HomeMy WebLinkAbout041393 CC AgendaAGENDA
TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
A REGULAR MEETING
TEMECULA COMMUNITY CENTER - 28816 PUJOL STREET
APRIL 13, 1993 - 7:00 PM
At approximately 9:45 PM, the City Council will
determine which of the remaining agenda items
can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00
PM and may continue all other items on which
additional time is required until a future meeting.
All meetings are .scheduled to end at 10:00 PM
EXECUTIVE SESSION: 5:30 PM :- Closed SesSion of the City Council pursuant to
Govemment Code Section 54956.9 (b) regarding Potential litigation, 54957.6 regarding
:la~r::::ne.gotiations and 54956.8 regarding acquisition of real property'(RanCho West
Apartments located at Pujol and' Main Streets). =
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. 93-08
Resolution: No. 93-29
CALL TO ORDER:
Mayor J. Sal Mufioz presiding
Invocation
Dr. Stephen Struikmans, Rancho Community Church
Flag Salute
Councilmember Parks
ROLL CALL:
Birdsall, Parks, Roberts, Stone, Mufioz
PRESENTATIONS/
PROCLAMATIONS
Presentation to Riverside & Temecula Firefighters (Rainbow Fire)
Presentation to CDF/Riverside Ranger Unit (Flood)
Presentations to "Get a Grip" Committee
Building Safety Week Proclamation
Community Services Month
PUBLIC FORUM
This is a portion of the City Council meeting unique to the City of Temecula. At the
meeting held on the second Tuesday of each month, the City Council will devote a
period of time (not to exceed 30 minutes) for the purpose 'of providing the public with
an opportunity to discuss topics of interest with the Council. The members of the City
Council will respond to questions and may give direction to City staff. The Council is
prohibited, by the provisions of the Brown Act, from taking any official action on any
matter which is not on the agenda. If you desire to speak on any matter which is not
listed on the agenda, a pink 'Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with
the City Clerk.
For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak' form must be filed with the City Clerk
before the Council gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual
speakers.
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be
enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless
members of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent
Calendar for separate action.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Standard Ordinance Adootion Procedure
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions
included in the agenda.
2
3
Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve the minutes of March 16, 1993;
2.2 Approve the minutes of March 23, 1993.
Resolution ADorovino List of Demands
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
,Aeelda/041393
04~7~3
4
Citv Treasurer's Reoort
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Receive and file the City Treasurer's report as of February 28, 1993.
6
City Comments on the Reauest by the Native American Observer Training Association
to Transfer the Site of the Village of Temeku to the Bureau of Indian Affairs
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-7
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
DETERMINING THAT THE TRANSFER OF 17.97 ACRES OF LAND FROM THE
NATIVE AMERICAN OBSERVERS ASSOCIATION TO THE BUREAU OF INDIAN
AFFAIRS TO ENSURE THE PROTECTION OF THE SITE OF THE VILLAGE OF
TEMEKU WILL NOT HAVE AN ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE CITY OF TEMECULA
Consideration of Take-Over Aareement with Indemnity Insurance Comoanv of
California to Comolete the I-15 Widenina Project. PW 91-04
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1
Approve in substantiality the form presented the Agreement between
the City of Temecula and the Indemnity Insurance Company of California
requiring Indemnity to complete the 1-15 widening project for their
Principal, Oliver Brothers and authorizing the Mayor to execute the
Agreement on the City Council's behalf and the City Clerk to attest
thereto.
7
Park View Property Acauisition Financino Terms
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1 Approve the revised financing terms for the acquisition of the Park View
property.
/"" /4e~de/041383 3 04/07/13
8
9
10
Traffic Signals. Four-Way STOP at Avenida Barca and Maroarita Road
RECOMMENDATION:
8.1
The Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommends that the City Council
include the construction of a traffic signal at the intersection of Avenida
Barca and Margarita Road in the FY 93-94 Capital Improvement
Program;
8.2
As an interim measure, adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ESTABLISHING "STOP" SIGNS
Release Material and Labor Bond in Tract No. 21764
RECOMMENDATION:
9.1
Authorize the release of material and labor bond for sewer system
improvements in Tract No. 21764, and direct the City Clerk to so advise
the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors.
Acceot Public Imorovements in Tract No. 23160
RECOMMENDATION:
10.1
Accept the public improvements in Tract No. 23160; authorize the
reduction of Faithful Performance, Street and Sewer and Water System
Securities; Accept the Subdivision Warranty Bond; Approve the
Subdivision Agreement Rider, and Direct the City Clerk to so advise the
Clerk of the Board of Supervisors.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before a public
hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the
approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the
projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or
someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondences
delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing.
393 4 04/07/93 ~ "~'
11 Amendments to the Ordinance Regulatino Temoorarv Signs
12
RECOMMENDATION:
11.1
Uphold the Planning Commission's recommendation and deny the
amendments to the Ordinance Regulating Temporary Signs, Ordinance
92-16.
An Uroencv Ordinance of the Temecula Citv Council Establishing Regulations for the
Use of Outdoor Advertising Disolavs
RECOMMENDATION:
12.1
Adopt an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 93-
AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS FOR THE USE OF OUTDOOR
ADVERTISING DISPLAYS
12.2 Introduce an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 93-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS FOR THE USE OF OUTDOOR ADVERTISING
DISPLAYS
COUNCIL BUSINESS
13 Community Services Fundinq Reeuest Recommendations
RECOMMENDATION:
13.1 Review and approve or revise Ad Hoc committee recommendations in
response to applications received from community services groups.
14 Boys and Girls Club Project
(Continued from the meeting of 3/23/93)
RECOMMENDATION:
14.1 Consider request from the Boys and Girls Club to approve a loan of
$51,000 for Phase I Improvements of the Boys and Girls Club Project to
be repaid with service-programming hours at a rate of $1.05 per child
per hour.
6 04/07/93
AOefda/041393
15
Addition to Anti-Graffiti Ordinance
(Continued from the meeting of 3/23/93)
RECOMMENDATION:
15.1 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 93-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADDING
SECTIONS 6.14.304 THROUGH 6.14.308, INCLUSIVE, TO CHAPTER 6.14 OF
THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO GRAFFITI
16 Low Interest Loan/Business Incentive Program
(Continued from the meeting of 3/23/93)
RECOMMENDATION:
16.1 Continue to the meeting of April 27, 1993.
17 Soeed Undulations
RECOMMENDATIONS:
17.1 The Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommends that the City Council
consider the adoption of a policy governing the installation of speed
undulations in residential neighborhoods in Temecula.
CITY MANAGER REPORT
CITY ATTORNEY REPORT
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT
Next meeting: April 20, 1993, 7:00 PM, General Plan Public Hearing, Temecula
Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California
Next regular meeting: April 27, 1993, 7:00 PM, Temecula Community Center, 28816
Pujol Street, Temecula, California
/l~/xle/o4 1313 e 04/07/13
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MELTING - (To be held at 8:00)
CALL TO ORDER:
President Patricia H. Birdsall
ROLL CALL:
DIRECTORS:
Mufioz, Parks, Roberts, Stone, Birdsall
PUBLIC COMMENT:
Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors, should
present a completed pink "Request to Speak" to the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state
your name and address for the record.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of March 23, 1993.
2
Construction of 115 Kv Transmission Line bv Southern California Edison Alono
Maroarita Road
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1
Grant Southern California Edison an anchor easement located at the
northwest corner of Margarita Road and Pauba Road within Sports Park,
in exchange for the release of an adjacent anchor easement to the City.
GENERAL MANAGERS REPORT - Dixon
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT - Nelson
BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT:
Next regular meeting: April 27, 1993, 8:00 PM, Temecula
Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California
~ AGendNN. 13e3
/ 7 04/07/13
TEMECULA REDFVELOPMENT A~ENCY' MEETIN~
CALL TO ORDER:
ROLL CALL:
Chairperson Ronald J. Parks presiding
AGENCY MEMBERS: Birdsall, Mur~oz, Roberrs, Stone, Parks
PUBLIC COMMENT:
Anyone wishing to address the Agency, should present a
completed pink 'Request to Speak" to the City Clerk. When you
are called to speak, please come forward and state VOLr name
and address for the record.
AGENCY BUSINESS
I Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1
Approve the minutes of March 23, 1993.
2
The Economics Research Associates (ERA) Labor Force Study
(Continued from the meeting of 3/23/93)
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1
Continue to the meeting of April 27, 1993, allowing staff and the Mayor
to discuss alternative methods of obtaining the desired information.
Resoonse to Reouirements of SB 617
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1
Authorize the Finance Officer to forward the attached correspordence
to the County of Riverside regarding the payment of tax increrrent to
the Education Revenue Augmentation Fund (ERAF").
4 Resolution of Intention to Purchase Rancho West Apartments
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 93-
A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF TEMECULA,
CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE PREPARATION OF A BONA FIDE OFFER TO
PURCHASE CERTAIN PROPERTY AND AFFIRMING THE AGENCY'S
COMMITMENT TO MEET LOWER-INCOME REQUIREMENTS OF THE
RESOLUTION TRUST CORPORATION'S AFFORDABLE HOUSING DISPOSITION
PROGRAM
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
AGENCY MEMBER'S REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT: Next regular meeting: April 27, 1993, 8:00 PM, Temecula
Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California
-"' ~ /IOendN041393 e 04/07/93
PRESENTATIONS/
PROCLAMATIONS
The City of Temecula
PROCLAMATION
WHEREAS, the month of April is designated as Community Services Month; and
WHEREAS, most citizens of California's cities take advantage of the Community
Services system; and
WIIFJH;'.~.S, Community Services are vital to good physical and mental health and
enhance the quality of life for all people; and
WHEREAS, all citizens can enjoy self-renewal in the use of Community Services, i.e.,
libraries, arts programs, recreation, museums, green spaces and parks facilities; and
WHEREAS, the City of Temecula recognizes that the efforts of the professional
Community Services workers have enhanced the services available to City residents;
NOW, THEREFORE, I, J. Sal Mu~oz, on behalf of the City Council of the City of
Temecula, hereby proclaim the month of April, 1993 to be
"COMMUNITY SERVICES MONTH"
and urge all citizens to enjoy their City Community Services programs and honor those who
have contributed to enhance them.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City
of Temecula to be affixed this 231h day of March, 1993.
J. Sal Mu~oz, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
The City of Temecula
PROCLAMATION
WItEREAS, from the inception of this nation, it has been the responsibility of the states
and their local governments to adopt legislation and enforce laws and ordinances whenever
necessary to protect their citizens' health, welfare and safety; and
WHEREAS, among the most basic of the laws and ordinance which have been so
derived are those acts which assure the public's health and safety in the buildings in which
people live, work and plan; and
WHEREAS, to assure such safety, the State of California, working together and in
conjunction with the counties and cities across the state, enforces a uniform statewide building
code which has been designed and is maintained with the assistance of the building industry and
the consumers; and
WHEREAS, it is through the untiring efforts of state and local building officials and
their cooperative relationship with the construction industry that the administration of these
health and life-saving regulations is assured.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, J. Sal Mu~oz, on behalf of the City Council of the City of
Temecula, hereby proclaim the week of April 12-16, 1993, to be
"TEMECULA BUH~r}ING SAFETY WEEKs
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City
of Temecula to be affixed this 13th day of April, 1993.
J. Sal Mu~oz, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
ITEM
NO.
ITEM
NO.
MINUTES OF AN ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, MARCH 16, 1993
An adjourned regular meeting of the City of Temecula City Council was called to order on
Tuesday, March 16, 1993, 7:25 P.M., at Vail Elementary School, 29915 Mira Loma Drive,
Temecula, California, Mayor Sal J. Mufioz presiding. Mayor Pro Tem Roberrs led the flag
salute.
PRESENT: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Parks, Roberts, Stone,
Mufioz
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Also present were City Manager David Dixon, Assistant City Manager Woody Edvelson, City
Attorney Scott Field, City Clerk June S. Greek and Minute Clerk Gail Ziglero
INVOCATION
The invocation was given by Pastor Gary Ruly, HIS Church Christian Center.
PUBLIC COMMENT
Lee Bellino, 42430 El Camino Place, Temecula, stated his opposition to the proposed Wal
Mart project coming to Temecula. Mr. Bellino stated that he feels a Wal Mart store in
Temecula would lead to an increase in traffic congestion, and robbery and crime from
outsiders.
Kevin McKenzie, 40551 La Colima, Temecula, advised the Council that the Meadowview
Homeowners Association has discovered an existing tract map on file at the County showing
North General Kearney as a four lane road from Nicolas Road to Calle Madero. He asked for
direction from staff on how to handle this issue.
Director of Public Works Tim Serlet stated that there is a recorded tract map on file with the
County and the right-of-way has been offered and accepted for dedication. Director Serlet
stated that he would like to have the time, to look at the map as a whole, to study the effects
on public safety before vacating that portion of North General Kearney.
COUNCIL BUSINESS
1. Coooerative Aqreement with the City of Murrieta
City Manager David Dixon presented the staff report outlining a preliminary cooperative
sales tax agreement between the City of Temecula and the City of Murrieta. City
CCMIN03116/93 -1- 3/26/93
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES March 16, 1993
Manager Dixon explained that the purpose of the sales tax agreement is to discourage
developers of large retail box users from having cities compete with each other for
their business. The proposed Sales Tax Agreement would provide the City entering
into a deal with a large retail box user of 100,000 square feet or more, 75% of the
sales tax revenues with 25% of the sales tax revenues shared with the other city.
City Manager Dixon advised that the City of Murrieta would be discussing the
agreement at a special meeting tonight, but would not be voting on anything until their
next meeting.
City Attorney Scott Field explained two versions of the agreement 1 ) a sales tax
agreement, with a 75/25 share of sales tax revenues or 2) a no incentives program.
City Attorney Field stated that the agreement could be entered into by the
Redevelopment Agencies of both cities or after voter approval.
Mayor Mu~oz explained the purpose of the proposed sales tax agreement between the
Cities of Temecula and Murrieta is to eliminate competition between the two cities,
when securing new "big box" retail users. Mayor Mur~oz added that a two year time
limit has been placed on the agreement in the event that either City is not satisfied
with the results.
Councilmember Parks expressed strong opposition to the proposed sales tax
agreement. Councilmember Parks stated that he feels the City of Temecula has
everything to lose and the City of Murrieta has everything td gain with this proposal
and suggested that Temecula assist the City of Murrieta by directing money towards
the improvement of Jefferson Avenue.
Councilmember Stone said that he feels the proposed resolution will be the first step
in reversing the dangerous trend of cities using public money to encourage big sales
tax generators to come into their communities. Councilmember Stone stated that he
feels the tax sharing is a very innovative program.
Councilmember Parks stated that the City of Temecula will have to offer incentives if
they want a mall in the community.
Mayor Pro Tem Roberrs stated that he feels that the proposed agreement is a positive
step toward working with the City of Murrieta.
Mayor Mur~oz advised that in discussions with the City Manager and Mayor of the City
of Murrieta, they expressed they would be encouraging their City Council to adopt a
similar sales tax agreement.
Councilmember Birdsall questioned why the City of Temecula was proposing to pass
a resolution when the City of Murrieta will not be voting on the resolution for another
two weeks.
CCMINO3/16193 -2- 3/26193
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES March 16.1993
Mayor Mu~oz stated that both the Murrieta City Manager and Mayor have expressed
an interest in the agreement. Mayor Mu~oz advised that the agreement would not go
into effect until both cities have entered into the same agreement.
It was moved by Councilmember Stone, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Roberts to
approve adoption of a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-22
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA,
DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ENTER INTO A SALES TAX SHARING AGREEMENT
WITH THE CITY OF MURRIETA
contingent upon the City of Murrieta taking the same action.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES:
3 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Roberts, Stone, Mu~oz
NOES: 2 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Parks
Reauest to the Governor's Office of Plannina and Research for an Extension of Time
to Complete the PreParation and AdoPtion of the City General Plan
Director of Planning Gary Thornhill presented the staff report outlining the request for
an extension of time to complete the preparation and adoption of the City General
Plan.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Roberrs to
authorize City staff to request a 90 day extension of time to complete the General Plan
and Adopt a Resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-23
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA,
CALIFORNIA, REQUESTING A 90-DAY SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME TO
ADOPT A CITY GENERAL PLAN, PURSUANT TO SECTION 65361 OF THE
CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE.
The motion carried as foNows:
AYES:
5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Parks, Roberts, Stone,
Mur~oz,
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
~ CCMIN03/16/93 -3-
/ 3/26193
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES March 16, 1993
Mayor Mu~oz declared a recess at 8:25 P.M. The meeting reconvened at 8:35 P.M.
PUBLIC HEARING
City of Temecula General Plan, Imolementation Proqram, Environmental Impact Reoort
and Mitigation Monitorina Program
Senior Planner John Meyer presented the staff report and advised the Council that
following the Council's action on Calle Medusa and North General Kearney Road, staff
reviewed the circulation plan and recommends an additional road segment be added,
which will parallel Highway 79 South between Jedediah Smith and Margarita Road.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Stone to approve
the addition of a 78' right-of-way from Jedediah Smith to Butterfield Stage Road.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Parks, Roberts, Stone,
Mu~oz
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Mayor Mu~oz opened the public hearing at 8:45 P.M.
Terri Gassen, 44501 Verde Drive, Temecula, representing the Los Ranchitos
Homeowners Association, expressed concern for traffic safety along Ynez Road. Ms.
Gassen asked for control of speed limits, weights of vehicles through Los Ranchitos
and consideration for the safety of equestrian riders. Ms. Gassen asked that the 50
MPH speed limit be reduced to 45 MPH.
Mayor Pro Tem Roberts advised that a sub-committee of the Public/Traffic Safety
Commission will be studying truck routes and weight limits on city streets. Mayor Pro
Tem Roberts agreed that the bike lanes pose a safety concern along that segment of
roadway.
John Moramarco, P.O. Box 906, Temecula, presented the Council with blue prints of
his parcel of land on Highway 79 South, along with copies of correspondence with Cal
Trans, Riverside County Transportation Department and the City of Temecula,
regarding the widening of Highway 79 South. Mr. Moramarco is requesting
ingress/egress on Highway 79 South, east of Bedford Court. Mr. Moramarco advised
that he will be requesting a zone change to commercial for his property, which he feels
is unsuitable for rural residential development because the widening of Highway 79
South will result in a reduction of lot sizes, and noise from the highway.
CCMIN03/16/93 -4- 3/26/93
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
March 16.1993
Director Serlet advised that the City has a MOU (memorandum of understanding) with
the County of Riverside which restricts the number of access points along Highway 79
South.
John Moramarco stated that in his conversations with Cal Trans, they have advised
him that ingress/egress is up to the city. Mr. Moremarco stated that he must have a
plan for the proposed commercial properties to present to the Los Ranchitos
Homeowners Association, however he cannot draw the plans until he gets approval
from the city for the access and zone change. Mr. Moremarco added that the access
on Highway 79 South would keep traffic generated from his property off of Valejo.
Director Serlet stated that the city would re-open the MOU and look at all access
points along Highway 79 South and Mr. Moramarco's request would be addressed
along with all the others.
John Meyer advised that there are several property owners along Highway 79 North
and Highway 79 South that have requested access.
John Moremarco requested a letter from the city stating that his request was under
consideration.
Planning Director Gary Thornhill reminded the Council that the recommendation from
the Planning Commission was that this property remain as 2 1/2 acre rural residential.
Mayor Mu~oz proposed that should the property be zoned commercial, the Council give
direction to staff to submit Mr. Moramarco's access request and all the other requests
along Highway 79 South, to determine where the most appropriate access points along
Highway 79 South should be. Mayor Mu~oz asked that staff provide Mr. Moramarco
with a set of the minutes.
Councilmember Birdsall questioned why the First Street bridge is planned as a two-lane
bridge, when it was shown during the January flooding that another bridge was
needed.
Bob Davis, of Wilbur Smith & Associates, advised that the bridge was planned for two
lanes based on other recommended improvements, including the Western Bypass
Corridor. Mr. Davis stated that once the other improvements are completed, a four-
lane bridge may not be needed.
1)
Draft Circulation Element
After review, the consensus of the Council was to approve finalization of the
Draft Circulation Element as presented.
./---~ CCMIN03/1 6193 -5- 3/26/93
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES March 16.1993
2) Draft Economic Develooment Element
Dennis Wambaugh, representative of Stanley R. Hoffman & Associates,
provided an overview of the Economic Development Element.
The consensus of the Council was approval of the Draft Economic Development
Element as presented.
3) Draft Public Safety Element
Senior Planner John Meyer presented the staff report.
After a review, the consensus of the Council was approval of the Draft Public
Safety Element.
Mayor Mu~oz declared a recess at 9:35 P.M. to change the tape. The meeting convened at
9:45 P.M.
4) Draft Noise Element
Senior Planner John Meyer presented the staff report.
Councilmember Stone questioned the noise impacts of the French Valley
Airport.
Karen Gulley explained that because the new landing plan for the French Valley
has not been completed, the impacts have not been evaluated.
After review, the consensus of the Council was to approve the Draft Noise
Element as presented.
5)
Draft Air Quality Element
Senior Planner John Meyer presented the staff report.
After review, the consensus of the Council was approve of the Draft Air Quality
Element as presented.
6)
Draft Housina Element
Senior Planner John Meyer presented the staff report.
Councilmember Parks stated that he would like this element continued to be
considered at the public hearing on the land use element.
-6- 3/26193
CCMIN03/16/93 ~
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES March 16.1993
Mayor Mur~oz asked about community input on this element of the General
Plan.
Karen Gulley explained that the public was not in favor of concentrated high-
density housing in the same area as is presently the site of this zoning.
7) Draft Communitv Desiqn Element
8) Draft Ooen Soace/Conservation Element
The overall consensus of the Council was to continue the Housing, Community Design
and Open Space/Conservation elements of the General Plan to the public hearing on
the Land Use element.
CITY MANAGER REPORT
None
CITY ATTORNEY REPORT
None
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
Councilmember Birdsall asked the Mayor to contact County Supervisor Bob Buster and ask
that the public input meeting regarding the flood control be delayed because it conflicts with
the public hearing scheduled for the Land Use Element of the City's General Plan.
,/~"' CCMIN03/16/93 -7- 3/26193
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES March 16, 1993
ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Mu~oz declared the meeting adjourned at 10:05 P.M.
The next regular meeting of the City of Temecula City Council will be held Tuesday, March
23, 1993, 7:00 P.M., Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California.
Mayor J. Sal Mu~oz
City Clerk June S. Greek
CCMIN03/16/93 -8- 3/26193
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
HELD MARCH 23, 1993
A regular meeting of the Temecula City Council was called to order at 7:06 PM in the
Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California. Mayor Pro Tem Ron
Roberrs presiding.
PRESENT 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall,
Stone
Parks, Roberrs,
ABSENT: I COUNCILMEMBERS: Mu~oz
Also present were City Manager David F. Dixon, City Attorney Scott F. Field, and City Clerk
June S. Greek.
Mayor Mu~oz joined the meeting at 7:08 PM.
INVOCATION
The invocation was given by Pastor George Simmons, Temecula Valley House of Praise.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Councilmember Stone led the audience in the pledge of allegiance.
PRESENTATIONS/
PROCLAMATIONS
Mayor Mu~oz proclaimed April 3, 1993 to be "Day of the Young Child". Janice Hayden
accepted the proclamation and thanked the Mayor and City Council for their support.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Edith Ryan, 6567 Sheltondale, West Hills, CA, addressed the Council regarding lifting
restrictions on Bingo for benefit of the non profit charity organization, "Identity, Inc.".
Councilmember Birdsall stated that Bingo is a fund raiser for the Temecula Community Center,
and is regulated by County ordinance.
City Attorney Field stated this item is not on the agenda and should be agendized for a future
meeting if discussion is to take place.
Minutes~3\23\93 - 1 - 04/05/93
City Council Minutes March 23.1993
CONSENT CALENDAR
Mayor Pro Tem Roberts requested that Item No. 17 be removed from the Consent Calendar.
Councilmember Birdsall stated she would like to register a "no" vote on Item No. 19.
Mayor Mur~oz removed Items 6, 8, 11 and 13 from the Consent Calendar.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Stone to approve
Consent Calendar Items 1-5, 7, 9, 10, 12, 14, 15, 16, 18 and 19.
The motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall,
Mu~oz
None
None
ParkS, Roberts, Stone,
Standard Ordinance Adoption Procedure
1.1
Minutes
2.1
2.2
Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions
included in the agenda.
Approve the minutes of March 6, 1993;
Approve the minutes of March 9, 1993.
e
Resolution ADDrovina List of Demands
3.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-24
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
Minutes\3~23~,93 -2- 04/05193
City Council Minutes March 23, 1993
City Treasurer's Statement of Investment Policy
4.1
Adopt the Treasurer's Statement of Investment Policy as proposed by
Staff which provides safety, liquidity and yield for City funds.
Risk Manaoement Claims Settlement
5.1
Grant the City Manager the authority to reject claims made against the
City and be provided with settlement authority up to $1,000.
Substitution of Storm Drain Improvements Bonds in Tract 23267-2
7.1
Accept Surety Bond for the improvement of Storm Drain Systems in
Tract No. 23267-2 as substitute for bond on file in the Office of the City
Clerk;
7.2
Direct the City Clerk to release the original bond.
w
10.
12.
COmPletion and Acceptance of Traffic Signal Modification at Winchester Road and
Jefferson Avenue, Project No. PW 92-11
9.1
Accept the Traffic Signal Modification at Winchester Road and Jefferson
Avenue, Project No. PW 92-11, as complete and direct the City Clerk to
file the Notice of Completion.
Award of Contract for the Traffic Signal Installation at Winchester Road (HWY 79N)
and Margarita Road (Project No. PW 92-08)
10.1
Award a contract for Traffic Signal Installation at Winchester Road and
Margarita Road, Project No. PW 92-08, to Lekos Electric, Inc. for
~101,999.99, and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract upon
receiving Caltrans approval;
10.2
Authorize the City Manager to approve change order not to exceed the
contingency amount of ~10,200.00, which is equal to 10% of the
contract amount, for a total of $112,199.99.
Reconfirmation of Local Emeraencv
12.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-25
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
RECONFIRMING THE EXISTENCE OF A LOCAL EMERGENCY
Minutes%3~23\93 -3- 04/05193
City Council Minutes March 23.1993
14.
15.
16.
Local Aaencv/State Agreement for Federal-Aid Projects
14.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-26
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVING LOCAL AGENCY/STATE AGREEMENT NO. 08-5459, BETWEEN
THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE CITY OF
TEMECULA TO ESTABLISH FEDERAL FUNDING PROVISIONS
Proaram Supplement No. 002 to the Local Aaencv/State Aareement for Federal-Aid
Projects for the Traffic Sic)nal at Winchester Road (HWY, 79N) and Maraarita Road
(PW 92-08)
15.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-27
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVING PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT NO. 002 TO LOCAL AGENCY/STATE
AGREEMENT NO. 08-5459 BETWEEN THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION AND THE CITY OF TEMECULA TO ESTABLISH FUNDING
FOR THE TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION AT WINCHESTER ROAD (HWY
79N) AND MARGARITA ROAD
Proaram SuDolement Aareement No. 003 to the Local AcJencv/State Agreement for
Federal-Aid Projects for the Traffic Signal at Marqarita Road and La Serena Way (PW
92-06)
16.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-28
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVING PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT NO. 003 TO LOCAL AGENCY/STATE
AGREEMENT NO,. 08-5459 BETWEEN THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION AND THE CITY OF TEMECULA TO ESTABLISH FUNDING
FOR THE TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT MARGARITA ROAD AND LA SERENA WAY
Minutes~3\23%93 -4- 04/05/93
City Council Minutes March 23.1993
1.8. Lease Agreement for Parkine Lot for Temecula Valley Senior Center
18.1
Authorize the City Manager to execute a lease between the City and the
State of California for a parking lot for the Senior Citizen Center. The
lease shall be substantially the form presented subject to the City
Attorney's approval as to final form.
SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES
19. Second Readinq of Graffiti Ordinance
19.1
Read by title only and adopt an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 93-03
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADDING
DIVISION 4 TO CHAPTER 6.14 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE
PERTAINING TO GRAFFITI REMOVAL AND ESTABLISHING REWARDS FOR
INFORMATION LEADING TO THE SUCCESSFUL CONVICTION OF ANY PERSON
PLACING GRAFFITI ON ANY PUBLIC OR PRIVATE PROPERTY
The motion carried by the following vote:
AYES:
4 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Parks, Roberrs, Stone, Mu~oz
NOES:
I COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Addendure to Emeraencv Funding Agreement with Riverside County Flood Control and
Water Conservation District
Mayor Mu~oz asked why the anticipated expenditure has increased. Director of Public
Works Tim Serlet explained that the work has been completed and this final billing
reflects some unanticipated costs.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Stone to approve
staff recommendation as follows:
6.1
Approve Addendum No. I to the Emergency Funding Agreement
("AGREEMENT") with Riverside County Flood Control and Water
Conservation District ("DISTRICT") to limit the maximum amount
payable to the DISTRICT's Contractor to $600,000;
6.2
Require the Contractor to provide Faithful performance bonds;
Minutes%3~23\93 -5- 04/05/93
City Council Minutes March 23.1993
11.
6.3
Authorize the Mayor and the City Clerk to execute Addendum No. 1 'to
the AGREEMENT;
6.4
Appropriate an additional $300,000 to Acct. No. 001-166-999-5420
from General Fund Unreserved Fund Balance.
The motion was unanimously carried.
Status Reoort on Reaional Air Quality Proeram Imolementation
Mayor Mu~oz asked why reference to alternative fuels is not mentioned in this
program. Director of Planning Gary Thornhill explained it is addressed in the complete
plan, however, this report only deals with vehicle trip reduction.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Stone to receive
and file. report.
The motion was unanimously carried.
Award of Contract for the Traffic Sienal Installation at MarQarita Road and La Serena
Wav (Project No. PW 92-06)
Mayor Mu~oz asked why Lekos Lighting was the successful bidder on the
Winchester/Margarita Road Signal project and off by such a large amount on this
similar project.
Director of Public Works Tim Serlet explained there is a difference in the scope of work
and it is common for different contractors to be the successful bidder on similar
projects.
It was moved by Councilmember Stone, seconded by Councilmember Parks to approve
staff recommendation as follows:
11.1
Award a contract for the Traffic Signal Installation at Margarita Road
and La Serena Way, Project No. PW 92-06, to Signal Maintenance, Inc.
for $118,398.65, and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract upon
receiving Caltrans approval;
11.2
Authorize the City Manager to approve change order not to exceed the
contingency amount of $11,839.87 which is equal to 10% of the
contract amount, for a total of $130,238.52.
The motion was unanimously carried.
Minutes%3\23\93 -6- 04/05/93
City Council Minutes March 23, 1993
13.
17.
Award of Professional Services Contracts for Proiect Coordinator, Land SurvevinQ and
Soils Testine for PW 92-05. Ynez Road Widenine (CFD 88-12)
Mayor Mu~oz asked why the services of a project coordinator is necessary for this
project. Director of Public Works Serlet explained that the City currently does not have
adequate staff to devote full time to a job of this type and still maintain current
service levels.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Roberts to
approve staff recommendation as follows:
13.1
Award Professional Services contracts for the construction of the Ynez
Road Widening Project, PW 92-05 which is within CFD 88-12, and
authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the following contracts:
J.F. Davidson Associates, Inc. for land surveying in the amount
of $54,187;
Law/Crandall, Inc. for soils testing and observation in the amount
of $31,400.
· NBS/Lowry as Project Coordinator in the amount of 9130,320.
The motion was unanimously carried.
Disaster Recovery Budget Appropriation
Mayor Pro Tem Roberrs asked why the cost of Fire Services went up. Finance Officer
Mary Jane McLarney explained the original figure was low due to a staff error in
calculating personnel hours.
Mayor Pro Tem Roberrs asked the time frame for the City to be reimbursed for these
costs. Ms. McLarney answered that the City has complied with FEMA requirements
to provide project lists and reported a voucher packet will be presented to FEMA
officials detailing total costs, as well as photographs illustrating damage. She reported
based on conversations with other Finance Directors, experiencing similar disasters,
a projected reimbursement may take approximately two years.
It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Roberts, seconded by Councilmember Stone to
approve staff recommenedation as follows:
17.1
Appropriate an additional $15,000 in account 001-166-999-5288,
Police Services from General Fund Unreserved Fund Balance;
17.2
Appropriate an additional $62,100 in account 001-166-999-5251, Fire
Services from General Fund Unreserved Fund Balance;
Minutes\3\23\93 -7- 04/05/93
City Council Minutes March 23. 1993
17.3
Appropriate an additional $75,000 in account 001-166-999-5401,
Drainage Facility Maintenance from General Fund Unreserved Fund
Balance;
17.4
17.5
Appropriate an additional 885,000 in account 001-166-999-5402,
Street Maintenance from General Fund Unreserved Fund Balance;
Appropriate an additional 95,000 in account 001-166-999-5100,
Salaries and Wages from General Fund Unreserved Fund Balance.
The motion was unanimously carried.
COUNCIL BUSINESS
Mayor Mu~oz reordered the agenda to take Item 24 out of order.
24. Discussion of Walmart Proposal
City Manager Dixon presented the staff report.
Councilmember Stone asked City Manager Dixon how he arrived at the projected sales
tax benefits. City Manager Dixon explained they were based upon a number of
comparisons between cities with similar population and store size projections.
Councilmember Parks asked if K-Mart and Target are included in Assessment District
161. City Manager Dixon stated they are not. Councilmember Parks said that he feels
the incentives offered places Walmart on an equal basis with Target and K-Mart since
Walmart will be included in this district.
Councilmember Birdsall asked what type of return the City is currently rece. iving on
investment funds. Finance Officer Mary Jane McLarney stated the City. is currently
earning 4.5 percent. Councilmember Birdsall stated she feels that if the City only
receives 1/2 of the projected sales tax revenues, the Walmart proposal will be a very
beneficial proposal.
RECESS
Mayor Mu~oz declared a recess at 8:03 PM. The meeting was reconvened at 8:13 PM with
all members present.
The following citizens spoke in favor of the Walmart proposal:
Steve Eytchison, 27620 Commerce Center Drive,//101.
Minutes~3~23~93 -8- 04/05/93
City Council MinuTes March 23, 1993
Russell Rumansoff, 27349 Jefferson Avenue, Suite 206, representing the
Temecula-Murrieta Economic Development Corporation.
David Lowry, 27349 Jefferson Road, spoke in favor and also addressed the need for
Councilmembers to remain neutral on an issue until both sides have been
presented.
Tim McMahon, 33962 Blue Lantern, Dana Point, representing Grubb & Ellis
Commercial Real Estate.
Dan Atwood, 30521 Del Rey.
Dick Kurtz, 43500 Ridge Park Drive,//201.
Ben Fraleigh, 27740 Jefferson.
Patricia L. Partin, 28410 Front Street,//104-281.
Sergio Contreras, 26463 Ynez Road, representing So Cal Cinemas.
Dee Belles, 30661 Avenida Buena Suerte.
Dixie Schleiger, 2076 5 Alameda Del Monte, Wildomar, small business owner.
Steve Alquist, 31265 Enfield Lane, representing Temecula-Murrieta Economic
Development Corp.
Edward Andersen, 27431 Bolandra Court.
Brian Price, 30252 Tomas, Ste 200, representing Coco's Bakery and Restaurant.
Joe Meyer, 37570 University Avenue, Riverside, representing the applicant, spoke in
favor stating it makes economic sense and in general most retailers are in favor. He
stated he would be available for questions.
Robert Meadow, President of Decision Research, also representing the applicant,
reported on the results of a survey conducted within the City of Temecula, showing
a two-thirds ratio of approval rate for Walmart.
Greg Erickson, 43164 Corte Colandra, representing the applicant spoke in favor stating
he feels this will be the kick-off for a regional center which would attract other stores
to the area.
Bryan Noreen, General Manager of Kernper Real Estate, representing the applicant,
spoke in favor of the proposal stating it will provide a method of funding necessary
infrastructure improvements.
The following citizens spoke in opposition to the Walmart proposal:
Maria Hetzner, 40657 Carmelita.
Lauretta Olson, 41949 Kaffinboom.
Jackie Conrad, 45796 Hopaetong.
Joseph R. Terrazas, 31160 Lahontan Street, spoke against offering incentives.
Gladys Morris, 41730 Gailwood Court.
Lori Rubin, 27483 Jefferson Avenue, representing Looking Good Beauty Supply.
John Hunneman, representing KRTM, 27645 Jefferson.
Fran Rifkin, 31366 Corte Montiel.
Minutes~3\23~93 -9- 04/05/93
City Council Minutes March 23.1993
RECESS
Mayor Mu~oz declared a brief recess at 9:11 PM to change the tape. The meeting was
reconvened at 9:12 PM with all members present.
The following citizens concluded in opposition to the Walmart proposal:
Jayme Christian, 30762 Calle Pina Colada, spoke in opposition to incentives being
offered to Walmart.
Roger Bergstein, 29605 Solana Way.
Charles March, 28522 Via Las Flores, Murrieta.
Sally Myers, 44041 Northgate Avenue, spoke in opposition to incentives.
Louis Todd, 30645 Southern Cross Road, spoke in opposition to incentives.
RECESS
Mayor Mu~oz declared a recess at 9:22 PM. The meeting was reconvened 9:38 PM with all
members present.
Councilmember Parks spoke in favor of staff recommendation stating all parties
negotiated in good faith and a very favorable proposal has been reached. He stated
he feels this proposal is in the best interest of the City, due to the tax dollars it will
generate and competition it will provide to keep prices low in Temecula.
Mayor Pro Tem Roberrs spoke in favor of the proposal stating he feels the sales tax
benefit during the first year will more than outweigh the cost of incentives. He
explained that he feels that the current number of discount stores is not a valid reason
to deny the proposal. He did object, however, to the proposed location of Walmart.
Councilmember Stone spoke against the Walmart proposal explaining he feels the City
is setting a precedent during difficult economic times regarding incentives. He stated
a redistribution of existing tax dollars will occur instead of additional revenues being
generated. He also requested that a non-competition clause be added to the proposal
to protect the City from future Walmarts competing within a 15 mile radius.
It was moved by Councilmember Stone, seconded by Councilmember Birdsall to extend
the meeting until 11:00 PM. The motion was unanimously carried.
Councilmember Birdsall spoke in favor of the Walmart proposal explaining that without
large contributors to the Mello Roos District (88-12), IDrojects such as the Overland
Crossing will not be funded. She stated she is a small business owner and feels
competition is healthy for a community. She further stated that incentives offered to
other businesses, such as Costco, have more than paid for themselves through
increased sales tax.
Minutes~3~23\93 -1 O- O4105/93
City Council Minutes March 23.1993
Mayor Mu~oz spoke against the Walmart proposal, stating he feels it is not in the
City's best interest to offer incentives to one of the largest retailers in the Country, and
stated that public funds must be protected in difficult economic times.
RECESS
Mayor Mur~oz declared a brief recess at 10:30 PM to change the tape. The meeting was
reconvened at 10:31 PM with all members present.
It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Parks to
approve staff recommendation.
Councilmember Stone requested that a requirement for a 15 mile non-competition
radius be added as part of the motion.
Councilmember Parks asked if Lake Elsinore is within 15 miles, and suggested a
possible a I O-mile radius.
Councilmember Parks said he was willing-to amend the motion to include a 10 mile
non competition radius.
City Manager Dixon stated this point was not agreed upon, and it could cause the
process to have to be renegotiated.
Mayor Mu~oz asked Joe Meyer, representing Walmart, if a 10 mile non-competition
clause would be agreeable to the applicant. Mr. Meyer stated that although there are
no plans for another Walmart in the immediate I 0-mile area, this is a provision that
would not be agreeable to Walmart.
The motion to approve staff recommendation as follows:
24.1
Approve a waiver of fees totaling approximately $133,000 for permits,
inspections, development impact fees and signal mitigation fees, a net cash
incentive for the payment of fees to other jurisdictions in the amount of
$62,000 and acceptance of long-term debt service on A.D. 161 in a mount, not
to exceed $167,000. The City Attorney was directed to prepare the necessary
and appropriate documents.
was carried by the following vote:
AYES:
3 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Parks, Roberts
NOES:
2 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Stone, Mur~oz
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Minutes~3\23~93 -11- 04/05/93
City Council Minutes March 23. 1993
RECESS
Mayor Mu~oz declared a recess at 10:46 PM. The meeting was reconvened at 11:30 PM
following the previously scheduled Community Services District and the Redevelopment
Agency meetings.
20. Addition to Anti-Graffiti Ordinance
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Stone to continue
Item No. 20 to the meeting of April 13, 1993. The motion was unanimously carried.
23. Business Incentive Pro(~ram
At the City Manager's request, it was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by
Councilmember Parks to continue Item No. 23 to the meeting of April 13, 1993. The
motion was unanimously carried.
It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Parks to extend the
meeting until 12:00 AM.
The motion carried by the following vote:
AYES:
3 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Parks, Roberts
NOES:
2 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Stone, Mu~oz
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
21. Approval Of Fiscal Year 1993-94 Community Development Block Grant APPliCations
Financial Services Administrator Grant Yates presented the staff report.
RECESS
Mayor Mu~oz declared a brief recess at 11:44 PM to change the tape. The meeting
was reconvened at 11:46 PM with all members present.
Joan Ellis, 40105 Ravenwood Drive Murrieta, representing CSA 143 and City of
Murrieta, requested the City Council recommend CDBG funding for the Dial-a-ride
Transit program.
Minutes%3~23\93 -12- 04/05/93
City Council Minutes March 23. 1993
22.
Ben Novelle, a local therapist, representing Alternatives to Domestic Violence
requested the Council recommend CDBG funding for this program, stating the problem
is serious and does exist in this area.
Councilmember Parks asked how many cases were responded to last year. Mr. Novell
stated that 1,784 calls were received in the area which includes Corona through
Temecula.
Louise Ball, 27464 Commerce Center Drive, representing Operation School Bell
requested the City Council consider their request for funding. She stated in 1991-92,
190 children were clothed and in 1992-93, the number increased to 568 children. She
explained children are referred to the program directly by the school district and this
program enables children to continue attending school. She said without such help
many would eventually drop out.
Councilmember Stone asked if there are other sources of funding that could be used
for the Graffiti program. City Manager Dixon suggested that Item No. 3, Community
Watch - Graffiti Stakeouts, could be funded out of existing funds.
Councilmember Parks spoke in support of Operation School Bel'l and Alternatives to
Domestic Violence and asked if there are other sources of funding available to assist
with the County Service Area 143 DiaI-A Ride program, which is also a very
worthwhile project.
City Manager Dixon stated it might probably be easier to explore other funding for that
program because it falls under the area of transportation.
Councilmember Birdsall suggested assisting the Dial A Ride program by providing a
cellular phone for their use.
Mayor Pro Tem Roberrs and Mayor Mu~oz also supported funding for operation School
Bell and Alternatives to Domestic Violence, requested that alternative forms of funding
for the other two projects be investigated.
