HomeMy WebLinkAbout071492 CC Agenda AGENDA
TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
A REGULAR MEETING , ,
TEMECULA COMMUNITY CENTER - 28816 PUJOL ST
JULY 14, 1992 - 7:00 PM
At approximately 9:45 PM, the City Council will determine which
of the remaining agenda items can be considered and acted upon
prior to 10:00 PM and may continue all other items on which
additional time is required until a future meeting. All meetings
are scheduled to end at 10:00 PM
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. 92-14
Resolution: No. 92-57
CALL TO ORDER:
· Mayor Patricia H. Birdsall presiding
Invocation
Associate Minister John Larkam, World Harvest Outreach
Church
Flag Salute
Councilmember Parks
ROLL CALL:
Lindemans, Moore, Mufioz, Parks, Birdsall
PRESENTATIONS/
PROCLAMATIONS
PUBLIC FORUM
This is a portion of the City Council meeting unique to the City of Temecula.
At the meeting held on the second Tuesday of each month, the City Council
will devote a period of time (not to exceed 30 minutes) for the purpose of
providing the public with an opportunity to discuss topics of interest. The
members of the City Council will respond to questions and may give direction
to City staff. The Council is prohibited, by the provisions of the Brown Act,
from taking any official action on any matter which is not on the agenda. If
you desire to speak on any matter which is not listed on the agenda, a pink
"Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the
City Clerk before the Council gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time
limit for individual speakers.
2/egende/071482 I 07/08/92
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
All matters listed under (~onsent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be
enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless
members of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent
Calendar for separate action.
CONSENT CALENDAR
2
3
4
StandQrd Ordinance Adoption Procedure
RECOMMENDATION
1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions
included in the agenda.
Minute~
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1
2.2
2.3
Approve the minutes of the meeting of June 17, 1992
Approve the minutes of the meeting of June 23, 1992
Approve the minutes of the meeting of June 24, 1992
Resolution ADoroving List of Demands
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 92-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A.
Oitv Treasurer's Report as of May 31, 1992
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Receive and File Report.
2/ageride/071482 2 07/08/g2
7
ResolUtion Establishing Permanent Gann Appropriation Limit and Submittal to the
Voters= at the November 3.1992 General Election
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1 Adopt the following resolutions entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 92-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, GIVING
NOTICE OF THE SUBMISSION TO THE VOTERS OF A QUESTION RELATING
TO THE APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT OF THE CITY, TO BE CONSIDERED AT THE
GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 3,
1992
RESOLUTION NO. 92-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, SETTING
PRIORITIES FOR FILING WRITTEN ARGUMENTS REGARDING A CITY
MEASURE AND DIRECTING THE CITY ATTORNEY TO PREPARE AN
IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS
RESOLUTION NO. 92-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA,
PROVIDING FOR THE FILING OF REBUTTAL ARGUMENTS FOR CITY
MEASURES SUBMITTED AT MUNICIPAL ELECTIONS
ContraCt Aoreement for Street Numbering
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1 Approve a contract agreement with Bruce Stewart to renew existing
contract to provide address numbering services on an as-needed basis.
Award of Contract for Audio-Video Services
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1 Award e Contract to Davlin to provide audio-video services for City
Council and Planning Commission meetings.
21egend~/071492 3 07/08/92
8 Authorization for Bid Proposals - Street StriDing and Legend Painting
RECOMMENDATION:
8.1 Authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit bids for the annual
street striping and street legend painting contract.
9
Authorization for Bid Proposals - Street Name Sions and Traffic Signs
RECOMMENDATION:
9.1 Authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit bids for the
acquisition of street name signs and traffic signs.
10
Releas~ Labor and Material Bonds - Tract No. 23128
RECOMMENDATION:
10.1 Authorize the release of street, water and sewer system materia and
labor bonds in Tract No. 23128,
10.2 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors.
11
ADoroyal of Final Tract MaD No. 22761
RECOMMENDATION:
11.1 Approve Final Tract Map No. 22761, subject to the Conditions of
Approval.
12
ADDrOyal Of Final Tract MaD No. 22762
RECOMMENDATION:
12.1 'Approve Final Tract Map No. 22762, subject to the Conditions of
Approval.
~-- 21egertdNO71412 4 07/08/~2
13
ADDrOyal Of Purchase - City Mobile Radio Svstem
RECOMMENDATION:
13.1 Approve the purchase of an 800 Megahertz (MHZ) radio system.
13.2 Appropriate $29,671 from Unreserved Fund Balance.
14
15
Contract Change Orders- PW 91-03 Rencho California Road Benefit District
RECOMMENDATION:
14,1
Approve Contract Change Orders consisting of:
A $828.30 increase in contract amount due to removal of signal
controller base and installation of at-grade foundation for new controller.
A $700 increase in contract amount for raising seven (7) water valves
located after excavation started.
A $1,423.80 increase in contract amount due to reconstruction of one
(1) manhole to be removed down to shaft and reconstructed per Public
Works Standard Specifications.
A $1,257.50 increase in contract due to additional equipment and
unusual work conditions required to make slope grade due to Southern
California Edison's moving two additional poles located within right-of-
way.
14.2
Advance $4,209.60 from the Development Impact Fund to the
Reimbursement District Fund and appropriate $4,209.60 to Account No.
011-165-605-44-5804.
Adooti~n of Personnel Resolution
RECOMMENDATION:
15.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 92-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ESTABLISHING POSITIONS AND SALARY RANGES
~ 21~gendl/071412 S 07/08/82
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before a public
hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the
approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the
projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or
someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondences
delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing.
16
ADDearl NO. 24 (Aooeal of Plannino Commission Denial of Plot Plan No. 8839. Revised
No. 1, Amended No. 2)
Property located at 41910 Sixth Street.
RECOMMENDATION:
16.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 92-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVING APPEAL NO. 24, THEREBY APPROVING PLOT PLAN NO. 9939,
REVISED NO. 1, AMENDED NO. 2, CHANGING USES ON THE SECOND FLOOR
FROM 5,413 SQUARE FEET OF STORAGE TO 3,600' SQUARE FEET OF OFFICE
SPACE AND 1,813 SQUARE FEET OF STORAGE ON PROPERTY KNOWN AS
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 922-024-027
COUNCIL BUSINESS
17
Consideration of Chamber of Commerce Contract Services Aoreement - FY 1992-1993
RECOMMENDATION:
17.1 Approve an agreement between the City and the Chamber of Commerce
in the amount of $46,000.
18
2/egeedN071412
DevelQomental Services Efficiency Reoort - Cil;v Manacjer's Blue Ribbon Committee
RECOMMENDATION:
18.1 Publicly extend appreciation to the Blue Ribbon Comittee members and
receive and file report.
07/08/82
19
ADDoiOtments to Planning Commission
RECOMMENDATION:
The City Council Ad Hoc Review Committee recommends:
19.1 Reappoint Commissioners Billie Blair and Steven Ford to a four year.term
of office.
20
Licens~ Agreement with Temeka Advertising for "Kiosk" Sign Program
(Continued from the meeting of May 26; 1992)
RECOMMENDATION:
20.1 Award a License Agreement with Temeka Advertising for the installation
of the City's "Kiosk" signs.
20.2 Authorize the Mayor and the City Clerk to execute the agreement on
behalf of the City.
21 Reauei~t for Funding - Friends of French Valley Airport
RECOMMENDATION:
21.1 Authorize an expenditure of $7,000 for promotion of the French Valley
Aviation Center Dedication Ceremony.
CITY MANAGER REPORT
CITY ATTORNEY REPORT
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT
Executive SeSsion: July 15, 1992, 12:00 noon, Temecula City Hall, Main Conference Room,
pursuant to 54956.9 (a) City of Temecula vs U.S. Border Patrol and 54956.9 (b) and (c).
Next regular meeting: July 28, 1992, 7:00 PM, Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol
Street, Temecula, California
2,'egendW071482 7 07/08/92
TEME'CULA':COMMUNITY'SERVIC;S: DISTRICT MEETING - (To be held at 8:00)
CALL TO ORDER:
President Ronald J. Parks
ROLL CALL:
DIRECTORS:
Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Mu~oz, Parks
PUBLIC COMMENT:
Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors, should
present a completed pink "Request to Speak' to the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state
your name end address for the record.
CONSENT CALENDAR
I Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of the meeting of June 23, 1992.
Aoreement for Concession Services
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1
Approve an Agreement with Barbara Thompson of Barbie's Hot dogs,
Etc. to provide concession services at City Facilities and Special Events
for the City of Temecula.
GENERAL MANAGERS REPORT - Dixon
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT - Nelson
BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS
f*
ADJOURNMENT: Next regular meeting July 28,1992, 8:00 PM, Temecula Community
· Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California
2/lelndN071412 I 07/01/82
TEMECUj :~".RFDEVELOPMENT A~ENCY. MEETIN~
CALL TO ORDER:
ROLL CALL:
Chairperson J. Sal Mur~oz presiding
AGENCY MEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Parks,
Mur~oz
PUBLIC COMMENT:
Anyone wishing to address the Agency, should present a
completed pink "Request to Speak" to the City Clerk. When you
are called to speak, please come forward and state your name
and address for the record.
AGENCY BUSINESS
I Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
2.2
Approve the minutes of June 23, 1992.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
AGENCY MEMBER'S REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT: Next regular meeting July 28 , 1992, 8:00 PM, Temeculs
Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California
2/ageride/071412 I 07/Oe/~2
ITEM NO.
1
ITEM
NO.
2
MINUTES OF A JOINT MEETING
WITH THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL AND
THE CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION
HELD JUNE 17, 1992
A joint meeting of the Temecula City Council and the Temecula Planning Commission was
called to order Wednesday, June 17, 1992, 6:05 P.M., at the Temecula City Hall Conference
Room, 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. The meeting was called to order by
Mayor Patricia H. Birdsall. Councilmember Moore led the flag salute.
PRESENT: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Moore, Mu~oz, Parks, Birdsall
ABSENT: I COUNCILMEMBERS: Lindemans
PRESENT: 3 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Blair, Chiniaeff, Fahey
ABSENT: 2 COUNCILMEMBERS: Ford, Hoagland
Also present were City Manager David Dixon, City Clerk June Greek, Planning Director Gary
Thornhill, and Gall Zigler, Minute Clerk.
PUBLIC COMMENT
None
Commissioner Ford arrived at 6:10 P.M.
COUNCIL BUSINESS
e
INTRODUCTION AND UPDATE ON GENERAL PLAN WORK PROGRAM
Gary Thornhill presented the staff report. He advised that staff would like a reo
evaluation of policies with respect to service levels, due to the fact that many
intersections would operate below the policy service level of "D" at build-out. Mr.
Thornhill stated that the purpose of the meeting is to get the Council and
Commission's comments and direction.
PRESENTATION ON CIRCULATION ISSUES
Bob Davis, of Wilbur Smith & Associates, reviewed the status of the Circulation
Element Analysis as follows:
Existing Conditions Traffic Model Calibration
Development of Traffic Forecast Model
~ JCCPCMIN6/17192 -1 * 6/29192
JOINT CITY COUNCIL/PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
JUNE 17, 1992
Development and Analysis of Build-Out Traffic Forecasts Based on Draft Land
Use Plan Combined With:
* Modified SWAP Circulation Element
* Draft Circulation Element
* Enhanced Circulation System
Karen Gully, explained that the Planning Center re-evaluated the initial land use
designations and made some refinements to the way land uses are converted to floor
area ratios. They then came back with a recommendation to reduce the floor area
ratios.
Mr. Davis advised of the following problem areas which still exist after preparation of
the draft circulation element:
* . Winchester Road Corridor
* State Highway 79 South (between Pala Road and Interstate 15)
* Jefferson Avenue (Overland Drive to Date Street)
* Rancho California Road (I-15 West of Margarita Road)
* Ynez Road (Winchester Road to Equity Drive)
* Front Street (Rancho California Road to Santiago Road, assuming a two lane
road is maintained)
* Date Street (Madison Avenue to Ynez Road)
* Murrieta Hot Springs Road (Madison Avenue to Winchester Road)
Mr. Davis stated that the following improvements were addressed in order to alleviate
some of the problems areas:
* Winchester Road; interchange at Date Street and an extension of Date Street
across Murrieta Hot Springs Road to the into Winchester Road
* Highway 79 South; extension of Pala Road across Winchester to tie into Ynez
Road
* Enhancing the West Side Corridor by calling for a major arterial roadway
through Murrieta.
JCCPCMIN6/17192 -2- 6/29/92 ~
JOINT CITY COUNCIL/PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
#
JUNE 17, 1992
Front Street; providing continuity between Pujol Street and Diaz Road.
* Extending the Overland Crossing to tie into Diaz.
* Extension of a road to tie into Adams, cross Santa Gertrudes Creek and tie into
the Business Park area.
* Extension of Hunter Road to draw some traffic off of Murrieta Hot Springs
Road.
* Additional crossing at Elm Street (two lane crossing)
Mr. Davis stated that upon completion of the Enhanced Circulation System element,
improvements were noticed in the following areas:
* Jefferson Avenue
* Winchester Road
* Date Street
* Murrieta Hot Springs Road
* Margartia Road
* Ynez Road
Mr. Davis explained that with all the improvements to the circulation element there are
some areas of roadways that will operate below the policy goal of a minimum of
service level "D".
Mr. Davis recommended the following as mitigation options:
Transportation Demand Management Program
* Ride Sharing
* Flex Time
* Alternative Non-Motorized Modes
* 'Transit Subsidies
Public Transit Service
* Express Transit
~'- JCCPCMIN6/17~92 -3- 6/29192
JOINT CITY COUNCIL/PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
* Fixed Route Transit
* Dial-A-Ride :
* Establish and Support Light Rail Transit Corridors
* Transportation Systems Management Techniques
* Smart Signal Systems
* Intersection Improvements
* Reserved High Occupancy Lanes
JUNE 17, 1992
3. QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
Randy Jackson, of the Planning Center, stated that the City's traffic circulation is
heavily impacted by outside development, and by simply changing the land use, no
significant changes can be realized. Based on the limited number of land use decisions
left to be made, however, there are some things that can be done to improve
circulation, such as moving jobs to the other side of the freeway, and placing housing
in areas of employment.
Gary Thornhill recommended that the policy be a little more flexible. He advised that
as the policy is currently written, if a project comes through which creates a service
level "E", it would have t~ be denied based on the policy.
Mayor Birdsall declared a recess at 7:30 P.M., at which time she excused herself from the
meeting. Vice Chairmen Fahey reconvened the meeting at 7:40 P.M.
Randy Jackson explained the current and proposed Floor Area Ratios as follows:
CURRENT PROPOSED
Small Retail .23 .25
Large Retail .25 .30
Industrial .36 .40
Office Building .47 .50
Mr. Jackson added that the proposed Floor Area Ratios would be the target with a
range as follows:
Small Retail .2 - .4
Large Retail .25 - 1
Industrial .3-1.5
JCCPCMINe/1 7192 -4- 6/29192 ~
JOINT CITY COUNCIL/PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JUNE 17, 1992
Office Building .4 - 1.0
Mr. Jackson stated that if a developer offered shared parking, trails, etc., then they
could be allowed the higher F.A.R.
After lengthy discussions, it was the consensus of the Planning Commission and the
City Council, to direct staff to go back to the consultants and re-evaluate the land use,
evaluate service levels after improvements and look at reducing floor area ratios.
Randy Jackson added that a list of projects that might not comply with the policy
requirement of service level "D" would be necessary.
Bob Davis was directed to evaluate the following improvements:
* Winchester Corridor - (Continue to Elm Street as a secondary roadway (four
lanes) include a two lane extension North of that to De Luz).
* Include a continuous extension between Alvarado and Overland.
* Continue to include realignment of Pujol/Felix Valdez to intersect with Diaz.
* Pursue extension of Date Street from Murrieta Hot Springs Road to Winchester
Road.
* Continue to include a over-crossing North of Murrieta Hot Springs Road.
* Extension of Hunter Road to Whitewood Road.
* New interchange at Keller Road.
* Connection of Calle Contento with Murrieta Hot Springs Road.
CITY MANGER'S REPORT
None
CITY COUNCII~ REPORTS
None
PLANNING COiMMISSION REPORTS
NONe
-- JCCPCMIN6/17/92 -5- 6129192
JOINT CITY COUNCIL/PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JUNE 17, 1992
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Moore to adjourn at
8:45 P.M., to a regular meeting of the Temecula City Council June 23, 1992 P.M., Temecula
Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California.
It was moved by Commission Chiniaeff, seconded by Commissioner Ford to adjourn at 8:45
P.M., to a joint meeting of the Temecula City Council and the City of Temecula Planning
Commission June 24, 1992, 6:00 P.M., Temecula City Hall Conference Room, 43174
Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
Mayor Patricia H. Birdsall
Chairman John E. Hoagland
Secretary
JCCPCMIN6/17192 -6- 6/29192
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
HELD JUNE 23, 1992
A regular meeting of the Temecula City Council was called to order at 6:23 PM in the
Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California. Mayor Patricia H.
Birdsall presiding.
PRESENT 5
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Lindemans, Moore, Mu~oz,
Parks, Birdsall
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Also present were City Manager David F. Dixon, City Attorney Scott F. Field, and City Clerk
June S. Greek.
EXECUTIVE SESSION
Mayor Birdsall declared a recess to an executive session at 6:23 PM pursuant to Government
Code Section 54956.9 (a) to discuss pending litigation in the matter of the City of Temecula
vs the U.S. Border Patrol and Government Code Section 54956.9(c).
Mayor Birdsall convened the regular meeting with all members present at 7:11 PM.
INVOCATION
The invocation was given by Bishop Tom Smith, Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The audience was led in the pledge of allegiance by Councilmember Mu~oz.
PRESENTATIONS/
PROCLAMAT~:ONS
Mayor Birdsall: proclaimed June 27-28th to be "Amateur Radio Week 1992". She presented
Ron Perry with the proclamation. Mr. Perry invited the City Council and citizens to attend a
demonstration to be held at French Valley Airport on Saturday, June 27th from 11:00 AM to
9:00 AM on the 28th.
Mayor Birdsall proclaimed the month of July 1992 to be the "Month of the Arts", and
presented Jim Meyier, President of the Arts Council with the proclamation. Mr. Meyler
announced that the Arts Festival will take place July 17th - 26th and invited the Council and
citizens to participate. He distributed the 1992 Arts Festival poster, painted by local artist
Teresa Bell, to members of the Council.
Minutes\06\23\92 -1 - 07/O1/92
City Council Minutes June 23, 1992
Mayor Birdsall proclaimed Sunday, June 28th, 1992 as "Families Helping Families Day". Carol
Gamboni, accepted the proclamation and invited the City Council and community to support
the families of the victims of the tragedy by joining together for a family picnic, held on June
28th at the High School Soccer Fields, 1:00 PM to 4:00 PM.
Mayor Birdsall proclaimed July 1, 1992 as "Happy Birthday Murrieta Day" in honor of
Murrieta's first birthday. She announced a celebration will be held on June 27th at the
California Oaks Sports Park and the City of Murrieta will also host an Open House at the
Murrieta City Hall on July 1, 1992.
City Attorney Field reported on executive session actions regarding the decision of the Federal
Court to deny the City's request for a temporary restraining order to prohibit Border Patrol
pursuit's within the City of Temecula. He indicated the purpose of the suit was not to
interfere with enforcement of immigration laws, or remove the Border Patrol from the City of
Temecula. He stated after discussion of the issue, the City Council directed the City
Attorney to analyze the City's options to amend and refile the complaint and report back in
two weeks.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
John Affolter, 34121 De Portola Road, addressed the City Council in support of the Border
Patrol. He stated there is a real need for this service in the Country, as well as our
community, listing the millions of dollars spent each year on illegal alien services, such as
uncompensated medical care, criminal justice, education, etc.
Mayor Birdsall stated it is not the City Council's intent to close the border patrol office in
Temecula, only to review the pursuit policy, as it relates to cooperation with Federal, State
and City agencies.
Sandra Wilson, 40390 Carmelita Circle, spoke in support of the "Families Helping Families"
day and asked that the Community pull together and support this picnic.
James Marpie, 27120 El Rancho Drive, Sun City, addressed the City Council regarding the
retention and detention of rainfall on site and asked that City ordinances be updated to include
these types of methods.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Councilmember Mu~oz requested the removal of Item 4 and 7 from the Consent Calendar.
Minutes\06%23\92 -2-
O7/01/92
City Council Minutes June 23, 1992
It was moved by Councilmember Moore, seconded by Councilmember Mur~oz to approve
Consent Calendar Items 1-3, 5, 6, 8-13. :
Standard Ordinance Adootion Procedure
1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions
included in the agenda.
Minutes
2.1
2.2
Approve the minutes of June 4, 1992.
Approve the minutes of June 9, 1992.
Resolution ADOrovinQ List of Demands
3.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 92-54
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
Community Facilities District 88-12 At~reement with J.F. Davidson Associates. Inc. for
Professional Enoineerin[; Services Associated with I-15
5.1
Authorize J.F. Davidson Associates, Inc. to proceed with the final
preparation of plans, specifications, and estimates for Rancho California
Road and Winchester Road interchanges as detailed under Schedule "C"
of the original contract approved December 18, 1990, and reallocate
$17,800.00 from the Schedule "C" budget to the Overland
Overcrossing Budget for extra work associated with the preparation of
the Project Study Report.
Contract Amendment No. 2 to Community Facilities District 88-12 (Ynez Corridor)
Engineering Contract with J.F. Davidson Associates, Inc.
6r'1
Approve Contract Amendment No. 2 with J.F. Davidson Associates, Inc.
to provide additional engineering services in the amount of $53,434.
Minutes%06\23%92
-3- 07/01/92
City Council Minutes June 23, 1992
8. TemecMla Valley Via Del Coronado Storm Drain Staae 2. Tract No. 23267-3
Coooerative Aareement :
10.
11.
12.
8.1
Approve Temecula Valley Via Del Coronado Storm Drain Stage 2 (Tract
No. 23267-3) Cooperative Agreement with the Riverside County Flood
Control and Water Conservation District and the Presley Companies;
8.2
Authorize the execution and attestation of such agreement in its final;
form by the Mayor and City Clerk.
Develooment Services Trackina Software Acauisition
9.1
Approve the acquisition of the Sierra Computer Systems, Inc., (Sierra)
permit software package.
9.2
Approve the budget transfers included on Attachment A.
Solid Waste Program Rates and Services Resolution
10.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 92-55
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
AMENDING THE SOLID WASTE SERVICES AND CORRESPONDING RATES
APPLICABLE TO FRANCHISED AND GRANDFATHERED HAULERS FOR THE
COLLECTION, TRANSPORTATION, RECYCLING, COMPOSTING, AND
DISPOSAL OF SOLID WASTE AND CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS AND FOR
PROVIDING TEMPORARY BINIROLLOFF SERVICES IN ALL COMMERCIAL,
RESIDENTIAL, CONSTRUCTION, AND INDUSTRIAL AREAS WITHIN THE CITY
OF TEMECULA
Resolution Establishina the Basis for Various Bulldine Permits and Valuation
11.1
Continue to the meeting of July 28, 1992, to allow staff to meet with
the local Coordinating Committee regarding this resolution.
Contract Award for Plan Review Services
r'
12.1 Approve the award of contract to the Esgil Corporation, as the primary
.. plan review firm to provide complete plan review services to the Building
and Safety Department.
12.2
Approve the retention of Van Dorpe/Chou and Associates, Inc., and
Melad and Associates, to support the plan review needs of the City's
Building and Safety Department.
Minutes\06~23~92
-4- 07/01/92
City Council Minutes June 23.1992
SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES
13. Second Readine of Ordinance Amendine Uniform Buildine Code
13.1
Read by title only and adopt an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 92-13
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA,
CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THE FOLLOWING CODES WITH
CERTAIN AMENDMENTS THERETO: THE 1991 EDITION OF THE UNIFORM
BUILDING CODE, THE 1991 EDITION OF THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE
STANDARDS. THE 1991 EDITION OF THE UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE,
THE 1991 EDITION OF THE UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE, THE 1991 EDITION
OF THE UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, THE 1991 EDITION OF THE
UNIFORM CODE FOR THE ABATEMENT OF DANGEROUS BUILDINGS, THE
1991 EDITION OF THE UNIFORM HOUSING CODE, THE 1991 EDITION OF THE
UNIFORM FIRE CODE, THE 1991 EDITION OF THE UNIFORM FIRE CODE
STANDARDS AND THE 1991 EDITION OF THE UNIFORM SWIMMING POOLS,
SPAS AND HOT TUB CODE
Solicitation of Bids for the Extension of Margarita Road from Solana Way to
Winche;ter Road
Councilmember Mufioz asked what the City's options will be if necessary right-aways
are not obtained.
City Manager Dixon reported that it is staff's intention to work through this issue for
the next 45 days while bids are being accepted. He stated the worst case would
require obtaining the land through condemnation. He explained this project is
necessary to complete the Ynez corridor circulation and it is important to send a
message to property owners that the City is serious about this project and will set in
motion whatever legal remedies are necessary.
City Attorney Field stated that hopefully this issue can be resolved on a mutually
agreeable basis, however other options do exist as a "last resort" scenario.
It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans, seconded by Councilmember Moore to
authorize the extension of Margarita Road from Solana Way to Winchester Road.
The motion was unanimously carried.
Minutes%06\23~92
°5-
O7~1~2
City Council Minutes June 23. 1992
Contract ChanQe Order No. 001 on Project No. PW 92-01 - Street and Sidewalk
Imorovements at Various Schools ..
Councilmember Mu~oz asked what is being done with trees that have been removed
due to this change order. Director of Public Works Tim Serlet stated that in all cases
an effort is made to relocate trees. He reported that in this case it was not possible
to relocate due to the type and age of trees involved.
Counci|member Mur~oz asked why these improvements were not made at the time the
school was built. City Manager Dixon explained that these schools were built many
years ago and the school's budget did not cover the cost for all improvements.
Councilmember Mur~oz asked what policy the City has with the School District for
future schools. City Manager Dixon reported that all schools built in the last few years
have included curbs, gutters and sidewalks.
Councilmember Parks asked why there is a $12,500 charge for a 10 day delay and
asked fiat staff evaluate that charge.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Moore to approve
staff recommendation as follows:
7.1
Approve Contract Change Order No. 001 for Project PW 92-01 in the
amount of $36,911.50;
7.2
Transfer $20,322.41 from the Measure "A" Fund to the Capital Projects
Fund and appropriate $20,322.41 to Account No. 021-165-607-44-
5804 from Unreserved Fund Balance.
RECESS
Mayor Birdsall called a recess at 7:56 PM. The meeting was reconvened at 8:10 PM with all
members present.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
14. Zone Change No. 5631 and Vesting Tentative Tract MaD No. 25320
Mayor Birdsall announced the public hearing was opened and continued at a prior
meeting.
Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning presented the staff report.
Councilmember Parks asked what staff's recommendation prior to the Planning
Commission hearing had been. Director of Planning Thornhill answered the original
recommendation was for approval, based on the project's consistency with SWAP.
Minutes~06~23\92 -6- O7/O1/92
o°
City Council Minutes June 23. 1992
Barry Burnell, 32423 Holiday Street,. representing the applicant, addressed the City
Council regarding issues relating to the general plan, i.e., topography, drainage and
density. He stated that much of the surrounding development is consistent with this
project and he showed slides of existing property as well as computer simulated slides
showing the project at full build-out. He encouraged the City Council to carefully
consider all the issues and asked that this project be approved.
Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans asked how close the Community Recreation Center and
amphit'heater will be to this proposed project and stated he feels this will create a noise
problem for residents in the proposed project.
Esther L. Schick, 42850 Santa Suzanne Place, in Lake Village, spoke in support of the
denial of zone change. She stated that new building will add silt and additional
problems to the Lake.
Marsha Slavin, 30110 La Primavera, spoke in support of the denial of Zone Change
No. 5'631. She asked that the City enter into negotiations to purchase this land for
use as a passive park.
Mayor Birdsall asked if it is the Lake Villages Homeowners desire that this land be left
as is, and questioned whether some of the silt problem is due to the land being
undeveloped. Ms. Slavin stated she feels the problems have been caused due to a gas
line being put in, with no re-vegetation of the hills. She further stated she is in favor
of "pocket parks" with grass and benches, or other types of passive parks. She
suggested this would be a good project for Temecula Valley High School and Boy
Scout Community Service Projects.
Phil Hoxsey, 43318 Cielo De Azul, spoke in support of the denial Zone Change No.
5631.
Norman K. Dunn, 30434 Colina Verde, spoke in support of the denial and requested
that the City commence negotiations for purchase of this land for a park.
Robert Rhein, 30353 Veronda Place, spoke in support of denial of Zone Change No.
5631 and presented the City Clerk with a petition containing 158 signatures.
Mike Medaris, 30601 Moontide Court, Vice President of Starlight Ridge Homeowners
Association, spoke in support of denial. He requested that the City enter into
negotiations to purchase this property for use as a park.
Nate Dibiasi, 30445 Miraloma Drive, spoke in support of the denial and asked that this
property be purchased by the City for use as a park.
Philip Saum, 43209 Vista Del Rancho, spoke in support of the denial.
Minutes~06~23\92 -7- 07/O1/92
City Council Minutes June 23.1992
Matt Mason, 30113 La Primavera St., spoke in support of denial, due to traffic
concerns.
James Marpie, spoke neither in support or against, but asked that the Council put
together ordinances that will require developers to put in water retention and detention
facilities and protect groundwater.
Mayor Birdsall closed the public hearing at 9:05 PM.
It was moved by Councilmember Mur~oz, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans to
reopen the public hearing and continue it for 30 days.
Mayor ,Pro Tern Lindemans requested that this be referred to staff to see if it is feasible
to purchase this property.
Mayor Birdsall stated she would like additional information regarding erosion control,
and specifically whether this project would contribute to the problem or help correct
it.
Councilmember Parks asked that input be given on whether needed improvements on
Pauba Road will be done if this project is not approved, and how they will be funded.
Mayor Birdsall called a brief recess at 9:10 PM to change the tape. The meeting was
reconvened at 9:11 PM.
Councilmember Moore stated she feels if the City purchases the land, it should not be
restricted for use as park land only.
The motion was unanimously carried.
RECESS
Mayor Birdsall called a recess at 9:13 PM. The meeting was reconvened following the
Community Services District Meeting and the Redevelopment Agency Meeting at 9:55 PM.
It was moved by Councilmember Moore, seconded by Councilmember Parks to extend the
meeting for 10 minutes. The motion was unanimously carried.
15.
Aooeal No. 26 (Aooeal of Condition of Aooroval No. 24 Reauiring a Block Wall Along
the Southern and Northern Portions of Conditional Use Permit No. 2, Revised No. 1)
Director of Planning Gary Thornhill presented the staff report.
Mayor Birdsall opened the public hearing at 10:04 PM.
Minutes~O6\23~,92
-8- 07~1J2
City Council Minutes June 23. 1992
16.
Eric Gable, representing the applicant, spoke in favor of the appeal, stating that
landscaping would be a more effective screen and will not cause the graffiti problem
that is often associated with a wall.
Councilmember Mu~oz asked if the proposal is to remove the wall completely or just
a section of the wall. Mr. Gable stated he proposed complete removal of the wall.
Mayor Birdsall closed the public hearing at 10:09 PM.
Councilmember Parks stated he prefers the idea of landscaping rather than walls and
if the Planning Department feels they can adequately screen the bays from Ynez Road
he is in favor. He stated, however, that he does not want to see the open bays from
Ynez Road and suggested having a landscape screen to the face of the building and
a wall the rest of the way.
Councilmember Moore stated she does not want to see the bays, however if the
Planning Department feels landscaping is adequate, she would be in favor of
eliminating the condition.
It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans, seconded by Councilmember Moore
uphold the appeal and to direct staff to submit the landscape plan to the Planning
Commission for approval.
City Manager Dixon expressed concern stating it needs to be clearly identified what
the Council wants in terms of landscaping and where walls begin and end. He also
expressed concern that adequate controls would be placed on landscape maintenance,
and stated that walls are permanent.
It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans, seconded by Councilmember Mu~oz to
extend the meeting until 10:30 PM. The motion was unanimously carried.
City Attorney Field suggested that the motion be amended as follows: Uphold the
appeal of Condition No. 24 with the stipulation that the landscape plan be submitted
to the Planning Commission for approval and that a condition of approval be added to
require a landscape agreement be executed and recorded with the plot plan to assure
that proper landscape maintenance is provided.
Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans, and Councilmember Moore amended the motion and
§econd'accordingly. The motion was unanimously carried.
Aooeal No. 20 for Plot Plan No. 10605, Amendment No. 1, Revised Permit No. 1 and
Variance No. 11 - To-Mac EnaineerinQ
Director of Planning Gary Thornhill presented the staff report.
Minutee~,06\23\92
-9- 07~1J2
City Council Minutes June 23. 1992
Mayor Birdsall called a brief recess at 10:22 PM to change the tape. The meeting was
reconvened at 10:23 PM.
Mayor Birdsall opened the public hearing at 10:24 PM.
Tony Terrich, 41934 Main Street, To-Mac Engineering, representing the applicant,
requested that the appeal be granted . He stated this gravel paving is a porous
pavement and will recharge ground water. He stated that there are other similar
business that do not have asphalt parking lots. He requested that since the Old Town
Specific Plan is in process end asphalt may not be allowed in Old Town, this condition
of approval not be enforced at this time.
Councilmember Mur~oz asked how long the building has been occupied without a
certificate of occupancy. Mr. Terrich responded approximately 11/2 years, however
he did have approval for temporary occupancy by staff.
James Marpie, 27120 El Rancho Road, Sun City, stated gravel is an ideal porous
pavement and recommended this be considered as an acceptable paving.
It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans, seconded by Councilmember Moore to
extend the meeting for 15 minutes. The motion was unanimously carried.
Mayor Birdsall closed the public hearing at 10:35 PM.
Councilmember Moore stated she asked staff to contact the Urban Design Group, who
is doing the design work.for the Old Town Specific Plan, and after speaking to them
learned that gravel will not be a recommended paving in Old Town Specific Plan.
It was moved by Councilmember Moore, seconded by Councilmember Mu~oz to
approve staff recommendation.
Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans stated he likes the old time flavor of gravel. He stated he
would recommend that the applicant be given a year until the Old Town Specific Plan
is set by the proper citizen groups and proper hearings.
Councilmember Mu~oz stated he feels that the property owner should live up to the
conditions of approval.
FVlayor 'Birdsall requested a roll call vote on the motion on the floor.
The motion failed by the following roll call vote:
AYES: 2 COUNCILMEMBERS: Moore, Mu~oz
NOES:
3 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Lindemans, Parks
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Minutes%O6\23\92 -1 O- O7/O1/92
CiW Council Minutes June 23, 1992
It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans, seconded by Councilmember Parks to
grant a variance of 18 months at which time it comes back to the Planning
Commission and the condition of approval will be met.
City Manager Dixon stated he feels the City Attorney should clarify such points as
what happens if the property is sold, and the understanding that in 18 months the
property owner will comply.
It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans, seconded by Councilmember Parks to
extend the meeting for five minutes. The motion was unanimously carried.
City Attorney Field suggested the following: denial of the appeal and the variance and
grant an amendment to the plot plan for a period of 18 months, subject to the
condition that within 18 months it must be brought into compliance, using the
materials specified and approved in the Old Town Specific Plan. Second, that an
agreement be recorded with the property, notifying any future owners of this
condition.
Director of Planning Thornhill suggested that the motion be amended to six months
after the Specific Plan is adopted. Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans agreed to amend it to
one year after the Old Town Specific Plan final adoption. Councilmember Parks
seconded the amendment.
Councilmember Parks stated he feels it is the ideal opportunity to test gravel as an
alternate source of paving, which would meet the requirement of a porous pavement
and allow water to percolate down in the soil and be retained on site.
City Manager Dixon stated that a specific time period of 18 months would be
preferable to 1 year after the Old Town Specific Plan is adopted, since a calendar date
is much easier to administer.
Minutes\O6~23\92 -11 - O7/O1/92
City Council Minutes June 23, 1992
Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans amended the motion to be 18 months, Councilmember
Parks, amended his second. Final motion is as follows:
It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans, seconded by Councilmember Parks to
deny the appeal and the variance and grant an amendment to the plot plan for a period
of 18 months, subject to the condition that within 18 months it must be brought into
compliance, using the materials specified and approved in the Old Town Specific Plan.
Second, that an agreement be recorded with the property notifying any future owners
of this condition.
16.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 92-56
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DENYING
APPEAL NO. 20, UPHOLDING PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION TO DENY
PLOT PLAN NO. 10605, AMENDMENT NO. 1, REVISED PERMIT NO. I AND
VARIANCE NO. 11 TO ALLOW A GRAVEL PARKING LOT LOCATED ON THE
SOUTH SIDE OF MAIN STREET, 100 FEET WEST OF MERCEDES
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES:
3 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Lindemans, Parks, Birdsall
NOES:
2 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Moore, Mu~oz
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
City Manager Dixon stated he wanted to make it clear that paving is the only condition
of approval that the applicant is relieved from.
CITY MANAGER REPORTS
City Manager Dixon reported on the status of the State of California possible budget
cuts that will have an effect on cities in California. He explained the if the State
Legislature withdraws motor vehicle in lieu tax revenues from the cities, Temecula will
lose over a million dollars. The State Legislature may also attach the property tax bail
out revenues, which fortunately does not affect Temecula. He stated that he feels it
is wrong for the State to transfer the responsibility of balancing the State budget to
local government.
He stated in the future it is imperative that the City clearly identify the cost of projects
and know the impacts. He stated he feels Temecula has lived within its means and
done a excellent job at staying within its revenues.
Minutee\06\23~92 - 12- 07/01/92
City Council Minutes June 23. 1992
CITY ATTORNEY REPORTS
None given.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Councilmember Moore asked that old campaign signs be removed from the City.
Manager Dixon stated he would look into the matter.
City
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans, seconded by Councilmember Moore to adjourn
at 11:01 PM. The motion was unanimously carried.
Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
Minutes%O6%23\92 -13- O7/O1/92
MINUTES OF AN ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
HELD JOINTLY WITH THE TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION
JUNE 24, 1992
An adjourned regular meeting of the Temecula City Council and the Temecula Planning
Commission was called to order in the Main Conference Room, Temecula City Hall, 43174
Business Park Drive at 6:10 PM, Mayor Patricia H. Birdsall presiding.
ROLL CALL
Temecula City Council
PRESENT 4
COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Temecula Plannine Commission
PRESENT: 1 COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: 4 COMMISSIONERS:
Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore,
Parks
Mu~oz
Chiniaeff
Blair, Fahey, Ford, Hoagland
Also present were City Manager David Fo Dixon, Planning Director Gary Thornhill and City
Clerk June S. Greek.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The audience was led in the Pledge of Allegiance by Councilmember Ronald J. Parks.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Sydney B. Vernon, 30268 Mersey Court, asked about the status of the proposed gambling
casino on the Pachanga Indian Reservation.
Councilmember Parks stated that he has asked staff to seek the necessary information from
the Pachenga Tribal Council.
Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans advised that he has investigated this matter independently and has
been told the federal government is responsible for negative impacts upon any neighboring
jurisdiction as a result of development permitted on indian reservations.
Planning Director Gary Thornhill reported that he met with a member of the tribal council and
was informed there are several options being looked at and no decisions have been made.
The tribal council has indicated a desire and willingness to work with the City on all common
issues including any development in this area.
Minutes\6124\92 -1 - 06125/92
City Council Minutes
June 24.1992
COUNCIL BUSINESS
IntroduCtion and Update on General Plan Work Proaram
Planning Director Gary Thornhill made brief introductory remarks on the general plan
work program to date and introduced Bob Davis of the firm of Wilbur Smith
Associates, the traffic consultant for the general plan, who reviewed the traffic
analysis zones and discussed several locations of land use deintensification, which
have been added by the consultants. He also displayed several suggested changes to
the final draft circulation plan which have been worked out as a result of direction
given by the City Council and Planning Commission at the meeting of June 17, 1992.
FollOw-uP On Circulation Issues
Council and Commissioner Chiniaeff discussed the levels of service for State Route 79
So., the Rancho California Road corridor and Winchester Road as a result of the land
deintensification which was presented.
Commissioner Chiniaeff questioned how much deintensification of the land use i the
area of French Valley Airport would be necessary to significantly change the level of
service on Winchester Road. Mr. Davis replied that the French Valley Airport area
represents only a very small portion of the impact on Winchester Road. He said the
majority of the traffic is generated further north of that area.
Karen Gulley of the Planning Center outlined the areas of land use that have been
suggested for reductions in the floor area ratios (FAR) along Winchester Road, on
Rancho California Road and on Highway 79 So. She explained that not only reductions
in the floor area ratios are suggested but in the case of the Rancho California Road
corridor and the area at State Route 79 So. and Pala Road, some reduced densities are
also recommended.
Bob Davis then described the possibility for increasing the capacity on SR 79 So., if
the assumption is made that the interchange at the I-15 will be upgraded.
Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans asked if it is possible to show the circulation element in 5,
10, 15 and 20 year increments showing the possible development of the roadway
systems at those time periods·
Randy Jackson of the Planning Center said that while the development of the roadway
system is based on the way in which development occurs, a systems management
plan would address this concern·
Minutes\6124\92
-2-
06125192
City Council Minutes June 24. 1992
City Manager Dixon stated that all of the points of importance that have been touched
on for Capital improvement needs, can only be projected clearly for approximately one
or two years. He stated that a growth management plan can assist in making
assumptions to prioritized when the various roads need to be constructed.
Councilmember Parks stressed the need to concentrate on the policies and goals of the
general plan and not try to do exact time projections.
Larry Markham, Markham and Associates, 41750 Winchester Road, asked if the
general plan consultants have looked at the possible plan by Caltrans to redirect
Highway 79 So. to the northeast via Butterfield Stage Road to link with Winchester
Road. Mr. Davis replied this has been considered but the impacts on the Winchester
Road/I-15 intersection are not expected to be changed substantially if this should
OCCUr,
Mr. Davis then touched on the circulation element goals and policies and led a
discussion of the Travel Demand Management process which would require the
application of tiers of 'conditions to achieve the. desired level of service.
Public Works Director/City Engineer Tim Serlet advised that most of the problem
intersections will be controlled by the actions of the Riverside County Transportation
Commission (RCTC).
Commissioner Chiniaeff suggested that the discussion section of Goal I of the
Circulation Element would be the appropriate place to include a statement that there
may be overriding considerations caused by regional impacts beyond the control of the
City. Mr. Jackson of the Planning Center concurred.
Planning Director Thornhill asked if the Council is satisfied with the changes in the floor
area ratios outlined earlier as well as the suggested lowering of density. The Council
and Commissioner Chiniaeff agreed by unanimous consensus that these adjustments
are satisfactory, with the exception of the change in land use designation at 79 So.
and Pala Road. It was agreed that the designation should remain as originally
established.
Discussion on Draft Preferred Land Use MaD
John Meyer, Senior Planner, gave a presentation of the proposed changes from the
draft preferred land use map. He reviewed the changes as identified on the exhibit
which was distributed to the participants.
Councilmember Parks questioned the reason for eliminating the striping of the land use
areas to indicate mixed densities. Karen Gully advised that this will be accomplished
through the text of the specific plan areas.
Minutes\6/24%92 -3- 06125/92
City Council Minutes June 24. 1992
It was agreed by consensus to have each project on the exhibit presented by staff and
to make comments on those projects which might contain areas of concern.
Proiect 6 - Rancho Hiahlands
Mayor Birdsall questioned if this area should be shown as going north to
Rancho California Road. Mr. Meyer responded that although the Rancho
Highlands Development does not go that far north the specific plan does.
Project 7 -TT 25892
Larry Markham suggested that there are other 1/2 acre parcels in the Los
Ranchitos area which should also be designated as a change from VL to L.
Proiect 11 - PP 11001 and Marc)arita Corridor
Direction was given to staff to have all of the area around this site left the
same designation as it currently has.
Proiect 23 - Public Institution Land Use DesiQnation
Direction was given to staff that all land use designations which are approved
by Conditional Use Permits (CUP's) be eliminated from the institutional land use
designation and therefore the true large institutional uses, i.e. schools, libraries,
etc. will be correctly reflected by this land use designation.
Mayor Birdsall requested that the Temecula Community Center also be given
this designation.
Counciimember Parks questioned when the public will be given the opportunity to give
input on the land use element. Mr. Meyer responded that the first public hearing will
take place during the first week in October.
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
None presented.
CITY COUNCIl, REPORTS
No reports presented.
Minutes~6124%92
06125/92
City Council Minutes June 24, 1992
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans, seconded by Councilmember Parks to adjourn
at 8:08 PM to the next regular City Council Meeting at 7:00 PM on July 14, 1992, Temecula
Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California. The motion was unanimously
carried with Councilmember Mufioz absent.
ATTEST:
PATRICIA H. BIRDSALL, MAYOR
JUNE S. GREEK, CITY CLERK
Minutee\6124\92 -S- 06125/92
ITEM
NO.
3
RESOLUTION NO. ~2-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN
CLMMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN
EXHIBIT A
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE,
DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A have been
audited by the City Manager, and that the same are hereby allowed in the mount of
$814,313.16
SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 14th day of July, 1992.
ATTEST:
Patrich H. Birdsall, Mayor
June S. Greek,~ City Clerk
[SEAL]
266 I
CITY OF TEMECULA
LIST OF DEMANDS
06/19/92
06/26/92
06/30/92
07/02/92
07/14/92
06/18/92
07/02/92
TOTAL CHECK RUN:
TOTAL CHECK RUN:
TOTAL CHECK RUN:
TOTAL CHECK RUN:
TOTAL CHECK RUN:
TOTAL PAYROLL:
TOTAL PAYROLL:
TOTAL UST OF DEMANDS FOR 7/14/92 COUNCIL MEETING:
DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND:
CHECKS:
001'
011
014
016
019
021
029
052
PAYROLL:
001
019
GENE ~AL
RANC~O CA ROAD REIMB. DISTRICT
COMMUNITY DEVE. BLOCK GRANT(CDBG
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FUND (RDA)
TCSD
CAPITAL PROJECT-CITY
GENERAL(PAYROL~
TCSDIPAYROL~
TOTAL BY FUND:
$290,789.04
$129,899.39
$9,202.18
$8,119.62
$80,965.55
$32,227.00
$47,931.89
$332.81
$159,386.32
$55,459.36
$70,049.29
$371,392.53
$30,442.02
$22,974.75
$104,608.89
$98,917.84
$115,927.84
$814,313.16
$399,467,48
$214,845.68
$814,313.16
PREPARED BY KARMA MCINTYRE
MA FFICER
DAVID DIXON, CITY~MANAGER
,HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
~r~, 0e/12/92 04?7 05101/92 F!NAK~IAL
!067>! 0~/12/92 0408 ¢5101/~2 FINANCIAL ADViSOR:GO!~ STUDY
Check Totals:
00010514 08/16/92 WESTERNR WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNCIL
061692 06/16/92 06/16/92 ANNUAL MEETING 6/18/~2
00010516 0611~/V2 APPLEONE APPLE ONE
1441117 06110/92 11655
1441117-I 06/~0R2 ~1541
Check Totals:
05/26/92 W/E 5/301~2 FINANCE
04/22/92 TEMP.SERV. N/E 5/50}FINANCE
,.SW.O(: r:.OO ,
· ,.... ,.. ,:' .:
A,500.OO t. OO
%000.00 ri n,'.
100.00 0.00 !00.00
100.00 0.00 100.00
2!4.52 0.00 214.52
x84.2s o.oo 184.28
00010517 06/!~/92 ARTESIA
060~92
Check Totals:
ARTESIA IMPLEMENT
06109/?2 11650 05t27/92 E~ERBENCY TIRE REPAIR
398.80 0.00 ~98.80
60.00 0.00 60.00.
00010518 06/19/92 ^SSES=OR COUNTY
. ~ ASSESSOR
.... 05129192
Cneck Totals:
05/29192 ASSESSOR MAP COPIES 5/18 5/1~
60.00 O.O0 60.0C
16.50 0.00 16.50
06/!9/~2 AVP .vP VISION PLAN
061292 06/12/92
Cn.-k
06/12/92 INSURANCE PREM/JUNE
6!5.65 0.00 ;I~ 6=
00010520 06/19/92 CADDYSRA CADDY GRAPHICS
061592 06/15/92
Check Tutais:
06115/92 ART WORK FOR DAY CA~P SHIRTS
6!5.65 0.00 6t~ 6=
120.00 0.00 i20.00
64~481 06/05/92 11602
640672 05/?{°/~ 11602
Check Totals:
05/!3/t2 RUS RENTALS THRU jUNE ?2'
05/15R2 RUB RENTALS THRU JUNE
120.00 0.00 120.00
34.25 O.O0 34.2~
34.25 0.00 34.25
00010522 .... ~'~ .
vc~i,~= C'LIFORN CALIFORNIAN
08415 06/IIt92 10624
07740/7777 08/IB/92 10626
Check Totals:
04/01/92 PUBL,LBL NTC:PLAN.COM~;COUNCL
04/01/92 ~UBL,~G. NTC;PLAN.CO~M;COUNCL
68.50 0.00 68.50
115.06 0.00 !i~.06
58,85 0.00 59.85
Check Totals:
00010523 06/!9/92 CAMPBELL CAMPBELLS LIGHTING, SIGN/ELEC k
14881 0412~192 0329 12/18/9i REPLACE LAMPS-BALLAST;OLD TWN
171.91 0.00 171.~1
98,29 0.00 98.29
Check Totals:
00010524 06/!9f92 CiTYSUNN CITY OF SUNNYVALE
0615~2 061151~2 06115/92 PURge. COPY CI? DOCU~ENT
14.85 O.O0 !4.8~
0!)010525 06/1°,/92 CCFFMAN
(,60192
Check Totals:
ROF:'T A. COFFMAN
<'~/~/:~ v=.,v./~ ..........DAY .......
14.83 0.00 !4.S5
50.00 ¢.00 50.00
Chec!; Tctcl:-:
5:Y.:'r'51~ C.-:.'1~"% :[':"-%AL Z3L=3~-:I~: LiFE
0112~1 !::~,'i2.'i: {.,8/12,'92 :..':EjF' F'EF:S:.::;..
JU~{E T-.2
C~:i: Tstais:
,'~r~r:ir,--~ 06.'19/92 Ci:"YLINE CC;P'( LiNE
~'~ O~/Sn!SZ !162.~ 04/Oi,'~Z SEXYiCE CALLS: CCP!ERS
Check Totals:
000~528 0~/!9/~2 SOU~TCLE ~ ..... CLERK AND
~uu,~i~ RECORDE~
~1272 0~/~2/~2 ¢~/12/~2 ~='; FiSH/GANgS FEES EA-!¢ I ~" ~ ~.~¢ ~.~: nC
Check Totals: 1~275.00 O.O0 1~275.0~:
00010529 06119I~2 CROIE~UL ~ULIE CROne
' 061592 06/15R2 06/15R2 HILlAGE 23.52 0.00 25.52
Check Totals: 23.52 0.00 25.52
00010530 0&/19/92 DAVLIN DAVLIN
~F255184 06101192 11458 03I~0R2 AUDIO PROD.~TSS; HAY 2~-~2 i3O.OO 0.00 I~0.00
89-255187 06/I0/~2 11544 0~/20R2 AUDIO PRO.;PARKS & REC. 6/8 1~0.00 0.00 130.00
Check T~tals:
00010531 0~f19192 ~ENTiCA~ HNTICARE OF CALIFORNIA
0612~2 06112/72 06i12/~2 INCUR PRE~IU~i
;UNE g2
260.00 0,00 260.00
7~3.00 0,00 7E3.00
00010552 06'191~2 FEDERALE FEDERAL EXP
Check Totals:
785.00 O.O0 783.00
1B.O0 0.00 iS.O&
Check Totals:
n*l .... 06~'~/~ rT~T~M° FIRST .........
Q~v,v~o~ ............. THPRr~SvnN~
~20195 06117R2 !15B5 051081~2 PbLLOVER S~EATBH!RTS;ART~DRK
18,00 0,00 l~.O0
297.3~ 5,95 2~I.A4
00010534 06/Ig/~2 GFOA
0E15~2
Check Totals:
GOVT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOS,
06/!5R2 O&!!51~: PURCH OF BAG? PRNOUNC & LINKS
2~7.5~ 5.95 2~1,~--
57.18 0.00 57,18
Check Totals:
00010555 06119!~2 GLENfliES GLENNiES OFFICE PRODUCTS
I19!50-0 0~/15/92 11672 06/09R2 PODIU~ FOR CDNF. ROD~;C!TY HL
303.05 0.00 305.05
Check Totals:
0001055~ 05/!?/~2 GOLDENST GOLDEN STATE TRADING C~.
15058 06tlOR2 11659 O&tOl/?2 4~D SI~S
15076 06/12/72 11~35 05/27/~2 ~OUSE:HICROSOFT TYPE
Check Totals:
OOOlOS? 0~/!9/~2 BRAFF!TI BRAFFITi REMOVAL 8ERVISEB
05!51R2 0305 !O/OIRI GRAFtTI RE~OVAL;CITY OF TEL
r Check Totals:
0001¢558 06/!9/~2 B~EAT · B.LE.A.T., TRUST
0~12~2 06!121~2 0~/12/~2 PRE~!UHS/~UNE 72
505.05 0.00 505.05
812.30 0,00 812,50
!!8.52 0.00 ii~,52
950.82 0.00 ~30.82
6!~.00 O,OO 6!~.00
619.00 0,00 619.00
BOO.GO 0.00 BOG.O0
~ ~":7 0.03 ......
0-',/i!./~2 HEALTh.
Cnsct Totals:
HEALTH ......."'~ ....
05/2S/92 ,~c!; ........ A,':'. r,:,i,c i[.EKTi;iCA':i:3t~ v,-.
Checi Totals: 202,60 0.00
ln'i~ic~ D~t~ F'/O ~atE ;ei:rzzti~n Er:as Dis;cur.:
00010541 0b/19192 HiLLINDE DEE HILLIN
0~1~92 0~,'1S/92 ¢6/18/~2 TRAVEL EIPENES. APRIL 92 9.a4 0.00 ~.~
00010542 0&/!919~ HOFSTER~ DONNA HOFSTER
0~0~92 06/09192
C~eck T~tai~: 9.6~ 0.00 ~.~
06/09R2 SUPPLIES/SUMMER DAY CAMP 5%26 0.00 5~.2~
d0010543 06/!9/V2 HORIZON HORIZON WATER
0601V2 0&/01/92
Check Totals: 59.26 0.00 59.26
0&/01!92 MAY SERVICE 44.55 0.00 44.55
00010544 06!19R2 JOHNSONS JOHNSON~ SHARON
Check Totals: 44.55 0.00 44.55
06/16192 MILEAGE 511-~11 108.~2 0.00 I08.92
Check Tstals:
00010545 06/19/92 ~.AR!LYNS .~ARILYN'S COFFEE SERVICE
2175 0b1151~2 11647 05/0!/92 COFFEE SERVICE
!09.92 0.00 108.~2
47.01 0.0¢ 47.01
Check Totals:
00010546 06/!9/92 MCGAVRAN LORR! ANN ~CBAVRAN
061192 06/1!I92 06/11/~2 MILEA~E/PHOTDE
47.01 0,00 47.01
% "~ 0,00 ~ 7~
O0010M7 06/!?/92 OCSREPRD
400941
401283 Oa/
402173 06t
402696
402171 06/
402957
403492
405907 06/
406446 061
404128 06/,
404419
406511 06/
40?278 06/
40499~ 06/
Check Tntals:
DCE REPROGRAPHICS, INC.
06/)3/92 11586 05105/~2 PRINTING COSTS:COMLCENTER
)4/92 11596
)5/92 11586
)5/92 11586
)51~2 !1586
)8/92 11586
)8/92 11586
.1/92 11586
~1/~2 11586
~9/~2 11586
}9192 11586
,1/92 11586
2/92 11586
.0/92 1158~
05/05R2 PRINTING COSTS}COMM.CENTER
05/05/92 PR!NT1NB COSTS;CONLCENTER
05/05R2 PRINTING CDSTE;CDMM.CENTER
05/05/~2 PRINTINS UOSTS;COMM.CENTER
05/05/92'PRINTINS COSTS:COMM.CENTER
05/05/92 PRINTING COSTSICOMM,CENTER
05/05/92
05/05/92
05/05/92
05/05/92
05/05/92
05105/92
05/05R2
PRINTING COSTS;COMLCENTER
PRINTING CDSTS;COMM.CENTER
PRINTING COSTB;COMM.CENTER
PRINTINS COSTS;COMM.CENTER
PRINTING CDSTS)CO,~LCENTER
PRINTING COSTS;COMM.CENTER
PRINTING COSTS;COMM.CENTER
%.72 0.00 %.72
!1.91 0.00 !!.9!
30.25 0.00 30.25
71.95 0,00 71.95
6.25 0.00
56.96 O,O0 5~.96
19.50 0.00 19.50
100.75 0.00 100.75
2!.12 0.00 2!.12
150.20 0.00 130,20
19.50 0.00 19.50
8.49 0.00 8.49
I0.2~ 0.00 !0.24
5LOB 0.00 33.09
26.6! 0.00 26.6!
Check Totals: k
00010548 06/19/92 PAJLEY PABLEY EQUIPMENT RENTAL
202052 05128/~2 11663 05128192 4 DAY RENTAL;PUBLiC WORKS
f Check Totals:
00010549 06/I?/92 PERSRETi PEAS EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT
061692 06/16/~2 06/16/92 PAYEXT/PYRL jUNE I~.92
2PEAR.80 06/18/92 06/!8/~2 Nor{at P/R, 6/18/92
526.77 0.00 526.77
943.15 0,00 943.15
943.15 0.00 945.!5
!2,8~2.17 0.00 !2,8~2.17
25~.!7 0.00 25~.17
RAN-CAL JAMTGRiAL ~""=';"
r
06/09/92 1~:~' n-~/~o.
[:beck T,stai~: 13,085.34 0.00
- .
~AS" R:T~:L FP,-'- Cil:' E.):PLDY
,, , ........ 372.~1 0.00
C~SE c==,~: CiTT Ef~FiDYEEE o-~ n- ,
Check T:ta:s: 595.48 .....
