT "C"
TCSD4B.DWC
~car~.e.~ ~,~ reques~ oT aria re:urn ~;
ty Clerks Deparm~ent
;cy. of Terhecula
3174 Business Park Drive
=_mecula, CA 92590
R ' ECORDING
~i~E'RJ~ument is for the benefit of
:e L,,~ of Temecula and is entitled
be recorded without fee
.~ov~. Code 6103).
IRREVOCABLE OFFER TO DEDICATE
Parcel: Tract No. 23267-4
Lot llAND LOT A
Pr~ect: Old Vail Ranch
DR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged,
LLRK S. MORTON AND CARRIE M, MORTON, HUSBAND AN~ WIFE AS JOINT TENANTS
("Grantor'), hereby irrevocably offers to dedicate to the City of Temecula ("Grantee "), together
ith the' right to further grant or transfer the same to others, a perpetual easement and right-of-way for
aintaining, operating, altering, repairing, and replacing equipment and landscaping over and within the boundaries
that certain real property located in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, more particularly described in
:hibit "A" attached hereto, which is incorporated heroin by this reference (the "Easement Area").
GRANTEE, or its governmental entity, successors, or assigns, determines it is unable, incapable, or unwilling to
aintain said Easement Area, maintenance shall, after notice, become the responsibility of GRANTOR, with all
~venants and agreements of this easement extending to and becoming obligations of all heirs, executors,
!ministrators, successors and assigns of the GRANT~_~,,/<, '~ L~OP-,'~. - ltLPd< S. MORTON
- CARRZS MO ?0N
GRANTOR
~TED
.,'A._ OF CALIFORNIA
DUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
~ E-/~- ~_~ before me, the undersigned , A Notary Public in and for the State of California, personally
meared '~Ga/~' ~ ~ ~n/o- , personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of
:isfacto~ evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to ~e within instrument and
knowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his~er~eir a~horized caDaciW(ies), and that by
:/her/their signetS) on the instrument the person(s), or ~e e.d[y upon behalf of which the person(s) acted,
soured the instrument. ~ ~ ~ ...... ~ ~ ~ ~
< J. WEBB >
ITNESS my hand and official seal. ( NOT~Y~.~F~N~ )
~ OECO CO~W
~ ~ Co~. ~=ees June 3. 1994 >
CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE
is to certify that the interest in real property conveyed by the within Irrevocable Offer To Dedicate to the City of
~ecula, a political corporation and/or governmental agency, is hereby a_c~__pted by order of the City Council the date below
the Grantee consents to the recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer.
June S. Greek. City Clerk
~-ne/ir~ev .dad O13112
EXHIBIT "A" /~
PARCEL "A" - TCSD LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE EASEMENT
THAT PORTION OF LOT 11 OF TRACT NO. 23267-4, IN THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS RECORDED IN
BOOK 236, PAGES 21 THROUGH 24 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY
RECORDER OF T;IE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF LOT 11 OF TRACT NO. 23267-
4; THENCE ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT, NORTH 16'5&'43" WEST
98.52 FEET TO THE MOST WESTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT; THENCE ALONG
THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT, NORTH 28'23'01" EAST 20.00 FEET
TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 11, SAID POINT ALSO BEING ON THE
SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF STATE HIGHWAY 79; THENCE ALONG SAID
NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 11, NORTH 73'23'17" EAST 2.48 FEET TO
THE MOST NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 11; THENCE ALONG SAID
NORTHEASTERLY LINE, SOUTH 55'04'48" EAST 51.66 FEET; THENCE LEAVING
SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE, SOUTH 48'58'13" WEST 44.12; THENCE SOUTH
16'21'07" EAST 57.70 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 11;
THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE, NORTH 81'25'24" WEST e.21 FEET TO
THE POINt OF BEGINNING.
SAID PARCEL "A" CONTAINS 0.051 ACRES MORE OR LESS.
SEE EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART
HEREOF.
PARCEL "B" - TCSD LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE EASEMENT WITHIN PUBLIC
RIGHT-OF-WAY.
THAT PORTION OF LOT "A" OF TRACT NO. 25267-4, IN THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS RECORDED IN
BOOK 256, PAGES 2i THROUGH 24 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY
RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF LOT 11 OF TRACT NO. 232~7-
4, SAID POINT ALSO BEING ON THE EASTERLY LINE OF LOT "A" OF SAID
TRACT; THENCE ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT "A", NORTH
1~'36'43" WEST 98.32 FEET; THENCE NORTH 28'25'01" EAST 20.00 FEET
TO THE MOST NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT "A"; SAID POINT ALSO
BEING ON THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF STATE HIGHWAY
THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT "A", SOUTH 73'25'i7"
WEST 8.48 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTHERLY LINE~ SOUTH 28'25'01"
WEST 16.48 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 16'36'43" EAST 100.80 FEET| THENCE
NORTH 75'23'17" EAST 6.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
SAID PARCEL "B" CONTAINS 0.01~ ACRES-MORE OR LESS.
SUBJECT TO ALL COVENANTS, RIGHTS, RIGHTS-OF WAY AND EASEMENTS OF
RECORD
SEE EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART
HEREOF.
JN. 225-089
05/19/95
GLB/SBE
LINE DATA
NO. BEARING
L1 N28'23'Ol'E
L2 N73'Z3'17'E
L3 N28,'23'01'1~
L4 N73'Z3'17'E
L5 N81'23'Z4'W
LG N73'23'17'E
,%
DISTANCE
20.00'
2.48'
1G.48'
G.OO'
q.2r
8.48'
I',J
·. INDICATES LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE
['"""" ' "J EASEMENT IN I=AVO~ OF TCSD
PAI;2CEL 'A' (AI2EA - O.O51 AC.)
I'~','..~.".."',',::'1 INDICATES LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE
EASEMENT IN I=AVOI~ OF TCSD WITHIN
PUBLIC I;21G,LFF~OI=-WAy. PARCEL 'B'
CROSBY
MEAD
BENTON
& ASSOCIATES
(AI:;EA - 0,016 ACJ
Engineers · Planners · :urveyors
5650 El Caxnlno Real Suit,
Carlshad, California 920(
(619) 438 - 1210
7
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE EASEMENT
PORTIONS OF LOTS 11 AND "A" OF
TRACT NO. 23267-4, AS RECORDED
IN BOOK 236, PAGES 21 THROUGH 24
OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE
COUNTY RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF
RIVERSIDE
EXHIBIT "B"
Recorded at request of an0 re~urn ~a:
CiD/C]erj<:s Depara-nent
Ci~ of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
F/-~E RECORDING
~ instrument is for the benef~ of
the Cit~/of Ternecula and is e,Lj~jed
to be recorded without fee
(Gov~_ Code 6103).
IRREVOCABLE OFFER TO DEDICATE
Parcel:TRACT NO. 26861-1
LOT 'A' AND
PARCEL MAP NO. 18993
PARCEL 2
Project:
DFED
FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, THE PEESL~'~ COEPANIES, A-CkLIFOB~IA COEeOt~ATION
("Grantor'), hereby irrevocably offers to dedicate to the City of Temecula ("Grantee "), together
with the' right to further grant or transfer the same to others, a perpetual easement and right-of-way for
maintaining, operating, altering, repairing, and replacing equipment and landscaping over and within the boundaries
of that certain real oropertY located in the City. of Temecula, County of Riverside, more particularly described in
Exhibit "A" attache~ hereto, which is incorporated heroin by this reference (the 'Easement Area"}.
"GRANTOR RESERVES THOS~ CERTAIN RIGHTS DESCRIBED ON EXHIBIT 'B" ATTACHED HERETO."
If GRANTEE, or its governmental entity/, successors, or assigns, determines it is unable, incapable, or unwilling to
maintain said Easement Area, maintenance shall,' after notice, become the responsibility of GRANTOR, with all
covenants and agreements of this easement extending to and becoming obligations of all heirs, executors,
administrators, successors and assigns of the GRANTOR.
SR. VICE PRESIDENT
L
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) s.s.