It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Roberrs, seconded by Councilmember Parks to
approve the funding for Operation School Bell ($10,000), Alternative to Domestic
Violence ($10,000), Sam Hicks Park Improvements ($30,000) and Pujol Street
Improvements ($122,450). The motion was unanimously carried.
Mayor Mu~oz recommended that Item No. 22 be continued.
Boys and Girls Club Project
It was moved by Councilmember Stone, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Roberrs to
continue Item No. 22 to the meeting of April 13, 1993.
Minutes\3~23~93 -13- 04/05/93
City Council Minutes March 23.1993
The motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: 3
NOES: 2
ABSENT: 0
CITY MANAGER REPORTS
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
None given.
Roberrs, Stone, Mu~oz
Birdsall, Parks
None
CITY ATTORNEY REPORTS
City Attorney Field reported that the Owner Participation Agreement for Walmart will be
placed on the agenda of April 13, 1993.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Mayor Mu~oz asked if their is a problem with issues regarding the Lutheran Church. City
Attorney Field responded that pursuant to Council instruction, the City has obtained an
appraisal but he would prefer to review it with Council in closed session at the Council
Meeting on April 13, 1993.
Councilmember Birdsall requested that staff look into placing a painted crosswalk at the corner
of Ynez and Moraga Road on Rancho California Road. She also asked if there has been a
change in scheduling of the April 6, 1993 meeting by Supervisor Buster's office. Mayor
Mu~oz stated he has not received a reply, but will keep trying.
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Councilmember Stone, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Roberrs to adjourn at
12:16 PM. The motion was unanimously carried.
ATTEST:
J. Sal Mur~oz, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
Minutes~3\23\93 -14- 04/05/93
ITEM
NO.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA)
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby do certify that the
foregoing Resolution No. 93- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the
City of Temecula on the 13th day of April, 1993 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS: None
NOE: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS: None
June S. Greek, City Clerk
~ R~o 303 -2-
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLIYrlON OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS
SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE,
DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A have been
audited by the City Manager, and that the same are hereby allowed in the amount of
$1,082,986.20
Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTFJ}, this 13th day of April, 1993.
ATTEST:
J. Sal Mu~oz, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
03/18/93 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
03/25/93 TOTAL CHECK RUM:
04/01/93 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
04/13/93 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
03/25/93 PAYROLL:
TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 04/13/93 COUNCIL HEETING:
DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND:
CHECKS:
001
100
110
140
190
191
192
193
210
250
280
:500
::310
320
330
PAYROL L:
001
100
190
191
192
193
300
320
330
GENERAL
GAS TAX FUND
RANCHO CA RD REINB DIST
COHNUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT
TCSD
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D
CAPITAL PROJECTS - TCSD
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY-CIP
INSURANCE FUND
VEHICLE FUND
INFORMATIONS SYSTEMS
COPY CENTER FUND
GENERAL (PAYROLL)
GAS TAX FUND (PAYROLL)
· TCSD (PAYROLL)
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A (PAYROLL)
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B (PAYROLL)
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C (PAYROLL)
INSURANCE FUND (PAYROLL)
INFORMATION SYSTEMS (PAYROLL)
COPY CENTER FUND (PAYROLL)
TOTAL BY FUND:
CITY OF TEMECULA
LIST OF DEMANDS
$505,681
$19,685.83
SBO0.O0
$8,827.00
$29,061.01
$6,
S8,58~,15
S3,575.92
$233,/t41.52
$62,4.89.02
$74,076.2.3
S13,:520.57
$203.15
$15,060.9~
$7,473.75
$61,582.75
$11,888.97
$15,419.57
S736.86
$1,~52.15
S596.70
S1,102.52
$1,~03.21
$123,617.86
$61,788.79
$326,121.52
S,r+76,888.58
$94,569.45
$1,082,986,20
$988,416.75
$94,569.65
$1,082,986.20
' ~ ' r~ ,HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLINING IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
MARY JANE q RNEY ~I,N FICER
I,|/~%k,j , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOk/ING IS TRUE AND CORRECT,
DAVE DIXON, CITY MANAG;R
VOUCHRE2
03/18/93
16:15
CITY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
8
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
100 GAS TAX FUND
110 RANCHO CALIF ROAD REIHB DIST
160 COINUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT
190 COt414UNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
210 CAPITAL INPROVENENT PROJ FUND
280 REDEVELOPtlENT AGENCY - C]P
300 INSURANCE FUND
310 VEHICLES FUND
320 INFORHATION SYSTEHS
330 coPY CENTER FUND
TOTAL
ANOUNT
67,:.~5.27
2,04,8.99
800.00
8,827.00
8,656.92
5,211.87
1,815.16
721.81
45,044.68
38.05
141.72
716.25
2,452.14
123,'617.86
VOUCHRE2
03/18/93
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUHBER
14533
14534
14535
14536
14537
14538
14538
14538
14538
14539
14540
14541
14542
14544
14544
14544
14545
14545
14545
14545
14545
14545
14545
14545
14546
14547
14547
14547
14548
14549
14549
14550
14550
16:15
CHECK
DATE
03/18/93
03/18/93
03/18/93
03/18/93
03/18/93
03/18/93
03/18/93
03/18/93
03/18/93
03/18/93
03/18/93
03/18/93
03/18/93
03/18/93
03/18/93
03/18/93
03/18/93
03/18/93
03/18/93
03/18/93
03/18/93
03/18/93
03/18/93
03/18/93
03/18/93
03/18/93
03/18/93
03/18/93
03/18/93
03/18/93
03/18/93
03/18/93
03/18/93
03/18/93
VENDOR
NUMBER
000112
000120
000124
000127
000127
000127
000127
000135
000144
000155
000165
000177
000192
000192
000192
000194
000194
000194
000194
000194
000194
000194
000194
000202
000206
000206
000206
000212
000214
000214
000218
000218
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VENDOR ITEM
NANE DESCRIPTION
CASSARO, KATHLEEN
BERRY, RUDY S.
CASSARO / REFUND
RUOY BERRY/REFUND
AHERICAN PLANNING ASSOC 4 PLANNING BOARD MEMBER
BICKNELL TRAVEL CENTER GFOA CONFERENCE MJ
C.E,P,O.
REGISTRAT[OR FEE/CNC
CALIFORNIAN
CALIFORNIAN
CALIFORN]AN
CALIFORNIAN
TOO891&QY NOTICE OF PUB
TOO1985RV & TOOI~V
TOO3127RW & TOO806~RW
TOO3625QW CAMERA READY
CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER YNEZ RD WIDENING SIGNS
COSTCO WHOLESALE
SUPPLIES FOR TEEN FEST
DAVLIN
CITY COUNCIL MTG 3/9/93
FEDERAL EXPRESS
ACCT NO 1339-1107-3
GLENNIES OFFICE PROUUCT STAPLER
GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE
GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPL]E
GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPL]E
C3469 SONY DG-90N 4NN D
FREIGHT
TAX
ICNA RETIREMENT
ICNA RETIREMENT
ICNA RETIREMENT
ICNA RETIREMENT
ICMA RETIREMENT
ICNA RETIREMENT
ICMA RETIREMENT
ICNA RETIREMENT
INSURANCE PREM FOR NARC
INSURANCE PREM FOR RARC
INSURANCE PREM FOR MARC
INSURANCE PREM FOR MARC
INSURANCE PREM FOR MARC
INSURANCE PREM FOR NARC
INSURANCE PREM FOR RARC
INSURANCE PREM FOR MARC
J.F. DAVIDSON
CARRY OVER FRON C0-381
KINKO'S COPIES
KINKO'S COPIES
KINKO'S COPIES
OPEN P.O. FOR NISC. SER
OPEN P.O. FOR NISC. SER
OPEN P.O. FOR NISC. SER
LEWIS VALLEY CONTRACTOR
LUNCH & STUFF CATERING
LUNCH & STUFF CATERING
AHENDMENT TO CONTRACT;
TEN & BUR PARKS & REC W
CITY COUNCIL MTG 3/16
NARILYN'S COFFEE SERVIC OPEN P.O. FOR COFFEE SE
NARILYN'S COFFEE SERVIC OPEN P.O. FOR COFFEE SE
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
190 - 183 - 4969
001-2670
001 - 161 -~-5226
001 - 140-~-5258
001-110-~-5258
001 - 161 -~-5256
001 - 120-~-5256
001-161-990-5256
001 - 140-~-5254
lO0-164-~-52U,
190-183-933-5300
001 - 100-~-5250
001-110-~-5230
001 - 161 -~-5220
320-190-~-5221
320-190-~-5221
320-190-~-5221
001-2080
1 O0 - 2080
1~1)-2080
191-2OB0
193-2080
300-2080
320-2080
330-2080
110-165-605-580~
330-190- ~ - 5590
330-199-999-5590
330-190- 999- 5590
210-190-134-5802
190 - 180 - 909- 5258
001-100-~-5260
001 - 190-~-5250
001 - 190-~-5250
ITEM
AMOUNT
2,00
850.00
224.00
223.00
710.00
34.20
21.&8
79.76
292.72
133.43
196.02
696.23
12.00
91.87
190.90
2.10
14.79
7,134.83
1,025.68
1,456.00
62.38
76.24
38.05
462.02
293.76
800.00
4,09
21.00
33.29
715.00
108.00
80.00
124,18
PAGE 2
CHECK
AHOUNT
2.00
850.00
224.00
223. O0
710.00
428.36
196.02
696.23
12.00
91.87
207.79
10,548.~
800, O0
58.38
715.00
188.00
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TENECULA
03/18/93 16:15 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
3
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NLINBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRZPTXON NUMBER
ITEM
AMOLINT
CHECK
AMOUNT
16550 03/18/93 000218 NARILYN'S COFFEE SERVIC OPEN P.O. FOR COFFEE SE 001-199-999-5250
56.85
228.75
16551 03/18/93 000261 ORANGE SPORTING GOODS DE BEER TC 12 SOFTBALLS 190-183-907-5300
16551 03/18/93 000241 ORANGE SPORTING GO00S TAX 190-18~-905-5300
16551 03/18/93 000261 ORANGE SPORTING C_J3C(J$ TAX 190-183-905-5300
14551 03/18/93 000261 ORANGE SPORTING GOOOS TAX 190-183-905-5300
231.00
3.~
9.08
5.08
248.90
16552 03/18/93 000269 PETTY CASH CITY PETTY CASH 001-160-999-5260
16552 03/18/93 000269 PETTY CASH MISC CHGS 001-160-999-5260
16552 03/18/93 000249 PETTY CASH N[SC CHGS 001-140-999-5258
16552 03/18/93 000269 PETTY CASH 001-161-999-5258 001-1990
16552 03/18/93 000269 PETTY CASH 001-161-999-5258 001-110-999-5260
14552 03/18/93 000269 PETTY CASH MISC CHGS 190-180-999-5220
16552 03/18/93 000269 PETTY CASH MISt CHGS 001-162-999-5220
14552 03/18/93 000269 PETTY CASH MISC CHGS 001-199-999-5220
16552 0~/18/93 000249 PETTY CASH MISC CHGS 001-163-999-5260
16552 03/18/93 000269 PETTY CASH MISC CHGS 001-161-999-5230
16552 03/18/93 000269 PETTY CASH MISC CHGS 001-100-999-5260
14552 03/18/93 000269 PETTY CASH M[SC CHGS 001-163-999-5220
16552 03/18/93 000269 PETTY CASH MISC CHGS 001-160-999-5220
14552 03/18/93 000249 PETTY CASH M]SC CHGS 001-150-999-5220
16552 03/18/93 000249 PETTY CASH MISC CHGS 001-163-999-5250
16552 03118193 000249 PETTY CASH 001-110-999-5220 001-1990
14552 03/18/93 000269 PETTY CASH N[SC CHGS 001-100-999-5220
14552 03/18/93 000269 PETTY CASH MISC CHGS 001-150-999-5260
14552 03/18/93 000269 PETTY CASH NISC CHGS 320-199-999-5221
16.70
16.70
51.76
11.00
22.29
2.69
2.10
18.90
83.33
65.06
15.00
5.39
12.9:5
14.65
14.54
10.00
2.69
7.74
20.66
373.91
14553 03/18/93 000261 RANCHO BLUEPRINT TEMECULA SENIOR CENTER 210-199-801-5802
14553 03/18/93 000261 RANCHO BLUEPRINT MYLARS; EOC STATUS BOAR 001-150-999-5220
14553 03/18/93 000261 RANCHO BLUEPRINT EOC STATUS BOARD 001-150-999-5220
6.81
21.55
56.89
85.25
14554 03/18/93 000262 RANCHO HATER 12122-1126 193-180-999-5260
14554 03/18/93 O00262 RANCHO HATER 12/22-1/26 191-180-999-5260
14554 03/18/93 000262 RANCHO HATER 12/22-1/26 190-180-999-5260
14554 03/18/93 000262 RANCHO WATER HATER JAN 1993 190-180-999-5240
14554 03/18/93 000262 RANCHO HATER HATER JAN 1993 191-180-999-5240
14554 03/18/93 000262 RANCHO HATER WATER JAN 1993 193-180-999-5240
14554 03/18/93 000262 RANCHO HATER HATER 01/15-02/12 193-180-999-5240
14555 03/18/93 000266 RIGHTWAY
14556 03/18/93 000280 SC SIGNS
14556 03/18/93 000280 SC SIGNS
16557 03/18/93 000285 SIR SPEEDY
14557 03/18/93 000285 SIR SPEEDY
14557 03/18/93 000285 SIR SPEEDY
14557 03/18/93 000285 SIR SPEEDY
16557 03/18/93 000285 SIR SPEEDY
14557 03/18/93 000285 SIR SPEEDY
16557 03/18/93 000285 SIR SPEEDY
PORTABLE TOILET; 1 YEAR 100-166-999-5238
CITY COUNCIL SIGNS 001-120-999-5256
PLANNING COlit PUBLIC HE 001-161-999-5256
BUSINESS CARD STOCK; GO 001-100-999-5220
BUSINESS CARD STOCK; GO 001-110-999-5Z20
BUSINESS CARD STOCK; GO 001-1153-999-5220
BUSINESS CARD STOCK; GO 001-161-999-5220
BUSINESS CARD STOCK; GO 001-162-999-5220
BUSINESS CARD STOCK; GO 001-160-999-5220
BUSINESS CARD STOCK; GO 001-150-999-5220
968.58
46.10
155.96
860.20
80.45
310.04
176.23
57.39
65.00
]60. O0
346.60
125.15
277.28
207.96
69.32
221.65
69.32
2,597.56
57.39
405.00
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA
03/18/~3 16:15 VOUCHER/CHECK REG[STER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAHE DESCRIPTION NUMBER
ITEM
AHOUNT
CHECK
AHOUNT
14557 0)/18/9) 000285 SIR SPEEDY BUSINESS CARD STOCK; GO 001-120-;-5220
14557 03/18/93 000285 SIR SPEEDY BUSINESS CARD STOCK; GO 190-180-;-5220
14557 03/18/93 000285 SIR SPEEDY 3000 BUSINESS LICENSE C 001-140-;-5222
14557 03/18/93 000285 SIR SPEEDY TAX 001-140-999-5222
14558 03/18/93 000319 TONARK SPORTS, INC. 10145 FOIJR-WAY PITCHERS 190-183-906-5300
14558 03/18/93 000319 TONARK SPORTS,/NC. 10225 ANCHOR GROUND STA 190-183-906-5300
14558 03/18/93 000319 TONARK SPORTS, INC. FREIGHT 190-183-906-5300
14558 03/18/93 000319 TONARK SPORTS, INC. TAX 190-183-906-5300
69.32
277.26
800.00
62.00
380.00
198.00
22.08
44.80
2,525.66
14559 03/18/93 000320 TOil CENTER STATIONERS KEYBOARD REST,BUS CARD 001"161'999'5220
14559 03/18/93 000320 TOtl CENTER STATIONERS REDINOIJNT SHEET, BINDER 001-166-~-5242
14559 03/18/93 000320 TO~I CENTER STATIONERS FOLDERS 1/3 CUT 001'163'999'5220
14559 03/18/93 000320 TONN CENTER STATIONERS INDEX, ffi)NTHLY & INDEX, 001'166'999'5242
125.69
51.72
7~.60
14560 03/18/93 000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE 2-SETS OF UNIFORMS; CLE 100-164-~-5243
12.50
12.50
14561 03/18/93 000332 VANDORPE CHOU ASSOCIAT! PLAN CHECKS FOR FEB 199 001-162-~-5248
4;'5.00
475.00
14562 03/18/93 000339 WEST PUBLISHING COMPANY REF #66469230 CA CD AN- 001-120-~q~-5228
69.57
69.57
14563 03/18/93 000340 WHITE CAP MISC ITEMS 100-16~-~q-5242
4 03/18/~3 000342 WINDSOR PARTNERS - RANC RENT FOR MARCH 001-199-~-523~
,.J64 03/18/93 000342 WINDSOR PARTNERS - RANC CREDIT FOR CAN 001-199-999-52~4
14565 03/18/93 000374 SOUTHERN CAL]F EDISON 51779050812020003 1/28-193-180-~-5240
14565 03/18/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 1/28-3/02 191-180-999-5500
14565 03/18/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 51779055796020002 1/28- 193-180-999-5240
14565 03/18/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 51T/~059001020005 1/28-191-180-~-5500
14565 03/18/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 52777960816020009 2/1-3 191-180-99~-5500
14565 03/18/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 52779070200010000 1/4-2 191-180-~-5500
14565 03/18/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 52779070200010000 2/1-3 191-180-99~-5500
14565 03/18/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 53778001401020000 2/2-3 191-180-~-5500
14565 03/18/93 000374 SOUTHERN CAL/F EDISON 53778061811030007 2/3-3 1~0-180-~-5240
14565 03/18/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 53778130153020007 1/6-2 191-180-999-5500
14565 03/18/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 53778130153020007 2/3-3 191-180-999-5500
14565 03/18/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 5377813112003000~ 1/6-2 1~0-180-~-5240
14565 03/18/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 53778131120030004 2/3-3 190-180-~-5240
14565 03/18/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 5377813210~01000~ 1/6-2 190-180-~-5240
14565 03/18/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 53778133201020003 2/3-3 191-180-~-5500
14565 03/18/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 53778500090020007 2/~-3 191-180-~-5500
14565 03/18/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 53778509~0101000~ 2/3-3 191-180-999-5500
14565 03/18/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 54778077614020001 2/3-3 lf$-180-9~-5240
14565 03/18/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 54778077626020007 2/3-3 193-180-99~-5240
14565 03/18/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 54778280102020000 2/3-0 193-180-~-5240
14565 03/18/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 54778282002020007 2/3-3 193-180-~-5240
14565 03/18/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2/03-3/04 1~3-180-~q~-5240
14565 03/18/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2/03-3/04 193-180-9~9-5240
14565 03/18/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2/03-3/04 193-180-999-5240
1~2~5 03/18/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 57775656701020002 1/9-2 193-180-~-5240
308.73
31,048.03
2,420.89-
14.29
51.45
14.29
186.64
171.79
115.60
121.68
211.59
12.58
143.43
144 .~
832.38
737.08
1,030,62
122.48
12~.21
125.59
13.15
12.58
12.58
12.58
16.41
12.58
12.58
12.95
308.73
29,427.14
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TENECULA
03/18/93 16:15 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE 5
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTIOR NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
14565 03/18/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 57777802489030007 1/10-193-180-999-5240
14565 03/18/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALZF EDISON 597780554Z~030006 1/12-193-180-999-5240
14565 03/18/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALZF EDISON 59774160080020003 1/12-191-180-999-5500
14565 03/18/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 59774162307020006 1/12-191-180-999-5500
14565 03/18/9~ 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 5977416~505010003 1/12-191-180-999-5500
14565 03/18/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 59777992338030005 1/12-193-180-999~5240
14565 03/18/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISOR 5977799250~030003 1/12-193-180-999-5240
14565 03/18/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 59777993303010006 1/12-193-180-999-5240
14565 03/18/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 59777994085030006 1/12-193-180-999-5240
14565 03/18/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 5977802541403O000 1/13-193-180-999-5240
14565 03/18/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 59778051021030001 1/12-193-180-999-5240
14565 03/18/93 00037~ SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 60774110255030004 1/10-193-180-999-5240
14565 03/18/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 6O774111095030006 1/13-193-180-999-5240
14565 03/18/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALZF EDISON 66774050677020000 1/21-191-180-999-5500
14565 03/18/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDZSOR 667740510~0020008 1/21-191-180-999-5500
14565 03/18/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 66775850900020001 1/21-191-180-999-5500
14565 03/18/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDZSOR 66777950150010005 1/22-191-180-999-5500
14565 03/18/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 66777950152010O03 1/22-191-180-999-5500
14565 03/18/93 O00374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 66777956986030000 1/2~- 190-182-999-5240
14565 03/18/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISOR 66777956988050006 1/22-190-182-999-5240
14565 03/18/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALZF EDISON 66777956990040003 1/22-190-182-999-5240
14565 03/18/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 667779580800~0000 1/22-190-180-999-5240
14565 03/18/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 66777958462030009 1/22-191-180-999-5240
14565 03/18/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 66777959913020003 1/22-191-180-999-5500
14565 03/18/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 67778639414020002 1/22-191-180-999-5500
14565 03/18/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 6977678010702000~ 1/25-193-180-999-5240
14565 03/18/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALZF EDISON 69776781651O20002 1/25-191-180-999-5500
14566 03/18/93 000375 SOUTHERN CALZF TELEPHON 714-~5-7423 $N 001-100-999-5208
14566 03/18/93 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 909-202-4204 FEB ~/E 001-110-999-5208
14566 03/18/93 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHOR 909-202-4751TS 001-16~-999-5208
14566 03/18/93 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 909-202-4754 GK 190-180-999-5208
14566 03/18/93 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHOR 909-202-4757 FEB JG O01-120-999-5208
14566 03/18/93 000375 SOUTHERN CALZF TELEPHON 909-202-4758 FEB RR O01-100-999-5208
14566 03/18/93 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 909-202-4759 JAN TE 001-162-999-5208
14566 03/18/93 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 909-202-4759 FEB TE 001-162-999-5208
14566 03/18/93 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 909-202-4761 FEB $N 001-100-999-5208
14566 03/18/93 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 909-202-4763 FEB PB 001-100-999-5208
14566 03/18/93 000375 SOUTHERN CAL]F TELEPNON 909-202-4765 BB 001-16~-999-5208
14566 03/18/93 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPNON 909-202-4769 FEB JS 001-100-999-5208
23.35
12.38
116.87
122.05
16~.53
12.38
12.38
12.38
13.07
13.13
12.38
12.65
12.53
9.44
158.82
145.38
135.07
128.21
118.95
203.80
78.98
26,78
46.36
166.29
176.75
13.45
169.89
16.25
51.02
61.18
40.22
45.19
51.34
41.29
161.58
48.22
87.0~
76.47
6,383.23
724.18
14567 03/18/93 000398 CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL REGISTRATION/4/20-4/23 001-140-999-5258
315.00
315.00
145~8 03/18/93 000608 AGRICREDIT ACCEPTANCE C TRACTOR LEASE FOR APRIL 190-180-999-5239
14569 03/18/93 000423 H & H CRAFT & FLORAL SU OPEN P.O. RECREATION $U 190-180-999-53O0
14570 03/18/93 00062,7 COI4TRONIX OF HEMET APX-11002 UNIDEN SPARE 001-166-999-5242
14570 03/18/93 0002~7 CONTRONIX OF HEMET TAX 001-166-999-5242
14571 03/18/93 0~0492 NcLARNEY, MARY JANE REIMB FOR PHONE CALLS 001-166-999-5208
' 84.6.02
16.51
67.50
5.23
17.71)
81,6.02
16.51
72.~
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TENECULA
03/18/93 16:15 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR I TEN ACCOUNT
NUNBER DATE NUIqBER NANE DESCRIPTION NUNBER
I TEN
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
14571 03/18/93 000492 NcLARNEY, NARY JANE REINB FOR PHONE CALLS 001-140-999-5208
29.40
47.10
14572 03/18/93 000532 SECURITY PACIFIC NAT#L 4798-0200-0001-4270 TS 001-166-999-5450
14572 03/18/93 000532 SECURITY PACIFIC NAT'L 4798-0200-0001-4270 TS 001-163-999-5260
248.27
93.65
341.92
14573 03/18/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI 1/31-2/28 191-180-999-5500
14573 03/18/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED] 1/31-2/28 191-180-999-5500
14573 03/18/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI 1/31-2/28 191-180-999-5500
14573 03/18/93 000537 SOUTHERN CAL]FORNIA EDI 1/31-2/28 191-180-999-5500
14573 03/18/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI 1/31-2/28 191-180-~99-5500
14573 03/18/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDZ 1/31-2/28 191-180-999-5500
14573 03/18/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED[ 1/31-2/28 191-180-999-5500
14573 03/18/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI 1/31-2/28 191-180-999-5500
14573 03/18/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED! 1/31-2/28 191-180-999-5500
14573 03/18/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED] 1/31-2/28 191-180-999-5500
14573 03/18/93 000537 SOUTHERN CAL]FORN]A ED] 1/31-2/28 191-180-999-5500
14573 03/18/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI 1/31-2/28 191-180-~99-5500
14573 03/18/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI 1/31-2/28 191-180-~99-5500
14573 03/18/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED[ 1/31-2/28 191-180-999-5500
14573 03/18/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI 1/31-2/28 191-180-~9-5500
14573 03/18/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED1 1/31-2/28 191-180-999-5500
14573 03/18/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI 1/31-2/28 191-180-999-5500
03/18/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI 1/31-2/28 191-180-999-5500
: 03/18/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI 1/31-2/28 191-180-999-5500
,~jt3 03/18/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDZ 4377077560001 9/22-12/3 191-180-999-5500
14573 03/18/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI 1/31-2/28 191-180-999-5500
14573 03/18/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI 1/31-Z/28 191-180-99~-5500
14574 03/18/93 000596 LEAGUE OF CA CITIES/LAF REGISTRATION/APRIL 22/2 001-100-999-5258
43.50
43.09
20.92
24.22
35.30
17.48
39.73
39.39
37.42
38.08
45.93
39.44
42.27
34.77
43.86
114.82
32.8]
21.96
28.58
1,156.16
37.72
27,40
170.00
1,9(~,.87
170.00
14573 03/18/93 000609 DOUBLETREE SUITES
14573 03/18/93 000609 DOUBLETREE SUITES
CREDIT FOR IqOVIES INCOR 001-166-999-5451
ROONS USED DURING FLOOD 001-16&-999-5451
15.90-
216.73
200.8~
14576 03/18/93 0006/,9 NUNOZ, SAL J.
14576 03/18/93 000649 NUNOZ, SAL J.
REINB/LIVABLE CONN & BI 001-100-999-5258
CELLULAR PHONE CHARGES 001-100-999-5208
125.62
50.44-
73.18
14577 03/18/93 000676 AUTOIqOTIVE SPECIALTIES INSTALLATION OF TMO LIG 100-164-999-5242
14577 03/18/93 000676 AUTONOTIVE SPECIALTIES AD-15 NINI-AERO LIGHT B 100-164-~99-5242
14577 03/18/93 000676 AUTOIqOTIVE SPECIALTIES CLR-IO STEALTH LIGHT RA 100-164-999-5242
14577 03/18/93 000676 AUTONOTIVE SPECIALTIES LIGHT BAR ON CHEW TRUC 310-164-999-5214
99.14
322.17
89,95
141.72
652.98
14578 03/18/93 000680 AIqS-TNS REPLENISH POSTAGE 330-199-999-5230
1457~ 03/18/93 000729 gORDPERFECT CORP. SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL 320-1~-~-5228
2,100.00
24.00
2,100.00
24.00
14580 03/18/93 000730 EDVALSOR, HARgO00
REINB/LEAGUE OF CA CITI 001-110-~99-5258
262.8~
262.8~
14581 03/18/93 000825 TENECULA CYCLES
REPAIR OF NOTORCYCLE$ 001-170-999-5214
537.51
537.51
14582 03/18/93 000847 K.W. DESIGNS
1~2 03/18/93 000847 K.W. DESIGNS
NEN'S QUILTED JACKETS/B 190-183-905-5300
TAX 190-183-905-5300
475.20
36,83
512.03
VOUCHRE2
03/18/93 16:15
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR
NUMBER DATE NUMBER
14583 03/18/93 000877
14583 03/18/93 000877
lZ~58~ 03/18/93 000882
14585 03/18/93 000900
14586 03/18/93 000901
14587 03/18/93 000902
14588 03/18/93 000904.
14589 03/18/93 000905
14589 03/18/93 000905
14590 03/18/93 000906
CITY OF TENEOULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIGOS
VENDOR
NAME
TENECULA VALLEY ASSISTA
TEMECULA VALLEY ASSISTA
TEMEOULA DOOR & TRIM
REDLANDS CAMERA
CPRS DISTRICT ELEVEN
NO. 50 CENTER C|TY ASSO
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
CDBG REZNB/OPERATION SC
CDBG RE[NB/OPERATZOR SC
DUTCH DOOR FOR CASHIER.
POLARIOD SCHOOL OF LAg
SUPERVISORS ~IRKSHOP
FY 93 BORO PNT FOR SPOR
RIVERSIDE COUNTY CENTEN NATIVE AMER REC BANGUET
TENECULA SHUTTLE SERVIC TRANS FN TEN TO ONTARIO
TENECULA SHUTTLE $ERVIC TRANSPORT FR TEN TO SD
FAMILY FITNESS CENTERS CORP INITIATIOR FEE
TOTAL CHECKS
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
140-199-999-5250
140-1270
001-199-999-5212
001-170-999-5258
190-180-999-5258
280-199-802-5700
001-100-999-5260
001-100-999-5258
001-100-999-5258
001-150-999-5250
ITEM
AMOUNT
4,975.00
3,852.00
200.00
250.00
45.00
45,0~.68
25.00
45.00
55.00
100.00
PAGE 7
CHECK
AMOUNT
8,827.00
200.00
250.00
45.00
45,044.68
25.00
100.00
100.00
123,617.86
VOUCHRE2
03/25/93
16:30
CiTY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIOOS
PAGE
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
100 GAS TAX FUND
190 CONNUN[TY SERVICES DISTRICT
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
300 iNSURANCE FUND
320 iNFORNATZOR SYSTENS
330 COPY CENTER FUND
TOTAL
AMOUNT
34,349.32
5,797.65
8,723.76
924.3~,
8,584.15
1,587.93
360.92
1,091.68
369.26
61,788.79
VOUCHRE2
03/25/93
16:30
C/TY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE 2
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
CHECK
DATE
VENDOR
NUMBER
VENDOR
NAME
]TEN
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
14414
14530
452409
452409
452409
452409
452409
452409
452409
45240~
45240~
452409
452409
452409
452409
45240~
452409
452409
452409
454461
454461
454461
454461
454461
454461
454461
454461
454461
454461
454461
454461
454461
454461
454461
454461
454461
1459~
14597
14598
14600
14601
03/18/93
03/18/93
03/25/93
03/25/93
03125193
03/25/93
03125193
03/25/93
03/25/93
03/25/93
03/25/93
03/25/93
03/25/93
03/25/93
03/25/93
03/25/93
03/25/93
03/25/93
03/25/93
03/25/93
03/25/93
03/25/93
03/25/93
03/25/93
03125193
03/25/93
03/25/93
03/25/93
03/25/93
03/25/93
03/25/93
03/25/93
03/25/93
03/25/93
03/25/93
03/25/93
03/25/93
03/25/93
03/25/93
03/25/93
03/25/93
03/25/93
000911
000444
000444
000444
000~
00044,4
000444
00D444
0004~,.4
000~
000~44
00044~4
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
CITY CLERKS ASSOCIATION
CASSARO, KATHLEEN
EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT
EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT
EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT
EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT
EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT
EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT
EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT
EMPLOYMENT DEVELOP~ENT
EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPENT
EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT
EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT
EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT
EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT
EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT
EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT
EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT
EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT
BANK OF AMERICA
BANK OF AMERICA
BANK OF AMERICA
BANK OF AMERICA
BANK OF AMERICA
BANK OF AMERICA
BANK OF AMERICA
BANK OF AMERICA
BANK OF AMERICA
BANK OF AMERICA
BANK OF AMERICA
BANK OF AMERICA
BANK OF AMERICA
BANK OF AERICA
BANK OF AMERICA
BANK OF ANERICA
BANK OF AMERICA
BUCCIERI, VALER[E
NABAVILLAS, LAURA ·
GRADY, DEBBIE
COFFMAN, KATHERINE
BARNES, KAREN
WILCOX, VIOLA
CCAC INSTALLATION
CASSARO/REFUND
000444 CAIT
000444 CAIT
000~ CAIT
000444 CAIT
000444 CA I T
000444 CAI T
000444 CAIT
000444 CAIT
0004/~ SD[
0004.44 SDI
000444 SDI
000444 SD I
000444 SD I
000~ SD I
000444 SDI
000444 SDI
00028~ FICA/MED
000283 FICA/MED
00028:5 FICA/NED
000283 FICA/MED
000283 FICA/NED
000283 FICA/MED
000283 FICA/MED
000283 FICA/MED
000283 FICA/MED
00028~ USIT
O0021G USIT
000283 USIT
000283 USIT
000283 USIT
000283 USIT
000283 USIT
000283 USIT
BUCCIERI REFUND
NABAVILLAS REFUND
GRADY, DEBBIE REFUND
COFFBAN, KATHERINE REFU
BARNES REFUND
WILCOX, VIOLA REFUND
001-110-999-5260
190-183-4969
001-2070
100-2070
190-2070
191-2070
193-2070
300-2070
320-2070
330-2070
001-2070
100-2070
190-2070
191-2070
192-2070
193-2070
300-2070
320-2070
330-2070
001-2070
100-2070
190-2070
191-2070
192-2070
193-2070
300-2070
320-2070
330-2070
001-2070
100-2070
190-2070
191-2070
193-2070
300-2070
320-2070
330-2070
190-183-4948
190-183-4948
190-183-483~
190-183-4811
190-183-4801
190-183-4801
25.00
2.00
2,319.06
421.89
406.03
15.37
31.92
18.47
48.29
9.54
982.98
197.06
Z39.36
6.22
9.85
22.30
9.24
18.41
19.82
2,199.15
433.19
533.88
13.88
21.98
49.74
20.64
41.08
44.22
9,224.53
2,022.71
1,967.98
63.28
184.03
81.95
226.70
69.89
3.00
6.00
20.00
13.00
26.00
26.00
25.00
2.00
4,775.81
17,198.83
3.00
6.00-
20.00
13.00
26.00
26.
VOUCHRE2
03/25/93
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
14602
14603
14606
14604
14605
14606
14607
14608
14608
14609
16609
14610
14610
14610
1
14612
14612
14612
14612
14612
14612
1~613
14613
14614
16614
14615
14615
14616
16617
16618
1/,618
14618
14618
14618
14618
16:30
CHECK
DATE
03/25/9~
03/25/93
03/25/93
03/25/93
03/25/93
03/25/93
03/25/93
03/25/93
03/25/93
03/25/93
03/25/93
03/25/93
03/25/93
03/25/93
03/25/93
03/25/93
03/25/93
03/25/93
03/25/93
03/25/93
03/25/93
03/25/93
03/25/93
03/25/93
03/25/93
03/25/93
03/25/93
03/25/93
03/25/93
03/25193
03/25/93
03/25/93
03/25/93
03/25/93
03/25/93
VENDOR
NUMBER
000114
000127
000127
000131
000131
000162
000162
000162
000172
000177
000177
000177
000177
000177
000177
000184
000184
000197
000197
000201
000201
000206
000243
0002~6
000246
000246
000246
0002/,6
000246
VENDOR
NAME
BURNEY, THOMAS
BEDFORD PROPERTIES
SALGADO, CARLOS
SALGADO, CARLOS
COLBURN, JAN
NUNGLE, CHARLES
AT&T
CALIFORN]AN
CALIFORNIAN
CARL ~ARREN & CO,
CARL HARREN & CO.
EGGHEAD DISCOUNT SOFTHA
EGGHEAD DISCOUNT SOFTHA
EGGHEAD DISCOUNT SOFTHA
GASB
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GTE
GTE
INSUPCO
INSUPCO
JENNACO
JENNACO
KINKO'S COPIES
PAYLESS DRUG STORE
PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREN
PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREN
PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREN
PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREN
PERS EMPLOYEES' RET]REN
PERS EMPLOYEES' RET]REN
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
BURNEY REFUND FOR PERHI
BEDFORD REFUND/REISSUE
SALGADO REFUND
$ALGADO REFUND
COLBURN REFUND
NUNGLE REFUND
73206960:5/,001 909-694-1
TOO1369RV/TOO2679SS/TO0
LEGAL ADVERTISING FY 92
GRAY STANLEY LOSS 2~3~9
GILLESP[E RAY LOSS 5~30
121129 - QLIICKBOOKS SOF
FRE l GHT
TAX
1 YEAR MEMBERSHIP
TELE PHONE BOOK/CALCA R
MINI FLOPPY DISC
OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR CIT
3 RING BINDER
OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR TCS
ROLL, ADD, & PAPER
909-699-2475 FEB CHARGE
909-699-8632 3/93 NO SE
SP'18TD 6'32 TO 2"'13 T
TAX
JAN 93 TEEN CENTER CLEA
FEB 93 TEEN CENTER CLEA
PAPER
FILM AND BATTERY
000246 PER REDE
0002/,6 PER REDE
000246 PERS RET
0002~ PERS RET
000246 PER$ RET
000246 PER$ RET
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-162-4285
001-2660
001-2290
001-162-4200
190-183-6809
001-170-999-5285
320-199-999-5208
001-120-999-5256
001-120-999-5256
300-199-999-5205
300-199-999-5205
320-199-999-5221
320-199-999-5221
320-199-999-5221
001-160-999-5226
001-162-999-5220
001-140-999-5220
001-120-999-5220
190-180-999-5220
190-180-999-5220
001-160-999-5220
001-16)-999-5208
320-199-999-5208
100-16/,-999-5242
100-164-999-5242
190-182-999-5212
190-182-999-5212
330-199-999-5590
190-180-999-5250
001-2130
100-2130
001-2390
100-2390
190-2390
191-2390
I TEN
AMOUNT
30. O0
141.75
9,99
469.64
40.00
191.00
12.50
133.20
31.75
86.00
45.00
4.50
6.51
110.00
3~.29
26.67
190.16
10.75
46.61
89.26
19.91
17.11
118.70
9.20
400.00
400. O0
8.57
1.67
171.76
10,510.89
1,766.80
2,113.53
69.12
PAGE 3
CHECK
AMOUNT
30. O0
141.75
40.00
191.00
12.50
164.95
131.00
95.01
110.00
397.74
37.02
127.90
800. O0
8.57
1.67
VOUCHRE2
03/25/93
16:30
CiTY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE 6
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
CHECK
DATE
VENDOR
NUMBER
VENDOR
NAME
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
14618 03/25/93 000266 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREN 000266 PERS RET
16618 03/25/93 000266 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000266 PERS RET
16618 03/25/93 000266 PERS EMPLOYEES, RETIREN 000266 PERS RET
1~618 03/Z5/95 000266 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000266 PERS RET
16618 03/25/93 000266 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000266 PERS RET
16618 03/25/93 000266 PERS EMPLOYEES, RETIREN 000266 SURVIVOR
16618 03/25/93 000266 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETZREM 000266 SURVIVOR
16618 03/25/9~ 000266 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREN 000266 SURVIVOR
16618 03/25/93 000266 PERS EMPLOYEES, RETIREM 000266 SURVIVOR
16618 03/25/93 000266 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000266 SURVIVOR
16618 0~/25/93 000266 PERS EMPLOYEES, RETIREM 000266 SURVIVOR
16618 03/25/95 000266 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000266 SURVIVOR
16618 03/25/95 000266 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREN 000266 SURVIVOR
16618 03/25/93 000266 PERS EMPLOYEES, RETIREN 000266 SURVIVOR
16619
16619
16619
16619
14619
14619
16619
16619
16619
16619
1~619
16619
16619
14619
16619
16619
16619
16619
03125193
03125195
03125193
03/25/93
03/25/93
03125193
03/25/93
03/25/93
03/25/93
03/25/93
03/25/93
03/25/93
03/25/93
03/25/93
03/25/93
03/25/95
03125193
03/25/93
000249
000249
000269
000269
000249
000269
000269
000249
000249
000249
000249
000269
000249
000269
000269
000249
000269
000249
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH TCSD
PETTY CASH TC~D
PETTY CASH TCSD
PETTY CASH TCSD
PETTY CASH TCSD
PETTY CASH TCSD
PETTY CASH TCSD
PETTY CASH TCSD
192-2390
193-2390
300-2390
320-2390
330-2390
001-2390
100-2390
190-2390
191-2390
192-2390
193-2390
300-2390
320-2390
330-239o
001-110-999-5258
001-160-999-5220
001-160-999-5258
001-150-999-5260
001-163-999-5220
001-163-999-5258
001-163-999-5260
001-166-999-5650
190-180-999-5220
001-199-6050
190-180-999-5220
190-180-999-5258
190-180-999-5260
190-181-999-5300
190-183-9'~-5300
190-183-819-5300
190-183-938-5300
190-183-964-5300
96.85
265.46
98.66
201.73
215.36
69.56
8.59
12.09
.93
1.~4
.66
.93
1.86
2.00
6.~
33.05
21.55
15.00
29.67
32.36
2.69
2.60
2.69
16.00
50.~
~,27
49.41
4.00
6.90
15,609.34
360.96
14620
14620
14620
14620
14620
14621
14622
14622
14622
14623
14624
14624
14624
03/25/93
03/25/93
03/25/93
03/25/93
03/25/93
03/25/93
03/25/93
03/25/93
03/25/93
03/25/93
03/25/93
03/25/95
03/25/93
000253
000253
000253
000253
000253
000255
000262
000262
000266
000283
000283
000283
POSTMASTER
POSTMASTER
POSTMASTER
POSTMASTER
POSTMASTER
PRO LOCK & KEY
RANCHO WATER
RANCHO k~kTER
RANCHO gATER
RIGHTMAY
BANK OF AMERICA
BANK OF AMERICA
BANK OF AMERICA
ACCT 92~62 03/05/93
ACCT 924462 03/05/93
ACCT 92/,.4.62 03/05/93
ACCT 92,~62 03/05/95
ACCT 926662 03/05/93
DUPLICATE KEYS AND LOCK
WATER CHARGES
MATER CHARGES
MATER CHARGES
SAN HICKS PARK MARCH RE
4798 020000010T/3 CC DO
4798 020000010773 CC DD
6796020000010831SN FEB
001-161-999-5230
001-160-999-5230
190-180-999-5230
001-110-999-5230
001-1990
001-199-999-5212
193-180-999-5260
190-180-999-5260
191-180-999-5260
190-180-999-5238
001-110-999-5258
001-100-999-5258
001-100-999-5258
39.85
9.93
29.90
13.95
27.90
65.16
695.12
179.01
47.63
114.78
587.30
97.01
860.09
121.55
65.16
919.76
114.78
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TENECULA
03/25/93 16:30 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
,~ FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCR/PTIOR NUMBER
ITEM
AHOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
14624 03/25/93 000283 BANK OF AMERICA 4798020000010831Slq FEB 001-100-999-52&0
14624 03/25/93 000283 BANK OF AMERICA 4798020000014270 FEB TS 001-163-999-5260
14625 03/25/93 000302 SYSTEM SOURCE LFF425CLLD 5 DIMIdlER 001-120-999-5600
14625 03125193 000302 SYSTEM SOURCE TAX 001-120-999-5600
13.03
68.14
651.00
50.45
1,625.57
701.45
14626 03/25/93 000309 TENECULA COPIERS
REPAIR/CLEANED/TESTED C 001-171-~-5250
75.00
75.00
14627 03/25/93 000319 TONARK SPORTS, INC. 10350 RECREATIONAL BURY 190-183-906-5300
14627 03/25/93 000319 TONARK SPORTS, INC. FREIGHT 190-183-906-5300
1~627 03/25/93 000319 TONARK SPORTS, INC. TAX 190-183-906-5300
67.00
5.19
76.83
14628 03/25/93 000320 TO~N CENTER STATIONERS INDEX, LGL 001-1~&-999-5242
18.19
18.19
14629 03/25/93 000325 UNITED UAY OF THE INLAN 000325 IN 001-2120
14629 03/25/93 000325 UNITED gAY OF THE INLAN 000325 Ug 100-2120
14629 03/25/93 000325 UNITED gAY OF THE INLAN 000325 IN 190-2120
14629 03/25/93 000325 UNITED gAY OF THE INLAN 000325 IN 300-2120
77.25
9.25
17.50
.50
104.50
14630 03/25/93 000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE RENTAL OF UNIFORMS AND 190-180-999-5243
13.60
13.60
14631 03/25/93 000331 VALLEY MICRO FLOPPY DRIVE 320-199-999-5221
.2 03/25/93 000339 bEST PUBLISHING COMPANY CA CD CONPACT PENAL 199 001-170-999-5220
14633 03/25/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 51779050101020003 1/28-191-180-999-5240
14633 03/25/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 55771260500020004 2/5-3 190-180-999-5240
14633 05/25/93 000374 SOUTHERN CAL[F EDISON 55771267901030003 2/5-3 193-180-999-5240
14633 03/25/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 56777550136020002 2/5-3 191-180-999-5500
14633 03/25/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 57775650934020004 2/8-3 190-180-999-5240
14633 03/25/93 000374 SOUTHERN CAL]F EDISON 57775656701020002 2/8-3 193-180-999-5240
14633 03/25/93 000374 SOUTHERN CAL]F EDISON 57775656802030009 2/8-3 193-180-999-5240
14633 03/25/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF ED]SON 57775663324020005 2/8-3 193-180-999-5240
14633 03/25/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 57777802489030007 2/6-3 193-180-999-5240
14633 03/25/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 5777"/808742030007 1/9-2 193-180-999-5240
14633 03/25/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 57777808740030009 2/6-3 193-180-999-5240
14633 03/25/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 57777808742030007 2/6-3 193-180-999-5240
14633 03/25/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 59774160080020003 2/10-191-180-999-5500
14633 03/25/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 59774162307020006 2/10-191-180-999-5500
14633 03/25/93 OOO374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 5977416450501OOO3 2/10-191-180-999-5500
14633 03/25/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 59777992338030005 2/10-193-180-999-5240
14633 03/25/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 59777992504030003 2/10-193-180-999-5240
14633 03/25/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON · 59777993303010006 2/10-193-180-999-5240
14633 03/25/93 OO0374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 59777994083020009 10/7-193-180-999-5240
14633 03/25/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 59777994083020009 11/7-193-180-999-5240
14633 03/25/93 000374 SOUTHERN CAL]F EDISON 59777994083020009 12/10 193-180-999-5240
14633 03/25/93 000374 SOUTHERN CAL]F EDISON 59777994083020009 1/12-193-180-999-5240
14633 03/25/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 59777994083020009 2/10-193-180-999-5240
14633 03/25/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 59777994085030006 2/10-193-180-999-5240
14633 03/25/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 59778025414030000 2/10-193-180-999-5240
14633 03/25/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 59778051021030001 2/10-193-180-999-5240
74.35
129.30
50.04
13.~
'13.44
147.08
13.25
13.24
13.13
13.13
13.65
23.79
13.54
13.66
116.36
122.53
165.28
12,58
12.58
12.58
13.43-
13,20
13.20
12,38
12.47
13.16
13.62
126.99
74.35
129.30
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA
03/25/93 16:30 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE 6
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NUMBER DATE NLJNBER NAME DESCRIPTZOR NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
146~3 03/25/93 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 5977805562~030006 2/10-193-180-999-5260
13.01
987.90
14~34 03/25/93 000375 SOUTHERN CALZF TELEPHON ~)9-202-4756TH 001-110-9~-5208
14634 03/25/93 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON · 619-560-4601 JAM NJN 001-140-999-5208
14634 03/25/93 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHOR 619-540-4601 JAN MJM 001-160-999-5208
14634 03/25/93 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 716-287-4840 BB 001-163-999-5208
14634 03/25/93 000375 SOUTHERN CAL]F TELEPHOR 909-202-4752 FEB SN 190-180-999-5208
14634 03/25/93 OO0375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHOR 909-202-6753 BH FEB 190-180-999-5208
14654 03/25/93 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 909-202-6755 VAN FEB 190-180-999-5208
14654 03/25/93 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHOR 909-202-4764 FEB JH 001-163-999-5208
55.16
56.66
2.91
40.20
131.6~
47.32
47.65
84.32
463.64
14635 03/25/93 000377 STATE DEPT. OF TRANSPOR SIGNALS & LIGHTS 9/92
14635 03/25/93 000377 STATE OEPT. OF TRANSPOR SIGNALS & LIGHTS 1/93
100-164-999-5405
100-166-999-5~05
~.60
114.92
183.32
14636 03/25/93 000389 USCN 000389 PT RETIR 001-2160
14~6 03/25/93 000389 USCM 000389 PT RETIR 100-2160
14636 03/25/9] 000389 USCN 000389 PT RETIR 190-2160
103.88
138.00
250.68
492.56
14637 03125193 000414 LORGS DRUG STORE 522400 & 522425 190-180-999-5220
146~7 03/25/9] 000414 LORGS DRUG STORE 523734 190-180-999-5220
14637 03/25/93 000414 LORGS DRUG STORE POLOROID 600 FILM 1~0-180-9~-5220
144537 03/Z5/93 000414 LONGS DRUG STORE FILM GB-26 190-180-999-5220
14638 03/25/93 000~23 H & H CRAFT & FLORAL SU SUPPLIES
190-180-999-5300
14639 03/25/93 000z~6 VISIOR COHNUNICATIOR SE ETE 160-2 16 BUTTOR LCO 320-199-999-5208
14639 03/25/93 000446 VISIOR COHItlNICATIOR SE FREIGHT 320-199-999-5208
14639 03/25/93 000~46 VZSIOR COI4MUNICATION SE TAX 320-199-999-5208
10.97
6.75
21.00
10.32
38.42
285.00
9.00
22.09
49.04
38 .~,.
