HomeMy WebLinkAbout090892 CC AgendaAGENDA
TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
A REGULAR MEETING
TEMECULA COMMUNITY CENTER - 28816 PUJOL STREET
SEPTEMBER 8, 1992 - 7:00 PM
SCHOOL
0¢',
At approximately 9:45 PM, the City Council will
determine which of the remaining agenda items
_ can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00
' PM and may continue all other items on which
· additional time is required 6ntil a future meeting.
All meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 PM
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. 92-14
Resolution: No. 92-66
CALL TO ORDER:
Mayor Patricia H. Birdsall presiding
Invocation
Pastor Gary Ruly, HIS Church Christian Center
Flag Salute
Councilmember Mu~oz
ROLL CALL:
Lindemans, Moore, Mu~oz, Parks, Birdsall
PRESENTATIONS/
PROCLAMATIONS
PUBLIC FORUM
This is a portion of the City Council meeting unique to the City of Temecula. At the
meeting held on the second .Tuesday of each month, the City Council will devote a
period of time (not to exceed 30 minutes) for the purpose of providing the public with
an opportunity to discuss topics of interest with the Council. The members of the City
Council will respond to questions and may give direction to City staff. The Council is
prohibited, by the provisions of the Brown Act, from taking any official action on any
matter which is not on the agenda. If you desire to speak on any matter which is not
listed on the agenda, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with
the City Clerk.
For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk
b~fore the Council gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual
speakers.
21egenda/090892
09~2~2
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be
enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless
members of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent
Calendar for separate action.
CONSENT CALENDAR
2
3
Standard Ordinance Adoption Procedure
RECOMMENDATION
1.1
Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions
included in the agenda.
Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve the minutes of the meeting of August 11, 1992
2.2 Approve the minutes of the meeting of August 25, 1992
Resolution ADDrovina List of Demands
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 92-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
2/agertde/OeOBg2 2 Oe/O2/g2
4
Advance for Land Survevina and Geotechnical Services for Margarita Road Extension
Interim Improvements (Proiect No. PW 92-04)
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1
Make a finding that the extension of Margarita road will benefit the
redevelopment project area, and the immediate neighborhood in which
the road extension is located and; there are no other reasonable means
of financing the road extension.
4.2
Approve an advance of $46,300 from the General Fund Revolving Fund
to the Redevelopment Agency (RDA) for Land Surveying and
Geotechnical Services for the construction of Margarita Road Extension
Interim Improvements.
5
Award of Contract for FY 92-93 City-wide Street StrioinQ and Stenciling Contract
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1
Award a contract for the City-wide Street Striping and Stenciling to
Orange County Striping Service, Inc. for FY 92-93 and authorize the
Mayor and the City Clerk to execute the contract.
6
Final Parcel MaD No. 27545
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1 Approve Final Parcel Map No. 27545 subject to the Conditions of
Approval.
7
"No Parking" Zones on Jefferson Avenue. North of Winchester Road
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 92-_
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ESTABLISHING "NO PARKING" ZONES IN THE AREA ADJACENT TO
JEFFERSON AVENUE BETWEEN WINCHESTER ROAD AND NORTHERLY CITY
LIMITS.
21agendd0e08e2 3 oe/02fe2
8
10
11
"No Parkinq" Zones on Moreno Road
RECOMMENDATION:
8.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 92-_
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
ESTABLISHING "NO PARKING" ZONES ON MORENO ROAD
OF TEMECULA
Installation of Stop SiQns at Various Locations
RECOMMENDATION:
9.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 92-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
ESTABLISHING "STOP" SIGNS
OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
"No Parkina" Zone Desianations Within the Initial Bike Lane Proiect
RECOMMENDATION:
10.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 92-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
ESTABLISHING "NO PARKING" ZONES IN
INITIAL BIKE LANE PROJECT.
OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
DESIGNATED AREAS OF THE
Contract Change Order on Project PW 91-03, Rancho California Road Benefit District
A reduction in the contract price for the Rancho California Road widening project.
RECOMMENDATION:
11.1 Approve Contract Change Order No. 010, reducing the total contract
amount by $7,867.90 as detailed in the staff report.
21agencle/OlO892
09~2~2
12 Rancho California Road Water District - Fire Mitigation Fee
RECOMMENDATION:
12.1
Authorize a refund to the Rancho California water district of a Fire
Mitigation Fee in the amount of $17,167.50 paid for the Rancho
California Water District headquarters.
13
ApprOval Of RedeveloDment Fundino for Storm Drain Improvements on Front Street/I-
15 with PM 22515 and CUP No. 5
RECOMMENDATION:
13.1
Make a finding that the construction of Storm Drain Improvements on
Front Street/I-15 with PM 22515 and CUP No. 5 will benefit the
redevelopment project area, and the immediate neighborhood in which
the Storm Drain Improvements are located; and that there are no other
reasonable means of financing these Storm Drain Improvements.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before a public
hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the
approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the
projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or
someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondences
delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing.
14 Change of Zone No. 5631Nestina Tentative T~act MaD No 25320
Property located on the North Side of Pauba Road between Ynez and Margarita Roads)
(Continued from the meeting of August 25, 1992)
RECOMMENDATION:
14.1
Continue Change of Zone No. 5631 and Vesting Tentative Tract Map
No. 25320 to the meeting of September 22, 1992.
2/,Oencla/OgO8g2
COUNCIL BUSINESS
15 Discussion of Combinina Public Safety and Traffic and Transoortation Commissions
(Continued from the meeting of August 11, 1992)
RECOMMENDATION:
15.1 Review Options and Direct Staff Regarding Desired Course of Action.
6 0g/02/~2
16
17
18
Speed Limit Reduction on Pauba Road from Ynez Road to Meadows Parkway
RECOMMENDATION:
16.1 Read by title only and introduce and ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 92-_
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
AMENDING SECTION 12.02.010 (d) OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE
REDUCING PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS ON PAUBA ROAD BETWEEN YNEZ
ROAD AND MEADOWS PARKWAY
EmerQenc¥ Manaeer Job Status
Discussion of Public Safety Commission memorandum.
Discussion of Commission Recognition Banouet
(Placed on the agenda at the request of Mayor Birdsall)
19 Consideration of Allocation for Bus Stop MaD and Schedule Holders
(Placed on the agenda at the request of Councilmember Mu~oz)
RECOMMENDATION:
19.1 Allocate an amount (not to exceed $3,000) for the purchase of Bus Stop
Map and Schedule Holders.
CITY MANAGER REPORT
CITY ATTORNEY REPORT
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT
Next meeting: Wednesday, September 9, 1992, 5:00 PM, Capital Improvement
Program, City Hall Main Conference Room, 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California
Next regular meeting: September 22, 1992, 7:00 PM, Temecula Community Center,
28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California
211gendl/O90882 6 0//02/~2
TEMECULA::COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING .i'(To be held at 8:00)
CALL TO ORDER:
ROLL CALL:
PUBLIC COMMENT:
President Ronald J. Parks
DIRECTORS:
Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Mu~oz, Parks
Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors, should
present a completed pink "Request to Speak" to the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state
your name and address for the record.
CONSENT CALEND/~,R
1 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of the meeting of August 11, 1992.
1.2 Approve the minutes of the meeting of August 25, 1992.
DISTRICT BUSINESS
2 NaminQ of Two Mini-parkS
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 92-
2.2
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD O.c DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ADOPTING A POLICY FOR NAMING PARKS
AND RECREATION FACILITIES
Approve the names of two mini-parks located within the Village Encore
development, south of Rancho California Road and east of Margarita Road.
GENERAL MANAGERS REPORT - Dixon
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT - Nelson
BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT:
Next regular meeting September 22, 1992, 8:00 PM, Temecula
Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California
21egenda/080882 7 08/02/82
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY:MEETING :
CALL TO ORDER:
ROLL CALL:
PUBLIC COMMENT:
Chairperson J. Sal Mu~oz presiding
AGENCY MEMBERS:
Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Parks,
Mu~oz
Anyone wishing to address the Agency, should present a
completed pink "Request to Speak" to the City Clerk. When you
are called to speak, 'please come forward and state your name
and address for the record.
AGENCY BUSINESS
Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of August 11, 1992.
1.2 Approve the minutes of August 25, 1992.
Award of Land Survevina Services Contract to Rick Enaineerina for Margarita Road
Extension Interim Imorovement (PW 92-04)
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1
Approve the award of a Professional Services Agreement in the amount
of $40,000 to Rick Engineering for Land surveying on the Margarita
Road Extension Interim Improvements, Project No. Pw 92-04, and
authorize the Chairperson of the Redevelopment Agency (RDA) and the
City Clerk to execute said contract.
2.2
Advance ~40,000 from the General Fund/Revolving Fund to the RDA.
2.3
Transfer ~40,000 from the RDA fund to the Capital Projects Fund and
appropriate $40,000 to Account No. 021-165-606-5804.
2/egend~/OeOBg2 8 08/02/82
2.4 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 92-
A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA DECLARING CERTAIN FINDINGS REGARDING CITY
EXPENDITURES IN CONNECTION WITH LAND SURVEYING OF THE
MARGARITA ROAD EXTENSION INTERIM IMPROVEMENTS AS REQUIRED BY
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY REGULATION (SECTION
1,103-18)
3
Award of Cobtract to Law Crandall Inc. for Geotechnical Services for MarQarita Road
Extension Interim Improvement (PW 92-04)
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1
Approve award of Professional Services Agreement in the amount of
$6,300 to Law/Crandall Incorporated for Geotechnical Services on the
Margarita Road Extension Interim Improvements Project PW 92-04, and
authorize the Chairperson of the Redevelopment Agency (RDA) and the
city Clerk to execute said contract.
3.2
Advance $6,300 from RDA funds to Capital Projects Funds and
appropriate $6,300 to Account No. 021-165-606-5804.
3.3
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 92-
A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA DECLARING CERTAIN FINDINGS REGARDING CITY
EXPENDITURES IN CONNECTION WITH GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES OF THE
MARGARITA ROAD EXTENSION INTERIM IMPROVEMENTS AS REQUIRED BY
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY REGULATION (SECTION
1,102-18)
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
AGENCY MEMBER'S REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT: Next regular meeting September 22, 1992, 8:00 PM, Temecula
Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California
21egenda/Og0892 9 OejO2/S2
ITEM
1
ITEM
2
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
HELD AUGUST 11, 1992
A regular meeting of the Temecula City Council was called to order at 7:00 P.M. in the
Temecula Community Center, 28818 Pujol Street, Temecula, California. Mayor Patricia H.
Birdsall presiding.
PRESENT: 5
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Lindemans, Moore, Mur~oz, Parks,
Birdsall
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Also present were City Manager David F. Dixon, City Attorney Scott C. Field, and City Clerk
June Greek.
INVOCATION
The invocation was given by Pastor James Field, First Baptist Church.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The audience was led in the pledge of allegiance was led by Mayor Pro Tem Karel Lindemans.
PRESENTATIONS/
PROCLAMATIONS
Joe Hreha presented Mayor Patricia H. Birdsall with the 1992 Recycling Achievement Award
received by the City from the State of California Department of Conservation, at the 16th
Annual Conference of the California Resource Recovery Association, for first place in the
public sector category.
Mayor Birdsall expressed her appreciation to the citizens for the support she received during
her trip to Washington D.C.
City Attorney Scott Field advised that during the closed session the City Council considered
whether to continue to pursue the litigation against the Border Patrol. The City Council has
decided to discontinue this litigation in light of recent cooperation of the Border Patrol.
Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans clarified that the City will continue to monitor the Border Patrol
pursuit policies.
CCMIN8/11/92 -1 - 912192
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES AUGUST 11.1992
PUBLIC FORUM
Mike Thesing, 20391 Via Brisa, Temecula, addressed the Council with his concern that there
are presently too many restaurants for the population in Temecula, and suggested that the
City place a moratorium on any new restaurants for three to four years.
Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans asked that staff provide information from other cities with this type
of moratorium in place.
Councilmember Mu~oz suggested that staff and possibly the Chamber of Commerce could
provide potential entrepreneurs with the facts on the present local economy.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans stated he would abstain from voting on Items No. 9, 10 and 11
due to a conflict of interest.
Councilmember Mu~oz stated he would abstain from voting on Items No. 9 due to a possible
conflict of interest.
Councilmember Parks stated he would abstain from voting on Items No. 8 and 9 due to a
conflict of interest.
It was moved by Councilmember Moore, seconded by Councilmember Mur~oz to approve
Consent Calendar Items I - 8, and 10 - 16.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Mur~oz,
Parks
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Due to a lack of a voting quorum for Item No. 9, the rule of necessity wa declared and lots
were drawn. Councilmember Parks drew the lot to cast a vote on this matter.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded b~.' Councilmember Moore to approve
Consent Calendar Item No. 9.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 3 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Moore, Parks
NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSTAIN: 2 COUNCILMEMBERS: Lindemans, Mu~oz
CCMINB/11192 °2-
gl2192
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
1.
Standard Ordinance Adootion Procedure
1.1
AUGUST 11,1992
Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions
included in the agenda.
2. Minutes
2.1
3. Resolution Aoorovin; List of Demands
3.1
8
Approve the minutes of the meeting of July 14, 1992.
Adopt a resolution entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
Public NuisanCe Abatement - 28613 Pujol Street
4.1 Approve the issuance of a purchase order in the amount of $17,725 to
Hunt Wrecking for the removal of all vehicles and scrap metals.
4.2 Approve the issuance of a purchase order in the amount of $14,845 to
Environmental Recovery Services for the hazardous material removal.
4.3 Appropriate $32,570 for Other Outside Services from Unreserved Fund
Balance.
Continuation of Resolution Establishino Buildina Valuation and MiScellaneous Fee
Schedules
5.1
Continue consideration of this item off calendar to allow adequate time
for a resolution to be achieved.
Amended Condition of ADoroved Tentative Trao~ MaD No. 23209
6.1
Approve the amendment to Condition No. 33.
Award of Professional Engineering Services Contract for an Interchanoe Study on I-15
7.1
The joint Temecula/Murrieta Transportation Committee recommends that
the City Council award a contract for Professional Engineer Services to
NBS/Lowry of San Diego for an amount not to exceed $15,000 to
conduct an interchange Study on I-15 North of Winchester Road;
7.2
Authorize the Mayor to execute the contract.
CCMINBII 1/92 -3- 912192
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES AUGUST 11.1992
8. Renewal of Annual Street Maintenance Contract FY 92-93
8.1
Extend the Street Maintenance Contract as amended with Ramtek
Contractors, Inc. of Temecula for a period of one year (June 30, 1993);
8.2
Authorize the Mayor to execute the contract.
e
Award of Contract for Construction of Street Imorovements on Sixth Street Between
Front Street and Mercedes - PW 92-02
9.1
Award a contract for construction of street and sidewalk improvements
on Sixth Street (Project PW 92-02) to Ramtek Contractors, Inc., for
$41,326.30, and authorize the Mayor to execute said contract.
9.2
Transfer $45,458.93 from the Development Impact Fund to the Capital
Projects Fund and appropriate $45,458.93 (bid amount plus 10% to
allow for possible change orders) to Capital Projects Account No. 021-
165-623-5804.
10.
Award of Professional Services Contract to Leinhton and Associates for Geotechnical
Services on Sixth Street Proiect (PW 92-02)
10.1
Award a professional services contract in the amount of $3,038.00 to
Leighton and Associates for Geotechnical Services on the Sixth Street
Project (PW 92.02) and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said
contract.
10.2
Transfer $3,038.00 from the Development Impact Fund and appropriate
$3,038.00 to the Capital Projects Account No. 021-165-623-5804.
11.
Award of Professional Services Contract to Robert Bein. William Frost and Associates
for Survey Services on Sixth Street (PW 92-02)
11.1
Award a professional services contract in the amount of $4,625.00 to
Robert Bein, William Frost and Associates (RBF) for survey services on
Sixth Street improvements (Project No. PW 92-02), and authorize the
Mayor and City Clerk to sign said contract.
11.2
Transfer $4,625.00 from the Development Impact Fund to the Capital
Projects Account and appropriate $4,625.00 to Capital Projects Account
No. 021-165-623-5804.
12. Acceptance of Public Improvements in Tract No. 21764
12.1
Accept the Public Improvements in Tract No. 21764;
CCMINBI11192 -4- 912/92
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
13.
14.
15.
16.
AUGUST 11, 1992
12.2 Authorize the reduction of Faithful Performance Sewer System Bond and
release of the Subdivision Monumentation Bond;
12.3 Accept the Faithful Performance Maintenance Rider;
12.4 Approve the Subdivision Agreement Rider;
12.5 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors.
Release a Portion of Faithful Performance Bonds and Material and Labor Bonds in
Parcel Mao No. 23496
13.1 Authorize the release of a portion of the Street/Drainage Faithful
Performance Bonds and Labor and Material Bonds in Parcel Map No.
23496;
13.2 Direct the City Clerk to so notify the Developer and Surety.
Release Faithful Performance Securities and Material and Labor Securities in Parcel Mao
NO. 23334
14.1
Authorize the release of Street/Drainage and Sewer and Water System
Faithful Performance Letters of Credit, and Material and Labor Letters of
Credit in Parcel Map No. 23354;
14.2 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors.
Release of Material and Labor Bonds in Parcel MaD No. 23561-1
15.1 Authorize the release of Material and Labor Bonds in Parcel Map No.
23561-1;
15.2 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors.
Release of Material and Labor Bonds in Parcel MaD No. 23561-2
16.1 Authorize the release of Material and Labor Bonds in Parcel Map No.
23561-2;
16.2 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Surety.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
17. Vestina Tentative Tract MaD 25320 and Change of Zone 5631
CCMIN8/11192 -5- 812/92
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Mayor Birdsall opened the public hearing at 7:25 P.M.
AUGUST 11.1992
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Lindemans to
continue Vesting Tentative Tract Map 25320 and Change of Zone 5631 to the meeting
of August 25, 1992. The motion was unanimously carried.
18. Ordinance Regulatino Temporary Signs
Gary Thornhill presented the staff report.
Councilmember Parks asked if banners were permitted under the Ordinance.
Gary Thornhill advised that they are permitted, as long as they are attached to the
building.
Councilmember Lindemans asked what the make-up of the ad-hoc committee was, and
if the Chamber reviewed all the documents prior to endorsing the ordinance.
Gary Thornhill advised that there were four ad-hoc committee meetings with
representatives from real estate, sign businesses, restaurants, the Chamber of
Commerce and several others. He added that there was not consistent attendance at
all of the meetings.
John Meyer added that the ordinance was reviewed and approved by one of the
Chamber's sub-committees.
Mayor Birdsall opened the public hearing at 7:45 P.M.
Robert Scott, 28535 Front Street, Temecula, stated he agrees that signs should not
be on sidewalks, but feels the ordinance will hinder businesses.
Mike O'Donnell, 29760 Rancho California Road, Temecula, representing Bob Newsom,
C-21 Newsom, read a letter Mr. Newsom addressed to the Council in opposition to the
proposed ordinance. In his letter, Mr. Newsom requested postponing the ordinance
until there are signs of an end to the recession.
Roni Graves, 31040 Via Norte, Temecula, stated that she was part of the ad-hoc
committee, however, on the day the ordinance was voted on, the three realtors on the
committee were not notified of the meeting. Ms. Graves stated that under the
circumstances of the current recession, adoption of the ordinance should be postponed
for a minimum of six months. When asked what she felt should be allowed, Ms.
Graves stated that A-Frame signs should be allowable. She added that the visibility
of the building was important when determining the allowable signage.
Gary Thornhill clarified that most of the banners and temporary signs in the City are
and have been illegal; however, this proposed ordinance allows signs that are not
CCMIN8/11192 -6- 912/92
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES AUGUST 11, 1992
allowed under the existing ordinance. City staff has not been enforcing the sign
ordinance at the direction of the City Council.
Kenneth McKee, 41900 Moreno Drive, Temecula, representing Motel 6, expressed
opposition to the time limits on the permit.
Costas St. John, 28690 Front Street, Temecula, stated that because the present
economic situation, all forms of advertisement should be allowed for a two year period.
William Hepburn, 31130 South General Kearney Road, Temecula, stated that he felt
the businesses need all the help they can get and suggested that the banners read
"Shop Temecula First".
Mike Thesing, 20391 Via Brisa, Temecula, concurred with the previously expressed
opposition to the ordinance.
Greg Treadwell, 27300 B. Jefferson, Temecula, expressed concern that the ordinance
will have negative impacts on the already unstable local business industry. Mr.
Treadwell added that if the ordinance is approved, all business should adhere to the
policy.
Mayor Birdsall declared a recess at 8:00 P.M. The meeting was reconvened at 8:15 P.M.
Bob Richardson, 29760 Rancho California Road, Temecula, stated that it was very
important to allow new business owners a fair chance to advertise their businesses.
Gary Bigge, 4525 Catelar Street, San Diego, representing Burger King, stated that a
lot of the local business are struggling in this recession, and it is his opinion that the
banners increase his business.
Lou Kashmere, 29115 Front Street, Temecula, suggested that the City hire a
consultant to draft a sign motif for use on banners.
Jim Futcher, 27625 Jefferson, Temecula, owner of two local Subway Sandwich
Shops, advised that he volunteered to serve on the ad-hoc committee. At the
meetings there was consensus to eliminate A-Frame signs, but not to eliminate
banners that are not affixed to buildings. Mr. Futcher added that he felt the ordinance
was appropriate.
Joan Tussing, owner of Fast Signs, advised that she served on the ad-hoc committee
and expressed her appreciation for the planning staff's consideration of the business
community. Ms. Tussing suggested a six month moratorium on enforcement to allow
the businesses to seek appropriate signage.
Carol Gamboni, 28535 Front Street, Temecula, expressed her opposition to the
ordinance.
CCMINB/11192 -7- 912/92
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES AUGUST 11, 1992
Councilmember Mur~oz stated that many of the signs are in the public right-of-way
which creates a liability for the City and these signs should be removed immediately.
He also agreed that signage should be addressed at project approval to ensure that
businesses are adecluately advertised by "kiosk" signs or marclues.
Councilmember Lindemans agreed that any sign in the public right-of-way is an
immediate hazard to the City and should be moved. Councilmember Lindemans
suggested a moratorium of one year, with signs in the public right-of-way and vehicle
mounted to be removed immediately.
Councilmember Moore stated that she felt the ordinance was very liberal.
Councilmember Parks stated he would like to see a six month delay on enforcement,
the sixty days of banner advertisement per year was not enough, and asked that staff
determine conditions where free-standing signs and banners could be allowed.
Councilmember Mufioz stated that he would agree to doubling the duration period for
banners.
City Attorney Scott Field advised the Council that he felt it is was important to take
action at this time on the ordinance.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Lindemans to
return this matter to staff with instructions to review and provide a grandfather
approval for existing signs for a period of six months and review the time limits
proposed; implement enforcement of the two restrictions on signs posted in the right-
of-way or vehicle mounted; and study and bring back a recommendation where free-
standing signs, A-Frame signs and banners may be used.
The motion was carried as follows:
AYES:
4 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Lindemans, Muftoz, Parks, Birdsall
NOES: I COUNCILMEMBERS: Moore
19.
Final Listina of Potentially Hazardous Buildinas
Tony Elmo presented the staff report.
Mayor Birdsall opened the public hearing at 9:30 P.M.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Lindemans to
continue the public hearing for Final Listing of Potentially Hazardous Buildings to
September 22, 1992. The motion was unanimously carried.
CCMINB/11192 -8- 912/92
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
COUNCIL BUSINESS
24.
AUGUST 11, 1992
Memorandum of Understanding Regarding Paloma Del Sol
City Attorney Scott Field presented the staff report.
It was moved by Councilmember Lindemans, seconded by Councilmember Moore to
approve the Amended Memorandum of Understanding ("MOU") regarding Paloma Del
Sol.
Councilmember Mu~oz expressed concern that this agreement had the potential for
possible litigation by to the County and opposed the agreement which he felt modified
the contract forever.
Councilmember Lindemans clarified that the contract was for a two year term.
Councilmember Parks stated that he supported the agreement which settles a potential
lawsuit with the developer and provides the City with a development agreement with
the local developer instead of with the County.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES:
4 COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
I COUNCILMEMBERS:
Lindemans, Moore, Parks, Birdsall
Muf~oz
25.
Consideration of Chamber of Commerce Contract Service Aoreement
Mary Jane Henry provided the staff report.
Doug Davies, 27450 Ynez Road, Temecula, representing the Temecula Valley Chamber
of Commerce, requested support for renewal of the contract.
Evelyn Harker, 31130 S. General Kearney, Temecula, encouraged the City Council to
support the contract agreement.
Councilmember Mur~oz stated that he objects to being asked to support activities
which are being done by two other organizations in the community and which appear
to be very generic to any Chamber.
It was moved by Councilmember Lindemans, seconded by Councilmember Parks to
approve funding in the amount of $46,000 to the Chamber of Commerce and to direct
the execution of the Chamber of Commerce Contract Service Agreement. The motion
was unanimously carried.
CCMINa/11/92 -9- 912192
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
23.
AUGUST 11, 1992
Emergency Management Proaram Presentation
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Moore to
continue the Emergency Management Program Presentation to the meeting of August
25, 1992. The motion was unanimously carried.
20. Temecula/Murrieta Transportation Committee
Tim Serlet provided the staff report.
Councilmember Parks stated that he believed the original intent of the committee was
to work on the freeway interchange; however, if there are other issues that the Council
would like addressed, he would request clear direction.
Councilmember Mu~oz stated that he saw the committee addressing several issues
regarding transportation.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Moore to
continue the operation of the Temecula/Murrieta Transportation Committee and using
the list of issues presented in the staff report, bring back in one month a prioritized list
of issues that the committee should address.
At 10:00 P.M. it was moved by Councilmember Mufioz, seconded by Councilmember Parks
to extend the meeting to 10:15 P.M. The motion was unanimously carried.
21. Discussion of Combining Traffic and TransBortation and Public Safety Commissions
Councilmember Lindemans stated that he brought this item before the Council because
he felt that the two Commissions could be combined to save on staff time, and to
make the commissions more viable. He suggested that the Councilmembers review
and perhaps question some of the Commissioners.
Councilmember Mu~oz said that he would hate to see the two commissions combined,
stating that he felt the Traffic and Transportation Commission had a lot of
responsibilities to keep their attention and added that he felt the Council was guilty of
not providing enough direction.
Mayor Birdsall indicated that she did not feel fiat disaster preparedness was a topic
for the Public Safety Commission and that a lot of other Cities handle this issue under
their Parks and Recreation Commission.
Chairman Ron Roberts of the Traffic and Transportation Commission advised that
although in the past the Commission had not been utilized to its fullest potential, the
Commission was now being adequately utilized. Chairman Roberts provided the
CCMIN811 1/92 -1 O- 912182
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES AUGUST 11o 1992
Council with the following list of issues that the Commission is presently working on:
Sub-Committee is working on regulating oversize permit loads.
* Providing inter-city bus service.
Implementing Dial-A-Ride.
* An addition of west bound through lane on Winchester Road.
Chairman Frank Klein of the Public Safety Commission addressed the Commission in
opposition to the proposed merger. Chairman Klein advised that Commissioner Ted
Goudy supported the merger of the two Commissions with the addition of two
Commissioners.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Lindemans to
continue this matter and direct staff to determine how the merger would be completed
and what areas the two Commissions do not overlap and bring this information back
in one month.
Ron Roberts,
The motion was unanimously carried.
22.
Appointment to Parks and Recreation Commission
It was moved by Councilmember Moore, seconded by Councilmember Lindemans to
continue the appointment to the Parks and Recreation Commission to the meeting of
August 25, 1992. The motion was unanimously carried.
CITY MANAGER REPORT
City Manager David Dixon advised the Council that the City has arranged for Inland Valley
Cable to air an earthquake preparedness program on Friday August 14, and Monday August
24, 6:00 P.M., Channel 24. He added that a Family Disaster Preparedness Plan would be
distributed to every home through the Bargain Bulletin on August 12.
CITY ATTORNEY REPORT
None
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
/,--
CCMIN811 1/92 -11 - 9/2/92
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES AUGUST 11, 1992
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Councilmember Lindemans, seconded by Councilmember Parks to adjourn
at 10:30 P.M. The next regular meeting of the Temecula City Council will be held on
Tuesday, August 25, 1992, 7:00 P.M. Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street,
Temecula.
Mayor Patricia H. Birdsall
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
CCMINB/11192 -12- 912192
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
HELD AUGUST 25, 1992
A regular meeting of the Temecula City Council was called to order at 7:00 P.M. in the
Temecula Community Center, 28818 Pujol Street, Temecula, California. Mayor Patricia H.
Birdsall presiding.
PRESENT: 5
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Lindemans, Moore, Mu~oz, Parks,
Birdsall
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Also present were City Manager David F. Dixon, City Attorney Scott C. Field, and
Administrative Secretary Susan Jones.
INVOCATION
The invocation was given by EIder Greg LeBlanc, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day
Saints.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The audience was led in the pledge of allegiance was led by Councilmember Moore.
PRESENTATIONS/
PROCLAMATIONS
No public comments were made.
PUBLIC FORUM
None
CONSENT CALENDAR
It was moved by Councilmember Moore, seconded by Councilmember Parks to approve
Consent Calendar Items No. I - 11. The motion was unanimously approved as follows:
AYES: 5
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Lindemans, Moore, Mur~oz, Parks,
Birdsall
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
CCMIN8/25192 - 1 * 9/1/92
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
1.
AUGUST 25, 1992
Standard Ordinance Adoption Procedure
1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions
included in the agenda.
Resolution ADoroving List of Demands
2.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 92-64
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
City Treasurer's Reoort as of June 30, 1992
3.1 Receive and file report.
Aooointment to Parks and Recreation Commission
4.1 Delay appointment until the meeting of October 13, 1992.
Set Hearing on Source Reduction and Recvclinca Element and Household Hazardous
Waste Element
5.1 Set a public hearing on the preliminary Source Reduction end Recycling
Element (SRRE), the Household Hazardous Waste Element (HHWE), and
a proposed Negative Declaration for October 13, 1992.
5.2 Direct the City Clerk to publish the Notice of Public Hearing.
Release of Faithful Performance Warranty Bond and Material and Labor Bond in Tract
No. 19872-1
6.1 Authorize the release of Faithful Performance Maintenance Bond for
street, water and sewer systems and the Material and Labor Bond in
Tract No. 19872-1.
e
6.2
Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
and the Developer.
Release of Faithful Performance Warranty Bond end Material end Labor Bond in Tract
No, 19872-2
7.1
Authorize the release of Faithful Performance Maintenance Bond for
CCMINBI25192 -2- 911192
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES AUGUST 25.1992
10.
11.
7.2
street, water and sewer systems and the Material and Labor Bond in
Tract No. 19872-2.
Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
and the Developer.
Release of Faithful Performance Warranty Bond and Material and Labor Bonds in Tract
No. 20848
8.1
8.2
Authorize the release of Faithful Performance Maintenance Bond for
street, water and sewer systems and the Material and Labor Bond in
Tract No. 20848.
Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
and the Developer.
Authorize Reduction in Bond Amounts in Tract Nos. 23220 and 24232
9.1
Authorize the reduction Street, Sewer and Water Faithful Performance
Bond amounts.
9.2 Approve the Subdivision Improvement Agreements and 18-month
extension of time.
9.3
9.4
Accept the Faithful Performance Bond riders in the reduced amounts, all
in Tract No.'s 23220 and 24232.
Direct the City Clerk to so notify the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors.
Vesting Final Tract MaD No. 25004-1
10.1 Approve Vesting Final Tract Map No. 25004-1, subject to the
Conditions of Approval.
Advance for Construction of Margarita Road Extension Interim Imnrovements (Project
No. PW 92-04)
11.1
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Approve the advance of $562,650 from the General Fund Revolving
Fund to the Redevelopment Agency (RDA) for the construction of
Margarita Road Extension Interim Improvements.
12.
Abatement of Hazardous Vegetation from Vacant Lots or Parcels as oer Ordinance 91 -
18. Chapter 6.16
CCMINBI25/92 -3- 911192
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES AUGUST 25, 1992
Chief Building Official Tony Elmo presented the staff report.
It was moved by Councilmember Moore, seconded by Councilmember Mu~oz to adopt
a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 92-65
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ORDERING
CONFIRMATION OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AGAINST PARCELS OF LAND WITHIN
THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR COSTS OF ABATEMENT AND REMOVAL OF
HAZARDOUS WEEDS
The motion was unanimously approved as follows:
AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: 0
Lindemans, Moore, Mur~oz, Parks,
Birdsall
COUNCILMEMBERS: None
13.
Vesting Tentative Tract MaD 25320 and Zone Change No. 5631
It was moved by Councilmember Moore, seconded by Councilmember Mu~oz to
Continue Change of Zone No. 5631 and Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 25320 to
September 8, 1992.
The motion was unanimously approved as follows:
AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Lindemans, Moore, Muf~oz, Parks,
Birdsall
NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
COUNCIL BUSINESS
14.
CCMINB/25192
Eagle Mountain Landfill Project
Joe Hreha presented the staff report.
Councilmember Muf~oz suggested that Mine Reclamation Company be invited to give
a presentation and provide a question and answer forum.
City Manager David Dixon advised that Cable Channel 24 offers an on-going
presentation on the project.
-4.- ellis2
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES AUGUST 25, 1992
Joe Hreha added that he could arrange a tour of the facility.
Mayor Birdsall asked that the cable channel program schedule for airing the Eagle
Mountain presentation be provided to the Councilmembers.
It was moved by Councilmember Moore, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans to
recommend through the Western Riverside Council of Government's Executive
Committee representative, support of an Eagle Mountain condition that the revenues
to the County from the Eagle Mountain project be distributed 100% between the
County and all of its cities based upon population or another fair and equitable
distribution developed to the satisfaction of Riverside County and all of its cities.
The motion was unanimously approved as follows:
AYES: 5
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Lindemans, Moore, Mur~oz, Parks,
Birdsall
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
15.
Designation of Voting Delegate League Annual Conference
It was moved by Councilmember Moore, seconded by Councilmember Mur~oz to
designate Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans as voting delegate and Counciimember Parks as
alternate, to represent the City of Temecula at the Annual League of California Cities
Conference Business Meeting.
The motion was unanimously approved as follows:
AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Lindemans, Moore, Mufioz, Parks,
Birdsall
NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
16.
Appointments to Development Code Advisory Committee
Gary Thornhill presented the staff report.
Councilmember Parks suggested that the five appointees be people who work in the
industry and deal with the codes.
Counciimember Moore stated that she would be appointing Larry Markham of Markham
and Associates, who has agreed to serve on the committee.
Mayor Birdsall suggested Councilmember Parks as the Council representative.
CCMIN8/25192 -5- 911
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES AUGUST 25, 1992
Councilmember Parks deferred the recommendation to Councilmember Mu~oz who
accepted the appointment.
Mayor Birdsall asked that the Councilmembers submit their recommendations for the
five members-at-large to Gary Thornhill by the end of the week.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Lindemans to
appoint Councilmember Mu~oz to the Development Code Advisory Committee.
The motion was unanimously approved as follows:
AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Lindemans, Moore, Mu~oz, Parks,
Birdsall
NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
17.
General Plan Contract Amendment for Comdetion of Development Code
Gary Thornhill presented the staff report.