On ~'- ~? 0 --~_J before me the undersigned , A Notary Public in and for the State of California, personally
appeared __'~-f ..q..,~l~ ~. ~ ~~ , personally ~own to me (or proved to me on the basis of
sadsfacto~ evidence) to be the person(s)whose name(s) is/are subscribed to ~e within in~ment and
acknowledged to me that he/she/they exec~ed ~e same in his~er~eir a~o~sd .~paci~(ies), and that by
his/her/their signetS) on the ins~ment the person(s), or ~e e,~L~ upon behalf of which the person(s) a~ed,
executed the instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
(~ OFFICIAL SEAL
< NANCY J. WEB
( 0 Ally PUBUC - CAUFO!INIA
( N ~ SAN DIEGO C0tJNIY 9 My C0mm. E=~ire$ Ju~ 3, 1
Signature
CERTIFICATE OF ACCEFFANCE
This is to cerdf~ mat the interest in real property conveyed by the within Irrevocable Offer To Dedicate to me City of
Temecula, a political corporation and/or governmental agency, is hereby a__r~_gted by order of the City Council the date below
and the Grantee consents to the recordorion thereof by its duly authoffzed officer.
Date
June S. Greek, City C..Jerk
0131B2
~r. ffwmsllnev,ded
EXHIBIT "B"
TO
IRREVOCABLE OFFER TO DEDICATE
Grantor hereby reserves for Itself and COUNTRY GLEN CONDOM INIUM
ASSOCIATION, a California nonprofit mutual benefit corporation ("Association") the right,
but not the obligation, to plant flowering plants within the Easement Area. The party who
exercises this right shall be responsible for the maintenance of the flowering plants and their
removal or replacement when appropriate or at such time as the Grantee requests removal.
Grantee shall have no obligation to maintain, remove or replace any plants placed in the
Easement Area by Grantor's or the Associatlon's exercise of this right.
5/5/93
"EXHIBIT "A"
PARCEL "A" - TCSD LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE EASEMENT
THAT PORTION OF PARCEL 2 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 18993, IN THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS RECORDED IN
BOOK 134, PAGES 13 THROUGH 18 OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE
COUNTY RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF LOT "A" OF TRACT NO.
26861-1 , AS RECORDED IN BOOK 236, PAGES 25 THROUGH 27 OF MAPS, IN
THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, SAID
POINT ALSO BEING ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 2 OF SAID
PARCEL MAP NO. 18993; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID
PARCEL 2, SOUTH 73'23'17" WEST 22.98 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID
NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 2; SOUTH 16'36'43" EAST 20.00 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 67'38'32" EAST 59.58 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY
LINE OF SAID LOT "A" OF SAID TRACT NO. 26861-1; THENCE ALONG SAID
WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT "A", NORTH 15'37'50" WEST 38.06 FEET TO
THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT "A"; THENCE ALONG SAID
SOUTHWESTERLY LINE, NORTH 67'38'32" WEST 30.86 FEET THE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
SAID PARCEL "A" CONTAINS 0.036 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
SEE EXHIBIT "C" ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART
HEREOF.
PARCEL "B" - TCSD LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE EASEMENT WITHIN
PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY
THAT PORTION OF LOT "A" OF TRACT NO. 26861-i, IN THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS RECORDED IN
BOOK 236, PAGES 25 THROUGH 27 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY
RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF LOT "A" DF SAID TRACT NO.
26861-1; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT "A", NORTH
73°23'17" EAST 9.54 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTHERLY LINE, SOUTH
67'38'32" EAST 26.37 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 15'57'50" EAST 40.99 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 74'22°10. WEST 6.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY
LINE OF SAID LOT "A"; THENCE ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE, NORTH
15'37'50" WEST 58.06 FEET TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT;
THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE, NORTH 67'38'32" WEST 30.86
FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
SAID PARCEL "B" CONTAINS 0.009 ACRES MORE OR LESS.
SUBJECT TO ALL COVENANTS, RIGHTS, RIGHTS OF WAY AND EASEMENTS OF
RECORD.
SEE EXHIBIT "C" ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART
HEREOF.
JN 225-B9
5-19-93
GLB/SBE
~ ~,O~:ESS| ~ P~ION PCL 2 PJVL NO. 18995
PJVt I,~/1;18
LEGB'~D
I.'.'.-'.'.'1
"~ TRACT NO. 28287
VICINITY MAP u.8. 240/29-35
NO SCALE
CROSBY EnZineers · Planners · Surveyors
~EA~) 5650 El Camino Real Suite 200
BE~N'TOI~T Carl,bad. CaUfor~a 92008
· SSOCIATI:S (619) 438 - 1210
-.7-- LINE DATA
NO. DEALING DISTANCE
L1 H73'?.3'17'E q.54'
L2 NG7'38'32'W 2G.37'
L3 N!5'37'50'W 40.qq'
L4 N74'22'10'E G.OO'
L5 N15'37'50'W 35.OG'
LG NG7'38'32'W 30.8G' ~q
Z ~4
INDICATES LAr,,DSCAPE MAINTENANCE
EASEA4ENT IN I=AVO120P TCSD - PA12CEL 'A'
(.A~EA - 0.036 ACJ
INDICATES LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE
EASEMENT IN I=AVO120I= TCSD WITHIN
PUBLIC 121C~L-IT-OI=-WAY - PA12CEL 'El'
(A12EA - 408.89 S/= Oi2 O.OO9 AC.)
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE EASEMENT
A PORTION OF PARCEL 2 OF PARCEL MAP
NO. 18993 RECORDED IN BOOK 134 PAGES
13 THROUGH 18 OF PARCEL MAPS, AND A
PORTION OF LOT "A" OF TRACT N0.26861-1
RECORDED IN BOOK 236 PAGES 25-27 OF
MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF COUNTY
RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE.
EXHIBIT "C"
43174 Business Park Dnve
Temecula, CA 82590
FREE RECORDING
This instrument is for the benef~ of
the CiD/of Temecula and is e,:Liijed
IRREVOCABLE OFFER TO DEDICATE
Parcek TRACT NO. 26861-1
LOTA
Project: COUNTRY GLEN
FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby aci~owledged, THE PEESLEY C0~LNIES, A C~LIFORN~A COEBO~TION
(" Grantor'), hereby irrevocably offers to dedicate to the City of Temecula (" Grantee "), together
with the' right to further grant or transfer the same to others, a perpetual easement and right-of-way for
maintaining, operating, altering, repairing, and replacing equipment and landscaping over and within the boundaries
of that certain real property located in the City. of Temecula, County of Riverside, more particularly described in
Exhibit "A' attached hereto, which is incorporated heroin by this reference (the 'Easement Area").
"GRANTOR RESERVES THOSE 'CERTAIN RIGHTS DESCRIBED ON EXHIBIT 'B' ATTACHED HERETO"
If GRANTEE, or its governmental entizy, successors, or assigns, determines it is unable, incapable, or unwiiling to
maintain said Easement Area, maintenance shall, after notice, become the responsibility of GRANTOR, with all
covenants and agreements of this easement extending to and becoming obligations of all heirs, executors,
administrators, successors and assigns of the GRANTOR.
,
G R
DATED
GERAL~ P. NORDEMAN
SR. VICE PRESIDENT
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
C, AITY OF RIVERSIDE ) s.s.
aDpeared ~;2~//r-c~{~_ , personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of
satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s} is/are subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged to me that he/she/they execLrced the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(lee), and that by
his/her/their signaturo~) on the instrument the person(s}, or the e,,i;iy upon behalf of which the person(s) acted,
executed the instrument..
WITNESS my hand and official'seal.
Signature
CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCIi
7his is to certify that the interest in real promercy conveyed by me wilhin Irrevo~ble Offer To Dedicate to the Cit~/of
7emecula, a political corporation and/or governmental agency, is hereby ac=Zoted by order of l~he Cky Council the date below
end the Grantee consents to the recordazion thereof by its duly authorized officer.
June S. Greek, City CDe~
O13112
EXHIBIT "B"
TO
IRREVOCABLE OFFER TO DEDICATE
Grantor hereby reserves for Itself and COUNTRY GLEN CONDOMINIUM
ASSOCIATION, a California nonprofit mutual benefit corporation ("Association") the right,
but not the obligation, to plant flowering plants within the Easement Area. The party who
exercises this right shall be responsible for the maintenance of the flowering plants and their
reinoval or replacement when appropriate or at such time as the Grantee requests removal.
Grantee shall have no obligation to maintain, remove or replace any plants placed in tits
Easement Area by Grantor's or the Associatlon's exercise of this right.
5/5/93
EXHIBIT "A"
PARCEL "A" - TCSD LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE EASEMENT
PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY
WITHIN ~ C!V|~ ~
THAT PORTION OF LOT "A" OF TRACT NO. 26861-1, IN THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS RECORDED IN
BDDK 256, PAGES 25 THROUGH 27 DF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY
RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF LOT "A" OF SAID TRACT NO.