316.09
14640 03/25/93 000447 CONTRORIX OF HEMET BENDIX KING LMX-1101 80 001-171-999-5610
14640 03/25/93 0004J,7 CONTRONZX OF HEMET ALINCO $R-60 RADIO INTE 001-171-999-5610
14640 03/25/93 0004~7 CONTRONIX OF HEMET CABLE SET-RADIOS TO INT 001-171-999-5610
14640 03/25/93 000447 CONTRORIX OF HENET TPS-PS-30 DC/CHARGER SU 001-171-g~9-5610
14640 03/25/9] 000447 COMTRORIX OF HEMET POWERSONIC GEL 12 VOLT 001-171-~99-5610
14640 03/25/93 0004~7 CONTRONIX OF HEMET 1315 50' LOW LOSS CABLE 001-171-999-5610
14640 03/25/93 000~7 CONTRORIX OF HEMET NAXRAD MFB-8355 800 MHZ 001-171-999-5610
14640 03/25/93 000~7 COIqTRORIX OF HEMET ANTENNA NOUNTING NARDWA 001-171-999-5610
14640 03/25/93 0013~7 CONTRORIX OF HEMET STEEL CABINET FOR EOUIP 001-171-999-5610
146~0 03/25/93 0006~7 CONTRONIX OF HEMET TAX 001-171-999-5610
600.00
853.00
50.00
170.00
545.00
75.00
152.00
137.50
350.00
211.77
2,944.27
14641 03/25/93 000473 CALIFORNIA REDEVELOPteEN CA REDV ASSOC CONF/DD 001-110-999-5258
140.00
160.00
14642 03/25/93 000516 PRENTICE RALL, INC. 424~ HOt,/TO SAY IT CL 001-150-~-5228
40.85
40.85
14643 03/25/93 000518 DEL RIO CARE ANINAL HOS VET SERVICES
001-170-999-5285
25.00
25.00
14644 03/25/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFONNIA EDI 437707?383802 2/1-2/28 191-180-999-5500
14644 03/25/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI 4377077520001 11/20-2/2 192-180-qq9-5500
14644 03/25/93 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI 4377077524801 1/31-2/28 191-180-~-5500
14645 03/25/93 000545 PAC TEL CELLULAR - S.D. ACCT SD-1075255
320-199-999-5208
8.75
8,454.54
98.38
39.48
8,561.67
VOUCHRE2
03/25/93 16:30
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE
14645 03/25/93
14646 03/25/93
14647 03/25/93
14647 03/25/93
1~7 03/25/93
14647 03/25/93
14647 03/25/93
14648 03/25/93
14648 03/25/93
14649 03/25/93
14650 03/25/93
14651 03/25/93
14652 03/25/93
14652 03/25/93
~53 03/25/93
.... J4 03/25/93
1/,655 03/25/93
14656 03/25/93
14657 03/25/93
CITY OF TENEOULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VENDOR VENDOR
NUMBER NAME
000545 PAC TEL CELLULAR - S.D.
000649 MUNOZ, SAL J.
000704 SKS, INC./INLAND OIL
000704 SKS, ]NC./INLANO OIL
000704 SKS, INC./INLAND OIL
000704 SKS, INC./INLAND OIL
000704 SKS, INC,/INLAND OIL
000724 A & R CUSTOM SCREEN PRI
000724 A & R OUSTON SCREEN PRI
000730 EDVALSON, HARI40(X)
000825 TEMECULA CYCLES
0008~7 STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
000864 CORONA CLAY CO.
000864 CORONA CLAY CO.
000905 TEMECULA SHUTTLE SERVIC
00090~ NANDALAY BEACH RESORT
000912
000914
000915
ITEM ACCOUNT
DESCRIPTION NUMBER
ACCT S0-1073255
REPLACE CK 12245 / LOST
001-1A0-~4~-5208
001-100-~-5258
FUEL 001-110-999-5263
FUEL 1~0-180-~4~-5263
FUEL 001-163-~9~-5263
FUEL 100-164-~99-526~
FUEL 001-162-~-5263
50 EA. TEEN FEST T-SHIR
TAX
LODG]NG/RTC CONF gE
HOUND MIX; CLAY NATERIA
TAX
SERVICE
HOTEL CCAC CONF JG
CITY CLERKS ASSOC. OF C CONF REGIST CCAC ANNUAL
CNOA REGISTRATION/LAB INVEST
NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIA MEMBERSHIP (2)
190-183-933-5300
190-183-933-5300
001-110-~-5258
FIX OIL LEAK/R&R RUBBER 001-170-~-5214
0008~7 FItAN TAX 100-2140
190-180-99~-5212
1~0-180-~-5212
001-100-9~-5258
001-120-~-5258
001-120-~-5258
001-170-~-5258
001-120-~-5226
TOTAL CHECKS
I T EM
AMOUNT
10.84
48.48
69.46
83.34
99.36
152.15
22.22
306. O0
136.25
148.50
164.83
750.00
58.13
45.00
103.55
195.00
125,00
90. O0
PAGE 7
CHECK
AMOUNT
50.32
48.48
426.53
329.72
136.25
148.50
808.13
45.00
103.55
195.00
125.00
90.00
61,788.79
VOUCHRE2
04/01/93
16:47
CITY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOP ALL PERIOO$
PAGE
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
100 GAS TAX FUND
190 COIIRJNITY SERVXCES DISTRICT
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND
250 CAPXTAL PROJECTS - TCSD
280 REDEVELOPNENT AGENCY -
300 INSURANCE FUND
320 INFORMATION SYSTENS
330 COPY CENTER FUND
TOTAL
A!~UNT
116,990.70
11,010.85
3,868.95
231,619.71
62,689.02
29,1331.55
12,517.00
10,128.75
1,432.05
4?6,888.58
VOUCHRE2
0~1/93
16:47
CiTY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERZOOS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR
NUNBER DATE NUNBER
VENDOR iTEN ACCOUNT
NANE DESCRIPTION NUMBER
ITEM
ANQUNT
CHECK
AHOUNT
147'~7 04/13/93
SEE, NELISSA
SEE PW DEPOSIT REFUND 001-2690
7,000.00
7,000.00
14738 04/13/93 000123
14738 04/13/93 000123
14738 04/13/93 000123
14738 04/13/93 000123
14738 04/13/93 000123
14738 04/13/93 000123
14738 04/13/9'~ 00012]
14738 04/13/93 000123
14738 04/13/93 000123
BURKE VILLIAHS & $OREN$
BURKE W/LLiANS & $ORENS
BURKE VILLZANS & SORENS
BURKE WiLLINqS & SORENS
BURKE WILLIANS & SORENS
BURKE VILLZANS & SORENS
BURKE WILLiAMS & SORENS
BURKE WILLIANS & SORENS
BURKE WILLIANS & SORENS
LEGAL SERV/FEB
PROF SERVICES THROUGH 1
PROF SERVICES THROUGH 1
PROF SERVICES THROUGH 1
ENG FLOOO/PROF SERVICES
PROF SERVICES THRU 2/28
LEGAL SERV./FEB.
LEGAL SERV./FEB.
LEGAL SERV/FEB
001-130-999-52~
001-130-~-5246
001-1280
190-180-~-52~6
001-16&-~-5246
001-130-999-5246
001-130-~-5246
001-1990
001-130-~-52~6
3,150.00
15,818.69
560.07
1,188.95
540.50
1,710.60
3,902.13
1,431.69
5,336.27
33,638.90
14739 04/13/93 000146 COUNTS UNLIMITED
14739 04/13/93 0001~6 COUNTS UNLIMITED
14739 04/13/93 0001/,6 COUNTS UNLIMITED
14739 04/13/93 000146 COUNTS UNLIMITED
14T39 04/13/93 000146 COUNTS UNLIMITED
14740 04/13/93 000161 EDEN SYSTEMS, INC,
14740 04/13/93 000161 EDEN SYSTEMS, INC.
LICENSE PLATE SURVEYS
24 HR. DIRECTIONAL COUN
SPEED CHECKS
TURNING NOVEMENT COUNTS
10% DISCOUNT
INSTALLATION/NAINT & SU
HAKE CHANGES TO BARSBIL
100-164-~-5406
100-1(~-999-5406
100-164-~9~-5406
100-164-~-5406
100-164-~-5406
320-1980
001-140-~-524.B
900.00
750.00
675.00
1,080.00
340.50-
1,478.13
1,687.50
3,064.50
3,165.63
14741 04/13193 000178 GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO 386SL-ZSMHZ PC NOTEBOOK
/'-74104/13/93 000178 GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO DIFFERENCE IN TAX &
;1 04/13/93 OOO178 GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO TAX
'~f41 04/13/93 000178 GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO TAX
1474104/13/93 000178 GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO NOTEBOOK COMPUTER
001-171-999-560~
001-171-~-5604
001-171-999-560~
001-171-~-5604
320-1970
1,250. O0
26.94
24.22
72.(~
4,040.62
5,414.44
14742 04/13/93 000231 NBS/LOVRY RETENTION DUE 100-2035
1;500.00
1,500.00
14743 04/13/93 0002]2 JOHN P, NEET, HA1
LUTHERAN CHURCH EXTENS/210-199-128-5700
3,000.00
3,000.00
14744 04113193 0002]8 FINAL TOUCH NARKETING TRADESHOM EXPENSES 280-199-999-5264
14744 04/13/93 000238 FINAL TOUCH NARKETING TRN)ESHOWS-MESCON 93 & 280-199-9~-5264
14744 04/13/93 000238 FINAL TOUCH NARKETING 1993 HARKETXNG PROGRNq 280-199-~-5264
14744 04/13/93 000238 FINAL TOUCH HARKETING 1993 HARKETING PROGRAN 280-199-9f9-5264
559.88
2,650.00
23,155.00
2,666.67
29,031.55
14745 04/13/93 000240 ORANGE COUNTY STRIPING CITYWIDE STRIPING & STE 100-164-999-5410
14745 04/13/93 000240 ORANGE COUNTY STRIPING ENERGENCY RESTRIPIMG AM 001-166-999-5410
3,476.67
6,336.50
9,813.17
14746 04/13/93 000257 RANTEK CITY VIDE CLEAN-UP & ST 001-16&-999-5402
14746 04/13/93 000257 RANTEK EMERGENCY k~RK 001-1278
14746 04/13/93 000257 RANTEK CITY~IDE CLEAN-UP 001-16&-999-5402
14746 04/13/93 000257 RANTEK CITYWIDE CLEAN-UP "FLCO 001-166-999-5401
14746 04/13/93 000257 RAHTEK SCHEDULED STREET HAINT. 100-164-999-5402
2,786.86
4,051.~8
6,318.62
1,727.05
92.08
14,976.09
14747 04113193 000269 RIVERSIDE OFFICE SUPPLY HIGH QUALITY REGULAR BO 330-199-~(~9-5590
14747 04/13/93 O00Z&9 RIVERSIDE OFFICE SUPPLY TAX 330-199-g9~-5590
14747 04/13/93 000269 RIVERSIDE OFFICE SUPPLY XEROX PAPER 330-199-g99-5220
1,077.00
83.47
271.58
1,432.05
14768 04/13/93 000270 RJM DESIGN GROUP RJM DESIGN GROUP 250-190-129-5802
~,Z~8 04/13/93 000270 RJM DESIGN GROUP RJM DESIGN GROUP 250-190-129-5802
\
~&2.00
500.00
VOUCHRE2
04/01/93 16:47
C/TY OF TEHECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK: CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEN ACCOUNT
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER
14748 04/13/93 000270 RJN DESIGN GROUP
SURVEY JAM 91
250-190-129-5802
14749 04/13/93 000354 RIVERSIDE COUNTY HEALTH JANUARY 1993 ANIMAL CON 001-172-999-5255
14750 04113193 000406 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF SECURITY FOR ROD RUN 001-2270
14751 04/13/93 0004~(, SIERRA COMPUTER SYSTEHS SIERRA PERHITS UPGRADE 320-1980
14751 04/13/93 000434 SIERRA COMPUTER SYSTEHS SOFT~/ARE PRORLEN RESOLU 320-199-999-5250
14751 04/13/93 000434 SIERRA CONPUTER SYSTENS TAM 320-1980
14752 04113193 000481 GEOTECHNICAL & ENVZRONN DESILTING OF LAKE VILLA 300-199-999-5207
14753 04113193 000482 LEIGHTON & ASSOCIATES
14754 04/13/93 000523 E.N.W.D.
14755 04/13/93 000538 R.J. NOBLE CONPANY
14755 04/13/93 000538 R.J. HORLE COMPANY
14755 04/13/93 000538 R.J. NOBLE COMPANY
14755 04/13/93 000538 R.J. NOBLE CORPANY
CONSULTANT SERVICES/OCT 250-190-129-5804
SEWER FEES FOR THE CRC 250-190-129-5804
MARGARITA ROAD EXTENSIO 210-165-60&-5804
NARGARITA ROAD EXTENSIO 210-165-606-5804
MARGARITA ROAD EXTENSIO 210-165-606-5804
RETENTION 210-2035
14756 04/13/93 000539 gINHER YANADA ASSOCIATE FEBRUARY SERVICES 210-190-120-5802
14757 04/13/93 000660 R.g. CASH CONSTRUCTION R.~. CASH CONSTRUCTION 250-190-129-5804
14757 04/13/93 O00ddO R.U. CASH CONSTRUCTION RETENTZOR 250-2035
14758 04113193 000687 ROGERS ENGINEERING
14759 04/13/93 000757 CORCZSE CONSTRUCTION
14759 04/13/93 000757 CONCISE CONSTRUCTION
14760 04/13/93 000764 FENCING BY BUZZ
RE-SURVEY PALA PARK RD 001-16~-Q99-5423
BUILDING PORTION OF PRO 210-199-801-5804
RETENTION 210-2035
INSTALLATION OF FENCING 190-180-999-5212
1476104/13/93 000855 PB BEDlENT & ASSOCIATES FLOOD STUDY
14762 04/13/93 000883 MONTELEONE EXCAVATING
14763 04/13/93 000884 LARUE PAINTING
14764 04/13/93 000903 NISPAGEL, DANIEL J.
14765 04/13/93 000913 GOQOHE~ AMBULANCE SERVI CFD STAND BY / FLOOD
14765 04/13/93 000913 GOCl)NE~ AMBULANCE SERVI CDF STAND BY / FLOOD
14765 04/13/93 000913 GOODHE1,/AMBULANCE SERVI CDF STANDBY / FLO00
14765 04/13/93 000913 GOODHEld AMBULANCE SERV[ CDF STAND BY / FLOCO
14766 04113193 000921 AETNA CASUALTY AND SURE INSURANCE/FEB.
100-164-999-5401
LABOR & MATERIALS 3/1-3 001-1278
GEAFFITI REMOVAL;JANUAR 001-170-999-5293
CONSULTING/TEN AUTO PAR 001-110-999-5248
001-166-999-5465
001-166-999-5465
001-166-999-5465
001-166-999-5465
300-199-99~-5204
14767 04/13/93 OO0923 UTAH-PACIFIC CONSTRUCTI TRAFFIC CONTROL/2/6-2/1 001-1278
14768 04/13/93 000926 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON POWER LINES FOR CRC 250-190-129-5804
ITEH
AMOUNT
3,557.7&
7,047.62
5,917.85
4,000.00
300.00
310.00
5,380.00
10,875.50
28,015.00
54,678.00
70,000.00
34,455.34
15,913.33'
41,475.00
15,638.00
1,563.80-
4,500.00
48,583.00
4,858.30'
2,680.00
2,877.60
19,747.25
2,835.00
2,600,00
255.00
270.00
630.00
135.00
7,137.00
7,321.20
5,004.58
PAGE 3
CHECK
AMOUNT
4,519.74
7,047.62
5,917.85
4,610.00
5,380.00
10,875.50
28,015.00
143,220,01
41,475.00
14,074,20"
4,500.00
2,680.00
2,877.60
19,747.25
2,835.00
2,SO0.O0
1 ,~90.00
7, 137. O0
7,321.20
5,004r~""'\
TOTAL CHECKS 476,888.58
VOUCHRE:~
04,~1/93
15:44
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
100 GAS TAX FUND
190 CONNUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
1;3 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND
300 INSURANCE FUND
310 VEHICLES FUND
320 ]NFORNATIOR SYSTEMS
330 COPY CENTER FUND
TOTAL
ANgX~NT
308,996.16
828.5A
8,011.38
172.83
1,300.00
606.60
61.43
3,126.26
3,220.32
326,121.52
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TENECtJLA
04/01/93 15:44 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE 2
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER
ITEM
AHOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
1~415 03/29/9~ 000857 RANCHO ARMY/NAVY STORE MISC GOOOS FOR USAR TEA 001-166-9~9-5242
14671 04/01/93 DAVIS, YOLANDA DAVID$ CLASS REFUND 190-183-4948
367.21
3.00
367.21
3.00
14672 04/01/93 ADKISOR, CYND]
ADKISON CLASS REFUND 190-185-4948
6.00
6.00
14673 04/01/93 CERVERA, EDWARD *CERVERA LOSS CLAIM 39 300-199-999-5207
100.00
100.00
14674 04/01/93 OLSON, LAURETTA OLSON TRIP REFUND 190-183-4938
29.00
29.00
14675 04/01/93 MC CASLIN, DEBRA MC CASLIN, CLASS REFUND 190-183-4968
4.00
4.00
14676 04/01/93 DAWSON, THELMA DAWSON CLASS REFUND 190-183-48~7
1/,677 04/01/93 RIFKIN, HERB RIFKIN CLASS REFUND 190-183-4847
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
1~678 04/01/93 TAYLOR, BEA
TAYLOR CLASS REFUND 190-183-4847
20.00
20.00
14679 04/01/93 TAFOYO, BERNADINE
TAFOYO CLASS REFUND 190-18~-48~
50.00
50.00
14680 04/01/93 PINO, MICHAEL PINO/REIMB HELMETS 001-170-999-5285
1/,68104/01/93 0001O1 APPLE ONE TEMPORARY HELP 3/13 001-120-999-5118
14682 04/01/93 000107 ALHAMBRA GROUP REPRODUCTION COSTS 001-1280
14683 04/01/93 000127 CALIFORNIAN PUBLIC NOTICES 001-161-999-5256
73.23
100.68
10.80
108.41
loo./'~
108.41
1/~ 04/01/9~ 000130 CANYON REPROGRAPHICS
14684 04/01/93 000130 CANYON REPROGRAPHICS
COPIES OF THE ZONING HA 001-161-999-5224
TAX 001-161-999-5224
22.73
1.76
24.51
14685 04/01/93 000131 CARL WARREN & OD. LAKE VILLAGE 300-199-999-5205
14686 04/01/93 OOO138 CITICORP NORTH AMERICA APRIL PAYMENT 320-199-999-5560
1~>86 04/01/93 OO0138 CIT]CORP NORTH M4ERICA APRIL PAYMENT 320-199-999-5250
1/,686.04/01/93 OOO138 CIT]CORP NORTH AMERICA APRIL PAYMENT 320-2800
14687 04/01/93 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT INDEX TABS & BNDR 001-140-999-5220
14687 04/01/93 000177 GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES B&$ 001-162-999-5220
14688 04/01/93 000197 INSUPCO 3/4-10X 3/4 SOC SET SCR 100-164-999-5218
1/4688 04/01/93 000197 INSUPCO 3/8-16X I HHCS GR5 PLTD 100-164-999-5218
14688 04/01/93 000197 INSUP(O 1/4-20 HX NUT GR5 PLTD 100-164-999-5218
14688 04/01/93 000197 INSUPCO 5/16-18 HX NUT GR5 PLTD 100-164-999-5218
14688 04/01/93 000197 INSUPCO 3/8-16 NX NUT GR5 PL11) 100-164-999-5218
14688 04/01/93 000197 INStJPOD 1/2-13 HX NUT GR5 PLTD 100-164-999-5218
1/4688 04/01/93 O0O197 INSUPCO USS FLAT WASHER ORS PLT 100-164-999-5218
14688 04/01/93 000197 INSUPCO 3/8 USS FLAT WASHER GR5 100-164-999-5218
14688 04/01/93 000197 INSUPCO LBX(5000) 3/8 X 10~ ST 100-164-999-5218
14688 04/01/93 000197 INSUPCO AA ALKALINE BATTERIES 100-164-999-5218
14688 04/01/93 000197 INSUPCO M)40 16 OZ. AERASOL SPR 100-164-999-5218
303.50
385.60
142.66
1,041.97
~4.11
67.58
42.73
11.27
3.65
5.22
6.71
14.72
8.16
17.29
14.06
22.50
40.20
303.50
1,570.23
111.69
VOUCHRE2
04/01/93 15:44
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK
NLIMBER DATE
16688 041011955
14~B 04/01/955
14688 04/01/955
16688 04/01/93
16688 04101193
16689 06/01/955
16690 04/01/955
14691 04/01/955
16692 06/01/955
16692 04/01/955
166955 04/01/955
14696 04/01/955
16695 04/01/93
1~695 04/01/93
04/01/955
,-,.~7 06/01/955
16697 04/01/93
16698 04/01/955
16699 06/01/955
16~00 04/01/955
14701 04/01/93
16701 04/01/955
16701 04/01/955
16702 06/01/955
14702 04/01/9:3
14702 04/01/955
147055 04/01/955
16704 04/01/955
14704 04/01/93
14705 04/0 1/955
14705 04/01/955
14706 04/01/955
CITY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VENDOR VENDOR ITEN
NUHBER NANE DESCRIPTION
000197 INSUPCO 409 CLEANER WH.S.D.S
000197 INSUPCO WINDEX GLASS CLEANER
000197 INSUPCO VEHICLE WASH SOAP
000197 INSUPCO 6' FIBERGLASS STEP LADD
000197 INSUPCO TAX
000205 KIDS PARTIES, ETC. NOI4NY & HE
000206 KINKO'S COPIES
000214 LUNCH & STUFF CATERING
000219 NARTIN 1-HOUR PHOTO
000219 HARTIN 1-HOUR PHOTO
BEV STORE/COPIES
CATERING COUNCIL
FILN, DEVELOPMENT, SLID
FILN & DEVELOPNENT/FLO0
000248 PETROLANE FUEL/B&S
000275 RONERO, LUCI
REINB OAL BOARD LUNCH/C
000285 SIR SPEEDY 5 BOXES OF #10 WINDOW E
000285 SIR SPEEDY TAX
000326 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE
000362 WINDSOR PARTNERS - RANC
000342 WINDSOR PARTNERS - RANC
000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI
0005549 ZIMMERLE, STEVE
0005560 GREEK, HAROLD F.
0O0375
000375
000375
000611
000411
000411
2-SETS OF UNIFORHS; CLE
RENT/APRIL
CREDIT OR FEES
5100 XEROX LEASE AGREEN
TUITION REINBURSENENT
PROF SERVICES/55/93
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHOR 909-202-6762/HE
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHOR 909-202-6767 FEB GT
SOUTHERN CALZF TELEPHOR 909-202-6770/HE
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FL000
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD
000418 RIVERSIDE COUNTY CLERK
000423 H & H CRAFT & FLORAL SU
000423 H & H CRAFT & FLORAL SU
2/13-2/19 NURRIETA CK C
2/20-2/26 NURRIETA CK C
HURRIETA CHANNEL CLEAN-
NOTICE OF DETERN]NAT]ON
RECREATION SUPPLIES
RECREATION SUPPLIES
000478 FAST SIGNS 4'X 8' SIGN TO BE USED
000478 FAST SIGNS TAX
000492 McLARNEY, RARY JANE
REINB CELLULAR PHONE AD
ACCOUNT
NUNBER
100-164-999-5218
100-166-999-5218
100-164-999-5218
100-164-999-5218
100-164-999-5218
190-183-800-5300
330-199-999-5590
001-100-999-5260
001-166-999-5250
001-166-999-5250
001-162-999-5263
001-150-999-5260
001-160-999-5220
001-160-999-5220
100-164-999-5263
001-199-999-5234
001-199-999-52556
330-199-999-5582
001-150-999-5259
190-180-999-5250
001-100-999-5208
001-161-999-5208
001-110-999-5208
001-166-999-5620
001-166-999-5620
001-166-999-5420
210-190-120-5802
190-180-999-5300
190-180-999-55500
001-199-999-5266
001-199-999-52z~.
001-160-999-5242
]TEN
AHOUNT
52.55
41.20
10./k8
77.11
28.51
50.00
125 .~4
90.00
165.58
5507.41
115.25
80.40
120.69
9.~
12.50
33,906.93
4,477.79-
2,958.11
400.00
777.50
74.67
149.06
7,713.93
93,421.21
1,300.00
70.08
19.64
218,556
16.92
555.88
PAGE 3
CHECK
ANOUNT
396.36
50.00
125.64
90. O0
472.99
115.25
80.40
129.83
12.50
29,427.14
2,958.11
400.00
T/7.50
303.63
269,859.96
1,300. O0
89.52
235.28
53.88
VOUCHRE2
04/01/93 15
CITY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE 4
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE
VENDOR
NUMBER
VENDOR
NAME
ITEN
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
14707 04/01/95
14707 04/01/93
14707 04/01/93
14707 04/01/9~
14707 04/01/93
14707 04/01/93
14708 04/01/93
14709 ~/01/93
1~710 04/01/93
1~711 ~/01/~
1~712 04/01/93
1~712 04/01/93
1~713 ~/01/93
1~71~ ~/01/93
1~715 ~/01/93
1~715 ~/01/93
1~715 ~/01/93
1~715 ~/01/~
1~715 ~/01/93
1~716 ~/01/93
1~717 ~/01/93
1~718 ~/01/9~
1~718 ~/01/93
1~718 ~/01/9~
1~718 ~/01/9~
1~719 04/01/93
1~0 ~/01/9~
14721 ~/01/9~
14~2 ~/01/93
1~ ~/01/93
1~ ~/01/93
1~ ~/01/93
1~5 ~/01/93
000508
000508
000508
000508
000508
000508
000542
000545
000558
000580
000583
000583
000596
000603
0006~2
000642
000642
0006~2
000642
000653
0O0667
000704
000704
00070~
00070~
SAFEGUARD BUSINESS SYST
SAFEGUARD BUSINESS SYBT
SAFEGUARD BUSINESS SYST
SAFEGUARD BUSINESS SYST
SAFEGUARD BUSINESS SYST
SAFEGUARD BUSINESS SYST
DISNEYLAND
PAC TEL CELLULAR - S.D.
ADVANCED NOBILCONN
PHOTO M OAKS
RANCHO RUNNERS
RANCHO RUNNERS
LEAGUE OF CA C]TIES/LAF
CABLE & MIRELESS CONNUN
CITY OF TENECULA - FLEX
CITY OF TEHECULA - FLEX
CITY OF TEMECULA - FLEX
CITY OF.TEMECULA - FLEX
CITY OF TEMECULA - FLEX
LUCKY STORE
P.A.P.A.
SKS, INC./INLAND OIL
SKS, INC./INLAND OIL
SKS, INC./INLAND OIL
SKS, INC./INLAND OIL
000730 EDVALSON, HARi~)OD
000731 NATIONAL SEMINARS GROUP
000745 AT & T - CELLULAR
000751 SKILLPATH, INC.
000752 STONE, JEFFREY E.
000752 STONE, JEFFREY E.
000866 SKATE CITY
000868 EMBASSY SUITE HOTEL
PAYROLL/GENERAL ACCT.CH
FLEXIBLE BENEFIT CHECKS
FREIGHT
FREIGHT
TAN
TAX
ADVENTURE DAY CAMP
SD1075255031593/MJ
BASE UNIT RENTAL/APRIL
FZLM PROCESSING FOR FIR
lIESSINGER SERVICE/FEB
MESS]NGER SERVICE/MAR.
CS & PARKS & REC COHH C
ACA8114361/NAR
FLEX BENEFITS FOR P/R 3
FLEX BENEFITS FOR P/R 3
FLEX BENEFZTS FOR P/R 3
FLEX BENEFITS FOR P/R 3
FLEX BENEFITS FOR P/R 3
SNACKS/ADVENTURE DAY CA
PESTZClDE APPLICATION M
FUEL 2/15-2/25/93
FUEL 2/15-2/25/95
FUEL 2/15-2/25/93
FUEL 2/15-2/25/93
REIMB MEALS, NILEAGE/HE
HOM TO iMAGE CONFLICT
619-987-1828- I/NJ
GRAMHER, USAGE & tilTIN
NAT'L LEAGUE OF CITIES
REIMB YOSEMITE CONF-2/2
I NSTRUCTOR/SKAT ! NG
HOTEL/CONFERENCE APRIL
081-140-999-5222
001-150-999-5222
001-140-999-5222
001-150-999-5222
001-140-999-5222
001-150-999-5222
190-183-966-5300
001-140-999-5208
001-199-999-5209
001-171-999-5250
001-140-999-5210
001-140-999-5210
190-180-999-5258
320-199-999-5208
001-1020
190-1020
193-1020
300-1020
330-1020
190-183-966-5300
190-180-999-5258
100-164-999-5263
001-110-999-5263
190-180-999-5263
001-162-999-5263
001-110-999-5258
001-140-999-5258
001-140-999-5208
001-163-999-5258
001-100-999-5258
001-100-999-5258
190-183-972-5500
190-180-999-5258
55.01
65. O0
2.28
2.27
4.50
326.10
63.75
195.30
31.00
135.00
165.00
820. O0
1,556.03
3,367.54
412.73
172.83
1.10
100.00
200.00
35.00
419.68
38.32
17.06
25.23
147.00
1.16
198.00
194.30
200.05
86.40
54~.50
129.95
326.10
65.75
195.30
31.00
300.00
820.00
1,556.03
4,054.20
200.00
35.00
561.74
25.25
147.00
1.16
198.00
394.35
86.40
VOUCHRE2
04/0..~1/93 15: 4./,
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK
NUHBER DATE
1/,726 0~,/01/93
14727
lz~727 04101193
14727 0A/01/93
14727 04/01/93
14728 04/01/93
14729 04/01/93
14.730 04/01/9;3
14731 0z,/01/93
1~.732 04/01/93
14733 0~/01/93 000925
VENDOR VENDOR
NUMBER NN4E
000878 BOYS & GIRLS CLUB
000907 TEMECULA CAR MASH
000907 TEHECULA CAR HASH
000907 TEMECULA CAR gASH
000907 TEMECULA CAR HASH
000910
000~16
000918
000920
MARY MITCHELL TRUST, TH
BANK OF AMERICA - CC
OAK-R/DGE INTERNATIONAL
KIDSPACE
000922 UNIVERSAL STUDIOS
GSSP
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
/TEN
DESCRIPTION
2MD DISBURSEMENT OF FUN
OIL CHANGES AND CAR ~AS
LUBE & OIL B&S
LUDE & OIL TCSD
LUBE & OIL TCSD
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-1500
310-164-f9~-5214
310-162-999-5214
310-180-;-5214
310-180-~9~-5214
APRIL RENT 190-182-~-523~
4798020000010110 FEB CH 001-162-~-5258
PAPER DRILL
ADVENTURE DAYCANP/TICKE
ADVENTURE DAY CNqP/TZCK
DOgN PYMT ON FLOAT ART~
330-199-999-5242
190-183-966-5300
190-183-966-5300
190-183-96z,-5300
TOTAL CHECKS
ITEM
AMOUNT
1,894.64
A.O0
19.35
19.35
18.73
3,374.95
227.~j)
36.i'7
75.00
231.00
750.00
PAGE 5
CHECK
AMOUNT
1,894.64
61.43
3,374.95
227.~
36.77
75.00
231.00
750.00
326,121.52
ITEM
NO.
4
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
Mary Jane McLarney, Finance Officer
April 13, 1993
City Treasurer's Report as of February 28, 1993
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive and file the City Treasurer's
report as of February 28, 1993.
DISCUSSION: Reports to the City Council regarding the City's investment
portfolio and receipts, disbursements and fund balance are required by Government
Code Sections 53646 and 41004 respectively. The City's investment portfolio is in
compliance with the Code Sections as of February 28, 1993.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
ATTACHMENT:
City Treasurer's Report as of February 28, 1993
City of Temecula
City Treasurer's Report
As of February 28, 1993
Cash Activity for the Month of February:
Cash and Investments as of February 1, 1993
Cash Receipts
Cash Disbursements
Cash and Investments as of February 28, 1993
$
$
24,481,115
1,427,293
(1,557,858)
24,350,553
Cash and Investments Portfolio:
Type of Investment
Petty Cash
Interest Checking
Benefit demand deposits
Trust accounts-TCSD bonds
Deferred Comp. Fund
Local Agency Investment Fund
Institution
City Hall
Bank of America
Bank of America
Bank of America
ICMA
State Treasurer
Yield
2.450%
1.400%
4.649%
Balance
800
306,454
10,131
5,235,656
309,431
18,488,081
(1)
(1)
$ 24,350,553
(1)-This amount includes outstanding checks.
Per Government Code Requirements, this Treasurer's Report is in compliance with
the City of Ternecula's Investment Policy and there are adequate funds available
to meet budgeted and actual expenditures for the next thirty days of the City
of Temecula.
Prepared by Camle Serfling, Senior Accountant
ITEM
NO.
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVA
CITY ATTORNEY ~
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning/'~2'
April 13, 1993
City Comments on the request by the Native American Observer Training
Association to transfer the site of the Village of Temeku to the Bureau of Indian
Affairs
PREPARED BY:
David W. Hogan, Associate Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
It is requested that the City Council:
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA
DETERMINING THAT THE TRANSFER OF 17.97 ACRES OF LAND FROM THE
NATIVE AMERICAN OBSERVERS ASSOCIATION TO THE BUREAU OF INDIAN
AFFAIRS TO ENSURE THE PROTECTION OF THE SITE OF THE VILLAGE OF
TEMEKU WILL NOT HAVE AN ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE CITY OF
TEMECULA.
BACKGROUND
In 1992, Mr. Vince Ibanez representing the Native American Observer Training AsSociation
(NAOTA) requested that land owned by the Association become tribal trust land under the
ownership and control of the Bureau of Indian Affairs. The NAOTA property, Assessor's
Parcel No. 922-220-021, is a 17.97 acre parcel located west of Interstate 15 and south of
Temecula Creek. The NAOTA property is shown on the Vicinity Map contained in Attachment
No. 1. According to Mr. Ibanez, he has made this request to protect the site of the former
Luise~o Indian village of Temeku from illegal artifact hunters.
DISCUSSION
The regulations of the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) require that local governments which
could be potentially affected by a trust land transfer must be provided an opportunity to
comment upon the proposed transfer. Bureau's regulations state that local governments
should have an opportunity to address the following issues:
R:~qTAFFRP'I"~AOTA.CC 3/29t93 lifo 1
· The compatibility of the proposed transfer with the draft City General Plan.
· The fiscal impact of the transfer on the City.
The Planning Commission considered the Native American Observer Training Association's
request on February 22, 1993. The draft City General Plan designation for the NAOTA
property is Hillside Residential. The Hillside Residential (RH) designation is intended to provide
for very low density residential and open space uses in areas with slopes greater than 25%,
limited access and public services, fire hazards, and other environmental concerns. The
General Plan also contains several goals and policies which would support the proposed
transfer. Open Space and Conservation Goal 6 states that a goal of the City's General Plan
is to preserve significant historic and cultural resources.
The primary impact of the transfer of this property to the Bureau of Indian Affairs is that it
would be to remove the property from the control of the City of Temecula. Under the current
laws, the City has no jurisdiction over BIA owned lands. However, according to the attorney
representing Mr. Ibanez, there is very little that Mr. Ibanez could do with the property because
of it's historic place designation, the lack of access, and the fact that the land would not be
part of the PeChanga Reservation.
During the Commission meeting, Mr. Ibanez stated that he had no plan to develop the
property beyond the possible re-creation of the original village of Temeku. The transfer of this
site to the Bureau of Indian Affairs would facilitate the preservation of the site. As a result,
the Commission determined that NAOTA's request was consistent with the City's Draft
General Plan and adopted Resolution PC 93-03. A copy of the Planning Commission's
resolution is attached to this Agenda Report as Attachment No. 2.
According to information provided by the County Assessor's Office, removing the subject
parcel from the Property Tax Rolls will not have a significant financial impact upon the City.
The subject property contributed a total of $227.90 in 1991 and $217.16 in 1992 in property
taxes for local and county services. Of these amounts, the City of Temecula received
approximately $14.81 in 1991 and $14.11 in 1992. The property is not located within the
Temecula Community Services District and, as a result, is not being assessed for services.
