The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About052401 PTS AgendaIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk at (909) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR35.102.35.104 ADA Title III CALL TO ORDER: FLAG SALUTE ROLL CALL: PRESENTATIONS: AGENDA TEMECULA PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION TO BE HELD AT CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, California Thursday, May 24, 2001 at 6:00 P.M. COMMISSIONERS: Coe, Connerton, Katan, Lanier, Edwards Pat Comerchero - Web Site Presentation - Public Transportation Options in Temecula Lt. Gollogly - Emergency Services Team (SWAT) PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Commission on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Commission about an item not listed on the Agenda, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Commission Secretary. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address. For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the Recording Secretary before the Commission gets to that item. Them is a three (3) minute time limit for individual speakers. NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless members of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. COMMISSION CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Minutes of March 22, 2001 and April 26, 2001 RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the Minutes of March 22, 2001 (To be delivered under separate cover) 1.2 Approve the Minutes of April 26, 2001 (To be delivered under separate cover) r:\traffic\commissn\agenda~2001\05~01 Ag~nda/ajp COMMISSION BUSINESS 2. Haveston Community Mobility Enhancement Plan (CMEP) RECOMMENDATION: 2. ! That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission receive and file a report on the Harveston Community Mobility Enhancement Plan (CMEP). 3. Proposed Capital Improvement Program - Fiscal Years 2002-2006 RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission review and discuss the proposed circulation projects in the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for Fiscal Years 2002-2006. 4. Traffic Engineer's Report 5. Police Chief's Report 6. Fire Chief's Report 7. Commission Reports ADJOURNMENT The next regular meeting of the City of Temecula Public/Traffic Safety Commission will be held on Thursday, June 28, 2001, at 6:00 P.M., Temecula City Hall, Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. 2 r :\tra fficXcommissn\agenda~2001 \052401 Agenda/ajp ITEM NO. I MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION MARCH 22, 2001 CALL TO ORDER The City of Temecula Public/Traffic Safety Commission convened in a regular meeting at 6:00 P.M., on Thursday, March 22, 2001, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. FLAG SALUTE The audience was led in the Flag salute by Commissioner Connerton. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Coe, Connerton, *Katan, Lanier, and Chairwoman Edwards. Absent: None. Also Present: Director of Public Works Hughes, Deputy Director of Public Works Parks, Senior Engineer Moghadam, Associate Engineer Gonzalez Police Sergeant DiMaggio, Police Officer Kubel, Administrative Secretary Pyle, and Minute Clerk Hansen. *(Commissioner Katan arrived at 6:04 P.M.) PRESENTATION Every Fifteen Minute Proqram (EFMP) Presentation by Deputy Kubel It was noted for the record that Commissioner Katan arrived at 6:04 P.M. Officer Kubel presented a video in which local students dramatized a drinking and driving incident involving fatalities which was developed in order to educate high school students regarding the dangers of driving under the influence of alcohol, relaying the fact that every fifteen minutes in the United States someone is killed by a drunk driver, and that alcohol collisions are the leading cause of death among teenagers; noted that this was the second Every Fifteen Minute Program (EFMP) presentation that the Temecula Police Department has organized, relaying that last year it was held at Temecula Valley High School and this year at Chaparral High School, advising that approximately 350 volunteers from approximately 30 agencies were involved in the making of the film, and the success of the program; for Commissioner Lanier, provided additional information regarding the second day of the program after the mock accident whereby a student is R:\trafficminutes~121400 I removed from class every fifteen minutes (to emphasize that fact the every fifteen minutes an individual in the United States is killed by a drunk driver), and the teens (involved in the mock fatalities) are separated from their families while additional speakers address the hazards of driving under the influence of alcohol, and letters are written (by the parents and the teens) describing the experience of being separated, and that the subsequent day the families are reunited and the letters are read. Noting the effectiveness of this program, Chairwoman Edwards queried how the Public/Traffic Safety Commission could become involved in the program. In response, Officer Kubel relayed that each year numerous individuals volunteered for the program, noting the various tasks accomplished over an eight-month planning period. Chairwoman Edwards noted that all the Public/Traffic Safety Commissioners had a desire to aid in the facilitation of this tremendous program, requesting Police Sergeant DiMaggio to update the Commission as to the timing of the organizing for next year's event. Commending Officer Kubel, Police Sergeant DiMaggio relayed the assiduous efforts Mr. Kubel dedicated to organizing this program, noting the months of organizing. For Commissioner Coe, Officer Kubel relayed that if special groups (i.e., driving schools) were interested in having a copy of the film, that the Police Department could provide information regarding obtaining this film. Commissioner Coe, echoed by Chairwoman Edwards, relayed that this film was not only educational but also emotionally touching. PUBLIC COMMENTS Mr. Warren Knox, 44885 Muirfield Drive, relayed his concern regarding the speeds of vehicles on Muirfield Drive, advising that this area was being utilized for cut-through traffic; and requested that the Public/Traffic Safety Commission to consider the feasibility of installing speed undulations, the placement of radar trailers, and Police enforcement. For Chairwoman Edwards, Police Sergeant DiMaggio noted that the radar trailer had been placed in this area, and that the Traffic Calming Program had been initiated. Mr. Sam Pratt, 40470 Brixton Cove, noted his encouragement due to the attendance of numerous community members at this meeting, relaying that in his opinion there was not a more important meeting in town; referenced the City Newsletter, relaying the informational data included, recommending that a Driving Tip be included on the front page; and per recent discussions with developers currently planning projects in the City of Temecula, noted that he was pleased with the attitude and efforts aimed at addressing traffic impacts in the City. COMMISSION CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Minutes of December 147 2000~ and January 11~ 2001 RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 1.2 Approve the Minutes of December 14, 2000. Approve the Minutes of January 11, 2001. MOTION: Commissioner Connerton moved to approve the minutes of December 14, 2000. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Lanier and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. MOTION: Commissioner Connerton moved to approve the minutes of January 11, 2001. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Lanier and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Commissioner Coe who abstained. COMMISSION BUSINESS 2. Request for Left-Turn Access - Ynez Road at Saric Court RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission deny the request to rescind left-turn access restrictions at the intersection of Ynez Road and Saric Court. Providing a background of the issue, Senior Engineer Moghadam specified the location of the intersection at Ynez Road/Saric Court which provided access from Ynez Road to four parcels; advised that typically staff determined whether left-turn access was safe, noting that this matter was before the Public/Traffic Safety Commission due to the request of Chairwoman Edwards; clarified the rationale for staff determination that left access in or out of this small cul-de-sac off of Ynez Road was not appropriate, noting the proximity to the signalized intersection at Santiago Road, relaying that Ynez Road was an arterial road (which is 64 feet wide with four lanes, with bike lanes on both sides) with approximately 10,600 vehicles per day at this time, noting the anticipated 18,000 trips per day at build out on this portion of Ynez Road; relayed staff's concern regarding the speeds and volumes on Ynez Road with left-turn access into this cul-de-sac; reiterated that staff deemed left-turn access at Saric Court not safe, recommending that the striping be double solid lines to restrict left turns in or out of this cul-de-sac; acknowledged that this restriction would cause inconvenience to the residents, while noting that this was justified due to the ultimate 18,000 vehicles traveling on Ynez Road; relayed that the location of this access point was within a left-turn pocket which would be ultimately extended when Santiago Road goes through eastward; and advised that based on the safety issues, staff determined that left-turns in this area should be restricted. Noting the safety hazards associated with allowing vehicles to make a left turn in the middle of a left-turn pocket, Commissioner Coe noted his support of staff's determination. R:~rafficminutes~121400 3 For Commissioner Lanier, Police Sergeant DiMaggio noted that at times he received calls regarding speeding in this area on Ynez Road, advising that placement of the radar trailer effectively slowed the vehicles. In response to Chairwoman Edwards, Senior Engineer Moghadam provided information regarding alternate left-turn access points in the City, advising that to the best of his knowledge staff has not approved any full access movements this near a signalized intersection on a busy street. With respect to future improvements to extend Santiago Road, Director of Public Works Hughes relayed that there was no CIP ptan scheduled for the immediate future, while noting that the City has been contacted by the residents in the Santiago, John Warner Roads area with regard to paving the streets, advising that by virtue of these streets becoming paved streets it could potentially develop into a project connecting Santiago Road within the next 1-2 years. In response to Commissioner Connerton's queries regarding the similarity of the situation at the Marie Callender's Use on Ynez Road/Rancho Highland Drive, Director of Public Works Hughes noted that this condition was a temporary situation, relaying that the Marie Callender's use has been noticed that as soon as Rancho Highland Drive is constructed to Tierra Vista Road there will be a raised median and the turning movements will be restricted, advising that while there were locations such as this located in the City that it was not a preferred design due to the safety issues. For Commissioner Coe, Director of Public Works Hughes provided information regarding the development plan in the area of discussion. Mr. Larry Markham, representing the applicant of the associated application, provided a brief history of the project, noting the initial approval of the map on September 10, 1991, which included no condition to restrict access into the project, advising that if there would have been restricted access, the map would have been redesigned; relayed the numerous extensions of time for the project, noting that the street plans were reactivated and signed in December, 1999, which did not include a condition restricting access, advising that the map recorded on May 23, 2000; noted that the striping plan was submitted at the latter part of 2000 which is when this restricted access issue was introduced; provided additional information regarding approval of a neighboring project on March 15, 2000 with no restrictions with respect to access, acknowledging that this area was located further from the signalized intersection; opined that the owner of this property should have been made aware of the restricted access to this property at an earlier date, advising that if there is a desire to restrict access to this reach that it should be restricted in total and not to only one property, providing additional information regarding the proximate properties; relayed that since this property was not conditioned as such, it was not equitable to restrict access at this time, acknowledging that at some future point there may be a median installed on Ynez Road which would restrict access at that time; and noted that this issue has become a burden for the applicant since access was not restricted at the time of approval. Chairwoman Edwards queried whether the City Council approved the current striping conditions in May of 2000. In response, Mr. Markham clarified that it was the final map which was approved for recordation, noting that the map was originally approved in 1991, advising that the street improvement plans for the actual construction of the cul- de-sac and the widening of Ynez were approved approximately in December of 1999 without the striping plans; for Commissioner Coe, noted that these plans were complete and ready to record including the relocation of the signal at Santiago Road/Ynez Road in 1993, relaying that the recession postponed the plans, advising that the plans were subsequently phased and reactivated in 1999; and clarified that the access restriction was a change by City staff in the midst of plan check after the street plans were signed and the final map was approved and recorded. Commissioner