OPEN ,-~n, ....,T~'n s'~ ~7 ,', An
Invc:ce Dat~ PIC Data
5276 06109/92 11565 0412q/92
OPEN ACCDUNT;TCSD ..... ," 0"' 7Z.ic
Check Totals: YT.4E 0.00 97,~
00010552 06!1~/92 RANCHWTR RANCHO WATER
i10505~52K 06110/92 06/10192 0110505852/42'15-5114 87.4; 0.0"j ~T.4Z
1!050~852~ 05/15R2 05/!~/~2 0!!05059521 5/15-4115 50.55 0.00 5~.5~
110505842K 06110/92 04/10/92 0110505842/4/15-5114 141.75 0.00 161.75
I10505842J 0511~192 05/15R2 011050~D421 ~I17-4115 45.75 0.00 45.78
1117000~2[ 06/10R2 06/10R2 0111700092/4/16-5118 94.5~ 0.00 94.5~
1!1702502K 06/10/~2 06/10/92 0111702502/4/16-5/18 252.15 O.OO 252.15
1!5200002~ 06/10/92 06/10/~2 0115200002/4/16-5/18 50.49 0.00 50.49
11520002~ 05113R2 05/13R2 011~200002I 5/IS-4/16 46.70 0.00 46.70
00010553 06119/~2 RAPECRIS RAPE CRISIS CENTER
061692 06116192 06/!6R2
Check Totals: 787.22 0.00 757.22
CDBS SUBRECiPIENT 1,000.05 0.00 1,000.05
00010554 06119/92 SANDIEGP SAN DIEGO PADRES
060492 06104192
06104/92
Check Totals: 1,000.05 0.00 !,000.05
TEMECULA TEENS 60.00 0.00 60.00
00010555 06!!9/92 SECURITY SECURITY PACIFIC NATIONAL
2001~26201 06~04~92 06104/92
20010872SN 06/04192 06104/92
Check lDtais: 6¢.00 0.00 60.00
BAN
4798020000014262/ST 518192 153.95 0.00 15S.95
479B020000010872/SN 20.16 0.00 20.!6
00010556 06!19/92 SHELFMAS SHELF MASTER
055055 05114/92 05/14192
900209 05/22/92 05/22/92
Check lntals: 159.1! 0.00 159.11
FBSO/STSSC 57.92 0.00
FBI5/STS!5 36.14- 0.00 36.14-
00010557 06/19/92 SIMMONS
060292
BECKY MCLEAN SIMMONS
06102/92 11157 II127/~I
Check Totals: 21.78 0.00 21.78
I20991/121091 BSO.O0 0.00 850.00
00010558 05119192 SiRSPEED SIR SPEEDY
524~ 0512B/92 11648
051261~2
Che:k Totals:
PREPRINTED WINDOWED ENVELOPES
gSO.O0 0.00 S50.00
656.04 0.00 656.04
Check Totals: k
00010559 06119/92 SD CAL-2 SO.CALIFORNIA TELEPHONE CO.
5456005K 06t05!92 0610~I92 71~5456005/(129-512~
5457418K 06108/92 06/08192 7145457415/412%5f29
~457425K 06/08/92 06/08/92 714~457425/4/29-5/29
2924020SK 06/05/92 06/09192 7142924020/5/1-5/29
287499~SN 06!05/92 06108/92 71425749~4//oq-5/oB
4 ....
656.04 O.O0 656.04
272.12 0.00 272.~2
75.92 0.00 75.92
68.85 0.00 6B.B5
74.70 O.OO 74.70
~2.~2 0.00 52.B2
00010560 06/19/92 STATE
061~92
STATE CDNTRDLLER'S OFFICE
Check Totals: 542.39 0.00 542.59
FEE AUDIT ,~n,,:,~..,T.n~, ...~,+ !n( ,f~('. r~ nn ,r,,, ,,r,
l(+{:. 00 C;, 30 ?,(:.
5,072.~7 0.00 5.072.57
290.06 9.05 29{:,06
S~KST.78 05/~i/92
............. o,~ SvSF.~r SYaTEH 2f90
IZ21~7 05/20/92 11592
Check IotaIs:
04/26/92 NAEPLATES & LOP~
2,86~.I? C.O('
~,~v,,,, ~ ~" E.ICl"
~ n- D.OC
O00105&l 06119192 TARBET TARGET STORE
061592 0alt5/92
0615~2! 06/!5/92
Check Totals:
06/15/q2 ~DH~Y HE SUPPLIES
06115192 AQUATIC/EQUIP SWIH PROBRAH
50,03 O.O0 .50.03
40.00 O.O0 49.00
200.00 0.00 200.00
Check TotalS:
00010564 06/19192 THORSBOR AMCIA THORSBORNE
0612~2 06/12/92 06/12/~2 HILEASE
) Check Totaim:
000105~5 06/19/~2 UNITOS UNiTOB RENTAL
S772~?0612 06/(2/92 1!180 12/13/9! UNIFORM RENIALS;CD~LSERVICE
00010566 06/19/~2 UNU~
Check Totals:
UN~ LIFE INS. CO. OF AME~ICA
06/12/92 06/09/92 INS. PRE~/JUNE
240,00 0,00 240.00
7.56 0,00 7,56
7.56 0.00 7.55
12.50 0.00 12.5~
12.50 0.00 '~ 50
2 0?c ~ ~,O0 2.075.27
00010567 06/19!92 USCM "q~
2PTRT.80 06/iS/92
?PT~v 8n 06/19192
Check Totals:
06/!8/92 NorE~! P/R, 6I!8/92
06/18/92 Norma! P/R~ 6/IB/~2
2,075.27 0.00 2,07~.27
5n~ 77 ~ Do 30i.77
301.77 0.00 ~01.77
00010568 06/19/92 WESTPUB
'c60292
Check Totals:
WEST PUBLISHING COHPANY
06102/92 06102/92 PU~LICATIOXS 4/2%5/27
605.54 0.00 605.54
q3,~fi 0.00 o- nr,
Check Totals:
00010569 07/!4192 MCTiGHEJ JOHN NCTIGHE & ASSOCIATES
920503 05/28/92 02% 05/01/~2 STUDY FO~ COST RECOVERY PRO6.
~2050~CR 05/28/92 0296 05/01/~2 CR MEMO/FINAL USER FEE RPT
~3.20 0.00 S.20
5,475.00 O.O0 5.475.00
2,550.00- 0.00 2.550.00-
00010570 07114192 RIVERSIO RIVERSIDE OFFICE SUPPLY
1075~5-I 04/23192 11517
I07585-2 04I~0/92 11517
107585-0 04122R2 11517
1¢7aI-0 04/22/92 11517
08664-0 05119/92 11611
108718-8 0i/0!/92
Check Totals:
04t09/92 OFFICE SUPPLIES; S~CK
04/09!92 OFFICE SUPPLIES; STOCK
04/09/92 OFFICE SUPPLIES; STOCK
O4/09/92 OFFICE SUPPLIES; STOCK
05/12/~2 LASER LABELS;NUmBErS;BINDERS
O. OFFICE SIJPPLIES/!0/8/?I
,'/01/92
2,925.00 0.00 o o~ O0
1.99 0,00 1.99
4.29 0.00 4.29
658.09 0.00 638,09
56.64 0.00 56,64
408.35 O.OO 408.~5
o~ 0% 0.0n o~ o~
00010571 07/14/92 WILLDAN
Check Totals:
WiLLDAN ASSOCIATES
05125/~2 r,=,~,q- REH:'ERED APR
~ ..... : SERVICES 72
1,206.27 O,OO 1,20&.27
16 P~.04 0.00 16.851.04
CheCk
79,tS5.2: 5,75
........ ' ..................... TE~='.SE::%i. ~/E 5.';O~F:C4~;:E
O(l 0'301051! 0~/!c,'/92 A."-F'LE ONE ....
001 nqrH,,c,~, r.~..'.i.~,: ~,.,-r-~ .., ......
~u.w~ ,~ ,-.~:, U~:ru~H RU:Z' RENTAL? THRU :UKE ~2' -:
00! 00{"1C522 0:.7!9;c.:2 CALiF'ORNIA~, : F'UgL.LSL NTC:PLAN.::r.,E~::::J~C- :7:.:
OOi 00010524 0~-'..;~'' CITY n.- SUN.t~YVALE PUNCH. "n~y mp Dnr.
00! 0001052~ 06/I~t0`2 COLONIAL LiFE & AD:IDENT INBUR PERMIUM; JUNE 92
00! 00010527 Oe/!g/g2 COPY LINE CORPORATION SERVICE CALLS; COP!ER~
001 00010528 0611g/g2 COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER DEPT FISH/BANE FEES EA-iO
001 000105.',0 06/lW92 DAVLIN AUDIO PROD.I~TBS; MAY 29-0`2 '.::: .:
00t 00010551 06/17I~2 DENTICARE OF CALIFORNIA INCUR PREMIUM/ ~UNE 72
001 000105~2 06/!9R2 FEDERAL EXPRESS 4-672-26152/.I12i,II.14~5 1:..'.:,
001 00010534 0611W72 SOVT FINANCE O~FICERS ASSOC. PUNCH OF BARD PRNOUNC & LINKS
001 000105~5 06/19t92 BLENN!ES OFFICE PRODUCTS PODIUM FOR CONF. ROOM:CiTY HL
001 000105~6 C.6/10`I~2 BODEN STATE TRADINB'CO. 4~B Si~MS -~--
001 00010537 06/1W~2 BRAFFiT! REMOVAL SERVICES BRAFF!TI REMOVAL;CiTY ~F
001 000!0555 06/:~/~2 ~.R.E.A.T. TRUST PREMIUMS/:.UNE ?2
00! 000105~ O~/IW~2 HA;~ES CORP~R.:~T!ON ML'SR.FF ~ CRIME PREV.TAPES
001 000:05:0 OUI~/92 HEALTH CONNECT!O?~ DRUB IDENTIFICATION KiT
001 000105~5 06/1o/~ MART; Y ....CO;:E~ SERVICE
........ n ~ ., ~ COFFEE SERVICE 47.01
00! 00910548 0~/!?I~2 PA..EY EO'J!P.".ENT RENTAL 4 DAY RENTAL:PUBLiC ~ORKS
nO' 000105¢q r,k/ ..... PENS EMPLOYEES' ;'cT~RE";N,' PAYMENT/PYRL JUNE 1~,72
001 bnO~ns~ O~'t'~.~ec' PENS Rwi:'!~'v::~' RETI~E~'~ENT Normal ~':'
001 000105~9 06/19/72 PER.,.-: EMP nYE:~' ET!REMD;7 PAw~NTI:'w'~ aU?~E ~ o,:.
6¢! OOO~,O~r~ 0.'.,S1191~2 c,=~"~v
...... ' ......... CASH RE!MB. FOR CiTY ':~:'!
........ 372.42
001 .:O.u',::~ O~/lozo? c="UR~Tv PACIFIC NATIONAL ..... 47~80"'('00.rx'ff:2~'~I BT
.................. ~::.~=.
001 0001055~ O&,"~, SRELF ~ASTr= F~i5/STSI5 ~-.14
001 nOninS~A n~;,o:o~ SH=L; ~ASTEF: FBCO/
...... ~ .-.,
00! 00010557 06/!?/92 BECKY MCLEA!~ SIMMONS 120~,I/121091
00! 0001055? 0-A/10`/."2 SO.CALiFORNiA TELEPHONE CO. 7143456005/4/2:,-5/2~ 272.11
OOi 00010559 06/19/92 SO.CALIFORNIA TELEPHONE CO. 7143457425/4/29-5/29
n.,, o0r!I(56c r,~,~,:,o,, = .... CnNTRnLi E=' n=c,.-c ....
OCsl 09:!10561 06/I.~/72 STATE COMPENSATION INS. FUND Nor&a! P/R, 5/07/.02 40~.51
00i 00010561 06/19/92 STATE COMPENSATION INS. FUND Normal P/Fh 5/21/°,2 552.1
00i 00010551 06/19192 STATE COMPENSATION INS. FUND Normal P/R, 5!07F}2 75.54
001 000105&I 0&I19/92 STATE COMPENSATION INS. FUND N~rma! PIN. ~/c.~ .r'
001 00010561 ¢6/19/~2 STATE COMFE~{SATiON ~.N~ FUND Norr~al '>,'-':' 5/¢':'/c"' 42~.45
001 QOO~Oq.u 06/19/72 ST'TE '" ~;.c~ ........!N .
..... bO: .... ~,,.:~ui, S FUND Norlal P!R. 5/21/72 4g(~.72
001 00010551 06t19/92 STATE gOMPENSAT!ON INS. FUND Normal P/E, 5/07/92 272.79
'.,u~ 00010561 06/!9/92 STATE COMPENSATION INS. FUND Normal P/R, 5/2!/0,2
00! 00010551 06/19/92 STATE COMPENSATION INS. FUND ,.. Normal P/R~ 5/07/0,2
001 00010561 0~/19/0,2 STATE COMPENSATION INS. FUND Normal P/R, 5/2iI72 I~.24
001 000!05~I 06/1910,2 STATE COMPENSATION INS. FUND Normal P/R, 5!07/92 512.54
00t 00010561 06/!9R2 STATE COMPENSATION INS. FUND Normal P/R~ 5!21/92 6~.19
(10! 00010551 06/19172 STATE COMPENSAT!QN INS. ~U~", N,'.m-~ P/R, ~zO~';~':' 2!4.~
001 00010561 C, 6/19/92 STATE COMPENSATIO}~ INS. FUND Normal P/R. 5/2i/92 75.:4
001 000!(561 C~3/19/92 STATE COMPENSATION INS. FUND Norc, al P/R: 5/07/92 477.~i
00! 00010562 06/!':;/92 SYSTEM 2190 NAMEPLATES & COPY 50.~:
r..r..i00010564 06/19/92 ALICIA THO:'.SBCRNE ~' =AGe 7.5!
'.:-~:=.'=- UNUM LIFE ~,:c. C,9. nF ~MEF::CA iNS. ;,:.cM: .~.;!~.~.- ....
...... · ...........=~ i~-j,~...:.
""' .- ....... ~:-.::r,~;,3 CO~:.-'~.r~': ~'[jEr lC~:~n"':S 4-'2%5,'2~ :~"
C:::::':':!:':C'5-E~'C'-7'24/72 ::]>,'~: ~':ZTZ'2~E :i .::~E':ZE'::TE? C": )ZEt:C"FE%.L L':EF: FEE ::FT :..:~':..'.
i:'{:i(i0S:')56~ C"Z;"C: Z'C:E' ~.:TZ'2-~E E: :::-ZE':C:A"EE' -Z':."2'." .-':F :ZE7 F:E:~!.'EF:':' ,"'F:Z". .-..:....
r,.'. 0')::1'057(> (}7,'1:/92 Rl"':"" ....
.... ,=..o..:: C".:E ........... S!jPF'~iES:
.... ~ .... .2 .'..." ; ^"""' ~ .'2,'%':; C',P'IH*~P:':· '."*""'".'
6C:! 09CC(:576 C:7."14/:,2 F'IVERSiDE C':FZCE S:j;'PL'~ r-':'T~: c,':: '::. ~.',-; . :.
0j010570 07/i4i92
000!¢570 07/!4!72
00010571 07/t4/72
014 00010555
~!6 00010455 06/12/92
019 00010485 06112/V2
019 00010517
019 00010518 06/!9192
0'~ 00010519
&m
019 00010520
019 00010525
017 00010525 0~I!g/92
617 00010526
0!9 0001052g
019 00010550 06!19192
019 00010531 06119/92
019 000105Z5
CI? 0001055~
019 00010538
019 00010541
0!~ 00010542
0!9 00010545
017 00010544
.~ 0001054?
019 00010550
019 00010551
019 00010552
019 00010552 06/!9/92
017 00010552
0!~ 00010552
0!9 00010552
017 00010~
0!9 00010552
019 00010552 0~/19/~2
017 0001055~
019 00010555
019 000!055S 06/i9/92
0!9 00010559
019 000i055S 06/lW92
0!~ 000!055~
~o 00010%! 06/19/92
0!9 00010561 66/!?/~2
0!9 00010561
3!~ 000105SI 06/19/92
('!9 0(~0105~3 06/IW92
rio f~AAIA~:~
0,,ic (!(,':,I~5=!
VE~:DO~: hA~E
RiVERBIDE OFFICE SUPRLY
RIVERSIDE FFICE SUPPL~'
WiLLDAN ASSOCIATES
RAPE CRISIS CENTER
FIELDNAN; ROLAPP & ASSOCIATES
FIELDMAN; ROLAPP & ASSOCIATES
ARTEStA IMPLE.",ENT
COUNTY ASSESSOR
AVP VISION PLAN
CADDY GRAPHICS
CAMPBELLS LIGHTING, Si~NIELEC
ROBERT A, COFFMAN
COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDENT
OULIE CROWE
DAVLIN
DENTICARE OF CALIFORNIA
FIRST IMPRESSIONS
~ ....r..,~. ,. TRUST
DEE HILLIN
DONNA HOFSTER
HORIZON WATE~
JOHNSON. SHARON
LORRI ANN MCSAVRAN
PERS E,".,"'LOYEES' RETIREHENT
PETTY CASH
RAN-CAL ~ANiTORiAL SUPPLY
RANCHO WATER
RANCHO WATER
RANCHO WATER
RANCHO WATER
RANCHO WATER
RANCHO WATER
RANCHO WATER
RANCHO WATER
SAN DIE80 PAOP. ES
SECURITY PACiFiC NATIONAL BAN
SIR SPEEDY
SO,CALIFORNiA TELEPHONE CO,
SO,CALIFORNIA TELEPHONE CO.
SO.CALIFORNIA TELEPHONE CO,
STATE COMPENSATION ~N~ FUND
STATE COHPENSATION ~Nc FUND
STATE COMPENSATION INS, FUND
STATE COHPENSATION INS. FUND
~, .....STORE
TARGET STGF:E
~JSCh
OFFiLL SUF'F'LiES/>:'E i:
CFF:ZE EU;'F':ZEE:
SERViCEE-F:ENiERED AR~ V:
COBB SUBRECIPiENT
FINANCIAL ADVISOR;BOND STUDY
FINANCIAL ADVISOR;BOND STUDY
EMERSENCY TIRE REPAIR
ASSESSOR NAP COPIES ~I18 5/i~
INSURANCE PREM/JUNE 92
ART WORK FOR DAY CAMP SHIRTS
REPLACE LAMPS-BALLAST:OLD T~N
SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND
INSUR PERMiUN! JUNE 92
~ILEABE
AUDIO PRO.;PARKS & REC. 618
INSUR PREMIUM/JUNE 72
PULLOVER SWEATSHIRTS:ARTWORK
~OUSE:~!CROBOFT TYPE
~=N~UN=z JUNE o~
TRAVEL EXPENSES~ APRIL 92
SUPPLIES/~UMM=R DAY CA
~AY SERVICE
NILEAGE 5/!-6/i
M!LEAGE/PSQTOS
PAYMENT/PYRL JUNE 18~92
CASH REINS, CiTY EMPLOYEES
O~q' ACOOUNT.TC~n
0!I05~38:2/4/15-5/!4
0102000021 4/16-5/IS
0110505842/5/17-4/15
0115200002f 5/18-~f16
0111702502/4/1~-5/18
0110505852/4/15-5/!4
0110505S52/5'~3-4
0111700092/4/1~-5/18
TEMECULA TEENS
4798020000010872i SN
PREPRINTE~ WINDOWED ENVELOPES
7142874994/4/29-5/27
7145457418/4/29-5/29
7142~24020/
Normal PIR, 5/2!/92
Normal ~R 5/07/92
Normal PIR~ 5/21/72
Nor~i! P/R. 5/07/?2
~oMvy ~c BUDpL!E~
:;,/. F'RE>!"
....
~: ....,,1;
i. OOQ. !: 5
4,50Q. O{
4,500.0{
6q. CC
14.sc
12Q.c,:
%H.2c.
33.0C
IZO.O{
'~n,C~
iEO.O<
?.6~
59.2:
I0~.92
9&.TZ
2,58~.2~
50.49
4~.78
87.4~
~0 ~
20~ I~
656.04
52.82
7~,92
74,70
807.6~
2C{,.{2
12.~C
029 00010547 0~t!9192 OCB REPBOSR~PHICS, INC. ~RINTING COSTS:COM~.~E~TE~: ~::."
7C: ....2-
0e/Z:."?" F_sbR:T>' '=-'m;;,WV~ ;'AZIFI'Z ~ ....
r',:",'T-",', ,"d-:~":,"':" 0b/ZE/~2 :-*,.-'~n~ 1!:I0-01
,
1454 (:(,/~bn,/~2 11667 O/~t~,}8~2-{-ABOR-HAT-rC-IRC-I--BRKRStSAM-H
124,779.0C' C.C< ~'_' "..: r,,'
12-'.~77~ rr: (:.0: ""' 77:,.0(
C~.~!~.J~-66Y~6tqC~-BENEHT--BENEFIT-~qMERICA
061892 06/18192
C~eck Totals:
06/18!92 MED.REIMB/DEPD CARE 5/27%110
2?0,00 0.00 290,00
I~881,94 0.00 !.881,94
~hec~--Tot~Fs;
00010576 06/26/92 HICKNELL BIC[NELL TRAVEL CENTE~
062292 06/~'~ 06/22/~2 AIR TIC[E~IMAINSTREET CONF,
216.00 0.00 216.00
2!6,00 f;,Ocj 218,0'.)
--i9,00 ............ 0.00 ...........19,00 --
Check Totals:
-tO010578-06t26/92-~A,~ASSLE-CA~FORNIA-ASSOC!AIION-OF
061892 0~I~8/92 0~!!81~2 HOTEL RM/BOARD RETREAT
19.00 0.00 19,00
~n~,O0 0.00 202,00
"- , --'Cneck-Totais: ....
00010579 06/26192 CALiFLAN CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE
308511116 051!4!92 11603 05114192 EXTRA WORK ORDERE;SLOPE%ETC
"' Check Totals:
0~..~580 0a!26/92 C!TICORP CIHCORP NORTH AMERICA
,~i~6~7 C~f~tg~04tS
202.00 .... 0.00 202.00
116.00 0.00 lla.O0
i16.00 0.00 116.00
O~OI-/~?-~,UNEi-E. ASE-PAYMENT;PHONE-SYS~-----iT427T57 0.~0 ...... 17429:57
Check Totals:
=gO.~I-~.~5811~7'2~yg~I-T~I~I'ly-OF-O. ANyON-tAKE
0~j2592 06/23192 06/23192 CONFERENCE JULY 8'92
· s,~i ~/ 0,00 427.57
20,00 0,00 20,00
000!n~8~ 06t26192 nneTrn
062292A
COSTCO WHOLESALE
Ob'~zD~
Check-Totals: ...................
06t22/92 SUPPLIES BAY CAMP 2NO SESSION
--20.00 ...... 0;00 ....... 20,00 .....
170,00 0,00 170,00
Chec~ Totals:
00010583 06126192 BAVL!N DA~LIN
89-2~BI--O&-l~I/9211~92 ..... 05tOii92-MAY-JUNEiE~ICES;P~ANNtNG'
89-23:!8B 0~/02/02 11692 0~/01/92 MAY-JUNE SERVICES;PLANNINB
Z'-- ....... L .................... -Check' lot~t;: .............
000105~; %/26/?2 OEPT,OF DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER
062292 06/22/92 06/22t92 LICENSE RENEWAL FOR CPA
Check
:'00!05~5 n;y~;/c~ ~n .... n~n nnNA~ n~n~ T,~.-
0~1~92 0S119192 06/18/92 FLAT TIRE REF'AIF:
170.00
140.00
1~5.80
275;90
200,00
200.00
:~.2~
0.00 170.00
"O~JO 140.00 ~ ---
0,00 I~5.80
· " 0.00 ....... 2?5;80
0.00 200.00
0.00 200.00
0,00 E5,2~.
: >5.'2..;- 0~/2,.,::92 FE['ERP, LE FEDERAL EXPREE~ · "i. 79C27-~E 06.,1:%~92
C':--':? TCZELE|
06/15/92 F'['ETAGE ~ F'ACKAr-ZN~
lOTiS {"6~12/'~2 ll.~ll 05/0!:92 JR FiRE DEPT.SIiCi::-'DN
Check
~u uQ , ---~:~H~ GEOTECHNiCAL ~
18ql
9~/C5/72-02~9 I~LO2.'~i-ENViRO,NIIN~L-ASSESSMNT;RIVERTN ..... 420.00-- ..
08105/92 0269 10102191ENVIRONMNTL ASSESSMNT:RIVERTN 1~5.00
O.O(!
O.OC
0.00 42Q-,-~ .....
0.00 IiLCO
00010589 06126192 GLENNIS 6LENNIES OFFICE PRODUCTS
111703-0 05/1!/92 11673
I1~1=0 OaJ-O~241&14 ..
1!645!-I 0&/04/92 11514
117354-0 06105192 11514
Chec~:-iot~,-ls: 555,00
05101192 MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 128,36
05~7-~-2-f, LE~ER;TIS~E4ROLODEX~EFtLL 12lJi
04/17/92 MISC,IIEMS;OPEN ACCOUNI 5.17
0~/17/92 MISC,ITE,~S)tPEN ACCOUNT 53.53
Check Tota1~: 30~.97
O001OS~O 06/261~2 GOLDENST GOLDEN STATE v ~,,~ .....
' ,R,uz.~= C~,
.1511)~
06~6~92-i18~! 06AII!-?2-ADDED-MEMORY;LASERJET-FRiNTER .......... 4A2~2
O.OO l.n'__?l .......
0,00 5,17
0,00 55.55
O.O0 508.97
442 ~2
---Q(~59'!-4&/~5/92--JDBSAVPt~-~OB~AVAILABLE ....
212076 06/!5/~2
Check Totals: 442.~2
02/14192 OPEN ACCOUNT FOR ADS;HU,RES. 67.60
0,00 442.92
n.OO 6' ~n
Check-Totals:
00010592 06/26/92 jRFREEHA J, F:, FREEMAN CO.,
43741 06/!B/92 I1682 06104192 TYPEWR!IER FOR TCBD
Check Totals=
00010593 08/26/92 LAKESREG LAKE BRE6DRY
0~2~-92 ~/22/~2 <~I~24-~2-4EN~)uREEj-I~AY4AMPERS---
67-,80.-- 0.00
524.74 0.00
524.74 O,OO
600,00
--S7..~0 ...........
524.74
524.'~'
600,00
0617~2
Check Totals:
LEA~-OF-CALIR-(;RtES
06117192 06117192 JOHN MEYER REVITAL,CONFERENCE
600,00 0,00 600,00
170,00 0,00 170,00
-- ~eck--T-otai~:
00010595 06126192 LONGSDRU LONGS DRUGS
4718 06/18/92 11488 04/02/92 FILM PRINTING ACCDUNT)TCSD
Check Totals: ,.
00010B96 06/26/92 LUNCH&ST LUNC~ & STUFF CATERING
.170,00 O,OO l~,O0
!8,07, 0,00 !&,07
16,07 0.00 16,07
420,00 O,O0 420,0~
'O00!0597-06/26t92-MARILYNS-MARILYN'S COFFEE SERVICE
2!80 06122Iq2 11847 05101/92
Check Totals: 420.00 0.00 420.00
COFFEE SERVICE 149,52 0,00 149,52
00010598 06i26t92 MBMASSOC MG~ ASSOCIATES
F'TE~2.005 05/2~/~2
~Tc.~nr~r 05/2~/92
05/29/92
05/2?/92
Check-Totals: ................ t49,52 .....
PLAN F':uf:N *:m', ..... ~ 4~
CR MEMO PER BU!LDiNG/BAFTEY 1.20-
0,00 --
0.00
O.GO
149,52-
77q,4~
Invoice D~te P/G
,'-:ZZ',Y;
0~0600 00/26/?? OC~EPRO OCB RE~ROGRAPHiSS. INC.
..... 40709~---~!1-2/92-11586 ..... 05/05/92~PRINTING CQSTS:CQMM.CENTER
4094Z! 0S/17/92 I158~ 05~C5/72 PRINTING COST~.CO,~i~.CENTE5
410lie 0o/17/92 11586 05/05/92 PRINTING COSI~;COM~.CENIER
4eerie 06117/72 11586 05!e5/92 ~R{NHNC,-C~S~SI-C.,-3MM.-CENTER
410080 0~/17/92 11586 05/05/92 PRINTING COSTS;COMM.CENTER
53.5! 'C.O{. S3,5:
32.63 i'~ 00 "' ~5
16.8i O.O0 I~.81
00010601 05/26/92 PA~TYREN PA~TY RENTALB~ INC.
062292 06/22/92 06/22192 PUBLIC SAFETY PICNIC
00010602 06/26192 PETROLAN PEdROLANE
441612 .....06/ti9t92-I~94
4416Z 06!19192 10995
441611 06/19/92 i099~
00010603 06126i92 PLANNING THE PLANNING CENTER
!-7-7767 .3~30
!49.50 0.00
Check Totals: 149.30 0.00
Ie/2!!91-FUEL--INOPANEt-B&S-TRUCK ............ !75.55 ......... 0.00
!0/2!/91 FUEL (PROPANE) TCSD TRUCE !9.27 0.00
~, h ~ (PROPANE) T~SD TRUCK 89.41 Fj. Of)
CheCk Totals: 282.0! 0.00
.... 290.66 ...... 0.00
149.30
4mQ ~1
282,01
..... 290.6~ ........
'~)OiO~04~36~2~ig?P~!Y~AST-POSiMASTER-
053092 05/50!92
Check Totals: 290.66
05/30/92 POSTAGE/PACKAGING !!5.55
0r"'~605 06/26792 RANCHOBL RANCHG BLUEPRINT
3%0E 04/01/92
42254 06~i~7%-!'!500
%~.~ 06!18/92 ' ....
Check-Totals: ..... i15.55
04/01/72 PRINTS illOil 475.18
02XI!~92'BLUEPRINTS;-ENGtNEERING-~EpT.- ....... 95.55
05/25/92 MAPPING SUPPLIES &BLUPRINTG 43.45
0.00
0.00
..... 0.00
0.00
--0,-00 --
0.00
290.66
!15.55
475.18
~ 4~
Check-Totals:
00010607 06/28/92 RANCHWTR RANGHO WATER
0i117000~2 05/13/92 05/13/92 03/17-04/16
~ ......... 05tI~t92 ........ 051!3/92-03ti~-04f16
0111704051 05/13/92 05/13!92 03/17-04/!6
0107600781 05/06/92 05/0~/92 05/12-04/!0
.... 0107~00771~'j5~0~92 ........ 05/~6/92 05/12-04/i0 ............................ 5~06
'61Z14 ..... O.iO
12iO0090CR 05/~0/~~
i1500t0!CR 05/20/92
!2400752CR-05t20t92'
12400600CR 05/20R2
0104630852 06i0~R2
............. 01040!0592"06/03/92
n~7OO0~ 06/25192
0115001012 06/17/92
tI!704052--0~/!0/92
1117000521 06/10/92
0!1!7000!2 0U~0/72
9108007~2 0~/05/92
.-- OiI6C::::! 06/17/92
0i24000152 0:/17i92
C131Z::012
912~0~322 0c/17/92
910Y:}0752 01/95/92
05/20/92 0124000902CR/3/25'4/24
05120/92 01150010!2CR/5/25-4121
t5/20/92i!24007322CR/5/25-4/24 ......
05/201V2 0!240060020R/3125-4/24
06/0~/72 04/05/92-05/08/92
06/03/12 04/08/~2-05/08/q2
06/25/12 04/16/72-05/IB/~2
06/17/72 04/21/02-05/21/~2
0~/10R2-04/16/-05/18 .....
06/I0/~2 04/16-05/!?
06/!0/92 04/16-05/!B
06/05/92 04/14-05/15
36/17/97 04/2:-05/27
9&'17/72 0~.'21-0~.'21
i' A / i ~ i~ · ~ :?~-0~ ~= ·
6!2rt4 '
430.78- 0,00 430.78-
568.45- 0.00 568.45-
· '131';62 ............0.00 131--6o-
112.29- O.OO 112.29-
131.74 0.00 151.74
10 TM 0.00 0 u---
~.,o 0.00 95.46
496.45 0.00 4%.45
76.12 '- 0.00 76.12 .......
56.0S '::, '}':' ~5~, OE
9~.SS ,'. ,',r, ~'S :~
271.~? }.,)::~ 271.97
T:, '~":! :'. ':":' T:. C '}
0;00-------'500;06 ........
410.66- 0.00 4!0.66-
45!;98- 0;00-- 451;98.--
193.59- 0.00 195.59-
418.95- 0.00 418.95-
:ZlZ£. :~.-S', . _ LF, aZ! ~',EZIEZ_=' iZ-'-Z;Z'.; 77::
1':IC4O~08S2 06i03/92 "" "' ......04i08-05/08 ~: ~
........ ~O~v.~/7~ 0 0A '~': ::'
- c , ~ U4/Z~-OSIZ; ~ O.OO
,'l,~,n,. ..........,-,~ 06/!7/92 04/24-05,'27 " .... .00 &0.25
107600781A 0905/92 06t05192 04!10-5/12 : ~52.18 0.00 352.iS
I07~007q-1~2 0610U~2-0~/10-051-12 221,~5 9.0~ 22!.7; --, ......
0102450002 06/03/92 06/05/~2 04/07-05/07 554.57 0.00 154.57
ghec4--T~tai~:
00010608 06/2~/92 R!VERSLU RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT
87804 06/18/92 11557 04/14/92 CUTTING BASE:BOX!ACETATE
000!0609 0612~/92 ROMERO ROMERO, LUCI
(~5-2~92 r~/2U?2
Check Totals:
O~/~-U~2~tL~AE-~I~8~RSEMENT
80&,-l~ 0,00 S0645 ....
126,02 ~.00 126.02
1%.02 0.00 126.02
-1~8,88 0,00 No oo
-O0010610~36126t92-ROWDEN--RACHEL-ROWDEN--
061992 06119192
Check Totals: !38.88
06/191~2 CLAIM SETTLEMENT/J0026 ~.81
0,00 ~
00010~!! 06/26/92 SAV-ON
062292
Check'Totals:-
SAY-ON DRUG STORE
06122192 06/22/92 SUPPLIES FOR SUMMER DAYCAMP
00010612 06/2~I92 SCOTT'S
-4362292-----%/22/~2 ....
SCOTT'S MEATS
Check Totals:
06122/92 PUBLIC-SAFETY-PICNIC .......... 348.00-
532.8t 6.00
!00.00 0.00
100.00 0.00
..... 0.00--
Check Totals:
--'.)OOi~->06/q~-I-'.~CUR4~SECURI-T~-PAC~F~C-NATqONAL-~N
200001082~ 0~/04/92 06i04/~2 4798020000010823/KL
0200000107 0~/04/92 06/04f92 4798020000010773/DD
00010614 06/26/92 SHELFMAS SHELF MASTER
¢55;41- Q6;I~92--11698
Check Totals:
~I42/12-SHELVING~NIIBIDEAD-STORABE--
-,~ n 0.00
55.2! 0.00
!64.00 0.00
219.21 0.00
~79,89. O.O0
100.0¢
100,00
j48,40
348.0~
55.21
1~4.00
219.21
57-9,89---
000106!5-06!26/92-SIRSPEED SIR-SPEEDY---
5319 0~122192 10928
Check Totals: 579.89 0.00
10/02/9! BUS.CARDS FOR NEW E~LDYEES 28.77 O,O0
37%89
28.77
--.Check-Totals: .................... 28.77
0001061~ 0~/2~/92 S~ART&FI SMART & FINAL
062292 0~/22/92 06/22/92 CONDEMENTS SHERRIFS PICNIC
Check Totals:
~0010617 06/26/92 SO CAL-2 SO,CALIFORNIA TELEPHONE CO,
......... J458550K---O~/2&/92--.
5493457K
8" 10
o,.10
06t26/92-7147458550/--4i30-5/28 .............. 60.79
06/2~/92 n6/O~'~ "'~"~ .... 4/29-/21
--.0,00 28,77
0.00 87,10
0.00 87.!0
...... 0,00 ........ 60,79
0.00 55.09
Check Totals:
."2":10~-1° 0~/26/9':' S~CAEr:ST S~UTHERN ~,h~ir.
43077&%C '7::.:'¢1 .'72 :1:5/"2: ."?Z ':>:/:l -01 ."TC'
45877650(:2 (,:/,:'i/~2 00/01/92
.............. ~ ....... ~ '.,~,' :_ ('.:.'3C'-'::~.'3:
':3,5~ :;. O0 ~3.5S-..
27.~6 0.00 27.,
.c e~ 9 ,,r., iS.'?8
l~.~? :,3(' !9.98
.... :' nr, 22,17
43(,T'5'.,Z'~ (:,:/01/gZ
43(;7757..-'.2 0:;'01.;9":
4,3C77=,,2e.~
,,n--:~:.= g: 0i'72
4307751b0 06tQl/92
45077515? 06101192
450775157 06/00!i92
43077510~ 06/.01/92
~507751C!
45077!38~ 06/01/92
4~0771466 06/Q1/92
---45077!465---0610i.t92--
430771467 06/01192
0.:,";~:/?"
00/9!/'-'.2
.,-},./ritz{?
08/0i/92 4/50-=j7-,i :
06/01/92 4/50-5/~I
06/01/92 019-191-~99-42-5500
99.
2:.55
e. ",~ :'
2~.93
25'.i7
.29
06!01!92 04/50-0515i
0610i/92 04150-05/5!
06/01/~2 04/50-05/51
06/0!/92 04/50-05/5~
06~I/92-04/50-05/51
06/01/92 04150-05/51
29d-~
27.94
27~81
14.5~
--2629 .............
15.42 0, O0
:. 0 ( '-'- :. 4:
{. 0 (' 2 :...:: 5
0.0<. - 2 ,-.
,] .0(; 2: .'-7:
C. 0(: 2:'. l '
0.00 27.77
(;..~¢' 29.-!-V ......
0.00 27.94
0.00
0.00 27,-r81--
O. O0 26.56
0.00 i4.56
-26r79 ....
0001062.5 06/%!92 SOUIHCED SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
Chez~-t:tal~: ..................... 666;45
604117670 06/16192 06i16/92 05111192-06110192
45!2~OStXt-OS!O9/92 ..... 06/09192"0510~/92-06/0~t92 .........
604!!i0~ 06/16/92 06/!6t92 05tlI1~2-0~I10i92
5.58151120 06t05/92 06/05!~2 04/50/92-061011~2
558061~II--96KJ5~92 06t05/92-04i30f92-06t0!'192"
567551~75 06/~0/92 06/10/92 05/05/92-06/05/92
51~05~001 06/05/92 06/05/92 04/28/92-05/28/92
59~!~008~'06!~5/~2 ............ 06715/92~5/07/92-0~/09/92
519051802 06/05/92 06/05/92 04/28/92-05/28/92
6%7~1651 05/29/?2 05/29/72 04/25/92-05/22/92
5~%~%~~ 06105f92-t)$fS!Y92~O~129/92
~29070201 0'10~I72 06i05!92
5290702001 06/0.5/-".2 06105192 0!150172-0~I02!92
~:0O ........ ~v45 .....
9.50 0.00
· " 9.00 ....... 0;00 ........... 9;00 "
9,50 0.00 c ~0
i ~94 ~: 1.094.57
.o .~, 0.00
......... 8,~2 --0.00 ........ 8.62 ....
52,91 0,00 52,9!
~ ~e 0 O0 252.19
.... ~ 0;00 ......... !9!."~6 ....
57 ~ 0.00 5~ ~'
lss:o9 ~.00 ies~9 , --
!80.95 cl 0n 1~n 9'
!94.0i 0.00 !94.01
52907~200A'O&Y05~92 ....... "06YO$192'I2/Sr!91~OIY30/92''
5290702003 06/03/~2
52907020004 06!005192
5290702~-06t05t92--
5675501~6 06/10/92
567550!Z~1 06110t92
5675501562'0611(~/92
567580!Z~3 06/10/~2
558001401 06/05192
06105/92 111~019!-12/51/91
06103192 !0/29t9!-tli50/?!
06t05/92-9t28191-10/29/91
06/10/92 02/05/92-05/06/92
06110/92 05105192-0610.5192
06/I0/92'04/06/92-~5/~5/92
06/10/92 05/06/72-04/06/92
0&/05/92 04/50/92-06/01/92
"'168,82 ........... 0;00 .... 168;82 ----
181,50 0,00 181,50
!82.84 O.00 182.84
...... 178;52 ........ ~);00 ......... t78,52 .....
202.24 0.00 202.24
!97.49 0.00 197.49
!97;70 '-0.00 ..... 197.70 --
217.62 0.00 217.62
529.52 0.00 ~29.52
5585080! 06i05/92 06/05/92 04129192-0512~192
55815~201 0M05/92 06/05/92 04105/92-06101/92
'604111095"'0~716192 ........... 06i!8/92'05/Ii192-06/I0/92-
551%7545 06/12/92
........ 551267%~"'06/09/92
~,~o~9 66/11/92
5778i387~2 %I11/92
57:i:!::Z: (:6,."Ii,'~2
t(:-:::l'::i
06't04f92"1)4129t92-05t~t92 .................. 185;09
0.-00 183;09 ......
!98.45 O. 00 198.
196.57 0.00 196.57
-- 9;58 ...... 0.00 ...... 9.58 .......
t 0.00 o .08
? .OB 0.00 ~ .08
18.77 --' 0~0(,-- -
9.00 0.00 ~.00
9.0 ) 0.00 9.00
9.50 0.00
~ -n (:.OO ?
':. 42 0.0 '::' :. 42
a.':;= , .:: _z-zzz'.~r.t
53800~,2T, i 0B,'35/72 0a/0:'/72 .(.4130:72-66101/~Z 5. ~0 :). 9C 9.
519055;%. 08,'08/S'2 06/08/~2 C.,,~,~; ..... ~;,;~ ';.00 n.:m ~ .....
~'?;~33;~ O; "' ~" ,'~ 'is/e2 05/0~/%-o.~Iowg2 ? .8o c. nr,
54~03 ~i~ g8~08~24St~11~2-0~i02~72 S'.GO O.OO
575S%802 06iU192 061U192 0510S192-0~1051~'2 ?.gO 0.00 5.00
51~050101 06/0~R2 08/0~/92 04/28/~2-05/281~2 &5.45 0.00
5~81S2104 0~/05/92 06/05/92 04/~0/~2-06/01/92 1~201.28 0.00 1.201.28
~'~ '~' n,' __ '. %00 I.~ZgL ·
Check I~tals~
---O0~I~2~-~)~26!~24PEED¥OI4PEED¥-OIL-CNANGE --
3A4n 06/16192 ~-~o ....
.... ~ 02104192 REPAIR & ~AI~T.rvvv VEHICLES
7~t,24.56 0.00 7,624.56
22.4'? 0
....
00010625 08/2~/72 THOMPSON THOMPSON PUBLISHING GROUP
02048227~ O~/OB/92 06t08!~2 FAIR LABOR HANDBOOK
Check Totals:
000!0~26 06/%172 U~ITOG UNITeS RENTAL SERVICE
~ 4~ ~.0~
!%.50 0,00 !%.50
I76.50 0.00 1%.50
ST-7-2~.~tS.4~.~IR2--II180--.-I21.i$1~I-UNIFOR~-RENTALS~CO~,SERVICE ...... 12,50 ........... 0,~;0 ...... 12,50 .......
877!570~!g 06t!9/~2 0~65 02/27/~2 UNIFORMS RENTAL!PUBLIC WORKS 12.50 O.O0 12.50
.............. Check-Totals: "= 0.00 2~.0~ ....
.................. ~.00 ............. , .
00010~27 06/26172 ZYLAB ZYLAB --.
0616~2 06/I~t~2 06ii~i92 TEXT RETRIEVAL SOFTWARE 108.56 O.O0 I0~.:
'Check Totals: 10B.36 O.OO !OB.3a
r,~,,t ....06125/72 ~nc-fi~
v DSTCO WHOLESALE
0622?2 061221~2 ........ --06/22;92-CONDE~ENTS/-SHERRIFS-HCNIC -325.75 ~.OO ~S '=
07978 0610~1~2
0617~2 06/171~2
Check Totals: ~= 7= 0.00
04/01172 PUBL,LGL NTC;PLAN.CO~;COUNCL 40.65 O.O0 40.65
04/0iI~2 PUBL~LGL NTC;PLAN.COHM!COUNCL 145.57 0.00 !45.59
04/01/~2 PUBL~LG~ NTC~PLAN.CD~COUNCL 60.02
0~/0~/~2 RECREATION BRDCHURE~ S,O~O.O0 0.00
................. Check-.lotals:--
00010630 07i!4/~2 6RAFF!Ti GRAFF!TI REMOVAL SERVICES
4565 04150/~2 0305
................... L__.rL ........ L .......
10/01!9! BRAFFtTI REI!OVAL;CITY OF TE,~,
Check Totals:
04/OI~92--ANEND.C3iI~CLEANINGiEEN CTR..
G2/!0192 3AiqITORIAL SERV.THRU ~UNE 72
5,316.26 0.00 --- LZ16.26 ....
~ ~Sn On O.O0 !.380.00
1.580.00 O.OO !.380.00
400.00 ....... 0,00- - 400,00 ....
(;::::/('i7~ ('7.:i::'~2 ~:~L::'ZZE "AURZZE ~R!NTEF? OUl::i::
2;357-i :1,~.:~8/c? 11:7~. ::!5,.C.i/:: ZO(, SODSEt CCVE~S:
~54'07/!4/~2 ~,UNEFiNA'MUN!-F!NANC!A~ ~{EViCES. [NC; ....
92471 C'5~i4/9Z 0555 04/i4/92 ...... UPDATE:LEVY ;v 91-95
00010655 07/14/92 N B S N B;S / LOWRY
RO52058jMB 0512~/72 0~97
00010536 07114/92 DLIVERBR DLIUER BROTHERS
C-rm. ck-;otais;
05/12/72 CDNSIR.MGMI.PW 9>04
Check iotais:
3~144.~0
36,i44.60
~SG6-----03~u.C~-AgC--S-iREEt~IORM~RAiNFiRFC~SiBNL---91-.~67~-il-
5.~-:.47 -:-,..,
9 .'Z5.47 ........... ~ ""'
· ~
~VV -
0.00 36,144.60
0.00
"T'
%6i!~I57{r~.+4~92-RAMTEK--' RAM~EK
4070 05/27/92
Check Totals4
05/0i/92 BIKE ROUTE REPA!RS:MAI)4T.
9!:7~7.11 0.00 91,767.11
!L495.3~ 0.00 18,495.35:
Cnec',K-lotais: ..............
000i0~38 07/14/92 RjMn~;TG RJM DccT~N ~ROHp INC.
i0110 06i1~/92 0345 01/15/~2 ~ESIGN DRAWINGS; REG.CTR PROJ
~i)IO7 O~ilO/~i31~ ...... nI~':~°~cSTGM'n~AWINGe-Dc~ ~Tp PROJ ......
i0i09 0a/I0)/92 0345 01/15/72 DESIGN DRAWINGS; REC.CTR PROj
00010639 n'/14192 SimMONS
0'1~92-i
0602~2-2
! .... Cneck'-Totais: ...........
BECK~ MCLEAN SIMMONS
06/!5~92 11686 06/I~/92 SOFiWARE TRAINING
06~!y~2~I~8~ 06~!I'/92-SOF'?~ARE-TRAINING ......
06/Ii~/92 I!680 ~"il
~a/~.. SOFIWARE TRAINING
ie~495.38 ..... 0.00 ...... iS,495~-38 .......
~ '~9 O0 0.00 25,!29.00
600;00 ........ ~00 ..........600.00 ....
20.68!.93 (i.00 20.~~, os
-4a,-4t0.:.3 ....... 0.00-- 4e.410.93
~.0~
850.00 ..... 0;00 ~,"-6.' .....
425.00 0.00 425.00
URBANDEE URBA~ OESIBr,' STUDIO
L . 04/24/92"' TOWN SP'CiFiC PLA~: 8,202.13
) · .
Check Totals: 8,202.!3
"+-'>-- .... i-'tO0 On ........
0.00 8.202.13
................. Report-Totals: .............. 371~592~53 .......... 0;00 371,392.53 ......
¢Cl O00105Si
091 000!058~
00! 000!058~
001 00010585
~91 (~(,,'t"05G~
OOl 0001058?
¢01 00010589
Ocj! 0001058?
O01 0001058~
00! 0001058?
--00i--0001~0
001 000105~I
OOi 00~i05~4
000105~7
000105~8
O:}l 00010599
~.. 000105~?
00i 000i0602
001
001 00010605'
00i 00010608
001 00010&12
001
001 000105!~
001 000~0615
.......... r=, =., ~,i=r ......... ....... .,~=.- CARE :;-.-~,'iL:
06/2~;92 B:CFNELL TRAVEL CENTER AIE TICKETS/~AINSTREET CONF. ' ....
~}~/e~'~Sl BiRDSALLrPATRICiA ......... DINNE~ ~EETiNG ............. ,{~.-
, A,icn~u~ PMYr,zn;.h,u:c :::, i....
06/2:/$2 .....
~,~r OT CANYON LANE CONFERENCE JUiv E'?2 "' ":
06/23.'?2 D~VLIN NA¥-JUNE-~RVICES|PL;NNIN~ -2~5.8(. --
06126192 DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER LICENSE RENEWAL FOR CPA 200.00
06/26/9? DONALOSON TIRE SERVICE FLAT TIRE REPAIR 55.2~
061~02 FEBERAL-E-XPRESS POSTAGE & PACKAe~ !L5~---
06/%/~2 GARDNER & ASSOCIATES JR.FIRE DEPT.STICK-ON BADGE
0~/26192 GLENNIS OFFICE PRODUCTS MISC.!TEMS;OPEN ACCOUNT 55.5~
0&I%/72 CLGNNI~S-BFFIC[ PRODIJCTS - MtS-.~--~SFFICE SUPPL4E8 i-2G.-3~
06/%/~2 GLENNIS OFFICE PRODUCTS CLEANERITISSUE;ROLODEX REFILL 121.~1
06/%/~2 GLENMILS OFFICE PRODUCTS '~ M!SC.ITENS!OPEN ACCOUNT 5.17
~/2~2 ----80~DEN-S'FATE-TRAOt-Ne-CO. A~E~-MEMORY;LAGER~T~R~NTER---- 442.-~
06/2~/~2 jOBS AVAILABLE OPEN ACCOUNT FOR A~S:HU.RES. ~7.6C
08/25/82 LEAGUE OF CALiF. CITIES ~OHN MEYER REVITAL.CONFEREN~E 170.0~
06/2~92-- ~UuPu'&~S-T~ ;:'~'ATc~IN~ .................. PUkIC-'SAFET¥-PICN!C ............... 420.0{~
06/2~/92 MARILYN'S COFFEE SERVICE COFFEE SERVICE 149.5~
06/26/92 MGM ASSOCIATES CR MEMO PER BUILDINS/SAFTEY 1.20-
..
....... ~SM'-ASSCt~TES ............................... PL~N-~EVtE~-SERVICEG 779.4~ .....
06/26/72 MUNICIPAL MOMT ASSIST. OF S.C REGISTRATION CONF. AUS.I:-15 !10.00
06/2~/92 MUNICIPAl MGMT ASSIST. OF S.C 15IN ANNUAl CONF. B/13-S/!5 110.00
~ ..... PARTY-RENTA~T-IN> ........ PUBLIC SAFETY-PiCNIC !4~.30
06/2a/92 PETROLANE FUEL (PROPANE) B&S TRUCK
Oa/2U92 THE PLANNING CENTER AMENDMENT TO C0~027! 290.6~
0~Yii~9~ ........ POSTMASTEP ...................... POSTAGE/PACKAGING
06/26/92 RANCNO BLUEPRINT BLUEPRINTS: ENGINEERIN~ DEPT.
06/2~/92 RIVERSIDE BUJEPRINT CUTTING BASE;BOX:ACETATE
0~Y~6~2 R~E~ UjCi M!LEAOE-REIM~URSEMEN~---- t58;8~
06/26/?2 SCOTT'S MEATS PUBLIC SAFETY PICNIC 54B.0~
06/26/92 SECURITY PACIFIC NATIONAL BAN 47980200000107751DD I~4.0~
.'UGY~Y92 SE~ORffY'P'~C'-IF!C-NATIONAL-BAN 47980~)0000108251KL 55.~1
06/25/92 SHELF MASTER SHELVING UNITS;DEAD STORAGE 579.89
06/2&/92 SIR SPEEDY BUS.CARDS FOR NEW EMPLOYEES 28.T~
- 001'--00010~!6----06/2~/92 .......... SMART'-&'-FtNAL CONQEMENTS-SMERRtFS-PiCNtC-- B?T!~-- -
(>01 00010617 06/2~/92 SO.CALIFORNIA TELEPHONE CO. 71454~545~/;/29-5/2! 55.08
(!31 00010624 06/26/92 SPEEDY OIL CHANGE REPAIR & MAINT.CITY VEHICLES 22.49
.3C,~ ~0010~25 06/26/97-- THOMSON-PUBlISHING'GROUP ................... FAIR"LABOR-HAN~BOOK
c>! 00010626 06/26/92 UNITO8 RENTAL SERVICE .-, UNIFORMS RENTAL;PUBLIC WORKS 12.5~
r'~Oi 00010~27 06/%/92 ZYLAB TEXT RETRIEVAL SOFTWARE 108.5&
--'c;~1--O~tt(tG~ 06Y2~f92 COSTCO"WHOLESALE ................ CONOEMENTS/'-SHERRIFS-P!CNIC ~25d~ ....
001 00010629 07/14i92 CALIFORNIAN PUBL,LOL NTC;PLAN.COMM;COUNCL 246.2~
00! 00010~50 071!4/72 GRAFFITI REMOVAL SERVICES GRAFFITI REMOVAL;CITY OF TEN. IJGO.OO
'~>)i"~0910G51 ..... 07/!4/~2 jENNACO ...... OANITORIAL SERV;THRU JUNE 92 1,21~58'
00! 00010655 07/~o~ ~AUR!CE PRINTERS QUICK PRINT 2(;0 BUDGET ~OV~RS' 2.114.06
001 00010657 07/!4/92 RAMTEK BIKE ROUTE REPAIRS:MAINT. 18A95.~8
'~:0~'-00010659 07ii4/92 ....... BECKY~CLEAN'SIMMONS ..... SOFTWARE-TRAININe ................ IdO0~O0--
" 15'~.208.8~
;'ANZHD E:LUEP~:i!:T
2LiVE; BF:OT;EF, i
S~RVEYiNG:RA;;CHC
CON~TR.MSMT.~ ~!-Oi
STREET,STOR~ DRAINJRFS.~IGNL
G;; (:(::;; ',)6-' (, ,:.7;;..'./:.2 UF$;; Z:ESEE;;; E. TjZ;3 u._;, Ttr..r, SFE;;F:3 ,L~;,~ c .......
tl~ ¢00!0~7~
C19 0001('57c' C'b~6z~~/'
019 000105S2 06126/72
019 00010592 06/26!92
019 00010595 0~./26/92
0!9 0,3010602 06126192
. (q9 000106.C4
019 00010605 06/26/92
019 0001060? 06/26/92
---01.94,4Xq.(W~)7
017 00010607 06126/92
019 00010607 06/26/?2
--C~-i 9--41~'>1--~7 ~./-26/-9-2
0t9 00010607 08/261~2
019 00010607 06126192
017 00010607 06/26/~2
.v c.
u., 00010607 06/26/92
00~I~37
0!9 00010667 06/26/92
0i9 00010607
-~qg--~9(qO60~ . 0~6/92
0i9 00010607 06/26/92
(00010607 06/26/92
0i-~ 000!0~07 c ......
019 O0010S07 06126192
019 00010607 0~i26/92
0!9 00010607 0612~t92
0!9 00010607
019 00010607
CALiFORNiA AS~SCiATiC)~ 3:
AMER:C~ ELE~TR:2
BENEF:T AMERICA
~AL4;,cO~NXA-4,AN~PE
COSTCO WHOLESALE
J. R. FREEMAN CO.~ INC
LAKE~E~ORY
LONGS DRUGS
PETROLANE
RANCHO BLUEPRINT
RANCHD WATER
RANCH~-WATER
RANCHO WAlER
RANCHO WATER
RANCHG4A~E~
~ANCHO WATER
RANCHO WATER
RANCHD-WATER
RANCHD WATER
RANCHO WATER
RANCHD WATER
RAN~HD WATER
RANCHO-WATER
RANCHO WATER
RANCHD WATER
RANCHO WATER
RANCHD WATER
--RANCHO-WATER
RANCHO WATER
RANCHD WATER
RANCHO.-WATER
RANCHD WATER
RANOHD WATER
-015--000{0607
0!9 00010607 06126192
i',t ~ 0001060? 06/26/92
--~)!-9~..)4~I0~}7 06~-~1-92
0!9 00010607 06/2~/~2
011' 00010611 06/26/'~2
-0:9--000!061-7 061-26192
0!9 00010ai9 0a/26/92
('19 00010819 06/28/92
~ t .......
,',,e 00010619 06/26/~2
(:? 0001061~ 06/26192
: =~ """"""~=~
. 06/26192 ......... RANCHO-WATER
RANCHD WATER
RANCHD WATER
R~CHD-WATER.--
RANCHD WATER
SAV-DN DRUG STORE
SO.CAL4FORNIA-TELEPHONE-CO.-
SOUTHERN CALIF. EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF. EDISON
SDUT~ERN-CANF.-ED!SDN,
SOUTHERN CAL!F. EDISON
SOUTHERN CALiF. ED!SO~;
SOUTHERN CALiF. ED!EGN
SOUTHE~ PA'F :?c~.
SCUTHER~ CALEF. EZ:iSOk
EOUTHERN r^.:-
SO~TEERfi CALIF. E:.ZSO!=
HC, TEL R.",,' BOARr.' F:ETRE.-'.T
u:.un & MAT ..... BRiZEE:SAK
KED.RE!~B/DEPD CARE 5.'27-6/!':.
----EXTRA-WDR~-ORDERS~L~:~.ETC
SUPPLIES DAY CAMP 2NO SESSID~
TYPEWRITER FOR TCSD
ENIRYJ-F. EI-i)AY-CA~PERS
FIL~ PRINTING ACCDUN!:TCSD
FUEL (PROPANE) TCSD TRUCK
F~iAEIF~6I~
MAPPING SUPPLIES &BLUPR!NTS
170
660,~1: .....
10~,~
2Z ,gjO---
~3,4~
04/16-0511B
0H10-05/12
04124-05/27
04/.16=05~18
04110-5/12
04124-05/27
412400~$22CRI-3/25-4124--
0410B192-05/08/S2
03/!2-04110
-04/~1-/92-05/21!$2-- --
1~4,4~
94.0~
- 5Z,.4E--
352.!E
60,2~
151.6~
500.0~-
0411~1-05118
04/2!-05121
....... ~12b05127
04/10-05/12
03/17-04/16
041-N-05~27
76.!2
396.42
--.98.8~ ....
221.75
0124006002CR/5/25-4/24
03/17-041!6
-04/2!-05i27
011500!012CRI 3/23-~/21
0~/161~2-05118f~2
04108~051~8
05/17-04/!6
04/14-05/13
---04/10-05/12 --
04/07-05/07
0~/12-04/I0
04/24-05/27
SUPPLIES FOR SUMMER DAYCAMP
7!47458550i-4130-5/28 ......