A copy of a Resolution finding that the transfer will not have a significant adverse impact on
the City is attached to this Agenda Report as Attachment No. 3.
FISCAL IMPACT
The estimated fiscal impact of the transfer of this property to the Bureau of Indian Affairs will
be the loss of approximately $14.00 per year in property taxes to the City.
Attachments:
Resolution - Page 3
Vicinity Map - Page 6
Planning Commission Resolution - Page 7
R:/S~STAFFRPT~AOTA.CC 416193 klb 2
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
RESOLUTION
R:~TAFF]ti~I*~NAOTA.CC 3/29/93 klb ~
ATTACItlV~,,NT NO. 1
RESOLUTION NO.
"A RESOLUTION OF ~ CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF
TEMEC~ DETERMINING THAT THE TRANSFER OF 17.97 ACRES
OF LAND FROM TIff-NATIVE A_A,~-RICAN OBSERVERS ASSOCIATION
TO ~ BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS TO ENSURE ~
PROTECTION OF T!:ff, SITE OF THE VH,I,AGE OF TEN,W, KU WILL
NOT HAVE AN ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE CITY OF TEMEC~A"
WI:ff~REAS, the Native American Observer Training Association acquired the ti~e to
a 17.97 acre parcel of land (Assessor's Parcel Number 922-220-021) from the California
Department of Transportation in 1985; and,
WI-TEREAS, said parcel contains the partially excavated site of the Luisefio Village of
Temeku; and,
WFIF~REAS, the Native American Observer Training Association has requested that the
Bureau of Indian Affairs take title of said parcel to ensure the protection of the site of the village
of Temeku and that said parcel would not become part of the Pechanga Indian Reservation; and,
WI~FEREAS, the regulations of the Bureau of Indian Affairs require that local
governments which could be potentially affected by such a transfer be provided an opportunity
to comment upon the fiscal and land use impacts of a land transfer; and,
WI~-~AS, said 17.97 acre parcel of land is located within the City of Temecula; and,
WI~:REAS, the General Plan for the City of Temecula has been reviewed by the
Planning Commission, and that the Commission has recommended to the City Council that the
Council approve and adopt the drdft General Plan; and,
W!~,REAS, the City Planning Commission considered whether or not the transfer of
said parcel to the Bureau of Indian Affairs would be consistent with the City General Plan at it's
February 22, 1993 meeting; and,
W!:~,REAS, the City Planning Commission determined that the transfer of sid parcel to
ensure the protection of the site of the Village of Temeku would be consist with the City's
General Plan; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council considered the land use consistency and fiscal impact
issues at it's April 13, 1993 meeting; and,
~, the City Council determined that the transfer would not have a significant
impact upon the City's finances and would be consistent with the City's General Plan when it
is adopted;
R:\S~STAFFR.PT~AOTA.CC 3129/93 klb 4
NOW, T!:~-RI?-FORE, ~ CITY COUNCIL FOR ~ CITY OF TEMECULA
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AND DETER_MINE THAT ~ PROPOS~,n TRANSFER OF
~ ABOVEMENTIONEn PROPERTY TO ~ BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS TO
ENSURE ~ PROTECTION OF ~ SITE OF ~ VILLAGE OF TEMEKU WOUIX}
NOT HAVE AN ADVERSE IMPACT ON ~ CITY OF TEMECULA.
Section 1. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution.
PASSED, AlPROVED AND ADOFrEn this 13rd day of April, 1993.
SAL MLr OZ
MAYOR
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALr~ORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TI~MECULA)
I HEnl;',Ry CERT~Y that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City
Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 13rd day of April,
1993 by the following vote of the City Council:
AYES:
NOF.,S:
ABSENT:
CO~M~MBERS:
CO~CII,MRMBERS:
CO~CILMEMBERS:
R:~q~qT~OTA.CC 3/29/93 klb 5
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
VICINITY MAP
R:~STAFFRPT~NAOTA.CC 4/6/93 klb 6
CITY OF TEMECULA
\/
SITE
.) i
CASE NO.: Determination of General Plan Consistency
ATTACHMENT: 1
C.C. DATE: April 13, 1993
VICINITY MAP
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION
~ R:~q~"TAFFRPT~AOTA.CC 416193 Idb 7
PC RESOLUTION NO. 93-03
"A RESOLUTION OF ~ PLANNING COMMt~SION OF ~ CITY OF
TEMECULA DETERMINING THAT ~ TRANSFER OF 17.97 ACRES
OF LAND PROM TIff- NATIVE A1V~.RICAN OBSERVERS ASSOCIATION
TO ~ BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS IS CONSISTENT WITH ~
CITY GENERAL PLAN"
WHEREAS, The Native American Observer Training Association acquired the ti~e to
a 17.97 acro parcel of land (Assessor's Parcel Number 922-220-021) from the California
Department of Transportation in 1985; and,
WHEREAS, The Native American Observer Training Association has requested that the
Bureau of Indian Affairs take ti~e of said parcel as a tribal trust land that is not a part of the
Pechanga Indian Reservation; and,
WFrk'IRE~, the regulations of the Bureau of Indian Affairs require that local
governments which could be potentially affected by such a transfer be provided an opportunity
to comment upon the fiscal and land use impacts of a land transfer; and,
WVIEREAS, said 17.97 acre parcel of land is located within the City of Temecula; and,
~AS, the General Plan for the City of Temecula has been reviewed by the
Planning Commission, and that the Commission has recommended to the City Council that the
Council approve and adopt the draft General Plan; and,
W'HERY`~S, the City Planning Commission has evaluated said transfer request for its
consistency with the most recent draft of the City's General Plan; and,
NOW, T!:I~.RY`FORE, ~ PLANNING COMMISSION FOR ~ CITY OF
TEMECULA DOES fiERY. By RESOLVE AND DETERMINE THAT ~ PROPOSED
TRANSFER OF ~ ABOVEMV-N~ONED PROPERTY IS CONSISTENT WITH ~
INTENT AND PURPOSE OF ~ DRAFt CITY GENERAL PLAN.
R:\S~STAFFRF~GENPLAN.PC 2124/93 5
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 22nd day of February, 993. o f F e~A~~
I I:rRREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 22nd day of
February, 1993 by the following vote of the Commission:
AYES: 5 COMMISSIONERS: BLAIR, CHINIAEFF, FAHEY, FORD,
HOAGLAND
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIO~:
NOES: 0,
ABSENT: 0
Y TftORN/ntJ,
SECRETARY
R:%S%STAFFRPT%GENPLAN.PC 2/24/93 6
ITEM
NO.
6
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
APPROVA~
CITY ATTORNEY .
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
PREPARED BY:
City Council/City Manager
Scott F. Field, City Attorney
and Tim Serlet, City Engineer
April13,1993
Consideration of Take-Over Agreement with Indemnity Insurance
Company of California to Complete the I-15 Widening Project,
PW 91-04
Gregory G. Diaz, Esq., Burke, Williams & Sorensen
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council approve in substantiality the form
presented the Agreement between the City of Temecula and
the Indemnity Insurance Company of California requiring
Indemnity to complete the I-15 widening project for their
Principal, Oliver Brothers and authorizing the Mayor to execute
the Agreement on the City Council's behalf and the City Clerk
to attest thereto.
BACKGROUND:
The City Council awarded to Oliver Brothers Construction Company the contract to be the
general contractor on the I-15/Rancho California road project. Oliver Brothers commenced
work on the project but were unable to financially complete the project. As a result of
this, the City of Temecula was served with several lawsuits from the suppliers of
materials, equipment, and labor involving the project who had not been paid as well was
faced with the difficulty of not having the project completed.
As required by state law, all successful bidders on public works projects must submit both
a labor and materials bond and a faithful performance bond to secure their work. Oliver
Brothers submitted both bonds from Indemnity Insurance Company of California.
Indemnity is legally obligated to perform for its principal upon the principal's default. Since
Oliver Brothers is unwilling and unable to complete the project, Indemn!ty is legally
obligated to complete the project.
Given the fact that there were some anticipated change orders which expanded the scope
of work beyond that covered by Indemnity's bond, the City commenced negotiations with
Indemnity to reach an agreement for a "Take-Over" contract which would ensure the
completion of the project in a timely manner. The attached agreement represents that
effort to have this matter resolved. As a result of the provisions of the Agreement, the
surety will be responsible for finding a contractor to complete the project and ensuring that
all existing litigation against the City is resolved. The contract further provides that any
change orders not within the scope of work as set forth in the Agreement and which are
not covered by Indemnity's bonds, will be the financial obligation of the City.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The approval of this Take-Over Contract is not anticipated to have significant fiscal
impacts. The City will be able to make a claim against the surety for its costs in enforcing
the bonded obligations and defending the litigation prior to the surety's take-over of the
same. Any change orders or amendments to the contract and scope of work will
represent additional fiscal impacts but these will be separately presented for approval to
the City Council.
Attachments:
1. The Take-Over Contract with Indemnity.
TAKE OVER COSTRACT
BETWEEN SURETY AND PERFORMAH~B BOHD OBL'rGEE
Made by and between INDEMNITY COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA ("Sure-
ty") a California corporation ("Surety"), and THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, a California general law municipal corporation, ("Own-
er" ).
RECITALS
WHEREAS, Owner entered into an agreement, (the "Construction
Contract"), with Oliver Brothers, ("Principal"), for the con-
struction of certain improvements pertaining to the widening of
the off-ramps and installation of signals, on certain portions of
the 1-15 Highway, in the City of Temecula, California, as more
specifically set forth in Owner's Contract No. 04039, Owner's
project No. PW91-04 ("Project"); (a copy of the Construction
Contract is attached hereto as Exhibit 'A' and incorporated
herein by reference;) and,
WHEREAS, Surety issued performance bond No. 229562P, (the
"Bond"), to provide for the completion of the Project in the
event of a default by its Principal; (a copy of the Bond is
attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and incorporated herein by refer-
ence;) and,
1030124.AGR --1--
WHEREAS, Owner has declared Principal to be in default of
the Construction Contract and has terminated Principalws rights
to proceed thereunder and demanded that Surety discharge its
obligations to Owner under the Bond~ (a copy of Ownerws Letter of
Default is attached hereto as Exhibit "C" and incorporated herein
by reference;) and,
WHEREAS, Surety is ready, willing, and able to discharge its
obligation to Owner under the Bond~ and,
WHEREAS, Owner is willing to commit itself to be bound by
the terms and conditions of the Construction Contract as modified
herein, with respect to a new contractual relationship with
Surety, and to dedicate the remaining Construction Contract funds
as a source of funding for the completion of the Project~ and,
WHEREAS, Owner is willing to accept the terms of this
Agreement as the method by which Surety shall satisfy its perfor-
mance obligations to Owner under the Bond.
NOW, THEREFORe,-in consideration of the mutual promises,
undertakings, agreements, and covenants herein contained, and for
other good and valuable consideration the receipt and sufficiency
of which are hereby acknowledged, Owner and Surety do hereby
agree as follows:
10~0124.A~ --2--
1. Recitals. The Recitals set forth above are incorporat-
ed herein by reference.
2. Performance of Surety. Surety agrees to take over and
procure the performance of all work and/or other bonded obliga-
tions of the defaulted Principal, under the terms and conditions
of the Construction Contract, not presently completed or ful-
filled, including the correction and repair of any defective
workmanship previously executed by the Principal.
3. Affirmation of the Construction Contract= Dedication of
Remaininu Contract Funds. Owner hereby agrees to affirm the
terms and conditions of the Construction Contract as modified
herein, including all plans and specifications thereof, and to
dedicate the sum of $ (which Owner has advised
Surety is the remaining contract balance) to the completion of
the Project and fulfillment of the Construction Contract as
provided herein. The remaining items to be completed on this
Project are as set forth on Exhibit "D" attached hereto and
incorporated herein by this reference.
4. Payment of Surety by Owner. Owner agrees to pay Surety
for Suretyfs costs of completion, in the same manner and schedule
as set forth in the Construction Contract with respect to the
Principal. Surety will in turn, provide, and be responsible for,
payment to the actual Contractor completing the Project. In the
10~124.~R --3-
event a claim for the remaining contract funds, or any portion
thereof, is made at the Bankruptcy Court in the bankruptcy
proceedings of Principal, Surety shall indemnify, protect,
defend, and hold harmless Owner, in regard to such claims, or any
loss or damages incurred by Owner (City), by reason of such
claim(s).
Prior to any progress payment being made by Owner to Surety
for work performed by Suretyts retained completion contractor,
Surety shall submit to Owner the Contractorts Affidavit and
Partial Release to Owner. Said Affidavit shall be in substan-
tially the same form as Exhibit "E', attached hereto and incorpo-
rated herein by this reference as if set forth in full. Prior to
the final payment to Surety or Surety:s retained completion
contractor, Surety or Surety~s retained completion contractor
shall submit to Owner the Contractor:s Affidavit and' Final
Release, as set forth on Exhibit "F', attached hereto and incor-
porated herein by this reference as if set forth in full.
5. Surety:s Access to Documents. Owner agrees to provide
and/or send to Surety or its designated representative, including
but not limited to representatives of the actual Contractor
retained by Surety to complete the construction requirements
under the Bond, copies of all pertinent documents and other
information as may be reasonably necessary for Surety to deter-
mine its liability to Owner pursuant to the terms of the Bond and
1~0124.~R '4 '
this Agreement, and/or for Surety or its retained Contractor to
execute Surety fs performance obligations under the Bond.
6. Suretvts Access to the Proiect Site. Owner agrees to
afford Surety and/or its authorized representatives, including
but not limited to representatives of the actual Contractor
retained by Surety to complete the construction requirements
under the Bond, complete access to the Project at any reasonable
time, in order for Surety to determine its liability to Owner
pursuant to the terms of the Bond and this Agreement, and/or for
Surety or its retained Contractor to execute Suretyts performance
obligations under the Bond.
7. Affirmation of Bond. Surety acknowledges and reaffirms
that its performance bond 229562P, previously issued by Surety
~for the benefit of Owner, remains in full force and effect.
8. Disposition of Retained Contract Funds. Owner shall
pay to Surety, upon Sureryes completion of the Construction
Contract and acceptance of the Project by Owner, and receipt from
Surety of required Stop Notice Releases or a blanket Stop Notice
Release Bond as provided for in Paragraph 9 below, all remaining
Construction Contract funds retained by Owner .
9. Stop Notices. Surety shall supply Owner with Stop
Notice Releases prior to Owner releasing to Surety those funds
1 ~0124. ~e -- 5 --
frozen by the Stop Notices. Stop Notice Releases shall be
obtained by SUrety from the various stop notice claimants, in
exchange for Surety rendering payment to the stop notice claim-
ants, assuming that the claimantts have validly substantiated
their'claims against the payment bond to the satisfaction of
Surety, and properly protected their rights under the applicable
stop notice statutes. In the alternative, Surety may also opt to
provide Owner with a blanket Stop Notice Release Bond, from a
surety acceptable to Owner, holding Owner harmless and protecting
Owner from any liability resulting from Ownerrs payment to Surety
of the balance of the retained Construction Contract funds. Upon
Owner~s receipt of the Stop Notice Release Bond, Owner will then
pay over to Surety the entire balance of the retained Construc-
tion Contract funds in Owner~s possession, covered by the Stop
Notice Release Bond. Owner agrees to promptly provide to Surety,
copies of all Stop Notices received by Owner against the Project.
Surety further to agrees indemnify, protect, defend, and
hold Owner, Owneris officers, employees, and agents harmless from
any claim, cost, loss, or expense resulting from Owneris release
of funds to Surety held pursuant to such stop notices. If
litigation ensues against Owner from any stop notice claimants or
other parties regarding the failure to receive payment for work
and/for materials supplfed,'Surety agrees to assume Owneris
defense without a reservation of rights.
1030124.AGR --6--
10. L~quidated Damaaes. Neither Surety nor its retained
completion contractor shall be held liable for any liquidated
damages assessed by Owner against Principal.
11. Liability of Surety.
(a) Surety's liability under the Bond and/or this
Agreement, shall not exceed in the aggregate, the penal bond sum
of $526,681.36. Each payment made by Surety to its retained
completion Contractor, pursuant to Sureryes performance obliga-
tions under the Bond, or this Agreement, shall reduce Suretyts
total aggregate liability under the terms of the Bond and this
Agreement, until the penal sum of the Bond is exhausted if
necessary, at which point, Surety~s performance obligations under
the Bond and this Agreement, will be deemed to have been ful-
filled.
(b) Suretyts retained completion contractor shall be
~responsible for completing the Project -- including any change
orders thereto except that Owner shall be responsible for payment
directly to the contractor if the change orders, or any portion
thereof, result in the cost of completing the Project exceeding
the penal sum of the bond. The foregoing requirement is intended
to ensure prompt completion of the Project and compliance with
Public Contract Code Section 20163.
1030124.AGR -7-
(c) Surety will cause the retaining wall necessary to
complete theproject to be bid as a separate item in its bid
package. Owner will provide Surety with sufficient information
and specifications necessary to have the retaining wall bid as a
separate item. If Owner approves the amount of the bid for the
retaining wall prior to commencement of construction of the
retaining wall, Owner will, at Suretyts option:
(i)
Reimburse Surety for costs associated with
the retaining wall; or,
(2)
Pay the completion contractor directly for
costs associated with the retaining wall.
If Owner fails to approve the amount of the bid for the retaining
wall, Surety will not be required to construct such wall. Owner
agrees, at Suretygs option, to accept a separate labor and
materials bond and a separate faithful performance bond for the
retaining wall portion of the work under the contract or to
accept a substitution of contractors under the existing bonds.
Said bonds may be issued by Surety or any other surety authorized
to issue such bonds in California.
12. Notices. All notices and communications required by or
pertaining to this Agreement, or Suretyts performance of its
lO,~0124.AGR -8-
obligations under the Bond, shall be sent to the parties at the
following address:
(1) To Owner at:
The City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California 92590
Attn: Don Spagnolo, P.E.
Principal Engineer, Capital Improvements
Projects.
(2) To Surety at:
Indemnity Company of California
17780 Fitch, Suite 200
Irvine, California 92714
Attn: Gordon Strange
Senior Counsel, Claims
Each of the parties shall be entitled to specify different or
additional addresses by giving written notice to the other party
in the manner set forth herein.
13. Governinu Law. This Agreement shall be governed by the
laws of the State of California.
14. Authority to Execute Document. Each party hereto
expressly warrants that it has the necessary authority to execute
this Agreement on behalf of its governing board, board of direc-
tors, City Council, etc., and that each signatory hereto has
authority to execute th.is Agreement on behalf of its respective
named party.
1030124. AGR -- 9 -
15. B~nding Effect. This Agreement shall be binding upon
and inure to the benefit of the successors and assigns of the
parties hereto.
16. Entire AGreement. This Agreement supersedes all prior
agreements written or oral between the parties hereto, and shall
constitute the only operative agreement between said parties with
respect to the subject matter set forth herein. There are no
other understandings or agreements between the parties hereto
with respect to the subject matter set forth herein.
17. Non-Waiver. No delay or failure by any party hereto to
exercise any right under this Agreement, nor partial or single
exercise of that right, shall constitute a waiver of that or any
other right, unless otherwise expressly provided herein.
18. Headings. Headings in this Agreement are for conve-
nience only and shall not be used to interpret or construe the
provisions contained'herein.
19. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in two
counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, all of
which taken together, shall constitute one and the same instru-
ment. No counterpart shall be deemed an original unless in the
possession of the other party hereto.
IO'~O124"4X3R -10-
20. Attorneys Fees and Court Costs. In the event of any
conflict between the parties hereto, with regard to the enforce-
ment and/or interpretation of the provisions contained herein,
the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attorney
fees and costs.
WHEREFORE, the parties hereto have entered into this Take
Over Agreement on the date and year first written above.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement
on the last date appearing below.
SURETY
Indemnity Company of California
BY:
NAME: Susan M. Moore
TITLE: Vice President, Claims
DATE:
OWNER
The City of Temecula
J. Sal Munoz, Mayor
ATTEST:
(Seal)
June S. Greek, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Scott F. Field, City Attorney
1030124.AGR --11--
A
B
C
D
E
F
EXHIBIT8
Construction Contract
Performance Bond No. 229562P
Letter of Default
Scope of Remaining Work
Contractor's Affidavit and Partial Release
Contractor's Affidavit and Final Release
1030124.AGR --12 --
ITEM
NO.
7
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
City Manager/City Council
FROM:
Mary Jane McLarney, Finance Officer
DATE:
April 13, 1993
SUBJECT:
Park View Property Acquisition Financing Terms
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the revised financing terms
for the acquisition of the Park View property.
DISCUSSION: The original purchase agreement for the acquisition of the
Park View property as approved by the City Council on October 6, 1992 provided for
the seller to take back a note in the amount of $1,155,000 at prime interest plus 1%,
amortized over 20 years and due in five years. However, based on current market
conditions (prime at 6%) it is more cost effective for the City to acquire the property
for cash using Development Impact Fees.
ITEM
NO.
8
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNli~
FINANCE OFFICE
CITY MANAGE
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
/~'~Tim Do Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
April 13, 1993
Traffic Signals - Four-Way STOP at Avenida Barca and Margarita Road
PREPARED BY.' James "Ben" Dobbins, Traffic Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
The Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommends that the City Council include the
construction of a traffic signal at the intersection of Avenida Barca and Margarita Road in the
FY93-94 Capital Improvement Program, and as an interim measure, adopt a resolution
entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ESTABLISHING "STOP" SIGNS.
BACKGROUND:
At its March 25, 1993 meeting, the Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommended that the
City Council include the installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Avenida Barca and
Margarita Road in the FY93-94 Capital Improvement Program, and as an interim measure,
recommended the installation of a four-way STOP.
The existing intersection is now controlled with STOP signs facing traffic on Avenida Barca
at Margarita Road. The intersection is a school crossing with crosswalks on the northerly,
easterly and southerly legs. A crossing guard is now posted at the intersection during school
crossing times. Vehicle and pedestrian counts were made on March 2, 1993 from 6:30 to
8:30 a.m. and from 1:30 to 3:00 p.m. These counts determined that a traffic signal was
warranted under the guidelines as established by the State of California.
A school child pedestrian was recently struck by a vehicle within the crosswalk while crossing
Margarita Road. The crossing guard was supervising the crossing at the time of the accident.
PwOl\agdrpt\93\O413\avebarea.res 0402e
FISCAL IMPACT:
In FY92-93, install two STOP signs, two STOP AHEAD signs, with STOP bars and STOP
AHEAD legends (four (4) signs and legends at $125.00/each -- $500.00)° Funds are
available in Account No. 100-164-999-5244 (Signs).
Attachments:
1. Resolution No. 93-
2. Public/Traffic Commission Report
pw01 ~agdrpt~93\0413\avebarQa.res 0402a
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISIHNG "STOP" SIGNS.
The City Council of the City of Temecula does resolve, determine and order as follows:
Section 1. Pursuant to Section 12.08.301 of the Municipal Code, the following
"STOP" sign locations are hereby established in the City of Temecula.
A.
B.
Section 2.
PASSED, APPROVi~X} AND ADOPT!,I}, by the City Council of the City of Temecula
at a regular meeting held on the day of ,1993.
Eastbound Margarita Road @ AveRida Barca;
Westbound Margarita Road @ AveRida Barca;
The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution.
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
J. Sal Mu~oz, Mayor
p:%ctycncil%avebarca.res pw01 \agdrpfi93~,0413%avebarca.res 0402e
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )
CITY OF TEMECULA )
SS
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that
Resolution No. 93-02 was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular
meeting thereof held on the 12th day of January, 1993, by the following roll call vote:
COUNCILMI~-MBERS:
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
AJ~STAIN:
COUNTERS:
Iune S. Greek, City Clerk
P:%ctYcncil\avebarca.ree pwO 1%egdrpt%93~0413%avebarca.ree 0402a
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
AGENDA REPORT
Public/Traffic Safety Commission
Ben Dobbins, Traffic Engineer
Match 25, 1993
Item 2
Traffic Signals - Avenida Barca and Margarita Road
RECOMMENDATION:
That the commission recommend to City Council the installation of Traffic Signals at the
intersection of Avertida Barca' and Margarita Road, it is also recommended that the
Commission recommend on the installation ·of a four way stop as a interim measure.
BACKGROUND:
The existing intersection is now controlled with stop signs facing traffic on Avenida Barca.
The intersection is a school crossing with crosswalks on the northerly easterly and southerly
legs. A crossing guard now is posted at the intersection during school crossing time, Vehicle
turning movement and pedestrian counts were made from 6:30 to 8:30 am and from 1:30
pm to 3:00 pro. These counts found that a traffic signal was warranted for a school area
traffic signal as established by the State of California.
TRAFFIC DATA:
Peak AM-PM Volumes
Margarita Traffic Volume
Pedestrians Crossing
Attached signal warrant sheet.
6:45 am to 7:45 am 1:45 om to 2:45 om
653 541
77 93
PwOl%treffic%commissn%egenda~93%0325 0315
9-10
TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING
Figure'9-5
SCHOOL PROTECTION WARRANTS
Traffic Manual
CALC
CHK
DATE
DATE
Critical Approach Speed
Critical Approach Speed
Critical soeed of major street tratlic _> 40 mph ............ .' _ [] }
or
In built up area of isolated communi'ty of < 10,000 pop. []
~/,=/e~ --
z/5' mph
Z 5 mph
'RURAL (R)
[], URBAN (U)
FLASHING YELLOW SCHOOL SIGNALS
(ALL PARTS MUST BE SATISFIED)
SATISFIED
YES
~:~ NO
PART A
Vehicle Volume j Earn
AND
PAhT B
Critical Approach Speed Exceeds 35 mph
AND
PART C
Is nearest controlled crossing more than 600:feet away? .
SATISFIED
SATISFIED
SATISFIED
YES
YES
YES
NO r"].
NO []
NO []
SCHOOL AREA TRAFFIC SIGNALS
(ALL PARTS MUST BE SATISFIED)
II
PART A ' !1 u I(,~
Venicie Volume Each ot
2f~ou,s J 500 G~'~ 5''i I
Earnot 100 {~) 77
School Age Pedestrians 2 r~urs
Crossing Street or
per by 500 350
AND.
PART B
Is nearest controlled crossing more than 600 feet away?
SATISFIED
SATISFIED
SATISFIED
YES.
YES []
YES []
NO
NO []
NO []
COLLISION DIAGRAM
NUMSER OF
PROP~.'~T'Y DAMAGE ONLY .- ·
<:.>>>
!NJURY OR FATAL
TOTAL ACC:DENTS .,,,fp _ _ _
FTSRS:
t tr= 5~.av,/c,,, "t . ' '
$YMIGL$
MOVING
S*I.t"~ING VEHICLE
NON-INVOLVED VEHICLE
PEDESTRIAN
PARKED VEHIC/,E
RX~D O~ECT
FATAL ~CC~ENT
INJURY
TYPe, S OF C:LLISTONS
SHOW FOR ~,A, AC:;~ENT
I. TIMe. 3AY.
2. WEAT~F..:t AN~ ;,CAD
SU~.;AC~ - ;F UNUSUAL
C~-,NOITICI~
3. NIT~ - ;F -'~'TWE_-'N CUSK
ANO OA~',fN
:wC~*.::,,ific~::ms.-~.t :;,~ :;I
ITEM
NO.
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY('~-~
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM: /1~
DATE:
City Council/City Manager
Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
April 13, 1993
SUBJECT:
Release Material and Labor Bonds in Tract No. 21764
PREPARED BY: '3~lbert Crisp, Permit Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council AUTHORIZE the release of Material and Labor Bonds for Sewer System
Improvements in Tract No. 21764, and DIRECT the City Clerk to so advise the Clerk of the
Board of Supervisors.
BACKGROUND:
On December 6, 1988, the Riverside County Board of Supervisors entered into subdivision
agreements with:
Warmington Homes
119 N. Maple Street, Suite M
Corona, CA 91720
for the installation of sewer system, and subdivision monumentation. Accompanying the
subdivision agreements were surety bonds issued by:
Developers Insurance Company
as follows:
Bond No. 960239S in the amount of $51,000.00 to cover sewer improvements.
Bond No. 960239S in the amount of $25,500.00 to cover material and labor.
Bond No. 960240S in the amount of $8,100.00 to cover subdivision monumentation.
-1 - pwO1 ~agdrpt~93%0413~21764 0401 b
On August 11, 1992, the City Council accepted the Sewer System Improvements and the
Subdivision Monumentation, and accepted the Faithful Performance Warranty Rider and a
subdivision agreement rider thereby initiating the one-year warranty period.
The developer is also required to post Material and Labor Bonds to ensure payment to
suppliers and workers. These bonds are maintained in effect for a period of time determined
by statute after the governmental agency has accepted the public improvements. The
Riverside County Clerk of the Board of Supervisors and the City Clerk's office indicate that
no liens have been filed against this project and a period in excess of the statutory lien period
having run, Staff recommends that these Material and Labor Bonds be released.
The Faithful Performance Warranty Bond will be maintained in place until the one-year
warranty period has run, repairs/replacement of deficient improvements are made if required,
Staff recommends release of this bond, and City Council authorizes such release.
Street and Water system improvements are secured as a portion of faithful and performance
and material and labor bond amounts for Tract No. 20881. Those several bonds will be
reduced/released when all required improvements in Tract No. 20881 are completed and
accepted by City Council.
The affected streets are a portion of Del Rey Road and Calle Pifia Colada.
Attachment:
1. Vicinity Map
'-2- PwO1~agdrpt~.93~0413~,21764 O401b
To Corona
To R,versl~:lee
norm
scale
To San Diego
/"/Y'c~77"/~'77r---..4/-. TOi, t//v'5/-//.~ 7S, g-AA.I~E 2.1f/,
1 ': 4000'
V/C/N/T Y MAP
ITEM NO. 1-0
APPROVAL .~
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
City Council/City Manager
/~.~Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
April 13, 1993
SUBJECT:
Accept Public Improvements in Tract No. 23160
PREPARED BY: ~Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer
RECOMMENDAT}'O~NN:
That the City Council ACCEPT the Public Improvements in Tract No. 23160, AUTHORIZE the
reduction of Faithful Performance Street, and Sewer and Water System Securities, ACCEPT
the Subdivision Warranty Bond, APPROVE the subdivision agreement rider,and DIRECT the
City Clerk to so advise the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors.
BACKGROUND:
On March 6, 1990, the City Council approved Final Tract Map No. 23160. Agreements and
Faithful Performance and Material Labor Bonds were filed by:
Nicholas E. Tavaglione
3545 Central Ave., Ste. 200
Riverside, CA 92506
for the installation of street improvements, sewer and water systems, and subdivision
monumentation. Accompanying the subdivision agreements were surety bonds issued by:
Amwest Surety Insurance Company
Bond No. 1203078 in the amount of $105,000.00 to cover street improvements.
Bond No. 1203079 in the amount of $103,500.00 to cover water system
improvements.
Bonds No. 1203078 and 1203079, in the amounts of $52,500 and $51,500,
respectively, to cover material and labor amounts for street and water system
improvements.
-1 - pw01 \agdrpt\93~0413~23160 0405a
Bond No. 1203080 in the amount of $1,000 to cover material and labor amount for
sewer system improvements.
The sewer system Faithful Performance security is a $2,000.00 cash deposit. The
Subdivision Monumentation is secured by a $1,100.00 cash deposit.
The following items have been completed by the developer in accordance with the
approved plans:
Required street, sewer, and water improvements within Tract No. 23160.
The affected street is a portion of Margarita Road.
The inspection and verification process relating to the above items has been completed by the
Riverside County Transportation Department and City Staff, and the Public Works Department
recommends the acceptance of the work and the initiation of the one-year warranty period.
Therefore, it is appropriate to reduce these security amounts as follows:
Streets: $94,500
Water System: 93,150
Sewer System: 1,800
The remaining 10% of the original Faithful Performance security amounts are to be retained
for one (1) year guarantee/warranty period:
Streets: $10,500
Water System: 10,350
Sewer System: 200
Total: $21,050
The developer has submitted Subdivision Warranty Bond issued by Amwest Surety Insurance
Agency designating the City of Temecula as obligee. City Council acceptance of this bond
will permit the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance bonds for these items of work
and to notify the County of Riverside to release the cash deposit security for the Sewer
System as the warranty bond includes the 10% sewer system warranty amount.
The Monumentation security will remain in place until the Survey Monumentation is
completed. The Material and Labor Bonds will remain in place until the statutory period filing
liens for material and labor claims has run. City Council authorizes release of these
bonds/securities as well.
Attachments:
1. Vicinity Map
2. Warranty Bond
3. Subdivision Agreement
-2- pwO1\agdrpt~93\0413\23160 0405a
NO
TP,,A C T 2 ~ I ~ 0 '
vICINITY
ITEM NO.
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVA
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning
April 13, 1993
Amendments to the Ordinance Regulating Temporary Signs
PREPARED BY:
David W. Hogan, Associate Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
It is requested that the City Council uphold the Planning
Commission's recommendation and deny the amendments to the
Ordinance Regulating Temporary Signs, Ordinance 92-16.
BACKGROUND
The City Council approved Ordinance No. 92-16 regulating temporary signs on October 27,
1992. Upon approving the Ordinance the Council instructed Staff to do the following:
Amend the Ordinance to provide a six month moratorium on the enforcement of the
temporary sign regulations, except for temporary signs located in the public right-of-
way and on vehicles;
Initiate a program to remove all temporary signs from the public right-of-way and on
vehicles;
Add new members to the Temporary Sign Committee and have the Committee
reconsider the allowable time periods for temporary signs and the standards for
detached temporary signs;
e
Make a recommendation on needed Ordinance amendments and present them to the
Planning Commission for their consideration; and,
5. Return any recommended ordinance amendments to the City Council.
Items I and 2 have already been accomplished; Items 3, 4 and 5 are addressed in this report.
This Agenda Report forwards the Planning Commission's recommendation to deny the
proposed amendments to the Ordinance Regulating Temporary Signs which were provided by
the Temporary Sign Committee. A strike-out (deleted text) and red-line (inserted text) version
of the temporary sign regulations is included in Attachment No. 1. The Ordinance amending
Ordinance 92-16 is included in Attachment No. 2.
R:~S~TAFFRP~ION.3AR 3/29/93 ILIb 1
DISCUSSION
On March 1, 1993, the Planning Commission considered the proposed amendments to the
Ordinance Regulating Temporary Signs. The proposed ordinance amendments were developed
by the ad-hoc Temporary Sign Committee at it's February 13, 1993, meeting·
It was a consensus of the members present at the meeting that the current Ordinance
Regulating Temporary Signs was still too restrictive. It was the Committee's opinion that, in
addition to allowing promotional signs for even longer periods of time, that detached
temporary promotional signs were also needed to keep struggling local businesses in
operation. As a result, the Temporary Sign Committee recommended the following:
d] ·
That temporary promotional signs should be allowed up to 75% of the year on
a 45-day on and 15-day off pattern.
That the moratorium on the enforcement of the temporary sign regulations
should be extended for an additional 6 months.
That detached temporary signs, up to a total of 32 square feet in size, should
also be allowed as long as the detached signs don't block the visibility of other
businesses or their signs, block vehicular or pedestrian access, or obstruct the
view of motorists.
The Committee's recommendation was presented to the Planning Commission at their
consideration· During the public hearing portion of the Commission's meeting, there was no
public testimony from either the general public or the members of the Temporary Sign
Committee· After a discussion of the issues, the Planning Commission decided to recommend
that the City Council deny the proposed amendments to the ordinance because the proposed
amendments do not address the underlying reasons why many businesses in Temecula are
struggling to stay in business·
In addition, the Commission stated that the proposed amendments would significantly
contribute to additional visual blight and clutter in commercial districts without improving the
overall business climate. A copy of the Planning Commission Staff Report and Minutes are
included in Attachment No. 3 and a copy of the Planning Commission's Resolutions is
included in Attachment No. 4.
FISCAL IMPACT
No fiscal impacts are expected to occur if the Council upholds the Planning Commission's
recommendations. Some additional costs are expected to occur if the ordinance amendments
are approved.
Attachments
2.
3.
4.
Combined Redline/Strike-out Draft of the Temporary Sign Regulations - Page 3
Ordinance - Page 18
March 1, 1993 Planning Commission Staff Report and Minutes - Page 26
Planning Commission Resolution - Page 27
R:~S~STAFFRPT~GN.3AR 416/93 klb 2
ATTACHMENT NO. I
COMBINED REDLINE/STRIKE-OUT DRAFT OF
THE TEMPORARY SIGN REGULATIONS
CONTAINED ORDINANCES NO. 92-16 AND 93---
~ R:~q'I'A/rI;ItH~I'EMP~ION.3AR 3/29/93 Hb 3 '
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
Text which is proposed to be added to the Ordinance is shown with ~~.
which is proposed to be deleted from the Ordinance is shown in a strike out style.
Text
ORDINANCE NO. 93-__
AN ORDINANCE OF ~ CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF
A r mING POR XONS OF ORDINANCE NO. US
PERTAINING TO THE REGULATION OF TEMPORARY SIGNS.
The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby ordain as follows:
Section 1. Findings. The City Council of the City of Tcmecula hereby makes the
following findings:
A. That the City Council is authorized by Section 65850C0) of State Planning and
Zoning Law, to adopt ordinances regulating signs and billboards;
B. That there is a need to improve the competitiveness of service and commercial
businesses and maintain the aesthetic quality of all areas in the City;
C. That them is a need to provide specific and historically appropriate temporary
signage in the Old Town area;
D. That regulating temporary signage is an effective method to improve the aesthetic
quality of all are~ in the City;
E. That the overuse of temporary signs results in visual clutter, the deterioration of
the City's commercial and service districts, and the inefficient use of business advertising
resoilrc, es.
F. That the City is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of the general
plan and that:
1. There is a reasonable probability that this Ordinance will be consistent with
the general plan proposal now being considered and studied.
2. There is fitfie or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference
with the future general plan if this Ordinance is ultimately inconsistent with the plan.
3. Them is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference
with the future Old Town Specific Plan if this Ordinance is ultimately inconsistent with the plan.
R:XSXSTAFFRF~TEMP~IGN.3AR 3/29/93 lab 4
4. That this Ordinance complies with all the applicable requirements of State
hw and local ordinances.
G. That pursuant to City Ordinance 90-04, the City Council adopted by reference
Riverside County Ordinance No. 348, which the Council has subsequen~y amended through
various City Ordinances~
H. The City Coun~ a~. 'City Otdi~eee 92-16, mending Ordinance No. 348,
on October 27, 1992; and,
I. Tim.there is a need to mend Ordinance 92-16 to improve the competitivehess
of service and rxmmmewhl. busiuemes in the' City.
Section 2.
read as follows:
Section 19.2 of Article XIX of Ordinance No. 348 is hereby amended to
"t. "Temporary Sign" means a sign which is made of cloth, bunting,
plastic, vinyl, poster board, painted windows, or other sin~lar materials, and which is located
on site of the business use or activity, and is erected or phced for a prescribed period of time
to pwmote, advertise, announce, or pwvide the following information:
( 1 ) Designates, identifies, or indicates the name of the business,
owner, or occupant of the premises where the sign is located; or,
(2) Advertises the business conducted, the services available or
rendered, or goods produced, sold, or available for sale upon the premises where the sign is
located.
For the purpose of this Ordinance, temporary signs do not include For Sale, Lease or For Rent
Signs (which are reguhted by Section 19.5), Temporary Political Signs (which are regnhted by
Section 19.7), or seasonal window disphys than contain traditional holiday characten and
messages and which are intended to create or enhance holiday character of an area and do not
reference or display service available or rendered, or goods produced, sold or available for sale.
u. "Promotional Sign" means a temporary sign intended to attract
attention to a use or activity for a limited number of events as identified in this ordinance.
v. "Window Sign" means any written representation, emblem or other
character, or sign which is painted, attached, glued, or affixed to a window or is otherwise
easily visible from the exterior of the building where the advertised product or service is
av3ilnble.
w. "Interim Sign" means a temporary sign intended to provide interim
signage while the permanent signage is being fabricated, repaired, or prepared for installation.
R:~-q~TAFFRFr~TF_MI~ION.3AR 3/29/93 lab 5
x. "Special Event Sign" means a temporary sign for special community
activities or seasonal events. By way of example only, such activities or events may include
charitable and community fund raising events, Christmas tree sales, the tractor races, or the
annual Temecula wine and balloon festival.
y. "Grand Opening Sign" means a temporary sign, bearing the words
"Grand Opening", or some sirelint message to announce the opening of a new business.
z. "Temporary Sign Event" means any number of consecutive days,
up to fifteen (15) folly five (~$5), for the display of any promotional sign.
aa. "Portable Sign" means a sign not designed to be attached to a
building or pc.-mnanont structure, vehicle or trailer. Examples of portable signs include, but are
not limited to: A-Frames, also known as sandwich boards, and T-Frames, also known as spring-
loaded signs.
bb. "Vehicle Mounted Sign" means any temporary sign attached or
mounted on any vehicle or trailer, whether or not the tires and wheels are still attached, and
whether or not any such vehicle has an engine or other internal combustion machine contained
within it.
cc. "Historic Old Town Temecuh" means the area within the City of
Temecuh that is bounded by: Metcedes Street on the east, 1st Street on the south, the channel
of Murrieta Creek on the west, and the intenection of Moreno Road and Mercedes Street on the
north.
mourned, placed,
conducted.
dd. '*Aluiched temnlx~rary sign' means a temporary sign which is
or att,,ckd only to .ihe pemmanmt building where le 'business activity is
pipe, or mmy combination of the above. Detsched temporary signs do not include portable or
vehicle mounted signs.
if, . "A-Frame" megus a pmlable advetljsi~ devic~ which is commonly
in the shape of an 'A", or some vafhtion thered, is locat~ on the ~otma, .i~ easily moveable,
and is usually two-sided."
Section 3.
as follows:
Section 19.9 is added to Article XIX of Ordinance No. 348 and shall read
"Section 19.9. TElVlPO~Y SIGNS. No person shall erect, place, or install any
temporary sign that is in violation of the provisions of this Article.
R:%S%STAFFRFF~TBMPSION.3AR 3/29/93 klb 6
A. Permit Required. A Temporary Sign Permit shall be required prior to the placing,
erecting, or installing of any promotional, special event, grand opening, or interim sign. All
such temporary signs shall comply with the provisions of this ordinance and all other applicable
laws and ordinances. An application for a permit shall be made on the forms and in the manner
specified by the Director of Planning and shall be accompanied by the required fees or removal
bond set by resolution of the City Council. The following procedure shall govern the application
for, and issuance of, all temporary sign perufiE under this Article:
1. Within ten (10) working days of receipt of a completed application for a
Temporary Sign Permit, the Director of Planning shall either:
a. Issue the TempoPay Sign Permit, if the sign(s) that is the subject
of the application conforms in every respect with the requirements of this Article; or
b. Deny the Temporary Sign Permit if the sign(s) that is subject of the
application fails in any way to conform with the requirements of this Article. The Director of
Planning shall specify in any denial the section or sections of the Article with which the sign(s)
is inconsistent.