It was moved by Councilmember Moore, seconded by Councilmember Lindemans to
amend the General Plan Contract by $26,405 for the completion of the Development
Code.
The motion was unanimously approved as follows:
AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Lindemens, Moore, Muf~oz, Parks,
Birdsall
NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Mayor Birdsall declared a recess at 7:45. The meeting reconvened at 9:00 P.M.
18. Emeroencv Manaoement Presentation
City Manager David Dixon presented the staff report providing an overview of the
City's emergency management plan and disaster preparedness program. Mr. Dixon
stressed the importance of education, preparation and practice.
Counciimember Lindemans suggested that the French Valley Airport be a possible
evacuation center, with supplies stored in a hangar at that location.
City Manager Dixon stated that staff will look into the suggestion, however, it will
CCMINa/2ti/92 -6- 911192
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES AUGUST 25.1992
require traveling, and staff would prefer to encourage people not to travel during
disasters.
Mayor Birdsall questioned the feasibility of placing a cellular phone at the radio station
to be used in the event of a major emergency or disaster.
Joe Hreha advised that staff is working with the local radio station and have
established a password system, as well as an emergency bypass of the Emergency
Broadcast System on Inland Valley Cable System. A Disaster Case Radio is in place
at Station 73 and 800 mega hertz radios are currently on line.
DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS
None
CITY MANAGER REPORT
City Manager David Dixon advised that there is a General Plan Town Meeting Monday, August
31, 1992, 7:00 P.M. at the public library, to provide an overview of what the plan is. Mr.
Dixon briefly discussed some of the general plan issues and encouraged the public to become
involved and attend the meeting to better understand the issues facing the City Council.
CITY ATTORNEY REPORT
None
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Councilmember Mur~oz advised that there is a volunteer group working with the United Way
in order to secure funding in the amount of $18,000 to address transportation needs in
Murrieta and Temecula, and this group is proposing to ask the City for matching funds to
purchase a Dial-A-Road services in Temecula.
Mayor Birdsall advised that she had been contacted by the Mayor of Riverside requesting the
City of Temecula participate, along with other southwest cities, in the County's Centennial
parade with a float. Mayor Birdsall asked that this item be placed on an agenda for
discussion.
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Moore to adjourn at
CCMIN8126192 -7- 911
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES AUGUST 25. 1992
9:45 P.M. to a joint meeting of the City of Temecula Planning Commission and the City
Council on Thursday, September 3, 1992, 6:00 P.M., Main Conference Room, City Hall,
43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
The next regular meeting of the City Council will be held on September 8, 1992, 7:00 P.M.,
Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California.
ATTEST:
Mayor Patricia H. Birdsall
June S. Greek, City Clerk
CCMIN8/25192 -8- 911192
ITEM
NO.
3
RESOLUTION NO. 92
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN
CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN
EXHIBIT A
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE,
DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A have been
audited by the City Manager, and that the same are hereby allowed in the mount of
$634,001.16
SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution.
AlPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 8th day of September, 1992.
ATTEST:
Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
3/Re,ol 270
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, HEREBY DO CERTIFY that the
foregoing Resolution No. 92- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the
City of Temecula on the 8th day of September, 1992 by the following roll call vote.
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
NOES:
0 COUNCiLMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCiLMEMBERS: None
June S. Greek, City Clerk
3/Re~ol 270 '~
CITY OF TEMECULA
LIST OF DEMANDS
08/20/92 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
08/27/92 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
09/08/92 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
08/27/92 TOTAL PAYROLL:
TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 09/08/92 COUNCIL MEETING:
$12,507.64
$432.896.72
$101,102.35
$87,494.45
$634,001.16
DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND:
CHECKS:
001
100
110
190
191
193
210
250
300
310
320
330
GENERAL
GAS TAX FUND
RANCHO CALIF. RD. REIMB.
TCSD
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
CAPITAL PROJECTS (TCSD)
INSURANCE FUND
VEHICLE FUND
INFORMATIONS SYSTEMS
COPY CENTER FUND
PAYROLL:
001
100
190
300
320
330
GENERAL (PAYROLL)
GAS TAX FUND (PAYROLL)
TCSD (PAYROLL)
INSURANCE FUND
INFORMATION SYSTEMS (PAYROLL)
COPY CENTER FUND (PAYROLL)
$134,581.87
$48,567,26
$255,225.60
$14.906.56
$125.95
$1,594.20
$63,224,93
$1,500.00
$697.94
$89.96
$16,260,04
$9,732.40
$55,314.76
$9,307.77
$19,963.66
$561.63
$999.76
$1,346.67
$546,506.71
$87,494.45
TOTAL BY FUND:
$634,001.16
PREPARED BY KARMA MCINTYRE
DAVID DIXON, 'CITY MANAGER
,HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
CZT".; OF TEKEC~L~
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECX" CHECK ~NBOR VENDOR ....... ITEm' " ACCOUNT
NUMBER DATE NU~)ER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER
iTE)I
AMOUNT A~OUNT
11515 08117R2 000262 RANCHO WATER ....... IRRIBAIION PLAN CHECK S 250-190-12~-5B02
1,500.00 1.500.00
11521 08/20/92 HARVEY~ BERNADETTE
11522 08/20/V2 DEL CASTILLD, ANEELINA
"11S~S'OB/20/92 ....... DI~RICH70D~A'
REFUND/TENNIS
REFUND/SWI!4HINB
190-185-4811
!90-185-4810
REF1J~/'HORS~ANSHIP ...... 190-I85-4818
26.00
20.00 20.00
100.00 100.00
11524 08/20/92 000127 CALIFORNIAN
"!1524'08120R2'00012T'CAL1FORNIAN
11524 08120/92 000127 CALIFORNIAN
11524 08/20/92 000127 CALIFORNIAN
11525 08120192 000151 CARL WARREN & CO.
LEBAL ADVERTISINB FY 92 001-120-999-5256
LEBAL'tDVEl~TISINB'FIF'92"l)OFI20=B99=5256
LBAL ADVERTISINB FY 92 001-120-999-5256
LEBAL ADVERTISINB FY 92 001-I20-999-5256
PERCUCHETTI, CLAIN 300-199-999-5205
41.04
1!9:16 ........
~1.75
6,58 198.53
407.25 407.25
'1112FOB720'I92'OOfi55")A~'IN
AUDI~IVIDEO'PRODUCTIDN'OOFIO0;99F;5250
700:00 ...... 700.00 '
11527 08/20/92 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT 995~22; CDHPUTER PAPER
'L~527'OB~20/V2'OOOi77"BLENNIES"DRrICE'pRDDUCT'TAX
11527 08120/92 000177 BLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT CARTRID6E! 92295A! TONE
11527 08/20/V2 000177 6LENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT TAX
'I'1t27"OBI2019TOOOI77"BLENNIEFOr"T'iCE 'PRODU,CT"FILE7 ECONONY
11527 08/20/92 000177 6LENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT ENVELOPES
11527 08/20/92 000177 6LENNIE8 OFFICE PRODUCT DISCOUNT
"1152T'OBI20/92"OOOI77'BLENNIES'OFFICE'PRODUCT' TAX
11527 08/20192 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT H2-405-7 LETTER SIZE 12
11527 08120/92 000177 6LENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT PROFESSIONAL PADFOLIO
'I1527"O81207V2'~O01'77'GL'ENNIEFOFFICE"PRODUCT"TAX
001-140-999-5220 104,85
001:140-999-5220 ................ 8;15 '
001-140-999-5220 89.95
001-!40-999-5220 6.97
00I'140-999-5220 .......... 41.&l .......
00!-140-999-5220 9,00 "'
001-140-999-5220 10,40-
001-140-999-5220 ~.12
190-180-999-5220 ~,99
190-180-999-5220 9.66
'190:180:999-5220 ~;~B ......... ~OO~2B .......
11528 08120/92 000192 6LOBAL CONPUTER SUPPL!E C3251 DUST BLASTER II R
"I1528'09/20/92"'000192" GLODAL'CONPUTER'SUPPLIE"FREIGHT"
11528 08/20192 000192 6LOBAL CONPUTER SUPPLIE TAX
520-199-999-5221 54.00
320-199~999-5221 ................. 6:66
~20-!99-99~-5221 4,47
65.1~
"~1529'08720/92'00019T'IC~'
.... 92'HUNICIPAE'YEAR BOOK .... 00F150:999-5228 ......... 82.50 .... 82.50 '
11550 08/20/92 000195
"'11530" 08/20/92" 000195
ASCON HASLER, NAILINS SY
ASCON HASLER NAILINS SY
1010L SCALE/7118192-71 530-199-999-5581 110.00
9610T~5/'08101-101~1 '* 530-199-999-5581 IBB.25 298.25
11531 08/20/92 000206
11531'08/20192'00020F
11531 08/20/92 000206
11532 08120/92 000218
KINKO'S COPIES
lINEO'S'COPIES '
KINKO'S CO~T=
OPEN ACCOUNT!STOCK AS N 530-!99-999-5590
'OPEFACCOUNTiSTO;E AS N' ~0;199-999-5590
OPEN ACCOUNT!STOCK AS N 550-199-999-5590
~ARILYN'S COFFEE SERVIC"CO~EE*'SERVICEFCITY'HA"O01:199-999-5250
4.si
19.2l
72,86
27.26
72,86
11555 08/20/92 000226
"11555' 08/20/92' '000226'
;.~ 08/20!~2 00022&
11555 08/20/92 000226
"'~' 08/20/92 000226
11533 08/20/92 00022~
HICRO A6E COHPUTER CENT APBO05; AHERZCAN POWER 520-199-99%5605
KICRD'ABE CDNPUlER CENT"'UPS'i250 ........... ~20-199-999-5605
NICRO ACE COMPUTER CENT TAX 320-I~9-999-5605
MICRO ABE COMPUTER CENT APCI-60105 TELECO~ 520-199-99%5&05
."tICRO ABE COMPUTER CENT TAX 520-I~9-9~9-5~05
HICRO AGE COHPUTER CENT CREDIT, ITE~ RETURNED 52~199-999-5605
61,00
487.00
42.49
557,00
· 41,62
52L75-
644.~5
VOUCHRc, ' .....~
06/20/~2 i8=02
CITY OF TEHECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR "'
.~ PERIODS
~VOUCHER/
CHECK" CHECK VENDOR VENDOR
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME
............... ITE~ ................. A"'OUt~
DESCRIPTION NUMBER
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
'11534' 08120192 000249 PEllY CASH
11534 08/20/92 000249 PETTY CASH
115~ 08/20/92 000249 PETTY CASH
"11534' 08/20/92' 000249 PET~ CASH
11554 08/20/92 000249 PETTY CASH
11534 09/20/92 000249 PETI'Y CASH
.... 11534' 08/20/92 000249 PETI'Y CASH
11534 08/20/92 000249 PETTY CASH
11534 08/20/92 000249 PETTY CASH
.... 11534" 08/20/92" O00249"PETI'Y CASH '
11534 08/20/92 000249 PETTY CASH
..... CASH REIHB. JULY 92
CASH REIN. JULY 92
CASH REIN. JULY 92
............ CASH REIHB;"JULY'
CASH REIHB. JULY 92
£ASH REIMB. JULY 92
CASH REIMB;"IULY
CASH REIMB. JULY 92
CASH REINS. JULY 92
CASH'RE1MG."JULY'92"OOF!IO-999-5665
CASH REINS. JULY 92 00!-120-999-5220
001-163-999-5220 38.41
00!-140-9~9-5220 10.72
00!-163-99~-5258 ,n O0
001-140-999-52&0 2~.3~
001-162-~99-5220 56.35
00!-150-999'52&0 20.00
320-199-999-5220 ................. 13.17
001-150-999-5220 23.65
001-161-999-5n,.?.0 40,49
30.49
42,73
309.40
"'1!535"08120/~2'000255" PRO LOC['&"[OEY
'OPt'ACCOUNT FOR MI5C;"'190-180-999-5212
.... 55,70 ........ 55,70 "'
11536 08/20/92 000260 RAN-TEC RUBBER STAMP HF APPROVAL STAMPdELF INK 001-162-999-5220
--l~3r~B~2~2-~2~-RAN~TEC-RU~BER~TAMP~r-NAME~ADGE~JU~E-~REE~C-~F12~l99-522~-
11536 08/20/92 000260 RAN-TEC RUBBER STAMP MF IDEAL STAMP CHAN6E)BUL[ 001-140-999-5~0
11536 08120192 000260 RAN-TEC RUBBER STAMP MF TAX 001-162-999-5220
I151&"OB120'!92'OOO2&F'RAN;TEC RUBBER'STI~'IP'ffir"TAX 001;120:999:5220
11536 08/20/92 000260 RAN-TEC RUBBER STAMP NF TAX 001-140-999-5220
40,00
2;50
8.00
3.10
.62
54,41
'~'1'15~' 08/20/92"000262" RANCHD1ATER' Ol-~-:7OOOI-Z
11537 09/20/92 000262 RANCHO WATER 01-11-70002-2
11537 08/20R2 000262 RANCHO WATER 01-1!-70009-2
"115~'08/20/92 '000262 RANCHO WATER 01-!F70003;2
11537 08120R2 000262 RANCHO NATER 011-11-70250-2
115~7 08/20/92 000262 RANCHO WATER 01-11-70405-I
I93;190-99~-~240 ........... 117.71 .........
19~-IB0-999-5240 114,28
193-180-999-5240 219,57
193-B0-999-5240 ....... 120.16 ........
193-180-999-5240 360.58
193-190-999-5240 91,15 1~023.75
11538 08/20R2 000266 RIGHTNAY
CLEANING FEE FOR GRAFFI 190-180.-999-5238
85,00 85.00
.... t1539"09120/92 '000283' SECURITY PACIFIC'NATION'IN*TOWN'NEETINGFJULY' 9"001:16~-999'525E ................ 46.14
46.14
11540 08120/92 000295 SIR SPEEDY
11540 "08120192 "000285 ' SIR'SPEEDY
11540 08/20/92 000285 SIR SPEEDY
11540 08/20/92 000285 SIR SPEEDY
11541 08/20/92 000291
11541 08/20/92 000291
11542 0B/20/92 000307
11542 08/20/92 000307
.... i1542"08/20/92 000307
SPEE DEE OIL CHAN6E & T
SPEE DEE OIL CHANGE & T
TEMECULA TROPHY
TEMECULA TROPHY
TEHECULA TROPHY
500 BUSINESS CARDSIFOIL- 001-162-9t9-5220
"TAX ......... 001-162-999-5220 .......
CASH RECEIPTS STARTING 001-140-999-5220
TAX 001-140-999-5220
REPAIR & NAINTENANCE;VE
REPAIR & MAINTENANCE!VE
310-164-999-5214
310-180-999-5214
1ST PLACE PLAQUES W/CLD 190-183-9~2-5300
2NO PUICE PLAQUES !90-!83-q~2-5300
TAX 190-18;-932-5300
56.00
2,79 ......
438.42
53,98 511.19
22,49
22.49 44.98
i19.85
~6.85
1&.01 221.71
11543 08/20/92 000335 WESTERN CITY NASAIINE JOB ANNOUNCEMENT FOR AS
11544 08/20/92 000340 WHITE CAP ROLLS; CAUTION TAPE;
11544 08/20/92 000340 NHITE CAP TAX
11545 0BI20/92 000346 YATES, GRANT N~ASC CONFERENCE
00!-150-999-5254 463.50
001-162-99%~242 49.92
001-162-999-5242 3.87
001-!40-999-525B 142.80
46~.50
53.79
142.B0
........ ::'. :ZT~' 5F TE~EG~LA FAiR
I}8/20/92 16:I}2 VOUC~ER/CHECE ~IETER
fO~ ALL PERIQQS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITE~ ACCOUNT ITEM CHE~K
NUHBER DATE NUMBER NAHE DESCRIPTION N~BER AHOUNT AMOUNT
*- 1!54~ 08120/92 000364 SREE[;'~UE S. SUNSHINE FUND 00>2170 3~.95 38.95
11547 08120192 000574 SOUTHERN CAL!F EDISON 57-77-565-&802-03 193-1B0-999-5240 11.71
'I1547' 0B1201~2 00057~ SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON ' 59-77-416~00B0-02 ..... 19!~180-999-5500 125.95
11547 08/20R2 000574 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 59-77-799-2338-05 193-180-999-5240 11.71
11547 0B/20192 0C0374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 59-77-799-3303-01 !V3-1BO-999-5240 !1.71
'11547 ° 08120/~2 000;74 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 60-77-411-0011-02" 193-18~-~9-5240 11.20
11547 08/20/92 00~374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 60-77-411-0255-05 193-1~0-999-5240 11.32
11547 0G/20/92 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 60-77-41-1093-03 190-180-999-5240 11.20
"'115~7 °'0SI20192'~ 0005'/4 SOUTERN CAUF EDISON .... ~0-77-411-109~-05 ........ 18~180-99~-5240 ...... 11.20
11547 08/20/92 000574 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 60-77-411-1095-03 193-180-999-5240 11.20
11547 08/20/~2 000574 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 60-77-411-7644-02 195-180-999-5240 11.20
11547' 08120R2' 000;74 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON ' 60-77-411~7670'03 ..... 19F180-~9-5240 ............... 11.20 ....... 23~.60
11548 08/20/92 000~75 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 7145493437/3ULY 92 001-161-999-5208
-1154~-~2~tT~..~5-SOUTHER~CAL-~ELEPH~N-~.~1.4~4~45G/-3UT-T.~2-.-~F14~;9~9-52~ ....
11548 08120192 000575 SOUTHERN CALIF IELEPHDN 71454934391 gULY ~2 001-120-909-520B
11548 08/20/92 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 7142974840i aULY 92 001-143-999-5209
'l1549'O8~2~/t2"*O00575'SOUTHERN"CALIF*TELEPHON'3231559/'aULY'~2 ........ 00F110-9~9-5208
1154B 08/20/92 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 7143457425/JULY 92
11548 08120/92 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 7145493436/3ULY 92
11549 08/20/92 000426 RANCHO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL FRESH AND CLEAN
11549 08120192 000426 RANCHO INDUSTRIAL StJPPL LEMONCIDE
"II54f'OSI20/g2'OOO42&"RANCHO'INDUSTRIAE SUPP["'SPRATSOLVE 1154~ 09/20R2 000426 RANCHO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL MISTOLIN
11549 08/20R2 000426 RANCHO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL CLEARTEX GLASS CLEANER
"1154~'09/20R2 "OO0425'RANCHO'1HDUSTRIAE'SUPP['9ON['CLEANER' 11549 08120192 00042& RANCNO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL GLOVE LATEX
11549 0B120/92 000426 RANCHO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL SQUEEGEE MINDON CLEANER
"I1549'08120192 "'O0042&"RANCHO'INDUSTRIAL SUPPL "TA~'
11549 08/20/92 000426 RANCHO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL SCOB6 SANITHIRE COMM.UP
11549 08120192 000426 RANCHO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL MOP HANDLE
"~I59~"'09120I~2"000426" RANCHO"INDUSTRIAL'SUPPL" COTTO~ HOP HEAD .....
11549 08/20/92 000426 RANCHO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL RAYON MOP HEAD
1!549 081201q2 000426 RANCHO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL BUC[ET NIR]NGER
~1549' 08/20R2 000426' RANCHO'INDUSTRIAL"SUPPL'PORTABLE TRASH'CAN N/BA'
11549 08/20R2 000426 RANCHO INDUSTRIAL SOPPL BROON
11549 08/20/92 000426 RANCHO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL DUSTPAN
.... 1~54~' 06/20/92' 000426' RANCHD'INDUSTRIAL SUPPL' DUSTER
1!549 06/20R2 000426 RANCHO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL TOILET BRUSH
z1549 08/20R2 000426 RANCHO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL SOUEEGEE !2'
"'!1549 '06/20R2'000426" RANCHO'INDUSTRIACSUPP[' COUNTER BRUSH .......... 11549 08/20192 000426 RANCHO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL I0 SPONGES|
11549 08120/92 000426 RANCHO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL SPONGE; LARGE; YELLON
'11549 '08/20R2 'O00426'RANCHO'INDUSTRIAL SUPPE*'SPRAY'BOTTLES .......
11549 08/20/92 00042& RANCHO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL TONELEt 12 EA,
11549 08/20R2 000426 RANCHO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL TAX
I~550 08!20/92 0004~4 SIERRA COHPUTER SYSTEMS PERMIT SOFTMARE PACKAGE
001-110-999-5209
001-!65-999-520B
001-199-999-5250
001-199-999-5250
00~-199-999-5250'
001-199-999-5250
001-199-999-5250
--001=I99;999-5250''-
001-199-999-5250
001-199-99~-5250
001-!99-999-5250
001-199-999-5250
001-199-999-5250
'001-199-999-5250'"
001-199-999-5250
001-199-999-5250
001-199-999-5250
001-199-999-5250
001-199-999-5250
001-!99-9~-5250'
001-1t%99~-5250
001-19%999-5250
001:199-999-5250
001-199-9~9-5250
001-199-999-5250
001-199-~99-5250"
00!-199-999-5250
00~-!9~-~-5250
001-162-999-5660
125.88
90.75
38.25
151,20
74.00
46.01
6.99
6.99
5,99
10,99
3.99
3,78
5.29
3.76
240,00
U,24
' 6~8S
9,44
43,99
74.70
18.99
6,32
'4,20
1,99
10.79
6,58
5.99
2.50
"7,96
5.40
35.41
682.50
575.40
544.6L..
682,50
0L'20/'.-.'2 t~,:C'2 VGUCH, ER/CHE[;t: F,E.'.-:~TEE
F'~, ALL PERIODS
~._Z~'OUC, HER/
tEC[ "CHECK' VERBDR "V:v1:~:' " ITE.~ At'tO:"rr
hU.~BER DATE :iUMBEF'. NAME DESCRIPTION HU.~BEF:
"' 11551 08/20!92 000443 ROBERT HALFIACCOUNTEMPS' iEMP.SERVICE~ FINANCE U 001-140-~-511S
115i2 08/20192 000470 GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFi
11553 OS/20/92 000425 BARGAIN BULLETIN
11553 08/20/92 000485 BARGAIN BULLETIN
11554 05/20/92 000492 HENRY, MARY JANE
ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP 92-95 001-140-97~.-5226
15,528 BROCHURES ON 00!-110-79%5257
TAX 00!-i10-9~,9-5257
CSMFD MEETING 001-140-999-5255
1!555'0B/20/~2 "O00494"MANNING ~SINEERING .... CONSULTING'ENGINEER FOR 001-145-97V-5250
11556 05,'20!92 000495 ACT 1 TEMPORARY HELP
...... L1556"'08120192 000495 ACT 1 .................. TEMPORARY HELP .....
190-180'999-5118
!90-!80-V~9-5118 *
11557 08/20192 000507 EVERYTHING FOR WINDOWS DEPOSIT FOR CURTAINS/CO 001-199-9t9-5242
11~58 08/20/92 000514 C9M GUIDEBOOK, PARTNERINS 001-163-V~9-5228
.... "I'1559'0B/20/':/2 "000516' PRENTICE'HALC;'INC':" ..... LIFETIME'ENCYCLOPEDIA' 'OOFISO-999-B22B "'
iTEE
AHDUNT
170,00
25q.40
20.10
18.00
300.00
31!.86
402.40
725.!5
10.00
....... 40,85'
I 70
279.50
1LO0
300.00
714.26
725.15
10.00
40.85
TOTA['C1.IECk'S
'12,507.64"'
..... ~ TE~EC~L~
VOUg~ER/C~ECX ~E~ISTER
FO~ ALL PERIODS
FUND TITLE ' AMOUNT
001
1o,!
' 250
300
310
..... 520"
BENERAL FUND 6,~75.20
COHHUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT I~2V3.10
TCSD ZONE A 125.~5
TCSD ZONE C 1,115.00
CAPITAL PROJECTS - TCSO 1,500.00 "
INSURANCE FUND 407.25
VEHICLES FUND 44.98
INFDRIIATIDN SYSTENS .................. 722.&5 ..........
COPY CENTER FUND ~25.51
TOTAL' .......................
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA
08/27/92 16:33 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
""' FOR ALL PERIOOS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER
ITEM CHECK
AMOUNT AMOUNT
11562 08/21/19 000522 MOTOR SPORTS SQUARE SERVICE/MAINT. ON MOTOR 001-2020
2,881.31 2,881.31
11566 08/25/92 000237 OLIVER BROTHERS
11566 08/25/92 000237 OLIVER BROTHERS
CONSTRUCTION OF STREET, 110-165-605-5804
CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER # 110-165-605-5804
237,954.91
17,270.69 255,225.60
11568 08/27/92 000483 INLAND ASPHALT & COATIN CONSTRUCTION OF S[DEWAL 210-165-607-5804
63,224.93 63,224.93
613724 08/27/92 000444 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT 000444 CAIT 001-2070
613724 08/27/92 000444 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT 000444 CAIT 100-2070
613724 08/27/92 000444 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT 000444 CAIT 190-2070
613724 08/27/92 000444 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT 000444 CAIT 300-2070
613724 08/27/92 000444 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT 000444 CAIT 320-2070
613724 08/27/92 000444 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT 000444 CAIT 330-2070
613724 08/27/92 000444 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT 000444 SDI 001-2070
613724 08/27/92 000444 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT 000444 SDI 100-2070
613724 08/27/92 000444 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT 000444 SDI 190-2070
613724 08/27/92 000444 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT 000444 SDI 300-2070
613724 08/27/92 000444 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT 000444 SDI 320-2070
613724 08/27/92 000444 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT 000444 SDI 330-2070
1,893.67
301.42
419.20
17.01
43.57
12.80
586.53
103.23
239.52
8.44
16.08
18.48
3,659.95
646702 08/27/92 000283 SECURITY PACIFIC NATION 000283 FICA/MED 001-2070
646702 08/27/92 000283 SECURITY PACIFIC NATION 000283 FICA/MED 100-2070
"'5702 08/27/92 000283 SECURITY PACIFIC NATION 000283 FICA/MED 190-2070
.6702 08/27/92 000283 SECURITY PACIFIC NATION 000283 FICA/MED 300-2070
646702 08/27/92 000283 SECURITY PACIFIC NATION 000283 FICA/MED 320-2070
646702 08/27/92 000283 SECURITY PACIFIC NATION 000283 FICA/MED 330-2070
646702 08/27/92 000283 SECURITY PACIFIC NATION 000283 USIT 001-2070
646702 08/27/92 000283 SECURITY PACIFIC NATION 000283 USIT 100-2070
646702 08/27/92 000283 SECURITY PACIFIC NATION 000283 USIT 190-2070
646702 08/27/92 000283 SECURITY PACIFIC NATION 000283 USIT 300-2070
646702 08/27/92 000283 SECURITY PACIFIC NATION 000283 USIT 320-2070
646702 08/27/92 000283 SECURITY PACIFIC NATION 000283 USlT 330-2070
1,966.61
333.71
686.66
19.58
37.30
42.88
8,261.72
1,433.79
2,248.46
76.14
208.34
71.77
15,386.96
11574 08/27/92 DIAMOND, BARBARA REFUND/DOG DAY 190-183-4949
3.00
3.00
11575 08/27/92 TANNA, DIANE REFUND/DAY CAMP 190-183-4809
62.50
62.50
11576 08/27/92
AMERICAN MINI-STORAGE REFUND/DUPLICATE BUS. L 001-199-4056
35.00
35.00
11577 08/27/92 TALLY, VALERIE REFUND/DAY CAMP 190-183-4809
145.00
145.00
11578 08/27/92 000100 ALLIED BARRICADE CONPAN EMERGENCY SIGN SUPPLIES 100-164-999-5244
34.48
34.48
11579 08/27/92 000107 ALHAMBRA GROUP
CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PL 100-164-999-5248
467.74
467.74
11580 08/27/92 000120 BICKNELL TRAVEL CENTER GFOA SEMINAR/GRANT YATE 001-140-999-5258
188.00
188.00
11581 08/27/92 000155 DAVLIN
AUDIO/VIDEO PRUDUCTION 001-161-999-5250
150.00
150.00
11582 08/27/92 000162 EGGHEAD DISCOUNT SOFTWA WORDPERFECT UPGRADE FOR 320-199-999-5221 79.00
~1582 08/27/92 000162 EGGHEAD DISCOUNT SOFTWA FREIGHT 320-199-999-5221 8.50
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA
08/27/92 16:33 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
3
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AHOUNT
11582 08/27/92 000162 EGGHEAD DISCOUNT SOFTWA TAX 320-199-999-5221
6.13
93.63
11583 08/27/92 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT C4-35720; ADDING MACHIM 190-180-999-5220
11583 08/27/92 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT TAX 190-180-999-5220
11583 08/27/92 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT B2-62029 BLUE HANGING B 001-140-999-5220
11583 08/27/92 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT TAX 001-140-999-5220
11583 08/27/92 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT NARROW RULED, NOR MARGI 190-180-999-5220
11583 08/27/92 000177 GLENNZES OFFICE PRODUCT DISCOUNT 190-180-999-5220
11583 08/27/92 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT TAX 190-180-999-5220
11583 08/27/92 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT 6A-53-TD-909 REINFORCEM 001-162-999-5220
11583 08/27/92 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT 6A-D3-35673 001-162-999-5220
11583 08/27/92 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT 6A-RB-810-3412 MAGIC TA 001-162-999-5220
11583 08/27/92 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT 6A-PA-33311 PAPERMATE N 001-162-999-5220
11583 08/27/92 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT 6A-PS-C242H ROLOOEX FIL 001-162-999-5220
11583 08/27/92 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT 6A-BC-MS11-BE BIC PENS 001-162-999-5220
11583 08/27/92 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT 6A-BC-MS11-BK BIC PENS 001-162-999-5220
11583 08/27/92 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT 6A-F1-153L FILE LTR SIZ 001-162-999-5220
11583 08/27/92 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT 6A-J3-3MO0 CALENDAR BAS 001-162-999-5220
11583 08/27/92 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT 6A-D3-654-YW 3" X 3" PA 001-162-999-5220
11583 08/27/92 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT 6A-M3-37890 9 X 12 ENVE 001-162-999-5220
11583 08/27/92 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT 6A-R8-810-B1 FREE DISPE 001-162-999-5220
11583 08/27/92 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT 6A-S3FF-3G GREEN FILE L 001-162-999-5220
11583 08/27/92 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT 001-162-999-5220
11583 08/27/92 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT TAX 001-162-999-5220
13.02
1.01
92.00
7.13
4.95
1.23-
.29
1.51
7.74
1.85
1.19
.95
2.09
2.09
19.00
5.40
7.08
5.80
10.14
1.89
,38-
5.14
11584 08/27/92 000193 ICMA
11584 08/27/92 000193 ICMA
PURCHASE BOOK ON SERV. 001-100-999-5228
PURCHASE ICMA BOOK 001-110-999-5228
48.50
59.50
108.00
11585 08/27/92 000194 ICMA RETIREMENT RETIREMENT DEPOSIT AUG, 001-2080
11585 08/27/92 000194 ICMA RETIREMENT RETIREMENT DEPOSIT AUG, 100-2080
11585 08/27/92 000194 ICMA RETIREMENT RETIREMENT DEPOSIT AUG. 190-2080
11585 08/27/92 000194 ICNA RETIREMENT RETIREMENT DEPOSIT AUG. 320-2080
11585 08/27/92 000194 ICNA RETIREMENT RETIREMENT DEPOSIT AUG. 330-Z080
11585 08/27/92 000194 ICMA RETIREMENT RETIREMENT DEPOSIT AUG. 300-2080
10,029.25
431,57
1,702.86
462.02
326.29
75.55
13,027.54
11586 08/27/92 000195 ASCOM NASLER MAILING SY REPLENZSH POSTAGE
330-199-999-5230
4,000.00
4,000,00
11587 08/27/92 000196 INLAND CALL AMERICA 0716944348/07/18-08/17 320-199-999-5208
1,996.24
1,996.24
11588 08/27/92 000206 KINKO'S COPIES
OPEN ACCOUNT;STOCK AS N 330-199-999-5590
21.44
21.44
11589 08/27/92 000213 LOCAL GOVERNMENT CONHIS PLANNXNG LIBRARY
001-161-999-5228
3.50
3.50
11590 08/27/92 000240 ORANGE COUNTY STRIPING 6 LEGENDS 100-164-999-5410
Q95.00
995.00
11591 08/27/92 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 PER REDE 001-2130
11591 08/27/92 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 PER REDE 100-2130
11591 08/27/92 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 PERS RET 001-2390
11591 08/27/92 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREN 000246 PERS RET 100-2390
11591 08/27/92 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 PERS RET 190-2390
11591 08/27/92 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 PERS RET 300-2390
42.94
171.76
8,540.19
1,607.01
1,811.56
92.26
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA
08/27/92 16:33 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
'~"' FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NUMBER DATE NLINBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER
[TEN
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
11591 08/27/92 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 PERS RET 320-2390
11591 08/27/92 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 PERS RET 330-2390
11591 08/27/92 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 SURVIVOR 001-2390
11591 08/27/92 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 SURVIVOR 100-2390
11591 08/27/92 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 SURVIVOR 190-2390
11591 08/27/92 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 SURVIVOR 300-2390
11591 08/27/92 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 SURVIVOR 320-2390
11591 08/27/92 000246 PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREM 000246 SURVIVOR 330-2390
183.21
216.37
40.70
9.06
9.30
.46
.93
1.86
12,727.61
11592 08/27/92 000248 PETROLANE OPEN PO FOR PETROLINE 190-180-999-5263
11592 08/27/92 000248 PETROLANE OPEN PO FOR PETROLINE 190-180-999-5263
11592 08/27/92 000248 PETROLANE OPEN PO FOR PETROLINE 190-180-999-5263
11592 08/27/92 000248 PETROLANE OPEN PO FOR PETROLINE 190-180-~9-5263
34.76
72.03
45.02
49.80
201.61
11593 08/27/92 000275 ROMERO, LUCI
INTERVIEW LUNCHEON REIM 001-150-999-5260
54.14
54.14
11594 08/27/92 000278 SAN DIEGO UNION TRIBUNE OPEN P.O. JOB RECRUITME 001-150-999-5254
324.52
324.52
11595 08/27/92 000291 SPEE DEE OIL CHANGE & T REPAIR & MAINTENANCE;VE 310-162-999-5214
11595 08/27/92 000291 SPEE DEE OIL CHANGE & T REPAIR & MAINTENANCE;VE 310-180-999-5214
22.49
22.49
44.98
11596 08/27/92 000307
.1597 08/27/92 000325
11597 08/27/92 000325
11597 08/27/92 000325
11597 08/27/92 000325
11597 08/27/92 000325
11598 08/27/92 000326
11598 08/27/92 000326
TEMECULA TROPHY
UNITED WAY OF THE INLAN
UNITED WAY OF THE ]NLAN
UNITED WAY OF THE INLAN
UNITED WAY OF THE INLAN
UNITED WAY OF THE INLAN
UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE
UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE
TROPHIES/BILLIARD TOUR
190-183-819-5300
000325 UW 001-2120
000325 UW 100-2120
000325 UW 190-2120
000325 UU 300-2120
000325 UW 330-2120
2-SETS OF UNIFORMS; CLE
2-SETS OF UNIFORMS; CLE
100-164-999-5243
100-164-999-5243
90.51
62.75
8.00
14.00
1.25
5.00
12.50
12.50
90.51
91.00
Z5.00
11599 08/27/92 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILL1 5100 XEROX LEASE AGREEM 330-199-999-5582
11599 08/27/92 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI 5100 XEROX LEASE AGREEM 330-199-999-5582
2,345.00
2,345.00
4,690.00
11600 08/27/92 000360 GREEK, HAROLD F.