Coe queried whether it would be beneficial for the purchasers of the three remaining parcels to know that at a future point there would be a median in this left-turn area. In response, Mr. Markham relayed that potential buyers would be made aware that at some point in the future there may be a raised median restricting access; and noted that he was opposed to restricting access at this point in time only to this property and not along the whole reach. In response to Commissioner Connerton, Mr. Markham confirmed that the throat of the cul-del-sac has already been improved. Mr. Robert Saric, 33246 Calle Langarcia, owner of the property in discussion, noted that he purchased the property in order to construct a home at the site; relayed that prior to the close of escrow he met with the seller (Mr. Meyler), Mr. Markham, and the selling agent to query the left turn access issue due to the final map being approved without the striping plan, noting that the meeting discussions provided assurance that left-turn access would not be restricted; while referencing the concerns of City staff, opined that restricting this access was not a valid safety issue based on the other left-turn accesses on this same street; and advised that the access issue has postponed him from moving forward with his project, and the sale of the other two parcels, relaying hopes that there would be an equitable resolution. Mr. Brian Sampson, 40655 Calle Medusa, the listing agent for the property, relayed that per traveling through the City he cited 12 other similar areas (proximate to a signalized intersection and located off of a busy street) that had no restrictions with respect to access; advised that the property owner had moved forward with plans based on the Conditions of Approval (COA's) associated with approval of this application which did not include restrictions with respect to access, advising that if staff opined that access was an issue it should have been addressed in 1999 and prior years; and with respect to safety issues, advised that a U-turn on a busy street was more dangerous than a left turn onto a busy street. In response to Commissioner Connerton, Mr. Sampson clarified that he was opposed to the left-turn restricted access; and for Commissioner Coe, noted that information related to the future median would be disclosed to future buyers. Commenting on Mr. Sampson's referenced 12 similar sites where access was not restricted, Commissioner Coe relayed an interest to visit these areas if Mr. Sampson could provide a list of the properties. Mr. Jim Meyler, 29930 Santiago Road, noted that at the Planning Commission hearing (approximately 10 years ago) where this application was approved that the subject of access into this property was discussed and it was agreed that it would be off of Ynez Road (relaying that while Commissioner Fahey had noted concern regarding this R:~trafficrninutes~121400 5 access, the other four Planning Commissioners had not), advising that left-turn access restrictions were never addressed, and the application was approved unanimously; while expressing his admiration for Director of Public Works Hughes and staff for their great work, noted that this decision (to restrict access) was based on opinion and not laws or regulations, reiterating the previously referenced similar locations throughout the City where access was not restricted; and relayed the possibility for the City to have to address the issue legally if there is financial damage suffered if this matter is not dealt with equitably. In response to Commissioner Coe, Mr. Meyler confirmed his knowledge that at a future point if a median was installed on Ynez Road, access would be restricted; noted that he did not agree that 10,600 cars traveled this podion of Ynez Road daily, providing information regarding his traveling patterns accessing this area, relaying that nine out of ten times there was no wait when making a right turn into the project. Commissioner Connerton noted that per information revealed at this meeting, the developer had the clear understanding that access to this project would not be restricted (via the COA's associated with approval of the application), advising that the City did have the mechanism at a future point, if necessary to restrict the left turns; and relayed that it would be equitable to allow the access at this time, noting his support in denying staff's recommendation. Noting that it appeared that the access restriction was presented at the 11th hour to the developer, Commissioner Lanier concurred with Commissioner Connerton. Chairwoman Edwards noted that she had requested that this item be agendized for all the reasons that have been discussed; relayed that she had had discussions with Director of Public Works Hughes, Senior Engineer Moghadam, Mr. Saric, and Mr. Meyler; confirmed that the access issue was clearly not a black and white matter; noted that she had the greatest respect for Director of Public Works Hughes' advise, relaying that the issue that troubled her with regard to this matter was that the rules changed in the middle of the game for the developer (i.e., access restrictions were not addressed at the time of the approval of the application), noting her strong belief in properly rights; advised that she was reluctant to approve a situation where there were safety issues at risk, noting the liability risks to the City; acknowledged th. at disclosure would be provided to the future property owners in light of this noticed meeting, and that at some point a median would be constructed on Ynez Road, and that Santiago Road would be extended; advised that the most critical issue at this point was safety; and noted that at this point she would support rescinding the restrictions for left-turn access due to it appearing to be a safe movement at this point in time, relaying that when the median is constructed and Santiago Road is widened this access would change. Concurring with Mr. Markham and Mr. Saric, Commissioner Katan relayed that they should have been aware of the access restrictions at an earlier date, if at all possible, while advising that if mistakes with respect to access exist along Ynez Road, it should not be continued due to the safety issues at hand; and concluded that while it would have been better if the applicant would have been notified of the access restrictions earlier in the approval process, that he would support staff's recommendation due to the safety hazards. MOTION: Commissioner Connerton moved that the Public/Traffic Safety Commission set aside staff's recommendation, approving the left-turn access. Chairwoman Edwards seconded the motion for discussion purposes. (Ultimately this motion failed; see page 9.) Commissioner Coe noted the following: acknowledged that a development that began ten years ago should anticipate changes due to growth in the City, relayed a concern that full disclosure be relayed to the future property owners regarding the access restrictions, and advised that since the street was not as busy as it will be, he would be inclined to support rescinding the left-turn access restrictions, acknowledging that a median would be installed at a future point. Commenting on Commissioner Coe's remarks, Commissioner Connerton relayed that the Public/Traffic Safety Commission did not need to be concerned with the disclosure issue for potential future buyers, noting that it was regulated by other standards, relaying that it had been relayed that there would be disclosure; advised that the developer should have been apprised of the restricted access issue at an earlier date so as to have had an opportunity to plan access from another area, concurring with the applicant that it was not equitable for the City to determine that access be restricted at this point in time when the access issue could have been addressed much earlier. For clarification, Director of Public Works Hughes relayed that there was no requirement in this City or any other city for the COA's on a parcel map to identify that a parcel will have restricted movements; advised that the City holds all jurisdiction with respect to determining the right-of-way on the roadways, clarifying that the City could elect to restrict any driveway in the City to right turns in and out at the City's discretion if it was determined by staff to be in the best interest of the public; provided additional information regarding the future median on Ynez Road; clarified that the 1999 approval for this application addressed curb and gutter and construction issues with regard to the shoulder improvements and did not address the striping plan for Ynez Road, noting that there was no approved plan that has been changed; advised that the first striping plan that came to the City and went through review for signature and subsequently was implemented was the plan that restricted the left-turn access which is when the applicant protested the restricted access; with respect to Mr. Meyler's comments that this restricted access was based on opinion, clarified that this determination was not a personal opinion, but a professional opinion based on engineering expertise; acknowledged that while the applicant most likely had hopes and anticipated the permitting of left turn access, that the City did not approve this striping plan until December of last year when the access issue was addressed. For Commissioner Connerton, Director of Public Works Hughes confirmed that to the best of his knowledge the restricted access issue was not addressed with the developer during the original approval process; and confirmed that the Marie Callender's use was notified in their approval process that their left-turn access would be temporary. While advising that staff did not base their determinations on personal opinion but on safety issues related to engineering expertise, Commissioner Connerton noted that fairness to the applicant needed to be balanced with the safety aspects of this matter; relayed that he had visited the parcel numerous times, noting that safety did not appear to be a significant impact at this point in time; in light of the applicant not being noticed of the restricted access until the plans had been approved and recorded, opined that it was R:ltrafficminutes~121400 7 not equitable to restrict the access at this point when there was no opportunity to develop access to another area, advising that the applicant should be granted left-turn access at this time, noting that at a future point if a median is constructed then the access would be restricted at that time. In response to Commissioner Connerton's comments, Director of Public Works Hughes clarified that restricting access does not require any type of public hearing, advising that the jurisdiction for controlling the streets lies with the City Engineer's position; noted that the only situation that would require a public meeting would be in the event that a party chose to appeal the decision; advised that modifications to striping plans are conducted daily without any type of public notice, noting that while not mandated to do so, that if there was a change in a condition, the City does contact property owners that would be effected by changes in access; clarified that the action approved in 1991 was for a tentative map approval, noting that a tentative map does not typically have physical improvements involved with it and would not usually have street improvement or striping plans associated with it; noted that the subsequent dates referenced by Mr. Markham were solely extensions of a tentative map approval; acknowledged that there was concern regarding fair play, noting that while this was not an opportune situation for the developer due to the expectation of having left-turn access, that in order to best address the safety issues staff has recommended restricting access which would ultimately be restricted at a future point with the construction of the median, relaying that at that future point in time the homeowners may voice their complaints regarding the restricted access (if access is permitted until then) due to buying a parcel with access and then having the access restricted; provided additional information regarding the safety hazards associated with turning movements from side streets going across striped dedicated left- turn pockets, clarifying that this particular issue was involving three parcels which would have restricted access now or at some time in the future, advising that in his opinion it would be more prudent to restrict the access at this time. Imploring the Public/Traffic Safety Commission to solely consider the safety issues, Senior Engineer Moghadam advised that this was not the forum for fairness issues, clarifying that since staff's signature would be placed on this access restriction or allowance, that safety should be the consideration of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission. Commenting on the temporary allowance of left-turn access at Marie Callender's, Commissioner Coe advised that this issue was significantly different due to this restriction of access providing inconvenience to three parcels; while noting that the three lots would be impacted negatively with this restriction, relayed that it was an opportunity for the City to be proactive with respect to safety, concurring with Director of Public Works Hughes' comments that if the access is not restricted now, when the median is constructed there will be three homeowners raising the issues of permitting access, whereas at this point the parcels will be sold with full knowledge of restricted access; with respect to the fairness issue, queried whether it was fairer to restrict the access now prior to the parcels being sold or at a future point when there were homeowners who bought with permitted access and would then be restricted when the median was built, relaying that after fudher consideration, he was leaning towards supporting