Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout022201 PTS AgendaIn compliance with the Americans ~vith Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk at (909) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting wilI enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR35.102.35.104 ADA Title II] AGENDA TEMECULA PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION TO BE HELD AT CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, California Thursday, February 22, 2001 at 6:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER: FLAG SALUTE ROLL CALL: COMMISSIONERS: Coe, Connerton, Katan, Lanier, Edwards PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Commission on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are lifnited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Commission about an item not listed on the Agenda, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Commission Secretary. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address. For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the Recording Secretary before the Commission gets to that item. There is a three (3) minute time limit for individual speakers. NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless members of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. COMMISSION CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Minutes of October 26, 2000 and November 1C 2000 RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the Minutes of October 26, 2000 1.2 Approve the Minutes of November 16, 2000 (to be delivered under separate cover) 1 COMMISSION BUSINESS 2. Emergency Transportation Circulation Plan (ETCP) RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 ETCP Subcommittee discussion of recent meeting. 3. Public/Traffic Safety Commission Meeting Schedule Revision RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission consider the feasibility of holding one regularly scheduled meeting per month. 4. Traffic Engineer's Report 5. Police Chief's Report 6. Fire Chief's Report 7. Commission Reports ADJOURNMENT The next regular meeting of the City of Temecula Public/Traffic Safety Commission will be held on Thursday, March 8, 2001, at 6:00 P.M., Temecula City Hall, Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. 2 r:\traffi¢\commissnXagendaX2001 \0222 Agenda&jp ITEM NO. 1 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION OCTOBER 26, 2000 CALL TO ORDER The City of Temecula Public/Traffic Safety Commission convened in a regular meeting at 6:00 P.M., on Thursday, October 26, 2000, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. FLAG SALUTE The audience was led in the Flag salute by Commissioner Coe. ROLLCALL Present: Commissioners *Coe, Edwards, Katan, Lanier, and Chairman Connerton. Absent: None. Also Present: Director of Public Works Hughes, Deputy Director of Public Works Parks, Senior Engineer Moghadam, Associate Engineer Gonzalez, Battalion Chief Ritchey, Police Chief Domenoe, Police Sergeant DiMaggio, Administrative Secretary Pyle, and Minute Clerk Hansen. * (Commissioner Coe left the meeting at 7:09 P.M.) PRESENTATION Presentation by the Police Department regardin.q Special Teams and Enforcement Programs in the City of Temecula Sergeant Aim relayed that the Commission would receive an update with respect to the numerous community-oriented policing programs, noting that these Officers are based at three of the storefront facilities, as follows: the Old Town facility, the Target Shopping Center facility, and the Promenade Mall facility; and introduced the POP II Team Officers, Officer Anderson, and Quinata. Officer Anderson presented an overview of the Temecula Against Graffiti (TAG) Program, noting that the program was conducted by volunteers from the Police Department under the supervision of the POP Team, relaying that there was additional assistance from the Temecula Public Works Department; via overhead data, provided information regarding the reduction in graffiti from 1996 to this point in time due to the effectiveness of this program, relaying additional information regarding a specific time period between October of 1999 to December of 1999 where one individual was responsible for a great amount of graffiti (i.e., 82 counts were filed against this individual). For Commissioner Edwards, Officer Anderson provided additional information regarding the individual who was charged with the numerous graffiti crimes, noting that after spending time in jail, this 17-year old juvenile ultimately (in lieu of restitution) was required to paint his street art for the Ollie House, a skateboarding facility, relaying that he was eventually hired by the company for his artistic works. In response to Chairman Connerton, Officer Anderson provided an overview of the updated laws regarding graffiti, noting that $400 or more in damages now constituted a felony, providing additional information regarding the consequences associated with this crime. Officer Anderson provided an overview of the Tobacco Decoy Program, also known as 308A, noting that Penal Code 308.A states that no person shall furnish or sell tobacco products to a minor; noted that the success of this program was based on compliance; relayed that the program was conducted quarterly, stating that in the year 2000 there were no incidents in the City of Temecula; and for Chairman Connerton, relayed the consequences of selling tobacco to a minor, noting that individuals were cited. Officer Ouinata provided an overview of the Crime-Free Multi-Housing Program in the City of Temecula, noting the cooperative efforts between the Police Department, the City staff, Fire Prevention, and the apartment complex managers; relayed that the program was designed to enhance the quality of life within the multi-housing apartment complexes, relaying that there were approximately 25 complexes within the City, advising that of these 25 complexes, 17 were part of the program, providing additional information regarding the program; for Commissioner Edwards, relayed the rationale for all 25 complexes not participating, noting the costs associated with the inspection process which requires certain lighting standards, and maintenance and hedges standards; for Commissioner Edwards, advised that all 17 complexes involved with the program were in compliance, noting that there were yearly inspections, providing additional information regarding efforts to have all 25 complexes involved in the program; for Chairman Connerton, provided additional information regarding the current process of review of the Planning Commission's development plans in order to make recommendations to applicants associated with multi-housing complexes regarding the program; and for Commissioner Coe, confirmed that the complexes not participating in the program did have a higher crime history, noting the additional difficulties these complexes had evicting a person involved in a crime. Officer Quinata providing an overview of the ABC Juvenile Decoy Program which was a component of the Enforce Responsible Alcohol Sales in the City of Temecuia (ERAClT) Program, noting that out of eighty businesses contacted, four were cited, relaying that there were administrative consequences due to ABC's additional involvement, advising that ABC had the jurisdiction to close a business for a period of time; and noted that this program was very successful, relaying that the success was based on compliance. Officer McEleain, from the POP I Team, provided an overview of the Off-road Vehicle Enforcement Program, noting that the program was initiated by the Police Department in 1996 due to the increase in calls of complaint; present the 3-Phase Program, as follows: Phase I which consisted of contacting and educating the affected property owners and obtaining a trespass letter to enter the property and enforce the laws, Phase II which consisted of the issuance of over 300 warnings, and the education of the drivers, and Phase II1 which consisted of citing individuals; provided an overview of the resources utilized (i.e., mounted posse reserves), noting that this was a labor intensive program, specifically due to the need to educate the drivers since for numerous years people have come from various cities to off-road and no longer can participate in this recreation in this area due to the development and the vested interests of the residents in maintaining a quality of life; provided information, via overheads, regarding the coordinated efforts with the City of Murrieta; for Chairman Connerton, relayed the areas that drivers were permitted to off-road, noting that drivers were educated regarding this information; and provided data regarding the decrease in incidents since the program's inception. Officer Potter provided an overview of the Promenade Mall Program; noted that the Police Department has responded to over 744 calls for service during the last year, inclusive of lost wallet incidents, and burglaries, relaying that the number of fraud and forgery calls in a year's time has been 21, specifying that there have been 53 burglaries (which are felonies), 123 shoplifting cases, 22 embezzlements, 149 misdemeanor arrests, and 56 felony arrests; via overhead graphs, provided the statistical data related to the crimes at the mall site, noting that the lowest numbers represent the felonies; with pleasure reported that in comparison to alternate malls or regional shopping centers, the crime at the Promenade Mall was dramatically lower; for Chairman Connerton, noted that he attributed tl~e success of the Iow crime to the high visibility of the Police Department, the Forest City Management, the Burns Security Services which was the service contracted for this site, and the overall great community; and for Chairman Connerton, relayed that there has not been a presence of gangs. Commissioner Coe, echoed by Chairman Connerton, commended the Police Department with respect to the great work. PUBLIC COMMENTS Ms. Camerone Welch-Thornson, 43210 Via Sabino, read a letter into the record inclusive of 40 residenrs signatures (which was submitted to the clerk) regarding concern with respect to of the increase in traffic flows and speeds in the Crowne Hill Development; requested the following: 1) that a speed limit sign (25 MPH) be installed at the bottom of the Via Sabino/De Portola Road intersection, 2) that the Public/Traffic Safety Commission consider installing signage stating Children at Play at the top of the hill on Via Sabino, intersecting Elizabeth Road, and 3) that the Public/Traffic Safety Commission consider increasing Police enforcement in this area to control speed. In response to Chairman Connerton, Police Sergeant DiMaggio relayed that he would place the radar trailer on Via Sabino, and would additionally have the neighborhood Officer increase enforcement in this area. For Commissioner Edwards, Deputy Director of Public Works Parks relayed that per phone conversations, he had directed Ms. Welch-Thomson to address concerns to the Public/Traffic Safety Commission, relaying that if it was the Public/Traffic Safety Commission's desire, staff could be directed to investigate the matter; and advised that some of the streets in this particular area were still under construction. For Chairman Connerton, Director of Public Works Hughes relayed that if it was the Commission's desire staff could investigate this issue and it could be agendized for a future meeting, recommending that there be additional enforcement at this time. Ms. Joni Dominguez, 43220 Via Sabino, requested that the Public/Traffic Safety Commission consider agendizing the issue of opening Via Sabino, and re-opening Via Alvaro. In response to Chairman Connerton, Director of Public Works Hughes relayed that there had been a temporary street opening to facilitate construction activity, noting that the street opening issues could be addressed when the item was agendized. Chairman Connerton advised Ms. Dominquez that she would be notified when this issue would be agendized, reiterating that Police enforcement would be increased at this time in this area. COMMISSION BUSINESS 1. School Bus Construction Specifications and Requirement-~ RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission review and discuss the specifications and requirements for the buses. Senior Engineer Moghadam relayed that Director of Transportation William McKinney from the Temecula Valley Unified School District would provide a presentation regarding the differential between the specifications and requirements for school buses verses public transit buses. Mr. McKinney presented a videotape regarding the track record of school buses, which noted that it was the safest form of transportation in the United States, relaying that it was 172 times safer for a child to ride the school bus than for a parent to driver his or her child to school; relayed additional data regarding school bus safety standards, as follows: the fuel tank was covered with a steel cage, the roof bow which provided roll- over protection, the body strength inclusive of two sets of rivets, the mirrors which allow the driver to view the front of the bus, and the side of the bus, the seats with high padded construction which provided compartmentalization, the amber flashing lights and the stop arm; noted the requirements for school bus drivers, as follows: drivers must submit to drug and alcohol testing, have a minimum of 20 hours of behind-the-wheel training, 20 hours of classroom