1!2.2F
410.66-
271.8J
568.4F
95.4~
--29~ ....
451.9~-
576.5&
20%1| .....
41B,95-
100,Oe
60,79
4130-5/31
04130-05/31
u~,~-..,,~0
04/30-05/3!
4/50-5/51
04/30-95/:1
27.77
47,7?
.............. 19,95
49,61
55,75
:4.~
........ EDISO~
. ,'.'~ ,'~,',-'~'.----~',,,=~,o~ ..... SOUTHERN'CAL!;-{DISON 04/28/92-05/28/'-72 ""': ....
,.. ......... ...... . .......
"'~=' 0.'..'f!I(.'-'~23.";~/96
........ SOUTHERN CALl7 :Dten~! C.',F/!~/'-'c.-n~,/r!m~o.-
(;l? 0001062: {-",!/2~/92 SOUTHER,~ CAL!F EDISON · '~' '~'~"~'~ "'; "':/"' .Of.
¢19 00010625 06/26~9~ SDUIHER|~ C,,Y. iF EBBON '- 05/t"1'~92-06/t0/82-
0!9 00010623 06126t92 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 05t05192-0610.I/92 197.4~p
019 00010623 06/26/92 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 05111i92-06110192
O$-.4"tX'OYJ625 C'6"/'2~./92 SOUTHERN-CAL-!F-E~n_I~ON ~'04!'28-192-051-29!92-- 57.2~
019 00010625 06/26/92 SOUTHERN CALiF EDISON 05106192-06105!92 9.0[~
019 00010625 06/26192 SOUTHERN CALiF EDISON 05104i92-06103192
019 00010~25 0~/2~,/'72 S~ERN--TAL+F-EI}ISON-- 05t-11-R.~O~flO/$2
0!~ 00010623 06/26/92 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 051061~2-06105192
019 00010623 06126192 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON '-, 05!11192-06!10/~2 ?,3(',
0t,'~-00~i~0625 06t26,-~,2 SOUTHERN-CAL~FEDISON .............. 05101t92-06t02R2 ............ .?-,~..-
019 00010625 06/26192 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 04/29/92-05/29/92
q,e 00010623 06/2'-/92 enUTHERN CA' T,: EDISON n310~/~2-05/~I/o..'-
C'1,~"t¢*~Yrj625 06~26t92 SOUTHERN'CAL-iF-EDISO~ ........... 05t04t92-06!03/92 .................. 9~00 --
019 00010625 06/26/92 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 05/05/92-06/03/92 32.7I
019 00010623 06/26/92 SOUTHERN CALiF EDISON 05/01/92-06/02/92 !5.10
"'~'j!9"~(,,~623 06/26Y92 ....... SOUTHERN-CA~tF EDISON ..................... 04t06t92-05/05/92 ........ !97r70---
C19 00010625 06/26/92 SOUTHERN CAL!F EDISON 05/07/92-06109/92 19!.3~
¢!9 00010625 06/26/92 SOUTHERN CAL!F EDISON 03/3!/92-04/29/72 !83.09
· ...... SOUTHERN-CALiF-EQISON 04/30/92-06/01/92 ...........
0i9 00010623 06/26/92 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 'O/'~Q~Ol'll/3At'ni 182.84
019 00010625 06/26/92 SDUIHERN CALIF EDISON 1!/30/9i-!2/31/91 181.50
"'7!9"000106L2.1- 06Y~6>9~'' e""THE ~' -
.... RN ~A~F"ED!SO~' 05/04/92-06/05/92 ............. %01
019 00010623 06/26/92 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 04/2B/92-05/28/92
¢!9 000!0623 0S/26/92 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 05/06/92-06/05/72 ,~.00
!2:i,!,)001f~623 '~-~9~-fQ~. S~JTHERII'f,~,'F'EzDISDN ................ f~4 '~9 ~O'~-,'LS ~ ~o---- !9BT4~- -
0!9 00010623 06/26192 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 04!03192-0610!/~2 196.37
,'319 0001062-5 06/26/92 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 0~/06/92-06/05/92 40.45
"'~II' 00'~116~3"'--~6~26~ ..... SOUTHERN- CAklF'EDISON i4/50i72-06/01'/92-- -8.-i2
019 00010625 06/26/92 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 05/11/92-06/10/92 18.60
019 00010623 06/2~/92 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 9/28/9!-10/29/91 !7~.52
""!)l'c~'Clwl'{.t6~ 06,~16",92 SOUTHERN-CAm;iF. EDISON---- 04128t92-05/28i92 ............ 6L43. - -
019 0001062-5 06/26/92 SOUTHERN CAtiF EDISON 12/31/91-01/30/92 168.B2
{'i9 00010623 06/26/92 SOUTHERN CAtiF EDISON 04/2~/92-0B/22/92 247.!2
'~Z'~9'00010423 06~'2~'/92 ...... SOUTHERN'CAt-IF--EDISON -' -'05/06/92-06/05/92 ...........
C'.9 00010623 06/26/92 SOUTHERN CAtiF EDISON ., 05/11/92-06/10/92 9.38
eL9 00010623 06/26/92 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 03/06/92-04/06/92 217.62
"'f:!'q"0001~)625 06~26;~92 SDUTHERN-CALtF-EDiSON ................. 04/30/92-04/01/92 --
C>!9 00010623 06/26/92 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 05/0B/92-06/09/92 9.SO
(49 00010623 06/26/92 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 05/06/92-06/05/92 9.00
"~'I¢,'000!0~23 06/26/92 .......... SOUTHERN'CAr'IF-EDISON ............... O'~mi~9-n~/06~Q~ ........ 202.24
<'19 00010625 06/26/92 SOUTHERN CALiF EDISON 04/01/92-04/30/92 1,202.80
v:. 00010625 ....... ~. SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 05/0B/72-06/09/92 9.80
'~:r:9--00010625 ...... 06/26/92 ........... SDUTHERN-CALiF--EDISDN -- 01/30/92-03/02/92 .......... 194.0!
C:9 00010626 06/26/92 UN:TDG RENTAL SERVICE UNIFORM RENTALS:COM~..~EFz',/ICE 12.50
;:!9 00010629 n',,~.~/~. .... ;n~, -,
r,=~,,,..,:uN BF~OCHU~,ES =, 0'7, C nn
C'9 ""' .......... ' ......
~;~ .........'~;:C'-~-A.~¢I,~L''. ~=:~' "?c' 40F:,(0
':'L9 .......... '~' .....
"":' C!CrZ'I':~EE' ':>i/2,~ ;?2 ~= ..........."'
~ .....=,..m~,~._ ,E- ................."' E!<:,!EF:C,N~,)'~T: ......,.~,-,:.~,.;.-:.~: - ......
':'2'.-" '.:'00;(~607 C,.':.-/2!"72 "":' F:E:'¢'.B8'::"':'~[C~. ""' :.:.T~.!~ C~E~'E:CC.M~.EE!:.rEF:
.-:..,~z 7..~.:EZi i;UyE:E~: zr.:Z!
Check Date Vendor ;I.~
I'jI)OlO~ 0~/50/~2 IC~ARETi IC~A RETIREENT
2F~" ~ 0~/041~2 06!04!~2 Normal F'I~ ~04~ 590.57 O On 5~0.57
2DFC~.8~-- 0~/181~2 0~/18/~2 Noriai PI~, ~/~8/~2 575.77 0.00 575,7
0&30~2 OS/501~2 0~/50i~2 RETIREMENT/~UNE 19~2 10,575.85 0.00 I0,~75.85
065072-I 0~/50/~2 0~/50/~2 RETIREMENT DEPOSIT ~UNE ~2 55.00 0,00 55.00
5~5.19 0,00 11,5~5.17
Chec~ Totals: II~ .
0001064~ 0~/30R2 ASCOM ASCOM HASLER MAILING SYSTEP~
11~01 0&/2~/~2 O&I24*/-°,*2-REP*L-ENtSH-P*OSTAGE-.4t-I~I ~.<O~>J)O 0,-9~
&01441 O&/18R2 11&68
Check Totals:
Oa/O4/t2 ~ND CLEANER;SORBENT~P.W.
4,000.00 0.00 4,000,00
~04.15 0.00 ~04.15
Cheek--Tot;Is: ~04-,-1~ 0,*00 904.15
O0010&48 06/~0/q2 BEARCR[ BEAR CREEK
052~2 05/2q192 11705 05/01I~2 REPRINTS OF ARTICLE 500,00 0.00 500.00
00010&49 Oal~O/t2 8IOCYCLE BIOCYCLE
OGOB?2 OG/OBR2
Check Totals: 500.00 0,00 500.00
O~/OB/t2 92-~3 SUBBG~IPTION $B,~,O 0.00 ~.00
Check Totals: 58.00 0.00 58.00
O0010aDO OG/~Olt2 ~BET CA~T
&48~2 0~/19R2 !1&02 05t13192 RUG RENTALS THRU OUNE ~2' 54.25 0.00 54.25
O0010GD10&150/~2 CAL!FORN CALIFORNIAN
055172 05/51192 11574
058I~2A 05/81/72 I1578
Chec~--Tot~ia.:
05/05R2 ADS~SUMMER CAMP
0~Jr05192 ~!CRAFT FAIR;517/t2
~17 ,T& 0.00 ,317
105¢92 0~00
O001C&~20~/;OR2 C3AST CO COAST SOMPBTE
0a25~2 06/2~/t2
Check Totals:
OG!2SR2 MAGAZINE
425.68 0.00 425,&8
55.00 0.00 55.00
Chec-k-T~tals:
O00!OaS~ 0&150/72 COPYLINE COPY LINE CORPORATION
78421 05/01/g2 ll&71 05101R2 SERVICE & PARTS~RICOH 5540
~5.00 0.00 ]5.00
iJ~5.72 0.00 1,4~,3.72
Check Totals:
00010&54 O&/SO/g2 CTYCLERK CITY CLERKS ASSOC. DF CALIF,
0&2~92 Oa42tt~2 O~-2-°,4-~-ANNUAL-I~E~BE-RBHi-P--~-t3
1,4~3,72 0.00 , 493,79
· -,
0.00
Bg-23: IgO -06/2&t92 11297
00010656 06/30!92 DIXON DAVID F. DIXON
0625~2 06/25/~2
Check Totals:
05/31/92 AUDIO IAPE;TRAFFiC CDMM.MTBS.
0&/25/72 ~UNE EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT
100.00 0.00 100.00
130.00 0.00 130.00
130,¢0 0,00 1;0.00
94.02 O.O0 14.02
00010657 06/50/~2 FAiRMOUN FAIRMOUNT HOTEL
Check Totals:
OaI22/-g2-~AINSTREET-CONF.,
~4,02 0.00 ~I.02
Check Totals: 264.00 0.00 264.00
-00O!%57 05/30R2 FEDERALE--FEDERAL-EXPRESS ..................
Inv~ic~ Da~ F'/C
Dat~ Descri:ti=
~,1 .... POSTAGE & ..~[H=~N~
22.44 9. ',:~ ::: ': :.-'-'
Check-Totais~ ............
00010655' 06/30/72 GLENNIES BLENN!ES OFFICE PRODUCTS
,v~,-v ' 122/92 11880 061!t/?'2 TCSD: OFFICE SUPPLIES
120H3 0 0U22/92 !1&~I 0~/!1/C2 TCSD; DFFIC[ C~PL!ES
......... 22~4A 0.00 22.4~
I2063H2
Check Totals:
G~BAL COMPUTEHUPP.f.S
0G/17/92 11658 06t03/92 PARALLEL LINE EXTENDER
,nn n~ 0.00 .... ~
650.59 O.O0 650.58
Check Tabaks:
00010661 06/30/92 BOLDENST SOLDEN STATE TRADING CO,
15104 O&/l&/g2 11644 05/27/~2 REPLACENENT KEY ~OARDIPOLICE
Check Totals:
00010662 06/30R2 LEAGUE LEAGUE OF CALIF, CITIES
0624q2 06f24/92 06/24/92 RES, FEE REVIT/MAIN ST-CONF
42.25 0.00 42.25
42.25 0.00 42.25
!7OvOe ,hi)e !70.00
00010&&30&/30/t2 LEE
7&2B
Check Totals:
--I'TiVE LEE COUNTRY FRANffi8
06/0&I~2 11658 05/211t2 FRAHE CITY SEALSPOLICE DEPT,
170,00 0,00 170.00
12&.t7 0.00 12&,97
O0010&&4 06/30/t2 ~MASC MUNICIPAL NGNT ASSIST. OF S,C
0623924 06/25/92 06/25/~2 15TH ANNUAL CONF, 8/15-8/!5
Check Totals:
OL ~50&I30/V2 HUSSEREN HUSKER ENGINEERING CONSULTANT
061~ 06116/91 06/I~FHY ~F TKACT t21067
12tT~7 (r:OQ 12&,q7
110,00 0,00 II0,00
i10,00 0,00 110,00
211,20 0,00 211,20
00010~&6 0&/30/~2 DCO~PRL'ORAPHXt~'T-I. liC.
41050~ 06/111/92 11586
410485 06/IIl/92 11586
0~18~2 0~/11I/~2 1158~
410625 0&/111/92 1158&
412545 06/2:J92 11586
411419 06-/'I~12-II186 -
411405 06/I'Vg2 11586
410583 06/I1~/92 11586
41FzB4 06/17R2 ii586
Check Totals:
05/05/92 PRINTING COSTS~NLCENTER
05/05/t2 PRINTING COSTS~CONN,CENTER
05/05it2 PRtNTiNB-I(~TS~gG~iiTCENTE~
05/05/t2 PRINTING COSTS=CON~,CENTER
05/05/92 PRINTING CDSTS|CONLCENTER
051051~INTING-OOgT.~TCO~,-CENTE9
05/05/92 PRINTING COSTS;CONN,CENTER
05/05/q2 PRINTING COSTS;CONH,CENTER
05Yl)f/~ztNT-llBlltlt'.ONN,-CBii, R
2II.20 0,00 2!1,20
38,14 0.00 38,14
44.80 0.00 44.80
43,58 0.00
3.23 0.00 3.23
1~,50 0.00 !%50
1~;50
!9,50 0.00 it.50
48.27 0.00 48,27
25,0t) 0:00 ~.-00
Check Totals:
"'O0010667-Ob~-301~'2'ORANB~RAMGE-COUNTY-iTRIPINB-SERVIC
0020085 06/18/V2 06/18/92 STRIPING & STENCILS
2&I.52 0,00 26!.52
780.00 0.00 780,00
O00!OS&B 06/30/92 RAHTEK RAHTEK
4094 06/19/92 0402
Check'-Tutais: 780;00
05/15/~2 EMER6.STR.REPAIR;VIA SEVILLA ~4&.57
O~OO 7B(h~H)
0,00 646.57
Check Totals: 646,57
0001066~ 06/Z0/~2 RAN-CAL RAN-CAL JAN!TDRIAL SUPPLY
--~" 5515 ..... OallBt92i!5~S---'Oi/29/~2-OPEN-ACCOUNTdCSD ..................... 28.00
0,00 646,57
0,00 '28,00-'
Check Totals: 28,00 0,00 28,00
--O0~0670'06730~2-RANCHO~L-RANCHO-BL~EPRINT -
....... Pe~cri~t:~
l,,,~= D~te F!/C Date
..... c~,~/q~ ...... ~.,:_ ~LUEPRIHTE: ENGiNEERINS
Check lotals:
00010671
~ ~v,:~ RANCH~TR ~ANCHO WATER
013!501!1K 04/02/92 04/02/~2 01/~2-02/25
0!~!!7~/~2 Oq.'!C/?2 02;2-5=05/;6
13!170052K 04/02/92 04/02/92 01/22-02/25 ~7.46- O.OO
131170052J 0~/04/92 06/04/92 03/26'04/27 102.79 0.00 102.70
':~III?O05L 06/17/92 O&/-I~o,~-4)il-2J-'4)Sf27
0124025001 06/17/92 06/17/92 04/24-05/27 620.27 0.00 620.27
124025001 05/20/~2 05/20/92 03/25-04/24 !0.49 0.00 10.49
00010672 06/30/92 RECYCLIN RECYCLING TIHES
O&IR2
Check Totals: 1,098.13 0.00 1,098.!3
O&/-144-V2--IYR-SUBSCR*I PT-T-I 0 N
~5,00 0.00 ~5.00
Check Totals:
nnni nL?! r~tS~(~) Ion ROSE-RSE-N--ROGE. Rz-a-E-NGINEER-I-N6
061182 O&/IB/92 06/1B/92 SPORTS PAR): DRAWING/FILES
95.00 0.00 ~5.00
150.00 0.00 150.00
00010674 06/50/92 RONALDS~ RONALD SHITH
065o~ 06/25/92
Chec-k--.T-.oba-~:
06/25/92 CONSULTING SERV/ASSESS DEVEL
Check Totals:
00010675 06/30/92 SANDIEGO SAN DIEGO UNION/UNION TRIBUNE
OGiS2-~52O 0~/!~/~-I~&97 061tGI~240B-RECRUIi~NT-ADS~iNSPECTOR
· 0603~2 06/03/92 11518 02/14/92 OPEN ACCOUNT)RECRUITMENT ADS
150.¢~ 0.00 150.00
390,00 0.00 390,00
390,00 0,00 390,00
--324.-52 O,O0 324~2 -
307.4~ O.OO
00010676 06/50/92 SC SIGNS SC SIGNS
060492 06/04/92 0355
060492A 061~4~92
Check Totals:
02/01/92 POSTING SIGNS~PUB.HEARING NTC
· -O&/O~R2-NAY-~ONTHLY !HST-AI-L-FEE
495,00 0.00 495.00
Check Totals:
--000-10677 O~/z.,OA92-BEC. URI~-SECUR(TY .qA&IF-IC-NATIONAU--I)AN
053192 05/31/92 05/51/92 BAN[ CHARGES FOR HAY
BlO.O0 0.00 BlO,O0
264,67 0.00 264.67
00010678 06/30192 SHELDON
46461
~&q70
46467
Check-Totals:
SHELDON EXTINGUISHER CO.
06116192 1171B 06/16/92 ANNUAL SERVICE ON EXT.
061~4;49 O~/-2-2-/-9-2-~ERVtCE-ON-F4~E-EXT.
06/22/92 11719 06/22/92 SERVICE ON FI~E EXT.
264-,17 0,00
90.00 0.00 90.00
22~50 0.00 22,50
22.50 0.00 22.50
Check-Totals:
00010679 06/30/92 SOUTHCED SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
6640510402 06/24/92 ' 06/24/92 05/!9-06/!9
~79f8080--4&t~4~2 061~4f92-0514~-0~t1~
664050677 06/24/92 06124/92 05/19-06/19
i65848085 0~/24/92 06124/~2 05t!9-06/!9
-66584~56!-06/24/92 .............. O5/24!g2-OS/!9-O6Ilg .....
a~'84805"I 0a/24/92 06/24/~2 05/!9-06t19
6658~8063 0~124/72 06/24/72 05/i~-06/!?
6~SB&GOalO-06/2&t92 .......... 0~/2~/~2.05/19-0~t1~
135,00 0,00 I~5,00 ,
206.46 0.00 206.46
19.61-- 0.00 li..~l ,
195.46 0.00 195.46
478.06 0.00 478.06
...................... ~94.-46 ..............O.O0 994,46 ......
1,04~.!! 0.00 1,04~,II
eO.5~ 0.00 80.56
...... 546.~0 0.00 5~""' .......
Check Totals:
~,~.v.~. ~ U ~,570.02
~OOH~GeO~)6/~Ot~2-SPEDYO!~PEEOY~IL-CHANGE ...........................
='~: C~A,'~t~:~ .... 02/04/~2 REPAIR & .......... VEHICLES
~2°~ ('/~5~c~ 02/05/~2 MAIN~. ,
Check lo~ais:
{3O~IqSQ~ 08/ZO/?? ..... n~ T BOARD ~r
:~.~:Bu, S ~TE ^" EQUALIZATION .
0624~2 04/24/72 06/24/92 EEB.--M.j. CIIY TAX-G.r-M.:{NAR
Check Totals:
7 I 04/18/92 SERVICE CALL; FAX MACHINE
22.49
44.~8
25.00
75.00
:
00010685 06130/92 UNITOB UNITO8 RENTAL SERVICE
8771570626 06/26R2 0345 02/27/~2 UNIFORMS RENTALSPUBLIC WORKS
8'7'?~i'04't~6"O6'/~j'f!:2 ii18t) I'2'I~gI'-UNIFQRH-RENTA~TCO~-~,E~ICE
75.00
12.50
12;50
Check Totals: 25.00
Report Totals: ]0,442.02
0.00
O.OO
0.00
0.00
0.00
O;O0
0.00
0.00
22.4C
22.4~,
44 ,?S
25~00
25.00
75.00
75.00
12.50
25,00
30,442.02
CHECi ,iSTIhS ~ FUNE'
FUND CHECK NUmbER CHEC[ DATE VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION
OOi 000i0644 06!50i92
OOi 00010644 06/50/92
001 00010644 06150192
001 00010644 06/50/92
001 00010644 06/30/92
001 OOO-HX~44 06/50/92
001 00010646 06i30192
001 00010647 06/30/92
0~1--00010649 06/30~92
001 00010650 06/30/92
001 00010652 06/30/92
001 000106Z 0~r/30/92
001 00010654 06/30/92
OOl 000~0655 0~/~0/92
001 ~i~6 06/30/~2
001 00010657 06/30/92
001 00010658 06/30/92
681 ~t~ 08Y50~2
001 000106~I 0~/30/~2
001 00010665 06/30/~2
001 00010664 06/50/~2
001 O0010&~7 06/30/~2
001 00010~68 0~/50/~2
OOi ~0010670 0~/~2
001 00010672
001 00010~74
001 00010675
001 00010676 06/30/~2
601 00610~77 06/~0/~2
001 00010878 0a/50/~2
001 00010878 0~/50/~2
001 00010[~8~
00i 00010679
001 00010~80
001 O00108Si
001 ~0010~82
001 00010~85 0~/~0/~2
ICMA RETIREMENT .........................
ICNA RETIREMENT
ICMA RETIREMENT
-ICMA-RET!RE~ENT .....
ICMA RETIREMENT
ICMA RET!RE~ENT
ICMA RETI~GENT
ASCOM HASLER MAILING SYSTEMS
BALL INDUSTRIES
--BIDCYCLE
CADET UNIFORM
COAST COMPUTE
C~PYL~N.r--GORPORAT~ON
CITY CLERKS ASSOC, OF CAL]F,
DAVLIN
DAVIi)-F. DIXON
FAIRMOUNT HOTEL
FEDERAL EXPRESS
SLGDAL--~:~OJJPUTEH~PPL-tEi
SOLDEN STATE TRADING CO.
STEVE LEE COUNTRY ~RAMING
ORANGE COUNTY STRIPING SERVIC
RAMTEK
RANC~O BLUEPRINT
RECYCLING TINES
RONALD SMITH
SAN-DiEGO-UNIONz'UNION-iRIi)UNE
SAN DIEGO UNION/UNION TRIBUNE
SC SIGNS
5I-Ot~f-T~-PAt'~IF~ NATIONAL BAN
SHELDON EXTINGUISHER CO.
SHELDON EXTINGUISHER CO.
SHELDON'E~TINGUISER-CO,
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SPEEDY OIL CHANGE
STATE-tOARttF-EQUALttATiON
TEMECULA COPIERS
UNITOS RENTAL SERVICE
RETIREMENT/jUNE-tg~2
Norma! P/R, 8104/92 447.9c
RETIREMENT/JUNE 1992 "~.144.~T
Normal-P/R,-6f!8/92 ' ' 4~:.!~
RETIREMENT/JUNE !992
RETIREMENT DEPOSIT JUNE ~2
RET(REMENT-/-~UNE-~992
REPLENISH POSTAGE 111601
HAND CLEANER;SORBENT;P.W.
92 S~UBSC-RtP~ION
RUG RENTALS THRU JUNE 92' 34.2~
MAGAZINE 35.00
SERVICE & PAR-G~ICOH-SMO I~;.~2-
ANNUAL ~EMBERSHIP 92-93 100.00
AUDIO TAPE;TRAFFIC CO~N.NTGS. 13~.00
JUNE-EXPiENSE-REIRBURSE~ENT ----70.-tg-
MAINSTREET CONF. 284.00
POSTAGE & PACKAGING 22.44
PARALLEL L~NE-~)DER 65O.SB-
REPLACEMENT KEY BOARD;POLICE 42.25
FRANE CITY SEAL;POLICE DEPT. 12&.97
15TH-ANNUAb-CONF. 8~-8~i5 iJ~4Xt-
STRIPIN6 & 8TENOILS 78L00
EMERG.STR.REPAIR;VIA SEVILLA 64&.57
DL~HEPRtNTS;-ENBINEERtNB-DEPT.
1YR SUBSCRIPTION 9).00
CONSULTING SERV/ASSESS DEVEL 39$.00
DPEN--ACCOttNTI, RECRUt~ENT-ADS .... 307T44-
JOB RECRUITMENT ADS;INSPECTOR "' 32(,52
POSTING SIGNS;PUB,HEARING NTC 495,00
BANK-OHARGES--Fi)R--IqAY 28q;6t-
SERVICE ON FIRE EXT. 22,50
ANNUAL SERVICE ON EXT, 90,00
SERt/ICE-iN-F-IRE-EI(T, 22TSe.-
05/19-06/1~ ~,148,49
REPAIR & MA!NT.CITY VEHICLES 22.49
RE6. M.J. C-H-Y-TiiHE)HNAR
SERVICE CALL; FAX ~ACHINE 75.00
UNIFORMS RENTAL;PUBLIC WORKS 12.50
001
016 00010648 GG/30fi2
016 00010656 06/30/92
016 00010662 06/30/92
BEAR-CREEl;
DAVID F. DIXON
LEAGUE OF CALIF. CITIES
REPRtiiTStFtRTtCLE
JUNE EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT
REB. FEE REVIT/MAIN ST CDNF
50~0-
23.90
17~.00
0!6
693.90
0t!--O~106tt' ObtiO/t'2
019 00010644 06~30~92
019 00010644 06/30/~2
' O.+i"O~lO&51' 16~30I~2--
019 00010651 06/30/92
019 00010659 06/30/92
--019--e0010665- 06't50t92--
019 00010669 06/30/92
019 00010671 06/30/92
019~001:j6-7I---06~30192--
ICMA-~-ltRtEMENT
ICNA RETIRENENT
ICNA RETIREMENT
CALIFORNIAN ....................
CALIFORNIAN
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCTS
MUGGER-ENGINEERING CONSULTANT-
RAN-CAL JANITDRIAL SUPPLY
RANCHD WATER
RANCHO-WATER
Normal P/RT-6t04t92
RETIREHENT/JUNE 1992
Normal P/R, 6118192
-ADSISUMNERIANP--
AD;CRAFT FAIR;5/7192
TCSD; OFFICE SUPPLIES
---TOPOGRAPHY-OF-TRACT 121067
OPEN ACCOUNT;TCSD
01/22-02/25
04t24-05t27-----
t42~B -
2,329,33
142,58
31);76-
105,92
~422,25
28.00
116,37
620,27 -
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
0i9 00010671 06/30/12
017 00010671 06/50/92
017 00010671 06/30/92
-- -OOOlO&7t- 06130192
Oiv 00010671 06/30/?2
017 00010675
0!? Of~ 06130R2
019 00010679 08/~0/92
019 00010679
----0-!~--00010680 06/~2
019 00010683 06/30/92
029 00010666
RANCHO ~ATER
RANCHO WATER
RANCHO WATER
RANCHO WATER .....
RANClIO WATER
ROGER' SENS INEER I NG
SOUTHERN CAL!F EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SPE[4)-Y-~rlL-CItN~,E
UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE
01122-02/25 ..... 3T.4~-
03/2>04/24 !C.~
03/2~-04/27
04/27-05/27 - 257,~2
02/25-03/26 27.~5
SPORTS PARK DRAWING/FILES !50.0('
I'iAY,-ffi)NTHLY,-ZNSIALLj~E
05/19-06/19 401.t2
05110-06/18 19.61
RE~A!R ~ .~I-NT. VEHtCL-ES~-CSD 22,-~---
UNIFORM RENTALS;COMM,SERVICE I%50
5,71L~.. _
OCB REPROBRAPHICS, INC. PRINTING CDSTS!COMM.CENTER 26!.$2
30,442.02
CHEKREG2
DATE 07/06/92
DATE
07/01/92
07/01/92
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOiD
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
07102192
07/02/92
07/02/92
07/02/92
07/02/92
07/02/92
07/02/92
07/02/92
07102192
07/02/92
07102192
07/02/92
07/02/92
07/02/92
07102192
07/02/92
07/02/92
07/02/92
08:30
CHECK #
1064.3
1068/*
11011
11012
11013
1101/,
11015
11016
11017
11018
11019
11020
11021
11022
11023
1102/,
11025
1107.6
1'i027
11028
11029
11030
11031
11032
11033 F
1103/,
11035
11036
11037
11038
11039
000381
000382
000100
000108
000137
0001~2
000155
000196
000209
000218
000262
000292
000310
0003~7
000374'
000380
00038
000385
000386
00038?
CITY OF TEHECULA
CHECK REGISTER
NAHE
T%RZTILLI, STEVE J.
RAGZHG MATERS
ALLIED BARRICADE CONPANY,%NC.
ALL CITY I~m, NAGENEMT
CHB/RON U,$,A, [NC,
CONSERCO
DAVL. ZN
IHLANO CALL ANERICA
L & N FERTILIZER
NARILYN~S COFFEE $ERVIC~
RANCHO 14ATER
SPETZ, LISA
TENEOJLA CREEK INN
ZEE NEDICAL SERVICE
SOUTHERe CALIF EDISON
LAIDLAW TRANSIT
GREAT GRAPHICS & FRANIMG
SHELDON EXTINGUISHER CO,
LANIER VOICE PRODUCTS
CAREER TRACK SENINARS NS2
TOTAL CHECKS
PAGE 1
ANGUNT
3,37/*.95
6O2.00
185.35
10,930.00
192.50
1,333
2,/,37.08
80.80
57.75
77.67
8,96
50,99
802.65
/,05.00
1,269.1/,
80.65
6.,~.51
98. O0
REDENPTION DATE
t','LZt [ ~Z
001
~01 ·
r'J0't
.301
,301
,3Q1
.3.01
,3(31
.301
001
,301
,3(31
.':(31
,301
,3(31
n,(31
CZTY OF TEHE~_JLA
=-'(Pc-NO [T'dR,cS 3Y ~EPARTHE.~T
0TIOZ/9Z - .-'OR ALL
VENDOR
PAGE 1
ALL,lEO aARR[r..ADE
ALL (:[TY HANAGE,,IENT
ALL CITY ,qAHAG~'qENT
ALl. CZ:TY ,',tANAG~"HENT
CH~/RON U,.S,A,
CH~,/R(]N
CHEVRON
QAVL,[N
OAVT, .[ N
0 AVt, t N
INLAND CALL AHtl ICA
L & H FE.tTTLLZE.q.
t & :,1
L ,T, ,',! FF.~TZr.~Z_wt
NARILYN'S COFF~
$PETT.,
TL='HECTJLA
Z~_= ,qEDECAL
$(3UTHE.W..N CAL[F
GREAT GRAPHICS
SHEL0aN
LANIER VO[C~ PfROOUCT
OE$~.IIPTI(3N ANCUNT
SIGHS 185
r=.=.'l[C~S F.ION/-119
$~'=.V[C~ 5/::51/92-~/ ~., 183.90
79ZrJT'/"ZZ~/=zUtLD 119.33
79ZQT'7?~3/PQLLC~ 77.37
7VZGT'/7..3~/CZ:TY .'4A :8,28
TEC. I].IIC.~L SE.:IV'[C~ 19zja
C.:TT CCUHC-'L HE=T[ 6Z3...!3
;ust..,c ~F'srY c:ae Ga.,30
ACCT, t~37159~:3~I 5 Z, GT.,38
PRO C/rT[NG ~DG~ 23.20
;.~0 ~ CL'TTZNG H 23,ZQ
~L3, LZ~E ~4,.~,0
O'~-F~-,.l. -qJPP~.CE$
HI~.R,11 ,tUNE 9 8.96
)tEETI:XG E..I.~.O. 50.99
FiP,.$T AZ0 SUPPLIES 69.88
&i-77-=-~/PH65-01 - ZT'~.ja
,MAPS 1 ,Z69.
va[c~ ;=RCOi..L'T$ 6.IA.j1
CAREER TRAC3C $EC INAR .$.$.$.$.$.$.$.$.$~[.IA~IlCC:!,!LIX[CAT 98.00
F[TffD 00]. ~O~AZ, . $].7,967.92
VL=NOQR OESI;Z[PTIOII ANOUNT
CHEVRON U,S,A, [NO. ~'F)ZgT"I"~'~/'T'r,~D 18,06
RANC~O VATE~ 01-Of,.-,..~1~-I/311
IU, NCZ. tO VAI'B 01 --34,--34,015-1 $F..RV
SOUTHE?dt CALIF EDI SO ~9-TT-/.16-2307-02- 196.66
SCUTHEP, H C,,AL,[F ~i)($13 ~9-7'"r-:.az-54,t/*-(T'~c- 11,23
$1~ri'HERN CALZF ='D(SI3 ~,~-77'-,-,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,~J~-~423-tJ3-9.~.8
SCUTHE.;,N C, AI.[F m[sa .rT-.,'7-,';o-a7~..l-o3- 9.aa
SGUTH~ CAL[F ~D[S(3 .~9-?'T-2.~o1,3Z1-a3o 9.~8
mUTHERN CALLF ~[sa .=~-Tt-,?'99-~O~-a3- 9.~8
$C;UTHERN CALXF --~[S0 .{9-77-I,16-~SQ5-01- ZT'Z.,3O
TZR[T[LL[, STEVE J, ,~ILI' .t_m!T,/TE;'ti C~i
LAZDLAt,/,~'RANSZT SU$ T2AIi$~GRTATZI3H ~5.ao
RAGZNG VATER$ OAT CA,',Le ?~lP ?O R 6oZ.aa
FO'ffD 019/:L90 '~O~AT., $5,006.83
CHEKREG2
DATE 07/06/92
DATE
VOID
VOXD
VOID
VOZD
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOZD
VOID
VOXD
VOZD
VOID
VOXD
VOID
VOXD
VOID
VOID
VOZD
VO[D
VOXD
VOID
07/1/*/92
07/1/*/92
0711/*i92
07/1/*/92
07/1/*192
11:20
CHECK #
11Oleo
110/.1
11042
110/,3
11064
110/e5
1104.6
1104,7
11GG8
110~9
11050
11051
11052
11053
1105/,
11055
11056
11057
11058
11059
11060
110~1
11062
11063
11064,
11065
11066
11067
VEND #
000123
00017.6
OOO257
000..~1
O00.T~
0O038/*
CZTY OF TEHECULA
CHECK REGZSTER
NAHE
BURICE gILLIAN$ & SORENSEli
CALZFORNiA LANDSCAPE
RANTEK
WILLDAN ASSOCIATES
W. DEAN DAVIDSOB
LAW/CRANDALL, ZNC,
TOTAL CHECKS
PAGE 1
.M4OUNT
Z, TZS.?Z
11
Z8,889.77
30,96Z.00
1,265.00
10/*,608.89
REDEIqPTZON DATE
LVL.3L ! SZ
07/06/9:~ '13:57
K NUMBER
160
FUND NUMBER
1W
190
190
210
2./-
C/TY OF TEMECULA
07/14/92 - FOR ALL PERIODS
VENDOR
RN4TEK
WILLDAN ASSOCIATES
WILLDAN ASSOCIATES
VENDOR
PAGE I
DESCRZPTXON AM(X.INT
ASPHALT PATCHING/6
DEVELOF~ENT REVXBJ
CREDIT FOR PLAN
11,742.00
28,984.27
94.50'
FUND 001 TOTAL $40,631.77
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
BURKE WXLLZAHS & SOR LEGAL SERVICES 3/3 2,723.72
FUND 016/160 TOTAL $2,723.72
VENDOR DESCRIPTZOR A/4OI, JNT
CALXFORNIA LANOSCAPE JUNE 92 MAINTENANC
CALZFORNIA LANDSCAPE JUNE ~2 NAINTENANC
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE JUNE 92 NAZNTENANC
FUND 019/190 TOTAL
18,800.60
9,66~.80
561.00
$29,026.40
.
VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
g. DEAN DAVIDSON ARCHITECTURAL COliT 16,262.00
g. DEAN DAVIDSON ARCHITECTURAL CONT 14,700.00
LAg/CRANDALL, INC. PROFESSZONAL SERV[ 1,265.00
FUND 021/210 TOTAL $32,227.00
GRAND TOTAL 10~,608.89
ITEM
NO.
4
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CiTY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
Mary Jane Henry, Finance Officer
July 14, 1992
City Treasurer's Report as of May 31, 1992
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive and file the City Treasurer's
report as of May 31, 1992.
DISCUSSION: Reports to the City Council regarding the City's investment
portfolio and receipts, disbursements and fund balance are required by Government
Code Sections 53646 and 41004 respectively. The City's investment portfolio is in
compliance with the Code Sections as of May 31, 1992.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
ATTACHMENT:
City Treasurer's Report as of May 31, 1992
City of Temecula
City Treasurer's Report
As of May 31, 1992
Cash Activity for the Month of May:
Cash and Investments as of May 1, 1992
Cash Receipts
Cash Disbursements
Cash and Investments as of May 31, 1992
$
$
12,875,710
3,863,145
(937,337)
15,801,51 8
Cash and Investments Portfolio:
Type of Investment
Institution
-J3emand Deposits
reasury Service Shares
Petty Cash
Deferred Comp. Fund
Local Agency Investment Fund
Security Pacific
Pacific Horizons
N/A
ICMA
State Treasurer
Cash and Investments as of May 31, 1992
Yield
N/A
3.650%
N/A
N/A
5.379%
Matudty
Date
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Balance
asof
May 31, 1992
(233,410) (1)
176,289
800
73,766
15,784,073
15,801,51 8
(1)-This amount includes outstanding checks.
Per Government Code Requirements, this Tmasurer's Report is in compliance with
the City of Temecula's Investment Policy and there are adequate funds available
to meet budgeted and actual expenditures for the next thirty days of the City
of Temecula.
Prepared by Carole Serfling, Senior Accountant
ITEM NO.
5
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
Scott Field, City Attorney
July 14, 1992
Establishing of Permanent Appropriation Limits for the City, and
Submittal to the Voters of the Amount of Such Limits for the City,
and Submittal to The Voters of the Amount of Such Limit at the
November 3, 1992 General Election
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the following resolutions entitled:
"A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA,
GIVING NOTICE OF THE SUBMISSION TO THE VOTERS OF A QUESTION RELATING
TO THE APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT OF THE CITY, TO BE CONSIDERED AT THE
GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 3, 1992.
"A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
SETTING PRIORITIES FOR FILING WRITTEN ARGUMENTS REGARDING A CITY
MEASURE AND DIRECTING THE CITY ATTORNEY TO PREPARE AN IMPARTIAL
ANALYSIS"
"A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA,
PROVIDING FOR THE FILING OF REBUTTAL ARGUMENTS FOR CITY MEASURES
SUBMITTED AT MUNICIPAL ELECTIONS"
DISCUSSION: In June, 1978, the voters of California adopted Proposition 13 (now
Article XIII..Aof the California Constitution), which placed limitations on the taxation
powers of state and local governments. Less than eighteen months afterwards the
voters adopted Proposition 4, sometimes better known as the Gann Initiative (now
contained in Article XIII.B of the California Constitution), Proposition 13 was generally
aimed at controlling property taxes and the imposition of new "special taxes." The
thrust of the Gann Initiative, however, was toward placing certain limitations on the
growth of appropriations at both the state and local government level; in particular,
it places limits on the authorization to expend the "proceeds of taxes."
The Gann Initiative provided that beginning with the 1980-1981 Fiscal Year, "an
appropriations limit" would be established for each local government. Appropriations
may not be made in excess of this limit, and revenues received in excess of the
appropriations limit must be returned to the tax payers within the following two fiscal
years.
The appropriations limit for the 1980-1981 Fiscal Year was established to be the
appropriations for that same entity for the 1978-79 Fiscal Year, with certain
adjustments for changes in the cost of living, population and financial responsibility
for providing services. In succeeding years, the appropriations limit would be equal
to the prior year's appropriation limit, subject to the same adjustments. Appropriation
limits may be changed by the voters, but not to exceed a period longer than four
years.
While billed as a flexible way to provide discipline in government spending, the Gann
Initiative does not limit the ability to expend government funds collected from all
sources. Rather, the appropriations limit only limits the authority to expend funds
which are the "proceeds of taxes."
Generally, the proceeds of taxes includes (i) tax revenues, (ii) regulatory fees that are
in excess of the cost to provide the service, (iii) investment of tax revenues and (iv)
subventions from the state. It does not include special assessments nor franchise
fees.
Since the appropriations limit under the Gann Initiative was based upon the historical
appropriations made during the 1978-79 Fiscal Year, it was necessary for the
Legislature to adopt special provisions to address new cities. That procedure begins
with LAFCO initially establishing a temporary appropriations limit for new cities, which
is approved by the voters at the incorporation election. This has previously been done
for Temecula.
Subsequently, the City council is required under Government Code Section 56842.6
to submit the City's permanent appropriations limit for voter approval at the first
municipal election, following the first full fiscal year of operations. The amount of that
limit is to be determined according to the amount of revenue actually received by the
City from the proceeds of taxes for the first full fiscal year of operation, as adjusted
for the change in the cost of living and population in the next full fiscal year of
operation.
Pursuant to Resolution No. 92-49, the COuncil has previously established the amount
of the City's appropriations limit for the City's third full fiscal year 1992-93 in the
amount of $10,109,911.00.
It is now necessary that the City establish its permanent appropriation limit at the
municipal election. Accordingly, it is requested that the Council place the
establishment of the City's permanent appropriations limit on the November 3, 1992
Ballot. It is further requested that the City Council select one or more
Councilmembers to write the ballot arguments in favor of or against that
appropriations limit, authorize the City Attorney to prepare an impartial analysis of the
ballot measure; and, authorize the filing of rebuttal arguments.
The schedule for submission of arguments will be as follows:
· Impartial Analysis - July 24, 1992
· Arguments in Favor of or Against the Ballot Measure - July 24, 1992
· Reply Arguments - August 3, 1992
FISCAL IMPACT: Approximately $500.00, representing the cost for conducting the
election on the ballot measure. This amount has been included in the FY1992-93
budget.
ATTACHMENTS: June 9, 1992 staff report and Resolution No. 92-49, establishing
City's Gann appropriations limit for Fiscal Year for 1992-93. Resolutions regarding
Ballot Measure.
RESOLUTION NO. 92-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, GIVING NOTICE OF THE
SUBMISSION TO THE VOTERS OF A QUESTION RELATING TO
THE APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT OF THE CITY, TO BE
CONSIDERED AT THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE
HELD ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 3, 1992
WHEREAS, in 1978, the voters of the State of California adopted Proposition 4, which
added Article XIII.B to the California Constitution, better known as the Gann Initiative;
WHEREAS, the purpose of the Gann Initiative was to place certain limitations on the
growth of appropriations at both the state and local governmental level; inparticular, it places
an appropriations limit on the authority of cities to expend the "proceeds of taxes";
WHEREAS, the term "proceeds of taxes" refers generally to: (i) all tax revenues; (ii)
excessive regulatory license fees and user charges; (iii) the investment of tax revenues; and (iv)
subventions from the State;
WHEREAS, in the case of new cities it is necessary that the voters of the city establish
the city's permanent appropriations limit at the first municipal election following the first full
fiscal year of operations;
WHEREAS, the first such general municipal election has been called on November 3,
1992, for the election of Municipal Officers; and
WHEREAS, the City Council also desires to submit to the voters at the election a
question relating to setting the appropriations limit of the City;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA,
CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTIQN 1. That the City Council, pursuant to its right and authority, does order
submitted to the voters at the General Municipal Election the following question(s):
SHALL THE PERMANENT APPROPRIATIONS
LIMIT FOR THE .CITY OF TEMECULA FOR
FISCAL YEAR 1992-93 BE SET AT $10,109.9117
YES
NO
~ 5/Resos263 -I -
SECTION 2. That the proposed measure submitted to the voters is as follows: Shall the
Permanent Appropriations Limit for the City of Temeeula for Fiscal Year 1992-93 be set at
$10,109,911.9
SECTION 3. That the ballots to be used at the Election shall be in form and content as
required by law.
SECTION 4. That the City Clerk is authorized, instructed and directed to procure and
furnish any and all official ballots, notices, printed matter and all supplies, equipment and
paraphernalia that may be necessary in order to properly and lawfully conduct and election.
SECTION 5. That in all particulars not recited in this resolution, the election shall be
held and conducted as provided by law for holding municipal elections.
SECTION 6. That the City Clerk is authorized, instructed and directed to give further
or additional notice of the election, in time, form and manner as required by law.
SECTION 7. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this
Resolution and enter it into the book of original Resolutions.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON
,1992.
ATrEST:
Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
5/Resos263 -2- ""'
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA)
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the Ciiy of Temecula, HEREBY DO CERTIFY that the
foregoing Resolution No. 92- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the
City of Temecula on the day of ,1992, by the following roll call vote.
AYES:
C OUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS;
June S. Greek, City Clerk
~ 5/Resos263 -3-
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA., PROVIDING FOR THE FILING OF
REBUTTAL ARGUMENTS FOR CITY MEASURES SUBMITTED AT
MUNICIPAL ELECTIONS
WHEREAS, A General Municipal Election is to be held in the City of Temecula,
California, on November 3, 1992, at which there will be submitted to the voters the following
measure:
"SHALL THE PERMANENT APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR THE CITY
FOR FISCAL YEAR 1992-93 BE SET AT $10,109,911"?
WHEREAS, Section 4015.5 and 5014.5 of the Elections Code of the State of California
authorizes the City Council, by majority vote, to adopt provisions to provide for the filing of
rebuttal arguments for city measures submitted at municipal elections;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA,
CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That pursuant to Sections 4015.5 and 5014.5 of the Elections Code of the
State of California, when the Clerk has selected the arguments for and against the measure which
will be printed and distributed to the voters, the clerk shall send copies of the argument in favor
of the measure to the authors of the argument against, and copies of the argument against to the
authors of the argument in favor. The authors may prepare and submit rebuttal arguments not
exceeding 250 words. The rebuttal arguments shall be filed with the City Clerk not more than
10 days after the final date for filing direct arguments. Rebuttal arguments shall be printed in
the same manner as the direct arguments. Each rebuttal argument shall immediately follow the
direct argument which it seeks to rebut.
SECTION 2. That the provisions of SECTION 1 shall apply only to the election to be
held on November 3, 1992, and shall then repealed.
SECTION 3. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this
Resolution and enter it into the book of original Resolutions.
-- 5/Resos265 -1-
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON
,1992.
ATTEST:
Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA)
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, HEREBY DO CERTIFY that the
foregoing Resolution No. 92- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of
the City of Temecula on the __ day of , 1992, by the following roll call vote:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
C OUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
5/R~sos265 -2- ~-
RESOLUTION NO. 92-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF TF, MECULA, CALIFORNIA,. SETtING
PRIORrrlES FOR FILING WRITTEN ARGUMENTS
REGARDING A CITY MEASURE AND DIRECTING
THE CITY ATTORNEY TO PREPARE AN IMPARTIAL
ANALYSIS
WHEREAS, a General Municipal Election is to be held in the City of Temecula,
California, on November 3, 1992, at which there will be submitted to the voters the following
measure:
"SHALL THE PERMANENT APPROPRIATION LIMIT FOR
THE CITY FOR FISCAL YEAR 1992-93 BE SET AT
$10,109,911"?
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA,
CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERIvfi/qE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the City Council authorizes
Mayor Patrich H. Birdsall
(Councilmember in Favor)
Mayor Pro Tem Karel Lindemans
(Councilmember in Favor)
Peg Moore
(Councilmember in Favor)
J. Sal Mu~oz
(Councilmember in Favor)
Ronald J. Parks
(Councilmember in Favor)
any or all members of that body, to file written arguments regarding the City measure as
specified above in accordance with Article 4, Chapter 3, Division 5 of the Elections Code of the
State of California and to change the argument until and including the date fixed by the City
Clerk after which no arguments for or against the City measure may be submitted to the City
Clerk.
Section 2. That the City Council directs the City Clerk to transmit a copy of the measure
to the City Attorney. The City Attorney shall prepare an impartial analysis of the measure
showing the effect of the measure on the existing law and the showing the effect of the measure
on the existing law and the operation of the measure. The impartial analysis shall be filed by
the date set by the City Clerk for the filing of primary arguments.
~ 5/R~264 -1-
Section 3. That the City Clerk shali certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution
and enter it into the book of original Resolutions.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON
,1992.
AITF~T:
Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor
June S. Greek; City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
C1TY OF TEMECULA)
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, HEREBY DO CERTIFY that the
foregoing ResOlution No. 92-__ was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of
the City of Temecula on the day of , 1992, by the following roll call vote;
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
ITEM NO. 6
APPROVAL:
CITY ATFORNEY
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Council/City Manager
Building and Safety Department
July 14, 1992
Contract Agreement for Street Address Numbering
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council approve a contract agreement with Mr. Bruce Stewart,
3155 Mr. Vernon Avenue, Riverside, CA 92501, (714) 784-8484, to renew existing contract to
provide address numbering services on an as-needed basis.
DISCUSSION:
The Building and Safety Department has utilized the services of a consultant to provide the City
with the service of assigning street address numbers for new development projects. Staff has
utilizlxl Mr. Blllce Stewart to perform these services and recommends this contract be renewed
for Fiscal '92-'93. Mr. Bruce Stewart has agreed to provide this supplemental service on an
needed basis for compensation at the rate of twenty ($20) dollars per hour, the same
compensation awarded in the previous contract. Mr. Bruce Stewart has had experience with the
County of Riverside and has provided street addressing under the program which has also been
established in the City.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Monies have already been appropriated in the Fiscal Year 1992 - 1993 budget in account #001-
162-99942-5250 for this service. Sufficient funds exist to complete this project within this
existing account.
v:\wp~,enda.~t~.cm714.STW
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
This Agreement was made and entered into this ~St day of JUly 1992, by and
between the City of Temecula '("City"), a municipal corporation, and Bruce Stewart , an
address numbering service ("Consultant").
The parties hereW mutually agree as follows:
1. S~rvices. Consultant shall perform the tasks set forth in Exhibit A attached
hereto. Consultant shall complete the tasks according to the schedule set forth in Exhibit A.
2. l~fformance. Consultant shall at all times, faithfully, industrlnll y and to the
best of his ability, experience and talent, perform all tasks described herein.
3. l~nnent. The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, rams set forth in
Exhibit B attached hereto.
Consultant will submit invoices monthly for actual services performed. Invoices shall
be submitted on or about the first business day of each month, for services provided in the
previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice.
4. Amendments. This Agreemere may be mended so long as such amendment is
in writing and agreed upon by beth the City Council and Consultant.
5. Ownership Of Documents. Upon satisfactory completion of, or in the event of
termination, suspension or abandonment of, this Agreement, all original documents, designs,
drawings and notes prepared in the course of providing the services to be performed pursuant
w this Agreement shall become the sole property of the City and may be used, reused or
otherwise disposed of by the City without the permission of the Consultant.
6. Termination. The City may termirate this Agreement without cause so long as
written notice of intent W terminate is given to Consultant at least ten (10) working days
prior to the termination date. In the event of termination, Consultant shall be paid for the
services performed.
7. Indemnification. The Consultant agrees to' indemnify and save harmless the
City of Temecula, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and
all claims, demands, losses, defense cost, or liability of any kind or nature which the City,
its officers, agents and employees may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them
for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of Consultants acts or
omissions under the terms of this Agreement, excepting only liability arising out of the sole
negligence of the City.
V:~WI~GR-~.STE ~
8. Slams of Consultant. Consultant is an independent contractor in all respects in
the performance of this Agreement and shall not be considered an employee of the City for
any purpose. No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with the
performance of this Agreement.
Except as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other
compensation to Consultant for performing services hemunder for City. City shall not be
liable for compensation or indemnification to Consultant for injury or sickness arising out of
performing services hereunder.
9. T;rm. This Agreement shall commence on July 1, 1992, and shall remain
and continue in effect until tasks described heroin are completed, but in no event later than
June 30,199_~.
10. SUbcontracts. The Consultant shall not enter into any subcontracts for services
to be rendered tOward the completion of the Consultant's portion of this Agreement without
the consent of the City. At all times, Bruce Stewart shall be primarily responsible for the
performance of the ta~ks described herein.
11. D~fault. In the event that Consultant is in default for cause under the terms of
this Agreement, the City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating
Consultant for any work performed after the date of default. Default shall include not
performing the tasks described heroin to the reasonable satisfaction of the City Manager of
the City. Failure by the Consultant W make progress in the performance of work hereunder,
ff such failure arises out of causes beyond his control, and without fault or negligence of the
Consultant, shall not be considered a default.
Any disputes regarding performance, default or other matters in dispute
between the City and the Consultant arising out of this Agreement or breech thereof, shall be
resolved by arbitration. The arbitrator's decision shall be final.
Consultant shall select an arbitrator from a list provided by the City of three
retired judges of the Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services, Inc. The arbitration
hearing shall be conducted according to California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1280, et
Sell. City and Consultant shall share the cost of the arbitration equally.
12. Notices. Notices shall be given pursuant to this Agreement by personal service
on the party to be notified, or by written notice upon such party deposited in the custody of
the United States Postal Service addressed as follows:
V:~WI~OR4B.STI!
a. !c ty:
Attention: City Manager
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Teme~ula, CA 92590
Bruce Stewart
3155 Mt. Vernon Avenue
Riverside, CA 92501
The notices shall be deemed to have been ffiven as of the date of personal
service, or three (3) days after the date of deposit of the same in the custody of the United
States Postal Service.
13. l:Vtire Affreement. This Agreement and any documents or instrument attached
hereto or referred to herein inte~mle all terms and condilions mentioned herein or incidental
hereto supersede all negotiations and prior writing in re~ to the subject matter hereof.
In the event of conflict between the terms, conditions, or provisions of this
Agreement and any such document or instrument, the terms and conditions of this Agreement
shall prevail.
14. Liabilil~. Except as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries,
wages, or other compensation to Consultant for performing services hereunder for City.
City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Consultant for injury or
sickness arising out of performing 'services hereunder.
Consultant shall maintain limits of insurance no less than as listed below. In
addition, insurance certificates and endorsements must be completed and attached.
Automobile Liability: $300,000 combined single limit per accident for bodily
injury and propony damage.
The parties hereW have executed this Agreement on the date and year above written.
CONSULTANT
CITY OF TEMBC~
By:
By:
Title Patrich H. Birdsall, Mayor
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Scott F. Field, City Attorney
V:~WI~AOR-O~ .STE
EXHIBIT A
TASKS TO BE PERFORMEr~
It is agreed that Mr. Bruce Stewart will provide address numbering on an as-needed basis for
residential and commercial development throughout the City of Temecula.
V:~WI~AOR-O~.STE
EXHIBIT B
PAYlV~NT SCB'Rn~ .~
It is agreed that Mr. Brace Stewart, 3155 Mt. Vernon Avenue, Riverside, CA 92501, (714)
784-8484, will provide address numbering on an as-needed basis for residential and
commercial development throughout the City of Temecula at the rate of twenty ($20.00)
dollars per hour.
V:\W!~AOR-OL~'TB
ITEM NO. 7
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
Mary Jane Henry, Finance Officer
July 14, 1992
Award Audio-Video Services Contract
Prepared by Grant M. Yates, Senior Management Analyst
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council award a contract to Davlin to provide
audio-video services for City Council and Planning Commission meetings.
DISCUSSION: The City sent out Requests for Proposals to 13 firms
experienced in providing professional audio-video services. The City received five
proposals to provide this service as follows:
Video Audio Monthly
Company Service Quote Service Quote Total
Davlin $130 $ 700 $1,660
Professional Video 250 950 2,400
RPS Video 150 750 1,800
Group I 300 750 2, 1 O0
Geocomm 900 3,600 9,000
After receiving the proposals, the City convened a selection committee made up of
representatives from Inland Valley Cablevision and City staff representatives, Joe
Hreha and Grant Yates. Based upon the results of the process and based upon the
price proposals, staff is recommending that the City enter into an agreement with
Davlin. The agreement will be for one year with the option of three additional years
based upon successful performance. This long term contract is being recommended
because this will allow Davlin to purchase additional cameras, lighting and technical
equipment which will improve the quality of the broadcast. In addition, staff is
working with the Temecula Town Association to place a curtain behind the stage
where the City Council is seated. This curtain will provide for a darker background
which will produce better broadcast quality.
This contract also provides that Davlin audio tape Planning Commission meetings. As
a cost cutting measure the City will have a staff representative from the City Clerk's
Department audio tape the remaining Commission and Committee meetings.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The funds for this service are .included in the
FY 1992-93 Operating Budget
ITEM NO. 8
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER ~
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Council/City Manager
/~Department of Public Works
July 14, 1992
Solicitation of Bids for the Acquisition of Street Striping and Street
Legend Painting Contract
PREPARED BY: i~q~ Brad Buron, Maintenance Supervisor
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit public bids for the
annual street striping and street !egend painting contract.
BACKGROUND:
The '1992-1993 program of services for the Public Works Maintenance Division includes the
re-striping and painting of street legends twice per year in order to insure visibility and
reflective street striping and legends. The contract for the re-striping and painting of legends
is large enough that the request for bid proposals must be advertised and sealed bids received
in order to determine the lowest responsible bidder.
FISCAL IMPACT:
$150,000 is included in the FY 92-93 budget in Account No. 100-164-999-5410 for striping
and stenciling..
Attachments:
1. Exhibit "A"
2. Exhibit "B"
3. Exhibit "C"
4. Exhibit "D"
Pw02\agdrpt~92\0714\striping.bid 0707
EXHIBIT "A"
SCOPE OF WORK - GENERAL CONDITIONS
REFRIFNCI=D SPFCIRCATIONS
:Standard Specifications - The 'Standard Specifications for Public Works
.Construction" of the Amedcan Public Works Association, 1982 Edition, and all
subsequent amendments, supplements end additions.
State Standard Specifications - The "Standard Specifications of the State of
California, Department of Transportation' dated January 1988, and all
subsequent amendments or additions.
ASTM Designations The latest revised specifications or tentative
specifications of the California Department of Transportation Traffic Manual.
de
AASHO Designations - The latest revised specifications of the State Highway
Officials.