2. In addition to the temporary sign standards listed in this section, the
DirecWr of Planning may attach to any Temporary Sign Permit conditions of approval deemed
necessary to ensure the compatibility with the surrounding area and to protect the public health,
safety, or welfare.
B. Prohibitions. All Temporary Signs not expressly permitted by this Ordinance are
prohibited, including but not limited to the following:
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
Portable signs, including, but not limited to animals, human beings,
A-Frames, T-Frames, and those of a shnilar nature located in the public
right-of-way or on public property.
Portable signs, including, but not Hmited to animals, human beings,
A-Frames, T-Frames, and those of a similnr nature located on private
property.
Vehicle mounted signs.
Pennants and streamers.
Promotional signs, except as permitted by this Section.
Interim signs, except as permitted by this Section.
Special event signs, except as permitted by this Section.
Grand opening signs, except as permitted by this Section.
Window signs occupying more than teu percent (10%) of the nou-door
window area, except as permitted by this Sectiou.
l~shing or rotating temporary signs.
Off-site temporary signs.
Temporary roof signs.
Temporary signs on public property or in the public right-of-way, except
as permitted under Section 19.9.E of this Ordinance.
R:%S~TAFFRF~TIMI~GN.3AR 3/29/93
14.
Temporary signs in Historic Old Town Temecula, except as permitted
under Section 19.10 of this Ordinance.
C. Promotional Signs. Promotional signs are permitted in the C-I, C-P, C-P-S,
C-T, and M-SC zones and shall comply with the appropriate requirements listed below:
1. F~r each use or business activity; only one (1) promotional sign may be
allowed, except that for n use or business activity wit~ f~ntagc on two or more nrtorinl streots,
up to two (2) promotional signs may be aHo~,xl. Window signs occupying more than ton
poreont (10S), and not bx.ator than twonty five petoont (25 %) of the non door window area
shall be considonxl oquivalont to onc (1) p~motioanl sign for pu~-~oses of this Sockion.
1. In any on~ (1) Tempom~ Sign bent, auaehed, detached and window
signago may b~.useti'k ~tny..~m~bi~-~on gtmett~.'th~ following conditions are met:
b. That the total sign face area for all de, tat:h~l promotional signs does
not exceed thirty two (32) square feet.
2. All promodonal signs shall be located attached to tho building whore the
usc or ncti~:y i:; on the aite whero th= uso or activity is located. Th= ,~tndards for thc various
types of promotional signs are M follows: and shall oomply Mth thc following roquiPofilonts:
Attached ~ronmti~ signs' shall .comply w~ ~h~ following
]~ The maximum height of the top of any ~ promotional
sign shah not exceed the top of the eave line or parapet wall of the building where the use or
activity is located.
b:. ~ The dimensions shall not exceed any the following:
The surface area shall not exceed fifty (50) square
(3) feet.
The height (vertical dimension) shah not exceed three
(-3) ~ The width (horizontal dimension) shah not exceed
sixty percent (60%) of the business or store frontage, whichever is smaller.
R:~TAFFRFI~T'~MI~ION.3AR 3/29/93
(I.) The maximum height of the top of~ny detached promotions]
sign shall not exceed fzx (6) feet above the glzamd.
(2) Tim rex.--face area Ihail not exceed thifiT two (32) square feet.
(3) Detached promotional signs shah be mounted to a frame.
Th~ frame shall be eongmet~ of art,satire permanent ma~-rials and shah be constmew. d so that
not additional supggnts or bracing is required.
(a) The pub~c's view of another business or activity;
Tbe puMic's view. efthcsiZnaZe for another business
The view or visibility of the opcntor of any motor
(d) The mm'ement of any pedestrian or motor vehicle.
8: c. Promotional signs that are located on window surfaces shall not
exceed twenty five percent (25 % ) of the non-door window area, except that no penit shall be
required for promotional window signs that cover ten percent (10%) or less of the non-door
window surface area.
3. The maximum consecutive duration for promotional signs is one temporazy
sign event. Temlxn-a~ ~ events my net be eombined'm create longer consentrive time
periods for temporary aigns. 'Between each temporary ~gn event a period of at least ! 5 days
must elapse before any promotional signs can be crecuxl, placed or ingaHed., shnll not cxcxxxJ
any of thc foHow4ng pB~sc~bod timc pc~"iods:
cowsccutivc days); or,
Up to two (2) consecutive Temporary Sign Events, (ic. thirty (30)
b. A total of four (4) Tomporary Sign Events per oalondar yoar.
D. Grand Opening. Interim and Special Evcnt Signs. Grand opening, interim, and
special event signs are permitted in the C-l, C-P, C-P-S, C-T, and M-SC zones and shall
comply with the appropriate requirements listed below:
1. For each use or business activity; up to one (1) sign may be allowed.
Except for a use or business activity with frontage on two or more arterial streets, then up to
two (2) signs may be allowed.
R:~'tSTAFFRF~TBMPSION.3AR 3/29/93 Hb 9
2. Grand opening signs may be penniUed once in the first ninety (90) days
of business operation.
3. Interim signs are for interim and emergency purposes and shall contain
only the business name and logo. Iramira signs must be attached to the building.
4. Special event signs for slx~ial events shall be located close to the activity
or event being advertised.
5. Signs for communitywide events and activities, such as the Tractor Races
or the Temecula Wine and Balloon Festival, are allowed only on the site of the proposed event
and are issued only to the organization or individuals orgnnizing or promoting the event.
6. All Grand opening, interim and special event signs shall be located
attached to thc building whorc thc wsc or activity is on the site where the us~ or activity is
located. The standards for these typ~ of signs are as follows: and 3hnll comply with the
foilow4ng roquito, nents:
a. Attached grand opening, interim and special event signs shall
comply with the foUowing requizemenm:
~ The maximum height of the top of any sign shall not exceed
the top of the eave line or parapet wall of the building where the use or a~vity is located.
b:. ~ The dimensions of any sign shall not exceed any the
following requirements:
feet.
The surface area shall not exceed thirty (30) square
(3) feet.
The height (vertical dimension) shall not exceed three
~ ~ The width (horizontal dimension) shall not exceed
fifty percent (50 % ) of the business or store frontage, whichever is smaller.
b. Detached grand olzning and special event signs shall comply with
the following requirements:
(1): · .The ,m.in~m. hei~t~ of the ~ of shy ~ ~rssl
opening and sp~inl event signs slmll not ~u:eed six (6) fe~t.
(2) The dimensions of any de, tac~ Srssl. opening and sp~ial
even~ signs slmll not e. xcs~i any ~ following r~luiroments:
The surfnc~ am shall mx exceed tirty (30) square
R:~STAFFRPT~TIB/IPSlON.3AR 3/29/93 k]b
(b) Thcizight(verticaldimension)stmllnotsxceedthree
The width Omr'~.6.dal dimension) shall not exceed
(4) .. No 4es,-.~cd grand OpailnE aninl spsCjal event signs.my be
permitted, placed, easeted or ir~sr6tl, Nf..:lf:tlm dinebed grand'opening and'special event sips
blocins, x~.stricts, or impnits any Of the following:
(a) TIme pubfic's view of another business or activity;
Thepublic's view of the signage for anotherbusiness
The view or visibility of the operator of any motor
(d) The movement of any pedestrian or motor vehicle.
c. Grand opening, interim and specinl event signs may be allowed for
any period up to forty-five (45) days. The Director of Planning may allow one time extension,
for any period 'up to thirty (30) days, with good cause. It is the responsibility for the proponent
of the extension to justify why the extension is appropriate.
E. Hardship Provision. The Director of Planning may approve a Hardship Situation
Temporary Sign Permit in cases of extreme hardship and unusual circumstances relating to the
property where the business is located, including off-site construction activities that may disrupt
the public's access to the business. Hardship Situation Temporary Signs shall be granted only
when, because of special circumstances applicable to the property, the strict application of the
Temporary Sign Ordinance deprives the propex~ of privileges enjoyed by other property in the
vicinity and under the identical zoning classification.
1. The proponent of a request for a hardship situation temporary sign shall
be responsible for clearly demonstrating that an extreme hardship and unusual circumstance
exists, and that the extreme hardship and unusual circumstances warrants the approval of a
hardship situation temporary sign, and that strict implementation of the Temporary Sign
Ordinance deprives the property of privileges enjoyed by other property in the vicinity and under
the identical zoning classification.
z:~swr~,ap'nvnn~oN.3^a 3/29m kn, 11
2. The Director of Planning may issue a Temporary Sign Permit for a
hardship situation for any period up to six (6) months. Determination of the number, size, and
location of temporary signs for hardship situations shall be at the discretion of the Director of
Planning.
3. Any hardship temporary sign permit issued shall be conditioned to ensure
that said permit does not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations
upon other properties in the vicinity and in the same zone, to ensure compatibility with the
surrounding area and to protect the public health, safety or weftare."
Section 4.
as follows:
Section 19.10 is added to Article XIX of Ordinance No. 348 and shall read
"Section 19.10. TEMPORARY SIGNS IN HISTORIC OLr} TOWN TEMECULA.
No person shah erect, place or install any temporary sign in Historic Old Town Temecula in
violation of the provisions of this Article.
A. Permit Required. A Temporary Sign Permit shah be required prior to the placing,
erecting, or installing of any promotional, special event, grand opening, or interim sign. AH
such temporary signs shah comply with the provisions of this ordinance and all other applicable
laws and ordinances. An application for a permit shah be made on the forms and in the manner
specified by the Director of Planning and shall be accompanied by the required fees or removal
bond set by resolution of the City Council. The following procedure shall govern the application
for, and issuance of, all temporary sign permits under this Article:
1. Within ten (10) working days of receipt of a completed application for a
Temporary Sign Permit, the Director of Planning shall either:
a. Issue the Temporary Sign Permit, if the sign(s) that is the subject
of the application conforms in every respect with the requirements of this Article; or
b. Deny the Temporary Sign Permit ff the sign(s) that is subject of the
application fails in any way to conform with the requirements of this Article. The Director of
Planning shah specify in any denial the section or sections of the Article with which the sign(s)
is inconsistent.
2. In addition to the temporary sign standards listed in this section, the
Director of Planning may attach to any Temporary Sign Permit conditions of approval deemed
necessary to ensure the compatibility with the surrounding area and to protect the pubtic health,
safety, or welfare.
B. Old Town Local Review Board. The Director of Planning is hereby authorized
to consult with the Old Town Local Review Board to prepare any supplemental requirements
regulating the size, shape, materials, color, or character of temporary signs in Historic Old
Town Temecula that the Director deems necessary to maintain the character of Old Town.
R:~qXSTAFFRF~(IN.3AR 3/29/93 lifo
C. Prohibitions. All Temporary signs not expressly permitted by this Ordinance are
prohibited, including but not limited to the following:
m
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
Portable signs, including, but not limited to animals, human beings,
A-Frames, T-Frames, and those of a s'unilar nature located in the public
right-of-way or on public property.
Portable signs, including, but not limited to animals, human beings,
A-Frames, T-Frames, and those of a similar nature located on private
property.
Vehicle mounted signs.
Pennants and streamers.
Promotional signs, except as permitted by this Section.
Interim signs, except as permitted by this Section.
Special event signs, except as permitted by this Section.
Grand opening signs, except as permitted by this Section.
Window signs occupying more than ten percent (10%) of the non-door
window area or six (6) square feet, whichever is greater.
Flashing or rotating temporary signs.
Off-site temporary signs.
Temporary roof signs.
Temporary signs on public property or in the public right-of-way.
D. Promotional Signs in Historic Old Town Temecula. Promotional signs in Historic
Old Town Temecula are permitted in the C-l, C-P, C-P-S, and M-SC zones and shall comply
with the requirements listed below:
1. In any one (1) T&,nl~o, ary SignEvent, attached and window signs may be
used in any combination ptovidod that the total. sign face area for all promotional signs,
including attached and window promotional aigns, does not exceed twelve (12) square fort.
For tmch uoo or bunine~s activity; up to ono (1) nttnched promotional sign tony be allowed.
2. Promotional signs in Historic Old Town Temecuh shall be attached to the
building where the use or business activity is located and shah comply with the following
requirements:
a. The maximum height of the top of any temporary sign shall not
exceed the top of the eave line or parapet wall of the building where the use or activity is
located. No promotional sign shall be erected or phced so as to interfere with normal pedestrian
and vehicular traffic.
b. The surface area shall not exceed twelve (12) square feet.
c. Promotional signs shall be made of non-glossy material with a
fabric or cloth-like appearance and shall use dull, non-primary, non-fluorescent, and non-
iridescent colon.
R:~WFAFFRP'BTRMPSIGN.SAR 3/29/93 klb 13
3. The maximum consecutive duration for any promotional sign, for any
business use or activity is one temporary sign .event. Temponu~ sign events may not be
combined to cx~eate .loug~n' .consecutive time. ixriods for temporary signs. Between each
temporary sign event a pP, riod of at least 15 days must elapse b~fore any promotional signs can
be b-l~t~, placed or in~uiled., shnH not exceed any of the foilow4ng prc~cribcd time periods:
a®
conso~utiv~ dayn); or,
Up to two (2) consecutive Temporary Sign Events, (ie. thirty (30)
b. A total of four (4) Tompornry Sign Events per calendar year.
E. Grand Opening. Interim and Special Event Signs in Historic Old Town Temecula.
Grand opening, interim, and special event signs in Historic Old Town Temecula are permitted
in the C-1, C-P, C-P-S, and M-SC zones and shall comply with the requirements listed below:
1. For each use or business activity; up to one (1) grand opening or interim
sign may be allowed.
2. Grand opening signs are permitted once in the tint ninety (90) days of
business operation.
3. Interim signs are for interim and emergency purposes and shah contain
oily the business name and logo.
4. Special event signs for special events shall be located close to the activity
or event being advertised.
5. Signs for communitywide events and activities, such as the Tractor Races
or the Ternecula Wine and Balloon Festival, are nilowed only on the site of the proposed event
and are issued only to the organization or individuals organizing or promoting the event.
6. Grand opening, interim and special event signs in Historic Old Town
Temecula shall be attached to the building when the use or activity is located and shah comply
with the following requLrements:
a. The maximum height of the top of any sign shah not exceed the top
of the eave line or parapet wall of the building when the use or activity is located.
b. The dimensions of any grand opening, interim or special event signs
shall not exceed a surface area of twelve (12) square feet.
c. Shah be made of non-glossy material with a fabric or cloth-like
appearance and shall use dull, non-primary, non-~uorescent, and non-iridescent colors.
st:~s~r,,mu~Tn2~sxeN.3^n 3/'29/93 k~ 14
d. Grad opening, interim and special event Signs may be allowed for
any period up to forty-five (45) days. The Director of Planning may allow one time extension,
for any period up to thirty (30) days, with good cause. It is the responsibility of the proponent
of the extension to justify why the extension is appropriate.
F. Hardship Provision. The Director of Planning may appwve a Hardship Situation
Temporary Sign-Permit in Historic Old Town Temecuh in cases of extreme hardship and
unusual circumstances relating to the property where the business is located, including off-site
construction activities that may disrupt the public's access to the business. Hardship Situation
Temporary Signs shall be granted only when, because of special circumstances applicable to the
property, the strict application of the Temporary Sign Ordinance deprives the property of
privileges enjoyed by other property in the vicinity and under the identical zoning chssification.
1. The proponent of a request for a hardship situation temporary sign shall
be responsible for clearly demonstrating that an extreme hardship and unusual circumstance
exists, and that the extreme hardship and unusual circumstances warrants the approval of a
hardship situation temporary sign, and that strict implementation of the Temporary Sign
Ordinance deprives the property of privileges enjoyed by other pwperty in the vicinity and under
the identical zoning chssification.
2. The Director of Planning may issue a Temporary Sign PermR for a
hardship situation for any period up to six (6) months. Determination of the number, size, and
location of temporary signs for hardship situations shall be at the discretion of the Director of
Planning.
3. Any hardship temporary sign permit issued shall be conditioned to ensure
that said permit does not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations
upon other properties in the vicinity and in the same zone, to ensure compatibility with the
surrounding area and the Old Town Specific Plan, and to protect the public health, safety or
weftare."
Section 5. Grandfather Chuse Those temporary signs established prior to the
Effective Date of this ordinance, with the exception of those temporary signs described in
Section 19.9(B)(1), (3) and (13), and Section 19.10(C)(1), (3) and (13), are hereby grandfathered
and permitted through ~~i April 13, 1993. After said date, no temporary signs may be
established unless otherwise permitted under this Ordinance.
Section 6. Violations It shall be unlawful for any person to viohte any
pwvision of this ordinance. Any person riobring any provision of this ordinance shall be
deemed guilty of an infraction or misdemeanor as hereinafter specified. Such person shall be
deemed guilty of a separate offense for each and every day or portion thereof during which any
vioh~on of any of the provisions of this ordinance is committed, continued, or permitted.
Any person so convicted shall be, (1) guilty of an infraction offense and punished by a fme not
exceeding One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) for a first viohtion; and (2) guilty of an infraction
offense and punished by a fme not exceeding Two Hundred Dollars ($200.00) for a second
infraction. A third and any additional violation shall constitute a misdemeanor offense and shall
be punishable by a free not to exceed One Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00) or six (6) months in
jail, or both. Notwithstanding the above, a first offense may be charged and prosecuted as a
misdemeanor. Payment of any penalty herein shall not relieve a person from the responsibility
for correcting any violation.
Section 7. Scvembility The City Council hereby declares that the pwvisions
of this Ordinance are sevcmblc and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold
any sentence, paragraph, or section of this ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect
the validity of the remaining pans of this ordinance.
Section 8. CEQA Compliance The City Council finds that the regulation of
temporary signs in existing commercial, industrial, and retail zones has no possibility of having
a significant impact on the enviroment. As a result, the adoption of these regulations is exempt
from environmental review pursuant to the provisions of Section 15061(b)(3) of the State CEQA
Guidelines prepared pursuant to Section 21083 of the California Enviromental Quality Act, as
mended.
Section 9. Effective Date This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty
(30) days after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and
cause copies of this Ordinance to be posted in three designated posting places.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPT~D, this day of
,1993.
SAL mr Oz
MAYOR
R:~TAI~TRI~IGN.3Aa 3/29/93 klb 16
ATrF.~T:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFO~)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, HEREBY DO CERTIFY that the
foregoing Ordinance No.93- was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a
regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the day of , 1993,
and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City
Council of the City of Temecula on the day of ,1993, by the following roll call vote:
NOF~:
COUNCIIJVIRMBF_aS:
COUNCILMIB,fBERS:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
R:~Ta~iU~IO~.3AR 3/29~ ~ 17
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
ORDINANCE NO. 93-__
R:~STAFFRPT~TID~PSION.3AI 3/29/93 klb 18
ATTACttMENT NO. 2
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF ~ CITY COUNCIL FOR ~ CITY OF
TEMECULA ~ING FORTIONS OF ORDINANCE NO. 348 AND 92-
16 PERTAINING TO ~ REGULATION OF TEMPORARY SIGNS.
The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby ordain as follows:
Section 1. Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby makes the
following findings:
A. That the City Council is authorized by Section 65850(b) of State Planning and
Zoning Law, to adopt ordinances regulating signs and billboards;
B. That there is a need to improve the competitiveness of service and commercial
businesses and maintain the aesthetic quality of all areE in the City;
C. That there is a need to pwvide specific and hisWrically appropriate temporary
signage in the Old Town area;
D. That reguhting temporary signage is an effective method to improve the aesthetic
quality of all areas in the City;
the City'5
re5olll-c~s.
That the ovemse of temporary signs results in visual clutter, the deterioration of
commercial and service districts, and the inefficient use of business advertising
F. That the City is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of the general
plan and that:
4. There is a reasonable pwbability that this Ordinance will be consistent with
the general plan proposal now being considered and studied.
5. There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference
with the future general plan if this Ordinance is ultimately inconsistent with the plan.
3. There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference
with the future Old Town Specific Plan if this Ordinance is ultimately inconsistent with the plan.
4. That this Ordinance complies with all the applicable requirements of State
hw and local ordinances.
G. That pursuant to City Ordinance 90-04, the City Council adopted by reference
Riverside County Ordinance No. 348, which the Council has subsequently amended through
various City Ordinances;
R:\$~qTAln~RPT~TI~!I~ION.3AR 3/29/93 kib 19
H. The City Council adopted City Ordinance 92-16, mending Ordinance No. 348,
on October 27, 1992; and,
I. That there is a need to mend Ordinance 92-16 to improve the competi~veness
of service and commercial businesses in the City.
Section 2. Paragraph z of Section 19.2 of Article XIX of Ordinance No. 348 is
hereby mended to read as follows:
"z. "Temporary Sign Event" means any number of consecutive days,
up to forty five (45), for the display of any promotional sign."
Section 3. Paragraph aa of Section 19.2 of Article XIX of Ordinance No. 348 is
hereby mended to read as follows:
"aa. ~Portable Sign" means a sign not designed to be attached to a
building or structure, vehicle or trailer. Examples of portable signs include, but are not Limited
to: A-Frames, also known as sandwich boards, and T-Frames, also known as spring-loaded
signs."
Section 4.
read as follows:
Section 19.2 of Article XIX of Ordinance No. 348 is hereby mended to
~dd. "Attached temporary sign" means a temporary sign which is
mounted, placed, or attached only to the permanent building where the business activity is
conducted.
ee. "Detached temporary sign" means a temporary sign which is
partially attached to a permanent building, attached to a temporary structure such as a pole or
pipe, or any combination of the above. Detached temporary signs do not include portable or
vehicle mounted signs.
ft. ~ A-Frame' means a portable advertisin~r device which is commonly
in the shape of an "AM, or some variation thereof, is located on the ground, is easily moveable,
and is usually two-sided."
Section S. Subsection C of Section 19.9 of Article XIX of Ordinance No. 348 is
hereby mended to read as follows:
"C. Promotional Signs. Promotional signs are permitted in the C-l, C-P, C-P-S,
C-T, and M-SC zones and shall comply with the appropriate requirements listed below:
1. In any one (1) Temporary Sign Event, attached, detached and window
signage may be used in any combination provided that the following conditions are met:
a. That the total sign face area for all pwmotional signs, including
attached, detached and window promotional signs, does not exceed fifty (50) square feet; and,
R:~$~]'AI~RF~TEMP~ION.SAR 3/29/93 klb 20
b. That the total sign face area for all detached promotional signs does
not exceed thirty two (32) square feet.
2. All promotional signs shah be located on the site where the use or activity
is located. The standards for the various types of promotional signs are as follows:
requirements:
a. Attached promotional signs shah comply with the following
( 1 ) The maximum height of the top of any attached promotional
sign shall not exceed the top of the eave line or parapet wall of the building where the use or
activity is located.
(2) The dimensions shall not exceed any the following:
The surface area shall not exceed fifty (50) square
(3) feet.
The height (vertical dimension) shall not exceed three
(c) The width (horizontal dimension) shall not exceed
sixty percent (60%) of the business or store frontage, whichever is smaller.
requirements:
b. Detached promotional signs shah comply with the following
( 1 ) The maximum height of the top of any detached promotional
sign shall not exceed six (6) feet above the ground.
(2) The surface area shah not exceed thirty two (32) square feet.
(3) Detached promotional signs shall be mounted to a frame.
The frame shall be constructed of attractive permanent materials and shall be constructed so that
not additional supports or bracing is required.
(4) No detached promotional sign may be permitted, placed,
erected or installed ff the detached promotional sign blocks, restricts, or impairs any of the
following:
(a) The public's view of another business or activity;
ora~v~;
The public' s view of the signage for another business
vehicle; or,
The view or visibility of the operator of any motor
R:XS~STAFFRPT~GN.3AR 3/29193 klb 21
(d) The movement of any pedestrian or motor vehicle.
c. Promotional signs that are located on window surfaces shall not
exceed twenty five percent (25 % ) of the non-door window area, except that no permit shall be
required for promotional window signs that cover ten percent (10% ) or less of the non-door
window surface area.
3. The maximum consecutive duration for promotional signs is one temporary
sign event. Temporary sign events may not be combined to create longer consecutive time
periods for temporary signs. l~tween each temporary sign event a period of at least 15 days
must elapse before any promotional signs can be erected, placed or installed."
Section 6. Subsection D of Section 19.9 of Article XIX of Ordinance No. 348 is
hereby amended to read as follows:
"D. Grand Ol~nin[,. Interim and Sl~eeial Event Signs. Grand opening, interim, and
special event signs are permitted in the C-1, C-P, C-P-S, C-T, and M-SC zones and shall
comply with the appropriate requirements listed below:
1. For each use or business activity; up to one (1) sign may be allowed.
Except for a use or business activity with frontage on two or more arterial streets, then up to
two (2) signs may be allowed.
2. Grand opening signs may be permitted once in the first ninety (90) days
of business operation.
'3. Interim signs axe for interim and emergency purposes and shall contain
only the business name and logo. Interim signs must be attached to the building.
4. Special event signs for special events shall be located close to the activity
or event being advertised.
5. Signs for communitywide events and activities, such as the Tractor Races
or the Temecula Wine and Balloon Festival, are allowed only on the site of the proposed event
and are issued only to the organization or individuals organizing or promoting the event.
6. All Grand opening, interim and special event signs shall be located on the
site where the use or activity is located. The standards for these types of signs axe as follows:
a. Attached grand opening, interim and special event signs shall
comply with the following requirements:
(1) The maximum height of the top of any sign shall not exceed
the top of the cave line or parapet wall of the building where the use or activity is located.
foliowing requirements:
(2)
The dimensions of any sign shall not exceed any the
St:~SXS'TAmUmTnm, SIaN.S~ 3~t93 Ub 22
(a) The surface area shall not exceed thirty (30) square
feet.
(3) feet.
The height (vertical dimension) shaft not exceed three
(c) The width (horizontal dimension) shall not exceed
f'h~ percent (50 % ) of the business or store frontage, whichever is smaller.
b. Detached grand opening and special event signs shall comply with
the following requirements:
(1) The maximum height of the top of any detached grand
opening and special event signs shall not exceed six (6) feet.
(2) The dimensions of any detached grand opening and special
event signs shah not exceed any the following requirements:
The surface area shall not exceed thirty (30) square
(3) feet.
The height (vertical dimension) shall not exceed three
ten (10) feet.
The width (horizontal dimension) shall not exceed
(3) Detach~ promotional signs shall be mounted to a frame.
The frame shall be constructed of attractive permanent materia]s and shall be constructed so that
not additional supports or bracing is required.
(4) No detached grand opening and special event signs may be
permitted, placed, erected or installed if the detached grand opening and special event signs
blocks, restricts, or impairs any of the following:
(a) The publlc's view of another business or activity;
or activity;
The public' s view of the signage for another business
vehicle; or,
(c)
The view or visibility of the operator of any motor
(d) The movement of any pedestrian or motor vehicle.
R:~S~qTAFFRP"~TF. MPSIGN.3A]~ 3,'~9/93 Hb 23
c. Grand opening, interim and special event signs may be allowed for
any period up to forty-five (45) days. The Director of Planning may allow one time extension,
for any period up to thirty (30) days, with good cause. It is the responsibility for the proponent
of the extension to justify why the extension is appropriate. ~
Section 7. Subsection D of Section 19.10 of Article XIX of Ordinance No. 348 is
hereby mended to road as follows:
"D. Promotional Sit, ns in Historic Old Town Temecula. Promotional signs in Historic
Old Town Temecula are permitted in the C-l, C-P, C-P-S, and M-SC zones and shall comply
with the requirements listed below:
1. In any one (1) Temporary Sign Event, attached and window signage may
be used in any combination provided that the total sign face area for all promotional signs,
including attached and window promotional signs, does not exceed twelve (12) square feet.
2. Promotional signs in Historic Old Town Temecuh shall be attached to the
building where the use or business activity is located and shall comply with the foliowing
requirements:
a. The maximum height of the top of any temporary sign shah not
exceed the top of the eave line or parapet wall of the building where the use or activity is
located. No promotional sign shah be erected or phced so as to interfere with normal pedestrian
and vehicular traffic.
b. The surface area shah not exceed twelve (12) square feet.
c. Promotional signs shah be made of non-glossy material with a
fabric or cloth-like appearance and shall use dull, non-primary, non-fiuorescent, and non-
iridescent colon.
3. The maximum consecutive duration for any promotional sign, for any
business use or activity is one temporary sign event. Temporary sign events may not be
combined to create longer consecutive time periods for temporary signs. Between each
temporary sign event a period of at least 15 days must elapse before any promotional signs can
be erected, placed or installed.
Section 8. Grandfather Chuse Those temporary signs established prior to the
Effective Date of this ordinance, with the exception of those temporary signs described in
Section 19.9(B)(1), (3) and (13), and Section 19.10(C)(1), (3) and (13), are hereby grandfathered
and permitted through October 12, 1993. After said date, no temporary signs may be
established unless otherwise permitted under this Ordinance.
Section 9. CEOA Compliance The City Council fmds that the regnhtion of
temporary signs in existing commercial, industrial, and retail zones has no possibility of having
a significant impact on the environment. As a result, the adoption of these reguhtions is exempt
from environmental review pursuant to the provisions of Section 15061(b)(3) of the State CEQA
R:~S~rAFFRP~TBMPSlON.3AR 3/29/93 klb 24
Guidelines prepared pursuant to Section 21083 of the California Environmental Quality Act, as
amended.
Section 10. Effective Date This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty
(30) days after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and
cause copies of this Ordinance to be posted in three designated posting places.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, this day, the __ day of__
,1993.
J. s a, rRoz
MAYOR
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CAII~ORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, I-II~WRy DO CERTIFY that the
foregoing Ordinance No.93- was duly introduced and placed upon its fLrSt reading at a
regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the day of , 1993,
and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City
Council of the City of Temecula on the __ day of ,1993, by the following roll call vote:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNTERS:
June S. Greek, City'Clerk
R:xs~r~,w?.m~Tm~sm~.3~ 3/29so ~ 25
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
MARCH I PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT AND MINUTES
~:~S~F~T~Tn~S~C~.3^e 3~m ~b 26
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
March 1, 1993
APPLICANT:
PROPOSAL:
LOCATION:
PURPOSE
Case No.: Amendments to the Ordinance Regulating Temporary Signs
Prepared By: David W. Hogan
RECOMMENDATION: ADOPT Resolution No. 93- recommending adoption of an
ordinance entitled:
"A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR THE
CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY
COUNCIL AMEND PORTIONS OF ORDINANCE NO. 348 AND 92°
16 PERTAINING TO THE REGULATION OF TEMPORARY SIGNS,"
APPLICATION INFORMATION
City of Temecula
An Ordinance Amending the Standards for Temporary Signs.
Citywide
The purpose of this Staff Report is to forward proposed amendments to the Ordinance
Regulating Temporary Signs to the Planning Commission and City Council for their
consideration.
BACKGROUND
The City Council approved the Ordinance Regulating Temporary Signs and associated Fee
Resolution on October 27, 1992. After the public hearing on the proposed ordinance, the City
Council instructed Staff to do the following:
Amend the Ordinance to provide a six month moratorium on the enforcement of the
temporary sign regulations, except for temporary signs located in the public right-of-
way and on vehicles;
2. Initiate a program to remove all temporary signs from the public right-of-way;
3. Add new members to the Temporary Sign Committee;
Have the Committee reconsider the allowable time periods for temporary signs and
standards for detached temporary signs and make a recommendation to the City
Planning Commission; and,
STAFFRF~TEMPSIGN.3PC 1
Return any recommended ordinance amendments to the City Council in about 6
months.
DISCUSSION
On February 1, 1993, the City sent letters to the 32 members of the expanded Temporary
Sign Committee. in response, six Committee members attended the February 10, 1993,
meeting of the Temporary Sign Committee. The members present included representatives
of local retail, real estate and sign companies. The Committee met to discuss possible
standards for detached temporary signs and to reconsider the allowable time periods for
temporary signs as requested by the City Council.
The allowable time periods for temporary signs was the first issue considered by the
Temporary Sign Committee. It was the consensus of the committee members present that
the current Ordinance Regulating Temporary Signs was too restrictive and that temporary
signs should be allowed for longer periods of time so that struggling local businesses could
stay in business. Initial Committee proposals focused on the idea of allowing temporary signs
for 50% of the year. This proposal, which was eventually rejected by the Temporary Sign
Committee, would have allowed temporary promotional signs for up to twelve 15-Day
Temporary Sign Events per year. Two temporary sign events could be combined to may a
single 30 day period.
After some discussion, the Committee felt that allowing temporary promotional signs for only
half the year would not be sufficient to keep local small businesses in operation. As a result,
the Committee recommended that temporary promotional signs be allowed up to 75% of the
year on a 45-day on and 15-day off pattern. In addition, the Temporary Sign Committee felt
that the City should continue it's moratorium on enforcement of City temporary sign
regulations for an additional 6 months.
However, staff is concerned that allowing nearly constant use of temporary signs may result
in increased visual blight and clutter and could ultimately reduce' property values in the City's
commercial and service districts. Staff recognizes that there is a need for local businesses
to have the opportunity to advertise special events and sales during the year. During the
initial meetings of the Temporary Sign Committee, the Committee discussed what temporary
signs are intended to do and when they should be used. At those meetings, the Committee
arrived at the following consensus on temporary signs.
That temporary signs are often needed during the initial start-up period for new
businesses until the permanent signage is available.
· That temporary signs are often needed during special sales or promotional activities.
· The permit process for temporary signs should be an easy, over-the-counter process.
· That temporary signs can provide for unfair competition.
· That all businesses need to be regulated equally.
That temporary signs are not an alternative to a "cheap" low visibility site or poor
marketing.
STAFFRPT~TEMPSIGN.3PC 2
That excessive signage creates the image of a low quality community and could result
in visual blight and clutter.
· That temporary signs can obstruct the view of other businesses and their signs.
· That special standards are needed for Old Town Temecula.
Staff is concerned that the use of temporary promotional signs for up to 75% or 274 days
per year would result in temporary signs becoming de facto permanent signs. However, Staff
has included the 45-day on and 15-day off provision for temporary promotional signs in the
proposed amendments to the Ordinance Regulating Temporary Signs.
The second issue considered by the Temporary Sign Committee was whether or not to permit
detached temporary signs. Detached temporary signs which are not attached to a building,
but could be attached to posts or trees. The Committee recommended that detached
temporary signs be allowed. During the discussion which followed, the Committee members
determined that 32 square feet should be the maximum size for detached temporary signage.
It was also decided that detached temporary signage should not be allowed to block the
visibility of other businesses or their signs, block vehicular or pedestrian access, or obstruct
the view of motorists.
Initially staff envisioned an over-the-counter permit process which would not require extensive
plans or measurements. However, staff is concerned that allowing detached temporary signs
would require more detailed site plans for the permit review process to ensure that the signs
will not block the visibility of other businesses or their signs, impair vehicular and pedestrian
access, or obstruct the view of motorists. Furthermore, staff is also concerned that the City
could potentially be found to be liable if an accident were to occur because a detached
temporary sign impaired a driver's or pedestrian's visibility.
Staff would be more comfortable with detached temporary signs if there were a requirement
that the detached signs be mounted in a stable and durable frame. This requirement would
eliminate the potential safety problems associated with having rope or wire stretched between
trees or poles. The requirement to mount detached temporary signs in a frame has been
included in the proposed amendments.
CONCLUSION
The proposed amendments to the Ordinance Regulating Temporary Signs would amend
portions of Sections 19.9 and 19.10 of Article XIX, Ordinance 348 as recommended by the
Temporary Sign Committee. Specifically this attached ordinance amendments would do the
following:
· Extend the allowable time periods for promotional temporary signs from a maximum
of 60 days per year to 274 days per year;
Provide standards for detached temporary signs, which do not block the visibility of
other businesses, other business signage, or operator of a motor vehicle, up to 32
square feet in areas outside of Historic Old Town Temecula; and,
STAFFRF~TEMPSIGN.3PC 3
· Continue the moratorium on the enforcement of the temporary sign regulations on
private property for an additional six-months.
FUTURE GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY
Staff has reviewed the Draft General Plan and compared it with the proposed amendments
to the Ordinance Regulating Temporary Signs. During the review, staff was unable to identify
any policies or programs which would prohibit the proposed ordinance amendments. As a
result, staff can not find'the proposed amendments to be inconsistent with the Draft City
General Plan·
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
This Ordinance amendment will expand the use of temporary signs for limited periods in
existing commercial and service districts. As a result, the proposed Ordinance Regulating
Temporary Signs does not have the potential to cause significant impacts on the environment
and the project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to Section 15061 (b)(3).
FINDINGS
There is a need to improve the competitiveness of service and commercial businesses
and maintain the aesthetic quality of all areas in the City.
The overuse of temporary signs results in visual clutter, the deterioration of the City's
commercial and service districts, and the inefficient use of business advertising
resources.
The proposed amendments to the Ordinance Regulating Temporary Signs will provide
for effective identification.
There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the
future General Plan if this Ordinance is ultimately inconsistent with the General Plan.
There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the
future Old Town Specific Plan if this Ordinance is ultimately inconsistent with the Plan·
Attachments:
Resolution - Blue Page 5
Combined Redline/Strike-out Draft of the Temporary Sign Regulations - Blue Page 8
Ordinance - Blue Page 22
STAFFRPT%TEMPSIGN,3PC 4
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
Commissioner Hoagland asked if the applicant has a plot plan.
MARCH 1, 1993
Safa Muhtaseb, 39930 Whitewood Road, Unit 106, Murrieta, owner and applicant,
stated that he is workin. g on the zone change at this time and when completed, the
project will proceed to the engineering stage.
It was moved by Commissioner Chiniaeff, seconded by Commissioner Hoagland to
close the public hearing at 6:20 P.M. and Recommend Adoption of the Negative
Declaration for Change of Zone No. 23 and Recommend Adoption of Resolution No.
PC 93-04 recommending Approval of Change of Zone No. 23.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES:
3 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Chiniaeff, Hoagland
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: 2 COMMISSIONERS: Ford, Fahey
Outdoor Advertisinq Disolav Ordinance
Matthew Fagan presented ~he staff report.
Commissioner Chiniaeff questioned why the provisions dealing with hardship cases
were eliminated.
Assistant City Attorney 'John Cavanaugh advised that because it is difficult to
determine what a hardship is, it leaves an opportunity for anyone to declare a hardship,
therefore the City Attorney recommends deleting the hardship clause.
Vice Chairman Blair opened the public hearing at 6:25 P.M.
Commissioner Chiniaeff questioned if there is a "sunset" clause on non-conforming
signs.
Assistant City Attorney Cavanaugh advised that non-conformity creates an issue
where if the City required non-conforming signs to come down, the City would have
to compensate the owner.
It was moved by Commissioner Hoagland, seconded by Commissioner Chiniaeff to
close the public hearing at 6:25 P.M. and Adoot Resolution No. PC 93-05
recommending the City Council adopt the Ordinance No. 93 - (next) relative to outdoor
advertising displays and deletion of language in Section 4(A) dealing with hardship
CaSeS.
~ PCMIN03101/93 -2-
, 3/10/93
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 3 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Chiniaeff, Hoagland
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: 2 COMMISSIONERS: Ford, Fahey
MARCH 1. 1993
Amendments to the Ordinance RegulatinQ Temoorarv Sians
Dave Hogan presented the staff report.
Commissioner Chiniaeff suggested the following modifications: 1 ) Item 4, Page 15, be
modified with a clearer definition of special events; 2) Old Town issues should be in
conformance with the Old Town Specific Plan; end 3) Page 16, E(1) should provide
examples of. hardship cases.
Dave Hogan advised that the Old Town section will be superseded by the Old Town
Specific Plan when it is adopted.
Assistant City Attorney Cavanaugh advised that ha. rdship cases will be evaluated by
staff.
Vice Chairman Blair opened the public hearing at 6:35 P.M.
Commissioner Hoagland said that he feels that none of the recommended changes
should be made. He added that he feels a proliferation and/or continued proliferation
of temporary signs takes away from the aesthetic appearance of the community and
274 days a year for allowable signage is excessive. Commissioner Hoagland
suggested leaving the ordinance as is until the comprehensive sign ordinance is
adopted. Commissioner Chiniaeff and Vice Chairman Blair concurred.
It was moved by Commissioner Hoagland, seconded by Commissioner Chiniaeff to
close the public hearing at 6:45 P.M. and recommend Denial of Resolution No. PC 93-
06recommending that the City Council amend portions of Ordinance No. 348 and 92-
16 pertaining to the regulation of temporary signs.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES:
3 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Chiniaeff, Hoagland
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: 2 COMMISSIONERS: Ford, Fahey
PCMIN03/01193
3/'10/~3
ATTACHMENT NO. 4
PC RESOLUTION
R:~S~TAFFRP~TBMPSIGN,3AR 3/29/93 kJb ~-7
PC RESOLU'HON NO. 93-06
A RESOLUTION OF ~ PLANNING COMMISSION FOR
TffE CITY OF TEIVIECULA RECOMMENDING THAT ~
CITY COUNCIL DENY Tin?. PROPOS~'T} ~lVrENTS
TO PORTIONS OF ORDINANCE NO. 348 AND 92-16
PERTAINING TO TFrE REGULATION OF TEMI'ORARY
SIGNS.
W~ERF_.AS, City Ordinance No. 90-04 was adopted by reference certain portions of the
non-codified Riverside County Ordinances, including Ordinance No. 348 ("Land Use Code"),
by the City Council for the City of Temecula; and
WI~-R!~.~xS, City Ordinance No. 92-16 was adopted by the City Council for the City
of Temecula; and
WI:~.RI~.&S, City Ordinance No. 92-16 mended portions of Ordinance No~ 348 and
provided regulations and standards for the provision of temporary signs within the City of
Temecula; and
WI:IEREAS, the current regulations and standards contained reasonable and appropriate
provisions for the use of temporary signs; and
WHEREAS, notice of the proposed Ordinance was posted at City Hall, County Library,
Raneho California Branch, the U.S. Post Office and the Temecula Valley Chamber of
Commerce; and
~AS, a public hearing was conducted on March 1, 1993, at which time interested
persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition to the proposed
amendments; and
NOW, THEREFORE, ~ PLANNING COMMISSION OF THYJ CITY OF
TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE, AND FIND AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That some businesses are struggling fmancially to start in business in
Temecula and the primary reasons for these problems include: that there more businesses than
can be supported by the area economy, that some businesses are located in places which do not
provide adequate visibility or access; and that some businesses are located in buildings which
were not designed for retail businesses.
Section 2. That allowing additional temporary signs for greater periods of time will no~
solve or address these underlying problems businesses.
Section 3. The proposed amendments to the Ordinance Regulating Temporary Signs
would contribute to additional visual clutter and deterioration in commercial districts of the City:
STAFFRP3'~TEIVI=SIGN.3NO
Section 4. That the proposed mendmenU to the Ordinance Regulating Temporary Signs
will not be consistent with the City's General Plan when it is adopted.
Section S. That the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council deny and
not adopt the proposed amendments to the Ordinance Regulating Temporary Signs. The
proposed amendments to the Ordinance which are incorporated into this resolutions by this
reference and marked with Attachment "2".
pASSErl, APPROV!~r) AND ADOPTED
this 1st day of h, .1993.