instruction, and first aid training; relayed that solely 17% of the potential ridership are actually on the buses, noting that the majority of the students are being transported in passenger cars; and provided data regarding the vehicles that could be taken off the read with additional bussing. Mr. McKinney provided additional data regarding school bus transportation in the year 2000, noting that while no students were killed or sustained an incapacitating injury while riding a bus, that in vehicles driving during school hours, 21 students were killed in passenger cars, and 17 students sustained incapacitating injuries in the State of California; with respect to the recent discussion in the City of Temecula to utilize transit buses to augment the school transportation system, provided additional data regarding the great differential between school bus standards, and transit buses, relaying that there were approximately three times more bus collisions with the transit buses, noting that the significant difference was regarding the required safety features for school buses, reiterating the standards; noted the extensive required training for school bus drivers; relayed that students are educated with respect to emergency issues; and advised that there were specifically designed routes to minimize the distance that students were required to walk to the school bus stops. For Chairman Connerton, Mr. McKinney advised that any bus operating as a school bus would have to adhere to the previously mentioned standards; provided additional information regarding the bus inspection process; noted that the Temecula Valley Unified School District currently owns 44 school buses, noting that 14 of those buses were utilized to transport students with disabilities, advising that two of these buses, were built before the 1977 regulations were in effect, noting the efforts in the United States to remove the 1977 buses; relayed that the radius criteria determining whether a student qualified for school bus transportation varied per grade level, as follows: for elementary students the area radius was one mile, for middle school students the radius was two miles, and for high school students the radius was 2.5 miles; noted that there have been lobbying efforts to increase school bussing provisions, providing additional information; presented data regarding the need for additional buses if the area perimeters were based on walking distances; and relayed information regarding the California Department of Education's design of a California utility bus which meets the school bus safety features, and could additionally be utilized to transport other populations when not being utilized to transport children to and from school. Commissioner Coe noted that he was impressed with the safety aspects of the school bus transportation. For Commissioner Lanier, Mr. McKinney relayed that 17% of the population of students in California are riding a school bus, providing additional information regarding the lack of funding available for additional buses; and confirmed that in the City of Temecula, the buses are riding full, noting the maximizing of the capacity levels. Chairman Connerton recommended that the videotape be presented to the public during a City Council meeting recess over the cable network, advising that the data was extremely informative. Commissioner Lanier commented on the safety issues associated with school buses. Mr. McKinney distributed brochures regarding the Stop in the Name of Love Program, regarding the school bus transportation. For Commissioner Katan, Mr. McKinney relayed that if it was the desire of the City Council, that tonight's presentation could be provided at a City Council meeting. In response to Chairman Connerton, Mr. McKinney relayed that his staff was investigating having this data available at the upcoming Safety Expo. Additional discussion ensued regarding the benefits of informing community residents with respect to the safety issues associated with school bus transportation. It was noted that Commissioner Coe left the meeting at 7:09 P.M. Chairman Connerton thanked Mr. McKinney for the informative presentation. For informational purposes, Chairman Connerton announced that Commissioner Edwards had been nominated for the 2000 North County Times Woman of Merit Award along with nine alternate women, advising that she had been included in a list of women with noteworthy accomplishments; and noted that Commissioner Lanier had been re- appointed to another term on the Public/Traffic Safety Commission at the recent City Council meeting. 2. Harveston Specific Plan Circulation RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission receive and file a presentation regarding the Harveston Specific Plan Circulation. Via overheads, Director of Public Works Hughes provided an overview of the Harveston Specific Plan (per agenda material) which encompassed appreximately 550 acres of primarily residential and commercial areas; highlighted the specific location of the site, the proposed densities, the park plan, the 17.5 acre park and lake component, the school site, and the Service Commereial zone; relayed that, primarily, staff was of the opinion that this was a good project plan, noting the interior circulation with the loop street, and the three main access points to major routes; provided additional information regarding the main access off of Margarita Road, noting the original proposal to implement a one-way in, and one-way out, relaying the plan to include an amphitheater and alternate park sites in this area; noted staff's concern regarding this entry, relaying the applicants' redesign of the configuration, noting the modified plan to include a single more conventional two-way street; advised that an additional revision was made regarding the Date Street alignment; relayed that there were approximately 1920 units proposed in this project, noting the phasing plan, providing additional information regarding the four phases; relayed that there have been extensive traffic studies conducted with respect to this project, advising that the conditions related to traffic were being developed at this time; noted that the plan was inclusive of the applicant making improvements off-site in order to develop each phase, relaying that the off-site improvements were inclusive of the following: additional turning movements at Winchester Road and Margarita Road, additional lanes and turning movements at Ynez/Winchester Roads, additional improvements to the ramps at 1-15/Winchester Road, additional turning movements on Winchester Road/Jefferson Avenue, and additional improvements on Ynez Road/Overland Drive; noted that the previously mentioned improvements would need to be supplemented with the new interchange (the Cherry Street Interchange) which was in the planning stages, advising that the applicant would not be required to fund the interchange project, noting that the applicant would be building Date Street, and dedicating the necessary right-of-way needed for the ultimate interchange which would be a significant contribution. With respect to the design of the residential areas, Director of Public Works Hughes noted the plan to have the streets designed as short segments without long straight continuous routes, relaying that the configuration would slow vehicle speeds, noting that the Iccp road would handle the majority of the traffic; reiterated that staff was pleased with the pedestrian-friendly project plan; relayed that staff was supportive of the project, noting the revisions implemented to address previous concerns; and relayed that the applicant was proposing thirty-six foot (36') wide curb to curb streets which has been a topic of discussion between staff and the applicant, relaying that staff was of the opinion that it would be appropriate to widen the streets to the normal street standard of forty feet (40') curb to curb, advising that various Planning Commissioners and Councilmembers favor the narrower streets due to the aesthetic issues, and the thought that the narrower streets would slow traffic speeds. In response, Commissioner Edwards relayed that due to the windy configuration, the traffic speeds would be slow without the narrower streets. In response, Director of Public Works Hughes noted that this has been an ongoing issue, relaying that in the event that sidewalks are separated from the streets with parkways, that the City would solely permit this implementation if the applicant provides a maintenance mechanism in order to ensure that the parkways are maintained in a consistent manner, relaying that there would additionally be a requirement that the sidewalks be maintained by the HCA or the Special Service District that was created, providing additional information. For Commissioner Edwards, Director of Public Works Hughes relayed that the housing surrounding the lake was Medium Density housing. In response to Chairman Connerton, Senior Engineer Moghadam noted that the anticipated generation of traffic on Margarita Road would be approximately 30,000 vehicle trips a day which was inclusive of the impacts of development within the next five years. For Chairman Connerton, Director of Public Works Hughes relayed that with this project the developer would be responsible for the construction of Ynez Road through this project limits, noting that at the point where Ynez Road enters the Murrieta City limits, there was no condition requiring the applicant to build improvements in this area, advising that when Murrieta adopted its Circulation Element, accepting the City of Temecula's recommendation to bring the Date Street alignment to a new interchange location, Murrieta restricted this particular area until the freeway overcrossing was in place, clarifying that it was not anticipated that Ynez Road would be built north of the Temecula City limits for quite some time, advising that this was the rationale for the off- site improvements conditioned with this project, providing additional information; relayed that the new interchange project would be constructed in phases, specifying the City's proposed phases of construction, noting that the cost was an estimated $40 million, providing an approximate time schedule. In response to Chairman Connerton's comments, Commissioner Edwards relayed that it was her understanding that this project would have the greatest impact at the intersections, and not the arterial and collector roads, advising that the intersection improvements have been conditioned with this project. Director of Public Works Hughes confirmed Commissioner Edwards's comments, noting that with this project's traffic, four lanes on Margarita Road would be sufficient. For Chairman Connerton, Director of Public Works Hughes relayed that Margarita Road was identified as a 110' arterial road in the Circulation Element, advising that the rationale for this identification rather than an urban artedal designation was that the anticipated future volumes on this roadway were not forecasted to warrant a six-lane roadway, clarifying that the City could not condition a project beyond the parameters of the Cimulation Element, noting that this project was not the sole project contributing traffic to Margarita Road, advising that by law the City could not require this developer to mitigate all the surrounding developments' traffic impacts (per Government Code Section 66,000) Chairman Connerton noted his desire to avoid gridlock situations at a future point in time. In response, Director of Public Works Hughes relayed that if there was a requirement to provide the right-of-way on Margarita Road for provision of a six-lane road, the City could not enforce that condition on the project due to the previously mentioned designation of Margarita Road as an arterial road; relayed that the developer's dedication of the six lanes for the future interchange connection would significantly improve traffic in the City of Temecula, noting that this right-of-way was most likely the most needed right-of-way in the City of Temecula. In response, Chairman Connerton relayed that the City Council could require additional conditions on the project, noting his recommendation to be proactive with respect to traffic issues. For Chairman Connerton, Director of Public Works Hughes relayed that professional traffic engineers have conducted the studies and modeling that reveal that this project with the identified mitigation would not degrade Margarita Road to a Level of Service below Level D; advised that if it was foreseen that in 10-15 years the traffic was to increase, this particular project could not be required to mitigate for that impact due a lack of a nexus with the project; and provided additional information regarding the City Council requesting additional mitigation measures for a development. Senior Engineer Moghadam noted that, as mentioned, the impact of this project would be at the intersections, relaying the approach to require additional lanes at these locations, providing additional information regarding the revisions regarding the main access into the project. Director of Public Works Hughes relayed assurance that there were diligent efforts to ensure that each development mitigated its impacts. Chairman Connerton provided additional comments regarding the City Council imposing additional conditions on a project based on Commission comments. Chairman Connerton noted that the Commission would receive and file this information. 