26861-1; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLy LINE OF SAID LOT "A", SOUTH
67°38'32" EAST 50.86 FEET TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT "A";
THENCE ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT "A", SOUTH i5'57'50"
EAST 38.06 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNINGI THENCE SOUTH
15°37'50" EAST 21.23 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A 165e.00 FOOT RADIUS
CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLy; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF
SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 07'09'58" A DISTANCE OF
204.99 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT "A", ON
A LINE RADIAL TO SAID CURVE, NORTH 67°12'12'' EAST 6.00 FEET TO THE
BEGINNING OF A 1655.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLYm AND
TANGENT TO SAID RADIAL LINE; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF
SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 07'09'58" A DISTANCE OF
204.24 FEET; THENCE TANGENT FROM SAID CURVE, NORTH 15°37'50" WEST
A DISTANCE OF 2i.23 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 74°22'10.. WEST 6.00 FEET TO
THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. ~
SAID PARCEL "A" CONTAINS .051 ACRES MORE OR LESS.
SEE EXHIBIT "C" ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART
HEREOF.
PARCEL "B" - TCSD LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE EASEMENT WITHIN
PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY
THAT PORTION OF LOT "A" OF TRACT NO. 26861-1, IN THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS RECORDED IN
BOOK 256, PAGES 25 THROUGH 27 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY
RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT "A" OF SAID TRACT NO.
26861-1; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID "LOT .... A",
NORTH 37'04'24" EAST 35.26 FEET TO A ANGLE POINT IN SAID LINE;
THENCE ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT "A", NORTH Oe'll'02"
WEST 9.68 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A 1561.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE
CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLy; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID
CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 17'21'41" A DISTANCE OF 475.00
FEET; THENCE TANGENT FROM SAID CURVE, NORTH 26'32'45" WEST 99.17 TO
THE BEGINNING OF A 1659.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY;
THENCE NORTHWESTERLy ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF 01'28'35" A DISTANCE OF 42.24 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID
WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT '"A", ON A LINE RADIAL TO SAID CURVE,
NORTH 64'55'55" EAST 6.00 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A 1635.00 FOOT
RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY AND TANGENT TO SAID RADIAL LINE;
THENCE SOUTHEASTERLy ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF 01'28'56" A DISTANCE OF 42.09 FEET; THENCE TANGENT FROM
SAID CURVE, SOUTH 26'52'45" EAST 99.17 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A
1567.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY; THENCE
SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE
OF 17'21'41" A DISTANCE OF 474.82 FEET; THENCE TANGENT FROM SAID
CURVE, SOUTH 09'1i'02" EAST A DISTANCE OF 12.25 FEET; THENCE SOUTH
37°04'24.. WEST 29.58 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID
LOT "A"; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE SOUTH 80'53'46" WEST 8.66
FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
SAID PARCEL "B" CONTAINS .091 ACRES MORE OR LESS.
SUBJECT TO ALL COVENANTS, RIGHTS, RIGHTS OF WAY AND EASEMENTS OF
RECORD.
SEE EXHIBIT "C" ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART
HEREOF.
J.N. 225-O89/5-24-95/GLB-SBE
VICINITY MAP
NO SCALE
LINE DATA
NO. BEARING DISTANCE
L1 N74'22'lO'E
L2 NG7'12'12'[ OR) G.O0'
L3 H37'O4'24'E 2q.55'
L4 NG4'55'53'~ ~R~ G.O0'
L5 HOq'll'O2'W ~2.25'
LEGEND
EAS~ IN I=AVOI;2 OF TCSD WITI-IIN
PUBLIC ~IC--~--rT-OF-WA¥
t"PA~CEL "A' - O.O3,1 ACJ
(PAI;2CEL 'B' - O.O91 AC.)
CROSBY ~-agmeez~ · Plam~ez~ · sune:~oz~
~]~,~LD 5850 .~1 carolrio Real Suite 200
BENTON Car~sbaa. Ceubrn~a ~ooe
& ~OCLtTIS (eig) 438 - ~2f0
b
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE EASEMENT
PORTIONS OF LOT "A" OF TRACT
NO. 26861-1 RECORDED IN BOOK 236
PAGES 25-27 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE
OF COUNTY RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF
RIVERSIDE.
EXHIBIT "C"
43] 74 Business rarK Drive
Yemecula, CA 92590
FREE RECORDING
This instrument is for the benefit of
me City of Temecula and is e,dded
to be recorded without fee
(Gov~. Code 6103).
IRREVOCABLE OFFr--.R TO DEDICATE
Parcel: TRACT NO. 23267-1
LOTS 28 THROUGH 32 AND
LOTS "A", "B" AND "G"
--~
Project: OLD VAIL RANCh
FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, · .THE PRESLEY COMPANIES, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATTn~
(" Grantor"), hereby irrevocably offers to dedicate to the City of Temecuja (" Grantee "), together
with the' right to further grant or transfer the same to others, a perpetual easement and right-of-way for
maintaining, operating, altering, repairing, and replacing equipment and landscaping over and within the boundaries
of that certain real property located in the City of Temecuta, County of Riverside, more particularly described in
Exhibit "A" attached hereto, which is incorporated herein by this reference (the 'Easement Area").
"GRANTOR RESERVES THOSE' CERTAIN RIGHTS DESCRIBED ON EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO."
If GRANTEE, or its governmental entity, successors, or assigns, determines k is unable, incapable, or unwilling to
maintain said Easement Area, maintenance shall, after notice, become the responsibility of GRANTOR, with all
covenants and agreements of this easement extending to and becoming obligations of all heirs, executors,
administrators, successors and assigns of the GRANTOR.
RA TOB
G N
0- c,v.m LD P. NORDE N
SR, VICE PRESIDENT
DATED
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) s.s.
appeared J//J4 Q , personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of
satisfactory evidence} to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capaciry(ies), and that by
hislherttheir s'ignaturo~) on the instrument the person(s), or the e,,rjLy upon behalf of which the person(s) acted,
executed the instrument.
WITNES~ my hand and official seal.
CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE
This is to certify that the interest in real property conveyed by the wiffiin Irrevoc-.ble Offer To Dedicate to the City of
Temecula, a political corporation and/or governmental agency, is hereby accepted by order of the City Council the date below
~nd the Grantee consents to the recordadon thereof by its duly authorized officer.
Date
June S. Greek. City Caerk
013,
EXHIBIT "B"
TO
IRREVOCABLE OFFER TO DEDICATE
Grantor hereby reserves for itself and BRIDLEVALE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION,
a California nonprofit mutual benefit corporation ("Association") the right, but not the
obligation, to plant flowering plants within the Easement Area. The party who exercises this
right shall be responsible for the maintenance of the flowering plants and their removal or
replacement when appropriate or st such time as the Grantee requests removal. Grantee
shall have no obligation to maintain, remove or replace any plants placed in the Easement
Area by Grantor's or the Association's exercise of this right.
Grantor hereby further reserves in favor of the Association the right and the obligation
to maintain the Pergola monumentation improvement located within the Easement Area.
The approximate location of the Pergola is shown on Exhibit "C" to this Exhibit "B".
,-""" 5~5~93
EXHIBIT "A"
PARCEL "A" - LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE EASEMENT
THOSE PORTIONS OF LOTS 28 THROUGH 52 OF TRACT NO. 25267-1, IN THE
CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS
RECORDED IN BOOK 255, PAGES 29 THROUGH 55 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF
THE COUNTY RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 52 OF TRACT NO. 25267-1,
SAID POINT BEING ON A 517.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHERLY,
A RADIAL LINE TO SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 2'54'01" EAST; THENCE
ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 52, WESTERLY ALONG T~E ARC OP
SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 06°49'01-A DISTANCE OF 57.72
FEET; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE AND TANGENT TO
SAID CURVEm SOUTH 86'05'00" WEST 107.41 FEET TO THE NORTHWESTERLY
LINE OF SAID LOT 52; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID
LOT 52, SOUTH 40°51'54.. WEST 16.41 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID
NORTHWESTERLy LINE, SOUTH 87'09'44" EAST 78.17 FEET; THENCE SOUTH
71'09'40" EAST 57.02 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 16'59'1~" EAST 57.77 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 24°55'42.. EAST 57.41PEET; THENCE SOUTH 14'15'20" EAST
54.12 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 15'51°15.. EAST 62.58 FEET; THENCE SOUTH
17'05'47" WEST 50.01 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 17'09°46" WEST 56.27 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 16°50'41" WEST 56.45 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 17°52'29.. WEST
56.07 FEET: THENCE SOUTH 46'07'54" WEST 15.50 FEET TO A POINT ON
THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF LOT 28 OF TRACT NO. 25267-1; THENCE ALONG
SAID SOUTHERLY LINE, NORTH 85'17'14" EAST 26.92 FEET TO THE
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 28; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHEASTERLY
LINE OF SAID LOT 28 AND LOT 29 OF SAID TRACT, NORTH 28'49'29"
EAST 154.71 FEET TO THE MOST EASTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 29; THENCE
ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 29 AND LOTS 50, 51 AND 52 OF
SAID TRACT, NORTH 16'58'44" WEST 251.91 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
SAID PARCEL "A" CONTAINS 0.427 ACRES MORE OR LESS.