Intent:
It is The intent of these specifications and related drawings that work performed under
the Contract shall result in a complete operating system in satisfactory working
condition with respect to the functional purpose of the work to be performed.
Should a conflict arise between these specifications and any referenced specifications,
these specifications shall have precedence. All referenced specifications are part of
the Contract Documents controlling the work as herein specified, but otherwise are not
applicable.
DERNITIONS
a. City: City of Temecula.
b8
Days: Where the word "days" appears in the specifications, it shall mean
consecutive calendar days, unless otherwise noted.
City Engineer:. The City Engineer of the City of Temecula, acting personally or
Through agents or assistants duly authorized by him.
hts,,c~toc. The engineering or technical personnel authorized to act as agents
for The City Engineer in The supervision of work covered by these specifications,
limited to the particular duties entrusted to him or them.
Exhibit "A '
pw01%bid-docs~maint%exh-A&B.mst
e
e
ee
Working days: Any day except Saturdays, Sundays, or legal holidays and days
on which the Contractor is specifically required by the Special Provisions, by
his labor contract, or by law, to suspend construction operations. Also
excepted is any day on which the COntractor is prevented by inclement
weather, or conditions resulting therefrom, from proceeding with at least 75
percent (75%) of the normal labor and equipment forces for at least five (5)
hours toward completion of the current controlling operations.
The City Engineer shall have general supervision and direction of the work and may be
represented on the work by a duly authorized resident engineer or inspector. All claims
of the Contractor and questions which may arise as to quality or acceptability of
materials furnished and work performed and as to the manner of performance and the
rate of progress of the work; and all questions as to the interpretation of the Contract,
Contract specifications; all questions as to the acceptable fulfillment of the Contract
on the part of the Contractor and all questions as to compensation shall be referred to
the City Engineer for decision. His decision shall be final and conclusive.
WORK TO BE DONE
a8
The work to be done consists of furnishing all labor, materials, methods or
processes, implements, tools, and machinery necessary for and appurtenant to
the completion of the work in accordance with the Contract, and to leaving the
site in a neat, clean, and orderly condition upon completion of the work.
be
The City reserves the right to require the performance of extra work when, in
the opinion of the City Engineer, it is necessary or desirable for the property
completion of the Contract.
REMOVAL OF OBSTRUCTIONS
The Contractor shall remove and dispose of al debris, or other obstructions to the
performance of the work as specified.
INTI~PRETATION OF SPE~CIRCATIONS
Should it appear that the work to he done or any matter relative thereto is not
sufficiently detailed or explained for by the specifications, the Contractor shall apply
to the City Engineer for such further explanation as may be necessary and shall
conform to such explanation or interpretation as part of the Contract so far as may be
consistent with the intent of the original specifications.
INSPECTION
The City Engineer shall at all times have access to the work and shall be furnished with
every reasonable facility for acquiring full knowledge respecting the progress,
workmanship, and character of materials used and employed in the work.
Exhibit "A" - 2- pwOl%bid-doce~naint%exh-A&B.met
10.
11.
Whenever the Contractor varies the period during which work is carried on each day,
he shall give due notice to the City Engineer so that proper inspection may be
provided. Any work done in the absence of the City Engineer will be subject to
rejection.
The insFection of the work shall not relieve the Contractor of any of his obligations to
fulfill the Contract as prescribed. Defective work shall be made good, and unsuitable
materials may he rejected notwithstanding the fact that such defective work and
unsuitable materials have been previously overlooked by the City Engineer and
accepted.
DEFECTrIVE AND UNAUTHORIZED WORK
All work which is defective in its construction or deficient in any of the requirements
of the Flans and specifications shall he remedied or removed and replaced by the
Contractor in an acceptable manner at his own expense. No compensation will be
allowed=for any work done beyond the plans or established by the City Engineer. Upon
failure on the part of the Contractor to comply forthwith with any order of the City
Engineer, made under the provisions of this article, the City Engineer and the City may
cause the defective work to be remedied or removed and replaced at the expense of
the Contractor.
EnUIPMEI~i'
The Contractor must furnish adequate equipment to propedy perform the work in a
workmanlike manner in accordance with these specifications. Such equipment must
be in good state of repair and maintained in such state during the progress of the
work. No worn or obsolete equipment shall be used, and in no case shall the maker's
rating of capacity for any equipment be exceeded.
DISMISSAL OF UNSATISFACTORY EMPLOYEE
If any person employed by the Contractor or any subcontractor shall fail or refuse to
carry out the directions of the City Engineer, or is, in the opinion of the City Engineer,
incompetent, unfaithful, intemperate, or disorderly; or uses threatening or abusive
language to any person on the work representing the City or public; or is otherwise
unsatisfectory, he shall be discharged immediately. Also, he shall not again be
employed on the work except by written consent of the City Engineer.
TERMINATION OF UNSATISFACTORY SUBCONTRACTORS
When any portion of the work which has been subcontracted by the Contractor is not
being prosecuted in a satisfactory manner, the subcontractor for such work shall be
terminated immediately by the Contractor upon written notice from the City Engineer
and shall not again be employed on that type of work in which his performance is
unsatisfactory.
Exhibit 'A" - 3- pw01%bid-doce%maint~exh-A&B.mst
12. FINAL I~I FaNUp
13.
14.
Upon completion end before submitting invoices for payment, the Contractor shall
clean the work site and all ground occupied by him in connection with the work of all
rubbish, excess materials, temporary:structures, and equipment. All part of the work
area shall be left in · neat and presentable condition.
RNAi INSPI:CTION
The Contractor shall notify the City Engineer of the completion of the work and the
City Engineer shall make an inspection of the work. The City Engineer or his agents
will not make the final inspection until the work provided for and contemplated by the
Contractor has been completed and the finel cleanup performed.
Any notice required or given by one party to the other under the Agreement shall be
in writing and shall be dated and signed by the party giving such notice or a duly
authorized representative of such party. Any such Notices shall not be effective for
any purpose whatsoever unless sewed in the following manner, namely: Notice shall
be given to the City and/or Contractor by personal delivery thereof to the City Engineer
or by depositing the same in the United State mail enclosed in a sealed envelope,
registered and with postage prepaid, addressed as follows:
Tim D. Sedet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590-6606
Contractor,
EXCEPTION:
The exception shall be in emergency circumstances. In such cases, the City may give
Notice by verbal telephone communication to the Contractor to proceed with work.
Notices shall be given to the Contractor, by personal delivery thereof to said
Contractor or to his authorized representative at the site of the project, addressed to
said Contractor at the address established for the conduct of the work under this
Agreement, postage prepaid and registered.
Notice shall be given to the Surety, or any other person, by personal delivery to said
Surety or any other parson, or by depositing the same in the United States mail,
enclosed in a sealed envelope addressed to such Surety or persons at the address of
said Surety persons last communicated by him to the party giving the Nodce, postage
prepaid and registered.
Exhibit "A" - 4- pwO1%bid-doce~maint%exh-A&B.met
15.
16.
17.
This Agreement shall be for a period of one ( 1 ) year beginning ,19 ,
and ending the __ day of ,19 , unless terminated or extended as
provided. The City reserves the right of option to extend this Contract and to
renegotiate rates from year to year commencing on the first day of July of each fiscal
year. In no event shell this Contract be extended beyond the day of
,19 .
The possession and/or consumption of alcoholic beverages by contract personnel while
engaged in work activities within the public right-of-way or when engaged in activity
incidental to the performance of duties associated with this Agreement is expressly
prohibited.
The Contractor shall provide the City Engineer with the name and telephone number
of a minimum of three {3) responsible management personnel who may be contacted
by City Engineer for the purpose of notification according to the provisions of the
Agreement.
(Unlisted private numbers may be omitted until swsrd of Contract.)
1. · NAME POSITION
BUSINESS PHONE HOME PHONE
PAGER MOBILE PHONE
2. NAME POSITION
BUSINESS PHONE HOME PHONE
PAGER MOBILE PHONE
3. NAME POSITION
BUSINESS PHONE HOME PHONE
PAGER MOBILE PHONE
Contractor agrees to notify the City immediately both in writing and by telephone, in the event
any of the above names or contact numbers should change.
CONTROL OF MATERIALS
1. rhmrstv Of Materials and Source of Supply.
Articles, msterials, and equipment to be incorporated into the work under the Contract
shell be new and unused unless otherwise specified and shall conform to the
requirements of these specifications and be approved by the City Engineer before
Exhibit "A" - 5- pw01%bid-docsVnaint%exh-A&B.met
incorporation or testa of the City or other authorities incorporated by reference, shall
conform to the respective editions, including amendments, specified, or where editions
are not specified, shall conform to the editions including amendments in effect on the
date of the invitation for bide.
Promptly after the approval of the Contract, the Contractor shall notify the City
Engineer of the proposed sources of supply of all materials to be furnished by him.
At the opU.'on of the City Engineer, the source of supply of each of the materials shall
be approved by him before the delivery is started. All materials proposed for use may
be inspected or tested at any time during their preparation and use. If, after trial, it is
found that sources of supply which have been approved do not furnish a uniform
product, or if the product from any source proves unacceptable at any other time, the
Contractor shall furnish approved material from other approved sources.
After approval, any material which becomes unfit for use due to improper storage,
handling, or any other reason, shall be rejected.
SamNee and Tests.
The Contractor shall furnish such samples of all materials as are requested by the City
Engineer without charge. Samples may be secured and tested whenever necessary to
determine the quality of the material.
Defeclive Materials:
All materials not conforming to the requirements of these specifications shall be
considered as defective and ell such materials, whether in place or not, shall be
rejected and shell be removed immediately from the site of the work unless otherwise
permitted by the City Engineer. No rejected materials, the defects of which have been
subsequently corrected, shall be used until approval in writing has been given by the
City Engineer. Upon failure of the Contractor to comply with any order of the City
Engineer made under the provisions of this article, the City Engineer shall have the
authority to remove and replace defective material and to deduct the cost of removal
and replacement from any monies due or to become due the Contractor.
Stemup of Materials:
All materials for use in the work shall be stored ,by the Contractor in such a manner as
to prevent damage from exposure to the elements, a mixture of foreign materials, or
from any other cause.
Trade Names and Alternatives:
For convenience in designation on the specifications, certain articles or materials to be
incorporated in the work may be designated under a trade name or the name of a
manufacturer and his catalog information. The use of an alternative article or material
Exhibit 'A" - 6- pwO1%bid-doce~maint%exl~A&B.rnet
which iS of equal quality and of the required characteristics for the purpose intended
will be permitted, subject to the following requirements:
The burden of proof as to the quality and suitability of alternatives shall be upon
the Contractor and he shall fumish all information necessary as required by the
City Engineer. The City Engineer shall be the sole judge as to the quality and
suitability of alternative articles or materials and his decision shall be final.
Whenaver the specifications permit the substitution of a similar or equivalent material
or article, no tests or action relating to the approval of such substitute materials will
be made until the request for substitution is made in writing by the Contractor
accompanied by complete data as To the equality of the material or article proposed.
Such a request shall be made within thirty (30) days after the Award of Contract to
permit approval without delaying the work. In no case will an extension of time be
granted because of the Contractor's failure to make such a request in ample time to
complete the work. Approval by the City Engineer of requested alternatives shall be
in writing.
PROSECUTION OF THE WORK
1. Beoinnilm of Work:
After return of the executed contract, together with prescribed bonds and certifications
of insurance, the Contractor may request permission to enter upon the work site and
begin operations. Any work performed by the Contractor in advance of receipt of an
official Notice to Proceed shall be at the Contractor's own risk. The counting of
contract working days shall begin from the date of the Notice to Proceed. Once the
Contractor has started work on the project, he shall diligently prosecute the work to
completion within the timb limit provided.
2. Weekend. Holidev. and Nioht Work:
No work shall be done between the hours of 6:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m., nor on
Saturdays, Sundays, or legal holidays without the permission of the City Engineer.
If work is done at night, the Contractor shall provide adequate light for proper
prosecution of the work, for the safety of the workmen, and the public, and for proper
inspection.
3. Suooestions to the Contractor:
Any plan or method suggested to the Contractor by the City Engineer, but not
specified or required, if adopted or followed in whole or in part, shall be used at the
risk and .responsibility of the Contractor; and the City and the City Engineer will
assume no responsibility therefor.
Exhibit "A" : - 7- pw01%bid-doce~znaint%exh-A&B.rrmt
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day
and year first set forth above.
CONTRACTOR
By
Signature
CITY OF TEMECULA
Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor
Print Name
ATTEST:
JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
SCOTT F. FIELD, City Attomey
Exhibit "A" - 8- pwOl%bid-doceVnaint%exh-A&B.met
EXHIBIT "B"
SPECIFICATIONS FOR
STREET STRIPING AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS SERVICES
General:
The work performed under this Contract shall include the furnishing of all labor,
materials, and equipment necessary to perform street striping and pavement markings
within !the City. All work shall be done in accordance with the current edition of the
Standard Specifications.
Work Orders:
The COntractor shall not start work in the City until he receives e written work order
from the City Engineer, or his assigned staff. The Contractor must have such list in
his possession before starting work. The Contractor shall perform only that work
listed and will only be compensated for the work listed on the work order. The
Contractor shall have the right to accumulate said lists until the contractor has a
sufficient amount of work to warrant sending out a crew; however, in no event shall
any work be held for more than thirty (30) calendar days.
Descrii~tion of the Work:
The work shall consist of the following:
a. Painting reflective centerlines and 'lane lines.
b. Painting reflective pavement markings.
c. Painting reflective crosswalks.
d. Painting parking stalls.
e. Removing of pavement markings and cent,dines or lane lines.
f. :Pre-lining.
Exhibit "B" -9- pw01~bid-do{:e~oontrect~exh-A&B.MASTER
Cent, dine and Lane StriDes:
All centerline and lane stdpes shall be applied in accordance with the State of
California Traffic Manual, 'Painting and Traffic Striping, Pavement Markings and Curb
Markings" as follows: :
1. Cent,dines Detail 1
2. Lanelines Detail 8
e
Pavement Word and Symbol Maddng~:
All lettering unless otherwise indicated shall be eight feet (8') in length elongated in the
direction of traffic. Lettering style shall be as described in the State of California.
"Standard Plans,' 1988 Edition, and shall match existing letters in size and
configuration.
Pavement letters shall be white or yellow as required by the State of California,
'Standard Plans."
Railroad markings and pavement arrows shall be painted white using standard
tamp.ares as described in the current edition of the 'Manual on Uniform Traffic Control
Devices'.
Crosswalks:
Crosswalks shall consist of two (2) parallel solid stripes each twelve feet (12') in
width. Crosswalks shall be either white or yellow as directed by the City Engineer and
shall be placed in accordance with the City's Specifications.
Stoo Bars:
Stop bars shall be white twelve inch (12") wide stripes. Stop limit bars wi~not be
placed at intersections having crosswalks.
SOLVENT BASED PAINT
All paint used for street striping and pavement markings shall be of the pre-
mixed reflectorized quick-dry type paint. Both paints shall have passed the Los
Angeles County test for roadway paints and shall meet the South Coast Air
Quali.ty Management Distdct Rule 1113, containing less than 250 VOC for
Solvent Base Traffic Paint.
Traffic striping and pavement markings shall be applied in one application, at
a rate to obtain a minimum wet film thickness of at least fifteen thousandths
of an inch (0.015").
Exhibit 'B" -10- pw01%bid-doce%contrect\exh-A&B.MASTER
10.
11.
12.
WATER-BASED PAINT
be
In the event that the Contractor is required to use water-based paint materials,
the following APPLICATION PROCEDURE WILL BE FOLLOWED:
The paint shall be applied only when the pavement is dry, the atmospheric
temperature is above 50° F., and the relative humidity is below 85%.
Painting shall not be attempted when there is fog, s forecast of rain, dust that
might settle onto the paint, wind of sufficient strength to blow paint spray onto
adjacent areas, or while heavy traffic is present.
Re-Stdnln-:
All re-striping and re-painting of existing traffic Stripes and pavement markings shall
coincide with the original paintings, regardless of other more restrictive requirements
of these special Provisions unless otherwise indicated.
Removtl of Marldnes:
Removal of markings shall be accomplished by wet sandblasting. Errors made by the
Contractor shall be removed at no additional cost to the City. Upon written direction
of the City Engineer, pavement markings may be removed by blacking out with black
paint.
PreDsra~on:
It shall be the responsibility of the Contractor to insure that prior to any pavement
marking that the surface be clear of all debris.
Traffic~ntrol:
The Contractor shall make every effort to assure the safety of vehicular and pedestrian
traffic during his operations. The current edition of the "Work Area Traffic Control
Handbook", published by Building News, Inc., is herein adopted as the minimum safety
guidelines in conjunction with the Traffic Manual issued by the State of California
Department of Transportation. Contractor shall not close any street within the City
without first obtaining the approval of the City Engineer.
Exhibit "B" - 11 - pw01 ~bid-doce%contract~exh-A&B.MASTER
EXHIBIT 'C"
FY 1992/1993 STREET STRIPING
AND
PAVEMENT MARKING SERVICES RATE SCHEDULE PER CYCLE
e
The quarttitles given in the proposal and contract form are approximate, being given
as a bids for the comparison of bids only, and the City does not expressly or by
implication, agree that the actual amount of work will correspond therewith, but
reserves the right to increase or decrease the amount of any class or portion of the
work, or to omit any portion of the work, as may be deemed advisable or necessary
by the City Engineer.
RefiecfNe Cemedine and: ,,he t aries
UNIT PRICE TOTAL
4' Broken Lines, 225,000 L.F. (single
traffic stripe), and shall include all solid
lane lines approximately 50' from all
intersections. Detail 1 and Detail 8, State
of California Traffic Manual·
$ ILF $
be
4" Solid Line 100.000 L.F. (edge
markings - lane delineation). Detail 24
and Details 27A and 27B, State of
California Traffic Manual
$ ILF $
Two 4" Double Solid 125,000 L.F. lines
w13" Black Separation (2-way barrier
stripe). Detail 21, State of California
Traffic Manual
$ ILF $
8" Solid Lines 30,000 L.F.
Detail 38A. State of California Traffic
Manual
One-way barrier 6,000 L.F. Stripe (for no-
passing in one direction or another).
Detail 15, State of California Traffic
Manual
$ /LF $
$ ILF $
Exhi bit "C" - 12- p wo 1 \bid-docs\contraot%exh-A&B. MASTER
g.
h.
i.
6" white solid lane
'6" white dashed lane
Bike Route legend
Two-way left turn lane 125,000 L.F.
Detail 31, State of California Traffic
Manual
ILF
ILF $
ILF $
Stencib - Re~ec6ve:
ae
8' Letters - 600 each.
Pages A-24C and A-24D,
California Standard Plans
State of
Limit Bars 12" wide - 2,000 L.F. (12'
lines)
de
Arrows - 150 each.
Pages A-24A and A-24B,
California Standard Plane
State of
Speed Limit Legends - 250 each
CrossWalks - Refieclive:
a. 12" wide (See appendix I), 10,000 L.F.
Markim Removal:
a. Wet Sandblasting, sq. ft.
mackoUt:
a, square Foot,
EA $
ILF $
EA $
/LF
ISF $
/SF $
Exhibit "C' -13- pwO1%bid-doce\contrect%exl~A&B.MASTER
(Including layout, assignment,
and spotting.)
Raise Pavement Markera
a. Removals and Replacements
ILF $
/LF $
GRAND TOTAL:
Exhibit "C" -14- pwO1%bid-doos\contreot\exh-A&B.MASTER
EXHIBIT "D"
CONTRACTOR INFORMATION
The Bidder shell furnish the following information.
necessary:
NAME
ADDRESS
TELEPHONE
1. Type of Firm: Individual
(check one)
Partnership
Corporation
Additional sheets may be attached, if
Contractor's License: State
Number
Please print the name end title of all members of the firm:
NAME TITLE
Be
Number of years es a contractor in construction of this type:
years
List three {3) projects of this type recently completed:
contra~i=. :.. ===.:i.. Type=. of PrOject ::. i:'i'=. ;: iDat,:..i.=......... 0~ner's Namei &' Ad~ir~,~'''=''
'cO i~ d .... "':'
Amount E:.: :...: ::: ........ m ete .:. · .: :.' .... . .... :
Exhibit "D" -15- pwO1%bid-doce%maint\exh-a&b.mst 0612
Person who inspected the site of the proposed work for your firm:
Name:
Date of Inspection: ~
NOTE: If requested by the City, the Bidder shall furnish a notarized financial
statement, references, and other information sufficiently comprehensive to permit an
appraisal of his current financial condition.
Exhibit ' D" -16- pwol %bid-doce%meint\exh-a&b.met 0612
ITEM NO. 9
APPROVAL
CITY ATTO~EY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
City Council/City Manager
Department of Public Works
DATE: July 14, 1992
SUBJECT:
Solicitation of Bids for the Acquisition of Street Name Signs and Traffic
Signs
PREPARED BY: tb~/Brad Buron, Maintenance Supervisor
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit public bids for the
acquisition of Street name signs and traffic signs.
BACKGROUND:
Each year the Public Works Maintenance Division expends several thousand dollars for the
acquisition of manufactured street name signs and traffic warning signs needed to maintain
our existing inventory of approximately 18,000 street name signs and traffic signs.
The contract for the manufacture of these materials is large enough that the request for bid
proposals must be advertised and sealed bids received in order to determine the lowest
responsible bidder.
FISCAL IMPACT:
This item is budgeted for FY 92-93 under Account #100-164-999-42-5244. City Council has
approved the Use of $40,000.00 from the above account for the FY 92-93 Public Works
maintenance program.
PwO2\agdrpt\92\0714\stsign.bid 0707
THE FOLLOWING SIGN LIST IS FOR BIDDING
PURPOSES ONLY. THIS SIGN LIST IS NOT A
CONFIRMED SIGN ORDER.
pwO2%agdrpt\92%0714\stsign.bid 060892
ITEM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
PREPARED BY: )~lbert
RECOMMENDATION:
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Department of Public Works
July 14, 1992
Release of Material and Labor Bonds in Tract No. 23128
K. Crisp, Permit Engineer
That the City Council AUTHORIZE the release of street, and water and sewer system Material
and Labor bortds in Tract No. 23128 and DIRECT the City Clerk to so advise the Clerk of the
Board of Supervisors.
BACKGROUND:
On February 21, 1989 the Riverside County Board of Supervisors entered into subdivision
agreements with:
Radnor/Sunland/Green Meadows Partnership
41877 Enterprise Circle North, Suite 200
Temecula, CA 92590
for the improvement of streets and installation of sewer and water systems. Accompanying
the subdivision agreements were surety bonds, issued by Federal Insurance Company as
follows:
2.
3.
4.
Bond No. 8118 40 87A in the amount of 9362,500.00 to cover street improvements.
Bond No. 8118 40 87A in the amount of 987,500.00 to cover water improvements.
Bond No. 8118 40 87A in the amount of 983,000.00 to cover sewer improvements.
Bond No. 8118 40 87B, in the amounts of 9181,250.00, $43,750.00, and
$41,500.00 respectively, to cover material and labor.
Page 1 pwO5%agdrpt\0714%TR23128 070292
On February 11, 1992, the City Council accepted these improvements and retained the
following secured amounts for a one (1) year maintenance period:
Streets: $36,250.00
Water: : $ 8,750.00
Sewer: $ 8,300.00
The developer is required to post Material and Labor Bonds to ensure payment to suppliers and
workers. These bonds are maintained in effect for a period of time determined by statute
after the Governmental Agency has accepted the public improvements. The Riverside County
Transportation Department and City Staff indicate that no liens have been filed against this
project and with the period in excess of the statutory lien period having run, Staff
recommends that these materials and Labor Bonds be released.
The Faithful Performance Maintenance Bonds will be retained for a full one (1) year warranty
period (February 11, 1993).
The affected streets are Villa Venicia, Cannes Court, Adian Court, Salerno Road, and a portion
of Milano Road.
Attachment
Vicinity Map
Page 2 pwO5\agdrpt~0714\TR23128 070292
~NORTH S&N&RA~
'.KE~RN Y RO, q 0
gano
SEC. 30; T TS i R~ '14I; SBBM
1/I ClNI T Y MAP
NO' SCA L E
ITEM
NO.
11
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Department of Public Works
July 1~, 1992
Final Tract Map No. 22761
PREPARED iBY:
Kris Winchak
RECOMMENDAT ION:
That City Council APPROVE Final Tract Map No. 22761,
subject to the Conditions of Approval.
DISCUSSION:
Tentative Tract Map No. 22761 was originally approved by Riverside County in July
of 1988. The first extension of time was approved by the City of Temecula in
October 1990 and the second extension of time was approved by the City of Temecula
City Counciil on May 26, 1992.
Final Tract Map No. 22761 proposes to subdivide 28 acres into eighty (80) single
family residential lots with a minimum lot size of 7200 square feet. The subject site
is located south of Rancho California Road, west of Ynez Road and easterly of 1-15.
The project is consistent with the approved Specific Plan No. 180
The following fees have been paid (or deferred) for Final Tract Map No. 22761:
* Area Drainage Fees
* Fire Mitigation Fees
* Traffic Signal Mitigation
* Stephen's K-Rat Fees
$ 26,235.80
$ 32,000.00
$12,000.00
$ 5~,892.50
The following bonds have been posted for Final Tract Map No. 22761:
Streets and Drainage
Water
Sewer
Survey Monuments
Signal Mitigation Fee
Recreation Center
FAITHFUL
PERFORMANCE
$476,500.00
197,000.00
183,000.00
OTHER
BONDS
$22,200.00
12,000.00
533,400.00
LABOR AND
MATERIALS
$238,500.00
98,500.00
91,500.00
SUMMARY:
Staff recommends that City Council APPROVE Final Tract Map No. 22761, subject to
the Conditions of Approval.
KW/TN: ks
Attachments:
2.
3.
5.
6.
7.
Development Fee Checklist
Locatien Map
Copy of Map
Planning Commission Staff Report dated 10-21-91.
City Council Agenda Report dated 5-26-92
Conditions of Approval
Fees and Securities Report
ATTACHMENT 1
DEVELOPMENT FEE CHECKLIST
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEVELOPMENT FEE CHECKLIST
Final Tract Map No. 22761
The following fees were reviewed by Staff relative to their applicability to this
project.
Fee
Habitat Conservation Plan
(K-Rat)
Parks and Recreation
( Quimby )
Public Facility
Condition of Approval
Condition No. I from the
First Ext. of Time
Condition No. 10
Condition No. 7
Traffic Signal Mitigation
Condition No. 3
Fire Mitigation
See Fire Department Letter
Dated 5-11-89
Flood Control
( ADP )
Condition No. 5
Staff Findings:
Staff finds, that the project will be consistant with the City's General Plan once
adopted.
The project is part of Specific Plan No. 180.
ATTACHMENT 2
LOCATION MAP
CITY OF TEMECULA
C
Location Map
CASE NO.V'rI,,~
EXHIBIT NO.
ATTACHMENT
COPY OF MAP
3
c:: ,L
.,-,~
/
,\ /
ATTACHMENT 4
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
DATED 10-21-91
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
Octobe~ 21, 1991
Case No.: Second Extension of Time-Tentative Tract Map No. 22761
Prepared By: Mark Rhoades
RECOMMENDATION:
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT:
Coleman Homes
REPRESENTATIVE:
Robert Bein, William Frost & Associates
PROPOSAL:
Eighty (80) lot residential subdivision on 28 acres.
Second Extension of Time.
LOCATION:
Between Rancho California Road and Santiago Road, west
of Ynez Road.
EXISTING ZONING:
Specific Plan 180 (Rancho Highlands)
SURROUNDING ZONING:
North: R-A-5 (Residential Agricultural, 5 acre
minimum)
SP 1.80 (Rancho Highlands)
R-1 (One-Family Dwellings)
I-15 (Interstate 15)
South:
East:
West:
PROPOSED ZONING:
Not requested
EXISTING LAND USE:
Vacant
SURROUNDING LAND USES:
PROJEC~T STATISTICS:
North:
South:
East:
West:
Multi;-Family Residential
Single Family Residential
Single Family Residential
Interstate 15
Total Acreage:
No. of Lots:
Open Space Lots:
Proposed DU/Acre
Proposed Minimum Lot Size:
28
80
1
2.8
7,200 sq.ft.
S%STAR:RPT~2761-2 .TTM 5
BACKGROUND
Tentative Tract No. 22761 was originally approved by Riverside County in July of 1988. The
first time extension was approved by the City of Temecula in October 1990.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Tract Map No. 22761, is a proposal to subdivide approximately 28 acres into eighty (80)
single family residential lots with a minimum lot size of 7,200 square feet. The subject site
is located south of Rancho California Road, west of Ynez Road and easterly of I-15. The
project is consistent with the approved Specific Plan No. 180.
FUTURE GENERAL PLAN AND SWAP CONSISTENCY
The proposed density of 2.8 units per acre is consistent with the Southwest Area Community
Plan. In addition, Staff finds it probable that this project will be consistent with the new
General Plan when it is adopted, because of the existing pattern of area development.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission re-affirm the Environmental Impact Report
No. 177 completed for Specific Plan No. 180.
FINDINGS
There is a reasonable probability that this project will be consistent with the City's
future General Plan, which will be completed in a reasonable time and in accordance
with State law, due to the fact that the project is consistent with existing site
development standards in that it proposes articulated design features and site
amenities commensurate with existing and anticipated residential development
standards.
There is not a likely probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the
future and adopted general plan, if the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent
with the plan, due to the fact that the project is in conformance with existing and
anticipated land use and design guidelines standards.
The proposed use or action complies with state planning and zoning laws, due to the
fact that the proposed use conforms with those uses listed as "allowed" within the
zoning designation of Specific Plan 180.
The site is suitable to accommodate the proposed land use in terms of the size and
shape of the lot configuration, circulation patterns, access, and density, due to the fact
that; adequate area is provided for all proposed residential structures; adequate
landscaping is provided along the project's public and private frontages; and the
internal circulation plan should not create traffic conflicts as design provisions are in
conformance with adopted City standards.
The project as designed and conditioned will not adversely affect the public health or
welfare, due to the fact that the conditions stated in the approval are based on
mitigation measures necessary to reduce or eliminate potential adverse impacts of the
project.
S\STAFFRFT~2781-2.TTM 6
Tentative Tract Map No. 22761 is compatible with surrounding land uses. The
harmony in scale, bulk, height, density and coverage creates a compatible physical
relationship with adjoining properties, due to the fact that the proposal is similar in
compatibility with surrounding land uses; and adequate area and design features
provide for siting of proposed development in terms of landscaping and internal traffic
circulation.
The proposal will not have an adverse effect on surrounding property because it does
not represent a significant change to the present or planned land use of the area, due
to the fact that the proposed project is consistent with the current zoning of the
subject site.
The project as designed and conditioned will not adversely affect the built or natural
environment as determined in the EIR for the project, due to the fact that impact
mitigation is realized by conformance with the project's Conditions of Approval.
The project has acceptable access to a dedicated right-of-way which is open to, and
useable by, vehicular traffic, due to the fact that the project currently proposes access
points from Ynez Road which have been determined to be adequate by the City
Engineer.
10.
The design of the subdivision, the type of improvements and the resulting street layout
are such that they are not in conflict with easements for access through or use of the
property within the proposed projects, due to the fact that this is clearly represented
in the site plan and the project analysis·
11.
Said findings are supported by minutes, maps, exhibits and environmental documents
associated with is application and herein incorporated by reference, due to the fact
that they are referenced in the attached Staff Report, Exhibits, and Conditions of
Approval.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Department Staff recommends that the
Planning Commission:
ADOPT Resolution 91-__ RECOMMENDING THAT THE
CITY COUNCIL APPROVE The Second Extension of Time
for Tentative Tract No. 22761 based on the Analysis and
Findings contained in the staff report and subject to the
attached Conditions of Approval.
vgw
Attachments:
2.
4.
Resolution - page 8
Conditions of Approval - page 13
Staff Report-First Extension of Time - page 19
Exhibits - page 20
S%STAFFRFT~2761-2.TTM 7
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
RESOLUTION NO. 91-~
S~STAFFRPT'~2761-2.T"~M 8
ATTACHMENT NO. I
RESOLUTION NO. 91-113
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE SECOND EXTENSION OF
TIME FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 22761, An 80 LOT RESIDENTIAL
SUBDIVISION ON 28 ACRES AND KNOWN AS A PORTION OF ASSESSOR'S
PARCEL NO. 923-020-038.
WHEREAS, Robert Bein, William Frost and Associates filed the Time Extension
in accordance with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision
Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference;
WHEREAS, said Time Extension application was processed in the time and
manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered said Time Extension on
December 16, 1991, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in
support or opposition;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, the Commission
recommended approval of said Time Extension.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. Findings
That the Temecula Planning Commission hereby makes the following findings:
Pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly incorporated city shall adopt
a general plan within thirty (30) months following incorporation. During that 30-month
period of time, the city is not subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted
or the requirements of state law that its decisions be consistent with the general plan,
if all of the following requirements are met:
The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of the general
plan.
Be
The planning agency finds, in approving projects and taking other actions,
including the issuance of building permits, each of the following:
(1)
There is a reasonable probability that the Time Extension proposed will
be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied
or which will be studied within a reasonable time.
(2)
There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference
with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is
ultimately inconsistent with the plan.
S\STAFFRPT~2761-2.TTM 9
(3) The proposed use or action complied with all other applicable
requirements of state law and local ordinances.
The Riverside County General Plan, as amended by the Southwest Area Community
Plan, (hereinafter "SWAP") was adopted prior to the incorporation of Temecula as the
General' Plan for the southwest portion of Riverside County, including the area now
within the boundaries of the City. At this time, the City has adopted SWAP as its
General Plan guidelines while the City is proceeding in a timely fashion with the
preparation of its General Plan.
The proposed Time Extension is consistent with the SWAP and meets the requirements
set forth in Section 65360 of the Government Code, to wit:
The City is proceeding in a timely fashion with a preparation of the general
plan.
The Planning Commission finds, in approving projects and taking other actions,
including the issuance of building permits, pursuant to this title, each of the
following:
(1)
There is reasonable probability that the Time Extension proposed will be
consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or
which will be studied within a reasonable time.
(2)
There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference
with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is
ultimately inconsistent with the plan.
(3) The proposed use or action complies with all other applicable
requirements of state law and local ordinances.
Pursuant to Section 18.30(c), no Time Extension may be approved unless the following
findings can be made:
A. The proposed use must conform to all the General Plan requirements and with
all applicable requirements of state law and City ordinances.
The proposed subdivision does not affect the general health, safety, and
welfare of the public.
The Planning Commission, in recommending approval of the proposed Time
Extension, makes the following findings, 'to wit:
(1)
There is a reasonable probability that this project will be consistent with
the City's future General Plan, which will be completed in a reasonable
time and in accordance with State law, due to the fact that the project
is consistent with existing site development standards in that it
proposes articulated design features and site amen,ties commensurate
with existing and anticipated residential development standards.
S~STAFFRPT~2761-2.TTM I 0
(2)
{3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
There is not a likely probability of substantial detriment to or
interference with the future and adopted general plan, if the proposed
use or action is ultimately inconsistent with the plan, due to the fact
that the project is in conformance with existing and anticipated land use
and design guidelines standards.
The proposed use or action complies with state planning and zoning
laws, due to the fact that the proposed use conforms with those uses
listed as "allowed" within the zoning designation of Specific Plan 180.
The site is suitable to accommodate the proposed land use in terms of
the size and shape of the lot configuration, circulation patterns, access,
and density, due to the fact that; adequate area is provided for all
proposed residential structures; adequate landscaping is provided along
the project's public and private frontages; and the internal circulation
plan should not create traffic conflicts as design provisions are in
conformance with adopted City standards.
The project as designed and conditioned will not adversely affect the
public health or welfare, due to the fact that the conditions stated in the
approval are based on mitigation measures necessary to reduce or
eliminate potential adverse impacts of the project.
Tentative Tract Map No. 22761 is compatible with surrounding land
uses. The harmony in scale, bulk, height, density and coverage creates
a compatible physical relationship with adjoining properties, due to the
fact that the proposal is similar in compatibility with surrounding land
uses; and adequate area and design features provide for siting of
proposed development in terms of landscaping and internal traffic
circulation.
The proposal will not have an adverse effect on surrounding property
because it does not represent a significant change to the present or
planned land use of the area, due to the fact that the proposed project
is consistent with the current zoning of the subject site.
The project as designed and conditioned will not adversely affect the
built or natural environment as determined in the EIR for the project, due
to the fact that impact mitigation is realized by conformance with the
project's Conditions of Approval.
The project has acceptable access to a dedicated right-of-way which is
open to, and useable by, vehicular traffic, due to the fact that the
'project currently proposes access points from Ynez Road which have
been determined to be adequate by the City Engineer.
The design of the subdivision, the type of improvements and the
resulting street layout are such that they are not in conflict with
easements for access through or use of the property within the
proposed projects, due to the fact that this is clearly represented in the
site plan and the project analysis.
S~STAFFRPT~22761-2.TTM 1 I
(11)
That said findings are supported by minutes, maps, exhibits and
environmental documents associated with these applicants and herein
incorporated by reference, due to the fact that they are referenced in the
attached Staff Report, Exhibits, and Conditions of Approval.
e
As conditioned pursuant to SECTION 2, the Time Extension proposed conforms t'o the
logical development of its proposed site, and is compatible with the present and future
development of the surrounding property.
SECTION II. Environmental Compliance.
That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby determines that the previous
environmental determination Adoption of EIR No. 177 still applies to said Tract Map
(Extension of Time).
SECTION III. Conditions.
That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council
approve the Second Extension of Time for Tentative Tract Map No. 22761 for a 80 Lot
residential subdivision on 28 acres and known as a portion of Assessor's Parcel No. subject
to the following conditions:
1. Exhibit A, attached hereto.
SECTION IV.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 16th day of December, 1991.
JOHN E. HOAGLAND
CHAIRMAN
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 16th day of
December, 1991 by the following vote of the Commission:
AYES: 3
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 2
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS
'PLANNING COMMISSIONER
S~STAFFen'~27e~-2.rrM I 2
ATTACHMENT 5
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
DATED 5-26-92
APPROVAL
/
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Council/City Manager
Planning Department
May 26, 1992
Tentative Tract Map No. 22761, Second Extension of Time
RECO~ATION: The Planning Department Staff recommends that the City Council:
ADOPT Resolution No. 92- upholding the Planning
Commission's approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 22761, Second
Extension of Time based on the Analysis and Findings, contained
in the Staff Report and subject to the attached Conditions of
Appwval.
BACKGROIJND
The proposed Second Extension of Time is for an 80 lot residential subdivision on 28 acres,
located within Raneho Highlands (Spedfie Plan No. 180). The planning Commission
recommended approval of the Second Extension of Time on Dep~mber 16, 1991.
The focus of discussion at the Planning Commission related to Ynez Road improvements and
the construction of the recreation center/park site required by the Specific Plan. The Ynez Road
improvements were conditioned at that hearing to be completed prior to any future certificates
of occupancy for the site. In the intervening months subsequent to Planning Commission
consideration, Staff has been working with the applicant to fmallze park design to satisfy
concerns of the Rancho Highlands Homeowners Association.
In order to address the concerns of Staff and the property ownen adjacent to the project site with
respect to impwving the park, the applicant has agreed to a Condition of Appwval for timing
of the park site construction. The Condition of Appwval approved by the Planning Commission
states that the park site must be fully improved prior to July 1, 1993 or prior to the 250th
certificate of occupancy for the entire Specific Plan area. The applicant has already submitted
and received staff approval for the design of the park site.
s~-T^Fmv,n2x76~-2.ee 1
The planning Commi-~sion recommended approval of the project by a vote of 3-0, wiXh
Commissioners Blair and Fahey absent.
FISCAL IMPACT
None :
Attachments: 1.
'2.
4.
5.
'6.
Resolution - page 3
Conditions of Approval (mended by Planning Commission,
December 16, 1991 ) - page 9
Planning Commission MinUtes (December 16, 1991) page 16
planning Commission Staff~n (December 16, 1991) - page 17
Fee Checklist - page 18
Park Site Exhibit - page 20
SWrAFl:RPTW:761-2.CC
2
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
RESOLLrrION NO.
ATTA~ NO. I
RESOLUTION NO. 92-_
A RESOLUTION OF TB'F~ CITY COUNCH., OF ~ CITY
OF TEMECUIA APPROVING TFrF. SECOND EXTENSION
OF TIME FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 22761 TO
SUBDIVIDE 28 ACRES INTO 80 SINGL~- FAM~,Y
RESIDENTIAL LOTS LOCATED IN THY. RANCHO
HIGn'I-~NDS SPECII~IC PlAN NO. 180, AND KNOWN AS
ASSESSOR'S PARC~-L NO. 923-020-038 (PORTION).
W]:rERF~AS~ Coleman Homes ~ed the Second Extension of Time for Tentative Tract
Map No. 22761 in accordance with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and
Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference;
WI:rERF-~,S, said Second Extension of Time for Tentative Tract Map application was
processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local hw;
WI:tl~AS, the Planning Commission considered said Second Extension of~ Time for
Tentative Tract Map on December 16, 1991, at which time interested persons had an opportunity
to testify either in support or opposition;
Wlq~.RF~AS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, the Commission
recommended approval of said Second Extension of Time for Tentative Tract Map;
WI:rERI~AS, the City Council considered said Second Extension of Time for Tentative
Tract Map on May 26, 1992, at which time interested persons had an opportunity W testify
either in support or opposition;
WB~'~RFAS, at the conclusion of the Council hearing, the Council approved said
Extension of T'Lrne for Tentative Tract Map No. 22761;
NOW, TFIF~REFORE, TB'F. CITY COUNCIL OF TB'F, CITY OF TEME~
DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1~ Findings. That the Temecula City Council hereby makes the following findings:
A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly incorporated city shall
adopt a general plan within thirty (30) months following incorporation. During that 30-month
period of time, the city is not subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or the
requirements of state hw that its decisions be consistent with the general plan, if all of the
following requirements are met:
general plan.
The city is proce~xling in a timely fashion with the preparation of the
S~TA~61-2.CC 4
2. The p|nnning agency f'mds, in approving projects and taking other actions,
including the issuance of building permits, each of the following:
a. There is a reasonable probability that the land use or action
proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which
will be studied within a reasonable time.
b. There is little or no pwbability of substantial detriment to or
interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately
inconsistent with the plan.
c. The proposed use or action complied with all other applicable
requirements of state law and local ordinances.
B. The Riverside County General Plan, as amended by the Southwest Area
Community Plan, (hereinafter 'SWAP") was adopted prior to the incorporation of Temecula as
the General Plan for the southwest portion of Riverside County, including the area now within
the boundaries of the City. At this time, the City has adopted SWAP as its General Plan
guidelines while the City is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of its General
Plan.
C. The proposed Vesting Tentative Tract Map is consistent with the SW AP'and meets
the requirements set forth in Section 65360 of the Government Code, to wit:
The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with a preparation of the general
plan.
2. The City Council finds, in approving projects and taking other actions,
including the issuance of building permits, pursuant to this rifle, each of the following:
a. There is reasonable probability that the Second Extension of Time
for Tentative Tract Map No. 22761 propose~ wffi be consistent with the general plan proposal
being considered or studied or which will be studied within a reasonable time.
b. There is little or no pwbability of substantial detriment to or
interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately
inconsistent with th~ plan.
c. The proposed use or action complies with all other applicable
requirements of state hw and local ordinances.
D. Pursuant to Seaion 7.1 of County Ordinance No. 460, no subdivision may be
approved unless the foliowing findings are made:
specific plans.
That the proposed land division is consistent with applicable general and
$WrA~61-2.CC 5
2. That the design or improvement of the proposed land division is consistent
With applicable general and specific plans.
3. That the site of the proposed land division is physically suitable for the
type of development.
4. That the site of the proposed land division is physically suitable for the
proposed density of the development.
5. That the design of the proposed land division or proposed improvements
am not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and unavoidably injure
fish or wiidllfe or their habitat.
6. That the design of the proposed land division or the type of improvements
are not likely to cause serious public health problems.
7. That the design of the proposed land division or the type of improvements
will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through, or use of,
property within the proposed land division. A land division my be approved if it is found that
alternate easements for access or for use will be provided and that they will be substantially
equivalent to ones previously acquired by the public. This subsection sbnn apply only to
easements of record or to easements established by judgment of a court of competent
jurisdiction.
E. The Council in approving the proposed Second Extension of Time for Tentative
Tract lVlap No. 22761, makes the following findings, to wit:
1. There is a reasonable probability that this project will be consistent with
the City's future General Plan, which will be completed in.a reasonable time and in accordance
with State law, due to the fact that the project is consistent with existing site development
standards in that it proposes articulated design features and site amenities commensurate with
existing and anticipated residential development standards.
2. There is not a likely probability of substantial detriment to or interference
with the future and adopted general plan, if the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent
with the plan, due to the fact that the project is in conformance with existing and anticipated land
use and design guidelines standards.
3. The proposed use or action complies with state planning and zoning laws,
due to the fact that the proposed use conforms with those uses listed as ~allowed~ within the
zoning designation of .Specific Plan 180.
4. The site is suitable to accommodate the proposed land use in terms of the
size and shape of the lot configuration, circulation panems, access, and density, due to the fact
that; adequate ar~a is provided for all proposed residential structures; adequate landscaping is
provided along the project' s public and private frontages; and the internal circulation plan should
not create traffic conflicts as design provisions are in conformance with adopted City standards.
5. The project as designed and conditioned will not adversely affect the public
health or welfare, due to the fact that the conditions stated in the approval are based on
mitigation measures ne~ssary to reduc~ or eliminate potential adverse impacts of the project.
6. The proposal will not have an adverse effect on surrounding property
because it does not represent a significant change to the present or planned land use of the axea,
due to the fact that the proposed project is consistent with the currant zoning of the subject site.
7. The project as designed and conditioned will not adversely affect the built
or natural environment as determined in tl~ Negative Declaration for the project, due to the fact
that impact mitigation is r~li~ed by conformance with the project' s Conditions of Approval.
8. The project has acceptable access to a dedicated fight-of-way which is open
to, and useable by, vehicular traffic, due to the fact that the project currently proposes access
points from Ynez Road which has been determined to be adequate by the City Engineer.
9. The design of the subdivision, the type of improvements and the resulting
street layout are such that they are not in conflict with easements for access through or use of
the property within the proposed projects, due to the fact that this is clearly represented in the
site plan and 'the project analysis.
10. Said findings are supported by minutes, maps, exhibits and environmental
documents associated with this application and herein incorporated by reference, due to the fact
that they am referenced in the attached Staff Report, Exhibits, and Conditions of Approval.
F. As conditioned pursuant to SECTION 3, the Second Extension of Time for
Tentative Tract Map No. 22761 is compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the
community.
Section 2. Environmental Compliance. An Initial Study prepared for this project indicates that
although the proposed project could have a significant impact on the enviroment, there will not
be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described in the Conditions
of Approval have been added to the project, and the Negative Declaration, therefore, is hereby
realfumed.
SECTION 3. Conditions. That the City Council of the City of Temecula approving the Second
Extension of Time for Tentative Tract Map No. 22761 To subdivide 28 acres into 80 Single
Family Residential lots located in the Rancho Highiands Specific Plan No. 180, and known as
Assessor's Parcel No. 923-020-038 (portion) subject to the foilowing conditions:
Riverside County Conditions of Approval dated August 16, 1989.
City of Temecula Conditions of Approval dated July 18, 1991.
City of Temecula Conditions of Approval dated May 26, 1992.
S~/"A~61-2.CC 7
Section 4.
The City Clerk shall c~rtify tl~ adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPRO~irk'~ AHD ADO~ thi.~ 26th day of May,
1992.
.PATRICIAH. BIRDSAT~-
MAYOR
I H'ER~Ry CERTII~ that the foregoing EP, solution was duly adopted by the City Council of
the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 26th day of May, 1992 by the
foilowing vote ef the Council:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCK.MEM~HRS:
COUNCK2vfEMBERS:
COUNCII3IEMBERS:
JUNES. GREEK
CYI'Y CT:I:n:~
$WrA~61-2.C~ ~
ATTACHMENT 6
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Tentative Tract Map No. 22761
Second Extension of Time
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
The following are the Department of Public Works Conditions of Approval for this project, and
shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All questions regarding the true
meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the appropriate staff person of the Department
of Public Works·
It is understood that the Developer has correctly shown on the tentative map all existing
easements, traveled ways, and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project
to be resubmitted for further review·
The Developer shall comply with all Conditions of Approval as previously imposed or amended
and with the Conditions noted below.
PRIOR TO RECORDATION OF THE FINAL MAP:
Prior to recordation of the final map, said agreement shall require construction and
completion of the recreation center and private park prior to the issuance of the
Certificate of Occupany on the 250th unit in Specific Plan No. 180 or by July 1,1993,
whichever comes first; a 'bond in an amount set by the Public Works Department shall
be provided; prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy of any unit in either
tract, Ynez Road shall be improved with A/C paying.
Pursuant to Section 66493 of the Subdivision Map Act, any subdivision which is part
of an existing Assessment District must comply with the requirements of said section.
e
Prior to recordation of the final map, the developer shall deposit with the Department
of Public Works a cash sum as established, per lot, as mitigation towards traffic signal
impacts. Should the developer choose to defer the time of payment of traffic signal
mitigation fee, he may enter into a written agreement with the City deferring said
payment to the time of issuance of a building permit.
PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT:
A precise grading plan shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review
and approval. The building pad shall be certified by a registered Civil Engineer for
location and elevation, and the Soil Engineer shall issue a Final Soils Report addressing
compaction and site conditions.
A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the prevailing Area
Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new development. The charge is
payable to the Flood Control District prior to issuance of permits. If the full Area
Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already credited to this property, no new
S\STAFFRPT~22761-2.TTM 14
charge needs to be paid.
Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code,
City Grading Standards and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall
be in substantial conformance with the approved rough grading plan.
Developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities imposed
upon the property or proiect, including that for traffic and public facility mitigation as
required under the EIR/Negative Declaration for the project. The fee to be paid shall
be in the amount in effect at the time of payment of the fee. If an interim or final
public facility mitigation fee or district has not been finally established by the date on
which developer requests its building permits for the project or any phase thereof, the
developer shall execute the Agreement for payment of Public Facility fee, a copy of
which has been provided to developer. Concurrently, with executing this Agreement,
developer shall post security to secure payment of the Public Facility fee. The amount
of the security shall be 92.00 per square foot, not to exceed 910,000. Developer
understands that said Agreement may require the payment of fees in excess of those
now estimated (assuming benefit to the project in the amount of such fees). By
execution of this Agreement, developer will waive any right to protest the provisions
of this Condition, of this Agreement, the formation of any traffic impact fee district,
or the process, levy, or collection of any traffic mitigation or traffic impact fee for this
project; orovided that developer is not waiving its right to protest the reasonableness
of any traffic impact fee, and the amount thereof.
Condition No. 12 of the Engineering Department Conditions of the First Extension of
Time, approved by Planning Commission on October 1, 1990, shall be deleted.
TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING
PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ANY ENCROACHMENT PERMITS:
A construction area traffic control plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer
and approved by the City Engineer for any street closure and detour or other disruption
to traffic circulation as required by the City Engineer.
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT:
10.
Prior to RECORDATION of the final map the applicant or his assignee shall pay the fair
market value of 1.04 acres of required parkland to comply with City Ordinance No.
460.93 (Quimby). The amount to be paid shall be determined by TCSD staff within
thirty. (30) days prior to recordation of said map.
11.
Exterior slopes bordering an arterial street may be dedicated to the TCSD for
maintenance following compliance to TCSD standards and completion of the
application process.
S\STAFFRPT~2276)-2.TrM 15
CITY OF TEMECULA
ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Tentative Tract Map No. 22761
First Extension of Time
Commission Approval Date: October 1, 1990
Expiration Date: July 18, 1991
Planning Department
Unless previously paid, prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall
comply with the provisions of Ordinance No. 663 by paying the appropriate fee set
forth in that ordinance. Should Ordinance No. 663 be superseded by the provisions
of a Habitat Conservation Plan prior to the payment of the fee required by Ordinance
No. 663, the applicant shall pay the fee required by the Habitat Conservation Plan as
implemented by County ordinance or resolution. (Amended per Planning Commission
October 1, 1990.)
The subdivider shall submit to the Planning Director verification that Section 10.35 of
Ordinance No. 460 has been previously satisfied or an agreement with CSA 143 which
demonstrates to the satisfaction of the City that the land divider has provided for the
payment of parks and recreation fees in accordance with Section 10.35 of Ordinance
No. 460. The agreement shall be approved by the City Council prior to the recordation
of the final map. (Amended per Planning Commission October 1, 1990.)
No building permits shall be issued by the City for any residential lot/unit within the
project boundary until the developer's successor's-in-interest provides evidence of
compliance with public facility financing measures. A cash sum of one-hundred dollars
($100) per lot/unit shall be deposited with the City as mitigation for public library
development.
Engineering Department
The following are the Engineering Department Conditions of Approval for this project, and
shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All questions regarding the true
meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the Engineering Department.
It is understood that the Developer correctly shows all existing easements, traveled ways, and
drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further
consideration.
The Developer shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act, and all
applicable City Ordinances and Resolutions.
S%,$TAFFRPT~2781-2.TTM 16
5. The developer shall receive written clearance fro.m the following agencies:
Rancho California Water District;
Eastern Municipal Water District;
Riverside County Flood:Control district;
City of Temecula Fire Bureau;
Planning Department;
Engineering Department;
Riverside County Health Department; and
CATV Franchise.
Prior to final map, the subdivider shall notify the City's CATV Franchises of the Intent
to Develop. Conduit shall be installed to CATV Standards at time of street
improvements.
Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and an
encroachment permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office, in addition to
any other permits required.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT:
The subdivider shall submit four prints of a precise grading plan to the Engineering
Department. The plan shall comply with the Uniform Building Code, Chapter 70, and
as may be additionally provided for in these Conditions of Approval. The plan shall be
drawn on 24" x 36" mylar by a Registered Civil Engineer. (Amended per Planning
Commission October 1, 1990.)
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY:
Construct full street improvements including but not limited to, curb and gutter, A.C.
pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway trees and street lights on all interior
public streets.
10. All street improvements shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
11.
Pavement striping, marking, traffic and street name signing shall be installed per
requirements of the City Traffic Engineer.
12.
Developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities imposed
upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public facility mitigation as
required under the EIR/Negative Declaration for the project, in the amount in effect at
the time of payment of the fee. If an interim or final public facility mitigation fee or
district has not been finally established by the date on which Developer requests its
building permits for the project or any phase thereof, the Developer shall execute the
Agreement for Payment of Public Facility Fee, a copy of which has been provided to
Developer. Developer understands that said Agreement may require the payment of
fees in excess of those now estimated (assuming benefit to the project in the amount
of such fees) and specifically waives its right to protest such increase.
S\STAFFRPT%22761-2.TTM I 7
TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING
PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ANY ENCROACHMENT PERMITS:
13.
Traffic striping, marking and street name signing plans shall be designed as directed
by the Department of Public Works.
14.
A construction area traffic control plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer
and approved by the City Engineer for any street closure and detour or other disruption
to traffic circulation as required by the City Engineer.
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT:
15.
Prior to RECORDATION of the final map the appl,icant or his assignee shall .pay the fair
market value of 1.04 acres of required parkland to comply with City Ordinance No.
460.93 (Quimby). The amount to be paid. shall be determined by TCSD staff within
thirty (30) days prior to recordation of said map.
16.
Exterior slopes bordering an arterial street may be dedicated to the TCSD for
maintenance following compliance to TCSD standards and completion of the
application process.
S~,STAFFRP'I~22761-2.TTM 18
RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUBDIVISION
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 22761
DATE: Aggust 16, 1989
MINOR CHANGE NO. 1
STANDARD CONDITIONS
1. The subdivider shall defend, tndemntf , and hold harmless the County of
RIverside, its agents, officerim 8nd Ilnp~oyteS from lny clatm, action, or
proceeding against the County of RIverside or 1as agents, officers, or
employees to attack set aside void or annul an approval of the County
of RIverside, 1as' advisory 'mgenc;es, appeal boards or legislative body
concerning Tract No. 22761, Minor Change No. 1, which action is brought
~ about wtthtn the ttme period provided for tn collfornta Government Code
Sectton 66499.37. The County of Riverside wtll promptly notify the
~ subd4vtder of an SuCh clatm, action, or proceeding agatnst the County of
RIverside and wtl~ cooperate fully in the defense. Zf the County fails to
pranptly nottry the subdivider of any such clatm, action, or proceeding or
fatls to cooperate fully tn the defense, the subotvtder shall not,
~ thereafter, be responsible to defend, Indemnify, or hold harmless the
County of Riverside.
2. The tentative subdivision shall comply with the State of California
Subdivision Map Act and to all the requirements of OrdtMnce 460, Schedule
A, unless nedtiled by the conditions 11sted below.
3. This conditionally approved tantattve map vtll exptre two years after the
County of RIverside loan of Supervisors approval date, unless extended as
provided by Ordinance 460.
The flnal nap shall be prepared by a 11cansad land surveyor subject to 811
the requtreffents of the State of California Subdivision Map Act and
Ordinance 460.
The subdivider shall subeta one copy of a solls report to the RIverside
County Surveyor's Office and tam coptes to the Department of Butldtng and
Safety. The re rt shall address the solls stability and geological
condtllons of ~J~stte.
6. If any gradtrig tl proposed, the subdivider shall submtt one prtnt of
comprehensive gradtrig plan to the Delartaent of Butldtn9 and Safety. The
plan shell caely with the IJntformButldtng Code, Chapter 70, as amended
by Ordinance 457 end as Beybe additionally provtded for tn these
conditions of approval.
TENTATZVE TRACT NO. 2276:Z, Hlnor Change No. 1
Page 2
A grading permit shall be obtatned from the Deparment of Butlding and
Safety prior to commencement of any grading outstale of county maintained
road right of way.
8. Any delinquent property taxes shall be patd prtor to r~cordatton of the
ftnal map.
9. The su}dtvtder shall comply w4th the street improvement recoffrnendattons
outltn~d tn the RIverside County Road Department's letter dated June
1989, i copy of which ts attached.
Legal access as reclutred by Ordinance 460 shall be provided from the tract
map boundary to a County maintained road.
All-road easements shall be offered for dedication to the public and shall
continue tn force unttl the governing body accepts or abandons such
offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved
by the Road Coowntsstoner. Street names shall be subject to approval of
the Road Commissioner.
Easenents, when requtred for roadway slopes, drainage facilities,
utilities, etc., shall be shovm on the final map tf they are lotatolL .'
wtthtn the land division boundary. All offers of dedication a~
conveyances shall be submitted and recorded as directed by the County
Surveyor.