3. Procedures for Temporary Street Closure- RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission review and provide comments on the procedures for temporary street closures. Senior Engineer Moghadam relayed that per Commission request, staff has included in the agenda material a copy of various vehicle code sections, and the procedures for Temporary Street Closures for the Commission's review. For Chairman Connerton, Director of Public Works Hughes relayed that this policy was established by the City Council which designated the parties responsible for the appeal board; and provided an overview of the standard line of authority for an appeal, relaying that he was not aware of one appeal associated with this issue. In response to Commissioner Edwards, Director of Public Works Hughes advised that while a street closure matter was a fairly normal process, the closures were presented to the City Council for approval. Chairman Connerton relayed that the Commission would receive and file this data. 4. Criteria for Traffic Control Plans RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission review and provide input regarding the Traffic Control Plan criteria and Requirements. Senior Engineer Moghadam noted that this data (of record) was presented to the Commission for review, relaying that he was available for questions. Chairman Connerton relayed that the Commission would receive and file the information. TRAFFIC ENGINEER'S REPORT Senior Engineer Moghadam noted that per Commission request, there was an incident report regarding the 20 highest incident intersections for the Commission's review (per agenda material), providing additional information with respect to future improvements associated with some of these intersections. Director of Public Works Hughes noted that per Commission request, staff has provided a list of the planning cases that are being processed by the City, relaying that the packet (per supplemental agenda material) encompassed approximately 640 cases that the City was in process with, in some manner. In response to Director of Public Works Hughes comments, Chairman Connerton clarified that it was not his desire to have the Public/Traffic Safety Commission' review in detail every planning case, but solely the larger projects that would have a greater impact on the community, noting that this information was extremely helpful. For Commissioner Edwards, Chairman Connerton relayed that the Commission would be receiving this data quarterly. Director of Public Works Hughes advised that the City Council has authorized staff to advertise for construction bids for the Margarita Road Widening and Improvement Project, specifically, for the first phase of improvements of Margarita Road from Highway 79 South up to Plo Pice Road, relaying that the project would cost an estimated $1,200,000, noting that the design of the next phase was additionally being developed (from Plo Pice Road to Pauba Road), relaying that in January this road would be under construction. For Chairman Connerton, Director of Public Works Hughes relayed the agenda items for the November 16, 2000 Public/Traffic Safety Commission meeting. Director of Public Works Hughes noted that the Red Light Camera Program was within this year's budget, noting the process of preparing proposals for the study to be conducted, inviting the Commission to provide input regarding items to be researched. For Commissioner Katan, Director of Public Works Hughes relayed that there would most likely be an independent firm hired to review the various companies that have the Red Light Camera Program, noting that at this time the study has not been conducted. POLICE CHIEF'S REPORT Police Sergeant DiMaggio provided clarification with respect to the traffic collision report, noting that traveling at an unsafe speed may or may not mean that the driver was traveling higher than the posted speeds, but that the driver was driving too fast for the conditions at the time the collision occurred; and additionally noted that very few accidents were caused from red light violations. With respect to the Race for the Cure Event, Police Sergeant DiMaggio noted that overall it was a successful event, thanking all those who participated. Police Sergeant DiMaggio relayed that on November 18t~ the City would hold the Public/Safety Expo Event. Noting the upcoming Christmas Parade, Police Sergeant DiMaggio relayed that there would be street closures for this event. With respect to the Police Chief's Report (via agenda material), Police Sergeant DiMaggio relayed that he was available for questions. For Chairman Connerton, Police Sergeant DiMaggio noted that he would provide information to him regarding the next Police checkpoint. Police Sergeant DiMaggio noted that Officer Hughes had had a minor motorcycle accident and would be back to neighborhood enforcement next week. FIRE CHIEF'S REPORT Battalion Chief Ritchey noted that he was available for questions regarding the Fire Chief's Report (per agenda material). For Chairman Connerton, Battalion Chief Ritchey noted that the emergency response times could be provided to the Commission. With respect to the Public/Safety Expo, Battalion Chief Ritchey relayed that the Fire Department would be involved with this event inclusive of holding a breakfast. COMMISSION REPORTS Commissioner Katan noted that he had received an e-mail regarding the timing of the signal at Margarita/Winchester Roads, relaying that it was the residents' observation that when the daylight savings time changes the signal synchronization goes off. In response, Senior Engineer Moghadam relayed that he would address the issue with Caltrans, advising that the City signals have technology that adjust the signals for daylight savings time. With respect to the Police Checkpoint held on October 20, 2000, Commissioner Lanier relayed that attending the checkpoint had been informative, thanking the Police Department for the opportunity. Commissioner Lanier noted that a resident from a housing tract adjacent to the Crowne Hill Development had relayed that when exiting on De Portola Road, looking north off of Butterfield Stage Road, that there were visibility impacts due to the trees located in this area. For Commissioner Edwards, Police Sergeant DiMaggio relayed that there were vehicle code restrictions regarding the use of motorized scooters, noting that an individual was required to be 16 years of age, that if the area was not a 25 MPH zone, the scooter needed to be ridden in the bicycle lane, and that the rider was required to wear a helmet. Chairman Connerton relayed that at the recent City Council meeting, there were discussions related to having the Public/Traffic Safety Commission review crosswalk safety and the feasibility of painting the crosswalks a different color; noted that Mayor Stone Additionally recommended that the Public/Traffic Safety Commission review the Stop Light Abuse program (SLAP); and relayed that the City Council recommended having the four motor officers have a major presence at the intersections, noting that while visiting the major intersections, he was almost hit at the Ynez/Rancho California Roads on Monday, October 23, 2000. With respect to the Race for the Cure Event, Chairman Connerton applauded the Police Department for a job well done. For informational purposes, Chairman Connerton relayed that he had been invited to attend the Border Patrol Citizen's Academy, noting that the experience had been extremely informative; recommended that if granted the opportunity, that the Commissioners attend; and noted that the Border Patrol applauded the Temecula Police Department for their fine work. ADJOURNMENT At 8:47 P.M. Chairman Connerton formally adjourned this meeting to Thursday, November 16, 2000 at 6:00 P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula. Chairman Darrell L. Connerton Administrative Secretary Anita Pyle MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION NOVEMBER 16, 2000 CALL TO ORDER The City of Temecula Public/Traffic Safety Commission convened in a regular meeting at 6:00 P.M., on Thursday, November 16, 2000, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. FLAG SALUTE The audience was led in the Flag salute by Commissioner Lanier. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Coe, Edwards, Katan, Lanier, and Chairman Connedon. Absent: None. Also Present: Director of Public Works Hughes, Senior Engineer Moghadam, Associate Engineer Gonzalez, Police Sergeant DiMaggio, Administrative Secretary Pyle, and Minute Clerk Hansen. PUBLIC COMMENTS Mr. Scott Eggum, 41833 Cadeton Way, noted his previous request relayed at the September 14, 2000 Public/Traffic Safety Commission meeting to have the Commission address the negative traffic impacts in the Promenade Housing tract; noted that at the October Public/Traffic Safety Commission meeting which he was unable to attend (due to his daughter being in the hospital) that the Commission had denied a request for the closure of Winwood circle; clarified that the residents had been primarily interested in receiving a recommendation with respect to solutions to the traffic impacts in this area; queried whether the Public/Traffic Safety Commission could re-agendize this matter in order to consider feasible solutions; noted that his wife was involved in a near head-on collision in this area on November 15, 2000; specified the issues of concern, as follows: 1) that this particular area was being utilized for access for the Woodcrest tract, noting the narrow street widths, and 2) that there was concern regarding the speed of vehicles accessing the Margarita Road entry into the tract. For Mr. Eggum, Chairman Connerton relayed that the above-mentioned issues were addressed at the October Public/Traffic Safety Commission meeting when this matter was agendized, advising that the Promenade housing tract was designed to be utilized for access for the adjacent tract development, relaying that the significant curves in the roads served as a traffic calming tool; and noted that during the discussion of the agenda items for tonight's meeting, alternate traffic solutions would be discussed. R:ltrafficminutesll 11600 I For Chairman Connerton, Senior Engineer Moghadam relayed that the signage making drivers aware of the Margarita Road access into this tract would most likely be installed within a week's time period. In response to Mr. Eggum, Chairman Connerton relayed that this area does not warrant the installation of a stop sign; and noted that Mr. Eggum could obtain the minutes from the October meeting via the City's website, when available. (It was noted that the following comments by Mr. Wedel were actually heard after Agenda item No. 1 due to the confusion with respect to the request to speak form data.) Mr. Mark Wedel, 41522 Temeku Drive, provided additional information regarding the Temeku Drive area, noting the high speed of vehicles on this street; requested that the radar trailer be placed at this location; expressed gratitude to the Police Department for the increased enforcement (prior to Officer Hughes short leave to due a minor motor cycte accident), noting the effectiveness of his presence at the site; and for Commissioner Coe, noted that Officer Hughes was a tremendous asset with respect to improving community relations. For Mr. Wedel, Commissioner Edwards advised that Temeku Drive would most likely be positively effected when Meadows Parkway goes through. For Chairman Connerton, Police Sergeant DiMaggio confirmed that he would place a radar trailer in this area; and relayed that the Police Department was in the process of purchasing technology that would enable the radar trailer to record the time and the speed of vehicles. COMMISSION BUSINESS 1. North General Kearny Road Traffic Concerns RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission receive the report and provide direction to staff. Senior Engineer Moghadam provided an overview of the staff report (of record), updating the Commission with respect to the Stage I implementation of the Traffic Calming Program in the North General Kearny Road area which consisted of installation of the radar trailer, enforcement, and a neighborhood meeting to discuss the issues of concern; relayed that on August 28, 2000 a neighborhood meeting was held, noting the topics of discussion, as follows: the feasibility of closing the street, installing stop signs at four locations on North General Kearny Road, and installation of signage denoting the fines for speed violations; advised that the signs (denoting the fines) were installed, noting that Police Sergeant DiMaggio could provide an update regarding the effectiveness of the signage; with respect to stop sign installations, relayed that none of the four intersections met the criteria warranting stop sign installation; provided additional information regarding stop signs that have been installed in alternate neighborhoods, noting the ineffectiveness of stop signs to slow speed; with respect to road closure, noted that this was not staff's recommendation and would mostly likely not be considered a viable solution by the residents or the City Council; and advised that staff recommended that continued enforcement be implemented to whatever extend feasible, as the effective solution to the traffic issues in this area, noting that eighty-five percent (85%) of the drivers in this area are driving at speeds of 32 MPH and below. For Commissioner Lanier, PoLice Sergeant DiMaggio noted that Officer Hughes (the Neighborhood Enforcement Motor Officer) was out due to injuries sustained in a motorcycle accident for approximately a three-week period. Commissioner Coe queried the manner in which the Public/Traffic Safety Commission could reconcile the difference between the data in neighborhoods, which revealed that the speeding and volumes of vehicles were not significant impacts, and the residents' perception that these impacts were viable concerns. In response to Coe, Commissioner Edwards relayed that in the Via Cordoba area the residents residing proximate to the recently installed stop signs were of the opinion that the installations were effective, while the residents residing further distances from the stop signs viewed the installations as ineffective due to the drivers not slowing their speeds. Chairman Connerton reiterated that data has revealed that stop signs are ineffective at reducing speeds, providing additional information regarding the perception of residents. Senior Engineer Moghadam further commented, siting the Calle Medusa area where there were numerous stop signs, noting that at this time residents are requesting alternate solutions for traffic calming, advising that at a certain point in time residents typically concur with the ineffectiveness of the stop signs to control speed. Commissioner Coe relayed that it would be beneficial if the public could be educated with respect to the ineffectiveness of stop signs to slow traffic speeds. Ms. Cindy Mathes, 39797 North General Kearny Road, relayed that the greatest negative impact with respect to traffic in this area was due to the school traffic; noted the residents futile efforts to have the School Principal distribute a letter regarding the traffic issues. For Ms. Mathes, Chairman Connerton relayed that if he was provided with a copy of the letter that he would address the issue with School Officials. Ms. Mathes relayed that the combination of the distribution of the letter, the installation of the signage denoting fines, and the increased enforcement would aid in addressing the traffic issues. For Ms. Mathes, Commissioner Edwards relayed that the Drive 25, Keep Kids Afive Program was still being investigated and would be addressed by the Public/Traffic Safety Commission at a future point in time. Chairman Connerton advised Ms. Mathes that she could call any of the Public/Traffic Safety Commissioners with her concerns. The Commission relayed closinq remarks, as follows: Referencing the recent seminar he attended, Commissioner Lanier advised that enforcement and education am the most effective tools for addressing residential traffic concerns; empathized with the residents on North General Kearny Road who have continually made efforts to have their concerns addressed, suggesting that at a future point in time when the Drive 25, Keep Kids Alive Program was implemented that this neighborhood would be an appropriate location to test the program. Concurring with Commissioner Lanier, Commissioner Edwards relayed that this location would be an ideal area for implementing the Drive 25, Keep Kids Alive Program when it was in place; reiterated the numerous implementations the City has installed in various locations that have been ineffective at slowing speeds (i.e., traffic circles, stop signs, speed undulations), concurring that enforcement was the most effective tool; and advised that the Public/Traffic Safety Commission should continue to recommend that additional Motor Officers be added to the Police Department. Commissioner Katan concurred that enforcement would be the most effective solution for this area. For Commissioner Katan, Senior Engineer Moghadam relayed that Stage II of the program included installation of traffic calming tools such as stop signs, and speed undulations; and noted that the Drive 25, Keep Kids Alive Program would be part of the Stage I Program. Director of Public Works Hughes advised that the data regarding the Keep Kids Alive Program would be presented to the Commission in December. Commissioner Coe referenced a newspaper article, noting that a Councilmember had recommended that the Public/Traffic Safety Commission be involved in neighborhood seminars and alternate local formats, concurring with the need in the community for education. Confirming that the City Council was in favor of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission becoming more involved in the community, Chairman Connerton noted that he had had discussions with a Councilmember; with respect to the North General Kearny Road area, recommended that enforcement in this area be increased, recommending that this body forward a recommendation to the City Council for the addition of three additional Neighborhood Motor Officers for residential enforcement only. MOTION: Commissioner Edwards moved to recommend that the City Council consider the feasibility of adding three additional Motor Officers to the Police Department for the purpose of neighborhood enforcement. Commissioner Coe seconded the motion. (Ultimately this motion was amended; see page 5.) For Commissioner Lanier, Police Sergeant DiMaggio provided additional information regarding the existing Police Department staff, advising that with the addition of two Motor Officers and the addition of an additional Accident Investigation Vehicle that it would make it feasible to increase neighborhood enforcement. AMENDED MOTION: Commissioner Edwards moved to recommend that the City Council consider the feasibility of the addition of two Police Motor Officers, and the addition of an additional Accident Investigation Vehicle in order to effectively increase enforcement in the neighborhoods. Commissioner Coe seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. 2. Request for Traffic SiRnal - Nicolas Road at North General Kearny Road RECOMMENDATION: That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission deny the request for installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Nicolas Road and North General Kearny Road. Senior Engineer Moghadam presented the staff report (of record), highlighting the criteria, justifying placement of a traffic signal, relaying that none of the criteria at this location warrants the installation of a traffic signal. Chairman Connerton noted his disagreement with staff's recommendation to deny the request for a traffic signal at this location due to the traffic counts in excess of 5,000 trips within a short period of time (four hours); and provided additional information regarding the disregard of the stop sign at the school crossing area; and relayed that traffic would increase in this area when Meadows Parkway was opened. For Commissioner Edwards, Senior Engineer Moghadam confirmed that this signal would be placed on the City's traffic signal priority list, confirming that at a future point traffic volumes on this street will increase, providing additional information regarding the intersections in this area which may be signalized at a future point in time; and for Chairman Connerton, clarified that the priority level of a signal would be established and then funding for those specific signals would be determined by the City Council. MOTION: Commissioner Coe moved to approve staff's recommendation to deny the request for installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Nicolas Road/North General Kearny Road. Commissioner Edwards seconded the motion and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Commissioners Connerton and Katan who voted 3. Request for Multi-Way Stop Controls - Nicolas Road at Roripau.qh Road RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission deny the request for Multi-Way Stop Controls at the intersection of Nicolas Road and Roripaugh Road. Senior Engineer Moghadam provided an overview of the staff report (via agenda material), highlighting the warrants for justifying Multi-Way Stop controls; advised that an important factor in the establishment of a Multi-Way Stop was for the traffic on both streets to be equal, or near equal; noted the proximate safe signalized crossings in this area; and clarified that the criteria for this installation at this location has not been met. Additional discussion ensued regarding the location of school crossing guards. Chairman Connerton clarified the rationale for requesting that this issue be agendized, noting that children are crossing in an unsafe manner in this area, and his desire to have additional information regarding the traffic counts. Commissioner Coe noted his reluctance to place unwarranted stop signs in the City, relaying some of the dangers associated with an unwarranted stop sign. MOTION: Commissioner Coe moved to approve staff's recommendation to deny the request for a Multi-Way Stop Control at this location. Commissioner Lanier seconded the motions. (Ultimately this motion passed; see below.) Commissioner Katan relayed the Commission's recent charge to recommend safe routes for children to access the school sites, noting that in his opinion a safe route was not being provided at this location; advised that children would not travel a long distance to cross at safer crossings; and relayed that this was an opportunity for the Commission to be proactive with respect to the children's safety. Commissioner Coe, echoed by Commissioner Edwards, noted the dangers of installing an unwarranted stop sign. Chairman Connerton specified that it was approximately 500 yards from Roripaugh Road to Winchester Road, as well as, to North General Kearny Road, advising that the children would utilize the shorter path; noted that the stop sign would provide the Police Department the ability to enforce vehicles stopping at this location; and recommended that the Commission discuss interim solutions until this stop sign was warranted, referencing the charge of the Commission to site safe routes to school for the children. Director of Public Works Hughes clarified that safe routes to the schools were addressed, advising that staff was not recommending that Roripaugh Road route be utilized as a safe pedestrian route; relayed that the warrant analysis included the proximity to the schools and the number of pedestrians, reiterating that this intersection did not warrant a Multi-Way Stop Control; acknowledging that the City could not control pedestrian patterns (whether one opts to cross at a less safe crossing), noted that it the City was to endorse the installation of stop signs at these numerous unwarranted locations, then the City would be contributing to the negative driver problems. Commissioner Edwards concurred with Director of Public Works Hughes, noting that with this installation, 10,000 vehicles would be required to stop at an intersection unnecessarily; and relayed that the Commission has provided the students with safe alternatives. Chairman Connerton relayed the benefits of reviewing this data. Commissioner Coe noted the importance of the community residents making wise choices to cross where it is safer, noting that the Commission could not legislate this concept. Senior Engineer Moghadam noted that this was one of the few intersections in the City which staff has not received any complaints. At this time voice vote was taken reflecting unanimous approval. 4. Signalized Intersection Enforcement RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission receive the report and provide direction to staff. Director of Public Works Hughes relayed that the City Council has requested that the Public/Traffic Safety Commission review feasible options to minimize the red light violations at the major City intersections; with respect the to Red Light Camera Enforcement program, noted that the City Council has budgeted to have a consultant hired to investigate the available options; provided additional information regarding the negative issues associated with the use of the Red Light Camera Enforcement in alternate cities, noting that staff would bring a report forward to the Public/Traffic Safety Commission at a future meeting; and relayed that if it was the desire for the Public/Traffic Safety Commission to have alternate concepts investigated that staff would assist in that process. For Commissioner Coe, Director of Public Works Hughes relayed that the various options regarding the Red Light Camera Enforcement Program would be investigated by the consultant; and specified that there was a Red Light Camera located in the City of Indian Wells at Fred Waring Drive. in response to Commissioner Edwards, Director of Public Works Hughes relayed that if the City opted to implement the Red Light Camera Program each movement monitored would necessitate the need for an additional camera. Commissioner Edwards noted that in her opinion the greatest impact needing to be addressed was the red light left turn violations. In response, Senior Engineer Moghadam relayed that the camera enforcement could be utilized for turning movement violations. For Commissioner Coe, Director of Public Works Hughes clarified the request of the City Council regarding this Agenda Item. For Commissioner Katan, Director of Public Works Hughes noted that approximately $35,000 was allocated for this particular study (i.e., Red Light Camera Survey). For Commissioner Katan, Police Sergeant DiMaggio noted that one new motorcycle would cost approximately $12,500, relaying that the costs of the schooling to train an Officer would be $1500, noting that the Officer would need to outfitted with gear which would bring the total cost