staffs recommendation. For clarification, Minute Clerk Hansen read back the motion for the Public/Traffic Safety Commission. (See page 7 of the minutes.) At this time voice vote was taken reflecting denial of the motion due to Commissioners Coe, Katan, and Lanier voting no. MOTION: Commissioner Coe moved to approve staff's recommendation to deny the request to rescind left-turn access restrictions at the intersection of Ynez Road and Saric Court. Commissioner Katan seconded the motion and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Commissioner Connerton and Chairwoman Edwards who voted no. 3. Proposed Drop-Off Facility - Margarita Middle School RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommend the approval of the proposed drop-off facility and circulation changes at Margarita Middle School. Referencing Exhibit B (per agenda material), Senior Engineer Moghadam provided the staff report, noting the current access points to Margarita Middle School which consisted of two driveways (an entrance, and an exit driveway) denoted on the left side of the map (Exhibit B); relayed that the School District was proposing a third driveway (denoted on the right side of the exhibit) to the south of the existing driveways for the purpose of getting the school buses and parent vehicles off of Margarita Road and onto the school site for drop-offs and pick-ups; noted that staff was not opposed to the proposal, relaying that staff had suggested changing the direction of flow, but that the School District had indicated that they would prefer the passenger side of the vehicles be towards the buildings; advised that this item did not require any City Council or Public/Traffic Safety Commission action, but was presented for informational purposes and for the Commission to provide comments; and relayed that the School District was attempting to cooperate with the City with respect to changes in site plans or the addition of driveways, providing the City an opportunity to comment. For Commissioner Connerton, Senior Engineer Moghadam noted that the driveway allowing left-turns was located approximately 800 feet from the signal, specifying the location of the proposed driveway, noting that the School District will submit a striping plan which could be brought back before the Public/Traffic Safety Commission, if that was the Commission's desire. Commissioner Katan advised that the permitted left-turn movements created an unproductive situation, noting that it was discussed at a previous meeting approximately eight months ago, relaying that restricting the left-turning movements out of the school would aid in the current disruption of the flow of traffic, advising that this would be a good opportunity to provide the School District with the recommendation to restrict the left-turn out movements. Commissioner Coe concurred with Commissioner Katan's recommendation. In light of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission comments, Senior Engineer Moghadam advised that staff would forward this recommendation to the School District, relaying that while passenger cars would be able to make a U-turn at Avenida Barca, the large school buses may have difficulty maneuvering the U-turn. In response to Senior Engineer Moghadam's comments, Commissioner Coe queried whether an exception could be made for the school buses. Commissioner Katan advised that the school buses would not be effected by the restriction, noting that their driving pattern was to travel straight. Commissioner Lanier commented that the buses most likely made the majority of their turns right turns for safety purposes. Senior Engineer Moghadam noted that he would forward the Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommendation to the School District, specifically to restrict the left-turn movements out at the last driveway. MOTION: Commissioner Connerton moved to recommend that the School District restrict left-turning movements out of the western driveway proximate to Avenida Barca at Margarita Middle School. Commissioner Katan seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. 4. Mar.qarita Road Left-Turn Refu.qe/Acceleration Lane RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommend the installation of leff-turn refuge/acceleration lane on Margarita Road at Via La Vida and Avenida Sonoma. Senior Engineer Moghadam provided a brief overview of the staff report (of record), noting that Mayor Comerchero had requested that the intersections of Margarita Road between Solana Way and Rancho California Road be investigated as to avenues to improve the ingress and egress from the side streets, specifically the streets without traffic controls; advised that a survey was conducted, noting that most of the intersections had a left-turn pocket or a center left-turn lane which could be legally used as a refuge area entering into the median portion, relaying that there were two locations where it was not legally allowable to get into the left-turn pocket (due to the median termination) to make a left turn without having to deal with both sides of traffic at the same time; noted staff's recommendation to change the striping at these two locations (at Margarita RoadNia La Vida and Margarita Road/Avenida Sonoma) to provide a left- turn refuge/acceleration lane. MOTION: Commissioner Coe moved to approve staff's recommendation. Commissioner Connerton seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. TRAFFIC ENGINEER'S REPORT A For informational purposes, Senior Engineer Moghadam noted that the Public/Traffic Safety Commission had been provided with a copy of the timing of the school flashing beacons, as provided by the school principals; requested the Public/Traffic Safety Commission to let staff know if there were any inconsistencies, noting that Signal Technician Brown had been checking these times on a regular basis; for Commissioner Coe confirmed that the City provided the beacon lights for Linfield School which was a private school; and noted that R:\tmfficminutes~l 21400 1 0 staff could add on the schedule installation of beacon lights for the private schools located on Santiago Road, noting that the City would be installing beacon lights at the schools in Vail Ranch; and for Chairwoman Edwards, relayed that the three schools located in the Santiago Road area could be notified of the installation. With respect to the item the Public/Traffic Safety Commission brought forward regarding the signs displaying speeds in school zones, Senior Engineer Moghadam relayed that staff is working with the manufacturer in order to schedule a demonstration of the signage for the Public/Traffic Safety Commission, noting that this item would be agendized for a future meeting. POLICE CHIEF'S REPORT For informational purposes, Police Sergeant DiMaggio relayed that on March 23, 2001 the Police Department would be scheduling a DUI checkpoint which would be conducted on Old Town Front Street, south of Santiago Road, at 7:00 P.M., inviting the Public/Traffic Safety Commissioners to attend; for Chairwoman Edwards, confirmed that the Police Department would be focusing on red light enforcement in conjunction with the DUI checkpoint, advising that the Police Department was in the process of working on the Stop Red Light Abuse Program (SLAP) at this time; and for Commissioner Connerton, noted that the program would be initiated in approximately two weeks. FIRE CHIEF'S REPORT No comments. COMMISSION REPORTS A. Per comments from a citizen relayed to him, Commissioner Katan noted that at the intersection coming out of Roripaugh Hills to Winchester Road the wait at the signal was up to six minutes even when there was no traffic, noting that the resident was experiencing this wait at approximately 6:00 A.M. In response, Senior Engineer Moghadam relayed that the City had a good relationship with Caltrans, noting that the timing at this signal would be investigated. In light of the School District announcing that they would be charging for bussing, Commissioner Katan requested that the City investigate providing a grant (as long as the ridership level was 90%) in order to offset the costs incurred, noting that if this issue was not addressed the Public/Traffic Safety Commission would soon have issues coming forward regarding neighborhood residents being impacted by school traffic, advising that generally when schools begin charging for bussing, ridership decreases by 25%; requested that the City investigate an avenue to offset the costs that the School District anticipates, relaying that it would aid in getting the children off to school safer; and relayed that with additional school bussing, the distance of the radius of the circles which qualify children to ride a school bus (due to the distance from their home to the school) could be decreased. R:'~rafficmJn u t es~121400 1 1 Chairwoman Edwards suggested having the Transportation Subcommittee investigate the issue of having the City assist the School District with school bus transportation. Commissioner Coe recommended that former Councilman Lindemans be contacted regarding this matter in order to get his input. In response to Commissioner Coe, Director of Public Works Hughes relayed that the sound walls on Pala Road were part of the Pala Bridge Project, a mandated mitigation requirement, noting that they were constructed under a City- administered contract; and advised that there would be some landscape and irrigation replacement in this area, confirming that the restoration landscape plan was being coordinated with the HOA in the area. With respect to the signal which turns into the K-mart Center, Commissioner Connerton noted that on a regular basis the traffic stacks up beyond the stacking lanes, relaying that the timing of the signal appears to be off, specifying that on Monday, March 19th at 9:00 A.M. when there was no opposing traffic for a period of 45 seconds the left-turn arrow did not change; additionally noted that at Margarita RoadNVinchester Road on the same morning the west left turning lane signal was green long enough to allow two cars to go through, relaying that subsequently nine additional cars went through on a red light. In response, Senior Engineer Moghadam noted that staff would investigate the signal timing. Commissioner Lanier relayed thanks to Mr. and Mrs. Ward for their attendance at this meeting. Noting that he had forwarded a citizen's recommendation to Senior Engineer Moghadam, Commissioner Lanier commended staff for the implementation of the striping in front of Temecula Valley High School. Commenting on the City's website, Commissioner Lanier commended Web Analyst Comerchero for the inclusion of the Driving Tips on the website. For Chairwoman Edwards, Police Sergeant DiMaggio confirmed that the Traffic Calming Program had been initiated in the Muirfield Drive area, providing an update. In response to Chairwoman Edwards' queries, Director of Public Works Hughes relayed that staff needed additional data prior to initiating the Drive 25, Keep Kids Alive Program. Police Sergeant DiMaggio noted that he had contact phone numbers and e-mail information for the representatives from the City of Oceanside's program. Director of Public Works Hughes advised that staff would work with Police Sergeant DiMaggio to obtain the additional information needed. Chairwoman Edwards noted that the North General Kearny residents had been told that their neighborhood would be utilized to initiate the program. R:~trafficminutes\121400 12 For Chairwoman Edwards, Associate Engineer Gonzales relayed that the City would be conducting traffic counts in the surrounding neighborhoods after Meadows Parkway had been open for a duration of time, specifying that the study could begin in April. ADJOURNMENT At 8:12 P.M. Chairwoman Edwards formally adjourned this meeting to Thursday, April 26, 200'1 at 6:00 P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula. Chairwoman Maryann Edwards Administrative Secretary Anita Pyle MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION APRIL 26, 2001 CALL TO ORDER The City of Temecula Public/Traffic Safety Commission convened in a regular meeting at 6:00 P.M., on Thursday, April 26, 2001, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. FLAG SALUTE The audience was led in the Flag salute by Commissioner Lanier. ROLLCALL Present: Commissioners Coe, Connerton, Katan, Lanier, and Chairwoman Edwards. Absent: None. Also Present: Director of Public Works Hughes, Senior Engineer Moghadam, Associate Engineer Gonzalez, Community Service Officer Fanene, Police Officer Nelson, Administrative Secretary Pyle, and Minute Clerk Hansen. PRESENTATIONS Temecula Police Department Presentation regardin.q the Storefront Operations\Community Services Officer Lynn Fanene Providing an overview of the Temecula Police Department's Storefront Operations, Community Service Officer Fanene noted that the first Storefront Operation opened in April of 1997 at the Target Shopping Center, and that two years later the second storefront was opened in Old Town; relayed that the hours of operation are from 9:00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M., Monday through Friday, advising that each storefront was staffed with a Community Service Officer and a part-time employee from the Riverside Office of Aging; apprised the Public/Traffic Safety Commission of the various services and functions of the storefronts, as follows: walk-in reports ara taken (i.e., stolen property, loss of a juvenile), tickets are signed off (i.e., broken headlight citations), RV permits are issued, solicitor's permits are issued, juvenile counseling is provided, fingerprinting is provided, ride-along applications are processed, and crime prevention and Neighborhood Watch information is provided; offering the following statistics noted that in the year 2000 the Temecula storefronts served 3,239 customers, took 466 reports, fingerprinted 998 customers, issued 