~ter and sad, rage disposal fadllttes shall be Installed tn accordance
wtth the provisions set forth tn the RIverside County Health Department's
letter dated May 12, 1989, a copy of whtch ts attached.
14. The sUbdlvtder shall comply vtth the flood control recommendations
outltn,!d by the RIverside County flood Control Dtstrtct's letter dated
June 1989, a copy of whtch ls attached, Zf the land dtvtston lies
vtthtn ~n adopted flood control dratnage area pursuant to Sectton 10.25 of
OrdtnaRce 460, appro date fees for the construction of area dratnage
facilities shall be co{lected by the Road Comts$toner,
IS. The subdivider shall comply vtth the fire tBprovewent recomendattons
outltned tn the County Ftre Parshal's letter dated P4y :11, 1989, a copy of
uhtch ts atUched.
16. The sMIxlfvfder shall comply tdth the conditions set forth tn the
f nd otter date 17,
Departant of lutldfng and $a etyLa Use Dtvtston's 1 d ~y
1989, I copy of which ts atUched.
17. The subdivider tha11 comply ~th the conditions set forth tn the
Department of Butldlng and $c.~c<~".e_tadtng Dtvtston's letter dated July 20,
1989, a copy of ~tch ts attach~l. ~
TENTATZVE TRACT NO. 22761, Ntnor Change No. 1
Page 3
18. The Subdivider shall comply wtth Caltran's letter dated ~y 12. 1989, a
copy of whtch ts attached.
Z9. Subdivision phastng, tncludtn any propose cmn open space area
lnq~rOvewent phastn , tf applicable. shell be subject to Planntn;
I)eparment. approval. Any proposed phastng shall provtde for adequat~
vehicular access to all lots tn each phase, and shall substantta11.v
confom to the tntent and purpose of the t
subdtv ston approval.
20. The subdivider and all successors tn tnterest shall comply wtth the
proviSIons Of Development Agreement No. 3 and $pectftc Plan No. 180.
21. Lots created by thts subdivision shall co,;ly wtth the following:
a. All lots shall have a ,dntmum stze of 7200 square feet net.
b. All lot length to wtdth rattos shall be tn conformance wtth Sectton
3.8C of Ordinance 460.
c. Corner lots and through lots, tf any. shall be provtded wtth
Iddtttonal area pursuant to Sectton 3.88 of Ordinance 460 and so as
not to conta(n less net area than the least amount of net area tn
non-corner and through lots.
d. Lots created by thts subdivision shall be tn conformante wtth the
development standards of the $.P. zone.
e. Mhen lots are crossed by ml3or publlc uttllty easements, each lot
shall have a net usable area of not less than 3,600 square feet.
exclusive of the uttllty eismnt.
f. 6faded but undeveloped land shall be mtntatned tn a wed-free
Condition and shall be etther planted wtth tntertm landscaping or
of Buildfag and Safety.
22. Prtor to RECORDAT:IN of the ftnal map the following condttSons shall be
sat1 sfied:
Prtor to the recordatton of the ftnal mp the applicant shall su~tt
~ttten clearances to the RIverside Coun~ Road and Survey Department
that all pertinent requirements outltned tn the attached approval
1let.tars fran the follokdng agenctes have been met.
TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 22761, Htnor Change No. 1
Page 4
County Ftre Oeperl~ent County Health Deparl}nent
County Flood Control County Planntng Department
Building and Safety. Land Use and Gradtrig DIvisions
Ca 1 tra n s
The cmmon open space area she11 be shown as a numbered lot on the
ftnal map and shall be reneged by a master property o,ners'
association.
,
c. Ai propert~ o~ner's association vlth the unqualified rtght to assess
the owners of the Individual antes for reasonable maintenance costs
shall be established and continuously mtntalned. The association
shall have the rtght to 1ten the property of the armors who default tn
the payment of thetr assessments. Such 1ten shall not be subordinate
tO any encumbrance other than a first deed of trust provtded such deed
of trust ls made tn good fatth and for value and ts of record prtor to
the 1ten of the association.
d, PFtoF to FeeeFdatten of eke fanS3 nets eke lubdtv4dlw lka~3 ionMay to
the Geenly lee a4mpie tat;e. to a;~ leeaon of seen open Itsel apses.
Weeand e;eaF e; a;; ;aenh eaaeh e.eeaeanlv ;eases 4Feeewdel end
umFeeeFded~ end easeeaRth emeett eke. easements ~kaek 4n the te;e.
diesFelleR et the Geeely ape --settab;e, M eeed414ens treeslent"
the Geesty Illett4R! titel te seek aPses, the IMkdtv4dlF aka~ asbs,~
dosemonte sma;~ be subdeer to eke app.va;
Office et eke Geen~y
i~ A dII;IFIt4eR e~r seveRentis lendtt4ena end FlatF4lt4ena4 and
desieFol4en of flaysseth sead4t4ena end FeetF4et4eas submatted ~eF
eee4ev eliale 41~ pev4de ;ee I teen 01 iey llpl~ ~b~ pev4de te~ the
eelab;4lleente; · ewty IllRiPS~
Nab 4nd4v4duerm~e4 ew east oleeetat4en enql;F40H el eke weeps
pFev404ens vewbse4e+ (Deleted ~ Planntng Coemrlss~on 8-16-89)
elleeh~4tkelaed4e any teevle4en 4n shte gee;aFat4ee 4e eke
She ;~lee4nl IHmv4e4en obe;1 apt;pc (0elated by Planntng
Commission 8-X6-89)
The pepeF4~ wneFs~ aaeeetaf4en eelab;40hed klWl4R eka;3~ 4;
dermant~ be Ilt4vlteds ~4nIoPpoFIe4oR~-~ etke~tles 0t eke
TENTATZVE TRACT NO. 22762, Htnor Change No. 1
Page 5
R4vep~4de, upon the geun(yzl demands title te aSS ow any ~aw(
h
peepawry wne~lz lliee4st4ea end the deeil4en te f~quiFe the
lllelIll4en ~lend~tIlne;;y lieeFt t44~1 M the 4linen 1w004 0k0~
be II UIIO;I dilipl140n 0~ ~e G~n~ l; R4veFs4de, (Deleted by
Planntng ~tsslon ~89)
tO the II~epew(y lwlqews4 000eeIit40h the 000oe40440h thewee~tew
osses4it4on 0k0;; have the F4Skt M 006060 4k0 wReFs 0~ lash
~,0~. e.e,~. lad eka~; have the eight to q40n the p,epe,~y 0~ any
seek ~neF ~ de~ee;~s 4n the pa~eR4 0~ t m4ntetenie assessment,
aFoottag the assailant ~40n, (Dele~d by Planntng Co~sston
8-~6-8g)
llublllnl4l;i 4~ 44 l~elte the uneasy usage IF m4nlena.e 0; the
Aee~ aeo~ (~let~ by Planntng ~sston ~Z~89)
een~e;va (hl0~ by Plannlng C~ss~on ~X~89)
ke alNH, wodv 4bo dedlwit40n ef levemnamill eomd4(40ns and
feetF4lt4Onl skal; be eeel~ded it ~Oue sine t4me that &he ;~ns~ mp 40
elsefind, ableted by Planning ClanlEsion 8-~6-89)
Prtor to recordallen of the ftnal subdivision rap, the subdivider
shall sulmtt the felllying documents to the Pllnntng Departneat for
really, ~htch documents shall be sub~lect to the approve1 Of tha~
departneat and the Office of the CountJr Counsel: (Added by Pllnntng
Ccmrisston 8-26-89)
1) A declarattG~ of covenants.~.condtttons and restrictions; and
TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 2276%, Htnor Change No. %
Page 6
2)
A sample document conveying tt tle to the purchaser of an
individual let or unit which provides that the declaration of
CovenantS, Conditions and restrictions ts incorporated therein by
reference.
The declaration of covehints, conditions and restrictions submitted for
revtew shall (I) provtde for a mtntmum tam of 60 years, (b) provide
for the establisl~nent of a roperay owners* association comprised of the
owners of each Individual V (c) provide for ownership of the
Ot Or unt t,
CommOn Irea by either the property owners' assoctltlon or the ovners of
each Individual lot or untt as tenants tn coneon and (d) contain the
following provisions verbatim: (Added by Planntngg Conmntsston 8-16-89)
"'Notwithstanding any provision tn thts Declaration to the contrary,
the following provision shall apply: (Added by Planning Commission
8-Z6-89)
The property owners' association established herein shall manage and
continuously maintain the 'cOmmon area '
, more particularly described
on Exhtbit _*._~__, attached here,o, and shall not sell or transfer the
'Common area , or any part thereof, absent the prior written consent
of the Planning Director of the County of RIverside or the County'_.s ·
successor-in-interest. (Added by Planning Commission 8-16-89)
The property owners' association shall have the right to assess the
oWners of each Individual lot or unit for the reasonable cost of
t
me ntatntng the 'common area' and shall have the right to lien the
property of any such owner who defaults in the payment of a
mintenance assessment. An assessment 1ten, once created, shall be
prior to lll other 1tens recorded subsequent to the nottee of
assessment or other document creating the assessment 1ten. (Added by
Planntng Cme. tsston 8-16-89)
Thts Declaration shall not be terminated, 'substantially' mended or
property aleannexed therefrom absent the prior' written consent of the
Planntng Dtrector of the County of Riverside or the County's
' '"'°'" '""'"' '""' "'°"'""'
tf It affects the extent, usage or maintenance of the
'Common Irea'o {Added by Planning Commission 8-16-89)
Zn the. event of any confltct between this Declaration and the Arttcles
of Zncorporatton, the Bylaws or the property owners' Issoctatton Rules
and Regulations, tf any, thts Declarstton shall control," (Added by
Planning Camtsston 8-15-89)
Once lpproved, the declaration of-covenants, conditions end restrictions
shall 'be recorded It the same ttme that the ftnal map t~ recorded. (Added
by Planntng Cm~tsston 8-16-89) ~-
TENTATZVE TRACT NO. 22761, Hlnor Change No. 1
Page 7 '
ee
The developer shall comply with the following parkway landscaping
conditions:
Prtor to the tssuance of INtldtn permtts, the developer shall
secure approval of proposed landscaping and trri eaton plans from
the County Road and Planntng i)epar~ent. A~I landscaping and
Irrigation plans and specifications shall be prepared tn a
reproducible format suttable for permanent f111ng with the County
Road Department,
2)
The developer shall post a landscape performance bond which shall
be released concurrently wtth the release of subdivision
performance bonds, uaranteetn the vtabiltty of all landscaping
which wtll be Installed prior ~o the assumption of the maintenance
responsibility by the district.
3)
The developer, the developer's successors-in-interest or
assignees, shall be responsible for all parkway landscaping
maintenance until such time as maintenance is taken over by the
district.
The developer shall be responsible for mtntenance and upkeep of all
those operations ire the 11tles of other parttes as apFroved
by the Planntng DIrector.
Street 11ghts shall be provtded vrlthtn the subdivision In accordance
wlth the standards of Ordinance 461 and the following:
l)
Concurrently vlth the ftllng of subdivision Improvement plans wtth
the Road Departant, the developer shall secure approval of the
proposed street 11ght layout first from the Road Department's
traffic engtneer end then from the appropriate uttllty purveyor.
2) Following approval of the stret 11ghttn layout by the Road
f the deveIIoper shall also ftle an
Ikpartant's tref tc engineer,
application ~lth LAFCO for the fom, tton of , street 11ghttng
district, or anneutton to an extsttng 11ghttng district, unless
the sttats ~thtn in extsttng 11ghttng dtsU'tct.
3)
Prtor to recordalton of the ftnal mp, the developer shall secure
condtttoal liproyal of the street 11ghttng application from
LAFCO, unless the stte is vtthtn an extsttng 11ghttn9 district.
su~tt~ ~ tM ~par~nt of Butldtng and
. nd
fop pl,n check ,p~o';,1 , s~11 c~ly ~th the
RiverSide County Planning Department
Page Two
October S, 1987
This certlftc&tion shall be signed by s responsible
Official of the valor company, 11)t_B~BDl,lHl~-bt
tubiJ &td_ g_ bt_GF a& ,la zxer s-gt st- g_tt t -
~ie ~partlent has a statement trn thornthe
VaLor District agreeing to serve domestic valor
every lot in the IgbdiviliOn On domed providing
satisfactory financial arrangements are completed with the
e~diVider, It will be necessary for the
arrugements to.be made prior to the recordsLion of the
f~nal nap.
~is ~p&rtment has & statement from the beterA M~icipal
VaLor:Distract agreeing teallow the oRbdivision ,wraps
eyetea to be e~r, ected to the severs or the D, gtrict.
sever lystem shall be installed according to
specifications as approyed by the D~etrtct. the CoyLy
Surveyor.~d the Health bpsrtmeat. Parapet prints oF the
plan,~ of the sever OySteR shall be submitted in triplicate.
along with the originaldrawing. to the CoyLy Surveyor.
primal shall ehw the internal pipe dinetar, location
to ~e ~teting ,yaLe. A single plat indicating location
or e~er lt~ee ~ water lines shall be , porti~ or the
sewage pl~e ~d profiles. ~e pl~e shall be signed by a
regiegerd elinear ud the ever district with the
tollW~g eertitSestS~: el eartifF ~at the deet; st the
8wer ~8tn ~ Tract Map ~761 is in accord~ce with the
amp lyeart ~81~ pl~8 of the hste~ bictpal VaLor
District ~ ~t ~e vista disposal eye art i8 adensaw at
~ie tile to treat ~e ~tietpated notes trn the proposed
tract. o
It wt~ll be mecesss~ for the fin~cia~ irr~gelente to be
ado prior to ~e fecordati~ of the final
ICDINrn4 L, BI:~VARDI
RIverside County
Planntng hpartaent
County Adm ntstrlttvl
RIverside, California
WATER ~NSERVATION DI~I~ j~ .
-I
have revteved this case and have the follmetng camMats:
Except for nuisance nature local run~ff which ma~ traverse portions
of the
property the project ts considered free from ordinary sto~a flood hazard.
However, a stoma of unusual magnitude could cause some damage. New construc-
tion should comply vtth all applicable ordinances.
The .topography of the area constats of yell defined ridges and natural water-
courses vhtch traverse the property, There ts adequate area outstde of the
natural watercourses for butldtng sties. The natural intercourses should be
kept free of buildings and obstructions tn order to maintain the natura'l
f h area and to prevent flood damage to new but d rigs.
dratnage patterns o t 0 14
A n~te should be placed on an environmental constraint sheet stating, "All new
but'dtngs shall be floodproofed by elevating the finished floors a minimum of
t
18 ' aches above adjacent ireand surface. Eros on protection shall be provtded
for!mobile home supports,
Thts project ts tn the
drainage plan fees shall be paid
regulations,
accordance with the
Area
applicable r~les and
The proposed zontng ts consistent ~tth existtrig flood hazards. Sm flood
fully dove op
control facilities or fiendproofing m~y be required to I to the
.taelled denstry.
TheDtst~ct'a report dated
ts still current for this project.
The Dtstrtct does net eject to the proposed ether change.
Thts project ts a pa~t of . The project v411 be
~ Imzard t
free of ordtnar), stem ood when improvements have been construc ed tn
accOrdance ~dth appreved pleas,
The 'attached ants apply,
r
hie C1vtl Engtneer
FIKE DEPARTMENT
IN C:::I:30~RA. TION WTT1,4 THE
~dAUFORNIA DEPAIqTM Ek'r OIt FORESTRY
S.-ll-89
· LMNZNG ~~
· PE;ZFZC leAN
Plmmltll &, inFnecrinl Offic
CII4) 717,6606
With respect to the ~onditiona of approve]. for the above referenced land division.
the Fire Department re,amends the foliosLug fire p~tection measles be ptov~de~
in ~,r~ce vt~ R~v~s~de ~ty ~d~ces ~d/or recognized fire pro~ec~on
/"ZRZ
Schedule ok" fire protection approved standard fire hydrants (6"x4"xlJ"), located
one at each street intersection and spaced no mote than 330 feet &part in any
direction, with no portionof any lot frontage more than 16S feet from a hydrant.
Minim~n fin flow shall be lO00 GPM for 2 hours duration at 20 PSZ. ·
Applicant/developer sh~ll furnish one copy of the water systmnplans to the Fire
DeparU~nt for review. Plane shall conform to fire hydrant tTpes, location and
spacing, Md, tat ,eta shall met tht fire floe requiresouts. Plane shall be
aigned/approvod by a registered civil engineer and the local valet company with
the foliosing certificat~onz °X certify that the design of the water system is
in accordance with the regaLfemurs presc~ibed by the R~verside County Fire
The roq~Lred water system, including fire hydrants, shall be installed and
accepted by the appropriate valet agency prior to any combust~be building
tutorial being p3J~ed on ea/ndividul ~ot.
Prior to~ the ~.i_u~dation of the finil sap, the developer shall deposit with the
liverside County Fire DeJextaent a mh sum of MOO.N) per lot/unit 'as mitiga~on
for fin protection tueewu. Should tie deweZWet choose to defer the tiae of
~nt, bs/sbo may enter into · ~ritten '~b-'t ant with the County deferring
said ~sent to the tim of lsmanc~ of · bed,Xd.Lng potRit.
~ quoRion8 regarding the messing of the conditions shall be referred 't~
· Lte ~taent PlanntaJ and leefeasting staff.
Nay 17~ 1989
c:D ePaaemeaf. o6 q uiEd ,g mad ,.9,a6ee j
Administrative Center · 17"/7 Atlanta Avenue
Riverside, CA 92507
Rtve,rstde aJ~.,P.1Ja~ J~p&r. tment
Atte:ntton: ellcii Irit~lald
Courtely AdmWn~'strlttve Center
4080 Lemon Street
RIverside, CA 92501
MAY 18
mVEmaNCOUNTy
PLANN;NO IXe'Mq~aENT
RE: Tract 22761 - Htnor Change #1
Ladt. es and Gentlemen:
The Land Use Dtvts4on of the Department of Building and Safety
has the following comments and conditions:
Prior to the tssuance of building permits, the developer shall
obtain Planning Department approval for all on-site and off-
stte stgnage idvertts4ng the sale of the subdivision pursuant
to Section 19.6 of Ordinance 348,
FIreplaces Bay encroach 1' tnto requtred mintmum 5' side yard
setback.
Nechantcal equipment may not be located tn required minimum 5'
stde yard setback,
Stte located tne $pectal Studtea Zone -- G-leg.
Developer Agreement #3 fees due prtor to butldtng permit
1liMBnee.
Very truly yours, ,
·
~:)UNYY OF FI ! VERS Z DE
make the folloel~ · loMitlon of eeprova~
to tomme-else any 'grading macemaine 5l cubic
the o~e~ o~ that lrO~e~ty w~all O~tain m lraei~g
NEXT
y&rdt ·
perm~ t
the B~ildinV and Safety Department.
goeStraCt from the l~ildieg and Safety Department.
material is placid or moved, reunites a eradine pe-mit.
N~f ·
be OPtmined from the I. iZdine sea Safety Depmrtme-t.
Provide verification that the eulsttng grading ~,b
permitted and lOproyal to COnstruCt ads obtained from t~e
The BradSfig lootSofa has fie comet on this site,
free Clarity Bradleg Forms
Z d4JP . le,. .i PAVtkl }
hey. JIll
.,~ ~se refer to 'the fo:lowinV comnen~:s vhen ~tu]:n:L~:~,inc/I V~ad~n~
( 2--n ~o: plan review bF ~e Grading Se~on.
~1. Please refer ~o d~pamen= f~ 284-86, 284-120,284-21
~d ~46' for appl~le ~fo~=~on ~o ~nclude on yeu:
· eTacling pILns, . . . · - .~S..~
, . %n ,~:~e: 'r.o ~ssue ·. V'rm V P , : {ol ~ems
- w~~ be le~de~ '&~ l~he pILn rev~ g · . .
a, 'Obtain · plan zev:Lew p :m~ , "
, Provide 3 .~opLes 'of l~he Prelim :Z So:Lls
Repoz~. ·
Provide · ~op~ of the hy4roloV:Lc-h~raul~c
~Ld- Pra~[de clearuce Xe==ers from the following
depamenU- · Yd lanninV . ·
· · · Flood Con~l -
· . . lt.~ad Depar~men~
·. Prov:Lds · · se~ 'of paman=
X f, .' condl=~ons of appz~val on the epprovsd case,
Provide an erosion coaSTs1 plan, prepared by
· licensed landscape. i:r. hi~e~:, for plan
zsv~ew, perm~=, and ben lag,
lu~mi= S ~oples of r, he gTading p. lan for dis~:i~u=ion and
~mview, .. . ·
Refer to any specJ,~Ac plan rela=ed ~o this pro~e~, ·
This proper=7 As Xoca~ad ~ ~e hn~o ~lif~mia
P:=en=ial 8~sidence ~ea, )er Boa~ Resolu~ion 88-61,
addi=ional geo=e~ical ~fo~=ion As retired,
Q~se~e slope se~s~ f~m pe~ ereas end
pc: 8e~on 701= ~d f~~ 19-~ of ~e gnl~o~ luildl~
Cod as sodif:Led Iq' Ord,biince 4S7. -.
..~:. Ori:eway f'n. des sbalX be 3J1 o:g Xess, '
Ih s~,Tee= erie pad alarm=Lens, 'Xnsure ~ha= · X% gz~de
· . ~o S~,Toe=- '
· Cmi~-% can be-sain~ained froa back of pad
JTA~! OF Pat 1~ I. v, '~ :Allera4 dd~ NGLIi4 AOINCY
DEPARTMENT C,)F TRANSPORTATION
DeveZopment Revlev
01-lL~-~5-4.13
Your Reference:
Rancho HIghXand;
County iof ]~Lvors/de
Doa:Na· Bradria3.d:
22761 Z~ed 8ou~ves~erZy or halo ~iro~ia
bad ~ Ynez R~d, net o~ X-IS In ~o ~l~ro~la.
Please re~sr to t~s attached bvslopusnt Revisv Yoravh~ch
docuaerrCs Coltruns* requirestun for l~lo project. ConZornance
vl~h t~ese conditions is required for issuance of an Encroachhour
Zr any York is riocease vitJ~in l~be mute highvay righ~ or vay,
~l~s DAE~A~ I hm~ Offi~ prior ~ ~i~ work.
Zr addit/onaX inromtLon Jademind, p2oaoe r, all Mr. Thnas ;.
Iov~o at,. (7Z4) 383-4384.
TENTATZVE TRACT NO. 2276Zo Htnor Change No. Z
Page 8
toque'foments of Rtve~'stde County Ordinance No. 655 and the
Riverside County Comprehensive General Plan,
h, Prior to recordeaton of the final map, an Envtromentsl Constraints
Sheet (ECS) shall be prepared in conjunction with the final map to
delineate identified environments1 concerns and shall be permanently
ftled with the office of the County Surveyor. A copy of the EC$ shall
shall be forwarded with copies of the recorded final
map to the Planning i)epar~ent and the Deparl~ent of Building and
Safety,
t, The following note shall be placed on the Environmental Constraints
Sheet: "County Geologic Report No. 199 & G,R, 199 (update) wa~
prepared for this .property and is on file at the Riverside County
Planning Department, Specific item of concern in the report are as
follows: The following note shall be placed on the Environmental
Constraints sheet: "Structure for huran occupancy shall not be
al 1owed wt thin the 50 foot setback associated wtth the Wi ldor~.ar
Fa u 1 t."
A copy of the ftnal map and Environmental Constraints sheet shall be
submitted to the Planning Department Engineering Geologist for review
and appoval,
k. The following note shall be placed on the Environmental Constraints
Sheet: 'This property is located within thirty (30) miles of Nount
Paloar Observatory,'
1. PriOr to the recordeaton of the ftnal rap, the subdivider shall
provtde a final geologtc report for Planning Department approval. The
report shill be performed by a qualified geologist ustng standard
Scientific methodology, Any mtttgitlon measures proposed shall be
incorporated tntO the destgn of the ftnal amp and directed by the
Planntn DIrector, Thts report shell be noted on an Environmental
ConstraYnts Sheet, wherever necessary.
Prtor to recordtalon of the ftnal m , the subdivider shall prepare
m. end sulmtt a Mrtttan report to the ~lanntng DIrector of the County of
liverside demonstrating compliance wtth those conditions of ipproval
r nd El ttgetlon measures of thts map end Envt remmntml Assessment Nos.
~1943 and 31084 whtch must be satisfied prtor to recordeaton of the
final amp. The Plmnntng DIrector my requtre Inspection or other
monitoring to assure such compliance.
Prlor to the tssuance of GRADING PERNITS the lollwing conditions shall be
· : satisfied:
;~. -. ,... ~-
'-
TENTATZVE TRACT NO. 2276:3, Htnor Change No Z
Page 9 *' '
I)etafled ~mn open space:area landscapfng .and Irrigation plans shall
be submitted for Planntng Department approval for the phase of
dievelol~nt tn process. The plans shall be certified by a landscape
Itchtract, end $h811 prodde for the following: (Amended by Planning
Ciomm(sston 8-%6-89)
hrmnent autcmat(c trr(gat(on systens
landscaped Ireas requiring (rr(gat(on.
Commission 8-%6.8g)
shall be (nstalled on all
(Amended by Planning
Z. Landscape screen(ng vhere requtred shall be des(gned to be opaque
up to a mtn(mum he(ght of six (6) feet at maturity. (Amended by
Planntng Commtss(on 8-%6-8g)
3, All ut(l(ty serv(ce areas and enclosures shall be screened from
view wtth llndscaptng .and decorative bert(era or baffle
treabnents, as approved b the Planntng DIrector. Utilities shall
be placed underground. (j~r~nded by Plann(ng Commission
4. Parkways and landscaped butldtng setbacks shall be landscaped to
provide vtsual screen(ng or a transition tnto the prt~ use area
of the s(te. Landscape elements shall tnclude earth belong,
ground cover, shrubs and spat(men trees tn conjunction w~eJ~
meander(ng sidewalks, benches and other pedestr(an amentries ,he
appropr(ate as approved by the Plann(ng Department. (Amended by
Plann(ng Comm(sston 8-%6.89)
5. Landscap(ng plans shall Incorporate the use of specimen accent
trees It key vtsual focal (nts project. (Amended by
Planntng Colmission 8-16-89~° wtthtn the
6. bibere street trees cannot be planted vtthtn right-of-way of
tntertor streets end roJect
right-of-way, they shall be parkways due to tnsufftc(ent road
planted outs(de of the road
rtght-of-qwly. (knlnded by Planntng Conwlsston 8-16-8g)
7. Landscaping pTans shall Incorporate nat(ve and drought tolerant
plants Mare appropriate. (Amnded by Planntng Cemm(sston
8-16.~9) ' -
8. All extsttng spedmen trees and significant rock outcropp(ngs on
the. subject property shall be shown on the proJect's gradtrig plans
and shall note those to be moved, relocated and/or retained.
(Amended by Pllnntng Coenntsston 8-16-8g)
g. All trees shall be wlntmum double staked. Weaker and/or slo~
rokrlng trees shall be steel
~oesntsston 8-16-89) staked. (Amended by Planntng
TENTATTVE TRACT NO. 22751, Htnor Change No. 1
Page 10
a. Ail approved gradtn and butldtng plans shall reflect the utilization
of post and beam :~ or
oundattons the appropriate combination of split
level pads and post end beam foundations ~hen development Is proposed
on slopes of fifteen arcant teeter measured over a
8-Z 6-89 )
be
If the project .is to be phased, prior to the approval of gradtng
permtts, an overall conceptual gradtng plan shall be submitted to the
Planntng Dtrector for approval, The plan shall be used as a guideline
for subsequent detatled gradtrig plans for Individual phases of
development and shall tnclude the following: (Amended by Planning
Commission 8-Z6-89)
Techniques whtch wtll .be uttltzed to prevent eroston and
sedimenteaton durtn ~.~gafter the gradtng process. (Amended by
Planning Commission Z-2
2!) Approximate ttme frames for gradt ~ Identification of areas
whtch my be graded durtng the ~g probability ratn months of
January through ~arch. (Amended by Planntng Coffantsston 8-Z6-89)
3} Preliminary pad and roadway elevations.
Commission 8-26-89)
(Amended by Planning
4) Areas of temporary gradtng outstde of a particular phase,
(Amended by Planntng Commission 8-26-89)
c. Driveways shall be destgned so is not to exceed a ftfteen (25) percent
grade. (Amended by Planntng Comm(sston 8-26-89)
d. Gradtng plans shall conform to Board adopted Htllstde Development
Standards: All cut and/or ftll slopes, or Individual combinations
thereof, uhlch exceed ten feet tn verttcal hetght shall be modtfled by
an appropriate combination of espectel terracing (benchtng) plan,
tncreese slope ratto (t,e,, 3:Z), retaining walls. and/or slope
lanttng combtried with Irrigation, All driveways shall'not exceed a
tfteen percent grade. (keendad by Planning Co,:ntsston 8-26-89)
All cut slopes located adjacent to ungraded natural terratn and
'exceeding ten (lO) feet tn verttcal he(ght shall' be contour-graded
tncorporatlng the following gradtrig techniques: (Amended by Planntng
Ca:dsston 8-16-89)
The angle of the graded slope shill be gradually ad3usted to the
angle of ~ nature1 terratn.
TENTATZVE TRACT NO. 22761, Htnor Change No. 1
Page 11
z)
Angular foms shall be discouraged.
the natural rounded terratn.
The graded form shall reflect
3) The toes and tops of slopes shall be rounded with curves with
radii designed in proportion to the total height of the slopes
where drainage and stability permit such rounding.
4)
Where cut or fill slopes exceed 300 feet in horizontal length, the
horizontal contours of the slope shall be curved in a continuous,
undullttng fashion.
ge
Natural features such as water courses, specimen trees and significant
rock outcrops shall be protected in the siting of individual building
pads on ftnal grading plans. (Amended by Planntng Comesalon 8-16-E9)
Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the developer shall provide
evidence to the Director of Building and Safety that all adjacent
off-site manufactured slopes have recorded slope easements and that
slope maintenance responsibilities have been assigned as approved by
the Director of Butldtng and Safety. (Amended by Planntng Commission
8-16-89)
h. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, a qualified paleontologi~''''
shill be retained by the developer for consultation and comment on th~
proposed grading with respect to potential paleontological impacts.
ShOuld the paleontologist find the potential ts high for impact impact
to significant resources, I pro-grade meeting between the
paleontologist and the excavation and grading contractor shall be
arranged. When necessary, the paleontologist or representative shall
have the authority to temporarily divert, redtract or halt grading
activity to allow recovery of fossils. (Amended by Planning
Commission 8-16-89)
Prtor to the issuance of gradtrig permits, a dralnage study Indicating
on- and off-stte flow patterns and volumes, probable tmpacts, and
Ind Cmltrans. (Amended by Planntng
Cammission ~-16-8g)
All dwellings shall be located a Intntmum of ten feet from the top and
-., o, '" "'""'
~-16-8~)
k. Nmtural drainage courses shall be retatned tn their natural state
wherever 1 (Amended by Planning Ccxmtsston 8-16-89)
posstb e.
TENTATZVE TRACT NO. 22761, Hinor Change No. 1
Page 12
31
AI] brow ditches, terrace drains $nd other minor swa]es where required
shall beltned with natural erosion contro~ materials or concrete. as
,approved by the :Planning Dtrector and Butldtng and Safety. (Amended
by Planntng Cmantsston &-16-89)
Any import or export ofmatertals shall be tn accordance with County
'Ordinances No. 457 and No. 565 respectively. (Amended by Planning
Comtsston 8-16-89)
Prior to the issuance of grading permit, the subdivider shall prepare
and submit a ~rttten report to the Planning Director of the County of
Riverside demonstrating compliance with those conditions of approval
and mitigation measures of thts map and Environmental Assessment Nos.
3~943 and 31084 which must be satisfied prior to the issuance of a
grading penntt. The Plannlng Dlrector my requtre Inspection or other
monitoring to assure such compliance. (Amended by Planning tomlesion
8-16-89)
Prior to the issuance of BUZLDZNG PERIqZTS the following conditions shall
be satisfied:
a. No but]dtng permits shall be issued by the County of Riverside for any
residential lot/untt wtthtn the pro~ect boundar~ unttl the developer's
successor's-In-Interest provides evtdence of compliance with publlc
factllty financing masures. A cash sum of one-hundred dollars ($ZO0)
per lot/untt shall be deposited Nlth the RIverside County I)epart~ent
of lutldlng and Safer as mitigation for 11brary
(Amended b~ Planntng ~omm sston 8-26-8g) publlc development.
t
b. Prtor to the submittal of butldtng plans to the Department of Butldtn
and Safety an acoustical stud3t shall be performed by an acousttca~
engtneer to establish appropriate edit tlon measures that shall be
applled to Individual deelltng untts vtth~n the subdivision to reduce
ambtent tntertor notse levels to 45 CNEL and exterior notse levels to
65 CNEL. (MEnded by Planning Coewisstona-16-ag)
Prtor to the tssuance of latldtng pemlts, comNstte landscaping and
Irrigation plans shall be sulaltted for Planntng Departheel approval.
~plans shall address 811 areas end aspects the tract requiring
landscaping and Irrigation to be Installed Including, but not 11mtted
to, perkray p18nttn , street tms, slope planting, end Individual
front'yard landscaping. (MEnded by Planntng Coantsston 8-16-8g)
All dvellfngs to be constructed vtthtn thts subdfvtston shall be
destgned and constructed vtth fire retardant (Class A) roofs as
Ft n
epproved by the Coun~ re Ibrshel. (ME dad by Planntng Commission
a-z6-e9)
TENTATZVE TRACT NC. 22761, Htnor Change No. ]
Page 13
ROof-mounted mechanlcal equtl~ent shall not be permitted within the
subdivision, however solar equipment or any other energy saving
devtces shall be peat trod wtth Planntng Deparl~ent approval
(Amended by Planntng Commission 8-16.89) '
f. Butldtn separation between all buildings excluding fireplaces shall
not be ~less then en (10) feet. (Amended by Planntng Commission
8-16.89)
he
A1,1 street stale yard setbacks shall be a mtntmum of ten (10) feet.
(Amended by Planntng Coff. ntsston 8-16.89)
A1!1 front yards shall be provfded wtth landscaping and automatic
Irrigation. (Amended by Planntng Commission 8-Z6.89)
Prior to the tssuance of a butldtng permtt, the subdivider shall
prepare and submtt a ~ttten ~port to the Planntng Dtrector of the
County of RIverside dBonstrat~ng c~11ance wtth those conditions of
approval and mitigation misures of thts mp and Envtron~ntal
Assesant Nos. 32943 and 3~084 whtch rest be satisfied prtor to the
tsSuance of a ~tldtng pemtt. The Planntng Dtrector my requtre
Inspection or other ~nttortng ~ assure such c~11ance. (Amended by .
Planntng Cmtsston 8-Z6.ag) -
Detailed common open space area landscaping and Irrigation plans shall
be submitted for Planntng Department approval for the phase of
development tn process, The plans shall be certified by a landscape
architect, and shall provtde for the following: (Amended by Planning
Commission 8-16-89)
]. Permnent autemattc Irrigation systems shall be Installed on all
landscaped areas requiring Irrigation.
Landscape screening where requtred shall be destgned to be opaque
up to a mrlntmuE betght of six (6) feet at mturtty.
All uttllty servtce areas and enclosures shall be screened from
vtev ~lth lendscaptn end decorative barriers or baffle
trea~me tat es epproved gy the Planntng Director. Utilities shall
n
be plecnd underground.
Parbays end landscaped tmtldtng setlacks shall be landscaped to
provide vtsual screening or a transition tnto the prtmr~ use irea
of the stte. *Landscape eTemnts sh111 Include firth bemtng,
ground cover, shrubs end spectaln tries tn con3unctton vtth
meandering stdevalks, benches and other pedestrian amentiles vhere
appropriate Is lpproved by the Planntng Department.
TENTATZVE TRACT NO. 22761, Htnor Change No. 1
Page 14 "
4e
5. LandScaping plans shall incorporate the use of specimen accent
trees at key visual focal points within the project.
Where street trees cannot be pl anted
interior streets and project parkways due
right-of-way, they shall be planted
rt gh t-of-way.
wtthin right-of-way of
to insufficient road
outside of the road
7. Landscaping plans shall incorporate native and drought tolerant
plants where appropriate.
All exlsttng spectmen trees and significant rock outcroppings on
the subject property shall be shown on the proJect's grading plans
and shall note those to be removed, reiDcared and/or retained.
9. All trees shall be minimum double staked. Weaker and/or slow
growing trees shall be steel staked.
Prior to the issuance of OCCUPANCY PEI~MITS the following conditions shall
be satisfied:
as
All landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in accordance with
approved plans prior to the issuance of occupancy pemits. If
seasonal conditions do not permit planting, interim landscaping and
erosion control measures shall be utilized as approved by the Planning
Director and the Director of Building and Safety.
be
Notwithstanding the preceding conditions, wherever an acoustical study
required walls shall be determined by the a st study where
appl t cable.
c. Concrete sidewalks shall be constructed throughout the subdivision in
accordance with the standards of Ordinance 461.
d. :Street trees shill be planted throughout the subdivision in accordance
with the standards of Ordinance 460.
e$
Prtor to the 1,sumrice of an occupancy permtt, the subdivider shall
prepare and suixntt · wrttten report to the Plannlng Director of the
'County of Riverside demonstrating compli·nce with all mining
;conditions of approval and Mtlgatton measures of this map and
Envtromnental Assessment Nos. 33.943 and 32084. The Planning Director
my rewire inspection or other monitoring to assure such compliance.
FB:mp
August 14b 1989
BIIIAIII'MBNI'Ai, &,11'l'lll
COUNTy OF FIIVEIRBID
PLANNZNG DEPARTMENT
T0: Fel lct a Bradfield - Spectflc Plans
FRON: Steve A. Kupferman - Eng?neering Geolog?st
RE:: Tentat?ve Tract 22761
$1Ope Stability Report No. 14 (update)
The folioring reports have Men rev?ewed relattve to slope stability at the
subject stte:
Tentative Tract 22761, Rancho California, RIverside County, CA," by
Leighton and Associates, cited duly 19, 1989.
2. "Response to County of RIverside Review Letter," by Le?ghton and
Associates, cited August 9, 1989.
· 51 ope Stab? 1 tty Eva1 uat? on for the Proposed Res? dent1 al Dave1 opnent,
These reports citemined that:
e
The proposed ftll Slope adjacent to Ynez Road ~ill be stable agatnst
both deep-seated fitlure and surftctal In?lure.
The proposed ftll slope should be stable agatnst both the deep-seated
and the surftctal slopo fatlure under setsmtc conditions.
These reports recamended that:
1. The' recomencittons tncluded tn the General Earthark and Grad?ng
SPecifications (Appendix D) of the Leighton geotechntcel report ~ted
June 16, 1989, should be incorporated tnto clestgn and constructSon.
2. All cut slopes should he observed by an engineering geologist during
gridf fig.
3. Cut;and flll slolms should be provtded Mth el;pro rtate surface
drainage features and landscaped (Mth drought-t~ferant vegetation) as
· soon as' posstble after gradtrig to minimize the potential for eroston.
BenaS_ slmuld be prodded at the top of fill slopes, and brow Itches
should be constructed at the top of cut slopes. Lot drainage should be
d~rected such that surface runoff on the slope face ts ntntm?zed.
OFFICE OF lOAD COMM~i~VVER & COUKrY lUlVEYOR
dune D. 1989
P.O IDz ~01~
C/|4) ?174H4
Riverside County Planning emission
4080 Lemon Street
Riverside., CA 92501
Tract Nip 22761
Ntnor Change tl
Schedule A - Team SP
Ladies and Gentlemen=
With respect to the conditions of approval for the referenced tentative
land division mp, the Road Department recouuends thac the landdivider
provide the foliowin street improvement plans and/or road dedications in
accordance with Ordinance 460 and Riverside County Road Zmprovement
Standards (Ordinance 461), Zt is understood that the tentative
correctl~ ShOwS acceptable ~enterline profiles, all existing easements
traveled rays, and drainage ~ourses with appropriate O's, and thac
emilshort or unacceptabiZity may require the map to be resubmitted
further aonsideration. These Ordinances and the folioring conditions are
essential parts and a requirement occurring Ln ONE is as binding
though sicLifting in all. They are intended to be compZementary and tc
A
describe the condiUons for a complete design of the improvement.
questions. regarding the true meaning oZ the conditions shall be referrat
to the Road CommissLoner's Office.
the landdivider slull protect dovnstremnproperties from
damages caused alteration o~ the
shell be provided IP/sonstrutting adequate drainage
facilities i~ludi~ ulareing existin facilities and/
or ~ Mars a draluee easeant, ~1 drslMVe
~smnts m~l b m on taw fill up and noted as
foilwet eDraiMVe besmear - no buildin , obstructions,
Or encr~cmnts by hnd f~lls are all~e~", ~e
protectlM IMII M ~ a~r~ed b~ the Rud h~rtaent,
2. He landdivider shall accept and properly dispose oe
all offsite draluge flwing onto or through the site.
Zn the mat the lad Commissioner permits the use o~
· streets for drainage putpesos, the provisions or Article
XZ of Ordinanae ~o. 460 viII apply. theaid the
q~antities exceed the street capacity or the use o~
Streets be prohibited for drainage purposes, the
subdivider s~ll provide adequate drainage facilities
as approve by tbe RoadDepert~ent.
Fe~ 1eta 8r'adf~e~ d
August 15, 1989
The other portion of f~11 slopes should be etther overbuilt by 2 feet"'
(mtn(mm) and trtmmed back to the ftntshed slope or campacted tn
tncPenents of 5 feet (maximum) by a sheepsfoot roller as the ff1T ts
placed and then trackwalked to echteve the ftnal configuration.
These r~ports $ettsfy the General Plan PequtPenent for I slope stability
report. The Pecmendatton$ made tn these Pepores shIll be a~hered to tn the
clestgn and construction of th~s project.
$AK:al
Tract~ap 22761 o N4nor Change
dune D. 1989
Page 2
,
S,
So
g,
Ka~or drainage is involved on this landdivision and its
"resolution shall be as approved by the Road Department.
· Am and "Co targets shall be improved within the dedicated
right of way in accordance with County Standard No. 104,
Section A. (40'/60')
oD' Street shall be is;roved within the dedicated right oE
way in accordance with County Standard No. 105, Section A.
(36'/60')
Preece Lane end °Be Strut shall be improved with 34 her
of asphalt concrete pavement within a 45 foot part ei'dtA
dedicated right of way in accordance with County Standard
103, lection &, (22'/33')
Concrete sidewalks ehall be constructed throughout the
landdivision in accordance with County Standard No. 400 and
40% (curb sidewalks).
.Znez Road (northerly o{ Ranch, V~sta load) shall be
'=improved with toncrete curb and gutter located 38 feet from
centerline and match up asphalt concrete paving ~
reconetruction~ or rosatracing of existing paving as
!determined by the Road Commissioner within a S0 foot hale
:width dedicated right of way in I~ordance ei~h County
Itsnbrd ~, 101,
Ynes Road (southerlF of Ranch, Vista load) shall be
improved with concrete curb and gutter located 32 feet .from
mentorline and match up asphalt concrete paving:
reconstruction~ or femur:facing of existing paving as
determined by the Road Commissioner vAthAm a 44 foot half
widLh dad,uSed right of way in accordance viSA County
Itandard Ire. 102.
;A semenduty ·chess road to the ·eareat paved road
n I be constructed within the
maintained by the Cou ty ml~ l
bile fight of ~sy in scootdance with County Standard
~06e Section B, (32'/60') ·t · grade and alignment as
· roved by the Road Commissioner, ~his is necessary for
eFr~ulaticopurposes,
prior to the recordalien of the final map, the developer
shall deposit with the Riverside Count Road De rtsent, a
iossh Sue of lie0.00 · lot as sitegas,on ~ traffic
signal impacts. SboulFthe developer to defer the time of
payment, · written agreement may be entered into with the
Count defer·inS said payment to the ties of issuance of a
building parsit.
:
Tract mp ZZ/oJ. -mnor GMnge 11
j. ns 13, Xga9
P~ge 3
~undarAes at a grade and alA naent as approved by the
liverside County load CmmissYoner. Cospietism of
road laproveaent· does not i~ply acceptance for min-
tsmarco by County,
Electrical and ~oeeunioations trenches ·hall be provided in
accordance with Ordinance 461, Standard 117.
Aspbaltic eaulsion (fog seal) shall be applied not less
than fourteen days following placement of the asphalt
Surfacing and shall be'applied at a rate of 0~0S gallon per
square yard, Asphalt saul·ion ·hall conform to Section 37,
39 and
Standard cul-de-·ace ·hal% be constructed throughout the
landdivision.
Corner cuthicks in conformante with County Standard No. 805
shall be shown on the final nap and offered for dedication.
Lot access shall be restricted on Znez Road and so noted on
the final mp.
L'nddivl·lon· creating cut or ~ILL ·lopes adjacent to the ~
· :reef· ·hall provide ere·ion control, eight distance
c~ntrol and slope easements as approved by the Road
DeperUent.
landdivider shall provide utility clearance from Ranch,
.C~lifcrnia later District prior to the recordalien of tl~e
f;nal nap,
~e minisus ~ot frontages a~ong the
feet,
be 300 feet or as
knuckles 81~aLl be 35
All drivers · shall ~onforatotAe applicabLe Riverside
C0u t~ l~rde, n
· lte minimum garage eelhack shall be 30 feet mamared free
Ulefa~eofourb,
":l went,riles intersections shall be at DO* with a minimum
I~*dtanVent lieured free floe line or aa approved by the
BOa Cculllllioner,
Tract J:lap 22762 o Ntnor Change
J~,,ne Z3, Zg8g
Page 4
The street design and;improvement concept of this pro~ec~
Shall be coordinated with SP ~80, ~ 227oe, TR 22204, TR
21760 and Tit 22762.
Very truly yours,
County of Riverside
DATE: Hay 12. 1989
ATTN~,._~C Brad field
FROM: SAH ~IRDHKE~AL BL4~TR SPECZ.~I.3~ST FV
RE: ~RACTHAP 22761, Kr~Ol CRANGZ # I
May S, 1989 . Our ~urrent cements vial rm~u as stated
in our letter dated QL~t~M~'d,'tg87.
J~f:tac
dated
d
October g., 1087 ; -.... ~ .- ~.~
Riverside
4080 bran It, RI~SrDE~
Riverside,
US:; TRACT MAp
Lots l, l, · & 8.Block Z8 end a portion of Lots I & ZS Block
it of
II, Page 607 at Maps, Records at Isn Diego County
California.
(80
Oentlemen:
The Department at hbltc Health has reviewed Tentative HaP
~o,.'~?ll and racehonda that=
X water system shalX be installed according to
plm~s mJ~d Specific&lion &s approved by the water
conpLay and the Health Departrent. Permanent
prints of the plmAs oF the valor eyeten shall
be subsiLted in triplicate, vSth a minimum scale
not less LhsA one inch equals ~00 feet, a~ong v~h
the original dr&wing to the Calmly Surveyor. The
prints shell shay the internal pipe dinetar,
locatt~ of ~lves end tire hydrants! pipe end
Joint specifications, and the size at the main
&t the 3unction of the nov systa to the
existing oysteR, The plans shall comply in
t~l respects with Dtv, I, Part I, Chapter 7 of
the California Health and hasty Code, California
Administrative Code, Title Z~, C:hspter IS, and general
Order Me, 10l et the Public Utilities CatmaSon of the
be ellned bye registered engineer end uter caRpiny
vitJ~ t~be..follmfSng certification: "! certify khst the
doeS; of t~e uter mysteu in Tract Map 11761 is in
seemrdmJsce with tlamutmr eyetom expansion plans or the
Jignabs hiSgamin Vetmr Dimtrick and t, hst khm vetmr
mmrvSem, mtoragm mm~d dimtrib4ttSon mymtnwill be
sdmqustm ks providm~fstmr mmrviem to much tract,
Thim emrtitScstion domm not eonmtitutm s fuarentmm that
It will eupply vstmr to mush tract It lay specific
eta&aLiaSes, tiffs or pressures tar tire.protection or
lay o~her purpose'.
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
STAFF REPORT
FIRST EXTENSION OF TIME
S~STAFFRPT~2761-2.VTM 17
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
October 1, 1990
Case No.:
First Extension of Time
Tentative Tract Map No. 22761
Minor Change No. 1
Prepared By: Richard Ayala
Recommendation:
APPLICATION INFORMATION
Approval
APPLICANT:
Coleman Homes
REPRESENTATIVE:
PROPOSAL:
Robert Bein, William Frost F, Associates
Eighty ~80) lot residential subdivision of 28 acres.
First Extension of Time.
LOCAT ION:
Between Rancho California Road and Santiago Road.
west of Ynez Road.
EXISTING ZONING:
Specific Plan 180 {Rancho Highlands)
SURROUNIDING ZONING:
North: R-A-5
South: SP 180
East: R-1
West: I - 15
I ResidentialAgriculturaI,
acre minimum)
Rancho Highlands)
One-Family Dwellings)
Interstate 15 )
PROPOSED ZONING:
EXISTING LAND USE:
Not requested.
Vacant
SURROUNDING LAND USES:
North:
South:
East:
West:
Multi-Family Residential
Single Family Residential
SingJe Family Residential
Interstate 15
PROJECT STATISTICS:
Total Acreage:
No. of Lots:
Open Space Lots:
Proposed DU I Acre
Proposed Minimum Lot Size:
28
80
1
2.8
7,200 sq.ft.
· -- STAFFRPT\TM22761 1
ANALYSIS
BACKGROUND:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
GENERAL PLAN AND
SWAP CONSISTENCY:
Specific Plan No. 180, Rancho Highlands, w~
adopted by the Riverside County Board of
Supervisors on June 5. 1984. Amendment Ne. 1 to
this Specific Plan, Change of Zone No. 5105, and
Tract No. 22761 were adopted by the Board on July
18, 1988. The Amendment switched Planning Area
Nos. 8 and 9 (Tract No. 22761 ) from the very low
residential category of 0-2 DU/AC to the low
residential density category of 2-5 DU/AC.
Minor Change No. 1 to Tentative Tract No. 22761
was originally approved by the Riverside Board of
Supervisors on November 1~, 1989. The application
was submitted for the reconfiguration of streets and
adjoining .lot layouts to increase land use and
circulation efficiency.
Tract Map No. 22761, Minor Change No. I is a
proposal to subdivide approximately 28 acres into
eighty {80) single family residential lots with a
minimum lot size of 7,200 square feet. The subject
site is located south of Rancho California Road, west
of Ynez Road and easterly of 1-15.
Desiqn Considerations
The proposed subdivision has been designed
accordance with the standards of Ordinance Nos.
348, L~60 and Specific Plan No. 180. The main access
to the project is Preece Lane. The project has been
designed to provide increase land use and
circulation efficiency.
Density
The proposed subdivision (Tract No. 22761, Minor
Change No. 1) according to Specific Plan' 180,
requires proposed subdivisions to range from 2-5
DUIAC. The proposed subdivision consists of 2.8
DUIAC. Thus, meeting Specific Plan No. 180
density requirement for residential development.
The proposed density of 2.8 units per acre is
consistent with the Southwest Area Community Plan.
In addition, Staff finds it probable that this project
will be consistent with the new General Plan when it
is adopted.
STAFFR PT~TM22761 2
FINDINGS:
On July 18, 1988, the Riverside County Board of
Supervisors adopted a Negative Declaration for
Environmental Assessment Nos. 319~3 and 3108~ to
be applied to Tract Nos. 22761, 22762, and 21760,
Amended No. 2, at which time determined that the
Conditions of Approval for Tentative Tract No.
22761, Minor Change No. 1 will mitigate any
environemtnal concerns.
There is a reasonable probability that
Tentative Tract No. 22761, Minor Change
No. 1 will be consistent with the City~s future
General Plan, which will be completed within
a reasonable time in accordance with State
Law.
There is not a likely probability of
substantial detriment to or interference with
the future. and adopted General Plan, if the
proposed use or action is ultimately
inconsistent with the plan.
The proposed use or action complies with
State planning and zoning laws.
The site is suitable to accommodate the
proposed land use in terms of the circulation
patterns, access, and density.
The project as designed and conditioned will
not adversely affect the public health or
welfare.
Tentative Tract No. 22761, Minor Change
No. 1 is compatible with surrounding land
uses. The harmony in scale, bulk, height,
density, and coverage is likely to create a
compatible physical relationship with
adjoining properties.
The proposal will not have an adverse affect
on surrounding property, because it does not
represent a significant change to the present
or planned land use of the area.
The project as designed and conditioned will
not adversely affect the built or natural
environment as determined in the Initial
Study for this project.
~ STAFFRPT\TM22761 3
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
That said findings are supported by minutes,
maps, exhibits, and environmental documents~.,
associated with this application are hereir
incorporated by reference.
The Planning Department Staff recommends that the
Planning Commission:
APPROVE Tentative Tract Map No. 22761,
Minor Change No. 1, based on the analysis
and findings contained in the Staff Report
and subject to the attached Conditions of
Approval.
RA:ks
AttachmentS:
1, Conditions of Approval
STAFFRPT\TM22761 ~ _~
10 Sdr~ DoeOr~
Location Map
ATTACHMENT NO. 4
EXHIBITS
S\STAFFRPT~2181-2.VTM
18
CITY OF TEMECULA
10 Sdf~ D'®gr'
Location Map
CASE NO.V'T'I~ zz'/e,I
EXHIBIT NO. '
~P.C. DATE It'kt'~tl /)
CITY OF TEMECULA
SP. 180
CASE NO.VTI"I Z.Z,"~|
CITY OF TEMECULA
(.too)
j,,
;-: 'm
,C
/,
~p.C. DATEII~~-~I
~c,sE NO.~ZZ76~
EXHIBIT NO.
CITY OF TEMECULA
ATTACHMENT 7
FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT
CITY OF TEMECULA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT
TRACT MAP NO. 22761 DATE: June 17, 1992
IMPROVEMENTS
FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE
MATERIAL & LABOR
SECURITY SECURITY
Streets and Drainage $ ~76.500.00 $ 238,500.00
Water $ 197,000.00 $ 98,500.00
Sewer $ 183,000. O0 $ 91,500.00
TOTAL $ 856,500.00 $ 428,500.00
*Raintenance Retention (lOll fer one Jeer)
*(or Bonds tf eork is cmpleted)
$ 85,650.00
Monument Security
City Traffic Signing and Striping Costs
Fire Mitigation Fee
RCFC Drainage Fee Due
Signalization Mitigation Fee - SMD #9
Road and Bridge Benefit Fee
Other Developer Fees (Quimby)
$ 22,200.00
$ -0-
$ 32.000.00
$ -0-
$ 12,000.00
$ -0-
$ 93,600.00
Planning Department Fee
Comprehensive Transportation Plan Fee
Plan Check Fee
Inspection Fee
Monument Inspection Fee
181.00
8.00
2,370.00
28,186.25
1,111.00
Total Inspection/Plan Check Fees
Less Fees Paid To Date (Credit)
Total Inspection/Plan Check Fees Due
31,856.25
31,856.25
-0-
AGENDAS/ARO06
ITEM NO.
12
APPROVAL ~
CITY ATTORNEY '
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER ~"~
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Final Tract Map No. 22762
PREPARED BY:
Kris Winchak
R ECOMMEN DAT I ON:
That City Council APPROVE Final Tract Map No. 22762,
subject to the Conditions of Approval.
DISCUSSION:
Tentative Tract Map No. 22762 was originally approved by Riverside County in May
of 1988. The first extension of time was approved by the City of Temecula on
October 1, 1990 and the second extension of time was approved by the City of
Temecula Planning Commission on December 16, 1991.
Final Tract Map No. 22762 proposes to subdivide 16.9 acres into fifty (50) single
family residential lots and one | 1 ) open space lot. The subject site is located south
of Rancho California Road, west of Tierra Vista Road and easterly of 1-15. The
project is consistent with the approved Specific Plan No. 180.
The following fees have been paid (or deferred) for Final Tract Map No. 22762:
* Area Drainage Fees
* Fire Mitigation Fees
* Traffic Signal Mitigation
* Stephen's K-Rat Fees
$ 15,713.52
$ 20,000.00
$ 7,500.00
$ 32,877.00
The following bonds have been posted for Final Tract Map No. 22762:
Streets and Drainage
Water
Sewer
Survey Monuments
Signal Mitigation Fee
Faithful
Performance
$L155,000. O0
6LI, 500. O0
57,000.00
Other
Bonds
$16,170.00
$ 7,500. O0
Labor and
Materials
$227,500.00
32,500.00
29,000.00
SUMMARY:
Staff recommends that City Council APPROVE Final Tract Map No. 22762, subject to
the Conditions of Approval.
KW/TN: ks
Attachments:
1. Development Fee Checklist
2. Location Map
3. Copy of Map
Conditions of Approval
5. Fees and Securities Report
ATTACHMENT 1
DEVELOPMENT FEE CHECKLI.~T
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEVELOPMENT FEE CHECKLIST
Revised Vesting Final Tract Map No. 22762
The following fees were reviewed by Staff relative to their applicability to this
project.
Fee
Habitat Conservation Plan
(K-Rat)
Parks and Recreation
(quimby)
Public Facility
Condition of Approval
Condition No. 1 from the First
Extension of Time
Condition No. 9
Condition No. 7
Traffic Signal Mitigation
Fire Mitigation
Condition No. 3
See Fire Department Letter
Dated 10-6-87
Flood Control
(ADP)
Condition No. 5
Staff Findings:
Staff finds that the project will be consistant with the City~s General Plan once
adopted.
The project is part of Specific Plan No. 180.
ATTACHMENT 2
LOCATION MAP
CITY OF TEMECULA ~
I0 Sac D,ey
Location Map
YtctU ITY tv~AP
rc ASE NO.VI'H 2~ZTbZTM
EXHIBIT NO.
~e.c. DATE t~-4'~ll ~
ATTACHMENT 3
COPY OF MAP
;I--''~-
¢o~ /
~ E}x/'
&&
ATTACHMENT
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Tentative Tract Map No. 22762
Second Extension of Time
Department of Public Works
The following are the Department of Public Works Conditions of Approval for this project, and
shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All questions regarding the true
meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the appropriate staff person of the Department
of Public Works.
It is understood thai the Developer has correctly shown on the tentative map all existing
easements,. traveled ways, and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project
to be resubmitted for further review.
The Developer shall comply with all Conditions of Approval as previously imposed or amended
and with the Conditions noted below.
PRIOR TO RECORDATION OF THE FINAL MAP:
Prior to recordation of the final map, said agreement shall require construction and
completion of the recreation center and private park prior to the issuance of the
Certificate of Occupancy on the 250th unit in Specific Plan No. 180 or by July 1,
1993, whichever comes first; a bond in an amount set by the Public Works
Department shall be provided; prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy of
any unit in either tract, Ynez Road shall be improved with A/C paving.