SEE EXHIBIT "C" ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART
HEREOF.
PARCEL "B" - LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE EASEMENT WITHIN PUBLIC
RIGHT-OF-WAy
THOSE PORTIONS OF LOTS "B" AND "G" OF TRACT NO. 25267-1, IN THE
CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS
RECORDED IN BOOK 255, PAGES 29 THROUGH 55 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF
THE COUNTY RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 52 OF TRACT NO. 23267-1,
SAID POINT ALSO BEING DN THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF LOT "B" OF SAID
TRACT AND DN THE ARC OF A 317.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE
SOUTHERLY, A RADIAL LINE TD SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 2'54'01" EAST;
THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY ~INE DF SAID LOT "B", WESTERLY ALONG
THE ARC DF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE DF 06°49'01" A
DISTANCE OF 57.72 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY
LINE, TANGENT TO SAID CURVE, SOUTH 86'05'00" WEST 107.41 FEET TO
THE MOST NORTHERLY CORNER DF SAID LOT 52, SAID CORNER ALSO ON THE
EASTERLY LINE DF SAID LOT "G"; THENCE ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF
SAID LOT "G" OF ISAID TRACT, SOUTH 40'51'54" WEST 16.41 FEET;
THENCE LEAVING SAID EASTERLY LINE DF SAID LOT "G", NORTH 49'28'26"
WEST 5.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 40'31'34" EAST IB.51 FEET; THENCE
NORTH 86'05'00" EAST 109.51 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A 322.00 FOOT
RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHERLY; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE ARC DF
SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 06'50'06" A DISTANCE DF 56.54
FEET TO THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID TRACT NO. 25267-1;
THENCE ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE, SOUTH 16°58°44.. EAST 5.50 FEET TD
THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
SAID PARCEL "B" CONTAINS 0.019 ACRES MORE OR LESS.
SUBJECT TO ALL COVENANTS, RIGHTS, RIGHTS OF WAY AND EASEMENTS OF
RECORD.
SEE EXHIBIT "C" ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART
HEREOF.
EXHIBIT "A"
PARCEL "C" - LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE EASEMENT WITHIN PUBLIC
RIGHT-OF-WAy
THAT PORTION OF LOT "A" OF TRACT NO. 23267-1, IN THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS RECORDED IN
BOOK 235, PAGES 2~ THROUGH 33 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY
RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT "A" OF SAID TRACT NO.
23267-1; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT "A", NORTH
28°4e'2e'' EAST 154.71 TO THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID TRACT;
THENCE ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE, SOUTH 16'38'47" EAST 8.42; THENCE
LEAVING SAID EASTERLY LINE, SOUTH 28'4~'2~" WEST 144.53 TO THE
SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT "A"; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE,
SOUTH 83'17'14" WEST 7.37 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
SAID PARCEL "C" CONTAINS 0.021 ACRES MORE OR LESS.
SUBJECT TO ALL COVENANTS, RIGHTS RIGHTS OF WAY AND EASEMENTS OF
RECORD. '
SEE EXHIBIT "C" ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART
HEREOF.
JN 225-8e
5-14-e3
GLB/SBE
tcsduntl.lgl
LOT
VIA__CO~DOBA .
-- ' CL. ,,.~. Nos'~'oo'W.C~.
.....: ~:":":~ .~' ~,c.~6'~:.bp :,". '. ~ .o 7..i~.....
<" 32
"~g~ 31
· ..A
30 'Z"'%'17~O
LEGEND 29
I'.'.'.'.'.' .] ~.~c~s ~sc~ ~~c~ ~. ,%.
~ASB~_NT ,N ~AVO~ O~ ~CSD 0.O,~:.~
PARCEL 'A' - (A~EA- O.4~7 ACJ
CROSBY
MEAD
BENTON
& ~ssoc~m
INDICATES LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE
EASEMENT IN FAVOI~ OF= TCSD WITI-IIN
PUBLIC I;2JGI-IT-OF-WAy
PAI2CEL "B' - (AI2EA-815.23 S.F. OI;2
O.OI9 AC.)
.O
PAI2CEL 'C' - (AI;2EA- 897.74 S.F. OI;2
AI~EA-O.O21 AC.)
hi'.lG'3(
NI53'17'14'I~ $
TRACT NO, 23083-2
M,Bo 220/30-88
o
VICINITY MAP
NO SCALE
Engineers · Planners · ,'r~lrveyors
5650 E1 Camino Real, Suite '-'00
Carlsbad. California
(ei9) 438 - :2zo
;--,b
~ ~bb
~ .
~ ~ oo
3'17'14'E 0
7.37'
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE EASEMENT
PORTIONS OF LOTS 28 THROUGH 32 AND
PORTIONS OF LOTS "A", "B", AND
OF TRACT NO. 23267-1. AS RECORDED
IN BOOK 235, PAGES 29 THROUGH 33 OF
MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY
RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
EXHIBIT "C"
TCSD1A.DWG
CZ~, Clerks DeparLmen=
C]~/of Temecuia
-L'-- 174 Business Park Drive
Te.mecula, CA 92590
FREE RECORDING
7'~ insrrumem: is for l~e benef-n: of
· , £iry of Ternecula and is enLided
to be recorded without fee
{Gcv~. Code 61
IRREVOCABLE OFFER TO DEDICA~
Parcel: TRACT NO. 23267-L
LOTS I THROUGH 5 AND
LOTS "A" A~ND "B"
Projec:: OLD VAIL RANCH
FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, recsilx of which is hereby acknowledged, . THE PRESLEY COMPANIES, A GALIFORNIA CORPORATTnN
(" Grantor" ), hereby irrevocably offers to d~di~t~ to me Cjry of Temecula (" Grantee "), together
wi~h the' right to further grant or transfer the same to others, a perpetual easemotto and right-of-way for
maintaining, operating, altering, repairing, and replacing ea. uipmenl: and landscaping over and within the boundaries
of ~hat certain real erepercy located in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, more par-jcularly described in
E_~hibit "A" armche~4 hereto, which is incorpo;ated heroin by this reference (the 'Easement Area").
"GRANTOR RESERVES THOSE' CERTAIN RIGHTS DESCRIBED ON K~RIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO."
[f GRANTEE, or its governmental entity, successors, or assigns, dL-mrminss k is unable, incapable, or unwiiling to
maintain said Easement Area, maintenance shall, after notice, bec:me ~he responsibility of GRANTOR, with all
covenants and agreemenT3 of this easement extending to and becoming obiigadons of all heirs, executors,
administrators, successors and assigns of the GRANTOR.
DATED
FrE OF CALIFORNIA )
GERA' ,D P. NORDEMAN
SR. VICE PRESIDENT
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) S.S.
On J'- 2 o - ~'_~ ~_ef~. e~he ndersigned , A No~a~ Pubic in and fo~'~e Sate of California. personally
appeared ~ ~ ~~~ , personally ~own to me (or proved to me on the basis of
sa~sfacta~ evidence) to be ~e person(s) whose name(s) ~t~ ~bs~bed to me wi~in in~rument and
ac~nawledaed to me that he/she/they executed ~e same in his~eir a~o~sd ca~acj~(ies), and that by
his/her/thai; s'ignat~) on ~e inst~ment the person(s), or ~e endLy upon behalf of which ~e person(s) acted,
NAH J. WEBB >
W~ESS my hand and official seal. ( NOTW~C,~fm · )
Signature ~ · ~ ~ ....... ~ .... ~ ·
CER~BCATE OF AC~~C~
This is to csm~ ~t ~e intere~ in real DroDe~ conveyed by ~e ~ lnevo~ble Offer To Dedicate to ~e Ci~ of
TemecuJs. a poii~c~t co~o~don and/or govemmenBl agsnct, is he~ a~ by order of ~e Ci~ Council ~he da~e below
and ~e Grsntee c~nsenB =o ~e recordsdon ~ereof by i~ duly a~o~ ~r.