40 solicitor permits, collected 163 VICR and Repossession fees, issued 101 RV permits, and signed-off 104 citations; and R:\t r affi crninut est'42601 I anticipating the annexation of Vail Ranch, relayed that the Police Department is seeking a third storefront to be located in the vicinity of Highway 79(South)/Margarita Road. Commissioner Coe relayed that he was pleased to be informed regarding the future 3~d storefront operation. Temecula Fire Department Presentation re.qardin.q County Emerqency Medical Services Public Access Defibrillation (PAD) Proqram County Emerqency Medical Service Officer Myron Relaying that recently Councilman Naggar requested staff to investigate the Public Access Defibrillation (PAD) Program, City Fire Chief Howard Windsor advised that this program has caught attention nationwide, noting that at this time the program was in the testing phase in the County of Riverside, relaying that users would be sought to be a party to the program in order for the benefits of the program to be further investigated; and introduced Ms. Myron, from County Emergency Medical Services who runs this program and would provide additional information to the Public/Traffic Safety Commission. Advising that cardiac arrest and cardiovascular disease are the Number One killers in the Unites States (i.e., killing 1 million people a year), Ms. Myron relayed that half of those individuals died suddenly and did not make it to a hospital emergency room; noted the goal to aid in increasing the survivability rates; advised that the PAD Program was an international program funded by the National Institute of Health, relaying that there is no charge for participants; noted that Riverside was the largest county involved in the program, relaying that the program would be implemented in 40 areas; clarified that it was designed to enable a layperson to better affect survivability rates in out-of-hospital cardiac arrests; specified the details of the operation of the Automatic External Defibrillator (AED) which delivers an electrical shock, advising that each minute that passes after an individual collapses there is a ten percent (10%) increase in mortality, noting the goal to provide the equipment to lay responders (i.e., the public) in order to affect an increase in survivability which will be studied; provided data to the Public/Traffic Safety Commission regarding how the equipment works, as well as letters of support from various agencies, the American Heart Association Guidelines, and other information; relayed the provision of free training and face masks; demonstrated how the equipment works, noting the simple operation which provides audio instructions aloud for the responder; advised that the study has revealed a great increase in survivability, which rose from one percent (1%) to approximately seventy-five percent (75%); and clarified that the study was being conducted to evaluate the effectiveness when utilized by laypersons. City Fire Chief Windsor relayed the intent to provide this equipment to high assembly occupancies (i.e., Guidant, the Mall, the Senior Center, the CRC, and City Hall.) Commissioner Connerton advised that this was an excellent program, relaying hopes of success, In response to Commissioner Coe, Ms. Myron relayed that at a future point in time this equipment could potentially be made available for households, while noting the high costs and training involved. At this time Chairwoman Edwards invited Councilman Pratt to come forward to the podium in order for the Public/Traffic Safety Commission and the audience to sing Happy Birthday in celebration of his 82nd birthday which was today. PUBLIC COMMENTS No comments. COMMISSION CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Minutes of Februa~ 22, 2001 RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the Minutes of February 22, 2001. MOTION: Commissioner Connerton moved to approve Consent Calendar Item No. 1. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Lanier and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Commissioner Katan who abstained. COMMISSION BUSINESS 2. NeiRhborhood Traffic Calminq Pro.qram - Muirfield Drive RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission implement Stage 1 of the Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program, which may include establishing a date to hold a workshop/meeting with the Muirfield Drive area residents. Commissioner Coe advised that he would be abstaining with regard to this item. Noting the request received at the March 22, 2001 meeting to study the feasibility of installing traffic control devices to reduce the speed of traveling vehicles on Muirfield Drive (west of Pala Road), Senior Engineer Moghadam provided the staff report (of record); relayed staff's observations in the area, as follows: Muirfield Drive was a relatively short residential collector, the posted speed limit was 25 MPH, and the speeds and volumes appeared to be normal based on the characteristics of the street; clarified that no traffic control devices (i.e., stop signs, or speed undulations) appeared to be warranted to control the perceived speeding or volume impacts; and that based on those observations staff's recommendation was for the Public/Traffic Safety Commission to direct the Police Department to implement Stage 1 of the Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program (NTCP) which would include placement of the radar trailer, continued enforcement of the existing speed limits, and there could be consideration to install signage indicating the fine for a speed violation. In response to Commissioner Lanier, Officer Nelson relayed that the Neighborhood Officer has been spending additional time in this neighborhood, noting that today during R:~afficrnin u t es~042601 3 a 45-minute period there had been no violators; and advised that the speed trailers have been placed in this area. Mr. Warren Knox, 44885 Muirfield Drive, relayed thanks to the Public/Traffic Safety Commission for consideration of his previous request, noting gratitude specifically for the placement of the radar trailers and the increased enforcement, advising that he sited a difference in driving patterns with the Police presence and the radar trailers; confirmed that the traffic in this neighborhood was normal ninety-five percent (95%) of the time, clarifying that when there was a special activity at the park, or on a Saturday in the late evening there would be unusual volumes and speeds of vehicles, noting that this created a hazard due to children playing in an area which was typically safe; specified that he had a petition (which was submitted to staff) representing 23 signatures of the 24 residents contacted out of the 35 total residents residing on this street who supported the implementation of Phase 1 and 2 of the NTCP, advising that the neighbors expressed appreciation for the Police presence and the radar trailer; and reiterated gratitude for the Public/Traffic Safety Commission's efforts. For Commissioner Connerton, Mr. Knox specified that the petition denoted the support of implementation of Phase 1 and 2 of the NTCP on Muirfield Drive. In response to Chairwoman Edwards, Senior Engineer Moghadam confirmed that this was a City street. Commissioner Connerton, echoed by Commissioner Katan, Commissioner Lanier, and Chairwoman Edwards, noted his support of implementing Stage 1 of the NTCP. MOTION: Commissioner Connerton moved to approve staff's recommendation. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Lanier and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Commissioner Coe who abstained. 3. Request for Multi-Way Stop Siqn - Promenade Chardonnay Hills RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission deny the request for installation of Multi-Way Stop Signs on Promenade Chardonnay Hills and recommend implementation of Stage 1 of the Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program. Commissioner Lanier advised that he would be abstaining from this item. Via overhead maps and statistical data, Senior Engineer Moghadam presented the staff report (via agenda material), noting the residential concern regarding speeds and volumes on Promenade Chardonnay Hills; relayed that this street was a 44-foot residential collector, providing access to several residential dwelling units; and specified the area where the volume count data was collected, noting that after the opening of Meadows Parkway the volumes have decreased substantially in this area per the data collected prior to, and after, the opening of Meadows Parkway. Apprising the Public/Traffic Safety Commission and the community residents, Associate Engineer Gonzales presented the comparison data regarding the before and after volumes in this neighborhood associated with the opening of Meadows Parkway which revealed that some of the traffic is being diverted to Meadows Parkway. Based on the number of dwelling units in this neighborhood, Senior Engineer Moghadam relayed that the volumes are reasonable, clarifying that there is no evidence of substantial cut-through traffic; advised that the speed limits are not posted, relaying that while some segments have not been accepted as City streets, if it was the Public/Traffic Safety Commission's desire, speed limit signs could be installed; additiohally noted that speed surveys were conducted, noting that the 85th percentile of speeds' traveled were approximately 32 MPH; clarified that stop signs have been ineffective wh~en installed in other similar locations, providing additional information; with respect to the installation of speed undulations, relayed that certain criteria has to be met prior to this installation, advising that this area does not warrant the installation of speed undulations, noting that due to the configuration of the roadway this installation could be dangerous; based on the data, reiterated that the warrants had not been met for installation of.either speed undulations, or stop signs; and relayed that staff was recommending continued police enforcement, use of the radar trailer, and if the HOA had the means to distribute a letter to all the residents indicating the need to observe the speed limits, this ~ould also be encouraged, Associate Engineer Gonzales relaying the other recommen'dations which were to post the 25 MPH speed limit signs where appropriate, and to place signage posting fines. In response to Commissioner Connerton, Officer Nelson noted that the Neighborhood Officer had been working in the Promenade Chardonnay Hills area, as Well as on Meadows Parkway, issuing citations; and queried staff as to whether promenade Chardonnay Hills was a dedicated street at this time, noting the impacts.associated with issuing radar citations on areas that were not dedicated, clarifying that the citations were not valid. Senior Engineer Moghadam relayed that to the best of his knowledge segments of Promenade Chardonnay Hills were still not dedicated; advised that if the Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommends installation of the 25 MPH speed limit signs in the areas where there are homes fronting Promenade Chardonnay Hills, then that would establish a prima facie speed limit which would be enforceable, relaying that it was his understanding (based on reading the Vehicle Code) that the lack of having streets accepted for maintenance would not restrict the enforcement of the prima facie speed limits, advising that staff would investigate; and for Chairwoman Edward~, confirmed that the 25 MPH speed limit (in areas with homes fronting Promenade Chardonnay Hills) was based on the 85th percentile of vehicle speeds in this area. Officer Nelson recommended posting the 25 MPH speed limit signage in the areas where the criteria is met, and posting end of 25 MPH zone signage in th~ areas where it was not met. Senior Engineer Moghadam relayed that in lieu of the end bf25 MPH speed limit zone signage, signage could be placed representing the speed limit legally justified for that portion of roadway which would be 35 MPH on portions of this street; and confirmed that if the analysis does not justify the posted speed limits, tickets could be dismissed. Commissioner Coe suggested that the placement of 25-MPH speed limi! signage in the areas where it was justified might effectively aid in slowing the speeds oh the other segments of this roadway. For Chairwoman Edwards, Senior Engineer Moghadam clarified that it was not necessary to place signage stating end of 25 MPH zone, advising that signage denoting the appropriate speed limit for that segment could installed; for Commissioner Coe, relayed that it would not be illegal to solely place the 25 MPH signage where appropriate and not signage where that speed limit was not justified; in response to Commissioner Katan, confirmed that the intersections in this area did not meet the criteria for installation of stop signs, even prior to the opening of Meadows Parkway; and for Commissioner Coe, advised that the traffic count data is now being collected over a 7- day period, advising that the locations and days of the week for this particular before and after study were identical. The following individuals relayed their concerns regarding the volumes and speeds of vehicles on Promenade Chardonnay Hills: Mr. Joe LaMarca Mr. Donald Smith [] Ms. Patricia French [] Ms. Cori Cocca [] Mr. Alex Cocca (child) 41138 Promenade Chardonnay Hills 41209 Promenade Chardonnay Hills 41215 Promenade Chardonnay Hills 41132 Promenade Chardonnay Hills 41132 Promenade Chardonnay Hills The above-mentioned individuals relayed the following comments regarding their concerns: Disagreed with staff's comments, specifically with respect to the significant reduction in volumes after the opening of Meadows Parkway. Noted the need for stop signs at the school bus pick-up spots (i.e., Promenade Chardonnay Hills/Chemin Clinet, and Promenade Chardonnay Hills/Chemin Margaux) for safety