Pursuant to Section 66493 of the Subdivision Map Act, any subdivision which is part
of an existing Assessment District must comply with the requirements of said section.
Prior to recordation of the final map, the developer shall deposit with the Department
of Public Works a cash sum as established, per lot, as mitigation towards traffic signal
impacts. Should the developer choose to defer the time of payment of traffic signal
mitigation fee, he may enter into a written agreement with the City deferring said
payment to the time of issuance of a building permit.
PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT:
A precise grading plan shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review
and approval. The building pad shall be certified by a registered Civil Engineer for
location and elevation, and the Soil Engineer shall issue a Final Soils Report addressing
compaction and site conditions.
A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the prevailing Area
Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new development. The charge is
payable to the Flood Control District prior to issuance of permits. If the full Area
$t'STAI~2762"2'TrlVl 14
Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already credited to this property, no new
charge needs to be paid.
Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code,
City Grading Standards and accepl~ed grading practices. The final grading plan shall
be in substantial conformance with the approved rough grading plan.
Developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities imposed
upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public facility mitigation as
required under the EIR/Negative Declaration for the project. The fee to be paid shall
be in the amount in effect at the time of payment of the fee. If an interim or final
public facility mitigation fee or district has not been finally established by the date on
which developer requests its building permits for the project or any phase thereof, the
developer shall execute the Agreement for payment of Public Facility fee, a copy of
which has been provided to developer. Concurrently, with executing this Agreement,
developer shall post security to secure payment of the Public Facility fee. The amount
of the security shall be $2.00 per square foot, not to exceed $10,000. Developer
understands that said Agreement may require the payment of fees in excess of those
now estimated (assuming benefit to the project in the amount of such fees). By
execution of this Agreement, developer will waive any right to protest the provisions
of this Condition, of this Agreement, the formation of any traffic impact fee district,
or the process, levy, or collection of any traffic mitigation or traffic impact fee for this
project; provided that developer is not waiving its right to protest the reasonableness
of any traffic impact fee, and the amount thereof.
Transportation Engineering
PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ANY ENCROACHMENT PERMITS:
A construction area traffic control plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer
and approved by the City Engineer for any street closure and detour or other disruption
to traffic circulation as required by the City Engineer.
Temecula Community Services District
10.
Prior to RECORDATION of the final map the applicant or his assignee shall pay the fair
market value of 0.65 acres of required parkland to comply with City Ordinance No.
460.93 (Quimby). The amount to be paid shall be determined by TCSD staff within
thirty (30) days prior to recordation of said 'map. A fifty percent (50%) private
· recreation credit as defined in City Ordinance No. 460.93 (Quimby), shall be applied
r towards the required parkland in lieu fee.
Exterior slopes bordering an arterial street may be dedicated to the TCSD for
maintenance following compliance to TCSD standards and completion of the
application process.
S~STAFr-~r~27e~-=.TT~a 15
CITY OF TEMECULA
ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Tentative Tract Map No. 22762
First Extension of Time
Commission Approval Date: October 1, 1990
Expiration Date: July 18, 1991
Planning Department
Unless previously paid, prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall
comply with the provisions of Ordinance No. 663 by paying the appropriate fee set
forth. in that ordinance. Should Ordinance No. 663 be superseded by the provisions
of a Habitat Conservation Plan prior to the payment of the fee required by Ordinance
No. 663, the applicant shall pay the fee required by the Habitat Conservation Plan as
implemented by County ordinance or resolution. (Amended per Planning Commission
October 1, 1990.)
The Subdivider shall submit to the Planning Director verification that Section 10.35 of
Ordinance No. 460 has been previously satisfied or an agreement with CSA 143 which
demonstrates to the satisfaction of the City that the land divider has provided for the
payment of parks and recreation fees in accordance with Section 10.35 of Ordinance
No. 460. The agreement shall be approved by the City Council prior to the recordation
of the final map. (Amended per Planning Commission October 1, 1990.)
No building permits shall be issued by the City for any residential lot/unit within the
project boundary until the developer's successor's-in-interest provides evidence of
compliance with public facility financing measures. A cash sum of one-hundred dollars
(~100) per lot/unit shall be deposited with the City as mitigation for public library
development.
Engineering Department
The following are the Engineering Department Conditions of Approval for this project, and
shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All questions regarding the true
meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the Engineering Department.
It is understood that the Developer correctly shows all existing easements, traveled ways, and
drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further
consideration.
The Developer shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act, and all
applicable City Ordinances and Resolutions.
S%STAFt:RFl'~.2782-2.TTM 16
5. The developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies:
Rancho California Water DistriCt;
Eastern Municipal Water District;
Riverside County FlOod Control district;
City of Temecula Fire Bureau;
Planning Department;
Engineering Department;
Riverside County Health Department; and
CATV Franchise.
Prior to final map, the subdivider shall notify the City's CATV Franchises of the Intent
to Develop. Conduit shall be installed to CATV Standards at time of street
improvements.
Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and an
encroachment permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office, in addition to
any other permits required.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT:
The subdivider shall submit four prints of a precise grading plan to the Engineering
Department. The plan shall comply with the Uniform Building Code, Chapter 70, and
as may be additionally provided for in these COnditions of Approval. The plan shall be..,
drawn on 24" x 36' mylar by a Registered Civil Engineer. (Amended per Plannint.
Commission October 1, 1990.)
PRIOR
9.
10.
11.
12.
TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY:
Construct full street improvements including but not limited to, curb and gutter, A.C.
pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway trees and street lights on all interior
public streets.
All street improvements shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
Pavement striping, marking, traffic and street name signing shall be installed per
requirements of the City Traffic Engineer.
Developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities imposed
upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public facility mitigation as
required under the EIR/Negative Declaration for the project, in the amount in effect at
the time of payment of the fee. If an interim or final public facility mitigation fee or
district has not been finally established by the date on which Developer requests its
building permits for the project or any phase thereof, the Developer shall execute the
Agreement for Payment of Public Facility Fee, a copy of which has been provided to
Developer. Developer understands that said Agreement may require the payment of
fees in excess of those now estimated (assuming benefit to the project in the amoun~--
of such fees) and specifically waives its right to protest such increase.
S~TAFFRP'~2762-2."~ 17
RTYERSID[ CC)UHTY ~AXHi HG DEPART~]~T
C~)~iD:~TZOHS OF APPRDVA~
TEKTATI~E: T;U~CT IK). 22762
DAT[: 5-25-88
EXPZI~S:
. g~ ~e ~ fails ~ ~tly notify ~e.
~. ~ ~n~t?ve suM~v~s?on shall c~
SuM?vlslon ~P ~t and ~ all ~ ~mnU of ~?~nce 460, ~h~ule
A, unless mallfled ~ ~e ~nd?t?ons
~unty of Rtve~tde ~a~ of
provided by ~Mnce 460.
Ordinance 460. "
~e' suMlv~der sM11 su~lt ~ ~ of a ~fls ~ ~ ~e Rtve~tde
5' ~unty ~e~r's ~flce and
Safety. ~e ~ s~11 a~nss ~e soils s~b~l~ty a,d geological
~t~o~ of ~e st~ ~e ~u~v~der shall sv~t on~ print of
by Ordinance 4~i~ . en
co.d~t~ of ~PP ·
Condlt~ons of J~p.r:oval
Tract No. 22762
Page Z
, bt3¶ned from t~he Depart=ent of ~u41d~ng and
Safety pr'io~ n
ft~1 rap- 'tm~ t~v~nt ~cmndit~ons
9. ~e ~bdSvtder. s~1t ~ ~d ~par~nt's *letUr dated 11-13-87
10. Lega~ :access as ~~d by ~d?nan~ ~6D.s~3~ *be p~v4ded f~ ~e tract
~p ~unda~ ~ a ~un~ m4n~ned ~ad.
M1 ,ad eas~en~ sha~l M offe~ for d~cat~on ~ ~e Wb~tc and shal~
~fe~ Road ~?ss~oner- Stmt has shll~ ~ subject ~ app~va~ of
ut41~t~es, etc., shall ~ sh~ on ~e fins3 mp ~f the~ a~ locs~e
12. w4th4n the lind d~v4s4on bounda~. M1 offers of ded(cat4on
conveyances shall be s~it~d and ~corded is d(ncted b~ the ~unty
::~:~:; s~erage d~s~s81 flc~l(t4es: shall ~ ~nsh11~ 4n accordance
~3. w4th ~e p~v4s4ons set ~o~ in ~e .~4ve~4de ~unty ~s~th Depsr~nt's
letter dated 1~5-87 s ~ of ~(ch 4s at~ched. '
10-7-87 a copy,
adopted flood co fac~ltt4es.
the const~uCs~to°~:r of
15. ~e suMlvtder shill c~ly ~ ~e f~ ~rov~nt ~c~ndst~ons
ou~l~ 4n ~e ~un~ FS~ ~rsha1'S letter ~ted 10-6-87 a copy
4s atUched-
~6, ~e subd~vSder shall c~3y ~th the ,~ndat~ons outlSned
~Itrans letter dated 10-20-87, a copy of ~tch ts at~ed,
' basing 4ecludtng ~ p~sed c~n open s~ce ires*
~4v~st~ P * tf a l~cable shall be subject to P~n4ng'~
PP
Depa '
Conditions of ApprOval
Tract I~o:. 22752
Page 3
vetdcolar
coffforu to the tatsrot and Imrpose of the subdivision approval.
Lots'created by this subdivision shall .comply with the foilrating:
access to all lots tn each phase, and shall substantially
a, A11 lots shall hag a edna stze of 7200 square feet net.
b, -M1 -lo~ length .b widti~...rattos shatl...be. tn. conformance with
3,8C of Ordinance 460.
Sectton
.c. Corner lots and ~hrough lots, .1¢ aw~, shall be provided-vtth
additional a ;ant to Sac,ton 3,88 of Ordinance 460 and so as
not to coan~re~n less net n f net area
area than the least. anout ·
non-corner and thrndgh lots. ...
· . d. Lots created by this subdivision '~hall be tn conformsace vt~h the
development standards of the S.P. zone.
e. Vhen lots are crossed by major puhllc utillty easeme'ht~, each
shall have a net usable area of not less than 3,600 square
exclgstve of the utility as·Bent.
f. in a weed-free
landscap~ng'ur
approved by the
Graded but undeveloped 1aM shall ha maintained
condition and Shall be either planted vtth interin
prnvtded with other' erosion con,..to1 me·sums as
DIrector of 8utldtng and Safety..;
The subdivider shall comply with the Rancho Mater Distrtct racemend·,ions
dated 10-6-87o a copy of uhtch ts attached,
Prior to RECDRDATXON of the final mp the folioring toad¶,tons shall be
satisfied:
a. Prior to the record·,ton of the ftnal map the applicant shall submit
urltten clearances to the Itlverstde County had and Survey Department
that all pertinent requirements outlined in the attached approval
letters from the following agencies have been met.
County FIre Department ' .County Health Department
County Flood Control County Planning Department"
b. Prior to the record·,ton of the final rap, Change of Zone Ko. 5105'
shall ha approved by the Board of Supervisors and shall be effective-
Lots created by this land division shall be in conformsace vtth the
develolzmnt standards of the zone ultimately applied to the property-
Condtt4ons of Approval
Tract No. 2Z75Z
Page 4
c. The camon open space area shall be shwn as a numbered lot on the
,trial mp end sha~l be ranaged by a master property o~e~s
assoc4atton* '
A easter ropetiT meets essoctat4o~n or el;roprtate publlc mtnte,ance
.~ctftc plan, for ~e ~ ;, space lots lsndscsp4ng and
hc~lStSes, st;trig en ~ g as defined ~ugh ~e
s~c~fic plan sad ~ndtt~ons
rt ovner's association vtthe enqua14f¶ed r!ght to assess
shall ~ estab14shed ~dl~~ ~e p~peFt of ~e ~e~s vho default ~n
c Yh ~en shall not ~ su~rd~nst~
of t~st ~s male ~n good fal~ end for value and ~s of ~cord prior ~
the lien of ~e association-
Prior b recoNa~on of ~e tiM1 subd(v~s~on rap, the app14cant shal~ '.
su~t ~ ~e Plsn, lng hparmnt ~e folloWrig documn~ for ~Y
apples1 e~ch shall d~nst~ ~ the satisfaction of the Depa~.--,%t
that the ~1 pro~ect ~11 ~ developed and m~nVtned 4n acco~ance
v4th the 4ritefit and N~se of ~e apples1.
1) The documnt to conve3r tttle
2) Covenants, codes and restrictions to be recorded
3) Hanagement and m4ntenance agreement to be entered into ~!th the - untt/lot o~ners of the project.
The approved documents shall be recorded at the same time that the '
sutxltvtston mp ts recorded. hid documents shall conta4n proy4stons
for wnershlp or the irrevocable!right to use the open space and
amentries by the owners of the proSect. The approved documents shill
also contain · provision which provides that the CC & R's my not be
terminated, or substantially Ended without the consent of the County
or '1Is sgccessor-tn-tnterest.
· I '
Conditions of &pp~oval
Tract No. 22762
Page 5
g. TIle developer shall conpl~ tdth the following park~a~ landscaping
~ndttt~s:
~e ~ssulnce of ~id~ng ~~, ~e developer shall
~e'~un~ hie ~ s;~f(~t(~ shill ~ prepared ~:n~
~ich v411 ~ ins~cvm~ y
ruponstb~l~t~ b~ ~e dtstr4ct-
3) ~e developer, ~e developer's successo~-4n-(nte~st
k m~ns4ble for s31 pt~ lendscap4ng
us~gnees, Sha~ ,~ t~ue u m4nttance ts Uken over b~ the
m4nmunce ant
dtstricl;*
h. The developer shall be responsible for maintenance lad upkeep
slopes, landscaped ar~as and 4rq-igation s~stems until such time as
those operations are the responsibilities of other parties as-approved
b~' the Planntng ~rector. ' .
¶. Street lights shall he provided viabin the suhd¶vis~on tn accordance
~ith the standards of Ordinance 46~ and the folloWrig:
l) Concurre~tlY vith the f¶11ng of subdivision improvement plans v~th
-the bad Department, the developer shall secure approval of the
proposed stret 11ght lalmu~ first from the bad Department's
traffic engineer and then from the appropriate uttltt,Y purve~or-
aPPltcat(°no~t~annl~mtion to an existing l¶ghting dtstr(ct, unless
3} PHoP te recordeaton of the final map, the developer shall secure
conditional approval of the street 11ghfing application from
LAFCO, unless the site ts vithtn in existtrig lighttrig dtstrtct-
:~. Prior to recordat(on of the {tnal rap, an tnv(ronmental Constraints
Sheet (EC$) shall be prepared tn con:Junct(on WIth the At(hal map to
delineat. e Identified environmental concerns and shall be permanentl;Y
Condtt ons' of Approval
Tract ~Io, 227EZ
ftled ~th the o~ftce of the County Surveyor. A copy of ~he E~ she'1
k ~ln~t~d ~ ~e Plnntng bpa~t for ~t~ and epp~va'.
~e a,~ved E~ ~11 ~ roMPed ~ ~ptes of the ~co~ed
mp ~ ~e Planntng ~par~t and ~e ~r~nt of htldtng a d
kfet~.
k, ~e fo11~ng ~o~ s~11 k placed on ~e ~menUl Constraints
~eet: '~n~ bologtc ~rt No. ~g & E.R. No. Z99 (u~ate) ~s
t
pre~ for ~!s p~~ a~ ts on f le at ~e Rtve~tde
Pla~tng
1, The follwtng note*she11 be plsced on the Envtronment~l Constrstn-~
; Sheet: 'Thts property ls located wtthtn thlrty (30) miles of Hou~t
: Pelomr0bservatoTTo All proposed outjoor 11'ghttng system shi'l
! comply vtth the California I~stttute of Technolo~Zy. Palomar
! Observatory reconnendattons da~ed 10-6-87 · copy of vhtch ts attachel.
· . Prtor to the tssuance of gradtog permtts detailed comon open space
area landscaping and Irrigation plans shall be su!~ttted for Plannt~g
Deparl:nent approval for the phase of develofnent tn proces. The
~ plans shall be certified by · landscape architect, and shall p, ~vtde
for the fol 1 o~t ng.
1. Permanent automatic (rr(gatton systems shall be Installed on
landscaped ·res requ(r4ng Irrigation.
2. Landscape screen(rig vhere roqutred shall be destgned to be opaque
up to · Motmum hetght of stx (6) feet at maturity.
/11 ut111ty serfIce areas and enclosures shall be screened f
vtev vlth landscaping and decorative barrters or bsf~e
treatments, es upproved by the Planntng Dtroctor. Utilities shall
be placed underground.
4, Par~aJrs and landscaped Iafldtng setbacks shall be landscaped ~ to
profide rlsual screening · · trensltton 1·to the prJmry use a-as
of the else, Landscape :;merits shall tnclude earth beta1 ~g,
ground cover, shrubs and $pectlMn trees tn conJunc~;ton vth
meanderJog sldNlkse benches sod other pedestrian anentties vhlere
appropr4ate as ·pproved by the PlannSng Department,
5. Landscaplng plans shdl Incorporate the use of spectmen accent
trees st key vtsual focal po4nt. s vtthtn the project.
Conditions of Approval
Trac~ No. 2276~
Page 7
a6. I~ere street trees cannot be planted vtf. htn fight~of-way of
lnter4or streets and reject pllttvl~s due to tnsuff ctent. road
a r4ght-of-qeY, they shuT1 be planted outside of the
·
7. LaMscapteg plans shall ~ncerlmrate native and drought tolerant
pleats vhere appropriate-
S. A~l ' 4'sit" cinch trees and significant rock outcroPpings on
ex ng spa shall be shove on the pro_3ect's grading. plans
the rtY
g. All tms shall be erlnbaa double staked- .Meaker and/o~' slo~
gro~4~9 trees shall be steel staked.
Prior to the issuance of grading porm4ts, 8 drainage study thd4csf. tng
b.Y County Flood C~nt. rel Dtst~ct end Csltrans.
&11 appreved grading and tmqldtng plans shall reflect the ut¶ltzatton
c. of post and beam foundations or the ipprepr(ate combination of split
level pads and post and beam foundattons vhen development. ts proposed
of fifteen percent or greater measured over a hor4zontal
Z f the proJect'is'to'be phased, ~prtor ~o ~e approval of
d. peatie, an overall concepteel g~adtn plan shall be subn4tted to the
planntng D?rector for appreval. The ~an shall be used as a gu4de~tne
for subsequent deistled gradtag plans for tnd~v4dual phases of
developneat and shall tnclude the following:
i:. Techniques vhtch vtll be uttltzed to prevent eroston and
sediment/lion dartrig ud after the grading process.
2) Approx?mate tim frames for grading and 4denttftcatton of a~ess
wihlch my be graded dartrig the higher probability rate months of
aanua~J through Parch .
3). preliminary pad end roadway elevations
4) Areas of tempora~J gradtag outside of · particular phase
e. Drtveays shall be destgned so is not to exceed a fifteen iTS) percent
grade.
Conditions of Approval
Tract No. 22762
Page 8
g,
Grading plus shall confore to! hard adopted Hill·tale Developmer.t
Standards: at1 cast- end/re' tvtll slopes, or Individual combtnattors
an ilppropr~lte ~ate~,t · spec4al terrac4ng (be thing) pla~.,
n
Increase slope retto (~,e,, 3:1), retaining kmllS, end/or slope
gaMon. M1 drheva~s shall not exceed a
planttrig combined with trrl
d
fifteen percent gra e.
cut ·1elm loutad adjacent to ungraded natural leTrate and
exceeding ton (10) feet tn Verttcal hetght shall be-contour-graded
ln. corporattng the folloutng grading tochntques:
1) The angle of the graded sloe shall be gradually ad3usted to tke
angle of the natural tarralPh.
2) Angular forms shall be discouraged. The graded form shall reflect
the natural rounded totrain.
3)
The toes and tops of slopes: shall be rounded with curves wtth.
radTI destgned tn proportion to the total height of the slopes (.
~here dratnage and stabtllt~ pemlt such rounding. --
4) libere cut or flll slopes exceed 300 feet tn horizonta3 length, the
horizontal contours of the slope shall be curved tna continuous,
undullMng fashion..
h. Natural features such as water courses, spec4men trees and s4gntftc~nt
rock outcrops shall be protected tn the ·1tang of tndhtdual tat3dtng
pads on final grading plans,
Prtor to the tssuance of grading pereta·, the developer 'shall provide
evidence to the I)trector of 'Building and Safety that all adjacent
off-stag manufactured slopes have recorded slope easEfleets and that
slope mintchance responstbtlt'ttes have been Isstgned ms approved by
the DIrector of Building and Safety,
Je
Prior to the tssuance of grading pernTis, i qualified p&leontolog!st
shall be retained by the developer for consultation and confleet on the
ropOsed gradtrig with respect to potential paleontologtcal "trapacts.
lhould the paleontolog4st find the potential ts htgh for 4rapact Impact
to significant resources, · pro-grade meettrig between the
paleontologist and the ecaVat4on and gradtrig contractor shall be
arranged. Ilhen necessarj~ the.paleontologist or representat4ve shall
have the luthorttJr to *tenpOrartly dtvertt red4rect or halt grading
scatvary to a11o~ recover~ of fossils.
Conditions-of A;lproval
Tract No. 22762
Page 9
All eraell¶rigs shall be located · arintmum of ten feet from the toes nd
tops of all slopes over tee feet tn vertical height unles others·
· pp~oved by the Plinntng DIrector.
Katural dratnage courses'shill be retained tn thetr natural state
~herever possible.
m, -All bro~ dttches, terrace dratns sad other atnor svales 'vhere reqvt!red
shell be loned vtth natural eroston control raterills or concrete, 'as
approved by the Planntng. Directer and Bufldtng and Safety.
~. Any Import or exWrt of mr·rills shall be tn accordance v4th County
Ordinances IIo. 457 ud No. 565 respectively.
22. Prtor to the issuance of BUXLDTHG PERHZTS the following conditions shall
be satisfied: '
llo ialldJng permits shill be 1·sued by the County of RIverside for any
residential lot/anti vlthtn the project boundary unttl the developer's
successor's-In-Interest prorides evidence of compliance vith pub14c
1
f·c(lft.v financing me·suP·s. A c·sh sum of one-hundred do lars ($'-00)
per lot/untt shall be deposited v4th the Riverside County Depart·ant
of kfidtng and Safety as ElttgittOn for public library development.
Prior to the submittal of huTldtng plans to the Deparl~ent of gu41dtng
and Safety In acoustical sl~dy shall be performed by an acoustical
engtneer to eetlbltsh appropriate mitigation measures that shall be
· pplted to tndhtdu·l dvelltng untts vtthtn the subdhtston to ~educe
amb4ent Intertot nots· levels to 45 CNEL and exteFtor no(se levels tc
65 I:NEL.
c. Prior to the tssuince of botldtng pemtts, composite landscaping; ant
irrigation plans shall be sutxnttted for Planetrig Department approval.
The plAnS Shall address ·11 areas and aspects the tract reqgt*
landscaping and Irrigation to be installed tncluc!tng, but not lim~tec
to, ps~3r planting, street trees, slope planting, and tndtvtdua~
front Jrard landsc·ptng.
Ali d~ellfags to be constructed' vtthfn this subdh?sion shall b,
designed and constructed v4th fire retard·el (C~ass A)roofs a:
approved by the County Ftre Ikrshal. -.
e. Roof-mounted mechanical equipment shall not be permitted vtth?n th~
subdivision, hwever sol·r equtFeent or any other energy sa~tm
devices shill be permitted vtth Planntng Department approval. '
Trac~ No. 22752
Page :ZO
f. ~U~ldtng separetton beteen all buildings Including fireplaces' shal~
ne~ be less true tea (lO) feet.
g. All street side )l. rd Setbacks shall:be · elntmue ef ten (ZO) feet.
'h. All front yards shall 'be provided .Tab landscaping and automatic
Irrigation.
Frtortathe.tssuanceof.OCCUPNiCYFERHX-TSthefollmring conditions shall
be satisfied:
a. A11' landscaping and Irrigation shall be' test·lied'In accordance vlth
approved plans lrtor' to' the tssuan~e of occupancy permits. Zf
seasonal conditions do not permttplanttng, tntertm landscaping and
eroston control nee·urea shall be ttiltzed as approved by the Planetrig
Director and the Director of Building.and Safety.
b. Not ~tbstandlng the preceding !condittonso vherever an acoustical
study ts required for notse attenuation purposes, ~he heights of
requtred yells shall be determined by the acoustical s~udyvhere
applicable.
c. COncTe~e sidetalks shall be constructed throughout the subdivision ~n
accordance vlth the standards of Ordinance 46L
d. Street trees shall be planted throughout the subdivision in accordance
trlth tlie standards. of Ordinance 460. -. ..
taro), D. Smo~
etve'rsSde Caun~ Plasmt.ng Com4Ssl~
4080 Lemon Street
Riveraloha, :A S2SO~
OFFICE OF ROAD CONNI$$1ONER & COUNTY SURVEYOR
November 13, Xg67.
Is:. Tract Hap 22762
Schedule A - Teen' SP
Ladtes and Gentlemen: :
' treet tm rovemeet plans Ind/OT road dedications tn accordance wt~h
conditions are essential parl:s and a requirement occurring ~n Oit[ ts as b~ndtng
as though ~ccurrtng ~n a11. They are intended to be complementary ann to
describe t~e conditions for a complete design of the improveDeel-- All questions
regarding ~he true meaning. of the conditions shall be referred. to the Road
Com4sstoner'S Office.
'i-' The ~anddtvtder' Sha~l'protect downstream ~roperttes from Ukmages '-
cause by alteration of the' drainage_ patterns, I.e., coneDelta-
Zion of diversion of tidy. Protection shall be provided by
constructing adequate drainage facilities including enlarging
ex4sttn facilities or by secur4n a drainage easement or by
obstructions, or encroacbnents by land ~tlls are allowed", The
protectSon shall be as approved by the bad I)epar'aent,
The landdtv4der lha11 accept and properly dispose of all offsite
drstnane fiering onto or through the stte, In the event the
Road Ci~ndss¶oner parndts the use of streets for drainage '
PU oses, the p.~_.stons of Art$cle Xl of Ordinance No, 460
Drift'applY- S~oeld the qusntSt~es exceed the street
capac¶t3r or the use of streets be proMb~ted for drainage
the subdivider shall prodde adequate drainage
iNrposes,
factlStteS as approved by the bad Department,
· Tra~ Nap 22762
·" KOvember 13, 1987
Page 2
3. lb:~or dratnage tstnvolved on thts landdivision and tts resolution
shall be ms approved by the bad Deparlaenl;;
4o Streets abe, eD' Shall be taproved ~lthtn the dedicated rtght of
my tn acco.rdanCe vith County Standard No, 104, Sectton A. (40'/
60' ).
'Street 'C' shall be (mproved rtthtn the dedicated rSght of my tn
accordance vlth County Standard No. 105, bctton A..(36'/60').
6. Street *A* shall be bproved v4th 34 feet of asphalt concrete
pavement within a 45 foot part-width dedicated right of way tn
accordance vith County Standard No. 103, Secl:(on A. (22'/33').
7. Concrete s(dewslks' ';truSted throughout the landdtvtsSon
8, A pr(mary and second·tit access road to the nearest paved road
maintained bjr the County shall :be constructed vltMn the public
r~ght of way 4n accordance vlth County Standard RO, 106s Section
6 · grade and alignment as approved bjr the Road
S. (32'/0') at
_r_---riss~oner. Th4s (s neeass·r3 for c~rculatton purposes.
9. Pr(or to the record·lion of the final maps the developer shall
depostt wtth the RIverside CountJr Road Deparaent, a cash sum oT
$150.00 per lot as "fittgatton for traffic s(gnal ampacts. Should
the developer choose to defer the ·1me of paFuent, he* my enter
~mprovement plans shall be based upon a centerltne roftle
extendSrig a "fin(Bum of 300 feet beyond the pro:inca I~undartes at
a grade and alignment as upproved bjr the R~verstde Countjr Road
-Cogntss(oner. Completion of rOad ~mproveaents does not tmply
acceptance for m~ntenance by County.
11. Electrical and comuntcat~ons trenches shill be provtded tn
accordance k~th Ordinance 461,: Standard 817.
12, Aspbaltic mulston (fog seal) Shall be applied not less than
fourteen days following placement of the asphalt surfacing and
shall be ap 1gad at a rate of 0.05 gallon per square yard.
Asphalt anu~;(on shall conform to Sections 37, 39 and 94 of the
State Standard Specifications.
..;' ~:r~-r. HAp 22762
Nov. e~ber 13o 1987
~' Page '3.
Standard cul-de-sacs shall be constructed throughout 'the land
division,
Corner cutbacks ~n conformnce vtth County Standard liD. 805 shall
be sho~n on the ffnal mp and offered for dedication.
The ' landdtvider shall cnnply idth the Caltran~ reconnendattons as
outlined in their letter dated October 20, ]987 copy of ~htch ts
attached), prior t~ the recordatton of the final rap.
linddivider shall provide utility clearance from Rancho Csltf-
Mater District prior to the recordalton qf the ftnal map.
A copy of the final mp shall be submitted to coltruns. Dtstrtct
08. Post Office Box 231. In Be~na~tno, collfornta 92403;
Attention: PTO;JeCt Development for revte~ and approval prior to
recordatton.
The minimum cantorline redtt shall be 300' or as approved b}. the
Road Commissioner.
The minimum lot frontages alon9 the cul-de-sacs and knuckles shall
be 35 feet.
All d~tvewa~s shall confore to the applicable Riverside County
Standards.
The minimum garage sethack shall be 30 f, et measured from .the face
of cUrb.
All centerline tritersections shall be at gO' vith a a~tntmum 50'
tangent ,measured from ~ov 1tee.
The street design and tmprovment concept of this pro;Ject shall be
-coordinated with TR 22761, TR 21760 and SP 280.
Vet/truly 3murs,
bad Dtvtsion Engineer
GH:lh
dOS0 Zamo~ St. RIVERSIDE
R~verside, ~ 92S01 - P~NNING DEPA~
~ ~ 22?62: king 8 ~d~v~st~ of portions of Lots
2, · i 8 B~ock Z0 ud I por~S~ o~ ~L8 ~ S IS B~ock Z9
Pa~a bud ~d e~ter Co, as wh~ by. ~ filed in Book
PaVe S27 ~ bps, beerde of 2~ Diego C~ty
ifo~ix.
Lots)
Gent I emen:
The Department of Public Health has reviewed Tentative Hap
~*.No;~2762 and recommends that=
Jt water system shall be installed according to
plans and specification as approved by the water
company and the Health Department. Permanent
prints of the plans of the vices system shall
be submitted in triplicate, With a minimum scale
not less than one inch equals 222 feet, along v~th
the original drawing to the County. Surveyor. The
prints shall show the tn~ernal pipe diameter,
location of Yalves and firs hydrants; pipe and
joint specifications, and the size of the main
at the junction of the new system to the
existing system. The plans Shall comply in
all respects with Div. 5, Part l, Chapter ? of
thl California Health and Safety Code, California
Administrative Code, Title 22, Chapter ~6, tnd General
Order He. 323 of the Public Utilities Commission of the
State of California,when applicable. The plans shall
be signed by a registered engineer and water company
with the following certificattm~: 'I certify that the
design of the v~ter oyster in Tract Map 22762 is
accordance vi'th the water system expansion plans of the
Ranthe California T~a~er District and that the vater
serY~ce, storage and distribution system will be
adequate to provide water serYice to such tract,
This certification does not constitute a guarantee that
it will supply water to such tract at any specific
quantities, flows or pressures for fire protection or
any .other purpose'.
Riw rsi~le County Pla~ning Department
Page Two ~
Dct. ober 5. 1967
This certification shall be signed by a responsible
official of the ester company.
2M~B~LLted to th~ CpuOtv Survevor's Office to reXlt_v
a~_ltilt_t!g_~tt~L~£1Br to the re,nest
rf~R~Zd&tion of
ThXs bpartment".bss a statement from-the itsncho Cal.tfornia
Water District agreeing to serve domestic valor to each and
every lot in the stzbdivision ms demand providing
sattsfactbry financial arrangements are completed with the .
subdivider, It viII be necessary for the financ.~al
arrangements to be made*prior .to the recordalien of the
f~nal map.
This. Department has a statement from the Astern
Water D~etrict agreeing to alloy the subdtYiston sewage
system to be connected to the severs of the' Dtstrgct. The
sewer System shall be installed according to plans and
specifications as approwed by the District. the County
Surveyor and the Health Department. Permanent prints of the
plans of the sever system shall be sutnnitted ~n triplicate.
alon2 with .the original drawing. to th~ County 2urveyor. The
prints shall show the Lnternal pipe diameter. location of
manholes. complete profiles, pipe and .joint
.and the stze-~r the sewers-at the jtmctiot~ .of tl~e new system
to the oxilting system. A single plat indicating location
of sewer l~nes and water lines shall be a portion of the
sewage plans and profiles. The plans shall be signed by a
registered engineer and the sever distr,ct wLth the
following cert,fication: 'I certify that the design of the
sever lyetom Ln TraCt Map 22722 is Ln accordance v~th the
sever System oxpanlton plans of the Astern MLmicipal Voter
District and that the waste disposal system is adequate at
this t~me to treat the anticipated wastes from the proposed
tract. '
2g£xax EZS_ f ice to rev_lev__aL tatL_tv_2 ttea_l iRE_ --tbe
£tg~!!L_~eE_tbe re Fe£ga~tgO_gfthLf in& 1 -oR -
It will be-neceslary for the financial arrangements to be
made prior to the recordorion of the final map.
2~ncermly,
P. o. a~z seas
~t tied) ?elude1
RIVEF~IDE COUNTY' FL.OC)D CONTROL- AND
WATER CONSERVATION DIr/'RICT
October 7, 1987
Tract 22762
Well defAned ridges and watercourses are the main geographical ~ea-
lures in this area. Storm runoff both from Tract 22761 to the east
and ~n this property is designed t~ be carried b~ interior street
system and outletted at the mouthwest corner to · culvert under-
neath the freewayi' -A~cording to the tentative map, storm runoff '
generated b~ a part of the northwest portion of this tract would
d£vertmd o
~ollowing are the Dlstv~ct's recommendations s
This tract is located within the limits of the Hurtiota
Creek/Tamecula Valley Area Drainage. ~lan for v..hich drainage
fees have been adopted b~r the Board. Drainage fees shall
be paid as set forth tm~er the Zn~visions of the "Rules and
Regulations foF AdministTat~on of Area Drainage Plan·',
amended bWUI7 3, ZD84S
Drainage fees shall be. paid to the Road q~4esioner as
part of the ~lling f~: record of the. subdivision
eel map is waived, ~a be paid as ·
condition of the waiver prior to recording ·
cats of compliance evidenci~g the waiver of the parcel
At the option of-the land divider, upon filing a re-
quoted affidavAt requesting de ferment of the payment of
feeBe the drainage fees shall be paid to the Buildin~
Director st the ttme of issuenee of · grading permit
building permit for each approved parcel, vhichever mar
be first obtained after the recording of the subdivi-
sion final map or parcel mapf boyever,
B/verside Coun=y
Planning Department
Rea Tract 22762
October 7, 1987
Ce
Dr·ln·V· fees shall be laid to the R~ad C~---issicner as
· part of the fiLtnV fur record of the subdivision
~4,.-~ up ~ ~cel up, ~ hfore receiving ~ niver
~ reco~ I Z~ ~YLs~on, ~ uch Xot ~t~ ~ l~d
division v~re ~s~uc~on ac~v~ as evidenced ~
~e of ~ ~11~g Ic~ou ~s ~c~ s~ce ~ 2~,
· (a) A Fading partit or building pemit has been
obtained.
(b)
Grading or structures have been initiated.
Onsite drainage facilities located outside of road right of
way should be conMined within drainage easements shown on
t~e final map, A note should be added to the f/am1 map
stalLrig, 'Drainage easements stall be kept free of build-
ings tad obstru~Lons'.
Offsite drainage facilities should be located within
publicly dedicated drainage easements obtained from
· ffected propen7 owner(s), The document(s) should be
recorded and a col~ submitted to t, he District prior to
recordat/on of the f~nal map.
Jell IoU should be graded to drain to the adjacent s~reet
or an adequate outlet,
S. ' The 10 =ear storm fl~w should be contained within the curb
and the 100 year storm flow should be contained within the
s~reet right of way. When either of these criteria are
exceeded, additional drainage facilit~es should be
lnsUlled.
The propertT's street and lot grading should be designed in
· manner that parpatuates the existing natural drainage
patterns with respect to tributary drainage area and outlet
points o
Temporary erosion c~ntrol measures should be implemented
immediately following rough 'grading to prevent deposition
of debris onto downstream-properties or drainage
faclli~/es ·
giverside county
Planning Department
Re = Tract 22762
O=tober 7, 1987
~e
Drainage faeixAtAes outXe U. ng .unp eondktione ehould ~
design~ ~ ~vey ~ ~l~~ lO0 ye~ s~ fi~s.
~l~on~ e~g~ esca~ s~d 2so ~ p~v~ded.
A c~ of ~ ~~a~t 'plus, ~ad~g pl~s ~d final
ealc~a~ons s~d ~ suh~tted ~ ~e D~s~ct for review
~d ap~v~ pr~cr ~ recCrda~cn of ~e final map.
Grading pl~s s~d ~ a~ed prior ~ ~ssuance of
gradhg ~~.
Questions c~neerning th~s matter may be' referred t~ Padbert Ch~ang
of this of~J. ce at 714/787-2333.
Vez7 truly yours,
cc, nS/LowrX
EASBUBA
CAvil Engineer
~E COUNT'~
FIRE DEPARTMENT
t4 COOF Ir :.TION Wffl4 THE
~M.II~ORHIA DEPARTMENT CIF ILL r..Ul..¢
.ZO.-e-87
flee l~=~ Groved
~.s.s~
b ~
~fiU~t el
The =eqUl. red water steam, including fin h2rdrmlU, 8ha~l be lnsUlled 'and
accepted by the appropriate watt: eVehey Jzioz to iu~ eXMBIFdS~ ~zil4ing
uater~al _b~Lng ~lacod on u l.nd.t'rLdul. lot.. '
All buildings shall be constructed vJ.t:b fin retardant roofing mate:tel as
desc:~bed Lu Section 3203 of the Uniform BuildLAg Code. Any rood shLngles
o~ shakes shall have m Chms el' =aU~V and sha~ be a~pr~ve~ b7 the r/ze
:Pr4_~_- to the '._~,~atJ~n of the final map, the develops: shall de sl~ vl~ ~e
~nt, he/~ my ~t~ ~U a wZtten e~eu~t ~ ~e ~ d~e=i
All questions regardLeg the meanLeg of the conditions shall be refe::ed to the
tl:e CepaFtmnt :PlaAnLnV and Zngineer~nV sta~. -
. ' RiVERbiDE COU C ,
PLAnninG DEPARCm_F.C
DATE: September 1, 1987
Surveyor - Dave Du~ ~. ' I ' *
Rokd Dep rtaenl:" · .
Health - Ralph L~cbs*. ~ C)C~
Ftre Protection 09 RECEIVED
Ftsh S Sue " OCT 6 1987 '*'
LAFCO ~ Vlerra
servtce- bth E. gl~Mao~ ,.
U.S. Poe ?ALOMAR
Dencho Callf.
Southern Caltf. Edtson
Southern Callf. Gas
General Telephone
Dept. of Trmns rtatton 18
-Tamecalm Unton
Tametale Chamber of Comere
fit. PslOmar.
County 4brary
Cumtss~oner Bresson
TRAff 22762 - (SP) - E.A. 31943 - Kat
Development - lIDS/Lowry - Rancho
California DIstr~ct - FIrst SuperVtsc
Dtstrict- Southwest corner of Re~chc
California Road and
- 16 acres trite 51 lots - (Related c
TR 21760FFR 22761 & CZ 5007) - Hod
A,P, 923-020-038
Please review the use described above, along vtth the attached use map. A Land
Dtvts~0n Committee neattrig haS' been tentatJ~e~y scheduled for October. 8, 1987, If
clears, tt ~11 then go to publfc healing,
Your comnents end recumendat(ons are requested prior to October 1, 1987 tn order
may tnclude them In the staff repo~ for .thts particular use,
Should you have any questions regarding tMs 1tern, please do not hast tile to cont&ct
~eff Welnstetn-at 787-1363 -.
Planner
DATE: loI6187 SIGNATURE
PLEXS[ prfi t am and tttle
· alCOA I Cil/~kl Oq"DC~'aP' Fl~a,e ~ l~.P'sent, '-- .... ~' -
q
-,;
CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
TIll DIRIC'TDI PAIDblAB DIIr. IVATDIT lef.-zl
ie ~equut chat the destin f.at. ocher Cylm of outdooF 3~hr-tnlq t~t my k
Etep. to ~t ~ ~de: .
2, Oz~ent and e!~LeZd ZiShC to ~,,,.v t direct upua:d S~nac~n,
· . ~se ~w~tessu~e sodira ~s for toa~ay8, ~vs, equSmnc tales,
need ~c be caned of~ at ~:~ p.L
furCheF lnforuaCtou, u2.]. (828) 356-.4035.
Robert J. Btucato
Assistant l)l~ecco:
T.C. Rmn
!-am~p 7, Tedm
DimMr d ~'-'-
Normu 7, T!mma
:Dimcur d Ad~r-adm -
Rum aria Tedmr
I'
Oc~c~ ?, 1987
]t:Lvarsida Coun~ ~ZeAr~n~ Depar~m~
lteter'en~a: Trac~ 22?62
:Please be advised ~hat the aboye-reference~
cal~ocr~La Ware: Dtst:~c'c, Water se:v~ce, thezefcjze,
vould be available upon conpla~ion oZ ZinanC~a2
arrangements betroan RCk'D and the propert~ ovner.
Water avallabllit7 vould be contingent u~ the
proper~y ovnar - signing an Agency Agreement ~hict
assigns wa~ar management righUt if any, ~o RC~D.
lZ RCHD can be oZ Zur~her sewice to. you, please
· contac~ 'this oZZica, .'
Very 'truly yours,
RANCliO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT
Engineering Services Representa~ive
4
DATE: September 2, 1.987
=IiVE=I:biDE coun ,u
PLAnflinG DEPA=ICiTIEnC
TO: Assessos-
lut]dtng end Safety
Surveyor - Dave !:)uda
bad Departaent
Health, Ralph Lads
Fire I~teGtton
Rood Centrol District
Fish & rmae
LAFCO f~u Vterra
D,S, PosU~ ~rvlca - krCh. E, Davidsen
-' Rantfie Callf, · ·
Southern Callf, Edison
Southese Callf. Gas
General iTelephene
Dept. of Trans rU~ton ill
Murrleta Schoo~°
-Tamecull Union
Temecult Ch-~m of ~mMrce
I~. Pal0mr
County tbrary
Comtss~L~r Dresson
OCT 0 9 1987
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
PLANNING DEP, ARTMENT
TRACT ~2762- (SP)- E,A, 31943 - Ks4:
Development - IBS/Lovry - Rancho
CallforMs Dtstrtct- FIrst SuperYIsoz
District - Southeat corner of Pancho
California bad and Ynu Road - R-R Zc
- 16 lcrts Into S1 lots - (Related ca:
Tit 22760/TR 22762 & CZ 5007) - Hod
A.P. 923-020-038
Please rede~ the uie described above, along vtth the attached use rap. A Land
· DIvision Ittee meeting hu been tentatively scheduled for October 8, 1987, Xf tt
clears, t~m~11 then go to Fa.bllc. hurtage
1
~ nclu~ ~m tn ~ surf ~ for ~ls ~tculir use.
Should 3mu hive any Westtons regarding thiS'lima, please do not hesitate to conact
Oeff Wainstein at 787-1363
I~lanner.
Node of.e future deZtvery: centrsZLzed. Contact vith U.S.P.S. Grovth
Coordinator required before construction for deZlvery Zetalions.
name. end tltle ·
4080 LEMON STREET, P FLOOR
RIVERSIDE. CALIFORNIA 92501
~1'41787-61 El
46-209 OASIS STREET, ROOM 304
INDIO. CALIFORNIA 922D1
ZIATE: September ], lj;87
:liVE:BiDE COUI'I-,
PLAnninG DEPAR;F I;
TO: AssessOr
But 1 dt ng End Safe1~
Jteslth';- Ralph Leclu
FIsh & Same .-
Service - Iluth E, Davidson
Rancho Callf.
Southern Callf, Edison
Dept.. Of Trans rotton t1
Itun-te~ Scho:~°
· T~mecu;a tin'in
· Temecu'8 Chamber of Coenerce
lit. Ps'mmr
County L¢brar/
Co==tsStone,r Iresson
OCT 0 ? 1987
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
~RACT 22762 - (5P).- E,A, 31943 - Ks
Developrant - IIB$/Lov~y .- Rancho:
C41tfornIa DIstrict - FIrst $upe-vts
Dtstrlct - Southwest comer of
California bed and Ynez bad -;I-R
- 16 acres lnto 51 lots - (Related c
TR 21760/1122761 i CZ 5007) - Hod.."
A.P. 923-020-038 ".'-
?lease review the use described above, alon with the attached use rap. A Land
Dtvtston ComMttee mettrig has been tentath~ly scheduled for October .8, 1987, if tt
.. 'clears, tt wi1.1 the go to pdbllc hearing, . .. :.. .. .-
Tour comesis and recomendattons are requested p'tor to October 1, 1987 tn order tha
may Include them tn the staff repor~ for thts iarttculsr use,
Should )~u hays any questions reglrdtn9 this tim, please do not heSttste to contact
Jeff kfetnstetn at 787-1363
Planner -
· PLEAS[ prfn~ aim and tttle
-408D LEMON STREET. P FLOOR 46-209 OASIS STREET, ROOM 3C
,~..~=,'.-- .... ,.~-~s~,..~ .-.,~o,,,ue,os.,o,mcr
' D~'PARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
October 2,0,;"1987
OCT 22 B87
RIVERStDc_ COUN"rY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Planning Department
County of Riverside .
Attention Mr. Jeff Veinstein
Q080 Lemon Street
'llverslde,..CA 92501
D~ar at. Veinstein:
Development Revlew
Da-Rlv-15-4 -83
Tour Reference:
TTM'R2761 end
T~M 22762
Thank you for the opportunity to review proposed rfH 22761 and
T~N22762 located Southwesterly of Ranoho California Road and ~nez
Road, east of Interstate 15 in Ranthe California,
Please refer to the attached material on which our eon~ents have
been tndicate~ by the 1tens checked and/or by those 1tams noted
under additional cements, .
If any vo~k Is necessary**vlthin .thi irate high~e7 right of way,
the developer must obtain an encroachment permit from the
Dtatriict 8 Office of the State Department of Transportation prior
to beginning the vork,
Zf sddltlonal informstlon is deslred, please csZl ~r.
'Connal!ly ~t (7~Q) 383-~38~-
Patrick H.
Tery truly yours,
CXcx.u-
the traffl= and drainage Irarated by this propreal do not appear
meeenasm/ ttgat,8 the a,m,t~t,,tve lslpuet, of traf'.flo and dru:L,'mge ~ be
· TehSu4m- ae~Ja not. be developed direoil7 to the stata blglvay,
__ Td',i~Jlr a~cua t~ the state highway be protided by exlstlng publlo road
,__, ~.eblmlar scs:e. ss to the state highkra~r be lrov~ded by standard
Wehicsahr ames to the state M~ be provided by a rmd-t3rpe cormcotton,
' icc'cmJ. rliht or k~r dedtca~on to provide-
orb and .pttr, Stata ~tan.d~d..' aZmg 't~e state highray,
__ Pr~n4 be pr~bSt~ ,~q ~e g~ ~$~my by ~t~g t~ ~rb r~
mnd/~r by the ~ placement of sno par~ ilns.
- _ ·
~ radi~s ~urb retm-ns be provtded at Intersections vlth the state higb~sy.
standard M'eelo~iz. raz:p eat, be Irm, ided t· the returu.
___ · positive vehicular ~arrler alq t~e proper~ frontage be provided to limit'
ha~-~ldth m the state 'hi2h~a~.
. , balr-vidth m the state higb4y.
It iS ~ogntzed that there is emaiderable public omom-n abn.,t noise levels
sdJaeent t~ heavily traveled hlihraTs. :Land develqn~en~, In order t~ be attb
- .,~ Zt that the traffic and dralmla Irontad by ~ p~l ~ld ~ a
-,' . ~~ -
s$
t cop7 or any conditions of approval or r~vised approval. ·
A copy 'of s~T dockeats providing sdditlonal' state hi2ha~ ri2ht of nay t~on
"" s~eer~r. im at t~s ssp.
'* entrance £s'c~ the sts~e hilnsY- ·
' ~Z- this ~Y ~ ~~e ~d ~~ ~ e~st~
~ge ~t~ ~ ~ s~ ~~e ~t a ~Y ~a~le ~1~ is not
~--,~-~ve ~as~ s~ ~
~~,
ATTACHMENT 5
FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT
CITY OF TEMECULA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT
TRACT MAP NO. 22762
DATE: June 25, 1992
IMPROVEMENTS
Streets and Drainage
Water
Sewer
TOTAL
FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE
SECURITY
$ ~55,000.00
$ 6q,500.00
$ 57,500.00
$ 577,000.00
MATERIAL F, LABOR
SECURITY
$ 227,500.00
$ 32,500.00
$ 29,000.00
$ 288.500.00
*lbtntenance Retention (10i; fer one 3mar)
*{or Bonds if work ts cmpleted)
$ 57,700.00
Monument Security
City Traffic Signing and Striping Costs
Fire Mitigation Fee
RCFC Drainage Fee Due
Signalization Mitigation Fee - SMD #9
Road and Bridge Benefit Fee
Other Developer Fees (Quimby)
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
16,170.00
-0-
20,000.00
-0-
7,500.00
-0-
58,500.00
Planning Department Fee
Comprehensive Transportation Plan Fee
Plan Check Fee
Inspection Fee
Monument Inspection Fee
$
$
$
$
$
151.00
8.00
1,750.-00
19,103.00
808.50
Total Inspection/Plan Check Fees
Less Fees Paid To Date (Credit)
Total Inspection/Plan Check Fees Due
$
$
$
21,820.50
21,820.50
-0-
AGENDAS/ARO06
ITEM
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
City Manager/City Council
FROM:
Mary Jane Henry, Finance Officer
DATE:
July 14, 1992
SUBJECT:
Purchase of 800 Megahertz Radio System
Prepared by Grant M. Yates, Senior Management Analyst
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the purchase of an 800
Megahertz (MHZ) radio system and appropriate $29,671 from Unreserved Fund
Balance.
DISCUSSION: The City is in need of a system that will allow for
communication between the field employees and the supervisors in the office. In
addition, the City is in need of e communication system that will ensure that vital
communication capabilities remain in tact in the event of an emergency.
To date, field personnel have utilized a combination of cellular telephones or pagers
to communicate. These methods of communication tend to be inefficient for the
following reasons. Cellular telephones are not portable beyond the City vehicle and
employees who are paged must leave the job site and travel to a pay phone to
respond to a page.
Staff worked closely with the communications expert from Riverside County to design
a cost effective communication system that would serve the City's needs. The City
identified the following needs in purchasing a system; 1) the system must be able to
provide an effective communications net that will cover all areas of the City; 2) the
system must allow for communication capability with local law enforcement and; 3)
the system must allow for the City to expand in the future.
Based upon the above criteria, it was determined that the City should purchase an
800 MHZ system that needs to be programmed to operate on both the Palomar
Mountain and the Lake Elsinore transmitter stations. The advantage to this system
is that it will allow for radio coverage in all areas of the City. The two transmitter
systems will also provide communication if one transmitter becomes disabled in a
disaster. The 800 MHZ system is also compatible with the new system the Riverside
Sheriff's Office has installed. The Temecula Fire Department is on a conventional VHF
radio system, therefore, the City has purchased a disaster case radio that will ensure "-
that this communication capability is available.
The City sent Requests for Proposals (RFP) to sixteen firms and received responses
from five firms. Of these five, three failed to meet the City's specifications. The two
that met the specifications and provided a price quote included:
Firm Name
Price Prooosal
Advanced Mobil Comm
of San Diego
27,652.77
Comtronix of Hemet
9 25,578.89
These prices include installation, labor and parts for ten vehicle based mobile radios,
six hand held radios and four base stations (one of the base stations will be located
at the City's Emergency Operations Center (EOC) located at the Southwest County
Sheriff's Station). There is a monthly service charge for operation of the SMR
repeater stations on Palomar Mountain and on Elsinore Peak. This charge is 918.00
per radio and 921.00 per base station which totals 94,092 for the 1992-93 Fiscal
Year.
Based upon the above information, it is staff's recommendation to purchase the 800
MHZ radio system from Comtronix of Hemet. Comtronix is one of the major suppliers
of radio equipment to public agencies in Riverside County.
FISCAL IMPACT: The funds for this project were available in the FY 1991-92
Fiscal Year Budget. However, the RFP process was not completed before the end of
the fiscal year and the appropriation lapsed to General Fund, Fund Balance. Therefore,
the funds for this purchase, including the monthly service charge totals 929,671 and
needs to be appropriated from the General Fund Unreserved Fund Balance to Account
001-199-999-44-5610.
ITEM
NO.
14
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
City Council/City Manager
Department of Public Works
DATE: July 14, 1992
SUBJECT: Contract Change Orders on Project No. PW91-03 Rancho California
Road Benefit District
PREPARED BY: .'~) ~ Douglas M. Stewart, Deputy City Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council:
A. Approve the attached Contract Change Orders consisting of:
A $828.30 increase in contract amount due to removal of signal controller base
and installation of at-grade foundation for the new controller.
A $700.00 increase in contract amount for raising seven (7) water valves
located after excavation started·
A $1,423.80 increase in contract amount due to reconstruction of one (1)
manhole to be removed down to shaft and reconstructed per Public Works
Standard Specifications.
A $1,257.50 increase in contract amount due to additional equipment and
unusual work conditions required to make slope grade due to Southern
California Edison's moving two additional poles located within right-of-way.
Advance $4,209.60 from the Development Impact Fund to the Reimbursement District
Fund and appropriate $4,209.60 to Account No. 011-165-605-44-5804.
Page 1 of 2 pw01~agdrpt~92~0714\pw91-03.cco 0702a
BACKGROUND:
The contract for street improvements under construction on Rancho California Road between
Lyndie Lane and Margarita Road (Project No. PW91-03) was awarded to Oliver Bros. on
March 10, 1992 for the sum of $499,716.85, plus a 10% contingency, for a total of
$549,688.54. These improvements are part of the Margarita Village Specific Plan Agreement
with the City and as such, are all being reimbursed through additional building permit fees up
to a $2,000,000 cap. Also, included in that Agreement are the improvements being
constructed on the I-15/Rancho California Road overpass. Taking into account all funds
encumbered to date for both projects and the reimbursement to the developers for costs
associated with engineering, $339,351.40 remains on balance prior to the $2,000,000 cap
being reached.
The Contract Change Orders consist of:
CCO//006: A $828.30 increase in contract amount due to removal of signal controller base
and installation of at-grade foundation for the new controller.
CCO #007: A $700.00 increase in contract amount for raising seven (7) water valves
located after excavation started.
CCO #008:
A $1,423.80 increase in contract amount due to field conditions requiring that
one (1) manhole be removed down to shaft and reconstructed per Public Works
Standard Specifications.
CCO #009:
A $1,257.50 increase in contract amount due to additional equipment and
unusual work conditions required to make slope grade due to Southern
California Edison's moving two (2) additional poles located within right-of-way.
FISCAL IMPACT:
On March 10, 1992 the City Council approved the appropriation of $499,716.85, plus a 10%
contingency of $49,971.68 for a total of $549,688.54. Therefore, only the additional
appropriation of $4,209.60 above the 10% contingency is required at this time to the Capital
Project Account No. 011-165-605-44-5804.
Attachments:
Contract Change Orders #006 through #009
Page 2 of 2 pwOl~agdrpt\92\0714\pw91-03.cco 0702a
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
PROJECT:
CONTRACT NO:
June 12, 1992
Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
Jack L. Hodson, Sr. Public Works Inspector
RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD. BENEFIT DISTRICT
PW91-03
CCO NO: 006
$ DECREASE
CONTRACT: PW91-03
$ 828.30 INCREASE
THIS CHANGE PROVIDES FOR:
Removal of existing signal controller base and installation of at-grade foundation for new
controller cabinet. Existing base causes new controller cabinet to be too high for the safety
of persons working inside of the cabinet due to a change in the design of the cabinet.
CCO DISCUSSED WITH:
1. City Engr:
2. Deputy City Engineer:
3. Other:
Prior Appr. By: Date:
Line Items:
Force Acct:
Adjustments:
Agreed Price:
ESTIMATE OF COST
$828.30
TOTAL:
$828.30
pwO 1 \pw91-03~cco\006 0612
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 006
CONTRACT NO. PW91-03
PROJECT:
TO:
NOTE:
RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD BENEFIT DISTRICT SHEET 1__ of
OLIVER BROTHERS
This chanoe order is not effective until aooroved by the Enoineer.
CHANGE REQUESTED BY: Project Inspector
I. INCREASE IN CONTRACT QUANTITIES AT AGREED PRICES:
A. Removal of existing signal controller base and install new base ~ sidewalk
grade.
CCO-O06-1A, R & R - I ~ $828.30 -- ............................ '. $828.30
ESTIMATE OF INCREASE AT AGREED PRICE: ....................... $828.30
By reason of this Order, the time of completion will be adjusted as follows: 3 DAYS
Submitted: Project Inspector B .,'~.i~ :" . 1._. Date:
Approved: Deputy City Engr. Dam: ~'/11,,/~
We the undersigned contractor have given careful consideration to the change proposed and
hereby agree. If this proposal is approved, that we will provide all equipment, furnish all
materials, except as may otherwise be noted above, and perform all services necessary for
the work above specified, and will accept as full payment therefore the prices shown above.
Date Accepted: ':~ -3 ~ ~ -~- Contractor: .('7..;LT.L,,,~-!L/~ 7',~,~_.~
By: .-7'-,~/.~,, ' Title: .~ ~_~ ~r< =,~.: T~-..,,j,.~..,,~T
If the contractor does not sign acceptance of this order, his attention is directed to the
requirefnents of the specifications as to proceeding with the ordered work and filing a written
protest within the time therein specified.