I I:~]~ERy CERT~Y that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 1st day of March,
1993 by the following vote of the Commission:
AYES: 3
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 2
COMMISSIONERS: BLAIR, CHINIAI~F, HOAGLAND
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS: FAHEY, FORD
SECRETARY
,
STAFFRPTt. TEMlaSlGN. 3NO
ITEM NO.
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY ~
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning.
April 13, 1993
An Urgency Ordinance of the Temecula City Council Establishing Regulations
for the Use of Outdoor Advertising Displays
PREPARED BY:
Matthew Fagan, Assistant Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council:
Adopt an Ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 93-
AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS FOR THE USE OF OUTDOOR
ADVERTISING DISPLAYS
And Adopt an Ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 93-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS FOR THE USE OF OUTDOOR
ADVERTISING DISPLAYS
BACKGROUND
The Temecula City Council has previously adopted Ordinances regulating the establishment
of outdoor advertising displays (reference Attachment No. 2). Outdoor Advertising Displays
have been prohibited in the City of Temecula since April 24, 1990. Ordinance No. 92-06,
which presently regulates outdoor advertising displays, will expire on April 28, 1993. No
subsequent Sign Ordinance has been adopted by the City of Temecula, therefore, Planning
Staff is bringing the current ordinance before the City Council to establish permanent
regulations for the use of Outdoor Advertising Displays.
The current Ordinance was before the Planning Commission on March 1, 1993. The
Commission (Commissioners Ford and Fahey were absent) recommended that the City Council
approve the current Ordinance with the deletion of the hardship provision.
R:~S%STAFFRPT~OUTDOOR. CC 416/93 Idb 1
DISCUSSION
Planning Commission Recommendation to Delete "Hardship" Provision
Planning Staff brought the current Ordinance before the Planning Commission on March 1,
1993. At the March 1, 1993 meeting, Staff requested direction from the Planning
Commission relative to Section 4.A of the Ordinance which was a hardship provision. Prior
to the Planning Commission meeting, Staff requested clarification of the hardship provision
by the City Attorney. The City Attorney advised staff to eliminate the hardship clause from
the current Ordinance. The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council delete
Section 4.A. from the current Ordinance relative to hardships.
Deletion of the One Year "Sunset" Clause
Section 10 of Ordinance No. 92-06 stated: "This Ordinance shall expire upon one year
following its effective date." Planning Staff deleted this section from the proposed Ordinance
due to the fact that the proposed Ordinance needs to remain in effect until it is replaced by
a comprehensive City sign ordinance which includes regulating Outdoor Advertising Displays.
The Planning Commission concurred with this recommendation.
City Council Adoption of Current Ordinance by Uraencv Measures
Due to the fact that Ordinance No. 92-06 (which presently regulates outdoor advertising
displays) will expire on April 28, 1993, Staff is recommending that the City Council adopt the
current ordinance by Urgency Measure pursuant to Section 36934 of the Government Code.
This section permits the City Council to adopt the Ordinance upon its introduction at the
regular meeting of the City Council. Pursuant to Section 36937 of the Government Code, an
ordinance takes effect immediately if it is an ordinance "For the immediate preservation of the
public peace, health or safety, containing a declaration of the facts constituting the urgency,
and is passed by a four-fifths vote of the City Council." The current Ordinance will continue
the preservation of the public health by maintaining the regulations for outdoor advertising
displays until they are addressed in a Comprehensive Sign Ordinance·
As a safeguard measure, the City Attorney has recommended that the City Council also adopt
a standard Ordinance with the same provisions as the Ordinance adopted by Urgency
Measure.
FISCAL IMPACT
None.
Attachments:
2.
3.
4.
Ordinance No. 93- - Page 3
Ordinance No. 93- - Page 9
Planning Commission Minutes (Draft), March 1, 1993 - Page 15
Planning Commission Staff Report, March 1, 1993 - Page 16
R:~S%STAFFRPT~OUTDOOR. CC 4/6/93 klb 2
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
ORDINANCE NO. 93-__
R:~S~STAFFRP'hOUTDOOR.CC 416/93 Idb 3
ORDINANCE NO. 93--
AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF ~ TEMECULA CITY
COUNCIL ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS FOR THE USE
OF OUTDOOR ADVERTISING DISPLAYS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Findings That the Temecula City Council hereby makes the following
findings:
Pursuant to Government Code Seerion 65360, a newly incorporated City shall adopt a
general plan within thirty (30) months following incorporation. During that 30-month period
of time, the City is not subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or the
requirements of state law that its decisions be consistent with the general plan, if all of the
following requirements are met:
A. The City is proceeding in a timely fashion with the prepararion of the General Plan.
B. The planning agency finds, in approving projects and taking other acrions, each of
the following:
1. There is a reasonable probability that the land use or action proposed will be
consistent with the General Plan proposal being considered at the current time.
2. There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with
the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with the
plan.
3. The proposed use or action complies with all other applicable requirements
of state law and local ordinances.
The Riverside County General Plan, as amended by the Southwest Area Community Plan,
(hereinafter "SWAP") was adopted prior to the incorporation of Temecula as the General Plan
for the southwest portion of Riverside County, including the area now within the boundaries of
the City. At this rime, the City has adopted SWAP as its General Plan guidelines while the City
is proceeding in a timely fashion with the prepararion of its General Plan.
The proposed land use regulations are consistent with the SWAP and meet the
requirements set forth in Section 65360 of the Government Code, to wit:
C. The City is proceeding in a timely fashion with the prepararion of the General Plan.
D. The City Council finds, in adopting land use regulations pursuant to this rifle, each
of the following:
R:'~S%STAFFRP'T~OUTDOOR.CC 416/93 klb 4
1. There is reasonable probability that Ordinance No. 93- will be consistent
with the General Plan proposal being considered or studied or which will be studied within a
reasonable time.
2. There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with
the future adopted general plan if the pwposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with the
plan.
3. The proposed use or action complies with all other applicable requirements
of state law and local ordinances.
Section 2. Purpose The purpose of this Ordinance is to set forth the development
standards for the installation and maintenance of outdoor advertising displays within all land-use
zones of the City. The purpose of these reguhtions is to ensure that the design and location of
outdoor advertising displays are consistent with the health, safety, and aesthetic objectives of the
City.
It is a desire of the City that the design of this community be of the highest quality, that
new development be architecturally distinctive as well as homogeneous in design, and that
accessory facilities be compatible with the overall theme. The quality of signage plays a very
distinctive role in achieving the above. When abused, signs can create a visual blight which
detracts from the quality of the environment and an individual's visual perception of the City.
Recognizing that the primary purpose of signs is proper business identification, the
regulations of this Ordinance are enacted to:
A. Ensure that signs erected within the City are compatible with their surroundings and
are in keeping with the policies of the City;
B. Provide for the identification of businesses and should not be used for advertising
purposes;
C. Promote waf~c safety and community identity while also enhancing the quality of the
visual environment of the City; and
D. Establish regulations which control outdoor advertising displays within the City.
Section 3. Definitions For purposes of this Ordinance, the following words, terms,
phrases, and their derivations, shall have the meanings given herein. Then consistent with the
context, words used in the present tense singular include the plural.
A. "Commercial Off-Premise Sign" means any sign structure advertising an
establishment, merchandise, service, or entertainment, which is not sold, produced,
manufactured, or furnished at the property on which the sign is located. A commercial off-
premise sign may be commonly known or referred to as an off-premises billboard.
R:XS~STAFFRPT~OUTDOOR.CC 416/93 klb 5
B. "Non-Commercial Off-Premise Sign" means any sign structure exhibiting non-
commercial speech or message in lieu of commercial sign copy; and any sign structure exhibiting
non-commercial signing unrelated to the buying or selling of commodities or anything involved
and practiced.
Section 4. Prohibited Signs The establishment of the following outdoor advertising
displays are hereby prohibited and no application for sign location plan, plot plan, or other
application discretionary entitlement for a outdoor advertising display shall be accepted, acted
upon, or approved.
A. Commercial off promiscs signs, provided that upon u finding of hardship made
by the Planning Commission, following a notic~xl public hearing, a commercial off promiscs sign
may bc upproved subject to compliance with the provisiom of P, jverside County Ordinanc~ No.
~8 Article XIX. (Deleted at Planning Commk~ion Meeting on March 1, 1993).
Section 5. Exempt Outdoor Advertising Diiplays The provisions of this Ordinance shall
not apply to any application for:
A. Directional Signs, as defined in Chapter 5 of the Temecuh Municipal Code.
B. On-site advertising structures and signs (Ordinance 348, Section 19.5 of the non-
codified ordinances of the County of Riverside and adopted by the City of Temecula under
Ordinance No. 90-04).
C. Non-commercial off-premises advertising structures and signs, subject to the
following design and performance standards:
less;
Square footage of the sign board is limited to twelve (12) square feet or
2. There shall be no more than one (1) sign board per parcel;
3. Total height of a ground-mounted sign and supporting structure shall not
exceed six (6) feet;
4. No sign shall be illuminated.
Section 6. Non-conforming Outdoor Advertising Displays All outdoor advertising
displays, in any zone, hwfully constructed and erected prior to the effective date of this
Ordinance, which do not conform to the requirements of the provisions of this Ordinance for the
particular zone in which they are located, shall be accepted as non-conforming sign.
Section 7. To the extent the provisions of this Ordinance conflict with any provisions
of Article XIX of Ordinance No. 348 the provisions of this Ordinance shall apply.
R:%S%STAFFRPT%OUTDOOR. CC 416/93 Idb 6
Section 8. This Ordinance is an Urgency Ordinance for the immediate preservation of
the public peace, health and safety as it is necessary to maintain regulations for outdoor
advertising displays.
Section 9. This Ordinance begins effective immediately.
Section 10. Severability. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this
Ordinance are severable and it for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any
sentence, paragraph, or section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the
validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance.
Section 11. F. nvironmental Corqpliance. The City Council hereby finds that this project
does not have a potential for causing a significant affect on the environment. Therefore, the
project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act under Section 15061 Co) (3).
Section 12. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall
cause the same to be posted as required by laws.
PASSED, APPROVEI) AND ADOFlED this 13th day of April, 1993.
ATTF~T:
I. Sai Mu~oz, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA )
R:~.S~STAFFRPT~OUTDOOR.CC 416/93 klb 7
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, HEREBY DO CERTIFY that the
foregoing Ordinance No.93- was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a
regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 13th day of April, 1993, and
that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City
Council of the City of Temecula on the 13th day of April, 1993, by the following roll call vote:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
June S; Greek, City Clerk
R:%S%STAFFRP'r~OUTDOOR.CC 4/6/93 kJb 8
ATTACIIMF~NT NO. 2
ORDINANCE NO. 93-_
R:~,S\STAFFI:I:rr~OUTDOOR. CC 4/6/93 Idb 9
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE TEME, CULA CITY
ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS FOR THE
OUTDOOR ADVERTISING DISPLAYS
COUNCIL
USE OF
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Findings That the Temecula City Council hereby makes the following
findings:
Pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly incorporated City shall adopt a
general plan within thirty (30) months foilowing incorporation. During that 30-month period
of time, the City is not subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or the
requirements of state law that its decisions be consistent with the general plan, if all of the
following requirements are met:
A. The City is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of the General Plan.
B. The planning agency finds, in approving projects and taking other actions, each of
the following:
1. There is a reasonable probability that the land use or action proposed will be
consistent with the General Plan proposal being considered at the Current time.
2. There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with
the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with the
plan.
3. The proposed use or action complies with all other applicable requirements
of state law and local ordinances.
The Riverside County General Plan, as amended by the Southwest Area Community Plan,
(hereinafter "SWAP") was adopted prior to the incorporation of Temecula as the General Plan
for the southwest portion of Riverside County, including the area now within the boundaries of
the City. At this time, the City has adopted SWAP as its General Plan guidelines while the City
is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of its General Plan.
The proposed land use regulations are consistent with the SWAP and meet the
requirements set forth in Section 65360 of the Government Code, to wit:
C. The City is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of the General Plan.
D. The City Council finds, in adopting land use regulations pursuant to this rifle, each
of the following:
R:XS\STAFFRP'PtOUTDOOR. CC 416/93 klb 10
1. Them is reasonable probability that Ordinance No. 93- will be consistent
with the General Plan proposal being considered or studied or which will be studied within a
reasonable time.
2. There is lithe or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with
the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with the
plan.
3. The proposed use or action complies with all other applicable requirements
of state hw and local ordinances.
Section 2. Purpose The purpose of this Ordinance is to set forth the development
standards for the installation and maintenance of outdoor advertising displays within all land-use
zones of the City. The purpose of these regulations is to ensure that the design and location of
outdoor advertising displays are consistent with the health, safety, and aesthetic objectives of the
City.
It is a desire of the City that the design of this community be of the highest quality, that
new development be architecturally distinctive as well as homogeneous in design, and that
accessory facilities be compatible with the overall theme. The quality of signage plays a very
distinctive role in achieving the above. When abused, signs can create a visual blight which
detracts from the quality of the environment and an individual's visual poreeption of the City.
Recognizing that the primary purpose of signs is proper business identification, the
regulations of this Ordinance are enacted to:
A. Ensure that signs erected within the City are compatible with their surroundings and
are in keeping with the policies of the City;
B. Provide for the identification of businesses and should not be used for advertising
purposes;
C. Promote traffic safety and community identity while also enhancing the quality of the
visual environment of the City; and
D. Establish regulations which control outdoor advertising displays within the City.
Section 3. Definitions For purposes of this Ordinance, the following words, terms,
phrases, and their derivations, shall have the meanings given herein. Then' consistent with the
context, words used in the present tense singular include the plural.
A. "Commercial Off-Premise Sign' means any sign structure advertising an
establishment, merchandise, service, or entertainment, which is not sold, produced,
rnanufacmred, or furnished at the pwperty on which the sign is located. A commercial off-
premise sign may be commonly known or referred to as an off-premises billboard.
R:%S~STAFFRPT~OUTDOOR. CC 416/93 klb 11
B. "Non-Commercial Off-Premise Sign" means any sign structure exhibiting non-
commercial speech or message in lieu of commercial sign copy; and any sign structure exhibiting
non-commercial signing unrelated to the buying or selling of commodities or anything involved
and practiced.
Section 4. Prohibited Signs The establishment of the following outdoor advertising
displays are hereby prohibited and no application for sign location plan, plot plan, or other
application discretionary enti~ement for a outdoor advertising display shall be accepted, acted
upon, or approved.
A. Commcrcinl off prc, miacs signs, provided that upon a finding of hardship madc
by thc Planning Commission, following a noticed public hearing, a commercial off prcmisca sign
may bc approval subject to complianec with thc provisions of Riversidc County Ordinanec No.
348 Artictc XIX. (Deleted at Planning Comml.~ion Meeting on March 1, 1993).
Section 5. Exempt Outdoor Advertising Dilplays The provisions of this Ordinance shall
not apply to any application for:
A. Direcfional Signs, as defined .in Chapter 5 of the Temecula Municipal Code.
B. On-site advertising structures and signs (Ordinance 348, Section 19.5 of the non-
codified ordinances of the County of Riverside and adopted by the City of Temecula under
Ordinance No. 90-04).
C. Non-commercial off-premises advertising structures and signs, subject to the
following design and performance standards:
less;
Square footage of the sign board is limited to twelve (12) square feet or
2. There shall be no more than one (1) sign board per parcel;
3. Total height of a ground-mounted sign and supporting structure shall not
exceed six (6) feet;
4. No sign shall be illuminated.
Section 6. Non-conforming Outdoor Advertising DiSplays All outdoor advertising
displays, in any zone, hwfully constructed and erected prior to the effective date of this
Ordinance, which do not conform to the requirements of the provisions of this Ordinance for the
particular zone in which they are located, shall be accepted as non-conforming sign.
Section 7. To the extent the provisions of this Ordinance conflict with any provisions
of Article XIX of Ordinance No. 348 the provisions of this Ordinance shall apply.
R:%SXSTAFFRPT~OUTDOOR.CC 418/93 Idb 12
Section 8. Effective Date This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty
(30) days after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and
cause copies of this Ordinance to be posted in three designated posting places.
Section 9. Severabili~,. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this
Ordinance are severable and it for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any
sentence, paragraph, or section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the
validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance.
Section 10. Environmental Compliance. The City Council hereby finds that this project
does not have a potential for causing a significant affect on the environment. Therefore, the
project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act under Section 15061 (b) (3).
Section 11. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall
cause the same to be posted as required by laws.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPT!~D this 13th day of April 1993.
ATI'F. ST:
J. Sat Mu~oz, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA )
R:XS'~STAFFRPT~OUTDOOR,CC 416/93 klb 13
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, HEREBY DO CERTIFY that the
foregoing Ordinance No.93- was duly inU'oduced and placed upon its first reading at a
regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 13th day of April, 1993, and
that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City
Council of the City of Temecula on the 13th day of April, 1993, by the following roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
CO~CILMEMB~:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
R:~S\STAFFRPT~OUTDOOR. CC 4/6/93 Idb 14
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES (DRAFT): MARCH 1, 1993
R:%S~,STAFFRPT%OUTDOOR.CC 4/6/93 Idb 15
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
MARCH 1, 1993
A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Planning Commission was called to order Monday,
March 1, 1993, at 6:00 P.M., Vail Elementary School, 29915 Mira Loma Drive, Temecula,
California.' The meeting was called to order by Vice Chairman Billie Blair.
PRESENT: 3 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Chiniaeff, Hoagland
ABSENT: '2 COMMISSIONERS: Ford, Fahey
Also p~'esent were Assistant City Attorney John Cavanaugh, Senior Planner Debbie Ubnoske,
Senior Planner John Meyer and Minute Clerk Gall Zigler.
PUBLIC COMMENT
None
COMMISSION BUSINESS
ADDrOyal Of Aqenda
It was moved by Commissioner Chiniaeff, seconded by Commissioner Hoagland to
approve the agenda.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 3 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Chiniaeff, Hoagland
NOES: '0 COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: 2 COMMISSIONERS: Ford, Fahey
PUBLIC HEARING
2. Chanqe of Zone No. 23
Proposed. zone change for a°6.1 acre parcel from R-3-4,000 to C-O. Located on the
south side of Rancho California Road, approximately 450 feet east of the intersection
of Via Las Colinas and Rancho California Road.
Matthew Fagan presented the staff report.
'~ PCMIN03101193 -I- 3/10/93
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
MARCH 1. 1993
Commissioner Hoagland asked if the applicant has a plot plan.
Safa Muhtaseb, 39930 Whitewood Road, Unit 106, Murrieta, owner and applicant,
stated that he is working on the zone change at this time and when completed, the
project will proceed to the engineering stage.
It was moved by Commissioner Chiniaeff, seconded by Commissioner H0agland to
close the public hearing at 6:20 P.M. and Recommend Adoption of the Negative
Declaration for Change of Zone No. 23 and Recommend Adoption of Resolution No.
PC 93-04 recommending Approval of Change of Zone No. 2,3.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES:
3 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Chiniaeff, Hoagland
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: 2 COMMISSIONERS:
Outdoor Advertising Display Ordinance
Ford, Fahey.
Matthew Fagan presented the staff report.
Commissioner Chiniaeff questioned why the provisions dealing with 'hardship cases
were eliminated.
Assistant City Attorney John Cavanaugh advised that because it is difficult to
determine what a hardship is, it leaves an opportunity for anyone to declare a hardship,
therefore the City Attorney recommends deleting the hardship clause.
Vice Chairman Blair opened the public hearing at 6:25 P.M.
Commissioner Chiniaeff questioned if there is a "sunset"' clause on non-conforming
signs.
Assistant City Attorney Cavanaugh advised that non-conformity creates an issue
where if the City required non-conforming signs to come down, the City would have
to compensate the owner.
It was moved by Commissioner Hoagland, seconded by Commissioner Chiniaeff to
close the public hearing at 6:25 P.M. and AdOPt Resolution No. PC 93-05
recommending the City Council adopt the Ordinance No. 93 - (next) relative to outdoor
advertising displays and deletion of language in Section 4(A) dealing with hardship
cases,
PCMIN03/03193 -2- 3/10~93
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
MARCH 1, 1993
The motion carried as follows:
AYES:
3 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Chiniaeff, Hoagland
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: 2 COMMISSIONERS: Ford, Fahey
Amendments to the Ordinance Reaulatina TemPorarY Sians
Dave Hogan presented the staff report.
Commissioner Chiniaeff suggested the following modifications: 1 ) Item 4, Page 15, be
modified with a clearer definition of special events; 2) Old Town issues should be in
conformance with the Old Town Specific Plan; and 3) Page 16, E(1) should provide
examples of hardship cases. -,
;.
Dave Hogan advised that the Old Town section will be superseded by the Old Town
Specific Plan when it is adopted.
Assistant City Attorney Cavanaugh advised that hardship cases will be evaluated by
staff.
Vice Chairman Blair opened the public hearing at 6:35 P.M.
Commissioner Hoagland said that he feels that none of the.recommended changes
should be made. He added that he feels a proliferation and/or continued proliferation
of temporary signs takes away from the aesthetic appearance of the community and
274 days a year for allowable signage is excessive. Commissioner Hoagland
suggested leaving the ordinance as is until the comprehensive sign ordinance is
adopted. Commissioner Chiniaeff and Vice Chairman Blair concurred.
It was moved by Commissioner Hoagland, seconded by Commissioner Chiniaeff to
close the public hearing at 6:45 P.M. and recommend Denial of Resolution No. PC 93-
06recommending that the City Council amend portions of Ordinance No. 348 and 92-
16 pertaining to the regulation of temporary signs.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES:
3 COMMISSIONERS: · Blair, Chiniaeff, Hoagland
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: 2 COMMISSIONERS: Ford, Fahey
PCMIN03/01/93 -3- 3110/93
ATTACHMENT NO. 4
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
R:~,S%STAFFRPI"%OUTDOOR.CC 4/6/93 Idb 16
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
March 1, 1993
Case No.: Outdoor Advertising Displays Ordinance
RECOMMENDATION:
Prepared By: Matthew. Fagan
Consider the deletion of the I~ardship provisions of the existing
ordinance and make a recommendation to the City Council;
Provide direction to Planning Staff as to what steps should be
taken to address potential permitting of Outdoor Advertising
Displays within the City of Temecula;
ADOPT Resolution No. 93-
ordinance entitled:
recommending adoption .of an
"AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS FOR THE USE OF
OUTDOOR ADVERTISING DISPLAYS."
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT:
City of Temecula
PROPOSAL:
An Ordinance establishing regulations for the use of Outdoor
Advertising Displays.
LOCATION: City Wide
BACKGROUND
The City of Temecula has adopted a number of Ordinances regulating Outdoor Advertising
Displays. Following is a chronology of Ordinances regulating Outdoor Advertising Displays:
Ordinance No. 90-08:
Adopted on April 24, 1990 and expired on June 8, 1990.
Ordinance No. 90-08 was an urgency ordinance adopting an
interim zoning ordinance pertaining to regulations for Outdoor
Advertising Displays. Section 3 (a) stated: "Pending the
completion and adoption of the General Plan of the City of
Temecula together .with associated signage regulation for the
Land Use Code for the City of Temecula, the establishment of
Outdoor Advertising Display is hereby prohibited and no
application for sign location plan, plot plan or other applicable
discretionary entitlement for an Outdoor Advertising Display shall
be accepted, acted upon, or approved."
R:~S\STAFFRPT~OUTDOOR. PC 2124/93 tie 1
Ordinance No. 90-09:
Adopted on June 5, 1990 and expired on April 24, 1991.
Ordinance No. 90-09 was an urgency ordinance which extended
interim Ordinance No. 90-08.
Ordinance No. 91-17:
Adopted on April 23, 1991 and expired on April 23, 1992.
Ordinance No. 91-17 was an urgency ordinance which further
extended interim Ordinance No. 90-08.
Ordinance No. 92-06:
Adopted on April 28, 1992 and will expire on April 28, 1993.
Ordinance No. 92-06 is an ordinance pertaining to sign
regulations and establishes regulations for the use of Outdoor
Advertising Displays. Section 4.A. of Ordinance No. 92-06
contains a hardship provision which would permit commercial
off-premises signs, provided that a finding of hardship is made by
the Planning Commission. Following a noticed public hearing, a
commercial off-premises sign may be approved subject to
compliance with the provisions of Riverside County Ordinance
No. 348, Article XIX (Advertising Regulations).
Ordinance No. 92-07:
Adopted concurrently with Ordinance No. 92-06 as an urgency
ordinance.
DISCUSSION
Expiration of Ordinance No. 92-06
As discussed above in the Background Section, Ordinance No. 92-06 will expire on April 28,
1993. Planning Staff has determined that a permanent Ordinance establishing regulations for
the use of outdoor advertising displays should be adopted for the following reasons:
The draft General Plan contains goals within the Community Design Element which
would encourage regulation of Outdoor Advertising Displays in excess of that which
is contained in Section 19.3 of Ordinance No. 348 relative to Outdoor Advertising.
According to the draft General Plan, "the goals and policies of the Community Design
Element serve as the basis for the formulation of specific development code regulations
as well as the development design guidelines for residential and non-residbntial uses."
Goal 2 of the Community Design Element explicitly calls for: "Design excellence in site
planning, architecture, landscape architecture and signage in new development and
modifications to existing development." In addition, Goal 3 of this same Element calls
for: "Preservation and enhancement of the positive qualities of individual districts or
neighborhoods." At the current time, no mechanisms are in place which would afford
Planning Staff the regulatory authority desired/recommended in the draft General Plan
for the regulation of outdoor advertising displays.
'2.
Section V of the draft General Plan calls for implementation programs for the
Community Design Element. It is stated in Section V: "In many cases the goals,
policies and recommendations provided in the element may provide adequate
information to assist the City staff and decision-makers in their daily actions.
However, in certain cases, because of the need for special detailed studies additional
work may be necessary."
R:\S\STAFFRPT~OUTDOOR.PC 2/24/93 tie 2
Section D.2. of Section V states: "A detailed study of Sign Code provisions based
upon the General Plan policies should be conducted to assure consistency. Special
guidelines would be formulated for signage within residential, commercial and industrial
areas." This has also been the direction provided by the City Council at the April 14,
1992 meeting (see Attachment No. 3). Until this Special Study is completed, the
proposed Ordinance should remain in effect.
The "Hardship" Clause
Two applications for Outdoor' Advertising DisplaYs (Plot Plan No. 245, Amendment No. I and
Plot Plan No. 246, Amendment No. 1 ) were submitted under the hardship provision contained
in Section 4.A. of Ordinance No. 92-06. These Plot Plan applications were denied by the
Planning Commission and subsequent Appeals of these denials were denied by the City
Council. During the review process, Planning staff had difficulty determining what actually
constituted a "hardship". Subsequent to the appeals being denied, Staff requested
clarification of the hardship provision by the City Attorney. The City Attorney advised staff
to eliminate the hardship clause from the current ordinance and present the ordinance to the
City Planning Commission for consideration and recommendation to the City Council. The
hardship clause was originally placed in Ordinance No. 92-06 by the City Council (see
Attachment No. 3). However, the Council' in their consideration of the aforementioned
appeals, did not provide direction to staff with respect'to elimi'nation of the hardship clause.
Therefore, staff is requesting that the Planning Commission make a recommendation to the
City Council relative to this matter.
Effective Time Period of Proposed Ordinance
Section 10 of Ordinance No. 92-06 stated: "This Ordinance shall expire upon one year
following its effective date." Planning Staff has deleted this section from the proposed
Ordinance due to the fact that the proposed Ordinance needs to remain in effect until it is
replaced by a specific sign ordinance which regulates Outdoor Advertising Displays.
PermittinQ Process
Currently, Planning Staff is utilizing Section 19.3 of Ordinance No. 348 and the subsequently
adopted ordinances which regulate the establishment of Outdoor Advertising Displays within
the City. It is anticipated that Outdoor Advertising Displays will be addressed in a future
comprehensive sign ordinance. Until the future comprehensive sign ordinance is adopted,
Staff.will continue to utilize Ordinance No. 348 and any subsequent ordinances pertaining to
the regulation of Outdoor Advertising Displays as well as the City's future General Plan when
reviewing future applications for Outdoor Advertising Displays.
CONCLUSION
The City of Temecula City Council has adopted several Ordinances regulating the
establishment of outdoor advertising displays. Outdoor AdVertising Displays have been
prohibited in the City of Temecula since April 24, 1990. Ordinance No. 92-06 will expire on
April 28, 1993. No subsequent Sign Ordinance has been adopted by the City of Temecula
in the interim, therefore, Planning Staff is bringing the current ordinance before the Planning
Commission to extend it until a specific sign ordinance which regulates Outdoor Advertising
Displays is adopted.
RAS~STAFFRPT~OUTDOOR.PC 2124/~3 lie 3
FUTURE GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY
As discussed in the Background Section of this report, the draft General Plan contains goals
within the Community Design Element which would encourage regulation of Outdoor
Advertising Displays in excess of that which is contained in Section 19°3 of Ordinance No.
348 relative to Outdoor Advertising. In addition, Section D.2. of Section V of the Community
Design Element of the draft General Plan states: "A detailed study of Sign Code provisions
based upon the General Plan policies should be conducted to assure consistency· Special
guidelines would .be formulated for signage within residential, commercial and industrial
areas·" Until this Special Study is completed, the proposed Ordinance should remain in effect.
Based upon these draft policies, there is a likely probability that the proposed ordinance will
be consistent with the City's General Plan upon its ultimate adoption.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
This Ordinance does not have a potential for causing a significant effect on the environment.
Therefore, Staff has determined that the project is exempt from California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA) under Section 15061 (b)(3).
FINDINGS
The proposed Outdoor Advertising Displays Ordinance is necessary to bring about
eventual conformity with the City's future General Plan, specifically, the Land Use and
Community Design Elements.
There is a reasonable probability that the proposed Outdoor Advertising Display
Ordinance will be consistent with the Community Design Element of the City's future
General Plan, which will be completed in a reasonable time. 'In addition, there is a
likely probability that the Outdoor Advertising Display Ordinance will be in accordance
with the goals and/or policies of the City's future General Plan.
There is not a likely probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the
future General Plan, if the proposed policies are ultimately inconsistent with the plan,
due to the fact that policies will be adopted for the new General Plan. Therefore, it is
likely that the City will consider these policies during their preparation of the General
Plan·
Attachments:
Resolution No. 93- - Blue Page 5
Ordinance No. 93- - Blue Page 8
City Council Minutes dated April 14, 1992 - Blue Page 13
R:\S~STAFFRPT~OUTDOOR.pC 2124193 tie 4
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
PC RESOLUTION NO. 93-
R:\S'~STAFFRPT~OUTDOOR.PC 2124/93 t.j. 5
PC RESOLUTION NO. 93-
RESOLUTION OF ~ PLANNING COMMISSION OF ~
CITY OF TElVIECULA RECOMMENDING ~ CITY
COUNCIL ADOPT ~ ORDINANCE NO. 93-
1H~-I.ATIVE TO OUTDOOR ADVERTISING DISPLAYS.
WHEREAS, .City Ordinance No. 90-04 adopted by reference certain portions of the non-
codfiled Riverside County Ordinances, including Ordinance No. 348 ("Land Use Code"); and
WI:H~RRAS, such regulations do not contain adequate provisions for the use of outdoor
advertising disphys; and
~EAS, the City of Temecuh desires to reguhte the use of outdoor advertising
disphys and to protect the health, quality of life, and the environment of the residents of
Temecula; and
~, The City of Temecuh City Council has adopted several Ordinances
reguhting the establishment of outdoor advertising disphys, pwhibiting these disphys in the
City of Temecuh since April 24, 1990; and
WHF.~, a public hearing was conducted on March 1, 1993, at which time interested
persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition; and
Wnlr. R~.AS, notice of the proposed Ordinance was posted at City Hall, the 'County
Library, Rancho California Branch, the U.S. Post Office and the Temecuh Valley Chamber of
Commerce;
NOW, Tn'~,EFORE; ~ PLANNING COMMISSION OF ~ CITY OF
TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETER.MINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula hereby finds that ·
the proposed Outdoor Adverting Disphys Ordinance will provide for the establishment of
reguhtions for outdoor advertising disphys in a fair and equitable manner.
Section 2. That the Phaning Commission of the City of Temecuh further fmds that
the proposed Outdoor Advertising Displays Ordinance is necessary to bring about eventual
conformity with the General Plan' s Community Design Element.
Section 3. That the Planning Commission of the City of Temecuh hereby finds that
this Ordinance does not cause a significant affect on the environment. Therefore, the pwposed
Ordinance is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act under Section 15061 Co)(3).
R:~S\STAFFRPT%OUTDOOR.PC 2124/93 tj~ 6
Section 4. That the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula hereby
recommends to the City Council adoption of the proposed Outdoor Advertising Displays
Ordinance. The Ordinance is incorporated into this Resolution by this reference and marked
Attachment "2".
PASSI~, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 1st day of March, 1993.
LINDA L. FAHEY
I frERF. Ry CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 1st day of March,
1993 by the following vote of the Commission.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
GARY THORNI-mx.
SECRETARY
R:\S~STAFFRPT~OUTDOOR.pC 2124/93 t~ 7
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
ORDINANCE NO. 93-__
R:\S~STAFFRFI~OUTDOOR.PC 2124/93 tie 8
ORDINANCE NO. 93-
AN ORDINANCE OF ~ CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY
OF TEMECULA ESTABLISF!ING REGULATIONS FOR TFFF~
USE OF OUTDOOR ADVERTISING DISPLAYS.
~ CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES I-mRRRy ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Findings That the Temecula City Council hereby makes the following
findings:
Pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly incorporated City shall adopt a
general plan within thixty (30) months following incorporation. During that 30--month period
of time, the City is not subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or the
requirements of state law that its .decisions be consistent with the genera] plan, ff all of the
following requirements are met:
A. The City is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of the General Plan.
B. The planning agency finds, in approving projects and taking other actions, each of
the following:
1. There is a reasonable probability that the land use or action proposed will be
consistent with the General Plan proposal being considered at the current time.
2'. There is little or no pwbability of substantial detriment to or interference with
the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with the
plan.
3. The proposed use or action complies with all other applicable requirements
of state hw and local ordinances.
The Riverside County General Plan, as amended by the Southwest Area Community Plan,
(hereinafter "SWAP") was adopted prior to the incorporation of Temecuh as the General Plan
for the southwest portion of Riverside County, including the area now within the boundaries of
· the City. At this time, the City has adopted SWAP as its General Plan guidelines while the City
is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of its General Plan.
The proposed land use reguhtions are consistent with the SWAP and meet the
requirements set forth in Section 65360 of the Government Code, to wit:
C. The City is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of the General Phn.
D. The City Council finds, in adopting land use regulations pursuant to this rifle, each
of the following:
R:\S~STAFFRPT~.OUTDOOR. PC 2124193 tie 9
1. There is reasonable probability that Ordinance No. 93- will be consistent
with the General Plan proposal being considered or studied or which will be studied within a
reasonable time.
2. There is little or no pwbability of substantial detriment to or interference with
the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with the
plan.
3. The proposed use or action complies with all other applicable requirements
of state hw and local ordinances.
Section 2. Purpose The purpose of this Ordinance is to set forth the development
standards for the installation and maintenance of outdoor advertising disphys within all land-use
zones of the City. The purpose of these reguhtions is to ensure that the design and location of
outdoor advertising disphys are consistent with the health, safety, and aesthetic objectives of the
City.
It is a desire of the City that the design of this community be of the highest quality, that
new development be architecturally distinctive as well as homogeneous in design, and that
accessory facilities be compatible with the overall theme. The quality of signage phys a very
distinctive role in achieving the above. When abused, signs can create a visual blight which
detracts fwm the quality of the environment and an individual's visual perception of the City.
Recognizing that the primary purpose of signs is propor business identification, the
regulations of this Ordinance are enacted to:
A. Ensure that signs erected within the City are compatible with their surroundings and
are in keeping with the policies .of the City;
B. Provide for the identification of businesses and should not be used for advertising
purposes;
C. Promote traffic safety and community identity while also enhancing the quality of the
visual environment of the City; and
D. Establish reguhtions which control outdoor advertising disphys within the City.
Section 3. Defmitions For purposes of this Ordinance, the following words, tens,
phrases, and their derivations, shah have the meanings given herein. Then consistent with the
context, words used in the present tense singular include the plural.
A. "Commercial Off-Premise Sign" means any' sign structure advertising an
establishment, merchandise, service, or entertainment, which is not sold, produced,
manufactured, or furnished at the property on which the sign is located. A commercial off-
premise sign may be commonly known or referred to as an off-premises billboard.
R:\$\STAFFRPT~OUTDOOR.pC 2124/93 tim 10
B. "Non-Commercial Off-Premise Sign" means any sign structure exhibiting non-
commercial speech or message in lieu of commercial sign copy; and any sign structure exhibiting
non-commercial signing unrelated to the buying or selling of commodities or anything involved
and practiced.
Section 4. Prohibited Signs The establishment of the following outdoor advertising
displays are hereby prohibited and no application for sign location plan, plot plan, or other
application discretionary entitlement for a outdoor advertising display shall be accepted, acted
upon, or appmved.
A. Commercial off-premises signs, provided that upon a finding of hardship made
by the Planning Commission, follow'rag a noticed public hearing, a commercial off-premises sign
may be approved subject to compliance with the provisions of Riverside County Ordinance No.
348 Article XIX.
Section 5. Exempt Outdoor Advertising Displays The provisions of this Ordinance shall
not apply to any application for:.
A. Directional Signs, as defined in Chapter 5 of the Temecuh Municipal Code.
B. On-site advertising structures and signs (Ordinance 348, Section 19.5 of the non-
codified ordinances of the County of Riverside and adopted by the City of Temecuh under
Ordinance No. 90-04).
C. Non-commercial off-premises advertising structures and signs, subject to the
following design and performance standards:
Square footage of the sign board is limited to twelve (12) square feet or
less;
2. There shall be no more than one (1) sign board per parcel;
Total height of a ground-mounted sign and supporting structure shall not
exceed six (6) feet;
4. No sign shall be illuminated.
Section 6. Non-confonrdng Outdoor Advertising Disphys All outdoor advertising
disphys, in any zone, hwfully constructed and erected prior to the effective date of this
Ordinance, which do not conform to the requirements of the provisions of this Ordinance for the
particular zone in which they are located, shall be accepted as non-conforming sign.
Section 7. To the extent the provisions of this Ordinance conflict with any provisions
of Article XIX of Ordinance No. 348 the provisions of this Ordinance shah apply.
R:~SXSTAFFRPT~OUTDOOR.PC 2/24/93 tie 11
Section 8. Severability. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this
Ordinance are severable and it for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any
sentence, paragraph, or section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the
validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance.
Section 9. Environmental Compliance. The City Council hereby finds that this project
does not have a potential for causing a significant affect on the environment. Therefore, the
project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act under Section 15061 (b) (3).
Section 10. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall
cause the same to be posted as required by laws.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this __ day of
April 1993.
ATFF_3T:
J. Sal Mu~oz, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CAL~ORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, I-IFRh'rRy DO CERTIFY that the
foregoing Ordinance No.93- was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a
regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the day of , 1993,
and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City
Council of the City of Temecula on the __ day 0f ,1993, by the following roll call vote:
COUNCTL~,IEMB~:
NOES:
COUNCrLM~IBERS:
CO~C~ERS:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
R:~S~STAFFRPT~OUTDOOR. pC 2124193 t~ 12
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES DATED APRIL 14, 1992
R:%S\STAFFRPi'%OUTDOOR. PC 2/24193 tie 13
Council Minutes
Aoril 14. 1992
25.
Outdoor Display and Advertisina Ordinance
Director of Planning Thornhill presented the staff report and stated that an urgency
ordinance and a regular ordinance are being proposed.
Mayor Birdsall called a brief recess at 10:25 PM to change the tape. The meeting was
reconvened at 10:26 PM.
It was moved by Mayor Pro Tern Lindemans, seconded by Councilmember Parks to
extend the meeting until 11:00 PM.
The motion was unanimously carried, with Councilmember Mu~oz absent.
Mayor Birdsall opened the public hearing at 10:26 PM.
Bob Adams, Adams Advertising Inc., 19081 Rocky Road, Santa Ana, requested that
the City Council consider allowing certain types of billboards in the City. He presented
the City Council with packets showing different designs for billboards using a western
motif. He requested that the hardship clause, allowing for exemption upon review by
the Planning Director be included. He also requested that input from the Billboard
Industry be obtained in revising the Outdoor.Advertising .Ordinance.
Evelyn Harker, 31130-85 South General Kearny Road, requested that billboards be
allowed in certain 'areas of the City, stating they are helpful in publicizing special
events and advertising Old Town Temecula and the wineries.
Mayor Birdsall closed the public hearing at 10:35 PM.
Councilmember Parks asked why the hardship clause was removed.
Director of Planning Thornhill stated it is difficult to make findings without criteria in
place. He stated he would feel more comfortable with review going to the Planning
Commission, rather than the Planning Director.
Mayor Birdsall asked why two ordinances are necessary. City Attorney Field stated
that the regular ordinance runs out on the 23rd of this month and the urgency
ordinance would be in effect between this meeting and when the regular ordinance
takes effect in 30 days.
Councilmember Parks stated he would like to see this ordinance researched further and
possibly establish zones where billboards can be placed.
City Manager Dixon explained without a City ordinance in place, the county ordinance
would go into effect. He recommended that the Council adopt the urgency ordinance
tonight and initiate the first reading of the permanent ordinance and instruct staff that
r 04/22/92
Min\Oz~l 4\92 -1 ~,-
Aori| 14. 1992.
City Council Minutes
as the general plan process goes forward, 1~o meet with representatives from the
billboard industry in developing a long term ordinance.
Mayor Pro Tern Lindemans stated he would be in favor of that recommendation if it
could be amended to be reviewed in six months.
Councilmember Parks stated he would like to see the hardship clause included. City
Manager Dixon stated he would prefer review by the Planning Commission rather'than
the Planning Director. He also recommended .the "sunset clause" be for one year
instead of six months which will be more in line with completion of the General Plan.
RECESS
Mayor Birdsall called a recess at 10:54 PiVt. The meeting was reconvened at 11:01 PM.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Lindemans to extend the
meeting until 11:30 PM. The motion was unanimously carried, with Councilmember Mu~oz
absent.
The City Attorney read an additional hardship condition for Section 4 as follows:
"4. A. Commercial off-premises signs, provided that upon a finding of hardship made
by the Planning Commission, following a noticed public hearing, a commercial off-
premises sign may be approved subject to compliance with the provisions of Riverside
County ordinance No. 348 Article XIX."
The City Attorney read an addition of a "Sunset" clause to the regular ordinance which
should read as follows:
"This ordinance shall expire one year following its effective date."
It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans, seconded by Councilmember Moore to
introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 92-06
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
PERTAINING TO SIGN REGULATIONS AND ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS FOR
THE USE OF OUTDOOR ADVERTISING DISPLAYS
The motion was unanimously carried, with Councilmember Mu~oz absent.