reasons, relaying that recently there was an auto accident at one of these intersections. Relayed concern regarding the curvature of the road, specifically at the corner of Chemin La Tache, creating a blind spot for the residents' view of the approaching vehicles. Advised that citations have been issued to speed violators in this area. With respect to the installation of stop signs, noted that the majority of the residents would be in favor of the installation. · Promenade Chardonnay Hills was utilized for cut-through traffic. Additional homes and the future church use being developed will worsen the traffic impacts. Queried why the speed limits were based on the 85th percentile of speeds driven rather than mandating the safest speed. Relayed tide noise impacts due to the high speeds and volumes of vehicles. R:~t raffi cminut es~042601 6 · While noting the effectiveness of Police presence, advised that the radar trailers were completely ineffective. · Relayed the difficulties for the residents to access the street from their driveways. · Concurred with posting the 25-MPH speed limit signs. Noted hopes of this matter being resolved prior to an individual being injured due to the safety issues at hand. Advised that it was hazardous for children to play in their own front yards, and for residents to access their mailboxes, specifically proximate to the blind curves in the roadway. Offered to collect signatures from all the neighbors outlining the overwhelming support for the installation of stop signs. For Commissioner Connerton and Commissioner Coe, Mr. LaMarca noted that he was opposed to staff comments due to the following: relayed that the majority of the residents would be in favor of the placement of stop signs, and that a 20% reduction in volumes was not significant in his opinion, advising that a significant reduction would be a reduction over 50%; and reiterated his concern regarding the development of additional homes, and a future church with a 725 car parking lot which would further impact traffic in this area. In response to Mr. LaMarca's comments, Senior Engineer Moghadam relayed that the future church use was required to conduct a traffic study, noting that less than 100 vehicles (on Sunday) were anticipated to travel through Promenade Chardonnay Hills, advising that their direct access is Butterfield Stage Road; relayed that on Heitz Lane there was a reduction in volumes of almost 50% after the opening of Meadows Parkway; with respect to safety issues regarding the children at the school bus stops, advised that the school buses' red flashing lights require vehicles to stop at the location of the bus stop; noted that neighboring developments utilizing Promenade Chardonnay Hills, as designed to do so, were not considered cut-through traffic, even if the tract was part of another subdivision, relaying that the volumes in this area were not high. In response, Mr. LaMarca advised that stop signs installed on Promenade Chardonnay Hills would impro,(e safety and the quality of life in the neighborhood. Clarifying that legislature established the standards for setting speed limits, for Mr. Smith, Senior Engineer Moghadam provided the rationale for determining the speed limit which was based on the approximate 85th percentile of speeds traveled (per the Vehicle Code); relayed the specific criteria warranting a 25 MPH prima facie speed limit; provided additional information regarding the studies conducted, reiterating that if the speed limits were not justified (per the criteria regulations) the citations could be dismissed; and concurred with Mr. Smith, noting that certain segments of the road could be posted at 25 MPH. Concluding his comments, Mr. Smith relayed that rather than commenting on how individuals do not stop at stop signs and providing this fact as part of the rationale for not installing the control devices, that the City should focus on enforcement. For Ms. Cocca, Chairwoman Edwards provided assurance that Butterfield Stage Road would go through in the very near future, potentially in two years; and noted that the future church use's application was not active at this time. In response to the residents' comments, Commissioner Connerton relayed that if an area is posted improperly (regarding speed limits) the citations can be dismissed; with respect to stop signs, noted the recent temporary installation of stop signs in the Via Cordoba area in an attempt to control speed, clarifying that the studies have proven that this control device is completely ineffective in controlling speed, additional noting the ineffectiveness of the stop signs placed on Calle Medusa; and advised that there has been great success with the NTCP, noting that Stage 1 of this program will be very effective in this area. Concurring with staffs recommendation, and Commissioner Connerton's comments, Commissioner Katan reiterated the past effectiveness of implementing the NTCP, advising that, additionally, implementation of the Stage 2 Keep Kids Alive, Drive 25 Program at a future point would be successful. Empathizing with the residents' concerns, Commissioner Coe provided a brief history of other neighborhoods with similar issues regarding the perception of vehicles speeding through their neighborhood; advised that he drove through this neighborhood 10 times since receiving the agenda material, noting that while a few individuals may be using this area as a cut-through, it would not be the easiest access route; recommended that children play in the parks, advising that allowing a child to play near a busy street would be placing the child in jeopardy, noting that at his own home, his son's friends come down to his home to play due to the cul-de-sac being safer; relayed that as the City grows, residents should anticipate increases in traffic; and noted that he would support solely placing the 25 MPH speed limit signage, where appropriate, advising that it may slow speeds in other segments of the road. In response to the Commission's comments, Mr. Robert House, resident of Promenade Chardonnay Hills, residing on Placer Belair, clarified that these residents did not knowingly purchase a home on a busy street; relayed that the residents were shown maps with Meadows Parkway and Butterfield Stage Road going through which would prevent cut-through traffic in their neighborhood; noted that if the City does not approve the Roripaugh Hills Project, Butterfield Stage Road will not be opened; provided additional information regarding the future church use's access plans; and with respect to the speed trailer placed on Promenade Chardonnay Hills, advised that the speeds were not being displayed during four of the days the unit was out there. Noting that she lived on a street in Temecula where the speed limit was 60 MPH, Chairwoman Edwards advised that she did not allow her children to play in the front yard; noted her strong support of solely posting the 25 MPH speed limit signs; relayed the typical volumes in this neighborhood, noting that at this time the existing volumes were far below the anticipated volumes based on the number of residential dwellings in this area; provided additional information regarding the tract configuration, designed for the side streets to utilize Promenade Chardonnay Hills for access; and clarified that if stop signs were effective, she would support placing the device in every neighborhood. R:\t r affic~ninut e s\042601 8 MOTION: Commissioner Connerton moved to approve staff's recommendation which was to deny the request for the multi-way stop signs on Promenade Chardonnay Hills at the requested locations, and to recommend the implementation of Stage 1 of the Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program which includes increased enforcement, the use of a radar trailer, and the installation of speed limit signs; and moved to additionally recommend the installation of signage posting the $181 fine for speeding. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Katan and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Commissioner Lanier who abstained. For the residents' information, Chairwoman Edwards clarified the PublicfTraffic Safety Commission's recommendation regarding this neighborhood. Commissioner Connerton advised Officer Nelson to relay to Police Sergeant DiMaggio the importance of expeditiously increasing enfomement in this area due to the expressed comments from the residents regarding issues of safety. 4. Request for Nei.qhborhood Traffic Calming - Temeku Drive RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission: 1. Recommend that the City Council adopt an Ordinance establishing speed zones on Temeku Drive and Honors Drive; 2. Direct the Police Department to enforce the newly established speed limit including use of the radar speed trailer. Senior Engineer Moghadam presented the staff report (of record), noting that on Temeku Drive there are currently three-four fronting homes, and approximately eleven more to be built, ergo, the 25 MPH prima facie speed limit was not an option; with respect to cut-through traffic, via overheads, relayed that the data revealed that at two of the three locations studied volumes decreased after the opening of Meadows parkway, providing the traffic count data, advising that this area would not be a short cut for vehicles to use as a cut-through, reiterating the definition for cut-through traffic; with respect to speeds in this area, provided a brief history of the area during development, noting that the developer installed signs indicating speed limits, advising that at this point in time those speed limits were unjustified; via overhead statistical data, presented the speed information, concurring with the residents' comments that vehicles are traveling faster than the posted limits (which are not justifiable limits), advising that the justified speed limits would be 40 MPH on a portion of Temeku Hills up to Royal Birkdale Drive, and from this point to Margarita Road a 35 MPH limit would be justified, based on prevailing speeds, accident history, and roadway conditions; clarified that any speed limits posted below those speeds would create difficulties with enforcement; advised that stop signs are not warranted, and that the speed limits, based on the traffic engineering study, should be posted; and noted staff's recommendation, that Stage 1 of the NTCP be implemented. For Commissioner Connerton, Associate Engineer Gonzales specified the portion of Temeku Drive which was not dedicated, noting the portions of Honors Drive that have not been accepted for use by the City, clarifying that neither Honors Drive nor Temeku Drive had been accepted at this time; and confirmed that the Public/Traffic Safety Commission had previously recommended the placement of a stop sign in this area. R:\trafficmin ut es~042601 9 In response to Commissioner Coe, Senior Engineer Moghadam confirmed that the Public/Traffic Safety Commission could make a recommendation for a speed limit on a road that was not dedicated; for Commissioner Katan, noted that it was a better situation if a street was accepted by the City prior to implementing any recommendation, while relaying the City's efforts to aid in ensuring the safety of residents traveling in this area, noting the City's efforts to expedite the acceptance process; and clarified that the stop sign had been installed due to the safety issues at hand. Providing additional information, Chairwoman Edwards noted her discussions with Dr. Wedel regarding the concerns in this neighborhood, noting that she appealed to the City Council and staff for aid in addressing these concerns, noting that since the streets were not dedicated the residents had no other recourse; and relayed a brief history of the development construction in this area. For Commissioner Lanier, Officer Nelson advised that the Police cannot enforce the posted speeds in this area, noting that the citations could be contested due to the lack of supporting analysis, and the streets not being dedicated. In response to Commissioner Coe, Chairwoman Edwards relayed that the Public/Traffic Safety Commission's efforts would be to establish a speed limit tonight, and to discuss recommendations for enforcing that limit. The following individuals relayed their concerns regarding traffic in the Temeku Drive area: Dr. MarkWedel [] Ms. MaryWedel [] Ms. Joanna O'Neill [] Mr. Michael O'Neill [] Mr. James Dent [] Mr. Bill Miner 41522 Temeku Drive 41522 Temeku Drive 41504 Temeku Drive 41504 Temeku Drive 41791 Cascades Court 41832 Cascades Court The above-mentioned individuals noted the following comments regarding the Temeku Drive area: · Relayed that the primary concern was speeding, and not volumes of vehicles. · Noted the traffic impacts generated from the clubhouse. Advised that there was limited visibility (i.e., blind corners) due to the configuration of the street. · Recommended not posting a speed limit higher than 30 MPH. Noted that vehicles were seen traveling at high speeds which created a situation where crossing the street to access mailboxes was unsafe. Relayed a fear that an individual would be hurt on this street if the speeding issue is not addressed. R:\tmffiominut es~042601 10 Queried the setting of a speed limit, advising that the speed violators appear to be accommodated by setting the limits based on the 85th percentile of speeds traveled analysis utilized for setting the speed limits, advising that enfomement should be increased to maintain the current limits. Noted the permitting of golf carts which should contribute to the rationale for a lower speed limit, referencing the Vehicle Code which states that for an area to be designated for golf cart use the speed limit is to be 25 MPH. · Advised that the initial plans were for this area to be a gated community. Recommended that there be a line-of-sight study to reveal the significant negative impacts related to the visibility of approaching