4_~ 174 I~USI.~ESS PA~K DRIXTE · TEMECULA. CALIFOI~NIA 9<2590 · PHONE (714) 694- |989 · FAX (7 14) B.~OL'd.~V. 91-03\CCo~,006 0612
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
PROJECT:
MEMORANDUM
June 30, 1992
Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
Jack L. Hodson, Sr. Public Works Inspector
RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD. BENEFIT DISTRICT
CONTRACT NO:
PW91-03
CCO NO: 007
$ DECREASE
CONTRACT: PW91-03
$ 700.00 INCREASE
THIS CHANGE PROVIDES FOR:
Raise seven (7) water valves located after excavation started.
CCO DISCUSSED WITH:
1. City Engr:
2. Del~uty City Engineer:
3. Other:
Prior Appr. By: Date:
ESTIMATE OF COST
Line Items: 7c
Force Acct:
Adjustments:
Agreed Price:
TOTAL:
$100.00
$700.00
pw01\pw91-03\cco~O07 0702a
1989
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 007
CONTRACT NO. PW91-03
PROJECT:
TO:
NOTE:
RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD BENEFIT DISTRICT SHEET
OLIVER BROTHERS
This chanQe order is not effective until aDDroved by the EnQineer.
CHANGE REQUESTED BY: Project Inspector
I of 1__
INCREASE IN CONTRACT QUANTITIES AT CONTRACT UNIT PRICES:
1. Raise seven (7) valves @ $100/ea.
CCO-007-A1, Raise 7 valves @ $100/ea ........................... $700.00
ESTIMATE OF INCREASE AT CONTRACT UNIT PRICE: ................. $700.00
By reason of this Order, the time of completion will be adjusted as follows: NONE
Submitted: Project Inspector S ~~.-/~.~d~,._ ,. Date:
Approved: Deputy City Engr. B~ c~] ;~:~.:'~,:'~ Date: ', ,:/"-)~
/
We the undersigned contractor have given careful consideration to the change proposed and
hereby agree. If this proposal is approved, that we will provide all equipment, furnish all
materials, except as may otherwise be noted above, and perform all services necessary for
the work above specified, and will accept as full payment therefore the prices shown above.
Date Accepted:
Contractor:
Title:
If the contractor does not sign acceptance of this order, his attention is directed to the
requirements of the specifications as to proceeding with the ordered work and filing a written
protest within the time therein specified,
4_~174 ~USlNE55 PARK DRI~'E · TEMECULA. CALIFORNIA 9c~5¢3C' · PHONE (714) 694-1989 · F~X (714)1c~II)1~91-03\cco~007 07028
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
PROJECT:
CONTRACT NO:
MEMORANDUM
June 30, 1992
Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
Jack L. Hodson, Sr. Public Works Inspector
RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD. BENEFIT DISTRICT
PW91-03
CCO NO: 008 CONTRACT: PW91-03
$ DECREASE $ 1.423.80 INCREASE
THIS CHANGE PROVIDES FOR:
Reconstruction of a sewer manhole: field conditions dictated the manhole be removed down
to shaft thereby causing the manhole to be reconstructed per Public Works Standard
Specifications.
CCO D!SCUSSED WITH:
1. City Engr:
2. Deputy City Engineer:
3. Other:
Prior Appr. By: Date:
Line Items:
Force Acct:
Adjustments:
Agreed Price:
TOTAL:
ESTIMATE OF COST
$1,423.80
$1,423.80
pw01 ~pw91-03\cco\008 0630
CI. TY OF TEMECULA
CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 008
CONTRACT NO. PW91-03
PROJECT:
TO:
NOTE:
RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD BENEFIT DISTRICT SHEET 1_!.
OLIVER BROTHERS
This chanqe order is not effective until aooroved by the Engineer,
CHANGE REQUESTED BY: Project Inspector
of I
A. INCREASE IN CONTRACT QUANTITIES AT AGREED PRICES:
1. - Reconstruction of one manhole @ $1,423.80
CCO-008-A1, Reconstruct I manhole @ $1,423.80 .................. ~1,423.80
ESTIMATE OF INCREASE AT AGREED PRICE: ...................... $1,423.80
By reason of this Order, the time of completion will be adjusted as follows: NONE
Date: / /
Approved: Deputy City Engr. By. ~ · ~-~. .-c~/
We the undersigned contractor have given careful consideration to the change proposed and
hereby agree. If this proposal is approved, that we will provide all equipment, furnish all
materials, except as may otherwise be noted above, and perform all services necessary for
the work above specified, and will accept as full payment therefore the prices shown above.
Date Accepted: 7- 2- ~ 2 Contractor:
By: .7' .Z~ ~._.:_.. Title: ,.c;
If the contractor does not sign acceptance of this order, his attention is directed to the
requirements of the specifications as to proceeding with the ordered work and filing a written
protest within the time therein specified.
pw01\pw91-03\cco~008 0701
43174 [:>USlNES5 PAI~K DI~IVE · TEM, ECULA. C:ALIFO~NIA g~2590 · PHONE (714) 694'1-Q89 ® ~=AX (714) 694- 1999
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
PROJECT:
CONTRACT NO:
June 30, 1992
Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
Jack L. Hodson, Sr. Public Works Inspector
RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD. BENEFIT DISTRICT
PW91-03
CCO NO: 009
$ DECREASE
CONTRACT: PW91-03
$ 1,257.50 INCREASE
THIS CHANGE PROVIDES FOR:
Additional equipment and unusual work conditions required to make slope grade due to So.
Cal. Edison's moving two additional utility poles located within the right-of-way.
CCO DISCUSSED WITH:
1. City Engr:
2. Deputy City Engineer:
3. Other:
Prior Appr. By: Date:
Line Items:
Force Acct:
Adjustments:
Agreed Price:
TOTAL:
ESTIMATE OF COST
$1,257.50
$1,257.50
pwO1%pw91-03\cco\OO9 0701
CITY
OF TEMECULA
CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 009
CONTRACT NO. PW91-03
PROJECT:
TO:
NOTE:
CHANGE REQUESTED BY:
RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD BENEFIT DISTRICT SHEET
OLIVER BROTHERS
This change order is not effective until aDoroved bY the Enqineer.
Project Inspector
I of 1_!_
A. INCREASE IN CONTRACT QUANTITIES AT AGREED PRICES:
1. Slope construction - $1,257.50
CCO-009-A1, Slope construction @ .............................. ' ~1,257.50
ESTIMATE OF INCREASE AT AGREED PRICE: ...................... $1,257.50
By reason of this Order, the time of completion will be adjusted as follows: NONE
Submitted: Project Inspector By,- , ~'~'~.~---'l Date:
Approved: Deputy City Engr. B;'~'?.~..~,~_.~ ~ Date:
We the undersigned contractor have given careful consideration to the change proposed and
hereby agree. If this proposal is approved, that we will provide all equipment, furnish all
materials, except as may otherwise be noted above, and perform all services necessary-for
the work above specified, and will accept as full payment therefore the prices shown above.
Date Accepted: 7 - 2 - .9 2, Contractor: ~L_~ ~j_~'j fT,_ {.,Z/LC 7'N_~
By: ~4x'~-c ' Title: -S ~S y~ ,~." T'---,~J~.: Aj7
If the contractor does not sign acceptance of this order, his attention is directed to the
require~nents Of the specifications as to proceeding with the ordered work and filing a written
protest within the time therein specified.
4} 1 ;'4 5u.<i×ES5 PAi~k D~I%'E · TF.UFCUl..~. C.~i.IFO~N~A 9~.~90 · P~=.,;×I: (~14) ~,94-S989 · F~X (714)I~V'b~v91-03\CCO\009 0701
ITEM NO.
15
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Luci
Senior Management Analyst
July 14, 1992
Adoption of Personnel Resolution
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt a Resolution entitled "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Temecula
No. 92- , Establishing Position Titles and Salary Ranges.
BACKGROUND:
At the May 28, 1992 meeting, the City Council approved the Fiscal Year 1992-93
Budget. The Budget outlined the proposed positions for the fiscal year. The
Personnel Resolution reflects the ninety-five (95) authorized positions adopted in the
Budget document. The fiscal year increase in the number of authorized positions
results primarily from the transition from contract to in-house engineering services.
The adoption of Resolution 92- authorizes staff to proceed with the recruitments
of these positions.
In addition, a position adjustment is included to reflect the additional maintenance
duties being assumed by the Office Assistant/Facilities Technician, resulting from the
elimination of.the custodial services contract. The adjustment does not result in an
increas~ to the total number of authorized positions, as the Office Assistant/Facilities
Technician position has been eliminated and a Maintenance Worker position has been
added. The projected $4,500 cost of this adjustment does not require an additional
appropriation.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Appropriations for all of the authorized positions are included in the adopted Budget.
RESOLUTION NO. 92-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING POSITION
TITLES AND SALARY RANGES
WHEREAS, pursuant to the authority under Chapter 2.08.060 of the City's Municipal
Code, the City Manager has the authority to hire, set salaries and adopt personnel policies; and,
WHEREAS, the City Manager has recommended and the City Council now wishes to
adopt authorized positions, rifles and salary ranges;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of
Temecula as follows:
SECTION 1. The attached list of position Titles and Salaries (Exhibit A) is hereby
adopted pursuant to Section 45001 of the California Government Code. Such list is attached to
this Resolution and incorporated herein by this reference.
SECTION 2. The list of Position Titles and Salaries shall become effective immediately
and may be thereafter amended.
SECTION 3. The City Manager shall implement the above list of Positions Titles and
Salaries and has the authority to select and appoint employees in accordance with the City's
personnel policies.
SECTION 4. All prior resolutions and parts of resolutions in conflict with this
Resolution are hereby rescinded.
PASSED, AND ADOFrED by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular
meeting held on the 14th day of July, 1992
ATTEST:
Ronald J. Parks, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
Ruos 267
EXHIBIT 'A"
POSITION TITLES
AUTHORIZED
POSITIONS
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
Account Clerk 2
Account Technician 1
Accountant 0
Administrative Secretary 8
Assistant City Manager 1
Assistant Engineer 2
Assistant Planner 2
Associate Engineer 2
Associate Planner 2
Building Inspector 3
Chief Accountant 1
Chief Building Official 1
City Clerk 1
City EngineerlDir. of Public Works 1
City Manager 1
Code Enforcement Officer 1
Councilmember 5
Development Assistant 0
Deputy City Clerk 0
Director of Community Services 1
Director of Planning 1
Duplicating Technician 1
Engineering Technician 2
Executive Secretary 1
Finance Officer 1
Lead Maintenance Worker 1
Maintenance Superintendent 1
Maintenance Supervisor 1
Maintenance Worker 4
Management Analyst 0
Minute Clerk 0.5
Network Administrator 1
Office Assistant 14
Permit Engineer 1
Planning/Building Technician 5
Principal Engineer 2
Public Works Inspector 2
Recreation Leader 2
Recreation Superintendent 1
Secretary 2.5
Senior Accountant 1
Senior Building Inspector 2
Senior Development Assistant 1
Senior Maintenance Worker 1
Senior Management Analyst 3
Senior Planner 3
Senior Public Works Inspector 2
Senior Recreation Services Coordinator 1
Senior Services Coordinator 1
Traffic Engineer 0
Traffic Technician I
$1,600
$1,993
$2,498
$1,702
$5,763
$2,885
$2,464
$3,047
$2,885
$2,431
$3,377
$5,236
$4,148
$5,763
$2,193
$ 300
$1,926
$2.414
$5.236
$5.236
$1.303
$2,105
$2.285
$5.236
$1.835
$3.331
$3.331
$1.667
$2.498
$1.454
$2 498
$1 303
$3,047
$2 193
$3 794
$2 431
$1 424
$3 331
$1 454
$2 788
$2 675
$2 193
$1 926
$2 807
$3 424
$2 675
$1 836
$1 836
$3 047
$2 105
$1,993
$2,481
$3,111
$2,120
$7,176
$3,592
$3,068
$3.794
$3.592
$3.027
$4.205
$6.519
$5165
$7 176
$8 655
$2 731
$ 300
$2,398
$3,006
$6,519
$6,519
$1,624
$2621
$2846
$6519
$2285
$4 148
$4148
$2 076
$3 111
$1 811
$3 111
$1,624
$3 794
$2731
$4.725
$3.027
$1 774
$4148
$1 811
$3.471
$3.331
$2731
$2.398
$3,495
$4,236
$3,331
$2,285
$2,285
$3,794
$2,621
TOTAL 95.0
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City
Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 14th day of July,
1992, by the following vote of the Council:
AYES:
0 COUNCILEMBERS: None
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
June S. Greek, City Clerk
R=sos 267
ITEM
NO.
16
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUB/ECT:
APPROVAL _,.
CITY ATTORNEY ~ T _//
C~ OF ~
AGMA ~RT
City Counc~Ci~ M~ger
P~ning ~ent
July 14, 1992
A~ No. 24: A~ of P~g Commission ~ of Plot P~ No. 8839,
Revisfl No. 1, ~endfl No. 2 ~u~g l~atfl at 41910 S~ S~t)
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Department Staff recommends that the City Council:
ADOPT Resolution No. 92- , approving Appeal No. 24 based
on the Analysis and Findings contained in the Staff Report and
subject to the attached Conditions of Approval.
BACKGROUND
Appeal No. 24 was continued from the May 13, 1992 City Council meeting at the request of the
Council. Staff was directed to work with the applicant to address the issues raised by the
Planning Commission relative to p~rking requirements for proposed uses, adequacy of the alley
in the rear of the site, and the structural integrity of the second story. Subsequent to the May
13, 1992 City Council meeting, First Fidelity Thrift and Loan Association became the new
owners of the property. Representatives from First Fidelity requested that they be able to pursue
Appeal No. 24. Staff has accommodated their request.
Planning and Building and Safety Depamnent Staff met with First Fidelity Thrift and Loan on
June 3, 1992. The concerns of the Planning Commission were discussed and representatives of
First Fidelity Thrift and Loan agreed to address each of the concerns in order to obtain approval
for Appeal No. 24. Condition of Approval No. 33 addresses the Planning Commission and
Council concerns regarding improvement of the alley. This Condition states: "Construct full
alley improvements 20' in width including, but not limited to, A.C. pavement, and drive
'approachf across the length of the property. A flowline of 1 percent minimum shall be
constructed at the alley centerline." Staff recommends that this condition be expanded to add
the following language: "Grade differentials along the rear of buffclings shah be modified to
permit vehicular access to garages which are designated for parking use."
5~rAFFRIFI~4~P~L-C~ ~ I
Condition of Approval No. 14 requires "all existing garage spaces shall be used for parking of
vehicles which utilize the site. No other uses shall be permitted in the garage enclosure." Staff
recommends that the Condition be modified to read "Prior to Occupancy of the second story all
garage spaces shall be inspected to assure that they are in conformance with the above mentioned
requirements." This addresses the Planning 'Commissions concerns that the spaces shall be
functional for parking and not utiliT~l as office space or for any other use.
Condition of Appwval No. 1 is recommended to be modified from reading: "The use hereby
permitted by this plot plan is for conversion of uses on the second floor of an existing building
from 5,413 square feet of storage into a 780 square foot beauty shop, and 2,961 square feet of
storage space" to read: "The use hereby permitted by this plot plan is for the conversion of uses
on the second floor of an existing building fwm 5,413 square feet of storage space into 3,600
square feet of office space and 1,813 square feet of storage space."
Staff recommends that the following Conditions of Approval be added to those listed under
Building and Safety Department Conditions for Plot Plan No. 8839, Revised No. 1, Amended
No. 2:
M-1 (garage) occupancies must be separated from B-2 occupancies as required in Table
No. 5-B of the Uniform Building Code.
Second floor modifications on south wing must be completed prior to approval for first
occupancy.
e
West wing exiting for proposed occupancies must be plan checked and approved prior
to issuance of building permit.
Compliance with structural engineers' recommendation must be completed prior to first
occupancy of second floor.
It is Staff' s opinion that all of the City Council and Planning Commission' s concerns have been
addressed through the above refer.need amended Conditions of Approval as well as proposed
structural modifications to the building.
FISCAL IMPACT
None
Attachments:
Resolution N0. 92- - page 3
Correspondence - page 7
a. Letter to Mr. Dixon dated May 11, 1992
b. Letter to Lance Garrett dated June 23, 1992
5'~TAFFRFI~,4APPBAL.CC2 lab 2
ATTAINT NO. 1
RESOL~ON NO. 92-
lab :~
ATTACHMF-NT NO. 1
RESOLUTION NO. 9~-_
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING APPEAL NO. 24, T!~-REBY
APPROVING PLOT PLAN NO. 8839 REVISED NO. 1,
~ED NO. 2, CHANGING USES ON ~ SECOND
FLOOR PROM 5,413 SQUARE FEET OF STORAGE TO
3,600 SQUARE FEET OF OFFICE SPACE AND 1,813
SQUARE FEET OF STORAGE ON PROPERTY KNOWN AS
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 922-024-027.
WF!~.REAS, Temecula Sixth Street-A Limited California Panmership fried Plot Plan No.
8839 Revised No. 1, Amended No. 2 in accordance with the Riverside County Land Use,
Zoning, Planning and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference;
VVHT~REAS, said Plot Plan application was processed in the time and manner prescribed
by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing pertaining to said Plot
Plan on March 16, 1992, at which time interested persons had opportunity to testify either in
support or opposition to said Plot Plan; and
WYrEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, the Commission denied said
Plot Plan.
WIIEI~EAS, Appeal No. 24 was fried in the time and manner prescribed by state and
local law pertaining to the Planning Commission's denial of Plot Plan No. 8839, Revised No.
1, Amended No. 2;
WHERF. AS, the City Council conducted a public hearing pertaining to said Appeal No.
24 at which time it was continued for sixty (60) days.
WHE~, after sixty (60) days the City Council conducted a public hearing pertaining
to said Appeal No. 24 on July 14, 1992 at which time interested persons had an opportunity to
testify either in support or opposition to said Appeal; and
WHI~IRi?.AS, the City Council received a copy of the Staff Report regarding the Appeal;
NOW, TI~.~RE, ~ CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY OF TEMECULA
DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SXSTAFF~:'T~Arr~AL.CC2 ~b 4
Section I. Findings. That the Temecula City Council hereby makes the following
findings:
A. The City Council, in approving the appeal for the proposed Plot Plan No. 8839
Revised No. 1, Amended No. 2, makes the following findings, to wit:
1. There is a reasonable probability that Plot Plan No. 8839 Revised No.' 1,
Amended No. 2 wffi be consistent with the City's future adopted General Plan, which wffi be
completed in a reasonable time and in accordance with State law. Plot Plan No. 8839 Revised
No. 1, Amended No. 2 meets the parking standards as set out in the existing ordinances and
anticipated in the General Plan.
2. There is not a likely pwbability of substantial detriment to and interference
with the future General Plan, as a result of an approval. The project as conditioned is consistent
with Ordinance No. 348 and the SWAP and therefore it is likely to be consistent with General
Plan recommendations.
3. The proposed use or action complies with State planning and zoning hws. ·
The pwject as conditioned is consistent with Ordinance No. 348. Parking requirements have
been met as per Ordinance No. 348.
4. The site is suitable to accommodate the proposed land use in terms of the
circuhtion patterns, access, and intensity of use. The site has access off Sixth Street and
parking in the rear of the site will be accessible from the alley which will be improved to City
.Standards.
5. The project as d~signed and conditioned will not adversely affect the public
health or weftare due to provision of adequate parking. The proposed uses will require forty
(40) on-site spaces which are provided for.
6. The project is compatible with surrounding land uses. The alley would be
improved to City standards, and therefore the utilization of the garage spaces wffi not be a
burden to adjacent pwperties.
7. The design of the project, the type of improvements, and the resulting street
hyout are such that they are not in conflict with easements for access through or use of the
property within the proposed project.
t' 8~ Said findings are supported by minutes, maps and exhibits associated with
these applications and herein incorporated by reference. This Staff Report contains mapping and
Conditions of Appwval, which support the Staff recommendation.
B. As conditioned pursuant to SECTION m, the Plot Plan proposed conforms to the
logical development of its proposed site, and is compatible with the present and future
development of the surrounding property.
$WrAFI~,PT~IAPPBAL.CC2 lab 5
Section II. Environmental Compliance, The proposed Plot Plan No. 8839 Revised No.
1, Am6nded No. 2 is a Class 1 Categorical Exemption pursuant to Section 15301 (e)(1) of the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)' guidelines which pertains to minor alterations to
existing structures.
Section HI. Conditions. That the City of Tcmecula City Council hereby approves Plot
Plan No. 8839 Revised No. 1, Amended No.2 to revise Plot Plan No. 8839, changing uses on
the second floor from 5,413 square feet of storage to 3,600 square feet of office space and 1,813
square feet of storage and known as Assessor's Parcel No. 922-024-027.
Section IV. PASSEn, AlPROVED, AND ADOPTEr} this 14th day July, 1992.
PATRICIA H. BIRDSALL
MAYOR
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City
Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 14th day of July, 1992
by the following vote of the Council:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
COIJ'N~~:
COUNCrLMEIVlBERS:
COIJNC~ERS:
S~rAFFRPT~APPILdkL.CC~ klb ~
ATTAC~ NO. :2
CORRESPONDENCE
S'~rAF*FRFI~4APPHAL. CC2 lab 7
1989
el
TY
0
T[
CU
tA
June 23, 1992
Mr. Lance Garrett
First Fidelity Thrift & Loan Association
4370 La Jolla Village Drive, Suite 970
San Diego, CA 92122
Subject:
Planning Department and Building and Safety Department Comments on Appeal
No. 24, Plot Plan No. 8839, Revision No. 1, Amendment No. 2 (Building
located at 41910 Sixth Street)
This letter re-affirms the concerns of the Planning and Building and Safety Depaxtments relative
to the subject project as per our meeting on June 3, 1992.
Planning Department
The alley will need to be improved to City standards to provide access to the garage
spaces. Ramping will be necessary in order to permit autos to enter the garages due to
differential,~ in grade between the alley and the garages.
e
Rehting to Item No. 1, the garage spaces will need to be utiliT-e,d for parking only. If
you decide to u~lb,e the garage spaces for uses other than parking, then the parking
caleuhtions for the site will need to be reflective of this.
Staff has calcuhted the mount of office space that will be permitted on the second floor
to be 3,600 square feet based upon the forty (40) spaces which are provided on the site.
The fn'st floor will require 22 parking spaces (based upon the existing and proposed uses
enumerated on the site plan). This would leave eighteen {18) spaces available. Office
uses require one (1) parking space per 200 square feet of floor area. Eighteen (18)
spaces @ 200 square feet per space will permit 3600 square feet of office uses on the
second floor.
8~-%'TAFFRFl'~24APP-X.LTI
43174 ]~LLqNESS PAnK DI~IVE · TEMECULA. CAUFOI~NIA 9r2590 · PHONE (714) 694-1989 · FAX (714) 694-1999
Mr. Garr~tt
Appeal No. 24
Page 2
Building and Safety Department
The following is a listing of concerns regarding the subject prop~r~:
M-1 (garage) occupancies must be separated from B-2 occupancies as required in Table
No. 5-B of the Uniform Building Code.
Grade differentials along rear of building shall be modified to permit vehicular access to
garages if to be designated for vehicle parldng use.
Second floor modifications on south wing must be completed prior to approval for first
occupancy.
West wing exiting for proposed occupancies must be plan checked and approved prior
to issuance of building permit.
Compliance with structural engineers' recommendation must be completed prior to fn'st
occupancy of second floor.
'If you have any questions regarding this notification, please contact Matthew Fagan at (714) 694-
6400.
Sincerely,
Assistant Planner
Gary Thornhill
Director of Planning
vgw
cc: Tony Blmo, Chief Building Officer
S~TAPPRFI'~4APP-I.L~
Curtis R. Winters, Jr.
I~NDWEST GROUP
Post Office Box 456
Temecula, California
92593
Mr. David Dickson, City Manager
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California 92590
Dear Mr. Dickson:~
Ph: 714/699-3333
May 11, 1992
I can't find my letter to you of several months ago. However,
I objected at that time to the variance requested by the
owner(?) of 41920 Sixth Street.
That building, as I 'explained, was erected with a permit
allowing a one story building. Instead, he put up a two
story building. It was certified by the County of Riverside
for 3600 square feet of office or retail space. At that
time, I pointed out a number of facts about this building.
In addition to those already mentioned herein, I also covered
the problem of parking...27 spaces. They are asking for
a variance involving reduction for parking from 44 parking
areas to 40. There are still 27 spots only...including,
if you want to count the one given over to bicycle parking.
The situation can't change. They are stating that they
want to count the under cover places...which approximate
four rollup door areas. This not convenience parking which
is afforded by an open area. When we occupied Suite A,
there were times when we, in our office, had to park out
on the street. This was even true on some Sundays when
our customers(we are in the real estate business) couldn't
find a place to park.
The owner of that property will never cure this need unless
he acquires property to the immediate west or to the immediate
north...across the "alley."
In my last letter, I didn't cover another fact that you
[should be aware of...that, knowing the builder as I do,
the original owner, I doubt very much of the foundation
or the compaction meets the requirements of a two story
building.
I urge you to not grant a variance on this appeal. You
may be opening up a future suit if this building fails.
In fact, I was told ("flippantly?) that that building should
be torn down. It really is of terrible construction. A
visual inspection will tell you that.
Mr. Dickson
May 11, 1992
Page two
Are you aware that the building is again in foreclosure?
I don't see how the beneficiary can come out on this because,
In my opinion, the building isn't worth their claim for
dollars.
Sincerely yours, ~
Jr.
Curtis R. Winters,
Owner broker
LAND WEST GROUP
w/w
ITEM
17
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY .,b~
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
A GENDA REPORT
TO: City Council
FROM:
David F. Dixon
DATE:
July 14, 1992
SUBJECT: Annual Chamber of Commerce Agreement
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council authorize the Mayor to execute an agreement
between the City and the Chamber of Commerce.
STAFF REPORT:
During the past fiscal year, the Chamber of Commerce has served as a consultant to
the City and provided promotional activities. They have responded quickly to
correspondence regarding business, industry, and residential opportunities. They have
provided information to the media, outside interests, and others. Attached is a copy
of the proposed agreement which has been reviewed by Scott Field and found to be
acceptable. The agreement outlines the activities the Chamber of Commerce will
handle on behalf of the City. It also denotes the City will agree to pay the Chamber
$46,000 for their service during fiscal year 1992-1993. This is an increase of $1,000
over theprevious year's agreement. It is recommended that the City Council approve
the agreement between the City of Temecula and the Chamber of Commerce.
Additional information on their activities is available in the City Manager's office.
FINANCIAL IMPA C T:
Expenditure of $46,000 for Chamber of Commerce services during fiscal year 1992-
1993. Funding for this expenditure will come from Account//001 ol 00-999-5266.
CITY OF TEHECUL~
AGREEHENT
This Agreement, made in triplicate, .this day
of , 1992, by and between the CITY OF TEMECULA, a
Municipal Corporation, duly organized and existing under and by
virtue of the laws of the State of California, (hereinafter
referred to as "CITY"), and the TEMECULAVALLEY CHAMBER OF
COERCE, a California nonprofit corporation (hereinafter
referred to as "CHAMBER").
I. RECITALS
A. City is desirous of promoting its advantages as a
business, industrial, and residential center; disseminating
information relative thereto, and of properly following up and
giving consideration to inquiries made relative to the various
activities of City and its possibilities as such to residential,
industrial, and business interests.
B. Chamber has special knowledge, experience and
facilities for disseminating information; and is organized for
and equipped to carry on promotional activities on behalf of
City; and to publicize and exploit its advantages.
C. Such activities are recognized by law as being in the
public interest and serving a public purpose.
I I. AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between the parties as
follows:
A. Chamber shall undertake, during the 1992-1993 fiscal
year, to carry on promotional activities on behalf of City and to
particularly render the following services:
1. To maintain suitable quarters and employ competent
professional personnel to carry on the promotional activities
herein stated.
2. To promptly answer all correspondence relative to
the business, industrial, and residential advantages and
opportunities in the City of Temecula, and to disseminate
information by correspondence, newspaper publicity and personal
contacts favorably advertising such advantages and opportunities.
3. To prepare information for articles and news
stories, assist in gathering news items, descriptive of City's
resources; and to develop proper data whereby outside interests
and individuals may be induced to locate in Temecula.
CITY OF TEMECULA AGREEMENT PAGE 2
4. To aid in property value preservation and the
development and use of unoccupied and vacant properties.
5. To interview business and industrial executives
with the view of urging the establishment of'their business
activities in Temecula.
6. To promote and invite trade and business meetings
and celebrations whereby outside interests and individuals may
become acquainted with the advantages and opportunities in
Temecula.
7. To assist City in all ways possible in the
furtherance of the activities of the Redevelopment Agency of the
City of Temecula.
8. To maintain a public office within the business
area of City, easily accessible and fully equipped for the
purpose of disseminating information and answering correspondence
and inquiries regardin~ City. Said office shall be open to the
public not less than eight hours a day, except Saturdays,
Sundays, and holidays. Chamber shall employ a full time
Executive Director, a portion of whose duties shall be to promote
the welfare and activities of the City of Temecula; its
industries, business activities and opportunities, residential
advantages; and other matters of general public interest.
B. That in consideration of the services to be performed by
Chamber for City, as set forth in paragraph 1 hereof, City hereby
agrees to pay Chamber, during the term of this Agreement, the sum
of $4~,000 for the fiscal year 1992-1993, payable on execution of
this Agreement.
C. In the event City should desire any additional service,
Chamber shall, upon request of City, furnish an itemized
statement of the estimated cost thereof, and City may modify or
alter any such plan or proposal in any particular area or may
reject said plan in its entirety, or may direct the submission of
a new plan or proposal which may be accepted, altered or
rejected. Upon the final approval of any such plan and execution
thereof by Chamber, as herein provided, City will pay to Chamber
the cost thereof, which cost shall not exceed by more than
fifteen percent (15%) the estimated cost of such plan or proposal
unles~ with the express consent of City. All money due for
carrying .out said plan or proposal shall be supported by a
detailed statement of Chamber showing the basis of said claims,
and certified by proper officers of Chamber. Chamber shall not
be entitled to receive any compensation for its services or usual
expenses.
D. The Executive Director shall prepare and submit to the
City Manager or his designee a semi-annual written report
specifying the activities of Chamber during the preceding
semester. Said report shall be prepared in format acceptable to
City.
CITY OF TEMECULA AGREEMENT
Page 3
E. Chamber agrees that it will defend, indemnify and hold
City and its elected officials, officers, agents, and employees
free and harmless from all claims for damage to persons or
property by reason of Chamber's' acts or omissions or those of
Chamber's employees, officers, agents or invitees in connection
with their services rendered hereunder to the maximum extent
allowed by law.
F. Chamber shall secure from a good and responsible company
or companies doing insurance business in the State of California,
pay for and maintain in full force and effect for the duration of
this Agreement a policy of comprehensive automobile and workers'
compensation and employees' Liability Insurance in which the City
is the named insured or is named as an additional insured with
the Chamber and shall furnish a Certificate of Liability
Insurance to the City Manager before execution of this Agreement
by the City. Notwithstanding any inconsistent statement in the
policy or any subsequent endorsement attached thereto, the
protection offered by the policy shall;
1. Include the City as the insured or named as an
additional insured covering the services to be performed under
this Agreement against all claims arising out of, or in
connection with, the Agreement.
2. Include the City, its officers, employees and
agents while acting within the scope of their duties under this
Agreement against all claims arising out of, or in connection
with, the Agreement.
3. Provide the following minimum limits:
Ae
General Liability: $1,000,000. combined
single limit per occurrence for bodily
injury, personal injury and property damage.
Automobile Liability: $1,000,000. combined
single limit per accident for bodily injury'
and property damage.
Ce
Workers' Compensation and Employers
Liability: Workers' Compensation limits as
required by the Labor Code of the State of
California and Employers' Liability limits of
$1,000,000 per accident.
4. The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of
subrogation against the Agency, its officers, officials,
employees and volunteers for losses arising from work performed
by the Contractor for the Agency.
5. Bear an endorsement or shall have attached a rider
whereby it is provided that, in the event of expiration or
proposed cancellation of such policy for any reason whatsoever,
the City shall be notified by registered mail, postage prepaid,
return receipt requested, not less than thirty (30) days before
CITY OF TEMECULA page 4
G. Any deductibleor self-insured retention must be declared to a
approved by the City. At the option of the City, either the insurer sh
reduce or eliminate such deductible or self-insured retention as respec
the City, its officers, officials and employees; or the Chamber shall
procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigation
claim administration and defense expenses.
H. Should any litigation be commenced between the parties hereto
concerning the provision of this Agreement, the prevailing party in suc
litigation shall be entitled to reasonable attorney's fees, in addition
any other relief to which it may be entitled.
I. This Agreement shall be effective for the fiscal year
commencing July 1, 1992, and terminating June 30, 1993.
J. This Agreement may be terminated by either party upon thirty (
days written notice with any sums due and payable hereunder.
K. Chamber shall promptly furnish City, upon the completion of
Chamber's operating yea~, certified copies of annual operating statemen
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City has caused its corporate name and sea
to be hereunto subscribed and affixed by the Mayor and attested to by t
City Clerk, both thereunto duly authorized, and the Chamber has hereunt
subscribed this Contract the day, month and year hereinabove written.
CITY OF TEMECULA
ATTEST:
BY:
Patricia H. Birdsall
June S. Greek, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Scott F. Field, City Attorney
TEMECULA VALLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
ATTEST:
William Bopf, President
Leigh Engdahl, Executive Director
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
Dave Dixon, City Manager, City of Temecula
Leigh Engdahl, Executive Director, Chamber of Commerce
June 30,. 1992
Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce
Semi-annual Contract Report
January through June 1992
1. INFORMATION
AO
APPROXIMATELY 3,249 PEOPLE VISITED THE CHAMBER OFFICE.
APPROXIMATELY 1,100 PEOPLE VISITED THE VISITOR CENTER.
B. APPROXIMATELY 14,000 PHONE CALLS LOGGED:
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
3,597 CALLS FOR PHONE DIRECTORY
1,512 CALLS FOR RELOCATING PACKETS
370 CALI~FOR BUSINESS PACKETS
1,792 CALLS FOR TOURIST INFO
912 CALLS FOR RECREATIONAL INFO
223 CALLS FOR ORG./CALENDAR OF EVENTS
2,956 CALLS FOR STREET LOCATIONS
354 CALLS PERTAINED TO RESIDENTIAL/COMMERCIAL R.E.
2300 FOR SPECIAL EVENTS: BALOON/WINE & ROD RUN
*Note: These are strictly outside calls and do not
include any Chamber business, committee, or Board
business.
IN ORDER TO ANSWER AS MANY QUESTIONS AS POSSIBLE,
STATISTICAL INFORMATION, DIRECTORIES, FILES AND SURVEYS
ARE KEPT. MATERIALS AND ROSTERS ARE CONSTANTLY BEING
UPDATED·
TOURISM
IN PROCESS OF PRODUCING A COMMUNITY PICTORIAL. WILL
HIGHLIGHT THE QUALITY OF LIFE IN THE VALLEY, PROMOTE
TOURISM AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT.
SENT PRESS RELEASES AND STORIES TO TOURISM RELATED
PUBLICATIONS CONCERNING EVENTS AND ATTRACTIONS IN THE
TEMECULA VALLEY. NOTE: WE WERE FEATURED ON CHANNEL 9
K-CAL'S NEW HOME SHOW IN APRIL 1992 AS A RESULT OF OUR
EFFORTS·
ASSISTED BOTH THE ROD RUN EVENT IN FEBRUARY AND THE
BALLOON & WINE FESTIVAL IN MAY WITH VOLUNTEERS,
STAFFING AND SERVICES.
Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce
Contract Report - June 1992
Page 2
A TOURIST GUIDE PROJECT HAS BEEN APPROVED AND WILL BE
IMPL~-~NTED LATER THIS YEAR.
MOVING THE SATELLITE VISITORS AND TOURIST CENTER IN THE
WITH THE MUSUEAM TO ACCOMMODATE VISITORS AND TOURISTS
AND ASSIST THE MUSEAUM WITH STAFFING AND EXPENSES.
TOURISM COMMITTEE MEETS TWICE PER MONTH AND ARE WORKING
ON A PROGRAM TO BRING 5TH STUDENTS FROM OTHER AREASS TO
THE VALLEY ON A FIELD TRIP TO LEARN OUR HISTORY AND
BRING INFORMATION BACK HOME TO THEIR PARENTS.
INDUSTRIAL & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
A. APPROXIMATELY 210 STATISTICAL PACKETS MAILED TO
DEVELOPERS, MANUFACTURERS, BUSINESSES INTERESTED IN
RELOCATING TO'TEMECULAAND TO HEAL ESTATE BROKERS AND
AGENTS·
LOCAL BUSINESS PROMOTIONS
"SHOP TEMECULA FIRST" PROJECT ENCOURAGES CONSUMERS TO
KEEP THEIR SHOPPING DOLLARS IN TEMECULA. CURRENTLY
WE ARE INITIATING A NEW PROJECT INVOLVING THE MAJOR
RETAILERS (K-MART, COSTCO) IN A "WHERE YOUR TAX MONIES
GO" PROGRAM.
CHAMBER AMBASSADORS AND STAFF ORGANIZED AND PUBLICIZED
APPROXIMATELY 90 RIBBON CUTTING CEREMONIES WELCOMING
NEW BUSINESSES TO TEMECULA.
CHAMBER PROVIDED 6 MIXERS, 6 EDUCATIONAL BREAKFASTS, A
BUSINESS LUNCHEON, AND HELD 2 BUSINESS SHOWCASES.
5. CIVIC & DEVELOPMENTAL AFFAIRS
SPONSORED A CANDIDATES FORUM FOR COUNTY SUPERVISOR
CANDIDATES IN MAY 1992.
Be
IN THE PROCESS OF ORGANIZING A RECYCLING SYMPOSIUM WITH
MAJOR RECYCLERS IN THE CITY AS SPEAKERS. ADDITIONALLY,
WE WILL HAVE EXHIBITORS DISPLAYING RECYCLED PRODUCTS.
DURING THE PAST 6 MONTHS, 140 BUSINESS MEETINGS WERE HELD WITH
OVER 400 MEMBERS PARTICIPATING. SINCE IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO
DOCUMENT ALL THE CHAMBER'S ACTIVITIES, THE ABOVE IS AS EXACT AS
POSSIBLE FROM RECORDS KEPT INTERNALLY.
ITEM NO.
18
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER ~
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
A GENDA REPORT
City Council
David F. Dixon
July 14, 1992
City Manager's Blue Ribbon Committee
RECOMMENDATiON:
It is recommended that the City Council publicly extend its appreciation for the
support of the Blue Ribbon Committee members for working with the City Manager
in reviewing developmental services in the City of Temecula.
STAFF REPORT:
In January 1992 I established a special six member Blue Ribbon Committee to
review developmental services. The review was timely as the City had been
incorporated just two years. The first committee meeting was held in March
1992. At that time, the purpose and intent of the committee was explained and a
facilitator was introduced to the committee. non Smith, a professional in public
administration, was asked to serve as the facilitator and coordinate the activities of
the committee. A final report was submitted to the City Manager on May 8, 1992
and has been reviewed and implementation has begun. A copy of the final report
is attached.
It is recommended that the City Council acknowledge the fine work of the
committee and extend their appreciation for the hours of dedicated public service
that have been provided by committee members Bill Bopf, Larry Markam, Dave
Olson, Max Gilliss, Tom Griffin, and Tom Langley.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None
City Manager's
Blue Ribbon Committee
F'mal Report on
Development Services Review
City of Temecula
May 18, 1992
City Manager's
Blue Ribbon Committee
on
Development Efficiency Review
of
Development Services
Membership
Bill Bopf, Chair
Larry Markham
Dave Olson
Max Gilliss
Tom Griffin
Tom Langley
Table of Contents
Development Efficiency Committee Membership ................. ii
Background of Blue Ribbon Committee
for Development Services Review
(Development Efficiency) - City of Temecula ................... 1
Findings and RecQmmendations .......................... 2
180 Day Implementation Schedule .......................... 8
I. Background of Blue Ribbon Committee for Development Services Review
In January, 1992 the City Manager established a special six member blue ribbon
committee to review the services supplied by the development departments of the City of
Temecula. This review was to entail strengths and weaknesses and suggest methods for
improving the quality of service. The Committee was to be short-lived and file a report with
the City Manager in six weeks. A consultant was brought forth to assist the Committee and
provide support independent from existing city staff.
The first meeting of the Committee was held on March 19, 1992 with the City Manager
explaining the purpose and intent of the committee. At this meeting the consultant discussed
Total Quality Management (TQM) and operational assessment methods of organizations.
A second meeting was held on March 27, 1992 where the directors of the three
development services departments (Planning, Public Works and BuDding and Safety) were to
present an overview of the operations of each department and explain how a development
application is processed. Given the extensiveness of the information, an additional meeting was
scheduled for April 2, 1992 to complete the review by the directors. The committee members
discussed with each department director plans for future operations and the functions of each
department. It was requested that-a "Mission Statement" be developed for the committee.
The fourth meeting was held on April 13, 1992 and the following "Mission Statement"
'Mission Statement:
To assist the City of Temecula Development Services Departments (Engineering,
Planning and BuiMing and Safety), in reviewing current procedures and
processing methods, to ensure the highest level of quality client service in the
most effective and efficient manner. '
The committee further discussed observations of various clients and developers
conducting business in the City. It was agreed that additional training of city staff is needed and
observations of some development community members and committee members was referred
to the committee consultant for evaluation. It was determined that an implementation program
was needed and the committee should monitor this. A fifth meeting was held on April 30, 1992
to review the initial findings and implementation program, and a sixth meeting on May 12, 1992
to discuss the findings and recommendations with the operating department's director's, prior
to submission to the City Manager. At the May 12, 1992 meeting it was agreed to submit the
report to the City Manager for action and/or discussion with the Committee, after minor changes
were made, based on the input by the operating departments. The final report was subsequently
submitted on May 18, 1992.
II. Findings and Recommendations
The findings of the committee are catcgorizcd into four major components and specific
actions are recommended for each.
1)
3)
Policy. Standards and Guidelines
Finding:
A need exists to clearly define development guidelines and standards that
can then be supplied to developers (clients) with certainty that if complied
with permits and entitlement, will be forthcoming without delay or
redesign requests.
Recommendation: Develop comprehensive guidelines and standards for
development proposals to include, but not be limited to, design, site
planning (landscaping, parking lots, etc.), engineering and required
submittal documents.
Finding:
A new method of initially receiving applications is needed to avoid time
delays and-requests for additional information after an application is
submitted to "the City".
Recommendation: A "clear and concise" checklist is to be developed
for what is required to be submitted with the various types of applications.
This checklist is to be reviewed with an applicant (client) prior to actual
submittal to the operating department, if the applicant desires. This
evaluation is to be fee recoverable and serve as a preliminary review
process with written comments provided by the City. Any deficiencies are
to be "spelled out" at the pre-submittal meeting and in the written
comments, and only legally mandated requests for additional information
are to be made after the preliminary review process is complete.
Finding:
A review of the items requiring full public hearings before Planning
Commission and City Council is to be undertaken with the intent of
reducing the number of items requiring public hearings, where standards
are previously established.
Recommendation: Amend ordinances to reduce public hearing
requirements where and when standards are established.
Finding:
The first General Plan is emerging from development and is soon to be
enacted.
Recommendation: Ensure expeditious enactment of the first General
Plan.
5) Finding:
6) Finding:
7) Finding:
8) Finding:
9) Finding:
Many of the current ordinances have been carried over from when the
City was in the unincorporated County of Riverside area and do not reflect
the emerging image or practices of the City.
Recommendation: Enact ordinances, particularly zoning, that reflects
the current development trends and quality image of the City of Temecula.
These are to include innovative and cost effective concepts such as density
transfer, development incentives and environmental balance.
Since incorporation the need has existed for usage of consultants to
provide what is generally a City staff function. This has gradually been
reduced as professional City staff have been employed.
Recommendation: Usage of consultants is to be internalized to the City
to assist staff and not become an extension of City services in a remote
location. This recommendation is considered the highest priority of the
Committee and needs immediate action and it is necessary that a cadre of
core City staff be provided to enable fulfillment of this.
The employees of the City provide tremendous service to residents,
businesses and development interests.
Recommendation: Develop an employee recognition program either
monthly or quarterly combined with selection of "employee of the year."
Coordination on development related items with governmental agencies outside
the City of Temecula
Governmental agencies outside the City of Temecula have often taken
extensive periods of time to respond or comment on pending City
development applications, for private and public projects.
Recommendation: Develop streamlined procedures and processes with
all outside reviewing agencies that includes time lines for review and
schedules that are integrated with the City reviewing process. Assist the
outside agencies by offering space in City Hall to conduct such reviews
and create a "city proactive" effort that ensures expeditious processing.
This may entail, on acceptable projects, that city staff advocate and
intercede with reviewing agencies to assist in getting the project through
the process.
Comprehensive Training
The establishment of the City has led to new personnel becoming involved
with providing services to residents and businesses. The new individuals
had to "create" new localized procedures, assist the City Council,
Planning Commission and other City boards, all while maintaining daily
10)
11)
12)
FindinF:
Finding,:
Finding:
operations of a growing city. This endeavor was done within budget and
in less than a two year time frame. While creation of the administrative
framework for the City of Temecula can now be considered successful,
it becomes of paramount importance that continued professional and
managerial attributes of staff and executive management be enhanced.
Recommendation: A) 'Develop a forrealized ongoing training program
for all staff that entails a series of.monthly sessions to include such items
as customer relationship, client coordination, team building, reporting
systems, role playing and cross training between City departments. Create
in all employee performance reports a mandated section for training and
training requirements that must be met during a review period.
B) Customer service training is to have clear measurable goals with
specific completion dates and oriented to how effectively the customer can
be serviced.
C) Establish a specialized "custom made" management training program
for all executive management personnel to entail management reporting
systems, goal setting, motivation, techniques on developing interpersonal
skills and situation assessment from a client's or user's perspective.
A major effort is needed to ensure an employee development and training
program is fully effectuated that includes preparing for continued growth
of the City's greatest asset "its employees".
Recommendation: A special budget item is needed that includes a
forrealized employee development program for items such as employee
relations, public relations and ongoing personal and professional growth
of employees of the City of Temecula.
Development Services Operatin{ Departments
The draft-job descriptions for the various departments of development
services do not prioritize the skills needed nor rank those that are most
desirable such as interpersonal. In the various position descriptions, little
difference exists between a supervisor and executive manager.
Recommendation: Revise the draft job descriptions to prioritize
desirable skills based on actual need, define executive management
function for each department head position and stress interpersonal skills.
· The job descriptions need to reflect heavily on customer service skills.
The initial Capital Improvement Program (CIP) was a commendable effort
by the city staff. The document provided generalized estimates of future
project costs, funding sources and potential timing beyond the immediate
future°
4
Recommendation: Continue the ongoing process of the Capital
Improvement Program and increase the level of detail and project
specificity within the document. This program is a dynamic evolving
process and needs a higher level of detail and constant management.
Increasing project detail and having "preliminary designs" completed in
advance for future projects will accelerate the City's capability to
immediately apply for and receive funding from County, State and Federal
agencies upon notice that the funds are available.
Finding:
The City of Temecula will continue to grow and change and a need exists
to fully manage all assets of the City from parks to roadway paving
(sealant and slum/) and drainage systems.
Recommendation: Establish an "asset management" program that
includes not only an inventory but evaluates annually the actual conditions
and status of all assets and includes such items as cost, probable
replacement time frame and needed maintenance.
14)
Finding:
The ongoing efforts to computerize City Hall by networking is
commendable, although a fully integrated system is necessary that has the
operational understanding of each involved department oriented to
outstanding customer service that is reinforced by the development review
process itself.
Recommendation: A) Ensure that a "fully integrated" computer system
that recognizes one development review process for the entire city is
jointly enacted and is not independent to any one department and that the
client is effectively serviced throughout the development review process.
B) The integrated computer system, while maintaining a sound customer
service orientation for the development review process, also needs to have
design consideration for monitoring the Capital Improvement Program
(CIP), Traffic Management and other programs of a citywide nature.
Finding:
When an application for development review or a permit request is
processed only a limited "Management Information System" exists. No
processing status report nor projected scheduling itinerary is available to
the applicant (client), City departments or staff members.
Recommendation: Develop a "Management Information System" from
the point of intake of an application or request for permit that establishes
a schedule, tracking of actual review, ongoing moniwring status and
critical dates to ensure meeting deadlines (development calendar). Design
of the system is to provide feedback to the applicant (client) coupled with
full explanations of needed information.
5
16)
17)
Finding:
FindinE':
Hndin~:
FindinE,:
An applicant or customer feedback (critique) method has been enacted on
a limited basis and is not present throughout all development services
departments.
Recommendation: Develop a comprehensive "client feedback system"
that encourages all types of comments on how the development review
process is viewed. Design forms and the system to encourage comments
and ensure full evaluation and action on suggestions or observations made
and even review by the Temecula Coordinating Committee to ensure
communication and feedback is occurring.
The City has taken efforts to establish a "user (client) friendly"
atmosphere among the staff serving the public. This is highly
commendable and deserving of special note.
Recommendation: Continue this "How can I help you" attitude by city
staff when serving the public including individuals who are called to the
counter only occasionally.
When a development application is being processed a method is needed
that allows for explanations and status reports to be given by a variety of
staff members to avoid an applicant (client) being told, "wait till the
assigned person gets back to obtain that information."
Recommendation: Consider having a variety of staff members (or uniO
conceptually familiar with all pending applications and potentially design
case files with "real time status" using computer networking thus allowing
back-up personnel to intervene and solve the issue, ensuring outstanding
customer seri, ice.
The public in general and individuals working with city staff on a limited'
basis need greater assistance in understanding the development review
process and special care needs to be taken in how information is
conveyed. A developer handbook is under preparation by the Planning
Department.
Recommendation: A) Establish a program whereby a series of public
information pamphlets and brochures, combined with new application
forms, are created over a three month period. Each is to explain various
types of applications or permits in a "simple" and conversational manner
with illustrations and step by step analysis.
B) The developer handbook completion coupled with widespread
community distribution is needed. A section of this handbook is to be
devoted to direct phone numbers (hot lines) to allow inquiring about
specific problems that arise and who to contact, including agencies that
are outside the city jurisdiction.
6
20)
21)
Finding:
Findin[:
In some instances applicants and developers are placed in costly situations
for unknown reasons. For example, in subdivisions the new lawn must
be watered by hand, since the final utility clearance has not been obtained
and the water meter to the individual home turned on. The process for
establishing a model home complex is burdensome and entails bonds
combined with a temporary use permit requiting extensive items to be
submitted.
Recommendation: Review the process for utility clearances in general
and model home permits specifically. A review of the cost impacts to the
client ought to be considered when compliance assurances are already in
place and the new process needs to be practical and sympathetic.
New businesses in the City are welcomed by everyone and special
consideration is necessary to ensure 'grand opening' dates are met. Most
new businesses require city permits for some types of items such as
electrical wiring, plumbing and signing. These are generally called tenant
improvements Crl's). If a new business person has difficulty with the
City in what is already a stressing situation of opening a business, then the
"resentment~'- is fostered for years to come and is directed at "the City."
Recommendation: A streamlined tenant improvement process is
necessary that crosses between various reviewing departments of the City
and can be handled "over-the-counter," with each depaxtrnent's
requirements previously documented for various types of businesses. It
is desirous that the goal be to see how quicldy the permit can be issued to
ensure outstanding customer service and reflect an attitude that
demonstrates "We're on your side". The frustration felt by the user
(predominantly new local businesses) is to be eliminated.
7
III. 180 Day Implementation Schedule
The Committee has recommended a series of twenty-one recommendations, some of
which will require at least a year or two to be fully implemented. In reviewing the
recommendations, the Committee would like to propose a 180 day implementation schedule,
during which time periodic (every 45-60 days) progress meetings would be held by the City
Manager with input by the Temecula Coordinating Committee on the progress of
implementation. The make-up and function of the Committee to achieve this needs review.
It is proposed to divide the 180 day schedule into two phases, the first of 60 days would
be to allow the operating departments to develop an "efficiency improvement program"
indicating how the recommendations will be implemented. The second phase of 120 days would
be the actual implementation process.
The actual implementation monitoring ought to occur independent from the operating
departments by the City Manager's Office. The assigned individual for implementation should
report to the City Manager directly on implementation progress.
To assist in the implementation the attached schedule has been prepared which assumes
a July 1, 1992 start date and completion by the end of 1992.
8
ITEM NO.
19
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
PREPARED BY:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
Ad Hoc Committee Councilmembers Mu~oz and Parks
July 14, 1992
Planning Commission Appointments
City Clerk June Greek
RECOMMENDATION: Reappoint Commissioners Billie Blair and Steven Ford to the
Planning Commission for four year terms' effective June 4, 1992.
BACKGROUND: Pursuant to the City Council's adopted policy regarding
commission appointments and reappointments, the City Clerk notified the public via
advertisements of the expiration of the terms of Commissioners Blair and Ford as of
June 4, 1992. Seven applications were received and reviewed by the Ad Hoc
Committee, including the applications for reappointment from the incumbent
Commissioners. After careful review and consideration it is the recommendation of
the Ad Hoc Committee to reappoint Commissioners Billie G. Blair and Steven J. Ford
to four year terms of office.
ITEM
20
TOi
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL:
CITY ATTORNEY ~
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager .
Anthony Elmo, Chief Building Official
July 14, 1992
License Agreement with Temeka Advertising for Installation of
Directional "Kiosk" Signs Within The City Right Of Way
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council approve an award of and authorize the City
Manager to execute a License Agreement to Temeka Advertising, 43339 Business
Park Drive, #102, Temecula, California 92590, for the installation of the City's
"Kiosk" signs.
BACKGROUND:
On October 22, 1992, the City Council adopted Ordinance 91-40 with direction to
staff to develop a directional "Kiosk" Sign Program to provide an effective uniform
method of directing attention to development projects. A Kiosk, by definition, is a
free standing, multiple sided structure whose main purpose is to display signs or
information which in this case will be for the purpose of directing traffic to new
residential developments and City and public facilities.
Because the scope of this sign program involves the administration, marketing and
installation of these signs, staff felt it was in the best interest of the City to solicit
Requests For Qualifications from firms with this specific type of program experience.
The City received a complaint from a local sign company, Fast Signs, as a result of
not receiving an opportunity to bid on administering the kiosk program. Fast Signs
had filed with the City a pre-bidders qualifications letter but did not list any experience
operating a kiosk directional sign program. Therefore, staff felt that given the overall
scope of the project, it was in the best interest of the City to limit sending out the
AGENDA REPORT
July 14, 1992
Page 2
RFQ's to only those firms who have experience doing this type of work. Based on the
selection process, Temeka Advertising was recommended to the City Council on May
26,. 1992.
At the City Council meeting of May 26, 1992, Motivational Systems, Inc. objected
to the award of the license to Temeka Advertising. Motivational Systems raised four
specific objections: (1) that the bidders were not informed the City would only select
a local firm; (2) that Temeka is not a licensed sign contractor; (3) that there is no
provision in the License Agreement for Temeka to sell signs at a reduced price, bulk
basis to other sign companies, who can then sell the signs to their individual clients;
and (4) that the Harris Bill prohibits this type of license agreement.
DISCUSSION:
RFQ's were distributed to approximately nineteen (19) firms as step one of the
selection process. A committee made up of City Council and staff members was
formed to review the qualifications of each responding firm and select the four (4)
most qualified firms. The four (4) firms were then asked to prepare a presentation
before the committee with the top ranked firm being asked to submit a cost proposal.
The top four (4) firms were selected as follows:
Motivational Systems, Inc.
Temeka Advertising
Temecula Homebuilders Association
The Imagination Group
After observing the presentations of each of the top four (4) firms,-the committee
chose Temeka Advertising to request a cost proposal from and enter into license
negotiations with.
Temeka Advertising then prepared several renderings of kiosk designs for the
committee's consideration. Once a design was chosen, the design and information
about the program was presented to the local builders association for their input.
Taking into consideration that input, the committee has reached an agreement with
Temeka Advertising for a four (4) year period, in which Temeka will be licensed to
install and maintain the kiosk signs along with performing the abatement of illegally
placed directional signs on weekends.
Temeka will provide a maximum of two (2) sign slats per kiosk for indicating direction
to various City facilities. The lease cost for each slat on the kiosk will be a minimum
of $62.66 for a single face sign and $86.53 for a double face sign per month during
AGENDA REPORT
July 14, 1992
Page 3
the first year of the four (4) year agreement. This includes 2% which will be remitted
to the City of Temecula for administrative expenses. The annual anticipated revenue
for. administrative efforts is a maximum of 97308.00 respectively. This constitutes
repayment for expenses incurred during the RFQ selection process and ongoing
monitoring of the program by City staff. A one-time construction cost up to a
maximum ~185 will be charged each lessee per leased sign. A review of cost and
level of participation will be conducted annually each of the remaining years of the
agreement in an effort to regulate any annual lease cost increases.
The first issue Motivational raised was what criteria were used to judge the bidders.
The Committee's decision was based upon the firm's RFQ and presentation to the
Committee. The decision had nothing to do with choosing a local company, despite
Motivational Systems' claims otherwise.
The second issue is whether Temeka was required to have a sign contractor's license.
As the attached letter from the City Attorney (dated February 3, 1992) states, a
contractor's license is not necessary because the agreement merely authorizes
Temeka to use the City right-of-way for kiosks. Temeka is not constructing the signs
for the City. Rather, Temeka will own all kiosk signs. Temeka will use a licensed
contractor to install the signs.
The third issue concerns the Harris Act. The attached letter from the City Attorney
(dated June 24, 1992) states clearly that the Harris Act is inapplicable to signs in the
public right-of-way.
The last issue concerns bulk sales. Prior to presentation of this License Agreement
to the City Council, staff spent many hours negotiating an agreement which reflects
the lowest cost to the City's development community for their participation in this
directional sign program.
Staff's research and statements by a Motivational Systems' representative revealed
that discounts to competing sign firms are normally not a license agreement item, but
items that are generally unwritten policy offered upon negotiation between firms.
v:%wp~agend a.rep\ooom0714.Temeka
VENTURA COUNTY OFFICE
:'310 PONDEROSA DRIVE
SUITE I
CAMARILL0, CALIFORNIA e3Oto
(80S) gS7-348S
TrLECOPIER; {80S) 48a-gS34
LAW OlrlrlClr.S
SUITr 640
COSTA Mrc-A, CALIIrOIRNIA 92626
(714) E45-5559
FACSIMILE (:714) 755-S648
JUN 2 6 1992
1.0S ANGELES OFFICE
6ll WEST SIXTH STREET. SUITE 2500
LOS ANGrLrS. CALIFORNIA 9C, C)~7
(213) 236-0600
TELECODIER: (213) 236-2100
June 24, 1992
Mr. Tony Elmo
Director, Building & Safety
CITY OF TEMECULA
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
Re: KIOSK PROGRAM AND HARRIS BILL
Dear Tony:
Last month, during Council review of the proposed Kiosk Sign
Agreement, Motivational Systems, Inc. suggested that'the program
might violate the Harris Bill. It is our conclusion that the
Harris Bill does not apply to the Kiosk Agreement. ~
The Harris Bill was adopted in 1990, and now appears at
Section 713 of the Civil Code. A copy of its provisions is
attached.