CARRY OVER FROM FY 91-9 190-180-999-5250
397.50
397.50
11601 08/27/92 000370 BIRDSALL, PATRICIA REIMB. EXPENSE RPT AUG 001-100-999-5258
Z~>8.44
3~.44
11602 08/27/92 00037'~ SECURITY PACIFIC NATION BANK CHARGES FOR JULY 9 001-199-999-5232
414.00
414.00
11603 08/27/92 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 55-77-126-7901-03 190-2020
9.59
9.59
11604 08/27/92 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 714874994/07/01-07/15 190-180-999-5208
11604 08/27/92 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 7142924020/06/30-07/29 190-180-999-5208
11604 08/27/92 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 71422927681/JULY 92 001-163-94)9-5208
11604 08/27/92 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 7142927682/JULY 92 001-163-999-5208
11604 08/27/92 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 7143456005/JULY 92 001-110-999-5208
11604 08/27/92 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 7143457418/06/29-07/22 190-180-999-5208
11604 08/27/92 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 7143457421/JULY 92 001-110-999-5208
"'41604 08/27/92 000375 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 7147458550/06/30-07/28 190-180-999-5208
41.83
58.10
52.61
79.34
314.91
66.55
79.11
54.20
746.65
VOUCHRE2
08/27/92
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
11605
11605
11606
11607
11608
11608
11608
11608
11608
11608
11608
11609
11609
11610
11611
11611
11611
11611
11611
11612
11613
11613
11614
11615
11615
11616
11616
11616
11616
11617
11618
11619
11620
11621
16:33
CHECK VENDOR VENDOR
DATE NUMBER NAME
08/27/92
08/27/92
08/27/92
08/27/92
08/27/92
08/27/92
08/27/92
08/27/92
08/27/92
08/27/92
08/27/92
08/27/92
08/27/92
08/27/92
08/27/92
08/27/92
08/27/92
08/27/92
08/27/92
08/27/92
08/27/92
08/27/92
08/27/92
08/27/92
08/27/92
08/27/92
08/27/92
08/27/92
08/27/92
08/27/92
08/27/92
08/27/92
08/27/92
08/27/92
000389 USCM
000389 USCM
000405 SMITH, PHILLIP
000412 WILLIAMSt KAY
000426
000426
000426
000426
000426
000426
000426
RANCHO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL
RANCHO iNDUSTRIAL SUPPL
RANCHO iNDUSTRIAL SUPPL
RANCHO iNDUSTRIAL SUPPL
RANCHO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL
RANCHO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL
RANCHO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL
000443 ROBERT HALF/ACCOUNTEMPS
000443 ROBERT HALF/ACCOUNTEMPS
000466 WHITEHEAD, RHONDA
000475
000475
000475
000475
000475
BNI PUBLICATIONS, INC.
BNI PUBLICATIONS, INC,
BNI PUBLICATIONS, INC.
BNI PUBLICATIONS, INC.
BNI PUBLICATIONS, INC.
000495 ACT 1
000506 ORANGE OCAST TITLE CO
000506 ORANGE OCAST TITLE CO
000515 CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
000521 STEWART, BRUCE M.
000521 STEWART, BRUCE M.
000525 PARKS, RONALD J.
000525 PARKS, RONALD J.
000525 PARKS, RONALD J.
000525 PARKS, RONALD J.
000526 U.C. REGENTS
000527 MUNGLE, CHARLES
000528 ROTH EXPOSITION GROUP
000529 STATE OF CAL. GOVERNORS
000530 SELF-INSTRUCTIONAL COOR
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
000389 PT RETIR
000389 PT RETIR
ICBO REIMBERSENENT
80% OF CONTRACT/CLASS M
TOILET TISSUE
33 GALLON TRASH BAGS
TOILET SEAT COVERS
PINK HAND SOAP
TAX
MISC CLEANING/BATHROOM
MISC CLEANING/BATHROOM
TEMP.SERVICE; FINANCE D
TEMP SERVICE; FINANCE D
80% OF CONTRACT/CLASS T
STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
1992 "GREEN BOOK" SUPPL
STATE CALIFORNIA MANUAL
FREIGHT
TAX
TEMPORARY HELP
ONE YEAR CHARGE FOR TIT
ONE YEAR CHARGE FOR TIT
COUNCIL ACTION
SERV. REND. MAY 92
SERV. REND. JUNE 92
EXP REPORT REINB. OCT 9
EXPENSE REPORT REIN JUN
EXP REPORT REIMB. JAN 9
REIN. EXPENSE REPORT 8/
CTAP COURSE/EDUCATION
K-9 KENNELS
CRAFT SHOW/CLASSES
PURCHASE BOOKS
SUPERVISORY MAN. COURSE
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-2160
190-2160
001-162-999-5258
190-183-817-5300
001-199-999-5242
001-199-999-5242
001-199-999-5242
001-199-999-5242
001-199-999-5242
001-199-999-5242
001-199-999-5242
001-140-999-5118
001-140-999-5118
190-183-811-5300
001-163-999-5228
001-163-999-5228
001-163-999-5228
001-163-999-5228
001-163-999-5228
190-180-999-5118
001-162-999-5250
190-180-999-5250
001-100-999-5266
001-2020
001-2020
001-100-999-5258
001-100-999-5258
001-100-999-5258
001-100-999-5258
001-163-999-5258
001-170-999-5285
190-183-809-5300
001-161-999-5228
001-120-999-5258
ITEM
AMOUNT
647.76
830,86
10.00
320.00
38.40
35.42
36.00
5.36
8.93
104.31
14.33
237.00
361.00
206.40
180.00
23.85
51.75
16.75
19.81
160.96
150.00
150.00
46,000.00
50.00
230.00
12.81
7.47
.17
44.00
80.00
365.11
9.00
18.00
105.00
PAGE 5
CHECK
AMOUNT
1,478.62
10.00
320.00
242.75
598.00
206.40
292.16
160.96
300.00
46,000.00
280.00
6~.45
80.00
365.11
9.00
18.00
105.00
VOUCHRE2
08/27/92
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
11622
11623
11623
16:33
CHECK
DATE
08/27/92
08/27/92
08/27/92
VENDOR
NUMBER
000531
000532
000532
VENDOR
NAME
SO. CAL. ASSOCIATION OF
SECURITY PACIFIC NAT'L
SECURITY PACIFIC NAT'L
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
TAPES FOR LIBRARY
47980200000108223/JULY
4798020000010823/JULY
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-161-999-5228
001-100-999-5258
001-100-999-5258
ITEM
AMOUNT
10.00
83.96
188.28
PAGE 6
CHECK
AMOUNT
10.00
272.24
TOTAL CHECKS
432,896.72
VOUCHRE2
08/27/92
16:33
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE 7
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
100 GAS TAX FUND
110 RANCHO CALIF ROAD REIMB DIST
190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND
300 INSURANCE FUND
310 VEHICLES FUND
320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS
330 COPY CENTER FUND
TOTAL
AMOUNT
85,783.33
5,921.77
255,225.60
9,957.21
63,224.93
290.69
44.98
3,041.32
9,406.89
432,896.72
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA
08/28/92 10:00 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
11628 09/08/92 HSV DESIGN
REFUND PLOT PLAN 230 001-2670
8,500.00
8,500.00
11629 09/08/92 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE REPAIR IRRIGATION MAINL 193-180-999-5510
11629 09/08/92 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE REPAIR IRRIGATION SYSTE 193-180-999-5510
11629 09/08/92 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION REPAIRS; SPO 190-180-999-5250
11629 09/08/92 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE EWO #1701 REPAIR VALVE 190-180-999-5250
11629 09/08/92 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE EXTRA WORK ORDER #2535 190-180-999-5250
11629 09/08/92 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE EXTRA WORK ORDER #2528 190-180-999-5250
11629 09/08/92 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE 2" SLIP FIX COUPLING 193-180-999-5510
11629 09/08/92 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE 2" COUPLING 193-180-999-5510
11629 09/08/92 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION TECHNICIAN 193-180-999-5510
11629 09/08/92 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE LABORER 193-180-999-5510
182.60
188.20
519.15
92.10
87.00
125.00
9.45
.95
50.00
48.00
1,302,45
11630 09/08/92 000178 GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO 386SX; WORKSTAT[ON 320-199-999-5604
11630 09/08/92 000178 GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO HEWLETT PACKARD LASERJE 320-199-999-5605
11630 09/08/92 000178 GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO TAX 320-199-999-5604
11630 09/08/92 000178 GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO TAX 320-199-999-5605
11630 09/08/92 000178 GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO ZOOM NOOEN; 24000 BAUD 320-199-999-5221
11630 09/08/92 000178 GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO FREIGHT 320-199-999-5221
11630 09/08/92 000178 GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO TAX 320-199-999-5221
11630 09/08/92 000178 GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO 386SX WORKSTATION 320-199-999-5604
11630 09/08/92 000178 GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO HEWLETT PAClC~RD LASERJE 320-199-999-5605
J_1630 09/08/92 000178 GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO TAX 320-199-999-5604
30 09/08/92 000178 GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO TAX 320-199-999-5605
7,400.00
1,513.00
577.58
113.18
2]7.00
10.00
18.37
925.00
1,513.00
71.69
117.25
12,496.07
11631 09/08/92 000202 J.F. DAVIDSON
CONSULTING TRAFFIC ENGI 100-164-999-5406
10,000.00 10,000.00
11632 09/08/92 000207 KLEINFELDER
PRO. SERV. MARCH 92 001-2020
2,000.00 2,000.00
11633 09/08/92 000220 MAURICE PRINTERS QUICK COPIES OF FAMILY DIASTE 001'110'999-5257
11633 09/08/92 000220 MAURICE PRINTERS QUICK TAX 001'110'999-5257
942.00
7'5.01 1,015.01
11634 09/08/92 000230 MUNI FINANCIAL SERVICES ANNUAL MAINT. OF ADMIN. 190'180-999-5525
11634 09/08/92 000230 MUNI FINANCIAL SERVICES CSD'PHASE 4 SOFTWARE SY 001-2020
1,500.00
5,000.00 6,500.00
11635 09/08/92 000257 RAMTEK STREET MAINT. TO BE PER 100-164-999-5402
11635 09/08/92 000257 RAMTEK STREET MAINT. TO BE PER 100-164-999-5402
11635 09/08/92 000257 RAMTEK STREET MAINT. TO BE PER 100-164-999-5402
11635 09/08/92 000257 RAMTEK STREET MAINT. TO BE PER 100-164-999-5402
11635 09/08/92 000257 RAMTEK STREET MAINT. TO BE PER 100-164-9<39-5402
386.71
6,060.47
5,602.51
14,675.30
3,487.00
30,211.99
11636 09/08/92 000267 RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE D FORWARD MONIES TO FIRE 001'2230
19,875.75 19,875.75
11637 09/08/92 000269 RIVERSIDE OFFICE SUPPLY CREDIT, STACKABLE TRAY 001-199-999-5220
11637 09/08/92 000269 RIVERSIDE OFFICE SUPPLY CREDIT, CALCULATOR ROLL 001-199-999-5220
11637 09/08/92 000269 RiVERSiDE OFFICE SUPPLY 36X24X78; LOCKING STORA 001-199-999-5242
11637 09/08/92 000269 RIVERSIDE OFFICE SUPPLY TAX 001-199-999-5242
11637 09/08/92 000269 RIVERSIDE OFFICE SUPPLY L-P 073-01; CORRECTION 001-163-999-5220
11637 09/08/92 000269 RIVERSIDE OFFICE SUPPLY GRIP 398; XEROX 6010 SE 001-120-999-5220
11637 09/08/92 000269 RIVERSIDE OFFICE SUPPLY GR 1368; LIFT OFF TAPE 001-120-999-5220
11637 09/08/92 000269 RIVERSIDE OFFICE SUPPLY F-C 60144; FABER CASTEL 001-120-999-5220
54.57-
3.78-
2,872.50
222.62
7.55
11.96
14.70
6.60
VOUCHRE2
08/28/92
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
11637
11637
11637
11637
11637
11637
11637
11637
11637
11637
11637
11637
11637
11637
11638
11639
11639
11640
11640
10:00
CHECK
DATE
09/08/92
09/08/92
09/08/92
09/08/92
09/08/92
09/08/92
09/08/92
09/08/92
09/08/92
09/08/92
09/08/92
09/08/92
09/08/92
09/08/92
09/08/92
09/08/92
09/08/92
09/08/92
09/08/92
VENDOR
NUMBER
000269
000269
000269
000269
000269
000269
000269
000269
000269
000269
000269
000269
000269
000269
000403
00C~,47
000/,47
000474
000474
VENDOR
NAME
RIVERSIDE OFFICE SUPPLY
RIVERSIDE OFFICE SUPPLY
RIVERSIDE OFFICE SUPPLY
RIVERSIDE OFFICE SUPPLY
RIVERSIDE OFFICE SUPPLY
RIVERSIDE OFFICE SUPPLY
RIVERSIDE OFFICE SUPPLY
RIVERSIDE OFFICE SUPPLY
RIVERSIDE OFFICE SUPPLY
RIVERSIDE OFFICE SUPPLY
RIVERSIDE OFFICE SUPPLY
RIVERSIDE OFFICE SUPPLY
RIVERSIDE OFFICE SUPPLY
RIVERSIDE OFFICE SUPPLY
SHAMN SCOTT POOL & SPA
CONTRONIX OF HEMET
CONTRONIX OF HEMET
ARBOR-PRO TREE SERVICE
ARBOR-PRO TREE SERVICE
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
[TEN
DESCRIPTION
SALES TAX 7.75%
IDL16008; BOOK ENDS; GR
K-CE017-50; CALENDAR RE
BTERSH20; SIGN HERE ARR
TOP4001; PHONE MESSAGE
AV45348; ADORESS LABELS
ANP20-375; i4RITING PADS
NNN635; POST IT PADS
HMN660GRY; POST IT PADS
TAX
BENO-746;BENCHMAR ENVEL
BENOT-749;BENCHMARK ENV
BENOT-752;BENCHMARK ENV
TAX
OPEN PURCHASE ORDER FOR
DISASTER CASE RADIO
TAX
RAISE 50 R.O.~. TREES T
RAISE R.O.~. TREE TO 14
TOTAL CHECKS
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-120-999-5220
001-120-999-5220
001-120-999-5220
001-120-999-5220
001-120-999-5220
001-120-999-5220
001-120-999-5220
001-120-999-5220
001-120-999-5220
001-120-999-5220
001-120-999-5220
001-120-999-5220
001-120-999-5220
001-120-999-5220
190-180-999-5212
001-199-999-5610
001-199-999-5610
100-164-999-5402
100-164-999-5402
ITEM
AMOUNT
3.17
5.44
.90
7.50
13.50
20.85
11.00
4.95
7.40
5.55
10.98
14.40
12,60
2.95
1,333.00
2,075.00
160.81
480.50
1,953.00
PAGE 3
CHECK
AMOUNT
3,198.77
1,333.00
2,235.81
2,433.50
101,102. .
VOUCHRE2
08/28/92
10:00
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
100 GAS TAX FUND
190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
193 TCSD ZONE C
320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS
TOTAL
AMOUNT
41,825.34
42,645.49
3,656.25
479.20
12,496.07
101,102.35
ITEM
NO.
4
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
City Manager/City Council
FROM:
Mary Jane Henry, Finance Officer
DATE:
September 8, 1992
SUBJECT:
Advance for Land Surveying and Geotechnical
Margarita Road Extension Interim Improvements
(Project No. PW92-04)
Services for
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:
Find that the extension of Margarita Road will benefit the redevelopment project
area, and the immediate neighborhood in which the road extension is located;
and, that there are no other reasonable means of financing the road extension·
Approve an advance of $46,300 from the General Fund Revolving Fund to the
Redevelopment Agency (RDA) for Land Surveying and Geotechnical Services
for the construction of Margarita Road Extension Interim ImprOvements.
DISCUSSION: In order for the Redevelopment Agency to fund land
surveying and geotechnical services for construction of the Margarita Road Extension
Interim Improvements, it is necessary that City Council find that the Improvement will
benefit the Project Area and that no other funding mechanism is reasonably available.
Accordingly, it is recommended that the Council approve an advance of $46,300 from
the General Fund Revolving Fund to the Redevelopment Agency. This advance will
be repaid from RDA bond proceeds.
A map of the Project Area is attached. Margarita Road is the eastern boundary of the
Project Area. Extending Margarita Road will relieve traffic from Ynez Road and
improve traffic circulation throughout Subarea 4 of the Project Area.
No other reasonable means are available to finance Margarita Road because
Development Impact Fees are otherwise committed in the Capital Improvement
Program·
P~N92-O4.AGN/AJP
ITEM
NO.
5
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY~
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
PREPARED BY:
City Council/City Manager
~/~ Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
September 8, 1992
Award of Contract for FY92-93 Street Striping and Stenciling
Brad Buron, Maintenance Supervisor
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council award a contract for the Citywide Street Striping and Stenciling to
Orange County Striping Service, Inc. for FY92-93 and authorize the Mayor to execute the
contract.
BACKGROUND:
On July 14, 1992, the City Council authorized the Public Works Department to advertise the
Notice Inviting Bids for Citywide Street Striping and Stenciling for FY92-93.
Bid for this contract were publicly opened and read on August 13,, 1992 at 4:30 p.m. The
bids received were as follows:
1. Orange County Striping Inc. $150,970.00
2. I.P.S. Services Inc. 194,640.00
3. Paving Contractors Inc. 174,657.50
4. J & S Sign Company 210,445.00
Staff recommendation is to award the contract to Orange County Striping Inc. as the lowest
responsible bidder.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The approved budget
100-164-999-5410.
for FY92-93 has allocated $125,000 under Account Number
pw01 ~agdrpt~92~Og08\stripe.ewd 0826e
ITEM
NO.
I
I
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
/~j Tim D~et, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
September 8, 1992
Final Parcel Map No. 275q5
PREPARED BY:
Kris Winchak, Senior Plan Check Coordinator
RECOMMENDATION:
That City Council APPROVE Final Parcel Map No. 27545
subject to the Conditions of Approval.
BACKGROUND:
Tentative Parcel Map No. 27545 was approved by the City of Temecula Planning
Commission on July 6, 1992.
Final Parcel Map No. 27545 is a three parcel development on a 3.0 acre site located
between Ynez Road and interstate 15 Freeway and north of 5olana Way. The site is
currently being developed under Approved Conditional Use Permit No. 2, approved
by City Council on October 9, 1990. The site development proposes to construct
three commercial buildings that will occupy each of the three parcels subdivided with
the recording of the Final Parcel Map.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
The following fees have been paid (or deferred) for Final Parcel Map No 27545.
* Area Drainage Fees $
* Fire Mitigation Fees (Deferred to Building Permits) $
* Traffic Signal Mitigation (Deferred to Building Permits) $
* Stephen~s K-Rat Fees {at Grading Permits) $
5,910.00
T .B.D.
7,500.00
5,850.00
The following bonds have been posted for Revised Vesting Final Tract Map No.
23267-3:
Faithful Other Labor and
Performance Bonds Materials
Streets and Drainage 0.00 0.00
Water 0.00 0.00
Sewer 0. O0 0.00
Survey Monuments $2,112.00
SUMMARY:
Staff recommends that City Council APPROVE Final Parcel Map No. 27545 subject to
the attached Conditions of Approval.
KW/TN:ks
Attachments:
2.
3.
Development Fee Checklist
Location Map
Copy of Map
Conditions of Approval (Cup No. 2) dated
October 9, 1990
Conditions of Approval dated July 6, 1992
Fees and Securities Report
,~TTACHMENT 1
DEVELOPMENT FEE CHECKLIST
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEVELOPMENT FEE CHECKLIST
Final Parcel Map No. 275/)5
The following fees were reviewed by Staff relative to their applicability to this
project.
Fee
Habitat Conservation Plan
(K-Rat)
Parks and Recreation
I Quimby )
Public Facility
Traffic Signal Mitigation
Condition of Approval
Condition No. 33
{ CUP No. 2 )
N/A
Condition No. 57 ('
Condition No. 37
Fire Mitigation
Flood Control
(ADP)
See Fire Department Letter
Dated 3-30-90 ( CUP No. 2 )
./
Condition No. 52
Regional Statistical Area
( RSA )
N/A
Staff Findings:
Staff finds that the project will be consistent with the City~s General Plan once
adopted.
The project is not a part of a specific plan.
ATTACHMENT 2
LOCATION MAP
~o~
c~
VICINITY
MAP
no t to scale
ATTACHMENT 3
COPY OF MAP
ATTACHMENT 4
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CUP No. 2
OCTOBER 9.1990
Mayor
Ron Parks
Mayor Pro Tam
Farel F. Lindemans
October 15, 1990
CITY OF TEMECULA
P.O. Box 3000
Temecula, California 92390
(714) 694-1989
FAX (714) 694-1999
Councilmembers
Patricia H. Birds~
Peg Moore
J. Sal Mu~oz
Mr. Larry Gabale
~275 Executive Square, Suite 10~0
La Joila, CA 92307
SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit No. 2
Dear Mr. Gabale:
On October 9, 1990, the City Council approved a motion to Receive and File
Conditional Use Permit No. 2 subjectto the Conditions of Approval as amended at the
Planning Commission hearing of September 17, 1990.
The Conditions listed below were amended by the Planning commission to read as
fol lows:
5. I n the event the use hereby permitted ceases operation for a period of one | 1 )
year or more, this approval shall become null and void.
20. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the following additional andJor
revised plans shall be submitted for Planning Department approval:
Landscaping, irrigation, and Shading Plans
Parking and Circulation Plans
20.a.
2Li..
The applicant shall submit a signing program prior to occupancy.
Prior to the final building inspection approval by the Building and Safety
Department, a six foot high decorative block wall or combination landscaped
earthen berm and decorative block wall shall be constructed along the
easteriy 120 feet of the north property line and the entire length of the south
property line. The required wall and/or berm shall be subject to the
approval of the Director of the Department of Building and Safety and the
Planning Director.
If the owner of the property south of the subject property submits a
discretionary application within two years of the approval of this application
or prior to occupancy of the project in question, and said application shows
PLANNING\L79
Mr. Larry Gabele
October 15, 1990
Page 2
a building located on the south property line of the subject property, the
applicant shall not be required to construct said wall where the building on
the adjacent property abuts the property line.
29. This project may be located within a subsidence or liquefaction zone. Prior
to issuance .of any building permit by the City of Temecula. a California
Licensed Soils Engineer or Geologist shall submit a report to the Building and
Safety Department identifying the potential for subsidence or liquefaction.
Where hazard of subsidence or liquefaction is determined to exist,
appropriate mitigation measures must be demonstrated.
Conditional Use Permit No. 2 will expire on October 9, 1991 if substantial
construction is not begun. A request for an extension of time may be flied before
the expiration date.
If you have any questions, please contact me at (714) 69~-6zl00.
Sincerely,
Scott Wright
Associate Planner
Gary Thornhill
Planning Director
SW/GT: ks
cc: ida Sanchez, Markham ~; Associates
PLANN ! NG\L79
ATTACHMENT B
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Conditional Use Permit No. 2
Formerly Plot Plan No. 11694
Council Approval Date: October 9, 1990
Expiration Date: October 9, 1991
Pianninq Department
1. The use hereby permitted by this Conditional Use Permit is for an automotive
center with 21,117 square feet of service area and 8,824 square feet of retail
area.
2. The permittee shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of
Temecula, its agents officers, and employees from any claims, action, or
proceeding against the City or its agents, officers, or employees to attack,
set aside, void, or annul, an approval of the City of Temecula, its advisory
agencies, appeal boards, or lagislatlve body concerning Conditional User
Permit No. 2. The City of Temecula will promptly notify the permittee of any
such claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula and will
Cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the
permittee of any such claim, action or.proceeding or fails to cooperate fully
in the defense, the permlttee shall not, thereafter, be respOnsible to defend,
indemnify, or hold harmless the City of Temecula.
3. This approval shall be used within one ( 1 ) year. of approval date; otherwise,
it shall become null and void and of no effect whatsoever. By use is meant
the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval
within the one (1) year period which is .thereafter diligently pursued to
completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this
approval.
The development of the premises shall conform substantially with that as
shown on plot plan marked Exhibit 3, or as amended by these conditions.
5. in the event the use hereby permitted ceases operation for a period of one
{1 ) year or more, this approval shall become null and void.
6. Any outside ilghtlng shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly
upon adjoining property or pubilc rights-of-way.
7. The applicant shall comply with the street improvement recommendations
outlined in the Conditions of the City Division of Transportation Engineering
contained herein.
STAFFRPT\CUP2 1
10.
11.
12.
13.
15.
16.
17.
The applicant shall comply with the conditions of approval of the City
Engineering Department contained herein.
Water and sewerage disposal facilities shall be installed in accordance with
the provisions set forth in the Riverside County Health Departmentts
transmittal dated Januam/19, 1990, a copy of which is attached.
Flood protection shall be provided in accordance with the Riverside County
Flood Control Districtts transmittal dated April 11, 1990, a copy of which is
attached.
Fire protection shall be provided in accordance with the appropriate section
of Ordinance No. 546 and the County Fire Wardents transmittal dated March
30, 1990, a copy of which is attached.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations sat forth in the
Riverside County Geolagistts transmittal dated March 7, 1990, a copy of
which is attached.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations sat forth in the
Department of Transportation transmittal dated January 4, 1990, a copy of
which is attached.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations sat forth in the San
Bernardino County Museum transmittal dated December 22, 1989, a copy of
which is attached.
All landscaped areas shall be planted in accordance with approved
landscape, irrigation. and shading plans prior to the issuance of occupancy
permits. An automatic sprinkler system shall be installed and ali landscaped
areas shall be maintained in a viable growth condition. P|anting within ten
110) feet of an entry or exit driveway shall not be permitted to grow higher
than thirty {30) inches.
Prior to the issuance of grading or building permits, nine {9) copies of a
Parking, Landscaping, Irrigation, and Shading Plans shall be submitted to
the Planning Department for approval. The Io~ion, number, genus,
species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. Plans shall meet all
requirements of Ordinance No. 3~8, Section 18.12, and shall be accompanied
by a filing fee as set forth in Section 18.12, and shall be accompanied by a
filing fee as set forth in Section 18.37 of Ordinance No. 348.
A minimum of 172 parking spaces shall be provided in accordance with
Section 18.12, Riverside County Ordinance No. 3~48. 172 parking spaces
shall be provided as shown on the Approved Exhibit No. 3. The parking
area shall be surfaced with I asphaltic concrete paving to a minimum depth of
3 inches on 4 inches of Class I I base. ) { decomposed granite compacted to a
minimum thickness of three {3) inches treated with not less than 112 gallon
per square yard of penetration coat oil, followed within six months by an
application of 1/4 gallon per square yard of seal coat oil. )
STAFFRPT\CUP2 2
18.
20.
20.a.
21.
22.
23.
A minimum of 5 handicapped parking spaces shall be provided as shown on
Exhibit No. 3. Each parking space reserved for the handicapped shall be
identified by a permanently affixed raflectorized sign constructed of
porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal, displaying the International Symbol
of Accessibility, The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square inches in area
and shall be centered at the interior end of the parking space at a minimum
height of 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking spac~ finished
grade, or centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space
finished grade, ground, or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a
conspicuous place, at each entrance to the off-street parking facility, not
less than 17 inches by 22 inches, clearly and conspicuously stating the
fol I owi ng:
"Unauthorized vehicles not displaying distinguishing
placards or license plates issued for physically
handicapped persons may be towed away at owneris
expense. Towed vehicles may be reclaimed at
or by telephoning -
)n addltlon to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place
shall have a surface identification sign duplicating the symbol of accessibility
in blue paint of at least 3 square feet in size.
Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall obtain ciearance
and/or permits from the following agencies:
Riverside County Flood Control
City Engineering
~ Ef~vironmental H~a'i~n~,, Fire Department
Written evidence of compliance shall be presented to the Land Use Division
of the Department of Building and Safety.
Prior to the issuance of building permits, the following additional and/or
revised plans shall be submitted for Planning Department approval:
Landscaping, Irrigation, and Shading Plans
Parking and Circulation Plans
The applicant shall submit a signing program prior to occupancy.
Bullding elevations shall be in substantial conformance with that shown on
Exhibit No. 2.
Materials used in the construction of all buildings shall be in substantial
conformance with that shown on Exhibit No. 1 I Color Board).
Roof-mounted equipment shall be shielded from ground view. Screening
material shall be subject to Planning Department approval.
Prior to the final building inspection approval by the Building and Safety
Department, a six foot high decorative block wall or combination landsr_=.ned
earthen berm and decorative block wall shall be constructed along the
STAFFRPT\CUP2 3
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
31.
32.
easterly 120 feet of the north property line and the entire length of the south
property line. The required wall and/or berm shall be subject to the
approval of the Director of the Department of Building and Safety and the
Planning Director.
If the owner of the property south of the subject property submits a
discretionary appllcation within two years of the approval of this application
or prior to occupancy of the project in question, and said application shows
a building located on the south property line of the subject property, the
applicant shall not be required to construct said wall where the building on
the adjacent property abuts the property line.
The trash enclosures which are adequate to enclose a total of ~ bins shall be
centrally located within the project, and shall be constructed prior to the
issuance of occupancy permits. Each enclosure shall be six feet in height
and shall be screened from external view.
Landscaping plans shall incorporate the use of specimen canopy trees along
streets and within the parking areas.
Any oak trees removed with four (~&) inch or larger trunk diameters shall be
placed on a ten 110) to one {1 ) basis as approved by the Planning Director.
All street lights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans
submitted to the Department of Building and Safety for plan check approval
and shall comply with the requirements of Riverside County Ordinance No.
655 and the Riverside County Comprehensive General Plan.
This project may be located within a subsidence or liquefaction zone. Prior
to issuance of any building permit by the City of Temecula, a California
Licensed Soils Engineer or Geologist shall submit a report to the Building and
Safety Department identifying the potential for subsidence or liquefaction.
Where hazard of subsidence or liquefaction is determined to exist,
appropriate mitigation measures must be demonstrated.
Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall prepare and
submit a written report to the Planning Director demonstrating compliance
with those conditions of approval and mitigation measures of this permit and
its Initial Study which must be satisfied prior to the issuance of a grading
permit.
Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall prepare and
submit a written report to the Planning Director of the City of Temecula
demonstrating compliance with those conditions of approval and mitigation
measures of this permit and its Initial Study which must be satisfied prior to
the issuance of a grading permit.
Prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit, the applicant shall prepare and
submit a written report to the Planning Director of the City of Temecula
demonstrating compliance with all remaining conditions of approval and
mitigation measures of the permit and its Initial Study.
STAFFRPT\CUP2
based on (the gross acreage of the parcels proposed for development) I the
number of single family residential units on lots which are a minimum of one-
35.
36.
39.
half {1/2) gross acre in size). Should Ordinance No. 663 be superseded by
the provisions of a Habitat Conservation Plan prior to the payment of the
fees required by Ordinance No. 663, the applicant shall pay the fee required
· under the Habitat Conservation Plan as implemented by County ordinance or
resolution.
1 Class I ! I bicycle racks shall be provided in convenient locations to facilitate
bicycle access to the project area.
Prior to the issuance of building permits, performance securities, in amounts
to be determined by the Director of Building and Safety to guarantee the
installation of plantinge, walls, and fences in accordance with the approved
plan, and adequate maintenance of the planting for one year, shall be filed
with the Department of Building and Safety.
Prior to the issuance of occupancy permits, all required landscape planting
and irrigation shall have ben installed and be in a condition accP_pf;hle to
the Director of Building and Safety. The plants shall be healthy and free of
weeds, disease, or pests- The irrigation system shail be properly
constructed and in good working order.
All utilities, except electrlcei lines rated .33kv or greater, shall be installed
underground.
AI! of the foregoing condltions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or
any use allowed by this permit.
Engine repair or body work services shai) be prohibited.
Enclineerincl Department
The following are the Engineering Department Conditions of Approval for this
project, and shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All questions
regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the Engineering
Department.
it is understood that the Developer correctiy shows all existing easements, traveled
ways, and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be
resubmitted for further consideration.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS:
A detailed Drainage Study will be required to be submitted to the City
Engineer for review and approval. The Study shall be prepared by a
Registered Civil Engineer and shall include existing, interim, and proposed
conditions, including hydrolagy and hydraulic calculations-
STAFFRPT\CUP2 5
Concentrated drainage-flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk
drains shall be installed to City Standards.
A permit shall be required from CalTrans for any work within their right-of-
way.
The developer shall submit four 14) copies of a soils report to the
Engineering Deparl~nent. The report shall eddr~s the soils stability and
geological conditions of the site.
The developer shall submit four 14) prints of a comprehensive grading plan
to the Engineering Department. The plan shall comply with the Uniform
Building Code and Chapter 70 as may be additionally provided for in these
Conditions of Approval. The plan shall be drawn on 24"x36" mylar by a
Registered Civil Engineer.
The final grading plans shall be completed and approved prior to issuance
of building permits.
46.
A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the
prevailing Area Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new
.development. The charge is payable to the Flood Control District prior to
issuance of permits. if the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge
has already credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid.
A grading permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Department prior
to commencement of any grading outside of the City-maintained road right-
of-way.
No grading shall take place prior to the improvement plans being
substantially complete, appropriate clearance letters and approval by the
City Engineer.
5O.
51.
52.
If grading is to take place betwc=n the months of October and April, erosion
control plans will be required. Erosion control plans and notes shall be
submitted and approved by the Engineering Department.
The developer shall comply with the requirements of the City Engineer based
on the recommendations of the Riverside County Flood Control District.
The developer shall accept and properly dispose of all off-site drainage
flowing onto or through the site.
The applicant shall obtain clearance and/or permits from the following
agencies:
- Eastern Municipal Water District ~" ~/u.
City Engineer ~-
_.. vironmental Health
- Fire Department
- Planning Department
- Riverside County Flood Control y-
STAFFRPT\CUP2
- Rancho Califorhia Water District
- · Riverside Transit Agency
PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT:
53.
55.
56.
58.
59.
PRIOR
60.
61.
62.
All work done within the City right-of-way shall have an encroachment
permit.
All driveways shall conform to the applicable County of Riverside standards
and shall be shown on the street improvement plans.
Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall deposit with the
Engineering Department a cash sum as established per acre as mitigation for
traffic signal impact.
The design and construction of improvements for Ynez Road shall be bonded
for in the event that the Mello Roos does not construct the required public
improvements i n accordance with County Standard No. 100A ( 110~ / 13~~ ).
Dedication shall be made of the following right-of-way on the following
streets:
DEDICATE YNEZ ROAD TO 67~ FEET FROM STREET CENTERLINE
Non-vehicular access rights shall be dedi~=~ed to the City for Ynez Road
except for one driveway located at the north property line.
The developer shall obtain an easement for ingress and egress over the
adjacent property.
TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATION OF OCCUPANCY:
Construct full street improvements on Ynez Road including but not limited
to curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway
trees and street lights. "
Ynez Road shall be improved with concrete curb and gutter located 55 feet
from centerline and asphalt concrete paving, within a 67 foot half-wldth
dedicated right-of-way in accordance with Riverside County Standard No.