vehicles. · Thanked the City for the placement of.the much-needed stop sign. Noted an understanding that Officers could cite individuals traveling at speeds deemed unreasonable and not safe for the conditions existing at that time. · Relayed that when vehicles park in the bicycle lanes, there is no enforcement. Strongly opposed posting a 40-MPH speed limit, noting discussions with the developer. Dr. Wedel provided a PowerPoint presentation, highlighting the applicable law, the Vehicle Code regulations, the City's right to set speeds deemed appropriate, the minimum front yard setbacks due to the initial plan for the community to be gated, the negative visibility impacts, the golf carts use in this area, the previous efforts of the residents, the lack of help to address the issue of speeding, the safety hazards at hand, the opposition to setting the speed limit on Temeku Drive at 40 MPH due to the houses fronting the street, the insignificant reduction in traffic after Meadows Parkway opened (i.e., 2%), the volume study which was conducted on Easter Sunday to compare to previous data, cut-through traffic due to the beauty of the drive and the speed limits not being enforced, and the 4% of vehicles that are adhering to the 30 MPH posted limits; and queried who would benefit by increasing the speed limits. Advising that if the golf carts were permitted to travel in this area, and if the Vehicle Code states that the speed limit can only be 25 MPH with this condition, Commissioner Katan noted his concurrence with the residents, recommending a 25-MPH speed limit. Commissioner Coe relayed that if the streets are not dedicated there should be efforts to expedite the process; and noted concurrence with Commissioner Katan's comments, recommending enforcing a 25-MPH speed limit. For clarification, Director of Public Works Hughes relayed that the City Council may or may not have designated this area as a golf cart community, confirming that the Vehicle Code does require that the posted speed limits should not exceed 25 MPH where golf cads are used; advised that the mere fact that the City designated this area as a golf cart community does not preempt the ability to set enforceable speed limits based on the 85th percentile of speeds traveled; clarified that golf carts should not be permitted on the streets posted above 25 MPH regardless of previous designations, advising that the 25 MPH cannot be enforced simply due to the area being designated as a golf cart street; confirmed, for Chairwoman Edwards, that the 85th percentile data takes precedence over the golf cart designation; and advised that if the City does posts the limits higher than 25 MPH, golf cart travel on the streets should be restricted (per the Vehicle Code standards). Commissioner Coe relayed that he was not so concerned with setting reasonable speed limits which would be technically enforceable, advising that the majority of drivers would not be aware of the required support analysis and would most likely adhere to the limits set. For Commissioner Coe, Director of Public Works Hughes relayed that numerous studies have proven that merely posting a speed limit on a street has almost no effect on what the prevailing speeds will be, advising that people will always drive at a speed they deem comfortable, safe, and reasonable; provided additional information regarding the issues associated with Police Officers citing individuals for speeding while knowing that there was no supporting traffic analysis supporting the limits; reiterated that a City Council designation as a golf cart area cannot preempt the laws in setting speed limits; for Chairwoman Edwards, clarified that the City Council could not continue to allow golf cads in this area and then set the speed limit at 25 MPH, and expect this speed to be enforceable; and relayed that there was the ability to lower the speed limit under 40 MPH if other conditions exist, requesting the Public/Traffic Safety Commission ensure that the Traffic Engineer supports the sefforth special conditions because legally a registered engineer would have to make this determination. Referencing the Vehicle Code, Commissioner Connerton noted that the golf cads could operate in crossings with a speed limit of 45 MPH or below. Chairwoman Edwards, echoed by Commissioner Coe, relayed that in this area the golf carts ~vere operating on the streets. Commissioner Connerton relayed that this situation was not typical, noting that with the 85th pementile of traveled speeds data, the speed limit could be posted at 35-40 MPH, could be reduced to 30 MPH if special conditions exist, querying whether setting speed limits in this range would restrict the use of golf carts. In response to Commissioner Connerton, Senior Engineer Moghadam provided additional information regarding typical drivers travelling at speeds they feel are safe, noting the rationale for the laws being based on setting the limits on the 85th percentile of traveled speeds; and advised that accident history was one of the viable conditions justifying a reduction in the speed limit, clarifying that there was no accident pattern in this area. For Commissioner Lanier, Senior Engineer Moghadam noted that staffs focus was on the safety issues, ergo, the placement of the stop sign in this area; and confirmed that line-of-sight impacts would justify lowering the speed limit. Chairwoman Edwards noted that she appreciated Dr. Wedel's research and time spent regarding this issue; and additionally relayed gratitude to staff for addressing this complicated and unique situation with her. For Chairwoman Edwards, Director of Public Works Hughes relayed that the City was in the process of accepting the streets which could take from a few weeks time to a few months time; noted the goal to place an enforceable speed limit in this area as soon as possible, advising that in the event that the street acceptance takes longer, staff would seek avenues to ensure that the Officers can enforce the justified speed limits; provided additional information regarding the City Council accepting the streets as soon as there is satisfaction that the streets are ready for this acceptance; and confirmed, for Commissioner Connerton, that the PublicFFraffic Safety Commission could move forward as though the streets were accepted, making a recommendation for a posted speed limit. In response to Chairwoman Edwards' queries, Director of Public Works Hughes relayed that the curb heights at a measurement of five or six inches would not be considered a mitigating factor in reducing the speed limits; and in response to querying whether a center line stripe would aid in slowing vehicle speeds, noted' that Senior Engineer Moghadam could make this determination, relaying that at times speeds increased with this striping. Chairwoman Edwards advised that she saw as a mitigating circumstance the fact that the golf carts are, and would continue to be, driven in the streets, which in her opinion should be considered. MOTION: Commissioner Coe moved to recommend an established speed limit of 35 MPH on the entire roadway including Temeku Drive and Honors Drive. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Connerton for discussion purposes. (Ultimately this motion passed; see page 14.) Director of Public Works Hughes noted that this limit would be lower than the 85th percentile of speeds traveled in certain sections, questioning what circumstances and conditions this was based on. Senior Engineer Moghadam noted that this limit (i.e., 35 MPH) could be justified on the sight visibility distance issues; and for Chairwoman Edwards, clarified that it would be difficult to justify a speed limit any lower than 35 MPH, providing additional information regarding the speeds that are typically traveled. In response to Chairwoman Edwards' queries as to whether she was correct in understanding staff's comments, that if the speed limit is posted at 35 MPH, in lieu of the 30 MPH posting at this time, that staff was of the opinion that the speeds traveled would not change, Director of Public Works Hughes noted that after dealing with this issue for over 21 years, that the posting of a speed has had almost no effect, citing an example in the City of Indian Wells where regardless of data and the lack of being able to enforce the limits, the City Council of this City changed the speed limits throughout the City to a posted limit of 25 MPH, noting that after six weeks all the new signage was changed back to the enforceable limits, clarifying that merely posting a speed was not effective. Chairwoman Edwards relayed a preference to post an enforceable speed limit, and to increase enforcement, ensuring that vehicles traveled at that speed. For Chairwoman Edwards, Officer Nelson relayed that if the limits were supported, the citations for violations would be defensible in court, noting that an additional Neighborhood Officer would be coming on board in July; and confirmed, for Commissioner Lanier, that the Officers could issue citations in this area at the limit of 35 MPH. At this time voice vote was taken regarding the motion reflecting unanimous approval. Commissioner Connerton commended Dr. Wedel for his fine presentation, relaying that it had been informative and detailed. Resolution Amending Meeting Schedule of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. PTS 2001-01 A RESOLUTION OF THE PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. PTS 99-01 ESTABLISHING THE FOURTH THURSDAY OF EACH MONTH AS THE REGULAR MEETING SCHEDULE In response to Commissioner Coe's queries, staff relayed that changing the meeting date to the third Thursday would create scheduling problems. .MOTION: Commissioner Coe moved to approve staff's recommendation. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Connerton for discussion purposes. (Ultimately this motion passed; see below.) Noting that he did not support this recommendation in the past due to his opinion that there was much for the Public/Traffic Safety Commission to accomplish, Commissioner Connerton advised that he would not support this recommendation at this time. At this time voice vote was taken reflecting approval with the exception of Commissioner Connerton who voted n._9. TRAFFIC ENGINEER'S REPORT In response to Commissioner Coe's previous queries, Senior Engineer Moghadam noted that in the agenda material staff had only included staff's response to various letters from residents, and not copies of the original letters, advising that in the future staff would include copies of the original letters. Advising that the ClP process has begun, Director of Public Works Hughes noted that the draft CIP would most likely be presented to the Public/Traffic Safety Commission at the May meeting, relaying that the CIP would be presented to the City Council at a workshop approximately one week before presentation to the Public/Traffic Safety Commission. POLICE CHIEF'S REPORT With respect to the residents' comments regarding the radar trailer that was not operating for four days, Officer Nelson noted that the units were sent out to be refurbished which hopefully resolved this problem. FIRE CHIEF'S REPORT No comments. COMMISSION REPORTS A. Commending the Police Department, Commissioner Connerton relayed that at the altercation that took place on March 25th on Rancho California Road, east of the freeway, which involved two drivers physically fighting, that the Police Department handled the situation in a thorough manner. For Commissioner Connerton's comments regarding the traffic impacts on the southbound offramp on the 1-15 to Winchester Road, Director of Public Works Hughes noted that there was a budgeted item to widen the bridge in the creek in order to get the width to provide two offramp lanes at this location; advised that this bridge widening project had been designed and forwarded to Caltrans for plan check, noting that there has been a major setback regarding the ability to proceed with this project; relayed that the City was also working with Caltrans for a new interchange north of Winchester Road, noting the progress of the project, advising that the project study report is anticipated to be approved by Caltrans in July or August; relayed that the new intemhange design would include plans to merge and weave the existing Winchester Road Interchange, advising that the existing structures would conflict with the new structure; clarified that if the bridge would have been constructed, ultimately it would have to taken out for construction of the new ultimate project; noted that since it has been realized that the bridge will not be widened, staff was working with Caltrans in efforts to obtain an additional offramp lane, providing additional information; advised that this project has been made a priority project and there would be efforts to place it on fast-track status; noted that Caltrans was in the process of planning additional signage on the auxiliary lane; in response to Commission queries, noted that the traffic impacts were not caused from the design of the offramp, but from driver behaviors; and relayed that the traffic may be relieved somewhat now that the Murrieta Hot Springs Project was wrapping up. Commissioner Connerton noted the importance of striving to address this traffic issue expeditiously, acknowledging the City's efforts. For informational purposes, Director of Public Works Hughes relayed that the City of Murrieta was going to be closing down traffic on Jefferson Avenue for a two-year period for a project, noting that there would be a detour route; and relayed that the City of Temecula has requested to view the plans for the detour. In response to Commissioner Connerton, Senior Engineer Moghadam relayed that the City has a consultant on board for the Red Light Camera matter, advising that at a future date there would be a presentation to the Public/Traffic Safety Commission. Commissioner Lanier recommended that