June S. Greek. C/cy Cle~
EXHIBIT "B"
TO
IRREVOCABLE OFFER TO DEDICATE
Grantor hereby reserves for itself and VERANDA AT BRIDLEVALE HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION, a California nonprofit mutual benefit corporation ("Association") the right,
but not the obligation, to plant flowering plants within the Easement Area. The party who
exercises this right shall be responsible for the maintenance of the flowering plants and their
removal or replacement when appropriate or at such time as the Grantee requests removal.
Grantee shall have no obligation to maintain, remove or replace any plants placed in the
Easement Area by Grantor's or the Association's exercise of this right.
s/5/93 ~
ITEM NO.
4
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
DAVID F. DIXON
JUNE 8, 1993
TEMECULA TEEN RECREATION CENTER STATUS REPORT
PREPARED BY: (~ HERMAN D. PARKER, RECREATION SUPERINTENDENT
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors:
Receive and file the Temecula Teen Recreation Center Status Report.
DISCUSSION: The Temecula Teen Recreation Center continues to operate
six (6) days per week offering Temecula teens a wide variety of recreational
opportunities. The Teen Center hours of operation are Monday through Thursday
from 2:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m., Friday from 2:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. and Saturday from
11:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. When local schools are not in session, the Teen Center
opens at 11:00 a.m. during the week. Youth ages twelve to eighteen years of age
can participate in activities ranging from scheduled craft classes or teen dances to
drop-in video games or billiards.
The Temecula Teen Council, which is an ad-hoc committee comprised of Temecula
teenagers, meets twice a month at City Hall to discuss with staff, and assist in
implementation of the types of activities teens desire. Types of activities offered at
the Teen Center include Wood Burning, Pizza Nights, "Evening at the Movies," Ping-
Pong Tournaments, Pool Tournaments, Birthday Parties, Karaoke, Parent-Teen Pool
Tournaments, Halloween Costume Contests, Fund Raising Projects, Raging Waters
and Magic Mountain Trips, Tutoring Programs, counseling, dances, art classes, and
several drop-in activities. '
Attendance at the Teen Center varies depending upon the season, the weather, and
/~- 4DHGENDxiSITEENIP,.pT.,4GN
06O893
the time of day. In general, attendance figures increase during the summer months
and decrease during the school year, especially during the cold winter months. Our
overall registered membership figures total approximately 610 local teens. The Center
attracts approximately 44 teens on a daily basis, and 1,010 teens on a monthly basis.
The majority of the teens that utilize the Teen Center are between the ages of 12 and
16 years of age.
Teen Center programs and activities are publicized in the City's recreation brochure,
which is directly mailed to all Temecula residents, by flyer distribution to the middle
schools and high schools, and by local radio.
The future continues to look bright for the teens of Temecula. Staff and Teen Council
members are committed to working together to enhance the recreational opportunities
for Temecula's teenagers.
At the completion of the new Community Recreation Center (CRC), the present teen
program will shift to the CRC. Staff anticipates a greater number of program
participants due to the central location of the CRC in relation to local schools and
residential zoning.
Attached are flyers of some activities and events that have been offered through the
Teen Recreation Program.
FISCAL IMPACT: Costs to provide teen recreation services are included in the
TCSD Community Services, Parks and Recreation budget.
4DL4GENDASXTF,~..4GN 060893
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPAR~
FEST 993
SLIMY O-LYMHCS
Saturday, March 20, 1993
9:00 a.m. - 2:00 p.m.
If you like "Double Dare * or *What Would You Do?" You'il love .Slimy Olympics. This is your chance
to come to Tomecub Middle School" and watch teens and community professionals compete in crazy,
messy, sloppy, slimy olympic games. Teams. will be represented by the Temecuh Police Department,
Temecula Fire Services, Temecuh Valley Unified School District, and the City of Temecula.
"Temecula Middle School is located at 42075 Meadows Parkway, Temecuh.
Help your favorite team WIN BONUS POINTS!
Each team wffi have an area designted just for them. Represented by different colon, the team
that has the most specmton during the BONUS RALLY wffi get extra points! If there is a tie,
the team with the most spirited spectators wins!
BONUS RALLY IS AT 11:00 a.m.
BONUS AREAS:
Police Department
· Fire Services
School District
City of Temecula
If you should have any questions, please
Department at 694-6480 or 694-6410
North F_.nd of Field·
South End of Field
East End of Field
West End of Field
call City of Temecula,
Community Services
SEE YOU THERE!!
City of Tamecuts
Community Services Department
TEIViEC A
TEEN- FEST 93'
N~PRO~ FOR DI~'RiIRION
Tl~s ADproval Cloes not ~mD|y
an enOorsement of ms actwhy.
TEMECULA VAJ. LEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DIST.
3ecause the City of Temeo,lq thinks very highly of. the teem in this
:ommtmity, an entire week has been devoted to Temecnla'Teenst On Friday
~tarch 19, 1993, the festivities'will be kicked-off'with a dance ~md continu~
hrough Sunday, March 28, '1993. The weeks events are as follows:
Friday, March 19
Saturday, March 20
Monday, March 22
Tuesday, March 23
Wednesday, March 24
Thursday, March 25
Friday, March 26
Saturday, March 27
Teen Fest Dance
Teen olympics
Bar-B-Que Fest
Temecula's "Teens In Action"
Photo Contest and Temeeula's
Teen Logo and Slogan Contest
Teen Career Day
Carnival Begins'
Carnival Time
Carnival Time
IA~CATION
Teen Center
Temecula Mlddi~ School'
Teen Center
Teen Center
Teen Center
Sam Hicks Park
Sam Hicks Park
Sam Hicks Park
.. Sunday, March 28Carnival Ends Sam Hicks Park
,. r--:-:..~,. :......-
,.: . :. ,,,',~-=.::.;,,.,,.'~;;'.'~:~""'-"'~":,',,.,' ..
II · it · · · f'.
CITY OF ~MECULa
COMMUNi'IT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
JOBS
JOBS
APPROVED FOR DISTRIBUTION
This APProval does not imply
an endorsement of this activity,
TE:MECULA VALLEY UNIFIED ~CHOOL DI~I'.
AND MORE JOB S !
IF YOU WANT A SUMMER JOB
COME TO THE TEMECULA TEEN CENTERr
If you are loola'ng for a job, maybe we can help! Along with the State Employment
Development Department, teens can come to the Teen Center and complete an applican'on and
staff will try to match each teen with their ideal summer job.
ALl. TEMECULA TEENS (Ages 14 - 21)
WHEN:
MONDAY AND WEDNESDAY
2:00 P.M. - 7:00 P.M.
TEMECULA TEEN RECREATION CENTER
28780 FRONT STREET - SUITE D-4
(OLD TOWN AREA)
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT ROSITA OR JAIME AT 694-6410
' ~ CITY OF TEMECUL~
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTAIENT
.~,,,.~-
HA LLO WEEN COSTUME CON1 IrEST
AND
PARTY
WHO?
TEMECULA TEENS - AGES 12-18
WHEN?
TH~AY, OCTOBER 29, 1992
WHAT :lIME?
6:00 P.M. - 9:00 P.M.
HOW MUCH?
$1. O0 PRE-Sdr. F
$ 2. O0 AT THE DOOR
WHERE ?
TEEN RECPdF,4IION CENTER
28780 FRONT STREET
SUITE D-4
PRIZES FOR THE FOLLOWING COSTUMES..
THE MOST GORY COSTUME A WARD
THE MOST REALISTIC A WARD
THE MOST ORIGINAL A WARD
THE "LOOKS JUST LIKE" A WARD
THE '7 'M PRETTY" A WARD
THE "OHH UGLY" AWARD
THE MOST CREA TfVE A WARD
MOST ORIGINAL COSTUME FROM "AROUND THE WORLD"
MOST ORIGINAL COSTUME FROM "OUTER SPACE"
THE MOST BL4HHH: A WARD
PIZ7~t .50 CENTS PER SLICE - SODAS .50 CENTS EACH
FOR MORE INFORMAlION PLEASE Cz~l.r, 694-6480 OR 694-6410
APPROVED FOR DISTRIBUTION
This Approval does not imlDly
an endorsement of this activity.
rEA~ECULA VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DIST.