100A, 1110/13~).
Developer shall pay any capital fee for road imp~-~vements and public
facilities imposed upon the property or project, including that for traffic and
public facility mitigation as required under the El R/Negative Declaration for
the project, in the amount in effect at the time of payment of the fee. If an
interim or final public facility mitigation fee or district has not ben finally
established by the date on which Developer requests its building permits for
the project or any phase thereof, the Developer shall execute the Agreement
for Payment of Public Facility Fee, a copy of which has been provided to
Developer. Developer understands that said agreement may require the
payment of fees in excess of those now estimated (assuming benefit to the
project in the amount of such fees) and specifically waives its right to
STAFFRPT\CUP2 7
protest such increase. -
63.
Concrete sidewalks shall be constructed along all public street frontages in
accordance with Riverside County Standard Nos. ~O0 and ~01.
The street design and improvement conceFt of this project shall be
coordinated with adjoining developments.
65.
Prior to building permit, the subdivider shall notify the City's C.A.T.V.
Franchises of the intent to develop. Conduit shall be installed to C.A.T.V.
Standards prior to issuance of Certificates of Occupancy.
All signing and striping shall be installed per the City standards and the
approved signing and striping plan.
Prior to occupancy, a sign shall be installed prohlblting left turns from the
project site.
68.
The traffic signal at Ynez Road and Solana Way shall be installed and
operational per the City Standards, special provisions and the approved
traffic signal plan prior to occupancy.
PRIOR TO RECORDATION:
69.
A signing and striping plan shall be deslgned by a registered traffic
engineer, and approved by the City Traffic Engineer and the City Engineer,
for all streets 66/~ or wider and shall be included in the street improvement
plans.
70. Prior to designing any of the above plans, contact Transportation
Engineering for the design criteria.
Buiidincl ~; Safety Department
71.
The applicant shall fill out an application for final inspection. Allow two [2)
weeks processing time to obtain all required clearances prior to final
inspection.
STAFFRPT\CUP2
FIllS:
IE:
County of Riverside
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
I~ X VERS l DE COUNTY PLANNtNG DEFT.
ATTN: John Ristow
1ATE: o~-~9-9o
HEALTH SPECIALIST IV
PLOT PLAN 11694
The Envxrgnmental Health Services has reviewed Plot
Plan 11694 and has no gb.iectzgns. Sanztarv sewer and water
services are av. allable ~n this area. Prior first L.D.C
meeting. the followlnQ items w~ll be submitted:
1. "Will-serve" letters from the water and sewerlno
a(:senCles.
If there are to be any hazardous mater%ale. a
clearance le~r from the Envzronmental Health
Servxces Hazardous Materials Management Branch
lJon Mohoroski. 358-$055). will be reuulred
Indicating that the project has been cleared for:
Underground storage tanks.
Hazardous Waste Generator Services.
C $
Hazardous Waste Dxsclosure
accordance wzth AB 2185).
d. Waste reduction management.
SM:Lac
co: Jon Hohoroskx. Hazardous Materxals Branch
JAN 2 3 1990
RIVER61DE COUNTY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
OOH.Gk.~2fPle, I1.PIII
*o
aosrd of Directors:
Jeffr~.. / Mltdcler
R&IFk Daily
,Jsmel A. Dmdsy
Ceabm F. Ko
Doec KuJberg
Slephe~l M, SIIIB
Richard D. Steffey
doba F, Hennif~r
Pklllip L, Forbes
T,emn, r
Themes IL McAliester
EdweN P. Leeone
D~w, let ~f r
· Pel'~, 11. t-,uck
L~da M, FreEewe
MrComick, Kidman
· Bebme
~ twin. el
Riverside County Division
of Environmental Health
Land Use Section
Post Office Box 1370
Riverside, California 92502
SI. fi3JECT: Water Availability
Reference: . Parcel Map 23960, Lot 2
(Yncz Auto Center)
Gentlemen:
Please be advised that the above-referenced property is located within the
boundaries of Rancho California Water District. Water service, therefore,
would be available upon completion of financial an'angements between
RCWD and the property owner.
Water availability would be contingent upon the property owner signing
an Agency Agreement which assigns water management fights, ff any, to
RCWD.
If you have any questions, please contact Scnga Dohcrty at (714) 676-
4101.
Sincerely,
RANCHO CALIFO~ WATER DISTRICT
Steve Brannon, P. E
Engineering Manager
FO12A/dpw76f
cc: Senga Dohcrty
J
TO:
FROM -.
RE:
MEMORANDUM
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL
AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
File
DATE==
We have reviewed this case and ask that the following items be
addressed on an amended map.
Topography .should be shown or corrected.
Show proposed grading and drainage.
Show how the project would be protected from storm flows.
Move structures/pads out of low area.
Proposed diversions should be corrected-
Show existing and proposed channels, culverts, drain pipes
and other such facilities.
~how existing watercourses.
ta~?;;;~.~e~
· . , . RIVERSIDE COUNTY
t.u-- . .. FIRE DEPARTMENT
IN C~PE~ON W~ ~E
'. CALIFORNIA DEPAR~E~ OF FORESPY
-~ ~ ~D RRE PRO~C~ON
GL;N J. N;WM~
RR; CHtE~
3-30-90
PLANNING & ENGINEERING PLANNLNG ,r,, ENCINt=ERING
46-2O90~S ~ ~ ~5 37~ t2~ ~
~DIG ~ 92201 RZ~D~ ~ 92501
(61~ 342~M6 (714) 787~6
TO:
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
ATTN: JOHN KISTOW
PLOT PLAN 11694 - AMENDED #1
With respect to the conditions of approval regarding the above referenced plot
plan, the Fire DeparCmenC recommends the following fire protection measures
be provided in accordance with Riverside County Ordinances and/or recognized
fire protection standards:
The Fire Departmen= is required Co set a minimum fire flov for the remodel
or cons=ructton of all commercial buildings Using the procedure established
in Ordinance 546.
e
Provide or show there exists a racer system capable of delivering 2500 GPM
for a 2 hour duration at 20 PSI residual operating pressure, which must be
available before any combus=ibis macer~al is placed on the Job site.
A combination of on-site and off-sire super fire hydran=s, on a looped
system (6"xe'x2½xZt), vill be loca=ed noc less than 25 feet or more than
165 feet from any pot=ion of the bulldtng as measured along approved
vehicular Eravelwsys. The required fire flow shall be available from
any adJacen= hydra==(s) in the sys=em.
Applican=/developer shai1 furnish one copy of the water system plans to
the Fire Departmen= for review. Plans shall conform Co the fire hydra==
types, location and spacing, and, the system shall mee= =he fire flow
requirements. Plans shall be signed/approved by a registered civil engineer
and the local water company with =he following cer=ifica=ion: "l cer=ify
Ehat the design of =he wa=er sys=em is. in accordance wi=h =he requirements
prescribed by the Riverside Coun=y Fire Departmen=."
The required fire flow may be adJusned at a later point in =he permit
process =o reflecg changes in design, construE=ion =ype, area separation
or buil=-in fire proneE=ion measures.
Install a comple=e fire sprinkler system in all buildings requiring a
fire flow of 1500 G~M or greacer. The poe= indicator valve and fire
departnee= connection shall be located no =he fro=r, vt~htn 50 fee= of
a hydra==, and a minimum of 25 fee= from =he building(s). A sEa=smear
=ha= =he building(s) rill be au=omartcally fire sprinklered must be
included on the ttnle page of =he building plans.
Subject: Plot Plan 11694
Page 2
7- 1netall a supervised waterfLow monitoring fire alarm system. Plans must be
submitted to the Fire Department for approval prior to installation, as
required by the Uniform Building Coae.
8. In lieu of fire sprinkler requirements, building(s) must he area separated
into square foot compartments, approved by the Fire Department, as per
Section 505 (e) of the Uniform Building Code.
9. A statement that the building will be automatically fire sprinklered
must appear on the-title page of the building plans.
10. lnstall panic hardware and exit signs as per Chapter 33 of the Uniform
Building Code.
11. Certain designated areas will be required to be maintained as fire lanes.
12. Install portable fire extinguishers with a minimum rating of 2A-10BC.
Contact a certified extinguisher company for proper placement of equipment.
13. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant/developer shall be
responsible to submit a check or money order in the amount of $413.00
to the Riverside County Fire Department for plan check fees.
14. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the developer shall deposit
with the Riverside County Fire Department, a check or money order equaling
the sum of 25C per square foot as mitigation for fire protection impacts-
This amount must be submitted separately from the plan check review fee.
15. Final conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed in the
Building and Safety Office.
All questions regarding the meaning of conditions shall be referred to the
Planning and Engineering staff.
RAYMOND H. KEGIS
Chief Fire Department' Planner
Laura Cabral, Fire Safety Specialist
ama
· - FRO~ R]U CNTY PLRNNiH5 DEPT. 86.2e,1~8 89:87 N0.2 P. 2
iVE:DiDE CO UIlCu.
FLArlllin6 DEPAqLqi1E
March 7, :LggO
(Rayteed June
Gao $o(ls, Znc.
248g0 Jefferson Avenue
P,0, 8ox4g0
Hurtlet·, CA 923(2
ATTIgffZON: ,1ohn P. Franklin
Albert R. Kletat
SUBJECT:
Alqu4, st-PHolo Spaeta1 Studlet Zone/Ltqu·~actton Hazard
W.0, 278-A-RC
Plot Plan No, ZZ694
Count~6eolog(¢ Report Nos, ~Z and 692
Temecula Area
Gentlemen:
we have revlewed the se4s~tc/geoleg(c aspects of your ~epo~ ent4t~ed
"Preliminary Soils and 6eoqog4c Update Report, Parcel'4 of Pitcol Map ~o.
Z3960, off of Ynez Road, Te~ecul·~ Ca," dated July 28, lgBg, and your addendum
dated February ZT, 1990, ~
Your report {letermlned that:'
Z. Ho evl~ence for fau~tngwas found tn the area of the previously
established fault setback zone on this s~te. The potential for ground
rupture at the site ts considered qow, '
The Nll~omar fault has been mlpped ~ust westerly of the sub3ect
property, Peak horizontal ground eccele~atlon from · max~:nJm credible
earthquake of 7.S magnitude on this fault could exceed 0,78g, Peak
horlZ0ntal Ground acceleration ~rom a maximum probable earthquake on
this fault could exceed 0.,74g,
3. Secondary earthquake effects o~
cra=Klng could occur at thls site,
4. The potent1·1 for tsunaml or se~che
developnent.
lurching and/or localized ground
is not cons(dared pertinent to c~te
4080 }.]~MON b'rREET, rrrl FLOOR
..... FIrVElqSfCIE, CALIFORNIA 92501
· . .C714} .7~..:~.81_..___.
79733 COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE, GurrE ·
BERMUDA DUNES; CALIFORNIA ~.'2.9.~'e,
,r6'lg) 342-8277 ...
· . ~0~ E]~ CHTY PL~HH]HG GErm, g~,26,19~0 Og=OS HO. 2 P. ~
County Geologtc Report Nos. 691 and 692
Revlsed dune Z5, $g90
Page Z
5. The potential for surface rloodtng at the site, although considered
low, un~ot be en~IPeqy pre{luded.
6. Indications o~ major mass movement or major qandsltding have not been
observed cr repor:ed on the site.
7. Some of the sandy 5oll lenses present In the vlcqniCy of 20 feet at
Boring B-3 have a potential for 11quefactlon. Subsidence due to
liquefaction would be localized to rill and no manifestation of
liquefaction ~s l~ke~y to occur a~ or near the ground surface.
Your report reconnended that:
;. Structural setbacks for faults are noC warranted on t~15 slte.
2. The potentqal for surface flooding should be further evaluated by the
design ergtneer.
3. GeoqcHJtc ~nspect?ons should be performed during site grading to verify
aeologtc conditions relative to fault~nc encountered both vl~hln or
~utslde of the Alqd~st-Prtolo Spectaq Studt~s Zone.
4. In order to mitigate qtquefact~on potenttaq and/or seismically ~nduced
dynamic settlement, all extsttng f~l and topsoil over the entire site
wtthtn areas of settlem. e~t sensitive ~prcvemen~s shall be removed.
The average depth of remoYal is estimated at 3 to 4 feet, however
localized deeper removaqs may be necessary. t
S. The exploratory trench backfill should be cleaned out ~nspected by the
soils enG~nee~, processed and replaced with fil~ which has been
moisture cond~tloned tO at least optimum moisture content and compacted
to a t least 90 percent of laboratory standard.
It ts our opic~on that the report was prepared tn a competent manper consistent
w~th the present "state-Of-the-art" and satisfies the requirements o~ the
AIQ~fst-Prtolo Spade1 Studies Zones Act, the assoc(ated Riverside County
0rd~nance No. 547. FInal approval o~ this report ts hereby g~ven,
County Geologic Report Xo;, 6gZ and Eg2
ReY~sed June IS, I9g0
Page 3
~t should be noted that the re~e~eaendat$oni mmde ~n 3q}uP PepoPt nov :upePsede
the raceemendations made tn Count.v Geolog(c RapoPt No. 278 fop thtz ~pectfic
parcel, Th~s revtsto~ appltes to both the fault setback zone and liquefaction
m~igat;4on measures.
The recmmt. en~et~ons made ~n you~ repo~t shall be mdhered to (n the de=tgn and
constrdctlon of this pPo~ect.
¥e~y~rdly ~ouPs,
RIVSR~IDE COUIfT~ PLANNING DEPARTNENT
A' R~hards, Plan lng Dlrec%
Steven man, ' ' glst
C~ 1205
SAK::Jg
cc: Na~kh~ end Associates - ;da Sanchez
CDNG - [a~l
Bufid~ng & Safety - Norm Lo$tbom
Planning Team 5 - ~ohn
$TAI~ OF CALIr. OINIA--IU$1hIr~. I'It. AI,~P,C~I'TAT!ON AND HQIJ~ING A~ENCY
GEOIG~ DEUr..N~;AN. Geeme'
January 4, ~.'~'~0 JAN 0 8 1990 o;v~1 Revie,
-- iv--15--5.96/6o0
Your Reference
RIVEI~~ PP ~4
· Planning Department
Attention Mr. John Risto~
County of Riverside
4080 Lemon Street
Riverside, CA 9250~
Dear Mr. Risto~:
Thank you for the opportunity to revie- the proposed Plot Plan
No. llb~4 located between Route I-Z5 and Ynez Road, north of
Solaria Way in the Temecula area.
Please refer to the attached material on which our comments have
beem indicated by the items checked and/or used by those items
noted under additional comments.
If any ~ork is necessary ~ithin the State high,ay r~ght of
the developer must obtain an encroachment permit from the
Calftans District 8 Permit Office prior to beginning work.
If additional information is.desired, please call Mr. Thomas
Neville at (714) 585-4584.
Very truly yours,
H. N. LEWANDOWSKI
District Permits Engineer
Art
(Your Reference)
Plan checker
WE WOULD LIKE TO NOTE:
CALTRANS DEVELOPMENT REVIEW FORM
~)ate
(Co Rte PM) ~
WE REQUEST THAT THE lIE*iS CHECKED BELOW BE INCLUDED IN l'hl CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR
r Is
____ Nornml right of way dedication to provide. half-width on the state highway.
Normal street improvements to provide hal£-width on the state hiShway.
, Curb and gutter, State Standard _ along the state highway.
,,___ Parking shall be Prohibited along the state highway by Painting the curb'red
and/or by the proper placement of "no parking" signs.
----- _ radius curb' returns be provided at intersections ~ith the state hiZhway.
~standard wheelchair ramp must be Provided in the returns.
____ A Positive vehicular barrier along the property frontage shall be Provided to
limit Physical access to the state hi~hvmy.
~ Vehicular access shall not be developed directly to the scats highway.
~_ Vehicular access :o the state highway shall be provided by existin= public road
connections. ·
-___ Vehicular access to the state hiehway shall be provided by _ standard
driveuays.
ve~.,l~r =-,.-.. c~._.Urns s~l~ be paved at least within the r,.a~ ,~.,.~ay z-iSht of ~ay.
runoff to insure :nat
.4r~ r~'~ry r~i~ ac~:enuac:km st'~'~l be pmvicL~ as pm--r. of '_-a dsvelcr~mm= of uh~ i~,'o~,~ ~-Y-
~ P!~ refer no
REQUEST:
'--~,,A r,~ of any omr~uicns of a~prova! or revised approval.
WE R
EQUEST TiIE OPPO~,TU&ITY TO REVIE;: DURI."~G THE APPROVAL PROCESS:
Any pro,~_~,~-~ ~ to [,_~.ner deep ~ ~.
A ;W of ~ ~fic ~ ~~~ ;.
A ~ ~t of ~ ~ ~ T~u ~,~.
A ~ p~t of ~ ~ f~ ~ m~u ~n ~ ~ ~y n~ of ~y.
Date: January 4, 1990
Rlv-15-5.96/6.0
(Co-R=e-PM)
PP 11'694
(Your Referencej
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
The Transmittai letter, dated 12/22/89, indicates an Assessor's
Parcel number which does not agree wlth the AP number shown on
submltted site plan.
The CalTrans Right-of-Way (R/W) shall be delineated wlzh uhe
"NO ACCESS" symbc! (see State R/W maps).
The required cross-secz=ons (see attached "HANDOUT"~ shall exzend
a minimum of 15 ft. beyond both sides of the R/W line.
DATE: Dece~er 22, 1989
Assessor
Butldlng and Safety -Land Use
Building and Safety -Gradtng
Surveyor - Ken Tetch
Road Department
Health - Ralph Luchs
Ft re 'Protection
Flood Control Dtstrtct
Fish & Game
U.S, Postal Servtce- Ruth E. Davtdson
U.S. Fish & tfildltfe Services
County Superintendent of Schools
Rancbo Ca1 tfornta Water District
Eastern Hunfctpal Water Dtstrtct
California Editon - Daoug Davies
Southern California Gas
General Te.}iphone
Ca I trans' t8
City of Temecula
Temecula Union School District
RiVERbiN cc Jnc-u
PLannine DEPARtBEfit
Co~tsstoner Turner
San 5er~a~no County Ruseue
Comunt ty Pl arts
JAN 1 C 1990
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
PLANNIN0 DEPARTMENT
PLOT. PLAN 11694 - iT- 5) - E.A. 34633 -
Colbourn-Currter-Rol 1 Architecture, Peter
Noll - Rancho California Area- First
Supervisortal District - W side of Ynez
Rd., between Winchester Rd. & Solaria Way.
-C-1/C-P Zone - 3 Acres - REQUEST:
Automotive retail and service - Nod 119 -
A.P. 921-08Q~8.53,54
Please review the case described above, along with the a~te~hed case map. ALan
Division Comtttee meeting has ben .t4.ntattvely scheduled for January 18, 1990. If it
clears, it will then go to public hearing.
Your co~nents and recommendations are requested prior to January 18, 1990 in order that we
may include them in the staff report. for this particular case.
Should you have any questions regarding this item, please do not hesitate to contact
John Rtstw at 787-6356,
Planner
CO/q~ENTS:
The parcel is located on the foss111ferous Pauba Formation. Construction excavation
will impact nonrenewable paleontologlc resources.
The developer must retain a qualified vertebrate paleontologist to develop a site-specific
program to mitigate impacts *to paleontologic resources. This program should tnclude'-
D~l~: rnnn~tnr~r~ n~ ~~n hy ~ nualffied oaleOntOlOqlC monftOr: (2) preparation Of
recovered specimens, including sediment processing for small vertebrate foss$1s; (3)
P 1 '
kiA~i~r et mRes~stt~le 8. established repository= and (A) a report of fSndings wtth
r~omplete specimen inventory.
~/7/9o ~'~u~
Dr. Allan D. Grtesemer, Museums Director
RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92501
(714) 7876181
46-209 OASIS SLEET, ROOM 304
INDIO, CALIFORNIA 92201
(619) 342-8277
:IiVFDiD COUI'I
PLirl~il'ffi DEPARCI EI C
Gee So118, Xnc.
· 24890 Jefferson Avenue
P.O. Box 490
Murrieta, CA 92362
Attention: John P. Franklin
Albert R. Xleimt
SUBJECT
Alqutst-Priolo Special Studies
Zone/Li uefaction Hazard
W.O. 272-A-RC
Plot Plan 11694
A.F.N.s 949-220-004
Count Geolqlc Report No.'s 691
and
Temecula Area
Gentlemen:
we have reviewed the seismic/geologic aspects of your report
en=inled wPreltmtnar Soils end Geologic Update Report, Parcel 4
of Parcel Hap No. 2~960, off of Ynez ~oad, Tamerule, CA," dated
July 28, 1989, and your addendum dated Februar~ 27, 1990.
~our report determined thatz
No evidence for faulting was found in the area of the
previouly established fault setback zone on this site. The
potent/a1 for ground rupture at the mite is considered low.
The Wildomar fault has been mapped ~ust westerly of the
subject property. Peak horizontal ground accelerstio, from
a maximum credible earthquake of ?.S magnitude on this fault
cuuld exceed 0.78 g. Peak horizontal ground acceleration fzom
· maximu~probable earthquake on this fault could e~ceed 0.34
g®
Secondary earthquake e~feo~s of lurebinV and/or localized
ground cracking could occur at this site.
The potential ~or tsunam/ or smiths ~s no~ considered
pertinent to site development.
T~e potential for suffice flooding st the Site, litheugh
ooosLdered low, oannet be entirely preoludee.
ladLent/one of major m~aa moveeat or major landsliding have
not been observed oz zepoz~ed ear. be site,
4080 LEMON STREET, 9'rH FLOOR
RNERSIDE, CALIFORNIA g2501
Z 'J ll'0N ££:)I li&l'Cl'te
W7"33 COUNTRY C~;UB DRNE. SUn'E E
BERMUDA DUNES, CALJFORNIA 92201
16191 342-827/
Soils,
-2-
Some of the sandy sell lenses present in the vicinity o~ 20
feet at Boring 9-3 have · potential ~or liquefaction.
Subsidence due to liquefac~ion ~ould be localized to nil and
no manifestation oZ liq~efs~tion is likely to occur st or near
the greed surface.
Your repor~ raceamended ~hatf'
Structural eatbacks for faults ere not vsrranted on this site.
The potential ~or surface Elooding should be further eva~uated
b~ the des/g· engineer.
Geologic inspections should be performed during site grading
to verify geologic conditions relative to ~aulting encountered
bo~h vl~hln or outside oZ the Xlquist-Priolo Special Studies
x~ orde~ to mitigate liq~efaCtionP~enti·l and/or seismically
induced dyne-no settlement, all existing fall and topsoil over
~he entire site vi~hin areas of settlement sensitive
improvements shall be removed. The aver·re depth of removal
ie estimated a~ 3 to 4 feet, hoevet localized deeper removals
as3/be necesaar3~.
The exploratory trench back~ill should be cleaned ou~,
inspected by ~he soils engineer, processed and replaced vith
fill vhiah bee ~en moil~:vre oonditim~ed to at lease optimum
moisture oonten~ and o, xepacted to at least gO percenl: of
laboratory standard.
Zt As our eFtnAsA that ~he report usa prepared in · competent
- satisfies
manner c~neLe~ent riCh the present estate-of-the'art and
the re~luiteaents of ~he )k~cr~tet-Pz/olo lpeeLal I~udLes Zones At1:,
r, he aes~cAattdl~AvtrsideCountY 0rdenan°eN°' 647- Final approval
0£ ~his raporS As hereby given·
Xt should be noted~hat the ramsemendations made in your repor~ ~ov
supercaGe the tec;neendatAons made in County Geologic bpott We.
2~8 tot this specific parcel. This ,vision applies to both the
fault ser~mack zone anG liquefaction mLtigae~Lon measures.
Oeo IoL3, et Zno,
Narch 7~ tg90
PaVe -2 -
The reo~ends~Lone made in ~our report sh~ll be adhered to In the
deeign and construction o~ thLs project.
Very truly yours,
c,~. 14ar~ham and kssoc. - Ida Sancbes
ATTACHMENT 5
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
PARCEL MAP NO. 275~.5
CITY
J. Larry Gabele
4275 Executive Square, Suite 1040
La Jolia, CA 92037
OF TEMECULA
July 7, 1992
SUBJECT: Final Conditions of Approval For Tentative Parcel Map No. 27545
Dear Mr. Gabele:
On July 6, 1992 the City of Temecula Planning Commission approved Tentative Parcel Map No.
27545 subject to the enclosed Conditions of Approval. Tentative Parcel Map No. 27545 is a
proposed subdivision of 3.0 gross acres locat~ci on the west side of Yne, z Road and east of
Interstate 15, approximately 200 feet north of the intersection of Ynez Road and Solana Way.
Anyone dissatisfied with this decision or the Conditions of Approval may appeal it within ten
(10) worldng days from the date of approval. Caution should be exercised in making any
expenditures or commitments based upon this approval until the expiration of the appeal period
and disposition of any appeals which .may be fried.
This approval is effective until July 6, 1994 ui~less extended in accordance with Ordinance 460,
Section 8.4. Written request for a time extension must be submitted to the City of Temecula
a minimum of 30 days prior to the expiration date.
If you have any further questions regarding this subject, please contact the Planning Department
at (714) 694-6400.
Sincerely,
Assistant Planner
Debbie Ubnoske
Se.~or Planner
CO:
Debi Belmonte, Building & Safety
Bob Pigherd, Public Works
Mike Gray, Fire Department
8~STAFFRFrL~MY"TphI.F1N
45174 BUSINESS P~K DRIVE · TE.%IECtlL.~ CALIFOI~NI.~ 92590 · PHONE (714) 694-1989 · F~.× (714) 694-1999
ATTA~ NO. 2
CITY OF TEMBCUIA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Tentative Parcel Map No. 27545
Project Description: A COmmerCial subdivision of 3.0 gross acres
into three parceh.
Assessor's Parcel No. 921-080-054
PLANNING DEPAR~
The tentative subdivision shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act
and to all the requirements of Ordinance 460, Schedule E, unless modified by the
conditions listed below. A time extension may be approved in accordance with the State
Map Act and City Ordinance, upon wrillen request, if made 30 days prior to the
expiration date.
This conditionally approved tentative parcel map will expire two years after the approval
date, unless extended as provided by Ordinance 460. The expiration date is July 6,
1994.
3. Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid prior to recordation of the final map.
Legal access as required by Ordinance NO. 460 shall be provided from the Parcel Map
boundary to Ynez Road.
®
A copy of the final grading plan shall be submilled to the planning Department for
review and approval. All on-site cut and fill slopes shall:
Be limited to a maximum slope ratio of 2 to 1 and a maximum vertical height of
thirty (30) feet.
All slopes over three (3) feet in height shall be landscaped and irrigated according to the
City Development Code. A detailed landscaping and irrigation plan, prepared by a
qunlified professional, shall be submitted to the City Planning Department for review and
approval prior to issuance of building permits.
s
The applicant shall comply with the environmental health recommendations outlined in
the County Health Depanment's transmittal dated May 28, 1992, a copy of which is
alnched.
S~TA~545TPM.PC
11
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
The applicant shall comply with the fire improvement recommendations outlined in the
County Fire Department's letter dated June 24, 1992, a copy of which is attached.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Department of
Transponation's transmittal dated June 1, 1992, a copy of which is attached.
The applicant shall 'comply with the recommendations outlined in the Rancho Californi~
Water District transmittal dated l'une 15, 1992, a copy of which is attached. '
Lots created by this subdivision shall comply with the following:
A. Lots created by this subdivision shall be in conformance with the development
standards of the Scenic Highway Commercial zone.
B. Graded but undeveloped land shall be maintained in a we~l-free condition and
shall be either planted with interim landscaping or provided with other erosion
control measures as approved by the Director of Building and Safety.
The developer shall be responsible for maintenance and upkeep of all slopes, landscaped
areas and irrigation systems until such time as those operations are the responsibilities
of other parties as approved by the Planning Director.
Prior to recordation of the Final map, an Environmental Constraints Sheet ('ECS) shall
be prepared in conjunction with the final map to delineate identified environmental
concerns and shall be permanen~y fried with the office of the City Engineer. A copy of
the ECS shah be transmitted to the Planning Deparunent for review and approval. The
approved F_.CS shall be forwarded with copies of the recorded fin31_ map to the Planning
Department and the Department of Building and Safety.
The following notes shall be placed on the Environmental Constraints Sheet:
A. "This property is located within thirty (30) miles of Mount Palomar Observatory.
All proposed outdoor lighting systems shall comply with the Californi3 Institute
of Technology, Palomar Observatory Outdoor Lighting policy as outlined in the
Southwest Area Community Plan."
B. "Drainage easements shall be kept free of buildings and obstructions."
Prior to the issuance of GRAftING PERMTrS the following conditions shall be satisfied:
Delineate techniques which will be utilized to prevent erosion and sedimentation
during and after the grading process.
Provide approximate time frames for grading and identification of areas which
may be graded during the higher probability rain months of January through
March.
12
16.
C. Provide prelirninni'y pad and roadway elevations.
D. Identify areas of temporary grading outside of a particular phase.
Prior to the issuance of BUILDING PERMITS the following conditions shall be satisfied:
Ae
All building plans for all new structures shall incorporam all required elements
from the rue protection plan as approved by the County Fire Marshal.
B. Roof-mounted equipment Sh~ll be shielded from view of surrounding property.
17.
Prior to the issuance of OCCUPANCY PERMITS the following conditions shall be
~ti.~ed:
Ae
All landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in accordance with approved plans
and shall be vexifmd by City field inspection prior to the issuance of occupancy
permiU. If seasonal conditions do not permit planting, interim landscaping and
erosion control measures shall be utiliTed as approved by the Planning Director
and the Director of BUilding and Safety.
18.
The subdivider shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Temecuh, its
agents, officer, and employees from any clnim, action, or proceeding against the City of
Temecula or its agents, officer, or employees to attach, set aside, void, or nnnul an
approval of the City of Temecula, its advisory agencies, appeal boards or legishtive body
concerning Tentative Parcel Map No. 27545, which action is brought within the time
period provided for in Cnllfomia Government Code Section 66499.37. The City of
Temecuh will promptly notify the subdivider of.any such clnim, action, or proceeding
against the City of Temecuh and will cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to
promptly notify the subdivider of any such clnlrn, action, or proceeding or fnil.~ to
cooperate fully in the defense, the subdivider shall not, thereafter, be responsible to
defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City of Temecula.
19.
All utility systems including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer, and cable TV shall
be provided for underground, with casements pwvided as required, and designed and
constructed in accordance with City Codes and the utility pwvider. Telephone, cable TV
and/or security systems shall be pre-wired.
20. All utilities, except electrical lines rated 33kv or greater, shall be instnlled underground.
Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions/Reciprocal Access Easements:
21.
No lot shall be sold unless a corporation, association, property owner' s group, or similnr
entity has been formed with the right to assess all properties individually owned orjointiy
owned which have any rights or interest in the use of the common areas and common
facilities in the development, such assessment power to be sufficient w meet the expenses
of such entity, and with authority to control, and the duty to maintain, all of said ·
mutually available features of the development. Such entity shall operate under recorded
s~r~s~s'n,~.~ 13
CC&R's which shall inclu~ compulsory membership of all owners of lots and flexibility
of assessments to meet changing costs of maint~mce, repairs, and services. Recorded
CC&R's shall permit enforcement by the City of Provisions required by the City as
Conditions of Approval. The developer shall submit evidence of compliance with this
requirement to, and receive approval of, the City prior to making any such sale. This
condition shall not apply to land dedicated to the City for public purposes.
22. Every owner of a lot shall own as an appurtenance to such or lot, either (I) an undivided
interest in the common areas and facilities, or (2) as share in the corporation, or voting
membership in an association, owning the common areas and facilities.
23. Maintenance for all landscaped and open areas shall be provided for in the CC&R's.
24. Tentative Parcel Map No. 27545' will need to comply with any and all Conditions of
Approval for Conditional Use Permit No. 2, Conditional Use Permit No. 2, Revised No.
I and Conditional Use Permit No. 2, Revised No. 1, Extension of Time.
25. Any future building located on Parcels No. 2 and No. 3 will be separated.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
The following are the Depaxtment of Public Works Conditions of Approval for this project, and
shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. Previously imposed requirements for
'Conditional Use Permit No. 2, Revised No. 1, shall apply except as amended or superseded by
the following conditions of approval. All que, stions regarding the true m~aning of the conditions
shall be referred to the appropriate staff person of the Department of :Public Works.
It is understood that the Subdivider has correctly shown'on the tentative map all existing and
proposed easements, traveled ways, improvements constraints and drainage courses, and their
omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and revision.
PRIOR TO RECORDATION OF THE FINAL MAP:
26.
27.
Pursuant to Section 66493 of the Subdivision Map-Act, any subdivision which is pan of
an existing Assessment District must comply with the requirements of said section.
As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
Rancho Californla~ Water District;
Eastern Municipal Water District;
Riverside County Flood Control Distria;
City of Temecuh Fire Bureau;
Planning Department;
Depamnent of Public Works;
Riverside County Health Department;
CATV Franchise;
SWTAFFRFr~4ST1,M.I;C
14
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
CalTrans;
Tcmccuh Community Services District;
General Telephone;
Southern C.~lifornia F~lison Company; and
Southern C~llfornia Gas Company.
All road easements and/or street dedications shall be offered for dedication to the public '
and shall continue in force until the City acccpts or abandons such offers. All
dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as appwved by the DcparUnent of Public
Works.
Ynez Road shall be dediated with 67 feet of right-of-way in accordance with City of
Temecuh Standard No. 100A, (134/110).
In the cvent off-site easements or n'Zht-of-way are required W comply with these
conditions, such easements shall be obtnined by the developer;, or, in the event the City
is required to condemn the cascmcnt or right-of-way, as provided in the Subdivision Map
Act, the developer shall enter inW an agrecmcnt with the City for the acquisition of such
cascmcnt at the devclopcr's cost pursuant to Government Code Section 66462.5, which
shall be at no cost to the City.
Vehicular access shall be restricted on Yncz Road and so noted on the final map with the
exception of one access point as appwved by the Depaxhuent of Public Works and as
shown on the tentative map.
Basements, when requited for roadway slopes, landscapc cascmcnts, dninagc facilities, ·
utilities, etc., shall be shown on the final map if they arc located within the land division
boundary. All offers of dedication and conveyances shall be submitted and recorded as
directed by the Department of Public Works.
A declaration of Covcnants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&R's) shall be prepax~l by
the developer and submitted to the Director of planning, City EnZineer and City
Attorney. The CC&R's shall be siEned and acknowledged by all parties having any
record rifle interest in the property to be developed, shall make the City a party thereto,
and shall be enforceable by the City. The CC&R's shall be revicwed and appwved by
the City and recorded. The CC&R's shall be subject to the following Bnginccring
conditions:
A. The CC&R's shall be preparetl at the dcvclopcr's sole cost and expense.
The CC&R's shall be in the form and content appwved by the Direaor of
planning, City Bn~ineer and the City AUomcy, and shall include such pwvisions
as are required by thi.~ approval and as said offici~l-~ decxn necessary to protect
the interest of the City and its residents.
The CC&R's and Articles of Incorporation of the Property Owncr's Association
are subject w the approval of Planning, Department of. Public Works, 'and the
SWrAPFRF1'~/545Tl'M.l'C
15
34.