when a traffic study was conducted in a neighborhood that there be accompanying information for the residents, in order to provide a better understanding of the data. In response to Commissioner Lanier, Officer Nelson provided an overview of the Neighborhood Enforcement, relaying that along that along with the Neighborhood Enforcement Program that in between other calls the Officers will also enforce the areas which have been recommended for additional enforcement, confirming that the Public/Traffic Safety Commission concerns are forwarded to the Officers. With respect to the signage denoting red light fines, For Commissioner Katan, Director of Public Works Hughes noted that the signage would most likely not be placed at all the intersections in the City. For Commissioner Coe, Director of Public Works Hughes relayed that the bridge construction project in the Via Montezuma area would be completed in approximately four weeks, providing additional information regarding the evolvement of this project and the discussions which took place with the Resource Agencies. Thanking the Police Department for their support in the community, Commissioner Coe commended the Police Department. Referencing a newspaper article she distributed to the Public/Traffic Safety Commission, Chairwoman Edwards relayed that the Keep Kids Afive, Drive 25 Program was going to be implemented in the City of Encinitas. Advising that she got to preview the Transportation portion of the City's website designed by Web Analyst Comerchero, Chairwoman Edwards relayed that the data was fantastic; and opined that this segment of the website would most likely be award winning. Chairwoman Edwards noted that she had an opportunity to meet with the Harveston Project representatives, relaying that there would be some wonderful innovative concepts introduced. Acknowledging the City's thorough graffiti removal program, Chairwoman Edwards queried if there was a program to remove the stickers placed on the back of street signs, stop signs, and signals. Director of Public Works Hughes noted that this was considered graffiti and that the City addressed this issue within that program, relaying that it might take longer due to not being noticed as readily as graffiti. Chairwoman Edwards encouraged everyone to attend the 1't Street Bridge Dedication Ceremony on Tuesday morning. Commissioner Coe noted that he and his wife would be attending, relaying that it would be their 25th Wedding Anniversary. R:\tr affic~ninut es~042601 1 6 ADJOURNMENT At 9:12 P.M. Chairwoman Edwards formally adjourned this meeting to Thursday, May 24, 2001 at 6:00 P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula. Chairwoman Maryann Edwards Administrative Secretary Anita Pyle ITEM NO. 2 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: AGENDA REPORT Public/Traffic Safety Commission Ali Moghadam, P.E., Senior Engineer, Traffic May 24, 2001 Item 2 Harveston - Community Mobility Enhancemem Plan (CMEP) RECOMMENDATION: That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission receive and file a report on the Harveston Community Mobility Enhancemem Plan (CMEP). BACKGROUND: Matthew Fagan, representative for Lennar Homes will give a presentation for the Lennar Homes Harveston project CMEP. FISCAL IMPACT: Attachment: Harveston Community Mobility Ehancement Plan 1 r :Xtra [fic\commiss nXagenda~2001 \0524/Harveston agn/ajp Harveston Community Mobility Enhancement Plan (CMEP) This purpose of the Community Mobility Enhancement Plan (CMEP) is to provide a wide array of options for residents of Harveston to move within their Community, as well as the City of Temecula and other surrounding destinations. Focus has been placed on reducing dependency upon the automobile. The goal is to have a safe, efficient system that provides mobility for people of all ages. Enhanced mobility leads to more personal freedom and increased opportunities for social interaction. Potential options may include: a shuttle system, walking, hiking and jogging paths, bike lanes, ridesharing/carpools, vanpools, school pools, walking school buses, commuter services, appropriately situated land uses (employment and services nearby} and enhanced communications amongst the residents. Shuttle Loops (Pdvate and/or Public) The Harveston Depot is located in the Village Center of the community. Convenient, safe and well- landscaped paths are provided for the residents to get to the Village Center. The Depot is envisioned to be a hub of activity within the community. · Potential shuttle destinations could include the following: · Promenade Mall. · Industrial area of City of Temecula & Murrieta. · Adjacent employment areas. · Day Middle School. · Chaparral High School. · Temecula Sports Park/CRC. · Mt. San Jacinto College. · Senior Center/Old Town. · Post Office. · The Loop Road (transport residents to the school, village, lake/lake park and the Community Park). · City of Temecula Community Functions. · 4th of July Parade/Fireworks. · Festival of Lights Parade (December). · Council & Commission meetings. · A special rate for passes should be considered for Harveston residents. · The coordination of resources will be beneficial to utilizing resources in the most efficient manner. The following agencies and programs should work in conjunction with each other: · Local programs: · RTA. · TVUSD. · Smart Shuffle. · Dial-a-ride. · Resources/funding sources to be explored: · State of Califomia. · Federal programs. · Private (non-project). · Private (project). · Local/regional. Specific Plan Figure 3.1 (Land Use Plan). This Plan has been designed with clustered units located in proximity to Harveston Lake/Lake Park and the Village Center. According to RTA, these densities create the "efficiencies" to support a shuffle system. Multiple paths and trails lead to the Harveston Depot in the Village Center. Specific Plan Figure 7.4 (Public Transit Plan). This Plan shows existing RTA routes and stops as well as routes and stops proposed within Harveston. RTA has indicated that the shuffle could sen/e the project initially at the Harveston Depot located in the Villager Center. This component can be marketed to potential buyers. · The program should be promoted with a regular marketing campaign. The mobility of Harveston residents should be made to be fun. In addition, the safety, reliability and convenience of the systems need to be stressed. The following should be encouraged: · Unique shuffle design. · Promotions. · Coupons/discount tickets. · Gifts. · Recognition events. A survey should be conducted when residents move in. Find out where they want to go, how often, etc. and provide the necessary shuttle services to meet their needs. Walking to School Harveston has been designed as a walkable community. Sidewalks, paseos and multi-purpose trails connect all portions of the project. These pathways are well landscaped and vehicular conflicts are reduced to provide safe and convenient routes for walkers. Open-ended cul-de-sacs provide easy access to the Loop Road Paseo and remove potential obstacles to walkers. Pedestrian friendly short cuts are available throughout the project, including paths to the elementary school. Create programs to foster walking to the area schools (Harveston Elementary School and Chaparral High School). · Explore the possibility to provide incentives for the walkers (i.e., tokens, trading cards, and gift certificates from local businesses). Work this into the school's athletic or fitness programs. · The model has been established: '~Nalking School Bus" features from "Street Reclaiming" by David Engwicht. · Create a safe walking environment. · Establish a volunteer program, which is coordinated by Harveston's Lifestyle Maintenance Organization (LMO), that schedules parents, eldedy, etc. to chaperone the children to and from the elementary school. · Coordinate with the TVUSD to make the crossing @ the Santa Gertrudis Creek safe for the students going to and from the high school. A crossing exists at the Margarita Road Bddge and there is an entrance from the Creek to the school site. Trails The mobility of Harveston residents will also be affected by the extent of the on-site and off-site regional trails system. As these develop, the transportation options will be enhanced. Bike trail maps can be obtained on-line. Walking. · Walking path maps can be obtained on-line. · Use calming devices (i.e., signage) to encourage motorists to drive slowly in heavy pedestrian areas. 2 · Special Events. · Harveston Hiking Day. · Fund-raising walk-a-thons. · Trail clean-up day. · Specific Plan. · Figure 4.7: Bicycle Plan. This plan has been developed to provide bike lanes and paths within Harveston and ties into existing and planned bike lanes and paths. · Figure 6.1: Open Space and Recreation Plan. This plan illustrates the open space and recreation components of Harveston. Walking paths are abundant throughout the project and connect key open space and recreation components. · City-wide Trails Plan. This Plan is currently being developed. Harveston will serve as a point of origin and destination for those utilizing the City-wide system. Intemet/Intranet This will foster communication between the Lifestyle Maintenance Organization (LMO) and the residents, as well as communication between the residents. Programs/Information that should be provided: · Carpooling/ridesharing Information. · Utilize the system to coordinate ridesharing efforts between the residents. Provide incentives for ddesharing. · Have a series of coordinators in the community (similar to a block captain for neighborhood watch). Have the coordinators meet regularly to foster communications and brainstorm to make the system better. Vanpools may be coordinated at this time. · Have regularly scheduled social events where potential ddeshare candidates can meet each other. Make these fun and festive events. · Have incentives/parties (perhaps Friday social hour) for those that fideshare 3 or more times within a week. · Schoolpooling Information. Similar to carpooling, but used for coordinating school-aged dders. Emphasis should be placed on trips to Day Middle School, Chaparral High School and Mt. San Jacinto College. · Bike pooling. · Provide. · Maps of bike routes. · Dates and locations for: · Maintenance clinics. · Bike safety clinics. · Bike club meetings. · Use incentives like those provided for carpool/rideshare. · Transit. · Utilize the CPS system that is being developed by RTA to make the shuttle system more efficient to the user. Wire homes with bells or lights to announce that the shuttle will be at the station in 5 minutes. Have interactive kiosks at the transit station and on-line that provides schedules for the shuffle. · Bulletin Boards. These boards can be used for communication between Harveston residents and can be similar to the Community Bulletin Board on Adelphia (Channel 28) or that used at Ladere Ranch (www.ladereranch.com). The Bulletin Boards may identify services, social and employment opportunities, as well as other items that are located within Harveston that could reduce vehicle trips to other portions of the City. · Potential applications include: · Clubs. · Organizations. · Babysitting. · Daycam (in-home). · In-home care. · Employment Opportunities. · Excursions. · Phone numbers and e-mail addresses for businesses that offer home and office deliveries. The cost to the business can be minimal. They can include coupons/discounts on-line or revenue can be used for other subsidies or incentives. · Commuter Services to employment areas outside of Temecula (i.e., San Diego, Los Angeles). Much of this information can be included in a monthly newsletter provided by the LMO. Uses Within the Village Center By encouraging and focusing marketing effo~ on certain types of uses within the Village Center, Citywide mobility is enhanced by reducing trips outside of the project. Potential uses to be rigorously recruited include: · Contract Postal Units. · Cafes. · Day Care. · Religious institutions. · Senior Housing. · Other convenience uses that keep thps within the project. · Specific Plan Section 11.4.5 (Mixed Use Overlay Zone) Permitted/Conditionally Permitted Uses Matrix. Public Education The benefits of these programs need to be expressed and understood by the public. · Benefits include: · Improved mobility. · Transportation options. · Health benefits (exercise). · Air Quality benefits. · Increased time for parents (no need to drive everywhere). · Increased opportunities for social interaction. · Decreased costs for transportation. · Potential options for education include: · Community newsletter. · Bulletin Board. · Local newspaper interest stories. · Schools. · Harveston walk/shuttle days {w/incentives). · Smart growth/livable communities example. Ha ves on May9,2001 Dear Neighbor: Over the next few weeks, the plan for the new hometown of Harveston by Lennar Communities will be presented to our city leaders for review, comment and approval. As part of our on-going effort to involve the residents of Temecula in this process, we invite you to look over the attached Harveston information booklet and learn more about our plans for this new village. We expect that much will be said and written about Harveston in the days to come. We thought you'd appreciate hearing about our plans directly from us. Harveston has been designed as a small walkable village that embraces and protects the exceptional quality of life in Temecula. The plan for Harveston is based on a new approach to community building that rests on four cornerstones including the need to protect Temecula's hometown character, help manage local growth, provide a lake, parklands and open space, as well as foster connectivity. Each of these cornerstones is explained and demonstrated in the attached information booklet. Also included is a village site plan and artists renderings for your use in further understanding our vision for Harveston. We believe that Harveston is unlike any other plan for homes and businesses ever presented to the City of Temecula. As a demonstration of our commitment toward making the vision for Harveston a reality, we've already funded more than $14.4 million in local road and other infrastructure improvements. We've already provided the land for the new Ysabel Barnett Elementary School scheduled to open in Harveston this fall as well as the first of many local parks and recreational facilities. We've already designed Harveston to include two employment areas slated to provide more than 700 jobs. And, we've already begun planning for the next $20.2 million in local and regional roadway construction projects. If, after reviewing this booklet, you still have questions about Harveston, we invite you to call us at the Harveston Hometown Phoneline at either 909-698-0170 or call toll-free at 888-465-8188. In the meantime, welcome to Harveston -- a visionary village that borrows the best of the past for the benefit of the fi~ture. Sincerely, Bill Storm Lennar Communities 6529 Riverside Avenue, Suite 133 ' Riverside, California 92506 · Tel: (909) 774-0789 ' Fax: (909) 774-0790 www. harveston.com ITEM NO. 3 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: AGENDA REPORT Public/Traffic Safety Commission Ali Moghadam, P.E., Senior Engineer, Traffic May 24, 2001 Item 3 Proposed Capital Improvement Program - Fiscal Years 2002-2006 RECOMMENDATION: That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission review and discuss the proposed circulation projects in the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for Fiscal Years 2002-2006. BACKGROUND: Mr. Bill Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer will be presenting the proposed circulation projects in the CIP for the Fiscal Years 2002-2006 to the Public/Traffic Safety Commission for review and discussion. I r :\traffic\commission\agenda\2001\052401 \CIP presentation i ~j,, : : ~ ::-, : :,~ >'~- : :~ ~ ~.