Mi n~04~ 14\92 - 15- 04~22~92
April 14, 1992
City Council Minutes
It was moved by Mayor Pro Tern Lindemans, seconded by Councilmember Moore to
adop~ an urgency ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 92-07
AN URGENCY ORDINANCE. OF .THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA PERTAINING TO 'SIGN REGULATIONS AND ESTABLISHING
REGULATIONS FOR THE USE OF OUTDOOR ADVERTISING DISPLAYS
The motion was unanimously carried, with Councilmember Mu~oz absent.
Councilmember Parks requested a study group be. established to review this ordinance
and allow enough time for City Council review.
Mayor Birdsall requested this committee be comprised of a member of the City
Council, Planning Commission, City staff, representatives of the billboard industry, and
merchants.
26.
Ordinance Granting Approval Authority for Subdivision and Land Use Application
Decisions
Director of Planning Thornhill presented the staff report.
Mayor Birdsall opened the public hearing at 11:07 PM.
It was moved by Councilmember'Lindemans, seconded by Councilmember Moore to
continue the public hearing until the meeting of May 12, 1992.
The motion was unanimously carried, with Councilmember Mu~oz absent.
29. Temporary Paving of Parking Lot at 6th Street and Front Street
30. Maintenance of Streets Not Within the Maintained Road System
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Moore to
continue Items 29 and 30 to the next available agenda.
The motion was unanimously Carried, with Councilmember Mu~oz absent.
,/"" 04122192
Min\04\l 4~92 -16-
ITEM NO. 13
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY c~~~_~
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: Mary Jane McLarney, Finance Officer
DATE: April 13, 1993
SUBJECT: Community Services Funding Request Recommendations
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council review and approve or revise the
attached recommendations in response to applications received from community
services groups.
DISCUSSION: At the meeting of January 19, 1993 Council appointed a
Community Services Ad Hoc Committee to review requests for funding from
community services groups. Attached are the recommendations of the Ad Hoc
Committee, which amount to $70,000.
FISCAL IMPACT: The unencumbered balance in the City Council discretionary
account is approximately $77,000 after approval of the mid-year budget.
Attachments:
Community Services Funding Request Detail
0 0 g ~ g o
o o o
~o~
o
~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0
m ~m o d o d
0
o
E ~ o
o ~
> w w ~ u E w
E ~ o = ~ ~ E
~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ o ~ o
~ w o w ~ w ~
~ ~ >>> E~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m o
w w: w w w w ~ E
E Eo E E E E ~ ~ c
ITEM NO. lzl-
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY ~
FINANCE OFFICE'
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
FROM:
DAVID F. DIXON, CITY MANAGER
DATE:
APRIL 13, 1993
SUBJECT:
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB PROJECT
PREPARED BY:
SHAWN D. NELSON, COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR
MARY JANE MCLARNEY, FINANCE OFFICER
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors:
Consider request from the Boys and Girls Club to approve a loan of 951,000 for Phase
I Improvements of the Boys and Girls Club Project to be repaid with service-
programming hours at a rate of 91.05 per child per hour.
DISCUSSION: On March 22, 1993, the ad hoc co'mmittee for the Boys and
Girls Club Project met to review the current status of cost quotes for' design and
construction of this facility. Members of this committee include Pat Birdsall and Jeff
Stone from the City Council, representatives from the Board of Directors of the Boys
and Girls Club, and city staff. A recap of the total project costs including current
expenditures, proposed cost quotes from approved plans, and estimated costs for this
.project a[e as follows:
Current Exl~enditures
1. Modular buildings 9 31,000'
2. Moving buildings to site 11,400
3. Permit fees 4,348*
4. Design costs 15.652*
Total 9 62,400
* City has already provided funds for these expenditures totalling 951,000.
Phase I ImDrovernents
1. Geotechnical services $ 4,703
2. Surveyors 1,620
3. Rough Grading 5,000
4. Permit and water/sewer 28.002
connection fees
Phase
II Imorovements
Sub-Total $ 39,325
1. General construction 9252,466
2. Parking improvements 13,671
3. Landscaping improvements 10,000
4. Building permit fees 18,118
5. Landscaping plans 1,250
4. Misc. util!ty connections 5.000
Sub-Total 9300,505
Donated Fees. Services,
1. Rancho Water 9 3,248
2. Eastern Water 5,649
3. Landscaping 4,800
4. Structural Engineering 2, 116
5. Civil Engineering 2,531
6. Architecture 3,500
7. General Contractor 5.000
Sub-Total 9 26,8~.a.
Cash Contributions
1. Advanced Cardiovascular Systems 9 25,000'
(95,000 per year @ 5 years)
Sub-Total 9 25,000
Total Project Cost
less donated services
9429,074
26.8a.~.
Total Required Funds $402,230*
925,000 will be repaid in cash to the City once funds are received from ACS.
The Boys and Girls Club estimate that additional savings will be realized for this
project once construction is underway and therefore, no contingency amount has been
budgeted.
Further, in lieu of actual cash dollars for repayment of this loan, the Boys and Girls
Club has requested that the repayment be computed in service-programming hours at
an amount of $1.05 per child per hour. It is estimated that the Boys and Girls Club
would average 2,932 child hours per month which would be equivalent to a $3,078
monthly payment of principle and interest.
FISCAL IMPACT: Total required amount of funds for the Boys and Girls Club Project
is $402,230. The Boys and Girls Club is requesting to receive a loan of $51,000 for
Phase I improvements and reimbursement for moving the modular buildings to Pujol
Street to be repaid with service-programming hours at a rate of $1.05 per child per
hour.
ITEM
NO.
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY~
FINANCE OFFICE
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Council/City Manager
Harwood T. Edvalson, Assistant City Manager
April 13, 1993
ADDITION TO ANTI-GRAFFITI ORDINANCE
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council introduce an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 93-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADDING
SECTIONS 6.14.304 THROUGH 6.14.308, INCLUSIVE, TO CHAPTER 6.14 OF
THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO GRAFFITI.
BACKGROUND:
At its meeting of February 2, 1993, the City Council introduced an ordinance dealing with
graffiti removal and rewards for the successful conviction of graffiti-related vandalism. This
proposed ordinance will add two major elements to the existing ordinance, i.e., limited
commercial display of potential graffiti implements and penalties for possession of graffiti-type
implements.
As we have discussed before, the City of Los Angeles has successfully defended in court an
ordinance restricting consumer access to spray paint, markers, etc. The implements may be
displayed in an area viewable by but not accessible to the public without assistance.
This proposed ordinance makes vandals, or their custodial parents or guardians in the case of
minors, liable to the City for reimbursement of City funds expended to clean graffiti from
public or private property. The Finance Director is authorized to invoice the responsible
persons for the costs of abatement. This ordinance also includes language that defines graffiti
implements and makes it illegal to possess such implements without the express consent of
the property owner.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The introduction and adoption of this ordinance is anticipated to have little or no financial
impact on the City. The ordinance will have an impact on local merchants. Council may wish
to consider a phase-in period of three months for the "display" provision of the proposed
ordinance. This may reduce the immediate financial impact of compliance for the business
owner. This ordinance would normally become effective in thirty days.
ORDINANCE NO. 93-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ADDING SECTIONS 6.14,304 THROUGH 6.14.308, IN-
CLUSIVE, TO CHAPTER 6.14 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL
CODE RELATING TO GRAFFITI
WHEREAS, on March 23, 1993, the City Council of the City of Temecula adopted
Ordinance No. 93-03, pertaining to graffiti removal and establishing rewards for information
leading to the successful conviction of any person placing graffiti on public or private
property; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds and determines that it is appropriate to provide
regulations relating to the display for sale of aerosol paint containers and marking pens; and
WHEREAS, the City Council further finds and determines that penalties relating to
the possession of graffiti implements for the purpose of engaging in graffiti-making acts are a
suitable mechanism for the prevention of graffi~ within this City;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That new Section 6.14.304 is hereby added to Chapter 6.14 of the
Temecula Municipal Code to read as follows:
"6.14.304 DEF/NITIONS.
herein:
As used in this Chapter, the following terms shall have the meanings set forth
'Graf~ti': Any inscription, word, figure or design that is marked, etched,
scratched, drawn or painted on any surface, without the express permission of the owner (or
owner's representative) of such surface, regardless of the nature of the material of which the
surface is composed.
'Graf~ti Implement': Any implement capable of marking a surface to create
graffiti including, but not limited to, aerosol paint containers, paint sticks, felt-tip markers or
marking pens, marking instruments, drill bits, grinding stones, scribers, glass cutters, or
etching tools, or other implements capable of scarring glass, metal, concrete or wood.
'Aerosol Paint Container': Any container, regardless of the material from which it
is made, which is adapted or made for the purpose of spraying paint or other similar
substances capable of defacing property.
'Felt-tip Marker or Marking Pen': Any indelible marker or similar implement with a
tip which, at its broadest width, is greater than one-eighth inch, containing an ink.
'Paint Stick': A device containing a solid form of paint, wax, epoxy or other similar
substance capable of being applied to a surface by pressure and, upon application, leaving a
mark visible from a distance of twenty feet.
'Spray Actuator' (also known as a 'spray tip,' 'nozzle' or 'button'): An object
which is capable of being attached to an aerosol paint container for the purpose of spraying
the substance contained therein.
'Owner's Representative': Any person or entity expressly authorized by the owner
of any property to permit another person to place inscriptions, words, figures or designs
upon such property, or any person or entity in lawful possession of any property, whose
right of possession includes the authority to permit or allow inscriptions, words, figures or
designs to be placed upon such property."
Section 2. That new Section 6.14.305 is hereby added to Chapter 6.14 of the
Temecula Municipal Code to read as follows:
"6.14.305
RESPONSIBILITY FOR COST OF REMOVAL AND LAW
ENFORCEMENT SERVICES.
Whenever graf~ti has been removed from public or private property at the
expense of the City of Temecula, each person who placed any of the graf~ti, and the
custodial parents or guardians of any minor who placed any of the graf~ti, (hereinafter
collectively the "responsible persons") shall be legally responsible to reimburse the City of
Temecula for all costs for removal of such graf~ti as well as for the costs for law enforce-
ment services associated with the apprehension and prosecution of graffiti perpetrators.
Upon determination of the costs for removal and law enforcement services, the Finance
Director is hereby authorized and directed to invoice the aforesaid responsible persons for
such costs. Such costs shall be a debt jointly and severally owed to the City by such respon-
sible persons."
Section 3. That new Section 6.14.306 is hereby added to Chapter 6.14 of the
Temecula Municipal Code to read as follows:
"6.14.306 POSSESSION OF GRAFF1TI IMPLEMENTS PROHIBITED.
It shall be unlawful, and a misdemeanor, for any person to possess any graf~ti
implement, as defined in Section 6.14304 of this Chapter, for the purpose of defacing,
marking or damaging any public or private property, without the express consent of the
owner of such property or the owner's representative; provided, however; that nothing in this
Section shall be construed to permit or prohibit conduct which is prohibited by Penal Code
Section 594.1."
Section 4. That new Section 6.14.307 is hereby added to Chapter 6.14 of the
Temecula Municipal Code to read as follows:
"6.14.307 POSSESSION OF SPRAY ACTUATOR PROHIBITED.
It shall be unlawful, and a misdemeanor, for any person to. possess any spray
actuator, as defined in Section 6.14.304 of this Chapter, for the purpose of defacing,
marking or damaging any public or private property, without the express consent of the
owner of such property or the owner's representative."
Section 5. That new Section 6.14.308 is hereby added to Chapter 6.14 of the
Temecula Municipal Code to read as follows:
"6.14.308
STORAGE OR DISPLAY OF AEROSOL PAINT CONTAIN-
ERS AND MARKING PENS.
Every person who owns, conducts, operates or manages a retail commercial
establishment selling aerosol paint containers, or felt-tip marker or marking pens, shall store
or cause such containers or pens to be stored in an area viewable by, but not accessible to,
the public in the regular course of business without employee assistance, pending legal sale
or disposition of such containers or pens. It is the intent of this Section to permit, but not to
require, viewability of aerosol paint containers and felt-tip marker or marking pens while
they are stored or displayed pending retail sale."
Section 6. SEVERABILITY. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby
declares that should any section, paragraph, sentence or word of this Ordinance of the Code,
hereby adopted, be declared for any reason to be invalid, it is the intent of the Council that it
would have passed all other portions of this Ordinance independent of the elimination
herefrom of any such portion as may be declared invalid.
Section 7. EFFECTIVE DATE This ordinance shall be full force and effect thirty
(30 days) after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance
and cause copies of it to be posted and published as required by law.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOFrED, this
day of April, 1993.
J. Sal Mu~oz, Mayor
~ Ordl~18 ~
ATI'~T:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California do hereby certify
that the forgoing Ordinance No. 93--- was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading
at a regular meeting of the City Council on the __ day of , 1993, and that thereafter,
said Ordinance was. duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the
City of Temecula on the ... day of__, 1993 by the following roll call vote:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
ITEM 16
APPROVAL
'CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
PREPARED BY:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council
David F. Dixon, City Manager
Mary Jane McLarney, Finance Officer
April 13, 1993
Item No. 15 - Low Interest Loan/Business Incentive Program
City Clerk June S. Greek
RECOMMENDATION: It is staff's recommendation to continue this item to the
meeting of April 27, 1993.
JSG
ITEM
17
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEYR~
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
/~Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
April 13, 1993
Speed Undulations
PREPARED BY: James "Ben" Dobbins, Traffic Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
The Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommends that the City Council consider the adoption
of a policy governing the installation of speed undulations in residential neighborhoods in
Temecula.
BACKGROUND:
The City has received numerous requests for the installation of speed undulations in residential
areas. Speed undulations would be installed to reduce vehicular speeds and deter "short-cut"
routes through residential neighborhoods.
The Public/Traffic Safety Commission has reviewed studies of undulations used within other
jurisdictions and have determined that undulations could serve as a useful tool within the City.
Each location would be reviewed by the Commission and forwarded to the City Council for
final approval. Attached is the proposed Speed Undulation Policy and the Public/Traffic Safety
Commission's Agenda Report.
Typically, a speed 'undulation' is two (2) inches high by twelve (12) feet wide, which differs
from a speed 'bump', usually seen in parking lots, which is over four (4) inches high by one
(1) foot wide.
The Commission, with no opposition from the Police Department or Fire Department,
recommended that the City Council consider the attached Speed Undulation Policy for
adoption.
- 1 - pw01 ~agdrpt~,93\0413\undulate .spd 0401 ·
FISCAL IMPACT:
Each undulation construction cost --
Each undulation yearly maintenance cost --
$1,500.00
$300.00
Attachment:
1. Proposed Policy
2. Public/Traffic Safety Commission Agenda Report
3. City Attorney Letter Dated 11-28-90
-2- pw01~agdrpt\93~0413~undulate.spd 0401a
SPEED UNDULATION POLICY
Prior to the construction of a speed undulation, the subject street section shall meet the following
criteria:
A "speed undulation petition" signed by at least sixty percent (60%) of the affected residents
shall be filed with the City of Temecula Department of Public Works, Traffic Engineering
Division.
The average traffic shall range between 1,200 - 2,500 vehicles in a twenty-four (24) hour
period.
3. The speed limit shall be no greater than twenty-five (25) mph as determined by State law.
At least sixty percent |60%) of the surveyed vehicles are exceeding the twenty-five (25) mph
speed limit.
5. The subject street:
a. Shall not be over forty (40) feet wide, unless approved by City Engineer.
b. Shall not be more than two (2) traffic lanes.
Shall not have a grade greater than five percent (5%) in the section where humps are
to be constructed.
d. Shall be at least one quarter (~A) mile in length.
e. Shall not have severe vertical or horizontal alignment features.
f. Shall not be a truck route or transit route.
g. Shall not be an important access route for emergency vehicles.
h. Shall not be listed on the City Circulation Plan, unless approved by City Engineer.
The distance between undulations shall range between 200 - 250 feet.
Undulations shall not normally be constructed in isolated blocks along a continuous street or
on a relatively short ( < 800') cul-de-sac.
Undulations shall be constructed per the City of Temecula Standard Drawings.
Undulations are still experimental roadway features; therefore, additions, alternations or
removal of any hump may occur at any time.
p w01 \traffic\$pedhump.cri faul 021193
12" REFLECTIVE WHITE 12'
STRIPES ~ 6' O.C. -~ ~
/' I I
- {
W37AR .~ !,, A I
w61 51 I- 15o' . I
INSTALL SIGN AND POST
1' TAPER (TYP) -]
=B
I
J200'-250' SPACING
CONSTRUCT 12'
ASPHALT UNDULATION
I' 150'
, I
'l
~- W37AR
W6(151
6" TYP
ftfftffftff'
6'
2
CURB FACE
2' MAX TAPER
~ ~ (WIDTH 12"i/
' VARIES)
· .'~' .'. ':"d': ~
· ~,'..;.". ,,..,,
SECTION 'A-A'
REFLECTIVE WHITE ~ ' ""~I 7 "
PAVEMENT MARKING-+- E~, ~o
DETAIL
INSTALLATION DETAILS:
1. SPEED UNDULATIdNS SHALL NOT BE PLACED OVER
MANHOLES, WATERGATES, JUNCTION CHAMBERS, ETC.
2. EDGE OF SPEED UNDULATIONS SHALL BE 5 FEET
MINIMUM FROM EDGE OF DRIVEWAY.
3. WHENEVER POSSIBLE SPEED UNDULATIONS SHALL
BE PLACED AT PROPERTY LINES INSTEAD OF MID-LOT.
4. WHENEVER POSSIBLE SPEED UNDULATIONS SHALL
BE PLACED ADJACENT TO STREET LIGHTS.
5. LOCATION OF SPEED UNDULATIONS TO BE DETERMINED
BY CITY ENGINEER,
SECTION 'B-B'
A.C. STANDARD 3/8" MIX
TACK COAT
WARNING FLAGS
(FIRST WEEK)
/--30" X 30" W37R
WARNING SIGN
BLACK ON YELLOW
6" SERIES 'E' LETTERS
W6(15) SIGN
W6(15) SIGN
SIGN LOCATIONS: AS
DIRECTED BY CITY ENGINEER
APPROVED
CITY OF TEMECULA
STANDARD 2"
SPEED UNDULATION
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
AGENDA REPORT
Public/Traffic Safety Commission
Ben Dobbins, Traffic Engineer
March 25, 1993
Item 6
Speed Undulations
PREPARED BY:
Jim Faui, Engineering Technician
RECOMMENDATION:
At the Public/Traffic Safety Commission's request, Staff has prepared a report on speed
undulation installation and policies as a traffic control device on public residential streets.
BACKGROUND:
The City of Temecula has received numerous requests for the installation of speed undulations
in residential areas. Speed undulations would be installed to reduce vehicular speeds and
deter "short-cut" routes through residential neighborhoods.
Streets perform two (2) basic transportation functions: Provide access to individual parcels
of land and provide movement between various origins and destinations. Local residential
streets should be protected from excessive speeds (greater than 25 to 30 mph) and from
through traffic. Installing speed undulations, which are carefully designed features in the
pavement surface, is one method devised to accomplish the above objectives.
Many municipalities in California are currently using speed undulations and are listed below:
City of Campbell
City of Santa Rosa
City of Placentia
City of Brea
City of Paramount
City of Baldwin Park
City of Yorba Linda
City of Poway
City of Upland
City of National City
City of Simi Valley
City of Thousand Oaks
- 1 - pw01%traffic\commissn\agenda\93%0325 0315a
City of Claremont
City of El Monte
City of Redondo Beach
City of Laguna Beach
City of Sacramento
City of Agoura Hills
City of Manhattan Beach
City of Santa Monica
City of Costa Mesa
City of Newport Beach
City of Westminster
City of Camarillo
City of San Diego
City of Corona
City of Berkeley
City of Clovis
City of San Luis Obispo
City of Roseville
City of Chico
City of San Jose
City of Cupertino
City of Los Angles
County of Riverside
County of Ventura
City of Anaheim
City of Fullerton
City of Pasadena
On February 23, 1993, the Public/Traffic Safety Commission, along with Staff, field inspected
various speed undulations installed in the cities of Pasadena and Corona.
As previously mentioned, the positive effects of using speed undulations are:
-Vehicular Speed Reduction
Discouragement of "short-cut" through traffic
While the notable negative effects are:
Can be uncomfortable for those driving over the speed undulations
May divert traffic onto adjacent residential streets
May slow down response time for Fire and Emergency vehicles
Increased noise due to acceleration after speed undulation
Possible proliferation throughout City streets
Possible liabilities
Additional City maintenance cost
Many municipalities shy away from installing speed undulations due to the liability exposure.
The liability issue is raised due to current policy that all official traffic control devices are
regulated by the California Traffic Control Devices Committee through the California
Department of Transportation (CalTrans). Although speed undulations are not specifically
identified as an official traffic control device by CalTrans, they are used to influence or control
the route and speed of vehicles, therefore, they function as a traffic control device and should
be considered as such. While speed undulations are, by their function, a traffic control device,
they have not been approved for use by the California Traffic Control Devices Committee.
-2- pwO 1%traffic%comrnissn\agenda%93\0325 0315a
e
The City of Pasadena instructed staff that they have not had a liability situation since their
speed undulation program was adopted January 10, 1984.
To prevent the possibility of proliferation of speed undulation installation throughout City
streets, it is important to establish a clear and concise speed undulation policy. Staff
recommends the following policy:
SPEED UNDULATION POLICY
Prior to the construction of a speed undulation, the subject street section shall meet the
following criteria:
A "speed undulation petition" signed by at least sixty percent (60%) of the affected
residents shall be filed with the City of Temecula Department of Public Works, Traffic
Engineering Division.
The average traffic shall range between 1,200 - 2,500 vehicles in a twenty-four (24)
hour period.
The speed limit shall be no greater than twenty-five (25) mph as determined by State
law.
At least sixty percent (60%) of the surveyed vehicles are exceeding the twenty-five
(25) mph speed limit.
5. The subject street:
a. Shall not be over forty (40) feet wide, unless approved by City Engineer.
b. Shall not be more than two (2) traffic lanes.
Shall not have a grade greater than five percent (5%) in the section where
undulations are to be constructed.
d. Shall be at least one quarter (~A) mile in length.
e. Shall not have severe vertical or horizontal alignment features.
f. Shall not be a truck route or transit route.
g. Shall not be an important access route for emergency vehicles,
Shall not be listed on the City Circulation Plan, unless approved by City
Engineer.
The distance between undulations shall range between 200 - 250 feet.
Undulations shall not normally be constructed in isolated blocks along a continuous
street or on a relatively short (< 800') cul-de-sac.
-3- PwO1%traffic%commissn\agendat,93~0325 0315a
e
Undulations shall be constructed per the City of Temecula Standard Drawing.
Undulations are still experimental roadway features; therefore, additions, alternations
or removal of any undulation may occur at any time.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The City of Thousand Oaks reported that the shape, height, and spacing of the speed
undulations were of great importance· In order to maintain an acceptable level of quality
control, a group of templates had to be made to use as a screed. The asphalt concrete had
to be laid in multiple lifts (layers) and a survey crew followed to assure that the desired height
and shape were achieved. Advance signs and pavement markings were then installed and the
speed undulation was striped to increase its visual impact to the driver. A cost estimate for
construction and maintenance of speed undulations follows:
Installation:
Speed Undulation Construction
91,000.00
Signing and Striping
9500.00
TOTAL
(each) 91,500.00
Maintenance: (yearly)
Asphalt Concrete Pavement
9100.00
Signing and Striping
$200.00
TOTAL
(each) 9300.00
CONCLUSION:
Studies have shown that speed unulations have a significant impact on traffic. Humps are
effective in reducing speeds, but the impacts on deterring through traffic vary by location.
Responses from various municipalities indicate that the Fire & Emergency Services is most
effected by the installation of speed undulations. An experimental pilot program could be
installed and evaluated after one (1) year to determine future use of speed undulations·
ATTACHMENTS:
City of Pasadena Policies and Procedures for the installation of speed humps and
standard drawing. o
City of Camarillo Resolution No. 85-24 pertaining to procedures governing the
construction of speed humps.
pwO1\traffic~commisen~agende~,93~0325 0315
POLICIES FOR TME INSTALLATION OF SPEED HUMPS
(Amended 11/25/85)
Soeed humus are an auorcuriate mechanism-for'reduei~u 'speeds on
cer=ai'n streets in Pasadena when urouer!v installed under the riuht
circumstances.
Sueed humus can be considered for installation when the benefits
nor~..a!lv derived bv residents from a local residential street are
siunificantlv diminished bv the speed of traffic (even thouan there
have been few or no reported accidents) -as evidence ibv a
substantial ma~o. ritv.of the abuttina residents sianina aDetition
for the installation of speed hu~Ds..
SPeed humus should only be used on local residential streets (i.e.,
streets where the urimarv function is to urovide access to abuttina
residences]. Experience has shown that the average motorist
reduces speed to approximately 16 MPH to traverse a 3-inch speed
hump. it would no~ be realistic to'expec~ motorists on s~ree~s
intended. to serve more than just abutting residents to reduce
speeds to 16 MPH every 300 feet or so. Such installations would
inevitably lead to extreme driver frustration and substantial
negative public reaction to the concept of using speed humps. for
.speed control, even at locations where they are clearly
appropriate. Installation of speed humps on streets other than
local residential streets could have potentially severe traffic
safe~y consequences, almost certainly affect emergency services and
other service delivery activities, and likely create the diversion
of large amounts of through traffic onto local residential streets
which were not intended for that putpose.
The ma'jority of street mileage in Pasadena can clearly be
classified as local residential streets. However, speed humps will
non normally be considered for streets which are classified as
collector streeEs or higher in the City's General Plan or which are
determined to provide a transportation service to the community
beyond than of Simply providing access to the immediately abutting
residents. There are no.absolute criteria that.clearly distin-
guishes a purely. local residential street from other relatively
low-volume streets that provide important services to residents in
addition to those immediately abutting the street in question.
However, streets carrying less than 1,000 vehicles per day are
almos~ always local residential street and streets carrying over
3,000 vehicles per day almost always provide important services to
the larger community. In the final analysis, the suitabi!itv of a
particular street for the installation of speed humps. will h~ve to
be determined on a case-by-case basis.
Speed humus should be- installed on louical seaments of local
residential streets. They will not normally be installed in
isolated blocks alone a continuous street or on relatively short
(less than 800 feetl cul-de-sac streets. A subs~annial majority of
9.
10.
!i.
residents on logical continuous segments of a local residential
s~ree~ must support the ins=al!ation of speed humps. Logical
segments are considered to be segments between arterial streets or
between natural discontinuities such as jogs in the ~treet. The
cosn of installing speed humps on relatively short cud-~e-sac
streets cannot normally be justified.
Streets e!iaible for the installation of sueed humus shall have a
sueed limit of 25 MPH as determined in accordance with StaTe Law.
The need to reduce speed substantially at speed humps would not
make these. devices appropriate for-streets posted higher than 25
MPH because of the'severe'speed,differential such'as instaliation.
would create'along the street. Severe differentials.. between the
speed of vehicles on a stree~ are known to contribute to traffic
accidents.
The street shall'be no more than one lane in each direction.
The street'should not be a truck route or a transit route·
The street should not have arades areater than 5%. Proposed
policies 5, 6, 7, and 8 are identical to recommendations'.
made bythe California Traffic Control devices Committee
on Pavement Undulations and are based on the bes~
information currently available.
Sueed humus wi'll only be considered for installation on local
residential streets determined by the Public Works Department to
have adecuate vertical and horizontal alignment and siuht distances
to safe!v accommodate the installation of speed humus.
The street should not be an imuortant access route.for emeraencv
venic!es. Factors ~o be considered are:
(a) ~'ihether the street is a primary route for emergency vehicles;
Whether the installation' of speed humps could cause a
significant delay in the response to emergencies.
Speed humus are still exuerimental roadway features'; therefore,
additions, alterazions, or removal of any or all speed humus may
occur a~'anv time.
Adopted by Pasadena Board of Directors, January !0, 1984.
Amended by Pasadena Board of Directors, November 12, 1985.
PROCEDURES FOR THE INSTALLATION OF SPEED HUMPS FY !989-90
(Amended 2/14/89)
The Board's adopted policies and procedures for the
installation of speed humps will be made available to all
interested parties.
A representative o~ ~ local residential street who
believes the residents on his' street will' suppor~ the
installation. l of speed humps will submit a request in.'l'
writing to the Traffic and Transportation Engineering
Section which will consult with the Police and Fire
Departments in making a determination of whether the
street in question is eligible for further consideration
for the installation of speed humps (i.e., the street is
c~nsistent with the Board's policies for ~he instal!aticn
of speed humps).
Upon determination that a street is not eligible for
speed-.humps, the representative(s) of the street will be
notified in writing giving the reason why the street is
not eligible. The representative(s) of the street will
be given 15 days to appeal the decision in writing =5 the
Traffic and Transportation Engineer. A report of those
streets determined to be ineligible will be sent to the
City Manager for distribution to the Board· Staff will
review the original determination of streets which are
appealed· If staff concludes their original decision is
still valid, staff will present the appeal to the Board
of Directors' for 'final determination if representatives
of the street wish the matter to be referred to the
Board.
Upon determination that a street is eligible for fur, her
consideration, the representative of the street will be
advised to submit a petition (forms provided by the City)
'from the abutting property owners or'residents indicating
that a clear majority (65% or more) support the installa-
tion of speed humps on =heir street. The petition forms
provided by the City will state: If there is subsequently
a desire by residents to remove the speed humps, the
humps will only be considered for removal after recei~:
of a petition from a substantial majority (65% or more)
asking for the removal along with sufficient funds for
the removal up to $700 per hump.
The soonsot of the merition is recuired to contact every
resident of the abuttinu properties on the subject
street. If'a resident is aceins= the sueed humus. the
word "OPPOSED" will be noted on the merition si~na=ure
suace. If the soonsot is unable to contact a resident.
A-3
"NO CONTACT" will be noted on the 6etition 'sicnature
soace with the days and times that ccntac~ was attemuzed.
It is rec~/ired that the sponsor make m~-. l~as= two
aZ~emu=s on semara~e davs ~o con=ac~ a resident.
Any meritions submitted prior to'eliCibilitv determina-
tion by City staff will not be nrocessed ahead of
schedule and shall be subiect to rejection if all
recuired information on the ins~al!ation of smeed humus
is not included thereon.
To be 'considered for the progrim, petitions.'must be
received by the Traffic and Transportation Engineering
Section by .
Upon verification of the petition, staff will make very
reasonable effort to notify the surrounding area of
proposal for speed humps on a particular street. Such
notification may include information in City publications
(IN FOCUS), and neighborhood newsletters, when available,
and in some instances, special signs posted on the
street. If there is substantial opposition to the
installation of speed humps by people who travel the
street on a regular basis the Traffic and Transporzation
Engineer will consult 'with. the various parties and
attempt to reach consensus. If agreement cannot be'
reached on a particular street, the matter will be
referred to the Board of Directors for final
determination.
Upon verification of the petition, the Traffic and
Transportation Engineering Section will make traffic
speed and volume measurements and review the traffic
accident history for. the street in question. In
addition, the Traffic and Transportation Engineering
Setzion .will submit thelist of requests to the Police
and Fire Departments for their comments. .-
'In the event the number '0f requests for speed humps
exceeds the funds available, the Traffic and
Transpor%~ation Engineering Section will rank the'requests
in a recommended order of priority and submit these
recommendations to the Board of Directors for approval.
The priority list recommended for approval will be based
on traffic accidents, speeds, traffic volumes, and
comments of the Police and Fire Departments. The Traffic
and Transportation Engineer will set formal the basis fo~
the recommended priorities in a report accompanying ~e
priority list.
Unless there is an overriding consideration such as high
incidence of speed-related accidents (a rare condition on
most local residential streets), priorities will normally
be established by multiplying the percentage of motorists
A-4
exceeding 25 MPH by the 24-hour traffic volume of the
szreet in question. A street yielding the' highest
numerical value resulting from the abovecomput~ion will
be considered to have the highest priority for speed
humps. Depending upon the number of.petitions received
and the types of streets involved, it is possible that a
"cut-off speed" (perhaps an 85th percentlie speed of 30
MPH) will be established below which streets will no= be
considered for ~he program.
.The physical installation of -speed' hUmps. and the
.ass. ociated traffic control devices shall conform to
design standards established by the Public 'Works and
Transportation Department.
AdopTed by Pasadena Board of Directions, January 10, 1984.
.~mended by Pasadena Board of Directors, March 30, 1987.
A~nended by Pasadena Board of Directors, February 14, 1989.
A-5
W~SRBAS, the. City oZ CamsrileD has received
numerous. requests for eke construction of s~osd humps in
rmsldsnCia% ere&s1 and
;~lSlt~Xl, the City o~ C~aril~o hal adopted a
General ?lea which contains a Cir~ls~ion :le~n~ designed
problem o~ excessive vehi~ula~ ~:a~/c in residential areeel
and
~EXZ~, ~he prHodurms established by this
~IHEi4~A8, the City of Cs~mrillo hem the authority
to construct speed humps II part cf ice powers to centtruce
and maintain'l~ceetsf and
the City o~ Cameralie, in order
pceven~ the prolifmraCion o: speed &~umpe, desires Co Limit
their conmtruccion to rheas legations which are supported
local residents and which demonstrate the potential for
mefecClve speed reduecionf
OF THE CZTr Or CANAR~LLO AS I~LLOWSI
Section 1. Policies,
The lni~iagion of requests for speed hump construe-
clans shall ~e in accordance with the fol3.ov/q prccedu:es~
(a) fJ.~ requests shall originate from the reaLdenim
the street,
(b} )~Z requests shaZl
residents deal:Leg the construction of.speed h~naps on the
.lUD~eCt l~reet, Copies of maid petition shm~L be eMp~ied
~y the Engineering Services Department.
(c) All petitions shmlZ be circulated
residents themselves,
{d) A aspsrats petition sha%~ be used for each
(e) Petitions shall be ciFcu/atsd at a minimum
among those residence reeldin; in buiZdLnSs ~ecing the
street and located vi~hin 75 feet of the glee o~ curb on the
st:ee:,
(f) C~mp%eCsd petit/one shell be de%ivs:ed
tom Director O~ engineering bowLcam, 6O~ Ca:men Drive,
Camarl~=, California
(g) ZacA 'Petition of AZ~irmation'
the signatures cZ residents representing at ~eas~ siXty ':.
percent (60t} oZ ~hu ~si~on~ol {sx~nf c~urches ~nd
~oGlted ~iChin 78 fee~ o[ ~e ~urb on the s~rea~.
(h) . :n Ca, evon~ ~het s portion o~ the sffe~Ced
Street is ereaged by i~rtnnt ~ul~di~s I~/o: ohur,hes,
~ho ~ner,, mm~Vers m~/o: ~,nsnn oZ sm nay mu~l~
Sngineeti~ is,ices requesting that speed humps no~ be
installed on t~ street.
within 75 ~ooC O~ ~hl Curb on the
(3) The De slant o; E~neetL~ Services
mhlZ~ place notices on eiGC lush bu/~di~ advising
this
SecCiDn' 2. Warsanti.
The cDnsCruc~ion DE speed h~pe on pubZl= raids
shall be considered only te s11 the Eelloving oo~i~ionm
mac over khs entire proposed l~:ee~ s~mng ms dete~ined by
the DirleCor of gnginel:~ng laWJOel
(l) :he average traffic voZu~ exoe~e 2,500
vehicles iA I 24 hour
(~) Rare thin ei;h~y-ilven ~rcen~
the au~eyed motorists exce~ s a~ed
Co) The road Ls nag over 40 {ee~ in width.
(d) The raid has s speed limi~
in accordance with S~ste ZIw or Ci~
(J) The .road i8 either i rel/de~lal road or
I Xoca~ road as ~e~$ned ~n the ~nmra~
(g) The approach speeds a: the lees%ion or
t~e ~trs~ potential speed hump must be able to be s~fectively
con~Co~le~ vls a physical design ~estMre to the sstil~scclon
of tam Director e[ Engineering Services,
Section 3, Procedures.
Adoption o~ a request ~or tpesd hump constructions
shall ha in accordance vi~h the £ollovi.ng psooeduresz
Ca) After each petition is received~ the Direstar
o~ Engineering 8cruises shells
el) verify chac each petition contains
requisite number o~ signatures.
(2) ODetin necessary trafel~ data.
. (3) Verify raspllanos with all vatrents
apeci~led in Section 2 f ~his Kesoluticn, o
(4) Sneer t~e ~raffia da~a on a el;wed
Hump Friori~i·a~ion Form· go calculate & relative sPrigcity
~ndex." for ®ash l~ree~,
(5) ReqUest the Venteta County SheclZZ'e
Department to schedule selectiv· ·peed enforcement on
slid street at a level relative to t~e ~rior~gy Zndex eor
each street,
(b) All requests far speed ~umps ~hat meet
a~l po 'ties and vartant~a aS specified in Section· I and 2
o~ this Xe·o2ution lha~l be ~aken before.the Streets and
Highways Commiteli. ?he Ceemit~ee shall £orvird a rec=emea-
dat~on to ~onstruot or not to ~on·truct speed hump· t0 the
City Council ~or action,
(c) The application lhaA~ he prelentld Co the
CLay Counci~ vie a io~mll public hearing. The CLay Council
shall decide 1£ the requests4 speed humpe Ihould be constructed,
(d) Prior ~o CAd City Connell hearing, the City
lerk shall prepare · notins of ·aid hearing inviting
neereSted individuals to appear and enter into relevant die-
cession·. These ~oCicel shill be mailed to all hmea along
She aub'sc~ aCre·el they ·hall be posted along the eu~eo~ etree~f
at all ~ntersec~ing street·, and along all significant diver·ion
streets~ and a special paid sdvertieemeng shall be placed in ·
newspaper of general circulation.
Section ~. Design.
El;fled humps sha~l he constructed in
with desiOn guidelines that hive =sin llti~ZiShod by
Director o~ gngineerin~ 8ervAcee at the time oJ installation.
Sec~io, 5. Addlelone, Alteratlone and Rem9vals.
~di~ions,.alCera~i~ns =r :em9vals c~ any oc
all speed humpa may occur at any time.
section ~.
Af~er'~he construction of speed hump· On each
new I~ree~, ~he-DirecCor o~/nOineerinO Sluices lhal~
no~i~y'Che Ven~uta County FIre Department,
County Sheti~f:s ~pe~ment I~d P~ner bbulince Sewice
· aid construct/on whets they ~ incur
~P~tD ~D ADO~/~ this ~ day of Flb~a~
ATTSET |
VE:NTURA COUNTY OFFICE:
2310 PONDE:ROSA
SUITE:
CAlelARILL0, CALIFORNIA 93010
(805) 987-3468
TE:I-E:C01elE:R: ISOS) 452-9834
LAW OFIrlCrS
BTJ~., WZT-T-IA~S & SORENSE~
3200 BRISTOL STRE:E:T
SUITE: 640
COc:TA MESA. CALIFORNIA 92626
(714) S45-5559
LOS ANGE:LE:S OFFICE:
ONE: WILSHIFIE: SUIL01NG
624 SOUTH GRAND AVE:NUE:, IIl'N FLOOR
LOS ANGE:LSS, CALIFORNIA 90017
[Z13) Z38-0600
TO:
Honorable Chairman Knox Johnson and
Members of ~he Traffic Safety Commission
FROM: John E. Cavanaugh, Deputy City Attorney
DATE:
November 28, 1990
SUBJECT: Pavement Undulations and Traffic Diverters
BACKGROUND:
The City Attorney has been requested for an opinion
relative to the legality of pavement undulation, i.e.,
"speed bumps," and traffic diverters, as well as the
potential impact such devices would have on City liability.
OUESTIONS PRESENTED:
Are "speed bumps" and/or traffic diverters legal
under' existing State law?
If speed 'bumps and/or traffic diverters are legal,
what impact, if any, would placement of these
devices on city streets have on City liability
should accidents or injuries result therefrom?
SUMMARY CONCLUSIONS:
Statutory law does not expressly provide for or
prohibit the use of either speed bumps or traffic
diverters, however, if such devices are considered
"traffic control devices" the City's authority to
use them is preemptedbyState law.
Potential liability arising out of the use of speed
bumps and/or traffic diverters appears to outweigh
the potential benefits.
-1-
DISCUSSION:
OUESTION I - LEGAL AUTHORITY.
Section 440 of the California Vehicle Code defines
"official traffic control device" as:
. . .any sign, signal, marking or device,
consistent with Section 21400, placed or
erected by authority of a public body or
official having jurisdiction, for the
purpose of regnlating, warning, or
guiding traffic, but does not include
islands, ~urbs, traffic barriers, or
other roadway design features.
There is some question as to whether speed bumps and other
similar devices fall within the above definition. However,
it is not clear that such devices do not constitute traffic
barriers or roadway design features, and therefore fall
within the exception provided in the definition. The
California Traffic Control Devices Committee has apparently
taken no formal action with respect to the classification of
speed bumps.
If speed bumps are properly considered "traffic
control devices", then the City has no legal authority to
place speed bumps on the public streets and/or highways.
Section 21401 of the Vehicle Code provides that only those
traffic control devices which conform to the uniform
standards and specifications promulgated bythe Department
of Transportation may be placed upon a street or highway.
To date, the Department of Transportation has not
promulgated any uniform standards or specifications for
speed bumps.
OUESTION 2 - POTENTIAT. LIABTT.TTY.
Section 830.6 of the Government Code provides that
a public entity is not liable for injury caused by the plan
or design of the construction of any improvement to public
property when those plans or designs are approved in advance
or prepared in conformity with standards previously
approved. In order to avail itself to the immunity provided
by this Section, the governmental entity should plan or
design the improvement to conform with reasonable and safe
standards -- i.e., uniform standards. Without such
standards to base its design decision upon, the City would
not be covered by the immunity provided by Section 830.6,
and therefore risks substantial liability in the event of an
accident and subsequent suit.
The placement of obstructions on public streets,
such as speed bumps or traffic diverters, would not conform
to standards considered reasonable and safe. Furthermore,
such obstructions may create a hazardous condition even to
those who drive at normal speeds, and may expose the City to
considerable potential liability for injury and property
damage. In January 1975, the City of San Jose considered
the precise question now being considered by this
Commission..San Jose staff recommended rejection of speed
bumps noting that:
. .1. SPeed bumps are not effective in reducina speeds.
For most vehicles, the faster you go over the speed
bump, the more comfortable the ride and the less
noticeable the bump. Far from reducing speeds,
speed bumps would therefore cause drivers to speed
up to. minimize discomfort and shock.
2. Speed bumps are potentially extremely hazardous.
particularly for b~cvcles. motorcycles. and
f~re~ighters on'f{re trucks. While all of the
bumps [in the City's study] were rated as an
extreme hazard to the unsuspecting bicyclist, one
bump bent the steel rim of the test bicycle's front
wheel, and would have caused an accident if the
rider had not been properly prepared. In the
motorcycle tests, a highly-trained motorcycle
officer was launched 16 feet in the air and
narrowly escaped an accident when he almost bounced
over the handlebars from the impact.
-3-
In the lower speed tests of the fire truck, the
firefighters on the rear of the truck were launched
from one foot to a foot-and-a-half in the air. It
was their opinion that if they had not been
prepared for the bump because it was a test
situation, they probably would have been thrown to
the street. It should be underscored that these
are only obvious hazards and that in our opinion,
other vehicles were probably experiencing
significant damage to the steering mechanisms,
wheels, shocks, etc., that we could not measure. . .