Tnts APProval cloes not imply
C12'Y OF TEMECr, fI.,4 an endorsement of this activity.
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMEN']' , TEMECU LA VALLEy UNIFIED SCHOOL DIST.
"TAKE ME 0 UT TO
THE B A L L GAME" "'
FRIDAY, JULY 10, 1992
SAN DIEGO PADRES vs. PHII,tDELPHIA PHILLIES
For TEENS: ages 12 - 18 years of age
ONLY $14.00
Come and spend the evening with the San Diego Padres as the play agahtvt the Philadelphia Phillies. lt's PRKIW T-SHIWr
NIGHT, so bring your friends and be prepared for a whole.lot of fun! Den't forget extra spending money for hot dogs, peanuts,
and souvenirs.
Bus transportation will depart & return to the Temecula Teen Recreation Center, located at 28780 Front Sweet:
BUS LFA~ ILT 8.~0 A.M. AND RETURNS AT 6.~0 P.M.
Registration & general permission forms are now being accepted at City Hall, 43174 Business Park Dffve in Temectda, Monday
through Friday from 8:00 a. tn. to 5:00 p.m. For more information, please call 694-6480.
DFADLlYE ID REGISTER 1S FRIDAY- J'VLY 3, 1992
..... cut here-
Activity:
Date:
Departure Time:
Fee:
..................... cut here ......................
CITY OF TEMECULA
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
GENERAL PERMISSION FORM
San Diego Padre Baseball Game
July 10, 1992
5:00 p.m.
$ 14.00
Transportation: Bus
Approximate Return:
12:00 Midnight
I, the parent/legal guardian of , hereby expressly and irrevocably consent
to the participation of in the Community Services activity of PADRE GAME described above.
LIABILITY WAIVER
I realize every precaution is taken to eliminate any injuries or hazards and a competent supervisor is present; however, in the
event of an injury, I hereby waive, release and hold harmless from any liability for damages for personal injury including
accidental death, as well as from claim for property damage which may arise in connection with the above named activity,
against the supervisor, the CITY OF TEMECULA, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers. I further permit the use of
activity/event photography and/or video for media promotion.
In case of accident or other emergency. personnel of the Temecula Community Services Depalb,ent and/or its agents are
hereby authorized to secure medical care deemed necessary as a result of accident or injury for the participant. I further agree
to pay any and all costs incurred as a result of said treah,ent.
~ lture of Parent/Guardian:
Date:
Print Name:
Phone:
NOTICE: REFUNDS WILL NOT BE GIVEN UNLESS TRIP IS CANCn rn
CJTY OF T~M~CU'La
COM~IUNITY SERVICES DEPAR~14ENT
SCHOOL'S- OUT
BEACH
Y, JUNE. 19, 1992 PROVEO FOR DISTRIBU ON
For ~ENS: ages 12 - 18 ye~ of age This Approval does not imply
O~Y $7.00 an endorsement of this activity.
TEMEGU~ VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DIST.
~o ~ys a~ school's o~, we ~e gong w M~n B~ ~ ~ ~go.
~ere w~ be ple~ of s~, s~ shops ~ f~l ~te ~ea ~so btd~es bumper can, a carousel and the
infamous G~ ~pper Roller Co~er. So, get yoF ~e~ topper, bring a towel, su~n loHon, lunch and
c~ spe~g monq* too/
Bus transportation will depart & return to the Temecula Teen Recreation Center, located at 28780 Front Sweet:
BUS LEAVES A.T 8:00 A,M. AND RETURNS AT' 6:00 P.M.
Registration & general permission forms are now being accepted at City Hall, 43274 Business Park Drfve in
Temecula, Monday through Friday from 8:00 a. rn. to 5:00 p.m. For more information, please call 694-6480.
DEADLIYE TO REGIS1ZR 18 MONDAY - JUNE 15, 1992
-cut here-
..................... cut here ......................
CITY OF TEMECULA
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
GENERAL PERMISSION FORM
Acl~viW: School's Out Beach Trip
Date: June 19, 1992
Deoar~re Time: 8:00 a.m.
Fee: $ 7.00
Transportation: Bus
Approximate Return: 6:00
to the pardcil3ation of
theparent/legal guardian of , hereby expressly and irrevocably consent
in the Community Services acl~vity of BEACH TRIP described above.
L!ABILITY WAIVER
I realize every precaution is taken to eliminate any injuries or hazards and a competent supervisor is present; however, in the
event of an injury, I hereby waive, release and hold harmless from any liability for damages for personal injury including
accidental death, as well as from claims for property damage which may arise in connerdon with the above named acl~vity,
against the supervisor, the CITY OF TEMECULA, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers. I further permit the use of
activiTy/event photography and/or video for media promol~on.
In case of accident or other emergency. personnel of the Temecula Community Services Depa, b,ent and/or its agents are
hereby authorized to secure medical care deemed necessary as a result of accident or injury for the participant. I further agree
to pay any and all costs incurred as a result of said trea~nent.
--=nature of Parent/Guardian: Date:
Print Name: Phone:
NOTICE: REFUNDS WILL NOT BE GIVEN UNLESS TRIP IS CANCgl
, --,- MAGIC UNTAIN
APPROVED FOR DISTRIBUTION
This APprovaJ does not irapry
an endorsement of this activity.
TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DIST.
SATURDAY, MARCH 28, 1992
For TEENS: ages 12-18 years of age~
ONLY $14.00
(a savings of over $10.00r) -
Enjoy a day of unlimited use of over 100 tides, live shows and adventure including: PSYCLONE, COLOSSUS, NINJA,
TD)AL WAVE and VIPER,"**'
Bus tramporta~on will depart & return to Ranabe California Sports Park parking lot, located at 42775 Margarita Road:
Buses depart from T, :_ so:- 11.-00 am.
Buses return to T~ x I,: 12.'00 midnight
Registration & general permission forms are now being accepted at City Ha!l, 43174 Business Park Drive in
Monday through Friday from 8:00 am to S:00 pm. For more information, please call 69ki-6~.
DEADT-EqE TO REG~ IS W~D~Ay - MARCH 18
- - -cut here ...................... cut here .................
CITY OF TEMECULA
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
GENERAL PERMISSION FORM
Six Rags Magic Mountain Excursion
March 28, 1992
11:00 am
$14.00
A~v~:
Date:
Departure Time:
Fee:
Transportslion: Bus
Approximate Return: 12:00 Midnight
to the participation of
above.
the parentllegd guardian of
,hereby expressly end irrevocably consent
in the Community Sarvicts activity of MAGIC MOUNTAIN described
LIABILITY WAIVER
I realize every precaution is taken to eliminate any injuries or hazards end · competent supervisor is present; however, in the
event of an injury, I hereby wive, riouse and hold harffdess from any liability for damages for persend injury including
accidental death, as wall as from claims for property damage which rney wise in connection with the above named ecliviW,
against the supervisor, the CITY OF TEMECULA, its officers, agents, ampleyeas end volunteers. I further peffnit the use of
activity/event photography end/or vii for media promotion,
In case of accident or offier emergency, personnd of the Tamocul8 Community Services Dep&'l,,,ent end/or ira egerrts ere
hereby authorized to secure medical care deemed near es a result of accident or injury for the participant. I further agree
pay any end il costs incurred as a result of said lrk~,,,ent.
$'~turo of Parent/Guardian:
Date:
Print Name: Phone:
ITEM
NO.
5
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
FROM:
DAVID F. DIXON, CITY MANAGER
DATE:
JUNE 8, 1993
SUBJECT:
NAMING OF CITY PARK SITES
PREPARED BY:
RECOMMENDATION:
SHAWN D. NELSON, COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR
That the Board of Directors:
Consider, and if desired, approve official names for a 28.6 acre community park
adjacent to Pala Road, a I acre park site in the Presley Development, a 9 acre park
site in the Presley Development, and a 9 acre park site in the Paloma Del Sol
Development.