35.
City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrent with the final map. A
recorded copy shall be provided to the City.
The CC&R's shall provide for the effective establishment, operation,
management, use, repair and maintenance of all drive aisles, surface drainage and
related facilities.
The CC&R's shall provide tha_t the property shah be developed, operated and
maintained so as not to create a public nuisance.
The CC&R's shall provide that if the property is not maintained in the condition
required by the CC&R's, then the City, afar maiclng due demand and giving
reasonable notice, may enter the property and perform, at the owner's sole
expense, any maintenance required thereon by the CC&R's or the City
ordinances. The property shall be subject to a lien in favor of the City to secure
any such expense not promp~y reimbursed.
The declaration shah contain language prohibiting further subdivision of
any lots, whether they are lettered lots or numbered lots.
All parkways, drainage facilities, and landscaping shall be pennanen~y
maintained by the association or othex means acceptable to the City. Such
proof of this maintenance shall be submitted to Planning and the
Department of Public Works prior to issuance of building permits.
Reciprocal access easements and maintenance agreements ensuring access
to all parcels and joint maintenance of all roads, drives or parldng areas
shall be provided by CC&R's or by deeds and shall be recorded
concurrent with the map.
The subdivider shall construct or post security and an agreement shall be executed
guaranteeing the construction of the foilowing public improvements in conformance with
applicable City standards.
Street improvements, including, but not limited to: pavement, curb and gutter,
medians, sidewalks, drive approaches, street lights, signing, striping, and other
Waffic control devices as appropriate.
B. Drainage facilities.
C. Landscaping (slopes and parkway).
D. Sewer and domestic water systems.
The street design and improvement concept of this project shall be coordinsted with
adjoining developments.
S~tAFFRFI'~545TpM. pC
16
'Lti
36.
37.
38.
39.
42.
43.
o~-45.
Street lights shall be provided along streets adjoining the subject sit: in accordance with
the requirements of Ordinance No. 461 and as approvrxl by the Depaxtment of Public
Works.
Prior to recordation of the final map, the developer shall deposit with the Depa_rnnent of
Public Works a cash sum as established, per lot, ,as mitigation towards Waffle signal
impacts. Should the developer choose to defer the time of payment of traffic signal
mitigation fee, he may enter inw a written agreement with the City deferring said
payment W the time of issuance of a building permit.
All driveway centerline intenections shall be at 90 degrees or as approved by the
Department of Public Works.
Impwvement plans shall be based upon a centerline pwfile extending a minimum of 300
feet beyond the project boundaries at a grade and alignment as approved by the
Department of Public Works.
A minimum centerline street grade shah be 0.50 percent.
All driveways shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula standards and shnll be
shown on the improvement plans in accordance with City Standard 207A and 401 (curb
sidewhile).
On-site drainage facilities, located outside of road right-of-way, shall be contained within
drainage easements shown on the final map. A note shall be added to the final map
stating '~ easements sinall be kept free of buildings and obstructions."
Adequate pwvisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drnlnage
entering the property from adjacent areas.
The subdivider shall protect downstream properties from damages caused by alteration
of the drainage panems; i.e., concentration or diversion of flow. Protection shall be
provided by constructing adequat~ drainage facilities, including enlarging existing
facilities or by securing a drainage easement.
Prior to final map, the subdivider Shnll notify the City's CATV Franchises of the Intent
to Develop. Conduit shall be installed to CATV Standards at time of street
improvements.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMIlS:
Prior to issuance of a grading permit, developer must fulfill the requirements of the
National Pollutant Discharge ~llminntion System (NPDE5) permit from the State Water
Resources Control Board. No grading shall be permitted until a NPDES clearance is '
granted or the project is shown to be exempt.
S%$TAFFRFl'~7545TPM.PC
17
47.
Prior to any work being 'performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and an
encroachment permit shall be obtained from the Depax~ent of Public Works.
48.
Prior to any work being performed on the private streets or drives, fees shall be paid and
a construction permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works.
49.
A grading permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any grading outside of the City-maintained road right-of-way.
50.
No grading shall take place prior to the improvement plans being substantially complete,
appropriate clearance ]~tters have been obtained, and approval of the grading plan has
been granted by the Department of Public works.
51.
If grading is to take place between the months of October and April inclusive, erosion
control and runoff mitigation plans will be requirexl. All plans slnall be submitted with
appropriate notes as di_rex:ted and approved by the Department of Public Works.
A flood mitigation cl~rgc sinall be paid. The chnrgC shnll equal the prevailing Area
Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new development. The clnarge is
payable to the Flood Control Distri~ prior to issuance of permits. If the full Area
Drainn~e Plan fee or mitigation charge ~ alr~dy credited to tiffs property, no new
charge needs to be paid.
.53.
An encroachment permit shall be required from CalTrans for any work within their right-
of-way.
54.
A permit from the County Flood Control District is required for work within their right-
of-way.
PRIOR TO BUrLDING PEILMrr:
55.
A praise grading plan shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review
and approval. The building pad shall be. certified by a registered Civil Engineer for
location and elevation, and the Soils Engineer shall issue a Final Soils Report addressing
compaction and site conditions.
56.
Grading of the subject properry shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code,
City Gradlug Standards and accepted grading practices. The final gradlug plan shall be
in substantial couformance with the appwved rough grading plau.
o~c 57.
Developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvcmcnts and public facilities imposcd
upon the property or project, including that for tnffic and public facility mitigation as
required under the l:~l~fNegative Declaration for the project. The fee to be paid shall
be in the mount in effect at the time of payment of the fee. If an interim or final public
facility mitigation fee or district has not been finally established by the date on which
developer requcsts its building permits for the project or any phase thereof, the developer
shall execute the Agreement for payment of Public Facility fee, a copy of which has been
$~TAFFRFI'~/54$TpM.pC
18
provided to devcloper. C]oncurrentiy, with executing this Agreement, developer shall
post se~ufity to secur~ paymcnt of thc Publi~ F~ty fee. The mount of the se~:ufity
shall be $2.00 per square foot, not to cxceed $10,000. Devcleper understands that said
Agreement may require the payment of fees in excess of those now estlma,e~l (assuming
benefit to the project in the mount of such fees). By execration of thin Agn~meut,
developer will waive any fight to protest the provisions of fhi.~ Condition, of this
Agreement, the formation of any Watfxc impact fee district, or the process, levy, or
ex~llection of any traffic mitigation or traffic impa~ fee for this project; provided that
developer is not waiving its fight to protest the reasonableness of any traffic impact fee,
and the mount thereof.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERT]I~CATES OF OCCUPANCY:
Construct full street improvements including but not limited to, curb and gutter, A.C.
pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway trees and street lights.
59.
Existing city roads requiring construction sbnll remnln open to traffic at all times with
adequate detours during construction. Traffic control plans shall be provided as directed
by the Department of Public Works, and may be required to be prepared by a registered
Civil Engineer.
Transportation Engineerin2
PPJOR TO RECORDATION OF THE FXNAL MAP:
60.
If required a signing and striping plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer ·
and approved by the Department of Public Works for Ynez Road and shall be included
in the street improvement plnn.~.
61.
Prior to designing any of the above plans, contact Transportation Engineering for the
design requirements.
74 ~62.
Bus bays will be provided at all existing and future bus stops as determined by the
Deparunent of Public Works.
PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ANY ENCROA~ PERMITS:
63.
A construction area traffic control pl.. shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer
and approved by the City Engineer for any street closure and dewur or other disruption
to traffic circulation as required by the Department of Public Works.
PRIOR TO TRE ISSUANCE OF OCCUPANCY PERNIITS:
64. All siffni ng and striping shall be insUdled per time approved signing and striping plan.
65.
Landscaping shall be limited in the comer cut-off area of all inter~octions of adjacent to
driveways to provide for minimum sight distance.
s~r^m.n'~usv?M.?c 19
TO:
FROM:
RE:
County oI .K vers e
-. DEPARTMENT OF,HEALTH
C I TY OF TEMECULA
: a ew . a_ an
DATE:
Health Specialist IV
SAN 53 REOUIRENKNTS - TENTATIVE PARCEL NAP N0. 27545
CITY OF TEMECULA
05-28-92
The Department of Environmental Health Division has
reviewed the Tentative Parcel Map No. 27545 rot this
project and cannot make any recommendations until a
sanitation letter is filed. The requirements for a SAN
53 letter are as follows:
Should the project be served sanitary sewer+services.
this Department would need only:
A "will-serve" letter from the aqency/agencies
serving potable water and sanitary sewers.
2. One copy of the Parcel Map.
SM:dr
FIRE DEPARTMENT
210 WE~ ~ ~ AVENUE * PEKEL~, CAL.IFOR~ g2ZTrl
., (714) fd"/-3Ig3 :'. ~'
TO:
CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
ATTN:
Matthew Fagan
RE:
Parcel Map 27545
With respect to the conditions of approval for the above refer-
enced land division, the Fire Department recommends the following
fire protection measures be provided in accordance with.Riverside
County Ordinances and/or recognized fire protection standards:
FIRE PROTECTION
The water mains ehall be capable of providing a pote~tiai
fire flow 5000 GPM and. an actual fire flow availa~'i~ from
any one hydrant shall be 2500 GPM for 2 hours duration at 20
PSI residual operating pressure.
Approved super fire hydrants, (6"x4"x2 1/2"x2 1/2*')'shall
be located at each street intersection and spaced not more
than 550 feet apart in any directiOn-, with no portion of any
lot frontage more' than 165 feet ~r6m a fire hydrant.
The applicant/developer shall provide written certification
from the appropriate water company that the required fire
hydrants are either e~:isting or that financial arrangements
have been made to provide them.
Applicant/Developer shall furnish one copy of the
~ater system plans to the Fire Department for review.
Plans shall be signed by a registered civil engineer,
containing a Fire Dep;rtment approval signature block,
and shall confor~ to hydrant type, location, spacinO
and minimum fire flow. Once plans are signed by
local water companym the originals shall be presented to
the Pire Department for signature.
3'760 lhhSemm..JLi-wabTr-C~sgT-,q3l
(714) 27~J'~/'7 · ~AX (714) 369-7451
RE: Page 2
The required water system, including fire hydrants, shall be
installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency
prior to any combustible building material being placed on
an individual lot.
All questions regarding the meaning of conditions shall
ferred to the Riverside County Fire Department Planning
staff.
b~ re-
Division
RAYMOb9 H. REGIS
Chief Fire Department Planner
BD:js
Fire Safety Specialist
7!
'STATE OF CAUFORNIA---BU$1NESS, TRAN$PORI..~rlON AND HOUSING AGENCY
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
'DISTRICT 8, P.O. IOX 231 ';
SAN IEINARDINO, C.A, Ur-.(Z~INIA 9240'2
TDD (714) 313-,~609
June 1; 1992
V ~'~.'~ ,~ U i~ PETE wILSON,
Far. Matthew Fagan
Planning Department
City of Temecula
City. Hall
43172 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92390
Development Review
08-Riv-15-5.98/6.02
Your Reference:
TPM 27545
Dear Mr. Fagan:
Thank you for the opportunity to review the proposed
Tentative Parcel Map No. 27545 located adjacent to the
northeasterly side of 1-15 westerly of Ynez Road, between Rancho
California Road and Winchester Road in Temecula.
Please refer to the attached material on which our comments
have been indicated by the items checked and/or by those/items
noted under additional comments. '
If any work is necessary within the State highway right of
way, the developer must obtain an encroachment permit from the
Calftans District 8 Permit Office prior to beginning work.
Please be advised that this is a conceptual review Only.
Final approval of street improvement, grading and drainage will
be determined during the Encroachment Permit process.
If additional information is desired, please call Mr. Ahmad
Salah of our Development Review Section st (714) 383-4384.
G. A. LUNT
Branch Chief,
Development Review
Attachment
STEVEN WISNIEWSKI
PLAN CHECICER
DATE
( CO RT~ PM)
WE REQUEST THAT THE ITEMS CHECKED BELOW BE INCLUDED IN THE CONDITIONS OF
APPROVAL FOR THIS PROJECT:
/NOR~L RIGHT OF VAT DEDICATION TO PROVIDE//:~It/jALF'VIDTH ON THE STATE HIGHVAT.
NORMAL STREET IMPROVEMENTS TO PROVIDE
HALF--VIDTN ON THE STATE HIGHVAT.
CURB AND GUTTER, STATE STANDARD N8-A , TYPE A2-8 ~ONG THE STATE HIGHVAT.
PARI~iNG SHALL BE PROHIBITED ALONG THE STATE HIGHVAT BY THE PROPER PLACEMENT OF NO PARI,'IHG SIGNS.
35 eft RADIUS C~JR8 RETURNS SHALL BE PROVIDED AT INTERSECTIONS VITH THE"STATE HIGHVAT. STATE STANDARD NB-B,
CASE-A VHEELCHAIR RAMPS SHALL BE PROVIDED IN TKE CURB RETURNS AS DEFINED IN THE N1GNUAT DESIGN M~t,"JAL,
SECTION 105.4 (2).
A POSITIVE VEHICULAR BARRIER ALONG THE PROPERTY FRONTAGE SHALL BE PROVIDED TO LIMIT PHYSICAL ACCESS TO THE
STATE HIGHVAT.
VEHICULAR ACCESS SHALL NOT BE DEVELOPED DIRECTLT TO THE STATE HIGi~AT.
VEHICULAR ACCESS TO THE STATE HIGHVAT SHALL BE PROVIDED BY EXISTING PUBLIC ROAD CONNEC.TIONS.
/'-
VEHIcuLAR ACCESS TO THE STATE NIGIfi,IAT SHALL BE PROVIDED BY STAk'DARD DRIVEVATS.
VEHIQXAR Ar.,~$S SHALL NOT BE PROVIDED UITMIH
THE INTERSeCtiON AT
VEHICULAR ACCESS TO THE STATE HIGHWAY SHALL BE PROVIDED BT.._A ROAD--TTPE CONNECTION,
VEHICULAR ACCESS CONNECTIONS SHALL BE PAVED AT LEAST VITHIH THE STATE HIGI~JAT RIGHT OF VAT,
ACCESS POINTS TO THE STATE HIGHVAT SHALL BE DEVELOPED IN A NANHER THAT gILL PROVIDE 51GNT DISTAHC= FOR __
MPN ALONG 1HE STATE HIGHVAT.
LANDSCAPING ALONG THE STATE HIGHVAT SHALL PROVIDE FOR SAFE SIGHT DISTANCE e CONPLT VITH FIXED OBJECT SET BAC~
AND BE TO STATE STANDARDS,
A LEF1--TURN LANE t INCLUOING SHGULDERS AND ANT NECESSARY V[DENING; SHALL BE PROVIDED ON THE STATE HIGWJAT,
A TRAFFIC STUDT INDICATING ON AND OFF--SITE FLC~ PATTERNS AND VOLUMES, PRObABlE IMPACTS AND PROPOSED MITIGAIICN
MEASURES SHALL BE PREPARED.
PAR~ING SHALL BE DEVELOPED IN A NANHER THAT gILL NOT CAUSE ANT VEHICULAR MOVEMENT CONFLICTS, IKCL;,,OIHG PAIlICING
STALL ENTRANCg, AND EXIT t UITNIN OF THE ENTRANCE FROM THE STATE NIGHVAT,
CARE SHALL BE TAKEN UHEN DEVELOPING THIS PROPERTT TO PRESERVE AND PERPETUATE THE EXISTING DaAINAGE pATTERN
OF THE STATE NIGIPJAY, PARTICULAR CONSIDERATION SHOULD BE GIVEN TO C~LATIVE INCREASED STORM RUI~CFF TO IHSUR-c
THAT A HIG~AT DRAINAGE PROBLEM I$ NOT CREATED,
PLEASE REFER TO ATTACHED ADDITIONAL CONNEHTS. PROVIDE TO APPLICANT.
PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL REVIEW ONLY. FINAL APPROVAL WILL
BE DETERMINED DURING THE ENCROACHMENT PERMIT PROCESS.
,TOL~WINGTj.iTE,~-~RE'T.~p~L~.C. ABLE Td','~OC~"rT~'GENC'Y'~LANNERS/ENGI){EERS
_Z C Ce4STRUCTION/DEMOLITION I/ITHIH PRESENT OR PRC. E-C.~ED STATE RIGHT OF i/AT SHOULD BE INVESTIGATED FOR POTEN~,..~,..,
HAZARDOUS I/ASTE ( I, E - ASBESTOS t PETROCHEMICAI.$ ~. ETC, ) AND NIT]rATED AS PER REQUIREJ~NTS OF RECRJLATORT AGENCI'
/T~qMEN PLANS ARE SUB~ITTEDt PLEASE CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ATTACHED IfX'T~JT~'f THIS TILL EXPEDITE
THE REVIEI/PROCESS AND TIME REQUIRED FOR PLAN CHECX, PROVIDE TO APPLICANT.
.,,. .
ALTHOUGH THE TRAFFIC ,' __ '" GENERATED BT THIS PROPOSAL D OT APPEAR TO NAVE A SIGNIFICANT EFFECT
OH THE STATE NIGW,,,rAY SYSTEM# C~$IDERATION leJST BE GIVEN TO THE CI.14ULATIVE EFFECT OF CONTINUED DEVELOPMEHT
IN THIS AREA, 2}UIY MEASURES NECESSARY TO MITIGATE THE CXJleJLAT]VE IMPACT OF TRAFFIC ' _ SMALL BE
PROVIDED PRIOR TO OR I/ITH DEVELOPMENT OF THE AREA THAT NECESSITATES THEM,
CONSIDERATION SMALL BE GIVEN TO THE PROVISION,, OR FUTURE PROVISIQM t OF SIGNILIZATIOR AND LIGHTING OF THE
IMTERS~CTI~4 0[ AM) THE STATE HIGIfJAT 1,HEM 14AJ~TS ARE ~T,
IT APPEARS THAT THE 8 DRAINAGE GENERATED BY THIS PROPOSAL COULD HAVE A SIGNIFICANT EFFECT
THE STATE HIGHI/AT SYSTEM OF THE AREA, .ANY MEASURES TO MITIGATE THE ql~ DRAINAGE IMPACTS SHALL BE
INCLUDED I/ITH THE DLrVELOPHEWT*
THIS PORTION OF THE STATE HIGHgAY IS INCLUDED IN THE CALIFORHIA PLASTER PLAN OF STATE HIGHgAYS ELIGIBLE FOR
OFFICIAL SCENIC HIGHUAY DESIGNATION AND IH THE FUTURE TaJR AGENCT MAY I/ISH TO NAVE THIS ROUTE OFFICIALLY
DESIGNATED AN A STATE SCENIC HIG.WJAY,
THIS PORTION OF THE STATE HIGHgAY HAS BEEN OFFICIALLY DESIGNATED AS A STATE Sr'fNI-C_HIGHVAYr AND DEVELOPMENT
THIS CORRIDOR SHOULD BE CCX4PATIBLE UITH THE SCENIC HIGIfi/AY COlleaPT-
iT IS RECOGNIZED THAT THERE IS CDNSIOERAILE PUILIC CONCERN ABOUT NOISE LEVELS AdJACeNT TO HEAVILY TRA"'," "ED
HIGHVATS, I.AND DEVELOPMEHT t IN ORDER TO BE L'CI~PATIBLE i/ITH THIS CONCERH~. MAT REQUIRE SPECIAL NOISE
MEASURES. DEVELOI~qENT OF THIS PROPERTY SHOULD INClUDE AN1' NECkSSAltY NOISE ATTENUATION-
CALTRA.NS DISTRICT 8
DEVELOPMENT REVIEV BRAHCH
P.O. Box 231
SAM BERNARDINO~. CA' 92402
,/
A coPY OF ANY CCIiDITIONS OF APPROVAL OR REVISED APPROVAL,
A coPY OF ANY DCX=JNENT$ pROVIDING ADDITIONAL STATE HIGH%/AT RIGHT OF lakY UPON RECORDATIOR OF THE HAP,
~Zh, N~ PROPOSALS" TO FURTHER DEVELOP THIS PROPERT1'.
A COPY OF THE. TRAFFIC OR ENVIRONRENTAL STUDY,
,~ A CHECX PRINT OF THE PARCEL CR TRACT MAP,
A CHECIC PRINT OF THE PLANS FON ANY IMPRCh~MENT$ i/lTNIN OR ADJAC~IIT TO THE STATE HIGHVAT RIGHT OF gAY-
A CHEC]C PRINT OF THE GRADING AMO DRAINAGE PLANS FOR THIS PROPERTY %,'HEN AVAILABLE-
June 15, 1992
.ECEIVED
J U N 1 7 1992
John F, Hennilsr
Phillip I_ Forbes
Tresmu.~
F_ P. 'Bob' ldmmu
Kenneth C. Dmaiy
P~rm-y R. ~
~ler
M.r. Matthew Fagan
City of Tcmccuh
Planning Department
43180 Business Park Drive
Tcmccula, CA 92590
Water Availability
Parcel Map 27545
Dear lVlx. Faran:
Please be advised that the above-referenced property is located within the
boundaries of Rancho California Water District CRCWD). Water service,
therefore, would be available upon completion of financial arrangements
between RCWD and the property owner. /-'- ·
Water availability would be contingent upon the property owner signing an
Agency Agreement which assigns water management fights, ff any, to
RCWD.
ff you have any questions, please contact Ms. Senga Doherty..
Sincerely,
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT
Steve Brannon, P. E.
Manager of Development Engineering
$1:$O:aIZ13/F186
ee: Senga Dohcrty, Engineering Technician
Rmneho Califm. wls Wetmr DiMPier
ATTACHMENT 6
FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT
CITY OF TEMECULA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT
PARCEL MAP No. 27545
DATE: Auqust 17,1992
IMPROVEMENTS
FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE
SECURITY
Streets and Drainage $ 0.00
Water $ 0.00
Sewer $ 0.00
TOTAL $ 0.00
MATERIAL F, LABOR
SECURITY
$ 0.00
$ 0.00
$ 0.00
$
*Raintenance Retention (10'4 for one year)
*(or Bonds if work is cmpleted)
$0.00
Monument Security
City Traffic Signing and Striping Costs
Fire Mitigation Fee
RCFC Drainage Fee
Signalization Mitigation Fee - SMD
Road and Bridge Benefit Fee
Other Developer Fees ( Quimby )
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
2112.00
-0-
7485.25
5,910.00
7500. O0
-0-
N/A
Planning Department Fee
Comprehensive Transportation Plan Fee
Plan Check Fee
inspection Fee
Monument Inspection Fee
$
$
$
$
$
104.00
8.00
810.00
0.00
250.00
Total Inspection/Plan Check Fees
Less Fees Paid To Date {Credit)
Total inspection/Plan Check Fees Due
1172.00
1172.00
-0-
AGENDAS/ARO06
CITY OF TEMECULA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT
PARCEL MAP No. 275q5
DATE: Auqust 17,1992
IMPROVEMENTS
FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE
SECURITY
, Streets and Drainacle $ 0.00
Water $ 0.00
Sewer $ 0.00
TOTAL $ 0.00
MATERIAL ~; LABOR
SECURITY
$ 0.00
$ 0.00
$ 0.00
$
feRaintenance Retention (lOll for ore 3mar)
re(or Bonds tf ~ork is completed)
$0.00
Monument Security
City Traffic Signing and Striping Costs
Fire Mitigation Fee
RCFC Drainage Fee Due
Signalization Mitigation Fee - SMD
Road and Bridge Benefit Fee
Other Developer Fees (Quimby)
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
2112.00
-0-
5,910.00
7500. O0
-0-
N/A
Planning Department Fee
Comprehensive Transportation Plan Fee
Plan Check Fee
Inspection Fee
Monument Inspection Fee
10L~. 00
8.00
810.00
0.00
250. O0
Total Inspection/Plan Check Fees
Less Fees Paid To Date (Credit)
Total Inspection/Plan Check Fees Due
$
$
$
1172.00
1172.00
-0-
AGENDAS/ARO06 ~
ITEM NO. 7
APPROVAL ~--
CITY ATTORNEY ~>t"/~"
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER ~ /
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
,,~,~Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
September 8, 1992
"No Parking" Zones on Jefferson Avenue North of Winchester Road
PREPARED BY: Ben Dobbins, Traffic Engineer Consultant
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 92-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ESTABLISHING "NO PARKING" ZONES IN THE
AREA ADJACENT TO JEFFERSON AVENUE BETWEEN
WINCHESTER ROAD AND NORTHERLY CITY LIMITS
BACKGROUND:
Jefferson Avenue is classified as a Major Highway, 76' wide from curb to curb. The average
daily traffic for Jefferson Avenue north of Winchester Road is 14,200. The posted speed limit
is 50 mph (85 percentile= 51 mph). The area adjacent to Jefferson Avenue between
Winchester Road and the northerly city limits is zoned commercial/industrial. Approximately
1,000 ft. north of Winchester Road a bridge exists fo~, the Santa Gertrudis Creek. North of
the bridge exists mostly vacant graded land with some commercial developments. Only one
development north of the bridge has access onto Jefferson Avenue at the present time. The
area from the bridge south to Winchester Road is fully developed.
The Traffic Engineering Staff field-investigated the existing parking conditions on Jefferson
Avenue north of Winchester Road and found that parking is allowed on both sides of
Jefferson Avenue except on the bridge per the Vehicle Codes Section 22500(k) and an
approximately 100 ft. section of red curb on the east side of Jefferson Ave. Staff has
observed vehicles parking on the bridge and recommends that red curb be painted on the
bridge. Between Sanborn Avenue and Winchester Road there exist two commercial driveways
on the west side and four commercial driveways on the east side of Jefferson Avenue. At
the intersection of Jefferson Avenue & Winchester Road there exists a 10 ft.-wide striped
-1- pwO2\agdrpt~92~OgOB~tr,,ffic\jeffers.pkg 0831
southbound right-turn lane without any restriction of parking. Therefore, parking restrictions
for the southbound right-turn lane are needed.
There were two reported accidents in the subject area in the years of 1990 and 1991. Both
accidents involved vehicles exiting the commercial driveways onto Jefferson Avenue. To date
for the year of 1992, there has not been a reported accident in the subject area.
Due to the vehicle congestion and sight distances associated with existing commercial
driveways on Jefferson Avenue north of Winchester Road, the Traffic and Transportation
Commission at the July 22, 1992 meeting recommended to the City Council that parking be
restricted on both sides of Jefferson Avenue. The parking restricting limits would be 420 ft.
on the west and 470 ft. on the east side of Jefferson Avenue north of Winchester Road and
on both side of Jefferson Avenue at the Santa Gertrudis Creek Bridge.
FISCAL IMPACT:
FY92-93 Impact: Install approximately 10 "No Parking At Any Time" (R26) signs (10 ea. x
$1 00.00/ft. = $1,000). Remove existing red curb (100 ft. x $1.00/ft. = $100). Paint 256
ft. of red curb (256 ft. x $1 .00/ft. -- $256.00). Therefore, the total FY92-93 impact is
$1,356. Funds are available in the Public Works Signing and Striping Fund (Account Nos.
164-5244 and 164-5410).
Attachments:
Exhibit "A"
Resolution
-2- pwO2\agdrpt%92~O908~traffic\jeffers.pkg 0902
WIN C' HES / z:/'r' I~ ~.
1, T
RF~OLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING "NO PARKING" ZONES
IN THE AREA ADJACENT TO JEFFERSON AVENUE
BETWEEN WINCHES~ ROAD AND NORTHERLY CITY
LIMITS
The City Council of the City of Temecula does resolve, determine and order as follows:
Section 1. Pursuant to Section 12.08.223 of the Municipal Code, the following "No
Parking" zones are hereby established in the City of Temecula:
No parking on the west side of Jefferson Avenue from a point 35 ft. north
of the north curb line of Winchester Road to 420 ft. north.
No parking on the west side of Jefferson Avenue from a point 833 ft.
north of the north curb line of Winchester Road to 128 ft. north.
Co
No parking on the east side of Jefferson Avenue from a point 35 ft. north
of the north curb line of Winchester Road to 470 ft. north.
No parking on the east side of Jefferson Avenue from a point 816 ft. north
of the north curb line of Winchester Road to 128 ft. north.
Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTFJ), by the City Council of the City of Temecula
at a regular meeting held on the 8th of September, 1992.
ATTEST:
Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor
June S. Greek
City Clerk
[SEAL]
-1- p:~wkV~,dkm.pk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE)
CITY OF TEMECULA)
SS
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that
Resolution No.__-__ was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 8th day of September, 1992, by the following
vote:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
-2- p:~mahlitwk~sffms.l~l
ITEM
NO.
8
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
~im D. Serlet. Director of Public Works/City Engineer
September 8, 1992
"No Parking" Zones on Moreno Road
PREPARED BY:
Ben Dobbins, Traffic Engineer Consultant
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 92-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ESTABLISHING "NO PARKING" ZONES ON MORENO
ROAD
BACKGROUND:
On May 4, 1992 the owner of the Kentucky Fried Chicken establishment requested the
installation of red and green curbs to prohibit parking around his establishment to improve
sight visibility and eliminate trucks from parking overnight.
Moreno Road is classified as a Secondary Highway, 64 ft. wide curb to curb. The posted
speed limit is 25 mph. The area adjacent to Moreno Road is zoned for commercial. In the
immediate vicinity are three (3) restaurants, two (2) motels, and a commercial business.
The Traffic Engineering Staff field-investigated the existing parking condition on Moreno Road
and found that there is no restriction of any parking except at the existing fire hydrant in front
of Denny's Restaurant. Staff observed vehicles parking very near the fire hydrant on several
occasions. Therefore, Staff recommends to paint red curb at the fire hydrant location.
-1- PwO2\agdrpt~92\0908\kentuck.pkg 0902
There have been no reported accidents in the subject area in the year 1991 nor in the year
1992 to date. '
There exists a sight distance problem for each driveway near the Kentucky Fried Chicken
property. Staff recommends the painting of red curb between the driveways at the Kentucky
Fried Chicken, Denny's Restaurant, Mexico Chiquito and at the Best Western Hotel to improve
the sight distance for people driving vehicles out of the existing driveways.
At the July 22, 1992 Traffic and Transportation Commission Meeting the Commission
recommended that the City Council restrict parking per attached Exhibit "A" on Moreno Road
to alleviate the sight distance problems in the subject area.
FISCAL IMPACT:
FY92-93 Impact: Paint 200 ft. of red curb ~ $1.00/ft. = $200. The funds are available in
Account No. 164-5410.
Attachments:
Exhibit "A"
Resolution
-2- PwO2%agdrpt~92%O908%kentuck.pkg 0902
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING "NO PARKING" ZONES
ON MORENO ROAD
The City Council of the City of Temecula does resolve, determine and order as follows:
Section 1. Pursuant to Section 12.08.223 of the Municipal Code, the following "No
Parking" zones are hereby established in the City of Temecula:
No parking on the north side of Moreno Road from a point 330 ft. east
of the east curb line of Front Street to 165 ft. east.
No parking on the north side of Moreno Road from a point 430 ft. east
of the east curb line of Front Street to 117 ft. east.
No parking on the south side of Moreno Road from a point 387 ~. east
of ~e east curb line of Front Street to 126 ft. east.
Section 2. "The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula
at a regular meeting held on the 8th of September, 1992.
ATYEST:
Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor
June S. Greek
City Clerk
[SEAL]
-I- p:~l/~ml~Imb. p6/
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA)
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that
Resolution No. __-__ was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 8th day of September, 1992, by the following
vote:
AYES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
ITEM NO. 9
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
September 8, 1992
Proposed "STOP" Signs
PREPARED BY:
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 92-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
TEMECULA ESTABLISHING "STOP" SIGNS
BACKGROUND:
Ben Dobbins, Traffic Engineer Consultant
OF THE CITY OF
Staff has received several requests for "STOP" signs in the Winchester Creek and Winchester
Collection developments, and for the commercial area bounded by Winchester Road on the
north, Jefferson Avenue on the east, Via Montezuma on the south, and Murrieta Creek on the
west.
Staff field investigated both areas and found inadequate control at 20 locations. Due to
inadequate vehicle control and/or limited sight distance, Staff recommends the installation of
"STOP" signs at the intersections listed on Exhibit "A" attached.
At the July 22, 1992 Traffic and Transportation Commission Meeting the Commission
recommended that the City Council approve the 20 "Stop" sign locations per Exhibit "A".
FISCAL IMPACT:
FY92-93: Install twenty "STOP" signs with stop bar and stop legend (20 signs ~ $110.00
ea. = $2,200). Funds are available in Public Works Sign Account No. 164-5244.
Attachments:
Exhibit "A"
Resolution
-1 - pwO2~,egdrpt%92%O908~stop.sgn 0902
EXHIBIT "A"
The following are proposed "Stop" sign locations:
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
Westbound Rising Hill Drive @ Winchester Creek Ave.
Eastbound Springtime Dr. @ Winchester Creek Ave.
Westbound Springtime Dr. @ Rainbow Creek Dr.
Northbound Quail Creek Court @ Springtime Dr.
Westbound Oak Cliff Dr. @ Rainbow Creek Dr.
Eastbound Oak Cliff Dr. @ Rainbow Creek Dr.
Northbound Quail Slope Dr. @ Oak Cliff Dr.
Southbound Quail Slope Dr. ~ Rustic Glen Dr.
Westbound Rainbow Creek Dr. @ Rustic Glen Dr.
Westbound Oak Cliff Dr. @ Rustic Glen Dr.
Westbound Rustic Glen Dr. @ Margarita Rd.
Northbound Stonegate Dr. @ Rustic Glen Dr.
Southbound Stonegate Dr. @ Creative Dr.
Eastbound Knollridge Dr. @ Rustic Glen Dr.
Southbound Creative Dr. @ Knollridge Dr.
Westbound Knollridge Dr. @ Majello Ct.
Eastbound Enterprise Circle West @ Commerce Center Dr.
Westbound Overland Dr. @ Commerce Center Dr.
Westbound Rider Way ~ Enterprise Circle West
Westbound Enterprise Circle South @'Enterprise Circle West
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING "STOP'* SIGNS
The City Council of the City of Temecula does resolve, determine and order as follows:
Section 1. Pursuant to Section 12.08.301 of the Municipal Code, the following
"STOP" sign locations are hereby established in the City of Temecula:
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
G.
H.
I.
J.
K.
L.
M.
N.
O.
P.
Q.
R.
S.
T.
Westbound Rising Hill Drive @ Winchester Creek Ave.
Eastbound Springtime Dr. @ Winchester Creek Ave.
Westbound Springtime Dr. @ Rainbow Creek Dr.
Northbound Quail Creek Court @ Springtime Dr.
Westbound Oak Cliff Dr. @ Rainbow Creek Dr.
Eastbound Oak Cliff Dr. @ Rainbow Creek Dr.
Northbound Quail Slope Dr. @ Oak Cliff Dr.
Southbound Quail Slope Dr. @ Rustic Glen Dr.
Westbound Rainbow Creek Dr. @ Rustic Glen Dr.
Westbound Oak Cliff Dr. @ Rustic Glen Dr.
Westbound Rustic Glen Dr. @ Margarita Rd.
Northbound Stonegate Dr. @ Rustic Glen Dr.
Southbound Stonegate Dr. @ Creative Dr.
Eastbound Knollridge Dr. @ Rustic Glen Dr.
Southbound Creative Dr. @ Knollridge Dr.
Westbound Knollridge Dr. @ Majello Ct.