The City's potential exposure to liability for
placement of speed bumps and other similar traffic diversion
devices on City streets far outweighs the limited benefit
provided by them. There may be other mechanisms available
to control speed on residential streets which do not carry
with them the concurrent liability exposure.
I hope this information is helpful to the
Commission. Please feel free to contact me should you have
any additional questions in this matter.
jec/MEM18344:slb
Respectfully submitted,
C'~y of Temecula
ce:
Tim Serlet, City Engineer
City of Temecula
Mark Greenwood
TEMECULA COMMUNITY
SERVICES DISTRICT
AGENDA
ITEM
NO.
1
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
HELD MARCH 23, 1.993
A regular meeting of the Temecula Community Services District was called to order at 11:00
PRESENT: 5 DIRECTORS: Parks, Mu~oz, Roberts, Stone,
Birdsall
PM.
ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None
Also present were City Manager David F. Dixon, City Attorney Scott F. Field and June S.
Greek, City Clerk.
It was moved by Director Mu~oz, seconded by Director Parks to extend the meeting until
11:30 PM. The motion carried with Director Stone in opposition.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None given.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Director Stone requested that Consent Calendar Item No. 4 be removed from the Consent
Calendar.
Director Mu~oz asked the following questions regarding Consent Calendar Item No. 2:
Award of Professional Services Contract for Materials Testinq and Establish a Proiect
EmPloyee Position for the Project Coordinator for the Community Recreation Center.
project No. 92-029B
Director Mu~oz asked if the recommended consultant, Steve Ford, has a conflict of
interest since he is serving as a City Planning Commissioner. 'City Attorney Field
stated that Mr. Ford will not have a conflict of interest, because the Planning
Commission has not been involved in this project and it is proposed that Mr. Ford be
hired as an independent contractor, not as an employee.
Director Mu~oz asked how many people were interviewed for this position. Director
of Community Services Shawn Nelson stated that six interviews we conducted, three
firms and three individuals, and costs associated for firms as well as individuals were
analyzed. He reported that hiring an individual consultant appears to be the most cost-
effective approach for the City in dealing with construction coordination services.
It was moved by Director Stone, seconded by Director Parks to approve Consent
Calendar Items 1-3.
""" Minutes/032393 -1 - 04105193
CSD Minutes
The motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5
NOES: 0
ABSENT:
March 23. 1993
DIRECTORS: Mu~oz, Parks, Roberrs, Stone, Birdsall
DIRECTORS: None
0 DIRECTORS: None
Minutes
1.1
Approve the minutes of March 9, 1993.
m
Award of Professional Services Contract for Materials Testing and Establish a Project
Emolovee Position for the Proiect Coordinator for the Community Recreation Center,
Project No. 02-029B
2.1
Award a Professional Services Contract to Professional Services
Industries, Inc. to provide material testing. services during the
construction of the Community Recreation Center, Project No. 92-029B,
in the amount of $11,925 and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to
execute the contracts;
2.2
Award a Professional Services Contract to Steve Ford to provide
professional services as the Project Coordinator during the construction
of the Community Recreation Center, Project No. 92-029B in an amount
not to exceed $52,800 and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to
execute the contract subject to the approval of the Principal Engineer
and the City Attorney.
Replacement of Landscaoe Bonds for Slooe Imorovements - The Preslev Comoanies
3.1
Authorize the replacement of landscape bonds for slope improvements
to Tracts 23267-2, -3, -04, -5 and Tract 26861 The Presley
Companies.
4. Contract for Julv 4th. 1993 Fireworks Show
Director Stone asked if other companies had submitted bids. Director of Community
Services Shawn Nelson reported this is the only company which coordinates fireworks
along with a musical program.
Director Parks asked if this includes fees for police services. Mr. Nelson stated there
will be no additional fees.
Minutes1032393 -2- 04105193
CSD Minutes
March 23. 1993
It was moved by Director Roberrs, seconded by Director Stone to approve staff
recommendation.
4.1
Award the contract to Robert Caran Productions to produce the City of
Temecula's 1993 July 4th Fireworks Show;
4.2
Appropriate $17,000 from unreserved TCSD fund balance to Account '
No. 190-180-999-5250.
The motion was unanimously carried.
DISTRICT BUSINESS
5. Naminq of Park Site on Pala Road
Director of Community Services Shawn Nelson presented the staff report.
Director Parks asked if the Pechanga Reservation had any objections to the City
naming the park, Pechanga Park. Mr. Nelson stated he would. be happy to make the
necessary inquiry.
It was moved by Director Parks, seconded by Director Stone to continue this item until
approval had been obtained from the Tribal Council of the Pechanga Indian
Reservation.
Director Mu~oz requested that the motion be amended to approve the name Pechanga
Park subject to staff obtaining concurrence of the Tribal Council of the Pechanga
Indians that this is acceptable to the tribe.
Director Parks amended his motion and Director Stone amended his second.
The motion was unanimously carried.
GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT
None given.
COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR REPORT
None given.
CITY ATTORNEY REPORT
None given.
Minutes/032393
04105193
CSD Minutes March 23, 1993
DIRECTORS REPORTS
President Birdsall announced she artended the National League of Cities Meeting in
Washington D.C., as a member of the Policy Committee for Human Development, and
reported a great deal of support shown for legislation in the Community Services area.
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Director Parks, seconded by Director Mu~oz to adjourn at 11:20 PM. The
motion was unanimously carried.
Patricia H. Birdsall, President
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk/TCSD Secretary
Minutes1032393 -4- 04105193 '~/
ITEM
NO.
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
Board of Directors/General Manager
FROM:
Scott F. Field, City Attorney
DATE: April13,1993
SUBJECT:
Construction of 115 Kv Transmission Line by Southern California Edison Along
Margarita Road
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors grant Southern California Edison an
anchor easement located at the northwest corner of Margarita Road and Pauba Road within
Sports Park, in exchange for the release of an adjacent anchor easement to the City.
DISCUSSION: Southern California Edison is constructing an above ground 115 Kv
electrical transmission line along Margarita Road. Edison presently owns a four foot (4') by
twenty-five foot (25') strip at the northwest corner of Pauba and Margarita within the Sports
Park. It would like to exchange its current easement for a new easement, which setback to
reflect the ultimate right-of-way. In exchange for the new easement, it is offering to pay the
City three-hundred-fifty dollars (~350.00). Following additional negotiations, Edison has
agreed to add to the new easement a one-time relocation provision. That is, should the City
ever widen Margarita further, Edison would relocate the transmission line to a new City
provided site without charge to the City.
It is recommended that the City Council approve the grant of the new easement. (It should
be noted that the attached agreement only authorizes a new easement. After Edison prepares
the appropriate legal description, the actual easement will be prepared and signed by the
Mayor.)
FISCAL IMPACT: The City will receive payment for the new easement of three-
hundred-fifty dollars ($350.00). Although no appraisal has been done, this price of two
dollars and 92 cents ($2.92) per square foot appears fair, particularly in light of the one-time
relocation provision.
ATTACHMENTS:
Existing anchor easement granted in 1972.
Letter from Edison, dated 10/28/92 enclosing existing easement.
Letter from Edison, dated 12/7/92 enclosing existing easement.
Agnrl:plodilon
-1-
%...
City of Temecula Community Service District
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
Octot~er 28, 1992
A'R'ENT1ON: Mr. Shawn Nelson
DireCtor of Community Services
Dear Mr, Nelson:
8U~dECT:
Mor~ga-Pechanga & Pauba-Pechariga 115kV TIL
Job Order No, 8048
Demand for electricity is continuing to grow within the service territory of 8outhem
Califomla Edison Company. In order Io accommodate this growth and continue to provide
the level of service that Edison cLammrs are entlded, it Is neeessw), to acquire rights
of wW to construct lransmlssion lines Io bear serve the area.
The existing pole fine affecting your properly as shown on the enclosed plat maps is
currently scheduled for relocation. The location of these fac~itles wlg be entirely
within the future street dght of way as proposed by the County of RIverside Road Master
Pans. The wood poles will be paced behind the cud} of me street right of way.
Southern california Edison Company respactfu~y requests your consideration in
granting an anchor easement for the Installation of the reloC~ted facilitles as shown on
the enclosed drawin0, [f you are In agreement, please sign Ihe enclosed Letter of
Agreement and return it to me in the envelope provided.
Payment for the easement will be $350.00, Upon receipt of Ihe signed document, a
partial payment of $100,00 will be forwarded to you. The balance will be paid after the
easement has been filed in the County Recorder's Office.
Please call me at (7.14} 395-3331 If you have any quasiions regarding this matter.
Thank you for your cooperation.
Sincerely,
Real Proparties Agent
DMF-,/ASE ,
Enclosures
CB:rTIRED MAIL-RETURN RECEIFT REQUESTED
SOUTHERN CAUFORNIA EDI~0N COMPANY
430 N. Vineyard Avenue, Sure 210, Onteio, CA 91764
Confirming our u~ng, I~ is ur~ie.~,t~;od anci agreed that you will grant ta the
As shown in yellow on the attached Plat ma;~.
Nfeets Riverside County Aeaessofs Paz~el No. 945-050-{x)7.
Edison will pay $35o as payment for the purchase of said easement. ($100 as parlfal
As soon as me correct des~iption ~.n be wrtlten, an easement will be prepared and delivered
to you for execution.
it b undersbx~ and agreed that it ~ be n to commence mrmtrudlon uPOn_'
mp etion of the ~naJ su_ryeys, p~.r to the time th~;a~ement earl be and presented
Job Order No.: 8048
SIncerely,
B~:r. UTHE/~DAN4'~Ki=~ISON
COMPANY
I (We) hereby approve, accept and agree to the terms, covenants, and conchions herelnabove
set forth, and agree to execul~ the above-mentioned easement in Ihe form referred to:
CITY OF TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICE
Dated.-._
Dated:
Southern Ca//forn/a Edison Company
SUITE 210
430 NORTH VINEYARD AVENUE
(:)hr'rARIO, C/4,1FORN IA 91784-5495
EASTERN REQK31~I
LAND SERVICES
REAL PROPERTIES AhlC ADIMIINI~T"RATIVE SERVICE8
TELEPI..K)NE
FAX (714) 395-3345
Mr. Scott Field
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula CA 92590
December 7, 1992
Dear Mr, Field:
SUBJECT:
Proposed Moraga-Pechanga 115 kV Transmission Line
Request for Edison Anchor Easement
Northeast Comer of Margarita Road and Pauba Road
Per our telephone conversation, I am enclosing, for your review, a copy of the Grant of
Easement from Kaiser Aetna by which Edison is claiming prior dghts to the existing anchor at
the above location. The location is defined by "Strip No. 22" on the easement, marked in yellow.
As mentioned in our initial letter of 28 October 1992, Edison will be constructing a pole line
along Margarita Road and will require an easement for an anchor (4'x30') to support the pole at
the subject intersection.
The easement. will be totally within private property and not within Margarita Road right of way
which has a current width of 110 feet, The new location will be approximately 10 feet
northwesterly of its existing location to accommodate the future properly corner cut-back if
and when the property is developed in the future, The existing anchor easement will be
quitclaimed upon the recordation of the new easement.
I have requested a drawing from Edison's mapping section to show the-relationship of the two
locations. The drawing will be forwarded to you as soon as it has been completed. Also the
location has been staked in the field.
Please review the enclosed information and, if acceptable, please have the previously sent
"short-form" signed by an authorized representative of the City and forwarded to me at the
above address.
Should you have any questions or wish to arrange a field meeting, please contact me at (909)
395-3331.
DM
REAL PROPERTIES CONSULTANT
,,..,i=t,, ..~;..~ ,; ~; ;~;;'i;;~';'FiT'~;;i;;; ' ": ..........................
~;,;'i" ';"~iia~"' ~i'g:~;ak~X' '~'~'S
CO~IPA~'¥. a ~rlN,ral~n' it, ~c~ and as~i~s. {he~fler ~(e~ l; a, 'Ganl~'~, an
and right td way t,, c~struct. u~, maintai~ o~mte, titif, add to, re~ir, ~dace, rectmst~ct,
rmove at an~' lime and (rm llme to lime o~head and Mnde~ eJ~tHeal su~dy
municatitm s~stem~ (hereiafter referM Io as ',)'~tems'), ctmsislin o( x
wlre~. underground ctmdu ', -}l,bs ~ult manh I g I ~, ~ys and agc~,,
el~l energy and h~r trautmhtin~ intelhtenCe by el~lrkal maas, i~. ~m. m'~r, u~er, aca a~ alon~
FO~ DZSCKIFTXOIIj, S~Z ATTACHZD Z}OIIBXT "A*' .
Grant,,r(~, aCretill Ior thrmsrh-rs. (h .... &till. there Ih -) heirs and assj ns not Io creel
~ delcv/b~d~lm~C
~ ,s ~ ,'.,, i,r,,r h, sut'h excavalion as is I,raclicahlel~ . ~ouml to as near
2~;:~:;;;;' ~"~" '~""'."'- --" - ,-,.,,.-, ,, ~; L:;'~Z{,,~" '"' """',, ~-.,,,, -,..-,,
'~" '~ ' ;~' ... ,ay, ..~p~;..~ ........~.~.~
-- - .D Ihas ..~
.........~~Z$
......... · ... . B~ ... '
ed ~c ~"
('ot's'rl' (}v ......... } ~-.
.... . kJwe ~, a ~ola:). I'd,lq ~ ~d i,~ Q~I ~lale. I~f~ll~
3o67a.~,
.... Carol L. nit. dr
x,,.- ,T,~ ;,' ,;;,~T ...........
m
I0-0~-84 84-RI99
CR,~r OF EASE}Err
KAISER ,t~rNA, a CAIn. farina Sane[el Partnership, to
SOUT!~R~ C,~LZPOR,qIA gDISCft C(14PANy, a corporation
I~ORK ORDER ~10, 6077-6865/1-6825
t
t
EXIIIalT "^..
That certain llO-foot vide road, kno~m as Har~.arita Road, lying vithin that
portion or Ranthe Temecula, Milch Ranthe vas Granted by the Goverunent of the
United States to Idols Vignes b). Patent, dated January 18, 1860# and recorded
in P-oak l, Pa~e 37 of Patents, in the Office of Khe Ca,hi). Recorder of the
County oE San DieGo, -'.tats o£ California.
The center line of said llO-/oot vide road is described as £ollovs:
Boainning at the intersection of the center line of said },'argo[ira Road and
the intersection of Ranthe California Road ac described in that certain road
dedication of said HatBarite Road to the CourtLy of Riversido~ recorded as
Doeurjent ~o./~142 on April 28, 1971, vhich interlaceion is the r;ortherly
terminus of a curve concave to the Ealt~ hrvinC a radius e e. Zg00 feet and a
central anSle of 45° Jlw 18,,; thence Southerly alone said curve J520.61 feet;
thence South 42° 28t 4(P' East, 2831.62 feet to the be~irmin~ of a curve concave
to the Northeast, havana a radius of 2000 feet and a contr;:l ankle of 13o+13.
thence Southeasterly alon~ said curve, 461.57 feet; thence South 55° A2
k'est, 415.09 fcec to the bealonin~ of a curve concave co the Southwest having
a radius of 1200 feet and o central an~le of 27° 26, 45"; thence Southeasterly
alon~ said curve, 574.82 feet; thence South 26- lS' 18" East~ 805.28 feet to
the betinninG of a curve concave to the |;est, hevlnp:, a radius or 2000 feet and
a central Anale or 17' 16~ SG*; Sitenee Southe[iT alone said curve, 603.21 feet;
thence South lO· 58~ 28" EAsC~ 566.39 feet to LI. ber, innin~ of I curve concave
to the Northealt~ having a radiul of 1200 feat el. a central an~le of 60' 39e 16";
thence Soud~easterly alon] sold curve, 1270.3~ feet; thence South 71° 37~ 4~'
F. aat; 661.3~ feat to the be~fuAiq of a curve concave to the Southvest, havL
a radius of 1200 feet and · central anale of 5~° 41~ 38 thence
"; Southerly along
said curve, 1145.51 feet; thence South 16* 56* 06" East to the into[section of
said center line vith the North line of State IlLSbray 71.
ALSO, 23 strips of land, each 4 feet Ln vLdth, lyin& githin said Crantorws
ProPerty# the Points of SeXinning'of said strips are listed alphabetically and
described as foilova:
BeG/[mini on the Northerly line of State IILGhvay 71, as it nov exists, at a
point Horth 73° 23t 17" East, S4.00 feec free the center line of rearBarite Road,
as Lt nov exists. thence South 14° 33, 26" E -
after rare[ted t; as Point "A"' thence No ant, 23~I feet to a point hereLn-
thence North 18° 59, 2~" k'est ~260 17 fee!.;t14' 3'3 26" ~'csc, 213.71 feet.
feet; thence North IS' 06* 16'| ~'~s~: ~ . eat; r-hence North 18* 32' 03"
'~'0;7; [hence North 16' 56r'g~st,'7
~ feet; thence North 16' 56' 06"'T~, ~+feet to apoir. t her
referr.dPe,nt .,...; th.ncc .orth 2, lO' ... 50.27 ,c.t
he[sins[car referred to as Point thence I~orth 33° 06' 24" nest# 2~.I; feet
:"~';
to a point he[sine[tar referred to as Point '17'; thence l,'orth/~0 56~ 47' I~est,
259.31 feet to a point hereinn[tar referred to 8s Point "E"; thence .~orth
36' ~t l~xe ~;est, 25g.3l feet to o point here/halter re/erred to as Point ."1~,;
thence North 68* 19e 2t,,, ~;est, 251.02 feet to a point hereinn[tar referred to as
Point "~,; thence North 7l° 37t ~,, k'est, 502.00 fOOt tO -~ point heroine[tar
fez'red to as Point "Jr'; thence North 69' 17~ 50~' ~;esc, 251.67 ~oet to a point
hereLnafcer referred to as Point 'Z"; ~hence North S7' 32' 0~" West, 25g.95 feet
to a point heroine[car referred to as Point e'J~,; thence North ~,~' 37t Ol' ~est,
259.95 feet to a point hereinn[tar referred to as Point "l~'; thence North
31° 21e ~:~' ~est, 273.~3 feet to a point hereinn[tar referred to as Point "L*';
thence I;orth 17° 46t ZZ' ~/eat, 273.43 feet to a point he[sinG[tar referred to as
Point "Jr,; thence North l0° 58~ 28" ~esC, 562.76 feet to a point hcrein~fteF
referred to as Point "~'; thence North 140 5lt 35" Lest, 277.~8 feet to a point
liars/halter referred co as Point *'(7'; thence North 22° 3~ 5OF' nest; 277.48 feet
to a point hereinn[tot referred co as Point "l~.; thence North 28° 0no 03" ~elt,
279.33 feet; thence North ~J' X5t 25" I~eat, 558.00 feet to a point beTeLhalter
referred to as Point ',~f,; thence North 32° lie 33" ~est, 270.A8 feet to a point
he[clue[tar re[cried co al Point ".1~'; thence North ~o 32' 41' West, 276.61 feet
to a point he[sin/fieF refez~red to as Point "S"; thence ~;orth 5~°/.8~ 2CF' ~'esc,
276.67 feet to a point hereinn[tar re~crred to as Point "1"; thence Z~orth 55°
~est, 272.76 feet co a point hereira[tar referred to as Point "U"; thence North
71* ~* 47" ~est 256.00 feet
thence North 4~0'2~ 07" ~est, to I point hereKnitter referred to as Point
Point "V,; thence North 42° 28" 4{7' ;~eat, 2602.01/~et to a point hereinn[tar
referTed to as Point "~,. 274.78 feet co a point hereLnafter feEs[Ted to as
306729
o
26507
GRANT OF EASDENT , I:CXZBZT "A" - PAGE 2
' KAZSER AETNA, m Californil general plrtnershipt to
SGJTIIZRN C<FORNL~' EDZS~It C~!PANy, a corporation
~OgK ORDER NO. 6077-6865/1-682~
The center lines of said A-foot strips are described as foilors:
STRIp NO. l: Begis'in; at said Point **A"; thence South 19o 30f 47" hit,
STKTP NO. 2: Eelinning at said Point "B"; thence North 68° 25, 55'* East,
STR~ NO. 3: BeGinning at said PoAnt "Ca; thence North 62° ~5' 08** East,
STP, ZP NO, 4: Beginning at said Point *'tY'; theses North 510 O2" 0~* East,
STRIp NO. 5: Beginning at said Point "A'*~ thonGs North 39' O4' 32" East,
STMP NO. 6: Beginning at said Point "p,; thencl North 27' 23' Z2' 'East,
S'Z~Tp NO. 7: Beginning at said Point ":,; thence North 20° 02' 0~' East,
STRIP NO, 8: hSinning at said Point **It,; theriG- South 21' 52' 07*' Nest,
STRIP 140, 9: ZeginninX ac said Point **Z"; thence South 26° 00' 16" Vest,
STRIp NO, SO: Beginning at said Point **J,,; thence South 38' 55' 2~*' Vest,
STRIp NO; lh BeStusing at said Point **K'*; theses S~uth 5Z* 50' 3r' Vest,
STP. ZP NO, 12: BeEinning at said Point *'U'; thence South 65* 26, Or* Neat,
ST&Zp I~O, 23: Beginning at said Point '*~f,; these( ~th 82* 25* 2~'* West,
STRIP NO. 14: Beginning at said Point '*h"; thence North 79' Ol' 31" East,
STRIp 1~0.
STRIp NO,
STRIp NO.
15: Beginning at said Point "47'; thence North 72" 1~' 37" gut,
26: Beginning at said Point '*r'; thence North 6~· 38' 37' East,
STRip NO.
STRIp NO.
STRIp NO,
17: Beginning at said Point "Q,,; thence North 59* t,6' 31" East,
18: Beginning at said Point at'; thenee North 51' 50' 05" East,
38.51 £eet.
25 feet.
25 feet.
25 feet.
25 feet.
25 feet.
25 feet.
13,67 feet.
9.67 feel
9.67 feet.
11.67 feet.
9,67 feet,
9,67 feet.
25 feet.
25 feet.
25 feet.
40 feet,
26 feet,
19: BeEinning at said Point *'S"; thence North 39* O~e 31" East, 25 feet.
20: Beginning at said Point **~',~ thence North 3~o' 46e 2~' East, 25. feet,
21: Beginning at said Point **~,; thence North 26° 20e 06'* Eat, 30 feat.
STRZP NO. 22: Ea~inning at arid Point **Ire; thence South 57* 16' I~" West, 25 feet.
STRIP NO. 23: Beginning at said Point **i~*; thence South 46° 330 37" Vest, 65 feet.
ALSO, a scrip of Zand 10 feet in vldth, lying vtthin said Grantor*s p~operty, the
center line of vhich ~s described as foXlays:
Beginning at said Point **X"; thence Aorth 66' 220 1~' Vest, ~6~,66 feet; thence
'North 50* 57' ~7" East; 61,88 feet;
None of the rights granted heroin shall be so construed ms as to permit the Grantee
to install or operate television cable antenna systems or similar television reception
medim~ sd~ich is nnc for the sole use of the Grantee in the conduct of its business ms
an electric public utility.
It is qrced and understood that the facilities to bc lnstall'ed b7 virtue of the rtShtm
h~iein Branted are to be located behind the curb position ea said curb position is pre-
n ~.t of t~ay in Standard 1~o, 102 of OFdinan~e No, 461 of
a~ds and SPnctficattous of the County of Riverstie as
adopted Ad&qJst 24, 1971~ EXCElliNG Strips numbered 8, 9, 10# ~1; 12 end 13.
0
I
e
TO JEBC~
.TO 3 8C~ -'/S/if3.
TO 380.
.:D,O,
":1-
3- 0~') - '715'Q4.-"
MHE. GLIAI~,I3
3 ?..If,,,~
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY
ITEM
NO.
1
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
HELD MARCH 23, 1993
A regular meeting of the Temecula Redevelopment Agency was called to order at 11:20 PM.
PRESENT: 5 AGENCY MEMBERS: Birdsall, Mufioz, Roberrs,
Stone, Parks
ABSENT: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None
Also present were Executive Director David F. Dixon, General Counsel Scott F. Field and
Agency Secretary June S. Greek.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None given.
AGENCY BUSINESS
1. Minutes
It was moved by Member Mufioz, seconded by Member Birdsall to approve the minutes
of March 9, 1993. The motion was unanimously carried.
The Economics Research Associates (ERA) Labor Force Study
Assistant City Manager Woody Edvalson presented the staff report.
Member Mu~oz objected to the expenditure of funds for this study, stating he believes
the information can be obtained in another manner.
City Manager Dixon reported this information is extremely valuable in providing
information to businesses wishing to locate in the area and draw upon the labor force
made up of the people living here.
It was moved by Member Birdsall, seconded by Member Parks to approve staff
recommendation and authorize the Executive Director to finalize negotiations and sign
a contract with Economics Research Associates (ERA) to provide a labor force study
for the City of Temecula in an amount not to exceed $16,500.00.
Member Stone stated he feels the City has expended enough funds and suggested
referring this back to staff to see if the information could be obtained in another more
cost-effective manner.
Member Birdsall withdrew her motion, Member Parks withdrew his second.
~ RDAMIN~032393 - 1 - 04/05/93
Temecula Redevelopment Agency Minutes March 23. 1993
It was moved by Member Mufioz, seconded by Member Stone to refer the matter back
to staff for follow-up report to be presented at the meeting of April 13, 1993.
The motion was unanimously carried.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
Executive Director Dixon reported progress on business retention and stated the proposed
expansion of Professional Hospital Supply is going well, and staff will place this matter on the
Agenda of April 13, 1993 for Council consideration.
GENERAL COUNSEL'S REPORT
None given.
AGENCY MEMBERS REPORTS
None given.
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Member Stone, seconded by Member Roberts to adjourn at 11:35 PM.
Ronald J. Parks, Chairperson
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk/Agency Secretary
RDAMIN~J2393 -2- 04/05/9~
ITEM
NO.
2
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICE~
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Agency Members/Executive Director
Harwood T. Edvalson, Assistant City Manager
April 27, 1993
THE ERA LABOR FORCE STUDY
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council continue this item to the meeting of April 27, 1993,
allowing staff and the Mayor to discuss alternative methods to obtaining the
desired information.
ITEM NO. 3
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER '
CITY MANAGER
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
Executive Director/Redevelopment Agency Members
FROM:
Mary Jane McLarney, Finance Officer
DATE:
April 13, 1993
SUBJECT:
Response to Requirements of SB 617
RECOMMENDATION: That the Agency Members authorize the Finance Officer to
forward the attached correspondence to the County of Riverside regarding the
payment of tax increment to the Education Revenue Augmentation Fund ("ERAF").
DISCUSSION: Based on our discussions with the City Attorney, it is
necessary to forward the attached correspondence to the County of Riverside to
express the City's concerns regarding the legality of making the ERAF payment. The
amount in dispute is $575,000.
ATTACHMENT:
Correspondence to County of Riverside
Anthony Bellanca, County Auditor Controller
RE: SB 617 Payment
1993
City of Ternecula
43174 Business Park Drive · Temecula, California 92590
(909) 694-1989 · FAX (909) 694-19
Anthony Bellanca
County Auditor Controller
4080 Eleventh SWeet, 1 l th Floor
Riverside, California 92501'
RE: SB 617 Payment
Dear Mr. Bellanca:
This report is authorized by the Temecula City Council and Redevelopment Agency Board in
response to the requirements of SB 617 that 15% of all tax increments allocated to the City's
Redevelopment Agency for '90-'91 fiscal year be deposited in the Education Revenue
Augmentation Fund ("ERAF').
Regardless of whether the funds may be available to make such a payment, the Redevelopment
Agency is concerned that for a variety of reasons the requirement for this payment is illegal.
Therefore, at this time the Agency reserves its right to withhold the payment required by SB 617
or in the alternative to make the payment under protest.
The concern of the Agency is based upon several issues. First is that pursuant to Article XVI
Section 16 of the California Constitution, tax increment funds may be used only to benefit the
redevelopment area which generates it. SB 617 attempts to deal with this by defining the
required payment as an "indebtedness" of the redevelopment project generating the tax increment
funds. However, since the money from the ERAF simply supplants funds which are otherwise
required to be paid out of the State general fund monies by Article XVI Section 8, in reality this
payment does nothing to benefit the affected redevelopment area nor is an indebtedness
voluntarily entered into by the Agency which has authority over allocation of tax increment
funds.
Second, this mandated payment would appear to be a gift of public funds prohibited by Article
XVI Section 6 of the State Constitution. Third, the Temecula Redevelopment Agency was not
in existence during fiscal year '90-'91. During that year the affected redevelopment area was
administered by Riverside County. The County was the recipient of the tax increment for fiscal
year '90-'91 and at the time the Redevelopment area was transferred over to the Temecula
Anthony Bellanca
March 22, 1993
Page 2
Agency there was no carry over of funds from that fiscal year. Therefore, since SB 617
purports to mandate an assessment of funds from fiscal year '90-'91, this would be a debt of the
Agency which was the recipient of the tax increment funds for that fiscal year. It is therefor our
position that ff indeed the attempted tax increment diversion of SB 617 is legally valid, then the
obligation for payment is an obligation of Riverside County.
Based upon the arguments outlined above, no transfer of tax increment funds for the Temecula
Redevelopment Agency can be legally justified. The Agency Board will therefore take under
consideration whether or not it should make any payment under protest or simply withhold
funds. We also advise you that although SB 617 purports to provide the County Auditor
Controller with the power to divert City property taxes in order to pay the mount to be diverted
from the fiscal year '90-'91 Agency tax increment required to be paid to the ERAF, Article XVI
Section 6 prohibits the State legislature from authorizing the diversion of funds from one agency
to pay the debts of another. Consequently, we advise you against attempting any such transfer.
Sincerely,
Mary Jane McLamey
Finance Officer
City of TemeculaJ
Temecula Redevelopment Agency
gnvuajp
David F. Dixon, City Manager
Scott F. Field, City Attorney
ITEM NO.
4
APPROVAL
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Agency Members/Executive Director
Harwood To Edvalson, Assistant City Manager
April 13, 1993
RANCHO WEST APARTMENTS
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council adopt the following Resolution:
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 93-
A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF TEMECULA,
CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE PREPARATION OF A BONA FIDE OFFER TO
PURCHASE CERTAIN PROPERTY AND AFFIRMING THE AGENCY'S
COMMITMENT TO MEET THE LOWER-INCOME REQUIREMENTS OF THE
RESOLUTION TRUST CORPORATION'S AFFORDABLE HOUSING DISPOSITION
PROGRAM.
JUSTIFICATION:
The purchase of the Rancho West Apartments will help satisfy the Agency's obligation to
appropriately use the 20% of tax increment which has been set-aside for the purposes of
increasing or improving the City's supply of housing for persons and families of low or
moderate income. The Agency's purchase of this property will protect a portion of the City's
available housing stock for low and moderate income individuals, and guarantee its availability
for an extended period of time.
BACKGROUND:
The City has been approached by the Resolution Trust Corporation (RTC) to gage the City's
interest in purchasing the Rancho West Apartments. These apartments became available
through the' RTC's bail-out of failed savings and loan institutions. The Rancho West
apartments went through a period open to public bid. Remaining unsold at public auction, the
property is now offered to governments and non-profit organizations.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Initial estimates were based on inaccurate information. It is now anticipated that with the
Agency dedicating approximately 50% of the units toward low and very low income families
the cost of the project will be approximately $2,900,000. Depending on the type of financing
used, the RTC will require a minimum of 5% down ($145,000), plus approximately $10,000
in closing costs.
Based upon the information provided by Southern California Housing Development
Corporation, immediate rehabilitation costs to the parking lots, landscaping and painting of
common areas are estimated at $50,000. The City may also wish to consider the
construction of a retaining wall to protect the property against future flooding along Murrieta
Creek ($50,000).
Annual operating costs are estimated to 13e $250,000. Operations would include debt service
and property management. The total cost for purchase and improvement of the property is
estimated to be $3,000,000 with the opportunity to finance $2,755,000 with the RTC.
Additional funds beyond the anticipated operating income for the property may be required
to contract for management services for the property.
Funds for the purchase and improvements would be available from the Housing Set Aside
Fund of the Redevelopment Agency. All costs will be finalized before a formal offer is
recommended to the Agency Board for offer to the RTC.
Attachment: Notice of Serious Interest
RESOLUTION NO. RDA
A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPNIF~NT AGENCY OF
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE PREPARATION OF
A BONA FIDE OFFER TO PURCHASE CERTAIN PROPERTY AND
AFFIRMING THE AGENCY'S COMMITMENT TO MEET THE
LOWER-INCOME REQUIREME~NTS OF THE RESOLUTION TRUST
CORPORATION'S AFFORDABLE HOUSING DISPOSITION
PROGRAM
WHEREAS, through its Affordable Housing Disposition Program, the Resolution
Trust Corporation CRTC") is offering to sell directly to any public agency serving Temecula
a property known as the Rancho West Apartments ("Rancho West"), located at 28680 Pujol
SWeet, Temecula, California, for operation as multi-family affordable housing; and
WHEREAS, any public agency interested in purchasing Rancho West must submit a
completed Notice of Serious Interest within the thirty day marketing period which
commenced on March 15, 1993; and
WHEREAS, the Notice of Serious Interest must be accompanied by a resolution of
the governing body of the public agency authorizing the preparation of a bona fide offer to
purchase the property; and
WHEREAS, the resolution must also affirm the public agency's commitment to
meeting the lower-income requirements of RTC's Affordable Housing Disposition Program;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE REDEVELOPMF~NT AGENCY OF TEMECULA
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the Executive Director of the Redevelopment Agency of Temecula
is hereby authorized to prepare a bona fide offer to Purchase the Rancho West Apaxtments
through the RTC's Affordable Housing Disposition Program. The amount of the bona fide
offer is subject to the approval of the Redevelopment Agency of Temecula.
Section 2. That the Redevelopment Agency of Temecula's commitment to meeting
the lower-income requirements of RTC's Affordable Housing Disposition Program is hereby
affirmed.
Section 3.
Resolution.
The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this
RDA005 - 1 - 04105/93
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOFrED this 13th day of April, 1993.
ATI'EST:
Ronald J. Parks, Chairperson.
By:
June S. Greek, City Clerk/Agency Secretary
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE)
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk/Secretary to the Redevelopment Agency of Temecula,
HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. RDA 93- was duly adopted at a
regular meeting of the Redevelopment Agency of Temecula on the 13th day of April, 1993
by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
AGENCY MEMBERS:
AGENCY MEMBERS:
AGENCY MEMBERS:
June S. Greek, City Clerk/Agency Secretary
RDA005 -2- 0410519~
Revised
August 10, 1992
RESOLUTION TRUST CORPORATION
AFFORDABLE HOUSING DISPOSITION PROGRAM
Notice of Serious Interest
Property Address (or
state "Bulk Sale Proposal ,, ):
Rancho West Apartments
28680 Pujol Street
Temecula, CA 92590
Offeror's Federal Tax ID Number
33-0383649
Date: March 22, 1993
Marketing Agent:
Offeror ' s Name
Temecula Redevelopment Agency
The undersigned Offeror hereby confirms it serious interest in
purchasing
/ x / the above-named eligible multifamily Property
[OR3
/ in bulk, the eligible properties listed on
Attachment 3
from the Resolution Trust Corporation in accordance with the
Provisions of 12 CFRPart 1609. The undersigned intends to Prepare
a bona fide offer and has the ability to purchase the Property.
A. The undersigned acknowledges that it is a Public agency
as defined in definitions section of this document.
Preparation of a bona fide offer for the property and affirming the
commitment to meet the lower-income requirements.
C. The undersigned submits herewith, as Attachment 2, a
recent financial statement and evidence of a source of equity
funds.
D. The undersigned submits herewith, as Attachment 4 a
completed "Public Agency Questionnaire.,, ,
E. The undersigned hereby acknowledges that it may .be
required, in accordance with RTC Policies, =o provide information
as to its previous Participation (and that of related entities) in
federal Procuremen= and non-procurement programs, and that its
opportunity to purchase the property which is the subject of this
CERTIFICATION
The individual signing this certification represents and
warrants that he/she has the authority to execute this
certification on behalf of Offeror and certifies that to the best
of his/her belief and knowledge all information on all Pages
submitted is true and correct. Offeror understands that RTC will
rely upon the information and certifications contained herein in
NOTICE: Whoever knowingly or willfully makes false or
fraudulent statements or representations in connection with the
disclosures and certifications herein may be subject to fines and
or imprisonment (18 U.S.C. 1001).
Signature of Principal or
Offeror,s Name
(Please print or type)
Temecu~a RedeveloDment A~en~v
Officer
Z"Name and Title of Principal
or Officer (Please Print or
type. )
David F. Dixon, Executive Director
Date Signed
II.
Attactment 4
PUBLIC AGENCY OUESTIONNAIRE
I. A~encv Information
Agency: Temecula Redevelopment Agency
Executive Director: David F. Dixon Title Executive Director
Contact: Harwooa T. RdvalsonTitleAsst. City Mgr. Phone (909) 694-1989
Fax (909) 694-1999
Address: 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula, CA 92590
Ronald J. Parks, Chairperson
Governing Body: J. Sal Munoz, Vice Chairperson
Geographic Jurisdiction (Name of City, County, Region or
State)
A~encv Role
A. Is Agency
properties.
a. X
b.
interested in acquiring multi-family rental
(Can check more than i box)
Yes, as long-term owner
Yes, but only until resale to 3rd party
buyer
Yes, but only-if immediate resale to
3rd party
No, but would assist 3rd party acquire
No interest
Does agency have exPerience as Property owner?
Describe briefly: Yes. vacant undeveloped property.
Any experience with lower-income rental ProPerties?
No
Who would manage Properties, and their experience?
Contract service; unknown at present time.
Who would Provide maintenance and similar services$
Contract service. ·
Would title be held in name of agency or related
nonprofit~
· Temecula Reaeve]~ment A~nry.
Does agency have any direct experience with
rehabilitation . .
briefly. No. of multi-family Properties? Describe
Does agency anticipate using RTC seller financing~
a... Bridge .
b. x Permanent (15 yr, 30 yr amortization)
t First mortgage
_____ Second Mortgage
DEFINITIONS
The following definitions should be used by Offerors in
completing this form.
1. "Management official" means any individual within Offeror,s
organization who has substantial responsibility for the direction
and control of Offeror,s policies and operations. With respect to
Partnerships, this means each of the general partners.
incl2.. "Non-profit organization,, means a private organization
( udlng a limited equity cooperative) no part of the net
earnings of which inures to the benefit of any member, shareholder,
founder, contributor, or individual.
3. "Offeror" means the entity submitting this Notice of
Serious Interest.
4, "Public agency,, means any Federal, State, local, or other
governmental entity, and includes any public housing agency.
5. "Related entity,, means:
(a) Offeror,s management officials;
(b) Any individual or entity that controls or is
controlled by or is under common control with Offeror;
(c) Any other entity that is controlled by any of
Offeror's management officials.
For purposes of this definition, an individual or entity shall be
presumed to have control of a company or organization of the
individual or entity directly or indirectly, or acting in concert
with one or more individuals or entities, or through one or more
subsidiaries, owns or controls 25 percent or more of its equity, or
otherwise controls its management or policies.
6. "RTC" means the Resolution Trust Corporation established
Pursuant to Section 501(a) of the Financial Institutions Reform,
Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989.
3
Part III Property Hanagement Plan
To be filled out by Agency or acquiring
Owner:
Name, address, Phone number and
third-party Owner. N/A Principal
( ) -
Property Name and Address:
third-party
contact person of
Rancho West Apartments
28680 P~o] ~t~
Temecula. CA 92590
be utilized to
Describe how this Property will
organization,s mission.
further the
Describe PoPulation to be served.
Describe services
aPPlicable). N/A
to be Provided in
addition to housing (if
Describe marketing Program. *
screened, monitored? How will residents be identified,
Zss~ribe the management plan· who · *
their exPerience, curr~n Ill manage the pro err
What is the Proposed rent
low- and very low- income
structure, Proposed
units?
,
commitment to
* attach additional sheets as necessary
If yes to "a" or "b" or "C":
Are there legal restrictions on Agency's ability to
acquire lower-income rental properties. No
If yes to "b" or "c":
How would Agency select 3rd party purchaser
N/A ·
What is
nonprofits
N/A
Agency,s background in working with
or other low-income housing Providers?
If yes to "a" or "b" or "C" or
10. Are there financial or other resources Agency might
seek to utilize in financing rehabilitation 6~ other
costs or replacing RTC seller financing·
Describe resource briefly, including general
availability for this purpose. Yes, tax increment
bond~ne of low-moderate income set aside funds.
Describe Agency,s recent, relevant exPerience with
this resource. Agency has recently sold approx. $17 million
in tax increment supported bonds·
If Agency is interested in future Purchases of RTC Properties,
Please complete the following:
11.
Describe additional Properties in which Agency might
be interested:
Geographic area (jurisdiction): Temecula, CA
Number of units per property:
Minimum 25
Maximum 500.
Type of Properties:
~"l~-F~m41y/rnmm~vr~ml office
Condition of Properties: avg.
12. What order .of magnitude of Properties would Agency
be interested in acquiring or assisting others
purchase, eg. total number of units, or Properties·
13. Describe role or roles Agency would be willing to
play. l nRZ-~pvm ownerhsip or inter4m owner for 3rd Party
non-prnf4 t resale.
ATTACHMENT= PART Ill/PROPERTY MANAGEMENT PLAN
3. The Temecula Redevelopment Agency has a goal to use 20% of its
tax increment to improve the quantity and quality of housing
available to low and moderate income persons. The Agency has a
further goal to set aside at least 30% of all new or rehabilitated
residential units within its project area for persons or families
of low and moderate income. The City of Temecula also has goals
within its Housing Element of the General Plan to preserve the
availability of affordable housing. The purchase of the Rancho
West Apartments helps the Agency and City of Temecula with its
affordable housing goals.
4. As a mixed rent facility, it is anticipated that this project
will cater to the needs of not only citizens capable of paying
prevailing market rates for this type of rental housing, but also
to approximately 75 low and very low income households, accounting
for a maximum of 335 persons in this lower income housing.
5. Not applicable.
6. The Temecula Redevelopment Agency will rely upon the expertise
of its selected property management group to identify, screen, and
monitor the projects residents. The Agency will monitor the
property manager's performance to verify compliance with applicable
local, state and federal laws.
7. The Temecula Redevelopment Agency will contract with a third
party property management group to provide property management
selection. At least two non-profit entities have registered
interest in the management of this property, i.e., the Southern
California Housing Development Corporation and the Riverside County
Housing Authority. The Redevelopmerit Agency intends to go through
a Request for Qualification/Proposal process in selecting a
qualified property management group.
8. It is anticipated that approximately 50% of the 150 units will
be dedicated to low and very low income persons or families. It is
further anticipated that the rent structures for the low and very
low income units will be respectively for one and two bedroom
units:
Very Low Income--
Low Income--
$265/$355 per month
$360/$450 per month
Market rate is anticipated to be approximately $425 for one bedroom
and $500 per month for two bedrooms.