to approximately $20,000-25,000. Commissioner Katan queried whether the City could fund one additional Police motorcycle rather than one additional survey, noting that there was concurrence within the Commission that enforcement would be the most appropriate action with respect to red light violations. Chairman Connerton noted that the agenda material regarding this issue was extremely thorough, commending staff; relayed that this data served to answer questions that he had had; provided additional information regarding the automated enforcement issues associated with the Red Light Camera Enforcement program, and the data regarding the associated negative impacts of red light violations; recommended that there be an additional six-to-eight Officers brought in to the City of Temecula from time to time for targeting rod light violations at major intersections for specified periods of time which would provide an immediate solution to the red light violations; recommended that concurrently, there be a community outreach program designed to educate the residents with rogard to the serious negative impacts associated with running red lights; recommended that the study continue to determine the viability of the Red Light Camera Program, and that the data be presented to the Public/Traffic Safety Commission; and advised that during the 30-day warning period associated with the Red Light Camera Enforcement Program that the individuals who receive warnings be required to attend a traffic safety class. For Chairman Connerton, Director of Public Works Hughes relayed that in four-to-five months the data would most likely be completed regarding the Red Light Camera Program. For Commissioner Edwards, Chairman Connerton relayed that the City Council has the ability to temporarily hire Police Officers for specified periods of time, noting his discussions with City and Police Officials; and advised that the fines for the red light violations cannot be increased, relaying that these fines are determined by the State. Director of Public Works Hughes noted that the rod light violations were a problem nationwide, noting that the fines were not deterring the violations effectively; and advised that it may be a viable concept to make efforts to contact legislators requesting that the fines be increased. In response, Commissioner Coe relayed that there was not an adequate number of repeat violators for the higher fines to be effective; and relayed that enforcement was the greatest deterrent. Police Sergeant DiMaggio relayed that red light violation enforcement was one of the most dangerous tasks of the Police Department, providing additional information; and with respect to the concept of bringing in additional Officers from alternate cities, noted the issues associated with this recommendation (i.e., liability issues). Chairman Connerton commented on the charge of the Commission to make recommendations, noting that the City Council could make modifications. Commissioner Edwards recommended that the Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommend increased enforcement and not specify the manner in which the increased enforcement was attained. For Commissioner Lanier, Police Sergeant DiMaggio advised that for court purposes it was preferred that the Officer visually see the red light that the violator passed through; and. provided additional information regarding the negative issues associated with Reserve Officers viewing the violation and subsequently calling an alternate Officer to cite the violator. Commissioner Edwards concurred with Chairman Connerton's recommendation to increase enforcement and to continue the study associated with the Red Light Camera Enforcement. For Commissioner Edwards, Chairman Connerton relayed that individuals could relay their request that traffic fines be raised to their legislators. For Chairman Connerton, Director of Public Works Hughes noted that the Commission's desire for additional Officers could be relayed to Police Chief Domenoe for his recommendation as to an adequate enforcement plan. Chairman Connerton noted that the City Council desired a recommendation expeditiously. For Commissioner Edwards, Director of Public Works Hughes relayed that staff could discuss the issue with Police Officials and still present the recommendation to the City Council in December. Chairman Connerton relayed that he recommended the addition of six-to-eight Officers as soon as possible, noting that ultimately the Officers would be needed for the Vail Ranch annexation. For Commissioner Coe, Director of Public Works Hughes relayed that the Red Light Camera Study would be conducted per City Council direction. Commissioner Coe relayed that it was his opinion that the Police Department Officials, with their expertise, should determine the number of Officers needed for increased red light enforcement. Director of Public Works Hughes reiterated the Public/Traffic Safety Commission's previous recommendation regarding Agenda Item No. 1 for the addition of Police Officers for neighborhood enforcement, noting that it may be the Commission's desire to have a percentage of these Officers' time spent on red light enforcement. Chairman Connerton relayed that the Commission had an opportunity to make a recommendation at the request of the City Council, reiterating that the City Council could modify the recommendation. Commissioner Katan relayed that since the Public/Traffic Safety Commission was requested to provide a recommendation that it was his opinion that it should be specific and reflect the Commission's concept of a viable solution. MOTION: Commissioner Edwards moved to recommend that the City Council consider the following: to hire additional Officers, as deemed necessary, to adequately mitigate red light violations; to investigate a protocol to increase the costs of traffic fines; to continue to investigate the feasibility of the Red Light Camera Enforcement Program; and to establish an outreach program to educate the public with respect to safety at intersections. Commissioner Lanier seconded the motion. (Ultimately this motion was amended; see page 10.) Commissioner Lanier noted that if the Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommended a specified amount of additional Officers it would clarify the Commission's direction, For Coe, Commissioner Edwards provided avenues, which could be utilized, for the recommended community outreach program. Chairman Connerton noted that if the City R:\trafficminutesll 11600 9 Council approved the program the matter would most likely be directed to the Public/Traffic Safety Commission for additional specificity. Director of Public Works Hughes offered that the Public/Traffic Safety Commission could request that there be a budgeted item prepared for the Public/Traffic Safety Commission to utilize for the outreach program. Chairman Connerton queried whether Commissioner Edwards desired to amend the motion to include the budget issue associated with the outreach program. AMENDED MOTION: Commissioner Edwards moved to recommend that the City Council consider the following: to hire additional Officers, as deemed necessary, to adequately mitigate red light violations; to investigate a protocol to increase the costs of traffic fines; to continue to investigate the feasibility of the Red Light Camera Enforcement Program; and to establish an outreach program to educate the public with respect to safety at intersections, and for the City Council to identify funding for such a program. Commissioner Lanier seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. TRAFFIC ENGINEER'S REPORT Senior Engineer Moghadam noted the inclusion of the traffic count data on the City's major streets in comparison to the last three-year's counts at the same locations. POLICE CHIEF'S REPORT Police Sergeant DiMaggio noted the light phasing program in Mexico, noting the flashing light prior to phasing to the next color (i.e., flashing green light prior to phasing to a yellow light). In response, Senior Engineer Moghadam provided additional information regarding the likely ineffectiveness of the flashing lights, noting that he had no knowledge of any standards in the State of California regarding this implementation. For informational purposes, Police Sergeant DiMaggio relayed that the Police Department would be holding a DUI Checkpoint on November 17, 2000 at 7:00 P.M., noting that there would be red light enforcement between 4:30-7:00 P.M. Police Sergeant DiMaggio noted that the City's Electric Light Parade would be held on December 1,2000. Chairman Connerton relayed that the Promenade Mall's Christmas Tree Lighting Ceremony would be held on November 17, 2000; and noted that the City's Tree Lighting Ceremony and the Electric Light Parade would both be held on December 1st at different locations. FIRE CHIEF'S REPORT No comments. R:\trafficminutesll 11600 1 0 COMMISSION REPORTS For Commissioner Katan, Senior Engineer Moghadam relayed that the PubiicFFraffic Safety Commission could be provided the current priority list of traffic signals. Commissioner Katan commended Mayor Pro Tern Comerchero and the RTA for the .25 fee for bus transportation for shopping during the Christmas season, recommending that efforts continue towards providing bussing for school transportation. Commissioner Katan noted that he attended the Community POP Team meeting, relaying that it was a well-attended, informative event. For informational purposes, Commissioner Lanier noted that he had attended the Police Department's Children Identification Program, which was held at the Home Depot site. With respect to the recent traffic workshop seminar he attended, Commissioner Lanier noted that it had been informational, relaying that a concept had been offered to utilize honor students at school pick-up and drop-off zones. Commissioner Edwards, echoed by Chairman Connerton, relayed that the Safety Exposition would be held this weekend at Chaparral High School, noting that there would be breakfast from 7:30 A.M. to 10:00 A.M. With respect to his past experience attending the traffic workshop seminars, Commissioner Coe noted the benefit to the City of Temecula in that there were still opportunities to make a positive impact with respect to traffic issues while in alternate cities it was too late to be as effective. For informational purposes, Commissioner Coe relayed that he would be involved in a musical drama held at the Temeku Hill Clubhouse on Friday, November 17th at 8:00 P.M. and on Sunday, November 20th at 2:00 P.M. With respect to the recent traffic seminar workshop, Chairman Connerton relayed that he had gained a plethora of information; and concurred with Commission Coe, that alternate cities were dealing with worsened traffic conditions. ADJOURNMENT At 8:25 P.M. Chairman Connerton formally adjourned this meeting to Thursday, December 14, 2000 at 6:00 P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula. Chairman Darrell L. Connerton Administrative Secretary Anita Pyle R:\trafficminutesll 11600 11 ITEM NO. 2 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: AGENDA REPORT Public/Traffic Safety Commission Ali Moghadam, P.E., Senior Engineer, Traffic February 22, 2001 Item 2 Emergency Transportation Circulation Plan (ETCP) DISCUSSION: ETCP Subcommittee discussion of recent meeting. CITY OF TEMECULA Ad Hoc Transportation Committee February 15, 2001 RECOMMENDATIONS TO PUBLIC TRAFFIC/SAFETY COMMISSION 1. Augment City of Temecula website to include comprehensive transportation information- "Transportation Solutions" 2. Work with CalTrans to acquire additional "Rideshare" information signs for I- 15 on/off ramps within City limits 3. Include "Transportation Element" in upcoming Temecula General Plan revision. This element would include Rideshare, (including Park 'N' Ride lots), transit planning, and trail planning which would complement the traffic circulation element. 