Briefly, Section 713 preempts the City from prohibiting on-
site "for sale" signs. Consequently, a homeowner may place on
his property a sign advertising that the property is for sale,
lease or exchange. However, the City retains the power to
regulate the location, dimensions and design of the sign.
What must be emphasized is that Section 713 has nothing to
do with directional signs located in the public right-of-way.
Specifically, Section 713 states:
"Nothing in this section limits any authority
which a person or local governmental entity
may have to limit or regulate the display or
placement of a sign on a private or public
right-of-way.,,
The Kiosk Sign Agreement relates to location of directional
signs located within the public right-of-way. Consequently,
Section 713 has nothing at all to do with these signs, and the
Tony Elmo, Building & Safety
CITY OF TEMECULA
June 24, 1992
Page 2
City retains the right to either license the location of such
signs, or to prohibit them entirely.
Please feel free to call me if you have any questions or I
may be of further assistance.
Sincerely,
Scott F. Field
City Attorney
CITY OF TEMECULA
Enclosure
VENTURA COUNTY 0WFICE
23|0 PONDEROSA DRIVE
SUITE I
CAIdAIqlLLD, CALIIr0RNIA g3010
(805} e87-3468
TELEDORIER: (SOS) 482o~834
LAW GIrltIC:ItS
31OO BI=tlS"t'OI, SYREE'T
C:OSTA MESA, CAI.,IIrC)FtNIA g26s, 6
(714) e.4S-SSS9
February 3, 1992
I, OS ANGELES OWlrICE
ONE WILSNIRE BUILDING
624 SOUTH GRAND AVrNUIr, Ii?N F'I, OOFI'
LOS ANGrLES, CALIF'0RNIA SOOl7
(2~3) 235-OSOO
TELECOP~ER: (a~3) 236-27oo
Nr. Tony Elmo
Building Official
CITY OF TEMECULA
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
Re:
Dear Tony:
Kiosk Program
On January 31, 1991, I spoke with Dale Stewart of the
Contractor's License Board. We discussed the kiosk sign program.
I explained to him that the City would be licensing one company
to install the kiosk signs. This company would pay the City for
the right to occupy the public right-of-way by way of a share of
the marketing revenues from the directional signs. The signs
themselves would be owned by the licensee. Given this
arrangement, Mr. Stewart confirmed that it is not necessary for
the licensee to hold a contractor,s license, but only that the
licensee employ a C-61 contractor to install the kiosk.
Accordingly, please be sure that the contract reflects this
arrangement, including the fact that the licensee will own the
kiosk and will either remove the kiosk at the end of the contract
or abandon it in place.
Please note that if we were hiring the company to install
the kiosk on behalf of the City with the City owning the kiosk,
then the contractor would be required have a C-61 license.
Please feel free to call me if you should have any
questions.
Sincerely,
Scott F. Field
City Attorney
CITY OF TEMECULA
Grant Yates
~110733~3.L~
THIS License, made and entered into this 26th day of May , 19 92, between the
City of Temecula, a municipal corporation ("OWNER"), and Temeka Advertising,
("USER").
The parties hemto mutually agree as follows:
GRANT OF LICENSE. Pursuant to City of Temecuh Ordinance No. 91-40,
Owner grants to User an exclusive License to locate kiosk directional signs
within the public right-of-way. Each site for a sign shall be appwved by the
City Building Official, the Planning Director and the City Engineer. User
shall install, construct and maintain kiosk signs within the public right-of-way
pursuant to the terms and conditions as set forth in Exhibit A attached.
USE PERMITS. This License is not in lieu of obtaining an encroachment
permit. User agrees to procure all permits and licenses requested by the City
of Temecula to construct and install kiosk signs and to comply with
governmental rules, regulations, statues and ordinances. The User shall
obtain all necessary permits and licenses, including but not limited to Building
Permits, Encroachment Permits, and City Business License.
POSSESSORY INTERESTS. The provisions of this License Agreement may
give rise to the creation of a possessory interest in City of Temecula owned
tax exempt land or improvements. If such a possessory interest is created by
this Franchise License, it may be subject to property taxation pursuant to
Cnlifornia Revenue and Taxation Code Section 107 el seq., and as a result,
User may be subject to the payment of a any property taxes levied on such
interest. This notice is given pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code Section
107.6
PERFORMANCE. Consultant shall at all times, faithfully, industrially and to
the best of his ability, experience and talent, perform all tasks described
her.in.
PAYMENT. As compensation to Owner for grant of this License, User shall
pay Owner two percent (2 % ) of the gross receipts derived from the leasing of
space on each kiosk sign.
SUSPENSION. TERMINATION OR ABANDONM~NT OF LICENSE. Any
time after May 26, 1994, the City may terminate this License, or any portion
hereof, by serving upon the User at least six (6) months prior written notice.
BRF_~CH OF LICENSE. In the event that User is in default for cause under
the terms of this License, the City shall have no obligation or duty to continue
contracting with User for any work performed after the date of default.
Default shall include not performing the tasks described herein to the
reasonable satisfaction of the City Manager of the City. Failure by the User
to make progress in the performance of work hereunder, if such failure arises
out of causes beyond his control, and without fault or negligence of the User,
shall not be considered a default.
If the City Manager or his delegate determines that the User defaults in the
performance of any of the terms or conditions of this License, it shall serve
the User with written notice of the default. The User shall have twenty (20)
days after service upon it of said notice in which to cure the default by
rendering a satisfactory pe~ormance. In the event that the User fails to cure
its default within such period of time, the City shall have the right,
notwithstanding any other provision of this License, to terminate this License
without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it
may be entitled at law, in equity or under this License.
TERM. This License shall commence on May 26,1992, and shall remain
and continue in effect until tasks described heroin are completed, but in no
event later than May 26,19 96.
Any disputes regarding performance, default or other matters in dispute
between the City and the User arising out of this License or breech thereof,
shall be resolved by. arbitration. The arbitrator's decision shall be final.
User shall select an arbitrator from a list provided by the City of three retired
judges of the Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services, Inc. The arbitration
hearing shall be conducted according to California Code of Civil Procedure
Section 1280, et $eq. City and User shall share the cost of the arbitration
equally.
REMOVAL AND ABANDOn. In the event that the License is
terminated or nonrenewed, then such User shall, upon demand of Owner, and
at the sole expense of the User, promptly remove or, in its discretion,
abandon in phce, all or any portion of the kiosk signs. Upon abandonment of
the kiosk signs in phce, User shall cause to be executed, acknowledged and
delivered to Owner, such instruments as the City Attorney shall prescribe and
appwve, transferring and conveying the ownership of the kiosk signs to the
Owner.
In removing its kiosk signs, User shall refill, at its own expense, any
V:~WI~CONTRACT~.RBV
2
10.
11.
12.
13.
excavation it made and leave all public rights-of-way in as good condition as
that prevailing prior to the User's removal of its kiosk signs.
In the event the License is not renewed or is terminated, the Owner and the
User may agree that User maintain and operate its kiosk signs until a
subsequent User is selected and a subsequent or modified license becomes
effective.
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in this License, User may
not abandon any of its kiosk signs in place if they materially interfere with the
use of the public right-of-way in which such kiosk signs axe located or with
the use thereof of any public utility, which material interference shall be
reasonably determined by the City Engineer.
INDEPENDENT USER. The User is and shall at all times remain as to the
City a wholly independent contractor. Neither the City nor any of its officers,
employees or agents shall have control over the conduct of the User or any of
the User's officers, employees or agents, except as herein set forth. The User
'shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers,
employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the
City.
L~OAL RESPONSIBRXHES. The User shall keep itself informed of State
and Federal laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed
by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this
License. The User shall at all times observe and comply with all such laws
and regulations. The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable
at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the User to comply with this
section.
NOTICE. Whenever it shall be necessary for either party to serve notice on
the other respecting this License, such notice shall be served by certified mail,
postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the City Manager of
the City of Temecula, located at 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula,
California 92590 and the User at 43339 Business Park Drive. #102.
Temecula. California 92590 unless and until different addresses may be
furnished in writing by either party to the other. Notice shah be deemed to
have been served seventy-two (72) hours after the same has been deposited in
the United States Postal Services. This shall be valid and sufficient service of
notice for all purposes.
ASSIGNMENT. The User shall not assign the performance of this License,
nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without the prior written
V:XWPXCONTRACT~I.REV
14.
consent of the City.
LIABRIIY INSURANCE. The User shall maintain insurance acceptable to
the City in full force an effect throughout the term of this contract, against
claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or
in connection with the performance of the work hemunder by the User, his
agents, representatives, employees or subcontractors. Insurance is to be
placed with insurer with a Bests' rating of no less than A:VII. The User shall
provide the following scope and limits of insurance:
Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
Insurance Services Office form Number GL 0002 (Ed. 1/73) coveting
Comprehensive General Liability and Insurance Services Office form
number GL 0404 covering Broad Form Comprehensive General
Liability; or Insurance Services Office Commercial General Umbility
coverage ("occurrence" form CG 0001).
Insurance Services Office form no. CA 0001 (Ed. 1/78) coveting
Automobile Liability, code 1 "any auto" and endorsement CA 0025.
Workers' Compensation insurance as required by Labor Code of the
State of California an Employers' Liability insumce.
Minimum Limits of Insurance. User shall maintain limits of insurance no less
than:
General Liability $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for
bodily injury and property damage.
AuWmobile Lhbility: $1,000,000 combined single limit per accident
for bodily injury and property damage.
®
Workers' Compensation and Employer's Lhbility: Workers'
compensation as required by the Labor Code of the State of California
and Employers Liability limits of $1,000,000 per accident.
Deductibles and Serf-Insured Retentions. Any deductible in excess of $1,000
must be declared to and appwved by the City.
Other Insurance Provisions. Insurance policies required by this contract shall
contain or be endorsed to contain the foBowing pwvisions:
4
VfiWI~CONTRAC'BTIiMI~tA.RI!V
All Policies. Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be
endorsed to state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided,
canceled by either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after
thirty (30) days' prior written notice to the City via United States First
Class Mail.
General Liability and Automobile Liability coverage. The City of
Temecula, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be
covered as insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities
performed by or on behalf of the User; products and completed
operations of the User; premises owned, occupied or used by the User,
or automobiles owned, lease, hired or borrowed by the User. The
coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection
afforded to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers.
With regard to claims arising from the User's performance of the work
described in this contract, the User's insurance coverage shall be
primary insurance as respects the City of Temecula, its officers,
officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or serf-insurance
maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers
shall apply in excess of, and not contribute with, the User's insurance.
Any failure to comply with the reporting provisions of the policies
shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its officers officials,
employees or volunteers.
The User's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against
whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the
limits of the insurer's liability.
Worker's Compensation and Employers Liability Coveme. The
insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against the City of
Temecula, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers for losses
arising from work performed by the User for the City.
Verification of Coverage. User shall furnish the City with certificates
of insurance effecting coverage required by this clause. The
certificates for each insurance policy are to be signed by a person
authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The
certificates are to be on forms provided by the City and are to be
received and approved by the City before work commences. The City
reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required
insurance policies, at any time.
5
V:\WI~CONTRACTXT~.REV
User shall include all subconsultants as insureds under its policies or
shall furnish separate certificates for each subcontractor. All coverage,
for subcontractors shall be subject to all of the requirements stated
herein.
Any deductibles or serf-insured retentions must be declared to and
approved by the City. At the option of the City, either: the insurer
shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or serf insured retentions as
respects the City, its officers, officials and employees; or the User
shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related
investigations, claim administration and defense expenses.
15.
INDEMNIFICATION. The User agrees to indemnify and save harmless the
City of Temecuh, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and
against any and all chims, demands, losses, defense cost, or liability of any
kind or nature which the City, its officers, agents and employees may sustain
or incur or wMch may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of
persons, or damage to property arising out of User's negligent performance
under the terms of this License, excepting only liability arising out of the sole
negligence of the City.
16.
ENTIRE LICENSE. This License and any documents or instrument attached
hereto or referred to herein integrate all terms and conditions mentioned
herein or incidental hereto supersede all negotiations and prior writing in
respect to the subject matter hereof.
In the event of conflict between the terms, conditions, or provisions of this License
and any such document or instrument, the terms and conditions of this License shall prevail.
EFFECIlVE DATE AND EXECUTION: This License shall be effective from and
after the date it is signed by the representatives of the City. This License may be executed
in counterparts.
IN WITNESS WttlIREOF, the parties hereto have caused this License to be executed
the day and year first above written.
By: By
Title Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Scott F. Field, City Attorney
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
6
revised 2/2 1/92
V:\WP~CONTRACT~TBMBKA.RBV
BXHIBITA
TASKS TO BE PERFORMED
Temeka Advertising (Temeka) shall perform the following tasks with the understanding that
Temeka will market the kiosk program and that Temeka will own the sign structures:
1. Upon the decision of which sign is to be used, Temeka will then pwvide a
final design within five (5) working days.
2. Sign locations will be pwvided to the City of Temecuh within ten (10)
working days after the execution of the License.
3. Ground leases will be obtained if necessary within ten (10) working days of
acceptance of sign locations.
4. All necessary permits will be obtained for the directional signs.
5. Temeka will meet with City and utility personnel to spot each location to
insure no destruction of underground utilities.
6. Within sixty (60) calendar days of the execution of the License, Temeka will
manufacture and install directional signs at the City appwved locations.
The directional signs will be manufactured according to the following specifications:
1. Sizes of structures and slab will follow the city of Temecula's ordinance
guidelines.
2. All slats shall contain only the name of the subdivision and a directional
arrow. Copy shall be upper-case I-Ialvetica Medium.
3. For Safety reasons, arrows will be placed in this sequence:
1. Left, 2. Straight, 3. Right.
4. Temeka will allow for a maximum of two (2) slats per sign for directing
traffic to City/Public facilities (i.e., parks, City Hall, libraries, etc.) if needed.
5. Directional signs shall only be placed at locations approved by the City of
Temecula.
EXttIRIT A
TASKS TO BE PERFORMED
Structures will be provided with standardized cobble landscaping at their base
locations where no landscape exists. Existing landscape will be restored to
original condition.
There shall be no additions, tag signs, streamers, attention-getting devices, or
other appurtenances added to the sign as originally appwved. Further, no
other directional signage may be used such as posters, portable signs, trailer
signs or temporary subdivision signs.
In the event that it becomes necessary for whatever reason to physically
remove or relocate one or more of the directional signs, then upon the request
of the City of Temecula, Temeha agrees to pwmp~y move said sign at its sole
cost and expense and to then reinstall it at such new location as directed and
authorized by the City of Temecuh.
Temeka will use a contractor with a C-61 contractor's license chssification to
construct, install and maintain the signs. The contractor shall supply the
insurance by pwvisions of the License.
Temeka will market the pwgram as follows:
Tcmeka will set up a meeting with all developers located in the City of
Temecuh to discusi:
A) Program
B) Locations
C) Fees
D) Sign-ups
Temeka will service the City of Temecuh as follows:
Initially, identify all illegal off-site permanent signs located within the City of
Temecuh limits and report them to the City of Temecuh.
2(
Each weekend remove all weekend directional signs. We will report each
weekend activity by Tuesday a.m.
V:\WBCONTRACT~TF. MBKA.RI!V
EXI-uRIT B
PAYIV~NT SCHRDUI.R
Lease schedule for the "Kiosk" Directional Sign Program shall be no more and no less than
as follows:
Sini, le Face
Double-Face
First Year $ 62.66 $ 86.53
Second Year $ 66.14 $ 91.33
Third Year $ 73.09 $100.94
Fourth Year $ 76.58 $105.75
One time construction fee: $145 single face
$185 double face
Temeka Advertising shah pay City two percent (2 %) of gross receipts, payable
thirty (30) days after the close of each quarter.
s
The City and Temeka Advertising agree to meet annually to review lease price
and participation.
e
Temeka Advertising agrees to maintain annual lease prices with a participation
of 80 % or more.
,
The above listed fees are based upon a four (4) year contract License
representing a 33 % discount to participating developers.
V:XWPXCOI'CrRACrXTH, MIiKA.RI!V
ITEM NO.
21
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
A GENDA REPORT
City Council
David F. Dixon
July 14, 1992
Friends of French Valley Airport
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council authorize an expenditure of $7,000 for
promoting the French Valley Aviation Center Dedication Ceremony.
STAFF REPORT:
Attached you will find a request from Allan R. McDonald, Co-Chairperson of the
French Valley Airport Open House Committee. The French Valley Airport Open
House will be on July 8, 1992. They have supplied material to support the request
which is attached to this report.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
Expenditure of $7,000 to promote the French Valley Airport Dedication Ceremony.
Funding for this expenditure will come from Account #001-110-999-42-5264.
FRmNDS OF FRENCH VALLEY AIRPORT
Board of Directors MS. June Greek
City Clerk
George Campos
Pr~,d~n, 43172 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California 92590
Paul Os~vald
~.'h e Presldt'nl Dear June:
Bill Harl, er
secr,.,ar~ The Friends of French Valley Airport have received a
license from the County of Riverside to hold an Open House and
.IoeKuel>ler Dedication Ceremony at the Airport facility on Saturday, July
18, 1992 from 10:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.
led Holley
rx~c'D~e.~,~ The event is designed as a family style outing with food
and beverage rending including local wines as well as other
/ohr, A;rb/,er valley community organization booths Entertainment will be
Ray Bore/ ·
Marc Grisham continuous throughout the day and over 25 aircraft of various
Gordon Hood interests and public agencies will be on static display.
lira Ix'eatin,~
Iohn Let'Fa, The focal point of the day will be the French Valley
Larr, .',~arkhan~ Aviation Center Dedication Ceremony featuring numerous
Bob A'ICAnuIla
411an,'~cDonald government officials and aviation dignitaries. In addition,
Iohn~orarnarco many existing and potential commercial users will be intimately
/~ikef,,';cholas involved in the day's events including an economic development
AIQele breakfast that morning. We are now anticipating over 5;000
Dave Olso,, people in attendance with additional parking and other
Ronperrv facilities capable of accommodating up to 10,000 guests.
George 5avord
VVill Sparkman
Our budget to host such an event approximates $19,500.
Thus far we have raised $7,000 from local businesses as follows:
Advanced Cardiovascular Systems
M.A. Nicholas and Company
Rancho California Golf Club
Ranpac Engineering Corporation
French Valley Associates
Achen · McDonald & Associates
$3,000
1,500
1,000
500
500
500
$7,000
Our organization is hereby respectfully requesting a funds
matching donation from the City of Temecula to support this
economic development project in the amount of $7,000. The
remaining shortfall will be made up from additional sponsors and
profits from concession sales. we would have to see the
proposal presented to the City Council on Tuesday, July 7, 1992
2774(} JltltRht,N AvIr*,.lil., Sl,lll 11){) · ]~,u(t,l,x, CAIII,':,I-:'..IA ¢j2~90 .. (714)
Ms. June Greek
City Clerk
July 2, 1992
Page 2
with funding at the earliest possible time after approval to
meet our organization deadlines.
We have enclosed detailed information for the presentation
and remain available for personal presentation as required.
Please contact the undersigned through Achen · McDonald &
Associates at (714)676-3111 for any further clarification or
amplification on this proposal.
Thank you in advance for your attention given our project.
Co-Chairperson
French Valley Airport Open House
2/T/GREEK. 001/pac
Grand Opening
FRENCH VALLEY AIRPORT
Saturday, July 18
10 a.m. to 4 p.m.
Over 25 Aircraft
on Static Display including:
*Vintage Aircraft
C ' '~ *Military Aircraft
*Emergency and Special Services
~~"~' *Commercial and Corporate Aviation
*CHP & Sheriff Helicopters
Come tour our beautiful new Aviation Center and Ibrminal.t
Dedication Ceremonies Begin at 12 noon!
LIVE ENTERTAINMMENT
FOOD AND REFRESHMENTS
Tour the New
Sheriff Sub-Station
Southwest County Justice Center
Adjacent to Fre~ch Vallex' Airport ----
For More Information Contact:
FRIENDS OF FRENCH VALLEY AIRPORT
(714) 676-5090
Limited tie-down and parking available. Thrifty Car Rental Available At the Airport. No Coolers Please:
Date:
To:
From:
May 20, 1992
Riverside County Airport Commission
Friends of French Valley Airport
Subject:
Dedication .and Grand Opening of The French
Valley Airport Aviation Center and Open House
at French Valley Airport
Date of Event: Saturday, July 18, 1992
Time of Event: 10:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.
Planned Attendance: 5,000 Guests and Dignitaries
Hosts: The County of Riverside
Friends of French Valley Airport
Organizers:
George Campos - President of Friends of French Valley Airport; 30
years aviation background; 3 years experience on
Executive Committee of The Great Temecula Tractor Race;
Commercial/Industrial Real Estate Sales Consultant
John LeWay - Military aviation background; 12 years as Chief
Organizer of the Chino Airshow; Board of Directors -
Planes of Fame Museum - Chino Airport; Civil Engineering
Consultant
Allan McDonald - Military and general aviation experience; 5 years
President of Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce; 4 years
experience on Executive Committee - Temecula Valley
Balloon and Wine Festival; Financial Management
Consultant
Mission Statement:
The Friends of French Valley Airport will co-ordinate and
co-host an Open House for the local community at French
Valley Airport (Fox 70) on the occasion of the Grand
Opening and Dedication of The French Valley Aviation
Center. The event will be designed to promote the
economic benefits, community services, convenience to
travelers and accessibility to the valley by modern
aircraft provided by this county owned and operated
facility. In order to increase community awareness of
the value and attributes of the Airport and to encourage
support of its activities, a family oriented Open House
will be.provided coinciding with the Grand Opening and
dedication ceremony for The French Valley Aviation Center
on the airport facility. In addition to the local
community, other invitees include: business leaders;
civic leaders; emergency and special services groups; as
well as, government and public agency representatives who
will participate in the Grand Opening Celebration and Open ~ouse.
Scope: Entertain up to 5,000 guests from the local community
including invited dignitaries at a family style Open House. The
focal point of the day will be an official ceremony, dedicating the
Aviation Center Facility, acknowledging government agencies and
officials that made it possible. Other participants will be
significant individuals who support and promote airports and the
contribution of aviation activities to the economy. Our keynote
speaker is Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association (APOA) President
Boyer. Other speakers will include local city, county, state and
federal officials as well as economic development leaders.
Other attractions include 25 aircraft units on static display
(no air operations conducted) representating public agencies;
emergency and special services groups; public utilities; local
military; vintage; commercial/corporate; and general aviation. In
addition to the static display, other local, aviation related and
non-profit community organizations will be invited to display their
themes through booths arranged for public interaction.
Local business will be solicited for sponsorship for cash
contributions or in-kind services. Particular attention will be
given to those businesses who use or are directly benefitted by the
Airport and its operations.
Committees:
Legal/Finance/Accounting
VIP/Hospitality
Advertizing/Publicity/Promotion
Program/Entertainment
Aviation Operations
Security
Food and Beverage
Facilities
Sponsorship
Food and beverage will be served by concession with beer and
wine licensed for the day. Beer and wine will be served one glass;
per individual; per request.
Security, traffic and crowd control will be managed by both
public and qualified volunteer personnel. Normal operations of the
Airport will be conducted and supervised by the Air Operations
Committee. No interruption of airport services will be necessary
to hold the. event.
A volunteer staff of approximately 150 people will be
necessary and this group of individuals has been identified through
various service clubs and community groups.
It is also the intent of the organizing group to co-host an
Open House with the adjoining Justice Center at this same time
which will further expose the community to the public services
available at French Valley as well as provide additional security
to the entire enterprise.
Recommendation:
Approval as submitted
Respectfully:
Friends of French Valley Airport
George Campos
President
ool
3
EDA
ECONOR~iC
,.D_DE\zELOPMENI'
G ENCY
OF IIIV[,IrlSIDL COl'N'l"~'
June 25, 1992
RI%."T_.RSIDE COU,%"T'Y · ~,4gg 1T_..N'T'H Sl'11EET · P.O BOX I |~,0 · RI~,~,_.~SIDF,. C.A 92502 · (?14) ?&~..I};70 · FAX (?14} 7L'k-141,5
AVIATION· ECONO.h41C "~ CO/Vd,',UNrl t' DF'\T..LOPN~Eh*T · R~,DE%T, LOPh~E~T
State of California
Department of Alcohol Beverage Control
4505 Allstate Drive
Riverside, California 92501
Dear Sir:
The pendin9 Special Event License between the County and the
Friends ef French Valley Airport does permit wine and beer to be
concessioned at the French Valley Aviation Center Open Mouse on
July t8, 1992 between the hours of 10:00 a.m. - 4:00 p.m. provided
that the insurance certificate carries the liquor law liability
insurance. We expect the Special Event License to be executed
before July 3, 1992.
Fleese feel free to contact me if you. have any questions.
Sincerely,
Judy K. ~css
Assistant Director
EDA/Aviat/,en Unit
JMK/db
EDA
ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT
AGENCY
July 2, 1992
State of California
Department of Alcohol Beverage Control
4505 Allstate Drive
Riverside, CA 92501
Gentlemen:
Riverside County Economic Development Agency/Aviation Division is
the le~al owner6 cf the French Valley Airport. Through the Special
Even= License, we have granted the Friends of the French Vdlle~
Airport tc conduct beer and wine concessions at the French Valle~
Airport Open House on Jul~ =8, ~992 between the hours of 10:00 am
to 4:00 pm in the area designated on the enclosed map. The Friends
of ~he French ValleF Airport have an agreement wi~h the Temecula
Valley Wine Societ~ for the wane concession which we will permit
under the Special Even~ License. ~
Bincare!y,
Jud~~ss
Assistant Director
EDA/Avistion Unit
JMR/db
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
!0
11
12
i3
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
~*. iLLl~,v ~ P,,'~ ,/1 :',"-] ~ I%
LICENSE
(Friends of French Valley Airport)
The COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, herein called County, hereby
grants to FRIENDS OF FRENCH VALLEY AIPRORT, a California
corporation, herein called Licensee, a license to use the
property, herein called premises, described below upon the
following terms and conditions:
1. DescriPtion. The premises are located within French
Valley Airport, Murrieta, California, as more particularly shown
on Exhibit "A", attached hereto and by this reference made a part
of this license.
2. Use. Licensee shall use the premises exclusively to
conduct a special event to be known as the French Valley Airport
Open House which event shall be for a period of one (1) day with
an anticipated attendance of 7,500 persons.
3. Term. The term of this license shall be for a
period commencing at 6:00 a.m. on July 18, 1992, and terminating
at 9:00 p.m. on July 18, 1992, unless otherwise terminated as
provided herein.
4. Consideration. This license is granted to Licensee
in consideration for the goodwill and community awareness this
special event is intended to accomplish.
5. Reimbursement for Costs. As a means of offsetting
any costs which may be incurred by County in connection with any
removal, storage and restoration as provided in Paragraph 6(b)(i)
herein, any maintenance as provided in Paragraph 8 herein, and/or
the monitoring of Licensee's conduct hereunder, Licensee shall
reimburse County on the basis of $50.00 per hour for County's
personnel costs, payable within thirty (30) days after billing
and accounting therefor has been submitted by County to Licensee.
6. Trade Fixtures.
(a) Subject to the approval of County's Economic
Development Agency Director, Licensee may install, erect or place
temporary fencing for crowd protection and control purposes, and
for property protection purposes, and other trade fixtures as
that term is defined in Section 1019 of the Civil Code, on, upon
or within the premises, and shall remove such temporary fencing
and trade-fixtures therefrom at or prior to the termination of
this License; provided, however, that if such removal causes
injury or damage to said premises, Licensee shall restore the
premises to their original shape and condition as nearly as
practicable.
IIII
////
1
2
5
4
5
(b) In the event any such fencing and trade fixtures
are not removed, County may, at its election:
(i) Remove and store such fencing and trade
fixtures and restore the premises for the account of
Licensee, and in suCh event Licensee shall, within thirty
(30) days after billing and accounting thereof, reimburse
County for the cost so incurred; or,
(ii) Take and hold such fencing and tract fixtures
as its sole property.
7. Protection of Persons and PropertY.
8
(a) Licensee shall be responsible for the health,
9 safety and welfare of the property and persons of the general
public, the airport tenants and the French Valley Airport in
!0 general, in connection with the contemplated uses of the premises
hereunder, and Licensee shall take reasonable and necessary
11 precautions, steps, measures and actions in order to fully
discharge such responsibility, which actions shall include without
12 limitation:
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
(i) Preparation and submission of a plot plan to
County Economic Development Agency Director for approval on
or before July 2, 1992, identifying therein security and
safety lines, aircraft parking, show aircraft parking,
vehicular parking, concession areas, transportation routes,
trash recepticals, portable toilets and such other items as
directed by the County's Economic Development Agency
Director.
(ii) Coordinate with County's Sheriff and Fire
Department, and ambulance services, to insure that there are
adequate emergency services for the special event
contemplated hereunder.
20
21
24
25
26
27
28
(iii) Provide sufficient personnel for security,
aircraft traffic and vehicular traffic purposes.
(iv) Provide adequate signage for the purpose of
directing the general public to the special event
contemplated hereunder and to specific locations therein.
(v) Coordinate and make appropriate arrangements
with Fixed Based Operators at French Valley Airport for any
services which Licensee may require hereunder.
" (b) In the event County's Managing Director of Economic
Development Agency deems it necessary for Licensee to implement
additional reasonable precautions, steps, measures or actions and
directs Licensee to do so, Licensee shall promptly implement such
reasonable precautions, steps, measures or actions.
-2-
8. Maintenance. Licensee shall maintain any areas. within
the French Valley Airport which he may use in connection with the
French Valley Airport Open House, and such maintenance shall entail
keeping such areas in a neat, safe, orderly and attractive manner
during the period of such use. If Licensee fails or refuses to do
so, County may, at its election, perform such maintenance, and in
such event, Licensee shall within thirty (30) days after billing
and accounting therefor reimburse County.
6
8
10
9. Utilities. Licensee shall provide and pay for all
utilities, including without limitation, telephone, gas, water,
electricity, and rubbish collection services that he may require in
connection with his use of the premises.
10. Employees and Aaents of Licensee. Licensee shall have
the right to bring personnel on, upon or within the premises,
provided, however, that such personnel shall be considered to be
employees or agents of Licensee and not of County.
!1
t2
13
14
!5
16
17
18
19
20
21
11. InSPection bY CountY. County, through its authorized
agent, shall have, at any time during normal business hours, the
full and unrestricted right to enter the premises for the purpose
of inspection or maintenance and for the purpose of doing any and
all things which it is obligated and has a right to do under this
License.
12. Termination by County.
terminate this License forthwith.
County shall have the right to
(a) In the event Licensee fails to perform any of his
duties or obligations hereunder.
(b) In the event Licensee conducts any activity on,
upon or within the premises not authorized by this License.
(c) In the event Licensee's use, contemplated or
actual, of the premises in any manner whatsoever adversely affects,
or is otherwise inconsistent with the operation or use by County,
its other tenants, its licensees, or the general public, or French
Valley Airport.
25
26
.'.'ILL,A. C hA?.Ti~l ;'.
13. Termination by Licensee. Licensee shall have the right
to terminate this License for good cause, including without
limitation, adverse weather conditions which preclude the use of
the premises as contemplated herein, and financial complications
which would render the French Valley Airport Open House other than
in Licensee's best interest.
14. Compliance with Law. Licensee, at his sole cost and
expense, shall comply with the requirements of all local, state and
federal statutes, regulations, rules, ordinances and orders now in
force or which may be hereafter in force, pertaining to the
premises. The judgment, decree or order of any court of competent
jurisdiction, or the admission of Licensee in any action or
proceeding against Licensee, whether Licensee be a party thereto or
1
2
3
4
not, that Licensee has violated any such statutes, regulat.ions,
rules, ordinances, or orders, in the use of the premises, shall be
conclusive of that fact as between County and Licensee.
15. Discrimination or Seoreoation.
(a) Licensee shall not discriminate in recruiting,
hiring, promotion, demotion or termination practices on the basis
of religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, sex, age,
physical handicap, medical condition or marital status with respec,
to the use of the premises hereunder, and Licensee shall comply
with the provisions of the California Fair Employment and Housing
Act (Government Code Sections 12900 et seq.), the Federal Civil
Rights Act of 1964 (P.L. 88-252), and all amendments thereto,
Executive Order No. 12246 (30 Federal Register 12319), as amended,
and all Administrative Rules and Regulations issued pursuant to
said Acts and Orders.
10
(b) Licensee shall not discriminate against or cause
11 the segregation of any person or group of persons on account of
race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, sex, age,
12 physical handicap, medical condition or marital status, in the
occupancy, use, tenure or enjoyment of the premises, nor shall
13 Licensee, or any person claiming under or through him, establish oz
permit any such practice or practices, discrimination or
14
15
16.
16 license:
segregation with reference to the selection, location, number, use
or occupancy of any persons within the premises.
Insurance.
Licensee shall during the term of th]~
17 (a) Procure and maintain Workers' Compensation
Insurance as prescribed by the laws of the State of California.
18
(b) Procure and maintain comprehensive general., premise
19 liability, liquor law liability, and personal liability and
products liability coverage that shall protect Licensee from claim~
20 for damages, for personal injury, including, but not limited to,
accidental and wrongful death, as well as from claims for property
21 damage, which may arise from Licensee's use of the premises,
whether such use be by Licensee, by any sublicensee of Licensee, oz
22 by anyone employed directly or indirectly by either of them. Such
insurance shall name County and Licensee as an additional insured
23 with respect to this License and the obligations of Licensee
hereunder. Such insurance shall provide for limits of not less
24 than $2,000,000.00 per occurrence. In the event Licensee grants a
sublicense hereunder, Licensee shall require such sublicensee to
25 procure and maintain such comprehensive general, premise liability,
liquor law liability and products liability coverage, as may be
26 applicable, naming Licensee, County and such sublicensee as
additional insureds, and such insurance shall provide for the same
27 limits as required for Licensee in this Paragraph 16(b).
28
(c) Procure and maintain a special events liability an[
property damage insurance coverage that shall identify the e"'nt
-4-
for which this Licensee is granted and that shall protect ~icensee
from claims for damages for personal injury, including, but not
limited to, accidental and wrongful death, as well as from claims
for property damage, which may arise from Licensee's use of the
premises as contemplated hereunder, whether such use be by
Licensee, by any sublicensee of Licensee, or by anyone employed
directly or indirectly by either of them. Such insurance shall
name County as an additional insured with respect to this License
and the obligations of Licensee hereunder. Such insurance shall
provide for limits of not less than $2,000,000.00 per occurrence.
In the event Licensee grants a sublicense hereunder, Licensee shall
require such sublicensee to procure and maintain such special
events liability and property damage insurance coverage, as may be
applicable, naming Licensee and County as additional insureds, and
such insurance shall provide for the same limits as required for
Licensee in this Paragraph 16(c).
10
ll
lZ
!4
15
16
17
!8
19
ZO
(d) Cause his insurance carrier(s) to furnish County by
direct mail, on or before July 2, 1992, with certificate(s) of
insurance showing that such insurance is in full force and effect,
and that County and Licensee are named as an additional insured
with respect to this License and the obligations of Licensee
hereunder. Licensee shall not use or otherwise take Dossession of
the premises until insurance has been obtained as reauired by this
ParaaraDh 16 and County has been furnished with certificate(s) of
insurance as required herein.
17. Hold Harmless.
(a) Licensee represents that he has inspected the
premises, accepts the condition thereof and that he fully assumes
any and all risks incidental to the use thereof. County shall not
be liable to Licensee, his agents, employees, subcontractors or
independent contractors for any personal injury or property damage
suffered by them which may result from hidden, latent or other
dangerous conditions in, on, upon or within the premises; provided,
however, that such dangerous conditions are not caused by the sole
negligence of County, its officers, agents or employees.
(b) Licensee shall indemnify and hold County,-its
officers, agents, employees and independent contractors free and
harmless from any liability, claims, judgments or demands for
property damage, bodily injury or death (Licensee's employees
included) or any other element or damage of any kind or nature,
relating to or in anywise connected with or arising from its use
and responsibilities in connection therewith of the premises or the
condition thereof or the obligations to be performed by Licensee
hereunder,. save and except claims or litigation arising through the
sole negligence of County, and will make good to and reimburse
County for any expenditures, including reasonable attorneys fees,
County may incur by reason of such matter, and Licensee shall
defend, at his expense, including attorney fees, County, its
officers, agents, employees and independent contractors in any
claim or legal action based upon such alleged acts or omissions,
save and except claims or litigation arising through the sole
negligence of County.
(C) The specified insurance limits required i~
Paragraph 16 herein shall in no way limit or circumscribe
Licensee's obligations to indemnify and hold County free and
harmless in this Paragraph 17 herein.
4 (d) Licensee shall require any and all persons, who are
directly or indirectly participating in the French Valley Airport
5 Open House to execute and deliver to Licensee written waivers
relative to such participation, which shall waive therein any
6 claims for damages which such persons may assert as against
Licensee and County.
?
18. Toxic Materials. During the term of this license,
8 Licensee shall not violate any federal, state or local law, or
ordinance or regulation, relating to industrial hygiene or to the
9 environmental condition on, under or about the premises including,
but not limited to, soil and groundwater conditions. Further,
10 Licensee, his successors, assigns and sublessees, shall not use,
generate, manufacture, produce~ store or dispose of on, under or
1! about the premises or transport to or from the premises any
flammable explosives, asbestos, radioactive materials, hazardous
12 wastes, toxic substances or related injurious materials, whether
injurious by themselves or in combination with other materials
13 (collectively, "hazardous materials"). For the purpose of this
license, hazardous materials shall include, but not be limited to,
14 substances defined as "hazardous substances." "Hazardous
materials," or "toxic substances," in the Comprehensive
15 Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 198D, as
amended, 42 U.S.C. Section 9601, et seq.; the Hazardous Mater~-als
16 Transportation Act, 49 U.S.C. Section 1801, et seq.; the Res~ 2ce
Conservation and Recovery Act, 42 U.S.C. Section 6901, et seq.; and
17 those substances defined as "hazardous wastes" in Section 52117 of
the California Health and Safety Code or as "hazardous substances"
18 in Section 25316 of the California Health and Safety Code; and in
the regulations adopted in publications promulgated pursua'nt to
19 said laws.
19. Inqress and Eqress. Licensee shall be permitted
ingress and egress to and from the premises over the access
route(s) as denoted on Exhibit "A" or as may be designated by
County's Managing Director of the Economic Development Agency.
20. Permits, Licenses and Taxes. Licensee shall secure, at
his expense, all necessary permits and licenses as it may be
required to obtain, and Licensee shall pay for all fees and taxes
levied or required by any authorized public entity.
25 21.. Assignment. Licensee cannot assign, sublet, mortgage,
hypothecate or otherwise transfer in any manner any of his rights,
26 duties or obligations hereunder to any person or entity without the
written consent of County being first obtained.
P.?
22. Bindin~ on Successors. Licensee, his assigns and
28 successors in interest, shall be bound by all the terms and
conditions contained in this License and all of the parties ~"~.reto
.,.'u,~',:~ ~7,~i~.. shall be jointly and severally liable hereunder.
1
2
4
5
6
8
9
10
11
12
13
!4
15
· ' 16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
23. Surrender in Good Condition. Licensee shall not permit
waste or damage to the premises, and upon the expiration, or
earlier termination, of this Licensee, Licensee shall restore the
premises to a condition as they now are, reasonable wear and tear
and damage by the elements excepted.
24. Waiver of PerfOrmance. No waiver by County at any time
of any of the terms and conditions of this License shall be deemed
or construed as a waiver at any time thereafter of the same or of
any other terms or conditions contained herein or of the strict and
timely performance of such terms and conditions.
25. SeverabilitY. The invalidity of any provision in this
License as determined by a court of competent jurisdiction shall in
no way affect the validity of any other provision hereof.
26. Notices. Any notices required or desired to be served
by either party upon the other shall be addressed to the respective
parties set forth below:
COUNTY: LICENSEE:
County of Riverside
Economic Development Agency
Aviation Unit
3499 Tenth Street
Post Office Box 1180
Riverside, CA 92502
Friends of French Valledy Airport
c/o George Campos, President
27740 Jefferson Avenue, Suite 100
Temecula, CA 92590
or to such other addresses as from time to time shall be designated
by the respective parties.
27. Venue. Any action at law or in equity brought by
either of the parties hereto for the purpose of enforcing a right
or rights provided for by this License shall be tried in a Court of
competent jurisdiction in the County of Riverside, State of
California, and the parties hereby waive all provisions of law
providing for a change of venue in such proceedings to any other
county.
28. Attorneys' Fees. In the event of any litigation or
arbitration between Licensee and County to enforce any of the
provisions of this License or any rights of any party hereto, the
unsuccessful party to such litigation or arbitration agrees to pay
to the successful party all costs and expenses, including
reasonable attorneys' fees, incurred therein by the successful
party, all of which shall be included in and as a part of the
judgment or award rendered in such litigation or arbitration.
29. Countv's Representative. County hereby appoints the
Managing Director of Economic Development Agency as its authorized
representative to administer this License.
30. AOent for Service of Process. It is expressly
understood and agreed that in the event Licensee is not a resident
-7-
1
of the State of California or he is an association or part-nership
2 without a member or partner resident of the State of California, or
he is a foreign corporation, then in any such event Licensee shall
3 file with County's Director, Economic Development A ency upo' -ts
execution hereof, a designation of a natural person residing ~n the
4 State of California, giving his or her name, residence and business
addresses, as his agent for the purpose of service of process in
5 any court action arising out of or based upon this license, and the
delivery to such agent of a copy of any process in any such action
6 shall constitute valid service upon Licensee. It is further
expressly understood and agreed that if for any reason service of
7 such process upon such agent is not feasible, then in such event
Licensee may be personally served with such process out of this
8 County and that such service shall constitute valid service upon
Licensee. It is further expressly understood and agreed that
Licensee is amenable to the process so served, submits to the
jurisdiction of the Court so obtained and waives any and all
10 objections and protests thereto.
!1
!3
!4
31. Entire License. This License is intended by the
parties hereto as a final expression of their understanding with
respect to the subject matter hereof and as a complete and
exclusive statement of the terms and conditions thereof and
supersedes any and all prior agreements and understandings, oral or
written, in connection therewith. This License may not be changed
or modified except upon the written consent of the parties hereto.
!5 32. Authority for Director of General Services to Execute.
The authority for the Director of General Services to execute--this
16 License is contained in Ordinance No. 598.
!7
19
Dated:
ATTEST:
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
By:
Director, General Services Agency
20
GERALD A. FALONEY
Clerk of the Board
By
Deputy)
23 (SEAL)
24 r'
25
FRIENDS OF FRENCH VALLEY AIRPORT, a
California corporation
(Printed Name)
Title: President
26
By:
27
28 PHL:dbf/2831ease
031692
Title:
8
(Printed Name)
TEMECULA COMMUNITY
SERVICES DISTRICT
AGENDA
ITEM
NO. 1
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
HELD JUNE 23, 1992
A regular meeting of the Temecula Community Services District was called to order at 9:23
PRESENT: 5 DIRECTORS:
PM.
Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Mu~oz,
Parks
ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None
Also present were City Manager David F. Dixon, City Attorney Scott F. Field and June S.
Greek, City Clerk.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None given.
CONSENT CALENDAR
It was moved by Director Birdsall, seconded by Director Moore to approve Consent Calendar
Item No. 1.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
1. Minutes
1.1
PUBLIC HEARINGS
2.
5 DIRECTORS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Mu~oz,
Parks
0 DIRECTORS: None
0 DIRECTORS: None
Approve the minutes of June 9, 1992.
Temecula Community Services District Assessments (Rates and Charqes) - FY 1992-
President Parks asked City Clerk June Greek if she has the affidavits relating to this
hearing. City Clerk Greek answered that she does have the affidavits of posting and
mailing.
Minutee/062392 -1 - 07/01/92
CSD Minutes June 23.1992
It was moved by Director Birdsall, seconded by Director Moore to receive and file
affidavits. The motion was unanimously carried.
City Clerk Greek stated that the City has received the following letters in protest to the
adoption of rates and charges for park, street lighting, slope maintenance, recycling
and refuse programs for Fiscal Year 1992-93.
Ten (10) letters of protest from:
Lucien E. Baran
43020 Agena Street
Temecula, CA 92592
Joe Prentice
Resident (No address given)
Edward H. Boseker, M.D.
601 North Tustin Avenue
Santa Ana, CA 92705
(protesting assessments on
four separate parcels)
William C. Schweinfurth
c/o Heritage Mobile Home Estates
31130 General Kearney Road
Temecula, CA 92591
James J. O'Connor
2101 East Second Street, Apt. 204
Long Beach, CA 90803
David Pearson & Ralph Navarro
41877 Enterprise Circle North
Temecula, CA 92590
David Pearson
41877 Enterprise Circle North
Temecula, CA 92590
Sudhir Kalaria
657 Blenfield Place
Diamond Bar, CA 91765
Vincent F. Hammang
39424 Canyon Rim Circle
Temecula, CA 92590
Robert H. Davison
645 E. EIder Street
Fallbrook, CA 92028
Six (6) formal Pre-hearing Appeals:
Paul Silverstone
28828 Via Roja
Murrieta, CA 92563
Peter Pozzuoli
26 Rollingwood Lane
Fallbrook, CA 92028
Victor R. Naus
30970 Shaba Circle
Temecula, CA 92592
Meadowview Community Assn.
P.O. Box 788
Temecula, CA 92593
Richard A. DeKimpe
27403 Larchbluff Drive
Rancho Palos Verdes, CA
90274
Ronald Alvarado
6072 Candlelight Lane
Yorba Linda, CA 92686
Minutes/062392 -2- 07101/92
CSD Minutes June 23.1992
Four (4) letters in support:
Carliene M. Danielsen,
President,
Economic Development Corporation
Temecula, CA 92590
Richard C. Kurtz
CDM Group, Inc.
43500 Ridge Park Drive
Temecula, Ca 92590
Helen Hudson Lovaas
CEO
Hudson Respiratory Care, Inc.
Temecula, CA 92590
Charlie Nicholls
CDM Broup, Inc.
Temecula, CA 92590
City Clerk June Greek stated the Board of Directors has been provided with copies of
all the letters and a motion would be in order to waive reading in full of letters.
It was moved by Director Lindemans, seconded by Director Moore to waive reading
in full of letters. The motion was unanimously carried.
President Parks opened the public hearing at 9:30 PM.
Donald Berg, 41511 Riesling Court, spoke in support of the proposed assessments and
thanked the Board for establishing the senior citizens facility.
Thomas Langley, 27505 Ynez Road, thanked the Board for their support of the youth
in the community and spoke in favor of the proposed assessments.
Director of Community Services Shawn Nelson presented the staff report.
Councilmember Mu~oz asked if the water conservation program has been
implemented. Mr. Nelson reported the staff is now tracking water usage for slopes,
park and medians and will be bringing that to the Board in the near future.
President Parks closed the public hearing at 9:40 PM.
It was moved by Mayor Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Moore to approve staff
recommendation as follows:
2.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 92-07
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ADOPTING RATES AND CHARGES FOR
COMMUNITY SERVICES/PARKS, STREET LIGHTING, SLOPE MAINTENANCE
AND RECYCLING AND REFUSE COLLECTION SERVICES FOR FISCAL YEAR
1992-93
Minutes1062392 -3- 07101192
CSD Minutes June 23.1992
Councilmember Mu~oz stated he will support the motion, however he feels reluctant
to raise taxes, even a very small increase, at this time.
Director Birdsall stated that many citizens in the community have received refunds in
the form of a check through the appeals process.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5 DIRECTORS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Mu~oz,
Parks
NOES: 0 DIRECTORS: None
ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None
GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT
None given.
COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR REPORT
None given.
CITY ATTORNEY REPORT
None given.
DIRECTORS REPORTS
Director Lindemans requested that staff look at the possibility to purchase Bedford Property
behind the Sports Park. A straw vote was taken where are directors were in favor.
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Director Moore, seconded by Director Lindemans to adjourn at 9:50 PM.
The motion was unanimously carried.
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, TCSD Secretary
Ronald J. Parks, President
Minutes/062392 -4,- 07/01192
ITEM
NO.
2
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER ~
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
DAVID F. DIXON ~
JULY 14, 1992
AGREEMENT FOR CONCESSION SERVICES
PREPARED BY: '
HERMAN D. PARKER, RECREATION SUPERINTENDENT
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors:
Approve agreement with Barbara Thompson of Barbie's Hot Dogs, Etc. to provide
concession services at City facilities and special events for the City of Temecula.
DISCUSSION:
On April 17, 1992, Request For Proposals were released to qualified firms to provide
concession services as needed at City facilities and at City special events. The
Request for Proposal process was concluded on April 24, 1992. The proposal
submitted by Barbara Thompson of Barbie's Hot Dogs Etc., provided the City with the
widest variety of foods and snacks at the most affordable prices. Proof of health
permit, sellers permit, and general liability insurance were also included in the proposal
submitted by Barbie's Hot Dogs Etc.
Enclosed is a copy of the agreement for concession services for your review.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The City will receive 12% of the gross revenues for all on-going City sponsored
activities and 16% of the gross revenues for special events as a result of this
concession agreement. The City shall also receive 25% of the gross revenues for
youth sports activities, of which 15% shall be given to the youth sports organization
and 10% shall remain with the City.
AGREEMENT
This agreement is made and entered into by and between City of Temecula, and
Name:
Barbara Thomoson
Address:
30553 So,ca Court
Temecula. CA 92592
Phone:
(714) 676-1170
Social Security No.:
027-26-7385
hereinafter referred to as the "Contractor", as follows:
SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED BY CONTRACTOR, Contractor shall perform the
following: the sellina of food (see Exhibit A for menu, prices, and schedule), during the
days and times, and at the location as mutually agreed upon between the City Manager
and Contractor. Times, days and location are as follows:
TERMS. The term of this agreement shall commence on the I st day of July, 1992,
through the 30th of June ,1994, unless earlier terminated pursuant to Paragraph 8
herein.
COMPENSATION. In consideration of the performance of the services provided herein.
Contractor will provide: Compensation 16% of Gross Revenues Dayable to the City
within 24 hours for Special Events and 12% of Gross Revenues on the 30th day of each
month for continually scheduled City activities. If arovidinQ on-ooina Youth Sports
Concession Services. said comoensation shall be 25% of Gross Revenues due on the
30th day of each month: 15% to Youth Soorts and 10% retained by the City for utilities
and other related costs.
COMPLIANCES. Contractor, in the conduct of the service contemplated hereunder, shall
comply with all statues State of Federal, and all ordinances, rules and regulations
enacted or issued by the City of Temecula or the Community Services Department
Director.
PURPOSE. The services Contractor performs pursuant to this agreement are intended
to have the result of increasing the ability and enjoyment of the participants in the
activities and/or services Contractor conducts or provides. The means and manner by
which Contractor accomplished this result and conducts the activity or provides the
service shall be determined by the Contractor.
INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. Both parties hereto in the performance of this agreement
will be acting in an independent capacity and not as agents, employees, partners, or
joint ventures of one another. Contractor is not an employee of the City of Temecula
or Community Services Department and is not entitled to any of the rights, benefits or
privileges of the City of Tqmecula employees including but not limited to medical o~
worker's compensation insurance.
10.
11.
HOLD HARMLESS. Contractor shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of
Temecula and the Community Services Department, agents and employees· from and
against any and all claims, demands, liabilities, actions or causes of action of any nature
which may be asserted, prosecuted or established against them· or any of them, for
damages of any nature arising out or in any manner connected with the conduct of the
aforesaid services by Contractor.
TERMINATION. In the event either party hereto fails or refuses to perform any of the
provisions hereof imposed upon such party hereunder, such party shall be deemed in
default in the performance of this agreement. If such default is not cured within a period
of ten (10) days after receipt by such defaulting party from the other party heretoparty
may terminate the agreement forthwith by giving to the defaulting party written notice
thereof.
ASSIGNMENT. Contractor shall not assign or otherwise transfer this agreement or any
interest therein· or monies payable hereunder.
PREVIOUS AGREEMENT. Any and all existing agreements, or renewals thereof,
between the parties hereto, covering the same subject matter, are hereby canceled and
superseded by this agreement, and such prior agreements shall have no further force of
effect.
PARAGRAPH HEADINGS. The paragraph headings contained herein are for convenience
and reference only and are not intended to define or limit the scope of this agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this agreement to be executed,
the day and year first above written.
· 19 BY
Date Consultant
The foregoing Agreement is hereby approved as to sufficiency
Date
,19
BY
David F. Dixon, City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
~/:: ,19:"~BY
Date
Scott F. Field· City Attorney
ATTEST:
· 19 BY
Date
June S. Greek, City Clerk
Community Services Department Secretary
PROPOSAL#1
EXHIBIT A
MENU
BARBIE'S FOOT LONG HOT DOG
REGULAR HOT DOG
TOPPINGS
...SAUERKRAUT - CHEESE - CHILI - BEANS
BURRITO
GERMAN SAUSAGE
ITALIAN SAUSAGE
HAWAIIAN SAUSAGE
HAMBURGER
HOT CHEESE NACHO'S
POTATO CHIPS
POPCORN
COTTON CANDY :
ASSORTED CANDY'S :=
BIG LEAGUE GUM
SUNFLOWER SEEDS
SNACK CAKES
ICE CREAM SANDWICHES
ASSORTED CANNED SOFT DRINKS
LEMONADE
ICEAD TEA- HOT TEA
COFFEE
HOT CHOCOLATE
HOT SOUP
$1.75
1.00
.25
.50
2.50
2.50
2.50
1.00
1,00..,:
f
.25.~.50
.50
.50
.25 & .75'
1.00
.25 & .50
.50
.75
.75
.75
.75
.75
.75
1.00
TEMECULA
REDEVELOPM ENT
AGENCY
AGENDA
ITEM
NO.
1
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
HELD JUNE 23, 1992
A regular meeting of the Temecula Redevelopment Agency was called to order at 9:50 PM.
PRESENT: 5 AGENCY MEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore,
Parks, Mu~oz
ABSENT: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None
Also present were Executive Director David F. Dixon, General Counsel Scott F. Field and
Agency Secretary June S. Greek.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None given.
AGENCY BUSINESS
1. Minutes
It was moved by Member Moore, seconded by Member Parks to approve the minutes
of June 23, 1992. The motion was unanimously carried.
2. Allocation of Funds for Old Town Specific Plan
Executive Director David Dixon presented the staff report.
It was moved by Member Birdsall, seconded by Member Moore to approve staff
recommendation as follows:
2.1
Appropriate $50,000 from Redevelopment Agency (RDA) Fund Balance
for the Old Town Specific Plan.
The motion was unanimously carried.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
None given.
GENERAL COUNSEL'S REPORT
None given.
4~.DAMIN\062392
Temecula Redevelopment Agency Minutes June 23. 1992
AGENCY MEMBERS REPORTS
None given.
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Member Lindemans, seconded by Member Moore to adjourn at 9:54 PM.
The motion was unanimously carried.
J. Sal Mu~oz, Chairperson
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk/Agency Secretary
/
4~D, DA,MII~Ft06Zt92 -2- 06/26/{)2
DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED
FOR THE RECORD
The Temecula Crash
THE BORDER PATROL IS GUILTY!
On June 2 , six deaths were added to the list of casualties caused directly by
the Border Patrol as part of the U.S. Government War on Immigrants. Four
young students, a Mexican immigrant and a local businessman were killed after
another:_ of the Border Patrol ' s high-speed chases ended in a tragic crash in
front of Temecula Valley High School.
The powers that be have charged the young Mexican driver of the vehicle being
pursued with six counts of murder. This is an outrage! The Border Patrol is
guilty!
These high-speed chases by the Border Patrol have cost the lives of at least
25 people since 1980 . According to the San Diego Union, between 1983 and
1990, 11 people, including an infant, were killed and 128 people injured in
vehicular crashes following Border Patrol pursuits.
A former Border Patrol Agent who left the Border Patrol after one of the
worst such crashes blamed the Temecula crash on a "racist" mentality that
"permeates the whole agency. " "These are cowboys on a John Wayne trip. . .It' s
a gung-ho mentality. There is no emphasis on public safety" , he said.
It is no surprise that the internal investigation conducted by the INS (La
Migra) completely exonerated the Border Patrol agents involved in the
Temecula crash. Federal judge Alicemarie Stotler showed the position of the
federal government when she rejected out of hand the city of Temecula ' s suit
to limit high-speed pursuits by the Border Patrol within Temecula. She said
that she could see no reason to limit the Border Patrol ' s activities since
"Only . . .three accidents have been caused by those fleeing from the Border
Patrol within the city of Temecula in the past four years. " The city pointed
out that those three accidents resulted in 8 deaths and 12 injuries.
Many have expressed outrage over this crash and have said, "Get the Border
Patrol the hell out of town! " . We agree. They should be booted out of every
town!
But Border Patrol supporters Rep. Ron Packard and Sen. John Seymour have been
meeting with INS Commissioner Gene McNary in the wake of the Temecula crash
to discuss how to use this tragedy as a springboard for intensified
militarization of the border and further attacks against immigrants.
Seymour' s proposal for a "solution" to these crashes is for the Border Patrol
to be provided with surplus military helicopters for "safer" pursuits(
There' s a problem with the position some are raising that says "Take the
Border Back to the Border" . What does that do except give our approval to
the brutalization of immigrants as long as it doesn't affect us?
We the undersigned demand that all murder charges be dropped against the
young Mexican driver, and that all immigrant victims of the Temecula crash be
released immediately (They are being held without bail as "witnesses") . We
are outraged that immigrants have been made the scapegoats for this entire
(over)
episode and that our government would try to take advantage of this tragedy
to whip up anti-immigrant hysteria . We will redouble our efforts to stop our
government from using this incident to further militarize the border. If
anyone is to be charged with murder, it should be the Border Patrol!
San Diego Chapter, La Resistencia
Please include me as a signatory of this statement on the Temecula Crash
X
Name
Title
Address
Telephone #
Enclosed is my contribution in the amount of $ towards the
publishing of this statement and to build this movement of resitance.
Please provide me with more information on La Resistencia and how I can
be part of this movement to stop the U. S. Government War on Immigrants.
Please do not include my name on published lists of signatories but let me
know of future actions so that I can be part of them.
To contact La Resistencia in San Diego, Call (619) 221-7818 or mail to
La Resistencia
P.O. BOX 2328
SAN DIEGO, CA 92112