Eastbound Enterprise Circle West @ Commerce Center Dr.
Westbound Overland Dr. @ Commerce Center Dr.
Westbound Rider Way @ Enterprise Circle West
Westbound Enterprise Circle South @ Enterprise Circle West
-1-
Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution.
PASSF~D, APPROVED AND ADOPTE~D, by the City Council of the City of Temecula
at a regular meeting held on the 8th of September, 1992.
ATTEST:
Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor
June S. Greek
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA)
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that
Resolution No. -__ was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 8th day of September, 1992, by the following
vote:
AYES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
ITEM NO.
10
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
September 8, 1992
"No Parking" Zones for the Initial Bike Lane Project
PREPARED BY: Ben Dobbins, Traffic Engineer Consultant
RECOMMENDATION:
1. That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 92-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ESTABLISHING "NO PARKING" ZONES IN DESIGNATED AREAS OF THE
INITIAL BIKE LANE PROJECT.
BACKGROUND:
On May 6, 1992 the City Council approved the Initial Bikeway Project, (Project No. PW92-03),
which included painting bike lanes on appropriate streets, sandblasting and readjusting center
lane line, and installing bikeway and "No Parking" signs.
To provide a safer path for the bike riders, Staff would recommend the following no parking
zones throughout the initial bike lane project per Exhibit "A" & "B".
FISCAL IMPACT:
Estimated cost for the no parking signs that Staff is installing is $11,630.50 from Account
No. 029-190-133-44-5804 (previously approved).
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Exhibit "A"
2. Exhibit "B"
3. Resolution
pwOS\agdrpt\92%O908%nopkg.res 0831
PAUBA
~.P,- NO PAK~.Ii, L(~ 5I~,AJ6
~f~TA
/t
/
',\
~cc3r~
/
~z NP
EX H I~/T "~"
II
II
RESOLUTION NO. 92-
A KESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ESTABLISHING 'NO PARKING" ZONES IN
DESIGNATED AREAS OF THE INITIAL BIKE LANE
PROJECT
The City Council of the City of Temecula does resolve, determine and order
as follows:
Section 1. Pursuant to Section 12.08.223 of the Municipal Code the following
"no parking" zones are hereby established in the City of Temecula:
A. No parking on the east side of Moraga Road from a point 35 feet
north of the north curb line of Rancho California Road northerly to a point 35 feet south of the
south curb line of Margarita Road.
B. No parking on the west side of Moraga Road from a point 585 feet
south of the south curb line of Margaxita Road to a point 160 feet south.
C. No parking on both sides of Yukon Street from a point 35 feet
north of the north curb line of Rancho California Road northeasterly to a point 35 feet west of
the west curb line of Margarita Road.
D. No parking on the north side of Margarita Road from a point 35
feet east of the east curb line of Moraga Road easterly to a point 630 feet east of the east curb
line of Avenida Sonoma.
F. No parking on the south side of Margarita Road from a point 405
feet east of the east curb line of Moraga Road easterly to a point at the east curb line of Avenida
Sonoma.
G. No parking on the west side of Margarita Road from a point 35 feet
north of the north curb line Yukon Street northerly to a point 875 feet north.
H. No parking on east side of Margarita Road from a point 35 feet
north of the south curb line of Yukon Street northerly to a point 35 feet south of the south curb
line of La Serena Way.
I. No parking on the south side of Rancho Vista Road from a point
35 feet east of the east curb line of Ynez Road easterly to a point 415 feet east of the east curb
line of Loma Portola Drive.
J. No parking on the north side of Rancho Vista Road from a point
35 feet east of the east curb line of Ynez Road to a point 1075 feet east.
-I- ~'~ '~f~/k' . k.sm eSOl~2
L. No parking on the south side of Rancho Vista Road from a point
470 feet west of the west curb line of Mira Loma Drive (East) easterly to a point 300 feet east
of the east curb line of Southern Cross Road.
M. No parking on the north side of Rancho Vista Road from a point
595 feet west of the west curb line of Mira Loma Drive (East) easterly to a point 300 feet east
of the east curb line of Southern Cross Road.
N. No parking on the west side of Ynez Road at a point on the north
curb line of Rancho Vista Road southeasterly to a point 35 feet west of the west curb line of
East Vallejo Avenue.
O. No parking on the east side of Ynez Road from a point 135 feet
north of the north curb line of Pauba Road southerly to a point 35 feet north of the north curb
line of Calle Haleon.
P. No parking on the east side of Ynez Road from a point 465 feet
north of the north curb line of Santiago Road southeasterly to a point at the west curb line of
East Vallejo Road.
Q. No parking on the east side of Ynez Road from a point 410 feet
south of the south curb line of Rancho Vista Road to a point 175 south.
R. No parking on the south side of De Portola Road from a point 35
feet east of the east curb line of East Vallejo Avenue westerly to a point 1090 feet west of the
west curb line of Verde Drive.
S. No parking on the south side of De Portola Road from a point 35
feet west of the west curb line of Margarita Road to a point 310 feet west.
T. No parking on the north side of De Portola Road from a point 35
feet east of the east curb line of East Vallejo Avenue easterly to a point 35 feet west of the west
curb line of Margarita Road.
U. No parking on east side of Margarita Road from a point 35 feet
north of the north curb line of De Portola Road to a point 400 feet north.
V. No parking on east side of Margarita Road from a point 35 feet
north of the north curb line of Pio Pico Road northerly to a point 35 feet south of south curb
line of Pauba Road.
W. No parking on the west side of Margarita Road from a point 35 feet
north of the north curb line of De Portola Road northerly to a point 35 feet south of the south
curb line of Pauba Road.
X. No parking on the north side of Rancho California Road from a
point 35 feet east of the east curb line of Moraga Road easterly to a point 35 feet west of the
west curb line of Margarita Road.
Y. No parking on the south side of Rancho California Road from a
point at the west curb line of Moraga Road easterly to a point 35 feet at the west curb line of
Margarita Road.
Z. No parking on the west side of Margarita Road from a point 250
feet north of the north curb line of Rancho Vista Road to a point 185 feet north.
A1. No parking on the south side of Rancho Vista Road from a point
35 feet west of the west curb line of Margarita Road to a point 655 feet west.
A2. No parking on south side of Santiago Road from a point 45 feet east
of the east curb line of Front Street easterly to the point at east curb line of uC" Street.
A3. No parking on the north side of Santiago Road from a point 35 the
east curb line of Front Street easterly to a point at the east side of the 1-15 Freeway Bridge
decking.
Section
Resolution.
The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula
at a regular meeting held on the 8th of September, 1992.
ATTEST:
Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor
June S. Greek
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
CITY OF TEMECULA
SS
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that
Resolution No. 92- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 8th day of September, 1992, by the following
vote:
AYES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
ITEM
NO.
11
APPROVAL ,~ ~.
CITY ATTORNEY L~'/-~(''
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Tim D. S.,~lF',~.~irector of Public Works/City Engineer
September' 8, 1992
Contract Change Order on Project PW91-03, Rancho California Road
Benefit District
PREPARED BY:
RECOMMENDATION:
L. Hodson, Senior Public Works Inspector
That the City Council APPROVE Contract Change Order No. 010 consisting of:
A. DECREASE IN CONTRACT QUANTITIES AT CONTRACT UNIT PRICES:
1. Decrease
2. Decrease
3. Decrease
4. Decrease
5. Decrease
6. Decrease
7. Decrease
8. Decrease
1 tree @ $220.00/EA -- $220.00
11 LF of fence @ $6.50/LF = $71.50
1,696 LF of saw cut @ $0.52/LF = $881.92
56 LF of A-8 curb @ $6.00/LF = $336.00
511 LF of brow ditch @ $14.00/LF = $7,154.00
13 LF of down drain @ $12.00/LF = $156.00
11 LF of "D" curb @ $5.00/LF = $55.00
2 EA fire hydrant @ $2,900/EA = $5,800.00
CCO-010-A1, Item SI3, 1
CCO-010-A2, Item SI4, 1
CCO-010-A3, Item SI6, 1
CCO-010-A4, Item SI12,
CCO-010-A5, Item SI21,
CCO-010-A6, Item SI22,
tree @ $220.00/EA = ..................... $220.00
1 LF of fence @ $$6.50/LF = .................. $71.50
,696 LF of saw cut @ $0.52/LF = ............. $881.92
56 LF of A-8 curb @ $6.00/LF = .............. $336.00
511 LF of brow ditch @ $14.00/LF = ......... $7,154.00
13 LF of down drain @ $12.00/LF = ............ $156.00
CCO-010-A7, Item SIA7, 11 LF of "D" curb @ $5.00/LF = ............... $55.00
CCO-010-AB, Item SIAl 2, 2 EA fire hydrant @ $2,900/EA = ........... $5,800.00
ESTIMATE OF DECREASE AT CONTRACT UNIT PRICES: ............. $14,476.42
-1- pwO5\egdrpt%92%O825\pw91-03.cco 0827a
B. INCREASE IN CONTRACT QUANTITIES AT CONTRACT UNIT PRICES:
1. Increase 1,390 SF pavement removal ~ $0.10/SF -- $139.00
2. Increase 5.75 SF driveway approach ~ $1.85/SF = $10.64
3. Increase 1,228.80 SF sidewalk @ $1.35/SF = $1,658.88
CCO-010-B1, Item SI7, 1,390 SF pavement removal ~ $0.10/SF= ........ $139.00
CCO-010-B2, Item SI13, 5.75 SF driveway approach ~ $1.85/SF = ........ $10.64
CCO-010-B3, Item SIA9, 1,228.80 SF sidewalk @ $1.35/SF = .......... $1,658.88
ESTIMATE OF INCREASE AT CONTRACT UNIT PRICES: ............... $1,808.52
C. INCREASE IN CONTRACT QUANTITIES AT AGREED PRICES:
1. Increase 3 EA through curb drains L~ $1,600lEA = $4,800.00
CCO-010-C1, Item 3 EA through curb drains ~ $1,600/EA ............. $4,800.00
ESTIMATE OF INCREASE AT AGREED PRICES: ...................... $4,800.00
BACKGROUND:
The contract for street improvements under construction on Rancho California Road between
Lyndie Lane and Margarita Road (Project No. PW91-03) was awarded to Oliver Bros. on
March 10, 1992 for the sum of $499,716.85, plus a 10% contingency, for a total of
$549,688.54. These improvements are part of the Margarita Village Specific Plan Agreement
with the City and as such, are all being reimbursed through additional building permit fees up
to a $2,000,000 cap. Also, included in that Agreement are the improvements being
constructed on the 1-15/Rancho California Road overpass. Taking into account all funds
encumbered to date for both projects and the reimbursement to the developers for costs
associated with engineering, $339,351.40 remains on balance prior to the $2,000,000 cap
being reached.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The total of increases is outweighed by the number of decreases thereby having no effect on
funds already encumbered for this project but will reduce the total contract amount by
$7,867.90
-2- pwO5%sgdrpt\92%O825\pw91-03.cco 0827e
CITY
OF TEMECULA
CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 010
CONTRACT NO. PW91-03
PROJECT: RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD BENEFIT DISTRICT
SHEET I of I_L
TO:
OLIVER BROTHERS
NOTE:
This chanQe order is not effective until aDDroved by City Council.
CHANGE REQUESTED BY: Project Inspector
A. DECREASE IN CONTRACT QUANTITIES AT CONTRACT UNIT PRICES:
1. Decrease
2. Decrease
3. Decrease
4. Decrease
5. Decrease
6. Decrease
7. Decrease
8. Decrease
1 tree @ $220.00/EA = $220.00
11 LF of fence @ $6.50/LF = $71..50
1,696 LF of saw cut @ $0.52/LF -- $881.92
56 LF of A-8 curb @ $6.00/LF = $336.00
511 LF of brow ditch @ $14.00/LF -- $7,154.00
13 LF of down drain @ $12.00/LF -- $156.00
11 LF of "D" curb @ $5.00/LF -- $55.00
2 EA fire hydrant @ $2,900/EA = $5,800.00
CCO-010-A1, Item
CCO-010-A2, Item
CCO-010-A3, Item
CCO-010-A4, Item
CCO-010-A5, Item
CCO-010-A6, Item
CCO-010-A7, Item
CCO-010-AS, Item
Si3, I tree @ $220.00/EA = ..................... $220.00
SI4, 11 LF of fence @ $$6.50/LF = .................. $71.50
SI6, 1,696 LF of saw cut @ $0.52/LF = ............. $881.92
SI12, 56 LF of A-8 curb @ $6.00/LF = ............... $336.00
SI21,511 LFof brow ditch@ $14.00/LF = ......... $7,154.00
SI22, 13 LF of down drain @ $12.00/LF -- ............ $156.00
SIA7, 11 LF of "D" curb @ $5.00/LF = ............... $55.00
SIAl 2, 2 EA fire hydrant @ $2,900/EA = ........... $5,800.00
ESTIMATE OF DECREASE AT CONTRACT UNIT PRICES: ............. $14,476.42
B. INCREASE IN CONTRACT QUANTITIES AT CONTRACT UNIT PRICES:
Increase 1,390 SF pavement removal @ S0.10/SF = $139.00
Increase 5.75 SF driveway approach @ $1.85/SF = $10.64
Increase 1,228.80 SF sidewalk @ $1.35/SF = $1,658.88
CCO-010-B1, Item SI7, 1,390 SF pavement removal @ $0.10/SF= ........ $139.00
CCO-010-B2, Item SI13, 5.75 SF driveway approach @ $1.85/SF = ........ $10.64
CCO-010-B3, Item SIA9, 1,228.80 SF sidewalk @ $1.35/SF -- .......... $1,658.88
ESTIMATE OF INCREASE AT CONTRACT UNIT PRICES: ............... $1,808.52
45174 BUSlNr, S5 PAI~K DI~IvI~ · TEMECULA. CALIFOI~NIA 9c)590 · PHONE (714) 694-1989 · F.~X (714) 694-1999
pWO2\pW91-03%CCO\010 0813 8:15 am
Contract Change Order No, 010
PW91-03 R.C. RD. BENEFIT DISTRICT
Sheet 2 of 2__
INCREASE IN CONTRACT QUANTITIES AT AGREED PRICES:
1. Increase 3 EA thru curb drains @ $1,600/EA = $4,800.00
CCO-010-C1, Item 3 EA thru curb drains @ $1,600/EA ................ $4,800.00
ESTIMATE OF INCREASE AT AGREED PRICES: ...................... $4,800.00
By reason of this Order, the time of completion will be adjusted as follows:
Approved: Deputy City Engr. B , Date:
NONE
We the undersigned contractor have given careful consideration to the change proposed and
hereby agree. If this proposal is approved, that we will provide all equipment, furnish all
materials, except as may otherwise be noted above, and perform all services necessary for
the work above specified, and will accept as full payment therefore the prices shown above.
By: : Title: /~z~=~,denu-r-
If the contractor does not sign acceptance of this order, his attention is directed to the
requirements of the specifications as to proceeding with the ordered work and filing a written
protest within the time therein specified.
pw02%pw91-03\cco\010 0813 8:15 am
ITEM NO.
12
APPROVAL __~ .
CITY ATTORNEY ~ ~ ~' ~'~
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
City Council/City Manager
FROM:
Scott Field, City Attorney
DATE:
September 8, 1992
SUBJECT: Rancho California Water District - Refund of Fire Mitigation Fee
PREPARED BY:
Scott Field City Attorney
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council authorize the refund to the Rancho California
Water District of a Fire Mitigation Fee in the amount of $17,167.50 paid for the Rancho
California Water District headquarters.
DISCUSSION: Prior to the City incorporation, the County adopted a policy directing that all
commercial projects be conditioned to pay a Fire Mitigation Fee of $ .25 per square foot to
offset the cost of building fire station. This fee was applied to the plot plan for the Rancho
California Water District Administration building. At the time of obtaining its building permit,
the District paid the fee in the amount of $17,167.50 under protest. The District claimed that
it was exempt from the fee.
In the recent Supreme Court case of San Marcos Water District v. San Marcos Unified School
District (1986) 42 Cal. 3rd 154, the California Supreme Court held that public agencies are
generally not required to pay development fees imposed by other public agencies. On the
other hand, public agencies are required to pay user fees imposed by other public agencies.
This distinction is also reflected in the Fire Protection District Law of 1961, which provides
that fire protection districts may charge user fees on other public agencies, but may not
charge a fee for new construction.
The California Legislature partially reversed the San Marcos decision in 1988 when it adopted
special rules concerning liability of public entities for public utility capital facilities fees. This
Legislation provided that public agencies, including cities, school districts and water districts,
must pay any capital facility fee for "public utility facilities." The term "Public utility facility"
means" a facility for the provision of water, light, heat, communications, power, or garbage
service, or flood control, drainage for sanitary purposes, or for sewage collection, treatment
or disposal." This term does not include fire protection facilities.
CONCLUSION: State law prevents the City from imposing a capital facilities fee on other
public agencies for fire protection purposes. Consequently, it is recommended that these fees
paid to the City be refunded.
(It should also be noted that the City has an ongoing dispute with the Water District as to City
expenses incurred when a waterline was relocated to allow the installation of a 24" storm
drain to relieve a sump on Rancho California Road. This work was done during the widening
of Rancho California Road. City staff and District staff are currently in negotiations as to
whether the District should be required to pay for the cost of relocating this waterline. City
staff is in agreement with the District that the fire fee and relocation expense issues may be
separated.)
FINANCIAL IMPACT: Refund of $17,167.50 from Account No. 120-199-4230
ITEM NO.
13
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER /~,_,
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
City Manager/City Council
FROM:
City Attorney
DATE:
September 8, 1992
SUBJECT:
Approval of Redevelopment Funding for Storm Drain Improvements on Front
St./I-15 with PM 22515 and CUP No. 5.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council:
Make a finding that the construction of Storm Drain Improvements on Front
St./I-15 with PM 22515 and CUP No. 5 will benefit the redevelopment project
area, and the immediate neighborhood in which the Storm Drain Improvements
are located; and that there are no other reasonable means of financing these
Storm Drain Improvements.
DISCUSSION: On August 25, 1992, the City Council authorized Redevelopment Agency
funding for $34,000.00 of the $239,000.00 cost of the Storm Drain Improv. ements located
at Front Street and 1-15· A copy of the staff report is attached. In order to fund this
improvement it is also necessary that not only the Redevelopment Agency approve it but that
the City Council make certain findings as well· Specifically, in order for the Redevelopment
Agency to fund the construction of the Storm Drain Improvements, it is necessary that the
City Council find that the Improvement will benefit the Project Area and that no other funding
mechanism is reasonably available.
A map of the Project Area is attached. Front Street is within the project area and installation
of the Storm Drain Improvements will improve traffic circulation during the rainy season.
No other reasonable means are available to finance the Front Street/I-15 Storm Drain
Improvements because Development Impact Fees are otherwise committed in the Capital
Improvement Program and immediate developer installation is unavailable.
o,/
, /
TEMECULA
Subarea Map
In an effort to provide more clarit
rela~ed to existing !and uses on eae~
arcel, the lar e Project area has
~een subdivide~ into four separate
subareas. This map shows each of the
subareas and their relationshi is to
auonsnlt
one another for ease in evaluating the
followinK 'Existing Land Use Maps'.
4
-4
I
..-'* · !
..
.,-
·
%,
CITY MANAGER
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Board, Redevelopment Agency
Department of Public Works
August 25, 1992
Construction Cost Participation for Storm
Front St.ll-15 with PM22515 and CUP No. 5
Drain Improvements on
PREPARED BY:
Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Board approve participation in the construction of a major storm drain under Front
Street in conjunction with the developers of PM22515 and CUP No. 5 in an amount not to
exceed $34,000, direct General Counsel to prepare the necessary agreement on behalf of the
Redevelopment Agency, and authorize the Chairperson to sign the agreement.
BACKGROUND:
The developer of Parcel Map No. 22515, Mr. Keith L. McCann, Jr., along with the developer
of Conditional Use Permit No. 5, Mr. Lou Kashmere, is requesting that the City participate
with them in the cost of constructing a storm drain under Front Street. The two development
projects are located on the east side (McCann, PM22515) and the west side (Kashmere,
CUP No. 5) of the south end of Front Street. The storm system was designed and is currently
being constructed as a condition of development on both projects. The storm drain picks up
storm water that has been conveyed from the Vallejo Channel under I-15 through two 8'x5'
reinforced concrete box culverts and transmits it to Murrieta Creek.
The developers of the projects desire to install all of the required improvements, including the
street improvements, as soon as possible. The elevations associated with the storm drain and
street grades have required the two developers to work together to install the entire street
improvements as a unit. The constraint placed on the design and construction of the storm
drain and street improvements by the existing topography has caused the cost of installing
those improvements to escalate to a point where the developers cannot afford to complete
the project without financial assistance from the City. Parcel Map No. 22515 has not
-1- pwO1~agdrpt~.92%O825~pm22515c.up5 0817
recorded end will expire on November 3, 1992. However, the developer has posted
construction bonds for his share of the storm drain.
The City expended el 2,000 during the last rainy season to clear mud and debris from this
portion of Front Street. Additionally, representatives of Del Rio Plaza informed the Public
Works Dept. that approximately $5,000 had been spent to clear their parking lot of mud. The
participation cost of $34,000 represents two years of maintenance costs. Construction of
the storm drain will eliminate the majority of the problem. If the City were to construct
minimal storm drain improvements to convey the existing flows under Front Street with an
open channel on each side, the construction and design cost would exceed $50,000. The
portion of the costs associated with Del Rio Plaza will be discussed with the owner of Del Rio
Plaza in anticipation of negotiating a solution that will eliminate the cross-gutter in front of the
Plaza and allow a storm drain to be constructed through the Plaza parking lot to Murrieta
Creek.
The $34,000 cost represents 14% of the required bonding amount of $239,000 for the
construction of the storm drain. Participation by the City will enable the project to proceed
and eliminate the constant maintenance costs associated with this section of Front Street.
Copies of letters from Mr. Larry Markham and Mr. Keith McCann are attached for your review.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The $34,000 cost will be charged to RDA Acquisition (160-199-801-5808).
ATTACHMENT:
Letters from Mr. Larry Markham and Mr. Keith McCann
-2- PwO1%egdrPt%92%O825~prn22515c.up5 0817
ITEM NO.
14
APPROV
CITY ATTORNEY
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning
September 8, 1992
Change of Zone No. 5631 and Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 25320
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council continue Change of Zone
No. 5631 and Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 25320 to
September 22, 1992.
ANALYSIS
Change of Zone No. 5631 and Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 25320 were previously before
the City Council on October 8, 1991, November 12, 1991, December 10, 1991, January 14,
1992, March 10, 1992, April 14, 1992, June 9, 1992, August 11, 1992 and September 8,
1992. These items were continued at the applicants' request. The item is once again being
continued to September 22, 1992.
vgw
S~STAFFRP~5631CZ.C10 1
ITEM NO.
15
FINANCE OFFICE~~
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Council
FROM: City Manager
DATE:
September 8, 1992
SUBJECT: Public Safety/Traffic and Transportation Commissions
PREPARED BY: H. Rick Sayre, Police Chief
RECOMMENDATION: Review the options presented end direct staff to proceed with the
necessary Code amendments to reflect the Council's desired course of action.
BACKGROUND: At the August 11, 1992 meeting, the City Council held discussions
regarding the merger of the Public Safety and Traffic and Transportation Commissions. After
a brief discussion Council requested that staff prepare a list of options for further discussion.
The following are those options.
OOtiOn A.
Remain status cluo leaving both Commissions in place.
Pros:
Commissions exist for specific Public Safety issues.
Permits a sounding board for citizens to express concerns.
CoRs:
Insufficient work load.
Cost to the City to support Commission in terms of staff time.
Issues overlap between the two Commissions and duplication of efforts
results.
OOtiOn B.
Merge the Commissions into one, forming a Public/Traffic Safety
Commission.
Pros:
Ample work load for Commission.
Reduces work load for staff.
Single Commission for citizens to speak to regarding all safety related
issues.
Topics overlap in content.
Page two
Public/Traffic Safety Commission Merger
Coni:
May require two meetings per month.
Traffic Safety topics require specific understanding of traffic engineering
issues.
ODtiOn C.
Establish a seven (7) member Public/Traffic Safety Commission. The
pros and cons listed for option B will hold true for Option C and will also
include the following:
Pros:
Council will have the opportunity to appoint another commissioner.
Increased membership will increase representation of the community.
Cons:
May become unwieldy, too many commissioners.
If Option A were selected, the Council should appoint two Traffic and Transportation and two
Public Safety Commissioners in October to fill the terms due to expire at that time.
If Option B were selected, the new Commission would be made up of six members. Three
from each existing commission, positions that do not expire this year. The Chair would not
have voting rights unless a commissioner was absent, to avoid ties that can result from a
Commission having an even number of members.
If Option C were selected, Council would have the opportunity to reappoint Commissioners
whose terms are expiring or could seek a new candidate. If the Commission were to become
unwieldy due to the increase in size its membership could be reduced during the upcoming
year through attrition.
The City Council also requested information on the matters which were considered by the two
Commissions. Attached is a list of subjects and actions taken by both Commission since
August, 1991.
The following Commissioner's terms will expire October, 1992.
Public Safety Commission:
Ted Goudy
Frank Klein
Traffic and Transportation Commission:
Jerry Godnick
Ronald Roberts
FISCAL IMPACT: A reduction in costs could be realized if the Commissions were
consolidated and meetings held once a month. If consolidated and two meetings per month
were required, virtually no savings would be realized.
ATTACHMENTS:
Review of Agendas and Actions - Public Safety Commission
Summary of Regular Meetings - Traffic and Transportation Commission
PUBLIC SAFETY COMMISSION
AGENDAS AND ACTION REVIEW
AUGUST 28, 1992
August 1991 Meeting
hergencV Preparedness
- Discussion only
Noise Ordinance
- Discussion only
Air Oualitv Ordinance'
- Discussion only
September 1991 Meeting
T.I.P. Program
- Presentation by T.I.P. (Trauma Intervention Program)
representatives.
Emergency Preparedness
- Recommendation - Discussion only
Wooden Roof Ordinance
- Recommendation - Approve wooden roof ordinance for
recommendation to the City Council, prepared by Tony Elmo,
Chief Building Inspector.
Goals and Objectives
- Adopt Resolution No. 91-(next) The Goals and Objectives of
the Public Safety Commission of the City of Temecula and
recommend approval by the City Council of the City of
Temecula.
October 1991 Meeting
Emergency Preparedness
- Discussion only
November 1991 Meeting
her~ency Preparedness
- Discussion only
December 1991 Meeting
XDprcved Minute Procedure
Public Safety Complaints
- Discussion only
Avenida De La Reina Safety Concerns
- Discussion only
Trauma Intervention Program {TIP)
- Presentation by T.I.P Representative
- Consider recommendations to Council
NeiQhborhood Watch (N.W.) Activities
- Presentation and discussion
Status of Neighborhood Watch {N.W.) Communications
- Receive and file report
Emergency Preparedness
- Receive and file report
School Safety
- Receive and file report
Unfinished Business
- Discussion only
January 1992 Meeting
Public Safety Complaints and Recommendations
- Discussion only
Red Cross Disaster Services
- Receive and file report
Cal I.D.
- Receive and file report
Avertida De La Reina Safety Concerns
- Discussion only
Public Works and Safety
- Receive and file report
Neighborhood Watch gN.W.) Activities
- Receive and file report
Status of N.W. Communications
- Receive and file report
Emergency Preparedness
- Citizens Report
- Receive and file report
Unfinished Business
- Discussion only
General Plan Technical Subcommittee ApDt.
- Appointment Commissioner to General Plan Technical
Subcommittee
February 1992 MeetinQ
Public Safety Complaints/Recommendations
- Discussion only
General Plan Technical Subcommittee ApPointment
- Subject review
- Appointment of a Public Safety Commissioner to the Growth
Management Technical Subcommittee for the City's General
Plan.
- Recommendations for PSC Appointee
-3-
Coalinca Earthquake
- Receive and file report
Code Enforcement Activities
- Receive and file report
Formation of Substance Abuse Sub-Committee
- Nominate two Commissioners
Neighborhood Watch {NW) Activities
- Receive and file report
Status of N.W. Communications
- Receive and file report
Emeraencv Preparedness
- Receive and file report
Unfinished Business
- Action and discussion items
Move to French Valle7 Station
- Discussion only
March 1992 Meeting
Public Safety Complaints/Recommendations
- Discussion only
AAA Safety Program
- Receive and file report
Safe Routes to School
- Receive and file report
Neighborhood Watch {NW) Activities
- Receive and file reports
Business Watch {BW) Activities
- Receive and file report
Emeraency Preparedness
- Receive and file report
Unfinished Business
- Action and discussion items
ADril 1992 Meeting
Public Safety Complaints/Recommendations
- Discussion only
TraUma Intervention Program (Tip)
- Receive and file report
Neiahborhood Watch (NW) Activities
- Receive and file reports
Business Watch {BW) Activities
- Receive and file report
Crime Prevention Activities
- Receive and file report
Emergency Preparedness
- Receive and file report
Unfinished Business
- Action and discussion items
· Forwarded Commissioner Xnopp's memorandumto the Traffic
and Transportation Commission and Public Works
Department, regarding traffic hazard to the intersection
of Solana and Ynez.
· Awaiting an appointment date to meet with a geologist to
investigate Mr. James Marple's concerns for a potential
landslide at the Santa Margarita gorge, downstream from
Temecula.
-5-
Questioned Chief Sayre on his support of the inclusion of
the membership of the Public Safety Commission~s drug
abuse sub-committee in the TVUSD program to reduce drug
and alcohol use in the City.
Awaiting the go signal for budget review.
Selected Saturday, June 6, 2992 for orientation trip of
the following locatlons:
Fire Services
Law Enforcement Services (French Valley Headquarters)
Ca1 I.D.
Perris Dispatch
May 1992 Meetinc
Animal Control Services
- Receive and file report
Report on L.A. Incident
- Receive and file report
Neighborhood Watch {NW) Activities
- Receive and file report
Business Watch {BW) Activities
- Receive and file report
Emergency Preparedness
- Receive and file report
Review of PSC Goals and Objectives
- Discussion and possible action
Unfinished Business
- Action and discussion items
June 1992 Meeting
Building and Safety
- Receive and file report
City Emergency Management
- Receive and file report
Emergency Preparedness
- Receive and file report
Neiqhborhood Watch {NW) Activities
- Receive and file report
Unfinished Business
- Discussion only
-7-
TEMECULA TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
SUMMARY OF REGULAR MEETINGS
AUGUST 1991-1992
AUGUST 1991
Wabash Lane - State Route 79 (South)
None. California Sunset Homeowners'
Commission.
Association request to speak to the
SEPTEMBER 1991
Planning Department
None. General Plan Status Report.
Investigation/Maintenance Report
None. Receive and File.
OCTOBER 1991
Election of Chairman and Vice-Chairman
Proceed with election.
Traffic Circulation General Plan
Presentation by Bob Davis of Wilbur Smith Assoc. on the General .Plan circulation
conditions.
Calle Medusa
To submit two (2) alternative bypass routes (Margarita & Butterfield) to City Council.
NOVEMBER 1991
Solid Waste and Street Sweeping
Presentation by Joe Hreha, Senior Manageme,'~t Analyst, City of Temecula, on the
City's solid waste and street sweeping program.
Riverside Transit Agency
Presentation by a PTA representative giving update on PTA's Route 23.
Disaster Preparedness
Presentation by a representative of the Fire Department on disaster preparedness.
-1- PwOS~traf~c\commissn%agenda~summary.agd 082192
Investigation/Maintenance Report
Receive and File.
DECEMBER 1991
Investigation/Maintenance Report
Receive and File.
Multi-Way Stop Sign at Margarita Road and Avenida Barca
Staff recommends not to install a Multi-Way Stop Sign at Margarita Road and Avenida
Barca.
JANUARY 1992
Marie Callender's Entrance on Rancho California Rd. Just East of Ynez Road
Staff recommends installing a right turn lane for the westbound traffic; installing a "NO
U-TURN" sign at the easterly side of the intersection; and relocating the "STOP"
legend and "STOP-BAR" for southbound traffic.
General Plan Technical Subcommittee Appointments
Commission appoint a representative to the General Plan Technical Subcommittee.
American Automobile Association
Cathy Zaitz, District Manager of American Automobile Association, will hand out traffic
safety brochures.
"Speed Checked By Radar" Signs
Staff recommends that the Traffic & Transportation Commission recommend to the
City Council the installation of "Speed Checked By Radar" signs.
Investigation/Maintenance Report
Receive and File.
FEBRUARY 1992
Regulations on Towing Services
Councilmember Sal Mu~oz will give a presentation on regulations on towing services.
Traffic Circulation Update
Presentation by Bob Davis of Wilbur Smith Assoc. on the Traffic Circulation General
Plan updated.
Investigation/Maintenance Report
Receive and File.
-2- PwOS~traffic\cornmissn\agende~summ. ary.agd 082192
MARCH 1992
Traffic Signal at Margarita Road and La Serena Way
That the Traffic and Transportation Commission recommend to the City Council to
direct staff to install a traffic signal at the intersection of Margarita Road and La Serena
Way.
Traffic Stop for Paseo Goleta Area
Install "STOP" signs for Calle Tajo and Corte Sonora at Paseo de las Olas and Paseo
Goleta respectively.
Investigation/Maintenance Report
Receive and File.
APRIL 1992
Citywide Speed Survey
Discussion.
Alternate Transportation Modes
Discussion.
Investigation/Maintenance Report
Receive and File.
MAY 1992
Permanent Routes for Oversize Vehicles
Appointment of committee members to develop procedures for oversize vehicle
routes.
Investigation/Maintenance Report
Receive and File.
JUNE 1992
Riverside Transit Agency (RTA)
Steve Connell, Assistant General Manager of the Riverside Transit Agency, will be
providing the Commission an update on the Agency's services.
Temecula Shuttle
Ed Dool, Vice President of the Temecula Shuttle, will be giving a presentation on the
shuttle service his company provides.
-3- pwOS~traffic~commissn~agenda\summery.egd 082192
Traffic Accident Diagram on Jefferson Avenue/Front Street
Staff will present an accident diagram of Jefferson Avenue/Front Street from
Winchester Road to Rancho California Road.
Investigation/Maintenance Report
Receive and File.
JULY
1992
Calle Pifia Colada
That the Traffic and Transportation Commission recommend for approval to City
Council that the speed limit on Calle Pir~a Colada be reduced to 25 mph.
Jefferson Avenue NIO Winchester Road - Street Parking
It is recommended that "No Parking" signs be installed on both sides of Jefferson
Avenue from Winchester Road to Santa Gertrudis Creek Bridge, except for a 160' long
2-hour parking restriction on the west side of Jefferson Avenue and install "No
Parking" signs on the east side of Jefferson Avenue from the Bridge to Sanborn
Avenue (see Exhibit "A"). Also, that Staff will look at the remaining areas north of this
area for prohibiting parking when development permits. Proceed with this
recommendation to the City Council for approval by a resolution.
Kentucky Fried Chicken - Parking
It is recommended that red curb be painted on the north and south side of Moreno
Road east of From Street per Exhibit "A". Proceed with this recommendation to the
City Council for approval by a resolution.
Winchester Road and Overpass
Discuss alternatives to help traffic flow on Winchester Road from Jefferson Avenue
to Ynez Road.