4. Review of General Plan revisions by Temecula Public Traffic/Safety Commission 5. City to continue to address transportation issues through development agreements, specific plans as well as General Plan revisions/updates 6. Establish name of ad hoc subcommittee as "Temecula Transportation Sub- committee" WORK IN PROGRESS 1. City/TVUSD/RTA collaboration to conduct survey at Temecula's high schools to gather input for a "Smart Shuttle" program. Survey to be drafted by RTA and conducted by TVUSD. Expected completion date of late March-early April, 2001 2. Coordinate efforts with RTA to provide transportation to County/City of San Diego 3. Collect information on extending HOV lanes on I-15, north of San Diego 4. Grant applications to State/Federal agencies to fund Temecula Rideshare program 5. Explore conducting survey to assess Rideshare needs in Temecula/Mun'ieta. Data collected could be utilized to: · Update Temecula General Plan Transportation Element · Restructure current RTA routes throughout the Temecula/Murtieta area · Conduct city-wide public transportation education program ITEM NO. 3 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: AGENDA REPORT Public/Traffic Safety Commission Ali Moghadam, P.E., Senior Engineer, Traffic February 22, 2001 Item 3 Public/Traffic Safety Commission Meeting Schedule Revision RECOMMENDATION: That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission consider the feasibility of holding one regularly scheduled meeting per month. BACKGROUND: At the meeting of March 11, 1999, the Public/Traffic Safety Commission considered and approved holding two (2) regularly scheduled meetings on the second and fourth Thursday of each month. The purpose of the second monthly meeting was to address and expedite implementation of the selected short-term traffic circulation improvement projects. The second meeting also provided an opportunity to review related circulation issues and other neighborhood traffic safety issues requiring immediate attention. The short-term circulation improvement projects have been completed and other traffic circulation and safety issues are being addressed in a timely manner. At the meeting of September 14, 2000, the Public/Traffic Safety Commission considered the feasibility of revising the meeting schedule to one regularly scheduled meeting per month. Following a lengthy discussion, the Commission moved to maintain the present two meeting per month schedule until January 2001, when the issue could be revisited. Staff is recommending that the Public/Traffic Safety Commission consider holding one (1) regularly scheduled meeting per month. Should an issue arise that requires immediate attention, the Commission has the option to schedule a special meeting to address the issue. FISCAL IMPACT: None Attachments: Exhibit "A" Minutes of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission Meeting - September 14, 2000 I r:\traffic\commissn~agenda~200 l\0222~meetingschcdul¢ EXHIBIT "A" MINUTES OF THE PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION MEETING SEPTEMBER 14, 2000 the Commission to make a recommendation to the City Council. In response, Senior Engineer Moghadam relayed that the issue could be agendized for a November Commission meeting. 3. Limit Line for Yellow Change Interval at Siqnalized Intersections RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission review and provide input regarding limit line for yellow change interval at signalized intersections. Senior Engineer Moghadam provided an overview of the staff report (as per agenda material), relaying that this issue had been agendized due to a request from the Commission to review the feasibility of installing a limit line prior to signalized intersections in order to provide drivers an indication mark to determine whether or not a vehicle would have sufficient time to go through the intersection without violating the red light; noted that after additional reseamh, staff noted that there were no other jurisdictions utilizing this type of application; and advised that the disadvantages of installing the application outweighed the benefits, reiterating that the application had not been utilized, noting the liability issues, and relaying the variables of the placement of the limit line associated with the speed and volume of traffic. The Commission concurred with staff's findings, Commissioner Coe commenting on the potential danger of additional rear-end type accidents with the use of the application. Additional discussion ensued regarding potential dangers associated with the use of this application. Chairman Connerton relayed that since this was a receive and file issue, no further action would be taken by the Commission. 4. Public/Traffic Safety Commission Meetlnq Schedule Revision RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission consider the feasibility of holding one (1) regularly scheduled Commission meeting per month. Director of Public Works Hughes presented the staff report (of record), relaying the original rationale for the proposed schedule to hold two regularly scheduled monthly meetings for the Public/Traffic Safety Commission, noting the selected short-term traffic circulation improvement projects that required immediate attention, advising that those particular projects have all been completed; relayed that due to the lack of current action items necessitating two monthly meetings, staff was requesting input from the Commission regarding holding one regularly scheduled meeting per month, noting that in staff's opinion the issues could be adequately served with one monthly meeting; and advised that numerous hours of staff time were expended each time a Commission meeting was scheduled. Chairman Connerton relayed that the Commission had made previous requests to review certain items (i.e., the review of tract maps), but that due to time constraints had been unable to do so; and noted that if the meetings were scheduled for twice a month, that a meeting could be cancelled more easily than scheduling an additional Special meeting. Relaying that he was not opposed to scheduling the meetings once a month, Commissioner Katan noted that the additional availability of the Commissioners could be utilized for opportunities to hear public concerns and/or to attend scheduled neighborhood public meetings, advising that if a regular neighborhood forum was held the residential comments could be heard and addressed. Commissioner Coe advised that in his opinion this Commission has been grossly underutilized, noting that there were numerous issues related to traffic that required addressing; noted that residents consistently brought forward to the Commission concerns regarding developmental impacts (i.e., the public comments expressed at tonight's meeting), relaying that it would be beneficial for the Public/Traffic Safety Commission to address these concerns pdor to development, at which time traffic circulation impacts could be mitigated more effectively by the Commission. Commissioner Lanier concurred with maintaining the currently scheduled two monthly meetings, noting that if a second meeting was deemed unnecessary that it could be canceled, relaying hopes that the Public/Traffic Safety Commission could be more effectively utilized. With respect to reviewing developmental projects prior to the Planning Commission's approval, Chairman Connerton relayed that the response to this request in the past by Deputy City Manager Thomhill had been that this review process was not required by Law and that the Planning Department would not recommend the additional review; and advised that in his opinion, it would be beneficial for the Public/Traffic Safety Commission to proactively address the circulation issues in order to forward recommendations to the Planning Commission for its consideration. Commissioner Coe concurred with the need to address potential negative traffic impacts prior to development, siting current development projects in the approval process at this time; and noted his frustration with respect to continually attempting to mitigate traffic impacts "after the fact." Chairman Connerton concurred with the previous Commission comments, reiterating that this Commission was underutilized. In response to the Commission concerns, Director of Public Works Hughes relayed that with respect to the Commission's desire for additional involvement in the planning process, that this suggestion had been previously explored, noting that it was not within the Public Works Department's purview to grant this formal review process to the Commission; noted that for informational purposes, a courtesy review of the development plans could be presented to the Commission, relaying that the Commission comments could be considered for incorporation into the Public Works Department's' Conditions of Approval for the project, clarifying that there would be no official action taken by the Commission. Chairman Connerton advised that it would be beneficial to have an additional formal review of the developmental circulation plans, noting the benefits of a supplementary review by five additional individuals (i.e., the Commissioners). Director of Public Works Hughes relayed that protocol was received via the City Council with respect to the charges of the Planning Commission and the Public/Traffic Safety Commission, advising that staff could bring the request to the City Council for direction regarding the Commission's desire to review Land Use Plans, clarifying that at this time staff did not have the jurisdiction to grant the request; and for Chairman Connerton, relayed that the issue could potentially be presented to the City Council in October. Chairman Connerton clarified that it was not his intention to imply that the Public Works Department was not doing excellent work, noting the desire to simply address traffic impacts at an eadier stage; relayed that the public member who spoke dudng the comment pedod at tonight's meeting brought forward to the Commiss. ion a new development of residential housing with undersized streets. In response, Director of Public Works Hughes advised that to the best of his knowledge the development plan (the Promenade housing tract) that was discussed were plans that had been approved prior to the City's incorporation, clarifying the direction the Public Works Departmental staff provide during the review process. Chairman Connerton relayed that previously approved Subdivision Tract Maps could be reviewed prior to development if it was determined to be an outdated map or if it would create future safety impacts. For Commissioner Katan, Senior Engineer Moghadam relayed that the Public Works Department thoroughly reviews the new development maps prior to approval. Director of Public Works Hughes relayed that typically the majority of conditions placed on a project originated from the Public Works Department, advising that a Public Works Department staff member was always in attendance and available for input and questions at the Planning Commission meetings when the Commission reviewed projects; advised that when expansive project plans'were presented to the Planning Commission, siting the Wolf Creek Project, that an extensive environmental review was conducted, relaying that approximately forty percent (40%) of the review regarding the Wolf Creek project was the review of traffic impacts inclusive of the impacts on the surrounding areas, relaying that the conditions on these type of projects were comprehensive. Chairman Connerton reiterated that the Public Traffic Safety Commission's comments regarding projects could be forwarded to the Planning Commission for its consideration. MOTION: Commissioner Coe moved to maintain the current meeting schedule until the first meeting in January, of 2001, when the issue could be brought back to the Commission. Commissioner Lanier seconded the motion and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Commissioner Edwards who was absent. In response to Senior Engineer Moghadam, the Commission relayed that if staff found it necessary to cancel a meeting, the current process was satisfactory. ITEM NO. 4 TRAFFIC ENGINEER'S REPORT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS Monthly Activity Report December 2000 / January 2001 Prepared By: Amer Attar Submitted by: William G. Hughes Date: January 23, 2001 PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION 1. First Street Bridge This project will construct First Street from Pujol Street to Old Town Front Street, including the construction ora bridge over Murrieta Creek and the realignment of Santiago Road. The new intersection of First Street, Old Town Front Street, and Santiago Road will be signalized. The bridge deck was poured and stressed with the removal of falsework underway. The asphalt paving on the westside of Front Street is complete with paving of thc eastside of Front Street and the southside of Santiago Road scheduled for the end of January. Installation of the RCWD 20" waterline is nearly complete. Construction of the EMWD lift station is continuing. Completion of this project is scheduled for March 2001. 2. Old Town Parking Lot This project will rehabilitate the Stampede parking lot. It includes resurfaeing, landscaping, and Old Town Series lights. TruGreen began construction on the parking lot on October 2, 2000. Construction of concrete light pole bases, curb, gutter and asphalt paving is complete. Old Town Series lights are on back-order and are scheduled to be installed by the end of January. 3. Pala Road Bridge Environmental Restoration/Median and Parkway Landscape Improvements This project will install landscape improvements along Pala Road and Cupeno Lane and restore the wetlands in the construction zone. It includes the installation of an irrigation system, planting, and hydroseeding. Construction on the median and parkway improvements began 12/4/00. The contractor is ~ompleting the installation of the irrigation system. Construction should be completed by February 2001. 4. Pala Road Bridge Environmental Mitigation The wetlands creation site located approximately 1 Va mile east of the bridge project has been planted and the five-year maintenance period began. 5. Pala Road Soundwalls Work on this project includes the construction of masonry block Soundwalls on Pala Road from west of Rainbow Canyon Road to east of Club House Drive. The wall averages 14' in height. Construction began 12/11/00. The wall footing has been poured and the blocks will begin going up the first week of February. R:\MonfldyActivityReport\CIP~2000\December 6. Sports Park Pond Desiltation The project will include the removal of 15,000 cubic yards of silt from the existing pond located along Rancho Vista Road. The contractor has completed the removal of 15,000 cubic yards of material from the de-siltation basin. Fencing will be installed around the basin and hydroseed will be placed on the basin slopes during the 3rd week of January. Project is scheduled for completion by the end of January 2001. 