DISCUSSION: The park site on Pala Road is an approximate 28.6 acre
community park located north of Pala Road and west of Loma Linda Drive. On March
23, 1993, the Board of Directors approved the name "Pechanga Park" for this site
with the stipulation that the name be approved by the Tribal Council of the Pechanga
Indians. After contacting the Tribal Council, staff received a letter stating that the
council objected to the City using the name "Pechanga Park" because this name may
be used in a future park to be developed on the indian reservation.
On April 12, 1993, the Community Services Commission recommended the name
"Pala Community Park" for the park site on Pala Road to the Board of Directors for
consideration. Staff has received a letter from the Pala Band of Mission Indians
approving that the City use the name "Pala Community Park."
Subsequent to this recommendation, staff has received several requests from
members in the community to name the park site on Pala Road after Kent Hindergart,
the Temecula Police Officer killed in the line of duty on May 9, 1993. Requests have
also been received to name the park after Kent Hindergart and Allison Jacobs, the
woman who was also killed during this tragic event.
On May 1 O, 1993, the Community Services Commission recommended the following
names for the remaining park sites:
Presley site (1 acre):
Presley site (9 acre):
John Magee Park
Vail Ranch Park
3. Paloma Del Sol site (9 acre):
Paloma Del Sol Park
The Commission recommended the name John Magee Park because Mr. Magee was
the first postmaster in the Temecula Valley area and established the area's first store
called the Butterfield Stage Stop; Vail Ranch Park was recommended because this
park site is located on the old Vail Ranch property; and Paloma Del Sol Park was
named because it is located within the Paloma Del Sol Specific Plan.
According to the existing naming policy, the Board of Directors may approve these
recommended names or consider any other names desired.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
ATTACHMENTS:
Letter dated April 29, 1993 from Pala Band 'of Mission Indians
Resolution No. CSD 92-08: Naming Parks and Recreation Facilities
Commission agenda reports of May 10 and April 12, 1993
Pala Band Of
Mission Indians
P.O. Box 43
Pals, California 92059-0043
(619) 742-3784
[,lAY 0 ,.$1993
COMMi%JY SERVICES
Amril 29, 1993
City cf Temecula
~ommunity Services Oepartme~+
43174 Business Park Drive
'remecuia,, California 92590
Dear Shawnr
The Pale ~and of Indians and I thank you arld >'our depa'rtment for taking t. hs
time to consider and involve the P.~la Band in the naming of "Pale Community
Park",
Let l't be known that the Pals Band cf Indians apprc~,e 'the name "Pala Communily
Park" at lhe site on Pala RoaS.
If you would llke Myself or a ~e:.-es ntati'~e o'.F +~
ded',cation of the Park, plea con't hesitate to contact
~gair, thank you 'for >'our: iCe'ration.
F: r P ",
R o i t h .
Cha27man/CEO
PBM!
Tr'ibe to atter:d 'the
;he at (619) 7<2-378~.
RHS/shm
RESOLU~ON NO. CSD 92-08
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF THE TEMECLrLA COMMUNITY SERVICES
DISTRICT ADOPTING A POLICY FOR NA~MZNG
PARES A/NI) RECREATION FACILITIES
WHEREAS, on April 23, 1991, the Board of Directors (the "Board") adopted a poticy
for naming parks and recreation faciliti~; and
WI:rRREAS, the Community Services District and the Parks and Recreation Commission
requests that the aforementi6ned policy be adopted by resolution;
NOW, Tw'F~REFORE, TR'K BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF TEE TEIVfECULA
COA,LMUNI~ SERVICES DISTRICT DOES FEREBY, RESOLVE, DETERN~'qE AND
ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the policy for naming parks and recreation facilities ~s set forth on
Exhibit "A" is adopted establishing a uz,-iforrn poticy and procedure t,hat identifies criteria for
the naming of parks and recreation facilities.
PASSED, APPROVED ANI) ADOPTED this 8th day of September, 1992.
P, onald J. Parks, President
ATTEST:
C~--\ ' <~~;~-/_/
Iane,~/Greek, City ~
~AL]
g=sos CSD 92-08
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TE1VIECULA )
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temeeula, I--IF-REBY DO CERTIFY that the
foregoing Resolution No. CSD 92-08 was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council
of the City of Temecula on the 8th day of September 1992 by the following roll call vote.
AYES: 5 DIRECTORS:
Bird~ll, Moore, Lindemans, Mu~oz
Parks,
NOES: 0 DIRECTORS: None
ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None
(,j~une S. Greek, C'.n,y/Clerk
Rcsos CSD 92-08
Tr,. EECULA CONL Cu.' UTY SERVICES DISTR/CT
Naming Parks and Recreation Facilities
PUkPOSE
To eszab!ish a uniform policy and procedure that identifies
criteria for t~he naming of parks and recreation faci!iZies.
POLICY
The Park and Recreation Commission will be responsible for the
se!eczion of names for parks and recreation facilities. Once a
name is selected, iz will be forwarded %o the Board of Direcoors
for raZificauion. Staff will be responsible for encouraging
cilizens and community organizations to suggest possible names that
will then be forwarded to the Commission for consideration.
A= a minimum, each park and. community building will be designated
a name. Naming of specific areas within a park (garden, swirling
pool, lake, ballfield, etc.) is accepzab!e but should be kept to a
minimum ~o avoid confusion. No park shall be given a name which
might be perceived as controversial by the commmnizy. All names
se!ec%ed shall be accep~ab!e and meaningful zo a majority of the
neighborhood/community where the park or recreation facility is
!oca~ed.
Priorit1' in naming sites shall be given to geographical !eca~ions,
historic significance or geologic features. No park shal!.'be named
for a person, exceoz where an individual has made a significanz
financial contribution ~oward the acquisiiicn and/or deve!opmen~ of
zne park or faciii=y, or has been an ou=szanding long-time
cc~r. uni~y leader who has supported open space and recreamiona!
ac=ivimies.
ALl park and recreation faci!izies will be designated a formal name
wi=hin six months of acqfuisition or conszruc=ion. All parks shall
have an entrance sign. Buildings will have an entrance sign and a
miaque inside zhe facility for name identification.
The name of a park or recreation facility may be changed only after
a hearing is held by the Commission to receive community input and
direc=ion. No name shall be changed unless there is significant
justification and suppor~ by the co~muni~y.
RESPONSiBILITY ACTION
Depar=men=
Parks and
Recreation
Commission
D apartment
Ac~,--uires a new park cr recreazicn
faci!izy.
Solicits possible names from community',
Forwards suggested names to'the Parks and
RecreaZion Commission for ccnsidera:ion.
Receives any additional community inpu:.
Selects a name for the new park or
recreation faci!iZy.
Forwards name
raZification.
to City Council for
installs the appropriate naminq sign or
plaque.
//
<
0
'O
cO
Q
D.
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
AGENDA REPORT
COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION
SHAWN D. NELSON ~c~
MAY 10, 1993
NAMING OF PARKS AND RECREATION FACILITIES
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Community Services Commission:
Approve names to be recommended to the Board of Directors for the Senior Center,
Community Recreation Center, two park sites in the Presley Development, and one
park site in the Paloma Del Sol Development.
DISCUSSION: Pursuant to the City's naming policy,'it is the responsibility
of the Community Services Commission to forward recommendations concerning the
official name of each park and recreatioa facility operated by the City of Temecula.
Due to the several facilities that will be completed in the near future, it is
recommended to address the official names of these facilities so proper signage can
be approved as part of the development process and familiarity with the park can
begin to be established with the community.
Concerning the recreation buildings, the following names are recommended:
1. Old Town Temecula Senior Center
2. Community Recreation Center
Concerning the parks, a location map of City park sites and a listing of suggested park
names have been attached for your review and ~ssistance. A request has been made
by Kernper that the park site in Paloma Del Sol be named Paloma Del Sol Park. It is
requested that the Commission recommend names to the following:
1. Nine (9) acre park in the Presley Development.
2. One (1) acre park in the Presley Development.
Nine (9) acre park in the Paloma Del Sol Development.
TO;
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
AGENDA REPORT
COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION
SHAWN D. NELSON
APRIL 12, 1993
NAMING OF THE PARK SITE ON PALA ROAD
RECOMMENDATION: That the Community Services Commission:
Consider, and if desired, approve.a name for the park site on Pala Road to be
forwarded to the Board of Directors for consideration.
DISCUSSION: The park-site on Pala Road is an approximate 28.6 acre
community park located north of Pala Road and west of Loma Linda Drive. On March
23, the Board of Directors approved the name "Pechanga Park" with the stipulation
that the Pechanga Tribal Council approv. ed this name as well.