Typical Striping for Knuckle Type of Street
That Traffic and Transportation approve a typical double stripe for knuckle type of
streets in the City of Temecula.
Centedine Striping Policy
That Traffic and Transportation Commission approve the centerline striping policy.
Investigation/Maintenance Report
Receive and File.
-4- pwOS\traffic%commiesn\agenda\summary.egd 082192
AUGUST 1992
Comprehensive Transportation Plan and the Congestion Management Plan
Presentation by Mr. David Gunderman, Deputy Director of Western Riverside Council
of Governments, on the Comprehensive Transportation Plan and the Congestion
Management Plan.
Winchester Road and Overpass
Discuss alternatives to help traffic flow on Winchester Road from Jefferson Avenue
to Ynez Road.
Speed Limit on Pauba Road
That the Traffic and Transportation Commission recommend to City Council that the
posted speed limit on Pauba Road, from Ynez Road to Meadows Parkway, be reduced
from 50 m.p.h. to 45 m.p.h..
Twenty "Stop" Sign Locations
That the Traffic and Transportation Commission recommend to City Council the
installation of twenty "Stop" signs (performed by City staff) throughout the City.
Investigation/Maintenance Report
Receive and File.
-5- PwOS\traf~c%commissn\agende~.sumrnary.agd 082192
ITEM
NO.
16
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
September 8, 1992
Reduce the Speed Limit on Pauba Road from Ynez Road to Meadows
Parkway from 50 mph to 45 mph
PREPARED BY: Ben Dobbins, Traffic Engineer Consultant
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 92-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA,
AMENDING SECTION 12.02,010 (d) OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE
REDUCING PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS ON PAUBA ROAD BETWEEN YNEZ
ROAD AND MEADOWS PARKWAY.
BACKGROUND:
The Traffic and Transportation Commission requested that staff conduct a speed zone study
on Pauba Road.
Staff field investigated Pauba Road, from Ynez Road to Meadows Parkway, and found many
horizontal and vertical curves which limit the sight distances. The roadway width, from
several hundred feet east of La Primavera Street to Margarita Road, is less than the standard
roadway width of 24 feet. The above field conditions create an unusual condition that
warrants a speed limit less than the critical speed. As shown on the attached speed radar
survey printouts, the critical speed (85 percentile) varied from 47 to 55 m.p.h. throughout the
survey limits. Therefore, staff recommends, due to the unusual field conditions, that the
posted speed limit of 50 m.p.h. be reduced to 45 m.p.h.
The Traffic and Transportation Commission recommends that the City Council amend the
ordinance to state that the speed limit on Pauba Road from Ynez Road to Meadows Parkway
be 45 m.p.h. based on staff's Traffic and Engineering Survey for Speed Zoning.
-1- pwO5\agdrpt%92~O908~oauba.spe 0831a
FISCAL IMPACT:
FY92-93 Impact:
impact is $960.
Install approximately 12 speed limit signs ($80.00 per sign). Total FY92-93
Funds are available in Public Works Sign Account No. 164-5244.
Attachments:
Ordinance
Speed Radar Survey
-2- pw05\aOdrpt~92%0908~peuba.spe 0902
ORDINANCE 92-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, AMF-NDING SECTION 12.02010 (d) OF THE TEMECULA
MUNICIPAL CODE ltFIIUCING PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS ON
PAUBA ROAD BETWEEN YNEZ ROAD AND MEADOWS PARKWAY
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN
AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1.
to read as follows:
Section 12.02.10 (d) of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended
(d) The streets, on portions of streets, within the City of Temecula limits
affected, and the declared prima facie speed limit shall be as follows:
Name of Street and
Portion Affected
De Portola Road -
Jedediah Smith to
Margarita Road
Del Rey Road -
Via None to Avenida
Del Reposo
Diaz Road -
Winchester Road to
Rancho Ca]if. Road
Front Street -
Via Montezuma to
Rancho Ca]if. Road
Front Street -
Rancho Ca]if. Rd. to
Santiago Rd.
Front Street -
Santiago Road to
Route 15
Jefferson Avenue
North City Limit to
Winchester Rd.
Declared Prima Facie
Speed Limit.
Miles Per hour
50
35
45
45
25
45
50
Name of Street and
Portion Affected
Jefferson Avenue -
Winchester Rd. to Via
Montezuma
La Paz Street -
Route 79 to Ynez Road
La Serena Way -
Margarita Road to
Calle Medusa
Margarita Road -
Solaria Way to South
City Limit
Moraga Road -
Margarita Road to
Rancho Calif. Rd.
Nicolas Road -
Winchester Rd. to
Calle Medusa
Pauba Road -
Ynez Road to Meadows
Parkway
Pauba Road -
Meadows Pkwy. to east
City limits
Rainbow Canyon Rd. -
Pala Rd. to South City
limit
Rancho Calif. Road -
West City Limit to
Diaz Rd.
Rancho Calif. Road -
Diaz Rd. to Moraga
Rd.
Rancho Calif. Road -
Moraga Rd. to
Margarita Rd.
Rancho Vista Road -
Ynez Road to East City
Limit
Declared Prima Facie
Speed Limit.
Miles Per hour
45
35
45
40
40
50
45
50
40
50
40
50
45
Name of Street and
Portion Affected
Declared Prima Facie
Speed Limit.
Miles Per hour
Santiago Road -
Front Street to Ynez
Road 45
Solaria Way -
Ynez Road to Del Rey
Road 45
Via None -
Solana Way to Avenida
Del Reposo 35
Winchester Road -
Diaz Road to
Jefferson Ave. 40
Ynez Road -
Winchester Road to
Rancho Calif. Rd. 45
Ynez Road -
Rancho Ca/if. Rd. to
Jedediah Smith Rd. 45
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 8th day of September, 1992.
ATTEST:
Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor
June S. Greek
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE)
CITY OF TEMECULA)
SS
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that
the foregoing Ordinance No. 92- was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at
regular meeting of the City Council on the 8th day of September, 1992, and that thereafter, said
Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Temecula on the 8th day of September, 1992, by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: -
COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: -
COUNCILMEMBERS:
ITEM
17
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
RE:
July 31, 1992
City Council
David Dixon, City Manager
Chairman Frank Klein
Public Safety Commission
Emergency Manager Job Status
At the Public Safety Commission meeting of July 23, 1992, a motion was made and
carried three to two as follows: "In view of the multiplicity of tasks involved and the
risks attendant to delays in achieving near-time City emergency readiness, the Public
Safety Commission recommends that the function of a City Emergency Manager be
upgraded from its current part-time designated status to a full-time City staff
position."
As maker of the motion, I feel that it is extremely important that a full-time staff
responsibility for emergency preparedness be clearly delegated to one individual.
The Public Safety Commission suggests that this matter be considered at the earliest
possible opportunity.
FK:Ic
ITEM NO. 18
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
PREPARED BY:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council
City Manager
September 8, 1992
Item No. 18 - Discussion of Commission Recognition Banquet
City Clerk June S. Greek
BACKGROUND: This item is placed on the agenda for discussion and staff
direction at the request of Mayor Birdsall.
JSG
ITEM
NO.
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council
City Manager
March 10, 1992
Item No. 19 Consideration of
Schedule Holders
Allocation for
Bus Stop and
PREPARED BY:
City Clerk June S. Greek
BACKGROUND: This matter has been placed on the agenda at the request
of Councilmember Mu~oz. Any additional back-up materials that are received prior to
the meeting will be forwarded to you under separate cover.
JSG
TEMECULA COMMUNITY
SERVICES DISTRICT
AGENDA
ITEM
1
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
HELD TUESDAY, AUGUST 11, 1992
A regular meeting of the Temecula Community Services District was called to order Tuesday,
August I 1, at 9:20 P.M., Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula,
California. President Ronald J. Parks presiding.
PRESENT: 5 DIRECTORS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Mu~oz, Parks
ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None
Also present were City Manager David Dixon, City Attorney Scott Field and City Clerk June
Greek.
PUBLIC COMMENT
None
CONSENT CALENDAR
It was moved by Director Moore, seconded by Director Birdsall to approve Consent
AYES:
NOES:
Minutes
Calendar Item No. 1.
The motion carried as follows:
5 DIRECTORS:
0 DIRECTORS:
Approve the minutes of July 14, 1992.
Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Mur'ioz, Parks
None
GENERAL MANAGERS REPORT
None
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT
Shawn Nelson reported on the following:
* The first Neighborhood Council meeting was held on August 4, at City Hall,
artended by residents from various communities in the City.
* The Community Recreation Center is in the plan check process, bids will be
CSDMIN811 1/92
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MINUTES AUGUST 11.1992
reviewed and awarded by the end of the September, and ground breaking is
planned for October.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS
Director Lindemans reported that he had observed the progress on the Senior Center with
seniors participating in the construction.
Director Mu~oz requested that staff provide an update on the TCSD.
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Director Moore, seconded by Director Birdsall to adjourn at 9:25 P.M. The
motion was carried unanimously.
The next regular meeting of the Temecula Community Services District will be held Tuesday,
August 25, 1992, 8:00 P.M., Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula,
California.
President Ronald J. Parks
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, TCSD Secretary
CSDMINBI'I '1192 -2° 912192
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
HELD TUESDAY, AUGUST 25, 1992
A regular meeting of the Temecula Community Services District was called to order Tuesday,
August 25, at 8:00 P.M., Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula,
California. President Ronald J. Parks presiding.
PRESENT: 5 DIRECTORS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Mu~oz, Parks
ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None
Also present were City Manager David Dixon, City Attorney Scott Field and Administrative
Secretary Susan Jones.
PUBLIC COMMENT
None
CONSENT CALENDAR
It was moved by Director Birdsall, seconded by Director Moore to approve Consent
Calendar Item No. 1.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 5 DIRECTORS:
NOES: 0
Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Mu~oz, Parks
DIRECTORS: None
Pool Lease with Temecula Valley Unified School District
1.1 Lease the pool and bath house facility at Temecula Elementary School through
September 30, 1994.
DISTRICT BUSINESS
2. Desion Services - Pala Road Park Project
Shawn Nelson presented the staff report.
Director Lindemans expressed his concern dismay that this contract was not awarded
to a local company.
TCSDMIN8/2rd92 - 1 - ~/2/92
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MINUTES AUGUST 25, 1992
· Director Mu~oz concurred, but added that Wimmer Yamada Associates' presentation
was superior to the other presentations.
President Parks added that although this was the primary contract, several sub-
contractors would be used and at least one was awarded to a local contractor.
It was moved by Director Moore, seconded by Director Birdsall to:
2.1
Award contract to Wimmer Yamada Associates (WYA) to provide conceptual
schematic design drawings, construction documents, and project administration
for the Pala Road Park Project which consists of developing a community park
on approximately 28.6 acres.
2.2 Request $185,400 from the Community Facilities District
appropriate $185,400 to account #250-199-120-5802.
The motion was carried as follows:
88-12 and
AYES: 4 DIRECTORS: Birdsall, Moore, Mufioz, Parks
NOES: I DIRECTORS: Lindemans
It was moved by Director Birdsall, seconded by Director Lindemans to appoint
President Parks and Director Moore to serve on the Project Committee for the Pala
Road Park Project.
The motion was unanimously carried as follows:
AYES: 5 DIRECTORS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Mu~oz, Parks
NOES: 0 DIRECTORS: None
DEPARTMENTAL REPORT
None
GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT
None
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT
Shawn Nelson reported the following:
TCSDMIN8/2EI$2 -2-
Currently advertising for bid, Phase One - Mass Grading of the Community
Recreation Center. Bid opening on September 17, 1992. Anticipate bringing
forward for Council approval on September 22, 1992.
Currently preparing the Master Plan for irrigation and installation of grass at 3.5
acre Loma Linda park site. Anticipate bring forward for Council consideration
on September 28, 1992.
Bike way project final street improvements and sign installation should be
completed by the end of this week, and stripping work beginning the first of
next week.
Parks and Recreation Masterplan first committee meeting was held August 13,
1992, with a good of input. Anticipate a follow-up meeting mid to late
September.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS
Director Mu~oz asked if the number of "No Parking" signs could be decreased along the bike
route. President Parks confirmed that staff was currently reviewing the placement of the
signs.
Director Birdsall suggested that Director Lindemans attend the bid opening for mass grading
of the CRC on September 17 to review bids submitted by local contractors and others.
Director Birdsall stated that re-appointment of Commissioners is coming up in October, and
asked that an "Appreciation Dinner" be considered by the Council, prior to expiration of terms.
Director Lindemans advised that he was contacted by Bill Johnson who advised that he would
like to plant roses on the median of the Rancho California overpass. Director Mur~oz added
that he also discussed this issue with Mr. Johnson and suggested that the roses be planted
in the bullnose section of the median. President Parks asked staff to review.
President Parks advised that at a recent meeting of URGE there were discussions of holding
a community volunteer clean-up of the Murrieta Creek. He added that they will be meeting
on August 26, 1992 at the Murrieta City Hall to discuss public participation. President Parks
asked Joe Hreha to contact Temecula Environmental
for assistance with the large items in the creek (i.e. refrigerators, vehicles, etc.).
TCSDMINBI2EIg2 -3- 9f2/92
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MINUTES AUGUST 25.1992
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Director Moore, seconded by Director Lindemans to adjourn at 8:20 P.M.
The next regular meeting September 8, 1992, 8:00 P.M., Temecula Community Center,
28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California.
President Ronald J. Parks
ATTEST:
June S. Greek
TCSDMINII2EII2 -4- ~12/~2
ITEM
2
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER ,~./~
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
FROM:
DAVID F. DIXON, CITY MANAGER
DATE:
SEPTEMBER 8,1992
SUBJECT:
PREPARED BY: ~
RECOMMENDATION:
NAMING OF TWO MINI-PARKS
Gary King, Development Services Administrator
That the Board of Directors:
1. Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 92-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ADOPTING A POLICY FOR NAMING
PARKS AND RECREATION FACILITIES
e
Approve names for two (2) mini-parks located within the Village Encore
development, south of Rancho California Road and east of Margarita Road (see
attached maps).
DISCUSSION: On April 23, 1991, the Board of Directors adopted a policy
for naming parks and recreation facilities. As part of that policy, the Parks and
Recreation Commission was given the responsibility to select potential names for park
sites and forward those names to the Board of Directors for approval. The current
policy requires the naming of park sites to be held only through a Public Hearing of the
Parks and Recreation Commission. Staff is recommending that the naming policy be
revised to allow the Parks and Recreation Commission to consider names for City park
sites under Commission business and not through a public hearing.
AGENDA REPORT
September 8, 1992
Page 2
On August 10, 1992, the Parks and Recreation Commission recommended to the
Board of Directors the following names for the two (2) mini-parks:
1. Calle Aragon Park
2. Bahia Vista Park
The Commission recommended these names because the parks coincide with their
immediate street names and pursuant to the naming policy, priority is given to
geographic locations.
The Board of Directors may approve these recommended names or consider any other
names desired.
la~tpadm~Jme~l 03,18~2
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 9~_
A RESOLITrION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
ADOPTING A POLICY FOR NAMING PARKS AND
RECREATION FACILITIES
WHEREAS, on April 23, 1991, the Board of Directors (the "Board") adopted a policy
for naming parks and recreation facilities; and
WHEREAS, the Community Services District and the Parks and Recreation Commission
requests that the aforementioned policy be adopted by resolution;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT DOES HEREBY, RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND
ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the policy for naming parks and recreation facilities as set forth on
Exhibit "A" is adopted establishing a uniform policy and procedure that identifies criteria for
the naming of parks and recreation facilities.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 8th day of September, 1992.
Ronald J. Parks, President
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Ternecula, HERI::-RY DO CERTIFY that the
foregoing Resolution No. CSD 92- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council
of the City of Temecula on the 8th day of September 1992 by the following roll call vote.
AYES: DIRECTORS:
NOES: DIRECTORS:
ABSENT:
DIRECTORS:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
Exhibit "A"
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTR/CT
Naming Parks and Recreation Facilities
PURPOSE
To establish a uniform policy and procedure that identifies
criteria for the naming of parks and recreation facilities.
POLICY
The Park and Recreation Commission will be responsible for the
selection of names for parks and recreation facilities. Once a
name is selected, it will be forwarded to the Board of Directors
for ratification. Staff will be responsible for encouraging
citizens and community organizations to suggest possible names that
will then be forwarded to the Commission for consideration.
At a minimum, each park and community building will be designated
a name. Naming of specific areas within a park (garden, swimming
pool, lake, ballfield, etc.) is acceptable but should be kept to a
minimum to avoid confusion. No park shall be given a name which
might be perceived as controversial by the community. All names
selected shall be acceptable and meaningful to a majority of the
neighborhood/community where the park or recreation facility is
located.
Priority in naming sites shall be given to geographical locations,
historic significance or geologic features. No park shall,'be named
for a person, except where an individual has made a significant
financial contribution toward the acquisition and/or development of
the park or facility, or has been an outstanding long-time
community leader who has supported open space and recreational
activities.
All park and recreation facilities will be designated a formal name
within six months of acquisition or construction. All parks shall
have an entrance sign. Buildings will have an entrance sign and a
plaque inside the facility for name identification.
The name of a park or recreation facility may be changed only after
a hearing is held by the Commission to receive community input and
direction. No name shall be changed unless there is significant
justification and support by the community.
RESPONSIBILITY ACTION
Department
Parks and
Recreation
Commission
Department
Acquires a new park or recreation
facility·
Solicits possible names from community'.
Forwards suggested names to the Parks and
Recreation Commission for consideration·
Receives any additional community input.
Selects a name for the new park or
recreation facility.
Forwards name
ratification.
to City Council for
Installs the appropriate naming sign or
plaque.
..~~ EXISTING PARKS AND FACILITIES
CITY OF TEMECULA ~ ~ ,~ ~ ~.'~-.
:$~SA~m' H,m~!CK~ 0.$ ACRES
MINI PARK 0.2S ACRES
IN! PARK 0.2S ACRES
FISCAL YEAR 1992-93
PARKS
Calle Aragon park
8lope 8q. Ft.
Turf Grass $q. Ft.
26,380
14,58
FISCAL YEAR 1992-93
PARKS
Aveaim De La Reina Park
81ope, Sq.
Turf Grass $q.
10,000
16,630
-- I.
RA,¥CilO CAZ, IFORN! A ~'
/F E I N~4 + --"'
CQRTE
TEMECULA REDVELOPMENT
AGENCY AGENDA
ITEM
1
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
HELD, TUESDAY AUGUST 11, 1992
A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency was held Tuesday, August
I 1, 1992, 9:25 P.M., at the Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula,
California. Chairperson Sal Mur~oz presiding.
PRESENT: 5
AGENCY MEMBERS:
Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Mu~oz,
Parks
ABSENT: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None
Also present were City Manager David Dixon, City Attorney Scott Field and City Clerk June
Greek.
PUBLIC COMMENT
None
AGENCY BUSINESS
1. Minutes
1.1
It was moved by Agency Member Birdsall, seconded by Agency Member Moore
to approve the minutes of July 14, 1992 as mailed.
The motion was carried as follows:
AYES: 5 AGENCY MEMBERS:
NOES:
Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore,
Mu~oz, Parks
0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
None given.
AGENCY MEMBER'S REPORTS
Agency Member Birdsall questioned the status of the Boys and Girls Club being relocated on
the Temecula Community Center property.
RDAMINBI11192 -1 - 912/12
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES AUGUST 11, 1992
City Manager David Dixon advised that it has been reviewed and the City has been requested
by the Town Association to participate in some of the site improvements.
Agency Member Mu~oz requested a periodic update on the status of the Redevelopment
Agency.
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Agency Member Moore, seconded by Agency Member Birdsall to adjourn at
9:30 P.M. The motion was carried unanimously.
The next regular meeting of the Temecula Redevelopment Agency will be held on Tuesday,
August 25, 1992, 8:00 P.M., Temecule Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula.
ATTEST:
Chairman J. Sal Mur~oz
June S. Greek, Agency Secretary
RDAMIN8111192 -2- 912/92
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
HELD, TUESDAY AUGUST 25, 1992
A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency was held Tuesday, August
25, 1992, 9:00 P.M., at the Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula,
California. Chairperson Sal Mu~oz presiding.
PRESENT: 5
AGENCY MEMBERS:
Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Mu~oz,
Parks
ABSENT: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None
Also present were City Manager David Dixon, City Attorney Scott Field and Administrative
Secretary Susan Jones.
PUBLIC COMMENT
None
AGENCY BUSINESS
Award of Contract for Construction of Mergerite Road Extension Interim Improvements
(PW 92-04)
Tim Serlet presented the staff report.
City Manager David Dixon stated that he was pleased with the response received from
Kemper Land Development in obtaining the right-of-way and expressed his thanks to
them for their consideration.
It was moved by Agency Member Birdsall, seconded by Agency Member Moore to
approve staff recommendation as follows:
1.1
Approve the award of contract for construction of Margarita Road
Extension Interim Improvements (Project No. PW 92-04) to R.J. Noble
Company for $511,500 and authorize the Chairperson of the
Redevelopment Agency ("RDA") and the City Clerk to execute said
contract.
1.2
Advance $562,650 from the General Fund Revolving Fund to the RDA.
1.3
Transfer $562,650 (bid amount plus 10% to allow for possible change
orders) from the RDA fund to the Capital Projects fund and appropriate
RDAMIN8/25192 - 1 - 912192
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES AUGUST 25, 1992
$562,650 to Account No. 021-165-606-5804.
1.4
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 92-
A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA DECLARING CERTAIN FINDINGS REGARDING CITY
EXPENDITURES IN CONNECTION WITH THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE
MARGARITA ROAD EXTENSION INTERIM IMPROVEMENTS AS
REQUIRED BY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
REGULATIONS (SECTION 1.103-18)
The motion was unanimously carried as follows:
AYES: 5
AGENCY MEMBERS:
Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Mur~oz,
Parks
NOES:
0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None
e
Construction Cost Participation for Storm Drain Improvements on From Streetll-15
with PM 22515 and CUP No. 5
Tim Serlet presented the staff report.
Agency Member Mu~oz suggested that if the City is having a maintenance problem,
the City could do the improvements now, and charge the developers who are
conditioned to make those improvements.
Tim Serlet stated that the reasoning behind staff's recommendation was that the
developer has approximately six years to record the map and another 18 months
bonding time before they would be required to put these improvements in.
Larry Markham, Markham & Associates, representing the applicant, advised that
originally, the developer had requested participation in the form of relief of plan check
fees, inspection fees, etc., however, the City was not willing to participate. The City
then looked at what their costs were to maintain that storm drain for the last two
years.
Agency Member Mur~oz asked if the developer had been approached with a
reimbursement agreement.
Tim Serlet stated that at the time of discussion of this situation, the approach was that
the City had a maintenance problem at the south end of Front Street. If the developer
can assist the City, the City will work with the developer.
RDAMINa/25192 -2- 912192
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES AUGUST 25, 1992
Mary Jane Henry advised that every year the Public Works Department must budget
for maintenance of this area. She added that the City has been receiving claims
relating to this area.
It was moved by Agency Member Lindemans, seconded by Agency Member Birdsall
to approve staff recommendation as follows:
2.1
2.2
Approve participation in the construction of a major storm drain under
Front Street in conjunction with the developers of PM 22515 and CUP
No. 5 in an amount not to exceed $34,000.
Direct General Counsel to prepare the necessary agreement on behalf of
the Redevelopment Agency.
2.3
The motion was carried as follows:
AYES: 4
NOES: 1
Authorize the Chairperson to sign the agreement.
AGENCY MEMBERS:
AGENCY MEMBERS:
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
None
AGENCY MEMBER'S REPORTS
None
ADJOURNMENT
Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Parks
Mu~oz
It was moved by Agency Member Birdsall, seconded by Agency Member Moore to adjourn at
9:00 P.M. The motion was carried unanimously.
The next regular meeting of the City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency will be held
Monday, September 8, 1992, 8:00 P.M., Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street,
Temecula, California.
June S. Greek, Secretary
Chairperson Sal J. Mur~oz
RDAMINBI25192 -3- 9/2192
ITEM
APPROVAL .-- -
CITY ATTORNEY~,~
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
AGENDA REPORT
Board, Redevelopment Agency
/T~.~" Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
September 8, 1992
Award of Professional Services Contract to Rick Engineering for Land
Surveying Services on the Margarita Road Extension Interim
Improvement Project, PW92-04
PREPARED BY: Michael D. Wolff, Senior Public Works Inspector
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Board:
1. Approve the award of a Professional Services Agreement in the amount of $40,000.00
to Rick Engineering for Land Surveying on the Margarita Road Extension Interim
Improvements, Project No. PW92-04, and authorize the Chairperson of the
Redevelopment Agency (R.D.A.), and the City Clerk to execute said contract.
2. Advance $40,000.00 from the General Fund/Revolving Fund to the R.D.A.
3. Transfer $40,000.00 from the R.D.A. fund to the Capital Projects Fund and
appropriate $40,000.00 to Account No. 021-165-606-5804.
4. Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 92-
A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
DECLARING CERTAIN FINDINGS REGARDING CITY EXPENDITURES IN CONNECTION
WITH CONSTRUCTION SURVEYING FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE MARGARITA
ROAD EXTENSION INTERIM IMPROVEMENTS AS REQUIRED BY UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY REGULATION (SECTION 1.103-18)
BACKGROUND:
In January, 1992, the Department of Public Works solicited qualifications from interested
engineering firms to provide the City with land surveying services (construction staking) for
pwO5~agdrpt\92%O908%pw92-O4.1nd 0831
various Capital Improvement Projects throughout the year of 1992. Eleven (11) firms
responded to the Request for Qualifications No. 004, and the responses were evaluated by
Public Works Staff. The top four firms were interviewed and ranked one through four. The
one through four ranking was necessary to establish a rotation basis f, or project award. The
ranking is as follows:
2.
3.
4.
J.F. Davidson Associates, Inc.
NBS/Lowry
Rick Engineering, Inc.
Robert Bein, William Frost & Associates
A contract with a defined scope of work and a hourly budget not to exceed $40,000.00 has
been negotiated.
FISCAL IMPACT
It is necessary to advance $40,000.00 from General Fund/Revolving Fund to the R.D.A.,
transfer $40,000.00 from the R.D.A. Fund to the Capital Projects Fund, and appropriate
$40,000.00 to Account No. 021-165-606-5804.
Attachment:
Professional Services Agreement
pwO5\egdrpt%92\O908~ow92-O4.1nd 0831
AGREEMENT
FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 8th day of September, 1992,
between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City" and
RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY hereinafter referred to as "Consultant"·
The parties hereto mutually agree as follows:
SERVICES. Consultant shall perform the tasks set forth in Exhibit "A" attached
her.to. Consultant shall complete the tasks according to the schedule set forth in
Exhibit "A".
PERFORMANCE. Consultant shall at all times, faithfully, industrially and to the best
of his ability, experience and talent, perform all tasks described her.in.
PAYMENT. The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, at the hourly rates set
forth in Exhibit "B" attached her.to, based upon actual time spent on the above
tasks· This amount will not exceed $40,000 for the total term of the Agreement
unless additional payment is approved by the City Council; orovided that the City
Manager may approve additional payments not to exceed ten percent (10%) of the
Agreement, but in no event more than $10,000.
Consultant will submit invoices monthly for actual services performed. Invoices
shall be submitted on or about the first business day of each month, for services
provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of
receipt of each invoice.
SUSPENSION. TERMINATION OR ABANDONMENT OF AGREEMENT. The City
may, at any time, suspend, terminate or abandon this Agreement, or any portion
hereof, by serving upon the Consultam at least ten (10) days prior written notice.
Upon receipt of said notice, the Consultant shall immediately cease all work under
this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. Within thirty-five (35) days
after receiving an invoice from the Consultant, the City shall pay Consultant for
work done through the date that work is to be ceased pursuant to this section.
If the City suspends, terminates or abandons a portion of this Agreement such
suspension, termination or abandonment shall not make void or invalidate the
remainder of this Agreement.
BREACH OF CONTRACT. In the event that Consultant is in default for cause under
the terms of this Agreement, the City shall have no obligation or duty to continue
compensating Consultam for any work performed after the date of default. Default
shall include not performing the tasks described herein to the reasonable
satisfaction of the City Manager of the City. Failure by the Consultant to make
progress in the performance of work hereunder, if such failure arises out of causes
beyond his control, and without fault or negligence of the Consultant, shall not be
considered a default.
2/formslARG-04 Rev 1/22/92 -1 - pwOS~w92.-O4'~staking.egt 082792
if the City Manager or his delegate determines that the Consultant defaults in the
performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall serve the
Consultant with written notice of the default. The Consultant shall have ten (10)
days after service upon it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering
a satisfactory performance. In the event that the Consultant fails to cure its default
within such period of time, the City shall have the right, notwithstanding any other
provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further notice and
without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity
or under this Agreement.
TERM. This Agreement shall commence on September 8, 1992, and shall remain
and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event
later than April 3, 1993.
Any disputes regarding performance, default or other matters in dispute between
the City and the Consultant arising out of this Agreement or breech thereof, shall
be resolved by arbitration. The arbitrator's decision shall be final.
Consultant shall select an arbitrator from a list provided by the City of three retired
judges of the Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services, Inc. The arbitration
hearing shall be conducted according to California Code of Civil Procedure Section
1280, et see. City and Consultant shall share the cost of the arbitration equally.
OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS. Upon satisfactory completion of, or in the event
of termination, suspension or abandonment of this Agreement, all original
documents, designs, drawings and notes prepared in the course of providing the
services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property
of the City and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by the City without
the permission of the Consultant. City agrees to hold harmless' and indemnify
Consultant for any use or reuse of any documents, designs, drawings, and notes
without the written consent of consultant.
INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. The Consultant is and shall at all times remain as
to the City a wholly independent contractor. Neither the City nor any of its officers,
employees or agents shall have control over the conduct of the Consultant or any
of the Consultant's officers, employees or agents, except as herein set forth. The
Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its
officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of
the City.
No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with the
performance of this Agreement. Except as provided in the Agreement, City shall
not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for performing
services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or
indemnification to Consultant for injury or sickness arising out of performing
services hereunder.
LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES. The Consultam shall keep itself informed of State and
Federal laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or
2/formelARG-O4 Rev 1122/92 -2- pw05%pw92-O4%staking.egt 082792
10.
11.
12.
in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The
Consultant shall at all times observe and comply with all such laws and regulations.
The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity
occasioned by failure of the Consultant to comply with this section.
NOTICE. Whenever it shall be necessary for either party to serve notice on the
other respecting this Agreement, such notice shall be served by certified mail,
postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the City Manager of the
City of Temecula, located at 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula , California
92590, and the Consultant at RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY, 3050 Chicago
Avenue, Riverside, CA 92507 unless and until different addresses may be
furnished in writing by either party to the other. Notice shall be deemed to have
been served seventy-two (72) hours after the same has been deposited in the
United States Postal Services. This shall be valid and sufficient service of notice
for all purposes.
ASSIGNMENT. The Consultam shall not assign the performance of this Agreement,
nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without the prior written
consent of the City.
Upon termination of this Agreement, Consultant's sole compensation shall be the
value to the City of the services rendered.
LIABILITY INSURANCE. The Consultant shall maintain insurance acceptable to the
City in full force an effect throughout the term of this contract, against claims for
injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection
with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, his agents,
representatives, employees or subcontractors. Insurance is to be placed with
insurer with a Bests' rating of no less than A:VII. The costs of such insurance shall
be included in the Contractor's bid. The Consultant shall provide the following
scope and limits of insurance:
A. Minimum Scooe of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
Insurance Services Office Form No. GL-0002 (Ed. 1/73) covering
Comprehensive General Liability and Insurance Services Office Form No.
GL-0404 covering Broad Form Comprehensive General Liability; or
Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage
("occurrence" Form No. CG-0001); or comparable forms.
Insurance Services Office Form No. CA-0001 (Ed. 1/78) covering
Automobile Liability, Code 1 "any auto" and Endorsement CA-0025; or
comparable forms.
Workers' Compensation insurance as required by Labor Code of the
State of California and Employers' Liability insurance.
4. Errors and Omissions insurance.
2/formslARG-04 Rev 1/22/92 -3- pwOS~pw92-O4\staking.egt 082792
Ce
Minimum Limits of Insurance. Contractor shall maintain limits of insurance no
less than:
General Liability: $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for
bodily injury and property damage.
Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 combined single limit per accident for
bodily injury and property damage.
Workers' Compensation and Employers' Liability: Workers'
Compensation as required by the Labor Code of the State of California
and Employers' Liability limits of $1,000,000 per accident.
4. Errors and Omissions Insurance: $1,000,000 per occurrence.
Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductible in excess of $1,000
must be declared to and approved by the City.
Other Insurance Provisions. Insurance policies required by this contract shall
contain or be endorsed to contain the following provisions:
ae
All Policies. Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be
endorsed to state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided,
canceled by either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after
thirty (30) days prior written notice to the City via United States First
Class Mail.
General Liabilitv and Automobile Liability coveraoes. The City, its
officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as
insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on
behalf of the Consultant; products and completed operations of the
Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used by the Consultant, or
automobiles owned, lease, hired or borrowed by the Consultant. The
coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection
afforded to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers.
With regard to claims arising from the Consultant's performance of the
work described in this contract, the Consultant's insurance coverage
shall be primary insurance as respects the City, its officers, officials,
employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained
by the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall apply in
excess of, and not contribute with, the Consultant's insurance.
Any failure to comply with the reporting provisions of the policies shall
not affect coverage provided to the City, its officers officials, employees
or volunteers·
The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured
against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to
the limits of the insurer's liability.
21formslARG-04 Rev 1/22/92 -4- pwO5%pw92-O4\staking.egt 082792
Worker's ComPensation and Employers' Liability Coveraae. The insurer
shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against the City, its
officers, officials, employees and volunteers for losses arising from work
performed by the Consultant for the City.
Verification of Coveraae. Contractor shall furnish the City with
certificates of insurance effecting coverage required by this clause. The
certificates for each insurance policy are to be signed by a person
authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The
certificates are to be on forms provided by the City and are to be
received and approved by the City before work commences. The City
reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required
insurance policies, at any time.
Consultant shall include all subconsultants as insureds under its policies
or shall furnish separate certificates for each subcontractor. All
coverages for subcontractors shall be subject to all of the requirements
stated herein.
Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and
approved by the City.
13.
LICENSES. The Consultant and subconsultant shall obtain all necessary licenses,
including but not limited to City Business License.
14.
INDEMNIFICATION. The Consultant agrees to indemnify and save harmless the
City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and all
claims, demands, losses, defense cost, or liability of any kind or nature which the
City, its officers, agents and employees may sustain or incur or Which may be
imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising
out of Consultant's negligent performance under the terms of this Agreement,
excepting only liability arising out of the sole negligence of the City.
15.
ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement and any documents or instrument attached
hereto or referred to herein integrate all terms and conditions mentioned herein or
incidental hereto supersede all negotiations and prior writing in respect to the
subject matter hereof.
In the event of conflict between the terms, conditions, or provisions of this
Agreement and any such document or instrument, the terms and conditions of this Agreement
shall prevail.
EFFECTIVE DATE AND EXECUTION: This Agreement shall be effective from and
after the date it is signed by the representatives of the City. This Agreement may be
executed in counterparts.
2/forms/ARG-O4 Rev 1/22/92 '5- PwO51pw92-O4%staking.egt 082792
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be
executed the day and year first above written.