7. FY99-2000 Pavement Management System, Various Streets This is a new project to reconstruct roadway pavement on Yncz Road between Santiago Road and La Paz Street. Thc project is complete. City Council accepted this project and filed thc Notice of Completion at thc January 9, 2001 meeting 8. Rancho California Sports Park Field Lighting Under this project, new lights will be installed in all fields. Bids were opened on November 15, 2000. Lowest bidder is MEI with a bid of $494,990. Project was awarded at the November 28, 2000 Council meeting. Construction began on 12/11/00. PROJECTS BEING ADVERTISED FOR BIDS 1. Murrieta Creek Crossing Between Winchester and Rancho California Road- Low.flow Crossing at Via Montezuma This project will construct a low-flow crossing of Murrieta Creek connecting Diaz and Del Rio at Via Montezuma. This project is currently out to bid, with a bid opening date of January 30, 2001. Tom Dodson & Associates, an environmental consultant, has submitted the necessary applications for the permitting process. RCFCD is developing a cooperative agreement with the City for the construction and maintenance of the Low-Flow. We expect the draft to be sent to the City shortly. A meeting between the City and the RCFCD, Army Corps and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) took place on November 15, 2000. The City's Planning Department is in the process of completing the CEQA documentation. The Construction window is from September through March due to nesting season. 2. City Maintenance Facility Alterations, Phase III This project will modify the existing two story masonry block building to accommodate a new second floor of office space over the existing two-story maintenance bay, including the installation of an elevator, and two new second floor restrooms. Construction will also include a single story office space addition. Original bids will be rejected at 01/23/01 City Council meeting. Revised plans will be re-advertised for bids. The new bid opening date is set for February 20, 2001. PROJECTS IN DESIGN 1. Pavement Management System, Jefferson Avenue This project will rehabilitate Jefferson Avenue from the northerly City limits to Overland Drive. Areas to be rehabilitated were identified, and plans and specifications are being reviewed and completed. Design is about 90% complete. The Plans and Specifications should go out to bid in March 2001. 2 R:hMonthlyActivityReport\CIl~2000\December 2. Diaz Road Realignment Under this project, Diaz Road will be realigned to Vincent Moraga Road at Rancho California Road. Business Park Drive will be a T-intersection at Diaz. The designer is currently preparing the improvement plans for 90% submittal. The design is scheduled for completion by February 2001. 3. Margarita Road Widening, Pauba Road to Dartolo Road This project will widen Margarita Road from Plo Pico to Dartolo Road. We are also including the pavement rehabilitation of Phase II (Pauba Road to Plo Pico) as part of this phase of the project. Final street plans plan check returned to City on 0 !/09/01. Design completion is expected at the end of'January. Bidding is expected in February 2001. 4. Pala Road Improvements - Phase II (79 South to Pechanga Road) This project will widen Pala Road to its ultimate width from the Pala Road Bridge to Pechanga road. Plan check comments (70% Submittal) were returned to the consultant. Work is proceeding on the remainder of the design, which includes geotechnical, utility research, environmental, and final design. The approval Wolf Creek Drainage Basin Study by RCFC & WCD has been delayed about a month because hydrology studies upstream of, Wolf, Creek require prior approval. Staff will be using an appraiser to assist in the preparation of the real estate appraisal report. The project is f,unded for design only at this time. 5. Rancho California Road Median Modifications at Town Center and Adding a Right Turn Lane on Westbound Rancho Calif,ornia Road at Ynez The project will include the closing of the two median openings on Rancho California Road in front of the Town Center Drive, while lengthening the left mm lanes at Ynez Road, Town Center Drive, and Via Los Colinas. A new project to add a right turn lane on westbound Rancho California Road at Ynez is being combined with this project due to its close proximity and for efficiency. The project is currently in design. Right of way acquisition at the northeast comer of Rancho California and Ynez will be required. 6. Pauba Road Improvements - Phase II (Margarita Road to Showalter Road) This project will widen Pauba Road from Showalter to just west of Margarita Road to its ultimate width. The design process has begun and the work is being coordinated with design of the library project. 70% design plans were submitted to the City and were sent out to all utilities and other City departments f,or review. Staff will begin negotiations with property owners to discuss driveway revisions and new easements. Potholing utilities has been performed along Pauba to determine elevations of existing lines. 7. Senior Center Expansion The expansion will include an addition of 3000 square feet to the existing building. The expansion will be for recreational, office, and meeting purposes. The project is currently undergoing second plan check review. 8. Rancho California Road Bridge Widening Over Murrieta Creek This project will widen Rancho California Bridge over Mumeta Creek to provide additional traffic lanes. Design of the project began in September 2000. Design will take six months. The bridge widening will include four additional lanes. Submittal of 30% drawings is scheduled for the end of January 2001 for staff review. 3 R:\MonthlyActivityReport\CIPk20~0\December 9. Chaparral High School Swimming Pool The design committee decided upon the layout of the 25-yard x 25-meter pool at Chaparral High School. · The facility will include a smaller recreation pool component and a bathhouse with locker room facilities, restrooms and showers. Spray-type play equipment will be included in the construction bid as an alternate. The design concept was completed. First design submittal i's being reviewed by the City and TVUSD. 10. Starlight Ridge Southern Cross Road Sidewalk Project This Project will install approximately one mile of sidewalk on the northwest side of Southern Cross Road. Field survey is scheduled to be completed by January 30, 2001. Basemap preparation and design arc underway. 11. Rancho California Sports Park Culvert Redesign In this project, the existing culvert will need to be modified to eliminate a slope erosion problem. Final plans, specifications and cost estimate are complete. TCSD has completed their 2nd review and their comments have been incorporated. We are awaiting final review and the environmental assessment from the Planning Department. This project should be advertised for bids in February. 12. Traffic Signal installation at Stonewood and Margarita In this project, a traffic signal will be installed on Margarita,Road at Stonewood Drive. Consultant is work on final plan check comments and expects to submit final plans and specification by the end of January 2001. Advertisement for bids is expected in February. 13. Pavement Management System - Citywide This project will involve rehabilitating various streets in the City for FY 2000-01. A list of streets has been selected and staff is currently preparing the contract documents. In addition, the Pavement management System Program (PMS) for the City will be updated. 14. Margarita Road/Winchester Road Intersection Improvements Under this project, an additional left turn from eastbound Winchester to northbound Margarita will be added to accommodate increasing traffic. Design and construct a second east to north left turn at Margarita/Winchester intersection. Field survey is scheduled to be completed by January 26, 2001. Basemap preparation and design is underway. Project will be processed as a Caltrans Encroachment Permit. Coordination with Caltrans will be required since Winchester is a State route at this location. An 15. 1-15 Northbound On-Ramp Widening at Winchester Road This project will re-stripe the northbound on-ramp from westbound Winchester to I-15 to allow for a better flow of traffic. A consultant has completed a preliminary layout plan for the new lane configuration. A final striping plan is in the process of being prepared. The City will be applying for an Encroachment Permit from Caltrans. 16. Overland Drive Extension/Murrieta Creek Bridge This project will entail alignment studies and design of an extension of Overland Drive, westerly to Diaz 4 R:\MonthlyActivityReport\ClP~2000\December Road, which includes a new bridge over Murrieta Creek. On December 19, 2000, City Council approved the contract with Project Design Consultants to proceed with the design of Phase I, Alignment Study. The study consists of preparing an alignment study, initial environmental assessment, topographic base mapping, right- of-way research, and the preparation of preliminary cost estimates for the preferred alignment. The project includes the widening of Overland Drive from Jefferson Avenue to Commerce Center Drive, and the extension of Overland Drive across Murrieta Creek to Diaz Road. A kick off meeting was recently held and the study is underway. 17. Winchester Road Widening Between Enterprise Circle and Jefferson This project will add a right turn lane from eastbound Winchester to southbound Jefferson starting at Enterprise Circle. Preliminary utility research and data gathering is underway. Design survey RFP is scheduled to be completed by the end of the month. 18. AC Street Repairs - FY2001 This project will rehabilitate and reconstruct selected City streets during 2001. A list of streets has been selected and staff is currently preparing the contract documents. 19. Light Emitting Diode (LED) Traffic Signal Conversion Program A grant award was obtained in the amount of $140,870.00 to replace incandescent traffic signal lights with Light Emitting Diode (LED). Program grant agreement is in process of final execution. Project bidding is anticipated in February with implementation expected April-June 2001. 20. Pujol Street Sidewalk Improvements - Phase H This project will complete the knuckle at the intersection of Sixth Street and Felix Valdez. Data gathering, concept review, preliminary layout is underway. 21. Landscaping and Sidewalk On 79 South (Front Street to Pala Road) The project consists of the design and construction of new sidewalk and landscaping along the south side of State Highway 79 South between Pala Road and Old Town Front Street. Data gathering, concept review, preliminary layout is underway. 22. Temecula Library A full service library, approximately 34,000 square feet in area, will be designed and built on Pauba Road, just west of Fire Station #84. This project will provide the community with library resources and services. The design is progressing on schedule. The architect started on the final drawings after the committee completed its design and development meetings. The State Librarian is holding Public Hearings that include all agencies to develop the guidelines for the approved Bond measure. Letters were sent to all the utilities requesting service information. Utility services construction will be coordinated with Pauba Road, Phase II street improvement project. 23. Street Name Sign Replacement This project will entail removing the existing wooden signs and replacing them with plastic signs selected by the Public Traffic Safety Commission. Information is being gathered. The preparation of Plans and 5 R:\MonthlyAcfivityReport\CIPX2000~December Specifications will start shortly. 24. Traffic Signals Design at Pala Road and Loma Linda, and at Pala Road and Wolf Valley Two new traffic signals will be installed on Pala Road, one at Loma Linda and the other at WolffValley. The plans and specifications are complete. The project is being coordinated with Pechanga Development Corporation sewer project. This project is on hold due to environmental constraints. 25. Pala Road Interim Improvements - (Widening to accommodate four lanes from Loma Linda Bridge to Wolf Valley) Pala Road Interim Improvements (58 feet in width) will be completed with the second phase of construction of the Pala Road Trunk Sewer (Pechanga Development Corporation project). An encroachment permit was issued for the construction of the trunk sewer and the interim street improvements. Traffic signal and striping plans are complete. The construction of Pala Road Trunk Sewer (Phase Two) by the Pechanga Development Corporation from Clubhouse Drive to the new Pechanga Casino Driveway (600 feet southeast of Wolf Valley Road) started November 6, 2000 and the approximate completion date is Spring 2001. The interim project is on hold due to environmental constraints. 26. Santa Gertrudis Bridge Widening at 1-15 This is Phase II of the Southbound Auxiliary Lane project at the southbound exit ramp for Winchester Road. This project will widen the 1-15 southbound exit-ramp at the Santa Gertrudis Creek Bridge to provide an additional lane on the exit ramp just north of Winchester Road. Consultant is working on 2nd plan check comments and expects to submit to RCFCD and Caltrans by the end of January. Staff is revisiting the merits of this project in light of the proposed Project Study Report for Cherry Street Interchange. The study shows that this bridge may have to be removed in the future to accommodate the Cherry Street Interchange. 