~ ~ : : ._~ :_- : : ~ Z -~ ~ ~ ~ c~ :~ "~ ~' , : : ~'-'~ :'~ : : ~ ~: . : ~ .., ~"-- ~: ; --,_ : : : ~ : ~ : ~ ~ :.-'= _: = '~_ ~ i~r~aNnoe ~uo ~ = [ ~ oo I oo m m oo ITEM NO. 4 TRAFFIC ENGINEER'S REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: MEMORANDUM Bill Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Brad Buron, Maintenance Superintendent May 2, 2001 SUBJECT: Monthly Activity Report - April, 2001 The following activities were performed by Public Works Department, Street Maintenance Division in-house personnel for the month of April, 2001: I. SIGNS A. B. C. Total signs replaced Total signs installed Total signs repaired 14 16 10 6 2,905 52 191 442 13 270 II. TREES A. Total trees trimmed for sight distance and street sweeping concerns Ill. ASPHALT REPAIRS A. Total square feet of A. C. repairs B. Total Tons IV. CATCH BASINS A. Total catch basins cleaned RIGHT-OF-WAY WEED ABATEMENT A. Total square footage for right-of-way abatement VI, VII. GRAFFITI REMOVAL A. Total locations B. Total S.F. STENCILING A. 230 New and mpainted legends B. 51,711 L.F. of new and repainted red curb and striping Also, City Maintenance staff responded to 27 service order requests ranging from weed abatement, tree trimming, sign repair, A.C. failures, litter removal, and catch basin cleanings. This is compared to 39 service order requests for the month of April, 2001. The Maintenance Crew has also put in 62 events and response to street emergencies. __ hours of overtime which includes standby time, special The total cost for Street Maintenance performed by Contractors for the month of April, 2001 was ~ 98,477.00 compared to $ 33,227.00 for the month of March, 2001. Account No. 5402 Account No. 5401 Account No. 999-5402 $ 61,462.00 $ 34,915.00 $ 2,100.00 CC: Ron Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works Ali Moghadam, Senior Engineer- (ClP/Traffic) Greg Butler, Senior Engineer (Capital improvements) Amer Attar, Senior Engineer (Capital Improvements) JerryAlegria, Senior Engineer - (Land Development) ITEM NO. 5 POLICE CHIEF'S REPORT APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANCE CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City ManagedCity Council Jim Domenoe, Chief of Police May 22, 2001 Monthly Departmental Report The following report reflects special teams, traffic enforcement and miscellaneous activity occurring during April of 2001. Part One crime statistics are displayed by reporting district within the City, providing stable parameters for monitoring criminal activity, and aiding in planning police resource deployment. The Police Department responded to twenty-nine "priority one" calls for service during the month of April, with an average response time of approximately 6.7 minutes. A total of 3,038 calls for police service were generated in the City of Temecula during the month. During the month of April, the Temecula Police Department's Town Center storefront served a total of 179 customers. Fingerprinting services for this month showed fifty-nine prints taken, twenty- seven people filed police reports, thirteen people had citations signed off and two oversize vehicle permits were issued. Crime Prevention Officer Lynn Fanene padicipated in a number of special events and community oriented programs during the month. He conducted child fingerprinting for a "Mommy and Me" program for pre-school children in Vintage Hills. Officer Fanene conducted four neighborhood watch meetings and conducted fifteen residential security visits and thirty-one business visits during the month. He conducted forty-seven visits to businesses for crime follow-up information. Officer Fanene also worked with our traffic division to assist with the annual "Cross Walk" event. Officer Fanene also completed his article for the Valley Business Journal titled '¥Veapon Safety for Shopkeepers." The POP Team continued to work on the "Crime Free Multi Housing" project although no new complexes were certified. At this time there is 70% compliance with this program across the City. The team continued their 290 PC (Sex Registrant) Program in cooperation with the Murrieta Police Department, which resulted in three felony warrants being served. Monthly Departmental Report Page 2 The team continued their "Crime Free Parks" program and as a result they made contact with eight subjects and issued three citations for drinking in public. The T.A.G. program for the month was held in conjunction with the Crime Free Parks program. The team also worked the continuing "Homeless Assistance" program, which resulted in contacting eight subjects who were offered and refused assistance. One homeless subject was arrested during the month for a misdemeanor offense. Two off-road vehicle enforcement programs were held during the month and resulted in the issuance of two citations and four warnings. The Old Town Storefront serves as an office for the POP team and a location to assist the public with police services. This has greatly increased their availability to serve the Old Town area. This month the Old Town storefront served ninety customers, eleven fingerprints were taken, twenty-one reports were written and three citations were signed off. The traffic team reported that during the month of April there were 571 citations issued for hazardous violations, sixty-six citations were issued for non-hazardous violations and 104 parking citations were issued. Of the 571 hazardous citations issued, 126 were issued for red light violations as part of the newly begun SLAP (Stop Light Abuse Program). There were eleven injury and thirty- eight non-injury traffic collisions reported and thirty-seven drivers were arrested for DUI. The monthly ERACIT program this month led to the arrest of two subjects for DUI. The Neighborhood Enforcement Team (NET) program resulted in 69 citations being issued. This program addresses traffic concerns in residential neighborhoods with a dedicated motor officer. During the month of April, the POP officers assigned to the Promenade Mall handled a total of 184 calls for service. These calls resulted in the criminal arrest and filings on twelve misdemeanors and two felony cases for various offenses. Four citations were also issued. Officers Robles and Rupe provided training to security staff on officer safety and cooperative policing. The mall officers also presented the mall management staff with the inkless check system program. The team also worked with RAID (Riverside Auto theft Interdiction Detail) to assist in the investigation and reduction in the number of vehicle thefts and burglaries at the mall. The school resource officers continue to remain active in their schools. During the past month, the officers conducted numerous presentations in areas such as gateway drugs, forensics, and other topics. They also conducted counseling sessions with students. A total of two arrests were made on TVUSD campuses during the month. The JOLT program (Juvenile Offender Law Enforcement Program) continues to be a success in part through its youth court program. The JOLT officer assisted at other schools with truancy meetings and follow up with parents of juveniles in the JOLT program. Officer Adams facilitated the sixty- fourth youth court session and conducted the sixty-fifth orientation meeting during the month. Officer Adams continued to work with "At Risk" juveniles throughout the month and also conducted counseling sessions with their parents. During the month of April, the Special Enforcement Team of Officers Rich Holder and John Morin handled a total of twenty-five cases. These cases resulted in thirty-two misdemeanor and eighteen felony arrests, primarily for narcotics violations. They also issued twenty-five citations for various violations. This team continues to work street level narcotics and specialty patrol within the city on a pro-active basis. The team also recovered four grams of marijuana, three grams of methamphetamine and fourteen grams of cocaine. Monthly Departmental Report Page 3 Volunteers from the community continue to be an integraJ part of the Temecula Police Department's staff. Under the guidance of volunteer coordinator Gayle Gerrish, the Police Department's volunteer staff contributed 555 hours of service in April. Volunteer assignments include computer data input, logistics support, special event assistance and telephone answering duties. The reserve officer program and mounted posse are additional valuable volunteer resources available to the police department. The police department utilizes reserve officers to assist with patrol, traffic enforcement, crime prevention, off road vehicle enforcement and a variety of special functions. Reserve police officers worked a total of 354 hours during the month (220 hours were specifically spent on patrol in Temecula). The posse contributed 190 hours during the month. ITEM NO. 6 FIRE CHIEF'S REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Howard Windsor, City Fire Chief May 22, 2001 Monthly Departmental Report APPROVAL CITY A']-rORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANCE' CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDATION: Attached for City Council's review and filing is the Fire Department's Monthly Activity Report for the month of April, 2001. Response Statistics for April, 2001 Structure Fire 6 Ringing Alarm Responses Outside of the Civ, TOTAL 3 5 4 67 18 4 5 0 21 N/A 133 8 4 2 20 109 Vegetation Fire 2 1 0 6 30 Vehicle Fire 2 1 2 10 40 Fire - Other 1 2 3 10 52 Medical Aid 64 45 91 267 1052 Traffic Collisions 32 4 17 71 269 Fire Menace Standby 3 1 4 12 46 Public Service 4 8 7 24 88 Ha~nat 0 0 0 0 N/A 33 8 9 71 409 N/A N/A 149 N/A 74 135 N/A 491 N/A 2095 Medic Squad 84 Response Statistics Medic Squad 84 Time Statistics Medical Aids 192 670 Traffic Collisions 24 147 Public Service Assists 5 18 2 5 Fire Menace Standby's Structure Fires Ringing Alarm Vegetation Fire Vehicle Fire 36 19 99 1 3 0 4 Refuse Fire 0 5 Hazmat 1 2 TOTAL 246 989 5.31 min 11 min Average Response Time Longest Response Time Medic Squad Cancelled Prior to Patient Contact 75 Average Wait Time for AMR 3Amin Medic Squad on Scene Prior to AMR - Medical Aids and Traffic Collisions 107 Performed *ALS prior to AMR's Arrival 50 *ALS - Advanced Life Support Medic Squad Comments: · On 7 occasions, the Medic Squad was on scene greater than 10 minutes before the arrival of AMR. · The longest wait for an A_MR unit was 15 minmes. · Medic Squad 84 had 3 response times over 10 minutes. · MS84 was out of service for mechanical repairs a total of 23 days this month, during which time MS84R was in service. Personnel 1 - Battalion Chief/Fire Marshal 3 - Fire Safety Specialist Fire Prevention 1 - Captain/Deputy Fire Marshal 2 - Fire System Inspectors 1 - Office Technician IH Fire Plan Check Statistics Fire Plan Check Building TI Fire Plan Check Building Fire Plan Check Misc. 23 Fire Spray Booth Plan Check Fire Special Suppression Plan Check Fire Alarm Plan Check 7 91 52 24 125 Fire Under Ground Water Plan Check 5 36 Fire Over or Under Ground Tang Plan Check 0 4 Fire Sprinkler NCOM Plan Check 9 39 Fire Sprinkler TI Plan Check 9 30 Fire Hood Duct Plan Check 5 11 0 1 0 7 Planning Case Plan Review 30 0 36 85 Fire Code Permits 0 0 TOTAL 119 510 Fire Prevention (Continued) Fire Inspection Statistics Fire Prevention Final 15 75 Fire Prevention Shell 12 52 Fire-Underground Hydro 4 15 Fire Thrust Block Fire Over Head Hydro Fire Flow Fire Flush Fire Sprinkler Final Fire Weld Inspection Fire Hood Duct Final Fire Pre- Wire Fire Alarm Final Fire Spray Booth Final Fire Safety Inspection Fire State Mandated Inspection Fire Special Events Inspection Fire Piping Hydro Fire Shear Valves Fire Over/Under Tank Final Fire Special Suppression System Fire Special Project Investigations Fire Admini~i~tive - Meetings etc... Fire Misc. Inspections Engine Co. Follow Up Enforcement 6 20 10 39 1 2 4 16 12 43 4 13 0 3 11 19 17 52 1 3 6 41 4 13 5 12 1 1 0 0 2 4 0 1 0 0 0 8 4 9 0 3 TOTAL 119 444