CONSULTANT
RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
By
Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor
Print Name and Title
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Scott F. Field, City Attorney
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
2/formslARG-O4 Rev 1122192 -6- pw05%pw92-O4%staking.agt 082782
EXHIBIT "A"
TASKS TO BE PERFORMED
21formslARG-O4 Rev 1122192 EXHIBIT "A" pwO5~pw92-O4\staking.agt 082792
Page 4 of 9
This Agreement is made this 28th day of July, 1992, between the City of Temecula herein called
"Client," and Rick Engineering Company herein called "Consultant," for the performance of the
services listed below in conjunction with the project described herein:
I. GENERAL
The project consists of providing construction staking for the City of Temccula,
Project No. 92-04, this being the Margarita Road extension interim improvement
project.
Work to be done in accordance with approved plans provided by the City of
Temecula for said project site.
II.
SCOPE OF WORK
Consultant agrees to perform the following listed services for the compensation
stated below:
A. Final Field Engineering
The Consultant will provide one set of stakes for each of the' following
construction items:
1. Horizontal and Vertical Control
Verify existing horizontal and vertical alignment. Establish construction
control for project site.
2. Sawcut Removal
Existing asphalt will be marked to delineate the removal areas. Marks
will be set at not less than 50-foot intervals and will include all angle
points. No cut or f~l will be marked.
3. Rough Grading
Street Grading - (4000 L.F. of centerline) Slope stakes will be
offset to either the top of cut slopes or toe of fill slopes set at not
City of Temecula
July 28, 1992
Page 5 of 9
less than 50-foot intervals and will include all controlling angle
points and grade breaks.
Trapezoidal Channel Grading - (4500 L.F.) Slope stakes will be
offset to the top of the channel at not less than 50-foot intervals
and will include all controlling angle points and grade breaks.
Finish Grading
Finished Fading of street section will be accomplished by utilizing
the curb stakes outlined in Item IIA-7.
Trapezoidal Channel Grading - (4500 L.F.)
offset to the centerline of the channel.
reference to finished grade at flowline.
Stakes will be set
Cuts and fills will
Grade Verification
No grade verification will be performed for this project.
Storm Drain (750 L.F.. Three Inlets)
Stakes will be set at 25-foot intervals in the curved section and 50-foot
in the tangent sections. All BCR, ECR and grade break locations will
also be staked. All junction structures, inlets and other structures will
be controlled by a maximum of five stakes. Cuts and fills will be
referenced to flow line of pipe except for inlets, which will reference to
top of curb grade.
Curb/A.C. Berm/Redwood Header (8500 LF.)
Stakes will be set at 25-foot intervals and will include all BCR, ECR,
grade breaks and vertical curve locations. Cuts and fills will reference
to finish top of curb grade for curbs and A.C. berms, and reference to
finish surface for redwood headers.
Miscellaneous Relocations
One stake will be set to facilitate relocation of fire hydrants (three) and
valve locations (three). Grades will be referenced to top of curb for fire
hydrants and to finished surface for valves.
City of Temeeula
July 28, 1992
Page 6 of 9
10.
Monumentation
Will be set as shown on the final map. Reestablish any centerline
monumentation destroyed during construction. Cente~ine monuments
to be constructed by others.
Field Supervision
Provide field supervision for all project activities. Coordinate and
schedule with City of Temecula. Prepare and provide project progress
reports. Attend project development meetings as required.
B. Office Engineering
1.
Reseamh and compute eente~ine and fight-of-way from verified field
conditions.
Compute improvement locations, including all curbs, medians,
trapezoidal channels, storm drain, and storm drain appurtenances.
Field note reduction and computations for field support.
III.
FEES AND CHARGES
See Exhibit A
IV.
ADDITIONAL SERVICES
The following may be required, but are not included in the scope of work outlined
in Item II above. Additional authorization will be required for these services.
Changes in the scope of the project, directed and authorized by the Client in
writing after the start of work. In this ease, the revised work to be at the same
stage of completion as the original work at the time of the change order.
City of Temecula
July 28, 1992
Page 7 of 9
E.
F.
G.
H.
Work of a general or promotional nature not connected with the actual design,
approval, or construction of the project.
Any other services performed at the direction of the Client, which are not
defined in the above-listed services, shall be in addition to those set forth in
Item II of this agreement.
Design or staking of any recreational facilities.
Design or staking of any buttresses, key ways or subdrains.
Supervised grade inspections as required by the City.
As-built plans, except as outlined above.
Staking of Southern California Gas, Southern California Electric, Pacific Bell,
and Cable TV beyond Parking/pavement areas.
I. Staking of street striping.
J.
CLIENT FURNISHED FEES AND CHARGES
Client shall be respons~le and pay for the following:
A. All bonds.
B. Utility charges.
C. City and other public agency fees.
D. Soils engineering testing and inspection fees.
E. Title company fees.
F. Blueprinting and miscellaneous reproduction
contractor, agency, and other consultants.
G. Landscape and irrigation plans.
H. Potholing and cost of equipment rental.
Engineering services not specifically mentioned above.
costs required by Client,
City of Temecula
July 28, 1992
Page 8 of 9
VI. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
The Standard Provisions, set forth upon the Rick Engineering Form, are
incorporated herein and made a part of this agreement.
If notice to proceed is delayed for any reason beyond sixty (60) days, it is
understood by the parties that terms and conditions contained in Items II and
Ill are subject to change.
C. Adjustment of fees
Engineering fees for work performed six months aftcr the date of this
agreement shall be adjusted in proportion to the Engineering News Record
CENR) Construction Cost Index every six months utilizing the following as the
base:
ENR 4991.83 DATE July 20, 1992
RAS :DW/jz/11839SS .001
EXHIBIT "B"'
PAYMENT SCHEDULE
21formslARG-04 Rev 1/22192
EXHIBIT "B"
Pw05%Pw92-O4~,etaking.agt 082792
EXHIBIT A
FEES AND CHARGES
For the services outlined in II above, the Client agrees to pay the Consultant a total
fee as indicated below to be paid on a monthly basis for each item as work
progresses. All time will be billed per the following schedule:
A. Field Engineering
A-1 Control $ 2,000 T&M NTE
A-2 Sawcut $ 500 T&M E
A-3 Rough Grading
a) Street Grading $ 8,000 T&M NTE
b) Trapezoidal Channels $ 5,000 T&M NTE
A-4 Finish Grading
a) Street Grading $ -0- T&M NTE
b) Trapezoidal Channel $ 2,000 T&M NTE
A-5 Grade Verification $ -0- T&M NTE
A-6 Storm Drain $ 3,000 T&M NTE
A-7 Curb $ 8,000 T&M NTE
A-8 Relocations $1,000 T&M NTE
A-9 Monumentation $ 2,000 T&M NTE
A-10 Supervision $ 3.500 T&M NTE
$35,000
B. Office Engineering
B-1 Compute Centerline &
Right-of-Way $1,200 T&M NTE
B-2 Compute Improvements $ 2,000 T&M NTE
B-3 Field Support $1,800 T&M NTE
$ 5,000
TOTAL $40,000
Our staking prices are based on an eight-hour, two-man party crew day. Crew rate
($125 per hour) is based upon state prevailing wage rates for this district.
Fees and expenses will be billed monthly as the work progresses and the net amount
shall be due within thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of the invoice in the
Client's office.
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 92- 0 I~"
A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMRNT AGENCY OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA DECLARING CERTAIN
FINDINGS REGARDING CITY EXPENDITURES IN
CONNECTION WITH SURVEYING FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF THE MARGARITA ROAD
EXTENSION INTERIM IMPROVEM~NTS AS REQUIRED
BY UNrffx~ STATES DEPARTM~NT OF THE TREASURY
REGULATIONS (SECTION 1.103-18)
WHEREAS, on January 27, 1992, the United States Department of the Treasury (the
"Treasury") issued final regulations (Section 1.103-18)relating to the use of bond proceeds for
the reimbursement of expenditures made prior to the date of issuance of bonds (the
"Reimbursement Regulations"); and
WHEREAS, under the Reimbursement Regulations, in general, if specified requirements
are satisfied, the proceeds used for reimbursement are deemed to be spent on the date of
reimbursement; and
WHEREAS,if such requirements are not satisfied, then proceeds used for reimbursement
will remain subject to the rebate, arbitrage and other rules relating to tax-exemption until
ultimately spent; and
WHEREAS, the Reimbursement Regulations apply to tax-exempt obligations issued after
March 2, 1992, except that the Reimbursement Regulations do not apply to expenditures before
such date if such expenditures were made after September 8, 1989, and if there was objective
evidence at the time of the expenditures that the issuer reasonably expected to reimburse the
expenditure with bond proceeds; and
WHEREAS, the Temecula Re, development Agency ("Agency") desires to construct the
Margarita Road Extension Interim Improvements from Winchester Road to Solana Way at a total
cost of $700,000.00. The Agency further intends to reimburse itself for the cost of land
surveying of the project from the proceeds of Re, development Bonds the agency intends to issue
("Obligations"). Agency intends to make expenditures relating to the purchase and development
of the property in anticipation of issuance of the obligations collectively referred to as the
("Expenditure"); and
WHEREAS, in order to comply with the Reimbursement Regulations, the public interest
and convenience require that the agency officially declare its intent that the agency reasonably
expects to reimburse the Expenditure with proceeds of the Obligations;
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED, DETERMINED AND
DECLARED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula as follows:
Section 1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct.
Section 2. The agency reasonably expects to reimburse the Expenditure with proceeds
from the Obligations. The reimbursement of the Expenditure is consistent with the agency's
established budgetary and financial circumstances. There are no funds or sources of money of
the Agency, or any related person or commonly controlled entity, that have been, or reasonable
expected to be, reserved, allocated on a long-ten basis or otherwise set aside to pay costs of
the property to be paid or reimbursed out of proceeds of the Certificates.
Section 3. This Resolution is a declaration of Agency's official intent under the
Reimbursement Regulations.
Section 4. The maximum principal mount of the Obligations for which the Expenditure
is made is reasonably expected to be $40,000.00
Section 5. The proceeds from the Obligations are to be used for the Project.
Section 6. The City Clerk/Agency Secretary shall certify the adoption of this Resolution
and thenceforth and thereafter same shall be in full force and effect.
PASSRD, APPROVRD AND ADOPTED this 8th day of September, 1992.
A~T:
J. Sat Mu~oz, Chairperson
June S. Greek, City Clerk/
Redevelopment Agency Secretary
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE)
CITY OF TEMECULA )
SS
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk/Redevelopment Agency Secretary of the City of Temecula,
HEREBY DO CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. RDA 92- was duly adopted at a
regular meeting of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Tem~ula on the 8th day of
September, 1992, by the following roll call vote:
AYES: 5
AGENCY MEMBERS:
Birdsall, Moore, Lindemans, Mu~oz,
Parks
NOES:
0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None
ABSENY: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None
June S. Greek, City Clerk/
Redevelopment Agency Secretary
ITEM
NO.
3
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY r~,/:'~'
FINANCE OFFICEbOX"
CITY MANAGER..,
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
AGENDA REPORT
Board, Redevelopment Agency
,,~,,~' Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
September 8, 1992
Award of Professional Services Contract to Law/Crandall Incorporated
for Geotechnicel Services on the Margarita Road Extension Interim
Improvements Project, PW92-04
PREPARED BY: Michael D. Wolff, Senior Public Works Inspector
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Board:
,
Approve the award of a Professional Services Agreement in the amount of $6,300.00
to Law/Crandall Incorporated for Geotechnical Services on the Margarita Road
Extension Interim Improvements Project PW92~04, and authorize the Chairperson of
the Redevelopment Agency (R.D.A.), and the City Clerk to execute said contract.
Advance $6,300.00 from the General Fund/Revolving Fund to the R.D.A.
Transfer $6,300.00 from R.D.A. funds to Capital Projects Funds and appropriate
$6,300.00 to Account No. 021-165-606-5804.
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 92-
A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
DECLARING CERTAIN FINDINGS REGARDING CITY EXPENDITURES IN CONNECTION
WITH THE GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE
MARGARITA ROAD EXTENSION INTERIM. IMPROVEMENTS AS REQUIRED BY UNITED
STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY REGULATION (SECTION 1.103-18)
PwO5~agdrPt~92~O908\pw92-O4.geo 0831 ·
BACKGROUND:
In January, 1992, the Department of Public Works solicited qualifications from interested
engineering firms to provide the City with geotechnical soils testing services for various
Capital Improvement Projects throughout the year of 1992. Three firms responded to the
Request for Qualifications No. 003, and the responses were evaluated by Public Works Staff.
The three firms were interviewed and ranked one through three (1-3). All three firms have
the necessary qualifications to perform the desired geotechnical testing services for the
projects. Thus, the one through three (1-3) ranking was necessary to establish a rotation
basis for project award. The ranking is as follows:
Leighton and Associates
Law/Crandall, Incorporated
California Geo Tek, Incorporated
A contract with a defined scope of work and a hourly budget not to exceed $6,300.00 has
been negotiated.
FISCAL IMPACT
It is necessary to advance $6,300.00 from General Fund/Revolving Fund to the R.D.A.,
transfer $6,300.00 from the R.D.A. Fund to Capital Projects Fund, and appropriate $6,300.00
to Account No. 021-165-606-5804.
Attachment:
Professional Services Agreement
pwOS%egdrpt~,92\O908%pw92-O4.geo 0831a
AGREEMENT
FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 8th day of September, 1992,
between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City" and
LAW/CRANDALL, INC., a California corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Consultant".
The parties hereto mutually agree as follows:
SERVICES. Consultant shall perform the tasks set forth in Exhibit "A" attached
hereto. Consultant shall complete the tasks according to the schedule set forth in
Exhibit "A".
PERFORMANCE. Consistent with the standard of care set forth herein, Consultant
shall at all times, faithfully, industrially and to the best of his ability, experience and
talent, perform all tasks described herein.
PAYMENT. The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, at the hourly rates set
forth in Exhibit "B" attached hereto, based upon actual time spent on the above
tasks. This amount will not exceed $6,300 for the total term of the Agreement
unless additional payment is approved by the City Council; provided that the City
Manager may approve additional payments not to exceed ten percent (10%) of the
Agreement, but in no event more than $10,000.
Consultant will submit invoices monthly for actual services performed. Invoices
shall be submitted on or about the first business day of each month, for services
provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of
receipt of each invoice.
SUSPENSION, TERMINATION OR ABANDONMENT OF AGREEMENT. The City
may, at any time, suspend, terminate or abandon this Agreement, or any portion
hereof, by serving upon the Consultant at least ten (10) days prior written notice.
Upon receipt of said notice, the Consultant shall immediately cease all work under
this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. Within thirty-five (35) days
after receiving an invoice from the Consultant, the City shall pay Consultant for
work done through the date that work is to be ceased pursuant to this section.
If the City suspends, terminates or abandons a portion of this Agreement such
suspension, termination or abandonment shall not make void or invalidate the
remainder of this Agreement.
BREACH OF CONTRACT. In the event that Consultant is in default for cause under
the terms of this Agreement, the City shall have no obligation or duty to continue
compensating Consultant for any work performed after the date of default. Default
shall include not performing the tasks described herein to the reasonable
satisfaction of the City Manager of the City. Failure by the Consultant to make
progress in the performance of work hereunder, if such failure arises out of causes
beyond his control, and without fault or negligence of the Consultant, shall not be
considered a default.
2/forms/ARG-0~ Rev 1/22/92
-1-
Pw03~pw92-04~GEOTEC]tJ~GT 082092
If the City Manager or his delegate determines that the Consultant defaults in the
performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall serve the
Consultant with written notice of the default. The Consultant shall have ten (10)
days after service upon it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering
a satisfactory performance. In the event that the Consultant fails to cure its default
within such period of time, the City shall have the right, notwithstanding any other
provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further notice and
without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity
or under this Agreement.
TERM. This Agreement shall commence on September 8, 1992, and shall remain
and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event
later than April 30, 1993.
Any disputes regarding performance, default or other matters in dispute between
the City and the Consultant arising out of this Agreement or breech thereof, shall
be resolved by arbitration. The arbitrator's decision shall be final.
Consultant shall select an arbitrator from a list provided by the City of three retired
judges of the Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services, Inc. The arbitration
hearing shall be conducted according to California Code of Civil Procedure Section
1280, et sea. City and Consultant shall share the cost of the arbitration equally.
Upon satisfactory completion of, or in the event of termination, all instruments of
service, including original documents, designs, drawings, and notes prepared in the
course of providing the services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall
become the sole property of the City. In the event such instruments of service are
reused without the written consent of the Consultant, the City agrees to indemnify,
defend, and hold Consultant harmless from any and all claims or liabilities for injury
of loss arising from such unauthorized use.
OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS. All documents and reports prepared under the
terms of this Agreement shall be delivered to and become the property of the City.
Any reuse of such documents by the City shall be at the City's sole and exclusive
risk. The City accepts responsibility for any changes made to these documents and
for any use other than for that project for which they were intended after final
submittal by the Engineer. The City will hold the Engineer harmless for any such
use or changes.
INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. The Consultant is and shall at all times remain as
to the City a wholly independent contractor. Neither the City nor any of its officers,
employees or agents shall have control over the conduct of the Consultant or any
of the Consultant's officers, employees or agents, except as herein set forth. The
Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its
officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of
the City.
No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with the
performance of this Agreement. Except as provided in the Agreement, City shall
2/fot'ms/ARO-04 Rev 1/22/92 -2- pw03\pw92-O4%OEOTECH.AGT 0~2092
10.
11.
12.
not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for performing
services hereunder for City. The City shall not be liable for compensation or
indemnification to Consultant for injury or sickness arising out of performing
services hereunder.
LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES. The Consultant shall keep itself informed of State and
Federal laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or
in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The
Consultant shall at all times observe and comply with all such laws and regulations.
The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity
occasioned by failure of the Consultant to comply with this section.
NOTICE. Whenever it shall be necessary for either party to serve notice on the
other respecting this Agreement, such notice shall be served by certified mail,
postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the City Manager of the
City of Temecula, located at 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula , California
92590, and the Consultant at Law/Crandall, Inc., 10037 Barnes Canyon Road, San
Diego, California 92121, unless and until different addresses may be furnished in
writing by either party to the other. Notice shall be deemed to have been served
seventy-two (72) hours after the same has been deposited in the United States
Postal Services. This shall be valid and sufficient service of notice for all purposes.
ASSIGNMENT. The Consultant shall not assign the performance of this Agreement,
nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without the prior written
consent of the City.
Upon termination of this Agreement, Consultant's sole compensation shall be the
value to the City of the services rendered·
LIABILITY INSURANCE. The Consultant shall maintain insurance acceptable to the
City in full force an effect throughout the term of this contract, against claims for
injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in Connection
with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, his agents,
representatives, employees or subcontractors. Insurance is to be placed with
insurer with a Bests' rating of no less than A:VII. The costs of such insurance shall
be included in the Contractor's bid. The Consultant shall provide the following
scope and limits of insurance:
A. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
Insurance Services Office form no. GL-0002 (Ed. 1/73) covering
Comprehensive General Liability and Insurance Services Office form
number GL-0404 covering Broad Form Comprehensive General Liability;
or Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage
("occurrence" form CG-0001 ).
s
Insurance Services Office form no. CA-0001 (Ed. 1/78) covering
Automobile Liability, code 1 "any auto" and endorsement CA-0025.
2/fcnsss/ARC~04 Rev 1/Z2/92 '3- Pw03~)2-04~GEOT~X~I.AOT 0~20~2
Workers' Compensation insurance as required by Labor Code of the
State of California an Employers' Liability insurance·
4. Errors and Omissions insurance.
Minimum Limits of Insurance. Contractor shall maintain limits of insurance no
less than:
General Liability $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for
bodily injury and property damage.
Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 combined single limit per accident for
bodily injury and property damage.
Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability: Workers'
compensation as required by the Labor Code of the State of California
and Employers Liability limits of $1,000,000 per accident.
Errors and Omissions Insurance. $1,000,000 per claim, written on a
claims-made basis with a $2,000,000 annual aggregate.
Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductible in excess of $1,000
must be declared to and approved by the City.
Other Insurance Provisions. Insurance policies required by this contract shall
contain or be endorsed to contain the following provisions:
All Policies. Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be
endorsed to state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided,
canceled by either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after
thirty (30) days' prior written notice to the City via United States First
Class Mail·
General Liability and Automobile Liability Coveraaes. The City, its
officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as
insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on
behalf of the Consultant; products and completed operations of the
Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used by the Consultant, or
automobiles owned, lease, hired or borrowed by the Consultant. The
coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection
afforded to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers.
With regard to claims arising from the Consultant's performance of the
work described in this contract, the Consultant's insurance coverage
shall be primary insurance as respects the City, its officers, officials,
employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained
by the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall apply in
excess of, and not contribute with, the Consultant's insurance.
2/fm'ms/AR{3..(M Rev 1/22/92 "~" pw03~pw92-4M,~3EOTECI,I.AGT 0~2092
13.
14.
15.
Any failure to comply with the reporting provisions of the policies shall
not affect coverage provided to the City, its officers officials, employees
or volunteers.
The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured
against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to
the limits of the insurer's liability.
Worker's Comoensation and Emolovers Liability Coverage. The insurer
shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against the City, its
officers, officials, employees and volunteers for losses arising from work
performed by the Consultant for the City.
Verification of CoveraQe. Contractor shall furnish the City with
certificates of insurance effecting coverage required by this clause. The
certificates for each insurance policy are to be signed by a person
authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The
certificates are to be on forms provided by the City and are to be
received and approved by the City before work commences. The City
reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required
insurance policies, at any time.
Consultant shall include all subconsultants as insureds under its policies
or shall furnish separate certificates for each subcontractor. All
coverages for subcontractors shall be subject to all of the requirements
stated herein.
Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and
approved by the City. At the option of the City, either: the insurer shall
reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self insured retentions as
respects the City, its officers, officials and employees; or the Consultant
shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related
investigations, claim administration and defense expenses.
LICENSES. The Consultant and subconsultant shall obtain all necessary licenses,
including but not limited to City Business License.
INDEMNIFICATION. The Consultant agrees to indemnify and save harmless the
City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and all
claims, demands, losses, defense cost, or liability of any kind or nature which the
City, its officers, agents and employees may sustain or incur or which may be
imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising
out of Consultant's negligent performance under the terms of this Agreement,
excepting only liability arising out of the active negligence of the City.
ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement and any documents or instrument attached
hereto or referred to herein integrate all terms and conditions mentioned herein or
incidental hereto supersede all negotiations and prior writing in respect to the
subject matter hereof.
2/forms/ARCj-I~ ~ 1/22/92
-5-
Fw03\pw92-04~,OEOTISCH.AOT 0~20~2
In the event of conflict between the terms, conditions, or provisions of this
Agreement and any such document or instrument, the terms and conditions of this Agreement
shall prevail.
EFFECTIVE DATE AND EXECUTION: This Agreement shall be effective from and
after the date it is signed by the representatives of the City. This Agreement may be
executed in counterparts.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be
executed the day and year first above written.
CONSULTANT
LAW\CRANDALL, INC.
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
By
Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor
Print Name and Title
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Scott F. Field, City Attorney
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
2/fotnu/ARG-0~ i~v 1/'2~92 -6- !~w03~92-04~GEO1'~-lI.AGT 0820~2
EXHIBIT "A"
TASKS TO BE PERFORMED
2/forms/ARG-04 Roy 1~2~./t~2 EXHIBIT "A" ~X~-O~XO~OT~CU~AO'r OS~O~
IJi.W/C~,A{-I-~ I~C. · geotechnical, enviromental & construction materials consultants
10037 Barnes Canyon Road, Suite A, San Diego, California 92121, Phone (619) 458-9379, Fax (619) 458-0541
Los Angeles · Ariahelm · Los Alamitos · Marina del Rey · Riverside · San Diego
July 17. 1992
Mr. Michael D. Wolff
Senior Public Works Inspector
City of Tcmecula
Department of Public Works
43174 Business Park Drive
Tcmecula, Cali|brnia 92590
Deal' Mr. Wolff:
Prolms.-i! - Geotechnical Oi~serv:lti.n
and Testing Services
PROJECT NO. PW 92-04
Margarit:t Road Extension and
haterim 1 reprovemerits
Ten~ecx, la. C'alili~rnia
As you requested. we are pleased to present this proposal to provide geotechnical
obser',,ation and testing services for the subject project. We have reviewed the project
plans and specifications to become familiar with the proposed construction and
requirements. Based on our review, the project will consist of excavation and grading for
the extension of Margarita Road between Winchester Road and Solana Way. Also
included is the installation of 24-, 30-, and 60-inch RCP storm drains. Part of the roadway
extension will involve asphalt concrete overlay. Based on our discussions with you, the
project duration is to be 75 days.
Our scope of serx, iccs for this project will include periodic observation of the excavation
and grading. density testing of the compacted tills and laborator), testing of roadway
materials. Our st:rvices will be on an :is-requested basis under City of Temecula
coordination. A breakdown of our estimated fees is presented below:
Gradin-. Observation and Field Testing ............................... $5,700
Ser,,ices for this phase will include periodic observation and testing by our field
technician. Density tests will be performed on the subgrade and base course
in roadway and sidewalk areas, and in storm drain trench backfill using sand
cone (ASTM Designation D1556-82) or nuclear (ASTM D2922-81) test
methods. We estimate 90 man-hours may be necessary for the 75-day
construction schedule.
Laboratory Testin~ ................................................ 600
Our laboratory testing will include two R-values, one sieve analysis, one sand
equivalent, and one durability index.
Total Estimate $6.300
City of Tcmccula
Page 2
July 17. 1992
Thc cstim. atcd fcc is a not-to-exceed ~o. ure bascd on the indicated man hours and
laboratory testing. If we arc requested tbrh orc hours than estimated. additional time will
bc necessary and will be billed on a time-and-expense basis in accordance with the rates
given in the attached Schedule of Charges for Inspection Services. Our fee includes a
surcharge of 15 percent on all field testing and observation. wi~ich covers field supervision.
administration, and report preparation. No additional charges will bc made fbr travel to
the site.
Our arca of expertise does not include construction safety. Accordingly. our services will
not include review of. nor responsibility tbr. construction safety during the course of this
project.
We can also provide construction materials testing and inspection as necessary. such as for
concrete structures. Our field technicians are ACI certified and can prepare concrete
samples. For estimating purposes, a charge of $13 per cylinder break would be added to
the above charges.
The terms contained in our "Agreement tbr Professional Services" dated April 20. 1992 for
the current PW92-01 project remain applicable for this project. This letter and its
attachments are the agreement tbr our services. Please confirm your authorization of this
work by signing and returning one copy to our office.
We appreciate the opportunity to work with you on this project. Please call us if you have
any questions.
Sincerely,
LAW/CRANDALL INC.
Robert A. Tortes, RCE 43077
Project Engineer
GP/RAT:hc
Attachments (2)
(3 copies submitted)
John R. Theissen. GE 825
Chief Engineer
Manager, Geotechnic,.nl Engineering
Approved and Accepted
By
Title
Date
LAW/CRANDAI.I., INC, * geotechnical. environmental & construction materials consultams
1003' Barnes Canv<m I~{~ad. Suite A. San l)i~g~}. California 9212 I. Phone ~(~ l t)~ 4~8-t)3'9. Fax ~61~ -~s-,~41
Los Angeles · Anahem~ · Los Alamm~s i Marina del Rey · Riverside ~ ~an Dicg' ~
CO~I~ON$ OF SER~CE
The following conditions are applicable to our inspection services in addition to any
stated in our proposal:
A minimum of one working day's notice shall be given us prior to the
need for our services. Our dispatcher should be contacted at (619) 458-
9379.
"Inspection" by our firm on this project shall be defined as the testing of
samples from random locations and the making of visual observations
relating to earthwork and/or construction materials upon timely
notification, and shall be limited to those services. The work will be
performed using that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised, under
similar circumstances, by reputable geotechnical and construction
materials consultants practicing in this or similar localities.
®
The presence of our field representative will be for the purpose of
providing the owner with a source of professional service, based on
observations and testing of the contractor's work. He will primarily look
for general conformance to the intent of the plans and specifications.
Any discrepancy noted will be referred to the owner's representative,
architect, structural engineer, or contractor for appropriate action.
Observation and testing of earthwork or construction materials does not
imply a guarantee or warranty of the contractor's work, and the services
performed by our firm shall not excuse the contractor in the event of
subsequently discovered defects in his work. Our presence or absenc~ at
the site shall not affect the contractor's obligation to perform in
accordance with the specifications.
Our services do not include responsibility for the superintendence of
construction processes, or direction of the actual work of the contractor
or the contractor's workmen. Also, since surveying is not within our
scope of services, we are not responsible for the lateral limits of grading,
the depths of excavations, or the final surface contours and configurations
indicated by markers, such as stakes and hubs, set by others.
s
It should be understood that we are not responsible for, nor are we to
review adequacy of, job safety on this project. The responsibility for job
safety must be borne by the contractor, or specially designated safety
personnel.
January 1992
EXHIBIT "B"
PAYMENT SCHEDULE
2/fomu/ARC~04 R~ IF2~52
EXHIBIT "B"
LAW/CRANDALL, INC. · geotechnical. envirom'nent:tl & construction materiztls consub:mrs
1003' Barnes Canyon Road. Suite A. Xm Diego. California 92121. Phone ~619~ -~8-t}3'9. Fax 1(3It)~ 4~g-0~-{
Los Angdes i Ariahelm ~ Los Alamitos I Marina del Rev i Riverside ~ San
SCHEDULE OF CHARGES FOR
GEOTECHNICAL INSPECTION SERVICES
The fee for our services will be based on the charEes listed below. All fee quotations are applicable for a period of 90 days
from the date of the proposal to which this schedule is attached. We reserve the riBht to modify these rates upon 30 days
advance notice.
PERSONNEL
Soil Technician - Regular time .......................... $ 55 per hour
Overtime as Required ................................ $ 65 per hour
For preparation of a final report and for provision of field supervision and office and
field administration, a 15% surebarge wffi be applied on the monthly invoices for the
total soil technician fees charged to the project.
These charges include field testing related to our inspe:tion services, sunln as field dens~ and compaction testing, and/or the
observation of tie.back anchor testing. In addition, thes~ charges include the us~ of a'tmc. k and field testing equipment, except
for nuclear testing devices whieh { be char~d at I;50 per day, or any part thereof. Overtime will apply to time in excess of
ciBht hours per weekday and all time on Saturdays, Sundays, and holidays. A minimum daily charEe of three hours wffi be
made. The minimum total charge for any one project will be $1,000.
The services of an engineer and/or BeoloBist, or special field or laboratory testing, if required in the interest of the projea, will
be invoiced in ao~ordance with the rates on our Schedule of Char~s for C~otechnical Engineering Services on the revers~
hereof.
Services that will 'require specially trained personnel, because of the presence of hazardous material, as defined by the
Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response Act, 29CIFR 1910.120, will be surcharged an additional 5% of the
above hourly rates.
Travel time wB1 not be charged for jobs within 50 miles of our nearest office. Travel and/or subsistence expenses for soil
technician services for projects in excess of 50 miles from our nearest office will be negotiated on an individual basis.
REIMBURSABLE rrEMs
Outside sen4c~s performed by others and direct expenses incurred on the client's behalf are charged at 1.15 times our cost.
Such items include, but are not limited to, outside consultants and testing laboratories if necessary and pre-approved by the
client.
INSURANCE
I2w/Crandall, In~., maintains General LiabiliW hsurance for bodily injury and property damage with an aB~regate limit of
1;1,000,000 per occurrence for its own account and w~l furnish certificates of such insurance upon request. In the event the
client desires additional coverage, we will, upon the client's written request, obtain additional insurance at the client's expense.
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 92-
A RESOLUTION OF THE R~nEVELOPMF~NT AGENCY OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA DECLARING CERTAIN
FINDINGS REGARDING CITY EXPENDITURES IN
CONNECTION WITH THE GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES
FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE MARGARITA ROAD
EXTENSION INTERIM IMPROVEM~NTS AS REQUIREn
BY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
REGULATIONS (SECTION 1.103-18)
WHEREAS, on January 27, 1992, the United States Department of the Treasury (the
"Treasury") issued final regulations (Section 1.103-18) relating to the use of bond proceeds for
the reimbursement of expenditures made prior to the date of issuance of bonds (the
"Reimbursement Regulations"); and
WHEREAS, under the Reimbursement Regulations, in general, if specified requirements
are satisfied, the proceeds used for reimbursement are deemed to be spent on the date of
reimbursement; and
WHEREAS,if such requirements are not satisfied, then proceeds used for reimbursement
will remain subject to the rebate, arbitrage and other rules relating to tax-exemption until
ultimately spent; and
WHEREAS, the Reimbursement Regulations apply to m-exempt obligations issued after
March 2, 1992, except that the Reimbursement Regulations do not apply to expenditures before
such date if such expenditures were made after September 8, 1989, and if there was objective
evidence at the time of the expenditures that the issuer reasonably expected to reimburse the
expenditure with bond proceeds; and
WHEREAS, the Temecula Redevelopment Agency ("Agency") desires to construct the
Margarita Road Extension Interim Improvements from Winchester Road to Solana Way at a total
cost of $700,000.00. The Agency further intends to reimburse itself for the cost of Geotechnicai
Services for the project from the proceeds of Re-development Bonds the agency intends to issue
("Obligations"). Agency intends to make expenditures relating to the purchase and development
of the property in anticipation of issuance of the obligations collectively referred to as the
("Expenditure"); and
WHEREAS, in order to comply with the Reimbursement Regulations, the public interest
and convenience require that the agency officially declare its intent that the agency reasonably
expects to reimburse the Expenditure with proceeds of the Obligations;
NOW TFIEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED, DETERMINED AND
DECLARED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula as follows:
Section 1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct.
Section 2. The agency reasonably expects to reimburse the Expenditure with proceeds
from the Obligations. The reimbursement of the Expenditure is consistent with the agency's
established budgetary and financial circumstances. There are no funds or sources of money of
the Agency, or any related person or commonly controlled entity, that have been, or reasonable
expected to be, reserved, allocated on a long-term basis or otherwise set aside to pay costs of
the property to be paid or reimbursed out of proceeds of the Certificates.
Section 3. This Resolution is a declaration of Agency's official intent under the
Reimbursement Regulations.
Section 4. The maximum principal mount of the Obligations for which the Expenditure
is made is reasonably expected to be $6,300.00
Section 5. The proceeds from the Obligations are to be used for the Project.
Section 6. The City Clerk/Agency Secretary shall certify the adoption of this Resolution
and thenceforth and thereafter same shall be in full force and effect.
PASSED, APPROVEr} AND ADOPTED this 8th day of September, 1992.
ATTEST:
J. Sal Mu~oz, Chairperson
June S. Greek, City Clerk/
Redevelopment Agency Secretary
[SEAL]
2111.m, IDA~r24}6 2
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk/Redevelopment Agency Secretary of the City of Tcmecula,
HEREBY DO CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. RDA 92- was duly adopted at a
regular meeting of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Tem~ula on the 8th day of
September, 1992, by the following roll call vote:
AYES: 5
AGENCY MEMBERS:
Birdsall, Moore, Lindemans, Mu~oz,
Parks
NOES:
0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None
June S. Greek, City Clerk/
Redevelopment Agency Secretary