27. Santiago Road/Ynez Road Intersection Improvements This project will widen, realign, and adjust the traffic signal timing of the existing intersection. This project has been delayed indefinitely. The Traffic Division will be doing some minor striping and signal adjustment that would minimize the em-rent problem. 6 R:~Montl~lyActivityReport\CIP~2000\December I.l.I tl.l <, > 0 0 MEMORANDUM TO: Bill Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer FROM: ~ Brad Buron, Maintenance Superintendent DATE: January 4, 2001 SUBJECT: Monthly Activity Report - December, 2000 The following activities were performed by Public Works Department, Street Maintenance Division in-house personnel for the month of December, 2000: I. SIGNS A. Total signs replaced 29 B. Total signs installed 10 C. Total signs repaired 8 I1. TREES A. Total trees trimmed for sight distance and street sweeping concerns 9 231 2 642 III. ASPHALT REPAIRS A. Total square feet of A. C. repairs B. Total Tons IV. CATCH BASINS A. Total catch basins cleaned VI. VII. RIGHT-OF-WAY WEED ABATEMENT A. Total square footage for right-of-way abatement GRAFFITI REMOVAL A. Total locations B. Total S.F. STENCILING A. 10 New and repainted legends B. -4)- L.F. of new and repainted red curb and striping 19 27571 Also, City Maintenance staff responded to 20 service order requests ranging from weed abatement, tree trimming, sign repair, A.C. failures, litter removal, and catch basin cleanings. This is compared to 26 service order requests for the month of November, 2000. The Maintenance Crew has also put in 123 hours of overtime which includes standby time, special events and response to street emergencies. The total cost for Street Maintenance performed by Contractors for the month of December, 2000 was ~ 287180.00 compared to ~ 220~943.86 for the month of November ~ 2000. Account No. 5402 $ 14,310.00 Account No. 5401 $ 13,870.00 Account No. 999-5402 $ - 0 - CC: Ron Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works Ali Moghadam, Senior Engineer - (CIP/Traffic) Greg Butler, Senior Engineer - (Capital Improvements) Amer Attar, Senior Engineer - (Capital Improvements) Jerry Alegda, Senior Engineer - (Land Development) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ITEM NO. 5 POLICE CHIEF'S REPORT APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANCE CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OFTEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Jim Domenoe, Chief of Police('~ January 23, 2001 Monthly Departmental Report The following report reflects special teams, traffic enforcement and miscellaneous activity occurring dudng December of 2000. Part One cdme statistics are displayed by reporting district within the City, providing stable parametem for monitoring criminal activity, and aiding in planning police resource deployment. The Police Department responded to forty-five "priority one" calls for service dudng the month of December, with an average response time of approximately 7.4 minutes. A total of 1,262 calls for police service were generated in the City of Temecula during the month. During the month of December, the Temecula Police Department's storefront served a total of 212 customers. Fingerprinting services for this month showed forty-four prints taken, thirty-two people filed police reports, fifteen people had citations signed off and eleven oversized vehicle permits were issued. Crime Prevention Officer Lynn Fanene participated in a number of special events and community oriented programs during the month. Officer Fanene worked at the annual Christmas parade and at the Western Eagle Foundations annual Santa's Corner Christmas party for 1500 children. Officer Fanene conducted nine residential security visits and eleven business security visits during the month. He conducted four visits to businesses for crime follow-up information. Officer Fanene completed his article for the Valley Business Journal titled "lntemal Theft Prevention- part 1 of 2." The POP Team of Officers John Anderson and Earl Quinata continued to work on the "Crime Free Multi Housing" project. The officers are working with two complexes, which are in the final stages of certification. They are also in the process of working to re-certify four complexes who are continuing with the program. The team continued their Warrant Apprehension Program (WAP) during the month, which resulted in two felony arrests and five misdemeanor arrests for suspects with outstanding warrants. Other programs conducted this month included working with the Alcoholic Beverage Control and the Department of Health on alcohol abuse and smoking related incidents in licensed businesses. As a result of this program, a total of five citations were issued for violations. Monthly Departmental Report Page 2 The team continued their Crime Free Parks program and held a meeting with the Public Works and Community Services Departments to discuss graffiti issues. High frequency patrols were conducted throughout the month with no arrests made. The team also worked the continuing homeless assistance program, which resulted in contacting five subjects who were offered and refused assistance. The Old Town Storefrent has now been operational for eight months. This storefront has served as an office for the POP team and has greatly increased their availability to serve the Old Town area. This month the Old Town storefront served eighty-seven customers, six fingerprints were taken, eight reports were written and one citation was signed off. The traffic team reported that during the month of December there were 286 citations issued for hazardous violations, 106 citations were issued for non-hazardous violations and 114 parking citations were issued. There were eight injury traffic collisions, forty-nine non-injury collisions were reported and twenty-eight drivers were arrested for DUI. The monthly ERACIT program was not held this month due to a special enforcement program for DUI drivers held throughout the month. The Neighborhood Enforcement Team (NET) program resulted in fifty-two citations being issued. This program addresses traffic concerns in residential neighborhoods with a dedicated motor officer. The traffic team was responsible for the planning and operation of the annual Christmas parade. This event was an outstanding success with a crowd estimated at 20,000. There were no problems associated with the parade in regards to traffic and public safety. This event required the use of the Posse, Reserves and Explorers to maintain public and traffic safety. During the month of December, the POP officers assigned to the Promenade Mall handled a total of 198 calls for service (up from 130 last month). The predominant numbers of these calls were for shoplifting investigations. These calls resulted in the criminal arrest and filings on thirty-five misdemeanors and seven felony cases for various offenses. Twelve citations were also issued. Dudng the month a significant extra enforcement program was utilized to deal with the large crowds (estimated at over 30,000 per day). This required the use of the Reserves, Posse and Explorers to maintain public and traffic safety. During the holiday season the Department received many positive comments from the public for this extra effort. Officer Robles facilitated a bilingual presentation on "Tough Love" to a group of parents covedng such topics as, youth intervention and juvenile law. The mall officers are also planning their next session of training for the mall merchants titled "Handling Civil and Domestic Disputes" which will be presented during January. The school resource officers continue to remain active in their schools. During the past month, the officers conducted numerous presentations in areas such as narcotic identification, Stranger Danger, traffic safety etc. They also conducted counseling sessions with students. Seven arrests were made at Chaparral High School, and one arrest was made at Temecula Valley High School. The School Resource Officers also assisted with a planned speaking event that was held at Chaparral High School titled "Hate & Extremist Groups." A guest speaker from the' Simon Wiesenthal Center for Tolerance gave a dramatic presentation to a group of Law Enforcement and School District Employees on this topic. The JOLT program (Juvenile Offender Law Enforcement Program) continues to be a success in part through its youth court program. Dudng this month a new Probation Department employee was assigned to the program and received training from the JOLT officer. The JOLT officer assisted at other schools with truancy meetings and follow up with parents of juveniles in the JOLT program. During the month of December, the Special Enforcement Team of Officers Rich Holder and Mark Kdkava handled a total of twenty-one cases. These cases resulted in twenty-five misdemeanor and Monthly Departmental Report Page 3 fourteen felony arrests, primarily for narcotics violations. They also issued fifteen citations for various violations. This team continues to work street level narcotics and specialty patrol within the city on a pro-active basis. During this month the team arrested two suspects for possession of methamphetamine for sale, two for marijuana cultivation and two for possession of marijuana for sale. Volunteers from the community continue to be an integral part of the Temecula Police Department's staff. Under the guidance of volunteer coordinator Gayle Gerrish, the Police Department's volunteer staff contributed 682 hours of service in December (up over 100 hours from last month). Volunteer assignments include computer data input, logistics support, special event assistance and telephone answering duties. The reserve officer program and mounted posse are additional valuable volunteer resources available to the police department. The police department utilizes reserve officers to assist with patrol, traffic enforcement, crime prevention, off road vehicle enforcement and a variety of special functions. Reserve police officers worked a total of 179 hours during the month (109 hours were specifically spent on patrol in Temecula during the Christmas parade and Promenade Mall program). The Reserves were also used for an off-road motorcycle enforcement program held during the month. This program targeted violators in the area of Butteffield Stage Road that has caused several citizens to complain. No violators were observed during this program. The posse contributed 138 hours during the month for both the Christmas parade and the Promenade Mall holiday program. ITEM NO. 6 FIRE CHIEF'S REPORT Temecula Fire Services Monthly Activity Statistics Month DECEMBER Year 2000 Structure Fires 9 2 7 4 22 Vehicle Fires 1 5 1 0 7 Vegetation Fires 4 5 4 1 14 Other Fires 4 10 5 4 23 Medical Aids 64 45 37 109 255 Traffic Collisions 20 36 5 7 68 False Alarms 31 48 11 15 105 Fire Menace Standbys 5 7 0 9 21 Public Service Assists 2 8 4 3 17 Assists and Covers 4 30 5 25 64 Totals: 144 196 79 177 596 Community Activities 4 0 0 0 4 School Programs 4 0 0 2 6 Fairs and Displays 0 0 0 0 0 Company Inspections 15 0 0 0 15 LE-38 Dooryard Inspectic0 0 0 0 0 Fire Investigations 0 0 6 9 15 Burning Permits Issued 0 0 2 5 7 Preplans 0 0 2 1 3 I Totals: 23 0 10 17 50 Form B15-1 (4/99) By: Carl Calderon Date: 1/10/01 Total Runs for the Month: Medical Aids Traffic Collisions Public Service Assists Fire Menace Stanc~y's Stmctare Fires Ringing Alarms Vegetation Fires Vehicle Fives Refuse ftres Hazardous Materials Average Response Time Longest Response Time MEDIC SQUAD 84 MONTHLY RESPONSE SUMMARY DECEMBER 2000 15 Minutes: See comments Medic Squad Cancelled Prior To Patient Contact: 93 Times Medical Aid and Traffic Collisions with Medic Squad on scene prior to AIVlR: 90 Times Performed Advance Life Support prior to AMP, arrival: 41 Times Total Responses for Year 2000: 2914 Comments: Medic Squad 84 responded to a total of 258 calls in the Month of December. 212 of those calls were for Medical Aids and Traffic Collisions of which the Squad was canceled 93 times or 44% of the time. The Medic Squad arrived on scene prior to AMR 85 times or 40% of the time and initiated ALS care on 41 calls or 48%. AMR's average response time to these calls was 4.7 minutes after the arrival of the Medic Squad. On 8 occasions, the Medic Squad was on scene greater than 10 minutes before the arrival of AMR. The longest wait for an AIVlR unit was 16 minutes. Medic Squad 84 had 5 response times of over 10 Minutes for the month, the longest of which was 15 minutes. Three of these responses were to the North East End of the dry, utilizing Squad 10, MS84 was out of service for brake repair. The D-minute response was a dispatch error, Highway 79 north versus Highway 79 south. 258 172 40 4 3 5 26 1 0 4 0 5.0 Minutes Temecula Fire Services Monthly Activity Statistics Month NOVEMBER Year 2000 Structure Fires 7 17 11 1 36 Vehicle Fires 1 3 1 0 5 Vegetation Fires 1 5 2 2 10 Other Fires 2 6 4 5 17 Medical Aids 51 44 34 83 212 Traffic Collisions 20 31 8 12 71 False Alarms 37 22 11 13 83 Fire Menace Standbys 6 5 4 1 16 Public Service Assists 7 13 3 10 33 Assists and Covers 6 30 4 15 55 Totals: 138 176 82 142 538 Community Activities 2 1 0 1 4 School Programs 0 0 0 8 8 Fairs and Displays 0 0 1 0 1 Company Inspections 123 135 0 25 283 LE-38 Dooryard Inspections 0 0 0 0 0 Fire Investigations 0 0 3 0 3 Burning Permits Issued 12 0 3 4 19 Preplans 2 0 2 2 6 I Totals: 139 136 9 40 324 Form B15-1 (4/99) By: Carl Calderon Date: 12/7/00