On March 26, 1993, the City received a letter from the Pechanga Tribal Council
objecting to the use of the name ,Pechanga Park" for the park site on Pala Road
because the Tribal Council wanted to reserve the right to use this name for a future
park planned within the Pechanga Indian Reservation.
Therefore, staff has provided for your review several recommendations from members
in the community regarding possible names for this park site. The following is a listing
of the names that staff has received to date:
1. Palomino Park
2. Cutting Horse Park
3. Wild Horse Park
4. Bronco Park
5. Cattle Drive Park
6. Vaqueros Park
7. Stagecoach Park
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
Wagon Wheel Park
Fort Temecula Park
Old West Park
Rodeo Ranch Park
Indian Park
Eagle Park
Eagle Ranch Park
Vineyard Park
Granite Park
Wolfe Valley Park
Bear Mountain Park
Rainbow Canyon Park
Ponderosa Park
Recreation Park
Earle Stanley Gardner Park
Karel Lindemans Park
Vail Ranch Park
The Commission may consider the above names or any other name desired for this
park site.
I have added the following names because they represent street names adjacent
to Presley "A" and Presley "B".
25. Corte Veranos Park (Presley "A")
26. Via Del Coronado Park (Presley "B")
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY
ITEM
1
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
MAY 11, 1993
A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency was called to order on
Tuesday, May 11,1993, 9:40 P.M., at the Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street,
Temecula California. The meeting was called to order by Chairperson Ronald J. Parks.
AYES: 5
AGENCY MEMBERS:
Birdsall, Mu~oz, Roberts, Stone,
Parks
NOES:
0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None
Also present were City Manager David Dixon, Assistant City Manager Woody Edvalson, City
Attorney F. Scott Field, City Clerk June S. Greek and Recording Secretary Gail Zigler.
PUBLIC COMMENT
None
AGENCY BUSINESS
Minutes
1.1 Approve the minutes of April 13, 1993.
It was moved by Agency Member Birdsall, seconded by Agency Member Mu~oz to
approve staff recommendation.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 5 AGENCY MEMBERS: -
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 0
AGENCY MEMBERS:
AGENCY MEMBERS:
Birdsall, Mu~oz ,
Parks
None
None
Roberrs, Stone,
Economics Research Associates (ERA Labor Force Study)
Assistant City Manager Woody Edvalson presented the staff report,
.~, RDAMIN5/11193 -1 - 5117/93
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES
MAY 11, 1993
Mayor Mu~oz expressed his disappointment with the staff report and questioned Mr.
Edvalson's efforts at contacting the resources the Mayor had suggested.
It was moved by Agency Member Birdsall, seconded by Agency Member Parks to
approve staff recommendation.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES:
4 AGENCY MEMBERS:
Birdsall, Roberts, Stone, Parks
NOES:
1 AGENCY MEMBERS:
Mu~oz
ABSENT: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None
Develooment and DisPosition Aoreement - Wal Mart Department Store
It was moved by Agency Member Stone, seconded by Agency Member Mu~oz to
continue this Item to the meeting of June 22, 1993.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 5 AGENCY MEMBERS:
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 0
AGENCY MEMBERS:
AGENCY MEMBERS:
Birdsall, Mu~oz ,
Parks
None
None
Roberrs, Stone,
Development and DispoSition Aareement - Professional Hospital SUDDIV
City Manager David Dixon presented the staff report.
Agency Member Mu~oz stated that he feels that considering the investment the City
is willing to make, Professional Hospital Supply should be willing to remain in Temecula
for a set period of time.
Agency Member Stone clarified that he is one hundred percent in support of
Professional Hospital Supply remaining in the community.
It was moved by Agency Member Birdsall, seconded by Agency Member Roberts to
approve staff recommendation as follows:
RDAMINS/! 1/93 -2- 5/17/93 ~
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES
MAY 11, 1993
4.1
Approve the Development and Disposition Agreement between the
Agency and Professional Hospital Supply, et.al., and authorize the
Agency Chairman to execute the same.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES:
4 AGENCY MEMBERS:
Birdsall, Roberts, Stone, Parks
NOES:
I AGENCY MEMBERS:
Mu~oz
ABSENT: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None
It was moved by Agency Member Stone, seconded by Agency Member Roberts to extend the
meeting to 11:00 P.M.
Loan to Quicksilver Enterorise. Inc.
Agency Member Birdsall stepped down due to a potential conflict of interest.
City Manager David Dixon presented the staff report.
It was moved by Agency Member Mu~oz, seconded by Agency Member Stone to
approve staff recommendation as follows:
5.1
Approve a $60,000 loan to Quicksilver Enterprises, Inc., and authorize
the Agency President to execute the attached Agreement in
substantially the form presented, subject to approval of the Agency
Executive Director and General Counsel as to the final form of the
Agreement.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 4
NOES: 0
AGENCY MEMBERS: -
AGENCY MEMBERS:
Mu~oz, Roberts, Stone, Parks
None
ABSENT: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None
ABSTAIN: 1 AGENCY MEMBERS:
Birdsall
Low Interest Loan/Business Incentive Proaram
City Manager David Dixon presented the staff report,
.,,/---- RDAMIN5/11/93 -3- 5/171~3
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES
MAY 11, 1993
Dan Atwood, Toyota of Temecula, 26631 Ynez Road, Temecula, expressed his
support of the loan program. Mr. Atwood advised that he is currently on the Board of
the Chamber of Commerce and can see the need for this program in the community.
Agency Member Birdsall stated that she would be in favor of a interest only payment
for the first year of the loan to allow the businesses to re-establish themselves.
Agency Member Stone stated that he supports the program and suggested that the
maximum loan amount be lowered from $150,000 to $100,000.
Agency Member Mu~oz .stated that he also is in support of the program and the
comments made by Agency Member Stone.
It was moved by Agency Member Stone, seconded by Agency Member Roberts to
approve staff recommendation with specific direction regarding the maximum loan
amounts to be awarded, allowing no more than four loans with a maximum of
$100,000 and five loans with a maximum amount of $50,000.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 5
AGENCY MEMBERS:
Birdsall, Mu~oz , Roberts, Stone,
Parks
NOES:
0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
None
AGENCY MEMBER'S REPORTS
Agency Member Birdsall and Agency Member Stof~e volunteered to participate on the loan
review committee.
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Agency Member Birdsall, seconded by Agency Member Stone to adjourn at
10:30 P.M.
RDA MIN5/31193 -4- 5/17~93
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES
MAY 11.1993
The next regular meeting of the City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency will be held on
Tuesday, May 25, 1993, 7:00 P.M., at the Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street,
Temecula, California.
Ronald J. Parks, Chairperson
June S. Greek, City Clerk
~- RDAMINS/11/93 -5- 5/17/93
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
HELD MAY 25, 1993
A regular meeting of the Temecula Redevelopment Agency was called to order at 8:45 PM
in the Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Chairman Ronald J. Parks presiding·
PRESENT: 3 AGENCY MEMBERS: Birdsall, Mu~oz, Parks
ABSENT: 2 AGENCY MEMBERS: Roberts, Stone
Also present were Assistant City Manager Harwood Edvalson, General Counsel Scott F. Field
and Agency Secretary June S. Greek.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None given.
AGENCY BUSINESS
Combining Balance Sheet and Statement of Revenues. Exoenditures and Changes in
Fund Balance for the Nine (9) Months Ended March 31, 1993
It was moved by Agency Member Birdsall, seconded by Agency Member Mu~oz to
approve staff recommendation as follows:
1.1
Receive and File Report.
The motion was unanimously carried, with Agency Members Roberrs and Stone
absent.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
No report given.
GENERAL COUNSEL'S REPORT
None given.
AGENCY MEMBERS REPORTS
Member Birdsall requested that staff pursue the request by former City Councilmember Karel
Lindemans that the City attempt to have the limitations on the Redevelopment Agency's Tax
Increment Revenues increased.
4\RDAM]N~052593
~-~"' -1- 05/28/93
Temecula Redevelopment Aiency Minutes
ADJOURNMENT
May 25. 1993
It was moved by Agency Member Birdsall, seconded by Member Mufioz to adjourn to a
meeting to be held at the Temecula Community Center on June 8, 1993. The motion was
unanimously carried with Agency Members Roberts and Stone absent.
Ronald J. Parks, Chairperson
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk/Agency Secretary
4\P-DAM]N\052593 - -2- 0S/28/93 "%'